T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
264.1 | | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Thu Aug 13 1987 13:38 | 8 |
|
Back the high speed needle valve out to three turns and change
the glowplug. I have had/seen fox's that go belly up because of
lean runs and also some leakage around the center post. These
changes should get the engine started and running. From there you
can lean it out to get your high speed needle setting.
Tom
|
264.2 | Try This... | 3417::JORGENSEN | | Thu Aug 13 1987 13:56 | 13 |
| You might also check your low speed valve... I had an O.S. 25
that had acted quite the same as yours, and that was the problem.
It loaded up on the ground and quit in the air after leaning out.
If you still have your manual, it should tell you how many turns
to open it(Make sure the throttle is all the way closed when adj)
Also, do yourselfe a favor and get rid of the Blast!! I
changed to Red Max this spring(from Blast) and my engines run
MUCH better. I use premium 10% nitro.
Good luck... Engine trouble can really be an annoyance!
/Brian
|
264.3 | *&%^$#@(>???! | GHANI::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT RC-AV8R | Thu Aug 13 1987 15:23 | 53 |
| Jim,
I had a lengthy reply all typed out for you but, for the second
time this week, the system refused to add my reply: error message
said something like "SYSTEM PARTNER FAILED TO LINK" ?? What's going
on I wonder?
Anyhow, lemme' add my 2-cents worth. I'll defer to Tom and Brian
as regards direct knowledge of your particular engine and second
the motion that you try a new plug and fresh/different fuel. You
may have to try it with the sleeve in BOTH positions to prove any-
thing since you're now uncertain which was is correct. Let me just
add that fuel DOES go bad with age but it has NOTHING to do with
loss of nitro....any engine )except for a highly altered HOT-DAWG
racing engine) will run just fine without nitro. The main reason
it's added to glo-fuel (in the USA only) is as an "igniter" which
causes the mixture to burn a little hotter, keeping the plug hotter
in turn and, thereby, giving you a more reliable idle. Of course
a few extra "R's" are gained in the process but, in a "normal" en-
gine, nitro is NOT essential to whether or not the engine runs.
Please permit me to make a coupla' suggestions regarding engine
tear-downs: 1.) Unless the engine has ingested an enormous quan-
tity of contamination (dirt), NEVER tear an engine completely down.
You can clean it just fine by removing the head, backplate and carb
ONLY! Just slosh it around in HOT, dish-soapy water while simul-
taneously rotaing the crank. Then put the parts on a paper towel
to drain and air-dry. I don't recommend force-drying with heat
as heat tends to promote RUST. Reassemble using a GOOD quality
oil (like Hoppe's gun oil) and use it libreally, especially on the
bearings. If I don't get a dense blue cloud of smoke the first
time I run the engine, I figger' I was too stingy with the oil.
Incidentally, WD-40 is an excellent rust-chaser but it leaves little
or no residual oil so, if you use WD, be sure to follow-up with
plenty of good oil like Hoppe's.
If forced to totally disassemble an engine to replace a damaged/broken
part, take your time...pay attentin to any/all parts that can
potentially be assembled. Use a scribe to make alignment marks
BEFORE removing head-from-cylinder, sleeve-from-cylinder and rod-
from-crankpin. Also note position of the baffle atop the piston
(if your engine has one). These simple steps will save you a LOTTA'
grief when reassembling and when complete, you'll KNOW it's RIGHT!
Don't forget that things have to re-seat themselves now so treat the
engine like a new one...run it a little rich for a few flights so
the disturbed parts have a chance to wear-in again.
Hope some of this helps, now or in the future. These little mills
are precision instruments and need to be treated and cared for as
such.
Adios, Al
|
264.4 | keep those cards and letters comming | RUTLND::JONEILL | | Fri Aug 14 1987 07:48 | 10 |
| Thanks Al, and the rest of you for the help. The weekends here and
I'll give it another shot. Someone had mentioned a small "o"ring
somewhere in the needle valve, could someone elaborate on this if
in fact it does exist? Another question I have concerns port timming
, does this only apply to shnurled (spelling) ported engines?Another
thing was explained to me about the high speed and idle adjustment
screws, they said one effects the other, could someone further this
statement. Thanks again for any help you people are able to give.
baffled in boston
|
264.5 | connecting rod fit | RIPPER::CHADD | Go Fast; Turn Left | Mon Aug 17 1987 20:47 | 32 |
| Jim,
As you say many comments have been made as to the correct way to reassemble an
engine in previous notes, it would be worth your while reading them. I will
make some comments that may help.
