T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1067.9 | fuel filters | SA1794::TENEROWICZT | | Tue Jan 31 1989 09:47 | 28 |
| I quess this is as good a place as any to have a discussion on fuel
filters......
Statement..... I don't use a fuel filter on the airplane.
Feel they cause more problems than they solve.
What I do, do rather is;
1, Flush all new tanks prior to assembly.
2, Use the new tank once assembled on a test
stand
3, Filter fuel entering the tank.
It took me about two years to come up with this system. And I can
say that it works. I can't remember that last time I field cleaned
a carb.
Oh, one other suggestion. Purchase some paint
strainers and use one when your pouring fuel from a new gallon into
the fuel container on your flight box.
Tom
|
1067.1 | You got it right! | GENRAL::BALDRIDGE | Now it's Summer!!! | Mon Jul 31 1989 18:13 | 14 |
| If you have a klunk in your fuel can and an in-line filter in your
pump line, that is usually sufficient, but you're right, by pushing
the fuel into your on-board fuel tank, you *ARE* risking some
possibility of trash on the *WRONG* side of the on-board klunk.
This, however, is how most folks do it. You can use the third hole
in the on-board tank stopper, but you have to put a plug of some
sort in the end after you add fuel thru this third line.
If you really want to spend some bucks ($), you can look into the
DuBro Qwick Fill. This is a really slick method, but, like I say,
$$!!!!!
Chuck
|
1067.2 | wanted: a fuel tank finisher | ABACUS::RYDER | perpetually the bewildered beginner | Mon Jul 31 1989 18:28 | 14 |
| On a related issue, are there vendors who do the tank plumbing for
a fee?
After three installations, fuel tank plumbing is NOT my favorite
pastime. I have the Sullivan(?) set of tubing benders, and I have used
the Casey solder-in-the-tube technique with some success, but I still
have an intense dislike for this task. Someone with experience and an
extensive set of really proper tools and jigs could do these
installations a dime a dozen and charge a lot more. Part of the
problem is the trial-and-error aspect of doing only a few. Part
is my lack of experience, having done this so few times. Part is
the expense of building a good tubing bender for this small tubing.
Alton, the tormented tiny tubing twister
|
1067.3 | TRY THE HAYES TYPE TANK.... | PNO::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Mon Jul 31 1989 19:08 | 26 |
| Al,
You might want to look into the Hayes (formerly Kraft-Hayes) line
of fuel tanks. This type is a square tank with a "toe" at the bottom
front of it to prevent its sliding forward, pinching off the fuel
line(s). This is probably the easiest tank in the world to rig
as it requires no brass tubing bending, in fact it uses no brass
tubing whatever. You simply attach the clunk tubing to the nipple
on the back of the stopper, insert stopper in tank and secure with a
metal compression ring...all hand installed. overflow and/or fill
line(s) are nipples molded into the front of the tank and you simply
drill through the nipple to open it, attach silicone tubing and yer'
done. DuBro makes a similar looking tank but I'm not certain whether
it uses the same plumbing scheme or not...check it out.
I personally prefer the Sullivan tank and have encountered little
difficulty shaping the bendable, soft brass tubing supplied with
them. Another alternative might be to simply substitute same dia.
copper tubing for the brass...you can make a pretzle outa' that
stuff without kinking it!
|
| | 00 Adios, Al
|_|_| ( >o
| Z__(O_\_ (The Desert Rat)
|
1067.4 | tank alternates appreciated | ABACUS::RYDER | perpetually the bewildered beginner | Tue Aug 01 1989 07:26 | 9 |
| I'll check out the Hayes and DuBro tanks today if Tom's in Chelmsford
carries them. I'm not very proud of the workmanship that I have
just finished. Thanks for the tip.
Because I have never heard of a vendor for this service and because
it seems to be only this beginner doing the grumping, I conclude
that this operation will become trivial after more experience.
Alton who won't need to do this for his Gentle Lady
|
1067.5 | I recommend an in-line fuel filter | LEDS::HUGHES | Dave Hughes (LEDS::HUGHES) NKS1-1/E3 291-7214 | Tue Aug 01 1989 11:35 | 61 |
|
Back to the original question...
I have MY way of doing it which of course is better than anybody
else's way, although not everybody will agree with me which shows
their lack of insight :-)
I use an in-line filter between the tank and carb. I tried to do
without it on my Super Sportster 20 because there isn't much room,
and got burned eventually when I got some crap into the needle valve.
