T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
99.1 | brake it, don't break it | BARUBA::REARWIN | Reinheitsgebot | Tue Feb 16 1993 11:41 | 13 |
| On my 76 Camaro, I'm considering some upgrades to the brake systems in the next
year. One is to use the larger diameter rotor/spindles from a Caprice and
swap over the tie rod ends and ball joints as needed. Some of the car nut
magazines have covered this. Also, putting in a posi rearend with the disk
brakes looks attractive. With that it may be required to put in a new master
cylinder also. Other magazines have covered that.
To make it optimal, a brake proportioning valve may be needed. Has anyone done
any of this work? Any things to be careful of? What's the optimum method of
setting up that proportioning valve?
put the brakes on,
Matt
|
99.2 | | TINCUP::MFORBES | It's NOT your father's Chevy Vega | Wed Feb 17 1993 07:47 | 15 |
| Matt,
A timely question about the preportioning valve. I need to install a
preportioning valve also. When I put the Chryco 8-3/4" rearend in the
Vega, it dramatically increased the rear brake swept area and now the
rear brakes will lock up too easily.
The fix is to install the Mopar preportioning valve ($60something in the
Jeg's catalog) and dial back the pressure to the rear brakes. A friend
just added one to his Challenger and the installation is no big deal. It
just splices into the rear brake line. Just cut the line, install 2
fittings, double flare the tubes, and bolt it in. I plan on doing mine
in the next month.
Mark
|
99.3 | | RANGER::BONAZZOLI | | Wed Feb 17 1993 11:01 | 5 |
| My brother used the Mopar valve on his Buick and it worked
fine. This was needed after he converted his GM A-body drums
to late 70's Trans-Am disks.
Rich
|
99.4 | ex | CRISTA::ROCHE | | Wed Feb 17 1993 15:57 | 11 |
| Rich,
Do you have an details of the conversion. I know that the spindle
height of the F-body is much greater than the A-body's, requiring
excessive shimming of the upper A-arm to obtain a proper alignment.
Btw: In this months Hot-rod there is a brief statement about putting
Camaro 1LE brakes using late model Caprice spindles and aftermarket
A-arms on a '65 Chevelle.. Now there's some stopping power.
Chris
|
99.5 | Use an adjustable proportioning valve | LEDS::STEVENS | Barney? | Wed Feb 17 1993 20:53 | 21 |
| I've been doing some research on putting disc's up front on the '55.
It looks like I can use rotors and calipers from '69-'72 A-bodies or
'69-'74 Novas. This will supposedly work with the stock spindles.
Also, converting over to dual res master cylinder. In everything
I've read it's been suggested that an adjustable proportioning valve
be used to help tune the system. The only big-buck part is the
caliper mounting brackets which will run me about $175 through
Danchuck.
This may not be the correct place for this but while I'm in doing the
front brakes and suspension I'm also going to swap out the original
'55 heavy duty springs to lower the car about 2� inches (as oppossed
to raising it 3" for the gassser look as it is now...). I understand
that '67-68 Camaro/Firechicken springs will give me the 2�" I'm
looking for. I've got a decent pair of '69 Camaro springs from a
(I beleive) 307 car. Does anyone know what differences there may be
between these and '67-68' springs?
Thanks in advance for any help,
/jim
|
99.6 | Is it a big or small block? | ESKIMO::MANUELE | | Wed Feb 17 1993 21:53 | 6 |
| Re-1
None. That is the 67, 68 and 69 Camaro's all used the same size/type
spring. The spring rate may be different, as the 307 did not come with
any upgraded handling package, so the springs may be "soft".
John M.
|
99.7 | | CRISTA::ROCHE | | Thu Feb 18 1993 05:52 | 5 |
| John,
Right except for '67's which used monoleafs as well as some '68's.
Chris
|
99.8 | | LEDS::STEVENS | Barney? | Thu Feb 18 1993 10:40 | 6 |
| Thanks, John. I've got a small block in the '55, if that was your
question. It sounds like it's a safe bet to at least give it a try.
The suspension travel will be limited a bit but I can't afford dropped
spindles right now.
/jim
|
99.9 | Disk brake swap | RANGER::BONAZZOLI | | Thu Feb 18 1993 10:59 | 28 |
| RE: .4
Chris, I can give you as much detail of the swap as you want. Right
off I can tell you that it is a tough job. Don't listen to people who
say you can get away with the stock upper A-arms. The stock arms will
physically work, but your front end will not come close to alignment.
