T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2313.1 | Volvo drivers! | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Wed Sep 21 1994 15:05 | 10 |
|
You've had Volvo drivers not see you, I've had the oposite problem my
last accident was a lady driver of 30mumblish in a Volvo 240 who saw me
indicate left (when I didn't) and pulled out right in front of me in
the wet, I hit the brakes but it was too late I had the choice of
hitting her! or pulling across the road into oncoming traffic, so I hit
her car!
But my wife used to drive a Volvo (but she's alright now)
Richard
|
2313.2 | | VANGA::KERRELL | Hakuna matata! | Wed Sep 21 1994 15:27 | 15 |
| re.0:
Of course owning and driving a Volvo does not make you a bad driver. My last
three accidents were:-
1 Volvo crossed centre of road and rammed my car in the side (he claimed faulty
brakes but was proved to be at fault).
2 Mercedes reversed into me in a car park (note: not a Volvo).
3 Volvo ran in the back of me at a junction.
There, that proves it.
Dave.
|
2313.3 | | WOTVAX::GILLILANDP | Not very Tuna-friendly | Wed Sep 21 1994 17:26 | 7 |
| I can't remember which motorcycle brake part maufacturer it was, but one
of them had an advertisement a few years ago that featured a picture of a
brake disk and underneath it:
"Tested by Volvo drivers"
Phil Gill.
|
2313.4 | | METSYS::ALLEN | That's right, I was bounced. | Wed Sep 21 1994 17:32 | 4 |
| That's almost as bad as those Skoda ads which inform us that they do
proper inspections of their cars now they are owned by VW...
...makes you wonder what they used to do pre-VW?!?!?!?
|
2313.5 | | WOTVAX::GILLILANDP | Not very Tuna-friendly | Wed Sep 21 1994 17:46 | 10 |
| >>That's almost as bad as those Skoda ads which inform us that they do
>>proper inspections of their cars now they are owned by VW...
>>...makes you wonder what they used to do pre-VW?!?!?!?
Err, I think you've missed the point. The ad was a joke, a dig at Volvo
drivers from the motorcycling fraternity who are not the world's
greatest fans of drivers of those cars.
Phil Gill.
|
2313.6 | | METSYS::ALLEN | That's right, I was bounced. | Wed Sep 21 1994 17:51 | 3 |
| So, I'm ratholing?...
...I seem to be good at it!
|
2313.7 | It proves what?? | SUBURB::GINNJ | | Wed Sep 21 1994 18:50 | 15 |
|
Ah yes, but WHAT does it prove?? That two Volvo drivers, out of x
thousand are not good drivers? Perhaps they were the same two that went
into my car.....?
My point was that not ALL Volvo drivers are bad - I drive a Volvo and
I'm GOOD! In fact, when I've previously enquired about insurance for my
car, and asked whether there would be discount for an Advanced Driver's
certificate, I was told that it is already assumed that Volvo drivers
are particulary safe drivers, and that was reflected in the premium!
(yes, really!)
J
|
2313.8 | | FORTY2::TEER | Carnivorous Planet Eating Monster | Wed Sep 21 1994 18:58 | 3 |
| Watch out for drivers who actually think they are good ;-)
Mark
|
2313.9 | Volvo-man | CMOTEC::JASPER | Stuck on the Flypaper of Life | Wed Sep 21 1994 20:22 | 18 |
|
I get the impression that there is one Volvo driver out there who
spends all his time ramming other drivers all over the country & at all
times of day & night. It seems he also rams fellow Volvo driver's cars
as well.
Next time you are involved in an accident with a Volvo Driver, please
take his photograph, then compare it with those taken by other noters.
I think you'll find its the same person who drove a Volvo out of a 1st
floor window. He's made of wood & has a BMW badge where his ear should
be, but he could be wearing a disguise.
Yes, I think that could account for all the horrific Volvo disasters &
hard-luck stories. I saw the advert, Volvo-man definitely walked away
from the accident.
Tony.
|
2313.10 | Help!! | CGOOA::PITULEY | Ain't technology wonderful? | Wed Sep 21 1994 22:20 | 13 |
| I drove a Volvo......once. That was quite enough.
But seriously....here in Calgary, Volvos, particularly the disreputable
looking ones sem to have become the transport of choice for the younger
set (late teens). Most of them are looking a bit run down (the cars,
that is) and I don't suppose they will get much better. All of this
ends up in this statement: I think in this case it will be the cars in
combination with the well known driving abilities of the teen set
(sarcasm here) that will cause the safety problem.
Brian Pituley
|
2313.11 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Thu Sep 22 1994 10:20 | 2 |
| Thank your lucky starts this phantom Volvo driver hasn't found a land
rover yet :-]
|
2313.12 | Why build a car you can drive out the window? | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Thu Sep 22 1994 11:08 | 8 |
|
Of course we all accept that it's not fair to tar everyone with the
same brush, but why do they test drive them out of the top floor of
buildings if they don't expect that sort of thing out of the average
driver? 8^] seem's pretty pointless to me unless you expect people to do
it! 8*)
Richard
|
2313.13 | | WARNUT::ALLEN | It works better if you screw it in.. | Thu Sep 22 1994 11:22 | 19 |
| Jackie
Loved the base note......
I drove my brother-in-law's Volvo around Devon and Cornwall for a week
a few years back, you know down all those single track roads with high
hedges? I have to say that the tank nature of the car does give you a
certain feeling of invincibility which was scary. It's the same with
many BIG cars, Rollers are the same (get out of my way I'm in a Roller
and if you hit me I'll not only do more damage to your rust heap but it
will cost you...) Toyota Land Tanks also spring to mind, the one that
rammed me from behind whilst I was stationary trying not to run over
the guy crossing at a pelican crossing and jumping the red light.
If everyone drove a Panda the roads would be a lot safer (Alan if you're
reading this...except on the M56 going to the airport!) because you would
be scared s------s of having an accident!
Another Allen
|
2313.14 | Why don't we all walk.. now 100 miles a day at 5mph that's..... | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Thu Sep 22 1994 11:43 | 5 |
|
That's why so many Vegetarians drive 2CV's (cos they don't go fast
enough to hurt anything if they hit it!) Do they Royston?
Richard
|
2313.15 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Sep 22 1994 12:04 | 4 |
|
Richard, don't bring me into this.
Royston :-)
|
2313.16 | | WELSWS::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Thu Sep 22 1994 13:08 | 14 |
| I'm sure there are good Volvo drivers, but....
A Capitol Radio phone-in about 5 years ago showed them to be the least
popular drivers in London, worse than black cabs, minicabs and buses.
People were asked why, and the reply was generally to do with driver
arrogance.
My mother was a Volvo driver and knew about the safety features. As
she grew accustomed to the car she became more and more assured of her
immunity from danger. So much so that she'd take frightening risks and
became an unpleasantly, belligerent driver. In the end I took to
manufacturing reasons why I wouldn't be a passenger when she drove -- I
hadn't got the confidence in the immunity of the car and couldn't
handle the embarassment of some of the things she did.
|
2313.17 | Thoughts on Volvos | EICMFG::JOCONNOR | Somebody else did it and ran away. | Thu Sep 22 1994 13:10 | 39 |
| It is true that (in the UK) Volvos are involved in fewer accidents than
many other cars. A major factor in this is that aggressive,
inexperienced or foolhardy drivers do not tend to select Volvos.
However, what is also true is that Volvos are the worst offenders for
accidents involving road users on two wheels or on foot. (Published
accident stats.) It may well be argued that these accidents arise from
just not being a very good driver. Volvos are well liked by the
insurance companies because these tend to be low payout accidents.
Do poor drivers select Volvos because they believe that they will be
better in the inevitable accident? The safety issue is a real example
of the power of advertising. We all know that Volvos are especially
safe because they ads say so. The facts are different: Remember maths O
level? Well, go and work out how hard a car hits the ground if it is
driven out of a first floor window. Then compare the impact with the
standard 30mph frontal impact for Euro approvals. Yes, any car on sale
today would perform similarly to the Volvo.
Compare the published stats for survival and injury severity rates for
different cars. Some things stand out concerning Volvos:
You are better off in an accident if you are in a big car. Since the
average Volvo is rather bigger than the average car, they are 'safer'
than the average car.
Within their size groups, Volvos are about average.
