T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1179.1 | "Renault Boutique or the local Scrappie" | AYOV16::AGIBSON | | Mon Aug 13 1990 15:40 | 28 |
| Hi,
It is possible to get a booklet from your Renault Dealer with all
the possible after sale options, but some or rather most of the extra
equipment on the TXE variant must be fitted at the factory. It may be
possible to get central door locking fitted to the TR (this is three
door?) the booklet quotes around 40 pounds for this, also the trim in
the bumpers could be repalced with the trim with the chrome insert ala
the GTS and higher models. The goodies such as electric windows require
new door trims and its priced around 300 pounds if its ordered with the
car from new.
A possible source is perhaps Sports Car Breakers at the roundabout
beside the Uniroyal plant, they used to have a lot of Accident damaged
cars and write offs they stripped and sold parts from.
The last time I was in this yard was approx 2 years ago and then
the were selling things like R5GTT alloys etc.
hope this was helpful.
Alan.
p.s My R19 is three door GTS, which could be doing with some nicer
trim too!!
|
1179.2 | thanks for info...:-) | KIRKTN::KANDERSON | WHERE WEE KERRY? | Thu Aug 16 1990 19:10 | 4 |
| Alan,
Thanks you have been most helpfull,will look into what i can do to
my plain jane TR.
Katrina
|
1179.3 | "More R19 Decor and protection" | AYOV16::AGIBSON | | Fri Aug 17 1990 11:32 | 27 |
| Hi Kat,
Some more info, the "Le Sport" limited Edition has a boot lid or
tail gate spoiler, It may be possible to get this from the dealer to
add to your car. I've been in Southern Ireland Quite alot recently and
over there you can gat the basic van( three door saloon with filled
rear side window) with the tail gate spoiler. So it must be available
as a seperate part.
Perhaps you could treat your car to a nice set of alloys, even
the optional 14" ones from Renault for at wait for it 130 pounds,
these are the same as the 21 TXI alloys I think.
Do you have the extended warranty or is the car just new, either
way check that modifications can be made without rendering it useless.
Another helpful hint. It is possible to get clear protective
plastic from accessory shops. It is advisable to put this on the
leading edge of the bonnet as soon as possible to avoid those horrid
stone chips that it is prone to. I think it is called something along
the lines of "Defender" and cost approx 6 pounds. I will post more
details next week .
Alan.
|
1179.4 | "Flooding R19's." | AYOV11::AGIBSON | | Fri Oct 26 1990 10:26 | 55 |
|
Hi All,
Not sure if anyone reads this note but since its the right note
it will have to do. Over the last month my R19 has been bothered with
a persistant flooding problem. The first time it happened was the night
before its last service( 18000 but odometer was reading 19500), the car
had sat all day in the car park from approx 8:00 am to 4:30pm. When I
left for home the car started fine with choke and managed to get to the
top of the car park and then die. To cut a long story short the RAC
were call and they arrived and managed to get it started, only after
pumping a couple of gallons of petrol out onto the car park surface.
Since it was going in for a service I wasn't to worried
assumming that it would be fixed after the garage being instructed that
it had occurred. The sevice was carried out and paid for and the
flooding problem was corrected(so I was told). Since this service it
has happened another three times each time from a cold start where the
car has been sitting over night or most of the day.
The car was given to the garage yesterday to attempt to discover
the cause of the problem and on phoning to find out if they had come up
with anything I was told they had a look at it taken the jets out an
cleaned them and reset the CO level that was seriously out of
adjustment. Can this happen in the short space of one month, I
personally think it was not adjusted at the last service and only now
has it been corrected.
Well after getting the car the garage announce that they
would like me to test the car to see if it was any better before they
would charge me for this work!!!!!
The car was driven 7 mile home by my girlfriend since I had to
borrow my fathers car to get to work and she said she felt no
difference in the running of the car. I was welding a Beetle for Rik
the Mod of the air cooled conference last night and after it got to
late and dark I decided to test the Renault and take a run to see the
girlfriend, the car would not start without choke after having sat from
just after 5 to 9 at night and on the short distance between houses
approx 2 miles the the car flooded again just a couple of hundred yards
from home!!! Its a good job I've started carrying some tools in the car
something I resent having to do with such a young car.
The car is only 14 months old and for the first 13 months it was
absolutely fine no starting or flooding problems. Either my style of
driving has changed drastically over the last month, I have suddenly
lost all ability to start a car without flooding it or something has
changed or failed in the carb.
Does any one have any suggestions, I myself feel that the carb
is overfilling due to a problem of some kind with the float, these
would be mch appreciated by myself and I could possibly pass it on to
the foreman of the workshop how would appear unable to address the
problem affectively.
Alan.
|
1179.5 | My starter | UKCSSE::RDAVIES | Live long and prosper | Fri Oct 26 1990 10:47 | 9 |
| No experience with R19's, but I did have re-curring flooding with an
old Saab. This was a sticking carb float, it was not rising properly,
and thus not shutting the needle valve. could be
the float
the needle valve it controls
if your system recirculates when this shuts, the return pipe may be
blocked
Richard
|
1179.6 | Renault 19 16 Valve test. | OVAL::SAXBYM | Teenage Mutant Ninja Teutons | Mon Dec 17 1990 09:38 | 33 |
|
Car magazine has the first (to my knowledge) test of the Renault 19 16
valve.
They have tested it against the Rover 216 GTi Twin Cam and the VW Golf
GTi 16 valve in a 'Giant Test'. The car they had was a French
registered left hooker, as the 19 16valve isn't expected here until
January.
The car looks more purposeful than the ordinary 19 (in much the same
way as the 5GTT looks moreso than the ordinary 5) with subtlish body
panels in colour coded form. The engine bay looks good (perhaps not
as good a Vauxhall 16 valve engine, but only perhaps), and the car
tested had terribly gaudy (hoepfully to be toned down for the UK)
versions of the fantastic Renault 5GTT seats so admired by everyone!
Performance is good (0-60 in 7.7 seconds and 135ish mph top, with
healthy mid-range acceleration too) and handling is praised although
the tail apparently can step out in the wet (it is described as being
progressive and easy to control).
You either love or loathe the 19's shape (which to my mind is a prettier
version of the dumpy Astra - not great, but ok), but if the car IS
available at the suggested price of around 12k it will be a real
bargain with electric sunroof, windows and central locking as well as
a trip computer.
I'll be test driving one when the local dealers get a demonstrator, but
if it's as good as they say, I'll find it hard to justify another 5k
for a Calibra 16v with inferior handling and performance even if it is a
better built car.
Mark
|
1179.7 | spotted on M3 | FTCVAX::SMITHS | | Mon Dec 17 1990 09:56 | 12 |
| Re.6
I saw one of these on the M3 last week with trade plates.I was very
impressed with the look of the car.This one was a nice dark metallic
blue,and it had some impressive wheels.
The only reason I noticed it was I spotted the 16 valve badge on the
back,apart from that the styling is quite restrained,if the car
performs as you say I believe they will be worth taking a closer look
at.
steve
|
1179.8 | Hatchback only? | DOOZER::JENKINS | Quote......unquotE | Mon Dec 17 1990 12:43 | 6 |
|
Will the 19 16v be only offered as a hatchback or will the Chamade
get the 16v option as well?
R.
|
1179.9 | Conflicting reports. | OVAL::SAXBYM | Teenage Mutant Ninja Teutons | Mon Dec 17 1990 12:56 | 10 |
|
Well, I believe it's sold in France in the Chamade form, and I have
read that it WILL be available in that form in the UK too, but at when
I asked the local dealer about the booted 16 valve I was told the UK
would NOT be getting get.
It would make an interesting(not to mention quick) alternative to a
Cavalier Sri or an Orion Ghia injection.
Mark
|
1179.10 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | I shot the sherrif (and the deputy!) | Mon Dec 17 1990 13:20 | 1 |
| Surely the Renault 19 GTX is more of an alternative to the Orion Ghia!
|
1179.11 | F(r)ord prices. | OVAL::SAXBYM | Teenage Mutant Ninja Teutons | Mon Dec 17 1990 13:23 | 7 |
|
Re .10
In terms of ability/trim maybe, but have you seen what an Orion Ghia
costs!!!!!
Mark
|
1179.12 | 4wd | CYCLIC::TURNER | | Mon Dec 17 1990 13:34 | 4 |
| Last months CAR magazine mentions a 4WD 16v Turbo Chamade and a few other
goodies from renault, due around 1993 I think.
Barrie
|
1179.13 | | BAHTAT::FORCE4::hilton | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Tue Dec 18 1990 12:01 | 8 |
| re .6
Mark,
Does this 16v have 'spoke' wheels!
Greg
|
1179.14 | Good question! | OVAL::SAXBYM | Teenage Mutant Ninja Teutons | Tue Dec 18 1990 12:04 | 9 |
|
err.
I think so (assuming you mean 5 spoke alloys and not wire wheels!)
I'll bring the magazine in tomorrow and enter some highlights if
any of you are interested.
Mark
|
1179.15 | Ehm, wire I meant, not like R5 | BAHTAT::BAHTAT::HILTON | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Thu Dec 20 1990 11:23 | 7 |
| Nope I meant wire wheels (but didn't know they were called that)!!
Reason I ask is I've seen a done up 19 near me, with wire wheels and
thought it looked pretty good!
Greg
|
1179.16 | | CRATE::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Thu Dec 20 1990 11:26 | 8 |
| � Reason I ask is I've seen a done up 19 near me, with wire wheels and
Sounds odd to me. Aren't wire wheels normally held on as 'centre locks' ?
Perhaps it has a set of wheels which include the 'spokes' as an
embellishment, not dissimilar to a wheel-trim...
J.R.
|
1179.17 | Wire wheels: an "expert" writes | IOSG::MARSHALL | Waterloo Sunset | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:04 | 19 |
| There are three sorts of wire wheels:
1) Centre lock: these have a two inch (approx) splined hole in the middle, to
fit a splined hub on the axle. "Adaptor splines" are available to
fit most ordinary hubs, allowing centre lock wheels to be fitted.
2) Bolt on: these fit on the ordinary four or five bolt hub, although they don't
look as good and you can't fit eared spinners, only the hexagon caps.
3) Wire baskets: these aren't a wire wheel at all. You fit an ordinary wheel,
the Weller steel 8-spoke being popular as it's strong and cheap. The wire
basket, available in chromed steel or plastic, then fits on top like an
ordinary wheel cover. Looks very tacky, although advocated by some as "you
can take them off and clean them in the dishwasher". (NB don't try this with
real wire wheels: for these you need a long brush and a lot of patience!).
It should be easy to see which sort this Renault has...
Scott
|
1179.18 | Choosing "wire" wheels or any other type. | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Adios, amoeba _m_���_m_ | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:18 | 7 |
| Surely the best thing to do is find out what make they are, or look
through the mags for a type that you like, check they are compatible
with the car and include them when you submit a quote. (I assume we're
talking lease-mobiles)
- Roy
|
1179.19 | Monopoly | IOSG::MARSHALL | Waterloo Sunset | Thu Dec 20 1990 15:10 | 9 |
| There is only one make of wire wheel: Dunlop, sold through their subsidiary MWS.
Nowhere in their literature does it mention whether or not they will fit
Renaults. I doubt whether they are available directly from Renault as
"original equipment", so you probably couldn't get a lease-quote for them.
Scott
PS OK, So Borrani (Italy) also make wire wheels but at immense cost and poor
availability in UK...
|
1179.20 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Adios, amoeba _m_���_m_ | Thu Dec 20 1990 16:27 | 13 |
| Re: . 19 <"original equipment">
Since when do accessories specified on lease-quotes have to be
"original equipment" ?
Many sunroofs and alarms are not factory fitted, and not supplied by
the manufacturer.
Why should this be different for wheels ? I thought the idea of the
lease scheme was to allow you to order what you want with as many options
as you like. You just have to pay the extra !
- Roy
|
1179.21 | | CRATE::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Thu Dec 20 1990 17:21 | 10 |
| � Many sunroofs and alarms are not factory fitted, and not supplied by
Aren't most of these items 'dealer fitted', or 'dealer-approved' ?
In all cases, I am sure the lease company would not allow an
'aftermarket' accessory to be fitted that might have any bearing
on any future warranty claim.
Just think, run different wheels and any accident would be the fault
of the wheel manufacturers (or any braking system defect)
|
1179.22 | Where'd the performance go? | OVAL::SAXBYM | Let's get personal | Thu Jan 31 1991 13:31 | 8 |
|
Autocar And Motor has a test of the Renault 19 16 valve today and it
makes interesting reading. For the money they say the car is very good,
but the performance is mediocre. This is strange since CAR magazine
tested a LHD 19 16v last month and found the performance very good.
Is A&M's a freak car or is the RHD version lacking in power?
Mark
|
1179.23 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Help ! I've got Iraqnophobia | Thu Jan 31 1991 13:52 | 6 |
| A&M are very conservative with their compliments. IMHO.
They gave the RS Fiesta bad press with their test drive of that
last august. I test drove this car and found their criticism very
unfounded.
- Roy
|
1179.24 | True. | OVAL::SAXBYM | Let's get personal | Thu Jan 31 1991 13:58 | 13 |
|
Re .23
I agree. Their criticisms of the Renault 5 GT Turbo struck me as
nit-picking and their comments on the Calibra's handling seem harsh too
under road conditions.
Still, I think it's better to err on the cautious side than be
acclaiming everything as the best since sliced bread (for an example of
this read the Kit Car press, with the possible exception of Kit Cars
International).
Mark
|
1179.25 | Not quick | DOOZER::JENKINS | Aventini. Better than an Aventinus | Thu Jan 31 1991 17:46 | 10 |
|
Answering an earlier question in this topic...
The 19 16v will be available in both hatchback and Chamade form.
I also read the road test and was surpised by the performance
figures. Does it have a cat in the UK or something? 140bhp should
make it a lot quicker than 9.5 secs 0-60.
Richard.
|
1179.26 | R19 16v roadtest comments | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Help ! I've got Iraqnophobia | Fri Feb 01 1991 11:51 | 40 |
| The A&M road test was interesting reading.
It gave the impression that they generally liked the car, but the
performance, for them, was disappointing.
Points that I thought were interesting include -
. The base model which includes the usual electric goodies, a trip
computer and alloy wheels, is very competitively priced at �11,995
(still to be confirmed - launch date 15th Feb). Options include 6
speaker stereo (standard is just 2), ABS and leather seats.
All these options would add about �1800 to the base price.
. The performance is poor considering we're talking 137bhp. You need to
get past 4000rpm to get "real" acceleration. 30-50 in 4th takes 9.7
secs, which they mention is 0.1sec slower than the 1.4 R19TSE. That
IS worrying!
. Fuel economy is good Govt figures - 28(urban),47(56mph),38(75mph)
Their "touring" figure was 33.7mpg but I would think between 35-40mpg
should be obtainable on a steady long run. I also like the fact that
it has a 12 gallon petrol tank allowing up to 400 miles between fill
ups.
. They are unhappy about the dash layout calling it "ergonomic
ineptitude". However from the pictures it looks reasonable to me.
The driving position looks good with seat height adjustment and
adjustable rake of the steering wheel.
I have never been a great fan of the shape of the R19, but the body kit
looks good with rear spoiler and air intake in the bonnet.
A test drive in one of these is definately on the cards as is one in
the Clio 16v due out in May.
I may be sticking my neck out, but I would think the price on the lease
scheme would be around the �500+ mark for supplement holders, but we all
know that these prices can be a law unto themselves. I would expect quite
a few quotes going in vtx towards the end of Feb. So keep your peeled :-)
- Roy
|
1179.27 | | HEWIE::RUSSELL | Well, it was here a minute ago... | Fri Feb 01 1991 13:29 | 17 |
| > The performance is poor considering we're talking 137bhp. You need to
> get past 4000rpm to get "real" acceleration. 30-50 in 4th takes 9.7
> secs, which they mention is 0.1sec slower than the 1.4 R19TSE. That
> IS worrying!
To my mind, this proves how silly it can be just looking at certain
performance figures, without taking into account how you drive.
I'm certain that no driver of a 16V car would be in 4th gear to
overtake at 30-50 mph. I guess this is the middle to upper part
of 2nd gear range.......
I'd look at the in-gear times that A&M usually do for each 20 mph
increment; I guess you'd find that 90-110 is probably as fast as
the 30-50 range......
Peter.
|
1179.28 | Beleive your senses not your magazines | UKCSSE::RDAVIES | I can't tryp for nots | Fri Feb 01 1991 16:22 | 19 |
| >> <<< Note 1179.27 by HEWIE::RUSSELL "Well, it was here a minute ago..." >>>
>> > The performance is poor considering we're talking 137bhp. You need to
>> > get past 4000rpm to get "real" acceleration. 30-50 in 4th takes 9.7
>> > secs, which they mention is 0.1sec slower than the 1.4 R19TSE. That
>> > IS worrying!
>>I'm certain that no driver of a 16V car would be in 4th gear to
>>overtake at 30-50 mph. I guess this is the middle to upper part
>>of 2nd gear range.......
I certainly would, unless I wanted to do it quicker! It depends on the
circumstances. I bet not everybody with a turbo goes down to second
gear to overtake either!.
But I do agree, figures are meaningless unless in context the 1.4
R19TSE might have a quicker 30-50 in 4th, but not in 3rd or 2nd.
Richard
|
1179.29 | 16 valve in Weldale | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Fri Feb 22 1991 13:05 | 9 |
| Weldale in Reading now have a 19 16 valve in their showroom if anyone
is interested. Had a quick look over it last Saturday and it looks
pretty good - they've done a good job of adding the body kit to what is
basically an ugly car.
Anyone had a go in one yet - if so whats the verdict performance wise,
'coz I may well be interested in one if my Turby doesn't get rebuilt.
Spike.
|
1179.30 | Go for it! | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Feb 22 1991 13:19 | 3 |
| Go on Spike, get a test drive and let us know what you think :-)
- Roy
|
1179.31 | 16 INTO 19 ? | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Mar 04 1991 09:23 | 11 |
| Have you seen the R19 16v posters on the roadside advertising boards ?
Its the one with the caption "16 INTO 19 DOES GO".
Are they inferring that normally 16 into 19 doesn't go ?
Think about it for a mo. When I was at school 16 into 19 went 1 and 3
over. Maybe the caption should be 19 into 16 does go, but then they are
not advertising an R16 with 19 valves !
I think the marketing boys at Renault have got their "sums" wrong.
- Roy
|
1179.32 | Specialist subject, the bleeding obvious! | SHIPS::SAXBY_M | You've got a WHAT in there?!?! | Mon Mar 04 1991 09:24 | 5 |
|
Maybe the "DOES GO" implies lots of motion? A sort of mathematical
play on words?
Mark
|
1179.33 | I want one! | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Fri Mar 08 1991 10:43 | 18 |
| Took a 16 Valve 19 for a test drive last night and in the short time I
had it I was very impressed. Holds the road better than a 5 GTT, the power
steering is excellent, gears are good. The only thing it lacks is the
"go" of the 5 but I expected that and I reckon I could live it (must be
getting old!). It only had 70 miles on the clock when I got hold of it
so I guess it would still have a fair bit of loosening up to do and I'd
expect it to perform better later on. One thing I did find was there
seemed to be a bit of a flat spot between 1st and 2nd, but maybe it
needed a few more revs - the salesman cringed everytime I took it
towards the red line - so I couldn't push it too hard to find out what
it could really do.
Overall very impressed - just depends on what sort of price the quote
comes in at as to whether I go for it.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.34 | Ouch!!! | HEWIE::RUSSELL | IBM (I've been moved) to F11/2! | Fri Mar 08 1991 11:23 | 8 |
| re .33;
I'm surprised the salesman didn't stop the car and throw you out!!
Taking it towards the red line with only 70 miles on the clock? I know modern
engines don't need to be as carefully run in nowadays, but even so....
Peter.
|
1179.35 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:35 | 21 |
| �.33 <HAMPS::MADELEY_T "I'm just F.I.N.E.">
Spike, pleased to hear you've had a drive at last. One thing that might
be worth considering - The 16v clio will be available around september
time I understand. If its out and out performance you're after this
looks to be the beasty.
Maybe its worth taking over a car that just has
a few months to run on the lease so you can check it out (I know a guy
here who wants someone to take-over his 5GTT, I was very tempted - see
# 256.725)
I like the idea of the 19 16v as its a comparable size to the XR3i I
currently drive (but not for much longer, the RS comes a week
Thursday). The 6 speaker audio option with satellite control sounds
like a very good idea, as does ABS (don't know about the leather seats
though).
Keep us informed on your decision.
- Roy
|
1179.36 | | NSDC::SIMPSON | The Clot Thickens... | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:45 | 8 |
| RE: -.1
>> Thursday). The 6 speaker audio option with satellite control sounds
>> like a very good idea,
OK, I'll bite - what on earth is this (explained simply!)
Steve
|
1179.37 | simply put | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Tue Mar 12 1991 15:56 | 12 |
| Re: -1.
Simply put it means a stereo with 6 speakers and another stick on the
steering column to turn up the volume, change channels etc. Doesn't
sound quite as impressive though does it!!!
Re: -2. How long has the 5GTT got left to run - if not too long I may
be interested.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.38 | More details in the mail, Spike | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Tue Mar 12 1991 17:13 | 5 |
| �How long has the 5GTT got left to run
I think its got about a year to run so it may be too long.
- Roy
|
1179.39 | 16v | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Thu Mar 14 1991 17:09 | 19 |
| I've just been looking through a brochure for the 16v.
Very impressed with equipment levels. Particularly the remote
locking,leccy s/roof and trip computer. I've already mentioned that I
like the 6 speaker stereo option.
I've never liked the look of the 19 (or many french cars come to that),
but the spoilers, wheels and air intake in the bonnet improve the look
significantly.
If I hadn't already ordered the RS, this would definately be next on
the list. (I don't wish to pay too much extra on the lease and other
cars in this class cost over a grand a year (ie 16v Astra etc.)
I'm a bit sceptical about catalytic coverters (which the 19 has as
standard) as it reduces performance and can give off a 'bad egg' smell
because of the reaction of sulphur in the petrol.
- Roy
|
1179.40 | | BAHTAT::FORCE4::hilton | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Thu Mar 14 1991 17:29 | 8 |
| What is Renaults quoted 0-60?
The 2 tests I've seen varied from 7.8 to 9.?
cheers,
Greg
|
1179.41 | Re.-1 | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Mar 15 1991 09:08 | 5 |
| �What is Renaults quoted 0-60?
The brochure quoted 8.5 secs.
- Roy
|
1179.42 | Get this! | KERNEL::LOAT | Keep passing the open windows... | Fri Mar 15 1991 13:26 | 9 |
| What Car tested it, and came back with a 0-60 time of 7.4 seconds!!!
Considering that the 16v Clio is only thought to be introduced at a few
pounds cheaper, the 16v 19 looks amazing value for money.
Steve.
PS. What Car rated it over the Golf GTI 16v.
|
1179.43 | Quick-ish | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Fri Mar 15 1991 13:43 | 18 |
|
Performance Car say they now rate the 19 16v as the top hot hatch,
displacing the 309 GTi. Said that the 19 could be bought with ABS for
less than the price of the standard 309 GTi or Golf GTi.
Good article in this months issue. Think they made 8.2 or similar for
the 0-60 dash -- not a concern to me, so I forgot it. Remember that the
0-100 time was good though ....
Some concern expressed about lack of mid-range torque. Suspect that
means you have it row it along on the gear lever, like the Golf 16v.
