T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
517.1 | | SSDEVO::HUGHES | NOTE, learn, and inwardly digest | Wed May 04 1988 20:03 | 5 |
| Re .0:
I have always imagined that YOG[H]URT was an onomatopoeic word,
descriptive of the sound that accompanies tipping the substance
out of its container and into a dish ...
|
517.2 | | 45384::BADMAN | Laugh ? I almost did. | Thu May 05 1988 12:58 | 10 |
|
GLOBULE
|
517.3 | obfuscation | PAMOLA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Thu May 05 1988 14:28 | 0 |
517.4 | Productionisation | AYOV27::ISMITH | See those shores! What shores? | Thu May 05 1988 14:49 | 4 |
| This word has been appearing more and more on project progress memos
around here. I hate it.
Ian.
|
517.5 | canonical | GRNDAD::STONE | Roy | Thu May 05 1988 16:17 | 1 |
| ...in the context discussed in earlier notes.
|
517.6 | phlegmatic | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | showtime, Synergy... | Fri May 06 1988 16:43 | 1 |
|
|
517.7 | Awesome! | RICKS::SATOW | | Fri May 06 1988 17:56 | 3 |
| . . . particularly when used as an adverb.
Clay
|
517.8 | Puss | HOMSIC::DUDEK | It's a Bowser eat Bowser world | Fri May 06 1988 18:45 | 1 |
|
|
517.9 | Ah the songs of youth... | PSTJTT::TABER | Reach out and whack someone | Fri May 06 1988 19:27 | 6 |
| > -< Puss >-
Puss? Like "Puss In Boots?" Or did you mean pus? (As in "All-purpose
porpoise pus"?)
>>>==>PStJTT
|
517.10 | how about "like" | MERLAN::JOHNSON | | Fri May 06 1988 21:59 | 2 |
| Otherwise intelligent people seem to say it in like the wrong part
of a sentence. It drives me nuts!
|
517.11 | | AKOV11::BOYAJIAN | Monsters from the Id | Sat May 07 1988 11:53 | 5 |
| re:.9 re:.8
He must be a cat-hater. :-)
--- jerry
|
517.14 | Several least favourite words | HERON::BUCHANAN | a man, a plan, a canal: Suez | Sun May 08 1988 16:44 | 28 |
| Various least favourite words:
(1) Whatever is the natural enemy of the halibut (see Favourite Word Note)
unless it's another fish.
(2) TODAY. I have a mild, intermittent stammer, and I find 'today' the most
difficult word to say. It's tough to change the dentals.
(3) YES. The 2nd most difficult word for me to say is 'No'. But boy do I
regret uttering 'Yes' sometimes.
But if I was asked to pick my alltime most unsavoury nastiest least pleasant
word it would be...
(4) RATKING
Meaning given after the next formfeed. Do not read if you are about to eat
or have just eaten. I feel bilious just contemplating it again.
It is a freakish naturally-occuring phenomenon, consisting of a number of dead
rats (up to a dozen) with their tails knotted together. It is thought that
this accident occurs during winter when rats are crowded together in a nest
for warmth. And once the knot is formed, the more the rats pull...
Ugh!
|
517.15 | functionality | BISTRO::WATSON | Long-term Omelas resident | Mon May 09 1988 15:06 | 6 |
| I am quite willing to delete this reply on the grounds that it isn't
a word. But I hear it too often.
(Is it possible to write-lock a note against descriptive linguistics?)
Andrew.
|
517.16 | Wicked! | GRNDAD::STONE | Roy | Mon May 09 1988 16:29 | 3 |
| In line with .7:
...as when used in, "We had a wicked good time!."
|
517.17 | formfeeds anyone? | ERASER::KALLIS | loose ships slip slips. | Mon May 09 1988 17:09 | 17 |
| Re .14:
Formfeed response:
>It is a freakish naturally-occuring phenomenon, consisting of a number of dead
>rats (up to a dozen) with their tails knotted together. It is thought that
>this accident occurs during winter when rats are crowded together in a nest
>for warmth. And once the knot is formed, the more the rats pull...