> carb. what I did find was that the con. rod was worn at the top
> where the wrist pin goes through. This item was replaced, the engine
It is a common fallacy that the Con-Rod should be a tight fit. I actually put a
tapered reamer through the rod bush to give more clearance and ensure
lubricants reach the bearing. Remember all the rod does is follow the crank and
move the piston up on compression and force the crank down on the combustion
stroke. A tight fit is not necessary for optimum performance. I don't recommend
this be tried by inexperienced users, strictly for those who know what they are
doing. You should also note there is a correct way found for the con rod. The
side with the beveled big end goes towards the crank shaft.
> lean. I then took the engine home and opened it up again (someone
> had ask if I put the sleeve in backwards and thought I'd better
> check) It look as though the intake port was closing first allowing
> fuel to esape before compression (fuel from the exaust makes you
> think rich, right) when actually it was being starved (my guess)
> which would explaine the over heating. For the heck of it I turned
> the sleeve so the exaust closes first, replaced the glow plug and
> tryed again. It dose seem to run better but only with the glow clip
It is normal for the exhaust to close after the induction ports, this allows
boost to be obtained when a tuned pipe is used. (See the note on engine tuning)
John
|
264.19 | advice for owner of a balky new engine | CTD024::TAVARES | John -- Stay low, keep moving | Thu Oct 12 1989 16:15 | 33 |
| A glow plug can be bad even though it glows. But for the
circumstances you're under -- a brand new engine -- you can
assume the plug is good if it shows red when the battery is
applied.
What you're really up against is inexperience and a brand new
engine. They are awfully touchy at the beginning when the parts
are still tight and the needle valve has not been set; it does
get much better. Each engine has a little personality in that it
likes a certain way you do the starting procedure; you get to
learn this over time.
For instance, my OS .25 likes to be flipped about a half dozen
times with the batery disconnected; the K&B .20 thinks this is
poison; it likes to be turned over a couple of times then flipped
two or three times more with your finger over the carb opening.
I'd venture that even two engines of the same make will like
different treatment. This comes with time as you get to know
your engine.
Also, though, it takes some time with these glow engines to know
them. I would now ordinarily go into a tirade about how ignorant
the local engine experts are of the subject; but given your
circumstances (I detect a man going down for the third time), I'd
say to take the engine out to the nearest club field and ask
questions. Don't take it to a hobby shop. What you need is to
have someone fiddle with your live engine; the guy behind the
counter will only give advice.
This is one of the few instances where I think field advice is
preferable to hobby shop advice. Both are however, preferable to
any of my advice!
|
264.6 | OS .40 FP with Snuffler setup questions | AKOAV8::CAVANAGH | I have more ways of spending money....... | Thu Jul 12 1990 10:27 | 53 |
|
I have a few questions about my engine setup...
I have an OS .40 FP with a Snuffler muffler in my Wot 4 (I had an extension
tube on the exhaust pipe to divert the glow glop but took it off for tuning
purposes)
I am having a hell of a time trying to get this setup to run right. It seems
to always be too rich or too lean. If it flies well at a setting for one
flight, the next flight might lean out.
Here are a couple of observations I made yesterday.
o With the engine at full throttle I adjusted the needle valve to max
rpm's. I held the plane in a nose up attitude to see if it would
lean out and it was fine. Within seconds after takeoff the engine
sagged and I had to land.
o I then richened the needle valve a couple of clicks and had the same
results.
o Then I opened the needle valve 1 1/2 turns to find no change in engine
speed. It did not appear to richen the mixture. I tried it there anyway
and had a great flight.
o The next attempt I couldn't get the plane off the ground because I had
not power (too rich).
o So I leaned it out about 3/4 of a turn and got a decent flight (it was the
last of the day so I don't know if it will continue to run well).
o If I do a loop or a snap roll I loose power for about 3 seconds. It really
sags! This could get me in trouble!
o The clunk is not stuck in the front of the tank. There are no kinks in
the fuel lines. The engine is new (about 3 dozen flights on it) and has
never been in a crash (other than a cartwheel).
So.....does anyone know how to set up an engine with a Snuffler on it? I have
not run the engine with the stock "muffler", ever. So I don't know if it is
strictly a Snuffler setup problem.