Looks pretty. Wouldn't be surprised if the price rises rapidly
as soon as market acceptance exists.
|
1179.44 | All top end. | SHIPS::SAXBY_M | Smoke me a kipper... | Fri Mar 15 1991 14:16 | 7 |
|
>> Some concern expressed about lack of mid-range torque. Suspect that
>> means you have it row it along on the gear lever, like the Golf 16v.
Like ANY 16v engine.
Mark
|
1179.45 | 16v not necc = gearbox happy | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Sat Mar 16 1991 14:25 | 15 |
|
Re -1
Absolutely not so. Some 16v's are perfectly adequate in the mid-range.
That's one of the reasons I still have my Mazda 626 16v after 65000
miles & 3 years -- should have been changed by now, but I like it too
much to bother .........
Pulls hard at any rpm from 2500 up. Pulling very hard when the rev
limiter cuts in @ 6900!
Integrale 16v that I sometimes drive is also fine, but Jetta 16v is
not good -- quick enough, if you want to chase around up & down the
box like a boy racer. I drive vehicles like that on circuits -- don't
need it on the road.
|
1179.46 | | SHIPS::SAXBY_M | Smoke me a kipper... | Mon Mar 18 1991 08:38 | 7 |
|
Re -1
Don't know about the Mazda, but the Integrale's grunt is more likely
due to it's turbo-charger than it's 16 valves.
Mark (16v <> Turbo)
|
1179.47 | Turbo helps | WOTVAX::MEAKINS | Clive Meakins | Mon Mar 18 1991 08:41 | 4 |
| > Integrale 16v that I sometimes drive is also fine, but Jetta 16v is
The Integrale 16V would have reasonable mid-range, it's got a turbo!
The Astra/Cavalier 16V has a decent mid-range (without cat).
|
1179.48 | In-Flight Report Wanted | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Thu May 16 1991 10:21 | 6 |
| Has anybody actually taken delivery of one of these beasties yet ? (The
Renault, I mean). I'm sure we'd all be interested in a long term
report. But make it good, as I've just ordered the saloon, and I don't
want to find I've made a mistake !!!
Colin
|
1179.49 | Looked quite nice.. | VOGON::MORGAN | If only... | Thu May 16 1991 10:24 | 10 |
| There are two convertible versions of 19 available September'ish this
year.
One based on the TXE and t'other on the 16v. Both on the hatchback body
shell.
Piccys etc. etc. in this months What Car.
Rich
|
1179.50 | 19 GTD Touchdown... | IOSG::SEATON | Ian Seaton, Bug Busters | Tue May 21 1991 11:35 | 54 |
|
RE: .48
I wasn't sure if you wanted to know about the 16V beastie or just the
Renault 19 XXX Chamade. Anyway I've had my Chamade for 13 months now, I've got
the GTD i.e. the diesel version of the GTS trim level except I asked for the
Ergonomics and Electrics kit which nearly makes it a TX?.
Problems:
1. The radio was wired in wrongly, faded FR to RL and balanced FL to RR!
2. Two diesel injectors developed leaks spraying diesel around the engine.
3. The boot leaked copiously in heavy rain
4. The sunroof developed a leak
5. The little windbreak that pops up when the sunroof is opened vibrates at
speeds greater than 50-60 MPH.
It's difficult to write about the good things because you only ever remember
the problems but I've had it 13 months, I've done 45,000 miles, the Dealer
(City Motors (Bristol) Ltd) have always been courteous and barring a little
misunderstanding about the boot leak, efficient.
To expand a little about the problems,
1. I fixed myself, quick screwdriver and wiring plan job
2. Disconcerting but according to the driver of the pickup truck who "rescued"
me from the M4 "...not unusual in a new car..."
3. The boot problem is the only REAL problem that I would say has bothered me,
they took 4 attempts to fix it, replacing seals and refitting the boot lid.
4. The sunroof they ripped out and replaced... no further problem.
5. I removed the windbreak with no noticeable effect other than the quietness.
One thing that has sprung to mind is how much load it can carry! Being a booted
car I was expecting to have to use my wife's Golf if we ever had to move things
but the only real loss is in the height of the load area, it is limited by the
parcel shelf. You can fold the rear seats down to give enough room to fit in a
six foot bedframe or even take the whole of the back seat backrests out for an
extra 3-4 inches of headroom.
Now some probably irrelevant comments on the engine, being diesel it's quite
noisy but it pulls reasonably well, I can't claim the Mestro 100MPG/100MPH but
I've had 59MPG and 105MPH(from the clock) (both on the continent :-)).
All in all, I've been very happy with the car, doing the miles I do I have to
get it serviced virtually every month (diesel service every 5000) so I've had
quite a few opportunities to compare the Renault with Escort/Orions/
Cavaliers/Sierras and although the Cavaliers/Sierras are probably nicer to
drive when the have the 1.8l engines, smaller engined ones and the
Escort/Orions don't really have that much of an advantage, if any IMHO. In fact
I would give a VERY negative assessment to the new shape Escort 1.6 Ghia.
A perfectly resonable car as long as you don't get fed up with reinforming
those who still judge Renault on their reputation of 5-10 years ago!
Ian.
|
1179.51 | 16V Diesel - sounds fast ! | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Tue May 28 1991 14:54 | 15 |
| re:50
Actually, I was interested in the 16V Chamade. However, thank-you for
and interesting reply !! Performance shouldn't be a problem ;-) The
sunroof is electric, and I don't think has the deflector. As for the
boot, p'haps I'll acquire some pet ducks. Thanks for the feedback.
As an aside, it seems interesting that there are loads of notes asking
about the 16V, hatch or saloon, but nobody else has owned up to
ordering/receiving one. The dealers are suggesting that they're selling
like hot cakes. And who ever met a car dealer that told porkies ;-)
Rgds
Colin
|
1179.52 | HAMPS::MADELEY_T where are you ? | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | RS with the RS | Tue May 28 1991 16:05 | 1 |
| Spike was going to order one.
|
1179.53 | Try Balldocks in Bracknell for a test drive | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Tue May 28 1991 19:56 | 15 |
| I did eventually manage to order the 16v hatch version last week
following months of delays after having my 5GTT stolen and written off.
I went for metallic blue with the remote stereo option - seemed better
value for money at �647 than the non-metallic with ordinary stereo at
�620. Hopefully it will be delivered on Aug 1st - so you'll have to
wait a couple of months for a review from me. Anybody else got a nearer
delivery date or got one now?
I did manage to get a test drive of both the hatch and Chamade versions
eventually but obviously not from a certain Reading dealer who seems to
hate anything to do with Digital. I certainly won't be taking my new
car anywhere near them for servicing or anything else. I found that the
dealer in Bracknell is very helpful when it comes to test drives even if
you own up to it being a company car (which we all do of course ;->).
|
1179.54 | Baldocks # number | BAHTAT::BAHTAT::HILTON | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Wed May 29 1991 13:47 | 4 |
| I got my R5 Gtt from Baldock. They seem very helpful. You can get them
on Bracknell 54444
Greg
|
1179.55 | Well, mine's here | METSYS::DBATES | Ho hum | Thu May 30 1991 10:54 | 30 |
| I ordered the hatchback about a month ago with an estimated delivery date of
early July. (Options of ABS and 6 speaker ICE).
Well it actually arrived yesterday (May 30). The guy who delivered
it said they couldn't sell them quickly enough and they were turning them over
very quickly.
First impressions are very good. Only had it 12 hours and the one gripe so far
is that they didn't supply the correct radio manual.
Apparently peak performance isn't reached until 1000 miles have been covered,
and you're not supposed to go over 3500 rpm until 500 miles have been done
(250 so far).
There is also a rev limiter fitted which cuts in at 7000 rpm, (haven't tested it
yet though !)
Trip computer is a nice toy, telling you distance travelled and average mpg/mph
at the press of a button on the end of the windscreen wiper stalk.
All sorts of unrecognisable bits under the bonnet (compared to my previous car
an Uno).
Reports I've read say the dash is dull and boring. Seems fine to me with plenty
of clear instruments and indicators.
Haven't had it long enough to give a decent driving report, but will try and
remember to give one later.
Cheers,
David
|
1179.56 | consumption | IOSG::HUNTD | millions of small people | Thu Jun 06 1991 14:45 | 5 |
| So what is the mileage per gallon figure like then David?
diana
|
1179.57 | The story so far? | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Fri Jun 14 1991 17:26 | 9 |
| So David what is your opinion so far - are you happy with your choice?
Can we have a blow by blow account of the story so far? I've ordered
one for delivery on Aug 1st, so I would like to hear the good things and
the bad so that I can know what to expect. I hear that the latest
models have a different stereo - any ideas on this?
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.58 | Latest story. | SYSTEM::DBATES | Ho hum | Fri Jun 21 1991 15:29 | 71 |
| Hi Spike,
Well I've now done 1200 miles in the car and I think you'll be pleased with your
choice.
Good points:
i. Performance
ii. Sticks to the road like it's on rails
iii. Large boot
iv. Electric sunroof
v. Trip computer
vi. ICE (I went for the Phillips six speaker Hi-Fi option)
vii. Doesn't leak (I gather from other notes this has been a problem on some
cars)
viii. Brakes are very good (discs all round and ABS option)
ix. Very quiet at speed
The not so good points I've found so far are:
i. Rear visibility is not too good.
ii. Fuel economy (I've so far only managed 28 mpg)
iii. Fuel gauge.
iv. Ventilation
The main gripe at the moment is fuel economy. I should be able to average about
35 mpg according to figures I'v read. I don't believe I drive it particularly
hard, but I've only managed 28mpg so far. The trip computer mpg figure matches
very closely my own measurement (filling up and seeing how many miles you've
covered when you next fill up). The trip actually indicate six things:
fuel left in gallons (down to 1 gallon)
miles to go before you need a fill up
miles travelled since last reset
average speed since reset
average mpg since reset
outside temp in degrees F.
I guess the the French version does it all in kilometres, litres and degrees C.
One thing that's worth bearing in mind; You only have the trip computer to
indicate how much fuel you have left. It gives a readout to the nearest tenth
of a gallon e.g. 2.5g. Once you go below 1.0 g, however, the trip goes off and
a low petrol indicator comes on. When this happens, I advise you to fill up
asap. I didn't, and covered what I thought was about 15 miles, and ran out ;had
to walk three miles ;(
The grip on the road is very good. It seems to like going round bends. The
tires are very low profile (195/50) but as a result the clearance off the ground
is very small. The front spoiler is only milimetres away from the kerb when I
park at work. Looks like it's hoovering up the gravel on the path.
I'd recommend going for the 6-Speaker Philips Hi-Fi option. Being able to change
station and volume without taking your hands off the wheel is a real boon. The
sound quality is also excellent.
The only other minor gripe is ventilation. There are numerous dials and
positions to set them to control incoming airflow. I haven't managed so far to
find a good combination. Not too bad so far, but if the weather ever hots up,
it could be a problem.
But overall I'm very pleased with the car. I've never owned a "hot hatch"
before. I have driven a Pug 205 1.6 for a while, and the Renault certainly
feels and performs better IMHO.
Bet you can't wait until August.
Anyone else ordered one ?
Cheers,
David
|
1179.59 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Fri Jun 21 1991 15:59 | 4 |
| Degrees F? Can't you fix that?
Jeff.
|
1179.60 | | IEDUX::jon | She keeps the Moet et Chandon in a pretty cabinet... | Fri Jun 21 1991 16:11 | 9 |
| Re .59
Also, now that fuel is sold in litres in this country, maybe that would be a
more useful unit than gallons?
As we change units, manufacturers are going to have to update their
localisation for the UK market...
Jon
|
1179.61 | Cheers | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Fri Jun 21 1991 16:45 | 9 |
|
Well thanks for that David - most encouraging. And as you say I can't
wait until August so that I have a new toy to play with!!!
Keep us informed on any new developments.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.62 | 0-60 9.1 secs???? | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | | Mon Jul 08 1991 14:04 | 6 |
| Well Autocar and Motor give the car another slating about its
performance in 3rd july issue although apart from that they loved it
Can anybody put the record straight on performance as these >9.1 secs
for 0-60 is very average.
Regards Martin
|
1179.63 | latest score 8.2 | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Mon Jul 08 1991 14:10 | 8 |
| Saw another review at lunch time in Sports Car magazine or something to
that effect and they quoted 8.2 for 0-60.
Cheers,
Spike.
PS. David, can you tell me what the first service interval is please?
|
1179.64 | 6000 miles | SYSTEM::DBATES | Ho hum | Mon Jul 08 1991 15:24 | 10 |
| First service is at 6000 miles.
RE : A few back about the radio manual.
I rang Renault Croydon about my radio manual again, and they say that
all 19/16V models have been sent out with the wrong manual. They are
currently awaiting a stock load from France.
...
David
|
1179.65 | Don't trust benchmarks! | TASTY::JEFFERY | Make a new plan Stan | Mon Jul 08 1991 18:52 | 9 |
| Until they get a SPECmark for cars, it is probably best not to use
0-60 speeds as a measure of performance.
Best to try and drive it to see what you think.
FWIW The Clio 1.4RT has bad performance figures, but feels really fast,
and responsive. Given that the car is quiet, it must perform pretty well.
Mark.
|
1179.66 | | LARVAE::MUNSON_P | Japan is special for that.... | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:24 | 1 |
| What Car? got 7.5 secs 0-60.....
|
1179.67 | | HUGS::AND_KISSES | Scott Marshall | Tue Jul 09 1991 14:50 | 10 |
| 0-60 times depend on the specific test car you've got, and how good the test
driver is.
It's a stupid performance figure anyway; how often do you need to do 0-60
that fast?! Better and more useful figures are 30-50 and 50-70.
Even better is ignore all the figures and just drive it yourself and see what
you think!
Scott
|
1179.68 | Is it the first? | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Thu Aug 01 1991 11:28 | 8 |
| Well people - the Spikemobile is back in business - a cute little
metallic blue R19 16V is now sitting in the car park. Lets see how long
this one lasts before it gets stolen!
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.69 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | AKA Wry Shyly | Thu Aug 01 1991 12:16 | 3 |
| Well done Spike.
Who's got a 'J' plate then :-)
|
1179.70 | Seen in passing .... | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Fri Aug 02 1991 12:55 | 11 |
| ....my drive, a shiny new Renault 19 16V Saloon.
Whose could it be, oh yes, it's mine !!
20+ miles later what can I say, except that I ca't wait until it is run
in !
Question - with regards to petrol, what do the panel thing: ordinary 95
RON unleaded, or the supercharged 98 RON variety ??
Colin
|
1179.71 | Sick as a parrot... | WARNUT::RICE | I love the car scheme changes - honestly ! | Fri Aug 02 1991 15:41 | 15 |
| >> Question - with regards to petrol, what do the panel thing: ordinary 95
>> RON unleaded, or the supercharged 98 RON variety ??
Colin,
if you mean to pour over it to light it, then I'd recommend Paraffin
actually. :-)
Seriously though, I'm just jealous because my car was cancelled and
yours wasn't.
Stevie.
PS. If you find Metallic Grey scrapes down the side at about Granada
height, theyre nothing to do with me. :-) :-)
|
1179.72 | Go Faster Scratches | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Fri Aug 02 1991 16:09 | 15 |
| re: the Grey Metallic stripes.
Hey, Stevie, as long as they match the Tungsten Grey of my car that's
OK !!
If you fancy a drive next week, no problem. As long as it's not nicked
over the weekend !! The delivery drivery told me how he had one nicked
in London, 500 yards from where he had to deliver it. Apparently he
popped into a shop to check the directions. When he came out, it had
gone !! I bet he was popular !
I'm going to top up tonight on the way home with Asda's ordinary
unleaded. We'll see what happens. Wonder if my Cat' will get smelly ;-)
Colin
|
1179.73 | No difference on the GM 16v. | NEWOA::SAXBY | | Fri Aug 02 1991 16:13 | 7 |
|
Ok, it's not a Renault, but I've tried my Calibra on super-unleaded
and it didn't make a scrap of difference to the performance. As they
are similar engines, I wouldn't have thought it'll make much difference
to the 19 either, but I'd try both just to see.
Mark
|
1179.74 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Make a new plan Stan | Fri Aug 02 1991 17:45 | 1 |
| Similar in that they have four cylinders, 16 Valves and a cat!
|
1179.75 | Other similarities? | NEWOA::SAXBY | | Fri Aug 02 1991 17:51 | 4 |
|
And two cams and a 2 litre(ish) capacity?
Mark
|
1179.76 | ex | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Mon Aug 05 1991 11:29 | 20 |
| Well I've been running mine on ordinary unleaded since delivery 750
miles ago and it seems to go OK - in fact I can't see it running any
better on the super stuff, I reckon the only difference would be to
your pocket!
The only complaint I have so far is the smell from the cat! Do they
always smell so bad, or is it just because its new?
Any opinions on the running in front? The user guide reckons that after
500 miles you can run it as hard as you like but full performance won't
be available until after about 1500 miles. However, the chap at the garage
reckoned you should run it at no more than 4000 rpm until its first service
at 6000 miles. I don't particularly fancy waiting that long - although
at current rates of progress that will only be a couple of weeks away
'coz its so much fun even going relatively slowly.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.77 | smell gone now | METSYS::DBATES | Ho hum | Mon Aug 05 1991 11:57 | 10 |
| Mine smelt of bad eggs for a little while. It stopped though after about
500 miles. Another note in here somewhere explains that's it's all to do
with the absence of nickel in the cat. Something to do with Germany not
liking nickel in its cats.
It wasn't you yesterday on the M40 was it Spike, in convoy with me for
about 10 miles ?
David
|
1179.78 | Might have been | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Mon Aug 05 1991 12:17 | 9 |
| David,
Yep could have been me - I was going south between about 3-30 - 4-30pm.
Cheers,
Spike.
PS. What do you reckon on the running in front?
|
1179.79 | | DCC::HAGARTY | Essen, Trinken und Shaggen... | Mon Aug 05 1991 15:37 | 9 |
| Ahhh Gi'day...�
You should use Premium unleaded (=Super Bleifrei = 95) if the Manual
tells you to, the Super-Plus is an option. However, depending on how
smart the cars electronics are, you may get better performance out of
it, but at a clear cost. The new Audi I've just ordered has all it's
performance figures run using Super-Plus (98 ROZ), but it suggests on
the spec sheet only running it with 95, unless you need max speed,
torque and performance. What a dilemma?
|
1179.80 | overheating? | METSYS::GILROY | Carol Gilroy, DTN: 830-4179 | Wed Aug 21 1991 15:55 | 7 |
|
Has anybody had problems with the engine overheating in this hot weather?
Our 6-day-old Renault overheated yesterday - the warning light started
flashing, and the engine cut out. Coolant levels were fine.
Carol Gilroy
|
1179.81 | | VOGON::ATWAL | Maybe a Sun reader could tell us more... | Wed Aug 21 1991 16:18 | 13 |
| >>Has anybody had problems with the engine overheating in this hot weather?
oh dear, see the R5 GTturbo note about over heating :-)
It really is about time Renault learnt about shoving 'hot' engines into confined
spaces.
16v drivers will be complaining about hot starting and vapour lock problems
soon !!! :-)
...art
|
1179.82 | A VAX is a VAX is a Renault | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Wed Aug 21 1991 16:22 | 8 |
| Dare I say this - nope (not yet).
Question - how accurate is your (Renault) computer ? On mine, the Fuel
Guage is as accurate as any analogue device, the Miles Travelled tends
to disagree slightly with the analogue one, and the MPG is a tad
optimistic.
Colin
|
1179.83 | No worries | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Wed Aug 21 1991 16:38 | 6 |
| Nope - no problem with mine, and its spent a couple of hours in jams on the
M5 and M6 in hot weather.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.84 | MPG figures in town/long run ? | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Aug 21 1991 16:42 | 6 |
| Any more updates on mpg figures with the 16v 19 ?
The last time this was mentioned I seem to recall the figure 28mpg
which didn't sound too good.
- Roy
|
1179.85 | reason for overheating | METSYS::GILROY | Carol Gilroy, DTN: 830-4179 | Wed Aug 21 1991 16:53 | 5 |
| The cause of the overheating problem...
A faulty temperature sensor switch meant the fan was not switching on.
Carol
|
1179.86 | Saga continues... | DCC::MARTIN | The Corporate Rat... 865 3492 | Wed Aug 21 1991 17:49 | 7 |
|
I had a good one on the R5GTT the other week, it started going
critical for no apparent reason... new sensors, check the electrics,
but nothing fixed it... it turned out to be a bad airlock in the
cooling system... the heater also works now...! So much for the three
coolant changes that Welcrap and Duetsche Renault AG have performed...
give it to your brother I say...!
|
1179.87 | Slightly better mpg | DIBDIB::DBATES | Ho hum | Wed Aug 21 1991 18:09 | 11 |
| re: .84
MPG over the last 3500 miles has been 31.5
Better than 28 but still not brilliant.
Consumption goes up rapidly in town, and down rapidly on the motorway doing 70++
i.e. MPG increases rapidly away from town driving.
BTW
No overheating problems yet.
David
|
1179.88 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Wed Aug 21 1991 18:26 | 7 |
| �.86 ... the heater also works now...!
Pleased to hear you traced the problem to an just an airlock but
surely if the heater didn't work this is a BIG indication theres an
airlock.
- Roy
|
1179.89 | 34 and counting | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Wed Aug 21 1991 18:52 | 13 |
| I've had 34mpg over the last 1500 miles - half of that was in a weekend
run up the motorways to deepest North Wales and the other half between
Reading and Basingstoke daily.
All in all I can't complain 'coz the most I managed to get out of the
BX 16v I had before was about 28, and that was using 4 star rather
than unleaded.
Cheers,
Spike.
PS. Roy, if you wan't to take it for a spin sometime just let me know.
|
1179.90 | Siezed Engine Anyone?? | SIEVAX::MIDONA | Alan Midona, SIE Reading, DTN 830 3996 | Thu Aug 22 1991 12:38 | 14 |
| A friend of mine has the 16v, or should I say he had the 16v.
After only 3 months he managed to sieze the engine and it is
now in the guarage awaiting a new one (4500 pounds ouch!!).
Renault are refusing to do the repair under waranty claiming
that he was negligent in not topping up the oil. This is
dispite the fact that the oil warning light never came on.
Has anyone had similar problems with low oil level? Or siezed
engines even?
Cheers,
Alan
|
1179.91 | Bad news. | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Aug 22 1991 12:49 | 22 |
|
Ouch!
I suppose he should've checked the oil level (16 valve engines are
supposedly prone to burning oil in the early days of their life), but
it is very easy to forget all about your car if it's serviced
regularly.
Did the car loose the oil (was it dropping from a leak)? Don't 19s have
oil pressure gauges? I'd've thought that he should have noticed a fall
in oil pressure if it was sufficient to seize the engine simply due to
lack of oil. Remember that the light merely comes on when the oil
pressure gets very low, I had an engine wreck itself once when the
water all blew out of a duff top hose and overheated the engine. In
that case neither the water temperature gauge or the oil pressure light
showed any signs of trouble until the engine seized! If the pump failed
or the car sprang a major leak then Renault are to blame. If so he
should push hard on them.
If not someone is faced with a big bill! I hope the car is leased!
Mark
|
1179.92 | I hate dealers/manufactureres trying to crawl out like this | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An amateur expert | Thu Aug 22 1991 13:17 | 7 |
| I wouldn't let renault get away with that. Presumably he had the car
serviced by a dealer?, He should conter claim that the garage can't
have re-filled it properly as a loss of that amount is not normal for a
car over such a short period of time.
