T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
131.1 | smoke systems | 3417::JORGENSEN | | Wed Aug 19 1987 21:35 | 8 |
| I'm working on my Balsa USA Citabria Aero Pro and am planning putting in an on
board smoke system. I've never seen one used at the fields I've flown at but
I'm told they work all-right. Has anyone had any experience with them. The
one I bought is the Harry Higly Lots of Smoke.... I'm not sure what type of
Smoke "juice" to use, or how to mix it if necessary. Any ideas??? I'm using
the Super Tiger .90 Two stroke.
/Brian
|
131.2 | I smell smoke! | MDVAX1::SPOHR | | Fri Aug 21 1987 12:09 | 6 |
| There is an article in RCM (September Issue, I think) on smoke systems
and making your own smoke fluid.
lotsa luck,
Chris Spohr
|
131.3 | RCM September '87, page 6 | AKOV01::CAVANAGH | We don't need no stinkin badges! | Fri Aug 21 1987 14:29 | 10 |
|
> It is possible that it may be in the August issue, but I believe
> its the Sept. issue under one of the monthly columns. Near the
> front if I remember.
The article is in the September issue on page 6. It gives diagrams
of several different setups.
Jim C
|
131.4 | smoking with a OS-61? | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Jeff Friedrichs 381-1116 | Tue Aug 25 1987 09:16 | 10 |
| But, after reading the article, there is still one question...
Can smoke be used on 4-strokes?? It should be easier to burn the
smoke mixture because the exhaust temp is so much higher. Or is
it too high?? Also, is there enough crankcase pressure?? My OS-61
already has a fitting on the crankcase. Can I use that??
Thanks,
jeff
|
131.5 | WING TIP SMOKE SYSTEM | SVCRUS::EVERS | | Thu Sep 03 1987 12:20 | 7 |
| HI
SEEING HOW THIS NOTE IS ABOUT SMOKE SYSTEMS,I'M WONDERING IF
THERE IS A SMOKE SYSTEM OUT THERE FOR WING TIPS.I HAVEN'T HEARD
OF ANY,SO I WAS JUST WONDERING THAT'S ALL.
KEEP'EM FLYING
JERRY
|
131.6 | SMOKE-BOMBS | GHANI::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT RC-AV8R | Thu Sep 03 1987 13:05 | 5 |
| Jerry,
The only ones I've ever seen were of the "smoke-bomb" variety.
Al
|
131.7 | Where are the Smoke Experts? | LEDS::WATT | | Fri Apr 01 1988 13:22 | 11 |
| I'm here, and I am also interested in smoke systems. Unfortunately,
I don't have any experience with them. I would like to put one
in my next plane, a Sportster 90. I am going to use a 4-stroke
in it. I have heard that it is easier to generate smoke with a
4-stroke because the exhaust temperature is much hotter. I would
like to see a working smoke system before trying to design one myself.
Getting the smoke mixture to the proper temperature and dispensing
it into the muffler at the proper rate must take some good planning.
Charlie
|
131.8 | need more details | SKIVT::SOUTIERE | | Fri Apr 01 1988 14:37 | 23 |
| Charlie, I just bought a Super Chipmunk and there is a part on smoke
systems. It says that more heat is generated from 2 strokes and
that a special heating coil would be necessary with a 4 stroke.
I'll double check tonight!
The plans tell me what I need as far as an extra servo, oil (smoke)
tank, switch device etc. but what I'm after is info on specific
brands and the complexity of installation and use and price. The
one thing that has always bothered me about this hobby is that you
always need more than is shown. For example, when you buy a plane,
"...and now sir, would you like the accessory kit too? You know,
the wheels, gas tank.........."
As far as the smoke system, I would like to hear from someone who
has one and exactly what was needed and how much the TOTAL price
was.
* ** * *
Ken *** * * * **
* ** * * * ** * *** \____----__|
* * * * ** ** ***************-/\---|
|
131.9 | 4-stroke exhaust should be hotter | LEDS::WATT | | Fri Apr 01 1988 15:14 | 10 |
| re-.2
Ken,
I would be surprised if anyone could say that a 2-stroke exhaust
is hotter than a 4-stroke. I think that the tricky part of a smoke
system would be the preheat coil that goes into the muffler. I
haven't seen what one should look like. If you have any info on
this, I would like to hear more about it.
