T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
58.1 | | BEING::WEISS | | Thu Feb 06 1986 11:25 | 47 |
| This is one of those subjects that everyone you talk to gives you a different
story. I have heard two reasons why pounding is better than rotary drilling:
1) A rotary drill makes a 6" clean hole. A pounder cracks up the surrounding
rock as it makes the hole. That means that you could miss a water seam by
inches with the rotary drill and get no water from it, whereas with the
pounder you would break into that seam.
2) With a rotary drill, the cuttings are flushed out of the hole by water
pumped down the center of the drill at 500+ psi. If you hit a small water
seam, it can be sealed closed by the stone dust at high pressure. I'm
not totally clear on how the pounder gets the cuttings out of the hole, but
it is not under such high pressure.
The main advantage of a drill is that it is fast. You can drill a couple of
hundred feet a day, but you can only pound about 30 feet in a day. This makes
it much more profitable to run a rotary drill, even though they are more $$$.
If you are the driller, you can drill a well in 2 days instead of 2 weeks,
which means that you can drill 5+ times the number of wells in the same amount
of time. Given that they cost about the same, you make much more money that
way. Contractors also like them because they are just going to pass the cost
along to the buyers, and it quicker and more convenient.
Then there is also the question of dowsers. If you can find an old time dowser,
it would probably be well worth the $50 or so that they usually charge to
locate your well for you. Considering that drilling costs about $7-8/foot, they
only have to save you 7 feet to pay for their service, which is not much of a
gamble. There also is a firm, Accurate Water Location Service of New England,
which has a sensitive magnetometer that they claim can locate water. They
charge about $300, but we were not totally convinced that it worked.
When we were considering a well, we went and asked a contractor in town how he
went about digging a well. His response: "Well, I call up Gary Armstrong,
(a rotary driller in Windham. Probably the most reputable, since the contrac-
tor we talked to was George Dinsmore, who only builds top quality houses.),
and then I go down to the liquor store and buy a bottle of vodka and a bottle
of champagne. I pick a convenient spot, and have Gary drill there. If we hit
water shallow, I open the Champagne. If it's deep, I open the vodka."
Good luck. If your neighbors have 600ft wells, it's likely that yours won't
be shallow, although you can never tell.
BTW, we lucked out. The ledge is deep on our land, and we wound up digging
a 19 ft deep dug well.
Paul
|
58.2 | | CLT::BROOMHEAD | | Thu Feb 06 1986 18:17 | 9 |
|
The people that I have talked to have also recommended pounder rigs. (Actually,
one person I talked to insisted that it should be a *cable* pounder rig; he
implied that there is some other type of pounder rig, but I don't know anything
about that.) I believe that there is someone in Wilton, NH who uses a
cable pounder rig. I was warned that there is about a six month waiting
list for the service.
Kirk
|
58.3 | | VAXRT::WELLCOME | | Fri Feb 07 1986 10:20 | 23 |
| I had a well drilled (rotary drill) a couple of years ago. They
went 240', got 6+ gallons/minute, and had it done in one day.
From what I understand, that's pretty much an "average" well
in my area. I wasn't particularly worried about not hitting
water, and I didn't think the well would need to be exceptionally
deep.
Now, in your case, with two neighbors down around 600' with very
limited water flow, that's another story. You obviously need all
the edge you can get.
Will a pounding drill *REALLY* make a difference though? I have
my doubts, but who knows. The arguments certainly sound reasonable,
but the effects of pounding can make a difference only if there
is in fact water around.
Here's another alternative I've heard about, which appeals to my
sense of anarchy:
Drill the well with a rotary drill, then drop a stick of dynamite
down the well to crack the rock if you don't have a good flow.
Obviously, if you want to try this stunt you'll have to line
up a blaster as well as a driller.
Of course, you could drill the well with a pounding drill and
dynamite it too, to get the best odds....
Steve
|
58.4 | | ELSIE::DEMBA | | Mon Feb 10 1986 13:04 | 12 |
| I have heard of the dynamite solution also, but never found out
about the risks or results.
I have also heard that some of the well drillers use a machine
that is a combination of pounding and boring.
When I had a lot of questions about our well when we were building
I called Sullivan Well Drilling (617-779-6677) and they were very
helpful. They may add to the information you gather, however your
local well people will know more about the local conditions.
Steve
|
58.5 | Colder than a well-diggers ... | CANDY::POTUCEK | Ski Cross-Country | Mon Feb 10 1986 13:04 | 10 |
| Best Recommended in the Derry NH area is:
Armstrong Artesian Well Co.
Rt 111A
Windham NH
898-7801
/jmp
|
58.6 | Dont dynamite | GIGI::GINGER | | Mon Feb 10 1986 13:19 | 12 |
| I cant resist a well story- I nearly lost my ... drilling wells
for my summer home in Maine. 3 wells later, at $7 per foot, I have
a barely marginal well. I have now been told I should have used
a pounder for all of the reasons cited above. When #2 well went
dry I was offered dynamite and dry ice as ways to open them up.
My driller, the most popular one in the area, would not do either-
his experience was if you broke up the rock enough to do any good
you also broke it up enough that the pump couldnt be re-inserted.
My scientific, technical side says dowsers are dumb folklore. If
I ever drill another well Ill gladly pay the dowser- he/she couldnt
do any worse than a driller.
|
58.7 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Tue Feb 11 1986 11:00 | 18 |
| Re: .4
I used Sullivan (in Bolton, Mass.) when I drilled my well and
thought they were efficient, honest, and professional. You can
probably find somebody equally good closer to NH though.
Re: .6
I guess you'd have to drill, dynamite, then drill again to clear
out the rock. I would also think that the water might rise in the
drill hole far enough so you could get the pump down into the water
anyway. Assuming there is any water to rise in the first place....
I expect dynamite does fall into the desperation-move category,
but if all else fails it might be worth a try. There was a story
in Country Journal a year or two about dynamiting a well. It worked,
apparently, but the experience was quite an adventure. Other stories
I've heard or read about dynamiting wells also tend to make it sound
a little hairy. But it DOES appeal to my sense of anarchy!
Steve
|
58.8 | Local Driller | PSGMKG::WAGNER | | Tue Feb 11 1986 18:10 | 30 |
| I would recommend Dube & Son in Merrimack, NH...
They just extended my well from 100 ft to 500 ft for my heating
system. I went from 40 gallons per minute to >150 gallons per minute.
They have a number of different rigs and use what is appropriate
for the job.
They are probably one of the better drillers around. I understand
they are one of two drillers in the New England area which uses
lasers to insure accuracy on drilling (this is for a lot of deep
well commercial jobs).
I was quite satisfied with their work. Just make sure all the details
are worked out up front..
You can expect to pay anywhere from $5 to $10 a foot depending on
what they are drilling in, how deep, how much water they hit, and
whether you need casing.
I found out that the deeper you go and the more water you get the
more powerful the compressor (a well full of water at 500 ft at
over 150 gal/min takes a hell of a lot of air...). And he was drilling
in solid granite (with cracks somewhere).
You want to speak with Ron Dube 603-669-4810. Tell him I recommended
him... He is an interesting character.
Merle
|
58.9 | WATER | LEHIGH::GAGNON | | Fri Feb 14 1986 15:14 | 6 |
| .8 I'M CURIOUS WHY YOU NEEDED GREATER THAN 40 GALLONS PER MINUTE
FOR A HEATING SYSTEM?
GERRY
|
58.10 | water source heat pumps | ASGMKA::WAGNER | | Mon Feb 17 1986 19:02 | 20 |
| It wasn't the gallons I needed, it was the water column. With the
design being used it takes about 100 ft of water per ton of the
heating/cooling system.
The system I will have is a "closed loop" opposed to "pump and dump".
I could not dump since my neighbors would start complaining about
all the water. It takes about 4 gallons per minute per ton to get
the heat extraction on a "dump" system. The "dump" would have been
much cheaper but I would rather have my neighbors be nice to me.
So I get a well that can supply the town with water. I seem to be
the only one around with this amount. Dube told me I was extremely
lucky since there are a lot of people in the area who would "kill"
for that amount of water (maybe unlucky, come to think of it).
The nice thing is getting all my heat, hot water, and air conditioning
with NO fuel bills. Considering what my electric bills are now I
will cut them by almost 4 times.
Merle
|
58.11 | Town Water Pressure! | 57605::ARDINI | From the third plane. | Tue Feb 18 1986 12:28 | 5 |
| When own town water from the street, is there any way to increase
your water pressure or get the town to do it? How is it done and
how reluctant would they be to doing it? Any know this stuff?
Jorge'
|
58.12 | change/remove the pressure limiter | NEWTON::KRANTZ | | Tue Feb 18 1986 17:47 | 7 |
| usually the city water pressure is high enough (unless you live
on the fringes, or on a hill...), and there is usually a pressure
limiter installed (somewhere, I think outside the house/before
the meter???) to LOWER the city pressure to normal house
limit (40 lbs?).
Joe
|
58.13 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Wed Feb 19 1986 08:49 | 16 |
| I've generally seen the pressure regulators inside, just after the
water meter. If you've got one, it will probably be a conical or
dome-shaped gizzie about 4" high and 3" across at the base, with
a screw coming out of the top of it. There may be a tag on it stating
what pressure it is set to. I assume the screw is the adjustment,
if you know how to adjust it. Those things can fail; I remember
growing up, somebody I knew had very low water pressure at his house.
Turned out to be the pressure regulator.
If you don't have one and you really do have all the pressure the
town can give you, you could always install a supplemental pump
and a pressure tank, just like somebody would have for a well.
You'd probably be talking $500-$600, as a very rough guess.
Steve
|
58.14 | HEAT PUMPS | ERIE::GAGNON | | Wed Feb 19 1986 13:59 | 14 |
|
.10 WHAT KIND OF HEATING SYSTEM DO YOU HAVE...OOPS....I READ THE
HEADER TO YOUR NOTE THAT INDICATES THAT IT IS A HEAT PUMP. I JUST
PURCHASED A HOUSE THAT HEATS BY FHA WITH A HEAT PUMP PROVIDING THE
HEATING/COOLING. I DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HEAT PUMPS. THE HEAT
PUMP IN THE HOUSE I BOUGHT IS A CARRIER AND DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE
CONNECTED TO ANY SOURCE OF WATER AT ALL WHICH IS WHY I ASKED ABOUT
THE VOLUMES OF WATER YOU NEEDED. CAN YOU (OR ANYONE) EXPLAIN THE
PRINCIPLE BEHIND HEAT PUMPS AND HOW THEY CAN BE USED TO HEAT/COOL?
THANX
GERRY
|
58.15 | See note #62 for heat pumps | JOET::JOET | Joe Tomkowitz | Wed Feb 19 1986 14:32 | 3 |
| I'm starting a new note on heat pumps at #62.
-joet
|
58.16 | Maybe a big OOPS!! | 57605::ARDINI | From the third plane. | Thu Feb 20 1986 10:27 | 26 |
| OOPS, I may have committed a NO-NO. RE:13 I looked into the
idea of a pressure regulator in my water line around my meter.
My meter is a bell shaped device about 8" high with a round 6" base
that contours up to a 3" top. This has a flip lid on the top to
reaveal the meter display. This top meter portion is secured by
two screws that have a wire running around and thru the screws so
to protect it from tampering. I tampered. While chacking it out
I pulled the wire out. At that point I said "what the heck" and
took off the top meter instrument, after turning off the water
ofcourse. The instrument was a 2" cylinder that sat ontop of the
bell shaped device. Under the instrument was a small gear sitting
ontop of a 5/8" nut that was loosely adjusted. I then had my wife
stand by the sink upstairs and watch the water as I turned the nut.
She thought she noticed the pressure increase slightly but wasn't
sure. I gave it a full 360 turn but it did'nt make much difference.
The nut was so loose you could turn it by hand. What I would like
to know is this nut an adjustment for the accuracy of the meter
or is it actually a pressure adjustment? Did I committ a plumbing
mortal sin? Is this bell-shaped housing a pressure regulator at
all or is the whole thing just part of the meter? I think I can
fix the security wire on top OK but before I do I would like to
adjust what I can, if I can, Now that I can. Help!!!!
Jorge'
|
58.17 | "Just the facts, ma'am." | JOET::JOET | Joe Tomkowitz | Thu Feb 20 1986 12:29 | 17 |
| re: .16
THIS IS THE UTILITY POLICE!
WE KNOW YOU'RE IN THERE!
COME OUT WITH YOUR HANDS UP!
Serious plumbing faux pas on your part!
If I were you, I'd call a plumber immediately. I had a neighbor (back
in PA) whose daughter undid the seal on an electric meter and the next
time the meter reader came by, she was assesed a $150.00 fine for
"tampering".
-joet
P.S. I'm sure that the nut in question has nothing to do with water
pressure.
|
58.34 | Sealing Well from ground water | STAR::FARNHAM | Sheep must go. | Tue Jul 29 1986 08:27 | 16 |
|
We've been getting ground water seeping into the seal on our
new well during this week's downpours (we must have had in excess
of 2"/hour between 4 and 5 AM today). The seal is just below where
grade wants to be.
I'm looking for suggestions as to how to protect the well head
from ground water yet allow grade to come to a natural level
around same. What I have in mind is digging out around the well
head, surrounding it with a section of galvanized culvert set in
crushed stone.
Will this do the trick? Other ideas?
Stu
|
58.35 | concrete well tile | MAY11::WARCHOL | | Tue Jul 29 1986 12:17 | 5 |
| They make concrete well tiles that you can put around the well head
and finish the grade up to it. They may last longer than the metal
pipe. Check the yellow pages for a precast concrete supplier.
Nick
|
58.18 | Dry Ice | APTECH::BRIDE | Sonny Bride | Fri Aug 15 1986 11:19 | 28 |
| In response to how to increase your water supply:
I realize that this reply is probably months late in helping any of you
that had questions back in February but it may be of interest to future
readers.
Dynamite is not a way that I would suggest. Most areas require special
permits and the results are a bit unpredictable, not to mention dangerous.
I just had a well drilled (in NH) that went down 660 feet and resulted in
one gallon per minute. Although the static level was about 10 feet from
the top giving me a water reserve of about 900 gallons I asked what the
(realatively cheap) alternatives were that may possibly give me more GPM.
The suggestion that I went with was dry ice ($450.00). The way that it
was explained to me is that the dry ice freezes the entire column of water,
creating an enormous amount of preasure. Because the top of the well is
tightly sealed, the preasure has no way to go but out. Because of this,
every little crack that can be found is forced to expand. I am told that
this process usually yields about 2 to 3 times as many GPM. I just had
this done on my well and the results are not yet in.... I'll let you know.
If anyone else has had this done, I would be interested in hearing what
your results were.
Sonny
|
58.19 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Fri Aug 15 1986 11:41 | 5 |
| Re: .-1
Interesting idea! Can you give more details of the procedure?
And some idea of the success (or lack thereof) that you had.
Steve
|
58.20 | hope for the best | SOFCAD::KNIGHT | Dave Knight | Fri Aug 15 1986 11:52 | 3 |
| Dry Ice is a very old approach. My parents had a low delivery well
over 30 years ago that they treated with dry ice. It increased
the flow only marginally, though. Maybe it works, maybe not.
|
58.491 | Well motor and pump | SQM::KING | | Tue Sep 30 1986 11:02 | 12 |
| We are close to replacing our well motor and pump (1/3 hp Goulds,
in the basement) for our wash well.
Any recommendations on a knowledgeable individual (or firm) for
replacing the well motor and pump?
Anyone have any experience with Bob Whitney of Merrimack, NH?
Thanks,
Ed
|
58.36 | Bacteria keep getting in my well water | AKOV04::KALINOWSKI | | Tue Sep 30 1986 22:00 | 23 |
| QUESTION FOR YOU WELL EXPERTS
I HAVE MY OWN WELL IN MY FRONT YARD. I AM TOLD IT IS ABOUT
75 FT DEEP. I HAVE HAD PROBLEMS SINCE I BOUGHT THE HOUSE
3 YEARS AGO WITH BACTERIA GETTING INTO THE WATER. I POUR
A BIT OF CHLORINE DOWN THE TOP, AND EVERYTHING IS FINE FOR
A COUPLE OF MONTHS. I ORIGIALLY THOUGHT THE PROBLEM WAS
RUNOFF FROM THE HOUSE SEAPPNG PAST THE TOP, SO I DUG AROUND
THE PIPE SO THAT THE CASING WAS 12 INCHES ABOUT GROUND. I
ALSO REPLACED THE CASING( I.E. CAP, I.E. TOP) WITH A HEAVY
DUTY CAST IRON UNIT THAT IS SUPPOSE TO DO THE JOB, BUT SO FAR,
I AM STILL HAVING PROBLEMS.
I CAN TELL IT IS TIME TO PUT A BIT OF CHLORINE IN THE SYSTEM
WHEN I GET A SLIGHT SULFER SMELL IN THE SHOWER. THE SEPTIC
SYSTEM IS OVER 150 FT AWAY AND HAS NEVER GIVEN MY ANY PROBLEMS
SO I DON'T THINK IT HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH THAT.
ANY SUGGESTIONS? I AM THINKING THAT THE PIPE FOR THE WELL
MAY BE CRACKED AND THAT I MAY NEED TO HAVE A NEW WELL DRILLED.
JOHN
|
58.37 | iron in your water? | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Tue Sep 30 1986 23:08 | 10 |
| Sulphur smells are often caused by a type of bacteria typically
found in water with a significant amount of iron. This bacteria
is not harmful (I've been told).
Our well had this problem in the extreme, at one point we wondered
what color the water would be each day: black, grey, yellow, or red.
We ended up drilling a new well, but there are other solutions
involving inhouse chlorination, oxidation, filtration... read $$.
__Rich
|
58.38 | Coliform? | LATOUR::TREMBLAY | | Wed Oct 01 1986 09:17 | 23 |
|
Have you had you water tested lately? Most wells have a small
"background" bacteria count that is technically OK (but in my
case, too contaminated to pass the well if inspected during a
home sale). If the bacteria is Coliform, you can have your water
tested to see if its actually fecal contamination or seepage
from your septic system. In the last case, other bacteria will
show up in the water test which can confirm your suspicions or
not. In the former case (fecal contamination) it sounds like you
did everything to try and prevent it....unless there is a dead animal
in your well (I mean this seriously, actually its very common from
what I was told when I went though my well ordeals). What ever,
get professional advice when taking a water sample, it is extremely
easy to contaminate a water sample, especially one taken from a
kitchen sink.
Also, if you believe that your problem is in the line going
from the well to your house that easy to detect, just take two
water samples, one from the well another from your house, the well
sample should be relatively "clean" or atleast a much lower bacteria
count.
/Glenn Tremblay
|
58.492 | Go with Wash Well Co | EN::FRIEDRICHS | | Wed Oct 01 1986 09:58 | 13 |
| When I had a problem with my Goulds pump, I had Wash Well Co in
Merrimack come and take a look. (I think that is Bob Whitney's
Co.) He was all set to replace the switch assembly ($30 some odd
dollars just for the switch) when he figured out that a rust buildup
was clogging the feed to the switch. All he charged was $15 for
the service call, but, he also showed me how to clean it.
He said he was the one that had installed the wash well in our house
8 years ago, so he's been around for awhile.
Cheers,
jeff
|
58.39 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Wed Oct 01 1986 10:19 | 15 |
|
Your problem could still be runoff. Not sure whether this applies to
deep wells, but for dug (shallow) wells the first thing you try is sealing
the top seam or two between the concrete collars (or between the fieldstones
if the well is walled with stone). So my guess is that runoff or surface
water gets into a well somewhere in the top three or four feet.
So putting a new casing a foot above ground probably doesn't have any effect
as the "surface" water is really below the surface of the ground.
Maybe you should dig down a couple of feet around the pipe and see if there's
a crack.
JP
|
58.40 | more well woes | ROLL::CIAVOLA | | Wed Oct 01 1986 14:46 | 10 |
| I'm afraid I have a simular problem. We just bought our house about
3 months ago, and had the shallow well tested at the time with no
problems. Now, we are noticing a slight sewer-like smell (grose!)
when we first turn on the tap. Needless to say, we drink spring
water. Both mine, and the neighbors leach field is much to far
away for that to be the problem, and if it was, I can't see how
that could happen in just 3 months. We are having a bacteria test
done now. The thought of digging another well, after just buying
a house is frightning!
|
58.41 | Test your water | FURILO::KENT | Peter | Wed Oct 01 1986 22:24 | 21 |
| It sounds like you need a water test. I have used WaterTest in
Manchester, NH twice already. We have lived in this house 4+ years
and the first time was to find out why we had a slight sulphur smell.
The 2nd time was for a refinancing (DCU). It gives you
real piece of mind, not only because of possible Coliform bacteria,
but also for other possible contaminants. Their basic test for
some $70 (including return express) includes: Arsenic, Cadmium,
pH, Nitrate, Silver, Chloride, Manganese, Hardness, Lead, Nickel,
Magnesium, Alkalinity, Barium, Chromium, Mercury, Selenium, Fluoride,
Iron, Sodium, Zinc, Total Coliform, Copper, Potassium, Sulfate,
Calcium, and total dissolved solids. The list shows how much your
well (water supply) tested next to the Maximum Contaminant Levels set
by the Safe Drinking Water Act or WaterTest's recommended limits.
It turns out that we had some non-coliform bacteria (iron bacteria),
which is not harmful and we have gotten used to the slight odor.
WaterTest will also do more thorough analysis for other type
contaminants, such as hydrocarbons (if you live next to a gas station
for example), etc.
|
58.42 | GET IT TESTED | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Thu Oct 02 1986 08:53 | 15 |
| I second getting a water test. I had my water tested by Chemserve
in Milford, NH. for about $45, which is a small price to pay for
getting piece of mind. My well water in our new house had 20+ parts
per million of iron along with some high maganese levels. As a result,
every time you brought the water up to your mouth to drink, your
nose would try to jump off your face. I had a couple of water treatment
people come over my house and give me free advice about how to fix
the problem, the catch is they want to sell you their equipment
and some of the prices they were giving me ran from 2800 to 4400
dollars. Because I'm pretty handy I decided to use their
recommendations for which type of equipment to get and try a buy
it cheaper from a plumbing supply house. The bottom line is I purchased
the recommended equipment for around $1600 and installed it one
saturday. Our water is great now and I feel the money was well spent.
|
58.43 | shallow well? | FROST::SIMON | Gary Simon - BTO Quality Engineering | Thu Oct 02 1986 09:44 | 14 |
|
re .4(?)
If you have a shallow well, why don't you pop the cover and peer
on into the well. You may find a mouse or mole or something like
that. I have a shallow well and have had to remove dead moles
twice before a replaced the top with one that fit better. Also
ground water could be getting into the well. By popping the lid
and examining it you may be able to figure out what is happening.
Also it wouldn't hurt to get it tested...
-gary
|
58.44 | good luck - you will need it! | RICKS::ROCHA | | Thu Oct 02 1986 10:51 | 21 |
| The sulfur type smell is hydrogen-sulfate or sulfide. Its in a gas form
and requires a special water test. Tell your water test source that you
want to test for this and they should give you two sample bottles.
One for a standard test and another for the H-S. Fill the H-S
sample bottle completely to the top (NO AIR) and cap it.
I have a 600ft deep well with .27PPM. I solved the problem with
aeration and activated charcoal filtration (total cost $500). The smell
is gone and the water tastes fine. I back-wash the filter approximately
once a year. After 2 years of use my annual cost are $0.00. This
level is low! Most commercial systems are designed to deal with levels
of 1 to 2PPM and industrial systems even higher levels. If you can, stay
away from chemical solutions! Also beware that there are as many solutions
to this problem as there are source available!!!!!! I had estimates from
$1k to $2.5k.
The source of H-S is decay. The decay can be simple ,leaching
of bed rock, to complex, industrial pollution. Pick what ever you want!
H-S is a corrosive in high concentrations otherwise low levels are considered
harmless.
|
58.45 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Thu Oct 02 1986 14:26 | 16 |
| Possible sources of leaks:
Around the well cap (you've fixed that, in theory, with a new
cap)
A cracked well casing (cure: new well, probably)
Poor seal between casing and the bedrock (cure: new well, probably)
Leak where the "pitless adapter" goes through the casing (cure:
possibly/probably fixable?)
The "pitless adapter" is basically a special elbow that bolts through
the side of the well casing. The water line coming up from the
bottom of the well goes into it on the inside, and the water line
to the house comes out of it on the outside. It's generally about
4' below ground level; take off the well cap and you can probably
see it. Maybe the source of a leak?
Steve
|
58.46 | | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Fri Oct 03 1986 16:46 | 7 |
| re .6: >> The bottom line is I purchased the recommended equipment for
>> around $1600 and installed it one saturday.
What kind of equipment did you install? Where did you purchase
it?
__Rich
|
58.47 | Bruner Treatment Equipment | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Mon Oct 06 1986 08:51 | 16 |
| I bought all Bruner brand equipment. I liked it because it was the
only equipment I found with 1" inlet/outlet thus allowing for only
a slight pressure drop throughout the system. Bruner will also perform
a free water test and recommend what equipment to install. I bought
a BR14 iron filter (requires no chemicals and has a large iron removing
capacity between backflushing), a F10-AN, which brings my PH up
from around 6.2 to 7.0, and their smallest water softener (forgot
the model#) to remove any maganese,iron, hardness that was left.
I bought all the equipment from F.W.Webb in Merrimack, NH. This
source deals only in wholesale sales, but if you say your building
a house or something like that and are willing to pay in either
cash or a bank check, they'll do business with you. You can also
get the Bruner equipment at Capitol Plumbing in Nashua. It is not
all that difficult to install. If you can sweat pipe and read
instructions you'll do fine. Let us know how you make out.
|
58.21 | Dry Ice - Worked For Me | NACHO::BRIDE | Sonny Bride | Fri Oct 10 1986 11:41 | 3 |
| The Dry Ice method did make a difference, although not as much as I
would have liked. My flow doubled from 1 to 2 GPM.
|
58.48 | | MILT::JACKSON | You're livin' in your own private Idaho | Tue Oct 21 1986 14:06 | 28 |
| My fathers house had this problem. It turned out to be Hydrogen
Sulfide and a very high iron content. As .11 did, he had a company
(in western PA, General Ionics, I think) come out and recommend
what he needed. It turned out that he needed
Chlorinator Turns the H2S and iron into something
that can be filtered (I don't remember)
Charcoal filter Filters the stuff out
And then a softner his water was REALLY hard
The cholorinator has a holding tank in which he mixes about 1 gal
Chlorine bleach with 20 or so gals of water and a small pump that
pumps the stuff into the pressure tank when the well pump is running.
Next the water goes through the filter and then into the softner
(well, all but one hard water line to the kitchen sink, drinking
soft water sucks)
All told, it cost him somewhere on theorder of $1500.00 (about 5
years ago) He hasn't had any problems since it was installed, and
the chlorine is cheap enough (it lasts about 1 year between fillings)
-bill
|
58.498 | drilling new well. | ROLL::CIAVOLA | | Tue Oct 28 1986 12:10 | 19 |
| We're looking into having a well drilled. Our shallow well
just doesn't supply us with enough water. Can anyone suggest
someone who will handle the entire job, including any sub-
contracting that might need to be done? Also, any advice
would be appreciated. We live in Templeton Mass.
Thanks
Pam
|
58.499 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Tue Oct 28 1986 13:13 | 33 |
| There are basically three parts to the job:
Drilling the well
Digging a trench for the pipe from the well to the house
Installing the pump and pipe
When I got my well drilled, I didn't have too much trouble lining
up people myself for each of the jobs. The well driller was available
within a couple of weeks, if I remember correctly. After he'd done
his thing, I called a local guy with a backhoe to come dig the trench,
and called somebody else to deliver some sand to fill over the pipe
with. I also bought some 4" plastic drain pipe to run the well
pipe through, as protection.
As soon as I got all that lined up I arranged with a well pump place
for a time to install the pump, and once again there didn't seem
to be big problems getting them scheduled. All in all, it wasn't
too bad to manage. Like you, I had a well that mostly worked, so
I wasn't dealing with an emergency situation.
For what it's worth, I used E.R. Sullivan in Bolton for a well driller,
and Scott Associates in Clinton to install the pump and pipe. I
thought Sullivan was very good; the people from Scott were adequate
but not impressive. (Depends on whom you get; they have one guy
who is really good, but a couple of other people happened to get
assigned to my job.)
As far as finding one contractor to take care of everything...I
don't know of anybody offhand. You can probably find somebody
to do it, but I think you'd find that it really isn't that big
a deal to handle it yourself assuming you get responsible contractors
to begin with. The two main ones are the well driller and the pump
person. You might find somebody out in your area who does it all,
which certainly would be convenient. I guess the main thing is
to ask around and get opinions about who is good. At your town
hall, maybe? My town clerk knows everything about everybody.
Steve
|
58.500 | Wells and pumps | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Tue Oct 28 1986 14:14 | 11 |
| Since Steve was barely satisfied with his pump person, I'll
recommend Need Pump company in Sterling. After they installed
the pump they let me borrow their big drill for a couple days to
drill thru my basement wall for my plumbing outlet. I thought
that was nice of them since they didn't know me at all.
I also used Ed Sullivan in Bolton, and was as satisfied with them
as I would have been with anyone. (I still think that well drillers
just keep drilling till it's time to go home regardless of when
they hit water).
|
58.501 | Scott | SNICKR::PIERPONT | | Tue Oct 28 1986 20:48 | 2 |
| Things at Scott Assoc may be changing due to the death of the head
of the company.
|
58.502 | Just A Suggestion | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Oct 29 1986 07:40 | 20 |
| May I make a suggestion, believing that it has worked for me. Check
with your closeat neighbors on the depth and production (gallons
per minute) of their wells. If your area appears to have alot of
deep, very low production wells, you might want to consider having
your well drilled via the old pounding method rather then the rotary
percussion drilling method. I'm convinced that the extra cost per
foot is worth it. For example, this past year I built a new home
in an area where the adjacent neighbors had wells that were in excess
of 500+ feet deep with all less then 1/2 gallon per minute production.
All the neighbors wells had been rotary drilled. I decided to have
my well pounded instead of rotary drilled and my well turned out
to be 350' deep with 2 1/2 gallons per minute. I admitt that 2 1/2
gallons per minute is not all that great but it sure beats out any
of my neighbors.
Pounding a well will take about 10 times longer to do then a rotary
drilled well, and will cost about 3 to 4 dollars more per foot pounded,
but if the well runs shallower with more production, its more then
washes out.
P.S. there are some good discussions about well drilling elsewhere
in this note file.
|
58.503 | Pounding vs. drilling | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Wed Oct 29 1986 08:18 | 4 |
| re: .4 - Why do you think that pounding your well was the reason
you have a shallower well than your neighbors?
|
58.504 | | STAR::FARNHAM | Stu Farnham, VMS | Wed Oct 29 1986 08:25 | 7 |
|
re: .5
I believe this has been discussed elsewhere. Drilling tends to
produce a smooth, almost polished bore; pounding tends to crack
the bedrock surrounding the bore, and provide better infiltration.
|
58.505 | SHATTERING experience | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Oct 29 1986 12:02 | 14 |
| re: .5, .4
As stated in the previous entry, pounding shatters its way through
the bedrock while, rotary drilling bores a nice smooth hole. I happened
to be on my building site installing the lolly columns in the cellar
the day the pounding rig started drilling. When he lifts and drops
that star drill bit, the whole ground shook, like a localized earth
quake. The bit weighs nearly 3000 lbs and hits with incredible force.
The ground shaking lessens as the pounder drills deeper. At about
100' or 150' you don't feel much but the noise of the bit hitting
can still be heard. I believe that method of drilling has got to
crack open close water veins that would normally be passed by by
a rotary drill, thus the extra water sooner. In fact I got most
of my water in the top 100 ft of the well. I just had him continue
to 350' so I'd have adequate reserve.
|
58.506 | artesian vs. gravel | ROLL::CIAVOLA | | Wed Oct 29 1986 14:07 | 9 |
|
In addition, can anyone list pros and cons comparing artesian wells
vs. gravel packed?
I looked through some previous notes, but didn't find much.
thanks
Pam
|
58.507 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Wed Oct 29 1986 15:31 | 60 |
|
Maybe we need to define some terminology. Here's a first cut -- please
correct me if I get anything wrong.
Artesian -- Natural or drilled well in which hydrostatic pressure forces
well water to the surface (very few people have an artesian well).
Deep well -- Drilled well, usually deeper than 32 feet, in which water is
pumped to the surface. The pump can be at the bottom or the
top of the well. If it is at the top, then it must use what
is called a recirculating jet pump because atmospheric pressure
alone won't let you "draw" water up more than 32 feet.
Shallow or
Dug well -- usually 32 feet or less in depth, usually 2-3 feet in diameter,
faced with stone or concrete collars.
The disadvantages to shallow wells are that they are easily contaminated
by surface water, by animals falling in, and so forth. The advantages are
that they are relatively cheap to dig and the pumps are a bit cheaper.
Shallow wells of course tend to dry up sooner than deep wells.
There are a couple of disadvantages to deep wells. They are expensive to
dig and because the pumps are often in the well, they are vulnerable to
lightning strikes. If your pump is at the bottom of the well and it takes
a lighting strike, it can be very expensive to replace.
While shallow wells are more prone to surface contamination, deep wells
are more prone to other types of contamination, like toxic waste dumps
in the neighborhood. This is because shallow wells draw their water from
a much smaller area than deep wells:
\ | | / \ | | /
\ | | / \ | | /
\ | | / \ | | /
\ | | / \ | | /
\| |/ \ | | /
\ | | /
\ | | /
shallow well \ | | /
\ | | /
\ | | /
\ | | /
\| |/
deep well
I don't know whether this is coincidence, but in my town, deep wells
always deliver very hard water; usually it's bad enough to require a
pretty sophisticated filtering system.
Hope this helps...
JP
|
58.508 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Wed Oct 29 1986 17:06 | 11 |
| To some extent the choice of type of well is determined by where
it's going to be. If you have solid ledge 5' down there's probably
no way you'll have a gravel well, for example. I don't think there's
any particular advantage of one over the other, except as noted
in previous replies about contamination, (probable) relative hardness
of the water, etc. Of course, the shallow well will be cheaper.
I'd say, if your terrain permits a shallow well that will give you
sufficient volume there's no particular reason not to go that route
and save some money.
Steve
|
58.509 | thanks! | ROLL::CIAVOLA | | Thu Oct 30 1986 14:35 | 6 |
|
Thanks again all, for your explainations and suggestions!
Pam
|
58.510 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Thu Oct 30 1986 15:39 | 17 |
|
Before you go out and get a new well drilled (or until the new well
gets drilled), there are a couple of things you might try to increase
the amount of water available.
Shallow wells can get silted up. You might try climbing down into the
well (in the process, you'll learn what they mean by "cold as a well
digger's feet") and seeing how much mud/sand/silt you can haul out in
buckets. If there's any water at all in the well, the volume of dirt
removed will be replaced by water.
Often the foot valve in a well is a couple of feet above the bottom to
avoid getting crud in the valve. You could try cheating a little bit
and dropping the intake closer to the bottom.
JP
|
58.511 | Gap Mountain Water Wells, Fitzwilliam NH | BEING::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Sat Nov 01 1986 13:58 | 27 |
| re .0 - don't know how close it is to your area, but we just had
a well drilled by John Holman, who is Gap Mountain Water Wells in
Fitzwilliam NH. I know that he covers a pretty good territory because
he mentioned being down around Boston shortly before doing our well.
Concerning choices and research, we had investigated our neighbors, we
have several with dug wells and several with drilled wells in the area.
We have lots of ground water but almost everyone we talked to seemed to
favor drilling if we could swing it, including the contractor who
would've dug it for us, so we decided to drill. Our closest neighbor is
also a new house, they drilled a well this summer and ended up drilling
3 holes and going down something like 600' to get any water. The
neighbor above us on the hilltop has a well down about 120' with
adequate flow, and the one at the bottom of the other side of the hill
had a true artesian that was difficult to cap because of the flow rate
when it was drilled, years ago.
Our results seem ok to me (betterm actually, I'm ecstatic, at least
until I get the water analyzed): we drilled 220' with about 20' to 30'
of casing, and got "approx. 50+ gpm" - the plumber told me he had a
rough time drilling through the casing for the outlet pipe because the
water level in the well was 1' above the outlet hole (which is 5.5'
below ground level) - so we're pretty close to a true artesian!
I don't know if the driller should get credit for the quality of
our well, but we felt good about doing business with him even before
it was drilled and we certainly can't complain about the results.
|
58.565 | Hesitating shallow well pump | SWTPEA::COUTURE | | Fri Nov 07 1986 10:44 | 22 |
| I am having a minor problem with a water pump. It is a Well-x-Trol
with a Well-Trol expansion tank (a small one maybe a couple of
gallons). It is for a shallow well that is only used for outside
faucets.
I have a 1� feed line with a check valve resting inside a plastic
bucket on the bottom floor of the well.
The problem is that when the pressure in the expansion tank is
reduced there is a LONG pause before the pump kicks in (sometimes
it may be a couple of minutes). This happens each time the presure
is drawn from the tank. Once the pump starts there is enough to
fill the tank and shut off but it is the wait that causes a
long period of no water thats causing the problem.
Any ideas on what to look for...
Thanks
Steve
|
58.566 | Just a Guess! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Fri Nov 07 1986 11:47 | 5 |
| I'm far from being an expert on the subject but it sounds like your
cut-in/out switch is either defective or way out of adjustment.
This switch is usually located on the supply line out to the well,
and just before your storage tank.
|
58.567 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Fri Nov 07 1986 14:06 | 14 |
| First thing to check is the kick-in/kick-out settings, as .1 says. Just
watch the pressure valve and see how low the pressure gets before the
pump kicks in. My pump kicks in at 20 lb/in� and out at 40 lb/in�, so
if yours is 'way below that, you might want to adjust the kick-in
setting.
If that's not the problem, it might be that your expansion tank needs
a shot of air (assuming it's really an expansion tank and not just a
holding tank). I think that the proper pressure depends on
the kick-in/kick-out settings on the pump, so it's hard to say what
is the right pressure (mine is set to 25 lb/in�). You might have to
talk to the people you bought the pump from.
JP
|
58.22 | <WELL DRILLERS LOVE THEIR GAME> | NETMAN::MORIN | | Fri Nov 07 1986 23:19 | 29 |
| I THINK ANYONE WHO IS ABOUT TO DRILL AN ART. WELL OUGHT TO KNOW A FACT
OF LIFE. THE WELL DRILLER REALLY DOSEN'T CARE ABOUT YOUR POCKET.
SO YOU HAVE TO PROTECT YOURSELF AND DO A LITTLE RESERCH. THE DRILLER
WILL DRILL A HOLE IN YOUR POCKET IF YOU LET HIM. THERE IS NO NEED
TO DRILL BEYOND THREE HUNDRED FEET. THE TECHNOLOGY THAT BROUGHT
THE ROTORY DRILL ALSO BROUGHT ALONG WITH ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE IT
CALL HYDRO FRACKING. A WELL DRILLER WILL NOT TELL YOUR ABOUT THIS
PROCESS BECAUSE IT CUT BACK ON HIS PROFIT. IT WORKS ON THE SAME
IDEA AS THE CABLE TOOL. IT USES AIR PRESSURE AND WATER TO OPEN THE
WATER VEINS SEALED BY ROTORY DRILLING. MY NEIGHBOR DRILLED A DRY
HOLE FOR THREE HUNDRED FEET. AFTER THE DRILLER HYDRO FRACKED THE
YEILDED 30 GALLONS A MIN. AS A MATTER OF FACT THE WELL HAD TO BE
SEALED WITH A SOLID CAP TO STOP IT FROM RUNNING OVER. THE MORAL
OF THE STORY IS THE WELL DRILLER REALLY DOSN'T GIVE A **** ABOUT YOU.
HE WILL DRILL FOR OIL IF YOU LET HIM. THE AVERAGE PERSON FIGURES
THE MAN KNOWS HIS BUSINESS. HE KNOWS THE BUSINESS ALL RIGHT AND
IF YOU ARE NOT CAREFUL HE WILL GIVE IT TO YOU! DON'T GET ME WRONG
THERE ARE A FEW WELL CONTRACTORS OUT THERE THAT WILL GIVE YOU A
FAIR SHAKE. BUT FOR EVERY ONE OF THEM THERE ARE TWENTY THAT WILL
TAKE YOU TAKE EVERY BUCK YOU GOT AND THEN SOME. IN TWO DAYS A WELL
DRILLER CAN BE DOWN SIX HUNDRED FEET IN 1985 WHEN I BUILT MY HOUSE
THAT WAS OVER FIVE THOUSAND $$$$. SO ALL I CAN SAY IS DON'T BE TAKEN
IN BY THESE GUYS. DO A LITTLE INVESTIGATING BEFORE YOU DRILL. AND
BEWARE OF WELL CONTRACTORS THAT ADVERTISE "DRILL BEFORE U BUILD".
FOR MORE INFO:
CONTACT JIM MORIN @ NETMAN::MORIN
|
58.23 | shhh... | STAR::FARNHAM | Just another geek with an attitude. | Sat Nov 08 1986 10:20 | 10 |
|
re: .22
Please don't shout. Give your readers a break and use mixed case.
Upper case gets hard on the eyes in a hurry.
Thanks,
Stu.
|
58.24 | <Attitude? What attitude?> | NETMAN::MORIN | | Mon Nov 10 1986 22:16 | 13 |
|
re: .23
I apologize for being loud but I hope the NOTE enlighten future
home builders that you do not have to spend big bucks to get water.
regards
jim morin
|
58.25 | | KAOFS::PATTERSON | | Tue Nov 11 1986 07:54 | 4 |
| re .22
Why should we beware of contractors that advertise 'drill before
u build'???? Wouldn't it be better to know whether or not you have
water on your property before you invest in house construction?
|
58.26 | RE: DRILL BEFORE YOU BUILD | NETMAN::MORIN | | Tue Nov 11 1986 17:57 | 21 |
|
RE: .25
You are right about having an ample supply of water before
construction. You probably have a good size bank account too. The
one thing a well driller does not want to hear is that you are running
on a limited budget. Again there are alternatives. I live in the
Monadnock Region and could have dug a well with no problem. the
point I am trying to make is this. Most drillers know they have
the majority of do-it-yourselfers' over the barrel. And if you
let him, he will drill you broke. Tell me how many note users have
hired a contractor gone to work and come home the man is down three hundred
and there is minimal water. comes back the next day drills three
hundred feet more and there is no inprovement in the flow. Then
he tells he coming back tommorrow to drill another hundred feet
so there will be enough water storage in the column. If there was
water at three hundred the home owner could told the driller to
take a hike and hired another cotractor that does Hydro fracking
and probably would gotten more water for half the money. Remember
these men are in a business that most people know very little
about.
|
58.27 | They got my money | SARLAC::HARTWELL | Dave Hartwell | Thu Nov 13 1986 15:35 | 17 |
| I know what you mean. I built my own house in Boxboro Ma. and hired
E.R. Sullivan out of Bolton.... I stopped by after a day of drilling
and I heard "where's the water" How deep I asked, "365 feet, not
much water yet". Weeelllll at 565 feet they stopped, I had approx.
2-3 gallons per minute, but was told that my 850 gallon water coloum
would suffice my needs, as long as I did not water my lawn for extended
periods of time.... Well I thought the other wells were about 600
feet, At least I hit water. Last month a contractor built a house
on the next lot... Went down approx 350 feet with little water,
the driller WELL TECH brought in their HYDRO FRACTURE machine, the
result, 30 gallons per minute. Yeah the sucker was expensive to
use but it was cheaper than a 565 foot well. I wish I had known
about the HYDRO FRACTURE machine....
Dave
|
58.94 | Lead in drinking water. | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Mon Nov 17 1986 13:23 | 24 |
| Anyone know the facts about the Copper/Lead issue recently being
reported on???
I am doing quite abit of plumbing for some newly added rooms and
noticed that the invoice from SOMERVILLE LUMBER, right below the
line item for the LEAD-SOLDER, was written "Not Suitable for
Potable water" or something like that. I have also started seeing
news reports on LEAD in the drinking water.
For the new rooms, I have started using 100% Tin solder. Seems to
work as well if not better. A little more expensive though.
Has anyone ever tried to replace their exist connections that are
LEAD soldered with new, TIN soldered connections????
Looks like alot of work. Infact, I know it will be if I do it.
Should I just continue to run cold/hot water for awhile BEFORE
each use? Install a timed flush unit (dumps n gallons every x hours)
at the end of the line?
Any comments?
Mark
|
58.95 | self-limiting problem? | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Mon Nov 17 1986 13:40 | 12 |
|
I hope someone can back me up on this. At the end of the second day
of lead solder scare broadcasts, the last thing I heard from National
Public Radio on the subject was, "This only matters in new housing --
after a couple of years, all the available lead will have been leached
out."
If that is true, it would have been nice if they'd said it first. But
it probably wouldn't have sold as many papers...
JP
|
58.96 | lead precipitation test | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Mon Nov 17 1986 13:50 | 10 |
| Harken back to high school/college chemistry class -
Pull a sample over the course of a day, and try the precipitation
test for lead. Not precise, nor even quantiative, but should
tell whether you have a problem with your plumbing.
I'll probably run that test one of these weekends (new house, lots
of what appears to be Sn/Pb joints).
Dwight
|
58.97 | how many ppm? | ALIEN::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Mon Nov 17 1986 15:33 | 4 |
| re .2 - it's been been awhile... :-(
how sensitive is that test? how does that sensitivity compare with
acceptable levels for potable water?
|
58.98 | new houses only | FSTVAX::FOSTER | Frank Foster -- Cincinnati Kid | Tue Nov 18 1986 08:56 | 19 |
| > Public Radio on the subject was, "This only matters in new housing --
> after a couple of years, all the available lead will have been leached
> out."
Earlier this year, when I was still living in the Washington area, one
of the TV stations there did a report on this (you know, one of
those week-long things by their "consumer reporter".) Their conclusion
was basically the same -- that the scare only applied to houses less than
three years old and that in those houses all one needed to do was
run the water for 5 minutes or so each morning before drawing any to drink.
> If that is true, it would have been nice if they'd said it first. But
> it probably wouldn't have sold as many papers...
It was Wednesday or Thursday of the week before they mentioned that it
only applied to new houses.
Frank
|
58.99 | Last of the LEADed solder | AMULET::YELINEK | | Tue Nov 18 1986 09:09 | 8 |
| Happened to pick up some supplies this past weekend, all sorts of
copper elbows, tees, couplings, and the like....bill came to $20.00
$10.00 of which was spent on SOLDER: 95% TIN - 5% ANTIMONY; meets
ASTM specs. The supply house said they stopped selling solder
containing lead all together. For the amount of plumbing I do...it'll
last forever.
Mark - one of the many weekend plumbers
|
58.100 | re .3 - qualitative test | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Tue Nov 18 1986 12:41 | 12 |
| re .3 "how many ppm"
My thoughts were on conducting a QUALITATIVE test only; ie,
is lead present. Given a positive, there then exists positive,
that is to say 'clear and present', motivation to spend the
time/money in having a professional, certifiable, test performed.
Credance is given to this procedure by the current attempts
to have the minimum limits (Pb harmful to humans) significantly
lowered.
Dwight
|
58.101 | re .2 - what is the test? | HPSCAD::GODSELL | | Tue Nov 18 1986 13:04 | 5 |
| How do you do the precipitation test for lead?
Thanks,
Sue
|
58.102 | still want to know sensitivity | ALIEN::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Tue Nov 18 1986 17:52 | 6 |
| re .6 - the qualitative test is still not good unless it is sensitive
to the lowest level of toxicity. Otherwise, it could give a negative
(clean) result when there were in fact Pb levels below the test
sensitivity but above the toxic threshold. I would consider such a
false negative result highly undesirable because it would give a false
sense of security.
|
58.103 | I don't think there is a DIY test | KELVIN::RPALMER | Handyman in Training | Wed Nov 19 1986 13:44 | 8 |
|
As a Mass. Licenced Wastewater Treatment Engineer (don't
ask, I thought I might want to do it for a career, so I took the
test) I can tell you that finding lead in the 1-10 ppm range is
difficult to do using Atomic Absorbtion and is damn near impossible
to do by precipitation. Drinking water standards are in the part
per billion range. I doubt if there is a simple home type test.
I know that Cambridge Analytical will run a sample for about $50.
|
58.104 | Collect all water in system FIRST, then sample. | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Wed Nov 19 1986 15:27 | 9 |
| Regarding having a sample taken. I looked into it and they pointeds
out that the water should be run into a larger container for the
entire volume of the Pipes in concern so to capture ALL the
water in the system, THEN draw out a sample. They do this because
the concentrations will be GREATLY varied depending on how close
to a connection the water happened to be standing for a long period
of time.
Mark
|
58.105 | Red Water | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 04 1986 08:25 | 17 |
| Time for a water problem. Every month or two I get RED water out of one
of my faucets, as in rust! The question is where is it coming from? I
had had the water tester for iron around a year ago and it was fine.
Could something be building up in the pipes themselves? It's a little
too early to make a complete analysis of the situation but when it
happened last nite it was from a faucet that hadn't been turned on for
around 4 days. While the "dirty" water was coming out I turned on
another and it was clear! This tells me that the problem couldn't be at
the well.
Could it be that my water has since gotten higher levels of iron in it?
I hate to go to the expense to get it tested again, but I fear I may
have to.
Any thoughts?
-mark
|
58.106 | Is it hot water only? | KELVIN::RPALMER | Handyman in Training | Thu Dec 04 1986 10:11 | 7 |
|
Does the red water always come out of the hot water tap? Rust,
dirt, and other goodies settle out of the water while sitting in
the hot water tank. You can open the tap on the bottom of the
tank and bleed off some water to help clear this up. I do it every
month, and my hot water is now much cleaner.
=Ralph=
|
58.107 | iron water | ROLL::CIAVOLA | | Thu Dec 04 1986 11:22 | 8 |
|
The Water Softening Store in Ayer, Mass will test for iron and heavy
metals for free. If it is coming out of the hot water tap only,
I was told that the heat reacts with the iron causing the cloudy/
rust color. The cold water tap on the other hand, will still come
out clear.
pam
|
58.108 | Caution on Draining Heaters | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Thu Dec 04 1986 11:52 | 11 |
| re .1
If I remember correctly, an earlier note concerning hot water
problems or heaters had a reply that said if your hot water heater was
old and had never been drained then draining may do more harm then good.
I think the problem had to do with leaks once all that crap was disturbed.
If you have an older heater you may want to go back and read that note.
Sorry, I don't remember which one it was. Anyone else remember this?
George
|
58.109 | Found It! | FRSBEE::PAGLIARULO | | Thu Dec 04 1986 12:18 | 5 |
| re -.1
The note about flushing hot water heaters is note 350.
George
|
58.110 | I forgot to mention I don't have a water tank | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 04 1986 16:45 | 6 |
| Good answers but they don't apply. I have a tankless system, but keep
the answers coming. Since it doesn't occur too often, I will have to
check the hot/cold theory anyways. I do know that hot water can hold
more crap in solution, so this could indeed be a clue.
-mark
|
58.111 | Fire dept. flushing hydrants nearby? | CHAPLN::ROSENTHAL | Out to break Murphy's Law! | Fri Dec 05 1986 11:49 | 13 |
|
I'm not sure if this would apply to your situation, but while
in college, once in a while, dark, red, rusty water would come
through the pipes... always while in the shower or while
brushing teeth! It was a pretty disgusting sight.
After a little investigation, we found out it happened when
the campus fire department flushed the hydrants.
Could this apply in your case?
d
|
58.112 | | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Dec 05 1986 12:29 | 4 |
| Just shows how much detail one needs to go into... I have a well, so
it's a completely self-contained system.
-mark
|
58.113 | Flushing hydrants to remove rust | VINO::TREMBLAY | | Fri Dec 05 1986 13:10 | 10 |
| RE:.6
Just for the record, they flush fire hydrants to remove
the rust that has settled in the water mains. My father works for
a water company and they have several areas that need to be flush
on a regular basis (or by demand of water users when the water gets
unbearable again). Usually this occurs more frequently in the summer
when water demand is high and the rust gets stirred out of its settling
places.
/Glenn
|
58.114 | | BUGSY::CARIGNAN | Don Carignan | Fri Dec 05 1986 16:37 | 14 |
|
We also have a well and had a red-water "incident" a couple
of days ago. The system was drained while we were replacing
our storage tank (bladder broke on the old one). When we turned
the water back on, the water was pretty rusty for a while since
the system got really flushed out.
I assume you are having no problem with pump over/under cycling?
Also, do you have a water filter with replaceable cartriges?
If you do, and haven't replaced it lately, check it out.
The filter may be torn, allowing the iron through.
- Don
|
58.115 | Add a filter to take care of future problems. | GENRAL::RYAN | | Mon Dec 08 1986 12:17 | 10 |
| Future fix is to place a inline filter in the cullinary water supply.
Be prepared to replace the fiber filter a few times before the system
purges itself. After that try using a activated charcoal filter
to remove any taste. We had a period of time in Sunnyvale California
during the drout a few years back. We added the filter to remove
the grunge from the well water when the city went to the standby
water supply. (Sunnyvale usually get their water from the San Francisco
water supply from the Sierras).
/calvin hoe
|
58.116 | Gone West for the winter? | SAVAGE::LOCKRIDGE | | Mon Dec 08 1986 12:20 | 3 |
| Maybe the Red Tide's moved inland for the winter! :-)
-Bob
|
58.28 | Another View | ENGINE::MAY | | Thu Jan 08 1987 15:25 | 20 |
| I am currently helping my brother in law construct a house in Athol.
I agree with the past several replies about the well drilling
companies. He had a contract for x$ for three hundred feet and x+y$
for the 400 hundred max agreed to. Not enough water at 300 feet,
but more than enough at 400.
Just as a matter of interest the Town of Athol requires not only
an approved lot plan with septic system, but also a well with TESTED
water results in hand, before issuing a building permit.
I would suspect that most small towns will be considering this type
of restrictive building permits (tariff?) to relieve the strain
on town municipal services, with the upcomming expansion of bedroom
communities.
Of course, it is nice to know that the water you have is not going
to kill you.
dana
|
58.29 | Real artesian wells | YODA::BARANSKI | Laugh when you feel like Crying! | Fri Jan 09 1987 11:36 | 6 |
| What's the chances of having a real *artisian* well in various parts of NE?
I.E. a well that water flows out of without pumping...
I imagine that it would be real tough to make your own well... Too Bad!
Jim.
|
58.30 | This Old House | FURILO::KENT | Peter | Fri Jan 09 1987 12:40 | 2 |
| Last night's "This Old House" dealt with well drilling. Catch it
on Saturday night if you missed it.
|
58.31 | artesian wells | BEING::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Fri Jan 09 1987 18:11 | 9 |
| re .29 - I was told that when they drilled for a house the other side
of the hill from ours they had a stream flowing out of the well for a
couple of weeks until they were able to cap it - seems that it isn't
quite usual enough for the necessary capping to be common technology.
our well goes down 220' and when the plumber drilled for the outlet
pipe he found he was a foot below the water line, so we were pretty
close to having a "true" artesian well ourselves (but, thankfully,
not quite like the neighbors).
|
58.117 | Well in the house? | DSSDEV::CHALTAS | | Mon Jan 12 1987 08:01 | 10 |
| We're looking for ways to add on to our house. One of the more
reasonable directions to expand (from a structural point of view)
is to the North. Unfortunately (?) that's where our well is.
Is is practical to put a house over the well? There probably
will not be much of a basement, due to ledge problems. What
kind of access do I need to the well? The well has a
submerged electrical pump, and is over 400' deep.
George
|
58.118 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Mon Jan 12 1987 08:17 | 16 |
| If the well is 400' deep, if (when) the pump dies the repair people
might need some sort of power puller to lift out the pump. 400'
of pipe plus a pump is pretty heavy, even if the pipe is plastic.
In the case of the company I used, they have a rig on the back of
a truck for pulling deep pumps, which would be sort of hard to use
if the well were under a house.
In any case, the pipe sections used for the drop down to the pump
are (probably) 20' long and semi-rigid, so I expect at least 20'
of headroom would be a minimum requirement. I don't think it would
bend enough to clear an 8' ceiling.
It is probably not a practical idea, unfortunately. Call up a pump
company for a better opinion, but I'd say no.
A question: how did you get away with having the well so close to
the house in the first place? Possibly you don't have a septic
system that it needs to be at least 100' away from?
|
58.119 | | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Jan 12 1987 08:43 | 13 |
| re:-2 I'd be surprised if you could get a building permit to build
over your well.
re:-1
> A question: how did you get away with having the well so close to
> the house in the first place? Possibly you don't have a septic
> system that it needs to be at least 100' away from?
Acually, I think its the leach field that needs to be that far away.
Isn't is?
-mark
|
58.120 | All's well... | FURILO::KENT | Peter | Mon Jan 12 1987 09:20 | 3 |
| Just got done applying for building permit (garage) - they want
to make sure that your are NOT building over your well. It may
depend on the town, but it doesn't sound like a good idea anyway.
|
58.121 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Tue Jan 13 1987 09:33 | 4 |
| Yes, the distance of interest is from well to leach field (has to be
more than 100', at least in Mass.). I was assuming that the leach
field was fairly close to the house, probably because mine is, and
therefore the well would have to be far away.
|
58.122 | oh well | DSSDEV::CHALTAS | | Tue Jan 13 1987 12:44 | 4 |
| Well, I thought not. By the way, the well is on the North side
of the house, the leach field and septic are on the south side,
and not real close (70' or so) to the house, so they aren't too
close to the well.
|
58.123 | Historical tangent | ARGUS::CURTIS | Dick 'Aristotle' Curtis | Wed Jan 14 1987 09:25 | 14 |
| FWIW, a historical note:
I'm told that in the North of England, in the border areas, knights
and petty nobles built fortified houses (protection against raids
from the Scots and all that). They usually had a well inside the
house, to make sieges and such more difficult.
Of course, we don't have sieges and border raids to worry about,
and they didn't have building codes...
We return you to your work in progress.
Dick
|
58.124 | Sometimes I think I'd rather have the border raids! | YODA::BARANSKI | Laugh when you feel like Crying! | Wed Jan 14 1987 11:00 | 0 |
58.125 | Ain't dead yet! | VINO::TREMBLAY | | Wed Jan 14 1987 13:26 | 9 |
| ...sounds like stories I've heard about where in the olden days
when the settlers had to fight off the indians....when a member
of their household died, they would bury them in the celler so
the indians would not be aware of their diminished strength to
fight.
...I guess having the well in the house also stopped
them from poisoning it...
|
58.126 | Glowing in the Dark | HERMES::AREY | Proofreader for a Skywriting Company | Thu Jan 15 1987 22:12 | 16 |
| I'm not one to cause alarm, but there's a warning going around
these days about Radon Gas... It's gets into your house by way
of leaks in your basement (up from the dirt) It hasn't been a problem
in years past because houses were so drafty the Radon didn't
accumulate. Today's houses are very air-tight and this radioactive
gas has become a subtle health hazard.
A well in your house would serve as a fine source of Radon gas...
Just think, after a few years you could read in bed at night without
a night light! :-)
Makes me wonder if sump pump holes in your cellar can cause
the same problem? Doesn't some Citizen's group in Massachusetts
have a free Radon detector service?
Don Arey
|
58.142 | Iron in well water | STAR::FARNHAM | I've led a strange life, Mortimer. | Mon Mar 02 1987 13:59 | 17 |
|
I did a quick check of keywords (and the notes on wells), and found
nothing on this, so here goes:
We have a terrible problem with iron in our well water. Not only
do our plumbing fixtures get stained, but much of our light-colored
laundry is gradually turning orange.
We have a whole-house water filter, one of those which takes the
spun-whatever cartridges, but need more. So, what experience do
y'all have with purification systems specifically made to remove iron
from water? Brands, prices, sources, can they be DIY installed (I'm
a reasonably competent plumber), etc., etc...
Stu
|
58.143 | Hey, Culligan Man! | ZENSNI::HOE | | Mon Mar 02 1987 22:47 | 7 |
| Check with the Culligan Man. They will lease, rent or sell you a
unit called a reverse osmosis system that will REDUCE the iron content
but won't say remove all the iron. The best part about leasing or
renting for a year is that if it doesn't work, you're not stuck
with it.
/cal
|
58.144 | you can use a water softener | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Tue Mar 03 1987 00:11 | 18 |
| Hi Stu -
There are various notes in this file concerning water quality
(I've written a few).
To control (almost eliminate) the iron content of my well water,
I use a conventional water softener. Not a reverse osmosis unit,
which would cost far more for whole-house coverage.
A typical water softener would run $400-700 installed, plus
occasional addition of salt for the recharging cycle. Not too cheap.
I believe there are notes in this file that mention units that
you can install yourself (that is, purchase yourself).
Ny unit came from AF Water in Ayre.
__Rich
|
58.145 | | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Mar 03 1987 09:02 | 26 |
| $400-$700? does your do the same mine did? maybe technology has brought the
price down...
when we moved into our last house we had a culligan unit which was about 10
years old. the previous owners left us the original paperwork and thay
had spend over 1K to install it.
As rich said, you periodically add salt. LOTS of it if your unit is old. We're
talking about ordering it by the TON!!! That's right, about 40 50lb bags every
year or so.
With all this, it still wasn't doing such a hot job so we called in the Culligan
man who installed another unit to assist the main one. This thing was over $300
and had to be fed some chemical that ran around $20 a load. The good news was
it reduced out salt intake (the surgeon general would be pleased) to around
3 or 4 bags every couple of months.
The one good thing about water softeners it that whenever you want to make ice
cream, you never have to worry about not having any salt in the house.
Why bother with all this? Besides ruining clothes and scumming up your
dishwasher, all that iron raises hell with the pipes. A neighbor who didn't
want to put in a softener had pipes actually clog up (sort of like hardening
of the arteries!). It's much cheaper to put in the softener..
-mark
|
58.146 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Tue Mar 03 1987 09:39 | 9 |
| "This Old House" had a blurb about an iron filter on a recent show.
It's specifically designed to remove iron. It adds oxygen to the
water through a venturi gizmo, oxidizing the dissolved iron and
precipitating it out in a form that can be caught by the filter.
Once every x number of days the system backwashes the filter. It
looked as though it would be just the thing for dealing with iron.
No salt, no chemicals.
I installed a water softener to deal with the iron in my water,
and it works, but I wish I known about this other system!
|
58.147 | IRON FILTERS | CAD::DEMBA | | Tue Mar 03 1987 10:00 | 35 |
| I am looking into the same problem with our water. We have had our
water analyzed for about 30 various parameters just to be sure of
what other problems might exist.
New technology has changed the method of removing the iron. Some
companies say we didn't need anything special to remove it, and
a water softener would do the job. The bad thing about water softeners
is that they do it through ion exchange process which replaces the
impurity with sodium.
There has been a filter around for a long time called a "manganese
green sand filter" which was made specifically for removal of iron.
However, if the unit is not working properly, it could load your
water up with the manganese. Which isn't great either.
The newest iron filter (which I saw on channel 2's "This Old House")
uses no chemical as such (there is some kind of filter which must
be backwashed occasionally). The unit uses air to precipatate the
iron out of solution. Within the unit there is also a lime filter
to keep the pH neutral.
The cost for our needs is about $800, if I install it myself. This
doesn't include the pipe fittings.
I like it because you are no adding anything to the water, and also
there is no maintenence required by me once the unit is set up.
I have a list of six companies who sell and install the unit that
was on "This Old House". If you are interested send me mail and
I will supply you with the company closest to you.
BTW the unit name is manufactured by AETNA in Greenfield, MA.
tel # 413/773-3683
sd
|
58.148 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Mar 03 1987 11:17 | 3 |
| Check out note 468, it might be a help.
Paul
|
58.149 | SEARS WILL DO TEST, FREE! | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Tue Mar 03 1987 11:21 | 21 |
| I too am looking at that very thing. I went down to the Sears store,
and they offer a FREE test kit. You fill up the bottle, send it
in in the package provided (postage free), and they send you and
the closest Sears store the report.
As for their products, They are ALWAYS having sales on their
water softeners whether they are are marked on the floor as such
or not. They have a model 30,50,70 series that ALSO does IRON.
I am waiting for my report to come back (2-3 weeks) and if I have
0.0 - 5.0 ppm of Iron, their softener is all I need. As it has been
said in the last few responses, their are other types of Iron
removing products, BUT IRON IS NOT ALL THAT CAUSES HARD WATER (I
am told). So I hope to get total treatment INCL IRON for under $500.00!!
(if I install a Sears Model 50 unit which I think is the right one
but I'll know for sure in a couple of weeks).
More after I hear back from Lab
Mark
|
58.150 | I know just what you mean . . . | RSTS32::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Mar 04 1987 16:18 | 39 |
| I had the same problem with my well in Mt Vernon, NH. Had the water tested
after drilling in Sept. '83 and knew the iron was high. Put in an Aqua-pure
iron/rust/dirt cartridge filter and found that mostly I just replaced car-
tridges once a week 'cause they were orange. Same symptoms - orange clothes
and fixtures. (Also tough to cook some things in an appetizing fashion, like
pasta.) We bought bottled water for drinking/cooking for almost two years.
Then last spring I had the water tested again. It was acidic (had been
neutral before) and high in both Ferrous and ferric iron (one's eveidently
the oxidized stuff that the cartridge filter gets and the other is the
unoxidized that stained clothes, etc.) I had the testing done by taking
the sample to a plumbing supply place which sent it to Bruner. Bruner
recommended a two part system - a neutralization filter to raise the pH
and a manganese greensand to oxidize and eliminate the iron. The units
cost me roughly $700 and $900 respectively. I installed them myself in
a weekend, but it does require significant plumbing skills. The greensand
unit has a cycling timer (like a softener) to control regeneration and
backwashing. It does this with KMNO4 (potassium permanganate) which
runs about $5/lb in ten lb bottles, but it only uses a lb every 6 to 8
weeks. I've noticed no manganese in the house water, but you can't draw
when the thing is regen-ing. The neutralizing unit contains marble chips
and supposedly requires a backwashing manually (attaching some drain hoses
and opening/closing different valves and flushing) every so often when
it becomes ineffective. I've done it once since installation but observed
to tangible results. I liked the looks of the system because unlike a
softener it does NOT add anything to the water (like sodium ions).
How did it work? Great for the first three months or so. Noticeable
difference in clothes and fixtures. Then it seemed to slip. Now we're
back to stains again and when you boil water it turns yellow. My guess
is that somehow part of this thing is not functioning, or else our
water has gotten substantially worse (I understand this CAN happen).
I'm having a new sample analyzed and see what Bruner suggests next.
BTW, I saw the system demo-ed on This Old House, also, and thought
highly of it. I'd recommend checking that one out no matter what
you do.
-Jack
|
58.151 | Try Grainger's | DPHILL::HTINK | | Thu Mar 05 1987 17:10 | 6 |
| Grainger's sells a backwash type filter specifically for iron and
sulphur removal for $ 242 - note that it's NOT a water softener.
The unit works by oxidation and removes up to 20 ppm of stuff.
Henk
|
58.152 | Help for stains. | CHAUPS::DIMACK | | Fri Mar 06 1987 17:06 | 18 |
|
I live in Maynard and we have a severe iron problem even though it
is town water. I learned the hard way as to why the clothes, dishes
etc., turn orange/brown. The cause is due to the use of chlorine
bleach. The chlorine causes the iron in the water to oxidize. I
learned this when I put in an above ground pool and got some free
advice, "Just put it up, make sure it's level, fill it up, throw some
HTH in and go swimming.". Two hours after I put in the HTH we had
7600 gallons of 'iced tea'. That's when I got some professional help,
professional pool help, that is. Anyway, that's what is causing the
stains. We use dishwasher detergent that does not have chlorine bleach,
All and Sun Light, are two that I know of, and Vivid for the washing
machine. We haven't any stains.
I know that doesn't take care of the pipes, but I hope it helps.
John Di.
|
58.153 | | STAR::FARNHAM | I've led a strange life, Mortimer. | Wed Mar 11 1987 12:46 | 9 |
|
re: .9 Where's Graingers?
re: .10 I wondered if bleach exacerbated the problem.
Thanks,
Stu
|
58.154 | Grainger locations | DPHILL::HTINK | | Thu Mar 12 1987 14:30 | 12 |
| A few of Grainger's locations:
428 University Ave, Norwood, Mass. 617-762-7375
31 Cabot Road, Woburn, Mass. 617-935-8808
209 Brooks Str., Worcester, Mass. 617-853-7300
370 E. Industrial Park Dr., Manchester, N.H., 603-668-7161
Henk
|
58.155 | PH/Dissolved solids (as CaCO3) my problem | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Mon Mar 16 1987 17:07 | 14 |
| Well, my report is back. My water had NO IRON (0.0), Low Hardness
(2.2 grains per gallon gpg) but did have a low PH (6.6) and high
disolved solids. I am told a water softener is NOW for me.
Anyone have suggestions? I would like to find a 'less than premium
priced' showroom where knowlegable people work that would allow
me to buy the unit (what ever it is) and install it myself. They
all semm to be very leary of homeowner's abilities and hence charge
an arm and a leg for a simple installation.
Any suggestions?
mark
|
58.569 | What is the min recommended gal/min for a well? | BCSE::FIORE | | Mon Apr 06 1987 14:15 | 15 |
| I've read through the other notes on drilling/pounding wells etc.
but am curious if anyone knows what the minimum recommended gallons/minute
are for a drilled well. This would appear to depend on the depth of the
well and state/town minimum requirements for one; and the amount
of water your household would need. I recall reading (not here)
that an adult uses between 40-70 gallons of water per day. Some
notes (re:58) comment that 1 gallon/minute was not enough to satisfy
that persons needs.
The well I currently own supplies 3.5 gallons/minute which has been
fine. I am now in the process of buying a new home with a well
which is delivering considerable less.
Thanks,
Tony
|
58.570 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Tue Apr 07 1987 07:58 | 18 |
| I think recommended is around 4-5, minimum, but I'm probably wrong.
What you actually NEED depends on two main things: your lifestyle,
and how much storage capacity your well has. If you're into one-hour
showers with a massage shower head while doing 6 loads of laundry
and watering the lawn, you'll need a lot. However, if you are less
extravagent, spread your water use out over a period of time, and
have good storage capacity in your well, you can get by with a lot
less. "Storage capacity" in a well, by the way, is just the volume of
water in the well above the level of the pump. Typically a well
driller will go some distance below where water first starts coming
into the well, to provide a storage area. In addition, water will
frequently rise in a well above the level where it comes in. If
a well has sufficient storage capacity, conceivably you could get
by with a very low flow rate, if enough water came in during the
night to meet your needs during the day.
But to answer the original question: I'd guess 4-5 gpm minimum.
|
58.571 | Check your bank's requirement | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Tue Apr 07 1987 09:25 | 23 |
| Life style does have a lot to do with it but the bottom line is
usually what the bank requires. Most banks use the FHA "standard"
of 4 or 5 gallons a minute, but it's figured as 4 or 5 gallons a
minute for four hours. So the FHA requires 4x60x4 or 960 gallons
in four hours.
Let's figure my wells capacity:
My well is 525 feet deep, the pump is near the bottom, the static water
level is about 15 feet from the top. So when full, I have about 500
feet of storage in a 6" hole which is 500 x 1.5 (1.5 gallons per foot
in a 6" hole) or 750 gallons of storage. The water fills the hole at
about 1.5 gallons a minute (according to the well driller) so during
four hours I get an additional 1.5x60x4 or 360 gallons. Add that to the
storage of 750 yields 1110 gallons in fours hours which is above the
FHA standard of 960 gallons in four hours.
Personally, since it was a marginal well as far a water rate goes, I
think the well driller stated the water filling rate at 1.5
gallons/minute knowing that the numbers would work for the FHA
requirement.
Charly
|
58.572 | Keeping my fingers crossed | BCSE::FIORE | | Tue Apr 07 1987 11:26 | 9 |
| Thanks, now I can compare my current home water capacity to the
new house. If the new well exceeds or equals the new house I will
feel relieved. The new well is deep (700') but the rate is still
being determined. It will most likely be between .5 gal per minute
to 2 gal per minute. The low rate had me concerned. The builder
needs at least a .5 gal per minute rate to meet the minimum town
requirements for an occupancy certificate.
Tony
|
58.573 | hydro-fracting? | NOVA::BWRIGHT | | Wed Apr 08 1987 10:50 | 22 |
| re:.3
Another member of the 700-plus foot well club! Mine is 705'. Maybe
another few feet...
I was under the impression that 3 gal/min is the minimum rate w/o
worrying temporarily running dry. Of course, as stated in earlier
replies, lifestyle does have a lot to with it. However, it would
be nice to water your lawn occasionally...
Have you thought about hydro-fracting to try and increase you water
rate? There is some discussion on this elsewhere in this conference,
I believe. Essentially, hydro-fracting tries to open up smaller
veins of water that might have be clogged during the drilling process.
I've heard of forcing compressed air down the well to "blow open"
these cracks. I know someone whose well went from ~1 gal/min to
6 gal/min after this. There may also be another method where dynamite
is lowered into your well in an effort to "stir things up."
Good luck!
Bill
|
58.574 | Water water every where except my well | BCSE::FIORE | | Wed Apr 08 1987 14:28 | 14 |
| re:.4
Yes, as we speak something of that sort is going on at the new well.
My builder was going to keep drilling, but has changed his mind
and got rid of the well driller and hired somebody to "Hydro Blast"
as he called it. I think he ment Hydro Fracture. I'm not too greedy,
2 gal/min would be acceptable.
I will let you know how it turns out. After reading the Well notes
I feel optomistic.
Thanks
Tony
|
58.575 | I guess I got enough water, thanks | BCSE::FIORE | | Mon Apr 13 1987 15:57 | 16 |
| The Hydro fracting machine was able to get the water rate up to
1.5 gal/min. It originally started out at 1 gal/min and by the
time it was tested was down to 1/2 pint/min. The static water level
is 15' from the top of the well which gives me at least 600' to 650' of
water. All that adds up to 900 gals + 360gals/4hours or 1260 gallons
of water available
every 4 hours. I was hoping for a 2 or 3 gallon per minute fill
rate.
Knowing that some of you are getting along on 1.5 gallons/minute
is helpful. The hydro fracting guy said that I should not have
a water shortage problem, and guarantees that rate for a year.
Thanks again for your advice,
Tony
|
58.587 | Fertilizing near a well? | MKFSA::STEVENS | | Thu Apr 16 1987 20:21 | 8 |
| Spring has sprung and it's time to get out the rakes and lawn mowers
and fertilizer. I have a question on fertilizer's with insecticide
mixed in. I was wondering if it's ok to use this fertilizer near
a 20 ft. surface well. I have a nice colony of ants I'd like to
dispose of but at the same time I don't want to dispose of my
drinking water or anyone that drinks it. Any ideas?
dave
|
58.588 | why bother? | VICKI::ESONIS | What now? | Fri Apr 17 1987 07:41 | 4 |
|
forget the fertilizer! spend your money on a hammock, which you
will be able to use more frequently if your lawn doesn't grow as
fast!
|
58.589 | Be Cautious! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Fri Apr 17 1987 09:40 | 11 |
| I'd be somewhat cautious about doing this broad cast type of
application near a dug well. When doing the same near a public well
an applicator must stay either 250' or 400' away depending on whether
it is a gravel pacyed well or not. On private wells I'd stay at
least the normal distances that what apply to pollution control
of a well from a leach field/septic tank situation, usually 100'/75'.
I'd advise against the broadcast type of application. If you must
treat for ant control, try and spot treat with a portable sprayer.
This method will substantially reduce the amount of total chemical
being applied to the adjacent areas.
|
58.590 | | TOPCAT::ALLEN | | Fri Apr 17 1987 09:52 | 8 |
| If you like to mow your lawn more often then apply in the spring,
otherwise take a tip from pro landscapers and do it right before the
dry season. I know this is contrary to what the companies say, they
would really like to see you apply twice a year to increase their
sales. BTW, a reason given for fall application is often to build up
roots. Nitrogen is the primary ingredient of most lawn fertilizer
and potassium is what builds roots, nitrogen makes leaves (blades
in this case).
|
58.591 | explain "dry" season pls | TOMCAT::FOX | | Fri Apr 17 1987 13:25 | 4 |
| re .3
When you say "right before the dry season", do you mean mid-late
June? I would think that would cause a lawn to burn. Spring and
Fall feedings are what I've always heard.
|
58.156 | Just installed a softener... | BOGART::VELTEN | | Fri Apr 17 1987 17:53 | 32 |
|
I just installed a softener myself that I bought from AF Water in
Ayer. They suggested I could install it myself and were very helpful.
I bought the smallest capacity unit which cost me about $480. Their
installation charge is $130, but for $70 they sold me the bypass
valve setup (two ball valves and a globe valve plus couplings) and
set it up for installation. You have to supply a 110 outlet and
a drain. They also explained to me the tricks they use in installing
the unit in the supply line, consisting of a handful of elbows and
street ells. You cut a short section out of the line and insert
the unit. The only thing slightly tricky is using the low-lead
(95/5) solder required in Massachusetts, which doesn't flow very
well. You need a torch with a turbo tip that can generate 3000F.
For the record, I, too, thought I had an iron problem. Reddish
brown deposits in the toilet bowls, the dishwasher stained brown.
Lately, I started getting what looked like sand in the bathtubs,
and the stuff was plugging up the aerators and the filter screen
in the washer. A prior water test, plus the free testing done by
AF, showed no iron or manganese in the water. The people at AF
asked questions which made me realize the sand was coming from the
hot water line (only the hot water filter in the washer was plugging).
The diagnosis was hard water (6 grains) and HIGH Ph. For some reason,
the high Ph causes precipitation of minerals when the water was
heated. The long term effect: plugged heater loop and boiler tubes.
The water softener takes care of the hardness and can also remove
up to 2 ppm of iron. I'm hoping this will cure both of my complaints.
I'm still cleaning out the toilet flush tanks with Iron Out, so
it's still too early to tell.
--dave
|
58.592 | TOLL FREE NUMBER | MKFSA::STEVENS | | Fri Apr 17 1987 18:54 | 12 |
| Thanks for all the info and suggestions folks. Esspecially you,
Steve, the only thing you left out was the beer that goes along
with the hamock. Anyway I've got a good tip for everyone with
questions on fertilizer. Scott company has a toll free
number specifically set up to answer questions their customers
may have on the use of their products. I got the number from a
salesman at service star hardware store. (1-800-543-turf).
I'm going to give them a call and see what they have to say.
I'll let you know if they say anything worthwhile. bye for now,
Dave
|
58.594 | Working on the line to the well | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Apr 21 1987 15:26 | 14 |
| I need to temporarily disconnect my well as I'm having a foundation put across
the current line. I've already found someone who will come out, disconnect it,
temporarily reconnect it and once the foundation is in, permanently connect it
for a few hundred bucks.
However, I've been thinking about it and wonder if it's really necessary to get
someone in at all! After all, all that comes out of the well is a power line
and a hose. One would think a simply splice would do the trick.
Has anyone had any experience with well, pumps, etc? Is it much of a job? I
wouldn't mind blowing 1/2 day or so if it will save me the money. However, I
wouldn't want to have to spend a whole weekend on it.
-mark
|
58.157 | IRON OUT? | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Tue Apr 21 1987 16:18 | 5 |
| Cleaning with IRON OUT? What is IRON OUT and where can I get some?
I assume it is a powder that removes iron stains?
mark
|
58.595 | A word of caution. | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | | Wed Apr 22 1987 00:23 | 14 |
| It dosent sound that hard if you feel like you can do it give it
a try.
Be sure to pull the breaker when working with the power.
If the pump for the well is in a pit be very careful as they often
have oxygen displacing gasses in them. My cousin died two years
ago in a well pit. Seems there was a large amount of co2 built up
there. He was working alone and dident have anyone around to notice
he was in trouble.
So be careful.
-j
|
58.596 | | MILT::JACKSON | when the tough get going, the weak get screwed | Wed Apr 22 1987 11:00 | 16 |
| I've done it.
At my fathers house, we moved the pipes around when putting in the
french drain. Make sure that you use UF wire, and splice in what
you need.
You can either replace the whole mess from the well cap, or splice
in. The pipe is usually (if it's a newer installation) plastic
so all you need is some STAINLESS STEEL hose clamps and a couple
of couplings. (you need more if it's a shallow well with a pump
in the house and not a submersible pump)
-bill
|
58.597 | well... | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Apr 22 1987 13:17 | 22 |
| Sounds reasonable...
I'm assuming that if I cut the pipe where it enters the house, I'll be able
to reuse it since I'll be effectively moving the pressure tank 12 feet closer
to the well.
What I'm really interested in is what to do as a temporary measure while digging
the cellar hole and waiting for the concrete to harden. When I had called a
well person he had said he would run a temporary electrical cable and hose from
the well head to the pressure tank. What I'm wondering is are these normally
spliced at the well head and therefore can I easily put in my own bypass? If
so, I assume I'd have to buy around 100' of plastic hose (sounds like big
bucks). Any alternatives? I might be able to use garden hose, but wouldn't
that leave my water tasting like crap for a whole month?
If I pop off the cap on the well head, what exactly will I see?
What if I simply let the backhoe dig up the pipe and assume I'll be able to
splice in a small piece where the break is. This could be risky if the pipe
breaks in the wrong place.
-mark
|
58.598 | | BARNUM::DVORAK | | Wed Apr 22 1987 17:43 | 3 |
| I bought 100 ft. of 1/2 inch plastic hose (stiff black stuff) at
Spags last night for $8.99.
|
58.599 | | MILT::JACKSON | when the tough get going, the weak get screwed | Thu Apr 23 1987 08:41 | 32 |
| What I'd do is this:
Buy enough of the flexible plastic pipe to do the job and then add
a few feet. When you first break ground, where the pipe will be
exposed, I'd dig back a few feet on both sides (if you can) and
then splice in the new pipe. Then dig up the well head and run
a temporary wire from the house out to the well. At some point
you're going to need to deal with the real wire, but you may be
able to do a splice. (I don't know about that one, being that
it's under ground,etc. BUT It must be done, cause people dig up
the well wire/pipe all the time with backhoes)
The well head is usually just a flat piece of metal that seals the
top of the well casing. It has a fitting for the water supply pipe
and a connection for wire. (this is for a submersible pump system,
shallow wells differ slightly) The pipe/wires inside the wells
connect to the inside of the cap, the pipe/wires outside connect
on the outside. It really isn't all that complicated. The worst
part is finding the damned thing. Some houses haven't marked where
the well is, and if you can't find the person who installed it (or
they can't remember) you're in for a search. (of course the easiest
way is to dig up the complete pipe from the house, at which point
your splice ends up being a complete pipe replacement)
I don't think the flexible plastic pipe is all that expensive.
Check around, you might be able to get a good deal.
-bill
|
58.158 | TANG to the rescue (again...) | CHAPLN::ROSENTHAL | Out to break Murphy's Law! | Thu Apr 23 1987 09:49 | 17 |
|
As I mentioned somewhere else in this file, using IRON OUT
or any of those horrendous caustic chemicals isn't entirely
necessary.
I removed stubborn iron stains from the toilet bowls/tanks
and the inside of my dishwasher (it looked as if someone
had run the dishwasher while an open can of brown paint was
inside!) WITH TANG INSTANT BREAKFAST DRINK.
This is not a joke. Invest in a jar of TANG, dump it into
the toilet and let it sit for a while. Then flush a few
times. You'll notice a big difference! It only took 2
cycles on my dishwasher to get the baked-in brown goop out
of my dishwasher. My dishwasher went from brand new lily-
pure white to barfo brown in less than a year. But I fixed
that!
|
58.159 | P.S. | CHAPLN::ROSENTHAL | Out to break Murphy's Law! | Thu Apr 23 1987 09:49 | 3 |
|
I also wouldn't drink TANG now if my life depended on it...
|
58.600 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | | Thu Apr 23 1987 20:43 | 11 |
| I wouldent suggest trying to make the splice underground. It will
be close to impossible to get a good connections and then seal it.
You would have to use one of the epoxy sealers designed for the
purpose. 3m makes them and they are sold only thru wholesale
as far as I know. The best choice would be to run a new wire to
the pump along the new route and do the job in one shot.
You wouldent want to leave the wire where it is anyway by the sound
of things..
-j
|
58.601 | | 25813::WELLCOME | Steve | Fri Apr 24 1987 11:47 | 16 |
| The pipe should be no problem, assuming it's plastic. Decide where
you want it cut (DON'T just let the backhoe tear it up!!!), and
you can splice in a new piece easily with a connector and ALL
STAINLESS STEEL INCLUDING THE SCREWS hose clamps.
The wire is a bit more of a pain. They use a special goop to
waterproof the splices (at least the people who installed my pump
did) and I don't know if you could get a truly waterproof joint
any other way. If all you want to do is the temporary hookup you
can probably get buy with rubber tape (not plastic, the gooey rubber
stuff), but if you're talking about burying a splice for 10 or 15
years, I've got doubts. The wire may run inside its own plastic
pipe from the well. If so, can you disconnect the wire inside the
house, cut the pipe the wire is in (but not the wire) outside the
house, then pull the wire out? Later on you can splice that pipe
the same as you do the water pipe, and put the wire back.
|
58.160 | | 25813::WELLCOME | Steve | Fri Apr 24 1987 11:52 | 2 |
| You can get Iron Out at Spag's (of course....)
|
58.602 | | MILT::JACKSON | when the tough get going, the weak get screwed | Fri Apr 24 1987 13:40 | 7 |
| I doubt that the wire will be in a seperate pipe. Most of the well
installations that I've seen have the wire taped to the water pipe
about every foot or so. I think that's just to keep it in place
while it's being burried.
-bill
|
58.603 | doesn't sound too bad | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Apr 24 1987 13:45 | 19 |
| Sounds like it won't be all that bad. As it stands, the situtation is this:
| |
|
| |
tank |-X------------------------------------------------well
| |
|
| |
current new
wall wall
It sounds like I should be able to cut the wire/pipe at location "X", pour my
new foundation and have enough left over so I won't need a splice. Sounds like
I should probably get around 20-30 feet of pipe so I can temporarily route it
around the forms and then throw it away when ready for the permanent connection.
-mark
|
58.161 | Iron Out | BOGART::VELTEN | | Fri Apr 24 1987 16:26 | 12 |
| Iron Out is a cleaner for water softeners. It or another brand
should be available in the plumbing section of most hardware stores.
I got mine at Robinsons in Hudson MA. The box says it can be used
to clean porcelain and fiberglass surfaces. So far I have done
the toilet flush tanks and the dishwasher. The inside of the
dishwasheris now a sparkling white instead of brown-black. The
stuff contains bisulphites so you will notice a slight rotten-egg
odor while it is working, but that goes away with a flush or two.
-dave
|
58.162 | The fix for the malfunctioning oxidizer | RSTS32::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Fri May 15 1987 13:04 | 14 |
| re: .8
I determined that the chemical injection portion of the regen cycle
on my conditioning filter was not sucking any KMnO4 solution from
the regen tank into the greensand to replenish the oxidizing capacity.
With the help of the serviceman I found that the venturi in the
valve body was clogged. Cleaned it out with some fine wire and
reinstalled it and it is now working like a charm. Previously, a
cup of tap water when boiled in the uwave would tune yellow-to-orange.
Immediately after a single cycle once the rgenerant had been circulated
I was able to obtain a cup of boiled, crystal clear water.
Problem solved!
-Jack
|
58.593 | boric acid for ants | SVCRUS::KROLL | | Fri May 29 1987 23:40 | 3 |
| put boric acid on the ant pile and they will leave. Don't know
what it will do for the water but its got to be better than an insect
spray.
|
58.606 | Hydro Fracture For Artesian Well | TOPDOC::JAMES | | Wed Jun 17 1987 09:09 | 12 |
| Does anybody have experiences to share about hydro fracture for
an artesian well? My friend has an artesian well with 1 quart of
water per minute. The well is 800 feet deep.
Needless to say, she runs out of water very quickly. One wash per
day can do it. Is it worth the $2000 someone has quoted? Any other
people in the same (dry) boat?
Thanks for any info,
Stel
|
58.607 | DIR/KEY=WELLS | POP::SUNG | Dept. of Redundancy Dept. | Wed Jun 17 1987 13:51 | 3 |
| See notes 58, 439, 512 and 1049.
-al
|
58.439 | ?Looking for well pump info. | USWAV1::LASHER | Ben Lasher Boston Software Services | Wed Jun 17 1987 15:35 | 28 |
| I am looking to purchase a pump so that I can use water in a
well that is under my house. I have a pipe in the cellar which
is the access to the well. The bottom of the well is about 13 feet
down, and the water seems to be about 6 feet deep. I would ideally
like to be able to pump the water up to a maximum of around 70 to
100 feet with enough pressure to run a sprinkler, wash cars, etc.
I live in Dedham, where for the past 5 or 6 years, there has
been a water ban due during the summer months. (No outside watering
at all, or possibly on evry other day). Besides that, with increased
lawn/gardening activity, my water bills are starting to hit the
$75 range for 3 months (not alot maybe, but I just hate to pay water
bills).
I shopped around briefly 3 years ago when I bought the house,
but stopped when I got the idea that it was going to be around $300.
Any idea what I should be looking for as far as features,
manufacturers, price range? Anyone know a good place to shop around
in the Dedham area (or South Shore/Boston area). I would love to
be able to pump water all day on lawns and gardens, keeping evrything
green. (Of course then my electric bill goes up, right.) Which
reminds me, would such a pump make a noticeable difference in an
electric bill if used frequently?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Ben
|
58.440 | Noooooooooo problem | DRUID::CHACE | | Wed Jun 17 1987 16:54 | 10 |
| The horizontal distance you wish to run the water doesn't really
make any difference (within reason). The difference is in the height
the pump must lift the water. From the sound of it all you need
is the cheapest system. A straight lift-type pump and some kind
of storage tank. The tank would not have to be big for your use.
Try looking in the Sears catalog for ideas. They have many types
of pumps and have specs. ect that should help you decide what you
need.
Kenny
|
58.608 | hydro Frac | EXODUS::MOLLICA | | Thu Jun 18 1987 09:30 | 0 |
58.441 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Jun 18 1987 10:16 | 5 |
| If the water is only 13' down, you can use a shallow well pump.
As suggested in .1, you can probably get by with the cheapest
system you can find. (Of course, you want one good enough so it's
not breaking down all the time.)
A good brand is Gould. They sell all kinds of well pumps.
|
58.442 | not all day | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Thu Jun 18 1987 13:58 | 5 |
| I don't think you can expect to water grass/lawn/cars all day.
The dug(shallow) well on our property was once the only water supply
for the house. It runs dry after 1 1/2 - 2 hours. I don't know what
the recovery time is for the well.
|
58.611 | Activating well unused for 3 years | USWAV1::LASHER | Ben Lasher Boston Software Services | Wed Jun 24 1987 13:34 | 23 |
| I have a shallow well with an access in my cellar through a
2" pipe which protrudes about 2 feet above the cellar floor. The
water level is about 10' below the cellar floor and the water appears
to be about 6' deep. I bought the house 3 years ago and have not
done anything with the well, since we have town water. The previous
owners had a pump which they used for watering lawns, washing cars,
etc.