Thanks,
Jim
|
264.7 | Gotta run the ABC rich | CLOSUS::TAVARES | Stay Low, Keep Moving | Thu Jul 12 1990 12:18 | 7 |
| Jim, replace the glow plug with a K&B plug and run the engine
at just above the 4-cycle/2-cycle break point. Engines not only
unload in the air, they also lean out, a factor often neglected
in setting them up. Also, the new .40FP is ABC and does not lose
compression/power when it heats up due to being lean. This used
to save us the glow plug, now it wrecks them on the first lean
run. I've been there.
|
264.8 | Check needle valve | HPSPWR::WALTER | | Thu Jul 12 1990 12:23 | 6 |
| For what it's worth, I had similar problems with my .40FP last year (non-ABC,
no Snuffler). The mixture setting kept moving around. It turned out I had gunk
in the needle valve. Flushing the valve and installing a fuel line filter solved
the problem.
Dave
|
264.9 | I did that.... | AKOAV8::CAVANAGH | I have more ways of spending money....... | Thu Jul 12 1990 12:24 | 8 |
|
I did forget to mention that I did replace the glow plug after the 4th flight
with a K&B plug. No difference.
If I have the engine too rich then I don't have enough power for takeoff.
Jim
|
264.10 | Always overlooking the obvious.... | AKOAV8::CAVANAGH | I have more ways of spending money....... | Thu Jul 12 1990 12:26 | 11 |
|
Dave,
I'll check the needle valve tonight. I don't know why I didn't think of
that. A clogged spray hole would certainly make it tough to adjust the mixture.
Thanks,
Jim
|
264.11 | vent tube | RVAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Thu Jul 12 1990 12:37 | 10 |
| Jim,
Also check the vent line to the tank. Blow through it to make
sure it's clear. I was having a similar problem with the Fiesta
awhile back and it turned out the foam I had on top of the tank
was forcing the tank down on top of the brass vent tube inside the
tank. Not getting tank pressure, it would run fine for the normal
checkout on the ground, then lean out in the air.
Steve
|
264.12 | | GIDDAY::CHADD | | Thu Jul 12 1990 20:16 | 20 |
| Dirt in the fuel would be my number one guess; after that I would guess on a
tank positioning problem. I would be interested to know if you are running any
muffler pressure as it pressure could be a fix. What pressure does
is to increase the fuel flow as the RPM increases and effectively improves
needle margin.
> in setting them up. Also, the new .40FP is ABC and does not lose
> compression/power when it heats up due to being lean. This used
> to save us the glow plug, now it wrecks them on the first lean
> run. I've been there.
Some how people have the idea that ABC is bad. I don't want to appear agro but
that is further from the truth than you can imagine. ABC is the best thing to
happen to engines.
For 2 strokes ABC is the answer. I am not flaming but lets finally stop this
crap about "the problem with ABC's". I would never recommend anybody buy a
ringed 2 stroke.
John
|
264.13 | Gotta' get my priorities straight! | AKOAV8::CAVANAGH | I have more ways of spending money....... | Fri Jul 13 1990 09:49 | 8 |
| Well I got side tracked last night and didn't get a chance to look at my
engine. With a little luck I'll get to it tonight (I might be going to
the Heart <Ann and Nancy Wilson> concert at Great Woods! The best part is
the tickets are free!!!!!). I am using a brand new bottle of fuel so I
wouldn't expect dirt there, but I'll check the tank for crap.
Jim
|
264.14 | ABC Soup | CLOSUS::TAVARES | Stay Low, Keep Moving | Fri Jul 13 1990 11:11 | 47 |
| John, I'm sorry that I gave the impression that I'm rapping the
.40 ABC, and ABC's in general. What I've been trying to say is
that we have to treat them differently than we did the old lapped
piston.
Where with the lapped engines we could set them "a couple of
clicks rich" and be done with it, the ABC needs to be set much
richer, at just slightly above the point were it breaks into
2-cycle. The problem is compounded because the field wisdom
hasn't caught up to this one yet and it disguises itself as many,
many things like tank position, pressure, dirt, etc. What's
worse is that changing one of these things improves the situation
slightly for a short time and makes you think you've fixed the
problem.
I think it does this because the plug only typically goes
slightly bad (deep inside the element), and improving the fuel
flow/mixture makes it run better for a short time. But the
bottom line is that the plug is sour and needs to be replaced.
I've followed Clarence Lee's column through my back issues of RCM
over its 20 or so years, and there's one thing he's been
consistent on: one lean run and you've ruined the glow plug if not
damaged/ruined the engine.
I've found that even a short leaning out on an engine with a
severe taper fit on the piston like my infamous K&B (its taking a
rest now btw) will screw the plug -- I mean nothing more than the
act of tweaking it in too far for a few seconds while adjusting
it. This starts the chain of events that has had me buying new
fuel and getting frustrated at field advice for the last 3 years.
