T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
12.1 | | BACH::GREEK | | Mon Nov 25 1985 10:03 | 8 |
| I have a good friend in Newton who has had a lot of plastering done.
I'll get the name of his person.
I also suggest you call up Channel 2 and find out who does the
plastering for This Old House.
- Paul
|
12.2 | | FURILO::JACKSON | | Tue Nov 26 1985 16:09 | 8 |
| Someone told me yesterday that I'd be better putting drywall up on the
ceiling, and then having someone that knows what they're doing put a skim
coat over the whole thing.
Any comments?
-bill
|
12.3 | | SWORD::WELLS | | Wed Nov 27 1985 10:35 | 5 |
| re .2
Most plasterers want to work with "blue board" vs drywall. If you are going
re-surface the ceiling to receive plaster, I would suggest you investigate this.
|
12.4 | | FURILO::KAISER | | Wed Nov 27 1985 23:45 | 14 |
| Bill --
I thought you'd never ask. We've recently had a lot of plastering done,
and we're very pleased with the work. The price -- compared with all the
other estimates we got -- was good. Since you know where to find us, you're
welcome to come over and take a look at the work.
Brendan Gormley
I can find his number for you, so I won't bother to post it here. Get an
estimate from him and see whether you like it. Incidentally, he put up blue
board before plastering the ceilings; it's not the same as drywall.
---Pete
|
12.5 | | ELUDOM::CLARK | | Thu Nov 28 1985 14:03 | 7 |
| RE: .4
Where is your plasterer, Brendan Gormley, located?
Did he use blue board or lath on walls?
-- Ward
|
12.6 | | FURILO::KAISER | | Fri Nov 29 1985 12:59 | 16 |
| Our plasterer:
Brendan Gormley
29 Ottawa Road
Arlington MA 02174
643-1384
Please mention my name if you call him. His work seems good, the price was
good, and he was punctual and reliable. Anyone who wants to give me a call
about taking a look at the work, try me at DTN 225-5441, or write me a note.
Ward -- he used bluboard, be for us he did only ceilings. Do you have an
opinion on the topic?
---Pete
|
12.46 | Unconventional bathroom ceiling options? | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Thu Feb 20 1986 11:19 | 9 |
|
I'm going to be doing some cosmetic work to our bathroom. Has
anyone seen or heard of any materials for the ceiling other than
the basics (i.e., sheetrock, tile, wood, suspended ceilings)?
It's a small area so cost is no factor.
I'm tired of washing mildew!
Steve
|
12.47 | <<The whole ceiling is a pain>> | WILLIE::TIMMONS | | Wed Feb 26 1986 15:51 | 18 |
| Steve, I believe I've seen you in other notes. Hi.
I have a Cape, and I just went thru the mildew washing. Unfortunately,
I waited too long, and now I have mucho peeling. The base material
seems to be just fine, except for a yellowing. I can't decide if
I should try to remove all the old paint ( How is also a decision
I haven't faced), and then apply new , or replace the ceiling.
It seems foolish to re-do the whole thing, but I can't see an easy
way to remove the old paint for a smooth finish.
I've been told that the major problem with the peeling is that a
good seal has not been established around the perimeter. This is
a definite problem, as I have different wall covering materials,
and I don't want to seal them in place with RTV caulking.
If you, or anyone has suggestions, fire away, please!!!
Lee
|
12.48 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Thu Feb 27 1986 09:59 | 22 |
| If you've already got peeling there probably isn't much you can
do to totally correct that problem. However, when/if you replace
the ceiling, I'd recommend sheetrock and gloss white enamel paint.
The gloss paint is more waterproof, I think, than flat or semigloss,
and is also easier to wash if necessary. I once owned a house in
which the former owner had used textured paint on the bathroom
ceiling...a BAD choice!!!
I think you can buy paint with fungicides in them, which might help
if you have a real mildew problem.
If you repaint the ceiling, be sure you kill all the mildew first
and wash it down really well. Regular household bleach works just
fine for killing and washing off mildew. Follow that with a wash
with SpicNSpan to get off any grease, and you should be okay.
If you do have a mildew problem, look into getting rid of some of
the excess water in your bathroom that is causing it. A vent fan,
or even just a fan to blow the moist air out into the rest of the
house.
Steve
|
12.49 | fan before it's too late.. | THORBY::MARRA | This space intentionally left blank ... | Thu Feb 27 1986 12:47 | 7 |
|
My house, being less than a year old has none of these proplems.
I guess it is all a matter of time though. I think I'll put in
an exhaust fan before it gets too late...
.dave.
|
12.7 | It's done, it's done!!!! | 11740::JACKSON | What the hell, at least it was fun! | Tue Mar 25 1986 08:17 | 15 |
| Well, it's finally done. And I must say, it looks great
Brendan Gormley did the job, at a very reasonable price. We removed
all of the old plaster and cleaned out the lath. he came in and
put up blue board, then skimmed it. The price, $295.00 for a 13x13
room, smooth finish.
AND as an added bonus, we had a large hole in the hallway wall,
and when he was leaving (guess he had a little extra plaster) he
fixed that! (no charge!)
Thankss for the suggestion Pete
-bill
|
12.8 | Hanging a new ceiling is essential!!! | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Fri Apr 04 1986 10:59 | 12 |
| We had our kitchen & MBR ceilings replastered the fall of '84. We shopped
around for the best price. One local plasterer said he would not
do it without first hanging a new ceiling. Another local plasterer
said there is a special bonding material that makes hanging a new
ceiling unnecessary and is cheaper. The first plasterer said it
doesn't work. Guess which plasterer we selected?
There are now cracks in both ceilings!!
but I won't buy the Brooklyn bridge
herb
|
12.9 | Alternative to the Plasterer | CDR::GEE | | Fri Apr 04 1986 16:44 | 13 |
| There is also a novel item called a ceiling button which consists
of a perforated washer 1.5" in diameter. The washer has a larger
hole in the center for the insertion of a screw. One locates the
lath underlying the plaster and then fastens the screw to the lath.
This will draw up a sag in the ceiling (but do it with some care
and 6" spacing between the buttons - along the stress point). Then
you can cover the button with Spackle, joint compound or plaster
and follow with paint, when dry.
Ceiling buttons also work well on wall cracks, etc. It is a quick
and simple repair and I've many that are still holding after six
years.
Mike G
|
12.10 | What's "Blue Board"? | 9356::BARANSKI | Did YOU wake up with a smile? :-> | Wed May 07 1986 14:24 | 0 |
12.11 | | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Fri May 09 1986 09:57 | 4 |
| Blue board is necessary when you plan on skim coating instead of
the tape, compound, paint route used for sheetrock (drywall).
Steve
|
12.68 | Flat over glossy ceiling paint | SSVAX::SARAO | The ZIP | Fri Jun 06 1986 09:25 | 7 |
| My kitchen ceiling has got a glossy paint finish that is nice
and really reflects the light. However my wife would like to cover this
with a flat white. The problem is that we do not know what kind of paint
was put up there (latex/oil base) and whether we can coat it with a regular
flat. Any suggestions....?
Robert
|
12.69 | She may regret that choice | CACHE::BRETSCHNEIDE | | Fri Jun 06 1986 10:16 | 9 |
| Your wife may find out that the flat finish paint is a great grease
catcher. That's why they use semi-gloss paint for kitchen ceilings.
It is very easy to wash if need be.
BTW, speaking of washing walls, ceilings, etc. If you need to remove
crayon marks, try using WD-40. It works GREAT! I've only tried
it on semi-gloss though.
Bruce Bretschneider
|
12.70 | Compatiblity of paints | SSVAX::SARAO | The ZIP | Fri Jun 06 1986 11:30 | 7 |
| Can that paint be put over any paint..? What I'm afraid of is putting this
paint over a paint that is not the same (oil/water based) and have it peel.
We do gather a lot of steam on the ceiling from cooking on the stove. Are
paints compatible this way...?
Robert
|
12.71 | Spic 'n Span lives! | JOET::JOET | Just like a penguin in bondage... | Fri Jun 06 1986 11:33 | 5 |
| Also keep in mind (gee, I seem to have learned a lot through
experience) that kitchen walls and ceilings get very greasy. Don't
skimp on the cleaning. Do it twice. Trust me.
-joet (of the peeling kitchen ceiling)
|
12.72 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Fri Jun 06 1986 11:38 | 21 |
| I'd hesitate to use WD-40 to remove anything from a wall; I'd be
afraid of paint peeling the next time I painted. Have you tried
painting over it later?
For washing paint, Spic'n'Span is the thing (otherwise known as
trisodium phosphate). No matter what kind of paint you end up
using, wash the ceiling well first. Peeling ceiling paint, once
started, seems to be impossible to stop, and kitchen grease seems
to be a great contributing cause. Gloss paint isn't a great
base for painting over under the best of conditions. There is
some stuff you can buy that kills the gloss - sort of a liquid
sandpaper effect - that might be a good idea. I'm not sure what
the stuff is called, but it shouldn't be too difficult to find.
I'd advise against flat paint on a kitchen ceiling too. Semi-gloss
at the very least, and gloss better. Sometimes practicality needs
to override aesthetic considerations. But I guess that depends
on how much you value being practical.
Steve
|
12.73 | Scuff the surface and you should be okay | WEBSTR::BEYER | Don't Leave Perth Without It | Fri Jun 06 1986 14:05 | 9 |
| I have painted gloss oil over gloss latex - the result of some
monumentally bad advice about how gloss latex was just as good as
oil-based for covering wood trim - without any trouble. I was told
the only problem might arise because the gloss paint doesn't give
a good surface for the next layer to stick to, so I went over all
the surfaces with a jitterbug sander lightly. I would probably
go after your ceiling the same way.
HRB
|
12.74 | SAND-BAN may save your elbows! | LATOUR::PALMIERI | | Fri Jun 06 1986 14:11 | 19 |
| Re .4 Sears used to sell (don't know if they still do) a product
called SAND-BAN. Wipe the to be painted surface with it and you
don't have to sand. It seemed erode the gloss of glossy paints
and saves a lot a work if the surface doesn't need sanded for other
reasons.
I think you can safely put the flat latex over gloss oil if the
gloss is removed. However, like the others I would be hesitant
to do so. At least examine the ceiling now to see if it collects
grease. I have a ceiling with flat latex but also have cabinets
and a hood. Mine was flat when I bought the house and we don't
have any problem. But I certainly remember my mother washing grease
off the ceiling and walls of our kitchen when I was a kid.
Marty
over the stove.
|
12.50 | Mildew preventatives | NUWAVE::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Thu Jun 26 1986 17:48 | 6 |
| If you go to a "real" paint store, not Sears, Channel or Grossmans,
you can pick up a small mildew preventative additive that you can
mix in with your paint. This stuff is usually mixed in with house
and deck stains.
-al
|
12.51 | | DSSDEV::BROWN | | Fri Jul 11 1986 13:36 | 6 |
|
I've seen a bathroom [my brother in-law's] which used sheet "Corian"
(sp?) on ceiling and walls. Its a man mand material, comes in large
sheets of various thickness and is kinda expensive. The typical
use is for kithchen counters. Anyway, looks good, waterproof, minimal
seams, easy to work with...
|
12.52 | | BEING::WEISS | Forty-Two | Tue Jul 15 1986 08:17 | 4 |
| You'd have to have a heck of a lot more $$$ than I do to put Corian on a
ceiling.
Paul
|
12.53 | info on Corian? | NOVA::BWRIGHT | | Tue Jul 15 1986 10:28 | 23 |
| I've heard a lot about Corian (besides being expensive). Has anyone
used the stuff? Is is really the miracle substance that they claim?
Is it easy to clean?
As for cost, I've started some preliminary checking and have discovered
that the price is NOT really prohibitive. There is a Corian wall
kit for bath tubs that I saw run for $430 (don't think this included
Corian on the ceiling, although it is not a bad idea). Don't
remember what the cost was for the cast iron tub. Corian comes
in large sheets in various thicknesses. A thin Corian piece for
the ceiling may be more expensive than other alternatives, but the
cost may be worth it if it is maintenance free!
For comparison, I saw the single unit fiberglass bathtubs run for at
least $600 AND they are a pain to clean. I, for one, want to
investigate this Corian stuff more before dumping the idea.
Marlar is another "miracle" polymer used for bathroom countertops
that is similar to Corian. It is supposed to be quite a bit cheaper
than Corian. I have not heard of it being sold in sheets, so don't
know if it is an alternative for the ceiling.
Bill
|
12.54 | Corian Counter tops = Big $$$'s | OLORIN::SEGER | | Tue Jul 15 1986 12:31 | 4 |
| On the subject of Corian, I priced it for counter tops and a 30" wide strip
(I didn't remember to ask the thickness) was $50/running foot!!!!!
-mark
|
12.55 | I love my Corian counters | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | Vic Hamburger IND-2/B4 262-8261 | Tue Jul 15 1986 13:53 | 14 |
| I would not use Corian on a ceiling but for a wall in the shower
or a counter top it is great! I did my kitchen 9 years ago with
a Corian countertop and it is really easy to work with and finish
off. Scratches just sand out and if you nick it with a knife, then
it is not the end of the world. It was expensive but I don't recall
that it was more than 25% over the cost of formica. The formica
would be ready to be replaced now, while the corian is still like
new.
Caulk your joints with a clear or matching silicone sealer and it
is waterproof and neat. Use masking tape on both sides of your joint
with only about 1/32" of edge of Corian showing beside jjoint, then
caulk and wipe with your finger immediately to work it into the
joint. Let stand a few minutes, pull up tape and you are done.
|
12.56 | Cheaper alternatives, if you protect it ! | TONTO::EARLY | Bob_the_hiker :^) | Tue Jul 29 1986 13:21 | 30 |
| Maybe I'm just old fashioned, and this maybe it doesn't exactly
fit, but I have a counter top in the house I bought that was installed
several years ago, has but minor nicks (all major nicks were avoided
by using cutting boards). The material was cheap, and ths sidees
were finished with metal trim. The material looks like just plain
ole' linoleum (congoleum if you want to get pricey). Assuming
it was installed when the appliances were installed (in between
1955 and 1971), that puts it somewhere between 15 and 30 years old.
In some "Home <fixitup>Magazine", they had an issue which covered
all sorts (well, many types of coverings) for floor, ceiling, walls,
and of course bathrooms. Some of the coverings were:
WallPAPER on the FLOOR, Ceiling, and FLoor coverings on the WALLS,
CEILINGS, and other sorts of strange but attractive mixes. It
wasn't what so much what was used where, but HOW it was applied.
The Wallpaper on the floor was totally ceiled with Polyxxx varnish;
teh bathroom coverings were sealed with a varnish containing a
fungicide,and the wall coverings were just ordinary sorts of things
like favorite rugs, cardboard squares, splatterd painting on white
paper, newspapers, favorite photos, home_stenciled scenes,
etc.
The whole key is: How to protect it from unwanted destruction !
The magazine was either "Better Homes & Garden", or "Colonial Homes".
95% sure, anyhow.
bob
|
12.57 | DuPont/Corian - A Great Sink! | USMRW1::RKILGUS | | Wed Jul 30 1986 16:47 | 22 |
| RE: .7
I have a Corian bathroom vanity sink top. It has worn well, can
be repaired very easily.....I love it for that purpose. One problem
I would find in trying to hang the stuff on the ceiling is that
it would tend to be heavy, if it comes in 1/4" sheets...maybe lighter,
but how would you attach the sheets to the ceiling. More precisely,
how would you cover the nails, screws, etc? The other disadvantage
that I could see is that condensation would form a lot easier on
Corian that other conventional ceiling materials, and tend to drip
onto the floor which could create other potential problems.
As far as using Corian for the bath tub walls.....excellent, but
again, I don't know how you would stick the sheets to the wall except
for maybe with adhesive....I wouldn't try adhesive on the ceiling
though.
Just thought I would share my thoughts.....I'm new on the notes
file and am enjoying this note file quite a bit...a very good resource,
and very practical with all the "hands on experience".
ROB
|
12.58 | Another Corian owner | BRUTWO::COUTURE | | Thu Jul 31 1986 08:16 | 5 |
| I have it also in my bathroom and tub enclosure. There is a
piece on the ceiling and it (just like the walls are 1/4") was
put on with some sort of mastic compound. It has held up very
well.
|
12.59 | Boats use epoxy too! | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Tue Aug 05 1986 13:14 | 9 |
| We have painted our kitchen counter (covered with linoleum) with
epoxy paint. It wears like iron. Good for 5 yrs or more. Would think
that epoxy paint would be an excellent and cheap alternative to
Corian for the bathroom.
herb
|
12.60 | Use of Epoxy Paints? | CLOUD9::SPT_LEPAGE | | Wed Aug 06 1986 09:49 | 9 |
| Was the counter covered with linoloeum, as mentioned, or rather
Formica? I've got a counter-top that's pretty beat, but don't really
want to replace it just yet. Would epoxy paint work on Formica
as well? Also, is it easy to find in most paint stores, or do only
certain specialty stores carry it? Thanks.
Mark LePage
|
12.61 | Get it from a Boat Supply Store | NUWAVE::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Wed Aug 06 1986 11:17 | 5 |
| If you are going to repaint Formica, you should be sure to sand
the surface to rough it up. You can buy good epoxy paint from
a boat supply store, but it is very, very expensive.
-al
|
12.62 | More Question on Epoxy | CLOUD9::SPT_LEPAGE | | Wed Aug 06 1986 14:49 | 9 |
| What is very, very expensive? I don't believe I'd be using any
more than 1-2 quarts as I don't have that much counter space.
(Actually, I don't think I could use as much as 2 pints!).
Also, what kind of finish - glossy/flat, smooth/rough do you get
with an epoxy paint - I've never used them.
Mark
|
12.63 | Err, Ummm, "Boat Paint" in the kitchen ?\ | EUREKA::REG_B | The micro_wave popcorn gourmet | Wed Aug 06 1986 16:16 | 7 |
|
Better check whats in boat quality epoxy paint before using
it in a kitchen, *ANYWHERE* in a kitchen. I think the kinds of
anti-waterlife things I would want in a boat paint are the kinds
of anti me things that I would *NOT* want in a kitchen. And if you
ever sell, well it could be worse than having to remove all the
asbestos in the basement.
|
12.64 | Use Boat Deck, not Bottom Paint | NUWAVE::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Wed Aug 06 1986 17:17 | 11 |
| Re: .17
Boat paints come in different flavors. Do not buy the boat
*bottom* or anti-fouling type of paint. These types contain nasty
copper based additives to prevent algae and barnacle growth. You
want boat deck paint. This only comes in high-gloss and stands
up well to water abuse and UV. It will probably cost you about
3-4 times as much as "regular" paint, such as Benjamin Moore or
Dutch Boy, etc.
-al
|
12.65 | Here's what I did | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Tue Aug 12 1986 13:57 | 28 |
| My kitchen counter is linoleum. I also used epoxy paint to *delay*
replacing our 30 yr old bath tub (it required one helll of a lot
of marginally useful hard work to prepare the tub. The tub work
didn't work out all that well but I believe it was caused by my
poor paint job rather than that it is intrinsically a bad idea.
In each case(the counter and the tub), one "pkg" was enough. The
pkg comes in two cans, one the pigment, the other the bonding agent.
I don't remember the size can for sure but believe each can is a
quart -meybe a pint- As I remember -it was many yrs ago now- the
purchase was $25 for the pkg of two cans when a gallon of "standard"
paint was selling for around $10.00.
It is very high gloss and very smooth. Sears carries it, Spags carries
it of course (not tooo far from the fish and tackle counter), many
paint stores will carry it too.
Once the two cans are mixed together the result cures very quickly.
Make *absolutely* sure you have a gallon of the *correct* paint
remover/thinner handy before you start the job. You need to specify
that it will be used for epoxy. Standard paint thinner has zero
impact on cured epoxy. I did the bath tub late
on a Saturday afternoon and spilled some of the mixture...
good luck
herb
p.s. sorry for the delay
|
12.66 | Back to the original question | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Tue Aug 12 1986 15:38 | 13 |
| For years I have been planning to do the bathroom ceiling with epoxy
paint as a result of the experience gained doing our counter top
twice (at least 5 years apart). Haven't done it yet but am convinced
it is a fine idea. Requires careful ceiling preparation (certainly
scraping, probably sanding). The actual
application is quick and inexpensive. But have a good drop cloth
and somebody to watch for splattering who is holding a rag soaked in
the right "goop" (see previous note). Once you start don't stop
shouldn't take more than 15 minutes or so for a bathroom ceiling.
I plan on using a roller then throwing it away.
good luck
herb
|
12.75 | Putting in ceiling while enclosing porch | MKFSA::ESONIS | | Thu Aug 21 1986 08:46 | 49 |
| My ranch has an "integral"(?) sun porch, with an open area underneath.
i plan to eventually replace the combination windows on the sun-porch with
conventional windows, and extend the living area of the house out onto the
sunporch area. the first thing i'd like to do is cover the underside of the
sun porch floor joists so that there is a ceiling in the enclosed area below.
i've come up with some questions i can't answer while planning for this, and
would appreciate some advice......
____________________________________
/ \
/ \
/----------------------------------------\
| | ___ ___ ___ ___ |
| | | | | || || | |
| | |___| |__||___||___| | <-sunporch w/ storm/screen windows
| | |
|____________|_________________________|
| _________ | ___ || || ||
| | | | | | ||______||_______|| <- open porch area
| | | | | | || |
|_|________|_| | | |_________________|
questions:
what sort of material would be a suitable ceiling covering? (i've considered
using 3/8" t-111)
when putting ceiling covering up in the open porch
area, which now has only exposed floor joists, will i need to provide
ventilation similar to that provided by soffit vents? This area is exposed to
the outside at the moment, and it will be some time before i can close it in.
The previous owner of the house had put up some pink fiberglass insulation
(paper faced), and i've noticed that the paper is decaying due to the moisture
that collects on it when the air is damp..... i'd like to put some sort of
insulation before i add the ceiling covering, in hopes of keeping the floor
warmer in the enclosed area above, but i don't want to capture the moisture
inside.
If insulation can be used here, which type is best?
thanks in advance for your input.....
steve
|
12.76 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Thu Aug 21 1986 10:57 | 25 |
| Moisture barrier (the paper) goes toward the HEATED side, in this
case "up". From your description it sounds as though the vapor
barrier is down, which may be most of your problem. I've heard
that there is insulation specially designed for this particular
siituation with some sort of reverse tabs so the vapor barrier can
be up but you can staple it on the bottom. I've never seen any
or used it, but you might check around and see if you can find some.
If you can't one alternative is to staple polyethelene
sheets up between all the floor (ceiling from the bottom!) joists
then use unfaced insulation, held in place with short lengths of
coathanger wire just a bit too long to fit between the joists -
wedge the wires in so their natural spring holds them in place.
Or use insulation with a vapor barrier, put the vapor barrier on
top, and hold it in with the wires the same way. That probably
wouldn't be quite as good a vapor barrier, but I bet it would be
good enough. If you are going to redo the floor up above, put down
a sheet of polyethelene between the subfloor and the finished floor,
and solve the vapor barrier problem that way.
Fiberglass ought to work just fine. As far as what to cover it
with, I guess that's up to you. Vents might be a good idea - perhaps
one of those 2" round plug vents at the ends of each between-joist
space.
Steve
|
12.77 | | MKFSA::ESONIS | | Thu Aug 28 1986 09:35 | 5 |
| thanks for the advice. i think i'll go with the plastic vapor barrier
and unfaced insulation.
Ske
|
12.85 | Rough finished ceiling questions | REGAL::MILLIKEN | | Thu Oct 02 1986 14:11 | 19 |
| We are building a post-and-beam home with cathedral ceilings. The post and beam
frame is covered with stress-skin panels with blueboard on the interior. The
house is now being sheetrocked (interior partitions) and the quote included
taping and a primer coat on all the walls, as well as a finish on the cathedral
ceilings which consists of a thin coat of joint compound over the entire
surface (rough finished) and then painted.
This sounded great to us because it means we will not have to build staging or
whatever ourselves to get all the way up there and finish the ceiling ourselves
in an alternate manner, and the cost for this whole package was not very
much more than quotes for just drywall and taping of interior walls.
Now I am having second thoughts about what this will look like and wondered if
anyone knows what this "rough joint compound finish" looks like (I realize it's
probably a personal taste thing) but I would like to hear any pros or cons
anyone may have about this.
Carole
|
12.86 | rough joint compound finish | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Oct 02 1986 14:21 | 12 |
| I've seen this inside a closet. I think that's where it belongs.
Do you have a choice about this? Are there any exposed beams at
the ceiling?
It's a little hard to describe what it looks like, but it's kind
of like frosting on a cake. It's very easy to apply and it hides
imperfections in the ceiling.
Are they covering the posts and beams with stress-skin or are the
panels just in between the posts and beams?
|
12.112 | Replacing Stained ceiling section | AIMHI::RODENHISER | | Fri Oct 03 1986 11:18 | 28 |
| Our upstairs bathroom had a nagging leak that stained the
bathroom ceiling and top of the abutting wall below it.
The affected area is stained, is blistering and has swelled.
The ceiling is heavily textured - it has those particles of
plaser? bits suspended in the paint.
I fixed the leak - now it's time to fix the damage.
The affected area is about 8" x 6" - it seems like it is
going to have to be replaced (versus "touched up") because
of the blistering and swelling.
I have the following questions that I hope somebody out there
can give me soe guidance on:
1. can I just cut out the affected area and secion in another
piece of sheetrock (using mesh, joint compound, etc.)
or does a much larger section of the ceiling have to be
replaced (eg. are their recommended minimum sizes of
sheetrock insertions?)?
2. what's the best way to refinish the new area of ceiling
to blend in with the rough, rocky-textured ceiling around
it?
Any tips/suggestions/ideas would be appreciated.
Dick
|
12.113 | I've done it several times | FSTVAX::HARDEN | | Fri Oct 03 1986 12:15 | 18 |
| As far as replacing the small area of sheetrock you are in the oiece
of cake category.
You simply cut out the bad and cut a piece of new that fits and
screw it tto a piece of stapping that is longer than the hole is
wide, then slip it into the hole and drive a couple of screws into
the strapping on either side of the hole.
As far as the refinishing goes you're on your own from my end. No
matter what you do or how good you are you will have a nice fresh
spot on the ceiling that stands out like a nose on your cheek. If
you are able to get the texture matched up pretty good then you
might be able to disguise the fix by repainting the entire ceiling
with a spray painter.
Have a ball,
-boB
|
12.114 | Thanks | AIMHI::RODENHISER | | Fri Oct 03 1986 12:27 | 3 |
| Thanks for the reply - matching the texture and color of the ceiling
seems like it will be the biggest challenge. Do they sell paint
with the flecks of plaster (or, whatever it is) mixed in it?
|
12.87 | | 4GL::MILLIKEN | | Fri Oct 03 1986 13:06 | 22 |
| Do you have a choice about this? Are there any exposed beams at
the ceiling?
Are they covering the posts and beams with stress-skin or are the
panels just in between the posts and beams?
*** I can probably just tell them to leave the ceilings
*** alone and then we can finish them ourselves; however
*** we have so much work we are doing already that it sure
*** would be nice to let them take care of it. Also, access
*** to this height will be difficult.
*** Yes, there are beams exposed every four feet. The stress
*** skin is put on the outside so the beams are all exposed,
*** sort of like this (only with the slope of the roof):
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
|__| |__| |__| |__| |__|
So the "skip troweling" as they call it will be on the
surface in between the beams.
|
12.88 | A repulsive ceiling | SMAUG::FLEMING | | Fri Oct 03 1986 13:14 | 4 |
| I'd prefer not to have this in my closets, thank you. It's no secret
why contractors recommend it. It's fast and can be applied by
anyone who has hands. It will also hide gross surface imperfections.
The net result is a hideous mess that requires new walls to correct.
|
12.115 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Fri Oct 03 1986 13:53 | 10 |
| Has the textured ceiling in your bathroom gotten mildewed yet?
If you have masochistic tendancies you'll love it.
My personal suggestion is to tear it all out and put in a smooth
ceiling, now that you have an excuse to do it.
"Texture" or "sand" paint should be available at any good paint
store. Personally I think it's an invention of the devil, put on
earth to get us ready for hell, but maybe that's because I had to
deal with a mildewed textured-ceiling bathroom once....
Steve
|
12.116 | Mildew - doesn't | AIMHI::RODENHISER | | Fri Oct 03 1986 14:03 | 5 |
| The bathroom in question is only a 1/2 bath (no tub/shower) so
mildew would not be a problem. The upstairs bathroom has not
experienced the mildew problem (yet - hopefully never). I've
heard of those problems and share your thoughts on its likely
origin and intent.
|
12.117 | texture paint | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Oct 03 1986 17:14 | 7 |
| I've used textured paint in the form of a dry mix you add to
paint after you get the right color. You can add just enough
to get the texture to match what's already there.
Except, I agree you should tear down the whole ceiling and get
rid of the texture garbage.
|
12.89 | ceilings | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Oct 03 1986 17:18 | 6 |
| Sounds like you have the same kind of ceilings I have. I put
6" T&G boards diagonally between the beams. But sheetrock looks
good there too. But my advice is not to let them use rough
joint compound finish.
Who's doing this construction? A post & beam company?
|
12.118 | repainting a textured ceiling? | SQM::MARCONIS | | Sun Oct 05 1986 14:16 | 8 |
| While we are on the subject of textured ceilings:
Our living room has a textured ceiling, and I am wondering how to go about
repainting it. Is it ok to just paint over it with regular non-textured
white ceiling paint?
Thanks,
Joe M.
|
12.119 | Sprayed ceiling experiences and fixes | COLORS::BOWKER | | Mon Oct 06 1986 10:37 | 26 |
| I swear, sprayed textured ceilings are only for the convenience
of the installing contractor. The technique hids a multitude of
sins and is really quick to apply.
You can roll over these ceiling with ceiling paint, but... when
I did it I found that instead of the normal roller spatter, I had
chunks, globs, and a general mess all over the place.
I had an insurance repair on a bedroom ceiling once (a mover put
their foot through an attic floor). The repair was done by cutting out
a piece of ceiling that corresponded to the strapping. A 4" joint
compound knife was then used to scrape off the texture spray back
another foot and a half. The patch was screwed in, taped, j.c.'d, beveled,
and sanded. The contractor then sprayed the patched area. There
was a slight color mismatch (clean spray vs. 4 years of aging).
I had a small bath/laundry ceiling in the same building that I
repaired myself in much the same way. However on this one I just
scraped the entire ceiling (no big deal, but a bit dusty), patched,
and rolled with regular ceiling paint.
If the ceiling is stained but not soft, bubbled, or bulging (and
the cause of the leak is fixed) use a stain killer paint first. If
you use latex based paint only, the stain will bleed through.
..good luck /roger
|
12.120 | Scraping Ceilings | CLT::BENNISON | | Mon Oct 06 1986 10:58 | 16 |
| Isn't there a difference, however, between actual textured paint
and the stuff the contractors spray on? I've scraped all my
ceilings. But I wouldn't call what I scraped of "paint". Elsewhere
in this notes file I believe they've discussed this stuff, but I
forget the name. The best way to get this stuff off is to use
a plastic plant mist sprayer filled with water, a wide putty knife,
a step ladder and plastic waste basket. I spray about a 3X3 foot
section of ceiling. Then before the water has much chance to soak
into the plasterboard I scrape the goop off, keeping the waste basket
under the putty knife so that the goop just falls into the bucket.
This method produces NO dust and the only mess is when I miss the
waste basket. I don't even bother with a drop cloth unless I'm
working over carpeting.
If you really have textured PAINT on your ceiling, you got a whole
different problem.
|
12.90 | skip trowel finish in use | COLORS::BOWKER | | Mon Oct 06 1986 11:15 | 24 |
| I've got what I supose is the 'skip trowel' finish in between the
exposed beams on the ceilings and walls of my place. The look is
OK on the ceiling, it's rustic and matches the hand hewn beams.
The ceilings and walls are blue board which was skim-coated with
plaster with the skip trowel finish. I assume joint compound would
be must softer, but the look would be the same.
The most redeeming quality of the ceiling is that it's VERY easy to
repair and match the finish.
In some areas of the house, this finish has been painted several
times, still retaining the texture and shadow detail.
The only real negative is having the finish on walls. It's rough
in some areas especially if you brush against it. Cleaning around
wall switches and where my 4 yr old trails his hands (this weekend
he was belly sliding in a loam pile) is a real trial.
If it were my choice, skip troweled ceilings are ok (especially as
compared with sprayed ceilings), but I'd avoid doing the walls.
/r.b.
|
12.91 | Does anyone know how to get rid of it? | TOPDOC::PRESCOTT | | Tue Oct 07 1986 15:25 | 9 |
| This sounds like what I have in my 150-yr old house. The next to
last owner before us was a builder, and I suspect he put this
stuff on ALL the ceilings because it was easy, and he thought it
looked "rustic" and "Early American." It really does not go with
my house and I would love to see it go. But we have acres of it.
Is there any way to get rid of it? (I have no idea what's
underneath it, although I suspect it's old, cracked plaster
ceilings.)
|
12.92 | depends | CLT::BENNISON | | Tue Oct 07 1986 16:08 | 8 |
| There's some discussion of this elsewhere. If you can scrape your
fingernail across the surface of your ceiling and have all the
powdery white stuff fall off, then you got an easy problem, like
I had. If, on the other hand, pieces of fingernail fall to the
floor, you got a different problem. Maybe somebody else knows how
to fix this second problem short of tearing out the ceiling. I
don't. If you have the easy first problem then see note 446.8.
|
12.93 | I think I've got a real problem | TOPDOC::PRESCOTT | | Tue Oct 07 1986 16:20 | 2 |
| I've got the hard stuff and it appears to have been applied with
a shovel.
|
12.121 | A new theory on the cause of mildew!! | AIMHI::RODENHISER | | Tue Oct 07 1986 17:09 | 12 |
| On the issue of whether the ceiling has textured paint or something
else. The best way I can describe the ceiling is to imagine that
the contractor basted cans of 2nd-quality Bacos (synthetic bacon
bits, finely ground) with white paint - just enough paint to cover
the red dye #2 - then loaded the mix into a spray unit, pointed
the wand at the ceiling, stood back and let it go.
This evolutionary theory could shed some new light on what many
people believe to be the cause of mildewing ceilings. Perhaps
it's merely a case of fermenting Bacos?? Has anybody ever noticed
a faint bacon-odor in their bathrooms?
|
12.122 | It's better "off" in the long run! | CSCMA::PINARD | | Wed Oct 08 1986 12:05 | 10 |
| My duplex has sprayed ceilings, and I remodeled the bathrooms, scraping
the sprayed garbage off the ceilings, that had been collecting mold
when I bought the place. The texture stuff came off pretty good,
and with a little sanding and a little touch up with joint compound
on the seams, then sealer primer and painted it looks great.
I did paint other texture ceilings in the house using a fussy roller,
you have to be careful not to get the ceiling too wet or it will
start falling off in chunks. I wish I could get ambishious enought
to scrap it of my kitchen dining room!
Jean
|
12.94 | re 445.6 ..getting rid of it | RAINBO::BOWKER | | Wed Oct 08 1986 14:44 | 20 |
| I talked with a part-time plasterer the other day about skimming
over a skip-coat finish with a smooth layer of plaster. He said
that they could probably hit the ceiling with a bonding agent and add
another skim coat of plaster that was smooth.
He also said that he HATED to do smooth ceilings. All the overhead
work was a real killer.
I'm torn. I don't want my ceilings looking like neo Costa del Sol,
but on the other hand, the Holiday Inn look is out too. I'll just
live with it until whenever.
BTW. If it's still there, the Warren Tavern in Charlestown, Ma
has plastered walls that were made to have an aged effect. They
hired novice plasterers to get an uneven look, added pigment to
the plaster to give it an ivory color, and then 'scribed' cracks into
the walls.
/rb
|
12.95 | hey.....they're not that bad! | MAXWEL::BROSNIHAN | BRIAN | Wed Oct 08 1986 16:37 | 8 |
| Well I'll confess that I had a plasterer come in and apply textured
ceilings throughout my home. He did it in an orderly fashion however.
It is applied with a trowl and put on very thin (~1/8 inch) . I
chose this because the house is old and it hides waves nicely. I
guess it looks swirled but it's not uniform. I really don't care
for the blown up stuff, and I'm not in to the stalagtite look, but
this really does'nt look bad. It also costs a fortune to have a
smooth cieling done.
|
12.96 | Smooth Ceilings | SMAUG::FLEMING | | Thu Oct 09 1986 09:33 | 10 |
| In response to .-1
I was once screwed out of a fortune for smooth ceilings, actually
it was $700 over the cost of regular sand finished ceilings. Not
exactly sure why they cost so much. It took two plasterers about 5
hours to do them. That was three coats on two ceilings ,one about 24x14
and one 12x24. It did look awarkward but not $700 worth. The plasterer
admitted that they look nice but felt they were only for those who
'didn't care how things costs'. I care how much things cost but
still feel it was worth it.
|
12.97 | | SARAH::MCWILLIAMS | | Wed Oct 15 1986 07:38 | 7 |
| While the subject is hot, most of my ceilings need refinishing.
Is it considered "slipshod or "tacky" to just nail up some new
sheetrock over the old cracked,uneven ceilings and then paint?
Steve
|
12.98 | | MAXWEL::BROSNIHAN | BRIAN | Wed Oct 15 1986 14:11 | 4 |
| I've had people tell me that they went over an existing cieling
with blueboard to save on a mess. It is tough to locate beams and
ferring though. I also would'nt recommend painting over blueboard
for a ceiling, unless it's in a closet.
|
12.99 | | REGAL::MILLIKEN | | Fri Oct 17 1986 13:21 | 5 |
| Re .13
Why wouldn't you recommend painting over blueboard?
|
12.100 | | MAXWEL::BROSNIHAN | BRIAN | Fri Oct 17 1986 13:50 | 6 |
| Re: .14... why?
Painting a ceiling without some kind of
plaster on it would ( I think) look terrible!
Walls are'nt as noticable, But if you do a
ceiling, your going to see every seam, nail -
/screw hole as soon as you turn light/lamp on.
|
12.101 | | LATOUR::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Fri Oct 17 1986 16:41 | 20 |
| re .15
The only reason a nontextured ceiling shows flaws when you turn
on a light is because the light wasn't available when you were
finishing the ceiling.