I purchased a small utility pump to do the same thing, water
grass, wash cars, etc. My problem is that after about 10 to 15
seconds, the pump sucks air. I imagine the water level (either
in the pipe or well, or whatever is down the pipe) immediately drops
and does not replenish itself fast enough to keep pace with the
pump. My guess is that after 3 years of no use, that the source
of water to my pipe access is clogged or something.
Any idea if there is some kind of regular maintenance which
needs to be performed on a well like this to keep the water flowing.
Do I need to call someone to have it reemed? If so, any suggestions
in the Boston, South Shore area....can I do it myself with a snake,
could it have run dry on me, etc., etc., etc?
Ben
|
58.612 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Wed Jun 24 1987 14:08 | 22 |
| You may have a bad foot valve that isn't letting water through,
except slowly. They usually stick open, but yours may be stuck
shut. The foot valve (assuming you have one) will be at the
bottom of the pipe coming up out of the well. Pull the pipe up
and investigate. (by-the-way, the purpose of the foot valve is
to maintain water in the pipe, so the pump doesn't lose its prime
when it's shut off.)
It may be easier to just put in a new piece of pipe. Measure the
depth of the water in the well, and try to arrange things so the
bottom end of the pipe is about a foot above the bottom of the well,
so it doesn't pick up muck and crud. For your situation, if the
pump you have is self-priming and can self-prime with a 10' lift,
you won't even need a foot valve.
There is nothing complicated about a shallow well or its plumbing.
The well is a hole filled with water and the plumbing is a pipe
hanging down into the water. Unless the pipe is blocked or a lot
of crud has fallen into the well and filled it up you shouldn't
have to do any maintenance.
One possibility: be SURE you don't have an air leak in the line
from the well to the pump. Even a small leak can cause all kinds
of grief in getting the pump to work properly.
|
58.613 | ledge maybe? | FROST::WILLIAMS | | Wed Jun 24 1987 14:38 | 13 |
|
Is it possible that there is a rock ledge under your house?
When I was a kid, my folks moved out of their house for two
months while we stayed at a summer camp they had. With no
water being pumped through the well, there was a shifting in
the ledge that the piping was drilled through and the water
supply was cut off.
Hope that's not the case.
Shane
|
58.614 | pipe set in concrete | USWAV1::LASHER | Ben Lasher Boston Software Services | Wed Jun 24 1987 16:48 | 17 |
| When I was first having the trouble, I pulled the pump out (self
priming, good for 20' down) and tested it in a pail and a cooler.
The lines are tight and the pump works great.
As far as a foot valve, I would guess that I don't have one,
however, if I do, and it is stuck almost closed, that would cause
my symptoms. The pump extracts about as much water as you would
figure to be in 6' of 2" pipe and then sucks air. If you shut if
off and wait awhile, it will do the same thing.
Pulling the pipe is probably the first thing I have to do.
Unfortunately, the pipe is anchored in my concrete cellar floor.
Is there anything I can try before I pull the pipe (hacking up
the floor, indulging in what sounds like at least a full day project)?
Ben
|
58.615 | Attack the problem from the other end? | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Wed Jun 24 1987 18:17 | 14 |
| It is unclear to me whether the well can be accessed (i.e. the well
is in the open) or whether the well is *really* underneath the cellar
floor. If the latter I can't help.
Our stone dug-well is about 15 feet from the house. There are about
two feet of well above the ground and a stone-cemented well cover.
There is a hose that runs from the pump in the cellar,through the
foundation (several feet under ground),comes out into the well
horizontally and makes a vertical drop down into the bottom of
the well. The foot valve -along with some screening to prevent muck
and stones etc- is attached to the bottom of the hose a foot or so
above the bottom of the well. In such a situation accessing the\
foot valve is easy. Just take the top off of the well, pull up
the hose and replace the foot valve drop it back in the well and
you are in business.
|
58.616 | Possible hole in pipe | MAY11::WARCHOL | | Wed Jun 24 1987 22:15 | 15 |
|
It may be that you have a hole in the pipe somewhere below the normal
resting water level. As you pump out the water you drop the level
in the pipe and the level in the well. The well level when pumping
will probably fall exactly to bottom of the hole in the side of
the pipe.
If the pipe is steel or even copper the hole could have developed
due to corrosion at some previous resting water level that may have
been below the current resting level.
Find a way to pull up the pipe or try getting a temporary hose down
to test it out.
Nick
|
58.617 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Jun 25 1987 10:41 | 3 |
| The easiest thing may be to forget about the pipe altogether and
just drop a short length of garden hose down the well when you want
to pump water.
|
58.618 | Found the guy who built it. | USWAV1::LASHER | Ben Lasher Boston Software Services | Thu Jun 25 1987 13:10 | 17 |
| I just so happens that I have a neighbor who supposedly help
the previous owner of my house set up this well. I don't know if
that means that he dug the well, or just put the pipe in. I think
my best next move would be to talk to him and find out just exactly
what the setup is. Where is the well, where does the pipe go, is
there any access to my well other than the pipe, etc.
The only thing I see in my yard is about a 1' diameter opening
in my back yard with a cover on it. The cover is only 5" or 6"
above the ground. To the best of my knowledge, that is only a
vent for the water drains coming out of my house. However, it may turn
out to be more than meets the eye.
Thanks for all the help. I'll return to this note after I talk
to my neighbor who built this thing.
Ben
|
58.620 | How is your WELL doing? | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Jul 01 1987 11:56 | 17 |
| I've been in my new home for about 10 months and I was wondering
how other peoples well are doing? My well , when installed last
May, is a low production well - 2 3/4 gals per minute. This past
weekend I ran out of water while running the garden hose for about
15 minutes. My well is 382' deep and had a static level of 6' below
groundlevel when installed. I recently remeasured the static level
and it has dropped to about 75'. I'm sure the weather has contributed
to the lowering of the static level but what I'm wondering is....
is this a bad, good, normal year as wells go? If its a normal year
I can expect to have to conserve each year in the future and may
investigate using alternative supplies of water for gardens, car
washing etc.,. If it's a bad (dry well year) maybe I can tolerate
the situation this year expecting it will likely improve in the
future. Well how is your well doing?
Thanks in advance!
|
58.621 | How dry I am... | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Wed Jul 01 1987 12:33 | 20 |
| I too have a low production well, 6 years old, 525 feet, 1 to 1 1/2
gallons/minute, static level is probably 50 to 100 feet. No problems
for the first 4 years. Last year, Memorial day weekend and this year
(same weekend!) we ran out. Both cases were surprising in that we
hadn't been using more water than we normally do.
So maybe we have come upon a couple of "dry" years as far a "deep"
wells go. My well driller was telling me that, the type of year we are
currently having doesn't have an immediate effect on deep wells but
rather the previous 5-10. It takes that long, or longer, for the
ground water to work it ways down into the deep rock. He also told
me that my well water probably fell on the side of Mt. Wachusett
several years back. I live about 10-15 miles south east of there.
By the way, I have since hook up to town water and now have the luxury
of clean well water from my kitchen sink and icecube maker and town
water for everything else. I also have a couple of valves that I can
turn and use all water or all town water.
Charly
|
58.622 | What does town think about private water source? | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Wed Jul 01 1987 13:39 | 16 |
| re .-1
The comment in the last note about two water sources reminded me
of a comment the Board of Health officer in our town (Acton Ma.)
made about my water supply. Bottom line, our private well must
be *completely* isolated from the town water supply.! The town must
rigorously monitor the quality of the water that is sent out into the
town pipes. If a private well of unknown purity were capable of sending
water into the town piping system, that could contaminate the town
water.
Is your well water isolated from the town pipes? I think that means
can your kitchen and ice maker *only* get water from the well? and
there is no way to get kitchen water from the town?
Maybe laws are different in your town?
curious
herb
|
58.623 | | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Wed Jul 01 1987 15:22 | 21 |
| I hear what you're saying and agree. My well is piped to the cold water
side of the kitchen sink (ice maker taps into that). The town water
system is piped to the hot water heater and all of the other cold water
faucets.
The two systems are seperate except for an "interconnect valve" between
the two that is normally closed. I can shut off the feed from either
the well or the town system and open the "interconnect valve" to supply
all fixtures from one source.
As added saftey features, the well has ckeck valves to prevent
backflow, the town water goes through a pressure reducer which also
functions as a check valve, and the town water is over 100 psi
compared to the well's 20-40 psi.
By-the-way, the town water dept was there yesterday to hook up the
permanent water meter. They saw my piping system and commented,
"Oh, so you have two water systems now..., With the pressure we're
pumping down here, there won't be any problem with this".
Charly
|
58.609 | | MKTGSG::PETITO | | Thu Jul 02 1987 12:03 | 12 |
| I was looking into Hydrofracting once, and as I understood it, you
usually get a guarantee from the contractor that if it (fracting)
doesn't increase water yield to an agreed upon amount, there is
no fee. Last I heard average fee was about $1300. I have heard of
instances where it worked great, had no effect, and even one where
it closed off the existing water passages to where the well was
rendered useless. It's a crap shoot. I believe most times, though,
it works quite well (no pun intend). This 800' well you mention
must have a very low static level. Normally, such a deep shaft will
store over 800 gallons of water if the level was up to 50' or so.
With that much storage 1/4 gal/min would be adequate, since the
well could recharge at night.
|
58.624 | Air leak in shallow well suction line | VIDEO::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Tue Jul 07 1987 13:57 | 45 |
| This topic does not seem to have been broached yet...
I have a shallow well and a single pipe pump system, a Goulds 1/3 HP with
a preesure tank with a seperate air bladder in the tank. I installed this
myself several years ago to replace a failing brand-x pump.
However, I could never get the air leaks out of the suction line. There is
still a little bit of air coming in with the water. I even replaced
the pipe (1-1/4 inch plastic) and ran it above ground to check for leaks.
An air leak would presumably be a much slower water leak when the pump is not
running and the suction line is under pressure. No leaks.
Well, I gave up and resigned to having slightly less pressure (since even
the smallest amount of air reduces the capacity of the pump). Also, since
the pressure tank isolates the air and water, the air gets into the water
system and results in an occaisional burp.
Other info: There are several connections, with stainless hose clamps,
all are as tight as can be. The lift from the water level to the pump is
about 20 feet. The foot valve is submerged in several feet of water even
in the dry spells (about 200 gallons worth).
1) Does anyone have any ideas on how to locate an air leak?
2) Is it possible there is no leak, but that the air is being sucked out of
the water?
3) My possible solutions I've considered are:
1. Replace the pipe *again*. Not unless someone can assure me that
the pipe is leaking.
2. Take apart the connections and seal them with some yet-to-be-determined
substance.
3. Call in a professional who will charge me $$$ but fix the problem.
4. Trade in the single suction pipe for a two-pipe system (my pump is
adaptable for that). Such a system is less prone to air leaks since
the outer pipe is always under pressure to drive the jet. Again, I
would not consider this unless I was convinced it would solve the
problem.
Any suggestions? Does anyone else have a single-pipe shallow well pump?
--tom
|
58.625 | Could be a defective pump seal. | HAZEL::THOMAS | | Tue Jul 07 1987 14:11 | 0 |
58.626 | what type pump? | DOBRO::SIMON | Blown away in the country...Vermont | Tue Jul 07 1987 16:57 | 6 |
| Is it a jet pump or a deep well pump? I was having problems
with my shallow well and replaced the jet pump with a Gould
deep well pump. What a difference...
-gary
|
58.627 | Ughh | VLNVAX::SUMNER | Yes dear... put it on my list. | Wed Jul 08 1987 20:17 | 13 |
|
I had a similar problem several years ago and your story
sounds like a repeat of what I did. My problem turned out to
be one of the pipe connections between the pump and the well
that would only leak when the pump was on. If you are only
getting small air bubbles and it makes no difference how long
the pump has been idle then you may have the same problem. Try
sealing up all of your connections with a chalking compound
that is safe for use with drinking water. If you go crazy and
glue all your connections and that doesn't work then you will
have more problems trying to un-glue the connections.
Glenn
|
58.628 | keep 'em coming... | VIDEO::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Fri Jul 10 1987 14:04 | 28 |
| Re: .1: May be a leaking pump seal.
How do I tell? Is there any way to check out the seal?
Re: .2: Try a jet pump.
Thanks for the recommendation. Yes, mine is the single-pipe shallow
well type pump. I can buy the jet pump adapter for it and have
it installed; at less than 20 feet it wasn't supposed to be needed.
But with your success story, I would probably consider it!
Re: .3: Glue.
I agree. Ughh! And it sounds like a not-guaranteed solution.
Does anybody have any ideas on how to locate *where* the air is
entering? If I knew that, I could make a better idea of what to
do.
Thanks for the suggestions...
--tom
|
58.610 | frac it | OGOMTS::GALUSHA | | Tue Jul 21 1987 17:28 | 6 |
| this is kind of a late input, but i recently (end of june) had mine
done. there were no guarantees, and the cost was $900. i ended
up wiht about 3 gasl/min, so it was worth it. a neighbor also took
a gamble, nd doubled his output. i used skillings of chelmsford.
its worth the gamble when you consider the cost of a new well.
|
58.629 | How does a well work? | CELICA::WELLS | | Wed Aug 05 1987 17:18 | 22 |
| Just moved into a home which has well water. I have never
had a well before and I am curious as to how it works. The
realtors explanation was somewhat lacking. My questions
concern not how the water reaches the house, (the pump part
I understand) but how does the water get to the well itself.
Since all of the houses in the area have well water, are we
all pumping from the same source? How does the water keep
flowing into the well and what makes the well occassionally
run dry? I would appreciate any comments you may have since
I know so very little about this subject.
P.S. If this topic is covered in any previous note, please
point me to it.
Thanks,
|
58.630 | | MILT::JACKSON | Bill Jackson DOESN'T take American Express | Thu Aug 06 1987 08:11 | 24 |
| What an appropriate name!
A well is just a hole drilled in the ground. There's usually a
piece of pipe pushed down for the first 'n' feet to keep the topsoil
and other ground from falling into the well. It also keeps groundwater
(which could be contaiminated) from getting in. When the well is drilled
(or hammered) the driller allows for a certain number of feet of
water in reserve in the well. (for instance, say your well is 100
feed deep, you may have 30 feet of water in the well)
then, they pump the well dry and see how long it takes for the well
to recover. If it doesn't recover at least 1 galon per minute,
they will drill deeper to allow for more recovery (as well as more
reserve)
The water comes from the water table. The amount of water your
well can produce (recovery) is dependent on the amount of water
in the ground and the surface area of the hole in the ground. This
is why a deeper well (with the same water source) can recover faster.
|
58.631 | Where it comes from | VIDEO::GOODRICH | Gerry Goodrich | Thu Aug 06 1987 10:15 | 24 |
|
Just a few more notes,
The water gets into your well from an underwater reserve and
passes through cracks in rocks or porous material. You do share
this water reserve with others, this is a good reason to be
concerned about toxic chemicals leaking into the underground
water reserve. The water reserve is replenished by slow seepage
of rainwater and sometimes by leaking gas station tanks and the
like.
Underground structures sometimes cause strange flow of the
reserve, sometimes you get nice mountain rain, sometimes your
neighbors septic tank. The vast majority of supplies have no
health problems. The ground is very good at filtering out
biological containments but not very effective against chemical
pollution.
Sometimes the waterflow is not good enough due fairly solid
rock, a driller sometimes treats the well with acid or
explosives to increase the number and size of the cracks
in the rock.
- gerry
|
58.632 | Wells, that's a deep subject | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Thu Aug 06 1987 10:54 | 22 |
| There are two types of wells, shallow wells and deep wells (artesian).
Check the DEC standard issue dictionary (The American Heritage
Dictionary) for a diagram of each.
Shallows wells (10 - 50 feet) get their water from the surounding
ground water supply and react quickly to the local conditions and
climate. That is, contaminates in the ground can easily find their way
into the well and dry weather with dry up your well. The rain the falls
today will end up in your well within days.
Deep wells (50 - 1000 feet) get their water from underground streams
and water tables that are separate from the local ground water by a
layer of impervious material (clay and/or bedrock). This water
supplying usually has beeen in the ground longer (years) and traveled
great distances (good filtering action) to reach your well. The deep
well doesn't react as quickly to local conditions. You generally need
several years of dry weather before you notice changes in a deep well
water supply. Local contaminates shouldn't reach your well because of
the impervious layer. But then again, contaminates miles away may enter
the supply source for your well.
Charly
|
58.633 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Aug 06 1987 11:46 | 25 |
| Re: .3
I think the divider between "shallow" and "deep" is about 25 to
30 feet; less than that and you can use a vacuum pump; deeper
than that and you need a submersible or a jet pump.
The term "artesian" is widely misused. Strictly speaking, an artesian
well is one in which, after you drill it, the water flows out of
the well by itself. What well drillers typically call "artesian"
wells are more properly called bedrock wells, I believe.
The water table tends to rise and fall with the season, the amount
of rain/snow, and the amount of wells drawing water. As pointed
out, deep wells take some time to react to weather conditions. Wells
are drilled deeper than the water table to 1) increase flow rates;
2) provide a safety margin for exceptionally dry conditions or
heavy use; 3) to provide a storage area. Although the water level
in your well may be only 50' below ground, the well may be 150'
deep. That way, you can draw on the column of water in your well
and have no problems with short periods of very heavy water usage,
even if the actual flow of water into the well is quite slow.
In that example, by the way, the pump would probably be at about
125' to allow a 25' area at the bottom for crud to build up without
getting into the pump (assuming you have a submersible pump) and
fouling up the works.
|
58.669 | Help - well under house | CRETE::FLANNERY | | Thu Aug 06 1987 11:48 | 14 |
| We're in the midst of doing outside work on our prehistoric
house. In trying to fix one problem (that we hadn't planned
on) we came across another (does it ever end?!). Anyway,
under one of the additions on the house there is a crawl
space and in the crawl space we found an old open well.
We have never been able to get this room warm and now we
know why. As one of the carpenters said, in the winter when
it freezes it's like walking on a block of ice. What do we
do with this thing? And any ideas on how to keep this room
below sub-zero?
Thanks.
-k
|
58.670 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Aug 06 1987 11:51 | 1 |
| Fill it with sand?
|
58.671 | | CRETE::FLANNERY | | Thu Aug 06 1987 14:01 | 2 |
| This may be a stupid question but if we fill it with sand,
what happens to the water?
|
58.672 | | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Thu Aug 06 1987 14:08 | 4 |
| How deep is it? Is the water all the way to the top? I wouldn't
think the water would freeze if it was deep in a hole. Maybe just
covering it with a concrete slab would do it.
|
58.673 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Aug 06 1987 18:39 | 25 |
| Re: .2
The water will go back into the surrounding soil. This might take
a little while - you couldn't fill the well all at once, probably.
Basically what you have is
ground level
--------------------- ------------
| |
| |
dirt | | dirt
| |
. . . . . . . . . . |_______|. . . . . . . .water table level in ground
| |
| water |
dirt | | dirt
|_______|
If you fill in the well, the water the fill displaces will seep
back into the surrounding dirt until everything stabilized at the
level of the water table (the current level of the water in the
well). Since it would take a little while for the water to seep
back into the surrounding dirt, you'd probably have to do the filling
somewhat slowly, to give the water time to seep out into the
surrounding dirt and "seek its own level" again.
|
58.674 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Thu Aug 06 1987 18:41 | 5 |
| After all this talking about the well, I doubt that it's the cause
of your cold floor. I suspect you have a cold floor because you
have a drafty foundation (loose fieldstone, probably?) that the
cold breezes are merrily blowing through, and no insulation in
the floor.
|
58.675 | Expect work when you least expect it | VLNVAX::SUMNER | Senility has set in | Thu Aug 06 1987 20:09 | 12 |
|
"Bank gravel" is a sand/gravel mixture and would be a less
expensive option to plain sand with the same results. Filling the hole
probably won't warm the room though, try insulating the foundation
and/or floor.
When remodeling a house this formula works for most things...
1 hour planned work + 1 hour unplaned work = job completed/exhaustion.
Glenn
|
58.676 | in looking further | CRETE::FLANNERY | | Fri Aug 07 1987 13:18 | 18 |
| In regards to the "drafty foundation" mentioned in .5, we've
found out why it's so cold - somebody cut about a 5-6 ft.
span out of the foundation and never covered it much less
supported it. The floor is also not insulated. Guess what our
*next* jobs are??
As for the well, I got a note off-line from someone who
suggested looking at the benefits rather than the detriments
of having a well. In looking at it, it's very full and apprears
clear to the bottom. It also seems to be spring fed as we
have underground rivers flowing toward the house. So, until
we have time to really think about this, I think we'll just
cover it and insulate the h*ll out of that room. Guess the
floor had to come up eventually...
Thanks for all the suggestions.
-k
|
58.634 | Confusing to 1st timers - like me | BCSE::DMCOBURN | | Fri Aug 07 1987 14:44 | 31 |
| Timely topic, since I have my first well also.
My well is 408' deep, with the 1/2 HP pump located at 380'( always
wondered about that difference ). The 'static' level is 20'. The
flow was only 2 gpm when initially drilled, and it was decided to
'fracture' the walls to try to get a better flow. We were lucky.
It ended up being 4 gpm. So far, we haven't run out.
In the basement is a pump switch which goes on at 35 PSI and off
at 55 PSI, as gauged by the pressure tank/valve located in the main
water line. This pressure tank is what regulates the water pressure
in the house. Then there is a cartridge water filter in the main
line to extract any sediment which gets pumped up, and enormous
amounts of 'iron'. I have to replace the cartridge at least once
a month, or my water pressure in the house goes to near nothing,
even though the tank is showing 35 to 55 PSI.
Hope this helps a bit.
Some things I've wondered about is :
o is the pump big enough to handle that deep a well? Specs
the Sears catalogue seem to indicate a 1-2 HP pump for that
kind of depth.
o Does 'static level' mean that the storage water rises to the
20' level, which means there is 408'-20' - 388' of water stored
in the well? How can I calculate the number of gallons that
represents?
- Vaughn
|
58.635 | | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Fri Aug 07 1987 22:51 | 15 |
| Re: Calculating the number of gallons in the hole.
You are correct with your depth measurments ( the distance from the
pump to the top of the water). For a 6" hole which is probably what was
used, you can figure on 1 1/2 gallons per foot. So 3 hundred feet of
water would be 450 gallons.
FYI. Wells are usually drilled with an 8" hole through the top soil
into the bedrock, 10 - 30 feet, then a steel pipe is inserted into the
hole and sealed around the outside with some kind of drilling cement.
This protects your well from the ground water. Then the drilling
proceeds using a 6" drill bit until they obtain the desired water
flow.
Charly
|
58.636 | Who built this thing then... ? | PFLOYD::WROTHBERG | WB1HBB | Mon Aug 10 1987 10:42 | 43 |
| All of this has been very enlightening. So
here's my problem. My house is 10 years old. We
are the third (maybe fourth) owners.
I do not know how deep my well is except to say
that the well company dropped some pebbles in my
well and said that the water level dropped from
150 ft to 260 ft after 15 minutes of running one
faucet. I also have a 1/2 horse submersable.
My pressure lately has been fluctuating
day-to-day from 55 psi to 30 psi. One day I ran
out of water alltogether. Just had air in the
pipes. That's the day I called the well company.
They want me to spend $1200 to have the well
"hydrofracted". That is, to force water and air
into the well at extremely high pressure to
"clean out the veins". No blasting is involved.
I have been holding off to see what the pressure
does from day to day and have gotten by ok for
the last week as long as I watch the pressure and
don't do too many loads of laundry when the
pressure is low.
I have never had any problem during the winter
months and am tempted to wait it out.
Has anyone ever had similar problems ? I am open
to all suggestions. (This is also my first
well.) By the way, I have been trying to find out
who dug my well so I can get the original specs
on it. This has been a fruitless search. I
can't even find out who built my house. The
permit was issued to a private citizen who then
hired some building contractor. The citizen is
now in parts unknown, and the Derry NH
authorities have no records concerning the
builder and/or subcontractors.
Thanks,
Warren
|
58.637 | More well info... | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Mon Aug 10 1987 12:42 | 36 |
| Re: .7
I don't think that you'll find any "specs" on the well. The well
driller drills the hole, tells you how deep it is so that you can pass
this info onto the pump installer. Many times the well driller and pump
installer are two different companies. Unless you can find a receipt
from the well driller or from the pump installer, I don't think you'll
find any more "official" info or written specs.
As far as the pressure goes, 30 - 55 PSI is fine and has ABSOLUTELY,
POSITIVELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE AMOUNT OF WATER IN THE WELL, unless
it's empty and then the pressure would be ZERO.
The pump pressurizes the plumbing in your house and is controled by a
pressure switch that has a low and a high setting, usually somewhere
around 30 - 55 PSI. When you open a faucet, the water flows out and the
pressure in the pipes begins to drop. When it drops to the low setting,
the pump turns on and rasies the pressure to the high setting and then
shuts off. This way the pump doesn't have to run every time you wash
your hands or get a glass of water.
This will work if you have hundreds of gallons of water in the well or
if you are down to 1 gallon. Only when the water level drops below the
intake for the pump will you know that you have run out. Some wells
will give you dirty water shortly before they run out other wells
will not.
To repeat, water pressure in the house is controlled by the pump and
pressure settings on the control switch and has nothing to do with the
amount of water in the hole! Unless it's EMPTY. Watch the pressure
gauge sometime when someone if taking a shower. You should see it drop
to 35 PSI or so, hear a click and then the pressure should rise up to
55 PSI or so, hear another click and then the pressure will start to
fall again.
Charly
|
58.638 | Taps before the Pressure Valve | BCSE::DMCOBURN | | Mon Aug 10 1987 14:17 | 15 |
| Thanks, Charly, for this information. If I can impose once more:
I'm thinking of tapping off the main water line BEFORE the pressure
valve for an outside water source. If I understand correctly, this
means that when running water through that outside tap, the pump
will be running constantly.
Will this eventually kill the pump, by overworking it? Will the
water pressure in that outside line get much higher the 55 PSI
( or whatever the pump is rated at )? What happens to the water
flow and pressure to the rest of the house?
Thanks again.
- Vaughn
|
58.639 | | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Mon Aug 10 1987 15:24 | 27 |
| No the pump won't run constantly, the pump only runs when the pressure
control switch tells it to. There are check valves installed between
the pump and the controls so that water doesn't flow back through the
pump when it shuts off. If you tap in between the check valve and the
pressure control/gauge, this would be the same as tapping in any where
after the gauge. If you tap in before the check valve, when you use
this water you will quickly reduce the pressure in this part of the
system and then you'll have nothing because the pressure switch still
sees adequate pressure in the house.
Crude diagram follows...
O = Pressure gauge
X = Pressure control switch
^ and > = One way check valves
O
-------------->----+-X------ House plumbing
| |
| Tank
|
^
|
PUMP
Charly
|
58.640 | More questions about filters........ | CELICA::WELLS | | Tue Aug 11 1987 17:06 | 16 |
| I want to thank you all for your response to my original question. All
of this information has been very educational to me.
A few replies ago, someone mentioned filters for the system. I
would appreciate a few comments as to what filters are needed.
Are you talking about one filter that "filters" everything. Or
are there different filters for different things depending on
what the problem may be. Does everyone that has a well use a
filter? Also, how often should well water be tested?
Thanks again,
Pat
|
58.641 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Tue Aug 11 1987 20:01 | 26 |
| I have a "dirt and rust" cartridge filter. It takes out stray gravel,
sand, etc. It does ***NOT*** take out dissolved iron. Dissolved
iron in the water stays dissolved until it reacts with oxygen (in
your toilet bowl or washing machine, for example), at which point
it precipitates out and forms its typical rusty stains on everything.
I also have a water softener, which does take out the iron, although
if I were to do it again I think I'd get a different system, one
designed specifically to remove iron. A water softener is really
designed to remove dissovled lime and manganese, and there are better
ways to remove iron, as I've found from other notes in this file.
If you're using your water now and don't have any complaints about
its quality, don't worry about filters or water treatment equipment.
You need them only if there is something about the water you don't
like. If you don't like the taste, or smell, or whatever, get the
water tested to find out what is in it that is causing the problem
and go from there. Your best bet is probably to find a reliable
and trustworthy company that deals in water treatment stuff and
throw yourself at their mercy and take their recommendations about
what to do. How you find one, I'm not sure....
As far as testing the water for bacteria, etc., I generally do it
once a year, just for the heck of it. In a deep well the chances
of contamination are very small and you don't need to worry about
it much.
|
58.642 | I got lucky, plenty of water. | ZEPPO::SULLIVAN | Mark Sullivan | Thu Aug 13 1987 13:18 | 24 |
|
Well after two years of preparation, construction has begun in earnest.
Land is all cleared, the foundation hole starts today and the well
went in yesterday.
I was done by Mike Sullivan in Bolton. I would highly recommend
him. I called his house yesterday afternoon to tell him the area
was cleared. When I went to the lot last night the well was there.
220 feet deep with the first 52 feet needing casing. ($7/ft to drill,
$7/ft. for casing) 20+ gallons/minute. Looks like I may need to
do something about iron (I think he said it looks like 5 ppm, does
that sound right?). Will know more when I get the test results next
week.
The next step is to put in the pump and run it for two days to clear
out the well. Then get a sample for testing. Most people seem to
have a 1/2 hp pump. Anything I should know about pumps before committing
myself. I know I want to have better water pressure than my parents
have. Theirs stinks. Once the pressure tank hits the point where
the pump comes on, the pressure drops drastically.
Mark
|
58.644 | Yup, I want a green lawn | CHAPLN::SULLIVAN | Mark Sullivan | Fri Aug 14 1987 10:15 | 0 |
58.645 | Thar' she blows! | ZEPPO::SULLIVAN | The building has started!!! | Tue Aug 18 1987 13:04 | 14 |
|
More info...
Turns out my well is delivering at 42 gallons/min.!!! Anyone
heard of any problems with the pipeline from the Wachuset Reservoir?
:-)
They installed the pump before talking it over with me. Put
in a 1/2 horse, ~12 gal/min. pump. I have asked him to change it
to a 1 horse, ~20 gal/min. version. I would hope I can water a lawn
with that much water!
Mark
|
58.208 | Construction Blasting: Effects on Water Supply? | PFLOYD::WROTHBERG | WB1HBB | Tue Sep 15 1987 11:05 | 30 |
| Construction and blasting for new houses
continues within a half-mile of my house. This
has been going on for a year and will continue
who knows how long.
In the last year, my neighbors and I have all
seen new water supply problems. One house went
from 2.5 gals per min recovery to less the
one-half.
We have all talked to different well companies
and the consensus is that the blasting is
clogging the veins to our wells. However,
proving that is another matter.
Four houses on our short street are now for sale
for that reason. Most of us want to stay but we
are at a loss on what action (if any) to take.
Most just want to wait out the construction and
then re-deg or hydrofract if they can hold out
that long. Some want to start a petition to
prevent further blasting. These new houses are
all being in into the side of granite ledge in
NH. (Their back yards are 15' deep with a 40'
cliff at the back).
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Warren
|
58.209 | Get a lawyer. | STEREO::BEAUDET | | Tue Sep 15 1987 13:22 | 4 |
| Get a good lawyer - sounds like a case for a "class action".
/tb/
|
58.210 | Hire a Civil Engineer first! | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Shoot 'em all, let God sort 'em out. | Thu Sep 17 1987 11:18 | 62 |
| I have a little trouble believing the "clogging the veins" theory
esposed by the well diggers. Are they uphill from you? Are they
blasting on all sides of you? Are your wells down into the granite?
In addition, when you asked the well diggers their opinion you probably
asked something like "could the blasting up the road be affecting
our wells?" thus pre-determining the answer. Bad move. You want
an objective opinion. I don't think you got one.
It would be hard to plug all the veins in an area around your
properties. Generally speaking, if your wells are dug in granite
bedrock, the mode of transmission of water is through cracks in
the granite (aside - have you checked your radon levels?). I would
think blasting would create more cracks. To plug a vein or crack,
you need a variety of particle sizes. The large particles plug
the cracks, the next size particles plug the interstices between
the larger particles, etc. The last size particle (smallest) needed
to complete this "feeding chain" is clay. Is there a large quantity
of clay that is being carried into the bedrock. Not likely in a
granite landscape. (though clay is one decay product of granite
it usually winds up in stream and lake beds)
I've beaten that one to death. I would suggest a more likely cause
is a lowering of the water table in your area. This can happen
from a number of causes:
1) drought conditions - it it unusually dry in your area? This
summer was pretty dry in New England.
2) increased water usage with limited supply/re-supply - a lot
of new houses all tapping into the same cracks in the bedrock may
strain the capacity of the area. Not too likely, but possible.
Re-supply of ground water < than usage. (drought may affect the
re-supply, naturally)
3) Some new change in the landscape such that the water in the
bedrock is allowed to drain away. Is the blasting below (significantly)
you such that it would reduce the levels in your wells.
your house /\
/ \
| |
------------------------ - old ground level
well - | \
| \
old water ----|---- \ - new cut (could be far away)
table | \
| \
new water ----|---- \
table \*** - springs (your water)
You may want to spend your money on a civil engineer and a survey
(I have a degree in CE but haven't used it since just out of college)
before wasting your money on lawyers and what appears to be a flimsy
premise.
If you can provide me with more information, I may be able to provide
some better insight into your problems. The relative height of
things is very important, since water runs down hill even underground.
Regards,
Stan
|
58.211 | another uninformed opinion | YODA::BARANSKI | Law?!? Hell! Give me *Justice*! | Thu Sep 17 1987 12:10 | 6 |
| It seems to me that the most likely thing is that the blasting is opening up
drains to lower the water level, rather then it clogging your wells. This could
happen even if the blasting was being done above your homes. It sounds just as
likely that you could get it stopped... (read maybe yes, maybe no).
Jim.
|
58.212 | Where is the water going? | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Shoot 'em all, let God sort 'em out. | Thu Sep 17 1987 15:20 | 19 |
| re: .3
Not likely. The water has to drain somewhere. In theory, the area
below the water table is saturated (hence water table). The water
has to drain down hill, the cracks would have to lead somewhere.
You could blast a hole the size of Quabbin reservoir, but that
would fill up and the water table return to the original level.
You really are going to have to look at the topography, geology,
recent weather, construction in the area, etc. before entering a
lawsuit. After all, the other side will.
How deep is your well? Are you on top of a hill? At the bottom?
Are there streams nearby? What is up hill of you? Downhill?
Where is the granite ledge? How deep is it from the surface?
When did you buy the house (i.e. what was the orginal flow/recovery
and when)? How long ago did you start to experience water problems?
I want a couple points on the time line relative to the blasting.
Stan
|
58.213 | A cheap test for water table level. | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Shoot 'em all, let God sort 'em out. | Thu Sep 17 1987 15:44 | 0 |
58.214 | Lowering The Water Table | LDP::BURKHART | | Thu Sep 17 1987 17:11 | 0 |
58.215 | How do you get artisian wells? | YODA::BARANSKI | Law?!? Hell! Give me *Justice*! | Sat Sep 19 1987 02:12 | 6 |
| RE: .4
But possible... There is permiable rock, and impermiable rock. That's how
you get true artisian wells...
Jim.
|
58.216 | Questions Answered (I think) | PFLOYD::WROTHBERG | WB1HBB | Mon Sep 21 1987 10:13 | 42 |
| Ok, let me see if I remember all the questions.
1. I have lived in this house 3.5 years. No
water problems until the past year when
construction in my area really started moving.
2. I live 280 ft MSL about 50' above and .5
miles from Big Island Pond in Derry.
3. There is a 550' hill to the N.W. of me.
4. My well is approx 350' deep.
5. The water table is 8'.
6. Virtually all the construction is downhill
from me and within .5 miles. Approx 50 houses in
the last year.
7. Granite ledge at 6' level (per plot plan and
backup documents).
8. Problem seems to be recovery rate in well.
9. Water level in well when fully recovered
seems to be at 150' level.
10. Pump is at approx 300' level.
11. I believe it is a .5 hp pump.
12. I have checked the control box at the
pressure tank to try to determine at what
pressure setting the pump kicks on. No
instructions inside the "grey box". I would like
to change the setting from approx 25 psi to 35
psi. (Maybe this would help avert the in-house
shortage).
Did I forget anything ?
Warren
|
58.217 | Probably a mechanical problem! | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Shoot 'em all, let God sort 'em out. | Mon Sep 21 1987 13:40 | 29 |
| From the information provided, I would guess that you should have
no problem with the water level in your well. I suggest you look
for a mechanical solution to your problem. One thing I remember
from back when my family had a well is that the pressure tank would
get air-bound. The pressure tank has a bubble of air at the top
to pressurize the system (since water is virtually incompressible).
What would happen, I think, was too much air would accumulate
in the tank and the pump would run and run with little result.
(are these your symptoms?) The solution was to bleed some of the
air off the tank. It seems to me this had to be done every couple
years or so (maybe the right time period?). I have never done this
so I can't give you directions, any plumber should be able to help.
If this is the problem, I would think that raising the pressure in
the tank would temporarily improve the situation.
What tests have you done to determine the problem? Naturally the
first thought to come to mind is that the pump is going. Those
things are pretty reliable. If you want to test the pump, you can tap
in to the line before the pressure tank to see if there is any problem
on the pump end. If quantity and pressure are high from the pump
from the well you can eliminate the pump and proceed to inside the
house.
Good luck,
Stan
Of course none of this would explain your neighbors problems, unless
you all bought your houses at the same time and the same thing happened
to all of them. A little hard to believe.
|
58.49 | PH Problem | NFL::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Thu Sep 24 1987 15:59 | 31 |
| I just received the water analysis from my soon to be well
in Kingston, NH. (I am moving in the end of October)
The water appears to be soft, but acidic. I am concerned with
the effect of the acidic water and would be interested in
possible solutions to the problem. The house is three years old
and the previous owner has had to replace the hot water heating
element already! Since the water is soft I guess a water softener
is not the way to go. I would think filters would not effect the PH
either. Is it possible, or better yet, economical to correct this
problem or should I just live with it. Their is also a septic
system so the effect of any solutions on the septic system would
have to be taken into account.
Water Analysis:
Test Type standard My water
------------------ ---------- ----------
total coliform 0/100 milliliters 0
chlorides 250 mg/liter 4
PH 7.0 6.5
hardness 0-75 is soft 62
Manganese 0.05 mg/liter 0.005
sodium 20 mg/liter 7.0
iron 0.3 mg/liter 0.005
Nitrate 10 mg/liter 0.2
nitrite 10 mg/liter 0.10
Any comments or suggestions?
-JFK-
|
58.50 | | JOET::JOET | Deatht�ngue lives! | Fri Sep 25 1987 06:54 | 9 |
| re: .13
You ought to bottle the stuff and sell it!
Seriously, though, there are many reasons for a HW tank to bite
the big one. As a guess, I'd doubt that a .5 ph difference is the
culprit.
-joet
|
58.51 | re: .14 | CSMADM::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Fri Sep 25 1987 11:21 | 13 |
|
re: .14
>I'd doubt that a .5 ph difference is the culprit.
My reason for concern is a combination of the HW heating element
failure and the footnote in the water analysis statement that says:
"A PH of 6.0 to 6.6 is moderately acidic and may cause piping
corrosion".
The solution I would like to hear is "DO NOTHING". But I am no
expert. Has anyone else had a problem with a PH of 6.5?
-JFK-
|
58.52 | Not to worry! | SAWDST::PAQUETTE | Colonial Computing Nut | Fri Sep 25 1987 13:54 | 15 |
|
As a former Water Treatment Chemist, let me assure you that well water
of 6.5 ph is just what you should expect. The "standard" of 7 exists only
in the laboratory! All good natural ground water is "slightly acidic".
Many communities spend big bucks to boost the ph to as high as 9 to
reduce the corrosive effects of water on pipe in public systems.
You're water is not going to give you excessive corrosion.
Remember that water will corrode just about anything it comes in contact
with given enough time!
-=Dennis
|
58.53 | thanks | CSMADM::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Fri Sep 25 1987 14:07 | 4 |
| Thanks Dennis, I feel much better about this now.
Hope the Heater element was a fluke.
-JFK-
|
58.54 | 6.5 ain't bad | AIMHI::GOETZ | | Mon Sep 28 1987 14:27 | 13 |
| Having a ph of 6.5 isn't bad, just as you've seen in previous replies.
I've looked into systems to raise the ph of water (mine's 5.2),
the systems are expensive and unless you use an industrial model,
the units only raise the ph about one point. (from 6.5 - 7.5)
The cause of water heater element failure is probably due to other
minerals in the water. In fact, that's on my "project" list as
well.
Oh the joys of being a homeowner !!! :^)
Al Goetz
|
58.55 | You could sell your water! | DRUID::CHACE | | Wed Sep 30 1987 13:41 | 6 |
| Ditto on your Ph not being a problem. With an analysis like yours
anyone should be VERY happy, you have excellent water. There are
many reasons for an electric heater element to burn out, I doubt
very much if it had anything to do with your water.
Kenny
|
58.568 | more diagnostic help, please? | LDP::SCHNEIDER | | Wed Oct 07 1987 09:09 | 36 |
| This seems to be a good place for another pump diagnostic question.
I'm mostly ignorant about the control system, so please bear with
me.
My system has just developed an intermittent problem. Hasn't happened
often enough to be very sure, but the occurrences are perhaps brought
on by fairly high demand situations (washer, shower.) What happens
is that the pump don't pump, even though the control system is quite
clearly trying to do something, as evidenced by the relay chattering
every half minute or so.
The first time it happened, I opened the control box (contains a
relay and a tubular component called an overload protector), went
through the electrical checks that were conveniently listed inside,
and found nothing amiss. When I put the cover back on the box -
which mates the safety-shutoff connectors - the pump pumped. The
next time the system failed (morning shower), I took the cover off
again to shut it down while I went to work, and when I put it back
together in the evening, the pump pumped once again. A pattern here,
methinks...
If someone could give a brief description of how the control box
functions, I'd be much obliged. I'd especially like to know what's
inside the overload protector and how it works.
Also, is the pump motor likely to be a capacitor-start type, and is the
capacitor perhaps one of the bits inside the overload protector? Any
idea what value the cap would be?
Being a bit of a pessimist, I'm wondering if the pump motor has
a sticky spot from which it can't start up (when warm, say), thus
leading to an overload when a start is attempted.
Any diagnostic ideas much appreciated! Thanks,
Chuck
|
58.56 | Bacteria in the well. | SMAUG::WOODS | Jim Woods | Tue Oct 20 1987 12:07 | 43 |
|
Just to keep this discussion alive, and to see if anyone out there has had
any recent problems with bacteria (and what they did about it), here goes:
I am looking to buy a place in Southern NH that has a dug well. The bank
required me to have a water test done before they would give me financing
(I'm glad they did now). The first test I performed myself. I followed
the water company's instructions to a "T". This test came back with a Total
Coliform level of 30 (per 100ml). The State of NH won't accept a level above
4. At that point, the sellers hired a well company to chlorinate the well,
etc. I was told that the well company pulled out a few roots from it. A few
days later they took another test. This time the Total Coliform came back
at 3. The State and the Bank (and hence, the sellers) said this was fine.
I don't know if I'm convinced it is.
From peering into the well, it seems to be about 15-20 feet deep. The
lining seems to be intact all the way down into the water. The
static level only seems to be 4-5 feet (max) from the bottom. I've
spoken with the neighbors on both sides and they both have wash wells
(about 40 feet deep they said). I asked them if they've ever had any
trouble with bacteria in their wells, and they said that since the 8-10
years they've been living there they've never had the water tested!
The septic system seems to be about 50+ feet away. Also, this house has
been vacant since May of this year. My questions are: How much could
the house being vacant for 5 months have to do with the high bacteria
level (note: Before I took the initial test, I let the water run for a total
of 8 hours)? Could these "roots" be part of my problem? Is a Total
Coliform level of 3 anything I should worry about (The State accepts it,
but they're not the ones drinking it!-)? Could the chlorination process
they did just be a temporary fix? Is there a "simple" (ie. inexpensive)
way to determine if the septic is leaching into my well?
Any advice will be greatly appreciated. I'm suppose to close on this property
this Friday.
Thanks in advance,
-Jim
PS: The owners of the property have passed away so they cannot shed any light
on the subject. (No, they died of heart failure and lung cancer, not drinking
contaminated water. That's the first thing that came to my mind too.-)
|
58.57 | Test Procedures | VINES::BD | You know my name, look up the number! | Tue Oct 20 1987 15:15 | 19 |
| 50 feet is a bit close. Ma. code requires >100 feet.
Stagnant water may have had higher bacteria content.
Rotting roots may have contributed to this. When I had
my house tested, the testing agency recommended running
the water for *24* hours before testing the unused well.
But, they insisted that the water be run from an outside
faucet through a hose drained away and downhill from the well
and the septic system. They pointed out that running the
water down the drain for long periods of time may either
overtake the leaching field's capacity or set up a water
gradient between the leaching field and the well.
Your 8 hr. purge of the well may merely have wash the water
through the septic system and back into the well.
If you are serious about the house you might consider putting
in a new well a bit further away from the septic system.
|
58.58 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Oct 20 1987 15:34 | 105 |
| re: .20
What follows are my own personal guesses/opinions, not necessarily
accurate....
One question: What kind of cover is on the well, and how tight is
it? Shallow dug wells are notoriously susceptible to contamination,
which is why they tend to be avoided these days. A tight cover
is highly recommended. Roots/vegetable matter shouldn't be a source
of coliform bacteria, and the fact that some roots got pulled out of the
well probably isn't relevant unless their presence indicates a
loose cover through which other contamination might enter.
Coliform contamination, by itself, is NOT dangerous. All warm-blooded
animals including you and me have E coli bacteria living in their
gut. It's totally harmless. However, it's an easy bacteria to
test for and its presence indicates the presence of some sort of
animal-derived contamination and the POSSIBLE presence of harmful bacteria.
If the well is still contaminated after being chlorinated, my
guess is that it's getting contaminated from the septic system.
50' is not far enough away to be safe, I don't believe. After
chlorinating (assuming it's done thoroughly), if there is no active
source of contamination the count should be 0. There is a chance
that you might have to chlorinate it more than once, but probably
not.
Even though the well is being contaminated from the septic system
(assuming it is), the water is still "probably" safe to drink because
there "probably" aren't any harmful bacteria (e.g. typhoid, etc.)
present. However, the idea of drinking partially recycled sewage
is not very appealing....
The fact that New Hampshire accepts a count of 4 makes it inconvenient,
because you've got this situation where the odds are (I think) very
good that contamination is occurring, but it's not bad enough to
get the law on your side.
I might be inclined to get the water tested again, since it's had
a few more days to settle down after the chlorine bath, and see
what the results are with a second test. If I had to bet I'd bet
that it would show a count greater than 4.
If you can, I'd see if I could get the sellers to knock a couple
thousand off the selling price for the cost of a new well. If
you can get the water tested again and get results greater than
4 you've got them in a pretty tight corner and they'd almost have
to agree to some sort of price adjustment; as it is, they can say
"it passes state requirements" and you're stuck.
If you REALLY like the house, don't let it keep you from buying
the place. 1) the odds of the water hurting you are minimal;
2) the cost of a wash well is not too horrendous, and since the
neighbors have those you could probably do the same. In the long
run, spending an extra $2K or whatever for a new well would probably
be worth it, even though you will be forever convinced that the
sellers should have paid for it.
The house being vacant for 5 months, if anything, should have reduced
the likelihood of contamination from the septic (I'd guess) since
there would be no water flowing into the septic system to then flow
into the well.
The water testing place should be able to give you some flourescent
dye tablets that you can flush down the toilet. You can then, over
the period of a week or so, take daily samples from the well and
have them examined under ultraviolet light. One dye tablet will
show traces in a million gallons of water, or something astounding
like that. DON'T get any dust from the tablets on your clothes.
I think the dye tablets cost $1.00 apiece or something. Since it
takes a week or so to collect the samples and you're supposed to
close on Friday, I guess this doesn't help much in this immediate
situation. It might be something you could try after you buy the
house, to try to find the source of the contamination (if you get
the water tested and it's still there).
The shortness of your time to take action makes it a bit inconvenient.
I also found it virtually impossible to think rationally when I
was on the verge of closing for my hosue, so I have great empathy
for the situation you are in right now. My summary, after all this
miscellaneous rambling:
Try to get the water tested again. If the results are > 4,
harrangue the sellers and try to get them to knock the cost
of a new well off the price. If it doesn't test > 4, or
if you don't have time to do the test, you might try getting
them to split the cost of a new well with you, or maybe just
forget the whole thing and buy the house, with the idea of
drilling a new well sometime soon. In the meantime, even if
the well is getting contaminated the odds of it hurting you
are truly minimal. After you buy the house, you can re-chlorinate
the well and see if that does any good; it probably won't, but
it's a cheap and easy thing to try. You can try the dye tablets
and see if you can learn anything that way. You probably won't,
but it's an amusing experiment.
While you're doing all this testing, you can buy bottled water to
drink, if you're worried about it, but it probably wouldn't hurt
you to drink the well water.
I had virtually the same situation as you, only I DIDN'T get the
well tested before I bought the house. I chlorinated 5 or 6 times,
to no avail, tried the dye tablets and didn't learn anything, and
finally ended up drilling a new well, 240' worth. A wash well will
be cheaper.
|
58.59 | Consider escrow | NAC::MACK | To err is human; to moo, bovine. | Tue Oct 20 1987 18:26 | 14 |
|
Seeing that the time to closing is so short, you might consider
having some of the money you are paying put into escrow towards
resolution of the well problem. If the well tests satisfactorily
after a month, the money goes to the sellers. If not, the money
goes towards your new well, or some other solution.
The lawyers can figure out the amounts and time periods, or you
can have the bank/whomever set it up.
An escrow account is a nice, fair way to resolve a last minute problem.
dick
|
58.60 | Lots of Granite in NH | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Wed Oct 21 1987 12:11 | 5 |
| re: .20 Lung Cancer??
Forget the water, sounds like you should be checking for radon!
Just kidding, sort of. They were smokers, right?
|
58.61 | | SMAUG::WOODS | Jim Woods | Wed Oct 21 1987 12:25 | 48 |
|
re: .22
> One question: What kind of cover is on the well, and how tight is
> it?
The cover is cement which appeared to be on very tight. The well
company that went out to chlorinate the well could not get the cover
off. They had to cut a 8x8 "access hole" in the top so that they could
get a look inside. They cut this in such a way that the piece cut out can
be inserted back onto the cover of the well. NOW, it seems that the cover
could let in contaminates because this piece doesn't fit tight, but I guess
that's something I'll deal with later.
> The fact that New Hampshire accepts a count of 4 makes it inconvenient,
> because you've got this situation where the odds are (I think) very
> good that contamination is occurring, but it's not bad enough to
> get the law on your side.
Yes, this is the hangup right now. I was told this morning by the chemist at
Chemserve in Milford NH that starting next year the State will NOT accept a
coliform level of greater than 0. Doesn't help me now, but NEXT time ...
re: .23
> Seeing that the time to closing is so short, you might consider
> having some of the money you are paying put into escrow towards
> resolution of the well problem. If the well tests satisfactorily
> after a month, the money goes to the sellers. If not, the money
> goes towards your new well, or some other solution.
This is EXACTLY what I tried, however the sellers were *strongly* opposed
to this idea because seeing the State and the Bank accepted the water test
it MUST mean that the well is okay ...
re: .24
>They were smokers, right?
I hope so.-)
Someone once mentioned to me that you can "clean" the walls of the well.
Anybody ever do this? Is this as simple as pumping all the water out of
the well, climbing down there and scrubbing the walls with a brush/sponge
and cleaner?? What type of cleaner should be used?
I have since dropped off another water sample and I'll post the results ...
|
58.62 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Oct 21 1987 13:44 | 9 |
| Re: cleaning the walls of the well:
I'm not sure what might be intended by this. In general, I don't
think you have to. I've never heard of anybody doing it. One
thing that can/should be done is to wash down the walls when the
well gets chlorinated; presumably the people who chlorinated the well
did it. After dumping in the chlorine, hook up a hose and recycle
the water through the well (run the hose into the well), and in
the process of doing that wash down the walls with the hose.
|
58.64 | The results are in! | SMAUG::WOODS | Jim Woods | Thu Oct 22 1987 17:09 | 8 |
|
The results came back from my latest water test and the total coliform
level was a 0. Looks like the problem with the other tests were either:
a) the water hadn't been run long enough, or b) the other samples were
improperly taken ...
-Jim
|
58.65 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Oct 23 1987 11:50 | 8 |
| HORRAY!!!!
Congratulations, etc. You'll probably want to keep an eye on things
(I think it's recommended that a shallow well get tested at least
once a year) but it sounds as though the situation is under control
for now.
Good luck at the closing!
|
58.493 | Protecting the Pump!!! | SAWDST::PAQUETTE | Colonial Computing Nut | Mon Oct 26 1987 09:00 | 11 |
| Speaking of Well pumps, Does anyone know of a device that "cuts off"
a well pump when the well goes dry?? ...or any simple device that can tell
you when the water level is getting low in the well?
We have had a bad experience with a NEW washer draining our well. The
pump motor was hot but fortunately it didn't burn up...
I want to prevent this from happening again (WE FIXED THE WASHER!)
-=Dennis
|
58.494 | A Water Sense Switch | AIMHI::GOETZ | | Mon Oct 26 1987 12:06 | 17 |
| Dennis,
The device that shuts off your pump when there's no water is a thermal
overload protector. The pump relies on the water for cooling, so,
if there is none then the pump gets hot and shuts itself off.
You might be able to rig up a water sense switch and place it 1-2
feet above your pump (assuming it's a submersible pump). Then
the switch would need to be wired in series with the pressure switch.
(low pressure + water present = pump on).
I haven't seen any factory configured set-ups like this. (but then,
I haven't looked)
Good luck.
|
58.495 | sump pump switch | FREDW::MATTHES | | Mon Oct 26 1987 16:30 | 4 |
| Sounds like the perfect place for a switch like you find on a sump
pump. Water raises the float and closes the circuit.
No water - broken circuit to the pump motor - no power.
|
58.496 | | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Mon Oct 26 1987 22:49 | 7 |
| Most installations I have seen (at least for deep wells) have a
dual purpose pump switch - 1) normally it turns the pump on when the
water pressure (in the pressure tank) drops to a certain level,
and shuts it off when it reaches a higher level.
The second purpose is to turn the pump off (needing a manual reset)
it it drops too low, indicating that the water level is too low.
|
58.218 | Water: Hot and Cold running Acid | AKOV68::CRAMER | | Wed Nov 04 1987 16:19 | 17 |
| I have a problem with my water (my own well). It seems that the
ph is 5.6 to 5.9. This is apparently causing such problems as
blue stained bathtub and pinholes in my pipes.
We just bought the house, circa 1962, last year and have decided
that an acid neutralizer is probably a good idea. However, we also
have moderately hard water and have been told that the neutralizer
would make this very hard, so that a softener is probably a requirement
as well.
The reasoning seems to make sense. Have I missed anything, and does
anyone know of any good names in the business?
Thanks
Alan
|
58.219 | pure and simple | SVCRUS::CRANE | trust me, I know what I'm doing | Wed Nov 04 1987 16:40 | 11 |
|
My parents house had a really bad problem with well water. It
was heavily tainted with iron (I mean heavily). They installed
a Culligan system that uses salt to filter. There are three separate
units in the system. A deionizer, A nuetralizer and something else.
I don't Know what the third Unit is but the water problem went away
and things are 200% better since the system was installed 2 years
ago.
John c.
|
58.220 | simple & pure? | USWAV1::FITEK | | Wed Nov 04 1987 23:24 | 9 |
| Blue staining and some corrosion was noticed in my plumbing, plus
the bitter morning water taste, (probably copper & lead (from solder)).
I looked at various systems and decided on a 'no" maintenace "upflow'
tank with a form of 'lime'? neutralizer from A F Water Conditioning
Store in Ayer 772-6773. I was able to install it myself and have
had the problems go away and almost 2 years without a refill. I
recommend it, just a tank with the inflow on the bottom, and out
the top, no need for any control gadgets or backflushing. regards
Hank
|
58.443 | Another noisy question... | DECWIN::NISHIMOTO | | Thu Dec 03 1987 09:38 | 10 |
| Another question - is it correct to assume that the noise that a
well pump produces is proportional to the $$ they cost? I currently
have a pump which, when it engages, can be heard from the basement
to the 2nd floor quite easily. There seems nothing wrong with the
pump, except that it is loud (I think it is a Wayne). You folks
with well pump experience, please let me know becuase if I can
get a quieter one, I might. Probable cost would be nice too.
Pete
|
58.619 | How fast (much) do you pump? | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | It's better in the Bahamas. | Thu Dec 03 1987 11:27 | 4 |
| Another suggestion. If your well is that shallow, you may just quickly
suck it dry. Then you have to wait for it to fill before you start
your pump again. If this is the case, you will need a storage/pressure
tank. Did the previous owners have such an arrangement?
|
58.444 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Dec 03 1987 13:22 | 29 |
| re: .4
The pump is in the basement, I take it?
It's hard to say if you can get a quieter one, because "loud" is
in the ears of the hearer. Maybe I would call your pump quiet,
although from your description it sounds noisier than I'd expect.
If the pump is in the basement though, you'll probably hear it
no matter what kind you have.
The ancient piston pump at my grandfather's farm could be heard
upstairs, although I wouldn't call the noise obejctionable; it
was sort of nice to hear, because you knew the pump was working.
The ancient piston pump in the first house I rented could be heard
upstairs, making a soft "pocka-pocka" noise; again, not what I would
call objectionable.
Both of those were shallow well pumps.
My uncle has a deep well "jet" pump in his basement; you can hear
it, but once again I wouldn't call it particularly loud.
I'm not sure about the cost of these things; do you have a shallow
(less than about 28') or a deep well? Shallow well pumps are
considerably cheaper. Regardless of the kind of well, you could
get a submersible pump to go in the well, but then you'd be talking
maybe $500-$600 (wild guess), plus you'd need to dig a trench to
run the wiring to the well, etc. If you can use a shallow well
pump, you could probably get one for a couple hundred. A deep-well
pump in the basement...I'm not sure. $500???
Maybe the pump you have is just worn and if it were rebuilt it might
be quieter....might be worth asking a pump person about.
|
58.445 | Pumps are noisy. | VIDEO::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Sun Dec 06 1987 15:39 | 16 |
| Noisy pumps... I replaced my shallow-well pump with a Goulds
pump about 5 years ago; it's just about as noisy as the Sears
one I replaced. I can hear it on the second floor.
Most shallow-well and deep-well pumps are "jet pumps" these days.
The shallow-well version just has the jet (venturi) in the pump
body rather than in a gizmo in the well. This has the advantage
of running only one pipe from the well.
As I understand it, all jet pumps are noisy because of what is
called "cavitation noise" which occurs as the water is accelerated
by the impeller.
If you want a quiet pump, I think you'll have to get a submersible or put
the pump in a well house.
--tom
|
58.677 | Well pump and tank systems... | RNGLNG::JORGENSEN | | Mon May 02 1988 09:48 | 45 |
|
I am getting ready to replace my well pump and tank, and wanted
to throw out a few questions before I take the plunge.... Info
on my well are:
1. Dug well water is about 20 feet below the level of the pump.
2. Presently have a 1/2 HP Goulds jet pump with a two hose jet
package... one for pulling water up, and the other for pushing
some back down.
3. Have a 46 gallon non-captive air type tank... rusting through.
I planned to replace the tank with a Sears 70 gallon captive
air type tank. I decided to go with such a large tank because
I wanted the reserve for power outages, and felt that the larger
tank would mean less cycling on my pump. I do alot of garden
work and watering in the summer, and my present pump/tank system
runs continuosly when I use the hose... indoor water pressure
is down to about 40lbs during this period. Based on this, and
my dislike for plastic pumps (mabey unjustified, but I like
cast iron better) I had decided to buy the Sears deep well two
stage jet pump which is a 1HP unit. It is rated at 12.7 GPM
from a draw level 40ft below the pump. My objectives are less
pump cycling, and a greater available flow of water.
Questions:
1. Does this pump/tank setup sound like it will do the job?
2. Has anyone had any good/bad experiences with Sears pumps
or tanks? Does anyone know which company makes them for
Sears?
3. Does anyone have any info on the use of an air check valve
for the tank? I saw one at Sears, it is a plastic cup with
a platic ball inside, and as far as I can tell, it mounts
onto the water tank.
BTW the Sears pump and tank product line is on sale in one of
their sale mini-catologues now through June.
Any feedback appreciated, as this is my first pump experience.
/Kevin
|
58.678 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon May 02 1988 14:00 | 11 |
| Just one question: who is going to fix your Sears pump when it needs
servicing?
I think that in the long run you'd be better off buying a brand
such a Gould that has a dealer network. Gould pumps last forever,
too. I have my doubts about Sears.
You're talking about pumping 12.7gpm...are you sure your dug well
can supply that much? The biggest pump and tank in the world won't
help much if you pump the well dry.
I would be inclined to replace the pressure tank, and talk to a
Gould pump dealer about getting the pump you've got rebuilt, if
necessary.
|
58.679 | Who makes Sears... | HPSTEK::JORGENSEN | | Mon May 02 1988 15:13 | 13 |
|
I feel confident that my well will supply the water... the water
table in my area is quite high. My query about the real
manufacturer of the Sears pump was aimed at trying to figure
out who might support it should it break... for all I know
Gould makes the Sears pumps! I aggree that replacing the tank
is my first priority, but I decided that I might as well
do the whole thing, pump and all while I was at it. The pump
that is in the house is the original... 35 years young.
I will take your advice and look at the Gould pump line.
/Kevin
|
58.446 | Keep it simple and easy.... | TOLKIN::FARLEY | | Tue Jun 21 1988 13:58 | 14 |
| One other alternative I haven't seen mentioned is
for you to drop a flexible pipe/hose into the well and
run it to the outside. Then hook it up to a gas powered,
self-priming agricultural pump. Since washing cars and
watering lawns is seasonal around here, the 3hp Briggs
makes the same noisse as a lawn mower & fits right in.
You can pick one up (I did) in Worcester at a place
called washburn & Garfield. I'm using it to water my lawn
using the nearby swamp as a h2o source. (Don't tell the
conservation commission ok? ;^)
Cost was about $150.00
|
58.238 | Dirty well water.... | FIDERE::NAMOGLU | Sheryl Namoglu : VMS Development | Fri Jun 24 1988 10:50 | 23 |
|
Yesterday, I lost power in my house for about 6 hours. When I
got home last night, it was restored. I merrily started doing
dishes, which involved running the dishwasher. After the diswasher
completed, I went and filled my dog's bowl up with water, well
the water was dirty! It looked like something I would get from
the bottom of a pond.
I have a well, don't know how deep it is though (I am sure it is
written down at home somewhere). I have had the house about 1
1/2 years, and never had this problem before. Is this because my
well is low? The water was fine this morning, even after a shower.
Is there anything I should look at or fix?
Is this common?
Any help would be appreciated.
Sherry
ps. couldn't find any previous topics that seemed appropriate.
|
58.239 | | CHARON::DCOX | Try? Try not! Do, or do not. | Fri Jun 24 1988 12:16 | 4 |
| This is not an uncommon symptom of a well that has been zapped by lightning.
Usually, though, it does a number on the pump as well.
Dave
|
58.240 | nothing to worry about | PSTJTT::TABER | Touch-sensitive software engineering | Fri Jun 24 1988 12:27 | 16 |
| Hi Sherry,
Usually that means that something happened (and power out
qualifies) that caused the column of water in your well pipe to drop
back down to the level of water in the well. In the process of doing
that the water stirs up the guck in the bottom of the well. It could
take a couple of days to settle again.
Generally there is a check valve somewhere that should prevent
this happening, but they fail over time. Also if you had the sprinkler
running or some other valve open in the system when the well pump cut
out, it could be a contributing complication.
In any case, although it looks nasty, it's generally harmless.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
58.241 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Jun 24 1988 14:59 | 9 |
| It's almost certainly just rust and crud that got stirred up
in the well, in the pipe from the well, in your pressure tank,
wherever. All the crud reaches a very delicate steady-state
condition, and it doesn't take much to knock it loose. Almost
anything out of the ordinary in the water system can do it.
This happens in cities when they flush the hydrants. Just let
the water run until it's clear. You may need to clean the aerator
screens on the faucet spouts (assuming you have them), if you got
a lot of crud and the screens got clogged up. They just unscrew.
|
58.242 | Happens to everybody | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Mon Jun 27 1988 09:48 | 7 |
| It happens to us every time we have a power failure. Just run the
water until it clears. You may also want to clean the filter
screens on your washing machine or dishwasher. It's just the
sediment in your well; it's harmless.
pbm
|
58.447 | recommended well pump sizes? | MEMORY::BIRO | Larry Biro | Thu Jun 30 1988 12:20 | 17 |
|
What are reasonable sizes (horsepower) for deep well water
pumps? I'm in the process of building a house (well hasn't
been dug yet) and the builder is planning to provide a 1/4 hp
Gould pump. This seems on the small side to me. What are the
suggested pump sizes and is there much of a cost difference
between various sizes?
Also, the tank sizes used in new construction now seem to be
consistently smaller than those used 10-20 years ago. Most
of the ones used today seem to be in the 20-40 gal range.
Any reason why?
This is for a 3 bedroom house. We also do a fair amount of
gardening (lawn watering etc).
Larry
|
58.448 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Thu Jun 30 1988 13:42 | 5 |
|
RE: .8
My well is 200' and I have a half-horse submersable pump.
I wouldn't want any *less* pressure than what it provides.
|
58.449 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Jun 30 1988 14:19 | 7 |
| Motor size required depends on how deep the well is. 1/4 hp won't
handle a very deep well; how deep are the wells in your neighborhood?
A pump-supply place should have a table that tells what size motor
you need for a given depth of well. My pump is 200' down and is
1/2 hp; as I recall, that was about the limit for 1/2 hp. Anything
deeper and I'd need a larger motor.
|
58.450 | Don't reinvent the wheel | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Thu Jun 30 1988 15:56 | 9 |
| Re .8
Gould publishes a selection chart to enable you to match well to
pump and to tank pressure. For example, my 180 foot well with a
1/2 hp pump and 20 psi tank pressure will deliver 230 gallons/hour.
The chart should be available at any Goulds dealer.
pbm
|
58.451 | how's this for timing? | MEMORY::BIRO | Larry Biro | Fri Jul 01 1988 09:10 | 4 |
| The well may be drilled as early as today... I should
have the information I need (well depth) shortly.
Larry
|
58.243 | You All DRINK that water? | CPRS::LAPERLE | What is Life without a DREAM? | Wed Jul 06 1988 09:52 | 27 |
| Hi Sherry,
I'm no expert on well's because I live in the city.
I was reading your note and all the replies. Wells..... They all read
like they are yuky. I read words like..... Rust, sediment, yuk,
pipe build up. Most of them recommended you clean the screen. What
about the particles and unseen things that get through the screen?
You all drink this very day? Wow. Although I'm sure
all you folks have advantages to city water. Well water is not
treated like city water is. But is it as good, better, or worse?
Is it tested for Pesticides, Fertilizers. Do any of you live near
a farm or land fill?
Our most valuable resource. Is it really that safe?
Please don't misunderstand me I'm not putting down wells or
the water in them. I was just reading these notes, and expressing
my thought. I have been doing some research on the water problems
in the U.S.. Because of some of the things if have found is what
made me reply. Believe me the city water is not good. I have a Water
Treatment System. It's great! For two reason..... 1.) The water
tastes great, 2.) I feel safer knowing that it is clean.
Have a great and I hope your well has settled down by now.
Richie Laperle.
|
58.244 | What do you do with the MDC water that we send you? | CHART::CBUSKY | | Wed Jul 06 1988 11:11 | 38 |
| > You all drink this very day? Wow. Although I'm sure
> all you folks have advantages to city water. Well water is not
> treated like city water is. But is it as good, better, or worse?
> Is it tested for Pesticides, Fertilizers. Do any of you live near
> a farm or land fill?
Well water IS tested, when a well is first drilled, in conjunction with
a house sale and with mortgage refinancing. It it also a good idea to
have it retested on a periodic basis. Well water is generally NOT
treated because IT DOESN'T need to be!
As for "city" water, if you live in the greater Boston area served by
the MDC water, I can tell you a few things about the water that you
use. I live less than a � mile from the Wachusett reservoir (which is
where they pump the water from that they to send you).
Ground water from my neighbor hood and many others eventually drains
into the reservoir. Let's hope my septic system is working properly and
that I don't use to much fertilizer on my lawn!
The reservoir itself is circled by routes 140, 110, 62, and 70 and in
many places these roads cross the reservoir or are so close that if you
were to jump over the gard rail on the side of the road you'd end up in
the water. Rain water washes all the dirt, grime and oil slicks off the
road and into the reservoir. Let's also hope that there are no major
accidents involve tank trucks and/or hazardous waste!
There use to be two gas stations less than � mile from the reservoir,
these were both closed when one of them discovered a leaking
underground gas tank.
Do I live near a landfill? NO, but there is one in WestBolyston, RIGHT
across Rt 140 from the reservoir.
And, about two weeks ago, someone crashed a helicopter into the
reservoir, it only took them 4 days to find it and pull it out!
Charly
|
58.245 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jul 06 1988 12:25 | 4 |
| Rust won't hurt you. Sand and gravel won't hurt you. Mud won't
hurt you. And in a good well there aren't any harmful bacteria.
The crud and sludge (purely a temporary condition) doesn't LOOK
very good, but it's totally harmless.
|
58.246 | All better.. | FIDERE::NAMOGLU | Sheryl Namoglu : VMS Development | Wed Jul 06 1988 13:23 | 9 |
|
My well has settled down by now. It is nice and clean again.
Your replies did make me relax though. I have had the power go
out before with no side effects on the water, so I probably would
not have guessed that was the problem.
Thanks for the help
Sherry
|
58.803 | Noisy Well Controller or valve | NAC::CLOUTIER | Good is the enemy of Better.. | Wed Jul 06 1988 17:50 | 31 |
| I could't find anything on this particular topic. If there is,
I will delete the note!!
I have well water at my house. The well is 680 feet deep, and
the pump is set at 600 feet. The installation is 3 years old.
At the house, is the tank (30 gals., shut off, etc).
When the installation was new, everything ran silently. However,
as time progressed, a noise developed, which sounds like a
rattle. There aren't any motors or anything, and the relay is
not chattering.
The noise appears to be coming from some sort of valve (perhaps
a one way?) installed just before the tank. The setup is:
tank
|
| [relay]
--- Pipe from well -------|=== mystery valve ==|---|----||---->
Does anyone have any experience with this?
The sound is getting pretty annoying.
Regards,
Steve Cloutier
|
58.247 | Well, it's like this... | LEDS::LEWIS | | Wed Jul 06 1988 19:27 | 36 |
|
re: .5
>> Wells..... They all read
>> like they are yuky. I read words like..... Rust, sediment, yuk,
>> pipe build up. Most of them recommended you clean the screen.
>> What about the particles and unseen things that get through the screen?
I haven't seen any junk coming out of my well, and the water tested
fine three weeks ago, and it tastes great (actually it doesn't taste,
which is the way I like it). When did the city last test your water,
and do you know what the results were?
>> Well water is not treated like city water is.
Treated with what, and why should it need to be treated?
>> But is it as good, better, or worse?
>> Is it tested for Pesticides, Fertilizers. Do any of you live
>> near a farm or land fill?
At least I know where my water is coming from and can see if something
is happening locally to contaminate it. Your "well" is 100 miles away!
>> Believe me the city water is not good. I have a Water
>> Treatment System. It's great! For two reason..... 1.) The water
>> tastes great, 2.) I feel safer knowing that it is clean.
So how can well water be any worse? I may buy a filter system
too, just as a safeguard between water quality checkups, but it
sounds like you KNOW your water is bad. My water goes through about
200' of pipes to get from the ground to my sink. Yours goes through
miles. Did they use any lead solder on those pipes? Any rust or
cracks or other contamination to worry about? I'll take the well.
Bill
|
58.248 | water utilities have to meet Federal standards. | PSTJTT::TABER | Touch-sensitive software engineering | Thu Jul 07 1988 10:18 | 26 |
| > When did the city last test your water,
> and do you know what the results were?
The cities of Revere and Winthrop (Mass) test weekly. The NH Public
Utilities Commission required my family's water company to test monthly
-- more often if there was any reason to suspect the water might be
getting fouled. I would expect the schedule is common: most major cities
weekly and most towns or private utilities monthly. Note that there is
no need to enter your house to get a reading on water quality.
The most current analysis is available by contacting your water
department.
The general thinking in the water industry is that if you're hooked to a
utility, then most home filtration/treatment installations do more to
provide peace of mind than any protection. If anything harmful gets
past the central treatment facility, it's unlikely that a home
installation will clean it up. They can remove sediment and certain
upleasant odors, none of which are harmful.
If you're hooked to a well, and the water needs more serious treatment
than softening or iron removal, then you're in deep sneakers.
As to the rest... it's probably best not to let this topic heat up.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
58.249 | What chemicals do we drink? | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Thu Jul 07 1988 13:52 | 12 |
| Water in Boston Metropolitan District tastes like cucumbers or seafood,
all because of algae in Wachusett resevoir. Wells don't grow algae,
at least. You never really find out all the chemicals they drop
into the reservoir and the aqueducts.
In Gardner I get my water from wells and a local reservoir. In
November the city told me the choloform bacteria count for SEPTEMBER
was higher than the legal limit. Heckuva lot I could do about it
at that point.
Elaine
|
58.804 | Vibrations caused by the pump | WILKIE::GOETZ | | Thu Jul 07 1988 16:58 | 11 |
| re. .0
That "mystery valve" is your check valve. It's function in life
is to prevent water from draining back into the well.
The rattling sound you describe is probably caused by vibrations
from the pump.
I occasionally have the same noise. Sometimes it happens, somtimes
it doesn't. Can't say how to prevent it.
|
58.805 | I have a noisy one too!!!! | CLYPSO::HARTWELL | Dave Hartwell | Fri Jul 08 1988 17:30 | 10 |
| I have a deep well, about 600 feet.... I have the same problem...
since the day it was installed. The first valve was so noisy that
I had the well company replace it after 3 weeks. The new one is
better but still noisy..... I suggest you either live with it
or perhaps find a way to deaden the rattle
Dave
|
58.250 | Questions | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Jul 12 1988 19:19 | 22 |
| Actually with most well water you can't see the local sources of
contamination, because most wells these days (I believe) are deep
wells. So the Wachusett Resevoir gets my ground water runoff, but
I get ground water runoff from miles away that eventually seeped
down deep enough to reach my well.
But as a neophyte well owner, I have two questions:
1) The waste line for flushing out my water filters (to remove iron
and manganese) connects right into my main sewer line, without an air gap.
The instructions that came with the units say there should be an air gap
to avoid the possibility of siphoning sewage into the water filter.
Just how serious is this - should I get it fixed *instantly*, is it
something to fix eventually, or is this probably not important?
2) I went down in my basement one day and found water leaking out of
the hole in my basement wall where the well pipe comes in. I haven't
yet figured out if this only happens when the pump is running or whether
that was a fluke. Does this sound like the pump pipe is broken?
Thanks,
Larry
|
58.808 | Does Hydro Fracting Wells Really Work??? | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Jul 13 1988 09:35 | 33 |
| I know this was mentioned in a couple of other well related notes
but I would really like to get more info on this subject of Hydro
Fracture. This past week my neighbor brought in Green Mt. Well Co.
to drill another well. His existing well yielded less then 1 GPM
and was down over 500 ft. This well company guaranteed at least
1/2 GPM within 300 ft of drilling. He was taking a high risk but
he said he had to do something and drilling his well deeper was
not recommended because it had been dynamited and had caved in to
about 400', where his present pump is positioned. Green Mt. did
drill another well down to 300' and it was dry as a bone. They then
pulled the drilling rig out and sent in the HydroFrac crew and they
HydroFracted the well, starting about 30' up from the bottom and
continued re-HydroFracting every 30' until they were about 20' down
below the casing. The bottom line is that the next day the well
was yielding a solid 2 GPM. I was impressed because I truely believed
this was going to be a dry well. As a result, I am considering having
my own well HydroFracted but would like more input from you well
owners who have had the process done. My well is 350' down and had
been installed with the old cable pounder type rig. my yield is
about 1 GPM and I would like it to at least double. Can those people
who have had HydroFracting done, or know about the process please
comment on the following:
1. What are my chances for a substantial increase in my well's yield?
2. What kind of before and after results have you had on existing
wells?
3. Who might you recommend or am I wasting my money?
Thanks in advance!
Bill D.
|
58.809 | 1 gpm doesn't sound like enough. | WFOVX3::KOEHLER | If it rains, put the top up | Wed Jul 13 1988 09:56 | 6 |
| re.0 What is Hydro Fracting? I have never heard of this operation
in my area of Mass. I had my well drilled in 1965 (very dry year)
and it yielded better than 12 gpm. It is only 265 ft. deep.
Jim
|
58.251 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jul 13 1988 10:34 | 13 |
| My guesses/opinions:
You ought to fix 1) sometime, preferably sooner than later, but
I wouldn't say you have to take the afternoon off and rush home
to do it. The flush line for my water softener runs into the
sink in the basement; that's an easy way to get an air gap, which
you might be able to use.
Re: 2), was it raining at the time? I would guess that it was just
groundwater, leaking through the wall around the pipe. If it happens
only when the pump is running then I'd get mighty suspicious, but
I think it's more likely that it has nothing to do with the well
pipe. More observation and deduction is in order to make sure.
|
58.810 | I've heard it works | FRAGLE::STUART | | Wed Jul 13 1988 10:49 | 14 |
|
to answer .1 Hydro Fracting to my knowledge is drilling to a certain
depth and then going out to the side in a given radius, what this
does is hits numerous vains instead of just one vain. In areas where
water is scarce you need multiple vains to get enough water.
to answer .0, I have a friend that could only get .5 to 1 GPM until
they Hydro fracted and now he gets 3 GPM. He swears by it.
I was lucky, my well yielded 10 GPM at 200'.
good luck
Randy
|
58.811 | Bill - did you see note 1228? | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Jul 13 1988 12:41 | 14 |
| This note has been temporarily write-locked pending approval of the author.
To the author: This subject is already under discussion in this file, under the
topics listed in the title. Please look at these notes; you may find that your
question is already answered, or you may find a note where your question would
be an appropriate continuation of the discussion. These topics were found
using the keyword directory (note 1111), and you may find other notes relating
to this subject by examining the directory yourself.
If for any reason, after examining these notes, you wish to continue the
discussion here, send me mail and this note will be un-writelocked immediately
and without question.
Paul [Moderator]
|
58.812 | OK To Give Your Results! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Jul 13 1988 14:40 | 4 |
| I check with the moderator and got the OK to release. So anyone
who has had the Hydro Fracture procedure preformed on a well, please
let me know the results. Thanks!
|
58.163 | IRON FILTER UNIT or WATER SOFTENER? Which? | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Thu Jul 14 1988 15:22 | 14 |
| I just wanted to re-activate this discussion as it seems that we
never really got to a single conclusion:
Given that the water supply has AN IRON problem, it seems that
two different methods were recommended in previous replies:
1. WATER SOFTENER
2. IRON FILTER UNIT
Are both solutions interchangeable? What is the cost differential?
Mark
|
58.164 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Jul 15 1988 10:22 | 9 |
| I got a water softener. If I were to do it again I think I'd get
an iron filter unit. The water softener works, but it really
isn't designed to take out iron, it's designed to take out calcium/
lime. I don't really like the fact that I'm putting about 5 pounds
of salt every 6 days into my septic tank, either. According to
the guy who pumped my septic tank the salt won't hurt it, but I
have a suspicion that the salt is why the ash tree at the side of
my leach field is dying. I don't believe the iron filter units
require any salt or other chemical.
|
58.165 | Filter and softener | TOLKIN::GUERRA | | Fri Jul 15 1988 12:41 | 7 |
| I have both a filter and a softener. We have calcium, manganese,
etc. plus iron particles (mining anyone?). The filter works good,
but the amount of particles is so high I have to change it every
three or four months. If I just rinse it out, I start seeing rust
stains in the dishwasher, the bathtub and all other fixtures because
it gets impregnated with iron. We can tell when it needs to be
replaced, because our water pressure goes way down.
|
58.166 | Nooooo problem | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Fri Jul 15 1988 15:22 | 10 |
| Re .23
Four months between filter changes is quite normal; we have the
same setup. Our plumber, who installs larger systems commercially,
told us that in a typical restaurant installation in the southern
New Hampshire / northern Massachusetts area, it is typical to change
the filters once a WEEK. And that's for the ICEMAKER only!
pbm
|
58.167 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jul 18 1988 09:42 | 4 |
| Filter changes??? I've heard of iron filters that have automatic
backwash, etc., and don't ever need changing (in theory?). Of course,
the automatic jobs cost in the neighborhood of $1000. Are you talking
about something simpler and cheaper?
|
58.168 | | TOLKIN::GUERRA | | Mon Jul 18 1988 12:48 | 10 |
| Re .25
Yep! Almost any halfway decent hardware store will have them. They
can also be found at Spags (of course!) and at Sears. It's just
a heavy duty plastic canister inside which you put the filter. These
are usually connected after your pressure tank and before the water
softener. It is also a good idea to have a shut-off valve after
the filter so you can remove the canister for cleaning without getting
soaked with the water flowing back from the house. And of course,
this assumes you have a shut-off valve at the tank that you can
close to stop flow of water from the well.
|
58.169 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jul 18 1988 14:57 | 5 |
| Oh - those. I've got one. It didn't do *ANYTHING* about eliminating
the iron in my water. It does take out the miscellaneous sand and
gravel and solid rust particles, but the real problem (for me) is
the dissolved iron in the water; those kinds of filters can't deal
with dissolved iron.
|
58.170 | Sears had a Potassium Permangenate Unit on SALE! | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Tue Jul 19 1988 00:21 | 15 |
| Well, I went to Sears to get their product prices and to get one
of their FREE water test kits. Actually, both goals were satisfied.
The Test Kit, IS FREE, and is actually performed by a reputable
lab in St. Paul, MN. I put it in the MAIL this morning.
They also had their IRON filter which uses the Potassium Permangenate
refill to remove about 20-25 ppm clear or red water iron. (Do not
confuse this with an earth/sand or activated charcoal device.) Well,
I put one of the units 'on hold' pending the results of the test.
The sale price was 339.00 (down from 400).
Mark
I will wait and see...
|
58.171 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Tue Jul 19 1988 01:27 | 53 |
|
Filters that take out dissolved iron and manganese require the
addition of an air injector which permits a controlled amount of
air to be added to the water *before* the filter. The iron turns
to rust and is then extracted from the water by the filter. There
are many factors to determine what size unit you need including,
water psi and flow rate. The trick is to match the capacity of
the iron filter to the water variables in your house, as close as
possible.
For instance, my well pump delivers 5 gpm. Most of the filters
I found available in my area were designed to be operated at 3 gpm.
If I were to use this filter without reducing water flow, I would
not get the full filtering capacity of the filter since the input
water flow is more than the effective filtering capacity, (regarding
flow rate) that the filter can handle. I could have reduced the
flow rate, but I liked the flow and pressure that was produced by
the pump. If anything, in this situation, you would want to buy
a filter that had a greater flow capacity than the pump delivered,
by which the water would be filtered *more* than required. Luckily
I did find a company that made a 5gpm filter. It cost $550 whole-
sale and was retailing for over $900. I was lucky to get it at
the wholesale price and installed it myself, so I saved some serious
money.
The filters that I looked at had 3, 5, and 7 gpm flow rates.
The greater the flow rate, the larger the filter and the greater
the cost. The filter comes with two chemicals, (I have no idea
what they are but potassium permeagate or whatever it was that
was mentioned a few notes back sounds familiar) one is white,
and one is black. I don't know too much about chemicals but
the black stuff seemed to be nothing more than fine activated
charcoal.
My opinion on the whole filter is that the price is a rip-off
no matter who you buy it from. The entire filter consists of a
simple tank about five feet tall, 10 inches in diameter, with
two chemicals inside. No moving parts except for the timer which
controls the backwash cycle. I backwash mine every other day.
It sort of looks like a big scuba tank. The chemicals never wear
out (supposedly), and no maintainance involved unless the timer
should break. Does it work? Yup! Was it worth it? Anything
is worth getting rid of those crappy rust stains, but considering
the technology involved with the device, these guys are making a
killing! (my opinion of course)
One interesting thing. Most water softeners have a cylin-
drical tank similar to the iron filter. The chemicals for the
iron filter are available separately, so I believe it is possible
for a person with a water softener with an external cylindrical
tank, to convert it to an iron filter just by changing chemicals.
Water softeners work on LOW iron contents, but if you've got
high iron levels, you've got to get the iron filter. One other
thing, when you get your water tested, have it done at an inde-
pendent lab that does not promote or sell, water treatment
devices. It's the only way to be sure your getting an accurate
reading.
|
58.680 | Just went through the support issue... | JAWS::COTE | feelin' kinda hyper... | Tue Jul 19 1988 16:09 | 15 |
| I recently woke to the sound of my well pump running at 5:00
A.M. A quick look verified that it was indeed leaking like a
sieve. We're not talking drips, this was a major flow of water
like from a faucet.
I took the pump back to the MANUFACTURER, Fairbanks Engineering
in Worcester. They not only COULD fix the 25+ year old unit
but did so in less than 30 minutes. (Blown seals.)
Take a 25 year old pump back to Sears and see if they'll even
admit they sold it...
Edd
|
58.172 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Jul 19 1988 17:43 | 62 |
| >< Note 845.29 by SMURF::WALLACE "Life's a beach, then you dive!" >
> ... it is possible
> for a person with a water softener with an external cylindrical
> tank, to convert it to an iron filter just by changing chemicals.
I'm niether a chemist nor a water quality expert, but I'd be
seriously scared about drinking water that came through such a
"modified" system unless the modification had been engineered by a
chemist and water quality expert.
If I understand it that 'tank' on your water softener contains the
chemicals that take the hardness out of the water. Its not a
filter, but a chemical (catalyitic?) process. My best guess is
that your modification would not soften and would only filter iron
until it clogged up. I doubt that the water softener re-charge
process would properly back-flush the filter.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Our well has hard, acid water with iron bacteria. We went through
the Sears anaysis and we now have the following. 1) A solution
feeder wich feeds a mixture of chlorine (liquid bleach) and acid
neutralizer. (Yes, I know that chlorine in solution is acid. Don't
ask me how these two chemicals can co-exist. I said earlier that
I'm not a chemist!) 2) Next in line is a 40 gallon (approx) tank
which allows time for the water and chemicals to mix and react. 3)
This is followed by an automatic backflushing filter that takes
out the (now dead) iron bacteria. 4) Finally there is a water
softener with a special chemical feed to increas its tolerance to
iron. Ths addition to the water softner is there because we tried,
unsuccessfully, to do without the filter for a while. Between the
backwashing filter and the softener there is replaceable cartridge
filter. This is there primarily because I already had it so why
not? It is a good idea anyway because it filters when the other filter is
off-line backwashing.
The solution feeder, the backwashing filter and the water softner
are from Sears. I installed them. My total cost was around $1000
about 3 years ago. A functionally similar system from a commercial
water service would have cost at least $2000; perhaps as high as
$3000. I've had two problems so far. 1) the injection fitting
where the solution feeder attaches to the water pipe became
clogged after about 2 years. It looks like this is a 24 month
maintenance item. The fitting cost <$5 and tool about 1/2 hour to
replace. 2) One of the valves in the backflushing filter stuck
partly open about 3 weeks ago. I think it was stuck for at least
24 hours, possibly 2-3 days, at which point it made itself know by
some minor flooding in our basement. It cleared up by manually
recycling. I hope it stays cleared up!
With this type of system you should check the Cl and Ph of your
water more or less daily and adjust the solution feeder as/if
necessary. I actually check it about 1-2 times per week and daily
for 2-3 days when I make adjustments.
...all or which sounds like a real pain or like the joys of
country living, depending on your attitude. I hope my sharing this
will help someone else. One word of caution. As I sort of hinted
at the beginning, your home water system is important. Bad water
can be a serious hazzard. If you don't feel comfortable with your
DIY capability in this venue, get professional help.
|
58.173 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Tue Jul 19 1988 23:39 | 18 |
|
RE: 845.30
Well, ok, hardness is definitely a factor for those who have hard
water, but many water softeners are sold for iron problems which do not
necessarily include hard water. For those who do not have hard water,
the modification *should* work, since the tank *does* definitely get back-
washed. An additional problem would be that you would want to make sure
that you no longer filled the salt tank, since that would cause complica-
tions by introducing salt to a system not designed for its use. Barring
those two things though, I see no reason why the conversion wouldn't work.
In fact, the service manual provided with my "iron filter" is actually a
"water softener" manual. The two are identical except that there is an
oriface on the water softener that allows the salt to be drawn into the
tank for regeneration of the chemicals, that is not on my iron filter,
because I don't need the salt nor do I have a salt container.
Of course, someone who does not feel comfortable with this idea
should not attempt it, but I believe a successfull conversion is possible.
|
58.174 | Water softeners and iron removal systems are similar | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Wed Jul 20 1988 09:34 | 22 |
| RE .29
Water softeners use an ion exchange column to replace the magnesium
and calcium in the water with sodium. Ca and Mg in the water make
it hard for soap to dissolve and hence the water is called hard.
Exchanging these ions with sodium leads to water that is softer.
After a while, depending on water flow and water hardness, the
sodium becomes depleted and you must add salt (sodium chloride)
to recharge the column. Keep in mind that the softening process
can yield water high in sodium that can cause high blood pressure
and is not too good for watering the plants.
Iron will be removed from the water as part of the softening
process. An system that is specifically designed to remove iron
will use a different ion exchange media, but the process is essentially
the same. I'm no expert but I think it would be possible to convert
a water softener to an specific iron removing system. Both water
softeners and iron removal systems work on the principle of ion
exchange, not filtering.
=Ralph=
(disclaimer: all above information is based upon chemistry classes
taken long ago.)
|
58.175 | REGENERATION not = BACKWASH | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Jul 20 1988 11:52 | 42 |
| >< Note 845.31 by SMURF::WALLACE "Life's a beach, then you dive!" >
> ... For those who do not have hard water,
>the modification *should* work, since the tank *does* definitely get back-
>washed.
I think you're wrong. The tank on a water softener does not get
"backwashed", it gets "regenerated". Yes, the difference may be
subtle (especially if you don't feed it salt) but it is NOT clear
that the water-softener "regeneration" cycle would properly
"backwash" a tank that had been modified to be a fliter.