Charlie
|
131.10 | Simple! | CURIE::ANKER | Anker Berg-Sonne | Mon Mar 20 1989 16:30 | 20 |
| Re:< Note 131.9 by BRNIN::SOUTIERE >
Smoke systems have been covered several times in RCM and
MA. The simplest consist of a tank containing diesel fuel, some
kind of pump (e.g. Perry) and a servo controlled valve. The
diesel fuel is simply dumped into the muffler where the heat
turns it into smoke. Some day I will play with one.
_
/ |
| _====____/==|
|-/____________|
| | o \
O \
O
Hang in there! o_|_
|
Anker \_|_/
|
131.11 | Ah...A tailslide with smoke on! Perfecico!! | CSC32::M_ANTRY | | Tue Mar 21 1989 08:37 | 17 |
| The best smoke that I seen was from a oil called ALMAG which is
a Aluminum/Magnesium cutting fluid. It is available from most bulk
oil distributers by the 5gal can. I have about 4 gals of this stuff
left since I sold my 1/4 scale plane.
I thought that the smoke was most fun about flying.
I used a DON HARRIS pump which is a small self contained pump that
runs from 2 AA batteries and is controled by a seperate
servo/microswitch. Pull up, roll inverted, pull under, smoke on,
accross midfield, slow roll, smoke off, pull up. It was great!!!!
Be carefull about diesel fuel and rubber products. I once ran some
diesel through my pump in the winter when the oil was too thick
and it caused all the rubber seals to swell. Diesel/Gasoline are
alot different than alcohol based glo fuels.
|
131.12 | Check Valve essential | CSC32::M_ANTRY | | Tue Mar 21 1989 08:39 | 4 |
|
Also use a check valve of some kind as close to the muffler as possible
to keep the back pressure from forcing the smoke fluid back down
the tubing.
|
131.13 | Smoke 'em | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | A fresh start | Tue Mar 21 1989 10:09 | 26 |
| Ahhhh... finally someone that has run one!!
Tell us more about the pump... Where did you get it? What kind
of check valve did you use?? I was thinking of using a check valve
from my aquarium, but I was not sure how the latex (?) valve would
stand up.
Is this oil as detrimental to rubber as gas/diesel?? Did you use
a preheating coil or was the exhaust temp high enough??
How much does it gunk up the plane??
----
I had planned to install a smoke system in my SS-40. I bought the
DUBRO smoke system. I was never very happy with the installation
and I was not thrilled with drilling the back plate of my engine.
Plus, there is limited room in an SS-40.
What I had recently decided to do, but am still in the design stages
of, was to make a removeable pod that contains the oil tank, server
and switch. This would attach right under the wing. A tube would
run up to the muffler through the fuse.
jeff (starting to get excited about smoke again)
|
131.14 | More SMOKIN details | CSC32::M_ANTRY | | Tue Mar 21 1989 12:01 | 30 |
| The pump was made by Don Harris out of California. Now remember
this was in a large 1/4 scale plane so room and weight were not
a problem.
The whole package came from Don Harris which included the check
valve. Any check valve would work. You just dont want the muffler
pressure to force the oil back into the tank. You want it so that
when you send Oil to the muffler it will only be a inch away and
wont have to prime the whole line each time.
The pump that I was using was a little pump unit that was about
1.5"x1.5"x3" and that included 2 AA batteries a small motor and
a small gear driven pump. The micro switch would turn on the motor
and it will suck the oil out of the tank and push it into the muffler.
HEAT.
The engine was a Zenoah G-38. I think there is a problem with glo
engines not being hot enough to vaporize the oil but I cant comment
on that.
Like I said be carefull of gas/diesel around rubber. It will generaly
swell up any rubber that it doesnt like and ruin it. The Oil did
not effect any of the rubber like gas/diesel.
I would give Don Harris a call if you can find his number. I am
sorry I dont have it.
I think that covered it. I dont know how to manipulate the
"notes$scratch" buffer so that I can see your last reply.
|
131.15 | details | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Go B's!! | Tue Mar 21 1989 13:50 | 16 |
| Thanks for the info..
weight is not a problem for me... The SS-40 is powered by a K&B60.
Size is of concern, but not a major one as I will not be constrained
by fuse dimensions.
Heat - I think I am going to wrap a copper pipe around the muffler
a couple of times to pre-heat the oil.
Anyone have a simple design for an on/off switch directly connected
to the Rx to avoid size and hassle problems with servo's and micro
switches?
thanks,
jeff
|
131.16 | It just so happens... | SMART5::DHENRY | | Tue Mar 21 1989 15:05 | 13 |
| RE: < Note 131.15 by WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS "Go B's!!" >
> Anyone have a simple design for an on/off switch directly connected
> to the Rx to avoid size and hassle problems with servo's and micro
> switches?