The best way to spot flaws while taping/jointing wallboard is to
have a bright light source close to the surface. While working on
a ceiling, this means that you should connect a work light to the
ceiling fixture connection, hanging close to the ceiling. If you're
satisfied with the finish then, you'll be even more satisfied when
the paint is on and the real light fixture is installed. If you
don't have the proper light to spot flaws while you're working,
you'll usually get a big surprise the first time you flick the switch.
BTW, this approach also works great for walls. Just keep a portable
light close to the wall, so that the light shines at a very shallow
angle to the wall, and the bumps and hollows will jump out at you.
|
12.102 | | 4GL::MILLIKEN | | Fri Oct 17 1986 17:24 | 12 |
| Thanks for suggestions. I was beginning to feel that whatever
we decided to do with the ceilings it wouldn't be the right thing.
What we decided was to eliminate the joint-compound ceiling and
have them tape and paint the ceiling. Actually there is only one
seam around the ceiling, about 2-3 feet up from the eaves. The
stress-skin panels were huge, so there was only this one seam across
each panel. As they finish it off, we will be sure to keep the
light on the area.
Thanks!
|
12.123 | | SUPER::MATTHEWS | Don't panic | Sat Nov 01 1986 23:03 | 5 |
| About painting textured ceilings -- maybe a brush is better than
a roller. I've used a brush to repaint a (small) textured ceiling
and it worked beautifully.
Val
|
12.124 | Try a long nap (roller)... | SAVAGE::LOCKRIDGE | | Mon Nov 03 1986 13:20 | 19 |
| As for painting a textured ceiling, you want to use a long hair
roller made for just such a purpose. A short haired roller (i.e.
for walls, flat ceiling, etc) won't 'get down' to the base of the
glop on the ceiling. If it is **REALLY** textured (to the point
where one cut a finger on or use it as a grater :-) ) you might
have to use a brush or spray it.
When I had a closet built into my garage off of my enlarged living
room, the person who did the drywall (I did part of my basement and
swore never again - I greatly dislike the mess and besides have other
'fun' things to do) suggested that he put a textured finish on the
walls and ceiling [of the closet] ostensibly to make it easier for
me - "you won't have to paint it, it will be all done." Wrong!
Nothing like a whole closet full of unpainted textured drywall mud.
Actually it was easier FOR HIM. He didn't have to tape any of the
joints - just covered them with a skim coat and them "textured" it.
-Bob
|
12.127 | Peeling Ceiling | SNO78A::ZORBAS | Give me SPECIALIST or give me DEATH | Tue Nov 11 1986 20:17 | 13 |
| G'day,
I am about to undertake the task of painting my house. However,
some of the plaster ceilings are flaking (peeling,...whatever) and is
severe in some cases.
Any suggestions on the best way to approach this problem?
paintingly yours,
Stuart Zorbas
Sydney, Australia.
|
12.128 | Is paint pealing or plaster chipping (big difference) | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Nov 12 1986 08:34 | 6 |
| If you're ceilings are that bad (only you can really judge), you may
want to simply sheetrock over them and paint the sheetrock. If the
current plaster is chipping out, patching would probably only fix one
area and later others defects could appear.
-mark
|
12.129 | Looks like new ceilings to me! | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Wed Nov 12 1986 13:00 | 11 |
| Our house is 30 years old. All of the walls and ceilings were
plastered. Apparently as a result of settling, cracks have developed
over time in every ceiling in the house. I have tried diligently
to dig out the entire length of the cracks and respackle. In each
case the cracks have reformed. In two cases we had ceilings completely
replastered. In both these cases, cracks have formed again where
they had been before.
I believe the only solution is to replace the ceilings as .1 suggested.
Sure would like to hear some convincing counter arguments
herb
|
12.134 | Sealer for wood ceiling? | XCELR8::RITACCO | | Wed Dec 03 1986 10:15 | 10 |
| My husband just installed a cedar tongue and groove ceiling
in our bathroom. The question is, should we put some sort
of polyurethane to seal it or just to leave it alone????
I don't know of anybody who has a celing like this, so I
thought this would be the best place to ask.
Thanks,
Donna
|
12.135 | | POWPAC::CONNELL | | Wed Dec 03 1986 11:56 | 17 |
| You didn't mention if the cedar was the aromatic type but I'm going
to assume that it isn't.
I think I would give it some type water protection, polyurethane
or equivilent. I would be mostly afraid of the stains that would
occur on bare wood from condensation.
If you like the natural look of the wood, maybe you could consider
a clear, water repellant, preservative-- ala Cuprinol.
BTW, if it is the aromatic type of cedar, I wouldn't do anything
to it. An occasional light sanding will get rid of the water stains
and bring back that great smell.
Good luck...
--Mike
|
12.136 | T&G cedar | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Wed Dec 03 1986 12:09 | 4 |
| What does T&G cedar cost? I was thinking of doing the inside of
my closet with it. Is this the stuff that's real thin, like
1/2 inch or less?
|
12.137 | wouldn't it warp? | MANTIS::PEARCE | Linda Pearce | Wed Dec 03 1986 12:52 | 7 |
| Wouldn't the ceiling warp if only one side was sealed?
We did one side of our pine cabinets and that's what
happened. I know cedar is a harder wood, so maybe
it wouldn't. How about an oil that will allow the
wood to breath but also protect?
|
12.138 | re: .2 | MILRAT::FARRELL | Thirty Six Bit Paleontologist.. | Wed Dec 03 1986 16:18 | 6 |
| re: .2
Price ranges from $20.00 - $30.00 per box. The board is 1/4" thick and
fairly easy to install....
|
12.139 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Wed Dec 03 1986 16:48 | 5 |
| I think I'd seal it with something. If you got a mildew infestation
on unsealed boards you might have a problem getting rid of it.
Since you'll be sealing the "moist" side of the boards, my guess
is that if anything sealing them will help prevent warping...but
it's just a guess.
|
12.140 | Cedar T&G | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Wed Dec 03 1986 16:54 | 6 |
| re: .4
> Price ranges from $20.00 - $30.00 per box.
How many square feet is that?
|
12.147 | CRACKS IN THE CEILING | VAXINE::GORMAN | | Wed Dec 03 1986 21:49 | 10 |
| I'm in the process of redoing my living room. I have a 75 yr. old
house. The problem I have is the ceilings. They have cracks in them.
I don't want to go with the rough look. I want to keep it smooth.
How should I hide the cracks so they don't reappear in a year.
In the past I have tried using plaster to hide them but they come
through in time. Should I tape the cracks. I really don't want to
put up new sheet rock.
Art
|
12.148 | I think you've gotta tape | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 04 1986 08:29 | 10 |
| I can't imagine any way other than taping the cracks. If you do this,
you'll have to make sure to remove enough to form a trough for the tape
and jointing compound so you'll have a level finish when done. I've
done this before my sanding the crack with a belt sander. I literally
remove the paper and some of gypsum. Then I put in the tape (I prefer
the mesh rather than paper) and joint away.
BUT -- wanna talk about a mess? Start sanding and watch the dust fly!
-mark
|
12.149 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Thu Dec 04 1986 08:48 | 6 |
| If you use the self_sticking mesh, and feather the joint out to
extreme distances, you don't have to gouge a trough. Besides, if
you gouge through the paper surface on wallboard, you're proabaly
removing more reinforcement than the new tape is adding.
I've used this method on butt (untapered) joints with great success.
|
12.141 | maybe wait | ROLL::CIAVOLA | | Thu Dec 04 1986 11:27 | 6 |
|
re:.2 and .4
Watch out. We priced some cedar clapboards recently. The cost
was outrageous! Grossman's told me that there was a strike going
on right now.
|
12.150 | Make sure you know what you're working with first | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Thu Dec 04 1986 11:37 | 9 |
| Chances are if you live in a 75 year old house the ceiling isn't
comprised of blueboard or sheetrock, but mohair plaster. I've had
the same symptoms you've had and found that you can run a can opener
along the crack to clean it out. Just apply joint compound (probably
takes about three applications due to shrinking ) to this area, sand
it down between applications, and presto apply the paint. I did
this 4 years ago to a ceiling and it looks as good as new.
Good luck.
|
12.142 | Cedar | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Dec 04 1986 12:39 | 10 |
| We're not talking about cedar clapboards here. If you want cedar
clapboards, go to Lancaster/Sterling Lumber in Sterling, MA.
I doubt that you'll find any cedar clapboards at Grossmans.
Two weeks ago the price at Sterling was up to 48 cents/bd foot.
That's a little higher than usual, but not too bad.
How much is T&G cedar per bd/ft?
|
12.151 | try this stuff.... | MAXWEL::BROSNIHAN | BRIAN | Thu Dec 04 1986 13:01 | 5 |
| I bought tapeless joint compound at Plywood Ranch. I used it for
the seams on a closet I built, and for where the sheet-rock met
the cieling. I used no tape, and I have no cracks. I would imagine
that it would work as well on other cracks. It does cost ~7 bucks
for a gallon container, so it's not cheap but it works great!
|
12.143 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Thu Dec 04 1986 13:23 | 4 |
|
We (U.S.) are currently waging a trade war with Canada which involves
wood products. Expect prices of cedar clapboards, shakes, etc to
become quite unreasonable.
|
12.144 | Price for T&G cedar | BCSE::SPT_LEPAGE | | Thu Dec 04 1986 16:30 | 6 |
| Sunday's Manchester Union Leader included a flyer from Somerville
Lumber. Their price for 3/8" (I think) T&G cedar was $18.95 per
17 sq ft box. I believe each piece is a uniform length/width.
-Mark LePage
|
12.152 | Doesn't sound like a good deal to me | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 04 1986 16:38 | 13 |
| re:-1
I'm a little confused about why one would want tapeless compound? I do
know there are concerns about paper tape trapping air under it and
messing up the job. That is why I bought a roll of the mesh. If I
recall it cost around 5 or 6 dollars at Spags and I got enough to do a
14X20 room with a 14 foot high ceiling and still had around 1/3 of a
roll less. Wouldn't this be a lot cheaper than spending $7 for a gallon
of compound?
Or am I missing something?
-mark
|
12.153 | re: -1 | MAXWEL::BROSNIHAN | BRIAN | Mon Dec 08 1986 12:29 | 7 |
| You are right... it is cheaper but where I added a closet
to an existing room, I did'nt want to have to tape the cieling
or against the other walls. If I had done it that way, I would
have had to joint compound over the tape on the walls and the
ceiling, hence sanding, painting etc. As I mentioned earlier,
it would be good for cracks because you would'nt have to tape
the crack and make it look so obvious.
|
12.154 | Applying texture paint to a ceiling, help? | MILRAT::SUTTON | | Tue Dec 09 1986 22:53 | 15 |
| I'm in the final stages of finishing off the lower level of my
split entry, and am having some difficulty with the finish work
on the ceiling.
Specifically, I've decided to texture paint the ceiling. (No
comments from the peanut gallery!!) A drop ceiling is out, due
to clearance constraints, so I've installed sheetrock. I've
primed the surface, and am ready to apply the texture. Now
comes the problem: as I am applying the paint, the texture stuff
accumulates at the edges of the roller - ridges. Now, ridges are
fine for potato chips, but not for my ceiling, thank you.
Any suggestions? Thinning the texture paint? Drop back 5 and punt?
- John
|
12.155 | This may help | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Wed Dec 10 1986 09:00 | 8 |
| You probably shouldn't be going in the same direction when painting
a ceiling. Try going in a north to south direction, then east to
west.
Also, are you using a roller for texture paint? They're quite a
bit different than a regular roller.
Steve
|
12.156 | | GRAEME::WELLS | Phil Wells | Wed Dec 10 1986 10:09 | 11 |
| A friend of mine show me this, and its kinda neet.
First, take a 5 gallon container of joint compount. Remove about 2 1/2
gallons and add white paint. Then add vermiculite. Mix this up.
He applies it with a trowel, and uses a 4" paint brush to add swirls.
Once the surface is dry, take a broom and sweep it.
The result is a plaster-like textured surface.
Phil
|
12.157 | more details | HBOMB4::SUTTON | Just another onionhead... | Wed Dec 10 1986 12:17 | 23 |
|
I guess a little more explanation is needed:
I picked up some "texture paint" at Somerville Lumber - this stuff
is a fairly thick concoction, with some sort of aggregate material
added in. The instructions on the bucket call for using a 1/2 inch
nap roller (by the way, I did try the loop-nap roller, to no avail)
to apply the stuff.
The indicated coverage for a 2-gallon bucket is 120 sq ft +/-, and
I did half of a 24x14 ceiling with half a bucket! It seems that
the material is too thick, so that it won't stay on the roller long
enough for me to transfer it to the ceiling surface.
I suppose, worst case, I'm out 18 bucks (plus whatever it costs
to get some other material for the surface) - but I'd like to try
using this stuff.
Any more suggestions?
Thanks,
- John
|
12.158 | HEATED OR NOT? | CSMADM::MAY | | Wed Dec 10 1986 13:39 | 6 |
| BY ANY CHANCE IS YOUR DOWNSTAIRS HEATED OR IS IT COLD. IF COLD,
THAT MAY BE WHATS MAKING YOUR PAINT ACT FUNNY.
HOPE THIS HELPS
BRUCE
|
12.159 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Wed Dec 10 1986 16:26 | 8 |
|
After creating nothing but a terrible mess with texture paint, I
finally did all of my upstairs with sand paint (Sears brand). It
is not as thick as texture paint, so the texture is not as deep,
but it did hide some minor mistakes quite nicely. The roller for
this stuff does not look like a shag rug, but has lots of tiny bristles
that stick straight out (also by Sears).
|
12.160 | spray | PAPPAS::JIM | Jim Pappas | Wed Dec 10 1986 23:21 | 24 |
| Go to Taylor rental (or even better, Rheault in Leominster) an rent
a compressor, hopper gun, 1/2" drill and mixer drill attchment. This
should set you back about $25-$50. Then buy a 40lb bag or two of
textured ceiling spray. This contains mostly vermiculite and some
other powder that disolves in the 5 gal of water that you must add.
For good measure, substitute a gallon of paint for one of the gallons
of water. Then, scoop the goop into the hopper gun and let loose.
You will find tht it is the easiest job tht you have attempted to
date.
I finished my entire basement myself and was ready to sub this
task out to a pro. With a little caoxing from a friend, I tried
it myself. Believe me, it is so simple, it is impossible to goof
up. I taped plastic all around the room to simplify cleanup and
I recommend that you do this. The pros just spray but it is worth
the extra time and expense to put up the plastic.
I did two rooms plus a hallway in less than 4 hours. Most of the
time was taping the plastic to the walls.
Give me a call if you want to be talked through this. It takes
me too long to type. (dtn 225 6625)
Jim Pappas
|
12.161 | | THORBY::MARRA | John 3:3 is right. | Thu Dec 11 1986 08:18 | 12 |
|
In trying to keep this in the public arena...
I want to 'popcorn' my family room as well...
I have the compressor, the hopper gun (I think? - can I use a sand
blaster gun? or do I need a real hopper gun?), and all the rest.
Is it really that easy? Just mix and spray?
.dave.
|
12.162 | Thanks for the help so far! | MILRAT::SUTTON | line read line | Thu Dec 11 1986 13:46 | 14 |
|
re .4 - the paint had sat in some colder weather. I had kept it in
the garage for a while, but I brought it into the near-finished room
a couple of days before starting. It sat about 8 feet from a fired-up
woodstove, so I daresay it had warmed up. Could the stay in the
garage have affected it?
re .6 - Ah, yes, the popcorn method. I'd thought of it, but figured
I could get away with this stuff. <deep sigh>
Hey, Dave - can I borrow your equipment?? (-:
- John
|
12.163 | | THORBY::MARRA | John 3:3 is right. | Thu Dec 11 1986 13:50 | 2 |
|
got a 15 amp 220 line?
|
12.164 | Keep paint warm | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Thu Dec 11 1986 14:21 | 5 |
| re .8
If the paint had a chance to freeze while it was in the garage,
it's probably garbage now, even warmed up (kinda like trying to
uncurdle cottage cheese).
|
12.165 | Taylor's Prices for: Spraying equipment, info on stud guns | ISBG::POWELL | Reed Powell - LCG Marketing - 297-4261 | Sun Dec 14 1986 22:35 | 26 |
| I was at Taylor's in Westboro this weekend renting something else,
and since I'm considering this same projec{, I asked about their
prices for the equipment:
1 hp compressor $26/day
Spray Gun $10/day
cleaning charge $5/day waived if you cl{an it good enough.
I have a brochure on the equipment, which includes a list of the
brand names of materials it willhandle - anyone wanting a copy just
send me mail (but better do it soon{ vacation time is comiing).
BTW, rather than find the old note which talked about using stud
guns to lay strapping for floor, here is an addendum to that subject:
I forgot to mention that if you are going to rent one of the Remington
Powder Actuated Stud Guns, you must have a valid FID (Firearms
Identification card). You get this at your local police department
In Shrewsbury all I did was fill out a form. They do some kind
{of checking on you (bad news Arlo Guthrie) and you can get the card
in a week. They give you an acknowledgement of the application
- and Taylor's actually accepted that for the FID card. Taylor's
is the only place sticky about obeying the law - neither Somerville
nor Spags ever asked for it when I bought charges.
-reed
|
12.166 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Mon Dec 15 1986 11:17 | 3 |
| If it was latex paint and it froze, you are almost certainly out
of luck. Freezing breaks the emulsion of water and pigment, and
as far as I know there is no way to re-mix it satisfactorily.
|
12.167 | Worked fine for me. | CHAPLN::SULLIVAN | Spontaneity has a time and place | Tue Dec 16 1986 13:12 | 6 |
| I used the originally mentioned texture paint on a closet in my
house. The area is mostly sloped ceiling so it had to hold well.
Worked fine with a roller. I did thin it with water and put
it on in two coats though. Two years later it still looks fine.
Mark
|
12.168 | Got it to work! | MILRAT::SUTTON | line read line | Tue Dec 16 1986 13:13 | 19 |
|
Whew! I'm safe!
Over the weekend, I tried a little something: knowing that I could
clean up the roller with water, I figured - "hey, this is a rough
room, I'll try thinning the paint with a tad of water..."
Worked like a charm. I added about a cup and a half of water to
a two-gallon bucket of ceiling texture, and voila! I actually got
the stuff to apply and look reasonable!
I sincerely doubt that the garage got cold enough to freeze (darn
close, though...), but perhaps _approaching_ freezing affected the
stuff.
Anyway, thanks to all forthe suggestions (I know what to do next
time.).
P.S. - re .9: 220, 221 - whatever it takes. (-:
|
12.145 | 1x6 T&G cedar prices | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Fri Jan 30 1987 15:52 | 13 |
| Just found this notes conference. One more to get me into trouble
:-) Anyway...
I'm in the process of adding a family room, with a spa, to our house.
Because of the moisture that the spa will generate when the cover
is off, I elected to do the interior of the room with T&G cedar.
The cedar I got was red(wood) cedar, 1x6 T&G. I got it for $.83
a bd-ft. Most places I have seen carry it for between $.90 and
$1.00 a bd-ft. BTW, I got my cedar tat East Coast Lumber in East
Hampstead, NH.
- Mark
|
12.146 | Watco Sealer | USSCSL::PASCUCCI | | Tue Feb 03 1987 16:56 | 8 |
| Being really behind in my noting I have just seen this topic.
Reguarding the first question on sealing... I used "Watco" oil sealer
for a screened in porch ceiling. It looks real good. Also easy
to apply. I like it much better than poly, at least for this
application. If you haven't done the ceiling yet and are interested
I can get the can out of the cellar and gibe you a more complete
name of the product.
|
12.174 | Ceiling Marks/stains | NUHAVN::SUKIEL | | Mon Mar 02 1987 09:19 | 11 |
| I bought a home in Nashua about 6 months ago, when looking it over
I noticed two identical stains on the first floor bathroom ceiling
which is below the upsatirs bathroom. I asked the home inspector
what they might be and he really didnm't know. The stains have not
grown since I purchased the house, however this weekend I notices
another stain in a different area. I can't recall if this stain
was also there then. I'm concerned and would like to have it checked
out but don't want to pay big $$ if it'd nothing really bad. Does
anyone have any advise or know of someone who could come and take
a peak to see what it may be? I don't see any water leaking in the
upstairs bath... Thanks
|
12.175 | Numerous possibilities... | DSSDEV::AMBER | | Mon Mar 02 1987 10:30 | 8 |
| Lots of things could cause the stains. What color are they? Is
there a shower in the first floor bath? Do the stains feel wet
(is the sheeetrock soft)? Which raises another question - what's
the ceiling material.
It could well be that the previous owner had a problem, corrected
it, simply painted over the spots, and now they are bleeding through.
|
12.176 | a little more info | LEHIGH::SUKIEL | | Mon Mar 02 1987 11:04 | 7 |
| The stains are light brown, there is no shower in the first floor
bath, the stains don't feel wet but I was able to chip some plaste
away. The ceiling material sheet rock I believe with a coat of plaster
over it.. a swirl type look.
|
12.177 | Try painting with KILZ (TM) | DSSDEV::AMBER | | Mon Mar 02 1987 12:45 | 11 |
| With no apparent moisture from either above or below and the light
brown stains, I'd suspect the problem is minor. Might just be the
nails or screws have bled through (especially if the spots are about
16" o.c.). My fix would be to go to the hardware store and get
a small can of KILZ (I think that's the spelling), brush or roll
it on, and see what happens.
Without going into too many details, I once painted a smoke blackened
masonary wall with KILZ; one coat made a black wall sort of white,
the second coat and you'd never know...
|
12.178 | I'll give it a try | PENNSY::SUKIEL | | Mon Mar 02 1987 13:57 | 1 |
| I'll give it a try!! thanks...
|
12.179 | Bleach? | NUWAVE::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Mon Mar 02 1987 18:08 | 3 |
| Would a spritzing of bleach get rid of the light brown spots?
-al
|
12.180 | -< seal it / repaint >- | CLUSTA::MATTHES | | Mon Mar 02 1987 20:31 | 11 |
| Don't recommend bleaching. My experience has shown that the brown
stain will keep coming through and attempts to bleach just re-wet
a material that doesn't like to be wet in the first place. The
more you wet it the weaker it gets. The best technique I know of
is to seal it with a shellac or varnish like (TM ZAR ??) to stop
any further bleeding. Then a coat of paint to match the rest of
the ceiling or just re-paint the entire ceiling.
As to the cause...leaky upstairs toilet that now has a new
ring ?? Wouldn't happen to be circular or arc-like stains. The
stains on parts of the circumference of a circle ??
|
12.181 | a little bleach goes a long way | BOEHM::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Mar 03 1987 08:50 | 7 |
| I agree with .5 about bleach. I have a plaster ceiling that had a shower
leak over it. I didn't want to paint it because I like the look of the raw
plaster. A healthy coating of bleach via a plant sprayer did the trick. Only
problem was I forgot what goes up comes down and I wound up bleaching part of
a chair!
-mark
|
12.182 | sweating? | USMRW7::KHUNT | | Tue Mar 03 1987 09:11 | 5 |
|
I had a similiar type of stain, which was, I believe, caused by
the water pipes sweating in the summer. The ceiling was a different
material, much more porous. I put insullation around them and the
stain stopped growing.
|
12.183 | Sound like moisture from somewhere. Ice dam, meybe | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Tue Mar 03 1987 15:37 | 2 |
| Presumably, the 1st floor bath is on an outside wall?
Have you excluded ice dams?
|
12.125 | scrapping | HYDRA::BOLDUC | | Tue Jul 07 1987 10:27 | 18 |
| re 446.8
I tried your suggestion last night. I sprayed the ceiling with
a water bottle and waited about a minute, then stated scrapping
with a 3 to 4 inch putty knife. It worked great. It got the ceiling
down to a nice smooth surface and maybe won't even need a final
light sanding.
My original intent was to use a sander from start to finish. I
just got through doing this on my living room walls where I had
patched with plaster. What a mess.
Thanks for the suggestion and would recommend it to anyone before
attempting to sand.
Denise
|
12.197 | Help! Repaint Ceiling | COGVAX::LABAK | | Mon Aug 03 1987 12:38 | 18 |
| The house I recently purchased has the cellar ceiling done over
in 6" by 6" ceiling tiles. They appear to be compressed "cardboard"
material. Anyway, I would like to repaint this ceiling. Does anyone
have any experence redoing this type of ceiling. It appears that
paint may just absorb into these tiles.
Questions:
- Do I need a primer? Laytex or enamel?
- Better to roll it or spray it ?
- Do I need some type of sealer?
Any help on this is appreciated.
Rick LaBak
I believe these tiles are about 35 years old.
|
12.198 | | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Mon Aug 03 1987 12:49 | 12 |
| I have these things in my basement too. I'm considering tearing them
out to do some rewiring and replacing them with something removable.
As for painting them, after 35 years I'd be worried about getting
a clean enough surface for the paint to adhere to. Maybe vacuuming
and wiping with a damp sponge? I have seen them painted. Sprayers
indoors may be a bit messy. Never used one, so that's just a guess.
You could paint the seams with a brush and then roll the main areas.
Maybe a primer such as BIN would be the best thing to use to seal
and hide any stains.
Phil
|
12.199 | | YODA::SALEM | | Mon Aug 03 1987 13:06 | 7 |
|
Take precaution when you're painting old ceilings. Painters used
to use Calcemine (white wash) to paint ceilings and if you put an
oil based paint over it, the paint will fall off in globs after
a few hours. Be safe and use a latex based paint.
-Ted Salem
|
12.200 | | 3D::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Mon Aug 03 1987 14:15 | 7 |
|
My father has that type of ceiling in his cellar and he paints
it about every 5 years with white latex paint. It looks great !
-Steve-
|
12.201 | Not quite right | TALLIS::SAMARAS | Advanced Vax Engineering LTN | Mon Aug 03 1987 14:42 | 9 |
| RE: .2
You've got it backwards. Calcimine strips off with water. Latex paint
over calcimine is a no-no.. Oil over calcimine is OK.
See note 1052.
...bill
|
12.202 | ALWAYS wash calcimine off before repainting | DRUID::CHACE | | Tue Aug 04 1987 13:36 | 9 |
| re: .4 DON'T use ANY paint over calcimine. If you use latex over
calcimine, it will peel off right after you put it on. If you use
oil paint over calcimine, it can peel off any time it gets water
on it, such as when you try to wash it or if you strip wallpaper
nearby.
Calcimine is not hard to wash off at all. A little messy maybe
but not hard.
Kenny
|
12.203 | | YODA::SALEM | | Wed Aug 05 1987 13:18 | 7 |
|
RE: .4
Oops.. You're right. Glad I didn't paint any old ceilings!
-Ted
|
12.208 | Ceiling replacement | CRETE::FLANNERY | | Mon Aug 17 1987 17:39 | 11 |
| I need to have some ceilings taken down and replaced and
we've decided to have somebody come in and do it as long
as the cost doesn't break us. Does anybody have any
recommendations? And how about cost? It's all horsehair
and after gutting three rooms of the stuff I never want
to touch it again. The house is in Sterling, MA (Worcester,
Fitchburg, Leomister area).
thanks.
-k
|
12.209 | 2 Sources | GNERIC::FARRELL | Rubber Rodeo Fan Club | Tue Aug 18 1987 10:36 | 16 |
| You might want to try the following companies in Worcester for
Plastering/Wallboarding
B&B Plastering C&S Plastering
112 Paine St.
Worcester,Mass.
Sorry I don't have the phone numbers, they should be in the Worcester
phone book. They are both pretty good, we went with C&S to have a
few ceilings done. Price varies from $300 - $600 for a 12x12 room
depending on how much work is done by yourself.
Joef
|
12.210 | | RGB::MCGRATH | | Tue Aug 18 1987 17:01 | 7 |
| Yeah, I have a suggestion. Don't take down the old ceiling.
Put up the new ceiling over the old.
1.) Never do irreversible things in an old house. Putting up a new
ceiling is reversible.
2.) It's simpler, cheaper, looks the same.
|
12.211 | Horsehair plaster ain't that bad.. | KELVIN::RPALMER | Half a bubble off plumb | Wed Aug 19 1987 09:29 | 18 |
|
If you hire someone to put up a new ceiling they most likely
will put the sheetrock up over the existing ceiling. They will
first punch holes to locate the stringers, then just screw it up.
One option would be to do that yourself. It won't be very messy
just good hard work. You could hang the 'rock yourself and hire
a plasterer if you want a great looking ceiling. Keep in mind that
you don't have to be as careful hanging the 'rock if you get it
plastered. It is the tape route that requires care.
A personal opinion....Don't put up a cardboard hanging ceiling!!
I think they look horrible!! Yes it is cheap and easy, but it looks
that way. I think I'd rip it all out and start from scratch, but
then again I'm a little strange.
=Ralph=
(one room ripped out and redone, five to go)
|
12.212 | Horsehair _is_ that bad | CRETE::FLANNERY | | Wed Aug 19 1987 13:36 | 24 |
| Nope, I want the old ones down, for a couple reasons. One
is that my ceilings are already low enough as it is and most
all the trim around the doors and windows go right to the
ceiling. There are rooms where this has been done in the past
and half my window trim is covered. Another reason other is
that there is so much cover up already done in the house (that
has taken us hours to undo) that we have this real problem about
adding to it. Another thing is that the old ceiling tends to
crumble on top of the new ceiling and, at least in one room where
this has been done, the new ceiling isn't bearing the weight well
on the seams. We also plan to put in new wiring when the ceilings
are down.
So...I want someone else to come in and deal with the mess (20
feet up over a staircase in one place) and take the stuff down
and put either drywall or blueboard up. I realize that we could
do it ourselves but, unfortunately, we've about hit the burnout
stage on working with this stuff. We're in the middle of about
a dozen "projects" (we've been working in panic mode fixing things
that couldn't wait) and since we've decided to get some help
finishing some stuff off, the least favorite goes to the hired
help.
It's an idea that we thought of and decided against. Thanks anyway.
|
12.213 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Wed Aug 19 1987 17:24 | 7 |
| Re: .2
I don't see how putting a new ceiling over an old one can be "reversible",
unless you have some magic way to hold up the new one that doesn't
involve drilling/nailing/screwing/gluing through/into/on the old
one.
Besides, what's the point? I can see preserving fine old woodwork,
but plaster is plaster is plaster.
|
12.233 | Ceiling spot | LABC::FRIEDMAN | | Fri Oct 23 1987 11:49 | 3 |
| After a big rain I noticed an approximately 1" x 1" discoloration
on one place on the ceiling. What could this mean?
|
12.234 | More info, please | VIDEO::DCL | David Larrick | Fri Oct 23 1987 12:06 | 5 |
| "Discoloration", eh? Is it wet at all?
What's above the spot - the second floor? attic? flat roof?
Has somebody been squashing spiders on your ceiling? :-)
|
12.235 | | LABC::FRIEDMAN | | Fri Oct 23 1987 12:22 | 4 |
| There is no visible water on the ceiling, but the spot is cooler
than the surrounding area so I believe it is moist. Above the
ceiling is the attic.
|
12.236 | | RGB::MCGRATH | | Fri Oct 23 1987 14:02 | 11 |
| At the risk of stating the obvious....
Maybe you have a leak and water came in during the rain.
The best way to tell is to go into the attic and look
on the floor in the area of the spot. Usually nail/screw holes are
the first place for water to come through. Then look up for
any obvious potential sources of leaks. Common ones are chimney
flashing, vents, etc. assuming the shingles are in reasonable shape.
|
12.237 | | LABC::FRIEDMAN | | Fri Oct 23 1987 15:05 | 9 |
| This is a house I recently bought. The roof is one year old, so
I doubt the problem is with the shingles. I hate going up in the
attic; it has the "loose fill" type of insulation. I guess I'll
wear a dust mask. Because of the insulation I don't think I'll
be able to see the attic floor. Maybe the insulation is damp
from a roof leak and is retaining the water and so just a little
bit oozed onto the ceiling beneath.
|
12.238 | | MORMPS::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Fri Oct 23 1987 15:29 | 18 |
| > This is a house I recently bought. The roof is one year old, so
> I doubt the problem is with the shingles. I hate going up in the
> attic; it has the "loose fill" type of insulation. I guess I'll
> wear a dust mask. Because of the insulation I don't think I'll
> be able to see the attic floor. Maybe the insulation is damp
> from a roof leak and is retaining the water and so just a little
> bit oozed onto the ceiling beneath.
correct - except enough oozed onto the ceiling beneath to soak through
the ceiling -
I know its no fun - but it would be a good idea to go into the attic
and find/fix the leak. If it continues, it will eventually rot a hole
right through your ceiling board.
After you fix it, make sure you spray some sealer over the stain
before repainting.
|
12.239 | Same problem, fixed. | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | Is it spring yet? | Fri Oct 23 1987 16:48 | 11 |
| I had the same problem. I have the gray blown in insulation in
the attic. It makes it real easy to find leaks. Look directly
above the black spot of insulation. This was a brand new house,
of course. Builders don't care much when they can't build houses
fast enough. I expect with the current market some of them will
get caught holding the bag. I can think of one to whom I'd like
to see it happen. {:-)
I had to climb up on the roof and squeeze silicone caulking in around
the roof vent. Damn near killed myself on that steep roof. Thank
god for toilet vent pipes.
|
12.240 | cellulose I'd guess | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum;mail->Boehm::Rosenbaum | Sat Oct 24 1987 00:13 | 7 |
| Presumably the insulation is cellulose - not terribly toxic or dusty.
Make sure you walk (crawl) (staying) on the joists.
If it is cellulose (grey chewed up paper appearance) it is not
irritating like fiberglas.
Rich
|
12.241 | smooth ceiling VS rough ceiling | RICKS::MALIK | | Tue Dec 15 1987 17:56 | 5 |
|
Could anyone tell me advantage of have smooth ceiling verse rough
ceiling and which one is more expensive?
Thanks.
|
12.242 | | 3D::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Tue Dec 15 1987 18:33 | 7 |
|
I think the biggest drawback to a rough ceiling is when you
have to repair something. It's almost impossible to hide the repair
marks as you can't feather the new edges into the old.
-Steve-
|
12.273 | Paint textured ceiling or walls first? | STUBBI::DA_WEIER | | Tue Dec 15 1987 22:17 | 9 |
| I have recently sheetrocked two small bedrooms, and I am now ready
to paint the ceiling and the walls. I want to put a textured ceiling
in both rooms.
My questions are, Do I paint the textured ceiling or the walls
first? and how do you paint the edges of the ceiling to have it
come out even and not get all over the walls?
Any advice would be appreciated.
|
12.243 | Patching and cleaning | GLIVET::RECKARD | Jon Reckard 264-7710 | Wed Dec 16 1987 07:52 | 8 |
| It depends on HOW textured. If it's the pretty, swirled stuff, .1's right,
it's nearly impossible to patch. If it's a really rough, stalagtite-type of
finish, I think a repair would be easier than on a smooth ceiling - no
feathering is required, just dab on the plaster/compound. Even a rolled,
sand-texture finish shouldn't be all that hard to patch.
I guess I'd prefer smooth only because there's at least a potential for
cleaning a spot or stain without resorting to repainting/refinishing.
|
12.245 | Rough gets my vote | DSTR08::SMICK | Van C. Smick | Wed Dec 16 1987 09:00 | 13 |
| One other consideration:
A smooth ceiling will show any tiny cracks caused by the house settling
much more than the rough.
One observation: It is not hard to patch the swirled, rough plaster,
it just takes skill (if you do it) or money if you
hire someone to do it. [I paid once and learned enough
to do it myself afterwards!]
I'd go with the rough again, if I had a choice on the next house.
VCS
|
12.274 | Spray as an alternative | VAXWRK::WOODBURY | | Wed Dec 16 1987 09:17 | 7 |
| I have never had much luck with painting textured ceilings, they
never look that even. A friend of mine rented a compressor and
spay gun designed to spray ceilings and they came out great. Most
rental places have the equipment, he got his in the Lowell area.
The small amount of spray he got on the walls brushed off when it
was dry, so I would do the ceilings first.
|
12.275 | Ceiling first | SALEM::R_RAYMOND | | Wed Dec 16 1987 09:23 | 6 |
| Paint the ceiling first. What are you going to use to get a textured
ceiling...sand paint?? If you use this you will be applying it
with a roller....a long nap one. Do the edges first with a smaller
roller, then do the rest of the ceiling.
Ric
|
12.246 | I'm a smoothie | VIDEO::DCL | David Larrick | Wed Dec 16 1987 09:31 | 8 |
| And yet two more:
1. It's been mentioned many times in this conference that the rough texture
can be very bad news in damp places such as bathrooms. Once mildew gets
started in all those nooks and crannies, it's nearly impossible to kill it.
2. If you have any interest in an authentic look for an older house, smooth
is the _only_ way to go.
|
12.276 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Dec 16 1987 09:50 | 9 |
| Spray paint indoors?!? Not me! I tried it once...paint was
everywhere!
Re: painting walls or ceiling first, do the ceiling first, then
the walls, and ever-so-slightly get the wall paint onto the
ceiling, just enough that you get the wall 100% painted. Because
of the way the sight lines are, you'll never notice the wall
paint on the ceiling (you'd have to lie down on the floor a foot
from the wall and look up), but you'll notice any little waver
of paint from the ceiling onto the wall.
|
12.277 | Further suggestions. | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | It's better in the Bahamas. | Wed Dec 16 1987 09:59 | 13 |
| A couple of ideas:
1) My mother (when I was too young to do ceiling work :-) did
a textured ceiling by getting a thick paint and applying
it with a sponge. Just dip one side of the sponge in the
paint and press it against the ceiling. It still looks
pretty good.
2) If you like the "neat swirlies" on your ceiling, I think they
do it by rolling on the sand paint and then swirling it
with a wisk broom. I expect it takes a little practice.
Stan
|
12.247 | Smooth is more expensive for me... | SPIDER::PEARCE | All things bright and beautiful | Wed Dec 16 1987 10:02 | 7 |
| I had an estimate done last week for my bathroom. I asked for
a smooth ceiling and he told me it would be $125.00 more to
do it that way. The reason: it's more work to put in a smooth
ceiling. At that price, I'll stick with the rough.
- Linda
|
12.278 | Spraying inside | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Wed Dec 16 1987 10:32 | 9 |
| > Spray paint indoors?!? Not me! I tried it once...paint was
> everywhere!
I sprayed stain indoors once. Everything in my house is tinted
brown now. I wore a mask but was still out sick for 2 days following that.
