T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1164.1 | | KURMA::IJOHNSTON | Zippy dee doo da!! | Wed Jul 25 1990 03:10 | 7 |
| It`s not only new cars that have this on it. A lot of second hand
dealers are putting them on too. I know if I bought a second hand or
new car and it had one of those on it I`d be telling them where they
could put their plaque. I`d at least want them to remove the plaque and
attend to any damage on a second hand car.
Ian.
|
1164.2 | | JGO::SHERLOCK | | Wed Jul 25 1990 08:41 | 5 |
| No you are not being fussy, I also find it irritating. Over here
in Holland dealers also have the annoying habit of sticking the "NL"
badge on the paintwork instead of on the rear window.
Tim
|
1164.3 | | YUPPY::FOX | Access is easier when you use plastic | Wed Jul 25 1990 10:18 | 12 |
| I believe the reason they are doing it is because dealers will not
be able to "advertise" on number plates in the near future. Therefore,
if Joe Public decides to take the plastic sticker out of his rear
window, the dealer will no longer be getting free advertising.
I agree with the base note. Not only do cars (generally speaking)
have enough badges on the back, but these additional badges are
in my opinion rather tacky.
It's interesting to note that the "perceived quality" franchises
like BMW and Mercedes have not resorted to this practice.
|
1164.4 | | VOGON::ATWAL | Dreams, they complicate my life | Wed Jul 25 1990 10:20 | 9 |
| >> It's interesting to note that the "perceived quality" franchises
>> like BMW and Mercedes have not resorted to this practice.
not true (unfortunately) i've seen loads of these tacky badges on new mercs &
new bmw's . The Mercedes dealers in Coventry & Birmingham put them onto both
new & used cars.
...art
|
1164.5 | | YUPPY::FOX | Access is easier when you use plastic | Wed Jul 25 1990 10:22 | 11 |
| Re .2
Guernsey in the Channel Islands has a good solution for displaying
the nationality plate. All number plates include on the right hand
side the GBG symbol, legally-correct size and shape, for example:
12345 (GBG)
If this were adopted across Europe, you would escape the situation
that .2 describes.
|
1164.6 | .5 thats a good one. SIZE may be a problem.. | VANDAL::BOSLEY | | Wed Jul 25 1990 10:48 | 1 |
|
|
1164.7 | But there again... | EFGV04::MUDAN_J | The Flagon With The Dragon... | Wed Jul 25 1990 11:04 | 8 |
|
I always thought that the 'Dealer's Stickers', on the rear window,
were there to help you with reversing ;-)
Merc and BMW are available now without the gleaming, crome, 'Series
Denoter'. That should leave enough room for the poxy plastic garage
sticker ;-)
|
1164.8 | | YUPPY::FOX | Access is easier when you use plastic | Wed Jul 25 1990 12:20 | 16 |
| My 316i has "no model identification" (as BMW call it), mainly because
I don't see the need for all and sundry to see exactly what model
I'm driving, and also because I don't want people to know its ONLY
a 316i and not a 325i (though we all know how to spot the difference
at a hundred yards).
In my opinion there's nothing worse than seeing, for example, the
following on the back of a car:
Cavalier 2.0 L i
I know its a Cavalier
I don't NEED to know its a 2 litre model
I don't WANT or NEED to know its an "L"
Who cares if its got fuel-injection?
|
1164.9 | slightly tongue in cheek.. | KERNEL::HUTCHINGS | Nice Computers Don't Go Down | Wed Jul 25 1990 13:24 | 9 |
|
The Japanese are some of the worst offenders..
eg:
Mitsuhondasakihatsu 3.0i GLXS 4wd turbo landcruiser special
you need a 10ft wide car just to get the badges on..!!
:-) :-) :-)
|
1164.10 | | MARVIN::RUSLING | Hastings Upper Layers | Wed Jul 25 1990 13:24 | 11 |
|
Even worse are the large paint jobs down the sides saying things
like SRi. I guess 'cos the boxes look the same, you've got to add
stuff to differentiate between them so that people can tell your
status in life. Which is, of course, what the letter in the
numberplate is for.