RCM had such a beasty in a short article complete with plans a couple
of issues back. If you'd like you can borrow my copy. I'll look it up
tonight and post the issue date and page number tomorrow.
Later,
Don
|
131.17 | Two suggestions! | PEE47::COX | So Speedy, how do we get zeez brains? | Tue Mar 21 1989 15:14 | 15 |
| HERE ARE TWO IDEAS FOR PUMPS:
1. About a year or two ago, Model Aviation ran a construction article
on the Super Doubler II. It used a Perry pump, an oscillating pump
that crankcase pressure. For control they used a servo operated pinch
valve.
2. If you want to use an electric pump then I would suggest
controlling it with a Jomar Universal Electronic Switch ($35.00). This
way you don't have to mess with a servo activated switch.
--|-- Happy (con)Trails!
(O)
_______/ \_______ Scott Cox
|
131.18 | | TANG::FRIEDRICHS | Go B's!! | Wed Mar 29 1989 00:36 | 16 |
| The servo will now operate continuously in one direction at the
flip of the gear switch.
Now what I need is ideas on how to convert/build a pump on the top
of the servo. Tonight I tried a basic "six-shooter" style pump
where the tube was squegeed. This worked OK, but I am having trouble
getting all of the pieces to stay together....
Any ideas are welcome, either enhancing what I am trying to do or
a different design all together...
I am going to call Don Harris and I might order his electric pump...
cheers,
jeff
|
131.19 | How about Muffler Pressure or Perry | LEDS::WATT | | Wed Mar 29 1989 09:30 | 11 |
| How about trying to run it off of muffler pressure. (with a check
valve) That might save the weight of a pump. Most suitable pumps
that I can think of would be big and heavy. The other possiblilty
would be to use a perry pump either off of crankcase pressure or
one of the oscillating types that works off of engine vibration.
These are fairly light. The only problem withe the oscillating
one is that it must be mounted to the engine rear cover and there
is often not room there.
Charlie
|
131.20 | Pressure = erusserP | RDGE44::LEEK_9 | $ set system/clairvoyant | Thu Mar 30 1989 05:09 | 23 |
|
Re .19
> How about trying to run it off of muffler pressure. (with a check
That's not going to work since that's the force you need to
overcome to get the oil in there. "Every Action Has An Equal And Opposite
Re-action" and all that Newtonian stuff.
Re .8
Dave,
If you are looking for a smoke system in the UK, try the Ghost Squadron.
I saw these guys at a show in Oxford last year where they flew a couple of
nice beasts with smoke on. I believe they flog all kinds of gizmos and
gadgets (failsafes, battery monitors, etc.) but I can't recall the real
name (or address) of the company. I'll have a hunt through the mags. 'cause
I'm sure I've seen them in there SOMEWHERE.
Ken Lee.
P.S. Dave, if you are putting smoke on your chopper, I hope it doesn't
disappear in the hover!!!
|
131.21 | It can Work | LEDS::WATT | | Thu Mar 30 1989 13:48 | 4 |
| Not to argue too much, but muffler pressure is not constant and
depending where you inject, there may even be a vacuum.
Charlie
|
131.22 | First attempt! | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Go B's!! | Wed Apr 26 1989 11:10 | 39 |
| Well Charlie, you may have hit the nail on the head with this
statement...
" Not to argue too much, but muffler pressure is not constant and
depending where you inject, there may even be a vacuum. "
Last night was my first attempt at using smoke... I ended up buying
the Don Harris pump and using a modified servo to turn it on/off.
I used straight kerosene for both flights..
Flight 1 - I had a restricting collar on the line going to the muffler
as I thought that the dump rate would be too high. However, during
the flight the application of the pump did not change the amount
of smoke. There was a lightly visible smoke stream for most of
the flight. I believe (although I have yet to prove) that a venturi
effect was happening and the kerosene was being sucked through.
My other theory is that the tank vent placement is creating positive
pressure in the tank and pushing the kerosene through...
Flight 2 - For some reason my "servo-switch" (my modified servo)
was stuck in the on position. I had removed the restricting collar.
During this flight the smoke quantity was better, but since I could
not control the pump, I could not examine what was going on in the
pump off condition.
I couldn't play with it anymore, as on the second flight I went
deadstick during the downwind to base leg turn on approach and I
ran out of altitude into a small pine. Minor damage but I needed
a monokote iron before I could fly again...