Actually, "rat kings" (two words, ordinarily) are more usually found
alive, or even semi-alive. The tails may be pasrtially fused together
by frozen waste products. For those with a cultural bent, The "mouse
king" or "king of the mice" in the ballet _The Nutcracker_, is just
a scaled down rat king. But this is seldom explained, making the
action involved rather puzzling to a lot of folks.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
517.18 | humble rat pie | HERON::BUCHANAN | a man, a plan, a canal: Suez | Tue May 10 1988 22:15 | 4 |
| Steve Kallis, Jr is of course completely right. However, I am an exile
from my land, and far from my encyclopedic resource.
|
517.19 | more on the kings | MARKER::KALLIS | loose ships slip slips. | Fri May 13 1988 21:08 | 26 |
| Re .18:
The following might be a little icky, so a formfeed warning:
A little more on rat kings:
Are you sure you want to know this?
Well, if you are:
How did a fused-together bunch of rats get such a bizzarre name?
In popular mythology, there was supposed to be a gigantic rat that
was king of all rats. And just as some ancient Oriental potentates
were supposed to have (human) servants who acted as footstools,
the king of the rats was supposed to have a footstool composed of
his subjects (how the rat was supposed to sit properly to use it
was never made clear). When the bunches of rats were first discovered,
the comon folk thought they might represent the footstools for the
King of the Rats, and they were called something on the order of
the "Rat King's footstool." In time, the qualification was dropped,
and the "object" took on the name "rat king."
Large rat kings of well over a dozen rats have been reported.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
517.20 | A couple off the top of my head | FRAGLE::PARTINGTON | The early worm gets caught | Fri May 27 1988 15:34 | 5 |
| Least favorite words.....hmmm
CAUCUS: Sounds like something sick people cough up.
PAPAL: I don't know why, I just don't like it.
|
517.21 | too right | HERON::BUCHANAN | a man, a plan, a canal: Suez | Sun May 29 1988 18:20 | 9 |
| > Least favorite words.....hmmm
>
> CAUCUS: Sounds like something sick people cough up.
On a related theme, I am spectacularly unfond of:
GUBERNATORIAL
(*so* ugly)
|
517.22 | Another.... | IOSG::VICKERS | Entropy isn't what it used to be | Tue May 31 1988 12:45 | 5 |
|
I really hate the 'word' GUESSTIMATE. After all, what is an estimate
if not an educated guess ?
Paul V
|
517.23 | creative usage | MARKER::KALLIS | Don't confuse `want' and `need.' | Tue May 31 1988 15:55 | 13 |
| Re .21:
> On a related theme, I am spectacularly unfond of:
>
>GUBERNATORIAL
Red Skelton, the comic, was the only person to handle this word
properly. One time, when politics was in full swing, he said:
"I plan to enter the gubernatorial race. I'd really like to be
your next goober."
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
517.24 | dropped out of grade school | BLURB::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue May 31 1988 16:25 | 7 |
| re: .22
A guesstimate isn't even educated. It's just being made by
someone who has the authority to include it in a marketing plan
and make the rest of us live by it.
--bonnie
|
517.25 | Worse yet | LOV::LASHER | Working... | Tue May 31 1988 17:25 | 9 |
| Re: .22, .24 ("guesstimate")
There is a distinction, although a slight one, between "guess" and
"estimate" that is blurred by "guesstimate." A guess can be more
or less random, but an estimate is supposed to be a rational
approximation. The legal consequences are that estimates are admissible
in evidence but guesses are not.
Lew Lasher
|
517.26 | Aaargghhh ! | IOSG::VICKERS | Entropy isn't what it used to be | Tue May 31 1988 17:54 | 10 |
|
re .last
Exactly, if a guesstimate is a more or less random selection, they
why on earth bother inventing a word when "guess" will do. It is,
to me at least, just a really horrible word which should be the
first up against the wall along with its inventor when the revolution
comes if not sooner.
Paul V
|
517.27 | Maybe sixth or seventh | ERIS::CALLAS | Mr. Tamzen | Tue May 31 1988 19:15 | 7 |
| re .26:
It's my opinion that whatever invented "iconify," "iconize," and their
relatives is in line ahead of the inventor of "guesstimate." At least
"guesstimate" is witty, being an eliding portmanteau.
Jon
|
517.28 | more random and less random | BLURB::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue May 31 1988 20:15 | 15 |
| re: .26
The distinction appears to be that a guess is more random and
the guesstimate is less random. It compares to the "educated
guess" I used to get from professors who didn't know the answer
to a tough question.
