T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
51.1 | sniffer testing | AKOCOA::DENINE | | Thu May 23 1991 00:21 | 7 |
| I think I might be able to squeeze it in here.
It is a question about emmisions .I want to build a pro street vega
or mabe a chevette.Say I chose to use my 81 Chevette for the project
It would have a 396with hiborn fuel injection.Now with the emmision
laws being what they are . Will I be able to get it inspected. Will
it have to pass a sniffer test .this would help to decide if I should
go this root .thanks
|
51.2 | one way | CNTROL::REARWIN | the quality of mercy is not strained | Thu May 23 1991 08:57 | 7 |
|
In mass all cars 15 years old or less have to be sniffed. If you have
a relative in another state, it would probably be easiest to register
the car there. Then since you'd never drive to that state, it wouldn't
matter if you didn't have thier inspection sticker here in Mass. OF
course, I don't recommend violating any motor vehicle regulations. ;-)
Matt
|
51.3 | Worry about emissions later. | WMOIS::BOUDREAU_C | | Thu May 23 1991 17:21 | 16 |
| If you go with an 81 car, you should be able to get it to pass. In
fact, the emission to the mid '80's aren't too bad. I have a 79 sunbird
with 350 (no cat/open air cleaner/600 Holley/ect...) and it always
passes, no problem. If at worst, adjust the idle circuit.
One tip that I got from a friend, which I haven't had to use, yet.
If you're too high on emissions, run your tank down, and put 1/2 gal of
drygas in it. Then put a couple of gallons of gas. This mixture will
contain allot of alcohol, which burns very clean, and leaner than gas
by about 50% (by leaner, I mean it takes twice as much alcohol to
perform the same amount of work as gas. This is what I am told. Others
may disagree). I am told this works. Like I've said, I haven't tried
it. If all else fails, you will be able to get inspected SOME WHERE.
:*))
CB
|
51.4 | Question on Gas... | AKOCOA::MINEZZI | | Sat Aug 17 1991 10:28 | 12 |
| Hi,
I need to ask a question regarding Gas....
What is the difference between leaded and unleaded gas? Is it power?
pollution? what are the pro's and con's
What changes are there is the cars motor that runs leaded and unleaded?
Thanks,
Ron.
|
51.5 | leaded gas... | BTOVT::ROBERGE_M | | Mon Aug 19 1991 05:34 | 35 |
|
Re -.1
Ron,
Basicly, Leaded gas was used in `72 and earlier motors. Lead adds
more octaine [power], but awful pollution. The difference in engine is
that the "lesd motors" have valve train components that are made out
of a softer metal, requiring the lead to act as a friction lubricant.
Running a "lead motor" on todays gas, without lead additive in the gas,
could deterioate your motor to destruction within a few thousand miles.
So the Pro's are more octaine & proper lubricatioin for those older
high compression engines. the cons are that lead gas is not sold at gas
pumps any more, so generaly you have to carry around plenty of "lead
additive" to mix with, every time you pull up to the pump.
A lot of people with the older engines, when they have them rebuilt,
have the mechanic install newer "hardened" type valve train components,
so they can run the motor on unleaded gas, generally Super Unleaded 93
or 94 octaine.
My motor in my `71 Charger is a `74 400 big block, but the cylinder
heads are out of a `63 426 max wedge big block(soft valve components).
When I had the heads redone, I couldn't afford to upgrade yet, so I
have to always mix lead additive to my gas. I use "REAL LEAD" additive,
which is not a synthitic additive, it's the real thing. More expensive,
but it makes the gas just like it used to be in the late 60's......
Hope this helps,
Mike Roberge
|
51.6 | More on cons | SANTEE::AUGENSTEIN | | Mon Aug 19 1991 09:20 | 21 |
| Unleaded gas is *much* kinder to spark plugs and exhaust systems than
leaded gas. The only two issues are the potential deterioration of the valve
seats, and the potential for pinging, in those high compression engines
originally built to run with leaded gas. Reply 1 stated this, but it might not
have been clear because of the references to "valve train components".
