T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1454.1 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Fri May 24 1991 14:09 | 5 |
| 6 is an awkward one - if you answer before June 1 (or is it July 1?)
the answer is (c), otherwise (a) :-).
Jeff.
|
1454.2 | I think? | COMICS::HWILLIAMS | | Fri May 24 1991 14:19 | 21 |
| Here's what I think, on some of the questions.
1, b I remeber reading that a new law was out, but when its
implemented I cant remember
2 b IMO
3 ? at a guess a?
4 I think advisory, only the round red ones used in roadworks are
compulsory.
5 ? at a guess 1/2?
6 as in .-1 depends when, i think now (ie 24/5/91) is is c?
7 I guess a because they're very safe
Hope this helps.
Huw.
|
1454.3 | To the best of my knowledge | CHEST::LEECH | I say what I like..... | Fri May 24 1991 14:20 | 31 |
|
I think the following are correct, sorry i couldnt help with the rest.
1. A qualified driver may accompany a learner if they meet certain
criteria - what are the criteria?
a) aged 18, full licence 1 year
*b) aged 21, full licence 3 years
c) aged 25, full licence 3 years
4. Speed limits shown by electronic signal on M-ways are advisory or
mandatory?
Mandatory.
6. Where fitted, it is compulsory for rear belts to be worn by :
a) all passengers
b) only if under 5' tall
*c) children under 14
d) on motorways
Good luck !
Shaun
|
1454.4 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Fri May 24 1991 14:27 | 3 |
| I disagree with 4 in .3, and 6 is about to change as said before.
Jeff.
|
1454.5 | Well, at least I tried. | CHEST::LEECH | I say what I like..... | Fri May 24 1991 14:33 | 6 |
| Well it was only "To the best of my knowledge" ...
doesn't say much eh ;^)
Shaun.
|
1454.6 | 2p | DOOZER::JENKINS | feeling 'ken shabby | Fri May 24 1991 15:39 | 8 |
|
I think .3 and the speed limits is correct and that the 'advisory'
speed limits set up are now compulsory. I know they didn't use to
be ;-) and that the police had to apply for 'planning permission'
or somesuch to change the speed limit .
R.
|
1454.7 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Fri May 24 1991 16:05 | 5 |
| If you're right - when, where and how was this announced, and how is
the poor motorist supposed to keep up with the changes?
Jeff.
|
1454.8 | With a big pinch of ;-) | DOOZER::JENKINS | feeling 'ken shabby | Fri May 24 1991 16:35 | 6 |
|
I think the idea was you were always *supposed* to obey even
the 'advisory' speed limits!
|
1454.9 | | MARVIN::RUSLING | Hastings Upper Layers Project Leader | Fri May 24 1991 16:46 | 6 |
|
How do you keep up with the changes? When was the last time you
bought a highway code? Plus, ignorance is no excuse in the eyes
of the law.
Dave
|
1454.10 | 'twernt for the written, Colin would be F300 now | ULYSSE::COLLINS | | Fri May 24 1991 16:48 | 6 |
| I think 2 will be (c): trevelling to fast ;-)
Officialdumb policy is "speed kills", never mind the contributing
factors, including following too close, dangerous passing, dangerous
lane changing, stupidity, etc.
russ
|
1454.11 | Oh no they're not | VOGON::KAPPLER | but I manage ... | Sat May 25 1991 13:38 | 6 |
| I beleive the electronic spped limit displays are still advisory. The
new legislation allowed temporary speed limits, but these must comply
with the the normal signing requirements, e.g. Numbers in Red Circles
on both sides of the carriageway, repeaters, etc,etc.
JK
|
1454.12 | Current Status = not enough! | VOGON::DAWSON | Turn ignition on - Turn brain off! | Tue May 28 1991 11:20 | 47 |
| So, thanks to you all so far! although most of the replies debated
the advisory/mandatory question and I have only two responses from
which to guage the right answers!!! Any other suggestions would be
welcome!!
Cheers,
Colin
PS Anyone else thinking of entering? It's great fun!!!
What I think I've got so far is :
1. A qualified driver may accompany a learner if they meet certain
criteria - what are the criteria?
b) aged 21, full licence 3 years FROM 2 RESPONSES
2. What is the most common cause of motorway accidents?
b) travelling too close
OR
c) travelling too fast
3. How many pedestrians are killed or injured on pedestrian crossings
each year?
a) 1500 FROM 1 RESPONSE
4. Speed limits shown by electronic signal on M-ways are advisory or
mandatory?