I like the humor of guesstinate, especially when it's used
by a management type who doesn't notice that he's just said
his own numbers are meaningless.
Incidentally, this is the first time I can remember seeing
"guesstimate" written down.
--bonnie
|
517.29 | Hurrumph. | IOSG::VICKERS | Entropy isn't what it used to be | Wed Jun 01 1988 12:00 | 9 |
|
> the guesstimate is less random. It compares to the "educated
> guess" I used to get from professors who didn't know the answer
And what is an estimate if not an educated guess ? Again I can see
no justification for this pseudo word.
Paul V
groan grumble gripe spit.... :-)
|
517.30 | you can be legally held to an estimate | BLURB::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Wed Jun 01 1988 16:40 | 26 |
| An estimate has a whole lot more behind it than an educated guess.
If you're a wallpaper contractor, or a painter, or an auto
repairman, and you give a customer an estimate, you had better
come in with a bill that's at or below that estimate or else have
an awfully good excuse. Many states have laws requiring that if
the cost of completing the work is going to run over the estimate,
you get the customer's approval before you do it.
Flagging something as a guesstimate tells your listeners that,
while your predictions are your best-faith appraisal of how much
time, money, or whatever it's going to take, you could be wildly
wrong and you are not responsible for the discrepency. This is
considerably more than a guess and considerably less than an
estimate.
This shade of meaning justifies it as management jargon. It warns
you about how much credibility you can savely give the numbers.
And since it has a shade of meaning that really isn't covered by
any existing terms, and since that shade of meaning is often
important in relations among people who have the power to commit
to schedules and budgets, it will probably be around for a while.
But until and unless it does hang around, I wouldn't use it in a
memo, spec, or proposal.
--bonnie
|
517.31 | RATchet | IAMOK::BELL | dtn 273-3217 VRO5-2/D6 | Wed Jun 01 1988 20:47 | 7 |
|
Which is a quarter of an inch longer than a MOUSEshit.
|
517.32 | | YIPPEE::LIRON | | Thu Jun 02 1988 23:16 | 12 |
| thanatophidia
heldentenor
eczematous
gutturalize
serpiginous
bursiculate
fissiparous
pallesthesia
monomachy
edentulate
lemniscate
weddellite
|
517.33 | | VAXWRK::CONNOR | On no! Not Another Light Bulb Joke | Mon Jun 06 1988 17:49 | 9 |
| Synergy - overused and trite.
Tax - of any sort
Budget - takes the fun out of life
-wise - Madison Ave Nightmare
Firmup - Your turn at the Nautalis
|
517.34 | systemantics rides again! | HERON::BUCHANAN | nihilistic technofetishist | Mon Jun 06 1988 17:52 | 5 |
| > Synergy - overused and trite.
Agreed. No what we *do* need is an antonym. Something to cover the much
commoner case when the whole is *less* than the sum of the parts.
Any suggestions?
|
517.35 | it's okay if used properly | ERASER::KALLIS | Don't confuse `want' and `need.' | Mon Jun 06 1988 18:39 | 6 |
| Re .34:
"Asynergy," of course. And "asynergistic" for the adjective. Just
like "symmetry," wouldn't you say?
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
517.36 | Beware an English Estimate... | JANUS::CROWLE | On a clear disk you can seek forever | Wed Jun 08 1988 14:55 | 8 |
| Re .30, English law (if I understand it correctly) allows a contractor
to present a bill which exceeds his estimate by a "reasonable" amount,
without necessarily having to justify it. If you want to be sure
that you're not going to have to pay out more than a known amount,
you get a "quotation", which the contractor has to stick to. Needless
to say, quotations tend to be higher than estimates.
brian
|
517.37 | Rien ne se perd | YIPPEE::LIRON | | Wed Jun 08 1988 15:09 | 9 |
| re .28
> Incidentally, this is the first time I can remember seeing
> "guesstimate" written down.
Perhaps you weren't around at that time, but it was actually
written in Joyoflex 308.2.
roger
|
517.38 | A HAIRY EXPERIENCE | SEAPEN::PHIPPS | Mike @DTN 225-4959 | Thu Jul 28 1988 01:50 | 4 |
| DEPILATORY
When I'm at home, commercials for these and other similar
products always air just when I'm about to eat.
|
517.39 | Word Pain. | THEONE::PARSONS | So many notes, so little time..... | Thu Jul 28 1988 10:58 | 6 |
| There's a few words that make my flesh creep, but for some reason
the one that really makes me bounce a brick off the TV screen is...