So, if you have an engine originally designed for use with leaded fuels, it
will last a long time running on unleaded, *provided* you do not have a
significant problem with pinging (retard the spark somewhat if you
must), and *provided* you drive it gently. Running hard on unleaded will
cause the valve seats to deteriorate much much more quickly. I don't agree
with reply 1 regarding potential destruction within a few thousand miles,
unless the engine is pinging badly during normal driving. It's only the
valve seats, particularly the exhaust, that we're talking about here.
More octane only means more power if you *need* the octane to avoid
pinging. Otherwise, you could make a case that more octane than the engine
needs will give you potentially *less* power, because higher octane gas
burns more slowly than lower octane gas.
Bruce
|
51.7 | ouch! | BTOVT::ROBERGE_M | | Mon Aug 19 1991 10:18 | 23 |
| RE -.1
Bruce,
Thanks for your additional note, it helped clear some things up for
me, also. When I Mentioned "possibile destruction within a few
thousand miles", I was refering to engines that we're driven hard &
worst case seniro. i.e.- The engine rebuilder that did my motor warned
me about my heads, and told me about a motor he did for a kid at the
beginning of last summer(70 340 Duster [soft valve seats]). Apparently
the kid didn't know he was supposed to use lead additive. 2months after
the rebuild(&~2000miles of thrashing) the kid came back to complain
that he was having terrible engine troubble. My friend felt
responsibble and tor it down to find the problem. Well they found the
problem alright, The valves we're sunken so bad they we're almost in
the oil pan!;-)!!!! They had to throw out the heads and start over.
Very expensive for the kid that didn't know what he had. - - - and
yes!, that was only 2000 miles, but plenty of thrashing too....
Miker
|
51.8 | | TROOA::GILES | | Fri Aug 23 1991 22:51 | 4 |
| re: .5 - interesting!! What intake are you using and what did you do to
get the ports to line up?
Stan
|
51.9 | Pump it or add it? | PRIMES::UEBERSAX | Kris, GSG Primes DWT Sales Supp. | Sun Sep 01 1991 03:56 | 13 |
|
I'll be putting my '69 Barracuda back on the road soon with the
original engine configuration; 1969 383 block and heads, 10.5:1
compression.
I see two choices for fuel. Put octane and lead additives in today's
gas or make a trip to a station that has racing gas each time I get
low. The racing gas is leaded, 110 octane, and $2.40/gal.
Are the additives sufficient? They sure would be more convenient.
Don't know about cost.
Thanks, Kris
|
51.10 | REAL LEAD, or no lead | BTOVT::ROBERGE_M | | Tue Sep 03 1991 09:41 | 20 |
|
re-.1,
Kris,
The easyist way(the way I do it), is to buy "REAL LEAD 104+" lead &
octaine boost additive, by the folks who make OCTAINE BOOST 104+(1 pint
red can). The "REAL LEAD 104+" comes in a gray 1qt can and treats 20
gallons per qt. It is the real stuff(lead) with 104+ octaine boost, so
you get your lead & octaine boost in one "easy to carry in the trunk"
can. You buy the stuff at any automotive store, and it costs varys
store to store, but generally is $7-$9 a can. So, you put a can in at
the pump($9/20=$0.45/gal) and it's gonna cost you 45cents a gallon,
then mix super unleaded at ~~$1.45/gal. And what you get is $1.90/gal
leaded gas at ~99 octaine that you can fill up anywhere. You are all
set (just carry extra cans with you).........
Mike Roberge
|
51.11 | Cheap source for Real Lead | CADSYS::SHEPARD | Overwhelmed by trivialities | Wed Sep 04 1991 08:45 | 7 |
|
Summit racing equipment sells six packs of the 1qt 104+ real lead
cans for $31.50 plus shipping plus a $5 UPS hazardous materials
charge. That'll drop your cost/gallon of treated fuel by about
$0.10 or more.
--Dave
|
51.12 | | TINCUP::MFORBES | This Space Intentionally Left Blank | Fri Oct 11 1991 11:35 | 14 |
| For lack of a better place to put this...
I will be redoing the fuel system in the Vega while I have the rearend out. I
will be rerouting the fuel line, running a larger (3/8" instead of the stock
5/16") line, and installing a Carter electric fuel pump.