I even called the Poison Control Center in Boston since I thought
I was about to die. They looked up "Minwax" on their computer and
it wasn't listed so they told me it must have been from something
else.
|
12.279 | Brand name .vs. generic name | PSTJTT::TABER | Alimentary, my dear Watson | Wed Dec 16 1987 10:55 | 7 |
| > They looked up "Minwax" on their computer and
> it wasn't listed so they told me it must have been from something
> else.
Maybe you should have told them what color it was.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
12.248 | depends on your house | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Wed Dec 16 1987 11:34 | 15 |
|
The ceilings of my 1890's house were redone with the stalagtites,
and it makes me nauseous! If you have an older home, I say go
with what is authentic. The neighbors next door to me had all
their ceilings redone professionally (blueboard with skim coat
plaster), and it looks wonderful (they were happy to give me a
tour). They have a 200 year old colonial with Victorian additions.
Sounds strange, but it was one of those teeny houses that grew,
like so many on the block.
I've seem modern homes with the swirls (not stalagtites), and
they look quite nice.
-tm
|
12.249 | Stalactites? Ick!! | STRATA::RUDMAN | Tho I'm an * objection... | Wed Dec 16 1987 12:16 | 23 |
|
re: My new dormer: My downstairs is the swirl-pattern (popular
for 30-40 yr. old houses) which has a small patch in the dining
room (corner, T.G.) which, to me sticks out like s sore thumb.
So I'm sure it's a bitch to patch. The old upstairs was a DIY
smooth ceiling (prev. owner) which showed all defects. The new
is rough. I thought it was too rough, with the aforementioned nooks
& crannies, but when I painted it the surface tended to smooth out.
I paid particular attention to filling those Ns & Cs not so much
for creepy critters but the shadows were eye-catching. Now I don't
even notice the ceiling, and I believe the texture helps diffuse
the light--no dark corners in any of the upstairs rooms.
Oh, yes: I agree about the bathroom ceilings, but if you slop the
ol' ceiling paint on it and use your bathroom vent fan during
bathing I would think the M & Ms would have tough going finding
a foot-hold. Tylex, by the way, is hell on mould & mildew. The
downstairs bathroom fan was busted (since replaced) and the summer
heat caused significant growth. I found if I used straight Tylex
on a damp sponge (no rinse) the black turned white and the residual
Tylex prevented new growth. (Read the label carefully.)
Don
|
12.280 | | STRATA::RUDMAN | Tho I'm an * objection... | Wed Dec 16 1987 12:22 | 8 |
| I just painted my new ceiling. Used a brush around the edges (walls,
doors, etc.) and a dripless roller (which, when I got the hang of
it, worked!). Except for the spot I missed in the hall, it came
out great! Be sure to use good ceiling paint. The ceiling has
a rough surface, which is more forgiving, but I also successfully
did the walls of the closets.
Don
|
12.250 | Smooth is nicer | JENEVR::GRISE | Tony Grise | Wed Dec 16 1987 12:35 | 16 |
|
Smooth ceilings are $0.05 to $0.10 per square foot more
expensive than textured celings. I personnally perfer the
smooth ceilings, it makes the room look bigger. A smooth
finish can look extremly attractive if done properly.
You can also have then done in a sand paint, which is
somewhere in between smooth and textured. Not nearly
as many, or as pronounced nooks & crannies, and hides
any imperfections nicely.
Tony Grise
|
12.281 | Pad edgers are the way to go... | TOOK::ARN | | Wed Dec 16 1987 12:47 | 8 |
| Used a brush around the edges !!! This is the 20th century !! The
best investment you could ever make is to get one of those SureLine
pad edgers with the wheels on it. They cost around $2.50 and you
can edge around a room in about 5 minutes. I wouldn't paint without
one.
Tim
|
12.251 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Dec 16 1987 12:51 | 4 |
| Mostly a matter of taste. Personally, I favor smooth ceilings.
All too often, textured ceilings seem to be a cover-up for
shoddy and/or incompetent workmanship, foisted off on homeowners
as more "stylish". I'm not impressed.
|
12.252 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | Not one of the Beasty Boys | Wed Dec 16 1987 13:46 | 5 |
|
One thing not pointed out yet is that a smoothe ceiling is a lot
easier to clean.
Mike
|
12.253 | Boooring | FRSBEE::DEROSA | | Wed Dec 16 1987 14:54 | 3 |
|
Smooth ceilings are BORING! Especially in large rooms with cathederal
ceilings, skylights etc.
|
12.254 | reflection on the ceiling | CIMNET::LUNGER | Dave Lunger, 291-7797, MET-1/K2 | Wed Dec 16 1987 15:39 | 10 |
| Smooth ceiling rooms are brighter... the ceiling is more reflective.
Rough ceilings, because of the texture, are darker.
I believe that neither one is better (except in damp areas), but each
gives its own disctinctive mood. In my cathedral ceiling family room,
I have lighting that reflects off the ceiling, so I choose to pay extra
for the smooth ceiling to better reflect light... (the room relies on
reflected light rather than direct lighting). The full baths also have
smooth, but the 1/2 bath and all other rooms have one form or another
of rough texture.
|
12.255 | sand mix plaster | TOLKIN::RIDGE | | Thu Dec 17 1987 11:57 | 7 |
|
I dont like most textured finishes that are made for the DIY'er.
If I'm doing it my self it gets the 'seemed and taped' smooth finish.
If I call in a plasterer, I like the sand mix plaster done
in random swirls.
|
12.256 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 17 1987 12:06 | 12 |
| As usual, I fear we may not be making fair comparisons. First of all one needs
to consider what the ceiling is made of. If it's sheetrock and jointing
compound, you're much better off with a textured look since it's almost
impossible to get a perfectly smooth finish. By using the texture, all the
nail heads and seams magically disappear.
As for a smooth ceiling, I think you almost have to go with skim coat to ensure
the smooth look.
Beyond that, it's totally personal.
-mark
|
12.257 | No end joints | AKOV68::CRAMER | | Thu Dec 17 1987 13:01 | 14 |
| I am rather surprised to hear all this talk about how impossible
it is to get a smooth finish on a drywall ceiling. I have put up
several ceilings of this type and have never had a job turn out
unacceptable. Maybe I don't have the same standards as you folks
for smooth ceilings. I will grant that if you shine a strong light
at a small angle and look real close you could find the seams, but,
in normal light, with the shadows that that implies, they are totally
un-noticeable. Personally I think textured ceilings look terrible
and cheap (what are they trying to hide). It doesn't fit in with
my design philosophy that a ceiling should be an architectural
focal point in the type of houses we live in which is what I feel
a textured ceiling is trying to become.
Alan
|
12.258 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Thu Dec 17 1987 13:09 | 36 |
|
Alan beat me to it but I'll post this anyway...
Um. Mark, speaking of unfair comparisons, I think you are comparing a
do-it-yourself sheetrock job with a professionally-done skimcoat job.
Sheetrock has been around for quite awhile and I really don't think it
is impossible -- or even that difficult -- to get a nice smooth
sheetrock ceiling, especially if it is done by a professional. It does
require quite a bit of practice to do a nice job of taping and sanding.
And it is a real pain to work over your head as you have to do with a
ceiling (the pros do it on stilts and, yes, they do fall off them every
once in awhile). For these reasons, I don't consider ceiling sheetrock a
reasonable do-it-yourself job. (And of course nail heads aren't a
problem because we are now in the 1980s and drywall screws have been
invented.)
From what I have heard and seen, skimcoat does a beautiful job. However,
it is more expensive, many contractors are just now learning how to
do it, so it's hard to find a contractor, and it generates a lot more
crud to clean up (this one could be caused by the general lack of expertise).
I imagine that becoming proficient at skimcoat is at least as hard as
becoming proficient at sheetrocking (probably more so, since skimcoat
requires plastering skills, and plastering went away because it was
easier/cheaper to do sheetrock). So, if you want a smooth ceiling, you'll
want a professional to do it anyway...
I suspect that the textured look was invented and pushed by contractors
because it takes less time and less skill to do it -- therefore it is
cheaper. However, if you like the look and you can live with the
drawbacks (mostly the difficulty of cleaning and painting it), that's
terrific. It means that you can do the job yourself (and do it just
as well as the pros) and save big bucks in the process.
JP
|
12.259 | Time consuming by simple | AKOV68::CRAMER | | Thu Dec 17 1987 15:34 | 41 |
| .16 should read " ...SHOULDN'T be an architectural focal point."
Actually, while I was a professional carpenter, I would never have
passed myself off as a professional drywall mechanic. I hate taping,
but, if you take your time and do it right it really isn't that
tough. Granted working over your head is a bitch, but, I never have
figured out how to do a ceiling any other way (turn the house over?)
The most important points in doing a good drywall job on a ceiling
are:
1) Use sheetrock that goes all the way across the room. You
cannot, no matter who you are, get a good joint end to end.
2) Use at least 3 ( 4 is better ) coats of compound, each one
wider than the one before. The final width of a joint should
be at least 10 inches.
If you have a joint that is more than 1/4" wide, put in a
filler coat of compound and let it dry BEFORE you put your
tape on. Else, the compound will shrink out from under the
tape and leave a bubble.
3) Use a damp, firm sponge to smooth the compound.
Sand as a last resort, and have a vaccuum handy.
4) Dimple the nail heads or screws, final compound should be
a good 4 to 6 inches around.
5) A good coat of a high quality primer followed by two coats
of good ceiling paint, and your done.
You'll notice that by the time you get all that compound around
the nails and joints, you damn near have a skim coat.
Some pros I've seen actually grind their large knives slightly
concave to eliminate the sanding of the final coat, instant
feathering. These folks also get LOTS of practice.
Alan
PS If you like this sort of work, I can offer some free enjoyment
;^)
|
12.282 | Thanks for the help | STUBBI::DA_WEIER | | Thu Dec 17 1987 18:48 | 4 |
|
Thanks for all the responses, I know now that I will do the ceiling
first, and I will further investigate the different methods of applying
the textured paint.
|
12.260 | Use Empty Buckets for Stilts | CHARON::FERREIRA | | Fri Dec 18 1987 13:19 | 9 |
|
For installing and taping sheetrock on ceilings take two empty joint
compound buckets turn them upside down and make a few holes in the
bottom and tie them to your feet. It's a lot easier than using stilts!
Jim
|
12.261 | Low ceilings or just taller?? | SALEM::R_RAYMOND | | Fri Dec 18 1987 14:18 | 4 |
| re. .19...using buckets for stilts...
Your "old house" must have lower ceilings than my "old house"
or....just maybe you are a *lot* taller than I am. -) -) -)
Ric
|
12.262 | Ok for 8 foot ceilings | CHARON::FERREIRA | | Mon Dec 21 1987 13:01 | 7 |
|
I'm 5'10" and it works good on 8 foot celings. If you have say 10
foot ceilings maybe you could stack up buckets.....
Jim .-)
|
12.263 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Dec 22 1987 08:05 | 13 |
| back to the original subject...
I pointed out that it's damn near impossible to hide taping marks on a smooth
ceiling and I'll stand by that statement. However, some tapers are obviously
better than others and I'm sure the experts can indeed do it. Another factor is
if the ceiling is large or small, flat or cathedral. A cathedral ceiling shows
every little imperfection as the light reflects off it.
btw - take a look around at virtually any wall in DEC and I bet you'll see tape
marks. You may have to look at them sideways or only when the sunlight
is reflecting just so, but they're there - and that's my point.
-mark
|
12.264 | And some folks like abstract art, too! ;^) | AKOV76::CRAMER | | Tue Dec 22 1987 10:09 | 10 |
| As was mentioned earlier, too, some people are pickier then others.
For me, I would rather have a smooth ceiling that "if the sun was
just so, and you looked real close at the right angle, you could
see the tape joints", then a ceiling that looked like my 6 year
old ran amok with the joint compound, from any angle, in any light
at any time.
Different stokes for different folks.
Alan
|
12.265 | another vote for smooth | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Dec 23 1987 08:03 | 7 |
| re:-1
if you're coming away thinking I'm in favor of rough ceiling because it's too
damn hard to get a good smooth one, you're wrong. I too prefer smooth to rough.
I was just trying to point out that it doesn't come easy.
-mark
|
12.283 | I love my sprayer for ceilings | AKOV11::KALINOWSKI | | Wed Dec 30 1987 17:41 | 33 |
| I have textured ceilings in all my rooms. The first time I painted
the house, I used a good grade roller with two coats. Still didn't
look right. This time around, I tried a Wagner power painter. What
a difference. I did two coats again and it came out perfect! not
a line to be seen. I always tape up a room before I start anyways
with templates the size of the windows and doors that are reuseable.
I then put down heavy plastic drop cloths for the hardwood floors.
I thin the ceiling paint according to the sprayer's specs. As for
me, I wear all the grubbiest clothes I can find. I put plastic bags
over my shoes and hold them up with rubber bands. I then put a
a painter's hat on and a pair of old glasses in addition to a
mask from the hardware store.
My technique is to do 4 foot paths accross the room in a circluar
motion, and overlay each about 6 inches. When dry (about 30 mins),
do the same except at a 90 degree angle to the first time.
Then I clean out the sprayer, pull the plastic drop cloths and
clean the floor with a sponge and warm water where any sprayover
has occurred. The results are a perfectly blended ceiling. I do
not use the sprayer on the walls as it never works as well as
a good roller.
I can remember taking 2 1/2 days to put two coats of ceiling paint
on a catherial ceiling in a split level using planks and an 8 ft
extention handle. What a hassle and pain in my back. I get my money
out of that spray just on ceilings.
john
I use latex ceiling paint from Spags of course!
Yes it takes time, but the results are worth it the next morning
when the sun comes streaming in on those fresh white ceilings!
|
12.266 | Can the textured glop be chipped off? | TALLIS::DEROSA | I := not(number) | Fri Jan 22 1988 13:01 | 12 |
| We have swirled textured ceilings all over our first floor,
and we would like to replace them this year with smooth ceilings.
I am hoping that there is some way to chip the old ceiling stuff
off the wallboard behind it. Is there?
Or do we (shudder) have to take down all the old ceiling wallboard
(with the textured glop) and put up fresh wallboarding, essentially
putting up new ceilings from scratch?
jdr
|
12.267 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Jan 22 1988 16:00 | 8 |
| re: .25
I seriously doubt if you can get the old stuff off without ruining
the board under it.
You MIGHT be able to get a plasterer to put a coat of plaster over
the whole thing, but he probably wouldn't like the idea much. Worth
checking into, though.
I suspect the only way to do a decent job of it is tear it down.
|
12.268 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Jan 22 1988 16:03 | 9 |
| Another option might be to put up blueboard over the old ceiling,
and have a plasterer put a skim coat over that (or do drywall,
if you prefer). However, if you're going to all that trouble you
may as well go the extra mile and tear the old one down; if you
do the work of tearing it down the job won't cost any more, except
possible rental for a dumpster to get rid of it.
And tearing down a ceiling IS a pretty horrendous mess, but so is
putting up a new ceiling.
|
12.269 | Home made nuclear bombs | 3D::BOOTH | Stephen Booth | Mon Jan 25 1988 07:39 | 16 |
|
I just finished sheet rocking my dinning room walls and ceiling
over. The ceiling had 2 3/8" sheets on it with a skim coat over
the last one. If a pipe didn't break in my upstairs bathroom the
ceiling wood still be there. It was pretty easy to give the ceiling
a few taps with the hammer so I could get a good grip on it. Then
I started pulling easy and here it came, no wait I'll just let this
piece go down real easy. The sheet rock heard this and said "Get
out of the way dummy I weigh about a million pounds". Each piece
that came down came crashing down and looked like a nuclear bomb
kicking up dust ! The whole job of taking it down took about 1/2
hour for a 10x10 room but the cleanup took about 5 hours.
-Steve-
|
12.270 | can you skim coat over skim coat? | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Jan 25 1988 20:09 | 7 |
| I currently have ceiling with swirls in them and when I break out the wall
between the house and the addition, I want to blend the ceilings together.
The existing ceiling is a skin coat and the key here is it's never been
painted so it's really porous. I'm hoping I can simply have someone skin
coat on top of the skim coat. Has anyone ever done this?
-mark
|
12.271 | | TOLKIN::RIDGE | | Tue Jan 26 1988 13:22 | 11 |
|
It can be done. A professional plasterer should be able to
handle this easily. I am in the same situation as you are.
I have just put on a new family room and will have it skim
coated. My neighbor had the same thing done and you cannot
tell that it wasn't all done at the same time.
However, the palster who did the original work is local, and
I will try to get him.
|
12.272 | Caution: Asbestos hazard | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Wed Jan 27 1988 10:32 | 15 |
| A note of caution when tearing down those old pimply ceilings.
Back in the 60's and 70's they were using asbestos in the
'popcorn' ceilings. I have no idea how you tell if you have
a hazard over your head, but if the ceiling dates to that period
you may do better to just cover it over with another ceiling.
I've done it both ways. I ripped down one ceiling and replaced
it and put a ceiling up under a ceiling and found it far simpler
to just leave the old ceiling in place. Heck, it deadens sound
and saves a clean up and disposal problem. I located the orignal
strapping with a stud finder and hung new strapping and new ceiling.
Came out looking great. Mine is an old house so I could level the
ceiling by shimming while I was at it and wiring for new ceiling
fan was a cinch.
-Bob
|
12.293 | A Bizarre Ceiling Design | HYDRA::JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Fri Feb 05 1988 08:54 | 23 |
| The guy I bought my house from was in the process of finishing off
the basement. His plan for the ceiling was to have 4" x 6" beams
spaced a little over 5' apart, with 2" x 4" beams hung between the
big ones and spaced about 28" apart. The big beams are notched
so that the little ones fit in, leaving the top surface flat. He
told me that he had planned to put sheets of 5' x 10' sheetrock
on top of the beams, with the beams covering all the seams.
Well, I've finished putting up all the beams, but I can't find
any 5' x 10' sheetrock. I can't even find somebody who's HEARD of
5' wide sheetrock. I could use 4' wide sheetrock, but if I want
all the seams on top of beams (I do), I can only get one 5' x 27"
square per piece of sheetrock. Very wasteful.
A co-worker suggested getting some large sheets of the light-weight
ceiling tiles. That's a good idea, but where can I get it?
Does anybody have any suggestions of other materials, or know
of a place to get 5' wide sheetrock or ceiling tiles? I'd like
the ceiling tiles to have a flat surface, or something resembling
a plastered surface. I don't like the acoustical tile look.
Thanx in advance.
Steve
|
12.294 | whoops | HYDRA::JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Fri Feb 05 1988 08:59 | 5 |
| Uh...I forgot to mention that I live in southern New Hampshire.
Couldn't you tell from my personal name? :-)
However, I am willing to drive pretty far to get the right stuff.
Steve
|
12.295 | Make your own? | CHART::CBUSKY | | Fri Feb 05 1988 09:33 | 10 |
| As far as I know, 4' is the standard width for building material sheet
goods, plywood, sheetrock, paneling. You can get sheetrock in 12' and I
think 16' lengths, but its still 4' wide.
About all you could do is make up your own 5 foot wide panels by
screwing a 4' and a 1' piece to a couple of pieces of plywood,
finishing the seams while the panel is on the ground and easy to work
on.
Charly
|
12.296 | better make a new plan | QUOKKA::SNYDER | Wherever you go, there you are | Fri Feb 05 1988 10:37 | 15 |
|
re: .0
I think you'll be SOL trying to find 5' x 10' sheetrock. I have
worked with 5' x 10' sheets of 5/8" particle board (had the
pleasure of carrying 30 of those suckers up to the second floor
of a barn) but that was in Rock Creek, British Columbia.
Out of curiosity, I called a sheetrock supply place for
contractors here in the Springs and was told, in no uncertain
terms, that I can get 4' x n' for various values of n, but without
a million bucks for retooling, I'll never see 5' x anything
sheetrock.
Sid
|
12.297 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Auhhhhh, I've been slimed! | Fri Feb 05 1988 12:25 | 6 |
|
I've thought of doing something similar in my basement (with 4'
x 8' sheets though) with plywood. Wouldn't sheetrock tend to sag
over this unsupported (in the middle) distance?
Phil
|
12.298 | How about that sag? | HYDRA::JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Fri Feb 05 1988 12:50 | 10 |
| re .4>
The unsupported 'squares' are about 26" x 5'. Do you think that
would sag significantly?
reiterate .0>
Anybody ever hear of large sheets of lightweight ceiling tiles?
Steve
|
12.299 | BIG GAPS | JENEVR::GRISE | Tony Grise | Fri Feb 05 1988 14:19 | 9 |
|
26" x 5' squares are significant gaps. Most sheet rock
applications are supported every 16" with strapping and screwed
every eight inches. I would look for alternatives like tounge
and groove pine, or other wood material.
|
12.300 | Office construction materials, maybe? | CLOSUS::HOE | from Colorado with love! | Fri Feb 05 1988 15:49 | 5 |
| I have seen 3'X10' prefinished sheet rock used in office construction
(had a wall paper material finish on it) but havent seen anything
like it for a home.
/cal
|
12.301 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Fri Feb 05 1988 22:45 | 2 |
| Do I detect a planning lesson buried somewhere in here?
|
12.67 | A testimonial to epoxy. | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Mon Feb 08 1988 09:44 | 38 |
| ================================================================================
Note 1893.13 Epoxy paint for wet bathroom ceiliings? 13 of 13
CSSE32::NICHOLS "HERB" 33 lines 8-FEB-1988 09:37
-< I declare the experiment a success! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I did the bathroom ceiling yesterday!
As far as I am concerned it is a success! It took about 45 minutes
to paint. Hardened in a few hours.
A point that needs reemphasis. Painting with 2 part epoxy SHOULD
NOT BE DONE unless there is plenty of fresh air. That probably
means it should never be done in the winter unless the outside
temperature is above 50 degress Fahrenheit. This is because the
fumes are extremely unpleasant and require an open window in the
work space. I should have waited for warmer weather! As it was,
it became necessary to open the bathroom window, but the window
could not be kept open for long because it was so cold outside -in
Massachusetts. There are instructions on the can about minimum
temperature. Don't remember what that temp is, but it was only about
20 deg F yesterday.
In summary, the epoxied surface is very hard, should withstand all
water attacks, cost l.t. $20 to do a 6x8 ceiling, and is quite shiny.
The epoxy I used came from Sears. It is an off-white color which
is darker than an oil-based white paint. I would have liked it to
be whiter. I will be putting another coat on when warmer
weather comes; because of the fumes, I did not do as thorough a
job as I should have. The 2 pint cans are enough to do the ~48 sq
ft twice. The shiny, off white may not be for everyone, although
the shine is not much more brilliant that oil based paint would
be. My conclusion so far is that this is another inexpensive
permanent solution to peeling paint in a bathroom. I would do it
again
herb
|
12.302 | Go For It | HYDRA::JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Mon Feb 08 1988 16:03 | 19 |
| Thanx for the replies. I think that I'm gonna go with 4' x 10'
sheetrock, which will give me two usable pieces per sheet. I was
in the building supply store this weekend picking up pieces of
sheetrock by the edge and checking out the sag. I didn't look like
it would sag too much. Since I'm not planning on plastering (just
white paint), I'm not worried about a small amount of sag cracking
the plaster. Anyway, I'm going for the 'rustic' look here, so maybe
a little sag will look good! :-). A backup strategy could be to
attach stiffeners on the back (top).
Anyway, I'll post a reply later to let you know what happens.
As for the lesson in planning, most of the major beams were up (and
notched) when I bought the place. This was more of a lesson in
gullibility.
Happy renovations;
Steve
|
12.303 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Tue Feb 09 1988 08:31 | 3 |
| My in-laws had a living room ceiling done in the same fashion. Beams
were centered on 2'x4' intervals. No noticable sag in the �" wall
board layed above the beams, after at least 15 years.
|
12.305 | Can I remove dropped ceiling in dormer? | SALEM::PAGLIARULO | | Sun Feb 14 1988 21:33 | 15 |
| I'm redoing the upstairs bathroom and have a ceiling question.
The bathroom is built from a dormer added on to a cape. The roof
of the dormer slopes slightly and inside, the bathroom ceiling was
framed with 2X4's so that the ceiling is level and doesn't follow
the slope of the roof. I'd like to eliminate the level ceiling
by removing the 2X4 framing and screwing my sheetrock directly
to the 2X6 dormer rafters. Is there a structural reason that I
shouldn't do this? I believe the only purpose of the 2X4's is to
provide a grid of nailers to attach the ceiling and that they have
no structural significance but I thought I'd better ask before I
rip them out.
Thanks,
George
|
12.306 | need more details | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Mon Feb 15 1988 08:44 | 14 |
| a couple of quick comments...
the 2X4's could possible be used to tie the wall of the dormer to the house. in
other words, the weight of the roof tends to push the wall away from the house
and the ceiling joists hold things together. if you remove them you MAY need to
use something else. then again, things may be OK as they are, it's hard to say
without actually seeing it.
another comment is insulation. there are several notes currently discussing
this. if you choose to go with a 2X6 ceiling, you can only put around 4" of
insulation in it and that ain't very warm. how are things insulated now? I
would assume you have more than 4" in the ceiling now...
-mark
|
12.307 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO | | Mon Feb 15 1988 09:17 | 20 |
| re: .1
It looks like there's about 6" of insulation now. I have to
take a better look but it appears that the 2X6 dormer roof rafters are
nailed directly to main roof rafters. I imagine that this is enough
to keep the dormer from pulling away from the house. Would it be
possible that the ceiling 2X4's are tying the dormers side walls
together.
The reason I'm even considering this is because right now I
have no access to the small space between the roof and the upstairs
room ceilings (if you can't get up there is it still called an attic?).
If the bathroom ceiling follows the dormer slope than I can put in
small door that would at least let me check things out up there
occasionally. I had a carpenter ant problem there last summer. Even
though the exterminator said he could get rid of them by spraying up
through the eaves, this year I'd like to have better access if I need it.
George
|
12.308 | My 2 cents' worth | ERLANG::BLACK | | Mon Feb 15 1988 10:56 | 30 |
| Suggestion: If what you want is an access door into the atic, the
build yourself an access door (or combine it with the framing for
a whole-house fan -- see some other note). If you want a cathedral
ceiling in your bathroom, then build that. However, don't get the
projects confused.
Re: Structural integrity. The top of the upstairs walls of your
house have a tendency to be pushed out by the weight of the roof.
Unless you have a load-bearing ridge beam, it is the rafters that
hold up the roof, and the walls that hold up the rafters, not the
the rafters that hold up the walls. The celing joists, stretching
from one side of the house to the other, are in tension as they
counteract that tendency. They can sometimes be removed, or raised,
or replaces by collar ties, but don't do this lightly.
Most of this remains true for a dormer. If you are at all unsure,
take some detailed drawings to a structural engineer ... before
you get out the saw.
Re: Insulation. A catherderal ceiling in a bathroom sounds like
a bad idea to me. Hecause that room gets hot andf steamy, you want good
insulation in the celing, with a vapour barrier, and plenty of
ventilation above the insulation, i.e., in the "attic". Also, how
do you put in something like a ceiling extractor fan?
It's your bathroom, but I would think really carefully about this.
Andrew
|
12.309 | I'll leave well enough alone | SALEM::PAGLIARULO | | Thu Feb 18 1988 19:21 | 7 |
| Thanks for the replies. I've decided to leave the ceiling as is
and sheetrock over the existing framing. There's enough work to
renovating a bathroom without throwing rebuilding the ceiling into
it. For access to the attic I'll put a door in above one of the
upstairs closets.
George
|
12.310 | Repainting chipping ceiling | SACMAN::GOLDEN | | Wed Mar 02 1988 13:30 | 22 |
| I am a first-time home owner (novice) and am in need of some advice.
My husband and I are in the beginning stages of painting the bedroom.
First of all, the house is 31 years old and we THINK the bedroom
ceiling has never been re-painted (the previous owners didn't like
painting!). Anyway, my husband started scraping the ceiling (we
saw a couple of places were it was peeling a little) and now it
appears there is no end to scraping this stuff off! I appears that
there is only 1 coat of ceiling paint and it's so old and dirty
that it looks grey.
Here's the problem. Should we continue to scrape the ceiling until
EVERY possible chip comes off and then sand it all down, or should
we just sand down the areas we have scraped down and start painting
from there. We're concerned that all the heavy scraping might damage
the original plaster and leave marks.
We DON'T want the textured ceiling and can't afford a professional
to do this, so any advice is appreciated!
Any advice from the "experts"?
Thanks....PG
|
12.311 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Wed Mar 02 1988 13:46 | 11 |
| If it's peeling "a little", I think your only hope for a decent
paint job is to scrape it all, then wash the ceiling with something
like TSP (the active ingredient in Spic'n'Span). Otherwise, odds
are almost guaranteed that your new paint job will start peeling
"a little" at some point, and keep peeling "a little" until it's
a real mess again.
If you REALLY have to work at scraping, if the old paint is REALLY
adhering to the ceiling, you can probably get away with washing
it down with TSP to get the dirt and grease off, then repainting.
In painting, surface preparation tends to be about 90% of the work.
|
12.312 | Scrape + paint remover | CSSE32::NICHOLS | HERB | Wed Mar 02 1988 14:22 | 26 |
| Since your house is 31 yrs old, I will assume that underneath the
paint is REAL plaster and NOT some form of dry wall. I scraped two
such ceilings down to bare plaster in our house using one of those
tools -somebody know the name?- that takes a single edge razor blade.
A kitchen, and a bathroom.
Better than 95% of the surface was stripped in about 2 hours completely
free of paint down to absolutely bare plaster and smooth as a baby's
tusch.
What to do about the remaining 5% of the surface area? I made the
mistake of continuing to use the little tool in an attempt to get
the rest of the paint off. I did get the paint off but also nicked
the plaster as well. In one case, that didn't matter since the ceiling
was about to be replastered (don't ask why i stripped it, was just
having a kind of perverse fun); but the other ceiling has some
noticeable nicks.!!
If you have a similar situation, follow my lead for the 1st 95%
of the work -if it doesn't come off easy, my advice doesn't help-
then use some kind of paint remover for the remaining stubborn little
blots. Make certain you read the instructions carefully when using
the paint remover. Many paint removers can be QUITE unpleasant and
typically require good ventilation.
good luck
h
|
12.335 | Metal ceilings | CRUNCH::ETHIER | | Tue Mar 15 1988 20:37 | 5 |
|
Are there any places in New England where I can by the
meterial for a metal ceiling? If so where?
Dave E.
|
12.336 | | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Mar 16 1988 08:16 | 4 |
| I'm not sure what you mean by metal ceiling. Do you mean the old patterned tin
ceilings?
Paul
|
12.337 | Renovator's Supply for tin ceiling panels | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Wed Mar 16 1988 08:54 | 8 |
| Renovator's Supply, in Mass (whose address is mentioned elsewhere)
is a source of tin panels. Also, within the last 6 months or so,
Old House Journal ran an article on installing and maintaing a tin
ceiling. I can't remember for sure, but there may have been a list
of suppliers with the article.
- Mark
|
12.338 | | EDUCA8::PHILBROOK | Chico's Daddy | Wed Mar 16 1988 14:38 | 7 |
| The original Post Office in the center of Amherst, NH is up for
sale. It's been converted to a single family home. It has all the
original tin ceilings. (I think it's listed for about $325K.)
Doesn't help the author, just an interesting sidebar.
MP
|
12.350 | textured ceiling over latex? | JACOB::TULLIE | | Wed Mar 16 1988 16:10 | 6 |
| I have plans to texture the ceiling in my bathroom. Someone told
me that if the ceiling is painted with a latex paint that the texture
won't stick. Anyone know if this is true?
Tom...
|
12.351 | Worked for me | HOCUS::OHARA | Mysterious Bagman | Wed Mar 16 1988 16:57 | 2 |
|
|
12.339 | thanks need more info | CRUNCH::ETHIER | | Wed Mar 16 1988 18:22 | 10 |
|
RE:1 yes I'm talking about tin ceilings.
RE: 2 thanks
RE: 3 interesting
Dave E.
|
12.340 | beautiful, but a lot of work.. | USWAV3::FAGERBERG | | Wed Mar 16 1988 19:50 | 14 |
|
we used to own a home, built by the Dowd family who were partners
with Benjamin Franklin. The dining room had an inlaid metal ceiling.
The room was 26 x 24. The moldings around the wall were 2' wide
by 1' thick (hollow of course). The panels were one foot square
and were recessed with a raised filagree type edge that was raised
above the grid. And a big chandalier in the middle. What a beautiful
piece of work. It was gun-metal blue. My mother wanted it white.
Using an oil based primer and paint, it took my father, three older
brothers and I eight nights to get it white!
Goog luck with your metal ceiling. With the quality of paints
today, it won't be toooo bad to paint and will hold its paint
longer.
|
12.352 | | FRSBEE::DEROSA | because a mind is a terrible thing | Thu Mar 17 1988 07:47 | 2 |
|
Worked for me too, been up for 5 years with no problems.
|
12.353 | Smooth is easier to clean | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Thu Mar 17 1988 08:09 | 5 |
| You might want to think twice before texturing the bathroom
ceiling. Have you ever tried to clean mildew off of a rough surface?
=Ralph=
(BTW I think the stuff will stick fine)
|
12.341 | | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Mar 17 1988 09:10 | 3 |
| I've seen ads for it in Fine Homebuilding, every issue.
Paul
|
12.342 | confused.... | FDCV14::DUNN | Karen Dunn 223-2651 | Thu Mar 17 1988 09:25 | 14 |
|
Ok, please clue me in.
When I originally read this, I thought that maybe tin ceilings were
put in to get pretty patterns, filagree, etc. and would be left bare
so the effect would show.
then the last reply talked about painting it and blew that theory.
So now I'm confused. Why would someone put in a metal ceiling? wouldn't the
paint fill in any detail and waste the effect? I'm sure I've seen one, and
I'm sure it was painted, but at the time I didn't realize it was metal.
This is really interesting !!
|
12.343 | | SLTERO::KENAH | My journey begins with my first step | Thu Mar 17 1988 11:01 | 10 |
| Tin ceilings do have pretty patterns, which may be over an inch
or two in depth. A few coats of paint won't obscure this.
However, the idea of painting a real tin ceiling is (to me)
sacrilegious.
By the bye, I've seen plastic reproductions of tin ceilings.
(4' x 8' sheets) Sorry, don't know if/where they're available.
andrew
|
12.354 | no problems here | CSMADM::SCHWABE | | Thu Mar 17 1988 12:42 | 8 |
|
Used a latex primer and then rented a sprayer and sprayed a texture
onto my kitchen ceiling. So far no problems.
I have a texture ceiling in my bathroom and have no mildew problems.
I suppose it depends on what kind of ventilation you have.
|
12.344 | OHJ and Maynard | VIDEO::DCL | David Larrick | Thu Mar 17 1988 13:48 | 11 |
| I read recently in the Old House Journal that, beautiful as they are, tin
ceilings were usually installed to cover up cracked plaster ceilings. They
were seldom installed as part of new construction.
OHJ also stated that tin ceiling panels _need_ to be painted, to keep the
metal from rusting. (Remember, the metal from which non-rusting "tin cans"
are made isn't pure tin - I think it's mostly chromium.)
Several stores in beautiful downtown Maynard have tin ceilings with decades
of paint, and they still show considerable detail. I suspect that they're
present in many more stores, hidden above suspended ceilings.
|
12.355 | Thanks | JACOB::TULLIE | | Thu Mar 17 1988 15:02 | 6 |
| Thanks for all the input. I just installed a fan in the bathroom so
I had hoped that would take care of the mildew problem. Perhaps
I should leave the ceiling smooth for a while and see if the problem
still exists with the fan.
Tom...
|
12.345 | Avery's in Nashua - but not for sale. | ERLANG::BLACK | | Thu Mar 17 1988 16:05 | 9 |
| Avery's furniture store in downtown Nashua also has a tim ceiling.
At least, I rembr that the part where they keep the carpet samples
on the ground floor is tin.
An excellent store for traditional furniture, btw. They've beenthere
for over a century, but the ceiling may be younger!
Andrew
|
12.346 | installer | JENEVR::GRISE | Tony Grise | Thu Mar 17 1988 16:49 | 8 |
|
A friend of mine in Manchester NH installs tin ceilings, ( and
other types of suspended ceilings ) for a living. He does
exceptional work and is very busy. Tin ceilings are becoming
more popular these days.
Tony
|
12.347 | Addresses on Monday | AKOV88::BROWN | The more the merrier! | Fri Mar 18 1988 09:31 | 17 |
| I bought a tin ceiling for the pantry of our Victorian farmhouse (built
in 1894), but have never installed it. Now that we're selling and
moving to a 200-year old Colonial, anybody want to buy a 5' by 10'
tin ceiling?
To answer the original question, I'll bring in the name and address of
the company I ordered from -- their selection is the largest I've seen
and the prices were pretty reasonable. The company is W. F. Norman;
I've also seen ads for a couple other companies, I'll try to find them
again too.
Love those ceilings, but I guess they won't really look appropriate
in our new (old) house... sigh.
Jan who_is_counting_the_days_to_closing
|
12.348 | W.F. Norman info | AKOV68::BROWN | The more the merrier! | Fri Mar 25 1988 08:56 | 21 |
| The latest Old House Journal Catalog I have says the following about
W.F. Norman Corp.:
"This company is again producing an 81-year old line of metal ceiling,
wainscotting, wall panels, cornices, mouldings and metal Spanish Tile
roofing. Patterns come in many architectural styles: Greek, Gothic,
Rococo, Colonial Revival. Unique patterns; made from original dies.
Write for Ceiling Catalog No. 350 - $3.00. Also, (800) 641-4038."
My catalog is the 1983 edition, if you are really interested you might
want to give them a call and see if the price is still $3.00. They
have a much wider selection than Renovators Supply but they aren't
exactly located in New England!
W. F. Norman Corporation
P.O. Box 323
Nevada, MO 64772
Jan
|
12.304 | Ta-Daa | HYDRA::JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Fri Mar 25 1988 09:24 | 11 |
| Well, the panels are all up (but not painted yet). I like having
each panel cut separately. I can move them easily to get at the
pipes and stuff that is up in the ceiling. Besides, there's no
way in h*ll that I would be able to lift a full-size piece into
place.
No visible sag, at least not yet.