IRREGARDLESS ...... aaaaarrrrgggghhhhhh!!!!!! here I go again!!!
BTW What is the cost of replacing a VAXstation screen?
Regards, Guy
|
517.40 | why I don't have an annoying word any more | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Thu Jul 28 1988 17:43 | 12 |
| re: .38
I noticed this phenomenon, too. I think it must be a corollary
of Murphy's law.
I have, however, found a way around it.
I turn the TV off . . .
Protects me from all kinds of idiocies.
--bonnie
|
517.41 | Dumb, di dumb, dumb! | DSSDEV::STONE | Roy | Fri Jul 29 1988 00:21 | 7 |
| Re: .39
[Guy, please don't press return, I'm going to use that word again...]
IRREGARDLESS and ORIENTATE both fall into the same category. They
are good negative indicators of educational level.
|
517.42 | | THEONE::PARSONS | So many notes, so little time..... | Fri Jul 29 1988 10:50 | 1 |
| Do I get a better price? I've now got two to fix! ....Guy
|
517.43 | Any coincidence is occidental | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | Jeff Goodenough, IED/Reading UK | Fri Jul 29 1988 13:22 | 3 |
| But is it oriented or orientated? And does it mean "pointing east"?
Jeff.
|
517.44 | all points east | MARVIN::KNOWLES | the teddy-bears have their nit-pick | Mon Aug 01 1988 14:57 | 11 |
| Yep. East is where everyone wanted to go in those days. An American
who lost his way when told `Go West, young man' was disoccidented
- but the word never caught on.
The Portugese, who did a lot of navigating (and so risked losing
their bearings more often than other people) have got two words
for the same thing: `des_orient_ar' and `des_norte_ar'.
Note: the second para is true.
b
|
517.45 | Who'll administer those who administrate? | DSSDEV::CANTOR | Dave C. | Tue Aug 02 1988 06:57 | 5 |
| re .41
I think ADMINISTRATE falls into that category, too.
Dave C.
|
517.46 | Least favorite? Have many - here are two. | REORG::CHESSER | | Wed Oct 26 1988 15:45 | 5 |
| proactive (used as an antonym to reactive) and irregardless (ooooophf,
even cringe to type it).
Susan
|
517.47 | 'Disambiguate' | DDIF::CANTOR | Logout and hit break. | Sun Feb 19 1989 05:55 | 5 |
| 'Disambiguate' drives me nuts. I haven't yet heard or seen this used
where either 'distinguish,' 'define,' or 'clarify' wouldn't convey the
proper meaning.
Dave C.
|
517.48 | | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Sun Feb 19 1989 06:15 | 1 |
| You could start the Antidisambiguation Society.
|
517.49 | avoid multivalence, please | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Mon Feb 20 1989 11:24 | 4 |
|
Antidisambiguation? Sounds ambivalent.
Richard.
|
517.50 | Some Pet Hates | CLARID::TURNBULL | Another Computerised Junk Note! | Tue Mar 07 1989 10:40 | 74 |
| This note has been transferred from the grammar conference (Ref: 143.*) as it
seemed more appropriate here in Joy of Lex.
================================================================================
Some of my pet hates in general computer texts and marketing documents are
listed below. Please note that I am referring only to general texts, not
detailed technical documents where the reader might be expected to understand
the specialized meanings of some of these words.
"-ize" words For example, productize.
"addressed" Often over-used.
"advisories" In the context where I found it, used to mean examples.
"blueprint" For any plan or scheme.
"bottleneck" For any sort of problem.
"concatenation" For any act of joining or merging.
"criteria" Often over-used for principles, standards, or guidelines.
"deadline" When used for any sort of limit.
"deliverables" When used to refer to software, documentation, and so on.
"domain" For any area or topic.
"end-user" For user.
"environment" For area or location.
"escalate" For refer or pass on.
"evolution" For any change or development
"functionality" For features or functions.
"impact" For affect or effect.
"implement" For install, carry out, or fulfill.
