T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
193.1 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Fri Jun 20 1986 09:01 | 15 |
| ...it all depends.
Wells are anywhere from $6.00/ft to $10/ft., probably. A deep-well
pump (i.e. anything over about 25 feet) plus connecting it plus
a water tank will probably run about $800-$1000. If you can get
by with a shallow well and find a good deal on a second-hand pump
and storage tank, you might get in under $200, I'm not sure. That
would be real lucky - I'd guess at least $500, after all the details
are taken care of.
Septic system? Assuming First, that the land is suitable for a
septic system (was it tested?), probably $1500-$2000. Rough guess.
Steve
|
193.2 | HOPE THIS HELPS | ARMORY::SHATZERJ | | Fri Jun 20 1986 11:39 | 7 |
| Make sure you check the local codes: most towns in the north have
passed new laws requiring a licened engineer to design the septic
system. The well should be up hill and 500' from the septic tank.
The town hall can put in touch with the right people.
Go slowly and get several estimates from local contractors, they
are usually cheaper if you don't rush them.
Let us know the out come and good luck.
|
193.3 | I forgot to mention | ARMORY::SHATZERJ | | Fri Jun 20 1986 11:45 | 3 |
| PS::::: Make sure when you talk with the town hall that
trailers are allowed on your property.
|
193.4 | | BEING::WEISS | Forty-Two | Mon Jun 23 1986 08:50 | 12 |
| Try dir /key=wells. There are a couple of other notes on wells in here.
.1 sounds very low on the estimates. You can only put in a dug well if there
is enough soil over the ledge - something that isn't likely in NH. (It does
happen - we have a dug well). If you have to drill, then it's pot luck. You
may hit water at 200 ft ($1500), if you're real lucky maybe shallower, but very
possibly deeper.
Septic system is also likely to cost more than that, especially if you need any
fill.
Paul
|
193.28 | Care and Feeding of our Septic System | MORGAN::MAJORS | Mike Majors | Mon Jul 28 1986 18:53 | 12 |
| We have 2 working parents and one 4-year old (total of 3 people)in
our household. Our house will be 3 years old in September. We
live in Acton.
QUESTION: How often should I have our septic system pumped? It
has not yet been done and I am thinking about doing it. Based
on a new system, and our family size, how does this affect the
frequency?
I want to do the right thing but, I don't want to spend money
today if I really don't have to.
|
193.29 | Not necessary if well cared for | NUWAVE::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Mon Jul 28 1986 23:17 | 18 |
| You will probably get various answers to your questions depending
on who you talk to. In general, if you take good care of your
septic system, you will never have to pump it out. By good care,
I mean using RID-X (septic bacteria), minimizing water use and
minimizing the amount of solid waste you send into your system.
Biodegradable materials will disappear by bacterial action. However
if you have a disposal and send down coffee grinds, paper towels,
grease and oil, the amount of solid will build up and you will have
to pump it out. Grease and oil clog the holes of the leaching pits
or pipes. Also if you put things into your system that prevents
bacterial action, such as chlorine, disinfectants, paint thinner
or insecticides then the amount of solids will increase.
Most septic companies will recommend pumping every 2-3 years, but
that is not really necessary given a well cared for system.
-al
|
193.30 | Another question | MOSAIC::GALLAGHER | | Tue Jul 29 1986 09:18 | 13 |
|
I have a few questons on this topic also:
First, I know about the "no-no's" such as no paint thinner or petroleum
products down the drain, use white toiler paper only, we do not
have a disposal, and do not dump things into the system that are
generally not good for the environment. But one thing we do do,
and have heard various opinions on is we do dump our laundry wastewater
into the system. Now the detergents we use all claim to be
biodegradeable, and we do not use bleach, and there are only two
of us in a system designed for a three bedroom house. Occassionally
I dump either RID-X or yeast into the toilet. Question is, many
people in the area dump their washwater into a drywell. Should
I consider doing the same?
|
193.31 | HAVE IT PUMPED | MENTOR::HOPEWELL | Mark Hopewell | Tue Jul 29 1986 10:49 | 29 |
| I worked for a company that installed and pumped septic system while
in school, and would like to throw in my 2 cents worth.
The purpose of a septic tank is to hold the solid waste while draining
off the liquid to a leach field or pit. This means that septic systems
have to be pumped out regularly, I don't care how good you take
care of it. We reccommended not using chemicals such as RID-X because
this would break down the solid and it would drain off with the
liquids. If this happens long enough, the leach field/pit would
eventually become plugged. Then your only choice is to use acid
to unplug th field/pit.
As far as garbage disposals and water from the dishwasher or washing
machine, these will all contribute to the wear and tear of the system.
If your washing machine emptys into the system, use liquid soap.
Powder soap may clog the pipes. If you have a garbage disposal your
system should be pumped out more often.
For a family of three I would say have it pumped out every 3 or
4 years. Just remember that having it pumped out at your convience
and during the summer is alot easier and cheaper than devoloping
problems during the winter when it may take a backhoe to dig thru
the frozen ground. When the system is pumped, a good company will
also check to may sure your pipes arenot clogged by flushing a ball
of toliet paper down and watching for it to come out in the tank.
A little preventive maintenance goes along way.
Mark
|
193.32 | Out of curiousity.... | MIRACL::MAKRIANIS | Pinkie | Tue Jul 29 1986 16:27 | 11 |
|
How much (approximately) does it cost to have a septic system pumped??
My husband and I have bought a house that's 25 years old and uses
a septic tank. I'm sure having it pumped is something we should
look into having done since we don't know when (or if) it was done.
Luckily our washing machine is hooked up to empty in a dry-well
and we don't have a dishwasher.
Patty
|
193.33 | BEST INVESTMENT THIS YEAR | EARTH::GRILLO | | Tue Jul 29 1986 23:58 | 4 |
| I JUST HAD MINE DONE FOR $65, BUT I DUG UP THE OPENING MYSELF,
OTHERWISE THEY WOULD HAVE CHARGED MORE.
|
193.34 | Some prices | NUWAVE::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Wed Jul 30 1986 10:24 | 22 |
| Like I said, depends who you talk to...
I am selling my house and the buyer's bank requires a certificate
of septic system (or whatever). A licensed inspector was hired
to check it out. After digging up the opening, he ran 3 faucets
in the house for about 30-40 minutes (or 200 gallons). His final
judgement was that everything was fine and that the system should
not be pumped even though it has never been pumped in 8 years.
He said if the system is designed correctly and it is correctly
cared for then a system should never have to be pumped. In any
case if you are going to pump, the cost is usually based upon
several factors:
Locating & digging: usually first foot free, every other foot
they dig is about $10. Septic system
covers are anywhere from 6" to 8' deep.
Pumping: anywhere from $50-$100 for the first 1000 gallons,
extra per each 100 gallons
Dumping: putting the stuff "somewhere else"
Certificate: $45
-al
|
193.35 | throw it away, but not down the drain. | 11286::OPPELT | | Tue Aug 05 1986 13:14 | 16 |
|
re BIODEGRADEABLE
Many products claim to be biodegradeable, however biodegradeable
is a relative term. Practically everything will EVENTUALLY
biologically break down, even chlorine compounds. It may take
centuries, but it will happen. Many powdered laundry soaps
claim to be biodegradeable. As mentioned previously the grit
in the powder will clog pipes, but more dangerous to your septic
system is the amount of time that the grit takes to really break
down. I have spoken to several septic specialists, both installers
and pumpers, and they all agree that laundry powder residue
is one of the biggest contributors to the breakdown of a septic
system's effectiveness.
Joe O.
|
193.36 | Annually for us.... | ESPN::PENNEY | Every time it rains, it rains... | Mon Aug 11 1986 13:49 | 7 |
| I have mine pumped annually. My family is 5 adults (close enough ;-)
), 1 of which is away at school during the year, but home for the
summer, holidays, breaks, and often weekends. We have a dishwasher,
disposal, & washing machine all dumping into the system, as well as the
usual showers & toilets. For $65 yearly, it's worth it. The house is
about 8 - 10 years old now. I generally have it done in mid-fall, the
rates seem lower then.
|
193.659 | If you don't flush your tank regularly-don't flush at all | GENRAL::RYAN | | Fri Aug 29 1986 14:07 | 21 |
| I recently replaced our gas hot water tank. The reason for the failure
says the installer is that the tank had been rusting for years (its
was the original tank for the 13 year old house). The layers of
rust particles had been plugging the pin holes as indicated by the
traces of rust on the floor near drain. Like an entheusatic new
home owner (we moved in in May), I read all the manuals that was
attached to the water tank and followed the instructions: BEWARE!!!
If the tank works, don't disturb it! The instruction says to flush
it monthly; I did and the flushing dislodged some of the rust and
the pinholes now becomes a gusher!
The installer says that a 5 year warranty tank has a life from 8
to 15 years. If the flushing is done on a quarterly basis, the life
of the tank can be extended. If it has never been done, leave it
alone; it will do more harm than good.
My research found that there are tanks that are guaranteed for five
to ten years. There are a few 8 year warrantied tanks availiable.
My Miser 8 from Sears was on sale and was in the mid range price.
/cal hoe
|
193.660 | | MAY11::WARCHOL | | Fri Aug 29 1986 23:37 | 2 |
| Your lucky in a way. It could have let loose when you were away
and weren't concerned with its operation and maintenance.
|
193.661 | Squishing water between your toes | DSSDEV::REINIG | August G. Reinig | Sat Aug 30 1986 00:13 | 8 |
| Believe me, it is no fun, coming home and hearing the carpet in
the basement go squish, squish. Our water heater died shortly after
we moved into our house. Fortunately, it was still under warranty
so Penny's replaced it free. I had to pick up the new one and install
it myself, but that's pretty easy. (It only took me a day and teflon
tape is wonderful stuff.)
August G. Reinig
|
193.88 | Adding bedroom vs septic size | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Sep 15 1986 11:36 | 11 |
| I'm adding an addition to my house. After I submitted plans to the
building inspector he asked me what I was using the rooms for and I told
him there would be a dining room and a bedroom. He said that since I was
adding a bedroom, I had to get approval from the health department stating
that my septic system is large enough to handle this third bedroom in my
house.
Is it true that adding bedrooms make you use the bathroom more?
I haven't found this to be true in the past.
|
193.89 | Bedroom/bath ratio requirements | DSSDEV::PATT | | Mon Sep 15 1986 12:04 | 15 |
| When I lived in a simple 2-room apartment, I hardly had to use the
bathroom at all. About three years ago, I started living in my
3-bedroom cape alone, and I found that I had to convert one of my
spare bedrooms to a computer room just so I could sleep at night.
Fortunately, I had spare bathroom downstairs, so I didn't suffer
any undue embarrassment, but who knows?
You'll notice that many 4-bedroom homes have individual baths for
some of the bedrooms. I really don't understand the phenomenon
at all.... somehow the extra bedroom serves as a diuretic. So if
I were adding a bedroom in my addition, I wouldn't take any chances.
I hope this helps...
I.P. Nightly
|
193.90 | They're right! | GWEN::PANDA | | Mon Sep 15 1986 12:21 | 11 |
|
If you check the canine notesfile, you'll get better evidence
of this. Dogs kept in a small kennel-box do not
evacuate during the night, except in extreme instances. But
even the best-house-trained fdogs, put in a house big enough,
eventually find *someplace* where you wished you'd thought to
install a bathroom.
So your Health department is right! You DO need a bigger
septic tank to accomodate your extra bedroom.
|
193.91 | Just add an outhouse to the plan | ERLANG::BD | Brian D. Handspicker | Mon Sep 15 1986 12:26 | 14 |
| By adding another bedroom you are increasing the number of people
that could comfortably live in the house. Even if you are planning
on living there alone with your two cats for the next 40 years,
the town wants to ensure that your septic system can handle
the potential load of the house filled to it's new capacity
(just in case you sell the house for example).
So, most communities will expect some kind of verification that
the septic system can handle proposed additions to your house.
If your septic system isn't up to handling the third bedroom,
the town may require you to upgrade your septic before you
can add the extra bedroom.
bd
|
193.92 | You blew it! | BEING::WEISS | Forty-Two | Mon Sep 15 1986 12:44 | 9 |
| If you'd have told him it was a TV room or a guest room, you'd be fine, but
you've put your foot in it now. If your house was built at all recently, then
the septic system should be able to handle it no problem - they are way
overdesigned. Although I'm not sure if the Health Department will agree with
you.
Good luck.
Paul
|
193.93 | | MAGGIE::MCGRATH | | Mon Sep 15 1986 20:35 | 10 |
| Yep, as I recall, they figure two people per bedroom, so if you have a four
bedroom house they figure it's good for 8 people. It's probably never going
to be a problem but the board of health has to use this number.
--ed.
(by the way, I was told by a neighbor that several years ago, a family of
eighteen lived in my house! That's why they have these rules.)
|
193.94 | | PAPPAS::JIM | Jim Pappas | Tue Sep 16 1986 01:05 | 6 |
| RE:-1
>(by the way, I was told by a neighbor that several years ago, a family of
>eighteen lived in my house! That's why they have these rules.)
But Ed, that is only one person/bedroom in your house!
|
193.95 | when is a bedroom not a bedroom? when it's a den! | NAC::SEGER | | Tue Sep 16 1986 13:27 | 12 |
| I was thinking of converting a bedroom to a den and adding another bedroom.
The building inspector told me that I was therefore adding another bedroom
and needed an expanded septic system. However, if I ripped the closet out
of the den, it would indeed no longer be a bedroom and I could claim that
the number of bedrooms hadn't changed.
Sounds like your first step is to find out what your septic system's capacity
is and you MAY be ok. If not, you might consider changing your plans to add
another room that ISN'T a bedroom. What you then do with the room after it's
added is your business.
-mark
|
193.104 | Septic System & Laundry | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Mon Oct 20 1986 09:08 | 17 |
| The builder of my house did some strang things...like, the drain
pipe (no sink) for the washing machine is six (6) feet high.
My concern is around the draining of washer water - the six foot
height is not an issue; however, our house has a septic system.
Now, being a good ole down home city type, I am completely at sea
with septic systems.
Major concern - will the lint normally coming out of washer water
have any long term impact on the septic system ? Clogging, etc.?
In trying to filter the water, I am experiencing backwash all over
the basement floor. Can anyone recommend a good method to filter
the water; we're currently using old nylons (that will end in the
next day or two - insufficient throughput, causing the backwash).
Dwight
|
193.105 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Mon Oct 20 1986 09:59 | 16 |
|
Are you sure that grey water from the washing machine goes to the septic
tank? It shouldn't -- normally there is a separate drain. The overflow
from the septic system and the washing machine water should both go to
a leachfield or dry well but washing machine water should not go through
the septic system.
If there is a separate drain, you could try running a plumber's snake
down through it. You haven't by any chance taped the washing machine
outlet and the drain together, have you? That can case problems as
the outlet is supposed to sit loosely in the drain so that it can act
as its own vent.
JP
|
193.106 | most don't... | STAR::FARNHAM | Stu Farnham, VMS | Mon Oct 20 1986 10:10 | 6 |
|
re: .1
WHile it's certainly better for laundry drains to bypass the septic
system, it is not at all common practice for builders to construct
homes that way.
|
193.107 | septic tanks | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Oct 20 1986 10:26 | 2 |
| I think most washing machine outlets do not bypass the septic tank.
|
193.108 | Get Washer Water Out! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Mon Oct 20 1986 10:35 | 17 |
| Most states require that everything drain into the septic tank at
the time of construction approval. On the other hand, after everyone
leaves and your now living in the house many people have repiped
the graywater into a separate drywell thus taking some of the load
off of the leach field. My recommendation is that you install a
set/laundry tub next to your washer and discharge the washer into
the set tub. This should solve your backwash problem. Of course
this can only be accomplished it you can know drain your set tub
into something such as any cellar drains, foundation perimeter drains,
etc., If your house doesn't have a drain access lower than thke
bottom of the set tub I'd suggest you install a drywell or even
just discharge the washer out into some low spot in your back yard.
However you discharge the water from your washer, you should get
it out of your septic tank. A load of wash will discharge between
50 to 65 gallons of water, which when dumped into your septic tank
causes all kinds of problems later on in the future.
|
193.109 | "washer ring" | MSEE::SYLVAIN | | Mon Oct 20 1986 14:50 | 14 |
|
Since my leach field was being abused by my wife with the laundry
I just installed what they call a "washer ring" just for the grey
water. It's a cement ring with holes around it, dimension are
about 4 1/2 ft high and about the same in diameter. I had the hole
large enough for this ring along with a load of crush rock.
From what I understand this may illegal in some state.
This outlet going to the leach field should be only 2 1/2
so that nobody connect a toilet to it (in case off new owner).
The cost for this ring was $75.00 and so far it prove worthwhile
and is a relief to the septic system.
|
193.110 | how about maintanance | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Oct 21 1986 09:48 | 21 |
| This could be another note, but since it's related...
How often should one get a septic system pumped? I was told every 5
years and have done so. All my gray water goes into it and I have never
had a hint of a problem (I see that bolt of lightening stike even as I
type).
I know there are a lot of people who feel that if a septic system is
functioning properly (possible means no gray water) that it NEVER needs
to be pumped.
I've also wondered about garbage disposals. I was told I could never
have one. A neighbor of mine has one and simply gets their system
pumped every few years. On the other hand another neighbor put one in
and his leach field died (unclear if it's related).
SO... I'm not sure if this answers anything or not, and I know there
are lots of opinions about septic system mainenance, so should we put
them in here or a separate not?
-mark
|
193.111 | | LATOUR::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Tue Oct 21 1986 10:11 | 2 |
|
re .6 - see also note 270.*, and keyword SEWAGE
|
193.112 | NO chemicals = happy septic system | DRUID::CHACE | | Tue Oct 21 1986 10:26 | 25 |
| Septic systems by definition have to pumped every so often. In
a septic system there is a tank for solids (where they are supposed
to stay) and a leaching field for liquids. Though bacteria does
slowly break down the solids, eventually the tank will become full
and will need to be pumped. How often that will be depends on how
much goes into the system, how large the system is, and what goes into
it (ANY kind of chemical is tough on the bacteria). The tank has
an inlet from the house that is near the top, and an outlet that
is just slightly below the inlet. Thus if you look into the tank
it will always appear almost full. But it is only the solids that
really matter to the tank. If the tank is allowed to fill up with
solids, they will start going out into the leaching field. If this
happens, the leaching field will get plugged up and the system will
not be able to drain off the liquids.
In the last house that I owned we had a disposall and a septic
system. We had the system pumped every 4 years and never had a problem
with the system backing up. This was for a family of 4 with the
washing machine connected to a seperate system. The house I'm in
now also has a disposall and a septic system. I haven't had and
don't expect to have any problem. The only thing that has to be
done is not to abuse the system by putting everything down the
disposall. Most of our garbage goes into the trash, only small amounts
from dishes ect. goes into the dispoall.
Kenny
|
193.116 | ARE SEPTIC ODORS NORMAL?? | DSTAR::SMICK | Van Smick | Wed Jan 07 1987 09:33 | 27 |
| I have a question on septic systems and odors!
BACKGROUND
Our house is 2 years old, with a septic tank and field. There are
two adults in the house, with the usual (??) amount of waste. The
clothes washer does empty into the septic system.
QUESTION
Is it normal for the odors from the stand pipe (on roof) to be very
noticeable on the ground below?
I first noticed the odor when I built the porch roof -- but I was
standing within 4 feet of the stand pipe so I figured it was normal.
Then I began to notice that I could occasionally smell it while
sitting on the deck if the wind was blowing the wrong way. This
morning I noticed that it was very strong as I left the house.
Any thoughts? Does this mean that the tank is full, or that the
system is not operating correctly?
Thanks
VCS
|
193.117 | I'VE GOT IT TOO!! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Jan 07 1987 12:06 | 6 |
| I too have experienced the same type of odor from the septic systems
that I had on my old house as well as my new one. The new system
is only 4 months old so I doubt that it could be filled up. I tend
to believe that some odor (when the wind is right) would be considered
normal, but I'm by no means an expert on the subject.
|
193.118 | Sewer gas - It's nothing to sniff at! | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Wed Jan 07 1987 12:38 | 9 |
| That's just what the vent pipe is for - to release the gas produced
by the decomposing waste, someplace other than in your house. Everyone
gets a whiff now and then, when the wind is right (or wrong).
On cold, still mornings, stratification occurs in the air within
tens of feet off the ground. You can sometimes see these local
inversions as they concentrate chimney smoke near the ground instead
of letting it float away. It wouldn't be a big surprise if the same
thing was happening with the sewer gas.
|
193.119 | 2 possible solutions | WISDOM::NIGZUS | | Wed Jan 07 1987 14:23 | 18 |
| Van,
Your problem is not uncommon at all; the same air drafts that cause
wood smoke to fill the air around the house do likewise to the stack.
I have 2 suggestions and recommend the easier one first.
1) Drill a 1/4 inch whole in the stack (vent pipe) somewhere within
4 or 5 inches of the base. This causes the stack to act somewhat
like an organ pipe and creates a stronger upward blast of sewer
gas. (Think of it as a flute if you like.)
2) Extend the stack by adding another few feet to it. This can
be accomplished by either coupling another piece to the pipe
or trimming the pipe back and adding one, new longer piece.
Good luck.
Steve
|
193.120 | Guess I've got company! | KANE::PAHIGIAN | | Thu Jan 08 1987 21:52 | 41 |
| Well, I feel better after reading this note. My system is brand new (less than
half a year). Everything was fine until we got two days' worth of monsoon about
a month ago, and then I started noticing a smell when the weather got cold
again. So add me to the list.
My imagination got going and I came up with these possible causes:
First, since my system is a shallow system (leach bed is about a foot below the
surface), is it possible that the monsoon dropped anough water on the
previously-frozen ground to fill the system? If the ground is frozen, that much
water can't go down, can it? Was the leach bed leaching the rainwater into the
septic tank instead of leaching the septic-tank output into the ground?
Second, my house is just barely high enough off the ground for me to get an
adequate pitch on the feed line to the septic tank. If rainwater has overloaded
the system, then what's gonna back up first? The solids, right? If those solids
back up to the stack and plug it, that could cause a smell, couldn't it?
Third, the house is not on a slab... it's on 4-foot posts. The feed line to the
tank lies on the ground under the house (there's a skirt under the house so it
doesn't get all that cold under there). Someone suggested to me that a frost
heave may have occurred and disturbed one of the pipe joints or actually
cracked a pipe, causing raw sewage to get dumped onto the ground below the
house. I find this to be even more of a long shot than the other two.
Some other pertinent info: the main source of the smell comes from the BASE of
the toilet, i.e. around the perimeter. I assume since the toilet is not leaking
onto the bathroom floor that the wax seal is intact. I do get a significant
odor outside, however, as you other folks have already mentioned; I just don't
know if it's coming from the stack. Also, the system has an easy time of it;
it's a 1K gallon tank with a 10' x 40' bed, and it's just me at the house. I do
maybe two loads of laundry a week with Liquid detergent and Borateem thoroughly
dissolved in HOT water, I have no garbage disposal, and I throw nothing down
any of the sinks. I also do the yeast trick at the start of every month. And
the system is always fast, i.e. I've never had a "slow drain".
Think the cold weather has gotten to the system?
- craig
|
193.121 | .02 cents worth | RSTS32::BROWN | | Fri Jan 09 1987 08:47 | 9 |
| Is it possible....
1. your leach field is not level and is "bubbling" up in a
shallow area.
2. Do you have a normally high water table in your area.
Canuck
|
193.122 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Fri Jan 09 1987 08:57 | 21 |
|
re .4
Sewer gas odors are OK outside the house - inside they are totally
unacceptable!
From your statement that "the main source of the smell comes from
the BASE of the toilet", I infer that you are getting a sewer gas
odor inside the house - do something about it immediately. The wax
gasket does not have to be particularly well sealed to prevent water
leakage, but an improper seal would let sewer gas back into the
bathroom. I would also check for proper sealing of all the joints
on the waste pipe under the toilet (by the way, don't smoke while
you're doing this).
As far as the septic system is concerned, I can't imagine an acceptable
design that puts the leach field at or above the frost level, which
would cause leaching problems in the middle of the winter. Also,
are you absolutely sure that the main waste pipe is lying on the
ground? (The skirt doesn't do much to prevent freeze-ups, unless
you're pumping heat under the house.)
|
193.123 | | KANE::PAHIGIAN | | Fri Jan 09 1987 11:20 | 27 |
| The water table at my place is 4'. The designer of the system did his
percolation test, checked all the applicable laws, and came up with what I've
got now. The problem with my particular location is that I'm right across the
street from Massabesic Lake, the Manchester water reservoir. I think the idea
was to keep the leach bed high enough off the aquifer below it so that some
filtration would occur between the leach bed and what eventually winds up in
the lake.
The point about not designing a leach bed that would freeze is well-taken,
however, what about the folks who are forced to install a raised bed with a
pump in a buried substation? Those installations are not uncommon. Wouldn't
those raised beds be just as likely to freeze, if not more so, than mine?
I just can't believe that these shallow systems stop working in winter, yet I
can't surmise why they WOULDN'T stop working.
This may all be noise if my problem is the wax seal. I had no idea you could
have a gas problem without a water problem. I appreciate that tip, and I'm
going to pursue it.
In the meantime, I'm going to ask the engineer and the installer of my system
what their thoughts are on leach-bed freezing. Should be interesting...
Thanks,
- craig
|
193.124 | I'd check the wax seal... | COBRA::DUTHIE | | Mon Jan 12 1987 13:17 | 28 |
| The standard leach bed is built by digging down two feet, putting
in 6 inches of crushed stone, laying in 4 inch perforated pipe,covering
with 6 more inches of crushed stone, then straw or untreated building
paper, then one foot of dirt/topsoil. This puts it well above the
normal frost line in New England. The reason it doesn't freeze
is that the gasses given off in the septic tank are warm, and will
warm the entire system. The bottom of the system must be at least
4 feet above the highest ground water height. This means that if
the ground water is less than six feet down you will have to raise
the system up higher. (This is for New Hampshire, I believe that
the regulations for Mass. are similar)
I am living in a mobile home next to the house I am building,
and the pipe from the mobile home to the septic tank is lying on
top of the ground, and has never frozen (this is our third winter
with this set-up).
So, none of your septic system should ever freeze. Standing water,
on the other hand, can saturate your leach field, causing it to
back up somewhat. This, however, should still not increase any
odor in a properly functioning system, unless it remains saturated
(with water above ground level) for a period of time.
Your problem does, indeed, sound like the wax ring under the toilet
is not sealing. If you hold a funnel above a jar and pour water
through it, all the water will go into the jar, and the air in the
jar will leak out between the top of the jar and the bottom of the
funnel. Your toilet probably won't leak water even with no wax
seal, but the sewer gasses will sure leak out.
Jim D.
|
193.125 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Tue Jan 13 1987 08:37 | 1 |
| How deep is the frost line in northern Mass./southern N.H.?
|
193.126 | never freeze? | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Jan 13 1987 08:42 | 14 |
| I have to take exception with .-2's comment about septic systems never
freezeing. My neigbor has his waste pipe go through the garage on its
way to the tank. A couple of years ago the pipe froze and he was up the
creek (and you know which one I mean).
The plumber told him he'd never seen a waste pipe go through an unheated
garage before and recommended that the pipe be wrapped in that heating
tape (forget what it's called).
This is in Mass. I can't recall how cold it got and I'm sure in most
cases that don't freeze, but all it takes is that toilet overflowing
when you least expect it.
-mark
|
193.127 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Jan 13 1987 09:07 | 5 |
| Rule of thumb in this area is that frost line is down about 4 feet. Of course
the frost will only go down that deep once in a blue moon, but that's all it
takes.
Paul
|
193.128 | What's Code? | ENGINE::MAY | | Tue Jan 13 1987 14:32 | 8 |
| My line from the house to the Septic Tank is under 18" of gravel.
It hasen't frozen yet, during the last 11 years. Even the year the
frost went down 5', not problem. I'm sure about the five foot frost,
as a neighbor of mine and I had to thaw his tubing from his well
to the house.
dana
|
193.129 | Unusual to Freeze | HANDEL::KENNEDY | | Wed Jan 14 1987 08:56 | 10 |
| There is not normally a problem with the pipe freezing because
waste water runs quickly through it to the septic tank. However,
if the tank is backing up and water starts to stand in the pipe
it will freeze and break the pipe. The moral is to keep the septic
tank from overflowing.
From experience if it break this time of year you can wait until
thaw ( early April ) or pay $100 an hour for equipment to break
through the frozen like concrete ground.
jak
|
193.130 | another possible cause of odors | KANE::PAHIGIAN | | Mon Jan 19 1987 18:36 | 12 |
|
From this Sunday's Boston Globe:
Q: Our plumbing vent on the roof freezes shut in very cold winter
weather and we smell a septic odor in the house. What's the solution?
A: The permanent solution is to replace the vent, which is too small
in diameter, with a 3-inch or 4-inch pipe. Unfortunately, that
involves roof work to replace the flashing. Since the closure is
caused by condensation freezing and gradually closing the vent, you
can experiment by insulating the vent in the attic to keep the moist
air warmer longer.
|
193.131 | Health Hazard | HERMES::AREY | Proofreader for a Skywriting Company | Wed Jan 21 1987 22:48 | 13 |
| I directed a Youth camp for a couple years and one year we had
a problem with the leach bed being over full. [must have been that
good ol' camp food! ;-)] But there was a remarkable increase in
infected wounds that week! Had a blister on my hand myself that
just got real infected!
So.. if'n you ken *smell* it, there are probably airborne microbes
around with the fumes, and you'd tend to get unhealthy!
Not to alarm anyone. Our problem that year was flagrant! [Fragrant?]
But it's a good motivation to fix the problem!
Don Arey
|
193.132 | | ALIEN::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Thu Jan 29 1987 11:55 | 3 |
| re .14, I wonder if some heattape around the vent pipe just below
(or above, whichever is accessible) the exit would suffice as a
fix, at least temporarily until weather more suitable for roof work?
|
193.143 | Septic questions | 18889::CURTIS | | Thu Feb 26 1987 10:10 | 10 |
| We're in the process of buying a house with a private sewer system
(septic, I think). Being from the west where such things don't exist,
I've got a few questions. First, what should I look out for to
make sure that this sewer system is OK? Are there any inherent
difficulties in hooking up a dishwasher and garbage disposer to
such a system? Anything else that I should be aware of?
Thanks,
Steve
|
193.144 | From experience... | CLUSTA::ASCHNEIDER | Andy Schneider - DTN 381-2475 | Thu Feb 26 1987 10:23 | 25 |
| Probably the most important thing to remember about a septic
system is that what you pump into it has to go somewhere. In
general, there is a continuious process of "digestion" within
the septic tank - or turning solid waste into liquid waste. This
liquid waste is then passed out of the septic tank into a leach
field, where it is absorbed into the ground over a large square-foot
area. You'll hear people saying to put yeast into your toilet once
a month or so - this is to enhance the digestion process in the
tank, to insure it doesn't get blocked or full or anything like
that. The more water you pump into the system, the more water that
will be spread into the leach field - a properly installed leach
field should cause you no problems with normal household use, which
includes a washer and a dishwasher.
One thing to worry about with a garbage disposal and a septic system
is that what goes into it could screw up the above mentioned septic
process. some folks have been known to put EVERYTHING down the
disposal, and then have septic trouble later. PUting a lot of greasy
things down the disposal isn't too good for it, as is also true
of bones, etc - they just settle to the bottom of the tank. As
long as you're only putting limited and digestable things down
the disposal, you shouldn't have much trouble.
andy
|
193.145 | Dishwasher OK, disposal NG? | JOET::JOET | Deatht�ngue lives! | Thu Feb 26 1987 10:25 | 9 |
| Somewhere in here is a lovely description of exactly how septic
systems work (I remember, because I accidentally destroyed this
conference and the note was graciously re-entered by the author).
Dishwashers should pose no problem (basically it's just more water),
but I'd be hesitant to add a garbage disposal. It's the solids
that really cause you problems.
-joet
|
193.146 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Thu Feb 26 1987 11:27 | 7 |
| Try DIRECTORY/KEY=SEWAGE for other pertintnt notes.
More septic system no-no's:
o no harsh chemicals (kill bacteria)
o no dyed paper products (ie, white toilet paper only)
|
193.147 | Disposal - Code restriction? | 18889::ROGUSKA | | Thu Feb 26 1987 11:32 | 10 |
| I have been told that in the town I live in that it is against
code to have a garbage disposal if you have a septic tank. When
we bought the house two years ago we needed a plumber to do some
repairs and requested that he install a disposal at the same time.
He would not install the disposal because it was against code.
Of course it is highly unlikely the inspector would find.
This is Ashland, MA. (I've never called the inspector to verify
this so it all second hand)
|
193.148 | Water Softener with Septic? | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Thu Feb 26 1987 11:38 | 7 |
| I too have a septic... Does anyone know what the impact a water
softener has on it's operation??? The softener has a 'regenerating'
cycle that periodically renews the operation of the softener.
Softeners use SALT to do this. Does this salt harm the tank
operation??? Should I have any problems?
M
|
193.149 | some laundry soaps are not good | HARPO::B_HENRY | Bill Henry | Thu Feb 26 1987 11:55 | 8 |
| I don't know about softener but I do know that certian laundry
detergents don't do well in septic systems. I know of more
than one person who had problems with the tank overflowing due
to solid buildup only to have the problem go away by switching
laudry soap. If memory dosnt fail me too much, powder seems to
work better than liquids. Also, people who do thier own
photographic developing at home and pour the used chemical down the
drain have been know to have bad septic problems.
|
193.150 | | 38082::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Thu Feb 26 1987 12:15 | 7 |
| I have been running a garbage disposal, washer machine and dish
washer thru my system for eight years without regard for what goes
into my system. I have never had a problem and get myself pumped
out about once every 3 years. As far as garbage disposals go, if
it is working properly then only small pieces of anything should
ever go down the drain. The toilet will produce much more solid
waste than a disposal.
|
193.151 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Thu Feb 26 1987 12:28 | 8 |
| re .7:
Yes, the more often you think to pump out the septic tank, the more
forgiving the system will be (except for grease).
And the socially acceptable definition of edibility dictates that a
much higher percentage of what goes down the toilet is short-term
biodegradable, than what goes down the garbage disposal.
|
193.152 | | HAZEL::THOMAS | No <ESC> from reality | Thu Feb 26 1987 12:31 | 7 |
| If you have it pumped on a regular basis you should have no problem.
This is important because it's the only way to remove the
non-digestible solids that build up. Eventually they get into the
leaching bed and plug it up. I've been told all septic systems should
be pumped every 2 to 5 years depending on usage. Don't wait until
it backs up, the damage is done by then and can cost several thousand
to fix.
|
193.153 | | ALIEN::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Thu Feb 26 1987 12:37 | 26 |
| re .7 - a toilet might produce much more solid waste than a garbage
disposal but since the waste is pre-digested it should be a different
consistency and thus might have a different effect on the performance
of the septic system.
I think the issue with the garbage disposal involves two factors, one
(already mentioned) is selection of what you put down it - for example,
I do not put eggshells down ours because our water is fairly alkaline
and I'm not sure how well the calcium carbonate will dissolve (if it
didn't, we'd be creating limestone deposits which I'm not sure would
not be good for the leach field), and bone would probably be similar.
The other issue would simply be volume of solids, contrary to .7
I think that toilet waste is largely water while scraps and leftovers
might not be as much water. The thing is how the solid volume relates
to the field size.
Also, I think another discussion in this conference asserted that
washing machines are not good for leach fields, the lint isn't digested
very well if at all, and there's a large volume of water involved.
Finally, the recommendation about pouring yeast down the system
is easy to follow if you get bottle-conditioned beer :-)
or another alternative is products on the market to supply and
encourage the desirable bacteria. I find that using the leftover
yeast from my homebrewing is more fun though :-) :-) :-)
|
193.154 | water softeners vs. septic systems | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Thu Feb 26 1987 12:54 | 14 |
| re: water softeners vs. septic systems
I have a brochure from the "Water Quality Association," or something
like that, that says that the amount of salt associated with
regenerating softeners does slow down the bacteria for a short while,
but it recovers nicely. They are an association for water conditioning
equipment dealers, so I'm sure they're a little biased.
I've been using a softener for about 1 1/2 years, and a recent check
of my septic tank (required for a refinancing) indicated that it
looked fine.
__Rich
|
193.155 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Feb 26 1987 13:27 | 9 |
| Grease is a no-no; also colored toilet paper. Detergents aren't
great either, but probably ok in home quantities. Watch out for
chemicals (cleaners, etc.). Washing machines can be a problem if
the amount of water exceeds the capacity of the leach field (the
water comes in faster than it can drain out) but if you have a
properly-designed system you'll be okay. Better to put the drainwater
from the washing machine into a separate dry well, but hardly anybody
does it.
Get the tank pumped every few years.
|
193.156 | colored paper in the septic tank | MAPLE::BATES | | Thu Feb 26 1987 15:26 | 8 |
| What type of problem does colored paper cause versus white paper?
Also, I always thought that liquid detergent was better for your
septic tank than powder. Is that true or have I been using the
wrong soap?
steve
|
193.157 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Feb 26 1987 16:11 | 4 |
| Colored paper doesn't break up and decompose very well, according
to reports. Apparently the dyes act as a preservative or something.
Oh yeah - so-called "flushable" tampons aren't a good idea either.
|
193.158 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Feb 26 1987 16:14 | 3 |
| Lest all this doom and gloom deter you from buying a house with
a septic system - don't let it frighten you off. In general they
are quite trouble-free unless you abuse them severely.
|
193.159 | Grease Relief? | ULTRA::ZURKO | Security is not pretty | Fri Feb 27 1987 10:09 | 4 |
| Someone said pumping will take care of all of these problems, except
for grease. Anyone know what grease will do to a septic system,
and how to get rid of that "greasey buildup", if it does occur?
Mez
|
193.160 | No real relief for grease here | CLUSTA::ASCHNEIDER | Andy Schneider - DTN 381-2475 | Fri Feb 27 1987 10:19 | 18 |
| Basically, Grease sits at the top of the tank all of the time,
and when it flows into the leach field, it doesn't absorb into
the ground under the leach field - it literally coats the ground
and can prevent absorption over a long period of time. If you've
got a lot of grease in your tank, and you have it pumped, a lot
of the grease sticks to the side of the tank, and when the tank
fills up again, the grease comes off of the walls of the tank
and at the same state it was before.
In general, I wouldn't worry about it unless someone had been dumping
an incredible amount down the system. if the system is working
ok now, and the tank hasn't been pumped recently, then you can
fairly safely assume that grease isn't a bad problem - just make
sure you're careful once you start using the system to keep
grease in mind.
andy
|
193.466 | unclog drain w/ septic system | SQM::RICO | | Fri Feb 27 1987 12:14 | 5 |
|
What can I use to unclog a drain that is safe for my septic system?
Thanx,
Rico
|
193.161 | RE: .13 | HAZEL::THOMAS | No <ESC> from reality | Fri Feb 27 1987 12:31 | 9 |
| RE: .13
Powdered laundry detergents should be avoided because they usually
contain 'fillers' which do nothing but add volume and settle to
the bottom of the septic tanks. There are some powders without these
fillers and require only a 1/4 cup or so per wash but they aren't
very popular because the cost per pound is much higher even though
the cost per wash is about the same. I don't see that there should
be any problem with liquid detergents.
|
193.162 | | 38082::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Fri Feb 27 1987 12:32 | 9 |
|
Note:
Go on vacation when you get pumped out. Those guys should all
get purple hearts !!
-Steve-
|
193.163 | | EXIT26::CREWS | I like Mandy Winger! | Fri Feb 27 1987 15:14 | 4 |
| Re. .19. Hmmm, ...funny, when the guy pumped out ours last fall,
we didn't smell a thing!
-- B
|
193.467 | a snake.... | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Mon Mar 02 1987 12:11 | 0 |
193.468 | use water pressure to do the work | KANE::PAHIGIAN | | Mon Mar 02 1987 12:15 | 16 |
| I've had the best luck with those short hoses that attach to a faucet. The
"business" end gets shoved down the drain, and when you turn the water on, a
flexible bulb expands against the walls of the drainpipe to hold the hose in
place while the system water pressure forces the blockage (hopefully) out into
the holding tank. I'd try this before using an auger, although the latter may
be a necessity if the first trick doesn't work.
By the way, this method works best if you have decent water pressure. Mine runs
between 40 and 60 psi, but some older pumps develop only 20 to 40.
You might want to make arrangements for catching overflow from other drains
(toilet, washer, stack vent if necessary) if you use this method and you've got
a real bad blockage and you're not sure where it is. You should at least have
an idea, though, and with a mental layout of the system, you should be able to
figure out what needs to be plugged up and what doesn't. Don't forget the
stack!
|
193.164 | Treating grease build up | SCOTCH::GRISE | Tony Grise | Tue Mar 03 1987 08:58 | 10 |
|
The grease build up in a septic tank and leach field can be
chemically treated with acid based chemicals. There are
people who are certified by the state to treat systems. The
acid breaks down the grease so it can be absorbed by the ground.
The chemical reaction also nutralizes the acid so that it
environmentally safe. This is not something to do yourself.
Tony Grise
|
193.165 | | VINO::JMAHON | | Fri Mar 20 1987 09:53 | 4 |
| I got a call from my tenants saying that the septic system is
overflowing out of the cover. However, they say their drains
have not backed up or anything? Any explanations?
|
193.166 | | HARPO::CACCIA | | Fri Mar 20 1987 16:02 | 9 |
|
Sounds like your tank may be full and the outflow to the leech field
is blocked. Depending on how far away the tank is from the house
and how much water is used it will take time for the back up to
actually reach the house.
Get it checked quick.
|
193.167 | | ALIEN::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Fri Mar 27 1987 13:20 | 7 |
| also, depending on the relative levels of the tank cover and the
plumbing drains inside the house, I suspect that it might be possible
for some backup to go unnoticed (if it can run out the tank cover
quickly enough to avoid backing up high enough to affect the drains).
ditto on the advice in #1 - check it out, quick. Either call a
septic service or authorize the tenants to do so, ASAP.
|
193.168 | Where is septic system? | EVER11::LOWELL | | Tue Mar 31 1987 13:07 | 9 |
| I am looking for some hints about locating my septic system. I
have asked the previous owners but they aren't sure where it is.
I know where the leech field is and have a couple of clues about
possible locations but I don't want to start digging up my yard
for nothing. At worst it is located under a concrete slab which
has me a little suspicious since I didn't see any special snow
melt patterns this winter. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thank you,
Ruth
|
193.169 | I found one | CIM::CHAPMAN | Jim Chapman DTN 456-5593 | Tue Mar 31 1987 16:21 | 17 |
| This is how I found mine.
Find the location and the direction the waste line leaves the house.
The septic tank should be in a straight line from this point. Poke
around with a metal rod until you find the tank.
The tank should not be within 5 feet of the house, 5 feet of the
drain field, or 50 feet of your well if you have one. The tank
it will not be smaller than 3' X 5'. So if you find an object
about that size and at the correct depth (somewhat lower than
where the drain line exited the house) it is most likely tank
or a large rock.
The distances depend on the
1. code at the time you house was built
2. if the code was followed
|
193.170 | Board of Health | NUWAVE::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Tue Mar 31 1987 20:39 | 0 |
193.171 | Snake it out | MENTOR::HOPEWELL | Mark Hopewell | Fri Apr 03 1987 09:58 | 14 |
| Another way, although it is messy, is to take the cap off of the
end of the drain pipe where it leaves your cellar. Then you need
to get a snake and run it out till it hits something which should
be your tank. Have someone keep banging the snake against the tank
while you go out and listen for the banging. Using a metal rod in
the ground with your ear next to it works. This will also give you
a good idea how far the tank is from the house.
If all else fails, call a company that cleans out septic tanks.
They should be able to find it using the methods I described.
Good luck
Mark
|
193.172 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Fri Apr 03 1987 10:10 | 6 |
|
Or mark the snake, pull it out, measure, and find the exact distance
from the cleanout entrance to whatever you hit in the tank.
I don't suppose you remember where that first circle of green grass
appeared when the snow melted...the tank is right below it.
|
193.476 | Washing machines and septics systems | BARNUM::CHENETZ | | Thu Apr 09 1987 09:27 | 13 |
| The home I moved into has no hookups for a washer. I spoke to a
friend who told me to be careful if I hook up the washer into
the septic system (it has a 1000 gallon tank) because the large
amount of water flowing and the laundry detergent
may affect the systems operation. The way I figured it, the
soap and extra water would help get rid of the grease and keep
the system cleaner. Does anyone have any thoughts on this or
any alternatives to draining into the septic system. I heard that
some people drain the washer into a dug hole in the ground filled
with gravel (dry well???). Is that a viable alternative or
will it freeze and back-up in the winter months??
Steven
|
193.477 | Some thoughts | BARNUM::JORGENSEN | | Thu Apr 09 1987 10:38 | 17 |
|
Steve,
I use the dry well in my house, but that is because the
washer, which is in the basement, is below the level of the septic
tank and I would need to pump the waste water up to get it into
the septic tank. On the other hand I have seen people drain waste
water into the septic system, detergents and all, without problems.
There are additives, most notably RID-X(available at SPAGS of course),
which are supposed to reactivate the bacteria in the septic tank
to keep it processing waste. If you have a dishwasher, that dumps
soaps into the septic tank, never mind all the soap from a shower
or bath tub. What I'm getting at is... I have never seen a septic
system back up just because of waste soap... more important factors
would be how well the septic system was engineered, and how well
the land perks in your area.
/Kevin
|
193.478 | which soap to use with septic? | MORMPS::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Thu Apr 09 1987 12:15 | 4 |
| I read somewhere that, interms of detergents, soaps (like IVORY SNOW)
etc, there are definitely some choices you should make about what you
use if you want to extend the life of you septic system - anyone have
concrete info on this?
|
193.479 | yes, never put "concrete" in a septic system! | ARCHER::BMDLIB | | Thu Apr 09 1987 12:54 | 8 |
| From what I understand, the best arrangement (the one requiring
the least amount of preventative maintenance) is to have the
toilets go to the septic and EVERYTHING else go a separate system,
like a drywell. Most soaps hurt the bacteria in a septic, bleach
is a real no-no for septics.
At the least, I would have the washer go to a seperate system.
John
|
193.480 | common sense & code | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Thu Apr 09 1987 13:00 | 9 |
| Of course, you may wish to verify that a dry-well is legal in your
town...
Being a big city type, I had the same questions; friends with life-long
experience in these things basically 'pooh-poohed' such concerns,
with a few caveates-
Obviously, don't abuse the system; ie, common sense useage.
Use biodegradable soaps, and liguid laundry detergent.
|
193.481 | dry wells = goodness (if legal in your area) | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Apr 09 1987 13:28 | 13 |
| re:.3
I've always heard if at all possible you should avoid washing machine output
from going into a septic system. I'm in the processing of defining a dry well
for mine. .4 was correct about not all towns allowing them, but in my case
where I'm building next to a wetland and have gotten the DEQE involved, I was
TOLD to put in a drywell for the foundation water and gutters. I asked if I
could also dump my washer into it and they said to go for it.
I think the main place dry wells are forbidden is in areas in which houses are
tightly clustered AND have septic systems.
-mark
|
193.482 | regular maintanance will avoid problems | FSTVAX::OTOOLE | MIKE OTOOLE FSTVAX::OTOOLE 249-1745 | Thu Apr 09 1987 13:43 | 25 |
|
Speaking from experience, soap and etc, from washing machines
will cause the septic system to clog up.
the way a septic system works is natural bacteria break down
top layer of crust and settles to the bottom of the tank.
soaps prevent this and cause major problems !!!
also you should have your septic tank pumped once every 2 years
if you dont have a dry well you should do it every 2 years
religously.
if you dont have a dry well you can get away with 2-4 yrs depending
on family size and house activity (host alot of parties etc.)
I have installed and repaired many a septic and dry well system.
I can gaurentee when they go they always go on thanksgiving
christmas, new years, and most other holidays but they like
to go on the coldest snowest holidays.
|
193.483 | TLC, by all means!! | WHY::WHITE | Willie White | Thu Apr 09 1987 13:55 | 13 |
| I agree that soaps can clog up septic systems. I house I bought
has a badly abused (poorly maintained?) system and after I had it
pumped out once, it still backed up. I uncovered the inlet baffle
of the septic tank and found powdered soap caked up on the baffle
and blocking the end of the pipe from the house.
I'm going to have to replace my leach field this year and I intend
to look into a dry well for the gray water from the washer. I'd
say put one in if you can, otherwise use biodegradable soaps (any-
body suggest good brands?) and treat your system with TLC.
-willie
|
193.484 | ex | ERLANG::SUDAMA | make my day | Thu Apr 09 1987 14:04 | 27 |
| I'd like to extend this discussion further to include cesspools.
I live beside a large pond on which the houses are located in close
proximity. Our house is presumed to have a cesspool, although I
have had people come out to look for it and they could never find
it. I want to install a washer, but I am concerned about overloading
the system, and possibly leakage into the pond. I have been told
by the neighbors that they think the woman who lived in the house
before once had a washer, but had it removed for some unknown reason.
If anyone has any experience with this, I have three questions:
1) Would adding a separate drywell for the washer really help,
considering that the cesspool is presumably already leeching directly
into the ground?
2) Would it help to "buffer" the output from the washer by dumping
it into a tank, and pumping out the tank a little at a time? I thought
this might give help prevent overloading the cesspool by dumping
all of the water at once.
3) The pond itself is owned by the state (MA). Are there any laws other
than town ordinances governing the seepage of waste or pollutants into
such waters?
P.S.: The ground in our area is extremely sandy and absorbant. We
can hardly grow grass because it dries out as soon as you turn the
sprinkler off.
|
193.485 | septic system soap | DEBIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Fri Apr 10 1987 10:19 | 17 |
| There was a discussion of this whole problem in (I think) Better Homes
and Gardens about four years ago. (Sorry I can't give you an exact
reference; the Nashua Public Library has it, though.) It included a
brand-name list of products that were good and bad for septic systems.
The 'good' list didn't include anything that's available on your
average supermarket shelf.
As I recall, their top septic-system-safe soap was Amway. (Unless you
have really serious political/moral objections to putting your money
into the company...)
Do they have such things as County Extension agents here in the
East? Back West that's the first place you go for information on
problems like this.
--bonnie
|
193.486 | Cleaning a Drywell? | MPGS::ROGUSKA | | Fri Apr 10 1987 11:41 | 16 |
| Since the subject of drywells for washers has come up I have
a question. We have our washer draining into a drywell but
about three months a go the draining stopped. (Note this was
when the ground was frozen and the snow on the ground, as
predicted in an earlier reply!)
My guess is that the drywell must be cleaned, or that the drain
pipe into the well is clogged. Okay to check the pipe I snake the
line, but how does one clean out a drywell? How big of a job is
it, once I determine where the $#@@ the drywell is, what exactly
do you do?
Any hints will be appreciated!
Thanks,
Kathy
|
193.487 | extension service | BARNUM::CHENETZ | | Fri Apr 10 1987 14:23 | 5 |
| re. .9 Is that what an extension service is for? There is a
sign on rt. 9 just as you enter Leicester (from Worcester) which
says county extension. Never knew what it meant though.
Steve
|
193.488 | re: .7, Soap Clogging | GNERIC::FARRELL | Thirty Six Bit Paleontologist.. | Fri Apr 10 1987 16:54 | 11 |
| RE: .7
Soap clogging up septic systems. How about city sewer systems? A friend
of mine installed a washer, and it was running fine for 2 months, then
last week, the line started backing up. The drain works fine, untill
the washer is in operation. He's looking at the possibilty of having the
line ripped up, $several$ thousand to repair it, as the city (Worcester)
told him it's his fault, not theirs. 2 Routing companies tried and couldn't
clean the line out.
|
193.489 | your source for information | CREDIT::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Mon Apr 13 1987 09:58 | 42 |
| re: .11 --
It sounds like the thing I was talking about. It's a great source
for anything useful:
- directions for how to plant and care for almost anything you can
plant (ornamental, edible, indoor, outdoor. . . )
- how to raise and care for practically any kind of animal known
to man, including some things you didn't know could be farmed
(ever think about raising rattlesnakes to milk their venom?
neither did I.)
- recipes and other directions for how to prepare and eat almost anything
you can plant or grow
- plans and procedures for most any kind of home repair, addition,
remodeling, building, etc. etc. etc.
- advice on things like water tables, toxic chemicals, erosion, drainage,
planning land development, etc. etc.
Usually the extension service has access to almost everything the
state's university system has ever done. Since all the schools'
research is done on public money, it's available to the public free or
for a nominal charge -- depending on what the university system studies
and how competent the local exension agent is, they should have or be
able to get consumer information (lists of local vets, tree surgeons,
surveyors, etc. etc. etc.), location of soil and water analysis
services and other kinds of lab work, public health information (how to
sterilize baby bottles, how to keep rats out of the house, that kind of
thing), the detailed reports about geological formations or other
engineering or scientific research, complex studies of genetics
and breeding information for most any current or potential species
of livestock.
Whether you want to build a safer hay chute in your barn, upgrade
your flock of Merinos, or raise ornamental catfish in a backyard
pond, the extension office should be able to help.
--bonnie, who went to an 'aggie' school
|
193.490 | not the same problem | WHY::WHITE | Willie White | Mon Apr 13 1987 10:01 | 19 |
| re: .12
The soap clogging problem I had was because my septic tank has a
baffle (metal plate, in this case) mounted about a foot beyond the
end of the pipe comming from the house. The purpose of the baffle
is to prevent solids from just floating accross the top of the septic
tank and out to the leech field (or pit). The solids will eventually
sink to the bottom of the tank and decompose.
In regards to a city sewer system, I don't think there is any kind of
baffle in the line. I suspect that your friend's pipe is partially
clogged and he only notices problems when the washer sends out a lot of
water in a short period of time. If the pipe has clogged because
it has collapsed, he will indeed need a new one.
-willie
|
193.491 | | CADSE::HARDING | | Mon Apr 13 1987 14:24 | 10 |
| re: 10
Most dry wells are basically holes in the ground filled with stone.
If it fails, stopped leatching then the ground around the well
has plugged up, usually with lint and soap residue. They are not
normally designed to be pumped out. The best you can do is to locate
the dry well, dig a trench out from it and fill it with crushed
stone. Giving the water a new area to leatch into.
dave
|
193.528 | Grow above septic? | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Wed Apr 15 1987 14:35 | 13 |
| I have an area, about 8 feet X 5 feet in my yard which refuses to
grow anything upon it. I assume that it is the ground directly about
the septic tank (as during the winter, the snow melts there first)
.
Is there any suggestions for planting or landscaping this area to
cover the bare ground? Ideas have been adding soil, shrubs and mulch,
railroad-ties, etc...
Any ideas?
Mark
|
193.529 | Got a lemon? Make lemonade! | BOOKIE::WIEGLER | | Wed Apr 15 1987 14:52 | 6 |
| It all depends on where the offending area is, put how about building
a deck over the area (maybe 8'x8', or something like that) and
landscaping around the deck with flowering shubs, perennials, etc.?
Decks don't have to be attached to the house. A freestanding deck
can be a real highlight in the yard. Also check into the GARDEN
notes file.
|
193.530 | "Danger! Will Robinson" | JOULE::CONNELL | It's mine! mine! all mine! | Wed Apr 15 1987 15:33 | 10 |
|
> Is there any suggestions for planting or landscaping this area to
> cover the bare ground? Ideas have been adding soil, shrubs and mulch,
> railroad-ties, etc...
No real ideas but a caveat-- If it is indeed your septic tank, don't put any-
thing over it that can't be easily moved. Someday you may want to pump that
sucker out!
--Mike
|
193.531 | Hope this helps | WORDS::MCLAUGHLI | | Wed Apr 15 1987 16:30 | 6 |
| A small landscaping trick!!! Buy a bail of peat moss(prefer
Canadian) personal preference only. mix this with the soil in your
bare spot, rake it out, put in grass seed, over seed this area,
and roll it down. Then use a soaker hose to wet the area.Fertilize
as needed. You will need to soak this area in long dry spells, but
this should do the trick.
|
193.532 | Tried it already... No luck! | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Wed Apr 15 1987 16:36 | 7 |
| re: -.3 Sounded good to me when I tried that last spring/summer/fall.
No way! IT grew for a short while,,,, then died out. COuldn't keep
it going at all.
Anyone else have suggestions?
Mark
|
193.533 | thin soil or gas | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | | Wed Apr 15 1987 20:35 | 14 |
| I would suspect the soil is either a bit thin in the at location
or the tank is leaking methane gas which will kill whatever grows
above it. Same thing that happens when you get a leak in a gas
service line. How deep have you dug down in that area?
I would think you would need at least a foot of dirt over the concrete
to an adequate amount of soil for the root system and to retain
enough water.
My parents had the gas problem in a house they owned and never were
able to get anything to grow there. They ended up stacking the wood
pile there.
good luck, jerry
|
193.534 | | PBSVAX::KILIAN | | Thu Apr 16 1987 12:08 | 3 |
| I always thought the grass was greener over the septic tank! :-)
-- Mike Kilian
|
193.535 | Don't forget where you hid the septic system! | AKOV04::KALINOWSKI | | Thu Apr 16 1987 13:56 | 7 |
| re .5 my neighbor did this too, only he forgot the system was under
there after a while. one rainy day last year he tried to move the pile.
but all the weight made his pick truck tires spin. He kept revving
that truck up until there was this TERRIBLE smell. Seemed he hit
the drainage bed. It took two trucks to pull him out after he got
the wood off the truck. And the street smelled "real nice" for 2
days".
|
193.536 | I agree with .6 | CHAPLN::ROSENTHAL | Out to break Murphy's Law! | Thu Apr 16 1987 15:27 | 12 |
|
re: .6
I agree! In the house we just moved from, we had nothing (well,
almost nothing) for grass in the backyard. The house was new &
the lawn never really "took"...
...except over the septic tank. The grass there was SO thick
and SO green, that it stuck out like a sore thumb.
Donna
|
193.537 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | | Thu Apr 16 1987 22:09 | 7 |
| The leach field makes for green grass too. I always thought it was
greener there to(or so erma whatshername would have us belive).
So the neighbor stirred up a stink eh? 8^)
-j
|
193.538 | How sweet it is... | MPGS::THOMANN | | Fri Apr 17 1987 15:07 | 6 |
| I have a small raised bed veggie garden (came with the house) over
the leach field. Haven't put a drop of fertilizer in 3 years there.
Stray zucchini have stalled my mower many a time. Try a raised bed
flower/veggie garden. Might be another idea...
Jim
|
193.173 | Moving leaching field | FDCV17::XXTEST5 | Dave Cohen 251-1152 | Wed Apr 22 1987 17:50 | 9 |
| I'm having a problem with the septic system now that my kids are
back home from school. The leaching field is overflowing.
- What is involved in moving/adding to a leaching field?
I have plenty of land.
- What does it cost?
- Does anyone know of contractors in SE Mass?
|
193.174 | Slow leach? | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Tue May 05 1987 10:40 | 19 |
| My question is similar to .30
I'm buying a house and the bank requires a septic certificate.
The house is 6-7 years old. I went with a complete "pump dry and
inspect" certificate yesterday. The guy says the leach pit is very
slow to non-operational. I've got a week til we schedule closing.
What can I do? Does anyone know about leach pits, as opposed to
leach fields? I'm thinking that the next step is to have a talk
with the city health inspector.
Everything else about the house is only a minor problem. Owner
says she's never had a problem in 2 1/2 years.
Any wisdom would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
Elaine.
The city is Gardner, Mass.
|
193.492 | Replacing leach field? | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Thu May 07 1987 19:33 | 14 |
| re: .7
Willie, could you explain your situation with the leach field?
I'm buying a home with a "very slow" leach field. That's a euphemism
for "non-operational". I'm surprised because the house is only
6-7 years old. But, as you said, it has been abused. How old is
your system? Have you gotten any estimates for replacing the field
yet?
Perhaps others will want to know, too.
Thanks.
Elaine
|
193.493 | | WHICH::WHITE | Willie White | Fri May 08 1987 09:46 | 29 |
| re .16
My house is about 14 years old and uses a leach pit instead of a
leach field. The pit is like the concrete tank except it is open
at the bottom and has holes in the side. From last summer through
November, I had my septic tank pumped out four times and the pit
pumped once. The system has been 'working' since then although
a little on the slow side.