Richard
|
1179.93 | Wot no guage!! | SCOAYR::AGIBSON | | Thu Aug 22 1991 13:38 | 17 |
|
hi,
Does the 16v not have the oil level gauge in the instrument cluster,
or is this function performed by the on board computer in this model.
The lesser models have the gauge fitted and it make life very easy
to check the oil level.
Best idea is to stick to your guns with Renault,and insist its their
problem, this seems to be the only way to deal with them.
Alan.
|
1179.94 | | SIEVAX::CORNE | Sometimes you get the Elevator, sometimes the Shaft | Thu Aug 22 1991 14:22 | 6 |
| re .91,
its an oil level, not oil pressure. It only works when the engine is not
turning over.....(I guess this is also true of the dipstick ;-)
Jc
|
1179.95 | Daft if it isn't. | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Aug 22 1991 15:18 | 6 |
|
On the 5GTT it is a combined level and pressure gauge.
Is it not the same on the 16v 19?
Mark
|
1179.96 | | SIEVAX::MIDONA | Alan Midona, SIE Reading, DTN 830 3996 | Thu Aug 22 1991 15:22 | 13 |
| The car is leased and it had been serviced recently by a Renault
dealer. There are now a lot of paperwork flying between Renault,
PHH and his company while they try to figure out whose going to
pay.
I agree that it is a Renault problem. You shouldn't have to worry
about checking the oil level on a brand new car that has recently
been serviced. I know the 16v has a oil-level indicator in the
instrument panel, but how many people seriously check all those
things every time you enter the car? I guess that most of us just
stick the keys in the ignition and turn on without a second thought.
Alan
|
1179.97 | A hypercrit speaks... | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Thu Aug 22 1991 15:37 | 7 |
| �most of us just stick the keys in the ignition and turn on without a
�second thought.
Speak for yourself. Instruments are there for the driver. I suppose
"most of us" don't check their speedo, fuel gauge, temp gauge either.
- Roy (Hmmm, must check my oil sometime)
|
1179.99 | !! | VOGON::MORGAN | J.F.D.I. | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:04 | 4 |
| Yeah but when you're only popping out for some chips !!
Rich
|
1179.100 | :^) | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:05 | 8 |
|
Come on Rich!!!
That is the 'popping out for chips' list!!!!
Mark
|
1179.101 | | SIEVAX::MIDONA | Alan Midona, SIE Reading, DTN 830 3996 | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:13 | 7 |
| Company cars DO NOT need oil, water, air... etc
All they need is petrol and a new engine every 3 months.
:-)
Alan
|
1179.102 | | CRATE::RAWSON | Fnarr! Fnarr! | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:14 | 7 |
| > NEWOA::SAXBY "Aye. When I were a lad...."
Mark, you never were !
You've *always* been an *old* hack, isn't that right Jane ?
Alex :^)
|
1179.103 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:21 | 7 |
|
Eh up Alex,
I tell thee I were a lad afore ye had yur first car (When are you
getting a real car?) :^)
Mark
|
1179.105 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Fri Aug 23 1991 09:52 | 6 |
| Mr Mod.
Is he allowed to use phrases like 'region of origin' in a notes
conference?!
Mark
|
1179.106 | Check your oil level now ! | DIBDIB::DBATES | Ho hum | Fri Aug 23 1991 10:49 | 15 |
| STOP PRESS
RE: .90
I had a chat to a good friend last night whose colleague HAD a 19 16v.
His car "blew up" recently due to lack of oil.
It stopped working at the end of the A329(M) in Reading. Like .90, no
low oil level warning.
He also needs a new engine (cost 4500).
I'll post the exact details when I get them, but I know he has had the
car less than 3 months.
I suggest all 16v owners check their oil level NOW.
Cheers,
David
|
1179.107 | | NCEIS1::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux, Nice, 828-6995 | Fri Aug 23 1991 13:00 | 9 |
| .106� no
.106� low oil level warning.
I thought these things had an oil level meter that can be read when
turning the ignition key, just before starting the engine. There surely
must be an oil PRESSURE indication somewhere.
In case they don't provide these things I'd be reluctant to buy the car
at all.
|
1179.108 | extra warning needed | DIBDIB::DBATES | Ho hum | Fri Aug 23 1991 13:19 | 10 |
| RE -1
Yes there is a level indicator that works when you turn the ignition before
starting the engine. Once the engine is running, this gauge turns into an oil
pressure gauge. Usually though you don't (or at least I don't) have time to look
at the oil level gauge. I just switch the engine on.
I think the argument is that there should be an extra low level light that comes
on, in a similar vein to the low fuel light.
David
|
1179.109 | They make it easy. So you ignore it?!?!? | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Fri Aug 23 1991 13:22 | 5 |
|
If they give you a gauge which you don't bother looking at, you'll
probably tend to ignore a light too!
Mark
|
1179.110 | :-) | VOGON::MITCHELLE | Beware of the green meanie | Fri Aug 23 1991 15:22 | 4 |
|
...aren't these cars fitted with an oil dipstick...... I always find
them to be a reliable form of checking the oil level.
|
1179.111 | Seized engine or hot-start problem? | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Fri Aug 23 1991 15:32 | 14 |
|
Now, now Elaine.
You should realise by now that drivers of company cars are expressly
forbidden to lift the bonnets of their cars :^|
This explains why people like Renault put oil level gauges on their
dashboards.
Of course, it doesn't explain why the 16v Renault lunches itself in
the first 3 months! I bet these people wish they'd bought a
'troublesome' 5GTT! :^)
Mark
|
1179.112 | | SHIPS::ALFORD_J | an elephant is a mouse with an oper. sys. | Fri Aug 23 1991 15:38 | 5 |
|
> You should realise by now that drivers of company cars are expressly
> forbidden to lift the bonnets of their cars :^|
ooops, broken that one several times already :-)
|
1179.113 | | DIBDIB::DBATES | Ho hum | Fri Aug 23 1991 15:38 | 7 |
|
Well it now transpires that the car in .90 and .106 are one and the same
reported via different routes. But at least three other people with 16v
cars have reported unexpected large oil consumption.
Worth keeping an eye on.
dib
|
1179.114 | Pandorra's bonnet? | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Fri Aug 23 1991 16:02 | 6 |
|
Jane,
You're lucky no-one here reports you for that!!!!!
Mark
|
1179.115 | 19 any day | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Fri Aug 23 1991 16:28 | 7 |
| Well having had a 5 GTT in the past I know which one I'd pick next time
around and it wouldn't have 5 in it. Now if it came to a choice between
the 19 and the 16 valve Clio then it might be a bit more difficult.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.116 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Aug 26 1991 14:17 | 7 |
| �19 and the 16 valve Clio
Had chance to drive a 16 valve Clio yet Spike ?
Roy
PS what's the price difference between 16v 19 & clio ?
|
1179.117 | The first(ish) fault. | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Tue Aug 27 1991 09:13 | 14 |
| Foggy here this am, had to use my fog lights. Suprise suprise, the
nearside rear one isn't working. And it's only 2000 miles (three weeks)
old. Question - was it ever working ??!!
Colin
P.S. Why oh why do so many people not put their lights (any lights) on
in this weather.
P.P.S. Im collecting all the receipts for the petrol, when I've got
enough, and some time, I'll post a report on the MPG I'm getting.
Initial impressions suggest 33 overall, a lot less in pure town
driving, rather better on long motorway journeys. In short, highly
erratic !!
|
1179.118 | | SIEVAX::CORNE | Sometimes you get the Elevator, sometimes the Shaft | Tue Aug 27 1991 12:26 | 9 |
| re .117,
Funny that - on Saturday, I changed a faulty stop bulb in the LHS of my other
halfs R19 TSE. I noticed that the fog lamp was all wired up, but with no bulb
and with a piece of plastic blanking the hole. I put in a spare bulb to match
the one on the RHS and removed the plastic with a knife - voila, two fog lamps
now instead of one!
Jc
|
1179.120 | | WOTVAX::HARRISC | Not very nice at all | Tue Aug 27 1991 19:10 | 4 |
| This must be the same with most french cars, my PUG has a dummy LHS one
too - stupid really!
..Craig
|
1179.121 | Re: last few | DOOZER::JENKINS | seriously 'ken shabby | Wed Aug 28 1991 01:55 | 2 |
|
How cheap can you get??????
|
1179.122 | This cheap | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Wed Aug 28 1991 09:28 | 2 |
| Well, you could get an R5 GTT ....;-) Or a Fiasco RS Turbot, or an
XR3why, or ......;-) ;-)
|
1179.123 | I haven't the foggiest... | WARNUT::RICE | I love the car scheme changes - honestly ! | Wed Aug 28 1991 12:47 | 18 |
| Re: the last few.
The law only requires that you have one rear foglight, my dads 1978
Granada only had one as well, until he did likewise and went out to buy
a bulb etc. There is a rumour that ONLY one will be the rule in
future, a reasonable idea because it's then less easy to mistake brakes
for fogs and run up the back of someone !!
Q: While I'm on the subject (** rathole alert **) You know what winds me
up ?
A: People who think that just because it's raining it's a good idea to
put on their fog lamps (illegal except in fog) thus turning everything
into a sort of "red mist". This makes it impossible to see the other
(also illegal) people saving electricity by only putting on their
sidelights instead of headlights %-(
Stevie. (Who as a biker as well wonders why so many car drivers don't
see me even though my headlamp is on ALL THE TIME I'm on the bike ?)
|
1179.124 | Light - hearted Non R19 trivia | UNTADC::LEWIS | FinestKind Data Warehouse and EDI Tea Supplier | Wed Aug 28 1991 14:33 | 20 |
| Stevie,
Unfortunately, the law insn't so specific. (From memory) it
includes Fog, Snow and Conditions of limited visibility, which requires
motorists to decide what they consider to be limited.
I agree that I *hate* people who use them in the rain, particularly
when riding the bike.
As for using your bike headlight all the time, don't bother. The only
time I ever had a car run into me, I had *both* my headlights on.
The driver was a little old lady with her neck in a brace - she
couldn't turn her head to look down the road before she pulled out.
Riding with no lights reinforces your feeling of vulnerability, and
therefore makes *you* more aware of the danger posed by motor car
drivers.
There you go, one rathole :-)
Amad�n
|
1179.125 | MVHO as usual | HUGS::AND_KISSES | Scott Marshall | Wed Aug 28 1991 14:42 | 12 |
| re .123 and others
I don't like cars with only one foglight... In conditions of very poor
visibility, it makes me think I'm following a motorbike!
I think it would be silly to make "only one" the rule... I think the current
law, whereby fog lamps have to be >100mm from the brake lamps, is sufficient.
Spending money on educationg drivers on when to use them would be better than
wasting it on a silly change to the law...
Scott
|
1179.126 | Whats wrong with bikes ? | SUBURB::VEALES | Simon Veale - DEC Park, Reading | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:22 | 6 |
| >> I don't like cars with only one foglight... In conditions of very poor
>> visibility, it makes me think I'm following a motorbike!
So ??
|
1179.127 | Lame excuse of the week....... | SWEEP::PREECE | It's all right, they're only electrons.... | Wed Aug 28 1991 18:42 | 29 |
|
A few days ago, I was driving (fortunately, quite slowly) past a line of
queued-up cars going the other way, or rather, not going the other way.
(pay attention, it does make sense)
It was night, and I had my lights on. Headlights, not sides.
The man at the back of the queue decided that he wanted to be nearer the front,
since (it turned out later) that somebody in another car had impugned his
virility by driving faster than him, so he wished to rearrange his features
for him.....and he decided to use my bit of road instead.
After I stopped (fortunately, they have nice wide pavements in that bit of
Dorset), I remonstrated with the gentleman, on his way to partake in fisticuffs
with the driver he'd blocked in place.....
"Werl, I saw the lights, but I fought you was two bl**din' bikes, din' I ?"
10 out of ten for imagination........
aaaagh !
Ian
|
1179.128 | | HUGS::AND_KISSES | Scott Marshall | Thu Aug 29 1991 15:03 | 17 |
| re .126
Nothing wrong with motorbikes! (If someone gave me a Triumph one I'd be
delighted! :-)
But it is useful to know what type of vehicle is in front, as you then have a
better idea of what it's likely to do...
Also, you have a better idea where the vehicle is: A single light near the
outside of the lane implies a motorbike about to pull out for some reason
rather than a car sitting centrally in a lane.
Why do you think lorries have to have so many marker lights? So you can see
the vehicle's outline in the dark! Why should the same logic not apply for fog
lights?
Scott
|
1179.129 | not yet roy | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Fri Aug 30 1991 00:42 | 9 |
| Well I haven't managed to get a test drive of a 16v Clio yet - but I
have seen one in the flesh close up and it looks really neat apart from
the silly pattern on the seats. Also seen at the same garage a white
convertible 16v 19 - now you're talking neat!!!
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.130 | Wow! | KERNEL::LOAT | Hasta la vista, baby!!! | Fri Aug 30 1991 14:22 | 5 |
|
Was there a price on the convertible 16v 19?
Steve.
|
1179.131 | �15160 (LHD) | KAZAN::HOPE | Stephen Hope pas 7UP | Wed Sep 11 1991 09:31 | 3 |
| The model on display on the Champs Elysee costs FF151600 I believe.
Steve
|
1179.132 | Servicing a 19 16v | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Tue Oct 08 1991 17:55 | 7 |
| Anyone know of anywhere that services Renaults around the Basingstoke
area, and no Weldale in Reading would not qualify if it was the last
place on earth.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.133 | 16V's continue to blow asunder..... | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Tue Oct 08 1991 20:26 | 21 |
|
Re .90 et al -- 19 16v engines collapsing ...
My little boy has just had his first company car go bang ....
16V with 3000 miles on the clock. Engine totalled, with no advance
warning. Wrecked camshaft, crankshaft, ends, one liner etc. New engine
to be fitted by Renault.
Local sources talk of several other known low-mileage disasters.
Rumoured to be a function of the oil used by Renault at delivery time.
Baldocks in Bracknell supply a warning letter on delivery to new
owners. Covers in detail the specific running-in needs for the lump.
Certain others don't -- in fact, my son was told it didn't need
running-in!!
PHH confirm they have had several other similar instances in recent
weeks.
Colin
|
1179.134 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Wed Oct 09 1991 10:03 | 10 |
| � owners. Covers in detail the specific running-in needs for the lump.
� Certain others don't -- in fact, my son was told it didn't need
� running-in!!
This seems to be a common statement from garages/manufacturers these
days, but I certainly wouldn't thrash a new car until it had a couple
of K on the clock. I don't believe that manufacturing tolerances are
that good yet.
Mark
|
1179.135 | | FORTY2::BETTS | X.500 Development | Wed Oct 09 1991 10:10 | 4 |
|
Certainly Renault's tolerances wouldn't appear to be that good...
William.
|
1179.136 | | CHEST::RUTTER | Sixteen wheels, sixteen cylinders | Wed Oct 09 1991 10:15 | 5 |
| � Certainly Renault's tolerances wouldn't appear to be that good...
What about the tolerance of Renault owners ?
J.R.
|
1179.137 | Bring back pushrods! | NEWOA::SAXBY | Aye. When I were a lad.... | Wed Oct 09 1991 10:22 | 5 |
|
It's all these bloody thrashy 16 valve engines the Japs forced on us!
:^)
Mark
|
1179.138 | | FORTY2::BETTS | X.500 Development | Wed Oct 09 1991 10:25 | 5 |
|
I think the mechanical tolerance of Renault drivers is exemplary.
It has to be!
William.
|
1179.139 | :-) | NSDC::SIMPSON | Sit 'n' Bull | Wed Oct 09 1991 15:16 | 7 |
| RE: -.1
I think that William's-Renault engine has been excellent this year, it is the
rest of the team that needs looking at. Ooops - this ISN'T the Formula 1 note?
Sorry....
Steve
|
1179.140 | Baldock's oil advice | DIBDIB::DBATES | Ballooning over Berkshire | Fri Oct 11 1991 13:59 | 22 |
| Well I've just had my first service at Baldock's of Bracknell.
There was a notice on the passenger seat when I collected the car.
It says:
<<
IMPORTANT NOTICE
________________
WITH REFERENCE TO YOUR NEW RENAULT 19 16 VALVE.
CAN YOU PLEASE KEEP A REGULAR CHECK ON YOUR OIL AND COOLANT LEVELS
AS PER YOUR SERVICE BOOK INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 52.
THIS MUST BE CHECKED AT LEAST PER 500 MILES AND TOPPED UP ACCORDINGLY.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR CO-OPERATION.
>>
I wonder if this is a standard memo from Renault, or if Baldock's are
noticing a large number of low oil leveled cars.
David
|
1179.141 | Baldock's seem clued up | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Sat Oct 12 1991 17:17 | 16 |
|
It's Baldock's. Renault have not put out any nation-wide advice (info
from a chum who just happens to be Customer Services Mgr Renault UK)
I suggested Renault might like to get off their behind & do something
about it. My youngster is well cross that his dis-integrated with no
heavier driving than he gave his Fiat Uno Turbo. It has made me doubt
getting a 16V for myself -- previously the only doubt was that I only
like the blue colour that he has, & I didn't want him nicking mine just
'cos it had more fuel in the tank. "Sorry, Dad, didn't realise it was
yours" & all that stuff.
A social friend in PHH tells us they are considering pulling the 16V
off their lists if the situation does not improve very quickly.
Colin
|
1179.142 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Mon Oct 14 1991 14:50 | 4 |
| Anyone got/getting a 'new' quote for the Renault 19 16V? I'd be
interested to see what it would cost.
Greg
|
1179.143 | | LEECHS::hilton | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Fri Nov 15 1991 14:57 | 11 |
| Hmm!
VTX seems to change without warning
as of 15:00 15/11/91
077 RENAULT 19 16V 3DR H/B 815 6 N/A S S
S 207 45 S S N/A S 86
Greg
|
1179.144 | Renault official warning | BAHTAT::HILTON | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:42 | 6 |
| Went and sat in a 19 16V, at a garage yesterday , they had a sticker in
the right hand side of the windsreen saying (misquote) "Check oil levels
before every trip or knacker your engine"
Greg
|
1179.145 | | VOGON::ATWAL | dream out loud | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:44 | 6 |
| re.14
right next to the sticker that says "Renault build a better car"...
...art
|
1179.146 | Gone, but not forgotten. | NEWOA::SAXBY | Is Bart Simpson the anti-Christ? | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:49 | 4 |
|
They did!
Mark
|
1179.147 | Some good | BAHTAT::HILTON | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Tue Nov 26 1991 14:50 | 9 |
| re .146
> They did!
Still do occasionally, quite like the R19, probably the best
price/performance car on the new company car list and will earn a test
drive from me!
Greg
|
1179.148 | next time you're bored | DIBDIB::DBATES | Ballooning over Berkshire | Tue Nov 26 1991 16:14 | 10 |
| Ok team; can someone solve an argument I'm having at home at the moment?
Is the blue Renault 19 in the current advert on tv a 16v or not?
It certainly has the spoiler kit, but does it have an air intake on the
bonnet?
I haven't managed to video the advert yet to look closely. If you have
a chance, tell me what you think.
Cheers,
David
|
1179.149 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | There are always options | Tue Nov 26 1991 16:26 | 8 |
| RE: The advert.
It definately looks like the 16v to me.
Spike's the man with a met blue 16v. What do think mate ?
Roy
|
1179.150 | | VOGON::ATWAL | dream out loud | Tue Nov 26 1991 16:37 | 9 |
| >> It certainly has the spoiler kit, but does it have an air intake on the
>> bonnet?
very early LHD models did not have this bonnet air intake, current ones do, so
this car most propbably is a 16v one
...art
|
1179.151 | ;-) | FORTY2::BETTS | X.500 Development | Tue Nov 26 1991 16:39 | 7 |
|
But did you notice in the advert how the driver was rash enough to
get in and drive the car away, without checking the oil level first!
Asking for trouble...
William.
|
1179.152 | Someone else's problem! | NEWOA::SAXBY | Is Bart Simpson the anti-Christ? | Tue Nov 26 1991 17:08 | 4 |
|
Ah, wasn't his car though was it?!?!? :^)
Mark
|
1179.153 | Couple questions | BAHTAT::HILTON | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Wed Nov 27 1991 12:08 | 11 |
| Looking at the price list the saloon and hatchback R19 16V are the same
price, but the brochure says the saloon actually has more cubic feet
available as boot space.
Does this mean less passenger leg room?
Does the R19 16V get a height adjustable drivers seat?
Cheers,
Greg
|
1179.154 | Loadsa room! | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Wed Nov 27 1991 13:40 | 14 |
| Re. Last
I don't know about the size of the boot on the saloon, but on the
hatchback it is bigger than almost anything else I've seen. Big enough
for 12 crates of lager, 40 odd bottles of wine and assorted other
goods, and plenty of room inside for 4 people and a few more crates of
beer.
Yes it does get height adjustable drivers seat, and also adjustable
steering column.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.155 | | LEECHS::hilton | How's it going royal ugly dudes? | Thu Nov 28 1991 09:13 | 9 |
| > Big enough
> for 12 crates of lager, 40 odd bottles of wine and assorted other
> goods, and plenty of room inside for 4 people and a few more crates of
> beer.
Not that you drink alot Spike!!
:^)
|
1179.156 | Just testing | HAMPS::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Thu Nov 28 1991 09:38 | 7 |
| Re. last
What me - naaaaaaaaaaaaah! Just wanted to test what a friend told me
about it being able to accelerate up hill from a ton ten in fifth with a
full load.... ;-)
Spike.
|
1179.157 | Renault 19 GTD | YOUWOT::BLACK | John & Jackie are free! Now the rest! | Mon Dec 09 1991 16:37 | 7 |
|
Hi,
Anybody got a RENAULT 19GTD? If you have what do you get to the
gallon and what's the build like, I've heard bad things about Renaults.
/Martin.
|
1179.158 | No major complaints from me | IOSG::SEATON | Ian Seaton, Bug Busters | Tue Dec 10 1991 10:11 | 24 |
| Hi,
Yes, I'll admit to driving a 19 GTD!! I wrote a note about it No:
1179.50 which goes into a little more detail. As to your particular
questions, I drove the car for 18 months/60,000 miles and apart from
the troubles noted in my other note the only other problems were
various irritating squeaks and rattles which are common to many cars.
I was driving Bristol<->Reading M4 and getting >43-44 MPG at fast
motorway speeds (70-80MPH). Dropping the speed by 10 MPH improved the
economy to >47-48 MPG. The best MPG I got was touring round France
30-50MPH leisurely non-town driving when I was getting just short of
60MPG!
I recently saw an article in Auto Express which placed the Renault
second to the new Rover 214 SD noting a powerful engine, it was certainly
nippier than any other non-turbo diesel I've tried.
If you're still worried by Renault's reputation then I'd recommend
you look at the diesel Rover 200/400 combining the classy Rover finish
with the excellent Peugeot/Citroen engines. I'm now driving a 218 SLD
Turbo and it's great!
Ian.
|
1179.159 | R19 16v 1st imp
| MINDER::POWELL | | Tue Dec 24 1991 12:26 | 44 |
|
Below is a list of the dislikes of the R19 16V after 1500 miles.
Likes:
o Build quality (last car was a Pug 205 1.9!!)
o Styling (The body kit makes all the difference)
o Motorway crusing ability
o Steering is simply the best I've ever used
o Some parts of handling. Good at sweeping bends.
o Out and out grip, especially in the wet
o The paint is very well put on!!
o The seats
o Snazzy trip computer although not as good as a VW.
