T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1612.1 | My Sediments Exactly | EMDS::MANGAN | | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:23 | 3 |
| You took the words right out of my mouth Jack. Thanks for expressing
some of what "exactly" needs to be said in these tough times. Tobin
Corp. is really sleazy AND! dis-honest.
|
1612.2 | | EMDS::MANGAN | | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:25 | 2 |
| Opps, sorry "AL". where did I get the name Jack? hmmm.
|
1612.3 | Interpretive Footnote | SWAM2::MCCARTHY_LA | I wish to remain anonymous | Fri Sep 27 1991 14:06 | 8 |
| For that tiny fraction of the Corporation not located in E. Mass. and
S. New Hampshire (U.S.A.), this string of notes is discussing the bad
food at the GMA regional company picnic.
Obviously, if you have complaints about the food or any other aspect of
your own regional company picnic, you should start a brand new topic,
one per picnic, one per year. Nobody from GMA will mind plowing through
them all :-)
|
1612.4 | You get regional company picnics?!?!? | ATLANA::SHERMAN | Debt Free | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:16 | 0 |
1612.5 | Yes. For $20.00 per person. | SWAM2::MCCARTHY_LA | I wish to remain anonymous | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:30 | 1 |
|
|
1612.6 | Change in set-up (Non-JIT) | QETOO::SCARDIGNO | Do it RIGHT the 1ST time | Fri Sep 27 1991 16:51 | 7 |
|
Yeah, they changed the set-up this year, where the food is far
away from where it's cooked. I guess they never heard of JIT.
Steve
PS- But the bees seemed to like it!
|
1612.7 | What a waste. | GRANPA::TTAYLOR | fortress around my heart | Fri Sep 27 1991 17:33 | 6 |
| I simply cannot believe that they give you-all turkeys and canobie lake
outings when the Field gets absolutely nothing and with the state of
the company, it is a complete waste of money ...
When I worked out of the Boston office I went to canobie and it wasn't
even worth it.
|
1612.8 | What a surprise | CIMNET::MCCALLION | | Fri Sep 27 1991 18:01 | 15 |
| Tobin is Tobin, we (those of us that have been going for yrs and yrs )
know what we're going to get.. well, NOT THIS YEAR...
This year - I thought it was just me.. I've been with DEC for over
18 yrs, and this is the first time I thought someone else must have
done the food... it was awful.... the table arrangement left much to be
desired IMHO also.
I'm surprised we're still having Canobie Lake as a benefit with the way
the state of the company is. If it's not here next year, I will
miss it.
Marie
|
1612.9 | The bennies that keep on comin' | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Fri Sep 27 1991 18:27 | 3 |
| Yeah, we really are spoiled here in the Northeast where the bennies
just keep on comin'! Canobie Lake, turkeys, discount movie tickets...
What's next? Sky's the limit.
|
1612.10 | A New Note Needed? | FDCV08::CONLEY | Chuck Conley, ACO | Fri Sep 27 1991 18:32 | 7 |
|
Maybe someone should start a note about Tobin Vending service.
It used to be that we went to the Tobin (Digital) cafeteria to
save money. Now, I think people go to McDonalds to save money.
:-)
|
1612.11 | | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Presto! Wrong hat. | Fri Sep 27 1991 22:24 | 9 |
|
Is it possible that Digital has a contract with Canobie Lake for so
many years, and that it can't be broken? Or that it's one of those
things that makes sense tax-wise? If not, I think it's a waste too,
even though I like such niceties in principle.
I didn't go, but I've heard about how bad the food and hornets were.
CQ
|
1612.12 | | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG2-2/BB9 226-7570 | Fri Sep 27 1991 22:57 | 4 |
| How far away is the food serving area from the cooking area now? Did anyone
get an upset stomach from eating the Tobin's food there?
I agree that the outing doesn't make sense in the current state of the com-
pany.
|
1612.13 | | USWAV1::GRILLOJ | John Grillo @ Decus | Mon Sep 30 1991 11:11 | 3 |
| Two members of my family had an upset stomach and had to stop by the
road to get rid of it. But we blamed it on one of the crazy rides that
they went on. So why were there so many bees this year?
|
1612.14 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Mon Sep 30 1991 11:17 | 9 |
| The bees (yellowjackets, actually) were a product of nature and not
under Tobin's control. I wish I could say the same for the food. The
only things that weren't cold were the beans and the coffee. This is
the first year that I've gone that I bought food from the Canobie park
concessions. I think if this picinic were to be continued, they should
consider giving people coupons to spend on the food concessions. It
would very likely be cheaper, given the waste of all the unpalatable
food I saw thrown in the barrels.
|
1612.15 | Terror at Tobinville? | TOOK::DMCLURE | Did Da Vinci move into management? | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:00 | 34 |
| We went to Canobie Lake Park yesterday fully expecting to die
of food poisoning and/or be attacked by killer hornets. When we got
there and finally worked up the courage to go eat lunch, we were
surprized to have one of the more pleasant eating experiences we
have had there in a while.
The hornets are bad everywhere this year (due in large part to
Hurricane Bob), but they seemed to congregate around the soda fountains
and didn't seem too interested in either the food tents or the people.
As for the Tobin cuisine, I had no complaints with anything other
than the corn (which was overcooked and cold). Other than that, I was
quite fulfilled. I was even treated to a double-burger by an elderly
Tobin employee who must have thought I looked hungry (much to the
chagrin of a pregnant friend of mine who always seems to be given
much smaller portions due to her petite size even though she is
currently ravenous)!
On a related note, we had quite a lively discussion at our
lunch table, where we discussed many of the things which get discussed
in this notesfile (various memos, VPs leaving, the ongoing RIFs (oops,
I mean "TSFO"s), etc., and were cautious to look around whenever
mentioning any juicy rumors (to make sure none of the subjects of
our conversation were within hearing distance). After we got up
and got ready to return to the rides, I suddenly realized that we
had been sitting directly behind Bob Glorioso!
-davo
p.s. Ironically, Bob Glorioso didn't even come up in the conversation,
and if he had, it would probably have been in glowing terms
as he is one of the few VP's who ever showed enough interest
in the work I was doing to stop and talk to me about it (he'll
be missed).
|
1612.16 | Thank you | ENABLE::glantz | Mike @TAY 227-4299 TP Eng Littleton | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:13 | 10 |
| We went yesterday, and are still grateful Digital does this, and proud
to be an employee of a company where other employees still care enough
to do this.
Before I was married and a parent, I felt that there should be an
alternative for single folks without kids. I still do. But now that I'm
in a position to appreciate it more, I'm happy to be able to say thanks
to the folks who work so hard to make it happen, Tobin people included.
See you all again next year, Mitsubishi willing :-).
|
1612.17 | Great weather for it Saturday ... | SSPENG::FYFE | Never tell a dragon your real name! | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:22 | 17 |
|
I would think the cost for renting Canobie for a day is cheap
considering the time of year and the number of people that attend.
Tobins however should be put to pasture. Unless you like stale bread
rolls, uncooked hotdogs, overcooked corn, or rock hard burgers
you couldn't help but be disappointed in the food.
The ice cream was good and the beans were edible. Couldn't get
close enough to the soda fountains for a full cup thanks to the bees
(although there were fewer this year than last).
All in all we had fun. Next year I'll pack a lunch.
At least the bees weren't as aggressive as last year.
Doug.
|
1612.18 | thanks... | NETCUR::REID | Calling Elvis... | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:30 | 6 |
|
Went to Canobie yesterday. Weather was great, food okay, bees
atrocious. Kids had fun and that's the most important thing...
Marc
|
1612.19 | OFFICIAL word on Employee Appreciation items | QETOO::SCARDIGNO | Do it RIGHT the 1ST time | Mon Sep 30 1991 13:06 | 22 |
|
{EXTRACTED FROM VTX DELTA, 24-JUL-1991}
Employee Appreciation Events
During economic times like the one we are currently in, Digital continues to
examine many avenues in our effort to be more profitable. Many of you have
written to Delta over time to express concern for expenditures in the Employee
Appreciation area. Some think we need to do more and some think we need to do
less! We have again examined our position on special appreciation events like
Canobie Lake and the distribution of Turkeys. These events take a considerable
time to prepare and decisions must be made well in advance of any such event.
Our Executive Committee strongly supports our continued efforts to recognize
and appreciate our employees efforts during these stressful times. They
continue to support these two events taking place. Our need to say thank you
to each employee is even more evident today, than it has ever been in our past.
Appreciation events such as these allow us to take a moment and reflect on
each persons contributions to Digital. Therefore, we will hold our Canobie
Lake Park event and we will distribute turkeys.
|
1612.20 | | SASE::FAVORS::BADGER | One Happy camper ;-) | Mon Sep 30 1991 13:25 | 10 |
| We seem to go over the same discussion on the food each year.
Tobins donates the food and labor in return for us using them during
the year. Its the same stuff they feed us during the year, same
quality. So if your compl;aining [and I'm not saying your wrong], you
probably aren't one of their customers to begin with, so your getting
an 'extra' bonus. you can elect to take it, or eat at one of the
other places in the park as you did eat out at other places then the
DEC cafe during the year.
|
1612.21 | I loved those bees too. | BROKE::TAYLOR | Hollywood needs Mr. Gorbachev | Mon Sep 30 1991 13:37 | 17 |
| My family and I had a nice time on Saturday, 28 Sept. However, my son,
a 7-year-old highly-accurate and quite strong baseball thrower, thought
that he'd give the pitching speed game a try. This is the booth where
you get to throw 3 baseballs at a canvas target of a cather, and radar
displays your throwing speed. If you guess the speed of your third
pitch, you win some useless prize. Well, my little fireballer went to
work after I payed my $1. He threw at 33 MPH, then at 34 MPH. Next, his
guess was that he'd throw at 34 MPH. He rears back, fires, and hits 34
MPH! Well, he still lost, because the sign says "Correctly guess your
third pitch speed AND pitch a strike and you are a winner." Well, he
missed hitting the catcher, so he DID NOT win after all. WHat a drag,
that kid was bummed. The event operator (must have been a whole 14
years old!) would not budge from his position. My kid lost, period.
The moral of this story? Read between the signs.
Mike Taylor
|
1612.23 | Tobin's | LJOHUB::AKER | | Mon Sep 30 1991 14:03 | 16 |
| I started this note not to put down the outing i think it's great for
the family to spend time with other digital family we work with.
My problem was with the food....as i read the other notes people have
sent in i see not every one was as disappointed as myself but the
majority were and thats what this is all about if the majority of
people that went feel that the food was sub par we should do something
about it ..if i would have been paying for this out of my pocket i
know i would have asked for a REFUND... Someone wrote and stated that
the food and labor was donated by Tobin..NOT A CHANCE OK...beleave me
Digital pay very well for what we DON'T EAT....There must be someone
out there who knows who to contact..
LET THIS BE THE LAST TIME WE LET TOBIN WIN......
Al
|
1612.24 | another Thank you | CIS1::FULTI | | Mon Sep 30 1991 14:33 | 9 |
| Here is the OFFICIAL word of this employee....
I want to say THANKS and I am glad the E.C. has made the decision that they
have. All I can say is, that I will continue to take advantage of the gesture
of a day of fun and enjoyment, cold food or hot served by Tobin's or some
other caterer.
If this makes me selfish, so be it.
|
1612.25 | Most things are what you make them | WLDBIL::KILGORE | Digital had it Then! | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:00 | 21 |
|
Dear Ken,
Went to the outing yestarday. Thanks for a great time. Heard all the
complaining about the food. Yes, the corn could have been a little
crunchier, but as to the cold hamburgers, you and I know how hard it
it is to throw a cook-out at the end of September and keep all the
food warm. Straighten out Tobin's act? We have more interesting windmills
at which to tilt our lances!
Bottom line -- we opened the place up and closed it down, the kids
slept all the way home with full stomachs and smiles on their grubby
faces, and then talked about it until I forced them into bed. Maybe
some cold night this winter, when I'm working late and don't get home
in time to say goodnight, they'll remember a fun outing on a autumn
day, or a warm turkey dinner, and think "All in all, not too shabby..."
Thanks again.
Wild
|
1612.26 | | MIZZOU::SHERMAN | ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:11 | 8 |
| I REALLY APPRECIATE THE CANOBIE LAKE OUTINGS! Cold corn, hard burgers
... it doesn't matter to us! They still taste great to us and they
don't cost us anything! Folks, there are people that volunteer to help
with all that stuff out of the goodness of their hearts and the desire
to do the right thing! Let's not aim our sarcasm at these folks! They
deserve our respect and appreciation!
Steve (looking forward to Canobie Lake!)
|
1612.27 | | MILPND::PIMENTEL | | Mon Sep 30 1991 17:29 | 13 |
| I'm with .24 and .25. Of all the years that we've been going last year
they had decent tasting and hot food it was great. So the food was
terrible... we took the kids for the enjoyment of the park not for
the food. I think they just need to put the arrangement back to how it
was in years past, near the grill so it won't be as cold as it was
this weekend.
And as for the majority of people complaining, I saw a lot more people
at the park on Saturday than the few notes I've seen here so I don't
think the majority are complaining. As some have said, it's Tobin's we
should know what to expect! Bring your own lunch next year or stand
in line at a concession stand but don't let the food be the focuss
of your day of rides and entertainment with the family.
|
1612.28 | | BLUMON::QUODLING | What time is it? QUITTING TIME! | Tue Oct 01 1991 00:49 | 9 |
| SO, if Tobin's are so bad, why not let canteen Corp, who do ZKO (and
possibly other facilities) cafeteria. Much as we complain at ZKO, they
seem to be far better than Tobins, and are closer...
If that doesnt work, can we get the army cooks from Ft Devens. Even
Army chow has got to be an improvement.
q
|
1612.29 | | GRANPA::TDAVIS | | Tue Oct 01 1991 09:01 | 6 |
| As a field employee, we do not receive the benefit of this outing
for our familys, or the turkey. There use to be a fund for a holiday
party that now has also gone away. I guess my message is at least
your family gets something.Given the state of the company, I do
not expect anything, but to hear the tone of this note, I get
angry that we expect so much, other than our pay.
|
1612.30 | Set your expectations correctly | SMEGIT::ARNOLD | Some assembly required | Tue Oct 01 1991 09:22 | 10 |
| I'm with .24 & .25. If Canobie was billed as a *restaurant*, then we'd
(clearly) have something to complain about. But it's billed as an
amusement park, my family & kids look forward to it, and clearly a
"good time was had by all". As an amusement park, I think Canobie
lived up to its expectations, and I for one am thankful that such a
perk is still allowed in these economic times. If I'm shopping for a
new car, I *don't* go to the local appliance store to complain about
the lack of decent car selections there.
Jon
|
1612.31 | screwing up a free lunch! | SOLVIT::BUCZYNSKI | | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:04 | 18 |
| for all those who are annoyed with the *food* and whatever else.
I have the perfect solution.
NEXT YEAR; STAY HOME!
That will leave more space for those of us who appreciate any
thing like this that really isn't mandated but done as an act of
appreciation. I've been around here most of the time since '68.
My kids are grown. My wife and I love the day of rest and all the
memories my kids have of "DEC day at Canobie lake".
To those grumpers; When you are invited out to friends house for a
meal, do you also ask for a doggy bag or ask for change?
In appreciation,
Mike
|
1612.32 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Tue Oct 01 1991 10:17 | 13 |
| > <<< Note 1612.29 by GRANPA::TDAVIS >>>
> Given the state of the company, I do
> not expect anything, but to hear the tone of this note, I get
> angry that we expect so much, other than our pay.
I read this note string as concern that the Company (DEC) isn't getting what
it (presumably) pays for on our behalf, not that the complainers were
whining for their own sake.
If your mother spends good money on a birthday present for you, and it
breaks, is your first thought that your mother is a cheapskate or that
she got ripped off?
- tom]
|
1612.33 | What Picnic
| CSSE::ELDRIDGE | | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:19 | 16 |
| I hate to ask a dumb question but what outing are you guys taking about? I have
been working in Stow for about a year now and didn't even know we were having
one.
I thought company picnics were on hold because of the cost.
I went to a outdoor function that I paided to get in a couple of weekends ago.
I also paid for the cold food. The choice was clear, I didn't buy anymore
food but I still had a good time. O'well thats my 2 cents.
Regards
Bob
|
1612.34 | OGO is Oct. 12 | JUMP4::JOY | Happy at last | Tue Oct 01 1991 13:12 | 7 |
| Bob,
If you're in OGO, then your Canobie Lake outing is Oct. 12, ticket
distribution is probably today and tomorrow. You should have received
your ticket request forms with your check a week or so ago.
Debbie
|
1612.35 | Taking advantage of the system | CALS::HEALEY | DTN 297-2426 (was Karen Luby) | Tue Oct 01 1991 15:34 | 28 |
|
re: all
While I agree that the food was pretty bad, I have gone every
year and enjoyed myself. I appreciate that the company puts
this on for us New Englanders. I am surprised that something
is not done for employees elsewhere in the country. It doesn't
quite seem fair.
What makes me mad... I'm really surprised no-one has mentioned
this... is the employees who take advantage of this outing to
bring people they are not entitled to bring. I was asked by
SEVERAL people in my group for my tickets if I did not go because
they wanted to bring their brother and his family, or their
neighbor or friends. This is not fair at all! Digital pays
for this outing for their EMPLOYEES and families! It costs
money! I expect that at least 5% of the people who went to
Canobie should not have been there. People are losing their
jobs and people in other parts of the country are not able to
go to Canobie Lake and DIGITAL is subsidizing this outing for
non-entitled people! Not to mention the long lines for the
rides.....
I know that it says that tickets and badges must be presented
to enter but I didn't show my badge. I wonder how much money
DEC would save on this outing if they just checked badges!
