T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1610.1 | I agree | SNAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Fri Jun 24 1994 11:02 | 39 |
| Noise is a legit concern and has cost MANY clubs the use of their
fields. More and more clubs are adopting noise limits for their
members. The CMRCM club instituted a 100DB limit this year. I believe
the Loopers club is also 100DB.
Unfortunately, it's not always the noise LEVEL that is the problem, but
rather the PERCIEVED noise level. There are many 4 stroke motors that
are above 100db but they just have a more "acceptable" sound. 2 strokes
are notorious for having "unacceptable" sound even though they may
actually be quieter on a noise meter.
Enya 2 stroke motors are EXTREAMLY loud and come with a flow thru stock
muffler. OS mufflers come with a baffle installed which helps with the
noise. 049's without mufflers HAVE to be the most annoying.
I agree manufacture's should be more responsible but until the modeling
community DEMANDS better mufflers, they won't do anything. If everyone
went on strike for ONE season and did not buy any new motors and wrote
letters to the manufacturer's saying "I would have bought a new motor
this year, but your mufflers are too loud so I didn't", you'd see some
fast changes.
The makers of effective after market mufflers also need to be more
responsible by REASONABLY pricing their product rather than taking
advantage of engine manufacturers "don't care" attitude and club
noise limits and price gouging. Davis Deisel makes excellent aftermarket
mufflers but it'll be a cold day in h*ll before I spend $50 bucks for
a 40 size muffler. Depending on the motor, that approaches HALF the
cost of the motor.
The other thing your run into is clubs that have wide open fields with
nobody near by. Noise just isn't a concern so passing a noise limit
would be next to impossible. I suspect this is what you were seeing
although the motors mentioned are notoriously loud.
It "is" a problem and hopefully the engine manufacturers will take the
hint (and responsibility) and start selling motors with effective
mufflers. Even if all they did was make an effective muffler OPTIONAL
at an additional cost.
|
1610.2 | | UNYEM::BLUMJ | | Fri Jun 24 1994 12:10 | 28 |
| Steve,
I agree with most of what you said. A couple of places where
I see differences of opinion are:
1) I think it is a given that non R/C participants will find the
noise objectionable. I am going one step further suggesting that
club members at the field also find excessive noise levels
unacceptable.
2) When quieter engines begin selling well, other manufacturers will
be forced to follow. In other words, I believe the consumers
needs ultimately dictate what the manufacturers produce. Waiting
for the manufacturers is not expedient to dealing with the noise
problem.
3) My club is in the "wide open spaces", but as suggested in the first
point, I would think the members themselves would enjoy more
reasonable noise levels.
4) A $50 muffler that works is a much better value than a $10 muffler
that doesn't. If Davis is overcharging I think we just found a
potential business where some money can made!
*I read and correspond with a number of Europeans, I think they have
taken the noise issue a lot more seriously than we have. It is my
understanding that they have developed(often home brew) muffler
systems that work very well.
|
1610.3 | | WRKSYS::REITH | Jim WRKSYS::Reith MLO1-2/c37 223-2021 | Fri Jun 24 1994 12:20 | 15 |
| One of the problems twith the market is that it is currently price driven. A
cheap muffler is now tossed in the box where none was provided in the 70s. The
noise issues are also a case where prop selection can really make a difference.
A simple exhause diverter will help with the .40 2 strokes. Again it is a case
where the technology is available but the lazy way is usually taken and doesn't
meet the current standards. The OS baffles make a difference but the cheap
mufflers look the exact same from the outside so the knock-offs don't bother. I
own two Davis mufflers and find that they really help limit the engine noise.
You then have to limit the airframe and prop noise which becomes the major
factor. Not too many first time .40/trainer people will bother going beyond "I
bought a kit and an engine and a radio, teach me to fly"
The $50 Davis solution is better than trying to find a field that still allows
loud engines.
|
1610.4 | | UNYEM::BLUMJ | | Fri Jun 24 1994 12:36 | 27 |
| Re -1
Most of the beginners who join my club come up and hang around the
field or know someone in the club. They usually buy for a first
plane what is recommended by their contact into the club or from
opinions solicited from hanging around.