John, against your knowledge of engines, I feel like a babbling
kid -- if you tell me I'm full of bull, that's what I am...but
I'll keep on believing this because it's consistent with
everything I've experienced.
Also, when I lay down my model bucks for an engine, you better
believe the ABC's will get my buy. Though my experience to date
has shown that they are fussier, run hotter, and have no real
advantage in power over the lapped piston engine. My lapped
piston Fox .36 puts out lots, lots, more power than the .40FP
(and runs cold as a cucumber), and my old lapped OS .25 is
nothing short of fantastic.
I cannot explain the above and continue to think that any day now
the .40 FP will live up to its ABC promise.
|
264.15 | VERY PUZZLING...... | UPWARD::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) 551-5572 | Fri Jul 13 1990 11:33 | 35 |
| Re: .-1, John T.,
I can't imagine what yer' personal situation might be nut let me assure
you that an ABC engine puts out _gobs_ more power than a like ringed
engine. I know yer' talking the O.S. .40 ABC versus a lapped-piston
Fox .36 but yer' really talking apples and oranges here...kind'a like
if I said my O.S. .61FSR ABC doesn't have near the power of my Chevy
350 c.i.d. What I'm saying is that, compared against a conventional
ringed O.S. .40, the ABC version, IF it's properly broken in and
running correctly, will be _noticeably_ more powerful. The ol' Yeller'
Peril was barely a marginal performer with a ringed .61FSR in it and
switching to the .61ABC was like dropping a .90 in it...the difference
was _that_ dramatic.
Also, I'm not sure where yer' getting this idea that an ABC must be run
richer than a ringed engine. I run the .61 ABC in the ol' Yeller' Peril
at absolute maximum peak at all times...I _have_ to due to the plane's
elevated weight; otherwise performance would be P-poor to below! And,
it runs no hotter (or cooler) than the ringed .61FSR that preceded it
in the same plane. Onliest thang' I kin' think of is that yer' engine
is not broken in yet...ABC's _do_ take longer to run in.
I tend to agree that ABC's _are_ just a tad fussier to break in than
their ringed counterparts (but not that different from lapped piston
engines). This is why I'll seldom recommend an ABC to a raw beginner;
he's got enough other pressures on him in the early going and needs an
engine that breaks in quickly and runs reliably. Later on, YOU BET, I
recommend nothing else than ABC and will buy nothing else myself from
now on (where a choice exists).
__
| | / |\
\|/ |______|__(o/--/ | \
| | 00 <| ~~~ ____ 04 ---- | --------------------
|_|_| (O>o |\)____/___|\_____|_/ Adios amigos, Al
| \__(O_\_ | |___/ o (The Desert Rat)
|
264.16 | | GIDDAY::CHADD | | Sun Jul 15 1990 22:17 | 20 |
| <<< Note 264.14 by CLOSUS::TAVARES "Stay Low, Keep Moving" >>>
Sorry John if I offended you, it was most certainly not intended. As Al pointed
out in -.1 ABC is more power/lb than ringed engines. I have perceived a general
trend of 'anti ABC' through the conference. Your note just happened to be the
one I bit at.
I would hate to see a newcomer put of an ABC purchase and felt some response
was necessary.
> I think it does this because the plug only typically goes
> slightly bad (deep inside the element), and improving the fuel
> flow/mixture makes it run better for a short time. But the
> bottom line is that the plug is sour and needs to be replaced.
Very good point but I suggest the plug going slightly bad is probably due to
the deterioration of the element surface; ie: the whitish color of the element
compared to the silver shiny element when new.
John
|
264.17 | NO HOTTER, NO HUNGRIER.... | UPWARD::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) 551-5572 | Mon Jul 16 1990 12:05 | 20 |
| Re: .15,
I meant to add that I find the ABC much more (not less) tolerant of a
lean/hot run...that's what it's designed for, after all. The aluminum/
brass/chrome components expand under heat at differing rates such that
the piston will not sieze to the cylinder liner but will maintain
optimum compression through a VERY wide temp range, far superior to
lapped or ringed engines in this characteristic.
Also, I find plug useage to be in absolute parity with my ringed
.60/.61's...no better, no worse. As I said, the only thing I can think
of with yer' personal situation is that the engine simply isn't broken
in yet as these symptoms (hot runs/plug useage) can exist with _any_
new engine.