Karen
|
1612.36 | Definite abuse of the system :-( | ORABX::REESE_K | just an old sweet song.... | Tue Oct 01 1991 19:55 | 29 |
| -1
Karen,
Other parts of the country have had outings in the past....but the
very abuse you mentioned, i.e. people bringing others who are not
members of their immediate family is exactly what cost the Atlanta
area the type of annual outing it has enjoyed in years past.
I did not attend the company picnic last year....it was held at a
water park that I had visited many times. No one asked me for my
ticket (or the guest ticket I was entitled to).....from what I
understand people showed up with 3 times the number of folks who
were actually family members, i.e. friends of their children etc.
Because this water park had based their fee on one estimate of people and
3 times that many showed up, they charged Digital for the extra
head count (as well they should); the extra people would have
been charged an entrance fee if they had driven there on any other day.
Apparently the money that was needed to pay for the abuse last year
all but wiped out any chances for a similar outing this year. A small
event was held right here on the grounds at ALF.
Some folks grumbled this year, but why pick on the organizers. I
still can't figure out why it was so difficult to get a handle on
the situation last year.....personnel profiles should be able to
provide a fairly clear estimate of actual employees and their families.
Karen
|
1612.37 | Re .35, on sharing tickets | FDCV08::CONLEY | Chuck Conley, ACO | Tue Oct 01 1991 20:11 | 33 |
| Re .35
My wife and I did not go to Canobie Lake this year. It was one of
the few times we have missed it in over 20 years. I did not give
our tickets to anyone else, but if it had been possible I probably
would have done so.
How would Digital save money by our not being there? Would they
have saved some cooked hamburgers or corn-on-the-cob for the following
weekend? Maybe they saved a couple of dollars on ice cream bars
that we didn't eat. Probably hiring additional people to check
everyone's Digital badges, and the number of their 'guests' would
have cost a lot more than the amount that DEC would have saved, and
the irritation caused by people having to wait in line while their
children were being counted, would be incredible.
On the other hand, if I *had* been able to give my ticket to someone
else, it would have given me a lot of pleasure and satisfaction to
know that [for example] some co-worker's child was able to have a
better time as a result of being able to bring a friend. It would
have made me feel the same as I have on occasion when I contributed
our Christmas turkey to a charity.
I feel badly that people are losing their jobs. I think a good case
could be made for discontinuing the Canobie Lake outings -- at least
until Digital's profitability returns to normal; but I don't see
any connection with a few people sharing tickets for Canobie, and
others losing their jobs. I see a lot of waste going on at Digital
every day, in areas where nobody seems to care. That does make
me mad.
IMHO,
Chuck
|
1612.38 | | LUDWIG::JOERILEY | Used Oats Are Cheaper | Wed Oct 02 1991 04:02 | 8 |
|
Doesn't Digital pay acording to how many empolyees request tickets?
If I'm intitled to 5 tickets and request that many doesn't DEC pay for
that many wether I go or not. If this is so then it would be a waste
not to give them to somebody that wants to go if for some reason I
can't.
Joe
|
1612.39 | Look out! Big Brother is watching!!!! | CSLALL::MBLANCHARD | Life in the Slow Lane...... | Wed Oct 02 1991 07:55 | 8 |
| Well I got the tickets for our outing and my Name and badge was
written on each ticket. I was supprised to find the tickets this way
but it didn't bother me. others were a different story... lot's of
complaints like " If I want to give my ticket to someone else, why
shouldn't I be able to" or "What am I going to do when my Grandson
gives a ticket with someone elses name on it?".
Mike
|
1612.40 | flat rate. no variances. | SOLVIT::BUCZYNSKI | | Wed Oct 02 1991 10:13 | 5 |
| re: a few back
My understanding is that DEC pays a flat fee to Canobie lake for
this event. The food and labor are donated by Tobin's. If fewer people
show up there is no rebate. If more attend there is no surcharge.
|
1612.41 | | CIS1::FULTI | | Wed Oct 02 1991 11:45 | 10 |
| I fail to understand why Canobie would even care if more people than
expected showed up. It would be totally to their favor if more did
show up. The park is open til 5pm period, therefore, no more of an
expense is incurred. However, the park does have some of it's own
booths open, i.e. games of chance, food, etc, etc. It would be
to the parks advantage to have a large of a crowd as possible attend.
The losers are the employees and their family as the more people
attend the less rides on the attractions they get.
- George
|
1612.42 | | LJOHUB::AKER | | Wed Oct 02 1991 13:26 | 3 |
| It is my understanding that Tobin get 10 percent over there food and
labor cost so the more your throw away the more they get payed....
also who verifies how much food tobin says we ate??????
|
1612.43 | My Opinion | ELWOOD::CHRISTIE | | Wed Oct 02 1991 14:04 | 14 |
| I cannot verify this as fact as I was told this by someone who has
attended several Canobie Lake outings. He has seen some of the
people who live in the area climb over the back fence to take
advantage of a free day of rides and food.
IMHO
If Digital does pay for the food, then it would be normal procedure
to put the contract out for bid. If Tobin comes in with the lowest
bid, they would be hired. It would be nice if companies stopped
this practice and hired vendors based on quality, not price.
Linda
|
1612.44 | always enjoy the day, but not a 'most-important' benefit... | MAST::DEBRIAE | Erik | Wed Oct 02 1991 15:48 | 14 |
|
I would think that Digital pays a flat rate for the day, seeing as
the entire place is reserved *only* for DEC employees. Whether 20
people or 20,000 people go, it's not as if Canobie could have
squeezed a few more paying patrons in. The place is Digital's for
the day, so I'm sure 'we' pay a flat rate for the place that day.
I went. But if I didn't go, I'd rather have someone else's children
able to enjoy it instead of having this event 'go to waste' when it is
already paid for. I'm more concerned about the number of people who
do not go... if everyone stays home, why bother running the thing
and reserving the entire place just for a handful of interested people?
-Erik
|
1612.45 | Here's my Gripe... | ASDG::FOSTER | Calico Cat | Thu Oct 03 1991 17:45 | 22 |
| As a big amusement park fan, I look forward to Canobie Lake every year.
But I have a BIG problem. I love going with a crowd, and the majority
of my friends don't work at my site. So, for the past several years,
I've been one of those abusers who borrows people's tickets from other
sites and gets a big group together. There have never been more
non-DECies than DEC'ies, we just don't feel like waiting 'til October
to go.
This year, my date was October, the first time since I've started that
we had such a late date. So I obtained tickets from a couple in another
plant, and planned to go with friends in September. It rained...
I'm going on my appointed day.
I don't think of myself as an abuser. I don't take more than my
allotted number of tickets, DEC wide. I just don't always go on the day
I'm supposed to... or some of my friends don't. Its not like we go
twice that year. It surprises me that DEC doesn't consider the fact
that many of us make strong connections to people other sites, and make
provisions for us to swap tickets, instead of penalizing us and giving
us a day in October. After all, we're a networking company, right?
|
1612.46 | Once upon a time.... | GEMINI::GIBSON | | Fri Oct 04 1991 14:53 | 12 |
| At one time it was possible to request a different date than the one
assigned to your site. I did it myself once. Personnel arranged with
one of the assigned sites to obtain some tickets for you. I suspect the
logistics became so complicated that the "your site day or the
alternate day" policy was enacted.
That isn't always great, either. Was it three years ago that a number
of the days were rained out? The last day was so crowded people could
barely move around the park, and Tobin ran out of food. People were
getting a greasy, cold hamburger on their plates without a bun. Yech!!
Linda
|
1612.47 | I don't go anymore | UPBEAT::JFERGUSON | Judy Ferguson-SPS Business Support | Fri Oct 11 1991 14:56 | 12 |
| My children love to go to Canobie Lake. But we now go only during the
summer. Both of my children requested that I NOT get tickets to the
outing for the past several years. Why? Because it was too crowded.
I refuse to give my tickets to others because it is causes some of
the overcrowding and frankly, they're not entitled to them. They are
entitled to self and guest or spouse, children and guest -- period.
Besides, this is supposed to be a FAMILY outing. My idea of a family
outing is parents spending time with their children rather than
children spending time with their friends.
Judy
|
1612.48 | What happened??? | NECSC::EINES | CSC/MA SNA product support | Mon Oct 14 1991 13:06 | 9 |
| Does anyone know what happened this past Saturday, 10/12? It was my
alternate date, and upon arrival at the park there was a sign
"Postponed until Sunday" with no other explanation. I was pretty
disappointed, although VERY glad I did not have a carload of children,
like so many of the other arrivals. It was a nice foliage tour driving
up there, but that's not exactly why I went.
Fred
|
1612.49 | bad weather was predicted | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Mon Oct 14 1991 13:20 | 10 |
| It was announced here about mid-afternoon on Friday that it was
postponed because of predicted bad weather for Saturday. Actually the
weather here was not as bad as predicted, but I don't know about
Canobie Lake; there were some heavy rainstorms south and east of here
(HLO), so there may have been some in that area as well. Plus some of
the rides cannot be operated in high winds, which we had all day. You
were supposed to listen to some Am radio station (I think) for info if
the weather looked iffy.
/Charlotte
|
1612.50 | WBZ-radio | AKOCOA::BBARRY | N@ �bad &U? | Mon Oct 14 1991 13:52 | 3 |
| I heard announcements on WBZ radio that the "Digital family outing for
Saturday was postponed until Sunday". I heard them several times
between 9:00am and noon.
|
1612.51 | | ROYALT::KOVNER | Everything you know is wrong! | Mon Oct 14 1991 14:15 | 9 |
| While I made it on our site's regular day,
our site personnel sent out email on Friday indicating that the alternate
date was postponed. (Good work, Debbie.) (She also sent out mail detailing
who was eligible for tickets, when they were being distributed.) Perhaps we just
have better personnel than other sites.
On other years, when the weather was uncertain, I've called Canobie. I don't
have the number, but you can get it from long-distance information, or local
information, if you live in NH. The call is a lot cheaper than the gas.
|
1612.52 | Thanks | NECSC::EINES | CSC/MA SNA product support | Mon Oct 14 1991 15:01 | 11 |
| Thanks for the info, folks. Funny, I've been going for 8 years now
and wasn't aware of the "procedure". It might be nice if it was
printed on the tickets.
Of course, the fact that THE WEATHER WAS FINE only adds insult to
injury. I've been there in the rain, and gotten a little soggy but had
a fine time. Live and learn, I guess.
Fred
|
1612.53 | | SCARGO::CONNELL | Shivers and Tears | Mon Oct 14 1991 15:14 | 12 |
| Yeah, we were informed of the day change also. The problem was that for
a number of Wage class 2's, the info came out 5 minutes after they went
home. Some showed up and found that the park was closed. I was some
angry, when I saw what the actual weather was like on Saturday. I ended
up disappointing the children because our travel arraingments could not
be set up for Sunday. (Sat. was the only possible day for us). I ended
up venting this anger through judicious use of my rake and I now have
some extremely chatised leaves. :-) I am disappointed by the way this
was hadled. Bad enough that our site missed it's regularly scheduled
day because it was on our EOQ work Saturday and now this has to happen.
Phil
|
1612.54 | Re .52 | STAR::PARKE | I'm a surgeon, NOT Jack the Ripper | Tue Oct 15 1991 09:58 | 3 |
| The "procedures" for determining cancellations, and reschedules are printed
in the (this year) green folder. They have been every year I have gone that
I read the thing.
|
1612.55 | Somebody had to ask | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Thu Aug 06 1992 10:31 | 5 |
| I don't want to start a debate on whether or not the company should
hold this outing. I'm only curious, giving the current financial
climate, if the Canobie Lake outing is still "on" this year. One of my
kids asked me, and I hadn't heard anything...And, yes, I know I can
take them any time and just pay myself.
|
1612.56 | | ROYALT::KOVNER | Everything you know is wrong! | Thu Aug 06 1992 18:15 | 2 |
| I don't know for sure, but a memo from Personnel included their calendar,
and it included Canobie. I guess its on this year.
|
1612.57 | Yes, Canobie Lake is continuing. | CASDOC::MEAGHER | Term limits for Bush & Quayle | Fri Aug 07 1992 10:07 | 12 |
| Here's from a memo from personnel I received this morning:
Digital's family outings will be held again at Canobie Lake Park in
Salem, New Hampshire. The Southern New Hampshire site dates are as
follows:
Sunday - September 20 Saturday - October 10
--------------------- ---------------------
NIO DDD DOO
NUO DSG GSF
TTB MKO NQO
ZKO
|
1612.58 | | MIPSBX::thomas | The Code Warrior | Fri Aug 07 1992 20:53 | 1 |
| And I thought Westford (DSG) was in Mass....
|
1612.59 | cancelled? | SALEM::BERUBE_C | Claude, G. | Fri Aug 21 1992 11:57 | 9 |
| I just recieved a forwarded memo that came from our site Canobie Lake
cordinator stating that this years outing has been cancelled by
Corporate and it's be posted in Livewire today.
Has anyone been able to get into livewire?
our vtx server has been unavailable for a while now.
CLaude
|
1612.60 | hmmmm............ | ELWOOD::MCATEE | | Fri Aug 21 1992 12:08 | 2 |
|
I just checked livewire and saw nothing re: canobie
|
1612.61 | rumors travel faster than truth | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Fri Aug 21 1992 12:18 | 4 |
| If so, why did I get my coupon for tickets yesterday???
-sandy
|
1612.62 | Oops, I hit EX too soon! | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Fri Aug 21 1992 12:52 | 20 |
| Look what I just got!!!!!
From: WECARE::LAPERLE "Terri, OSAG Personnel, 381-0683 21-Aug-1992 1123" 21-AUG-1992 11:20:36.68
To: @MGRSUPV.DIS,@SEC.DIS
CC: LAPERLE
Subj: UPDATE - Canobie Lake
********* PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO ALL EMPLOYEES
Please note that Bob Palmer has cancelled Canobie Lake ... notices will be on
VTX from him later today.
During these difficult times, I think we can all understand the rationale
behind this decision.
Terri
|
1612.63 | Personnel memo re:Canobie outing | SSGV01::CHALMERS | NOT the mama! | Fri Aug 21 1992 12:53 | 23 |
| <posted with permission/other forwardings deleted>
From: KALAH::TAYLOR 20-AUG-1992 16:31:23.75
To: DONVAN::WRIGHT
CC:
Subj: for IM
From: WECARE::WECARE::GRAVELLE "Lee - Personnel Manager - 381-0607 20-Aug-1992 1531" 20-AUG-1992 15:35:08.99
To: @COTTER,@GEOGRAPHY,@PSA
CC: LEE
Subj: CANOBIE LAKE OUTING CANCELLED
FYI only -
We've just received word that as of 4:00 p.m. yesterday, Bob Palmer
has cancelled the Canobie Lake outing for DEC employee's this year.
My understanding is that there will be a message from Palmer in VTX
on Friday, 8/21 announcing the decision - Terrie McInnis, EAC focal point
for the ZKO Site Cluster, will also receive an E-Mail copy for distribution
throughout the site.
|
1612.64 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Fri Aug 21 1992 13:10 | 8 |
| What comes to my mind about the cancellation is that this was the one
"reward" where one didn't have to have an excellent sales record to
enjoy!!!
There goes my Circle of Excellence!
-sandy
|
1612.66 | sigh....wan... | STOKES::BURT | | Fri Aug 21 1992 13:50 | 14 |
| turkeys, too??
I agree with incentive lost. Sales wouldn't be able to sell if it
wasn't for the rest of us putting it all together and making it all
work.
My budget is tight and my kids really look forward to that and No, DEC
doesn't owe my kids anything.
I'm hoping it's some TFSOer's idea of a joke to spread that around.
Then again, if not- we'll survive. Hell, just cancel the food and keep
the rides!
Reg.
|
1612.67 | | MEMORY::BROWER | | Fri Aug 21 1992 13:54 | 5 |
| My kids will also be very disappointed. Heck I'd have been willing
to pay say $5.00-$10.00 a head at the gate for the privlege of a
company day..
Bob
|
1612.68 | Might be too late to cancel? | WMOIS::MACK_J | | Fri Aug 21 1992 13:56 | 32 |
| AS of about one minute ago, there was nothing on LIVEWIRE or
the VTX about cancellation of Canobi Lake Park this year. I
remember a conversation on this about a year ago, however,
which amounts to Digital pays for this event well in advance,
and contracts with Canobi Lake Park for all of those weekends
after Labor Day when the Park Officially closes. My understanding
is that in the past it's been booked for 'years' in advance.
This was done, to avoid NOT being able to get the dates because
other firms etc. would be looking at taking them. Now, this doesn't
mean that it hasn't been, or won't be cancelled. What it does mean
is that like WANG's Hawaii vacation for Top Achievers, going on
even as we speak today (and WANG just filed Chap. 11) it may be
something that is so far in the works that cancelling would be
a moot point financially.
In these times it would make sense to cut costs on just about
everything, including such things as the outing. Frankly, year
after year everyone is advised to get only tickets for themselves
and their family, which is why we always see parents with 18 kids
etc. arriving at the Park. Last year, I recall a large van pulling
up beside us at the park, with two adults and about 8 kids involved,
some of whom asked their Aunt what time they had to meet back! So,
it's expensive, and abused, and I think we all know of folks who
do that sort of thing. I'd much prefer to see folks keep their
jobs versus riding the rollercoaster one last time on Digital,
or getting their Turkey for that matter. However, I'm not sure
cutting those out would make any difference in the long run.
Just a couple pennies worth
J
|
1612.69 | | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | Life is a Do_It_Yourself project! | Fri Aug 21 1992 14:03 | 11 |
|
To quote a person who's name escapes me at the moment, but it was a
politician if I recall....
"A few million here, a few million there, and pretty soon your talking
real money!"
The speaker was refering to spending it rather than saving it, but the
idea is the same.....
Vic
|
1612.70 | | SCHOOL::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes | Fri Aug 21 1992 14:19 | 2 |
| The late Everett Dirckson said that.