>In fact, the service manual provided with my "iron filter" is actually a
>"water softener" manual. The two are identical except...
Hmmm... Now I'm beginning to wonder if I'm off-base? Frankly I'd
think that the different processes and chemicals used would
require different configurations. I wonder if this similarity is
typical of differing brands?
I also wonder how similar/dissimiilar the controls for the
"regeneration"/"backwash" cycle are? Are you sure that the
apparent similarities aren't meerly superfical? (i.e. similar
tanks and covers but different internals?)
> Of course, someone who does not feel comfortable with this idea
>should not attempt it, but I believe a successfull conversion is possible.
As with all DIY its important to watch out so that one doesn't get
in over one's head. In this particular case I'm not certain the
conversion is as straight forward as suggested. I also would be
concerned thet the converted unit might proove unreliable and/or
not remove as much iron as you need removed. As I intimated above,
I'm suspicious that the internals of these units have subtle but
significant differences. If your right you'll save yourself maybe
$3-400 less the cost of the replacement chemicals/filter material
for the tank. (I hope I'm in the balpark on those $'s.) I'd spend
the extra money to be more sure that my water system would
function safely and reliably.
If you atually undertake this conversion I'd surely like to know
about your results.
|
58.176 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Jul 20 1988 12:00 | 11 |
| .32 was entered while I was entering .33, and the information in
.32 seems to make the possiblity of conversion somewhat more
optimistic. I didn't not know that the iron "filter" was an ion
exchange; I though it was a chemical precipitation followed by a
mechanical filter.
HOWEVER I stand by my concern that the regeneration processes for
the iron filter and the water softener may be incompatibly
different.
Anyone have more/better info?
|
58.177 | Conversion is possible | YOGI::GOODMAN | | Fri Jul 22 1988 10:18 | 21 |
| When I moved into my house two years ago there was an existing water
softner. I felt uneasy about the condition of the water and the
pipes since the dishwasher was rust brown and not white with the
cute blue speckles. I had the water tested and found out that there
was a very high level of sodium in the water along with magnesium
and calcium. I consulted with the local water expert, Commonwealth
Water Purification Company, in Winchendon, MA. They suggested getting
rid of the Sodium backwash system and installing something to deal
with the magnesium and calcium. The price they quote was around
$1200. Money was very tight. I suggested using the tank and timer
from the existing system. He agreed to do this and cut the price
in half. The process included emptying the tank, putting in new
chemicals and adding some additional holding tanks. We were able
to clean out the pipes from the layers of rust. The purpose of
a water softner is to soften the water it does remove some but not
all the rust.
I test the water every year and am able to drink the water except in
the spring when the water table is very high and in summer when the
water table is very low.
|
58.66 | Bleach a well anyone? | NCVAX1::BLACK | just hanging around ... again | Mon Aug 08 1988 09:12 | 13 |
|
Not to flog a dead horse (so to speak) BUT I am new to well ownership
and have the sulpher smell problem. I have had a variety of suggestions
and have read through well related stuff here. I keep getting
references to chloronation (sp?) and super-chloronation. There must
be an expensive chloronator but I have also heard of 'bleaching'
the well on an annual basis. This is just what it suggests - dump
10 gallons of bleach in the well, let set (24 hrs? 48 hrs?) then
run enough water that this clears out.
Anyone ever tried this??
|
58.67 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Aug 08 1988 10:29 | 29 |
| re: .30
10 GALLONS!??? Gawd, no! Maybe 1/2 gallon. More likely a quart
would do it. You don't need much. Probably you don't need to
do it at all. You'd need to do it only if you have a bacteria
problem, and you probably don't. In any case, it won't do a thing
for sulphur.
Your first step should probably be to get your water tesed to see
what you've got. I've used Rietzel Labs in Boylston, Mass., and
there are others around. Rietzel will give you sample bottles and
directions on how to take samples if you stop by their lab - probably
other places will too.
But more on bleaching a well, if you've got bacteria. There's a
formula for how much bleach to use based on the volume of the well,
but if you add enough so you can just barely taste it, you'll have
plenty. Take the top off the well, and run a garden hose from your
outside faucet back into the well. Turn on the faucet, and dump
maybe 2 cups of bleach in. Let it circulate a while, and see if
you can taste it. If not, add a cup more. Notice that you have
to get away from the well and the bleach fumes for a while before
you try tasting it, or your smell and taste will be overpowered
by the fumes left over from dumping in the straight bleach. When
you've got an adequate concentration, let it circulate for a few
hours; use the hose to wash down the sides of the well pipe.
Then put the cap back on and let the well sit for a day or so before
you use the water. The first water out of the well after you do
this will probably be very rusty, because you'll have stirred up
all the sludge and crud on the sides of the well pipe.
|
58.69 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Aug 09 1988 11:00 | 11 |
| If you dump chlorine bleach into your well to "sanitize" it you
should run your water (perhaps out a hose?) untill it no longer
smells of chlorine before using the water. That gets rid of the
chlorine and of any thing in the water that was killed by the
chlorine. Of course this is after you've let the chlorinated well
sit for a while.
Getting your water tested is a good idea. Sears will do it for
free. Get a sample bottle at any sears and mail it in. You get a
good analysis plus suggestions for which sears treatment equipment
is recommended. You can choose to use their equipment or not.
|
58.178 | I *NOW* have great water. My story... | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Thu Aug 25 1988 12:07 | 25 |
| My new water test results were showing:
SLIGHTLY HARD (1.4 gpg)
CLEAR WATER IRON (2.6 ppm)
PH (6.6)
DISSOLVED MINERALS (13 gpg)
STABILITY INDEX (12.4) gpg = grains per gallon
ppm = parts per million
1 gpg = 17.1 ppm
For this I installed:
(in order of flow from input to output)
- PH NEUTRALIZER
- HIGH CAPACITY WATER SOFTENER (70 grains, totally electronic)
- PHOSPHATE FEEDER
The first corrects the PH to bring it to 7.0 by running it through
a bed of NUETRALIZER COMPOUND.
The second unit removes the hardness AS WELL AS the clear water iron
and the phosphate feeder neutralized the 'aggressiveness' (STABILITY
INDEX) of the water.
Outcome: JUST ABOUT PERFECT WATER! COST = ABOUT $1000 TOTAL!
Thought I'd share the results of my LONG journey... happy drinking!
|
58.179 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Thu Aug 25 1988 13:02 | 11 |
| I don't really know enough about these numbers to be able to interpret
them well. I wouldn't have thought that "slightly hard" required
any softening, unless there were visible problems. Our water test
came back with that indication, but the water lathers fine, and
there are no indications of hardness in the dishwasher or washing
machine. Likewise, I'd have guessed that a Ph of 6.6 was close
enough. Is it?
Could you explain what the stability index is all about?
Gary
|
58.180 | Water Softener is used to remove IRON. | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Thu Aug 25 1988 16:50 | 25 |
| Regarding the 'slightly hard water'- yes I really didn't need to
soften it at all, BUT, a water softener of the high capacity type
will not only soften, but it will REMOVE IRON. That is REALLY why
I installed the softener- to remove IRON and and residual hardness
as a side benefit.
You ask, "why didn't he use an IRON filter to do the IRON?"
1. I could do the IRON and HARDNESS with a softener.
2. The IRON filters are made to remove MUCH HIGHER concentrations
of IRON (about 20ppm) and as such, require a significant
expense and maintenance (adding chemicals, cleaning
etc).
As for PH, ABSOLUTELY! the difference between 7.0 and 6.6 is BIG
in water terminology. It will tend to make water taste 'funny'
but more important, WILL corrode house plumbing and produce
pin-hole leaks over many years. I opted to avoid that!
The phosphate feeder also addressed the corrosion element by actually
making a think coating on the inside of the pipes and fixtures.
Works just like they said it would.... perfect.
Mark
|
58.70 | I bleached it - and it works so far | NCVAX1::BLACK | just hanging around ... again | Fri Aug 26 1988 10:45 | 23 |
|
Regards .30 and following - I talked it over with a variety of well
owners then picked the solution that the guy I've known the longest
uses. Although his well is deeper, I used the same method he uses.
I dumped 10 gallons of Clorox down the well. I ran each and every
faucet in the house both hot and cold until I smelled clorox from
each (by the way yes that filled the HWH and yes I bypassed the
water softner). I then ran a loop from beneath the pressure tank
to the well and rinsed the well casing down then let the hose from
the same place run out on the grass until it got all the real gag
stuff out. I let it set until the next evening - about 24 hours.
I then ran the hose from below the tank until it no longer smelled
- ie the well itself was flushed of clorox. I then ran the outside
faucets until those lines were flushed. I then ran a hose from my
utility sink and flushed the HWH through that. None of the above
went into the septic of course. Once that was all clear I ran each
and every faucet on hot and cold until no clorox smell. And started
using the water for other than drinking. I used bottle water for
a few days. So far NO repeat of the sulpher smell at all and teh
water tastes better than it ever has.
If it comes back, I'll advise here.
|
58.181 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri Aug 26 1988 11:09 | 15 |
|
> 2. The IRON filters are made to remove MUCH HIGHER
> concentrations of IRON (about 20ppm) and as such,
> require a significant expense and maintenance
> (adding chemicals, cleaning etc).
The first part is right, but iron filters do not require
maintenance in the form of adding chemicals, cleaning, etc.
Just the opposite is true. Softeners are the ones that
require chemicals be replenished, namely salt. A true iron
filter only needs to be backwashed periodically, as does the
softener.
Do you have to add chemicals to your unit after certain
periods of time?
|
58.182 | All HIGH CAPACITY iron filter need Potassium Permangenate | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Mon Aug 29 1988 09:47 | 10 |
| RE: .39
EVERY hi-cap iron filter that I called about, saw in person, or was
recommended to buy REQUIRED backwashing and the addition of POTASSIUM
PERMANGENATE (a green/blue chemical). (High capacity means 20ppm
or above)
Maybe .39 was talking about a low-capacity iron filter?
Mark
|
58.183 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Tue Aug 30 1988 14:45 | 7 |
|
Well, mines rated for up to 20ppm which I thought was high
capacity since it was the only one I saw that even went up to that
amount. Most others were below 10ppm.
When you say "...addition of POTASSIUM PERMANGENATE", do you
mean consistently? Like at every backwash?
|
58.813 | Deep Well to Shallow Well?? | SALEM::CLEVELAND | | Tue Aug 30 1988 15:05 | 5 |
| I would like to know how to convert a deepwell pump into a shallow
well pump. The deep well has two lines going out, one for drive
and one for suction. Do you have to buy a special conversion kit
that changes it to just one suction line ????
|
58.814 | One pipe in and two pipes out. | MAY11::WARCHOL | | Tue Aug 30 1988 15:50 | 7 |
| My neighbor and I use a converted deepwell jet pump when we want
to lower the water level in his pond. (Don't ask why we do this)
All that seems to be changed on this pump is that the line that
feeds water back down the well to the ejector has been plugged on
the pump housing.
Nick
|
58.184 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Aug 31 1988 12:07 | 4 |
| I think the potassium permangenate filters are the "old" iron
filter technology. The air-injection approach is, I think,
fairly new and relatively uncommon. A lot of dealers may not
even know about it. Can anybody confirm or deny this opinion?
|
58.71 | Bleach the well run the washer.... | HYDRA::MBENSON | | Wed Aug 31 1988 18:03 | 11 |
| re .34
Hope you flushed out the washing machine as well... if you didn't
and ran a load of dark clothes ... no doubt you now know just what
bleach can do... I forgot the washing machine when I bleached my
"brand new" well ....( caught a lot of grass etc on the pvc when
we snaked that 400' line down the hole causing nasties in the water)
Good luck..
Matt
|
58.185 | iron, acid, moderately hard water combo | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Thu Sep 15 1988 18:15 | 38 |
|
My water has iron, low ph and is moderately hard. We did lots of research
and thought we found what we wanted in water treatment systems but the
general manager from the company we were going to go with turned out
to be a sleeze ball. They delivered the wrong system and when I talked
with him on the phone he told me we really need the system he
delivered (a water softener) plus a filter (what we really
ordered)...and he would give me a 'great' deal. He said if we use a
filter to eliminate the iron and neutralize the ph, the ph process
would cause our moderately hard water to become very hard.
Consequently, he said we need to use BOTH systems. He also said if we
only use the softener, we would lower the iron (not eliminate) and
lower the hardness but the process for the hardness would make our ph
even more acid. He said the too much acid would eat the pipes (I
knew this) and too much hardness would clog pipes (never heard this
before).
This guy was a piece of slime but has since been fired from the
company so I won't give a bad rap to them. I would write his
comments off as bulls**t, but I wonder. Was there any fact or was
it all fiction. The original sales guy who came to our house suggested
both units but we stated we'd only go with the filter. He never
mentioned we would cause the hardness to become worse if we went this
route. However, he was also pretty new to the job so maybe he didn't know.
Anyway, for those of you who have the same combination of water
problems as I, have you heard this story before? Has anyone heard
this story before? If we bought everything he suggested it was close
to $3,000. However, he had a special deal just for me and would have
given both for $1,600.
Even though the company fired the general manager, we decided not
to do any business with the company at all so we're back to where
we started.
Thanks,
Kathy
|
58.186 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Thu Sep 15 1988 22:22 | 5 |
|
Very hard water will clog pipes (very fast). Hard water also destroyes
hotwater tanks.
Mike
|
58.187 | For comparison | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Fri Sep 16 1988 09:44 | 25 |
| Re .43
We have mildly excessive iron, excessive "manganese" and "calcium".
The reason for the "" is that we actually have compounds of those
metals present, but the industry tends to refer to them by those
terms. SLIGHT hardness is actually beneficial to the copper piping;
it forms a protective layer on the pipe and prevents further
corrosion, much like what happens to aluminum exposed to air.
Excessive hardness is bad for water usage and for the pipes; but
it really has to be excessive to cause damage. I'm not quoting
numbers here because my reference stuff is at home.
It sounds like your situation is similar to ours. We have a
double sediment filter with replaceable cartridges, followed by
a conventional water softener (replaces the above compounds with
"sodium") which has worked very well for us. The main effect has
been that crud doesn't build up in the tubs, shower stalls, sinks,
and toilets, and we use about one half as much laundry detergent
as formerly. Cost about $1800 in the appropriate size for our
house and family, installed, with a bypass to the exterior sill-
cocks for watering the garden and other outside use.
pbm
|
58.188 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri Sep 16 1988 10:47 | 18 |
|
Kathy,
It's true that hard water will deposit material on the pipes, but
nobody ever gives figures for how long it would take x-amount of
restriction for x-amount of hardness. Depending on the levels
that you have, it may take 50 years to notice any difference at
all. Maybe you could post your water test results and those of
us who have already invested in these things could make a relation
between what worked and what didn't.
It sounds like the salesman gave you a real good price though. I
know when I was looking, companies wanted $1300 to $1500 just for
an iron filter. Even though the salesman was a jerk, it sounds
like you would have got a great deal. Of course, I say that not
knowing what capacity filter and softener you were quoted, nor
your water test results, so it's possible it may not have been
such a deal either. Any specifics?
|
58.189 | I have final Lab Results | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Tue Sep 20 1988 00:32 | 11 |
| Well, just to check out my 'water system' (see previuos note)
which was installed (by me) I sent a water sample to a water
testing Lab. Here are the results:
IRON: Orig : 2.6 Now: 0.2
PH Orig : 6.7 Now: 7.0
Hardness: Orig : 1.4 Now: 0.5
Stability: Orig : 12.4 Now: 10.0
I am satisfied! For about $1000.00 (total) I am in GREAT water!
|
58.190 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Sep 20 1988 10:08 | 7 |
| I don't see how any treatment system could INCREASE hardness of
water. After all, the water comes into your house with a given
amount of various things dissolved and/or suspended in it, and
I don't believe any water treatment you give it is going to ADD
anything to the water. Hard water will indeed clog up pipes over
time, but the rest of the salesman's spiel sounds to me like...a
salesman's spiel.
|
58.191 | | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Tue Sep 20 1988 17:33 | 33 |
|
Thanks for the responses. The feedback really helps.
The results for our water testing were:
Test Parameters EPA Max Results Units
--------------- _______ ------- -----
Acidity Value (PH) 5-9 6.4 SU
Hardness No Limit 53.7 mg/1
Iron .3 .29 mg/1
Manganese .050 .045 mg/1
Northeast Water Conditioning recommended we use an all purpose filter
for the iron and acid problem. Filter uses ferrite or manganese
green sand. 5 gpm backwash flow rate required with 20-12 psi water
pressure limits. For the hardness problem they recommended a water
refiner that featured 5-cycle regeneration.
Ideal is to get 1 system to eliminate as many nasties as possible -
without adding salt - or anything else, really - and as cheaply as
possible.
We started out just wanting to get rid of the iron but it turned
into a pandora's box type thing.
Given these added details, any recommendations?
Thanks again,
Kathy
|
58.192 | FYI - Consumer report on water filters... | NAC::WILSON | | Tue Sep 27 1988 10:57 | 9 |
| The consumer reporter for channel 5 is doing a report on water filters
Wednesday night on the 6:00 news (Paula Lyons). I'm not sure how
informative it might be but it may be of help to people that are
still trying to decide what, if, and how about filters. Hopefully
she'll also go over competive costs and functionality. Hope this
is of help to someone out their...
Chuck
|
58.193 | AF Water Conditioning Store | STAR::MALONEY | | Fri Nov 11 1988 13:47 | 11 |
|
Water from my new well tested low in pH and high in turbidity.
Several shops offered to sell me all-purpose filters for $700.
I showed the test results to the people at AF Water Conditioning in
Ayer, Mass. They said that the pH was not corrosive, and recommended
a $20 filter to clear up the turbidity.
I think there are a lot of crooks in this business. I recommend
that people have an independent lab run your water test, then
bring or phone the results to AF. They are on Route 111 in downtown
Ayer, 508-772-6773.
|
58.127 | What's about a well in the house? | PRGMUM::FRIDAY | | Fri Nov 11 1988 15:38 | 13 |
| Well, well, well.
We've got the same problem as .0 does (did?). The most
natural way to expand our house would bring the well inside
the boundary of the extended slab.
It's not clear from the discussion here what the resolution
ever was regarding having a well inside the house.
We live in Massachusetts, and have not yet talked to the
building inspector about our potential plans.
|
58.72 | More well woes. Water is yucky and it don't flow fast. | COORS::S_LEDOUX | AAAAAaaaaaHHHHHaaaaa...< Splat! > | Mon Jan 02 1989 14:30 | 50 |
|
Well :-), it's been a few months so lets dig :-) this topic out again.
We recently closed on a house with a well. This house was vacant for
at LEAST a year. Initially, the water smelled and looked like s**t.
Probably tastes as bad but dunno, we won't drink it. The water pressure
seemed really good. The bacteria test just came back and confirmed our
initial suspicions. There was coliform in an amount TNTC (too numerous
to count! [yeck-o!]). Along with the test results came instructions
for disinfecting the well with a 5% solution of clorox bleach (1 gal
clorox to 10 gals good water). Fine and dandy.
Now we're lining up somebody to check for contamination sources and
help us with the well but...Now the water looks alot better, ie, its
mostly clear and the smell isn't as offensive. We still won't drink
it. Since the water cleared up there's also been a change in the
water pressure. Now, when you turn the faucet on you get a good flow
for about 5 seconds and then it slows steadily down until it reaches
a level that I consider unsatisfactory and stays there. This happens
everywhere in the house. With an 82 gallon hot water tank, I could
take a shower at this pressure level for an awfully long time and the
water stays good and hot, it just don't come out fast enough for me.
We're still gonna disinfect and retest but we're wondering if there's
any relation between the quality of the water and the pressure that we
see inside the house. Could these things be related ? We have a pump
in the house that we set to come on at 50 and go off at 70. If you
look at the guage at any given moment its sitting at 60. A demand for
the water will lower the level (low pressure here) to 50 at which point
the pump will come on and the guage goes upto 70 and if the demand is
still there the guage will begin a slow cycle of 70->50->70-> again.
Does this relate ? or is there something else wrong ? I'm really used
to taking hurricane force showers and would like to do the same thing
with my well/pump system. Enough rambling, the questions I have are:
Is the initial grossness normal ?
Can quality be related to quantity ?
Is it normal for well systems to act this way (cycling, slow flow) ?
Any advice on what to check ? How to ?
We're really nervous because this is our first well system. Even on
city water we drank bottled water. False sense of security, I know,
but it tasted better. The doctors we talked to said don't worry about
the coliform but they don't have to wash people, dishes, clothes, etc.
with it.
Any help out there from those of you with well wells ?
Thanks.
Scott.
|
58.73 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jan 02 1989 17:47 | 21 |
| Yeah, you don't need to worry about the coliform; it's totally
harmless. It is, however, an indicator that other (bad) stuff
*might* be present.
At 50 psi, you shouldn't have any water pressure problems. You
may have crud in the pipes at some point that is cutting down
the flow, although it's not clear why you get an initial surge
of a good flow rate. If you haven't, try removing the filter
screens (if any) on your faucets and cleaning them out. Perhaps
put a hose on the drain for your pressure tank and let it flush
itself out. Turn off the water in the house, and drain all the
pipes...in other words, see if you can get rid of any crud in
the pipes, if there is any, and see if that helps any.
One thing you can do to perhaps localize the problem: if you
put a hose on your pressure tank drain, and find that you have
the same pressure drop phenomenon there, then you know the problem
is someplace between there and the well.
There may be crud in the bottom of the well that is blocking up
the pump intake. Lots of possibilities. Just keep looking. But
50 psi ought to be giving you all the water flow you want, unless
your water demands are really extreme.
|
58.74 | Did I put my water system in self-destruct mode ? | COORS::S_LEDOUX | AAAAAaaaaaHHHHHaaaaa...< Splat! > | Tue Jan 03 1989 08:06 | 18 |
| RE: < Note 439.37 by MTWAIN::WELLCOME >
Thanks,
Really, 50 psi is plenty ? Ooops. Last night I was playing around with
the pump and got it to come on 68 and go off at 85. Now the flow is
even faster and stays good and fast. You can wash your hands but if you
flush a toilet the pump comes on, but I can live with that. Did I do a
good thing or did I put my water system in emergency self-destruct mode by
cranking the pressure up ? My pump/tank is rated for 100 psi max. Can I
assume that if my pipes don't explode that I'll be okay ???
It's good to know that the coliform isn't killing us - just grosses you
out a bit...
Thanks again :-)
Scott.
|
58.75 | To much pressure is dangerous! | HAZEL::THOMAS | Rich Thomas | Tue Jan 03 1989 09:03 | 5 |
| Most water tanks are rated 100 PSI test pressure (when new) and 70 PSI
maximum working pressure. There should be a relief valve set at the max
working pressure in case the pump fails to shut off. Unless you have a
tank rated at 100 PSI working pressure, running your tank at 85 PSI is
dangerous. I wouldn't want to be anywhere near your house when it blows!
|
58.76 | Thar she blows! | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Tue Jan 03 1989 10:10 | 16 |
| If you have a typical deep well submersible pump and a pressure
storage tank, a fairly common operating cycle is: ON at 25 psi,
OFF at 60 psi. You're obviously 'way above that, possible cycling
the well pump too often and risking destroying the bladder in the
pressure tank. 85psi is uncomfortably close to typical 100 psi
maximum, especially on an older system.
There's no reason why you should not be able to take a "hurricane-
force" shower at a rate of about 3 gal/min, regulated by a typical
"water-saver" shower head.
If you think well water supply systems are fun, wait 'til you start
checking out your septic system.
pbm
|
58.77 | septic/well | LEDDEV::HASTINGS | | Tue Jan 03 1989 17:19 | 10 |
| Speaking of septic systems and wells... I had a friend that bought
a house with a well. The well was supposed to be an artesian well
but turned out to be a hand-dug well. It was about 11 feet deep
and was located about 15 feet from the septic system. It *did* cause
many health problems.
Do you know where your septic system is???? COuld that be the
source of your water contamination?
|
58.78 | No unusual heath problems.... | CSC32::S_LEDOUX | AAAAAaaaaaHHHHHaaaaa...< Splat! > | Wed Jan 04 1989 08:50 | 17 |
| < Note 439.41 by LEDDEV::HASTINGS >
> and was located about 15 feet from the septic system. It *did* cause
> many health problems.
>
> Do you know where your septic system is???? COuld that be the
> source of your water contamination?
I doubt if the septic is too near the well though I'm not ruling out
anything until I talk with both the well & septic people, have the
plumber look for any stray cross-connections, test the water for about
six months, etc.
I'm taking no chances with the water, will let everybody know...
Thanks.
Scott.
|
58.79 | Filter? | AKOV88::BROWN | Eight (cats) is not enough | Wed Jan 04 1989 12:23 | 12 |
| We had just about the same symptoms described (without the contamination,
phew) -- water came on just fine, then pressure dropped but the PSI looked
okay on the pump. To our total embarrassment it had an easy solution, it
was caused by our water filter being totally clogged up. I've never had
a house with a filter in the water-pipe so being told that this house had
such a setup didn't imply any action to me! The filter was so clogged with
iron that it looked like a brick cylinder -- replacing the filter solved
the problem, easy and relatively cheap. Any chance it's something that
simple for you?
Jan who_learns_more_with_each_disaster
|
58.80 | my car did that! | LEDDEV::HASTINGS | | Wed Jan 04 1989 12:53 | 14 |
| re: .43
I know it sounds unrelated but I had a problem with a car I
owned that had similar effects. The fuel filter was clogged. The
car would run great for a while then loose power and finally stall.
It seems that the clog would settle when the car was not in operation.
Once the car was started the clogging material would be carried
back into the filter and would resume blocking the flow of the
gasoline.
Your problem sounds similar. After removing the old filter I
would suggest putting a bucket under the filter port and flush a
few gallons of water out of the supply side of the pipe to clear
any left over material. This may prolong the life of the new filter
a bit.
|
58.81 | Gee, sounds like it could be easy. | CSC32::S_LEDOUX | AAAAAaaaaaHHHHHaaaaa...< Splat! > | Wed Jan 04 1989 13:01 | 8 |
| Filter ? That's the thingie that looks like a skein of yarn right ? :-)
My filter is contained in some kind of contraption with a red button on
top. I assume this red button doesn't mean danger, but pressure release.
Do I need to drain the tank to change a filter ???
Thanks.
Scott.
|
58.82 | Hey Abbott! | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Wed Jan 04 1989 14:20 | 19 |
| Re .45
You don't need to drain the tank, but you probably have a shutoff
valve on either side of the filter which you must close, or get
a 60 psi flood in your basement. Relieve the pressure on the
filter (maybe the red button?), unscrew it - probably an O-ring
seal - and change the cartridge. Naturally, you will obtain a
replacement cartridge first. Don't be tempted to run the system
without the cartridge, or several weeks from now you will have a
flood from your washing machine, dishwasher, or refrigerator ice-maker
when the solenoid valves jam open because of accumulated sediment.
If the sediment is bad enough, it will also jam push-pull mixing
valves in faucets.
A new cartridge will cost you less than ten bucks, probably less
than five.
pbm
|
58.452 | Well Pump On/Off Too Much | RICKS::PEKKALA | RICK PEKKALA, DTN: 225-7206 | Mon Jan 09 1989 19:55 | 19 |
| I have a well pump that turns on for about 1qt of water drained. If more
than 1qt is drained (from a shower, etc.) the pump turns on then off, on
then off, throughout the entire shower until it finally decides to stop.
The pump is relatively new and worked fine back in the summer. I have great
water pressure and an ocean of water when I need it.
People tell me that maybe the well tank hasn't any air in it. They say
that if it were the case, then the turn on/off of the pump would change,
due to the atmospheric conditions changing in the vacuum.
I've lost power since the summer, and have drained the system periodically
to replace an in-line water filter. I guess this could be when the air
that was in the system leaked out.
Can anyone confirm? Any other explanations? And most of all, how the heck
do you correct the problem before my motor fries?
Thx. rep
|
58.453 | Some suggestions | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue Jan 10 1989 09:04 | 14 |
| 1) The control might be mis-set or faulty. It might have the low
and high pressure limits set too close together.
2) The air supply is (should be) sealed from the water supply.
Draining the system would not normally let air out.
3) Turn off the well pump and see how long the water runs at a faucet.
It should go for several minutes before running dry. If it doesn't
then you may indeed have lost your air charge. You need a compressor,
pressure gauge, and a funny fitting to recharge it. Probably easiest
to call a well man who could probably do it for very little.
If you have enough pressure to run a faucet for several minutes
with the pump off, then I'd look at the control, not the tank.
|
58.454 | air pre-charge | SIXCAD::SITLER | | Tue Jan 10 1989 13:27 | 10 |
| re .0:
It sounds to me as though your system has lost its pre-charge of
air. Low air pressure will cause the fast-cycling behavior you describe.
Since air compresses much more readily than water, a given pressure change
will require a larger volume of water if it's air, and not the water itself,
that is being compressed.
See note 2853 (particularly .3 and .4) for instructions on how to
pre-charge your water tank.
|
58.455 | | RICKS::PEKKALA | RICK PEKKALA, DTN: 225-7206 | Wed Jan 11 1989 09:50 | 17 |
| Re. ALL
Thx. for your help. My tank was discharged and in consultation with a friend
of the family, he guided me through the steps.
What's interesting is that the reference notes that were just pointed out
mentioned that you must re-pressurize your tank. I didn't do that and it
worked just fine.
All I did was drain the tank and the air from the outside did the rest. When
I turned the pump back on, voila! No more problem. My pump turns on @30psi
and off @50psi. That's fine to me.
So, what's all that re-pressurizing the tank supposed to do that just letting
air into the tank won't do?
Thx. rep
|
58.456 | What pre-charge does | CADSE::ENGELHARDT | | Wed Jan 11 1989 13:01 | 26 |
| RE: .3
>All I did was drain the tank and the air from the outside did the rest.
>So, what's all that re-pressurizing the tank supposed to do that just letting
>air into the tank won't do?
It's a matter of how much water will be available each cycle and hence how
often your pump will cycle. It works like this: at the beginning, there is
atmospheric pressure (AP) in the tank (15# more or less). To reach 30# above
AP, the volume of air must be compressed (30+15)/15 = 3 times. Say you have a
60 gallon tank. The original 60 gal of air would be compressed to 20 gal.
When the pressure is increased to 45#, the volume of air will be:
60 x 15 / (45+15) = 15gal. Therefore the difference in volume between 30# and
45# is 5 gal (20-15). This is what can be delivered from pump-off (at 45#) to
pump-on (at 30#).
If the tank had been pre-charged with 30# when empty, the air volume at 45#
would be: 60 x (30+15)/(45+15) = 45 gal. Now the difference in volume is
15 gal. (60-45). I.e, your pump only runs 1/3 as often. It runs longer each
time, but that's better than running more often.
I know that these numbers aren't yours exactly, but I used ones that make the
arithmetic easy. The principle doesn't change.
Bob
|
58.457 | | RICKS::PEKKALA | RICK PEKKALA, DTN: 225-7206 | Wed Jan 11 1989 14:41 | 9 |
| Re. .4
Ok. That makes sense. The more AP, the less space available for water
in the tank, BUT the less times the pump turns on/off.
Interesting. What's optimal? I guess it depends on your tank size, and
your household requirments right (like kids in/out of showers, etc.)?
Thx. rep
|
58.83 | A little clorox does the trick... | CSC32::S_LEDOUX | Specialization is for insects. | Fri Feb 10 1989 09:43 | 17 |
| < Note 439.36 by COORS::S_LEDOUX "AAAAAaaaaaHHHHHaaaaa...< Splat! >" >
-< More well woes. Water is yucky and it don't flow fast. >-
You may recall the above note where I stated that I had both coliform
and bacteria in my well water test. The bacteria were "TNTC - Too
numerous to count", which is the 2nd worst it can be. The worst count
is "confluent", which to me means "bubonic plague" I guess. Well, I
dumped a gallon of clorox and 3 gallons of water down the well, waited
a few week and retested.
The good news is: The water is now fine...Perfect.
The bad news is: Last night some pipes froze and now my crawlspace
is full of perfect well water.... :-) Home ownership
is such fun!
Thanks, Everyone.
Scott.
|
58.194 | Sulfur in Well Water | MARCIE::SKLIMAS | | Fri Mar 17 1989 15:54 | 16 |
| I am looking for information on systems which will take sulfur
out of our water. Both the hot and cold water smell like rotten
eggs and we have a brownish yellow stain on tubs and toilets.
This is a new house in Groveland we built, and has well water.
We went to Sears and sent away for a water test and are still awaiting
the test results. Based on our description of the problem, the system
suggested by the Sears salesman had 3 seperate components and cost $1,000,
if we install it. It had something to do with putting chlorine into
the water and did not require much maintenance (which is what we
would like). Have not seen any notes on this yet.
Any information on types of systems and their cost would be
appreciated.
Susan
|
58.195 | SEARS is fine, but check around to compare | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, DSS & Integ'd Prd Mktg | Fri Mar 17 1989 16:47 | 18 |
| re: -1, take a look at their lab report. It probably will
show their chemical mixer and a 42 gallon holding/mixing tank.
Additionally, they may be adding in an IRON filter- the most
probable cause of the brown/yellow stains.
If you get away with $1000 (u instl it), with that type of
water you described, I would count my blessings and go with it.
If you prefer to go to another brand, it would probably end up costing
more and doing about the same- BUT, check around. What ever you
do, if you go to another supplier, make sure they are willing to
take back anything that THEY recommend if it doesn't solve the problem.
It tends to make them 'more responsible' about their suggestions.
(I am using SEARS equipment and find it works JUST FINE, no complaints)
Mark
|
58.196 | just love that smell in the morning ! | FRAGLE::STUART | it was a terrible vaxident | Tue Mar 21 1989 14:21 | 17 |
|
We have the same problem in Ashby Ma. We had the water tested and
it contained "acceptable" levels of hydrogen sulfide !! It was
explained to us that there are pockets of the gas in the ground
and the problem can dissappear as fast as it appeared ! I was
given a "verbal" quote of $300 - $500 for a charcoal filter system
with two filters, one designed for the gas and one for the iron.
The only thing was the filters cost about $25 apiece and depending
on the levels in the water may have to be changed monthly !!!$$$
In the long run the $1,000 sounds good for a "no maintenance"
system.
We buy bottled water and have begun to notice days that the odor
is almost unnoticable.
We dealt with Skillings and Sons in Hollis New Hampshire ...
ace
|
58.284 | ARSENIC in my water | PLANET::BETTENCOURT | | Thu Mar 23 1989 08:30 | 21 |
| Mr. Moderator- pls don't delete this note . I looked high and low
and couldn't find any discussion of this *important* topic.
I live in the boonies of Southern NH and have an artesian well
for a water supply to my house. I am attempting to sell my house
to relo and had to go thru the normal battery of test before sale.
Lo and behold my water test came back saying I have Arsenic in my
water. Guidelines for allowable limits are .05 MCL and my test
came back .059 MCL. I don't want *any* of this stuff in my water.
My concerns are for my pregnant wife and 3yr old. Are there filters
available to remove this crap? What are the different ways one can
combat this problem. I will retest the water to make sure. The
house/well is 10 yrs old and was built on old farmland. There is
no industry nearby and I'm baffled as what to do.
Any help out there?
Thanx
M.
|
58.285 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Thu Mar 23 1989 09:58 | 14 |
|
Arsenic, yuk, I wouldn't blame you for your concern.
The AMWAY filter will remove it. However, it's not really a whole house
type filter since it uses 3/8" lines and definitely causes a pressure
drop. I have mine on an auxiliary faucet in the kitchen, and use that
for making any drinks or cooking, etc. If you're only concerned with
ingesting the arsenic then this is a viable solution. The filter runs
around $300 with the aux faucet and the cartridge lasts about a year.
Good luck
CdH
|
58.286 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Mar 23 1989 13:05 | 10 |
| I'd be careful with just using a filter, though I admit to not knowing awhole
lot about thier effectiveness vs. the As concentration.
A friend of mine who's a chemical engineer and used to be in charge of health
& safety at HLO found arsenic in his well water. He told me the only effective
way for him to deal with the concentrations he had was to actually install a
still in his basement and brew his own distilled water - a filter would NOT have
been adequate for his needs.
-mark
|
58.287 | Filters seem to be a possibility | PLANET::BETTENCOURT | | Thu Mar 23 1989 17:14 | 19 |
|
.3 Technically your correct but the difference here is only .009mcl
(would that read 9 parts per *billion*).
I did some research and called the DEQE in Concord NH and an
engineer said something about a "reverse osmosis" filter which fits
under my sink and would be less expensive than distillation. A woman
at Cullinet filters said today she had a sale for those filters-----
---only $790 installed. OUCH!
.2 Iwould be very interested to know where you got your AMWAY filter
and if you would be kind enough to provide me with a number/address.
Good ideas so far... Anymore out there?
thanx.
M.
|
58.288 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Mar 23 1989 19:30 | 5 |
| Just as another comment, just because something is only 9 ppb doesn't
necessarily mean it's not much. There are chemicals that are out there that
will kill you in quantities measured in parts per trillion!
-mark
|
58.289 | Where | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Fri Mar 24 1989 11:42 | 10 |
| Here are two sources of information and quotations on methods to
fix the problem:
Policy Well & Pump, Salem, New Hampshire
WaterFixx Corporation, Manchester New Hampshire
Keep us posted, please.
pbm
|
58.290 | sears catalog & 2 hours | SVCRUS::KROLL | | Fri Mar 24 1989 21:24 | 9 |
| I just installed a unit I got from Sears catalog. total cost $400.
It sells for $350 and an extra $50 for extra pipes & fittings.
we installed it in 2 hours. they carry one type for clorinated
water and one for non clorinated water.
We dedided to go this route because the filters can be mail ordered
and the sears model cuts off the water when the tank is full. the
older model we have runs all the time and I have had trouble getting
a new membrane for it.
|
58.291 | Charcoal Canister Type Filter?? | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Mon Mar 27 1989 09:20 | 6 |
| What about those inexpensive canister type, taste and odor filters?
I believe they are activated charcoal membranes that remove numerous
chemical polutants. It appears as though your situation is borderline
as far as the need to treat. With this being the case, wouldn't
a $40 cartridge unit installed on the cold water supply to the kitchen
or even the whole house do the trick?
|
58.292 | Filters R' Us | PBA::BETTENCOURT | | Mon Mar 27 1989 13:46 | 25 |
|
.7
I, too, had first thought about that as well but, like radon
filters, once the filter has served its purpose it becomes a problem.
What do you with some *heavy duty* toxic waste now residing in this
cannister? I have made numerous phone calls and the principle of
reverse osmosis filter, altho expensive, seems to cover all the
bases.
Basically, an r.o. filter will run the water thru a particle
filter first then deposit the filtered water in a small tank where
the water is then pressurized and "forced" thru a membrane into
another holding tank as pure drinkable water. All contaminants such
as arsenic are trapped on the "pressurized" side and are subsequently
disposed of into the septic tank via a backflushing process (I assume).
The pure water is then transferred to the sink(s) via separate faucets
for consumption. This process makes about 12 gallons a day. The
filters and membranes last for 2-3 years before they are replaced.
It's alot of money (hence the shopping around/alternatives) but
I guess piece of mind doesn't come cheap!
I will keep people posted as to the final outcome.
M.
|
58.293 | everse osmois unit | SVCRUS::KROLL | | Mon Mar 27 1989 23:41 | 8 |
| re: 3108.6
this is a reverse osmois unit. because I am chemically sensitive
I change the charcole every 6 months instead of once a year like
they claim you should for a family of 4. we are 2.
replacement membrames $68. filters under $15 each. not bad in
my book.
|
58.296 | Radon in well water | SALEM::ANDREWS | Baldness - It's all in your head | Tue Mar 28 1989 14:56 | 19 |
|
This is more or less a poll to see if there is anyone else out
there with the same problem as myself. I've searching this notesfile
for topics on radon, but I did not find a subject on radon in
well water.
I'm currently selling my house (or trying to!), but after having
a radon test on my well water, I found that I have more than the
EPA recommended dosage.
Does anyone out there have any experience with water filters
connected to well pumps?
I've just started calling companies that sell and install filters
for radon contaminated water, and the first one I called had a system
for $3400!!!! Wow!! Boy, I need help fast!!
- John
|
58.297 | aeration | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Tue Mar 28 1989 15:00 | 4 |
| I seem to remember that one way to get radon out of well is aeration.
It might turn out cheaper that a filter.
Eric
|
58.298 | aeration = big bucks | SALEM::ANDREWS | Baldness - It's all in your head | Wed Mar 29 1989 09:53 | 15 |
|
Re: Eric
Yes, this process is called aeration. I've called two companies
so far, and both say the aeration system cost right around $3K.
I'll most likely go with the carbon type, which both these companies
sell, but do not recommend. Apparently the carbon process doesn't
always work, and not as well. But, the cost is $1100 compared with
$3K. Hey, I'm just trying to sell the house and get out. Why should
I take the blame for this radon, when it's been around since the
beginning of time? It's just not fair!
- John
|
58.299 | How's $400 sound? | VAX4::RUTZEN | | Wed Mar 29 1989 13:59 | 10 |
| Hi John,
I just ordered a filter that's supposed to remove aluminum, zinc,
lead, rust, a bunch of other stuff that I can't remember, and RADON.
It was through one of those promotional deals, but since there's
a money-back guarantee, I figure I'm safe. The cost was $400, including
shipping and handling. It doesn't filter the water supply for the
entire house, it's just for the kitchen sink. I can provide more
information if you want.
|
58.300 | Me too | MCNALY::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Wed Mar 29 1989 14:19 | 38 |
| We're in the same boat. There was a story that made the news (AP) a couple
weeks ago about a guy in Dunbarton, NH whose well water had the highest level
of radon ever recorded in NH, New England, the East or something. Well, he
lives across the street from us. Since that measurement (Nov? 1988) other
folks, also on our street, have recorded higher levels.
EPA says its maximum acceptable level of radon is 30,000 picocuries per
milliliter (I think that's the measurement). (I've also heard EPA wants to
lower that to 2,000!) Our water was tested at 497,000. Other folks on our
street recorded in the millions! The guy who made the headlines is treating
his water and it's now fine. I'll try to find out how he's treating it.
The water treatment outfit we bought our water softener from used to recommend
some radon-in-water treatment outfit in Laconia?, NH. This treatment, however,
introduced? uranium? or some other complication, making the result worse than
it was to start with. Our outfit is now in R&D on their own, affordable, fix.
Anyway, a lot of this above stuff is hearsay. Dunbarton officials are bringing
in some NH State geologists and radon specialists and treatment hucksters
next Wednesday (Apr. 5) for a town meeting/question&answer deal. I'll take
notes.
There's been a bit of discussion in this conference about whether radon is a
real problem or not. I have to wonder about our situation: people have lived
in Dunbarton, on the same wells that are now testing high in radon, to ripe
old ages. Have they survived mega-doses of radon? Did they never take showers?
On the other hand, no matter if you think radon is only the latest media craze),
when *YOUR* water is tested at 16 TIMES beyond what EPA recommends as being
healthy, there is some concern. And, as in .0, no matter what *YOU* believe,
the fact that banks and potential buyers consider it a problem _makes_ it a
problem.
I'll report back on anything I find out.
Oh, yes, another piece of hearsay about aeration (or any treatment) ...
What do you do with the waste? If you remove radon/iron/arsenic/whatever from
your water, then what do you do with it? I think this is part of what makes
it so expensive.
|
58.301 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Mar 29 1989 15:49 | 7 |
| re: filter for kitchen sink only.
I don't think this is very useful, as I believe that showering brings the
highest exposure to radon. As the water is sprayed in fine particles, the
radon escapes, creating a high concentration in the air in the shower stall.
Paul
|
58.302 | info from the DEQE | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Mar 29 1989 20:22 | 36 |
| A bit of data from the DEQE (Dept of Env Quality Engineering, if you
aren't from Mass), plus a personal opinion.
The normal dispersion rate of radon from water into the air is about
10,000:1. So if you've got 30,000 piC/l (pico-curies per liter) in your
water, it should add about 3 piC/l to your airbord radon level. While
it is in the water, it won't hurt you, it's only after it gets into the
air, attaches to a dust particle, and lodges in your lungs to irradiate
you with alpha particles that it increases your chance of getting cancer.
If you use a carbon filter, it concentrates the radon and becomes toxic
waste in its own right! I don't gather that there are regulations (yet)
for disposing of them, but I sure wouldn't want to deal with that problem
down the road. Maybe the people buying the house would accept a credit
for the amount of installing the carbon filter, and then they can make
the decision for themselves.
The aerator releases all that radon into the air... that's not a problem
because the concentration is always low, and it's radon that would have
made it into the atmosphere anyway, eventually. But presumably you have
to vent the aerator to the outside.
As to why people could live to ripe old ages with water that has 1M piC/l
of radon -- I can think of two big factors. First, houses used to be
pretty drafty -- if you heated with a fireplace, the air in the house was
all the time being sucked up the chimney. So a huge water radon level
might not have meant that there was a huge airborne level. And second,
even if we assume that radon is a dangerous as they say it is, we're still
just talking about an increased chance of getting cancer -- not a sure thing.
Driving is pretty dangerous, too (I'd guess more dangerous), but lots of
people drive and still live to a ripe old age. Nonetheless, it is
worthwhile to try to minimize the dangers of driving, and I think that it
is also worthwhile to try to minimize the dangers from radon.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
58.294 | r.o. con't | NSSG::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Thu Mar 30 1989 00:22 | 10 |
| re: .-2 reverse osmosis and periodic backflushing
R.O. units that I have seen have continual runoff from the pressure
side of the membrane (waste water).
Units up to 25 gallons/day can usually be run off home water pressure
(30-50 psi). Units with higher capacities usually include feed
pumps (not typical for most users).
__Rich
|
58.303 | Some more info. | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Thu Mar 30 1989 13:35 | 41 |
|
I just attended a seminar on radon that was conducted by
a doctor with a nuclear engineering background. It was very
informative.
RE: Water - Those with town water shouldn't worry because
municipal supplies are aerated thus eliminating
the source.
Those with well water should use aeration if
there is a problem.
RE: Radon - Radon is not the danger it is the radon
daughters (decay by-products) which are a
danger. 55% of normal background radiation
that people are exposed to daily is from
naturally occuring radon gas (no you can't
hide from it)
Only the non-fractional radon by-products
are dangerous. Let me try to explain what
was presented.
* Radon decays into by-products, some adhere
to materials, thus no human exposure (not-respirable);
Some particles cling to dust and are breathed in
and then OUT. Our bodies are efficient dust filters.
Some non-fractional particles get by the body
filtering system and are deposited into the
sensitive tissue of the lower trachea (not the
lungs themselves) Most radon lung cancers are
tracheal-bronchial as oppossed to other types
of cancer.
There are proven ways to mitigate radon build-up
(cost money yes, but they are there).
If anyone has a specific question I'll try and remember
some of the other points/data mentioned.
|
58.304 | a basic question | VICKI::PAHIGIAN | HCI: snobbery, racism, lies. | Sun Apr 02 1989 21:42 | 5 |
| Which has the worse record, dug or point/artesian wells?
Is there any correlation between well depth and gas concentration?
- craig
|
58.305 | | PSTJTT::TABER | It offends my freakin' dignity | Mon Apr 03 1989 09:33 | 8 |
| > Most radon lung cancers are
> tracheal-bronchial as oppossed to other types
> of cancer.
Did he mention how they determine if the cancer is caused by radon? At
least two years ago there was no way to tell.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
58.306 | Not 100% certain | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Mon Apr 03 1989 12:36 | 22 |
|
RE: .9 I don't know if he said that was a 100% conclusion,
but the radon daughters particulate size and mode
of transportation has shown that if there is a cancer
in the tracheal-bronchial area, it is a pretty good
chance it could be from radon daughter's decay, because
particulates from cigarette smoke, other substances,
etc... have a tendancy to settle elsewhere in the
respiratory system.
Now if you smoke and inhale radon decay products then
I would imagine there would be a wider deposition of
material caused by multiple substances. Which one
is going to get you first, who knows. We can do
something about smoking, about air pollution, about
concentrated radon in air and water, but the background
stuff is going to get you anyway, but hopefully over
a longer period of time, and by then something else
will probably get you.
Mark
|
58.307 | Site by site basis | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Mon Apr 03 1989 12:42 | 14 |
|
RE: .8 I don't think there is anyway to qualify whether a
dug or artesian well is going to have more or less
radon or for that matter for depth/concentration either.
Concentrations (presence) of radon will vary with
geology of the well site. The only sure way to know
is to check each site individually to determine
this information.
In any case, well water should be aerated.
Mark
|
58.308 | I can share with your problem | CADSE::COOL | | Mon Apr 03 1989 12:58 | 26 |
| I also went to sell my house and found out about by radon problem
in the well water.... I had approximatly 63000 perci's per whatever
in my water... I researched the various methods of eliminating the
radon from my water.... I finally ended up going with the air-ation
method.. because: (don't know how to spell air-ation)
1) no toxic waste to get rid of... The radon gas from
the water id vented outdoors and causes no potential harm.
2) Air-ation systems ususally eliminate 95% of radon from
water and brings you into EPA guidelines.
3) A pretty much non-maintainence system.
4) In my opionon, makes your house easier to sell once
potential buyer finds out about radon problem and also
finds out you have installed the best system.
5) I personally moved out of house and moved back to mass.
to get into a town with sewer and water.... My situation
was in Londonderry, and the town nor the state wanted to
help us out and yet I had to pay the town 6k a year
in real estate taxes... This motivated my wife and I to
move to Taxachusetts where alot of towns have water and
sewer, alot less real estate taxes, good schools and alot
closer to the 495/128/hub industry....Carl Cool
|
58.476 | DEEPROCK WELL DRILLING | VIDEO::WOODMAN | | Wed Apr 05 1989 10:34 | 14 |
| Has any person used the DEEPROCK well drilling product??
if so how was it for drilling thru different types of soil??
Did the product perform as expected?
Would their be a used unit for sale that some one might know about??
Any0ne ever done Dowsing for water??
THX
John Woodman 235-8482 VIDEO::WOODMAN
|
58.477 | Dowsing | ATSE::GOODWIN | | Wed Apr 05 1989 16:34 | 64 |
| I've been on one half of a dowsing stick and ripped the bark right off
it trying to keep it from pointing toward the ground. It was a demo by
a former skeptic who became a believer and then a practitioner of water
dowsing.
This guy, who is in his 80's or 90's today if he is still around, was a
neighbor and friend down in Sandy Spring, Maryland. A friend of his
was the president of the American Dowsing Association. The pres's son
was busy at the time running all over southeast Asia dowsing for water
for the Marine Corps.
My friend, Art, had built a new house in the country and drilled a well
in the nearest convenient spot. He didn't find water, even though he
went down several hundred feet. He then had the drillers try in some
other spots, each one less convenient, but with no success.
Meanwhile, a neighbor of his said, why don't you have so_and_so dowse
for water. Art got a good laugh out of it and drilled a few more dry
wells. To make a long story short, he finally got so frustrated he
figured why not, and asked the dowser to find him some water.
The dowser asked Art for his location preferences, one of which was the
driveway. The dowser walked down the drive about halfway, and Art saw
his stick dip toward the ground. The fellow walked back and forth
several times, and up and down, and did this and that. Then he called
Art over and announced that he would find water if he drilled right
there, that the water was from a moving underground stream, what
direction the stream was flowing, that it was good drinking water, that
it was between 60 and 65 feet down, and that it was under some pressure
and would come at least part way up to the surface.
I probably don't need to tell you Art's reaction. Same as mine would
have been. So old Art says, "I'll pay your bill just as soon as the
water comes up," and the dowser says, "Fine with me."
It was 63 feet down, it was good to drink, and it came up to within 10
feet of the surface under its own pressure. No one could figure out
how to tell what direction the underground stream was flowing, and Art
really didn't care.
Art and the dowser became good friends, and Art learned how to dowse
and tried to teach me, but it just didn't work for me. Art said that
some folks were like that. They also do plumb bob dowsing, which
involves swinging a little weight on a string back and forth and
talking to it. Apparently it answers back sometimes.
Art told me some folks can find water with a coat hanger, some folks
can find oil, and there are lots of other stories.
Try it yourself -- get a forked twig off a tree (should be live, apple
trees are best) shaped like an upside down Y, hold the lower ends of
the Y in your fists so that your thumbs are outward and the ends of
the twig are being bent outward. Your elbows point inward, the end of
the twig where the ends you are holding should be pointing up at maybe
45 degrees from the horizon. You'll probably have to practice until
you get it just right. Any slight movement of your hands will dause
the pointer end of the twig to move upward or downward.
Then walk around your house or yard. When you get over water the stig
should exhibit some tendency to point downward. Try to hold it so that
it is right on the edge of pointing downward, then just keep enough
pressure on it to keep it point upward until you cross some water.
Who knows, it might work for you.
|
58.681 | Frequent Duty Cycles | WEFXEM::COTE | The fool screams no more... | Fri Apr 07 1989 09:00 | 7 |
| My pump seems to be going through shorter but more frequent duty
cycles. Shut-off pressure seems OK, ~45lbs.
My gut reaction is that I've lost the charge in my captive air tank.
Does that explanation make sense?
Edd
|
58.682 | RE-CHARGE it! | CSMET2::CHACE | let's go fishin' | Fri Apr 07 1989 11:03 | 20 |
|
Yes, your diagnosis of losing the charge in your captive-air tank
is probably correct. It's easy to recharge (which is what you should
do before figuring something's broken).
To recharge a captive air tank:
1. Shut-off the power to your pump.
2. Open an outside faucet until no more water flows
out. (the idea is to have NO water pressure
in the tank) Leave this faucet OPEN until done.
3. With a bicycle pump and tire gauge add air to the
fitting on top of the tank until the tank's
pressure is equal to the pump turn ON pressure. (this
will be the LOW side of your normal pressure
swing)
4. Close the faucet opened in #2
5. Turn the pump back on - it should now work great!
Kenny
|
58.683 | Thanks!! | WEFXEM::COTE | The fool screams no more... | Fri Apr 07 1989 17:32 | 8 |
| Thank you muchly!
I'm assuming that the air charge helps to maintain a more constant
pressure by compressing. Since water won't compress, *any* use will
cause the pressure to drop, and since there's no expanding air to
maintain pressure, voila, pump on.... yes?
Edd
|
58.197 | Seems to be seasonal... | ENGLES::SULLIVAN | Don't Panic | Sat Apr 08 1989 23:18 | 25 |
| Obviously been awhile since I had a chance to read this notes file...
We have the same problem. The smell is caused be Hydrogen Sulfide.
Considered harmless but anoying just the same. We use bottled water
for drinking and cooking. It had almost gone away but just recently
came back VERY strong. Our neighbors tell us that it happens every
Spring.
Our Iron test came out at 4.9 mg/liter (EPA Max .3).
Manganese was .13 mg/liter (EPA max .050)
We installed a "green sand" filter from The Water Store in Westford
MA. Total cost was ~$1000 installed. It is low maintenance. It has
a timer which causes it to automatically backwash every 3 (selectable)
days. The only maintenance is to add some Potassium Permanganate
every 3 months (used during the backwash to flush out the iron
sediment. It does not enter your water system. And they claim it
does not harm the septic system).
So far so good. We don't have the results of the after installation
test yet but the toilets and other fixtures are no longer stained
and our clothes no longer turn brown in the wash.
Mark
|
58.684 | Yes, the air compresses to even out the delivery! | CSMET2::CHACE | let's go fishin' | Mon Apr 10 1989 15:32 | 6 |
|
Yes, you are completely correct as to what the air does for the
pump system. Just remember, you can NOT accurately test the tank's
air-charge pressure if there is ANY water pressure present.
Kenny
|
58.309 | What's the max level? | SALEM::ANDREWS | Baldness - It's all in your head | Tue Apr 11 1989 11:00 | 27 |
| Re: .4 (Jon Reckard)
Please tell me something! When I called and checked on the maximum
acceptable level by the EPA, I was told 10,000 picocuries! Where
did you hear the number of 30,000?! I'm very concerned about
this, because my level is just over 20,000. So I would pass if
the maximum level was 30,000. But they told me it was 10,000!
I've just installed a carbon type filter to my water pump, which
should do the trick. Carbon is NOT the recommended solution to
this problem, but I do not care to spend $3K on an areation system.
Besides, I heard that with the areation system you need to have
a fan running 24 hours a day to blow the radon outside. Is this
true? Sounds like this would increase the electric bill a bit.
Also, I bought this carbon type water filter at Sear's. They told
me they would come out to my house once a year and change the filter.
So, they must know where to get rid of this possible radioactive
waste, or maybe they haven't thought about these filters having
radon build-up in them? They could always put the waste in the
same place they dump the stuff from the nuclear power plants.
Well, my water will be re-tested again late this week. As soon
as I get the results I will post them here.
- John
|
58.310 | A contributor | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Tue Apr 11 1989 13:43 | 17 |
| RE: .13
The basic measurement for radon in air is 4 pCi/l, there is
really no measurement established for water as far as I can
tell from EPA documentation. The radon in the water is not
harmful until it becomes airborne, thus the EPA states that
for every 10,000 pCi/l of radon in water, that will contribute
to approximately 1 pCi/l of radon in air. So in your case,
the water at 30,000 pCi/l could contribute 3 pCi/l in addition
to what is all ready present from other sources.
If your air reading was 6 pCi/l, then potentially 3 was
added from the water?
Mark
|
58.311 | Radon up the... | SALEM::ANDREWS | Baldness - It's all in your head | Tue Apr 11 1989 15:12 | 16 |
| Re: .14 (Mark)
No, my well water test came in at a little over 20,000 pci/l.
My air level came in at around 2 pci/l.
I called the lab that did the test, and they thought it was
very unusual to have such low levels in the air, but high levels
in the water. They went on to say that it "Just doesn't sound
right". So, apparently nobody knows much about this stuff.
I'm VERY curious as to why the other noter said the EPA told
him the maximum level is 30,000 pci/l, and they told me it
was 10,000 pci/l. Does it matter which town you live in??
- John
|
58.312 | Not sure, but here goes. | SONATA::HICKOX | Stow Vice | Tue Apr 11 1989 17:06 | 18 |
|
RE:.15
Low levels in the air, don't worry about it, you
probably have good ventilation whether you know it or not,
if you have 20,000 pCi/l in water that coverts to 2 pCi/l
air according to EPA which is exactly what you have from
your test.
It doesn't matter where you live, the house next door to
you could have 3,000 pCi/l in air while you have 2. Its
a matter of a lot of geology mainly. What's your house
sitting over, or where is your water drawn from in relation
to radioactive materials in the ground, how well is your
house or well ventilated is what really determines your levels.
|
58.479 | Connecting well supply to inside plumbing... | CSC32::S_LEDOUX | Specialization is for insects. | Tue Apr 11 1989 17:42 | 24 |
| A few quick searches didn't turn up an appropriate title to put this
question under so I gave it its own topic:
My well water comes in from the well in some sorta plastic pipe (pvc?)
where it comes into the house, throught the crawl space and up into my
utility room where the tanks&heaters are. The plastic pipe from the
well seems to fit into a smaller plastic pipe for the pressure tank.
The pipes are held together by two hose clamps. Over time, these clamps
loosen or the pipes shrink and the two pipes come apart with a loud
POP. After this happens, water is happily sucked from the well and
deposited on my utility room floor where it drains into my crawlspace,
leaks into the house, garage, everything. It all depends on how much
time goes by before the problem gets noticed and I kill the breaker.
Its happened to me twice in the last four months so I assume it WILL
happen again.
There MUST be a better way to connect the two lines. Or maybe rig some
kind of alarm that goes off and trips the breaker if it senses water on
the floor or the loss of connection between the pipes.
Any ideas ?
Thanks,
- S -
|
58.480 | Check this & try that! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Wed Apr 12 1989 08:41 | 12 |
| First thing I'd do is check the pressure switch to see when the
well pump is set to cut in and cut out. I run mine around 30 lb.
cut in and 50 lb. cut out. If your pressure switch is set to high
or is malfunctioning on the cut out side, this may be popping your
connection. I'd also replace the PVC connection fitting with a new
one. The male section which fits into your well's pvc supply line
may be too small or the friction ribs may be worn. When you reconnect
the two PVC lines, make sure you lightly heat the ends of the pipes
with a blow torch (be carefull you don't burn the pipe, you only
want to heat it up enough to sofen the PVC) then install and tighten
your band clamps. I'd recommend installing two clamps on each side
to insure a good tight fit. Good Luck, and stay dry!
|
58.481 | Use strap metal to secure lines? | SALEM::ISAACS | | Wed Apr 12 1989 10:06 | 21 |
| I'm no expert on this by any means but a thought comes to mind right
away. What if you were to take a piece of strap metal (the kind
with holes along the entire length of it) and mount it to a hose
clamp screw on either side of the connection? It seems as though
this would prevent the water lines from being able to pull apart.
I've made an attempt at drawing a diagram of what I'm talking about.
I hope this helps.
Garv
| |
| |
hose clamp---->----|-|<-----hose clamp screw
----|-|
water lines--->| | |<-------strap metal
| | |
____|_|
hose clamp---->____|_|<-----hose clamp screw
| |
| |
|
58.482 | try a reducer | MILRAT::UGRINOW | | Wed Apr 12 1989 13:52 | 15 |
| When we relocated our house we went with a shallow well and brought
the water into our cellar...difference is that our pump is not in
the well. Within the first few days the plastic pressure tube burst
and we had a couple inches of water and the pump melted! I checked
around and couldn't find any such sensor from major plumbing distrib
in/around Worcester,MA...toyed with the idea of building one myself
but that's on a back burner! The one thing we did which you may
consider is to use a "reducer" that would go from the larger PVC
to the smaller. This would be "ribbed" as mention already and you
should lightly heat with a torch. We used stainless steel straps
on all our plumbing and I haven't had any trouble. By the way,
my father replaced the plastic pressure tube with copper...we sleep
better now!
Nick
|
58.483 | Water Alarm @ Spag's | CHART::CBUSKY | | Wed Apr 12 1989 14:19 | 8 |
| > I checked around and couldn't find any such sensor from major plumbing
> distrib in/around Worcester,MA...toyed with the idea of building one myself
I believe Spag's has a water sensor alarm. It's a battery operated
device, about the size of a smoke alarm that you place on the floor.
When it gets wet, it sounds an alarm.
Charly
|
58.313 | Report on radon in water | MCNALY::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Thu Apr 13 1989 08:47 | 0 |
58.314 | Report on well water | MCNALY::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Thu Apr 13 1989 08:59 | 139 |
| Here's a mini-report I've pulled together from the EPA's "Radon
Reduction Methods" pamphlet. I've also gathered material from an
informational meeting our town hosted last week: experts from various
state (NH) branches of its Department of Environmental Services (DES)
were invited to report on and answer questions about some very high
radon-in-water test results (up to 2.3 million pCi/l!!) from various
private wells in town - there were two "state geologists", two from
Bureau of Water Supply and one from Radiological Health. (Ours was
"only" 497,000.)
Just to define one term here, radon is measured in "pCi/l"s, or
picocuries per liter. One picocurie is one trillionth of the amount of
radiation emitted from one gram of radium 226. This is how the state
geologist defined it.
-----
"The potential concern with radon in water is the airborne radon
released when water is used. The amount of radon that is given off
from water depends on the amount in the water initially. The amount
given off will increase as the temperature of the water increases and
as the surface area exposed to air increases.
"In the home, activities and appliances that spray or agitate heated
water (showers, dishwashers and clothes washers) create the largest
release of waterborne radon. However, the level of radon in household
water must be very high to significantly influence the overall level in
the air within a house. As a rule of thumb, 10,000 pCi/l of radon in
the incoming household water is equivalent to 1 pCi/l of radon in the
indoor air.
"In some areas, especially in the northeast and west, water from private
wells or small community water systems can contain sufficient radon to
contribute significantly to elevated levels within a house. Water from
large community water supplies releases most of its radon before it
reaches individual houses.
"Two techniques can be considered to remove radon from water. The first
requires either spraying water into a contained air space, introducing
air bubbles into the water, or storing water in a tank until the radon
has decayed. The second uses granular activated carbon (GAC) to remove
radon from the water. The GAC method has been more widely tested and
is more commonly used in individual homes. Radiation buildup in the
unit itself may cause exposure and disposal problems.
"For more detailed information on radon in water see the recent EPA
booklet, "Removal of Radon From Household Water (OPA-87-011)."
(The preceding was quoted from the EPA booklet. And, no, there's no
copyright protection here, so "without permission" isn't necessary.)
Now from our "town meeting":
Measuring radon in water involves: collecting water in a clean
container (testing outfits usually provide sterile containers) getting
the water sample to the testing outfit as quickly as possible (radon's
half-life is 3.8 days), and waiting for the results. Because radon in
water decays so quickly, results should be available quickly. NH DES
charged $15; one private firm I talked to wants $35.
There is no official recommended limit (yet) for radon in water. The
state of Maine has recommended 20,000 pCi/l. One NH state guy
mentioned that the EPA has been saying they'll come up with a
_proposed_ limit for the past couple years. The latest is that
sometime this fall, 1989, EPA _will_ recommend something. He's heard a
wide range of proposed numbers, ranging from 20,000 to 5,000. His
hunch is that it'll be closer to the 5,000 number.
No radon treatment outfits - from air or water - are certified or
accredited by any governmental agencies. One piece of regulation,
however, of which I'm aware, is that no radon _testing_ outfit can sell
you any radon _treatment_. The EPA, or whoever, wants to divorce those
two functions as completely as possible, what with conflict of interest
and such.
An activated carbon system, similar to the little guys you can put
under your kitchen sink for drinking water, was _not_ recommended.
(Remember, I'm talking about radon only.) It is less expensive. The
problem is that the carbon is an extremely efficient filter, and it
traps and holds everything it filters out of your water. The result?
Toxic waste.
(One state geologist told of one guy whose filter got so radioactively
"hot", it couldn't even be measured with the standard Geiger counter or
whatever; add to this the fact that the government only deals with
licensed radioactive waste places (so far), so they wouldn't touch it;
the guy finally got a back-hoe, put a lead suit on (Spag's probably has
them), threw it in the back-hoe's scoop, and buried it in his "back 40"
- all probably illegal (there's still quite a bit of gray area here).
The state geologist's only advice was to change the filter OFTEN.)
The other option is to "bubble" the radon out of your water and vent
it to the outside. This kind of system goes for $2495, $2995 and $3495
(two vendors - and three systems - were there). It's just a tank, with
zillions of bubbles flying through your water (on demand), and a
pressure tank which brings the pressure back up for household use. One
vendor I talked to said it's the opposite of the standard aquarium
bubbler which puts some air into a lot of water; his system puts some
water through a lot of air. One tricky part of installing it is the
vent. Ideally it should go to or past the peak of the house -
otherwise the radon could be sucked back in the house. (I didn't ask
about how often or how long the venting fan is on, but, for what it's
worth, the whole tank is relatively air-tight, so it wouldn't take long
to vent all the air in the tank.)
A related issue in water is something called Screen Alpha. With a
high radon-in-water test result, it's recommended that you get a Screen
Alpha test. This measures all "alpha-emitting radiation" and is an
indication of radioactive _particles_ in your water, not _gas_ as is
radon. If _this_ number is high enough, you should test for radium and
uranium (yes, these are all separate tests). For uranium, there is
again no current recommended limit. For radium, *in a public water
supply*, the limit is 5 pCi/l. These tests, because of different decay
rates or half-lifes or something, take two weeks as a minimum.
(Particles, or solids, are potential problems if ingested, again,
unlike radon gas. Radium, for one, is a "bone-seeker"; this means if
ingested, it settles in bone marrow, with a potential leukemia risk.
As far as radium or uranium treatment is concerned, the good news is
that a standard ion-exchange (salt) water softener catches radium. The
silly news is that uranium, if a problem, must be removed with a
similar but "opposite" ion-exchange gizmo (something about anions and
cations). Minor good news is that radium and uranium are seldom found
together.
An interesting story was told about one house in Colorado which had a
radon-in-air reading of 1,000 pCi/l and radon-in-water of 2.8 million.
The state moved the family out <no flames from the live-free-or-die-ers
please>. Interestingly, the thermostat! was turned down. This,
combined with nobody taking showers or washing clothes or dishes,
brought the radon-in-air reading to 18 or 180 (sorry, I forget which).
To the author of the base note (if you're still with me), I'll second
what somebody said about your 2 pCi/l in air. I wouldn't worry about
it too much. As you know, that's under EPA's recommended limit of 4.
If you're concerned about your 20,000 pCi/l, test for Screen Alpha.
Bottom line is the air, though. Maybe take more air tests in your
bedrooms (near bathrooms) and/or kitchen or wherever your clothes- and
dish-washer is.
|
58.198 | New iron filter needed | AKOV11::FAUCHER | | Thu Apr 13 1989 15:30 | 52 |
| I've been in my house a year, and every 2 months have had to change
the iron filter, sodium filter I believe - brand CUNO, which ends up
costing $45 a month in replacemnt filters...it adds up !!
So, I had a water analysis done, with the thought that I'd get a
new filter that didn't require as much maintenance, and not as
costly on an ongoing basis...here are the results :
results MCL (Maximum according to CUNO)
------- ------
PH 6.78
TDS (???) 61.80 500
TURBIDITY .32 .5
TOTAL HARDNESS 40.00 150.00
IRON 3.80 .30
MANGANESE .26 .05
COPPER .10 .10
TANNIN .30 .50
CUNO came back and recommended a "AQUA-PURE IRON REMOVAL SYSTEM"
which has "filter media" to be replaced every 3 months to address
the high manganese condition (I wonder how much this will cost).
And the system would have to be "frequently" backwashed due to
the "HIGH" level of Tannin (doesn't seem high to me). The
product retails for about $800.
Before I make any drastic decisions, I wanted to get your advice
on this...in reading the notes, it's apparant that there are so
many alternatives...and so many other considerations, such as
PH, hardness and other properties.
Has anyone heard of CUNO ? Any other recommendations ? I've
seen reference to AMWAY products, and wonder if I should
research what they've got ? It sounds like I should also
check into this "green sand" filter from Westford...how long
have you had the system Mark ?
Regarding the Hydrogen Sulfide odor...could this be the odor
I periodically smell in the neighborhood that I've attributed
to a neighbor's septic system...even though I know the septic
tank is new and relatively empty ? It also seems to be more
prevalent in the spring...If this is so, is this odor coming
from the ground or could the neighbor do something to limit
the release of this odor into the neighborhood ?
Thanks...
|
58.478 | COMMENTS ON DEEPROCK | SPGBAS::HARBOLD | | Wed Apr 26 1989 14:13 | 20 |
| I am not directly involved in the water well business, but my brother
in law is and some time ago I asked him about Deeprock and their
products. My memory lists the following:
1. The unit will drill a hole as advertised. The hole is small,
an 1 1/2 or 2 inch hole is all that is drilled. This compares with
his 6 inch hole or 5 inch that some drillers use.
2. The small size requires special pumps, and piping that have
some deliver size limits which affect pressure.
3. Most wells have a particular flow rate. The average house needs
at least 5 gallons per minute to cover peak usage. Anything less
means building up a reservoir which can be in the form of the well
itself or in external storage tanks or cisterns. The best is the
well because the water stays naturally cool and fresh. The DEEPROCK
cannot provide for this storage.
Personally I would not consider this for a house. It could be used
to water gardens or maybe take care of a small vacation cottage.
|
58.295 | Problem is Solved!!!! | PBA::BETTENCOURT | | Tue May 02 1989 09:34 | 38 |
|
< No more Arsenic!!>
I finally hooked up with Nova Water systems in Londonderry
N.H. I worked with Bill Berg who is the manager. I decided to go
with his system for a number of reasons.
Time being of the essence, I needed one quickly and he had
one in stock. Sears gave me the run around on which store had it
and the sales people were useless.
The installation was included in the price and was put in by
Nova people as opposed to other companies who subbed the work out.
The system provides 15 gal of water per day (more than I need
for drinking/cooking) and included a subsequent water test which
was mailed to my home equity company. Bill put a clause in the
contract (order) which stated the arsenic level would be brought
below 5 ppm or additional equipment would be added to the system
at Nova's cost until it was. Or my money could be refunded. It also
has a point od use faucet in my bathroom and my kitchen.
It cost $890 (ouch) but I feel you get what you pay for. If
I continued to live there I want nothing but the best and when I
leave I want to feel that I did the best I could do to remediate
the problem for myself or anyone who would move in.
The water test came back with NO DETECTABLE ARSENIC and was
sent to the home equity company. They were happy, I was very happy
and the offer came thru and I'm on my way. Thanx for everyone's
help and suggestions.It made the difference!
Regards,
M.
|
58.199 | Summary of H2O Cond. Cos I contacted | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Thu May 04 1989 17:04 | 82 |
| Someone suggested I list a rundown of the companies we evaluated during
our search to find a whole house water filter (which I thought was a good
idea).
First we had our water independently tested and again tested by some of
the companies we consulted.
Results of independent testing were: Iron .29 mg; Manganese .045 mg;
PH 6.4; hardness 53.7
Company Recommendation Cost
LINDSAY * "Sense-A-Tronic Water Softener" $1,615
Brenda Layne and Iron Remover w/ auto timer includes
(603) 382-4394 Said they're only co. with both install.
1987 contact softener and iron remover in 1
Had difficult time answering
any nonstandard questions
Didn't volunteer to get info.
NORTHEAST WATER * I mention this co in note 845.49
CONDITIONING Chuck Noe was fine it was his boss
Chuck Noe Ken Bruso who was problem.
603-483-8531 First recommended "PWX All Pump Filter" $850,
1987 & 88 contact for iron, ph and turbidity also thought list 1.2K
we needed "Series 1 Water Refiner" but
could get by on Filter only.
Several mos later mailed special offer
on Series 1 Water Refiner which removes $900,
iron & hardness. Now said (Ken) wouldn't list 1.3K
guarantee iron problem would be solved
unless we bought both. Again dropped
price on Water Refiner to $799
-----
$1649
SEARS ROEBUCK * Solution Dispenser $350
1986 contact Blending tank 140
Diff to find anyone Auto clarifying tank 310
interested & Taste & odor tank filter optional 310
knowledgeable ------
$1110
WATER STORE * Green Sand unit w/ computer backwash. $671
Westford | Acid neutralizer 350
Laura Feeney ----
508-692-8408 | $1021
1986 contact V
Connected with Thorstensen Lab. Thorstensen was lab who independently
tested water (required at the time by the bank)
SAFE WATER * "Metro" Unit to balance ph, filter $850
Ayer out iron & manganese. Greensand is
Montel Wilder regenerated with potassium permanganate
508-772-7855
1988 contact
CUNO, Inc * "AquaPure" for iron, ph & manganese $740
Meridan, CT uses aspirator & bed type filter.
203-237-5541 in media of calcium carbonate &
Gave us # of magnesium oxide
local distributor
for actual
purchase
1988 & 89 contact
CULLIGAN "Sofner-gard" water conditioner removes don't
Lowell iron & hardness have
617-454-8896 price
* - also tested our water
All would install for approx. $200. I do have descriptive info on how
each unit works which I'd be glad to share should someone be interested.
All our contacts made recommendations according to our unique water tests.
The particular AquaPure we purchased from CUNO was recommended because of
our water conditions and flow rates. In the final analysis I guess we were
most impressed with CUNO's knowledge, service and price so went with them.
My husband picked it up and installed himself. Most of the above companies
probably would have been been fine to purchase from.
Kathy
|
58.200 | More info please? | MRFLEX::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Fri May 05 1989 09:21 | 12 |
| > Results of independent testing were: Iron .29 mg; Manganese .045 mg;
> PH 6.4; hardness 53.7
> CUNO, Inc * "AquaPure" for iron, ph & manganese $740
> Meridan, CT uses aspirator & bed type filter.
First of all, iron isn't a problem right? My info gives recommended maximums
of 0.3 for iron, 0.05 for manganese, and a rage of 6.5 to 8.5 for ph.
Secondly, my understanding was that iron and ph are completed unrelated.
And your water is being treated with one "machine" for *both* for only $740?
Can you verify that both "problems" have indeed been fixed?
|
58.201 | Only another test will tell for sure | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Fri May 12 1989 17:51 | 22 |
|
RE .58
Our iron staining was terrible. Several people told us you don't
need much iron to get staining. Hadn't washed clothes at home for
2 years!
Iron and pH is unrelated but is supposedly taken care of by this
one system. The system Safe Water recommended also took care of
the 3 problems and was $850, not much higher than the CUNO. We
installed the CUNO unit a few months ago and have not yet retested the
water. It has taken awhile for us to work out how often we backwash.
There is a dramatic improvement in the water clarity and taste. We do
still occasionally get bursts of iron in various faucets but believe
it's from the 30 years of iron crud built up in the pipes.
If you are interested in CUNO's "Aqua-Pure" process or unit I would send you
a copy of the brochure if you like Also they have an 800-243-6894
number to get technical information. My husband was most impressed
with their assistance and follow through.
K
|
58.815 | Using a Shallow Well Pump | CSSE32::APRIL | Winter Wanderer | Tue Jun 06 1989 15:11 | 14 |
|
I have a plumbing question. My camp in Vermont has a brand new
pump & tank as of last year. We pump water from the lake (about 20-25
feet away) for use in the camp (we use spring water for drinking, etc.).
The system worked fine last year. Prior to Winter I drained the system.
This past weekend we tried to activate the system again and I can't
get it to hold a prime. It seems to have a lot of air in the pipes.
We let the water run for a long time at the farthest point in the
system and it STILL has air blowing out the faucet. The footvalve in
the feeder from the lake is fine and so is the one in the pump itself.
I can't figure out what's wrong. Any suggestions ?
Chuck
|
58.816 | possible probelms | HPSCAD::WHITMAN | Acid rain burns my BASS | Tue Jun 06 1989 17:09 | 29 |
| < This past weekend we tried to activate the system again and I can't
< get it to hold a prime. It seems to have a lot of air in the pipes.
< We let the water run for a long time at the farthest point in the
< system and it STILL has air blowing out the faucet. The footvalve in
< the feeder from the lake is fine and so is the one in the pump itself.
< I can't figure out what's wrong. Any suggestions ?
I too have a shallow well near a lake. My biggest problem was getting all the
air out of the supply pipe, I'd fill and fill but I'd get an air bubble in the
line. I could tell because when I'd blow into the 'full' pipe I could force the
water down compressing the bubble and when I stopped blowing I'd get all wet
because the bubble expanded again. When I finally got all the air out of the
pipe, the water would not compress and I didn't get wet anymore.
You might try disconnecting the supply pipe from the pump, fill it the pipe
with water from a bucket to see how long it takes for the water to drain out.
Almost no water should be lost if the supply pipe/foot valve is intact.
Are you getting air blowing from the spigot closest to the pump??? It might
be easier to seperate the problem into supply system (pump, supply pipe, foot
valve) and the distribution system (building plumbing).
If it's the supply side then my first guess would be a cracked the pipe
between the footvalve and the pump. Did you remove the footvalve from the
system for the winter and blow air out the lake end of the pipe to be sure it
was free of water?? If you had air leaking in at the pump, the footvalve should
still allow the pump to keep its prime. Is this a piston pump or impeller pump?
Al
|
58.817 | 1111.108, 1257, 1297 | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Jun 06 1989 17:23 | 18 |
| This note has been temporarily write-locked pending approval of the author.
To the author: This subject is already under discussion in this file, under the
topics listed in the title. Please look at these notes; you may find that your
question is already answered, or you may find a note where your question would
be an appropriate continuation of the discussion. Note that since nearly
everyone uses NEXT UNSEEN to read notes, your question will get the same
exposure whether it is a response to a two-year-old note or it is its own new
note. These topics were found using the keyword directory (note 1111), and you
may find other notes relating to this subject by examining the directory
yourself.
We do, however, welcome new notes if they explore a specific aspect of a
problem that may be under general discussion. And this moderator has been
known to make mistakes. :^) So if after examining these notes, you wish to
continue the discussion here, send me mail.
Paul [Moderator]
|
58.818 | Artesian well has low reserve - how to improve? | STAR::MCCORMICK | | Tue Jul 18 1989 14:59 | 31 |
| I have read through all of the notes in this file regarding wells, but
I've seen very little about artesian wells.
I am currently trying to sell my house, a 200-year old Cape in Weare,
NH. We have interested buyers, but they want to inspect the well
(which is artesian) since they noticed that the water pressure is kind
of low.
Even though the house sits on very wet land with a high water table,
when we had the water pump fixed recently, the repair person commented
that the water level in the well was very low-- according to him, there
was only about 4 feet of water in the bottom of the well, which I guess
is unusual. We have noticed since moving in 3 years ago that if you
leave the hose going too long (for hours, that is), the water pressure
is eventually non-existent. Usually, though, in showering, running the
dishwasher, and doing laundry, there is no noticeable problem.
Anyway, now I'm very nervous about the prospect of their doing an
inspection. I know the water quality is good, but I wonder about the
long-term viability of the well.
Does anyone know if there is anything we can do to improve the
productivity of the well, and/or if there is anything we can say about
it to reassure the buyers? Does it sound like a serious problem, or
nothing to be overly concerned about? As I said, it has never been a
problem for us, but I'm worried that it could give the buyers cold
feet.
Thanks,
Katie McCormick
|
58.819 | Have it inspected yourself! | POLAR::MACDONALD | | Tue Jul 18 1989 15:37 | 15 |
| If I were a buyer, I would be hesitant, because of the potential
cost of sinking a new well. If I were the seller, I would also be
concerned, but I would take the positive approach and be up-front
with the information; get it inspected with possible recommendations
and the cost of each. Let the buyer know what the score is; nothing
causes them to hesitate more than something "fishy", or some potential
coverup.
When I sold my house in Ma. a few years I had a well problem with
a constant battle of adding chlorine twice a year to keep the
odor down; I made this known to any potential buyer and the ultimate
purchaser thanked me for my honesty and even paid $5K more than I was
asking.
Bernie
|
58.820 | | AKOV13::MACDOWELL | | Tue Jul 18 1989 16:26 | 8 |
| The cost of sinking a new well probably won't be more than 3-5K.
If I were the buyer, I'd probably see this as one more point to
negotiate on the purchase price. I second the recommendation to
have it inspected yourself--if, indeed there is a problem, you can
take a proactive approach and offer to give them a "rebate" at closing
to help defray some of the cost of a new well.
Susan
|
58.821 | Be up front about it, or fix it | PRGMUM::FRIDAY | Patience averts the severe decree | Fri Jul 21 1989 11:45 | 12 |
| Like previous entries I also suggest being right up-front
about the well. And be sure to get in writing that the
buyer has been told about it. Otherwise it's possible that
the buyer could come back and claim the property was
mis-represented and sue.
Our friends sold their house and were upfront with the buyer
about a problem with a drain freezing in the winter. But
they didn't get it in writing that they'd told the buyer.
The buyer came back and tried to sue them for a huge amount
of money later. (The buyer lost but our friends ended up having
to pay a lawyer, so they lost too.)
|
58.327 | Lightning and well water | AKOV12::GODIN | Just a Subroutine in the SW of life | Thu Jul 27 1989 17:09 | 42 |
| I couldn't find a note that specifically addresses this so I'll
put it in to see what comments are generated.
About two weeks ago, we in the Mass area had thunderstorms on a
Monday afternoon. When I arrived home, my wife noticed that we ran
out of water. I went to the basement and found the circuit breakers
to the well pump tripped. I reset the breakers and the pump started
to run. But we were bringing up very dirty water. As a note I've
been in the house (first owner of the house) for five years and
never had a problem with the well. We then ran the water for some
time and it started to clear but still wasn't drinkable.
The next day I called several Well contrcators as inquired as to
what could of happended. They all told me the same thing. Apparently
I had a lightning strike near the well and it, in thier words, "shook
up" the ground. I believe that as the water suddenly was yucky!
The recommendation was just the run the pump and the water, once
things settle down, should clear. Sure enough, four or five days
later it did clear enough for us to drink. I've since had the water
tested, and the water is ok but there is iron in the water but not
over acceptable limits.
But the story isn't over. After the water cleared we notice that
the flow was spitting out of the faucet. In other words air was
getting in the system. I called the well folks again and they said
that the check valve near the pump (down about several hundred feet)
could have been damaged or the pipe may be cracked, either one allowing
water to leak out when the pump shuts off. When the pump comes on
it pushes the air and the water into the house, hence the spitting
flow.
We are still getting good water flow but I've got to get the air
leak taken care of. I'm have a well contractor come in to look at
it. They will have to pull the pipes and pump out of the well and
inspect them.
Anyone run into this? Anyone heard of lightning affecting ground
water like this?
Comments invited.
Ron
|
58.328 | Similar problem in NH | SALEM::HENRICKSON | | Fri Jul 28 1989 13:10 | 14 |
| Ron, I had a similar experience some years ago in NH. Yes, a near
strike can travel to your well and upset the ground-water flow as
well as your system. After all, isn't your well a perfect ground
rod?? We did some research with well contractors and got all the
same answers. Our system had a cracked pipe about 15' or so off
the check valve after the hit, along with the sediment problem for
a few days.
Incidently, you may have to clean out the strainers in all your
faucets and your washing machine if you don'y have a whole-house
filter. All that debris coming up is going to run through your
system.
Good luck.
|
58.329 | Toilet Tanks also! | HPSTEK::BARTON | | Fri Jul 28 1989 13:33 | 12 |
| Ron,
I saw something similiar once. A lightning bolt hit a house and
traveled through the house to the entry water pipe. Upon leaving the
house it dug the cleanest, neatest trench accross the front lawn!
Only thing I can add to .1 is to also clean the toilet tanks of
debris also. A sad story about clogged toilet bowls starts out with
well sand getting into the toilet tanks. Gets a little expense,
quickly.
Bill.
|
58.330 | chech out your pump too | TPVAX1::MCELROY | | Mon Jul 31 1989 11:14 | 12 |
| Ron,
I not only had several cases of the water being disturbed, but lost
two in-ground pumps within 18 months. Both pumps were reduced to
junk by lightning... the second case also made a hole in the pipe
about 10 feet above the pump! Some wells are located in just the
wrong place. Could be iron in the surrounding rock or just the way
the energy travels. The third replacement pump we put in we dropped
another twenty feet and to my knowledge there hasn't been any problem
since.
Peter
|
58.331 | And now the rest of the story! | AKOV12::GODIN | Just a Subroutine in the SW of life | Tue Aug 01 1989 12:51 | 20 |
| Well! Well! Here's an update to anyone interested. I had to have
the pump replaced. This was done yesterday. They (Bill Marden Well
& Pump of Fitchburg) pulled out the pump (360 feet deep) but couldn't
find any visable damage. But the new one works find.
I was surprise that when he was pulling up the old pump (the pipe
was in 20 foot sections) that there wasn't any safety line to the
pump. If in the process of pulling the pump up, the pipe broke,
I would have had to have a new well drilled. The new pump and 360
of continuous pipe was installed. I like the idea of one long pipe
section. No threads to strip or connections to leak!
We have a whole house water filter and I'll be changing that a few
times until the water clears.
Hope this doesn't mean that my well is an easy target for lightning!
Ron
|
58.332 | Hope it's enough protection | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Alive and Well in Wastefield | Thu Aug 03 1989 07:58 | 9 |
| Ron,
I had the same problem with my submerged pump a few years ago. I
now have a surge box the is suppose to protect it from frying the
pump in case of a close strike. I suppose it might happen again
but I hope not. The bill only came to $100 because Metpay covered
replacement cost of the pump and I had only changed to Metpay 1
month before. (nice of them to pay the other $500)
Jim
|
58.84 | What's the process for chlorinating a well? | AISG::ALIZIO | | Thu Aug 03 1989 15:03 | 28 |
|
After reading each and every reply within this note I'm still confused
as to how to chlorinate a shallow well in order to reduce the
coliform count. I have seen references stating that you need anywhere
from a 5% clorox solution up to 10 gallons of straight bleach! Can
anyone advise me on how to chlorinate my well?
Some details: The well is approximately 16 feet deep. It is made out
of sections of 4' round cement pipes. I would guess
that at any one time that the well has about 8' of water
in it. I'm not sure what this works out to in volume,
but I don't think it is much more than 500-700 gallons?
I'm sure someone can accurately figure this out for me.
The top section of pipe stick out of the ground by about
2'. There is a small chunk of cement missing from this
top pipe where it meets the cement cover. I don't think
any animal could have crawled in there, but who knows.
I'm going to slide the cover off and take a look before
I proceed further anyway.
My septic system is about 200' away and in back of the
house. My well is in the front yard.
I'd like to know the correct process to chlorinate the well and
how much bleach (or whatever) to use. Can anyone supply details
on this? Thanks.
|
58.85 | Use liquid pool shock - 1 gal per 10000 | CSMET2::CHACE | let's go fishin' | Fri Aug 04 1989 10:25 | 29 |
|
With 8' of water in a 4' wide pipe you have almost exactly 700
gallons. There are two ways you can chlorinate the water; either
a small amount on a continuous basis, or you can do what is called
superchlorinte it. Superchlorinating will kill everything alive
in the well AND will burn up any organic matter and most (if not
all) compounds. I do not know how to tell you how much chlorine
to use if you want to do it on a daily basis, but I can tell you
how much to use to superchlorinate it. The idea is that you have
to get the chlorine level up to between 5-10 PPM. (ordinary sanitizing
strength is 1-1.5 PPM)
Go to a pool supply store and get liquid chlorine shocker. This
should have ~12% chlorine. You will need to add the liquid shocker
at the rate of 1 gallon of shock per 10000 gallons of water to get
the required chlorine level. This works out to 9 ounces for 700
gallons.
I have done this myself, with that in mind I can give you the following
notes of warning: It will take ~ 1-2 days for the chlorine to go
away. During this time there may be quite a smell. If there are
any minerals in your water esp. iron or manganese your water will
turn browninsh for a couple of days. Also liquid chlorine shocker
comes in at least 2 strengths that I know of. The better one (12%)
is the one you need to use for this job. The main idea is to get
the chlorine level up to 5-10 PPM (parts per million). This will
kill (and fry) *anything* in your well.
Kenny
|
58.333 | maloderous side effect | EUCLID::PETERSON | Panama has no 2nd ammendment | Wed Aug 09 1989 11:11 | 8 |
|
In my case, a couple of years ago I lost my pump to a lighning
strike, had the turbidity problems, and a very strong sulphur
smell to the water. According to the well guy, the lightning
had affected the acidic soil/water. I don't know about the
"why", but the problem did fade after a couple of days.
|
58.832 | Well-pump never shuts off! | BLADE::ANDRE | | Sat Aug 12 1989 17:41 | 35 |
| My water comes from a well. Last month I received a *huge* electric bill,
realized something was amiss, and isolated the problem to my well-pump ... which
had been running continuously for about the last month and a half!
So, I shut off the well-pump via the circuit breaker and proceeded to clean
the holding tank pressure switch with dust cleaner (this stuff is essentially a
can of aerosol propellant, used to clean fine parts and components). No good.