__
| | / |\
\|/ |______|__(o/--/ | \
| | 00 <| ~~~ ____ 04 ---- | --------------------
|_|_| (O>o |\)____/___|\_____|_/ Adios amigos, Al
| \__(O_\_ | |___/ o (The Desert Rat)
|
264.18 | Maybe I'm just leaning it out too much | AKOAV8::CAVANAGH | I have more ways of spending money....... | Mon Jul 16 1990 15:58 | 15 |
|
Well I pulled the carb apart Saturday night and checked the tank..etc..etc..
I found nothing. When I got to the field on Sunday I adjusted the setting
and went up for the first flight. The engine leaned out after about 8 minutes
and I had to make a quick landing. The rest of the day (fun fly) only had
flights of 3 mins or less, so I don't know if I got it richened enough now
or not.
Oh yeah...I had been having a minor problem with the seal between the
Snuffler and the main part of the original muffler, so I sealed it up
with RTV. That may change my tank pressure so I'm going to start from
ground zero with the adjustments next time I get out.
Jim
|
264.20 | Balky Engine ??? | SELL3::MARRONE | | Wed Sep 05 1990 14:20 | 28 |
| I'm running into a problem with on OS .46 SF that I could use some help
with. When the engine was brand new, I did the usual 2-3 tank burn at
a rich setting. The first 10-15 flights were perfect from an engine
standpoint, ie, no problems. Then, one day, it started to stall out
during touch-and-gos as I was giving it full throttle on the up swing.
No amount of playing with the needle valve or carb helped. It kept
stalling out during power up. Then, on some successive flights, it
just up and quit during normal flight. On the ground, we had a devil
of a time trying to get it to run at all. Finally, we bypassed the
in-line fuel filter and Dubro Quik-fill valve, and things seemed to
improve.
I then cleaned out the fuel tank, changed some tubing that had tiny
holes in it, cleaned out the fill valve and filter, and tried another
flight. Same problem. Nothing I've done seems to work. My instructor
says its a fuel flow problem and that the engine is not getting the
right amount of fuel, hence starves and dies. He thinks the Quik-fill
is the culprit. If its the fill valve, then it had to somehow go bad,
because this engine had many flights on it before the current problem
showed up.
So, what am I dealing with? Is it a fuel flow problem or a balky
engine? BTW, this is a ringed engine, if that makes any difference.
Some input from the engine mavens out there would be appreciated.
Thanks,
|
264.21 | Another OS SF 46 owner's experiences... | HPSRAD::AJAI | | Wed Sep 05 1990 15:20 | 37 |
| I'm no engine guru, but you could read about my woes with my OS SF 46
ABC in 239.2122, and see if you find any fresh ideas there, though your
problem is a different from what I have described therein.
Nonetheless, I must admit to having my engine quit on throttling up on
occassion - especially after a long duration of idle (while coming in for a
landing). I have adjusted my lowspeed needle for rapid/instantaneous
response when I open up from idle. Most of the days, my engine
throttles up fine, but on a _few_ occassions, it has quit at
embarrassingly low altitudes, resulting twice in landings into pricker
bushes.
One instance that I distinctly remember is when I was in my marathon
century touch-and-go session. The engine, which had been throttling up
fine for over 90 T&Gs, began to hesitate the last few times, with the
hesitation duration increasing with each T&G. Perhaps it was due to the
sun going down and the consequent drop in ambient temperature - I had
not re-adjusted the mixture. Engine was fine the next day.
Btw, I too use a Du-Bro Kwik-filler, and a Sullivan crap-trap in line
filter without having experienced any problems. Steve Smith owned a
ringed version of the SF46 just like you do, and you might try tapping
him for his experiences at RVAX::SMITH.
I still do get into trouble occassionally when I try hovering my plane
for 3~4 minutes, with the engine idling all the while, but then, I am
really asking for trouble with the engine loading up. Overall, my
engine can change from a kittens purr to a lions ROAR 'most always.
I would be interested to hear how you solve your problem ultimately,
since I haven't been able to find an explanation for mine misbehaving
on the few occassions that it did.
Good Luck
ajai
|
264.22 | YOU MAY'VE ALREADY ISOLATED THE PROBLEM.... | UPWARD::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) 551-5572 | Wed Sep 05 1990 15:22 | 23 |
| Re: .-1, Joe,
If bypassing the fill valve/fuel filter, i.e. running a line directly
from the tank's clunk line to the carb, corrects or even improves the
problem, you've definitely isolated the problem to either the fill
valve, the fuel filter, the connecting fuel line or any combination of
the three.