I haven't gotten any estimates on either replacing the pit or putting
in a leach field yet (been waiting for the ground to dry out some
more) but one guy last fall quoted me $1500 to install a second
leach pit off the first one. Another guy told me that for the soil
I have (mostly gravel) I should have a leach field instead.
If you're buying a home with a non-working system, make sure you
find out what it's going to cost before you close the deal on the
house. I believe that before a contractor can put in a new system,
the design of the system has to be approved by the town (board of
health, prehaps?) so you may want to check with them as well.
Also, you could use the system even though the leach field is
completely blocked by getting the tank pumped out more often (like
every month, maybe).
good luck,
-willie
|
193.494 | Further | BAILEY::EKOKERNAK | | Fri May 08 1987 10:27 | 6 |
| My system is a leach pit, too. Those can be pumped, too? My soil
is "cow sand", i.e. moist, sticky sand. I wonder if a leach field
would be better.
Pardon me, I ramble. Do you mind telling me where you live?
|
193.495 | | WHICH::WHITE | Willie White | Fri May 08 1987 10:44 | 4 |
| I live right next door in Westminster.
-willie
|
193.175 | procedures for a replacement system|?? | HARPO::B_HENRY | Bill Henry | Mon May 11 1987 12:09 | 7 |
| I live in Shirley and I need a new septic system. Can anyone
tell me what kind of problems (permits, plans, board of health,
other red tape) I might run in to? Do I have to apply for a permit
first or do I just find a contractor and let him handle the rest?
Bill
|
193.176 | The contractor should do everything for you | CIM::CHAPMAN | Jim Chapman DTN 456-5593 | Mon May 11 1987 12:44 | 7 |
| When we had new drain field put in last summer the contractor
did all of the work. Scheduled perk tests with the health
department, got the building permit, etc.
I don't believe the requirements for replacement of a system
are as strict as for a new system. For example no plan were
drawn except for the sanitarian's sketch.
|
193.177 | re .32 | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Mon May 11 1987 13:16 | 10 |
| Ah ! another inhabitant of bustling downtown Shirley.
Bill, this is not in response to your question, but it has occurred
to me, as I've developed a fine distrust of my home's builder...
Consider going to a larger tank size if the money's not too out
of line. It would give you a greater margin, and may help sway
any potential buyer with a large family (more than say 2) and a
city-bred type as well (like me). Just a thought.
Dwight
|
193.496 | More questions | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Mon May 11 1987 13:59 | 12 |
| I hope I'm not bothering you with these questions. How many people
in your house? And how long have you been there? Did you know
about the leach field problem when you bought it? How did you diagnose
the problem? Did you have any professional opinions?
How do I go about finding someone to do an estimate on replacing
it, etc?
Thanks.
Elaine
|
193.178 | In search of... | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Mon May 11 1987 14:32 | 7 |
| re .33
How do I find these contractors? Do I look under "Contractor" in
the Yellow Pages?
Elaine
|
193.179 | septic tank under concrete | EVER11::LOWELL | | Mon May 11 1987 15:25 | 12 |
| This is an update to 832.25. After that last snowstorm, I watched
very carefully as the snow melted to find that magical warm spot.
Of course, The snow melted around the concrete first! My worst
suspicions were confirmed this weekend by a neighbor. Her children
had been digging in the sand and had dug up the access cover to
our septic tank once upon a time. So... we checked and sure enough
the original (STUPID) owner poured a concrete slab over the septic
tank!!! We can get to an access cover by breaking off one corner
of the slab. I assume there are two covers, so my latest question
is -- can the tank be properly pumped from only one cover?
Thanks,
Ruth
|
193.180 | Let your fingers do the walking | CIM::CHAPMAN | Jim Chapman DTN 456-5593 | Mon May 11 1987 16:20 | 11 |
| > < Note 832.35 by TASMAN::EKOKERNAK >
>
> How do I find these contractors? Do I look under "Contractor" in
> the Yellow Pages?
Close, you look under "Septic Tanks & Systems"
I can give you a name of a very good contractor, but I don't think
he would come in from Michigan.
Jim
|
193.181 | | AUTHOR::FRIEDMAN | | Mon May 11 1987 17:41 | 7 |
| How about those "blue" tablets/bottles that help keep mineral deposits
from forming on the toilet, and also "freshen up the bowl"? The labels
on most of these say "Harmless to septic systems," but I'm skeptical.
I'll try one, but only if it only also says "contains no bleach."
M
|
193.182 | Under cover(s) | JON::ROZETT | We're from dif'nt worlds, mine's EARTH | Tue May 12 1987 09:28 | 8 |
| re: .36
Yes, you can pump out the septic tank from only one of the covers.
Mine was done yesterday. Now if I could only pump the sludge from
my leaching field!
/bruce
|
193.497 | | HOW::WHITE | Willie White | Wed May 13 1987 09:32 | 8 |
| re. 20
I have 4 people in the house and had been there about a year before
the problems started to show up. When my system started to back
up only 9 weeks after I had it pumped out, I new I had problems.
-willie
|
193.498 | Acid treatment | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Wed May 13 1987 13:59 | 8 |
| I have been learning a bit about this lately. Did anyone recommend
acid treating the leach field? My mother's next door neighbor had
this done with great results (family of 5 adults). I'm hoping that
this will help my situation. It's interesting that I've also seen
a handful of people say they have to get their leach field fixed
because it's been clogged by their own or the previous owner's abuse.
There oughtta be a law...
|
193.37 | A point of interest | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Wed May 13 1987 17:39 | 10 |
| A brand new, or well-cared for system, if not cared for AT ALL (i.e.
dump grease, use bad detergents, colored t.p., etc) will deteriorate
to the point of being a problem in seven (7) years.
This is under the best of conditions.
This has been learned by recent experience and subsequent extensive
informal research.
Elaine
|
193.499 | Take the Treatment | USMRW1::RSCHAVONE | Gone fishin' | Thu May 14 1987 09:29 | 37 |
|
I've heard of two different ways to treat a leach field, the most
common is the acid treatment, the other is with hydrogen peroxide.
Both are used for the same purpose, to clean the junk off the stones
in the field. However, both treatments can be used only so many
times before they too, are ineffective.
When you have problems with your leach field it's because it's full
of solid matter, and it won't drain. These treatments break up
the solid matter, allowing the field to have drainage. The problem
is that the solid matter doesn't disappear, it re-solidifies at
the bottom of the field, so after so many treatments, there is no
where for the solids to go, and you need a new field.
So, I would certainly opt for the treatment of the field first.
You're right there ought to be a law, for some though there is
legal recourse.
My brother-in-law and his wife bought an older home in Clinton from
a little old lady who lived there alone. Sometime after he bought
the house, they began having problems with the septic system, and
called the local septic guy to take a look. The guy showed up,
and immediately told them they needed a new leach field. "How do
you know that, without looking?" My BIL asked. "Because I told the
old lady 2 years ago, that she needed one then, do you think it's
improved in 2 yrs???" My BIL called his lawyer, and they filed
suit, and got some relief from the old lady on the cost of the field.
Sometimes there is justice.
rgds, Ray
|
193.38 | PUMP IT | USMRW1::RSCHAVONE | Gone fishin' | Thu May 14 1987 09:52 | 4 |
|
re.9 That's right, and if pumped annually, it should last 20+ years.
Ray
|
193.39 | unless it makes you sleep better | PSTJTT::TABER | April showers bring May black flies | Thu May 14 1987 10:45 | 11 |
| > re.9 That's right, and if pumped annually, it should last 20+ years.
My folks' house has gone in excess of 20 years without *ever* pumping.
No sign of problems. My brother and brother-in-law, both of whom have
spent many years in the "waste" business (we have a more jockular term
for around the house) say that a system properly sized for the number
of occupants in the house and properly sited should never need
attention. All the solids should get eaten, all the liquids drain away.
An annual pump out seems a little waste-full (sorry) to me.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
193.40 | Anyone try TX bacteria additives? | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I need an 'AUX' for my stereo | Thu May 14 1987 11:05 | 14 |
| re: .9
I was told by the board of health guy that septic systems should
last about 55 years before needing replacement. I was also told
that the worst thing you can do is use a disposal (not a problem
if you have town sewerage). I have a cesspool as well as a septic
system. The cesspool wasn't enough for the previous owners so they
added the septic system. What I'm curious about is if anyone has
used the TX-# bacteria additives to their systems. There is a whole
assortment of these (TX-1 to TX-11?) that range from totally harmless
like RID-X to specialty ones that consume grease (and are not harmless
if swalled).
-Jim
|
193.41 | RED-X | FROST::SIMON | Blown away in the country...Vermont | Thu May 14 1987 11:34 | 13 |
| re : > < Note 270.12 by HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI "I need an 'AUX' for my stereo" >
> -< Anyone try TX bacteria additives? >-
I've been putting RID-X into my system every few months. Can't
really say if it's doing much good as my system is only 3 years
old, I don't have a disposal, I send my clothes washer water to
a drywell, and theres only two of us living there and we are
hardly ever home. But no reason to take chances. Anything to
help break up the solids and keep the leach field clean is worth
the PM as far as I'm concerned.
-gary
|
193.500 | A DIY job? | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Thu May 14 1987 12:01 | 8 |
| RE: .23, .23
Can this acid treatment be done by us common folk or is it something
to be done by a pro? How is the acid applied to the leach field?
Does it kill vegetation over the field?
Phil
|
193.42 | | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I need an 'AUX' for my stereo | Thu May 14 1987 14:34 | 9 |
| I wasn't very clear. I use RID-X myself but I am curious about
the TX (whatever number) that specifically consumes grease. I never
dump grease into the drains but wonder if normal amounts from washing
dishes can ever pose a problem. And, if so, should this stuff be
used. The TX-# referenced above may be for drains only and not
septic systems, I'm not sure on that one.
-Jim
|
193.501 | | SNELL::RPALMER | Half a bubble off plumb | Fri May 15 1987 09:14 | 3 |
| I don't think it is a DIY job. I saw the guys do it to my mom's
house about three years ago, and it wasn't a pretty sight. They
poured 4 40 gallon carboys of strong acid
|
193.43 | What size fits all? | USMRW1::RSCHAVONE | Gone fishin' | Fri May 15 1987 10:56 | 8 |
|
re.11 Of course, the person who told me an annual pumping was
necessary was in the business, so the advice may have been slightly
biased. ;^)
How do you know if a system is properly sized?
Ray
|
193.502 | How much does the it cost??? | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Fri May 15 1987 11:51 | 10 |
| RE: .25
Where did they pour it? Into the tank? Over the leach field?
Into the pipe leaving the septic tank? I've never had reason to
gaze into a septic tank, luckily. Is it possible to reach the pipe
leading to the leach field? Isn't there something called a
distribution box between the septic tank and the leach field? Maybe
this is where it goes?
Phil
|
193.44 | to determine size... | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Fri May 15 1987 16:00 | 12 |
| re .15 "...how do you know if the unit is properly sized ?"
Rush right out to your nearest decent sized/stocked neighborhood
library and look up septic systems (I found a book in the Marlboro
library) which discusses exactly that - size.
Or contact the local board of health; better yet, the county extension
agent (for Middlesex County, MA : 369-4845). The number of people
in the house determines minimum size; eg., 1000 gallons for 2 adults
I think.
Dwight
|
193.503 | It is not fun. | RATTLE::GOODIE | Jim Goodie | Mon May 18 1987 16:55 | 10 |
|
Phil, you hit it right on the nose (no pun). They pour it right
into the distribution box on the leachfield side of the tank. They
don't pour it into the tank itself because it will kill the bacteria
which will ruin the tank or at least deter the working of the tank.
The cost is about $100 if you find the distribution box and dig
it up.
Jim.
|
193.45 | Ya gotta pump it sometime | CHFV03::SCHULDT | Larry Schuldt - WA9TAH | Wed Jun 03 1987 12:49 | 18 |
| Last winter our septic system failed. Since they previous owner
had put 4 feet of fill over the tank, we didn't even know where
the !@#$%^& thing was. A backhow had to be called in to find it
for us.
Eventually we got the tank pumped out, and I asked the operator
how frequently it should be done (the house was 8 years old). He
said about every 3 years should do it.... We have 2 adults, 2 kids,
and a thousand gal. tank.
I find it *real* hard to believe that _all_ solids will be eaten
and a properly cared for tank will _never_ have to be pumped.
Obviously, there are going to be differences of opinions about what
proper care is. Personally, I'd just as soon flush anything I want
down there and pump it out every 3 years @ $50 than dig a dry well
for the wash machine, etc., etc.
By the way, other people in the business have had another term
they use for the belief that a tank will never have to be pumped
out.... :-)
|
193.183 | Help with perc results(?) | COUGAR::TRANDOLPH | | Tue Jun 09 1987 17:08 | 5 |
| I'm going halves on a piece of land in Barre, MA. The owner supplied
perc results. What it says is ground water at 5 feet, ledge at 10
feet, recommend a curtain drain or a built up system. Can someone
interpret this for us? I'm aware of what a built up system would
involve, but what's a curtain drain? Thanx for any help! -Tom R.
|
193.184 | curtain drains | SUBSYS::FILGATE | | Tue Jun 09 1987 17:22 | 16 |
| > feet, recommend a curtain drain or a built up system. Can someone
> interpret this for us? I'm aware of what a built up system would
> involve, but what's a curtain drain? Thanx for any help! -Tom R.
A curtain drain is a ditch (deep) with a drain tile near bottom, and a
plastic curtain on the down hill side. The ditch is filled with porus
fill, usually crushed 1.5 inch rock (washed).
The idea is water flowing downhill is intercepted and drained to surface
where it won't be a problem. The net effect is the lowering of the
ground water table on the down hill side of the curtain (aka intercepter
drain).
The federal tax payers spent a lot of money on the research back in the
'60s through the USDA/ARS/SWC. They do work, I have one that is almost
300 feet long and 14 feet deep. Big bucks.
|
193.185 | Help! I'm sinking... | CSMADM::GREENO | It's all done with mirrors. | Mon Jun 15 1987 13:56 | 23 |
|
I am getting some rather large wet spots on my lawn, along with
'softening' of the soil. To the point that when mowing last
one wheel of the mower 'sank' into this stuff.
The area described is over my leach pits. (I have been told
there are three of them). I have a 1000 gal septic with a distribution
box about 50ft from that and the pits beyond. I had the tank pumped
out for the first time last year. We have owned the house for 8
and told that the 1000 gal system was installed 15 yrs prior. We have
never had any problems. (I had it pumped on the recommendation of
a friend when I "thought" we were having problems.)
All drains seem to be working ok, nothing plugged up. My concern
is with these rather large wet spots. I know we took on close to
two feet of water this spring (rain) and wonder if this may be causing
the problem, though I would think it would have dried by now.
Anyone else experience this before?
Any thoughts on next action to be taken?
Anything else I should check on????
Steve. :-(
|
193.186 | Try this | HAZEL::THOMAS | No <ESC> from reality | Mon Jun 15 1987 14:10 | 4 |
| Push a stick into the wet spot and pull it back out. If it smells
bad, you know what the problem is. If not, you're in luck and you
can just blame it on the rain. This is a trick I learned from the
guy who inspected my house before purchase.
|
193.187 | re-starting a septic? | SERPNT::THULIN | | Mon Jun 15 1987 14:24 | 3 |
| Is there anything one has to do to a spetic that has not been used
for several months ( about 4 months), before starting to use it normally
again.
|
193.188 | Still soggy | CSMADM::GREENO | It's all done with mirrors. | Mon Jun 15 1987 14:46 | 5 |
| .43
It don't smell good.
Can I then assume that the leach pit is clogged?
If so, what are the alternatives. (least costly first)
|
193.189 | distribution box? | BAEDEV::RECKARD | | Tue Jun 16 1987 09:58 | 12 |
| We had a similar problem. Turned out it was at a "junction box" or
"distribution box" or similar - the outlet from the pump from the holding
tank. Then our pump broke ... took two weeks for the guy to try to fix
the pump ... he couldn't ... bought a new pump. When he was installing
the new pump, I asked him about our wet spot, he said the two week layoff
was the best thing for a leach field.
So this doesn't help your situation, but my impression is that a plug
in a distribution box might be relatively easy to fix.
We still get wet spots in the spring, but we get LOTS of runoff from the
hill in back, as well as our neighbors leach field run off. A stick
stuck in the ground almost anywhere would smell. Good lush grass tho.
|
193.539 | Found answer! | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Wed Jun 17 1987 13:52 | 11 |
| FInal outcome:
I got tired of wondering so I set out to find the reason- shovel
in hand. While I thought I had already dug in the area, it turns
out there was only 4-5 inches of dirt covering the cement cover
of the tank, and that was sandy at best.
I assume that I will have to remove that stuff and put 6-8 inches
of good quality loam on it before I will have grass.
M
|
193.540 | Now mark it! | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Wed Jun 17 1987 21:48 | 14 |
| I'd suggest you place something distinctive but easy to move over
the cover after you put in your loam, and make sure to have the
location of the tank and the identification of the marker drawn up
in a set of plans that you keep in your files and hand on to the
next owner when you sell. The fervent blessings of the next owners
will follow you wherever you go.
Some friends just moved into a new house and the previous owners
had clearly marked the cover by setting aside a little raised flower
bed with landscaping timbers with a removable bird bath dead center
over the cover - very nice people!
/Dave
|
193.541 | | PARITY::WHITE | Willie White | Fri Jun 19 1987 09:58 | 7 |
| Sand over a septic cover is fairly common as it is a lot easier to
dig than dirt and rocks. But since your cover is only down a few
inches, put in some loam, gorw some grass, and by all means listen
to .-1 and mark it!
-willie
|
193.190 | It's a smelly job, but someone has to do it. | CSMADM::GREENO | It's all done with mirrors. | Tue Jun 23 1987 13:31 | 10 |
|
reg .42
I guesse I'll have to call someone in on the leach field problem.
Can anyone recommend someone that will service the Gardner Mass.
area. I had used Bill's from Ashburnham last time, but never had
a problem till he worked on it.
Thanks...
|
193.662 | Perc question | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Wed Jul 29 1987 16:08 | 6 |
| Do any of you know how long a perc test is good for? (This is in
Mass.) What perc rates are considered good/bad? Also, if it is
good for N months, does that mean you must begin construction in
N months, or just get a building permit in that time frame?
Elaine
|
193.663 | Varies | VLNVAX::SUMNER | Yes dear... put it on my list. | Wed Jul 29 1987 21:22 | 20 |
|
I think that perc tests validity varies amongst towns. The boards
of health in each town decide things such as times of the year when
a perc can be done (depending on the rainfall, the more the better)
and how long the perc will be valid. Most towns will allow you an
extension on the original perc providing you apply before the original
perc test expires.
You are supposed to have a valid perc test until the completion
of construction.
A perc test consists of pouring water in a freshly dug hole.
The bottom line is how fast the water drains from the hole. The
maximum drain time is 30 minutes per inch of water. The longer it
takes to drain the greater the cost for your septic design and construction.
Glenn
|
193.664 | perc is for septic design | ARCHER::FOX | | Thu Jul 30 1987 12:15 | 7 |
| I think the only thing a valid (and acceptable) perc test gives
you is a opportunity to get your septic design. Once you have
your septic design, you can get, no, make that *apply* for a
building permit. As long as you have all your other requirements
met prior to application for a BP. But the perc itself is there
to get a proper septic design.
John
|
193.665 | | CADSE::DIAMOND | | Thu Jul 30 1987 13:00 | 9 |
|
re -1
That depends on the town and state. Outside Syracuse NY, a perc
test is required before you can build anything. This includes land
that has sewer and city water.
Mike
|
193.666 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Jul 30 1987 17:57 | 9 |
| > Outside Syracuse NY, a perc
> test is required before you can build anything. This includes land
> that has sewer and city water.
As far as I can tell, that's simply a throwback to when they had to have a perc
for the septic system, and in a typical bureaucratic non-thinking manner,
they've never bothered to remove it.
Paul
|
193.46 | | SPCTRM::CHEEVER | | Fri Aug 28 1987 13:18 | 2 |
| Could I get the recommendation of a good pumping company? I live
in Carlisle, Ma.
|
193.504 | check this before you get a new field | FLIPIT::PHILPOTT | Rob Philpott, ZKO2-2/M37 | Fri Aug 28 1987 16:54 | 22 |
| Sigh, I just spent 15 minutes typing in my story of how I learned
more about septic systems than I ever really wanted to know. I
got tthe prompt to enter a title, typed it in, hit return and got
an error entering the note 'cause my network partner exited. Since
my editing subprocess was now logged out, I lost the reply and don't
have the energy to relate it all again (perhaps an expert noter
knows of a way to retrive such a lost message?).
Anyway, the point was, don't always believe the septic system
guys when they say "yup - yer leaching field is going", especially
if the house is only a few years (<10) old. A comment from a
guy putting in carpet at my house (he used to do septic work)
saved me several thousand dollars. He said "half the time,
you've just got a busted pipe; and they'll still put in the
leaching field". In my case, he was right (half right - I
didn't have a new field put in).
A large rock had crushed the pipe between the tank and the
d-box. Each guy I had out to estimate the job was saying
"new leaching field", "big $$$" ($3.2k-$5.5k estimates). After
this guys comment, I had one of them look for a broken pipe before
proposing the leaching field. Total repair bill: $375.
|
193.505 | yeast? | FLIPIT::PHILPOTT | Rob Philpott, ZKO2-2/M37 | Fri Aug 28 1987 16:58 | 7 |
| I have heard that flushing a yeast cake down the toilet every
one in a while (monthly?) will really keep your system in good
shape. it helps promote bacteria growth that's needed for
breaking down the waste. I've also that some folks that did
this NEVER needed to have their tank pumped. Any comments?
Rob
|
193.506 | SDC has a manual for VAXnotes now. | ARGUS::CURTIS | Dick 'Aristotle' Curtis | Fri Aug 28 1987 17:28 | 6 |
| .28:
Have you tried REPLY/LAST?
Dick
|
193.507 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Mon Aug 31 1987 09:59 | 11 |
| Re: .29
Not likely. Solids are solids are solids; some stuff just doesn't
get digested by the wee beasties, and that's what has to be pumped
out occasionally. If you treat your septic system with kindness,
it won't need pumping very often, but NEVER is pushing it. If you
do treat your septic system kindly, it won't need any yeast or
anything to help it along, and if you don't treat it kindly, yeast
(or anything else) won't help.
I doubt that yeast would help anyway; they're not the bacteria that
do the job in a septic tank.
|
193.508 | Yeast probably a good idea | CSCMA::L_HUGHES | | Mon Aug 31 1987 10:08 | 18 |
| I have heard about the yeast idea too. I don't think you just want
to flush the yeast cake down the toilet, you want to activate the
yeast first. To activate the yeast put it in warm water, around
105 to 110 degrees (if I remember correctly). Add a teaspoon of
sugar, stir and let it sit about 10 minutes. You know when you have
good yeast when the solution gets foamy on the top.
I have done this about every month or two for over a year. When
a service person came to pump the tank, we told him that we were
doing this. He said that we didn't need to any more because everything
was breaking down well.
I have a question about septic systems. I know there has been mention
of chemicals in the septic system not being good for it. How bad
is dumping liquid plumber (and the like) down the drains?
Linda
|
193.509 | Microbe Lift | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Mon Aug 31 1987 12:47 | 16 |
| I think yeast is the wrong kind of bacteria (like .31 said). The
stuff that works in the tank is anaerobic, i.e. no air bacteria.
For those of you with problem systems, the product you want is
"Microbe Lift". It is one quart of the right bacteria in a liquid.
It costs $12.00 (at my local Tru-Value Hardware). It has
recommendations for different levels of problems. If your system
has been diagnosed as borderline, one dose every six months, in
combination with proper pumping every 2-4 years should solve your
problems. There are more serious doses for more serious situations.
The best part is, it's all natural... no chemicals. My situation
is borderline, but my neighbors was a constant problem until they
used this and now they swear by it. I figure $24 a year is a small
price to pay.
Elaine
|
193.510 | | RUTLND::SATOW | | Mon Aug 31 1987 12:57 | 6 |
| We've had good results with Rid-X, which is in dry form. We were
having odor problems that we thought might be either too short a
vent pipe or problems with the septic, but a healthy dose of Rid-X
solved the problem.
Clay
|
193.511 | Rid_X | LOONMT::MOCCIA | | Mon Aug 31 1987 14:33 | 7 |
| Another satisfied Rid-X user. Also, it's cheaper than Microbe
Lift. Once a month, down the john. Greatly assists liquefaction,
supplements the anaerobic buggies that may have been killed off
by chemicals.
pbm
|
193.512 | Q: WHERE CAN I BUY RID-X? | DSTAR::SMICK | Van C. Smick | Tue Sep 01 1987 08:41 | 1 |
| Where does one purchase Rid_X and what does it cost?
|
193.513 | Spags for one | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | There's no time like REAL-time | Tue Sep 01 1987 10:15 | 8 |
| >>Where does one purchase Rid-X and what does it cost?
Spags of course! Actually I suspect you could buy it just about
anywhere. I believe I paid $2.79 for it at Spags and have even
seen it on sale there in the past.
-Jim
|
193.514 | | REGAL::ASCHNEIDER | Andy Schneider - DTN 381-2475 | Tue Sep 01 1987 10:21 | 4 |
| Rid-X is available at any grocery store.
andy
|
193.515 | | FLIPIT::PHILPOTT | Rob Philpott, ZKO2-2/M37 | Tue Sep 01 1987 13:00 | 10 |
| re: REPLY/LAST didn't work. NOTES$BUFFER came up empty. This
was even though I had NOT exited NOTES. I think the problem was
because the note was not "successfully" entered and perhaps it
didn't consider it to be my LAST reply.
Thanks for the input on yeast - I hadn't tried it myself, since
I didn't really have any "normal" septic system problems - other
than that busted pipe.
Rob
|
193.516 | Small question | ARGUS::CURTIS | Dick 'Aristotle' Curtis | Wed Sep 02 1987 14:05 | 6 |
| Might one assume that these microbe doses, which will help things
out when you have problems, will not cause problems if you apply
them as preventative maintenance when you don't have problems?
Dick
|
193.517 | You can never be too rich or have too much bacteria | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Wed Sep 02 1987 14:46 | 2 |
| re: .40 That is correct. I've never heard of too much bacteria
|
193.518 | huh? | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Wed Sep 02 1987 14:48 | 6 |
| re: .35
Excuse me, but how is $2.79 a month cheaper than $12.00 every six
months?
Must be new math.
|
193.519 | | RUTLND::SATOW | | Wed Sep 02 1987 15:16 | 8 |
| re: .42
While you may want to dump a whole box down the drain if you have
a problem, the normal preventitive maintenance dose is something like
a half cup, so the $2.79 box lasts for several months.
Clay
|
193.520 | RID-X is for PM | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | There's no time like REAL-time | Wed Sep 02 1987 16:24 | 15 |
| Re: .40
That's the idea behind Rid-X. I don't believe it has any claim
of helping you when you have a problem but it IS for preventative
maintenance. The directions are something to the effect of flush two
cups the first time you use it and then one cup per month thereafter.
There is a company that has bacterial products specifically for
when you have a problem. I don't know the name of the company but
their products are something to the effect of FX-5, FX-7, etc..
They do have PM type products but the ones that consume a quantity
of grease overnight are not 'harmless' like the RID-X type and warn
you of the hazard. I have a problem with my kitchen drain and
am considering trying this stuff out. If I do, I'll post the results.
-Jim
|
193.521 | Water flow | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Tue Sep 08 1987 09:54 | 31 |
| Received from fellow noter and passed along to all... Elaine
------------------------------------------------------------
From: EAGLE1::KONG "Tom Kong BXB1-1/E11 293-5361" 19-JUN-1987 10:50
I was just wandering around the Booksmith at Coolidge Corner
the other day and glanced briefly at a book on plumbing.
It has a chapter on maintenance of septic systems. I didn't
read it in detail, but what I learnt was the following:
There are two kinds of bacteria doing the digestion. One
kind survives anarobically (sp?) and they live mainly in
the tank, doing all the predigestion. The yuk then flows
to the leach field where the second kind of bacteria
breaks it down aerobically. Animal fats are not good
to the bacteria, not to mention they also clog the pipes.
Too much water flow is also no good. That is why many
people hook up the washer separately to a drywell. High
water flow supposedly washes out the crud before it gets
digested in the tank, so when it gets to the leach field,
the aerobic bacteria cannot handle it, thus clogging
the leach field. The book also mentioned that if you
smell foul odour near the tank/leach field, the most probable
cause is too much water flow, like too many people living
in a house for the septic to handle.
Anyways, enough rambling for now. I used to have sooo much
more free time before owning a house....
/tom
|
193.522 | Go natural | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Tue Sep 08 1987 10:35 | 14 |
| re: .44
Jim,
The Microbe Lift I mentioned would be better than the FX products
you mention. It is heavier duty than the Rid-X, and it is all natural.
The most extreme use of it is if you have a very bad grease build
up in the tank, so as to warrant acid treating of the tank, the
Microbe Lift will get the system going again once the acid has worked
its way through the system.
I suggest you look into harmless natural methods first.
Elaine
|
193.523 | I was mistaken | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | There's no time like REAL-time | Tue Sep 08 1987 11:44 | 15 |
| re: .46
Elaine,
I didn't mean to imply that this stuff was not harmless in your septic
system but rather if someone were to ingest some. I went back too
look at the descriptions of these and I was wrong...FX products
are harmless. Now I'm really lost. I can't remember which product
I was reading the description of that was good for removing sludge
build-up in drains. I could have sworn I saw something that specified
a quantity that would be consumed over a period of time. I'll check
into the Microbe Lift you mentioned.
-Jim
|
193.47 | Does water hurt? | MIST::LANE | | Tue Sep 08 1987 20:45 | 5 |
| Why does dumping your washer water into the septic system hurt?
Since it adds nothing to the solids, as long as your drain field
is large enough I don't see why there is a problem.
Jeff
|
193.48 | see parallel reply | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Wed Sep 09 1987 10:40 | 7 |
| Re: .20
See note 991.45, Jeff. With three different septic system notes
going at once (270, 832 and 991), it is sometimes difficult to decide
where to add comments.
Elaine
|
193.524 | Data | MUSTNG::MOCCIA | | Wed Sep 09 1987 12:22 | 9 |
| Forbes Magazine recently ran an article on a company that specilaizes
in engineering graywater recycling systems for home and office.
The company's figures were interesting for anybody considering the
modification of a septic system: in a home, 40% of the water usage
is applied to washing clothes; in a commercial establishment, 90%
of the water usage is applied to flushing toilets.
pbm
|
193.525 | What's the problem w/Septic Tanks & Washing Machines? | XANADU::COFFLER | Jeff Coffler | Wed Sep 23 1987 12:00 | 25 |
| I recently went to my town hall to look at the septic system plans for
my house, and it looks like I won't be able to build a dry-well for the
washing machine. The seasonal high-water table is only about four feet
down (if I recall correctly), and town regulations state that the
bottom of a dry well must be at least four feet from the seasonal
high-water table. Thus, if I wanted to put the washing machine on a
separate system, I would need to build a separate leech field.
The thought of building another leech field is not encouraging; I'd
need to clear some land of trees, fill in a significant portion of
land, and do some more landscaping. Not something I'd like to do ...
Then I got to thinking: Is the harm of a washing machine on a septic
system due to the load on the septic tank (i.e. diluting the water in
the septic tank relatively quickly), or is it more due to the load on
the leech field itself? If I located the D-box for my leech field (I
have pretty good measurements from known locations so finding it
shouldn't be too difficult), would it be better to drain the washing
machine directly into the leech field (bypassing the septic tank), or
would it be better to leave the system as is (draining into the septic
tank)? The leech field is supposed to be more than large enough for a
three bedroom house-load of people - considering that I live alone, I'd
venture to say this is certainly the case.
-- Jeff
|
193.526 | dump to the tank | FLIPIT::PHILPOTT | Rob Philpott, ZKO2-2/M37 | Wed Sep 23 1987 14:56 | 18 |
| There's a couple of problems that I can see with going directly
into the septic tank. One is the large volume of water it dumps
in. The second (and perhaps more serious) is that most detergents
that you would use in a washer will kill the bacteria (even the
anaerobic type?) that breaks down the normal waste.
However, dumping directly into the d-box may cause another problem.
The washing machine wastewater may contain a lot of lint that might
clog the holes in the leaching field pipes. Also, again, the soap
might also build up and clog the holes (in addition to also killing
bacteria in the leach field).
If you can't go to a separate drywell, I'd vote for dumping to the
tank and staying away from the d-box.
just my opinion...others?
Rob
|
193.49 | Septic tank pumper | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Wed Sep 23 1987 16:06 | 4 |
| Does anyone know someone in the Pepperell/Townsend area who pumps
septic tanks. I just called a place and they wanted $90 which
I thought was high.
|
193.50 | $90 is reasonable | CLOUD::SHIRRON | Stephen F. Shirron, 223-3198 | Wed Sep 23 1987 16:17 | 4 |
| $90 is not high; a month ago I had two pumped, one in Acton and
one in Marlboro -- both were $110 or so.
stephen
|
193.51 | go for it! | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Wed Sep 23 1987 17:06 | 9 |
| re: .22
$90 is a good price, but it probably means you have to expose the
cover for them.
Man the clothespins!
Elaine :-0
|
193.52 | | VIA::ASCHNEIDER | Andy Schneider - DTN 381-2475 | Thu Sep 24 1987 11:11 | 12 |
| re: .22
I'm not sure if $90 is a good deal. Up here in NH, I had St. Onge
come out to do my tank, and they did all of the digging, pumping,
and replacing of the dirt AND sod (couldn't tell it was ever done),
and the cost was only $60. I don't know if Mass is higher or not,
but the price difference seems like a lot.
Just a thought.
andy
|
193.53 | watch for higher prices | TOOK::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Thu Sep 24 1987 11:11 | 8 |
| It might also be going higher soon. Many pumpers in that area that
used to haul the (whatever) to Lawrence found themselves looking
for other places to dump when an incinerator in Lawrence was forced
to close down for at least a month. Because in most cases they had
to travel further to dump, they ended up jacking up their prices.
$90 does not sound like you're being taken for a ride.
Jim
|
193.54 | | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Thu Sep 24 1987 13:27 | 4 |
| How big is the tank? I live in Holden, MA and was quoted $96 for
500 gallons or less. Aprox. $50 to pump, $40 to dump. $25 additional
if they had to dig up the cover. You could this yourself though.
|
193.55 | More on the Septic Dumping Situation | LOONMT::MCWILLIAMS | | Thu Sep 24 1987 14:04 | 21 |
| Re: .26
Actually it was the Sewerage treatment plant in North Andover that
closed its doors to outside contractors. The problem was that the
nearby residents were complaining of bad odors. The residents
contention was that the plant was handling more sewerage than it
should, hence the ban.
The ban is due to come off Oct 1, 1987. In the interim the plant
has discovered, that some of the treatment bacteria died due to
heavy metals dumping by a local company, which they claim will be
rectified shortly. The residents committee is still holding for
the ban to continue (isn't local politics wunnerful).
I became familiar with this when we went to see about a septic
inspection for a new house we are trying to buy. The local septic
service told it would cost $100 and they would have to apply for
an "emergency" permit to do it. After Oct 1, 1987 they would charge
$60, and wouldn't the special permit.
/jim
|
193.56 | Septics | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Sep 24 1987 15:23 | 6 |
| Thanks for the input. It looks like $90 is the going rate
around here.
Why do they charge separate to pump it into their truck and then more
to dump it?
Can I tell them I want it pump it out, but not to go dump it?
|
193.57 | rural landscaping | TOOK::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Thu Sep 24 1987 18:47 | 8 |
| Re: < Note 270.29 by VIDEO::FINGERHUT >
> Can I tell them I want it pump it out, but not to go dump it?
Sure, but they're probably bill you to replace the truck they leave
sitting in your driveway!
(:>
|
193.58 | Town specific charges? | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Fri Sep 25 1987 10:27 | 12 |
| re .29:
Since Westford just had a special town meeting that included this -
Each town in Mass. must have a specific arrangement for where septage (is that
really a word?) may be dumped. The cost of dumping depends on what the dump
site charges.
From this, I assume that the pumping companies are breaking the billing
up because the dump charge is town dependent?
/Dave
|
193.59 | A guess... | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Fri Sep 25 1987 13:09 | 9 |
| I would also venture a guess that they break down the charge to
educate people about the process. As this stuff gets harder and
harder to get rid of, the dumping charge will increase much faster
than the pumping charge. They probably don't want people thinking
they are ripping them off when dumping charges (which they have
no control over) skyrocket. Its also important when comparing prices
in different areas. Just a guess, though...
Phil
|
193.675 | HOW'S A PERC DONE | RICKS::CHENEY | | Tue Sep 29 1987 10:29 | 7 |
|
I'm in the process of having a septic system designed , and found
that the area that was perced is gonna cost close to 10k for a
system. So I'm gonna hold off for now and attempt to find a better
location for it. Could someone give me details on how to do a perc?
thanks, gerry.
|
193.676 | percing around New York | USRCV1::MILLERG | | Tue Sep 29 1987 12:41 | 3 |
| From what I understand, all they do is dig a small hole, fill it
with water and time how long it takes to drain. Soil samples might
also be taken. It really depends upon the person doing the testing.
|
193.677 | Whats the real scoop | RICKS::CHENEY | | Tue Sep 29 1987 14:22 | 4 |
|
I'll be doing it myself. I know that you dig a hole , and add
water and count. However , I've heard 2' deep 1' deep and you add
3" of pea stone. Has anyone done there own ?
|
193.678 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Sep 29 1987 14:33 | 26 |
| I doubt that a perc you do yourself will have any effect on the legal limit of
the leach field; after all, in the interest of saving money now, you might very
well shade the results a bit. I suspect you have to have some registered third
party do the official perc.
But, if all you want to do is find a better place for it, you can use almost
any perc method you want, so long as you're consistent. Do one first where the
leach field is currently placed, and then try other places, using the same
method. One thing I do know about them is that you're supposed to saturate the
ground fairly well - pour water in the hole, and then keep adding water to keep
it at the same level for about 15 minutes, then measure the amount of time the
level takes to drop one inch. If you find another place in your yard where the
perc is significantly better, then call in someone to do an official one.
Remember the the cost of the field is also dependent on the depth of the
seasonal high water or ledge. Here in NH, the bottom of the field must be 4'
above seasonal high water (which they determine by oxide deposits in the soil)
and 8' above ledge. If you find somewhere that percs better but the water
table or ledge is higher, it may very well cost you MORE, not less.
Also, if you have any other areas on your land that you could bulldoze fill
from, you can save a lot of money. We had them move a small hill on our land
to make the septic system, and saved about $3000. As the excavator said,
"You've already bought all THIS dirt, why buy more?"
Paul
|
193.679 | I watched a real one! | MILRAT::HAMER | master of the 14 line reply | Tue Sep 29 1987 16:31 | 29 |
| Details may vary from reality here because I was watching in silence
and had a vested interest in the process and its outcome, but I think
this is a fairly accurate picture of a perc:
They remove all topsoil and go down to a certain depth. In my case a
back hoe dug a hole about 4' deep. Then at the bottom of that hole,
the engineer dug a hole about 10" in diameter and about another two
feet deep.
He filled the smaller hole with water and kept replenishing the water
to keep the hole filled for about 15 minutes. Then he measured the
amount of time necessary for the water to go down one inch and then
the second inch.
Then they repeat the entire process 50-100' away: you need a primary
and secondary field. The secondary field is for sometime in the future
in case the primary field fails.
According to the engineer and the Board of Health person in attendance
(it was more like a ritual circumcision than anything else with all
the realtors, officials, buyers, engineers, diggers, etc., standing
around!) the rate of 2" is the best they will allow.
They told me the cost of a system primarily determined by the ground
water, because of the amount of fill necessary to bring in to raise
the bottom of the field 4' over the ground water. The speed of the
perc determined the size of the leach field.
John H.
|
193.60 | | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Tue Sep 29 1987 22:45 | 5 |
| I had Alan Bancroft of Pepperell inspect my tank this year (for
a refinancing). The inpection-only was $35, I forget his quote
for a cleanout - I think ti was around $70-80.
Rich
|
193.680 | A royal flush | RIVEST::KENDALL | I know engineers, they love to tinker. | Wed Sep 30 1987 08:12 | 10 |
| At least where I live, Gloucester, Ma., I had to hire a certified
civil engineer to do the perc. The perc also has to be done in
the presence of an agent from the city's board of health. It turned
out that the only place on my lot where the leaching field could
go spanned across 65 feet which had to be filled on one side and
ledge blasted on the other. My septic system ended up costing me
about $10,000.00. And now within the next two years city sewerage
will be coming down my street which I must hook up to for a mere
$2,400.00. Homeownership, I love it.
|
193.61 | Septic cleanout | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Wed Sep 30 1987 09:44 | 7 |
| > I had Alan Bancroft of Pepperell inspect my tank this year (for
> a refinancing). The inpection-only was $35, I forget his quote
> for a cleanout - I think ti was around $70-80.
It's $95. He's the one I got to do it.
Thanks.
|
193.681 | | AMULET::YELINEK | WITHIN 10 | Thu Oct 01 1987 14:06 | 7 |
| RE: .4 > This sounds accurate. I saw it being done on a friends
land but didn't recall all the particulars. Just remember,
The town codes must be adhered to should they be more
restrictive than the state. The state codes are the minimum
acceptable.
MArk
|
193.133 | Where's the clothespin? | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Mon Oct 26 1987 15:49 | 10 |
| I have noticed a slight nagging septic-like odor coming from my
bathroom sink. I notice it sometimes when I put on my make-up in the
morning. The drains in the bathroom are both slow (the tub and
the sink can't handle a large flow of water). Could these things
be related?
I'm a single resident of a septic tank and pit designed for 2.5
people.
Elaine
|
193.134 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Oct 27 1987 08:48 | 15 |
| > I'm a single resident of a septic tank and pit designed for 2.5
> people.
Well, there you go. You really should move out of the tank into a house. No
matter how you scrub those tanks, it's nearly impossible to get the smell out.
:^)
Seriously though, yes, the slow drain could be related to the smell. The slow
drain shows something clogging the drain (brilliant, right?). The smell shows
that the trap is going dry (also brilliant). If the clog is fibrous (like
hair, lint, etc), and extends from the bottom of the trap, over the top and
down the drain further, it could act as a siphon drawing the water out of the
trap. You should be able to fix it by clearing out the drain.
Paul
|
193.135 | The real problem | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Tue Oct 27 1987 09:23 | 2 |
| Thanks, Paul. I'll call my realtor this afternoon!
8-)
|
193.62 | Shrewsbury septic cleanout $$$ | CURIE::KAPINOS | | Wed Dec 02 1987 16:18 | 28 |
|
The cost of pumping a tank in Shrewsbury is $90 with something
like $28 of it going for the dumping charge. As far as frequency
of pumping we have it pumped in mid-fall every year. There are
four of us in the house with lost of flushing, etc. The $90 once
a year is much cheaper then replacing a septic system, like some
of the people in notes 832 and 991 are facing. As far as additives
like RID-X etc. go, the guy who pumps and inspects mine says they
are not good to use since they tend to liquify all of the things
that you would rather have settle to the bottom. Once liquified,
they travel out ot the leach field and clog the field. This guy
says the reason you pump is to remove this sludge at the bottom
of the tank. The longer you wait between pumpings the harder the
sludge gets. If it gets too hard they have to chip it or replace
the tank.
By the way you can save some money on the pumping charge by
locating and uncovering the access cover yourself. I let them do
it the first time then I measured and drew a map. Now it takes
me around 15 minutes to locate and dig the hole and that saves me
around $25. Also, as gross as this sounds the guy that cleans my
tank hoses it out and does an inspection every time. He puts a
ladder in and looks for cracks in the tank and input and output
baffles.
|
193.547 | Approved Septic/Disposal Alternatives? | PSYCHE::WAGONER | | Mon Feb 29 1988 12:18 | 14 |
| I've searched this conference for information on alternative
methods of sewage disposal - legal in Mass and came up empty-
handed.
The SEPTIC notes were all on existing systems. Does anyone
know what approved alternatives exist? (Clivus Multrums and
two-holers are not what I'm looking for.)
Some States allow or will variance sand filters; evapo-
transpiration systems; aerobic systems;_________(others?)...
Thanks a heap!
Gary
|
193.548 | splat..... | ZEPPO::TASCHEREAU | Dukaki-nomics? NO WAY! | Tue Mar 01 1988 10:14 | 6 |
|
Aerobic septic systems? Is that like when the SH_T hits the fan?
Sorry, I couldn't resist ;^)
-Steve
|
193.191 | Shouldn't affect spetic system should it? | DEBIT::LAVASH | Same as it ever was... | Mon Apr 04 1988 13:20 | 15 |
| I just had a house built this winter, and the topsoil hasn't been
brought in yet. Last weekend we set up a volleyball net on top of
the fine sand we have covering our leechfield. Now I am seriously
considering having a couple more loads of fine sand dumped there
rather than loam. I figure the sand is cheaper than the loam so the
builder should have no problem with agreeing to it.
I can't see too much problem with this can you?
I will use railroad ties or landscaping timbers to hold in the sand and
it will be at the same grade as the rest of the lawn.
Thanks,
George
|
193.549 | ? Extension Agent ? | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Mon Apr 04 1988 17:34 | 8 |
| I like this once-a-month response method -
Have you tried contacting your friendly, county Extension Agent??
Middlesex (MA) County - 617 369-4845
Then try the State's offices - Health, Water Conservation, ...
Dwight
|
193.192 | If it's anything like mine was... | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Tue Apr 05 1988 00:11 | 10 |
| RE: .48
Ummmmm.... Did you happen to smell anything???
If not, then you probably will this summer and it might be tough
getting people to play VB.
A beach it ain't...
Phil
|
193.193 | No smell | DEBIT::LAVASH | Same as it ever was... | Tue Apr 05 1988 09:55 | 16 |
| RE: .49
We didn't smell anything at all. This a brand new house with
a septic system that is big enough to support six people and
there is only my wife and myself living there.
This is a slightly raised system. The mound was about 1 1/2 feet higher
than the normal grade. But they regraded and the mound is very slight.
The Vball area would only be on the very top and not on the sides of the
mound.
If I bring in another 4-6 inches of sand should this provide
enough of a buffer zone? The water will leech downwards through
the gravel of the system will it not?
George
|
193.194 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Tue Apr 05 1988 11:29 | 8 |
|
I would still wait until you've spend a spring and a summer there
before doing anything over the leech field. I don't think you'd
damage it (unless there are very heavy people playing VB ;-)), but
I think you might regret it later if there is a problem. Just put
the net up and wait...
Phil
|
193.63 | Do I need bacteria? | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Tue May 31 1988 14:03 | 19 |
| I have read 270, 832, and 991, and (believe it or not) still have a question...
Our tank is 25 yrs old - seems in good shape. When we bought the place last
year, the septic inspector said it didn't need a pumping until this year. (It
was 2 yrs since the last pumping at the time). We have no disposal, we do
drain our washer into the system (3-4 loads/week w/Tide), and, because I
didn't know better until recently, we had been putting what small
petroleum-based chemicals we used down into the system.
We had it pumped today, the guy's only comment was "there were lots of solids
to pump out, and you're low on bacteria". Of course, he had his company's
once/month chemical additive to sell me, only $95/yr for 12 treatments.
I have no complaints with the system - seems to drain just fine. My question:
In the absence of symptoms, how do I know whether adding bacteria will do me
good or harm, and how do I tell how much is right to add?
thanx/j
|
193.64 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Tue May 31 1988 14:18 | 20 |
| I don't believe that too MUCH bacteria would do any harm to the
system. Too little of course, and the system would start to back
up because of the solids. I don't believe you need once a month
treatments. That seems excessive. There is a company on the market
called "ROEBIC" that sells bacteria for septic systems. Their re-
commendation is once a year. If you continue to pump the tank
every 2 to 3 years, I don't believe you should anticipate ANY
problems with the system. Bacteria by itself, reproduces extreme-
ly fast, additives are usually recommended when indigestible chem-
icals and other solids that are accidently or purposely flushed
into the system which kill the resident bacteria. Petroleum pro-
ducts are a no-no though because if it gets into the leachfield
it can clog pipes and/or coat the ground so that absorption will
not occur. However, no amount of bacteria will help in that sit-
tuation.
My suggestion would be to just maintain a 2-3 year pumping
schedule, stop the petroleum flushes, and let nature take it's
course. If you want to add bacteria to give the startup a boost,
fine, but one treatment should be enough. Roebic costs about
$10.00.
|
193.65 | Beware of 'quickie' pumpers | ULTRA::STELL | Doug Stell, LTN2-2/C08, Pole J9, DTN 226-6082 | Tue May 31 1988 15:21 | 9 |
| The buildup of solids could be the result of improper pumping on
previous occasions and not a sign of anything wrong. We had faithfully
pumped our tank several times, using a local pumper (Acton). This
year, we called a 'certified' guy from out of town and I stood guard.
It turned out that the previous pumper took only the fuild, never
touched the solids and never that there is anothe whole section
to the HUGE tank. It was 2/3 full of solids, all of which has now
been removed.
|
193.66 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue May 31 1988 19:41 | 4 |
| Monthly treatments??? Forget it. No need at all, if you treat
your septic tank with any kind of consideration (as discussed in
other notes), and if you dump bad stuff in the septic system
all the treatments in the world won't help.
|
193.739 | Info on Septi-Clene? | WILLEE::FRETTS | doing my Gemini north node... | Fri Jun 03 1988 14:31 | 26 |
|
Hi all,
Hope I'm not duplicating a request here, but since the file is
so large I thought this would be the quickest way to get an
answer to this question.
Has anyone out there heard of a product called "SEPTI-CLENE"
by a company called Miller-Plante, Inc., Cliffside Park, N.J.?
We received a mailing from them advertising this product as a
blend of high-potency enzymes that act as a catalystic agent
and speeds up the fermentation rate when coming in contact with
organic waste. They advertize that it is 100% safe to humans,
animals, all plant matter and pipes, including plastic. It is
also supposed to do away with the need to have a septic tank
pumped out.
The cost is $119.00 for 20 lbs. (6-year supply).
Any information anyone has on this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Carole
|
193.740 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Jun 03 1988 14:42 | 4 |
| This isn't a duplicate request, but for a quick way to find out what's in this
file, check out note 1111. Also see note 1.1 for some basic info on the file.
Paul
|
193.741 | doubts | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Jun 03 1988 15:30 | 14 |
| It is also supposed to do away with the need to have a septic tank
pumped out.
Does it break down grease? If not, the tank will need to be pumped.
The cost is $119.00 for 20 lbs. (6-year supply).
Maybe I'm just feeling cynical, but if the stuff really worked, surely
they'd let you buy it a year's worth at a time. Note that $119 is about
the cost of getting it pumped once. I believe pumping every 2 to 3 years
is recommended, but I've heard of people who only pump once every 6 years.
(I'm buying an old house with a cesspool, so I plan to pump yearly.)
Larry
|
193.742 | | WILLEE::FRETTS | doing my Gemini north node... | Fri Jun 03 1988 16:04 | 21 |
|
RE: .2 Larry
Thanks for your reply.
Apparently, this product contains Lipase enzymes that "attack all
fats and greases, breaks down their molecular structure and
dissolves them".
It also contains "Amalyse enzymes - These enzymes break down all
starches they come in contact with, as with Lipase Enzymes the
molecular structure is broken down and the starches are dissolved.
Protease - The most common of wastes found in Septic systems,
these particular type of enzymes literally feed on, break down
and dissolve all organic wastes of the protease family. All
the mentioned enzymes are Salmonella negative, non-pathogenic,
non-toxic and harmless to animals and man."
C.
|
193.743 | | BPOV06::SJOHNSON | I've found my Victorian at last!!! | Mon Jun 06 1988 13:19 | 21 |
|
In the process of learning about septic systems, which I had to do because I'm
buying my first property that has one, all advice points towards staying away
from septic additives of any kind, they won't do anything to help the system.
Nothing can replace having the tank pumped every 3 years or so. This gets rid
of solids like grease the can't be broken down by the bacteria/enzymes. (they
float in the tank, and are kept out of the leaching system by baffles, which
should be checked periodically too, to make sure the floating grease and crap
doesn't get into and clog the leach fields.)
And human waste contains all the enzymes needed to keep the system working
properly to break down other solids.
I have a nifty booklet put out by the Vermont Agency of Environmental
Conservation, that gives a wealth of info on how septic systems work and how
to maintain them. If anybody wants a copy, send mail.
Steve
|
193.744 | MINE WORKS /NOT EVERYONES DOES! | GRANPA::JRUBBA | | Tue Jun 07 1988 03:27 | 17 |
| I have not heard of the product called SEPTI-CLENE, but have been
using a product called RID-X for the eight yrs I've been in my home.
Last week I had my septic tank pumped out for the first time and
the consensus was that it could have waited. The usual solid cake
of solids usually floating on top did not exist. There was about
10-12 inches of loose solids at the bottom.
The only problem with septic systems is that no-one is an expert!!!
Ask ten people the same question and get ten different answers.
There are pros and cons about using any additive at all. Some
say that it causes the solids to break up too rapidly and end up
clogging your leach field. Others say the opposite.
There seem to be alot of variables to begin with to affect the
operation of a septic system, type, pipe grade, soil conditions,
design, who installed it, and did he care what type of job he was
doing.
By the way, I'd like to see a copy of the "Hints Book" mentioned
in reply #4
|
193.195 | a septic poll (truth by consensus) | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Tue Jun 07 1988 12:34 | 5 |
| For those of you who use RID-X (or generic)
how often, and how much? (and why?)
thanx
|
193.196 | | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Tue Jun 07 1988 17:21 | 5 |
| re .52: < Note 832.52 by BINKLY::WINSTON "Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA)" >
We toss in about a cup (of Rid-X) once a month.
/Dave
|
193.745 | Re: .4 - %MAIL-E-NOSUCHUSR, no such user SJOHNSON at node BPOV07 | PARITY::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Tue Jun 14 1988 17:26 | 15 |
| >I have a nifty booklet put out by the Vermont Agency of Environmental
>Conservation, that gives a wealth of info on how septic systems work and how
>to maintain them. If anybody wants a copy, send mail.
I too am in the process of learning about septic systems after
recently moving into my first house with a very green fast
growing grass spot in the back yard. (The grass really does grow
greener over the septic tank!!!) Could I trouble you for a copy of
the "nifty booklet put out by the Vermont Agency of Environmental
Conservation"?
Thanks for your generous offer to make copies,
John F. Klebes
Mailstop: TWO/B20
|
193.746 | Similar pamphlet from MA DEQE | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Tue Jun 14 1988 18:37 | 14 |
| I picked up a small pamphlet on septic systems published by the
MA Department of Environmental Quality Engineering (DEQE). I got
it at the Pepperell town hall, though I'm sure if you call DEQE,
they'll be glad to send you a copy (once you find the right phone
number).
By the way, the only class of chemicals they recommend using are
root killers, if you have a problem with tree roots in your septic
system. They explicitly recommend against using additives, and
suggest DIY annual inspections and periodic pumping instead. I
doubt they're biased in favor of the septic tank pumping companies,
though I can see how they might be biased against chemicals.
Gary
|
193.67 | | SALEM::DHILL | We take our own chances; pay our own dues | Wed Jun 22 1988 17:18 | 28 |
| Most of the discussion in here (and other "septic" notes) implies
that the liquid in the leach field disperses into the ground. In
reality, according to the (former) head of the Board of Health in
Acton, a high percentage (40% or more) evaporates.
This is why leach fields are (should be) located close to the surfaced
and why the grass grows so well over them (plenty of moisture).
One of the methods used to improve this evaporation is to vent the
field (upside-down "J"s), which you can spot in the middle of lawns
and parking lots of buildings with septic systems. Parking lots,
of course, inhibit evaporation, but they also reduce the amount
of rainwater that enters the field - somewhat of a "wash".
The implication is that you should NEVER put anything over a leach
field that will retard the evaporation from it. (The former owner
of our house had installed an above-ground pool over part of our
leach field. We moved the pool and had a noticeable improvement
in the septic system.)
The other implication is that you should be doubly watchful of any
suspended (or dissolved) solids that may make it to your leach field;
evaporation of the liquid in the field (almost 100% water) will
increase the concentration of those solids, thereby speeding the
process of clogging the field, thus inhibiting the dispersal of
the remaining liquids into the ground.
David
|
193.68 | the grass grows green | ATLAST::DROWN | SAD ):| SAD | Wed Jun 22 1988 17:58 | 13 |
|
A related question.
I have heard various opinions about having trees, shrubs, gardens,
etc. planted on the leach fields. Seems on the one hand they would
help suck up water, but the roots might clog things up or, for gardens
and fruit trees, the fruits/vegetables might concentrate evil
substances.
Anyone know?
/steve
|
193.69 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Jun 23 1988 09:26 | 7 |
| Re: .42
I'd avoid anything with significant roots.
On another subject that has been asked about before:
I got my septic tank pumped on Monday and asked the guy if salt
from a water softener would hurt the septic system. He said no.
So...I hope he's right!
|
193.70 | Cruisin' on the septic system | NAC::S_JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Thu Jun 23 1988 10:28 | 6 |
| I've heard people say that it is not a good idea to drive a car
over a septic tank or leach field. Is there any particular reason?
How about fairly large machinery, like a Bobcat. The weight would
be spread out over the surface of the treads. Is that OK?
Steve-who-wants-to-do-landscaping-near-the-septic-system
|
193.71 | Crunch | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Thu Jun 23 1988 10:52 | 6 |
| The danger of heavy machinery over the septic system is that the
pipes in the leach field will be crushed. This may not apply to
a small Bobcat.
pbm
|
193.72 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Thu Jun 23 1988 11:31 | 19 |
| RE: .43
Perhaps this is better asked in the GARDEN conference, but how close
can you get to the leach field with trees? The leach field in our
new house (soon) is maybe 10-20 feet from the front. (I don't know
for sure.) I want to plant hemlocks or other dense foliage as a
privacy hedge along the front line. Should that be safe enough?
RE: .44, .45
Any suggestions as to to what to do to strongly discourage drivers
from going over the leach field? I'm thinking of both friends visiting
(who should be discouraged by a row of landscape timbers and/or
flowers) and contractors (who may not be discouraged by anything
less than a mine field). I've heard of one story where some
construction or landscaping crew drove over a leach field after
explicitly being told not to.
Gary
|
193.73 | d-: Like, nauseating, man! :-P | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Thu Jun 23 1988 15:39 | 8 |
| .42:
FWIW, some friends figured out where the leach field was when they
brought in a bunch of daisies and put them in a vase on the dining
room table.
Dick
|
193.649 | Cesspools | CNTROL::WONG | | Tue Jun 28 1988 15:11 | 18 |
| Cesspool Question
-----------------
I am almost 1/3 through reading all septic related notes but still
have not found the answer. It may be there but if someone could
just tell me where to find this acid it would safe me much time.
My tank was pumped and the person recommended that I pour 66%
sulphuric acid into the tank to dissolve the grease buildup over
the years. I don't know when the tank was last clean before this
but now it seems like water is coming in at a rate faster than it
can be leached. The man recommended 20 gallons , cost $100.
Is there any product out there for DIY that will cost less ?
Many Thanks
Tat
|
193.650 | Acid Treatment | CURIE::POLAKOFF | | Wed Jun 29 1988 13:17 | 10 |
|
When I had that problem, the guy that pumps my cesspool did an "acid"
treatment. It cost about $40 over the cost of pumping (he had to
pump to get the cesspool empty of all sludge). It worked.
Good luck!
Bonnie
|
193.651 | | BPOV06::S_JOHNSON | I've found my Victorian at last!!! | Wed Jun 29 1988 16:13 | 11 |
|
Do you or any of your neighbors have WELLS in the area of the septic/leach
system??
If so, I'd think twice before putting any kind of acid into the ground.
Steve
|
193.652 | ex | CNTROL::WONG | | Fri Jul 01 1988 18:03 | 4 |
| The houses around me all have town water and sewer. Mine does not
have town sewer because of the leach in the front of the house.
Tat
|
193.197 | Oversize Septic Tank with Caution | CHALK::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Jul 13 1988 17:11 | 13 |
| An earlier reply suggested installing an oversize septic tank.