The car in question was a '72 Buick Skylark that had the stock drums
and power brakes. 1978 TA backing plates, rotors, and calipers were
used to make the swap as well as tie rod ends and ball joints.
(I remember something about 1979 TA parts not working correctly, maybe
due to a metric tie rod end??). Since everything was apart, new Skylark
front springs were installed. To cure the shim problem on the upper
A-arms, a pair of properly sized, tubular, upper A-arms was used.
A Mopar Direct-Connection prop. valve was used adjust the line pressure
front to rear.
The total job took a LONG time, mostly due to learning about the swap
along the way.
The before and after front end height is nearly the same, but cornering
is improved and braking is excellent.
I have probably forgotten half the details, but if you have any other
questions let me know and I will get the answers from my brother.
BTW. If you want to see how the swap looks when finished, I can
show you as my brother still has the car.
Rich
|
99.10 | PROPORTIONING VALVE ROUTING? | CXCAD::SOMERS | | Fri Feb 19 1993 07:14 | 6 |
| Rich, when the adjustable proportioning valve was added to the rear
brake line, was the line still attached to the stock proportioning
valve? Or do you have to create a new line out of the master cylinder
to bypass the stock valve?
Thanks, Eric.
|
99.11 | | RANGER::BONAZZOLI | | Mon Feb 22 1993 10:55 | 4 |
| The valve was put in-line between the master cylinder and the stock
proportioning valve. The stock valve was still used.
Rich
|
99.12 | T-Bird Brakes | GUCCI::LCOLLINS | LARRY_C | Fri Oct 29 1993 10:40 | 7 |
| I own a 1989 Thunderbird Supercoupe that I love. It has one problem
IMHO and that is the brakes. They seem to be sensitive to warpage when
stopping/slowing from high speed (100+). I wonder if getting the rotors
drilled and changing to another type of pad would be of help. Anybody
go any ideas?
Larry
|
99.13 | Get a free set of new ones or go for larger rotors | CADSYS::SHEPARD | Overwhelmed by trivialities | Mon Nov 01 1993 09:21 | 21 |
|
I've had the same problem with my '90 SuperCoupe. There is a
recall out on the front brakes that I had done several months ago.
If you haven't had the car in to the dealer in a while, I might be
worth a call to check the latest service bulletins. This freebie
netted me a new pair of front rotors (Already had warped two sets).
I doubt getting the rotors drilled would help. They are already
vented, so I would expect the heat dissapation to actually get worse
if you drilled them. The major benefit of drilling them is to
remove foreign material from between the rotor and the pad during
braking, not provide extra cooling.
If I warp the front rotors again, I'll be replacing them with a
beefier unit. I don't know where I'd get them. Probably either
Ford Motorsports, or maybe one of the non Ford aftermarket places
like JFZ. I might also consider routing a dryer duct from under
the front spoiler to the wheel wells to help cool the brakes.
Good luck,
--Dave
|
99.14 | cheaper solution to new A-arms. | COMET::RENVILLE | | Sat Dec 18 1993 00:53 | 10 |
| re .4 and .9
Instead of using tubular A-arms one could use the "Problem solver
camber kit". This is offered at Western Auto. If you do not have a
Western Auto around write me a note and I will get you the part number.
The problem solver is the rod that goes between the upper A-arm
bushings(forgot the name of the dang thing since its been a while since
I last did an alingment). It has an offset to accomodate the new
camber/caster angle that aging, saging frames often experience. It will
work fine to give about 1.5 degrees of camber(should be enough). They
cost much less than new A-arms. They cost about 20.00 dollars each.
|
99.15 | 55 Ford PU Brake problem | CXCAD::FRASER | | Mon May 23 1994 08:15 | 13 |
| Hi,
I don't know if I typed in anywhere about this truck, but anyway what we are
dealing with here is a 55 ford pick up, 302, C4. The brakes are now giving me
problems. Stock front drums. The master cylinder is relocated from under the
floor to a more conventional location on the firewall. We used a more modern
master (new) from a 71 maverick, with a proportioning valve (used) out of a
drum braked LTD. Every thing worked perfectly, for a while. Now what's happening
is the front brakes lock and won't release. The pedel pumps up very hard and
won't back off. If you crack the bleeders fluid comes out under pressure.
Any clues what would cause this ???
Thanks,,,
Brian,,,
|
99.16 | see carbuffs | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Mon May 23 1994 11:08 | 10 |
|
See reply in CARBUFFS
You've blocked off the bleed hole.
Additionally;
the mc probably isn't adequate
the "proportioning" valve isn't needed except to light the dash
indicator and is probably screwing up the front-rear balance
|