I would like to hear this as a possible inquiry to a beginners
request for what equipment to start with:
"Well we have had good luck with the (insert trainer plane name) and
the (insert engine name and size). However, since our club enforces
a 94 db noise limit, you will also have to buy aftermarket muffler
(insert manufacturers name) or modify the stock muffler by doing the
following."
So this may read - "WE like the Great Planes PT40 with an O.S. 40
2 stroke motor and a Davis muffler to meet our noise code."
If you add up the price tag to get into R/C from scratch the additional
cost of an aftermarket muffler is not likely to deter any serious
potential participant.
The problem is the experienced flyers put up with the noise and the
newcomers follow suite.
Let's change this picture and save our fields, hearing, and sanity!
|
1610.5 | We must be eternally vigilant | MKOTS3::MARRONE | | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:02 | 23 |
| I have been on a "less noise kick" at my club for the past three years.
I took db measurements of every plane that was flying and published a
list for all to see. Then we passed a self-enforced club rule of 97db
max. One guy stopped flying his 104db ear-killer rather than modify
it. Many experimented with some kind of noise reduction, but the net
of all the work has been very little long term effect.
I am determined to keep on the trail of noise reduction, but I have to
admit, after many tests on my own planes with home-made and aftermarket
mufflers, I have not been very happy with the results. It just isn't
that easy to quiet an engine. True, pay $50 or more and you can do it,
but some models with tight cowl situations can't use these without
major surgury to the plane. Its always a compromise.
And if $50 seems like a lot to pay for a muffler, think of the price of
a quiet tuned pipe system like the one Dan Weier has on his Stryke.
The low level of noise from this setup is incredible, but how many
people can afford to buy such a setup for every engine they own.
This is not a simple problem. But it does demand constant attention
from all of us, and slowly over time we will make it better.
-Joe
|
1610.6 | LLFC clarification. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:04 | 12 |
| The LLFC has a dual noise limit system. It recognises the lower irritation
level of a 4-c and limits the 2-c's below 1.20 to 96db and all others
to 98db, big gas engines included.
Regards,
E.
|
1610.7 | Noise | LEDS::WATT | | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:23 | 20 |
| If it were my field, I would strictly enforce a 93dB limit. I don't
buy the "mufflers cost too much" arguement but there are not many good
after-market mufflers out there. Even the Davis has a VERY POOR
mounting method using a strap around the engine. They can come loose
and if you use a soft mount (also a noise reducer) the muffler will
surely come loose. We need good mufflers designed for our individual
engines. You can make good ones if you are good at welding aluminum,
but most of us can't. My pattern ships are quiet and powerful. My
sport planes are loud and wimpy.
There are PLENTY of RC'ers that do not care about noise. We have
planes that voilate our 100 dB limit and their owners would fly them
anyway unless they are told not to. (they probably fly them when they
can get away with it)
If you go to a Pattern contest, you can hold a normal conversation
while there are two or three planes in the air at full throttle. Most
are in the 90-92 dB range on the ground and this is quiet - especially
for a 4-stroke.
Charlie
|
1610.8 | Too late?... | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:49 | 17 |
| Have come from the land of lost flying sites in 1982 I was stunned by
the noise levels allowed in the USA. Since then I have campaigned for
better mufflers and noise limits in every club. With the exception of a
very few enlightened clubmates I have found abject apathy to the subject.
Lately things have improved but I am still amazed that people have to
be told "It's too loud!".
Let me tell you, it gets real quiet once the club loses a site.!
If the manufacturers strapped this problem on it would be so easy for
them to achieve the noise levels needed. Some British and European
companies are now doing this but it will take Japan to change before it
will get better.
E.
|
1610.9 | | UNYEM::BLUMJ | | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:50 | 12 |
| Re: Noise and innovation
I am always amazed by the homebuilt/designed innovations I see at nearly
all R/C clubs I have visited. Obviously a lot of thought and effort
goes into these gadgets. It's time some of that thought and energy
went into noise reduction.