Steve
|
12.349 | THANKS | CRUNCH::ETHIER | | Fri Mar 25 1988 21:09 | 7 |
|
RE: 13
THANKS JAN
|
12.12 | Quite pleased with mine | LARVAE::MARTIN | | Mon May 23 1988 05:42 | 14 |
| I've just had a room about 30 feet by 12 plastered and we used both
techniques mentioned earlier in this note.
We left the old ceiling where it was and nailed up to it new board
ready for plastering. This is an awkward job so I cut the board
into about 3 foot lengths as I could handle these.
On some walls we wanted to plaster over bits of existing plaster
and over some cement that the previous plaster had come away from.
Solution was a proprietory glue that we splashed all over the walls.
No point in me mentioning products by name as I used local products
which presumably are by firms not trading in the USA. Have a word
with your building material supplier.
|
12.313 | Bathroom paint problem.... | CRONIC::SARAO | I won't say 'I can't' | Mon Jun 06 1988 11:27 | 19 |
|
I have a very bad situation in my bathroom that I'll be doing over
shortly. I have a flat latex paint that is starting to chip over by the
shower.
Do I:
A. Chip and sand the ceiling and wash with TSP or Spic n' Span.
Then apply an "OIL" based paint over this with the mildew
resistor mixed in.
B. Chip and sand the ceiling and wash with TSP or Spic n' Span.
Then apply an "LATEX" based paint over this with the mildew
resistor mixed in.
C. Do it another way....
|
12.314 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Mon Jun 06 1988 14:03 | 4 |
| I would simply chip off all the bad spots. Patch with joint compound,
and paint over with oil-based semi-gloss paint. That's worked in
our bathrooms for a year now (check out the Touraine triple-white for
ceilings).
|
12.315 | Oil-based gloss holds up to lots of H20 | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Mon Jun 06 1988 15:00 | 8 |
|
Some idiot painted my shower surround with a glossy oil-based paint.
It seems to have help up surprisingly well (although it looks
terrible), so I think oil-based semi-gloss would probably work
well for a bathroom ceiling.
-tm
|
12.356 | Ceiling Water Stain Removal | DECSIM::TAYLOR | | Wed Jul 13 1988 16:44 | 12 |
| I have a couple of water stains on my ceiling (the bumpy, stucco-type
ceiling, white) which I'd like to remove without have to paint the
whole ceiling. If try to do a paint touch up, I'm afraid that the
freshly painted area will stand out too much.
My building inspector had reccommended spraying bleach on it. I
tried this which didn't work too well and made me ill from the fumes.
Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks.
Mathew Taylor
|
12.357 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Jul 14 1988 09:19 | 3 |
| bleach almost always works for me. did you put it on heavy enough?
-mark
|
12.358 | BIN | MCIS2::CHIN | | Thu Jul 14 1988 17:54 | 1 |
| A contractor told us to use something called BIN.
|
12.359 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Thu Jul 14 1988 18:32 | 5 |
| BIN is a white stain sealer - you may have a color match problem for
your application
its used to SEAL stains before painting over them - keeps them from
bleeding thru
|
12.360 | | ANGORA::ZARLENGA | Yo! Malllooorrreee! | Fri Jul 15 1988 14:27 | 12 |
| Chlorox bleach sprayed on will remove the stains.
Wear goggles and a surgical mask and the fumes won't bother
you (too much). Don't forget a dropcloth !! And a good shower
afterward.
I've heard of a product called KILL-X (?) that is a bleach that
won't leave chloride salts behind (you should brush the ceiling after
using Chlorox) but no one seemed to know where to find it when I
needed it.
-mike z
|
12.13 | better late than never.... | MERLAN::RIETER | | Thu Aug 04 1988 14:04 | 19 |
| This is a little after-the-fact (all these replies are pretty old),
but as we have used a couple methods, I wanted to add my 3 cents.
Someone mentioned ceiling buttons. We did that in two rooms, they
worked well & it came out great. It was, however, hard work and
time consuming to get the ceilings real flat and smooth after.
Just recently we had this guy from Somerville in to do two more
ceilings. He built staging to bring him up closer to the ceiling,
put up sheetrock (blue board?) right over the old plaster, and then
skim coated the whole thing with a smooth finish. Total cost?
$185. It's beautiful work, too. I don't have his name & phone,
but if someone is interested, send me mail, and I will look into
it. A friend of mine arranged for him to come down and do the work
at the same time his was being done. Oh, by the way, it only took
him a couple hours....he was really fast. Did almost the whole
house for my friend in one day!
Sue
|
12.14 | What's his name? | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Thu Aug 04 1988 17:20 | 12 |
| >> Just recently we had this guy from Somerville in to do two more
>> ceilings. He built staging to bring him up closer to the ceiling,
>> put up sheetrock (blue board?) right over the old plaster, and then
>> skim coated the whole thing with a smooth finish. Total cost?
>>$185.
That's *really* cheap for just sheetrock (I can't beleive he put
up blueboard that fast or that cheap). Please put him in the
contractor referral section if you can find his name.
-tm
|
12.363 | sheetrocking the peak of a cathedral ceiling | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Sep 28 1988 18:01 | 19 |
| I'm getting ready to hang some sheet rock on a cathedral ceiling and am looking
for tips for securing it to the peak.
/|
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
/ |
The slope isn't really this bad (only 30 degrees). I think if I were to put
up the wall first I can use the ceiling cavity to hold teh screw gun and
therefore get a tight fit. As far as the ceiling, there's really no way to get
at the very top, but if I wedge the rock into the notch, wouldn't that hold?
How do the pros do it?
-mark
|
12.364 | | KELVIN::TAYLOR | | Thu Sep 29 1988 09:24 | 13 |
| Mark, When I did my bedroom, which has a 10' cathedral ceiling,
I did the ceiling first, my father and I used 2 step ladders,
to get the sheetrock up there and then I screwed it into
place, one end butted to the wall and the other to the carrying
beam, I left about 1/2" gap at the carrying beam end nad
when the sheetrock was in place and painted, I boxed the
beam (4 2x12's) in with pine and then trimmed it with
3/4" cove molding. Personally, I would hang the ceiling first
and then the walls...
Royce
|
12.365 | try using nails instead | SVCRUS::CRANE | | Thu Sep 29 1988 10:51 | 8 |
|
Don't be afraid to use sheetrock nails on the part that you can't
get to with the screw gun. Put as many screws as possible in and
then secure the rest with nails, You can get a hammer in to spots
where a screw gun is too long to fit.
John C.
|
12.366 | | AKOV13::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Thu Sep 29 1988 12:35 | 7 |
| I agree with putting the ceiling up first. This is going to have
more downward pressure than the wall. Therefore, it will need more
support. The wall, when wedged into the corner and nailed as far
up as you can go should only have downward pressure straight down.
This is better than pressure away from the studs.
Ed..
|
12.367 | Raising Tool | CHOVAX::GILSON | | Thu Sep 29 1988 12:44 | 7 |
| There is a dandy appliance/tool that you can rent to help raise
and hold the sheetrock. Cost was about $25.00 for the day when
we used it several years ago. I don't recall its proper name, but
when we described what we were doing, the rental store provided
just what we needed.
P.S. Another vote for doing the ceiling first.
|
12.368 | Another hint: | GWYNED::MCCABE | | Thu Sep 29 1988 13:17 | 14 |
| I would also do the ceiling first. You can screw in a piece of
strapping as a ledger board to take most of the weight of the
sheetrock. All you have to do is hold the sheetrock against it.
if you want to get really fancy take a couple of scraps of strapping
about 6" to a foot and screw them together overlapping the top piece
about an inch. When you hoist the sheetrock in place place this
offset jig under the sheetrock and screw it with 2" screws to the
roof rafter. You will need a couple of these. They will support
the sheet and the offset will keep it in place. When I get to the
top of the ceiling I switch to a Makita right angle drill with a
#2 bit in the chuck to drive the screws, it only takes up about
3" of room.
Chris
|
12.214 | Suspended Ceiling Advice Needed | PIGGY::FERRARI | | Wed Oct 12 1988 13:53 | 17 |
| Without starting a new note, I figured this would be the best topic
to place this question under.
I'm in the process of re-doing the entire kitchen, and the ceiling
looks pretty bad. It's wallboard, and the tape is starting to yellow
and there's almost more cracks than ceiling. Instead of tearing
it out and putting up new wallboard and then have the enjoyment
of dust ALL over, as well as the mudding and taping and sanding
and dust and sanding and dust, etc..., We've (she's) decided on
a suspended ceiling. Does anyone have any advice regarding a suspended
ceiling as far as the process, is it relatively easy, and cost?
Thanks for all answers.
Gene
(BTW - the room is about 11'6" x 15'3".)
|
12.215 | Choice of Looks | WORSEL::DOTY | Russell Doty, ESG | Wed Oct 12 1988 14:11 | 10 |
| Suspended ceilings are inexpensive, easy to install -- and look
like suspended ceilings. I've put them up in basement rooms; the
job is easy if you do a little measuring first. Check some homeowners
books for complete description of the job.
Anothe alternative would be to simply add new sheetrock over the
existing ceiling -- just run sheetrock screws through both layers
and into the ceiling rafters (you'll have to locate the rafters,
but poking some holes through the old ceiling is no problem). You
still have to tape and sand, though.
|
12.216 | | STROKR::DEHAHN | | Wed Oct 12 1988 15:34 | 5 |
|
Or you can use sand paint, it covers the nasties
CdH
|
12.217 | some are quite nice | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Wed Oct 12 1988 16:27 | 12 |
| RE: .6, a suspended ceiling doesn't have to look that way, it all
depends on what you want to spend. Cheap tiles will look like typical
"suspended ceilings", but there are many better grades. I did a
family room with a top of the line Armstrong a few years back that
looked like carved plaster. The key to making it look good is to
use hangers (supports, or whatever the proper name is) from the
same manufacturer as the tiles. Though they may be twice as expensive
and often hard to find, they are a perfect color match and (at least
with the Armstrong units), much better built.
Eric
|
12.218 | not in a kitchen | PARITY::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Wed Oct 12 1988 19:50 | 12 |
| re: .6
Kitchens generate a lot of grease. I would be very concerned
with how easy it is to keep the surface of the tiles clean.
The ones I am familiar with are very porous and would trap
grease and odors. Anyone out there have any experience with
using a suspended ceiling in a kitchen environment and want to
comment? Personally I don't think they sound like the right
solution for a kitchen or bathroom; other rooms would probably
be fine.
-JFK-
|
12.219 | Wiring thru the ceiling?? | PIGGY::FERRARI | | Thu Oct 13 1988 11:29 | 41 |
| Well, to further complicate matters.....
I stopped @ Grossman's last nite and the "specialist" was extremely
helpful. Suspended ceilings are easy and inexpensive, however,
they often look that way, unless I want to spend $$$. He didn't
recommend them in a kitchen, however, because of the grease buildup,
etc., and tho the panels say they're washable, he's yet to see one.
Anyway, he recommended putting up new sheetrock right over the old,
using 2 1/2" screws, then taping and mudding the seams and using
textured paint to eliminate the mess of sanding.
I checked the ceiling last nite, and it isn't really _that_ bad.
The majority of cracks is actually the old tape becoming brittle
and cracking and yellowing. The ceiling is solid; I pressed at
the seams and got very little, if any movement. I'm thinking of
re-taping and mudding and using textured paint on the existing ceiling.
I would be the cheapest way out, and we don't plan on living there
forever, so if it cracks again in 3 to 5 years, let someone else
worry about it.
This does present a slight problem, however. I'm replacing the
wiring in the entire house, and I planned on running the kitchen
lite on 3-way switches. I can connect the 3-way wire easiest by
running it under the floor, in the basement. I use a few extra
feet of wire, but it beats ripping out a wall where I don't have
to. My question is, if I do stay with the existing ceiling, how
can I run a wire from the wall switch to the light? I realize I
may have to punch a little hole @ the top of the wall, but how about
from the top of the wall to the light, a distance of 6-8 feet?
I was thinking of cutting a trough in the ceiling and running the
wire to the light, pushing the wire in as deep as possible without
chopping out the joists, then mudding and taping the trough, so
the wire essentially runs through the wallboard. Is that possible?
I realize it may not be up to code, but is it the easiest way?
Does anyone have a better idea? ( I can't tap into the existing
wire at the light and pull the new one through, because the wiring
is mis-mash now, the light is a pull chain, not a wall switch, and
I don't have the vaguest idea where the light draws its juice.
It may come from the bedroom above it.)
Thanks again for all advice.
Gene
|
12.220 | a couple of ideas | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Thu Oct 13 1988 13:43 | 19 |
| two suggestions:
one other possibility for the ceiling is a staple up type which is NOT
those ugly 12" square tiles. Grossman's sells a type which looks like
random length and random width tougue and groove boards but is white. it's
really quite acceptable in the looks dept. but i think it costs more than
sheet rock. you might want to check though.
regardless of how you cover the ceiling the time to snake wires is before
you do it. if you are running wire with the ceiling/floor joists you are
in luck. if not maybe you should go that way anyway and then run across the
basement ceiling. anyway, cut open a hole near the wall above the switch.
you should be able to fish a wire from the lite to that hole. then getting
from that hole to the switch should also be managable. there are about 6
ways to wire up a three way switch, sometimes a way that requires more wire
is easier than the most apparant way.
craig
|
12.369 | Installing T&G wood ceiling | MEMV02::ROGUSKA | | Thu Oct 20 1988 14:46 | 13 |
| We are planning to install a T&G ceiling in our country kitchen.
We have not decided on what type of wood yet, but have a more basic
question.......
Our current plan is to sheetrock the entire room, including the
ceiling, then install the T & G wood over the sheetrock. Does this
make sense or is it over kill to install the sheetrock?
What is the proper method of installation for the T & G? None of
the DIY books we have at home address this. Thanks for the help
- all opinions welcome!
Kathy
|
12.370 | Cedar T&G | CLBMED::AKOZAK | | Thu Oct 20 1988 16:25 | 34 |
| I have just finished a ceiling with 1"x8" Cedar tongue and groove.
I used the cedar in an ouside application (a gazebo), but it wasn't
that difficult.
As to the question of sheetrock, I don't know why you'd want to do
that. The T&G presents more that a reasonable stiffness on a normal
installation, that is where the joists are 16" on center.
Installing the T&G is a reasonable, but a fairly time consuming
process.
1. Make certain that the end of each plank is square. If it isn't,
you can throw the whole installation off. You can square it with
your table saw or with a hand square.
2. When you go to install, you only need a rubber mallet to butt
together the boards. Be careful when hitting the edge, because
it is fairly easy to break and/or crack.
3. When nailing, you don't need to nail on an angle from one board
to another, because the T&G really makes a nice fit. It is up to
you, as to what kind of nails to use, but finish will be real nice.
4. Don't completely drive the nail, but go almost to the end.
Finish driving by using a sink. If you hit the cedar with the hammer,
you will mark it.
I hope this helps. For my money, I like cedar. It is stain resistant
and fairly odor resistant too(good for a kitchen). One of the nicest
things about cedar, is it can continually be sanded down to release
the preservatives so special to cedar.
Questions? Give me a call
|
12.371 | T&G Cedar | SEESAW::PILANT | L. Mark Pilant | Fri Oct 21 1988 11:01 | 25 |
| The family room I built (20'x24' with a vaulted ceiling 8' to 14')
is almost completely done with 1"x6" T&G red cedar (walls and ceiling).
The biggest pain was installing all the 1"x3" stapping; because
the cedar was parallel to the studs and rafters. I went the overkill
route and screwed all the strapping in, because I didn't want to
worry about it becoming loose (and I also had 25lbs of drywall screws
to use up :-). The actual cedar was put up using 8d finish nails.
I'll second everything mentioned in .1, and add an additional comment
about squaring the ends. You should definitely insure that the
end is square with the width of the board. However, I have been
told that it is also a good idea to back cut when cross-cutting.
(Instead of having the blade perpendicular to the table, make it
2 or 3 degrees off, i.e., 87 or 88 degrees). This is supposed to
allow the ends to butt with a minimal seam. Note that I found out
about this technique after I had finished, but I'll keep it in mind
to try out in the future.
Also, make sure that you have a *good* (carbide) cutoff blade in
your saw. (I used a Freud LM85M10, 80 tooth 10" carbide, blade
in my radial arm saw.) It will minimize tearout, and limit the
amount of finish work needed to the cross-cut end.
- Mark
|
12.373 | where to put collar ties in cathedral ceiling | STEREO::COUTURE | Gary Couture - Govt. Syst. Group - Merrimack NH | Thu Nov 03 1988 09:35 | 8 |
| I have just completed my 12'X11' breezeway which connects my house and garage.
I am putting in a cathedral ceiling but I have a question about where to place
the collar ties. How high up should collar ties be placed?? The roof pitch is
11/12, rafters are 2X6 and i plan to use 2X6's for the ties. I thought 1 to
2 feet down from the peak.
gary
|
12.374 | | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Nov 04 1988 09:55 | 5 |
| How high is the ceiling?
Are you going to sheetrock the ceiling?
Do you want the collar ties to show after sheetrocking, or are you
going to attach sheetrock to the bottom of the collar ties?
|
12.375 | re -.2 | STEREO::COUTURE | Gary Couture - Govt. Syst. Group - Merrimack NH | Mon Nov 07 1988 16:57 | 6 |
| room in 12' wide with 11/12 pitch gives about 8' + 5' = 13' to peak from floor.
I will sheetrock ceiling and under collar ties.
What I need to know is structural requirements... I may have a couple exposed
beams but for the most part the collar ties will do all the support which would
normally be done by joists.
|
12.376 | As with all things. It depends | DELNI::MCCABE | If Murphy's Law can go wrong .. | Mon Nov 07 1988 17:20 | 14 |
| If you'd used 2x10 you'd have been able to do the rafters 2'0" o.c.
The collar ties would be at joist level every other rafter (e.g.
one at 4' and one at 8').
With 2x6 rafters I'd guess you went 16" o.c. The collars need to
be at least on every other joist.
If you wanted completely open you'd need to have a supported ridge
beam.
If you want to put the collars up high you might get a 10' ceiling
out of it.
|
12.377 | clarification | STEREO::COUTURE | Gary Couture - Govt. Syst. Group - Merrimack NH | Mon Nov 07 1988 18:02 | 34 |
| > If you'd used 2x10 you'd have been able to do the rafters 2'0" o.c.
> The collar ties would be at joist level every other rafter (e.g.
> one at 4' and one at 8').
yes, as I said the cathedral ceiling was an afterthought. Originally I
was going to put ceiling joists (2X6) 16"oc
> With 2x6 rafters I'd guess you went 16" o.c. The collars need to
> be at least on every other joist.
yes 16 oc
> If you wanted completely open you'd need to have a supported ridge
> beam.
yes the construction is 2x6 rafters, 16" oc, with a 2x10 ridge pole. The
room connects the house and garage so one end (the house) has ridge pole
supported via joist hanger and the first rafter pair nailed to house, the
other end angles onto garage roof. So the chance of ell roof sagging or
spreading I think is minimal. But I think its still good to put the collar
ties in at the peak.
> If you want to put the collars up high you might get a 10' ceiling
> out of it.
thats what Im looking for is where they must be placed to meet
"common building code". too high and they may not serve their
purpose, too low will make room look less "cathedral". I heard once
that the general rule of thumb is 1/3 the way down from peak to
top of wall but that was a generealization and I want to keep them
as high as possible.
|
12.378 | add a central beam..it looks good | TOLKIN::RIDGE | | Tue Nov 08 1988 12:50 | 15 |
| Suggestion: Why not run one support beam across the whole thing,
and skip the collar ties. You can support one end of the beam
with the house and the other with the garage.
When I put on my addition and garage this is what I did. (Or the
contractor did at my request). A notch was cut in the side of the
existing house to fit the beam. 2x? support was inserted in the
wall cavity to support the beam, and get it to the right height.
The other end was supported by a 2x6(?) beam that ran straight
down to the foundation.
The beam can be added even though your rafters are already up.
Steve
|
12.379 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Nov 09 1988 09:14 | 14 |
| Collar ties are relatively light weight tension members (often only 2x4 or
2x3) that keep the rafters from spreading. The higher they are, the less
well they work. Building codes should be clear on whether you need them
at all (but I don't have building codes). If you have a cathedral ceiling,
do I understand that you don't have normal ceiling joists? In that case
I would expect that you need some transverse tension members to keep the
walls from falling over into the yard, and low, heavier collar ties would be
needed.
I don't understand .5 at all. Where does the "beam" you mention connect
to keep the roof from spreading? From your description, I infer that
this beam runs parallel to the ridge pole. Is this what you meant?
- tom powers]
|
12.380 | What size beam? Glad you asked. | MAMIE::BERKNER | Tom Berkner 264-7942 MK01 | Wed Nov 09 1988 10:15 | 23 |
| I doubt if your building code specifies the location of collar ties.
Usually, the code will state the live load (snow, wind, etc) that
must be carried by the roof. You add to this the dead load (rafters,
decking, roofing, and plasterboard) to determine the total load.
Typical examples are live = 30#
dead = 10#
Total = 40#
The area of your roof is 11' X 12' or 132sq'sq' This time 40# per
sq ft = total load of 5280 pounds. One half of this load is carried
by the outside walls leaving 2640 lbs to be supported by a beam
in the center. This assumes you want to place a beam parallel to
the ridge board, directly under it and fasten the rafters to the
beam (a very reasonable thing to do). The next part of the calculation
requires knowledge of what material (southern yellow pine, western
douglas fir, eastern hemlock, etc) you will use for the beam. From
the shear and elasticity of the wood, you can calculate the size
of the beam to carry this load over the given span with an allowable
deflection (typically 1/240th). The equations can be found in
"Architectural Graphics Standards" amoung other places. If you
give me the above information, I'll do the calculation for you and
calculate the size of the posts needed at each end to support the
beam.
|
12.381 | Beam supports the Ridge | TOLKIN::RIDGE | | Fri Nov 11 1988 12:58 | 4 |
| Yes, the beam is the Ridge pole. It runs parralel to the ridge.
Not my relatives, the roof ridge.
Steve Ridge
|
12.382 | | CURIE::BBARRY | | Tue Nov 15 1988 12:14 | 7 |
| To provide adequate support the collar ties should be in the
middle third of the rafters. Typically, the collar ties are 1/3
the way down to provide maximum headroom. 1x2/1x3 strapping should be
nailed across the collar ties at 16" O.C. Sheetrock should
then be attached to the strapping.
Brian
|
12.383 | thanks but what about insulation | STEREO::COUTURE | Gary Couture - Govt. Syst. Group - Merrimack NH | Wed Nov 16 1988 08:29 | 6 |
| re -.1
Thanks, that was tho info I was looking for, but one other thing, I plan
on putting up 1" rigid insulation before I sheetrock. should the insul go on
before or after strapping and can I get by without the strapping altogether?
|
12.384 | I like strapping | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Nov 16 1988 19:40 | 10 |
| Strapping is an interesting subject. I recently put up lots of strapping.
Personally, I think it's a good�idea for a couple of reasons. For I would
think it would help keep the rafters from twisting - in my case I have 2X12's.
Then, in my case I found that the afters didn't line up perfectly - If I put
a straight edge across them there might be some gaps that varied by as much as
1/4". I know that that's not really that much but my fear was that with smooth
ceiling, I might see ripples. Strappign gave me the ability to put in lots of
shims and get a real level surface.
-mark
|
12.385 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Nov 17 1988 11:27 | 19 |
| > Thanks, that was tho info I was looking for, but one other thing, I plan
> on putting up 1" rigid insulation before I sheetrock. should the insul go on
> before or after strapping and can I get by without the strapping altogether?
If you hang strapping from the collar ties (if you use them), why limit
yourself to rigid insulation? Put fiberglass batts or equivalent
between the collar ties, on top of the strapping. That's the way
ceilings are insulated on traditional ceiling joist/strapping systems.
If you're talking about strapping to the rafters all the way up
to the ridge, that's a different matter. Do the ventilating requirements
of an open attic apply to such an installation? Is there room
for airflow from eaves to ridge if you used, say, 6" fiberglass
between, say, 10" or 12" rafters? Again, between strapping and roof.
- tom]
PS: I understand .5 now (per my question in .6). You are suggesting
what amount to a humugous ridge pole with vertical support at the ends.
|
12.386 | | STEREO::COUTURE | Gary Couture - Govt. Syst. Group - Merrimack NH | Thu Nov 17 1988 11:46 | 5 |
| re .12
I plan on installing propa vents between rafters, insulating between
rafters with 6" insul and THEN putting 1" rigid over everything.
|
12.387 | Suspended Ceilings | GERBIL::LADEW | | Mon Dec 19 1988 13:22 | 5 |
| I'm planning to install a suspended ceiling in my basement this
winter. I would appreciate any comments and hints on the pit falls,
watch outs and so on. Also where is a good place to buy tracks and
panels in the Nashua area?
|
12.388 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Dec 19 1988 14:42 | 7 |
| Would you believe 2887 notes without one on suspended ceilings? I already had
it locked because I was sure it was already here, but then I looked in the
directories and found nothing.
So what do you people know about suspended ceilings?
Paul
|
12.390 | same brand tiles and hangers | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Thu Dec 22 1988 09:00 | 8 |
| The nicest touch I found was to use the hangers that are made by
the same manufacturer as the ceiling tiles. A few years back, I
did a ceiling with Armstrong "Victoria" tiles and Armstrong hangers-it
was a perfect color match. The hanger grid was more expensive that
the regularly stocked brand, but it was MUCH stronger and matched
the color perfectly.
Eric
|
12.391 | Don't suspend it too low | HANNAH::REITH | | Thu Dec 22 1988 09:22 | 4 |
| I saw something go by yesterday about using 1 foot clearance for tile
installation/removal ease. This is fine with 10 foot ceilings but in a
basement it could become a problem. You may suddenly feel MUCH taller.
Not everyone opts for a full 8 foot basement so your mileage may vary.
|
12.392 | Tips from ex-pro | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Thu Dec 22 1988 09:50 | 40 |
| I've done several of these, professionally and otherwise.
Some tips.
Getting something that big level is tricky. A spirit level is way
too short. It's easy to trace around the perimiter of a room and
be 6" off due to cumulative error. Try using a water level (hose
full of water) or even better, if you beg or borrow a builder's
level (transit), it will make life so much easier - just put it
in the middle of the room and swing it around.
On the same subject, do NOT assume the bottom of the ceiling joists
are level. They are probably not even close. Use an independemt
reference (like the floor or the method in the previous paragraph).
Cutting cross tees and edge angles is problematic. Tin snips distort
them too much. Hacksaws are better but painfully slow. For a large
ceiling I put an abrasive cut-off wheel in a table saw and that worked
great.
Note that you need at least some clearance upward to insert the
panels and then drop them down onto the grid. I made the mistake
once of putting the grid flush against some ductwork and found I
couldn't get the panel in without incredible gyrations.
The translucent panels they make for lights are incredibly chintzy
and will fall out and break very easily. Look for sturdier ones
(like the ones you see in DEC offices).
Don't buy cheap panels. The whole system depends on the weight
of the panels holding things in place. Light, cheap ones never
lay flat correctly.
Suspended ceilings are a necessary evil for situations where you
need access to the infrastructure. In the best of circumstances
they have an amateur DIY look to them (usually helped along by the
1/64 thick embossed fake wood paneling that appears in conjunction
on the walls). If your expectations are set properly and the rest
of the room is finished in a decent manner you will be ahead of
the game - it's not really hard stuff to do.
|
12.406 | raising the ceiling | SNODOG::SYSTEM | | Thu Dec 22 1988 13:19 | 15 |
|
I am redoing a small room in my house. I would like to raise the
ceiling a few inches to make the room less claustraphobic. The
existing ceiling is about 6 1/2 feet. The house is a one story and
the area above the room is just a crawl space which is inaccessible.
The roof is pitched with about 4 feet between the ceiling and the
ridge.
I would like to know how difficult this is, if it is at all possible.
Can I remove the ceiling (which appears to be wallboard) and raise the
ceiling joists or is there a lot more to it?
Any suggestions or personal experiences would be appreciated.
Steve
|
12.407 | Answer these Questions | CURIE::BBARRY | | Tue Dec 27 1988 15:23 | 16 |
| Is there any wiring in the ceiling?
Is there any plumbing in the ceiling?
Do you have blown in insulation?
Is your roof made with roof trusses?
Are there any bearing walls supporting the middle of the ceiling?
Did you have trouble understanding any of these questions?
The more "yes" answers you have the more difficult the job will be.
I started to write a long reply to this question, but decided what you
really need is a drawing, and I need the answers to these questions.
Brian
P.S. Using a system account is poor notes etiquette, unless your name
is Steve System.
|
12.408 | some more questions | CNTROL::CHEBBANI | | Thu Dec 29 1988 09:01 | 27 |
| If you have 4 feet croll space, I assume that you also have roof
and ceiling rafters. In this case you are talking about a major
job to raise the ceiling regardless to what you have from electric
wiring, plumbing and insulation.
What we are talking about here is:
o removing all the elect, plumb, and insulation
o removing the roof
o removing the existing ceiling
o raising the walls (optional)
o use the inside of your roof as the ceiling
The reason I recommended removing your ceiling and also your roof
is because your roof is supported by the ceiling rafters, therefore
you can not just simply remove the ceiling.
I recommend that you think about rebuilding the whole floor if you
are going to spend all this money on just removing all these parts
of your house.
Or simply just live with it the way it is now...
Can you tell me if I gessed correctly about your ceiling and roof
rafters?
Good luck if you are going to go trough it.
Regards
Abed
|
12.411 | Jacking Up Ceiling To Remove Bearing Wall | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Thu Dec 29 1988 09:32 | 35 |
| I need to jack up a ceiling so that I can remove a bearing wall and
replace it with a beam to open up two rooms. Never having done this before I'd
like to check what I plan to do before proceeding. My plan is to use a jack
and 4X4's about 2 1\2 feet out on each side of the bearing wall. I'll jack up
the ceiling 3/8", build temporary walls 2 ft out from each side of the wall to
be removed and lower the ceiling back onto the temporary walls. The temporary
walls will provide 1/2" of claearance for me to place the beam and I will use
plywood or some other material between both the the 4X4's and temporary walls
and the ceiling to help distribute the pressure so that I don't damage the
ceiling (I hope). Once the bearing wall is removed and the beam placed and
secure, I'll jack up the ceiling again, remove the temporary walls and lower
the ceiling onto the beam...Voila! open living.
Now for some questions:
Is 3/8" to much to jack things up? Should I go for a lesser amount?
If necessary I can leave less than 1/2" to place the beam, maybe only 1/8th.
The span I want to remove is 11' 10". Should I use 2 jacks per side?
Is this the best way to __________ ceiling
jack things up or is ========
there a better way to place | ^
the jack and 4X4's? | |
|<-- 4X4's
=<--jack
How strong do the support walls have to be? Should they be built like
normal bearing walls (double plates etc)?
Am I out of my mind for doing this?
Thanks for any insight.
George
|
12.412 | Heres what I did | MUSKIE::BLACK | just hanging around ... again | Thu Dec 29 1988 09:49 | 18 |
|
Well, jacking up the ceiling could cause problems for whatever is
above it!
I did a similiar thing a few years ago. I just used a floor plate,
a ceiling plate and 2X4 s about 16" oc for the temporary support walls.
I made the temporary studs a smidgeon long (~1/16") and drove them
in place. So I didn't really raise the ceiling much at all. I then
put in a beam and took out the temporary walls. When I sold the house
about 10 - 12 years later, no cracks or anything like that had ever
shown up.
Mine was in the basement so there was no ceiling finish to worry
about. You would have to be luckier than I am to do that and not
damage the ceiling finish somewhat.
You probably need a permit to do this but it is fairly straightforward.
|
12.413 | permit is taken care of | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Thu Dec 29 1988 09:53 | 4 |
| I go for the permit today. The building inspector has already checked
beam sizing, support placement and whatnot.
George
|
12.409 | Roof Does Not Need to be Removed | CURIE::BBARRY | | Thu Dec 29 1988 10:14 | 34 |
| Re: 2894.2
> o removing the roof
If the the roof is stick built, then the roof does not have to be moved,
IF the ceiling joist will be in the lower 1/3 of the height of the
roof. If the height is 4 ft then the roof could be raised upto
8"-10" above the side walls taken into account the depth of the joists.
The key is to put up the new joists BEFORE removing the old.
> o raising the walls (optional)
The side walls do not have to be raised. If there is a center bearing
wall, it would have to be raised to support the new joists. The details
would depend on the height, if you are raising the ceiling on both sides
and how you insulate the attic.
I have done this in a garage and barn(not in a house that was occupied).
Also TOH 2nd or 3rd season(the Woburn Ranch) had a similar situation.
I might have a copy of the shows at home(2 or 11 repeated it this
summer). They spent part of a couple episodes talking about how to
raise the ceiling and some of the pitfalls. It was actually very
informative, unlike the current TOH.
BOB: This ceiling needs to be raised 2 ft.
NORM: Hi, Bob. We have to do it to meet the codes that they
keep changing. But, it is a job that any homeowner
can do themselves, if they know how.
BOB: Thats nice Norm. While Norm raises the ceiling, lets take
another look at those $5M apartments in the Trump Towers.
[5 minutes later]
BOB: Well, Norm has finished the ceiling and the plasters
where here this mourning. That it for today......
|
12.414 | | MCIS2::DEW | | Thu Dec 29 1988 10:15 | 5 |
| You might just want to pick up to ajustable posts, any lumber yard,
they will take the load and allow you to raise or lower as needed
while you work. It can get to be a problem if something is 1/4 inch
higher then you planned for, forcing it can do more damage then
gently raising it.
|
12.393 | level ceilings | GUNNER::VEDDER | | Thu Dec 29 1988 11:01 | 19 |
| re: finding a true level...
An old carpenter friend showed me a trick he used when installing
suspended cielings in some older homes.
He had a 'contraption' made from an old coffee can and a 20 foot
length of clear plastic hose. The hose was connected to the
bottom of the coffee can. He then filled the can and hose with
water from the kitchen sink. After this, he placed the filled
coffee can on a stepladder which was placed in the center of
the room. Holding the end of the hose he would walk to each
wall and make a mark on the wall when the water in the hose
reached the end of the hose. Since water always seeks its own
level he ended up with all the walls marked at the same level.
From this he would measure "up" to where his final marks would go.
Seemed real simple and worked every time.
Dave Vedder
|
12.415 | | CURIE::BBARRY | | Thu Dec 29 1988 11:58 | 16 |
| Do not jack up the ceiling. You want to keep the ceiling in place,
no higher, no lower. Build a temporary wall. The trick is to make
the studs a little longer then a perfect fit. Then gently pound
them between the top and bottom plates. Alternate leaning to the left
and leaning the studs to the right. This allows for any small
variations in the ceiling or the 2x4.
How many studs to use? If it was my house, about 16" O.C., but
I have seen old carpenters use only 4 over a 12' span, usually longer
at about 60 degree angles.
Another hint: take down the wall plaster and place the beam near
the wall before erecting the temporary walls. (Embarassing story not
included)
Brian
|
12.416 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Thu Dec 29 1988 12:08 | 18 |
| >> Do not jack up the ceiling. You want to keep the ceiling in place,
>> no higher, no lower. Build a temporary wall. The trick is to make
>> the studs a little longer then a perfect fit. Then gently pound
>> them between the top and bottom plates. Alternate leaning to the left
>> and leaning the studs to the right. This allows for any small
>> variations in the ceiling or the 2x4.
I don't understand. By making the studs longer than a perfect
fit and pounding them into place, arent' you in effect raising the
ceiling? It sounds much less controlled (not to mention more damaging)
than gradually jacking it up. The point about removing the sheetrock
and having everything close by before the wall is removed is well
taken.
The adjustable post idea is also a good one. Never even thought about
it. Can these posts be rented?
George
|
12.417 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Thu Dec 29 1988 12:43 | 8 |
| Probably can be rented. They cost somewhere around $15-18 each.
Where are you located because I have 5 at home that are loanable
(from a prev job I did at my last house). I live in Nashua, NH and
work in LKG.
Eric
|
12.418 | | MCIS2::DEW | | Thu Dec 29 1988 12:51 | 4 |
| I do not know about rental, but the cost is under twenty dollars per,
as low as 12.00 on sale, and I have seen them in the Want Ad for
five per, worth the money if your planning any additional projects
later on. I have four and they all seem to be in use for something.
|
12.395 | Color the water | PBA::MARCHETTI | Mama said there'd be days like this. | Thu Dec 29 1988 12:58 | 7 |
| re .6
The water level works great and is easy to make. One tip: put some
red (or whatever color) food coloring in the water. Makes it easier
to see.
Bob
|
12.396 | Water levels - great tools | GWYNED::MCCABE | | Thu Dec 29 1988 13:01 | 10 |
| Ref -2. Water levels have been around a long time, some varities
are 2 clear tubes that screw on the end of a garden hose and allow
you to use as many hoses that you need, self contained units that
hold the resevoir of water and a length of small diameter tubing.
Spags sells my favorite, the Water boss, it has 2 graduated cylinders
at the ends,so that you can take off measurements directly. There is
also an electronic version that beeps when you raise the hose to a
position level with its resevoir. Next best thing to a transit or
dumpy level.
Chris
|
12.419 | Clarification | CURIE::BBARRY | | Thu Dec 29 1988 13:18 | 11 |
| Re: .5
I should have been clearer. You do not pound the studs completely
upright, only pound them until they are snug and at an angle. Since
you can not cut studs to a perfect fit, and there can be slight
variations in the ceiling and floor, it is better to have the studs
too long then too short. If the studs are to short the ceiling can
settle. The advantage of this method is that you can build the
temporary walls out of cheap material(2x4) and the bottom plate will
distribute the load across many joists, not concentrating it like the
jacks do.
|
12.420 | | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Thu Dec 29 1988 15:14 | 10 |
| Ah Ha! Dawn Breaks. I wasn't planning to leave the jacks in place.
I was going to jack up the ceiling, build the temporary walls out
of 2X4's and then remove the jacks letting everything sit on the
temporary walls. Once the beam was in place I would then rejack
up the ceiling, remove the walls and let everything down to rest on the
beam. It seemed that having the walls in place would be more sturdy
than the jacks if the supports had to be left in place for more
than a day or 2. Also, I want to be able to raise the ceiling about
1/8 inch to allow for shrinkage of the beam since it will most likely
be green.
|
12.421 | you don't need jacks | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 29 1988 15:15 | 20 |
| Isn't it amazing how everyone had a different opinion? I guess just to confuse
things I'll toss in mine as well.