There is a reasonable chance that I will be running N2O once the car is running
and sorted out. I was told by a local shop that I should run a separate fuel
system and pump just to feed the nitrous system. This sounds like overkill for
a what I plan to be a relatively "mild" installation.
What do you nitrous experts think?
Mark
|
51.13 | Murphy rules with a heavy hand in nitrous land. | SANTEE::AUGENSTEIN | | Fri Oct 11 1991 15:32 | 11 |
| Do it.
Do it right.
Overkill it.
At least twice :-).
Bruce
|
51.14 | Now you see itPOOF! now you don't | TROOA::GILES | | Fri Oct 11 1991 20:36 | 8 |
| N2O needs an ample fuel supply. If the sucker ever leaned out on you,
KABOOMSKI !!!!
I've seen some systems advertised lately with a pressure sensor that
shuts down the nitrous system if fuel pressure drops below a certain
amount. This would be cheap insurance in ANY nitrous installation.
Stan
|
51.15 | Overkill wouldn't hurt though | RANGER::BONAZZOLI | | Mon Oct 14 1991 10:58 | 5 |
| From my experience with nitrous I had no problems with the
stock fuel system. This was on a 350 Chevy with a quadrajet and
a 125 horse nitrous kit.
Rich
|
51.16 | Home brewed hi-octane? | CUJO::BROWN | Dave Brown | Sat Jan 04 1992 19:30 | 8 |
|
I've heard it said that one can manufacture hi-octane fuel by
taking pump gas and mixing it with methanol. Is this true? If so, where
does one typically get methanol and what ratios of gas/methanol produce
what octane equivalents?
|
51.17 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Sat Jan 04 1992 21:04 | 10 |
| Methanol is about 99 octane, so it should raise octane in a mix. I don't
know where to get it in quantity (try a performance automotive place), but
if you just want to experiment with a tankful, I think solvent alcohol at
a paint shop is methanol, or you can buy a bunch of gasline antifreeze (get
the cheap kind, the other kind is isopropyl alcohol)
If you start using a large portion of alcohol, you may have to rejet the
carb. Methanol has a different fuel-air ratio than gasoline.
-Mike
|
51.18 | Methyl Alcohol? | KAOFS::J_CLARKE | | Mon Jan 06 1992 06:41 | 6 |
| Isn't methanol another name for methyl alcohol? If it is, it's
methyl hydrate or "wood alcohol" and available at most any drug
store or drug supplier. Used to use it to mix model airplane fuel.
Can be bought in up to 5 gallon quantities.
JC
|
51.19 | Going lean | SANTEE::AUGENSTEIN | | Mon Jan 06 1992 07:03 | 4 |
| Figure 2:1 on the jetting for alcohol (I think it's actually 2.2:1), so
a 10% alcohol content will make you around 5% lean, etc.
Bruce
|
51.20 | Ethanol...$'s but its the best! | NWTIMA::ELLISONRA | | Tue Jan 07 1992 09:26 | 9 |
| I don't think 10% is practical, less it's summertime. Cold
weather reduces the amount gasoline can absorb, but i've
ran 5% with no problem. And do remember it's corrosive,
especially to brass/copper/alum etc. Tests show running 10%
(gasahol) requires fuel system maint. every three years due
to corrosion. Amazing what it does for the soggy bottom end
on four cylinders though. Nice torque boost!
Randy
|
51.21 | sources for leaded hi-test at pump? | LEDS::CASCIO | | Thu Feb 06 1992 11:54 | 12 |
| In view of some of the conversation going on in the "Firebird" note, I
have a question which I thought should probably go here...
Some of you have mentioned buying 94 octane leaded gasoline. I've
recently put my '68 442 restoration project on the road. I've used
some of the additives mentioned here (REAL LEAD 104+, etc.) along with
super unleaded in the past, ... I was wondering where you've found that
one can buy real leaded hi-test at the gas pump these days? I live in
Southborough, MA, and work in Shrewsbury. Are there any sources around
here?
Thanks for any suggestions!
|
51.22 | | TINCUP::MFORBES | It's NOT your father's Chevy Vega | Fri Feb 07 1992 06:51 | 7 |
| re .21
Sorry, I can't be of much help to you as I live in Colorado Springs. I get the
94 octane leaded premium at the Milk Store on Austin Bluffs just East of Academy
Blvd. Dave Brown (Mr. Firebird) gets his somewhere in Denver.