Then I tried adjusting the pressure at which the switch opened at, lowering it
until the switch would open. No dice.
Here are the symptoms:
. If there is enough pressure in the tank (system?), the switch will
remain open, that is, the pressure remains high enough to keep the
the pressure switch open, as long as I don't draw water. In fact,
it'll stay open for days.
. If I draw some water, reducing the pressure in the tank (system?),
then the pressure switch eventually closes, turning on my pump. It
never shuts off/opens up, though ... and therein lies my problem.
. If I manually open the pressure switch, after the tank (system?) is
pressurized by the pump, it stays open!
I finally called a plumber, who installed a new pressure switch. No change
in [the faulty[ behavior. The plumber scratches his head and announces "You
have a leak in the line between the house and the well-pump!". I say, "You're
joking, there's probably 60-75 feet between here and the well-head. I'd really
hate to dig a 4-5 foot trench for that distance to find a leak. Plus, if there
was a leak, wouldn't I eventually lose pressure, say over night, and the swicth
would close again?" No reply.
Does anyone have any idea's on this?
Thanks, Andr�
|
58.833 | You may need an electrician, not a plumber | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Madman | Sat Aug 12 1989 19:04 | 11 |
| If the pressure switch is the type that cuts off power to the pump and it's
not defective, then the pump must be getting power some other way. Either
there's a short circuit that bypasses the switch, or if the switch is in
the neutral side of the supply (i.e. miswired), there could be a short to
ground between the switched neutral feeding the pump and ground.
See if you can find out if the switch is in the neutral feed to the pump, and
check the voltage across the switch terminals. It should be 110V when the
switch is open, and 0 volts when it is closed.
-Mike
|
58.834 | | STAR::ANDRE | Andr� J. St. Laurent | Sun Aug 13 1989 13:17 | 9 |
| � If the pressure switch is the type that cuts off power to the pump and it's
� not defective, then the pump must be getting power some other way. Either
� there's a short circuit that bypasses the switch, or if the switch is in
� the neutral side of the supply (i.e. miswired), there could be a short to
� ground between the switched neutral feeding the pump and ground.
No, the pump isn't getting power some other way. That is, when the pressure
switch is open (that is, when there's enough pressure to keep the switch open),
then the pump is NOT running.
|
58.835 | A couple of ideas. | WORDS::DUKE | | Sun Aug 13 1989 14:36 | 19 |
|
I doubt there is a leak in the line (water) coming from the
well to the tank. If there were, the system would not hold
pressure with the pump off. If I am not mistaken, the foot
(check) valve that holds water from returning to the well is
at the bottom of the well. If that valve were defective or
there were a leak anywhere, the system would loose pressure
quickly. The only thought I have at the moment is that the
pump is not able to bring the system pressure up to the point
where it is supposed to shut off. I would try setting the
cutout (high) pressure as low as possible. The switch should
indicate the range of the settings. Watch the pressure on
the tank and see if it ever gets to that point. If not, then
the pump is just not able to push water very well any more.
If the pressure goes considerably above the minimum cutout
setting, then it would sound like the new switch may be
defective (not an impossibility).
Peter Duke
|
58.836 | Clean the pressure line | POLAR::MACDONALD | | Mon Aug 14 1989 09:25 | 13 |
| I agree strongly with .3; I have had these systems and problems
for 25 years. Usually the new switch solves the problem, however
if there is a small line which transfers the pressure to the switch
it can get plugged with crap from the system, enough to keep the
system running for no apparent reason. Remove this small line, clean
it thoroughly and the point at which it joins the pressure-side
of the system.
Barring that, the standard pressure control has two screw adjustments;
look at the instructions and back off the high pressure to check
on .3, also be careful not to lower it below the low pressure setting.
Keep Pluggin'
|
58.837 | | ACUTE::THOMAS | Rich Thomas | Mon Aug 14 1989 11:31 | 19 |
| I believe you have a leak outside the house, most likely at the
wellhead. My reasoning is as follows.
I assume you have a check valve between the pump and holding tank
if you have a submersible pump. This is usually located at the tank
and would prevent pressure loss after the pump shuts off.
Second, if there were no leak, you would build up enough pressure
to activate the pressure relief valve and flood your basement if
the pump ran continuously. Submersible pumps can generate well over
100PSI resulting a dangerous situation if an over pressure relief
is not provided.
I'd start by digging down the side of the wellhead to the point
where the pipe exits the casing (about 4 feet) and see if that's
where the leak is.
/Rich
|
58.838 | Check for excess ground moisture | MLTVAX::OLEARY | | Mon Aug 14 1989 13:44 | 17 |
| We had a leak outside of our house. We didn't notice the continual
running of the pump -- the pump's in the well, and I only hear the
pump turn on if the house is quiet.
We did notice the wet lawn! So wet that we sunk in the muddy lawn to
our ankles. We dug down to the pipe in that area and sure 'nuf, the
pipe was leaking.
We'd had a cement truck go over that section of our lawn for a delivery
that week. I think that's why the pipe broke.
So, before you dig up the entire length of the pipe, you may want to
examine the ground covering the pipe for excess moisture.
- course this week this excess moisture EVERYWHERE!
-Nancy
|
58.839 | plugged line | DYO780::SCHAFER | Brad - back in Ohio. | Mon Aug 14 1989 15:37 | 19 |
| Is this a jet pump or a submersible pump?
The earlier posting about the pressure line being plugged up is
probably correct. We have incredibly hard water in this part of the
country (n/w Ohio) and I just got done replacing one of these boogers.
It was plugged solid with iron and lime deposits.
This line is usually flexible copper, and will run directly into your
shutoff switch (the thing the plumber replaced). I cleaned one once by
getting a piece of coathanger and ramming it down thru the line. (Of
course, I had to take the line completely off; if your line is in bad
shape, you'll probably poke a hole thru it doing this). In any event,
make sure you bleed off the pressure first, or you'll get a shower!
Also, if you have a jet pump, you'll probably not want to tackle this
yourself ... if you're not careful, the pump can lose its prime, and
repriming is a hassle.
-b
|
58.840 | air in the line | TWOBOS::LAFOSSE | | Tue Aug 15 1989 09:58 | 5 |
| A friend of mine had a pump that never shut off, constantly running.
it turn out to be air in the line. They bleed the lines and its
run great since.
Fra
|
58.841 | too much water in blatter?? | AKOV11::KALINOWSKI | | Tue Aug 15 1989 13:46 | 33 |
| Does your well go to an air blatter tank before going on to perform
important domestic functions for you and the family?
If the answer is yes rap the sucker with a large wrench lightly. does
it sound very tinny (it should ) ?
at what level is the "sweat" (i.e. condensation ) on the outside.
IS it only 1/10 to the tank height.
The reason I say this is that the blatter tank should be 80% air. Mine
has a way of filling with water every 6 months. When this happens,
the preasure switch is knocked for a loop, as it expects to be
compressing air and not a fluid. Because of this, the pump runs almost
all the time. On my unit, the inlet pipe has a tire-type air chuck just
before the preasure switch. When it has too much water, I shut down the
power to the pump, open the spickots the bath tub, and then I attach a
small air pump to the air chuck and fill it full of water. I only use
the cold water as I do not wish to drain the water heater. I then keep
it going until the bath tub runs out of water and tries blowing out
air.
I just shut the bathtub facuet, unhook the air pump, and switch the
pump back on. the first time this happened, I called the pump company.
They had a very nice heavy duty air pump that they charged me $50 to
pump my system with air. I went out and got a portable auto air pump
and spliced in 50 feet of zip cord. When I need to put in some air,
I just drive up to a window near my air blatter and hook the power to
my cigrette ligther. Not as fast, but the pump only costs 15 bucks and
it is handy for the beach or inflating tires, balls etc.
Hope this helps
john
|
58.842 | pipe connecting pressure switch to main water pipe | LAS057::LUND | | Tue Aug 15 1989 15:12 | 5 |
| I'd have to agree with the suggestion that it is the small pipe connecting
the pressure switch to the main water pipe being clogged. I had the same
problem once, with the pump not shutting off......
-- Stan
|
58.843 | nit picked :-) | ISLNDS::BELKIN | 6/*/74! | Tue Aug 15 1989 15:18 | 2 |
|
eerr.. pretty sure its air _____bladder_____ not _blatter_ !!!!!!!!!
|
58.86 | Solution feeder | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Thu Aug 17 1989 15:50 | 21 |
| If you have this problem on a continuing basis you may want to buy
a chlorinator. This is a small pump shich you wire to come on with
your well pump. It pumps a chlorene solution either into the well
(probably the best solution for you) or into your water system. In
the latter case you may have to add a "holding" or "blending" tank
to your system so the chlorene has time to act.
Unfortunatley, this is an on-going chore. You must check the
cholorene level in your water at least once or twice a week and
adjust the pump ot the strength of the solution to maitain the
proper level of chlorene. Periodically you'll also have to re-fill
the chlorene solution.
We have this type of system on a deep well and have a "blending"
tank in additon to our pressure tank. In additon to chlorene, we
add a neutralizing chemical to adjust the PH or our water. I test
the water about once a week and adjust as necessary. About every
3-4 weeks I mix up about 7 gallons of solution from water, liquid
chlorene bleach and the neutralizer chemical. Its a little more
bother than adding salt to the water softener, but not all that
bad.
|
58.844 | Is it fixed? | WORDS::DUKE | | Fri Aug 18 1989 08:27 | 6 |
|
Is the mystery solved? What is happening? Do you have
only where you want it or most everywhere you don't want it?
Peter Duke
|
58.822 | A few things you can do yourself first | VICKI::DODIER | | Mon Aug 21 1989 14:30 | 37 |
|
Re:0
What is your static level ? You can find out yourself what the
static level is approx. by removing the well cap and dropping a small
pebble down the pipe and timing how long it takes to hit water. Each
second equals roughly 25' so an 8 second drop would be 200' approx..
It's best to do this after you come back from a weekend trip where you
haven't used any water for awhile. You will also need to know how deep
your pump is down. You should be able to backtrack to the person that
original drilled the well to get that info.
If your pump was down 300' and your static level was 200', you
would have 100' of water. A typical well uses 9" pipe which is roughly
equal to 1 � gallons per foot so you'd have approx. 150 gallons.
Another thing you can do is a pump test. I would only do this
after using all the water you planned to use for the day so as to allow
recovery time. All this involves is hooking up a hose to your holding
tank and pumping your well dry. After its dry, wait about 5 minutes
and pump it out again only this time measure how much by filling a 5
gallon bucket (or something of a know volume such as a barrel)
multiple times until you've pumped the well dry again. Divide the number
of gallons into the minutes and this will tell you your approx.
recovery rate per minute.
Together, these things will give you a good idea of whether or not
you have a problem without costing you a dime. If you do have a
problem there are 3 basic choices you have. I could go into these
(from past experience) if anyone wishes but at least one is obvious,
a new well.
BTW - My next store neighbor had to go down 900' at a cost of $10k
for a new well. Although not common, there are typically NO guarantees
and you will have to pay usually on a per foot basis.
Ray
|
58.823 | a bit off! | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Mon Aug 21 1989 16:30 | 9 |
|
I think the 9" well is incorrect. The most common is 6" diameter and
the formula is 1� gallons per foot wit the 6" well. I had my well
sunk 700 feet,then hydrofracked, then had the pump installed at
480 feet with scedule 80 pvc pipe and 10/3 wire.I also have a 80
gallon holding tank and all this ran to $8600 bucks...
Wayne
|
58.845 | Call a well/pump company | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Mon Aug 21 1989 17:25 | 5 |
| I'm not able to guess what your problem is. However, I offer this
advice: Rather than a "plumber" get someone from a companyu that
installs wells and pumps to come look at it. Although some
plumbers are knowledgeable about wells and pumps, a company that
specialized in that business is possibly a better bet.
|
58.824 | Isn't schedul 80 RIDGID pipe? | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Aug 22 1989 17:28 | 10 |
| re: ,< Note 3357.5 by VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT "T.B.S."
> ... then had the pump installed at
> 480 feet with scedule 80 pvc pipe ...
If my memory is correct, schedule 80 is RIDGID pipe. If thats
right and PVC is glued (O.K. "solvent welded") together -- OUCH --
you will have one *BIG* headache when you need to pull the pump
someday! Our pump is also way down there, but on flexible pipe,
which makes getting it out much easier.
|
58.334 | Wires are connected | VICKI::DODIER | | Wed Aug 23 1989 11:27 | 6 |
| Re:4
If the pipe broke you'd still have the electrical connections
which in my case I believe are (3) 8 gauge solid copper wires.
Ray
|
58.825 | | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Wed Aug 23 1989 11:42 | 9 |
| The PVC is not glued. It has union connectors that have a special
"goop" that lub's and seals the threads. It can come apart. The
well company did not want to come back on a call because of somthing
that just made specs. So I now have the sced. 80 pipe and 10awg wire.
I do have flex pipe from the well to the house.One for wire and one
for water.
Wayne
|
58.826 | Dumb luck - maybe ??? | VICKI::DODIER | | Wed Aug 23 1989 15:39 | 26 |
| re:8
Although the formula you stated would probably work well for
a pebble free falling without making contact with anything, I don't
believe it would be as useful in this situation. You are dropping
a pebble into a 6" - 9" pipe with wires and PVC in it. The pebble will
most likely hit wires and/or, pipes on the way down causing it to stop/
slow down and reaccellerate. Since there is no way of telling for sure
how many times it will hit something, the best you can do is guess and
approximate using this method. (I never said it was accurate :-).
I used this method when I had problems with my well. I knew
my pump was down 400' and I did multiple tests using the 25 ft/sec.
as a guide and it appeared to be fairly accurate. When my pump was
sucking air I timed 16 seconds (+ or - 1 second) before I heard the
splash. My neighbor (who told me about this) also used the same method
on his well (when he had problems) with some degree of success. Maybe
it was coincidence or just dumb luck, but it worked, twice.
Ray
BTW - I don't recall enough of my physics to start quoting formulas.
I do however assume you are a typical DEC engineer as I believe the
formula you gave was the one used if your working in a vacuum (insert big
smiley face here ;-)
|
58.827 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Thu Aug 24 1989 09:58 | 19 |
| re: << Note 3357.7 by VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT "T.B.S." >>>
> The PVC is not glued. It has union connectors that have a special
> "goop" that lub's and seals the threads. It can come apart.
Well, thats a little better than being glued, but not much. When
you have to pull the pump you will find out how much FUN it is to
take all the pipe apart and the re-assemble it. (Naturally it will
be a cold night with either snow or freezing rain!)
(Note that I said "WHEN" not "IF". No pump lasts forever!)
Seriously, well companies have a winch truck that can pull a
flexible pipe in minutes. (It winds the pipe around a large,
6-foot or so diameter drum.) Disassembling the rigid pipe will
take hours. Also, there is no reason to think that the rigid pipe
is any better or that it will last longer than good flexible pipe.
In fact I wonder if the rigid pipe might even be more susceptible
to cracks from vibration?
|
58.828 | Oh well, .... | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Thu Aug 24 1989 10:59 | 12 |
|
I do not know how strong ridge pipeis to flex pipe. The pump (3/4
horse) is made from brass and stainless steel and is VERY heavy.I
would think that the flex would strech and break over time before
the ridge pipe would. Just a guess on my part there.
There are also many torque stops on the pipe.I am not worried about
twisting. I watched them put in the pipe,I don't think it will
take them longer that 1.5 to 2 hours to remove the pump.
Wayne
|
58.336 | strange behavior: water pumb & holding tank | 1SHOT::HOULE | Steve, NM is the future! | Thu Aug 24 1989 14:51 | 18 |
| Okay I read all the notes and i still have a mystery. Its a long story so lets
try the short version first.
After mucky around with my pump and holding tank (the long story) here's the
situation.
My pump cycles on at 30psi. Watching the gauge, The pressure climbs to 40,
quickly goes to 50 then JUMPS to 60 and the pump shuts off. Immediately the
pressure drops to 38-40. If I stop drawing water it stays there.
The high holding tank pressure is 38psi and the low is 20psi.
Can someone explain this behavior? What I want is 50psi! (at least).
Part of the mystery is that if I shut off the water into the house (after
the holding tank) while the pump is running , when it stops the pressure guage
remains at 50psi!!
At least after my mucking I got it to work this well; It was cycling on/off!
Thanks for your help! steve
|
58.337 | Waterlogged tank? | STAR::BECK | The question is - 2B or D4? | Thu Aug 24 1989 14:57 | 6 |
| It *sounds* like your holding tank is waterlogged (insufficient air).
On a humid day, the condensation on the outside of the holding tank
should be an indication of how the water is. My experience (and one
of the "homeowner's user's manual" type books) suggests that the water
level shouldn't be more than about 2/3 to 3/4 of the way up the tank
when it's pressurized (i.e. when the pump shuts off).
|
58.338 | tank is 1/4 full
| 1SHOT::HOULE | Steve, NM is the future! | Thu Aug 24 1989 15:48 | 9 |
| Thats what i can fast response.. but
Ishould have said in my first note.
My holding tank has about 1/4 water. When I was mucking someone told me it
should be 1/2 put I couldn't/didn't get it above 1/4.
But maybe something is wrong with the membrane?
Mor info: If I turn off the pump I do get a substantial amount of water/pressure
from the tank.
Thanks for the reply, steve -what a mystery!
|
58.339 | Check your precharge pressure too!! | CSMET2::CHACE | I'm the NRA | Fri Aug 25 1989 10:12 | 9 |
|
Maybe you have TOO much precharge air pressure in your tank. With
the system completly drained and NO pressure showing on the guage,
your tank should have an air pressure *equal* to the pump turn 'on'
pressure. For example, if your pump turns on at 20psi - then you
should have an air charge of 20psi in your tank "WHEN THERE'S NO
WATER IN IT!!" Try that.
Kenny
|
58.340 | Probably not the membrane | FRSBEE::WEIER | | Sun Aug 27 1989 00:12 | 10 |
| When the membrane in our overflow tank went, the mostnoticeable
'charactersitic' was that the water leaked all over the basement
floor since the overflow tank wasn't able to hold as much pressure,
the overflow valve in the hot water heater opened up.
Probably unrelated, but the cause was the water company installed
a new pumping station down the street from our house, and increased
our incoming water pressure by so much that it blew the bladder
in the overflow tank. Anyway, based on what we saw when the membrane
was gone, unless you're leaking, I would guess that you're overflow
tank is probably okay. ... I think ... (-:
|
58.829 | Plastic is the way to go unless.... | VICKI::DODIER | | Mon Aug 28 1989 11:37 | 8 |
| FWIW - I was told that the plastic pipe is good to a maximum
of 600' and if you have to go down any further you must have rigid
pipe (per Water Center in Bedford which I WOULDN'T recommend BTW)
Also, the winch truck mentioned previously does make fairly
quick work of pulling the flexible pipe.
Ray
|
58.341 | In Much beter shape | 1SHOT::HOULE | Steve, NM is the future! | Wed Aug 30 1989 09:45 | 13 |
| Thanks to re .1 & re .2. Between the two of these I thought what I need is
to add more air to make it equal to my pumb "turn-on" setting.
So I did that. First I make the low pressure in the tank reading 29psi; 30 psi
was my pump turn-on pressure. This gave me the following results: When the
pump kicked off the gauge dropped down to 50 psi (up 10) --- just what I wanted!
Next I raised the pump turn-on presure to 40psi; 30 was too low when taking
a shower. I wonder if I should add more air?
When I was scanning this notesfile I saw that the low setting in the tank
should be equal to the outside pressure. This sure contradicts my results!!
Thanks again for you help. Steve
|
58.1055 | Home only 9 months old, well went dry | CVG::EDRY | This note's for you | Tue Sep 05 1989 13:40 | 17 |
| I have a problem and would like to know if anyone can shed some light.
This may/may not be appropriate for this notes file, if not, can any-
one suggest a better place to ask?
We bought a new construction home last decemeber from a contractor.
The problem is that we have well water, but our well is now dry. Has
anyone else been through this and can shed some advise.
I realize I'll have to speak with an attorney about this, but
may there be an "implied waranty for fitness of use?" We've only been
in the home for none months and certainly don't need this type of problem.
This is NH.
- Bob
[crossposted in CONSUMER , HOME_WORK and REAL_ESTATE]
|
58.1056 | I would think so.... | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Thu Sep 07 1989 17:02 | 12 |
|
We just bought a newly built house. My house is guaranteed for a
year ( I believe that's the law even in New Hampshire ) and as with
most every newly built house certain things will go wrong. I've had
our developer and his contractors back at least a dozen times to
fix things. I would assume that since the house is not livable
without water, by law, the developer must remedy the situation out
of his pocket.
Mike
----
|
58.685 | Help, send mail!! | NRADM::KING | It shouldn't hurt to be a child!!!!!!! | Thu Sep 07 1989 23:44 | 21 |
| Another well-water-pressure problem... I've read all the notes
in here about artesian well stuff and now I'm stumped... A little
background on this problem...
Our well usually have about 20-40 PSI pressure..now we can't get
about 20. The pressure is there about 2 minutes then drops down
to about 5-8 PSI. The tank is empty with only air in there. I've
tried letting all the pressure out and hand-pumping the pressure
up to 28 PSI. After running the water it drops down to 5-8
again... I've tried to adjust the 2 springs that shut the pump off
but nothing changes... The pump seems to stay on all the time to
maintain the pressure at 18 PSI... thats the highest it will go...
BTW, the pressure has gone down over the last 2 weeks but we thought
it was because of the shortage of water but now we wonder...
I'm looking for any ideas or some one I can call for help!!!
Rick
PS, I live in Lunenburg, Mass...
|
58.1057 | You're covered | MARX::SULLIVAN | There's a time and a place for spontaneity | Fri Sep 08 1989 13:26 | 1 |
| That law also applies in Mass.
|
58.1058 | | CVG::EDRY | This note's for you | Mon Sep 11 1989 09:58 | 15 |
|
RE: .1
Yes, I believe as well that the builder is liable. Of course, he
doesn't and refuses to spend a dime to remedy the situation.
Here's we things get bad, since the builder seems stead fast against
fixing the problem he leaves me no alternative.
First I must fix the problem myself and then seek leagal recourse
to recover. The real kicker is that even if I prevail in the lawsuit, I'm
still responsible for my own attorney's fees which can easily be 2-3K or more!!
There is no justice!
|
58.1059 | Double or Triple Damages-Consumer Laws | CECV01::SELIG | | Mon Sep 11 1989 11:23 | 22 |
| You may be able to recover the legal fees.......depending on what
NH law allows.
A friend of mine who bought a new house in Acton,MA. had problems
with water leakage in his basment. The builder ample drainage
under the foundation. The lawyer told my friend that the first
step was for him (the lawyer) to send a Chapter ##?? Demand Letter
to the builder via registered mail. If the builder failed to respond
and comply, the lawyer claimed that the laws allowed the
consumer/homeowner to seek double of triple damages.
The end result was that builder, who refused to return my friends
calls, called the lawyer in response the demand letter, within 2
days to offer a settlement. The builder payed the full cost for
B-Dry Syetms to waterproof the basement. Lawyers fee was $200-300
for consultation, letter, and settlement negotiation.
I believe, had they gone to court, the lawyer was willing to take
the case on a contingency basis, since he felt it was a "sure WIN".
Good luck,
Jonathan
|
58.1060 | | CVG::EDRY | This note's for you | Mon Sep 11 1989 11:31 | 14 |
|
In mass the statue that allows for "trebble damages" and attorney's
fees is call 93A.
In NH, there is a law on the books to allow double and tripple damages,
but the law is intedned to be used in "cases involving fraudulent and deceptive"
business practices, and during preliminary discussions with an attorney, he
felt that I didn't have a good case for that.
He does feel that I have a good case by way of implied warranty
for habitability (non-performance of contact), but he didn't indicate that
I could collect anything other than material damages and also seemed to
indicate that I was responsible for my own attorney'd fess.
|
58.686 | Faulty Check Valve ??? | GYPSY::GOETZ | | Mon Sep 11 1989 12:16 | 4 |
| You may have had a check valve go bad on you. Hopefully, it's
not at the bottom of your well.
Good luck.
|
58.687 | Check the line! | SALEM::GINGRAS | | Mon Sep 11 1989 15:22 | 5 |
| I had a similar problem on a dug well system. It turned out to
be a crack in the line that allowed air to get into the system.
The pump would run, until shut off manually. If allowed to sit,
ALL of the water would drain back into the well, thus giving the
symptoms of a bad check valve.
|
58.1061 | 93A probably not relavent | VINO::DZIEDZIC | | Tue Sep 12 1989 08:03 | 7 |
| I sued my builder for basement water leakage in Mass about two
years ago. Statute 93A only allows double/triple damages IF
the actions by the builder were clearly fraudulent. Claiming
the problem is not his responsibility, or accepting responsibility
but never doing anything can NOT be consider fraudulent (at least
according to the judge's opinion in my case). He did agree to
attorney's fees, though.
|
58.846 | Final outcome | STAR::ANDRE | Andr� J. St. Laurent | Thu Sep 14 1989 17:18 | 41 |
| Well, I finally called the New England Pump Company. They came out and
determined that it was a break in the pipe between the pump and the point at
which it joins the line running to the house. The way they did this was to pull
the well pipe up and removed (actually hacksawed off, see below) one 20-foot
length of PVC pipe, and then screw a pressure gauge onto the pipe leading down
to the water pump. Then they turned on the pump (via the circuit breaker in my
basement). The old geezer from the well-pump company declared that "we ought to
see at least 100 PSI on this-here gauge". The best we got was just about 40
PSI, therefore there must be a break somewhere between the gauge and the pump.
The solution, I'm told, is to pull each section of pipe until the broken
section is found, replace it, and then lower it back down. So they began
pulling pipe. Unfortunately, whoever put the pipe in glued each 20-foot section
of PVC pipe together at the threads. This meant that each piece of pipe had to
be hacksawed off, and couldn't be re-used ... meaning that I had to buy 14 new
20-foot lengths of pipe (pump depth was 280 feet). It gets worse ...
As they're pulling pipe they notice that the three-wire power cable (the one
that supplies the pump with power) is worn through right down to the copper.
In fact, after patching the 5th bare spot with black electrician's tape they
suggested that perhaps I'd want to put new wire down. Since they had to pull
the entire 280 feet of pipe to replace it anyway, we had a chance to see just
how bad the wire was. It was awful. I have to believe that some amount of
current was being shorted to ground through the water. Then we got to the pump.
The pump looked okay, however was dated 1972, seventeen years old. Since the
average life of a pump is 15 years, this one could have been on its last legs.
So the old geezer asks if I want a new pump. No pressure. No suggested course
of action from the old guy. Just a question. "Hmmm," says I, as I rub my chin,
"what do you think?" "Well, it's up to you." he replies. I start thinking
about the $1/foot ($280) it'll cost me if I have to pull the well pipe again to
replace the pump, versus the cost of putting a new pump in there while
everything's pulled. A new pump is $470. If this thing goes in the middle of
winter, it'll cost me $280 plus $470 ... and the pump is two years past life
expectancy. I decided to replace the pump with a new one.
Total cost for new pump, 14 20-foot lengths of pipe, wire and labor was
slightly more than $1000. One week later I received an offer on my house
(yep, it was for sale). I'm sure there's a moral in here somewhere ...
Andr�
|
58.940 | Q: How to unhook a pitless adapter in a drilled well? | MEIS::TOWNSEND | Erik S. Townsend (DTN) 247-2436 | Mon Oct 02 1989 16:52 | 57 |
| Well I looked through the keyword directory, and couldn't find anything
close, so please accept my apologies if this is a repeat question.
I have a drilled well with a submersible pump at a vacation house. The
plumbing is seasonal (this is the first season), and the plan is to drain
the well line from the house back to the pitless by blowing compressed
air at it from the house end. The point is that the well line couldn't
be kept below the frost line, because of ledge.
To accomplish this, the pitless adapter, accessible only inside the
well casing at this time, needs to be unhooked, briefly, so that the
water can be blown back. Otherwise, we'd be fighting the pump, which
wouldn't work (Even though the power will be off, we can't blow water
backwards through the pump).
The pitless is about 4' down below the cap, so obviously, its not a matter
of reaching in and unhooking it. I believe (?) that the way its set up,
what must be done is to pull the inside fitting up, and it pops out of
a gravity-dependant fitting of some kind. As I remember from watching the
guy install the thing, it looks something like:
| |
| |
(well casing) | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| Threaded fitting | | |
| | | |
| +==========
| | w w w w ->
| | w +====
| | w | |
| +| w |+ |
| | w | |
| | w | |
| | w | |
| | w | |
| | w | |
| | w | |
The "w"'s are where water goes. Where it says "Threaded Fitting", I think
this is a pipe fitting where you can screw in a piece of pipe, and pull
up to unhook the pitless from some kind of receptacle mounted to the well
casing. (Or, I could be totally wrong, also).
What I think I need to know is, what size pipe, and what kind of thread
do I need, in order to screw into the pitless thingie so as to open it
up in order to facilitate letting the water flow from the well line back
down into the well?
Does this make any sense at all? Does anyone know what size pipe/tool I
need to make? Is there maybe some standard well-yanker-outer tool I can
buy at a ??? store to make this all easier?
Erik (Who knows very little about this, as may be apparent)
|
58.941 | thoughts... | OASS::B_RAMSEY | 4 wheeling... | Mon Oct 02 1989 18:49 | 13 |
| Have you tried contacting the installer of the pump? He can probably
give the thread size and possibly clues to where to buy the "puller
outer tool".
The size of the pipe you are using to drain your water system depends
on how long you are willing to wait to let the water drain and how
much water you have to drain. The more water to move, and the less
time you want to wait, the bigger the pipe you need. The less water
and/or the longer you are willing to wait for it to drain, the smaller
the pipe you need. The size of the opening in your well line is
the restricting factor. A bigger pipe than the opening will not
speed the flow or lessen the time. A small pipe will slow the flow
and increase the time.
|
58.942 | No pipe req'd for draining | 15757::TOWNSEND | Erik S. Townsend (DTN) 247-2436 | Tue Oct 03 1989 11:37 | 8 |
| re .1
I don't want to use a pipe to drain anything - the only purpose of
the pipe I mentioned would be to get ahold of the fitting to pull it up
out of the way. Then, the water would run directly into the well casing, and
fall by gravity down to the bottom of the well.
Erik
|
58.943 | "T" handle, way to go | CSCMA::LEMIEUX | | Tue Oct 03 1989 14:04 | 11 |
| Hi,
If my memory serves me, 3/4" pipe thread is the size thread
that is in the Pitless. All you have to do, is make a "T" handle
that will reach down to the Pitless, thread the "T" handle into
the Pitless pull up...not usually as easy as it sounds...and hang
on tight, so as not to lose the whole thig into the well casing
up to the "T" handle.
To reinstall, just reverse the procedure.
Good luck
|
58.944 | Have a Drain Valve Installed | IOENG::MONACO | | Wed Oct 04 1989 14:18 | 20 |
| mmmmmm
Removing a pitless adapter may not be a simple task. Depending
on how much 1" pipe filled with water with a big anchor "pump"
with torque supressors you may need some HEAVY duty lifting
equipment to remove hold and replace the adapter into the seat.
ie a truck with a boom pulled my pump & 500ft of pipe to repair
a leak.
You should look at have a valve installed in the line near the well
that will let you shut off the water and drain it back into a pit.
Relatives had this set up at a vacation home in HN. They simply
took out a key (similar to water company key for a shut off valve)
inserted it into a setup like you would have at the street for water.
and gave a couple of turns. All the pipes were set up for gravity
feed back towards the well so open all the valves in the house and
the water took care of itself. BTW They did not have a check valve at
the tank in the house, if you have one you need to by-pass it.
Don
|
58.945 | Success! | MEIS::TOWNSEND | Erik S. Townsend (DTN) 247-2436 | Tue Oct 10 1989 13:58 | 20 |
| re .4
Good point, but it turns out that my well is only 130' and between
plastic pipe and a not-that-heavy pump, the lifting is no big deal.
re .3, general
I got my problem solved, but thought I'd throw in the details in
case anyone ever runs into the same problem.
Its a 1" pipe thread (not 3/4"). The T-Handle described by .3 is
definately the way to go. To make one, get a 6' section of 1" pipe, and
a 1" T-joint fitting. Cut two 6" sections off the pipe. You now have a 5'
section, and two 6" sections. Thread all ends of everything, and screw them
together. You now have a 5' long T-handle tool with a 1' T on the top. When
(not if) you drop it, the T-handle saves the day.
Thanks for the info!
Erik
|
58.688 | 2 hour turnaround... | DCSVAX::COTE | No, Kelly. I said *wits*... | Mon Oct 16 1989 14:08 | 15 |
| This seems like an appropriate note...
My pump started leaking Friday night (when else?). At 8:45 this morning
I left it with Fairbanks Engineering on Pullman St. in Worcester.
Two hours later they called me to tell me it was finished. A bad motor
bearing had caused the shaft to (a) wear out and (b) ruin the seal
that keeps water from leaking.
The bill came to $199.96. ("Keep the change...") While I could have
bought a brand new unit from Somerville or some such, I can't help
but wonder what would happen if I needed support sometime down the
road. This is a 20 year old unit. I can't recommend Fairbanks enough.
Edd
|
58.830 | WELL EXPERIENCE | SPGBAS::HARBOLD | | Wed Nov 01 1989 10:36 | 28 |
| My background is that I married into a family of water well
contractors and have lived with well water for 12 years and the
following is based on the above. First, if a well is not producing
enough water it can be from changes underground where the water veins
have dried or gotten clogged. Either way, you can solve the problem in
three ways. The first is to add bulk storage and put the pump on a
timer that will assure that the tank is filled during low usage times.
For the situation here, this might be a good solution since the problem
is not serious. Even a well that can only produce 2 gallons a minute
can use this method to provide enough water.
The second way is to drill the original well deeper. A Rotary drill
can drop a well very quickly, but will tend to seal up smaller water
veins. A compress drill (old fashioned) drills slower and tends to
open up the water veins. This requires that the well casings and other
aspects be in good shape. Anything over 5 gallons a minute is good.
On the question of the type of pipe to use. I had flexible plastic
down about 90 feet and in time the flexing of the submergible pump
caused the pipe to crack. The flexing can also cause the electric
wires to deteriorate. The current recommendation for a first class
installation is the use of pipe with threaded joints. The expectation
is that this installation will outlast the pump. With proper tools,
the pump can be raised without too much problem. Plastic is cheap and
the cost of fixing is cheaper, but I prefer the threaded pipe because
you can forget it.
The last option and most expensive is to drill a new well.
|
58.831 | oops,forgot one! | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Wed Nov 01 1989 11:15 | 14 |
|
.13 forgot one more way. Its called hydrofracking. I had my well done
and it worked!!!!!!!! It works by running compressed air into the well
at various points. The pressure in the well can run up to 2,000 psi.
This is supposed to open clogged cracks and possiblly make them larger.
My well is 700 feet deep and was making about .5 gallons per hour.The
static level was over 400 feet deep. After fracking the well I was
making over 6 gallons an hour and my static level was 20 feet down.
Expect to pay 1200 to 2500 bucks...
Wayne
|
58.847 | Same problem - too much power consumption. | PKENT::KENT | Peter Kent - SASE, 223-1933 | Sat Nov 04 1989 16:13 | 25 |
| I have a similar story to tell. I was trying to trace the source of
what seemed to be an unusually high (compared to the neighbors)
electric bill. I found that the pump almost never turned off. I
called a well pump company and they came out and replaced what was a 13
year old pump. They put in a heftier one - from 1/3 to 1/2 horsepower
for a pump that sits at 130 feet below the surface. The result was
that I am now saving about 8.5 kwh per day. I also had them raise the
water pressure so that the pump shuts off at 60 pounds instead of 40
pounds. It's wonderful now that you can shower and someone else can
also use the water.
The cost was $621. including installation of the pump and starter.
They didn't have to replace anything else. The company was Need Pump
in Sterling, Ma. I would recommend them - they were fast and checked
everything out before they left and put some chlorine down the well.
They even checked the flow rate to be sure there was not a problem with
that.
What was interesting was how the vertical pipe in the well is connected
to the horizontal pipe that goes to the house. That connection is done
about 6 feet below the surface. The vertical pipe is simply pulled up
from a shoulder like connection that is maintained by the weight of the
pipe and pump.
Peter
|
58.946 | Well insufficient - previous owner knew - legal recourse? | WAGON::ELARAB | | Mon Nov 20 1989 20:43 | 36 |
| Hi all...
Well Well Well where is the water?
Our first week of home ownership we found we had a problem with
the well...
As it turns out the problem with our well is that it is out
of water. The previous owner admits that there were some problems
with the well and he claims to have had it hydrofractured 2
weeks before closing, but did not bother to tell us about it.
Now we are out of water often he has offered to deepen the well
100 feet he claims this will give us 150 gallons more which he
says is half the needs of 2 people.
My question is does what he say make sense?
Shouldn't he deepen the well already at 425 feet till we get more
water?
What recourse do we have?
What is a sufficient depth?
How much water is considered normal usage?
Our lawyer said talk to him about it and if he had prior knowledge
(which he did) he is responsible for fixing the problem. This would
mean we need to drill till we get water which might not happen, and
then sue him. An alternative I'd rather not persue.
I would like to hear any advice you have to offer.
Thanks,
Muhammad
|
58.947 | This note re-opened by request of the author | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Nov 22 1989 08:28 | 5 |
| Note 3470 deals with a dry well in a new house, this deals with a barely
adequate well in an existing house. The legal ramifications are different
enough to warrant a separate note.
Paul
|
58.1075 | Leaking "pressure" valve --- HELP | JUPITR::HOFFMAN | | Wed Nov 29 1989 09:00 | 24 |
| I have well water and a pressure tank and the water is now starting
to drip from a fitting near the pressure tank. The fitting looks like
a pressure relief valve, but a variation that I have never seen. The
dripping started about a week ago and I was able to eliminate the drip
by turning in the end of the valve, but I guess that the bandaide was
only temporary. This afternoon I was going to replace the valve with
a spicket, only because I have one and it has the same diameter stem.
Before I totally mess things up, can anybody suggest any other
solution, any local (Worcester area) supplier of valves, purpose of
"pressure" valve (and if it is a pressure valve).
pump If you can follow my
|| diagram, the location of my
pressure || dripping "pressure" valve is
tank = =|| noted.
||====== house water system
"pressure" XX
valve XX
Thanks for all replies.
Al
|
58.1076 | BE CAREFUL! | ACUTE::THOMAS | Stop, look and listen | Wed Nov 29 1989 10:36 | 12 |
| DO NOT ELIMINATE THE PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE! It's purpose is to release
excess pressure in the event the pump fails to shut off. Without
a pressure relief valve this could result in an explosion capable
of inflicting major damage to the house and loss of life to anyone
in the vicinity.
Before replacing the valve, I'd check to see that the tank pressure
is within normal operating range. The pump should shut off no higher
than 60 PSI. If the pressure is okay, get a replacement pressure
relief valve. I think mine is rated for 70 PSI which is the maximum
working pressure for most tanks. Sommerville lumber carries the
valve you need.
|
58.1077 | Hoping for that dry floor | 27748::HOFFMAN | | Wed Nov 29 1989 13:29 | 6 |
| Thanks for the response. I replaced the washer in the valve and
will check for further leaks tonight. The washer did have ridges in
the seat area which I hope was the cause of the leak. What I do not
understand is if the valve had never operated why a washer / valve seat
would leak.
|
58.458 | where's the pressure going?? | DINSCO::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Fri Dec 29 1989 14:17 | 20 |
| I've got the same symptom, but I don't think it's the same problem.
I have a Sears "best" captive-air, dual-feed jet pump system. It was
cycling every minute or so, even though no one's using any water.
To check, I turned off the main feed to the house. Pump goes on at 25
pounds. Pump goes off at 50 pounds. Then pressure slowly drops, but no
water is going to the house.
So, I open up the impeller housing and look around. Nothing is obviously
wrong. I put it all back together, and now it takes three or four minutes
to cycle.
The only thing I can think of is that there's a leak of some sort back into
the well. Does this sound reasonable to anyone out there? Any advice on
what to look for?
Ray
(I also need to charge the tank, but I have to get my bicycle pump fixed
before I can do that. It never ends...)
|
58.459 | gotta be a leak of some sort | DINSCO::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Fri Dec 29 1989 20:33 | 4 |
| Well, now that the tank is properly charged, it takes an hour to cycle.
Anyone know how a jet pump works?
Ray
|
58.460 | | CSSE32::APRIL | If you build it .... he will come ! | Wed Jan 03 1990 15:50 | 8 |
| >Well, now that the tank is properly charged, it takes an hour to cycle.
>Anyone know how a jet pump works?
You have an air leak somewhere in the system. Try dropping the
charge to 45 PSI.
Chuck
|
58.689 | Air mixed with water... | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Get rid of that heater. | Wed Jan 03 1990 16:24 | 12 |
|
Our well and holding/expansion tank system has worked adequately since we
bought our house a little over a year ago. But for the past month, for some
reason lots of air has been coming out of the faucets/toilets when the
water runs. Enough water still, but lots of air coming through in the pipes
along with the water.
What is the cause, and how can this be fixed?
Thanks
Steve
|
58.461 | | EUCLID::PETERSON | Panama has no Second Amendment | Thu Jan 04 1990 13:31 | 8 |
|
Our well is outside, on top of the well, at the bottom of a hill.
after burning out a motor, the well guy suggested an "absorber"
on top of the well, to absorb the shock from the water column
and the cycling of the pump as the pressure switch went on and
off-trying to absorb the shock itself. No problems it three years.
|
58.690 | Air check valve? | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Jan 05 1990 13:37 | 9 |
| Have you got an air release valve in your system? I have a holding/
expansion tank that has no built-in air check valve -- I have a separate
tank with an air check valve. It got fouled with iron sediment and
quit working. In my case, not working meant that water continuously
pouring out the air release, rather than air not coming out the air release,
but perhaps a different design could fail in a less catastrophic fashion.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
58.691 | Air in pipes = Air in pump inlet | AIAG::HOGLUND | Gary Hoglund | Fri Jan 05 1990 16:47 | 24 |
| re. 2259.12
Air coming out of the faucets/toilets is due to a leak on the inlet side of
your pump. Check for leaks:
* Fittings on the inlet side of the pump may have work themselves
loose. (I had this problem with some plastic pipe fittings that worked
loose due to vibration of the pump.)
* The well casing may have a leak. (I'm not sure how to check for this one
except to extract the casing from the ground and redo all the fittings.)
* Depending on the type of well, the filter screen used at the bottom inlet
of the well may have become clogged. (I had a driven point well that
failed prematurely due to a clogged filter screen on the point. The
screen was damaged during installation.) If the filter screen is clogged
it causes the pump to draw harder which can cause air leaks to develop.
Hope this helps. I lived with this problem a while (~4 months) before deciding
to drill a new well to replace the "cheap" driven point well installed by the
builder.
Gary
|
58.462 | charge is only 25 psi? | DINSCO::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Sat Jan 06 1990 12:14 | 22 |
| Thanks for your interest.
re: .8
> You have an air leak somewhere in the system. Try dropping the
> charge to 45 PSI.
Chuck,
I'm not sure I understand.
I have a bladder tank; the air and the water are separate.
Per the directions on the tank, I turned off the pump, ran water until none
left, and then pressurized the tank to a bit below the cut-in pressure of
27 psi. This air isn't going anywhere (at least, not quickly. It's still
25 psi a week later.) Are you referring to an air leak somewhere else?
What I *think* I have is a water leak; that I *think* is going back down
the well (at least, it acts that way). What part of the system keeps the
water from going back down the well?
Ray
|
58.463 | | EUCLID::PETERSON | Panama has no Second Amendment | Mon Jan 08 1990 13:59 | 10 |
|
The check valve at the pump outlet.
Also check for wet spots between the well and the house. Have any
large trucks driven across the aarea that the water line is in?
Even a line 4 ft deep can be hurt if a large heavy truck drives
over it. That happened to my folks years ago after the septic
pumper drove over it.
|
58.464 | leaky check valve sounds probable; thanks | DINSCO::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Mon Jan 08 1990 19:16 | 15 |
| re: .11
> The check valve at the pump outlet.
I take it you mean the one at the end of the pipe at the bottom of the
well? I may try to wait until spring before I check this out (or pay the
plumber). Unfortunately (for me), I think you've cracked the problem.
> Also check for wet spots between the well and the house. Have any
> large trucks driven across the aarea that the water line is in?
Luckily, this can't happen in my yard 8^) (Of course, the water line could
have sprung a leak for some other perverse reason...)
Ray
|
58.465 | Pump it up ! | CSSE32::APRIL | If you build it .... he will come ! | Tue Jan 09 1990 12:48 | 8 |
|
Some systems have more than one check-valve. There usually is
one at the end of the line (the one submerged in water) and there
can be a check-valve at the entrance to the pump. The one at the
entrance to the pump can be inspected rather easily.
Chuck
|
58.692 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Are you married or happy? | Tue Jan 09 1990 13:38 | 26 |
| re .13
I have a valve on the tank similar to the ones on tires, but water is not
coming out of it.
re .14
I'll check these out as much as possible. I won't check anything below
ground level, till spring, if then. We'll probably just hook up to the
town water on the street sometime this year.
The well I would say is old. The concrete cover looks ancient, so I'd
bet that the well has been serving this 90 year old house for a real long
time. This being the case, what were some of the older techniques used
for older wells, from say, the 1920's or so? I can see a rubber or plastic
hose going down into the earth inside of the circular concrete casing,
covered by the concrete lid.
Bottom line, I don't want to spend any money fixing this well system,
I'd rather use it towards getting town water hooked up. But until then,
I'd like to get rid of the air in the system.
Thanks
Steve
|
58.466 | guess I've got the cheap version... | DINSCO::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Tue Jan 09 1990 22:55 | 7 |
| re: .13
There's nothing resembling a check valve close to the pump. That would
have made things too easy, and would have provided unnecessary redundancy
in the system, allowing it not to fail often enough 8^) 8^)
Ray
|
58.467 | Just add another check valve... | OPUS::CLEMENCE | | Mon Jan 15 1990 15:14 | 5 |
| Ray,
Why don't you add a check valve to the system and resolve your
problem. It don't hurt to have too many check valves in the pipes.
Bill
|
58.468 | keeping my eyes open while shopping | MAZE::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Mon Jan 15 1990 19:40 | 7 |
| re: .15 -< Just add another check valve... >-
I've been toying with just that idea ever since the mention of systems with
two. All I've got to do is find one that will go into the current set-up
easily. 8^)
Ray
|
58.469 | Don't add a check valve at pump | BRAT::DUTHIE | | Tue Jan 16 1990 14:07 | 30 |
| The check valve at the bottom of the well is called a foot valve.
On a jet pump there are two pipes that run into the well, the larger
pipe carries water up from the well, and the smaller one carries
water down into the well. Adding a check valve to the larger pipe
won't help because the smaller pipe will still allow water to go
down, and adding a check valve to the smaller pipe to stop water
from going down will cause the system to stop working completely.
The jet pump does not lift the water by suction, but uses a jet
at the bottom of the well to push water up. Both pipes have to
be full of water before the system can work. The pump sends part
of the water from the large pipe into the storage tank, and part
of it down the smaller pipe, to the jet, to lift more water. At
the bottom of the well, below the jet assembly, is the foot valve.
The foot valve is a check valve that keeps the water from draining
back into the well.
Now, just a guess, but since the entire system is pressurized (the
tank, pump, both pipes to well) then it would be very hard to have
air leak into the system. On the other hand, a water leak in any
of the pipes or a leaky foot valve would cause the system to slowly
lose pressure. When it gets down to a certain point the pump will
start and bring the pressure back up. If you can't see water leaking
in the house, then your problem sounds like one of the pipes to
the well or the foot valve. I would replace the foot valve first,
since it's much easier then digging up pipes.
good luck...
Jim D.
|
58.470 | dig we (better d@mn not) must... | MAZE::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Tue Jan 16 1990 22:42 | 12 |
| re: .17
Thanks for the explanation of the system, (and therefore why I shouldn't
add a check valve at the pump).
We had already come to the conclusion that the foot valve was probably
leaky, as I had completely eliminated the house piping by reproducing the
problem with the main shut-off closed.
Of course, if it's not the foot valve, I could always sell the house... 8^\
Ray
|
58.471 | How to reduce pump noise in house? | WYNTON::BMCWILLIAMS | Improvise if you have to ... | Fri Apr 13 1990 12:35 | 26 |
| I just moved into a 3-year-old house that has a well with a pump and tank in
the basement. I had the water system checked out by the building inspector
when I bought the house, and he said everything is working fine, but ...
What can I do to reduce the noise of the pump? I know it's never going to be
silent like being on city water, but I wonder if I can dampen the sound somehow
or adjust the pump settings/configuration to mimimize the sound of the pump
heard throughout the house.
o Can I, for instance, build a box around the pump and line it with some
sound-absorbing material? Any problems with this (heat build-up?)
o Should I get a larger tank?
o Should I set the pump cut out point higher?
Some specs:
Pump is a 3/4 hp Gould
Tank is Gould, not sure of capacity. Model V60. (About 3 feet high.)
Both are in corner of poured concrete basement. Floor drain nearby.
Pump is set to cut out/in at 50 and 35.
Just my wife and myself live in the house, but in the summer we plan to do a
fair amount of watering (lawn, gardens).
Thanks for any help.
|
58.472 | Honest, it gets quieter with time!! | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Go Bruins!! | Fri Apr 13 1990 13:35 | 18 |
| Yes, I am sure a box or closet around it would help reduce the noise,
and as long as it is not sealed, it shouldn't have any heat problems.
Just be sure to make the enclosure large enough so that none of the
insulation is in contact with the pump.
Your pump will need servicing, so make sure that you leave a way to get
at it.
We have lived in a house for 4+ years with a similar setup. It is in
a closet in the basement. I don't even hear it anymore (especially
over the noise of the oil/FHA furnace!).
I wouldn't spend too much time/energy/$$ on a solution though...
After awhile you will just tune out the noise.
Cheers,
jeff
|
58.473 | | HKFINN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Apr 13 1990 14:08 | 13 |
| I'd second .20; odds are extremely good that you'll get used to
it, and in fact almost enjoy it (no fooling). At least, that has
been my experience in houses with in-basement pumps. When you
hear it, and it sounds "normal", it's reassuring.
Of course, I may be relating it to childhood memories on my
grandfather's farm, and people without that connection may not
enjoy the sound so much, but give yourself a while to settle in
before you spend big bucks on silencing it.
Some sort of enclosure would certainly silence it - a simple plywood
box around it ought to do. As long as you give the pump and motor
a reasonable amount of clearance, I doubt that it would heat up
enough to bother in a relatively cool basement.
|
58.474 | It's a feature! | WEFXEM::COTE | A friendly stranger in a black sedan | Fri Apr 13 1990 14:26 | 12 |
| My pump is located directly under the master bedroom and I consider the
fact that I *can* hear it to be an advantage. When my tank lost its'
precharge I knew something was wrong right away because I could hear
the pump cycling differently.
...or when one of the seals let go in the middle of the night. The pump
came on, woke me up, and I knew something was amiss.
If it's *real* loud you may have a problem with it. It shouldn't sound
like much more than an electric motor, quietly whirring away.
Edd
|
58.475 | Insulation Styrofoam Board | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Put the wet stuff on the red stuff | Fri Apr 13 1990 14:59 | 13 |
| It Popular Science in the "Wordless Workshop" they showed a cartoon of
taking styrofoam board and gluing it into the shape of a 5 sided box (1
side missing) and using it as a means of insulating attic stairs
opening.
You could get some styrofoam insulation board, cut to size, glue the
edges together and make a cover for your pump. It would be light weight,
inexpensive and easy to make.
I agree that you will find the pump noise comforting after a while. If
you do make a cover, leave at least 4-6 inches air space around the
motor and put in some vents to let heat out and air circulate.
|
58.948 | | CRLAPB::black | Andrew P. Black | Fri Apr 27 1990 10:36 | 31 |
| My commiserations. This is the inverse of what happened when we took possesion
of our housr -- we had too much water (all over the living room floor).
But that is another story.
Talk to a well drilling outfit, preferably several. What they will
tell you is that there is no such thing as "deep enough" or "normal depth".
Usually, they drill until there is adequate flow, and then some more,
because the well pipe gives you some of your storage. They might hit a
vein of water at 150 feet, but not enough for your needs -- so they
drill down to 400 feet or 600 feet and pick up two more. In
massachusetts, I have never heard of not being able to get water if
youy drill deep enough -- it just costs big dollars.
Hydrofracting sometimes helps, sometimes doesn't. In your case it
clearly didn't -- sometimes it even reduces the flow, I believe.
Legally, you are on firm ground, since the previous owner clearly knew
about the problem, and if he had hydrofracting done you have
independant collaboration of that fact. The problem that I forsee is
that he will say "I'llpay to drill until you get 150 gallons per day"
and you say "I need 500 gallons per day".
There are accepted figures for usage though, which a drilling outfit
should be able to supply. Even if there are only two of you now, but
you have bought, say, a four bedroom house, you are entitled to require
a water supply (and septic system) that is adequate for five persons.
Your building codes may even require it.
Andrew
|
58.949 | flow rate and well depth = available water | SMURF::COHEN | | Fri Apr 27 1990 10:50 | 8 |
| You need to find out what your flow rate is first.
For a given flow rate you can determine what an adequate size well is
for your water usage. Even 1 gallon a minute will suffice if you have
a 1000' well. Mine is only 2.5 gallons a minute but at 500' depth I have
never run out of water.
-Larry
|
58.950 | Drill deeper? | SA1794::DOWSEYK | Kirk Dowsey 243-2440 | Tue May 01 1990 17:40 | 11 |
| Well drillers in western Mass say that deepening a well can
not be done after the well driling rig has been removed. In that
case you would have to have a whole new well. I live in western
Mass, and now I need a well drilled. I have talked to four drillers
about returning and redrilling if I run out of money before they
hit water. They all say that there is no way!
What does your lawyer say about going to court and forcing the
seller to drill you a good well.
Kirk
|
58.951 | Digging deeper can be done... | OPUS::CLEMENCE | | Wed May 02 1990 23:53 | 10 |
| RE: .4
> Well drillers in western Mass say that deepening a well can
> not be done after the well driling rig has been removed.
My neighbor who worked for a well drilling company has in the past
had his well dug deeper.... I guess they do it different from central to
western Mass.
Bill
|
58.952 | look before you buy | JUPITR::BUSWELL | We're all temporary | Thu May 03 1990 11:19 | 2 |
| what ever happen to buyer beware?
|
58.953 | Disclosure | SMURF::KEGEL | Clone me, Dr. Memory! | Thu May 03 1990 19:00 | 24 |
| >> what ever happen to buyer beware?
What ever happened to good will? Or treat one's neighbor as onesself?
Caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) died when the lawyers noticed
an unserved market ;-} Too many people bought a pig in a poke,
failed to look a gift horse in the mouth, bought fool's gold, and
forgot to look before they leapt, so laws were passed.
The modern concept is "full disclosure." If I tell you about a
problem, you have been disclosed and can make your own decisions about
treating it. We just sold a house with a radon reading of 6 (the
US Government standard says 4.0 or below is safe). By disclosing
this to the buyers (with their formal response in writing), we
dismissed our responsibility in the matter, and the buyers accepted
the responsibility. They can mitigate if they wish.
On the other hand, one must still be careful to ask pointed questions
of realtors. A "not to my knowledge" response is not an answer,
but it seems to meet the letter of the law. I suppose that if you
(the realtor) don't know the answer, you have fully disclosed by
that response.
-andy kegel@krisis (aka smurf::kegel)
|
58.202 | recommendation for water test lab? | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Tue May 08 1990 12:36 | 5 |
| Can anyone recommend a reliable independent test lab in the Greater
Maynard area which will test for minerals and bacteria and help me
understand the results? I'm told that Sears doesn't test for bacteria,
and, besides, they're not independent -- they sell water treatment
products. Thanks very much.
|
58.203 | WaterTest | PKENT::KENT | Peter Kent - SASE, 223-1933 | Tue May 08 1990 13:30 | 7 |
| Try WaterTest. 800-426-8378. They're in N.H. and do a large variety
of tests at a wide variety of prices. Everything's handled via one of
the express services, so you don't have to take the sample there. They
include a freezer pack with styrofoam for the perishable samples, such
as coliform bacteria.
Peter
|
58.204 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue May 08 1990 14:04 | 6 |
| I've used Rietzel (sp?) Labs in Boylston. You do have to take the
samples there (you also have to go there to pick up clean/sterile
bottles to put the samples in). From Bolton it's not too bad but
it might be a bit of a drive from Maynard. If you can do it via
express service with WaterTest, it would probably be more convenient,
but Rietzel is good.
|
58.205 | bottles at board of health | LANDO::AHARRIS | | Tue May 08 1990 14:17 | 1 |
| Your town's Board of Health office might have bottles. Stow's does.
|
58.206 | Most pharmacies sell sterile specimen bottles... | NITMOI::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Tue May 08 1990 14:25 | 0 |
58.207 | wrong end ... | VIA::GLANTZ | Mike, DTN 381-1253 | Tue May 08 1990 17:09 | 3 |
| Yeah, but that isn't exactly what I want tested ... :-)
Many thanks to all who replied (here and by mail).
|
58.954 | Ask the seller | ARCHER::LAWRENCE | | Thu May 10 1990 17:25 | 12 |
| > On the other hand, one must still be careful to ask pointed questions
> of realtors. A "not to my knowledge" response is not an answer,
Might be a better idea to insist on asking the seller directly. When I was
in real estate (many moons ago) I was instructed NEVER to ask any questions.
In fact we were encouraged to stop the seller if it looked as though he/she
were about to make disclosures.
Luckily I never sold a house, so can live with a clean conscience. Also
luckily, I got out of the field (to which I was clearly unsuited).
Betty
|
58.955 | Sandbagging the seller | CLOSET::DUM::T_PARMENTER | Path lost to partner IE.NFW -69 | Tue May 15 1990 11:12 | 14 |
| As I understand the law in Mass., real estate agents are not obliged to
seek out any detrimental information about a house being offered for sale,
but if an agent already knows detrimental information she is required to
disclose it to all potential purchasers.
When we submitted a bid for our house, we attached the housing inspector's
report, thus forcing the agent to disclose lots of detrimental information
about the house. The result was that several prospective purchasers dropped
out entirely, the last remaining bidder dropped way way down in price, and
we got the house.
The bottom line on the base noter's problem, however, is what was in the
purchase and sales agreement, right?
|
58.221 | Acid well | AKOV13::MATUS | Networks Prod Mktg Mgr for GIA | Wed May 16 1990 10:58 | 26 |
| My water was recently analyzed as being mildly acidic --- 6.0 to 6.5.
I have a couple of questions:
1. I know that you can put in a treatment system as the water enters
the house to neutralize the Ph, but, what does the acid content
do to the well??? Will it eat through the casing or the pump?
2. As for drinking this stuff, one of the water specialists I
contacted mentioned that I should install a chemical feeder
at the point where the water enters my house. The feeder turns
on when the pump turns on. It injects potassium hydroxide
(POT ASH, I think) as a neutralizer.
a. How dangerous is concentrated potassium hydroxide to keep
around my house?
b. How bad is it (over my lifetime) to be drinking this stuff
when diluted? Or is there some chemical reaction that leaves
a by-product?
c. How does this process differ from a neutralizing filter?
Thanks in advance!
Roger
|
58.222 | Eats pipes slowly | VIA::SUNG | The Duke: It costs mass millions | Wed May 16 1990 11:30 | 11 |
| My town water is also in acid range about pH 6-6.5. The acidic water
does react with metallic pipes slowly. On copper supply lines, it
leaches out copper into the water. You will see blue stains in the
toilet or where water drips. The water will also have a funny metallic
taste when it stands in the pipes overnight.
I think that adding some alkaline material to acidic water doesn't
produce any harmful side effects. Any chemistry experts out there?
I think Pot Ash is very stable, kind of like limestone.
-al
|
58.223 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Wed May 16 1990 12:31 | 8 |
| Concentrated potassium hydroxide is nasty stuff. Treat it the same as you
would treat lye, it's quite similar to it. Keep it dry and sealed, it'll suck
moisture right out of the air. Be careful mixing it with water, it'll get hot
as it dissolves.
Once properly neutralized by acid, the stuff is harmless.
-Mike
|
58.224 | From a chemist | VIA::SUNG | The Duke: It costs mass millions | Wed May 16 1990 14:41 | 12 |
| This is from a chemist at Digital:
I talked to my manager, (PhD chemist type) and quite up on this stuff.
He said that 6-6.5 pH ain't that unusual for a water supply. He seemed
to remember CocaCola as being 2-3 on the scale. He said that it was
*not* a good idea to be neutralizing your water. Then he mumbled some-
thing about "...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing..."
Basically, your water is a bit acidic, yes, but not worth worrying about.
The chemicals you add may be more harmful than the low pH.
That's our diagnosis here in Northboro.
|
58.225 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Wed May 16 1990 16:00 | 7 |
| Our water neutralizer just bubbles the water up through fine grain
limestone. It works great. The blue tinge on my shower is slowly
fading away. The neighbor had one installed too. His kid's hair is
returning to blond. Both the independent water testing lab and the
neutralizer salesman (of course) said our water was way too acid,
though I don't recall a Ph figure.
- Vick
|
58.226 | Cost? DIY? | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Poor Planning Perpetuates Pudgy People | Wed May 16 1990 16:32 | 6 |
| re<<< Note 1674.7 by R2ME2::BENNISON "Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56" >>>
What was the cost of having this acidic water neutralizer installed? Can you
DIY?
|
58.227 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Wed May 16 1990 23:44 | 6 |
| It cost about $600 for the neutralizer plus a water filter (lots of
muck in our water) plus a line and outdoor tap I asked the installer
to put in for me. I wouldn't have wanted to do it myself, but I'm real
unhandy with plumbing. The installer was excellent.
- Vick
|
58.228 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu May 17 1990 09:56 | 17 |
| > <<< Note 1674.4 by VIA::SUNG "The Duke: It costs mass millions" >>>
> I think that adding some alkaline material to acidic water doesn't
> produce any harmful side effects. Any chemistry experts out there?
An acid plus an alkali gives you a salt plus water.
For example, HCl (hydrochloric acid) plus NaOH (sodium hydroxide, lye)
yields HOH (water) plus NaCl (sodium chloride, table salt).
This is just an example, your acid and salt may vary.
It's probably more important to you as to which acid you've got.
Sulphuric acid will probably make your water smell and drive you to
neutralize it. Others might not have any obvious effect.
Also, pH is only one of the measures of acidity.
Total acid content and effect on you and your plumbing need more complete
tests and evaluation.
- tom]
|
58.229 | | CLOSUS::HOE | How terrible can TWOs be? | Thu May 17 1990 11:42 | 13 |
| Folks,
We have friends who has a well that has acidic water; it was too
late to soon to add the neutralizer system for them. They
discovered little leaks all over the house from the leaky copper
lines. Cost a bundle to replace the water lines with the grey
plastic lines.
Another condition needs to be thought of; if you have high blood
pressure, you might ask your doctor about water systems that add
salt to your water system.
cal
|
58.230 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Thu May 17 1990 12:38 | 13 |
| re .11:
>Another condition needs to be thought of; if you have high blood
>pressure, you might ask your doctor about water systems that add
>salt to your water system.
Looks like someone already thought of this in the case of the system mentioned
in .3. It uses potassium hydroxide and not sodium hydroxide which is easier
to obtain and probably cheaper.
Sodium is the nasty in table salt regarding high blood pressure.
-Mike
|
58.512 | Old Well - New water? | ICS::SUTER | | Thu Jun 21 1990 15:22 | 28 |
|
I've read all the info I could find in this file in relation
to wells. Good stuff, but I still have a few questions.
I currently have a well at my summer camp which cannot
keep up with any "heavy" demands. It can handle weekend use
when caution is exercised, but a solid week of vacation will
drink it dry. I must improve the water supply one way or another
and am interested in the inexpensive (read:cheap) solutions, before
I call in the drillers.
What is the feasibility of digging an existing 16-20' well another
12 feet deeper? (the magic number is 32' right?) Would popular
opinion be that flow would increase as well as stored volume?
The existing well is lined with ?concrete? cylinders which
have been there for 60+ years and probably won't move. How about
inserting the new walls inside the existing ones then digging?
Are there rental digging devices available? Something that looks
like a posthole digger connected to a pulley/winch system?
Feel free to tell me I'm crazy for entertaining such a thought....
Any advice is appreciated...
Rick
|
58.513 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Jun 21 1990 16:41 | 20 |
| Actually, the practical limit for a shallow-well pump is about
25', so I've been told. 32' is quite theoretical. You can't
get that perfect a vacuum. You could of course go to a
submersible or jet pump to go deeper, but that's $$$.
What is the diameter of the existing hole? From your description,
it sounds like it's something you can climb down inside of...yes?
If so, I guess you could get down in there and dig some more,
and see if that improved the situation any. The liner may go
deeper than what you can see (after 60 years, it may have filled
up some), and you could re-dig to the bottom of the existing liner.
I guess you could put a new (smaller) liner inside the existing
one and dig down inside that, but you might not be able to get
down inside then (assuming you can now). Machinery...maybe one
of those clamshell arrangements like they clean storm drains with?
The simplest thing is probably to get somebody to come and drill
a deep well. Shallow wells tend to be (in theory) subject to
contamination, anyway.
|
58.128 | fill in a well | WMOIS::L_WATERMAN | | Mon Jul 09 1990 09:58 | 11 |
|
This doesn't exactly fit here, but sort of.
We live in a circa 1750 house. There is a well on the back porch,
but is too close to the septic to be usable.
My question is how do we fill in the old well? It overflows
thru the cellar. And I want the wet out. Do we have to drain the
well first? And then what do we fill it with? Rocks and sand?
Any suggestions??? Linda
|
58.129 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jul 09 1990 10:56 | 9 |
| You can't really "drain" a well unless you can put in a pipe
down at the level you want the water to be at and run it downhill
someplace from there. I can't imagine a way you could do this.
The level of water in a well is the level of the water table in
the ground, so that's what you are stuck with. I guess if you
live on a hill the topography might be such that you could manage
this, but it would probably take a lot of deep trenching.
As far as filling it in, I'd use sand.
|
58.130 | are you sure? | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Mon Jul 09 1990 12:12 | 8 |
| huh? Did you mean a well or a cistern? A well has water flowing into it
from below and a cistern collects and stores rainwater, usually from the roof.
If you have a well, then -.1 is correct, you're going to have a hard time
keeping water out of it. If you have a cistern, then you may also have some
drainage pipes going into it. Can you use the water for lawn and landscaping
needs?
-Bob
|
58.131 | its a well | WMOIS::L_WATERMAN | | Tue Jul 10 1990 08:52 | 9 |
|
Its a well. I imagine when the house was first built, the well was put
on the porch for convenience. As the well is on the back porch, there
is not way to run a pipe to drain it. I guess I will try the sand, it
may not take care of all the water but getting rid of some is better
than none.
Thanks, Linda
|
58.132 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jul 10 1990 09:42 | 2 |
| Filling in the well won't get rid of *any* of the water. The level
of the water in the well is the level of the water in the ground.
|
58.133 | Next question: What to do about this willow tree? ;-) | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Tue Jul 10 1990 14:42 | 3 |
| Plant a willow tree nearby.
Dick
|
58.134 | would this work? | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Tue Jul 10 1990 16:29 | 13 |
| I've been following this string for awhile and wonder why someone
hasn't suggested this: (maybe because it won't work???)
since filling the well hole with sand won't stop the water (porous
sand), why not try to fill it withi something that's not nearly so
porous.
what if you mixed a bag of cement with a bag of sand and dumped the dry
mixture down the hole. It'd wet up, then cure and plug the hole. I'm
not sure what ratio of sand to cement I'd try...maybe someone can
suggest?
tony
|
58.135 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jul 10 1990 17:02 | 14 |
| re: .17
That would certainly remove the water from the well, but the problem
(as I understand the question) isn't the water in the well, it's
the water in the cellar, which is coming from the surrounding ground.
You could fill the well with concrete, but then you'd just have the
equivalent of a large rock a short distance from the cellar wall,
and still have the water in the ground all around it.
Now, your concrete trick *might* work to some extent if it was a
drilled well and water was coming up into the well from deeper down
in the ground through a non-porous layer; then you would slow down
at least the rate of water flow. But with a 1750-vintage dug well,
I dont' think that applies.
|
58.136 | Another solution??? | SWAM2::JACOMB_SC | I know enough to be dangerous!! | Tue Jul 10 1990 18:19 | 7 |
| If you don't feel that the water is fit for human consumption, How
about using the water from the well for your landscaping?. This may
keep the groundwater level down and therefore out of the cellar, as
well as providing a source of water for your plants. Am I off base here
or is this a possible solution?
-Scott
|
58.137 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jul 11 1990 10:54 | 5 |
| re: .19
Might work, if you could pump enough often enough, and the refill rate
of the well was slow enough. I suspect though, you'd have to pump
pretty much all the time for it to make a significant difference.
Put a sump pump in the bottom of the well!
|
58.138 | NOT A PROBLEM, THIS MAYBE A BENEFIT | FDCV07::HARBOLD | | Wed Jul 11 1990 13:09 | 21 |
| First, the water level in the well is a direct reflection of the water
table. The only way that water from the well will affect the basement
water problem is if the ground flow is toward the house. The solution
for that is to use a sump pump type of deal to keep the water lower
than the back flow. Another way to correct this is to seal the water
flow or the basement wall. Even if the well is filled with sand or
cement, when the water table rises to that level, the flow to the
basement will occur, that is the point.
Before you simply close up this well have the water checked for safety.
It is entirely possible that the underground flow pattern from the
nearby septic system (drain field) is such that the well is fine. That
regulation is to protect for all/most situations. Given the poor
quality of Massachuesetts water supplies, the well might be a big asset
if it is pure.
Given the cost of water, even if the water is unfit for consumption, it
can be used to water lawns and gardens. Since hand dug wells are
shallow, pumps for the well are not too expensive.
|
58.139 | i don't need another well | WMOIS::L_WATERMAN | | Thu Jul 12 1990 14:39 | 14 |
|
It's me again, the one with the well. The well is about 6 feet
away from the cellar wall on the porch. What I want to do is keep
some of the water out of the cellar. If I fill it in, won't I
displace the water??? I know at first it will probably go through
the cellar to be pumped out, but after some time won't the water
stop flowing.
I don't need this well for water my gardens. I already have
two other wells. An artesian that we put in about 8 years ago, and
the other hand dug well that we used previously.
Thank you for all of your suggestions.
Linda
|
58.140 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | How do you get this car out of second gear? | Thu Jul 12 1990 15:15 | 16 |
| re .22:
> some of the water out of the cellar. If I fill it in, won't I
> displace the water??? I know at first it will probably go through
> the cellar to be pumped out, but after some time won't the water
> stop flowing.
Nope. The water level in the well is only an indication of the water level
in the soil. Fill in the well and the water level in the soil doesn't change,
and your basement will still be wet.
Probably the best solution is the sump pump in the well. This will actually
make an attempt to LOWER the water level in the ground because the water in the
soil will run into the dry well instead of the basement.
-Mike
|
58.141 | | FSTVAX::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Thu Jul 12 1990 17:25 | 12 |
| a riddle:
If Linda WATERman has too much water in her cellar,
^^^^^ ^^^^^
What will Tony BEAN have in his?
^^^^
sorry, folks... just a silly moment. forgive me! ;^)
tony
|
58.514 | The conclusion of the dug well! | KAHALA::SUTER | | Wed Oct 17 1990 17:06 | 19 |
|
re: Last 2
Here's what I ended up doing....
The dug well mentioned in .-1 and .-2 was already dug
down to the bottom of the lining. All the advice I got
pointed to the wise decision being to call the drillers.
I did and 2500 bucks later I had 32 GPM at 84 feet. Ledge
was around 50 feet. As drilled wells go I understand the price
was pretty fair...? The drillers appeared to know their business
but the guy that showed up to hookup the pump was a different
story.
Now, I've had to train myself that I *can* run the water in
the house..... :-)
Rick
|
58.515 | Wellmate tank? | KAHALA::SUTER | | Wed Oct 17 1990 17:20 | 21 |
|
Oh yeah... I had another question also....
Does anyone have a Wellmate fiberglass tank? Or not have one
and happen to know the winterization process for them? It's
fiberglass with an inflatable bladder located at the top of
the tank.
I drained the tank, but wasn't sure about the bladder.
Should I deflate it for the non-use period of the winter?
The 2 page paperwork that came with it stated in several
places not to let it freeze. This non-freeze requirement,
I assume is when water is in the tank, true? Would the tank
itself or some other component be damaged by freezing, when
empty?
Thanks,
Rick
|
58.516 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Oct 18 1990 10:37 | 2 |
| re: .17
My guess is, all you'd need to do is drain the water.
|
58.517 | leave the air in | PFSVAX::PETH | Critter kids | Tue Oct 23 1990 11:42 | 4 |
| We have a Wellmate plastic tank, the bladder should always have a
charge on it. Draining the water should be sufficent, any small amount
left in it will only compress the bladder a little bit if it freezes.
|
58.518 | | FSTTOO::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Mon Oct 29 1990 23:39 | 27 |
| WE (my wife and I ) just built a cabin in VT. We are (hopefully)
having the well dug this coming weekend (weather permitting). I've
checked out drilled wells and most of those in the area are several
hundred feet and costs estimate around the $5000 mark.
my questions:
The guys doing the digging are the same ones I've been using for all
the rest of our excavation (driveway, stumps, house, trenches, etc.)
and are great. They both dowse, and from waht I hear, are pretty good
(85 to 95 percent hit rate) and we'll dig test holes before the well
is dug.. do any of you put much stock in dowsing?
also, I am planning on having the pump inside the cellar, in an
insulated room (built for the purpose) which will also contain the
propane hot water heater. This arrangement will prevent freezing.
Pipes which go outside this room will be drained into a dry well. The
pipe bringing water INTO this room, and to the holding tank from the
well, will be wrapped in good electrical heating tape.
am I overlooking anything?
also, the pipe from well to house will be below frost level and will
have 2 inches of solid foam insulation over it as well as 48 in.
sand/dirt.
tony
|
58.519 | deep well pump? | ASIC::ARRIGHI | Open the pod bay door, HAL. | Fri Nov 09 1990 17:16 | 9 |
| re .20
I thought that cellar pumps were only for shallow wells and that
"several hunderd feet" called for a submersible pump.
As for their hit rate, that has more to do with your location than
their skills.
Tony
|
58.520 | | HKFINN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Nov 12 1990 10:18 | 7 |
| re: .21
No, you can put a deep well pump in the cellar too. It's not the
same setup as a shallow well pump though; there are two lines going
to the well, so it pumps a portion of the water back down the well
to create the lift. (Not too sure of the operational details, I'm
afraid, but it does work.)
|
58.521 | Jet Pump | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Shhh... Mad Scientist at work... | Mon Nov 12 1990 10:30 | 9 |
| re .22:
That's a jet pump. It pumps water down into the well to a jet which basically
shoots upward, bringing more water up with it than was sent down. I don't know
what the height limitations of these are. Normal pumps are limited to 33
vertical feet of suction (in theory; much less in actual practice) which is why
most deep-well pumps are down in the well.
-Mike
|
58.693 | waterlogged holding tank? | MR4DEC::PMCEACHERN | Illigitimi non carborundum | Thu Mar 28 1991 08:58 | 19 |
| Seems like its time to revive this topic...
Recently our pump has begun to cycle on and off at an annoying rate when small
amounts of water are being drawn. The pressure gauge goes rapidly from ~30
to ~50 pounds and back again. From reading this and related topics, I am
fairly certain that the holding tank is full of water. Our tank is quite large,
I would estimate ~50 gallons, and is a plain galvanized job with inlet and
outlet at opposite sides at the bottom, and a ~1.5" threaded hole at the top
with a solid plug in it. I suspect it does not have any sort of bladder in it.
How does one go about replacing air in a "non-captive" tank? Will I need to
remove the solid plug and replace it with an air valve? If I remove the plug,
and drain the tank, will it just refill to the top with H2O? Does
pre-pressurizing the tank allow for a larger air cushion than just letting it
fill with water to the point where the air in the top of the tank has
compressed to ~50 lbs?
Regards,
Paul
|
58.694 | HERE IS HOW | SONATA::HARBOLD | | Thu Mar 28 1991 13:27 | 36 |
| Your assessment seem right on target. Over time the air gets absorbed
by the water going through the tank. A bladder only slows this down.
At this point the tank is probably filled with water and you need to
drain it out and then if possible build up an air charge to within
a couple of pounds of the pump turn on pressure.
You stated that you had an input pipe and a different output pipe.
Some installations use a "T" tank connector so that the water can
flow from the input side to the outside without passing through the
tank.
The first step is to shut off the pump. There should be a valve on
both the input side and output pipes. There should also be a spigot
between one of the tank pipes and those valves so that you can drain
the tank. Shut off the valves and get ready to empty the tank. If
you have a drain, run a hose to the drain, otherwise you will need
some buckets. On my installations I also always had an air intake
stem. If you have one, you need a tank of air to fill the tank and
push out the water. The process is to empty the tank, until there is a
vacuum and the water stops. Shut off the spigot and put some air in.
Do this until you start to get air from the spigot. Shut off the
spigot. Fill the tank up to working pressure, open the pump/input
valve and turn on the pump. When it stops, drain a little from the
spigot to get rid of possible air, shut off the spigot and turn on
the output value and run some water through to get rid of any air in
the system.
If you do not have an air stem, you have to take off the insert at the
top and let gravity empty the tank. Recharging may not be possible,
but if you can get the tank pressurized it is better. If not you just
close it up and the water will rise in the tank until the right
pressure is reached.
This is a lot easier to do than the explanation is to read. Just think
that you want to drain the tank and not the house lines and the process
is relatively straight forward. If I can do this, it is not that hard.
|
58.342 | Pitcher pumps (hand water pumps) | REGENT::BENDEL | | Thu Apr 18 1991 16:54 | 27 |
| I'd like to know about people's experiences with hand pumps
(pitcher pumps) and shallow well setups. Here's the situation:
I'm planning on getting a shallow well (dug by backhoe) for my
summer camp in Maine. It is on a lake, and I've used lake water
directly for most things except for drinking. drinking water comes
from a couple gallons of spring water that we bring in. It would
be much more convenient to have a hand pump outside my door than to
have to fetch water from the lake, and I also would expect better
water in a shallow well since it would be filtered through the
ground/sand.
I've found a guy to dig and install well tiles cheap enough.
My question now is, are all pitcher pumps created equal ? If not,
what are some good ones, how do I identify them, where do I get them ?
I've used some at campgrounds before that tend to even run for several
seconds after you get them going, do they all do this, or only the
better ones ? How have people mounted these pumps ?
Any feedback on the shallow well/handpump setup is welcome. The
well is expected to be only 8 feet deep. Other's in the area are, and
they have ample water.
Steve
moderator: I couldn't find any notes that discussed pitcher pumps.
Move this if needed, and I was wrong ! Also, you might add the
appropriate keyword for this. thanks
|
58.343 | two basic types | SALEM::LAYTON | | Fri Apr 19 1991 13:48 | 19 |
| Having been the son of a campground owner, I recall that there are
basically 2 types of pumps - single and double acting. Single acting
are the familiar "pitcher" pumps. Once the piston gasket wears a
little, and the foot valve (foot valve is needed on the bottom of the
pipe for either type) gets a piece of sand in it, you'll need to prime
the pump more and more frequently. Pitcher pumps deliver water only on
the downstroke of the pump handle.
The double piston pump typically has a faucet on the end, which, when
closed, helps to keep the pump primed for long periods of time. These
pumps deliver on both the up and down strokes.
The biggest difference, tho, is the price. The double will cost 2 to 5
times as much as a pitcher pump, but is worth it, IMO.
P.S. This is from thirty years ago, so my terminology may not be
correct.
Carl
|
58.344 | Found three suppliers, now to compare ! | REGENT::BENDEL | | Fri Apr 19 1991 14:06 | 14 |
| I've been looking around, and have found three places that carry these
pumps (all single action, I believe). Somerville lumber $49.99,
Sears $42.99, Lowell plumbing $65.00. I'm going to check them out this
weekend and compare quality (if that's even obvious !).
Do you have any pointers to a supplier of the dual-action ? These
pumps I have found all have fairly short handles, I seem to remember
using bigger ones at campgrounds, maybe they were the duals.
Also, I'm planning on setting my well tiles on a bed of stone,
so maybe I'll be lucky and my foot valve will stay clear. That would be
nice !
thanks for the info
Steve
|
58.345 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Apr 22 1991 14:31 | 3 |
| What are "well tiles"?
Marc H.
|
58.346 | Replaced Handles at Camps | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Put the Environment First | Tue Apr 23 1991 16:23 | 5 |
| I have heard that the pump handles are often cast metal which is
generally more brittle than other forms of metal. Handles are often
replaced with lengths of pipe welded to the pump to fix those broken
off by over vealous pumpers. When the handle is replaced, it may be
replaced by a longer handle to improve teh leverage.
|
58.347 | well tiles are .... | REGENT::BENDEL | | Wed Apr 24 1991 10:57 | 7 |
| What I'm calling well tiles, and what the local supplier up there
calls well tiles, are pre-cast concrete cylinders, about 3 feet
in diameter, and either 2 or 4 feet tall. They are merely set into
an excavated hole and the water fills (to some point) the well from
the bottom opening. (I haven't seen one, they could be slightly
different). Also, these could have a different name here in Mass.,
but I don't think so.
|
58.348 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Apr 25 1991 09:21 | 7 |
|
Thanks...sounds like well tiles are really well liners.
I have an old shallow dug well (160 years old)....I just might put
in a Pitcher Pump also.
Marc H.
|
58.349 | Bought one | REGENT::BENDEL | | Thu Apr 25 1991 10:57 | 9 |
| I bought a pump. Sears didn't carry the one they sell, it's a catalog
order only. I went to Lowell Plumbing, and compared theirs to what I
had seen at Somerville Lumber, and I'm sure it was the exact same
pump, manufacturer and all. Lowells price was higher, but he sold it
to me for the lower price.
I tried it at home in a tub of water, and I think it's gonna do
just fine ! I should get the well dug in May, and the pump installed.
I'll keep this note posted in case anyone can learn anything from what
I go through.
|
58.315 | radon filter help | USMFG::BVALIANT | Bob Valiant 297-5532 | Tue May 07 1991 00:28 | 35 |
|
Well, I've read everything in here regarding Radon, every brochure
I could find, and still have questions: (also entered in Real_Estate
note)
I'm negotiating on a house that had a carbon water filter for Radon
installed back in '86. Then, it was the thing to do. Now, they
are just about classified as hazardous waste, since all the Radon
has collected there for 5 years.
question 1:
How do I dispose of it? I'm trying to find the right person in
the EPA for info. Will it be expensive to dispose of? I may need
to put a disposal clause into the P&S if it looks tough to do.
I checked the water and air radon levels: air 2.8 basement, living
area 2.3; water 9800. All those levels are OK. But - the EPA,
I hear, is thinking of lowering the recommended water level to as
low as 300!
(water level was tested *without* the filter on-line)
question 2: has anyone heard about the proposed EPA levels?
question 3: I understand radon emits Gamma radiation. will that
show up on a geiger counter???
I really like the house I'm speaking of, or else I'd probably drop
all this for the hassle I'm going thru to research it!
Thanks.
Bob...
!if the filter is"hot" enough, meybe I could open up
my own local nuclear power plant???
|
58.316 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Shhh... Mad Scientist at work... | Tue May 07 1991 00:57 | 15 |
| re .19:
> question 3: I understand radon emits Gamma radiation. will that
> show up on a geiger counter???
Radon and its daughters emit alpha, beta and gamma so they will show up if you
are checking residue. Radon itself emits alpha and probably gamma. I don't
know which of the 3 (alpha, beta, gamma) the Geiger counter is sensitive to.
> !if the filter is"hot" enough, meybe I could open up
> my own local nuclear power plant???
How about digging a uranium mine where your well is?
-Mike
|
58.350 | we used one... | OASS::BURDEN_D | He's no fun, he fell right over | Wed May 08 1991 17:26 | 9 |
| Had a dug well about 20' or so deep at our 'camp' in Vermont. A friend and I
got the job of removing years of mud that accumulated at the bottom one summer.
Got kind of cold down there. The well must have been 5' in diameter with the
round tiles.
It had the type of pump we had to prime so we always kept a quart bottle on the
top of the well for that and always refilled it when we were done pumping.
Dave
|
58.576 | picking old nits | ALIEN::MCCULLEY | RSX Pro | Tue May 14 1991 17:09 | 15 |
| I just stumbled onto this note and had to quibble with the math for the
sake of any future readers...
.6> The static water level is 15' from the top of the well
.6> which gives me at least 600' to 650' of water.
.6> All that adds up to 900 gals + 360gals/4hours or 1260 gallons
.6> of water available every 4 hours.
seems to me that this really adds up to 1260 gals in the first four
hours, and 360 gals in each successive four hours (until the excess of
supply over demand can replenish the initial 900 gals or so of storage).
in other words, volume capacity is storage plus inflow, but once
storage is used it's not available until replenished.
|
58.522 | Deep wells == hard water | HPSTEK::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Tue May 21 1991 10:19 | 8 |
| re: .9 deeper wells producing harder water.
With all the well people we've been talking to lately, it seems that
the deeper the well, the higher the mineral content. This would
explain your finding, too.
Elaine
|
58.32 | Old-fashioned quality is unavailable | HPSTEK::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Tue May 21 1991 11:27 | 20 |
| Time to update a silent note.
My husband and I are in the process of trying to get a well drilled on
a lot we would like to buy so we can close. Our bank is requiring this
as a condition of the consturction loan.
My comment is this: based on discussions in HOME_WORK, with well users
and installers, we would really like to use a cable drilled well.
There are several (about a dozen) cable people in central New England,
but about half are out of business. Another quarter are out of
state and either won't travel far or are not licensed out of state.
I'm afraid that this is becoming a dying art. If anyone has recently
had a cable drilled well done, please contact me. Since we are under a
time constraint, I'm afraid we'll end up with a rotary driller.
I'm dying to find out the outcome: we learned to dowse this weekend,
but need some confirmation of what we believe is down under the ground!
Elaine
|
58.523 | | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Tue May 21 1991 13:59 | 6 |
|
Well, Deep wells=BIG_MONEY. My well is 700 feet. The water is not hard
and I did have the water tested.
Wayne
|
58.33 | Good luck! | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Tue May 21 1991 14:06 | 6 |
|
Are you refering to a "Pounder"? I looked around several years ago but
it proved to be impossible to find one. It takes soo much longer to
"pound" the hole then using a rotary drill. I found that the ones that
would service the area that I am in were all booked up for the season.
|
58.351 | Sandpoints | SOLVIT::TOMMYB::BERKNER | Wonderful person. | Tue May 21 1991 15:35 | 17 |
| At my folks cabin in Wis. we had picher pump that we used for over 30
years. We had to replace the leathers (fairly simple job) every 7 or 8
years but no other problems.
Instead of digging a well, we drove a sand point about 20 feet down.
Before you ask, a sand point is basically a pointed piece of pipe
(maybe 1 1/2" dia x 30" long) with holes drilled all around it. The
inside is lined with a fine mesh brass screen to keep sand out. You
screw a 5' section of pipe onto the point and drive it in. As driving
progresses, you keep adding more pipe sections. The driving tool
consisted of a piece of 2" pipe about 3 feet long, capped at one end
and long 'D' shaped handles on each side. You pick it up. and let it
fall down onto the pipe, driving it into the ground. (the driven pipe
always has a cap on the top end to protect the threads.) This worked
great in a place where the nearest rock was 10 miles away - don't know
how good it would be in New England.
|
58.335 | | JUPITR::MENARD | | Mon Jun 03 1991 09:31 | 12 |
| I had the same thing happen Friday p.m. It tripped most of the
breakers in my house, blew my vcr and messed up my well water. I
called the well company sat. a.m. and he told me to just let the water
run for hours til it cleared. I let it run yesterday for over 6 hours
and finally ended up with crystal clear water (after having gone from
orange, to then cloudy with rock "dust" then the sulphur smell).
This a.m. the water is back to orange. The water pressure also isn't
what it was before. How do I tell if I've got a leak or crack in the
pipe?
Kathy
|
58.577 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Tue Jun 04 1991 11:11 | 5 |
|
Just one question: How does anyone determine the flow rate of a well?
Is is just as simple as turning on the tap for 4 hours to see how much
comes out, or is there another way.
|
58.87 | Advice needed | HPSTEK::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Tue Jun 04 1991 11:24 | 31 |
| I need some guidance.
My husband and I had a well drilled 10 days ago on a lot we hope to
build on. The bank requires the well test for closing, and the town
requires the water be potable for a building permit.
After the well was drilled, the pump company installed the well pump,
and began pumping water for a water test sample. Shortly after they
started pumping, they added a quart of bleach to the well. I probably
should have stopped them, but I didn't know why. They then pumped for
at least 3 hours (I don't know exactly how long), and left the sample
for us to pick up.
We got the results yesterday, and the Chlorine level is too high. Also
too high are Iron and Manganese. The test report says the water is
undrinkable. Of course, the coliform bacteria level was zero.
We're not sure what to do. If we submit these results, will the bank
reject the water? Will the building inspector reject the water?
Should we pump the well for a long time, like all day, and then retest?
Or is retesting necessary?
We could ask the people involved, but we're not sure if pointing the
problem out is a good idea.
Also, was it bad for the well pump people to add bleach to the new
well?
Thanks. I'm afraid I'm not thinking straight.
Elaine
|
58.578 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jun 04 1991 12:20 | 21 |
| re: .8
No, you can't determine it just by turning on the water. Suppose
your well is a real winner and flows 25 gallons/minute. There's
no way you'll get 25 gallons/minute out of your faucets, even
with them all open. I don't know how you'd do it.
I can tell you how the well drillers did it when I got my well drilled;
while the drilling rig was still in the hole, they used the rig
(somehow) to pump water out of the hole. As it flowed out of the
hole, they took a shovel, made a sluiceway out of dirt, and
stuck a pipe into it so the water had to flow through the pipe.
Then they caught the water in a bucket and timed how long it took
to fill the bucket. After some interval of this they said the
well was flowing at 6 gallons/minute.
All this leads me to believe that the flow rate of a well tends
to be a rather imprecise number....
What you could do is open all the faucets and see if you can pump
the well dry over a period of time, i.e. if you can pump it out
faster than it can replenish itself. This slightly risky, however,
because I think you can burn out a submerged well pump in short order
if it runs without being in water.
|
58.88 | Doesn't sound too bad - Keep flushing | CHART::CBUSKY | | Tue Jun 04 1991 12:30 | 23 |
| > Should we pump the well for a long time, like all day, and then retest?
> Or is retesting necessary?
> Also, was it bad for the well pump people to add bleach to the new
> well?