What I did a couple of months ago when I removed a 12' section was to cut my
supporting suds about 1/4" *shorter*! Then I sat them on interlocking shingles
which I could tap together, thereby raising the stud. I originally was going
to take a longer stud and pound it into place when my father-in-law said why
work so hard when the shingles will do it all for you. Also, pounding can
crack plaster etc...
One key point though, if you have something like a 2X8 or 2X10 handy, use this
as a plate on the ceiling to better distribute the load and thereby reduce the
chance of cracking whatever is up there.
I guess me general feeling (and apparently other replies as well), is why bother
renting jacks when you really don't need them. For what you'd spend on them
you could buy a pile pf 2X4's and when you're done you'd have the extra material
to do with as you please.
-mark
|
12.422 | I almost forgot | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 29 1988 15:20 | 9 |
| I almost forgot...
Whatever you do, be sure you understand how your ceiling is constructed - is
there strapping onto which the sheetrock (if that's what you have) is nailed?
Be absolutely SURE than you're supporting something solid and not putting the
temporary wall up under thin plaster! You've probably already thought of this
but I thought I'd toss it in just in case.
-mark
|
12.423 | About that ceiling... | CAMLOT::JANIAK | | Thu Dec 29 1988 17:09 | 12 |
| The reference to using shingles is similar to the recommendation
found in one of the Readers Digest DIY books. Another thing I'd
try and do is line up the temporary wall directly under the concealed
strapping (removal of a bearing wall implies joists running
perpendicular, strapping running parellel), and, if possible, the
temporary studs under the ceiling joists.
Now, I've got a naive question: Why get a building permit? Is it
related to the cost of the job (Exceeds some amount?), or the
complexity of the job, (bearing wall modification), or what?
-Stan
|
12.424 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Dec 29 1988 17:39 | 7 |
| Forgive me if I missed this point in the preceding discussion,
but be sure the *floor* you are jacking off of is solid. If
this is in the basement, no problem, but if you're on the first
floor jacking up the first floor ceiling, you probably ought
to put some support posts in the basement directly under where
you plan to put the supporting posts, or walls, or whatever,
on the floor above.
|
12.425 | Building Permit | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Thu Dec 29 1988 20:53 | 15 |
| Thanks for all the suggestions and tips so far. Using the shingles
as shims is certainly easier than trying to cut all the 2X4's to
exact lengths. Of course there's that new Ryobi miter saw that
santa gave me :-).
As far as a building permit goes, the building inspector has
proven to be an invaluable resource. Generally, for non-structural
work I don't bother but since I'm using an exposed wood beam I had a
lot of questions about materials, stress loads, shrinkage, how-to
etc. So far I've taken up about 2 hrs. of his time getting answers.
I suppose I could have hired an architect for a couple of hundred
dollars to do the same thing but for $15 I have a person I can call
on anytime and I have the piece of mind that I'm doing it right.
George
|
12.426 | Replacing a header with a steel beam. | PICV03::CANELLA | | Fri Dec 30 1988 10:38 | 34 |
| I may be paranoid or something but I've always taken out building
permits for the stuff I've done. The reason for this is that insurance
companies have this annoying habit of not wanting to cough up the
money when something goes wrong. In my view, the building inspector's
imprimatur will quickly shut up the insurance representative who
tries to balk at making a payment. Of course, I don't do things
expecting something to go wrong and insurance to bail me out but
it sure provides peace of mind (and of health, too, since my wife
would skin me alive if something went wrong and the insurance co.
refused to pay).
Anyway, I'll be doing something similar to what George will be doing.
I'll be replacing a header which allows the kitchen in the old part
of the house to open up to the family room, which is an addition
to the house. The header has 4 support posts, 2 of which straddle
the kitchen sink. I'm looking to replacing that header with a steel
I beam that will span approximately 15'. The temporary wall will
have the carry the load of the 2nd floor joists (which support the
bathroom upstairs) plus the load of a section of the roof. I'm
planning to set up the temporary wall in the kitchen and will also
set up a temporary support wall in the cellar, directly below the
kitchen's temporary wall. This, I think, should do it while I go
around trying to remove the header and all the stuff surrounding
it and replacing it with the steel beam.
Needless to say, I'll be taking out a permit and will have the bldg.
inspector come in and check out the whole show, including the adequacy
of the size of the beam. I'll be sure to sponge off as much info
as I can from the guy.
If you folks out there have any handy advice that will help me in
this task, I will greatly appreciate it.
ALfonso
|
12.410 | A little more info | SNODOG::CHENETZ | | Tue Jan 03 1989 13:41 | 27 |
| Sorry about not giving enough detail.
The room is about 12' X 10'. It is an addition that was stuck to the
side of the house. Right now it is used as a mudroom/storage with
no heat. I am planing to make it into a livable space by adding heat,
carpeting, etc.
The ceiling will have to be replaced. Part of the ceiling is actually
the soffit of the house (like I said above, an addition that was STUCK
to the side of the house). The other part of the ceiling is sagging
and needs to be replaced anyway. There are no load bearing walls
in the middle of the room. There is no plumbing. All electricity to
the room comes in through the ceiling. The walls in good condition
and have fiberglass insulation in them. I'm not sure about the
structure roof above the ceiling.
I do not intend to touch the outside roof. What I was planning to do
(and I'm sure this is very nieve) after removing the ceiling, was
one by one, remove each joist, cut it and move it up about 6" - 8".
Continue to do this for all the joists. When the ceiling goes in, it
would start at the top of the walls, follow the slope of the roof for
about a foot or so and then finish off, parallel to the floor.
Thanks for the replies so far.
Steve (System) Chenetz
|
12.372 | Check with Local Inspector | OASS::B_RAMSEY | Bruce Ramsey | Thu Jan 12 1989 16:50 | 5 |
| You may need sheetrock underneath the T&G because of fire code reasons.
In Georgia, you have to have a fire proof barrier underneath paneling
and T&G is just paneling (granted Very Nice paneling) and sheetrock is
accepted as fireproof.
|
12.169 | matching a sprayed ceiling? | MENSCH::MOOTREY | | Mon Jan 23 1989 11:16 | 9 |
|
I have a question for those of you who have sprayed a ceiling:
Is it possible to match an exsisting sprayed ceiling? I need to
redo a 4'x8' section of my ceiling and I am hoping to match it in
with the old ceiling. What do you think? Can I get away with this
or am I going to have to redo the whole thing? ( 20'x40' )
|
12.430 | What's a good Ceiling Paint | XCUSME::SUKIEL | | Tue Jan 24 1989 12:14 | 3 |
| Can anyone recommend a good white ceiling paint, that spreads and
covers easily? My ceiling is semmi-rough. Any suggestions would
be appreciated....
|
12.431 | | SA1794::RAYMONDL | | Tue Jan 24 1989 12:30 | 3 |
| SHERWIN WILLIAMS AND PAINT PADS, THATS ALL I HAVE EVER USED.
I MADE A SMALL PLATFORM 24"X24" TO STAND ON TO MAKE IT EASIER.
|
12.432 | | NECVAX::OBRIEN_J | somewhere over the rainbow | Tue Jan 24 1989 13:47 | 5 |
| Ceilings / Muralo Paints - Easy to work with.
Interior / Benjamin Moore
Exterior / California Paints
|
12.433 | Buy the best you can find! | WORDS::DUKE | | Wed Jan 25 1989 11:35 | 9 |
| I agree with .2 All are good quality paints.
I like California Ceiling White.
I learned the hard way to buy the best paint you can find. It is
cheaper in the long run.
Peter Duke
|
12.434 | Vapor Barrier Paint | CARTUN::DERAMO | | Wed Jan 25 1989 13:03 | 10 |
| You might also consider that some paints can serve as vapor barriers.
I believe that the Benjamin Moore Alkyd White is in this category.
Other alkyd paints (as compared to Latex-based paints) may also
create a vapor barrier.
This would be a consideration if you were painting a ceiling just
below an unheated, uninsulated attic, or if the attic insulation
did not have a vapor barrier.
|
12.435 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Jan 25 1989 14:09 | 4 |
| re .4
Glidden makes a vapor barrier paint. I've never used it, so I can't
vouch for the quality. I've seen in at Grossman's and PF O'Conner.
|
12.436 | Ceiling painting is a pain in the neck | AKOV75::LAVIN | | Wed Jan 25 1989 17:25 | 13 |
|
I use Sears Best (scary huh ?) and have had great luck !
I also used the "Wagner paint tube" rollers. These are rollers on the
end of large tubes. You pull back on a plunger to suck up paint into
the roller about 1/2 quart at a time. To operate, you press the plunger
forward as you paint, feeding paint to the roller. Sort of a manually
operated power roller. Gives you about 3' of handle also - good for
ceiling work.
Saves A LOT of time reloading the roller. Comes complete with
anti-spray shield for about $ 18. Get a longer nap (Wagner) roller
cover if the ceiling is very rough.
|
12.437 | Pratt and Lambert | TALLIS::WEISS | | Wed Jan 25 1989 18:30 | 14 |
|
I highly recommend Pratt & Lambert. They make a special ceiling
paint which is VERY splatter free. My grandfather-in-law was a
professional painter for a 'long' time and used nothing but P&L.
We also have textured ceilings and have had good luck applying the
paint with a 3/8" nap roller, I'm sure your success will depend on the
'roughness' on your ceiling. I don't think a paint pad would do
a good job on a textured/rough surface. Pads work fine when running
along a groove, but cross a sharp bump and the paint will glob (does
that make sense?). If you do use a roller, be sure to buy an
extension handle, it'll make it much easier for you.
|
12.438 | P&L is the way to go | TARKIN::HARTWELL | Dave Hartwell | Fri Jan 27 1989 13:53 | 6 |
| I agree with .7..... Use pratt and Lambert. It cost $$$ but it's
the best paint I've used to date.
Dave
|
12.439 | Moisture concern? | WEFXEM::COTE | Volume Support Specs. make it loud? | Mon Jan 30 1989 08:24 | 5 |
| Do I need to take anything special into consideration when painting
the ceiling above my tub/shower due to the humidity? The ceiling
is 1/2" greenboard...
Edd
|
12.15 | | HPSTEK::JMONTAGNA | | Mon Jan 30 1989 14:22 | 6 |
|
I just had somebody give me quote of plastering a cathedral ceiling
using blue board with a low stucco finish for $1500 the room dimension
are 14x14 this seems to be too high has anybody had any ceilings
done lately?
|
12.16 | I Like This Price | BAGELS::MONDOU | | Mon Jan 30 1989 15:29 | 15 |
| I just received the following quote:
1. Install blueboard on all walls and semi-cathedral ceiling.
Room size is 14' by 17'. Lots of windows, etc.
2. Plaster ceiling ( rough coat) and walls ( smooth coat)
3. Completely refinish ceilings in two bathrooms.
Total Price $ 850.00
I live in Milford, Mass. Contact me by mail if you want
any further info.
Sorry, I didn't ask for seperate prices.
|
12.440 | It'll last longer. | USEM::CALCAGNI | A.F.F.A. | Thu Feb 02 1989 14:04 | 8 |
|
-1
Use a exterior paint for the ceiling. It'll hold up much better
in a area such as the bathroom that has a lot of moisture.
Cal.
|
12.459 | Staging for painting stairway ceiling | FRAGLE::STUART | it was a terrible vaxident | Thu Feb 09 1989 13:27 | 18 |
|
I looked in 1111 but found nothing on this. I weely did!
shortly I will be painting the walls and ceiling in the
stairway to the 2nd floor. I have 8ft ceilings so it is
approx. 12ft from the middle step to the ceiling.
I'd like to hear some ideas for makeshift staging that will
allow me to reach the ceiling and the top parts of the
walls.
I have a 4ft and a 5ft step ladder and an 18ft extension
ladder ...
ace (who's not to crazy about high places)
|
12.460 | the makeshift way | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Thu Feb 09 1989 13:41 | 8 |
| I taped a paint brush onto a broom handle when I had to do this one -
it isn't much fun (except for my cats - they thouoght it was a riot,
for some reason!). You can buy rollers with very long extendible
handles, but they are hard to control. At least I was painting the
ceiling the same color as it already was (white, of course), so a less
than perfect job wasn't real obvious. I didn't need to paint the
walls, except in one little area that had a water stain, but I could
reach it all from the steps.
|
12.461 | Try your extension ladder | AKOV13::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Thu Feb 09 1989 14:15 | 14 |
| I took my extension ladder and leaned it from the steps against
the wall (the one you see when you are walking down the stairs).
This allowed me to climb the ladder and do the trim. Then I was
able to run a plank from the steps to the step of the ladder. This
allowed me to reach the wall and ceiling without too much trouble.
The only difficulty I had was painting the spot where the ladder
was. For this I had to move the ladder. I tried to lower the ladder
enough that I could reach the area above it. Here I was careful
around the walls and ceiling. Then with the ladder removed, I used
a broom handle on the roller and did the rest of the area.
Ed
|
12.462 | step ladder and planking | OASS::B_RAMSEY | Bruce Ramsey | Thu Feb 09 1989 14:23 | 20 |
|
One way is too put a step ladder at the base of the stairs. Slide
planking between the rungs of the ladder and match it to a step
in the stairs. The goal is to have a level plank.
attempt at picture to follow
+---+
/\ |
/ \ +---+
/ \ |
=/======\=========+===+ <---Plank
/ \ |
/ \ +---+
/ \ |
As an alternative, you can use the extension ladder as the plank.
Not as safe because you can step thru the ladder and some ladders
can NOT stand that kind of pressure on that direction of the ladder.
|
12.463 | Same Thought Kinda | OASS::B_RAMSEY | Bruce Ramsey | Thu Feb 09 1989 14:39 | 19 |
| Here is a little different angle on the same thought.
Put a part of the extenstion ladder on the stairs and rest it against
the back wall of the upper stairway. Slide a plank between the
ladder and the stairs resting on top of a matching height step.
Attempt at picture to follow:
|
Back Wall |
Stair well |\
-------+ \ +-------- <---Second Story Landing
\ |
==\=======+===+ <---Plank
\ |
Extentsion ------> \ +---+
Ladder \|
+---+
| <---Stairs
+---+
|
12.464 | Pad the ladder | OASS::B_RAMSEY | Bruce Ramsey | Thu Feb 09 1989 14:43 | 2 |
| I forgot to add be sure and put padding on the the end of the extension
ladder so that you do not mar/scatch the wall.
|
12.465 | .2 and .4 are correct | DRUID::CHACE | winter's coming, so let's enjoy it! | Thu Feb 09 1989 15:36 | 3 |
|
.2 and .4 are they easiest and best way to do it.
|
12.466 | Dont raise the bridge, lower the river | VMSSPT::NICHOLS | Herb - CSSE VMS SUPPORT at ZK | Thu Feb 09 1989 15:47 | 2 |
| Paint the ceiling the same color as the wall and use a four foot broom
stick as the roller handle. It was easy.
|
12.467 | A bang-up alternative | PRGMUM::FRIDAY | Patience averts the severe decree | Thu Feb 09 1989 16:28 | 4 |
| - Attach can of paint to end of a stick long enough to
reach the ceiling.
- Ignite a cherry bomb and drop it into the can.
- QUICKLY lift into place and close your eyes.
|
12.468 | Easy pad hint | HPSTEK::EKOKERNAK | | Thu Feb 09 1989 16:29 | 6 |
| Re: .5
Pad the ladder by putting a pair of old socks on it. In a pinch
you can also use it to wipe your hands.
|
12.469 | supporting man Friday | BTO::CHARBONNEA_G | | Thu Feb 09 1989 22:02 | 9 |
| I`m new to this note file and I think 2995.8 haves you on the
way it should be done.....GOOD GOING MAN FRIDAY..............
The way is get someone else to do that part of the house.....
|
12.470 | (ladder + ladder) + plank = X | FRAGLE::STUART | it was a terrible vaxident | Fri Feb 10 1989 08:58 | 10 |
|
Thanks for all your replies (even .8 but my 9 year old already had
a similar one).
The one that solves my problem is to put a step ladder on the 2nd
floor landing and the extension ladder against the wall and a
plank between them. Now I just have to find some planks.
ace
|
12.471 | Re planks | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Fri Feb 10 1989 09:22 | 7 |
| Official staging planks, as used by the pros, are a special high grade
of lumber. They look beat up because they're used outdoors and get
things spilled and dropped on them, but underneath they're free of
knots and cracks. They're fairly expensive (and HEAVY), but well worth
it when you're betting your life on them.
I have one (~12'?) in Maynard that you're welcome to borrow.
|
12.472 | the right tool | LEVERS::S_JACOBS | Live Free and Prosper | Fri Feb 10 1989 13:22 | 37 |
| I used a nifty ladder that works as an extension ladder, step ladder,
or un-even surface ladder...
\ /_____ hinged
/\ \
/ \
/ \ |\
/ \ \ - slides up and down
/ \ \|
and it fit on the stairs real nicely for stairwell painting...
\
\
\ stand
\ here
\
/\
/ \
/ \
/ ___|
/ |
/ ___|
/ |
/ ___|
/ |
___|
|
___|
It cost about $80 or $90 as I remember, but it was worth it.
Steve
|
12.473 | Cut off a stepladder | HANNAH::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Mon Feb 13 1989 18:40 | 19 |
| I just re-painted my stairwell, too. The walls and ceiling were a different
color, so getting a straight line was important. Of course, I had to strip off
two layers of wallpaper, clean and patch the walls first!
I think the maximum reach I needed was about 9ft since the ceiling
follows the slope of the roof (this is a Cape). Since it would take
many passes for this, I bought a $4 2ft wood stepladder and sawed off
the two back legs exactly one stair height. This made a good, solid step
with enough reach to get everywhere.
When I painted, I painted the ceiling first, then taped the ceiling with
that "painting tape" (it's kraft paper with 1/2 of one side with the
3M "Post-It" glue). Since I was at the end of my reach (and vision) the
tape was essential.
If you need more reach, you can get a 4ft wood stepladder and saw off
2 or three steps worth. Or even a 6ft, but then the cost may get hard to
justify, since it will only be good on steps!
--tom
|
12.474 | No fun no matter how you manage it | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Tue Feb 14 1989 12:59 | 10 |
| I recall my father doing this job using an old wooden extension ladder,
which he fed through the opening to the attic, which happened to be
above the stairs, from the hallway at the top - making a slanting but
stable painting platform - I didn't have this option since the pulldown
to my attic is in the hallway rather than over the steps (which is a
pretty silly place for it to be, but Dad didn't construct it there, it
already was).
This isn't a fun job, no matter how you do it, but it is a lot easier
if the walls and ceiling are the same color like mine.
|
12.475 | I'll do it next weekend dear ! | FRAGLE::STUART | it was a terrible vaxident | Tue Feb 14 1989 14:07 | 18 |
|
gee thanks for all the encouragment !
I keep looking at the task at hand and it looks like such an
awesome one! As I stated I have 8' ceilings and the house is
a Garrison Saltbox so the stairwell wall goes straight up to
meet the ceiling (no slant). I have to paint both the walls
and the textured ceiling(different colors). I don't have an
attic opening there either.
Another thought I had was to spike a double 2 X 4 to the wall
you would face going down the stairs level with the 2nd floor
landing and lay planks across there, this would extend the floor
right across and being 6'3" I can reach everything !
then just patch where the board was.
ace
|
12.476 | Why add work? | AKOV13::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Tue Feb 14 1989 14:43 | 10 |
| re .16
But why damage your walls? If you have plaster, you could end up
cracking the plaster and really have a mess. The staging that has
been described throughout here (in various cuts and colors) will
work just fine and you will not have any additional patching to
do.
Ed..
|
12.477 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Feb 14 1989 19:44 | 23 |
| well I guess I might as well chime in...
I have an arrangement identical to what you're describing and I've managed to
reach the ceiling with an ordinary stepladder. What I did was put some blocks
on the one stair tread at the location of the ladder and raise it up around
9". Then I simply leaned the ladder against the stair well and stood on the top
step.
*WARNING*
I wouldn't recommend this unless your around 6 feet tall AND don't get
nervious standing in a very precarious situation. Bending down to
refill your brush can also be a real pain. Fortunately, you only
really need to stand on the top run for around 5-10 minutes.
As for cutting legs off a stepladder, DON'T! This is a neat idea, but why not
simply take a couple of huncks of 2X4 and clamp one to each side of the ladder
with C-Clamps.
If all else fails, just buy an 8 foot stepladder (or better yet, rent one for
a couple of hours!).
-mark
|
12.478 | ladders | MCIS2::DEW | | Wed Feb 15 1989 17:01 | 3 |
| The latters mentioned in by 2995.13 are available at SPAGS, I have
two, 6 foot and 8 foot. they will do about anything you ask. Well
worth looking at if you are close.
|
12.479 | Moved by moderator | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Thu Feb 16 1989 18:48 | 25 |
| <<< JOET::DUA1:[000000.NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Better living through DIY >-
================================================================================
Note 3018.0 Drop ceiling in stairwell to make painting easier No replies
BTO::CHARBONNEA_G 18 lines 14-FEB-1989 17:12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the hard time person in 2995.......
Why not rebuild the stairwell with a slant so if you got to do this
again it won`t be that hard a job?
You could use a few 2x4`s and some ceiling tiles the color you want.
I for one don`t like painting let alone doing it the way and I think
of if I got to do this again later.
A slanted ceiling looks more like the 1980`s,or do you want the
old look.
If your walls have place were the ceiling joints to the ceiling
down stairs,build a shelf for small things and for you to place
a plank for the future.
If you have the shelf right you can put up a floor across it fast
so you can work from it with a small ladder and take it down at
well.
Use your extention ladder from shelf to stairs with 2x6`s---good
and strong.
|
12.316 | spotty ceiling | ATEAM::COVIELLO | | Tue Apr 11 1989 11:42 | 9 |
| I am doing a kitchen ceiling over and I had to scrape and sand
down the old paint to be somewhat uniform well the old paint is
a litlle bit darker than the plaster and it looks like hell after
2 coats. somebody my grandfather knows said to use spackle, now
I never heard of this but I'll try anything once. does spackle come
in powder and can you mix it so it is very thin and roll it on.
any others suggestions welcome.
paul
|
12.317 | | VMSSG::NICHOLS | Herb - CSSE VMS SUPPORT at ZK | Tue Apr 11 1989 13:18 | 1 |
| yes spackle comes either pre-mixed or in powder.
|
12.318 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Tue Apr 11 1989 13:26 | 15 |
| re: .6, .7
But it doesn't sound to me that spackling is the solution to this
problem. Spackling is normally done to fill holes, not to skim coat an
entire ceiling. As far as I know, any spackle you get in powder form
is going to be old technology, and will suffer from shrinking and
cracking over an area that large. The premixed stuff would be too
expensive to use on that large an area. I would guess that joint
compound would be better for that purpose.
Wouldn't a good solid primer or base paint really be the correct
solution? You may need to go with a better quality paint -- something
guaranteed to hide what's underneath.
Gary
|
12.319 | but what about the oceans or continents | ATEAM::COVIELLO | | Tue Apr 11 1989 13:41 | 6 |
| I can live with the primer but what do I do with the large and small
areas that have been scraped away the ceiling right now looks like
a map. I just thought that if the spackle was thin enough I could
just brush it on.
paul
|
12.320 | texture paint ? | AKOV68::LAVIN | Oh, It's a profit deal | Tue Apr 11 1989 14:17 | 3 |
| You could use something like texture paint to get a uniformly rough
finish on the whole ceiling. It may or may not stick well
to your new paint: you'd proably have to try it out.
|
12.321 | no thank you | ATEAM::COVIELLO | | Tue Apr 11 1989 14:52 | 6 |
| it is in a kitchen and I do not wanty a texture ceiling. talk about
making somebodies life miserable, your looking at painting it at
least once a year. I'll try to skim coat it with something.
thanks
paul
|
12.322 | Remove old paint with heat gun | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Tue Apr 11 1989 15:05 | 11 |
| I just helped some friends redo their bathroom. They had similar
problems with their ceiling. One friend in the group, who is a
carpenter by trade, said they were plaster ceilings, and had he
tried a heat gun? They hadn't, but did. The heat gun got some
old gooey stuff off (is that paint?), and they got back down to
the plaster and started fresh.
Perhaps you have the same situation?
Elaine
|
12.323 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Tue Apr 11 1989 15:52 | 2 |
|
Did you try sanding it?
|
12.324 | that's an idea | ATEAM::COVIELLO | | Tue Apr 11 1989 16:35 | 4 |
| The heat gun idea might work. sanding hardly made a dent. I think
I will try that this weekend. The paint has been up there for at
least 20 years and probably oil based or alkyd, There is no horse
hair plaster underneath. thanks paul
|
12.325 | Color problem, or texture problem? | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Tue Apr 11 1989 17:12 | 11 |
| My impression from .6 was that your only problem is a difference in
color - something about the old, un-scraped paint being a different
color from the spots where scraping exposed the plaster, and that
difference was showing through two coats of paint.
If that's the case, then the right fix is primer, better-quality paint,
and/or more coats of paint. Paint should be able to cover color
differences, and if yours can't, get different paint.
Spackling, skim-coating, heat gun work, and more scraping are only
appropriate for various types of problems with texture.
|
12.326 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Tue Apr 11 1989 17:47 | 4 |
|
Sanding hardly made a dent? What grit were you using? Did you
try a palm sander or doing it by hand?
|
12.327 | What's really on the ceiling? | GOLD::ROLLER | Ken Roller | Wed Apr 12 1989 13:29 | 15 |
| I just reread the base note, and I have a question. Our house is
30 years old, and when I went to paint the ceilings, I found out
that the original "paint" was not paint at all, but a process to
make the skim coat look like paint. It's called Calcimne (?), and
if there is a layer of paint on top of it, that layer will stick
for a while, but will eventually peel. If you try to paint over
the first coat, your paint and the first coat will peel right off.
So is your ceiling treated like this? If it is, then if you or
anyone else have put paint over it then you have to scrape. :-(
Otherwise you can mix up a STRONG HOT batch of TSP, and wash it
off. It's not fun work, but it will come off and the next coat
of paint will stick. I just finished a bedroom like this, and it
turned out good. I did put a primer on the ceiling before the paint.
Ken (Three rooms down and only 5 to go.... :-( :-( :-(
|
12.328 | an easier way | CASV01::DUNN | | Wed Apr 12 1989 14:21 | 11 |
|
We used Muralo's "Calcimine Cover" ceiling paint. It is an oil
based paint. Went right over the calcimine, is a nice white, and has
not budged for 2 years.
Smells like an oil based paint, but beats scrubbing the ceiling by a
long shot.
|
12.329 | DON'T paint over calcimine, someone will regret it | CSMET2::CHACE | let's go fishin' | Tue Apr 18 1989 13:38 | 15 |
|
Painting over Calcimine may be easier in the short run, but the
paint that is put on over the calcimine is ONLY stuck to the calcimine.
If the ceiling EVER gets wet, for more than a VERY short time -
this year, next year, or 20 years from now, the calcimine will
dissolve. Since the paint is ON the calcimine, and the calicimine
is dissolved, the paint will peel - and in VERY big pieces. In fact,
a good way to strip a ceiling that has calcimine which is painted
over, is to apply wallpaper paste to the ceiling. The paste holds
the moisture on the ceiling for a longer period of time than plan
water. The calcimine under the paint softens, and the paint bubbles
off! I have seen paint over calcimine peel from just quickly WASHING
the ceiling!
Kenny
|
12.330 | it worked | ATEAM::COVIELLO | | Tue Apr 18 1989 15:19 | 6 |
| just to let everybody know I picked up spackling powder mixed rather
thin an applied it by brushing along all the edges of the old paint.
then sanded it smooth worked great applied a coat of primer and
a fresh coat of paint looks great, it can be done
paul
|
12.130 | can it be 'STRIPPED??'
| AITG::KARR | | Fri Apr 28 1989 12:16 | 15 |
|
I have the same problem (as note 553) in my Kitchen. The house was built in 1940
everything is plastered. The ceiling is peeling quite badly and I have feathered
the areas that seem to be adhereing but after painting, areas that have not
begun to peel, start. I am planning on blasting out an outside wall in a few
years (at which time I will want a 'tin cieling') so I do not want to install
a new ceiling now.
My question then is; Can the paint be stripped off the ceiling down to the
plaster? I would then seal ther plaster and paint. (my guess is that there are
5-7 coats of paint on the ceiling. The plaster (under the paint) is in excellent
condition. Please, if anyone out there has another solution or answer other than
ceiling replacement, I'm anxious to hear from you.
DIY'r
Roger
|
12.480 | Skim-coat ceiling nicked while removing calcimine? | AITG::KARR | | Tue May 16 1989 10:52 | 23 |
|
First up, I'd like to comment on how usefull this notes file was
regarding my plastered ceiling in my kitchen. As a result, I'm back
for more! (I have cancelled my subscription to handyman
magazine as a result of this conference)
I have searched the notes file using the keywords ceiling and plaster
and have not been able to find the answer to this question.
I have steamed the calcimine off my ceiling and now am at the plaster.
In the process of stripping the calcimine with a 4" razor blade, I
have lots of nicks in the plaster. What I would like to know is, with
the ceiling properly washed and prepared, CAN I SKIM COAT THE CEILING?
If I can, this would save me lots of time as the other alternative
would be to attack it with a wide blade and joint compound.
Also,
Where do I find the contractors reference notes? I have searched with
no luck. I need a good plasterer and electrician. (I'm juggling
all kind of projects here!) tis the season isn't it?
thanks alot!
Roger
|
12.481 | no need to skim | TLE::THORSTENSEN | | Tue May 16 1989 13:09 | 11 |
| I've done an *awful lot* of old ceilings and plaster and find
that you don't need to skim the plaster. It's much easier to
patch with a putty knife or, if there are so many nicks that you
think you'd go nuts, do two thin coats with a squeegy (sp?). If
you need to, wipe with water later.
I once had an 18th Centruy wall that had been used as a dart board
and this worked great. After two years, you still couldn't see a trace
of the dart damage. (I used wallboard compound, but other stuff might
work, too.) The squeegy lets you cover a pretty large area and even
out cracks, general bulges, etc.
|
12.482 | | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, & Holly; in Calif. | Tue May 16 1989 17:43 | 10 |
| I have a ceiling that I'd like to try this on. But all my previous
patching work has just been with a putty knife. If I use "wallboard
compound" and a squuegy (the rubber bladed thing I have for my car
windows?????), is there anything I should know? How do you keep from
getting lines at the end of the squeegy? How thick should the coat
be? (The problem with the ceiling is that it is slightly uneven all
over, due to the house settling over time I guess. I patched the cracks
with spackle a couple of years ago and it hasn't recracked, but the
patches show and I'd liek a smooth finish.)
|
12.483 | Steaming off calcimine? | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed May 17 1989 10:06 | 7 |
| re .0:
> I have steamed the calcimine off my ceiling and now am at the plaster.
How did you do this (I don't think any of the calcimine notes mention
steaming)? Just a wallpaper steamer and a scraper? How fast is it?
I've tried a solution of Spic and Span, and found it very frustrating,
even when I used saturated paper towels taped to the ceiling.
|
12.484 | think its easy?? | AITG::KARR | | Thu May 18 1989 11:48 | 14 |
| RE .3
I steamed the calcimine off with a walpaper steamer with a large mit.
It takes about 45 seconds for the steam to loosen up the calcimine
before you scrape it. (I was also going therough several coats of paint
so in some spots you would have to go over it twice. You need to use
a 4 inch razor blade scraper (its called a wallpaper scraper in the
stores.. made by HYDE) It will probably go much quicker than the washing
method. I did a 14 X 22 ceiling in about 8 hours. you should have at
least 2 people (one scraping the other steaming) 3 would be great
so you can switch off taking a break. Its real hard labor!
good luck
Roger
|
12.485 | | TLE::THORSTENSEN | | Thu May 18 1989 13:11 | 23 |
| I've used very hot water and DIRT-EX to remove calcimine. You have to
keep the water hot and rinse several times. A drop cloth on the floor
let's you slog it on, which is what you need to do. If you don't get it
*all* off, paint or even skimmed on wallboard compound will come off.
Not very pleasant stuff.
Anyway, I use a putty knife to glob wallboard compound onto the
squeegy. I lay on about 1/2" the length of the squeegy, but leave the
last 1" or so free of mud. That seems to give me fewer seams, so
there's
less washing up to do later. My squeegy is about 15" wide and I use a
smaller one for tight places.
The technique works well if you're doing large-ish areas, but it
doesn't work really well if the entire wall or ceiling is sagging
and cracked. If you thought of using the squeegy as a way to really
skim coat the plaster, you've got the wrong tool.
And, yes, by squeegy I mean the kind with the rubber blade that's
used to clean windows. But unlike cleaning windows, you don't want
to apply lots of pressure. Use enough pressure to float the compount
into the cracks, but not so much as to have the rubber dip into the
cracks and scoop out the compound on a second wipe.
|
12.486 | | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, & Holly; in Calif. | Thu May 18 1989 15:24 | 6 |
| What do I do to skim coat the entire ceiling? It's not sagging, and
the cracks seems to be "permenantly" filled by the spackling I did
a few years ago, but the surface is somewhat uneven. It seems to be
very stable, so all I need is to level it. I take it I put a thin
layer of wallboard compound on with what, one of those giant putty knives?
|
12.487 | It worked for me... | ULTRA::BUTCHART | | Thu May 18 1989 15:53 | 10 |
| re .6:
I tried that a while back and it worked pretty good. Picked up one
of those really wide (almost a foot) flexible spreading knives and a
bunch of wallboard compound. Raised up the dips till it all looked
smooth to eyeball, then did a bit of touchup sanding once it dried.
Came out looking pretty nice. You have to work the compound a good
bit to get all the air bubbles out though.
/Dave
|
12.488 | Removing screw anchors from plaster ceiling? | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, & Holly; in Calif. | Mon May 22 1989 17:32 | 11 |
| There are a couple of "fasteners" protruding slightly from a hallway
ceiling in my house. There used to be a smoke detector there, and it
was held in place by screws that went into these fasteners. Now
that I've moved the detector, how do I get the fasteners out? They
are small but very noticeable cylinders not much bigger than the diameter
of the screws. They protrude about a 1/4 inch down from the ceiling.
I am assuming they are some sort of gizmo that expands behind the
ceiling surface once it's installed, so I hesitate to resort to more
brute force lest I bring down several square inches of plaster with
the fasteners. They protrude too far to just spackle over them.
|
12.489 | Two suggestions, probably not much help | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Mon May 22 1989 17:38 | 3 |
| 1. Put the smoke detector back up there.
2. Paint the cylinders the same color as the ceiling and forget them.
|
12.490 | pound in ,then cover up | BOMBE::CARLSON | Dave Carlson | Mon May 22 1989 17:55 | 4 |
| re.0 lightly hammer the fasteners that protrude into the ceiling and
then spackle over them.
Dave Carlson
|
12.491 | | JULIET::MILLER_PA | Strike THREE! You're outta there | Mon May 22 1989 20:45 | 7 |
| re - 1
I was thinking on the same lines, but file/sand down the ends of
the fasteners and then spackle over them, or drive them totally
through the sheetrock and repair the small holes they will leave.
I still like the responce by -2 who said to replace the smoke alarms.
|
12.492 | | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, & Holly; in Calif. | Mon May 22 1989 21:17 | 2 |
| The alarm has been moved to a better place.
|
12.493 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue May 23 1989 09:35 | 5 |
| > The alarm has been moved to a better place.
So put up a fake one. An alarm looks like it's SUPPOSED to be there. :^)
Paul
|
12.494 | FILE or DRILL....then FILL | CECV01::SELIG | | Tue May 23 1989 10:05 | 11 |
| Sounds like these are plastic screw anchors in which case you can
either file the heads off as suggested in an earlier response or
use a drill that is about the same diameter as the protruding anchor
head. Just drill the head off (same as filing) and then knock the
anchor inward until it falls inside your ceiling. The remaining
hole is likely to be about a 3/16 - 1/4" which can easily be filled
in SEVERAL applications of spackle. The first application will likely
get sucked in a little during drying. If the ceiling is textured,
you can blend the spackling by taking a small paint brush, wet the
tip and "dab" the wet spackle patch gently with the brush tip. This
will texture the patch.
|
12.495 | Cut them off - Push them in! | CSMET2::CHACE | let's go fishin' | Tue May 23 1989 10:08 | 9 |
|
They're probably plastic; so just cut the tops off with a razor
scraper and the rest will then push into the ceiling. Then you can
spackle and paint just like any other hole.
I *used* to hammer them in, but it can easily cause more damage
in the area - I wouldn't do that.
Kenny
|
12.496 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Tue May 23 1989 12:03 | 6 |
| re: .6
The latest in spackling compounds don't shrink. One dab of spackling
should work just fine.
Gary
|
12.497 | Leave'em and hang christmas orniments in december | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Tue May 23 1989 14:23 | 24 |
|
So to re-cap. Drill them as .6 points out, and then spackle them
with NON-SHRINKING spackle. Then blend it in as .6 points out.
Sounds great !
Disclaimer :
You might have to paint the ceiling. If the ceiling is dirtier
than the spackle you may have spots that stand out.
Now were still not sure here if the anchors are metal or plastic.
Most likly plastic because they protrude like all good plastic anchors
do. For those in the future that have to deal with metal anchors.
You have a few choices also, spackle over them and blend as in .6,
or tighten the screw till the anchor heads are pulled in a below
the surface of the sheat rock where the can be totaly covered with
spackle.
One last thought, most of the plastic anchors I've worked with
can be pulled back out with a pair of pliers and just turning them
out gently, then they can be filled and spackled and painted to
match.
|
12.498 | Try a Teabag | SALEM::VINCENT | | Tue May 23 1989 15:58 | 8 |
| If the spot needs to be color blended afterwards try dabbing it
with a wet teabag after the spackle is dry, go easy, the tea works
quickly. This worked well after I touched up a cople of holes in
a textured ceiling, my wife couldn't find them and when they finally
were painted they did not show any bleed thru of the tea stain.
TPV
|
12.499 | Just pull the thing out | EPOCH::JOHNSON | Rule #6: There is no rule #6. | Tue May 23 1989 17:58 | 10 |
| I've said this before, and I'll say it again...
If these are the 'standard' plastic anchors, just screw a screw slightly into
them (just enough to not pull out, and if it does pull out, screw it in another
turn) and pull. With less effort than it'll take to damage the ceiling, the
anchor will pull out in one piece.