2 ADVISORY
1 MANDATORY
5. If all rear seat passengers were restrained, the DoT assess that
fatal and serious injuries would be reduced by :
c) 1/2 FROM 2 RESPONSES
6. Where fitted, it is compulsory for rear belts to be worn by :
c) children under 14 (current rule) FROM 2 RESPONSES
7. M-ways carry 15% of motor vehicle traffic - what percentage of
accidents causing injury occur on them?
a) 2% FROM 1 RESPONSE
|
1454.13 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Tue May 28 1991 11:41 | 9 |
| OK, if you want another (reasoned) guess: for 2 I would say travelling
too close is the most common cause of motorway accidents.
Travelling too fast is not a cause in itself, though the faster you go,
the closer you get if maintaining the same distance, if you get my
drift. Also, you tell me how long a piece of string is, and I'll tell you
what "travelling too fast" means.
Jeff.
|
1454.14 | you can't get better than a.... | DOOZER::JENKINS | feeling 'ken shabby | Tue May 28 1991 13:23 | 8 |
|
Seen/heard in a Kwik-fit (sp? who cares?) advert....
"The wearing of rear seat belts, where fitted, will be compulsory
from July 1, 1991." I suppose that means they are not compulsory
today.
Richard.
|
1454.15 | There's a clue in the possible answers! | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Tue May 28 1991 14:48 | 6 |
| Re: .14 If you re-read question 6 in .0, you'll see that some sort of
existing compulsion is implied. Thus they are compulsory for some
category today. That category is under-14's. From 1st July it is
enhanced to include all people - and not a moment too soon IMHO.
Jeff.
|
1454.16 | a subject close to my heart.... | ODDONE::BELL_A1 | | Tue May 28 1991 15:00 | 22 |
|
from a chat with the local police....
the flashing signs on the central resevation are NOT MANDATORY....but
various forces are trying to change that..
Following too close (not stopping fast enough) is the cause of many
minor accidents.. but suprisingly enough drivers falling asleep at the
wheel causes more near fatal/fatal accidents than the other 2.
licenced drivers with learners... as far as I can understand the only
ruling to this is the 'qualified' driver must have 12 months of
'experience' which means that if they passed the test at the minimum
age (17), the minimum age that they can accompany a learner is 18.
now what are the other questions ??
Alan..
|
1454.17 | Friday actually! | UKCSSE::RDAVIES | I can't tryp for nots | Tue May 28 1991 15:31 | 16 |
| >> <<< Note 1454.9 by MARVIN::RUSLING "Hastings Upper Layers Project Leader" >>>
>> How do you keep up with the changes? When was the last time you
>> bought a highway code? Plus, ignorance is no excuse in the eyes
>> of the law.
After reading this I looked at one in the local news agents. I was just
about to reject it as "no different from the one I've got" (same
picture on the cover et al) when inside the back, in small print about
reprints it said REPRINTED 1991
True 'nuff, it has all the latest legislative bits, seat belts and all.
So come on everyone, buy one, it IS different (pity they don't put 1991
edition on the front!)
Richard
|
1454.18 | | JUNO::WOOD | Pooh didn't use a blindfold | Tue May 28 1991 15:33 | 11 |
|
When my brother got his provisional licence through, it was accompanied by a
peice of paper saying that anyone sitting next to him, had to be over 21 with
a full licence. Judging by the options that you had, it must also have included
a set period for which they must have been driving, but I ignored that as I knew
I was safe from having to accompany him as I was still only 20 (just, he
actually passed 4-5 weeks before my 21st !!!!)
Alan
~~~~~~
|
1454.19 | | CHEST::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Tue May 28 1991 15:44 | 21 |
| Re .14
I believe it is a requirement for an accompanying driver to have
held a license for 3 or more years to 'supervise' a learner.
(as well as being 21 years of age).
Re .14 and earlier
Updates to the law affecting drivers are usually notified
when you receive a road tax (road find license ?) reminder.
That's where I have heard of some of these new laws.
I don't know how far this system goes, but I am sure that there
are changes to the [motoring] law that I am unaware of.
One obvious failing of this system is that most people will
receive only one or two updates per year.
Some people will not even get to see the notes...
J.R.
|
1454.20 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Tue May 28 1991 18:00 | 14 |
| > Updates to the law affecting drivers are usually notified
> when you receive a road tax (road find license ?) reminder.
That's a problem for lease car "owners", then. All we get is a tax
disc through the internal mail.