Not bad, In fact is done often to treat new wells or wells that have
been sitting for a while. One or two treatments usually takes care of
the bateria and then its just a matter of time to flush the chlorine
out of the well.
What probably happened when they dumped the chlorine in was that it
coated the side of the pipe and well hole before it got to the water.
I would run the pump some more and use a hose to wash down the well
hole as you do it. This will help to get the rest of the chlorine down
into the water as well as sand/grit/dirt and other stuff you'll find
in a new well. Give this a chance to settle and then run the pump some
more too drain that out. Repeat as necessary.
Charly
P.S. They sell some nice clean water in little bottles at most grocery
stores :-)
|
58.89 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jun 04 1991 12:33 | 25 |
| Nope, adding bleach is fine. It disinfects the well. You
have to do that will all new wells, and occasionally for
existing wells. The "chlorine level too high" merely means
that it was too high for the lab to give you a meaningful
coliform test. You can pump more water out of the well for
a while to get rid of the chlorine, then take another sample.
The testing lab can give you a sterile bottle for collecting the
sample in.
I don't know what the bank requirements are; I think the only
one that *REALLY* matters is the coliform test. They may
have additional requirements for iron and manganese levels,
but you can fix that with a water softenener if those levels
bother them. The water is certainly drinkable regardless of
the iron and manganese levels; you may just have hard water
and orange toilet bowls if you don't treat the water. The
test report probably said "undrinkable" only because the
chlorine level kept them from doing a definitive test for
colifrm; at least, that's my guess. Ask the lab about it.
Let peace and calm prevail; sit in a quiet corner and say "Om".
Having been through two house purchases and a bad well myself,
I can sympathize, but in fact I don't think you have any real
problems...just annoyances. I think all will be okay in the end.
|
58.90 | Good | HPSTEK::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Tue Jun 04 1991 13:03 | 13 |
| Whew - that's encouraging. Thanks for the quick replies. It sounds
like we need to just flush it a bit more before we order our water
treatment equipment. By the way, the other items were really
excellent. The pH is 7.3. The hardness number was 103, where 75-150
is normal hardness.
re: .52 run a hose
Can we just recirculate the water from the well to wash the pipe down?
It makes sense that there would be junk left on the sides from
drilling. I think turbidity was above the maximum, too.
Elaine
|
58.91 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jun 04 1991 14:08 | 9 |
| re: .54
Yep, run the hose back down the well to disinfect the sides of the
casing. That's normal procedure; dump in the chlorine, then circulate
the water through a hose, washing down the sides of the well. A
new well is pretty muddy; the turbidity should improve over time.
It takes a while though.
By the way, you don't need a whole lot of bleach. If you can taste
it in the water, you have PLENTY.
|
58.579 | BAIL IT AND MEASURE | SONATA::HARBOLD | | Wed Jun 05 1991 11:53 | 20 |
| During the drilling operation water is used to lubricate the bit. By
knowing the amount of water put down the well, the driller can bail the
well from time to time and measure the amount of water in the well.
Obviously if you are taking more out than you put in, you are getting
water. A bailer is a large tube the fits inside the hole with a plunge
valve at the end. The bailer has a given capacity for its size. The
bailer is lowered and emptied until the water is drawn back down. A
final check can be done, where after a few minutes the bailer is lower
again and the level checked. The difference represents the gallons of
water entering the well within the time frame and the calculation of
gallons per minute can be made.
For percussion drillers (spudders) the sound of the drilling indicates
when there is a need to empty out the water. Spudders do not close the
small underground fissures of water and the driller can "build" a well
by drilling until the sum of all the little streams brings in the
number of gallons needed (usually 5 gal. /min). Rotaries tend to seal
up the small streams, so they have to go deeper till they reach a major
flow. The process though is about the same.
|
58.92 | RUN THE WATER | SONATA::HARBOLD | | Wed Jun 05 1991 11:59 | 6 |
| During the process of drilling the well the ground and rocks get
puverized and the hole area gets disturbed. Drillers usually put on
their big pumps and really draw the well down and force clean water
in. Your apparently did not do this and you will have to run the
pump. Run it for a 24 hour period and then retest. I had a well we
disturbed and it took several days to clear. After that it was great.
|
58.93 | One more river crossed | HPSTEK::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Wed Jun 05 1991 12:42 | 16 |
| I talked to the bank yesterday. They are mostly concerned about
coliform bacteria and arsenic. Our test passed both, so we are all set
to close. That gives us the time to hook up the electricity to pump
the well for a longer time.
Thanks for the sanity checking. When I spoke to my husband last night,
he said you all confirmed what the lab technician told him when he
picked up the results. I didn't know that, but it made for a good
independent check!
re: .56
We weren't there when the driller finished his work, so I'm not sure
if he did draw the well down or not.
Elaine
|
58.580 | Flow Rate in an Existing Well - the hard way..... | ZENDIA::CHASE | Bruce Chase, Suffering thru MASS hysteria | Wed Jun 05 1991 14:18 | 32 |
| When we purchased out place in 1978 we were told that the reason
we had a 500' deep well was because it had a less than 1 GPM flow
rate.
Thirteen years and ~$5K later, we now have a higher capacity well
(nearly 7 GPM), a new and larger pump, a new and larger motor,
plastic instead of iron pipe, diaphram instead of air tank, and
a $1.8K investment in, what is called in the industry, a
"hydro-frac". (An Oil Industry technique for opening up cracks
in rock)
The problems that lead to all this expense are too many to elaborate
on here. My contributions to this note are two:
The increased capacity is due to the hydro-frac substantially
opening up the vein(s) of water.
How did we determine the flow rate? The well company placed a
"test-head" on the top of the well when all this was finished.
They let the pump run for 24hrs (to allow the well to become
fully pumped down. What comes out after that is exactly what is
being supplied from the aquifer (sp).
It is doubtful that you will burn out your motor, because it is
beneath the pump and therefore is never left without water around
it. The heat will be conducted thru the water and if need be to
the surrounding ledge.
Bruce
Who now enjoys watering his lawn!
|
58.581 | | CECV03::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Mon Jun 10 1991 12:26 | 10 |
| we just dug a well (late last year) at our home in Vermont. The rate
of flow was determined (roughly) by pumping the well dry (in our case,
that took about 1.5 hours of pumping at several hundred gallons per
hour, and then measuring the time for the well to fill up. you must
calculate the holding capacity for your well, then simple arithmetic
will give you the approximate yield. If you have a well yielding 1.5
gallons per minute, you probably have more than enough water for normal
households.
tony
|
58.582 | 1.5 GAL/MIN IS NOT ENOUGH | 57454::HARBOLD | | Mon Jun 10 1991 12:41 | 16 |
| If my memory is right, the usual minimum is 3 gal/min and you aim for 5
gal/min. With anything less that 3 g/m you start to have to build in
extra storage or ration water usage. Think of maximum use. How much
to wash the car or water the lawn, draw bath water, and wash clothes?
To do all that plus have water available for drinking you need to have
a good well.
When you can only get the 1.5 g/m you have to build up the storage
capacity. The most expensive, but probably the best from a water
quality point of view is to have a deep and large diameter well. This
provides a natural collection point for the pump to access. In
addition you can add large storage tanks. Since pumps usually pump
much faster than 1.5 g/m you need to build in a recovery timer so that
the pump will cut off and on until the storage tank is full. My
in-laws are in the water well business in New York, and I have seen
them use both techniques.
|
58.583 | 5 gal/per min min | CPDW::PALUSES | | Mon Jun 10 1991 14:19 | 8 |
|
Every house I bought in Massachusetts which used a well, needed to
have a min of 5 Gal/per min. I think the lender required this and
I also believe that it was or was soon to be state law.
Bob
|
58.584 | how special | KAYAK::GROSSO | Prevent & Prepare or Repent & Repair | Thu Jun 13 1991 12:59 | 3 |
|
Shucks, everytime I get in my car, I just feeeeeeel safer when I cross the
border into Massachusetts, knowing they go alllll them laws to protect me.
|
58.585 | | VMSSG::NICHOLS | It ain't easy being green | Thu Jun 13 1991 13:50 | 3 |
| You might consider sending your observation to the Manchester Union
Leader.
It's pretty well know for publishing trash.
|
58.586 | | WUMBCK::FOX | | Fri Jun 14 1991 09:34 | 2 |
| Why? Nackey says the same thing at least one a month in her
editorials.
|
58.695 | Another well/tank question | JUPITR::MENARD | | Tue Jun 18 1991 09:40 | 19 |
| I have another well/tank question.
Two weeks ago the lines coming into my house were struck by lightning.
It blew my vcr, tripped all the breakers and messed up my well. I had
to let all the faucets run for 6+ hours to clear the water up. Since
that time, my pressure is only 2/3 of what it use to be. The past few
days the water out of the kitchen faucet pulsates (high pressure/low
pressure).
I called the company who originally installed the well/tank 5 1/2 yrs
ago. He said my tank is gone and it'll cost $350 to have a new one
installed. Of course the old tank was only guaranteed for 5 years. He
also said he doubts it's related to the lightning.
Is that all a tank lasts - 5 years? Is $350 reasonable? How do I tell
if the tank is really gone?
Thanks for any advice/feedback.
Kathy
|
58.696 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jun 18 1991 10:26 | 22 |
| re: .18
It sounds more likely to me that the lightning fried the pressure switch
that turns the pump on and off. The switch is set up so it turns on
at, say, 30 pounds and turns off at 50 pounds. I can imagine that the
lightning did it in so it turns on and off at a lower setting and with
little or no pressure differential. It may be down around 0, so you
get pump pressure/no pump pressure alternating.
At least, I'd check on that first. You probably have a pressure gauge
on the tank somewhere. Turn on a faucet and watch the gauge. It
should start at 50 lbs or so, slowly drop to about 30, then the
pump should come on so the gauge climbs back to 50 again.
If the pressure drop is rapid from 50 to 30 (or whatever the numbers
are) but the numbers are in the right range, then the tank may be
waterlogged (the air cushion in it may be gone). This can be fixed,
at least temporarily, by pumping air back into the tank. If the numbers are
down around 5-25 or something, then I'd look at the pressure switch.
I think I'd call another pump outfit for an opinion before spending
$350 for a new tank. 5 years seems like an awfully short time, if
it's any kind of quality brand at all. I've got a Gould that is 9
years old and doing just fine. Of course, it depends in part on what
your water is like, but I wouldn't expect a tank to go in 5 years.
|
58.697 | | JUPITR::MENARD | | Tue Jun 18 1991 11:01 | 11 |
| Thanks, Steve.
I did turn the water on last p.m. and watch the guage - the entire time
I was watching it stayed at 40. However, when I went back upstairs
something "kicked-in" and I all of a sudden got tremendous pressure
(like I use to) out of the faucet. I'll try it again tonight.
I will call another company for a second opinion.
Thanks,
kathy
|
58.698 | Insurance | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Tue Jun 18 1991 14:04 | 8 |
| Re .18
Keep in mind that your homeowner's insurance will cover the cost
of repair of the well pressure switch if it was indeed caused by
a lightning strike.
PBM
|
58.699 | | JUPITR::MENARD | | Tue Jun 18 1991 15:38 | 10 |
| Can they tell that it was from lightning? I'm convinced it is, as I
didn't have any problems at all til the strike, then my water was
disgustingly orange. After running it for a few hrs it turned an aqua
color (which had the equivalent of rock dust on the bottom after
settling). It took 6 hrs to get it decent and then still stayed cloudy
for about a week.
Yet the well guy said he doubted that's what it was from (but he has
not yet been out to check).
|
58.700 | Get what you're paying for | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Tue Jun 18 1991 16:25 | 9 |
| I doubt that you will get any objection from your insurance company
if you submit all lightning-strike-related claims at one time:
the water system, the VCR - if you have one, check your garage
door opener, your microwave oven controls, your furnace thermostats,
your stereo, telephone answering machine - any electronic or
electrical device.
PBM
|
58.701 | Obstruction? | XK120::SHURSKY | <DETOUR> Easy Street under repair. | Wed Jun 19 1991 09:11 | 7 |
| Could it be some sort of obstruction? You seem to have had a great deal
of sediment in your water. Some of it may be occluding a pipe or valve
or something in the system. Is the problem noticeable at all faucets?
Then it is unlikely to be an obstruction unless it is at the source. (the
tank perhaps?)
Stan
|
58.702 | | JUPITR::MENARD | | Wed Jun 19 1991 10:18 | 12 |
| More info...
This a.m. I turned the faucet on, ran down and watched the guage.
It initially read about 20+ and proceeded to climb slowly to about 50,
at which time I heard a click (pump turning on?), then the pressure
very slowly started dropping. When I went back upstairs I had terrific
pressure coming out of the faucet.
When is the pump suppose to kick in?
The well guy is coming out tomorrow.
|
58.703 | That much sounds pretty normal | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Wed Jun 19 1991 12:12 | 9 |
| While the pressure was climbing, the pump was running. The click
you heard would be the pump turning *off*. What you describe here
sounds normal. If you're getting insufficient pressure sometime,
the question may be whether the pump turns *on* at the right time.
Normally the pump will fill the pressure tank until the air in the
tank is pressurized to about 50psi, then shut off (as you
observed). As you draw water from the tank, the pressure will drop
until it's around 20-30 psi at which point the pump should turn on
again. Does it ever go lower than that?
|
58.704 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jun 19 1991 12:15 | 13 |
| re: .25
Sounds about right; the click at 50 psi was the pump turning OFF;
it must have turned on before you got there (down around 20 psi).
If the pressure gets too low before the pump comes on, you can
adjust the pressure switch so the pump comes on at a higher pressure
(at 30 psi instead of 20 psi, perhaps). It sounds though as though
the pressure switch is working properly.
So do you still have a problem, or has it cured itself?
re: .24
Good point about the dirt; the aerator screen on the faucet can
get clogged and make it look like low water pressure.
|
58.705 | | JUPITR::MENARD | | Wed Jun 19 1991 12:56 | 15 |
| I have cleaned the screen on the faucet. I have 1/2 the pressure of
what I use to for about the first minute - during this time, the water
kinda pulsates out of the faucet. After about a minute all of a
sudden the pressure doubles then it's fine til I shut it off and turn
it back on again.
It sounds like maybe the pressure switch just needs adjusting? I'm not
sure what point it's clicking on - by the time I get there I think the
pump is already on and that's between 20-30 psi.
Are there any screens in the tank or pump that may need to be cleaned
due to all that sediment?
Thanks,
Kathy
|
58.706 | | MANTHN::EDD | Edd Cote | Wed Jun 19 1991 13:07 | 4 |
| Doesn't sound like a pressure switch problem. Did you say if it was
just one faucet, or all of them?
Edd
|
58.707 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jun 19 1991 13:34 | 6 |
| Try turning on the water, then staying at the pressure gauge and
watching the complete cycle of pressure drop, pump on, pressure
rise, pump off, pressure drop, pump on,... a few times.
The pump may just be coming on at too low a pressure. It doesn't
really sound like an obstruction to me. Hard to tell though.
|
58.708 | 20 psi is LOW | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Wed Jun 19 1991 13:41 | 11 |
|
I was told that the pressure range should be between 40 and 60
psi. Ratings with shower heads and sprinklers confirm this. The
jerk who installed mine had it set way to low. I re-adjusted it
myself. It is just two simple screw adjustments to set the cutoff
point and delta. Do be careful, because inside the box there is
live 220v.
Now my pressure is great until the screen in front of the iron
filter clogs up. With watering a new lawn, that happens once a
week :-(
|
58.709 | I don't think 20 psi is to low | PARITY::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Wed Jun 19 1991 15:07 | 9 |
| My well is set for turning on at 20psi and off at 40psi.
I have never encountered any problems or noticeable changes in flow.
Well, except the one time when I was filling the washing machine while
running the dishwasher, wife in the shower and watering the lawn.
I don't think the 20-40 or 20-50 psi range would cause any problems.
(Maybe the place to look would be at the air bladder charge to the
water tank? Isn't this what regulates (smooths out) the water
pressure?)
|
58.710 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Jun 19 1991 16:55 | 37 |
| Everything here is speculation. Without "hands-on" inspection no
one can tell what your situation is.
That said, here are my ideas.
(1) Our system was originally set for ~20-40 PSI. When our pump
failed the original installer wasn't available, so we had the pump
replaced by another company. There were very surprised that it was
set that low. After consulting with me they re-set it to 40-60PSI.
Although I had not recognized this as a problem before, I surely
recognized the improvement with the higher pressure. Based on this
I would recommend a setting of at least 30-50 and preferably
40-60.
(2) It does seem unlikely that the bladder in you air tank is bad
after only five years. It also seems strange that this would cause
the sort of pulsation that you describe. I'd expect simply a total
failure to provide pressure with the pump not running, or maybe an
inability to build up pressure at all. While it could be the air
tank -- I'm no water well expert! -- it sounds to me more like and
obstruction somewhere in you system. Maybe the lightning knocked
something loose? When the pressure is high enough water gets by;
when its lower you get pulsation.
Is there a hose bib -- i.e. a facet with hose threads -- at your
air tank? If so, connect a hose to it and run the hose to a drain
or outside. Turn on the hose and see if it has good, constant
pressure. If it does NOT, then the problem is in the air tank,
pump or controls. If the hose has good constant pressure, then it
is likely that the problem is an obstruction in your pipes. If all
of your facets have the same problem, then the obstruction is
probably in one of the main pipes in the basement, maybe real
close to the air tank. How do you find it? Short of taking pipes
apart and checking them I don't have an answer. I suppose you
could probe straight lengths with a stiff wire. I think the answer
is that finding an obstruction can be a real pain. (read messy and
expensive.)
|
58.711 | | MANTHN::EDD | Edd Cote | Wed Jun 19 1991 17:50 | 13 |
| A broken diaphragm in the air tank, resulting in a loss of the
pre-charge will cause the pressure switch to cycle the pump VERY
quickly, on the order of seconds.
A SWAG - Could there be a length of pipe with trapped air in it
someplace in the system? Conceivably the air column could compress
and expand under the relatively low pressure of a system where the PSI
is about to kick the pump on. Once the pump kicks in, the pressure
would be high enough to keep the column compressed...
A rarely used faucet feed seems like a likely culprit...
Edd
|
58.712 | could be a disolved gas | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Wed Jun 19 1991 19:16 | 8 |
| another shot in the dark...
If you fill a glass with water, is it clear, or cloudy then
clearing in a minute or so. If the latter (kind of like
carbonated), then you have gasses disolved in your water. We have
methane in ours, which sometimes causes sputtering. Some of our
neighbors have high enough methane levels that they can light
their faucets!
|
58.713 | Split pipe or Loose wire | CHART::CBUSKY | | Thu Jun 20 1991 09:41 | 15 |
| And yet another shot in the dark...
You could have a problem IN the well such as a split pipe. While the
pump was running, you'd could have variations in pressure. Once your
house system gets up to pressure, the pump would shut off and then the
pressure would be more consistant.
Or a loose wire at the pump. As the pump runs it could be making and
breaking a connection causing the problem. There's alot of torque with
a submerged well pump.
Either one of these problems could have been induced or aggravated by
the lighting.
Charly
|
58.714 | An apparent catch 22 with low pressure | CSCMA::DENCE | | Thu Jun 20 1991 11:29 | 23 |
| I had a similar problem with pulsing and low pressure. I have a
whole house filter that became clogged and created low pressure.
I just purchased the house and the previous owner apparently stopped
maintaining the filter. I replaced the filter, but found little
difference. Apparently there is a catch 22 when the filter is clogged.
Sediment (maybe caused by your lighting strike) apparently lies
in the bottom of the horizontal pipes and collects there because
of the low pressure. When the filter is replaced the initial high
pressure forces some of this sediment to the filter, which in turn
clogs again, creating the impression that the filter replacement
did not contribute to solving the problem. I solved my problem
by removing the filter, replaced the filter housing, opened both
of my outside faucets ( I know should not filter outside water,
but I just bought the house), turned the filter shutoff back on
and watched a large amount of sediment/rust (house is on the Cape)
clear through the filter housing. When it appeared clear a minute
or so, I replaced the filter and have excellent pressure. I will
make this procedure part of the normal filter replacement process.
I also have a question as to how often I should have to replace
the filter element as measured by you experienced "well folks".
I know "when pressure is decreased", but, I'm looking for a ballpark
figure if for no other reason to compare the condition of my well
with others. I
|
58.715 | Three month filter life | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Thu Jun 20 1991 13:58 | 10 |
| Re .37
We have a whole-house, double-cartridge sediment filter. We use
about 700 gallons/week. We replace the filter every three months.
I began with monthly, tried every two months, now I'm up to three.
The filter is obviously black with trapped sediment and brown/red
with oxidized iron, but the pressure remains high and the filter is
apparently still functional after three months.
PBM
|
58.716 | speaking of filters... | CECV01::BEAN | Attila the Hun was a LIBERAL! | Fri Jun 21 1991 08:53 | 16 |
| re: a few of the previous replies
Never thought of filtering the water. We draw water (which seems to be
excessively SOFT to me) from a dug well about 150 ft from our home. My
pump/air tank is located in the cellar, and we normally cycle pressure
at 20/40 psi (I'll raise it a bit when I'm thru installing the rest of
the plumbing, some day)... the inlet pipe is 1", passing thru the
cellar wall, then up across the ceiling into an insulated "warm room"
where most of the plumbing is located.
What sort of "things" are addressed by filters? My water is clear, and
plenteous... is there some sort of indicator to look for which would
point to needing any kind of filter? Are there any safety related
issues?
tony (who is nearly totally ignorant about wells and such)
|
58.717 | | JUPITR::MENARD | | Fri Jun 21 1991 14:15 | 12 |
| The man from the well company came out yesterday.
My pump was coming on/shutting off too low (20/40). He adjusted it to
come on at 40, shut off at 60 and it is great now. There is still some
pulsating, but now as noticeable now that the pressure is greater. He
seems to think the pulsating is caused by the faucet fixture itself.
Since he made the adj., the toilet takes longer to shut-off and fills
to a higher level than before. Any connection to the adj he made?
Thanks,
Kathy
|
58.718 | Higher Pressure | XK120::SHURSKY | <DETOUR> Easy Street under repair. | Fri Jun 21 1991 14:36 | 5 |
| Yes. Higher pressure in your supply line means the float in the back of the
toilet must rise higher to generate enough force to close the valve. As long
as it shuts off you are fine. Any adjustment is 'to personal taste'.
Stan
|
58.719 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Jun 21 1991 17:31 | 35 |
| Filters:
If your water is very clear the filter could last for many months,
even a year or more. In this case I would replace it every 3 to at
most 6 months just for good luck.
If your water is very dirty (lots of sediment to remove) it could
clog completely in a few hours or less. In this case the filter
isn't much use. Let the water run for several hours or even a
couple days. If it doesn't turn reasonably clear you'll have to do
something to improve the well itself.
My guess is that the "average" life for a "typical" filter is from
at least 2-3 weeks up to 2-3 months. Note that the life of the
filter can vary. Some wells run clearer at some times of the year
and have more sediment at other times. Many wells tend to have
more sediment during the runoff of snow melt in the sprint and/or
after heavy rains. More sediment equates to shorter filter life.
Should you filter "clear" water? Its probably not necessary, but
there are two reasons to consider a filter. (1) There may be times
when that "clear" water suddenly becomes cloudy or muddy for a day
or two. I'd be nice to have the filter in place then. (2) Some
filters contain "activated charcoal" or other substances that can
remove undesirable taste from the water. These are often installed
for only one facet (often the kitchen) rather than the whole
house. If your water doesn't taste too good they may help.
I haven't priced cartridge filters lately but I'd expect that you
could buy one for something in the $20-35 range. Replacements
should cost in the $2-5 range. Neither price include installation.
The filter is easy to install if you've ever done any plumbing.
Cartridges can be replaced with no tools. (or at worst a wrench.)
I consider that a filter is a good investment if you're on a well
system; questionable if you have public water hookup.
|
58.720 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Jun 24 1991 14:22 | 7 |
| Re: 2259.40
The toilet has an adjustment to compensate for line presure. Since you
have a different presure now,the toilet should be readjusted for both
the correct level(tank line) and for fill time ( most are one minute).
Marc H.
|
58.721 | | JUPITR::MENARD | | Mon Jun 24 1991 17:27 | 6 |
| How do I adjust it? It is actually filling too high then draining back
down to the old level. I assume the adjustments are within the tank -
what specifically?
The shower is great now!!!! (Tho I don't think I'd enjoy it with a bad
sunburn:-)
|
58.722 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Jun 25 1991 13:20 | 15 |
| Well.....on my American Standard toilet,the level is adjusted by the
position of the bowl float.That is set by screwing the float in or out.
Try a small adjustment and see which way the water level goes,up or
down.
The fill "rate" is set by a small screw at the end of the float arm.
It adjusts the amount that the float will "fall" to,when the toilet
water drains out,during the flush. This screw raises or lowers the
float when there is no water in the tank.
Both adjustments interact somewhat...so make small changes and see
what happens. The normal setting is for the fill to take one minute
and stop right at the fill line.
Marc H.
|
58.956 | Well tank plumbing ... what's this thingie? | XANADU::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Wed Jul 03 1991 08:57 | 38 |
| Here's the plumbing around my well tank. My terms may not be correct.
electric pressure
to box ____ from well gauge
<----| |----< __
|____| tank ( ) check valve
~~~~ || | | ( ) ______
_______||_______||__________| |_______||______( )______
house <- _______________ ___________________ _____( )______ <- well
main | |_ | | ------
shut-off | | | |
|___| |___| drain
|| cock
What is this? .... ^^^^^ ~~~~
As I've tried to show, it's directly opposite the electric/plumbing
junction. And it's leaking (one drip every 20 seconds or so).
It resembles another "drain cock" but: 1. there's no "handle" to turn
(only a "cap" with "set at 75 psi" on it) and 2. the "faucet" is
threaded on the *in*side (and faces straight down 2 inches to the
floor). As near as I can tell, everything is brass up to the main
shut-off. It's all new (2 1/2 years) plumbing. It's all within a few
inches of the concrete floor.
Might a threaded plug might stop the drip, if I can find the right size?
It's upstream of the main shut-off, so, if I wanted to fiddle any more
with it, I'd have to turn off the pump, drain the tank? and ? I might
want to investigate further because I'm curious (concerned?) WHY it's
leaking. Our water has rather low Ph (around 6.0), a little iron (1.2)
and a lot of radon (not picocuries, but *micro*curies). But 2 1/2
years? (We're treating our water downstream.)
Thanks for any help.
Jon
(Fwiw, I tried several notes, including 3121, 3157 et al ...)
|
58.957 | pressure relief valve | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jul 03 1991 09:19 | 10 |
| Pressure relief valve, in case your pump goes berserk and doesn't
shut off. Strictly speaking, it ought to be plumbed to a drain,
or outside, but I've never seen one that was (including mine!).
While you could put a threaded plug in it to stop the leak, I
don't think that would be a very good idea as it would totally
defeat its purpose. Probably it's just developed a small leak
and needs to be replaced. It ought to be attended to, I expect,
or you may wake up some morning with a basement full of water
if it really lets go.
|
58.958 | WHERE IS THE PLUG TO ADD AIR TO THE TANK? | SONATA::HARBOLD | | Fri Jul 19 1991 11:06 | 9 |
| In all the tank systems that I have had, somewhere close to the tank should
be a valve that lets us add air into the system. There are 2 types of tank
systems. The older and larger style were self charging, but most tankds today
have an intial charge and rely on minimal turbulance and a bladder to maintain
the air charge. However, over time these systems have to be recharged. That
valve usually resembles a tire valve.
Whether it is a pressure relief valve or the air charging value, I agree
that it should not be leaking and should be fixed.
|
58.848 | Run-Away Pump | CIMNET::DMURRAY | | Tue Jul 23 1991 13:26 | 12 |
| I have a problem with a pump that won't shut off. The house has town
water, but is supplemented with a pump and captive tank in the cellar
to boost low pressure - house is locate at the high point in the town.
The other day, the pump stayed on continuously. The guage was straining
close to 90 pounds when I shut off the power to the pump.
Any opinions on what might be wrong or how to fix it? What are the
appropriate parameters for turning the pump on/off? Do you call an
electrician or a plumber to do repairs on pumps?
Thanks,
Dave
|
58.849 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Jul 23 1991 13:43 | 12 |
| My guess:
There should be a pressure switch someplace near the air tank that
is supposed to shut off the pump. It's probably gone bad. Look
for a (probably) gray box, about 3" x 3" x 5" plumbed into a small
tee in the waterline with a wire going to the pump controller and
connected to the power supply. You'll need a plumber to change it.
Before you do that though, take the cover off. You should see two
springs that have threaded rods going through the middle of them with
nuts on top to control the spring pressure. The spring tensions control
when the pump comes on and shuts off. Something may be stuck in
there, so you could try (after turning off the power!!) fiddling with
the relay contacts to be sure everything is free to move.
|
58.850 | careful or it could be SHOCKING! | HOTWTR::ROBERTS_JO | Life IS fair - in the Pacific NW! | Wed Jul 24 1991 09:52 | 9 |
| Be sure the power is off before you start fiddlin with that gray box or
you could get a little excitement you don't want.
Also, I've seen the input (water) to this switch get plugged so it
can't sinse the water pressure. You would have to take it off the tee
to examine that part.
John
|
58.851 | a few more questions... | MR4DEC::DMURRAY | | Wed Jul 24 1991 13:08 | 32 |
|
re: 3411.17 & .18
Thanks for the inputs. A few more questions
<< is supposed to shut off the pump. It's probably gone bad. Look
<< for a (probably) gray box, about 3" x 3" x 5" plumbed into a small
<< tee in the waterline with a wire going to the pump controller and
<< connected to the power supply. You'll need a plumber to change it.
<< Before you do that though, take the cover off. You should see two
<< springs that have threaded rods going through the middle of them with
<< nuts on top to control the spring pressure. The spring tensions control
<< when the pump comes on and shuts off. Something may be stuck in
<< there, so you could try (after turning off the power!!) fiddling with
<< the relay contacts to be sure everything is free to move.
After shutting off the power, I examined the gray box and found that things
seemed to move ok. I could place a screwdriver under the plate that pivots and
shuts off the contact points (excuse the lack of proper terminology!) and that
moves up and does break the circuit (the relay contact points open).
There are 2 threaded rods - one longer than the other. I backed off the nut
on each and watched to see if that made any difference while the pump was
running, but it didn't seem to. The pump continued to run until I shut off the
power at about 80 pounds pressure. Do you know which one controls the upper
shut-off? I assumed it was the longer rod....
I am now suspecting that the water pipe that runs to this pressure switch might
be clogged, as suggested in note .18. Any other thoughts?
Thanks,
Dave
|
58.852 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Jul 24 1991 13:32 | 21 |
| I can never remember how the adjustments in those things work.
Sorry...maybe somebody else does.
I am leaning toward the suggestion that the inlet to the switch
is plugged up so it's not seeing any pressure. That sounds to me
like a good thing to check next, especially since nothing seems
stuck in the switch mechanism itself. You'll have to disconnect the
wiring to the switch and unscrew it off the tee fitting, turning off
power and relieving the water pressure in the line first, of course.
Another possibiity just occurred to me that will be pretty easy to
check: the relay coil in the switch may have developed an open
circuit someplace. Disconnect the wiring and put an ohmmeter
across the coil contacts to be sure you have continuity; you may
have to sort out which position the relay has to be in to get
power to the coil. Presumably, since the pump is running, the
power to the coil is "off". But probably the thing is just plugged
with crud or corroded so the pressure can't operate the switch.
I don't think those things are all that expensive (wild guess $50?)
and it wouldn't be all that hard to replace, if you get tired of
fooling around with it.
|
58.853 | Clean or Replace Switch (Sensor area) | ZENDIA::CHASE | Bruce Chase, Suffering thru MASS hysteria | Wed Jul 24 1991 14:19 | 7 |
| Had a similar problem a few years back. Bought a new switch.
Upon removal of the old switch I discovered the hole in the back
that senses water pressure was filled with a rusty sediment.
Cleaned it and it worked fine. Replaced it anyway figuring it
would just build up again on the old one all that much faster.
I guess a more thorough cleaning job could have deferred the need
for the new one. It was less than $50.
|
58.854 | But I'd do it again anyhow... | MANTHN::EDD | LOOP (lewp) n. See loop. | Wed Jul 24 1991 18:01 | 10 |
| Replacing a pressure switch is a pretty easy job...
...except when I do it. Then all the joints are corroded and I break
everyone of them back to, and on, the pressure tank!
One broken pressure switch ended up costing > $300....
:^(
Edd
|
58.959 | Chlorinating (Bleaching) a Well | RICKS::LADD | | Wed Aug 14 1991 13:59 | 27 |
| I plan on Chlorinating my well tomorrow and wanted a sanity check on what I'm
planning to do. First I tested the total plate count of bacteria in my
well. The test results showed a high amount of bacteria which suggests
chlorinating my well. The water also has a sulfur smell, especially the hot
water.
I have a pamphlet that explains the bleaching (chlorination) procedure but
it leaves a few things out:
o It suggests using at least a gallon of bleach for wells over 300 feet
deep. I don't know my well depth since the town hall (Stow) doesn't have
a record of it and we have had no luck finding the builder. I plan on
using a gallon and a half of bleach since the pamphlet said it's better
to over bleach than under bleach.
o Should I send the bleached water through the water softener or should I
bypass softener? I plan on bypassing my softener since I don't want to
harm it with the bleach.
o Should I send the bleached water through the water heater? I plan on
sending through the heater since I can't see how it could hurt.
o Where should I dispose of the chlorinated water? What do swimming pool
owners do when they drain their pools?
/Andy
|
58.855 | More well problems | DELNI::MCGORRILL | Its your turn anyway.. | Wed Aug 14 1991 14:17 | 7 |
| Well I to have a pump that runs and runs, but juststarted. Plus
I've lost pressure. barely can take a shower. there s bubbling
sound on the pipe coming in from the well. If I shut the pump off
a while, then turn it on, it pumps right up and shuts off. what could
cause this?, gulp have I run the well dry??
/Dean
|
58.960 | cycle the water through the well | ROYALT::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Thu Aug 15 1991 01:28 | 17 |
| > o Where should I dispose of the chlorinated water? What do swimming pool
> owners do when they drain their pools?
Normally you cycle the clorinated water through the well by taking a hose
from your hose and sending it into the well. Run this for several hours.
This guarantees that the chlorine is well distributed throughout the well.
Then run all your faucets and appliances, to get the chlorine through the
entire system.
Leave it sit for 24 hours with no water usage.
Then... it's just a matter of time before all the chlorine dissapates. It
takes about three days of normal usage. If you want to speed that up,
water your lawn. I think that low level of chlorine will not affect your
lawn (I've done that with no ill affects).
--tom
|
58.961 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Aug 15 1991 09:16 | 14 |
| You might ask a water softener dealer if clorine would hurt the
water softener. If you can, you really ought to disinfect it too.
Do the hose business as suggested in .1; connect up your garden
hose and run it into the top of the well. You can wash down the
inside of the well casing while you're at it and disinfect it
too.
Re: the amount of bleach to use. Basically, if you can taste it
in the water, you've got plenty. I think Rietzel (Reitzel?) Associates
in Boylston gave me a sheet once that told how much bleach to use
for a given volume of well, but I lost it a long time ago....
As you say though, extra won't hurt; it will just take longer
to clear out. I'd be amazed if you need 1.5 gallons, but it won't hurt.
|
58.856 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Aug 15 1991 09:19 | 5 |
| re: .23
Sounds suspiciously like it to me.... I was first thinking it might
be a leak in the pipe coming in from the well, but the fact that
it works when you give the well a chance to recover sure sounds like
you're pumping the well dry.
|
58.857 | I think that you may have a leak ... | CRLVMS::BLACK | Andrew P. Black | Thu Aug 15 1991 18:23 | 56 |
| Yes, you have run the well dry. The question is: why?
At our house, we can do this by running the garden hoses. But then,
after the hoses are shut off, we can wait for a half hour and
everything is back to normal.
Then, a year or so ago, the well started to go dry spontaneously. Boy,
was I scared.
It turned out that there was a leak in the (plastic) pipe comming from
the well to the house. So, the pump would pump and pump and pump, and
some of the water would get through the pipe to the tank, but some
would leak out of the split into the soil. Thus, water useage was
higher than usual, and the well went dry.
To test for this, try adjusting the high-pressure shutoff point on the
pump switch. For example, our switch was set to shut off after the
pump had established 50 lb/in2 pressure in the tank. I adjusted it
down to 20lb/in2, and everything worked fine! (for a while). What was
happening here is that the flow through the leak in our pipe was
greater at higher pressures (not surprisingly). At 45 lb, the leak was
enough to cause essentially *all* of the water to leak out of the hole,
and *none* to get to the tank, so the pump would run continuously, and
the well would be run dry. At 25lb, the leak was small, and enough
water got to the tank to turn of the pump.
As time went on, the leak got worse, so eventually it would only work
at about 10lb/in2. So, this is not a permanaet fix.
If this is your problem, the solution is to fix the pipe, which
means splicing in a new section. A well company can do this: the only
problem is in *finding* the leak. If you don't know where the pipe
runs, you have two choices:
(1) start digging at one end and hope you find it before you go too
far
(2) hire a water diviner (dowser). Yes,it really works.
If the leak is under the house, you may just have to run a complete new
pipe. This is better than digging up your foundations.
The good news is that this problem is *much* cheaper to fix than
making your well deeper to get more flow.
[[ How do I know all this? It happend to me, of cousre. The well
company started digging by making a hole in the slab where the pipe
entered the pump closet. They found the leak within 2 feet of the
floor! It was where the pipe had been bent at a sharp angle. The
fixed the pipe by splicinga peice in, and cenented it all up again.
It cost me $100 -- I had been looking at several thousand to make the
well deeper. ]]
Andrew
|
58.962 | what to do while treating well? | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Thu Aug 15 1991 19:23 | 2 |
| What are you supposed to dring for the couple days that your well
is full of chlorine? Do you just take a vacation?
|
58.963 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Aug 16 1991 10:26 | 4 |
| I seem to recall that I bought a couple gallons of bottled water.
You will have to flush the toilet occasionally, of course.
A vacation is alaways a good idea, whatever the excuse! ;-)
|
58.964 | how often | CSTEAM::BURSTALL | | Fri Aug 16 1991 12:54 | 1 |
| How ofter is it recommended to clorinate a well
|
58.965 | Well disinfecting | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Fri Aug 16 1991 13:00 | 10 |
| Re .5
Chlorinating a well is usually done only (1) when it is first drilled,
or (2) if a water test shows coliform bacteria present. There are
many types of bacteria, and wells are loaded with them, but so is the
air you breathe and the food you eat; the only bacteria that require
well disinfecting are coliform bacteria.
PBM
|
58.966 | what about iron bacteria? | POBOX::KAPLOW | Set the WAYBACK machine for 1982 | Fri Aug 16 1991 17:48 | 10 |
| What about bacterial iron or whatever the stuff is called. I seem
to have lots of the stuff, and my iron filter will not remove it.
The iron filter does remove the brown color that used to be in my
tap water. After the water sits a while, in the toilet tank,
dishwasher, or laundry, it starts oxidizing brown again. It now
seems much worse than when we moved in 18 months ago.
Some neighbors have suggested chlorinating the well to kill the
iron bacteria. Has anyone else had this problem, or know if
clorinating the well will fix things?
|
58.858 | me_too | SA1794::DOWSEYK | Kirk Dowsey 243-2440 | Fri Aug 16 1991 18:21 | 7 |
|
I have the same problem. Mine is due to rusting of the pumps
cast iron impeller housing. The only time it is a problem is when the
well is about to run dry. I will not replace the pump until it dies,
in the meantime I have a free "low water alarm". 8^)
Kirk
|
58.859 | | 18717::FILGATE | Bruce Filgate SHR3-2/W4 237-6452 | Tue Aug 20 1991 10:02 | 20 |
| re: .23
I've run into this personally twice in the last year and a half, the pressure is
zip, but the water can be heard to bubble somewhere. Turn the pump off then on
and it sometimes pumps up ok.
In my case the fault was traced to the starting relay in the control box, the
pump would turn only slowly, and not come up to full speed. Jacuzzi apparently
has/had a bad batch of starting relays, the electric contact plate falls free
from the solinoid actuator, hence the starting winding will never get energized
on the well pump. After the second call to have the relay (probably a $4 part)
replaced for big bucks, I disassembled the relay and rebuilt it using epoxy on
the defective rivet (this has now been in service about 12 months). I also
disassembled the only defective unit to verify the fastener failure.
I'd vote for the control box failure for these reasons.
Good luck!
Bruce
|
58.967 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Aug 20 1991 11:21 | 16 |
| re: .6
nit: coliform bacteria are in fact not harmful, but they are a
good indicator of the presence of sewage contamination because
coliform live in the intestines of warm-blooded animals; you've
got millions of 'em in you right now.
re: .7
I don't think you have iron bacteria, necessarily. I may be wrong on
this, but I think iron bacateria make nodules and can clog up your pump.
It sounds as though you just have dissolved iron in the water. After
it sits for a while in an open container (like a toilet bowl), it
oxidixes, turns to rust, and precipitates out of the water as brown
sludge. I would think that your iron filter (if it's a true iron
filter) should get rid of the dissolved iron as well as the particulate
iron in the water; are you sure it's working properly?
|
58.860 | Patch/replace? | DELNI::MCGORRILL | Its your turn anyway.. | Tue Aug 20 1991 14:15 | 7 |
| rep .25
thats it!, I had a guy out to look at it. he charged it with air,
then as he wsa about to leave, we noticed water bubbling up outside!
So I have a leak to fix - I'm wondering if I should replace the whole
run, or just patch?
/Dean
|
58.861 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Aug 20 1991 14:27 | 5 |
| I'd vote for the whole run, with the best possible quality pipe
I could find. Assuming you're going to hire a backhoe to dig
the old pipe up anyway, the incremental cost of getting him to
dig up the whole thing will be minimal, and you won't need to
worry about it.
|
58.862 | Might not be necessary to dig | DDIF::FRIDAY | CDA: The Holodeck of the future | Tue Aug 20 1991 14:49 | 13 |
| When we had our addition done I was concerned because it
was going to be directly over the pipe from the well to
the house, and what if it sprang a leak!
The person who did the foundation told me that it would
not be necessary to dig to fix such a problem. According
to him it's possible to feed another narrower pipe through
the existing one. And another possibility is to attach a
piece of replacement tubing to the bad pipe, and then,
using a winch on the other end, literally pull the old
pipe out, which will drag along the new tubing.
You might check out those possibilities.
|
58.968 | Chlorinate every 2 years for shallow wells | NAC::SCHLENER | | Tue Aug 20 1991 18:54 | 14 |
| I have a shallow well (about 25 - 30 ft) and chlorinate it every 2
years. It took about 5 days for the chlorine smell to go away. Probably
people thought that I had starting swimming in the morning at some town
pool or something.
I let the chlorine go through the hot water heater. So far - so good.
Also, I don't think chlorine will have any affect on iron since it is
a metal. The chlorine will kill the bacteria in the water. If you
are having problems with your water due to discoloration, you should
check the water pipes as well as getting a water test done on your well
water.
Cindy
|
58.863 | power loss, then no water? | KALI::HASTINGS | | Wed Aug 21 1991 17:18 | 15 |
| I had a minor problem, maybe someone here could explain it.
After hurricane Bob came through we lost power. When it came back we
had no water. I checked the pump and it was purring along nicely, I
checked the well and could see that there was water down there. Still
there was no water pressure.
Was this caused by the pipes draining back into the well? Did the
well need to be primed somehow? What could cause the pump to run and
not pump water? (Remember the water level in the well is fine as is all
of the plumbing, and the pump is working perfectly.)
I had someone come out to look at it. I don't know what was done
but the problem is solved. I'd just like to know what was done so that
I can do it next time if necessary.
|
58.864 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | I've fallen and I can't go boom! | Thu Aug 22 1991 02:25 | 15 |
| I presume this is a shallow well pump by the fact you can see the water in
the well?
Anyway, your pump just lost its prime. The pump blades just spin in the air
and do nothing.
My father has an unwinterized cottage that has a shallow well pump that must
be drained every fall and primed in the spring. There is a "T" connector
with a plug in the pipe from the well to the pump, the plug is removed, a
funnel is inserted, and water from a bucket is poured in until the pump starts
drawing, then the pipe plug is replaced.
Depending on how long you were without power, your foot valve may be marginal.
-Mike
|
58.865 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Aug 22 1991 09:18 | 9 |
| I'll second the "foot valve" as no good. The foot valve is located in
the bottom of the pipe that is in the well. It's to keep the water
from draining out of the pipe...and thus having no prime or water
for the pump to pump against.
Some pumps have a one-way valve in the pump body that should do the
same thing. Bottom line.....you lost your pump prime.
Marc H.
|
58.866 | sand between the toes | BTOVT::CACCIA_S | the REAL steve | Thu Aug 22 1991 13:03 | 10 |
|
Agreed the problem was a lost prime. And also agreed - depending on how
long the power was out, check the foot valve. I had a shallow well in
another house and lost power for a couple of days, and lost the pump
prime. I was lucky though, the valve was good but was being kept from
closing 100% by gravel that had be sucked up. I questioned the well guy
and he said OHH YEAH> it happens all the time even with screens over
the intake. If you find gravel in your faucet screens or in your
filter that may be the problem.
|
58.922 | Help moving a piano? | CARWSH::MURRAY | | Mon Sep 16 1991 18:06 | 21 |
| Greetings!
My wife and I have always wanted to own a piano and have waited for a good
price on a used one. Well, our day has come! Now, we've bought a piano
but it's still at the house of the person we bought it from.
This person claims that he and his son moved it there (it's a baby grand)
and that it wasn't so hard (granted he's a 6'6" former pro-athlete).
Anyone out there have any experience/recommendations/horror stories about
DYI piano moving? Having it moved by experts would cost quite a bit more
than the piano itself, so I'd like to avoid it just on principle (plus, I
don't have the bucks!)
Thank you in advance for any advice! And please don't tell me not to but
-- that's "BUY" -- something I have no way of actually moving. I already
_know_ that!
Regards,
Rich Murray
|
58.923 | | HDLITE::TINGLOF | | Mon Sep 16 1991 18:56 | 8 |
| I remember moving a baby grand piano by standing it on edge on a four
wheeled dolly, then removing the legs, and then rolling it out the
door. The top panel and keyboard cover are probably also removable.
It shouldn't be that heavy, unless its really old, and more than two
people simply get in the way when moving through doors, etc.
-Mike
|
58.924 | You can always pay someone | BROKE::LEE | Just trying to get stuff to work | Mon Sep 16 1991 19:53 | 1 |
| There are piano movers.
|
58.925 | Check out Piano Tuners | SOLVIT::YEE | | Mon Sep 16 1991 20:41 | 10 |
| We just looked into moving a piano. Somebody told me that you need to
worry about packing it properly (like holding down the hammers and
internals, etc). Piano movers are supposed to know how to do this.
Piano movers are expensive.
You might also want to check with piano tuners for recommendations on
moving a piano. You ought to have the piano tuned once it is moved
to its new home.
Ed
|
58.926 | Thanks! + some follow-ups. | CARWSH::MURRAY | | Mon Sep 16 1991 23:16 | 34 |
| RE: 1, 3
Good advice! Thanks! Exactly the kind of stuff I had in mind.
Someone here suggested the local public library might have a book on
it(!?) But, VAXnotes is a sort of a Natural Language Query System
(NLQS) and I like being on the cutting edge (the local Library, by
way of comparison, has just books and videos and the old style of card
catalogs).
RE: 2
But that wouldn't be DIY, strictly speaking. 8v)
I can see the importance of trying to prevent any kind of free moving
(i.e. "banging about") of parts and will provide for that. Removing every
possible source of additional weight and girth is a good one, too.
More Questions:
1) Should the main assembly be _shipped_ (i.e. trucked) in an upright
position? In what orientation? (i.e. keyboard end down, or, on it's
left side?)
2) Regarding shipping and de/re-assembling which is/are the best
(i.e. "least stressful") position(s) to keep the main assembly in?
3) What are some good materials to use for cushioning while moving something
this delicate?
Thanks again for the help so far!
Rich Murray (almost beginning to wish he had bought a 2nd hand digital
piano... "Yeah, I'll just toss it in the trunk! 8v) 8v)
|
58.927 | If you won't buy muscle, at least buy brains... | OS2PS2::taber | Desperately seeking | Tue Sep 17 1991 08:48 | 23 |
| I moved a fair number of grand pianos in my student days (assistantship
in the University theatre.) We didn't do anything real special. We (two
of us) unbolted the legs then lifted the piano off and put it
long-side-down on a dolly. The legs had bracing that let them stand
free, if yours don't then it's probably better to get the piano on its
side first, though you stand a much better chance of snapping the legs
off that way.
From my own experience with pianos, I'd recommend that you get a piano
technician in to look at the instrument before you move it (or pay for
it.) They'll be able to tell you if it's worth the effort (pianos aren't
like violins -- they get worse with age.) He'll also be able to tell you
if the action should be locked down or removed for shipping. I never
locked one down, but there's a lot of variation in design. You'll want
to have a tach on hand anyway to tune the instrument after you get it
home. It should sit for a while to settle. Given the time of year, if
you're in an area where you'll be turning the heat on soon, it would be
best to wait until the heat has been on for a couple of weeks before
having it tuned. The tech will probably explain all that. Look in the
yellow pages or call a piano store for the names of technicians in your
area.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
58.928 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Sep 17 1991 09:07 | 12 |
| I've moved some,during the summer school break. reply .5 had the
best advice. The only thing that I can add,is don't get alot of
your friends to help. Two or three people will do a much better
job than 5 or 6 people,as they seem to get in each other's way.
Also,don't get any manager types into the action. Its a sure way to
debate and talk the problem to death! I know,I once helped move a
church organ where some manager types were also ~helping~. They
kept talking,while me and some others just went about the work and did
it!
Marc H.
|
58.929 | | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Tue Sep 17 1991 09:12 | 6 |
| Check a rental place like Taylor. I know they have a widget called a piano
mover that works GREAT for upright pianos. It straps on, the handles fold out
which force the wheels down, giving you an easy method of moving and holding on.
They might have one that is tailored to doing grands, too. They also rent
furniture pads for wrapping around the thing to be moved.
|
58.930 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Sep 17 1991 11:01 | 7 |
| re: .7
Can you give a bit more detail about this upright piano mover? I
assume it somehow puts "big" wheels at both ends of the piano?
At some point we want to move our upright from the dining room
into the living room, and it's HEAVY; I've been wondering how
to go about it. It's the heaviest upright piano I've ever come
across.
|
58.931 | Horror Story | JOKUR::BASBAL::FALKOF | | Tue Sep 17 1991 14:27 | 33 |
| OK, you wanted a horror story...
We were moving out of our raised ranch style house, so the baby grand
had to go from the upstairs to the downstairs to go out. The front
stairs were no good because the overhang of the 2nd floor was too
close to the stair; the piano was to come down on a special padded
plank (like a skate board). Measure the clearance of the 3rd step and
the ceiling above to determine clearance. The mover and others confirm
that the 3rd step is the key.
Anyhow, our clearance was less than the width of the piano on the
plank, so it had to go out the kitchen door and down the outside
back stairs. The mover moved backwards and got it to the threshold
as his buddies pushed from inside. One more heave-ho and it plunked to
the deck. Well, that plunk could be heard for about 300 yards, judging
by the number of neighbors who came running. The deck collapsed with
the mover and piano both.
The piano fell into a bunch of pieces, including cracking the curved
back end (to be fixed with a clamping system with about 30,000 lbs
tension, they said). The mover was jarred, but he refused medical
treatment then and thereafter (much to my relief and that of my
insurance company).
So far, you say that was a sad story, but not a horror story. Well, my
friend, this was on a Wednesday and Friday was the closing when we sold
the house. This note series is about piano moving. I'll not bother with
what you do with a collapsed deck with nails and spikes pointing out,
debris, wrecked siding, and an imminent closing.
My advice: After you absorb everything in this note series etc, test
the path you plan to take and look for weaknesses enroute.
it
|
58.932 | | SNAX::HURWITZ | Things that make you go hmmmmmm | Tue Sep 17 1991 21:30 | 11 |
| re: stuff to cusion it with...
(think recycle!)
Talk a walk around your facility and pick up some boxes that office
equipment came in. Undoubtedly there are "blocks" of foam in these
boxes that were going to be thrown away anyway. I've found some pretty
large rectangles of pretty dense foam many times just walking around
the office areas.
Steve
|
58.933 | What I remember of the piano mover | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Wed Sep 18 1991 09:37 | 19 |
| It's been a while. What I remember is that the mover came in two
pieces, each looked like a modified hand truck with belts. Each piece
fit around the ends of the upright. The straps connected the two and
clamped together to make a very snug fit. The wheels are recessed sort
of, and the handles are folded down. When you fold the handles up and
out, they push the wheels down and lift the whole rig so that it rolls
around easily. When fully extended, the handles stick straight out at
each end (like parallel bars). They are high enough so that you only
have to bend slightly (at the knees!) to grab them. This is not
uncomfortable for wheeling around, and is the perfect height for when
you have to lift a little to get over a step or whatever.
When my friends moved, two thin, non-athletic, engineer types hooked up
the mover, rolled the piano out of the ground floor apartment, up the
ramp and into the moving van. They lowered the handles, and the piano
stayed put for the ride (packed with other items around it). On
arriving at the new house, they rolled the whole thing down the ramp,
down a few steps, up an improvised ramp to the deck, and up 1 step into
the house.
|
58.934 | Overwhelmed by wealth of avocational expertise w/in DEC! | CARWSH::MURRAY | | Wed Sep 18 1991 11:27 | 22 |
| Whew! This stuff is great. Luckily for us, we'll be moving the beast from
a ground floor in its current home to the ground floor at my house so we
won't have to worry about collapsing stairs and decks, just collapsing
people.
Re: .11
The local rental store has two piano-moving related items: a piano
board and a piano dolly. The piano dolly sounds like what you are referring
to. It costs $17.00 to rent for a day. U-Haul is renting out a 14' box
truck for $30 a day + $.49/mile, so we should be able to keep the expenses
down below $75 (not including doctor bills and rehab. 8^) )
Does anyone know if either a piano board or piano dolly would be suitable
for moving a baby grand???
As always, thanks for all the well-targeted advice. And, keep the Faith,
DIY'ers!
Regards,
Rich Murray
|
58.935 | Not so difficult, SHE SAID!!! | WMOIS::MAY_B | IT'S LIKE THE SAME, ONLY DIFFERENT! | Fri Sep 20 1991 13:42 | 17 |
| The delivery person that delivered my babygrand was a 125lb female who
delivered it in the back of a small pick-up truck, on a 2'X3' dolly,
the piano on its side with a nylon strap holding on the dolly. She
took a heavy wood plate to bridge the pick-up bed to my front steps.
the Piano was perfectly balanced on the dolly and when she came to the
6 inch step up to the front door she simply pulled down on the piano
and the rear wheels of the dolly raised and sh pushed it in the door
then lifted the rear wheels and rolled it into place. Installed the
legs and tilted it and put it in place. SHE WOULD NOT LET ME HELP!!!
I was shocked !!! I think the key is a good dolly with 5 to 6 inch
wheels and to have the piano firmly strapped to it.
Good luck and I hope you enjoy your new baby.
Bruce May
|
58.936 | It's pretty easy w/ the right equipment | FRNTES::BACKES | | Fri Sep 20 1991 14:53 | 48 |
| I used to move pianos when I worked in technical theatre and
"roadied" concerts and stuff.
Get a piano board. This is a heavy plank about 8' long and 1.5' wide.
It is padded and had a stop block at one end. It has a strap that goes
from one end, over the piano and into a takeup ratchet type wheel at
the other end. Get a piano dolley, small thing about 3'x 2' with heavy
duty casters on it.
Place the piano board on the floor next to the not-curved side of the
piano, with the stop block near the keyboard. Remove the pedals off the
instrument. Make sure the top is held closed with a pin or if there
is no latch, tie it closed.
Hold up the piano near the keyboard, close to the piano board. Remove
that leg. Tip the piano down so that that corner rests on the piano
board. Carefully (so as not to break the other legs off) tip the rest
of the piano up so that it setting on it's "flat" side with the curved
side up, on the piano board. Slide it up against the stop. Remove the
other 2 legs. Cover piano with moving pad. put the strap over the top
from one end to the other and crank it down.
Tip up one end of the piano board (the end farthest from the keyboard)
and put the dolly under it. Set piano board down so that it balances on
the dolly and wheel it away.
Drink one (1) beer.
At the destination, reverse procedure (except for the beer, that is).
This is best done with three adults with no back problems, you can get
by with two people in a pinch (the union always sent at least 3 people
for a concert grand).
Rent a Uhaul with a ramp so that you can wheel it onto the truck right
out the front door. Take it off the dolly in the truck and secure it
tightly to the tie downs in the wall of the truck.
It's not that tough. Take your time and remember that no instrument is
worth hurting anybody over. If it starts to go, get out of the way. Pianos
are very heavy. Be careful!
Don't worry about fastening down the action. We routinly moved pianos in
the morning, had them tuned before the sound check, touched up again
before the show, and had rich and famous performer do a concert with
no complaints. Some acts travel with their own piano, and move it
exactly as above day in and day out.
|
58.937 | All systems GO for Sunday Move! | CARWSH::MURRAY | | Fri Sep 20 1991 17:23 | 10 |
| Sheesh! This is great! all this info and most of it jives pretty well!
We're gonna be doing this on Sunday afternoon, so, if I live thru it, I'll be
reporting back on Mon. or Tues. from my hospital bed 8^)
Thank all of you for the help. The good karma itself is almost enuf to lift
the thing!
Regards,
Rich Murray
|
58.938 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Sep 24 1991 08:39 | 8 |
| Your unbridled entusiasm prompts me to interject a story of the
time I was moving a small upright in the back of my pickup truck.
I turned left (slowly, I thought) at a corner, and heard a tremendous
KA_WHANG!!!!!! come from the back of the truck. The piano had fallen
over on its side; fortunately, it did not fall out of the truck,
else I would have been sitting there with a piano in the middle
of the intersection of 117 and 62 in Stow. Fortunately, also, this
was a "take it away for $10" piano.... Don't worry - you'll do great!
|
58.939 | The baby has arrived!! | CARWSH::MURRAY | | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:33 | 39 |
| Well, We done it!!!!!!
...and lived to tell the story.
I think the main thing to keep in mind when doing this is in spite of the
tendency to move quickly because of the incredible weight of the beast,
you've just got to go slowly and try to minimize the distance to the
truck.
We took off the lid, lyre, and legs following the advice above. I
wanted to secure it to the piano board but my two co-workers convinced
me that it would unduly complicate things even though it hurt to have
spent the $$$ to rent this unusual construction and then not use it.
After experiencing the Incredible Bulk of the piano during the loading
process, it didn't take much for me to realize that, if I could, I would
like to back the truck _through_ the front of my house just so we could
roll it down the ramp directly into the living room. As it was, I backed
the truck over the lawn as close to and in line with the front door as
possible.
Most of the moving was done with the piano on its long side on a
cushioned dolly. When we went up or down the few single steps here or
there, we _slowly_ tilted the piano back onto its rounded back and
re-positioned the dolly and ourselves. We used moving blankets to
prevent the piano from direct contact with the pavement, floors, etc.
All in all, a memorable experience but one I do not care to repeat
anytime soon. Of course, the ends justify the means and we now have
a fully functional (if slightly out of tune) baby grand thanks to good
ol' American DIY!!!
The total cost in rentals (i.e. Truck, dolly, cushions, piano board) was
$72 plus future heavy moving favors to my buddies.
Thank You All and stay tuned for notes begging for piano repair/restoration
advice 8^).
Rich Murray
|
58.971 | Well / pump air trouble HELP | BTOVT::LAWYER_D | | Wed Nov 20 1991 15:08 | 32 |
|
I had a shallow well put in at my home weeks ago,where I live it's
wet clay soil because I'm near a lake. The person that did my well
estimated in his words that he could do the job for 800 bucks not
counting a pump. When it was all said and done he told me that not
counting his bulldozer time the bill was 1,300 bucks but was willing
to settle for 1,200 bucks, the way he left my land is not pretty
because he said it's to wet and din't want to get his dozer stuck.
I've paid him 700 bucks so far and told him I thought 1,000 was fair
for the job because of the mess left ect. He will not settle for that
so we will settle it in court.
I first hooked up my mothers 1/2 hp groundfos pump with a hollow noncaptive
air tank and it worked fine (no air problems) untill I got my 1/2
hourse pump and tank from sears and hooked that up,now I'm getting
air problems,it started with just a burp once and a while, but now
it's real bad lots of air comming from somewhere. My line is one
pice to the well about 275 ft with one joint under the groung about
two feet that does not leak located just befor my pump. The only
thing I can think of is that the seal went bad in my new pump or
maybe the clamps are lose on my foot valve at the bottom of the well.
Also do the cement tiles have to be sealed ? if so do they make
anything to seal from the inside of the well because I'm planing on
trying to pump the well dry to check the clamps on the foot valve
this weekend and would like to seal the tiles if I can.
Thanks in advance,
Dave
like to seal them if I can
|
58.972 | what do you have in writing? | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Wed Nov 20 1991 17:58 | 16 |
| What do you have in writing? I would expect that when I am given a flat
estimate for a job that it includes everything necessary to get the job
done *or* I will be told that the extras are not included!
If you don't have it in writing, just pay the man the $100 balance
that you agreed upon. Do not pay a penny more as that is an admission
that you feel some obligation to pay more.
I don't see where the contractor has a leg to stand on unless you
agreed to pay extra for the dozer in writing or *at least* verbally!
Standard Disclaimer: this is not expert advice, it is free
and worth it.
mark
|
58.973 | suspect the air tank | GIAMEM::JELENIEWSKI | | Fri Nov 22 1991 11:22 | 15 |
| I'd look at the air tank. I have a shallow well also. My experience
has been that if the intake line leaks, the pump will drop the prime
and you won't get any water at all once the tank pressure is gone.
Don't seal the well tiles with anything. Just make sure the cap fits
securely. The way the well gets its water is from (my words) hydro-
static pressure, meaning that the saturated earth around the well
leaches water into the hollow area that is now the well. In gets in
there from the small cracks etc in the joints of the well tiles as
well as the base of the well.
I would spring for the $$$ and put in a bladder type air tank. The
non-bladder ones are a pain because they get air bound and then
spit air into the faucets etc.
|
58.974 | still lots and lots of air | BTOVT::LAWYER_D | | Mon Nov 25 1991 10:11 | 39 |
|
Thanks for the info on the well tiles. I do have a blatter tank I
bought the system from sears 1/2 hp and 20 gallon tank for a good
price,less then half of what it would cost for a goulds system.
My only problem is lots of air comeing from somewhere,I dug up the
line this weekend where I only have one connection about two feet
or so from the pump and there is no leaks, the rest is one pice
all the way to the well. the only thing I got left to try is make
the suction line a little smaller with no elbow's. It's set up like
this maybe this is why I'm getting so much air.
pump
___-----_____ 2" elbow 4" off pump
---_____--- |
| |
| |
| | singel water line
to pump 2"
Maybe if I use a smaller water line (1") from the pump to the 2" water
line with out any elbow's it would take care of the sucking air
problem. My Mothers groundfos pump worked just fine, it was set up
with a 1"line on the suction and discharge side of pump.I had the 1"
suction side line about 5' long befor hooking in my 2" water line.
no air problems but was not useing a blatter tank either
|
58.975 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Nov 25 1991 13:14 | 1 |
| There may be a crack in the pipe somewhere.
|
58.976 | sound like air??? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Nov 26 1991 12:01 | 11 |
|
I think you may find that somewhere along the line, your drawing air.
If there was air in the line to start with, you'd have a good chance
of loosing your prime. If i'm correct, the rule of thumb is some-
what like 0-100' is 1" pipe. 100 - 150 is 1.5", Then from 150
to 250' its 2" pipe. Something like that...... Two small a pipe
will cause the pump to work harder. If its to large, I dont
think you'd get it to prine correctly. You might to check the
pump housing for a bad seal?????
JD
|
58.977 | more air !!!! | BTOVT::LAWYER_D | | Wed Nov 27 1991 08:12 | 8 |
|
I beleve it's a 1 1/2" line they used, the cover to my well is not
on all the way, would this cause the system to suck in any air ?
very possible it could be a bad pump seal, if so will the pump leak?
Dave
|
58.978 | Where's that hand pump??? | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Dec 05 1991 07:47 | 11 |
| Dave,
If its a seal, I would suspect you'd see anything from a few drips
(look for traces of water) to major water loss. But seeing your
not loosing a prime, i'd speculate and say when the pump comes on,
it sucks the seal in somewhat, thus the air. Baring the fact that
none of your connections are leaking.
The cap shouldnt make any difference.
JD
|
58.979 | Some more air sources | ROYALT::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Sat Jan 11 1992 09:54 | 39 |
| I have a shallow well with a Goulds pump and captive air bladder tank.
45 feet of 1.25 inch pipe with a lift of about 18 feet.
I've been through several "air in the pipes" episodes and there are really
three causes that I'm now aware of:
1) A leak in the suction line, which has been discussed at length
here. The only other note I have in that respect is that a
suction line leak will leak water when the pump is not running,
except at a very slow rate. Suspect all joints. I use two
band clamps on every joint just to be sure. Also, you say you
have 250' of pipe-- is that all one piece??
2) Dissolved gasses in the water. This is normal, and some gasses
will be extracted simply by the suction. One of these is radon.
In my pump, this produces a small amount of air.
3) A clogged jet. Inside your pump housing (or attached to it)
is what is called a jet, or venturi. This unit allows a
cetrifugical pump to work without "cavitating". If this gets
clogged, you will end up extracting ALL the gas from the water
and your pump will not function.
There are probably more, and I'll probably find them over the next years. :-}
To see if you are sucking a significant amount of air, run a hose into
a bucket full of water. If you see lots of bubbles when the pump runs, you've
probably got an air leak. If you see just a few tiny bubbles, they are
probably from dissolved gasses.
I don't know if the pipe size has anything to do with suction except making
the pump work harder with smaller sizes. However, 250' of 2" pipe is quite
a bit of water to get moving! You might want to consider a two-pipe system
that locates the jet in the well. You also mention that the Grundfos pump
works fine... is it very different from the Sears pump or is it hooked up
differently?
Good luck!
--tom
|
58.352 | Well Water _Quantity_ Tests? | CYCLST::DEBRIAE | Five Miles Out, just keep your heading true... | Mon Jan 27 1992 13:33 | 25 |
|
Is it customary to do a well water _quantity_ test when one is buying
an established home from someone with a drilled well? I read notes here
about water quality tests, but saw no mention about _quantity_ tests.
Is it necessary, a good idea, unnecessary, or something ridiculous to
worry about?
The usual water quantity test involves running a faucet for four hours
with a water meter attached to it. Is this something you can do
yourself? Say like running the faucets on both bathtubs and the kitchen
faucet of two hours or so and seeing if the well runs dry? Would this
be an accurate measure to judge the amount of water in the well
throughout the year?
I have no idea when or if the water pump was serviced, no idea how deep
the well is, how much water it was made to have in the reserve, etc. I
only know that the well itself is less than 25 years old. What is the
lifespan of a well, is there any maintenance required on these things,
or is it something stuck in the ground that one never has to worry
about for decades?
What are your thoughts on this...
-Erik
|
58.353 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jan 27 1992 15:30 | 3 |
| Easier way (maybe): find out who drilled the well, call them up, and
ask. They probably measured the flow rate after they drilled the well
and may still have a record of it.
|
58.354 | | MANTHN::EDD | Press END or pay! {argh} | Mon Jan 27 1992 16:34 | 7 |
| When I bought my house in '83 the bank required a quantity test. The
previous owner had kept the certificate from when the well was drilled
in '66, and I just gave the bank a photo-copy.
...I shudder at the thought of them NOT accepting it.
Edd
|
58.355 | I'd do it myself unless I suspected trouble | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Mon Jan 27 1992 16:43 | 5 |
| I paid for a quantity test, and my bank didn't even require it. Next
time, I think I'll run the garden hose full on for 4 hours.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
58.356 | Year ago but I believe I had to | WMOIS::BRENNAN_P | | Mon Jan 27 1992 17:01 | 15 |
| I bought my house with well water last year. I don't remember why
now but I was under the impression that my loan depended on the
water passing a qulity and quantity test. The quantity test did
up the price quite a bit. Again I don't remember but I think it was
arount $100. All that cost was related to the fact that they do
just about what you said. Hook a hose up to the water tank and run
it through a meter. I needed 4 hours at some rate or some total
volume which ever came first. I expect you will find the price
changes from place to place. It seemed to me the inspector (I had
the same inspector look at the house test the water, check for radon)
was willing to lose money in one place to make money elsewhere.
hope it all helps
Paul
|
58.357 | sorry about the whatevers | CSC32::S_MAUFE | hottub and chains weather | Mon Jan 27 1992 18:19 | 9 |
|
we had to get the quantity tested for the loan, as well as piece of
mind.
Orginally it was 16 whatevers. Now it is down to about 6
whatevers(gals/min). The folks in town on the main supply get 8
whatevers, so I figure 6 is OK with a 20 gallon holding tank.
Simon
|
58.358 | Don't run the water into your septic system. | BADDAY::SCHWARTZ | | Thu Jan 30 1992 07:24 | 8 |
|
Running all that water into the faucets and tubs for that length of
time certainly would be a good test of the septic tank if nothing
else. I am assuming that most hoses with wells also have septic tanks.
You could end up with a saturated leech field. Better to do it outside
with the old garden hose.
After 4 hrs you should then know that your fill rate in the well
exceeds normal expected usage.
|
58.359 | | MVCAD3::DEHAHN | ninety eight don't be late | Thu Jan 30 1992 08:51 | 7 |
|
You don't need to test it for four hours. For example, if the well spec
for your lender is 5 gal/min/4hrs then if your well will pump 10
gal/min/2hrs you have moved the same volume of water. You are testing
the reserve and the well recovery.
CdH
|
58.360 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Jan 30 1992 12:04 | 10 |
| Re:.7
Hummmmmm....When I had a well test for a house (didn't buy it),
the water test person had to leave it going for 4 hours. I know
that your math is correct....but....don't you want/need the
test to go for four hours independent of the volume pumped?
That was my experinece, anyway.
Marc H.
|
58.361 | | MVCAD3::DEHAHN | ninety eight don't be late | Thu Jan 30 1992 12:53 | 13 |
|
My experience was as I stated, the requirement was xgal/min-4hrs. This
equates to a total volume over xtime. There was no absolute time
requirement. I checked with my lender and that was fine with them.
Since I don't have a pool to fill or a fire to put out, the ability to
run the well flat out for four hours wasn't a concern. What was a
concern was the size of the reserve and the recovery. We live on a hill
full of ledge with no lack of water, today 8^) Now I'll go home to a
well run dry...8^)
CdH
|
58.723 | leaky holding tank | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Mon Jun 01 1992 12:30 | 23 |
| Help! I have a leak in my holding/pressure tank.
The other day when walking by my (shallow well) pump house I heard
water spraying. When I checked it out I found a pinhole leak in the
tank. I would estimate that the flow through this leak is on the order
of 1 gallon per hour.
What is a reasonable way to fix this? Can I apply some epoxy and
expect it to hold?
Should I get the tank spot welded? Cost? Will I just have other
leaks forming because the tank is so old? ( Could be near 30 years
old.)
I don't really want to replace this tank if I can do a quick
temporary fix because I plan to decommission this well this summer when
we drill a new well. I hope to make the new well a deep well so I don't
know if I can re-use this equipment.
thanks in advance for advice,
Mark
|
58.724 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Mon Jun 01 1992 12:55 | 20 |
| I think you should be able to re-use a new tank with your new well.
A pump company ought to be able to tell you for sure, but I don't
see why not. The pressure tank ought to be independent of the
kind of pump/well you have.
If you want to save the hassle of putting in a new tank only to
take it out so you can re-use it, you might try:
Drill a small hole at the point of the leak tap drill size for a #4-40
thread, or thereabouts; the finer the thread the better, as you may not
have much material left in the tank wall. Tap the hole #4-40. Goop
up a #4-40 machine screw with silicone and screw it in as a plug.
(n.b. tap drill for a #4-40 screw is a #43 drill.)
Epoxy might work; use coarse sandpaper or something to shine up the
outside of the tank and get the grime of ages off where the epoxy
is supposed to stick. Certainly an easy thing to try, although you'll
have to leave the tank unpressurized while the epoxy hardens, of
course.
|
58.725 | its time! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon Jun 01 1992 13:27 | 7 |
|
A screw with a rubber washer works sometimes. But it might
be the coldest day when it lets go...... So maybe it would be
a good time to check the sale papers..... I think I got my 30gal
on sale for $130 something...
JD
|
58.726 | Pump Problem | NEST::TGRILLO | | Thu Jun 11 1992 14:31 | 14 |
| My pump works fine every Winter,but as soon as Summer roles around
the thing goes crazy. Sometimes it turns on and doesn't shut off
until I go to the celler and manually press the relay switch.
Sometimes it just turns on & off every second until I go down and
shut it up. I usually adjust the 2 screws on the relay that makes
it turn off and on whenever the seasons change,and it takes care of
it,but this year it just won't work. I had it looked at 2 years ago
and the guy said I needed a whole new system. I figured he was just
a money grubbing jerk and blew him off. I think its just a bad relay
but why would it work fine all Winter and then act up when the seasons
change ? I'm going to bring in another pro for a second opinion,but
before I do I was wondering if anyone here can help me.
Thanks
|
58.727 | | MANTHN::EDD | Turn 4 (Bang) Turn 4 (Bang) | Thu Jun 11 1992 17:11 | 10 |
| The pump is actuated by a pressure switch. When the pressure reaches
the upper limit the pump shuts off. Draw water and the pressure drops
to the lower limit and the pump turns on.
If you've been adjusting the two screws could you have bonkered the
pressure settings?
At any rate, the switch is about $15 and is a pretty simple fix...
Edd
|
58.728 | Worked for me | MSEE::TOWLE | Corky | Fri Jun 12 1992 09:44 | 11 |
| RE: .49
Might be moisture, (humidity sweat) getting into the contact points on the
pressure switch relay causing the circuit to close and the pump to go spastic.
I had the same problem once until I started using silicon spray to keep the
water off the relay contact points.
An additional step I take in the summer is to remove the cover on the
pressure switch which now doesn't leave anyplace for moisture to condense and
drip onto the contacts.
|
58.729 | pressure not holding ? | NEST::TGRILLO | | Fri Jun 12 1992 10:36 | 15 |
| RE.51
I think your right about the moisture because it gets very damp &
musty down there because the house is built on ledge and alot of
moisture seeps in when summer comes. In the winter the bioler is
running alot more and keeps it dryer. I do leave the cap off,but I
haven't tried the silicon spray though. There is another symptom that
I forgot to mention in my original note. The problem accures when the
pump is trying to shut off. The pressure builds up after I shut the
water off and lifts the springs and trigers the relay to shut off the
pump. The second the pump shuts off,the pressure drops a little and
the pump turns back on,then off/on/off/on etc... The pressure isn't
holding. That seems to be the main problem. I've read some notes
here having to do with the tank being "waterlogged". Could this
have something to do with the pressure not holding ? It doesn't
drop that much,just enough trigger the relay on and off.
|
58.730 | Switch not set right ?? | MSEE::TOWLE | Corky | Fri Jun 12 1992 11:51 | 27 |
| RE: .52
You might have the settings on the pressure switch set wrong. If there is
not enough differential between the cut out and cut in pressures the pressure
switch will "bounce" like you are describing. They aren't all that accurate
so you need to have at least a ten to twenty pound difference between cut out
(shut off pressure) and cut in (turn on pressure).
I can't exactly remember which screw is which but if I remember right, the
big nut is cut off and the little nut is cut in.
Try setting the big screw for a 40 pound cut out (turn off) and the little
screw, the differential screw for a 20 or 30 pound cut in (turn on).
You may have to play with it a bit before you get it right but I think once
you have the differential set correctly your problems will go away.
While you're in there you might want to check the points for crud or damage
from arcing. If they are pitted or worn, replace the switch then follow the
directions that come with the new switch to set the pressure and
differential settings.
I run mine at 40 pound cut in and 60 pound cut out.
Waterlogging might be part of it too so you might want to drain the tank,
reset your air supply then refill.
|
58.731 | draining tank ? | NEST::TGRILLO | | Fri Jun 12 1992 12:17 | 15 |
| I fiddled with the settings for hours trying to come up with the right
one,but nothing seems to work. I've been succesfull at it for the last
few years,but this time its got me. I think I'll try draining the tank
as suggested. I'm not sure how to do it though. From reading previous
notes I think I have a good idea on how to drain it and set the
pressure,but I don't understand how to finish the job. I'll explain
how far I think I can get,and hopefully someone can tell me anything
else I need to know.
1. Shut off power to pump - 2.Turn water on at faucet and run until
water stops - 3. open spicket on tank and drain until water stops.
4. close spicket and put air in tank with bicycle pump (psi ?)
(This is where I get shakey) Do I just shut off the faucet and turn
the power back on ? Any input will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
|
58.732 | | MANTHN::EDD | Turn 4 (Bang) Turn 4 (Bang) | Fri Jun 12 1992 13:23 | 6 |
| My tank pre-charge was in the area of 15-20 PSI. It should obviously
be *below* the cut on point.
The rest of your procedure was correct...
Edd
|
58.733 | | SOLVIT::TOMMYB::BERKNER | Wonderful person. | Fri Jun 12 1992 13:35 | 14 |
| The continual on off may be a combination of things; perhaps you have too small
difference between on and off pressures, a waterlogged tank which causes large
change in pressures by moving small amounts of water, and a leaky check valve
which allow small quantities of water to go backward through the pump and into
the well.
I would propose that you get a reasonable pressure gauge (might already be on
your tank or control), drain the tank and inject air. Turn everything on and
let the pressure build up. Close the valve that permits water from your tank
enter the house plumbing. Check the pressure gauge over a period of an hour
or two. If the pressure drops, you probably have a leaky check valve - replace
it.
Tom
|
58.734 | | ESOA11::GRILLOJ | John Grillo @ Decus | Fri Jun 12 1992 15:09 | 2 |
| Why don't you just ask your "retired old man" to lend you the money and
buy you a new unit. :-)
|
58.735 | | HIHOSS::HOSSFELD | I'm so confused! | Tue Jun 23 1992 12:06 | 5 |
| Also make sure the tube that the switch is mounted on
is clear. If that gets clogged (with sediment/iron/sludge)
that results are strange.
Paul H.
|
58.524 | SEDIMENT PROBLEM | BRAT::RACZKOWSKI | | Tue Jul 07 1992 23:25 | 40 |
| I posted this as a reply in note 58 and didn't get any response so I'll
try it again under this note. Didn't want to start another topic on
wells.
The problem - sediment filter gets filled with sand/sediment and water
pressure drops to near zero.
Background - I put down 25 strips of sod recently (3 weeks ago) and
used my lawn sprinkler to water the sod. Shortly after I turned on the
sprinkler, my son took a shower and my wife did a load of wash. About
an hour or so after this I noticed the water pressure was down to a
trickle. When I checked the filter, it was filled with sediment. I
changed the filter and pressure returned to normal. I called local
well driller and he said I probably drew the water level below where
the casing goes into the granite, causing external water pressure to
force sediment into the water column. He thought it would settle down
after a few days. If not, he suggested I have the pump raised about
20 feet.
Well, about a week later, the filter was filled up with sand again.
I'm not aware of any heavy usage of water (we've been careful not to
use too much water at one time) so I'm not sure what the problem is.
It has not happened since the second time and I do water the sod every
other day, but by hand.
Can anyone offer any suggestions? I've read the notes about
hydro-fracking but I'm not sure if the problem is GPM or the pump
too close to the bottom. I don't have any details on the well and the
driller (Christian of Derry, NH) is no longer in business. I seem to
recall the builder saying the well goes down about 375'. I know when
we moved in water was constantly coming out from the top and we were
told they hit an artesian well.
Any comments or suggestions appreciated. Also, any comments on Skilling
Well of Hollis would be appreciated.
Also noticed today that we had water coming out the top of the well so
it appears there's plenty of water.
Thanks, Mary
|
58.525 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Wed Jul 08 1992 08:58 | 16 |
| All I can tell you is that my well is 240' deep and the pump people
put the pump at a depth of 200', leaving 40' for sediment buildup.
Presumably, the people who put the pump in your well were equally
intelligent...though I guess you never know.
You know, if you don't get an answer to a note, it may be because
nobody has one. In this case, I don't think there is an answer
that anybody can give you because there is no telling just what
the problem is without some more investigation. If the problem
persists, you'll probably have to get somebody in to pull the pump
and check out the well to see if they can find anything. The well
casing may be cracked.
In any case, you probably ought to get your water tested. If
(apparently) surface water and sediment can get into the well
that easily, the well may be contaminated.
|
58.526 | | TOLKIN::GUERRA | Victory never comes without a struggle | Wed Jul 08 1992 13:10 | 15 |
| I just went through this while attempting to sell our house in Charlton, Mass.
There is a requirement of 5 gals. per minute for four hours and our well was not
producing that. The buyers are willing to take it if it reaches 3.5 gals. per
minute so we decided to hydrofract the well. When the well company tried to
lower the equimpment into the well, they found it was not going through so they
lowered a camera with a light. They found that the casing was not down to the
ledge, thus exposing 16 inches of soil. This, they say, was causing the sediment
problem we have had in our house for 7 years. Our filters last about 3 months.
That and another problem with the well and the casing not being aligned were
fixed and the procedure was done. We still have to see if positioning the casing
properly really reduces the sediment problem.
About hydrofracting, the well went from producing about 2.5 gals per minute for
four hours to 3.5 per minute for three hours. That seems about average for the
area. Not much of an improvement and there were no guarantees.
|
58.362 | adding fluoride to well water | CSC32::S_MAUFE | okay, I'll take an IBM compatible | Mon Jul 20 1992 14:14 | 7 |
|
I didn't see any existing notes on this,....
Are there such things as flouride water treatment for a home? I have
well water, which I'd like to add flouride to.
thanx ! Simon
|
58.363 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:53 | 5 |
| Not that I've ever heard of - metering flouride for water is a precise
business. If you're concerned about teeth, ask your doctor for a prescription
for flouride rinses and supplements.
Steve
|
58.364 | | SENDAK::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Tue Jul 21 1992 10:08 | 5 |
| Have you had your well water tested for flouride? You may already
have natural flouride. In some areas (Princeton, Mass., is one I
think) there is quite a bit of natural flouride in the water.
Otherwise, see .1; get flouride tablets, or rinses, or whatever.
|
58.365 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jul 21 1992 12:33 | 1 |
| Aargh! It's fluoride, not flouride.
|
58.366 | Adults/Children fluoride req | LANDO::OBRIEN | Give it a TRI | Thu Jul 30 1992 14:45 | 10 |
| .2 is right. I had the same concern, so asked my brother-in-law(who
also happens to be our dentist). He said that normally, there is
plenty of fluoride in well water for adults. Adults don't require
nearly as much as children. If you're concern is because you have
children, their pediatrician should be prescribing vitamins that
contain the floride.
regards,
-John
|
58.980 | Advice, I think I'm being taken advantage of on well service ! | RANGER::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Mon Aug 17 1992 08:29 | 46 |
|
Does anyone have any comments on this ?
I woke up the other day and there was no water in the house. We have
an artesian well. I called a local company and they showed up at the house
at about 9:00am. My well is 40' deep and they were able to pull the pump out
by hand. The pump was bad. The pump that was in the well was a 1hp which was
an overkill and was replaced with a 3/4 Aermotor brand. The control panel cover
was also switched from a 1hp to a 3/4 panel. I got a call the next night from
the well company who spoke to my wife and told her the bill was in the mail
and it was $900 dollars. I freaked out and plan some action today. I tried
calling other pump companies but all were closed. I looked in the Sears catalog
to get an idea how much a pump and control panel costs. The Sears pump was
listed at $339 and the control panel at $89. If the parts are somewhat close
then it seems they charged me about over $200 per hour for only 2 hours work.
I'm going to be calling around today to get prices from other companies and
I'm sure that I will find that I'm getting screwed ! The whole time they were
at my house they kept saying, "Boy, what a nice place you have". That should
have tipped me off ! They took my old control panel and pump and said that they
just throw the pump in the trash. When I call around today I'm going to be
asking the following questions.
. How much for a 3/4 pump
. How much for a 3/4 control panel
. How much per hour labor
. How much would they estimate my job should cost
. Is there a rebate on the core and panel and do they
rebuild pumps
. Find out suggested retail price of that model pump
My questions to you people are this. I know this can't be right and
I plan to fight it. There was nothing agreed on up front. I have not got the
bill yet but expect it today and will post everything.
What rights do I have as a consumer ? I'm sure that I will find that
everyone I talk to is much lower and he was just pricing everything based on
what he thought I could pay. After I get quotes on the pump and and other
companies, I plan to approach him with the facts and tell him what he should
get. I plan, to take this to court if need be and if I have a leg to stand on.
So, what do ya think ?
-Steve-
|
58.981 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Aug 17 1992 08:44 | 4 |
| Steve, what did you tell them when you called? Also, is your well 40
feet deep? Sounds like a dug well, not Artesian.
Marc H.
|
58.982 | | RANGER::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Mon Aug 17 1992 09:20 | 18 |
|
Yes it is an atesian well. The first one was 700 feet but only produced
5 gallons a minute so the bank made them drill another one. At 40 feet they hit
an underground river which produced over 15 gallons a minute ! I filled my 20X40
swimming pool non stop with it !!!
I just got off the phone with a bunch of other well contractors. They
all came in at around the same price. The pump costs about $710 dollars. Sears
was not a good example I guess !
After I talked to these other companies they all asked who did it. When
I told them they all said he was very good and reputable !
I guess the case is closed and I'll pay the $900.
-Steve-
|
58.983 | | MANTHN::EDD | Nimis capsicum | Mon Aug 17 1992 09:32 | 15 |
| Since Steve's problem is solved, can I rat-hole this?
What's the advantage of having the pump in the well? I've got an
artesian well, but the pump is located in the cellar. It's broke
twice in 9 years, and each time cost me about 2 hours of labor and
<$100.
I also find it real handy as a "low pressure" monitor. If the pump
goes on in the middle of the night, I'll hear it and know that
something is dripping/leaking. Or when my tank lost it's precharge,
it was the cycling of the pump that clued me in to the problem.
What's the advantage of a submersed pump?
Edd
|
58.984 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Aug 17 1992 10:01 | 8 |
| If you have a straight pump...30 feet is the limit that you can raise
water( I think). In order to pump a higher amount, you need to have
either the pump in the water, or have a venturri arangement, with the
venturri in the well, and the pump in the house.
Any well experts out there?
Marc H.
|
58.985 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Mon Aug 17 1992 10:11 | 11 |
| Yeah, you can put the pump for a deep well in the cellar, but it has
to have a return line going back down the well so you have two pipes
to the well. My uncle has this arrangement. It's been operating
(with occasional repairs) for over 30 years. Nothing particularly
wrong with it.
I'm sure the pump down the well is more efficient though. It's a
heck of a lot easier to push water than it is to pull it. It may
also be more reliable. There's only one pipe to leak, instead of
two.
|
58.986 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Mon Aug 17 1992 12:34 | 12 |
| A "shallow well" pump can be located in the basement, has one pipe from the
well, and is only good for pumping water about 25' or so (theoretical max
is 32' I think)
A "jet" pump can be located in the basement, has 2 lines to the well, and
can pump deeper than a shallow well pump (I forget how much, about 100' I
think) The pump itself is the same design as a shallow well pump in many
cases and is fairly inexpensive.
Deeper than that you need a pump in the well.
-Mike
|
58.987 | Hint...hint | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Missing Car #3,Call 1-800-LAP DOWN | Mon Aug 17 1992 13:08 | 13 |
| My insurance co. bought me a new jet pump 10 years ago and it was
~$700 for a Gould pump, controller and surge protector. We had many
lightning strikes and I quess they traveled thru the aquafier to my
pump. It was fried inside, even having a surge protector hooked to the
controller. I guess it didn't protect it when it got hit from
the opposite end. They even waved my $100 deductable because I dug up
the well head and removed/reinstalled the pump myself.
Jim
re.0 was your pump fried by "underground lightning"....? Could save you
a few bucks. A electrician friend mentioned about the lightening and
the insurance co. said...OK!
|
58.988 | Submersible pumps for DEEP wells | GLDDST::HURST_JO | "John D. Hurst, DTN 549-5924" | Mon Aug 17 1992 20:48 | 10 |
| Where I from, California, many wells are in excess of 100'. As previously
mentioned, there is a maximum distance which water may be drawn up. Thirty
feet sounds about right. The well on our ranch was about 165 feet deep and
the best/most-efficient was to get water was with a submersible pump. There
are various advantages to submeribles depending on where you live. Shallow
wells can get by without one. A pump company can contrast the differences
quite well. My father used to work for one.
Regards,
John
|
58.367 | ARSENIC IN DRINKING WATER | BUOVAX::BRYANT | | Fri Nov 06 1992 12:50 | 15 |
| Hi,
I'm in the process of buying a house and had the well water tested
for basic potablity and the presence of arsenic.
Potability was fine but arsenic was high - it was under the EPA
recommended maximum but it was close to the maximum.
Does anyone know if there is a way to filter arsenic from water?
Or if there is some kind of treatment available...I'd just as soon not
have to drill a new well.
Thanks,
Priscilla
|
58.368 | Distiller or Reverse Osmosis Filter needed | TNPUBS::WASIEJKO | Retired CPO | Mon Nov 09 1992 14:40 | 23 |
| You can remove arsenic by installing a distiller or a Reverse-Osmosis
filter for the drinking water. You don't need to filter outside taps
or bathroom plumbing, unless you're having a mineral buildup problem.
Of course, you can install the filtering at the wellhead, but the higher
volume of water drawn through the filter (as opposed to drinking water
only) requires changing the membrane (element) in the filter more
often. A clogged filter can be more dangerous than no filter at all,
when you consider the concentration of contaminants trapped in the
element through which your drinking water must pass.
Durastill offers a line of home water distillers. I have owned one
since 1985. It provides me with a separate tap at the kitchen sink and
is also connected to the icemaker/tap on the my fridge.
Culligan offers reverse-osmosis and charcoal filtering.
The distiller removes more arsenic from the water than the filtering.
Good luck.
-mike-
|
58.867 | Help for an overactive shallow well pump? | NOVA::DAVISON | Jay Davison, Database Systems | Tue Dec 01 1992 08:41 | 35 |
| I have a slightly different, but related problem/question to
those mentioned earlier in this note. Perhaps someone can shed
some light on this for me.
I bought a house earlier this year that has a shallow well with a
jet pump and a holding tank.