Denny
|
1612.71 | No doubt it adds up to "Real Money" | A1VAX::BARTH | Shun the frumious Bandersnatch | Fri Aug 21 1992 14:35 | 6 |
| And Senator Dirkson referred to "a billion here and a billion there..."
^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
But it still seems very suitable to our company's situation.
K.
|
1612.72 | less than perfect recall.... | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | Life is a Do_It_Yourself project! | Fri Aug 21 1992 15:00 | 7 |
|
RE:Last 2...
Thanks for the corrections.....millions, billions, hey it does add up
to real money! 8^)
Vic
|
1612.73 | | SPEZKO::BELFORTI | Serendipity = Dumb Luck | Fri Aug 21 1992 15:01 | 4 |
| Oh no.... does this mean what I think it does???
Canobie Lake has been TSFO'ed????
|
1612.74 | Why not DO IT on your own? | RIPPLE::NORDLAND_GE | Waiting for Perot :^) | Fri Aug 21 1992 15:03 | 15 |
|
RE: a few back - said it's worth $5 or $10 bucks to have an outing
If you like the idea of a group outing with your kids, why don't
you do it anyway? Would you only go if DEC fed you? Or only if they
bought you a ticket? Do you receive ANY other benefits? Like getting
together with your group? Like seeing each other's kids/spouses that
are just pictures on desks? Etc.
DEC is not our Mother! If you want to go, just do it anyway! It's
unlikely that Canobie could rebook anyway. BTW, aren't these Company
days after their regular closing? You better call.
JN, Seattle (formerly Marlboro)
|
1612.75 | Officially..... | MILORD::BISHOP | Success depends more upon character than upon intellect | Fri Aug 21 1992 15:35 | 54 |
|
[headers removed]
-----------------Forwarded item dated 21-AUG-1992 14:20:23.47-----------------
Subj: OUTINGS CANCELLATION ANNOUNCEMENT 1
From: NAME: John Sims
FUNC: Strategic Resources
TEL: 223-7243 <SIMS.JOHN AT A1 at CORA @ CORE>
To: See Below
CC: See Below
**********************************************************
THIS MEMO IS FROM THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
**********************************************************
We are reviewing our business plans and objectives as part of our work
to return Digital to profitable growth. One of our major goals in
these reviews is a significant reduction of our discretionary expenses.
Those reviews continue, however, we have made a decision to cancel all
Company paid employee outings worldwide, effective immediately,
(i.e., employee days at Canobie Lake Park in the U.S. and the employee
Summer Picnic in Geneva or other similar activity).
We recognize that these outings have been one of the traditional
ways the Company has celebrated and shown appreciation for the
efforts of all employees. Dedication and hard work are more
appreciated and more necessary than ever. The challenge is to
find alternative ways to show appreciation that are tied to
the success of our Company. We are committed to meeting that
challenge.
Over the next several months, we will identify and communicate
other expense reduction decisions in all aspects of our business.
Your support and participation in helping us to identify and
implement expense control opportunities is critical to Digital's
long term viability, particularly in the area of activities that
do not directly enhance our efforts to improve the way we conduct
our business.
Please disseminate this memo throughout your organizations.
Thank you for your support and commitment.
------------ End forwarded message
|
1612.76 | from livewire | SALEM::BERUBE_C | Claude, G. | Fri Aug 21 1992 16:06 | 36 |
| Worldwide News LIVE WIRE
Employee outings cancelled worldwide
Digital's Executive Committee has issued a memo regarding the cancellation
of employee outings worldwide in light of current business conditions.
Following is the text of the memo.
-------------------------------------------------
We are reviewing our business plans and objectives as part of our work to
return Digital to profitable growth. One of our major goals in these
reviews is a significant reduction of our discretionary expenses.
Those reviews continue, however we have made a decision to cancel all
company paid employee outings worldwide, effective immediately (i.e.,
employee days at Canobie Lake Park in the U.S. and the employee Summer
Picnic in Geneva or other similar activity).
We recognize that these outings have been one of the traditional ways the
company has celebrated and shown appreciation for the efforts of all
employees. Dedication and hard work are more appreciated and more necessary
than ever. The challenge is to find alternative ways to show appreciation
that are tied to the success of our company. We are committed to meeting
that challenge.
Over the next several months, we will identify and communicate other expense
reduction decisions in all aspects of our business. Your support and
participation in helping us to identify and implement expense control
opportunities is critical to Digital's long term viability, particularly in
the area of activities that do not directly enhance our efforts to improve
the way we conduct our business.
Please disseminate this memo throughout your organizations.
Thank you for your support and commitment.
|
1612.77 | | SALEM::BERUBE_C | Claude, G. | Fri Aug 21 1992 16:10 | 10 |
| With this coming rather late, I wonder how this will affect Canobie
Lake, can't imaging that they have had a record year with the weather
that New England has had this summer (rain and below normal temps).
I'm sure they must of been looking forward to the annual income they
recieved from DEC to operate.
Claude
PS Does this mean that those sites served by Tobins will be having
Hamburger/Hot Dogs etc. specials in the coming months? ;^)
|
1612.78 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Fri Aug 21 1992 16:58 | 30 |
| I've gone maybe half of the years I've worked at Digital, and frankly,
I'm not upset at this cancellation, especially if it helps us
to be more competitive. What does anger me a little though, is the
apparent inconsistency in the decision to cancel the events a scant
few weeks before they were to be held, and the statement quoted below,
which we was given about this time last year:
from 1612.19:
> {EXTRACTED FROM VTX DELTA, 24-JUL-1991}
>
>
>Employee Appreciation Events
>
> .
> .
> .
>We have again examined our position on special appreciation events like
>Canobie Lake and the distribution of Turkeys. These events take a considerable
>time to prepare and decisions must be made well in advance of any such event.
> .
> .
> .
It would appear that these decisions don't need to be made
well in advance of the events after all. Were we lied to before,
were the DELTA people misinformed, or did the lead time change?
Or am I missing something?
Tom_K
|
1612.79 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Fri Aug 21 1992 17:02 | 10 |
| I suspect that these decisions do need to be made well in advance
of the events to be done right. In other words to get out with no
cost. However, if you are willing to pay something for nothing more
then not paying as much you can make it later. I suspect that this
year someone without an emotional stake in the event happening decided
that we should take the penalty of losing what ever money we had to
put down up front rather than spend a lot more on actually holding the
event.
Alfred
|
1612.80 | Off with their heads! | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, ISV Tech. Support | Fri Aug 21 1992 17:25 | 9 |
| Does anybody remember 1982? We were celebrating the 25th anniversary
of the Company with a special Canobie Lake outing, cakes in the shape
of the Mill clocktower, etc. Only trouble was that business was bad
right then and the mood wasn't for celebrating. They didn't cancel
that year, but lots of people groused that it was an unnecessary
expense.
I think they did the right thing. Maybe business will get better in
time to save the turkeys. (not from the turkey's viewpoint)
|
1612.81 | Selectively implemented re:.76 | GUIDUK::GREEN | Head vs Brick -- Wall wins! | Fri Aug 21 1992 17:33 | 7 |
| Surely (by the wording) they mean only outings which do not reflect
"appreciation that [is] tied to the success of our company."
I would think that COE (Excellence), DEC100, etc. will go on as
planned, as would any other "contribution recognition" related event.
???
|
1612.82 | Look for pay toilets next | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Fri Aug 21 1992 17:42 | 19 |
| This still rubs me the wrong way. Nickel and dime stuff like this
does little to affect the bottom line of the company. However, it
*does* demotivate people. We're being asked to work harder with fewer
people to turn the company around. Meanwhile, we're going to cancel any
small pats on the back...but trust us, we're going to figure out a way
to reward people down the road. Yeah...right...
If it had been me, what I would have done was send out a memo that
stated that because of the tough times, they had to take a hard look at
such things as Canobie Lake...and strongly considered cancelling them.
HOWEVER, as a thank-you to the remaining employees and to help foster
the team spirit and show appreciation for the hard work, they decided to
go ahead with the outings as planned.
Suddenly, we'd all be saying to ourselves, wow! What a nice thing for
them to do...forgetting that it was the same ol' Canobie Lake outing nobody
is really thrilled about. I guess if we're really so hard-up for money that
even this presents a problem, it might be turkey hotdogs this year afterall
instead of turkeys (when a friend of mine who left DEC and went to Sun was
recently bragging to me on the phone about his $5k Christmas bonus last
year, I said, "Hey, but you didn't get a turkey."
|
1612.83 | No matter what it takes, we must downsize | ASICS::LESLIE | Andy Leslie | Fri Aug 21 1992 18:14 | 1 |
| Anything that gets people out of the door....Right?
|
1612.84 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Fri Aug 21 1992 18:15 | 16 |
| > when a friend of mine who left DEC and went to Sun was
> recently bragging to me on the phone about his $5k Christmas bonus last
> year, I said, "Hey, but you didn't get a turkey."
Er, how much profit did SUN make last year?
Rewards based on contributions to the company's success do seem
the way to go, Rather than a annual company event that really
has no relation to effort. For example, award or incentive programs
for sales, and "release events" to reward engineering groups upon
completion of projects. That leaves out some groups that don't
have event based milestones, but I am sure that folks who work
in those types of groups would have no trouble with determining
and suggesting equivalent displays of appreciation.
Tom_K
|
1612.85 | I don't think too many people are in celebrating moods | TOHOPE::REESE_K | Three Fries Short of a Happy Meal | Fri Aug 21 1992 18:29 | 31 |
| Perhaps the suggestion for those interested in going - organize; isn't
a bad idea. I guess the folks in the field must have known for some
time there wasn't going to be a company "sponsored" picnic this year,
so our Employee Activities Committee made special arrangements with
a popular water park (or was it Six Flags) for special discounted
rates for DEC employees. So, those families who enjoy these types
of outings and getting togethers with fellow employees were at least
able to get together. Sure, they had to pay some money; but the price
for the ticket negotiated by the EAC was *considerably* less than any
individual family would have to pay if they just decided to go on
their own.
BTW, Canobie Lake wasn't the only place where some employees took
advantage of the free outing and brought folks who were not members
of their immediate families (or in some case, not related at all).
I'm single and haven't attended one of these functions in years; the
last year DEC sponsored an event the caterers ran out of food because
some people brought more guests than they should have. If any fellow
employee had asked me for my tickets so they could bring extra guests
I would have given them up, but no one asked. Apparently the site
of the function was told to anticipate XXX people; so the early
arrivers gobbled up the food and some DEC employees who arrived late
found the cupboard bare and wound up purchasing all their food. <---
considering some of the old notes and comments on Tobins, at least
field people got to eat a little better :-) But there were a few
instances where Mom and Pop hadn't anticipated having to feed their
kids (none of these parks are cheap on food prices) so the day wound
up quickly.......the kids rode the rides, but then had to go home to
eat :-(
|
1612.86 | A voice from The Trenches | RTPSWS::ANITA | What? Me, worry? | Fri Aug 21 1992 18:37 | 44 |
|
.66> I agree with incentive lost. Sales wouldn't be able to sell if it
.66> wasn't for the rest of us putting it all together and making it all
.66> work.
Have you ever been involved with The Customer or participated in a sale???
Have you ever tried to get answers out of a group external to yours or
"seamlessly" integrated our products?
I'm usually a voyeur of this conference, but, as my blood was getting ready
to boil out of my veins, from reading some of the ideas for "fixing" DEC's
current situation as well as the insular thinking that seems to predominate
within Engineering, I felt compelled...
First of all, I've been with Digital for over 11 years now, almost 9 years of
which were spent in a Manufacturing Process Engineering group in Acton and
Tewksbury, Massachusetts, involved with most of the new products coming
out of what used to be known as Mid-Range Systems, so I'm not a neophyte when
it comes to the internal workings of Digital. I decided I wanted to see how
the other side of the business (read: the Field) operated, and I made the move
to a Sales Office in Research Triangle Park (North Carolina) as a Sales Support
person, supporting ULTRIX systems, and manufacturing companies, (CAD/CAM/CAE,
FDC, MRPII, etc.), amongst varied accounts in the Carolinas Account Group.
The move was due, in part, to seeing the handwriting on the wall a few years
back, in terms of the longevity of a career in Manufacturing ("rightsizing"
was just beginning), and the other was to broaden my outlook on how our
products are used by "real" people.
To say the least, I've had some interesting experiences - some good, some bad -
but I'm glad I did it. The Sales folks have earned my respect, especially
in trying to sell products that our customers don't want or need, but that our
own engineers think are the greatest thing since sliced bread! Trust me, it
doesn't all work together as advertised, and trying to get someone in Eng'g.
Mfg. or even Mktg. to take accountability is like pulling teeth! My
experiences in the Field, to date, has lent credence to my belief that the
GMA really *is* Ivory Tower - it's a tough market out there (I'm starting to
sound a little like Rodney Dangerfield). And, yes, I used to think the same
thing - "These guys have expense accounts, cars, car phones, etc. - what a
cushy life!" But, then, I also used to think that those in ZKO who were lucky
enough to have a *real* cafeteria and a Wellness Centre had it better off than
me. Guess it'll always be the Have vs. the Have-nots...
I'm donning my flame-retardant coveralls now... I'm going back in to my
trench...
|
1612.87 | bad feelings | WIDGET::KLEIN | | Fri Aug 21 1992 18:41 | 29 |
| > Rewards based on contributions to the company's success do seem
> the way to go, Rather than a annual company event that really
> has no relation to effort.
I don't agree. There are events that are designed to reward a subset of
your employees for their efforts (or, better, for their "results").
Other events are for human camaraderie. Canobie Lake was the latter.
What really bothers me is that I would have shelled out 5 or 10 bucks (maybe
even $15) each for tickets to go to a Company Day at Canobie Lake Park, but
going by myself (even with my family) is not the same. The real pleasure
for me was bumping into old friends, some of whom I only see from
year-to-year at the Park. Who cares what their last Performance Rating
was - it was a day to mingle, eat, and watch the kids have fun. And I
DID like the food!
I wish that they had done something other than outright cancellation. They
could have, for example, given each employee one "free" ticket, with, say,
a 10 dollar charge for each additional one. Heck, even when my child
goes on a school trip, they often ask for a "donation" to pay for museum
admission. This would have solved the eight-nieces-and-nephews-in-a-van
problem, too.
Gee, we might even have been able to MAKE money on the event! And had fun
at the same time.
When the Company Picnic gets cancelled, ya gotta worry bigtime.
-steve-
|
1612.88 | Sorry, but this is 'bad timing' | ACESMK::KOSMATKA | Ron Kosmatka | Fri Aug 21 1992 19:03 | 41 |
| Re - .82
I agree.
To decide not to hold this event so close to when it would normally
be held is strictly a "knee-jerk" reaction without any thought to the
source of the stimulus causing the knee to jerk!
This company outing is/was a family day - a reward, of sorts, for doing
my best for the company (hey, it's the only 'reward' the company gave me
this year). My family has gone to, and looked forward to, this outing for
each of the 11+ years I've worked for the company. It was a 'nice' touch
- something done by the company for which it should be proud. It was a
symbol that the company "cared" about the person it asked to work for them.
It made it easier to feel part of the comapny, the family - rather then
a me/them atmosphere.
But a "nickle and dime" mentality seems to have taken over, very much
"penny wise and pound foolish." What the hey, many in this company seem to
be operating this way lately ... (oops, it slipped).
Cynicism aside, cancel the next one .. an announcement which said:
"We regret to inform you that this will be probably the last
family outing at (where ever) sponsored by Digital. Blah,
blah, etc., etc. We hope to resume similar functions in the
future when we get things are turned around (or words to that
effect.)"
would be much easier to accept and deal with. We know, in advance, what
is coming and what is not.
In a way it almost seems that DEC (the parent) has just decided to 'punish'
the employee (the child) for something (profitablity) the "parent" is most
responsible for (i.e, product planning, overseeing development costs and
schedules, marketing, etc.)
It is ironic, however, that this decision has no effect on my family this
year. If all goes according to current plans, I'll be TSFO'd by then
(gee there's that profitability thing again!).
|
1612.89 | It could certainly have been handled better | MLTVAX::SCONCE | Bill Sconce | Fri Aug 21 1992 19:26 | 35 |
| .84> Rewards based on contributions to the company's success do seem
.84> the way to go, Rather than a annual company event that really
.84> has no relation to effort.
I'm afraid I don't agree, either. Canobie was intended to say "thank you
for being an employee, we're glad you're here". It was important that it
NOT be related to "contributions to the company's success".
In fact, the latter kind of thinking is fraught with a major difficulty:
how "contributions to the company's success" shall be measured, and by whom.
Some areas aren't very glamorous (say, PDP-11 engineering, Tom?), but
keeping old customers happy might be an important contribution...
Or what about someone who gives a genuine 200% effort, but who happens to
be in a project which COSTS the company a major bundle because of poor
planning?
Sorry. We don't fix the current problems by some new scheme for rewards
and disincentives at the workerbee level. The problem isn't at the
workerbee level. (Says Bill, who readily admits to not being even the
brightest or most productive workerbee he knows.) What we have to hear
if ANYONE is going to believe in better times coming is not Canobie
cancellations, or even continuing layoffs, but a strategy. Bob Palmer's
first major statement of direction for us should have been a major
opportunity; it'll be a shame if he's squandered that on a cheap-looking
short-range tactic.
As far as Canobie itself goes, I don't go myself. Perhaps Canobie WAS
a benefit whose expense should properly be saved in these times. (I
probably feel that way.) Even then, Digital could have handled it without
looking so uncaring. They could have paid NOTHING, but merely encouraged
Canobie management to offer a "Digital Day", with whatever discounts
they could swallow. Then families could still be together, for a price,
Digital could have woven a nice message around cost-savings-but-still-
caring, and Canobie would have had SOME Digital business.
|
1612.90 | | CALLME::MR_TOPAZ | | Fri Aug 21 1992 19:57 | 26 |
| I've never gone to Canobie Lake, and it's not likely that I ever
would go.
