T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1485.1 | So far, so good. | WMOIS::WEIER | Wings are just a place to hang Ailerons | Mon Jan 18 1993 12:02 | 20 |
|
Disclaimer: I am not an electronics expert ( to say the least! :), so
I don;t know if there are any bad long term effects to
using a 6.0 pack.
I recently bought a 6.0v 250mah pack at RC Buyers to give it a try.
I originally went in to purchase a 4.8v pack, but Bob mentioned he had
5 cell packs that several people had been running with good success. I
was concerned about the reciever being able to handle the high voltage,
but he said several people had been using them successfully with
several different brands of radios. I decided to give it a try, and am
using it with an RCD reciever.
Supposidly, the advantage is greater servo speed. I have flown
once with it installed, and to be frank, didn't notice any difference
in a fun fly type airplane. Maybe the difference will become more
apparent in future flights, we'll see.
Dan
|
1485.2 | Overvoltage Concern | DV780::BEATTY | | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:44 | 16 |
| I called Futaba in Irvine, California today to discuss narrowband
conversion prices and options on one of my radios. I asked the Futaba
rep (who was a tech) if I could use 6.0V batterys with a Futaba
reveiver. He said there would be no problem that the receivers were
designed to handle up to 6.0V. Now I'm wondering if I should install a
resister or somthing on the wire between a 6.0V battery and the Rx to
kill any early over 6.0V current that initially comes from the battery.
I understand that when you take a good nicad battery off of a charger it
initially puts out slightly over its rated voltage for a short period.
I understand that a 4.8V battery can put out 5.3V for a short period of
time. I want to make sure that early voltage won't fry my new receiver
or cause any long term cumulative damage that eventually kills my Rx.
Im going to call the folks at SR and see what they think, I will post
their answer here
Will
|
1485.3 | 5 vs 4 cell Receiver Pack | LEDS::WATT | | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:54 | 14 |
| Most RX systems will run with a 6V pack but I wouldn't recommend it.
Your receiver has a voltage regulator that will run hot and your servo
amplifiers may run hotter and be more prone to failure. The main
advantage is faster servo transit times and higher servo torque.
Another slight advantage is that you can have a cell short and still
have four good ones. By the way, you will NOT get longer flying time
with a 6V pack vs a 5.2V one. You might even have shorter safe
duration because the current draw could be slightly higher depending on
how the servos and receiver behave with higher supply voltage. If you
want to carry the extra weight, I'd recommend using four cells of
the next size up in capacity.
Charlie
|
1485.4 | More volts - poor servos???. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:55 | 20 |
| What makes you think that you would notice greater servo speed. ;-)
Full-up is Pull-up right?. :-(
The answer to the 5-cell pack question is that certain brands need five
cells to perform up to spec.
The pattern guys started using five cells to get consistant responses
from their "high-speed" servos. Unless you are having problems I would
not go to five cells. Due to the complications that they pose to regular
cyclers and chargers.
Some pattern guys go so far as to charge up between every flight. They
are so much in tune with their planes that the slightest servo
performance deviation can throw them off their routine.
Can't say it's affected me yet???.
E.
|
1485.5 | No - Don't put in a Resistor | LEDS::WATT | | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:58 | 11 |
| Will,
Do not put a resistor in series with the pack. This can cause big
voltage transients when the servos pull power from the pack. Just
curious, but why would you want to run 6V? Your standard charger won't
charge it properly and the system was designed to run on 5.2V. I saw
an article about 5 cell RX packs in one of the mags recently and only
one manufacturer recommended against using 5 cells in their equipment.
You can do it, but don't put in a resistor!
Charlie
|
1485.6 | 5 cells? UK Gliding | SHIPS::HORNBY_T | | Tue Jan 19 1993 08:08 | 5 |
| Good or bad.. the big gliding boys and the F3F'ers in our area have been
doing it (5 cells @ 1.2v)for several years, after all the radios are
still specified to work on dry cells which are 1.5v each..
Trev.
|
1485.7 | Why 6.0V | DV780::BEATTY | | Tue Jan 19 1993 13:38 | 25 |
| The reason why I have been considering 6.0V packs is because I am
building a quarter scale Citabria. I thought there might be some
benefit from the additional power to the large servos.
On a secondary note I may have stumbled across somthing of interest. I
ran two futaba flat Rx packs in two different planes (same packs) over
two consecutive years four years ago. These were 4.8V 500MaH packs run
on two separate on/off switches. I have been going through all of my
nicads with an ACE Digipace to determine their health. These two flat
packs were always run and charged identically. They both tested right
at 500 MaH this week! I talked to a local RC fan who told me that if
you don't heavily discharge nicads they will last a long time. I am
just amazed that at five years old these things have such excellent
output remaining. For what its worth they were never in a plane that
crashed, they were always well foam padded and both planes had soft
mounted engines.
I like to think I err on the conservative side with my RC flying.
Given the potential for harming the Rx over time I may just stick with
4.8V packs with a 1200MaH rating and run a pair of them for redundancy.
I appreciate all the feedback!
Will
|
1485.8 | Good Idea | LEDS::WATT | | Wed Jan 20 1993 17:05 | 7 |
| Will,
I think that's the right idea. Go with 1200 packs with 4 cells.
Keep them charged when not in use and don't overcharge them and they'll
last a long time. You can run lots of servos on a 1200 pack.
Charlie
|
1485.9 | 1200 and also 1800's | SHIPS::HORNBY_T | | Thu Jan 21 1993 07:04 | 5 |
| Will,Charlie,
I think 1800's are also available in the same case size.
Trev
|
1485.10 | Lots of sizes and shapes out there | GAUSS::REITH | Jim 3D::Reith MLO1-2/c37 223-2021 | Thu Jan 21 1993 07:40 | 5 |
| Yeah, check around the battery manufacturers. At last year's WRAMS show
I got a couple of 1000maH packs thaty were slightly longer AA cell
configurations. Since I generally end up using nose weight in my gliders,
these slipped into the same space (albiet a little longer) and the nose
weight was useful. They had 1300maH in the same form factor.
|
1485.11 | Careful | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Jan 21 1993 09:08 | 10 |
| Be VERY careful with high capacity packs for RX. They are supposedly
much more sensitive to Vibration. The cell construction is much weaker
to make room for extra active material in the same cell size. Some ads
even say not recommended for airborne packs. You can get 1400 cells
that are pushed 1200's that should be good. The 1700 and 1800's are
the SCE type which I wouldn't use for RX. The SCR type are very
rugged.
Charlie
|