This is not necessarily a good idea. These tanks do there job only
if there is a certain flow through them. i.e. the flow should be
enough to refill or flush the entire tank every so often. Tank
sizes are set based on the number of bedrooms in the house.
Experience has shown that the water use is very closely related to
the number of bedrooms. (I've no idea how commercial installations
are figured.) I think that if you make the tank too large there
will not be enough flow for it to work properly. I also think that
building codes or health regulations or whatever are pretty
restrictive as to how much you can deviate from the "standard"
design size for a given number of bedrooms. (I believe that the
formula may also take into account the type of soil.)
|
193.198 | family sizes & number of bedrooms change over time | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Jul 13 1988 19:01 | 17 |
| re .54:
Suppose that the kids grow up and move away - should mom and pop
have their septic tank made smaller to keep it working? Or take my
house, which has 3 bedrooms but has 6 rooms that could be used as
bedrooms. WHen I get my cesspool replaced, I'd like to get a
4 bedroom or 5 bedroom septic tank if the price is practical, so
that I can increase the size of my family or sell to someone with
a larger family without illegally converting one of my non-bedrooms
into a bedroom (they are non-bedrooms only because the cesspool isn't
approved for more than 3 bedrooms). You mean I can't do this
and keep the septic system working? I confess, I thought it was
more a matter of maximum capacity than minimum flow rates. Any
other opinions/information?
Thanks,
Larry
|
193.199 | Kids Kids and more | VLNVAX::LEVESQUE | The Dukes a DINK! | Thu Jul 14 1988 09:38 | 12 |
|
The size doesn't matter unless its too small. I just purchased
a large ranch with an oversized septic system. The original owners
(just two of them) had lived in the house for 30yrs.
I had the septic tank inspected and the guy was very impressed
by the size and type of system I had. He mentioned that whoever
put it in did the right thing by over compensating. It now allows
me to move in and fill the house with kids.
BAL
|
193.200 | ex | VLNVAX::LEVESQUE | The Dukes a DINK! | Thu Jul 14 1988 09:41 | 9 |
|
By the way, I have a friend who had a house inspection done on
a chalet and the inspector told him not to buy the house because
the septic system was inadequate for any additional rooms. The house
had two bebrooms and John wanted to add two more in the basement.
So there a case were to small is no good.
BAL
|
193.201 | High limit and low limit | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Thu Jul 14 1988 12:26 | 8 |
| A septic tank can be no larger than the perc test indicates, and
must be large enough in proportion to the number of bedrooms.
But if you have 3 bedrooms (and a septic for 3 bedrooms) with 13 people
living there (sleeping in dens, living rooms, family rooms, lofts),
guess what happens to the septic system?
Elaine
|
193.203 | Upper limits | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Thu Jul 14 1988 16:57 | 19 |
| re: .59
I'm not sure if you meant to smile. In my neighborhood the houses
cannot be larger than 3 bedrooms because of the septic system, because
of the perc rate. In fact, if a family has more than two adults
and one child they are in trouble.
I think what you're saying is if we could make the tank large enough
(and maybe the leach field, too), we could put multi-family dwellings
on our lots. But we can't because the septic location is limited
by nearby wetlands. I was trying to point out that there is more
to figuring the size of a septic system than the number of bedrooms
in a house. Unfortunately my neighbors and I don't have the luxury
of having an oversized tank. I'm waiting for the results of your
checks.
Elaine
8-)
|
193.550 | Waterfront Septic Systems | SAGE::DERAMO | | Mon Jul 25 1988 13:21 | 33 |
| I'm in the beginning stages of looking at lakefront land. Eventually
I'd like to build a summer cottage.
I'm interested in a quarter acre lot on a pond. There is currently
a cottage on the property that hasn't been used for several years,
and would need to be torn down (my opinion).
The lot is fairly level, rising gradually from the shore line. At it's
highest point, the land is perhaps 4 or 5 feet above current water
level (which is higher in the Spring). I've been told by neighbors,
that beneath the topsoil is sand/gravel (typical in the area).
My concern is that the land may not take a septic tank/leach field.
system. On the listing sheet is SEWER: Unknown.
I've noticed that some other waterfront cottages have holding tanks
-- I think around 750 gallons in size. Is anyone familiar with
these? What are the pros and cons?
I spoke with a woman in the board of health office in town, and
she said that the town discourages the use of holding tanks, and
requires a hearing for approval. Why would the town not like holding
tanks?
I guess what I need is a basic lesson in septic systems, as applied
to seasonal cottages, near water. Previous notes do not seem to
cover this area, and have no mention of holding tanks.
Thanks for any info.
Joe
|
193.551 | My experience | SALEM::ARNOLD | | Tue Jul 26 1988 13:57 | 27 |
| Maybe I can offer some advice having recently gone through this.
We just put in a complete system, as there was a cesspool prior
to this. We are on water, and wanted to do something ASAP, so we
wouldn't pollute the water we were swimming in! Holding tanks hold
1000-2000 gals. and need to be pumped out regularly. They must
have an alarm system on them (this is NH - I don't know about other
areas) and the tank must be registered with the town and the disposal
company. When they go to dump the tank, the name and address must
be on the list for the dumping station. They are frowned upon -
according to the engineer - because once in the ground and inspected
people have been known to punch holes in the side - thus creating
a cesspool and they don't have them pumped regularly. We had to
put in a chambered system with a pump-up chamber (up hill) so that
the leach field is in the back (street-side) of the house. After
all we bought waterFRONT property! (Family humor)
Chances are if the deed says nothing - there is nothing. Depending
on the location of the site and the grade of the hill would depend
on the cost of the system. I understand NH is more stringent than
others. We had to have plans drawn up - approved by the town and
then the state. The system was inspected 3X during construction
by the town engineer. Not all town engineers are empowered to do
this, so the state would have to send someone down to inspect.
(Another delay, I forsee).
Good luck, I hope I've helped.
Denise
|
193.552 | Buildable Lot! | CURIE::BBARRY | | Tue Jul 26 1988 14:28 | 27 |
| < I'm interested in a quarter acre lot on a pond. There is currently
< a cottage on the property that hasn't been used for several years,
< and would need to be torn down (my opinion).
A side note: Make sure you have a buildable lot, BEFORE you buy the
property. Lot size is not really an issue, but proximaty to wetlands
may be a problem. The existing building is grandfathered, but any
significant changes, would have to be approved.
< I spoke with a woman in the board of health office in town, and
< she said that the town discourages the use of holding tanks, and
< requires a hearing for approval. Why would the town not like holding
< tanks?
All disposal plans have to be approved by the board of health. The
simplest cases receive an ANR letter, if nothing out of the ordinary
is required. Othwerwise, a public hearing is required for a variance.
In general holding tanks are not approved, because they are a high
maintanence system. In your case you probably can argue that it
would be better then what currently exists, and other alternatives
(hook into sever system, private treatment plant) would create
financial hardship. This is how it works in Townsend, MA.
Brian
P.S. Please specify were you live, so people can provide more
acurate answers. The laws, their enforcement, and interpretation
varies from town to town, but are fairly uniform.
|
193.553 | Septic pumps are FUN | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Jul 26 1988 14:43 | 1 |
| If you must put a pump in your septic system then you must, but
|
193.554 | pricing engineered plans | TOLKIN::RIDGE | | Tue Jul 26 1988 14:44 | 5 |
| re: .1 how much did the engineered plans cost?
how much for the installation?
|
193.555 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Jul 26 1988 14:45 | 8 |
| < Note 2490.3 by POOL::HAMMOND "Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684" >
-< Septic pumps are FUN >-
If you must put a pump in your septic system then you must, but
--> I have no idea where the rest of this reply went. I'll try to re-enter it
when I have time. Sufice it to say that I advocate avoiding septic pumps if
at all possible.
|
193.556 | More Info ... | SAGE::DERAMO | | Tue Jul 26 1988 16:57 | 39 |
| Re .2 If I can't put a septic system on the property, I don't intend
to buy it.
I've spoken with a person at the town's board of health, and requested
a copy of septic rules and regs. I'll check these, and do some
research in Mass. General Laws Chapter 5 (including updates) pertaining
to sewage. I'll try to determine what the restrictions are on siting
septic systems close to water, and wells (there's an artesian well on the
property). The corner of the lot farthest from the water and the
well is uphill from the ideal building site. If a septic system
is even feasible, it would likely be here, and would likely require
a septic pump. I'd like to hear more about these (Re .5)
I've also requested a copy of the zoning by-laws. I want to
be sure that the lot is buildable (especially after tearing down the
existing structure) and that all grandfathering won't be lost. I don't
want to end up with a useless (but pretty) lot.
In my conversation with the woman at the board of health, I learned
that no more perc tests will be scheduled this year. I don't know
if they are all booked, if the proper season is passed, or if the
town is using this as a blockage to development.
I need to do a perc test before I buy, yet can't do that until next
year. Is there another way to determine septic feasibility? Can
I hire a septic engineer to look at the property and offer his
professional opinion on it? Can I do an unofficial perc test to
see if I should even be spending my time looking at this property?
Ideally, I'd like to make the septic feasibility determination
soon, as the property seems desireable, and the first person to
determine that a septic system is possible and the lot is buildable,
will likely buy it. I'd like to be the first with the answer.
Any advice?
Joe
|
193.557 | more reply info | SALEM::ARNOLD | | Wed Jul 27 1988 09:20 | 27 |
| re: .4 the plans were $400.00 and the state approval procedure cost $50.00
(this is NH). The installation was $6K. We had bids from 6 to 11K,
and choose the 2nd lowest. We dug our own test pit, and tree
stump removal was included in the 2nd bid.
re: .1 Typical of cottage lots - we are on a slope and have a very small lot
(58'by 100'). The pump up was the only alternative - luckily it has an
alarm. We didn't want to do it either for obvious reasons - one more
thing to break down/maintain, etc. Financial hardship re: a holding tank does
not hold water (in Salem anyway).
re: pumps - according to my engineer and the installer they're pretty state-of
the-art now. It's in a 500 gal chamber all by itself - so if something went
wrong we could just dig it up. There is a float in the chamber and when the
water hits the float the pump kicks in - it's not running all the time.
re: .5 - tearing down the structure means new construction (and new codes).
What's seems to be done alot in our area is one wall is saved - so you're
modifiying. I don't know much about that.
re: .5 - when we looked at property (on water) in MA the septic and water
had to be 100' from one another. I don't know if that was MA code or
something the VA required.
Denise
|
193.558 | Who to ask, specifically | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Wed Jul 27 1988 13:08 | 19 |
| re: .6
Talk to the town building inspector. The procedure if you own the
land is to apply for a building permit to him/her. Then if it doesn't
pass zoning, he rejects the application and you go to the zoning
board of appeals for a variance. If it is near wetlands, he sends
the request to the Conservation Commission so they can determine
if the Wetlands Protection Act applies, and if you need to deal
with the DEQE. If it does not have a valid perc test and septic
plan, he rejects it and sends you to the Board of Health, the Town
Health Agent (officer, whatever).
My advice: talk to each of these people before you buy. If you
are lucky and the Building Inspector is helpful, you may avoid the
other people, but if you want to be sure, check with them all.
The above regulations are for Mass. Good luck.
Elaine
|
193.559 | Public Hearing Required | CURIE::BBARRY | | Wed Jul 27 1988 13:29 | 9 |
| re: .8
A note of caution. Unlike the Building Inspector who has final
approval authority, the Board of Health, ZBA and Conservation
Commissions require majority or better approval by the board.
A single member can not promise approval of a plan without a
public hearing and vote by the board, especially prior to
purchasing the property. You also left out the Historic Distric,
Planning Board and Watershed Association(if you have them:-).
|
193.560 | A whole different ballgame | STAR::SWIST | Jim Swist ZKO3-4/U14 381-1264 | Wed Jul 27 1988 15:40 | 8 |
| Re: .-1
Second the caution. I built a place on the water in Maine and found
that rules/jurisdictions/etc totally changed at the magic number
of 250' from the water. Past that, no one cared much about anything.
Inside it even the state got involved in some things.
|
193.5 | Well for outdoor watering only? | MEMV03::ROGUSKA | | Mon Aug 22 1988 15:27 | 40 |
| I am wondering if it makes sense (is possible) for us to have a well
for outdoor watering only, I have no idea what is involved in having
a well.
Some background, two years ago when the foundation for our addition
was dug we hit water and had to install drainage, we actually hit
an underground spring. Last September, when we dug the four foot
holes for the deck supports we hit water at 4' in a couple of the
holes and when it rained, and we had a lot of rain last September,
the holes filled to the top. So we seem to have water. I also
found out that 40 years ago the lot our house is built on was under
water, the house is built on fill......
So all this leads me to think that maybe we could put in a well
for outdoor watering only. I've called a few well places and have
been told that what I want is a dug well.
Question #1: What is a dug well?
Can anyone quess the expense involved? Will I have to have a holding
tank or will I be able to pump directly from the well to the hose?
I've called the town, Ashland Ma, but the health agent is on jury
duty and will get back to me next week. Part of the dilemma is
we need to put in a new lawn, front and back. We were going to
do the front this fall but with the water ban we can only water
from 6PM to Midnight so I'm concerned that we may be defeated prior
to even beginning. Now if we could put in a well maybe we'd be
better off to wait for next spring and then use the well water to
get the lawn going or at least we could use as much well water as
possible and use town water if necessary to allow the well to
replenish itself.
Another consideration is that we pay the sewerage based on water
consumption. If we use 100 cubic feet of water at the cost of $25
then we automatically pay $50 for that 100 cubic feet to go into
the sewer and its not! (Same with my washer that goes to a dry well)
So I'm paying for service I don't use and it bothers me!
Am I crazy?
|
193.6 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Tue Aug 23 1988 10:57 | 44 |
|
> Am I crazy?
No, it sounds like a good idea. The only thing you'll want
to try and figure out is the total cost of installation, use,
and maintanance compared to the price of using the city water
and sewer. I can understand how it would bother you to pay
for *not* using the sewer, but it might actually work out
cheaper to do so. For instance, if the well goes dry after
one year. Also, you should probably get the water tested
just in case someone (like a kid) happens to come along and
decide to take a drink out of the hose coming from the well.
It wouldn't hurt to know what's in it anyway. Another thing
you'll have to consider is enclosing or encasing the well some-
how so that no one will accidentally fall in and either get
hurt or drown. All these things will add up, so figure out
the usage you'll actually draw from it and whether it's cost
effective to do it.
> What is a dug well?
It is simply that. You'll most likely hire someone with a
backhoe, and they'll just dig until they get deep enough
to hit water, and then some, so you'll have some kind of res-
serve. Then you'll have to line the walls somehow so they
don't cave in, cover it, and install the plumbing.
> ...guess at the expense involved.
You can figure on about $85-$90 per hour for the backhoe, not
including the transportation fee, usually about $120, just to
dig the hole. Lining and structure would depend on your tastes,
and wht type style well structure you want to have. Plumbing
may not be too bad, especially if a sump pump or something sim-
ilar would give you enough water pressure to do what you want.
Then there's electricity too, but that could be as simple as
an extension cord in the case of the sump pump if you don't
mind dragging the cord in and out all the time.
I think there's some flexibility in cost, dependent upon the
complexity and asthetic quality of the well that you have in
mind.
|
193.7 | | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Tue Aug 23 1988 11:13 | 10 |
|
I am now drilling a well in Fitchberg Mass. for my house. I am
down to 700 ft at $7.50 a foot. The avarage well in my area is 340
ft.
Moral of the story,You can't plan the well cost very accuratly.
Local code states the well must be 100ft from the septic system.
Wayne
|
193.8 | DYI for the bold | CAMILE::BRACKETT | | Tue Aug 23 1988 11:26 | 7 |
| A neighbor of mine in NJ was digging a well by hand. He started
with a 4 ft diameter drainage pipe placed on end. As he dug the
pipe settled into the hole. When the upper end was even with the
ground he added another section. When we moved to Mass he was down
about 20 ft. Sure was scarry, no way would I get in there and dig.
_Bill
|
193.9 | And I thought _my_ digging projects was crazy! | CRAIG::YANKES | | Tue Aug 23 1988 12:30 | 7 |
|
Re: .8
What is the neighbor going to do when he hits water and has
to go lower to get a reliable supply? Put on scuba gear? :-)
-c
|
193.10 | DIY well | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Tue Aug 23 1988 13:53 | 9 |
| > A neighbor of mine in NJ was digging a well by hand. He started
> with a 4 ft diameter drainage pipe placed on end. As he dug the
> pipe settled into the hole. When the upper end was even with the
> ground he added another section. When we moved to Mass he was down
> about 20 ft. Sure was scarry, no way would I get in there and dig.
Did he dig from inside the pipe or outside? How many years has
he been doing this?
|
193.11 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Aug 23 1988 14:00 | 24 |
| Health authority people *hate* dug wells, because they are so
susceptible to contamination. What you're really looking for
though, is a very small diameter, deep pond that you can water
your lawn from! :-) The word "well" tends to imply "drinking
water" and other such things, and you don't need all that.
You basically need a hole in the ground. Get a guy with a
backhoe to dig a hole to bury about 12' of large-diameter
concrete sewer pipe on end; that ought to give you enough
depth. From your description, maybe 8' would be enough.
You may need to have holes in the sides of the pipe
so the water can get in easily; I think there's concrete
pipe available that is made with holes. It would probably
help to put crushed rock around the pipe too. But you're still
talking not big bucks. $500 for everything???
The idea of putting a submersible pump into it sounds like the
cheapest, simplest way to go. Put the pump into the well in
the spring with a hose attached to it, take it out in the fall.
Run an extension cord when you want to use it. Cheap.
Now, whether you could get away with doing things that way, I
don't know. The Powers That Be might decide that since it's a
"well" it has to meet all the requirements of potable water,
which would increase your costs dramatically, probably to the
point of being more than the idea is worth.
|
193.12 | another alternative | BCSE::JAHNS | Dean Jahns ZK03-2X07 DTN 381-0739 | Tue Aug 23 1988 18:34 | 13 |
| Back in Minnesota you can buy a well 'point' in any good hardware
store. You drive it with a steel fence post driver. In the old
neighborhood I lived in, the water table was very near the surface
as described here. It was very common to cut a small hole in the
basement floor, drive a point down about 6-10 ft, attach appropriate
plumbing to outdour spigots, and then thumb your nose at the city water
meter.
Only bad point was that the surface water was very high in iron,
and turned sidewalks, foundations, sidings, etc red if you sprayed
it long enough. Didn't bothr the grass any tho.
-dj-
|
193.13 | update on dug well estimates... | MEMV01::ROGUSKA | | Wed Aug 24 1988 10:25 | 30 |
| Contacted a well "digger" from Clinton that does this type of "dug
well". The well is not actually dug, he drills with an auger, he
can go down to a depth of 30'. His estimate on digging the well
was ~$650.00, with a holding tank and pump he thought it could go
as high as $1200 - $1500 depending on what type of fixturing was
used, assuming that you needed a holding tank etc. By the way the
hole he drills is only 3" in diameter. You do not have to commit
to actually putting in a well, he will come to the property, drill
test holes to see if he can actually get water, and test the amount
of water, the recoverable rate of the well etc. working on an hourly
basis at a rate of $35.00/hr.
Now he had some comments about the feasibility of actually hitting
water. One point he made was that the ground water we see may be
the result of clay in the soil - we do have a lot of clay in our
soil - so that there really may not be water to be had but just a
bit of surface water due to the clay content of the soil. Good
point. Available water may also be very seasonal, and may not be
there when hit with a drought. He also brought up the point of
payback for the investment etc. He thought that as long as we could
water at sometime during the day that a lawn would survive even
if it was from 6PM to Midnight.
All in all the fellow was very pleasant and helpful.
Now I still have to hear what the town would require.......would
the well have to meet the normal well requirements etc. The health
agent isn't in this week so the jury is out on that one. (Acutally
he is on jury duty!)
|
193.204 | Sanitary Tee??? | BPOV06::S_JOHNSON | Buy guns, not butter | Fri Sep 09 1988 14:02 | 29 |
|
I have a new septic question:
We had our septic system pumped out recently, and we found out that the
back baffle, which is in place to prevent floating solid waste from going
into the leach fields, had fallen down to the bottom of the tank. (we
sound see it down there leaning against the back side of the tank.)
We've been told that we can fix the problem by installing a
SANITARY TEE into the drain hole, and this will have the same effect
as replacing the baffle.
My questions are:
1. What, exactly is a sanitary tee?
2. Do you septic experts agree that this will solve the problem?
3. How should the sanitary tee be installed?
Thanks
Steve Johnson
|
193.205 | Call Rila Precast Concrete | GYPSY::GOETZ | | Fri Sep 09 1988 17:32 | 10 |
| I had the same thing happen to our tank. The fix was to replace
the inspection port cover that had the baffle on it. I was told
to call Rila Precast Concrete Poducts in Brentwood NH
(603)772-5301/4301. They had the cover I needed and it was FREE...
How 'bout dem apples??? Brentwood is ~15 miles east of Manchester
off Rt. 101.
Give them a call if you're close to the area.
Al Goetz
|
193.667 | Soil test | JACOB::STANLEY | Steal your face right off your head... | Tue Sep 27 1988 11:32 | 5 |
| I am in the process of buying some land in Maine. The sale is contingent
on passing a soil test. Is the soil test the same as a perc test? If the
soil test fails, what does that mean to me? Expensive septic system?
Dave
|
193.668 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Tue Sep 27 1988 13:46 | 10 |
|
As far as NH goes, I believe you are referring to a test pit.
Is the land going through subdivision? In NH when subdividing land,
it must be perc tested and have test pits dug to determine soil
content/consistency, and find out if there is any ledge around.
I was told by someone in the business that any land (in NH) that
had less than 3 feet of natural cover (soil), was considered un-
buildable. Of course, then there are the other 101 exemptions
that let you build there anyway, like above ground septics. It's
possible ME. has the same type regulations.
|
193.669 | | MSEE::SYLVAIN | Keep on running | Tue Sep 27 1988 14:25 | 11 |
|
The State of Maine has become very strict with perc testing,
especially if you are near any water (lake, rivers or ocean).
You cannot get a building permit on any land if the existing
property cannot pass the perc test. I'm not sure on the
perc test requirements (depth of hole and how long for the water
to drain). They will not allow a build up leach field.
Try asking someone in the Maine notesfile.
|
193.670 | | JACOB::STANLEY | Steal your face right off your head... | Tue Sep 27 1988 15:09 | 11 |
| < Note 1365.6 by SMURF::WALLACE "Life's a beach, then you dive!" >
> Is the land going through subdivision?
No, but we do plan to build on it.
re: .7
Thanks, I'll check in the Maine notes conference.
Dave
|
193.671 | Above ground systems | JACOB::STANLEY | I need a miracle every day... | Fri Sep 30 1988 12:38 | 8 |
| I just spoke with the realty agent concerning the soil test on the land
we're considering. The soil engineer told him that an above ground system
would be no problem. I haven't been able to reach the engineer yet, but
I would like to find out if anyone is familiar with above ground systems.
Does an above ground system mean that the soil test failed? I'd like to
have a better idea what I'm talking about when I reach the soil engineer.
Dave
|
193.672 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri Sep 30 1988 13:02 | 22 |
|
Well, I can tell you how it works in NH. There are two major
considerations for septic systems. High water table, and ledge.
In NH, septic systems are required to be 8 feet above ledge and
4 feet above the natural high water level in the area it is being
installed. So for instance, if you have land where there is 3 feet
of soil to ledge and the water table is 9 inches below the surface,
then you *have* to get an above ground septic. They bring in fill,
and raise the level to acceptable limits. In this case 5 feet of
fill will put the septic 8 feet above the ledge, and well over the
4 foot minimum for the water table. The considerations is the
amount of soil/fill to filter the waste from the leach field. The
inspector told me that 4 feet of soil/fill will filter the leach-
field waste enough, so that it could be consumed by an adult, but
would probably make a child sick. (ok fess up. How many of you
out there have four foot wells?)
Soil test failed? Well in the sense that the above ground systems
cost more, yes. An above ground system on your land may be no
problem, but the question is; at what cost? You may want to have
then give you some estimates on the cost of putting such a system
in. I suspect your looking at anywhere from 8K to 15k.
|
193.206 | Moved at the request of the author. | JOET::JOET | Question authority. | Mon Oct 03 1988 10:18 | 29 |
| ================================================================================
Note xxxx.0 septic/foundation w/o house 1 reply
HPSCAD::DANCONA 13 lines 27-SEP-1988 08:02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
anyone know of any problems with installing a septic system in the
ground prior to this winter, without having a house built until next
summer. It will be a 1000 gal system with a distr box and 50' x 20'
leach field. I'm wondering whether the ground freezing and thawing
will cause a problem. building permit expires in march, and i would
like to have the septic in when i go to renew it.
i guess while we are at it would putting a crawl space foundation
in be a problem this winter if no house was there ??
================================================================================
Note xxxx.1 septic/foundation w/o house 1 of 1
HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK 6 lines 27-SEP-1988 08:54
-< I wouldn't >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The major problem is that once it's in, NO heavy equipment can drive
over the it. If that happens, pipes are sure to be crushed. Most
people put the septic in last, just before landscaping.
Elaine
|
193.561 | Conflicting government requirements can be fun too | T337PG::IANNELLI | | Tue Oct 04 1988 14:42 | 105 |
| This is a long tale but in it you may find things to consider.
We live on a 10K square foot water front lot in N.H. Two years after
we bought the house a dry well "surfaced" (started to leak directly
on to the surface). It required close to $15,000, 20 months, a lawyer,
an engineer, three town officals, and three changes in the state
water pollution control board before we had fixed this problem.
Things that you may want to check and items that you may want to
consider:
1: Town minimum lot size requirement for a septic system.
Even though the house we bought was grandfather the requirement
to conform for a building permit was still enforced. The minimum
lot size was 3/4 acre since we didn't have that much space we had
to get waiver.
2: Minimum distance from surronding wells.
In New Hampsire and part of the septic must be at least 75feet
(horizontallly) from any well. Since we are surrounded by 1/4
acre lots we had to get releases from two neighbors. Further
the 75' limit is a state requirement some towns require more
(ours required 100 ft. yet another waiver)
3: In New Hampshire no part of your septic may be within
75' of a body of water. On a lot the size of ours the various
tanks had to be within this limit so we required another waiver
4: What is the zoning in the area? Our street was rezoned to
be seasonal (our house is grandfathered) the reason for the zoning
was in part to allow additional resrictions to be placed on the
septic systems (after all it's not like you live there year round!).
It also provides the town a way to prevent you from increasing the
floor space of the house or converting it to year round use.
5: Permits and plans are not binding on the town (or state).
Our plan indicated that it would use a poly septic tank. This
was approved early in the paperwork cycle. Two days (17 months
later) after we broke ground the building inspector said "this
town requires steel reenforced septic tanks". Our choices was sue the
town (we would not have a working septic nor was the contractor
interested in this idea) or go along. This required state approval
since we were changing the system. Oh yes we had already PAID FOR
the poly tank.
6: Not only is the approval cycle long but you may have to baby
sit it all along. We ended up paying the engineer to make weekly
(or bi-weekly) trips to concord to get the state personel to move
forward on the paperwork or to tell us what the latest hold up was.
They misplaced our paperwork for weeks at a time.
7: Holding tanks can be expensive! The problem here is that
treatment costs are extremely variable. The quotes for treating
(under an annual contract) the average waste from a family of
four including trucking and pumping ran from $500 - $700 per MONTH!
These costs are subject to inflation and the whim of the treatment
facility. If your town "buys" treatment services from another town
the rates to treat your sewage can be staggering!
8. While you don't have a conforming septic system the health
officer of the town usually pulls your occupancy permit. If you
are already living in the house the town must go to court to get
you out. However with out the occupancy permit you can't borrow
on the house because it can't be sold unless the buyer leaves it
vacant. Further you may find that you are constantly threatened
with litigation.
9: The state and town officals are not there to help YOU!
The whole issue of protection of wet lands and bodies of water has
become a very hot potato in various levels of government, with a
variety of suits being filed in state and federal court all throughout
new england. In many cases the states and towns turned their collective
backs on what was being built prior to the late seventies. Then
rather than spend money (gasp that horrible word) to fix the results
many laws were passed that effectively made the existing systems illegal.
These illegal systems were "grandfathered". They could be used in
their current form but NOT REPAIRED! Any repair or alteration of
the system in anyway required that the system be bought into full
conformance with ALL existing state and local requirements.
This did not fix the problems but the various offical could point
to the results of their "awareness of the problem". Now it has all
come home to roost and everyone is running scared. The only "politcally
safe" decision is to deny ANY attempt to put a "non-water tight solution"
i.e. holding tanks, on a water front lot with lmitations of set back
and size. So unless you really squeeze them the state and town
attempt to force you to that "solution". Realize that this is a
poltical process so engineering realities and cost are not considered.
Be prepared to be treated as an unclean scumbag by these "holders
of the public trust", after all you own the problem its not their
responsibility!
10: Some towns make life hard on septic (and probably other)
contractors. We only had one estimate! Why? Because out of the dozen
septic installers that I contacted only ONE would even come and
look at the problem! One of the officals in our town has quite
a relationship with the septic contractors. This coupled with the
requirement to deal with the state and all the waviers caused them
to be uninterested in our problem (more or less at ANY price).
Summary:
Before you buy a lake front property in new england get a
good lawyer. Verify exactly the zoning and other requirements to
which NEW building on that lot must conform. Then record everything
and in the event of trouble batten down the hatches and ride it
out!
|
193.207 | Baffle vs Santiary Tee | 28922::B_RAMSEY | Bruce Ramsey | Tue Dec 06 1988 18:39 | 9 |
| No, a Sanitary Tee is not the same as a baffle. A Baffle is a flap
which stops the flow from 1 direction but permits flow in the other
direction. A Sanitary Tee is a T shaped connector. Some have baffles
in them but most do not. I fail to see how a T connector would
stop back flow from the septic tank into the house. If the T had
a baffle then it might stop flow but where would the third leg of the
connector send the contents of your septic system??? I am not sure
I want to know but I sure you would if you install one.
|
193.564 | composting toilet vs septic | FACVAX::CORMIER | | Thu Mar 16 1989 17:01 | 23 |
| Hi,
I don't know if this is the right place to ask about this, but
I couldn't think of any other conference it would be relevant
to... I was reading an article in Country Journal about envir-
onmentally sound schools and one of the items mentioned in the
'why don't we use' column was composting toilets. I bought a
place 3 years ago that had a composting toilet that hadn't
been plugged in for awhile, and without going into details I
was totally turned off of the idea. I am planning to have a
septic system put in this spring/summer and am now rethinking
the sanity of this thanks to the article I read. Do anyone
out there know anything about composting toilets, like who
manufactures them, prices, new technologies, and how towns/
states building codes react to them. If I could save $6,000
(I already have a gray water system, so that's not a problem),
not contribute to further polluting of our planet and be satisfied
with the looks and performance of a composting toilet....why not
get one???
Anyone have any advice/knowlege to offer?
Sue
|
193.565 | | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Mar 16 1989 17:26 | 7 |
| > -< composting toilet vs septic >-
Start by asking your building inspector about it, and most likely
you won't have to worry about whether it's feasible.
Very few places will allow them.
|
193.566 | What kind of composter is this? | MECAD::MCDONALD | Teetering on the brink... | Fri Mar 17 1989 07:36 | 24 |
|
Plugged in? I guess there must be a different composting system
from the type I'm thinking of.
The only composting system I'm familiar with consists of a LARGE sloped
"bin" in your basement which relies on the "glacier effect" as well
as the introduction of other organic wastes (kitchen garbage, etc)
to complete the cycle. Waste moves slowly down hill and is attacked
by micro-organisms until it becomes what they call "black earth"
which is essentially mega-rich soil which you shovel a few buckets
out every few months.
The only systems I have seen were totally passive (no fuel needs
unless you opted for a duct fan in the venting system, or a
none-too-popular meshing blade system that supposedly sped up the
compost process by slashing the waste to bits as it was introduced).
I used to have brochures that I received from an alternate energy
group in the gov't (interesting side effect of this type of composter
is that the composting process generates a considerable amount of
heat that dissipates into the house) and the company being recommended
was a Scandinavian company.
* MAC *
|
193.567 | | MEMORY::BROWER | | Fri Mar 17 1989 12:55 | 6 |
| There's one by the name of Cleavous Moultron or something like
that. It can be found in the back of most organic gardening magazines.
As a previous noter mentioned they're not legal in most places.
Mostly due to some codes not being kept upto date. Supposedly you
start shoveling out clean sterile compost two and a half years after
the first flush
|
193.568 | Blast from the past!! | MECAD::MCDONALD | Teetering on the brink... | Wed Mar 22 1989 19:22 | 11 |
|
That's it! Boy did that jog my memory. The system I used to have
brochures on (as I described in .2) was Cleavus Moultrum (or
something like that) and I *did* first find it in an issue of
Mother Earth News.
Zoning laws are meant to be swayed! A little push with some serious
documentation is often all that is required. Nothing ventured, nothing
gained.
* MAC *
|
193.569 | Keeps the neighbors away I bet! | TOMCAT::FOX | | Thu Mar 23 1989 09:52 | 7 |
| How do these things cope with the odor created by the composting
process? I put my leaves and grass clippings in a bin in the back
yard, and that's creates a slight odor on occasion. I can imagine
what it would be like when you start adding human waste, etc to
the cycle!
John
|
193.570 | Keep Resale Value in Mind | DEMING::GULDNER | | Thu Mar 23 1989 15:54 | 9 |
| They are vented thru the roof(I beleive). I remember reading a story
years ago about a Cleavous Moultrum that someone "inherited". They
had to almost blast the stuff out of there as it didn't work-or
wasn't used properly. Ugh! another thought I'd have is it's effect
on the resale value of the property- I think it would be a detriment
in most cases. Maybe an incerating toilet is a better alternative,but
I've never heard/read on how effective they are.
Ed
|
193.571 | Documentation Found. | MECAD::MCDONALD | Teetering on the brink... | Mon Mar 27 1989 14:25 | 21 |
|
I stumbled (quite accidently, believe it or not) on a set
of the CLIVUS MULTRUM brochures I sent away for years ago.
At that time, the nearest distributor was:
CLIVUS MULTRUM USA, Inc
14A Eliot Street
Cambridge, Mass 02138
(617)491-5820
The brochures consist of specs and a long question and answer
brochure (too long to type in here). Among other questions, it
answers one brought up earlier: What about the neighbors? They
claim that the "aerobic decompositon" generates mostly carbon
dioxide and moisture and the system actually generates LESS
odor than standard plumbing vents.
The system ranged in price (at that time) from $1500-1700 depending
on options.
* MAC *
|
193.572 | I used one for 3 years | DNEAST::RIPLEY_GORDO | | Wed Mar 29 1989 08:23 | 39 |
|
Hi!
I had a composting toilet built for my last home here
in Maine. It was cement blocks in construction with a 6" plastic
vent pipe and rotating fan on the roof. The whole structure was
in the cellar with a nice oak toilet enclosure in the main floor
bath room. Inside the Cement block structure was a set of plastic
(1 1/2") piping to form a slanted grid. On this grid was laid
fine wire mesh (I think the mesh was 1/2" square holes?). The
was a fairly large clean out down at the bottom of the slanted
grid. This toilet was a 'two seater'. We would use onw seat for
6 months then the other for six months. Just before switching we
would clean out the side to be used.
Observation:
A bunch of orage peels put in every once in awhile would
completely eliminate any odor and in fact it was a pleasant smell.
A johson & johnson pest strip (the wide yellow ones) hung under
the seat support eliminated any small flies/fleas/whatever.
The temperature of the room where the cement enclosure is *MUST*
stay above about 65 degrees or the thing will not work!!! Very
important.
one should also design in a fluid overflow outlet. In our case
a piece of clear plastic hose (like used for cow milking machines?)
thet was buried, went thru the foundation wall and out to a 'dry
well'. The urine is the hardest to get rid of in a composting toilet
so it does tend to accumulate. The air vent on the roof does help
with the evaporation.
There was no odor outside at all.
The cleaning out process while phsychologically distasteful
was not a problem at all. The unit does decompose the material
to such an extent that smell is not a problem and the residue looks
like rich loom.
Hope all this helps. You will most likely have a problem down
there with getting a permit. Not so up here.
Gordon ripley...
|
193.573 | yeeeccchh ! | AKOV75::LAVIN | Oh, It's a profit deal | Wed Mar 29 1989 10:29 | 0 |
193.574 | "Backup" means many things... | DNEAST::OSULLIVAN_KE | | Wed Mar 29 1989 21:30 | 12 |
| -<yeeeccchh>- is just the term for it, but Gordon did say that it was
"psychologically distasteful." Remember, lots of people can't just
flush the toilet and forget about it - there's a big tank sitting out
under that lawn just waiting to be pumped in a year or two.... and
if you don't pump it, it's gonna come in your house and get you!
When I bought my present house, I had the septic tank pumped early on.
(The truck had "Cucka Sucka" painted on that plastic bug shield in
front.) I watched while the fellow went about his business, and
remarked, "I'm glad it's windy ... " He looked at me and said, "I hate
this GD job." I've never seen a more sincere look of "psychological
distaste."
|
193.74 | DIY septic inspection ? | AKOV75::LAVIN | Oh, It's a profit deal | Fri Mar 31 1989 16:21 | 8 |
|
Lots of opinions out here on pump_your_system don't_pump_your_system,
but nothing on inspecting your system. I know where the cover is, and I
know I can open it, does anybody know how to tell if your tank is
working correctly ? I don't have any problems, but I do send everthing
to the tank, and all these notes in here about sludge buildup and
ruining leach fields got me thinking that maybe there is a sludge
monster lurking in my yard ... Any DIY inspectors in the crowd ?
|
193.75 | Sludge should be < 25% | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Fri Mar 31 1989 17:23 | 18 |
| The MA DEQE puts out a flyer that discusses septic systems, including
how to inspect them.
Basically, you have to do two things, once the cover is off. First,
use a long stick to measure the sludge and scum (lower layer and
upper layer, resp.). Neither one should be more than 25% of the
total depth, so that the middle liquid layer is at least 50% of
the depth. Second, flush the toilets while the cover is off, and
make sure that liquid flows in and out of the tank without clogging.
(When we had this done, we had perfect, coincidental timing. The
building inspector just happened to be testing the toilets at the time
the septic tank guy was ready to check for flow.)
Gary
PS I've never tried this, and I'm not going to until I figure out
what to do with the stick after removing it from the tank.
|
193.76 | Just don't fall in... | HPSTEK::DVORAK | Drink Grim,the Decoffeenated Caffeine | Fri Mar 31 1989 18:11 | 61 |
|
Do not read this if you are eating your lunch.
I have done these measurements, just out of curiosity, when I opened my
tank prior to having it pumped. The "Sludge" is reluctant to adhere to
a wooden stick. I found it necessary to wrap some rag around the stick
in order to get a meaningful reading. The smell of the whole operation
is much less than you would expect. Discard the stick after use.
The tank for my house is 1200 gal, concrete, with partitions, and had
not been pumped for at least 7 years.
I am sure it is impossible to do a good cleanout job if you have the
tank pumped out through the 6" diameter inspection ports. If your
septic guy does it this way, I think you are getting very poor value
for your money. The "sludge" is much too viscous to move inside the
tank. Additionally, there are baffles in the lower half (and in the
upper half) of the tank preventing sludge migration. I feel it is
ESSENTIAL to remove both of the 2' by 4' access covers to pump the
tank. This means you have to remove the dirt from the top of the
entire tank. Mine was only 2' down, fortunately.
The guy who pumped my tank ( $75) also washed the inside down with a
garden hose.
Based on the "fullness" of my tank, I do not feel it is necessary to
pump more than about every 5 years. In my opinion, pumping every year
is gross overkill IF the tank is being emptied completely each time.
This is a cross-section of my tank, showing all the baffles which make
cleanout difficult. More or less to scale.
-------------------------------------------------------ground level
_o_______{-----}_____________{------}______o__
| | | | |
=======" | | | "=====
"IN" | | | | | "OUT"
| | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|_______|________________________|___________|
{----} is 2' by 4' cover, 4' deep into the screen.
o is 6" inspection port, through which pumping is ineffective.
=== is inlet and outlet pipes
|
| is baffles and tank sides.
Happy decomposing,
gjd
|
193.77 | | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Sat Apr 01 1989 23:22 | 14 |
|
Re: -1 HPSTEK::Dvorak
This is sort of a digression - but I must ask the question. $75 to
pump your septic tank!!!!! Where is is that you live? I just called
1/2 dozen places in the Acton/Concord/Billerica, MA area and all but 1
was $175 for up to a 1000 gal tank. The price jumped about $50 in the
last 6 months. I've had my tank pumped several times in the last
year (we're in the midst of having a whole new system put in) and
the price has gone up about $75 in this time. I guess it's getting
real expensive for these companies to dump the ...stuff. Anyway,
did you miss putting a 1 in front of the $75? Do you live in Mass?
Kathy
|
193.78 | | HPSTEK::DVORAK | Drink Grim,the Decoffeenated Caffeine | Mon Apr 03 1989 00:18 | 22 |
|
Yes it was $75, not $175. I did at the time get some $150 quotes.
I live just north of Worcester. I did call around a bit, and I think I
ended up using Holden Sanitation Co. 829 3793. ( I can't find the
bill just at the moment). Note that I did uncover the tank myself ( a
5 foot by 9 foot area 1 foot deep) , and I made sure I told that to the
people I called. (I used the phrase "it's all dug up", The septic
people find this easy to understand ;^) ) I did some mild bargining. I
did find prices varied significantly. This was all done last summer, I
should add.
Just to digress further, I suggest you do the uncovering yourself,
because you will be sure to uncover all of the access ports, whereas
the septic people may not. I also strongly suggest you be there to
supervise the operation, because if you are not you have no way of
knowing how thoroughly the job was done. When it is all done, that
tank should be *EMPTY*, and you can see the cement bottom.
If you have been using the same company all this time they may be
jacking the rate on you, figuring you are not calling around to compare
prices.
|
193.79 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Mon Apr 03 1989 09:17 | 19 |
|
Re: prices
Digging up the cover yourself can save $25-50. Also, there are sludge
haulers that take their sludge to a waste treatment plant, where they
are charged by the gallon. Then there are those unscrupulous haulers
that blow the sludge off into a field. It's up to you if you want to
ensure that the waste is taken care of properly, and pay for that piece
of mind.
Re: tank pumping
How often you pump depends so much on how old the system is, if it was
sized properly, and how well it was maintained. My system is a little
over 30 years old and is hanging in there, but it is nearing the end of
it's life. I have to pump every other year, or I get overflow.
CdH
|
193.80 | They dig, and you pay | GOLD::ROLLER | Ken Roller | Mon Apr 03 1989 09:24 | 16 |
| I second what was said in .52. Be there to watch, and by all measn,
if you can, do the digging yourself. I had my tanks pumped back
in DEC 87, and the cost was $85, plus 4 cents a gallon to be processed.
Sudbury and Wayland have a processing facility, so you get a bill
from the town. The interesting thing was that the pumper's charge
was something like $15 per foot if they had to dig to get to
the cover. In my case one tank was one foot down, but the other
was almost two feet down. That can add up real fast.
As a side note, the house I bought has an interesting setup. There
are two 600 gallon tanks. One tank receives from the baths, and the
other recieves from the kitchen sink and laundry room. I guess
the idea here is that you don't over load the "digesting" tank with
a lot of soapy/chlorinated water from the laundry.
Ken
|
193.81 | I used Greenwood. | GIAMEM::LAMPROS | Bill Lampros | Tue Apr 04 1989 16:40 | 7 |
| I live in Westford, Mass and used Greenwood Pumping to cleanout
my 1200 gallon tank last September. He did an excellent job. By
the way, I did the digging and exposed the top covers to save the
additional $25 charge. Total cost was $90 which included pumping,
( There was alot of solid ), cleaning, inspection and removal.
Bill
|
193.82 | Just curious | HPSTEK::DVORAK | Drink Grim,the Decoffeenated Caffeine | Tue Apr 04 1989 18:06 | 24 |
|
Re 270.53
* Also, there are sludge haulers that take their sludge to a waste
* treatment plant, where they are charged by the gallon. Then there are
* those unscrupulous haulers that blow the sludge off into a field. It's
* up to you if you want to ensure that the waste is taken care of
* properly, and pay for that piece of mind.
I find your comment a bit confusing. Are you saying that:
1) The integrity of a hauler is determined by his price, and
2) The haulers who charge the most are the most honest, while ones who
charge less are dishonest, and
3) In order to be morally responsible a homeowner should use the more
expensive haulers?
I'd be grateful if you could clarify.
Thanking you in advance,
gjd
|
193.83 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Thu Apr 06 1989 14:40 | 8 |
|
I inferred nothing of the sort. My point was, that you should ask the
hauler where it is going. If you are in an area that has a waste
treatment plant, and they don't mention it, or charge for it, then
maybe they aren't taking it there.
CdH
|
193.701 | Leaching Field Damage-Help | POLAR::MACDONALD | | Fri Apr 28 1989 16:37 | 25 |
| (Mr. Moderator, if this topic is covered elsewhere, do your job,
I couldn't find any reference.)
I have a unique problem that I will gladly give away - I had
my land plowed (as in farm tractor plowing) and I now know where
my leaching field is located.
The land was plowed about 40 or so feet from my septic tank and
when I went to inspect the work, I discovered accumulation of
septic water in the forrows left buy the plow; apparently the
plow went through a portion of my leaching field. There is no
problem in the house or with the septic tank - the question is
what can I do about it ?
My thoughts are centered around pick and shovel work to try and
isolate the fault in the event that the plow actually broke one
of the leaching distribution pipes. In anticipation of the next
question, the plow depth was probably no deeper than 8-12" and I
don't know how deep my lines are. I am planning on digging a
small trench across what I believe to be the leaching distribution
area, upstream from the apparent leak to make my attack from there.
Help!!!!!!
|
193.208 | Distribution box | GOSOX::RYAN | DECwindows Mail | Wed May 03 1989 11:56 | 12 |
| This is the only topic with keyword SEWAGE with any mention of
distribution boxes, so I'll ask here...
The house we just bought was hooked up to town sewer last August
(half the lawn torn up in the process). In the back of the lot
(away from the torn up area) there's a hole covered with a cement
slab (now broken), lined with concrete blocks, with a pipe in
the side, which we're told is a distribution box for the old
septic system. What is (was) the function of the distribution
box? Is there any reason not to fill it in?
Mike
|
193.209 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Wed May 03 1989 12:03 | 7 |
|
The D box usually connects the septic tank to the leach field. I would
guess you could fill it in if you're now on town sewer.
CdH
|
193.210 | D Box | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Wed May 03 1989 15:11 | 15 |
| If its got only one pipe going into it, I doubt it was a D box. The
distribution box takes the liquid outflow from the septic tank (1 pipe
in) and divides it to the leach field pipes (1 or more pipes out). The
D box in my previous house was not too big and maybe 10-12" deep. You
don't say how large the box you found was. A D box is solid except for
the pipes coming AND going.
If the item you have is much larger and a lot deeper, perhaps it is a
dry well that was used for waste water from the washing machine (which
isn't too good for a septic system). We need a bit more info on your
block "whatever" to properly identify it. If it has only one pipe, you
should be able to roughly trace the direction the pape takes back into
the house and see where it went.
Eric
|
193.211 | | GOSOX::RYAN | DECwindows Mail | Thu May 04 1989 13:33 | 20 |
| I'll take a closer look & some measurements when I get home, but
here's a fuller description: It's maybe two feet deep, 1� by
3 feet. I just recall one pipe in, coming in at right angles to
the house (i.e., the box is maybe 50 feet to the west of the
house, and the pipe is on the north side). The area dug out for
the town sewer is the full length of the north side of the house,
wrapping around the west side slightly. To the north of the
box is the bulk of the yard (including a couple of gardens), nothing
else particularly interesting. Oh, except I almost forgot, there
are a couple of storm drains (at least, that's what I think they
are), one on the west edge of the property towards the NW corner,
the other across from it at the east edge of the lawn (near the road).
Maybe this is just a different variety of storm drain? I really
don't think so, but I'll definitely hold off filling it till I'm
sure...
Is JOET:: up to VMS V5.1 and Notes V2.0? Maybe I could draw a map
with DECpaint and post it:-)...
Mike
|
193.212 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Thu May 04 1989 15:30 | 6 |
| From the description (especially only 1 pipe to it), whatever the
box is, it doesn't sound like a D box. The distance from the house also
sounds strange (usually the D Box is only a few feet from the tank
which is fairly close to the house). It the "box" solid or perforated?
Eric
|
193.213 | More info... | GOSOX::RYAN | DECwindows Mail | Fri May 05 1989 10:01 | 31 |
| Taking a closer look: It's a little less than 2 feet deep, about
16"x33". The bottom is mud and last night had a couple of inches
of water over it. I was able to stick a not-very-sturdy stick
about six inches deep before encountering much resistance. Took
a whiff of the stick - no noxious smells. The end of the pipe
is covered with a wire cage. The walls are concrete blocks (and
now that I've screwed things up by breaking the cover, the top
blocks are starting to tumble in).
Looking more carefully at the layout, the box is maybe 30-40
feet NW of the house (very rough guess, I'm not a good judge
of distance) and the pipe is on the north side of the box, so
it's definitely going away from the house. Another 30 or so
feet to the NW is what I identified as a storm drain - this has
a three-foot-square cover (not movable), the bottom of which is
even with the top of the ground on three sides, on the west side
the ground slopes down underneath, and there are flat rocks set
in the ground, so it seems clearly to be for drainage. Inside
I could see a wire cage like that around the pipe in the "D box"
but I didn't see a pipe (didn't bring my flashlight along).
Overall, except for its size it looked similar to by "D box".
So, it's looking more like rather than being part of the now-defunct
septic system, this thing is involved with draining the property,
which discourages my plans to fill it in. For what it's worth,
the land is lower than the surrounding property but does seem to
drain well (I saw no flooding problems in Tuesday's heavy rain,
except for a large puddle where I had done some serious digging
before planting grass). Any alternative interpretations?
Mike
|
193.214 | other alternatives | WILKIE::BERKNER | Tom Berkner 264-7942 MK01 | Fri May 05 1989 14:07 | 11 |
| How about a dry well for the rain gutters on your eaves?
How about a dry well for the drain in your garage?
As you said, perhaps a catch basin for draining your yard. This
sounds reasonable since the screen on a pipe would normally be at
the inlet end - unless they are trying to keep rodents, etc. out
of the outflow end of the pipe.
Could be a dry well for a sump pump.
|
193.215 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Fri May 05 1989 15:27 | 4 |
| From the description, it does sound like some sort of dry well. If you
can, try to trace the pipe back. Maybe its a drywell for the washer.
Eric
|
193.216 | | GOSOX::RYAN | DECwindows Mail | Fri May 05 1989 17:11 | 13 |
| It seems kind of far from the house and garage to have anything to
do with gutters or the garage drain (the garage is south of the hole,
the opposite side from the pipe), or a sump pump (no sign of one in
the basement). There's never been a washer in the house (well, we've
got one, but we haven't installed the hookups yet). I guess we'll
have to ask the neighborhood plumber to take a look, or some
other "expert" who might know, or check things out at town hall and
see if it appears in any records (at least the storm drains should,
right?). What town department would that be in a town with no
public works department (Pepperell, MA, specifically)? Planning?
Health?
Mike
|
193.702 | | VMSSPT::NICHOLS | Herb - CSSE VMS SUPPORT at ZK | Mon May 08 1989 13:43 | 5 |
| Your town may have on file a copy of the leach field plan. Go that
route first.
My HUNCH is that 8"-12" is not a problem.
herb
|
193.703 | | TARKIN::VILLANI | | Mon May 08 1989 16:27 | 7 |
| You should be able to get an approx. depth of the D-box by knowing
how far under the surface the septic tank cover is. The pipe coming
from the house comes into the top of the tank on the other side
the pipe going to the D-box is about 6" below that. So if the cover
is say 12" below the surface the pipe to the d-box should be approx.
18". then everything from there is pitched down. You may have just
hit the top of the stone of the leach field.
|
193.704 | Why Surface Water? | POLAR::MACDONALD | | Mon May 08 1989 17:46 | 13 |
| I appreciate the input, I will check with the Township office for
old records and hope the installer followed the plan. In the mean-
time I am curious why my septic water is rising to the surface
in this plowed area. Is is because of poor drainage underneath and
I am providing an outlet, or in the worst case could my drainage
pipes be that close to the surface that the plow actually damaged
them??
If they were within 12 inches of the surface would I have freeze-up
in the Winter; temps drop to -25F here for several weeks and the
recommended depth for frost is 4 feet?
|
193.705 | its always warmer over the tank | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Tue May 09 1989 15:25 | 5 |
| I doubt freeze-ups would be a problem, because the water in the tank
will be warmer than the outside (snow would always melt over the tank
first.
Eric
|
193.217 | Yep, drainage system | GOSOX::RYAN | DECwindows Mail | Fri May 12 1989 13:34 | 21 |
| I went to the town hall, they said the highway department should
have maps. Went to the highway department and was laughed at when
I asked about maps of the storm drain system (guess there aren't
any), but one guy offered to stop by and take a look. He wasn't
positive, but thought it looked like drainage. Finally, we got
through to a member of the former owner's family and he confirmed
there is a drainage system under the yard, including the hole we
were concerned about, and a drain from the frog pond. It seems to
work pretty well (well, we haven't drained the pond yet, maybe
next weekend:-) - despite the fact that our yard is lower than both
the street and the neighboring yards, we had no puddling in the
recent heavy rain, except one small area which had been dug up
for the town sewage. At the height of the storm, I looked down
the storm drain nearest the street, there was a strong current
heading out to the road.
So, I've replaced the blocks that had fallen out and put the largest
piece of the cover back over the hole. Now all I need is a new
cover...
Thanks for all your help, Mike
|
193.706 | Leaching Field Bypass/Diversion | POLAR::MACDONALD | | Mon May 15 1989 11:29 | 10 |
| Thanks for the input so far; I have an additional question - while
I am working on my leaching field, how do/can I divert the output
from my septic/distribution tank(s). I can have it pumped, but this
will not last long with 4 adults and 2 little children in the house.
I would expect that diversion will be needed for several days to
one week.
Thanks,
Bernie
|
193.14 | How much for design and permit | VWBUG::SCHNEIDER | Joe Schneider | Thu Jun 01 1989 17:46 | 12 |
| I have just recently purchase some land around Worcester.
I bought it without, I know I shouldn't have, a septic design/permit.
The price of the property was adjusted for the lack of septic permit
however.
Now I'm in the middle of using a land engineer that is certified
but am wondering anyone else could give me their experiences with
how much the average spetic design costs.
Just the minumum to moderately hard design costs would help.
I hope I'm not paying too much now.
Thanks
|
193.15 | | CNTROL::STLAURENT | | Mon Jun 05 1989 14:25 | 20 |
| My perk/septic design was done last fall it cost $100 civil eng.
$100 backhoe oper.
$75 septic permit
$400 septic design
My perk rate was 10 minutes, this is middle of the road for my town
Oakham,MA. A friend just did his, its was 30 minutes the max allowed
by his town. My system installation cost $2600, his is estimated
at $15K.
My well is 350 ft deep with a 5.5 gal/min flow, again about middle
of the road. Cost ~ $2800. The well can be any where from 100' to
800', then it's time to start over. This is for drilling only you
still need a pump,trench and storeage tank.
This should give you a rough idea,
/Jim
|
193.16 | there is another important variable | MILRAT::HAMER | release your crease | Wed Jun 07 1989 20:21 | 21 |
| > My perk rate was 10 minutes, this is middle of the road for my town
> Oakham,MA. A friend just did his, its was 30 minutes the max allowed
> by his town. My system installation cost $2600, his is estimated
> at $15K.
I think the deep hole test will determine cost at least as much as
will the perk test. My land is beautiful stratified sand and gravel
and perked **under** 2 minutes. But, and this but haunts me every time
I look at my bank balance, the ground water was at 3.5' that spring.
The requirements were that the BOTTOM of the system be 4' above ground
water so my entire septic system is in fill. Fill approved by the
local board of health for septic systems cost me about $6.00 a yard.
The whole system ran about $28K. I say about because I had one guy do
all the site work,including driveway (>>400') and moving the top soil
hither and thither and the price was somewhat more than that.
This spring, the local conservation commission and BOH upped the
requirement to 7' above ground water, due to the dry spring. I would
have had a mountain rather than a foothill.
John H.
|
193.17 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Jun 08 1989 09:02 | 10 |
| > I think the deep hole test will determine cost at least as much as
> will the perk test.
More so, actually. The perk test determines the size of the field - in square
footage. The water table or ledge determines the depth. If you had a 30
minute perk rate, and the water table and ledge were deep enough, your system
would be very cheap because you would need no fill - just dig trenches and fill
them with gravel.
Paul
|
193.218 | Don't wait for emergency needed pumping | WORDS::NISKALA | Master of the 3 inch putt! | Thu Jul 27 1989 10:47 | 15 |
| Earlier this month I needed to get "emergency" pumping
of my septic tank, ie it was overflowing in the bathroom. I
knew it was time for its every_other_year pumping, but put it
off alittle too long. 2 years ago it cost $55 by Thompson Sewer
og Windham. This year my wife called Roto-Man and it was $225,
plus they ran a snake down the toilet to clean that plugged up
line. Also, the guy said our system doesn't seem to be leaching
properly and we'd need a new leach field. The house/system is
26 years old and he told us that leach fields are generally only
good for 18 years and we were lucky to last this long. They naturally
offered their "acid treatment" for $600, but that would only be
a temporary fix to cleaning the leach field. I've looked at other
replies and it looks like maybe some Rid-X may be all that is
needed, or at least try it to save $3K for a new field.
What say the septic guru's, do I need a new leach field?
|
193.219 | Not mine problem, but his. | MED::D_SMITH | | Thu Jul 27 1989 12:09 | 31 |
| We just moved into our house one year ago. The house is 26 years
old plus. Our leaching fields were redone along with most of the
other neighbors, except one. Who is right beside us and who's fields
or tanks??? are over flowing and coming into our yard.
We have a stream in the back yard that is flowing through a pipe
underground. During the rainy season, this pipe cannot handle the
load so the water flows on the surface. No biggy. I trenched it
and it flows right by the house. This only happens during very heavy
or long rains.
These past few muggy days though, I've been getting this ugly smell
from the corner of the yard, where the surface trench is, next to
the neighbor who has not updates his system. There was a small amount
of very smelly water just starting to flow in this trench, but only
gets a few feet before it is absorbed by the ground.
I mentioned it to my other neighbor and he said " that's been going
on for years now".
These neighbors don't seem very social so I would not want to approach
them about it, but I refuse to put up with this. I shouldn't have to
take.
Has anyone else had a problem like this? How can this be delt with.
I hate to be the only one who cares. Of course, I'm the only one
who has to smell it because it flow out of his yard, into mine and
into the ground.
What now?
|
193.220 | | MOOV01::S_JOHNSON | It's your dime, start talkin'. | Thu Jul 27 1989 12:49 | 8 |
| re <<< Note 832.76 by MED::D_SMITH >>>
Immediately call your town Board of Health, and inform them of the
situation. I believe that they are violating some health code by letting
sewage come to ground level. They'll probably force you neighbors to
correct the problem.
Steve
|
193.221 | Get info on your system | MRFLEX::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Thu Jul 27 1989 13:12 | 16 |
| re: .75 "do I need a new leach field?"
$225 sounds high, even including the toilet line snaking. (We were paying $25
per pump not too long ago.) Personally, that would put me off this roto-man
outfit. A second and third opinion shouldn't cost much.
Besides, your original problem might have been just the toilet line and not
a full tank - unless your "overflowing in the bathroom" was happening in the
lowest (vertically) drain in the house, in which case, yes, it sounds like
a full tank.
So, sure, try Rid-X or some such, while you're trying to figure out the
quality/life-span of your septic system. (Are you sure it's 26 years old?
Mightn't a previous owner have upgraded? From whomever installed it, can you
find out its size? type (field, chamber, whatever)? material? This info
should help determine its condition.)
|
193.222 | how large is the tank | 28032::DEHAHN | | Fri Jul 28 1989 09:35 | 7 |
|
I paid $125 for an acid treatment of my 35 year old septic system last
year, it worked great. $600 is outrageous, unless you have a 5,000
gallon tank or something.