I'm not trying to pick on any individual driver (Volvo, XR3i or
whatever) just painting some backgournd. Also, I wonder why everyone
seems to believe (at least conciously) that they are much better
drivers than the average. The insurance industry rates 'average' as
being one accident every 30,000 miles or so. Where do we all stand?
I expect that everyone in here is safer than average because that
figure is pulled low by 18 year olds averaging one ding every 10,000
miles.
John O'Connor
|
2313.18 | Lorries? | PEKING::GERRYT | | Thu Sep 22 1994 13:59 | 15 |
| To state the obvious...........
I suppose the number of Volvo's on the road will have an effect on
the chance of them being involved in an accident!
I believe the false feeling of security is probably responsible for a
lot of road accidents with any 4 wheel vehicle.
How many Volvo drivers pull out in front of large articulated lorries?
If everyone was required to ride a motorcycle for a year, I'm sure they
would get a better perception of the dangers on the road!
Tim
|
2313.19 | Bikes & lorries | SUBURB::GINNJ | | Thu Sep 22 1994 15:01 | 22 |
| Ref .18
I did ride motorbikes on & off, over several years, and became
very well aware that a large percentage of car drivers do not see
anything that is not on four wheels. I agree that if everyone had
a spell of riding a bike, the number of car/bike accidents would
be much diminished.
Equally, I have some experience of large lorries, and am aware of
the capabilities and restrictions of their manoeuvres, and so
can, and do, make allowances. But, as in all areas of driving,
there are bad lorry drivers who take advantage of the size of
their vehicle to 'play games' with other road users. Anyone been
stuck behind two lorries driving in parallel on a duel
carriageway...?
I certainly enjoy the feeling of safety when driving a Volvo, but
don't believe that it leads me to take unnecessary risks - I like
the shape of it as it is! Some people will take mad risks
whatever they are driving, eg. XR2s, XR3s......
J
|
2313.20 | | GOONS::CLARKE | Me? Very Resourceful! | Thu Sep 22 1994 15:19 | 9 |
| Ref .19
Duel carriageway
^^^^^
couln't resist it especially as it seems kind of apt to action you describe
Alan
|
2313.21 | | METSYS::ALLEN | That's right, I was bounced. | Thu Sep 22 1994 15:30 | 1 |
| Is it pistols at dawn? Or should it really be a joust carriageway?
|
2313.22 | | FUTURS::JENKINS | Norfolk enchance | Thu Sep 22 1994 16:17 | 11 |
| re .17
To be fair to Volvos - as opposed to their drivers :-) they are
more than 'averagely' safe. Both the Road Transport Research Lab
and the German ADAC published reports showing BMW/Volvo/Mercedes
as the three safest mid-size cars.
Presumably during these crash tests they were driven by dummies?
mmm mmm mmm.
Richard.
|
2313.23 | But it is a 1966 1800S | MOEUR8::BROOKS | | Thu Sep 22 1994 17:26 | 13 |
|
I confess, I drive - albeit not very often - a Volvo.
However, I don't consider myself to be a *good* driver; just careful and
considerate. This applies whether I drive the Volvo or any other car.
I must admit I do treat *mainstream* Volvo drivers with a lot of
caution, but certainly no more than I would the young XR-whatever
driver, Company-Rep Sierra/Cavalier driver or the 80-something A40
driver...
Steve.
|
2313.24 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Thu Sep 22 1994 17:40 | 16 |
| I remember having a quick blast in a Volvo 340 (???) 1.7 jobbie. Great
rear wheel drive fun, I must say, and as cars (ie. forget the driving
style under discussion) I thought it was pretty good compared with what
I'd imagined.
As for Volvo drivers in general, I can't say as to really noticing a
difference.
But I did hear of a nasty head on crash between a Volvo and Porsche
drive (Porsche driver being the arsehole, I should point out) where the
Porsche driver and passenger were killed instantly, the volvo driver
and passenger came out of it alive, although unfortunately the volvo's
passenger, a young girl, was permanently brain damaged. Says a lot for
the cars, I think.
Dan
|
2313.25 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Thu Sep 22 1994 17:42 | 5 |
| re.-1
That didn't quite read properly, did it?! I meant I think Volvos are
pretty good in my estimate.
|
2313.26 | | LEMAN::CHEVAUX | Patrick Chevaux @GEO, DTN 821-4150 | Fri Sep 23 1994 10:52 | 15 |
| .24� I remember having a quick blast in a Volvo 340 (???) 1.7 jobbie. Great
.24� rear wheel drive fun, I must say, and as cars (ie. forget the driving
Just on the technical side ...
There are Volvos and Volvos.
The 3xx are basically Daf designs (renamed Volvo Netherlands). The
'real' Volvos are the 7xx and 9xx swedish designs. Now Volvo have
recently made a remarkable move called the 850: little in common with
the old swedish Volvos, the 850 is a FWD, transverse engine/gearbox,
decent suspension, less overweight ... etc ...
Should Volvo (Sweden) continue along the lines of the 850 we might have
to change our appreciation ....
|
2313.27 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Fri Sep 23 1994 10:57 | 3 |
| Oh. This was one of those little squary things, pretty much a brick on
wheels, but I must say I do like the look of the new Volvos -
particularly that T5 ...
|
2313.28 | What can I say ? | CMOTEC::JASPER | Stuck on the Flypaper of Life | Fri Sep 23 1994 22:48 | 11 |
| Volvo drivers ... AAARRGGHHH
Driving home tonight, on the A33 towards the M4. A ****** Volvo turned
right in front of me to access the garage. I dont think the driver even
knew I was there until the skid of tyres. Unless of course he/she was
just totally beligerent. (red 740 est)
Sorry, Volvo drivers deserve the panning they get.
Tony. }:^[]
|
2313.29 | Err it wasn't my choice, honest | WOTVAX::STUS::Stuart_Hatto | Mail me on WOTVAX:: -- STUS:: is a PC | Sat Sep 24 1994 10:33 | 14 |
| I actually chose a 480 for my lease car three years back.
Worst car I have ever driven! It has a steering fault from new which I was
told was a design fault, a gutless Renault 1700 engine, a crap automatic
gearbox (ok that was my fault, I shouldn't have chosen it).
I felt anything but safe in the car and spent two years trying to avoid any
kind of confrontation on the road, not that I go in for regular
confrontations you understand ;*)
In my experience the worst, most inconsiderate, beligerent, downright rude
drivers .. drive a 240.
Stuart
|
2313.30 | A public service | EICMFG::JOCONNOR | Somebody else did it and ran away. | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:26 | 11 |
| Yesterday, I discovered, not far from my current lodgings, an
organisation which appears to be devoted to the business of dismantling
Volvos.
Who says capitalism cannot have a social conscience? Perhaps I could
encourage them to open a few hundred branches in the UK.
They could offer a mobile service that would allow you to phone in and
nominate a particular Volvo for dismantling. ;-)
John O'Connor
|
2313.31 | maybe, maybe not ... | UPROAR::WEIGHTM | Act, Don't React | Mon Sep 26 1994 14:27 | 15 |
| I fully accept my personal experience may not be truly representative of the
population as a whole, but it's all I've got to go on!
1. A neighbour across the road reversed his Volvo into my (parked) car
2. About 2 years later, the same neighbour reversed his Volvo into my (parked)
car
3. A couple of months ago a lady Volvo driver reversed into the side of
my wife's (stationary behind a bus) car
Experience is what shapes our opinions :-)
Mike
|
2313.32 | and... | PIECES::ALCOR::RUSLING | Place holder for NOTES | Mon Sep 26 1994 14:36 | 4 |
|
And apparently Volvos are what shapes your cars...
Dave
|
2313.33 | Agree with -1 :-) | BAHTAT::CARTER_A | | Tue Sep 27 1994 12:13 | 13 |
| My first 'incident' back in '82 was a Volvo estate rear ending me at a
junction. No damage to the Volvo bumper (it just looked a bit cleaner
than the rest of the car), and one bent bumper and crushed rear wing to
my Austin 1300.
My last incident was a Volvo 34X using my passing car to stop at a give
way instead of her brakes.
In between the two, my car hasn't been in collision with any other
vehicle (concrete posts, yes, steep grass verges, yes, sharp knives,
yes, motorway slowing down type gravel, yes - but no other vehicles).
Andy
|
2313.34 | Mine's an 850....VOLVO | BRUMMY::LEONARDK | | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:26 | 17 |
| RE .27
I drive a VOLVO 850, they're excellent quiet, smooth, gadget rich cars
where you can put mountain bikes, ladders, 3m kitchen worktops inside!