This method has *never* failed me.
Pete
|
12.500 | | CIRCUS::KOLLING | Karen, Sweetie, & Holly; in Calif. | Tue May 23 1989 20:07 | 5 |
| Re: .11
This is a lath and plaster ceiling. Have you tried the just pull
method on one of those?
|
12.501 | Lots of great ideas, go for it ! | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Wed May 24 1989 13:35 | 7 |
|
Lath ??? Lots of thin stips of wood that has the plaster applied
to them. Is this horsehair plater ? How old is this house ? 50+
Any event sounds like lots of great ideas, drill, sand, pull, twist,
hammer. Sounds like we've just about beaten this to death. Which
method do you like? and let us know how it turns out.
|
12.502 | | EPOCH::JOHNSON | Rule #6: There is no rule #6. | Wed May 24 1989 15:23 | 5 |
| In answer to note 3258.12, yes. I had a 150-year-old house with horsehair
plaster throughout and many of these things in use (not by me, I don't think
they work well in that situation). As a matter of fact, I think taking them
out using the 'pull' method was easier then than it is now that I'm in a
30-year-old house.
|
12.503 | Is this the item? | BOSHOG::HAUENSTEIN | Use WALDRF::HAUENSTEIN for mail | Fri May 26 1989 10:57 | 14 |
| Are we talking about items that look like this?
<====\ /====> < Anchor behind the wall
============| |============= < Wall
-- -- < Plastic 'Plate'
^
|----------------< Screw goes in here
My interest is that I have 50 to 70 of them sprinkled liberally to hold
a previous owners desk/shelving combination. I certainly want the easiest
method of removing them. My walls are conventional wallboard.
Lee
|
12.504 | "drill sargent" | JULIET::MILLER_PA | Strike THREE! You're outta there | Fri May 26 1989 11:18 | 8 |
| If they are plastic, take a drill bit and drill them out and then
spackle the holes, and repaint. You will have many holes to do
and it may take a couple of hours to finish, but you will have a
nice, clean, "smooth" wall.
Have fun...
Pat
|
12.505 | You can drive unwanted M-bolts into the wall cavity | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck - DECnet-VAX | Fri May 26 1989 12:48 | 6 |
| re .15
What I've done in the past with molly bolts is carefully scribe around
the outside of them with an Exacto knife, then drive the bolt *into* to
wall cavity, rather than trying to pull it (expanded anchor ribs and
all) back out. Makes for a smaller hole to spackle.
|
12.506 | | BOSHOG::HAUENSTEIN | Use WALDRF::HAUENSTEIN for mail | Fri May 26 1989 13:03 | 13 |
| A slight digression, on acquiring these plastic anchors.
I would like to find a supply of the plastic anchors, OTHER THAN
the stores (Sears, most hardware stores) where they are packaged
12 to a box, or somesuch small quantity. No store seems to know
where I could get these in quantities of say 100, 250. Do any of
you know of a way to order them in quantity? I live in Nashua
by the way.
This note has some good ideas on removing the anchors. I may try
several.
Thanks - Lee
|
12.507 | 2 year old with a hammer | GYPSY::GOETZ | | Fri May 26 1989 13:13 | 14 |
| Lee,
We have overlooked one of the simplest methods available to you
for the removal of the anchors. You have a 2-year old, give her
a hammer and tell her to have at it...I'm sure your wife won't mind.
Lotsa 8^)
Will Builders Square give you a break on a quantity of these things?
See you tomorrow ??
Al
|
12.508 | Somerville Lumber | EPOCH::JOHNSON | Rule #6: There is no rule #6. | Tue May 30 1989 08:20 | 6 |
| re: .18
I have boxes of at least 50 (anchors and screws included) that are available at
Somerville Lumber (at least they were when I bought them).
Pete
|
12.509 | and now for the easiest way... | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Jun 01 1989 20:52 | 10 |
| This was discussed several years ago and I'm surprised nobody put in the real
answer. What it looks like when is place is a washer sitting over a hole,
right? All you do is carfully pry up an edge of the washer enough to grab it
with some pliers and it will easily break off (I've gotta believe it's by
design since it's so easy). Now you simply push what's left into the wall and
proceed with your favorite spackle.
As I said before, this is the ONLY way to go...
-mark
|
12.78 | ceiling materials for porch? | NATASH::WEIGL | | Wed Jun 28 1989 11:23 | 13 |
|
Opening up a long-dormant note here, but I have a question about
ceiling materials for a screened-in porch.
I'm planning to put a shed roof over a PT deck. It will come out 10'
over the deck from the house, and the question is - what to cover the
roof joists with for finishing?
I've seen tongue-in-groove pine ($$$), and have heard suggestions for
aspenite and T-111. We're after something simple as a finished
product.
Can anyone suggest other sheet products which might be appropriate?
|
12.79 | Some BC plywood at $12 a sheet | WJO::MARCHETTI | Mama said there'd be days like this. | Wed Jun 28 1989 15:29 | 5 |
| Mine has a plywood ceiling (I assume exterior grade) that has been
painted. It looks fine, although certainly not fancy. We don't spend
too much time looking up when we're out on the porch. 8-)
Bob
|
12.80 | luan | DEMING::TADRY | | Thu Jun 29 1989 13:13 | 2 |
| I used 1/4" luan and painted it. I would also suggest running firring
strips to ensure that the ceiling will be level.
|
12.81 | I'd recommend lattice | NECVAX::MILLER_C | Chuck - Don't Worry, be HOPpy! | Thu Jun 29 1989 13:59 | 14 |
| I installed an new roof and ceiling on my porch two summers ago.
The original porch has a homosote ceiling, which I hated. I replaced
it with latticework. Before you install it, I would recommend painting
the inside of the roof a dark color so the ceiling joists "disappear"
behind the latticework. I painted the lattice parchment to match
my window trim. I also wired up the ceiling with outlets and installed
an inexpensive ceiling fan before I enclosed the ceiling with the
lattice work. The lattice ceiling gives the porch an airy feeling
and the fan helps keep the roof from holding in an heat.
This was one of the better ideas I've had for my porch and we've
been most happy with the results.
Chuck
|
12.82 | | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Thu Jun 29 1989 14:39 | 6 |
| You guys sure like complicated solutions.
Use 5/8" T1/11 as roof sheathing - apply with the groove (good)
side down. You now have sheathing and a nice looking visible-joist
roof on the inside all in one application. Spray paint/stain the
joists the same color.
|
12.83 | like bug condos? | MILRAT::HAMER | down is free | Fri Jun 30 1989 10:11 | 7 |
| > -< I'd recommend lattice >-
Chuck,
Is your porch enclosed? If not, don't you get a rich diversity of
insect life above the lattice?
John H.
|
12.84 | Bugs you say... | NECVAX::MILLER_C | Chuck - Don't Worry, be HOPpy! | Fri Jun 30 1989 16:06 | 8 |
| Re: .8
Yes, my porch is enclosed with screening. It was enclosed before
when I had the Homosote ceiling. Now that was Bug-City, Caprenter
ants destroyed the entire porch from the ceiling joists upward.
This is a bid improvement.
Chuck
|
12.131 | Plaster over Ductwork | SHARE::SATOW | | Mon Jul 31 1989 13:43 | 18 |
| We are getting ready to redo a bathroom. Running through the bathroom is a
large air duct. Covering the air duct is a thin layer of what I assume is
plaster. This thin layer is peeling quite badly in places.
My questions:
1. Is it likely it is plaster, or is it something else? Our house is roughly
32 years old.
2. Assuming it is plaster, are there any tricks or things to watch out for
when replastering or patching over metal ductwork?
3. Any other options?
Thanks,
Clay
|
12.510 | Bathroom Ceiling | STEREO::MCLAUGHLIN | | Tue Aug 01 1989 13:29 | 16 |
| I recently remodeled my bathroom and applied a coat of latex paint to the
ceiling. During the process of painting with a roller some of the
existing paint peeled off down to the sheet rock. Other cracks and flaking
has occurred in other spots as well. I have the following questions:
Is there a particular type of paint (mildew resistent) I should use for
the bathroom ceiling?
Is a bathroom ceiling fan the end to my problems? How diificult is one to
install?
Thankyou for help.
Rick
|
12.512 | Supporting cathederal ceilings | HANJA::GREENWOOD | Tim. Asian Base-Systems | Wed Aug 16 1989 12:41 | 25 |
| This is the structural side of the question from the previous note (3420).
To recap.
We are having an addition built consisting of a garage with a family room
above. The family room has a cathedral ceiling. Our contractor submitted the
plans and received the permit before starting construction. Shortly afterwards
the town (Westford, MA) got a new building inspector. This new one in the short
time that he has been here has acquired a reputation of failing everything, and
sure enough at the inspection at the end of framing he failed the construction
because the ceiling does not have a central beam across the roof.
Now, I tend to trust my contractor and to think that our new inspector is just
a bureaucrat. (I will not mention the terms that my contractor used.) My
contractor talked with the building inspector in Chelmsford, and both he and
the previous Westford inspector thought that this style of construction was OK.
However I know nothing whatsoever about structural engineering - it is possible
that the inspector is actually protecting my best interests. Do any of you have
any experience or opinion?
The ceiling is about 18' high with 2x10 rafters, a 2x12 ridge pole and 2x6
ceiling ties near the apex.
Tim
|
12.513 | Maybe its not just for structural | BAGELS::RIOPELLE | | Thu Aug 17 1989 10:59 | 18 |
|
My next door neigbor has the same exact construction, family room,
2 car garage under, and a couple of skylights one facing front and
one facing back. The last step to the framing of the room was to
place a beam under the ceiling ties, and toe nail each tie into
the beam. I would guess it provides some extra support. The building
inspector (wilmington) cam in or inspection and it was the first
thing he looked at. The beam also has a ceiling fan hanging from
it. Its works great because he has a large fireplace that he uses
in the winter and all the hot air rises to the ceiling. The fan
pushes the warm air back down. I would also think that having the
beam at the peak would eliminate an uneven peakline in the plaster
that I've seen in many houses, and also allow for expansion and
contraction of the roof behind the beam, which if it was a plastered
ceiling it might show.
|
12.514 | resolved | HANJA::GREENWOOD | Tim. Asian Base-Systems | Fri Aug 18 1989 10:40 | 1 |
| All resolved now. See 3420.5
|
12.515 | Ceiling - What is the Coating? | CARTUN::MANN | | Fri Aug 25 1989 17:56 | 15 |
| (After running a keyword search on ceilings and not finding what I am
looking for, I am posting this. However, if someone can direct me to
some related NOTES (if they already exist), I would appreciate it.)
The ceiling in one of the rooms seems to have a light white coating on
it, one that scrapes off fairly easily with a putty knife. Somewhat
powdery when scrapped.
Since we want to paint, what is the coating, and do we need to first
remove it prior to painting, or just paint on top of it? If it has to
be removed, how should we go about doing so?
Thanks,
Art
|
12.516 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Aug 28 1989 10:54 | 3 |
| If it comes off with water, it's probably the dreaded calcimine.
(See 1111.whatever for info on removal). Whatever it is, if it
comes off easily, you've got to get it off before painting.
|
12.517 | plaster board ceiling questions | MARLIN::D_SHERMAN | | Thu Nov 02 1989 12:09 | 20 |
| I removed my horsehair plaster ceiling - it had problems.
A "construction crew" of two installed a plaster board
ceiling - well they put up each panel but never returned
to finish taping and plastering over the screws. It's been
two weeks (sound familiar?) and I don't want to wait any
longer. My budget is limited, so I'm planning to finish
the job myself, with a friend. Can anyone tell me what I
have to do? I think I can figure out the taping part, but
do I have to put a skim coat of something on the ceiling
or can I just paint over it? The surface is like a gray
cardboard.
Also, I haven't paid for any of the materials or the
labor yet. Thank heavens. How should I handle payment
if the "construction crew" comes back and asks for
money? Also, I cleaned up after them each time. They
never bothered to do anything as far as cleaning up
after themselves.
Thanks!!!
|
12.519 | Opening up a ceiling | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 15 1989 09:57 | 45 |
| I've looked around in Home_work and haven't found what I'm looking for, so I'll
post it as a new note. As a winter project (I'm a strange puppy), I'd like to
open up my bedroom ceiling to create a cathedral ceiling with one major
difference. I have a full attic above the room, so I want to open the ceiling
up to the roofline and create a balcony overhanging the bedroom, which will
have a stair case up to the balcony area and give me access to a as-yet un-
finished attic room. A quasi-drawing follows:
x
x x
x x /___________ roofline
x xxxxxxxxx x\
x x x
x x x
x /__new ceiling x x
x \ x /___x_____ cathedral ceiling area for bathroom
x x \ x (already exists)
x x balcony____\ Xxxxxxx x
x / x x x
x x x x=walls,roof
x x bath x X=beam
x x x
x --------19'6"------ x x Due to limitations on VT240, drawing
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is not to scale
x x
x first story x
The existing ceiling is hung from joists supporting the attic floor and
are attached to joist hangers from the beam shown on the inside and sit on top
of the outer wall on the outside. The existing joists are 2 X 10 and the
rafters are also 2 x 10.
What I want to do is remove the joists that run from the beam in the attic to
the front wall, so that the ceiling can be opened up, re-enforce the rafters
where necessary, and open the ceiling up to the roofline. The balcony would
actually be the portion of the attic floor running rearward of the beam up to
the portion of the 2 floor bath that has the cathedral ceiling already.
I plan to contact an architect to get the exact requirements for the above, but
would appreciate any input from someone who has done this before. Thanks for
any info.
Eric
|
12.520 | Doable but you need a professional opinion | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Wed Nov 15 1989 13:32 | 10 |
| I think it depends on the dimensions involved. Assuming your house is
conventionally framed, the joists below the attic floor serve the
purpose of keeping the roof load from pushing the walls out. (They
complete a triangle formed by the two roof slopes plus the attic
floor). Some of the considerations involved include the roof pitch
as well as the width of the area involved (i.e. the number of joists
involved). The architect may recommend either collar ties and/or
some additional stiffening system in the wall (the wall the roof snow load
is trying to push out). Maybe nothing is required depending on the
above and/or the configuration of the other framing in the area.
|
12.521 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Nov 15 1989 14:34 | 9 |
| re:.1
I was going to say the same thing about the collar ties, in fact I was going to
lock the note and point him to one about removing ceilings and the need to put
in collar ties, but then I noticed that the drawing shows that the cathedral
ceiling in the bathroom is already there, which means that the attic floor over
the bedroom cannot be functioning as a collar tie.
Paul
|
12.522 | architect meeting results | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Thu Nov 16 1989 13:12 | 19 |
| Met with the architect this morning to discuss this. The way we're
going to get around removing the floor joists (which are also the
effective collar ties for the roof) is to run a new beam below the
ridge beam, which will pick up the roof load for the 14 odd feet that
will be opened up, and run a support down from both ends of the new
beam. Since my stairs are all in a vertical line on one side of the
beam, the supports are there down to the basement main beam. Though the
lally columns in the basement are fairly close to the point load area, he
suggested that I add a new support right at that load area. So one side of
the beam will carry its load down via the outside wall and the other side
via interior load bearing walls. Once the beam is in, the floor joists will
no longer have to carry that outward load from the roof.
The architect will be getting back to me with some formal drawings for
this and possibly another project in this area (a contemporary dormer
which will allow mucho light in in the southern exposure of the roof,
but will blend in to the house's style).
Eric
|
12.523 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Thu Nov 16 1989 15:52 | 4 |
| As a continuation of .3, does anyone have an idea of what Architects
get these days for that type of design work?
Eric
|
12.427 | When is the best time to jack up a floor | TOOK::ORENSTEIN | | Thu Dec 14 1989 15:33 | 21 |
| This note hasn't been opened for a year, but it seems like the best
topic for me to put my question under:
My house has done its settling and due to the amount of STUFF the
previous owners kept in the kitchen cabinets and dining room cabinets the
kitchen floor is slightly bowed. More noticable is the fact the the
cabinet/ceiling joint shows a crack and floor to ceiling dining
cabinets have shifted down almost 1/4"".
The inspector suggested that in the basement we place a 4X4X? across
the kitchen floor beams and secure it up with an adjustable lally cloumn.
We should crank up the lally one turm every week until the dining room
cabinet is back in place.
I'm wondering if I should wait until spring when things are thawed out.
Would the beams be more supple then? Or is it best to do now that everything
is the area is frozen stiff?
aud...
|
12.428 | | NSSG::FEINSMITH | I'm the NRA | Mon Dec 18 1989 19:53 | 5 |
| RE: .16, I think that a full turn/day is too much. When I jacked a
floor in my previous house, I did 1/4 turn every few days so that
nothing would crack. Its slow, but you'll get better results.
Eric
|
12.524 | How to frame/build Tray Ceiling | CSCOA5::TAYLOR_J | | Wed Dec 27 1989 16:24 | 11 |
| Has anyone ever seens plans for "trey ceilings". I would love to build
one in my master bedroom but need the plans to do so. For those who are
not familiar with this, it is not a "cathedral" or "vaulted" ceiling. It
is hard to explain what it looks like. Picture a square are centered in
the middle of the bedroom ceiling. this area is higher up (maybe 6-10
inches) than the rest of the ceiling. A smaller square is raised higher
than the first. I live in Georgia and this is very popular in new homes. I
had one in my last house but just moved to a 20 year old house and I want
to give it a little pizzaz! I gave an exmple of squares but the shapes
do very.
|
12.429 | Dry wood is dry wood | OPUS::CLEMENCE | | Wed Dec 27 1989 23:37 | 8 |
| RE: .16,
Unless the floor beams are wet or have ice on them; the time of
year to do this project will not matter. Dry wood is not more brittle cold
than warm. I would only crank it up the slower rate as stated in .17.
Bill
|
12.525 | Tray Ceilings | NRPUR::FORAN | | Tue Jan 02 1990 14:08 | 6 |
| Hi, I know just what you mean, my son just bought a new home
in Powder Springs, Ga. and I believe the master br has one of those ceilings
and I agree that they do look very nice. In fact I may try to do
it in my cottage that we're doing over now in Plymouth,Ma.
|
12.526 | passing thoughts | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Don't become a statistic | Tue Jan 02 1990 16:35 | 22 |
| It is just standard framing. I thought about doing this in my house
and have included the steps here which seem the easiest way to get
a finished product.
Draw an outline on the existing ceiling. Transfer these measurements
to the ceiling joists in the attic. Remove any insulation and re-route
any utilities which pass over the area. Build a support for the ceiling
1 foot back from the "tray area" towards the supporting wall. Cut and
remove sheetrock from tray area. Cut the ceiling joists in new open
area. Box in the hole with 2x same size as ceiling joists. Install
diagonal rafters joined to the existing joists up to the point where
the tray will become level. Box in upper hole. Install new ceiling
joists. In essence, you are creating a new roof with rafters inside
your existing roof. Sheetrock the new framing. Replace insulation in
new framing. Remove supports for ceiling.
Visit some new developments and look at how some are built. Most John
Wielen (sp?) homes have the tray ceilings.
If you can't find any information, contact me and I will get you the
builders name and contact information from my dad, he has a 3 tray
ceilings in his home.
|
12.527 | TREYS TREYS EVERYWHERE A TREY | SAHQ::QUALE | DOLPHINS::QUALE | Wed Jan 03 1990 10:25 | 9 |
| Probably the best way would be to get a visual concept by visiting
a new development. I have 4 treys in my home yet each one was
built differently due to their shape and sizes. most homes in
N. Fulton are open and you can go take a look. Best bet is to get one
before they do the sheet rock. My builder was FUQUA and he has a
number of homes in progress in Windward, Aviary and Tuxford (all
in Alpharetta).
|
12.204 | The ceiling is falling | DELREY::UCCI_SA | | Tue Jan 09 1990 17:43 | 19 |
| Help. This is in regard to textured ceilings but really it's about
repainting (if possible). Hope I'm in the right place!!
I swear that every home in California has textured ceilings and they
are uuuuggggggllllllyyyyy. Picture a ceiling put up 15 years ago
and then sprayed with small curd cottage cheese. The ceiling has
now been drying for 15 years. The cottage cheese is petrified and
all you have to do it touch it or sneeze close to it and large pieces
fall on you. They make a mess on the rug.
Short of pulling the whole ceiling down, is there anything I can do
to get rid of the cottage cheese? Is there some kind of stripper
that can be applied and then you scrape this stuff off?? Is there
a way to spray paint it so it is permanently SEALED in place??
It never snows in So. Calif. except when I try to remove cobwebs
from my ceiling. Then it snows in my home, all over the rug and me.
Sandie
|
12.205 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | whatsa Gort? | Wed Jan 10 1990 06:11 | 8 |
| re-.1
That's perlite even though it does look alot like cottage cheese it is non-dairy
... My parents recently un-textured their ceilings the proceedure is
get some big drop cloths a 4" wide putty knife and scrape till you're done.
Not a fun job....
-j
|
12.206 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Wed Jan 10 1990 10:53 | 14 |
| re: -.2
Boy, are you in luck! You have a removable textured ceiling. We did
too. We learned the hard way what the easy way is to remove them.
Take a plant mister filled with water. Spray the water onto about
a square yard of the ceiling. Take about a 3 inch putty knife and
scrape off the stuff holding a plastic bucket under the putty knife
to catch the scrapings. We got to where we could do this without
even putting down a drop cloth. Don't get the stuff too wet or the
plasterboard will tear. With a little practice you'll get to where
you can tell how much is the right amount. Don't leave any residue
behind, ceiling paint won't stick to it, it will flake off.
- Vick
|
12.207 | Asbestos Alert | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Fri Jan 12 1990 16:58 | 7 |
|
Reminder:
If it's really 15 years old, be aware that back in the '70s they
put asbestos in that stuff. It only looks like dried vomit.
-Bob
|
12.170 | ceiling help!! | DELNI::MCGORRILL | Its your turn anyway.. | Thu Feb 08 1990 21:06 | 22 |
| PSE help before they write lock me or delete this, I have a guy
comeing out this weekend to wallpaper my bathroom and want to
get it fixed!
-Dean
<<< SERENA::DUA2:[NOTES$LIBRARY]HOME_WORK.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Better living through DIY >-
================================================================================
Note 3702.0 Ceiling problem 1 reply
DELNI::MCGORRILL "Its your turn anyway.." 10 lines 6-FEB-1990 17:15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My bathroom ceiling looks like it was made from a textured paint which
was sprayed. Around the vent moisture has seeped in and about
a square foot has peeled off. I painted the whole ceiling over
the white ceiling paint only the flat area looks very bad.
My question, is there a way I can easily patch the area with
a textured paint with a brush and then paint over, or am I stuck
with having to remove entirely the old paint?
tx Dean
|
12.171 | Strip it and start over | MAMIE::THOMS | digital index operator | Fri Feb 09 1990 07:10 | 12 |
| >< Note 639.16 by DELNI::MCGORRILL "Its your turn anyway.." >
> -< ceiling help!! >-
Dean, I went through this about 2 years ago. My sprayed ceiling was starting
to peel around the bathroom fan. What I did was to get a drop cloth,
putty knife and then proceeded to strip the ceiling clean. You would be
surprised on the ease in which that stuff came off. About 15 minutes and it
was clean. I then rejointed the ceiling, primed and painted (with a mildew
inhibitor).
Ross
|
12.172 | tx | DELNI::MCGORRILL | Its your turn anyway.. | Mon Feb 12 1990 15:44 | 10 |
| Tx Ross, panics over. I gave this notesfile plenty of qio's searching
some note entries and nothing really applied. I took the advice
from a somerville lumber salesman.
First I scraped off any loose material. Next I applied a alcohol
based stain block. Next I applied a similarly grained textured paint
over the entire ceiling, building up a bit more over the old
flat area. Came out great, never know it had peeled before!
-tx Dean
|
12.173 | | MAMIE::THOMS | digital index operator | Tue Feb 13 1990 07:19 | 7 |
| >< Note 639.18 by DELNI::MCGORRILL "Its your turn anyway.." >
> -< tx >-
Looks like you lucked out Dean. Mine came off so easy, I doubt any textured
repair would of lasted long, (with all that humid air).
Ross
|
12.103 | strapping needed? | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Say it, don't spray it! | Thu Feb 15 1990 12:17 | 15 |
| Soon, I'll be sheetrocking a ceiling. The house is 94 years old
The distance between the ceiling joists, that once held up a plaster and lath
ceiling, are a mixture of 16" and 17". I've heard that if the distance is
greater than 16" you screw up strapping then screw the sheetrock to the
strapping.
But, for a meager inch, is it worth putting up the strapping?
Opinions?
Thanks
Steve
|
12.104 | Strap it. | SMURF::AMBER | | Thu Feb 15 1990 12:40 | 12 |
| I never heard about strapping distances greater than 16 inches, but
have several other reasons for doing so. Strapping lets you level
the ceiling with shims (might be useful in a 94 yo house). Strapping
gives you a wider target for the screws than does a 2 by whatever.
Strapping provides a complete backing board behind the seams.
Strapping serves like blocking or bracing to keep the joists from
twisting. Strapping increases the ceiling R value by providing dead
air space.
With time, I could think of a few more reasons, but the answer is yes
you should strap the ceiling regardless of the joist spacing.
|
12.105 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Say it, don't spray it! | Thu Feb 15 1990 16:28 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 445.19 by SMURF::AMBER >>>
So, should the strapping be spaced 16" apart on the ceiling?
What should be used to attach the strapping to the ceiling? Screws or nails?
Thanks
Steve
|
12.106 | 12" or 16" your choice | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Fri Feb 16 1990 07:58 | 7 |
| RE: .-1
Depending upon your preference, you can place the strapping at 12" or
16" apart. For the difference in cost, which was minimal, I placed the
strapping every foot. Double nail using 6D nails into each joist.
Dan
|
12.107 | You could slice off a largish chunk... | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Fri Feb 16 1990 11:44 | 7 |
| re meager inch:
Divide the dimensions of your sheetrock sheets by 16 (inches), and by
17. Unless you've got some means of stretching the sheet, you could
wind up with one end hanging out between two joists...
Dick
|
12.108 | My Preference...drywall screws | FORCE::HQCONSOL | | Fri Feb 16 1990 11:46 | 5 |
| RE .20
I agree with the 12"OC, however I prefer to fasten with 1 3/4" drywall
screws. This way you can screw/unscrew as necessary if you plan
to shim the strapping level.
|
12.109 | Carpenter recommendation below | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Say it, don't spray it! | Mon Feb 19 1990 09:27 | 18 |
|
Re last few
Thanks for the info. I'll be using the strapping, or, furring strips as
some people call them. I realize now the importance of the spacing wrt the
size of the sheetrock sheets! Good info!
The building inspector recommended the strapping, and my carpenter did as
well, levelling being a major reason, and one more not mentioned is that
screwing into those old ceiling joists would be tougher, since that old wood
is harder than the wood used in today's construction.
Steve
PS If anyone needs a recommenation for very good carpenter in the
Northbridge, Mass area, send mail. Does very nice work, and is honest,
somewhat of a scarce commodity.
|
12.110 | | CSC32::GORTMAKER | whatsa Gort? | Tue Feb 20 1990 05:10 | 7 |
| Another reason for furring strips... Have you ever tryed driving a nail into
94year old kiln dryed lumber? I won $10 bucks off a friend by betting him
that he coulden't drive a nail thru a 2x4 (35 years old) removed in a
remodleing project. I bent a dozen #16 concrete nails before deciding to
use new wood.
-j
|
12.111 | | AKOV13::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Tue Feb 20 1990 12:46 | 13 |
| One thing to consider, also, is the type of floor joists that you might
have. I am renovating my living room, and found that there were only
2x6 floor joists holding the second floor on a full 26 or more foot
run. These were one piece joists. What I am doing is sistering 2x6s
onto the old floor joists. This will stiffen the floor joists, as well
as give me some new wood to screw the sheetrock to.
We just got finished removing two walls, and putting in two massive
beams to hold the complete house. It is really going to look nice. I
don't have any plans on putting furring strips up, though.
Ed..
|
12.528 | Removing old plaster ceiling with embedded chicken wire | BSS::M_SULLIVAN | | Wed Mar 14 1990 14:52 | 17 |
| I'm removing the plaster of the walls of my family room so I can dry
wall and paint. The plaster and lath on the walls came down easy, but
the ceiling is another story. 1st the plaster, then what's making it
almost impossible 2nd chicken wire, and 3rd of course lath.
The chicken wire has made this an almost impossible task, I have
tried pounding down on it from the attic, even jumping on it and I
weigh 160lbs. and still makes very little progress. If you are
wondering if I used a sludge hammer, yes even that wont bring this
stuff down. The chicken wire is nailed to the rafters and lath so as
you can prob. imagine It's extreamly tuff to distroy.
ANY SUGGESTIONS WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.....
I WONDER "MAYBE A STRONG EXPLOSIVE"......
|
12.529 | This is what I'd do | NAVIER::CASEY | | Wed Mar 14 1990 15:44 | 8 |
|
Borrow or buy or rent a sawzall. Since you have access from the
attic, drill a hole in the plaster,c-wire, lath, stick the saw blade
through, fire it up, and run it along the joists. Basically, just
cut along the joists until the pieces drop out. You'll have to go back
and clean up whats left on the joists from the family room. Make
sure you use a blade that won't get hung up on the chicken wire.
|
12.530 | You could lower the ceiling | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Mar 14 1990 16:19 | 12 |
| Somebody put up a drywall ceiling in my living room (probably because of
water damage) but didn't bother removing the old lathe & plaster ceiling.
I know this because the LR ceiling is several inches lower than the
ceilings of adjacent rooms. But it is still high enough -- it is still
a higher ceiling than one finds in most new houses.
So maybe you shouldn't bother taking down the plaster/chicken wire at all.
But if I had to do it, I'd use a sawzall, even if I had to buy one.
It's a *great* tool for ripping out parts of houses.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
12.531 | | HPSTEK::DVORAK | dtn 297-5386 | Wed Mar 14 1990 17:07 | 14 |
|
Re: Sawzall: I've tried doing this, cutting out drywall with 1/2" of
plaster on it. It was slow going and the blade dulls quickly. While I
agree that a Sawzall is worth owning, I found it easier to remove the
plaster/drywall using a small axe. For added effect, you can yell out
"Honey, I'm home" when you first break through the ceiling from the
attic. ;^)
gjd
PS:
Also be aware that you will create an enormous volume of debris in the
process, which may be a pain to dispose of. You may save hassle if you
just cover the existing ceiling.
|
12.532 | | GIAMEM::RIDGE | | Wed Mar 14 1990 17:15 | 2 |
| re -.1 Great line. I laughed so loud I'm sure they heard me
across the room.
|
12.533 | Removing plaster from the top side.... | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Not another Subaru..but for $20? | Thu Mar 15 1990 08:59 | 7 |
| re-1-1
I've done that............my foot slipped off a rafter and broke
thru the ceiling above my wife..........What a scream! from
both of us.......hers in horror........mine in pain!
Jim
|
12.534 | | HKFINN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Mar 15 1990 09:35 | 7 |
| I guess I'd just start at one side with a prybar and work my way
across the room, pulling nails/staples/whatever that hold the whole
mess up. Slow going, but you'll have to pull all the nails sometime
anyway so why not do it as you go.
It sounds like a dreadful job; removing one ceiling's worth of
horsehair plaster and lath was bad enough for me. You have my
sympathy.
|
12.535 | One sawzall cut, then wrecking bar. | TALLIS::KOCH | Kevin Koch LTN1-2/H09 DTN226-6274 | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:33 | 11 |
| Is it really chicken wire, or is it metal lath? My kitchen had a
second ceiling under the original one; they nailed the metal lath up and
then put the second layer of plaster on. Once I cut one line parallel to
the rafters with the sawzall, the wrecking bar could be inserted between
the two layers to bring down the metal lath and the second layer. Then
rip out the first layer and wood lath with the wrecking bar. It was fairly
fast and fun! But note that it will take you longer to clean up than to do
the wrecking, wear heavy boots because you'll be stepping on nails, and
watch out for pipes and wiring when you cut out the one section with the
sawzall. I trashed my doorbell wires and tried to cut through the tub
drain!
|
12.536 | THANKS PEOPLE | BSS::M_SULLIVAN | | Thu Mar 15 1990 11:38 | 20 |
| Thanks for all the replies, it makes my job much easyer. By the way
it turns out my roof is a hip roof and is self supporting. You see,
my whole intention was to open the ceiling up and create a vaulted.
I was going to talk to an engineer and have him/her tell me how much
bigger the beams would have to be to support the roof if I were to take
out existing 2x4 ceiling joist. Obviously the 2x4 joist should have
beena clue that they played no role in support of the roof there for
could be taken out completly.
So people, I have been wasting my time sweating over jumping on
ceilings. By the way, it's chicken wire, Idont know what the gauge is
but it very tuff.....
Thanks for tha all the input and please dont be shy, any more input
would be greaty appreciated....
Matthew....
|
12.537 | If the joists are going, now is the time | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Mon Mar 19 1990 10:42 | 4 |
| When I removed plaster on metal lath, it was the "ceiling" undernearth a
stairs. I used the sawz-all with a metal cutting blade and cut through through
the whole mess, plaster, lath and joists and took it out in huge pieces.
But when I redo ceilings, I cover them over.
|
12.538 | Bugs on bathroom ceiling. | SMURF::PIYANAI | | Thu Apr 12 1990 11:50 | 12 |
|
I checked several notes but didn't see this problem before.
We got some kind of bugs on our bathroom ceiling. They are tens
of them. They are black and small. Not sure what to do to get
rid of them.
My husband said it might be becuase it's too humid in the bathroom.
Any suggestions ?
Thanks in advance.
|
12.539 | mutating? | KOOZEE::PAULHUS | Chris @ MLO6B-2/T13 dtn 223-6871 | Thu Apr 12 1990 11:58 | 6 |
| no answers, but a kinda similar problem- last year: flat oval
shaped little bugs, kinda like mini centipeads. I used a Sulfur
fumagator (NEVER AGAIN!) and got rid of them. This year: kinda
spherical black micro-beetle bugs. Suspected entry point: medicine
cabinet wall cut-out. This year's plan of attack: a non sulfur
fumigator on a warm day. - Chris
|
12.540 | I have the same bugs | BSS::M_SULLIVAN | | Thu Apr 12 1990 12:18 | 10 |
| I just baught a house in Old Col. City. I also had bugs, sounds like
the same kind. When I went up to the attick I found small openings in
my fascia boards. I found leaves (very dry) thet are able to sneak
through these openings and the bugs that live in them. Check it out and
see if you don't have the same prob.
Matthew......
|
12.331 | HELP | ICS::HAYES | | Fri Jun 15 1990 03:00 | 10 |
| I have a sand texture paint on my bathroom ceiling. A few months ago
I put a coat of ceiling paint over it (not textured). Then a few weeks
after I painted I noticed a small bubble near the shower. Since then
its grown and started pealing. Just in one area but it keeps getting
bigger. Does anyone know if this can be patched? or do I scrape the
whole ceiling and start over? or any suggestions?
Thanks in advance for any help.
K.C.
|
12.332 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Jun 15 1990 10:44 | 8 |
| re: .21
Now you know why I hate textured ceilings. I think you're in
for it. I think you'll have to scrape the whole works - including
the textured paint - and start over. You *might* get by with
a primer coat of something like Kilz (sp?) shellac-based pigmented
primer on that spot, followed by more paint, but that would fix
only that one spot. You say it's "spreading". I think the only
way to really fix it is to go back to zero and start over.
|
12.333 | | VMSSG::NICHOLS | Herb: CSSE support for VMS at ZK | Fri Jun 15 1990 12:58 | 11 |
| now you also (probably) know why textured ceilings are frequently used!
(that is to say, the prior occupant covered the defect with a textured
paint)
Happened to us many years ago.
agree with the last comment
in re bathrooms in general, some while ago (coupla years) i wrote a
note on painting a bathroom *(plastered) ceiling with epoxy paint.
I still recommend it!
|
12.334 | The Joy of Scraping | ICS::HAYES | | Wed Jun 20 1990 04:18 | 3 |
| Thanks for your comments. I guess I'll be scraping this weekend, and if
it does'nt come out as good as I hope I'll probably be putting some
textured paint back up.
|
12.541 | Basement Ceiling - wallboard or hung | MARX::ANDERSON | | Wed Aug 22 1990 21:54 | 47 |
|
I am currently having the unfinished basement of a split entry
built. The framing, insulation, plumbing and electrical is almost completed.
The downstairs consists of an area 28x24 which connects to the garage.
It will have a family room, bathroom, hallway, utility room and another
room for an office or something.
By this week, I will have to make a decision on what type
of basement ceiling to go with.
Wallboard ceiling
All that needs to be done is put some furring strips up and
then it can be sheetrocked and plastered. I really would like
this type of ceiling since it looks nicer.
Hung ceiling
I planned on going with this originally until i found that
a wallboard ceiling was feasible.
The electrician has warned me that it is preferrable to go with
a hung ceiling because the electrical and plumbing can easily
be got at. He said, he had seen what can go wrong and i would
be sorry in 5 or 6 years when a connection fell out.
A carpenter recommended I go with a wallboard ceiling.
The plasterer recommended a hung ceiling. In the last 3 years,
he only saw one basement with a wallboard ceiling.
Most of the plumbing is located in the utility room in
which i planned on just having either no celing or a hung
ceiling.
In all the houses I ever lived in, I never had a problem with
any electrical outlets or lights or heat etc... never.
If something does go wrong, does breaking into the ceiling really
become a messy and expensive thing.
Can anybody lend there experiences and opinions.
Should I go with a wallboard or hung ceiling?
Darryl
|
12.542 | you will most likely be sorry | HNDYMN::MCCARTHY | Sorry Mike but I'm leaving. | Thu Aug 23 1990 07:32 | 10 |
| Speaking from experence, go with a hung ceiling. My sister's house has
a finished ceiling in the basement and when they added a whirlpool tub
on the second floor, I had no choice but to run a pipe on the outside
of the house to get to the electrical panel. They also want some more
switches added to these lights, I can't do that without a lot of luck
or making some holes in the ceiling. Plumbing is the same thing, you
limit your future modifications (or at least add to their cost) if you go
with a finished ceiling.