Of course, this only applies to ordinary cars, no one in their
right mind would do this to a Ferrari...
Dave
|
1164.11 | | SHAPES::BUCKLEYC | Bareback on the Shark | Wed Jul 25 1990 13:30 | 6 |
|
When I come up behind a car, I like to know what engine its got so that
I can determine the overtaking distance required. Most infuriating tend
to be the 205 GTi's, with the engine size on the panel on the side.
Chris
|
1164.12 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Wed Jul 25 1990 14:01 | 12 |
| Going back to the basenote, why not quote the dealer for the
advertising space? If he then puts his plaque/sticker/why on the car,
he is, in law, accepting your offer, and you have a contract. All you
need to do is invoice him, and collect the dosh.
If he decides to terminate the contract, it will, of course, be a
condition of your quote that he gives due notice (a month seems
reasonable) and removes the advert, and makes good the paintwork.
Simple, really.
Steve
|
1164.13 | Re .11 | IOSG::MARSHALL | Harry Palmer | Wed Jul 25 1990 14:04 | 4 |
| Surely you pass 205s so quickly there isn't time to look and see how small
their engines are?
Scott ;-)
|
1164.14 | 1500 SLX with go-faster stripe | PEKING::GERRYT | | Wed Jul 25 1990 14:18 | 16 |
| I agree that the Japs tend to be the worst...seems to be a hangover
from their dominance in the m/cycles market.
Of special importance seems to be the need to specify the number
of valves and all the go-faster goodies under the bonnet which make
the cars unserviceable yourself. I bet the garage mechanics' hearts
stop beating when they see some of them coming in for a service/tune.
On the other hand, perhaps it's all a ploy to ensure you take the
car to an "authorised service agent".
How about the MG rubber stamp marks all across the previous series
Metro doors and rear side panel?
Even LADA are getting in on the act!
Timbo
|
1164.15 | mine's a 2.0 DOHC EFi GLS !! | COMICS::HWILLIAMS | | Wed Jul 25 1990 14:47 | 10 |
| My Lease car has no dealer markings whatsoever, no trademark on the
number plate, no sticker in the back window and no stick-on badge on
the bootlid. I've only got a PHH licence holder!!
( To tell you the truth I've forgotten who supplied it!)
As regards manufacturers model markings, we all know that some
individuals treat their cars as extensions of their manhoods, and want
everyone to know how big their .. car is!
:-) Huw.
|
1164.16 | They can take the off....... | COMICS::COOMBER | It works better if you plug it in | Wed Jul 25 1990 15:50 | 14 |
| Re a few back.
Most 'quality' car dealers (ie: Jaguar, Rolls Royce, etc) don't put
all the crap on the boot lid. However I have seen that Village Mercedes
do put a smalll logo on the boot lid. It really gets up my nose all
that crap on the boot lid. If I ever get a car with it on, they can
take it off as quick as they put it on ,and repair any damage caused by
it. I don't mine on the number plate or a small sticker in the rear
window but the boot lid is right out of it. My Bmw has got so many
badges on it anybody elses would be lost.
Garry
|
1164.17 | Aghhhhhhhhh | BAHTAT::HILTON | Two in the box ready to go | Wed Jul 25 1990 17:12 | 17 |
| What's even worse is:
1) The Terry TURBO back window halfords stickers in red that block all
rear vision.
2) Some prat in a 950cc dodgy old motor who has been down the scrap
heap and pulled of all turbo, i and other stickers and whacked them on
the back, side , front etc of his/her 'motor'.
3) Someone with a Ford L, who has also been down the scrappy and got
the RS -Turbo badge and whacked it on his/her car. (Ford just used as
an example)
It makes me so mad...
