T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
222.1 | X-flow or not to X-flow. | GIDDAY::WYLLIE | | Tue Aug 01 1989 02:52 | 10 |
222.2 | Don't think so | CSSE::WAITE | | Tue Aug 01 1989 13:53 | 4 |
222.3 | Worlds sorriest excuse for an automobile? | ANT::HHARDMAN | Temporary Tax? Ain't no such thing! | Tue Aug 01 1989 14:28 | 18 |
222.4 | Not hot but long lived | CSSE::WAITE | | Tue Aug 01 1989 15:02 | 9 |
222.5 | Six in a row....well, sorta made it go | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Alive and Well in Wastefield | Tue Aug 01 1989 16:04 | 17 |
222.6 | x-flow?? | COMET::LEWISJ | jim | Tue Aug 01 1989 17:12 | 7 |
222.7 | Opposite sides. | GIDDAY::WYLLIE | | Tue Aug 01 1989 20:58 | 25 |
222.8 | heavy!! | GIDDAY::WYLLIE | | Tue Aug 01 1989 21:01 | 4 |
222.9 | You listening Mr. Mad? | CSSE::WAITE | | Wed Aug 02 1989 11:35 | 2 |
222.10 | Damn, you dragging up some good memories | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Alive and Well in Wastefield | Wed Aug 02 1989 13:02 | 9 |
222.11 | They're around if you look | CSSE::WAITE | | Wed Aug 02 1989 14:20 | 4 |
222.12 | Boss 300?? | COMET::LEWISJ | jim | Wed Aug 02 1989 18:00 | 13 |
222.13 | Essex V6. | CURRNT::SAXBY | Set mode/headless chicken | Thu Aug 03 1989 05:14 | 10 |
222.14 | | CSSE::WAITE | | Thu Aug 03 1989 13:43 | 12 |
222.15 | Zephyr box | CURRNT::SAXBY | Set mode/headless chicken | Fri Aug 04 1989 05:29 | 6 |
222.16 | Yes, I have one ... | CSC32::J_LAWSON | Who is John Galt? | Fri Aug 04 1989 13:17 | 13 |
222.17 | I never saw one of those..... | WFOV12::KOEHLER | Alive and Well in Wastefield | Fri Aug 04 1989 13:31 | 11 |
222.18 | Ouch! | CSC32::J_LAWSON | Who is John Galt? | Fri Aug 04 1989 14:19 | 6 |
222.19 | | LOOKUP::SOTTILE | Orient Express | Wed Feb 21 1990 14:52 | 7 |
222.20 | Its in the front. | WFOV11::FOSTER_C | | Sat Apr 21 1990 00:58 | 6 |
222.21 | 2.9 liter running rough. Any ideas? | SALEM::NORCROSS_W | | Mon Nov 19 1990 11:00 | 10 |
222.22 | request for tune up info. 86 ford van | HANNAH::MODICA | Journeyman Noter | Wed Feb 20 1991 09:19 | 9 |
222.23 | | ICS::SOTTILE | Just Go Away... | Wed Feb 20 1991 10:18 | 2 |
222.24 | 2.9L cracked head. | CSC32::HULL | | Tue Dec 31 1991 16:22 | 6 |
222.25 | 300CID points or no points. That is the question | LEDS::BIANCHI | | Thu Jul 16 1992 10:13 | 8 |
222.26 | Yes but... | MVDS02::SHAW | Persecuted green hat owner | Thu Jul 16 1992 12:53 | 7 |
222.27 | but yeah, fixing it might mess it up | LEDS::COHEN | What do I drive? a Taylor-Made! | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:41 | 5 |
222.28 | Only in Dec.... | MVDS02::SHAW | There's nowt strange as folk | Tue Jul 21 1992 11:59 | 6 |
222.29 | We'll see | LEDS::COHEN | What do I drive? a Taylor-Made! | Tue Jul 21 1992 18:31 | 7 |
222.30 | No heat on Ford Ranger with V6. | VOLAPM::HAIGH | | Fri Dec 16 1994 13:04 | 17 |
222.31 | Engine Check light/Taurus 3.8 | SMURF::PSH | Per Hamnqvist, UNIX/ATM | Thu Mar 06 1997 11:55 | 26 |
| I have a 93 Taurus Wagon with a 3.8L V6. It has 67K miles on it and
is well maintained. Recently we have started to experience minor engine
problems. Here are the symptoms:
(a) The Engine Check light comes on under load and then goes
off ~10 seconds after load goes down. For example, if you
accelerate hard or the family and gear is loaded and you
hit a slight slope on the expressway.
(b) When the engine is warm and you come to a stop, say after
taking an expressway exit and ending at a red light, the
idle can be high (1500rpm in D and 2000rpm in P) and in
some cases the car engine just shuts itself off. If you
manually shut off the car when at high idle and immediately
start again, the idle can drop down to 1000rpm all by itself.