But the comment about the Highway Code made me think. I can't remember
the last time I looked at a copy. Haven't they now withdrawn the
direction signals a horse and cart driver makes with his whip? :-)
Perhaps it should be a legal requirement to own/carry an up-to-date
copy, and to renew it each year. I shall be getting one asap.
Jeff.
|
1454.21 | | BRUMMY::BELL | Martin Bell, {watch this space} Birmingham UK | Wed May 29 1991 06:59 | 13 |
| I agree that it is worrying that the Highway Code is "revised" without
obvious changes to the cover. I bought one about a year ago, so it sounds
like this is already out-of-date.
Do they incluse "change bars" so that you know what is different?
Anyway, the highway code is only a "guide". Surely changes to laws as
significant as the ones mentioned should be publicised properly, and
not just the 30 second filler at the end of the news. There are umpteen
million drivers in this country, and they can't all be checking in
W.H.Smiths whether updates have been made!!!!
mb
|
1454.22 | P.S. the red flag is out too! | UKCSSE::RDAVIES | I can't tryp for nots | Wed May 29 1991 14:52 | 25 |
| >><<< Note 1454.21 by BRUMMY::BELL "Martin Bell, {watch this space} Birmingham UK" >>>
>> I agree that it is worrying that the Highway Code is "revised" without
>> obvious changes to the cover. I bought one about a year ago, so it sounds
>> like this is already out-of-date.
Likely
>> Do they incluse "change bars" so that you know what is different?
No chance
>> Anyway, the highway code is only a "guide". Surely changes to laws as
>> significant as the ones mentioned should be publicised properly, and
>> not just the 30 second filler at the end of the news. There are umpteen
>> million drivers in this country, and they can't all be checking in
>> W.H.Smiths whether updates have been made!!!!
Want to bet?, This is usually the 'filler' item just before the one
about a cuddly panda!.
Anyway, at least the pictures/drawings have been updated. Out go the
Morris 1100, in comes a metro lookalike.
Richard
|
1454.23 | ex | VOGON::DAWSON | Turn ignition on - Turn brain off! | Thu May 30 1991 12:19 | 50 |
| Thanks one and all for your suggestions and comments. I have
mislaid my copy of Highway Code (which was a good couple of years old)
and have had it on my list of things to do for a while. I really will
go out and get one now - it might answer the last couple of questions!
Cheers,
Colin
Synopsis of answers so far (and it needs a little more work on
questions 2,3 and 7!!) is :
1. A qualified driver may accompany a learner if they meet certain
criteria - what are the criteria?
b) aged 21, full licence 3 years FROM 4 RESPONSES
2. What is the most common cause of motorway accidents?
a) falling asleep at the wheel
OR
b) travelling too close
OR
c) travelling too fast
1 response in favour of each of these three!!!!
3. How many pedestrians are killed or injured on pedestrian crossings
each year?
a) 1500 FROM 1 RESPONSE
4. Speed limits shown by electronic signal on M-ways are advisory or
mandatory?
3 ADVISORY
1 MANDATORY
5. If all rear seat passengers were restrained, the DoT assess that
fatal and serious injuries would be reduced by :
c) 1/2 FROM 2 RESPONSES
6. Where fitted, it is compulsory for rear belts to be worn by :
c) children under 14 (current rule) FROM 3 RESPONSES
7. M-ways carry 15% of motor vehicle traffic - what percentage of
accidents causing injury occur on them?
a) 2% FROM 1 RESPONSE
|
1454.24 | | DCOPST::BRIANH::NAYLOR | Purring again. | Thu May 30 1991 15:54 | 1 |
| Sure seems like a lot of opinion and not a lot of knowledge :-) :-)
|
1454.25 | | CHEST::RUTTER | Rut The Nut | Thu May 30 1991 16:09 | 9 |
| On the subject of road safety, the freebie local rag delivered at home
included a couple of statistics from a report now available.
In the report, it states that the U.K. has the safest roads in Europe !
Also, that of however many billion pounds are collected in road 'tax',
less than 22% is used towards roadworks. (I forget the figures).
J.R.
|
1454.26 | I agree with -2 : too much hot air!! | VOGON::DAWSON | Turn ignition on - Turn brain off! | Fri May 31 1991 10:10 | 6 |
| Very interesting but this is not helping guys!! C'mon, I
wannanother chance to drive round Thruxton with Damon Hill and chat to
Jonathon over lunch. Gimme a break... I'm definately going to buy a
Highway Code this weekend :-)
Colin
|
1454.27 | Source for info | YUPPY::COLLINSP | | Mon Jun 03 1991 13:48 | 8 |
| May I suggest that you (and several of your friends!!) contact
Autoexpress tel. no: 071 921 5900 as they will, almost certainly, give
you the correct info on the disputed questions.