After ordering I was asked by Hertz/carfleet what the flat cap and
barbour option was:-)
I can assure everyone that the 850 is a heavy car and not one to be hit
by, and they can embue a sense of false security, especially in dirty
motorway weather.
So be careful out there.
Regards
Ken, whose Civic was reversed into by a 240.
|
2313.35 | Volvo Drivers.... | SUBURB::GINNJ | | Tue Sep 27 1994 19:32 | 29 |
| Well, after reading some more notes, it seems that Volvo
drivers are pretty unpopular road users, and yes, some are
downright ignorant! Perhaps, just perhaps, I am the only decent
Volvo driver on the road...?
In response to some of the points raised, mine is a 'proper'
Volvo (740), and no, it's not a red estate! (dark blue saloon).
I've owned/driven 340s, 360s, 440s & 740s and basically, I've
been pleased with all of the ones I've owned. However, after
driving a 340 auto loan car, I have to say that I hated the auto
box - based I believe, on the Daf variomatic. The best has to be
my current 740.
I think generally, the big Volvos are better, despite the
comments made by some of you - but have you ever driven one? The
older ones may have been a bit like tanks to drive, but the more
recent ones are so much better and a pleasure to drive, I've
heard nothing but praise for the new 850.
I have to concede that some Volvo drivers are not good, and it
seems that I'm not a typical Volvo driver, but my note got some
good responses that made interesting reading - thanks! All I ask
is that you don't tar me with the same brush as all Volvo drivers
- I'm the one travelling from the Andover side of Basingstoke to
Decpark every day!
J
|
2313.36 | Not all Volvo drivers | PIECES::ALCOR::RUSLING | Place holder for NOTES | Wed Sep 28 1994 11:12 | 9 |
|
Why do all Volvo drivers stick their car's bumpers
out into the road when turning out of a T-Junction?
Dave
ps yes, I know that not all Volvo drivers are lousy
and not all XRNi drivers have fluffy dice, but you've
gotta make generalizations some time.
|
2313.37 | MORE QUESTIONS... | SUBURB::GINNJ | | Wed Sep 28 1994 11:36 | 16 |
| Re .36
and why do all Fiesta drivers stop about half a mile before the
junction, and then strain to see if it's clear to move off?
and why do Astra drivers pull out in front of me when I am only 2
yards away from their junction?
and why do Cavalier drivers fail to realise that they CAN move
over to the outside lane to allow me to join the main
carriageway?
there are so many unanswered questions, but yes you're right, you
have to generalise sometimes.....
J
|
2313.38 | Re.37 8-) | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Wed Sep 28 1994 12:54 | 14 |
|
>>> and why do all Fiesta drivers stop about half a mile before the
>>> junction, and then strain to see if it's clear to move off?
Interestingly, I noticed, whilst at Marlborough on training last week,
that most junctions over there have the white line across the road about a car
length (of their cars) short of the junction. Most times, stopping at the white
line meant that you couldn't see if the road was clear!
Maybe said Fiesta drivers were all from the US of A?
Malcolm.
|
2313.39 | | GTJAIL::MARTIN | Out to Lunch | Wed Sep 28 1994 16:22 | 5 |
| I think in the States the white line is the STOP line. You must (are
supposed to) stop at this line, then proceed (cautiously) into the
junction.
Martin (who has been to Boston BTW)
|
2313.40 | One hit me too | TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Sep 29 1994 13:49 | 9 |
| OK, another victim! My only accident in over 15 years was being hit broadside
by an elderly gentleman in an elderly 240. I was on a mini-roundabout, turning
right on a clear road with little traffic and a birght and pleasant day.
I saw him coming the other way, moved to the centre lane, indicating right, started
turning, then realsised he wasn't slowing or anything. He hit my tail broadside,
"oh, didn't see you!" p.s. his wife in the passenger seat had a pooch on her lap!
Richard
|
2313.41 | Volvos Beware | GRANPA::BBELL | | Thu Sep 29 1994 16:19 | 9 |
| Well, then, I wonder if you have the Lexus marque over in Cars_UK land?
While Volvo drivers may seem unconcerned about what is going on around
them, Lexus drivers seem to have settled the whole matter. They own
the road. No worries, mate. They own the road.
Lexus is an expensive sort of Toyota.
grins,
bob
|
2313.42 | | WELSWS::HEDLEY | Lager Lout | Fri Sep 30 1994 12:06 | 9 |
| re .41,
I had an encounter with a Lexus driver this morning, in fact, along
a narrow country lane, this git came hurtling around a blind bend at
around 60-70mph on the wrong side of the road. He missed me, but I
would like to think that he collided with a JCB or something shortly
afterwards.
Chris.
|
2313.43 | | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Fri Sep 30 1994 17:02 | 0 |
2313.44 | Lexus is an upstart trying to be a Jaguar/Rolls Royce/Mercedes! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Fri Sep 30 1994 17:05 | 6 |
| Toyota? Didn't they used to make Austin Sevens under licence?
Malcolm. ;^)
PS. I'll enjoy reading this Conference when I return from holiday on Monday 24th
October - if it still exists!
|
2313.45 | | WELSWS::HEDLEY | Lager Lout | Fri Sep 30 1994 17:09 | 6 |
| >PS. I'll enjoy reading this Conference when I return from holiday on Monday 24th
>October - if it still exists!
Do you know something I don't? :|
Chris$concerned.
|
2313.46 | it's worse on a bike... | BRIEIS::BARKER_E | test dummy | Fri Sep 30 1994 18:05 | 12 |
| The view from a bike is even worse, V***o drivers are legendary in most
bike magazines and after 10 years on two wheels I've got to the stage
where I worry if there's a Volvo waiting at the junction ahead far more
than any other car, and have been proved right on a number of
occasions.
My wife was at a road safety talk given by a police woman about a year
ago and there was mention of what was called the Volvo driver syndrome !
Euan
|
2313.47 | | KAOFS::M_NAKAGAWA | | Fri Oct 07 1994 00:33 | 21 |
| Volvo drivers are fine here in Vancouver Canada. ...in my opinion.
Much better than delivery vans and trucks, they are quite aggressive.
.44
>> -< Lexus is an upstart trying to be a Jaguar/Rolls Royce/Mercedes!
^^^^^^
????
Not likely, even Japan is importing a lots of them (also Daimler's)
most of them are kept at their carport in the summer since Jaguar still
means overheat.
>> Toyota? Didn't they used to make Austin Sevens under licence?
May be Nissan did.
Jaguar? Didn't they used to make sidecar and called SWALLOW and now
under FORD management?
Mitz
|
2313.48 | BMW used to make Austin 7's under licence | TRUCKS::BEATON_S | I Just Look Innocent | Fri Oct 07 1994 16:12 | 1 |
|
|
2313.49 | | AIMTEC::BURDEN_D | A bear in his natural habitat | Fri Oct 07 1994 18:10 | 5 |
| And they (BMW) also used to make these funny little eggs with wheels
under license from an Italian firm. There wouldn't be any 850i's around
today otherwise.
Dave
|
2313.50 | | WOTVAX::GILLILANDP | Not very Tuna-friendly | Fri Oct 07 1994 18:43 | 3 |
| ... not to mention aeroplanes.
Phil Gill.
|
2313.51 | VOVO drivers....again! | MKTING::WILSON | | Wed Oct 12 1994 09:49 | 24 |
| The last to evenings have been nice weather wise.
On both occasions while riding my motorbike, an accident has nearly been caused
by people driving Volvo's. One of drivers failed to give way, and the car in front
of me (and I) had to hit the brakes. The second incident involved this old
boy running a red light, just missing a minibus!
Now before all the Volvo drivers/supporters get up in arms about this, I'd just
like to say that in all the years I have been driving/riding bikes "the" Volvo
driver is the most lethal........not the car.
PROFILE Of MR/MRS LETHAL
CAR: VOLVO 240 or larger
AGE: 50 plus(and probably wearing a hat)
The hat wearing driver is significant, because these are usually the ones to
look out for!
I am sure that NOT all Volvo drivers are bad, it's just a certain type that
appear to be living in a world of their own on the road!
John
|
2313.53 | | NEWOA::GIDDINGS_D | Technoburnout | Wed Oct 12 1994 10:20 | 3 |
| A Vovo is a Volvo that has had the L driven out of it.