Mr Angry from Pearly
|
1164.18 | rip ! | VULCAN::BOPS_RICH | his dusty boots are his cadillac | Wed Jul 25 1990 17:56 | 1 |
| I'm afraid most of those badges are off someone else's motor !
|
1164.19 | | COMICS::FISCHER | I've got a match... | Thu Jul 26 1990 09:40 | 6 |
| A car is a car. An object to transport people and goods from one place to
another. Some do it faster, some cheaper, some more comfortably. Who cares what
badges it has on it! You don't see them when you're in the car anyway!
Ian
|
1164.20 | Competitive stuff. | TASTY::JEFFERY | Tears of disbelief spilling out of my eyes | Thu Jul 26 1990 10:22 | 18 |
| RE: 1164.8;
>> I don't want people to know its ONLY
>> a 316i and not a 325i (though we all know how to spot the difference
>> at a hundred yards).
Well only people who are interested in BMW's would know.
With the advent of these 'unmarked' BMW's and Merc's, I detect a little note
of smugness. A bit like BMW are saying that their cars are so special that it
is beneath themselves to play in this childish (2.0 i GLS DOHC Turbo stuff).
I think the only way to declare yourself above this is to say that you don't
care.
Mark.
P.S. Yes, I do look at the side panel for a Peugeot 205 GTi, as I overtake them.
|
1164.21 | Who need's badges anyway????? | COMICS::COOMBER | It works better if you plug it in | Thu Jul 26 1990 11:30 | 6 |
| How many 750i Bmw's get debadged?????? I can't honestly say that I have
seen a many non 316 318 or 320 Bmw's that have been debadged. The low
end 3 series don't need the badges . Everyone knows what it is.
Garry
|
1164.22 | Badges Collectors | LISVAX::BRITO | | Thu Jul 26 1990 11:54 | 15 |
| A couple of years ago there was a new fashion that consisted in
collecting badges. The collectors were the kids of a school that
I happen to know particularly well. Many cars that were parked near the
place were debadged daily. The thing took such proportions that police
had to be envolved. Some kids had some real good collections. I
"contributed" with a MINI 1275 GT badge :-)). I would say that the
most searched badges are the ALFA ones. There are plenty circulating
without badges. The Japanese must have studied this because a lot
of Japanese cars have the bagdes painted on the body. There are
some really long ones like the Toyota "Corolla GTI 1.6 Twincam 16"
(uf!)...
Regards,
RUI
|
1164.23 | Mc Coll badges | WELSWS::LOWED | | Thu Jul 26 1990 12:01 | 6 |
| Anyone seen those 'MC Coll' stickers on cars ? Ugly looking cartoon
character about 4" tall in garish colours - Ultimate in bad taste - I'd
sue them if they stuck that permanently on any car of mine !
Dave.
|
1164.24 | SAP := Standard American Practice
| BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Thu Jul 26 1990 16:08 | 0 |
1164.25 | | JUNO::WOOD | WereFrogs of DECpark unite !!!!!!! | Thu Jul 26 1990 17:31 | 6 |
| I always thought that the best way of doing things with the badges was
to get a turbo version, then stick 1.1 badges on it, and watch the looks
on peoples faces as you leave them for dead !!!!!
Alan
~~~~~~
|
1164.26 | | SUBURB::SCREENER | Robert Screene, UK Finance EUC | Thu Jul 26 1990 19:24 | 8 |
| I wanted to borrow my stepmother's 'Golf' badge for my GTi when I
brought it, but i'm afraid my ego argued with me on that one!
Does anyone notice that the GTi, SRi, XR, GTE sticker actually attracts
cars behind you to the back of your car? What effect to the shiny dealer's
adverts have?
Rob.
|
1164.27 | inside the car? | MARVIN::RUSLING | Hastings Upper Layers | Fri Jul 27 1990 10:38 | 7 |
| Whilst sat in traffic on the J11 roundabout before coming into DECpark, I
noticed a Citroen with a small shiny badge that said "16V". On the driver's
dashboard. Following earlier arguments for this note, does the driver check
the rating of the car in front, glance at the dash to check his/her own and
if his/hers is better, then overtake?