Mark
|
51.23 | Asking the correct sources | CUJO::BROWN | Dave Brown | Fri Feb 07 1992 07:03 | 14 |
|
Ask at your local Speed Shop(s). That is how I found the 108 and
114 (too expensive for me to buy on a regular basis though). In my
case, the HIGH octane is only by gas can or drum. That is to say that
you bring them a gas can or 55 gal drum and they fill it; no pumps.
In the case of the 94, I called around a lot but what really worked
was calling Motorcycle Shops and individuals with motorcycles. Those
guys seem to be right on top of who pumps the higest octane.
Good Luck!
Dave
|
51.24 | | BARUBA::REARWIN | the quality of mercy is not strained | Fri Feb 07 1992 11:59 | 1 |
| Doesn't Sunoco in Westboro Center still sell CAM2 racing fuel?
|
51.25 | | IAMOK::FISHER | | Fri Feb 07 1992 13:12 | 6 |
|
Yes it does - 110 Octane leaded. $3.69 per gallon though.
Put in 4 gallons and top off with premium no-lead. Should do
the trick!
Tom
|
51.26 | good suggestions! | LEDS::CASCIO | | Mon Feb 10 1992 11:16 | 5 |
| Thanks for the pointers...!
As a start, I'll roll on over to W'boro and check that out!
Marc
|
51.27 | | RANGER::BONAZZOLI | | Tue Feb 11 1992 10:01 | 5 |
| A couple of years ago, there was a Sunoco on RT. 9 near the
Southboro/Framinham border that had high octane gas. I don't remeber
if it was leaded or not, but it might still be available there.
Rich
|
51.28 | sources | LEDS::CASCIO | | Wed Feb 12 1992 14:28 | 5 |
| There is one across from Bay State Lincoln/Mercury on Rte. 9, I'm not
sure if that's the one you mean, but I'll check it out.
I did swing by the one in W'boro, and, FYI, they're (now) charging
$3.98/gal for that 112 octane leaded racing fuel!
|
51.29 | Leaded vs. Unleaded Gas | TRNING::FRANCO | Spin, crash and burn! | Tue Mar 31 1992 10:32 | 11 |
|
I was wondering if we should start, if not already in another note,
a topic around gas, i.e. unleaded and leaded.
I have a '67 Pontiac GTO that I put unleaded 92 octane in with an
additive for lead. I can't find any leaded gas anywhere and I
doubt that it is still available.
What do others do?
Rich
|
51.30 | | NUMERO::C_WILLIAMS | Hammer | Tue Mar 31 1992 10:54 | 21 |
|
Even though Colorado has smog problems (especially Denver), we can
still find leaded gas. I can get it at the local Kwik Way. It's
octane rating is 87 though so I only use it in my Landcruiser. For
the Firebird, I use what-ever Premium unleaded I'm near and use a
lead additive. I can't remember the name of the additive, it seems
to be okay, I just picked it up at the local K-mart. I have a 20cc
plastic syringe I BORROWED from work, with about a six-inch 3/8-inch
tubing pressed on it so I can squirt the stuff down into the tank.
With the tank fill tube being in the rear-center of the car, I can't
use the dinky reservoir that the additive bottle has -- I end up
dribbling additive all over and never getting any in the tank! The
syringe works great.
I recently threw out poundage of old musclecar magazines. I took
the time to go through them before tossing and, if I remember
correctly, managed to save a couple that had big articles on leaded
vs. unleaded and how to properly convert to unleaded. I'll scope
it out and let you know what they say.
Hammer.
|
51.31 | | TINCUP::MFORBES | It's NOT your father's Chevy Vega | Tue Mar 31 1992 11:16 | 5 |
| I thought that I put it in here before, but the rest of you Colorado Springs
folks, the Milk Store on Austin Bluffs sells 94 octane leaded premium. It's
what I run in the Vega. Last I bought some, it was $1.499.