Next time I hope to try some cutting oil.... The people at Don
Harris suggest mixing cutting oil with mineral spirits for the best
smoke. I also have to sort out my switch problem..
Getting there!
jeff
|
131.23 | ALMAG cutting oil is SMOKIEEEEr | CSC32::M_ANTRY | | Wed Apr 26 1989 12:45 | 19 |
| The best Oil that we found for smoke systems was "ALMAG" made by
TEXECO (sp) you know the gas station people. ALMAG stands for
Aluminum/Magnesium Cutting Oil. It worked just great and put out
more smoke than you can believe. There is nothing more fun that
to pull up verticle with smoke on to the point of a stall and then
tail slide back thru your own smoke to the point that for 1-2 seconds
you cant see your plane for the smoke.
The ALMAG oil can general be purchase thru a bulk distributor in
a 5 gal can for around $20.00. This is the same Oil that is used
on Pitts and the such while they are performing in Airshows.
Also as the Don Harris shows a restrictor I too found that it didnt
need one. Just pump it in full force, fully concentrated. You
may find that in the winter you may need to cut it with a little
mineral sprirts to help the viscosity due to the cold.
Keep us posted....
|
131.24 | Need more input..... | BRNIN::SOUTIERE | | Fri May 05 1989 14:48 | 5 |
| If you could, explain the connections to the muffler. I'm still
confused on this part. Do you have to drill a hole in the muffler
for the smoke connection?
Ken
|
131.25 | question for you smokers | LEDS::LEWIS | | Mon May 08 1989 16:03 | 5 |
|
Does the smoke system make a real mess all over the plane, or is it
comparable to the mess you get from a 2-stroke engine?
Bill
|
131.27 | answers to .24 and .25 | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Go B's!! | Tue May 09 1989 16:04 | 20 |
| Sorry, I was out on vacation for the last 1.5 weeks. Over 300 unseen
notes in RC alone!!
re .24 - Yes, you drill a hole in the muffler, tap the hole and
screw in a standard brass nippled fitting (just like the one that
is there for as a pressure takeoff). The key to this is to make
sure that you have the proper tap for the fitting that you have
(Thanks Al!)
re .25 - Using kerosene alone, I did not notice any additional goop
above what I already get from my 2 stroke. The whole theory is
that is is vaporized easily.
This week I need to repair my plane and locate some cutting oil.
Perhaps I will be able to give it a try this weekend.
cheers,
jeff
|
131.28 | where should the muffler hole be drilled? | BRNIN::SOUTIERE | | Wed May 10 1989 10:32 | 7 |
| Thanks Jeff, but I have one more question;
Does it matter where on the muffler the hole is drilled? Should
it be towards the front or rear of the muffler or would it hurt
to put it right next to the existing one?
Ken
|
131.29 | Dunno yet | WRASSE::FRIEDRICHS | Go B's!! | Wed May 10 1989 11:20 | 7 |
| Unknown at this time. I added mine right next to the existing one.
But I am not comfortable that it is working correctly yet. (see
previous reply).
cheers,
jeff
|
131.30 | an elaborate home-brew | HEFTY::TENEROWICZT | | Wed May 10 1989 12:21 | 20 |
| The best smoke system I've seen was in NY state. The guy was running
a .60 sized engine and installed a water cooling jacket to the head
of the engine. The fuel for the smoke was feed into one side of
the jacket and extracted on the other side adjacent to the muffler.
He then had a copper tubing that he ran from the header end of the
muffler inside the muffler to app. 1" from the exhaust end of the
muffler. The end at the header end protruded outside and picked
uo the heated fuel from the jacket attached to the cylinder. At
the end of the copper tubing near the exhaust end of the muffler
he had a piece of the copper tubing bent over the open end of the
copper tubing. Much like the enlement of a spark plug. As the heated
fuel came out of the copper tubing it hit the piece of metal and
was atomised. With the fuel heated to such a degree and the atomization
the burning of the fuel was intense. He commented that the systems
that dump the fuel into the muffler at the header of the muffler
have a problem with the fuel being sucked back into the cylinder
of the engine. All I know is that this worked mint.
Tom
|
131.31 | Care for a smoke? | ICICLE::SOUTIERE | | Thu Jan 25 1990 09:10 | 13 |
| Lets re-awaken this topic.
Now that the MUNK is flying I want to pursue the smoke system again.
ALMAG cutting oil was suggested as the smoke mixture, but I just
called a Texaco dealer and he said he can only get it in 55 gallon
quantities which costs $250. Does anyone know where to get this in
5 gallon quantities?