Dave
|
1164.28 | who cares? | COMICS::COOMBER | It works better if you plug it in | Fri Jul 27 1990 10:45 | 4 |
| My BMW motorcycle doesn't have all this i or turbo crap on it, it just
has K100LT. It could have had K100 1.0i LT ABS. It don't go no faster,
dosn't change its appearance . It goes like stink without all that ,
I'm happy that just have model number on it.
|
1164.29 | | YUPPY::FOX | Access is easier when you use plastic | Fri Jul 27 1990 17:23 | 25 |
| Re .20
On BMW drivers (for example) being smug.
Perhaps this could be true for some, but my personal reason for
having no badges, is purely because I really don't see why a car
should be labelled as a particular model. The shape alone denotes
that it is a 3 Series, the person driving behind me has no need
for information that it is a 316i and not a 318i or a 320i for that
matter. As you say, only people who are interested in BMWs would
know the differences between the models in the Series.
For example, think of all those cars that have a little "Automatic"
badge on them. Totally unnecessary in my opinion.
Someone commented earlier that when you come up behind someone with
a view to overtaking them, its good to know what you're dealing
with in front - is it a 1.6 or a 2.0i, for example - I don't believe
this is important at all. If you plan to overtake someone, regardless
of engine size, you should plan your maneouvre carefully and only
implement it if you are "confident" of overtaking successfully and
most importantly, safely.
|
1164.30 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Fri Jul 27 1990 17:37 | 4 |
| Unless, of course, the personal you are overtaking perceives it as a
personal slight, and accelerates to prevent the overtaking manoevre.
Steve
|
1164.31 | It's a 1.x gtei.. last time I tried to.. | SHAPES::BUCKLEYC | Bareback on the Shark | Fri Jul 27 1990 17:52 | 8 |
| re -1
exactly. On many occasions I have had the vehicle in front accelerate,
just because I was starting to overtake. Looking at the badge is
simply a further safety device to ensure that you don't get left
facing a head on collision.
Chris
|
1164.32 | | HAMPS::JORDAN | Chris Jordan, London Technology Group, UK | Mon Jul 30 1990 10:28 | 7 |
| The badge that IS useful on tha back of a car is the one that never
seems to be there....
The ABS badge.
But by the time you can read it, it is normally too late - he can
stop a lot quicker than you can!!
|
1164.33 | ;-) | OVAL::ALFORDJ | Ice a speciality | Mon Jul 30 1990 11:26 | 2 |
|
not on a dry road he can't....
|
1164.34 | | TASTY::JEFFERY | Tears of disbelief spilling out of my eyes | Mon Jul 30 1990 15:10 | 5 |
| RE: .32
Or he brakes a lot later than most people, because of supreme confidence.
Why bother with ABS and Catalyst!
|
1164.35 | | FORTY2::QUICK | Trust me, I know what I'm doing. | Tue Jul 31 1990 13:37 | 6 |
|
Actually, ABS can't stop you faster in any conditions... but
you can steer the car while you're slowing down which you
can't when you've locked normal brakes up...
Jonathan (who has ABS and hates it)
|
1164.36 | Steering clear of a rathole | DOOZER::JENKINS | | Tue Jul 31 1990 13:47 | 11 |
|
.last (not quite true and a rathole)
In the wet a car with ABS will stop faster than a car without, assuming
the cars are braking hard enough to lock the wheels.