Dislikes:
o Mid-range performance, I dislike seeing Cavalier 1.6Ls
disapearing into the middle distance accelerating from 70 in 5th!!
To counter this I might have to change my driving style!!
o Very heavy oil consumption. After 500 miles it had eaten 5 litres
but has stabilised since. Not that the oil light did not come
on at-all but the oil had fallen off the bottom of the dip stick.
The only warning of this is a very small sticker top right of the
windscreen. You have been warned!!
o Flat spot between 2000-3000 rpm. I will try and get this fixed
as it feels as though the mixture is a bit lean.This could explain
part of the mid-range performance problem.
o Poor fuel economy. 33.1mpg. This falls badly in town and above
70. Bloody Cats.
o Poor 'country road' handling. Seems to react badly to sudden changes
of direction, unlike the pug.
Qustions:
o When does the engine expire due to lack of oil!
o Does anyone else have problems with mid-range punch?
o What is the average fuel consumption?
G.P
|
1179.160 | | CURRNT::PACE::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Thu Jan 02 1992 09:12 | 17 |
| >> o When does the engine expire due to lack of oil!
Is there a prize for the person to guess this correctly ?
>> o Does anyone else have problems with mid-range punch?
Isn't this the problem with 16v engine designs ?
Or is this more noticeable than one would have expected ?
>> o What is the average fuel consumption?
I wouldn't complain if I had a fast vehicle that does over 30 mpg...
Overall though, it sounds like a pretty decent car.
J.R.
|
1179.161 | | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Thu Jan 02 1992 10:02 | 33 |
| .159� o Mid-range performance, I dislike seeing Cavalier 1.6Ls
.159� disapearing into the middle distance accelerating from 70 in 5th!!
.159� To counter this I might have to change my driving style!!
Yes if you're used to turbo-like engines ie plenty of torque in the
3000rpm area. A 4 valve per cylinder engine will only work well above
5000 rpm. Be prepared to use the gears a lot (including 1st)
.159� o Very heavy oil consumption. After 500 miles it had eaten 5 litres
Definitely something wrong here. When driven hard this engine should
not eat more than 1litre per 1000km (that's a lot)
.159� but has stabilised since. Not that the oil light did not come
.159� on at-all but the oil had fallen off the bottom of the dip stick.
The level gauge (ignition on, before starter motor) should indicate a
low level. The pressure gauge light did not come on which means there
was no pressure problem. Otherwise you would have had to stop the
engine within seconds to avoid damage.
.159� o Flat spot between 2000-3000 rpm. I will try and get this fixed
Known problem. The engine is really designed for high revs (above
5000rpm) and the inlet is definitely not optimised for good mixture at
low revs. I've heard Renault say that they will improve ...
.159� o Poor 'country road' handling. Seems to react badly to sudden changes
.159� of direction, unlike the pug.
The 205 GTI suspension is tuned for oversteer while the R19-16 is more
conventional. After a few hundred miles you'll get used to it. But I
agree the 205 feels extremely well for Monte Carlo type roads.
|
1179.162 | Previous story already told ... | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Thu Jan 02 1992 16:54 | 16 |
|
As reported earlier in this string, my son's R19 16V blew asunder after
3k miles. According to Renault, it was only halfway to it's first
recommended service.
Second engine has now covered 2k miles with no ill-effects so far.
This lump is renowned for not really flying until it has 6K miles on
the clock. Renault even instructed their agents to make sure demo cars
had this mileage as soon as possible, to show the car in it's true
light.
Definitely requires more gearbox activity than my 2 litre Mazda 16V,
but road-holding in the seriously twisty bits is a delight.
Colin
|
1179.163 | | NEWOA::ALFORD_J | The intermission fish... | Mon Jan 06 1992 09:12 | 9 |
| Re: .159
> o Very heavy oil consumption. After 500 miles it had eaten 5 litres
I shouldn't worry too much about this - as long as this was it's *first* 500
miles - do worry if this continues though.
My car gobbled oil in it's first 500, almost none since.
|
1179.164 | After a bit more milage... | MINDER::POWELL | | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:49 | 12 |
|
Thanks for the replys,
Since my last report the only real problem has been a squeeky
dashboard around the glovebox, I've tried to fix it but it seems too well
stuck together.
Oil consumption has all but stopped thank god, my wallet was
taking a real beating. Engine seems a bit more lively although maybe I'm
just getting used to it.
G.P
|
1179.165 | Only need one maintenance manual .... | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:54 | 9 |
|
My family are slow learners. Although baby son blew up his 19 16v after
3k miles, older son now has one as well -- & the old man is probably
getting a 16V cabrio as soon as they are available ....
Perhaps we'll star in Renault News or somesuch!!
Colin
|
1179.166 | June for the cabrio | LARVAE::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Thu Jan 09 1992 10:03 | 11 |
| The guy at DTM in Reading reckons the earliest that the Cabrio will be
out is June and that they should know the price in May.
As for my own fuel consumption after 7000 miles it seems to be around
28/29 in town, 32/34 fast motorway to Scotland and back, and about
37/40 leisurely cruising. Not too bad really, better than my 5 Turbo
at least.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.167 | | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Fri Jan 10 1992 13:48 | 6 |
|
My contacts in Renault PR tell me there are already 25 cabrios
registered in the UK -- presumably being road-tested on the
continent by the press, or somesuch.
Colin
|
1179.168 | PURCHASE POINTS ON THE REN'19.. | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Fri Jan 10 1992 15:43 | 17 |
|
Hi
I was reading through my"New car price giude"and i came
across the Renault 19 page.I'm concidering changing my car and the
price of an A1 condition Ren'19 seemed quite resonable.I was thinking
of spending around 5000-5500 pounds,what do you get,in the way of
extras in the GTS and the TSE models??(i'm thinking of the 1.4 models
)What are they like to drive?How do they handle?Are they comfortable
inside?.Also is there anything that you can advice me to look for when
purchasing second-hand Renaults.
Are they really worth it when comparing it to an Astra??
Thanks in advance!
Andy.....MUFC.
|
1179.169 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | My God, It's full of stars! | Fri Jan 10 1992 18:53 | 8 |
| I drove a 1.4 energy, fully loaded with Workstations to Plymouth.
I found it to be a reasonable performer, with excellent economy, and
an excellent ride. Handling seemed good too. The Cabin felt spacious,
but the interior was a little plasticky. I think this improves in the
higher up models.
Mark.
|
1179.170 | ONE FOR THE ROAD??? | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Mon Jan 13 1992 08:06 | 12 |
|
Thanks Mark.
I went to look around one on Friday,and i was quite
impressed,the salesman offered a 1 hour test drive so i might just
take him up on has offer.
Anyone else?????
Cheers
ANDY.....MUFC
|
1179.171 | R19 Cabrio test report | LARVAE::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Thu Jan 30 1992 10:45 | 10 |
| There's a full road test report on the R19 16v Cabriolet in this weeks
Autocar and Motor. Makes quite interesting reading overall. Seems that
they got better performance out of it than the hatch version which
seemed strange to me, they must have had a dodgy hatchback. The two
main criticisms were the rattles from the facia, it wouldn't be a
Renault without those, and the fuel consumption.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.172 | Another one bites the dust! | LARVAE::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Wed Mar 04 1992 14:00 | 18 |
| The 5 Turbo trouble of eating clutch cables seems to have spread to the
19 too, but at even lower milage - mines only done 9� K. It broke in the
middle of the Brompton Rd right outside Harrods last night, and I ended up
spending 5 hours waiting for the RAC to fail miserably at fitting a
temporary one and then arranging for a tow truck.
It was quite an interesting sight seeing the car jacked up about 2 ft
in the air so that the guy could get the tow truck scoop under the
front wheels without breaking off the front spoiler. It was more difficult
getting my car on this tow-truck than it was getting the Diablo onto the
SeaCat in last weeks Autocar and Motor!
Oh well lets hope it was a one off - but somehow I get this strange
feeling that it may become a regular occurrance.
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.173 | Renault Build a Better Car? | SUBURB::SCREENER | Robert Screene, UK Finance EUC | Wed Mar 04 1992 18:47 | 1 |
|
|
1179.174 | Don't give me that!! | YUPPY::SACKMANJ | I was dreaming of the past... | Thu Mar 05 1992 13:14 | 7 |
| Spike,
You'll just have to stop those racing gearchanges!
8-)
Jon.
|
1179.175 | Uprated 19 16V ? | KERNEL::BROWNE | Chris Browne Operational Management Team | Thu Apr 23 1992 13:10 | 5 |
| I heard something about the 19 16v having a facelift, different dash
and front end and also 1.8 litres up from 1.7. Is this true ?
Chris
|
1179.176 | New 19 front | CURRNT::PAYNE_A | Discount Pants'n'Haircuts | Thu Apr 23 1992 13:35 | 6 |
| there's a picture of the new front-end of the 19 in this weeks Autocar
& Motor (news pages). The headlights are now 'almond shaped' - their
words not mine. I always thought the engine was 1.8 (or 179x cc-ish)
anyway.
andy
|
1179.178 | | LEECHS::hilton | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Thu Apr 23 1992 14:37 | 5 |
| Is there a price increase for this new 19? what else do you get apart
from new headlights!!
Greg
|
1179.179 | More power I think ? | KERNEL::BROWNE | Chris Browne Operational Management Team | Thu Apr 23 1992 15:19 | 9 |
|
I also heard that the power was up from 137 bhp to 140 giving
more torque for mid range accelaration, after driving one
yesterday I must agree it is totally flat below 4000 rpm.
I still fancy one though :-)
C
|
1179.180 | Not here for some time yet? | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Mon Apr 27 1992 11:11 | 6 |
|
New 19 is available in France from mid-June. Road tests in all the
French press during the last couple of weeks. Long list of improvements
-- but I didn't have good enough French to understand them in a quick
squint in the tabac .....
|
1179.181 | No info in the UK | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Thu Apr 30 1992 16:02 | 5 |
| Just rang my local UK dealer, who can't give me any info. He confirmed
it was being given a face lift, but said that Renault UK have not heard
anything official, only rumours. He said probably later this year.
Greg
|
1179.182 | | NEWOA::MORAN | Wey not likely!! | Wed May 06 1992 22:13 | 7 |
|
re: a couple back.
Its actually a 1764cc I believe. Some people class this as a 1.7 others
as a 1.8. I don't really care, as I class mine as plain fast!!
Tim
|
1179.183 | Rear Wipe on Saloon | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jun 05 1992 10:28 | 6 |
| Any 19 saloon owners out there think that the rear wiper option is
worth having?
Cheers,
Greg
|
1179.184 | (imho) wouldn't bother | NEWOA::MORAN | Wey not likely!! | Fri Jun 05 1992 12:33 | 9 |
|
Greg,
In its current state, its not even worth having on the hatchback. You
can't leave it on. To do so, would mean that you'd have to leave your
right hand on the stalk indefinately. Its pretty much usless in
torrential rain.
Tim
|
1179.185 | Slow, Slow and Slower | MINDER::POWELL | | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:44 | 17 |
|
Re a few back.
I've got a 10k ish 19 16v and I agree that the engine is totally
flat below 4000 rpm. A real dissapointment. Its so slow that most of
the time it doesnt feel like a Gti at all, more like a Siera on
tranquilizers. This is a shame because the rest of the car is really
very good indeed, far better than the RS2000 in all respects apart from
the engine.
One other minus point is the lack of side protection against those
inconsiderate bast***S who open their door into the side of your car.
I've been looking around for some after market protection to fit where
the grey stripe is at the moment to help guard against this.
G.P
|
1179.186 | New renault 19 | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Fri Jun 12 1992 10:09 | 8 |
|
On the number 10 bus this morning from Kings Cross seen a large poster
of the new 19 16 valve with its reshaped front end and new alloy
wheels, looked very nice. I'm just a bit surprised that I have'nt seen
it in any of the motor mags.
Regards martin
|
1179.187 | hmm... | SUBURB::ALLYS | Reality... No Digital !! | Fri Jun 12 1992 14:29 | 10 |
| I spoke to the Renault dealer in Reading and he said that they will be getting
brochures next week.
He seemed to think that the engine was staying the same though, I thought I
heard they were increasing the BHP.
Anybody got any more comments on living with the Saloon 16v.
Shaz
|
1179.188 | Some Views on the Reanult 19 16V Saloon | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Fri Jun 12 1992 15:08 | 49 |
| re:a couple
Greg and his rear wiper :-
I believe the wiper could be of significant value. On the saloon, you
don't really get a lot of water on the rear screen once travelling
(although it does appear on the door mirrors ;-) However, it would be
very useful to clear the rear screen before you drive away from a stop,
e.g. in the morning.
Performance :-
It is slower below the 4,000 rev mark. I always understood that the
gear lever could fix this problem by moving it to the left. I don't
indluge in too much racing, but I can generally keep up with most cars
on the road if being driven reasonably sensibly. There will always be
faster 1.8L Sierras doing 105mph in the outside lane ;-)
General :-
It's a great, fun car to drive. Mine has the removable radio, and this
feature seems to have screwed one of the speaker connections. Not fixed
after a few atTemepts. However, the new standards stereo should not
have this problem.
There's rust in the front o/s indicator holder. Dodgy seal seems to
have let water in, causing occasional failure of the system. Will get
sorted at next service.
Dash has a tendency to rattle more than I'd like. But, it is a Renault,
with stiff suspension. And the (working) stereo ususally fixes the
problem.
The seats are brilliant. The cloth is naff, especially in hot weather.
But the driving position - yuk. Maybe it's just me getting old (no
comments Greg), but I find I get a stiff back and pins-n-needles more
than I should.
MPG average nearly 33. Much better recently 'cause I've been doing more
long distance motorway miles. My lady was driving it the other day,
75-80 on the motorway, returned 38-40 mpg, no problem.
I couldn't do without the extra doors. Plus the spolier is lower on the
saloon, meaning I can actually see cars out of the rear screen !
Overall a brilliant car to drive. I'm glad I got it. Not sure if I'd
get another, I think my priorities may have changed by then !
Colin
|
1179.189 | | LEECHS::hilton | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:02 | 17 |
| re .188
Colin,
> But the driving position - yuk.
Funny, perhaps your knobs aren't adjusted correctly, the driving
position has been well rated by all reviews.
> MPG average nearly 33
What did the computer say the MPG was after my test drive ;^)
Greg
|
1179.190 | My knobs are fine !! | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Fri Jun 12 1992 16:25 | 8 |
| re:last
-33mpg ;-)
Actually, it was about 36-37, but Cheryl had been driving it the
weekend before !
Colin
|
1179.191 | Some stuff from Renault | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jun 12 1992 18:43 | 10 |
| The Renault contact magazine says the new 19 is on sale from 12th June.
Features a new, more rounded frontal design and stylish new tail light
cluster, improved seat upholstery, revised switchgear and a host of
equipment additions.
New 1.8 95bhp engine, and 113 bhp 1.8 to a new RTi version. 137bhp 16
valve engine remains the same.
Greg
|
1179.192 | ? | NEUPST::KENNEDY_C | | Fri Jun 12 1992 19:36 | 2 |
|
I saw a convertible R19 yesterday, is that a standard model?
|
1179.193 | Vroom! | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Mon Jun 15 1992 09:05 | 11 |
|
I saw the new Renault 19 on a T.V. ad,last night.It's a Beauty.
(Can I use the word "Beauty" Teacher Winpenny?)
The front of the car reminds me of the new VW Golf.And the rear light
cluster is like something off an American car.The sides of the car look
pretty much the same,but you don't see much of the interior(But there's
some totty in the front)
I've said my piece.
Andy......
|
1179.194 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Vote for Perot : He's got $3B! | Mon Jun 15 1992 09:40 | 6 |
|
The 19 cabriolet is, indeed, a standard production model.
Comes in a low powered version (1.4?) and the 16v version.
Mark
|
1179.195 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Lively up yourself | Mon Jun 15 1992 09:41 | 6 |
| Has the Cabrio been facelifted too?
The new shaped headlamps make the car quite nice looking. I always
thought it a really ugly car before.
Ian
|
1179.196 | | LEECHS::hilton | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Jun 15 1992 09:44 | 5 |
| > Has the Cabrio been facelifted too?
Yep, right across the range. Looks very nice in the Renault magazine.
Greg
|
1179.197 | I got sent info.... | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Mon Jun 15 1992 13:38 | 9 |
| When I got home friday there was a brochure on the mat with an
invitation to a win one on the promotional weekend. I also found a copy
of Auto-Express for december with pictures of it.
As well as front and rear the dash has been reworked too, it's got a
curved top, and as a result the centre vents and radio have been
swopped round (vents now above radio).
Richard
|
1179.198 | New cabrio | LARVAE::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Mon Jun 15 1992 14:09 | 16 |
| The Renault dealer in Basingstoke (near the ice rink) has a new style
16V cabriolet sitting outside - looks very nice indeed with new front
and rear styling.
I didn't notice much change to the dash - only it doesn't have the
computer fuel consumption gadget, dials are now black and white, and
the indicator/wiper stalks are now more solidly built and rounded off
rather than square. Apart from that all other things look identical to
the 16V hatch.
Maybe the new style hatch has a different dash to the cabrio?
Cheers,
Spike.
|
1179.199 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | Lively up yourself | Mon Jun 15 1992 15:20 | 3 |
| Is there any difference in price?
Ian
|
1179.200 | New switchgear? | CHEFS::UKCS03::MARTIN | Chris Martin @REO DTN: 830-2288 | Mon Jun 15 1992 19:28 | 5 |
|
It looked from the TV ad. that the window switches were on the door. Definitely
better than poking around on the dash!
Chris
|
1179.202 | Gimme, gimme one NOW | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Jun 16 1992 14:18 | 8 |
| re .210
If that's true, it's an even better car than the good car all the mags
have raved about. The only thing I disliked about the 'old' 19 was the
horrible red and black seats, the electric window switches being
repositioned is a great idea!
Greg
|
1179.203 | What the ad says | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Tue Jun 16 1992 15:41 | 31 |
| The following extract is taken from the Renault advert in Auto Express:
"Beware, the new Renault 19 is impossible to resist. See it, you're
tempted. Sit in it, you're impressed. Drive it and the seduction is
complete.
From the sparkling diamond on the sleek new front end to the
distinctively restyled rear, this new Renault 19 is positively loaded
with tempting features.
Some, like those beautiful new alloy wheels, you can clearly see.
Others like tintes glass you can see through.
But many more are waiting to be discovered. Such as a catalytic
converter, rear head restraints, remote control central locking plus a
height adjustable steering whell and drivers seat. And speaking of
drivers, we dont want ours to become heated we've provided heated door
mirrors ahich are electronically adjustable from inside and the digital
stereo radio cassette which can be operated without taking your hands
off the wheel or you eyes off the road.
Also to keep you cool is our tilt/slide electric glass sunroof.
theres a redesigned instrument panel and improved upholstery. Plus each
model in the range benefits from the convenience of a 60/40 slpit rear
seat.
Keeping all this safe and secure for only you to enjoy is Renault's
anti theft protection system, plus on the 16 valve, a full function
alarm"
Price for 16 valve is 13,175 for the hatch and add 170 for saloon.
Regards martin
|
1179.204 | Saloon=more $$$ | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Jun 16 1992 15:57 | 5 |
| WOW!
So they have started charging more for the saloon, I wonder why?
Greg
|
1179.205 | Requote time, it only took 4 weeks last time. | KERNEL::BROWNE | Chris Browne Operational Management Team | Tue Jun 16 1992 19:21 | 11 |
|
Re: .203
I have just received a quote back from fleet for a 16V 4 door
with alarm, I had better get a requote as according to .203
it now has one as standard. Good job I read that, otherwise I
would have been paying for nothing.
C
|
1179.206 | Price info + details on new 19 16v | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jun 19 1992 10:36 | 15 |
| I've now got a NEW RENAULT 19 brochure.
The new price for 16v saloon and hatch is 13,175. It has an alarm as
standard.
They have also scrapped the garish red and black seats for a more
subtle version. The electric windows switch is on the car door, the
drive gets 4 switches, up/down for his side + passenger, 1 switch for
one-shot down, 1 switch for 1 shot up. Also electric mirror switch is
on the door.
The orange dials have been replaced by white.
The body shell has been made more rigid, and build quality has been
improved. This is meant to give a more solid and rattlefree ride.
|
1179.207 | Don't believe it | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Fri Jun 19 1992 13:02 | 10 |
| >> The body shell has been made more rigid, and build quality has
>> been improved. This is meant to give a more solid and rattlefree
>> ride.
Must admit I take this with a pinch of salt!. I doubt they've made any
changes that involve serious re-tooling. Looking at the pictures, the
full extent I can see is a revised bonnet front end. The wing cut outs
front and rear haven't changed, neither have the boot apertures or lids.
Richard
|
1179.208 | Believe it! | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Jun 19 1992 14:45 | 10 |
| re .207
The shell rigidity has been increased by the introduction of an extra
bracing strut, across the roof between the B-posts.
Now where can I watch you eat this salt ;^)
Greg
|
1179.209 | You do surprise me... | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Mon Jun 22 1992 13:49 | 5 |
| Is this visible, noticeable?.
If so I'm currently taking it (the pinch of salt) with my meal now. :-)
Richard
|
1179.210 | Pass | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Jun 22 1992 14:07 | 6 |
| Don't know if it's visible, its reported as being there in What Car,
I'll tell you if I order one :^)
Greg
Ps Too much salt is bad for you ;^)
|
1179.211 | Dash... suplemental | TIMMII::TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Fri Jun 26 1992 15:07 | 11 |
| re my .197 and the reply .198 about the dash.
I got an autoexpress this week with photo's of the new car, your right the
dash wasn't changed. Double checked the december issue photo's and it
definitely shows a different dash. This one did look nicer, slight 'eyebrow'
line to it, and radio and vents interchanged. Also clock moved to centre of
auxiliary switch line (it currently is on end of line)
Assumption is this was tried then rejected (tooling cost?).
Richard
|
1179.212 | Clutch Problems | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Tue Jul 28 1992 14:37 | 21 |
| WARNING WARNING WARNING ;-)
Picture the scene, morning of driving up to the sales conference in
Glasgow, gears baulky, particularly 1st, 2nd and 5th. So, I just took
it into the garage for a check up.
Last time I had a problem with the gears (17,000m) it was a broken
spring fouling the gearstick, so I thought that it'd be a quick and
simple job. After a test drive they said "sorry sir, we'll have to
strip down the clutch and gearbox" !!!
I got it back yesterday, net result 1 new clutch, at 25,000m !!!
Apparently the gearbox shows no sign of wear, but the clutch was
starting to 'seize'. All done under warranty (albeit my travel
arrangements were knackered).
So watch them clutches, boys.
Colin
P.S. Greg, just *how* were you driving my car ;-?
|
1179.213 | OOpps | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Jul 28 1992 15:39 | 4 |
| Sorry colin, I thought it was an automatic :^)
Greg
|
1179.214 | RENAULT 19 AND HOT WEATHER | SEDSWS::REEVES | ENOUGH SAID & SAID ENOUGH | Thu Aug 06 1992 16:44 | 9 |
| I HAVE THE OLD SHAPE RENAULT 19 16V SALOON. IMPRESSED BY ITS HANDLING,
ACCELERATION SEEMS A BIT SLOW COMPARED TO MY OLD RS TURBO, BUT IT DOES THE
JOB.
