T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1538.1 | Direct drive ==> More reliable? | QUIVER::WALTER | | Wed Jun 23 1993 18:05 | 5 |
| >>> Why don't they gear down the engine to get the
>>> rpm.
I wonder how long the gears would last at 25,000 rpm?
|
1538.2 | This and this | KBOMFG::KNOERLE | | Thu Jun 24 1993 03:59 | 24 |
| Gears are heavy, expensive and consume quiet some power. There are
gears available, but the other way round. They put it on a ZG38 and get
the revs down to 2700 rpm. They drive props with 32 inches in diameter!
This setup is by far the closest to reality (soundwise) that I've ever
seen.
To the other subject, I've looked into the possibility to convert these
chainsaw or whatever engines to airplane ones. The following problems I
encountered :
1) The carburettor in most applications won't allow inwerted operation
2) The housing is larger with additional baffles for mounting the
airblower for cooling. Needs to be cut away.
3) The exhaust often is on the wrong side
4) You need something to mount the prop.
All in all too much effort. In US you get the ZG23 to a very reasonable
price. Especially modified for airplane use. Why would one want go
through all this hassle and trashing other equipment to get the plain
engine ?
Bernd
|
1538.3 | Can be Done | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Jun 24 1993 09:45 | 16 |
| I think that it should be possible to modify a weedeater engine for
airplane use if you have access to the parts for athe prop shaft and
engine mount. Many weedeaters have the exact same carb that comes with
the G-23/G-38. As you say, the G38 has no thrust bearings. I've seen
complete weedeaters for around $100 which is half what you pay for a
G38 with no muffler. We are paying too much for Zenoah engines but
it's because it's a specialty business compared to chain saws and weed
eaters.
I've seen belt drives that I like much better than gears. As Bernd
said they are used to gear DOWN the prop RPM to swing bigger props. I
doubt that you could build a gearbox that would work in a ducted fan
application for very long! You also could not afford the weight and
power lost in the gear train.
Charlie
|
1538.4 | More trouble than it's worth!. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Thu Jun 24 1993 11:16 | 13 |
| There a lot of hidden issues with using an unmodified cahin saw engine.
Not least of which is the internal balance.
I have seen people try and mofify weed whacker engines and the eventually
just give up and do what they should have done in the first place,
purchase a commercially available aero version.
It might be fun to play with one but if you want to have smooth reliable
performance buy one that is designed for the job.
Regards,
Eric H.
|
1538.5 | Penny wise.... | ANGLIN::BEATTY | | Thu Jun 24 1993 11:29 | 20 |
| A couple of weeks ago I went to an antique engine show here in Cedar
Rapids. There were all kinds of very old internal combustion engines
running everything from small corn shuckers to washing machines. Most
of these engines were of the flywheel and single cylinder design where
some real interesting mechanics have the piston firing once every two
or three seconds.
At the same show there was a fellow with about 20 modified chain saw
engines for use on R/C airplanes. He had done some machine work to
make mounting a prop simple and had some home made mufflers. I looked
at them and a few of them had the same walbro diaphram carb that is on
my Zenoah G38.
The question is, once you have built a quarter scale plane and have
nearly a grand invested in it, would you risk that in order to save a
hundred bucks on the engine??? If you stuff a quarter scale plane it
makes a bigger dent in the ground (or whatever else it may hit) than
a sport R/C plane.
Will
|
1538.6 | I Disagree | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Jun 24 1993 14:13 | 10 |
| I disagree. The Zehoah engines are not modified except for a prop
adapter shaft and a firewall mount. They are industrial engines. If
you have a good prop shaft adapter that has minimum runout and is
strong enough to do the job then what risk is there? I spent the extra
$$ for the Zenoah mostly because I did not want to bother with doing
the mods but I believe that it could be done reliably. These engines
are not that complicated.
Charlie
|
1538.7 | Special machinery required ? | KBOMFG::KNOERLE | | Fri Jun 25 1993 09:34 | 9 |
| Some Engines I've seen do have extra walls and stuff at the housing so
that you need to do some grinding or whatever. Without having special
equipment it will be real difficult. At least true for some German
brand chainsaw engines. I think to remember also true for some American
made (or sold) ones.