The fact that the engine _used_ to run fine with these components is
immaterial; things go bad and cause problems. Again, the acid test is
how the engine performs with these items shunted out of the circuit.
Other things that can cause trouble are: pin-hole leaks anywhere in
_any_ of the fuel tubing, even inside the tank; pinched/doubled up
clunk line; pinched/blocked overflow/vent line. Fuel system problems
are most often the culprit in these type situations but poorly adjusted
carbs can also be at fault.
__
| | / |\
\|/ |______|__(o/--/ | \
| | 00 <| ~~~ ____ 04 ---- | --------------------
|_|_| (O>o |\)____/___|\_____|_/ Adios amigos, Al
| \__(O_\_ | |___/ o (The Desert Rat)
|
264.23 | Fuel Leakage Around Prop Shaft | CIVIC::MARRONE | | Thu Jun 27 1991 14:05 | 19 |
| I acquired a used-but-in-good-running-condition K&B .40 with a Perry
carb, and have been using it in my Eagle 2 lately. Although the engine
has been running pretty well, I have noticed raw fuel leaking out of
the shaft (just behind the prop) at all speeds, but obviously much
worse at full power. As I hold the plane from the rear while adjusting
the needle valve, I get sprayed by fuel. I also have been experiencing
difficulty getting the idle adjusted right lately.
Question: what is the reason for the fuel leakage at the shaft? Can it
be fixed, and is this a do-it-yourself fix or a factory rebuild?
I tried to tear down the engine but could not separate the shaft from
the housing even after removing the locking pin. So I stopped there
and decided to post this question.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Joe
|
264.24 | | SA1794::TENEROWICZT | | Thu Jun 27 1991 14:54 | 7 |
| Joe,
Many engines use this to lubricate the front bearing. WHen it's
excessive it may signal that the front bearing is wearing and may need
to be changed. Maybe someone else can shed some additional light?
Tom
|
264.25 | Not a problem | SPREC::CHADD | Five days and counting | Thu Jun 27 1991 20:34 | 17 |
| Don't worry about it. The crank case will be positive pressure and will tend to
force fuel through the front bearings.
If your engine has just started loosing fuel through the front bearing it will
be a worn seal on the bearing; that is the metal or rubber seal over the
bearing.
If the engine has always done it you will find it probably does not have a
seal. I remove the seals to ensure the bearings are cooled and well lubricated,
many high performance engines never have a seal. The overall effect on
crankcase pressure in not important.
A well lubricated cool bearing is more important than the lose of a small
amount of fuel.
John
|
264.26 | Engine Blew a Glow Plug | SELL1::MARRONE | | Thu Jul 25 1991 14:11 | 22 |
| Last night while flying my Skytiger powered by an OS 46 SF, I
experienced a VERY wierd problem. I had already put in several 5-7
minute flights and had refuled for the next take-off. While taxiing
out of the pit area, I heard a loud POP, almost as loud as a
firecracker, and the engine goes dead. I looked at the engine, and in
disbelief saw that the glow plug was missing. It apparently just BLEW
OUT!!? Never found it. The threads on the cylinder head were in
pristine condition, so apparently, the glow plug kind of just
disintegrated and blew away. Has anyone ever heard of this before?
I'm baffled as to what may have happened. I know the plug was tight,
because I had checked it just prior to starting the engine. I wonder
if the heat might have something to do with it.
Last night's temp at the Merrimack field I estimate to be in the 80-85
degree range. Not terribly hot when I consider that last Sat I flew in
temperatures close to 100 degrees. The engine has been rather balky in
this temp range with more frequent dead stick landings, but other than
that I can't figure what went wrong.
Puzzled,
Joe
|
264.27 | Popped glow plug | SNAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Thu Jul 25 1991 14:26 | 11 |
| >> Has anyone ever heard of this before.......
YUP.....Seen it once.
Can't explain it.
Good thing you wern't leaning over the engine adjusting the needle
when it blew.
"OS 46SF SHOOTS MAN DEAD......STORY AT 11."
|
264.28 | Is engine cylinder head clean? | HPSRAD::AJAI | | Thu Jul 25 1991 16:45 | 7 |
| Re dead stick landings...