HOWEVER I HAVE JUST CLOCKED UP 9,000 MILES AND ALREADY THE CAR HAS BEEN IN
THE GARAGE 3 TIMES FOR THE SAME REASON.
IN HOT WEATHER, THE CAR DOES NOT LIKE STOP/START TRAFFIC. IT HAS AN
ERRATIC IDLE, AND ON PULL AWAY TENDS TO STALL UNLESS 3-4000 REVS ARE
MAINTAINED. HAS ANYONE HAD A SIMILAR PROBLEM, IF SO HOW WAS IT FIXED.
|
1179.215 | | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Thu Aug 06 1992 17:24 | 5 |
| .214�IN HOT WEATHER, THE CAR DOES NOT LIKE STOP/START TRAFFIC. IT HAS AN
.214�ERRATIC IDLE, AND ON PULL AWAY TENDS TO STALL UNLESS 3-4000 REVS ARE
.214�MAINTAINED. HAS ANYONE HAD A SIMILAR PROBLEM, IF SO HOW WAS IT FIXED.
Sounds like a weak fuel pump. Have you checked fuel pressure ?
|
1179.216 | | BELFST::FLANAGAN | Sir your shrubbery attacked me | Fri Aug 07 1992 10:31 | 7 |
| Interestingly tou mention the RS Turbo - well I had the same problem
with mine. It would cut out and not deliver full power (no not whilst
cut out :-). In hot weather it seemed to manifest itself most. In fact
you could hear the fuel pump straining and making a really loud
strimmer type noise. A new fuel pump cured the problem.
Gary.
|
1179.217 | RT diesel turbo anyone? | CMBOOT::DELANYS | | Mon Aug 24 1992 12:50 | 11 |
| Has anyone got/driven the 19 RT diesel turbo yet? It sounds pretty
enticing, as it seems to have quick performance, yet very good economy.
However, I've heard the downside is noise/ lack of refinement. Can
anyone verify this with experience?
Do Renault do a factory-fitted air-con option for the 19?
Stephen
|
1179.218 | Long wait for R19 16v | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Sep 01 1992 13:28 | 12 |
| What kind of delivery have people expirenced with Renault 19 16v's. I
placed my order with fleet on 27th July, when the quotes etc had come
back the order was placed on the 13th August, and now PHH are telling
me the expected delivery date is 29th October!
I thought that there was a recession on and dealers were desperate to
sell cars!
:^(
Greg
|
1179.219 | Shrinking exhausts | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Oct 05 1992 14:25 | 11 |
| Anyone else got a fairly new Renault 19 16V?
I got mine on Friday, and have noticed a shrinking exhaust problem!
The first models had a shiny huge tailpipe, then it shrunk to a smaller
shiny circle, now mine isn't shiny and looks just like a normal
tailpipe.
Wonder why they have done this?
Greg
|
1179.220 | possible explanation ? | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Mon Oct 05 1992 14:32 | 5 |
| .219� Wonder why they have done this?
The 1st models did not have the catalytic converter exhaust. Yours
obviously has it. That and the general cost reduction trend might
explain.
|
1179.221 | Try polishing it | SEDSWS::OXFORD | who's pulling my Pilsner | Tue Oct 06 1992 11:27 | 8 |
| Greg,
you havent got a shrinking exhaust, only a shrinking chrome
"dress up" bit. If you look up your pipe ! the internal diameter
is the same, the chrome bit just sits around the tail pipe
and is purely cosmetic, unlike the exhaust on a Lotus Carlton.
Nick.
|
1179.222 | | YUPPY::FOX | wen balus go bugarup yu mas rausin fols tits | Tue Oct 06 1992 14:59 | 3 |
| Re 218/9
So the delivery date quoted turned out to be almost accurate!
|
1179.223 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Oct 06 1992 15:37 | 5 |
| re .222
WOW!
You get Observant Person of the day award
|
1179.224 | Luckily i wasn't driving! ;-) | RUTILE::BISHOP | What the HELL are you talking about man! | Tue Oct 06 1992 17:37 | 8 |
| Nah Greg, i wouldn't worry about the shiny bit up yer bottom... ;-)
You want a car with mud baked on in clumps... ;-) None of this shiny mamby
pamby business! ;-)
PS. I tell you my Jeep was written off because it went through a house? Talk
about 3D TV! ;-) "Oh look dear, that Jeep looks like it's our own front
room!" ;-)
|
1179.225 | Add another one to the list | DIBDIB::DBATES | Time for a note | Wed Dec 02 1992 14:13 | 3 |
| Clutch cable has just broken at 21000 miles on 19 16v
:(
|
1179.226 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler.... | Wed Dec 02 1992 14:56 | 7 |
|
Hmmm.... Mine went at 29K (5 miles from a phone box). Was your clutch
pedal very difficult to depress before the cable broke, or was it
easily offended? Since the cable was replaced, I've had no further
problems with the clutch.
Tim
|
1179.227 | New shape problems? | FAILTE::HUTCHESONT | | Sat Dec 12 1992 13:28 | 12 |
|
I like the look of the new Renault 19 and it seems to be a bargain on
the scheme...anybody found anything particularly annoying or
problematic with the new shaped version? (except for the exhaust and
clutch cable...)
Ta, Tim.
PS - Is it still only black, blue, red, white, grey? What about those
nice convertible colours?
|
1179.228 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Dec 14 1992 09:56 | 6 |
| No Tim,
You can't have one 'cos I've got one, and yes the colours are only red,
white, black, blue or grey, but the 'new' red looks ok.
Greg
|
1179.229 | Double trouble ? | SEDSWS::OXFORD | eezer good ! | Mon Dec 14 1992 11:10 | 27 |
| Well i've a 19 16v, its done about 4000 miles and it went into
the dealers to have some things sorted out.
1) the centering spring in the gear lever had gone, ie. wobbly
gear stick.
2) the exhaust has been getting noisey, it sounds as though a baffle
is lose in one of the boxes, but as usual they couldnt find anything
wrong and said if it gets worse then bring it back.
3) the handbrake is pathetic, it wont hold the car on a hill unless
Arnold Schwarzenegger pulls it on and it only seems to lock one wheel
which means handbrake turns are impossible.
Well the exhaust has got a bit quieter so i'll see how it goes, the
gear lever was sorted out, they said there was also a fault on the
E.M.S. which they cleared, (this was probably caused by the h.t.lead to
the distributor falling off about 2 days after having the car, and it
stopping dead on a roundabout, very embarrasing), and the handbrake is
still pathetic and i'm taking it back again to have it looked at.
Other than that the only thing i've done is to change the radio, the
only good thing to say about that is that its got remote control, the
quality of the radio and the sound of the tape is s*@t (just my opinion)
so i've now got a decent system in the car, a great improvement over
the standard one.
Anybody else had any trub with their 16v ?
Nick.
|
1179.230 | Clutch cable snapping is very common | DIBDIB::DBATES | Time for a note | Wed Dec 23 1992 11:11 | 10 |
| Well according to Theale Motor Works, the clutch snapping problem is an
identified problem. Renault will replace the cable with a more robust
item under warranty on a car up to three years old.
Why dont they just recall them or replace them at the next service?
Seems they could have some very unhappy customers. Specially if you break
down miles from the nearest phone in the dark, in the cold, in the wet
etc. etc. etc.
David
|
1179.231 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Jan 04 1993 09:45 | 7 |
| Anyone else had a squeaky suspension on their 19 16V? Just driven up to
Scotland and back over New Year, with a fully loaded car, and the rear
suspension started squeaking. Doesn't seem to do it with just me
driving!!
Greg
|
1179.232 | out with the WD40 | SEDSWS::OXFORD | eezer good ! | Mon Jan 04 1993 10:32 | 9 |
| r re-1
Greg i've got a squeak coming from the rear of my car at the moment,
i couldn't tell wether it was the suspensn or the the exhaust moving
about on a squeaky brack, very annoying though.
Nick.
|
1179.233 | R19 Woes | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Mon Jan 04 1993 11:48 | 44 |
| Hello boys,
Known problems at the moment
1)Squeaky Rear Suspension
Had this for a while, sounds like suspension on NSR. It's 1,200 overdue
on the 36,000 service, I'll mentin it when I book it in.
2)Notchy Gearchange
Had this problem before, RAC diagnosed faulty (i.e. broken spring) on
gearchange at 17,000m. Replaced at next service. 25,000m gearchange
very sticky, Renault Warrington took the car in for a few days,
dismantled it, pronounced the gearbox sound and replaced the clutch.
Similar problems again at 30,000m service. This time they returned the
car without looking at the problem, saying the clutch needed replacing,
it was a nine hour job, they'd order the bits and phone me. 7,200 miles
later, no phone call.
The notchy problems went away because I belive the spring on the
gearchange broke and dropped off, so I left it ! Now the problem is
back, could be either the cold weather or another spring going !
3)Cable to Brake Fluid Check
Cable is becoming detached from the brake fluid check tank thingy. Will
mention at next service.
4)Renault Dealer Servicing
As bad as Vauxhall, see (2) above. The service manager is going to get
the sharp end of my tongue when I go to the garage.
As I said to my Dad over Christmas, it is a great car to drive, but I
don't think I would buy it at the end of the lease, too expensive to
maintain, too many things to go wrong.
Colin
P.S. I've just put the second set of new tyres on the front at 36,000,
they were down to 1mm. I also had to put new tyres on the back. I've
never had to do that on a FWD car before. The spare is now an old tyre
at 2mm, as PHH would only pay for three tyres.
|
1179.234 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon Jan 04 1993 13:27 | 11 |
| Colin,
What do you mean by notchy gearbox?
In the recent cold weather I kept missing 3rd gear, is this a similiar
symptom?
Cheers,
Greg
|
1179.235 | Grunch, grind, splatter | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Mon Jan 04 1993 16:24 | 10 |
| Greg,
That's just lack of co-ordination on your part !
No, missus, don't titter. Seriously, it's 1st, 2nd and 3rd (I don't use
the other gears). It is very hard to get the car into gear, sometimes
grinding even with the clutch virtually on the floor. Slowing to a stop
or brute force and ignorance ususally solved the problem.
Colin
|
1179.236 | Clutch adjustment? | LEDS::ROBERTSON | | Tue Jan 05 1993 17:23 | 7 |
| Actually sounds like the clutch isn't fully disengaged. I had the
same problem on a Renault Wagon here in the US. Proper clutch
adjustment fixed it.
--Dale
|
1179.237 | 1st service | SEDSWS::OXFORD | eezer good ! | Fri Jan 08 1993 16:06 | 22 |
| I put my 19 16v in for it's first service (6000 miles) yesterday
with 2 probs for them, the squeaky rear end and dodgy handbrake.
The squeak was cured by greasing the suspension.
The handbrake was iffy due to the bad fitment of the pads at the
factory, i thought that if it affected the handbrake it would also
affect the brakes in normal operation ?.
Anyway the lever felt tighter and had less travel so i thought i
would try it out. In my experience pulling up the handbrake locks
the rear wheels, i tried it on a wet road, down hill at about 15 mph
and the wheels didnt even lock, it only just about slowed the car.
Is this a Renault thing or do i have a poor handbrake ?.
I know its not due to the fact that it has rear discs because my friend
has an Uno Turbo which has rear discs and his handbrake is excellent.
I dont have a lot of experience with rear disc handbrakes, how do they
work, are they hydraulic or cable operated, and how are they adjusted
if at all, i've got no faith in garages anyway and if it's a d.i.y.
job i'll have a go at it myself.
So has anybody played with disc handbrakes and has anybody else felt
that the handbrake on their 19 is good or bad. I'd like to know.
Cheers Nick.
|
1179.238 | | YUPPY::ELLAWAY | Martin Ellaway@hhl | Mon Jan 11 1993 14:10 | 10 |
|
Nick,
My 5 GTT has disks at the rear and the handbrake works well enough
but would never lock the wheels even in the wet when moving, But then
again a handbrake is designed to keep the car parked not lock up the
rear wheels in the wet.
regards Martin
|
1179.239 | | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Mon Jan 11 1993 15:08 | 10 |
| � So has anybody played with disc handbrakes and has anybody else felt
� that the handbrake on their 19 is good or bad. I'd like to know.
The mechanism used for handbrakes on discs varies a lot from one
manufacturer (or model) to another. It is often very poor.
If you want to be able to lock up the wheels easily with a handbrake,
then get a hydraulic conversion ! Not [strictly] legal for road use.
J.R.
|
1179.240 | Illegal handbrakes | FORTY2::MITCHELL | | Mon Jan 11 1993 15:12 | 5 |
|
rathole warning! :-) - We're going to have to use a hydraulic
handbrake for the 23 this year - since the disk calipers we are going
to be using have no facility for a handbrake. Do you know if MOT
testers are likely to actually look at the handbrake mechanism?
|
1179.241 | Wrong topic title, but does it matter ? | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Mon Jan 11 1993 17:57 | 21 |
| � to be using have no facility for a handbrake. Do you know if MOT
� testers are likely to actually look at the handbrake mechanism?
In my experience, they do check the cable run for correct routing
so that it goes through any required guides and is not frayed.
The cable may also be checked when under tension, but I don't
know if this is the case.
Solution I have known is for the cable ends to be attached, somehow,
to the calipers or the pads themselves, so that pulling the handbrake
does move the cable, although the hydraulics will do the work.
At least the handbrake will work very well on the rollers. That being
the case, one would hope that the testers do not get over-zealous on
how the handbrake actually works.
J.R.
PS I'm using Lancia Thema turbo calipers, the handbrake mechanism for
which is apparently quite effective. The discs are not vented
though. What brakes are you using ? (A.P. if you feeling rich ?)
|
1179.242 | more for the rathole! | FORTY2::MITCHELL | | Tue Jan 12 1993 08:31 | 3 |
|
We're using Formula Ford - (A.P) they may be expensive - but
they're cheaper than the Alpha Sud brake calipers!
|
1179.243 | | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Tue Jan 12 1993 08:41 | 4 |
| .238� My 5 GTT has disks at the rear and the handbrake works well enough
Does the handbrake really work on the discs ? I thought there was a
small drum brake in the center of the disc ... I may be wrong
|
1179.244 | | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Tue Jan 12 1993 09:09 | 14 |
| � small drum brake in the center of the disc ... I may be wrong
This is certainly done on some cars, but I know nowt about Renaults.
To continue further on the disc brake/handbrake discussion, does
anyone know of any cars that have a separate caliper for the handbrake ?
this would be fairly small and operated only by the cable linkage, no
hydraulics involved. I'm pretty sure they exist, but I don't know
which vehicle they come from. I don't need these, but I know of some
people who may do (as well as the '23' it seems) - all depending on the
mood and attitude of the MOT testers...
J.R.
|
1179.245 | yes I know one | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Tue Jan 12 1993 09:16 | 3 |
| .244� anyone know of any cars that have a separate caliper for the handbrake ?
Porsche.
|
1179.246 | Which Porsche ? | NEWOA::ORCHARD_T | If you don't change your direction ... | Tue Jan 12 1993 09:22 | 9 |
| .244� anyone know of any cars that have a separate caliper for the handbrake ?
.245> Porsche.
My 924 had drums inside the disks on the back
- my Golf Gti has disks all round and calipers for the handbrake (I
know this 'cos it cost me �70 to get the calipers unsiezed)
Tony O
|
1179.247 | more on h'brakes | SEDSWS::OXFORD | eezer good ! | Tue Jan 12 1993 11:00 | 5 |
|
I know that Jags have seperate calipers for the handbrake.
Nick.
|
1179.248 | | ULYSSE::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @VBE, DTN 828-5584 | Tue Jan 12 1993 11:40 | 4 |
| .246�.245> Porsche.
I've owned at least one 911 that had a small caliper for handbrake.
Can't remember how the 928's was.
|
1179.249 | citroen gs | WELCLU::YOUNG | | Thu Jan 14 1993 11:16 | 5 |
| The Citroen GS used a separate caliper on the front wheels with pads
about the size of an old 10p... I'm not sure about the BX but it may
well use a simmilar system
Richard
|
1179.250 | any 16v quotes please | WELCLU::YOUNG | | Thu Jan 14 1993 12:09 | 6 |
|
Does anyone have any current/recent quotes for a renault 19 16valve,
I've just submitted two,one with met. paint & locking wheelnuts the
other plus abs. I'll post them in the quotes note when I get them back.
Richard (Young)
|
1179.251 | | FORTY2::PALKA | | Thu Jan 14 1993 12:11 | 7 |
| The Citroen GS used inboard discs, close to the gearbox. The (non
transverse) engine was in front of drive shafts. (At least on
the model owned by a friend of mine).
The BX is a much more conventional car.
Andrew
|
1179.252 | Back to the main topic.... | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Thu Jan 14 1993 17:47 | 54 |
| My 19 16V has just been in for it's 36,000 mile service (at 37,500m). I
have had a number of problems, as detailed above. I am very unhappy
with the service and attitude...
The car went in on Monday. I phoned them at the end of the day (note, I
phoned them, not the other way around). They had decided that there was
definitely a gearbox problem this time, and it needed stripping down.
PHH approved this work, but not any parts until the problem was
diagnosed.
On Tuesday afternoon, I again phoned the garage, to be told the box had
been stripped, some parts were needed, and the cost was being sorted
between Renault and PHH. The parts were on order for delivery on
Wednesday. The car should be ready on Thursday, but they'd phone me.
Wednesday came, and went. On Thursday I phoned them. Hooray, the car
was ready. I told them I would like a copy of the worksheet, so that I
knew exactly what work had been done. 'What do you want that for ?' was
the response, 'I do not think we are allowed to do that.'
I picked the car up at 5.00. They tell me all the work has been done,
although a couple of items were not ticked off. No, they can't give me
a copy of the worksheet because of the Data Protection, and we're not
supposed to see what PHH are charged. I eventually persuaded them, just
before I blew my stack, that I couldn't car less about the prices, just
put the details on a separate piece of paper.
This they did, whilst I had a discussion with the 'After Sales Manager'
AKA Service Manager. They even tried to persuade me it was my fault the
work wasn't done at the 30,000m service because I didn't book it in,
when in fact they told me they were ordering bits and would phone me
(which they didn't).
They also told me that when the clutch was changed at 25,000m, it was
completely shot. This is a load of rubbish (I'm feeling polite).
I have phoned PHH, and one of their technical people is going to call
me back (we'll see).
According to the paperwork, they had to
'Remove gearbox, strip and replace first gear hub and selector shaft'.
I also had two new shock absorbers, new rear brake pads (not bad since
it has discs all round), and various other adjustments.
The final straw was when the service manager told me that Renault say
that this is a performance car, and if the clutch/gearbox wore out, it
must be driver fault. If that's the case, why are they paying ?
Colin
P.S. R19 16V - great car to drive when it is on the road. Service
skills crap. Customer service, crappier.
|
1179.253 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | The car behind is an ATOYOT | Fri Jan 15 1993 10:07 | 4 |
| Use a local decent garage. In Basingstoke, I now use
Ralphs. They are only 100 yards from the Crescent.
Mark.
|
1179.254 | Move garages | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | Party on Dudes | Fri Jan 15 1993 13:50 | 12 |
| That's utter Rubbish about not knowing what Phh are charged. My local
Renault guy shows me the yellow Renault receipt, and then the PHH credit
card receipt, he shows the 2 totals match, then I sign the PHH form.
Indeed the PHH instructions say you should check that these totals match!
Move garages fast, Colin!
Greg
|
1179.255 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Well Des, it was a bit of a bobbler.... | Mon Jan 18 1993 16:06 | 11 |
|
One of my suspension rod/strut thingy-mjingys gave way the other day,
whilst I was driving (very carefully, for me). It had completely come
away from it's mounting and the front passenger wheel was very "floppy"
indeed. Apparently, this has happened 3 times recently on Lease car
19 16vs. National Breakdown reckoned, I'll "never be as lucky again
with a wheel as it could have done a load of damage".
Personally, I don't feel very lucky at all.
Tim
|
1179.256 | R19 RT 1.8i | CYCLIC::TURNER | | Thu Jan 21 1993 11:05 | 34 |
| Well Ive just taken delivery of a Renault 19 1.8i RT.
I think it looks great, it has a similar sports body kit to the 16 valve and
is a dark metallic blue colour similar to sports blue the car has the five door
body style.
I cant tell you about how it goes yet as I only had a short test drive at the
dealers some time last November.
This model has a new engine from Renault: 1.8 multi point fuel injection.
The figures quoted by renault are power: 113 bhp and Torgue 160 NM (?) That
tourque figure is higher than they quote for the 16 valve, hopefully that
should endow the car with reasonable mid range acceleration.
I chose this car after my 5 GT Turbo was stolen last year. My first choice of
replacement car was the 19 16 Valve but that was too expensive, I wanted
something with four or five doors for easy access to the rear seats as my wife
and I are expecting an addition to the family in April. I also looked at the
Fiat Tipo 16 Valve ( no headroom ) and the Citroen ZX 2.0 volcane ( total brake
failure during test drive ! ).
The best thing about my new renault 19 is its driver price, 28 pounds !
The options I got where:
Renault Alarm, Metallic paint, Alloy wheels and Leather Seats ( slightly more
headroom ).
Ill file a report on how it drives when i've run it in.
Barrie.
|
1179.257 | Lucky at 46,000 miles | JOCKEY::GLEDHILLS | No Brakes, No Steering | Mon Jan 25 1993 12:55 | 18 |
| Re: .255
Same thing happened on my 16v on New Year's Day in Bristol - offside
strut came away from the mounting - luckily only doing about 10mph
leaving a car park (but 10 mins later would have been on the M4 heading
home).
Spent the next 4.5 hours being towed back to Newmarket in freezing fog.
According to my local Renault garage this seems a fairly common problem
with 21's and now 19's (they'd already replaced the nearside strut
again due to metal fatigue).
Cheers
Sue
|
1179.258 | RT 1.8i | WELCLU::YOUNG | | Tue Feb 02 1993 10:34 | 27 |
|
I can't find the note now but somebody was asking about the new renault
19 1.8i model and what it was called somewhere in here.
I think the model you are refering to is the RT1.8i....see .256
from .256 it sounds like a bargain...shame Ive already got both my
quotes in, or does anyone know if carfleet will really accept more
quotes than two...I can't believe they are organised enough to know
you've already submitted two.
Anyway back to the RT1.8i I have the brochure in front of me and it
reads something like this.:-
5 door hatch
1794cc
113bhp @5500rpm
160 Nm @4250
0-62 9.9 secs
120 max speed
45.6 mpg @56 mph
35.3 mpg @75 mph
26.4 mpg @urban
175/65 r14 tyres alloys optional
no trip computer
different seat fabric
otherwise its a 16v lookalike
includes leccy windows pas etc
Richard (young)
|
1179.259 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Hypodeemic nerdle | Tue Feb 02 1993 10:52 | 6 |
| �accept more quotes than two..
Once your original quotes are returned you should be able to submit
more with no problem.
Roy
|
1179.260 | | KERNEL::FISCHERI | I can always sleep standing up | Tue Feb 02 1993 12:14 | 4 |
| ....only the time it takes to get your second set back means that the first ones
will probably have expired and you may miss out on a bargain.