As they will probably be aware of the competition is the reason for
using more than one person to elicit the answers.
Pete
|
1454.28 | Final answers sheet | VOGON::DAWSON | Turn ignition on - Turn brain off! | Mon Jul 15 1991 09:46 | 99 |
| Well, I finally entered the competition, after many happy hours
trying to learn the definitive answers to some of these questions through
local council Road Safety Officers, magazines and the Highway Code. Not sure
I got them all right but this is what I sent in. I'll let you know if I get
through to the heats (at Thruxton on 23rd July) :
1. A qualified driver may accompany a learner if they meet certain
criteria - what are the criteria?
a) aged 18, full licence 1 year
--> b) aged 21, full licence 3 years
c) aged 25, full licence 3 years
2. What is the most common cause of motorway accidents?
a) falling asleep at the wheel
--> b) travelling too close
c) trevelling too fast
3. How many pedestrians are killed or injured on pedestrian crossings
each year?
a) 1500
--> b) 3000
c) 3500
4. Speed limits shown by electronic signal on M-ways are :
a) advisory
--> b) mandatory
5. What must you do if the red lights above your motorway lane flash?
--> a) Stop
b) Proceed with caution
c) leave at next junction
6. What is recommended as a following distance in normal driving
conditions?
a) One foot for each mph?
b) 3 metres for each mph?
--> c) 1 metre for each mph?
7. The shortest braking distance at 50 mph is quoted as :
a) 50 ft
--> b) 125 ft
c) 90 ft
8. If there are no speed limit signs, the maximum speed under street
lights is :
--> a) 30 mph
b) 40 mph
c) 50 mph
9. Where fitted, it is compulsory for rear belts to be worn by :
--> a) all passengers (as of 1.7.91)
b) only if under 5' tall
c) children under 14
d) on motorways
10. If all rear seat passengers were restrained, the DoT assess that
fatal and serious injuries would be reduced by :
--> a) 1/3
b) 2/3
c) 1/2
11. Anti-lock brakes work only when :
a) braking on snow or ice
b) braking very heavily
--> c) a wheel starts to lock
d) braking on any slippery surface
12. What is the cause of 95% of road accidents?
a) travelling too fast
--> b) human error
c) not stopping at red lights
d) vehicle defects
13. Reaction time of an average driver is equivalent to :
a) one yard (3 ft) for each mph travelled
--> b) one foot for each mph travelled
c) ten feet for each mph travelled
d) one metre for each mph travelled
14. M-ways carry 15% of motor vehicle traffic - what percentage of
accidents causing injury occur on them?
--> a) 2%
b) 5%
c) 12%
d) 18%
|
1454.29 | | HUGS::AND_KISSES | Scott Marshall | Mon Jul 15 1991 10:03 | 7 |
| re .28
Question 4: I thought they were advisory...
Question 11: I would hope that anti-lock brakes worked all the time :-)
Scott
|
1454.30 | Maybe "A"? | RUTILE::BISHOP | | Mon Jul 15 1991 17:29 | 18 |
| > 1. A qualified driver may accompany a learner if they meet certain
> criteria - what are the criteria?
>
> a) aged 18, full licence 1 year
> --> b) aged 21, full licence 3 years
> c) aged 25, full licence 3 years
Surely the answer is A if it has to be any.
When i accompanied a friend for lessons, i was 18 and hadn't even sent
off for a full license - i had passed about 4 months earlier. I still
had the pass certificate, and as my normally luck goes we got stopped...
the policemans answer to me was...
"Anyone with a full license."
So i applied and recieved my license and took my friend out again,
no problems...
|
1454.31 | | VOGON::ATWAL | | Mon Jul 15 1991 17:30 | 6 |
| re.30
the law recently changed to 'over 21 with 3yrs full licence'
...art
|
1454.32 | | JUNO::WOOD | Pooh didn't use a blindfold | Mon Jul 15 1991 18:21 | 9 |
|
As I pointed out a few back, my brothers provisional came through with a small
easily missed peice of paper saying that it was 21yrs old, so as you can imagine
I was well cheesed off as I was still 20 at the time. *8+>
Alan
~~~~~~
|
1454.33 | Oh! | RUTILE::BISHOP | | Tue Jul 16 1991 11:34 | 9 |
| Thanks for correcting me...
I don't want to get arrested if i take anyone out for a little lesson.
And who says this conference isn't useful? ;-)
Cheers,
Lewis.
|