Bernd
|
1538.8 | A puzzler?. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Tue Jul 06 1993 17:23 | 42 |
| I have a mystery substance that shows up in my filters in my YS
engines. I have found it in my YS-45, 61 and 120.
It is a semi-fiberous material that completely blocks the fuel filter
to the engine. It will not blow out with a pressure line and can only be
removed by soaking the filter element in Acetone for about an hour.
The other parameters are that the fuel I use is Red MAX 2-c, 10 or 15%,
1/2 castor. I also exclusively use Mobil-1 as my after-run oil.
I have been finding it for over two years now and I address the problem
by changing filters every two or three months or whenever the engine
gets hard to start.
The YS's send crankcase pressure directly to the tank so any gunge from
the crankcase can and will reach the tank. Then possibly the filter. All
YS's cycle the fuel through the crankcase in 2-c fashion.
I double filter all my fuel. In the fuel bottle pick-up and the filler
line.
I suspect that the after-run oil is acting with the Mobil-1 or that
vegetable or grass fibers are getting in via the carb. Fortunately the
YS pressure system can cope with a partially blocked filter. I now watch
for any bad starting. This is when the pressure in the tank is initially
low. I also watch for any unreasonable needle setting changes.
Some of the guys were not using filters, last year, and experienced gungy
needle valve assemblies that often caused the engine not too start.
This was/is the same problem, I think?!.
I have not found this gunge in the crankcase pressurised systems of my
OS25, 32, 46, 4-c 91 or my ST 90. The OS Hanno has a fuel pull pump so I
do not expect it to happen, but I will be watching. So far it is only the
YS's that are doing it. I was unable to blow through the YS120's
filter on the Dalotel last night. I wonder if a lot of the running
problems I experienced in the past were attributable this filter-gunge
problem?.
Any theories out there?.
E.
|
1538.9 | Mystery | LEDS::WATT | | Wed Jul 07 1993 14:39 | 8 |
| Sounds like the old "sugar in the gas tank" trick.
I had the same stuff in my YS45 check valve. (No filter used) I had
to clean it out a couple of times when the engine had troube making
tank pressure. I don't know what the stuff is.
Charlie
|
1538.10 | Needs a better name than gunge!. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Wed Jul 07 1993 15:52 | 2 |
| I shall call it "Wyesterone" untill it is identified scientifically!
:-)
|
1538.11 | | GAUSS::REITH | Jim 3D::Reith MLO1-2/c37 223-2021 | Wed Jul 07 1993 15:55 | 2 |
| I'll bet the engine just sucked in some Balsa-Slo one of the times Jim C.
pitted for you guys 8^)
|
1538.12 | I just keep changing the formula.... | RCFLYR::CAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh SHR1-3/R20 237-2252 | Thu Jul 08 1993 09:58 | 21 |
|
>>I'll bet the engine just sucked in some Balsa-Slo one of the times Jim C.
>>pitted for you guys 8^)
Actually it's my other formula....Glo-Slo-YS. I'm currently working on a
Glo-Slo-OS that works on OS engines. It's fairly safe stuff in that it only
eats away at the inside of the engine and eventually turns it into a useless
hunk of junk.
Don't let Eric know, but I just successfully tested yet another invention
called Electro-fast! It sucks all the power out of NiCds! :^)
Jim
P.S. Anyone else in the Marlboro area happen to notice a thunderstorm or
six last night??? :^)
|
1538.13 | Snap-off carb screws? (competitor of Snap-on? 8^) | GAUSS::REITH | Jim 3D::Reith MLO1-2/c37 223-2021 | Thu Jul 08 1993 10:07 | 8 |
| Right as I was dropping stuff off at UPS (just got in the door with the
boxes) one came through. Impressive!
I heard there was an underpass on Rt20 with 3' of water under it. (I headed
back up Rt140 to 290)
I see you've been working on Magnum carbs as well!
|
1538.14 | | WMOIS::WEIER | Wings are just a place to hang Ailerons | Thu Jul 08 1993 10:21 | 10 |
|
Eric,
If you run ALL your YS engines the same way that you ran the YS-45 in
your Gremrocket, the substance is probably molten piston metal that
found its way back to the filter! :)
Finally waking up...........