"initiate" For start or begin.
"input" and "output" When used as verbs, or when used metaphorically.
"integrate" For combine or mix.
"interface" For any sort of boundary, interaction, or relationship among
individuals or groups.
"logistics" For any requirements.
"maximum" For greatest or most
"methodologies" For methods.
"metrics" For statistics or data.
"migration" For change or update.
"minimum" For least or smallest.
"offerings" For services or products.
"on-going" For continuing.
"on/off-line" For available/unavailable.
"optimization" For any improvement.
"optimum" For best.
"orientation" For training or briefing.
"parameter" When used to mean boundary, limit, or framework.
"peripheral" When used figuratively.
"positioned" As in, "This service is positioned in the networking space."
"resources" For any materials or people.
"solution" Have you noticed how everything is becoming one of these?
"space" For any area of interest or involvement.
"start up" For start.
"tangibles" When used to mean documentation, programs, and so on.
"target" For any aim, objective, or goal.
"terminate" For end or finish.
"topology" For configuration.
"transmitted" For sent.
"utilization" For use or usage.
"utilize" For use.
Regards, Greg.
|
517.51 | Front-form??? | AYOV27::ISMITH | Tauro-Scatological Expletive | Tue Mar 07 1989 13:49 | 12 |
| .50�< Note 517.50 by CLARID::TURNBULL "Another Computerised Junk Note!" >
.50� -< Some Pet Hates >-
.50�
.50�"escalate" For refer or pass on.
^^^^^^^^^^
This word is apparently a rather nasty (and quite recent)
back-formation from 'escalator'. Perhaps we could front-form it
out of existence?
Ian.
|
517.52 | %MODE-DATE-INCOMPATIB, 'FRONT_FORM' not possible today | IJSAPL::ELSENAAR | Fractal of the universe | Tue Mar 07 1989 15:37 | 11 |
| RE -1
> (.....).Perhaps we could front-form it
> out of existence? ^^^^^^^^^^
Sorry Ian. Not today. I'm not in front-forming mode.
:-)
Arie
|
517.53 | | SEEK::HUGHES | Thus thru Windows call on us(Donne) | Tue Mar 07 1989 18:57 | 7 |
| I think that this is a personal weakness: I know that many people -- and
even my favorite Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary -- find it acceptable,
but I have a deep aversion to the word _onto_.
Used in the sense of _on to_, that is, and not as a prefix: "ontological".
Jim ... expatriate_Brit_suffering_from_ontophobia.
|
517.54 | ontophobia | MARVIN::KNOWLES | the teddy-bears have their nit-pick | Thu Mar 09 1989 14:22 | 12 |
| Re .-1
Good word. Presumably ontophobia is the fear of things that are.
So, as long as some authority (like a reasonable dictionary) reports
something as being a word, the fear of that word [which needn't be
`onto'] is ontophobia.
Personally, I have an aversion to the tacking of suffixes onto
any old word to make a new one, but that's just a personal prejudice -
phobophobia, perhaps.
b
|
517.55 | Winnie had it... | PSTJTT::TABER | The call of the mild | Thu Mar 09 1989 17:36 | 5 |
| > ...phobophobia, perhaps.
I thought that was when you had nothing to fear but fear itself.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
517.56 | �� | MARVIN::MACHIN | | Thu Mar 09 1989 17:53 | 5 |
| RE: ontophobia
Speaking as a metaontophobic, I find this discussion disturbing.
Richard.
|
517.57 | | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Thu Mar 09 1989 19:26 | 6 |
| Re: .55
No, I think phobophobia is where you have everything to fear - except
perhaps fear itself -- or the fear of fear itself...
Bernie
|
517.58 | | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Thu Mar 09 1989 21:29 | 1 |
| Ugh. I'm becoming "phobophobia" phobic.
|
517.59 | note-wise! | MILLER::TURNBULL | PrecipiteVolissimeVolmente | Fri Mar 10 1989 15:47 | 3 |
| RE: .50, I forgot to add "-wise" to my list.
Greg.
|
517.60 | Concretized chaoticization | CRLVMS::TREESE | Win Treese, Cambridge Research Lab | Sat Mar 11 1989 09:04 | 12 |
| Here's a couple of "-ize" words:
Heard at a Digital-sponsored Technology Forum in Australia:
"concretize"
Heard on NOVA (documentary on chaotic dynamical systems):
"chaoticize"
I'm only guessing at the spelling of the second one...