But I'm sorry that it has been dropped because the people hurt by
this are the everyday Joes and Janes who work for the company and
their kids whose tales of having fun and going on rides and eating
too much amusement-park food were day-after topics in every
office. The people hurt by this are, for the most part, the least
powerful and the least politically influential in the company.
And that's too bad.
Within the next few week (before September 10th, I have heard),
the company has to decide whether or not to continue its
sponsorship of the Seniors pro golf tournament in 1993. Now,
unlike Canobie Lake, I have taken adavntage of the free employee
tickets in the past couple of years. I don't know how much the
tournament costs the company; I do know that the tournament is an
opportunity for some of the company's biggest wigs to schmooze
with the pro golfers, particularly during the pro-am tournament.
Will the Digital Seniors Classic and its perks be continued in
1993?
--Mr Topaz
--Mr Topaz
|
1612.91 | Disappointing, but ... | MCIS2::SHERWIN | Jim Sherwin | Fri Aug 21 1992 23:18 | 25 |
| I, like many, am disappointed by the loss of this event. My family
avidly looked forward to and thoroughly enjoyed the day at Canobie Lake.
I also believe it was the right decision. Proceeding with this event,
would be akin to "Nero fiddling while Rome burned".
The text of the Sims memo is not clear if this decision is for FY93
or permanently. A permanent cancellation would be a mistake, I think,
indicative of a structural change to our system of values. One noter
indicated Palmer would be issuing something on this cancellation. If
he does, I hope he is more definitive on the scope of the cancellation.
There were a couple of references to "nickel and dime mentality" in
this latest series of replies. When the cost of Canobie is compared
to our restructuring loses or even our recent operating loses, Canobie
is indeed dwarfed, as are most of our costs when considered on an
individual basis. However, if we limit ourselves to the MEGA-costsaving
opportunities, we will miss a mountain of small and medium opportunities
which collectively add up to big bucks.
Given the season, likening the struggle we find ourselves in to a
baseball game; the champion is not the team with the most home runs,
but the team which consistently hits the singles and doubles. I think
we just hit a double. It's up to the next batter to bring us home.
|
1612.92 | | TIGEMS::ARNOLD | Call me if you don't get this | Sat Aug 22 1992 10:49 | 26 |
| I fail to see the difference between cancelling Canobie and cancelling
(or more accurately, NOT cancelling) COE. COE is for far fewer people,
but I'm sure at much greater overall expense to the company. I've
always viewed Canobie at a big "thank you" to my wife & son for the
disrupted evenings/weekends to accomplish Digital business, the
"leaving at noon Sunday for a Monday morning meeting", etc.
This is indeed a big incentive-burner. I'm sure I (and many others)
helped to get many COE winners to their big uncancelled expensive
hoopla, yet this cancellation in effect negates those contributions, as
if those COE winners would have won anyway without our help, which I
don't believe is true at all.
I really don't mind putting in an occasional weekend, giving up some
evenings to pursue Digital business, because it's the right thing to
do, especially in these economic times. But the Canobie cancellation
takes away the "corporate thanks" to both me & my family for the team
efforts expended on closing business. And even at a normal 40
hours/week (don't remember the last week I worked that few hours), most
large projects are a team effort, from the strict 40-hrs/week person to
the 80+ hrs/week workaholic.
Maybe the turkeys will be bigger this year to compensate. (Caught
right next to the flying pigs farm...)
Jon
|
1612.93 | Avoiding the appearance of impropriety? | TALLIS::PARADIS | Music, Sex, and Cookies | Sun Aug 23 1992 13:17 | 17 |
| Here's a point I'm surprised I haven't seen raised yet in this
topic: Wang has been taking a bit of public-opinion heat for
having a bunch of its sales types living it up in Hawaii at the
same time that they filed Chapter 11. None of the logical
explanations ("It was already paid for" "It's a regular part of
the total compensation package" "It's a reward for a job well
done") washed in the court of public opinion. Right or wrong,
the average folks' opinion of this was that it was a pretty
crass thing to do.
This might have been why Palmer made the decision he did, when he
did. The memo came out the day after the Wang story broke, and
I'm sure the desire to avoid adverse publicity was a large part of
the decision...
--jim
|
1612.94 | | ACOSTA::MIANO | John - NY Retail Banking Resource Cntr | Sun Aug 23 1992 21:13 | 16 |
| RE: .93
> Here's a point I'm surprised I haven't seen raised yet in this
> topic: Wang has been taking a bit of public-opinion heat for
> having a bunch of its sales types living it up in Hawaii at the
> same time that they filed Chapter 11. None of the logical
> explanations ("It was already paid for" "It's a regular part of
> the total compensation package" "It's a reward for a job well
> done") washed in the court of public opinion. Right or wrong,
> the average folks' opinion of this was that it was a pretty
> crass thing to do.
I think exactly the opposite. If there are sales folks at Wang who are
making their budgets and exceeding expectations then Wang should be
sending them to Hawaii. It would be the final nail in Wang's coffin if
they start shafting those people are are delivering the goods.
|
1612.95 | Canobie Lake a "local" thing ? | TODD::WARNOCK | Todd Warnock @CBO | Mon Aug 24 1992 07:51 | 13 |
| What about those of us in the field who *don't* get Canobie Lake and
*don't* get a turkey ?
I've been with DEC 5 years, have never gotten a turkey, and have never
had the opportunity to go to Canobie Lake. I'm curious as to how DEC
justifies the apparent expense for Canobie Lake for the "few" people in
the Northeast...
Let's tighten our belts during the rough times and be thankful we have
jobs... Maybe they'll send those of us in the Southern Area to Six
Flags/Disney World next year as "our" Canobie Lake...)
Todd
|
1612.96 | timing is everything | MRKTNG::SILVERBERG | Mark Silverberg DTN 264-2269 TTB1-5/B3 | Mon Aug 24 1992 08:39 | 8 |
| I just got the ticket distribution form to fill out to pick up the
tickets for the outing; our is (oooops was) scheduled for Sunday
9/20. Guess I'll just hold it as another DEC collector's item from
these times.
Mark
|
1612.97 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Aug 24 1992 08:49 | 15 |
| RE: .90
I agree Mr_Topaz.
I have gone to Canobie Park about 10 times with my family. All of us
look forward to the event, and frankly, with the number of children I
have and the fact that I'm an engineer, I can't really afford to
go otherwise.
I will be watching to see if the other events ,like the Digital Golf
Series is cancelled too....
Only with Olsen retiring would this event have been cancelled.
Marc H.
|
1612.98 | | A1VAX::DISMUKE | Say you saw it in NOTES... | Mon Aug 24 1992 09:59 | 3 |
| re .82---a tbought that crossed my mind! With all the layoffs, there
would be less people to enjoy Canobie anyway - couldn't thay have just
cancelled a few of the dates, not the whole pie????
|
1612.99 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Mon Aug 24 1992 10:14 | 12 |
| Don, I take your point, but it isn't totally an apples to
apples comparison. While our big wigs may do some shmoozing
with the pros, I understand that it is also a major opportunity
for our customers to shmooze as well.
Don't know how many customers attend Canobie Lake.
Of course, I'd rather that our customers bought Digital because
our products were good, than because we gave them an opportunity
to shmooze.
Tom_K
|
1612.100 | | BEING::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Mon Aug 24 1992 10:28 | 14 |
| I do not think anybody has mentioned the kids. Some children have been
told already that they were going to Canobie Lake Park, and some of
these kids are too young to understand why mommy or daddy is breaking
her or his promise.
I'm sure those parents will be rushing to get to Canobie on their own
before the park closes for the season, but many of them won't make it.
Digital invited those children, and employees. I have a written
invitation. Digital is breaking its promise.
It's not the first time.
-- edp
|
1612.101 | | CSLALL::LMURPHY | | Mon Aug 24 1992 10:44 | 22 |
| .86> The Sales folks have earned my respect...
.86> And, yes, I used to think the same thing...what a cushy life
.86> Have you ever been involved with The Customer....???
.66> Sales wouldn't be able to sell if it wasn't for the rest of us...
I have been strictly read in this conference...but I have to say I am
with .66 here I do work directly with the customer all the time in the
repair center. We have customers getting mad at us as a result of not
understanding what they have been sold. It seems to me and others i
work with that Sales does anything to get the sale...the rest of us
have to put up with the customer sat issues when they tell us "well,
sales told me, promised me, assured me, etc..." We have dealt with
Sales people who want us to give away the store rather than lose a
good customer who they have led to believe would be pampered with or
without buying the correct service from us.
I do not believe that Sales alone makes us work, I wish alot of them
didn't...we'd all probably pull together more if that were the case.
It saddens me that this one reward we get is taken away when so much
else is done for salespeople, among others.
|
1612.102 | There are worse things to explain. | CASDOC::MEAGHER | The best family value is a job. | Mon Aug 24 1992 10:47 | 17 |
| >>> I do not think anybody has mentioned the kids. Some children have been
>>> told already that they were going to Canobie Lake Park, and some of
>>> these kids are too young to understand why mommy or daddy is breaking
>>> her or his promise.
They're also too young to understand what it means when mommy or daddy gets
laid off.
Canobie Lake is a trivial thing, compared to the long-term survival of the
company. I assume (I hope) that Palmer is trying to get everyone's attention
that this is a new company. We may be seeing a few more of these moves, some of
which we'll like and some of which we won't.
I'd rather the company continue as a long-time player than maintain its folksy
traditions.
Vicki Meagher
|
1612.103 | "..grass is always greener..." | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Mon Aug 24 1992 10:54 | 5 |
| Re: .101
I would suggest that you gain the proper qualifications, and take a job in Sales.
Bob
|
1612.104 | Equity | GLDOA::PENFROY | Just Do It or Just Say No? | Mon Aug 24 1992 11:12 | 18 |
|
Question...
What is the dollar value per employee of the annual Canobie Lake
outing and the Thanksgiving Turkey?
Opinion...
Either EVERYONE should get these benefits or NO ONE should.
ONE COMPANY! New England AND the field.
Equity should not be based on your zip code.
--- Paul
|
1612.105 | | CSLALL::LMURPHY | | Mon Aug 24 1992 11:19 | 12 |
| RE: .103
It seems to me either Sales doesn't bother to learn the programs it is
selling OR doesn't care how it gets the sales that bring in their
rewards.
Either way...I don't want those "proper qualifications"
*** of course we don't hear from the satisfied customers...I will grant
you that...so change the above to some of Sales
====
|
1612.106 | Look at the alternatives | USCTR1::SMARINO | | Mon Aug 24 1992 11:29 | 9 |
| To me, I would much rather be in the position of working and being able
to spend my money and bring my family to Canobie rather than be given a
package and having to do the same.
I remember reading many notes after last years Canobie weekends where
people did nothing but complain about the food. Don't depend on a
company for these types of benefits in these economic times.
Be greatful that you have a job!
|
1612.107 | | AIMHI::BOWLES | | Mon Aug 24 1992 11:48 | 18 |
| I have a good friend who has worked at Sanders for more than 25 years.
They have their outings at Whalom Park. However, according to my
friend, there have been many years when Sanders did not have an outing.
Apparently, the outing was based on whether or not the company was
earning money that year. Makes sense to me.
Hey, these are tough times. Canobie Lake, IMHO, is one of those things
which should be discretionary based on our ability to fund the
"reward." This does not seem to be one of those years.
Did Sims' memo say this was a permanent cancellation? Nope. It was
carefully worded to avoid either making it permanent or implying that
the event would be held in future years. Digi-speak perhaps. But
let's get real. People are losing their jobs even as we speak. Should
those of us fortunate enough to remain be "partying" at Canobie Lake.
Not in my opinion.
Chet
|
1612.108 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Aug 24 1992 11:52 | 10 |
| re: .86
> The Sales folks have earned my respect, especially
>in trying to sell products that our customers don't want or need,
No wonder we're in so much trouble.
Heather
|
1612.109 | Share the joy/share the pain! | USCTR1::JHERNBERG | | Mon Aug 24 1992 11:54 | 16 |
|
Does this single a change in the DEC philosophy regarding family?
Understanding the necessity for such moves notwithstanding, how
will the powers at be explain such occurances as the infamous $1000.
bar bill that was included in a DEC employee's expense voucher?
(This incident was included in (I believe) in Wall Street Journal or
New York Times last winter as part of article on $13 millon dollars
in questionable expenses that DEC was attempted to track down.)
If the glory of days gone was shared, then the pain of now must also
be shared.
Ahem!
|
1612.110 | | FIGS::BANKS | This was | Mon Aug 24 1992 12:03 | 8 |
| The first problem is that Digital is losing money, hand over fist.
The bigger problem is that Digital doesn't know how to STOP losing money.
They do, however, know how to nickel and dime.
When you're overwhelmed, you do what you know how to do, even when you know
it doesn't make much of a difference.
|
1612.111 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Aug 24 1992 13:51 | 8 |
| re .100:
> I do not think anybody has mentioned the kids. Some children have been
> told already that they were going to Canobie Lake Park, and some of
> these kids are too young to understand why mommy or daddy is breaking
> her or his promise.
There's nary a peep about the cancellation in PARENTING.
|
1612.112 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Aug 24 1992 14:13 | 4 |
| Re: .111
Parenting is not the correct place.
Marc H.
|
1612.113 | | CUPTAY::BAILEY | Season of the Winch | Mon Aug 24 1992 14:43 | 19 |
| RE: Canobie Lake
IMO - a correct decision, given the current economic situation in the
company.
RE: get a job in Sales
Yeah, remind me to tell you about an engineer friend of mine in another
company who tried REAL hard to get a DEC sales person to sell him
equipment for a project he was designing. Only after the project was
in jeopardy of slipping his schedule did he finally contact H-P, who
were only too happy to send a salesman out to see what he needed. That
was 12 years ago, and to this day that engineer will not consider
buying anything from DEC.
IMO - many DEC sales people have a LOT to learn about selling.
... Bob
|
1612.114 | Consistency is the hobgoblin... | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Aug 24 1992 14:51 | 23 |
| The following is from VTX DELTA, dated 24-Jul:
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+TM DIGITAL INTERNAL USE ONLY
|d|i|g|i|t|a|l| YOU MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Employee Appreciation Events
During economic times like the one we are currently in, Digital continues to
examine many avenues in our effort to be more profitable. Many of you have
written to Delta over time to express concern for expenditures in the Employee
Appreciation area. Some think we need to do more and some think we need to do
less! We have again examined our position on special appreciation events like
Canobie Lake and the distribution of Turkeys. These events take a considerable
time to prepare and decisions must be made well in advance of any such event.
Our Executive Committee strongly supports our continued efforts to recognize
and appreciate our employees efforts during these stressful times. They
continue to support these two events taking place. Our need to say thank you
to each employee is even more evident today, than it has ever been in our past.
Appreciation events such as these allow us to take a moment and reflect on
each persons contributions to Digital. Therefore, we will hold our Canobie
Lake Park event and we will distribute turkeys.
|
1612.115 | | COGITO::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Mon Aug 24 1992 14:55 | 5 |
| For those who decide to take their kids to Canobie on their own, I
noticed last night that Purity Supreme has coupons good for $4 off the
admission price, good until 4 September. At least I think it was 4
September.
|
1612.116 | They'd never admit it, but... | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Mon Aug 24 1992 14:56 | 8 |
| My main objection to this cancellation is that this was the only
"family"-oriented event the company offered. For a company that talks a
lot about being family-oriented and speaks highly of family values, it
really does little to back it up.
My kids are very disappointed, but I don't disagree with the
numerous comments about equity for all employees, etc., and I
understand *why* it was done...although I bet they didn't save a heck
of a lot of money by cancelling it at this late date.
|
1612.117 | Family value in recession | RT95::HU | Olympic Game | Mon Aug 24 1992 15:19 | 7 |
|
I'll vote 1992 as "Family Value" year, just like all the Republican
and Democrate campaign we seen so far.
So why DEC need to be different from two party's agenda ?
Michael..
|
1612.118 | The hobgoblins reply . . . | CAPNET::CROWTHER | Maxine 276-8226 | Mon Aug 24 1992 16:47 | 13 |
| re .114
We in the DELTA program apologize for any confusion. The statement
that we have on Canobie Lake and Turkeys is in fact a year old and has
not been updated. We assumed, along with everyone else that when the
announcements started being made that it was "business" as usual.
We are removing the statement today and will replace it with the
Executive Committee posting.
We are trying to find out about turkeys and will post what we find out.
Sorry for the inconsistency.
|
1612.119 | Good bye | USCTR1::JHERNBERG | | Mon Aug 24 1992 16:59 | 19 |
|
Dear Mr. Olsen,
Won't they even wait until your corporate corpse is cold in your
desk chair before they dismember your company?
Thank you for my outings at Canobie Lake; I have no children but
for one afternoon I could feel like one in the wonderful company of my
peers and their childern.
I also want to thank you for the turkeys over the years; besides
providing a wealth of material for jokes (!) my family has greatly
appreciated the fine dinner they have made.
Good bye Mr. Olsen, this company will be the poorer for your
passing.
|
1612.120 | re:.89 Good Ideas | EMDS::MANGAN | | Mon Aug 24 1992 17:05 | 1 |
|
|
1612.121 | | BEING::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Tue Aug 25 1992 00:05 | 21 |
| Re .106:
> Be greatful that you have a job!
Why? Digital employs me because it makes a profit from me, not because
it is doing me a favor. More and more, Digital tells employees that it
does not care about us as people. This is just a business arrangement
to Digital; there's nothing for me to be grateful for. If anything,
Digital should be grateful to us; it is the profits of OUR labor that
Digital's stockholders are receiving a share of.
> To me, I would much rather be in the position of working and being able
> to spend my money and bring my family to Canobie rather than be given a
> package and having to do the same.
Would you rather be in the position of working and going to Canobie or
of being laid off because the decision to cancel Canobie reduced morale
even further and resulted in more losses and more layoffs?