Ian
|
1179.261 | Servicing could be better | BLKPUD::HUGHESS | | Tue Feb 02 1993 16:52 | 28 |
| RE .252
Colin
Do you know this garage went bankrupt a couple of years back as Barras
Garage and now operate as Belcharm. Renault at one stage actually
stopped supplying parts because of bad debts. I only use the garage
because of convience as St Helens and manchester are the only other
options. I have had very bad service from them, they never phone you.
they never tell you anything but I've always had a yellow service form
so something dodgey was obviously going on when they wouldn't even give
you that.
history for my Renault 19 16v 18months old 29,000 miles
15,000 full exhaust replaced rattle warranty job
improved petrol consumption after 10,000 miles
20,000 clutch cable snapped ....replaced
noisy fuel pump. - I've been told this is an acceptable noise. i
disagree
As previous noters say it's a great car to drive but Renault's
servicing is the PITS! (..in warrington)
Simon
|
1179.262 | Its a fault | BLKPUD::FLYNNB | | Wed Mar 17 1993 17:41 | 24 |
| RE .255 and .257
My Saloon has now done 43K and it's happened twice.Both times the car
has been loaded up and on a long journey.
The mounting plate gives way and the strut falls away and is left
banging around in the cavity.
The off-side strut came apart from the top mounting plate at approx 35k
The near-side strut did the same thing last week. At the time I was tootling
down the M8 at 80mph (I mean 70 of course).
It was nothing dramatic just some loud bangs and knocks from that
corner of the car ,it still drove okay and it was easy enuff to pull over
to the hard shoulder and await the truck trip back to Manchester.
The interesting point is that the repairs were done at Renault
Manchester and they replaced BOTH mounting plates and scribbled the
date on them. So thay are obviously aware of the situation.
My advice is to keep a close eye on that plate - if you see any cracks
or suspicious marks on the plate get it checked asap.
Bernie
|
1179.263 | It's a "known problem"! | WAYOUT::WAYOUT::LOAT | Ahead groove factor 5! Yeah! | Thu Mar 18 1993 11:50 | 16 |
|
re .255 .257 .262
In the latest edition of What Car? in their consumer feature, they had a person
who has had exactly the same thing happen to them. What Car found that Renault
had issued a recall notice for Renault 19s to fix this very problem, but many
garages didnb't seem to know anything about it. They also concluded that this
is a very dangerous fault, and that Renault should do something about it *now*.
The recall notice was for 19s produced between certain dates, so check these out
if you can.
Steve.
PS. I'll see if I can remeber to bring the edition of What Car in and get more
info.
|
1179.264 | Hope mine's ok! | RODLEY::hilton | Party on Dudes | Thu Mar 18 1993 14:22 | 9 |
| >>PS. I'll see if I can remeber to bring the edition of What Car in and get
>>more info.
That would be really useful, if you could.
Cheers,
Greg
|
1179.265 | Have they sorted it now? | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Thu Mar 18 1993 17:37 | 6 |
|
Are they okay now as I am awaiting delivery of one now?
It would be nice to think that I wasn't getting a dodgy car.
Richard (young)
|
1179.266 | Straight from the horses mouth. | WAYOUT::WAYOUT::LOAT | Ahead groove factor 5! Yeah! | Fri Mar 19 1993 09:52 | 35 |
|
All this info is lifted from the 'Awards Issue' of What Car?. The feature in
question was in the Help section, where they try to help people out with any
problems they have with their cars.
The car in question was a 1991 19 16v, and the metal plate which secures the
suspension to the body had snapped completely.
"Renault found out in August last year that the plate in question was designed
with insufficent research on the stresses the 16v places on it over the other
models of Renault 19. All Renault 19 16v models prior to the facelift in June
1992 were instructed to be examined for cracks which could appear under
prolonged hard use."
Under the section "What to do if you're worried about your Renault 19 16v" it
says:
* Cars concerned were sold between March 1991 and July 1992
* First sign of the problem is a metallic groaning from the car's front end
* The dealer will replace the part free if not already replaced
Renault have said that they had issued a technical note back in August when the
problem was first found, but it seems that they only restricted this to their
francised dealers, not to the owners of the cars, as is normally done.
This means that anyone who gets their car serviced at a non-francised garage will
not have seen this note, and a lot of Renault garages don't seem to be aware of
this either.
Have fun 8-]
Steve.
|
1179.267 | Renault said ".... | KERNEL::EVERESTA | Yep....like the mountain!!! | Fri Mar 19 1993 10:20 | 9 |
|
I rang Baldocks Renault in Bracknell and was told by their service
staff that my K 'reg' 16v will be fitted with the new uprated bracket.
If you are unsure apparanatly you can look under the bonnet, the plate
is silver and will be painted with a dot or similar if modified. I
haven't yet looked at my car so do not know how easily the plate can be
seen.
Ade.
|
1179.268 | Theres nowt so starnge as folk | LARVAE::LINCOLN_J | | Fri Mar 19 1993 12:28 | 7 |
| So far this column has recorded the following for the
R19 16v. Self destructing engines, snapping clutch cables
and disintegrating suspensions.
And people still buy them!.
-John
|
1179.269 | | JOCKEY::GLEDHILLS | No Brakes, No Steering | Fri Mar 19 1993 14:07 | 13 |
| Re: .268
Yes, but they are great fun to drive.
Even with all the problems described (and my 19 16v has had more than
it's fair share !!) I'm seriously considering another one in August.
I'd recommend the 19 to anyone but make sure your local Renault garage
has a very competent mechanic!
Cheers
Sue
|
1179.270 | Self-destructing engines? | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Fri Mar 19 1993 14:38 | 9 |
|
I've missed the bit on self-destructing engines where's that?
I know of someone who wrecked an engine driving through a flood as it
appears to have the air intake fairly low down and he sucked in water,
but I've not heard of any other engine prob's except high oil
consumption.
Richard (young)
|
1179.271 | | CYCLIC::TURNER | | Fri Mar 19 1993 15:02 | 18 |
| RE -1,
>> but I've not heard of any other engine prob's except high oil
>> consumption.
Way back at the beggining of this notes string there are a couple of entries
about engines that siezed up because their drivers didn't notice the high oil
consumption. I beleive Renault now warns all new owners about this problem when
they collect their new cars ( aparrently the Clio 16V engine has the same
problem ). The high oil consumption is only supposed to last for the running in
period.
Re the suspension problem,
Does this only affect the 16V ?
Barrie.
|
1179.272 | yes | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Fri Mar 19 1993 15:16 | 2 |
|
I think so!
|
1179.273 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Mar 19 1993 15:52 | 4 |
| Since the facelift I don't see any problems in here.
Greg (fingers crossed) :^)
|
1179.274 | | PLUNDR::MORAN | Nice bloke, nice and fat! | Fri Mar 19 1993 16:54 | 10 |
|
Well, my suspension has gone once already (couple of months ago ) and I've
noticed that the "metallic groaning from the car's front end" has again
manifested itself <gulp>, MPG is down to 22 round town too.
Sounds like I ought to have it looked at asap.
Tim
PS I'd still have another one, too.
|
1179.275 | 3 wheels on my wagon | SEDSWS::OXFORD | eezer good ! | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:05 | 28 |
|
After 14000 miles in my 16v the problem list is still growing (but not
to fast). The clutch pedal has on occasion made a loud bang as if the
cable has snapped and hit the floor, i pulled the pedal up by hand and
it "clicked" back in and carried on functioning normally (weird).
The drivers door was making some horrible noises when opening it, at
the last service they told me it had a broken "check bar". This had to
be ordered and was replaced. While it was in i asked them to look at
the handbrake as it was not working very well. (yes i'm still moaning
about my handbrake), i have mentioned it at both previous services, they
told me they had adjusted it, and it was ok now, well i didnt think so,
so i tried again.
This time when i picked the car up they told me that the car was put on
the m.o.t. brake tester, and found that the nearside calliper was not
working at all. See, i knew it wasn't quite right. A new calliper was
on order and they would call me when it was in.
This raises the question of what did they look at the other 2 times i
told them i wasn't happy with h'brake.... s.f.a. Obviously they thought
i was imagining it and fobbed me off with one of their pre prepared
statements.
It also doesn't say much for Renaults pre delivery tests, sending a car
out with only one rear brake, what else am i going to find.
Mind you, even with all these problems and niggles it's still a great
car to drive.
Nick.
|
1179.276 | We can't see it, you're lying! | KERNEL::BAYLISD | Filth Daemon from Hell | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:28 | 12 |
| re. -1.
I find this with a lot of garages. 'Oh, it seemed alright to us,
therefore you must be lying'.
My throttle cable was sticking, (bit of a pain in a R5 Turbo!), took it
into a garage and this was their response. It was only after the car
nearly threw me into the back of the car in front that the problem
was bad enough for the garage to believe me.
Dave.
|
1179.277 | R19 Recall Notice | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Fri May 07 1993 10:40 | 24 |
| I've just had a recall notice on my 16V. It relates to the suspension
problems we all already know about, i.e.
"In the course of our continuous performance monitoring of our vehicle
range" (lots of people have phoned up to complain) "we have found
that under certain road conditions which may subject the suspension to
extraordinary shock loading," (you've been driving it, haven't you sir)
"the upper bearing housing which supports the front suspension strut
can crack." (will crumble like a mouldy cheese) "This may cause reduced
ride height on the affected side of the vehicle and some reduction in
steering efficiency." (When you wake upside down in a field ....) "we have
therefore actioned a safety recall of all our vehicles that may be
affected in order that a modification may be carried out." (....call us
and we'll lie to you about whether it needs fixing).
The recall notice came via PHH, and had no date on it. In fact, I
received two, one for me, and another for Kieron Chappell (it's in the
mail).
So, be careful out there...
Colin
|
1179.278 | Rattly head shield | DIBDIB::DBATES | Time for a note | Mon May 10 1993 15:40 | 12 |
| Well my 19 has just started making an intermittent grinding/rattling noise
that sounded like it was coming from the engine.
I took it to the garage and they said it's a known fault. One of the bolts
holding on the heat shield on the catalytic converter has come out.
The garage bloke said it wasn't serious and I could leave it until the next
service, unless the noise really bothered me.
Apparently it's about an hour's job to fix it.
So, what exactly does the heat shield do?
and is it really not worth bothering about?
|
1179.279 | So long as it doesn't fall off... | PEKING::SMITHRW | The Great Pyramid of Bloke | Tue May 11 1993 09:42 | 5 |
| I believe the cat has to run at serious temperatures to work properly.
The heat shield probably stops your carpets smouldering....
Richard
|
1179.280 | | NEWOA::BAILEY | I promise, R = S | Fri May 21 1993 17:55 | 7 |
|
has anyone has any recent quotes for the Chamade? (any model)
|
1179.281 | | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon May 24 1993 13:04 | 6 |
| The new turbo diesel advert states that:
All 19's now have side impact bars.
Greg
|
1179.282 | Overpriced IMO | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon May 24 1993 13:50 | 8 |
| .280 �recent quotes for the Chamade?
They no longer call it the Chamade. Its just plain R19 4door.
The quote in the preferred list is the same as the 3 door - �619
(see VTX).
Royston
|
1179.283 | | CYCLIC::TURNER | | Mon May 24 1993 14:11 | 6 |
| My R19 1.8I RT. Came in at 28 pounds which was definatly good value.
Its worth submitting a quote as they often come out much cheaper than the
prefered list.
Barrie.
|
1179.284 | zero cost for RT 1.9TD saloon | COMICS::MUNSLOW | Basingstoke CSC (7833 3157) - Comms SDU | Mon May 24 1993 22:27 | 5 |
|
My quota returned at 0 pounds cost for a R19 1.9TD RT. And I am looking
forward to driving it!
andy
|
1179.285 | Fuel gauge problems on 16V | KERNEL::EVERESTA | Yep....like the mountain!!! | Tue Jun 08 1993 15:20 | 19 |
|
Hi,
I drive a 1993 '19' 16V and yes it is blue!!! The question I have is
over the fuel gauge. I have always been wary of this digital display,
usually keeping a track of the miles covered on the mechanical trip
counter. Now, earlier today driving down the motorway the car starts
to miss-fire very much like it had run out of juice, yet the gauge
indicated I had 2.5 gallons left. I decided to try buying some petrol
so walked to a nearby service station (fortunate I had just passed it).
With this petrol the car started no problem, and the fuel gauge decided
to tell me I was low on petrol...great timing.
Has any other bod had problems with petrol gauges on these cars?
If not, just be careful they don't seam to be very good, bring back the
analogue displays.
Ade.
ps/ I'm to ring Renault and see if they know much about this.
|
1179.286 | Quality ? Nah, none of that in stock, Sir. | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Tue Jun 15 1993 13:39 | 49 |
| The fuel gauge is possibly the only thing that has not gone wrong on my
16V !! (Although it underestimates by up to a gallon).
The latest saga is as follows :
Driving to work yesterday, I'd gone about two miles (enough to warm the
car up), and I was driving in a traffic jam up a hill. I noticed that
the power was right down, and the car not firing properly. I had to use
3000-4000 revs to make sure the car did not stall when I let the clutch
out in 1st.
When I got to the top of the hill it was worse. A mile later I crawled
into a layby in the next village. I popped the bonnet and got out of
the car. Then I noticed SMOKE from under the engine and out of the
exhaust, along with some serious backfiring.
I decided that this would be a good time to turn the engine off and
vacate the vicinity. I even called the fire brigade (it looked that
bad!). When they turned up it was under control. They checked it, said
it was okay (though it smelt mighty strange), and advided me not to
drvie it again.
National Breakdown took the car to a Renault garage in Stockport.
Beware, PHH will only let them tow to the nearest garage, not the most
convenient. I.e. Stockport = 15miles, Warrington = 20 miles andf is
virtually next to the office. PHH said Stockport !! Swines.
I got the car back this morning, complete with a new distributor cap
and leads. They told be that it had disintegrated, badly effecting the
timing, and causing the aforementioned alarming effects. Sounds like
smelly bull to me.
It is now booked in for a 48,000 service at its normal garage(having
done nearly 49,000). I told them the story and they were sceptical as
well, so I've asked them to give it a good checkover when it is in next
week.
I told the man in Stockport that this is the woprst car I've ever had,
and I'm never going to have another Renault. He didn't seem too
bothered. I think I'll write to the MD of Renault UK, and copy the
letter to PHH who've picked up the tab for this.
I'm now at the pont where I can't wait to complete the next 10,000
miles to get shot of the car. Even if they change the sheme to all
Vauxhalls, a 1.2Merit Corsa has to be better than this lemon.
Yours in total frustration
Colin
|
1179.287 | Suitable supply? | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Tue Jun 15 1993 16:24 | 15 |
|
I am looking for a 12v supply for a piece of audio equipment in my
renault 19 16v. Short of taking it from the battery I cannot find a
suitable supply, as the fuse box is all closed up and hard wired you
can't simply add a spade connector. Does anybody know where I can pick
up a suitable supply?
What I have found is some spare cables under the gear lever gaiter,
they look like likely suspects but I thought I'd better not play with
them as I don't know what they do or where they are fed from/ratings
etc.
Can anybody help?
Richard (young@wlo)
|
1179.288 | Cigarrete Lighter? | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Tue Jun 15 1993 16:32 | 7 |
| Richard,
Either the cigarrete lighter, or if you pull out the whole plastic bit
where the cigarette lighter and tray are, you can see the wires going
to the ciggie lighter.
Greg
|
1179.289 | Sounds good! | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Tue Jun 15 1993 16:40 | 11 |
|
Good thinking that man, I also want to switch this supply which will
be running off to the boot so I can put a switch in the console thingy
round the gear-lever.(or even remove the ciggy lighter and put a switch
in the hole therefore removing the need to drill holes, and simply put
the ciggy lighter back at end of lease!)
thanks
Richard
|
1179.290 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Wed Jun 16 1993 17:22 | 6 |
| Why don't you go to a friendly car audio place, and ask them for advice?
The Renault 19 is the favourite Audio car according to one car audio place I
went to!
Mark
|
1179.291 | 2 clutch, 1 accelerator | LARVAE::MADELEY_T | I'm just F.I.N.E. | Thu Jun 17 1993 14:40 | 9 |
| Well this morning's little incident outside DEC Park makes it two clutch
cables and one accelerator cable broken in 26,000 miles - is this a record?
The replacement Peugeot 405, with less than 5000 miles handles like a
row boat and accelerates like a slug. It does have one advantage though
- you don't need to worry about losing the key because the engine
doesn't stop when you take it out anyway!!!
Depressed of Basingstoke...
|
1179.292 | | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Fri Jun 18 1993 20:55 | 7 |
|
What exactly are you doing to these cables I know several people who
have them who have no problems at all (except for the obvious
suspension mounts)
|
1179.293 | Anyone got a roof rack? | COMICS::NAYLER | Mike Nayler | Tue Jun 22 1993 11:29 | 14 |
|
Can anyone out there lend (rent) me, or tell me where I can rent
a roof rack or roof box for a 16V Renault 19. {required from 30/6/93 -
6/7/93)
I'm off on holiday to France and need the extra space so I can fill the
boot with beer, wine etc :-)))
Thanks Mike (Viables,UVO, 7-833-3771)
|
1179.294 | Warning - Next note is long ! | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Tue Jun 22 1993 16:46 | 4 |
| The next reply is rather long - it is a copy of my letter to Renault UK
detailing the various problems with my 19 16V.
Colin
|
1179.295 | Letter to Renault - Comments ? | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Tue Jun 22 1993 16:49 | 164 |
| Jim Worsley
Fleet Operations
Renault UK Limited
Western Avenue
London
W3 0RZ
Dear Jim,
Further to our telephone conversation last week, I am writing
to you to stress my extreme disappointment with Renault UK
and my particular car.
On 2nd August 1991, I took delivery of a Renault 19 16V
saloon, from Renault UK in Manchester. The car itself is
leased to Digital via PHH. Since I have had the car, it has
been a catalogue of problems and disasters, including
o Missing Trim on delivery.
o Incorrectly functioning radio/cassette - eventually
replaced at my insistence.
o Broken tension spring on gear linkage at 16,000 miles,
requiring the assistance of the RAC to enable me to drive
home.
o Replacement catalytic converter.
o Clutch replaced at 25,000 mile by Bellcharm in
Warrington.
o Suspected coolant leak at 36,000 mile service.
o First gear hub and selector shaft replaced at 37,000
miles.
o New shock absorbers to cure suspension grind at 37,000
miles.
o Front suspension mounting replaced at 42,000 miles due to
recall. (Recall notice arrived after this service).
o Fire under bonnet at 48,000 miles, requiring recovery to
Lookers of Stockport. Supposedly 'cured' by replacement
of distributor cap.
o New clutch cable, pedal, and bulkhead modification at
48,000 mile service.
Subsequent to the 48,000 mile service (carried out at 49,000
miles due to above problems), Willows of Northwich have
identified the following work that needs doing
o Strip down gear box to replace synchromesh/gear hub on
third gear.
o Replace non-functional oxygen sensor (probably caused by
above fire).
o Replace damaged spark plug/HT lead (possibly the actual
cause of the fire).
I have had occasion to visit all four Renault dealerships in
my area, and I am only satisfied with one (Willows of
Northwich). The others range from poor to abysmal.
o Renault UK, Manchester
Renault UK took an inordinate amount of time to order a
piece of plastic trim to replace the part missing on
delivery. When it arrived, it was the wrong colour. When
the correct colour was delivered, I had to argue with the
manager to persuade him to send me the part rather than
face a 45 mile round trip to pick it up.
When the indicator failed, I told the engineer that a new
relay was required. His attitude was that I did not know
what I was talking about. When I picked the car up, I was
told that a new relay was required and had been fitted.
After persistent problems with my radio/cassette, the
garage informed me that there was nothing wrong.
Eventually I persuaded the manager to replace the unit
with a new one, only to be told that he was not supposed
to fit new radios. There had been problems with these
units and they were supposed to be returned for repair.
o Bellcharm, Warrington
In July 1992, I experienced severe problems with changing
gear. I took the car to Bellcharm, as they had carried
out the 24,000 mile service. After a test drive I was
told they needed to strip the clutch and gearbox and that
this would take a few days. I was forced to hire a car
for this period. When I returned, I was informed that a
new clutch would need to be fitted.
By the 30,000 mile service, I was experiencing gearchange
problems again. I was told that parts would need to be
ordered, and they would call me when they were in.
Nothing happened. At the 36,000 mile service, the
gearchange problems were severe, and Bellcharm had the
car for a number of days.
New parts had to be fitted to the gearbox. Bellcharm
tried to suggest that the parts had worn out due to
driver misuse. My previous car (Vauxhall) covered 54,000
miles in two years without problem. It is now owned by my
father and has covered nearly 80,000 miles, and he has
experienced none of the problems I have had with the
Renault.
When I picked up the car from the garage, I asked for a
copy of the worksheet to refer to in case I experienced
further problems. I was refused. I eventually persuaded
the service manager to type me a letter with the details
(a copy of this is enclosed).
The day following the service I checked under the bonnet,
to discover that the radiator expansion chamber was
virtually empty. It took almost a litre of antifreeze to
fill it to the appropriate level. When I telephoned
Bellcharm and told them what had happened, the engineer
was most unhelpful (almost rude). He asked me how I knew
the chamber was empty - even though I had just explained
that I had had to take the cap off and fill it.
o Lookers, Stockport
On 14th June 1993, I was forced to abandon my car and
call the fire brigade when it started misfiring badly,
resulting in smoke from under the bonnet and exhaust.
When the fire brigade arrived, they examined the car and
told me not to drive it again.
The car was towed to Lookers in Stockport. Lookers
diagnosed the problem as a faulty distributor cap
disrupting the ignition timing. I find it hard to believe
that this caused the effects I have described, and the
burning smell that was obvious. Further, when waiting to
be served to pick my car up the next day, the service
was appallingly slow, with people being seen out of turn
because they knew the engineer behind the counter.
I have to say that I do not make a habit of complaining.
Indeed, I feel that I have been more than tolerant with both
my car and the Renault dealerships, given the problems that I
have experienced. The garage I currently use (Willows) are
superb.
Whilst my experiences are extreme, both PHH and colleagues
with Renault 19 16V cars suggest that they are not unique,
and that this model suffers more than its fair share of
problems. I am very disappointed in the quality of both the
Renault product and service I have experienced. I feel it
very unlikely that I would choose Renault again, and I could
not recommend Renault to my friends or colleagues.
I would appreciate your comments as to whether my experiences
reflect the image and quality that you believe Renault
should represent.
Yours sincerely,
Colin Smith
CC: Mr M. Gigou, Managing Director, Renault UK
Mr K. Jones, PHH
|
1179.296 | Some people are just unlucky | BAHTAT::FORCE6::hilton | Party on Dudes | Tue Jun 22 1993 17:09 | 14 |
| >> Whilst my experiences are extreme, both PHH and colleagues
>> with Renault 19 16V cars suggest that they are not unique,
I've had no problems with mine, but it's under a year old!
Also Colin, I reckon you must have got one of the very first batches, seeing
as your sunroof doesn't tilt etc etc.
Looks like your car was a beta test release.
:^)
Greg
|
1179.297 | Thanks, Greg | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Tue Jun 22 1993 17:25 | 12 |
| The car may be Beta test, but my letter isn't ;-)
Next time you're in Warrington, I'll beta test you with a tyre wrench,
Mr Hilton, unless something falls off your car pretty soon ! :-) :-)
Seriously, though, have you had the suspension recall notice yet, or
the free change to the clutch assembly (i.e. Field Change Order) ? If
not, I'd have words with your garage.
Now, when do I take delivery of my Corsa 1.2 Merit ?