My problem is that the pump seems to cycle too frequently. What I mean
is that it kicks on and off about 4 times just to fill up the toilet
water tank after the toilet is flushed. I'd guess it kicks on each
time about � to 1 gallon of water is drawn from the holding tank.
That seems too frequent too me, but I've never had a well before,
so I'm not sure what to expect.
The pressure gauge on the holding tank appears to be working OK.
The pump comes on at about 30 lb. and shuts off at 50 lb.
It only takes about 5 seconds for it go from 30 to 50.
Also, when I depress the valve in the pressure gauge on the holding
tank, water comes squirting out (it doesn't just trickle out, it's
under some pressure and squirts out with force). The pressure gauge
is about � way up the holding tank.
I'd guess that I have too much water in the holding tank, so that
the water to air ratio is incorrect in the holding tank. I don't think
that water should be coming out of the pressure valve when it's
depressed. I tried turning off the power to the pump and draining off
about 6 gallons of water (so that no more water came out of the
pressure gauge), but the problem returned again. I didn't pump
any additional air into the tank when I did this - perhaps I should
have?
So, my question is:
Is this normal behavior for this type of pump setup? If not, then
can you suggest how I can correct the situation? Thanks in advance
for any assistance.
|
58.868 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Tue Dec 01 1992 09:58 | 13 |
| Yep - you've got the answer. You don't have enough air in the pressure
tank, so there isn't enough air to compress for a buffer. Sometimes
those pressure tanks have a bladder inside to separate the air from the
water - if you don't, the air gradually dissolves into the water so
the problem keeps recurring. If your tank don't have a bladder, or if the
bladder is punctured, the problem will keep coming back.
I guess I'd drain the whole tank, then start the pump up again and see
how things went. There may be a fitting on the tank - like on a tire -
so you can pump in air. I'm not sure of the details on just how to do
that (what pressure to go to, whether to do it with the tank empty, or
what).
|
58.869 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Tue Dec 01 1992 10:17 | 29 |
| I think the trick is to :
1.) Shut off the pump. Unplug or whatever.
2.) open a tap and let the water run until it stops.
3.) Add air to the pressure tank until the low limit (in this case 30
psi) is reached.
If you are at 30psi after step 2 you are either OK or very much not
OK. After step 2 the pressure tank should have little or no water in
it. The air bladder, if it has one, should have pushed all of the water
from the pressure tank.
If you determine that there is still water in the pressure tank you
either have a bladderless tank, or a bladder with a hole in it (ie: a
virtual bladderless tank.) You should consult your pressure tank manual
(you did save it didn't you?) for the correct procedure to replace the
bladder.
Bladderless tanks usually have a gyzmo on them that looks like a
clear plastic covered cup with a couple of ball valves in it. This is a
device to regulate the air in the tank on bladderless tanks. It is
supposed to replenish the air that dissolves into the water over time.
If you see something that looks like this it will also have a sensor
cable connecting it to the pump. If you do have a bladderless tank you
may want to replace this gyzmo. Sears carries them for a nominal
charge. I think they go for $10 to $20 or so.
|
58.870 | More info... | NOVA::DAVISON | Jay Davison, Database Systems | Tue Dec 01 1992 10:41 | 26 |
| Thanks for the input so far.
Re: .36, .37
I'm not sure, but I think I have a bladder in the tank. Of course,
the previous owner didn't leave me a manual for the tank, and it
never occurred to me to ask. There is a standard air pressure gauge
on the tank (the kind with a needle meter and a valve coming out of
it that looks like your basic threaded tire valve) - no ball valves
that I can recall.
As suggested, I have also tried to drain the entire holding tank. I
shut off the power to the pump and bled the whole tank from the spigot
at the bottom of the tank. When I did this, the pressure valve
indicated that there was 0 air pressure in the tank. Perhaps the
lack of air pressure at this point is the problem. Consequently, when
I reconnected the power, the tank filled up again to 50 lb, and the
water level once again rose above the pressure gauge on the tank.
So, nothing changed by doing this. I still have too much water
in the tank.
So, I take it from .37, that to correct the problem, I should:
drain the tank again, and then pump air into the tank via the air pressure
valve, until it rests at 30 lb (the low pressure limit) with no
water in the tank, and then allow the tank to refill?
Does that sound correct? Thanks again for all the help.
|
58.871 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Tue Dec 01 1992 10:53 | 23 |
| you've got it!
Yes, the air pressure fittings are exactly the same as on car and
bicycle tires. Due to the volume of air needed you may wnat to use an
electric air pump though.
BTW it is a good idea to check your turn-on and shut-off settings. You
mention the the pump turns on at 30 psi and off at 50psi. You want to
make sure that your pressure tank is matched to those settings or vice
versa. Thus with no water in the tank your should see 30psi and the
pump should be willing to turn on. When the pressure rises to 50 psi the
pump should turn off. If for some reason you needed to change these
pressure settings you would have to adjust not only the pressure tank
but the pump regulator (a little box with set screws) as well. Let's
save that for another note.
The reason for matching the lower setting is to allow the pressure
tank to push (near) all of the water from the tank, thus minimizing
pump cycles. Matching the higher level assures that the pump will not
try to push more water into the tank than it can hold.
good luck,
Mark
|
58.872 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Dec 01 1992 11:03 | 5 |
| RE: .39
Nice answer Mark.
Marc H.
|
58.873 | Are you draining the tank completely? | KOLFAX::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:26 | 14 |
| It sounds like you are "waterlogged" i.e. too much water not enough air.
As has been pointed out in previous replies you want to drain all the water
out of the tank before turning the pump back on. It sounds to me like you
so far have been unable to get all the water out of the tank. After you
drain all the water out of the tank (or so you think), starting at the top of
the tank, tap the tank with the hammer working you way down to the bottom of the
tank. If you are hitting in the airspace you'll hear a hollow ping, once you
reach the water it will sound more like a thud. It seems to me that your tank
is still half full when the water stops coming out of your spigot.
Are you draining your tank at the bottom of the tank, or up in your kitchen
sink?
|
58.874 | I think so... | NOVA::DAVISON | Jay Davison, Database Systems | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:38 | 12 |
| I'm pretty sure I got all the water out of the tank. I drained it
from the bottom of the holding tank - there's a spigot there from which
I ran a garden hose. I opened the spigot until nothing more
came out. I had shut off the valve going up from the tank (to the rest
of the house) prior to doing this.
As I said previously, after doing this, the tank pressure gauge
reads 0 lbs. pressure. When I restored power to the pump, the
tank seemed to become too full of water again. I guess I don't really
understand why draining the tank completely will fix this problem -
seems to me I really need to get more air into the bladder, as
suggested in the past replies. Now, if I just had an electric air pump...
|
58.875 | Try this. | XK120::SHURSKY | Is it spring, yet? | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:49 | 8 |
| If you shut off the valve to the rest of the house then I think you only
drained out enough to get rid of the excess pressure. The tank remained
full since no air was able to enter the tank. Try leaving the valve to
the rest of the system open AND opening one of your taps like in the
kitchen sink. This will allow air into the system and the water will
run out.
Stan
|
58.876 | An easier way??? | LUDWIG::CASSIDY | Aspiring conservationist | Wed Dec 02 1992 00:04 | 9 |
|
Pumping air into the air valve with the drain open would dis-
place the water. It should be easier than draining your pipes.
Opening (depressing) the stem on the air valve might let enough
air into the tank to allow the water to trickle out. Removing
the stem could make things easier. Do you have one of those
valve wrenches?
Tim
|
58.877 | More information and questions... | NOVA::DAVISON | Jay Davison, Database Systems | Wed Dec 02 1992 08:48 | 33 |
| OK, I fooled around last night and discovered that I hadn't gotten the
tank drained completely before. Here's what I tried this time:
- Turned off power to the pump.
- Opened bathtub faucet - only about � gallon of water came out (hmmm...)
Left spigot from tank to rest of house open.
- Opened spigot at bottom of tank. Let water drain until no more
came out. Hmmm, didn't seem like too much came out.
- Depressed valve stem on tank. I can hear bubbles gurgling out of water.
More water drains from spigot at bottom of tank now. So I continued
depressing valve stem and draining water until I can't hear
the water bubbles anymore. I'm not sure I drained the whole tank,
but I got pretty close (I was doing it via bucket, since my hose
was frozen, so it was a slow process).
- Now, the tank is mostly empty. The pressure gauge on the tank
read 2 lbs. I assume that I need to pump air back into the
tank bladder at this point (?). So (using my little foot pump)
I got 12 lbs. of air pressure into the tank (that's the best
I could do).
- When I restored power to the pump, it filled the tank again,
but I don't think the water level was as high. The pump is performing
much better. It kicks on only once per toilet flush, and runs for
a longer period of time when refilling (no more short � gallon bursts
like before). However, water still squirts out of the valve when I
depress it. Is that normal, or is that tank still too full of water?
So, things are better. But, I think that after draining the tank
as described above, I still need to put back the full 30 lbs. of air
pressure into the tank prior to allowing the pump to refill the tank.
Putting in 12 lbs. seemed to help quite a bit. If 30 lbs.
is supposed to be the normal low limit for the tank, is that what the
pressure gauge should read when the tank is completely empty?
Is this correct? Thanks once again for everyone's help on this.
|
58.878 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Wed Dec 02 1992 11:38 | 22 |
| You done good...so far.
You really want the full 30psi in the tank for things to work
right, however I am very concerned that you see water coming out of the
air valve at all. Does a lot of water squirt out or just a few drops as
if the valve itself was full of water?
In any event there should be very little water coming out of the
air valve. A small amount might form due to condensation of all that
air that you pumped in, but I really suspect that your air bladder
(assuming that you have one) is shot. You will need to replace either
the bladder of the whole tank for a permanent fix. FWIW I picked up a
pressure tank at Sears for around $100-150. A typical tank is in the
range of 40 to 70 gallons (?).
In any event, one toilet flushing should not always cause the pump
to cycle. This indicates that the pressure tank is only being tapped
for about five gallons between cycles instead of at least 40 gallons.
THis may be due to the low air charge, but I am still concerned about
your bladder. (try saying that last sentence in any other notesfile ;*)
BTW is your pressure tank a vertical or horizontal tank?
|
58.879 | It's more than a drip... | NOVA::DAVISON | Jay Davison, Database Systems | Wed Dec 02 1992 15:15 | 18 |
| Thanks.
I have a vertical tank. It's probably a Sears - the pump motor is.
I'm not sure what the capacity is - it looks like about 60 gallons.
The air valve is half-way up the tank. After draining the tank,
putting in 12 lbs air, and letting the pump refill the tank, the water
still squirts out of the valve with some force when it's depressed.
It's not condensation - I think I'm actually draining the tank via the
valve! I'm assuming that this means that the water level is higher
than the valve, which, if I read earlier notes correctly, does not
appear to be the correct air to water ratio for the tank.
My next step will be to drain the tank again, get an air compressor,
and try to fill the tank up to 30 lbs pressure, and then to refill
the tank. If the water still comes out of the valve at this point,
I'll assume that the bladder is not functioning correctly, and look
into getting a new tank. Any other suggestions? Thanks.
|
58.880 | Had this problem too. | AIAG::VALCARCE | 'n evryday the paperboy brings more. | Wed Dec 02 1992 16:00 | 24 |
| Hi, I'm not active in this notes file, but I happened to recognize this
problem. I've had to fix it twice now. Last time was about a month ago.
My pressure tank has the directions pasted on it, so you might take a look.
This is from memory, I'll try to remember to double check them.
1. Shut off the pump.
2. Drain the tank COMPLETELY from the bottom valve. I run a hose out the
basement door. If its not a walkout, this might be more difficult.
3. Close the drain valve.
4. Turn on the pump until the pressure gauge shows 5 psi.
5. Shut off the pump.
6. Start pumping air into the tank through the air valve until its up to
the lower pressure. In my case this was 25 psi. I used a bike pump and
my arm felt about twice its normal size when I was done.
7. Turn the pump back on.
The problem I had was a bad air valve core. A trip to the auto parts store, 15
cents, and a little fiddling fixed it. To get the valve core out, you can
get a cap for the stem which also (upside down) fits in to the stem and
acts like a wrench. A bic ballpoint pen cap has worked in a pinch (for a bike).
Good Luck
Ed
|
58.881 | I'll try it and see... | NOVA::DAVISON | Jay Davison, Database Systems | Thu Dec 03 1992 09:05 | 11 |
| Thanks - this is exactly what I'll try. I got my hands on an
air compressor, so, if nothing else, my arm won't explode trying
to fill it by hand.
In -.1, I didn't understand what you meant by a bad air valve core and
the replacement directions. Can you elaborate for the uninitiated?
How did you know this was the problem - was air leaking out of the
valve after you refilled the bladder (how could you tell)? Also, how
will I know if I need to replace the whole tank - if it fails to hold
the air pressure over some period of time? Thanks again everyone for
the help.
|
58.882 | portable compressed air tank | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Personal_Name | Thu Dec 03 1992 10:25 | 9 |
| In some types of pressure tanks like my "older" type with out a bladder.
The air is just at the top of the tank. Over time that air is absorbed
into the water and I have to recharge the tank. Nothing to it, I use
my portable air tank that I fill out in the shop and pressureize my
water tank.
Air valve: Same as the valves that keep air in your tires on your car.
TMW..Jim
|
58.883 | Bladder test? | NOVA::DAVISON | Jay Davison, Database Systems | Thu Dec 03 1992 11:25 | 4 |
| Good point. I'm not sure if I have a tank bladder or not. How does
one tell, given that I don't have a manual? The tank looks quite old -
it's pocked with small rust marks on the outside. Anyhow, I'm hoping that
a simple recharging of the tank will correct the situation.
|
58.884 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Thu Dec 03 1992 13:21 | 44 |
| Re: valves. Put some pressure intothe tank. Squirt a little water into
the valve. Mix in a little dish detergent if you like to make this
easier. If you see bubbles forming you have a bad valve.
Take a close look inside the valve. You will notice that
the *inside* of the valve stem is threaded as well as the outside.
There will be a small cross piece that holds the actual valve assembly
in place. Some valve caps are made of metal and rise to a peak that is
slotted to fit over this cross piece when the cap is inverted and
inserted into the valve stem. (Are you still with me?) If you manage to
get this far the rest is a simple matter of twisting the valve cap
which will act as a valve wrench to remove the defective valve
assembly.
You mention that your tank has some small rust marks on the
outside. Check them out carefully. Your tank may be near the end of its
usefull life anyway. Mine developed a pinhole leak from one of these
rust spots. Fortunately it was small enough that it gave me a few days
to replace the tank, but then my tank is in an outside shed so the
water from the leak was not a problem.
Unfortunately, I tried following some of the advice in here about
using a screw and washer to plug the leak. It was probably my fault for
using a sheet metal screw instead of a mschine screw, but I managed to
turn that pinhole leak into a 1/4 inch hole very effectively.
The fact that you see water coming from you valve is a good
indication that your bladder is shot if you even have one at all. If
you want to stretch the life out of this tank to the max, I would
suggest that you just keep pumping air into the thing at regular
intervals, to replace any air that dissolves. Be prepared to deal
with two risks: 1 - if you fail to replace the air often enough you will
get the fast cycles, 2 - eventually the tank will leak.
FWIW replacing these tanks is not too difficult if the new tank has
the same layout as the old. You'll need a pipe wrench or two,
screwdrivers, and a regular mechanics wrench. Assuming the same layout
and the you know which end of the wrench to hold you should be able to
replace the old tank in 4 hours. (including going to the store to buy
it.)
good luck,
Mark
|
58.646 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Thu Dec 03 1992 19:56 | 17 |
| Some of the earlier replies here indicate that a well that is deeper
than 50 feet will not have problems with ground water runoff. We are
considering a house with an 80 foot well that produces 4 gallons per
minute. It's also less than 20 feet from the road. I had some
concerns about this so I called up a well driller. My questions are:
1) Is 80 feet @ 4 gallons per minute likely to be too small a well for
an average household - 2 adults, 2-3 children?
2) Is there any reason to be concerned about runoff from the road
contaminating this well?
The person I spoke with about this indicated that the well should be at
least 50 feet from the road. He also thought it sounded kind of
shallow for 4 gallons per minute. Any comments?
John
|
58.647 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Dec 04 1992 07:55 | 9 |
| Most codes require that the well should be 100 feet from any source of
contamination...i.e. septic field. I'm not bothered by the depth as
long as the well provides a method of keeping the ground water out,
i.e. a wall or pipe. I would be bothered by the close location to the
street.
5 gallons/per minute is considered adequete by most lending banks.
Marc H.
|
58.885 | Bite the bullet and replace it | VSSTEG::TOWLE | Corky | Fri Dec 04 1992 08:01 | 28 |
| RE: <<< Note 3411.51 by NOVA::DAVISON "Jay Davison, Database Systems" >>>
| Good point. I'm not sure if I have a tank bladder or not. How does
| one tell, given that I don't have a manual? The tank looks quite old -
| it's pocked with small rust marks on the outside. Anyhow, I'm hoping that
| a simple recharging of the tank will correct the situation.
Bingo!! you don't have a bladder type tank. I'd bet a months pay on it.
Know what?? Recharging the tank probably won't get you anything.
You'd probably be better off to call a well and pump company, bite the
bullet and have a "modern technology" bladder type holding tank installed.
If your existing tank has small real dark colored rust spots on the outside
it's obviously an "old technology" no bladder zinc plated steel tank that's
probably on its way out anyhow. Rust spots on the outside of the tank means
pin-hole leaks will start showing up which means that when one shows up many
more are waiting to hatch which means you'd have to replace the tank anyhow
so,,,,... :-) why prolong the inevetable?
Besides, when something like a leak in the holding tank happens it usually
happens at the worst possible time and usually goes unnoticed until a major
water damage problem can't be avoided..
Get my drift?? :-)
|
58.648 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Fri Dec 04 1992 09:26 | 23 |
| First lets define what a deep well is. Any well deeper than about 30
feet requires that the pump be placed at the bottom of the well. Pumps
cannot be placed at the top of the well below that depth due to
problems with air pressure and the water column. So let's say that your
well is a deep well.
According to my well driller, the standard procedure is to drill
down to bedrock and line with a well casing (pipe). The casing is set
into the bedrock. This effectively seals out ground water. Typical
depths of the casing are 40 feet or so. From there a slightly smaller
drill size is used to go the rest of the way. This part of the well is
not lined.
I would also be worried in your situation, but then I am always
concerned about my well quality. Spend a the extra money to do a more
thorough water quality check.
If worse comes to worse you may have to drill a new well. The
average well will cost around $5,000. (Your mileage may vary
considerably.) This price includes the well equipment too. Consider
this as one more datapoint in your decision making process. Knowing how
much you are putting at risk helps put things into perspective.
|
58.886 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Dec 04 1992 09:26 | 5 |
| RE: .53
Like Christmas at 2:00 AM
Marc H.
|
58.887 | checked instructions on my tank | AIAG::VALCARCE | 'n evryday the paperboy brings more. | Fri Dec 04 1992 09:36 | 19 |
| re .49
> How did you know this was the problem - was air leaking out of the
> valve after you refilled the bladder (how could you tell)?
The valve was leaking, check with soapy water as mentioned above. (A little
spit works too.) The cap that screws onto the valve stem actually stopped
the leak for a while (about a year !) But I eventually had to replace it.
The explanation in .52 on valves pretty much says it all.
The brand name on my tank is Clayton Mark. I have no idea if it has a bladder
or not. The instructions actually say to first run the pump through one
cycle (I think that means until it hits the high pressure and shuts off),
shut the pump off and then drain the tank to 5 psi. This assumes you're
starting with an empty tank. I think filling it to 5 psi achieves the same
thing. Also, the directions say to shut off the valve on the output side
before charging the air. I shut it off for the whole operation to avoid
draining all the pipes.
|
58.649 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Fri Dec 04 1992 10:17 | 35 |
| > Spend a the extra money to do a more
> thorough water quality check.
But that's only a single data point.
I think the question was more about road runoff affecting a 'shallow' well.
In this aspect, there's probably a concernable difference between a 40ft well
and, say, a 200ft well.
So an obvious question might be, does it look like road runoff would make it's
way to the well given the surrounding topology. But then, any underground
water flow plays a part as well. The well may be pulling water from any
direction.
What are other houses in the neighborhood like? Have they had problems?
-----
OK, I just chatted with my wife. She's an environmental engineer with the
state of CT. She used to work in water compliance. She handled all the well
stuff when we bought recently...
- Call MASS DEP (Dept of Environmental Protection) to see what the latest
regulations are (for location, depth, etc). While the well may have been
put in to regulations at the time, regulations change (usually more strict)
and you may want to see if if would pass today's regs. (eg, closeness to
road, septic, other wells, house, etc).
- Call local health department. The may have a 'drinking water' section which
can help. In particular they told us what extra things to test for in the
water given your circumstances (road salt runoff, did the previous owners
use lawn chemicals, garden or farm chemicals, is it near a highway, gas
station, etc...)
Dan
|
58.650 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Fri Dec 04 1992 12:23 | 21 |
| >> least 50 feet from the road. He also thought it sounded kind of
>> shallow for 4 gallons per minute. Any comments?
I'm not sure why it should be "kind of shallow for 4 gallons per
minute." My grandfather's farm had a dug well maybe 15'-20' deep
out in the middle of the pasture, and it supplied enough water for
16 people and 50 cows, so it was certainly producing more than 4gpm.
It's also interesting that even though the well was out in the
middle of the pasture with all the cows around, in a low spot,
it never had any contamination any time they had it tested.
As long as the well casing is intact and there's no leak (to speak
of) where the casing enters the bedrock, it should be pretty safe.
Get the water tested though - that's the only way to know for sure.
Put a water test into the P&S agreement as one of your conditions
of purchase and let the seller pay for it. Figure out what things
you want tested for, and list them. I'd go for coliform bacteria
and salt at least; you probably can't justify asking for too many
tests, as some of the tests get pretty expensive, but those two are
pretty basic. If I'd only known to do that when I bought my house....
|
58.651 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Fri Dec 04 1992 14:14 | 6 |
| What I meant by "kind of shallow for 4 gallons per minute" was that at
80 feet deep, there's not a lot of water in reserve so that 4 gallons
per minute might not recharge the well fast enough under heavy water
usage.
John
|
58.652 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Fri Dec 04 1992 14:58 | 4 |
| re: .22
Duh...yes. You're right.
|
58.888 | Just want to note a related experience...for others reference. | NOVA::FEENAN | Jay Feenan Rdb/xxx Engineering | Fri Dec 04 1992 20:05 | 25 |
| Just FYI...a few years ago my pump burned out. Basically because is was a
submerged pump (and not easily heard in as in this case). Well when the
system was 'analysed' we found out that we needed a new tank...bladder was
bad. So to make a long story short. The Well and Pump companies stated it
would be say 1500 to do everything. new pump, wiring to the pump, new tank
plumbing to the tank, pulling the pump. I didn't have the money...so I
asked them to break down the costs from the list above. The pump was about
the same as Sears' price. I didn't want to pull the pump...I didn't know
what to do (but now do) and the wiring was minimal...but the tank was
big $$$ in comparison to the tank I could get at Sears. So knowing this
I told them to get to work pulling the pump...ran off to Sears and all they
did was replace the pull the pump, rewire, and replace with a new pump...while
I installed the new tank. They couldn't believe the price that the tank was
(If I remember correctly it was $135.00 vs. their $400) and I did the inside
plumbing (small changes)...ended up saving big bucks about 800.00
Two things I just wanted to note...a bad tank can easily burn out a pump...
especially the submersed pumps since the torque makes them turn and rub
against the sides of the well pipe....so this cycling is NO GOOD and takes
literally years off the life of the pump.
And secondly, some of the easy DIY stuff can save large amounts of $$ when you
break it down a bit.
-Jay
|
58.653 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Mon Dec 07 1992 13:31 | 9 |
| Does anyone have any ideas about how much water common household
operations use? For example, what are some typical rates of water flow
from a shower or a kitchen sink? How about a washing machine? Any
ideas how much water is used for washing? How about a garden hose?
Any ideas on the rate of water flow for a hose with no nozzle on it
running full blast. I realize these numbers vary considerably but I was
hoping for some ballpark estimates.
John
|
58.654 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Mon Dec 07 1992 14:03 | 8 |
| re: water hose from a hose: turn it on and time how long it takes you
to fill a container of known volume, like a 5-gallon pail.
Low-flow shower heads are typically rated at about 2 gpm, I think,
but that has got to depend on water pressure. You can do the same
thing with a shower - time how long it takes to fill a container.
|
58.889 | All set (for now)... | NOVA::DAVISON | Jay Davison, Database Systems | Wed Dec 09 1992 11:43 | 10 |
| Thanks everyone.
I drained and recharged the tank, as suggested via the directions in .48.
This seems to have corrected the problem, at least for the time being.
The pump now runs only after the holding tank has been drained of
most of its water, and will run for about 2 minutes. Water no longer
comes out of the tank valve, so I think I have the correct water to
air ratio (for now).
I'll keep an eye on the tank, however. I realize that it's not going
to last much longer.
|
58.890 | quick question, need a quick answer | MILPND::STUART | | Fri Dec 11 1992 12:00 | 10 |
|
I need a quick answer with the impending storm.
When we lose power, obviously the well pump doesn't run.
Someone told me to dump water into the toilet tank when
you flush so you can continue to use the facilities in an
extended outage. Won't this drain the well holding tank
and you would have to re-pressurize it when the power was
restored ?
|
58.891 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Is the electric chair UL approved? | Fri Dec 11 1992 12:45 | 8 |
| re .58:
The water system will lose pressure the first time anyone draws water if not
before. The water in the toilet tank is only so you can continue to use the
toilet, it will not supply water to the rest of the house even if you wanted
it to.
-Mike
|
58.892 | The Good Old Days | KALE::ROBERTS | | Fri Dec 11 1992 13:04 | 9 |
| Yes, this is the real drawback to a well and electric pump. After
hurricane Gloria, I went for 6 days without water in the house.
Luckily, my next door neighbor was a plumber, and he put a
hand-operated pitcher pump on the well in the barn, where I had 10
horses to water! (Did you know that it takes 42 "pumps" on the handle
to fill a 20-qt bucket? I know now why pioneer women died young -- and
were glad of it!) 8^)
-ellie
|
58.893 | 8�) | LUNER::ROBERTS | two fingers stringed together | Mon Dec 14 1992 05:56 | 8 |
|
re: isolated water systems.
on the other hand, if you have a small portable generator, you can
run the well off that. If you're on a city hookup, you'll have to
wait in line like everyone else.
|
58.894 | Generators for well pumps | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Mon Dec 14 1992 08:41 | 5 |
| RE small portable generator:
Not always. Some pumps (mine at least) which are real deep and need to
be real strong are 240v. The generator I bought for such emergencies
only does 120. Anybody want to arrange a swap?
|
58.895 | | LUNER::ROBERTS | home for the holidays | Mon Dec 14 1992 09:16 | 3 |
|
I was thinking shallow well like i have. But there are units that can
do 220v if you need it.
|
58.896 | use a bucket | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Mon Dec 14 1992 09:41 | 8 |
| Well, did you lose power? We had only a couple of minor glitches (on
the other hand, my back is complaining this morning...).
The easiest thing to do for the toilet is to fill several buckets with
water and keep them in the bathtub. Flush with the water from a
bucket, and not unless flushing is necessary for hygiene.
/Charlotte
|
58.897 | melt snow to flush | KOLFAX::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Tue Dec 15 1992 14:10 | 5 |
| To flush the toilet you can always bring in some snow and let it melt. After
the duties are done, just dump a bucket of ice water into the toilet bowl.
I'd consider using the bathtub to store the melted snow.
Al
|
58.898 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Dec 15 1992 15:31 | 8 |
| RE: .65
Typical ratio is 10:1...meaning 10 inches of snow equals 1 inch of
water.
I use a stand by generator.
Marc H.
|
58.899 | | MANTHN::EDD | Jiggle the handle... | Tue Dec 15 1992 15:33 | 9 |
| > Typical ratio is 10:1...
That's the same rule of thumb I've always used, but my experience
Saturday leads me to believe that's for light, fluffy snow.
Saturday I was getting 5:1 by packing the snow into a pan and putting
it on the stove to melt.
Edd
|
58.900 | 20 minutes without power | MILPND::STUART | | Thu Dec 17 1992 11:47 | 10 |
|
We only lost power for about 20 minutes Friday morning. We kept a
bathtub full incase. Now, my original question....
My concern is draining the pressure tank of the well. When you push
down the toilet handle even though you're puting water into the
toilet tank you open the water feed to the toilet. Does this take
water from the pressure tank and will I have to recharge it ?
Randy
|
58.901 | | MANTHN::EDD | Jiggle the handle... | Thu Dec 17 1992 12:01 | 8 |
| Flushing *will* decrease the amount of water in the pressure tank,
as the compressed air is what will force the water to go to the
toilet.
If you have a bladder in the pressure tank, you should be able to
maintain your pre-charge.
Edd
|
58.902 | | TLE::TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Opportunities are our Future | Thu Dec 17 1992 12:07 | 8 |
| We had power go out once when my mother was visiting and I was at work. We
never warned her about not using water when the power goes out, so she
drained the tank. I did need to play with the manual switch by the tank to
get it refilled, but other than that and the usual noises and crud when you
drain a system, we've seen no ill effects. The bladder is still
functioning.
Gary
|
58.903 | ? | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Fri Dec 18 1992 16:06 | 6 |
| Why is it a problem to drain the tank? I've done this several times
while working on my water softener. I've also drained the tank and
shut off the pump a couple of times, and all I had to do to get
water again was turn it on.
Larry
|
58.904 | a rose is not a rose is not a rose | KOLFAX::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Fri Dec 18 1992 17:50 | 26 |
| <Why is it a problem to drain the tank? I've done this several times
<while working on my water softener. I've also drained the tank and
<shut off the pump a couple of times, and all I had to do to get
<water again was turn it on.
<
The last tank I had did not have spigot at the bottom. To drain the tank
required disconnecting the pipes, which I presume some folks are not inclined
to do without guidance as
1: it can make a mess all over the floor
2: if you've never done it, that does not jump to mind as the obvious
way to approach the problem
3: even if you have the spigot at the bottom, the flow of water slows
dramatically when the air has to bubble back through the spigot
because you didn't know (or didn't have the option) of also opening
the air valve at the same time (i.e. if you don't know what to expect
it's easy to overlook things)
There are also diffences whether you have a piston pump or a jet pump, a
deep well or a shallow well, a bladder tank or a old-fashioned tank w/o bladder.
Bottom line is it doesn't surprise me at all that people who haven't done
it before and haven't seen it done before might have some difficulty...
Al
|
58.905 | Refilling is the problem | AIAG::VALCARCE | Wherever you go, there you are. | Mon Dec 21 1992 09:39 | 18 |
| re .71
Draining the tank isn't as big a problem as refilling it. At least for the
tank I have (and evidently those of other folks here), the tank must be
properly precharged with compressed air. Failure to do this results in a
very small air space in the tank with the consequence that the pressure
cycles very quickly. When my tank gets waterlogged, the pressure cycles
from min (20 psi) to max (I set it at 50 psi) about once every two or three
seconds. As someone mentioned previously, this puts excessive wear on the pump.
Does anyone know: does a tank with a bladder not need precharging ? Is there
some other type of tank that doesn't ? That would explain the ability to
just turn on the water and go. Otherwise, if you're not precharging the tank,
you might want to check the pressure guage and see how quickly its cycling.
I don't remember off hand what the normal cycle time is, but I think its
a matter of a few minutes from when the pump shuts off at 50 psi for the
pressure to drop to minimum (with say the shower on). It takes maybe 10 or
15 seconds for the pump to pressure the tank back up to 50.
|
58.906 | keep my bladder full ? | MILPND::STUART | | Mon Dec 21 1992 12:50 | 9 |
|
Thanks for all the info.... The system I have is 4+ years old,
it was put in when the house was built. This is my first experience
with a deep well and for 4 years we just never ran the water when
the power went out. How do I know if I have a bladder ? The pressure
tank probably holds about 20 gallons.(guess I could read the manual)
Randy
|
58.907 | Boyles law ?? | KOLFAX::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Tue Dec 22 1992 02:05 | 21 |
| <Draining the tank isn't as big a problem as refilling it. At least for the
<tank I have (and evidently those of other folks here), the tank must be
<properly precharged with compressed air. Failure to do this results in a
<very small air space in the tank with the consequence that the pressure
<cycles very quickly. When my tank gets waterlogged, the pressure cycles
<from min (20 psi) to max (I set it at 50 psi) about once every two or three
<seconds. As someone mentioned previously, this puts excessive wear on the pump.
I'm confused. If I start with an empty tank, that is no water and normal
atmospheric pressure (~14psi at sea level), then when my tank is 1/2 full of
water the air pressure will be ~ 28psi, when it's 3/4 full of water the
pressure will be about 56psi. Therefore my pump should come on when the
tank is about 1/4 full of water (I split the difference between 14 and 28psi)
and should shut off at just under 3/4 full. Unless I have a bladder in the
tank whose volume is somewhat independent of the tank AND air trapped in the
tank that is not contained in the bladder has an avenue of escape, I don't
understand why I would ever need to "pressurize" the tank. The water will
pressurize the tank for me.
Al
or am I missing something here???
|
58.908 | re Boyles law | AIAG::VALCARCE | Wherever you go, there you are. | Tue Dec 22 1992 09:13 | 11 |
| re .75
Good question. I can't come up with a definitive answer off the top of my
head, but here's a couple of things to factor in. The pressure gauge
measures the difference between inside and outside. So when the pressure
inside is 14 psi, the guage reads 0. Also, on my system the gauge is in
the water line on the inlet side of the tank. So its not just measuring
air pressure, but the pressure exerted by the water in the tank (head)
(actually, that's pretty small now that I think about it. Maybe 1 or 2 psi)
I guess one reason for precharging is to make better use of the volume
of the tank.
|
58.909 | re: Boyles law | AIAG::VALCARCE | Wherever you go, there you are. | Tue Dec 22 1992 15:21 | 33 |
| re. .75 and .76. Hope this isn't too far off the subject.
ok, I thought about it some more (at lunch... no really). .75 is right about
the pressure being proportional to the volume. So compressing the air to
half its volume (filling the tank half way with water) will double the pressure.
The fact that the guage measures the difference between inside and out and
that a reading of 0 means 14 psi absolute pressure in the tank doesn't really
matter, it factors out (he said waving his hands).
These numbers are just for illustration:
Assume a tank volume of 200 gals.
Assume the pressure cycles between 28 and 56 psi
Case I
Start with no water in tank, 14 psi.
Fill tank half way (add 100 gals) to reach 28 psi.
Fill tank 3/4 (add 50 more gals) to reach 56 psi.
Now each cycle of the pump will deliver 50 gals of water, the tank will
cycle between half full (100 gals) and 3/4 full (150 gals)
Case II
Start with no water in tank, precharge to 28 psi. with compressed air.
Fill tank half way (100 gals) to reach 56 psi.
Now each cycle of the pump will deliver 100 gals. It still has to pump
as much water, but will turn on and shut off half as often, and will sustain
a more gradual change in pressure.
Looking at it another way, you need a larger tank to get the same volume of
water pumped per pressure cycle.
|
58.655 | | 7189::EDD | The keyword is survival... | Wed Feb 24 1993 07:02 | 17 |
| Last night I got home and heard the pump running in the cellar. A quick
look-see revealed a pin hole in one of theblack plastic pipes running
between the well and the pump (before the pump).
The fix looks easy enough, but I got to wondering; how does this thing
work? The water in that pipe must be under pressure, or the pump would
not have turned on. There are three plastic pipes coming thru the wall
from the well; a small (3/4") one connected to nothing. (Air return?)
The two others connect to the pump. The larger of the two (1.5") is the
one that leaked. The other is 1.25". (All sizes OD.)
Temporary fix was a water bed patch and glue and LOTS of tightly
wrapped electrical tape. :^) Still dry this AM.
Cut and splice Saturday.
Edd
|
58.656 | Its a jet pump. | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Mon Mar 01 1993 11:32 | 12 |
|
Ed, you have what is called a 'jet pump'. That type of pump is
extremely common and is used on wells deeper than about 20-30 feet.
Some part of the water is forced back to the well where it passes
through a venturi that helps force the water up the pipe. (rather than
just straight suction) So one pipe is pressure *to* the well and the
other is the siphon *from* the well. My guess is that the third pipe is
either leftover from some previous setup, or it was somebody's good
idea to leave a way to run wires to the well should there ever be a
desire to locate the pump *in* the well.
Kenny
|
58.657 | | MANTHN::EDD | The keyword is survival... | Mon Mar 01 1993 12:04 | 21 |
| Thanks for the explanation.
Common sense took a surprising hold on me Saturday just as I put the
hacksaw to the pipe, and I decided NOT to cut and splice.
Since there's only about 4" or so of pipe between the foundation and
the leak, I figured if Murphy's Law took hold and the pipe split I'd
be out of water until the ground thawed.
Instead, I simply made a better patch (much easier with the pressure
relieved), wrapped it tightly with electrical tape, and fastened two
house-clamps directly over the patch. No leaks.
Not the best fix in the world, but I've seen enough repairs snowball
to know not to get myself in too deep. If it leaks again we'll
re-evaluate.
The well head is only a few feet from the foundation. I'll repair it
properly in the spring....
Edd
|
58.317 | Any guidelines yet on radon-in-water levels? | MR4DEC::BMCWILLIAMS | Improvise if you have to ... | Fri Mar 05 1993 16:26 | 5 |
| Most of the entries in this topic are a couple of years old. Does anyone know
if the EPA or state authorities have established standards for radon level in
water yet? If they haven't come up with standards, what's holding them back?
Brian
|
58.318 | My experience... | 3744::RIPLEY | | Mon Mar 08 1993 14:26 | 20 |
|
There are standards. Seems like 10,000micro curies in water and
4 microcuries in air sticks in my mind. Last June I bought a
house that had 60,000microcuries in the water and 16 microcuries
in the air. Spent about $5,000 on a system with the result that
we now have <1000 microcuries in the water and 3.8 in the air.
The water solution was the most expensive. For the air, we simply
chaulked ALL cellar cracks/holes etc. by hand(a real killer job!!).
There is an automated chaulker that I would highly recommend to
anyone doing this. We are very happy with our solution supplier
who is "Radon Mitigation" out of Londonderry N.H. They travel so
if you need to have it done they are great. They also garrantee
the results for the specified price or they work it until it is
ok at no additional cost to you. Further, when selling a house in
the future the day is very close when the RADON specs associated
with the house will have to be made known. I know that when I
moved down here with DEC that the test was required. If any
questions send me mail at KAHALA::RIPLEY
|
58.319 | Wrong units? | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Tue Mar 09 1993 08:13 | 6 |
| Re .22:
I believe you mean PICOcuries (as in picocuries/liter) rather
than MICROcuries; PICO = 10 to -12, MICRO = 10 to -6. The
"standard" (=>recommendation) was 4 picocuries/liter in air
the last time I checked.
|
58.320 | EPA to set new (lower) radon/water limits | MR4DEC::BMCWILLIAMS | Improvise if you have to ... | Tue Mar 09 1993 13:12 | 18 |
| I learned some new, depressing information regarding radon in water today.
According to Joe Camillo of Radon Mitigation Specialists, the EPA is nearing
approval/announcement of new guidelines for radon in water in residences. Joe
says the "limit" will be 1,000 pCi/L, with a "recommended" limit of 300 pCi/L,
and will be announced by the end of the year.
Evidently these new, lower limits have come about because of new evidence that
*ingestion* of radon poses a more serious hazard than once thought. In other
words, the risk of water in radon does not come simply from breathing water
vapor as in a shower, etc. The more important threat may be in actually
drinking the water.
This is frustrating news to me. I just bought a house w/o doing a
radon-in-water test. When I finally got around to taking the test, the lab said
I have 1,116 pCi/L. Now I have to debate whether I should put in a $$$$
mitigation system.
Brian
|
58.321 | | TUXEDO::YANKES | | Wed Mar 10 1993 10:38 | 14 |
|
Re: .24
Interesting. The argument for why air-borne Radon is now a greater
threat is that since modern homes are better insulated, there is less
air exchange with the outside air -- hence a greater concentration of
Radon can build up today than was expected in homes 20 or 30 years ago.
But well water? If people haven't historically been falling over dead
after drinking well water, I question why this is now such a large
issue. (Granted, maybe they just didn't realize _why_ people with
wells were dieing at a higher statistical rate and now they have found
out why.)
-craig
|
58.322 | Drilled wells are worse than dug by a lot | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Wed Mar 10 1993 14:58 | 13 |
|
It may be that the problem is MUCH worse with deep wells than with
dug wells. I understand that the radon is much better able to escape
the water in a dug well before it is pressurized into the system where
it cannot escape until the water is used. This makes sense since a dug
well has a rather large surface area of standing water that is fairly
free to breathe to the atmosphere.
The increased use of deep wells may be causing a greater percentage
of wells to have too much radon. Of course, isn't the whole concern
about radon a rather newly discovered thing?
Kenny
|
58.323 | | MR4DEC::BMCWILLIAMS | Improvise if you have to ... | Wed Mar 10 1993 15:34 | 12 |
| I don't know where the research stands on the effects of ingesting radon. I do
know that when I sent in a vial of water for testing the accompanying form
asked me to check off a box if any residents of the house had ever had stomach
cancer (or a couple other g-i tract cancers).
The radon mitigation expert I talked to said that radon really likes to bind to
water: that's why you only get the 1:10,000 pCi/L dispersion of radon from
water into the air. So I'm not sure whether it matters what kind of well you
have. Main thing is: does it draw water from a location with radon. If so,
chances are you'll have radon coming out the tap.
Brian
|
58.989 | need to find well-head | CSSE::POTTER | | Sun Mar 21 1993 19:22 | 18 |
| My well pump has quit and I do not know where the well head is located.
Based on the distance from the house, the previous owners accounts, and
documents from the town hall I have narrowed it down to a 30'x 30' square
area. The previous owners say there was a pipe sticking 6 to 8 inches above
the ground to mark it, but my search last summer didn't find it (wish I had
looked harder then!).
Anyway this area is covered by snow and leaves (from many autumns past), I
spent this afternoon digging through snow and leaves and searching with a
metal detector - no luck. The people from the service company say the next
alternative is a backhoe - but I believe there's gotta be a better way.
Options? I have heard stories about radio tranmitters and other highER
tech solutions than a backhoe, can anyone refer me to someone...before I
go through the yellow pages and call every pump servicing company.
-John
|
58.990 | Got to be metal | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Mon Mar 22 1993 08:56 | 4 |
| Since every well head I have ever seen is a fairly sizeable chunk of
metal, I would think that a metal detector is your best bet. If you did
the area thouroughly already, I would suggest that maybe your 30x30
area needs to be rethunk.
|
58.991 | Below the frost line? | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Mon Mar 22 1993 10:04 | 2 |
| Any idea how far down it is? If it's 4' down, it may take some
finding....
|
58.992 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Mon Mar 22 1993 10:14 | 18 |
| I'll insert a story here about the time my uncle's well quit on
him the day after Thanksgiving one year. I was there visting
for the holiday, so I got involved in the Great Wellhead Search.
My uncle thought he knew right where it was - wrong! My cousin
and I started digging in the immediate area, then in the not-so-
immediate area, then in closer, then out a bit farther...pretty
soon the lawn beyond the end of the garage looked like it had been
overrun by a hoarde of demented giant woodchucks, with holes everywhere.
Fortunately, the ground around the house is quite sandy so digging
wasn't too bad, but it was still a lot of work. Finally, I dug
down right next to the foundation and dug a trench along the wall
until I found where the pipe came out of the wall. That gave us
an idea of the line the well was on, judging by the direction the
pipe went, so we started digging along that and eventually found it.
Of course, if the pipe for the well had curved at all, that wouldn't
have helped much and in fact would have been even more misleading.
Now I know why they leave well heads sticking above the ground
nowadays....
|
58.993 | once was lost now am found? | CSSE::POTTER | | Mon Mar 22 1993 12:24 | 15 |
| RE: .1,.2
The well and pump may be buried, and yes it could be 4' down. The
metal detector I rented yesterday was only good down 6" and I dug up
a steel rod that the "dectector" didn't "detect".
We thought about following the line of the pipe, but we know from
previous expericence the pipe has a right angle in it ? feet from
the house...(we know this since the pipe heads toward the septic AND
the previous owner is leading us in another direction).
Anyway, I have a guy from "Found Enterprises, Inc." coming out this PM
he says he'll tell us where to dig...I'll report back.
-John
|
58.994 | FOUND! | CSSE::POTTER | | Mon Mar 22 1993 14:57 | 12 |
| Found! by Found Enterprises, Inc.
508-832-3721
Gerald S. Pattee
Gerry came out turned the line from the tank to the pump into an
antenna and followed the static till it stopped. Then he confidently
dug his heel in the ground and said "Right here!" and it was. Took
him about 15 minutes and another 15 for me to dig up the cover to
the pump.
a happy customer,
john
|
58.995 | Soon to be looking | STRATA::CYR | | Tue Mar 23 1993 05:11 | 8 |
| John, How far down did you have to dig? Did you extend the top of the
well head above ground? The reason I'm asking is I'm going to embark on
a similar expedition, if this winter ever ends and the snow melt. I do
not currently have pump problems but I have an uneasy feeling not
knowing exactly where the well is located. I was wondering what I could
expect to have to pay for Mr. Pattee's services.
Paul
|
58.996 | expect to pay... | CSSE::POTTER | | Tue Mar 23 1993 08:10 | 11 |
| I had to dig about a foot, to uncover a concrete circular cover (about
3 feet in diameter). I pried the cover off and the pump was about
another 3 feet down in an open concrete cylinder...the top of the well.
You can either rent the equipment from Pattee ($45 a day) or have him
come out for $45 and an hourly rate of $25. I think he charged me for
his travel time to get to $80. Anyway, it was "well" worth it.
-John
ps. he's located in a Auburn MA
|
58.324 | Any HARD Data out there? | SOLVIT::LIPPITT | | Mon Apr 26 1993 18:21 | 37 |
|
I just talked to the NH EPA office (ask for Dave Chase) and asked him
about the new EPA guidelines etc. While I can't classify what he told
me as 'hard facts' in any sense of the word, he did give me information
I consider 'something less than a rumor'.
He mentioned that he 'expects' a 300 pCi/l limit on public water
supplies (any system supplying more than 10 households) by December 93. He
does not expect there to be any new guidelines for private systems
(according to Dave, no EPA guidelines exist for private wells today).
The EPA does not recommend using the activated charcoal filters method
of extracting radon from water. The EPA is concerned about the
generation of 'low level radioactive waste (LLRW)' from the accumulation of
radon byproducts over time. When I asked him what constitutes LLRW, he
had no numbers but mentioned measuring the Gamma radiation that would
be measurable through the canister walls (and concrete walls if I heard
him right!). On the other hand, he had this 'rule of thumb' he thought
he remembered from an arcticle on radon.
" If you filtered the water for an average household, from a well with
5,000 pCi/l radon level, it would take about 17 years for the filters
to be classified as LLRW."
All in all, a very 'soft/noncommital' approach for an agency I thought
was suppose to be a source of hard data and sensible guidelines.
Does anyone else have any science to define this accumulation of radon
in activated charcoal? Surely someone, somewhere, has run some test or
defined some reasonable method of estimating the accumulation of
radiation in a device as common as a charcoal filter? Something like:
xxxpCi/L * #Liters filtered * coefficient-of-absorption = #curies
> yyycuries = LLRW or < # yyycuries = Not LLRW
I couldn't get anything like that out of the EPA. As far as
ballparking the 'coefficient of absorption', my home inspector got his
pCi/L rating to go from 7000 to 200 by adding a charcoal filter under
his sink. Seem like a pretty efficient filter, at least at low flow
rates. Has anybody measured the results of adding a whole house filter?
|
58.369 | Electified well water... need recommendations! | MEMIT::BLESSLEY_S | Scott D. Blessley | Tue Jul 06 1993 08:32 | 43 |
| There are a remarkable number of notes over the years on "dirty" water,
iron-laden water, smelly water... I'm glad we're not alone :-). For
Notes archiologists out there - see ntoes 346, 845, 1789, 1912,
2417, 2989. However, while I seem to have water treatment equipment
equivalent to a small municipality (or at least it seems to cost
as much) - I have a different problem - electric water. This concerns
me more than the random minerals.
We've noticed that, when our pump runs (and only then), we can get
shocks from some of the plumbing fixtures. I've checked everything
I can think of (and can get at). ALL the grounds and neutrals in
the breaker panel (this house is only 3 years old, BTW), The
neutral wire to the pump (220V). The ground clamp at the panel.
The connection from that wire to the cold water supply. The
insulators between the well pipes and the softener system.
The GFI outlets on the softener outlet.
Where do I go from here?
The Questions: are the wires at the pump well (no pun
intended) - insulated, so there shouldn't be electrical
contact between pump and water?
I there somewhere (besides down the hole - I don't
have the equipment to pull up 300' of tubing) else
I should look?
Is the EXTREMELY high iron content of my water simply
conducting pump voltage 300' into my house?
Should I distribute ground wires to other points in
my plumbing? Maybe a bad solder joint in some of
the pipe keeps it from being properly grounded, making
for this potential (pun intended) problem?
This has got us kinda nervous... we've spend a great deal
of money on everything associated with water in this
almost new house. There's very little that hasn't yet
gone wrong. Most of it's just inconvenient - this has
the possibility to be lethal.
-scott
|
58.370 | Insulation breakdown? | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Tue Jul 06 1993 08:50 | 7 |
|
Suggest you get the electrician back that did the wiring.
Mention to him that you'd like to have the pump motor "MEGGED".
Fred
|
58.371 | It's not the iron, at leasst | ASIMOV::CHALTAS | What are you doing, Dave? | Tue Jul 06 1993 09:54 | 3 |
| I don't think the iron content of your water has any bearing on
this problem - water conducts electricity perfectly well all by
itself.
|
58.372 | Note quite true... | ASDG::SBILL | | Tue Jul 06 1993 11:34 | 9 |
|
Just a little nit for .2 ... totally PURE water doesn't conduct
electricity very well at all. It's all the stuff that's in it that
really conducts the electricity. But you have to go to great lengths to
get water pure enough so that it doesn't conduct electricity. As a
matter of fact one of the ways to measure the purity of water is to
measure its' resistance to electricity.
Steve B.
|
58.373 | The joys of foreclosed home-buying... | SHRIEK::BLESSLEY_S | Scott D. Blessley | Tue Jul 06 1993 13:29 | 10 |
| Thanks... unfortunately this is one of the 'gotchas' of buying a forclosed
home - you end up dishing out money for things that shouldn't have to worry
about in a new home. If the pump has to be pulled out of the well we're
already at $55 for the well-guys service call PLUS an electrician.
To the author suggesting the 'megging' (this is awfully close to "mugging"
which is roughly how this feels) - is this a [megohm] resistance test from pump
conductors to the case, or something like that?
-scott
|
58.374 | Doubt if the problem is in the well | 32738::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Tue Jul 06 1993 14:24 | 10 |
| I am not an electrician - I do not even play one on television - but I
would VERY seriously doubt that the problem is a bare wire in the well
which would necessitate pulling the pump. If there is a bare hot wire
down that pipe, the last thing that current 'wants' to do is to travel
back into your house plumbing.
If it were me, I would look for someplace where an additional ground
has been added to the system. Like some circuit far removed from the
panel where someone thought it would be OK to ground to a local water
pipe.
|
58.375 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jul 06 1993 14:58 | 11 |
| One thing you DON'T want to do is distribute ground wires elsewhere - you can
set up ground loops which can eat your pipes (as well as cause other problems).
I suggest calling in a well servicing company - they will know what to look
for. Don't start with an electrician. I also suggest not trying to figure
it out yourself; I do all my own wiring but I'd call in the pros in an instant
for this problem.
Steve
P.S. Say hi to Kathy for me....
|
58.376 | Meggerring can prevent "mugging". | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Wed Jul 07 1993 08:31 | 27 |
|
Electrical equipment which trips breakers, blows fuses and yet
yet refuses to give up it's secret of "why" to the VOM (volt/
ohm meter), is forced to with the megger.
You can kill the power, disconnect the leads to whatever and
get an infinity reading with a std meter. The megger sends
1000 volts down the leads which sniffs out faulty insulation.
You may end up pulling the pump out and find wiring to the
pump could be the problem.
Again, for safety's sake, call a reputable electrician and
put your mind at ease.
The cost of repairs plus being on bottled water for a couple
days (maybe) and showering at a relatives sure beats medical
bills.
Good luck! Hope it's the wiring'n not the pump.
Suggestion: Get the breaker changed to the pump also. Can't see
why it don't trip. Unless it's sized improperly. Again,
get the electrician out there.
Let us know the final results, please.
Fred
|
58.736 | Water suppy inadequate, or system problem (?) | SMAUG::FURNANZ | | Wed Jul 07 1993 09:51 | 38 |
| There is so much great information about this stuff here, it's hard to believe
I couldn't find what I was looking for...I might have missed it, but don't really
thing so. Here goes -
Backgroud info: We have a 7 year old 25' dug well, whose initial rate is
documented at 6-8 GPM. I found this out while looking through a
`building permit' file at the Amherst, NH town hall. We bought the house
(a bank repo) 1 1/2 years ago and the symptoms I'm about to describe have
been consistent since we moved in. The pump is in the basement, it's
a 1/2 HP Goulds, and I assume it's also 7 years old.
It ACTS exactly like there just isn't enough supply from the well. I have the
pressure switch cut in/out set at ~32/52. I have drained the holding tank and set
the air pressure to 28 lbs.
Symptoms: Turn on the washing machine, or turn on the hose to water the garden,
and the pressure drops gradually. Once it hits 30 lbs, the pump kicks
on. The pressure continues to drop (at a slightly reduced rate). Once
the pressure hits ~25-28 lbs, it plummets to less than 10 lbs instantly.
Of course at that point, the washing machine is drizzling, or the
sprinkler is not much more than a gurgle. Once this rate of flow is
reached, it can be maintained for hours (of course the pump os on the
whole time). When the washing machine is finally full, or the hose is
shut off, the pressure SLOWLY builds up again and the pump shuts off at
52 lbs. It will maintain that pressure without any problem.
I'm about ready to dig up the well, pull the top, and see if I can observe the
water level - then at least I'll know if it's the well or some component of the
system. Before I do that, is there some way to determine if the pump is just not
doing it's job? Or if I might have an obstruction somewhere? When I drained the
tank to set the air pressure, I also unscrewed a little cap just before the TEE
(on the pump output side of the line), and noticed what looked like a lot of
rusty colored sediment. Is there a filter somewhere that I can clean (there is
no filtration system installed). Is there some sort of a valve or other component
in the well itself?
Thanks very much for any hints or help!
Mike
|
58.737 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jul 07 1993 10:09 | 18 |
| RE: .59
I have a dug well and when the water level drops to the level of the
inlet pipe.......the same type of thing happens.
Suggestions:
1. Check the sound of the motor during the low pressure. The motor
/pump will run faster than normal (no water to pump) and you can
hear air coming into the pump...gurguling.
2. No matter what, pull the cover and see what you have! Old wells
can have many problems....animals,cave-ins,etc. Check yours out.
3. Check the condition of your cover.....maybe you need a new one.
Have young children?
Marc H.
|
58.738 | Opinions? | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jul 07 1993 10:14 | 22 |
| I also have a question.
As the previous note says...my water supply in my dug well is very
poor.
I'm currently using the well for outside water only...but...I might
switch over to private water if the water rates continue to climb.
The water level was once high in my well, when the stream that runs
near my house was dammed up (1800's). Now a days, the level is just
to low during the summer.
What do people think about driving a well point down about 10 feet
below the summer level of the well and then filling in the old
dug well? I would have to run a new line to the house...but....
that should give me a good supply of water.
***OR***
Have a new well drilled....
Marc H.
|
58.739 | Guess I better start digging... | SMAUG::FURNANZ | | Wed Jul 07 1993 11:41 | 15 |
| Marc,
Yes, the sound the pump makes when the pressure plummets is very different. The
tone or pitch drops in frequency. One thing that makes me want to have hope is
that we have this same problem even in times of high rainfall - like just this
past spring.
Yes, we have 3 boys, but I don't see how that enters into the picture - the well
is not at all visible or accessible...in fact, I was wondering how far down I
should I expect the cover to be (?) How large/heavy is it? Fortunately I have
a plot plan which pinpoints the location. Maybe I can take my 3' metal rod and
find the cover first (?)
Thanks again,
Mike
|
58.377 | Check pump wires at top of well stack | ECADSR::SCHNEIDER | Joe Schneider | Wed Jul 07 1993 12:11 | 43 |
| I had a similar problem.
We were getting shocks on the outside faucets when
turning the garden hose off.
I called in an electrician, had all the grounds redone,
New ground attached to well stack, etc.
and spent about $200 and could not resolve the problem.
This electrician suggested I call the well company.
The well company's first question was - "Have you
added fill or graded around the well stack, or
have you hit the conduit for the pump wires with
a lawn mower ?"
In fact that is what we had done, two months before
for landscaping.
He told me to turn off the power for the well.
Take the well stack cover off.
Then inspect the wires as they go over the top of
the well stack for cuts/breaks in the insulation
of the black wire, then the other wires for the pump.
He explained the stack top is rough enough to cut
the insulation as the fill around the well stack settles.
The settling pulls the wires down and across the stack top.
Sure enough, there was a small cut in the wire insulation
of the black wire, with enough bare wire in direct contact
with the well stack.
So everytime the pump came on there was live current being
conducted thru the well stack.
This is why we only go shocks when turning off the hoses.
(Inside the house was somehow protected by a break in
the ground. Luckily it was since an electrified bath would
be very serious.)
To fix the problem - I wrapped the wires as where they cross
the stack top with electrical tape and put some of that
half inch foam pipe insulation on the stack tops edge
under the wires. Replaced the well cap. Turn back on and
haven't had a problem since. A cheap fix.
JS
|
58.740 | | SNELL::ROBERTS | a roads scholar... | Wed Jul 07 1993 12:40 | 9 |
|
I have a dug well too. (Live iun Southern NH) It's about 30' deep. During
the dry months I found it better to setting the high limit to 40lbs was
plenty for our needs. This has saved wear and tear on the pump and keeps
the water from getting churned dirty. Someday I hope to have a spare $5k
to get a real well drilled.
Gary
|
58.741 | Same symptoms with a drilled well | MVDS00::GOETZ | | Wed Jul 07 1993 14:41 | 14 |
| I'm currently experiencing the same symptoms. Only, my well is
drilled, 75' deep with the pump at 65'. While running the washer or
dishwasher, the pressure will drop to less than 10psi. I shut off the
circuit breaker for the pump, let it sit for 10 minutes of so, then
turn the breaker back on. Pressure comes right up to the 55psi shut
off pressure.
I've got a few calls in for estimates to drill the well deeper (to
about 200').
Looks like it's just a little longer till we visit Mickey.
|
58.742 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jul 07 1993 14:42 | 8 |
| RE: .62
Mike,
The comment on children is prompted because dug wells are mostly
old technology...as such, the cover could be in bad shape and
dangerous. My cover was in bad shape...I have 5 young children.
Marc H.
|
58.743 | pull the cover! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Jul 08 1993 08:05 | 28 |
|
Well...... :) Looks like this could turn into a dry subject!....
If your pump is 7 years old, there is a chance it might be getting
a little loose inside and is unable to pump as good as it used to.
(guessing the pump is in the celler..?)
Second, you should find out what your well looks like inside. if
not anything, see if it has a cement cover! Now here is the got ya
part. Depending on your pump, how deep the well is or how low the
water level, and how far away from the house it is. This may be adding
up to problems you see. Off the top of my head, its something like
a 1.5" supply line over 100' run up to 25' draw level.(DONT QUOTE ME!:)
The pump I had was a 1/2hp and a small tank. Seems it was getting old
and the pump was coming on all the time for lack of being able to
build up pressure. I replace it with a 1hp and a 40gal tank. The
feed line should be larger but so far, everything works great.
re: shut off pump to regain press.
you might want to check and see if your feed pipe in the well
is good. Your water level might be expoesing a defect in the pipe
or a connection where when the water level climbs, it dosnt suck
any air.....
JD
|
58.378 | Fixed! And, Compuserve ain't nuthin' compared w/this service | SHRIEK::BLESSLEY_S | Scott D. Blessley | Fri Jul 09 1993 15:56 | 26 |
| And the winner is: Joe ECADSR::SCHNEIDER in note .-1. As I explained to him via
MAIL, I'd not only had landscaping as he'd described; I'd also had the top of
my well "bumped into" by a carpenter's truck, he cracked the cap and replaced
it. Apparently when the damage was fixed, they pinched one of the conductors
between the gasket that's supposed to keep it all dry, and the cast iron well
cap.
So I'm out there yesterday in 90 degrees and 90% humidity, with a
lightening/thunderstorm looming overhead, re-taping copper wires and holding on
to a ground rod (effectively) wondering whether I'd get finished, soaked, or
electricuted first. As you might guess it wasn't the latter; in fact I beat the
rain, too. I did end up COVERED in rust, left over from the Spring when the
ground water oozed up thru the top of the pump. My hands and forearms were
COMPLETELY orange, as was everywhere I'd touched on my body while swatting
mosquitos and the like...
If you combine the various bits - scraped insulation on the wire, crimped when
installed, rough metal pump cap, sitting in rusty water for several days - hard
to imagine there wasn't something more tell-tale - like smoke! The nightcrawlers
should have been a sign :-)
So... I believe our problem is solved. Thanks to all for their suggestions, and
to ECADSR::SCHNEIDER in particular for his point-off-the-curve but completely
accurate characterization. I raise my glass of anemia-fighting water to you.
-s
|
58.379 | CURIOUS | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Fri Jul 09 1993 16:14 | 10 |
|
On why the breaker didn't trip out..
Suggest you "excercise" the breaker a few times or invest
in a new one.
Yeah, I'm very safety conscious.... Especially with electrons
runnin' where they ain't sopposed to.
Fred
|
58.380 | high resistance connections | SPEZKO::LEMIEUX | | Fri Jul 09 1993 16:35 | 16 |
| If you have a high resistance ground path it won't necessarily trip the breaker
during a fault like that even if it's a perfectly good breaker. Just like when
we humans grab a live wire and are standing on cement in bare feet....we just go
poof and the breaker never knew we there. The load we presented probably only
drew milliamps. It's enough to kill us but won't trip a breaker.
The load presented by the fault to the well casing wasn't enough to trip the
breaker because of the high resistance path it had to travel back to the service
entrance equipment. I'll bet that well casing isn't "bonded electrically" to the
service entrance with a #8 gauge copper wire is it :') If it was it would
probably have tripped the breaker. (if it is bonded check the connections on both
ends for good continuity)
later
Paul
|
58.381 | Renegade electrons?? | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Fri Jul 09 1993 16:44 | 11 |
| To someone who understand electricity better than me (99% of this
conference.....?)
Assuming the power wire was indeed grounding to the well casing, and
given that electrons want nothing more than to get to ground, and given
that the easiest way for them to do so was to simply run down the well
casing to the ground that the well casing was in, why did some of these
nasty little buggers decide to take what had to be a highly resistive
trip all the way back into the house, up to the second floor bathroom,
out the faucet, and into the body of the poor basenoter? I thought
electrons were lazy little guys who always took the easy way out.
|
58.382 | I'll try.... | SPEZKO::LEMIEUX | | Fri Jul 09 1993 17:34 | 34 |
|
What they were feeling is thier body becoming an alternative path to ground
due to a plumbing system that was electrified.....probably through the water
contained in the well casing and in the pipes. (I suspect that the water system
isn't bonded properly. This type of situation is what the bonding scheme is
designed to prevent. Properly bonded systems don't become electrified)
The pipe between the well and the house is most likely plastic therefore it
is not electrically connected to the plumbing in the house.
The electrons must return back to the neutral wire in the service entrance
at a fast enough pace (amperage) to heat the breaker element that trips the
handle into the off position. If the electrons can only find a path back to the
neutral through the "earth" it becomes a problem. The high resistance of the
return path does not allow the electrons to travel fast enough to heat up
the breaker enough to trip...The "earth" is a lousy conductor at these voltages.
So in the mean time while the pump is on the entire water system is electrified.
Equate it to this: apply voltage to a piece of wire that is not connected to
anything. It's simply suspended in air.(high resistance) Measure that voltage
anywhere along the wire. It will be approximately the same anywhere along that
wire. Now attach a heating element along that wire somewhere and of course
connect the other end to a neutral. The element heats up. Now measure that
voltage along the wire again. It's still approximately the same voltage anywhere
along the wire. The faucet handle could have been measured for voltage in the
same manner. It's just like the wire. The entire wire or pipe in this case is
electrified. The connection to the well casing is just the heating element. The
"earth" is also pretty tough to heat up.
Make any sense? I apologize if I'm not clear...
gotta run
Paul
|
58.383 | Square Deal on Square D | SHRIEK::BLESSLEY_S | Scott D. Blessley | Mon Jul 12 1993 15:19 | 9 |
| One last comment re: "change the breaker". I did. When it was originally
installed, they used two single-circuit breaker (for a 220V line). Tacky?
Dangerous? Stupid? So, a some point when I had a spare $20 or so, I replaced
the two singles, with a single double (ain't English great).
Your's in homeowning,
-scott
|
58.658 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Jul 19 1993 15:12 | 7 |
| Has anyone drilled a well point themselves? I'm thinking of putting a
well point into the bottom of my old dug well. Maybe 10 feet below the
ground water line.
Comments?
Marc H.
|
58.659 | use a homemade piledriver | COAL05::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Mon Jul 19 1993 16:24 | 21 |
| < Has anyone drilled a well point themselves? I'm thinking of putting a
< well point into the bottom of my old dug well. Maybe 10 feet below the
< ground water line.
<
I helped my father-in-law drive a well point out on the Cape 15 years ago.
He rigged a tripod made of 10' long 2" iron pipe (like you see the swing sets
at the school playground) with a small electric motor and a capstan mounted on
one leg. He had a pulley hung from the peak of the tripod. We ran a 1/2" rope
with a 25 lb (about 25 anyway) weight. After getting everything lined up he
used the capstan to lift the weight and then let if free-fall onto the casing,
pounding the point into the sand. The weight was had held to guide it to the
casing. Once he had the top of the casing within a foot or so of the ground
he screwed another length of casing and started again. As I recall he dropped
the point about 30' or so this way.
It worked great, but there were NO rocks to deal with. As I write this I
realize there are lots of details which I don't remember very well, but you
can get the idea of what we were doing...
Al
|
58.660 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Jul 19 1993 17:01 | 6 |
| RE: .30
Sounds similar to the wells my father did. How far into the ground
water did you go?
Marc H.
|
58.661 | 10' of water | COAL05::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Mon Jul 19 1993 18:40 | 1 |
| About 10' as I recall...
|
58.662 | | XCUSME::TOMMYB::BERKNER | Wonderful person. | Tue Jul 20 1993 13:19 | 24 |
| I drove a well point about 20' (hit water at 10') in a nice sandy area
of Wisconsin.
Made a driver of a larger piece of pipe about 3' long and screwed
a cap on one end. Had two handles welded onto the pipe. Just raised the
pipe up and let it drop. It actually goes quite fast.
______
|______| Cap
| |
| |
| | Pipe
\/\/\/
\/\/\/
| |
__| |__
| | | |
| | | | Round stock
| | | | for handles
|__| |__|
| |
|____|
Tom
|
58.663 | depends on soil type--and ledge | SALEM::LAYTON | | Wed Jul 21 1993 15:56 | 6 |
| Clay in the soil renders the point useless. We wasted a few of these
puppies at the camping area my family owned when I was a kid. Pipe for
the tripod was expensive, 5 or 6 inch diameter pine logs were not.
Carl_I'm_not_a_dowser_nor_do_I_play_one_on_TV_Layton
|
58.484 | What's at the end of the pipes that I can't see? | MANTHN::EDD | Earthmen have no defense... | Mon Jul 26 1993 16:15 | 23 |
| Seems an appropriate note...
Last winter one of the two black plastic pipes that lead from the
well pump (in the cellar), thru the foundation, and out to the well
developed a pin hole leak. I patched it (water bed patch kit, vinyl
tape, and hose clamps) and vowed to replace the pipe "when the ground
thaws")
I arrived home Saturday to find another pinhole leak had sprung up to
remind me that (a) the ground thawed, and (b) this pipe ain't gonna
last forever.
The pipes will come off the pump easy enough, but I've no idea what to
expect at the well-head, as it's buried about 3' underground and I've
never seen it. What's out there? A couple fittings with hose clamps
like at the pump? Something more complicated? Is there typically a
housing of some sort at the head, or does the whole thing just lie
simply buried in the dirt? (Making the excavation a real horror show!)
Anything I should be aware of? It seems it should be easy enough, but
how many times have we said those words?
Edd
|
58.485 | Just a buried iron whatsis | ASD::DIGRAZIA | | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:12 | 16 |
|
My well head was merely an iron fitting with the plastic pipes clamped
to it, buried in the dirt. I have a wash well, so there is only the
fitting with the plastics from the house, and the iron pipe going 30'
down. If I remember correctly, that iron pipe is a concentric pair.
The pump pumps water down and a Venturi sprays water back up from the
bottom.
Since your pump is inside, you also must have a shallow well, so you
must have the same iron blob at the top of the well that I have.
I failed to find it with a metal detector, and I wound up digging test
pits every few feet, following the plastic pipe. Make sure you mark
the well's location.
Regards, Robert.
|
58.486 | | MANTHN::EDD | At the wheel of a Shark De Ville | Thu Jul 29 1993 16:06 | 13 |
|
This about right?
_________---------------------
| ------____________________ To Pump
| | ______---------------
| | | ---_______________ To Pump
| | | |
| | | |
__| |_____| |___
| | <--Iron Thing
|______________|
| |
| |
|
58.487 | | ASD::DIGRAZIA | | Fri Jul 30 1993 11:00 | 35 |
|
Re .7: Close. More like this, with the plastics coming in from the
side, with a hex nut on top. My well guy removed the hex nut to drop
chlorine tablets into the top. Mine is about 4 feet down.
+++ <---- hex nut
| |
| +______---------------------
| +------____________________ To Pump
| |
| ++
| +____--------------------- To Pump
| +----_____________________
| |
__| |___
| | <--Iron Thing
| |
| |
| |
Incidentally, after you dig it up, you might build a subterranean pit
out of concrete blocks or a short length of concrete culvert. I
couldn't find any culvert, so I used blocks. My pit comes to about 18"
below the surface. I covered it with 2 layers of pressure-treated 4x6,
and built a low mound of dirt above it to avoid rainwater pooling.
This winter and spring I had no trouble with freezing and flooding
(in very Southern N.H.). Note that I have the pump at the well head,
only a few inches above the bottom of the pit. This actually made a
difference in my electric bill, compared to pumping from the basement.
Regards, Robert.
|
58.488 | It had to be THAT pipe... | MANTHN::EDD | At the wheel of a Shark De Ville | Fri Jul 30 1993 11:51 | 11 |
| Thanks.
I hope the connections are "easy", like "slide the pipe over the nipple
and attach hose clamps..."
I'm almost a little irked. The pipe costs what? About 10 cents a foot
or so? Even at 4 times that amount, I'm looking at a $5.00 repair.
Plus labor. (Ouch!)
Edd
|
58.489 | chlorine? | MKOTS3::ROBERTS_CR | dust off those rusty strings | Fri Jul 30 1993 13:57 | 6 |
|
what's this about chlorine tablets in a well? we just moved to a house
which has its own well and septic. are we supposed to do something
about chlorine?
carol
|
58.490 | Wells are great. | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Fri Jul 30 1993 14:12 | 5 |
| No Carol, you only have to do that if there is a buildup of bacteria
or algae in your well. Its almost never a problem unless the well sits
idle for a while.
Kenny
|
58.744 | | MANTHN::EDD | Kraftwerk, Unplugged | Sun Aug 15 1993 18:11 | 31 |
| Hmmmm. In one of these notes I recently inquired about the connections
between my pump and the (buried) top of my well, but now I can't find
the note...
Anyhow, the digger man came over today and before he even started the
machine we talked about the well. He suggested as long as I have the
hole open I replace not only the pipes from the house to the top of the
well, but also the pipe(s?) going down the well and the foot valve. I
agreed it was the right thing to do and we put off digging until next
week.
...so I bounce over to Sears to check the price of foot valves.
(Rathole: "Can I help you?", "I'm looking for a foot valve." "Oh, we
don't have any. We sometimes do, but not today." "OK, thanks." He
leaves, and I proceed to check out the 1/2 dozen foot valves on the
shelf. Rocket scientist...)
Duh. Three sizes, so I don't buy any.
Question 1: All of the valves carried by Sears were "screw ons" with
internal threads on the output end. Is that "standard"? Or is there
likely to be some other type of fitting that I won't know about until
I pull up 125' of pipe? I'd like to have all the parts on hand.
Question 2: How many gallons of water will fit in 125' of 1.5" pipe?
If possible, I'd like to have that much water put aside to refill the
pipes, instead of "plunging" the whole mess trying to fill it.
I hate wells. ;^)
Edd
|
58.745 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Mon Aug 16 1993 13:35 | 12 |
|
It looks like you'll need about 20.7 gallons if the 1.5" pipe is 1.5"
INTERNAL diameter.
Is it the foot valve that prevents drainback? My 'one way' valve is
near my pump, but then I don't have a two pipe system. If your one way
valve is NOT at the bottom of the well, or at least at the well head, I
don't know how you will be able to keep the pipes filled. (The water
will just drain down into the well.
Kenny
|
58.746 | | MANTHN::EDD | Kraftwerk, Unplugged | Mon Aug 16 1993 13:41 | 4 |
| Yes, the footvalve is at the bottom of the pipes, and will prevent the
20.7 gallons (THANK YOU!) from draining back in....
Edd
|
58.747 | Time for a new pump? | WRKSYS::DUTTON | Inspiration, move me brightly... | Mon Aug 16 1993 13:56 | 15 |
| We don't have a well, but our house sits on top of a hill, so we have
a pump and tank system to boost our water pressure to usable levels.
In the last few weeks the pump has started to have problems. The relay
trips at around 30 psi and the pump sounds like it's trying to start,
but just sits there and hums (and gets hot). A little persuasion
(read: a swift kick) and it starts up. This pump is the original from
when the house was built 22 years ago, so I'm left with a decision:
(1) Replace the pump -- how long does one of these pumps last? What
is the replacement cost?
(2) Repair the pump -- maybe the impeller is just clogged? or the
bearings are shot? How much to "refurbish" the pump, and how
long can I expect it to last afterwards?
Opinions?
|
58.748 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Aug 16 1993 14:12 | 6 |
| RE: .70
Have you oiled the pump motor? Sounds like lack of lubrication.
Pumps have oil and grease fittings.
Marc H.
|
58.749 | | WRPTEN::dutton | Inspiration, move me brightly... | Mon Aug 16 1993 14:46 | 10 |
| re: .71
Yup, I know about the fittings. There's an oil fitting at one end of the
pump. When the problem started, I tried adding a high grade machine oil
at that inlet. Doesn't seem to be helping at all. I'll look tonite to
see if there's any kind of grease fitting elsewhere on the pump.
Any other thoughts, folks?
-Todd
|
58.750 | Try this... | GERALD::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Mon Aug 16 1993 14:51 | 9 |
|
If the motor is capacitor start, the switch for it (A set of
centrifically operated contacts) may have gone bad. Or any other part
of the start circuit may be bad. If you can see any part of the motor
shaft (Like between the pump and impellor) Shut off the power to it,
grasp it with pliers and see if it turns freely. That will tell you if
it is a bearing problem or a start problem.
Kenn
|
58.604 | need to find well pipe before backhoe does | CSC32::S_MAUFE | this space for rent | Wed Aug 18 1993 16:14 | 19 |
|
seems like a good note for me to hijack 8-)
I'll be adding an addition any day now, so will be excavating. I want
to lay down an underground 200Amp cable from the pole to the addition.
Trouble is the path from the pole to the addition crosses the pipe from
the well to the house at near 60 degrees.
How do I find the water pipe? I know where the well is, I know where it
enters the house, but don't want to assume its a straight line from A
to B. And I don't want the backhoe to dig it, and the assoicated pipe
up. I need to back-hoe to dig around it where the new electrical cable
crosses the path of the pipe.
Will a metal detector work, the pipe is PVC but perhaps the well wire
is nearby? What kind of detector will find a 3 foot deep wire? Actually
will the wire be easier to find with current running through it?
Thanks ! Simon
|
58.605 | Done | MANTHN::EDD | Kraftwerk, Unplugged | Sun Aug 22 1993 18:22 | 34 |
| Yesterday the digger man came and we ripped out everything from the
pump (in the cellar) right down to the foot valve. All things
considered, not a bad job.
A couple hints to anyone attempting this in the future:
1. Buy the pipe a couple days before hand. Unroll it and let it relax.
I unrolled 2 100' foot lengths down the length of my driveway, letting
the blacktop heat aid in the relaxation. Trying to stuff 100' of pipe
bent to a 3.5' diameter circle down a 6" hole just doesn't work. Don't
use too much force when straightening. The pipe kinks easily.
2. Have a LOT of water on hand before you start. I filled the tub, 2
10 gallon gerry cans, and a couple of milk jugs. Though I didn't need
it all, I used plenty of it.
3. Priming the pump and returning the pressure to the house was the
hardest part. (Save the purely physical part of removing the pipe from
the well.) I filled up the smaller pipe, connected it to the pump, and
then poured more water in thru the pressure gauge on the pump as
needed. It took awhile for it to finally "catch", but went pretty
smoothly. Listen for air escaping thru the breather, or bubbbles. If
you hear either, you're not done.
4. I also took a big chimney block and placed it so the bottom was
flush with the top of the well head. Should it need to be dug up again,
I'll hit the block before the well head is exposed. Don't wanna break
the casing!
5. Check the area for yellow-jacket nests and make sure the digger doesn't
place a pad on one. I didn't, and the area is swarming with the devils
right now....
Edd
|
58.751 | | MAST::DUTTON | Inspiration, move me brightly... | Mon Aug 23 1993 15:25 | 10 |
| Followup from .70...
Well, this weekend the pump died completely. Had it replaced with
a 1/2 HP Goulds by the end of the day, but now I have a new question.
When the pump runs, the pipe from the main cutoff to the pump makes
a noise that sounds like there's air in the line. The pump installer
said that it wasn't air, but that the pump was trying to draw water
from the main faster than the main could supply it.
Does this make sense? Is it correctable? How?
|
58.752 | Cavitation? | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Mon Aug 23 1993 20:24 | 3 |
| It sounds like the pump installer is referring to "cavitation", which is
when the pump pulls so hard that it creates a vacuum in the pipe. It'll
sound like air in the pipe, but there's no air.
|
58.753 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Tue Aug 24 1993 13:07 | 5 |
|
Yes, it could be cavitation. If it is, I doubt you can make it stop
without some massive changes.
Kenny
|
58.1062 | Whole house pressure pumps | COOKIE::LAWSON | Carpe Heli Diem, eh? | Tue Aug 24 1993 16:48 | 59 |
| Some of you may be familiar with my project. I actually have holes the the
ground now, and will be building walls inside of two weeks.
I'm thinking now of the water system. Our well will be drilled on Thursday.
The 1500 gallon cistern (that's the smallest concrete cistern made) is already
in place. We plan an under-powered 120VAC deep-well pump, which will run off
our inverter at night only. It's job is only to fill the cistern.
We will deliver the water to the house using a 12/24VDC pressure pump. There
are a number of options for this, and I'm curious about configurations.
1. PhotoComm Booster Pump: 12VDC 2.8gpm @ 50psi ..... $209.00
2. ShurFlow Booster Pump: 24VDC 5.0gpm @ 50psi ...... $599.00
3. ShurFlow Low-Flow Booster: 24VDC 3.1gmp @ 65psi .. $625.00
I'm sick/tired of having low-flow/pressure showers. I love the shower my
parents have in East Hartford. You don't need to use soap, the pressure
blasts you clean! This is a goal for our house.
I have no idea how a 50psi or 65psi shower feels. Does anyone know what
pressure they have in their systems (those who have wonderful showers need only
reply)?
I'm also not sure what type of volume I'm ever going to need. Pumps are similar
to batteries: two in series doubles the voltage/pressure, two in parallel
doubles the current/flow.
I'm thinking that I'll rig the cheaper pump above to start with. If I ever find
that I need more flow than 2.8gpm, then I'll rig another pump in parallel with
the current pump (one will run off the lower 12VDC loop, the off the upper 12VDC
loop).
Here's my question: I only want one pump to come on when I only need 2.8gpm or
less. If the demand is for more than that flow, then (and only then) do I want
the second pump to kick in. Any idea how to accomplish this?
My ideas are these: Set a relay on the +12V supply line to the primary pump.
When the primary is not drawing current, the +12V supply to the secondary pump
will be cut off. Build a delay into this relay such that it takes 10-15 seconds
to enable the power on the secondary pump.
The first pump will be activated when the system pressure drops below a certain
level (is this typically adjustable?). If the demand is for less than the
capacity of the first pump, then the pressure will rise above the cut-in. If
the demand is for more than the capacity of the first pump, the pressure will
stay below the cut-in level, and 10-15 seconds later, the second pump will
notice the need, and start up. They should cut-out together.
A second idea (which assumes that the cut-in pressures are adjustable, and
fairly reliable), is to set the secondary pump with a lower cut-in value. If
the pressure drops below the first pump's cut-in value, it will start. If that
pump can keep up, the system pressure will never drop below the secondary's
cut-in value. If it does, it's because the first pump could not keep up, and
the secondary pump will start as well. My guess is that I'll want to have both
pumps' cut-out value equal, lest I get a pogo effect.
Ideas?
Mage
|
58.1063 | My $.02 | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Wed Aug 25 1993 00:27 | 28 |
| I have 60 PSI coming into the house, regulated down to something lower (I
don't have a hose bib on the regulated side to connect the pressure gauge
to). My shower head has the legend "3.0 gpm" and a picture of a dripping
faucet, which I take to mean that this is a "low flow" shower head. I find
the resulting stream to be quite satisfactory.
I would expect 2.8 gpm @ 50 psi about right for one shower head. Don't turn
on a faucet or other water consumer at the same time, though. The pair of
pumps sounds intriquing though; you ought to be able to tune it so that the
shower only needs one, but an additional water draw causes the second pump
to kick in. I would do it with pressure settings, not timers. I would set
the pressure settings as follows:
pressure --->
P1 P2 P3 P4
Pump2 Pump1 Pump2 Pump1
start start stop stop
This way, if Pump1 can handle the flow, Pump2 won't start. If Pump2 starts
and they catch up, Pump2 will turn off first so that you're back to just
Pump1 trying to keep up. Then Pump1 is your "primary" pump that you always
use, and Pump2 just kicks in when and for as long as needed.
You also get automatic redundancy: if either pump fails, you still have an
automatic pump system, without changing any settings (albeit with reduced
capacity).
I presume you'll be using some sort of bladder tank to reduce pump cycling?
|
58.1064 | sounds good | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Aug 25 1993 08:40 | 10 |
|
Just for Ha, Ha's, you might want to pop in and check
out a system they might have on one of thoes large RV's.....
A low flow showerhead in combo with a 2 pump system sounds
like it just might work well. The "standing under a waterfall"
shower is great but this lowflow showerhead seem to do the job.
Keep the updates coming!
JD
|
58.1065 | Laws of physics apply here. | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Wed Aug 25 1993 09:57 | 40 |
|
You don't need 2 pumps.
Calculate your N.P.S.H. (net positive suction head) for what
you're trying to accomplish. The wrong pump will either not
deliver what you need, or if too large will cause cavitation
Cavitation is when the pumps capacity is more than the suction
(inlet) piping can deliver, the pressure is dropped below it's
vapor pressure point and it flashes off.
If you haven't the literature to assist you in doing this,
measure the length all pipe from where you plan on installing
the pump to where it terminates. Include all elbows, and
elevations, also the present pressure that enters the bldg.
and take it down to a reputable plumbing supply house and
have someone there do the calculating for you.
They will also tell you how big of a tank you'll need.
If you're in the worcester, ma. area, stop in at Central
Supply and talk to Ken Brown. Don't go without accurate
data. You'll be wasting his and your time. If it's in-
accurate, you'll have problems.
Hope this don't discourage you.
I live at a high elevation in my town and the city water
psig is only 25. I did my own figuring (new home), had
larger pipes installed for volume purposes plus a pump
and tank. Now 2 people can shower, the wife can have the
dish and clothes washers going or start them, be watering
the garden, kids can wash thier cars and someone can flush
both toilets and those in the showers feel no change in
flow or temps. Normally the pump is off. For high use
time, we turn it on and it takes the pressure up to 70
where it kicks off and 60 it's on. The "WATER PICK SHOWER
MASSAGE" works great at that pressure!
Good luck.
Fred
|
58.1066 | I can set my own laws ... starting from scratch | COOKIE::LAWSON | Carpe Heli Diem, eh? | Wed Aug 25 1993 12:38 | 8 |
| What laws of physics? I've got 1500 gallons of water with a 6ft head
ready to flow into whatever size inlet pipe I choose for the house.
I admit I don't know how fast what rate of water can be drawn through,
say 18 feet of 6inch inlet pipe, but I suspect a measly 6gpm won't come
anywhere near that capacity, so cavitation shouldn't be a problem,
right? Should I be discouraged?
Mage
|
58.1067 | | COOKIE::LAWSON | Carpe Heli Diem, eh? | Wed Aug 25 1993 12:41 | 12 |
| I've done some research, and the pumps are adjustable for their maximum
output (higher flow reduces pressure, higer pressure reduces flow). A
twenty gallon pressure tank will be used in front of the first pump.
Two separate pressure switches will be used: one for each pump. They
are adjustable for cut-in and cut-out pressure.
I will try the overlapping windows idea, suggested a few replies back,
and compare that to my idea of having equivalent cut-out pressures.
We'll see which works better (in terms of noticeable changes in the
flow during usage).
Mage
|
58.1068 | Oops, mouth flappin before eyes finish reading. | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Wed Aug 25 1993 13:06 | 11 |
|
RE: .4.
I missed the size of the line comming from the cistern to
which the pump'll be attached. Sorry 'bout that.
Sounds to me like one with a 7.5 GPM and 100 foot head
would do just right. That would put you in the 50 to
60 psig range.
Fred
|
58.1069 | | COOKIE::LAWSON | Carpe Heli Diem, eh? | Wed Aug 25 1993 13:49 | 8 |
| > Sounds to me like one with a 7.5 GPM and 100 foot head
> would do just right. That would put you in the 50 to
> 60 psig range.
Whose reply are you reading? With a 100 foot head, I'd be able to get
a 60 psi pressure with a 7.5 gpm flow through a soda straw!
Confused ... Mage
|
58.1070 | The head matters, not how much water is available | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Wed Aug 25 1993 13:57 | 9 |
|
As Fred tried to point out, you have to remember that there is static
pressure (When no water is flowing) and dynamic pressure (The *actual*
*delivered pressure* - which varies according to the run of pipe, its
size, number of elbows, flow rate, etc.) If you want 60 psi @6GPM, you
have to size for that and relize there will be a drop through the
length of pipe.
Kenny
|
58.1071 | | COOKIE::LAWSON | Carpe Heli Diem, eh? | Wed Aug 25 1993 14:15 | 6 |
| Yes, I understand about "line loss" on the output side, but
"cavitation" is an effect on the input side. It's one of the reasons
that we need to use submersible pumps in deep wells. Cavitation limits
the amount a pump can pull ... not push.
Right?
|
58.1072 | Lot's of luck to you guys... | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Wed Aug 25 1993 15:29 | 44 |
|
Mage,
This is interesting.
Where do you plan on putting the booster pump(s)?
I just re-read your original note.
I've been toying with the idea of putting a small pump
in parallel with the big one.
I have a 20 gallon tank with the bladder in it. Unless
we're using water steady for some time, I don't need
that 3/4 hp jobber starting and stopping to fill a
toilet res. in the middle of the night. A few flushes
and the pressure drops, IF the pump is on. Now, a
small 1/12th HP jobber, good enough to raise the line
pressure up to 70 - even in 5 minutes - would be great.
Should the big baby be needed the li'l feller would shut
down.
Every house I've lived in since birth has had the problem of
insufficient volume! When the wife'n I began designing this one,
I said "We're gunna have plenty of water,EVERYWHERE!" We do.
It's about 65 feet of tube length to where the water goes up
to both floors bathrooms. Just after that I've got a small
pump controlled by a thermostat which circulates hot water back
to the heater. First few days in the house and I got tired of
waiting for hot water to show up 4 feet above the cellar.
Wish I'd thought about that while the walls and ceilings were
still open. Would've run a return line down from the second
floor to the heater and I wouldn't've needed the li'l pump.
Hell, it's only about a 1/60th hp. Just enough to move the
water.
I'm sure there are going to be a thousand and one suggestions
from the many readers to aid you.
Good luck. If the bride'n I ever make it out there, I'd love
to see this place.
Fred
|
58.1073 | | COOKIE::LAWSON | Carpe Heli Diem, eh? | Wed Aug 25 1993 15:47 | 14 |
| The pump(s) will be located just inside the wall of the mechanical room
which is slightly downhill from the water-level inside the cistern.
The cistern is about 10 feet from the house, but the supply pipe must
run at least 30" below grade (frost protection), then back up through
the slab to the pump. The difference in height between the pump and
the water level is nearly six feet. There are two turns in the pipe
(whose size I have yet to choose).
We will have an "on-demand" hot water system, but didn't consider any
return lines. I think we'll live with the delay in wasting the water
in the pipes between the hot water heater and the spigot. Good idea,
recirculating it, though.
Mage
|
58.754 | | MAST::DUTTON | Inspiration, move me brightly... | Wed Aug 25 1993 19:08 | 19 |
| Yup, I think the pump is cavitating.
I can think of only three solutions...
(1) Get better pressure from the town supply. We have hydrants on our
street tapped into the main that get lots of pressure; surely
they could do better at the house? Might translate into lotsa
bucks, though...
(2) Restrict the flow at the output of the pump, on the theory that
the pump would push less water (and therefore not cavitate).
Might be hard on the pump, though, and may not work.
(3) Install a big water tank in the house (150 gal+). Let the town
supply slowly fill up the big tank, and let the pump draw
off the tank. I've heard of this being done for some shallow
well systems with low flows.
I could just live with the noise, I suppose. Does cavitation hurt
the pump in the long term?
|
58.755 | need to do something | SNOC02::WATTS | | Thu Aug 26 1993 00:11 | 21 |
| Another solution is to increase the size of the pipe running from the
town supply.
Cavitation puts an unbalanced and highly irregular load on the pump. It
will soon chop out the bearings, particularly if you have roller or
ball bearings, and will also chop out the shaft seal (suck, blow, suck,
blow, etc ...)