CdH
|
193.223 | Where/what company was $125?? I'm in Salem, NH | WORDS::NISKALA | Master of the 3 inch putt! | Fri Jul 28 1989 11:51 | 8 |
| I've got a 1,000 gallon tank. Roto-Man is just extremely
expensive. Like I mentioned it was emergency case, I was working
at the Digital Seniors Classic when this happened, so wifey-poo
took the first place that would have someone over in an hour. I'm
looking elsewhere for the acid treatment, it should probably be
worth it. Thanks for replies.
Keith
|
193.224 | Who, me? Goffstown, NH | MRFLEX::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Fri Jul 28 1989 13:36 | 8 |
| > -< Where/what company was $125?? I'm in Salem, NH >-
Are you talking to me? I mentioned a $25 charge for pumping. This is, however:
1. dependent on my normally write-only memory, and
2. in Goffstown, NH - St. Onge Septic. Great guys. Our pump died once (the
pump from the tank to the leach field). It took him two weeks to try to get
it fixed (not his fault), and wound up getting us a new one. For those two
weeks, he pumped our tank every two/three days FREE. Just charged us for the
new pump.
|
193.225 | | 28032::DEHAHN | | Fri Jul 28 1989 14:24 | 6 |
|
My quote of $125 was last year and would not apply to you, as it was
from Berthiaume in Charlton, MA. I gave it as a reference only.
CdH
|
193.582 | LAWSUITS VS SEPTIC INSTALLERS | TEKTRM::REITH | Jim Reith DTN 235-8459 HANNAH::REITH | Mon Aug 07 1989 09:44 | 8 |
| The Health department in Sturbridge MA sued a general contractor there about a
series of homes he built where he filled perk test holes with sand to get them
to pass. All of these septics failed 1-2 years later and the people have been
the talk of the area and can't resell the houses. Seems the ground in that area
won't perk so they can't even install a good system. No town sewerage, existing
homes with people in them...
A real mess and still in the courts
|
193.583 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Aug 08 1989 10:15 | 9 |
|
I've heard of a case in Nashua where a contractor built a bunch
of homes and in doing so the water table shifted. When it shifted
a group of homes right next to the contractors homes septic systems
didn't work very well anymore, and there was even flooding. When
Nausha planning board granted the permits for the homes they never
considered the water tables.
Mike
|
193.584 | Contact the Board of Health | SDEVAX::STARR | | Tue Aug 08 1989 13:18 | 27 |
|
In Massachussetts, a town's Board of Health is the agency legally responsible
for septic systems.
I asked my town's Health Agent what was the right thing to do in this
situation. Her response was:
1. Ask the installer to fix the system.
2. If the installer refuses to take any action, contact your town's Board of
Health.
3. The Board of Health will inspect your system and try to determine the cause
of the failure and if the failure was due to improper installation, or some
other cause. The Board of Health should also have a copy of the septic
system plan and they can verify if the system was installed according to the
plan.
4. If the failure was due to improper installation, the Board of Health can
order the installer to fix it. Their leverage with the installer is that
they can revoke the installer's license to do septic work in the town.
Good Luck,
John
|
193.226 | Preventative maintainence for a leach field? | AISG::ALIZIO | | Fri Aug 18 1989 16:15 | 25 |
|
I just went through a whole series of home inspections in conjunction
with Homequity, who is one of Digital's 3rd party home buyers. One
of these inspections was for the septic system. It passed okay, but
the guy who did it told my wife that our leach field probably has
2-3 years life in it. We have lived in this house since it was new
(13 years ago) and have never had septic problems. We have the tank
pumped out every 3-4 years. My question is, how can this guy predict
the failure of the leach field just by digging a couple of test holes,
maybe a foot or so deep? And if he is right, is there anything I can
do now to avoid the expense of replacing my leach field. I saw some
references to an acid treatment in some prior notes. Is this a fix,
or would I just be prolonging the inevitable? I saw RID-X mentioned
somewhere too, but I thought that was just to increase the bacteria
count in your septic tank so that it would function properly. Would
it stop a leach field from clogging?
I'm not in a panic about this, but I'd like to know if there's
something that can be done now in order to avoid an emergency
situation.
Thanks,
Paul
|
193.227 | How'd he do it ? | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Wed Aug 23 1989 16:58 | 12 |
|
re .83
I'd be real interested in how he did that test. I don't have
any problems but it would be good to know for future ref.
thanks
|
193.228 | How long a hose does honey truck usually have? | STAR::BECK | The question is - 2B or D4? | Wed Aug 23 1989 18:45 | 5 |
| Quick question on honey trucks. How long a hose do they generally have?
Does this vary? In other words, if your septic tank isn't very close
to the driveway, do you get honey truck ruts in your lawn?
I'm talking about between 100-150 feet.
|
193.229 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Week 7: Final inspection (but still more to do) | Wed Aug 23 1989 20:16 | 14 |
| My understanding about test holes in leach fields is this. If you poke
a test hole (one inch diameter sampling tube), and the soil below the
surface is quite wet, then that's an indication that the leach field is
no longer draining properly. I'm not sure how this interacts with
recent use of the leach field. Perhaps you have to refrain from
flushing toilets and running water for some time period beforehand.
Regardless, the concept makes sense to me.
I know of one person who had this done before buying his house. If I
had known about it, we would have had it done, too. Instead, we wound
up paying to pump the tank, checking the flow in and out of the tank
as part of the process.
Gary
|
193.230 | Does this smell as badly as I think? | CSSE::SALINO | Wherever you go, there you are. | Tue Aug 29 1989 10:18 | 61 |
| Here is my predicament:
One of the leaching pits in my system first failed when our house
was less than 3 years old (last fall). The system is comprised of
a 1K gallon septic tank and two, 2' leaching pits (I believe this
refers to their depth, yes?). This is for a 3 bedroom house occupied
by two adults and a 4 year-old.
I had the system pumped at that time and the problem seemed to "dry
up" over our dry winter. This spring, the problem came back with a
vengeance. One load of laundry and there is water coming out of the
ground at one of the pits. I called in the service co. again. They
pumped the system and told me to get a hold of the "as-built" plan, the
proposed plan, and the perc results and certification. We arranged
for them to come back in a few weeks to see how things were coming along.
In the interim, I discovered that no as-built plan had ever been filed
by the installer. All of the other documents were available. A call to
the installation contractor got me what I expected... no where. (Inci-
dentally, we discovered there are no as-built plans on file for our
little development of 12 homes - all with the same contractor). During
those few weeks the problem "resurfaced," so when the service co. came
back, we uncovered both of the leaching pits after a lot of trial-and-
error type searching and we discovered no blockage to the second pit - it
is working fine. At that time, the service co. roughed-up an as-built
plan for me.
When you compare the roughed up "as-built" with the "proposed," you can
see that the system was actually installed at the opposite end of the
back of the house from what was proposed so that the installed leaching
pits are about 50-60' from where the proposed plan shows them. The
tested perc rate was 7 minutes, which I'm told is pretty good, but I
have no idea what the rate is where the pits actually are located.
At this point, the quality of the installation itself is not in ques-
tion, only its location. I'm in the process of getting an estimate
to uncover the system and check the quality of installation and it
appears that just detecting if there is a problem with installation is
an expensive matter in and of itself.
Now the interesting stuff.... the original inspector for the Board of
Heath (town of Franklin, Ma.) is deceased. The guy I'm talking to is
cooperative in giving advice on how I can solve this problem at my own
expense - get a permit, call in a contractor for a new perc test, add a
leaching pit, etc. He totally avoids any discussion of the potential
liability of the installer, or where the B of H was when the system was
installed at variance with the plan, or the fact that no as-built is on
file. I should also mention that I've learned that the deceased inspec-
tor for the B of H was the father of the installation contractor...
(Well, this *is* Mass., right? ;^)).
So, among my many questions... Does anyone know if the Town of Franklin
and/or its B of H bear any of the liability in this matter? Does the
installation contractor bear any liability? Should I just pay for the
new perc test and an additional leaching pit rather than fight city hall?
Or, should my attorney start piling up "billable time?"
HELP!
Bob Salino
|
193.707 | Leach field depth question | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Aug 29 1989 11:51 | 17 |
| Like .0, I also have a leach field that is fairly near the surface. At
least the gravel is near the surface -- I've haven't dug for the pipes.
My question is, is there an optimal depth for the leaching pipes, or can
they be arbitrarily deep? I'd like to add soil over my leach field, and I
can't see how that would hurt their operation, but I want to ask for
opinions and experience first. Could this help the leach field?
By the way, I know I don't need any permits to do this, since as far as
my town is concerned, I don't even have a leach field. Never mind that
the contractor who put it is is willing to swear it was there and was
inspected -- they didn't keep the records, so it isn't there. So my
concern is solely with whether this would reduce the leaching effect,
rather than with the legality of burying a leach field.
Thanks,
Larry
|
193.708 | just add your Loam and seed | TRITON::FERREIRA | | Tue Aug 29 1989 13:03 | 16 |
| re.6
I don't know where you live but in Westford, Ma. my Engineer
said the important aspect is the elevation with respect to
the ground water table is what's really important, 4' minimum,
as well as a break-out area of 25' on each side of the field.
There's a minimum amount of stone/gravel that must cover the
system. If memory serves me correctly that's ~12", beyond that
you can build up with any suitable top soil for any depth. On
the other hand he recommended that be kept to a minimum to allow
better evaporation, thereby releaving the system of some of the
burden or leaching. That's also the opinion of the Installer that
we used. I tend to beleive and trust both of them and their
experience. I'm planning on covering my new system with 3"-5"
of loam then seed and hope for the best grass in town. ;^)
Frank
|
193.231 | House warranty? | WILKIE::OLOUGHLIN | | Tue Aug 29 1989 16:42 | 13 |
|
I help my friends put new systems in. I believe that the license
holder must provide a "as built" document/print at the time of the
final inspection. I will verify this tonight for you.
Anyway, call me Wednesday and I will give you all the background
I can dig up. (no pun) Sounds like shady dealings from what I've
read so far.
Rick. 264-7661
|
193.232 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Aug 30 1989 17:25 | 6 |
| > <<< Note 832.87 by CSSE::SALINO "Wherever you go, there you are." >>>
> -< Does this smell as badly as I think? >-
Your local building inspector may have a copy of the "as build"
plans and the approval documents. I think these are generally
required for occupancy approoval. Give him a call.
|
193.233 | Deceased but not forgotten...
| ASDS::SULLIVAN | There's a time and a place for spontaneity | Fri Sep 01 1989 18:06 | 14 |
| Still being in the middle of finalizing all the official documents (at GREAT
expense) for my system, I can tell you that my board of health (Nashoba Valley)
is very meticulous about these things.
I read your note and started salivating thinking about getting all that
money back. From what you have told me so far, I'd get a lawyer involved
right away. Sounds to me like you have a very solid case.
For a reasonably new system (since Title V in MA.) there is no excuse for
not having an "as-built" plan. And the little tid-bit about the
inspector/contractor relationship seems to solidify your position (can
you say Ethics Commission? :-))
Mark
|
193.234 | | CSSE::SALINO | | Tue Sep 05 1989 14:45 | 30 |
|
Much thanks to all who've responded.
re: .88 On the question of warranty, the general contractor does
not warranty a septic installation. I'm not sure about his agreement
(if any) with the sub. Also, the Board of Health will not guarantee
a system they've OK'd for any period of time whatsoever.
re: .89 We also tried the building inspector (in fact, the B of H
went this route for me) and while the inspector does need these doc-
uments to issue the occupancy certificate, he claims he turns them
over to the Board of Health after the OC is issued. (Why do I feel
like I'm standing in the wrong line at the Registry? ;^))
re: .90 Yes, my lawyer is now involved... talk about salivating!
re: .91 One pit is overflowing, one pit seems to be operating pro-
perly. We've located the D box but have not uncovered it sufficiently
at this point to determine if that is where the problem is. What I'm
wondering is if different slopes on the pipes out of the D box to the
pits could cause one of the pits to work overtime and fail? Or, can
the outlets from the D box be adjusted to compensate for this? We are
located on a hill and I suppose that a bad measurement could mean that
one of the pits was installed much deeper than the other.
I've got two engineers coming to look at the system this week.
Stay tuned.
Thanks again,
Bob
|
193.235 | There *may* be some justice! | CSSE::SALINO | | Fri Sep 08 1989 11:13 | 32 |
|
Well, the saga continues. As I mentioned, I had a few engineering
outfits take a look at the situation. One of the engineering groups
I called in was the group that did the original proposal and plan
for the house. Of the engineers that I called in, I was least pleased
with them, and my suspicions about them were confirmed when I learned
that the outfit is owned and operated by the Father-in-law of the
subcontractor!!!
So... what I've now found out is that the original plan/proposal was
done by the FATHER-IN-LAW of the contractor, and the perc test/final
Board of Health inspection being done by the now-deceased FATHER of the
contractor!!! By the way, estimates for a backhoe and engineer to dig
up the system, test, and draw up an as-built and a new plan for a new
system all ran around $1200. Don't know yet what it would cost to
rebuild a system, but I'm being told many thousands.
So... I placed a call to my state rep and the DEQE. In the same day,
the Town Manager and the head of the Board of Health contacted us and
started to work the situation. The head of the Board of Health (not
the inspector who was giving us a run-around) came to the house to look
things over. His official position is that the whole thing is "fishy,"
(i.e., All-in-the-Family, no as-built, system installed in the wrong
place), he doesn't like the layout of the system or the grading that
was done. He now wants the general- and the subcontractor to re-engineer
the entire system and reconstruct it at their cost! He believes all I
should pay for is the $65 permit and the $35 to have a B of H inspector
at the perc test! Right now, I guess I have a partial victory, but I'm
still holding my breath (pun intended).
Bob
|
193.236 | Septic system = dry well | TOOK::SCHLENER | | Thu Nov 09 1989 13:52 | 39 |
| I bought a house just 2 years ago. The owners had just pumped out the
septic tank and said everything was fine. I, being in the financial
bind of buying the house, figured that they were trustworthy and hoped
for the best.
I've always known that the land around the septic tank was moist,
great grass though, but never realized how saturated it was.
I wanted to pump the septic tank this fall. So 3 weeks ago I started
digging in the general area of where I knew the septic tank to be.
1st - after digging 1 foot, a bit of water was seeping into the hole.
After digging 1 1/2 feet, water was really coming in until the depth
was almost a foot deep. No smell though and no septic tank.
Well, I finally found the tank which was just to the side of the hole I
dug. I had it pumped out this past Saturday and lo and behold, the
septic people said I had a dry well and not a septic system.
In other words, I think I'm going against code right now.
What is the difference between a dry well and a septic system?
Do the previous owners have any responsibilities since they never
informed me that I had a dry well and not a septic tank.
Someone I know, had said that the previous owners are responsible for
2 years after selling the house. I have had the house exactly 2 years
on the 13th of this month.
The septic people basically said to keep having the dry well pumped
every 2 years and not to do anything to the system until it goes bad.
(which is just as well since I'm now starting to pay back the loan for
my new kitchen!).
I definitely can't afford to put a new system in. Would it help to dig
up the area around the tank to try to put more drainage in? Or should I
just wait until it gets so bad that I have to do something with the
system.
Needless to say, I'm not spreading the word about my septic system.
By the way, is there any grandfathering allowed for septic systems?
My well is grandfathered since it is a shallow well. I was wondering
about my septic system.
Cindy
|
193.237 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Thu Nov 09 1989 15:40 | 8 |
| Sounds like a cesspool, which is effectively a drywell for sewage
waste. Where I grew up, my parents had one before sewers were installed
in the street. I'm assuming that there isn't a holding tank somewhere
between the house and the "drywell" because that would be a different
matter (I think that's called a leaching tank).
Eric
|
193.238 | How are Septic systems inspected? | HANNAH::KUMAR | | Thu Nov 09 1989 16:20 | 13 |
| What does a septic inspection entail? To be more specific, the firm
hired (by Homequity) to inspect my septic system plan to conduct a
"stress test" - they will ensure that the holding tank is full, and
then continue to feed water at full capacity (of the waste discharge
pipe) for 20 minutes or so.
Sounds like a massively invasive procedure to me - or am I just biased
as I haven't heard of this before? Any precautions I should take?
To make things seem more fishy - when I spoke with the guy voicing my
reservations he said that this test saves Digital money as the other
alternative of pumping out and inspecting is more expensive.
|
193.239 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Digital Designs with PDF | Thu Nov 09 1989 16:53 | 17 |
| re: .96
I can believe it's cheaper. It's also better in some ways. The
pump-and-look method will tell you about the septic tank, but only a
little about the leach field. Normally, before pumping, you have
someone flush a few times, and the inspector checks to make sure that
the liquid leaves the septic tank reasonably (whatever that means).
My understanding of the method you're describing is that you try to
load the leach field with all this water, and then just stick a probe
into the field to remove a sample of dirt. Examining the sample should
indicate whether the leach field is draining properly. Too dry, and
there's a clog somewhere, preventing liquid from getting to the
leaching pipes. Too wet, and the leach field is exhausted, because it
can't eliminate the water adequately.
Gary
|
193.240 | drywell=cesspool | IAMOK::ALFORD | I'd rather be fishing | Fri Nov 10 1989 07:43 | 19 |
| re: back a few
I think Eric is right...you have a cesspool. At least that
was my situation. I thought it was a septic system when I moved
in as well, but when I put up an addition, and had to have
the system inspected, turned out to be a cesspool. And that meant
I had to have it dug up, and replaced by the appropriate septic...
big bucks I hadn't counted on spending...
Anyway, if I were you, I'd do just like the guy said...leave it.
Pump it regularly, and if you start having problems get it replaced.
Otherwise, you may move long before it dies. As for grandfathering..
that's the way it was in my town (billerica), so I doubt you are
breaking any laws.
just my 2 cents
deb
|
193.241 | thanks for the septic education | TOOK::SCHLENER | | Fri Nov 10 1989 14:58 | 9 |
| Thanks for giving my drywell a name. When people mentioned cesspools it
dawned on me that is what my parents had before town sewage. I suppose
that this was a septic method prior to using tanks and leach fields?
Also, other than digging up the area around the cesspool and attempting
to put in a leach field (time and money are low right now), is there
anything I can do for the saturated land around the cesspool?
Cindy
|
193.242 | DRYWELL and SEPTIC | VISE::LEVESQUE | Never ever enough | Fri Nov 10 1989 15:53 | 14 |
|
Are we really sure here that this a cesspool and not a DRYwell.
Maybe you had your drywell pumped?? How many discharge pipes are
there in the basement. Big Black pipes leading out the foundation
toward your drywell/cesspool. If there are two then you might have
a septic system and drywell. This a commonn setup for houses of the
1950 vintage. Anyways... what made me think this was you stated the
water didn't stink when digging. I'd have to say that septic waste
would give off a noticeable odor. On the other hand a drywell with
just washer discharge wouldn't smell so bad, maybe more like TIDE.
BAL
|
193.243 | Grass is greener.... | TOOK::SCHLENER | | Mon Nov 13 1989 09:54 | 7 |
| this is definitely the septic tank/cesspool. The pipe in the basement
goes out in the direction of the cesspool. Also, the previous owners
gave me the directions to the cesspool.
I'm not sure why it didn't smell. However, the grass is extremely green
around that area.
Cindy
|
193.585 | Total Septic System Failure/Legal Recourse? | LUNER::KERBERT | | Tue Nov 14 1989 13:38 | 19 |
| I have a situation where I have a TOTAL failure of my septic system and
drainage pit (not leech field). I moved into my new house 3 weeks ago.
We realized that we had a major problem when a septic tank engineer
came over to pump and clean our tank on Wednesday ; Friday the tank was
overflowing. The septic tank engineer recommended a leech field
engineer to come over and assess damages. He has told us that our
system is ancient and that something like this does not happen over
night. My 4 questions are this:
Has anyone had a problem like this?
Does anyone know if we have recourse? Apparently we do, since our
realtor called the seller and the seller says they are willing to pay
up to a certain amount. (I am assuming that they should be totally
responsible for this).
And....Can anyone recommend a good leech field engineer in the
Lunenburg area? Who should I stay away from in this area?
Thanks for any advice/input,
Cathy (223-4015)
|
193.586 | Recommendations elsewhere, please. | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Tue Nov 14 1989 15:59 | 9 |
| You're welcome to discuss the questions "Has anyone had a problem like this?"
and "Do we have recourse?" here, but please put any recommendations in 2027.
To the author of .0: there are a couple of septic contractors in 2027 and 2015.
You'll probably get better response to your request for recommendations if you
post it (without all the details of your problem) in 2027.
DCL, moderator
|
193.587 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Digital Designs with PDF | Wed Nov 15 1989 11:20 | 15 |
| Now you know why you should pay to have the tank pump and inspected
before you buy the house.
If you have an engineer willing to testify that the system has been
like this for some time, and that the previous owners must have known
that there was a problem, and if the previous owners did not tell you
that you have a problem, then you have a good case. You should find
out how much it will cost to repair this to your satisfaction, and try
to get the sellers to pay the full amount.
The negotiations may be tricky. If the sellers had revealed this
before you made your offer, then the septic system becomes a negotiable
item; they had no obligation to repair it first. Since, apparently
they withheld this information, that puts an obligation on them.
However, you may be better off settling for a partial payment now than
|
193.588 | There's alot of money pumping waste... | WFOV12::KOEHLER | | Wed Nov 15 1989 11:44 | 13 |
| re. .2
Gary, I have a friend that pumps septic tanks and he makes more
that most MIT grads...
Back to the subject: What if the pervious owners really didn't know
the system was bad, can they really be made to pay? Sometimes when
new owners change the "use habits" of a system it may fail. Something
like buying an older car that was only used it on Sundays
for a trip to church. Than you drive it to commute 25 miles a day
and discover that you can follow your route back home by the blue
smoke it belched on your morning trip.
Jim
|
193.589 | Check on past records. | TYCOBB::C_DENOPOULOS | No more Mr. Nice guy! | Wed Nov 15 1989 12:05 | 9 |
| re: .3 He said he moved in 3 weeks ago so I don't think "use habits'
would be the problem. I think what I would do is go thru the yellow
pages, looking up local pumping services, and see if they keep records
of pumpings. Ask if they can go thru for, say, the last year or
if they will let you go thru looking for the previous owners name
or for that address. If he's pumped more than once in the last
year, you got him.
Chris D.
|
193.590 | Deceptive Owner/Realtor | LUNER::KERBERT | | Thu Nov 16 1989 10:38 | 28 |
| As far as the "use habits" goes, that is a non-issue. We have spoken to
all of the septic tank outfits in the area and surrounding areas and
they have all stated the same thing: This problem does not happen
overnight. It takes years. Because of the total failure (water is going
to the septic tank and no further), the previous owner had to know
about it. We have found out since then that they did not use their
water at all during the last couple of months.
The reason that we did not have it pumped for our home inspection is
that they gave us a letter stating that it had been pumped in March,
1989. (6 months ago) Our home inspector accepted this and said there
shouldn't be a need for this to be done again.
The bottom line here is that the previous owners have agreed to pay for
it (and you know what I am assuming!) ... We found out that not only is
the seller at fault here; so is the listing realtor AND the home
inspector for allowing the letter and not insisting this be done.
There was a previous deal that fell thru on this house and we have been
in touch with the people who wanted the house but didn't get it.
They told us that when they wanted to have the tank pumped, the seller
and realtor refused to let them do so.
Sounds pretty fishy to me! Anyway, I am all set. They have agreed to
pay and I will have a new system tomorrow.
My husband's father is a plumber (in the business for 45 yrs.), so we
know the proper usage of septic systems. ie: Don't use colored tissue
and throw it in the toilet, etc.
Thanks for all of the advice/information. I appreciate it!
If there ever is a next time, I won't hesitate to have something like
this checked out thoroughly.
|
193.591 | whatta mess | ISLNDS::BELKIN | 6/*/74! | Thu Nov 16 1989 11:32 | 11 |
|
On a similar note, :-), I read an article in the business section
of yesterday's Boston Globe about septic system problems at the
Sherbourne (sp?) Village condo complex in Tyngsboro.
Its 96 units, and the septic system failed s few years ago.
The condo assoc. is spending 10K a WEEK pumping it! They can't
keep pumping it, and have enough $$$ to fix the system (500K-1M S)
so they are requesting the condo dwellers to MOVE OUT!
Josh
|
193.244 | New lot perc problems | VAXRT::HOLTORF | | Mon Mar 05 1990 16:01 | 28 |
| Here are my sewer/septic experiences and questions.
I grew up in a 200 yr old house with a failing septic
system. It overflowed mostly in the spring. In the summer the 25'
hand dug well was dry. No need to worry about overloading the
system then. We were under strict orders to "do it before we came
home".
When we got to High School the system was upgraded(approx.
1970). The Nashoba BoH Engineer had some gripe with the installation/
design. The result was the Town and NABoH couldn't come up with any
better design without causing a real hardship and what had been done
was approved and would not create a health hazard.
Ten tears ago my brother bought a plot from Dad and put in
his system about 1000' away. He had slow perc rates (two passing
required - one for primary, one for expansion(in case primary fails
in future). He is limited to a three bedroom house.
Two years ago my husband and I started testing for a lot
there too. Miserable failure. Engineers called it "Tupperware".
We discoverd the whole top of the knoll was a big mound of clay. The other
systems just happened to fall in the valley that wraps around the mound.
We tried just to one side of my brothers system and failed
again. Silty sand with fist sized rocks and 3' boulders. We have one
more spot (just the other side of his system) to try in this season.
We have been told it must perc or forget it, there is no
design, at any cost that is acceptable.
Anyone who's been thru this have any suggestion? Anybody
have "unusual" septic systems on new lots? How 'bout a good design
handbook for reference?
|
193.527 | Town Sewer backup - Roots | VAXRT::HOLTORF | | Mon Mar 05 1990 16:18 | 19 |
| My present house (65+yrs) has Town sewer. We have had several problems
in the last ten years.
Previous owners (25+yrs) allowed a Maple tree to flourish
directly over the pipe from the house to the main. About every 3yrs.
the flow starts to slow down. It actually backs up thru the overflow
pipe to the clothes washer in the celler. After the first major
overflow we became "sensitive" to this (starts with a small amount of
water and suds backing up) and now we call the DPW ASAP.
They come and snake it out.
The first time it happened we panicked. But the DPW told
us they own the pipe right up to the house. If they felt it necessary
they might take the tree down but it was their responsibility. If we
found we had to call them every year or more they would consider it.
They told us roots are a common problem and they had several residences
they got calls from approx. every 3-4 yrs.
They did suggest we increase the height of the overflow
from the clothes washer. We had a couple of false alarms when the
bubbles overflowed (changed detergent,overloaded machine).
It will be 4 yrs this spring. I'm keeping my eye on it.
|
193.245 | Cesspool Design? | VAXRT::HOLTORF | | Mon Mar 05 1990 17:05 | 46 |
| While trying to perc the lot mentioned in previous reply (832.102) we
have been looking at houses. We have seen a 100 yr. old house that
needs everything but we are considering it. The present owners do not
have the resources to fix anything.
The existing system was inspected several years ago when a
second morgage was acquired. The bank required a new pipe be installed
from the house to the system. I talked to the contractor (who is a
friend of my Father). He told us the existing system is the original
cesspool. I think it is about 6' x 6' and lined with fieldstone.
Whatever, his assesment of the situation is:
"With 2 adults and 2 teens in the house it appears to work now. The BoH
does not require existing systems be brought up to present regs unless
the system fails or you add bedrooms or bathrooms. If you eventually
are required to put in a new system the local and regional(Nashoba)
boards accept that their requirements must be "do-able". They are
very strict about approving new systems but can "adjust" for
existing residences. It can be expensive, but they won't condemn you
and throw you out. He said the worst case he had seen was no more than
$20,000.
Yes, that's alot of money. But we paln on getting a pro.
evaluation stating this in writing and will adjust any offer we make
accordingly. When this rears its ugly head we will be ready for it.
I have written to the Nashoba BoH asking for the results
of any testing that has been done on surrounding lots. I know
some of the neighbors and have been told that test results on lots close
by were poor. There are several new houses within 3/4 of a mile in the
last 10 yrs. Two of the houses (big $) had problems. One with ledge,
the system is shallow and has some enormous area for the leach field
(200'x200'). But it percs. The other house was built by the local
big $ developer for himself. He had major problems but somehow got
around them. $ and or ???.
The worst scenario the excavator/contractor could predict
would be that we might be required to install a tank system that would
need to be pumped every 3 mos. forever. Not necessarily expensive to
install but would cost over time. This would happen if the property
didn't perc at all. It would be safe health wise but unacceptable
for new construction.
After reading all the septic notes I can't believe the
problems with newer homes! This old place doesn't sound so bad. At
least I wouldn't be suprised if the system "crapped out"!
Any info on cesspool design? Anybody have one that works
all the time? Any body heard of a "tank" system?
Now, some questions and comments. What does a cesspool
design look like? Is it just a hole lined with block or stone , solids
collect at bottom and liquid leaches thru walls ? Or could there be
more to it?
|
193.246 | Raised mound septic system | DWOVAX::BEHNKE | We'll need a LARGER band-aid! | Tue Mar 06 1990 11:20 | 23 |
| re: -.2
I once was going to build on a lot of mostly clay, with a slow
perc rate. The solution was what was termed a "raised" mound septic
system. What it ammounted to was a large area (100 ft�) of gravel about
4 to 6 feet thick. In the middle of this gravel, is where the pipes
were to go, for the drain field. It was my understanding that this
allowed the effluent to be spread over a larger area than normal, and
thus could perc through the clay soil at an acceptable rate. (I
wondered if the effluent didn't also evaporate, somewhat). My problem
was that the field would be up hill from the house and that
necessitated a pump. As soon as you talk pump, you talk failures, and I
didn't like the idea. Nothing beats gravity. Let the sh*t flow by
itself!
Bottom line was about $11k in 1985; it was too rich for my blood. I
took my building plans to another location. HOWEVER, someone else built
there, and they are living there, with a grassy, landscaped area in
their back yard, that has to be the system I am talking about. Perhaps
this would work in your situation. If so, I'm sure the BoH would know
about it. Hope it helps some....
Eric
|
193.247 | Board of Health hints | VAXRT::HOLTORF | | Tue Mar 06 1990 13:05 | 25 |
| Just a note about a few things I have learned from lot testing
and looking at old houses.
In smaller towns the Town Board of Health should have the as-built-
plans in their files. If they don't try to find the name of the
engineering firm and call them for a copy. My brothers were on
file but I needed a copy and got them from the engineering firm.
Just before they filed for bankruptcy!
I have also been hearing rumors that some of the towns with no
town sewer are considering looking at overall SQ FT in a house
when setting capacity requirements for septic systems. The rational
I have heard is:
You may have only three bedrooms in your
house, but if it totals lots of SQ FT you could comfortably be
sleeping an army in your family room.
Health boards are allowed to protect public health
and they can only limit septic systems for this reason. I know some
towns are trying to evaluate what it might be like in the future if all
possible lots were developed. They are concerned that current regulations
are not enuf to protect water and provide future expansion.
If you are planning on building keep an eye on the
local BoH activities. Where it is health related, if you have not
built yet you may be required to live up to any changes, even if
your plan was approved. I believe the town I have been dealing with
has a clause in their regs that says until built thou shalt honor
any new regs.
|
193.718 | Reactivating a Dormant Spectic System | EBBV03::LATOUCHE | | Tue Mar 13 1990 15:48 | 14 |
| I've done a directory search and could not find a topic on how to
restart/activate a private sewerage system that has not been used for a
while.
My wife and I are planning to close on a house at the end of the month.
It is a foreclosure property. No one lived there over the past six
months and was winterized (glycol).
What steps/precautions should I take to reactivate the dormant system?
Thanks,
Jim LaTouche
|
193.719 | take a very close look first | CTD026::HOE | Sammy's almost 2 | Tue Mar 13 1990 16:00 | 12 |
| Jim,
Take a VERY close inspection of the house; under the house, in
the attic, etc. Under the house because here in Colorado, there
has been stories of thieves unsoldering copper pipes and selling
them. The houses were empty for a period of time. In the attic to
be sure that critters has not made homes there. BUT, can you kick
the critters in the middle of winter? 8}
Try to do all this before your walk-through as you take delivery.
cal
|
193.575 | I've used one | VAXRT::HOLTORF | | Thu Mar 15 1990 11:27 | 6 |
| There is a Clivus at one of the Audubons in Eastern Ma. Waltham? Maybe
Walpole? I found it rather drafty and cold on the "bottom". No odor.
Otherwise I was impressed with the idea, but I didn't have to clean it
out.
What do you do in a two storey house? I would think all toilets
would have to be in one area on the first floor.
|
193.720 | | SHARE::CALDERA | | Thu Mar 15 1990 16:50 | 32 |
| There should be nothing to it as long as the part that was not
winterized was drained. I have several places that are used only in
the summer and each spring we have to go through the routine.
Make sure all the little drain caps are put back on. It is a good idea
to get some exrtas because something eats them over the winter it never
fails.
Open all focets a little to let the air out as the pipes fill with
water.
The hot water will come out brown, but that will clear up shortly.
Have buckets ready, because if low points froze water is going to come
shooting out.
It is best if you have two people working it together, one person at
the main shutoff and one checking out the pipes throughout the house,
and when the checker finds a leak yell back to the shutoff person or
you will have a real flood by the time you get back to the shut off if
you are by yourself.
Another good idea is to have plumbing repair supplies on hand to fix
anything that may have cracked.
Other than that it is just like electricity just turn it on and it is
ready to go.
Good luck,
Paul
|
193.721 | Check the hardware stores | NITMOI::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Fri Mar 16 1990 10:13 | 6 |
| It pays to add some bacteria to the system.
RID-X is one brand that comes to mind. I remember helping a friend start up
cottage, and we found stuff (next to the RID-X) that was geared for jump-
starting a septic system. We also bought some RID-X to help it along for the
first few weeks.
|
193.248 | water bubbling up... | FSLENG::LEVESQUE | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Mon Mar 19 1990 09:25 | 14 |
| I don't know if it's just the time of the year, or if I have a problem.
The whole septic area is real soggy, and there is one spot where water
is actually bubbling up out of the ground. There's a septic smell and
I could see the water running when the washer drained or the toilet
was flushed.
I'm looking for other people's experiences regarding this.
Informational: The system is about a year and a half old.
Thanx for any inputs.
Ted
|
193.722 | USE IT! | BIZNIS::CADMUS | | Mon Mar 19 1990 11:05 | 8 |
|
Since the original question was in regard to a sewage system
re-activation- the answer is simple- just use it. The naturally
occuring bacteria in waste will get a septic system going all on it's
own.
|
193.249 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Say it, don't spray it! | Mon Mar 19 1990 12:19 | 18 |
| re .106
> The whole septic area is real soggy, and there is one spot where water
The septic tank area or the leach field area? and where exactly
in relation to these, is the water coming up from the ground?
> Informational: The system is about a year and a half old.
How long is/was your warrantee good for?
This looks like you have a problem with drainage, could be a clogged pipe,
defective leach field, etc.
Steve
|
193.250 | picture attempt | FSLENG::LEVESQUE | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Mon Mar 19 1990 14:24 | 19 |
| The leakage appears to be in the leach area. I'll try to draw a
bit, but no promises.
------------------------------
| |
| X |
------ | leach field |
tank | |----------| |
------ ------------------------------
|
|
V
from house
Not sure on the warranty, but we'll be looking for that
documentation soon. Town inspector is scheduled to look at it
tomorrow.
Ted
|
193.723 | WHEN CAN THE LEACHING FIELD BE REACTIVATED | LOOKUP::BARKER | BIENVENU CHEZ MOI | Mon Mar 19 1990 16:05 | 17 |
|
Now that this issue is brought up,it reminds me of a question that
has never been answered to my satisfaction. I am wondering what
happens when a new septic system is installed and then (after 20 years
or so) it too has to be replaced. Can the original leach field be
then re-utlized? Does time work to clear out the ground of whatever
builds up to break down the system?
Our system is 22 years old and fine (for now). We have it pumped out
every year religiously and are very careful what goes down there. We
have actually diverted our wash water away so that it doesn't become
saturated at any given time. We are septic-freaks!
Hope someone can answer this query!
|
193.251 | dry up baby, please! | QBUS::MULLINS | | Mon Mar 19 1990 16:53 | 19 |
| re: .105
I am also interested in your problem since I have the same exact
problem. I have checked into mine and the warranty is for one year.
my system is 2.5 years, has 260' of leach line and a 1100 gal septic
tank. I am wondering if its not the weather because I am located
in North Georgia where having torrential rains since the start of
this year. (we had 7" friday night). I am not noticing a smell though.
My question is if it is a problem does anyone suppose just adding
an extra 100' of line to the field would correct the problem. I
got the septic map from my local health problem and my problem appears
to be at the end of the existing 260' leach field. I have also got
estimates from $4.00 to $8.00/foot to have the line added. Maybe
I should just wait to see if I start getting a foul odor.
Thanks
Drew (who wishes my whole lawn was this plush!)
|
193.724 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Mon Mar 19 1990 18:14 | 6 |
| re .5:
I believe it is usually the field that goes when a septic system "dies". Tanks
can be pumped.
-Mike
|
193.725 | IT'S GETTING A LITTLE USED OUT THERE | LOOKUP::BARKER | BIENVENU CHEZ MOI | Tue Mar 20 1990 15:13 | 10 |
| Re: 6
Yes, I am aware of that. I think though that keeping the system
from overflowing into the leach field (by regular pumping) does
help to prolong the life of the system.
But can you or anyone answer my initial question: Can the former
leach field be used again when the most current area is used up?
|
193.726 | I think this your answer.... | OPUS::CLEMENCE | | Tue Mar 20 1990 23:07 | 23 |
| re: .7
I guess I'm a little confused.
The failures I have heard about are usually the leach field. Just
as .6 said. The only time I have heard of the septic tank failing is from
heavy trucks breaking the tank. This usually occurs with cement trucks
and not marking the septic tank location.
If you are asking this and you have only had one intial septic
leach field; the answer is no. You would either build a new leach field
in another spot in the yard or rebuild the old non-working leach field.
If you have gon and built a second leach field and wondering if the
first field will recover someday. I would guess not. The stuff that clogs it
works like clay and makes a pretty solid material. I don't know if after a
while, you might be able to break this up so as to reduce the cost of rebuilding
the old leach field. Might save some hauling away costs.
I hope I answered your question.
Bill
|
193.727 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Tue Mar 20 1990 23:27 | 14 |
| re .7:
I'm confused, too.
A septic system is very simple. You have a tank, the pipe that enters it,
and the leach field. A septic system failure is a failure of one or more
of these. The pipe leading in can be unplugged, or replaced if needed.
Besides needing pumping, the tank rarely fails, barring cement trucks
or similar. So if a system fails, and it's not one of the above, that leaves
the field. If this fails, you'll most likely have to replace it. I've heard
of treating the field with sulfuric acid or something, but supposedly that
only buys you a little time.
-Mike
|
193.728 | Septic schematic | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Wed Mar 21 1990 09:07 | 19 |
| Actually, the fields are often made up of multiple pipes comming off a
distribution box:
|------| |-----| |------------
| | | |---------|
| TANK |-------|D BOX|---------------------- FIELDS
| | | |---------|
|------| |-----| |------------
(Box sizes not to scale)
The solids should stay in the tank, while the liquid flows into the D
Box and is distributed to the individuals field pipes. If the tank
isn't breaking down solids fast enough (or the baffle has corroded),
solids can pass out of the tank and into the d box and fields, clogging
them.
Eric
|
193.729 | a slight water problem | TOOK::SCHLENER | | Thu Mar 22 1990 15:19 | 22 |
| What if you have a septic tank in which in the spring, water floats to
the top every time you flush the toilet? I'm not sure whether I really
DO have a leach field or just the septic tank (no pipes going out, I
think it's made out of cinder blocks which is letting out some
liquids).
Ever since I bought the house, the ground over the tank has been soft,
and after a rain it is REALLY moist (however, I'm not getting any smell
from the soil nor the water that rises from over the tank).
I seem to have the water problem only in the spring (that is the water
rising from the ground). There's only 1 person in the house and the
only thing that's hooked into the septic system in the bathroom.
By the signs that I've mentioned, do they imply that I only have a
septic tank? If so, is it possible to dig around the tank, add a
distibution center, bring in gravel and fill and Viola - a leach field?
(the tank is on the side of a hill so the land drops off quite a bit
afterwards)
Cindy
|
193.730 | from experience... | TLE::THORSTENSEN | | Thu Mar 22 1990 16:41 | 18 |
| Some older homes have a 'cesspool' rather than a septic tank. It's
a cistern made from stone or cement blocks - nothing more... no
leach field, no second tank. Waste water flows into it, the solids
settle, and the water runs out through the cracks.
If the solids have built up too much (ie, to above the level of the
ground water - or worse...), then just getting it pumped will fix
the problem. If the cracks are clogged with years of crud, then you
may need to have it pumped and give it a chemical treatment to dissolve
the stuff in the cracks.
There is a point of failure beyond which no amount of pumping or
chemicals can help it. At that point you've just got to get a new
one.
If you have problems with water bubbling up when you flush, bathe,
or whatever, then it may be just a matter of time before it bubles
up into your sink or basement. It's not something to ignore.
|
193.731 | not a DIY job | TLE::THORSTENSEN | | Thu Mar 22 1990 16:51 | 12 |
| Oh yeah... and no matter how simple it may sound to fix it
yourself - don't even think about it. Cesspools are usually quite
deep, really (I mean *really*) contaminated, and generally several
feet deep at the top. even the soil around them is bad...
Call a professional and have the job done right. Besides, there
are probably lots of codes and laws about who does what to septic
systems.
Also, fyi - if you install another septic system, it's a good idea
to get the old one filled in with crushed stone. I'd hate to think
of one collapsing.
|
193.732 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Thu Mar 22 1990 16:54 | 42 |
| > What if you have a septic tank in which in the spring, water floats to
> the top every time you flush the toilet? I'm not sure whether I really
> DO have a leach field or just the septic tank (no pipes going out, I
> think it's made out of cinder blocks which is letting out some
> liquids).
Hmm... How old is the house? If the tank does not have an outlet
it is, by definition, not a septic tank. What you _may_ have --
especially if its an older house -- is a "cess pool". (I think
thats the right term.) This is, essentially, just a big dry well.
It would have an earth bottom and/or many small outlets around the
sides and on the bottom. Basically its just a big filter that lets
the liquid seep out and keeps the solids in.
Now the bad news. If it overflows every time you flush or run
water it is almost certainly failed. Unfortunately you cannot
repair or replace it. If it cant be made to work by pumping it out
you will have to have a complete new septic system installed. This
means perk test, state and local permits/inspections, and a good
chunk of money -- probably in the $2-5000 range, although it could
be more depending on your site conditions.
The law in NH and I think elswhere does not permit re-building or
major repair of sub-standard systems -- which sounds like what you
might have. They must be brought up to current standards. i.e.,
build a new system to current standards.
The first thing you should do is get whatever it is pumped. Talk
to your neighbors to find out who does good, reasonably priced
septic service in your area. (Call me if you live in/around
Bedford/Goffstown, NH.) The person who pumps your tank can look at
you system and tell you more in 5 minutes that all the noters in
this file can tell you in 5 weeks. (Not to offend anyone, but this
sounds like something you have to be there and see it to be sure.)
BTW building a new leach field is usually cheaper that re-building
one that has failed. "Re-buidling" means digging up and hauling
away all the polluted stone/sand/soil, which is now "hazardous
waste". Then you have to haul in new material. If having your
system pumped once a year for ~$50-75 can keep it working it is
_WELL_ worth doing.
|
193.733 | | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Put the wet stuff on the red stuff | Thu Mar 22 1990 17:20 | 11 |
| It may also be possible that you leach field has failed or is reduced
in capacity. WHen it rains the ground is already water logged from
your waste water and there is no where for the rain water to go. Also
in the spring, water tables rise because of the heavy rains which
causes the ground to already be saturated with water and it cannot
accept additional water from your house via your waste system.
I agree with previous. Get a professional on site to determine if
cesspool or spectic system. They can offer an opinion on what is wrong
and then you can deciede what plan of action needs to be taken or
whether to bring in the town inspector for a second opinion.
|
193.734 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Fri Mar 23 1990 10:31 | 18 |
|
There's a lot of conflicting information in the last several relies. I
don't know about NH but MA.
Before you succumb to a new system, find out of you have a cesspool or
a septic system. If your cesspool has failed try acid treatment next.
Basically they pump the system dry and then dump 30 gallons of sulfuric
acid in and let it cook for a few days. It can buy you some time. If
this doesn't work, this does not necessarily mean you have to rip out
or fill the old cesspool and bring your system up to code. It depends
on the regulations. You may be grandfathered. What I've seen done is a
new ring is put in near the old one and a pipe connects the old
cesspool with the new one. This is a great deal less expensive than a
whole new system.
CdH
|
193.735 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Mar 23 1990 11:44 | 17 |
| re: << Note 3750.16 by STROKR::DEHAHN >>>
> ... You may be grandfathered. ..
If you have a cesspool I think you will find that you are
"grandfathered" only to the extent that the existing system can be
kept working. If it needs to be replaced or if it needs major
repair -- i.e. beyond what could be called "maintenance" -- there
is no grandfathering.
The reason for this is that cesspools are now recognized as a much
more dangerous health hazzard than septic tank / leach field
systems. "Hazzard" means both to the house's occupants and to the
community.
What was reasonable 50-100 years ago in rural areas is no longer
safe in todays crowded suburbs.
|
193.736 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | The Missing Betty Rubble Vitamins | Fri Mar 23 1990 12:01 | 15 |
|
If you have a well, be careful about the acid treatment, if the well and
cesspool are fairly close.
You need to get a professional in there to make an assessment of the
situation. If might be as simple as a clogged pipe, and the ROTO ROOTER MAN
can help. Or you might have to dig up your entire back yard to fix the
problem, without replacing the system.
Let us know what the pro has to say, and watch out for biased opinions,
of someone who wants to sell you a new system, who doesn't have proof that
it's required. So, you should get multiple opinions, and assessments before
you spend a dime.
|
193.252 | New Septic Tank "NOT FILLING" Leaks? | SOLAR1::FERREIRA | | Fri Apr 13 1990 07:07 | 22 |
| My situation is a little different but first I've used the directory/keywords
1111 and looked thru the majority of notes 832, 3587, even 2426. If there's a
better place feel free to move it.
I have a new septic system, (8 months) with a 1500 gal tank and oversize field.
Naturally it took us quite a while to fill the tank but did so and I had removed
the outlet cover to verify that all was flowing. Yup, whewww! That was in the
early December time frame. I'm getting ready to loam over and landscape and
gave it another look. There's a bit 8-10 inches of settlement on one side of
the tank and again on one end. The effluents are at least a foot below the
outlet. Before I go pushing panic buttons.....Is it possible that since we are
only a 3 person family and truely water conservers and winter airs are dryer
and the top of the tank is still exposed. That just maybe it's evaporating
faster than we are filling???? How about the negative side? Could the tank
have developed a crack from frost heaving etc. If there is a crack/leak, do I
have to come up with the out of pocket cash to repairs this or is there a
responsibilty on the part of the installer or tank manufacturer? Or do I just
fill in the depressions and go ahead with my landscaping and assume everything
is normal.
Thanks
Frank
|
193.253 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Apr 13 1990 12:28 | 20 |
| RE: 110 --
Even if you're EXTREMELY conservative in water use it seems very
unlikley that the amount of water used by 3 people for washing,
cooking, flushing, etc. would be able to evaporate from a closed
concrete tank. In other words, I think you are correct to suspect
a leak.
Sounds like this is a recent installation. Get the person who
installed it to take a look at it. If its less that a year old its
likely that there is some warantee coverage, so don't delay. Get
the builder or whomever you contracted with envolved.
My guess is that they will need to pump out and clean the tank to
take a look for damage. They might also want to dig around it
looking for leakage. It is also possible that the line leading
from your house to the tank is leaking.
Sounds like a potential mess, but be glad you found it before you
had your yard finished!
|
193.254 | Saturation = Water Show | ROCK::FRIEDMAN | | Fri Apr 13 1990 15:36 | 30 |
|
RE: .109
If your leaching field is really soggy, and you are seeing water
when you flush or run the sink, then the problem is most likely
that your field is being saturated with either ground or surface
water.
I have a 1.5 year old field that is uphill from the tank and requires
a pump. Last week after we had a heavy rain storm here in Ma, I
noticed that whenever the pump turned on, I had a little Walt Disney
World Water show in the yard. The town inspector felt that the problem
was due to the water level being higher than ever expected. Because I
live on a hill, he felt that the water was running down the hill and my
field, being so new, was just sucking up all that water. He says that
the only way to fix the problem was to install drainage ditches up hill
from the field to direct the ground and surface water away from that area.
In my case, I may have gotten lucky since in poking around the area,
we found an old surface drain that had filled with silt. I cleaned
the well part out, as well as the exit end of the outlet pipe. It really
hasn't rained since then, so I don't know if this will fix it, but I am
hoping.
In terms of your question, if the problem is saturation, more leaching
area will just mean more saturation.
Hope this helps,
Rick
|
193.255 | Who should pay for repairs? | SOLAR1::FERREIRA | | Tue Apr 17 1990 10:55 | 15 |
| RE:.110-.111
Thanks for the reply Charlie and Gail says hello. Anyway, I pulled
off the main cover this weekend and looked around with a flashlight. There
were no visible cracks or holes. There's a tell-tale ring at the level of
the bottom of the outlet pipe, which verifies that the tank had at one time
filled to that point. I guess the only thing I can do now is dig (by hand)
around the perimeter of the tank and see/smell for a wet spot or area. This
shouldn't be too much work since the tank was backfilled with nice soft sand
and clean gravel. Providing I do find a saturated area, who should hold the
responsibility for repairs or tank replacement? This system was installed
last August, (8 months ago). This is likely going to run into some big bucks.
The field is located only about 3-4ft from the side of the tank. Digging out
the tank is likely to cause some degree of cave-in/landslides and disrupt the
closest line of the field. Does anyone know who should bear the responsibility?
The location is in the town of Westford. We have our own Board of Health.
|
193.256 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Apr 17 1990 14:14 | 37 |
| Is the tank completely empty (or nearly so)? If so the break may
be in the bottom. You won't be able to see it without getting the
tank cleaned out. Again I suggest that you get hold of the builder
or installer. They can get a "honey-wagon" to flush up all the
crud and pump it clean. And why dig by hand? If the tank has to be
replaced you'll HAVE to use a back hoe, so hand digging seems like
a pointless waste of time.
Also, be aware that septic saturated soil is hazardous waste. If
you mess around in it be sure you practice good hygiene -- for you
person, your tools and your clothing. This stuff can cause serious
infections and illnesses.
For a tank thats less that a year old I would assume that the
installed (or the builder) would be responsible. Thats another
reason to contact them first; they may just do the entire repair
or replacement for free, saving you all the hassle. If they hedge
tell them you're going to talk to the building inspector and board
of health. If they want to continue building is Westford they'll
want to say on the good side of the inspector and the board.
One additional suggestion. I mentioned in an earlier reply that
you could have a break in the pipe leading from the house to the
septic tank. To check this, pull of the cover on the tank again,
then turn on two or three facets full blast. Now go look in the
tank. If little or no water is flowing into the tank you will know
that the problem is before the tank. Since this is MUCH easier
than digging I suggest you do it first. Its also much easier to
replace a pipe that the septic tank.
BTW get this taken care of as quickly as reasonable. Right now it
sounds like you're dumping untreated sewage into the ground
somewhere. This is almost certainly a violation of some law(s). If
you allow it to continue it could cause serious environmental
damage and require major cleanup costs. No, that isn't very
likely, but is is a real possibility and not something you'd want
to be held responsible for.
|
193.257 | Pumps in septic systems - problems ? | REGENT::BENDEL | | Tue Apr 17 1990 15:17 | 28 |
| I am going to install a septic system in a cabin I have in Maine,
but probably not until next spring/summer. A state approved engineer
has designed a system for this. This includes tank size, leaching
area, ....
The only concern that I have is that the leach area is uphill
(not steep, but at least a few feet, probably less than 6'), and
I believe that it will require a pumping system in the septic tank.
The engineer's design states that "pumping MAY be required), in other
words, he didn't measure the difference in grade.
If I do need a pump, some questions I have are:
How much do they increase the cost ?
How reliable are they ?
Is there a different septic tank where a pump is involved, or
will all tanks accept a pump ?
While this system will not be used on a constant basis, (vacations,etc)
I would like it to be reliable and usable year round. Will the pump
hold up better since it will only be used occasionally, or would it
be better off it it was going to be used more often ? I have heard one
person state that "pumps are nothing but trouble" ? Any opinions or
experiences ?
thanks for help
Steve
|
193.258 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Apr 17 1990 16:53 | 46 |
| My only direct experience is with septic pumps that we had in a
condominium where I used to live. These served ~90 units, so there
a little bit different than what you'll need for a small cabin,
but they were a major, ongoing maintenance headache. We had two
pumps and finally got to the point of buying a third one. (I think
it cost between $5000-10000) The only way we got ahead of things
was to replace one of the pumps each month with the "spare".
During the month the pump that was pulled got a thorough cleaning.
Next month it went back in to replace the third pump. So we rotate
the pumps with a two month duty cycle and one month cleaning and
backup.
From this experience I tend to agree that "pumps are nothing but
trouble". However I'd guess that home pumps are a bit easier to
live with.
In fact my biggest concern for "a cabin in Maine" would be the
electric supply. No electricity, no flush toilets. Beyond that be
VERY careful what goes down the drain. Although they're supposed
to be able to handle "sludge" the ones I've seen tend to clog up
on chunks of food or even wads of paper. If a dishcloth goes down
the drain you've had it. Don't even thing about flushing
disposable diapers, sanitary napkins, etc. (Sorry, but it isn't a
pleasant subject.)
So far as the type of septic tank, I don't think it matters. What
you DO need is a second, "holding" tank. This is where the pump
lives. The holding tank is located either in your basement or just
outside the cabin. Your normal drain system drains into the
holding tank by gravity. When the holding tank fills up the pump
is turned on to pump its contents up into the regular septic tank.
I would guess that intermittent use might be more troublesome than
every day use. My concern is that the holding tank and pump might
dry out, allowing sludge to harden. This could clog things up and
make a mess. Perhaps you would want to flush the holding tank with
clear water when you leave the cabin for a while.
If you do end up needing a pump, talk with the people who sell and
install it to be sure you know what preventive maintenance it
needs. After all, if you've gotta get in it up to your elbows
you'd like to do it on your schedule, not when it quits at 3:00 am
some January morning!
But if its possible to get you system working without a pump I'd
suggest that is what you should do.
|
193.259 | the same thing, only different | REGENT::BENDEL | | Tue Apr 17 1990 18:25 | 18 |
| Interesting stuff, and a different setup than I imagined. I have seen
the systems you are referring to, where the sewage is pumped into the
septic tank (or sewer line). What I had assumed (maybe incorrectly)
that I would be dealing with was somewaht different. I thought that
in my situation I would have the waste/drain flow directly into the
septic tank (~1000 gallon), which would reside just outside the cabin.
Then the water from the tank would be pumped uphill to the leaching
area. Is this an unreal configuration for a system ? If it is possible,
then I would only be pumping water, and hopefully would avoid the
problems caused by pumping actual solid waste and sludge. (If I've got
to pump the sh.. then believe me, I'll try real hard to avoid pumping)
I'm going to call some contractors in the area, and get some ideas and
estimates for the job, so I can plan what I need to do. If I can build
a leach field 6' under, and not pump, then I will.
Steve
|
193.260 | Thanks will post results | SOLAR1::FERREIRA | | Wed Apr 18 1990 09:26 | 16 |
| re.110,.114
The tank is a 1500gal. and is nearly full, within 8 inches of the outlet.
Good suggestion, I will try running the water and check the flow at the inlet
verifying the condition of the waste pipes. If that's in proper order, I'll
call the installer. He's one of the 'good-old-boys' in town and gets a lot
of referrals from the officials. The reason I'm considering digging by hand
is the last pipe in the leach field is within 2ft of one side of the tank. If
the installer saw signs of machine digging, he'ld likely relate the problem to
that. I do have a back-hoe but not a license. Thanks also for the hygiene
concerns, that's a very valid point. Since I will be callling the installer
I'll not need to worry about that for the moment anyway.
Thanks for the replies and I'll post the outcome for the general knowledge of
others.
Frank
|
193.261 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Apr 18 1990 14:35 | 26 |
| re: << Note 832.117 by REGENT::BENDEL >>>
> ... I thought that
> in my situation I would have the waste/drain flow directly into the
> septic tank (~1000 gallon), which would reside just outside the cabin.
> Then the water from the tank would be pumped uphill to the leaching
> area. ...
I've never heard of or seen such a setup. Of course I haven't
heard or or seen EVERYTHING, so I guess is _might_ be possible.
What is supposed to happen in the septic tank is that the solids
either sink or float and then, over time, most of them decompose
into liquid. Every so often you have the tank cleaned out to get
rid of whats left. Now what would happen if you put a pump in
there? Well, I don't think it would be LESS likely to clog up --
maybe more so. And its operation might upset the settling and
decomposing action. Worst of all, it might pump solids into the
leach field, which would quickly clog up the field.
(A septic tank has baffles that keep the inflow from stiring
things up too much. Another set of baffles keeps floating crud
away from the outlet to the leach field.)
In other words, I have doubts. But check with your engineer or
installer for the real truth.
|
193.262 | Sounds complicated | AKOV12::ANDREWS | | Wed Apr 18 1990 15:10 | 4 |
| Sounds like a lift station at the D-box.
Erick
|
193.263 | Pump Chamber after Septic tank | ROCK::FRIEDMAN | | Wed Apr 18 1990 17:32 | 19 |
| re: Note 832.117 by REGENT::BENDEL and .119.
I have a setup like the one mentioned. Essentially, the main drain
comes out of the house and goes into the septic tank. There everything
separates into its layers. From this there is a pipe that usually
would go to your leach field, but instead goes to a pump chamber. From
this chamber, the fluid is pumped up ( like 4-5 ft) to the leech field.
I do have a question about my particular setup.
One problem with this setup is that our field is saturating, ( see a
previous reply ) and the water keeps backing up into the pump chamber.
This causes the pump to keep turning on. I was considering installing
some kind of one way valve on the leech filed pipe to stop this. Has
anyone had any experience with one way valves in this type of setup?
thanks,
Rick
|
193.264 | The pump has adjustable floats | SMURF::AMBER | | Thu Apr 19 1990 10:37 | 15 |
| RE .121
A pump station (and I've only heard of these where they are after the
septic tank) with a check valve is a bad idea. The gray water trapped
in the line is likely to freeze. Also, and this is an installer's
opinion and not my own, the trapped water causes extra strain on the
pump as it "expects" to pump the water through an unrestricted line.
If I had your problem with the pump cycles, I'd show someone else that
wanted to learn how to adjust the floats in the pump chamber. If
available, check the design plan. It should include the number of
gallons of backflow. With that figure and pump station capacities,
the floats are pretty simple to adjust (although a much nicer job of
pointing to the adjusters rather than actually doing it).
|
193.265 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Thu Apr 19 1990 12:06 | 29 |
| re: << Note 832.121 by ROCK::FRIEDMAN >>>
> One problem with this setup is that our field is saturating,
If your leach field is saturating you need to replace/repair the
leach field. A check valve or any other type of fix is not an
option.
However, it may not be a leach field problem. As another reply
suggested, an adjustment to the float (or other control) that
operates the lift pump might be in order. Possibly the difference
between the high limit and the low limit is too little. The the
pump turns on at the high limit and runs until the level gets down
to the low limit. If this difference is LESS than the amount of
liquid that drains back when the pump stops you'll have a problem
like you describe.
But if the amount draining back is excessive because the field
isn't working then you will, as I said, have to fix the field
problem.
> ... From [the septic tank] there is a pipe that usually
> would go to your leach field, but instead goes to a pump chamber. ...