Dave
|
2313.54 | volvo driver with hat on | EEMELI::HAUTALA | Positive Blues | Wed Oct 12 1994 10:21 | 33 |
|
re -1:
Seen here in Finland last summer:
An elderly man (with a hat!) driving his old Volvo 240 DL and
overtaking with a great risk other cars. Overtakes other cars
highly risky, because of underpowered engine and wrong estimations.
Volvo driver seemed not to notice that he was a real danger on
four wheels.
Then, two younger lads with a Carina II start to tease the man.
They overtake the man, slow down, wait that he overtakes them,
overtake him again...etc.
This stupid thing ended, luckily with no accident, but with some
extremely dangerous situations. I remember the vision of thick
blue smoke coming from that old Volvo under hard acceleration and
the drivers neck shining red when he was driving against coming
traffic.
A lucky Volvo driver.
Hannu
|
2313.55 | | METSYS::ALLEN | Fink - The Funky Fish | Wed Oct 12 1994 10:23 | 1 |
| Nah, a Vovo driver is a volvo driver who needs an L plate.
|
2313.56 | | MKTING::WILSON | | Wed Oct 12 1994 11:06 | 7 |
| A VOVO driver is the same as a VOLVO driver, but try telling that to my 4 year
old who I found out last night, cannot pronounce VOLVO yet....what a blessing!
The Finnish noter said it all...watch out for those hat wearing VOVO/VOLVO
drivers!
|
2313.57 | I'm different from the rest! | SUBURB::GINNJ | | Wed Oct 12 1994 14:34 | 5 |
| Thank God I don't wear a hat, and I'm definately nowhere near 50 years
of age - does that exempt me ? I really am considerate to all you
other road users, even when I'm cut up, driven out in front of, etc.
etc. Some people see a woman driving a Volvo, and seem to think I must
be slow/dithery/indecisive etc. IT'S NOT TRUE!
|
2313.58 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Coito ergo sum | Wed Oct 12 1994 15:53 | 7 |
| RE: <<< Note 2313.57 by SUBURB::GINNJ >>>
� Thank God I don't wear a hat, and I'm definately nowhere near 50 years
We can definitely tell, can't we Mr. Dodd?
Cheers, Laurie.
|
2313.59 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Wed Oct 12 1994 16:36 | 3 |
| Err yes.
Andrew
|
2313.60 | | GVA05::STIFF | Paul Stiff EPSCC, DTN:821-4167 | Wed Oct 12 1994 18:44 | 4 |
| I have to second the last comments - no where near 50, don't wear a
hat... (850 + 1800 S)
Paul
|
2313.61 | How can you tell..... | SUBURB::GINNJ | | Wed Oct 12 1994 18:59 | 6 |
| re .58
Well, Laurie, would you like to expand on your comment?
BTW, what car do YOU drive.....?
J
|
2313.62 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Coito ergo sum | Thu Oct 13 1994 11:56 | 13 |
| Well, it's a sort of private joke centred around post early-1960's
education, such as Andrew and I enjoyed. There is a very unsubtle
clue to the "joke" in my note.
What do I drive? I have a Peugeot 405 GLDT estate for a family
runabout, due for replacement next summer by a Peugeot 806 TD. I also
have a somewhat lively Healey Frogeye (see note 1262) for summer fun
(when I can afford the insurance), and our second car is a 100K miles
old '87 1.6GL Escort Estate, soon to be retired.
I've never owned a Volvo, and I don't intend to.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
2313.63 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Thu Oct 13 1994 12:08 | 5 |
| Re 'unsubtle clue'
Very subtle Laurie :-)
Royston
|
2313.64 | Find a good word and reuse it. | BAHTAT::DODD | | Thu Oct 13 1994 12:29 | 4 |
| I can vouch for that, but don't worry Ginger, we wrinklies get this way
sometimes. Our mind just wanders off to some other halcyon day...
Andrew
|
2313.65 | What's a Peugeot 806 ? | TRUCKS::BEATON_S | I Just Look Innocent | Thu Oct 13 1994 13:23 | 1 |
|
|
2313.66 | | FORTY2::PALKA | | Thu Oct 13 1994 13:28 | 5 |
| re .65
Something like the Renault Espace/Toyota Previa.
Andrew
|
2313.67 | Space wagon | TOMMII::RDAVIES | Amateur Expert | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:06 | 10 |
| The joint MPV project between Pug/Citroen/fiat/lancia. It loks similar to
and is about the same size as the espace.
The citroen's called evasion in France but may be renamed when released
over here. The Lancia WONT be sold over here.
They all look the same except for front and rear light jobbies which 'brand'
the particular models.
Richard
|
2313.68 | Old Parisian Days | PIECES::ALCOR::RUSLING | Place holder for NOTES | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:29 | 11 |
|
In August on the Champs-Elysee I saw a Peugot garage
with the 806 in it and we all went to have a look (4 adults
and 5 children). I rather liked it. However, the diesel
is not out yet and it will be 1996 before the UK gets one.
I also believe that the insides are different between
Citroen, Peugot and Fiat. The price in French francs
was interesting as it look around 25% cheaper than the price
will be in the UK...
Dave
|
2313.69 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Coito ergo sum | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:39 | 9 |
| Yeah, all of the preceding few are correct.
The 806 has been released here in Belgium and I had a look a couple of
weekends ago. It's longer internally than any of the others I've seen,
and with all three rows of seats installed, still has enough room for
some luggage behind. It's due for UK release next spring or early
summer.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
2313.70 | Volvo don't make a people carrier: people don't buy Volvos! :-) | JANSKI::JOCONNOR | Somebody else did it and ran away. | Thu Oct 13 1994 15:21 | 3 |
| 7 replies and not one volvo!
John O'Connor
|
2313.71 | Yoo Hoo! I'm back! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Mon Oct 24 1994 13:22 | 18 |
| >>> I can vouch for that, but don't worry Ginger, we wrinklies get this way
^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> sometimes. Our mind just wanders off to some other halcyon day...
>>> Andrew
What do you mean, "we wrinklies," Andrew? I thought that you were a
mere child yet!
Mind you, my 15 year old grandson calls his parents wrinklies, says we
are grave fodder! Damn cheek I say!
Malcolm.
PS. No Chris, I don't know anything you don't, just wouldn't be surprised if the
non-Work related conferences did disappear!
|
2313.72 | Motorway madness | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Mon Dec 19 1994 17:14 | 22 |
| I thought I'd relate this story to get it off my chest.
Last night I was driving on a very quiet stretch of the M27 when an estate
car overtook me in lane 3 (I was doing about 70 in lane 1). There was
NO traffic in lane 2.
A saloon car (didn't notice what it was) then overtook me in lane 2
and moved into lane 3 to overtake the estate car. He then moved back to
lane 2 to undertake the estate who remained in lane 3. He must of
then thought the better of it and moved back to lane 3 and flashed the
estate car who then moved over. The saloon then overtook in lane 3
and then back to lane 2 and lane 1 as there was no traffic ahead.
The Estate (for some reason) remained in lane 2 and as the saloon
passed in front it flashed the car back.
Why the estate was in lane 3 in the first place and why it didn't move
over to let the car past in the first place is beyond me. But the need to
flash the driver back was totally uncalled for.
You have probably guessed by now, the estate was a -
VOLVO!
|
2313.73 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Mon Dec 19 1994 17:27 | 3 |
| Doesn't that just wind you up.
>]-( Grrrrrrrrrr
|
2313.74 | Marqist | CHEFS::MARCHR::marchr | | Mon Dec 19 1994 17:31 | 3 |
| For Volvo also read - BMW, Merc, Carlton, Audi, Range Rover etc etc
I don't think it marque specific...
|
2313.75 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Mon Dec 19 1994 17:35 | 3 |
| Sorry if I was being 'Marquist'
Royston :-)
|
2313.76 | ... | PIECES::ALCOR::RUSLING | Place holder for NOTES | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:14 | 5 |
|
It's the old, old problem on British motorways - no
lane discipline at all.
Dave
|
2313.77 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Three out of six ain't bad... | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:22 | 8 |
| I've frequently seen people pull over from lane 3 to allow a car to
pass (almost always after being flashed) only to return again
immediately afterwards. I'm convinced it's "manhood" type thing whereby
people feel somehow inadequate if they're not out there with the big
boys. The same sort of mentality that uses those bloody front "driving"
(aka useless for anything but dazzling other drivers) lights.