Brian
|
12.543 | go for drop (hung) ceiling | HPSTEK::BELANGER | Scurvy sea dog | Thu Aug 23 1990 10:02 | 8 |
|
I second the hung ceiling. My whole house has 'em (I didn't install it,
bought the house this way). I spend a lotta time up inside the ceiling
running wires, and I'd be having big problems if I has a regular ceiling
(I'm installing a key phone system, alarm system, and various other
stuff, it's a BIG house!). I enjoy the easy access. :^)
Fred
|
12.544 | Draw a map! | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Thu Aug 23 1990 10:10 | 5 |
| I'd go for the hung ceiling as well .... BUT, if you insist on the
plasterboard, make SURE that you draw yourself a REAL good diagram of
what's up there, and where it is, before you cover it up. That way
when (note: not IF, but WHEN) you do need to break through the ceiling,
you'll at least do it in the right place.
|
12.545 | definately hung | PFSVAX::PETH | Critter kids | Thu Aug 23 1990 16:12 | 9 |
| Another vote for "hung" ceilings. We had this is our old house and
found it very useful when we had to break up an overloaded circuit so
the breaker wouldn't trip if the fridge came one when the dishwasher
was running. And running speaker wires from the stereo under the floor
to speakers at the other end of the living room, and in the basement.
Remember, there is no such thing as a "finished" house, you will always
find yourself making changes!
Sandy
|
12.546 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Aug 23 1990 18:20 | 10 |
| If you have the space, go for the hung ceiling. I'm faced with the prospect
of tearing down the finished ceiling in my basement to run new wiring and
plumbing.
As an in-between notion, Armstrong has a "snap-in" tile system, where you
attach a grid to the joists and snap in the tiles. This is not meant to
be readily removed, but I think you could pull it apart with a lot more
ease than a wallboard ceiling.
Steve
|
12.547 | Another opinion | CRBOSS::CARDINAL | | Fri Aug 24 1990 08:50 | 9 |
| I go the other way. You will probably gain a few inches of head room
by having a plaster ceiling and this can make a basement alot more
comfortable. As far as access to plumbing and rewiring, maybe well
planned access panels or limited use of drop ceilings in some areas
would do the trick.
I just hate walking into a basement where the ceiling is lower than I
am used to in other parts of the house.
Good luck, Ken
|
12.548 | One more for hung | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | | Fri Aug 24 1990 08:58 | 7 |
| I'd also go with the hung. I don't think it's a matter so much of
things failing but more of the ease of doing future additions and such.
And, the way things go, I'll guarantee that no matter how well you
plan, the place you put the access panel in a wallboard ceiling will be
exactly the farthest distance it can be from where you will actually
need it when the time comes to do the work :-)
|
12.549 | Definitely go with the hung | WMOIS::VAINE | Are we having fun yet? | Fri Aug 24 1990 09:26 | 12 |
| When we finished off the cellar we installed the Armstrong ceilings in
evry room but the laundry and workshop, excluding these two due to
moisture, dust and low pipes. In the other rooms we don't find the
height a problem, the ceilings being a shade under7'( course I'm only
5' so what do I know??) The family room one is great as he put speakers
up inside two of the tiles, great when you watch the "movies"! The only
drawback is that if the humidity gets high the ceiling will start to
smell "damp". Other than that, I'd do it again. It's a lot easier to
take down a tile to do plumbing or run new wires than rip out a nice
ceiling or snake wires.
Lynn
|
12.550 | More advice needed; basement & bathroom. | DEMON::DEMON::CHALMERS | Ski or die... | Fri Aug 24 1990 10:49 | 24 |
| We, too, are finishing our basement (creating a family room and
installing a new 3/4 bath), and are debating the pros and cons
of a suspended ceiling. I've got a couple of issues that I need to
decide:
- In the proposed family room, our FHA heating ducts run down the
middle of the room, lowering the headroom there to approx 9" below
the bottoms of the joists. I was considering boxing them with
blueboard, and installing a 2x2 suspended ceiling closer to the
joists. (I hoped that the boxed ductwork would provide a visual
break in the room, which is large at approx 24x20 feet.) The contractor
is suggesting installing the blueboard ceiling, framed down from
the joists by 9", evenly across the entire room. Any comments or
opinions? Will my way work? (Or, as a 3rd alternative, is it possible
for me to hang the suspended ceiling 9" below the joist bottoms?)
- If I go with the hung ceiling in the family room, what should I
do in the bathroom: blueboard or suspended? The bathroom will be
ceiling-vented, but I'd still be concerned about moisture ruining
a hung ceiling. Again, any thoughts?
Thanks...
Freddie
|
12.551 | Box the duct in | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Fri Aug 24 1990 16:50 | 15 |
| It depends on the ceiling height. Would you miss those 9 inches? I
would. I would recommend boxing in the duct work. Then choose whether
to hang sheetrock or suspended ceiling over the rest of the room.
With a suspended, you could lower the entire ceiling at a later date if
you wanted by lowering the grid. The cost would only be the wire
holding up the grid. YOu could reuse the grid and ceiling panels.
If you put up bluerock, then you would have to have two ceilings or
tear out the sheetrock, frame, apply new sheetrock and finish. You
also would not have the access for utilities maintanence/upgrade.
If ceilings are the same height as the rest of the house, it does not
feel like you are in the basement as much.
|
12.552 | CODE RESRICTIONS | ISLNDS::CARLBERG | | Mon Aug 27 1990 13:33 | 7 |
| If there are any plumbing fixtures (traps or clean outs) or any
electrical junction boxes I believe it is illegal by code to cover
so as to make unaccessible. It makes it much easier to add wiring
or plumbing in the future.
As for covering the duct work it would break up the room and you
can make it look like a beam to add looks as well as hide the metal.
|
12.553 | | CLUSTA::GLANTZ | Mike @TAY Littleton MA, 227-4299 | Mon Aug 27 1990 14:22 | 8 |
| > If there are any plumbing fixtures (traps or clean outs) or any
> electrical junction boxes I believe it is illegal by code to cover
> so as to make unaccessible.
Is this recent code, or something that applies only to basements? All
of the bath plumbing in our house, as well as numerous electrical
boxes, are all walled in. Stupid design, if you ask me, but evidently
met code when the house was built in 1965.
|
12.554 | maximize height of hung ceiling | MARX::ANDERSON | | Mon Aug 27 1990 15:16 | 22 |
|
I decided to go with a hung ceiling.
Junction boxes can not be in an unaccessible location. You must
move it if you want to cover that area.
A house built in 1965 would not meet the standard building codes
of today.
I plan on going with mineral board ceiling. That is what an experienced
installer of commercial buildings told me.
Another carpenter told me that the closest to the ceiling he would
recommend I place the hung ceiling is 6 inches. He suggested I might
be able to eek out another inch or two. Since I want to avoid a low
ceiling - I am about 5'2" - and avoid the claustrophobic feeling
a low ceiling may give. The joists are 7'10" high.
What would be the minimum distance I would need ?
Darryl
|
12.555 | | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Mon Aug 27 1990 15:34 | 8 |
| I would choose something besides mineral board; that stuff is
a real pain because it crumbles so easily. The slightly more
expensive stuff with a fiberglass backing doesn't have that
problem.
I think we wound up at 6 inches below the joists; we had to
move a few pipes which were in the way of where I wanted to
hang lights.
|
12.556 | | CHART::CBUSKY | | Tue Aug 28 1990 11:42 | 10 |
| I installed a hung ceiling using the fiberglass panels and got away
with a 2" clearance. That's 2 INCHES from the finished face of the
panel to the bottom of the joist.
The 2" clearance makes is a little more difficult to install the grid
work and the panels, BUT it CAN BE DONE and the added head room is
well worth it. Even a couple inches height can make a big difference
in how a room "feels".
Charly
|
12.557 | an idea | FREBRD::POEGEL | Garry Poegel | Tue Aug 28 1990 15:32 | 16 |
|
Not really knowing what I'm talking about but certainly willing
to look silly, here's an idea.....
How about making a ceiling out of 1/2 to 3/4" thick by 6" wide
boards? You could screw them into the joists and then either
stain then or paint them. Since they would be screwed in, you
should be able to easily remove a bunch and get to the pipes and
wires. Has anyone every tried this? I imagine the wood would
be more expensive but it might also look nice. You might even
be able to add recessed lighting in between the joists.
Feasible? I'm hopefully going to have a basement to finished
someday. They just poured the footings for the foundation today.
Garry
|
12.558 | 7'2" and breathing well! | BCSE::WEIER | Patty, DTN 381-0877 | Wed Aug 29 1990 19:58 | 17 |
| I think you have plenty of height down there to work with. I'm 5'3", I
don't feel at ALL claustrophobic and all of our ceilings are about 7'2"
high. That's just the height the builder made them. It never occurred
to me that the ceilings were 'short'. My husband's 6'3" and it doesn't
bother him at all (and it's pretty easy for him to change the ceiling
lights too! (-; ).
Anyway, it seems that 7' 2" is some 'new' kind of standard height,
because it's what all the houses <all new> on my street have. That
would give you 8" for the ceiling space. A better part of the trick is
making sure that you keep the walls painted a light color and the
ceiling a shade or 3 lighter. One of the ceilings in 1 of the rooms we
finished upstairs has a darker shade ceiling texture/color (almond),
and the ceiling APPEARS shorter, though it's really the same height.
That optical-Dillusion stuff!
Patty
|
12.559 | higher is better IMHO | SALEM::LAYTON | | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:13 | 8 |
| 7'2" is what you get with 7' studs. If your rooms are smallish anyway,
then the short ceiling height isn't as noticeable. If you're talking
rooms that are larger, you'll need taller (8' stud) walls, or you'll
end up with the cave look. Also, if you want ceiling fans, or
elaborate overhead fixtures, 7'2" doesn't work well. I'm about 5'9",
but prefer the openess that 8'+ ceilings have
Carl
|
12.560 | | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Thu Aug 30 1990 12:55 | 10 |
|
That's the reason I went with a wall board ceiling in my
basement. I wanted ceiling fans. I'm 6'2" and with a ceiling
hugger and lightkit I make it under the fan with only a few
inches to spare.
Mike
----
|
12.561 | 7'2" is *far* too low for me | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Mon Sep 03 1990 13:37 | 19 |
| A 7'2" ceiling height is TERRIBLE! Doesn't anybody ever raise their hands
over their heads? I'm 6'3", and in my last house, I was all the time banging
my knuckles on the approx 7'6" ceilings. It didn't help that the builder
had mixed sand into the plaster for a textured look -- I left blood on
the ceilings in a couple of places.
When I built my garage/workshop, I made sure it had 8'2" ceiling heights.
Partly that was so that I could jocky around 4x8 plywood and wallboard
sheets with less trouble, but it was also to give myself a ceiling that I
never touch by accident.
In conclusion, make the ceiling as high as you conveniently can (within
limits, of course). You won't mind having it half a foot higher, but if
you spend a lot of time down there, you (or the next owner) could mind a
*lot* having it half a foot lower. Don't emulate the tricks of builders
who want to save money and don't have to live in what they build!
Enjoy,
Larry
|
12.562 | MINIMUM clearance for suspended ceiling? | NYEM1::MILBERG | I was a DCC - 3 jobs ago! | Mon Sep 03 1990 16:52 | 17 |
| re: .20
That's great - when you can build!
My 'olde' house is 6'11" from concrete floor to bottom of floor joists
- plan shows 7' for basement. The main beam takes off another 9 1/2"
(it measures 6 x 9 1/2) and there is some FHA ductwork and waste pipes.
What is the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM clearance needed for a suspended ceiling?
I am worried about sheetrocking it - for access purposes, but cannot
afford to lose much height. May have to go with sheetrock in the 'main
playroom' no pipes above there, but go suspended in the darkroom and
office with resultant lower ceilings.
-Barry-
|
12.563 | go for it! | EVETPU::MCCARTHY | Sorry Mike but I'm leaving. | Tue Sep 04 1990 08:55 | 10 |
| >>What is the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM clearance needed for a suspended ceiling?
I think to be safe, and to make it easy on yourself, two (2) inches.
You may have to play with the grids to put up the last few panels but
quite a few years ago my father and I put up a 2/2 suspended ceiling
only lowering it by 2". The grid itself takes up about 1" and then 1"
more for tilting in the panels. You may need more if you are putting
up 2/4 panels.
bjm
|
12.564 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Tue Sep 04 1990 10:49 | 5 |
| >my knuckles on the approx 7'6" ceilings. It didn't help that the builder
>had mixed sand into the plaster for a textured look -- I left blood on
>the ceilings in a couple of places.
you'd better avoid houses with ceiling fans. :^) - Vick
|
12.565 | 7'2" is ok for me... | OPUS::CLEMENCE | | Tue Sep 04 1990 13:49 | 10 |
| RE: .20
Larry,
You better not come over to my house. ALL the ceilings in
my house are 7'2". I also have some ceiling fans too.
Although I didn't build the house myself, I like that height. It allows
me to paint the ceiling without being on a ladder.
Bill (I'm 5'9" btw)
|
12.566 | Are we shrinking or are builders getting cheaper? | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Tue Sep 04 1990 14:38 | 8 |
| 7'2" seems quite low. The ceilings in our new house are about
7'7" (approximately); built with a 2x4 sole plate, a doubled
2x4 top plate, and an 88" 2x4 stud (total 92-�", but knock off
1-�" for ceiling strapping and drywall).
The 88" 2x4s came from the lumber yard in that length; I doubt
they were cut specially for this builder. I've also heard of
92-5/8" 2x4s for 8' ceilings.
|
12.567 | a last plea for higher ceilings | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Tue Sep 04 1990 14:58 | 15 |
| Thanks for everyone's concern for my welfare! Actually, I can deal with
being a guest in a house with a low ceiling, just not living in one.
Provided I don't have to go near any ceiling fans -- a fan hanging down
from a 7'2" ceiling would make my hair stand on end... literally.
However, my main point was not whether 7'2" is or isn't acceptable under
some circumstances. It was that a 7'8" ceiling is almost always as good
or better than a 7'2" ceiling. Painting the ceiling is one of the few
exceptions, and I don't suppose many people do that often enough to matter.
But mostly, I was reacting to the idea that if builders do it, it must be
the right way. No siree! If you have a choice, I think the ceiling
height should be a lot more than 7'2".
Enjoy,
Larry
|
12.568 | | MFGMEM::S_JOHNSON | Chicago | Tue Sep 04 1990 15:54 | 10 |
| We live in a 94 year old house with 8'7" ceilings. We recently toured some
"new construction" in our town, with ceilings about 7'2" and we felt
clostrophobic.(sp)
Steve
ps: I'd go with the suspended ceiling. You'll always want to add a phone
jack here, a cable TV jack there, add outlets, stereo speaker wires,
have a plumbing problem, want to remodel a room on the 1st floor,
and others too numerous to mention.
|
12.569 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Sep 04 1990 16:29 | 4 |
| 7'2" is unacceptably low to me. My current house has 7'6" ceilings,
and I still find them low.
Steve (who at 6'4", is the shrimp in his family)
|
12.570 | how about this idea? | BPOV04::RIDGE | Trouble w/you is the trouble w/me | Wed Sep 05 1990 14:47 | 33 |
| I have seen this set up in a renovated office building that was once a
school, in Norwood, Ma. (now a Doctors office building)
On the top floor, looking up at the rafters, they had installed some
material between the rafters. Looked like they had cut 4x8 sheets
down to 16" x 72" (or close) and put them between the rafters. I
assume that the material had some insulating value but that was a guess
on my part. They had run cove molding the length of the rafters and the
fiberglass sheets sat on the molding. The rafters were stained and
poly'd as was the cove molding.
I thought that this would be a good idea for a basement ceiling. You
would loose no height at all. You could run wires etc, between the
ceiling material and the subfloor above, lights could be recessed
possibly.
One drawback, I saw was that stained rafter ends would be dark. So,
they could be painted white.
------------------------------------------------
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
=====| |===============| |===============| |=========
\|__|/ \|__|/ \|__|/
\ = COVE MOLDING...could be put in at any desired height between
joists
= = Ceiling material...sheet rock, fiberglass material, whatever
What do you think?
|
12.571 | a twist | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Wed Sep 05 1990 14:58 | 10 |
| It sounds like a feasible idea. As long as the joists/rafters are on
even spacing with no special placement to make the pattern disturbed I
think it could have possibilites.
As a twist on the idea... Instead of using molding, use the wall L
shaped grid support for a suspended ceiling. It is already painted
white and it designed to hold up ceiling panels. You could use ceiling
panels cut to the width of the joists. Since panels now come in a
variety of patterns and insulating abitiltes, you could in theory use
the insulated variety as a sound proofing agent.
|
12.572 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Sep 05 1990 17:30 | 4 |
| re .29,.30:
I know someone who's done what you suggest -- ceiling tiles flush with the
bottom of the joists. It doesn't look too bad.
|
12.573 | | VMSSPT::NICHOLS | Herb: CSSE support for VMS at ZK | Thu Sep 06 1990 10:51 | 6 |
| I think it is a clever idea too.
As a matter of fact, it looks like it turns a potential liability into
a asset. The exposed rafters and beam(s) become decorative.
|
12.574 | BEAMED EFFECT | AKOV13::LIBBY | | Thu Sep 06 1990 11:18 | 15 |
| I have two rooms in my house done similar to those discribed in .29, with the
exception that the supports are done with 1/4 round attached to the rafters
about 1 inch up, and the actual tile material is 1/2" sheet rock cut into strips
about 3/4' narrower than the spaceing between the rafters to alow them to be
inserted on an angle.
I find this set up simple to install and maintain, when it is time to paint
the tiles, you simply lift one side and insert either blocks or paper, and
paint, eliminateing the need to cut in all of the edges. As for finishing the
exposed portion of the rafters, the choice of finish is up nto the installer,
I chose to stain and urithane mine.
1/2" sheet rock comes in 8' and 12' lengths about every where, and in 14' and
16' lengths by special order at outlets that cater to builders.
|
12.575 | a couple of ???? | BPOV02::RIDGE | Trouble w/you is the trouble w/me | Thu Sep 06 1990 13:28 | 20 |
| re.-1
What room did you use this method in? I thought it looked great in the
cathedral ceiling where I saw it, but I wondered how it would look in
an application where the ceiling was normal height. Also, in a basement
there are few windows and I thought that all that wood on the ceiling
running across the room might contribute to that trapped in feeling
some basements have.
Also, since sheet rock is a heavy material, compared to the ceiling
panels made of fibreglass, have you ever had one fall due to someone,
or a child messing around with the ceiling?
Since you raise the panels to paint, I assume you did not seam the butt
ends of the sheetrock. How did you finish off the butt ends? The
ceiling I saw did nothing with the butt ends, however, they used
fibreglass panels, not sheetrock, and the panels were installed tight
up against the roof rafters, so there was no play in the ceiling
panels.
Steve
|
12.576 | Use strapping! | SALEM::LAYTON | | Thu Sep 06 1990 14:12 | 9 |
| Or you could simply fasten 1 x 3 rough cut strapping along the bottom
of the joists, like an inverted "T". They'd provide about 1/2 or 3/4
inch lip for the (wallboard, ceiling tile, whatever) to set on. Need
a recessed flourescent? Need to butt two panels? Run a piece of 1 x
3 across a pair of joists. Want that massive look? Use 2 x 3 or 2 x
4 instead. Want rustic? Slather joint compound on the sheetrock, and
roll it with a rough paint roller, or stipple it with a sponge.
Carl
|
12.577 | answers | AKOV13::LIBBY | | Wed Sep 19 1990 14:24 | 13 |
| re .34
What room- I have a duplex, and on my side two small bed rooms, and on the other
side the main room (kitchen, liveingroom) which is 14 x 36 is finished this way.
Yes sheet rock is heavey, but since it has been up (since 1975) there has not
been a problem with a pannel falling.
Butt ends- I have no but ends, sheet rock is available in lengths to 16ft so I
found no need to butt sheets together.
The house is located in Salem NH, if you want to take a look for your self, send
me mail, and we can arange something.
|
12.578 | installing main runners | MARX::ANDERSON | | Thu Oct 04 1990 18:30 | 24 |
|
I have some simple questions on how putting up a hung ceiling.
Must the main runners go perpendicular to the joists or is it optional.
I originally thought the cross cuts came in 4 feet only but now I
realize they come in 2 feet also. I have the wall trimming up and
am now going to put up the main runners.
Do I tie the main runner ends to the wall so it is tight and there is
no shifting.
The instruction sheets are not explicit about this.
I just want to be sure before I proceed.
The ceiling will be around 7'4" when finished which is about 6
inches from the joists.
darryl
p.s. before i mistakenly said i was 5'2" but i really am 6'2". That
is why i am concerned about ceiling height. If I was a foot
shorter, my house would seem very spacious.
|
12.579 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Mon Oct 08 1990 15:22 | 36 |
| RE: << Note 3940.37 by MARX::ANDERSON >>>
> Must the main runners go perpendicular to the joists or is it optional.
No, but it is a *LOT* easier to tie them up if they cross the
joists rather than running parallel -- and most likely between two
joists.
Note that this does NOT control which way the 4' and 2' dimensions
go. Diagram follows:
---------------------------------------------------------
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------
> Do I tie the main runner ends to the wall so it is tight and there is
> no shifting.
No. Just cut the main runners to rest in the wall channel. When
all of the cross T's and tiles are in place it will stay just
fine.
|
12.580 | Panelling for Ceiling? | DENIS::DESHARNAIS | | Fri Oct 12 1990 14:02 | 24 |
|
I'm in the process of planning out a small study in the basement of my
home. I need to install a ceiling which meets the following requirements:
* Must not take up any head room. 2 or 3 inches is too much to sacrifice.
* Must be inexpensive. This is just a study, I'm not looking for anything
fancy.
* Must install quickly.
Any suggestions? I may end up going with drywall if nothing else will
do.
I saw a relatives house in Canada, which actually had a sort of panelling
for the ceiling! It didn't look like wall panelling, but was the same
weight and thickness. It was white and had a smooth texture. There was
some type of molding that ran along the seems. Believe it or not, it
didn't look bad at all!
Has anyone seen anything like this sold in New England?
Thanks,
Denis
|
12.581 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Oct 12 1990 14:05 | 7 |
| Re: .39
Armstrong sells a "snap-in" grid tile system where the grids nail directly
to the joists - shouldn't take more room than drywall and it's a lot easier
to install.
Steve
|
12.582 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Fri Oct 12 1990 17:13 | 28 |
| This reminds me of what they say about software: Good, Fast,
Cheap; choose any two...
You don't say what the existing ceiling is. Open joists? If so, be
carefull what you put up so that you maintain access to pipes,
wires, ducts, etc. for future maintenance.
My first thought would be to use 1/2" drywall, but the finishing
work might conflict with your "must install quickly" requirement.
You can use ordinary pannelling on a celing; check with the
supplier or your building inspector or comments in theis file
about how to fasten it. The nails that you use for panneling on
walls probably won't be enough. You could glue to the joists, but
then you cant open it up to get to utilities. The other choice
would be screews, which may be an objectionable appearance.
I think that there are some panneling paters available which would
look O.K. on a ceiling. In fact, there's nothing wrong with wood
grain panneling on the ceiling. You probably want to stick with a
fairly light color for appearance.
You could also use 1/8" luan plywwod, which you could pre-paint in
the color of you choice. You'll have to touch-up nails/screws, but
that should be quick and easy.
If you do decide to use pannelling or plywood, you might want to
facte the joints with battens -- 3/4 by 2 or 3" strips of wood.
|
12.583 | Homasote? | BPOV02::RIDGE | Trouble w/you is the trouble w/me | Mon Oct 15 1990 13:04 | 18 |
| re-.3
I know the material you are referring to. I put it in the bath ceiling
down the cape. I belive it is called Homasote. It is made out of pressed
paper. Takes paint excellent, and cuts with a utility knife, easily ;^)
handled by one person. You run lattice molding over the seams.
It runs around $12 for 4x8x 1/2 vs sheet rock $4-5 4x8x 1/2
So, it is not cheap, but no sanding etc.
Homasote is also being used as carpet underlayment. I guess it would be
ok as long as it does not get wet.
Steve
|
12.361 | It's a porch ceiling, so it's close.... | OASS::BURDEN_D | He's no fun, he fell right over | Wed Jan 02 1991 17:59 | 13 |
| We have some water damage to a porch ceiling and the builder agrees there was
sloppy work on the roof that caused it. One 4x8 sheet of plywood is effected.
He's going to re-flash and fix the roof and told my wife he'll re-paint the
ceiling... The house was built last January so has had 1 year of dripping water
on it. My feeling is to get them to replace the plywood, not just cover
up the stain with paint.
If the leak is going to be fixed, and the plywood doesn't get wet anymore, does
it really need to be replaced? The top of the ceiling is exposed to the attic
and when I went up there a month ago I didn't see any water stains on top of
that peice of wood, they just appear on the bottom.
Dave
|
12.362 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Thu Jan 03 1991 15:37 | 11 |
| >If the leak is going to be fixed, and the plywood doesn't get wet anymore, does
>it really need to be replaced?
If the stains left by the water are superficial, then it should be
O.K. to just re-paint it. But take a close look at the plywood.
Ignoring the stains, is the wood still smooth? Or does it appear
to have places that have swollen? Check particularly around the
edges of the sheet. Any sort of swelling would suggest that the
plys of the plywood have [begun to] become de-laminated. For a
ceiling, this is probably not a structural problem, but it is an
appearance problem, and it may well get worse over time.
|
12.584 | Who wants to do his attic! | PENUTS::HNELSON | Resolved: 192# now, 175# by May | Thu Jan 17 1991 16:48 | 4 |
| Would Homasote represent a fire hazard? If it is what I'm remembering,
it looks highly flammable.
- Hoyt
|
12.284 | Help! | ICS::RYAN | | Thu Apr 11 1991 14:33 | 7 |
| I'm currently (groan) involved with a cathedral cieling that is a
"popcorn" textured ceiling. I'm having trouble with rolling the paint
on - it is picking up the little "popcorns" and making a terrible mess.
I tried last night to put on a 1st coat very lightly and will see if I
can roll on that 1st coat better tonight. Meanwhile any suggestion on
what approach might lessen the pain?
JR
|
12.285 | fuzzy roller | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Fri Apr 12 1991 11:17 | 6 |
| I'm sort of glad it is your place and not mine! - I have a textured
ceiling, but not THAT textured. You are supposed to be able to get
rollers with VERY long cover material, sort of like a shag rug, which
is supposed to make the job easier, although you will still end doing
the edges and corners by hand. (If it were a wall, you could try
spraying it instead.)
|
12.605 | Supporting ceiling fan without wrecking ceiling | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | Reality is a cosmic hunch | Fri May 24 1991 10:23 | 24 |
| I didn't see any notes discussing this so a new note seemed in order.
If I missed something the Moderators can send the obligatory Knuckle
Rap note and I'll move it. ;-)
I need to install a ceiling paddle fan. Well, I don't actually NEED to
but I'd like to. Running electric to the location is no problem, the
problem is the support for the fan. This is a finished ceiling on the
first floor of a cape so I don't have access to the top of the ceiling
from an attic to install the box. Running the usual support between two
adjacent joists to take the weight of the fan will be difficult unless
I cut a fairly large hole in the ceiling. I really don't want to do
this because then I have to patch and mud and paint and it's not going
to match the rest of the ceiling so I have to paint the whole living
room ceiling which means painting the dining room because there is no
wall between the two and... well you get the idea.
Anyone have any ideas? Can a box screwed to the side of a joist take
the fan weight and vibration? Have any old work type boxes been developed
to make fan installation easier in a finished ceiling? Am i just going
to have to cut the big hole?
Thanks,
George
|
12.606 | Old work boxes available | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Fri May 24 1991 11:15 | 8 |
| There are boxes available with an expandable screw "shaft" which
wedges between adjacent joists; once the "shaft" is expanded it
is locked in place with a locking nut. These can be installed
through the hole required for the junction box; it might be a
bit of a tight fit, but they are designed for old work.
Any store selling fans should have these, otherwise check out an
electrical supplier.
|
12.607 | | CHIEFF::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri May 24 1991 13:21 | 5 |
| I used one of these expanding braces to install a fan the kitchen of my
last house. I replaced an existing light fixtures, so the electrical
box was already in place but I needed the added strength of the
support. It was very easy to do. The brace easily fit through the
small hole required for the junction box.
|
12.608 | | EVMS::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Jun 03 1991 12:10 | 7 |
| There are a couple of notes listed under VENTILATION (1279, 1847, 2745), but a
note specifically discussing the problem of supporting it seems like a good
idea. I changed the title to reflect that.
I wish I had some ideas to offer.
Paul
|
12.609 | | ESCROW::KILGORE | I am the captain of my soul | Mon Jun 03 1991 12:35 | 5 |
|
If all else fails, I'd cut the hole and then cover over it with some
finish woodwork -- perhaps an octagonal piece, with some nice molding
detail.
|
12.610 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jun 03 1991 12:42 | 5 |
| I put one of the expanding braces in a ceiling last week to support a heavy
chandelier. It worked wonderfully - I was impressed with the design and
sturdiness. I got mine in the ceiling fan department of Builders Square.
Steve
|
12.286 | How to Spray Texture a Ceiling | SALEM::PAGLIARULO_G | Reality is a cosmic hunch | Wed Oct 09 1991 12:56 | 17 |
| I'm remodeling my bedroom ceiling which has a textured ceiling. My wife
and I both dislike textured ceilings so I tried to scrape the texturing
off. This worked fine in the kitchen, was fast and left nice smooth
sheetrock to paint but in the bedroom, after an hour and a half of
scrapping I have a 3 foot square area that is pretty much clean and
has some digs in the sheetrock. So, I'm giving up and will re-texture
the ceiling. I have feathered the edges of where I scrapped and have
sanded off the really rough texture on the rest of the ceiling so that
the new stuff comes out as even as possible. I plan on spraying on the
texture paint because I don't think painting it with a roller will
merge the scrapped/unscrapped areas correctly. If never used texture
paint before so anyone have any pointers on how to spray texture a
ceiling?
Thanks,
George
|
12.287 | Don't give up yet | NOWAY::map | Mark Parenti, UEG | Wed Oct 09 1991 15:45 | 8 |
| Before you give up you might want to try some stuff called
Texture-Off. I think it's made by Zinser (the folks who make
BIN). It comes in a gallon can and is citrus-based. You roll it
on, let it sit for an hour or so, and then scrape off the texture.
Worked real well for me.
Mark
|
12.288 | Sad, isn't it. | KAYAK::GROSSO | Prevent & Prepare or Repent & Repair | Thu Oct 10 1991 10:39 | 5 |
| I know that as late as the 70s they were putting asbestos in a lot of that
stuff. So what's Homer Owner supposed to do? Best bet is to just cover the
stuff up. With the laws around disclosure and liability when selling real
estate, I've heard you're better off if you can honestly say you don't know
so many folks opt not to test and instead cover it up.
|
12.289 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | Digital had it Then! | Thu Oct 10 1991 12:49 | 3 |
|
re .14: Where is this Texture-Off available?
|
12.290 | Use a pad
| GIZARD::WETZEL | | Thu Oct 10 1991 13:05 | 20 |
| I have old horse-hair plaster ceilings and walls. The previos owners used
the flat ceiling paint that would last about a year before it would start
massively chipping away. I did the first ceiling with the texture paint that
is premixed (about $50 for a 12X12 room) and it still looks like new. I rolled
it on with that room (non-sand mixture), but started using the sand type for
the other rooms and the roller didn't work.
Now I use a 9" pad and it's great. It takes technique mind you, but
you can do it quite easily. Use a paint tray and only do one stroke per pad
full. The trick is to get it just right with one stroke and (in my case) put
it on about 3/8" thick.
I think I'll get another 10-15 years out of ceilings that were literally
falling down. And speaking of falling down, I used the sheet metal corner bead
(pounded flat) and dry wall screws to put the falling down stuff back in place.
I just screwed into a joist and joint compounded over it. Can't tell it's
there.
Good luck what ever you decide,
Phil
|
12.291 | Home Center type place | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Thu Oct 10 1991 14:00 | 4 |
| I found it at Hugh M. Woods in Colorado Springs, and also at Home Club. I
would expect any reasonable home center type place to have it (including
Spags, of course!). Hugh M. Woods is the same chain as Sommerville Lumber,
so you might want to look there.
|
12.292 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 10 1991 14:53 | 6 |
| Re: .16
Builders Square carries Texture-Off, I think Somerville does too. It goes for
about $20/gallon. See also note 9.
Steve
|
12.585 | Stain it? | HELIX::HOLTORF | | Tue Oct 22 1991 16:08 | 31 |
| We just tore down a lowered ceiling in the cellar of our
20 yr old split. Just moved in. I would have preferred to buy an
unfinished celler hole....
just wanted to let you know I have a bad attitude problem! We bought
the location. But back to the ceiling.
We are in the process of gutting the downstairs, redoing all
the wiring (before it burns to the ground. I am going to find out who
the building inspector was when the house was built so if I ever run
into him in any house dealings I can ignore anything he says). When this
is done (the orange shag is gone - the cats had the same opinion of it
that I did) , the floors are shored up so they don't bounce and crack
tile and we can put in hardwood on the main floor, we will be redoing
the celler.
After having tons of mouse turds and seeds fall on my head
while pulling out the old lowered ceiling, I am wondering if there is
any reason we can't just stain the joists and subfloor white? I feel
much more secure knowing I can get at the wiring and plumbing. The
plumbing is pretty neat and unobtrusive, and since it looks like we
will be redoing most all of the wiring we can dress it up neat.
This will be used as "living" space (this is my bad
attitude showing) but I want to get the most head space out of it and
lighten it up as much as possible. We may eventually do a more
traditionally finished ceiling for resale value of the house, but for
our needs we want to gain the illusion of height.
Anybody else done this? Any hints on dressing the wiring?
How's it look? How do the different ceiling choices affect heat(we
have two zone FHW - one up, one down) and noise(family room is right
under bedrooms, great floor plan!). Maybe if I'm lucky it will burn
down......
Mary
|
12.586 | Looks better.... | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Oct 23 1991 07:46 | 11 |
|
How about white washing. Covers everything in the barn..........
Back to reality! Sounds like maybe you'd be better putting up
a drop ceiling. Hanging it close to the floor joists. That way
if you need to get up into it, just pop a tile out and pop it
back in after your done. And it looks better than trying to
cover up wiring and exposed frame work. It will also keep the heat
in somewhat better seeing you have bedrooms above.
JD
|
12.587 | ceiling heights | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Wed Oct 23 1991 14:06 | 11 |
| I can apprecaite the point of view of someone who can't bear to lose even
1" of ceiling height (and surely a dropped ceiling would need at least
that much). I took down a basement ceiling that was just above my head
(for other reasons) and found that the area was much less unpleasant.
I think it has to do with the feeling of looming menace one gets when a
large object (like a flat plane) just above my head. Removing the ceiling
added only 1/2" below the joists, but in between the joists it adds 10",
which helped a lot.
Enjoy,
Larry
|
12.588 | Pressed Tin? | HELIX::HOLTORF | | Wed Oct 23 1991 16:03 | 13 |
| We like it much better with the 10" between the joists
exposed. It's definetly the "looming menace" aspect that bothers us.
I had another idea last night if we deceide to go back to a
hung ceiling - pressed tin. I just sent away for some info and
suggestions on how this might work. It comes in all different patterns
and finishes and can be painted. If you needed to space it away from
the joists some sort of screw in spacer should be easy enuf to find.
If the sheets are available in say 2'x 3' dimensions I wouldn't think
they'd be to heavy. They might even overlap 1/4" or so and not need a
"seam cover". My first thought as to the best way to secure them might
be to just screw them up. Anybody ever worked with tin ceiling. I'm off
to check the keyword dir.
Mary
|
12.589 | How about this?? | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Thu Oct 24 1991 09:29 | 25 |
| One idea that I have seen used quite effectively is to place 1x3s onto
the joists and laying suspended ceiling tiles onto those. See an
attempt to diagram this below. Using 1x4s or 1x6s, you can get the
effect of a wooden beam and have the tiles placed closer to the floor.
Just leave enough room above the tiles for pipes, wires, etc.
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |=============| |============| |
| || || || || |
^ \
| \
| Joist
Ceiling tile
Dan
|
12.590 | Improved drawing? Neat idea! | TOKNOW::METCALFE | Eschew Obfuscatory Monikers | Thu Oct 24 1991 11:19 | 12 |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |=============| |============| |
|__|| ^ ||__|| ||__|
| \ \
| \ 1x3 strip
| Joist
Ceiling tile
|
12.591 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Oct 24 1991 12:21 | 1 |
| A similar idea is discussed in .29 - .31.
|
12.611 | How Too:Cathedral Ceilings | NAVIER::SSULLIVAN | | Wed Dec 11 1991 13:58 | 24 |
|
I am planning on putting a 24'x16' addition on to my house
this comming spring, I would like to make the ceiling into a
cathedral style with large beams to tie-in to my adjoining
walls. I consider myself to be good with most house construction
techniques, but I am concerned with the structual integrity of
my roof. My calculated pitch is 5" to every foot. I am having
carpenters quote me on doing just the shell and or roof, but
if I felt comfortable with a design, and one that I have the
ability to do with limited help, I would then do it myself. This
gives me two advantages 1)I have the satisfaction of doing it,
2) I could save valuable money. But if I dont feel at all
comfortable, I will have an expert do it.
So my question to you is , 1) Have you done this before,
if so how did you do it. 2) If you have one, how was it done.
I have read a number of manuals on this subject, but beleive
that there is a better technique.
Thanks,
Scott
|
12.612 | Roof trusses | GIAMEM::LAMPROS | | Wed Dec 11 1991 15:45 | 5 |
|
I put a cathedral ceiling on my 16X18 addition two years ago. I bought
pre made sissor roof trusses, spaced them 16" apart, spec said 24"
spacing. Even put in two skylights. Real easy job. I paid $28 for each
roof truss X 16 trusses = $448.
|
12.613 | my addition(al) comments | BRANDX::SULLIVAN | brake for moose. it could save your life. | Thu Dec 12 1991 09:06 | 18 |
| I put on a 24 x 16 addition to my house last fall (actually, I'm not done yet -
see my 5 year plan for details). We also wanted a cathedral ceiling, but needed
some type of collar ties because of our 5/12 pitch - just like yours. One
carpenter wanted to put up a tray ceiling, which involves putting the collar
ties up high, then putting the ceiling up against it. The design we ended up
with (suggested and implemented by a carpenter/builder with post and beam
experience), used exposed collar ties of 4x10 fir beams placed on every other
rafter (32" o.c.), with the ceiling installed around them.
if you're interested at taking a look, you can come over. Just send me mail and
let me know (I live in framingham, btw). My addition was to expand the kitchen.