Colin
|
1179.298 | One for Mike. | FORTY2::BRIDPORT | Blimey, that's good. | Tue Jun 22 1993 17:26 | 6 |
|
Re: .293
Roof Rack = more room for Frozen Chickens
Cluck cluck *;)
|
1179.299 | Not too Strong. Give them Hell. | KIRKTN::AGIBSON | Alan Gibson | Tue Jun 22 1993 17:51 | 59 |
|
re: 1179.295
Colin,
I think for the amount of 'grief' this car has caused you the letter
sent was very tame.
My previous car was R19, not the 16v, and on the occasions when
there was a problem with the car the attitude of the dealer where I
bought the car was disgusting.
The first instance was when the car persistantly 'flooded'. This
problem resulted in one visit from the RAC in the carpark in DEC Ayr,
five or six visits to the garage. The RAC man said 'this is a common
problem, take it to your dealer'. Dealer said 'we have never seen this
before, it must be the way you start-up and drive the car'.
On the last visit, when they actually managed to cure the problem, I
spent an hour explaining the symptoms and the cure to the workshop
foreman. On this ocassion as with all the rest I was treated like an
idiot, they all seem to think the customers have NO understanding of
the workings of a motor vehicle. The upshot was that they finally
lookedat the float chamber jet and what do you think, Yes they found
the problem. Then they handed me a bill for an hour's labour!!
The second and the deciding factor with respect to buying an other
Renault was when the car was in for a 30k sevice. The day after the car
was difficult to start and once running was misfiring. When I opened
the bonnet I found the plug leads for pots 3 & 4 swapped, I restored it
to its original state only to find the lead to 4 was shortened by about
3". I called the garage and demanded that the situation be fixed. Half
an hour later a mechanic came out with a plug lead and fitted it. This
sounds alright but the lead looked like something that had been kicked
about the workshop floor for a few months, and didn't even match the
original set. The mechanic when I challanged him about this said 'if
you want them to match you will have to buy a new set, that'll cost you
28 pounds'.
When I finally cooled down and was able to speak calmly I called
the dealer again to talk to the service manager. He was conviently on
a half day! It took a rather heated phone call to the sales manger to
get this situation corrected.
So you are only one who has problem with his dealer, these attitudes
seems to be very common amongst Renault Dealer employees. On the other
hand my parents also have a Renault and have no problem with their
dealership, and its Arnold Clark!! Me, well now have an Astra.
Alan.
|
1179.300 | shhh It's been good so far | COMICS::NAYLER | Mike Nayler | Tue Jun 22 1993 17:59 | 14 |
|
Now I am worried my 16V is in for it's first service on Thursday and
it's going to Herds of Basinkstoke (fingers crossed). So far no problems,
except the bolt that hold the drivers side seat belt to the door pillar fell
out and I had to screw it back in!!!!!!
And a few rattles......
Mike. still looking for a roof rack... I can even see how one would fit
on!
Nigle shut up you silly boy.
|
1179.301 | Get a Good Engineer | GALLOP::GLEDHILLS | No Brakes, No Steering | Wed Jun 23 1993 14:03 | 25 |
| Re: last few
I guess a lot of this boils down to the quality of the garage and its
mechanics. My 19 16V is nearly 2 years old (I've had it for one year)
and it's had a very similar mechanical history of disasters (mainly due
to the manic driving of the previous owner). On average something has
gone wrong with the car every 3-4 weeks, BUT the service that I've
received from my local Renault garage has been nothing short of
excellent, largely due to the skill and experience of their chief
mechanic, and his interest in high performance cars (his skills are
highly sought-after by RAC rally teams.
As for the other Renault dealers in the area, ...
Yes, there are duff cars, Friday afternoon cars, beta test cars, but at
the end of the day your perception of the car and the Manufacturer are
largely down to the quality of service received.
I would certainly have another 19 16V - bit too expensive at the
moment though, so my order's in for the CLIO 16V - and looking
forward to 2nd August.
Sue
|
1179.302 | Response this morning ! | WARNUT::SMITHC | one careful owner, low mileage !! | Fri Jun 25 1993 10:43 | 20 |
| Dear Mr Smith
Thank you for your letter dated 21st June 1993, regarding your
experiences with the Renault 19 you drive.
In answer to your final paragraph we do not, for one minute, expect any
of our products to perform in a manner which leads to the necessity for
a customer to record three pages of complaints.
On the very rare occasions we do receive such a letter, obviously we
would wish to fully investigate the complaint made and, therefore, we
will do so.
Please accept our apologies for the inconvenience caused and after some
detailed enquiries, I will make contact with you again.
Yours sincerely
JVH Worsley
Consultant, Fleet Service
|
1179.303 | Where's the post | EBYGUM::HUGHESS | | Fri Jul 16 1993 15:48 | 6 |
| Colin
Its been 3 weeks, any news?
Simon eagerly awaiting Renaults reply.
|
1179.304 | R19 Radio hum | CYCLIC::TURNER | | Thu Aug 05 1993 14:25 | 26 |
| I took deleivery of my R19 RT 1.8i earlier this year, I have now done
8000 miles in it and realy like the car, in fact I'd recomend it to
anybody who fancied the 16V hatch but realy needs the extra two doors
at the back.
The only problem I have with the car is that I seem to get a lot of
"hum" on the radio. I have asked the local Renault dealer ( DTM in
Reading ) to sort this out a couple of times.
Their response is to say that I must be listening to weak radio
stations and playing bad tapes !, I know this isnt true. I have pointed
out to them that the frequency of the hum is related to the speed of
the engine and have even pointed the noise out to them but they have
not fixed it, and are trying to tell me that all Renault 19 radios have
the same problem.
Have any of you R19 drivers out there noticed this problem ? Is there
anyone who will let me try their radio ?
The radio in my car is a 6 speaker phillips set with the steering column
mounted controls. ( my model does not have RDS ) There is an input for
a CD player and I am thinking of investing in a portable one to use in
the car but there isnt much point if the sound is going to be marred by
the current hum.
Barrie.
|
1179.305 | Its only hum... | EBYGUM::PAGETS | Still Working | Thu Aug 05 1993 15:19 | 12 |
| Yup,
I've complained about interference to weak signaled radio stations,
and the service guy did explained, but its something to do with the
route that the power cable takes, and it being a bad design
fault...probably the least serious one on the 19 16V that I have. I'll
put up with it so long as the suspension doesn't leak, give way,
squeak, engine seize, gearbox sticks, etc. On this car I've had it
all. I've given up trying to rectify things, and put up with most of
it.
Sean.
|
1179.306 | There all the same | WIZDUM::DAVE | Durelli, Gripping Stuff !!! | Thu Aug 05 1993 15:35 | 14 |
| The radio on the Primeria I got recently wasn't working (along with other
things), couldn't hold on to a signal. I mentioned this to the service dept of
Davenport Vernon, Rosekiln Lane Reading. Answers were :
You don't get good radio reception in Reading.
Its the dark nights (I was listening to FM)
The radio was replaced by the same model, this as worked well ever since, even
on dark reading nights !
seems all service departments are the same.
Durelli.
|
1179.307 | Here we go again ! | WOTVAX::SMITHCO | Live and Dangerous | Thu Aug 05 1993 15:47 | 25 |
| re:305 - Sean, p'haps we should start a club - the R19 16V fan club
NOT!
Mine is now back in the garage to have the gearbox problems
investigated. They stripped it down yesterday, and have ordered 'lots'
of parts today. The debate will be who pays for it, PHH or Renault.
Parts apparently include 3rd gear cog, 3rd gear synchro, and a widget
that is supposed to hold the gears together (forget what it is called -
something like 'circlip'). It appears that this could be what has
caused the problems, and may not have been re-assembled properly the
last time the gearbox was stripped by a different garage !
I phoned Renault this week to follow up on my letter, and to inform
them the car was going into the garage, and that I did not expect
'driver abuse' to be cited as the cause. I also told the guy that I'd
be interested in what recompense Renault were going to offer me when it
is all over (if it ever is). "Hmmm, it's difficult to put a value on
something like that, isn't it" he said. "Yes, that's why I'll be
interested to see your respone" I replied !!! This is like a bad novel.
He has heard from some of the garages I complained about. Their
response was generally to blame personnel, who were mysteriously no
longer with them. I think I detect a funny smell.
Colin_actually_looking_forward_to_a_1.2_Corsa_Merit.
|
1179.308 | Been there once,on the way again! | BAHTAT::TOWNSEND_D | What me ?.......Never | Thu Aug 05 1993 17:54 | 13 |
|
What is it about the R19 16V gearbox ? Mine is now back on the road
after having 5th gear syncro and cog replaced,the problem now is that
it `crunches' into 3rd and 4th !! The garage were unable to explain
what had caused the problem but thought it might be to do with driving
fast !! I did enquire as to what speed I should drive at - so that the
damm car would'nt break - I am still waiting for the reply.
Colin I hope the garage have ordered the correct parts,they
did`nt for mine and it took 5 days to get them - gearbox
parts for the latest 16V are not so easy to come by!!
mine
|
1179.309 | ICE woes | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Thu Aug 05 1993 18:25 | 17 |
| My radio has a hum in the right hand front speaker, only noticable when
I play quiet CD's or listen to the cricket on Medium wave!
Also when I unplug the 3.5mm jack from the radio CD socket the whole
thing is dead, ie lights on no sound. I have to jiggle it in and out to
get the sound back.
The local Renault garage said it was a specialist job to fix, and I'd
have to take it to a specalist car Hi-Fi shop to get fixed. This sounds
like a load of bull to me, especially as the car is under one year old,
ie warrannty.
Has anyone had ICE systems fixed at a Renault garage?
I guess I could try the main Leeds dealer..
Greg
|
1179.310 | A coat hanger will do ! | SEDSWS::OXFORD | eezer good ! | Fri Aug 06 1993 13:08 | 30 |
|
re a few back.
Regarding noise from the radio on week stations.
I was getting it on the Phillips stereo aswell (which b.t.w. i think is
a crap system). I recently changed mine and have now got a top of the
range Pioneer set installed, guess what, same problem.
I spoke to the people who installed it and theysuggested a few things
that could cause it.
1)The aerial lead runs up the door pillar along with some power cables
(for sunroof, interior light, alarm sensor).
2)The power for the radio does run in a large loom and could pick up
interfernce from that.
3)The aerials are crap.
They ran all new power leads direct from the battery for the
stereo, c.d. and amp etc, so nothing goes through the existing wiring
loom. It was better but is still there.
Next they suggest either fitting a Bosch aerial which has a built in
amplifier (as fitted to Golfs and Corrados, and cost #45) or fit a new
aerial on to the wing. If you go for the new Bosch aerial you will
still be using the existing aerial coax, this could be changed but
there is no guarantee that it is not the route it is following that is
causing it to pick up interference.
I am trying a new aerial at the weekend, if it fixes it i'll keep
it, if not i,ll try a new aerial on the wing.
I,ll let you know what happens.
Nick.
|
1179.311 | Here we go, here we go, here..... | WOTVAX::SMITHCO | Live and Dangerous | Fri Aug 06 1993 16:43 | 50 |
| re:308
It gets better.
Spoke to the garage this morning at 10.15. Parts not arrived.
Garage phoned me at 2.00ish, parts not arrived, but on their way.
Delivery truck had broken down. Car should be ready Monday. This is not
a lot of use, because I shall be down south in meetings until
Wednesday.
Phoned Fleet Operation guy at Renault (Jim Worsley) to voice my
continued concern, particularly since I shall have to drive around for
a week in a Rover 214, and be without the carphone that is a vital
business tool. (No - my meetings are not in Digital offices).
Jim basically didn't care. "Looks like you're stuck with the Rover,
then" were the exact words. "I'm not supposed to talk to you, PHH don't
like it, I'm supposed to talk to them". Some heated discussion
followed.
I phoned PHH to apply some pressure, and to find out why they'd not
been chasing Renault. The man who usually deals with Digital is off
sick, but as far as I can tell they've not chased Renault in the last 7
weeks. I gave forth on my views on both Renault and PHH. This probably
didn't achieve much, but my objectives have changed from getting my car
fixed asap to generating grief for anyone in my path.
I have just been speaking to the Fleet Operations Director's PA at
Renault (the Director is on holiday). We'll see what result we get from
that !! The phone cut off in the middle of the conversation - p'haps
this is an omen.
The problem is essentially one of the captive market. I already have
the car, so Renault have their money. PHH are sole supplier. There is
no incentive for anyone to help me.
I was feeling quite bullish about the new car scheme. I am now quite
worried, because I can see us being even more of a captive audience in
the new scheme.
Oh well
Colin
NEWSFLASH NEWSFLASH
PHH have just phoned (3.30 pm) - Renault have agreed to contribute to
upgrade my car to a 2.0i Cavalier equivalent. Wow - I got a concession
!!!!!
|
1179.312 | It could be worse...It could have been a lada | PAKORA::SWRIGHT | | Fri Aug 06 1993 17:18 | 2 |
| You poor thing.... having to drive around in a Rover 214, What will
the neighbours say... *:@)
|
1179.313 | ounds I | YUPPY::MILLARB | | Fri Aug 06 1993 17:21 | 57 |
| Colin
I sympathise with you. Last year I went through a similar execise with
car Fleet, Hertz and Toyota. This despite the fact that Toyota fully
and completletly admitted that their car was faulty and they could not
fix it !!
Toyota offered !! to buy the car back but Hertz blocked this saying
that Digital would have to pick up the incremental costs of early
termination on the lease.
Toyota offered to replace the car with an uprated version and it was
newer. Digital refused because this would be a "second hand car".
I eventually dealt directly with Toyota UK's managing director who
dealt with Hertz in an attempt to resolve the issue.
Just as I thought things were getting sorted, I got a snotty call from
Hertz telling me I had had no right to deal with the manufacturer and
they would sort it out.
Six weeks later (car still in garage (digital paying for hired car) The
garage phoned and openly stated that they were "sick and tired" of the
lease company trying to get them to admit to "driver abuse" (the main
wiring harness had melted and the cam shaft pulley had sheared off).
Net result:
Toyota thought that we and the lease company were stark raving mad !!
they insisted in buying the car back from the lease compay (no cost to
me) They also gave me a huge !! discount on my current car.
My faith in Digitals (then car scheme management was reduced to nil)
My opinion of the lease company as an effective and supportive aid is
notworth putting into print.
My faith in Toyota is high. At all times they attempted to do the
right thing and sort me (the customer) and my car.
Lessons learnt:
Deal with the manufacturer direct. If you want to avoid being accused
of deliberately wrecking your car.
Mail Doug Arnold for assistance as he looks like he is providing a
realistic control on what was a poor system and is succeeding.
Sorry if this seems negative. But it still gets to me the way that
Digital and the Lease company reused to sort their customer out.
Bruce
PS:
My car had SEVENTEEN visits to the GARAGE in ELEVEN MONTHS including
tow ins trailers (once with a customer in the car)
|
1179.314 | What was it? | VARDAF::CHURCH | Dave Church@VBE (DTN 828-6125) | Mon Aug 09 1993 08:52 | 7 |
| RE: .313
Bruce,
What Toyota did you have?
Dave
|
1179.315 | | YUPPY::MILLARB | | Mon Aug 09 1993 11:58 | 10 |
| Dave
It was a SUPRA 3.0i well dicumented elsewhere in this conference.
I now have a Celica (Carlos Sainz 4wd variant) so far I have found
that to be excellent !! (kiss of death)
Regards
Bruce
|
1179.316 | IT'S FIXED !!!!! (Touch wood - ssssshhhh!!) | WOTVAX::SMITHCO | Live and Dangerous | Fri Aug 13 1993 18:15 | 31 |
| So, here we go, here we go.....
Got the car back on Wednesday. They'd fixed the gearbox on Monday, but
the part for the boot lock had to ordered from France and didn't arrive
until Wednesday.
Gearbox seems fine so far. I'm off to visit the family down south next
week, so we'll see if it holds up. They brakes seem a bit spongey now.
Mind you, the hire car had on-off brakes, i.e. fully on or fully off !
When it goes back for it's next service, they'll give me a copy of the
job sheet. I'll post a report then on how many bits they needed !!
I got a letter from the man at Renault last tuesday. I've forgotten to
bring it in, but basically it is what I assumed it would be. In other
words, the garages are all very sorry, but they've changed their
personnel, and things should be better now. Mr Renault had 'noted the
comments' I had made to him on the phone. As a result of the latest
problem, he had agreed to pay PHH to upgrade the hire car to a higher
level.
I read this as 'You phoned my boss's boss, you b&^$�@d, and dropped me
in it'! It has cost Renault �22 per day so that I could have a Pug 405
GRi. Much more comfortable and better for long trips to Coventry. Nice
feature - the windscreen washers pump water directly from the wiper
blade rather than a nozzle as on most cars. Very effective.
I suspect that Renault will justify this as their 'concession' to all
the problems I've had. Needless to say, Renault are unlikely to be on
my personal or company car shopping list for some time.
Colin - test driving Skodas
|
1179.317 | Heres to a trouble free 19! | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Mon Aug 16 1993 16:24 | 15 |
| Just got my Renault 19 16V delivered. One of the last cheaper Renaults on the
car scheme!
It has to follow my Clio 16V, and 2 previous Renault 5 GT Turbo's.
To summarise, the car is quiet, the handling and cornering is incredibly stable
(must be part of the long wheelbase). The car appears to be well made, with only
one small rattle (due to a missing screw), which I managed to replace.
It has 4 doors, and is just right for my possible future family!
I'm hoping that the performance will get as good as my Clio, but it would be
lovely if it got to be as good as the 5!
Mark.
|
1179.318 | Fuel pump=dodgey | BLKPUD::HUGHESS | | Thu Sep 16 1993 21:10 | 6 |
| Well 42,000 mile service up and third fuel pump replacement.
Does anyone else have problems with their fuel pumps, ie noise, loss of
power?
Simon
|
1179.319 | No problems...yet! | KERNEL::BAYLISD | Filth Daemon from Hell | Fri Sep 17 1993 10:07 | 7 |
| I'm coming up to 11,000 miles in mine and no problems with the fuel
pump so far. However, when I had the R5 GT Turbo, the fuel pump went on
it at around 40,000 miles. It lost pressure to start with, which was
okay providing you weren't sitting it stop-start traffic!
Dave.
|
1179.320 | Oil Pressure Problems | BAHTAT::TOWNSEND_D | What me ?.......Never | Fri Sep 17 1993 16:48 | 12 |
|
My R19 16V is 8 months old with 27,000 miles and so far the only
problems have been:-
3 x Oil Pressure Gauges.......there is a known problem with these.
2 x Exhaust Pipes.............this is also a known problem.
All of these parts have been fitted in the last 2 weeks and they have
all been of the modified type - not very well modified IMO - but apart
from that the car has been pretty well trouble free.
Doug
|
1179.321 | | VESSA::GOSWELLR | Looney in the making >> | Fri Sep 17 1993 22:25 | 13 |
| My R19 16v is now on 16,000+ miles and I have had no
mechanical problems with it,
Small electrical problem. All electric die, Lights,
Computer, Indicators, +
Fix has been to turn the car off and on again. Renault
can find no fault ???????????????????
Tow bar snapped of at the upright support straps.
Been replaced with a new one. This has been re-enforced
so must have been a known problem.
Roger
|
1179.322 | Most reliable car on the road!. | COMICS::TRAVELL | John T, UK VMS System Support | Sat Sep 18 1993 17:04 | 6 |
| Mine is now approaching 4 years old, and nearly 75K miles. The ONLY problem I
have EVER had with it was a coolant leak from a brazed joint on a manifold
connection near the cylinder head. I put some BLU-TAC on it until I could get
it in to be fixed properly.
John T.
|
1179.323 | Clutch cable... | MANTA::SIMON | WHALE: "Life's a beach and then you die..." | Mon Sep 20 1993 09:49 | 12 |
|
All R19 and CLIO owners get your clutches checked.
There is a mod required on the clutch cable (not again) and the clutch pedal
that is only being done when the car goes in for a service AND they have the
parts on the shelf.
If this mod isn't done, you may end up like my wife...Stuck in the middle of
nowhere with no phone and no clutch...
Simon
|
1179.324 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Mon Sep 20 1993 10:09 | 1 |
| Curious to know if the clutch cable affects car phones?
|
1179.325 | More info on tow-bar breakage please! | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Mon Sep 27 1993 17:28 | 11 |
| RE:.321
Please tell more about the tow-bar, was it a Renault one, what were you
doing at the time and was it very hairy!
Richard
R19 driver with a tow-bar
Ps. I have a rear window sign that reads "If you can read this sign
I've lost my caravan".......but its supposed to be there for a laugh, I
didn't really expect to lose it!
|
1179.326 | Tow Bar Baddies | VESSA::GOSWELLR | Looney in the making >> | Mon Sep 27 1993 17:36 | 15 |
| RE .-1
I was reversing an empty trailor onto a friends driveway at the time.
( Lucky as I had only just been to the local Breakers yard with a worn out banger)
All I heard was a bang and everything stopped. Large chunk of tarmac missing from
the road and rear bumber dislodged.
This was dealer fitted (delivered early March 93) and the replacement is a heavier
duty looking unit.
All supporting struts are twice the origoinal size.
regards
Roger
|
1179.327 | | DIBDIB::DBATES | Time for a note | Tue Oct 19 1993 15:33 | 30 |
| Recently had the heater control knob replaced as it fell off
my 16V
Any guess as to how must this costs to be replaced by a garage?
�81.00
I'm glad PHH are paying
|
1179.328 | | NSDC::SIMPSON | The future sure isn't what it used to be | Tue Oct 19 1993 16:59 | 5 |
| RE: -.1
You were lucky! (See next note for why).
-Steve
|
1179.329 | | NEWOA::BAILEY | Its TKD for me | Mon Oct 25 1993 12:05 | 11 |
|
anyone else got a problem with even even runing at slow speeds?
I find that if i'am run at (about) 1500-2500 revs (ie crawling in traffic
or searching for a parking space) then the car (16 V) seems to be
runing on kangeroo petrol! one minute it seems as if its about to stall
then it wants to run away with me
its been into the shop twice now to sort this out.. but they are still
looking for the cause
|
1179.330 | Change Up | FUTURS::LONGWY::LEWIS | Amused to Death | Mon Oct 25 1993 13:28 | 5 |
| Try changing up a gear, it will give the engine something to work
against. You don't need to have the engine screaming at 1500-2500 when
you are crawling along looking for a parking space.
Rob
|
1179.331 | | NEWOA::BAILEY | Its TKD for me | Tue Oct 26 1993 09:12 | 8 |
| <<< Note 1179.330 by FUTURS::LONGWY::LEWIS "Amused to Death" >>>
-< Change Up >-
> Try changing up a gear, it will give the engine something to work
> against. You don't need to have the engine screaming at 1500-2500 when
> you are crawling along looking for a parking space.
screaming? at 1500 revs?
|
1179.332 | Hmmm, I've just re-read that! | PLUNDR::MORAN | They can't be my shorts, they bend! | Tue Oct 26 1993 09:45 | 8 |
|
>Recently had the heater control knob replaced as it fell off
>my 16V
My knob fell off recently too. Hertz refused to pay for it (citing
driver abuse). Eventually, they agreed to pay half.
Tim
|
1179.333 | | ARRODS::SMITHA | Il y a une sange, dans l'arbre | Tue Oct 26 1993 09:58 | 6 |
| > My knob fell off recently too. Hertz refused to pay for it (citing
> driver abuse). Eventually, they agreed to pay half.