There have been so many articles in every magazine about quiet
muffler designs, it certainly is one of the best covered topics.
I really haven't heard one good excuse yet.
|
1610.10 | Is loud still cool | UNYEM::BLUMJ | | Fri Jun 24 1994 15:04 | 27 |
| I have a question that I would like people to seriously answer, as it
is not being asked rhetorically.
When I was a kid a bunch of us had mini-bikes - you know with 3-5 hp
horizontal shaft lawnmower engines. These all came with the standard
lawnmower muffler. Soon it became fashionable to remove the muffler
and just screw in a piece of straight pipe. These mini-bikes made a
hell of a lot more noise than before and we thought that they sounded
cool.
Later on in high school the "motorheads"(guys who spent most of their
time tinkering with cars and souping them up etc.) always had special
exhaust systems on their cars which were very loud. I remember talk
about how cool these cars sounded among these guys.
Many of the guys who I have met in R/C clubs are very interested and
knowledgeable about engines, indeed it is the most interesting aspect
of the hobby for them. Often they have considerable background in
car engines, go-karts, motorcycles, etc.
Is it possible that what I and most non R/C'ers consider to be a loud
and obnoxious sound is actually "music" to the motor lovers ear? I
mean the sound of the Grand Prix cars at Watkins Glen is certainly
earsplitting as are the dragsters at the local strip.
To all engine lovers - Is a loud motor considered cool like on the
mimi-bikes when we were kids?
|
1610.11 | Music to my ears | KAY::FISHER | BXB2-2/G08 DTN 293-5695 | Fri Jun 24 1994 17:16 | 38 |
| > Is it possible that what I and most non R/C'ers consider to be a loud
> and obnoxious sound is actually "music" to the motor lovers ear? I
> mean the sound of the Grand Prix cars at Watkins Glen is certainly
> earsplitting as are the dragsters at the local strip.
>
> To all engine lovers - Is a loud motor considered cool like on the
> mimi-bikes when we were kids?
I like my engines loud.
I like to hear it when I fly.
In fact I get real uncomfortable during competition or fun flys when
I am up in the air and there is so much activity around me and/or in
the pits that I can no longer hear my engine.
Cool is not the word I would use.
I also like the 4 strokes puckata puckata puck sound.
I have no desire to exceed any clubs DB limit.
It's too bad neighbors get so upset over noise.
I blame it on the .049's and Enya's more than anything.
I would like to see the AMA lean on the manufactures
and force a reasonable noise lever on all shipped engines.
Kinda like a required gold sticker on transmitters.
I don't want them silent or even as quiet as you see at
the pattern competitions. I would just like them to come
down to reasonable levels. Lower for two strokes than four.
Bye --+--
Kay R. Fisher |
---------------O---------------
################################################################################
|
1610.12 | Yes, it can be done | MKOTS3::MARRONE | | Fri Jun 24 1994 18:36 | 29 |
| Last year at Rhinebeck a guy was flying a precision scale Albatros
something, you know, the one with the round planked fuse. It was
absolutely georgeous and he flew it to perfection. But the real
showstopper for me was how quiet it was. At full power it sounded like
a powerful electric. In fact when I saw it fly that's what I thought
it was. When I went over to talk to him after a flight, I asked him
what the engine was. I think it was a big Supertiger, maybe 2500 or
3000 (Jeff do you remember?). That blew me away, because they are
rather loud engines.
At any rate, the explanation for the quiet performance was his custom
muffler and exhaust manifold system. You'd have to see it to believe
it. Dual cannisters one behind the firewall, one further back in the
fuse. A pipe coming out of the second cannister then fed a dual
manifold system exiting out both sides of the fuse just like the full
scale did. ABsolutely beautiflu AND functional at the same time.
Full power had to be about 85 db or less.
Unfortunately, it took him many months of work to get it right and cost
him a lot of money and time. There are only a handful of pilots in the
world capable of doing this kind of work..