It took me a few days to diagnose and fix the problem, and fortunately
the engine quitting in mid-flight was always at a place I could bring
the plane back to the field, rather than dropping it in the woods
or the Royal Indian Swamp. I use a filter now.
There are 3 ways to use the in-line filter without back-flushing it
while filling, which I recommend against for the reasons stated (you
can get crap on the carb side of the filter which will then wash
right back into the carb).
1. If there is room, leave enough of a loop in the fuel line-filter
connection to disconnect the line BEHIND (tank side) the filter
while filling. This is how I do it on both of my Super Sportsters
and my Kavalier. That way, the in-line filter only gets fuel in
one direction always - toward the carb. The SS-20 is very tight but
I use a "crap-trap" filter, which is a clear plastic tube with fittings
on both ends that is slightly flexible and wraps around the cylinder
just enough to make it fit.
2. Use a 3rd fuel line into the tank for filling. I did this on my Kadet
which had a cowl that I wanted to keep the fuel line inside. I added a
3rd fuel line which I connected to another clunk inside the tank (it can
be a short clunk, it doesn't have to be able to flop around, just rest
on the bottom of the tank). I did all my fueling/defueling with this 3rd
line and stuck a screw in it to block it off after fueling. On the
Kadet, this was fairly elegant because I routed the 3rd line through a
small hole in the bottom of the cowl, it stuck out about an inch and the
carb line and filter were entirely inside the cowl.
3. Use one of the filler valves available on the market. I've never
used these, and I've heard reports that they work good and other reports
that they are unreliable, leaking fuel and/or air. They're also
more expensive than I think they're worth. They go in-line, between
the in-line filter and the tank, and have an external fitting for
fueling.
I recommend approach #1 for the PT40, the engine is pretty much out in
the open and there should be room to fit the filter.
Another thought - the Kavalier also has a cowl and it was hard to fish
out the fuel line. In addition, the filter vibrated against the engine
mount and I thought it might wear a hole in the filter. So, I glued a
small block of balsa to the side of the engine mount with a hole in it
that snugly fits the filter. It holds it in place and keeps it from
rubbing on anything, and is out of sight behind the cowl.
I also keep a filter in-line in the fuel fill line from my flight box.
If you want to be doubly safe you could make that filter removable
and reverse it for fueling/defueling, but I don't bother.
Dave Hughes
|
1067.6 | Agree with first three, and here's another | LEDS::LEWIS | | Tue Aug 01 1989 14:13 | 20 |
|
RE: .-1
I used method #1 on two of my planes and don't find it at all
inconvenient to unplug the fuel line at the rear of the filter
to refuel. It's my favorite because it's simple.
If you decide to use a refueling valve I'd avoid the plastic one
that you twist 90 degrees to fuel up (don't recall the name of it)
The one I had didn't last very long. I like the aluminum one with
a thing you plug in to refill (Kwik-fill???) but I heard Ajai recently
had a problem with his sticking open, preventing fuel flow to his
engine. I still think it's a better design than the plastic one.
Here's a fourth suggestion to add to Dave's first three. Use
a refueling valve, but feed it to the third line into the tank and
block off the unused side. Then you don't need to plug the open
end after you refuel and you don't have to worry about the valve
failing and causing engine trouble.
Bill
|
1067.7 | | SA1794::TENEROWICZT | | Tue Aug 01 1989 14:24 | 16 |
| Most Pattern birds use NO IN LINE FUEL FILTERS OR PRESSURE LINE
FILTERS.
Rather the tank is cleaned prior to installation with fuel and in
lost cases used on a test stand. Then a fuel filter is installed
between the fuel tank on the flight box and the filler tube. This
way clean fuel goes in. Exhaust residue from pressurizing the tank
is spent fuel and oil. This mixes with the new fuel and isn't a
factor.
Make sure the tank is clean and what goes in the tank is clean and
your all set.
Tom
|
1067.8 | I have been doing just what Tom said | LEDS::WATT | | Tue Aug 01 1989 15:15 | 13 |
| I have been using Tom's method. I have never had a filter in a plane
until just recently on my OS120 pumper. I have a filter on my fuel
filler line and this has worked fine for me. If I have a question
about my fuel being contaminated, I chuck it out. I very rarely have
had engine problems using this technique. I am not against putting a
fuel filter on board the plans, I just have not found it necessary. It
is VERY important to clean the tank before installing it. Little
flakes of plastic are in there waiting to clog your engine. These
flakes are invisible devils. I blow my tanks out with compressed air
right before installing the stopper.
Charlie
|