MY 46 ABC is verrry fussy about being kept clean. If I let crud collect
on the cooling fins, the engine overheats, and starts losing power, and
eventually dies. May not matter with non-ABC though
ajai
|
264.29 | First the Glow Plug - Now the Muffler | SELL1::MARRONE | | Wed Aug 07 1991 13:52 | 35 |
| Well, another strange thing happened to my OS 46 SF yesterday. I
reported that it recently blew out a glow plug. Well yesterday, after
a 10 minute flight, I brought it back to the pits for re-fueling. As
the plane sat there in front of me, I heard a metallic clanking sound
and the rear end of the muffler just falls off and lands on the
ground!!? Upon close examination, what happened was that the head of
the loonng screw that goes down the center of the muffler had parted
company with the screw, and I guess there was enough tension in the
shaft that as the head popped off, the stored energy in the shaft
pushed the back end off where it harmlessly fell on the ground.
I'm really glad this didn't happen while it was airborne for two
reasons. First, I would have to spend more money to buy the missing
part whereas now I only have to buy the screw. Second, I was curious
if the engine would run without the whole muffler, so I attempted to
start it. Would not run at anything above fast idle. I guess the
needle valve and mixture settings are different with and without
muffler. Soooo...if it had fallen off at full throttle while I was
doing some "death defying maneuvers" (that's an exaggeration, but who
cares, I was in dangerous configurations more than once) I might have
lost power and gone in. Speculation, yes, but with my luck, its very
possible.
Now I'm getting paranoid about this most wonderfully touted engine.
Could there be something intrinsically wrong here? Is it running too
hot? Is it in need of some kind of TLC I simply am not aware of? I
think I treat my equipment with the kind respect and care it deserves,
but perhaps I am ignorant of something and not doing it all. ANy of
you engine mavins got any helpful tips?
BTW, I think it looks pretty clean, Ajai, but as you mentioned in -.1
this might not be as much of an issue since mine is the ringed version.
Thanks,
Joe...still puzzled and wondering what will go wrong next.
|
264.30 | 'tis cleaning time for me...! | HPSRAD::AJAI | | Wed Aug 07 1991 14:17 | 8 |
| Well, it is time for me to clean my engine again this year!! It fooled
me once, but it can't fool me all the time :-)
Gee, but if someone could get my OS SF 61 ABC pumper to run just fine,
I could have some more fun with my WOT4 instead of doing all dead stick
landings!
ajai
|
264.31 | Common problem with those mufflers | SNAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Wed Aug 07 1991 14:28 | 22 |
| RE seperated muffler
Not all that uncommon. That long screw has always been a problem. They
usually wind up stripped due to people constantly re-tightening them
and getting so fed up that they finally over tighten it and strip it.
I just bought a replacement muffler for an OS45 FSR and it's still two
piece, but instead of the screw, the back piece is threaded and screws
directly into the front piece. I guess maybe OS had enough complaints.
I've also seen the muffler's come appart in flight. Either the screw
will come loose and the muffler will fall apart like yours did, or
basically the same thing will happen with a Snuffler. One thing I can
tell you is there is NO mistaking when part of your muffler comes off.
The increase in DB is incredible. If it were to happen, you have to
throttle back immediately and land. More often then not, the engine
keeps running but with the loss of back pressure, probably not well.
It could just as easily die. The only thing you can do is throttle back
and make the best landing you can.
Steve
|
264.32 | K&B .40 help needed | N25480::FRIEDRICHS | Keep'm straight n level | Wed Aug 07 1991 15:36 | 23 |
| OK, different engine problem...
I have a K&B .40 on one of my Eindeckers.. 10x6 master airscrew at
the moment.. I do have a heavy hub (but not the extra heavy).
I originally had the standard carb on it, but since I had a perry
carb laying around, I put that on.. There was no improvement to my
problem...
The problem is that it is taking the engine a (comparatively) long time
to wind down from high to low speed. You see the barrel close from
full open but the rpm's don't drop right off. If the barrel is
completely closed, it could take more than 5-10 seconds before the
engine will get to low idle and a few more seconds before it stops.
I find it hard to believe that he prop/heavy nut are providing that
much "flywheeling", but that is what is really seems like.
Any ideas of what else I could look for??
thanks!
jeff
|
264.33 | Ground tests to try | ZENDIA::REITH | Jim Reith DTN 226-6102 - LTN2-1/F02 | Wed Aug 07 1991 16:09 | 8 |
| The initial thing to do would be to take the Higley nut off and ground
test it to see if it is as simple as "flywheeling". It could be that
you've got an air leak somewhere on the case/carb (not on a K&B 8^) and
the air is allowing it to continue at speed untuil the necessarily rich
mixture gets out of the crankcase. I speak from experience on this one
(not a K&B) in that I had a backplate screw missing and the engine
would only run very rich and would lean out in the air. I didn't notice
much flywheeling but it did take somewhat longer to wind down.
|
264.34 | Some hints | SNAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Wed Aug 07 1991 17:40 | 24 |
| I had somewhat of the same problem with an Enya 60 and Perry carb.