Well, thats a new one for me. Obviously it works. And it answers
my objection about having the pump in the septic tank itself. It
also seems it puts the pump in a kinder and gentler location where
I'd expect it to operate with less trouble. If this fits with the
physical restrictions of your site it sounds like the way to go,
provided you can't get away without a pump.
|
193.266 | problem identified, fix upcoming... | FSLENG::LEVESQUE | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Mon Apr 23 1990 13:42 | 18 |
| An engineering study I had performed last Friday indicated the field
was a complete failure (after 20 months). The entire field must be
removed, moved 10 feet downslope, and replaced.
Bottom line appears to be that the builder used "on-site materials"
rather than hauling cellar excavation material away and hauling in
appropriate materials for the leach field.
Builder has agreed to repair the problem. The engineer who did the
study indicated that this is a rarity (only 3 contractractors out of
about 100 problems he's checked in the past 3 years agreed to fix
without a court battle).
I end up losing 10 trees, my back yard for however long it takes to fix
and grow grass. I gain a slightly bigger yard, but big deal...what an
aggravation.
Ted
|
193.267 | ? | OASS::BURDEN_D | No! Your *other* right! | Mon Apr 23 1990 14:45 | 5 |
| Just out of curiosity, will they start building the new field first so
you can go about your daily lives (being able to flush and things like
that)?
Dave
|
193.268 | What are inspectors for? | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Apr 24 1990 00:01 | 6 |
| I've been told that the health inspector has to see that the leach field was
put in with the right depth of gravel or whatever is the required material.
Why didn't they catch it -- did they sign off without looking at it?
Just curious,
Larry
|
193.269 | | FSLENG::LEVESQUE | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Wed May 02 1990 13:31 | 15 |
| re: the last couple
The builder stated that the entire field could be removed and replaced
in a day. I'm a bit skeptical, but then again I'm not in that
business.
It's not a health inspector, but rather a building inspector.
Curiously, they are required to check the progress at various points
during the process, but one thing they don't have to verify is the
materials used to construct the field.
Hopefully, this time around, folks (including myself) will be paying a
bit more attention.
Ted
|
193.270 | | QUICKR::EASTLAND | | Sat May 05 1990 15:40 | 16 |
| I'm currently trying to do everything I can to perc a 1.5 acre area opf
land in Rockport, Mass. There is plenty of ledge (after all, it isn't
called Rockport for nothing) and a backhoe only managed to go down
about 18-24 inches before hitting rock. Now we are trying a large piece
of equipment at a cost of $1000 per day, in case any of the Ledge is
really Boulders. If that fails, I'm wondering if anyone knows whether
any kind of seismological survey could be done in case we're missiong
any spots, or whether that would be prohibitively exepensive. I admit
it sounds strange but the 3 lots into which the 1.5 acres is divided
are very desirable and are worth some considerable change even in
today's market. Failing that, I've heard that explosives aren't legal
for blasting away ledge for sewerage system installation, though it
seems to be quite the vogue for foundation work. Does anyone know where
the state and town regulations differ, and in general make any
suggestions. I do have a copy of the Mass laws on siting septic systems
but these seem pretty recondite.
|
193.592 | Also in Need of Legal Recourse | FSHQA1::JRUSSELL | | Tue May 08 1990 16:28 | 33 |
| We recently have been experiencing difficulties with our septic system.
I was hoping someone could provide advice on how we should proceed.
We live in a fairly new building, 3 years old. It is a building with
four townhouses in it and all four units share the same septic system.
For the first year and a half everything was fine. However, we've
had it emptied several times in the past year and we've been told it's
all full of water! The distribution box is full and when we have it pumped
water keeps pouring in. The guy filled his truck and could have come
back a second time.
We have had the Town Board of Health and the Engineering firm who
designed it over to look at it. Right now our front yard is all
dug up and our conclusion is that it was installed improperly.
No gravel seems to have been put in but rather the eight holding
tanks were installed in sub-soil.
We told the Board of Health that we wanted a second engineering opinion
and gave them the name of the company we were going to call. Someone
from the Board of Health went to that firm and told them not to get
involved! Can you believe this!
We've sent a certified letter to the Builders warning them that we will
be taking action on this.
Any other suggestions?
Judy
|
193.593 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed May 09 1990 13:23 | 44 |
| RE: << Note 3587.7 by FSHQA1::JRUSSELL >>>
I don't understand something.
> No gravel seems to have been put in but rather the eight holding
> tanks were installed in sub-soil.
Four town houses, One septic system and "eight holding tanks"?
This is something new to me. Could you offer a bit more
explanation? Might you be referring to the distribution lines in
the leach field? Eight of those would seem about right. Also, not
having proper gravel around the distribution lines could easily
cause them to become clogged. That is, these lines are perforated
with small holes that should allow the liquid from your system to
drain into the ground. These holes can become clogged with
mud/clay etc. if they aren't installed in a proper of gravel
and/or crushed stone. If they are clogged it would cause the
symptoms you describe.
As for the Board of Health telling your second engineering firm
not to get involved, I don't know. Do the Board and the original
engineering firm agree that the system was installed wrong?
If the Board and the original engineering agree then you already
have two opinions -- one from the Board and one from the
engineering firm which designed the system. Do you need another
opinion? Maybe the board feels that the problem is understood well
enough that another opinion is not called for. (They might even be
saving you money!)
If the Board and/or the original engineering firm don't agree with
you the what is/are their opinion(s)?
Unless you've done something strange an abusive to it, a properly
designed, properly installed septic system should NOT fail in 3
years. I would think that you should have some legal recourse
against the firm that designed it or the installer. (Or maybe
both?)
DISCLAIMER: I'm neither a civil engineer nor a lawyer, so probably
the best advice I can offer is this: If the people who designed
and installed you system don't act fairly quickly to correct the
problem you may want to hire a lawyer, rather than getting a
second engineering opinion.
|
193.594 | Continuing Investigation | FSHQA2::JRUSSELL | | Fri May 11 1990 16:07 | 18 |
| You are right about the distribution lines. All of this terminology
is new to me.
The original engineer and the Town have not come out and stated
for a fact that it was installed improperly. Everyone is being
very wishy washy and really leaving the burden of proof on us.
It's amazing what ties these contractors have. We called another
engineer yesterday and he said he wouldn't get involved because
he knows the installer.
We did talk to a lawyer and he said at this point we should continue
pursuing it with the engineers and get in writing what needs to
be done to fix the problem. Then present this to the builders,
original engineers and Town. If they don't respond, then the lawyer
will get involved.
|
193.271 | 10min or 15min perc? | MAY10::STOJDA | | Fri May 18 1990 13:29 | 37 |
| I don't remember seeing this discussed so here goes.
I am in the process of having the septice system some land I bought
redesigned (The current plan calls for the leaching fields to be
located dead center in the lot much to my dislike). After doing the
deep-hole tests (perc have not yet been done), there are two possible
locations for the leaching fields.
1. Locate fields on left front side of property. The perc rates
were estimated (quessed?) to be 10min. The problem with this
location is that the elevation is 6ft higher than were I will
be locating the house. This leaves two options. One, using
a pump or two, regrading using lots of fill (~200 yards).
2. Locate the fields on the right front side of the property where
the guesstimated per rates are 15min.
The engineer originally suggested going with the left side (better perc
rates but mucho fill). After some discussion (My opinion was that if
the leach fields for the right area would have to be larger to
accomodate the slower perc rates, should'nt the end result be the
same?), he has agreed with me on having the perc tests done on the
right side. Am I right? Is there any difference in a septic system
having a 10 or 15min perc???
To compicate matter, my town will only allow 4 perc test holes to be
done at one time. If the right side turns out to be really bad, I'll
have to pay for getting another test done and having the plan
redesigned.
Suggestions???
Thanks,
Mike
|
193.272 | | HKFINN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri May 18 1990 14:07 | 4 |
| I *think* the cutoff point for perks is 30 minutes, so 15 minutes
is still well within established limits. I doubt that the difference
between 10 and 15 minutes is worth worrying about. Go with the
easiest site to use. My opinion.
|
193.273 | DIY perc before official perc | FAIRWY::BROUILLET | Undeveloped photographic memory | Fri May 18 1990 14:12 | 7 |
| Get a copy of the code/laws for septic systems I recall something like
"Title 5" as part of the name of this... your local board of health or
library should be able to help. That will define how a perc test has
to be done. You could do your own perc testing first, just to see how
well each area percs.
I'd be wary of "guesstimated" perc rates.
|
193.274 | | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon May 21 1990 07:48 | 15 |
| The perc rate (and number of bedrooms) determines the size of the field. A
1000 sq ft field which required 2 feet of fill would probably be much cheaper
than a 700 sq ft field which required 6 feet of fill.
Perc both spots and do some rough calculations with the septic installer about
fill costs and field sizes. Of course your quick calculations won't be as
accurate as a fully designed plan, but if the monetary difference is not clear
from rough calculations then it doesn't make much difference anyway.
Cost isn't the only factor. I'd pay an extra $500-$1000 to have a system
without a pump, simply to not have to ever worry about the pump failing. The
visual and landscaping effects of the site choice will also have an effect,
although those usually only come into play if the prices are close.
Paul
|
193.275 | Pumping septic uphill- more on .115 | REGENT::BENDEL | | Thu May 31 1990 11:13 | 27 |
| continuation of .115, .116, and so on
I have discussed what I need with two differnet septic system
installers, and here is what I have found out.
The way the system is setup is that there is a "pump tank", which
is a septic tank with an extra chamber built-in to accomadate the
pump. This type of tank costs between $130 and $200 more, depending
on which contractor you listen too.
The pump (which only pumps water, not sewage), costs between $290
and $350, again depending on the contractor.
So, the total increase in cost for this type of system over a
conventional gravity drain is $420-$550. Both installers say that
if you buy a good pump (the best is $350), then the pump system
is trouble free, and that the pumps will last "years" (don't ask
how many).
I definitely am going to need this kind of system, and while it is more
expensive, it doesn't cost drastically more, and it doesn't sound like
the "constant trouble" system that I was worried it might be.
steve
|
193.276 | Tank plugged itself :-) | SOLAR1::FERREIRA | | Tue Jun 19 1990 13:08 | 17 |
| <.110 by SOLAR1::FERREIRA >
The long and short of the discussion in .110 and .118. I contacted
both the original installer and several other installers in my area
and the Board of Health. The all had the same answer. Wait a while
and see if it clogs itself before disrupting the system. I checked
the system again 2 weeks ago. It has again reached the appropriate
level and seems to be operating correctly. I can only assume it has
plugged itself. Though I cannot do a gallon for gallon comparison
of input/output, I have observed the outflow whilst someone else
flushed the toilets and also when the bathtub was drained after my
kids bath. My general observation is it is very close to 1:1. I guess
the moral is not to jump to conclusions and worries. Wait it out 'til
there's no other choice, (within healthful reason of course).
:-)
Frank
|
193.595 | How far to keep a well from the septic | AKOV12::MATUS | Networks Prod Mktg Mgr for GIA | Sun Jul 15 1990 22:51 | 39 |
| How far should my deep water well be from my septic tank and/or septic
outlet from my house? (I haven't seen this discussed elsewhere.)
My current well is running dry. So, I plan to drill a new one. Most
wells in my area are at least 500 feet. As a matter of fact, my next
door neighbor has one 1200 feet.
My well company, Skillings and Company, recommends that we try drilling
as far away from my current well and my neighbor's well as possible.
He figures that we would probably get a better well back there.
The problem is that the site they picked is 85 feet from the septic
outlet of my house and also 85 feet from the septic outlet of my
neighbors house. (By outlet, I mean the place where the septic leaves
my foundation into the underground pipes.) It is even closer to the
tank, but much much further away from the leaching field.
Now, the Town of Boxborough requires that a well be at least 100 feet
from the septic system. My driller says that most towns require only
50 feet and that he will ask for a variance from the Board of Health in
Boxborough for 85 feet.
What do you think?
- Is 100 feet a real minimum? Should I worry about 85 feet?
- What is the risk if the worst happens? As a matter of fact, what
is the worst that could happen and what is my risk?
By the way, the well would be up hill from my septic, but about level
with my neighbors'.
Any comments or advise would be appreciated. The B of H meeting is
Wednesday night and I'd like some thoughts before we request the
variance.
Thanks
Roger
|
193.596 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Sun Jul 15 1990 23:40 | 7 |
| I *think* that regulations in New York State is a well must be 50 feet from the
tank, and 100 feet from the leaching field. I'll have to ask my father to be
sure, he knows this stuff. Of course this doesn't help you, except give you an
idea what the rules elsewhere are. I'd personally recommend not skimping on
the distance from the leaching field myself.
-Mike
|
193.597 | | HKFINN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jul 16 1990 09:37 | 14 |
| Don't skimp. I had to drill a new well because the old well got
contaminated. I don't *know* it was from the septic, but when I
tested the water I kept getting coliform bacteria, even after
repeated attempts at chlorination. In that case, the well was
uphill, on the other side of the house, from the septic system.
It was probably about 50' or so. Now, it was an old well; the
casing might have cracked; the seal into the bedrock might have
gone; it might have been no good to begin with; it was only about
70' deep anyway; with a new well, you might be fine. But why take
a chance.
Notice that "uphill" is a rather meaningless concept when applied
to a well that's, say, 200' deep. The bottom of the well is "downhill"
from almost anything for quite a distance around.
|
193.598 | | GOBACK::FOX | | Mon Jul 16 1990 15:11 | 5 |
| Don't know if this applies to your septic design, but new ones require
a "backup" field. I would assume you'd want your new well the same
distance away from the backup area.
John
|
193.599 | Leeching field -- no problem | AKOV12::MATUS | Networks Prod Mktg Mgr for GIA | Mon Jul 16 1990 18:38 | 7 |
| The distance from the leeching field and the back-up is no problem. It
is actually several hundred feet away. The only issue is the septic
tank itself and the outlet from my house.
Your advice is welcome.
Roger
|
193.600 | Stow/MA regulations | HANNAH::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Tue Jul 17 1990 14:07 | 23 |
| I've been going through the process of getting our existing septic system
re-approved (in order to put on an addition).
The Stow regulations say wells must be 150' from the leaching area (that's the
perimiter of the gravel, not the pipes or tank). The leaching area must also
be 100' from any wetlands.
The Massachusetts regulations are 100' from the leaching area to a well and
50' to wetlands.
The state will grant variances if the local Board of Health approves it, and
it meets their approval too.
My septic system is at the intersection of 100' from mine and my neighbor's
wells and 50' from wetlands. The actual perimiter of the two leaching
chambers puts that 84' from my well, 94' from my neighbor's, and about
50' from the wetlands. Since this system was not originally approved
by the state, it now needs the variances for us to add a bedroom (even
though the net change in bedrooms is zero).
If I were you I would check out the regulations for your town berfore
doing any work.
--tom
|
193.601 | picky inspectors | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Jul 17 1990 17:27 | 18 |
| > Since this system was not originally approved
> by the state, it now needs the variances for us to add a bedroom (even
> though the net change in bedrooms is zero).
Good brief! Fortunately, it is not that way in Boylston. Although I have
a leach field, the town lists me as having a cesspool, because there are no
records of it. However, the previous owners added three bedrooms, and our
building inspector approved it, since their plans specified converting the
existing three bedrooms into a den, a study, and a laundry room. All our
inspector cared about was that it remained officially a 3 bedroom house.
Anyway, I think it's a good idea to not only check out the town regulations,
but to also get friendly with the inspectors and find out just exactly what
they are willing to go along with. To the first order, the regulations are
whatever they say they are.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
193.602 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Larix decidua, var. decify | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:39 | 23 |
| re: .5, .6
Sometimes you just need to choose your words carefully. If you start out by
saying that you're going to add a bedroom, they may not get to the point where
you say you're also going to delete a bedroom. Just rewording how you say
things, as in "we're going to change an existing bedroom into an X, and
add on a new bedroom to replace the one we eliminated" at least increases your
chances that they'll understand exactly what your doing, and why you think it is
reasonable.
Not that that guarantees anything. In Townsend, the rules are written to be
fail-safe, in the following sense. If a room could be used as a bedroom, and if
it isn't clearly some other type of room from a fixed list (living room,
dining room, etc., but probably not library), then it must be considered a
bedroom. The motivation for this is understandable, since it could be very
difficult to prevent some future owner from converting your new library or
den back into a bedroom. That doesn't make it seem any less unfair, though.
You can sometimes work with the board or building inspector on this, by
agreeing to remove closets from the old rooms, or add built-in furniture, or
otherwise make sure that it can't easily be converted back into a bedroom.
It helps if they're cooperative, but it can't hurt to ask.
Gary
|
193.603 | Bedrooms have closets; libraries and dens don't | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Jul 20 1990 17:03 | 12 |
| I have seen one case, several years ago, in which the
distinguishing characteristic of a "bedroom" was that it had one
or more closets. With no closet it could be called a "library" or
"den"; with a closet it was a bedroom.
The interesting thing is that this restricted the builder from
calling the house a "three bedroom home", even though it was
obvious that it could be used that way and probably would.
But the count of "bedrooms" as distinguished by closets was the
statistic that drove the septic system sizing. This was the reason
for the problem, as the area had marginal perk conditions.
|
193.604 | BofH Information | AKOV12::MATUS | Networks Prod Mktg Mgr for GIA | Mon Jul 23 1990 14:04 | 26 |
| Getting back to the base note .....
The Town of Boxborough tells me that the state standard is that the
well must be at least 50' from the closest point of the septic system.
That could either be the outlet from the house or the septic tank
itself.
Boxborough, and many towns served by the Nashoba Board of Health,
request a 100 foot requirement for the extra safety margin.
The issue is if the septic tank breaks. Apparently, you could be right
next to the tank with your well of you could guarantee that it would never
ever break. Of course, nobody can guarantee that, so the distance is a
safety factor to make sure that waste/bacteria doesn't enter your water
supply should the tank crack or a fitting fail. At least, they figure
that by the time the waste travelled 100 feet, you would notice it and
stop drinking from your well.
I decided to live with the 87-foot distance. That exceeds the state
requirements and doesn't seem to be a problem under reasonable
circumstances.
Thanks for the comments.
Roger
|
193.605 | suction lines must meet the minimum distance, too | XANADU::FLEISCHER | without vision the people perish (381-0899 ZKO3-2/T63) | Wed Jul 25 1990 10:38 | 11 |
| As has been noted above, the state standard for separation
between the well and septic system is 50'. In some towns
this is more; for example, in Groton this is 100'.
Also note that if the well is a shallow well and the pump is
a suction pump, the minimum distance applies to the entire
suction line as well as to the well itself. (This is in case
a leak develops in the suction line resulting in ground water
being sucked in.)
Bob
|
193.606 | Garbage disposer effects on septic system? | RUTLND::POLCARI | John Polcari,APO1/C11,289-1704 | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:05 | 9 |
|
I have a house that has a septic system , and I would like to put
in a garbage disposer. Would it be advisable for me to put one in, or
would it mess up my septic system?
People have told me that it is like adding another person to the
house.
Do I have to get it cleaned out more often?
|
193.607 | | VMSDEV::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:24 | 11 |
| I'm sure that there's something on this buried somewhere in some note, but I'm
not going to try to find it.
Have at it again here.
I've heard everything from "Don't do it, it will wreck your septic system" to
"It's actually GOOD for your septic system because it adds some of the right
sort of bacteria and food for them" and everything in between. So don't be
surprised if you don't get a consensus opinion.
Paul
|
193.608 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Chicago | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:35 | 8 |
| I've gotten by without a disposer my whole life. Since there is additional
risk (due to the non-consensus on the compatibility of disposers/septics)
why take the chance?
I personally rate garbage disposers equivalently with "trash compactors"
in terms of being worthwhile.
Steve
|
193.609 | | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Tue Sep 25 1990 13:38 | 6 |
|
Find a copy of your septic plan and read all the print on it. Mine
plan states its not for use with a disposal. It might be worthwhile
to check with your town's health inspector.
Wayne
|
193.610 | | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Tue Sep 25 1990 17:20 | 14 |
| From: Septic Systems "How they work and how to keep them working
in Vermont"
DON'T use a garbage grinder. Waste from garbage grinders will not
only fill your septic tank rapidly and require more frequent
pumping but will also float and increase the scum blanket
thickness. This will eventually spill into the effluent pipe and
clog the leaching system.
Do compost your garbage or put it in the trash.
Hope this helps.
daryll
|
193.611 | Depends on system size.. | PFSVAX::PETH | Critter kids | Wed Sep 26 1990 09:28 | 13 |
| I have a new house with a septic system and a garbage grinder. (trash
compactor too) When our system was being designed we told the officals
that we would have a disposer, so the system was sized with that in
mind. Instead of only having one tank it has two. One is 500 gal and
the other is 600 gal, this provides sufficent capacity for a four
bedroom house and the disposer. Of course if I am canning or making a
large quantity of garbage, I take it to the compost pile. It is real
handy to be able to grind up the little things. The trash compactor is
used for paper only and to smash plastic bottles for recylcing. No wet
garbage is put in it and we only empty it every 3-4 weeks. The two
together compliment each other.
Sandy
|
193.612 | Depends on how it's used | DDIF::FRIDAY | This space available for eminent domain | Wed Sep 26 1990 17:48 | 6 |
| I suspect that the impact of a disposal on a septic system
depends on how the disposal is used. For example, we don't
use ours as a general garbage disposal; all it's used for is
getting rid of the stuff that rinses off of plates and
cooking pots. We seldom put real garbage down it.
Rich
|
193.613 | doing without a while taught me I didn't need one | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Sep 26 1990 22:58 | 15 |
| Well, we always had one until we moved into a house with a septic system.
Now I can't remember what it was good for. We toss vegetable waste into
a plastic bowl with a lid, and dump it into the compost bin every few days.
Fat, bones, and so forth we drop into a plastic grocery bag or the like
(they collect inspite of our best efforts), tie the top shut and toss it
into a garbage bag that is emptied weekly. Anything that's too small or
too soft to scrape into the bag goes down our drain with no problems.
The only things we'd really have to use a disposall on shouldn't go
into our septic system anyway. I guess the moral of the story is that we
readjusted our lives not to need a disposall, and we spent the money
(including the more frequent cleanings of our septic tank) on things
that we need or enjoy a lot more.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
193.614 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:17 | 8 |
| -.1 Wow, great minds think alike.
Our garbage disposer broke about a week after we moved into our house
10 years ago. I took it out, replaced it with pipe and we've never
looked back. We had always had one before, but we have never missed
it. As far as procedure goes, we do everything exactly like -.1
described.
- Vick
|
193.615 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Larix decidua, var. decify | Thu Sep 27 1990 19:06 | 51 |
| re: .5
Those sizes you quote are too small for your purposes, at least by all the
standards I've seen for single tank systems.
The general capacity calculations go like this: The septic tank should be big
enough to hold 3 days worth of waste, since that's how long it takes for the
anaerobic bacteria in the tank to do their thing. Figure 55 gallons per person
per day (high, but it's a standard figure), two people per bedroom (again,
that's high, but septic systems are usually sized using a worst-case
assumption on house occupancy), and the result for the usual 3 bedroom house is
55 gal/day/person * 2 persons/bedroom * 3 bedrooms * 3 days = 990 gallons
which is why the typical 3 bedroom house has a 1000 gallon tank. Many towns,
including mine, require a minimum 3-bedroom design, even if you're only
building two bedrooms. For 4-bedrooms, they start to loosen up, since this
really is over-engineering, by setting the standard at 1200 or 1250, even
though the calculations come out to 1320 gallons.
There's a certain justification in designing high, because peak loads can be
more significant than average loads. Any time you feed water, with or
without waste, into the septic system at a rate faster than the tank can
process its waste, you run the risk of shoving solids (in suspension) out to
the leach field. For that reason, we try to spread out the load on the septic
system by doing some laundry during the week, instead of saving it all for the
weekends (for example).
Two-tank systems are relatively new. One book I've seen recommends them highly,
since they do a better job of processing waste. It's possible that having
a two-tank system allows you to use a lower total capacity (1100 gallons in
this case) than you'd need for a single tank, but I don't know for sure.
re: garbage disposals
I agree with the last few notes about garbage disposals - they don't do enough
to justify their costs, and they do put a load on the septic system. In
Townsend, our kitchen waste is picked up as a separate garbage pickup, to be
turned into pig food. (I'm glad I don't eat pork.)
Trash compactors are another story. If your trash is currently going to
a landfill, and if the landfill doesn't have an efficient compactor (as
opposed to a steamroller, or other inefficient compactor), then having your own
compactor really does reduce the volume of material that you're sending to
the landfill, and that's important. In some areas, this is reflecting in actual
costs. I have friends living in Berlin, MA who bought a compactor because their
(privately contracted) trash hauler charged by the bag. Presumably the hauler
pays tipping fees based on volume instead of weight (or perhaps it's just a
function of handling and truck capacity).
Gary
|
193.616 | practicality dictates | BANZAI::FISHER | Oakland swept, so what | Thu Oct 11 1990 09:46 | 9 |
| re: "Presumably the hauler
pays tipping fees based on volume instead of weight"
It's easier to count than to weigh. :-)
I hauled garbage for a year, actually rendering, supposedly we
weighed but really we counted and SWAG'd a weight.
ed
|
193.136 | Is there a minimum of soil required over clean-out? | EVETPU::DDIF::MCCARTHY | Finally a REAL editor on ULTRIX | Sat Dec 01 1990 17:41 | 9 |
|
Ok my new house has a similar problem as .0's. I smell sewage at ground level
when working in the back yard. I am VERY close to the clean-out and I think
this may be the problem. There is VERY little dirt over the clean out. I
would estimate at 2-6 inches of soil. Could the smell being coming from the
clean-out opening (cement)?
Brian
|
193.137 | my cement cleanouts aren't smelly | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Dec 13 1990 12:25 | 12 |
| My cleanouts are exposed. No noticable odor working around them.
I have had sewage odors occasionally, but not near the cleanouts --
mine came from one end of the leach field (next to the steep slope,
could be I get some leakage to the surface on the slope sometimes).
Does the sewage smell get noticably stronger as you approach the
cleanouts? Not to be gross, but have you tried laying down next
to the cleanouts? If that's the source of the odor, I think it
would get a *lot* stronger when you get right up next to them.
Like, overpowering. If it doesn't, it must be something else.
Larry
|
193.138 | | TOOK::KEEGAN | Peter Keegan | Fri Dec 14 1990 14:02 | 5 |
| I've always noticed a septic odor in my yard after I've had the tank pumped.
Sometimes the odor last for several months. I always assumed it was
probably caused by a deficiency of bacteria in the tank after pumping,
and the passage of time (and wastes) served to recharge the tank.
|
193.139 | new house... | EVETPU::IMPINK::mccarthy | Finally a REAL editor on ULTRIX | Fri Dec 14 1990 14:37 | 9 |
| re .22:
That may be the problem. This is a brand new home that was
sitting for about 2 months after the system was complete before the
tank saw any normal flow of -whatever-.
I will wait a few more months before complaining. I do think I
will add a little more soil over the clean-out. The wire handle is
almost sticking out of the ground.
Brian
|
193.140 | Take advantage of Christmas sales | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Fri Dec 14 1990 15:01 | 9 |
| Re .23
If you suspect that the problem may be a lack of hungry bugs, you
should be aware that you can buy a bottle of bugs at the corner
hardware store. For less than ten bucks, it couldn't hurt and it
might help.
pbm
|
193.141 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Larix decidua, var. decify | Mon Dec 17 1990 12:03 | 11 |
| re: .24
I've never seen any independent confirmatioon (i. e. from someone who doesn't
make money selling those alleged bugs, and has more than anecdotal evidence)
that those over-the-counter septic remedies work.
One piece of independent advice that I have seen is don't wash out the septic
tank when it's pumped. Leave the residue on the sides and bottom of the tank
as a starter for future use.
Gary
|
193.142 | Bad humor below | NATASH::MARCHETTI | | Mon Dec 17 1990 16:03 | 5 |
| re .25
Kinda like how you make yogurt. 8-)
Bob
|
193.277 | Drano down the drain?? | WONDER::BENTO | Rude Dog and the Dweebs | Sat Jan 05 1991 20:54 | 12 |
|
This seems like the right place for my question...
My kids, 8 and 4, use a mound of toothpaste when they brush.
The sink in the bathroom seem sto be getting plugged up with
probably the toothpaste. I'd like to use drano or something
similar to get rid of the toothpaste gob but i don't know
how safe it would be in a septic system.
Can anyone comment?
-TB
|
193.278 | Not Draino | KENT::KENT | Peter Kent - SASE, 223-1933 | Sun Jan 06 1991 12:58 | 15 |
| Draino is NOT good stuff. Not only is it bad for your septic system,
but also can melt the waste pipes if they are plastic. What you need
is to mechanically remove that gob of toothpaste with a snake or take
apart the trap to physically clean it. Draino is supposed to work on
organic things like hair, etc. I'm not sure toothpaste would be
dissolved by Draino, and it might even cause a reaction that could
bubble up dangerously in the sink. Draino is caustic soda with
aluminum chips to make it heat up. It can cause severe burns of the
skin and eyes. It should only be used, if at all, on systems that have
cast iron pipes. I don't like it's use at all because it's really
environmentally hazardous.
If the blockage is not too far down the drain, you might try a bottle
brush tied to a stiff piece of wire (like a coat hanger). I've done
that as well.
|
193.279 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Shhh... Mad Scientist at work... | Sun Jan 06 1991 20:16 | 17 |
| re .135:
Drano is no problem, as long as you follow directions and don't overdo it.
This means use COLD water if they state so. While I doubt it can get hot
enough to melt plastic (it can't get much hotter than the boiling point
of water) hot water can cause dangerous spattering. To be sure, read the
label to see if they say it's safe for septic systems. Both my can of lye
(active ingredient of Drano) and my can of (non-Drano) drain cleaner say it's
safe for septic systems and pipes. The drain cleaner specifically mentions
"safe for PVC pipes".
Lye is a chemical that while nasty when concentrated, it isn't a problem
when diluted enough, and will be neutralized by any acids. It won't be a
problem by the time it leaches from the leach field, especially with acid
rain.
-Mike
|
193.280 | Drano should work | SENIOR::IGNACHUCK | | Sun Jan 06 1991 21:06 | 12 |
| I've never had a problem with Drano and I have the same problem of
two kids who seem to delight in glomming up their bathroom with
toothpaste (seems to be a kind of revenge built into kids).
Besides, isn't Drano in a plastic bottle to begin with? I'm not
a rocket scientist (my mother made me give it up when I almost blew
my brother's head off with one of those water powered rockets years
ago) but if Drano doesn't eat through it's own container, it can't
affect PVC piping, can it? Follow the directions and you should
have no problem.
Frank
|
193.281 | whole lot a shakin' goin on | LYRIC::QUIRIY | Christine | Mon Jan 07 1991 00:03 | 5 |
|
Well, I'm no rocket scientist either, but I think dry Drano and wet
Drano are two different animals.
CQ
|
193.282 | | SITBUL::ALINSKAS | | Mon Jan 07 1991 09:10 | 8 |
| Well I'm no rocket scientist either, but what are you people talking about
when you say safe for your septic system. Will lye disintegrate the septic
tank itself? Maybe not. But... will it kill the bacteria that "work" in the
septic tank to break down the solids? I think so. The same goes for bleach
that's poored down with every load of laundry water. If your sink gets clogged
all the time isn't it easier to get your kids to use less toothpaste or use
a snake to clean the clog???
|
193.283 | A much safer way to clear a drain... | GOLF::BROUILLET | I (heart) my Ford Explorer | Mon Jan 07 1991 09:24 | 16 |
| ...is with water pressure. I'm pretty sure I saw the technique
somewhere in here, but can't recall where. All you have to do is stick
a garden hose in the drain, wrap a rag around the opening so water
won't spray back at you, and turn it on full blast. It helps to have a
shutoff at the end of the hose, so you can stop the water if the drain
doesn't clear right away. Once the clog clears, keep the water running
through the hose full force, and try to snake the hose down the pipe a
ways. This should completely clear out the drain lines. I've done
this a few times with *great* success.
You can buy an attachment for the end of the hose to help do this.
It's a rubber bladder that fills with water, to block the drain
opening, then blasts the pipes clear. I've found that wrapping a rag
around the hose accomplishes the same thing.
/Don
|
193.284 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Jan 07 1991 11:10 | 1 |
| Where did all the rocket scientists go?
|
193.285 | Caution - Low Tech solution follows | NATASH::MARCHETTI | | Mon Jan 07 1991 11:53 | 24 |
| This approach is pretty low tech, so it probably won't be very popular,
but here goes. It did work on the last two serious drain clogs I had.
Try a plunger. But do the following first.
1. Fill the sink with at least two inches of water.
2. Coat the rim of the plunger with a thin layer of Vaseline (or
generic equivalent.
3. Plug the little safety drain hole at the top of the sink with a wet
cloth.
4. As you place the plunger over the drain, angle it to allow as much
air as possible to escape from under the plunger.
5. Start the plunging motion and *keep at it*. It might take all of
30-60 seconds to clear the drain.
BTW, I am a rocket scientist 8-)
Bob
|
193.286 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Larix decidua, var. decify | Mon Jan 07 1991 13:30 | 17 |
| All of the literature I've read on septic systems says, in no uncertain terms,
that chemical drain cleaners are bad for the septic system, precisely because
they kill the bacteria needed for proper functioning of the system.
In the long run, using the plunger method described previously or a snake will
be cheaper, safer, and more reliable.
Gary
PS It is possible for the temperature to get significantly above the boiling
point of pure water. The boiling point of a solution of a chemical in water
(in this case, NaOH) is measurably higher than the boiling point of
distilled water. The solution you create when you pour a drain cleaner
containing lye into a sink trap is moderately concentrated. I don't know
whether it actually gets hot enough to melt the plastic, but it can get
hot enough to cause a heat burn, independently of any chemical burn. (In other
words, use caution touching the pipes after pouring Drano down the drain.)
|
193.287 | | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Jan 07 1991 15:55 | 3 |
| > Where did all the rocket scientists go?
Recent evidence would suggest ... not to NASA!
|
193.288 | Another rocket scientist's opionion | SNDPIT::SMITH | Smoking -> global warming! :+) | Mon Jan 07 1991 16:42 | 4 |
| Try hot water, it dissolves toothpaste nicely, and doesn't hurt your
septic tank... :+)
Willie
|
193.289 | Spaced out rocket scientist | CROW::MATTHES | half a bubble off plumb | Tue Jan 08 1991 08:27 | 11 |
| Speaking of rocket scientists ... someone posted a Dan Quayle calendar
published by the Dan Quayle quarterly report. On the first month is a
picture of Danny boy speaking to an astronaut in a space suit ...
"Mars is essentially in the same orbit ... somewhat the same distance
from the sun, which is very important. We have seen pictures where
there are canals, we believe, and water. If there is water, that means
there is oxygen. If oxygen, that means we can breathe."
The scary part of this story ... remember, the VP is in charge of the
space program. 'Oh no, Auntee Em...'
|
193.290 | There's no 'eye' in 'Drano' | STOKES::BARTLETT | | Tue Jan 08 1991 12:16 | 11 |
| Just one other point about Drano: I remember taking a course a
few years back on environmental safety and related topics, and
the instructor pointed out that Drano is the number 1 leading cause
of blindness in the US. People pour the stuff in, and then try
to peer down the drain to see if it's working. Some of the NaOH
will shoot out the drain as a result of all of the bubbling etc
that goes on.
Nasty stuff.
Greg B.
|
193.291 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jan 08 1991 14:32 | 4 |
| re Drano and blindness:
I'd be more likely to believe that it's the number one cause of *accidental*
blindness. Glaucoma's probably the number one cause of blindness.
|
193.292 | Rocket Scientist needed.... | WONDER::BENTO | Rude Dog and the Dweebs | Wed Jan 09 1991 12:10 | 11 |
|
Well, I've tried the "low-tech" approach, the "hot-water" approach,
the "water-blaster" approach and even the "Kids-stop-using-half-a-
tube-of-Aim-per-brushing!" approach. Still fills up the sink in a
manner of minutes! I'll take the trap apart and try snaking.
Maybe I'll get rid of the kids...
Thanks for the responses so far!
-Tony
|
193.293 | My problem and solution. | FSOA::DWILLIAMS | But words are things | Thu Jan 10 1991 08:52 | 19 |
| I had a recurring problem with one of our bathroom sinks not
draining properly. After trying a dozen solutions (all those presented
earlier) I took out the stopper assembly and found the problem was a build
up of crud on the 'leg' of the stopper.
--------------
\ /
\ /
| c | c | Crud build up was in the channels.
| r | r |
| u | u |
| d | d |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
\ /
\ /
\ /
|
193.294 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Jan 10 1991 10:09 | 3 |
| re .151:
Nice graphics. Sort of like an upside-down rocket. Are you a rocket scientist?
|
193.295 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Shhh... Mad Scientist at work... | Thu Jan 10 1991 14:08 | 7 |
| re .152:
>Nice graphics. Sort of like an upside-down rocket. Are you a rocket scientist?
No, a rocket scientist would probably know that the pointy end goes up.
-Mike
|
193.296 | | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Thu Jan 10 1991 15:18 | 3 |
| >>No, a rocket scientist would probably know that the pointy end goes up.
At least, they used to.
|
193.297 | Good desing but wrong end of the planet | WJOUSM::MAY | IT'S LIKE THE SAME, ONLY DIFFERENT! | Fri Jan 11 1991 12:31 | 8 |
| re 151
Actually you just may be a rocket Scientist,,, I would think that your
design would work quite well if fired from China!!!
Sorry ,, couldn't resist.
Bruce
|
193.617 | Lift system for groundwater in septic? | POBOX::GREEN | Gail | Fri Mar 22 1991 17:25 | 17 |
| I'm having problems with my septic tank filling up with ground water.
The groundwater used to go to the back of the property through a system
of drain tiles. The drain tile has broken up and is causing a blockage
at at least one point. We may have also contributed to the problem by
building a deck last year - and causing more water to be directed to
the septic tank area.
My septic guys tell me the solution is to put in a lift system. When
it fills it will pump water out through the septic system's
distribution box. This sounds somewhat reasonable, but the $2500 price
makes me want to look for other alternatives.
Could I reliably solve the problem with landscaping or redoing the
draintile (I have a large lot, so it would be no small undertaking) or
something else I'm not considering? Or is this a standard solution and
I should just swallow hard and get out my checkbook?
Thanks,
Gail
|
193.618 | more info needed... | ROYALT::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Mon Mar 25 1991 17:26 | 10 |
| RE: .0
Septic tanks are supposed to be full (of sewage). If you add a pump to it,
you would be defeating the purpose. Are you sure it's your septic *tank*
that's getting filled with groundwater? Also, I'm not sure what you mean
by groundwater-- this usually refers to water from the underground, at
the watertable. If this is the case, you will need not only a lift but
a different location for your leaching field. Possibly you mean surface
water?
--tom
|
193.619 | try regrading, etc. before buying a pump | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Mar 27 1991 16:23 | 15 |
| The world is full of people who know expensive solutions to problems.
Before spending $2500, I would try adjusting the grading in some fashion
to redirect surface water away from the septic system, if possible. Is
it possible to fix the blocked sections of the drainage tile? Can the
water that your deck sends toward the septic system be directed away
from the septic system? If you can't adjust ground level to direct
water away from your septic system, perhaps you could build a simple
landscape timber retaining wall to help direct water in a different
direction than the slope that leads to your septic system. It's hard to
be concrete without knowing more details about your lot, but IMHO, a
pump is the *last* resort when there are surface water problems.
It may be necessary, but everything else should be ruled out first.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
193.620 | its a messy job | KDCFS1::FRENCH | | Fri Apr 12 1991 18:02 | 15 |
| Intresting problem , the tank filling with ground water. This would
mean that the water table is at the height of your weeping bed .
In my area that is illegal , they do a perk test and examine the
soil for irom markings to see the normal high water mark and the
drainage capability of the soil.
The true fix would be to raise the weeping bed and backfill, then
the tank would be the wrong height so you would have to pump
up to it. Sounds real expensive .
A drainage ditch might lower the nearby water table if thats possible.
How did you verify the ground water is filling up the tank ?
John
|
193.621 | How would ground water get into a tank? | MEMIT::HAMER | don't confuse supply with demand | Wed Apr 17 1991 11:14 | 14 |
| How would ground water get into the tank? It is supposed to hold water
in! If it is holding it in, it is also keeping it out.
The tank is supposed to hold stuff coming out of the house, let the
little microbes transform the bad guck into less bad guck, and then have
the overflow run out the pipes into the leach field.
Unless water is backing up the distribution pipes or there is a crack
in the tank, I don't know how water would get in. If the tank seems to
be filled, it would seem to me because the leaching field is not
working as it should. If that is the case, $2500 would be a bargain,
but not for a pump!
John H.
|
193.622 | Sounds like the leaching field | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Wed Apr 17 1991 13:58 | 4 |
| That's right. It sounds to me as though the leaching field is
backing up into the tank. I would doubt that the water table is so
high that it's running off into the tank. A previous suggestion to
steer rain/runoff water away from the tank is also a good idea.
|
193.737 | Baking Soda ???? | ROYALT::PULSIFER | Doug @235-8128 | Fri Apr 19 1991 10:30 | 4 |
| My Leach field was leaking and I thought they are failing. I had not
had the tank pumped for 2 years. The Pumper person said that if I have
it pumped more often that the leak may stop. She also said that I may
want to have a Baking Soda treatment, has anyone heard of this ?
|
193.738 | | SKETCH::PETERSON | I know.., I said I was leaving. BUT...! | Fri Apr 26 1991 13:19 | 14 |
|
I just had my system pumped-after 6 years(!). The people who did
mine did an "Acid Treatment". (Perhaps they meant acid reduction ??)
You shouldn't get too woried about a little moisture-as long as
it's not flowing, and there is no odor. Odor means you should get it
pumped.
ALSO DON'T FORGET to use Rid-X, or some such product. Replacement/
recharge of the bacteria is done by me every 6 mo.
CP
|
193.542 | What does it mean if the grass dies? | HPSTEK::DHAGGIS | | Tue Jun 04 1991 13:38 | 3 |
| The grass over the septic tank, suddenly dried out.
Does it mean anything? Do I get a signal? Is it normal?
demetri
|
193.543 | | ULTNIX::taber | Position set by lassitude and loungetude | Tue Jun 04 1991 14:18 | 9 |
| Re: .14
Is this your first year in the house? Grass drying out is sometimes
very common if the dirt covering the tank is not too deep and it's
gotten very hot. If you've been living there for a while and this is
the first time you've ever seen it, it could signal something more
significant, though.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
193.84 | My vote: "pump". | ASD::DIGRAZIA | | Wed Jun 05 1991 15:08 | 18 |
|
I think I'll vote with the "pump it" crowd.
My system decided to back up a couple of days ago (on a weekday
morning, with nice weather! It missed its chance for a cold,
rainy, weekend evening! Hah!)
I estimate about 16 person-years of use (3*2 + 2*5), dishwasher,
clotheswasher, garbage disposer lightly used. Tank = 1000 gal.
The pumper expert said that toilet paper does not decompose in the
tank; it forms that black sludgy stuff.
Price = $70. I had dug up most of the cover. Suggestion: don't
rebury the cover; build a little brick house around it, and place
a 24" patio block at grade.
Regards, Robert
|
193.544 | I wouldn't think it's a septic problem | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Jun 13 1991 16:54 | 9 |
| There shouldn't be *anything* leaking out of your spetic tank -- the
system is designed to make stuff leak out in your leach field. If the
grass over the septic tank died, I would think that means that the dirt
over the septic tank is too shallow or too poor to support grass in hot
weather. Solution: add lots of organic matter, and/or make the soil
deeper. Now, if the grass over the leach field died, I'd get concerned.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
193.545 | water is being absorbed by cement | CPDW::PALUSES | | Fri Jun 14 1991 15:52 | 10 |
| re .14
I believe that if your septic tank is too close to the roots of your
grass, the moisture in the soil will pass into the pores of the cement,
thus drying out the grass. Peat moss, organic material, or a water
polymer (like 'water grabber') added to the soil above your tank should
help with water retention.
Bob
|
193.546 | Grass is up again | BIGMOE::DHAGGIS | | Wed Jul 03 1991 16:25 | 4 |
| Thank you all for your replies.
The guy who rents the house from me, added some soil, watered it more
often, and the grass came up again.
demetri
|
193.298 | Blasting costs in 1991? | NOVA::EASTLAND | | Fri Aug 23 1991 13:01 | 8 |
|
Does anyone have any recent experience as to cost per cubic yard for
rock blasting? I've been quoted $32 per yard to include drilling,
blasting and excavating including trucking out the rubble. This is up
in Rockport, Mass. Right now it looks like about 200-250 yards have to
be blasted, but we're probably going to expose the rock first to focus
in on that figure a little better.
|
193.299 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Aug 23 1991 14:11 | 8 |
| I have seen a "hydro-cracking" advertised as an alternative to
blasting. Might be cheaper.
Just curious....can another location be picked ? Also,is the 200-250
yards for the tank or does that include the leaching field too?
If so,doesn't sound like a place that has good drainage.
Marc H.
|
193.300 | | NOVA::EASTLAND | | Fri Aug 23 1991 14:23 | 11 |
|
No one has suggested hydro-cracking to me. I'll ask the engineer
involved. The location is the only place on the lot where a perc might
be viable - the rest is all ledge close to the surface. It's a basin
with good soil down about 12 feet. Trouble is runoff water gets into
the basin and is trapped, so the bottom lip (the ground slants downward
to the road) of the basin has to be blasted off to drop the water table
(at least that's the hope). We haven't gone much into the planning of
the septic system itself at this stage.
|
193.301 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Aug 23 1991 14:30 | 5 |
| Mass Rock Splitting in South Grafton is one place that I have heard of.
I listened to their presentation,but,never talked to them about price.
They use water pressure.
Marc H.
|
193.302 | | NOVA::EASTLAND | | Mon Aug 26 1991 14:16 | 5 |
|
Thanks Marc, I'll talk to the engineer about it. The other quotes are
coming in about the same anyway - around $30 a cu yard for drilling,
shooting and excavating it all out of there.
|
193.303 | Moving breather pipe on septic system? | AIMHI::MINUTI | | Thu Oct 17 1991 21:17 | 59 |
| Hi,
I have a question and need advise.
I presently have a 'chamber' septic system that is built up in the standard
mound/hill configuration. This system has one of those breather pipes
(don't know what its called), sticking out of the septic. You know the
ones I am talking about they look like an upside down J.
Just recently I expanded the size of my yard and because of that this breather
pipe is now more like in the middle of the yard rather than the edge where it
was before. Now I don't want to plant bushes, plants, etc.. in the middle of
the yard I really want the pipe not to be there. So I figure I have two
options.
1) the first option would be to simply dig up the pipe and cap it under te
ground. Now this is the quick and dirty approach but since its there I figure
It must have a reason. So first what is its purpose and is it recommended to
cap this beather pipe?
2) Second is too move the pipe. Now what I was thinking of doing is digging
up the pipe to where is enters the septic system and at that point put a
90 degree elbow in then running a pipe undergrond to the edge of the yard then
another 90 degree elbow pointing up and attach the original upside down J here.
This way I will still have air going to the system but is will just be down
a longer pipe. Will this work? is there a maximum distance I can go with
this approach?
Before After
------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
-------\ -------\
1 ----1 1 1 ----1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 -------------------- 1
1 1 1 ___________________1
1 1 1 1
--------1 1-------- --------1 1---------
1 1 1 1
1 SEPTIC SYSTEM 1 1 SEPTIC SYSTEM 1
1 1 1 1
1-----------------1 1------------------1
Let me say the septic system is 5 years old and has worked flawlessly for all
5 years. So I don't want to ruin a good thing, thats why I am asking questions
first. If it means taking a chance in making my system not work as good as it
does now or bushes around the pipe, bushes it will be. But if it won't hurt
the system I would like to do something with the pipe.
So what do you think?
- Dino -
|
193.304 | still looking for answer | AIMHI::MINUTI | | Tue Oct 22 1991 11:19 | 1 |
| Hi, can anyone out there help me with my question is .161 ?
|
193.305 | could be a blast... | RAGMOP::WALTERS | | Tue Oct 22 1991 11:42 | 13 |
|
This is *probably* a vent for methane and other gases and may also
be required as an anti-siphon (vacuum breaker) in case of flooding.
I would not recommend capping it.
You'll have to check local codes for relocating the pipe - there
may be some risk of forming gas pockets and you have to use
appropriate materials & pipe seals.
Regards,
Colin
|
193.306 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Tue Oct 22 1991 12:26 | 5 |
| If you want to put *something* in one end of your septic system
(sewage) you had better let the air out the other end (via the pipe).
If you cap that pipe you may have a very difficult time flushing
your toilets.
|
193.307 | why make extra work?? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Oct 23 1991 07:31 | 9 |
|
The vent stack should take care of any back pressure.......
How about putting one of thoes wooden wishing wells around
the pipe? Now you wont see the pipe and it will look like
you have an old well out back. Plant some flowers around it....
|
193.308 | Call your septic people | WRKSYS::SCHWARTZ | | Wed Oct 23 1991 08:38 | 9 |
|
....Or get somebody out that really knows those kind of systems
and have them advise you. It is there at that location for a purpose
and if you don't know what it is, you would be inviting BIG trouble
messing w/it. Call the people that take care of the system. If they
can't answer they can put you on to somebody who does and it doesn't
cost anything to talk. I am sure that it wasn't put there at that
location because somebody thought it would look nice to have a pipe
sticking out of the ground.;>)
|
193.309 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Wed Oct 23 1991 11:51 | 19 |
| re.165
<<< Note 832.165 by ELWOOD::DYMON >>>
-< why make extra work?? >-
>> The vent stack should take care of any back pressure.......
I disagree. The vent stack is there to relieve the pressure in the line
from the house to the septic tank. It makes it possible for all the
plumbing traps in the house to work properly.
The vent pipe off of the tank itself relieves pressure buildup
in the tank itself. Without it, the flow of material to the tank could
be slowed as air would be forced out the inflow pipe to get to the
vent stack. Slowing down the flow to the septic tank could result in
less than adequate movement of (*ahem!*) solid materials to the tank.
Bottom line, the pipe is there for a reason! Don't plug it.
|
193.310 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Wed Oct 23 1991 12:39 | 9 |
| The person asking the question isn't planning on plugging it, but extending
the vent to a less noticible location. I believe it's present since this is
some sort of aerobic (air using) system, opposed to the anaerobic process that
normal septic tanks use. If so, I can see no reason the pipe couldn't be
extended _as long as the extension is sloped so water from condensation can't
form a trap and block air flow_, but find out for sure what kind of system this
is, and find someone who knows such systems.
-Mike
|
193.311 | You have a pump on your septic system? | JUNCO::BOWNE | | Wed Oct 23 1991 13:59 | 28 |
|
I have one in my front yard too, as well as a sewage pumping
station inbetween my septic tank and the leach field. (Underground,
that is. The leach field ended up being uphill from the rest of the
septic as a result of numerous perc tests...) I questioned my home
inspector as to the pipe's purpose before I bought the house.
The way he explained it to me was that, in a NORMAL situation,
which means that it's all downhill from the house to the septic tank to
the leach field, the plumbing vent internal to the house does an
adequate job of venting the entire septic system, as one of the
earlier replies mentioned. In my case, however, a second high point
was created by the addition of the pumping station and the leach field.
It is this higher point which could and would trap air (actually become
under a vacuum, and probably end up sucking all kinds of wonderful ____
out into the leach field) if it were not properly vented. Hence the
addition of the beautiful white inverted J-pipe in the middle of the
front yard. I'm planning on simply landscaping around it to hide it.
DO NOT cap this line. Moving it may be acceptable. In agreement
with the other replies: you really should ask an expert on the subject
if you really want to re-route it. And if you also have a pump on your
system, plan on having that tank pumped at least every year or two.
Good preventive maintenance. (I know _I_ wouldn't want to be the one
replacing my pump!!!)
/TB
|
193.312 | | TOKLAS::feldman | Larix decidua, var. decify | Wed Oct 23 1991 14:01 | 21 |
| I thought the ventilation was for the leach field end, not the
septic tank.
The bacteria that work in the tank are anaerobic: no air. There shouldn't
be an air vent for the tank, nor should there be a build of pressure,
since the excess liquid ought to freely flow into the leach field.
The bacteria that work around the leach field are aerobic. They depend
on the air to work. If they don't have air, they don't work as well, the leach
field starts getting clogged, they get less air, they work even more poorly,
and so on. My local high school has several of these J's in their fields
scattered widely. I'd be surprised if they were for different septic tanks,
but it makes sense that they could be for different parts of the leach field.
Bottom line: get an expert opinion. Do you know who designed the system?
If not, I bet any engineering firm would be willing to give you the
quick answer for free (where the quick answer might be you need an expert,
or it's alwyas ok to move it so long as you maintain the connection, or
it's never possible).
Gary
|
193.313 | thanks and how about bacteria boost? | AIMHI::MINUTI | | Thu Oct 24 1991 17:59 | 29 |
| Thanks for all the answers.
To clear up a few things, the inverted J-pipe is NOT for my septic
tank, it is at the end of leach field.
I have now narrowed down my choices to
1) landscape around it
2) move it as I originally proposed
and be assured I will NOT cap it!
I guess I will give a good septic person a call and see what they say.
On a different note, I have not yet emptied my tank and according to
the originall designer I should theoretically NOT have to.
The bacteria in both the tank and the leach field should break down
the waste small enough so it can be processed via the leach field.
What I do is every six months I give my system boost by flushing down
the toilet a dose of bacteria. I do this because over time the
bacteria in the septic may die or decrease in numbers, this happens
alot due to the bleach, cleaners, etc.. that come from dishwashers, washing
machines, stuff poured down the sink... I have found this a very
helpfull and an easy thing to do and very inexpensive. You can pick up
the bacteria in places like AGWAY, FARM supply store, certian hardware
stores, etc..
Has anyone else out there gone a LONG period of time and not had there
tank emptied? Does anyone else put bacteria in there system to boost
its processing power?
|
193.314 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | DCU Meeting, see BEIRUT::DCU | Fri Oct 25 1991 09:31 | 16 |
|
I bought my house new in 1978. Had the tank pumped for the first time
this past April, and the distribution box to the leach fields inspected,
as part of an addition project. No problem.
When we were looking for a mortgage in 1978, we had a really nice chat
with a grandfatherly-type loan officer at Worker's Credit Union. At the
time, he was working on his 25th year on his septic system, without
pumping. We followed his advice: no colored paper, watch the harsh
chemicals, no food or grease, no garbage disposal. it works for us (two
adults, two children). Your effluent may vary.
Re "J" pipes: I've seen some attractively decorated as candy canes.
Works for at least a few months out of the year.
|
193.315 | Not so lucky | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Fri Oct 25 1991 12:00 | 7 |
| I've flushed some of that bacteria stuff down the toilet once a
month for the past five or so years and haven't been so lucky. We are
also very careful about what goes down the drain and into the septic
system. We *do* have a garbage disposal but are careful about what goes
into it. There are two adults and two kids (=> lots of laundry). I've
had to pump the tank every 2-3 years or risk backing up. Perhaps it's
the high-fiber diets...
|
193.316 | | KAHALA::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Fri Oct 25 1991 14:14 | 8 |
| I have had my house for 3.5 years and never pumped the tank. The previous owner
had not pumped it for probably 8 years, if at all. The laundry is drained to a
separate dry well, and not the septic. Everything else goes to the tank.
I would not pump the tank unless absolutely necessary. My parents only had to
pump the tank when our large family overpowered the system.
Ed..
|
193.317 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Sun Oct 27 1991 09:15 | 6 |
| >The laundry is drained to a
>separate dry well, and not the septic.
I didn't think this was technically allowed. What's involved, permit/
approval-wise, to create a system you describe?
John
|
193.318 | | TOKLAS::feldman | Larix decidua, var. decify | Sun Oct 27 1991 18:23 | 26 |
| re: .171
As I'm sure I've said before in this note (but it deserves repeating), I have
yet to see any independent, non-anecdotal confirmation of any of the
septic tank additives (Rid-X, bacteria, enzyme, whatever), other than
root killers (for tree roots interfering with the leach field). I've
seen and read a fair bit
of info from state agencies, extension services, independent researchers, and
while they may or may not have a bias against chemicals, they also have a bias
towards proper operation of septic systems. It seems to me that if any of
the additives worked, there'd be at least some independent study by some
college or research group to verify it.
re: .175
Rules for dry wells vary from area to area. I personally think they're
a fine idea. Contact your local board of health or building inspector for
details.
Chances are that if they're allowed at all, then they should be pretty easy
to do. There may be some requirements with respect to distance from
well, existing septic system, or wetlands, but I've never heard of any
cases where they needed engineering expertise of the sort that goes into
septic system design.
Gary
|
193.623 | Septic problem? | RANGER::DAVE | | Thu Jan 02 1992 11:20 | 11 |
| During the warmer spells we have had here (in the Boston area) after the
snowfalls, I have noticed a square patch of snow which has melted about
10' away from the house and directly above where the septic system
exits the house. The rest of the lawn was still covered with snow!
Now, is this normal or is this something I should worry about (the
house is about 3 months old)? Should I contact the builder???
Thanks in advance for all your input!
-SKD-
|
193.624 | Bare greound not a problem | IMBACQ::DUKE | | Thu Jan 02 1992 11:31 | 13 |
|
Not a problem. A lot of the liquid which goes into the
tank is warm (tub, dishes) plus the bacteria action in the
tank generates heat. Not at all uncommon that there is bare
ground over the tank.
Actually, if the system froze, it would be a major
problem. I have heard of leach fields freezing in very cold
weather. Unusual, but it does happen.
Peter Duke
|
193.625 | Good News | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Mon Jan 06 1992 14:44 | 9 |
| Re .0
Give thanks and be joyful. This means that your septic system
is working, as indicated in the previous reply. For technical
reference, see "The Grass Is Always Greener Over The Septic Tank,"
by Erma Bombeck.
PBM
|
193.626 | Nature at work | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Jan 07 1992 14:05 | 6 |
| I also agree with the last entries. I've always had septic systems,
and the tank does produce heat. The cover is the place where the heat
can most easily escape. Makes it easy to find the cover when you
will check it\pump it out.
Marc H.
|
193.576 | waterless closet | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Wed Jan 08 1992 17:19 | 17 |
| (RE moved discussion)
Saw a variation on this a few years ago on TV, but I have not come
across a productised version of it. Instead of open bin composting, the
thing hermetically sealed each batch of waste in a polythene ribbon
that could then be dumped as solid waste. It was designed for 0 water
wastage and it was claimed that the contents would self-compost
anaerobically to present no health risks within a few months in a
conventional landfill. No plumbing, just a single electrical
connection & optional airduct connnection. I can't see that the water
saving outweighs the additional plastic waste it would generate.
Anyone know whether it actually became a product?
C.
|
193.577 | Made in Sweden | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Thu Jan 09 1992 12:15 | 11 |
| The one I bought was a Sun Mar from a firm in Concord MA imported from
Sweden thru Canada. It is a fairly large white "throne". It is
externally vented with a fan and has a small heating element to keep
the temp above 65 degrees. One puts a starter batch of peat moss in it
along with some bacteria (supplied). Supposed to put in two cups of
peat per person per day. (Ill also use marine biodegradeable paper).
there is a drum inside with a crank = flushing. 1000s in use esp in
Europe. The only answer when the water table is higher than ground
level... yes ooozing and running off.
Bob
|
193.578 | | 11SRUS::MARK | Waltzing with Bears | Thu Jan 09 1992 13:09 | 4 |
| It was also my understanding that some company in Sweden made electric
toilets that incinerated the waste.
Mark
|
193.579 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Jan 09 1992 14:21 | 3 |
| re .14:
I hope they have a very good failsafe mechanism.
|
193.580 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Thu Jan 09 1992 15:15 | 3 |
| re: .14
mmmmm I bet that smells good...not! :-}
|
193.581 | In our parks | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Thu Jan 09 1992 16:11 | 8 |
| They use composting toilets in the El Paso County parks here in Colorado.
There's no electricity in the building, so no power venting. The sign
claims (as I recall) that the only maintenance is to empty it every three
years. There's no drum to turn or other moving parts. There appears to be
no freeze protection.
I recall a slight odor, certainly far better than an outhouse, but it's
probably not acceptable in a home.
|
193.627 | Risen Soil?!? | RANGER::DAVE | | Mon Jan 27 1992 11:44 | 6 |
| Another related question...I have noticed that the soil directly above
the septic tank has "risen" - it's level is noticeably higher than the
ground around it and it seems to be dotted with "holes" (loosened
soil). Is this normal for a new (4 mo. old) tank? Thanks!