Yes, it can be done, and there are few excuses. OK everybody, start up
your welders and build dual cannister muffler systems custom fitted
with exhause manifolds. Piece of cake!!
-Joe
|
1610.13 | Less rpm - less noise - Kinda obvious.... | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Sun Jun 26 1994 11:04 | 22 |
| The main reason that the pattern folks have been able to reduce their
noise levels is lower RPM.
The lower the rpm the lower the exhaust and carb note frequency.
The lower the prop speed the lower the prop noise.
To still have pulling power at rpms between 8 and 9.5K they went to
more exotic propsizes such as 12x13 for the 2-c's and 14x14 for 4-c's.
Bigger engines tend to run well at lower rpm anyway so they can be
silenced heavily with cans etc. and use larger props. Small engines
usually suffer if over muffled. Irvine engines have designed their
stroke and porting to be quiet in the first place. The YS and OS61 have
long stroke set ups that can accept a muffled pipe. The ST2000's plus
can be heavily muffled.
The answer is to buy the quiet stuff and force the manufatures of the
other stuff to follow the quiet path.
E.
|
1610.14 | Bring up the will: 82dB!! | MINNY::MUELLERA | | Sun Jun 26 1994 16:10 | 7 |
| As I read the 100dB in one of the previous notes and all that talk of
possibilities is it is it not! In Switzerland everything is small.
Exeption the noise-meter. Every club has to own one and aknoledge the
use of a plane on their field. With an emission of max. 82 dB!!! And
it's possible. From the smallest plane over helicopters thru to
impellers. It's all a question of bringing up the will to do it.
|
1610.15 | Distance measured. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Mon Jun 27 1994 10:10 | 3 |
| Is this 82db at 3 metres?.
E.
|
1610.16 | Let's just do it! | UNYEM::BLUMJ | | Mon Jun 27 1994 12:24 | 22 |
| re: 1610.14
My friend Robin Lehman's description of power planes in Switzerland
exactly matches the description in 1610.14. Each year he goes to
the IGG aerotow meet and his reports of low noise on the tow planes
is unbelievable.
These tow planes are typically 90" - 100" wingspan with weight
in the 20 - 30 lb. range. They are powered by large gasoline
engines(G62 and larger). These planes tow up gliders that weigh
as much as 50 lbs!
The mufflers are fabricated from butane fuel cans. Robin claims
they are inaudible at 200 yds and quieter that his O.S. 300.
Eric mentioned that Irvine has actually made low noise an engineering
priority. This is the approach that needs to be taken.
We can achieve reasonable noise level with excellent performance if
we put our minds to it. It is already being done in many other
countries.
|
1610.17 | | UNYEM::BLUMJ | | Tue Jun 28 1994 09:55 | 29 |
| I received the new Model Aviation magazine last night and read a
pertinent letter to the editor.
Somebody wrote in admonishing Jim Haught for not suggesting electric
power to potential modelers, siting noise as the primary reason for
choosing electric.
Jim Haught's reply was something along the lines of "I've been around
screaming engines all my life, and it just wouldn't seem right not
to hear that noise."
When the editor of the AMA magazine shows so little concern for noise
control, I think we see the roots of the apathy surrounding this issue.
The "old-timers" in modeling got started when noise control wasn't
the issue it is today. Their failure to change with the times
exemplified by Jim Haught's remark continues to set a bad precedent
for the new people coming into the hobby.
Although Kay was the only one who responded to my question about the
appealing nature of engine noise, I believe that many long time engine
afficianados have indeed become "desensitized" to the noise, having
spent so much time around it. I have experienced this phenomena with
people who live near airports, railroads, busy roads, etc., after a
period of time the residents no longer "hear" the sounds like a
newcomer to the neighborhood would(ie the have become desensitized).
I truly believe that long time IC modelers no longer have the ability
to discern what is unacceptably loud.
|
1610.18 | A "sensitive" guy :) | WMOIS::WEIER | Keep those wings spinning! | Tue Jun 28 1994 13:20 | 29 |
|
I have been finding I am getting MORE sensitized to the noise the
longer I fly.