- Win
|
517.61 | | VAXWRK::CONNOR | We are amused | Thu Mar 23 1989 22:12 | 3 |
| Neo-
adjusted - as in the price/premium will be adjusted
|
517.62 | Most Popular Least Popular Words | SHALOT::ANDERSON | Give me a U, give me a T... | Fri May 19 1989 00:31 | 10 |
| From The Literary Life and Other Curiosities, Robert
Hendrickson, Penguin, 1982 ... According to a poll taken
by the National Association of Teachers of Speech in 1946,
the ten least popular words are: cacophony, crunch,
flatulent, gripe, jazz, phlegmatic, plump, plutocrat,
sap, and treachery.
As for me, I've always had a soft spot for phlegm.
-- Cliff
|
517.63 | crapulence | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Mon May 22 1989 02:02 | 1 |
| That over-stuffed feeling after you've eaten too much?
|
517.64 | Pulchritude | BLAS03::FORBES | Bill Forbes - LDP Engrng | Mon May 22 1989 19:13 | 6 |
| An ugly word that means "beauty."
When giving a compliment or describing an attractive individual, what
good is a word that makes you want to brush your teeth?
Bill
|
517.65 | Worse still | MARVIN::KNOWLES | Running old protocol | Tue May 23 1989 15:37 | 7 |
| � When giving a compliment or describing an attractive individual,
you'd be more likely to use the even nastier `pulchritudinous' (adj),
wouldn't you?
b
|
517.66 | A slight rathole, but... | CURRNT::PREECE | A keyboard ! How quaint. | Tue May 23 1989 17:41 | 13 |
|
The famous seaside retirement town of Bournemouth, where I spent
my formative, has, as its motto, beneath an appallingly contrived
shield, the words "Pulchritudo et Salubritas". *
I had to walk under this shield every morning, at school, so the
very mention of the word Pulchritude (or even "Salubrity"?) gives
me the shudders, not just because it's a nasty word in its own right.
Ian
* "Beauty and Health"
|
517.67 | | NSDC::RATCLIFF | Heisenberg may have been here | Thu Sep 07 1989 15:10 | 7 |
| two ugly (non-)verbs I've seen recently in memos:
" so as to better program-manage the..."
(+10 malus points for split infinitive)
" decided that they would not DECproductize it."
(emphasis theirs)
John.
|
517.68 | | NSDC::RATCLIFF | Heisenberg may have been here | Thu Sep 14 1989 12:11 | 3 |
| In a recent DIS journal, the process of assetizing is described...
|
517.69 | | STAR::RDAVIS | The Man Without Quantities | Sat Mar 10 1990 20:52 | 7 |
| I can't believe I'm about to type this...
Normalcy
Ugh! It felt even worse than I expected.
Ray
|
517.70 | | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | Heavy_Metal power - 240 watts!! | Tue Mar 13 1990 18:39 | 5 |
|
I never liked "doily".
Shawn L.
|
517.71 | | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Tue Mar 13 1990 19:17 | 5 |
| > I never liked "doily".
I suppose that makes you antimacassar.
Bernie
|
517.72 | darn it! | LESCOM::KALLIS | Pumpkins -- Nature's greatest gift. | Tue Mar 13 1990 20:12 | 9 |
| Re .71 (Bernie):
>> I never liked "doily".
>
>I suppose that makes you antimacassar.
Or at least crewel.
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
517.73 | | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Tue Mar 13 1990 22:00 | 3 |
| Now that's tit for tat!
Bernie
|
517.74 | work | MACNAS::DKEATING | Shake a Shamrock in Italia'90 | Wed Mar 14 1990 11:09 | 1 |
|
|
517.75 | and I can do all of them, too | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Wed Mar 14 1990 14:13 | 5 |
| re: .70 - .73
You guys sure are crotchety today . . .
--bonnie
|
517.76 | A stitch in time | SEAPEN::PHIPPS | | Wed Mar 14 1990 18:41 | 4 |
| Now Bonnie! Don't needle
them to make your point.