Mark
|
51.32 | Valve seat recession | MVDS02::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Tue Mar 31 1992 15:21 | 27 |
| The absence of lead in gasoline effects the valve seats, especially when
the motors are run at high speeds and/or for long periods of time. The
seats recede into the head because there isn't a cushion of lead to protect
them.
Replacing the seats with hardened seats will suffice. Most pre-'72 motors
used the cast iron of the cylinder head as a valve seat. Subsequent
production utilizes press-in seats instead.
Press-in seats CAN loosen and fall out while this is an impossibility in a
pre'72 head that doesn't have separate valve seats.
the seats are installed by chilling the seat to shrink it and warming the
head to expand the hole that's been machined into the seat area. The
chilled seat is then pressed in and when the head/seat assembly is at a
constant temperature, theoretically, the seat won't come out.
Take it from someone who has replaced a couple of pistons, this isn't
always the case. Both seats that caused the damage, BTW, were factory
seats, not after-market pieces installed at a machine shop.
As for lead additives/substitutes, they come in two flavors. One is as an
octane booster (which usually doesn't do squat for improving valve seat
life) while the other is designed to increase valve seat life but doesn't
do all that much to raise the octane level.
skip
|
51.33 | | EEMELI::JMANNINEN | IKnowIt'sTrue'causeISawItOnVT | Wed Apr 01 1992 00:36 | 4 |
| I have a solution for you: move to Finland;
we still have leaded 99-octane in *every* gas station here.
- Jyri -
|
51.34 | Valves, valves and more valves | TRNING::FRANCO | Spin, crash and burn! | Wed Apr 01 1992 08:29 | 17 |
|
I have read the same info. that Skip mentioned in .3 about the valve
seats. I am currently having a short block rebuild done to my
GTO engine due to a worn main bearing. In the process the heads
have been sent to a machine shop because two of the valves were
bad. (Seating problems.) I can only conclude that this happended
due to NOT using a lead additive all of the time. (I would only
put the additive in once in two or three tank fulls.) I only put
in the lead additive NOT the octane boost because the unleaded I
buy is 92 octane which should be plenty. ( I am willing to listen
to someone else's opinion on this.)
If you can find any more info. I'd be interested in reading it.
Thanks,
Rich
|
51.35 | how many miles | JURAN::HAWKE | | Wed Apr 01 1992 10:57 | 6 |
| re -.1
Just curious how many miles on the GTO engine with bad
valve seats ??
Dean
|
51.36 | 170K miles and rebuilt | TRNING::FRANCO | Spin, crash and burn! | Mon Apr 13 1992 12:11 | 12 |
|
In response to .35, the engine has over 170K on it. I have had
it for the past 50K miles. Prior to that I'm sure the engine was
worked on because you can see where gaskets have been replaced,
i.e. the splash plate below the intake manifold.
In my case the 4 exhaust valves on the right side were pretty well
worn.
Hope this helps.
Rich
|
51.37 | source in MA | LEDS::CASCIO | | Wed Apr 15 1992 14:01 | 13 |
| In response to the question a little while back as to where to get
leaded hi-test, I had asked the same question a few months ago. I'm
in Southborough, MA, and someone pointed me to the Sunoco in
Westborough center. They do have 112 octane leaded fuel, ... for
$3.95/gal!
I put about 3/4 of a tank (balance super unleaded) in my '68 442 to see
how it'd run, and I was quite pleased! However, I'm gonna either mix a
smaller amount or try some of the additives that are available.
That's the only place around here that I've found...
Marc
|
51.38 | | IAMOK::FISHER | | Tue Oct 20 1992 07:18 | 6 |
|
There's an independant gas station near the Mall of NH in
Manchester that sells CAM2. It's next to Pizzeria Uno and
the Sears Homelife store. Not sure of the price or octane though.
Tom
|
51.39 | | CNTROL::REARWIN | be kind to animals | Wed Apr 06 1994 10:57 | 12 |
| >was running with 3 1/2
>month old
>gas.
Prompted by Bruce's racing account I started to wonder.
Is age itself a problem with gasoline?
Is exposure to the atmosphere a problem, enabling the gasoline to out-gas?
Would a modern car, with an unvented fuel system, out-gas, and would the
fuel stay better longer?