Cheers, Laurie.
|
2313.78 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:31 | 11 |
| I don't know whether they're driving or fog lights on the front of
mine. Can someone explain what they fit to Ford Sierra XR4's / Ghias /
Cosworths.... you know, the ones in the bumper along with the
indicators. Are they FOG or DRIVING?
They are handy, but at the moment they're on a different switch and
it's annoying to have to reach over the dash to turn 'em on and off, so
I don't bother, but my headlights are so bloody awful I need 'em. I
think I'll wire them up to the main beams some time....
:-)
|
2313.79 | sounds like they are fog lights | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:36 | 10 |
| If the lights come on automatically with full beam then they are
driving lights.
If you have to switch them on and the symbol on the switch is similar
to the rear fog light switch (but the beam on the symbol is pointing
downwards), then they are front fog lamps and should only be used
under the same rules as rear fog lights (when visibility is down to
less than 100 yards(or metres)).
Royston
|
2313.80 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:54 | 2 |
| Aaah. Problem.... I don't have access to a Sierra so I couldn't say.
Anyone help me?
|
2313.81 | | UNTADI::SAXBY | Vorsprung Durch Mahlzeit | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:58 | 9 |
|
If they're in the bumper, I believe they HAVE to be fog lights.
It's all to do with minimum height of the lights above the road.
Any additional lights below the headlights must be fog lights as
I recall.
Mark
|
2313.82 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:12 | 6 |
| Well it depends on what you define as a bumper ;-) !!
Anyway, I'd prefer an answer off some corporate-sierra-boring-mobile...
Cheers,
Dan
|
2313.83 | It is usually illegal to use them! | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:45 | 19 |
|
It is illegal to use ANY front lamp with its centre less than 24" from
the ground, call them driving or fog lamps!
Lamps with their centre less than 24" from the ground may ONLY be used
in falling snow or fog. The definition of fog given by Royston in .79 sounds
reasonable, but I don't know of any legal definition of fog.
I haven't yet found a legal definition governing the use of rear fog
lights, but I must admit to nasty feelings towards those who persist in using
them as normal rear lights - Ford drivers seem to me to be the major culprits
for this.
Whilst I'm having a moan, on frosty mornings like today, why oh why
don't people use their heated rear window? I can understand them not wanting to
stand outside in the cold, scraping the ice off the window, but to not flick a
switch beats me! Saw several this morning.
Malcolm.
|
2313.84 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:51 | 1 |
| I would if I had one :-]
|
2313.85 | Whats in a flash? | LARVAE::DRSD28::FARRELL | | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:51 | 9 |
| Re: .72 - alternative interpretation:
Saloon car flashes estate car in lane 3 meaning
"I say old boy, do you mind pulling over to let me through?"
Estate car moves over to let saloon car past and flashes back meaning
"Sorry about that, I was falling asleep."
Both cars continue peacefully into the night...
Chris
|
2313.86 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Always with the -ve waves | Tue Dec 20 1994 12:52 | 12 |
| �Estate car moves over to let saloon car past and flashes back
The flash was much longer and suggested to me that the Estate car
driver (who was exceeding 70mph) thought he was going fast enough and
no other car on road should need to overtake him.
He could not have possibly missed the car coming up behind him in the
first place.
Anyway, its ancient history now.
Royston
|
2313.87 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Three out of six ain't bad... | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:27 | 8 |
| Over here in Brussels, these bloody front lights are so "popular" that
people seem to have taken to driving on sidelights, and these
driving/fog lights only. Mad...
Maybe I'm just getting old, but I find my eyes are very sensitive to
all these bright lights, these days.
Laurie.
|
2313.88 | that's what they're for... | WOTVAX::STONEG | Temperature Drop in Downtime Winterland.... | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:29 | 11 |
|
>> Over here in Brussels, these bloody front lights are so "popular" that
>> people seem to have taken to driving on sidelights, and these
>> driving/fog lights only. Mad...
thats exaclty what you should do *if* it's foggy, there's no point in
switching on your front fog lights if you keep the headlights on -
they're lower down so that they reach further under the fog, without
reflecting straight back at you.
G
|
2313.89 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Three out of six ain't bad... | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:31 | 8 |
| Clarification:
They do it *all* the time. Except, of course, in the misty dull
mornings, or when it's raining. Except of course on a motorway, when at
the slightest excuse, on go the fog-lights, front and rear.
Laurie.
|
2313.90 | You must have seen the same car... | CHEFS::MARCHR::marchr | | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:34 | 8 |
| Ref -1
Like it - good wind up! 8^)
BTW Passed Cosworth driver this morning - bright blue sky, perfect
visability - fog lights on!
Dork...
|
2313.91 | Re last - I was referring to note .79 | CHEFS::MARCHR::marchr | | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:37 | 1 |
|
|
2313.92 | When was the last time YOU read it? | BLKPUD::WILLIAMSH | Flat tank Sunbeam rider | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:02 | 4 |
| The Highway code (remember that?) says you should use fog lights
if visibility is reduced to 100 metres or less.
Huw.
|
2313.93 | | FORTY2::HOWELL | Just get to the point... | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:07 | 14 |
| I fancy installing a generator in my car, capable of deliver a good
5000 watts continuous current, and then installing lots of flip-up 500
watt halogen lamps on the rear of my car. Then, when I find one of
these annoying bar stewards who is intent on putting his fog lamp on
whenever the road gets damp/there is a *slight* mist about/etc I'll
wait until I'm in front of him, then hit the switch and watch him veer
off the road, blinded, into a brick wall whereby he will suffer sever
injuries.
:-~
Hmmm.... wonder what my chances are in court! Maybe I could pull it
off, like that guy did who shot a young vandal for breaking into his
shed - a newspaper paid his fine! Coo-el!
|
2313.94 | A possibility...........? | CGOOA::PITULEY | Ain't technology wonderful? | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:57 | 10 |
| It could be that these people that run their fog lights on clear days
are emulating the North American practice of day-time running lights.
I know that when I drive my '86 Jag that does not have the running
lights, I run with either headlights or the fog lights lit.....it just
makes it that much more likely that some bonehead will see me and not
pull in front of me. It should be stated, however, that I do make sure
that *all* the lights that can be adjusted *are* aimed properly.
Brian
|
2313.95 | Not quite powerfull enough to blind. | ESBS01::WATSON | And so, it begins.... | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:24 | 6 |
| Re. .93
I knew of a nutter back in my collage days who had a rear facing 12V laser
mounted below his driving mirror for just such occasions.
Rik
|
2313.96 | Must admit that I haven't read the latest version - which is it now? | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:31 | 13 |
|
Re.92
>>> The Highway code (remember that?) says you should use fog lights
>>> if visibility is reduced to 100 metres or less.
>>> Huw.
You have to remember that the Highway code is NOT law. Only the
Motorway section(s) is based on the law - usually ignored by those ignoramous'
who drive in either of the overtaking lanes when there is no traffic in the
driving lane - like "Royston's" Volvo driver.
Malcolm.
|
2313.97 | Not quite. | PIECES::ALCOR::RUSLING | Place holder for NOTES | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:35 | 6 |
|
Old chestnut, it may not be law, but if you ignore
it then you can be done for whatever the modern equivalent
of "without due care and attention" is.
Dave
|
2313.98 | True. | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:44 | 0 |
2313.99 | Pedants Corner | WOTVAX::GILLILANDP | Not very Tuna-friendly | Tue Dec 20 1994 16:45 | 5 |
| >>5000 watts continuous current, and then installing lots of flip-up 500
The watt is not a measurement of current, but I know what you mean.
Phil Gill.
|
2313.100 | SNARF! | PLAYER::BROWNL | Three out of six ain't bad... | Tue Dec 20 1994 17:02 | 1 |
|
|
2313.101 | | UPROAR::EVANSG | Gridlocked on the Info Highway | Wed Dec 21 1994 09:00 | 8 |
| .96� You have to remember that the Highway code is NOT law. Only the
.96�Motorway section(s) is based on the law
Fog lights are specifically mentioned in law. I think it's the
Road Traffic Act (1960) but my detailed reference to that's at home.
This info comes from a policeman via CIX, where he quoted the relevent
passage and references.
|
2313.102 | | PLAYER::BROWNL | Not a sausage this week! | Tue Dec 27 1994 16:19 | 39 |
| Offered with no comment(!), this was pulled from Reuters news (see
LOBLO::EF94, topic 5)
Cheers, Laurie.