Cavitation bubbles form and collapse at the speed of sound in the
liquid, and are generated on the vanes of the pump impellor. Cavitation
will strongly erode the vanes. The micro events are quite energetic.
Also, the more the impellor is pitted, the more it will cavitate.
Throttling the output of the pump so that it can keep up with the
inflow is a good idea - it will cost a little more in electricity for
the volume of water but will significantly increase the pump life over
one that is cavitating regularly.
regards,
Michael Watts
|
58.756 | 2 cents more... | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Thu Aug 26 1993 08:46 | 15 |
|
The best thing to do is as mentioned about increasing the
size of the line from the water main.
I'm boosting town pressure with a 3/4 hp pump and have
no problems with cavitation. I tapped the towns 20" main
with a 2" line. The main is 340 feet away from the house.
The 2" line comes onto my property then after the shutoff,
reduces down to 1 1/2" all the way to the pump.
This could be expensive tho'. The big tank as a res before
the pump is also a good idea. You could also return about
10% or so of the pumps discharge to the suction side.
Fred
|
58.757 | | MAST::DUTTON | Inspiration, move me brightly... | Thu Aug 26 1993 16:30 | 26 |
| re: .-1
> This could be expensive tho'. The big tank as a res before
> the pump is also a good idea. You could also return about
> 10% or so of the pumps discharge to the suction side.
I'm intrigued by this idea, mainly because I think I've already
got the piping in place to do it. My current setup looks like:
-+- valve
+--------------|--------------+
|+-------------|-------------+|
|| ||
MAIN || +----+ +-----+ ||
------++----| |------| |----++---- TO HOUSE
------------|PUMP|------|TANK |----------
| | | |
| | | |
+----+ +-----+
I'd always taken the valve shown above as a bypass valve for
the system. Are you suggesting that if I crack open that valve
a bit (enabling some water "feedback") that it might eliminate
the cavitation?
|
58.388 | Well water quality testing? | MIASYS::KEATING_T | | Fri Aug 27 1993 15:11 | 26 |
|
I have a few questions about getting water tested for
my house. I looked under keyword water_quality_control
but didn't see this question asked.
It's a new house (11/92) and the well water was tested in order
to get an occupancy permit, so I'm told. While the house is still
under the builder's warranty, I want to get it tested myself to be
sure that the water is OK, meets acceptable town/state/EPA levels, etc.
The questions are -
1. What are the things that I should have the
water tested for (bacteria, metals, etc)?
I live in Windham NH and called a few places -
they have a wide range of things they could test for,
depending on what you want and how much you want to
spend.
2. Can you make any recommendations on reputable
water testing companies in Southern NH?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Ted
|
58.389 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Fri Aug 27 1993 15:47 | 10 |
|
I believe you can ask the water testing house to test 'to EPA
standards'. That's what I did. Its a basic test of one or two kinds of
bacteria and maybe 8-12 minerals/metals. I *know* that there are many
many more things that *can* be tested for, but as you up the count, so
do you up the cost - and if you're high on one that the EPA or state
hasn't set a limit on, I don't know how you could ask for water
treatment or a new well under the warranty.
Kenny
|
58.390 | | TLE::PIC9::allen | Christopher Allen, DEC COBOL, ZKO 381-0864 | Fri Aug 27 1993 16:03 | 10 |
| We used Secondwind Environmental. They're equipped to do all kinds of testing
(she did a basic analysis of our water right in our house), including
radon-in-water testing (this had to go out to a lab). She was very
knowledgable, explained everything I wanted to know, etc. Ask them what they
recommend for testing: I think they'll give you an honest and no-pressure
assessment of what you might need.
Manchester: 641 5767 or NH: 800 287 5767
-Chris
|
58.391 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Aug 27 1993 16:05 | 4 |
| Consumer Reports has repeatedly singled out Watertest of Manchester as
accurate and reliable.
Steve
|
58.392 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Fri Aug 27 1993 16:30 | 11 |
| [There's a note in here somewhere about this...anyway...]
A little knowledge about the land history may also help. For example, do you
know if the land was used for any farming before being built upon? If so, then
what type? There may be some pesticides or the such you may want to test for.
Are there any gas stations nearby (�mile?)? If so, a test for benzine(sp?)
might be appropriate.
fwiw,
Dan
|
58.393 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Mon Aug 30 1993 13:08 | 14 |
| Another idea is to talk to your neighbors and ask if they had their
water tested. We found out from one neighbor that there was arsenic in
their well water and our test showed the same for our well.
You could also call the local board of health. When my wife called the
Pepperell, MA BoH, she was told that most wells in Pepperell (as well as
several surrounding towns) have arsenic levels above the EPA maximum.
However, don't let that lull you into thinking the builder will do
anything for you. In Pepperell, the BoH doesn't care that the arsenic
levels are high so the builder told us he wouldn't put in a water
filter. In Mass, it's up to the local Board of Health regardless of
what the EPA says.
John
|
58.394 | Go to Town Hall for Town requirements; use MA labs instead | KELVIN::PACHECO | RON | Mon Aug 30 1993 15:08 | 37 |
| Ted,
I had a house built in Windham, which was completed In December, 1992.
The builder cannot get an occupancy permit without a valid and acceptable
water test. A copy of the test results are on file at town hall. It's best
if you know your lot number since that is how all plans are filed in the building
department.
NH State water testing requirement is very lenient compared to MA, that is
requiring anything above and beyond EPA basic requirements for certain ``things''
in the water as well as limits. Every town in NH has their own set of
requirements (above and beyond the EPA limits) so be sure that you tell any
testing lab what town you live in (if you're just testing for
compliancy to town building codes).
After speaking to my builder, he assured me that the Windham building inspectors
are the strictest of all the southern NH communities he's built in. (He's built
homes from northern MA to areas surrounding Manchester/Auburn.) Moreover, Windham
is one of the few Southern NH communities that require arsenic testing. (This is
not indicative of a problem in the area, but the building inspectors trying to
keep up to date and are aware of the vast amount of pressure treated lumber
being used in the past decade or so.)
Anyway, I needed a quick turnaround on my water test (to keep the builder tied
to our closing date) and wound up using a lab in Leominster. (I forgot the
name but will look it up and post it if anyone is interested.) This lab was
able to give me a 24 hour turn-around time, at no extra charge, and the testing
was much more comprehensive than what is available from any of the ``labs'' in
Derry, Londonderry, Windham or Manchester-- at about the same price. I mention
the turn-around time since some of the area ``labs'' were not equipped to do
all the tests on-site (especially extractables, lead and arsenic) and had to
send out a sub-sample to another lab.
Welcome to Windham! (Where in town are you living?)
Ron
|
58.1074 | | XCUSME::TOMMYB::BERKNER | Wonderful person. | Tue Aug 31 1993 16:31 | 21 |
| <I have no idea how a 50psi or 65psi shower feels. Does anyone know what
<pressure they have in their systems (those who have wonderful showers need only
<reply)?
My pressure controller is set to turn on at 40PSI and turns off at 60PSI. The
contoller is located about 1 foot above my basement floor at the inlet to my
pressure tank. The shower head on the first floor (about 14' above the
controller - you calculate the pressure drop) provides a shower which I find
'wonderful'. I don't have a flow restrictor, and with certain settings on
the shower head (very fine needle spray) I find the pressure to be slightly
excessive. The water travel through a 3/4" copper pipe for about 5 feet into
and out of a water filter and a water softner and then splits to the water
heater and several cold water line. It then travels through 2 1/2" copper pipes (one hot, one cold)
for a distance of about 15' horizontal and 8' vertical turning probably 6 -
90� bends.
The shower on the 2nd floor (8' higher) I find to be barely acceptable at
the 40PSI level when the pump turns on.
Hope this helps.
Tom
|
58.395 | I'll err on overdoing it, then | MIASYS::KEATING_T | | Wed Sep 01 1993 09:49 | 17 |
|
Thanks to all for the replies. At this point I will probably go
overboard a little and get some additional tests above the standard
ones. The difference in price ($45 for basic, EPA-type tests was
quoted by Policy Well Co. in Windham) vs. a more comprehensive test
by WaterTest in Manchester (Goffstown) which was $94, isn't much
compared to the peace of mind.
WaterTest required the water sample be shipped by overnite, or dropped off
the same day the sample was drawn, to make sure the bacteria readings were
accurate.
Ron, thanks for the advice to go to town hall to see the results of the
water test. I will do that too.
Ted
|
58.396 | Let us know if there are differences in results | KELVIN::PACHECO | RON | Wed Sep 01 1993 11:33 | 11 |
| Ted,
Let us know how the new testing results differ from the one on file. Wells are
unpredicatable. I plan on having my water re-tested. I know that when I first
had the water tested I had no sediment and low amounts of minerals-- a year or so
later, the water has hardened a bit and sediment is aplenty. (I have to replace
my whole house filter ~every 6 weeks. I find the Omni filters work the best.)
Ron
P.S. I'll post my result differences when I have my water re-tested.
|
58.397 | Polar Springs tankers! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Sep 01 1993 13:59 | 7 |
|
Just remember when you test your water. The test results are only good
for that day...... why?? Tomorrow, something could be introduced
into you water supply.. Just something to loose sleep over!:)
JD
|
58.758 | Losing pressure *somewhere*... | MANTHN::EDD | Look out fellas, it's shredding time... | Fri Sep 24 1993 09:14 | 47 |
| Argh, this is drivin' me bonkers...
Last winter one of the plastic pipes from the well head to the pump
sprung a couple leaks, which with the aid of glue, patches and
electrical tape I stopped.
A month or so ago I decided to replace the two pipes and dug the well
up. Most everyone who knew what I was doing said "might as well replace
the pipes *in* the well also. They're just as old.", and that seemed
like good advice. So I did. New foot valve also.
A couple weeks later, I noticed I was losing pressure at the rate of
about 6 lbs an hour which caused the pump to run about once every 4
hours. I ripped the lawn up a second time, pulled everything out of the
well, *triple* clamped all the connections, and stuffed it all back
down the hole.
Now I'm losing pressure at about 2 lbs an hour.
I wanted to see how much water would have to be lost to kick the pump
in, so I filled up a bowl at the sink. About 5.5 - 6 bowls of water
were needed to hit the cut-on point.
A small leak was found at the connection into my pressure tank, and I
thought I found the problem. 1 drop of water every 6 - 7 seconds. To
see how much water was escaping, I put the same bowl under the drip and
went to bed. Next morning, after a full 8 hours of dripping, I had less
than 1 bowl, which doesn't seem to explain enough water loss to justify
the 15 or so lbs I was down.
It does suggest, however, if 1 drop of water every 6-7 seconds equals
less than one bowl, that I must have a leak of over one drop per second
to lose 20 lbs in 8 hours. That's quite a leak, and it seems so
unlikely. None of the visible connections leak, and the same technique
was used on all of them, but I guess a bad connection is possible even
though I've torqued 'em all down twice. So is a DOA footvalve.
How the heck can I test the well system when it's stretched out across
the lawn? It's obviously wet when I pull it out, and since while it's
on the lawn I don't have any water I can't pressurize it.
Is it time for a pro? Can THEY test the entire system between the pump
and the footvalve, to prove that indeed there is a leak out there
someplace without me having to dig up the new grass a third time??
Edd the frustrated
|
58.759 | Check valve ? | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Fri Sep 24 1993 10:47 | 6 |
|
I'm not familiar with wells, but it seems like you've covered all
bases except for actually looking at the footvalve under pressure.
Could it be the culprit?
Fred
|
58.760 | | MANTHN::EDD | Look out fellas, it's shredding time... | Fri Sep 24 1993 11:10 | 7 |
| It could be the culprit, but it *is* new (DOA?), and I suspect
increased pressure caused by the weight of the water column and
the inherent pressure in the system would cause it to close tighter.
The pipe could have a crack also, I suppose...
Edd
|
58.252 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Fri Sep 24 1993 11:19 | 15 |
| We have some fine sediment that is found only in our hot water. It
get's trapped by the screen on the washing machine hose. Since both
the hot and cold inlets have the same screen, I assume both would catch
the sediment but it only shows up on the hot. We called a plumber and
he said that it is coming from the well but it only shows up in the hot
water because the hot water causes particles that are too small to be
trapped by the screen to join together into larger particles that are
trapped. He said the only thing to do is put a filter on the water
coming from the well.
Does this explanation sound reasonable? I wondered if there might be
something wrong with the boiler (We have a tankless system heated by
oil) but the plumber said that was not it. Any comments appreciated.
John
|
58.253 | | CADSYS::FLEECE::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Fri Sep 24 1993 11:46 | 7 |
| We had the opposite problem, particles blocking the washing machine cold water
inlet. We put a sediment filter on the cold water line a few weeks ago.
This line also feeds the hot water tank. In your case, you might want to
read up on water heaters in this file, and decide if you want to flush the
water heater.
Elaine
|
58.761 | Just curious... | GNPIKE::SMITH | Peter H. Smith,297-6345,TSEG/DECfbe | Fri Sep 24 1993 17:40 | 5 |
| I'm confused. The last well I had had a check valve at the tank, and I
was under the impression that the pump (submerged) and feed line to the
tank were only under pressure when the pump was running. So any pressure
loss would happen at the tank or farther down the line. Is your check
valve really back at the pump? Is this for priming purposes?
|
58.762 | One more thing (maybe) | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Sun Sep 26 1993 08:26 | 14 |
|
As I said, I'm not familiar with well pumps but just finished
rebuilding one of the big hotwater supply pumps to the bldg
here and I thought of you while putting the shaft seal in.
Is it possible the pumps shaft seal is leaking?
Now then, I'm assuming that when you mentioned "foot valve"
that it's on the suction side of the pump down underground
and underwater. Once the pressure limit switch is satisfied
up at the tank, it shuts off the pump and presure is maintained
from the top of this foot valve to the fawcetts. Right?
Fred
|
58.763 | | MANTHN::EDD | Look out fellas, it's shredding time... | Mon Sep 27 1993 09:03 | 28 |
| My pump is in the cellar, with 2 lines running to what I believe is
called a "jet" located deep in the well. The foot valve is on a third
connection to the jet.
When the pump comes on, it sends water back down into the well, where
magic happens and I get more water back than I sent down. (I'm
considering filling the pump with money.) The "extra" water that comes
up is what I get to keep.
When operating properly, the entire system from foot valve to kitchen
faucet, is under constant pressure.
I did more investigating this weekend, and it may not be as bad as I
imagined. There's a small leak (1 drop every 6-7 seconds) in the
captive air tank, and it loses it's pre-charge in less than 3 weeks.
This tells me I have a leak in the bladder.
I was under the impression that the bladder held air. I've been told that
it actually holds water, and the captive air is "loose" in the tank.
Since my leak is occuring at the connection on the tank, I must have
water in the space the air is supposed to occupy, and further suspect
I'm letting some air out of the tank into the general plumbing...
It's been close to 10 years. A new tank ($109 at Somerville, $199 at
HQ) won't be a bad investment even if it doesn't account for all of the
problem...
Edd
|
58.254 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Mon Sep 27 1993 11:50 | 3 |
| What type of filter did you put on? How much did it cost?
John
|
58.255 | From an amateur plumber | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Mon Sep 27 1993 13:02 | 16 |
| To .14
I beg to differ with your plumber.
I bet one of two things.
1. You have a 'tankless heater', i.e. a series of coils in a gas or oil
furnace which has a small reservoir and makes hot water when it is
called for
2. You have a fairly old conventional hot water heater
Those are not 'sediment particles who have decided to get together'.
They are rust flakes from '1' or '2' above. Either your coil in the
furnace or your tank is corroding.
I'll betcha
|
58.256 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Mon Sep 27 1993 13:59 | 13 |
| I agree with your plumber, John. In a tankless system, you have a
copper coil in your boiler that the water goes through, picking up heat
as it does. The heat *does* cause any dissolved minerals in the water
to scale onto the pipe and also simply to clump together and fall out
of suspension. Some stick to the pipes, some ride along with the water
as it goes. Any that are big enough, get caught on that screen.
I don't know that a filter will help you all, unless you put it on
the *outlet* of the hot water. Since the minerals are *dissolved* in
the cold water, I doubt the filter even *could* trap the dissolved
minerals.
Kenny
|
58.257 | slight modification to diagnosis | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Mon Sep 27 1993 16:08 | 13 |
| In reading .17 and .18, I will modify my comments somewhat. In the
tankless system, the minerals in the water, under the urging of the
heat, will accumulate and corrode the copper. What you are seeing on
the filter is a combination of the scale which is now flaking off the
pipes, and corroded copper. Same logic would apply to a hot water tank,
though I suspect that as there is less surface per volume of water, it
would accumulate less.
A filter outboard of the hot water system would trap it, but do not
forget the fact that, particularly on a tankless system, this stuff
will continue to build. Until it severely restricts water flow.
I've been there
|
58.764 | well! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Sep 28 1993 07:36 | 6 |
|
Geeeeee Edd. Let me know if the money trick works!
I"ll scrap the wishing well!!!!!!
|
58.258 | seen that before | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Sep 28 1993 08:19 | 15 |
|
I have the same problem. The pump has the whole house paper
filter. The HW tank is gas fired and it only a year old. Due
to a good amount of iron in the water. The filter cartridge turns
redish and I need to change it (if not anything but for looks, yuk!)
at least every 2 months. I tried a carbon filter but the change
cycle went to every 3 weeks!
If the hot water sits for a day, you can see it when the tap is first
turned on. After that its gone. The cold water seem ok. You can
turn the water on all day, but only if it sit you notice it......
Guess i'll have to install a treatment system some day...
JD
|
58.259 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Fri Oct 01 1993 13:31 | 6 |
| It is a tankless hot water system. The water is not all that hard so
I'm surprised that this is a problem. Any suggestions on filters that
would help here and some idea how much it might cost. Or would a
filter help at all?
John
|
58.260 | Filter after if you want. | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Tue Oct 05 1993 21:13 | 12 |
|
It depends on whether your particles are dissolved in the water or
not. You say you are not getting it in the cold water, so it is fair to
assume that it is the heat that is causing *dissovled* minerals to
precipitate. You can filter *after* the heater to get those out and
that's fine, but you need to realize that some of those minerals will
be scaling up your tankless coils. You could install equipment to
remove the dissolved minerals to stop that, but it would cost you more
than a new tankless coil. The minerals will only shorten its life some,
likely not that bad.
Kenny
|
58.261 | | CADSYS::FLEECE::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Wed Oct 06 1993 10:09 | 5 |
| You might want to consider having a thorough test of your well water by an
independent testing lab. If your water is hard and you don't know it, you may
see the problems described.
Elaine
|
58.262 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Wed Oct 06 1993 13:15 | 15 |
| We did have the water tested before we bought the house and the water
was moderately hard. I don't have the numbers with me now but the
impression I was given is that it was not really enough to warrant a
water softener. We have arsenic in our water so we have an R.O. filter
and we are still getting decent output on it after 5 months. When I
bought it, I was warned that high mineral content might significantly
reduce the life of the filters and cut down on the water output but I
haven't noticed this yet.
I think I'll try just adding a filter on the hot water feed to the
washer and see how that works for a while. At least it will be easier
to clean/replace than the screen inside the washer. Thanks for the
information.
John
|
58.263 | hot subject | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Oct 07 1993 08:26 | 12 |
|
Hard water does not always mean rust....and not to be confused with
a "water softener". I have soft water, but a high iron content.
So my water softener system would have to be tailered to remove iron.
Before you place a filter on the HW side, check to see if the filter
housing will take the HW temp. With the addition of Hot water and
pressure, the plastic housing may fail causing a fracture and creating
a swiming pool in your celler.....
JD
|
58.910 | 48 kilowatt hours per day....... | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Fri Oct 15 1993 00:13 | 52 |
|
1st - Home_Work: the notes conference no home owner should be without!
2nd - My wife and I moved into our 'new' (33 years old) house in Sutton
just over a month ago (Sep. 4th) and got our first Mass Electric bill today
and almost blew a fuse! over 1400 kilowatt hours! 48 kilowatt hours PER DAY!!
I turned off all the appliances in the house, checked the meter and it was
going round-n-round to beat the band! Only drain I could figure was the well
pump so I threw the pump circuit breakers and 'presto' - the meter was going at
a "normal" (ie: slow) pace......................
Of to this conference I go and end up in this note............. check the
relay and sure enough it's closed even though no water's being run. I open
it manually and it stays open... I close it manually and it stays closed...
Sound Familiar???
Now here's the question - in a round about way................
It's a "Square D" relay labeled "30 On 50 Off". Inside there are what I
would call two joined relays with a total of four contacts (disengage one
disengage all) and behind the relay there are two springs - adjustable.
One spring is much smaller than the other and only makes contact with the
?pressure plate? when the pressure is "high" (the contacts should open).
The other spring is larger and in contact with the plate all the time.
By backing the tension OFF of the larger spring I was able to get the contacts
to open when the pressure came up. They close when the tap is left open a
minute or so and the pressure drops............
Question - Have I done the right thing so far? What properties of the relay
are governed by which spring? ie: low limit / high limit - switch on /
switch off............
I'll know more whether or not I've "done the right thing" in the morning when
I, my wife, and our daughter take showers.............
also - thanks to ALL who participate in this conference. There's a real wealth
of information here............
---
Joe Whittemore - From where the Westfield
Meets the Westfield
By the Westfield
In Huntington, MA. [in SPIRIT anyway.....]
busy::jwhittemore
[email protected]
|
58.911 | ex | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Fri Oct 15 1993 08:32 | 17 |
|
Joe,
First I would check to see if your neighbors have extention cords
puged into your outside outlets!!!!..:) Now turn the electric heat
off!!!!! I dont think I use that much juice in a month, not to say
in a day!!!!!
Ok, First, do you have a pressure gage on your pump. If not, install
one. Then adjust your cut off/on points to that. Some say 30/60.
Mine is about 20/50. The pump should not run unless water is running.
If the pump comes on all the time and your pressure cant be adjusted.
You might find that you pump is on the way out. I had this problem
with the old pump. Replace it. Tuned it up and no problems........
Hope this get you started
JD
|
58.912 | | MANTHN::EDD | Look out fellas, it's shredding time... | Fri Oct 15 1993 12:45 | 15 |
| I think Joe's already discovered he has a pressure switch, and that
it's been malfunctioning.
30/50 is the lower/upper turnon/turnoff points for the switch. When
your pressure drops to 30 lbs, the switch closes and the pump attempts
to bring it up to 50, at which point it shuts off.
They're a cheap ($10-15) item, so if I had one malfunction, I'd just
swap it out for a new one.
BTW - Everyone I know rags on me about my pump in the cellar. "Get a
submergible, you NEVER hear them...". Your story is exactly why I
don't.
Edd
|
58.913 | 10-15$ Trio to spags (might be your cheapest!) | USCTR1::BJORGENSEN | | Fri Oct 15 1993 16:21 | 5 |
| Go to Spags and spend 10-15$ on a new switch unit. It's about a
1hr or less job. Same thing happened to me - but mine didn't come
on! It's a bit less costly :*).
-BDJ
|
58.914 | red light is parallel .... | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Sun Oct 17 1993 02:27 | 12 |
| >
> BTW - Everyone I know rags on me about my pump in the cellar. "Get a
> submergible, you NEVER hear them...". Your story is exactly why I
> don't.
>
I have to take my p.switch cover off to check the state of the contacts. I'd
like to connect a low wattage red lamp bulb in parallel with the output line.
Any suggestions and/or advice? This will give me a quick visual indicator.
-jw
|
58.915 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Mon Oct 18 1993 09:26 | 7 |
|
Sure, get a neon bulb from Radio Shack that's set up for 120 volts.
(As opposed to a raw bulb - a neon bulb needs a resistor to run at 120
volts) They are only about 3 watts and will be perfect for an
indicator.
Kenny
|
58.916 | 2 Pipes from Well? | USDEV::BSERVEY | Bill Servey | Mon Oct 18 1993 14:04 | 21 |
| I temporarily fixed my Mother-in-law's pump this weekend - it wasn't
tripping the pump cut in. Her pressure would go to 0, then after 10 or
more minutes, the pump would "wake up" and turn on. I did not witness
this "sleeping", but did fiddle with the high set / low set to acheive
30 / 45. I stopped at 45 for the cut-out because the pump was taking
more than 5 minutes to go from 40psi to just below 50.
I am curious about her pump config. This is an old 1/2HP Goulds. The
pump has two 2" tubes that go out through the cellar wall into the
ground. My M-I-L says that it is servicing an old artesian deep well.
Why are there two pipes connecting to the pump?
I not confused with the service-to-house lne - this comes
comes out of the top of the pump. I have a 3/4HP Gould shallow pump
that looks identical, excpet it has only one pipe in from my point
well.
Are two pipes from the well standard for a artesian deep well? If so,
shouldn't achieving 50psi not be as hard for the pump?
Thanks
|
58.917 | | MANTHN::EDD | Look out fellas, it's shredding time... | Mon Oct 18 1993 14:08 | 11 |
| My pump also has 2 pipes running out to the well. One is a tad smaller
than the other.
By pumping water back INTO the well, you can cause magic to happen
deep within the bowels of the earth and actually get back MORE water
than you sent down. (Nope, haven't tried the money trick yet...)
I don't have a clue as to why this works, but the 2 pipe arrangement
seems entirely normal.
Edd
|
58.918 | could be a simple fix | ROBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Mon Oct 18 1993 16:58 | 17 |
| I think that's called an injector-type system. It's common with deep
wells. I think the Venturi principle gets involved.
I had a problem similar to this, with an interesting solution. The
pressure switch in the cellar was mounted on a short (4" or so) section
of 1/4" or 3/8" ID galvanized pipe. This pipe was threaded into a brass
check valve. The little galvanized pipe was completely blocked with rust
and scale, preventing a dynamic fluctuation of actual line pressure to
the controller, thus preventing proper operation of the pump motor. I
replaced the piece of pipe and it fixed the problem.
I had envisioned pulling the injector/footvalve assembly and submersible
pump from the depths of the earth, and was ecstatic that the solution was
so simple.
Art
|
58.919 | ==> WIRED <== | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Wed Oct 20 1993 22:59 | 25 |
| Re: .83
>
>I have to take my p.switch cover off to check the state of the contacts. I'd
>like to connect a low wattage red lamp bulb in parallel with the output line.
>
>Any suggestions and/or advice? This will give me a quick visual indicator.
>
>-jw
>
I just picked up a circuit tester from Bradlees for ~ $2.25
It's one of those little neon lamps in a plastic housing with two wires each
ending with a pin-probe. You stick it into the wall outlets and if there's
juice the lamp lights up. 90 to 300 volt 3 watt
I'll screw the two leads under the output lugs of my pressure switch/relay
and have the lamp-n-plastic housing on the outside of the relay cover.
Visual indicator - clean-quick-n-neat for $2.25 + labor :)
Now the question becomes ....... how many hours are in this little neon?????
-jw
|
58.920 | Accuracy? | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Thu Oct 21 1993 08:19 | 4 |
|
Does the system have a pressure guage on the discharge
side of the pump? If so, is it accurate? Do the settings
on the control correspond to the guage?
|
58.921 | ....... but it works | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Thu Oct 21 1993 12:32 | 13 |
| >
> Does the system have a pressure gauge on the discharge
> side of the pump? If so, is it accurate? Do the settings
> on the control correspond to the gauge?
>
If you're asking me about my installation;
Yes there's a p.gauge
The relay (control) adjustments are not calibrated in any way
-jw
|
58.806 | Pump starts with a bang | WRKSYS::THOMAS | Stop, Look and Listen | Sun Oct 24 1993 17:20 | 8 |
| When our pump comes on we hear bang from the storage tank. It appears
that a vacuum is occuring behind the check valve when the pump has been
off for a while. I am assuming that their is also a check valve on the
submersible pump which has failed allowing the water column in the pipe
to fall and drawing a vacuum. When the pump turns on, this vacuum is
aleviated resuting in a bang when the water hits the check valve inside
the house. I am reluctant to go to the expense of pulling the pump.
What are the risks of just ignoring it?
|
58.807 | big drip | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon Oct 25 1993 07:06 | 9 |
|
Ohhhhh..... you might have to hear the bang all the time.
Higher electric bill because the pump is turned on more which
might tend to shorten the live of the pump which will cost you
more in the long run.....
sometimes their is just no "easy" way to spell Ou$$$$ch! :)
JD
|
58.231 | Does a Softener affect PH | WONDER::BURNS | | Wed Oct 27 1993 13:27 | 8 |
| I'm looking into putting a water softener in my house. We have iron
staining and mildly hard water. Skillings and Sons wants $1700 for
a sediment filter,softener, and installation. A SEARS unit would cost
$500. Skillings claims that his unit will not affect the PH of the
water while the SEARS unit will make the water more acidic. Has anyone
looked at what affect a water softener had on their PH?
Doug
|
58.232 | | MVDS00::GOETZ | | Wed Oct 27 1993 13:53 | 5 |
| A water softener by itself should not affect the pH of the water. If
you have low pH (acid), and add an acid neutralizer, that will
typically increase the hardness of the water.
|
58.325 | ex | TFH::SHANK | | Fri Nov 12 1993 12:19 | 15 |
| Hi,
We've been talking to a water purification company about lowering
the radon level in our well water. He recommended a whole-house
carbon filter, which I understand is not the best solution but a
lot cheaper than aeration. He recommended changing the filter
every 6 months and hanging the old filter outside in a bag. When
it's time to change filters again, throw the bagged one out. We
have a big enough yard that we could hang it out the way and it
seems like a reasonable way to handle the filter disposal problem.
Anyone ever hear a similar recommendation or have an opinion on this?
Thanks,
Lisa
|
58.326 | Radon Gas+Charcoal Filter=Radioactive waste | MVDS00::GOETZ | | Fri Nov 12 1993 12:57 | 8 |
| Just remember...
After that charcoal filter has been exposed to the Radon Gas in the
water, it becomes radioactive. You can't (legally) throw them in the
trash. Low level radioactive waste must be handled by a licensed
waste hauler and placed in special disposal areas.
|
58.765 | right steps for recharge,replace gauge & reset range? | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:40 | 52 |
|
I read through all the replies here and the ones on recharging the air
pocket were helpful. I need to recharge my tank since water came
spurting out the air valve (located at 7/8 of the tank height) when I
tried to check the tank pressure. I'm left with some questions though:
1) How can you tell if your tank has a bladder or diaphragm? My tank is
colored blue and has the manufacture label "STATE tank - Neptune". If
it is a bladder system and water came out the air valve, what now? Is
having a broken diaphragm bad - I now have a regular non-bladder
system, right, simply recharge and relax?
2) I had refilled the tank with air maybe a year ago when I had access
to an air compressor. I didn't notice water coming out the valve then,
there must not have been water that high before. Is it common to lose
so much air in a year, or does this indicate a leak somewhere?
3) The pressure gauge on the tank's incoming well-pipe has always read
40-60 psi. I thought 40 psi was just low pressure. Turns out the
pressure gauge works but is off exactly 22 psi. Our actual pressure
range is 18 to 38 psi, explaining the poor water pressure. How can a
gauge work but be off 22 psi evenly across the range? Well, I have a
new gauge anyway. Now - how do I install it? Drain the tank first and
simply screw it in using teflon tape I imagine?
4) I'm guessing that the person adjusting the pressure turn on/off
screws (haven't looked at them yet but am hoping I can do this myself)
simply went by the faulty gauge (which must have been faulty then too)
and set the range to 40-60 on that gauge. I'm hoping they didn't have
the pressure set at 18-38 for a reason, like a leak. Anything I should
be checking on particularly when I raise the pressure range? Besides
eyeing the plaster warily....
So --- I'm expecting to have to:
a) Turn power to pump off.
b) Open the faucets upstairs, letting all the water out that comes out
and leave them open.
c) Drain ALL the water out of the tank from the bottom spigot, allowing
the tank to fill with air. Any danger of air causing (new) leaks?
d) Replace the pressure gauge located at 1/8 the tank height with the
new one.
e) The tank is filled with all air and no water. Close off faucet.
f) Turn power to pump on, allowing tank to fill with water
g) Let some air out??? How can you judge the air/water level?
h) Adjust the high and low pressure screws.
i) rejoice in the improved water pressure!
Apart from not knowing how to tell where the water level is inside the
pressure tank, I should be OK. The tank should be 2/3 full of water at
the max pressure, right? Any other tips or hints?
-Erik neophyte plumber
|
58.766 | has anyone ever done this before? | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | | Fri Jan 21 1994 10:17 | 25 |
|
No input on -1?
I'm hoping to recharge my tank this weekend but need some pointers.
How can you tell if your tank has a bladder? Do most not?
Should I have had water coming out of the air valve near the top of the
tank? Is this bad, or just waterlogged?
Will draining all the water out of a tank to let air in result in new
leaks, or is this a suburban legend only?
Are there any tricks to re-setting the high and low pressure set
points, or is it simply trial and error by adjusting the screws in a
direction and seeing what happens?
I need to do something about the water system this weekend so help
today would be very useful. I am wary of working on the system in this
cold weather, and want to lessen my chances of screwing something up if
this isn't as straight-forward as it seems.
Any input would be appreciated...
-Erik
|
58.767 | Have the number of a well pump repairemperson | KENT::KENT | Peter Kent, UNIX Systems Marketing, DTN 223-8423 | Sun Jan 23 1994 11:29 | 54 |
| It sounds like you have a torn rubber bladder in the tank. It needs to
be replaced, particularly if you notice the following: When the pump
cycles, if it takes almost no time at all - 2 or 3 seconds - for it to
reach the pressure upper limit, then the pump is cycling on and off too
quickly. The purpose of the captive air tank is to store water
pressure (much as a capacitor stores charge) to prevent this quick
cycling from happening. The rapid on and off will more quickly burn
out the pump.
The pressure switch usually has its instructions on the inside of the
cover. On mine, the small screw is for the turn off (cut out) point
and is called the differential adjustment. The larger screw is for the
turn on point (cut in) of the pump. The manufacturer is Square D. Be
careful around the switch if you have power on - pumps are usually
220 volts. It's a good idea to turn it off before making adjustments.
Having a tool blow up in your face because of a short is a possibility.
The pump pressure on mine is set to cycle between 40 and 60 pounds.
The air pressure in the bladder is set by turning off the pump switch,
draining down the captive air tank to zero pressure, and then setting
the air pressure to 38 pounds - 2 pounds under the turn on pressure of
the pump. These instructions were given to me by a well pump
installer.
The installation of a new guage should be fairly straightforward, as
long as Murphy doesn't step in. You remove pressure from the line,
unscrew the old one, put teflon tape on the threads of the new one and
screw it in.
Once everything is working correctly (and I think your captive air tank
needs replacement from the sound of it) the pump should take about 20
seconds to shut off if no one is using the water and the pump is
reasonably sized for the depth of your well. Make sure it does shut
off (I put a 220 volt neon light on mine to monitor once in a while).
If the pump doesn't shut off, you've got problems: Either you have a
weak pump, or you have a break in the line between the house and the
pump, or worst of all, you have low water level in the well. The
beginning of my sorrows was that the pump never shut off. Lots of
electricity useage and you don't notice it - there's no noise with a
pump 120 feet in the ground.
I've been through all the above scenarios except the low water level -
knock on wood.
If it all gets away from you, try Need Pump in Sterling, Ma. They are
expensive but they do good work.
Replacing all of the above, except the pump, is well within the home
handyman capability. The pump is best left to the pros. If you drop
something down the well (such as a pipe or a tool) it is a riot to fish
it out again.
Good luck,
Peter
|
58.768 | | MANTHN::EDD | Leggo my ego... | Mon Jan 24 1994 10:30 | 22 |
| re: bladder vs. diaphragm...
My old tank had a diaphragm, the new one has a bladder. I noticed
the old tank would "sweat" completely around the circumference, while
the new one only sweats on one side, probably the one the bladder leans
against...(?)
Anyhow, if water is coming out the valve, it (the water) got past
whatever method is used to pre-charge the tank, so you should swap
out the tank. No big deal. $150. 1 hour.
Dropping a tool down the well is no big deal. The footvalve doesn't
hit the bottom...
I've found the only hard part about playing with the well/pump system
is finding a leak in the well pipes. Mine STILL leak after digging them
up twice. Once they're outta the well there's no pressure to cause a
leak, or water to leak out. I built a couple adapters so I can charge
the system with air next spring (when I dig it up again) and do some
soapy water testing...
Edd
|
58.769 | Now have pressure, but where'd the air go?? | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | | Tue Jan 25 1994 13:22 | 77 |
|
I didn't receive any screams of "Don't do it!!" here Friday so I
ventured off to do the job on my own Saturday. It wasn't bad at all.
In fact it took less than 30 minutes. I drained the tank, let air fill
the vacuum, when the water level reached the half-way point where the
pressure gauge was, I installed the new gauge, let it refill with
water, and adjusted the pressure range to 36-64 psi (from previous
16-34) via the one adjustment screw system I have. Now it feels like
we have a geyser in the basement! :-) Big improvement already... the
showers seem incredible now.
-2,-1
> Anyhow, if water is coming out the valve, it (the water) got past
> whatever method is used to pre-charge the tank, so you should swap
> out the tank. No big deal. $150. 1 hour.
Do all tanks have either a bladder or a diaphragm? Won't the air stay
at the top of the tank even without one? There didn't seem to be any
kind of barrier between the air valve and water level as I drained it,
you know, I'd think you hear a dribble or something as the water on top
leaks back out the diaphragm hole? Maybe not.
You might be right about needing a new tank, because here's what
happened:
ww
ww ww
air valve XXww ww
ww ww
ww ww
ww ww
pressure gauge XXww ww
ww ww
ww ww
ww ww
water in --ww ww-- water out
------
My pressure gauge sits in a hole less than half-way from the bottom of
the tank. So above that was all air. I let the tank re-fill & fixed
the pressure. No problems. Then just to verify the recharge, I tested
the air valve which is 7/8 up the tank. Water came out again!!
I hoping that maybe this might not be a problem because...
> Once everything is working correctly (and I think your captive air tank
> needs replacement from the sound of it) the pump should take about 20
> seconds to shut off if no one is using the water and the pump is
> reasonably sized for the depth of your well.
..it takes a good 20 to 25 seconds for the pump to bring the pressure
from 36 to 64 psi in the tank. So the pump is not over-cycling it
seems. Am I alright? Do I _have_ to or is it wise to replace the tank
if I'm not cycling the pump constantly. The tank is about 5 ft high
and maybe 18 inches in diameter. A friend semi-familiar with water
tanks says he's never seen one with a pressure gauge stuck in the
middle of it. He suggested that maybe I have a AIR tank instead of a
water tank over the phone. That might explain not having a diaphragm.
Would the half-tank of air compress to less than 1/8 the tank under 60
psi? That might explain it. Otherwise where could all that air have
escaped to under 60 psi that the water also couldn't once the air was
gone?
This may or may not be related but when the pump runs and shuts off at
64 psi, during the next 30 seconds the pressure slowly drops 4 psi to
60 and then stays there. My friend suggested maybe it was a slow
working pressure valve that prevents the pressure from leaking back out
the input pipe (like a diode), that it just takes a little while to
finally seat. Otherwise the pressure stays at 60 psi, even overnight.
So I have pressure and the pump is not cycling: what should I do? Any
dangers in not doing anything and continuing to use the system as is?
-Erik
|
58.770 | Not all tanks | TLE::FRIDAY | DEC Fortran: a gem of a language | Tue Jan 25 1994 13:43 | 10 |
| re .92
>> Do all tanks have either a bladder or a diaphragm?
Not all tanks have them. Our tank had a bladder, but it
leaked. This happened more than once. Now all we have
is an air space above the water. We do have to pay attention
to how long it takes for the pump to cycle. About every
year I have to recharge the tank as the air dissolves in the
water.
|
58.771 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Jan 25 1994 14:13 | 12 |
| RE: .92
I'm not sure if its in this string or not, but there was an excellent
reply in here, about the correct way to recharge a water tank. The
method talked about adding air to have the tank air pressure equal the
desired water pressure. The method you used....letting the air in to
the tank, and then having the water compress the air....doesn't leave
as much air space as pumping in air.
Check the replies...in here somewhere.
Marc H.
|
58.772 | | MANTHN::EDD | Leggo my ego... | Wed Jan 26 1994 08:28 | 10 |
| 20 - 25 seconds seems far too short a duty cycle for a 20+ PSI
increase.
I've got a 1 HP pump and it takes a couple minutes, maybe as many as
5, to build up that much pressure.
A short duty cycle indicates too much water and not enough air in the
tank.
Edd
|
58.773 | | MANTHN::EDD | Leggo my ego... | Wed Jan 26 1994 08:31 | 13 |
| The correct way to pre-charge a tank is to completely drain it, and
then use a tire pump to bring the pressure up to the "cut in" (pump
on) pressure, minus 2 PSI.
ex: cut-in PSI 25
-2
---
23 PSI precharge
Shut the pump off. Turn on a faucet until you get no water. Adjust the
precharge. Turn the pump back on. Have a beer.
Edd
|
58.774 | hopefully my fill-up time will be 1 minute too... | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | | Wed Jan 26 1994 09:46 | 8 |
|
Wow. The replies were really helpful, thanks!
Sounds like all I have to do is pump air into the tank until I hit
the pump-on pressure. I'll give it a try...
-Erik
|
58.775 | Too much! | MANTHN::EDD | Leggo my ego... | Wed Jan 26 1994 10:13 | 5 |
| > until I hit the pump on pressure...
Then remove two PSI.
Edd
|
58.776 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jan 26 1994 10:18 | 5 |
| RE: .98
Why two pounds?
Marc H.
|
58.777 | | MANTHN::EDD | Leggo my ego... | Wed Jan 26 1994 10:48 | 10 |
| Dunno why 2 lbs, but you certainly want to keep the pre-charge pressure
BELOW the turn-on pressure. If it's above, the pump will never turn on.
2 lbs is probably more firmly rooted in "rule of thumb" than
hydraulics.
Getting the pre-charge up was essential to my getting the prime to
"catch" when I replaced the well innards. At 0 PSI, I couldn't build
pressure. Pre-charging to 22 got it to work first try...
Edd
|
58.778 | wouldn't have forgotten | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | | Wed Jan 26 1994 13:05 | 3 |
|
Yup, meant to say minus two pounds...
|
58.997 | Cost for new well? | CADSYS::CADSYS::CHAMPAGNE | | Mon Feb 28 1994 18:20 | 16 |
| I am in the process of trying to buy a summer home on Cape Cod.
The broker, in the true spirit of a "Sellers" broker, is
not really coming forward with a lot of information.
I just found out today that the house will need a new well. It
will need a new well because of the placement of the new septic
(Well, at least I knew that it needed a new septic).
Does anyone have any ball park figures about how much a new
well, with all its plumbing coming to the house, would cost?
Will I be looking at 3,000, 13,000 or 30,000? This could
stop me from signing the P&S. I will also be contacting
drilling contractors, but it would be nice if anyone could
tell me ahead of time what would be reasonable.
thanks,
georgette
|
58.998 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Tue Mar 01 1994 07:01 | 17 |
| It will depend upon a lot of things including your area, but -
11 years ago in New Hampshire, after looking at three competitive bids, I
selected a driller who charged $6.50/ft for drilling and $7.50/ft for
casing [casing is most definitely higher now and it will depend upon
the weight casing used as well]. They hit ledge at 55 ft. and 3GPM at 65 ft.
I asked them to keep going for another 100 ft. for a reservoir so my cost
for the drilling was ($14 x 55)+($6.50 x 100)=$1420. I installed the pump
and plumbing myself. Pump, pipe, wire and fittings were roughly $400. The
ditch for the pipe was done as part of the ongoing site work - maybe another
$100.
I would expect you need to go substantially deeper for ledge on the Cape,
though I could be wrong, but then again, besides all the variables, a lot
of things have changed in 11 years.
-Jack
|
58.999 | water isnt cheep! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Mar 01 1994 07:14 | 7 |
|
Dont quote me but I thing it better than $10/ft now.....
How about a desalinator(sp?) All the water and nothing to
drink! :)
JD
|
58.1000 | wells are easy on the Cape | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Tue Mar 01 1994 18:28 | 5 |
| The Cape is mostly sand. No problem drilling the well.
My SO's house needed a new well about a year ago.
Forget the price, but salt wasn't an issue either.
Dave.
|
58.1001 | got an estimate | CADSYS::CADSYS::CHAMPAGNE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 20:39 | 9 |
| Thanks for your help. I did find out some more information.
There really isn't any ledge on the cape, I guess it's mostly
one big sand dune. A drilling company estimated the cost to
be less than $3000, because what is considered a "deep" well
where the house is would be 50 feet. They had just put in
a 25 foot well on the same street last year. The location is
about 100 yards from salt water marshes, and .3 mile from the
ocean, so some sort of filtering mechanism for the salt would
be a healthy idea.
|
58.1002 | big dig | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Mar 02 1994 07:40 | 4 |
|
Drilling through sand isnt a problem. Its the well casing they
have to use before they find ledge that adds to the cost of the
well...
|
58.1003 | | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Wed Mar 02 1994 08:13 | 5 |
| Re. .4
I do not think the author of a few ago implied that finding ledge was
bad. For water, finding ledge is usually what you want to do, for it is
in the fissures and faults of that ledge that you find the clean water
you are after.
|
58.1004 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Mar 02 1994 13:30 | 11 |
| Yes - finding ledge is good because from thence it gets cheaper and that's
where you're going to find the water. I guess I fail to understand how
one sinks a well in sand alone. You need casing to seal anything but
ledge from refilling the well. However, if you did hit a vein of water
in the sand, the casing would seal that off as well. My understanding
has always been that if you haven't a likelihood of hitting ledge (such
as with a shallow well), then you need to go with a dug, rather than a
drilled well, such that the vein enters at the bottom with the reservoir
above it in a well with enclosed sides (such as in "Delores Claiborne". :^)
-Jack
|
58.1005 | Cape aquifer demands... | SMURF::WALTERS | | Wed Mar 02 1994 14:54 | 16 |
|
There was an article about the aquifer under the cape in the Boston
Globe a few months ago. If I remember correctly, the freshwater
is located underneath a band of salt water that runs from shore to
shore and "floats" on top of the freshwater. I'd imagine that any
well casings would have to pass through this saline layer to reach
fresh water. I think the article mentioned that increased drawing
from the aquifer was placing older, shallower wells at risk of ending
in slat water. Might be worth getting the advice of a geologist, and
going the extra x10 feet to "future proof" your investment.
As I said, this is from memory...
Colin
|
58.1006 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Mar 02 1994 15:24 | 6 |
| RE: .8
My parents on Cape Cod, installed a well about 15 feet below the
surface. Hit fresh water and use it to water the lawn and garden.
Marc H.
|
58.1007 | there's always to a way to lose | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Wed Mar 02 1994 17:39 | 15 |
| RE: wells in the sand
Yes, you use casing. The reason that we were re-drilling the well is
that the old steel casing had rusted out. Now they use plastic pipe
that will last for many more years. (forget the estimates) The well
man sees his repeat business already declining.
You drill the well deep enough so that sufficent water comes up from
the open bottom. You don't try for any side flow.
We didn't hit any areas of salt water. Your mileage will vary.
We're just thankful that we are not victims of the pollution seepage
from the AFB. (in Maspee)
Dave.
|
58.1008 | Plug the bottom and perforate? | UCLYPT::WATTS | | Thu Mar 03 1994 20:42 | 20 |
|
I don't have any experience drilling for domestic water in the north eastern
US, but when I was drilling for oil and water in the middle east and africa,
it was typical to line the well with steel casing, which is cemented into
place. This blocks the foot of the casing also, avoiding bleed contamination.
Access to the acquifer, or oil bearing layer, is achieved by perforating the
casing at the required depth. And you only get the good oil or water, as the
case may be.
When I drilled the well to water the garden, through sand, we hit fresh water
at 22 metres, with salt water above and below. The well was lined with plastic
pipe with a section of plastic "mesh pipe" about 400 mm long glued in at the
required depth, with the bottom plugged. Every 18 months or so we scour out
the loose sand in the bottom of the well, and have had no trouble with salt
water contamination
regards,
Michael Watts.
|
58.1009 | Unsafe well pumps ? | TOOK::FINAN | Tim Finan, LKG1-3/A11, DTN 226-7607 | Wed Apr 20 1994 10:16 | 12 |
|
Did anyone catch the story on the news last night
(boston, ch 5) about unsafe well pumps ? Apparently
the EPA issued some sort of warning about certain
pumps that may cause lead contamination. They listed
a few specific pumps to watch out for, but I missed
it because I was in the other room.
Does anyone have any more on this ? I did not see
anything about it in this mornings Globe ?
-tim
|
58.1010 | | WRKSYS::MORONEY | | Wed Apr 20 1994 10:45 | 6 |
| I think it was a couple days ago, but the drift I got was, if it's a brass
pump body and the pump is less than a year old, get your water tested for
lead. If it's not brass you're OK. If it's brass and over a year old any lead
will already have leached out (the damage has been done I guess)
-Mike
|
58.1011 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Apr 20 1994 12:14 | 3 |
| If brass contains copper and zinc...where does the lead come from?
Marc H.
|
58.1012 | | WRKSYS::MORONEY | | Wed Apr 20 1994 12:25 | 9 |
| re .2:
I don't know where the lead is supposed to come from. Either they used a
brass alloy that also contains lead, the copper/zinc were contaminated,
lead-bearing solder was used in the pump somewhere or the news media managed
to get the story wrong. .1 is what was reported on the news, that's all I
know.
-Mike
|
58.1013 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Apr 20 1994 12:53 | 6 |
| Most brass used in plumbing fixtures contain some amount of lead in the
alloy; it makes it easier to form into various shapes. There was a flurry
of news items a short while ago about faucets in particular which could
allow lead to leach out of the brass.
Steve
|
58.1014 | small article in Herald | ECADJR::WILLIAMS | | Wed Apr 20 1994 15:39 | 16 |
|
This doesn't really offer any additional information, but this is
the small article which appeared in yesterday's Herald about this.
'Brass pump warning issued'
Washington - Americans who have installed new brass pumps in water
wells within the last year are being urged to drink bottled water
until their wells are tested for lead. The Enviornmental Protection
Agency issued the warning yesterday, saying that lead used in making
the brass can leach into the water in potentially dangerous amounts.
-Susan
|
58.1015 | list of pumps | TOOK::FINAN | Tim Finan, LKG1-3/A11, DTN 226-7607 | Thu Apr 21 1994 11:11 | 11 |
|
There are 4 specific pumps that the EPA has issued
warning on:
- SE Myers Preditor II
- Aermotor LR5857
- Sta-rite 2000
- Gould 10EJ054 (although a well installer I spoke
with said it applies to ALL Gould pumps)
-tim
|
58.1016 | | QUIVER::DESMOND | | Thu Apr 21 1994 11:29 | 7 |
| Is this something that could start occurring at any time? I think our
pump was made by Gould but we had the water tested for lead when we
bought the house a year ago and there wasn't any. The house was new.
Is it something that needs to be tested periodically or is once enough?
John
|
58.1017 | | TOOK::FINAN | Tim Finan, LKG1-3/A11, DTN 226-7607 | Thu Apr 21 1994 12:07 | 15 |
|
I would say call the company who installed the well (or
the builder). I just had a well drilled, but they have
not put the pump in yet (great timing !). I called the
installer last night and he said that they *had* intended
on putting a Gould pump in there, but now they will put a
stainless steel one in from someone else.
He also said that (understandably) all the well companies
in the area are very concerned and they are getting together
to try to pressure Gould into "doing something" (whatever
that means ). I would definitely call, maybe you can get
a new pump out of the deal !
-tim
|
58.1020 | Wells and Lawn Care | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Thu May 05 1994 09:13 | 18 |
| I checked through all the well related notes and didn't find this
addressed.
We've just purchased a new home and now own a well. We also now own a
lawn that is in need of some help. Normally I'd grab the spreader and the lime
and the fertilizer with insect control and the ferilizer and ......etc, etc.
But, now that we have a well I'm concerned that the lawn treatments could
affect the purity of the well. The well is 113 feet deep. What precautions
need to be taken with lawn care to assure that the well stays unaffected? When
applying lawn treatments should you stay a recommended number of feet away
from the wellhead?
Now that I think about it, are there also concerns with a septic system
and leach field and lawn chemicals?
Thanks,
George
|
58.1021 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Thu May 05 1994 09:29 | 16 |
| My solution to the problem is to let the lawn fend for itself, but
if you feel compelled to do something, here are my judgement calls:
lime - no problem. It's just ground-up rock anyway.
fertilizer - potential problem if it's overdone. I'd go light on
the fertilizer in any one application, putting on no more than
the lawn can really use.
Weed/insect/whatever killers - None, ever. Regardless of how fast the
stuff allegedly breaks down into "harmless components," I don't
want to have anything to do with it. I read several years ago
that under certain conditions of cold, damp, lack of sunlight,
etc. (like underground!) some poisons take MUCH longer to break
down than claimed.
|
58.1022 | | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Thu May 05 1994 10:00 | 21 |
| The major thing which will keep your well pure is the construction of
the well itself. The well has two components - the top part, shich is a
hole through the top X feet of dirt, sand, miscellaneous stuff. That
part will be encased in a pipe. The purpose of the pipe is to keep
stuff which is on the outside of the pipe -surface water, septic water,
and general water table - from getting to the inside of the pipe.
Anyway, that pipe goes down into bedrock, at which point the pipe
stops. From there down, your 'pipe' is a hole cut through the bedrock.
Serves the same purpose as the pipe.
Septic systems are, by code, located a certain distance away from water
supply.
If I were you, I wouldn't worry about it. Not to say that the use of
fertilizers, chemicals, and other stuff should be indiscriminate. The
real concern with these chemicals is surface run-off (where do they go
after they leave your lawn area) not well pollution. That's why lots of
ponds and lakes surrounded by lawn-bearing homes have a problem with
excess nitrogen, which encourages the growth of weeds and grasses,
which eventually clogs the lake. And, removes oxygen from the lake.
Which eventually removes the fish from the lake.
|
58.1023 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Thu May 05 1994 12:06 | 19 |
| re: septic and leech field damage
Your Septic system (i.e. from the waste exit to the septic tank up to, but
not including, the distribution box of your leech field) should be a closed
system not impervious to anything from the surrounding ground. The only
concerns ought to be, in any event, introducing anything that could kill
the bacteria within the tank. I guess some pesticides and herbicides could
do that. I suppose any fertilizers that got in could create an "environmental
hazard" for the bacteria as well. But, as I said, if it's constructed right,
it's a closed system and not an issue.
As far as the leech field goes, that's just a grey water drainange field.
It's not really going to be hurt by much. The danger there is loss of
porosity in the soil, such as from phosphate buildup coming from your
household grey water, or clogging of the piping by root systems. So if your
lawn care was encouraging deep, agressively rooted growth, that could
cause you some grief.
-Jack
|
58.1024 | | TLE::FELDMAN | Software Engineering Process Group | Thu May 05 1994 13:59 | 13 |
| re: .4
The leach field isn't as passive as you suggest. Bacteria
continue with the break down of material from the septic tank.
You'll frequently see pipes that are upside-down Js in large
leach fields (like for a school), intended to increase the
oxygen availability to the field, so that the bacteria can
do their thing.
Nevertheless, I've never heard of problems from proper use
of chemicals on a leach field. Don't overdo it.
Gary
|
58.1025 | Organic fertilizers good too | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Fri May 06 1994 12:37 | 5 |
| Organic lawn fertilizers are growing in available and acceptance,
driving the price down closer to chemical fertilizers. Just be sure
it's really "organic" since they'll call just about anything organic in
order to sell it. A nitrogen-rich mix typically uses lots of blood meal
or dried blood.
|
58.1026 | I'm waiting for 50# bags of BT for $18.99 | VMSSPT::STOA::CURTIS | Christos voskrese iz mertvych! | Tue May 10 1994 23:45 | 22 |
| Saw some organic lawn fertilizer at Home Depot in Nashua recently, and
one striking thing was that the "numbers" were something like 12-4-4
or maybe 8-4-4 -- a far cry from the usual stuff which tends to wildly
emphasize the nitrogen, like 22-4-3.
They also carry 50# bags of "Holly Food" -- acid fertilizer for
acid-lovers like holly, rhododendron and such (made by Hoffman). The
bag stated "contains organic material!" This piqued my curiosity, so
I checked the ingredients. The one thing that I noted wasn't organic
was muriate of potash, but all in all it sounded reasonable. Its NPK
content was 8-4-4 (might be shy a bit on the K).
But you're right about reading the labels. Grabbed some composted
manure, in a real rush, and while I noticed the bag looked different
(and was from a different company, I think) than some I'd gotten last
month, I didn't note that this was labelled "composted manure" where
the previous was labelled "composted cow manure" until I smelled it.
The label showed that where the bovine product was 1-1-1, this "blend
of horse manure and poultry manure" (that smell I recognized, urp!) was
only �-�-�.
Dick
|
58.1027 | Neighbor's new well too close for comfort | MUZICK::CHEN | | Mon May 23 1994 19:54 | 11 |
| My new neighbor is planning to drill a new well just ten feet away from
mine. Due to the location of another neighboring septic tank, he
has limited choice as to where to put the well.
I am worried that this might affect the quality and quantity of my well
production. If I can find convincing arguments, I might be able
to persude him to do certain things, such as changing his well depth or
try distancing the two wells as much as possible,
in order to avoid future water problem between us.
My well is artesian (I think), about 350 feet deep, located
Any advice will be greatly appreciated.
|
58.1028 | Check with your town | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue May 24 1994 08:26 | 11 |
|
You might check to see if his well is within the legal limits
of your town. Ex; 10' from property line.... As far as
the water goes. You might have problems if he's 100' feet
away. Anyone can tap into the same flow and also miss it
totally. The act of drilling can block up underwater streams
even in the preson putting in the well.
You might want to keep an eye on your water for sand, ect after...
Good luck
JD
|
58.1029 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Tue May 24 1994 14:27 | 6 |
| As long as both his well and yours are within the limits specified by your
local ordinances, I would doubt that there's anything that could legally be
done to restrict him. That's what the laws are for, afterall.
-Jack
|
58.1030 | well sharing? | NWD002::KASSJE | Just passing thru it | Wed May 25 1994 16:26 | 10 |
|
If your rate is good enough give your neighbor an opportunity to
share your well for a reasonable sum. It might provide him a
bargain in trouble and expense and provide you with a little cash.
I'm sharing my neighbors well for a few years by way of a water
agreement. I ran the pipe to my property and right by his
garden, ran a spigot for him and we called it even.
jeff
|
58.1031 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed May 25 1994 17:23 | 5 |
| RE: .3
Well Sharing works great until you want to sell your house.
Marc H.
|
58.1032 | exit | NWD002::KASSJE | Just passing thru it | Wed May 25 1994 18:51 | 13 |
|
In the case of selling your house, the well agreement should
be written to cover that contigency as well as what should
happen should the well ouput be reduced or dry up, expected
gallons of use, how the pump and tank maintenance should be
taken care of, if health department testing is needed how
that should be handled etc. Make it as reasonable as
possible for present and future. It doesnt seem to make sense
to put a hole in the ground right next to another hole in
the ground to access the same reservoir.
Jeff
|
58.1033 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu May 26 1994 11:15 | 11 |
| RE: .5
Maybe,
In my town, there is a nice, reasonably priced house that has been
on the market...forever it seems. The house shares a well with the
neighbor.
I would put the "holes" near each other....neighbors come and go
with no guaranty attached.
Marc H.
|
58.1018 | Lead in well water | CSC32::DUBOIS | Discrimination encourages violence | Mon Jun 20 1994 19:25 | 4 |
| Any updates on the well pump and lead situation? Anyone have their water
tested for lead? Has Gould done anything about this?
Carol
|
58.1019 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 20 1994 19:59 | 3 |
| The July "Consumer Reports" has a story on this.
Steve
|
58.398 | Water System Questions | CONSLT::DOWSE | | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:08 | 28 |
| I have a few questions concerning my water supply.
I have a well, a very large filtration system that removes iron by way
of adding air to oxidize the iron turning it to rust and then back
washing it out every couple of days.
Here are my questions and concerns: can the build up of the iron in the
pipes and filtration system be cleaned out somehow? Is there something
like "GUMOUT" but for removing iron from water pipes. My water pressure
has got to be affected by this. I removed the head off my filter last
night and it took me about 4 hours to scrape and scrub all the
components and valves clean of this orange crud. Is there a liquid I
could soak these parts in to speed the process?
I noticed the cap on my well was not screwed down tightly. The eight or
so bolts which hold it on are badly rusted so I am assuming the cap has
been loose for some time. I plan to cut the bolts off and tighten down
new ones but could this be another area for lost water pressure? Dose
this cap need to be sealed for the pump to work correctly?
Last but not least... I know there is air in the water tank which helps to control the water pressure from dropping so fast
when you turn on the faucet. How much air pressure and how do I measure
it to see if it isn't water logged? If it is do I call a plumber or is
it easy enough to fix myself. My pump cuts in at 40 PSI and off at 60.
Is this OK. It seams that when I first turn on the water it has good
pressure but it drops quickly within 15-20 seconds.
Any help would be great! Thanks in advance, Jim
|
58.779 | Utility/Sprinkler Pump? | 12GAGE::DERIE | Quis custodes ipsos custodiet? | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:07 | 10 |
|
I'm looking for suggestions on the best type of pump to use for
pumping water from a brook to run 2 or 3 lawn sprinklers. I see that
Northern Hyraulics has a few that may fit the bill. One being a 1hp
1632gph model that puts out ~68psi.
Does anyone have any experience with these types of pumps? Any good
suppliers in the the southern NH area?
Steve
|
58.399 | Some answers, as I see 'em | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:12 | 14 |
| The well cap has nothing to do with the water pressure, or lack
thereof. All it does is keep dirt out of the well.
You might try soaking the parts in vinegar to get rid of the
orange sludge. Dunno if it would work, but I think it might.
The air in the pressure tank just provides a compressible cushion
to buffer the on/off pump cycles, since water itself is incompressible.
15-20 seconds between full pressure and the pump coming on after
you open a faucet sounds about right. If the tank is "waterlogged"
(i.e. not enough air) the pressure will drop precipitously as soon
as you open a faucet and the pump will short-cycle (run for only
a couple of seconds before the pressure shoots up again).
|
58.400 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:25 | 59 |
| re: .0
> Here are my questions and concerns: can the build up of the iron in the
> pipes and filtration system be cleaned out somehow?
Something like "Iron-Away" should work relatively well on any plastic
components of the filtration system. I've even used it in the manganese
greensand of an iron filter.
> Is there something like "GUMOUT" but for removing iron from water pipes.
Again, Iron-Away will do some good, but by no means a "thorough job" of
cleaning your pipes.
> My water pressure has got to be affected by this.
If your pressure is actually reduced by buildup in the pipes, the only solution
is to replace them. PVC is the best bet for a system with heavy iron if you
can't eliminate it prior to the plumbing.
> Is there a liquid I could soak these parts in to speed the process?
Again, I'd try the Iron-Away. Put the components in a container with
the Iron-Away and add water to cover. Watch it - it'll bubble. And, do
it outside.
> could this be another area for lost water pressure?
A loose well cap shouldn't affect your pressure. That should be controlled
by your pump and pressure tank - virtually a closed system (relative to
the well casing, at least.)
> Dose this cap need to be sealed for the pump to work correctly?
Assuming it's either a submersed or a jet pump, the seal at the cap should
be immaterial. It's mainly a sanitary feature.
> How much air pressure and how do I measure it to see if it isn't water
> logged?
Most tanks can be measured with a standard tire guage. I'm not sure of the
optimum pressure, but a plumbing supply place that carries the brand you have
should be able to tell you.
> If it is do I call a plumber or is it easy enough to fix myself.
You should be able to bleed and/or repressurize the tank yourself (unless
you're verboten by one of those MA no-home-plumbing ordinances.)
> It seams that when I first turn on the water it has good
> pressure but it drops quickly within 15-20 seconds.
If the pump keeps coming back on in very short cycles, the system is most likely
waterlogged. Alternatively, the pressure switch could have gotten out of
adjustment.
There's a first cut, anyway.
-Jack
|
58.780 | | LEEL::LINDQUIST | | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:31 | 47 |
| �� <<< Note 2259.102 by 12GAGE::DERIE "Quis custodes ipsos custodiet?" >>>
�� -< Utility/Sprinkler Pump? >-
��
�� I'm looking for suggestions on the best type of pump to use for
�� pumping water from a brook to run 2 or 3 lawn sprinklers. I see that
�� Northern Hyraulics has a few that may fit the bill. One being a 1hp
�� 1632gph model that puts out ~68psi.
I water my lawn from the mighty Nissitissit river (really
just a stream).
I had a 3.5hp gas homelite pump from NorthernHydraulics. It
lasted a single season. It was made with a total-junk
Briggs&Stratton engine, both the block and head were just
aluminum. There was so much wear around the valve guides
after one summer of use, that the engine was not salaveable.
You could wiggle the exhaust valve about 3/8 of an inch,
side-to-side.
The Briggs&Stratton engines might be ok for an hour/week
of light duty lawn mowing, but certainly not up to the
constant load of a pump. Possibly their
"Industrial/Commercial" engines are better, but I never
calmed down enough to ever want to give Briggs&Stratton money
again.
I currently use a regular 3/4 hp well pump set up as a
shallow well. Works great.
The gas pump was noisy and more work. I had to walk down to
the river to start it, it would only run for an hour or so on
a tank of gas, and it was noisy. If you have neighbors near
by, they may not appreciate it. My lawn is 30-40' above the
river level. The homelite pump wouldn't start against that
pressure head. The engine would run, but nothing would
happen. (Well, not nothing, the water in the pump housing
would get hot.) I had to bleed the water off, down to the
pump, to get it started, then it would pump to the required
height with no problem.
The electric pump is nice, in that I can flip it on and off
from inside the house. It's quiet, and it starts against a
pressure head. But, it was a lot harder to set up.
Also, watch those gallon-per-hour claims. Your water mileage
may vary, particularly if you have to raise the water, and
with the size of pipe you use.
|
58.404 | Sulfur smell in water | WRKSYS::DEMERS | | Tue Jun 21 1994 19:14 | 16 |
| I have a new well in a new house. Water recently tested and all looks good. Water is softened due to high iron
and manganese content - and I have a SMELL!
Seems only to be upstairs and after the water has been off for awhile. Best example is that the smell is there
when the water is turned on first thing in the morning for brushing, etc. It only lasts a second and then all is
well. Can't seem to get the smell downstairs.
Any ideas? I was thinking that a gas was finding the high spot in the plumbing. Any chance there's a reaction
with minerals and the water softener?
Ok, where are all the chemistry freaks...!!!
tnx
/Chris
|
58.405 | .0 reposted for those of us struggling with 80 column displays | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Tue Jun 21 1994 22:21 | 26 |
| <<< 12DOT2::NOTES$STUFF:[NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Home_work >-
================================================================================
Note 5346.0 Sulfur smell in water No replies
WRKSYS::DEMERS 16 lines 21-JUN-1994 18:14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a new well in a new house. Water recently tested and all looks good.
Water is softened due to high iron
and manganese content - and I have a SMELL!
Seems only to be upstairs and after the water has been off for awhile. Best
example is that the smell is there
when the water is turned on first thing in the morning for brushing, etc.
It only lasts a second and then all is
well. Can't seem to get the smell downstairs.
Any ideas? I was thinking that a gas was finding the high spot in the
plumbing. Any chance there's a reaction
with minerals and the water softener?
Ok, where are all the chemistry freaks...!!!
tnx
/Chris
|
58.781 | Inconsistant hot water with a well system | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Wed Jun 22 1994 08:27 | 17 |
| In our new house we have a well. We've always had city systems before
so I know nothing about wells and pumps etc. The person who takes the first
shower in the morning gets plenty of hot water. Showers after that are less
pleasant, The water seems to cycle between cold and hot. It doesn't appear to
be a lack of hot water, it seems to be that the delivery of the water is
inconsistant. Water pressure seems to be a little low too. Last night I
chcnged the water filter - just the normal in-line sediment filter, nothing
fancy - and that seemed to help the pressure some. I don't know about the hot
water yet because I'm always thae first one in the morning to take a shower. I
should mention that ths problem is consistant throughout the day, If the water
has been used then the hot/cold water mix is a problem.
Anyone know what I can check or adjust?
Thanks,
George
|
58.406 | charcoal filters | BOBSBX::CHIQUOINE | Who audits the IRS? | Wed Jun 22 1994 08:56 | 15 |
| I lived in a house with a sulphurous water supply for 5 years. The
previous owner had put in a charcoal filter that helped, but was best
when new and sometimes wasn't quite up to the job. It seemed that the
level of sulphur in the water varied depending on underground
conditions. Still, the charcoal filter was a relatively cheap and
effective solution.
On the other hand, if you stay in the house long enough, you'll learn
the little tricks that minimize the sulphur effect -- like not
breathing immediately before or after you drink :-) You'll also
become inured to the smell if it's subtle. After a few years in that
house we would get comments from guests about a sulphur smell that we
no longer noticed.
Ken
|
58.401 | Unexpected solution to rust problem | TLE::FRIDAY | DEC Fortran: a gem of a language | Wed Jun 22 1994 11:33 | 23 |
| The problem with iron mentioned in the base note brings to
mind our problems with iron, and the eventual unexpected solution.
We bought an older home, one built in 1959, and it had its own well.
We noticed that there was some iron in the water, but nothing
exceptional. We mainly noticed it accumulating in the tanks of our
toilet, etc. But it did seem to be getting gradually worse over
the years.
Then, a couple of years ago the pump finally died. (It was over
30 years old, the oldest our plumber had ever seen.)
When they opened up the well to pull up the pump they found out
that the delivery pipes were all old galvanized iron, but the zinc
was long gone. The pipes were almost solid rust; it's a wonder
that they held together well enough that they could be pulled up.
The plumber replaced the delivery pipe with a more modern material
(black butyl???). After a while we noticed that the rust
level in our water seemed to be slacking off. Today the rust
accumulation seems to have stopped almost completely.
|
58.402 | just jump right in..... | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Wed Jun 22 1994 11:45 | 6 |
| re.3 (now moved)
Sorry about that, I didn't mean to step on someone else's note. I saw the base
note title and it applied so... I moved my question to a more appropriate place.
George
|
58.1034 | | BLAZER::MIKELIS | war is a crime against humanity | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:54 | 8 |
| <<< Note 5325.4 by JUPITR::HILDEBRANT "I'm the NRA" >>>
RE: .3
Well Sharing works great until you want to sell your house.
Marc H.
|
58.407 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Jun 22 1994 21:38 | 5 |
| I concur with .2, that an activated charcoal filter is effective for sulphur
odor. It was recommended to me in my first house and worked like a charm for
the seven years I owned the place.
-Jack
|
58.403 | pumping iron | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Jun 29 1994 09:44 | 16 |
| re:.4
I had a little different seen where the foot valve went and i pulled up
the pipe. It was the black plastic pipe with the water clamps on it.
Mind you I dont get much signs of "rust", except a film in the T-tank.
But the foot Valve was one large glob of rust. The clamps were also
in the same conditon.
So I replaced everything and added a filter in the house. No I end
up changing the paper cartridge every 2 months. I cant use a charcoal
filter because in clogs in two weeks. But the paper turns red after
a while and I know its time.
I was woundering if any of the "rust"could be coming out from the pump?
I have a new Simmer pump. Its about 3yrs old. There dosnt seem to
be much change from day one....
JD
|
58.782 | | NACAD::DESMOND | | Wed Jun 29 1994 16:40 | 10 |
| My father-in-law has a 25 foot well that he drilled himself with an
auger of some type. He put some 4 inch PVC pipe down it and now he
wants to put a pump in to bring the water up for watering plants. He
asked me if I knew where he could get a small pump that would fit down
inside a 4 inch pipe without spending a lot of money (i.e. under $100).
Any suggestions on what he should look for. He lives in Augusta,
Georgia but if there are some suggestions for sources in Central Mass.
I can go check it out for him. Thanks.
John
|
58.783 | Try an aquarium supply store... | WLW::TURCOTTE | That's it-your all still in trouble. | Thu Jun 30 1994 11:25 | 9 |
|
John,
They make pumps for artifical ponds and Fish tanks that are
fairly small and inexpensive, the only problem is that
I don't know if they will be able to handle a 25' head,
most I've seen only pump about 8 or 9 feet up.
Steve T.
|
58.784 | pull, not push? | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Thu Jun 30 1994 12:03 | 4 |
| Why does the pump have to go down the well? It's shallow enough
so he could just drop a pipe with a foot valve down the well and
use a suction pump. Another possibility....
|
58.785 | bilge pump? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Thu Jun 30 1994 12:10 | 3 |
|
Check out boating mags or chandlery supplies. There may be a bilge
pump that would fit the bill.
|
58.408 | could be bacteria | LOW8::AHO | How about some SMOKED SKEET? | Thu Jun 30 1994 12:38 | 14 |
|
I had a similar problem with our artesian well and I mentioned
it to a well driller and he said that sometimes it's caused by
a bacteria in the well. He suggested using about three chlorine
tablets (same as used for a pool) dropped down the well. It'll
be chlorine smelling for a few days, but after that if it's
a bacteria the sulfur smell will go away... Since it was not
a costly experiment, I gave it a try and it WORKED !! No more sulfur
smell....
Hope it works for you ...
Mike
|
58.409 | | MSE1::SULLIVAN | We have met the enemy & they is us! | Fri Jul 01 1994 11:11 | 10 |
| We have the same problem with our well. It is very common. It is a
bacteria...a harmless one. The bacteria are iron eating bacteria
and one of their byproducts is the sulphur. No health related
problems but it can be annoying.
It seems to come and go depending on the time of year. The bleach
trick does work. But in our case the effects don't last long.
Mark
|
58.664 | Water Witch Wanted... | BIGBAD::HURST | | Mon Jul 11 1994 11:12 | 3 |
| Anyone know of a Dowser in the Nashua area?
Steve.
|
58.665 | | HYDRA::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Jul 11 1994 15:06 | 1 |
| Tried the Psychic Friends Network?
|
58.666 | ASD | LTSLAB::IDE | My mind's lost in a household fog. | Tue Jul 12 1994 13:44 | 6 |
| re .35
Call the American Society of Dowsers in Danville, VT. They should be
able to give you a referral.
Jamie
|
58.667 | I'm missing "the point" | PTPM06::TALCOTT | | Wed Jul 13 1994 08:45 | 17 |
| High hopes turned to disappointment when after having put down a 18' deep, 3"
wide hole, and an equivalent number of feet of point and pipe I couldn't get
the point to prime. Sooooo, we pulled the pipe last night and discovered why it
wouldn't prime - the connection between the last drive coupling and the point
loosened as we pounded the point down the hole. Loosened enough, in fact that I
now have a $56 point as a permanent resident at the bottom of the hole. We had
some problems with the other couplings coming loose as we pounded and had to
tighten the pipes several times during the exercise. I'd like to be a bit more
successful next time - any suggestions on what could be done differently? We
used teflon tape on the threads; don't know what effect things like LockTight
would have on the tape. Several people in the neighborhood have put wells in
using the same approach and I'm the first to hit the problem. I'm tempted to
drill a new hole and pay/rent a bucket-loader to push the pipe down rather than
hammering it in. More than I wanted to spend, but maybe less expensive in the
long run than if I can avoid the last problem.
Trace
|
58.668 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Jul 13 1994 09:00 | 6 |
| I'd leave out the Teflon tape and just tighten up the joints with
a couple of big (BIG!) pipe wrenches. The Teflon tape is not a sealer,
it's a lubricant that makes it easier to tighten (or loosen!) the
joints. The sealing comes from the tapered pipe threads. If you
are worried about leaks, use that liquid "pipe dope" stuff that
hardens. I think one brand is RectorSeal, or some such name.
|
58.410 | gotta be more trusting... | WRKSYS::DEMERS | | Thu Jul 14 1994 11:31 | 13 |
| My builder suggested the same thing about the bacteria and I dismissed
it as a "quick and dirty" answer to avoid an issue! Once again,
Notes came thru!
If I do the chlorine thing, do I just take off the well cap? Seems
like I probably wouldn't want to mess with that - or is it just
a simple cap?
In any case, I'll call the well driller.
tnx
/C
|
58.411 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Thu Jul 14 1994 15:21 | 21 |
| Taking off the well cap is no big deal. Just take out the bolts.
Or, there may be a center pipe plug you can unscrew.
***NOTE*** Some older-style well caps are of a design that if
you take the bolts out completely, pieces will fall down in the
well. The more modern designs (rounded like a mushroom cap)
aren't built that way, but if your well cap is a flat circular
plate that's approximately the same diameter as the well pipe...
don't take the bolts all the way out! Just loosen them up.
Once you add the chlorine (bleach or whatever), run a garden hose
into the top of the well, turn it on, and circulate the water through
for a while, using the hose to rinse down the interior of the well
pipe. As far as how much to use...if you can smell or taste
chlorine in the water, you've got plenty. (I find my senses quickly
gets overwhelmed, so I need to back off for a while and then go back
to get an accurate sense of the presence of chlorine.) After you've
circulated the chlorinated water and rinsed down the interior of the
well, let it sit for as long as you can before using any water. Do
it in the evening just before you go to bed or something.
|
58.527 | Wash Wells | MARX::MCCROSSAN | Jack McCrossan 276-8371 | Mon Aug 01 1994 13:45 | 8 |
| I have found a number of references to "wash wells" in this conference, but
after searching all the notes on wells, haven't found a description. Can
anyone tell me what a wash well is and the pros and cons of having one? (We
are looking at a house to buy that has one.)
Thanks,
Jack
|
58.528 | Works for me | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Tue Aug 02 1994 12:14 | 8 |
| A wash well, I believe, is simply a shallow dug well. The pump is
in the house, typically in the basement. The well is shallow enough
that you don't need a pump in the well itself. If there's plenty of
underground water in your area, it should be fine, depending on where
that water is coming from (like runoff from the street perhaps).
Anyway, that's what I have, and I've been in the house for 5 years
without a problem with the well. I'm very careful about use of
pesticides and other chemicals around the well.
|
58.529 | More than you wanted to know | NUBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Tue Aug 02 1994 13:42 | 49 |
| We had a wash well when we lived in Nashua (no, the water line didn't
extend all the way out West Hollis in 1972).
Basically, a wash well is a point. As I understand the process, what
distinguishes a wash well from a simple point is that the point is driven
as far as you can drive it - or until you get the amount of water you
want - then you start pulling water out of it. On the other hand, with a
wash well you drive the point then you pump water down into it for some
period of time, the theory being that you're washing water channels and
maybe even a reasonable reservoir down there. You need a tank truck to do
do this.
Our wash well gave us problems one year. The pump, which was a shallow
well pump located in our cellar, burned up while we were were gone one
day because it was running without water coming up to cool and lubricate
it. I knew who had installed the well (The Original Wash Well Co. in
Merrimack), so I called them. They came over and said "Yup, she's burned
up all right." $310 later I had a new pump. It pumped water for about
three minutes, then air came through the lines and the pump started
running dry again. We could see the air bubbles begin to come in, because
the nylon fittings were translucent, and with a strong light behind them
you can watch bubbles fly past.
I called Mr. Wash Well back, who said "Well, I've seen some wells go bad,
and that's probably the case here. I'll have to put you on the list to
come drive a new well."
Instead, I set out to find out what was wrong. First problem was, we
didn't know where the well was. I dug where the well guy said he thought
he remembered putting it. Dug down over six feet. No well. Cutting to the
chase, I'll just say that the well was found five feet under our (paved)
driveway. (We had three different dowsers come; they were not even
close.)
When I discovered the well I also discovered the problem, which was a
cracked PVC-male pipe thread adapter. The well itself is a 3" pipe,
threaded at the top. A cast iron 90� elbow is at the top of the pipe. PVC
runs out of the house. You screw this plastic adapter into the cast iron
elbow, and slide and clamp the PVC over the convoluted ridges of the
adapter. That adapter cost me 28 cents --- plus $310 for the new pump,
plus a month's electricity for my neighbor, who supplied us with water
for a month via garden hose.
Other than that, we had no problems with our wash well. Raised two kids,
watered the lawn and garden, washed cars... all the normal stuff.
Hope this helps,
Art
|
58.530 | Thank you | MARX::MCCROSSAN | Jack McCrossan 276-8371 | Thu Aug 04 1994 13:05 | 8 |
| Thank you very much for your help. I spoke to the builder/owner yesterday for
the first time. He said the well was about 16ft deep, but it was 8 gal/minute
and the water tested just fine.
I am assuming that a good chunk of change was saved in going this route. I am
curious why more people don't have one. Is surface water supply unusual?
Jack
|
58.531 | | MAY30::CULLISON | | Thu Aug 04 1994 19:15 | 19 |
| Many areas do not have a dependable supply of water that shallow.
THey have to put in deep wells which require submersible pumps.
Shallow well cannot go much below 25 feet.
On some older homes they can be a problem because there were
no requirements for set back from septic system which there are
now. A shallow well can more easily be affected by something
near buy. Someone could spill gas on ground or septic system
could fail nearby and you would have a problem.
Of course with deep wells sometimes they get polluted by something
a mile away, that would not happen with a shallow well.
They are much cheaper to put in and work fine, but many areas you
just cannot do it anyway, so they have to go with deep.
Harold
|
58.532 | Only shallow one around | MARX::MCCROSSAN | Jack McCrossan 276-8371 | Thu Aug 04 1994 20:19 | 15 |
| re -.1
Thanks.
This home is 8 years old. The septic is in the front and the well is in the
back of the 1 acre property. I believe they are almost as far apar as they
could be.
Do you know if the set back from septic applies to neighboring proerties? The
well is very close to the property line.
Also, it's interesting that the 8-10 new homes on the same street (built by
the same builder) all have deep wells.
Jack
|
58.533 | check the location | 18463::DYMON | | Fri Aug 05 1994 07:44 | 10 |
| Sounds like he was going to put the septic in that area but found
a spring and to save a buck he droped the well in....
If it were me, I'd see what my neighboors systems were located and
to what direction surface water would run. I'd have to have a
wet season and find that everything drained into my back yard
and now i'm forced to drill a well because the bug count had gone
up and I can drink my water!
JD
|
58.534 | | MAY30::CULLISON | | Fri Aug 05 1994 13:13 | 37 |
| Mass. State septic codes which must be met, towns can be stricter, require
that wells be 100' away from any portion of the septic system,
including tanks, leaching fields/pits and all piping of septic.
there is probably a septic design plan for your house and also
any neighbors at the board of health at your town. If you
look at the plan you will see they draw a 100' radius from
well. The designer must certify that no septic systems are within
this radius, including yours or neighbors. It is nice to have
the plan around for future reference (i.e. for future building etc.).
Get a copy. Hopefully they have an as built plan, in other words
plan updatted to show actual installation which may not be same
as design because of unforseen issues, typically ledge etc.
Most towns require as built plans now, but many did not require
them years ago so they may not have one for you.
This requirement is for all abutters etc. These general requirements
have been around since the 70's. If your well was near property
line and a vacant lot was next door, then a future builder could
not install a septic system on the lot within a 100' of your well.
Wells can be close together and septics can be close, but wells
cannot be close to septics. of course it would not be so great to
have two shallow wells next to each other unless there was
plenty of capacity. There are set backs for septics to septics also
but they are not as strict.
the only time you may not meet the requirement is for older properties
potentially.
Just because they put in deep wells for other homes does not indicate
anything bad, probably did not find sufficient water for shallow
well.
the main thing i dislike about shallow wells is the typically noisey
pump in cellar, you cannot hear a submersible pump.
Harold Cullison
|
58.535 | Surface well | AWECIM::FLOYD | "On my way to Heaven" | Fri Aug 05 1994 13:46 | 13 |
| The name says it all. If you/we go into a drought season
you wind up without water. The least I would do with a
surface well is put in a R/O filter for drinking/ice water.
That cost is only $200 at the local sams club and takes
everything into the metal ion range out of the water. Thats
10 times smaller than all the known virus sizes. With an a
large prefilter in the 100 micron range you could litterally
hook it to the output of your secptic system and be OK if
you could get past the physiological thoughts of it.
my $.02
David
|
58.536 | Well wishing | NOVA::MICHON | | Mon Aug 15 1994 11:43 | 26 |
| I have town water and outragous sewer bills.
I do a lot of gardening and like to keep the lawn green
and am kicking the idea of getting a well just for irrigation
and not for drinking an wonder how much it might cost.
I gathere it would be cheaper
in general than a normal well... I wouldnt need to be guaranteed
water at any rate or drinkabilty.
I guess a lot depends on the where the ground water is.
My lot is like this: /
|---- my yard/gardens----| /---
-------/
+30' / \ ____/ledge
+20' / \ / \ __| |___/ ledge
+10' ______| |____| |__road__/ ledge
0' \|/ \|/ \|/ water in basements
wetlands
|----------------500'---------------|
Any guess on how much it might run?
Should I put the well in the lowest part of the yard and pump
up hill to the gardens there or put it at the top and irrigate down?
|
58.537 | Any wells nearby ? | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Mon Aug 15 1994 12:15 | 7 |
| If you can find anyone nearby that has a well, that might give you
a ballpark idea. If you have someone come in and do it, they're going
to charge you $X.XX amount per foot. Not sure if they make any
distinction between a well for watering vs. drinking in regards to
price.
Ray
|
58.538 | | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Mon Aug 15 1994 12:17 | 28 |
|
I think the first thing to find out is how much sand/soil you have
over the ledge. If there isn't enough to dig a shallow well and you
have to drill, that will run into some major money.
Since soil and sand tend to wash downhill over the centuries, I would
first try the lowest part of the property. You can investigate by
getting a steel rod and tapping it in with a hand sledge. If you find,
say, six or more feet of non-ledge, you could try to dig a well.
If you decide to go forward with a shallow well, you'll want to get
some estimates from excavation companies. I would guess that you could
get something like this dug, including concrete collars, for somewhere
between $1,000 and $2,000.
Since you'll only be using it in warm weather, you can get away with
a pretty cheap pumping system. You can get a shallow well pump for a
couple of hundred dollars or less, and you might even get away with
using a sump pump.
I think the real challenges will be figuring out a system that looks
presentable, allows easy access while keeping children and other small
critters from falling in, and isn't too big a pain to tear down for
winter storage.
JP
|
58.539 | | KAOFS::B_VANVALKENB | | Mon Aug 15 1994 13:06 | 7 |
| better check your bi-laws before going too far with this.
many areas force you to cap all wells and back fill all septic
systems as soon as you are connected to "city" water and sewage.
Brian V
|
58.540 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Mon Aug 15 1994 14:01 | 22 |
| re: .39
> to charge you $X.XX amount per foot. Not sure if they make any
> distinction between a well for watering vs. drinking in regards to
> price.
Unless you find someone willing to guarantee providing "a drinking
quality well capable of producing a flow of XGPM for $n000" (which
I both doubt, and would hate to think of what "n" equals), I will
guarantee you that they make absolutely no distinction. You will
pay by the foot, even if they come up with a dry hole.
re: .41
> many areas force you to cap all wells and back fill all septic
> systems as soon as you are connected to "city" water and sewage.
Provided you can demonstrate that a well doesn't share common plumbing
with the piping for the town water, can they actually require the
capping of an existing well?
-Jack
|
58.541 | Rules, Rules, Rules | AWECIM::FLOYD | "On my way to Heaven" | Mon Aug 15 1994 14:21 | 13 |
| Depending on where you are, They can actually stop you from sinking
a well. Has to do with lowering the water table of existing wells.
Also depending on the drainage in your area and any local septic
systems they could nix the well evan if you were not using it to
drink from. the fact that you intend to use it on an eddable produce
garden may be enough to stop you. I would check out all the laws as
anonymous as possible prior to asking specific questions attached to
your property. Because of the $ involved, this is not one of those
times when it is better to ask forgivness than it to ask permission.
my 2c.
Dave
|
58.542 | replies | NOVA::MICHON | | Mon Aug 15 1994 14:33 | 17 |
| re .40
I can answer the ledge question now.
My driveway is the lowest part of the yard.
I have it widened last year and the excavators
found ledge 6 inches below the drive.
SO basically the house is build on ledge,
and there is ledge at the top of the hill
as well.
I didn't thing drilling through ledge was big deal.
Its got to be better than clay for wells.
BTW if I was to locate the well pump out side
how big a structure would I need to contain it?
|
58.543 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Mon Aug 15 1994 14:54 | 28 |
| re: <<< Note 512.44 by NOVA::MICHON >>>
> My driveway is the lowest part of the yard.
> I have it widened last year and the excavators
> found ledge 6 inches below the drive.
Hmmm. This raises some interesting possibilities. For the cost of removal
of 6 inches of soil you could have a granite driveway! I wonder if that
could be surfaced effectively? :^)
> I didn't thing drilling through ledge was big deal.
> Its got to be better than clay for wells.
The salvation of a drilled well is ledge. You are going to pay a fixed
price per foot for drilling _PLUS_ a price per foot for steel casing
which is used until ledge is encountered. The quicker they hit ledge,
the quicker the cost decreases. The cost of drilling is the same regardless
of what they have to go through.
> BTW if I was to locate the well pump out side
> how big a structure would I need to contain it?
Even if it ends up being shallow, I'd think a submersed pump would be the
best answer. Then all you'd need above ground would be a pressure tank
and relay. Even with a shallow well or jet pump above ground, they often
mount piggyback on top of the tank.
-Jack
|
58.544 | Possible sewer charge abatement | SISDA::BWHITE | | Mon Aug 15 1994 16:52 | 6 |
| If the sewer charges are a problem, you should check into some type of
abatement process. I have recently seen articles on similar situations
where large amounts of water are used for watering and not put back into
the sewer system, and the sewer charges are reduced by the town through
an abatement process.
|
58.545 | second water line | NOVA::MICHON | | Mon Aug 15 1994 17:09 | 13 |
| yeah I checked the abatement process.
They install a second water meter (town only can do this)
in your home at a cost of $2000 (appx) and
you still end up paying for water, albeit
a lower rate.
For a couple of K I should at least check out a well.
PS
re -.2
There's no soil on the ledge under my driveway there is is six inches
of crushed stone and star pack as of last fall.
|
58.546 | rain water | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Tue Aug 16 1994 12:55 | 9 |
|
Why dont you see if you can get a point
well in first?
How about making a trailer from a truck frame and 275 tank
and filling it up in the swamp???? It would get you out of
the house once a week anyway.....
|
58.547 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Aug 16 1994 13:34 | 5 |
| > How about making a trailer from a truck frame and 275 tank
> and filling it up in the swamp????
Careful. Swamps are now called wetlands and have all kinds of environmental
regulations.
|
58.548 | can be costly | MAY30::CULLISON | | Tue Aug 16 1994 13:51 | 48 |
| It could be very costly.
I believe the general rate for drilling is about $7 to $9 per
foot.
But as mentioned there are no guarantees. You could drill 100'
in one spot and get plenty of water. You could move rig
over 50 feet and drill and conceivably go 500' and be dry
as a bone. Drillers usually know averages for areas if
wells have been drilled but these are averages only.