When I first ran the YS.61/pipe in the Stryke it seemed really quiet,
now that I have grown accustomed to it, it seems loud. People at the
field are constantly commenting on how quiet it is, but it doesn't seem
that way to me ( except at idle when it is extremely quiet) until I
hear someone start up an Enya .45! WOW, it quickly brings reality back
in regards to how loud these planes can be!
My Shuttle was very quiet with the stock Hirobo muffler, but once
I switched to a "tuned pipe" type muffler, it got louder. This has
constantly been a minor level of annoyance to me, and I am considering
going back to a stock set up.
Ironically, the Stryke and Shuttle are probably two of the quietest
aircraft at our field, but are still too loud as far as I am concerned.
In my opinion, the nicest sounding engine at the field is a .40
Surpass a flyer has installed in an Ace 4-40. The low frequency
"putt - putt" is like music to my ears. The most obnoxious have to be
the Enya 2 strokes and the unmuffled .049's. I have always avocated that
the noise criteria should take into account BOTH DB level and frequency. It
sounds like the Lazy Loopers club took both into account, and have
a nice system.
Until we start getting into the low 80's DB range, I think noise will
continue to be a problem to our hobby.
|
1610.19 | Should be an interesting reaction at my club's meeting Friday night. | STOHUB::JETRGR::EATON | Dan Eaton St.Louis,MO,USA, 445-6522 | Tue Jun 28 1994 16:19 | 13 |
| An interesting and timely discussion. Noise levels were brought
up by our club president at the last meeting. There's been some building going
on in the area around our field and the idea is to make sure we're not a problem
before we get a complaint.
One of the members who works in a calibration lab is suppose to be taking
measurements this month and reporting at our meeting Friday night. It should be
a long meeting. The current level that a plane must meet to fly at our field
is 110db at a standard distance. When asked why we had such a rediculously
high level one of the members that was on the committee that wrote the rules
said that at the time it was written smaller engines like the G-38 could barely
meet the AMA suggested level and the large engines were way above. They stuck
the noise level at 110DB so everyone would pass.
|
1610.20 | The bells, the bells.... | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Tue Jun 28 1994 16:50 | 3 |
| The only real noise the Shuttle makes is a ringing sound!, just like a
CASH REGISTER....................:-)
|
1610.21 | Another "noise" opportunity :) | WMOIS::WEIER | Keep those wings spinning! | Wed Jun 29 1994 09:22 | 10 |
|
Eric,
Get with the new technology! Cash registers don't make noise
anymore, the only sound is the in-line printer printing out a reciept!
( I have a stack of receipts several inches high :(
If I have a few more Shuttle crashes, Bob will be able to afford to
get one of the newer "silent" printers, and totally remove noise from
the process! :)
|
1610.22 | the sound of silence... | GALVIA::ECULLEN | It will never fly, Wright ! | Wed Jun 29 1994 09:29 | 20 |
| re. -1 Sounds about right. Nice one 8-).
I can echo what has been said in previous notes in that when I rubber
mounted my OS91 4-putter everyone commented on how quiet it was, to the
extent that they were asking was it a 60 sized engine. And now I feel
it is loud, again I think it is the fact that I have got used to it.
And again as said before when some of the smaller 2 strokes get going
the noise is something else.
I feel that some of the lookalike manufacturers are putting out the
copies with little regard for the noise and the silencer design. Pity
cause it will come back and bit them.
I am glad to see a trend in my club towards 4-strokes and rubber
mounted engines. Silencing comes at a price whether it be rubber
mounts, or add on silencers, or props in the APC price range.
My 2 cents worth.
Alt-E.
|
1610.23 | in before me... | GALVIA::ECULLEN | It will never fly, Wright ! | Wed Jun 29 1994 09:35 | 6 |
| Since Mr Weier got in before me 8-) my comment below was on my namesake
across the pond, welll err, big pond.
>> re. -1 Sounds about right. Nice one 8-).