-- edp
|
1612.122 | Ahhhhem! | DELNI::SUMNER | | Tue Aug 25 1992 01:06 | 38 |
| Re .121
> Why? Digital employs me because it makes a profit from me, not because
> it is doing me a favor. More and more, Digital tells employees that it
> does not care about us as people. This is just a business arrangement
> to Digital; there's nothing for me to be grateful for. If anything,
> Digital should be grateful to us; it is the profits of OUR labor that
> Digital's stockholders are receiving a share of.
Excuse me but...
I find your response to be totally offensive. I would love to respond
to every word of your last response but I don't think the MOD's would
leave my response here for very long. In fact, I'm wary of the
longevity of this *very* diluted response.
If I am not mistaken, the point .106 seems to me means "be thankful
you have a job as opposed to being unemployed". It DOES NOT mean you
should be kissing somebody's feet.
Think of the hundereds of millions of people who tonight, went to bed
hungry, that's assuming they even have a bed. There are millions of
people like this in the US who, right this very second are only dreaming
of finding a job so they can buy food for their kids or make sure they
have clothes to keep themselves warm.
If you can not think about those less fortunate and be thankful for
just one minute then I suggest that you rethink your idea of who
needs a re-education on caring for people.
DEC is obviously going through a very difficult time right now but
DEC is not some entity of uncontrolled dark and evil forces. DEC is
made of people like you and I and based on your last response I for
one am thankful that you are not in control of my fate.
Glenn
|
1612.123 | oh, excuse me I'm late for the BOM meeting - must dsah ! | IOSG::WDAVIES | There can only be one ALL-IN-1 Mail | Tue Aug 25 1992 05:40 | 17 |
| Sorry .122
DEC is in the control of Bob Palmer, who is the proxy of the
shareholders and Wall Street. It is not in 'our' control (assuming you
aren't one of Bob's minions...
And wake up and smell the coffee - your great efforts or technological
prowess don't mean diddly squat if your management decide that your
existence is not maximising the shareholders profits (often possibly
erroneously as the pressures of cost cutting have hidden side-effects)
I suggest you r enquire after the fate of a team I had the pleasure of
wokring with, and who engineered the first mail filtering product for
ALL-IN-1, not too mention who designed the first version of ALL-IN-1.
They got it in the neck...
Winton
|
1612.124 | | BEING::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Tue Aug 25 1992 09:20 | 31 |
| Re .122:
> If I am not mistaken, the point .106 seems to me means "be thankful
> you have a job as opposed to being unemployed".
I understood the point, and I disagree with it. Who should I be
thankful to? Not Digital; Digital is not doing me a favor, and it is
not because of Digital that I have a job. I have a job because I am a
good engineer -- the cause of my employment stems from MY skills, not
from Digital's generosity.
Digital ought to get it straight who should be thankful here. I can
find a new employer more easily than Digital can find a new engineer
with my skills. I am doing Digital a favor by working for the company,
and it ought to demonstrate its gratefulness for that. A day at
Canobie is a mere pittance compared to the income we produce for the
company.
> Think of the hundereds of millions of people who tonight, . . .
>
> If you can not think about those less fortunate and be thankful . . .
You are missing my point. I did not say we should not be "thankful" in
general, as in thankful to the random chances that produced the skills
I have. I am saying we need not be grateful to DIGITAL -- it is not
because of any generosity by Digital that we are employed. Digital
employs us just for business reasons, not because it is doing us a
favor. So there's nothing to be grateful for.
-- edp
|
1612.125 | Another $.02 | LJOHUB::NSMITH | rises up with eagle wings | Tue Aug 25 1992 09:26 | 14 |
| We do not need to be grateful to Digital -- but likewise Digital does
not need to be grateful to us -- Digital *pays* us; gratitude is not
necessary. This is strictly an economic deal.
> Digital ought to get it straight who should be thankful here. I can
> find a new employer more easily than Digital can find a new engineer
> with my skills. I am doing Digital a favor by working for the company,
Then, perhaps you shouldn't continue to do Digital such a favor, if
that is the way you view it. Each of us is responsible for our own
career; there is no big-daddy DEC who is responsible. Likewise, none
of us are indispensable to DEC.
Nancy
|
1612.126 | | USCTR1::SMARINO | | Tue Aug 25 1992 09:40 | 5 |
| Re .122
Well said!! In my opinion, the author of .121 will have no trouble
getting a job elsewhere. Great confidence and the world owes that
person something as well as their kids an outing at Canobie.
|
1612.127 | The meat of the matter | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Tue Aug 25 1992 09:47 | 22 |
| Well, I think this is the crux of the matter. Digital used to seem
more like a family than a business. The company treated employees like
family members. No matter how bad things got, they'd stick by us and
keep striving to be better. The employees didn't look at Digital as a
business either.
This is what has changed. In attempting to turn the company around,
it's becoming more and more just a business, focusing on the profit and
loss statement. No more pats on the back and squeezing every penny out
of the business and its employees (like benefit cuts, although that's
not what they're called, but when you take home less money every week,
you get the idea). This may work, but it is a major cultural change and
will obviously piss off a lot of people in the process. It's also a
risky, dangerous game (that Wang played and lost). Alienate and
demotivate enough employees, and everything grinds to a halt.
The people at the top need to understand how it looks from the
bottom...friends being laid off...perhaps your job is next...Being
asked to do more, work harder, take home less, rewards disappearing,
etc. If they really want to turn this company around, they'll need to
motivate the workforce...somehow...and it doesn't have to be financial
reward. They can't expect loyalty to do it anymore. That was the old
Digital "family" and not the new Digital "business." Loyalty won't cut
it anymore. If they squeeze too hard, everyone will leave.
|
1612.128 | Family matters | VFOVAX::FRANKLIN | | Tue Aug 25 1992 10:01 | 10 |
| One problem is that the Digital "family" has been subject to
some serious inbreeding for the last few years. It's sad when
all marketing propaganda is taken at face value (VAX 9000, etc.)
without question, and self-centered attitudes are the norm.
The only solution to correct for these mutated generations is
eradication of undesirable elements and infusion of new blood.
In any way possible.
|
1612.129 | You have no basis for judgement... | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Tue Aug 25 1992 11:01 | 8 |
| Re: .113
Based on a single experience with Digital Sales, told to you second hand
13 years ago, all Digital Sales people are incompetent?
Sorry... that's a bit of a stretch for me.
Bob
|
1612.130 | | FIGS::BANKS | This was | Tue Aug 25 1992 11:46 | 33 |
| Re: .121:
Right on.
Re: .122, and others,
While I'm sensitive to the points you make, I still cannot avoid the issue
that Digital did not hire me to do me a favor. I cannot thank someone
unless they do something worthy of thanks. Digital hired me to achieve
their own ends (that is, out of their own selfish interests), and I
accepted the job to achieve my own ends (that is, out of my own selfish
interests). No thanks has come from Digital to me, and no thanks is
required of me by Digital. I give them work, they give me money, and it's
abundantly clear that this is all Digital wants from the relationship.
I will also note that virtually every time I've heard the phrase "You
should be thankful for...", it has been offered as an excuse to someone who
is suffering some significant pain. That doesn't help the pain. In fact,
all it does is tell the person "You have no right to hurt".
Ok, so a few of us screwed up here. I, at one time, harbored this illusion
that Digital really gave a sh*t about me. I was wrong. So what? The
major source of the pain was my own unrealistic expectations, and getting
over those expectations meant the same thing as getting over the pain.
I can thank my lucky stars that I'm employed, or I can thank my school
teachers, or my parents, or myself (for having the skills). I can thank
the economy (back when I was hired), and thank my bosses for keeping me
when I wasn't producing (of course, the reasons that I wasn't producing
were intimately tied with Digitals apparent indifference).
I cannot find any reason to thank Digital for any of these things.
Digital's just a player, looking to serve its own ends, just as I am.
|
1612.131 | and you have no basis for your conclusions | CUPTAY::BAILEY | Season of the Winch | Tue Aug 25 1992 12:19 | 31 |
| RE: .129
You've got your facts mixed up Bob. This incident wasn't told to me
second hand, nor did I ever say or imply that. I was at the time
working at the company, on the project I mentioned, working very
closely with the engineer involved ... that's about as first-hand as
you can get.
Second, I NEVER said "all Digital Sales people are incompetent" ... YOU
said that. I said "IMO - many Digital Sales people have a LOT to learn
about selling". Obviously, some Digital Sales people have a LOT to
learn about interpreting what they read too.
However, consider this ... due to an inept sales experience, this
company lost out on the sale of perhaps 300-400 PDP-11's over the
lifetime of the product my friend designed. We also lost our
foothold on future generations of the product, which now use Sun
workstations. And we've lost the potential to sell our products to
whatever other company this particular engineer designs process control
products for. That adds up to a lot of $$$ over the years. And the
same attitude that caused the problem 12 years ago in this particular
case still exists today.
Do you care about fixing the problem? Or simply making excuses for how
far you have to "stretch" in order to admit to yourself that it exists?
The answer to that question will go a long way to determining whether
or not this company is going to pull it's own fat out of the fire in
the coming years.
... Bob
|
1612.132 | ?? | CDROM::HENDRICKS | The only way out is through | Tue Aug 25 1992 12:21 | 20 |
| re: many previous...
"Digital" does not have feelings.
Co-workers do.
Managers do.
I imagine the CEO does.
Many co-workers have often appreciated something I did professionally,
or something I developed, or time spent helping them learn something.
They let me know that!
Some managers have appreciated me, verbally, or through a raise.
I'm too far removed from Ken or Bob for their appreciation or lack of
appreciation to be evident.
If some co-workers and some managers appreciate me, I feel
appreciated by "Digital". How else could I feel appreciated by
"Digital" in a company of >100,000 people?
|
1612.133 | Personal Opinion - .02 cents worth | WMOIS::MACK_J | | Tue Aug 25 1992 12:42 | 61 |
| again, IMO Cancellation of the Outing is the 'right' thing to do
given the state of the company and what it is trying to grapple with.
In following this note, I see Sales saying they aren't rewarded while
Manufacturing is, Manufacturing says they aren't while Engineering is,
Engineering says Sales is and they aren't. That smacks of a rathole
that is endless. Without Engineering we develop no products to
manufacture. Without Manufacturing we develop no products to sell.
With no Manufacturing our Sales force has to learn how to move
stoves, refridgerators and autos. We all need each other in order to
keep the Corporation going and afloat.
It also shows the "Turf" issues which Bob Palmer spoke of in his
recent DVN. We, (READ ALL OF DIGITAL) own turning the company around.
Cancelling the outing hurts to be sure. Many people looked forward
to it. Downsizing hurts as well. There are ample notes in this
conference which covers that though. However, when we speak of
Stockholders and accountability to them, I get the feeling that
people view the Stockholders as the great "They" and "Them". Alot
of Stockholders are "US" meaning Digital Employees who buy and own
stock in the company.
My personal philosophy/belief systems around what do I owe Digital
and what does Digital owe me boils out to a series of expectations.
Digital EXPECTS my best efforts in trying to make the company
succeed. I EXPECT Digital's best efforts in the same vein. If I am
expected to do my best by the Corporation, then the expectation in
reverse is that the Corporation will do its best by me.
What I DO NOT expect Digital to do, is concern itself with what I do
on my own time, so long as I do not bring discredit to the corporation
in so doing. Last friday evening, for example, I took my 13 year old
to Fenway Park to a Sox game. Now I walked up to the ticket window
and purchased the Grandstand seats for 10.00. The same price I'd
pay if I bought them through Employee activities. No one at the window
asked to see my badge. So, I do not need Digital to go to Fenway
Park, what a revelation! Why, I bet I can go to Canobie Lake Park
and get in, without showing my badge! Heck I'm willing to wager I
can pick up a Holiday Turkey at any supermarket without having a
coupon OR my badge. Digital doesn't owe me those things, nor do I
expect them to.
Grateful for a job? I have absolutely no reservations about saying
you bet your life I am. Do I feel Digital is perfection personified?
Absolutely not, nor will it ever be, but I feel better about working
for Digital right now then I would if I were sitting in the Lowell
Wang building.
Lastly, I do realize how much everyone looked forward to the outing
for whatever personal reasons they may've had. It is unfortunate that
it was cancelled, however, it was. The largest complaint people have
had in the past is a lack of communications, and let's give a nickles
worth of credit to Management team up above. They cancelled it, they
gave the reasons why, expressed regrets and have committed to finding
other, perhaps even more suitable or appropriate means of showing
gratitude and rewards.
Please read all of the above as simply my own personal opinions.
-J-
|
1612.134 | Good, Grief!!!!!!!!!! | GENRAL::INDERMUEHLE | Stonehenge Alignment Service | Tue Aug 25 1992 12:46 | 9 |
| RE: .130
I agree with Dave.
Digital owes me only one thing in return for the work I produce.
My check. Anything beyond this, I thank Digital for and is a benny.
John I.
|
1612.135 | What Digital owes me: | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:08 | 16 |
| Digital owes me a number of things in return
for the work I do: Salary, pension, health insurance, vacation, etc.
They owe me these things because that is what we have agreed to.
If Digital wants to change what they offer me in return for my
work, they do so because it is in Digital's best interest to do so,
and often, because it is in our mutual interest.
And if I don't like what they are offering, I am free to seek
my best price elsewhere.
But Digital does owe me what they've promised me, nothing more,
nothing less.
Tom_K
|
1612.136 | | SASE::FAVORS::BADGER | One Happy camper ;-) | Tue Aug 25 1992 13:27 | 21 |
|
I thought of the outting more for my wife and children than for me.
One way to repay the kids for the times I've worked late and couldn't
be with them. Or for the business trip when I've missed a school
function.
So I'll take some of that cold green stuff I earn each week and buy
them tickets to canobie this year since *I* already promised that we'd
be going [silly fool]. Of course there won't be any Digital banners,
but I can remind them on each ride that they can be thankful that Daddy
has a job so he could buy the tickets.
I did kinda enjoy meeting families of others I work with while at the
park.
I wish Digital good luck. I also wish that Digital didn't loose their
creative people. A creative person might have saved this year's
outting by collecting $5 or $10 bucks each person at the gate and still
have held the event. I'd have paid. Next time I may have to go to
that school function instead of working that night. And the only news
sight of Digital will be what the kids read in the press.
ed
|
1612.137 | What a nice idea...! | LJOHUB::NSMITH | rises up with eagle wings | Tue Aug 25 1992 14:43 | 4 |
| Why not suggest that others from DEC who want to go to Canobie Lake
try to all go on the same date? No need to lose the fun and
friendship!
|
1612.138 | | RDVAX::COLLIER | Bruce Collier | Tue Aug 25 1992 15:27 | 11 |
| .124 > I am doing Digital a favor by working for the company, and it
.124 > ought to demonstrate its gratefulness for that. A day at
.124 > Canobie is a mere pittance compared to the income we produce for the
.124 > company. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
Let's see, a $1.8 billion loss in FY92 comes out to an average loss of
about $18,000 per employee. Given the profitability of the Ultrix
business, it would be hard to argue that you, Eric, did the opposite
of that. Should you and other employees each offer to stockholders the
equivalent of $18,000 in free Canobie rides, so that everything comes
out even?
|
1612.139 | no griping! | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, ISV Tech. Support | Tue Aug 25 1992 15:58 | 2 |
| the replies to this topic are beginning to stink. How about some
constructiveness?
|
1612.140 | Take the first step for us | SDSVAX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney in New York | Tue Aug 25 1992 18:05 | 8 |
| Mark,
Tell us what makes you feel that the corporation is trusting you,
encouraging you and rewarding you, such that your loyalty to the
corporation goes beyond your stipulated salary and benefits?
Tell us what you believe the plan is to restore Digital to profitable
growth?
|
1612.141 | restate earnings | YNGSTR::BROWN | | Tue Aug 25 1992 18:16 | 5 |
| re: Last quarter's performance:
$18,000 loss per employee *is* rather dismal sounding. Look at in terms
of seconds worked in the quarter (1.8m/(62 days*8hrs/day*3600sec/hr))
and it comes out to just $1000 per second; a much lower number. ;-)
|
1612.142 | | SYSTEM::COCKBURN | Craig Cockburn | Tue Aug 25 1992 20:37 | 20 |
| > <<< Note 1612.137 by LJOHUB::NSMITH "rises up with eagle wings" >>>
> -< What a nice idea...! >-
> Why not suggest that others from DEC who want to go to Canobie Lake
> try to all go on the same date? No need to lose the fun and
> friendship!
There are places like Canonbie Lake in the UK, but the company here has
never put on a free trip there for employees, never mind a regular event.
in the UK, we have to _PAY_ to go to such places. Maybe you folks from
New England could try doing this and see how you get on, rather than
expecting a free ride from the company.
What about keeping Canonbie lake as an employee day, but asking people to
pay?
I wouldn't mind a free day at a fun park, but I'd rather have a job.
Craig
|
1612.143 | | SYSTEM::COCKBURN | Craig Cockburn | Tue Aug 25 1992 20:49 | 25 |
| > <<< Note 1612.140 by SDSVAX::SWEENEY "Patrick Sweeney in New York" >>>
> -< Take the first step for us >-
> Tell us what you believe the plan is to restore Digital to profitable
> growth?
Implement the "small company" mentality in the organisation. It's amazing
to see small companies which have _no_ personnel department for instance, little
or no beaurocacy, paper shufflers, empire builders or lack of direction.
They're fast moving, motivated, have strategy and direction and don't
seem to be run by Civil Servants.
If DEC could operate like a small company, then maybe things would be a bit
better.
Even notesfiles, which have great potential for changing this company
for the good, are really not touching their full potential due to:
- Notes not being developed fully, compare Lotus Notes for instance
- Notes not being recongised as an offical channel for doing anything
- Management pretending notes doesn't exist, or is a nasty problem
which might go away if they bury their heads in the sand.
- Topics being ratholed and people talking about frivolities,
and trivial side issues.