-Sujal-
|
193.628 | heat from the septic tank for heat pump? | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Jan 27 1992 12:51 | 16 |
| I don't want to start a rat hole hese so I am hoping that the replies
to my question will be on whether or not I might cause a problem with
my septic.
I was reading an interesting article on heat pumps in Popular
Science. It seems that they are becomming more effective in higher
latitudes due to new techniques of burying the input (heat) loops in
the ground rather than having and air/air heat pump. I was wondering if
it would be a good or bad idea to run these ground loops around the
septic tank. There is all kinds of wonderful heat to be gathered there
even in winter. Could this cause serious problems by drawing too much
heat from the tank? Is there a minimum temperature at which a septic
tank might fail? Could I reach that temperature by using a heat pump to
draw heat from the tank?
Mark
|
193.629 | Go for it | DDIF::FRIDAY | CDA: The Holodeck of the future | Tue Jan 28 1992 16:06 | 12 |
| I recall a TV program that described such heat pumps, but it
was aired many years ago.
As far as I know, the input loops are fairly long, to distribute
the heat extraction over a wide range. If they're too short you'd
freeze the ground.
In terms of looping around your septic tank, what seems to make
sense is just make a couple of loops around it, and otherwise
run the loops the way they'd normally run. That is, you'd not
envelop the tank, but you'd pick up some of the heat and not
freeze the tank.
|
193.630 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Wed Jan 29 1992 13:07 | 21 |
| re: .6
Good suggestions. Actually there is a new technique for laying out the
input loops that costs far less that the older way.
The old way was to lay out straight legnths of pipe. This requires
considerable digging and expense. The new way is to lay out *coils* of
piping. This requires a slot to be dug about 6 inches wide and 6 feet
deep (depending on location and soil type). The newer method is far
cheaper to install because of this. I think that they use the same
equipment that they use for laying underground cables to dig the
trenches.
I got a line on a Civil Engineering professor at UMass in Lowell.
I'll put the question to him about this idea.
I did think of one disadvantage: With the coils ofthe input loop around
the septic tank, the heat pump would not work well for cooling during
the summer months.
Mark
|
193.631 | for those with a lot of leaves? | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Wed Jan 29 1992 13:45 | 4 |
| Somewhere here is a note describing a large compost heat in a pit as a source
of heat for a heat pump. Needs to be refueled every 6 months or something...
-Mike
|
193.715 | Chambered Leachfield | DATABS::ROYAL | | Wed Jan 29 1992 16:33 | 9 |
|
I'm interested in purchasing a home that has a "Chambered" leachfield.
This is supposed to be good, but I know next to nothing about what one
is (and neither did the realtor, he only new it was good). Is this
any better than having a leachfield/dry well combination (where only
the grey water goes to the dry well)?
-- Novice on septic systems
|
193.716 | | STRATA::JOERILEY | Everyone Can Dream... | Thu Jan 30 1992 05:54 | 27 |
| RE:.0
I've got a chambered leachfield. I had to replace my original
septic system 2 years ago (from the septic tank out, yard included).
my first system was also chambered in fact the 1st one had 4 chambers
and went bad in 6� - 7 years. The 2nd system has 3 chambers and works
much better. I believe that the theory is they provide a place to hold
the water until it leaches into the ground. After watching both systems
being put in it's quite obvious to me that the 1st system was put in
wrong also wrong kind of soil. Each chamber is approx. 4'x8'x 18" and
has a solid top, no bottom and holes all over the side. They interlock
together so with 3 chambers I have an area 4'x24'x18" to hold the water
until it leaches into the ground. I don't know how many gallons that is
but it's gotta be a bunch. As with a regular leach field only liquids
go into the chambers, solids stay in the septic tank. With the high
water table I've got (4 feet down) and the real wet spring seasons we've
had I've never had a problem with the new one. Even with the old one I
didn't have problems until the last year an half.
Joe
P.S. Oh ya with the cost of the engineer
and the contractor and all that fill they
had to bring in (over 1100 yards) the bill
came to just over $15,000.
|
193.717 | Different Application, for most part | CONFG5::SILVA | | Wed Feb 05 1992 00:19 | 18 |
| .1 seems to have the basic facts on the beast.
We just had one installed (new home) and as I understand it, it's
not as much a question of superiority, as of necessity.
In other words, where the soil and grade are "average" (however that's
defined :-), the standard leachfield will suffice. The chambered
leachfield compensates for such shortfalls as poor soil, or (in our
case) proximity to a radical grade, particularly when near wetland or
runoff areas.
I guess if someone just "gotta have the best of everything," they
could opt for one and brag about it, but its principal purpose seems
to be to allow a septic system where one wouldn't otherwise be
practical (or permissible). It sort of just "levels the playing
field" - so to speak.
tony
|
193.319 | for discussion: SEPTIC-HELPER | WMOIS::CHOW | | Fri Feb 07 1992 08:12 | 195 |
| Disclaimer- I am not a SEPTIC-HELPER salesman (or own stock in
the company which makes it) not do I play one on TV. I'm just
a typical homeowner of a 20 year old house who's trying to keep
my septic-related expenses down.
That said, I recently received a product for which I have 30 days to
decide whether to use it (any pay for it) or return it to the man-
ufacturer. The product is named SEPTIC-HELPER and made by Krane
Products, INC. P.O. Box 521, Larchmont, NY 10538 1-800-544-4074.
What the salesman claims is that if you have a normal septic system
(ie; tank w/ leech field) using SEPTIC-HELPER will keep your system
running efficiently to the point where you *NEVER* need to have it
pumped and you shouldn't ever have system-related problems. When I
heard this I thought "Yeah, sure," and figured I'd at least get more
information on it (hence receiving the product and the associated
literature). I would normally perceive products like this as snake
oil but I do have one friend whose opinion I respect a great deal
who's been using a similar product for years and swears by it. Also,
the salesman said this product would accelerate the breakdown of
grease in the septic system which is a major concern of mine.
A problem I have with a product like this is that there's are few
real means of measuring the effectiveness of it. What I've been
told is that the rate of the toilet flush should be quicker because
"every 5 years the circumference of your sewage pipes decrease by
1/2" and this stuff will eliminate that buildup. Another test I
could perform is to examine the contents of the tank before and
during use of SEPTIC-HELPER and note any changes.
What I'd like to do is post the product information here and try
to get some reasonably educated & *intelligent* feedback from some
of the more knowledgeable folks out there. I will kindly request
that people refrain from replies like "hogwash" without including
their rational for such statements and would prefer reference based
either from your personal experiences with or without similar/identical
products or cite sources for your comments. Also, the company's
been in business for over 16 years now so I assume that either the
product works somewhat or there's enough consumers like me who'll buy
their product at least once.
thanks,
MLC
Oh yeah, the cost is $100/3-year supply or $140/6-year supply and
they claim to have a 100% full money back guarantee at any time
you're using the product. The 800 number above is staffed by
"technical" people who may be able to answer questions you may have.
warning 145 lines follows the ff
Here's what the manufacturer says.....
SEPTIC-HELPER is a blend of 8 scientifically enhanced enzyme producing
bacteria that act as a catalytic agent and speeds up the degradation
rate of organic waste.
The method is natural digestion of their natural food, by living
Friendly Bacteria. Their food is organic waste matter. They recycle
waste back to the simple basic parts of soil, air, and water they were
formed from. Used by the natural laws that govern them, they feed on
wastes by digesting, liquefying and recycling them back to actually
enrich our environment. They produce NO POISONS or damaging side
effects in the process. Their action is complete. It is truly a
Natural Solution.
----------------
Today our systems don't receive an adequate bacteria supply from
natural sources. Use of acids, caustics, detergents (and modern
bacteriostats and disinfectants to kill germs), also kill the Friendly
Bacteria our systems must have to operate trouble-free, healthfully,
and without great maintenance costs.
Specifically SEPTIC-HELPER is composed of: 8 scientifically enhanced
biostrains 3 strains of Bacillus subtilis, 1 strain of Bacillus
licheniformis, 1 strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 1 strain of
Pseudomonas stutzeri, 1 strain of Escherichia hermanii, 1 strain of
Pseudomonas flourescens
These bacteria strains work together with your septic systems naturally
occurring bacteria to aid in quicker breakdown of difficult compounds
and improve the overall performance of any septic system. These
bacteria produce enzymes to liquefy and digest the solid wastes. Some
of these enzymes are:
Lipase enzymes - These enzymes attack all fats and greases, break down
their molecular structure and dissolves them.
Amylase enzymes - These enzymes break down all starches they come in
contact with, as with Lipase Enzymes the molecular structure is broken
down and the starches are dissolved.
Protease - The most common of wastes found in Septic systems, these
particular type of enzymes literally feed on, break down and dissolve
all organic wastes of the protein family.
All the mentioned bacteria are Salmonella negative, non-pathogenic,
non-toxic and harmless to animals or man.
SEPTIC-HELPER has a bacteria count of at least 1 billion organisms/OZ.
SEPTIC SYSTEMS AND WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW
The design of a septic system requires careful and intelligent planning.
The character of the soil is the first important factor that must be
considered. The soil that is most favorable for the disposal of the
purified liquid waste of the septic system, is of a sandy nature.
Sand or gravel absorbs moisture and permits rapid leaching of the liquid
waste into the subsoil. Another favorable condition is where the
contour or slope of the soil is at such distance from the purification
unit of the septic tank that a gravity flow in the discharge line is
possible.
The soil must have an accepted percolation or absorption rate, without
interference from ground water or impervious layers below the level of
the absorption system. In general, two conditions must be met:
1) The percolation or absorption time.
2) The maximum elevation of the ground-water table should be at least
four feet below the surface. Rock formations or other impervious layers
should be deeper than four feet below the bottom of the trench. Unless
these two conditions are satisfied, the site is unsuitable for a sub
surface sewage disposal system.
The septic tank is a device used to expedite the decomposition of the
elements contained in raw sewage waste. Raw sewage consists of water
and settleable solid materials, such as grit, grease, fats, vegetable
and animal materials in a suspended state and non-settable materials
of a vegetable and mineral nature in solution. It has a milky color
and may have an extremely offensive odor. The settleable solids,
usually referred to as organic materials, can be liquefied in a septic
tank in a very short time. Approximately a 24-hour period of retention
offers satisfactory results. The solid organic materials, being more
dense than water, tend to settle to the bottom of the tank and are
technically referred to as sludge. The lighter organic materials,
being less dense than water, rise to the surface of the water and
usually are referred to as scum. The suspended materials constitute
only a small part of the raw sewage by actual weight. The organic
materials in solution in the raw sewage offer a more difficult problem.
They cannot be liquefied in the septic tank and must undergo further
treatment by processes other than liquefaction. The liquid content
of raw sewage does not present a problem other than that of its
discharge into the subsoil or natural drainage terminal.
HOW SEPTIC-HELPER WORKS
SEPTIC-HELPER is designed to prevent the main causes of trouble in
the efficient operation of your septic system or cesspool.
Today modern detergents and bleaches can decrease the number of bacteria
which are necessary to the liquefaction and digestion process needed
to break down organic matter in your system. With limited amounts of
bacteria in your system, the solid matter builds up and blocks your
lines and pipes which causes backup and foul odors.
SEPTIC-HELPER with its scientifically enhanced bacteria and enzymes
goes to work liquefying and digesting greases, fats, oils, detergents
and cellulose. It liquefies and digests some organic wastes to help
eliminate build up in your system and drain field. It is truly a
NATURAL SOLUTION to help prevent organic build up.
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
Order SEPTIC-HELPER - try it. If you're not entirely satisfied with
SEPTIC-HELPER just send back the unused portion and you'll be sent
a refund immediately. This is how confident we are that SEPTIC-HELPER
will maintain your system for its entire life as long as you follow
the single instructions.
SAFE TO USE
SEPTIC-HELPER is 100% safe to use. It is guaranteed to be harmless
to humans, animals, all plant matters and pipes including plastics.
REDUCE PUMP OUTS
SEPTIC-HELPER saves money and inconvenience by possibly reducing the
frequency of septic tank pumpouts. A small amount of SEPTIC-HELPER
can help liquefy and digest some organic solids. It will also help
clean the lines leading to the septic tank. SEPTIC-HELPER goes to
work immediately in your septic system to help digest the organic
solids and clean the walls. It is carried out to the drain field
to help reduce organic build up. It is a treatment program for the
entire system. SEPTIC-HELPER is harmless to humans and animals and
will not harm plants, trees or pipes. Simply pour some down your
commode and flush.
Nothing is more embarrassing than a foul odor - especially when
company visits - not to mention the daily discomfort your family will
experience. There simply is no reason you have to worry about this
problem ever again. With SEPTIC-HELPER so readily available - and so
easy to use, stop worrying. Put SEPTIC-HELPER to work for you and
relax..................
|
193.320 | I'd vote against it | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Fri Feb 07 1992 16:23 | 24 |
| I bought a similar product about 5 years ago. It was called
Septic-Cleanz (or something like that). The claims were all the same.
However, this was something like $75 for a 5-6 year supply. So it was a
little more affordable.
I had many, many septic system problems in my previous house. I
thought this stuff would at least help. By cleaning the pipe from my
house to the septic tank, what this stuff showed me was that I had
holes in my pipe that had been clogged up with gunk for years. So
although it appeared to clean my pipe, I ended up with more septic
problems than before. I also so no difference in how often the tank
needed to be pumped.
Well, I brought the stuff with me to my current house...which has a
better septic system. I've lived here for 2.5 years and use this stuff
once a month. I've had the tank pumped out once, and it desperately
needed it. It was rock solid all the way to the top, and it had
supposedly been pumped 3 years earlier (before I moved in). Well, after
pumping out the tank, I've still be using the stuff religiously, but I
really don't think it's having much effect. It could be that I put
stuff in the tank which renders it ineffective. I don't know. I'm going
to have the tank pumped again this fall (which will be 2 years since
the last pumping) and see how everything looks.
There are products available in hardware stores for a LOT cheaper
and in smaller amounts that appear to do the same things. It might be a
lot smarter to go this route for a while and see what you think.
|
193.321 | I think it works | SALEM::TOWLE_C | Corky | Sat Feb 08 1992 09:03 | 9 |
| RE: .177
I've been using a similar product called Septi-Zone marketed by Amacanada
Corp for over 12 years. A 16 oz. bag once a month flushed down the toilet
seems to do the trick. A 3 year supply goes $69.00.
I haven't had to have the tank pumped since I started using it.
Strictly from a user standpoint, I'd say it lives up to its claims.
|
193.322 | | STRATA::JOERILEY | Everyone Can Dream... | Mon Feb 10 1992 04:14 | 14 |
| RE:.177
> the salesman said this product would accelerate the breakdown of
> grease in the septic system which is a major concern of mine.
If you plan on putting grease in your septic system it won't
last long no matter what you use. I've seen what poring grease
down the drain can do to a system and I've also seen what a backhoe
did to my neighbors yards trying to find the tank lucky for him the
outlet on the tank plugged up before the grease got out into his
leachfield.
Joe
|
193.323 | | WMOIS::CHOW | | Mon Feb 10 1992 08:11 | 11 |
| re: Note 832.180 Septic questions 180 of 180
> If you plan on putting grease in your septic system it won't
> last long no matter what you use.
Joe...I'm not planning on *intentionally* putting grease into the system.
I was just concerned about the smaller amounts of oils & grease that covers
the pots and pans during regular cooking. Based on my limited understanding
of septic system workings I don't understand how these would normally break
down and see them as a cause of potential buildup, hence accelerating any
system breakdown.
|
193.324 | | TOKLAS::feldman | Larix decidua, var. decify | Sun Feb 16 1992 18:20 | 8 |
| Ask the sales rep if there have been any independent studies validating
the effectiveness of their product. I have yet to see any independent
source recommending any septic tank additives, other than root killer in cases
where tree roots are growing into the system.
It sounds like they're selling FUD.
Gary
|
193.325 | RID-X is cheap | STRATA::CASSIDY | Aspiring conservationist | Mon Feb 17 1992 00:47 | 6 |
|
I think the usefuleness of septic system additives (bacteria)
is directly proportional to the amount of bacteria killers you pour
down the drain. They claim to help break down grease, also. We
pour our grease in a coffee can kept under the sink.
|
193.326 | How deep? | RCFLYR::CAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh SHR1-3/R20 Dtn:237-2252 | Wed Mar 04 1992 09:59 | 9 |
|
How far underground is the pipe exiting the house suppose to be? The reason
I ask is that I'm having a house built and they put the hole in the foundation
for the pipe about 3 feet from the door of my walkout. How much are they going
to have to build up the ground next to my door?
Jim
|
193.327 | Don't let it freeze | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Wed Mar 04 1992 11:10 | 7 |
| Below the frost line. It depends upon where you live. From my experience:
Worcester, MA: 4 feet
Tucson, AZ: 6 inches (although the pipes did freeze once in 18 years at
this depth)
Colorado Springs, CO: 3 feet (at 6400' - drive 20 miles and you're at 9000',
and need to bury deeper)
|
193.328 | | UPSAR::WALLACE | Vince Wallace | Wed Mar 04 1992 11:59 | 7 |
| Going below the frost line is probably overkill. I asked the health
inspector about this when I had my system replaced a few years ago.
I was concerned because the pipe exited near the surface. He said
not to worry, "s**t never freezes!". He added that he even knew of
places where the waste pipe was run above ground without any problems.
This was in Massachusetts. If you live in northern Siberia, maybe
other rules apply.
|
193.329 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | DCU -- Vote for "REAL CHOICES" | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:24 | 6 |
|
Mine is about 2' below ground, never had a problem. Remember --
you'll have to dig down to the tank once in a while.
(Townsend Harbor -- the official coldest spot in Massachusetts)
|
193.330 | the code is what counts here | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Mar 04 1992 12:39 | 22 |
| My septic pipe is less than 1' down. The tank itself is 0' down. And my
rabbit has excavated a number of feet of the pipe where it leaves the
house. But even so, the only sewage backups I've ever had were due to
junk in the pipe *inside* my basement. And that includes two weeks
where it never got above 10 degrees (in central Massachusetts).
After all, water doesn't sit in a septic pipe, it flows through. And even
cold water probably leaves the house at about 55 degrees. It just isn't
likely to freeze during the time it takes to flow 20 feet (or however far
your tank is from your house). Even if the water were 33 degrees, it
would still take a lot of cooling to move it across the phase transition
to its solid form.
HOWEVER, I think the real question here is: "How deep will the building
inspector insist that it be?" I suggest asking the building inspector.
You'll have lots of problems if the pipe exits the house higher up than
the building inspector wants it. After all, the code may require
burying the pipe deep enough to avoid accidental breakage from digging --
electrical conduit has to be 2' down for that reason.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
193.331 | I was ready to kill the builder.... | TLE::MCCARTHY | DECTPU | Thu Mar 05 1992 07:23 | 8 |
| My pipe was exposed at the drip edge line of the hose. It is less than one
inch below the soil at that point and slopes out. The important part is the
slope (according to the town).
This is Merrimack NH.
Brian.
|
193.332 | | 28245::CAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh SHR1-3/R20 Dtn:237-2252 | Thu Mar 05 1992 09:06 | 13 |
|
Wow! Thanks for all the quick responses!
The house is being built on Rt 20 in Northboro Mass. It sounds like I
shouldn't have a problem with the pipe.
Thanks again for the info.
Jim
|
193.333 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Mar 05 1992 11:13 | 1 |
| Shouldn't be a problem. Mine is about 6" down, I think.
|
193.334 | so confuzing... | PINCK::GREEN | Long Live the Duck!!! | Thu Mar 12 1992 15:46 | 16 |
|
We are looking into buying a house with a septic system. We checked
out the house at the Town Hall and found a letter from a septic company.
It basically says that company A came and failed the septic system.
Then company B (this company) came and said that the system is not
failed, that it has a biological block ????? They treated the system
with hydrogen peroxide. The company that treated the system gives a
three year guarentee on the system (for the price of the treatment) and
says that the system is as good as new??? That it should last another
20-30 years with periodical drainings.
Has anyone ever heard of this hydrogen peroxide treatment, or
biological blocks?
Thanks for any info,
Amy
|
193.335 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Mar 13 1992 08:59 | 2 |
| I think I'd go and talk to Company A, tell them what Company B
did, ask if they think it will work, and if not, why not.
|
193.336 | | GIAMEM::TRAINOR | Anchored in my driveway... | Fri Mar 13 1992 09:49 | 3 |
| What department in the typical town hall maintains such records? Would
it be the health inspector, or the building inspector, or some other
department?
|
193.337 | | OLIVIA::DEHAHN | ninety eight don't be late | Fri Mar 13 1992 10:17 | 4 |
|
Board of Health
CdH
|
193.338 | | PINCK::GREEN | Long Live the Duck!!! | Fri Mar 13 1992 11:07 | 6 |
|
Yes, it was at the Board of Health that I received the information.
So, nobody has heard of hydrogen peroxide treatments?
Amy
|
193.339 | Maybe not a long term solution | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Mar 13 1992 14:42 | 16 |
| I have heard of hydrogen peroxide treatment for septic systems. My
understanding is that they can open up a leach field that is no
longer working. My understanding is also that this is a temporary
process that can be used to delay replacing the system, but that
it in no way returns the system to anything like "new".
If a septic system had failed and then been "restored" by this
treatment, I would expect that it should be replaced within 2-3
years. If there is room on the property for a second, new leach
field that would probably be the way to go. Otherwise you would
have to dig out and replace all the soil from the failed field. I
believe that the removed soil is considered "hazardous waste", so
this option becomes considerably more expensive.
Please note that my information is HEARSAY and ANECDOTAL. i.e.
I've never discussed this with a knowledgeable civil engineer.
|
193.340 | re: .177 (Septic-Helper) | DINK::BRODERICK | I hate it when this name gets truncated | Mon Mar 23 1992 13:22 | 30 |
| This is a reply from a few discussions back regarding SEPTIC-HELPER. (I just
got caught up with HOME_WORK last night.)
I just got a similar phone call yesterday from them. Usually I end such phone
solicitations quite abruptly. But for some reason I decided to listen to the
guy. After listening to his speil, I asked im to send me the literature in the
mail, and I'd look at it, and get back to him. He told me that he *couldn't*
do that. You had to receive free shipment of the product and then return it
within 30-days, if not satisfied. (I'm not sure if it was COD, or billed
later) Well, that set off the scam alarms in my head (trying to figure out
"what's the catch?")
I told him I use RID-X and was content with it. He went on to tell me that
SPETIC-HELPER costs about � what RID-X does. And then he tried to show me all
the fillers RID-X has in it that ar ebad for septic systems, like salt and
iron. I have no idea whether these items are bad for septic systems or not.
Without examining their ingredients or verifying the costs, I imagine
SEPTIC-HELPER does a reasonable job as a septic system bacteria additive. It
seems to me that "the catch" is that they are selling you a 6-year supply. In
most cases, they'll get their money, with minimal sales/marketing overhead (1
phone call) and that'll be the last you ever hear from them. If the product
doesn't work, (and you go for the money back guarantee) the company may be no
where to be found! And besides, if your system fails, getting the $140 back,
will be the least of your financial worries.
I'll stick with RID-X for now. It's not too expensive, and has decent report.
_Mike
|
193.341 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Mar 24 1992 07:56 | 13 |
| Re: .198
Well, my water is loaded with iron, or was until I put in a water
softener, and the iron never seemed to hurt the septic system.
Now the septic system gets about 3-5 lb. of salt every 6 days from
the water softener, and that doesn't seem to bother it either.
So much for all the awful things in RID-X.
Besides, IMO there is absolutely no need to add *anything* to a
septic system to make it work; it will get along very nicely with
no additives whatsoever. The best thing you can do for it is treat
it with respect and avoid putting chemicals, grease, etc. into it.
That will do more to help your septic system than anything you could
possibly add to "help" it.
|
193.342 | Unbelievable | CADSYS::SIMSNS::FENNELL | Swervin' Irvan" | Wed Mar 25 1992 10:19 | 13 |
| I got a call from this company. I listened quietly to the pitch, then said I
wasn't interested. The guy starts going why not? Why wouldn't I want to use it?
At this point I'm no longer interested in listening to him. So I state
I don't want to discuss the product and I'm not interested. I hang up.
The phone rings. My wife answers it.
The guy goes. Tell your daddy he's a son of a b!x@h
Sounds like a great company...
Tim
|
193.343 | DIY Septic Inspection | TOKLAS::feldman | Larix decidua, var. decify | Mon Apr 06 1992 14:11 | 29 |
| Here's a DIY Success Story. Hit Next Unseen if you can't take the smell.
I've been planning on turning the ad hoc flower patch above our septic tank
into a more permanent arrangement, with a pseudo-brick concrete border. But
I wanted to make sure that the concrete border doesn't interfere with digging
up the tank, so I needed the exact location of the cover (I knew the
location of the tank, but not where the cover was on the tank). Also,
since we've been in the house for 4.5 years without having the tank inspected
or pumped, we felt it was time to make sure it was working well.
I found the tank about 18 inches under my starting point, and with a little
bit of hunting, and relying on past memory and snow melting pattersn, found the
cover. We used an old curtain rod to inspect it, crimping the rod where the
two halves joined so that the lower half wouldn't fall out. The
curtain rod seemed like a good choice, since the bent portion on the
bottom could detect the beginnings of the sludge (heavier than water solids).
The guidelines I had said that if the scum (solids on top) or sludge were more
than a quarter the depth of the tank (i. e., the tank contains more solid than
liquid), then it's time to pump. We had hardly any scum, and less than
4 inches
of sludge, so we figure we're good for another 6 to 10 years at least,
and could probably go indefinitely. That's with absolutely no RID-X or
other such treatments. It was certainly worth the labor for some good
peace of mind.
Gary
PS and with a brisk wind, the smell was quite tolerable.
|
193.344 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Apr 06 1992 16:48 | 11 |
| Re: .201
I also inspect my septic tank around once a year. I use a long wooden
stick, and have yet to find any significant amount of sludge.
I can find the scum though. Its a rough job, and once the scum is
disturbed, the smell...well............
Still, its nice to know whats going on.
Marc H.
|
193.345 | Bearable... | MANTHN::EDD | Real programs in DCL? .NOT.! | Mon Apr 06 1992 17:24 | 12 |
| re: septic smell
I was actually surpried the first time I opened my tank. I expected
a slightly more (how to put this politely?) "recently used bathroom"
odor, but found it to be much more similar to the smell of the muck
at the edge of a swamp. My dog used to smell like that after he came
home from fishing. Decaying organic matter...
All things considered, I wouldn't buy a bottle of similarly scented
"toilet water" (pun intended) but it wasn't at all what I expected...
Edd
|
193.346 | It's not just bearable! | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Tue Apr 07 1992 10:33 | 10 |
| Oh yes, I actually love the smell! We make it a family event at my
house every year. My kids can hardly wait for the annual septic tank
inspection! I've been thinking about just leaving the cover off to let
the odor permeate the entire house and neighborhood and marketing a new
cologne with that special scent. I've often wondered why those guys who
pump septic tanks for a living are so successful with women. Now their
secret's out!
I get a stomach ache just thinking about lifting the cover
off...but then again, I have some rather unpleasant memories on this
subject...and odor is well known to stimulate memory.
|
193.347 | How do you adjust pump floats? | ANOVAX::JWICKERT | b a ba, b e be, b i bickey by | Wed Apr 15 1992 15:29 | 11 |
| Re. .122
How do you adjust the floats? I have a similar symptom of the pump
cycling on and off to much. I've been told that it is normal for a
small amount of liquid to come back to the pump tank, that way any
solid particles come back to the tank and don't go into the leach
field. When I move the float up and down it turns the pump on and off
with a minimal amount of movement. I did not think this was correct but
I did not see an adjustment.
JRW
|
193.18 | Septic estimate, real? | CASEE::EISENBERG | VTX Engineering, C�te d'Azur | Fri Apr 24 1992 16:29 | 25 |
| I'm in the process of replacing my septic system in Francestown, N.H.
The ground perked well (not sure of the rate) but there was no water
down to 10 ft when they dug the hole. It was a bit rocky at the bottom
so there may be a need for 20-30 yards of sand at the bottom of the
leach field. The esimate I got was:
Designer $ 450
State Inspection 90
1500 gal. tank,
900 ft� field 4800
If sand needed 300
-------------------------
Total possible cost $5640
This includes changing the hookup to the house, and will be designed
for a 4 bedroom house. The tank is about 25 ft from the house, and the
field is about 50-60 ft from the tank. The pipe from the tank to the
field passes under the driveway, and needs some kind of sleeve
(included).
I'm wondering if this is a reasonable estimate (I'm going to try to get
some others). Does this seem like a reasonable estimate? The guy
said 20 hours of backhoe work would be required. Anyone know what the
rates are for backhoe these days?
|
193.19 | more estimates | CASEE::EISENBERG | VTX Engineering, C�te d'Azur | Mon Apr 27 1992 10:35 | 11 |
| Just for the record, I called a couple of other places, and with the
specs in .-1 they gave me rough estimates of $6-8K, and $5-10K. They
said they needed to see the design for a real estimate, but since I'm
setting this up remotely with only a short stay in the U.S. I didn't
have the time for that.
So, I'm going with the first guy who did the perk test.
I'll post the results when it's done.
alf
|
193.469 | Try this on a sluggish drain | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Jun 17 1992 12:55 | 30 |
| I wasn't sure whether to put this in here or in 353, but figured this might
be more appropriate and most folks would find it if they looked in 1111.78
anyway.
I just learned of a totally septic system safe means of unclogging sluggish
drains that I never might have believed would have worked if I hadn't seen
it with my own eyes.
I have a second floor bathroom sink whose drain had been super sluggish
for quite some time. It had gotten to the point that you could sometimes
leave water in the sink for an entire day without it draining. Plunging
was of some help but never really "fixed" the problem. A bottle of
septic-safe Liquid Plumber hadn't touched the problem. I intended to snake
the drain to remove the offending clog, but hadn't gotten around to it
yet since I needed to remove the stopper from underneath the sink first.
My mother was visiting and said she'd learned of a foolproof method for
clearing drains safely. She poured a cup of sodium bicarbonate into
the dry sink and pushed the dry powder into the open drain as much as
possible. Following this, in went a cup of cider vinegar. Then we left
it alone for about half an hour and returned with two quarts of boiling
water which we poured in, followed by another two quarts another half hour
later.
Immediately after the last half gallon of hot water went in the drain
worked as slick as a whistle.
Don't ask me how or why, but it worked.
-Jack
|
193.470 | | MANTHN::EDD | Turn 4 (Bang) Turn 4 (Bang) | Wed Jun 17 1992 13:10 | 7 |
| I'll bet if you could seal the drain airtight, you could have literally
blasted the clog out...
I used to build rockets that ran on baking soda and vinegar. The two
substance make LOTS of (carbon dioxide?) when mixed...
Edd
|
193.471 | | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Jun 17 1992 14:45 | 8 |
| Hey, Trooper Edd!
I would have thought the same type of thing in a closed system. But this
was just an open drain and I suspect most of the CO2 presssure was just venting
back up through the sink. But it still worked . . .
-Jack
|
193.472 | | MICRON::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jun 17 1992 14:57 | 3 |
| Is the hot water dissolving the grease in the pipes?
Marc H.
|
193.473 | | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Jun 17 1992 17:15 | 6 |
| re: .6, Marc
Don't know. As it's a 2nd floor bathroom, the only "grease" should be from
soapscum, etc. - no kitchen waste.
-Jack
|
193.474 | Thar she blows... | KITES::BOWEN | Arrow | Thu Jun 18 1992 09:30 | 5 |
|
I can see it now, the first septic tank in space...thats quite a
payload...
-Ian
|
193.688 | Perc test results??? | WAGON::POMEROY | | Wed Jul 15 1992 13:59 | 19 |
| I have a question about perc tests.
We are looking into buying a piece of land that has already been
perced.
How/where do we get the results from the perc test? Will they
be something that we can understand? If not, who can help us?
I spoke to a neighbor of this property and he claims to have
seen the results and says they will need to bring in 9 feet of fill
to accomodate the septic system, which will put the house up on
a hill. We like this piece of property because it is flat.
Help! We already made an offer, "subject to agreeing on floor plan".
Can we just change our mind and tell them we want our deposit back?
We're meeting with the builder again tonight.
Thanks
|
193.689 | Town Engineer | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jul 15 1992 16:05 | 4 |
| Check with the towns engineer or building inspector. The town
engineer where I live (grafton) has the perc info for my home.
Marc H.
|
193.690 | They didn't tell you about 9' of fill??? | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Jul 15 1992 16:49 | 16 |
| If it were me and I had talked to them about how I liked the fact that it
was flat, and they didn't tell me that it requires a 9' hill, then I'd
probably decide to walk away. Assuming that it really does require 9'
of fill -- get the perc test and all the data first. They should be
willing to give you a copy of the test, but go to the town engineer
anyway -- that person will probably be willing to give you a lot of
straight info about what is required, how soon it is likely to fail, etc.
Actually, though, I like living on a hill -- less street noise, more
privacy, better view, and no matter how much it snows, I can always get
out my driveway (although I may not be able to get back in). But it
takes all kinds. And I wouldn't want to live on fill, not to mention
that adding fill around trees kills them (builders do it anyway).
Luck,
Larry
|
193.691 | more info | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Thu Jul 16 1992 10:24 | 32 |
| In designing septic systems you need to know two important pieces of
information: How large an area in square feet is required for drainage,
and how deep will it need to be. It is the results of the Perc test and
deep hole that largely determine these numbers.
The perc test only determines how much area your leaching field
must cover to handle the water output from your home. The slower the
perc rate the larger the area needed. (Also the more bedroom you want
the larger the area needed.)
The deep hole test is one of the ways that the depth of the system
is determined. In Mass you need something like 5 feet above "refusal".
This means that the *bottom* of the leaching pipes must be located *at
least* five feet above anything that would not absorb the water that
the leaching pipes will output. "Refusal" can be rock, ledge, or ground
water.
Since ground water can vary at different times of the year a ground
water test is usually done in the spring. My system had a deep hole
test of over 9 feet, which is excellent. Unfortunately in the spring
the ground water is at two feet. This means that I will need to add
three feet of fill just to get to the bottom os my leaching field.
There will be an additional two(?) feet of fill needed to cover the
pipes after that.
If I am remembering my numbers correctly, and you are in Mass, the
most that you should need is 7 feet of fill, and only then if there is
standing water or solid rock where you would want the septic system.
Try to find out which Civil Engineering firm did the tests and then
talk to them. Your realtor should be able to provide their name. If I
were in *your* shoes and could not get satisfactory information, I
would have a very difficult time "agreeing on (a) floor plan" ;-)
|
193.692 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Thu Jul 16 1992 10:26 | 3 |
| I forgot to mention - Perc tests are measured in Minutes/Inch. That is
how many minutes does it take for water in a perf pipe to go down by
one inch. In Mass anything over 30 mins/inch is no good.
|
193.693 | Fill, fill, and fill some more | GOLF::BROUILLET | | Thu Jul 16 1992 13:38 | 27 |
| > <<< Note 4680.3 by KEYBDS::HASTINGS >>>
> If I am remembering my numbers correctly, and you are in Mass, the
> most that you should need is 7 feet of fill.
Well, maybe not. If a system is built in fill, i.e., when the ground
water level is < 4 ft below existing grade, they will make you excavate
the existing ground under the bed and replace it with clean 2 minute
perc material (screened gravel or coarse sand). Also, Title V (MA
environmental code that applies to septic systems) requires excavation
and fill in a 25' radius around the leaching bed. We're talking some
serious fill here.
I'm having a system installed right now, where the highest spring
ground water reading was 2' below grade. The plan called for
excavation about a foot below that. The BOH inspector came out to look
at it, and decided that another foot or two had to be excavated. So, I
can see how it's possible to end up with as much as 9 feet of fill,
depending on the whim of the BOH.
BTW, I wouldn't let the fact that a system had to be built in fill
discourage me from selecting a piece of land. With all that gravel in
there, the system is likely to work well for a loooong time. Just bear
in mind that the lot probably has a high ground water level, and you
may run into water-in-the-basement problems unless you put in good
drainage, and have a place downgrade to run the drains.
Don
|
193.694 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Thu Jul 16 1992 18:06 | 3 |
| Oh! thanks for the correction. I have just received my OKs from the
state and town for my septic system. I am in the same boat as .5 in
that my ground water is at 2 feet. Yes, we are talking serious fill!
|
193.695 | | WAGON::POMEROY | | Fri Jul 17 1992 13:16 | 37 |
| Hi. Well we decided to back out of the deal.
We FINALLY saw the plot plan. The perc tests were done in July 1988!!!
I do remember seeing 19 minutes/inch on it. But we asked the builder
what kind of soil it is and he said "gravel", he hesitated and then
said "on top of clay". My father asked him how far down the water
table is and he said 4 feet.
So they would have to bring in fill. It would cost us ALOT of money
in the future if we decide to put in an inground pool. The whole
think seemed to shaky.
The builder was supposed to bring his references with him and when
we asked for them, he said he forgot. Then later on, my husband
heard him say that he won't supply references unless we give him
a committment. I'm sorry, but I don't deal that way. How can we
commit to something without researching first?
When we left, the realtor asked us to call as soon as possible "to
be fair to the builder". I told her to call us as soon as possible
with his references "to be fair to us".
Maybe it wasn't the right thing to do, but we put a stop payment
on our check.
We are now dealing with another builder on another lot. He is much
more reputable. We've heard nothing but good about him. He's
local, he used a local plumber and electrician and he uses top
quality items.
Another thing, the original builder was going to give us EVERYTHING
we wanted, cathedral ceiling, paladian window, covered porch, two-car
garage, etc. The second builder said he can't do it within our price
range. What does that tell ya? We feel the first builder would have
given us "junk" construction.
Thanks for all the replies... we're learning.
|
193.696 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Jul 17 1992 13:56 | 8 |
| > My father asked him how far down the water
> table is and he said 4 feet.
>
> So they would have to bring in fill. It would cost us ALOT of money
> in the future if we decide to put in an inground pool.
Ah, but if you didn't bring in fill, you'd have a pre-made inground pool
in the basement.
|
193.697 | | WAGON::POMEROY | | Fri Jul 17 1992 14:19 | 4 |
| We would also have a "floating" house.
No thanks
|
193.653 | ACID TREATMENT ON LEACH FIELD | TOLKIN::GUERRA | Victory never comes without a struggle | Wed Jul 29 1992 11:42 | 16 |
| This looks like a good place to ask this questions since it is related to acid
treatments. We are in the process of buying a four-year-old house. The owners
(husband and wife with two small kids) had never pumped the septic. As a result,
when the lid was opened, we found that the solids were already shaped like the
bottom of the lid (ie. heaping full). The tank was pumped and the inspector
noticed a trickle of water coming back from the leach field suggesting that it
was starting to clog up. He stated that the system neither passes nor fails
inspection (how's that for being wishy-washy). Someone else suggested doing an
acid treatment just in case. The sellers are proceeding with this measure.
My question is, given the fact that the soil had an excellent perk rate and that
the problem seems to be marginal, what are the chances of this procedure being
successful and us not having a problem with the leach field a year down the
road? Also, what are the chances of this not being needed at all?
Thanks for any help.
|
193.654 | Something is Very Wrong | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jul 29 1992 11:53 | 9 |
| Something is wrong here.....after four years of "normal" operation,
a septic system should be no where close to "full". If the tank was
full of solids, then it must have been no organic stuff.
By the way....the top layer looks solid, but it is only ..usually...
one foot thick. Underneath it, is liquid until you get to the tank
bottom, when you hit the solid, non organic stuff.
Marc H.
|
193.655 | Don't sound good | RESYNC::D_SMITH | | Wed Jul 29 1992 12:25 | 10 |
| re:- I agree. The system has either never been pumped for maybe eight
years or the system is small (under 1000 gallons) for the number of
beds.
As fas as the acid treatment, I witnessed the inlaws salvage a
previously neglected system this way with good results.
Watch it though...Dave'
|
193.656 | | TOLKIN::GUERRA | Victory never comes without a struggle | Wed Jul 29 1992 13:11 | 14 |
| The house is only 4 years old (and so is the sepcit system) and the tank is 1500
gals. The guy that pumped it was not surprised to see it that full, though.
The tank was not full of solids. The solids at the top were already up to the
lid leading me to believe that the water underneath was not going anywhere. The
tank at my present house has been pumped twice in 7 years and neither time it
has been anywhere close to having solids touch the lid. And this one is only a
1000 gal. tank. That's why I am concerned that an acid treatment may not do the
job. There's no water seeping out of the ground where the leach field is.
Keep them comming. We're about to write up a P&S on this house and I want to
make sure the proper contingencies are included.
Thanks.
|
193.657 | My experience | CADSYS::FLEECE::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Wed Jul 29 1992 15:17 | 23 |
| When I bought my house in 1987, I had the exact same results from my septic
inspection. Honest.
Previous owners: Two adults, two kids. I had it pumped as part of the
inspection. I lived there for 2 1/2 years by myself, caring for it (no bleach or
chemicals down the drain, white toilet paper, etc). I had it pumped again as
a precaution. The guy (same outfit as before) said he rarely sees a system in
such good shape. Since then there have been 2 to 3 adults living there, and we
have had no problems.
My conclusion is that the previous owners abused and/or overused the septic
system. With proper care, it functions properly. Even a brand new system can
be brought to its knees in a month or two of total abuse.
My advice to you: Talk to the town engineer/board of health/health inspector,
whatever the title in your town. Find a septic plan, and if possible, locate
the system designer and installer. Decide from your conversations with all
these folks if things will be okay as soon as you start taking care of the system
properly, or if you should write something into the P&S.
Good luck.
Elaine
|
193.658 | Just use caution. | AIMHI::RENDA | | Fri Jul 31 1992 14:09 | 8 |
|
We just went through the horror and stress of having a septic/leach
installed. The system we replaced was only 7 years old. I agree with
checking the plans and making sure all is in place and writing
something into the P&S. Ours failed 2 years after buying the house.
|
193.85 | hydrogen peroxide treatment | CPDW::LALIBERTE | CIS Systems Engineering | Mon Feb 08 1993 09:38 | 8 |
| has anyone done a hydrogen peroxide treatment of their septic system?
we are on the verge of having to get a new system...it is really time
for a 40 year old house....but right now to get to the summer time
the guy is suggesting a h.p. treatment to improve it for a while...
any comments?
|
193.86 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Feb 08 1993 10:07 | 6 |
| Why use hydrogen peroxide? This chemical reacts to form a lot of
oxygen gas. I thought that the bacteria that you used in your
septic tank did not need oxygen?
Marc H.
|
193.87 | | NODEX::GREEN | Long Live the Duck!!! | Mon Feb 08 1993 13:59 | 7 |
|
note 832.197 replied to my note asking for info on
hydrogen peroxide treatment. I am still not sure what to
make of it...
Amy
|
193.698 | cost? | KEPNUT::GAGNON | | Tue Mar 09 1993 15:59 | 12 |
|
Can anyone give a ballpark figure on the cost of a perc test ?
This would be in Westminster, Ma. Most of the pieces of land I've
looked at had percs already done. I found a lot recently that
hasn't been perced yet, so I'd like to know if there should be
a price reduction.
Thanks,
Ken
|
193.699 | | ROULET::JOERILEY | Everyone can dream... | Wed Mar 10 1993 04:15 | 7 |
|
I paid $230 back in 1989. Most of that was to hire the backhoe to
do the digging. I really don't remember exactly but $75 an hour seems
to ring a bell (they had to dig a few holes to find a suitable location)
and part was for the fellow doing the test.
Joe
|
193.700 | | GANTRY::63262::CHAPMAN | Jim Chapman DTN 471-5323 | Mon Mar 22 1993 16:25 | 10 |
| I wouldn't purchase the property without an acceptable perc test or
soil evaluation (they don't do perc tests in my Michigan county
anymore). The seller should provide the test. You can be there to
indicate where you would like the septic system to go, if the lot is
such that you have a choice.
At least make the purchase contingent upon an acceptable perc test.
There is little value in a lot that you can't build on.
Jim Chapman
|
193.709 | How to locate a leach field? | AMCMKO::HAZARIKA | | Wed Mar 31 1993 22:40 | 9 |
| We are in the process of buying a house in Merrimack, New Hampshire.
The inspector couldn't find the leach field. The plans registered at
the town hall 16 years back don't seem to be accurate. Any ideas on
how to locate the leach field or how do I find out if there is a leach
field? The house is located on top of hill.
Appreciate the help.
Kem
|
193.710 | check the swamp? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Apr 01 1993 07:41 | 7 |
|
Find the tank???? and follow the pipe out. You might have to
dig a few small holes but once you get to the "D" box, you
should be golden......
JD
|
193.711 | Another Method | ISLNDS::MCWILLIAMS | | Thu Apr 01 1993 11:21 | 6 |
| Even easier than that, get a metal bar push it into the ground about a
foot or more (to get past the dirt cap), pull it out and sniff. At this
time of year with high water, you should be able to smell the septage
(unless the system is inactive).
/jim
|
193.712 | only on a friday! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Apr 02 1993 07:43 | 7 |
|
....Ah, that Idea stinks!!!.....................
Bah da boom
Bah da bing!
|
193.713 | Any more great ideas? | AMCMKO::HAZARIKA | | Tue Apr 13 1993 21:01 | 9 |
| Haven't located the leachfield as yet, however, I did find two pipes
6" (approx) in diameter with some sort of a valve on top. Any idea if
this could be a part of the septic system?
The system has been inactive for quite sometime now. This is one time
I wish it would stink....
Kem
|
193.714 | Pyde piper?? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Apr 14 1993 08:51 | 5 |
|
I'd guess to say...maybe... if their location is on the other
side of the tank. Is there any stone around them???
JD
|
193.682 | Dig, dig, dig... | TALLIS::PARADIS | There's a feature in my soup! | Sun May 09 1993 00:33 | 27 |
| Resurrecting an old note....
We just bought some land in Phillipston, MA that we'd eventually like
to build on. As far as we know, it MIGHT have been perked a long time
ago, but any results have expired and they're certainly not on file at
town hall.
Phillipston only allows perks to be done October through May. We only
learned of this restriction a couple of days ago, and needless to say
all the engineers we've talked to are booked solid for May. However,
we'd like to do a quick-and-dirty unofficial perk ourselves in order to
find the most likely spots to point the engineer at come October 8-)
That said, I have a question about .4:
>They remove all topsoil and go down to a certain depth. In my case a
>back hoe dug a hole about 4' deep. Then at the bottom of that hole,
>the engineer dug a hole about 10" in diameter and about another two
>feet deep...
Was the initial 4' excavation done *so as to remove the topsoil* or was
it done *after the topsoil had been removed*?
Anyone else got any other suggestions on doing a DIY perk? 8-)
--jim
|
193.683 | dig deep!! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon May 10 1993 07:41 | 11 |
|
Jim,
Find out what the town requires for a deep hole test. I had
to go 10' and the second was a foot. If for have to go deeper
then 4' and run into ledge or water, you might be out a few buck
if you own the problem...
JD
|
193.684 | Perc test 101 | COAL05::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Mon May 10 1993 13:48 | 22 |
| The "perc" test is looking for 2 things. One is where does the ground
water level start and 2 how fast will your soil accept water (how fast does it
perc.) Each town has different requirements of each of these factors. Check
with your town...
Typically they dig deep to find the ground water (or ledge), then the
perc hole has to be at least "x" feet above that and "y" feet below grade (the
surface.)
They keep the test hole (the one that checks the perc rate) filled with
water for some period of time (30 min to an hour) to make sure it's adequately
saturated. Then they start the "perc rate" test. Here they fill the same hole
with water to a fixed level and measure how many inches of water are absorbed by
the soil in a given period of time (e.g. 3 inches in 5 min.) Again each town
has their own rules as to exactly what the test requirements are... Check with
your town.
FWIW the town where I had the perc test done required a licensed engineer to
do the test and the building inspector only watched and verified the results.
Al
|
193.685 | Right concepts... slighly wrong terminology. | MARX::SULLIVAN | We have met the enemy,and they is us! | Wed May 12 1993 09:36 | 22 |
| re .-1
Your descriptions are correct, but you are confusing two different tests.
There are "deep hole" tests and "perc" tests.
As you stated, the deep hole test is done to determine the ground water level.
In this area (Bolton, MA.) these are only allowed in March and April. What
they are trying to determine is what is the HIGHEST groundwater level
during the year. Once this is established, your leeching field and tank
must be 4' above this. They are ensuring that they will always be higher
than the groundwater. Neither one would do much good if they were under
water. In the ideal case, you hit water in the 9-10' range. This allows
you to have a trench system (leeching pipes in dug trenches) rather than
going through the expense of bringing in fill to raise the level of the
field.
Perc tests are done to establish the percolation rate of your soil (i.e.
how fast does water percolate down through the soil. In this area, these
can be done at any time during the year. They are usually done at the same
time as the deep holes since the engineer and backhoe are already there.
Mark
|
193.686 | | UPSAR::WALLACE | Vince Wallace | Wed May 12 1993 12:45 | 6 |
| How far your leach field must be above the water table is determined
by the town (at least in Mass). I believe 4' is the minimum
standard set by the state, but individual towns can require more.
Some towns may also vary their requirements from year to year. For
example, if its been a wet spring they may accept 4', but if its
been a dry spring they might insist on 5'.
|
193.687 | moneyinahole | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu May 13 1993 08:54 | 6 |
|
Just to add to that. At least in my area, most of the
towns are going to a 4 bedroom size system. So plan
on spending some bucks........
JD
|
193.348 | How about a little bit o' bleach? | TLE::PIC9::allen | Christopher Allen, DEC COBOL, ZKO 381-0864 | Fri Aug 06 1993 14:03 | 10 |
| While browsing in this topic, I read someone mention that one shouldn't use
bleach "with every load of laundry water", as all the bleach would kill off the
bacteria.
What about using a dollop or so of bleach to help clean the toilets every few
weeks? Would this little bit of bleach be OK, that is, not enough to do
serious harm?
-Chris
|
193.349 | Sounds okay | CADSYS::FLEECE::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Fri Aug 06 1993 14:31 | 9 |
| I use bleach in one laundry load every couple of weeks or so, in one out of
every 10-12 loads of wash or even more. So far I've never had problems with
a septic tank. In fact, when it was pumped, the people have said it was in
fine shape.
So what you suggest is probably okay. I've never needed bleach in the bathroom,
since I don't have a mildew problem. Why do you need it for your toilet?
Elaine
|
193.350 | | SSGV02::ANDERSEN | Figures lie and liars figure. | Fri Aug 06 1993 16:27 | 1 |
| My wife will put bleach in the toilet overnight to help clean it.
|
193.351 | | CADSYS::FLEECE::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Fri Aug 06 1993 17:10 | 13 |
| If you have a septic system and are concerned about bleach impacting your
little anaerobic bacteria friends, there are many bathroom and toilet bowl
cleaners which do not contain bleach.
Although Consumer Reports recommends Spic 'N Span Pine for all bathroom cleaning
needs.
And you don't have to worry about getting a drip on your clothes, rugs, towels,
and whatever!
just MHO
Elaine
|
193.352 | plantings near leach fields | SALEM::DANCONA | | Tue Aug 10 1993 09:23 | 5 |
| is there any rule of thumb.. on types of plants/trees that
can be planted on or near leachfields ???
|
193.353 | Avoid "Weeping" Willow trees | MVDS00::GOETZ | | Tue Aug 10 1993 09:58 | 5 |
| Do ** NOT ** plant a willow tree anywhere near a septic tank or
leach field. The roots WILL find and infiltrate the pipes and
grow enough to block the pipes.
|
193.354 | I'm the bleach queen | MKOTS1::RASMUSSEN | | Wed Aug 11 1993 12:24 | 9 |
| When my husband and I were in the process of buying our first house,
the guy who inspected the house (Paul Cornell, who else?) told me that
approximately 1 qt. of bleach per month is ok to use in a septic. I
try to keep it less than that, but I'm a bleach freak...love those
WHITES.
So, a little bit of bleach in a toilet should be fine.
Sue Rasmussen
|
193.562 | self-contained septic systems | STARCH::HAGERMAN | Flames to /dev/null | Thu Sep 09 1993 13:45 | 13 |
| Is there any new technology to report on the self-contained septic
system front? We are considering a cottage in Marion that has a
cesspool, and in looking around at other places it appears that one
result of the hurricane last year was a surge in this type of system.
Apparently there is a guy in Rochester who constructs them using a
double wall tank, a liquid drain pipe into some kind of drywell (not
sure how that's different from a leeching field), and a bunch of alarms
and pumps. I'd like to hear if anyone has recent experience in this
area.
Thanks.
Doug.
|
193.563 | | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Sep 10 1993 08:31 | 10 |
|
I've seen a system something like this. It has a main tank and
instead of a leach field with the pipe,sand and stone. It has
as system of drywell. But it was not near a lake and had no
alarms or pumps. I suspect that the only reason the pumps/alarm are
there is to monitor each drywell. When one is full, the system will
pump into another. Just hope the float dont get stuck in on in
one of the wells....."there she blows!!!"":)
JD
|
193.673 | figures??? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Oct 08 1993 10:24 | 9 |
|
Just looking quick.....
Does anyone have a recent figure on their system? LIke....
6 min perk....took x sq' or area. x tons of stone. x number of
finger from D box and cost??????????
JD
|
193.674 | This is for Florissant Colorado | COOKIE::LAWSON | Carpe Heli Diem, eh? | Tue Oct 12 1993 21:57 | 10 |
| My perc was 9.5 minutes per inch ... considered very good for this area.
My system was installed for a four-bedroom house up to four people living in it
at all times. All applicable appliances.
The tank is 1500 gallons, and the field is 16 bio-diffusers (I'd never heard of
them before this). Essentially a 64'x3' diameter hollow half-pipe buried 4'
below the surface. There are holes in the heavey black plastic for evaporation.
Total price: $3500.
|
193.355 | leach pits | USCTR1::BJORGENSEN | | Tue Oct 12 1993 22:09 | 22 |
| I was just wondering if anyone has had any successes with septic tank or
leach field additives. I have a leach pit. It's 2000 gal cylinder type tank
with holes at 6 inch intervals around the circumference of the tank. The
holes are about 1 inch in diameter. My problem is this. The tank is about
8 feet deep, and is about half full with liquid, suggesting that the
holes in the lower half of the tank are plugged. The guy that just pumped
my tank said it could last another 10 years or more just the way it is.
My soil is very sandy and I'm not near the ground water level. My tank was
never pumped (the house was built in 1968) and I just think that grease and
or solids worked their way into the leach tank and plugged the wholes. I was
wondering if the "Acid Treatment" would work in the case. The guy running the
tank pumping bus. recommended Robic K-57 tank cleaner. I put it in three days
ago and there is little change. The level in the tank is going down about an
inch per day. No new liquids are going into the tank yet, as the 1k gal
septic tank is not yet full.
If any such treatment works, is there someone in the Bolton/Harvard area
that can administer it? Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Brian
|
193.356 | Stinks $$$$$$ | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Oct 13 1993 07:46 | 10 |
|
....ya. save some money! With the new laws going on the books
in January, your cesspool will have to be upgraded to a tank and
leach field. Unless you can tap into the town system.....
From what I understand.... this "new" code will cost Joe Average
home owner some money...
JD
|
193.357 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Oct 13 1993 09:19 | 14 |
| RE: .214
That is a leach pit...*NOT* a cesspool.
A cesspool is a hole, stone or cement lined with holes. The waste goes
directly into the cesspool, where the liquid filters into the soil.
A leach pit is an alternative to a leaching field. The output from the
septic tank flows into the leach pit, then into the soil.
The difference is that the septic tank helps breakdown the waste
*prior* to the waste going into the soil.
Marc H.
|
193.358 | Used Robic with good results | VICKI::DODIER | Cars suck, then they die | Wed Oct 13 1993 10:40 | 15 |
| I've used the Robic product with a leach field system with good
results. If there is a particularly wet spring (like last year) the leach
field can get saturated. When that happens, a lot of the micro-organisms
that make the system work die (suffocate.)
The Robic is supposedly nothing more than a liquid that replenishes
the mirco-organisms (i.e. nematodes, active cultures) if it is the same
thing I used. I'm not sure if you'll get the same results with a leach
pit though.
This is more of a maintenance product and is not meant as a permanent
fix. If a leach field continues to get, and stay, saturated then it'll
have to be worked on. Again, not sure how this applies to a leach pit.
Ray
|
193.359 | It a *LEACH* PIT | USCTR1::BJORGENSEN | | Wed Oct 13 1993 10:44 | 19 |
| Marc,
You are correct. I'm adding a second floor to my 54x32 ranch and this is
actually how the whole thing started. I went to the board of health and
asked if my system would accommodate 4 new bedrooms. They pulled the
plane and said, "absolutely you have a 8x14 leach pit." Although
they didn't come right out and say it, they implied that this was a better
system than a field set up. (certainly a lot easier to inspect!) Anyway,
the BOH wrote a letter saying that I was okay for up to 5 bedrooms, so I'm
all set building-wise. During this process, I thought it would be a good idea
to have my tank pumped, so I did. I also dug up the cover to the pit to
have that inspected (separate, and much larger than the septic tank). This
is when I discovered that it was about half full.The guy pumping my tank said
it was not abnormal for 25 years of use, and thought it could last anothers
10 years or more.... I would, however, like to get the lower part of the
tank leaching again if possible. I'm wondering if the "acid treatment would
work in this case.
Brian J.
|
193.360 | Go for the easy fix, first... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Thu Oct 14 1993 00:47 | 5 |
| Dump a box of Rid-X in the leach tank and wait a couple of
weeks. If it doesn't work, you're out about $5.50 and still
have 9 yrs. 11� months to fix it.
Tim
|
193.361 | Cap or not? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Oct 14 1993 14:13 | 12 |
|
Quick question.. In newer constructed spetic tanks, there are
"t's" on the in and outlet pipes of the box. Are the "T's"
open at the top or is it caped???
--- Cap or no cap?
| |
----- |
----- |
| |
| |
|
193.362 | Hydrogen Peroxide? | WMOIS::RICE_J | | Thu Oct 14 1993 15:31 | 17 |
| Some of the previous replies mentioned using hydrogen peroxide in septic
systems. I am not having septic problems, but do have some hydrogen peroxide
on hand. When it was purchased, the chemical company suggested that dumping
it in the septic system when I was through with it would be good for the
system (I have approximately 30 gallons).
Would this be of any benefit, since I have not had septic problems, or
would it be harmful in any way?
My assumption is that it would kill the bacteria, which doesn't seem like
a good thing to do.
Any opinions?
Joseph
|
193.363 | T's open on top | DELNI::HICKOX | N1KTX | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:26 | 8 |
|
RE: .219
If I am correct, the T's should be open on top to allow venting
via your waste pipe (up through the roof of the house). This prevents
a dangerous build-up of sewer gases in the system.
Mark
|
193.364 | new code upgrade | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Oct 15 1993 07:48 | 10 |
|
Ok, mybe I didnt make the question clear. I understand about
venting... But "Looking" into the newer tanks, the T pipe( Ihave
an older tank with baffles) on the inlet and outlet pipes. Do they
have a cap on the top of that pip or just go high enought reach
the top of the tank??? The inlet must reach 10" down into the
tank and 19" for the outlet. Needless to say I have to install
them. Can I buy them or do I have to make them??????
JD
|
193.365 | NO CAPS! | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Fri Oct 15 1993 09:29 | 26 |
| Re: inlet and outlet "T"s
They have NO CAP.
Normal operation on the outlet side is for liquid to flow up into the "t" and
out the pipe. The top of the "t" acts as an overflow if/when the system is
overworked or the lower section gets clogged. (This would be bad as the
Sludge/Scum would enter your leach pipes and potentially clog them.
| |
| |~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------+ | ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_- Waste -_-_|~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
<----------- -_-_-| ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_- Water -_-_|~ ~ ~ ~ Sludge / Scum ~ ~ ~
---------+-_-| ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
|_^_|_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
|-|-|-_-_-_-_ Waste Water -_-_-
-_|_-_-_-_-_-_-_-/-_-_-_-_-_-_
\_____________/
On the input side the "t" primarily acts as a flow damper to divert the flow
down to the bottom of the tank thus preventing the sludge/scum from being
re-mixed into the waste water.
|
193.366 | tanks! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Oct 15 1993 12:54 | 7 |
|
re:
Thanks! I needed that.:) Guess whats up for the weekend..