Matt
|
51.40 | | SANTEE::AUGENSTEIN | | Wed Apr 06 1994 11:02 | 7 |
| I have read that gasoline loses octane points with age, and that the fuel
companies make their gas to an actual higher rating than advertised, so that
when it's sold at the pumps it meets the advertised rating.
My reading it doesn't make it true, of course, but I have no other info to go on.
Bruce
|
51.41 | What about the season? | SANTEE::AUGENSTEIN | | Thu Apr 07 1994 07:59 | 13 |
| I've read that, in many parts of the country, winter gas is now actually a blend
of gasoline and methyl or ethyl alcohol (i.e. - gasohol), or it's some other
version of a so-called "oxygenated" fuel. This is apparently required by the EPA
in many urban/suburban areas to reduce air pollution during those cold months
where atmospheric inversions, etc. add to the smog problem.
I've also read that these blends reduce peak power.
Does anybody have the straight scoop on any of this?
Thanks.
Bruce
|
51.42 | | TINCUP::MFORBES | It's NOT your father's Chevy Vega | Thu Apr 07 1994 08:11 | 17 |
| Bruce,
Tis true! Thanks to the all knowing Colorado legislature, we get to use
oxygenated fuels here in Colorado during the winter. There have even been
some rumors that they want to expand the program to year around.
They use the two alcolols that you mentioned and also use MTBE. The upside
is that it probably reduces emissions on ono-computer controlled vehicles.
My assumption is that on a vehicle with an electronic feedback fuel management
system, the ecu, based on input from the oxygen sensor, detects the lean
condition created by the oxygenate and reajusts the mixture to compensate. It
seems to me to have no benefit on these vehicles.
I find in my vehicles that I loose a noticible amount of power and approximately
1.5 mpg during "garbage gas" season, as I call it.
Mark
|
51.43 | Gas is for Racin', Alcohol is for drinkin' | NWTIMA::BERRYDO | When the green flag drops... | Fri Apr 15 1994 17:49 | 17 |
|
I will second Mark's statememts about power and mileage loss. I have
both types of cars, new F.I. and old ('68 Camaro) and the "Garbage Gas"
takes a noticable toll.
The '89 2.8L MFI Beretta looses about 2 MPG and runs noticeably
rougher. Power output is not greatly affected.
The '68 refuses to run with a "normal" tune-up. I have to add about 8
degrees more timing, run super unleaded and hook the valve to the carb
intake heater up to full vacuume, to get max heat. Only then will the
car be driveable.
I understand that they add 10% alcohol.
Don
|
51.44 | Same here | IAMOK::FISHER | | Mon May 09 1994 12:16 | 8 |
|
Ditto here, the wife's `91 Isuzu 4x4 (3.1 v-6) drops to an average of
18 MPG in the winter with oxygenated fuels. Come spring, summer it's
back to 22-23 MPG.
Same trend with my `79 Malibu.
Tom
|
51.45 | Methanol questions | CXCAD::FRASER | | Fri Sep 23 1994 08:49 | 11 |
| Hi,
Next year when I go racing (drag) I was toying with the idea of running on
alcohol. The carburetor conversion is cheep and easy. The biggest reason though
is horse power. It's supposed to be a significant hp gain without a large cash
drain... Also watching "NHRA Today" they said Methanol driven vehicles are less
affected by weather. That's a nice plus...
Anyone out there have any experience running on alcohol ??? Tips or
drawbacks ???
Brian...
|
51.46 | gas is for washin' parts, alchohol isfor drinkin', nitro is for racin'! | NWTIMA::BERRYDO | When the green flag drops... | Fri Sep 23 1994 12:32 | 18 |
|
I would not call the convertion to alchohol "cheap and easy". Because
it takes about twice as much volume of alchohol to produce the same
mixture as gasoline you must upgrade your fuel delivery system to
handle it. That means twice the fuel pumps, twice the fuel line size,
twice the fuel capacity in the carb bowls etc... In addition, alchohol
is corrosive so maintenance is much more involved. You will have to
drain and flush the fuel system after every race. The alchohol itself
must be kept in a tightly closed container because it will absorb water
from the air in a hurry.