Craig
|
1612.144 | | WMOIS::RAINVILLE | | Wed Aug 26 1992 01:31 | 4 |
| I wouldn't mind paying my share of the cost to have a day out
with colleages and their children. But at this late date, it is
going to be hard to explain why i continue to work for someone
who can't plan ahead...mwr
|
1612.145 | | DELNI::SUMNER | | Wed Aug 26 1992 02:55 | 16 |
| Re: Replies to my reply.
Ya know, I just wrote a 77 line reply responding to all those neat
little comments you all made. I entered it, then deleted it after
it occured to me that either (a) those making the replies are too
emotional to carry on a constructive discussion and/or (b) you all are
attempting to provoke me into a defensive situation that simply raises
your own sense of self worth.
I'm sure those truly interested in Canobie Lake topic don't want this
note "rat holed" so I won't perpetuate the ego_building_trips...
I also hate to see Canobie Lake go but life goes on...
Glenn
|
1612.146 | Looked fine to me | CSC32::MORTON | Aliens, the snack food of CHAMPIONS! | Wed Aug 26 1992 03:25 | 5 |
| Re .145
Actually Glenn, I read it and thought it was a fine note. It
didn't seem defensive to me.
Jim Morton
|
1612.147 | Who owes who? | TRUCKS::QUANTRILL_C | | Wed Aug 26 1992 07:46 | 27 |
| One of the things which annoyed me when I first came to Digital
and met the culture shock, was the attitude of a number of employees who
complained about conditions and the amount of workspace they had and the
state of the canteen etc.... I was even told "Once you're in Digital you
have a job for life - you practically have to commit fraud or arson to
be chucked out"
In the past I have worked in freezing cold portacabins, with a
kettle. OK my choice, but if you want to start complaining that Digital
OWES you something just look at how much you get and don't even consider.
You are employed to do a job. You agree to do it and receive an
agreed remuneration and benefits package in return. You have a right to
expect a certain level of good working conditins as laid down by the
legislation of the country you work for.
I know Digital keeps me because they want my skills. I have no
illusions but that I will go if they no longer need those skills no
matter how brilliant I may be. Hard luck to me for being in the wrong
place at the wrong time, but while I am here, I owe Digital what I
promised to deliver and they owe me what they promised. Nothing more or
less. OK Digital sometimes gives me an added benefit - Marks &
Spencer's vouchers at Christmas, I sometimes get in early and give
Digital an extra hour or so a day.... Don't start telling me I have to
do that extra hour EVERY day because I sometimes chose to!!!
Cathy
|
1612.148 | | TPSYS::BUTCHART | TNSG/Software Performance | Wed Aug 26 1992 09:03 | 12 |
| re: Beyond pay
Interesting to contrast the arguments that neither Digital nor its
employees owe each other anything beyond direct economic obligations
with the articles I read in various business publications about really
successful, dynamic companies - which do everything they can to engage
the loyalty of their employees beyond "mere pay". They also attempt
to make sure that at least some of the rewards of loyalty and
enthusiastic (as opposed to dutiful) participation flow back to their
employees.
/Butch
|
1612.149 | | IOSG::WDAVIES | There can only be one ALL-IN-1 Mail | Wed Aug 26 1992 09:42 | 23 |
| re -.1
The point is that many people believed (in good faith), that there
was a 'Special relationship' in DEC - that we weren't mere wage slaves,
but part of a familiy that shared in the rewards - typified by 100%
reinvestment of profits.
Now that has changed, and the reaction has been one of two things :-
a) We are now wage slaves, and the Special relationship is no more,
and that its look after number one time.
b) That we should still honour our part of the special relationship,
even if Digital is chucked in its half, because we 'owe' it to the
Company (because we are lucky to have a job), or sometimes with
a more calculating position, that working your butt off, will ensure
your personal survival (through the survival of DEC).
Both are reasonable moral positions to take - I'll leave it for you to
decide which is preferable /intelligent.
Winton
|
1612.150 | | BEING::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:13 | 29 |
| Re .138:
> Let's see, a $1.8 billion loss in FY92 comes out to an average loss of
> about $18,000 per employee.
First, most of the "loss" was a "restructuring charge" -- money that is
going to go to the employees who are being laid off. That's not money
the rest of us have cost the corporation. And that's real cute;
laid-off non-productive employees get several months' pay, but retained
productive employees get a canceled invitation worth less than $20.
Wow, this company's values really make sense.
Second, it is employees who produce revenue. Digital clearly could not
operate without employees. If the company is not making a profit from
our revenue, it is because Digital is not using what we produce to full
advantage.
> Given the profitability of the Ultrix business, it would be hard to
> argue that you, Eric, did the opposite of that.
No, it would not be hard at all. There are two Ultrix groups. The
former UEG group accumulated an enormous backlog of problem reports for
the Berkeley-derived Ultrix and is now working on Ultrix/OSF. The
former RSX group has taken over the Berkeley-derived Ultrix and has
reduced the backlog substantially. (Prior to that, the RSX group had
reduced its SPRs to zero and kept them there.)
-- edp
|
1612.151 | like <> support | CDROM::HENDRICKS | The only way out is through | Wed Aug 26 1992 10:24 | 18 |
| We all know that DEC is in crisis mode. If we had personal financial
crises that were proportionally equivalent to the one DEC is in,
wouldn't most of us choose to cut out the non-essentials for a while?
Even if it were painful for family members, wouldn't most readers put
long-term financial survival ahead of short-term pleasures if they were
the decision-maker?
I will support almost anything that can help this company grow and
prosper again. Bob Palmer is probably going to have to make a lot more
unpopular decisions before he manages to turn the company around. It
would be easy to criticize some of the ones I don't like, but I don't
have all the data he has. I'm glad I'm not sitting in his chair, and I
don't think I'm more qualified for the job than he is, so I'm willing
to try to live with what he decides.
If I had kids, this is a decision that I wouldn't *like*, but that I would
*support*.
|
1612.152 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Wed Aug 26 1992 11:06 | 29 |
| re .148
> really successful, dynamic companies - which do everything they can
> to engage the loyalty of their employees beyond "mere pay". They
> also attempt to make sure that at least some of the rewards of
> loyalty and enthusiastic (as opposed to dutiful) participation flow
> back to their employees.
Note that this is a feedback loop:
+--> Loyal employees --> Profitable business --+
| |
+---Money to reward employees for loyalty <----+
We've hit a discontinuity that has broken this loop. I fear it will
be (is being) replaced with the following feedback system:
+--> Disheartened employees --> Unprofitable business --+
| |
+---Less money to reward employees <--------------------+
One of the biggest challenges for Bob Palmer is to ensure that
the lower cycle is not established, and to see that the former
cycle is restored.
Tom_K
|
1612.153 | | BEING::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Wed Aug 26 1992 11:18 | 18 |
| Re .136:
> A creative person might have saved this year's outting by collecting
> $5 or $10 bucks each person at the gate and still have held the event.
I called Canobie Lake Park on Friday, when it was still a rumor. I
spoke to one person who transferred me to the group sales department
who transferred me to somebody else who suggested that I wait until the
rumor was confirmed and call back when I had "permission" to go ahead.
I called again yesterday. Nobody was available from the group sales
department, so I left my name and number. They have not called back.
Apparently Canobie Lake Park is not interested in making up any of the
hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue they have lost.
-- edp
|
1612.154 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Wed Aug 26 1992 12:06 | 78 |
| I too am sorry to see Canobie cancelled, but given our last
quarter I understand that this company needs to be run very
differently.
All change is painful and this is a big change for this company.
If you read the string of notes the pain of this cancellation seems to
be felt for different reasons by different people. For me its felt for
the children of the employees who look foward to going to Canobie for a
day of fun. I can't honestly say I looked foward to going to Canobie
and the only time I have ever attended is when I was required to work
the gate.
I don't really want to get into a contest with folks in here about
how bad big brother Digital is to its employees. Overall, I like
working here and I do feel I owe the company, not for having a job or
because of the "added benefits" (and there are a lot), but because of
the fact that I do work here - I am loyal to the place I choose
to work at and the people I choose to work for.
My feeling is that we haven't saved the company by cancelling
Canobie, but I am sure that wasn't the objective. My feeling is that
this move is a perception thing. Cuts need to be made everywhere and
this is just another area that could be cut (remember it wasn't just
Canobie it is outings world wide). I don't think any of know the actual
dollar figure that could be placed on outings world wide, but seeing
what takes place in the U.S. alone I could guess that the savings are
significant. For folks who think this is not a perception thing, or that
with a 2 billion dollar loss we don't need a perception thing to make
folks realize the situation Digital is in - go back and read this string
of notes. Many of our fellow workers still don't realize. The notes that
prompted me to write this were "Digital does nothing for us and it
isn't a family company any more" and "we must really be in trouble if
we are cancelling Canobie".
As far as what Digital "owes" its employees? How many of the
following fall under that category? How many of the following and how much
of the following should have gone before Canobie?
* Your Salary
* Medical assistance
* Dental assistance
* STD
* LTD
* Basic Life Ins.
* Paid Holidays
* Vacation
* Adoption Benefit
* Child Care Resource and Referal
* EAP
* Health Services
* Purchase Program
* Credit Union
* Metpay
* Educational Assistance
* Matching Gift Program
* U.S. Savings Bonds
* Opt Out Choice (medical)
* Tax exempt reimbursment accounts
* Optional Life
* SAVE
* Pension
* Stock
* Retiree Benefits
* Student Loan program
* Relocation
* Ongoing Employee Activities events
I'm sure others could list more "benefits" provided by the company
(both required and not). I know most sites "do their own thing" in the
area of seminars and employee activities and some sites do more than
others. I understand people being upset, I understand people feeling
sorry, but I don't understand people who choose to work for a company
that look to bash any and all decisions just for the sake of bashing.
I'm one who feels that the company gives more than it owes to employees
and employees owe it to themselfs to take advantage of the programs in
place to make themselfs more useful and marketable both internal and
external to Digital.
John
|
1612.155 | ?????????? | ANGLIN::NEIMAN | Virgil Neiman @MPO D442-2165 | Wed Aug 26 1992 12:15 | 16 |
| I've been with DEC for 5 years and I guess that I didn't know just how
much we have been missing here in fly-over land (Minneapolis, MN). We
have never been given annual:
1. Trips to some place like Lake Canobie.
2. Turkeys at holiday time.
3. Gift vouchers for Marks and Spencer's (Whatever that is!).
Are these bennies that are only given to certain geographys for some
reason that is not clear to me? Will someone please explain to me why
this policy of distributing perks has not been instituted company-wide.
I can certainly understand why this program has been cut back or
eliminated. I just wish that I would have had the opportunity to enjoy
them when times were good along with the rest of you.
Virgil
|
1612.156 | From the field... | GLDOA::PENFROY | Just Do It or Just Say No? | Wed Aug 26 1992 12:36 | 12 |
|
> Are these bennies that are only given to certain geographys for some
> reason that is not clear to me? Will someone please explain to me why
> this policy of distributing perks has not been instituted company-wide.
YES, I WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER TO THIS AS WELL!!!!!!
What do you want to bet that this topic will be totally ignored
by our self centered "New England" brothers?
--- Paul
|
1612.157 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Wed Aug 26 1992 12:55 | 10 |
| re .155/.156 Canobie is an event that most employees in the U.S.
northeast can take part in. The others I'm not sure about.
Does your group/site do anything in the area of employee appreciation
events? I know most sites/regions do one thing or another. If we could
get an idea of all the events that take place maybe we could get an
idea of what "cancelling outings worldwide" really means.
A couple of things I forgot on my list in .154 were awards dinners,
award gifts and anniversary certificates (thanks to the folks who sent
me mail to remind me I forgot those).
|
1612.158 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:02 | 23 |
| also re: .155 and .156
I'm in New England. I'm not going to ignore you. I don't know the answer.
I always assumed that other geographies had equivalent activities to
Canobie, since no folks from other parts of the country had "days" at
Canobie.
I always assumed that other geographies got turkeys or the equivalent.
Apparently from reading this conference over the last couple of years,
that isn't the case.
I'm sorry you haven't or hadn't been getting what we here in New
England get.
For what it's worth, I went to Canobie once in the previous 12 years
I've worked with the company. I turned over all but 2 or 3 of the
turkeys to charity. I won't miss these awards either way. Even as a
purely symbolic gesture, cancelling Canobie and discontinuing turkeys
(if that in fact happens) was to me the right thing to do.
John
|
1612.159 | | CSC32::B_GRUBBS | | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:04 | 25 |
|
re: -.155
you didn't miss much........Canobie Lake is at best a third rate
amusment park (only one semi-decent short roller coaster). I'm
an amusment park fan and slightly picky. 8^)
The turkeys are fine, but I always preferred to buy smoked turkey
for the Holidays, anyway.
When I worked in Maynard I always wondered if EVERYONE was getting
turkeys or just NEw England. Now I know they weren't. Also
a good portion of those turkeys ended up donated to needy families by
marking the card and turning it in so it was half charity in an odd sort
of way. Not that it makes it more 'equtable' to the rest of the
company.
I'm suprised knowone mentioned the New England Helicopter service. No
charge to employees or customers travelling on business. Sort of a
benny, when you consider how many companies have their OWN helicopter
fleet complete with airport terminal, pilots, helipads, etc.....Surely
the van services cost less at $30 bucks a ride than a Belljet from
Maynard to Logan at 1500 feet with three passengers aboard??
|
1612.160 | Is Albuquerque Exempt??? | ELMAGO::JPALLONE | | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:05 | 6 |
|
I'm not trying to rub salt into a wound, but Albuquerque, had it's
Family Day at Cliff's Amusement Park, we also had our Employee
Appreciation Day and luncheon for the employees who SERPed out of
Digital, we didn't get our usual gifts (towel, tote bag, etc).
Maybe we are different companies.....
|
1612.161 | All water under the bridge for now... | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts is TOO slow | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:12 | 9 |
| Here in Dallas, we tend to have some sort of Summer and Winter
activity. In the summer it usually is Six Flags. In the winter it is
usually some sort of theme dinner/party.
The one thing that has always bothered me is knowing that 10's of
thousands of people in New England got into their events free while our
several hundred people always had to pay $10 or $15/person for ours.
Bob
|
1612.162 | | MSBCS::CONNELL | Level 5 and counting... | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:27 | 11 |
| � <<< Note 1612.156 by GLDOA::PENFROY "Just Do It or Just Say No?" >>>
� What do you want to bet that this topic will be totally ignored
� by our self centered "New England" brothers?
That is a needlessly cruel and cutting remark that I will not ignore.
Just because your local management has not seen fit to do something
nice for you, don't begrudge us that fact that ours has. What does
falsely labeling us "self centered" gain you?
You lose the bet. --Mike
|
1612.163 | | GLDOA::JWYSOCKI | It Wasn't Me! | Wed Aug 26 1992 13:53 | 14 |
|
I have to echo Virgil's sentiments. I work in Metro Detroit, and I have
never received a turkey, or gift vouchers,. There have been a couple of
outings, but I can't recall (since I did not attend) whether or not
Digital paid for them.
Although my group has been told that we are not going to be impacted by
the cuts, the pressure is definitley on to over-produce, and generate
revenue for the company. I am of the previously-mentioned mindset that
Digital "owes" me the salary that I earn for the job that I do. Nothing
more, nothing less, the rest of the "warm fuzzies" are not owed but
have been around so long as to be expected.....
John
|
1612.164 | | GLDOA::PENFROY | Just Do It or Just Say No? | Wed Aug 26 1992 14:05 | 15 |
|
> That is a needlessly cruel and cutting remark that I will not ignore.
>
> Just because your local management has not seen fit to do something
> nice for you, don't begrudge us that fact that ours has. What does
> falsely labeling us "self centered" gain you?
Sorry you took it so hard. One thing I have learned about Notes, if you
want a topic to gain visibility, you have to be somewhat
confrontational.
So, I lost the bet but gained the desired result.
--- Paul
|
1612.165 | | MSBCS::CONNELL | Level 5 and counting... | Wed Aug 26 1992 14:35 | 12 |
| � <<< Note 1612.164 by GLDOA::PENFROY "Just Do It or Just Say No?" >>>
� Sorry you took it so hard. One thing I have learned about Notes, if you
� want a topic to gain visibility, you have to be somewhat
� confrontational.
Bull.
� So, I lost the bet but gained the desired result.
Oh, I see, insulting _me_ gains the attention of _your_ management.
Eye-yi-yi. --Mike
|
1612.166 | | BEING::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Wed Aug 26 1992 14:41 | 21 |
| Re .151:
> Even if it were painful for family members, wouldn't most readers put
> long-term financial survival ahead of short-term pleasures if they were
> the decision-maker?
Digital is not a human being. It does not experience "pleasures". I
have pointed out elsewhere how Digital ignores the long-term effects of
its short-term decisions. An employee outing at Canobie is a
short-term cost with a long-term payoff -- morale. By paying for
employee outings at Canobie, Digital is not buying itself "pleasures";
it is investing in its employees. By failing to invest in us, Digital
tells us it does not think we are worthwhile or will produce anything
to return their investment.
But even if we do use your analogy, a person going through bankruptcy
is not expected to live a life entirely devoid of pleasures. Certainly
they are allowed more than .1% of their income for entertainment.
-- edp
|
1612.167 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:21 | 10 |
| And to GLDOA::PENFROY, you got our attention. So what? What if
anything do you expect us to do about it?
As I said, I rarely partake in these pleasures. I don't really care
that they're gone. I don't have the power to do anything about it.
Most of us reading the conference don't either.
My attitude is complain to someone who cares.
John
|
1612.168 | call to action | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, ISV Tech. Support | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:40 | 16 |
| Patrick,
I guess we don't share the same values. I read notes from lots of
people that seem (in my opinion) to be equating their worth to the job
that they do and the compensation that they receive from the Company.
I don't. As a result, when the Company changes their compensation, I
don't react like others, "Digital ... does not think we are
worthwhile". Boo, hoo.