I'd close the throttle all the way and still had to put my finger
over the carb to stop the engine. I found three things, all with
the carb, and all air leaks. The first was with the O ring seal on
the barb neck. I replaced it with a thicker one causing you to have
to compress the carb into the crank case more before tightening giving
a better seal. Second was the two screws on either side of the carb
that hold it into the crank case. Even though they would tighten up,
air still leaked around them. Put them in with either lock tight to
seal up the threads or silicone. The third was the hardest and is
something I can only attribute to a warped or "un-round" carb barrel.
In making the adjust with the little screw that governs how far closed
the barrel will go, you put a piece of tubing on the fuel nipple and
blow through it while closing the carb. When the carb is really closed
you should barely be able to blow air through the tube. I found that
when the barrel was closed "to the eye", I could still blow a fair
amount of air through the tube. closer examination of the carb barrel
revealed a depression/dent that was leaking air. I adjusted the screw
so that the carb barrel went "way" closed which allowed it to get by
the dent and "seal" properly.
In other words, check the carb out REAL WELL.
Steve
|
264.35 | One more thing | SNAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Wed Aug 07 1991 17:43 | 3 |
| I also believe that even though the engine might be running ok,
an improperly adjusted low end mixture will cause the same symptoms
you describe.
|
264.36 | OS50 and OS25 problems... | N25480::FRIEDRICHS | Keep'm straight 'n level | Thu Jun 11 1992 12:56 | 27 |
| Actually, I have two problems I am trying to fix....
1 - OS .50 FSR (fuel system has a dubro quick fill - YUK!)
Engine has good idle and good high end performance. However,
adjustments to the needle valve do not seem to affect the engine!
I can turn it out 2-3 turns without is getting richer.
I think it is an air leak problem, but I can't find anything. Maybe it
is the bloody filler valve. Any other suggestions??
2 - OS .25 in my gremlin...
Overheating like crazy. This engine has taken signifiant abuse, eating
dirt and Jim's gremlin :-) The bearings "feel" OK, although there is
quite a bit of forward/backwards play.
What else should I look for when I break down the engine??
(Guess I will have to use that shinny new .25 for the demo!!)
Suggestions are welcome.
Thanks!
jeff
|
264.37 | Seal It | DENVER::BEATTY | | Mon Jun 22 1992 18:00 | 17 |
| I had an OS50 that was a little sensitive when I first bought it so I
sealed it up by putting hi temp silicone in a bead around the carb base
and by using teflon tape around the needle valve threads. I also
pulled the crank case back cover, gently removed the gasket and put a
very light coat of silicon on the gasket, then with the silicon still
wet I put it back together. Gives you a nice rubberized seal that will
survive inspections and cleaning.
Be careful with the silicone because it can etch the crank if you let
it get below the carb.
For what its worth I always used an air filter and the motor never gave
me trouble in two great seasons of flying.
Good Luck.
Will
|
264.38 | Larger Fuel Tubing solves 1 problem | N25480::FRIEDRICHS | Keep'm straight 'n level | Tue Jul 07 1992 14:25 | 18 |
| Well, I believe I got the OS .50 running better. The problem is, I
made 2 changes at once, so it is not clear which one solved the problem
(although I believe I know...)
1 - I removed the quick fill valve.
2 - I went from medium to large diameter fuel tubing.
I believe that the fuel tubing was restricting the fuel flow. As a
result, no matter how many turns rich I turned the needle, it didn't
change the actual mixture.
It is running like a charm now!
(I haven't had a chance to tear down the OS .25 yet...)
cheers,
jeff
|
264.39 | Quilk Fill = Trouble | CIVIC::MARRONE | | Wed Jul 08 1992 13:07 | 11 |
| Jeff, I had _bad_ results both times I used one of those Dubro Quick
Fill valves. They are a nice concept, but the performance is very
poor. I think they restrict the flow of fuel more than they should,
and as a result, cause the engine to starve for fuel.
I have two used QUick Fill valves for sale...real cheap. Any Takers??
Glad to hear your '50 is back in the running.
Regards,
Joe
|
264.40 | bolt size for Royal | DNEAST::MALCOLM_BRUC | | Thu Jul 08 1993 17:11 | 6 |
| Does anyone know of the top of their head what bolt size is used to
fasten the muffler to the engine on a Royal .45 snhurle (sp
?)
Thanks
Bruce
|