I have not noticed anything unusual with the fuel consumption. Overall,
it behaves well. The plugs are recent, so is filter and distributor cap.
I almost get the impression that some sensor is not functioning. Perhaps
something related to the emissions system has become mal adjusted.
I would really like to fix it myself. Any ideas what could be wrong?
Thanks for your help,
>Per
|
222.32 | | ZEKE::BURTON | Jim Burton, DTN 381-6470 | Thu Mar 06 1997 12:32 | 5 |
| First you have to dump the trouble code(s) from the ECU, then fix the problem,
then reboot the ECU. You must have a shop manual to do it. There is no
other way.
Jim
|
222.33 | Taurus check engine light | DAGWUD::HOPTA | | Thu Mar 06 1997 12:56 | 17 |
| Re: .31
I have a '93 Taurus with the 3.8L.
I had the identical "check engine" light symptoms and I took it into Ford a couple
of times to try and find the problem. They told me that my system had no memory
and it could not find out what the problem was (or what sensor had triggered) if
the light had gone back out. They said they could only trouble shoot it effectively
if the light remained lit. Mine never did, so they never found a problem. I've
driven the car for 70000 more miles since the first onset of the problem (50000
was the initial problem -- I now have over 120000) and I'm still ignoring the light.
It's not very satisfying, but much cheaper than paying Ford to ignore the problem
for me.
Dan
|
222.34 | Light does not stick | SMURF::PSH | Per Hamnqvist, UNIX/ATM | Thu Mar 06 1997 18:32 | 18 |
| in re .33:
Actually, we saw inclings of this problem a long time ago and asked the dealer
to take a look. And just like in your case, there was no information available
in the car when it got to the dealer for them to determine any cause. The light
never sticks, just comes on and then goes off. The duration depends on how long
you are ''loading'' the car.
Does anyone know how many sensors are part of this cars "engine" assembly?
Specifically, which sensors could contribute to the light, at all. Given
that the problem appear to be exhaust temperature related or mixture related,
there cannot be many of them, can there?
What about the catalytic converter? Are there any sensors on that plumbing?
At 67K we ought to have expired the cat warranty too, so could the problem
not also be the need to replace the exhaust system? Have you replaced yours?
>Per
|
222.35 | | CSC32::J_KALINOWSKI | Forget NAM?....NEVER! | Thu Mar 06 1997 19:05 | 10 |
|
>per You have all the symptoms of a partially plugged catalytic
converter (no solid codes), but the only way to know is with a pressure
test. The universal Ford spec is 1.5-1.75 P.S.I. if its above that the
cat is bad. When I test them I drill a hole in the pipe between the
exhaust manifold and the cat and shove in my cone adapter hooked to a
pressure gauge. The reading is taken at idle speed. If its above the
spec, the cat is bad. Then I zap the hole shut with the mig welder.
-john
|
222.36 | Replacing the exhaust | DAGWUD::HOPTA | | Fri Mar 07 1997 11:33 | 16 |
| Per>
I replaced the entire exhaust system on my Taurus early on
(maybe 40000 miles). I can't remember if I had ever seen the
"check engine" light problem before that. The exhaust system is
stainless steel and should "never" need to be replaced, but mine did.
The parts guy couldn't even tell me what one cost when I called him,
because he had never run across the request before. I'm pretty sure
the cat was replaced as part of that job. I don't think it's relevant
to the discussion, though, because all of my problems have occurred
since then.
Also, when I asked about the light problem, the service manager
told me that there were 5 or 6 sensors that could trigger the problem,
so he didn't want to simply "point and shoot" to try to trouble shoot
it.
FWIW,
Dan
|
222.37 | | ZEKE::BURTON | Jim Burton, DTN 381-6470 | Fri Mar 07 1997 19:35 | 3 |
| It could also be a bad oxygen sensor.
Jim
|
222.38 | Oxygen sensor | VMSNET::M_MACIOLEK | Four54 Camaro/Only way to fly | Mon Mar 10 1997 10:03 | 15 |
| It's the oxygen sensor. This thing is constantly checking for
rich/lean mixture, apparently it isn't cycling or doing what's known
as cross-counts often enough. When you get off the freeway the sensor
is slow to richen the mixture, so the engine stalls. When you refire
the engine it "remembers" how to run properly.
When you stomp on the engine and go uphill, the engine is slow to
figure out it needs to be richened, so the idiot light comes on.
The o2 sensor is cheap and easy to replace. under $20. Beat's going
to the garage and getting jacked around, plus it'll probably fix the
problem.
Regards,
MadMike
|
222.39 | I have a plan | SMURF::PSH | Per Hamnqvist, UNIX/ATM | Mon Mar 10 1997 12:05 | 6 |
| Thank you all for your help. I am going to try to replace the oxygen
sensor first and move on from there. I will post any progress here.