That jobs gonna stink!!!! But I guess i'll have to do it!!!
JD
|
193.632 | Mandatory MA septic inspections? | WLDBIL::KILGORE | Dysfunctional DCU relationship | Fri Oct 22 1993 16:33 | 7 |
|
Home-owners in Massachusetts are well advised to tune into the
discussion is 12DOT2::MASSACHUSETTS, note 1601.
The discussion regards a proposed state ragulation that would require
periodic (1-3 year) septic system inspections.
|
193.96 | Closet=Bedroom? | ZEKE::MCCOY | | Mon Mar 14 1994 11:28 | 21 |
|
This is an old note, but seems the most appropriate spot for this
question.
We are converting a ranch to a cape in Brookline, NH. There is
currently three bedrooms downstairs. We are enlarging the living
room and losing one small bedroom. The other will be converted to
an office/den. We will be left with one bedroom downstairs. The
addition will include three bedrooms upstairs. We have been told
that we can add one bedroom in Brookline without having to alter
the existing septic system... an expense we dearly want to avoid.
The contractor is not sure what constitutes a bedroom. I don't
want the building inpsector to count the office/den as a bedroom.
It really will be an office by the way. There is currently a closet
in the den, do we need to remove this, or does a closet define a room
as a bedroom? Anyone have experience with this in Brookline?
Thanks,
Tim
|
193.97 | | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Mon Mar 14 1994 12:37 | 3 |
| Not specific to your town, but it is my understanding that a closet in
a room makes it a bedroom. Tons of potential exceptions, but that is
typically what the rule says.
|
193.98 | closet or FULL bathroom | CACHE::BEAUREGARD | Roger Beauregard | Mon Mar 14 1994 13:24 | 6 |
| I went through this a few years ago when finishing off my basement. I
was told by the building inspector (MA) that if there is a closet or
FULL bath off the room, it's considered a bedroom. I moved the closet.
Roger
|
193.99 | New owners might have 6 kids - all girls) | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Mon Mar 14 1994 15:08 | 12 |
| > The contractor is not sure what constitutes a bedroom. I don't
> want the building inpsector to count the office/den as a bedroom.
> It really will be an office by the way. There is currently a closet
> in the den, do we need to remove this, or does a closet define a room
> as a bedroom? Anyone have experience with this in Brookline?
You may not be "using" it as a bedroom but the folks you sell the house to
a few years down the road might. If the septic system is not upgraded for
the potential usage, it usually constitutes a code violation.
In fact, I believe the septic system must be upgraded BEFORE the addition
can be added. It's that way in most towns.
|
193.100 | The definition is a trifle limiting... | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Mon Mar 14 1994 15:14 | 6 |
| Well, my previous 1820-vintage house had no closets in the bedrooms,
and the bathroom was downstairs. I guess that means they weren't
bedrooms! But the kitchen had a closet in it, and the bathroom was
right off the kitchen. So maybe I should have been sleeping in the
kitchen and cooking in the bedroom fireplace.
|
193.101 | and we'll leave the light on forya! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Mar 15 1994 07:45 | 8 |
|
Closet in a room makes it a bedroom????
OH my. I've been living in a motel all this time!!!!!
J(motel 6) D
|
193.102 | Goodbye closet | ZEKE::MCCOY | | Tue Mar 15 1994 08:28 | 5 |
| Thanks for the replys. Sounds like I'll be removing the small closet
to avoid a septic system... As a side note, the room will not even
have a door on it, it will have an open arch- but as someone already
mentioned, the next owner could add a door and use it as a bedroom.
|
193.103 | | PROGID::allen | Christopher Allen, DEC COBOL, ZKO 381-0864 | Tue Mar 15 1994 08:59 | 4 |
| Why don't you just approach your building inspector friendly-like and explain
your situation? He might be able to suggest alternative solutions. For
example: would removing the closet door (and having the shelves exposed to the
room) make it not-a-closet?
|
193.367 | Septic Inspections | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Thu Apr 21 1994 09:17 | 23 |
| Hi,
I'm in the process of purchasing a house with a septic system and I want
to get it inspected. Unfortunately I need to have this done fairly quickly so I
don't have time right now to read all the notes on septic systems. Hope I'm not
repeating something asked elsewhere.
I called several inspectors and they said that the cost would be about
$120 for the inspection and another $100 or so if the tank needs to be pumped.
One state certified contractor said the inspection would be $120 including
pumping and looking at the tank, baffles etc., flushing toilets to check flow,
making sure that there was nothing running back from the leech field into the
tank.
One thing that this guy doesn't do is dig the leech field. He said at
this time of year with all the rain and show melt doing that can give false
results. The other people I called said that they would dig a hole in the field
to test the stone. What do you think? Does the first guy sound ok? It's B&D
Septic by the way. Comments good or bad are appreciated.
Thanks,
George
|
193.368 | Septic Inspection Continued | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Thu Apr 21 1994 09:22 | 5 |
| Oh yeah, the house is 8 years old. Current residents have 5 children for a
total of 7 in the household. I pulled the septic permit and it says the septic
was built for a 3 bedroom house, the house has 4 bedrooms. Is this a problem?
George
|
193.369 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Apr 21 1994 09:41 | 6 |
| RE: .226
No
Marc H.
|
193.370 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Apr 21 1994 09:45 | 12 |
| RE: .225
I really don't think that a septic "inspection" can tell you much
more than the system is working correctly....i.e. sludge level
is below input pipe, baffles are not cloged.
I would check with the town and look at the septic plans that were
filed with either the board of health or the town engineer.
Look the design over and if needed have a civil engineer review
them. Check to see when/if the deep hole test was done.
Marc H.
|
193.371 | Probably already covered, but why are YOU paying? | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Thu Apr 21 1994 16:28 | 14 |
| I'd suggest reading the replies. It's be a lot faster than waiting for
someone qualified to answer your questions to get his head screwed back on
and answer your question, especially after you told him you didn't have time
to check first. ...at least that's what Benny just said and he's a part
time health board inspector.
Actually, his words were "hey, get a load of this ****."
Thought you might like to know.......
BTW, Isn't the seller supposed to have the septic system inspected in order
to sell his home? Is this in Mass? Why are you paying for this?
|
193.372 | | MROA::MACKEY | | Thu Apr 21 1994 17:26 | 5 |
| I purchased in Mass last year and at that time I payed for the
inspection but the seller had to pay to have his OWN trash removed.
Only makes sense.
|
193.373 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Thu Apr 21 1994 17:37 | 12 |
| > I purchased in Mass last year and at that time I payed for the
> inspection but the seller had to pay to have his OWN trash removed.
"the seller had to pay"? Really? Is this a new law in Mass? We bought (in
Mass) about 2 years ago and there was no requirement by anyone to check out
the septic system.
(We did anyway - at our own expense. And we also had it pumped since the
owners had never had it done in 4 years - with up to 8 people living there
at times.)
Dan
|
193.374 | | MROA::MACKEY | | Fri Apr 22 1994 10:08 | 7 |
| I cannot remember if they had to or if they were being nice (i doubt
that). There were strange things in the closing that they had to pay
for since the property was in Worcester County. It ended up being
a 2000 gallon tank so I was glad they paid. I was also nice and
found a coupon in the phone book given $XX off the removal charge
which I gave to the seller to use.
|
193.375 | worth checking into! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Apr 22 1994 12:35 | 11 |
|
I believe the sell will pay if you requesst the tank be cleaned.
but you pay for the inspection..... As far as testing goes, I
was told by, I believe "Rutland Sanitation"?? or someone local
to that area, they pump it out and put 1000gals of water into
the leach field to see if with will take it...... So the part
abuot maybe getting an engineer to look it over would be bad advise
also. He can look at the plans and evaluate it. I dont know if
he'll do any field test???
JD
|
193.376 | Put it in P&S | DELNI::HICKOX | N1KTX | Fri Apr 22 1994 14:11 | 14 |
|
This would be something you would want to put into a P&S, that the
seller will have the system inspected and certified ok before closing.
We did this, they found a broken baffle (always happens) and they
(the seller) paid for inspection and repair because that's the way
we drew up the agreement. You can put anything into a P&S, its just
a matter of what the seller will accept (i.e. subject to septic system
inspection paid for by seller, home inspection, water quality test when
its well water, etc..).
Have fun.
Mark
|
193.377 | | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Fri Apr 22 1994 16:51 | 13 |
| One of the guys in my car club tried to sell his home in Stow. The state
MADE HIM DO A SEPTIC INSPECTION before he could list it. Something to do
with septic systems over 5 or 10 years old.
Who was he selling the house to, you ask? His SON.
He wound up tearing up the entire front yard to replace the system and his
son, needing a place in a hurry, bought somewhere else instead.
This was about 3 years ago. FWIW.
Perhaps you should look into the law that went into effect about three or 4
years ago.
|
193.378 | | GAVEL::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Fri Apr 22 1994 17:46 | 6 |
| re: .227 re: .226
Are you sure it's not a problem if the septic permit is for less bedrooms
than the house has? I would check into that one VERY carefully.
Clay
|
193.379 | septic tanks keeps filling up! | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Wed May 04 1994 10:56 | 35 |
| I guess using this note is as good as any.
The story...
After a long snowy winter, and the ground was all thawed and snow
melted, I noticed that water was bubbling out of my leach field
every time we flushed, or my wife was emptying the washing machine.
I just had the tank pumped (1500 gallons from the septic and drain-
back of the leach field) last October (about 5-6 months ago). So,
I called a few septic places and they all told me this was normal
after a snowy winter, the goundwater somehow gets into the septic
and fills it up. This didn't make sense to me because the previous
owners hadn't pumped it out for 3-4 years and I remember a few
snowy winters in that time. So, I took off the cover, and sure
enough the tank was full right up to the pipe that drains to the leach
field, hence the overflow every time new waste was emptied into the
septic. I had no choice but to have them come down and pump another
1500 gallons.
Now the problem...
Less than 2 weeks since I had it pumped, it's full again!! and bubbling
out the leach field. I know we had some torrential rains last week
which flooded my yard, but it couldn't have filled up the septic tank!
And this has never happened in the past. There is no leak in the house
causing a constant drainage to the system ( like a faucet or toilet
running constantly). I don't understand how it could fill up so quick.
I was with the septic guy and watched him empty it.
Any ideas!!??
Thanks,
John
|
193.380 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Software Engineering Process Group | Wed May 04 1994 11:20 | 27 |
| It's normal for the level to be right up to the pipe
that goes from the tank to the leach field. It's not normal
for it to get that high so soon after pumping the tank, though
it could happen. That would require a water usage of 107 gal/day,
which is consistent with the "standard" number of 55 gal/day/person,
assuming two people in the house, but the standard number is
inflated. Nevertheless, you may want to do some calculations
to determine what your actual usage is. Also, consider inspecting
the tank soon after it's pumped, to see if you can tell where the
water is coming from.
It sounds like water in your leach field may not be draining into
the ground. This can happen when the field fails, as the result of
particulates clogging the drainage paths. It can also happen
for other reasons, such as unusually high water table or design
failures. It doesn't sound like a broken pipe, since then the
water would bubble in that one area, not the entire field. It's
also possible that there's some other explantion, so don't assume that
this speculation is correct.
Have someone come out who is qualified to examine the state of the leach
field. I should warn you that this is potentially very expensive. Also,
if it appears that raw septage is going into the ground water, the local
Board of Health may require emergency action (like weekly pumping until
it's fixed).
Gary
|
193.381 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed May 04 1994 11:41 | 11 |
| RE: .237
How old is the septic system? Was a deep hole test performed before
the field was installed? Do you have a copy of the filed plan
from the town?
My septic system has 7 people on it...plus two teenagers who go into a
trance when in the shower. I've had no problems at all with the winter
snow/etc. Plus, I live with a stream/wetlands in my backyard.
Marc H.
|
193.382 | we have 6 in the family | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Wed May 04 1994 12:22 | 20 |
| The house is 40 years old and the septic system has been there for
at least 15-20 years with no problems. Like I said the last people
who lived there didn't need it pumped for 3-4 years in between.
Could it be that the leach field just isn't working properly and
is clogged or something? Is it time for an acid treatment?
I know the pipe seems to be ok from the septic tank to the leach
field, because I was there when they pumped it, and they showed
me the water coming back into the tank from the leach field quite
rapidly, and they said it isn't clogged.
What would cause the leach field to start not working properly after
working well in the past?
We have town sewerage in the street. I think it's time to start
thinking of hooking up. Anyone know how much to hook up to existing
town sewerage, and any reasonable contractors. I live in Auburn, MA.
Thanks,
John
|
193.383 | | BARSTR::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Wed May 04 1994 13:07 | 25 |
| re: .237
Where are you located? This seems a bit late for this to be happening.
We are in the greater Maynard area. The same thing has happened to us the
last two years. The leach field was replaced about 7 years ago, and we don't
believe it to be failing.
In both of the last two years in New England, there were heavy, late snows,
and heavy rains before the ground had defrosted much. The result for us was
that the leach field was essentially a "bathtub" surrounded by ice. When the
water table got above the level of the pipe from the septic tank to the leach
field, it simply backed up. After one pumping, I could literally see (yes, I
stuck my head in) and hear the water coming back in.
Last year we had the septic tank pumped several times. Broke my heart to pay
them to pump, effectively, rainwater. This year, the heavy rains didn't last
quite so long. What we did was drastically cut back on water usage. Didn't
flush the toilets except when absolutely necessary; I took my showers at
work, and my wife and kids went for swims at a local health club; we did our
laundary at a laudromat; we washed our dishes in a tub by hand and dumped the
water outside; all this enabled us to get away with only one pumping. We
checked the level of the water in the septic tank a couple of times a day.
Clay
|
193.384 | I think I am starting to understand how it works | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Wed May 04 1994 13:57 | 46 |
| You'll have to excuse my ignorance of septic systems and how they work.
I am a new first-time homeowner. But now I think I am starting to
understand how these things work. I am going to try to explain my
understandings of how it works (keep me in check if I go off base).
Let me know if these assumptions are correct.
It sounds like they are *supposed* to be full (at least when they are
emptied, they fill up rather quick and stay that way for a long time).
It is then the leach field that keeps the water skimming off the top
and dispersing in the ground througout the leach field. The solid waste
gets eaten by bacteria and mostly sinks to the bottom. You should only
get it pumped when you suspect there is quite a bit of solid waste
at the bottom, hence the 3-4 years sounds like an appropriate time
for this kind of solid waste sludge buildup.
Obviously, you don't want to get the septic tank pumped out every time
it fills up with water or you would be in dept from pumping out every
2 weeks! Here is my family's estimate on how fast the tank fills. Let's
just say it is a 1,000 gallon tank. This is for 6 people.
The toilet alone, I don't know how much water a toilet tank holds,
let's say 5 gallon. If everyone in the family only went and flushed
3 times per day (low estimate), that's 6 times 3 = 18 flushes times
5 gallons = 90 gallons per day alone! Multiply that by 7 days per
week. We have the potential of 630 gallons per week going into the
septic just from flushing the toilet!
Now my wife likes to wash. We have the extra large load washer. Let's
say it holds 10 gallons times 2 for the wash and rinse cycle = 20
gallons per load. She washes a couple of times per week, let's say
up to 5 loads per wash. That could easily get up to 200 gallons per
week just washing clothes!
Now I haven't even included showers, baths, sinks, etc..
We have the potential to fill up the septic tank every week! So now
I am understanding that part of how it works is that it fills up
quick and stays full, then working with the leach field.
So my guess is my leach field is somehow not leaching correctly. Is
this when an acid treatment is necessary? It has never bubbled up like
this all last year, and has me wondering the cause of it.
Thanks for the insight
John
|
193.385 | all wet! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed May 04 1994 14:30 | 12 |
|
I had a problem like that a few years ago when the direction
of the snow melt went over the leachfield. Shifting that
path and not leaving plowing the snow there fixed the problem.
Their has been a lot of serface water this year becasue of
the snow and rain. You might was to walk around and check
you grade and see if for some reason you have excess water
leaching in for someplace.
Times like this, i'm glad my washer is in a dry well!
JD
|
193.386 | ...or perhaps a bugus percolation test for a building permit | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Wed May 04 1994 14:59 | 8 |
|
What kind of construction has been going on in your neighborhood? Perhaps
something's been built that's drastically altered the run-off in your
neighborhood. i.e diversion of an underground spring as a result of a
foundation erection, diversion of spring runoff as a result of grade
changes, etc.
|
193.387 | | STRATA::JOERILEY | Legalize Freedom | Thu May 05 1994 04:40 | 10 |
|
I had what sounds like your problem a few years back. In my case
the soil in the leaching area had clogged up and when the water
couldn't go down so it went to the side once that clogged up it had no
where to go but up which isn't good. I had to remove and replace the
entire leaching field, this is quite expensive so my advise to you is
call someone who knows their business and have it inspected before you
have anymore damage than might already be there.
Joe
|
193.388 | Save (in more ways than one)... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Thu May 05 1994 04:53 | 12 |
| An older toilet probably dumps ~4 gallons per flush. A new
toilet is usually 1.6 gallons. A washing machine probably holds
20 to 25 gallons with clothes (up to 50 gallons a load). A front
loader uses about half the water (and costs twice as much). A
standard shower head flows ~4 GPM. Water saver head flows <2.5
GPM.
Reducing your water usage might not eliminate your problem,
but it should reduce it. Changing some fixtures and habits would
be worth looking into. At the very least, your water bill would
go down.
Tim
|
193.389 | | BARSTR::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Thu May 05 1994 10:02 | 31 |
| > It sounds like they are *supposed* to be full (at least when they are
> emptied, they fill up rather quick and stay that way for a long time).
> It is then the leach field that keeps the water skimming off the top
> and dispersing in the ground througout the leach field.
The second sentence is right. The first sentence is almost right. In normal
operation, it will be full up to the level of the outlet pipe, which is below
the top of the septic tank. The water level should also be below the level
of the inlet pipe from the house, which is above the level of the outlet
pipe.
If the water level is above the level of the outlet pipe, but below the level
of inlet pipe, that's not good (the waste water isn't going to the leach
field), but the waste water is at least flowing into the septic tank; it's
not a problem unless there are a lot of solids in the tank. (Of course it's
impossible to know exactly whether or not it's above the level of the outlet
pipe unless you have some sort of gauge, or if you're a very adventurous
scuba diver.)
If the water level is above the level of the inlet pipe, that's bad, because
the waste water isn't flowing into the septic tank, at least not very fast.
It's probably sitting there in the pipes, and eventually the tank will
overflow and dump (literally) crap onto your lawn.
If the local water table is above the level of the outlet pipe, the leach
field will essentially work backwards; that is water will flow INTO the
septic tank FROM the the leach field. That's what happened to us.
Clay
|
193.390 | HOOK UP NOW! | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Thu May 05 1994 10:10 | 34 |
|
TIME OUT !
You say you've got TOWN SEWAGE on the street?!?!? Hook up yesterday and leave
your septic worries behind! "Normal" life span for a septic is ~30 years so
you're headed for "end of life" somewhere along the line. You'll pay a hook-up
fee (call the Board Of Health or Water/Sewer department for the $$$) - this fee
is, I believe, added to the base cost of your home when you figure the capitol
gains when you sell it (a + for your bottom line). You'll pay a "Sewer Users
Fee" of some sort - again check with the town.
I appreciate this thread - I've got a 30+ year old septic with the home we
bought last fall and it's my first septic........ when shopping for a home I
REALLY wanted town sewer & town water but the community in which we wanted to
buy only had those services on the "wrong" side of town. I would expect you
to realize an improvement in "salability" and peace-of-mind once you hook up.
AND you'll be able to use your garbage dispose-all with out the worry of
clogging your leach field!!!!! I, for example, no longer rinse water soluble
paint off brushes in the sink and very seldom use the dispose-all that came
with the house....... You'll even be able to flush those products advertised
as "flushable" ............ there's a BIG difference between "flushable" and
"Septic Safe" / "Bio-Degradable" ; "flushable" is a marketing gimmick ONLY and
just means the item won't clog the discharge pipe from your toilet it DOESN'T
mean the product will succumb to the bacterial activity in your tank - it
probably will just float around in there posing a risk of entering the leaching
pipes and clogging them. "Septic Safe" or "Biodegradable" are the ONLY
products that should be introduced to your septic system - AND THIS INCLUDES
your toilet paper and laundry soaps!!!!!!!!!
- jw
|
193.391 | Tight-Tank..... | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Thu May 05 1994 10:17 | 7 |
|
....... Oh yes; If you HAD to empty the tank every time it filled up you'd
be dealing with a "Tight Tank". Tight Tanks have no leach
field (too much ledge, poor drainage, wetlands etc. etc.),
are not very common and carry a formidable ongoing cost...
|
193.392 | Septic system depth? | DFSAXP::JP | And the winner is.... | Thu May 05 1994 13:10 | 6 |
| How deep are the parts of a septic system supposed to be buried.
We are planning on tilling a lot of the front yard, which contains my septic
tank and leach field. I've uncovered my septic tank before and found it to be
less than a foot below the surface. What can I expect for the downstram
components?
|
193.393 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Software Engineering Process Group | Thu May 05 1994 13:52 | 16 |
| re: .250
Not very far. The bacteria that act in a leach field are aerobic,
meaning they need air. You might be able to till the area without
damaging the system, but I wouldn't do it without first finding some
of the pipes and measuring manually. I wouldn't trust designs, plans,
rules of thumb, etc.
But why are you planning on tilling? That's sometimes reasonable for
a lawn, if you're prepared to do something about the weeds that you'll
bring to the surface, but it may not be necessary. If you're planning
on planting something other than grass, think very carefully. You don't
want to plant anything with roots that will get into the leach system,
potentially clogging it. Many vegetables fall into that category.
Gary
|
193.394 | | DFSAXP::JP | And the winner is.... | Thu May 05 1994 14:10 | 6 |
| Most of the area tilled will be uphill from the septic system. At the far edge
of the yard, the ground slopes up to the road. My concern is when we are at the
low end of the slope, I'm not sure how close to the leach are we'll be. The
plan filed with the town is pretty useless. It has several known
inconsistencies, like location of the house and driveway. The town is not
concerned with these inconsistencies, by the way. I've asked.
|
193.395 | 12" to 18" not more than 24" | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Fri May 06 1994 09:18 | 8 |
|
Leach fields are 12" to 18" below grade to a max of 24" this is quite close
to the surface. A tiller can cut 12" deep without any problem. If you
compromise the integrity of the soil to close to the leach pipe you MAY cause
a break out where the leachate takes "the path of least resistance" and
percolates out into/from the newly loosened soil......
- jw
|
193.113 | | STRATA::JOERILEY | Legalize Freedom | Wed Jun 01 1994 07:35 | 17 |
|
After reading all the reply's to the base note I don't see where
anybody has really answered Dwight's question about how lint impacts
his septic system. I recently had the misfortune to buy a new washer
as the old one had the nerve to die after only 8 or 9 years of use.
It's been in use for just over a week now and I noticed that unlike the
old washer it doesn't have a lint trap. The old washer had a trap that
you emptied every 2 or 3 loads the new washer (according to sales
person) has some kind of automatic system that chops the lint up and
flushes it out with the last rinse. Having just spent well over 15K to
replace my leaching field just over 3 years ago I'm a bit concerned
what the lint will do to my system over time. The water table is to
high to put in a dry well for the washer so that option is out. Is
there some kind of filter sold I can put in the discharge line or is
this not a problem? Thanks
Joe
|
193.114 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Jun 01 1994 08:42 | 7 |
| Re: .9
I'm wondering the same thing. We discharge our washing machine into
a laundry sink, so if/when I get ambitious I think I'll make a
screen of some kind to fit over the sink drain to catch the lint.
I do wonder about all that lint going into the septic system.
|
193.115 | | STRATA::JOERILEY | Legalize Freedom | Thu Jun 02 1994 01:36 | 11 |
| RE: -1
If your discharging into a sink there's no problem just put an old
nylon over the end of the hose with a rubber band holding it. I did
that for years in my old apartment. I don't have that option
available now as I now discharge into a pipe about 4 or 5 feet over the
washer (had to splice two hoses together) there isn't any room for the
nylon to expand inside the pipe. I was hoping that there was some kind
of filter available to put in line.
Joe
|
193.633 | Septic system and water based stains | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Mon Jun 13 1994 16:01 | 9 |
| I am about to stain my house with a water based, solid color stain.
Normally when I clened my brushes etc. I would clean them in the sink and not
give it another thought. That was before I moved and became the owner of a
septic tank and leech field.
What do I do now? If I clean my brushes normally am I going to screw up my
septic system?
George
|
193.634 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Mon Jun 13 1994 16:28 | 6 |
| I would think that the amount of very-diluted stain which is going to get
into your sanitary system will probably not cause any trouble. If you
really want to be safe, use a brush cleaner instead. Although, I'm not
sure how you are supposed to go about disposing of that stuff, either.
-Jack
|
193.635 | think about your household cleaners | RANGER::SCHLENER | | Wed Jun 22 1994 09:43 | 5 |
| Probably your toilet cleaner, tile cleaner etc. and any bleach you use
in your wash are more harmful to the bacteria in your septic system
than the water based stain.
Cindy
|
193.636 | Another failed Septic system in Mass | REGENT::GRIGAS | | Fri Jun 24 1994 11:25 | 73 |
| Below is the history of events concerning my septic system and what I
am looking for is comments and choices I have from people that know the reg's or
have the experience:
In Sept 85 I bought a house in Millbury, Mass with a septic system.
The original septic plan showed a 7 minute perc with ground water 7 feet down.
In 1987 I put on an addition. I tried to move my leach field so I
could add on and performed a perc in another area of my land - the result
was a 45 minute perc and the town said this is unacceptable. So I put on a
small addition and in the process the excavator hit one of the leach fields;
and we discovered it was bloated (that is loaded with effluent and not
leaching well). (The escavator did fix the leach field after hitting it). I
also put my driveway over 1/2 of my leach field (which I know doesn't help but
the escavator said it was ok and he did the original leach field building for
the builder.)
Over the 8 years I pumped on average every 2 years (once I did not
for 4 years). There were no problems - no soggy grass, no backups.
Over the last 2 years I was trying to sell my home & my broker said not
to pump the system because a buyer needed to have the system checked under
normal conditions. Then recently I had a buyer and he had the system checked
by Northboro Septic (Andy Curtis). (I was not available when the system was
checked). Andy said the scum was on top of the tank - it had risen so high that
effectively it was leaching out of the cover opening; he said I was lucky it
didn't back up, and it was going to real soon. (I find it hard to believe that
he "showed up just in time" since I have never had a problem). Anyways, he
pumped down the tank below both T's and refilled with water. Since I have a
4 bedroom home he says that is 55 gal/person/day x 2 person/bedroom x 4 bedrooms
= 440 gal/day. So he said he should be able to put in over 200 gal at one time
to test. When he put that much in the leach field couldn;t leach it and the
water in the tank rose above the T's. Therefore he failed the system.
So to sell the house I had GreenHill engineering come out (with Andy
on backhoe) for a perc for a new system. What I had wanted to do was add on
to my existing system; there wasn't much room left in this area but my main
bone of contention was "I never had a problem". And I knew from the previous
perc in the only other area of my land (since I also have a well) that it had
failed. In the area of my present system they tried a deep hole and found
ground water within 3 1/2 feet and said this is no good. So, lo and behold,
they decided to retry and perc the other area of my land again. Things were
pretty much the same the perc started off with good expectations but after
4 hours we ended up with a 25 minute perc (which I think the boh said was
stretching the time in my favor). After when I went to pay I paid one check
to Northboro septic. Some estimates at this perc time ranged from: get a
variance to add drain to divert ground water, 10-15 trenches, 200 ft from
tank to leach field, $12k+.
So what should I do? I've read lots of notes files & discussions of
title V. I'm thinking I could pay for this expense, lawn ruining design and
still have a marginal system after it fills up. I certainly don't want a
holding tank - what do I want? - I guess I would like to just add onto my
present system and call it good enough. The only way I abused my system is
letting the scum go above the T's (that is we don't have disposal or put
grease in the system). All my neighbors did have problems (backing up) but
when they went to annual pumping the problem went away (I don't understand
how this stops the problem). Also I have heard I could acid treat but this
only is temp solution (and Andy says he wouldn't certify if he did an acid
treatment). I'm not sure if a 2nd opinion (someone put in less water at a
time would help); I believe all the testing (at least pumping) is recorded
at the boh by law. The system is only 9 years old.
Again "I have never had a problem".
If I add 200 gal at a time to my tank it does rise but within 4 hours is down
below the T's. Obviously, the original perc rate of 7 minutes & ground water
in that area of 7 feet seems impossible to me. As usual in these situations
everyone (city hall etc) seems to say "well I don't know about . . but you
should just put in another system.
comments, help, experience please.
-steve
|
193.637 | Don't move to Holden... | NRSTA2::RUSSO | | Fri Jun 24 1994 15:54 | 53 |
| All I can say is "Don't move to Holden".
I live in Holden where septic problems are at least as bad.
There is a sewer plan that we can not seem to get approved.
400 documented failures in 2 project areas.
Raw sewerage running down the streets.
People pleading at meetings to appeal to residents that their homes
are virtually uninhabitable with no solution.
The story goes on for ever.
I had a breakout problem (as does everyone in town wo/sewers). It was
to cost me $3605 for sewers but because it didn't get approved (3 times)
so it cost me $10K+ for a rebuild. 2 tanks, a pump, didn't perc in the
optimum place, etc. you name it it went wrong. Not to mention that fact
that when it does get approved we will have to pay again. That is of
course if it doesn't fail between now and then. It was installed in
1987 and has failed 3 times so far. Always electrical.
We may luck out. Because we happen to sit on the watershed for Watchusett
reservoir the MDC may pick up the tab.
Enough of Holden.
About your problem. I am sure that all this has been considered but here goes.
Building anything over a septic system is not good. It does not allow for
the EXTRA value of evaporation. (may not be the real problem, only helps)
Trees near systems are not good. Roots go for the water.
Should pump every 3-5 years, 2 years if you have an electrical pump.
If you can't get it to perc then it can be designed differntly. (you may
have already know this) The way i understand it is that the perc is to
tell the engineer how big, deep, technology, etc. to use. If it percs bad
the you make it large, near the surface, etc.
It it is real bad then they can excavate deep and replace clay with sand.
Another trick that they considered on my property is a ground water lowerer
(can you tell that I forgot the real name?). This is a trench that
is dug ahead of the leachfield and filled with stone in order to cause
ground water to drop as it approches the leach area. This would cause it
to perc much better.
All this is of course expensive and may require land area.
I understand the 'tight-tank' solution is very expensive and the costs
go on forever. I would resort to that only if all else fails.
Not sure if this helps. It is a damned if you do and damned if you don't
situation and I don't have the answers (as you can see by how much it is
costing me).
Best of luck.
Steve
|
193.638 | | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Mon Jul 11 1994 19:31 | 23 |
| This is a very strange sounding story. First, isn't there *always*
scum on top of the tank? It doesn't go into the leach field because
there's a baffle that prevents it. If the scum is so thick that it
hits the top of the tank, then maybe there aren't enough bacteria
or something to decompse it, or maybe you're putting things down
your drains that you shouldn't, I don't know.
As for putting 200 gallons of water in at a time, is that a standard
test? A leach field test isn't anything like that, and I don't think
normal usage is like that, either.
Have you tried getting some other septic company to come out and
test your tank?
The story about the leach field being overblown several years ago
does sound serious, so maybe there really is a problem and it just
wasn't apparent. But it seems to me that there are a lot of questions
that the septic inspector ought to answer.
What's the current status of this problem?
Luck,
Larry
|
193.639 | questions on septic upgrade | WMOIS::ECMO::SANTORO | Greg Santoro | Tue Jul 12 1994 10:44 | 61 |
| Since there is talk about rebuilding septic systems here I'll ask these
questions.
In applying for a building permit to convert a porch into part of our house
(a den) the board of health had to get involved because technically
making any additions to a house that already contain a kitchen, living
room, and bathroom is considered a bedroom...no matter what you plan to use
the space for. The board of health told me they "approve" the plan but I
have to upgrade my 900 gallon steel tank to a 1000 gallon concrete tank and
place a restriction on the deed that the house can only be a 3 bedroom.
I'm fairly sure I already have a 1000 gallon tank. Last year I had it
pumped before we bought the house and the septic guy measured it and
told me it was 1000. But I do not know the contruction...I think it is
metal and here in lies the problem.
Q - Is there an easy/cheap way to find out the contruction of the tank? I
called the company that did it for me last year and he said to give me an
official certificate he'd have to pump and measure again at a cost of about
$150. I suppose I could dig up my newly seeded lawn to find out if I hit
concrete but could I sink a large iron stake and tell from the sound?
Suggestions welcome.
He also said to replace the tank would cost in the area of $1200-1400.
I'll be getting other estimates but I was wondering if there
are other complications that could arise that could send and estimate a
lot higher?
Also, what perplexes me is that if I bring the system up to code (I was
told last year the leach field does have enough flow capacity for four
bedrooms) why do I have to place a restriction on the deed? The board
chairman couldn't tell me why they asked for the restriction without
reviewing my file, but in any case I do not want to place a restriction on
the deed...it could be a major hassle to have it lifted and could kill the
resale.
I really don't want to add 35% to the cost of my project that is already
overextended and have a restriction to boot. It seems my options are to
1 - hope the tank is already up to code (unlikely given it was put it in
'74) and have my file reviewed again.
2 - downgrade my project to a "3 season" porch (today it is just a summer
porch) and not add heat or open it up to the house. This way the BOH has
no say. This is not great since we really need the space inside.
3 - Pull the whole project (worst possible solution)
4 - Do what 80% of the rest of the population does, do it without a permit.
(I'd rather not do this either)
Any other suggestions for moving forward without iccuring a huge cost? My
buiding permit has been approved and I could build to completion but I
assume until I get the septic and deed restriction registered, I wouldn't
get an occupancy permit. Right now I am leaning toward doing everything up
to installing the heaters and ripping out the doorway to the porch.
Getting building inspection finalized and then figuring out sometime later
how to resolve the BOH issue.
Anyway I can fight this and get approval without actually replacing the
septic system?
Thanks in advance.
-Greg
|
193.640 | Sounds bad to me | MAY30::CULLISON | | Tue Jul 12 1994 12:20 | 35 |
| The scum on top of water in tank is normal. But if the scum rose above
outlet like described then that does instead indicate something
going amiss. Just because you did not have a problem means NOTHING! THere
is a difference between when the system is technically failed and
when actual symptons will show to the user. Depending on many
factors there is basically buffering in plumbing, area of tank
above outlet etc. that will buffer the system such that it may look
just fine to user in house, but in reality the system is near death
and really needs work. Depending on load in house etc. it may last
a long time without obvious failure especially if light load, but
that still means nothing. ANy idiot that would buy system as you
described will surely be in for a hell of a headache later. I know
because I had a system in many ways similar to yours when I sold and
it was painful. Actually in my case the septic tank looked totally
normal, but sense there was easy access to my old distribution box
they look at it and the water level was incorrect. So basically
FAIL !!! big expense on my part to sell home.
Moral.....If buying a home then just checking tank itself is not
necessarily enough, but the water test as described was reasonable.
If system was really good then it would have handle the 200 gallons
with no problem at all. Sounds like you got an inspector who
really knows his/her stuff. So if someone else is buying you should
use this person. If you are selling then hope he does not show up
if your system is marginal.
THe person that inspected ours did not run this water test, he failed
it only because he had access to rest of the field to inspect which
many times is not available. I know that my system would have failed
this test almost surely. After we fixed the field with a hugh
enlargement the system could have suck up 800 gallons in no time.
Harold, who has been there.
|
193.396 | Deck with septic system question | SNAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Fri Jul 15 1994 10:21 | 11 |
| Next month, we will be having a deck built on the back of the house.
It will be aprox. 10x14. We also have a septic tank/system in the
back yard.
Other than the obvious, like know where the tank is so you don't dig
a hole through the tank, and keep the cover accessible, are there
any other gotcha's that I need to watch out for. Judging from the
location of the drain pipe from the tank, none of the deck supports
should come near the leach field.
Thanks
|
193.397 | How near is near? | GAVEL::PCLX31::satow | gavel::satow, dtn 223-2584 | Fri Jul 15 1994 11:59 | 12 |
| > Other than the obvious, like know where the tank is so you don't dig
> a hole through the tank, and keep the cover accessible, are there
> any other gotcha's that I need to watch out for. Judging from the
> location of the drain pipe from the tank, none of the deck supports
> should come near the leach field.
Find out if there are local restrictions as to the proximity of the deck to
the leach field.
Clay
|
193.398 | 10 foot set back ? | MAY30::CULLISON | | Fri Jul 15 1994 14:29 | 20 |
| From vague memory of mine the tank and the field had to be at least
10' away from structures. Decks would normally be included. I believe
the main reason is to allow future access to field, which includes
access around it also. I believe it is pretty normal for a building
permit for any structure to have a plan showing new structure which
also identifies septic system etc. We put in a pool and it was required
to identify septic system etc.
Remember decks are structures which require building permits. There are
typically set back requirements from lot lines and other things.
Part of the building permit is the process of makng sure you do not
get in trouble or violate zoning. You do not want to create a
situation by accident that down the line you go to sell house and
find out you have a nonconforming addition, which may easily cause
nasty side effects at closing.
Better to be safe up front.
Harold
|
193.399 | ask the building inspector... | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Languages RTLs | Sun Jul 17 1994 10:09 | 12 |
| In Merrimack, NH, the building inspector told me (two years ago) that the rules
for distances away from the leach field were 6' for a foundation with a crawl
space and 30' for a full foundation. My deck supports are about 15-20' away
and they had no problem with these. Given that a crawl space foundation
needed to be only 6' away I can't see how a 4' hole would have to be any futher
away.
But as .256 mentions - decks almost always require building permits - and when
you submit the plans, they'll be sure to tell you if you can do what your
planning. If they reject the plan, well time to think up a new one!
bjm
|
193.400 | Don't tread on me | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Mon Jul 18 1994 15:47 | 10 |
|
Try your best to keep equipment (delivery trucks, bobcat loaders etc. etc.) from
driving over any part of the system; line from the house, tank, d-box, and/or
field; don't want to compact the soil or collapse any pipe.
You could steak out the perimeter of the system with surveyors tape as a
'keep out' area............................
- jw
|
193.401 | material for septic pipe? | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Aug 31 1994 20:31 | 14 |
| What materials are allowed for the pipe to the septic tank?
Are there restrictions on what can be used to exit the house?
E.g. does it have to be cast iron within 10' of the house, or
something like that? (I live in Massachusetts).
I'm getting the line to my septic tank replaced and I'd like
to know as much as I can about it before the work commences.
What I'd prefer is heavy duty plastic pipe for the whole length.
What I've got is 5' of cast iron followed by 30' of something
that looks like fiberglass -- and is incredibly fragile.
Thanks,
Larry
|
193.402 | | STRATA::JOERILEY | Legalize Freedom | Thu Sep 01 1994 02:43 | 5 |
|
I believe my septic pipes are all plastic. The house was built
about 11 years ago and I'm in Mass also.
Joe
|
193.403 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Thu Sep 01 1994 09:10 | 16 |
| > E.g. does it have to be cast iron within 10' of the house, or
I've heard that some locations may require cast iron for the
section that passes thru the house and for the first 10'. This
will vary from town to town and state to state. Best to ask the
building or health inspector what the requirement is.
12 years ago in Sterling Mass our contractor used Schedule 40 PVC
to go thru the house and then switched to Shedule 20 (lighter
weight, drain pipe type) to the tank. It was OKed by the inspector
and has worked fine all these years.
If I had to do it again I'd go with Schedule 40 PVC all the way,
minimum.
Charly
|
193.404 | We have plastic the whole way | ISLNDS::WHITMORE | | Thu Sep 01 1994 11:05 | 5 |
| I hooked up to sewer last winter and they did it with schedule 40
plastic pipe the entire way - thru the foundation wall, out to the
street, etc. I'm in Mass.
Dana
|
193.405 | | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Sep 01 1994 14:35 | 22 |
| > I've heard that some locations may require cast iron for the
> section that passes thru the house and for the first 10'.
That doesn't apply in my town -- a few years back my plumber replaced
a rotted out cast iron section in my basement with plastic.
I agree with the comment about using sched 40. If I were willing to
use the ligher duty pipe anywhere, it would be in the cellar where
nothing touches it and it's easy to fix if it does break. I certainly
don't want light duty pipe in my yard, where a truck could break it and
I'd have to dig it up again. So I'll make sure the whole thing is
sched 40.
Thanks,
Larry
PS: Yeah, I know I ought to talk to my town health agent. But for
complicated reasons, my town has no official documentation that my
septic system exists. That gives them the power to require me to
dig it all up to prove that it is there. The previous health agent
told me that they have no plans to do that, but still, it seems
prudent not to attract any more attention than is necessary. LS
|
193.406 | | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Gotta love log homes | Thu Sep 01 1994 14:47 | 10 |
| Our system originally had Sch 40 leaving the house, and passing under the front
porch. Before the front porch could be capped (concrete), Hurricane Bob hit.
The soil around the pipe was so wet, and it compacted so much, that it bent the
pipe. The plumber saw this the day before the concrete trucks came, cursed, and
got a cast iron pipe. I think this was a special case. We still have the bent
Sch 40 pipe, for the skeptics.
:-)
Elaine
|
193.407 | New Septic Codes? | XLIB::BLACK | | Thu Mar 16 1995 17:51 | 21 |
| If this question is answered somewhere else, please feel free to move
this or refer me to the answer...I just don't have time to read every
note, and most of the notes I saw covered what I know...
We are shopping for our first home, and a home that we are interested
in has septic. I am opposed to septic because I grew up with a well
and septic (too many rules about water!) But I'm trying to be open-minded.
I understand that there is a lot of "noise in the system" with
regard to septic in Massachusetts, and that there are code changes
coming down soon that will effect most of the septic in the state.
Is this true?
Can anyone give me the bottom line about what the issues are and
what a new home owner should expect or avoid with these new codes in
place? Who should I contact to get books or pamphlets on this?
Thanks,
Lois
|
193.408 | | SUBPAC::BOWNE | | Fri Mar 17 1995 10:34 | 3 |
|
See note 1601 in 12DOT2::MASSACHUSETTS.
|
193.409 | Thanks | XLIB::BLACK | | Fri Mar 17 1995 14:13 | 5 |
| Thanks for the pointer...
I'm going to get the title V book from the state house...
Lois
|
193.641 | NEW SEPTIC LAWS; QUESTIONS | ICS::BUCKLAND | | Mon Apr 03 1995 14:34 | 18 |
|
My husband and I have a house which has a septic system for
the downstairs toilet and sink. With the new laws (Chapter 5?)
for septic systems is it cheaper to just have the ejection system
installed or to go the inspection route. My husband feels that
we could get into big problems if we pay the cost of inspection
and have some problems flagged.
The system was inspected when I bought the house in 1986 and
passed. This bathroom is used infrequently.
There were some other notes addressing these new laws, but I have
been trying for an hour to locate them with no success. Can
someone please give me the note numbers.
Thanks,
MK
|
193.642 | Pointer | SHARE::STARVASKI | | Tue Apr 04 1995 11:47 | 7 |
|
A discussion on this has been going on in 12dot2::Massachusetts
Note 1601
Hit KP7 to add.
/p
|
193.475 | Clobber anyone? | LANDO::OBRIEN | Give it a TRI | Thu Apr 13 1995 16:08 | 7 |
| Has anyone tried CLOBBER? I picked it up this am at Maynard Supply and
they said that all the plumbers use it. I'm just a bit tentative about
using it on our system since it is septic.
thanks
-John
|
193.410 | | USCTR1::LAJEUNESSE | | Mon Aug 07 1995 15:03 | 24 |
| Well I don't know if I should put this under septic or under wells.
I'm such a experienced noter that I just added a key word to note 2030
I think on wells. The note (2030) has nothing to do with wells. Sorry
about that.
Has anyone heard that is it not good for your water softener backwash
into your septic system?
If you are not familar with Water Softeners they basically backwash to
mantain there water softening capabilities.
Mine is piped so it backwashes once a week into my leach field. I was
told that I should just have it backwash out into the woods or
anywhere else but not into the Septic System as there are metals, and
other byproducts that are not good for the system in the backwash
water.
Any one ever hear of this?
Thanks,
Mark
|
193.411 | | 2063::allen | Christopher Allen, DECladebug, ZKO 381-0864 | Mon Aug 07 1995 15:50 | 11 |
| Well, I just searched for "soft" in this topic and found reply .5 which asks
your same question. If you do the same, I think you'll find all you want to
know. Better yet, extract the entire topic and browse it with your favorite
text editor.
Before you actually do anything to change where your water softener backwash is
directed, you might ask your town building/health department if there are rules
that address what you want to do.
-Chris
|
193.412 | When should the tank be pumped? | STAR::ELSER | Operator, what's the number for 911? | Tue Aug 08 1995 14:32 | 13 |
|
Hi,
We just came up on a year in our new house. I've heard that you
should clean out your septic tank in the first year of use, then 3-5
years after that. Is this really necessary, could I get away with
another year without touching it?
Sorry if this has been asked, I just don't have the time to go through
all 269 replies.
Thanks,
-Dean
|
193.413 | Every two years | SUPER::GOODMAN | | Tue Aug 08 1995 16:00 | 6 |
| Do you know the last time it was pumped out?
It depends on the number of people in your house and the size of your
septic tank. Every two years for my house. I waited too long and it
started to back up into the house!
|
193.414 | | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Tue Aug 08 1995 16:08 | 9 |
| The reason for the rule of thumb is to find out how it is doing after you have
been in the house for awhile. The pumpers can tell how the sludge build up
is doing, and if things appear to be working correctly. I once had one done
where the guy wondered why I had called him, since it there wasn't much buildup.
If you want, you can uncover the tank yourself, and check it will a long pole.
Save yourself the expense of the pumping if there aren't any solids built up.
Elaine
|
193.415 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Wed Aug 09 1995 10:14 | 33 |
| > is doing, and if things appear to be working correctly.
This is the KEY, a properly functioning system!
I just had my system pumped for the first time in 12 years and
there was barely any sludge in the tank at all. There might have
been a foot or two in the bottom of the tank. This is for a 4
person house hold. I don't know what the secrect is (eat lots of
chile), but the system probably could have gone indefinately with
out pumping.
BTW... it was pumped because we had a small backup in the cellar.
Shower water was bubbling up through the washer machine drain. I
assumed that the system was full and called the septic pumper. It
turns out that we had a build up of grease/soap scum in last
couple of feet of the waste pipe where it entered the septic tank
which was slowing down the water flow.
The guy pumped the tank and then snaked the drain pipe to scrape
out the grease/soap build up.
He recommended a periodic (every month or so) dose of drain
cleaner to help disolve and keep down this grease/soap build up.
He said to dump 1/3 to 1/2 a bottle of drain cleaner down a couple
of drains late at night and run "just enough" water to get the
drain cleaner past the traps and on its way to the septic tank.
Then let this sit in the pipes over night to disolve any
grease/soap build ups that it may encounter along the way.
He also recommended not using powdered laundry soap and switching
to the liquid concentrates.
Charly
|
193.416 | A minimum of chemicals | LUDWIG::CASSIDY | Tim Cassidy, #365 | Wed Aug 09 1995 22:57 | 8 |
| > He recommended a periodic (every month or so) dose of drain
> cleaner to help disolve and keep down this grease/soap build up.
You mean, like Drano?!? That stuff is caustic. I don't
think it would be a good additive to a septic system. Call me
cynical, but maybe the pumper wants to insure more business.
Tim
|
193.417 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Thu Aug 10 1995 08:29 | 7 |
| .274
It's just lye. Although it's very strongly basic (as opposed to
acidic), it's not inherently poisonous, I don't believe. After
all, people used to make lye by soaking wood ashes. Diluted
in 1500 gallons of water in a septic tank, I can't see the amount
you'd put in a drain as being a problem.
|
193.418 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Thu Aug 10 1995 08:51 | 17 |
| > You mean, like Drano?!? That stuff is caustic. I don't
Yep, There's even one on the market that's billed as a slow drain
problem solver. I'm not sure how it differs from the regular
stuff, maybe it's slower acting so that it can be left in the
pipes all night. It is a bit thicker than usual, so maybe it finds
and sticks to the scummy areas to help disolve them more.
> Call me cynical, but maybe the pumper wants to insure more business.
Maybe, but consider that the reason he was called was a slow drain
due to a grease/soap scum build up... and he offered a preventative
maintenance routine that could prevent that problem in the future.
He actually offered two bits of advice to prevent this type of
call back!
Charly
|
193.419 | Title V problems | MSBCS::CHAFFEE | Cyndi Chaffee | Thu Aug 10 1995 12:40 | 59 |
|
Here is our situation. We put an offer on a house located
in West Boylston where there is only cesspool or spectic
systems. In the original offer to purchase their Broker
(we had no broker) put they would hand over the certification
for Title V on the day of closing which was scheduled for
August 29th.
Now the problems start. The P&S arrives from their attorney.
Our attorney (thank goodness we have one) said no way we are
not signing with the Title V business not due until closing.
So we request they hand over the certification end of July.
They would not do it. Our Attorney tells them you have to
because low and behold you CANNOT be given a mortgage on
property that has not been certified. So last friday
(August 4th) they have the system inspected and it failed. They
knew about having to do Title V from the beginning. We made our
offer 45 days ago.
As of today (20 days till closing)
1) We have not heard what they are going to do to fix the system.
(almost a week and our attorney is getting nothing from
their attorney)
2) We can make no plans to move because we don't know when.
3) We will be homeless as of September 1st because we gave
our 30 day notice. After our offer was accepted.
4) We went by the house last night and nothing has been done
no diggin etc. to show they are moving to make repairs or
replacement.
5) If we back out now which we have the right to do, we lose
Inspection 275.00 Mortgage application fee 300.00. Which
we would have to go after in small claims court.
6) Additionally we plan on adding one additional bedroom after
we move in. So we will have to wait to see if the new or
revised system will allow this. If not we start the process
over because we have to have another bedroom.
7) Purchase and Sales agreements are still not complete.
So this being our first home it has really taken the excitement
out of looking forward to owning our own home. I understand
the need because we are near the Wachusett reservoir. But, I
think the thing that ticks me off is that they knew they had
to do this and they put it off until a few weeks before we are
to close. They are not being inconvienced because they are
moving in with her parents which can happen anytime. We just
can't do anything until they decide what they are going to do.
Repairs or replacement will take time which we really don't have.
I feel bad that they have incurred this expense, but that's why
most people are having inspections before putting their house
on the market.
Not a happy almost homeowner
Cyndi
|
193.420 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Thu Aug 10 1995 13:07 | 27 |
| > 6) Additionally we plan on adding one additional bedroom after
> we move in. So we will have to wait to see if the new or
> revised system will allow this. If not we start the process
> over because we have to have another bedroom.
If this is the case, then rather than having them fix/ repair/
replace the system and then run the risk that it won't handle
another bedroom, get a ball park figure of having the system done
after you move in and adjust the offer price by this amount.
Homeowner's with this type of property should be bending over
backwards to attract and keep potential buyers.
If you really like the house in question, YOU call the shots and
see if the sellers agree to them, if not, keep looking, there's
lot's more out there.
Talk to your landlord about extending your say, they may not mind.
If you do have to get out, put your furniture in a U-Store-It
place and get your self a room at reasonable motel or stay with
family or freinds.
Don't give up hope yet! Buying your first home is a stressfull
event but well worht it!!
Charly
|
193.421 | Sue 'em | JOKUR::FALKOF | | Thu Aug 10 1995 13:10 | 2 |
| Talk to your lawyer about suing for performance to force them to meet
the terms of the P&S, which itself is a contract.
|
193.422 | $$$ is (your) power | MKOTS3::WTHOMAS | | Thu Aug 10 1995 17:31 | 31 |
| I second .278's comments on the sellers "bending over backwards".
Having bought/sold/renovated/rented(to others) MANY homes, I'd like to
point out some universal truths.
-$$$ talks. The power is yours. They are selling for a reason &
you're their solution. Don't lose sight of your power position.
-Home purchases are truly emotional. It's great & to be excited and it's
easy to be disappointed. But again, you're in the power position.
If all else fails, there's a large market of other homes that you can
fall in love with. When you're early in the homeowner cycle, you want
to minimize infrastructure repair costs (eg. septic, well, roof,
plumbing, etc.)in favor of "equity improvement costs" (eg. decorating,
kitchen/bath modernization, etc.).
-(Good)Attorneys are used to playing/winning the game of "who blinks
first". Don't appear too ready to concede on terms favorable to you.
If anything, tighten the screws on them. If they understand that this
circumstance has put you in a position to see immediate progress on
on their property - or you're TAKING YOUR $$$ and putting it on another
property because of your terminated tenancy, they're more likely to
"blink". Again, your power is your $$$ is more portable than their
property.
-Avoid lawsuits. It's easy to start one, they make you feel tough and
rightous. They also cost lots of $$$, which you can use toward another
home. 90%+ of these cases are settled before trial, when the
defendant &/or plaintiff see how ridiculously fast their legal bills
are growing. My guess is that your cost/reward ratio is not worth it.
Let us hear how you finally make out!
Bill
|
193.423 | Update on Septic problem | MSBCS::CHAFFEE | Cyndi Chaffee | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:09 | 28 |
|
Just a quick update. As of last night we are again at the
top of the rollercoaster. Their broker called us at 8:30 pm
to let us know the plans are designed they are being presented
to the Board of Health's engineer for approval. They told
us they will have a new system put in and certified by closing.
The actual day of closing is August 29th today is August 18th
is this possible to do. It seems very unlikely to me. Without
this certification we cannot complete our mortgage for closing.
Does anyone have an idea of time for installation of a system.
We talked to the landlord and have agreed to pay rent for
September so we won't be pressured to be out by the 31st of
August.
Any info
Thanks,
Cyndi
|
193.424 | | STAR::MWOLINSKI | uCoder sans Frontieres | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:22 | 12 |
|
Rep .282 Cyndi
>>>Does anyone have an idea of time for installation of a system.
Once they have the BoH's approval the installation should take less
than a week.
-mike
|
193.425 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:24 | 19 |
| > Does anyone have an idea of time for installation of a system.
The actual installation could be done in two or three days by a
competent crew. Heck, the approvals and waiting for inspections
could take longer then the actual installation.
But, Congratulations for sticking it out getting this far. Just
don't buckle under the pressure, it sounds like you're all set
with your landlord, banks and attorneys are use to this sort of
thing, so postponing the closing for a week or two shouldn't be
a problem if you need to.
Just DON'T close until the septic system is complete and
APPROVED!
Charly
|
193.426 | 3 days | MKOTS3::WTHOMAS | | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:28 | 7 |
| We had a 4 finger system (large, 4 bath cap.) done 4 years ago.
3 days, from scratching the ground to final cleanup.
2d the previous noter - no system = no closing!!
Good job! Best of luck to you.
|
193.427 | Update on New House | DECEAT::CHAFFEE | Cyndi Chaffee | Tue Aug 22 1995 11:08 | 35 |
|
Additional Update.
Well, here we are 7 days before closing. We have NOT received
confirmation from there Attorney on the information we heard
from their Broker last Thursday. My Attorney has left several
messages requesting confirmation. No response. I can't believe
their Attorney doesn't even return my Attorney's calls. We
also took another ride by the house last night and the ground
has not been broken. If the system is where they told us it
is we can't even see where they uncovered to get the inspection
done. We are really getting frustrated by the lack of communication
between their Attorney and ours.
Is this normal business?
We are starting to feel the pressure of this whole situation.
We have a moving company hired for September 1st, friends for
the remaining stuff on September 2nd followed by a much needed
cookout. I guess I just like to be organized and really don't
want the plans to change since it took so long to coordinate
everything and everyone.
Sorry for whining!
Cyndi
|
193.428 | Find out for yourself | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Tue Aug 22 1995 12:38 | 53 |
| Hi, Cyndi -
It sounds like you are going to have to do some legwork yourself.
in .282 on 8/18 you wrote:
>> the plans are designed they are being presented to the Board of Health's
>> engineer for approval. They told us they will have a new system put in and
>> certified by closing.
Do you know who the Board of Health's engineer is? Have you talked to him/her?
Since the other channels are not giving you a real-time status (your realtor,
your lawyer, the seller, the seller's lawyer), you need to find out what is
going on for yourself. Call the BoH engineer. Call the Chairman of the BoH.
Ask if there is an approved plan for the property. Ask when it was approved, or
when it is scheduled to be approved. If you can, find how the name of the firm
that will be doing the work. You may need to call them to find out if they
even have the work scheduled.
You don't have to be hysterical, you are just collecting data. Once you know
what is actually happening, call your attorney and ask what your options are.
It sounds like you should have had a clause in the P&S that they will pay you
for every day the closing is delayed (so you can pay your rent at your old
place).
Remember that they may not have approval for the new septic system. It may be
their fault due to foot dragging. But it may not be their fault, due to West
Boylston's unique position with Title V. If the sellers really want to sell it
to you, they will be using "due diligence" to get the work done by the closing
date. You will know when you make your calls around Town if they are actively
working at it. If you find no evidence of any action, you tell your lawyer
this: you are "ready, willing and able" to hold up your end of the Purchase and
Sale Agreement, but the sellers are not going to sell, and if they do not intend
to do the work required in a reasonable amount of time, you are cancelling the
Agreement, and you want all your money back.
They may not be able to actually sell you the property at this time. If you can
wait for them to finish, do so, but keep after everyone to be sure things keep
moving along.
If you cannot wait, either because of the stress, or because you don't believe
the work will actually get done, cancel the agreement. It does happen that
sellers do not realize what they have to do to complete a sale. It happened to
me once when the sellers missed crucial meetings of Town boards for site
preparation work needed to deliver clear title. We backed out, and never
learned if they sold. It happened to my step-daughter, when the seller was
foot-dragging about repairs they agreed to in the P&S required by the mortgage
company.
Oh, and you should postpone your moving plans until you have reason to believe
the scheduled closing date is real. Right now, you don't have that assurance.
Elaine
|
193.429 | This is a fine mess we've gotten into | DECEAT::CHAFFEE | Cyndi Chaffee | Tue Aug 22 1995 15:03 | 98 |
|
Do you know who the Board of Health's engineer is? Have you talked to him/her?
Since the other channels are not giving you a real-time status (your realtor,
your lawyer, the seller, the seller's lawyer), you need to find out what is
going on for yourself. Call the BoH engineer. Call the Chairman of the BoH.
Ask if there is an approved plan for the property. Ask when it was approved, or
when it is scheduled to be approved. If you can, find how the name of the firm
that will be doing the work. You may need to call them to find out if they
even have the work scheduled.
*** Don't know the actual engineer but spoke to the BOH last
Thursday evening as of that date the seller's have done
nothing. We don't have our own Broker we rode by saw the
house loved it and called the seller's broker. So I think
he will tell us what we want to hear just to keep us
interested. He gets the full commission on the deal.
You don't have to be hysterical, you are just collecting data. Once you know
what is actually happening, call your attorney and ask what your options are.
It sounds like you should have had a clause in the P&S that they will pay you
for every day the closing is delayed (so you can pay your rent at your old
place).
*** The P&S has never been completed. My Attorney has been holding
it because of all the problems we are having with the Title V
issue. This whole thing has been kinda screwed up from the
get go. So we have nothing to protect us form the costs we
may incur.
Remember that they may not have approval for the new septic system. It may be
their fault due to foot dragging. But it may not be their fault, due to West
Boylston's unique position with Title V. If the sellers really want to sell it
to you, they will be using "due diligence" to get the work done by the closing
date. You will know when you make your calls around Town if they are actively
working at it. If you find no evidence of any action, you tell your lawyer
this: you are "ready, willing and able" to hold up your end of the Purchase and
Sale Agreement, but the sellers are not going to sell, and if they do not intend
to do the work required in a reasonable amount of time, you are cancelling the
Agreement, and you want all your money back.
*** If there is no complete signed P&S does that keep us from
losing our deposit ($1000). My attorney is holding our
additional deposit check. I know we will lose inspection
and mortgage app fee. Which is not fair since we did everything
as we were told. At least I have learned a lot from this
experience. I will have a lot more to say up front if this
falls through and we find something else.