RTw 12/21 1250 Man goes berserk in car saleroom, many Volvos hurt
LONDON, Dec 21 (Reuter) - A British man was ordered by a judge to seek
psychiatric help on Wednesday after he drove a Volvo estate through the
plate glass window of a showroom, smashing eight other cars and
injuring two people.
Unemployed Shaun O'Hare, 27, lost his temper when he was told "no
money, no car" as he tried to buy a 20,000 pound ($31,201) Volvo 850
Estate in Lancashire, northern England, in April.
He started the car's engine and drove the Volvo at a salesman, pinning
him and another customer against a pillar.
O'Hare then slammed the car into reverse and hit two other cars in the
showroom, before careering through a plate glass window.
The Volvo shot down a grass embankment and crashed into five more
vehicles parked on the forecourt. O'Hare ran off but was caught by the
manager of the showroom.
Damage was estimated at 96,000 pounds ($149,700).
O'Hare pleaded guilty to damaging property while being reckless to
whether life was endangered.
He was placed on probation for three years on condition he attends a
psychiatric hospital as an out-patient. The judge at Manchester Crown
Court labelled his behaviour "grotesque and bizarre."
REUTER
|
2313.103 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs and some nuts. | Fri May 26 1995 10:09 | 12 |
| I never took much notice of this topic before, but last night
I had to take drastic action to avoid colliding with a Volvo -
not once but twice. They both saw me, but acted like I wasn't
there! <seeth>.
So I was all the more appreciative of Chris Evans' joke this
morning on Radio 1:
"I'm feeling very rebellious. I'm going to hire a Volvo for
the weekend and drive it a around really well."
Ian.
|
2313.104 | You're not alone | AYOV27::FW_TEMP01 | John Hussey - Dunure's great | Fri May 26 1995 10:44 | 5 |
| It may be me but that of the cars that pull out in front of me/totally ignore
oncoming traffic around me seem to drive Volvo's. This phenomena also
seems to get worse on Sunday mornings around churches.
Of course my brother drives a Volvo as well...nuff said!!
|
2313.105 | It's spreading | VANGA::KERRELL | DECUS Dublin 11-15 September'95 | Fri May 26 1995 13:09 | 7 |
| Hearing the squeel of several sets of tyres at M4/J11 last night I looked around
expecting to see the usual Volvo cutting up the rest of the traffic only to see
a 5-series BMW _estate_ complete with driver on his carphone. I didn't know BMW
made a 5-series estate but I think they should be stopped before this 'virus'
spreads any further.
Dave.
|
2313.106 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Lager Lout | Fri May 26 1995 13:44 | 8 |
| It's interesting to note that the drivers of `luxury' estate cars
are invariably terrible drivers. The worst of the lot, in my
experience, are Mercedes estates, usually with a couple of dogs
in the back, being driven by a middle aged middle class woman, who
obviously seems to consider other road users as common proles who
should bow in deference and just get out of the way...
Chris.
|
2313.107 | | BAHTAT::DODD | | Fri May 26 1995 13:55 | 9 |
| Chris,
Would you lump the Omega Estate in that category, 'cos there's quite an
overlap with company cars.
Andrew
PS Speaking as one of these I'd agree that all other road users are
proles who should get out of the way.
|
2313.108 | | UNTADI::SAXBY | You call _that_ a personal name? | Fri May 26 1995 14:18 | 7 |
|
> PS Speaking as one of these I'd agree that all other road users are
> proles who should get out of the way.
Been on the German 'Drive and Intimidate' course? :^)
Mark
|
2313.109 | | OVAL::CARSON | Don't leave earth without one | Fri May 26 1995 15:17 | 10 |
| It's an odd thing a Volvo. I borrowed my parents 240 estate to go
upto Ikea to do some shopping but once installed behind the wheel it
changed the way I drove. I came over with this 'tuff luck matey, I'm in
a Volvo'. Cutting people up and driving badly suddenly seemed less of
a crime.
It surprised me alot. Driving a Volvo really did change (momentarily)
my driviing attitutde.
paul
|
2313.110 | | RIOT01::KING | Mad mushrooms | Mon Aug 14 1995 15:36 | 20 |
|
Classic Volvo driver situation today - the parentage of all bad Volvo
drivers was out and about in Fareham multi-storey car-park today.
First of all he tries to take his sills away (and kill his dog which
was bouncing off the roof of his 740 estate) whilst trying to drive
over a bit of the car-park that's meant to say "you can't driver over
here, you have to drive around again"; then whilst I've got four cars
behind me who aren't going to move he proceeds to reverse into me. He
sits there for a full 30 seconds-ish before driving off. When I
finally apprehend him he was totally unaware of what he'd done (mid
60's-ish I'd say), tried to apologise profusely...
I felt even more angry when I came back an hour a bit later and found
his dog still in the back of the car in 25 degree heat (it was out of
the sun at least).
I mean, is this a case for an automatic re-test at 65 or what?
Chris.
|
2313.111 | | PJLPC::PHIL | THE Marog from Mars | Tue Aug 15 1995 13:58 | 11 |
| Driving over a barrier is stupid.
Reversing into your car is careless.
Cooking a dog in the back of the car is unforgivable.
I hope you called the RSPCA, called the police or broke a window.
Phil.
|
2313.112 | | WOTVAX::STONEG | Temperature Drop in Downtime Winterland.... | Mon Aug 21 1995 14:42 | 7 |
| >>> I mean, is this a case for an automatic re-test at 65 or what?
No, definitely not.
just involuntary euthenasia....
G.
|
2313.113 | This really is my first "contact" with the Volvo syndrome! | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Mon Apr 22 1996 14:25 | 9 |
| It had to happen!
Saturday afternoon in Harman's Water Road in Bracknell: two lanes
to a mini-roundabout, me in left one indicating to turn left, large
Volvo estate with woman driver aged in late 30's,herself not
indicating at all, move off when clear, she turns left into me!!!!!
Fortunately with me managing to avoid contact!
Malcolm.
|
2313.114 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Mon Apr 22 1996 19:12 | 6 |
| Happens a lot around here (not just by Volvo drivers) People often attempt to
`jump the queue' at roundabouts and other junctions by using the wrong
approach lane, then compound the situation by failing to indicate (presumably
to conceal their evil intent... or perhaps they're just crap)
Chris.
|
2313.115 | | COMICS::SUMNERC | OpenVMS Counter Intelligence | Tue Apr 23 1996 10:18 | 7 |
| Re 2313.114
That happened to me alot when I had my metro, but since driving a larger
car there seems to be a little bit more respect for my presence on
roundabouts in Basingstoke.
Chris
|
2313.116 | It was the first time I'd been "Volvo'd" | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Tue Apr 23 1996 12:59 | 9 |
| Re.14
There were only the two of us at this mini roundabout!
Re.15
I drive a Xantia, which isn't that small to be ignored, even by
Volvo drivers!
Malcolm.
|
2313.117 | | CHEFS::FIDDLER_M | The sense of being dulls my mind | Tue Apr 23 1996 13:08 | 4 |
| This happens quite a lot around Reading, people dont seem to realise
that you can go 'over the top' of a mini roundabout.
mikef
|
2313.118 | Mini roundabouts - go round! | WOTVAX::HILLN | It's OK, it'll be dark by nightfall | Wed Apr 24 1996 08:20 | 3 |
| About 8 years ago I went over the top of a mini roundabout and was
stopped by the police. I was told in no uncertain terms that they are to
be negotiated as if they are a full sized roundabout.
|
2313.119 | | CHEFS::FIDDLER_M | The sense of being dulls my mind | Wed Apr 24 1996 09:43 | 8 |
| re-1...but there are lots of Mini roundabouts where you *have* to go
over the top, there isn't room for two cars to follow the curve round,
if you see what I mean. Theres a good example on the A4 coming into
Reading, just at the Reading end of Prospect Park. Two lanes are fed
over the mini roundabout, and the right hand lane has no choice but to
go over the top.
Mikef
|
2313.120 | | CHEFS::FIDDLER_M | The sense of being dulls my mind | Wed Apr 24 1996 09:49 | 8 |
| its probably not so Ok if its a single lane and no other traffic about
ho, theres no need then.
sorry - hit ctrl-Z too soon.
Mikef
|
2313.121 | Getting away from Volvo drivers, aren't we? | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Wed Apr 24 1996 13:30 | 7 |
|
Surely, the main purpose of the Mini-Roundabout is simply to
allocate priority, as on a "normal" roundabout? If the vehicle on your
right crosses the white line across his road first, then he/she/it has
priority over you - n'est pas?