I didn't take this job because it paid the most. I honestly felt that
DEC was the best opportunity for me to learn new stuff in the computer
industry. That was twelve years ago, and DEC had recently introduced
the VAX. Today, we are poised to introduce Alpha. There's plenty to
do, and this time I'm on the team that's gonna do it.
You are too.
|
1612.169 | | GLDOA::PENFROY | Just Do It or Just Say No? | Wed Aug 26 1992 15:42 | 14 |
|
> And to GLDOA::PENFROY, you got our attention. So what? What if
> anything do you expect us to do about it?
I don't expect you to do anything about it. I was simply trying to raise
awareness of the fact that there are INEQUITIES in benefits between
corporate and the field. That's all.
It's annoying to sit out here in the field and listen to people cry-baby
about the loss of a benefit (Canobie Lake, etc) that we never had the
opportunity to enjoy.
--- Paul
|
1612.170 | | FIGS::BANKS | This was | Wed Aug 26 1992 16:49 | 19 |
| I suppose a lot of it comes down to a few questions:
1. Is Digital interested in good employee morale right now? Perhaps not,
because it's one way to trim with workforce without so many of those pesky
restructuring charges. And, quite valid at that. Or, it could be interested
in morale. I don't know.
2. Can you buy morale? I don't know.
3. Can Digital afford morale? In the long term, it'd have to, but as usual,
we are talking about the short term here.
4. Is more morale "bought" by having this outing, or by cancelling it? Clearly,
there are strong points to be made on both sides. Either buy a relatively
cheap warm fuzzy for a bunch of people, or do a public display of cutting
waste. Both will rub a subset of people the right way.
One thing's for certain, though, and that's whether or not morale can be
bought, it can most certainly be squandered.
|
1612.171 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Wed Aug 26 1992 17:00 | 39 |
| RE: .154 by JSANTOS
>As far as what Digital "owes" its employees? How many of the following
>fall under that category? How many of the following and how much of
>the following should have gone before Canobie?
Some of what you described as benefits have little to do with
Digital's compensation to us as workers. Let's take a look at the
list, shall we?
[relatively unchanged] * Your Salary
[costs us more] * Medical assistance
[costs us more] * Dental assistance
[costs us more] * STD
[costs us more] * LTD
[costs us more] * Basic Life Ins.
[whoopee!] * Paid Holidays
[TWO weeks?!] * Vacation
[of limited use] * Adoption Benefit
[of limited use] * Child Care Resource and Referal
[I bet they're busy] * EAP
[gone from some sites] * Health Services
[won't even take a call] * Purchase Program
[separate, remember?] * Credit Union
[this a benefit?] * Metpay
* Educational Assistance
[I appreciate this a lot] * Matching Gift Program
[not a benefit at all] * U.S. Savings Bonds
* Opt Out Choice (medical)
* Tax exempt reimbursment accounts
[DEC pays $ on this?] * Optional Life
* SAVE
[if you're vested] * Pension
[wish now I'd sold] * Stock
[different from pension?] * Retiree Benefits
[educational assistance?] * Student Loan program
[fat chance] * Relocation
[paid for by EAC sales] * Ongoing Employee Activities events
|
1612.172 | | FIGS::BANKS | This was | Wed Aug 26 1992 17:04 | 5 |
| In other words, between the increases in "employee contributions to the benefits
package", inflation, and the 15-18 month pay raise cycle that (the lucky?)
people are on, many of us have been seeing a steady, albeit slight, reduction
in our compensation over the last few years. Your mileage may vary, and will
vary considerably if you have a company car, I s'pose.
|
1612.173 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Wed Aug 26 1992 17:17 | 10 |
| re .154
> I can't honestly say I looked foward to going to Canobie
> and the only time I have ever attended is when I was required to work
> the gate.
I seem to recall being told that those working at CLP were
volunteers. Was this really not the case?
Tom_K
|
1612.174 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Aug 26 1992 17:17 | 7 |
| So which results in higher morale, Canobie Lake or the cancellation of
Canobie Lake? People outside MA/NH probably like the idea of the
cancellation since it brings them closer to equity with MA/NH folks.
A lot of people in MA/NH like the idea of cutting back on a frill.
Cancelling Canobie Lake has been a very popular DELTA suggestion,
and I doubt if it's the people outside of MA/NH who were making it
(most had probably never heard of it).
|
1612.175 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Wed Aug 26 1992 18:10 | 58 |
| re. 171 All that I described fall under our compensation plan at DEC.
Are you going to finish your note and compare every bullet to what
other companies are doing? That note was in response to notes that said
you took Canobie away and that was the last thing the company offered
us as employees. But, what the heck lets look at them again and please
remember we are talking company wide.
* Your Salary (relatively unchanged) - To who? You? How much do you
think the company gave in increases over the past year? Millions?
* Medical assistance
* Dental assistance (costs us more) - who is us? If the company has to
pay in the area of $600 million per year by 1995 how much of that
$600 million should be passed on to the employee? Do you think
medical and dental costs have gone down?
* STD - costs you nothing
* LTD - if you get the 50% coverage its totally company paid
* Basic Life Ins - no charge
* Optional Life Ins - costs are the same and you can sign up for it
(during an open enrollment) with no limitations.
* Paid Holidays - no change
* Vacation (2 weeks) - I've been here 14 years I get 4 weeks - how long
have you been here?
* Adoption Benefit (of limited use) - maybe to you. Do you know if this
benefit costs more than Canobie?
* Child Care resource (of limited use) - see previous
* EAP (i'll bet they are busy) - So, if they are busy it means bringing
more people on to cover, therefore the company has an additional expense.
* Health Services (gone from some sites) - some sites still have them.
* Purchase Program (won't even take a call) - If you know that for sure
do something about it.
* Credit Union (separate, remember) - Thats right, and being a seperate
company Digital offers them space to allow a benefit to employees.
* Metpay (thats a benefit?) see credit union
* Matching Gifts (I appreciate this one a lot) - Did you mis-write????
* US Savings Bonds (not a benefit at all) - Oh really? You can elect to
purchase through payroll deductions so I would guess that Digital is
picking up administration costs.
* Optional Life (DEC pays money on this?) - You may purchase at group
rates, also see US Savings Bonds.
* Pension (if your vested?) Are you vested? "Most" employees are.
* Retiree Benefits (different from Pension?) - Yes.
* Student Loan Program (different from educational assistance?) - Yes.
* Relocation (fat chance) - I suggest you count the jobs on VTX that
have this benefit.
* Ongoing Employee Activities events (paid for by EAC sales) Guess
again. I would guess that EAC sales cover about 1/100th of this
expense.
You didn't comment on the biggies (Educational assistance, SAVE,
Opt Out, Tax exempt accounts).
I really didn't want to get into a contest here. If you take
advantage of what is offered thats fine. If you don't want to take
advantage thats fine too. If all these things we mentioned have little
or no value to you why the heck do you have a problem with the
cancellation of Canobie?
|
1612.176 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Wed Aug 26 1992 18:13 | 2 |
| re. 173 Outing workers were volunteers outing managers were not.
I was an outing manager.
|
1612.177 | Canobie was the company picnic | RIPPLE::NORDLAND_GE | Waiting for Perot :^) | Wed Aug 26 1992 22:29 | 23 |
|
Hey all you people in the field: Canobie Lake is really a small,
almost dumpy place. Far from anything you might have had in your mind
(don't _even_ say that Dis* word). It started to pick up a little the
last few years but it definitely doesn't deserve a big sign on the
freeway.
So what's the deal?? For most people this WAS the company picnic!
The company hired Tobin to cater a neat picnic (and probably more
expensive than the park). We sat around talking and chewing sweet corn
while the monsters went on the rides. It was like your family reunion.
The _idea_ that we can't have a company picnic seems more upsetting
than all the discussion about benefits or any savings.
What if your family stopped having reunions (maybe they already did)?
People would probably be upset for a while then get on with their lives -
but they also wouldn't get in touch as often. They would feel less
connected as a part of a larger group. And soon there would be no real
discussion about whether or not to have one since they no longer felt like
'family'.
Could happen to a company too, couldn't it?
JN
|
1612.178 | | RTL::LINDQUIST | | Wed Aug 26 1992 23:30 | 27 |
| �� * Credit Union (separate, remember) - Thats right, and being a seperate
�� company Digital offers them space to allow a benefit to employees.
If you could refrain from describing the credit union as a
benefit, I'd appreciate it.
The DCU is staffed by rude, incompetent people offering an
uncompetative product. If digital wanted to better utilize
the space, they could allow local banks to bid a banking
service package for employees, in exchange for the privelege
of using digital space. This would not be without precedent,
as there is a branch of Barclay's bank in REO.
As far as I can tell, the DCU exists to provide customers for
the employee assistance program. At least that's what I feel
like after visting them. Perhaps digital could offer site
dogs for kicking?
If I get any more benefits like the DCU, I'll be checking out
the long term disability insurance.
...and now back to canobie lake, which as far as I can tell
infuriates both the people who don't go, and the people who
do. Or, maybe they do like the food, and they're just
teasin'!
- Lee Lindquist
|
1612.179 | maybe the dark is from your eyes ... | CUPTAY::BAILEY | Season of the Winch | Thu Aug 27 1992 09:23 | 43 |
| Well, you certainly can't please some of the people any of the time.
Lee, I see the DCU as a benefit ... one I make frequent use of. I've
never experienced the rude, incompetent people you speak of. Quite
the opposite ... I'd rather do business there than with some of the
local banks in the area. I don't know where you work, but I've done
business with DCU branches in Marlboro, Shrewsbury, and Littleton, and
never run into the kind of problems you seem to have with them.
As for Canobie Lake, the company can't win no matter what they do.
If they kept the program, people would complain about how the company
spends money on programs like this while people lose their jobs. Since
they cancelled it, well, people always need something to complain
about. So Lee, let's say they did keep it. Would you be willing to
volunteer to be TFSO'ed, along with a few other folks, to pay for it?
I'll bet not. You can't have it both ways. We need to find ways to
cut discretionary spending, and this is one of the more sensible
decisions I've seen recently in that regard (IMO, of course).
John Santos, you neglected to mention another benefit which, in my
experience, is unique to Digital ... namely these Notes conferences,
where people can spend company time and resources whining and moaning
about how unfair the company is treating them.
Seems like the same old story here ... everybody knows the company's in
trouble, but everybody wants someone else to 'fess up to owning the
problem. Sure, cut programs ... just make sure they don't affect ME.
That's the kind of horse-hockey mentality that got us to this point.
Nearly everyone in this company knew we were heading for economic
problems 3 or 4 years ago, but nobody wanted to be the one to make the
changes required to prevent it from happening. Now we all have to bite
the bullet, and no matter what the company does, somebody's not going
to like it.
Personally, I think the employees who are angered by the decision to
cut this program are in a minority in the company, and that this is one
of the better ways to cut spending without affecting people's ability
to pay their bills and feed their families. Instead of moaning about
it, I think people should encourage the company to take more steps like
this one, that'll mean a small sacrifice for a segment of the company
rather than a large sacrifice for selected individuals.
... Bob
|
1612.180 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Thu Aug 27 1992 09:28 | 16 |
| re.178 It seems my experience and yours are very different.
> Perhaps Digital could offer site dogs for kicking.
Isn't that what Personnel is here for?
> If I get any more benefits like the DCU, I'll be checking out the
> long term disability insurance.
Why the heck would the DCU bother you so much? Just avoid it if
you feel that way. Like most benefits, its there if you want it.
> ...and now back to Canobie Lake, which as far as I can tell
> infuriates both the people who don't go, and the people who do
I think you were being sarcastic, but I think your right on with this
one.
So, I guess your answer to my question is that you would
get rid of the Credit Unions before Canobie. You might be out voted
on this one...
|
1612.181 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 297-2623 | Thu Aug 27 1992 09:32 | 6 |
| re: .169
Thank you for raising our awareness about the inequities. There are
inequities everywhere. Whoever said life was fair?
John
|
1612.182 | | GLDOA::PENFROY | Just Do It or Just Say No? | Thu Aug 27 1992 09:57 | 10 |
|
> Thank you for raising our awareness about the inequities. There are
> inequities everywhere. Whoever said life was fair?
Gee John, you're right! Life is not fair. I'm sorry for bringing up the
issue of inequities at DEC. Silly me. I should have just ignored the
whole situation. Will you forgive me?
--- Paul
|
1612.183 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Thu Aug 27 1992 10:43 | 20 |
| re .178
Lee, I see from ELF that you are in ZKO. I've never experienced
the ZKO DEFCU staff to be anything but polite and professional.
And that includes my experience during a "disagreement" regarding
the last Board election. Speaking of which, the DEFCU now has
a completely new Board of Directors, and is making steady improvement.
If you left a few years ago in disgust (and few would blame you),
take another look. Not perfect, but getting better.
re .180
> Just avoid it if you feel that way. Like most benefits, its there
> if you want it.
Wrong. A benefit that one doesn't use is no benefit. Those who
design our compensation and benefits package need to learn this.
Tom_K
|
1612.184 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Thu Aug 27 1992 10:57 | 6 |
| re.183 All benefits are not used by everyone, but this does not negate
the fact that they are still "benefits" offered by the company.
Given your last statement about people that design benefits,
what benefits, IYO, should be done away with?
|
1612.185 | Seem to have sidetracked | WMOIS::MACK_J | | Thu Aug 27 1992 10:58 | 28 |
| Hey folks - the topic under discussion here was/is the cancellation
of the Canobie Lake outing, not a general benefits discussion which
it's developing into. A considerable number of responses have indicated
that some would've been willing to pay some sort of payment to continue
the event. Perhaps in the need to make a decision surrounding whether
to cancel or not, that option wasn't looked into. Someone mentioned
that cancelling was a topic in DELTA IDEAS that seemed to be being
well received. Again, I think some credit should be given to the
fact that it was cancelled, and communications around the reasoning
was sent out. This is far better than "WE CANCELLED IT PERIOD".
Granted this particular Employee activity was New England area
folks who went to it. I also see where Geneva's outing was also
cancelled in the announcement, and in some responses I've seen
where other sites (Texas and Colorado I believe) had somewhat
similar events, although employees paid towards them versus the
Canobie Lake function which did not involve Employee's paying
for entrance to the park or the Tobin's food.
Like some others have far more eloquently stated though, I see some
of the remarks and comments which are not called for, serve no
constructive purpose, and in some cases are totally inappropriate.
While they may 'increase awareness' they also tend to increase
reciprocal responses of a like nature.
Just another two cents worth
-J-
|
1612.186 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:13 | 22 |
| re .183
Thanks for asking.
What I'd like to see has been suggested before:
Digital says "This year we are giving you $xxx worth of benefits.
Pick $xxx worth of benefits from the following list:"
Plan A Health insurance $xxxx
Plan b Health insurance $yyyy
LTD $zzzz
$aaa in Life insurance $bbbb
.
.
.
That way, people pick what they can use. Maybe the company saves money
because the company doesn't have to pay for stuff that few people
use.
Tom_K
|
1612.187 | | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:34 | 6 |
| Your welcome. My guess is it wouldn't be that simple. If we have 100
people taking advantage of a benefit and it costs the company $100 - if
one person droped the benefit my guess is that the company wouldn't
save $1. because the cost of each program is based on the group not on
the individual.
|
1612.188 | | COGITO::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:37 | 36 |
| RE: .175 by JSANTOS
>* Your Salary (relatively unchanged) - To who? You?
Obviously, seeing as how I haven't bothered to go and look everybody
else's up in VTX, mine's the only one I know about, but I get a sense
that a lot of people have not seen their salary increase much in the
past few years. Oh, they're probably amongst the deadwood we're getting
rid of, right? And the new hires we're picking up to replace them will
be even cheaper.
>* Vacation (2 weeks) - I've been here 14 years I get 4 weeks - how long
> have you been here?
You're in personnel and you can't figure that out?
>* Matching Gifts (I appreciate this one a lot) - Did you mis-write????
No. What do you take me for, a complete whiner?
>* Pension (if your vested?) Are you vested? "Most" employees are.
See vacation time above. By the way, if somebody gets canned two weeks
short of the five year mark, are they vested?
>If all these things we mentioned have little or no value to you why the
>heck do you have a problem with the cancellation of Canobie?
I did not say that "all" of them had little or no value, nor have I
ventured, at any time, in this or any other conference, an opinion as
to the importance of Canobie Lake Park as an employee benefit.
What I am saying is the value of the compensation offered by Digital
has been eroding in recent years. I'm not saying it's no better than
Burger Kringe or Junkin Donuts.
|
1612.189 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:39 | 13 |
| While I agree with .185 that it's unfortunate that this is becoming a
discussion of benefits in general, I'd like to get in one last lick
(it *is* sort of Canobie-Lake-related).
re .175:
> * Adoption Benefit (of limited use) - maybe to you. Do you know if this
> benefit costs more than Canobie?
OK, how much does the Adoption Benefit cost DEC? How much did Canobie Lake
cost? How much is it costing us to cancel it? Will it cost us anything
next year (assuming it's not going to be held then)? If this information's
not available to employees, why not?
|
1612.190 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Thu Aug 27 1992 11:54 | 10 |
| I know it isn't simple, but I believe that some other companies
manage to do it.
BTW: John, I appreciate your participation here. I'm hope it doesn't
come across as if I'm trying to beat you up. You've conducted
yourself quite professionally in some quite difficult discussions,
and while I don't always agree with you, I appreciate your point of
view.
Tom_K
|
1612.191 | ex | USPMLO::JSANTOS | | Thu Aug 27 1992 12:34 | 19 |
| re.190 Thanks. I for one think notes are very important to be aware
of. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people in this company that hold
the power to make sudden positive impacts with valid points in here that are
either read only or don't even bother to participate. I have learned
through notes (reading, writing and prompting others to write) that
notes is probibly the most valid communication tool we have at DEC.