Mike
|
517.77 | | DECWET::GETSINGER | Eric Getsinger | Thu Mar 15 1990 02:18 | 1 |
| I'm glad that these responses have a common thread!
|
517.78 | Common time | KLEINE::KEOGH | Personal Name | Thu Mar 15 1990 11:30 | 5 |
| re: .75
> You guys sure are crotchety today . . .
Such mild criticism will hardly make them quaver!
|
517.79 | Any other purls of wisdom? | GLIVET::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Thu Mar 15 1990 12:37 | 0 |
517.80 | I hope this interchange is knitting us together | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Thu Mar 15 1990 16:45 | 1 |
|
|
517.81 | continuing the thread... | COOKIE::DEVINE | Bob Devine, CXN | Thu Mar 15 1990 23:07 | 6 |
| Sew, is this the start of sewing puns? That's something
I can cotton to. As much as I try to control myself,
puns twill emerge. I'm knot lying.
Butt-on another topic, such pun'sleave me in stitches although
some are so bad they should be put in a sew-er. They're the worsted.
|
517.82 | | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | Heavy_Metal power - 240 watts!! | Fri Mar 16 1990 16:18 | 8 |
|
Button it up, eh?
There's not a thread of intelligence in these replies.
Shawn L.
|
517.83 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Here today and here again tomorrow | Fri Mar 16 1990 16:49 | 9 |
| Call the Cavalry back from Jersey to-knit-e for the king has satin some mud.
The queen has been silking about all day, she needs a serge of energy.
The knave was a broadcloth they deported him for lithping. The princesses
poly and ester cordoroy-al cold. The youngest prince was playing with his gun,
but he layed a ray on the nurse, den'im went to bed. The chauffeur was changing
the oil in the royal limmo and declared, "this oil is too viscose, I'll have
to change to a synthetic"
And so it was for the royals as we bring another bad pun to a clothes.
|
517.84 | | SSDEVO::GOLDSTEIN | | Sat Mar 17 1990 00:06 | 4 |
| I think I see a pattern in all of this. You may think it's all the
vogue, but I think you're embroidering the truth.
Bernie
|
517.85 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Here today and here again tomorrow | Mon Mar 19 1990 17:47 | 1 |
| We are all hostiches to fashion!
|
517.86 | A hem! On the topic we should stay! | GLIVET::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Mon Mar 19 1990 19:14 | 0 |
517.87 | pressing my luck | TLE::RANDALL | living on another planet | Mon Mar 19 1990 22:22 | 3 |
| Why are we being so crewel to one another?
--b
|
517.88 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Here today and here again tomorrow | Tue Mar 20 1990 17:29 | 5 |
| > Why are we being so crewel to one another?
Yeah, it's leaving me in tat ters
|
517.89 | k1p1k2tog psso | UILA::WHORLOW | Venturers do it in the bush | Fri Mar 30 1990 06:40 | 13 |
|
Ahhhh it's enough to stop one interfacing....
One more and we'll end up on the rick-rack, but to one side, due to a
bias-binding, no doubt.
ohhh I'd better slipstitch away before someone tells me to
get knitted............
derek
|
517.90 | | TKOV51::DIAMOND | This note is illegal tender. | Wed Apr 04 1990 11:10 | 17 |
| Gee, all you guys hate puns? "LEAST" favorite words. What a bunch
of spoilsports! I like puns!
However, I once wanted to throw a dictionary through the window,
when I found "orientate" in it. And another one had "administrate."
Incredible.
Well, in the old days, when rubbers were worn on feet, I disliked
the word "rubbers" for them, preferring "boots." Somehow other
uses of "rubber" did not bother me, and in fact for its modern
meaning, maybe it is even preferable to its synonyms.
Oh, let's see. How about "backup"?
How about "leftovers"?
Maybe "dentist"?
|
517.91 | Isn't it obvious? | CSG001::MILLER | Ubi dubium, ibi libertas | Wed Apr 04 1990 20:01 | 2 |
| I have always hated OBVIOUSLY, because I hear it as an egotistical
attitude towards one's listeners.
|
517.92 | more on obvious | SSDEVO::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Wed Apr 04 1990 20:44 | 6 |
| The two expressions from MIT that were a sure sign of some ungodly
obscure hair about to be perpetrated on the students were:
1. "It's intuitively obvious to the most casual observer."
2. ... the demonstration "is left as an exercise for the reader."
|