However, ABS equipped cars will take longer to stop in both dry
conditions and snow.
|
1164.37 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Tue Jul 31 1990 14:12 | 6 |
| > In the wet a car with ABS will stop faster
Do you mean 'stop sooner'? :-) :-)
Jeff.
|
1164.38 | Works for me...... | COMICS::COOMBER | It works better if you plug it in | Tue Jul 31 1990 14:36 | 13 |
| I've got abs on a motorcycle. I've tested it at Bmw's expense on thier
machine in controlled conditions. You'd have a job to convince me that
it dosn't work better than ordinary brakes. Ask anyone who's rode a
motorcycle a) what would happen if you lock both wheels up on a wet
greasy road at 40 mph and b) what would be the braking distance under
those conditions. I can say without fear, that the answer to a) will
determine the answer of b) and that whatever the answer is it will not
favour the bike without abs. ABS does stop quicker, safer and in a
straight line under total control. I can't imagine that a car works any
different , save for the fact the abs does not work on snow (so I'm
told)
Garry
|
1164.39 | | OVAL::ALFORDJ | Ice a speciality | Tue Jul 31 1990 14:52 | 5 |
|
...a car doesn't fall flat on it's side when you loose traction...
I'd say that ABS would be of more use on a motorcycle than on a car for
just this reason !
|
1164.40 | can't remember who stated this but... | VOGON::ATWAL | Dreams, they complicate my life | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:00 | 5 |
| why do you think that a car with ABS has a greater stopping distance than
a car without ABS ?
...art
|
1164.41 | | COMICS::HWILLIAMS | | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:07 | 14 |
| I was always under the impression that ABS helped 'dry' braking.
This is because maximum braking efficiency is at the point where the
wheel is a hair's breadth away from locking. But your average right
foot isnt sensitive enough to get to this position. So the nearest you
can get to maximum efficiency is to lock all 4 wheels and screech the
tyres. (Dont do this when its wet!)
so electronic ABS can get the wheels/brakes to maximum efficiency 20
times a second.
This is what a police instructor once told me.
Huw.
|
1164.42 | ABS - a rathole | FORTY2::BETTS | | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:12 | 14 |
|
Because the coefficients of sliding and rolling friction are very
similar for rubber on dry tarmac. So, using ABS your average braking
effort will be less and your stopping distance a very small bit
longer. In practice, with a decent ABS system, the difference is
theoretical.
On a wet road, an ABS equipped car will stop sooner in an emergency.
A quote I liked was 'The ABS gets confused when you're going
backwards', from somebody I know who had just spun a 911 Carrera 2.
(on purpose, off the road).
Bill.
|
1164.43 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Tue Jul 31 1990 16:09 | 19 |
| I believe the last two have nearly got it.
Mansell, Senna, Prost or whoever your favourite is, is probably capable
of beating ABS because of their highly developed driving skills in
marginal situations, and can cadence brake effectively, thus acheiving
a very high degree of braking efficiency. Most of the rest of us
mortals only have to do such braking infrequently. I have had cars with
ABS for the last four years, and I can only remember the ABS cutting in
for real four times. Two of them were in situations where steerage and
braking were both required. In none of these instances were stopping
distances a problem.
I believe, FWIW, that despite 23 years of driving (for what THAT is
worth!) my skill level is probably not adequate to beat ABS, because I
simply do not have cause to practise cadence braking to that extent.
I would not wish to be without ABS, for my neck's sake.
Steve
|
1164.44 | | KERNEL::PARRY | 16 bits R SXy | Tue Jul 31 1990 18:13 | 11 |
| > Because the coefficients of sliding and rolling friction are very
> similar for rubber on dry tarmac. So, using ABS your average braking
The explanation does explain the rash statements that "ABS causes
longer stopping distances", I question the validity. What proof
is there ? In my experience, a bicycle will stop sooner if the
the back wheel is not locked. Also car's going round bends will
move more laterally if the wheel is sliding i.e. cars skid off
the road round bends.
Trev
|
1164.45 | AaaaaaaBbbbbbbbSssssss | DOOZER::JENKINS | | Tue Jul 31 1990 18:35 | 9 |
|
re .37
Yes! apologies - "faster" should read "sooner" :-)
This is all covered in another note somewhere. There were certainly
some AA tests done and I think others were quoted...
|
1164.47 | Are we still in the same note ? | TRUCKS::IBOS | | Tue Jul 31 1990 19:28 | 7 |
| ADAC ?
I haven't seen any cars with that on the boot ?
Do they sell LADA's ??
|