Malcolm.
|
2313.122 | giving way at roundabouts ? | IOSG::KALUS | | Thu Apr 25 1996 10:08 | 13 |
| re .121
What exactly are the rules for giving way at roundabouts? The
latest (? 1993) copy of the Highway Code just says:
"On reaching the roundabout, give way to traffic on your right unless
road markings indicate otherwise."
It doesn't say the traffic already has to be on the roundabout for you
to give way to it. Where I live, people get very confused at
mini-roundabouts.
Chris.
|
2313.123 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Thu Apr 25 1996 11:14 | 13 |
| How can give way to your right be confusing ?
If there is noone on the roundabout theres normally nothing to give
way to.
On a mini roundabout if there is someone already at the junction
to your right they have right of way.
If cars reach all the junctions on a mini roundabout at the same
time and all stop then its the most assertive driver that gets right of
way !
Royston
|
2313.124 | | RIOT01::SUMMERFIELD | Robomandog - Third State of Being | Thu Apr 25 1996 11:35 | 9 |
| re .123
�If cars reach all the junctions on a mini roundabout at the same
�time and all stop then its the most assertive driver that gets right of
�way !
Or the Volvo driver!!
Clive
|
2313.125 | | FORTY2::PALKA | | Thu Apr 25 1996 12:21 | 6 |
| What about the cars that approaches the roundabout from the same
entrance road. You are in the left lane, he is in the right lane.
Do you have to give way to him, even if he wants to turn left and you
want to go straight on ?? (He is on your right).
Andrew
|
2313.126 | Secret volvo drivers ??? | WOTVAX::HATTONM | Waiting for JS to offer me a drive... | Thu Apr 25 1996 12:24 | 6 |
|
Judging by some of the questions in this note we seem to have a
few "secret" volvo drivers in here %*)
- MARK -
|
2313.127 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Thu Apr 25 1996 12:50 | 5 |
| Re .125
Andrew I assume you are having a laugh.
Royston
|
2313.128 | | FORTY2::PALKA | | Thu Apr 25 1996 13:06 | 20 |
| re .127
Not really. There is one roundabout where people routinely go into the
right hand lane to turn left (onto a dual carriageway). The highway
code does say 'On reaching the roundabout, give way to traffic on your
right unless road marking indicate otherwise'. Judging from much of the
recent remarks in this conference I would think that would be
sufficient for some people to feel fully justified in turning left from
the right hand lane and expecting people in the left hand lane to give
way to them (does anyone think this is the intention of those words ? I
think they refer to traffic which entered the roundabout from a
different road).
One of the problems seems to be in ambiguous set of rules, which are
treated by many people as 'optional' when they are inconvenient to
them. Together with an ever increasing amount of agressive driving,
with people asserting their 'rights', it's not really surprising that
road rage is happening.
Andrew
|
2313.129 | You don't understand... | CMOTEC::JASPER | Stuck on the Flypaper of Life | Thu Apr 25 1996 13:27 | 21 |
| The highway code is quite clear & unambiguous.
If you intend to turn left at a roundabout, take the left lane.
If you intend to turn right, take the right lane.
Quite difficult to misinterpret that.
:-)The process of turning left from the right lane is validated like
this :
(extract from Volvo Highway code)
If the left lane is full, use the right lane, go round the roundabout &
shortcut the turn left queue, they have to give way to you now. If
encountering a miniroundabout where there is insufficient turning circle
for this manouvre, it acceptable to use the right lane to turn left, as
you are acting within the spirit of turning right to go left & its not
your fault your estate car is too long for the manouvre.
There, doesnt that now make perfect sense ? :-)
Tony.
|
2313.130 | What a difference that would make on the roads! | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Thu Apr 25 1996 14:59 | 7 |
|
One of the problems today, is that everyone has "rights" and no-one
will accept any "responsibilties."
IMHO we don't have any rights, only responsibilities.
Malcolm.
|
2313.131 | | IOSG::LOCKWOOD | Do you like our owl? | Thu Apr 25 1996 15:31 | 15 |
|
If you know Reading... Come off the IDR and go up towards Central
Pool. Two lane road, two lane entry to the roundabout. One exit
is left, one right. So, logically, those turning left get in the
left lane and those turning right in the right.
NOT! Everyone turning left gets in the right lane because they
know that just round the corner they'll have to queue in the right
hand lane to turn right at the lights.
So, you wanna turn right at the roundabout? Well, you can just wait
for everyone to queue for the lights in your lane and then turn left.
There are words for these people, but they're not for public
places.
Pete
|
2313.132 | | COMICS::CORNEJ | What's an Architect? | Thu Apr 25 1996 16:41 | 7 |
| FWIW (and its not much), big Volvos actually have better turning
circles than many smaller front wheel drive cars.
I'll put my hat back on now.
Jc
|
2313.133 | Re.132 Mein Got, Not one who wears a Trilby in the car! | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Thu Apr 25 1996 18:05 | 1 |
|
|
2313.134 | How about this then ???? | WOTVAX::HATTONM | Waiting for JS to offer me a drive... | Fri Apr 26 1996 09:40 | 20 |
|
Just a thought.... but if you want to take the first exit left off a
roundabout and the left hand lane is backing up (assuming the
roundabout has at least two entry routes, one or more exits don't
matter) then get in the most r/h lane and GO ALL THE WAY ROUND THE
ISLAND !!! This then means you have priority, as you are coming from
the right to the traffic you have just passed, wanting to turn left as
you went down the r/h lane to turn left in the first place......
Of coarse, if you come across a mini roundabout, this may cause a
problem but not to estate volvo drivers as they have a better turning
circle than mere motal cars. Mind you the labrador in the back will
think he is on an Alton Towers ride as he/she rebounds around the back
of the compartment but the driver will never notice as they think the
mirror is for decoration only.....
All IMO of coarse %*)))
- MARK -
|
2313.135 | | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Fri Apr 26 1996 10:26 | 10 |
|
I think you got that in one, Mark, with your last paragraph. I
like the mirror bit - it just about sums up the situation!
It was a double mini-roundabout, just into Harman's Water Road at
the Sports Centre end in Bracknell - if you know it. Said Volvo wanted
to turn right at the second mini-roundabout! There was no other
traffic but the two of us .....
Malcolm
|
2313.136 | left + right = straight on? | BPSOF::BROWN | Chris Brown | Fri Apr 26 1996 12:49 | 7 |
| If it's a double mini-roundabout, then isn't turning first left then
right considered to be going straight on? In which case he is allowed
to use the right hand lane. Though this does not include chopping
across the front of you in the process though, of course.
Chris
|
2313.137 | It's not often that I'm right, maybe I'm wrong again. | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Fri Apr 26 1996 13:11 | 11 |
|
Well, I could be wrong (nothing unusual in that), but I thought
that the whole idea of having two (mini) roundabouts, is that you have
TWO (mini) roundabouts - if you see what I mean. Otherwise one would
suffice.
This particular junction used to be a straight forward "T" so may
be Volvo drivers simply don't have acknowledge the change, as it is
now a left and a right turn as you say.
Malcolm.
|
2313.138 | Indicating right means straight on! | THEOWL::SACKMANJ | I was dreaming of the past... | Wed May 01 1996 23:32 | 12 |
| I was going thru cars_uk waiting for the volvo drivers note to come
up, to add a note about roundabouts and its nearly al been done...
One more to add (six different volvos in four days!!):
Volvo driver in outside lane, indicating right as approaching
roundabout, drives straight on. Two of these 'drivers' indicated left
as soon as they were on the roundabout just to clarify their position
In four of these incidents there was only one exit lane
Jon.
|
2313.139 | ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) ;^) | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Thu May 02 1996 09:21 | 12 |
|
No! No! No!
Indicating "right" on a Volvo means only that the indicator lever
has been "down" for some time - maybe with something hanging on it
holding it down. You read too much significance into the Volvo drivers
use of indicators.
Surely you remember the Mini and old ladies pulling out the Choke
to hang their handbag on it? It is the same syndrome.