I have a friend on a TAD team and they spend a significant amount of
time just dealing with the issues listed above.
my $.02
Don Berry
|
51.47 | Relative terms | CXCAD::FRASER | | Fri Sep 23 1994 13:16 | 16 |
| Well "cheep and easy" in this case is relative. In my situation it is both.
I have no fuel pumps,regulators and other parts of that sort.... My tank will
hold about a quart, is gravity fed and I probably will burn less than a pint
at a time.
I didn't know about the hydroscopic problem. That's good to know...
How corosive is methanol ?. Will it eat the aluminum in the carbuators if left
in the bowls ? What do you flush the system with, or could you just drain the
tank and run out the carbs ?
I plan on asking lots of questions this week end up in Denver of people
who run alcohol, but asked the question here also because there is a lot of
expertise in this file... The more you ask , the more you learn, and in this
case knowlege really is power... (-:
Thanks,,,
Brian...
|
51.48 | still sellin' good stuff? | RAVEL::SENDLOSKY | | Tue Apr 22 1997 15:47 | 6 |
| Is the Sunoco station on Rt 9 in Southboro
still selling the Cam2(?) gas?
thanks
larry
|
51.49 | 100 at the pump | FABSIX::J_BALDINO | | Thu Apr 24 1997 01:11 | 11 |
|
Larry, I just read in the May '97 issue of Hot Rod magazine that 13
lucky service stations in CT,MA,DE,NJ,& PA will carry the new
"SUNOCO GT",100 octane race fuel at the pump. It's a trial
program with possibilities of going nation wide.
HRM quotes the price at $2.99 per gallon.
I'd be intrested to see if Southboro is one of them,it would be
only a few miles from home for me and just what my 12.5:1,
750 dblpmp,Clevland is thirsty for!
_john
|
51.50 | what do you use now? | TALLIS::SENDLOSKY | | Thu Apr 24 1997 08:18 | 2 |
| John, what do you use now for fuel?
|
51.51 | ULTRA 94 | FABSIX::J_BALDINO | | Fri Apr 25 1997 04:13 | 7 |
|
Right now I'm just using Sunoco Ultra 94, but it still does some
pinging going up steep grades. I'm gonna have to start to experimenting
with some 104+ or try to find some CAM2.
_john
|
51.52 | Next question | TALLIS::SENDLOSKY | | Fri Apr 25 1997 08:07 | 30 |
| John,
I haven't seen 104+ in auto stores near me (Leominster).
Where do you get it? I've tried Outlaw Pro.
Also, since you said you live near Southboro and
are going to look for CAM2, I'm deducing that the
Sunoco on Rt 9 no longer carries the "racing" gas. True?
And, while doing some browsing last night, I found a
web page that had some Sunoco CAM2 gas info. They make
Sunoco "Standard" (purple, 111 octane), Sunoco "Supreme" (blue, 112 octane),
Sunoco "Maximal" (red, 117 octane), and Sunoco "GT unleaded" (natural, 100
octane).
There is also references for using Toulene, Xylene, and MTBE (methyl-
tertiary-butly-ether). They're common ingredients in octane boosters in a can
and the cost is 2.75-3.50 per gallon. Mixing them 30% with 92 octane gas yields
from 98.6-99.8 octane depending on which ingredient used.
I can see it now. Pull up to the pump, whip out your 5 gallon container of
Toulene, put it in the tank. Then the 16 oz bottle of lead substitute. Then
pump in 15 gallons of Ultra.... I hope somebody nearby starts selling Sunoco GT.
One more thing, I've seen a adverstisment for somebody selling
TEL (tetra-ethyl-lead). Real lead additive for octane boost. This guy
must have a stockpile of it cause it can't be manufactured anymore.
larry
|
51.53 | high octane | FABSIX::J_KASPER | | Fri Apr 25 1997 08:11 | 2 |
| I remember seeing cam2 in westboro center at the gas station across
from the radiator shop.
|
51.54 | | DANGER::HARTWELL | | Wed Apr 30 1997 07:59 | 9 |
| Yep, still there. My buddy just pumped $37 bucks worth into his GTX.
ME I cheaped out on the Ultra 94 in my GTX as I had my fun with this
stuff at the end of last year. Boy does the old 440 keep pulling
past the century mark with that stuff.....
/Dave
|