*** Well, most of it is their foot dragging. We signed the Offer
to Purchase in June. Not knowing what we were doing we
agreed to 60+ days. So they knew since June that they had
to do this to complete the purchase. Plus, the house had
been on the market for 4 months so they knew all along this
was necessary. They waited till August 4th to do the testing.
They were hoping new changes were going to get them out of having
to sink this $$$ into the ground.
They may not be able to actually sell you the property at this time. If you can
wait for them to finish, do so, but keep after everyone to be sure things keep
moving along.
*** Considering the situation I am not sure we are willing to
wait they have not been timely on anything including
responses. They are acting like their house is the only
nice house in West Boylson. It's NOT!
If you cannot wait, either because of the stress, or because you don't believe
the work will actually get done, cancel the agreement. It does happen that
sellers do not realize what they have to do to complete a sale. It happened to
me once when the sellers missed crucial meetings of Town boards for site
preparation work needed to deliver clear title. We backed out, and never
learned if they sold. It happened to my step-daughter, when the seller was
foot-dragging about repairs they agreed to in the P&S required by the mortgage
company.
*** When the Offer to Purchase was done their Broker made us
feel pressured into thinking we were getting the deal of
a lifetime so they would not make any repairs that were
a result of the home inspection. Good for us the home
inspection found nothing extreme.
Oh, and you should postpone your moving plans until you have reason to believe
the scheduled closing date is real. Right now, you don't have that assurance.
*** I have told everyone that it's on hold for now.
I have to call the moving company if they will
charge for cancellation.
*** Thanks for listening.
Cyndi
|
193.430 | House buying is never easy | 11581::BWHITE | | Tue Aug 22 1995 15:34 | 33 |
| Cyndi....hindsight is always 20/20. I wouldnt take all the blame for
this mess on yourself....in fact, I would place a good deal of it on
your attorney. I have never heard of "holding up" a P&S to the point
where you are 7 days from closing! I take it from you previous notes
that the sellers sent you a P&S but did not make the Title 5
certificate contingent on the sale. Your attorney should have simply
sent the P&S back stating that you needed to have a valid Title 5
certificate as a condition of the sale. If this was going to be a
problem with the sellers, they would balk at modifying the P&S, and the
issue would have died there. If they signed the P&S with your
conditions, then you would have a better handle on the situation
currently.
Now one thing I dont understand is where the bank's attorney is in all
this. Has a title search, plot plan, certificate of liens, etc. been
done by them. Usually the bank doesnt proceed with these without a P&S.
If they have, you are clearly in for more costs than the mortgage fee.
I would assess this situation from the standpoint of how much money and
effort you have expended to date and if you want to continue. If so,
get a P&S over to the seller with the conditions that you want and see
if they will sign it. If they will, you can probably salvage this sale
in the next month. If they dont, then probably they didnt realize what
was going to happen if the septic failed, and the costs are too high
for them to close the sale.
There is nothing wrong with driving by a house and liking it. You are
correct that the broker is working for the seller, but that's OK if you
understand that. Applying for a mortgage and getting a home inspection
seems appropriate without a signed P&S. Getting the septic inspection
certificate would have been nice before the signed P&S, but it's not
mandatory if the P&S states that it is contingent on the sale. However,
proceeding much further than this without the signed P&S is really a
leap of faith as that document is really the basis for the sale that
matters most to you, the buyer. Your attorney should have forced this
issue long before this.
|
193.431 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Tue Aug 22 1995 15:40 | 39 |
| > interested. He gets the full commission on the deal.
ONLY if the sale goes through!
Have your attorney start tighting the screws, she/he should be
doing this already. You're still in control, you call the shots.
You may have to threaten to walk away from the deal to prompt them
into action, but if this is what it takes, do it.
> *** The P&S has never been completed. My Attorney has been holding
> it because of all the problems we are having with the Title V
This sounds a little tricky and could be good or bad. You still
hold the cash and they still own a house that they have been
trying to sell for months now.
> *** If there is no complete signed P&S does that keep us from
> losing our deposit ($1000). My attorney is holding our
$1000 of your's that the seller is holding? No sale, you get it
back, ESPECIALLY where there isn't a P&S stating otherwise!
Maybe it's time for your attorney to tell the sellers that since
this deal appears to be going nowhere, your looking at other
properties and you'd like your deposit back, ASAP!
> I know we will lose inspection fee
You lose this, it's a cost of doing business.
> and mortgage app fee.
Talk to the bank, maybe you can keep the mortage offer open for a
period of time as a pre-approval type of status to be used on
another property. Since they've already qualified you as a good
credit risk, they'll just need to inspect the new property and
maybe you'll get a break on the fees next time.
Charly
|
193.432 | Stop right there | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Tue Aug 22 1995 17:33 | 38 |
| Cyndi -
Stop for a minute. You need to make an appointment with your attorney to sit
down in his/her office, and discuss this whole matter until you understand it.
It it clear now that you are in over your head, especially for a first time
purchase. It may be simpler that there is only one broker involved, but you
need someone to help you with the complex details of this purchase. Your
attorney is the only one who represents you alone in this. Confront him/her.
Ask all your questions. If you are not satisfied with the answers, find another
attorney (I can recommend one in Clinton if you need one).
Tell your lawyer that you need a P&S signed by both you and the seller. You
have no legal agreement until you do. Most banks won't let you apply for a
mortgage until the P&S is signed. Most offers are only valid with a signed P&S.
If I were a seller, I would not do any work until I had a signed P&S. This
could well be why the seller is dragging their feet.
When you sign the P&S, do not put much more down. You have already put $1000
just on the offer. I would recommend you not put any more than another $1500
down with the P&S.
>> *** Considering the situation I am not sure we are willing to
>> wait they have not been timely on anything including
>> responses. They are acting like their house is the only
>> nice house in West Boylson. It's NOT!
I'm glad to hear you say this. This is a healthy attitude to have, in case you
need to walk away from the whole deal.
As you are learning, this specific time is not a good one to be trying to buy in
a town like West Boylston. The new regulations are brutal to someone like your
seller who has a failed system. The details are not going to be sorted out for
quite some time. If you give up on this one, make the septic certification top
priority in considering future properties. Since this is your first purchase, I
recommend you consider something with town sewer, a pre-certified septic system,
or new construction.
Elaine
|
193.433 | P&S deposit | ROCK::MUELLER | | Tue Aug 22 1995 18:49 | 12 |
| I just sort of caught this topic in mid-flow, but ...
>When you sign the P&S, do not put much more down. You have already put
>$1000
>just on the offer. I would recommend you not put any more than another
>$1500
>down with the P&S.
I put down 5% with the signing of the P&S on my house. The broker/seller
asked for it and my attorney didn't say that it was unusual.
-Rob
|
193.434 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Aug 23 1995 10:05 | 11 |
| By all means (and I mean this literally: by ALL means), sit down
FACE TO FACE with your lawyer and get the straight scoop on your
rights and responsibilities. Don't stop until you understand EVERYTHING!
But for us vicarious participants, what did the offer letter say?
Was there no deadline on the approval of a P&S?
Did your lawyer let your sign an offer letter that bound you
as if it were a one-sided P&S?
Did you ask your lawyer to review the offer letter?
- tom]
|
193.435 | TitleV | EST::HOWE | Computers just give you the answers. PP | Wed Aug 23 1995 11:02 | 37 |
| I can help a little bit with the septic problems since I just recently
went through all the joy of having a new system installed.
In order to test the system all inspector has to do is find the tank
and uncover the lid. They'll stick a hose into the pipe leading to the
drain field and turn on the water. After about 10 minutes or so the
field has been doused with a lot of water. The inspector will then walk
around looking for water breaking through the serface or other
exceptionally wet areas. At one point my inspector took a metal rod and
thrust it into the ground on top of the field. If you see lots of tall
green grass in one area and the rest of the lawn is not so high and
green, this can be an indication of a leaky field. The grass just loves
all the extra water.
In my case my field was no good. We didn't see any water breaking out
of the top, but you could feel the area on top of the field getting
squishy. I also had a section of very healthy grass.
Throughout this part of the test, the only hole that was dug was to
uncover the lid. That would be hard to notice from the road.
The system can fail Title V in other ways. Being too close to water
supplies, wells and wetlands is a classic failure since these setbacks
have been increased under the new laws.
I'd second the suggestion about talking to the BOH. An inspector is
legally required to report failed systems to the BOH. You could also
talk to the inspector. They shouldn't have a problem telling you what
they found.
I also suggest to double check to see if the tank was pumped during the
inspection.
As far as not having the P&S yet, I'd definately talk to my lawyer.
Tim, a TitleV/septic system veteran....
|
193.436 | Latest News | DECEAT::CHAFFEE | Cyndi Chaffee | Thu Aug 24 1995 16:33 | 36 |
|
End of the story
The seller had the land perked yesterday afternoon and their
broker called us last night. They are going to put in the
new system, estimated cost will be around 20,000 the problem
is they are required to put in a 1500 gallon tank fine for
3 bedrooms but the house is only two bedrooms therefore they
are only required to put in a leaching field for two bedrooms.
We never knew they were different sizes.
Anyway we were planning to convert the house to three bedrooms
so with the new tank we thought (wrong again) we were all set.
We can have the leaching field made larger at our expense
(app. 3,000-5,000) we just can't swing it. So as of 10:00 this
morning we spoke to our lawyer to end this.
We were real upset last night but all in all if it was meant to
be it would be. We also realize this transaction has not
been smooth since the beginning. It's hard though because we
are packed with no where to go. We feel we have spent the
last 60+ days learning a very hard lesson.
If they had started the process after they accepted our offer
we would have had this information long ago.
Well, it's over. Thanks for all you words of support
and encouragement. We are taking off tomorrow for the
Vineyard and a much needed long weekend. Then we start again!
Cyndi
|
193.437 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Thu Aug 24 1995 18:43 | 15 |
| > new system, estimated cost will be around 20,000 the problem
> is they are required to put in a 1500 gallon tank fine for
Sounds a tad expensive, especially the part about an extra 3-5K to
expand the leach field. But you never know in this new Title V day
and age. The sellers/brokers maybe trying to get some more money
out of you on this too.
Take your vacation, let them stew for awhile and then have your
lawyer approach them and see if they're ready to make a deal now.
If not, then begin the search again as the WELL INFORMED house
buyer that you are now!
Charly
|
193.438 | | FABSIX::J_RILEY | I'm just a bug on the windshield of life. | Fri Aug 25 1995 03:10 | 5 |
| RE: -1
Charly 20K isn't that expensive, back in 89 it cost me over 15K.
Joe
|
193.439 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Fri Aug 25 1995 08:57 | 4 |
| FWIW, I think buying a house - even when everything goes well - is
one of the most stressful things one can do. You're no doubt feeling
both stressed out and disappointed, but there *are* other houses, and
you'll find one that's right for you.
|
193.440 | A possible alternative | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Mon Aug 28 1995 11:52 | 22 |
| I'm not sure about this Title V business, but I just had to have a
septic system replaced on a *duplex* in Raymond, NH, and $20k was about
4 times what I paid. We also found out that the place never had the proper
sized tank for a two family (2 bedrooms each side). Someone was asleep at
the switch, because the place was originally claimed to be a single family
in old town records, but that's another long story.
At any rate, the owner may be able to do what we did and install
another tank in series with the existing tank. This is MUCH less
expensive as the tank prices do not rise in unison with tank size. In
other words, a 1500 gal. tank is much more than twice the price of a
750 gal tank. This was considered acceptable practice by everyone
involved. The whole job took about 3 days from start to finish (minus
the hydro-seeding).
If you really like the house, I would mention this as a possible
solution. I would also mention that the price seems WAY out of whack,
but perhaps that has to do with the way the land perks and the title V
business. I'd also have them get more estimates too, if you want to
pursue this further.
Good luck......Ray
|
193.441 | | MKOTS3::WTHOMAS | | Tue Aug 29 1995 16:00 | 33 |
| Title V may be complicated, but something still sounds fishy. $20K???
Even assuming that #'s real, there's still the matter of $3-5K for a 3 brm
upgrade. Let's see here, new tank's ok for 3 brm. Heavy equipment's
on-site. Crew's on-site. Distribution box is in.
What's missing? Larger trench (1-3 hrs add'l labor, max)? PVC
(~$50-150)? Gravel/sand ($8-10/yd)? More labor to extend or lay another
finger (4-8 hrs add'l labor max.)? $3-5K for this???? IMO, incremental
should be less than $1K. Perhaps a seller's/broker's attempt to get buyer
to help subsidize their job, knowing their desire for a 3d brm?
Other noters???
Also, this job only makes the house more marketable, not more valuable.
Ya gotta have a system. It's also a sad situation for the sellers, as
they'll never get their $$$ out of the septic expense.
Cyndi, there's goodness in your experience. The lessons, some
increased wisdom, the supportive noters... AND I'd be totally surprised if
your bank didn't carry your approval toward other property. It is always
a good negotiating tool to be pre-approved as a qualified buyer capable
of a quick purchase. You may be able to negotiate a better deal on a
new home with your new experience and recover your losses. AND as has
previously been mentioned, the sellers of the current home may (probably
"WILL") come crawling back to you - once they realize that you're walking.
The realization that they have to start the selling process over (after
the conclusion of THE best time of the year for homesales), having just
spent a ton of $$$ on a septic system is not a pleasant thought.
We'll be watching for your happy conclusion.
Bill
|
193.442 | Weekly water softener backflush? | MSE1::SULLIVAN | | Wed Aug 30 1995 14:37 | 11 |
|
Someone asked it earlier but I never saw a definitive or data based
reply (assuming there is one...)
Are there any known problems with running water softener backflush through
the septic system? This is the way mine is plumbed now. I could change it
but don't want to unless there is a real good reason to do so.
Thanks,
Mark
|
193.443 | "Condensed" laundry detergents ok or is liquid still better? | UHUH::TALCOTT | | Fri Sep 15 1995 14:42 | 19 |
|
.18> RE: .13
.18>
.18> Powdered laundry detergents should be avoided because they usually
.18> contain 'fillers' which do nothing but add volume and settle to
.18> the bottom of the septic tanks. There are some powders without these
.18> fillers and require only a 1/4 cup or so per wash but they aren't
.18> very popular because the cost per pound is much higher even though
.18> the cost per wash is about the same. I don't see that there should
.18> be any problem with liquid detergents.
So the condensed powder (which is about the only powder you can get these days)
are OK for septic systems?
I asked the guy doing the septic inspection at our new place and was told
"Anything's okay as long as it's long as it's low-phosphate and biodegradable"
in a tone that didn't convince me that he knew for sure.
Trace
|
193.444 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Sep 15 1995 15:01 | 3 |
| There's no real difference as far as the septic system is concerned.
Steve
|
193.20 | Idea needed on cost... | POWDML::MINEZZI | | Fri Oct 13 1995 12:20 | 11 |
| Hi,
Any current estimates? We are looking at buying a house that has
a 500 gallon tank, but no leachfield. We need to estimate the costs
of putting a tank with a leachfield in it's place (and I'm told this
would require replacing the tank because it's not "designed" to connect
to a leach field ... ???)
Thanks,
Ron M.
|
193.21 | Can vary quite a bit, but... | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Fri Oct 13 1995 12:44 | 7 |
| Probably depends where you are. I just had a septic system
replaced this year in Raymond, NH and it cost me $5500 including a 750
gal. tank (which was put in series with the existing 750 gal. tank),
replacing the leach field with all new material, and removal of the old
material.
Ray
|
193.22 | | SCHOOL::SEGOOL | Mike Segool DTN 226-5896 | Fri Oct 13 1995 12:54 | 31 |
|
Hi Ron,
I've been going through the septic system two step for a few months
now. There is no easy answer to your question. The Title V and local
rules will determine what conditions need to be met by a new system.
Here's a few
The state now requires a 1500 gallon tank.
The tank and leachfied have proximity restrictions. I'm not sure what
they all are but an example would be that the tank must be > 50 feet
from your well and the leachfield must be > 100.
The leachfield must be 5 feet above ground water. This one's tricky.
This requires a deep hole test to determine at what depth you water
table is. They usually like you to do this in the spring, because
it's the wet season. If you water table is too high thay have to
raise the level of the leachfield leading to a possible hill in your
yard. If gravity can't take care of the flow, you need a pump. Now
it's getting expensive.
The only way to estimate the costs is to know how the system needs to be
designed, based on these restrictions. You need a cvil engineer.
BTW, I should probably have asked if you live in Massachusetts, because
if you don't the above might not be relevent. If you do, from what I
understand the seller has to pass a title V inspection to sell the
house and then I don't know why you would be asking the question.
Mike
|
193.445 | ...more septic questions... | BIRDIE::WHYNOT | Malibu Skier | Thu Oct 19 1995 10:40 | 8 |
| Could someone tell me the difference between a "regular" septic tank
and an "H-2O Loading" tank.
Also, what are the pros and cons of using 2-1000 gallon tanks in series
vs. 1-2000 gallon tank.
Thanks,
Doug Whynot
|
193.446 | Series tanks? hm.. | TEKVAX::KOPEC | we're gonna need another Timmy! | Thu Oct 19 1995 13:13 | 18 |
| from what little I know about how septic systems work, I can't see what
good series tanks would be..
The idea, I think, is that the tank eventually fills up with solids and
that's what you get pumped out; once the solids get into the tank I
can't see how you'd get them out reliable without clogging the outlet
line (clearly you couldn't use the usual vertical-tee that is normally
used).
So, the second tank would mostly have liquid in it (well, I guess it
would help keep solids out of the leach field if you didn't maintain
the system well), but the system would back up as soon as the first
tank filled so you'd have to pump as often as you would with a single
1000gal tank..
But I'm an electrical engineer..
...tom
|
193.447 | Cost is the main pro | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Oct 19 1995 13:20 | 9 |
| I'm not sure if there are any cons to using two 1000 gal. tanks vs.
one 2000 gal. tank, but a pro is the cost. The latter will cost more
than the former as the cost is not linear with the tank capacity.
Another pro is that if this is an upgrade, the 1000 gal. tank (or
some tank) will already be there. If it is usuable, then you only have
one smaller tank to buy instead of one larger one.
Ray
|
193.448 | Don't see why it wouldn't work ??? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Oct 19 1995 13:31 | 14 |
| re:305
I'm assuming that both tanks would have to get pumped. If the line
between the tanks could get clogged, then it makes sense that the line
to the leach field could also get clogged. Since this doesn't normally
happen, it stands to reason that any excess solids would make their way
into the second tank to start the solid breakdown process there.
When we had our system upgraded/replaced, we received 3 different
quotes and all 3 services recommended going with the series tanks. It
would appear, at least in NH, that this is standard practice. Aside
from the tank cost, there is less excavating involved.
Ray
|
193.643 | Septichelper 2000 product... | 11773::LAAK | | Thu Oct 19 1995 19:28 | 15 |
|
I have a pretty old cesspool at my house. I've been approached by
a company called Miller Plant Co. out of Maitland Florida. They
have a product called SepticHelper 2000. The salesperson says
it is only a bacteria(in a bag basically) which will help old
systems. They are so sure they are willing to send it free
and if you like it you pay. I forget the amount. Anyways,
has anybody heard about this and if so what are your comments/
experience with this type of system aid.
Cross posted in Real_Estate.
Thanks,
Robbi Laak
|
193.644 | | MILORD::BISHOP | Take hold of the life that is truly life | Fri Oct 20 1995 09:37 | 11 |
| someone tried this on me when we first moved in to our (then) new
house.
Septic tanks generate their own bacteria. Unless youflush paint
thinners down the toilet and kill them, you shouldn't need any more.
Even on an old system.
Get it inspected/pumped every two years - a much better use of your
money.
- Richard.
|
193.449 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Fri Oct 20 1995 10:25 | 16 |
| > happen, it stands to reason that any excess solids would make their way
> into the second tank to start the solid breakdown process there.
This defeats the whole purpose of a septic tank, the waste flows
down the pipe and into the tank. The solids should remain in the
tank where there are broken down and settle to the bottom of the
tank. The excess liquid flows out of the outflow pipe on the other
side of the tank near the top. If the solids fill the tank and go
out the outflow pipe, then you got serious problems and a grossly
undersized system.
The only purpose that I've heard of for a second tank is a
holding tank for the liquid where a leech field is not used. Both
tanks need to be pumped periodically in this case.
Charly
|
193.450 | Trying not to be too visual ;-) | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Fri Oct 20 1995 12:44 | 13 |
| re:308
There are solids which will sink immediately, and some that will
float for some time until they break down a bit. What prevents the
floating ones from just running out into the leach field with the
excess liquid ?
If there is some sort of grate to prevent this from happening, my
guess is that only the output of the second tank will have the grate.
This would allow the sinking solids to break down in the first tank,
and the floating ones to break down in the second. Make sense ???
Ray
|
193.451 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | DEC: ReClaim The Name! | Fri Oct 20 1995 12:57 | 9 |
|
Re .309:
The outflow pipe has a baffle, really just a sideways T, or -|.
In the steady state, liquid is at the level of the horizontal leg,
and flows up through the bottom of the vertical leg and out; the
floating stuff is blocked unless things back up so much that the
liquid level rises to the top of the vertical leg.
|
193.452 | Hell of a lunch time topic ;-) | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Fri Oct 20 1995 13:27 | 10 |
| re:310
So if there was just a straight pipe connecting the two tanks in
series, and only the second tank had the outflow pipe/baffle, would it
work the way I suspected ?
Granted, it probably wouldn't be as good as one large tank, but it
still seems that it would give the system additional "solids" space.
Ray
|
193.453 | | MSE1::SULLIVAN | | Fri Oct 20 1995 13:53 | 11 |
| H20 loading is a civil engineering spec for the weight that can safely
be driven over a structure. It is usually discussed when designing
bridges or culvert crossings for driveways and roads. If you are
planning on putting the tank somewhere where it will be driven over,
you should probably worry about this.
H20 loading ensures that an oil truck, moving truck, etc. won't end
up inside your tank.
Mark
|
193.454 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | DEC: ReClaim The Name! | Fri Oct 20 1995 14:09 | 21 |
|
Re .311:
(Wait a minute, let me stir my beef goulash... there.)
If a straight pipe connected both tanks, you'd have more room for
floating solids, which probably doesn't matter much. The heavier stuff
should still settle out in the first tank; if it fills up enough
to migrate to the second tank, you're setting the stage for a serious
blockage of liquid flow in the pipe between the two. I would think the
same is true to a lesser extent for the floating stuff.
I have to bet the same baffle will be in both tanks.
I would think there's at least one functional advantage of two tanks
over one, especially if both are baffled -- the second tank, getting
a gentler flow of cleaner liquid with little (if any) suspended solids,
will give those finer solids more time to settle out, providing cleaner
efluent to the leach field and reducing the long term risk of clogging
the field.
|
193.645 | 2nd that reply | GLRMAI::HICKOX | N1KTX | Fri Oct 20 1995 18:03 | 6 |
|
2nd the last reply. Pump every 2-3 years depending on size/use. You
can always throw in a box of Rid-X, yeast or equivalent. Usually good
after a party...:-)
Mark
|
193.23 | Min. size tank in NH? | AKOCOA::ROLLINS | five fuzzies | Sat Oct 21 1995 15:58 | 7 |
| Anyone know what the minimum size tank required in NH is
these days? This would be for a 2 bedroom home in
Lyndeboro.
thanks,
beth
|
193.24 | 3 bedroom might be min-spec | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | A Quinn Martin Production | Mon Oct 23 1995 06:10 | 9 |
| > Anyone know what the minimum size tank required in NH is
> these days? This would be for a 2 bedroom home in
> Lyndeboro.
I have no idea - but given what my builder was doing 5+ years ago, its going to
be sized for a three bedroom house minimum. I don't know what that translates
to in size though.
bjm
|
193.25 | | BIRDIE::WHYNOT | Malibu Skier | Tue Oct 24 1995 09:37 | 2 |
| According to my septic designer, 1500 gal & 3 br mininum...
Doug
|
193.455 | ...Still in the design phase | BIRDIE::WHYNOT | Malibu Skier | Tue Oct 24 1995 09:54 | 11 |
| Thanks for the responses...
My options were 1 1500 gal tank (based on a 3 br house) or 2-1000 gal
tanks (based on a 4 br house). I've decided to go with the 2-1000 gal
in series for a couple of reasons...
Possible expansion later and as a previous reply indicated, the
"stuff" in the second tank would be "cleaner" on it's way to the leach
field (actually a geo-flow system, which would need to be 25% bigger if
I went with a 4 br.) Also, the footprint of two tanks in series would
be better accommodating to the lot.
Doug
|
193.456 | Two Tanks Better Than One | GMCTRK::FERREIRA | | Tue Oct 24 1995 10:48 | 14 |
|
I am currently repairing our septic system. We are going to use
2-1000 gal. tanks. The designer, town inspectors, state inspector,
and tank pumper all commented favorably on a two tank system.
As I understand it in a one tank system some solids may escape
to the leaching field, having a second tank allows more time for
these solids to settle.
It has been suggested that the fist tank be pumped once every
three years and the second once every six years but both should
be checked every year.
Jim F.
|
193.26 | | AKOCOA::ROLLINS | five fuzzies | Tue Oct 24 1995 10:51 | 5 |
| thanks...that's what we were afraid of. We've been hearing
it's going to cost anywhere from $4K to $10K. Scary.
/b
|
193.27 | Some Component Costs | GMCTRK::FERREIRA | | Tue Oct 24 1995 11:35 | 26 |
|
Tanks size requirements for NH: 1000 gal 2 bedrooms
1250 " 3 "
1500 " 4 "
I am currently repairing our septic system for a 4 bedroom in
Amherst NH. Here are some of the component costs. Keep in mind
that Amherst's minimum requirements for leach field area are 33%
(for 4 bedrooms) larger than the states. My perc rate is 2 min/in.
No ledge or water 12ft down and no fill required.
$1000 - infiltrator hi capacity chambers and end plates
353 - 1000 gal (to be used in series with existing tank.)
30 - d-box
200 - pipe and fittings
550 - design plans
170 - permit fees
My neighbor is having just a new leach field installed for 2
bedrooms for 2k with similar site conditions. The contractor
hasn't shown up yet. He has been waiting all summer.
Jim F.
|
193.646 | a couple of other data points | 30439::HABER | Jeff Haber..SBS IM&T Consultant..223-5535 | Tue Oct 24 1995 18:01 | 11 |
| I'm on the board at a condo with septic systems and the guy who does
our pumping, etc., strongly suggests NOT using products like Rid-X,
etc. I honestly don't remember if he is saying that they are just not
effective or if they can actually harm the normal processes that are
supposed to make a septic system work. On the other hand, they do sell
us an expensive bacteria treatment once a year when they pump, so you
can draw your own conclusions. There are also companies around
(there's one in Acton, MA) which will sell you a system/service whereby
small amounts of bacteria are constantly added to the system.
/jeff
|
193.647 | Acton company | 11773::LAAK | | Wed Oct 25 1995 14:30 | 6 |
| Jeff,
Do you happen to know the name of the company in Acton?
Thanks,
Rob
|
193.457 | | EVMS::MORONEY | DANGER Do Not Walk on Ceiling | Wed Oct 25 1995 21:57 | 3 |
| re .304 ff regarding tanks in series:
How about in parallel?
|
193.648 | Caldwell... | PSDVAX::HABER | Jeff Haber..SBS IM&T Consultant..223-5535 | Mon Oct 30 1995 17:42 | 7 |
| Rob -
The guy's name is Caldwell... I don't recall the specifics, but there's
a cover story in last week's Beacon which mentions his name several
times. I'll try to remember to look at it.
/jeff
|
193.458 | DRAINZ | BIRDIE::ORLOWSKI | | Thu Nov 09 1995 14:30 | 20 |
|
Has anyone tried a product called DRAINZ on their clogged/semi-clogged
leachfield?? It was highly recommended by a septic system expert who
installs systems for a living. It is 100% biodegradable and also 100%
guarrented to open a totally blocked leachfield in 21 days or less.
The hardest part of it all is it says to "Limit the water use during
this 21 day period..." I'm on my 4th day,,,,,and my family (and myself)
are tired of 2 minute showers and only flushing the toilet once a day.
.....and laundry,,,,,I stuck the pipe out the window to drain on the
lawn.
It can be delivered into a sink,toilet or tub but best results are if
it is delivered directly to the distribution box.
My system is 15 years old,,,,pumped every 2 years from day 1,,,,no
garbage disposal,,white single ply paper. It's not blocked but the
service that pumped it said it's on its way out SOON....
-Steve
-Any comments?
|
193.459 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | DEC: ReClaim The Name! | Thu Nov 09 1995 14:43 | 6 |
|
.317> ...It's not blocked but the
.317> service that pumped it said it's on its way out SOON....
�How did they determine this?
|
193.460 | I use Drainz | MEMIT::BATOR | | Thu Nov 09 1995 15:08 | 2 |
| re: .-1 I use Drainz regularly. Plus Rid-X regularly.
Haven't needed to pump the septic for over 7 years.
|
193.461 | saturated field | BIRDIE::ORLOWSKI | | Fri Nov 10 1995 15:04 | 9 |
|
The person who pumped it noticed water was running back into the tank
from the leachfield which indicates saturated soil around leachbed.
This was observed from the last cover closest to the leachfield
removed.
When you say you use DRAINZ regularly,,,how often is this??
-Steve
|
193.462 | ABout every 3-4 months | MEMIT::BATOR | | Fri Nov 10 1995 16:16 | 4 |
| re: .-1
I guess I use DRAINZ approx 2-4 times per year.
-dick
|
193.463 | Grass .vs. Grease ?? | BIRDIE::ORLOWSKI | | Tue Nov 14 1995 07:19 | 14 |
| There are 2 DRAINZ products......one called CORRECTIVE for an already
existing problem and one called PREVENTIVE to use every 3-4 months. The
latter is a 2 package product,,,,,one has the RID-X look to it and the
other is a liquid.
Does anyone notice that the grass over the leachfield is green and lush
(we all know this) BUT the grass along the 45 degree slope and other
side is weedy,,sparse and sick? I've tried every year to
fertilize,lime,,loosen,,,add soil to no avail.
Does the length of this area indicate how old or how much crud is going
into the leachfield?? Mines about 50 feet.........
-Steve
|
193.464 | Where can you buy this stuff? | WMOIS::MELANSON_DOM | | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:31 | 3 |
| Where can you buy this DRAINZ and how much does it cost?
Dom
|
193.465 | How much? | BIRDIE::ORLOWSKI | | Wed Nov 15 1995 06:58 | 5 |
|
I bought mine at Home Depot. The CORRECTIVE was $39 and the PREVENTIVE
was $7............I'm certain HQ and others sell it also.
-Steve
|
193.661 | | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Tue Jan 09 1996 16:50 | 8 |
193.747 | PRODUCT CALLED "SEPTIC CARE"?? | NPSS::CIFELLI | | Wed Feb 14 1996 22:16 | 8 |
| I have product called "SEPTIC CARE", put out by DJC products of
Fairview NJ. I guess it is like RID-X or something... It comes
in a 6 year supply. This sounds like an old notes entry about another
septic treatment product.
Does anyone know about this product "SEPTIC CARE", I have 30 days to
return it if I do not want it. I just don't see how I can tell if
I like a septic treatment in 30 days???
|
193.748 | | HDLITE::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, Alpha Developer's support | Thu Feb 15 1996 11:43 | 8 |
| how much? It sounds like a tele-sales thing that I rejected a few
months ago. Wanted to send me the product, but had no literature or
anything else. Seems like it was $200-300.
(I did listen to the sales talk. Because of new rules in Mass. I
expect they have lots of interest.)
Mark
|
193.749 | thumbs-down | DZIGN::HABER | Jeff Haber..SBS IM&T Consultant..223-5535 | Fri Feb 16 1996 12:39 | 7 |
| My septic guy says that stuff like that is not only not useful, but it
may actually be detrimental. I think I may have put a note about that
in this conference some time ago. I believe that the company I seen
was called Miller-Plante.
Good luck,
/jeff
|
193.750 | | SERIES::CIAFFI | | Mon Feb 19 1996 16:53 | 24 |
|
f.y.i....take a look at http://www1.mhv.net/~dfriedman/septadds.htm
I received a call from Miller Plante a few weeks ago and decided to do a little
research. It turns out that not only is the stuff they sell (Septic Helper
2000) potentially dangerous to your septic system but it's also illegal for
any septic service outfit in Florida to use the stuff on a septic systems.
...Guess where Miller Plante is based ??? You guessed it !
Here's an excerpt from the web page....
'Florida Statute 381.0065 (13) prohibits the
advertisement, sale or use of organic chemical solvents for the purpose of
degreasing or declogging onsite sewage systems in the state.' ... " and (4)(b)
continues, "Persons who use organic chemical solvents for degreasing or
declogging onsite sewage disposal systems shall be subject to revocation of
their septage disposal service permits and shall be subject to other
applicable penalties as described in Chapter 381, or 489 Part III,F.S." These
law changes were effective in Florida march 17, 1992.
Regards,
Marco
|
193.751 | Not a chemical solvent. | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Tue Feb 20 1996 08:12 | 18 |
|
Septic Helper is all enzyme and bacteria, no organic chemical solvents
and therefore does not actually seem to fall under the statute. When I
looked into this a few months or so back the consensus on enzyme/bacteris
products was basically: "Not proven to be of any value in well managed
systems. Of minimal value to abused systems. Harmless to systems."
Just as an FYI:
The statute is also not due to the potential damage to your septic system
that can be done by organic chemical solvents, it's for the protection
of Florida's delicate aquifer. There have even been attempts to outlaw
the use of septic systems (no grandfathering) in Florida and force
collection and "treatment" of grey water... none of which has occured
due to the monumental cost of doing either.
- Mac
|
193.752 | Automatic fail for cesspools? | ASDG::SBILL | | Fri May 10 1996 10:28 | 19 |
|
My wife and I are planning to put our house on the market this spring
but we haven't had our title V inspection yet (Massachusetts). I've heard
that cesspools are an automatic failure, is this still true? We have a
regular septic tank and leechfield that services most of the house, but
we also have a seperate cesspool that takes care of the basement
washing machine, toilet and shower. The only thing that gets regular
use is the washing machine, so the cesspool is probably in fine working
order. I shut down the water to the toilet a while ago because it leaks
and I haven't been able to find a flapper that fits it. We've never
even turned on the shower. If title V automatically flunks you if you
have a cesspool, then I'll skip the inspection and save the ~$300.
We have town sewer available in the street, but don't want to spend the
money to hook up because we won't get it back on the sale of the
house.
Steve B.
|
193.753 | | PATE::JULIEN | | Mon May 13 1996 09:13 | 6 |
| RE: .752
From what I understand about title V, if town sewer is available the
house must be tied in before it can change hands..
Dave J
|
193.754 | How do you restrict what gets `flushed'? | SIPAPU::KILGORE | The UT Desert Rat living in CO | Tue May 14 1996 11:24 | 12 |
| Our home has a septic system. It is easy for us to restrict what is flushed
or sent down the drain. But how do you tell visitors without seeming crude?
Or do you just take chances? My sister's step-daughter's friend flushed a
tampon down their system and had instant problems. It never made it to the
tank but swelled up in line. We'd like to avoid that and having the wrong
stuff in the tank.
Anybody have a short poem or saying that could be made into a sign and placed
on the stool? We are hoping this would be clever, get the point across without
being lewd and crude. Any suggestions? Please keep it clean. ;-) Thanks!
Judy
|
193.755 | Never saw one, but... | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue May 14 1996 14:00 | 11 |
| I've never seen anything like that, but you could probably make
something yourself. If you're poetically challenged, you could maybe
make a small poster using advertisement cutouts of "things not to flush"
(i.e. box of tampons, cigarettes, etc.) and put the familar red circle
and slash over it in the event you feel uncomfortable with telling someone
the same thing.
The poster could be a kids project, if you have kids. It gets them
involved and serves as a helpful reminder.
Ray
|
193.756 | ex | BABAGI::BUCKLAND | | Tue May 14 1996 14:15 | 6 |
| I sold a house last year in Westboro with town sewerage for the
upstairs and a septic tank for the bathroom in cellar. It passed title
V even though the system was 30 years old. It only cost about $350 and
everything went smoothly. It appeared we were going to have problems
because the town had destroyed all the plot plans and records but that
wasn't a problem.
|
193.757 | good ol' country plumbing | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Tue May 14 1996 15:11 | 12 |
|
I once saw a bathroom sign that said
Country Plumbing
I knew exactly what it meant. And if you must get specific, why not
list what _can_ be flushed rather than what cannot. E.g., bodily
excretions and toilet paper only.
JP
|
193.758 | | 18559::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/L31 Pole HJ33 | Wed May 15 1996 10:27 | 4 |
| I've seen something like this:
"Don't put anything into this toilet
unless you have eaten it first."
|
193.759 | Is it Noon Yet? | CHIPS::LEIBRANDT | | Wed May 15 1996 12:46 | 4 |
|
re: last
Yummy....Time for lunch!!! :^)
|
193.760 | | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Wed May 15 1996 14:08 | 2 |
|
"You want me to do _what_ with this toilet paper?"
|
193.761 | Bad mod, bad mod ;-) | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed May 15 1996 14:08 | 7 |
| re:758
So when's the last time you had a meal with toilet paper in it ?
Sorry, couldn't resist ;-)
Ray
|
193.762 | Passed "conditionally" | ASDG::SBILL | | Thu May 16 1996 11:46 | 21 |
|
Update on note .752
Just had title V inspection. They don't automaticically fail all cesspools,
but it isn't easy to pass. The water level has to be at least six
inches below the inlet pipe for the cesspool to pass. Mine was only
about two, so it failed. I was really surprised at how full it was
since we hadn't used any water in the basement (which is what this
cesspool is for) in a few days. The septic tank passed "conditionally"
which means we have to have about $500 worth of work done to get it up
to snuff (new inlet baffle and distribution box). If we want to get the
whole system to pass, we need to hook the basement plumbing into the septic
tank and abandon the cesspool, this would cost at least another $500 and
could overload the 500 gal septic tank and cause the leechfield to fail.
We're probably just going to hook up to town sewer and increase the
price of the house to make up for it. If it doesn't sell, we'll just
add on.
Steve B.
|
193.763 | | DELNI::CHALMERS | | Thu May 16 1996 12:42 | 2 |
| Just out of curiousity, what is the typical cost to hook up to a town
sewer system?
|
193.764 | This is what I paid | BIRDIE::ORLOWSKI | | Thu May 16 1996 14:58 | 7 |
|
I just had TOWN SEWER connected to my house a few days ago. The town got $1500
to do nothing ($500 for 3 bedrooms),,,,,,the plumber got $400 to run the sewer,,
and the excavator got $1500 to dig (98 feet). There were other details included
like loam,,re-seeding grass,,pumping the old septic system. Southern NH.
-Steve
|
193.765 | Depends on your situation... | ASDG::SBILL | | Thu May 16 1996 16:22 | 8 |
|
I guess it depends alot on where you live and how long ago the sewer
lines were run in the street. In Shrewsbury the town collects $500 from
each customer. In Northboro it's $6000!!!
Then your water bill goes up.
Steve B.
|
193.766 | septic problems | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:14 | 4 |
| umm, you should not be having problems with flushing tampons etc.
into your septic system. A properly functioning septic system can
handle that.
|
193.767 | I've seen the results | SIPAPU::KILGORE | The UT Desert Rat living in CO | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:48 | 9 |
| RE: .766
>> umm, you should not be having problems with flushing tampons etc.
>> into your septic system. A properly functioning septic system can
>> handle that.
My sister had a problem with her system when a friend of her stepdaughter
had one not make it to the septic tank, it got flushed part way down the
line and swelled up, which plugged the line, then things backed up whenever
someone flushed more down the toilet. It was a mess.
|
193.768 | title 5 | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Mon Jul 08 1996 18:42 | 22 |
|
I have a failing leach field which I know it will not pass
"title 5" (my plumber told me).
My house's water usage level is very low so I could get by with
it for now.
But I'd like to have an idea that what exactly "title 5" is
and how much will it cost if I want to make my leach field
passes "title 5" before I could sell my house?
My plumber told me that I would need an engineer to do
the analysis and blue print work and have a plumber do
the ground work following the blue print.
I am wondering if anyone has gone through this process because
you wanted to sell the house which was not "title 5" certified.
Could you share your experience with me?
Thanks!
-Shuhua
|
193.769 | Some info. | CPEEDY::FLEURY | | Tue Jul 09 1996 08:55 | 18 |
| re: .-1
In Mass. you can not sell a house that does not comply with Title 5.
Title 5, is the collection of statutes which define the construction
and use of septic systems. If you have a "failed" system, immediate
repair is ususally required. Since you have found this on your own, I
would suggest that you perform some form of repair or maintenance which
minimizes further problems.
Since I don't know the size of your system, I can't really give you a
good estimate, but expect the total cost to be in the range of $10k -
$20k or more. One of the costs is to remove the "sanitary" sand that
is now contaminated. The longer you use the system in this state,
additional sand will be contaminated and require removal.
Good luck!!
Dan
|
193.770 | | UPSAR::WALLACE | Vince Wallace | Tue Jul 09 1996 13:00 | 13 |
| The cost to fix a system can vary widely, depending on your
location and what needs to be fixed. Is it just the leach field,
or will you also need to replace the septic tank? Is there room
for a new leach field, or will you have to put it in the same place
as the old (which would involve the expense of removing the old
material - I don't think you have to automatically have the old
field dug up). Are you far enough above ground water, or will
you have to build a mounded system?
I'd guess the cost to be in the range of 5-20 thousand.
Vince
|
193.771 | minimize futher leach bed problem | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Tue Jul 09 1996 13:00 | 18 |
| Thanks for the info. I heard that the size of the septic system is
related to the number of the bedrooms. My house is a 30+ years ranch with 3
bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. This is probably a typical size of
house. So I guess it will probably cost mid-10k?
I had my septic tank pumped last month. My plumber suggested
that I have the septic tank pumped again 1 month later. He said this
would give the leach bed a chance to repair itself. I don't know if
this makes sense. But I would probably give it a try since I am not
really ready to spend 10k to 20k yet for rodoing the leach bed.
Are there any other low cost ways of repair or maintenance for this
problem?
Thanks.
-Shuhua
|
193.772 | | UPSAR::WALLACE | Vince Wallace | Tue Jul 09 1996 13:03 | 5 |
| Be careful about having the tank pumped. A system which is
pumped 3 times in one year is automatically defined to be
failed, and pumpers are supposed to report this to the local
Board of Health. -- Vince
|
193.773 | Title 5 experience | NPSS::SEGOOL | Mike Segool DTN 226-5896 | Tue Jul 09 1996 13:04 | 37 |
| Shuhua,
Title 5 is a set of rule/regulations that specify how a septic
system must be built and function. We had a Title 5 done last
fall. You need to hire someone who is licensed to perform the
testing. It will cost several hundred dollars just to do the
testing. They will test the entire system, not just the parts
that you think are failing. You will have to fix everything that
fails.
Our system was too small to handle some renovations we are doing.
We hired a Civil engineer to come up with a set of plans. More
hundreds of dollars. We then had to go through 3 town Boards
to get approval. (Your mileage may vary on this) We still haven't
had the work done yet. Thousands of dollars.
As mentioned, -1, you have no choice but to get the Title 5 inspection
if you are selling a house. Title 5 is complicated. Our Civil
engineer told us he had trouble keeping up with it because it was
changing so often.
Mike
But I'd like to have an idea that what exactly "title 5" is
and how much will it cost if I want to make my leach field
passes "title 5" before I could sell my house?
My plumber told me that I would need an engineer to do
the analysis and blue print work and have a plumber do
the ground work following the blue print.
I am wondering if anyone has gone through this process because
you wanted to sell the house which was not "title 5" certified.
Could you share your experience with me?
|
193.774 | | CPEEDY::FLEURY | | Tue Jul 09 1996 13:05 | 16 |
| RE: .-1
I don't mean to burst your bubble, but...
If your house is 30+ years old, than the tank won't comply either. If
you can get the work qualified as a "repair" than it will be less
costly. .-2 had it right, there is a possiblity that the spare
trenches can be used. All systems were designed with spare trenches to
be used when the primaries died. The problem is ususally the lack of
"as built" drawings which show the locations of these trenches.
If the problem with the leach field is that some solids entered there,
then time will help a lot. Having the tank pumped monthly will help
here.
Dan
|
193.775 | septic complications | CPEEDY::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Tue Jul 09 1996 14:02 | 22 |
| more complications:
the system may fail because it is not performing as it should.
it may also "fail" because its too close to something else.
the list of things was expanded and the distances were reduced
in a big change to title 5 a couple years ago. since then,
some of the restrictions were relaxed a bit.
home sales have declined due to the changes in title 5.
the realtor lobby is opposed to it. contractors love it.
"tree huggers" love it. home sellers hate it.
there are lots of rules, and reasonable
people can diffent opinions about the wisdom or stupidity of
different provisions. there is a good chance that some of the
rules will change, and some chance that they will be rolled back
altogether. when? beats me.
this is a state law, voted on by reps from places with sewers and
places with septic systems. rent control was lifted by a statewide
vote, and most of the places with septic systems were on the lift it
side. like most issues, this one will not be settled on its merits,
even if we could figure out what the merits are.
|
193.776 | Have Title 5, need scanner | CPEEDY::FLEURY | | Tue Jul 09 1996 14:07 | 6 |
| I have a copy of the latest Title 5 document. Anyone have a scanner to
read it in? It a bit long to type.
Let me know.
Dan
|
193.777 | do "Title 5" only when you are selling house, right? | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Tue Jul 09 1996 14:43 | 32 |
| I had the septic tank pupmed 4 years ago, the plumber told me that
the leach bed was wearing out (pipes were plugged up so the
water was not dispersed properly). I had the septic tank pupmped out
again last month, the different plumber told me the leach bed
problem too. But during the 4 years period, I did not smell
anthing funny (well, very very once in a while) in the house.
But again, the water usage has been extremely low.
I'd like to keep the house in a sellable condition but I don't plan
to sell the house in the near future. I'd rather throw the money
into the house only if I know that I could get it back later
when I sell the house. To me it is probably not
wise to fuss around with "Title 5" business now as long as
I don't aggravate the problem, right? Besides, "Title 5" rules
could be changed. We have more relaxed inspections rules for older cars
why should not we have more relaxed rules for older houses?
I have 1 acre land. The well is in the front yard by the street and the
septic system is in the backyard. The house is right next to a small brook,
both the front yard and back yard are adjacent to the conservation lands.
So I guess I have room for the alternate leach bed.
Well, thanks so much for all the info. I am glad I asked. I learned
a lot.
-Shuhua
|
193.778 | no colored papers! | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Tue Jul 09 1996 15:01 | 26 |
| >I don't aggravate the problem, right? Besides, "Title 5" rules
>could be changed. We have more relaxed inspections rules for older cars
>why should not we have more relaxed rules for older houses?
Because in both cases, the laws are intended to reduce
'pollution', and the older sources are usually the worst. Eliminating
the older cars would cut out lots of air pollution - if you want to
verify this, try standing near an older car/truck/bus sometime - it'll
bring back memories because of the smells!
It's mostly the older, non-compliant systems that the title 5
was intended to cull out. The fact that this costs money was sort of
skimmed over...now it's being reduced, and hence more pollution will
get out. The car regulations are already gutted - if you get a serious
failure, all you have to do is show that'll it cost a certain amount
to fix, then they waiver you...
If you're not planning on selling your house soon, and don't mind
a potential health problem for you or others, then don't mess with it
until you have to. Reduce your water waste as much as possible, use only
white TP, NEVER dump greases and such down the drains, and reduce chemical
dumps as much as possible - whether detergents, cleaners, or whatever.
Regular pumping (depending on load) is standard maintenance. If your
field is clogged, it's because the solids got out there - they should never
leave the tank. When you have it pumped, you're removing the solids that
didn't break down, not the fluid - that'll go out the pipes into the field
normally.
|
193.779 | | 19096::BUSKY | | Tue Jul 09 1996 16:15 | 11 |
| > septic system is in the backyard. The house is right next to a small brook,
> both the front yard and back yard are adjacent to the conservation lands.
> So I guess I have room for the alternate leach bed.
On the contrairy, you may be too close to *ALL* of these elements
to do anything!
You best bet is to be kind to the system, review the current Title
V rules and hope and wait for some changes in the future.
Charly
|
193.780 | | 19096::BUSKY | | Tue Jul 09 1996 16:20 | 9 |
| > -< do "Title 5" only when you are selling house, right? >-
NO!, You MAY HAVE to bring the system into compliance when you
refinance the house. Or, if the system causes you major problems
and the septic pumper reports it and/or an obvious outflow from
the system is reported to your local board of health and they come
to inspect!
Charly
|
193.781 | More info. | CPEEDY::FLEURY | | Tue Jul 09 1996 16:27 | 23 |
| RE: .-a few
Before anyone gets a heart attack here understand that there are
provisions within Title 5 for "grandfathered" systems. Also, ALL
systems are built with alternate trenches that are not used by the
initial system. These are there specifically for use when the original
trenches fail. The biggest difference with the new regs are that the
tank size is much larger than years ago. As far as the trenches go,
the new Title 5 specifies much SMALLER trenches than before. Also
newer leach fields can be much smaller in area than before.
For the particular situation which started this latest string of
replies, I suspect the following will need to be done (verify with an
installer though...)
1) Remove the existing trench material (this will be necessary if the
solids have entered the sand at all.)
2) Replace the main tank with one that is sized according to new
standards. The minimun size is 1000 Gal now, I think, used to be
500 gal.
Dan
|
193.782 | should I or shouldn't I? | EVMS::MORONEY | It's alive! Alive! | Tue Jul 09 1996 16:55 | 11 |
| They will soon install a new sewer line in my street for a development up the
road. I will have the opportunity to "tap into" it. I currently have a
septic system that's about 10 years old and problem free so far.
Question: Is there any reason for me not to do so? How does the septic/sewage
issue affect the price of the same house? (I can "justify" it to myself if
the cost to hook up is less than the alleged "increased value" of the house)
This is in Mass. so the Title V stuff all applies.
-Mike
|
193.783 | | STRWRS::KOCH_P | It never hurts to ask... | Tue Jul 09 1996 19:44 | 13 |
|
Well, the are many concerns:
1. What is the hookup fee? What will the hookup fee be in X years?
2. How much will it cost to run the pipes to the street? Do you have to
cut thru the current septic field to get to the street?
3. What is the quarterly fee for the sewage? Are you required to get
city water if you get city sewage? If not, how do they measure the flow
to bill you?
etc...
|
193.784 | | EVMS::MORONEY | It's alive! Alive! | Wed Jul 10 1996 13:01 | 20 |
| This is what I found out:
Any failure of a septic system or sale of the house will require a connection
once the line is in place.
Once the sewer is installed and "approved" by the city, abutters have until
Oct 15 to either hook up or at least run a connection from the sewer to the
property line. Cost of this is whatever one can deal with a standard
contractor + $220 hookup fee.
If you do not do so the city will run a connection to the property line
and lien their cost to do so. But "their cost" is much more due to the
"prevailing wage" law, which essentially means they pay the standard union
wages in Boston (around $30/hr for a backhoe operator) rather than the local
rate. This must be paid at time of hookup or sale of the house.
I already have city water and won't have to cut through the old field to run
a line.
-Mike
|
193.785 | Pay me now, or pay me later | GLRMAI::HICKOX | N1KTX | Wed Jul 10 1996 15:46 | 17 |
|
It's too bad you have a drinking water well and are near a brook,
these are the systems they will really go after and probably will
be more costly to design/build. The Conservation Board would also
become involved due to the brook in addition to Board(s) of Health.
If you think you might want to sell, you'd probably be better having
the inspection done, repair/replace, etc... while you can spread the
expense out over a few years, otherwise you'll get hit with one
big expense just as you're moving and if it fails then, it could drag
out the sale period.
You are correct that regulations could change though. It is really
one of those "best educated guesses" that you are going to have to
make to fit your own situation.
Mark
|
193.786 | rates might go up | CPEEDY::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:23 | 14 |
| re hooking up to a sewer or not:
first find out what the charging formula is. it is typically
proportional to the water bill. that lets you estimate the
ongoing expense.
also consider the political situation and where you live.
the cleanup of boston harbor is being financed by raising the
sewer rates. some have been multiplied by ten and might go
up further. folks in some towns were surprised to discover they
were in the cleanup district. the politicians from the cleanup
district are trying to get other areas added to the district,
to share the pain.
|
193.787 | | STRWRS::KOCH_P | It never hurts to ask... | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:35 | 5 |
| re: .784
Sounds like blackmail to me...
Or what I learned in school - eminent domain?
|
193.788 | anyone familiar with Acton ? | 26115::LALIBERTE | PSG/IAE - OGO | Thu Jul 11 1996 10:25 | 14 |
| Question about sewage proposal in South Acton, MA...
My house (Liberty St) has the original septic system so I will fail Title V.
In the next couple of years, I will either be selling my home or
remodeling it, adding among other things a new bathroom. I will have
to address the septic at either time.
I have heard briefly that So Acton may get an area sewage system
sometime. Is this even close to reality or idle chatter ?
If anyone is closer to this issue, any details would be appreciated.
Joanne
|
193.789 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Jul 11 1996 10:35 | 23 |
| > <<< Note 193.785 by GLRMAI::HICKOX "N1KTX" >>>
> -< Pay me now, or pay me later >-
>
> If you think you might want to sell, you'd probably be better having
> the inspection done, repair/replace, etc... while you can spread the
> expense out over a few years, otherwise you'll get hit with one
> big expense just as you're moving and if it fails then, it could drag
> out the sale period.
I recall that Title 5 inspections need to be done within 6 months
of the sale of the house, so doing a preemptive inspection ahead of time
will tell you what you need now, but won't save you from another
inspection if you sell in a year.
On the other hand, inspecting and fixing now will bring you into
current code at today's prices. You probably have the option of
not fixing some stuff that's found bad, but probably would have to fix
some other stuff. Entites like the Board of Health have certain
authority here (as was mentioned earlier about septic pumpers
having to report too-frequent cleanouts of a given property).
Tough choices.
- tom]
|
193.790 | T5 with 3br, 2ba.... | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Thu Jul 11 1996 13:04 | 9 |
| As a previous reply mentioned, the Title 5 laws have been
undergoing changes since the big uproar after their enactment.
ANYONE involved would be wise to check on their current state; a
friend just had the inspection done, and it cost about $500, she
passed, and say's it's valid for 3 years, I think. So check the
current status...
Also note that when you're selling, the fact that you're
ALREADY T5 validated is a big, big selling point.
|
193.791 | title v - good for 2 yrs | ALFA1::SMYERS | | Thu Jul 11 1996 13:39 | 14 |
| We've just had our title v done and the rules are:
good for 2 years, unless you have documentation showing that you've
had the tanked pumped once a year and then it's good for 3 years.
Call around for prices!!!!! They really vary. We paid $323 for
the inspection AND to have a 1500 gallon tank pumped. Some places
I called wanted $350 just for the inspection.
I hate title v, it's just a way to legally extort money. There
is no way our next house will have septic (didn't have a choice in
current house, town doesn't have sewerage).
/Susan
|
193.792 | "betterment" | EVMS::MORONEY | JFK committed suicide! | Thu Jul 11 1996 14:47 | 7 |
| re .787:
> Sounds like blackmail to me...
I guess it is, but I sort of consider myself lucky in a way since it could
be much worse. My uncle just got charged nearly $20,000 for the privilege
of getting his street and yard torn up, and hookup was "mandatory".
|
193.793 | | 19096::BUSKY | | Thu Jul 11 1996 15:44 | 16 |
| >> Sounds like blackmail to me...
> of getting his street and yard torn up, and hookup was "mandatory".
What they're usually trying to do, besides getting you to hook
up, is to get all of the street construction done at once.
If they didn't, they would tear up the street to install the main
sewer line and then regrade and repave the whole street. Then
every year or so, you'd have one or two residents hooking into the
sewer line. This would require digging into and patching the
street. After awhile, it turns into a real mess with all of the
patches. By at least running the sewer stubs up to the property
line, they can then repave the whole street.
Charly
|
193.794 | | EVMS::MORONEY | JFK committed suicide! | Thu Jul 11 1996 15:56 | 11 |
| > patches. By at least running the sewer stubs up to the property
> line, they can then repave the whole street.
This is exactly the reasoning explained to me by the city engineer when I
talked with him. The city decided it would be better to at least spend money
to run the line to the line (if the homeowner didn't) than to have the street
repeatedly dug up. Also once the street (a state road) is paved the state
requires some serious $$$$ for proper repair if dug up during the next 5 years,
so that even the $30/hr backhoe operator wages are a bargain in comparison.
-Mike
|
193.795 | In MA proposed legislation to give tax credit for septic system replacements | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Thu Jul 11 1996 17:17 | 10 |
| FWIW, in case anyone hasn't read their paper today. I read in
the Nashua Telgraph today that the MA legislature is working
on some tax legislation right now, around Weld's initiative to
cut taxes.
The article also mentioned there is a proposal to give tax payers
a credit (much better than a deduction) of 40% of the cost (or
40% of $15k, whichever is smaller) of replacing a failed septic
system. You MA folks should probably call your State congress
reps ....
|
193.796 | re south acton sewers | CPEEDY::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Mon Jul 15 1996 18:34 | 16 |
|
re rumored sewers in south acton:
it is a lot more than rumors. there is a lot of activity.
there might or might not be sewers in south acton "soon".
"soon" is used in a geological sense. perhaps within 5 years.
it is covered frequently in the two town papers. there is a town committee
that meets weekly i think. call town hall for schedule.
it is covered in the town report. lots of discussion at town meeting.
there is a discussion in the news insert that came with real estate tax
bills about two weeks ago.
the advocates are confident enough that they have expanded their plans.
they want sewers in several other parts of town immediately after
south acton, and at least some of them want the whole town to have sewers.
|
193.797 | For Sale - Tank cleaner (natural enzymes material) | EPS::BOWLES | | Thu Sep 05 1996 10:09 | 22 |
|
Glenn Bowles
EPS::BOWLES
DTN 381.2031 home 603.882.9169
I just purchased a six year supply of "Septic-Helper 2000". I have a
weak system and I wanted to see if it really works. I don't want the
whole six year supply. I will sell any part of the kit for my cost
of $150 for the six year supply.
You put in 1/4 of a bag per month for 6 years except for the first two
months when you put in 1/2 of a bag per month for a 500-1000 gallon tank.
I will copy the information sent with the product for anybody who is interested.
I have read all the previous replies about this type of product so we don't
have to go through them again. I was planning on having my system pumped
next year and I will report back on its results. I also have a sink drain
that does not flow fast and this stuff is suppose to clean the pipes
as well.
Glenn Bowles
|
193.798 | Is it too late a season for Title V work? | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Tue Oct 29 1996 13:54 | 25 |
193.799 | been there, done that, spent $$$ | HYDRA::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, SPE MRO | Tue Oct 29 1996 15:53 | 10 |
193.800 | Do it now | ASABET::SOTTILE | Get on Your Bikes and Ride | Tue Oct 29 1996 16:27 | 8 |
193.801 | Get it done FIRST. You don't want surprises! | ASDG::SBILL | | Wed Oct 30 1996 10:00 | 29 |
193.802 | Advantage in doing it now | FOUNDR::DODIER | Double Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Oct 30 1996 10:17 | 6 |
193.803 | will a failed inspection report in the health dept hurt you? | WRKSYS::SHEN | | Wed Oct 30 1996 13:47 | 8 |
193.804 | Ask for "private" inspection... | ASDG::SBILL | | Thu Oct 31 1996 07:40 | 13 |
193.805 | | ASABET::SOTTILE | Get on Your Bikes and Ride | Fri Nov 01 1996 08:49 | 4 |
193.806 | Home Buyer experience | STOWOA::CHAFFEE | Cyndi Chaffee | Fri Nov 01 1996 15:19 | 84 |
193.807 | http://www.magnet.state.ma.us/ | NETCAD::COLELLA | | Fri Nov 01 1996 16:33 | 7 |
193.808 | | HYDRA::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, SPE MRO | Fri Nov 01 1996 17:31 | 13 |
193.809 | 1 vote for do Title V now | MROA::BRENNAN | | Mon Nov 04 1996 10:24 | 32
|