Malcolm.
|
2313.140 | | KERNEL::IMBIERSKIT | Good frames, Bad frames... | Thu May 02 1996 09:58 | 7 |
| Isn't it the case that you are not supposed to infer anything from
another driver's use of indicators? Defensive driving and all that.
cheers,
Tony I
|
2313.141 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Thu May 02 1996 10:24 | 7 |
| > Isn't it the case that you are not supposed to infer anything from
> another driver's use of indicators? Defensive driving and all that.
it's sad that some other drivers are so inconsiderate/crap/whatever that
`defensive driving' must become the norm, IMO.
Chris.
|
2313.142 | vacant on possession..... | WOTVAX::HATTONM | Waiting for JS to offer me a drive... | Thu May 02 1996 13:45 | 23 |
|
volvo in fast lane of M6 this morning doing 60ish, slows down for
corners to 50ish and driving so close to the left of the lane that he
looked like he was continually going to pull over to the centre lane...
No chance !! even though he could have pulled in several times he
continued on his way..... for 2/3 miles before slipping into the middle
lane.
Hmmmmmmm
Anyway, arn't volvo indicators there to confuse the driver ??? and give
them a 50/50 chance of switching on the windscreen wipers at the first
attempt, or instaed of flashing you they go to wash/wipe or visa
versa at roundabouts for indicating ??? Who knows the secrets of the
volvo drivers mind ?? certainly not the driver !?!? %*) who seems to
switch to a vacant blinkered look as soon as the door is closed....
Just a thought %*)) incase I offend the secret volvo drivers of this
conf..
- MARK -
|
2313.143 | Sshhhhh | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Thu May 02 1996 14:16 | 5 |
|
I hate to admit it, but I know a Volvo driver .... AND .... he's a
car scheme driver.
Malcolm.
|
2313.144 | Are you going to "out" him/her, Malcolm? | CHEFS::CROSSA | May your chickens grow lips!!! | Thu May 02 1996 15:14 | 4 |
| It would be a brave/foolish Volvo driver who owned up in this string!
Stretch.
|
2313.145 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Thu May 02 1996 15:44 | 9 |
| >brave/foolish
Take your pick.
I used to have a 360GLT 10 years ago. Great car. Never
thought at the time there was such a stigma attached to driving a
Volvo !
Royston
|
2313.146 | hmmmmmmmmm. | CHEFS::CROSSA | May your chickens grow lips!!! | Thu May 02 1996 16:49 | 7 |
| Royston,
You were not driving a Volvo 360 10 years ago that pulled out in front
of me on my motorbike were you?
Stretch (who does not forget those sort of things)
|
2313.147 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Thu May 02 1996 17:34 | 4 |
| Definately not. I am a motorcyclist myself and am _very_ conscious
of folks on two wheels.
Royston
|
2313.148 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Thu May 02 1996 17:38 | 6 |
| > Definately not. I am a motorcyclist myself and am _very_ conscious
> of folks on two wheels.
you mean, like me when I'm taking a corner too fast?
Chris.
|
2313.149 | secret volvo drivers spotted ?? | WOTVAX::HATTONM | Waiting for JS to offer me a drive... | Thu May 02 1996 17:52 | 4 |
|
2 yes TWO volvo 850 estates at the BBP today.... oh dear %*)
-MARK -
|
2313.150 | Be afraid! | CHEFS::CROSSA | May your chickens grow lips!!! | Thu May 02 1996 18:02 | 6 |
| >>2 yes TWO volvo 850 estates at the BBP today.... oh dear %*)
Careful, they may start breeding!
Stretch.
|
2313.151 | What an admission! | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Fri May 03 1996 09:26 | 6 |
| <<< Note 2313.144 by CHEFS::CROSSA "May your chickens grow lips!!!" >>>
-< Are you going to "out" him/her, Malcolm? >-
^^^
Good lord no, he happens to be friend - I didn't admit that,
honest!!
Malcolm.
|
2313.152 | | COMICS::CORNEJ | What's an Architect? | Fri May 03 1996 14:33 | 11 |
| OK - I'll own up...
I did have a 740 estate on the scheme the car before this one. It was
good value at the time when I needed a large estate car. Also had more
wellie than some people expected when they tried to go right from the
left hand lane when I was already in the right hand lane (so I wanted
to turn left - what was wrong with that :-)
Jc
|
2313.153 | WOW! That must have taken a lot of courage to own up! ;^) | CHEFS::POWELLM | On [email protected] | Fri May 03 1996 14:57 | 1 |
|
|
2313.154 | | CHEFS::BRIGGS_R | they use computers don't they | Tue May 07 1996 10:22 | 33 |
|
Oh well, here goes...
1975 to 1980 - 1969 Volvo 142 (got rid of at 185,000 miles)
1980 to 1989 - 1974 Volvo 144 (died of rust. Not a good vintage)
1989 to 1994 - 1982 Volvo 240 (written off by a Celica driver)
Also had a company 340 from 1985 to 1987.
Guess that makes me a Volvo driver! Only trouble is I havn't got one
now. Mind you they don't make them like they used to.
Currently we have a Fiesta and a company Frontera (recent acquisition).
It is utterly amazing the difference in other driver's attitudes when I
am driving one over the other. I would not have believed it. I think
driver attitude towards other cars is an under researched area and the
'Volvo Driver' syndrome is probably an example.
I don't believe Volvo drivers are any worse than other big car (note
*big car*) drivers. I just think Volvo built up an attitude problem by
the following three strategies...
1) Promoting themselves, rather smugly, as 'safe'. Implies the drivers
are smug. This started in the early 70s.
2) Fitting ridiculous bumpers in 1974 which made the safety message
stand out even more. Mind you, they worked. I know, I was that man!.
3) Fitting so-called 'running lights'. Once again, rubbing people's
faces in the safety message. Mind you, they are a great idea. Can't see
anything wrong whatsoever. Just adds to the smugness 'image' though.
Richard
|
2313.155 | | CBHVAX::CBH | Mr. Creosote | Tue May 07 1996 10:39 | 17 |
| There are definitely differing attitudes by some drivers to the sort of car
someone is driving. I remember that thing on the telly a while back looking
into drivers' attitudes, and that sales rep going on about pecking orders, and
that a Cavalier L had no right to be in front of his GL, but if he saw an SRi
coming up behind he would let it past. I thought at the time that this was
rubbish, but I've noticed that it does ring true; I tend not to hang about
when I'm driving, and usually overtake all and sundry (let us not get
sidetracked; I'll state now that I generally adhere to speed limits, and don't
overtake in places where I don't have a clear view); when I do this in my
flash M reg. Calibra, I generally don't get any hassle (with the exception of
the occasional A reg XR3, who might take it as an invitation to race; I let
them go), but, when overtaking in my Mum's old 1.1 Polo, some other drivers
did not like this at all, many would speed up as I was going past, drive right
on the bumper once I'd overtaken, flash their lights, gesticulate, etc, etc.
Unreal.
Chris.
|
2313.156 | VOLVO's no fun ?? | WOTVAX::BRUCEA | | Thu Jul 04 1996 11:58 | 32 |
|
I have now had a 240 estate for about 4 months.I don't have a flat cap
or a labrador. It is the family car (I have a calibra SE4 for work!!).
We got it to replace a citroen AX as we now have a third child and
three car seats dont fit in the back of an AX.
I wanted something big, old and cheap. It is 1984 with almost 150,000
miles on the clock(speedo was broken) and I think it's just fantastic!
The mechanic's are simple enough that even I can mantain it, it's
incredibly easy to drive and with a tiny turning circle it easy to
park.
top speed 80ish , acceleration - not bad for its age etc.
Now the surprise:- I am in our local car club (Highland Car Club) and
have been competing in the novice road rallies this season. The first
three rounds were completed in the AX with reasonable success, then we
sold the AX.
The last two rounds were done IN THE VOLVO!! :-)
It was great, some very strange looks from people in rs2000's, 205's
etc but on single track roads it handles really well!!
The last round was 2 weeks ago and I was placed third which gave me
enough points to win this season's novice championship.
Who say's VOLVO's are boring??
Adrian Bruce
|
2313.157 | | BPSOF::BROWN | Chris Brown | Thu Jul 04 1996 13:35 | 6 |
| 3rd in a 240? I guess these were 12 car events with a 25% entry,
right?
(no reflection on your driving ability intended!)
Chris
|
2313.158 | third of three ??? | WOTVAX::BRUCEA | | Sun Jul 07 1996 17:07 | 11 |
|
I think there were 14 entries and we were 6th or 7th overall.
It was good crack and we surprised a few people.
Its so long that it feel weird handbraking round a hairpin!!
adrian :-)
|