>
> Tim
fnarr, fnarr.
|
1179.334 | I knew someone had to say it... | WELSWS::HEDLEY | Lager Lout | Tue Oct 26 1993 13:03 | 0 |
1179.335 | Belated smiley | FUTURS::LONGWY::LEWIS | Amused to Death | Tue Oct 26 1993 13:41 | 12 |
| re .331,
;-)
Seriously though, the type of behaviour I think you are describing
sometimes occurs if you try to drive slowly in first gear with an
engine that is chucking out a lot more power than is required for the
speed. You end up with a sort of feed-back loop between your throttle
inputs and the cars speed which causes the stop/go effect. By changing
up, and relying more on the torque of the motor, you dampen out the
effect. It may be worth the experiment.
Rob
|
1179.336 | | NEWOA::BAILEY | Its TKD for me | Tue Oct 26 1993 16:28 | 3 |
| I can see/feel the problem if I drive at 1500-2000 revs in 2nd gear
... the problem seems to be get _better_ if i change down!
(changing up to 3rd stalls the car)
|
1179.337 | | FUTURS::LONGWY::LEWIS | Amused to Death | Wed Oct 27 1993 08:38 | 4 |
| Of course, this is where my theory falls to the ground.
:-)
|
1179.338 | Flakey immobiliser fun... | KERNEL::BAYLISD | Filth Daemon from Hell | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:52 | 18 |
|
Came out this morning to start the motor, switched off the immobiliser,
turned the key and the engine promptly turned over, but wouldn't fire!
Messed around a bit with the key switch for the immobiliser, still
nothing, so time to call my friends at the RAC!!!
Anyway, an hour later the RAC turn up, checks it all out, umm's and
arr's a bit until I mention the immobiliser at which point he focuses
his attention on this. He plugs the key in, wiggles it about a bit, and
then he manages to start it up.
That's one seriously good immobiliser I've got!!
Renault are having the car on Friday!
Dave.
|
1179.339 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Wed Nov 17 1993 15:29 | 5 |
| The immobiliser is automatic now, and doesn't use an extra key.
I had fun when the lock disappeared behind the glovebox on my last Clio.
Mark.
|
1179.340 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Fri Dec 10 1993 16:53 | 45 |
| Hi,
Thought I'd report on my first 6600 miles with a Renault 19 16V.
I'm comparing it with my previous Clio 16V (I had this for 6 months), and
previous Renault 5 GT Turbos.
Performance is fine. It's not in the league of my 5 Turbo's, and not yet as
fast as the Clio 16V was. I think that a lot of it is perception, however.
The power delivery is very smooth, and can fool the driver into thinking that
it doesn't accelerate as well. It does need some revs to really work well.
Handling is absolutely superb. It feels completely unshakeable on corners
(except in the wet), and there is no trace of the nervousness I had with my
second R5GTT.
The ride is the best of the 3 previous cars, although you don't normally buy
car like this for smooth ride. It isn't a match for the best "standard"
saloons.
Reliability has been good too. I never really had any problems with the Clio,
but had quite a few with the R5GTT's.
I took the car in for it's first service at Herd's in Basingstoke with 2
problems:
- Suspension squeaks when heavily loaded (i.e. 4 people and luggage)
- Rear demister doesn't work.
They fixed the suspension squeaks (I was amazed!), saying that it was some valve
in the braking system that compensates for heavier load.
They replaced the blown fuse on the Rear demister. They attributed this to the
car phone installation.
Only 2 queries:
What are the gas canisters, and wires going to the seats ? Are they seat belt
pre tensioners?
Why no grab handles for passengers ?
Mark Jeffery
|
1179.341 | Tyre supply problems | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Wed Dec 15 1993 16:42 | 37 |
|
For anybody with a Renault 19 16v.
If you need tyres you may run into problems.
I recently (about a month ago) needed a tyre after a puncture, so I
went to my local Kwik-fit, they said we don't keep those in stock they
are a special tyre made by good-year for the 19 16v but we'll get you
one , on phoning they were told that good-year don't make these special
tyres any more, and good-year recommend fittin NCT 2's in pairs only,
PHH said no fit Michelin MXV 2's in singles. So an MXV2 was duly
obtained and fitted (as the spare, as I didn't fancy mixing special
good-years and Michelins on the same axle and the guy at Kwik-fit didnt
either)
Well now I need a pair on the front as one is almost on 1.6mm and the
others not far off, "I'll order you a pair in" said the man, only to
find that Michelin don't have any available in the country! I guess
this may be due to increased demand because the good-year specials have
stopped and big leasing co.'s are recommending fitment of MXV2's.
The nice man at Kwik-fart said "no problem I'll phone round and find
some, one of our branches must have them!" ......but he could only
locate one and that was in Edinburgh (I live in Essex) he's going to
get one and swap them round so I have the pair of new ones on the front
and the nearly worn-out one as the spare , even though this involves
swapping tyres on rims as the spare is a steel rim.
But this looks like it could be a big problem!
Does anybody know of another tyre suplier that has heaps of them in
stock? or have any other experiences to add?
Richard
Ps. All four tyres seem to be wearing more in the centre of the tread
although I am running them at the recommended 28lbs, the man at
Kwik-flat said it is quite normal to get that sort of wear pattern on
tyres as wide as that, but do you know different?
By the way mines done 16,500 how does that compare to other peoples
replacement mileage?
|
1179.342 | the continentals are *really* good in the wet as well.... | WOTVAX::STONEG | So hard, finding inspiration.... | Wed Dec 15 1993 17:24 | 22 |
|
>>> Ps. All four tyres seem to be wearing more in the centre of the tread
>>> although I am running them at the recommended 28lbs, the man at
>>> Kwik-flat said it is quite normal to get that sort of wear pattern on
>>> tyres as wide as that, but do you know different?
Richard, I had this problem on my Manta and both 2.8 Capri's using
205/60 VR13's, the tyre pressure won't really make a difference - unless
of course you make them too soft, in which case you wreck the sidewalls
or the car depending on how lucky you are 8^) - the problem I believe
is the centrifugal force coupled with the wide/low profile....
One tyre place I tried recommended fitting Bridgestone RE71's as they
have a harder compound in the centre of the tyre, unfortunately this
would have been a special order due to the 13inch rims, and my tyres
were already wearing thin...
a second idea was to fit those Continental Aqua things, they have a
tread pattern with the middle cut out, so only the outer thirds touch
the road, - They don't do these in 13 inch sizes at all though %^(
Graham
|
1179.343 | | PAKORA::SWRIGHT | The Day the world turned Day-Glow | Thu Dec 16 1993 08:08 | 8 |
| re -2
What size of tyre's does it use..? It wouldn't be 195/55/15 the same
size as the 21 turbo...??
Steve
|
1179.344 | Tyre pressure too high? | BAHTAT::HILTON | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Fri Dec 17 1993 10:47 | 6 |
| Are you sure its 28 lbs pressure? I'm sure it's lower than that, around
24 I think.
Cheers,
Greg
|
1179.345 | Goodbye, Renault, I must leave you... | WOTVAX::SMITHCO | Live and Dangerous | Fri Dec 17 1993 12:43 | 9 |
| Tyre size is 195/50 15"
Pressure is 28lbs front and rear.
However - the tyres on my new (takeover) car are 205/60 MXV2s, 27lbs
front, 31lbs rear. Two doors, rear wheel drive, and no bloody rattles
!!!!!! ;-)
Colin_so_sad_to_lose_his_Renault_NOT !
|
1179.346 | Good-Year Eagle NCT 50`s | BAHTAT::TOWNSEND_D | What me ?.......Never | Fri Dec 17 1993 13:18 | 19 |
|
I also had a problem trying to get NCT 50`s for my R19 16v.When I went
to Tyreservices (part of Good-Year I believe) they also said they
were`nt made anymore and that I would have to have NCT 2`s fitted.They
ordered them and fitted them with no problems from PHH.When I next went
back for a pair for the rear..no problem...they had 8 x NCT 50`s in
stock !!!
The Tyreservices GB Ltd I use are in Workington,Cumbria so if you need
any then they have quite a few left.
Front set changed at 10500 miles
Rear set changed at 21000 miles
New front set needed soon 36000 miles.
PHH have also struck a special deal with Good-Year and they get these
tyres 250 pounds cheaper!!!!!
Doug
|
1179.347 | How much are the Goodyears? | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Fri Jan 07 1994 16:58 | 11 |
|
Doug,
250 pounds cheaper than what? The Michelin MXV2's fitted to the front
of mine cost 75 pounds each (price to PHH)
They were frightening in the wet when new, but once run in a bit (200
miles or so) seem to be okay, although I would say not quite as good as
the goodyears in the wet.
Richard
|
1179.348 | | UFHIS::GVIPOND | tobed@2witha10woke@10witha2 | Thu Feb 17 1994 15:19 | 6 |
| � Renault 19 16V, with the clutchless gear change that the Clio will
� apparently be getting!
Is this simular to Tiptronic ? if it is I think your better off with
the manual.
|
1179.349 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Thu Feb 17 1994 18:40 | 7 |
| Don't know if it is similar. It was in one of the car magazines, as
being put into the new Clio Williams.
I fancy the idea myself. I like the idea of controlling the gears, but
the heavy Renault clutch in stop start traffic is a nightmare!
Mark.
|
1179.350 | Mesh the cogs yourself | ESBS01::WATSON | Arm yourself bomb | Fri Feb 18 1994 08:52 | 22 |
| Whats so bad about the Tiptronic auto box ?
I was lead to beleive that this was a pretty neat piece of stuff which
for 99% of drivers would have that car in the right gear at the right
time (Though the driver might not think so).
Took all sorts of things into account
- engine temperature
- forward and lattal acceleration
- etc
And you could always use it as a manual 'box if you got board.
The alternative a'la Ferrari Mondial where you have a manual box but no
(user accesible) clutch has it's problems -especially on Ferrari's
because the box is still a pig to get in 2nd when the engine is cold
but the stress is taken by the clutch not the ab-user hence excess
clutch wear.
Rik Who'd like the 6 speed honest-it's-a-911 Carrera and no auto
box thank you very much :-)
|
1179.351 | | LEMAN::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @GEO, DTN 821-4150 | Fri Feb 18 1994 09:50 | 14 |
| .349� Don't know if it is similar. It was in one of the car magazines, as
.349� being put into the new Clio Williams.
Aren't you refering to the gearbox used on WRC Clios ? That's a proto
sequential gearbox like on motorbikes, some F1s, etc ...
The Valeo gearbox is available on certain Ferrari's. It's similar to
the good old Porsche Sportomatic gearbox ie it declutches as soon as
you put your hand on the gear lever but you still have to move the
lever to engage gears.
The other alternative, which I found very interesting, is the PDK. It's
both sequential and has 2 clutches so one can program the next gear. It
was used on certain WRC Audis and WSCC Porsche 962s.
|
1179.352 | Romulas, Remus and those nice white mice | ESBS01::WATSON | Arm yourself bomb | Fri Feb 18 1994 11:10 | 11 |
| Talking of gearboxes what ever happened to "preselector" gear boxes
which uses to be found on racing car of old (E.R.A. comes to mind).
With these you chose the gear you wanted via the gear stick but the car
only changed to that gear when you depressed the clutch.
I can think of a number of times where I know I'm going to want to
change down a gear just as soon as it won't destroy the engine but
having to take a hand off the wheel, double-de-clutch, steer and break
gets a bit much.
Rik
|
1179.353 | I can remember driving one, but can't remember what it was now. Ah! Memories! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Fri Feb 18 1994 12:20 | 10 |
|
>>> Talking of gearboxes what ever happened to "preselector" gear boxes
>>> With these you chose the gear you wanted via the gear stick but the car
>>> only changed to that gear when you depressed the clutch.
You mean the Wilson Pre-Selector Gearbox. As used on Lodon Bus's and on
some cars, the Daimlers come to mind, Rileys too I think.
Malcolm.
|
1179.354 | | LEMAN::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @GEO, DTN 821-4150 | Fri Feb 18 1994 12:40 | 12 |
| .352� I can think of a number of times where I know I'm going to want to
.352� change down a gear just as soon as it won't destroy the engine but
.352� having to take a hand off the wheel, double-de-clutch, steer and break
.352� gets a bit much.
Then you want the PDK. Excellent stuff. No clutch pedal, just a gear
lever and/or up/down buttons on the steering wheel and one button for
gearchange. At Le Mans the Porsche 962 PDK drivers, while at full speed
in 6th down the long straight, used to select 1st gear. The PDK only
executed the order when speed allowed (braking from 350+ down to 80kph
for the Mulsanne corner). Shifting up works without lifting right foot
from the throttle ...
|
1179.355 | Yes, that's what I want | ESBS01::WATSON | Arm yourself bomb | Fri Feb 18 1994 13:23 | 3 |
| Now, when's someone going to put one in an R-Type NSX.
Mugen perhapse ?
|
1179.356 | | UFHIS::GVIPOND | tobed@2witha10woke@10witha2 | Fri Feb 18 1994 14:46 | 9 |
|
re - a few,
On the Carrera tiptronic it would sometimes shit up when you didn't
need, eg on a short stretch between 2 bends when you applied power
it would shift up, when you could have stayed in 2nd. It couldn't
see the road ahead. Course it might just be i'm a crappy driver and
I'm prone to over revving ;-)
|
1179.357 | | FUTURS::SAXBY | Is it friday yet? | Fri Feb 18 1994 15:24 | 7 |
|
THe Clio's box is a manual box, it just does away with the need to
declutch when you change. It allows the driver to keep his foot down
hard all the time and just go up or down the box. Seems to work pretty
well judging by the Clio's performance.
Mark
|
1179.358 | be careful ... | UPROAR::WEIGHTM | Act, Don't React | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:58 | 9 |
| >> The alternative a'la Ferrari Mondial where you have a manual box but no
>> (user accesible) clutch has it's problems -especially on Ferrari's
My father-in-law once bought a Citroen CX Estate which had a 'C-Matic'
gearbox, i.e. gear lever but no clutch. Trouble is, he found that 40 years of
driving had sub-consciously 'connected' his left foot to his left arm with the
result that he'd drive off smoothly in first and then come to a screeching
halt when changing up to 2nd !
|
1179.359 | | NEWOA::BAILEY | R = S | Tue May 31 1994 13:41 | 21 |
|
Any idea what could be the problem with my 19V (its going into the
garage this Thusday for a check out.. but this garage seems to need
all the help they can get)
About a month ago my car suddenly started to make lots of road
noise.. at all speeds.. BUT! only when going straight ahead or
turning right
eg: If I'am doing 30-40 straight ahead or turning right it sounds
as if I have a flat tire.. but (if possible) turning the steering
wheel only a degree or so left of ahead gets rid of the noise completly!!
ideas ? suggestions ?? (other that just keep left!)
ta
Peb
|
1179.360 | | BERN01::GOODEJ | Mr Dragon | Tue May 31 1994 13:51 | 7 |
|
Not a clue mate, but I'll tell you something......why not try racing
it on an Indy 1 mile oval. You'll have no problems with the noise then!
8-)
JBG
|
1179.361 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Tue May 31 1994 13:54 | 6 |
| 19V - Is this the official abbreviation for a 19 16v ? :-)
The obvious thing I guess is the tracking. Does the car pull to one
side ? Is there any indication of uneven tyre wear ?
Royston
|
1179.362 | Re.359 and .361 | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Tue May 31 1994 13:58 | 5 |
|
I was going to ask about the Valve configuration for a four cylinder 19v
engine.
Malcolm. 8^)
|
1179.363 | Q on towing a caravan. | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Wed Jun 01 1994 11:11 | 20 |
| Hi,
I'm thinking of fitting a tow bar for my 19 16V to tow a caravan. I've looked
at the towing weights in the back of the manual and I am confused that the
maximum braked towing weight for the 19 16V is 900Kg, but for the lighter
1.4 19, it is 1000Kg.
The caravan I am thinking of towing is 930Kg laden, and I would like to know
if it is safe to tow!
Also, the price Herds of Basingstoke quote for a tow bar is about �230 for a
single electric tow bar.
Is a single electric tow bar adequate, or would I need better?
Where else can I get a tow bar?
Cheers.
Mark.
|
1179.364 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Wed Jun 01 1994 11:23 | 10 |
| Mark,
Check out yellow pages. You should be able to get a 'universal' tow
bar with single electrics fitted for under �100. Double electrics
just allows for a fog light and reversing light so its not
worth the extra IMO.
I think you need permission from the lease company first.
Royston
|
1179.365 | shake it | ESSB::SGREEN | | Wed Jun 01 1994 12:43 | 10 |
| <<< Note 1179.359 by NEWOA::BAILEY "R = S" >>>
>> ideas ? suggestions ?? (other that just keep left!)
Front left wheel bearing ??? Grab the wheel by the tyre and try and
shake it - if you feel some play (i.e the wheel moves and the car
doesn't) you've got a problem, if it comes off in your hand you've got
a bigger problem.
|
1179.366 | Caravans... | BERN01::GOODEJ | Mr Dragon | Wed Jun 01 1994 13:46 | 23 |
|
Re .363
Mark,
as far a saftey goes, ie. stability, stopping etc, you need to look
for a caravan whose all-up weight is no more than 80% of your car's
kerb weight. The only sure way to find out the caravan weight it to
weigh it. The manufactures sales brochures are not always accurate and
as soon as you start loading it up with crockery, blankets etc, the
weight flys up.
As far as towbars are concerned, I can recommend Witter who make
units for most models. You may want to consider a stabliser if your
going to be doing a lot of motorway driving with the van on the back,
in which case I can recommend Staymo(u)nt.
We've been towing now for 10 years. Before we left the UK we used
to get a monthly mag called Caravan Life. Definitely the best of the
bunch. Any caravan mag will give you some idea on where to get a towbar
fitted.
Wouldn't it be nice to have a Caravaning (& Camping) Notesfile?
JBG
|
1179.367 | They still in business? | ARRODS::BARROND | Snoopy Vs the Red_Barron | Wed Jun 01 1994 17:15 | 10 |
| re.359
>Any idea what could be the problem with my 19V (its going into the
>garage this Thursday for a check out.. but this garage seems to need
>all the help they can get)
If I were you I'd try another garage. R U expecting a discount from the
garage for your diagnosis?
Dave
|
1179.368 | How about the CV joints. | PAKORA::AGIBSON | Alan Gibson | Wed Jun 01 1994 18:56 | 7 |
|
How about your CV joints. These can make quite alarming noises before
they finally give up the ghost.
Al.
|
1179.369 | caravan_uk notesfile location | KERNEL::PETTET | Norm Pettet CSC Basingstoke | Thu Jun 02 1994 08:39 | 13 |
| ref .366,
There is a caravans notesfile in the UK, checkout:-
Entry name: CARAVANS_UK
File: TRUCKS::DISK$USER72:[NOTES$LIBRARY]CARAVANS_UK.NOTE;1
Moderator: LARVAE::SMART_A
Access is not restricted
Keyword creation is restricted
Notes may be written
Norm
|
1179.370 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Children need to learn about X in school | Thu Jun 02 1994 10:06 | 19 |
| I'll check the caravan notes file.
BTW, I just checked the user manual:
For the 19 16V
The Kerb weight is 1135Kg, 85% of this is 964.75Kg
The maximum permissible towing weight (braked) is 900Kg
For the 19 RN 1.8
The Kerb weight is 1045Kg, 85% of this is 888.25Kg
The maximum permissible towing weight (braked) is 1000Kg
Seems really strange!
Mark.
|
1179.371 | Seems like time to talk to Renault! ;^) | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:05 | 0 |
1179.372 | Mmmm....... | NEWOA::CROME_A | | Mon Jun 06 1994 14:46 | 18 |
| re .359
Wheel bearing - almost defintely - I borrowed a r19 16v with exactly
these symptons, and that was the fix.
I take it you've have it fixed by now (just checked the date of your
note)
re .364
Royston,
I thought the second set of electrics was for fridges and caravan power
etc.... ? ? ? ?
Can't remember - it was ages ago I wired up my electrics !
Andy
|
1179.373 | Radio question... | WELSWS::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Mon Sep 19 1994 10:16 | 34 |
| My January 93 R19 16V (Mark II) has the standard Philips 4x6W radio
cassette, the one without RDS and TI (traffic information).
I have been advised by a salesman in a Renault dealer that it's only
one of the Espace models that has RDS and TI. He tried to sound
convincing, but didn't really make it.
Can the RDS/TI radio cassette from an Espace be fitted easily in a R16?
Whilst talking of R16s I've had two problems and one incident recently:
1 The fuel pump died. Apparently they are constant delivery pumps
which are cooled by the fuel they're pumping. If you run low on
fuel there's a risk that it'll suck air if you're a bit vigorous
as you corner, brake and accelerate. This causes the pump to
overheat and in due course the bearings seize. Remedy is to
refuel when the level gets to about 2.5 gallons, not wait for it
to reach the reserve level.
2 The oil pressure sensor went and the gauge started waving up and down
in a most alarming fashion. Luckily the main agent I took it to
could do it almost while I waited.
3 I needed a new tyre after about 32,000 miles. Hertz would _not_
pay for a Goodyear, but insisted on a Dunlop. However Motorway
Tyres were most willing to change two tyres around between rims
and three wheels around between axles.
Someone asked why there are no grab handles on a R19. Apparently many
fleet buyers insist that company cars have sunroofs. Fitting the rails
for the sunroof on a R19 takes out the space behind the trim for the
fixings of the grab handles. So I guess we'll have to open the sunroof
and let the passengers hang onto the slider rails!
|
1179.374 | cat? | ZPAC20::rick | Richard Tan - it's now or never | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:17 | 4 |
| Hi,
Just wondering what the lifespan of the catalytic convertor on
the 16V is? I've done 120,000km and is mine due for a replacement?
|
1179.375 | Cats don't last long, they now discover! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Wed Oct 26 1994 17:13 | 8 |
| From what I am hearing recently, Cats are ineffective:
a) when cold and;
b) when more than some period of time/distance has elapsed.
Regarding b), this period is now thought to be MUCH smaller than was previously
thought - like less than two years.
Malcolm.
|
1179.376 | Renault Rattle Rocketship FCO required | BRUMMY::HATTONM | | Tue Nov 22 1994 10:31 | 35 |
| Hi R19 noters,
All Renault Rattle Rocketship (RRR) (R19 16V) astronauts please be
aware that there is a potential product problem (PP) with your
terestrial vehicule....
PP desc: when applying boost in 5th gear the gear stick may jump
backwards, removing boot from boost the gear stick jumps forwards
(approx 1-2" or 2.5-5cms) Potential large bumps/jolts may also
render drive inoperable ie 5th jumps out of gear....
Fix: NASA (Renault) are aware of the problem and have also informed
NASA techies, but not astronauts !?!?! This is an as needed FCO but if
you suspect you have it the mention it at your next overhaul as most of
the cost is picked up by NASA.
This pilot has now suffered re-entry in cavalier 1.8LS and it ruins
your driving pleasure while awaiting FCO parts.... be warned !!!
My RRR model is a K-plate, Mod 1, Mar-93 model, so I think originals
are O.K. plus later Mod 1's, but check with the NASA techies if not
sure.
Other problems since orbit have been dodgy oil presure gauge (loose elec
conn), loose exaust mounting (welding r'qed!), new cat required as
original holed by foreign object in middle of orbit, lots of oil
topups!! Local techies very good + helpful and no real major problems
since taking command. Only problem is tyres, Pirelli P600 do not suit
this model, in my experience, especially in the wet. Should be
resolved with ??? (original Goodyears if they can get some ??) when I
get it back.....
Regards,
- Not looking forward to a GM car -
|