I've also got a Perry oscillating pump....is this strong enough to
pump the oil into the muffler? I plan on mounting it on the fire-
wall....would it vibrate enough there?
Ken
|
131.32 | Mounting Perry Osc. Pump... | GALVIA::ECULLEN | think twice, ... cut once ! | Thu Jan 25 1990 09:45 | 20 |
| <<< Note 131.31 by ICICLE::SOUTIERE >>>
> I've also got a Perry oscillating pump....is this strong enough to
> pump the oil into the muffler? I plan on mounting it on the fire-
> wall....would it vibrate enough there?
Ken, I would mount it in the arc of the prop attached to the engine if
possible so that you get the maximum ability of the pump. They
recommend direct attachment to the engine, rather than involving the
damping effect of mounting it off the engine on the firewall. But then
if the pump was an afterthought one doesn't always have the space. Thats
when the fun starts...
I am, like youself, setting up a smoke system. I have a question
related to the size of tank that would be adequate to hold the smoke
producing oil - 2oz,4oz,...? - any recommendations ?
Regards,
Eric();
|
131.33 | | VTCOWS::SOUTIERE | | Thu Jan 25 1990 10:18 | 13 |
| Eric,
I plan on using a 4oz. tank (since it is all I have
available). Granted it won't give me alot of smoke time, but
enough to make a few good passes. Again, looks like we'll have
to expirement.
The location of the pump is another trial and error
thing. Maybe I'll glue it to the cowl! It'll surely get some
vibration there.
Do you have a switching device yet?
Ken
|
131.34 | Dubro valve | GALVIA::ECULLEN | think twice, ... cut once ! | Thu Jan 25 1990 11:27 | 22 |
| > Do you have a switching device yet?
Hi Ken,
Yes, I got the Dubro (spelling?) valve. Its OK I guess.
The valve allows two tubes to be shut off by rotating the arm which
pinches the tubes. They supply a good length of rubber tubing. If I
recall they also supply the nipples to fit into the back of the
crankcase, and other bits & pieces.
They recommend that you lubricate the pinch mechanism - mine is really
tight. I hope it will loosen up (haven't lubricated it yet) as the
servo will have a job pulling & pushing otherwise.
As you said, a bit of experimentation will get something working.
I hope to run in the engine and then try the smoke system on it soon.
Regards,
Eric();
|
131.35 | | VTCOWS::SOUTIERE | | Thu Jan 25 1990 12:13 | 9 |
| I am using an OS.90FS. It has a drain nipple coming from the back
of the crank case. I don't believe there is much pressure developed
there. I will be using the pump method.
Is there something in the hardware stores that will act as a shutoff
valve? I think I'll take a trip to the pet store (fish section),
they have alot of weird valves.
Ken
|
131.36 | Diesel or #2 fuel oil! | CURIE::ANKER | Anker Berg-Sonne | Fri Jan 26 1990 11:24 | 3 |
| Diesel or regular #2 fuel oil smokes great.
Anker
|
131.37 | Straight up or on the rocks? | ICICLE::SOUTIERE | | Fri Jan 26 1990 13:38 | 10 |
| Anker,
Is the diesel or #2 oil mixed with anything else?
In an older RC catalog, they suggested mixing 1 to 1 diesel
with some Texaco Corvas form oil.
By the way, I am using an 8oz. tank for my smoke fuel.
Ken
|
131.38 | Stright diesel should be fine | CURIE::ANKER | Anker Berg-Sonne | Fri Jan 26 1990 19:51 | 11 |
| Re: <<< Note 131.37 by ICICLE::SOUTIERE >>>
Ken,
I believe straight diesel is just fine. At the back of
my mind there is something, but I'm sure its not any kind of a
risk. It has something to do with the density of smoke vs
consumption. Anoth wonderful smoke generating fluid is power
steering fluid.
Anker
|
131.39 | Copies of smoke system article available | AKOV11::CAVANAGH | R/C planes..The bigger the better! | Fri Feb 02 1990 15:19 | 8 |
|
If anyone is interested, I have copies of the Sept. 1987 RCM article by
Chuck Cunningham that talks all about smoke systems and has some illustrations
of different set-ups.
If you want a copy send me a VAXmail with you mail stop.
Jim
|
131.40 | More Smoker Questions | SELL3::MARRONE | | Fri Nov 20 1992 13:11 | 26 |
| I'm getting ready to put a smoker in the Extra 300. I have several
questions that I could not find answers for in this note.