DW2
|
1538.15 | Update. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Fri Jul 09 1993 11:36 | 19 |
| I must correct a previous entry. The only stuff that dissolves the
Whyesterone is K&B thinners. Acetone just makes it become like gum. I
used K&B thinners last night because the Acetone had not worked over
night. The K&B worked its magic in minutes.
The blockage that whyesterone creates is 100% efective. Nothing can get
through. The filter on the pressure line to the tank, however, was clear.
(I had fitted an extra one as an experiment once whyesterone started
showing up).
Once dissolved the whyesterone leaves the filter gauze as good as new.
This stuff occurs with metal or plastic filter elements.
Still looking for answers.
Regards,
E.
|
1538.16 | maybe | KBOMFG::KNOERLE | | Mon Jul 12 1993 08:50 | 8 |
|
Not too long ago I bought real nitro thinner that costs a fortune. When
washing the brush there was this strange white something that could be
squeezed like a sponge. Could it be that someone mixed nitro thinner
instead of nitromethan ? Nah, nobody would do that ! (Have you
cleaned your engines with something ? Or oil-incompatibilities ?
Just a thought
|
1538.17 | Just a thought... | SALEM::DEAN | | Wed Aug 04 1993 14:54 | 13 |
| I was having problems last night with my OS. After getting home and
taking it apart I noticed how gunked up the inside of the head was.
Gave it a good cleaning will try it again to night. This is the first
time I have had a problem with gunk. I use to use Rem-oil (gun oil with
teflon) as an after oil. The stuff works great but is kind of
expensive. I switched over to trany fluid after reading about it in MA
a couple of months ago. Since than the gunk problem started. I was
going to use Mobil 1 but someone at the field said its risky with these
engines because at high temperatures mobil 1 brakes down leaving a
different kind of compound. Point is that I was wondering if the
interaction of the fuel with the after oils like Mobil 1 or trany fluid
at high temperature may be causing Eric's problem and my gunk problem.
|
1538.18 | Be carefull with Tansmission fluid. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Wed Aug 04 1993 15:44 | 4 |
| The other side is that Mobil-1 has prevented any damage to the silicone
parts as well as keeping the bearings shiny.
E x E.
|
1538.19 | ? | SALEM::DEAN | | Thu Aug 05 1993 09:04 | 1 |
| Does trany fluid affect non-metal parts?
|
1538.20 | Mobil-1 Works Well for Me | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Aug 05 1993 09:14 | 24 |
| Eric's problem is in the fuel system. How would after run oil get in
there???? His fuel filter was gunked up. I have been using Mobil-1
for over two years with no problems. It does not kill glow plugs (some
oils do), it doesn't attack silocone fuel tubing, and the engine
doesn't kick back like a mother the first time you start it. I used to
use Marvel Mystery Oil and it had two problems. It kicked like a
mother the first time you started it and the oil would destroy silocone
fuel tubing in a heartbeat. I've seen no evidence that Mobil-1 gunks
up engines either. I have hundreds of flights on my OS25, OS32,
OS91Surpass, YS45. I liberally apply Mobil-1 after every flying
session and the only engine I've torn down was the OS91Surpass. There
was carbon buildup around the valve seats and the valve stem but no
other indications of wear or bearing rust. I'm a Happy Camper with
Mobil-1.
Transmission fluid is a good after-run for engines with no silocone
parts but it will attack fuel tubing and the silicone parts in pumped
engines. It CANNOT be used in YS engines without destroying the fuel
regulator diaphram. You could probably get away with using it in OS
pumped engines because it is unlikely for the oil to get into the pump.
I'd still recommend Mobil-1 after our HTA experience with it.
Charlie
|
1538.21 | I can get in the fuel system. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Thu Aug 05 1993 10:52 | 12 |
| The tank on a YS is pressurised directly from the crankcase. After-run
compounds can easily reach the tank and then the carb.
In my case I put a filter in the pressure line and the fuel line. The
mystery is that the pressure line filter stays clear and only the fuel
line filter gets blocked.
Something is being filtered that is either in the raw fuel or is
combining with it.
EVL-2
|
1538.22 | You're Right! | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Aug 05 1993 13:23 | 6 |
| Good point! That goes for the OS pumpers also. In that case, don't
use petrol based oils in OS pumped engines either. Maybe the gunk is
something from the castor oil.
C.
|