How do I know this to be fact? Before I give any presentations (medical
benefits, LTD and others) I always check notes to find out what type of
questions I will be asked. More often than not the questions I'm asked
come out of here.
re. 189 I don't know the answers to your questions I simply asked the
question to make folks realize that every benefit, no matter how much
you or I use them, cost the company money and are very much appreciated
by the people who have/will use them. BTW, I've asked the same
questions you asked to people who *know* those answers and that
information wasn't available to me either. Why not? I don't know.
|
1612.192 | Going anyway | ELWOOD::MACADAM | | Thu Aug 27 1992 13:24 | 16 |
|
I promised my kids we would go whether DEC cancelled or not.
Does anyone know how late in the Fall the park typically
stays open to the general public. OR does anyone have a
phone number handy that one could call to find out?
Thanks,
Lew
By the way my kids don't consider Canobie Lake a second class
experience at all; to them its totally WONDERFUL!! It doesn't
matter to them how the experience compares to any other park.
They just TOTALLY enjoy what they have got available. Neat!
|
1612.193 | CLP open to the public thru Labor Day | SSGV01::CHALMERS | NOT the mama! | Thu Aug 27 1992 14:15 | 17 |
| FYI, Canobie Lake Park *normally* is open to the general public thru
Labor Day (9/7) only! In fact, their 1993 literature (and discount
coupons available thru various local merchants) attest to this date.
The reason for this relatively early 'closing' was due to the fact that
Digital booked the park for every weekend thru mid-late October. A
major win for CLP because they got guaranteed income thru the early fall,
rain or shine.
On such short notice, I don't know if CLP will open for general
admission in lieu of the DEC outing. If they've already been paid $xxx
for the DEC reservations, they may find it more profitable to stay
closed and layoff the seasonal employees a few weeks early.
If anyone knows for certain what their plans are, please post them
here.
Regards,
|
1612.194 | Off to find that site dog... | RTL::LINDQUIST | | Thu Aug 27 1992 15:29 | 23 |
| �� <<< Note 1612.179 by CUPTAY::BAILEY "Season of the Winch" >>>
�� -< maybe the dark is from your eyes ... >-
�� about. So Lee, let's say they did keep it. Would you be willing to
�� volunteer to be TFSO'ed, along with a few other folks, to pay for it?
�� I'll bet not. You can't have it both ways. We need to find ways to
�� cut discretionary spending, and this is one of the more sensible
�� decisions I've seen recently in that regard (IMO, of course).
Excuse me Mr. Winch, but I didn't mean to offer an opinion
on the canobie lake outing.
Someone rocked my dcu-as-a-benefit hobby horse, and I
couldn't resist the temptation to jump on.
However, a benefit of the cancellation will be the lack of notes
in this file complaining about:
1) How bad the food was / how long the food lines were.
2) How long the ride lines were.
3) How cold it was / why wasn't it earlier in the season.
4) Why can't I take my grandchildren.
5) Why do I see people drive up with 10+ "children"
6) Why don't parents control their rude children.
|
1612.195 | How about NO FOOD | AKOCOA::PILLIVANT | | Thu Aug 27 1992 15:45 | 6 |
| If, as rumor has it, (EMPHASIS ON RUMOR) that we had to pay for the
park - cancellation clause in contract - couldn't we open the park to
employees - no food! I'm sure that volunteers could be found to check
badges. Might keep everyone happy.
P.S. I have not gone for several years so I have no "self-interest".
|
1612.196 | Left off number 7 | WMOIS::MACK_J | | Thu Aug 27 1992 15:48 | 5 |
| RE: 194
It looks like number 7 could be Number of People complaining
about other benefits not covered in the Canobie Lake Park
note.
|
1612.197 | | CUPTAY::BAILEY | Season of the Winch | Thu Aug 27 1992 16:11 | 29 |
| >> Excuse me Mr. Winch, but I didn't mean to offer an opinion
>> on the canobie lake outing.
Oh? Then what's this (from your reply in .178)?
>> ...and now back to canobie lake, which as far as I can tell
>> infuriates both the people who don't go, and the people who
>> do. Or, maybe they do like the food, and they're just
>> teasin'!
As to the validity of this comment, I suspect the cancellation of the
Canobie Lake outing only infuriates the people who want things to get
better around here, but only if the solution means that somebody ELSE
has to make the sacrifices. IMO - there are more important problems
that affect our viability as a company that we could/should be spending
our energy resolving.
>> Someone rocked my dcu-as-a-benefit hobby horse, and I
>> couldn't resist the temptation to jump on.
OK, so it's no benefit to you. It is to me, and to a lot of folks
who choose to make use of it. By all means, stay on your hobby horse.
But please don't expect us all to get on there with you.
And of course, you do know my name isn't Mr. Winch, but I suppose
you're just teasin'!
... Bob
|
1612.198 | CLP open through 13 Sep '92 | WSINT::HOUSE | Kenny House - MLO5-2/E45 - DTN 223-6720 | Thu Aug 27 1992 18:27 | 9 |
| When I called Canobie Lake Park last night, they said they were open
through 13 September 1992. Hours are 12:00 noon through 10:00 PM,
every day of the week.
I'm planning on taking my kids next week, but I've been doing that on
my own for the past few years anyway. [I've only been a Digital
employee for seven months!]
-- Kenny House
|
1612.199 | | CSC32::J_OPPELT | I saw the hoodoos. | Mon Aug 31 1992 20:17 | 6 |
| What's all this talk about DEC doing outings? I thought we were
a valuing differences company?
Oh, sorry.
Wrong note.
|
1612.200 | | POBOX::RILEY | I *am* the D.J. | Mon Aug 31 1992 21:26 | 12 |
| >>What's all this talk about DEC doing outings? I thought we were
>>a valuing differences company?
>>
>>Oh, Sorry.
>>
>>Wrong note.
Wrong conference too :-) But it gave me a much needed laugh at the
end of today.
"jackin' the house", Bob
|
1612.201 | It will be missed by some.... | MR4DEC::LSIGEL | When stars collide, like you and I | Tue Sep 01 1992 17:30 | 7 |
| It seems like most is putting down the Canobie outing, personally I
thaught it was wonderful (the food??? &'p). Seeing many people that I
have worked with in the past made it even more fun, to catch up with
old freinds etc. And going on the rides made one forget about being an
adult for a day. Even though it cost the company a lotof money, it will
be missed. Maybe when the company is in better shape someday they will
bring it back.
|
1612.202 | Don't believe everything they tell you | ROYALT::D_KELLEHER | | Tue Sep 01 1992 18:13 | 13 |
| Just a friendly warning.........Canobie can close at ANY time after
Sept. 7th!!!! THEY ARE MAKING NO PROMISES!!!
My sister works in the food service main office and they have been warned
that the actual closing date for the Park will be based on
attendance this weekend!!!!!!
If you have ANY plans to get to the Park this year....try to go this
weekend (if your trying to avoid crowds - go at night - my family
went last night 6:00-10:00 and it was great - lines were VERY short
my husband and my sister went on the cork-screw roller coaster 3 TIMES)
|
1612.203 | $$$ ? | SCOTIA::PASCO | Mark Pascarelli | Wed Sep 02 1992 09:21 | 5 |
| How much for last nite ???
Thanks
pasco
|
1612.204 | $8.00 ----- I Think! | ROYALT::D_KELLEHER | | Wed Sep 02 1992 09:31 | 4 |
| I think it is $8.00 for 6:00-10:00pm.......I really didn't pay
attention, We had free passes (an added bonus from my sister)
|
1612.205 | I went yesterday | WSINT::HOUSE | Kenny House - MLO5-2/E45 - DTN 223-6720 | Wed Sep 02 1992 09:34 | 15 |
| Well, I took off yesterday afternoon to take my family to Canobie Lake
Park. We were there from about 1:30 until 8:50 PM, had a great time,
spent a bit under $100 for the four of us ($51 entrance fee, at $14 for
three people over four feet tall, plus $9 for the shorty; the rest for
lunch, snack, dinner; no souvenirs, no quarters for games), we were
all tired and happy when we left (I suspended my usual case of
"grumpies" for the day).
I asked about dates, and was told that they were open daily through
Labor Day weekend, and then the next two weekends. This differs from
what I was told, and reported a few replies back, that they were to
open daily through the 14th. Since it seems that they are somewhat
up-in-the-air about dates, it would be prudent to call before going.
-- Kenny House
|
1612.206 | | SALEM::BERUBE_C | Claude, G. | Wed Sep 02 1992 10:47 | 5 |
| If your going to take the family etc. to Canobie, do yourself a favor
stop by the Macdonald's on rt 28 and pick up some $3 off coupon's to
save yourself some $'s.
Claude
|
1612.207 | | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Riding off into the sunset... | Wed Sep 02 1992 14:15 | 4 |
| I have a stack of those coupons on my desk.....Unfortunately, they
expire Sept 4th!!!
If anybody would like some?????
|
1612.208 | No time to read all .207 notes. | BEEMER::LAVOIE | Tom Lavoie 293-5705 | Wed Sep 02 1992 16:58 | 8 |
| I heard that because the outing was cancelled after June 1 that the
invoice from Canobie must be paid in full -- $243,000.00. And
that Tobin is charging $75,000.00 due to such a late cancellation.
Comments?
Tom
|
1612.209 | | TOMK::KRUPINSKI | Repeal the 16th Amendment! | Wed Sep 02 1992 17:06 | 5 |
| If this is true, (remember, you "heard" it) then one wonders
what, outside of the minimal cost of passing out the tickets,
saving to the company resulted from the decision to cancel.
Tom_K
|
1612.210 | Didn't ESPN explain it? | RIPPLE::NORDLAND_GE | Waiting for Perot :^) | Wed Sep 02 1992 18:22 | 4 |
|
Perception is everything
(almost) Agassi :^)
|
1612.211 | | A1VAX::GRIFFIN | | Thu Sep 03 1992 08:41 | 11 |
| Remember that the announcement of WANG's trip to Maui was made
one day before the Canobie cancellation? I can't help but think that
the negative press received by the WANG outing (while they were about
to announce bankruptcy proceedings) might have been the impetus for
canceling Canobie Lake activities one day later. Could just be a
coincidence of course.
I for one was perfectly happy to see the thing canceled - assuming that
there was some cost savings involved - I'd question the validity of the
prior note about having to pay for it anyway, unless those payments are
cancellation charges LESS than what it would have cost in full.
|
1612.212 | | MR4DEC::LSIGEL | When stars collide, like you and I | Thu Sep 03 1992 11:16 | 5 |
| DEC actually paid all that to rent the Park and the Tobins food??? And
now they can not get thier money back? How is the company saving money?
That is a lot of clams! UGH! I can see cancelling it if they did not
spend the money inthe first place but everything was all set and the
moeny was spent.
|
1612.213 | Maybe............ | GENRAL::INDERMUEHLE | Stonehenge Alignment Service | Thu Sep 03 1992 11:19 | 18 |
| >> <<< Note 1612.208 by BEEMER::LAVOIE "Tom Lavoie 293-5705" >>>
>> -< No time to read all .207 notes. >-
>>
>> I heard that because the outing was cancelled after June 1 that the
>> invoice from Canobie must be paid in full -- $243,000.00. And
>> that Tobin is charging $75,000.00 due to such a late cancellation.
>>
>> Comments?
I was told a couple of years ago, by a personnel type, that Digital
figured a average of $90 per employee for these outings. This accounts
for family sizes. If you assume that there are potentially 30,000
New England employees to plan for, that is over $2.5 million in expense.
Sounds like cancellation fee to me, and a corporate savings.
John I.
|
1612.214 | Message received, SIR! | CORPRL::RALTO | It's all part of the show! | Thu Sep 03 1992 12:39 | 13 |
| re: along the lines of "But... but... we didn't save any money!"
You don't understand...
This wasn't done to save money.
This was done to show us "who's boss" now.
They seemed to be going out of their way to make
this quite clear in the original announcement; at
least that's the impression I was left with.
Chris
|
1612.215 | | SYORPD::DEEP | Bob Deep - SYO, DTN 256-5708 | Thu Sep 03 1992 14:05 | 6 |
| Some of you are jumping to conclusions based on rumours. (Not a big problem,
I do it all the time!) 8^)
The problem is when you don't recognize that fact.
Bob
|
1612.216 | Let me get my club! | MR4DEC::LSIGEL | When stars collide, like you and I | Thu Sep 03 1992 17:37 | 1 |
| Gee they keep the Golf Classic though ;')
|
1612.217 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Sep 04 1992 08:45 | 3 |
| Sure sends the "right" type of message...eh?
Marc H.
|
1612.218 | management could fess up | LEDS::NEUMYER | en slips naturiste | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:37 | 11 |
|
A lot could be done to end this confusion...
How about an official statement as to whether the money figures
stated in here are the total fee or the cancellation charges (ie - did
we save money on THIS years outing or not).
But I doubt we will ever see that kind of announcement!!
ed
|
1612.219 | Re: Golf Classic | STAR::PARKE | True Engineers Combat Obfuscation | Fri Sep 04 1992 11:59 | 1 |
| How many times has the DIGITAL Canobie outing been shown on National TV ?
|
1612.220 | | VAXSOC::LAVOIE | Tom Lavoie 293-5705 | Fri Sep 04 1992 12:50 | 4 |
| re -1
Your point?
|
1612.221 | Keep the Classic.. | BSS::GROVER | The CIRCUIT_MAN | Fri Sep 04 1992 12:51 | 16 |
| In all fairness to the Digital Classic.... This is a MAJOR marketing
event for the company. It gives us major national notoriety. This is
much better than the PBS marketing idea....
Keep the classic..... Put Canobie on hold (hopefully) for better times.
I do agree though, if money has already been spent..., at least keep
the dates open.... and maybe offer the outing with stipulation that the
employee pays their own way.... If there were enough participation,
maybe Digital would get their deposit money back.????
Tobin could still provide the goodies.... Having the employee pay as
they go, at cafateria prices (or lower)... Maybe if Tobin makes enough
from this, they will also release the deposit, back to Digital.
Just a thought.
|
1612.222 | Priorities here... | WMOIS::MACK_J | | Fri Sep 04 1992 13:41 | 16 |
| RE: Keeping the Digital Classic -
(Set mode SARCASM)
Let's get real here. If we cancel the Digital Classic
we won't have photo's of V.P.'s handing over the
obligatory oversized check for $75,000.00 to some
underpaid professional golfer. Plus how would we ever
peddle all those Hats and Tee-shirts that say DIGITAL
SENIORS CLASSIC on them? Not to mention that we wouldn't
have these photo's for the back page of the DTW? Now
what was that about trimming expenses?
(Set SARCASM OFF)
- J -
|
1612.223 | What if ? | RIPPLE::NORDLAND_GE | Waiting for Perot :^) | Fri Sep 04 1992 14:04 | 12 |
|
OK, 200+ notes later
What if we spent as much effort analyzing lost sales and missed
opportunities, would they go away too?
Unfortunately, we analyze the trivial and just run away from the big
business failures and learn nothing from them, dooming ourselves to
repeat them over and over and ...
This must change
JN
|
1612.224 | getting real | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | | Fri Sep 04 1992 14:48 | 29 |
|
Digital Seniors Classic
o Air time on ESPN for 4 days
o DIGITAL commercials throughout
o DIGITAL mentioned several times throughout by announcers
o DIGITAL signs at every tee, scoreboard, and each group
o A very affluent audience with a high probability of
interest in DIGITAL products
o Charity
o Tax write-offs
o Product booths featuring new PC's and Alpha
Companies such as Cadillac and IBM are involved in virtually
every Senior and PGA Tournament. Why we didn't go after the
scoreboard contract is beyond me. It's shown several times
an hour 4 days of more than 40 weeks each year!!
Virtually every golf tournament other than the Majors are
sponsered by large corporations. It's terrific that we're
finally on TV!!
Why don't people see this for the marketing opportunity
it is? I remember the beautiful 2 page Digital ad for
America's Cup and how it was DEC equipment on board.
Hopefully there will be many more of these to come.
Tom
|
1612.225 | RE: 224. some good points but... | WMOIS::MACK_J | | Fri Sep 04 1992 15:56 | 18 |
| RE.224 - all fairly good points, can't argue much with them from
one perspective. However, the topic under discussion was not whether
the Digital Classic was a good marketing resource but rather the
cancellation of an employee event, which perhaps might just as
well tie into cancelling other events. As far as Television
commercials goes, Digital could buy time as do other major
companies as just as well. As with the Canobie Lake Park
cancellation (which I personally support) I guess it's all
a matter of personal opinion in the end as far as how you feel
about it.
_ J _
P.S. ESPN is not received in all areas, I'd hope that the
coverage was not simply Eastern U.S. but that it was
cross country....othewise someone from say the West
Coast might wonder why Digital isn't sponsoring similar
events out that way ala' Canobie Lake Park.
|
1612.226 | DEC is different this year (re: .214) | QETOO::SCARDIGNO | God is my refuge | Fri Sep 04 1992 17:09 | 21 |
|
RE: .214
> You don't understand...
> This wasn't done to save money.
> This was done to show us "who's boss" now.
I tend to agree with Chris. Things won't be the same at DEC
anymore. Last year we were told it wasn't cancelled 'cause it
was a way of employee appreciation. THIS year, things are
definitely different. And, why wasn't it cancelled in before
the "deadline"? If they just wanted to same some $ on it,
there's many ways to cut back the waste (ie- meal tickets,
proof of family members, not to mention people taking cartons
of ice cream bars on the last days). It's a shame we go to
the extremes, instead of some happy meduim.
Steve
|
1612.227 | It would worth it!! | MR4DEC::LSIGEL | When stars collide, like you and I | Fri Sep 04 1992 17:40 | 6 |
| I think if everyone paid 5-10 a head it would have been worth it to
keep the outing. Many employees would understand that times are tough.
We could have kept the outing if someone figured out something like
this. I am sure many employees would pay to give themselves and
espeially their kids a day of fun and for us to see our freinds and
co-workers.
|