Cheers,
>Per
|
222.40 | | VMSNET::M_MACIOLEK | Four54 Camaro/Only way to fly | Mon Mar 10 1997 13:34 | 19 |
| I assume the engine is fuel injected, if so, everything is
electronically controlled. The sensors are many, but since the
problem is sporatic and reproducable under certain conditions, it
points at the O2 sensor. This is the heart of the fuel delivery system.
on a carbureted car, it'll use a o2 sensor and a Mixture control
solenoid. On FI, the O2 sensor continuously monitors exhaust
temperature and the ECM continuously adjusts fuel delivery to the
injector(s) based on engine demand.
There are other sensors and switches to be aware of, but none that
i'd finger right off the bat, since the idiot code is not stored, and
the problem happens predicably. There are temperature switches,
Manifold Pressure switches and throttle position sensors, but I would
think if any of these were busted, your car would run like crap 100%
of the time. There is also a solenoid in the transmission which
controls clutch lockup. These are a few of the sensors you may have.
MadMike
|
222.41 | location ?? | QUAKKS::DWORSACK | | Thu Mar 13 1997 12:36 | 11 |
| i "think" i saw were this ox sensor is located. on a taurus, if you
remove the shroud around the fan, and look down to the header comming
off the block, you should see a sensor on the pipe with wires comming
out of it. probably should hit it with liquid wrench and let it sit
overnight if it does not come loose first thing.
BTW. if this is NOT the sensor i think it is then someone let me know,
since i'm considering replacing my ox sensor for the same types of
problems...
jim
|
222.42 | | VMSNET::M_MACIOLEK | Four54 Camaro/Only way to fly | Thu Mar 13 1997 23:19 | 13 |
| Yes, the oxygen sensor is located in the exhaust pipe, or towards the
bottom of the exhaust manifold or header. It has (usually) one wire
coming out of it that runs to the ECM. Hit it with some liquid
wrench, and another tip to remove it is to allow the engine to be
WARM. Not hot, but warm. This will make it easier to remove than
if it's cold. Another thing you may have a problem with (like I did)
is getting leverage on the sensor. I couldn't get a wrench in there
and be able to turn it without removing the fan. This was on a
cavalier. Hopefully you'll be able to get some leverage on it.
Disconnect the wire from the ECM harness and slide a box end wrench
onto the thing and have at it.
MadMike
|
222.43 | timing belt change? | USCTR1::RIDGE | Steve Ridge @297-6529 | Mon Mar 17 1997 12:55 | 2 |
| 89 Ford Tempo 6cyl
What's the recommended milage for a timing belt change?
|
222.44 | | BUSY::SLAB | A swift kick in the butt - $1 | Mon Mar 17 1997 13:03 | 3 |
|
238.171 doesn't seem to list a belt for the V6.
|
222.45 | | USCTR1::RIDGE | Steve Ridge @297-6529 | Mon Mar 24 1997 00:22 | 1 |
| I'm asleep. Wrong note. The Tempo is a 4 cyl.
|
222.46 | | BUSY::SLAB | A Momentary Lapse of Reason | Mon Mar 24 1997 00:26 | 6 |
|
No recommended change interval.
However, it'll still strand you if it breaks, so this doesn't mean
that it would hurt to have it checked out.
|
222.47 | Oxygen sensors -- an update | SMURF::PSH | Per Hamnqvist, UNIX/ATM | Fri May 09 1997 12:07 | 21 |
| After shopping around, I ended up buying two (Bosch) oxygen sensors from VIP
auto in Merrimack. They were on sale and charged $39.99 a piece. I also bought
a special socket (1/2 wrench mount) to remove it -- the special socket works
with any oxygen sensor and has a slit along one side allowing the wires to come
out while you turn.
Both sensors are best accessed from under the car. The front one was a breeze.
It took me like 2-3 minutes to replace. The rear one took over an hour, because
it is located in such a bad spot. I had to use a universal with the socket. The
worst was that the wires kept getting wrapped around the socket and then jamming
against the engine, making it really tricky to untangle. I ended up snapping one
of the four wires as a result of this, very near the sensor and by that time I
almost had it screwed in. So I had to take it all back out again and fix the
wire and do it again. I also managed to damage the threads on that rear one and
had to take things out again and fix that. A real bear, to say the least.
But the results are good! The car no longer stalls.
Thanks for your help,
>Per
|
222.48 | ECM recalibration | SMURF::PSH | Per Hamnqvist, UNIX/ATM | Fri May 09 1997 12:10 | 5 |
| Oh, one more thing. I was advised by VIP to disconnect the battery after having
replaced these sensors. The reason was to make the ECM recalibrate itself with
the new sensors.
>Per
|