First, where do you mount the tank for the smoke fluid? Seems to me
its best to put it at or close to the CG to prevent changing the
balance as the fluid gets used up.
Second, what kind of tank do you use for the fluid? Is it the same as
used for glow fuel, or the ones used for gasoline? I would think that
most of the fluids capable of being used for smoke are petroleum based,
and therefore would be in the same category as gasoline.
Third, what are the pros and cons of using a pressure tap from the
crankcase vs. a pump to pressurize the smoker tank? I have heard two
stories on this. One says that crankcase pressure will work, but won't
give you lots of smoke, therefore use a pump. Others have told me the
crankcase pressure is going to be more than enough.
Finally, how do you arrange the filler for the smoke fluid? Is it done
like the fuel tank, or are there some special ways to set up the
plumbing?
I'd appreciate any of the collective wisdom out there on this subject.
Thanks,
Joe
|
131.41 | May Be Some Help | LEDS::WATT | | Mon Nov 23 1992 17:02 | 16 |
| Joe,
I have looked into smoke systems and have purchased a pump and tank
from B&D. You do need a tank and fittings made for gasoline. No
silicone tubing! Some people use muffler pressure and a check valve
but many use either an electric or engine driven pump. The pump I
bought runs off of the variable crankcase pressure of a 2-stroke. I
intend to use it with a Zenoah G-38 but I can't fit the stuff in my
Ultra-Hots easily so it's sitting in a box. To get good smoke, you
need good fluid flow and some sort of preheat coil to get it hot
enough. The best results I've seen were with a Gas burning engine -
high exhaust temperature. The smoke tank can be set up just like a
fuel tank for filling.
Charlie
|
131.42 | Great Information | SELL1::MARRONE | | Tue Nov 24 1992 12:40 | 29 |
| Re: -.1
Charlie, thanks for the very useful information.
I started the smoke installation by mounting the Dubro smoke switch and
its servo behind the firewall. Plenty of room in there, but as luck
would have it, the servo _just_ touches the wing when it is bolted in
place. I don't know if this will be a problem or not. It doesn't seem
to represent any danger to the wing or the servo, so I may leave it the
way it is.
I decided to mount the smoke tank on the CG. This will require a tank
about 1" thick and about 4"x6" along the other two dimensions laying on
its side under the servo tray. I'm not sure there is such a thing
commercially available, but I will try to find one close to these
dimensions. The square configuration won't fit anywhere.
For starters, I'm going with the direct crankcase pressure method. If
this proves unsatisfactory, I can add a pump later. However, the idea
of drilling and tapping the crankcase cover seems like a "violation" of
the tight-fitting, gasketed and sealed engine chamber, and if it
weren't for the fact that this is standard operating procedure, I would
have major reservations about doing this. I won't argue with success.
The rest of the Extra 300 is coming along just fine. This is a very
nice kit.
Regards,
Joe
|
131.43 | Make One With Fiberglass | DV780::BEATTY | | Tue Nov 24 1992 17:19 | 10 |
| I have a similar problem with fitting a tank into a smaller Chipmunk.
I bought a sheet of blue styrofoam at the lumber yard the other day and
am going to try making a small tank with a fairly peculiar shape by
overlaying the foam with fiberglass and epoxy and then melting the foam
out with gasoline when it cures.
Does anybody know if a .46 motor runs hot enough exhaust to make smoke
with?
Will
|
131.44 | Just What The Doctor Ordered!!! | CIVIC::MARRONE | | Mon Nov 30 1992 17:47 | 22 |
| I was in Tom's Hobby Korner the other day looking at all the fuel tank
configurations, when lo and behold, I spotted a tank that was exactly
what I was looking for. It is 1 3/4 high with a rectangular shape of
about 4" x 6". I've never seen this before in any of the catalogs or
trade mags, so I asked what it was for. Nobody in the shop knew, and
Tom wasn't there. As it turns out, it is a speed boat tank, made to
fit inside a low-profile hull and sit right on the centerline of the
hull. In fact the bottom of the tank is gently sloped from each side
to the center just like a hull. Dubro refers to it as the VEE TANK
line.
Well, its already fitted into the fuse and it went in beautifully.
Right on the CG! Turned out to be a neat installation. An with 16 oz
of capacity, I should be able to get considerable duration from this
smoker.
I'm takin' my time with this baby so it comes out right. Maiden flight
sometime in the spring of 1993.
Regards,
Joe
|