Eric.
|
1610.24 | Aftermarket mufflers? | UNYEM::BLUMJ | | Fri Jul 29 1994 16:09 | 15 |
| After banging the "quiet drum" rather loudly, I am researching the
muffler choices for the large two stroke engines I am considering
for my glider tug.
It appears that only the O.S. 1.08 comes with a muffler. The Moki,
Super Tigre, and Webra engines do not come with muffler and I do
not know if the manufacturers mufflers are effective.
It appears that most commercial tuned pipes are for .61 size engines.
Where can I find mufflers or pipes for large motors?
Thanks,
Jim
|
1610.25 | Muffler Sources | LEDS::WATT | | Tue Aug 02 1994 08:36 | 7 |
| Macks Mufflers makes tuned pipes for large engines.
J-Tec makes good quiet mufflers for large 2-strokes. I have a good one
of these on my G-38.
Charlie
|
1610.26 | My 2 cents... | SALEM::DEAN | | Fri Aug 05 1994 13:20 | 9 |
|
Just thought you might want to know. Someone showed up at our field
with a beautiful new 1/4 scale cub using a OS 1.08. He had a J-TEC muff
on it. He has been grounded due to excess noise levels. Our club has a
90db rule. His engine was so load you couldn't here yourself think.
Just a thought.
Dennis
|
1610.27 | We have work to do | WMOIS::WEIER | Keep those wings spinning! | Fri Aug 05 1994 14:32 | 13 |
|
The Central Mass club is considering getting down to a 90 db limit
within 2 years. We are currently at 100db ( why even have a limit if
its this high :), are planning to get to 95 db next year, and 90 the
year after ( as I understand it ).
My current YS.61 pattern plane ( the one several people have
commented they can't believe how quiet it is ), is probably running
about 90 db. From the sound of some of the engines I have heard, we
will have our work cut out for us getting everyone to 90 dbs.
On the other hand, if we don't succeed, we will probably have our
work cut out looking for a new field.
|
1610.28 | It's a Start | LEDS::WATT | | Fri Aug 05 1994 17:21 | 7 |
| Believe it or not, we have had to tell people not to fly because they
were over 100 dB. A stinger with a G-62 was 106. It's a big problem
when all of the manufacturers sell engines with very poor mufflers on
them. (or none at all)
Charlie
|
1610.29 | When your looking for peace and quiet..... | MR3MI1::JCAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh MRO3-3/N20 297-4590 | Wed Oct 12 1994 15:44 | 20 |
|
This past weekend my brother and his wife went up to Sabago Maine for rest
and relaxation. They had the idea of sitting by the lake and maybe taking
a lazy cruise on the water in a canoe.
What they got was annoyed! Apparently there was an r/c float fly-in taking
place. They said the sound of the planes just about drove them out of their
minds. They were very thankful that their last day there was windy and
prevented the planes from flying.
Now, they know that I'm really into the r/c stuff and are actually quite
fascinated by it. So they at least have a basic understanding of what's going
on and why. But it still just about drove them out of their minds!
Just something to think about.......
Jim
|
1610.30 | >zing< | RANGER::REITH | | Wed Oct 12 1994 15:57 | 2 |
| Well, they've never witnessed "noisy" planes around you... The L-4 is
real quiet!
|
1610.31 | Hit me while I'm not looking huh!?!?!?! :^) | MR3MI1::JCAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh MRO3-3/N20 297-4590 | Thu Oct 13 1994 09:43 | 3 |
|
That one hurt Jim! :^)
|
1610.32 | | RANGER::REITH | | Thu Oct 13 1994 10:11 | 5 |
| There is one way to fix this problem...
Finish it and FLY!
(you can always re-kit it later 8^)
|
1610.33 | | MR3MI1::JCAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh MRO3-3/N20 297-4590 | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:09 | 2 |
|
The quicker way would be to SELL IT!!! :^)
|
1610.34 | | RANGER::REITH | | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:10 | 1 |
| I fear the plane has soaked up too much Balsa-Slo (tm) at your place.
|