Example an area may have typical wells running from 150 to 400',
but yours could be 700'. You pay for every foot they drill regardless
of them finding water.
I think it would be safe to say that a typical deep water drilled
well with pump etc. will start at $3000 if you are lucky, and
the sky is the limit.
If you can put in a shallow well then that would reduce cost.
But other things.
IT is true in some towns that you cannot drill a well period.
Example, the water district in Acton controls the aquifer under
the town. Years ago there was a ban on water hook ups due to
the original problems with Grace causing town wells to be shut
down. There were a couple of houses built on Summer street that
could not hook up, they were allowed to install wells. As
soon as ban was lifted they were required to hook up to town
water including all costs, plus the old wells which worked fine
had to be capped. These requirements were in place and part
of the original agreement to allow houses to be built.
I believe however that only a few towns in
the state do not allow wells.
EVEn if you can drill you may need to meet water testing anyway.
I am not sure you can drill water wells without doing a bacteria
test ??? Check with local health department.
As far as the wetlands, remember this. Any well within 100' requires
a permit from conservation commission.
The most common cases of people installing wells are cases of
compainies with very large water usage who can justify the cost
of the well because of large savings.
|
58.549 | What's wrong with this picture | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Aug 16 1994 17:33 | 17 |
| re:-1
What were the "original problems with Grace" ? I see much of this
as the town trying to coerce people into protecting its investment in a
central water supply.
If you were to drill a well and use it to water your lawn/garden,
where would the water go ? Back into the aquifer for the most part. Of
course the money you spend to water your lawn and the increase in your
sewerage bill would be lost as revenue if you were *allowed* to put a
well on *your own property*. Hell, it could start a trend and others
may want to do that. Gotta squash this idea before it gets started :-(
Sorry for the cynicism but hearing this kind of stuff really irks
me.
Ray
|
58.550 | | MAY30::CULLISON | | Tue Aug 16 1994 18:23 | 55 |
| Grace I believe made batteries and other nasty things at their plant.
They had sludge ponds etc. that they dumped all sorts of
nasty things in over the years. Eventually it contaminated some
nearby town wells. Because the town had to shut down a large
amount of capacity that is why they had a moratorium on hook ups.
But regardless of that the town controls the aquifer and they
want to protect. Actually I believe the water district actually
controls it.
Aquifer rights like this occur in other places in the US also.
It is not unique to Acton.. I am not sure how common it is although.
Don't quote me on specifics of Grace etc. in Acton, I did not live
there, I lived next door in Boxborough which has wells. Someone
from Acton back then probably knows the details a lot better.
Grace has been cleaning up there contamination and also the
ground water by pumping the contaminated water that was effected
through a filtration system and then pumping back into ground
water. I believe the area is in pretty good shape.
THere are lots of funny things when it gets to water. Nagog pond
on Acton/Littleton line is owned by Cambridge. Not only can you
not swim or do much of anything in it, the local towns cannot even
take a drink. There are lots of strange cases like this around.
Some of the control of acuifers probably comes from areas in
arid sections of country where farmers and such would sink
large wells and literally pump an acquifer dry.
I would agree that a lot of these rules are more political
than anything.
But a lot of water pumped out and used for lawn/garden would NOT
go back in acquifer. A lot will evaporate and the some of what
goes back in will have nitrates etc. in it from fertilizer etc.
But getting back to the original thought, putting in a well to
save cost on water for a lawn/garden has to be thought out
carefully. It may cost you more up front than would ever be
saved. Messing around near a wetland may get you in more trouble
than you would want. Also the boundary of a wetland may be closer to
you than you realize many times. It is not always the boundary
at water's edge. When dealing with swampy areas many times the
wetland boundary can be on fairly dry land farther away from the
really wet area. It is called wetlands, but the vegetation is
what determines the actual boundary most times. Then you add a
100 foot buffer zone from that.
Harold
|
58.551 | | WIDGET::KLEIN | | Tue Aug 16 1994 18:32 | 17 |
| > If you were to drill a well and use it to water your lawn/garden,
> where would the water go ? Back into the aquifer for the most part.
It is my understanding that it takes Thousands Of Years for groundwater
to percolate to the depth of a deep well (more than, say, 250 feet). This
has been determined (so I hear) by "dating" well water using radioisotopic
analysis. Besides, most of this percolation comes from water captured in
wetlands, not sprinkled on lawns.
So, to answer your question, much of the water goes into the
sky (evaporation) and the rest goes into streams and lakes (runoff).
Please don't waste it.
MHO
-steve-
|
58.552 | POLITICS !!! | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Aug 17 1994 10:52 | 31 |
| Is it any less wasteful of water to water your lawn from a central
source than it is from a well ? If you happen to have both a well and a
septic, it appears to be more of a closed loop system than a central
supply. Yes, much of it will evaporate, but it will do that anyway
regardless of the source.
In a central system, you get water input from a reservoir and the
output goes to a treatment plant. In the two treatment plants I know
of, the treated water goes into rivers that flow into the ocean. The
loop comes in the form of precipitation.
In the case of some of the big reservoirs, I've heard where the
demand for fresh water is such that the normal average precipitation
(supply) can no longer keep up. There's plenty of water, it's just not
fresh water.
If someone is worried that nitrates will make there way into the
aquifer from watering a lawn, they'll do that whether or not you water
your lawn from a central source or a well.
There are lots of things that can be done to preserve water. One
of the ways I've heard is to take the output of the dishwasher, washer,
and bathtub and run it to a holding tank. The holding tank water is
circulated through a pool type filter to remove the soap. The water can
then be used to water the lawn, but...
Of course there are rules against this in some places. You might be
putting phosphates on the lawn, but it's OK to spread weed killers and
insecticides on your lawn/garden. Go figure.
Ray
|
58.553 | How About a Present-Day Rain Barrel | N6331A::STLAURENT | | Wed Aug 17 1994 13:39 | 21 |
|
How about the old Rain Barrel Trick. Simply divert your down spouts into
holding tank. If you lucky and the garden is down hill from the house,
gravity will delivery the water as needed. If not, throw a switch to a
appropriately sized pump and instant gratification of beating the local
sewer department back into submission.
If your able to scrounge the two major components , tank and pump, the
only major outlay is getting the tank buried. Even if bought new, this
system could to build for under $500. I'm guessing but:
$200 for a 250 gal. tank
$100 for pump
$100 backhoe work ~2hrs
$100 for elec./plumb. finish materials
This assumes DIY labor which is in the spirit of this conference and
sure beats ~ $2-5K for a new well setup. Only drawback is in times of
drought you draw from the town source. This water can be used to water
the garden and lawn, wash the car or maybe keep the pool topped off.
Only maintenance would be seasonally redirecting the down spouts,draining
the lines and what ever may be needed to keep the pump working
smoothly.
|
58.554 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Aug 17 1994 14:24 | 4 |
| If you have a lot more garden/lawn than roof, or if you don't have gutters,
that wouldn't work too well. BTW, I was going to say that a 250 gallon tank
was overkill, but I did a quick calculation. If you collect 1" of rain from
1000 ft�, you end up with 623 gallons.
|
58.555 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Aug 17 1994 16:06 | 2 |
| That much standing water for a period in the summer time isn't all
that pleasant an idea.
|
58.556 | Storage is the key | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Aug 17 1994 17:22 | 26 |
| If the tank was underground (read - no light source), would
standing water be an issue ? I had thought of this same idea and mentioned
this to a couple people myself.
The problem is if you want to do a large lawn area with a typical
inground system, your storage needs to be fairly large to be effective.
Let's assume a relatively small area with 10 sprinkler heads. Keep in
mind that inground sprinker heads need to be set-up with head-to-head
(over-lapping) coverage, so this is not a very large area (<1000 sq. ft.).
A typical inground sprinkler head is 2 gal/min., so 10 of them would be 20
gal/min. or 1200 gal/hr..
A full 1200 gallon storage tank would give your lawn four 15 minute
waterings. This would work OK for a small area, and it would reduce your
overall water bill, but the town water would still be the primary
source if you wanted to do any significantly sized lawn area.
I'm guessing that a 1200 gal. storage tank is going to run you closer
to $500. A pump capable of 1200 GPH for $100 is probably in the ballpark,
but keep in mind that this would be for a fairly small lawn. Larger lawns
will need either a bigger pump or zone valves, as well as even more
water storage to be effective. You can probably add at least another $150
or so for zone valves/timer or double the pump cost for a larger lawn.
Ray
|
58.557 | Some numbers | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Aug 17 1994 17:41 | 17 |
| For those interested, I figured I'd pass on some notes on how I
arrived at my numbers. If nothing else, it helps validate them.
Assuming a house with outside dimensions of 20x40, I did the
following -
(20' x 12") x (40' x 12") = 115,200 sq. in.
If a 1" rain were to hit this area, the sq. in. become cu. in. of
water. There are 231 cu. in. of water to a gal. so this would equate to
499 gal..
I did not take into account surface area of the total roof surface
itself (due to pitch) because I don't think it applies. Someone will
likely correct me if I'm wrong.
Ray
|
58.558 | sop in some parts of the world | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Wed Aug 17 1994 18:11 | 9 |
| fwiw:
it's standard practice in the Carribean to divert one side of the
house roof (and these are small houses) into a cistern. Which is then
used as the water supply. (It also rains a lot down there!)
Most have a good roof on them... I don't know what else you do to keep
things from growing in there, other than turnover.
Dave.
|
58.559 | How about a pool ? | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Aug 18 1994 17:16 | 12 |
| I suspect that I already know the answer to this, but I'll ask
anyway. How detrimental would the water from a swimming pool (and all
the normal associated chemicals) be to a lawn.
If not for the chlorine/algecide, it would otherwise be an ideal
source to both channel and collect rain water for watering a lawn. The
surface area of most pools is fairly significant in itself. Aside from
the storage problem, it also fixes the stagnation problem (if applicable).
Of course, without the chlorine/algecide, you probably wouldn't want to
swim in it.
Ray
|
58.560 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Fri Aug 19 1994 13:17 | 6 |
| I usually need to _add_ water to my pool several times over the course of
the summer. I wouldn't accomplish much by depleting the supply for use on the
lawn.
But you're right - the chemicals aren't going to do the grass any good.
|
58.561 | depends on use | NECSC::DWORSACK | | Fri Aug 19 1994 15:38 | 5 |
| I wouldnt worry about it if your just using it for general
watering of the grass, as i dont think the level of the chemicals
would be high enough to do any harm.
BUT if your just starting out new seed that may be another matter...
|
58.562 | You might want to test it a bit before dumping out tons of water | PTPM06::TALCOTT | | Tue Aug 23 1994 08:42 | 5 |
| My neighbor siphoned off some of his pool water to a piece of lawn we
unofficially share and succeeded in killing a patch of it. A bit of reseeding
and we're back to grass once again.
Trace
|
58.563 | | DFSAXP::JP | Telling tales of Parrotheads and Parties | Tue Aug 23 1994 13:19 | 5 |
| A pool will collect the same number of inches per square foot of surface area
as a lawn would. If the lawn doesn't get enough water during the course of a
summer, then the pool won't get enough water to maintain a patch of lawn equal
to the size of the pool. Unless you have a half acre pool, and a 20x30 foot
lawn.
|
58.564 | It would work, but... | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Aug 23 1994 15:09 | 19 |
| re:65
Not sure if you read the previous notes but the discussion was
going along the lines of a cistern. The water that hits the roof (as
collected by the gutters) would be channeled into the pool.
You can't directly equate collector surface area to lawn area when
storage is involved. It's like saying that a 2" downpour once every 2
weeks has the same effect on lawn watering requirements as eight 1/4"
showers spread out over the same time period. Both equate to the same
amount of water, but...
If you go back a few notes, find the formula and work the numbers I
think you'll find it can save *substantial* amounts of water. I'd re-enter
a few of the key points but it's not worth it. Although a pool has more
than adequate storage capacity, the algecide/chlorine normally found in
pool water is not the best thing to be putting on your lawn/garden.
Ray
|
58.786 | Hesitation in flow rate | DELNI::BJORK | | Thu Sep 01 1994 10:03 | 37 |
|
Hi,
I have a deep well that's worked fine for 11 years: good pressure,
good volume, smooth flow. Like most people, I ignored the system
because it functioned; now I wished I'd noted exactly what defined
'normal' because the system has developed a problem. I did a
DIR/TITLE="Well" and read all the notes but I don't think this problem
has come up.
The system has a Square D relay that cuts in at 30 psi and cuts out at
50 psi. The label on the pressurized holding tank says it has been
'factory charged to 30 psi. Tank precharge pressure must always be the
same as pump cut-in pressure.'
The problem: whenever there's a high demand (toilet tank fill, showers,
etc.), the flow rate pauses momentarily (~1 second), the relay switches
the pump on, and then the flow continues. There is no apparent pressure
change before or after the pause - just a hiccup in the delivery.
I watched the relay while a family member took a shower. The switch
closed 3 or 4 times and, in each instance, stayed closed for ~15 seconds.
I also watched the pressure gauage and it *never* moved; it reads a
constant 40 psi. It doesn't drop to the cut-in 30 psi before the relay
closes and it doesn't climb to the cut-out 50 psi before the relay opens.
Any ideas on why I no longer get a smooth, continuous water flow? Should
I replace the pressure guage (the system seems to be correctly sensing
cut-in, cut-out)?
One other observation that may or may not be related: I noticed that
when the relay closes, the points do not make physical contact. That is,
there's a gap between opposing pairs of points. Is this normal?
Thanks!
Steve
|
58.787 | | NUBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Thu Sep 01 1994 14:15 | 10 |
| RE: -.1 - I had somewhat the same experience. The pressure-actuated
switch is mounted on a 4" or so length of small pipe. That pipe was
completely jammed with rust and scale, so that the pressure in the system
didn't really get to the actuator.
Second similarity was that when I replaced that pipe, I also replaced the
pressure gauge because it simply didn't work, but always pointed
somewhere around 40 lbs.
Art
|
58.788 | more on reply .109 | DELNI::BJORK | | Fri Sep 02 1994 13:38 | 15 |
| Hi Art, thanks for your reply. My pressure guage is also on top of a
short piece of small diameter pipe. And I suspect sediment obstruction
in the pipe has frozen the guage. But where is the pressure sensor?
Is it part of the guage atop the pipe, or is it at the bottom of the
pipe? As I said in .109, the relay seems to cut in and out properly,
but the needle never moves off of 40 psi and the water delivery has
a brief hiccup when the relay closes at cut-in pressure. If I just
replace the pipe and guage, will I fix the problem?
And I'd still like to know whether the contact points in the relay
should physically touch when the switch closes.
Thanks,
Steve
|
58.789 | This could happen to you...... | WRKSYS::DLEBLANC | | Tue Sep 06 1994 09:28 | 17 |
| My neighbor who is sometimes known to be hysterical about
certain things came screaming out of the house the other
day. Her husband figured is was just another screaming fit, but decided
he'd better investigate. His wife said there was water coming
out of a hose. Before going in, he thought it would be a broken
washing machine hose and told her on the way in "why don't you just
turn off the water".
What he discovered was the 1�" well pump plastic pipe had come off the tank
and was pumping water into the basement profusely, now inches deep
on the floor, and the pipe whipping around wetting everything in site.
OK, this time the screaming was justified.
Apparently the hose clamp was not tight enough; He recalled
tightening it with a crew driver rather than a wrench.
|
58.790 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Sep 06 1994 09:32 | 13 |
| The gauge is virtually guaranteed to be a Bourdon-tube gauge, so
it's all mechanical. Inside the gauge there's a curved, flattened
tube closed on the end. When it's pressurised, the tube tries
to straighten out, and the movement of the end of the tube is
transmitted, by levers and gears, to the indicating needle on the
dial. They work virtually forever, unless they get crud in them.
(Or in the pipe leading to them.)
Re: the relay, the controller may be capable of handling 3-phase
current, or be set up for additional functions that your well
doesn't need, which is why some of the contacts aren't closing.
I bet if you look really carefully, you'll find that there are
some contacts on the relay that are closing. (Just a guess....)
|
58.791 | Low pressure in morning only | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Fri Sep 09 1994 10:40 | 27 |
| Just to get some ideas, I have the following happening. The last
few weeks I've noticed a decrease in water pressure when taking the
first shower of the morning. After a period of time, the pressure
increases and returns to normal (for this house) and remains that way
for the rest of the day.
The pressure guage is showing something like 80 lbs., but I think
it is stuck. I've yet to watch it to see what it does first thing in
the morning but I'll be checking it tommorrow.
This morning, I tried to take a shower and nothing came out. I
flushed the toilet first and it appeared to use up all available
pressure, then the pump must have kicked on and brought the pressure to
normal.
It is definitely not a case of running out of water. It's just that
the low pressure switch does not seem to be kicking on and I'm guessing
that over the course of a night, I must be losing pressure somewhere.
I'm going to take a look at the contacts of the relay and also see if I
can fix the pressure guage tonight. If I can do that, than I can
probably get a better handle on whether I'm looking at two different
problems or not.
Any other thoughts/checks/suggestions on this ? How often does the
holding tank normally need to be re-pressurized ?
Ray
|
58.792 | Solids | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Fri Sep 09 1994 10:52 | 7 |
|
Remove the pressure switch and check for foriegn matter
which would settle into a chunk to block the path.
I have a periodic problem with that here at SHR.
Fred
|
58.419 | Water well change from surface pump to deepwell? | TPSYS::WEST | | Fri Sep 16 1994 14:40 | 29 |
|
I have a "new" 40yr old home with a 1/4 horse pump in the bsmt and a two hose
system to my well (depth unknown).
Water supply is good so far, but tank is only 20 or 30 gal, pump is noisy, and
max pressure is only about 35 psi.
I would like to get
more pressure
more tank reserve
less noise
Does it make sense to change out to a submersible, or is the labor cost too much
to work downhole?
I can get a fairly new used pump (1/2 hp) and tank for 325. What about labor
to put it downhole?
Also, well is about 150 feet from the house --- can I fish the elec cable thru
the old return line and save the cost of excavating for the cable, and reuse
the old suction line?
any comments are welcome
bob
|
58.420 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Fri Sep 16 1994 19:35 | 48 |
| >I have a "new" 40yr old home with a 1/4 horse pump in the bsmt and a two hose
>system to my well (depth unknown).
This sounds like a typical "jet pump", which is good, reliable technology.
The smaller diameter tubing is a return tube. The idea is that the pump
pushes some water down this pipe to assist in pulling a larger volume of
water back up the larger diameter pipe. It's relatively cheap and easy
to maintain.
>Water supply is good so far, but tank is only 20 or 30 gal, pump is noisy, and
>max pressure is only about 35 psi.
Tank size may not be an issue. What's the control system on the tank? Presurized
or via an air-volume system? The tank can be improved upon for relatively little
expense if need be. The noise may be due to age/bearings of the pump or it may
by "natural", i.e. it "just sounds noisy to you". If the latter, a sound baffle
around it can do wonders. The pressure may be increased by making an adjustment
on your pressure switch. If 35 is the best you get, and the pump shuts off when
it gets there, try adjusting the cutout pressure upwards to a point that you
like which isn't past the capacity of either your system or pump.
>Does it make sense to change out to a submersible, or is the labor cost too much
>to work downhole?
If I had a working jet pump system, I wouldn't change to a submersible, but
that may be a matter of taste. Certainly a submersible _will_ eliminate your
noise issue.
>I can get a fairly new used pump (1/2 hp) and tank for 325. What about labor
>to put it downhole?
I can't respond, but consider the cost of the excavation necessary as well
as installation costs. (You will have to excavate around the well head,
regardless.)
>Also, well is about 150 feet from the house --- can I fish the elec cable thru
>the old return line and save the cost of excavating for the cable, and reuse
>the old suction line?
Yes, sort of. The pressure line makes a good conduit for the cable if your
building inspector agrees. As far as reusing the supply line, keep in mind that
the "interface" is going to be different. Most likely, your jet pump lines
are installed through a sanitary seal on top of the casing at the wellhead.
Your submersible is likely best installed with a pitless adapter which requires
a hole drilled through the side of the casing. Also, your jet setup will have to
be extricated before the submersible can go down there.
-Jack
|
58.421 | | TPSYS::WEST | | Mon Sep 19 1994 10:01 | 16 |
|
RE: -1
Thanks for the info.
I have tried to adjust the pressure switch up to around 40-42, but the pump then
has to run for a very long time to get that last few psi to turn off -- I am
at pump capacity.
So I know the pump has to be replaced. Question is: in house or in well.
I just called a contractor to give me his $$$ estimates, and will use your
information as help
thanks.
|
58.422 | | TOOK::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Mon Sep 19 1994 12:15 | 6 |
| Do you have any idea as to the depth of the well? It may also be that you're
stretching the limit for the technology, in which case a submersible may be
your only answer. I seem to recall that jets are good only to a depth of
maybe 150 or slightly more, but I'm not too sure about the figure.
-Jack
|
58.423 | | MAY30::CULLISON | | Mon Sep 26 1994 19:29 | 6 |
| If the pump is in the basement then the well is less than
32 feet deep.
I think a new replacement pump and a little money build a well
ventilated structure around it to reduce noise would work
fine, reduce noise, and a lot cheaper than a submersible installation.
|
58.424 | | WRKSYS::MORONEY | rearranger of rotating rust | Mon Sep 26 1994 20:46 | 7 |
| re .4:
I think a jet pump (implied by 2 pipe system) can go well beyond the
~32 feet limit of a simple suction pump. I think they can go to 100
feet or so.
-Mike
|
58.425 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Sep 27 1994 09:28 | 3 |
| re: .5
Yes, a jet pump can go pretty deep. My uncle has a jet pump for
his 175' well.
|
58.1035 | Need Help: New Well Bad, Driller Disappears | SMAUG::MENDEL | Welcome to the next baselevel | Mon Oct 10 1994 12:58 | 70 |
| Hi, all.
In the past you've helped me finish my woodwork and build my deck.
Now I need some real advice about my well. I've never had a well before,
and now I live in a newly built house that has one. I looked through
this conference, btw, but couldn't find anything that could quite
help me. (But if I missed something, please don't do a 3502.1 to me.)
First, I need to fill in my large gaps of knowledge. Also I need advice
on how to proceed. Is anyone game? OK... Here's info, and then
questions at the end.
* Our house was built during the past winter, making it about 10
months old now. The water was just fine until June-July, and then
the washing machine cold water started dying. Turned out to be
sand/sediment/dirt. The washing machine filter screen collects about
a tablespoon full of this sludge -every-load-.
* Possibly related: this started occurring about the time I started
planting the lawn, watering as much as twice-per-day for a while.
The sprinklers - the attach-to-the-end-of-the-hose kind - also
clog extremely frequently. Also, watching the sprinklers, one
cannot but notice how the water pressure goes up... then down...
then up... then down...
* Of course, I called the well driller who did the well (on behalf of
the builder - I didn't choose this guy). I won't mention any
names (but I will say I disagree with 2033.7).
The man can only be contacted by an answering machine. He returned
my first call right away. Since I described my problem, he has
not returned a call - and I call him every day. He also blew off the
promised apointment. He has no addresses listed in the phone book,
with directory assistance, or even with the builder's office.
Cool.
* The same builder/well driller combo have built four other houses
on the same hill. Many, many well problems. One needed to be redrilled
because of Aresenic. Another had a basement flood, due to sand in
the water - they cobbed in a filter, which (looking at the result)
seems to be a quick and cheep patch rather than a real solution.
The same driller has been giving these other poor owners a real
runaround as well - unanswered calls, unattended appointments.
Obviously, this guy wants to stop spending his own money fixing
problems up on this hill.
QUESTIONS:
- Is a filter really the best solution? What about raising the
pump at the bottom of the well (rumor I heard)?
What are the different solutions to this problem that are
possible? How do I choose the correct one?
(I don't trust the driller to give me the right answer.)
- What tactics can I use to get some action? Is there anything
I can do that lies somewhere between leaving weeny messages on his
machine, and calling a lawyer?
I want to fix my problem. That's #1. My wallet is #2. Standing on
principles and defending my pride are way low on the list.
True, sincere thanks to any responses...
Kevin
|
58.1036 | Some ideals.... | WLW::TURCOTTE | Thank goodness for every wrong move | Mon Oct 10 1994 15:34 | 8 |
|
You could get the name of a dependable driller, have the work done
and try to force payment of the bill by the first driller, via a
suit, or even just the threat of a suit. Report him to the better
business, and contact you local building inspector, to find out who
approved such shoddy work
Steve T.
|
58.1037 | raised pump level, problem is better | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Mon Oct 10 1994 23:05 | 19 |
| Last year we had a crack in the casing in the well. While fixing the problem
I asked the persons doing the work about sediment. I had to change the
sediment filter in the basement every couple months.
Other than the [whole house] sediment filter (which we already had), he
mentioned:
1 - redrill (too expensive, and not gauranteed)
2 - add a fine screen mesh filter to the pump itself where it takes in water.
(can cause the pump to overwork)
3 - re-adjust the height of the pump.
Well, as a side-effect of fixing the casing, the pump was raised about 1 foot.
... and the sediment problem is just about gone. Only changed the filter
once in the last 9 months.
fwiw,
Dan
|
58.1038 | Don't you have to have some kind of filter? | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Tue Oct 11 1994 08:28 | 3 |
| Are you saying that you have no filters between the well and the house at all?
I'm also in my first house with a well. We have a sediment filter in the
basement which I thought that was standard practice for well-supplied houses.
|
58.1039 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Oct 11 1994 09:27 | 5 |
| It might be worth checking to see 1) how deep the well is and 2) where
the pump is in relation to the bottom of the well. My well is 240'
deep and the people who put in the pump put it at 200', so there's
40' at the bottom for sediment to collect. You may want to be talking
to whoever installed the pump, not the guy who drilled the well.
|
58.1040 | | SMAUG::MENDEL | Welcome to the next baselevel | Tue Oct 11 1994 10:58 | 38 |
| Thanks for the replies! Don't stop!
>>> Are you saying that you have no filters between the well and the house at
>>> all? I'm also in my first house with a well. We have a sediment filter in
>>> the basement which I thought that was standard practice for well-supplied
>>> houses.
The builder does not consider it mandatory, apparently. We do not
have one. The house next door that he did has one, but only after
(1) the basement flooded, and (2) they screamed at him for a long,
long time.
Is there a case to be made that they should be considered mandatory?
Also, at what point is a filter "just not enough". The neighbors
just mentioned have to flush theirs every couple of nights (they say)
just to maintain minimal water pressure - like for a 90 second shower.
>>> It might be worth checking to see 1) how deep the well is and 2) where
>>> the pump is in relation to the bottom of the well. My well is 240'
>>> deep and the people who put in the pump put it at 200', so there's
>>> 40' at the bottom for sediment to collect. You may want to be talking
>>> to whoever installed the pump, not the guy who drilled the well.
I know the well is over 600' deep. I believe that the driller also
installed the pump - the company name is "XXX Well and Pump". If
I can ever get to talk to him, I'll ask.
>>> Other than the [whole house] sediment filter (which we already had), he
>>> mentioned:
>>>
>>> 3 - re-adjust the height of the pump.
It sounds like adjusting the pump height can help the problem, and it
seems like a hole lot more of a long term solution.
Kevin
|
58.1041 | Wells, filters | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Tue Oct 11 1994 12:50 | 17 |
| We have a deep well, and a filter. The filter was installed after
we got sick and tired of replacing faucet components and sprinklers
ruined by the sand and grit. The plumbing supply store explained
the likely problem. I think the filter and installation cost us less
than $200. In three years it has saved us much more than that in
faucet parts, sprinkers, and aggravation.
The grit also ruined the seal on the flush mechanism one of the
toilets.
We change a $5.00 filter cartridge every few months.
Sand and grit filters are just cannisters with a filter medium. They
are much simpler and cheaper than water softeners and water
purification systems.
Margaret.
|
58.1042 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Tue Oct 11 1994 14:40 | 16 |
| >> 3 - re-adjust the height of the pump.
>
> It sounds like adjusting the pump height can help the problem, and it
> seems like a hole lot more of a long term solution.
But no gaurantees with this solution either. Any change or disturbance
in the water tables in the area can trigger the problem to re-surface...
I would try the whole-house sediment filter first. Since no matter what you
do to the well, an in-house filter will only enhance it. And See how
frequently you have to change the filter to maintain the pressure...
Dan
ps - Spag's has a sale a couple times a year on water purification parts...
The s1 filters are only $2.change each.
|
58.1043 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Oct 12 1994 10:05 | 9 |
| The whole-house filter is certainly the cheapest and simplest thing
to try. The problem may disappear after a while, after whatever
brought all the sediment into the well settles down. I think that
sort of thing can happen once in a while with the change of seasons
and temperature, small earthquakes (not enough to feel, but enough
to shift the ground a bit), and such. After all, when you first
moved in the water was okay. Perhaps it was from all the water
use, watering the lawn and drawing down the level of water in the well.
|
58.1044 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Wed Oct 12 1994 10:58 | 6 |
|
Western MA had an earthquake quite recently. Did this sediment
happen before or after this event?
|
58.1045 | xxx | GRANMA::GHALSTEAD | | Wed Oct 12 1994 17:06 | 2 |
| Construction a half mile away can cause your well water to change for
the better or the worse.
|
58.264 | | NETCAD::DESMOND | | Wed Nov 30 1994 16:03 | 19 |
| Well, it's now time for me to revisit this topic. Our tankless coil
is so clogged up that we barely get enough water for a shower. The
dishes on the top rack of the dishwasher don't get clean so we end up
washing them by hand. We've been told that we need a water softener.
The explanation goes something like this:
If the pH of the water is above 7 (ours is 7.3) and the water is hard
(our water has a hardness of 122, (don't remember the units)), then
deposits will form on the inside of the coil. The only solution for
this is a water softener for about $900 plus $200 for installation.
We also need a new coil which is about $140 plus $100 labor. It's
taken about a year and a half to clog up so it doesn't seem reasonable
to just keep replacing the coil.
Does the part about the pH and the hardness make sense? Any
suggestions other than a water softener to correct this? Thanks.
John
|
58.265 | | NETCAD::DESMOND | | Wed Nov 30 1994 16:17 | 14 |
| A thought occurred to me right after I entered the previous reply. One
of my neighbors just replaced his tankless coil with an electric hot
water tank. He still heats his house with the oil burner but he said
the hot water to heat the house does not come through the coil; only
the hot water from the faucets goes through the coil. So since the
only water problems we've had is with clogging of the coil, would we be
better off just installing an electric hot water tank? Any idea what
size we would need for a family of four (at least for now; may grow to
six in the future)? How about a rough price estimate? And finally,
how would the electric power consumption of a water softener compare to
a hot water heater? I assume the heater would use a lot more
electricity.
John
|
58.266 | Some general info | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Nov 30 1994 18:45 | 21 |
| A 40 or 52 gal. unit should be fine for a family of 4. Costs will
be ~$300 + or - not including installation. It will likely cost a bit
more than the oil burner for hot water, but I'd guess a difference of
only about $15/month give or take a few $.
Maintenance is fairly simple and frequency depends upon your water.
One problem is if you have calcium in your water. It will form a shell
like substance on the elements which will crack, break off, and build
up deposits on the bottom of the tank. If left long enough, they'll
build up to the level of the lower element and cause it to blow.
Life expectancy of a unit is supposed to be 7 years, but I have one
at nearly double that and it's still OK. It should be installed either
over or near a floor drain as the tank will evenually corrode and leak
when the unit needs to be replaced.
One other thing, you won't get endless hot water like a tankless oil
system. One very long shower can use all the hot water, but recovery time
is usually only about 15 minutes or so.
Ray
|
58.267 | Maybe a rental | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Wed Nov 30 1994 23:26 | 10 |
| I used to lease a water heater from Mass. Electric for about
$7.00 a month. It was an 80 gallon unit and very well insulated.
The only reason I got rid of it was because the propane company
put the squeeze on me, so I leased a propane WH from them (one
time fee of $50.).
The electric WH was only a little more costly to run than the
propane heater is. Of course, propane prices are more flexible
than electric rates.
Tim
|
58.268 | | CPDW::PALUSES | Bob Paluses @SHR | Thu Dec 01 1994 11:15 | 6 |
| you can also get a hot water storage tank for your furnace. when we
replaced our oil burner we spent a few extra $ to go with this option
instead of using a tankless coil to heat water or an electric hot
water heater.
Bob
|
58.269 | | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Dec 01 1994 13:00 | 12 |
| The cost of electricity to run a water softener is virtually zero --
the cost of running a small electric clock plus the cost of the
electricity your water pump would use if you open a faucet for about
an hour every few days.
Regarding .-1, I'm unclear how the hot water storage tank works.
Does it use the regular tankless coils to heat the water? If so,
isn't the water rate still restricted if the coils are clogged?
Or does it contain its own pump to pressurize water coming out?
Regards,
Larry
|
58.270 | tank vs tankless | CPDW::PALUSES | Bob Paluses @SHR | Thu Dec 01 1994 13:29 | 17 |
| > Regarding .-1, I'm unclear how the hot water storage tank works.
>Does it use the regular tankless coils to heat the water? If so,
>isn't the water rate still restricted if the coils are clogged?
They way I understand it.
Tankless uses waterflow thru coils on demand, as needed. Hot
water flow can/will become restricted as coils age and get
crudded up.
the storage tank uses the furnance to heat
up water to predtermined temp, and stores it. When you draw hot
water, it comes from the tank and is not subject to coil restriction.
This gives you a much longer and steady supply of hot water as opposed
to drawing directly off of a tankless coil.
Bob
|
58.271 | | NETCAD::DESMOND | | Thu Dec 01 1994 13:53 | 10 |
| Re .30:
I assume that the hot water tank instead of the tankless coil is only
an option if we are replacing the whole oil burner.
About leasing a propane water heater. Who do you lease it from? We
don't have gas lines running to the house so we would have to use
bottled gas. Is leasing still an option?
John
|
58.272 | | WRKSYS::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Thu Dec 01 1994 15:25 | 7 |
| re .32: Ah, so the tank is on a separate heating zone? That makes
sense. It's still got coils, but the water recirculates through
the coils and hence they don't get crudded up. I may need to do
that -- I think my own tankless coil is getting pretty restricted.
Regards,
Larry
|
58.273 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Dec 01 1994 18:05 | 6 |
| You can add a storage tank to any FHW system. In a previous house,
it was added using the in-boiler coil, mainly because it had recently
been replaced. My current house has one run off a separate zone.
I think they're wonderful.
Steve
|
58.274 | | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Fri Dec 02 1994 11:57 | 10 |
| Had exactly the same problem a few years ago. Tankless coil gave less
and less flow. Options were an acid flush (which will dissolve some of
the build-up as well as some of the coper pipe!), replace the coils, or
remove the coils and install a hot water tank on a new zone off the
boiler. Option 1 was cheapest but shortest lasting, option 3 was most
expensive, but best for the long term. I did option 3. I finally had
plenty of hot water, and as I am ciculating 'old' water through the hot
water tank, I am not constantly introducing new deposits into the pipe.
Go for the separate tank.
|
58.275 | mild acid will do it. | EVMS::KAYAK::GROSSO | Prevent & Prepare or Repent & Repair | Fri Dec 02 1994 12:31 | 7 |
| As for the acid flush, if you hire a plumber to do it, the first visit will
be the expensive one because he/she'll probably have to install boiler drains
and shutoff valves so a hose can be connected to either end of the coil and it
can be isolated for the flush. We experimented with household vinegar and it
was impressive how much of the deposits were removed just with a mild acid.
You could accomplish even more with muriatic acid. How badly are you looking
for a DIY solution? (oops, was that a pun?)
|
58.276 | | NETCAD::DESMOND | | Fri Dec 02 1994 17:26 | 11 |
| Re .36:
Are you saying that you added a hot water tank to your existing boiler
and the hot water was heated by the same boiler that had heated the
tankless coil? How expensive was this solution?
I don't understand what you mean about circulating 'old' water through
the hot water tank. Whenever you use some of the water, you will get
new water in from the well just like with a tankless system, right?
John
|
58.277 | | WRKSYS::MORONEY | | Fri Dec 02 1994 17:57 | 15 |
| re -1:
These tanks work by taking hot water from the FHW system (usually as its own
zone) and running it through a coil inside the water tank. Sort of like the
tankless coil system inside-out. Since the water inside the coil is
recirculated water from the boiler, junk won't build up inside it.
It is possible for junk to build up on the _outside_ of the coil but this
isn't as much as a problem (it's a loss of efficiency since the junk will
insulate somewhat) unless there's so much junk the tank fills with it.
There could be a leak in the coil allowing new water in the boiler but this
will probably show itself by the boiler blowing the pressure relief valve
if the water pressure in the house is reasonable.
-Mike
|
58.278 | Try the yellow pages... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Sat Dec 03 1994 05:50 | 19 |
| > About leasing a propane water heater. Who do you lease it from? We
> don't have gas lines running to the house so we would have to use
> bottled gas. Is leasing still an option?
My tank is leased from the propane company I buy the propane
from. They own the water tank and the propane tank so I don't
have the option of shopping around for the best prices. But I
haggled and got a little leeway in price.
The company I use is Suburban Propane out of Marlboro. They
are part of a big chain of SP's. You would need to plant a bottle
outside your house. They can plumb in the gas lines but I think
you need a plumber to do the water lines. It's "illegal" to do
your own plumbing in Mass.
BTW... did I mention that the water heater is power vented.
This allows you to put the heater just about anywhere. I put
mine over 20 feet clower to the bathroom. Now the shower has
nearly instant hot water.
Tim
|
58.279 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:05 | 14 |
| re: FHW heateing tanks
There are actually two types of systems....
- One uses the existing boiler tankless coil to heat the water and
store it in a tank. This system also uses a special bronze
circulating pump to move the water thru the coil when the tank
needs reheating.
- The other system is tank that has a heating coil in it. This one
is set-up as just like a heating zone, boiler water circulates
thru the coil in the tank and returns to the boiler.
Charly
|
58.280 | | NETCAD::DESMOND | | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:50 | 5 |
| We decided to go with the tank with a heating coil inside it. The
brand name is SuperStor. A 40 gallon tank is about $650. Installation
charges vary. Thanks for all the suggestions.
John
|
58.426 | Well - Too much water | RANGER::KILE::stetson | | Thu Dec 08 1994 22:03 | 24 |
| I'm in a new house with a new well. The well is 200 feet. It went off the
scale when they measured gal/min, but they estimate about 40. It's located
in the backyard which has been cut down about 10 feet from the natural
grade for a walk out basement. Anyway... The water is almost constantly
coming out of the well head. They left the well cap loose to allow it to
drain and put in some special drainage to divert the water away from the
house.
The problem: The water is making it's way into the PVC pipe that contains
the wire for the pump and leaking back down into the basement.
About 3 gallons a day.
We tried sealing the end of the PVC pipe in the basement but it's still
dripping. I think it needs to be fixed at the source.
One theory: If we raise the well to above natural ground level the static
pressure will not reach the well cap.
Or maybe, is there a type of special well cap that will allow runoff and
keep water from getting into the pump's PVC pipe?
Any Ideas?
bill
|
58.427 | sometimes you win, sometimes you lose | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Fri Dec 09 1994 10:57 | 6 |
|
You don't have a well, you have a man made spring.
Hope you're on good terms w/ your neighbors because you may get tapped to
pay for basement-flooding problems arising out of your having disturbed the
local water table. :-(
|
58.428 | | MOLAR::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dogface) | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:16 | 12 |
| Why do you have a submersible pump in the well with an artesian well like
that? You could get by quite nicely (or better) with a shallow well pump
in your cellar, which only really needs to pressurize your plumbing system.
This would quite obviously eliminate the need for the pipe with the wires
running to the well.
When you say you attempted to "seal" that pipe, how did you go about it?
Hydraulic cement usually does an excellent job for this type of thing.
Did you use something else?
-Jack
|
58.429 | | TARKIN::HARTWELL | Dave Hartwell | Tue Dec 13 1994 16:45 | 6 |
| Just cut into the well casing and add a outdoor faucett with a one-way
valve on the end. This will fix your problem in the basement and also
insure that it is not possible to contaminate the well.
/Dave
|
58.430 | Too much water - too | MRKTNG::NALLAN | | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:21 | 14 |
| I had (have) a similar well problem. My well taps into a vein which
swells with significant rainfall, spring thaw, etc. and will flood the
casing. The casing was designed with a runoff (1" plastic pipe, set
approx. 10' below the cap, 5' below the PVC wiring sleeve) that handles
the overflow before it spills into the wiring sleeve (and into the
basement). Exceptions have occurred when the overflow tube is clogged
with sediment, iron sludge, ice, etc. For those instances the well co.
recommended & installed a wellcap (don't know the name) designed to
permit overflow-it has 2 small relief holes under the cap fitted with
bearings which float & open for drainage when needed. This works well
to relieve the pressure until I can get the overflow cleared - but my
problems were related to seasonal changes, and I wasn't drawing the
constant pressure that you are experiencing. Hope this helps - good
luck.
|
58.384 | What are 'grounding loops'? | SSPADE::ARSENAULT | | Tue Jan 24 1995 13:43 | 8 |
| In .6, Steve says:
One thing you DON'T want to do is distribute ground wires elsewhere - you can
set up ground loops which can eat your pipes (as well as cause other problems).
Steve can you explain what you mean by this? Are you saying that one must have
one and only one ground in a system? What is a 'grounding loop'.
|
58.385 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jan 24 1995 15:37 | 15 |
| Ideally, everything that is "grounded" would be at zero volts relative to
"earth" potential. However, that's often not the case. For example, grounding
to a water pipe not near the service entrance can result in a differential
of several millivolts from true ground. If you then (through your house wiring)
hook up two or more of these ground points together, current will flow through
the pipe - a "ground loop". This electrical activity will corrode pipes
over time.
The phenomenon of ground loops is well known to audio and video users who
discover hum or video interference caused by multiple grounding sources
being hooked together (TV cable is a common source of this). Car audio
also can suffer from ground loops, which is why the serious installers
run ground wires to a central point rather than ground to the chassis.
Steve
|
58.386 | | SSPADE::ARSENAULT | | Wed Jan 25 1995 12:10 | 16 |
| I think you're saying that if you drive two or more metal stakes in the ground
and connect those stakes to your electrical and/or plumbing then a slight
current can flow causing problems.
The pipes do need to be grounded. The best method for grounding them is to
connect them to the ground in the service panel. That's preferred over
connected the pipes to their own separate grounding stake, because of the
possibility that the pipes are also connected to the electrical system ground
via a furnace, pump, hot water heating, etcetera.
Once the pipes are properly grounded, it is OK to use the pipes to ground other
things. For example, I recently grounded my new DSS satellite dish to my FHW
pipe.
Do you agree with all that?
|
58.387 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jan 25 1995 13:04 | 9 |
| It's normal to have two or even three ground rods, but they are supposed
to be connected together and meet your house's electrical system at a single
point.
If devices you ground to water pipes aren't also connected to the house
wiring ground, that's fine. If they are, then that's a ground loop and
trouble.
Steve
|
58.412 | oooh, oooh, that smell... | WRKSYS::CLEW::DeMers | | Fri Jan 27 1995 10:00 | 19 |
| I did it.
It worked.
No smell.
I'm happy.
/Chris
[from my water softener guy]
- pour in 2-3 gallons of regular bleach
- circulate water from outside spigot into well until you smell bleach
- go somewhere for 24 hrs (12 will work, but more is better)
- run all inside faucets, dishwasher, toilets, washing machine, etc. until
you smell chlorine
- run outside spigot into woods, whatever until chlorine smell is gone
- done!
|
58.413 | One caution | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Fri Jan 27 1995 12:55 | 6 |
| For the record, I think 2-3 gallons of bleach is too much. Our well is about
300 feet of water, and we were told to just put in one quart. Bleach is pretty
powerful stuff, so I don't know if you need as much as you used. Also, the more
you put in, the longer it will take to flush out afterwards.
Elaine
|
58.414 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Fri Jan 27 1995 13:30 | 2 |
| Yes, you need nowhere near that much. If you can taste it in the
water, it's plenty.
|
58.415 | 100 ppm does the trick | CSC32::J_MCCLELLAND | Off in the ETHERnet | Fri Jan 27 1995 14:43 | 14 |
| Colorado requires a 100 ppm chlorine solution for well disinfection.
The following table helps to see how much of dry or liquid chlorine
products make up a 100 ppm solution and is from the Colorado State
Rules and Regulations for Water Well Construction and Pump Instal-
lation Contractors, 2CCR 402-2, 1 August 1998.
Diameter of Volume of water Dry powder Liquid Bleach
water column in a 100' column 70% chlorine 5% chlorine
4" 65.6 (Gals.) .25 (Cups) 3 (Cups)
6" 147.0 .5 5
8" 261.0 .75 9
10" 408.0 1 14
12" 587.0 1.5 19
|
58.416 | Any side effects ?? | BIRDIE::ORLOWSKI | | Mon Jan 30 1995 08:39 | 5 |
|
What effect does the chlorine have on leachfields and septic tanks?
It will destroy the micro organisms in the tank for sure....
-Steve
|
58.417 | agreed - 3 gallons is probably too much | WRKSYS::CLEW::DeMers | | Mon Jan 30 1995 09:25 | 11 |
| One needs to clear the well of the remaining chlorine by going from the
well out the spigot and into the "woods" to avoid lots of chlorine in the
septic/leach. I flushed the inside lines just enough to get a whiff - then
I turned on the hose.
re: amount - I agree. If I have to do it again, I will probably go with a
gallon or less. The initial thought was that this was the first time and a
good shot would clear out the well for good. It -did- take a long time to
get rid of the smell.
/Chris
|
58.418 | | NOVA::FISHER | now |a|n|a|l|o|g| | Mon Jan 30 1995 10:00 | 5 |
| the old "if one is good, two is better" overkill.
Been there, done that. :-)
ed
|
58.793 | Pressure is too low | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Thu May 04 1995 13:58 | 17 |
| I have a problem with my well and I'm not sure what the problem is.
The pressure is ok - not great - as long as 1 faucet is running. As soon as
another faucet gets turned on or a toilet flushed the pressure drops way down.
I read the previous replies and tonight I'm planning to recharge the holding
tank with air. Does it sound like that will solve the problem? What else can I
check? Note that I have plenty of water, it's just a mater of pressure. As
soon as the other faucet is shut off the pressure comes right back. I've also
recently replaced the filter.
When I recharge the tank I need to repressurize until the pressure is
equal to the pump turn ON pressure. Ok, how do I tell what the pump turn-on
pressure is. Do I just turn the water on and watch the gauge to see when the
pump turns on? Is this accurate with a mal-functioning system?
Thanks,
George
|
58.794 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Thu May 04 1995 14:12 | 6 |
| Have you tried simply increasing the pressure? You can adjust both the
turn on point and the shut off point of the well pump. My system was
initially set to turn on at 30psi, and shut off at 50psi. I found that
range too low so I increased the turn on pressure to 50psi, and the
turn off pressure to 80psi. Suits me pretty fine now.
|
58.795 | | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Thu May 04 1995 14:25 | 10 |
| Can you arbitrarily increase pressure like that or does it need to be tied to
what your pump is capable of? If I increase pressure will I reduce the life of
the pump.
If I don't need to be concerned about that I'll give it a try if
re-pressurizing doesn't help.
Thanks,
George
|
58.796 | | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Thu May 04 1995 17:43 | 9 |
| I suppose you wouldn't want to create more pressure than the holding
tank was designed for. I don't know how to get that information.
Increasing the pressure will cause the pump to run longer, but we're
not talking about lots of time. Will you reduce the life of the pump?
Technically yes. On the other hand, if you never used your pump again
you'd significantly increase the life of the pump. But how practical
is that?
|
58.797 | I know the feeling | STRATA::MORIO | | Thu May 04 1995 21:49 | 15 |
|
My well is only about a year old but I have had many problems with
pressure due to sand,sediment,etc..., I have gone through filters
constantly. Evertime I clean my filter the pressure comes back. Finally
I had it out with the builder and he had the well company install a
seal in the casment of the well and the problems seems to be gone. I
can now run both outside faucets and use the shower at the same time
with no pressure lose. Do you get your pressure back after you replace
your filter? You may want to keep a good look at your filter. How old
is your well? Does the filter clog quickly? Sounds like you probably
already do this, but just a suggestion. It is nice to finally have
pressure and not have to constantly replace the filter and clean all
the screens on the faucets.
Tony
|
58.798 | more on low pressure problem | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Fri May 05 1995 09:53 | 16 |
| Last night I checked the pressure limits and the pressure in the tank.
The pump kicks on at 50 and off at 65. According to a tire gauge the pressure
is over 50 at the top of the tank. I need to get a better gauge to get a more
accurate reading. So, it looks like the pressure in the tank is ok and if
anything the pump turn on pressure is a little high. If I remember the previous
notes corrrectly it should be down around 45, right? I didn't have time last
night to replace the filter but I'll do that tonight. I replaced it about a
month ago. In the past I've left it in for 2-3 months before I saw any
appreciable pressure loss, and then it was an overall pressure loss anytime the
water was turned on. Not the dramatic loss in pressure I'm seeing now only if
more that one source is turned on.
Anything else for me to try?
George
|
58.799 | | MROA::MACKEY | | Fri May 05 1995 10:31 | 9 |
| I have similar problems that my pressure goes down to nill.
Some of you have mentioned replacing the filter?? Where is this
located? I have not seen one in my house. The water line comes
in, goes to the pressure tank and then to my water conditioning system.
Pressure is fine for about 5 minutes or so until the water in the tank
drops then when it is just recieving pressure from the pump it is
down to about 10psi.
|
58.800 | | STRSHP::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Fri May 05 1995 10:35 | 7 |
| re: .120
If you have a serious sediment problem, your pump could be too close to the
bottom of the well. We had this problem. The pump was raised about 40 feet
and the "junk in the water" problem disappeared.
Elaine
|
58.801 | | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Fri May 05 1995 15:17 | 11 |
| We had a different problem that manifested itself as low pressure -
actually, the pressure was fine the holding tank was full or if the
pump was on, but the pump wouldn't kick in until the pressure was down
to virtually 0. It turned out that we needed to have the valves on
the pump intake cleaned - something about the pressure switches not
working properly because they got clogged up.
fwiw,
- Tom
|
58.802 | | NUBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Fri May 05 1995 16:40 | 3 |
| See .110, this note.
Art
|
58.969 | Chlorox to well volume? | FIEVEL::FILGATE | Bruce Filgate SHR3-2/W4 237-6452 | Tue May 09 1995 13:38 | 7 |
|
Anyone got a table / value for how much chlorox to use in a well to kill
off the bacteria? With all the discussion, it appears no one ever put
in the number!
thanks,
Bruce
|
58.970 | See 5346.11 | XELENT::MUTH | I drank WHAT? - Socrates | Tue May 09 1995 13:50 | 0 |
58.281 | New house - sediment in well water | GODOT::MCDERMOTT | Chris McDermott | Fri Jun 02 1995 16:44 | 15 |
| I've been living in a new house for about a week. The well is also new and as
expected is throwing up some amount of sediment. This is espeacially a problem
with the close washer because the screen in the COLD water hose is repeatedly
clogging up. The hot water hose is fine. I suppose that is because the
sediment remains in the hot-water tank, which I will periodically flush by
partially draining from the bottom.
I've found other replies to this topic noting the same problem, but have not
seen any solutions to this particular problem.
How long should I wait before deciding that this problem is not going to go away
by itself, and if that's the case what can be done about it?
TIA,
Chris
|
58.282 | Sounds familiar | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Fri Jun 02 1995 17:16 | 18 |
| If you are new in the house, take the screens off all the faucets and run the
cold water through each for awhile (several hours). It's better if you don't
use the washer until this is done. For the washer, you will just have to keep
cleaning it out.
If the problem persists, as ours did, you have two options:
1) get a sediment filter for your line
2) have the people who installed the well pump come back and raise it up. Ours
was too close to the bottom of the well, so it was sucking up all kinds of
junk. When they start raising the pump from the casing, they will know where
your static water level is, so they will know how high they can safely raise
it. Our was raised 40 ft, and has been much less sediment since. We finally
made the call because the sediment was keeping a check valve from closing,
letting a lot of air into our pipes.
Elaine
|
58.283 | | LEFTY::CWILLIAMS | CD or not CD, that's the question | Fri Jun 02 1995 17:58 | 8 |
| With a well, you should have a sediment filter anyway. Almost any well
will occasionally have some junk in the water.
Raising the pump may have to done also. The sediment can jam the pump
if there is too much of it...
Chris
|
58.1046 | Need advice on buying/installing a sediment filter | 12485::MCDERMOTT | Chris McDermott | Mon Jul 17 1995 17:36 | 7 |
| After cleaning the intake screen on my washing machine three times a week since
we move into our new house, I've come to the conclusion that we need a filter.
Any advice on where to buy one (Westford, MA area), what to look for, how to
install one. Or am I better off getting a plumber to install it.
Thanks in advance.
|
58.1047 | Talk to the pump installers | HPS126::WILSON | | Mon Jul 17 1995 18:35 | 28 |
| I would suggest talking to a pump installer.
Wilmington Pump did my water pump installation for a heat pump system
and seemed reasonable to deal with. They suggested a screen assembly
for my problem that I have not yet acted on.
I use domestic water filters at my summer camp on both the lake and
well systems and consider them a must have. If you are just using the
water for normal houshold activities one should do the job, but note
the flow rating for the filter. If you are likely to have three or
more fixtures drawing at one time you are likely to need a high
capacity filter or put two or three in parallel.
My problem is a little different in that I need a high flow rate, up to
30 GPM, and during peak heating or cooling will circulate 15,000
gallons per day. A 30 GPM 100 micron screen was originally installed,
but my well when worked pretty hard would produce a very very fine
particle that would plug the screen. The only way I could get enough
water to the heat pump was to remove the screen. After a couple of
months I reinstalled the screen and things worked well. When the
cooling season arrived the very very fine particles returned and the
screen is again removed. Hopefully the fine particle problem will go
away and the screen will do the job. Otherwise it looks like an
industrial 100 GPM bag filter at about $800 to solve it.
After a a couple of months of
heating last winter
|
58.1048 | Covered else where too | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Jul 18 1995 10:32 | 19 |
| I believe this has been covered somewhere in here already, but a
new well will have sediment for a while. It takes some amount of time
for things to settle out.
It is possible that the pump is too close to the bottom. If this is
the case, any well company can move it up a bit. A whole house filter
can also be added for cheap money (about $35 if you can do it yourself.
If the stuff clogging your screen was similar to what I had, a
higher numbered micron filter is all you'll need (i.e 20 or up vs. 5).
You'll want to get some spare cartridges right away because you'll be
changing it about every month for a while.
FWIW - You'll probably find that you don't have as much of a
problem with the hot water (assuming you have a hot water tank of some
kind). This is because the water is drawn from the top of the tank and
the sediment will settle to the bottom.
Ray
|
58.1049 | < 5 GPM from well? Buying a new house! | HDLITE::PASHAPOUR | Disk space, the final frontier | Wed Jul 26 1995 14:15 | 37 |
| Hi,
I am about to buy my first house and what a great time I'm having
dealing with all sorts of stuff :-(. One thing that is bothering me
now, is the well.
I had it just tested yesterday. I have not seen the quality test
results, but the quantity test results are in.
This is what we have seen:
start 11:50 AM 4.5 GPM
12:20 PM 4.0
12:50 3.5
...
End 3:50 1.85 GPM
Water level stayed near constant - dropping ice cube takes 2-2.5
seconds throughout the test.
I was under the impression that it should do 5 GPM for 4 hours.
I have asked for the depth of the well certificate, but haven't seen it
yet.
Should I be alarmed about this rate? I (will) have a relatively large
lawn.
Can I drop the price of the house because of this? Or should I just
forget about it?
Appreciate all help in advance.
Amin
p.s. What else should I check for? p&s is this Friday.
|
58.1050 | Try a Well Expert | NETCAD::DRAGON | | Wed Jul 26 1995 17:28 | 21 |
|
Amin,
I'm no well expert but I think 5 GPM for 4 hours is a pretty high
standard. When they tested our well I believe that they used 3GPM
for 4 hours.
When we were closing we had problem with the well test. The home
inspector said that it failed. We were really concerned needless
to say, so we had a well contractor inspect it. In fact the
company which sunk the well also showed up at the sellers request.
They found no problems with the well.
I'm glad that we did not pass on the sale, and also glad that we
got another opinion. Also, our lawyer was able to get us extra
time on the closing for a second test. I'm no lawyer, but you might
also get a clause added that the sale agreement is void if a new test
fails. No water can be a serious and expensive problem.
Good Luck,
Bob
|
58.1051 | | MRKTNG::BROCK | Son of a Beech | Wed Jul 26 1995 18:09 | 7 |
| If it helps, my well is about 1.5gpm. But, my well is about 800 feet
deep, so I have a 'reservoir' of 273.5568 (approx) cubic feet of water.
I believe the low refresh rate is a factor of the depth of the well and
the 'ambient' pressure at the bottom. Shallow wells tend to refresh
faster than deeper wells.
If I leave the lawn sprinkler on all night, I can use it all up.
|
58.1052 | yikes. | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Thu Jul 27 1995 08:35 | 11 |
|
"273.5568 (approx)"
^
|
---- Yow! An approximation with 4 decimal places! I'd hate to
see how anal retentive you'd get if you were trying to
to be accurate! :-) :-) :-)
- Mac
|
58.1053 | | NETCAD::DRAGON | | Thu Jul 27 1995 09:32 | 4 |
|
I see pi in there somewhere:-)
bd
|
58.1054 | | HPS126::WILSON | | Thu Jul 27 1995 16:04 | 9 |
| re .0
That sounds like plenty of water unless you are planning a lot
of watering, or a pump and dump heat pump system.
The well will fill to the ground water level, and how much peak
flow rate and how much water you have in reserve is a function of
pump size, the depth of the pump, and how much water the well will
produce.
|
58.233 | clothing suffering | STRATA::SCHROLL | | Wed Aug 09 1995 12:44 | 12 |
| I, too, have a ph that's a bit low (6.0-6.5). I have the bluing problem
in the tub, as well. This doesn't bother me as much as what has been
happening to the clothing in my house. The elastic on shorts, socks,
and the collars on T-shirts have all begun erroding. I have shirts
that I've had for years that are now suffering from "collarstretch-out",
as well as recently purchased (months) shirts. The elastic reaches a
point were it no longer retracts.Has anyone else run into this problem,
or heard of it? I'm not sure if it's the ph of the water, or something
in the water (possibly copper) that's causing this. I purchased the house
2.5 years ago, and my water supply is a well. The house was built in
'48 -copper plumbing. HELP, and thanks in advance.
Rich
|
58.234 | Some for the lawn, some for the well... | LUDWIG::CASSIDY | Tim Cassidy, #365 | Wed Aug 09 1995 23:23 | 8 |
|
Bleach can destroy clothing. If you do use bleach, cutting back
might help reduce your problem. Acidic water will eventually destroy
your pipes.
You might be able to sweeten you water. Northboro has done this
with the well water they supply the town. Don't know how. Maybe
they add lime.
Tim
|
58.235 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Thu Aug 10 1995 08:31 | 1 |
| I think overheating in a dryer can also kill elastic.
|
58.236 | Been there...Done that... | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Thu Aug 10 1995 15:58 | 6 |
| I had an even lower ph in my well water. It was around 5.5. I had
an "acid neutralizer" water treatment system installed along with all
new water pipes. The neutralizer gets the ph around 7 and slightly
"hardens" the water...which wasn't a problem for me since the water
wasn't very hard to start with. It was around $600-700 for the water
treatment, I believe, which requires annual maintenance around $50.
|
58.237 | Could it be chlorine? | ASDG::SBILL | | Fri Aug 11 1995 08:52 | 6 |
|
That sounds like what happens to my bathing suits. I do most of my swimming in a
pool. After a while, the elastic waistband won't retract. I think the chlorine
somehow takes away its elasticity.
Steve
|
58.431 | Well-Water Holding Tanks | GROOVE::DADDIECO | That's Just The Way It Is ..... | Tue Aug 29 1995 17:06 | 7 |
58.432 | | HPS126::WILSON | | Wed Aug 30 1995 13:13 | 4 |
| Any water pump dealer.
Wilmington Pump did my pump system.
|
58.433 | Which kind of water tank should I buy? | STAR::HUSSAIN | | Sun Oct 08 1995 17:57 | 11 |
| I need to replace the water tank that is attached to my well. It is a
metal canister with an elastic balloon inside. There are two kinds
available --
1) The water goes in the balloon and never touches the canister.
Compressed air surrounds the balloon.
2) The air goes in the balloon. The water is in contact with the
canister.
Pros and cons?
|
58.434 | | TUXEDO::FRIDAY | DCE: The real world is distributed too. | Tue Oct 10 1995 11:04 | 23 |
| Personally, I'd go for 2), with the air in the balloon.
When we had to replace the tank for our well the plumber
used that kind of a tank. Unfortunately, the bladder
was faulty and had to be replaced. Unfortunately that
bladder was faulty and had to be replaced too.
Eventually the plumber found out that the bladders
were prone to failure and took it out altogether, so
that now there's just a pocket of compressed air
above the water. The only disadvantage we've seen so far
is that about once a year we have to recharge the tank,
a task we can do easily ourselves.
If we had had type 1) with the water in the bladder, and
it had failed, my suspicion is that it would have been
more difficult to fix.
Note that there are also fiberglass canisters available,
and I'd recommend using one of those instead of metal.
YMMV
|
58.435 | There is another system. | STAR::HUSSAIN | | Wed Oct 11 1995 12:04 | 7 |
| Thanks for the info.
There is another system. This one has no balloon inside. Instead
there is a diaphram that travels up and down like a piston.
Any idea as to how this compares with the balloon system?
|
58.436 | | 10166::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:54 | 7 |
| I'm facing this repair as well. Our tank doesn't seem to want to hold a
charge at all so the pump cycles for every water usage.
What's the ballpark cost for something like this (or is that a "how long is
a piece of string" question)?
j.
|
58.437 | Some pricing info. | STAR::HUSSAIN | | Fri Oct 13 1995 11:51 | 2 |
| Prices for a 40 gallon tank seem to range from $315 to $450. That
includes installation.
|
58.438 | Xref | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Wed Oct 18 1995 17:59 | 2 |
| 2259 RNGLNG::JORGENSEN 2-MAY-1988 58 Well pump and tank systems...
4292 XANADU::RECKARD 3-JUL-1991 2 Well tank plumbing ... what's this thingie?
|
58.1078 | Buzz.. click, buzz.. click, etc. etc....... | SALEM::LEMAY | | Mon Feb 12 1996 09:08 | 39 |
| Hi folks,
I've been through all the notes here on wells trying to understand
what's going on in my system. I'll have to elaborate later but I have
a question concerning the control box in my set-up.
System is a deep well submersible pumping from at about 280 feet that
I was loosing pressure on to the point of barely being able to operate
any appliances and take decent showers. It seemed as though the tank
(Weltrol)sp, lost it's charge so I followed the proceedures in here on
recharging and it helped. The set-up cuts in at 43 pps and off at 60.
What concerns me is that watching the guage shows that cut-in and cut-
off are working but when the pressure drops to the cut-in point there's
a series of buzzes and clicks in the control box (large capacitor)
before the pump actually starts. What I'm hearing is a long buzz
followed by a quick click, then repeat maybe 3-5 times until the pump
goes on. Then all's fine. I've observed this over the last week or
more. Now this morning, after not using the water all night, the tank
trained below the cut-in point and the pump didn't come on right away.
When I went down to check things the control box was going through this
cycle and did finally kick in.
Is the control box gone? Or is there a bigger problem with the pump
down in the hole not wanting to start as easy as it should? Pressure
is back to normal otherwise. Feeling the line from the well while
the control box goes through this cycle and it's like it's trying to
start but not kicking in altogether. You can feel the surge then it's
off again until it finally catches.
FYI. The whole system was overworked for who knows how long by two
toilets that never quite shut off caused by sediment in the system.
I'm looking into a sediment filter now.
Any comments?
Dick
|
58.1079 | Relay going south ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Mon Feb 12 1996 11:17 | 9 |
| Sounds like you're off into uncharted territory from my
perspective. Not for lack of well problems, just different ones. I've
had a pump go bad, but that tripped the pump breaker in the main panel.
It sounds like a possible relay problem. In my experience, the
pump is protected from over-current conditions by the breaker, not a
relay. Can you see the relay contacts to check for pits/burning ?
Ray
|
58.1080 | RELAY? | SALEM::LEMAY | | Mon Feb 12 1996 11:42 | 8 |
| By relay, do you mean the pressure regulated switch? If so I can check
the contacts as you mentioned. What troubles me is the sound comming
out of the control box. I've taken the cover off and it appears to be
primarilly a large capacitor mounted onto the cover that is
disconnected from several contacts when you remove the cover. I think
it's this capacitor that is bussing then clicks.
Dick
|
58.1081 | Yes | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Mon Feb 12 1996 12:40 | 4 |
| Yes, the pressure regulated switch. I'm not saying it's impossible,
but I wouldn't expect a capacitor to buzz, much less click.
Ray
|
58.1082 | Control Box Questions | SALEM::LEMAY | | Mon Feb 12 1996 15:12 | 13 |
| Thanks, I'll have to listen more carefully tonight. The 2 units are
within 3 inches of each other.
Anyone else recognize these symptoms? Can someone explain the purpose
of this capacitor in the system. The control box really looks like it
just houses the capacitor and the cap/cover assembly looks to be
designed such that it would easilly be replaced. As easy as a fuse.
Is the capacitor a component that would act this way or would it only
be a go/no go situation? Could it degrade to the point where it's
having difficulty kicking the pump into motion?
Dick
|
58.1083 | | EVMS::MORONEY | Never underestimate the power of human stupidity | Mon Feb 12 1996 16:34 | 6 |
| Are you sure it's a capacitor? Seems a rather odd place to mount one.
On the other hand many AC motors use capacitors to start them.
If the cap. was bad I'd expect the motor to buzz a lot and not spin,
not the cap itself.
-Mike
|
58.1084 | | GOOEY::WWALKER | hoonamana me bwango | Mon Feb 12 1996 16:40 | 28 |
| I noticed similar problems in the house we used to rent. It turns
out a bunch of things went wrong, but I thing the ultimate cause was
that the check value just above the pump (yep -- 200 feet below the
ground) corroded and died. Thus, everytime the tank filled up, it
would *slowly* siphon back to the well.
The other symptoms were as follows:
o The control box fried itself to death by continually cycling.
o We'd often run out of water, especially in the middle of a
shower. There's nothing safer than walking naked down in the
cellar covered with soap and water to go poke at the control
box to force the pump to come on.
o The bladder in the storage tank had burst (I didn't know about
this until after I recharged the thing about 5 times). I suspect
this is what caused the control box to continually cycle.
After I replaced the control box, the storage tank, and put a new check
valve in the house, my landlord ultimately broke down and finally
agreed to let the well dudes come and fix check valve on the pump.
I am by no means a well/pump expert, but the symptoms you describe
sound like there might be something wrong with the storage tank.
Especially if you say that recharging it helped a bit.
Will
|
58.1085 | Cap and Solid State Switch | SALEM::LEMAY | | Tue Feb 13 1996 09:10 | 10 |
| I checked the control box again last night. It consist of a capacitor
and a little module (2in x 1in) with a solid state start switch being
the main component. Listening closely this is what's making the noise.
It also is easilly removed.
I don't doubt that there are weaknesses in the system but at this point
it looks like everything is in order with the exception of this
control box.
Dick
|
58.1086 | Maybe both. | GAAS::KENNEDY | | Wed Feb 14 1996 12:46 | 13 |
| I have had these symptoms caused by both bad relays and bad capacitors.
The clicking is the relay that is turned on by the pressure sensitive
relay. I'm not real sure here but I think it connects the starting cap
to the AC motor for the pump. If the contacts of the relay are going
bad or are dirty you'll hear it click on and off until it gets a good
contact and the motor starts. If the cap has gone bad ( or maybe going
bad ) it'll still cause the relay to click in and out because the
motor is still not starting.
After TURNING OFF THE POWER the cover of the control box can be removed
and you can check the capacitor or clean the relay as applicable.
I have only had moderate short term success cleaning the relay contacts
and once made it worse.
jak
|
58.1087 | Some progress? | SALEM::LEMAY | | Thu Feb 15 1996 10:19 | 50 |
| Thanks for the input. Any more out there?
Calling around for the parts yielded some advise. The relay in the
control box is a solid state device and is what's making the noise.
A couple of sources I've talked to say that locating the relay itself
as a component is a crap shoot and they go for around $35. The whole
control box with the relay, cap, etc goes for $55 and is available in
town. Not knowing which is bad and/or both at this point they usually
swap out the whole panel. I recall the service person years ago doing
this when it had fried from being overworked due to a cracked pipe at
the base of the well. The installer used rigid pvc sections joined by
glue and did not use adequate torque suppressors. It was replaced by
the continuous black tubing and two, more robust and better installed
torque collars.
The solid state relay switch (Franklin Electric) has been obsoleted
and replace by another. Make's one wonder if it was a supply problem
or a quality one.
I think I'll take a shot at replacing the box itself. I may attempt to
test the components themselves per intructions I've found inside the
box if I can figure them out.
Anyone else recall the symptoms? What's happening lately is that first
thing in the AM when water is drawn for any reason the pressure will
drop to below the cut-in of 43 pps and the pressure activated switch
will most definitely kick in. At this point the pressure will drop
right off to 0 pps while the relay in the control box goes through
cycles of buzzes and clicks until one catches and the pump turns on.
This is usually about 6-7 cycles first thing in the AM or after a long
period of non-use like after returning from work. When we're around
and during normal use the relay will cycle 2-3 times at the cut-in
point and resume pumping before the pressure drops off.
I don't think it's a check valve problem as I'm not loosing tank
pressure while everything is idle. That's how I found that the two
toilets were running continuously by watching the guage drop ever so
slowly over a period of time. That's fixed and the guage stays rock
steady now.
Another curiosity. If there is a check valve at the base of the tank
and supposedely one at the pump is it intended as built in redundancy
or do they accomplish different task. So... should the check valve
at the pump croak, will the other still maintain the column of water
in the line and vice versa? I would think so?
Thanks folks.
Dick
|
58.1088 | | GOOEY::WWALKER | hoonamana me bwango | Thu Feb 15 1996 10:27 | 4 |
| The check valve in the house keeps the tank from draining, but
will not keep a column of water in the line. The height of the
line and gravity pulling on the water will form a vacuum in the
line if the check valve at the pump isn't doing its job.
|
58.1089 | One possibility ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Feb 15 1996 12:05 | 12 |
| Looking at one possibility makes for a plausible explanation, but
whether or not it's correct is another matter ;-)
During the day, the increased demand keeps the relay contacts
working. At night, the relay sits until the first thing in the morning.
If the contacts were starting to go in the relay, letting them sit idle
would make them less likely to establish a contact (i.e. the spring
that pulls the contacts back into it's normally relaxed state would be
at it's strongest after an extended break). Perhaps it's that extra
little bit of spring pull that's making the difference ?
Ray
|
58.1090 | Well, deep subject | SALEM::LEMAY | | Thu Feb 15 1996 12:23 | 11 |
| That's kinda what I thought also. Another thought, which is a little
scary, is that the pump's on it's way out and it takes a few more
kicks to get it going after it sits, like starting an out of tune car
but when it's 10 degrees out and there's 50 weight in it. The only thing
that keeps me thinking along the lines of the control box is the noise
the relay is making. Wishful thinking maybe???
We'll see.
Dick
|
58.1091 | Some consolation, maybe ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Feb 15 1996 13:14 | 11 |
| Again, I've had pump problems before and they seem to result in the
breaker for the well pump itself tripping. BTW - What got left out of
my previous reply is that the combination of the less than perfect
contacts and perhaps the coil itself getting weaker are perhaps why the
relay clicks in/out.
We did have a case where sediment appears to have gotten into the
pump and slowly seazed things up, causing the shaft from the motor to
the pump to snap. Again, it popped the pump breaker.
Ray
|
58.1092 | | SALEM::LEMAY | | Fri Feb 16 1996 11:09 | 33 |
| You've reminded me that I was going to get into more detail of my
situation and how it all started.
About two weeks ago something occured (don't know what), that caused
blast of sediment to be sucked up into the system then the problems
seemed to stem from there. The water pressure had slowly dropped off
over several months but that could be attributed to the the system
overworking and and the tank pressure dropping.
I've been watching the water for sediment and only notice a speck or
two from time to time which may be from what's in the pipes and
being disturbed when the waters run. I've had to clean all the screens
and flush the boiler, etc to clear the sediment and it seems that it
was substantial but is ok now.
All of the above and the comments in -1 is what's caused me to
speculate about the condition of the pump if the control checks out.
What are the symtoms of a pump going south? How long should it take
for my tank pressure to get from 43 to 60 without anything running?
I've timed it at about 3 minutes last night. Before charging the
tank it would shoot up from around 48 to 60 in seconds like 2-3. I
took that to mean that there wasn't sufficient pressure in the tank to
begin with. The cut in and cut off pressures seem high by comparison
to other notes seen in here. I know the well guy increased it a
couple of years ago when I complained of low pressure. I take it
there's a trade off in increasing the pressures in that you cause
the pump to work harder building pressure each time. Maybe that
trade off is recovery time but 3 minutes?
Dick
|
58.1093 | No water? | AKOCOA::ROLLINS | five fuzzies | Fri Feb 16 1996 13:29 | 17 |
| Hi - this might be totally stupid but how do you know if you
need to prime or bleed the air out...we haven't had water
for a while and as it's been cold in NE the last week we
assumed the pipes had frozen. We put a heater in the
waterpump area to warm them up and still nothing comes
out of the faucets. We have a 1/2 hp pump with a 125 g
tank and a shallow (spring fed) well.
The pump just runs and doesn't get up any pressure at all.
We have to turn off the circuit breaker to shut the thing
up.
Should we prime/check its feet, bleed?
thanks,
beth
|
58.1094 | (East side if in England, Australia, or Japan...) | SMURF::wolf95.zk3.dec.com::PBECK | Paul Beck, WASTED::PBECK | Fri Feb 16 1996 17:19 | 4 |
| > What are the symtoms of a pump going south?
Well, if you find it on the west side of the road with its thumb out...
|
58.1095 | ex | SALEM::LEMAY | | Mon Feb 19 1996 11:18 | 15 |
| re. -2
Beth, I'd try to narrow it down some by taking a look into the
well if it's at all possible. At least you'ld know if the base
of the pipe/line is under water and you might discover a problem
with a break, air leak, or something.
I'm also curious as to whether air in the line is a problem and
how one would prime it. I'm speculating that if the pump is in the
house and pulling water then priming is necessary but a pump in the
bottom of a well is pushing water and therefore priming is not
necessary. Just thoughts to consider.
Dick
|
58.1096 | | AKOCOA::ROLLINS | five fuzzies | Mon Feb 19 1996 12:51 | 7 |
| I don't know what happened, or why, but the water came
on all by itself on Saturday. I am assuming it
was frozen somewhere along the line? Strange.
thanks,
beth
|
58.1097 | Problem solved for now | SALEM::LEMAY | | Fri Feb 23 1996 09:27 | 22 |
| I guess my worse case scenario was not the problem this time.
Everything checked out fine and back to normal once I replaced
the control panel of the control box. I spent a good deal of
time clearing out the screens, replacing washers, etc. on all
the fixtures and appliances from the sediment that made it's
way into everything. Guess it's time for that sediment filter
although I'm still curious as to what happened to cause a blast
of sediment to come up that way. There doesn't seem to be any
more comming through other than what was loosened up yesterday
after the system resumed regular pressure.
It's been mentioned before in here that before the well runs out
of water you'll get dirty water pumped up. Why does that occur?
Doesn't the water just drop below the submersible pump and it
runs dry until the fuse or breaker trips?
It felt good to take a shower without the water cutting out and
counting the clicks while you wait for the control box to decide
if you rinse or not.
Dick
|
58.1098 | A possible explanation | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Fri Feb 23 1996 09:37 | 15 |
| This is only a theory, but here's a shot at the "why". A drilled
well is fed via a number of veins. If you have a good recovery rate,
you may never drain your well down enough for it to significantly draw
from some of the lower veins.
I've been told that all of the precipitation we've had takes months
before it will sink down into the earth to replenish a well, especially
a deep well. Keep in mind that we did have a drought this summer.
I suspect the drought lowered your static level. Further use
drained your well below a seldomly used vein. Sediment, along with the
water, was drawn from the vein at a faster rate than normal, hence the
"burst of sediment" as the vein reopened.
Ray
|
58.1099 | | WRKSYS::THOMAS | Stop, look and listen | Wed Feb 28 1996 10:46 | 5 |
| Another cause of sediment is when the working level drops far below the
static level. Some of the veins may then be exposed allowing the water
to pour into the well stirring up all kinds of junk. This is what I was
told happened to ours when the kids left the garden hose turned on over
night. We didn't run out of water but it did get dirty.
|
58.1100 | How do I install a well for a sprinkler system | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant, VMS Engineering | Tue Apr 02 1996 11:30 | 28 |
| I didn't see much about DIY installation of a well for a lawn sprinkler. If
I've missed it, I'll happily go look elsewhere :-)
I live in a new house which really needs watering help to get the lawn going.
The house itself is about 3 feet or so (in the basement) above the water table.
In addition, the back of the house is about 50-75 feet from the edge of the
conservation/wetlands behind the house.
What I have been thinking about doing is sinking one or more well points and
connecting them to a pump which would then feed a holding tank. This tank
would then go through the appropriate fittings to the sprinkler system. I
have many of the various pieces worked out, but there a a few things I'm not
sure how to do to het the whole system working.
What I am concerned about is what type of like to use for the run from the
well points to the pump. I won't need to run the pump in the winter, but I
am wondering what I should do to prevent freezing damage. I don't really
relish the idea of placing the line below the frost line (4 feet down here
in NH).
Another thing I'm wondering about is there to put the filter to keep sediment
from clogging everything up.
Any sage words of wisdom?
Thanks in advance.
- Mark
|
58.1101 | | 4498::MENDEL | Please interconnect safely. | Tue Apr 23 1996 12:40 | 17 |
| Hi.
The well guy is going to put a sediment filter for the motor at the
bottom of my well. (That's ok.)
He says that, if my well uses "PVC #40" (?) pipe, and he's pretty sure
that it does, then he wants to replace it with new continuous pipe, or
"he won't be responsible for what happens". This #40 stuff is supposed
to be too fragile to be allowed to exist in my well. That's $.70 x 500
feet equals $350 tacked on to my bill.
Is he for real? What's the deal? Anyone have any info on this?
If this is legit, then I would want to do it since he's pulling up the
motor anyway. If it's bogus, I want to tell him no but thanks for asking.
Kevin
|
58.1102 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/L31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Apr 23 1996 16:24 | 14 |
| Hmmm...what does he expect to have happen? If the PVC Schedule 40
pipe is what I think it is, it's what I've got, and what zillions
of other wells have, and I've never heard of any significant problem
with it.
Of course, if your well is fairly old (20+ years or something) it
might be worth replacing the pipe just for peace of mind. But it
sounds a bit to me as though the guy is trying to sell you pipe.
You might try calling another pump and/or well place to see what they
have to say. I don't know where you are, but Scott Associates in
Clinton, Mass., seems pretty reliable, as does E.R. Sullivan in
Bolton, Mass.
|
58.1103 | | HYLNDR::BROWN | | Tue Apr 23 1996 17:26 | 8 |
|
Isn't Schedule 40 PVC the standard white stuff used for wastewater?
I've never seen it used for pressurized systems such as pump to
house before, but who knows. The continuous black pipe is different
than the schedule 40 pvc. The black stuff is a lot tougher and is
what I'm use to seeing betweeen well and house.
|
58.1104 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/L31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Apr 24 1996 09:22 | 8 |
| RE: .1103
No, there are 20' (I think) lengths of threaded plastic pipe
that is used to go down into the well. I assume that's what
is being discussed. Now, if that is *not* what it is, and if
it really is the standard wastewater PVC, then I'd agree that
it is probably not suitable and ought to be replaced.
|
58.1105 | | EVMS::MORONEY | Montana: At least the cows are sane. | Wed Apr 24 1996 12:21 | 6 |
| FWIW, I bought some 3" Sched 40 standard wastewater PVC and according
to markings on it it is rated for something like 265 psi.
In a well I'd expect there _may_ be trouble from the pump switching
on twisting the pipe. It may be too brittle for such use over
time.
|
58.1106 | When chatting with the installers while getting our pump replaced last month | UHUH::TALCOTT | | Wed Apr 24 1996 14:15 | 6 |
| We started talking about deep wells. Guy was saying for wells X feet deep PVC
was okay and for over X feet they went to steel for casing. Afraid I can't
remember what X was but you may be close (our pump is 280' down & we have PVC).
T'was Policy Well & Pump doing our work (800-992-7867).
Trace
|
58.1107 | | 4498::MENDEL | Please interconnect safely. | Wed Apr 24 1996 14:43 | 39 |
| Wow. Thanks for the responses! I had searched in here and come
up with nothing much, so I figured it was a one-in-a-zillion
chance anyone would know what I was talking about.
>>> Hmmm...what does he expect to have happen? If the PVC Schedule 40
>>> pipe is what I think it is, it's what I've got, and what zillions
>>> of other wells have, and I've never heard of any significant problem
>>> with it.
He said something about it being prone to cracking or flaking or
something. He was a lot more interested explaining how "everyone was
having it removed" then on exactly why that was so. Of course, I
didn't catch on to this at the time I was talking to him.
>>> Of course, if your well is fairly old (20+ years or something)
2 years.
>>> No, there are 20' (I think) lengths of threaded plastic pipe
>>> that is used to go down into the well. I assume that's what
>>> is being discussed.
I'm pretty sure that that is correct.
Speculation: Well Guy considers 20' sections annoying because the
the extra labor coming up and going down cuts into his profits, as
opposed to the 500 foot continuous flexible pipe.
>>> You might try calling another pump and/or well place to see what they
>>> have to say. I don't know where you are, but Scott Associates in
>>> Clinton, Mass., seems pretty reliable, as does E.R. Sullivan in
>>> Bolton, Mass.
Thanks for those names! I called one just now, and the answer was that
there was no real reason to replace it. Let's see what the other one
says ...
Kevin
|
58.1108 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/L31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Apr 24 1996 15:27 | 4 |
| Sounds like it's nothing to worry about. But I might think about
hiring somebody else who's not trying to sell you stuff you don't
need.
|
58.1109 | X = 600' | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Mon Apr 29 1996 13:11 | 13 |
| A little late (on vacation last week), but I was told by Water
Center in Manchester, NH that 600' is the magic number where you have
to go from plastic to metal pipe.
It is much easier for them to pull the continuous plastic pipe. It
probably works out about the same in cost to pull though, because they
use a special truck-mounted rig to pull the continuous stuff and get
some minimum amount just to have the truck on-site.
Ray
BTW - I would not recommend Water Center for reasons that I will get
into via mail (not here) if anyone is actually interested.
|
58.1110 | | 4498::MENDEL | Please interconnect safely. | Mon Apr 29 1996 16:50 | 20 |
| Hi, all. Here's the post mortem.
I talked to four or five professionals, and received a variety of
answers. Some said yes, the schedule 40 needs immediate replacing.
Some said no way. Some said #40 isn't ideal, but if its new leave
it for a while. There was no clear answer. (One recognized the
company I was working with just from my description of the problem -
disconcerting!)
I was leaning - ever so slightly - towards going ahead and replacing
the #40.
But, fortunately, my prayers were answered, and it wasn't the #40
after all but the #80.
I ended up getting good service otherwise. Of course, I was on top
of the situation the entire time, asking him what and why at every
step.
Kevin
|
58.1111 | Almost artesian | SALEM::LEMAY | | Wed Oct 23 1996 16:15 | 28 |
58.1112 | Question about old tank | FOUNDR::DODIER | Double Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Jan 29 1997 09:30 | 33 |
| Well, I found a few notes on recharging the well holding tank. Far
as I can tell I:
1. Turn off breaker for the well pump
2. Connect a hose to faucet at bottom of tank
and drain water out
3. Close drain faucet and add 2 PSI less air to the tank than
the lower pressure limit setting
A couple problems though. I can't find the air (Schraider ?) valve
on my tank, and the pressure guage on the pump control is frozen. I
suppose I could find the pressure guage somewhere and replace that.
My tank is a large, old, made by Sears tank. It's probably either a
diaphram, or perhaps even just one with air only. There is a plastic
line that runs from a connector on the tank to the pump control box.
Below that is what appears to be a brass hex-type cap. My problem is
that I don't know if this cap has the air valve under it. If it doesn't,
and I remove it, I may lose what air pressure I do have and be left
with no way to fill it.
Has anyone ever seen and dealt with one of these older style tanks
that may be able to offer clues as to where this air valve may be ?
I'll probably replace it at some point in the near future, but I'd like
to just recharge it for now as cash tends to be tight just after the
new year and into the heating season.
Ray
BTW - The water pressure and pump cycle too quickly (every couple of
seconds when water is running). It has only been noticable for about a
week. I did turn the pump off and open a faucet. Though it runs for a
while, the pressure drops off drastically in under 5 seconds.
|
58.1113 | easy fix = no extra air pressure | BAGUA::BRENCH | | Thu Jan 30 1997 11:05 | 16 |
| I have a couple of wells and the old one has a non-diaphram tank with
no way to put air into the system. I simply drain it by shutting off
the pump, and opening a plug near the top to let the air in while
draining through a hose. Then reseal the plug and start it up again.
This does not get you the maximum benefit from the tank as it has to be
pumped up to pressure by water but it will greatly reduce the cycle
time for your pump. While you have the top plug out you can replace it
with a air inlet and then you will be able to pre charge it properly.
(I didn't do this as I am only using this well for watering).
The pump will get some rest when the tank has some air in it, and fwiw
my older tank is oversized compred to the diaphram tank so I suspect
that the draw down is similar.
Colin..
|
58.1114 | DIY after that | FOUNDR::DODIER | Double Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Jan 30 1997 13:12 | 7 |
| I did try draining it and refilling it. There were no valves to
open that would let air in as it was draining. I called a local guy
who said he'd come over and we'd do it together. He also said that if
it didn't have an air valve that he'd put one on. Cost for his services
are $45. Not too bad, so I figured I'd go for it.
Ray
|
58.1115 | Attended well tank 101 ;-) | FOUNDR::DODIER | Double Income, Clan'o Kids | Fri Jan 31 1997 12:17 | 20 |
| Had a guy from Beeline Well and Pump come out yesterday. I think
he's out of Derry. I had the pump breaker off and the tank draining when
he got there. Anyway, we took a plug off, added a small threaded piece of
pipe with a T. On the front facing part of the T was a sifter (?) aka -
air valve, and he put a new pressure guage on the end of the T.
Once the valve was installed, he closed the valve on the output
side of the tank (which was after the drain faucet) and he used a
compressor to make sure all the water was blown out of the tank. There
was still quite a bit in there. Once it was empty, he closed the drain
valve and added 20 P.S.I. and then turned the well pump breaker back
on. The upper limit was set at 72 PSI according to the new guage.
He then turned the pump breaker back off and opened the drain
valve. We heard to low limit switch click at 50 PSI. He then drained
the tank again and added 48 PSI. Done. Labor was $45 and it was $13.50
for the parts. Aside from getting it fixed, I now know exactly how to
do this.
Ray
|
58.1116 | | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Mon May 12 1997 08:45 | 24 |
| I was up at a friend's cabin last weekend. It was the first time
the cabin was opened this year and we never got the well pump
running corectly. Here's the setup. The well is not
drilled, it is a well point. The line runs into the cabin to a pump
that sits on top of the holding tank. I believe the tank is
a pressure tank since there is an air valve at the bottom.
Everything was disconnected so the first thing Bill had to do
was connect the well line to the pump. At that point, the pressure
gauge read zero. When the pump was switched on he couldn't get the
pump to pump anything for a long time. It was like it wasn't primed.
When we finally got the water running there was air in the line which,
after running the water a while, seemed to get pumped out. The
pressure gauge went up to around 45 and the pump kicked off. If the
water was used frequently the pump would continue to kick on at
around 25 lbs and kick off at around 45. If however, it wasn't used,
for, say, 20 - 30 minutes. The pressure in the tank dropped to
zero and the pump just pumped air again. At one point I believe
that Bill let some air out of the tank to see if that helped.
This is the first time that Bill started the pump himself.
In the past he has had someone come in and get everything going
the first time. Any ideas on how to get the system running properly?
George
|
58.1117 | | MILORD::BISHOP | The punishment that brought us peace was upon Him | Mon May 12 1997 09:08 | 7 |
| swag....
There's a connector somewhere that isn't tightened completely. Not
enough to let water out that you can see, but enough to let air in.
All that water used to prime the pump is now back in the well again!
- Richard.
|
58.1118 | | skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHER | Gravity: Not just a good idea. It's the law! | Mon May 12 1997 13:31 | 6 |
| Might also be a bad foot valve (I think it is called): It is essentially a
check valve at the end of the hose down in the well. I'm not much into wells,
but I know this was a common problem at my parents cottage where we pumped water
of the lake.
Burns
|
58.1119 | Pin hole, tighten the clamp | TLE::MCCLURE | | Mon May 12 1997 14:32 | 15 |
|
My guess would be there is a tiny hole in the pipe from
the well to the pump. Think of it as a giant straw. If you fill
it with water and put your finger tightly over the top, water will
stay in it indefinitely. If you let a tiny bit of air in the water
drains back into the well. A foot valve is like putting your finger
on the bottom of the pipe when you aren't pumping. It might help,
as long as it seals the bottom. But eventually (or sooner if sand
gets in it) it will give problems also.
The most likely place for the pin hole is where you fastened
the pipe to the pump. I'd suggest you put a second hose clamp on it
and this time tighten it like you meant it. If that doesn't fix it,
the next step is to find the tiny leak. Sometimes you can hear it
if you listen very closely.
|
58.1120 | | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Mon May 12 1997 15:57 | 5 |
| If the system is sealed (no leaks) should the holding tank maintain a
pressure when it is empty because of the pressurized membrane?
Should that be the pump turn-on pressure?
George
|
58.1121 | another though | ASDG::DFIELD | the Unit | Tue May 13 1997 11:54 | 11 |
| Depends. Some holding tanks have no membrane and will let the air
bubble out of the tank when the water level is low enough.
It sounds like the leak senario is the likely culprit.
You might try charging the tank and closing the closest valve to
the tank (between the tank and pump) overnight. If the pump retains
it's prime then I'd start with the foot valve (check valve). If not,
then look for a leak between the pump and tank.
DanF
|
58.1122 | | EVMS::MORONEY | vi vi vi - Editor of the Beast | Tue May 13 1997 17:17 | 4 |
| I would guess a bad foot valve as well, but a small air leak at the connection
is also a possibility. It could also be a bad check valve at the pump input
but it would lose pressure but leave the input line filled with water not air.
|