So, if you're doing that, you (plus your s.o., if any) could possibly get
additional ideas.
I acted as the general contractor, subcontracted most of it, but did (am doing)
things like finish carpentry, flooring, painting, etc.
|
12.614 | More Questions for Ya! | NAVIER::SSULLIVAN | | Thu Dec 12 1991 10:50 | 40 |
|
Thanks for the info.
I did look at using scissor roof trusses but wasn't
sure if I wanted a tray ceiling, yet it would be nice to
have someone else build these trusses for me. Where did
you buy them, and what dimensions did you give? Also, did
you use any exposed joists to prevent bowing of the walls,
or did the scissor trusses give enough support? Did these
prefab trusses come with 2"x3" construction with mechanical
joint fasteners?
In reference to the exposed collar ties, I didnt even
think of this, the exposed larger beams would look nice, and
still give me the full cathedral look. Did you also go with
large exposed beam joists, and if so, how did you have these
tie into the top of the supporting walls. My concern is that
I could have potential bowing of my outer walls if the joists
are not adequate due to size, spacing, or placement.
Would it be better to secure the joist beams( I believe
that I would use 8"x10") by means of a mechanical brace, or
with a lag screw thru to the top of the walls sill plate.
Since the frame of the addition will be conventional stick-
frame, I am not familiar with all the techniques of attaching
beams to 2"x6" construction. I will have a double top plate
of 2"x6" for my walls, and I am looking at using(if I build
my own trusses) the mechanical brackets instead of cutting
the V groves.
I have received a note from another DEC builder, who has
used the prefab insulated ceiling panels. This wold eliminate
alot of work, and give a better insulation factor for the
cathedral. I was thinking of using 3-8"x10"x16+' for the joists.
I believe this to be adequate for large snow accumilation, and
I think that I will go with the exposed collar ties.
Thanks for the info,
Scott
|
12.615 | no 'structual' need for beams | HOTWTR::ROBERTS_JO | Life IS fair in the Pacific NW. | Fri Dec 13 1991 07:13 | 11 |
| The house I built back in '86 had a "Great Room" across the middle that
was 19' X 31' such that the roof trusses had to span the 31'. I used a
sissors truss with a 4-in-12 pitch with no exposed beams to tie the
walls. The trusses held the walls together with no problem and
provided enough space for insulation and a nice cathedral without any
beams in the way. I don't think you need to be concerned about bowing
walls with manufactured trusses. If you want the exposed beams for
style, okay, but you don't need them for structural intigrity.
John
|
12.616 | more on exposed collar ties | BRANDX::SULLIVAN | brake for moose. it could save your life. | Fri Dec 13 1991 11:45 | 39 |
|
The collar ties are the only exposed element, everything else is standard frame
construction - 2x6 walls, 2x10 joists, 2x12 ridge beam. we user 8" lag screws
to attach the collar ties to the joists.
>> Would it be better to secure the joist beams( I believe
>> that I would use 8"x10") by means of a mechanical brace, or
>> with a lag screw thru to the top of the walls sill plate.
My carpenter mentioned that he usually used 6x10's for his post and beam stuff -
8x10 might be overkill (my fireplace mantel is a piece of 6x10 fir that i
salvaged from my old screened porch).
As for attaching...My new screened porch, behind the addition, is timber frame
construction - using 4 x 10 fir beams. the joists are attached to the sill
plate with 1" oak or birch dowels (birch after we ran out of oak). We also
placed some gussets on the outside, where they are covered with facia. where
the posts meet the upper sill plate, i have knee braces with 4 or 6" lag screws
that are covered by birch plugs. The collar ties on the porch are attached with
half lap joints with 2 dowels per side. The ceiling is 2x6 t&g spruce, the
ceiling joists are 4' o.c. with a 14' span. it looks nice, and saved me money,
since I didn't have to finish the ceiling afterwards. and, as I recall, the
spruce was only $.62 per linear foot, and I was paying $.59 per linear foot
for 1x6 t&g pine.
Harmony Exchange (800-756-9663) sells timber trusses. I found their ad after I
was done, so I have not called them. This looks like the type of truss for
exposed ceilings.They could probably tell you what size truss you would need
for your application (example from ad: 24' span, 6/12 pitch, 4' oc, in pine,
$375 each). It probably takes around 42 lineal feet of wood to make the truss
(depending on how high the collar tie is), labor cost might be lower and
appearance is probably better. You might need a crane to get the things up.
There are a couple of articles in past FH magazines. One is on a truss roof
on top of a stress skin panel wall system, the other is on combining post and
beam components in a stick frame wall system. I know i have the former, maybe
the latter. I see if I can find the articles.
|
12.617 | Great Info | NAVIER::SSULLIVAN | | Fri Dec 13 1991 14:16 | 13 |
|
The new info was gretly appreciated. As of 8am this morning
my design has changed. My wife saw a two story addition shown
in a local realestate ad. She is now considering a two story
addition with a cathedral on the top floor. No matter how I
go, I will use the ideas given to me through this file.
Keep the ideas flowing since I will not start this until
march or april when taxe money arrives.
Thanks,
Scott S.
|
12.618 | A Definite MAYBE!!! | NAVIER::SSULLIVAN | | Mon Dec 16 1991 10:08 | 31 |
|
She changed hr mind again!!! We are back to a singel story
addition. Still the 24' x 16' as before. I have found a company
that makes 2"x4"x24' Trusses, these are dry wood trusses, so no
or limited shrinking is expected, the cost is around $60 per
truss, these are scissor trusses as you mentioned to me before.
I calculated that I would need 8 regular, and 1 gable. The
lumber yard that I went to stated that I would be better off if
I bought 9 regular, and made one into a gabel by shuring it up
with 2"x4" myself, this will save some money to put towards
windows.
Question? How would your run a ridge beam to tie all the
trusses together for a scissor truss. Since the scissor truss
already has the 2"x4" construction running into one common
peak point, there is no room for running a ridge beam. Am I
out to lunch here, and is there a diffrent way of doing this?
I have taken your advice on the size of my exposed beam and
now will be using a 8"x8", instead of a 10"x8" this is to much
over kill for a beam that doesnt do anything. I will use two
beams going the 16' width, and will have them spaced 8' apart,
this will give me 8' space, beam, 8' space, beam, 8'space.
My wife agrees with this so I am going to make her sign the
contract with this clause in it, so that she cant change her
mind in mid-stream of the building.
Scott
|
12.619 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Mon Dec 16 1991 15:33 | 24 |
| re: << Note 4461.7 by NAVIER::SSULLIVAN >>>
> Question? How would your run a ridge beam to tie all the
> trusses together for a scissor truss. ...
I think the general answer to this is "you don't." At least I
don't think I've ever seen a ridge beam with roof trusses. As
they're put up they're generally temporarily braced with pieces of
2x4 spanning several trusses at right (more-or-less) angles and
nailed. Then, as the roof sheathing is installed, the temporary
braces are removed.
You can also nail 2x4s on the under side of the top member of the
truss and/or on the upper side of the bottom member. In this case
these braces can be left in place. I think it IS common to leave
these 2x4s on the upper side of the bottom members. The people who
framed my garage called them "rat races". They add a good amount
of rigidity, especially if there is no ceiling attached to the
bottom or the trusses. They're also a good place to run wiring.
You should, however, ask the truss supplier to advise you whether
or not you need any permanent 2x4 (or other) bracing. Their
engineer's opinion is worth a lot more than all the comments in
this notes file.
|
12.620 | no-one was around so I could not ask 'what do ya call that' | TLE::MCCARTHY | DECTPU | Fri Dec 20 1991 12:50 | 11 |
| My guess is that I have seen some, maybe even all of these styles but I do not
reconize the names:
scissor trusses
collar ties (wood right? Not metal...)
tray ceiling
re: .4:
A 31' span ? Wow.
Brian - one who notices but just doesn't know the name of the 'technique'.
|
12.621 | Carpentry for Ceilings | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Mar 30 1992 09:18 | 22 |
| I looked in 1111.1, and I didn't see this topic. Correct me if wrong.
I'm in the process of fixing up a bedroom.I removed the old ceiling,
as it has "lost its key" in many places. After removing the old
plaster and lath, I'm wondering about furring strips.
Some of my reference books show the ceiling blueboard attached directly
to the ceiling joints. Other books show the use of furring strips,i.e
1x3 wood strips nailed to the underside of the joists with a 16 inch
spacing to provide a nailing surface to attach the blueboard too.
Question, do you need to use furring strips? Are they just to "shim out
" old sagging joists?
I have post and beam construction, with sister joists nailed along side
the ceiling joists, to level out the ceiling; the house was built in
1830 with "salvaged" materials.
Thanks.....
Marc H.
|
12.622 | Consider overall job | MEMORY::MYERS | Digital Services Engineering | Mon Mar 30 1992 09:39 | 19 |
| I can think of a few reasons why furring strips are useful
(which might answer your question).
1. If you install fiberglass insulation, the furring strips will hold
the insulation in place prior to drywall installation.
2. The furring strips provide an easier nailing surface (2-1/2" wide)
than a ceiling joist (1-1/2") ... particularly at the joints.
3. Furring strips are relatively easy to install versus
backing-boards at the walls (to support drywall on the edges).
You may also consider installing the furring strips 12" OC rather than
16" as you indicate.
Bottom line ? I can't say for sure if you MUST install them but they
may make the total job easier...
/Russ
|
12.623 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Mon Mar 30 1992 11:18 | 5 |
|
Also furring strips make it a lot easier in running wiring. You don't
have to drill though any of the joists.
Mike
|
12.624 | | BROKE::ROWLANDS | | Mon Mar 30 1992 12:26 | 10 |
|
I would use furring strips for several of the reason listed in (.1).
However I would still drill out the joists if you are going to run wires (.2).
If you miss with a sheetrock screw and have just run the wire along the furring
strips then you could hit the wire. If your drill out for wiring in the center
of the joists then you don't have to worry about hitting the wire with the
sheetrock screws. It is a much neater job, and with a descent 3/4" drill bit,
really doesn't take to long.
|
12.625 | well then don't put the wires there silly | TLE::MCCARTHY | the other Brian McCarthy | Mon Mar 30 1992 15:02 | 11 |
| >> However I would still drill out the joists if you are going to run wires (.2).
>>If you miss with a sheetrock screw and have just run the wire along the furring
>>strips then you could hit the wire. If your drill out for wiring in the center
Thats why you don't run the wires next to the strips << EVER >>. It may seem
"tidy" to run the wires right next to the wood, but even the best miss every
once in a while with the screws.
A lesson taught to me long ago.
bjm
|
12.626 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Mar 30 1992 15:10 | 4 |
| Thanks so far fro the info. My wiring is in place....through the
joists. Is the furring needed for any structural strength?
Marc H.
|
12.627 | Sometimes necessary for a flat ceiling | KEPNUT::CORRIGAN | Had Your Guinness Today? | Tue Mar 31 1992 08:00 | 16 |
| The furring strips also help to give a level surface for
the new blueboard. If you run a line across the joists from one
side of the room to the other you'll probably find quite a bit
of variation in joist height. When I hung blueboard in my basement
I found quite a bit of variation. So I shimmed the strapping
to create a fairly level surface.
The furring will undoutedly add structural stregnth as the
strapping will act like bracing tying the joists together.
I used a screw gun with drywall screws to secure the strapping
to the joists which made the job go pretty quickly.
I would start by finding the lowest spot of the joist bottoms
and shim out from there. I ran a series of lines across the room
to find this spot.
Sounds like a lot of work but really wasn't that big a job.
Good luck.
Bob
|
12.628 | Fixing a Stained Ceiling | ESMAIL::CORTIS | | Thu Apr 16 1992 15:06 | 12 |
| I'm looking for info on how to repair a stained ceiling. The problem is that
one of the kids was playing too much in the tub. The spill over from the
bath room upstairs now shows a water stain on the ceiling in the kitchen.
There also could be a slight bulge as well. Not sure if this can be fixed
with out ripping the entire ceiling out and re-doing it.
The kitchen ceiling is one of those blown textured ceilings. You know,
the ones you touch and the stuff crumbles off.
Any ideas?
-barry
|
12.629 | | KEYBDS::HASTINGS | | Thu Apr 16 1992 15:16 | 9 |
|
get some Kilz paint which is designed to seal such stains, then get a
paint sprayer to apply it. Since you will never actually touch the
ceiling it should minimize anything flaking off.
As far as the "bulge" goes, I don't know. If it is really bad I
might try to put in a few sheet rock screws with great care, then
spackle over them with a bit of artistry before following the advice in
the previous paragraph.
|
12.630 | Try some bleach first | SEEPO::MARCHETTI | In Search of the Lost Board | Fri Apr 17 1992 08:59 | 11 |
| You might try the following approach before you go to the time and
trouble of spray painting your ceiling. It worked for me.
Dilute some household bleach with an equal amount of water and put it
in a spray bottle. Using eye and skin protection, lightly spray the
stained area with the solution. It may take several applications, and
it may not even work well enough to satisfy you, but it's worth a try.
Good Luck,
Bob
|
12.631 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Apr 17 1992 12:22 | 4 |
| Special paint rollers are made for those kinds of ceilings. They are
basically sponges with deep groves. I repainted an entire kitchen
ceiling similar to yours with one of these rollers and didn't lose too
much of the texture.
|
12.632 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Mon Apr 20 1992 16:08 | 24 |
| How big is the "bulge"? That is, is the area that "bulges" a few
inches wide? Or a few feet wide? If it is measured in feet, you
should consider replaceing the ceiling, or at least the damaged
portion of it.
Explanation: When sheet rock becomes wet it looses its strength.
The strength does NOT return when it dries. So a large "bulge" may
indicate that the ceiling or a portion of it is about to come down
on your head.
Now don't panic. A bulge, particularly a smallish bulge, can be
just the result of the swelling when the sheet rock becomes wet. A
small weakened section is not a big problem. BUT, if you have a
large area sagging, fix it.
If I were fixing a ceiling like this I would consider putting up
second layer of sheetrock without removing the existing ceiling.
This would save the bother of removing the existing ceiling. Less
dust, less disposal problem. Just be sure to use screws long
enough to go through the original ceiling and grip the joists.
(Knock a few holes to find where the joists are.)
Before doing any repair, I'd be sure that the water problem is
eliminated.
|
12.633 | | ESMAIL::CORTIS | | Mon Apr 20 1992 16:49 | 10 |
| Hi Charlie,
I would say the bulge is about 1� feet by 7 or 8 inches, right next to
the wall. Again it is a very slight bulge. However I wonder if it would
be noticed if the stain was gone. I don't think it need replacing, but
your idea is great and worth filing away.
thanx
barry
|
12.634 | I used .1's technique | ROYALT::HARPER | | Tue Apr 28 1992 10:04 | 8 |
| I just fixed one almost the same size. I used the technique called out
in .1 but before I put in the screws I pushed the bulge up with a board
to hold it up onto the joists. This prevented the screws from going
through the sheetrock and allowed the screws to share the load. After
applying the stain sealer I rolled on some ceiling paint.
You can't tell where the stain was.
Mark
|
12.635 | | FLOWER::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Apr 28 1992 14:40 | 4 |
| When I was re-painting my ceilings, I tried using straight Shellac to
cover the stain prior to the paint. Worked great and was cheap.
Marc H.
|
12.221 | A messy job, to be sure! | WMOIS::RICE_J | | Tue May 05 1992 11:42 | 16 |
| I am replacing a ceiling in an old house. I have taken down the plaster, and
have been able to ascertain that the lath and the joists are ok. I plan to
leave the lath in place, and use either sheetrock or blueboard. I don't
want to remove the lath, since the attic has poured insulation, which will
come down with the lath, and make for much cleanup. To get to the point,
should I put some sort of barrier (such as Tyvek) on the lath before I
put up the board? The house is not used or heated in the winter at this
point, although it is a year-round house.
Any other problems with this plan?
Thanks
Joseph (doing one room at a time)
|
12.222 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | ...57 channels, and nothin' on... | Tue May 05 1992 13:08 | 8 |
|
The only reason for the barrier would be to stop moisture exfiltration.
Tyvek will not do that. I would apply a 4-mil or better plastic sheet
before the wallboard. Decent building suppliers have this stuff in
10'x100' rolls. Thinner than 4-mil tears pretty easily. You can also
get clear tape for joining sheets; duct tape also seems to work pretty
well.
|
12.223 | ex | WMOIS::RICE_J | | Tue May 05 1992 15:09 | 10 |
| I know that fiberglass insulation usually has a foil type backing, and
since the insulation I plan to add on top of what poured insulation
will not be backed, there should be something between insulation and
the ceiling (there was no barrier put down when the previous owners
poured insulation in the attic). If this barrier will not serve a
purpose, I will save a step; but if it is useful, now is the only
chance I will have to do it.
Joseph
|
12.224 | | MICRON::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed May 06 1992 09:21 | 5 |
| What about taking out the lath( nice kindling), putting up furring
strips, and then adding fiberglass insulation ? More work....but
you will be set for life.
Marc H.
|
12.225 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 Pole 30D | Wed May 06 1992 10:55 | 5 |
| re: .14, wot he said:
Yes. Get some 6-mil poly and put it over the lath, then put up the
board. If you overlap the joints in the poly by a couple of feet,
you don't even need to tape it (my opinion, anyway).
|
12.226 | I still plan to increase insulation | WMOIS::RICE_J | | Wed May 06 1992 11:01 | 13 |
| I am planning to add additional fiberglass insulation over the poured
in insulation; I don't relish the though of all this poured insulation
pouring down on me if I remove the lath.
Also, the plaster dust was bad enough; I don't want to spend my whole
summer vacuuming whatever else comes down.
Will the plastic cause any condensation problems for me in the ceiling?
Thanks
Joseph
|
12.227 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed May 06 1992 11:33 | 4 |
| If the poured-in insulation is cellulose, it's got a slightly higher R-value
than the equivalent amount of fiberglass. In addition to the mess created
by getting rid of it and the question of what to do the stuff, that's another
good reason to keep it.
|
12.228 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 Pole 30D | Wed May 06 1992 11:35 | 12 |
| re: .18
Nope, you put the plastic on the warm (the room) side of the insulation
to keep the water vapor in the warm (room) air from getting to where
it is cold enough to condense (someplace in the middle of the
insulation, perhaps, or in your attic).
You'll want to use unfaced fiberglass insulation on top of the poured
insulation.
Good luck; I have to do basically the same thing sometime in my
upstairs, and I dread the mess. You've gotten through the worst
of it though, getting the plaster down.
|
12.229 | | MICRON::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu May 07 1992 14:57 | 7 |
| When I have removed old ceilings....the time to rip down the plaster
and the lath is maybe...30 mins. tops.
Clean up is 6 hours, though.
Marc H.
|
12.230 | only 1 hour | CLO::POLITZER | I'm the NRA!! | Fri May 08 1992 16:15 | 3 |
| Cover the floor with old sheets. Manually remove the big pieces. Fold
up the sheets and take all the little junk out at once. Your cleanup
is now about 1 hour.
|
12.231 | | GIAMEM::S_JOHNSON | | Mon May 11 1992 16:28 | 15 |
| If most of the old ceiling is intact, don't take down the old plaster.
Go right over it with sheetrock and 2 or 3 inch drywall screws. Find the studs,
mark the walls, place sheetrock in place, tack with a few screws, then snap
chalk lines the finish screwing in.
Saves 7 hours of work, plus dumpster charges, if you don't have a landfill
in town.
Just recently I sheetrocked over plaster and lath that had a 30 year old
tiled ceiling glued to it. Just rock right over everything! put few
extra screws in to support the extra weight they may have to support if the
plaster loosens.
SJ
|
12.232 | Rip it Down | MICRON::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue May 12 1992 09:06 | 11 |
| In my case, I needed to remove the old ceiling because:
1. Since the old joists are on two foot centers, I wanted to add extra
support from furring strips...placed every foot.
2. Ceiling is at 7 foot height now,I don't have much space to loose.
3. I wanted to add a closet and some wiring too.
4. Ripping Down the ceiling is fun! The clean up is....well....
Marc H.
|
12.397 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Mon Jun 08 1992 17:43 | 8 |
| OK folks south of the border ... out of curiosity, what is a typical
price down there for 2' * 4' fibreglass suspended ceiling tiles, and
the tracks and cross pieces ?
Wondering if a trip 60 miles south might save me sufficient money
considering our rip off prices up here for many things ...
Stuart
|
12.17 | | QUILLA::STINSON | "Linda Saisi Stinson...DTN 296-5796" | Tue Jun 09 1992 12:12 | 9 |
| Is there any concern in putting up blueboard on the ceiling directly over the
old horsehair plaster? Such as what happens if the ceiling has to be opened
due to getting wet or rewiring and all the old stuff comes out. I don't want
to take down the old plaster because of the potential lead/asbestos it contains,
and would prefer to encapsulate it.
Can skimcoats of plaster be put on over horsehair plaster walls? Does it
adhere well? Anyone have any recent contractor referrals for this type of
work?
Linda
|
12.18 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Tue Jun 09 1992 13:26 | 29 |
| You can put blueboard directly over the old plaster, sure. It would
save a *LOT* of cleanup. If the ceiling has to be opened...when did
a ceiling last have to be opened? Sure, IF you ever need to, then
you'll have to deal with the mess then, but how many times is that
going to happen?
Personally, I wouldn't do it because I see it as somewhat of a "patch"
job and I'd rather do it "right", but that's actually just my own
notions of "patch" and "right," mostly.
Well, not entirely. A couple of reasons not to do it include:
1. You'll have to redo all the trim around the windows and doors to
compensate for the extra thickness.
2. You'll have to space out all the electrical boxes, although I
think there are collars you can buy for this that just screw on the
face of the existing boxes...not sure though.
3. You lose the opportunity to see what's in the walls and perhaps
add insulation, do rewiring, etc.
The big reason TO do it is to save making the gawd-awful mess that
old plaster makes when it comes down.
I don't think you could skimcoat over old plaster very well, although
it probably "all depends." If they've been painted a zillion times,
almost certainly not; the plaster won't have a rough enough surface
to key to. If the existing walls are cracked and/or loose, there is
no point to doing it; the skimcoat will crack in short order and the
plaster will still be loose.
|
12.19 | I skimcoated over old | WMOIS::RICE_J | | Tue Jun 09 1992 13:54 | 15 |
| In one of the rooms of the old house I have, I skim coated some of
the horsehair plaster walls (after applying a bonding agent). These
walls were in better condition than the ones I ripped out and re-did
entirely. I still just see this as a holding action, until I have the
time to rip those out as well, but they look better and match the new.
If the house is very old, and the plaster is un-keyed, I like to rip
the wall open to see what is going on, in terms of structure, possible
insect damage etc. I also insulated at this time.
Joseph
|
12.20 | | QUILLA::STINSON | "Linda Saisi Stinson...DTN 296-5796" | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:02 | 10 |
| I am only thinking of putting blueboard over the ceilings, not the walls.
The thickness change shouldn't be noticable there. For the walls, I don't think
they have ever been painted. This house has been in the family for _years_ and
the wallpaper looks like it has too. I saw elsewhere in this file the
suggestion to surface coat walls with joint compound, and I am comparing that
option to having a plaster skimcoat put on. I would think the horsehair
plaster would be a rough enough surface (provided it isn't painted and any
wallpaper glue is washed off) to bond plaster? Otherwise I may have to put
up new wallpaper everywhere, but I prefer the look of paint over plaster.
Linda
|
12.21 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:37 | 2 |
| Our walls are never-painted horsehair plaster and they're smooth as the
proverbial baby's bottom.
|
12.22 | | QUILLA::STINSON | "Linda Saisi Stinson...DTN 296-5796" | Tue Jun 09 1992 14:41 | 3 |
| So you don't see any advantage to a skimcoat for longterm wear and tear?
Did you paint them as is?
Linda
|
12.23 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Jun 09 1992 16:54 | 3 |
| If your ceiling's in good shape, why skimcoat it? Our walls needed a little
spackling, but have generally been in good shape. Some have been painted,
one room's awaiting paint, two others still need stripping.
|
12.24 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jun 09 1992 17:58 | 10 |
| � Well, not entirely. A couple of reasons not to do it include:
� 1. You'll have to redo all the trim around the windows and doors to
� compensate for the extra thickness.
Only if the door and window trim abut the current ceiling.
� I don't think you could skimcoat over old plaster very well, although
� it probably "all depends."
Isn't this done "all the time"?
|
12.25 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jun 09 1992 18:02 | 10 |
| �Our walls are never-painted horsehair plaster and they're smooth as the
�proverbial baby's bottom.
That's probably because they had a finish coat put on them. After
stripping wallpaper in our house, we horsehair plaster walls that had
never been painted and were fairly rough. Apparently knowing they were
going to be wallpapered over, the builder opted not to put on a finish
coat. We smoothed the wall over with joint compound in the real bad
spots. If I had to do it again and had the money, I would have hired
someone to come in and skimcoat the walls.
|
12.26 | Excuse my ignorance | SNOC02::WATTS | | Tue Jun 09 1992 23:14 | 19 |
|
Where does the "potential lead/asbestos" problem come from with
hair plaster? It would be pretty rare that the ceilings were painted
with lead paint, which at least in this country was used for oil based
gloss paints. Plaster paints were usually calcomine, because oil based
paints typically don't stick. And where does the asbestos come into the
picture?
Plasterboard can be installed straight over the original plaster
ceilings without any problems - one needs to make sure to screw right
through to the joists, though. If the problem is just that there are
cracks in the ceiling, the least work solution is to paper the ceiling
with kraft backing paper. This is like thin cardboard (maybe 0.5mm)
and has a lightly textured and a smooth face - choose the side you want
for the finish.
If the ceiling is loose, rather than just cracked, then it will be
better to remove the plaster, as eventually it will give up and bow the
plasterboard between fixing points and you will have a "wavy" ceiling.
|
12.27 | | QUILLA::STINSON | "Linda Saisi Stinson...DTN 296-5796" | Wed Jun 10 1992 09:43 | 13 |
| Thanks for all the (if somewhat conflicting) advice! We just want
to take the approach that will give us an attractive and long-lasting
interior. Re the lead/asbestos problem, my partner is working on a
state study of lead paint and health effects so we are more paranoid
than the average person. The horsehair plaster walls can be hazardous
to your health if you generate a lot of dust from them such as when
they are torn down. There is a note on the subject in this file
somewhere and I'm not remembering the exact facts at the moment.
Even "natural" woodwork is not necessarily safe since lead was
sometimes added to the varnish as a drying agent. You really can't
win. But anyway something like 30% of the lead poisoning cases in
Mass. right now are from DIY home renovations.
Linda
|
12.636 | Porch ceiling - what finish? | GIAMEM::HYRE | | Fri Jul 17 1992 12:57 | 19 |
|
I just had a screen porch built off the back of my house.
Dimensions are appx. 10 X 14 with a gabled roof/open ceiling.
The screens are about 5 feet high on top of a 3 foot wall around.
When it rains unless its a windy rain the floor stays fairly dry.
I am going to finish the inside myself. I'm gonna cover the walls
with rought cut ship-lap pine and the ceiling with probably 4 inch
v-groove pine or something like that. THE QUESTION I have is ......
What would be the best finish for the ceiling. I would like to stain
it a light color then polyurethane. BUT like I said the inside of
the porch doesnt get that wet but just with screens there is plenty
of moisture. Im concerned will the polyurethane hold well, OR is
there a better finish for this case?
DH
|
12.637 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Jul 17 1992 14:09 | 4 |
| Use "Spar Varnish" which is available in urethane formulations (for example,
Minwax "Helmsman" Spar Urethane). It is designed for exterior use.
Steve
|
12.638 | | GIAMEM::HYRE | | Fri Jul 17 1992 15:32 | 5 |
|
Thanks Steve - I have seen that stuff in the stores and when you
mentioned it I remembered.
DH
|
12.639 | T1-11 | DELNI::HICKOX | N1KTX | Mon Jul 20 1992 16:19 | 5 |
|
Would it be cheaper to use T1-11 (4" or 8" spacing) instead
of ship-lap? It would give that rough finish effect.
Mark
|
12.648 | Stain drips on fiberglass | ISLNDS::SWANTON_M | | Tue Jul 21 1992 17:28 | 9 |
| While staining and urethaning around my fiberglass tub area I
(or my husband) dripped either or both on the tub. I've tried
using turpentine, paint thinner to get rid of the drip marks, but
nothing worked. I even tried Skin so Soft, (mineral spirits), but
that didn't work. So I cleaned the tub and applied Gel Gloss to
coat and protect the tub. Is there any hope of getting the stain
and/or urethane drips off the tub now?
|
12.640 | | GIAMEM::HYRE | | Mon Jul 27 1992 14:59 | 6 |
|
It would be cheaper but I want to give that Indoor finished look.
T1-11 is great for siding and such.
Dave
|
12.649 | Same as a BOAT! | MR4DEC::DCADMUS | happiness is a bigger boat | Fri Aug 07 1992 11:03 | 16 |
|
Do this just like you would do a boat.
Get some fibreglass paint remover (save to use on Pibreglass) and
remove all the drips
clean up any stains with Fibreglass rubbing compound
use a good fibreglass polish - one of the ones with "POLY" in it
all materials availabnle at most boat delaers/ marinas/maruine supply
stores.
|
12.650 | Pentoff might work | TNPUBS::WASIEJKO | Retired CPO | Wed Aug 12 1992 12:19 | 2 |
| Try a product called Pentoff. It's a paint remover designed to protect
the gelcoat.
|
12.28 | What first, plaster or lights? | PORI::MASTRANGELO | | Mon Aug 31 1992 14:07 | 10 |
|
We are having some work done to the house we just bought. We are
having some electical work done first and then intend to have a
plasterer come in and replaster some ceilings. This way he can touch
up some places the electrician had to damage. But if we want to have
some recessed lights installed by the electrician, would that pose a
problem if we have that ceiling replastered? In other words, is it
better to have the recessed lights installed first and then replaster
the ceiling or is it better to replaster and then install the recessed
lights?
|
12.29 | plaster'er are used to going around the lights.. | TLE::MCCARTHY | but I kept rolling off the couch | Mon Aug 31 1992 15:08 | 6 |
| ALWAYS lights first. If the electrican can not get a wire snaked to an area,
this give him/her the option of making a bigger hole to get it in! I love to
hear "Don't worry about the celing , I am having it re-done after your
finished"!
Brian J.
|
12.441 | Ceiling Paint, Wall Paint, how are they different? | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | It's apple picking season! | Wed Sep 30 1992 13:59 | 35 |
|
This is my first experience painting a contemporary cathedral-ceiling
room (and painting period).
Since the entire room basically feels like one giant ceiling, I decided
that I should only use one paint for the entire room (instead of one
for the walls another for the ceiling) so it's all the same shade of
white.
Where I might have gone wrong is that I decided to use Behr ceiling
paint to be my one paint for the whole room. I'm painting ultra-white
over white, I used two gallons for half the room (so I'm not sparing
the paint, I think), and it still comes out looking splotchy and
non-uniform. I washed the walls beforehand so that can't be it.
It seems to go on a little watery (even though it's mixed well). And
I'm going to have to give the entire room a second coat (a rotten task
with all the wood work the keep clean and difficult height of
ceilings). I think I should have bought a different paint that's good
for needing only one coat (I thought I had already bought that).
Is it the fact that I'm using ceiling paint (how does it differ from
wall paint?) or is it that this not-so-cheap ultra-white Behr ceiling
paint is poor quality for painting already-painted drywall?
I need to buy another two gallons, should I finish with the same paint
or did I really miss it by using ceiling paint & I should do the whole
room in wall paint? Sigh...
-Erik
PS- I bought cheapo wall paint for the closets, and that went on fine
in one coat. I have a feeling that ceiling paint is just watered down
wall paint (then why is it just as expensive?).
|
12.442 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Sep 30 1992 14:54 | 13 |
| I've tried a number of different paints for ceilings. I have noticed that
the cheaper brands offer paints that are specifically "ceiling" paints while
the more expensive brands have "wall and ceiling" paints. My conclusion, having
tried several different brands, is that "ceiling-only" paints are less durable
and have lower hiding properties; the idea being that white covers white
pretty well and ceilings don't get a lot of abuse. The cheaper paints are
also thinner and splatter more. I was very pleased with Benjamin Moore
"wall and ceiling" white paint, which I used in my bathroom and kitchen.
Zinnser has a new mildew-proof wall and ceiling paint for high-humidity
areas which looks promising.
Steve
|
12.443 | Use Wall Paint | SMAUG::CHASE | Bruce Chase, another Displaced MAINEiac | Wed Sep 30 1992 15:55 | 11 |
| re:-.2
I, too, have a cathedral-ceiling family room. I found that using
wall paint for everything works great, easy on, covers well, and
lasts a long time (unless you have a wood stove!).
I've always favored the (slightly) off-whites. One time with a
hint of tan and more recently a hint of soft yellow.
I forget the brand, but we purchased it at Lynch Paints in
Westford, MA.
|
12.444 | Try better quality paint | FACES::WESTMORELAND | | Wed Sep 30 1992 16:15 | 10 |
| Sounds like you bought a poor quality paint. My understanding of
ceiling paint versus wall paint is that it is usually ultra flat for
hiding purporses and thicker to prevent splattering. I have done
something similiar to you as in I painted an entire room walls and
ceilling with the same color paint. For this job I use Benjamin Moore
wall paint and it came out fine. Note, I also use alway use two coats.
I did once buy cheap paint to paint trimwork big mistake it would not
coat evenly and did not have the depth of color.
Good luck, Rob.
|
12.445 | is there a one coat paint? | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Thu Oct 01 1992 10:23 | 20 |
|
Did a few rooms with Behr, "off white" over "linen" last year. No
coverage/quality problems with two coats. The only difference I
noticed between ceiling and wall paints was a slightly higher viscosity
in the ceiling paint (as measured by the viscosity cup supplied with a
wagner spraygun.) Recently, I did another wall and ceiling using a
Sears paint that good a good rating in CR for one-coat coverage. It
*still* needed two coats to get a uniform cover.
I've yet to be convinced that there is such a thing as a one-coat
paint. To lay it on thick enough to give good cover, you invariably
get spots where it's too thick and gives the splotchy effect that you
describe. (it's called something like `checking' or `blocking' in the
trade.)
Regards,
Colin
|
12.446 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Oct 01 1992 10:32 | 10 |
| The problem with "one-coat paints" is that to get the one-coat ability, the
manufacturer specifies a paint application rate which is difficult to
achieve in practice. But CU noted that 3M's new "New Stroke" paint roller
applies much more paint without glops, and can, in many instances, give you
true one-coat coverage. There are also disadvantages, such as the roller,
when loaded with paint, weighing about twice that of a normal roller.
I've never worried about "one coat" and have made it a practice to apply two.
Steve
|
12.447 | hoping my woodstove doesn't eat my ultra-white | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | It's apple picking season! | Thu Oct 01 1992 12:42 | 16 |
|
Wow, thanks for the help. It sounds like the problem isn't so much
the paint type/brand/quality, but my concept of only having to do
one coat. I'll have to grin and bear it while I do the painting
again... :-)
Thanks.
-Erik
PS- I don't want to slight Behr I suppose. Their label proclaimed
"excellent hiding ability" and "one coat paint" but it sounds like
that's a standard lie in the industry. Their ultra-white truly is
an excellent brilliant white however, and will probably look quite
nice once I put a second coat on (fingers crossed).
|
12.448 | paint staff explanation of ceiling and wall paint... | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | It's apple picking season! | Fri Oct 02 1992 11:05 | 31 |
|
fwiw, as conclusion...
I returned to Home Depot in Nashua to pick up some more Behr
Ultra-White ceiling paint. Unfortunately when I bought it, it was on
sale for $20 for two gallons. Of course the sale ended and I had to
pick up another two gallons at $15 each. It seemed to be the most
expensive interior paint they have there.
For comparison I dropped an eye-drop of Behr paint into the other
paints there to see if the colors were close enough to get away
with getting a less expensive paint instead. No way, the Behr was
just too brilliant compared to the others. Dutch Boy was closest,
but even that test made it look like a white drop in gray paint and
a gray drop in white paint in the reverse test. You pay for it but
their white is beyond white. A good choice for a cathedral room
imo, but I'm using less expensive paints for the ceilings of my
other separated rooms. [I've been told that Behr "adds too much
cheap thinner" to its paint by a painter who doesn't like using it].
The paint staff there explained that ceiling paint differs from
wall paint primarily in its sheen. With a wall, one looks directly
at it so it's easier to hide imperfections in the drywall. With a
ceiling, the light reflects off it with a sheen that highlights
even slight imperfections. So a ceiling paint includes extra
additives to increase hiding and reduce sheen, whereas a wall
paint replaces the hiding additives with ones that make it easier
to clean (as he said, "Who cleans a ceiling?").
-Erik
|
12.449 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Oct 02 1992 11:33 | 3 |
| I suppose taste is all a matter of taste, but... The walls of one room in
my house were accidentally painted with ceiling white, and it looks very stark.
When I get ambitious, I'm going to repaint it with a nice off-white.
|
12.450 | have you got a colour for sphagetti sauce? | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Fri Oct 02 1992 12:07 | 19 |
|
I always thought the `thinner' for latex paints is water - I guess Behr
must use plain tapwater instead of perrier!
The explanation that I got was that the costly ingredient of white is
titanium, which is why Behr is expensive. The payback is that it has
good "scrubbability" for cleaning, has a high albedo and it looks
whiter longer. Cheaper paints use pigment particles coated with
titanium or other substitutes which go grey as the titanium surface
wears off.
I guess it also depends what qualities you need in the surface also.
My kid likes the way it takes mud and crayons. Can't wait
for him to try the ceiling....
Colin
|
12.451 | Triple White by Touraine | BCVAXE::PILOTTE | | Mon Oct 05 1992 09:34 | 9 |
|
If you want a ceiling paint that will cover in one coat and not
look blotchy, then I suggest you get Touraine's Triple White.
The only drawback is that this paint comes in Oil Base only. It
is the only Ceiling paint that I have used over the years that I
like, and after painting 100's of ceilings I've tried just about
every brand there is and will always use Triple White when possible.
Mark
|
12.452 | why does everything have to be so stubborn... | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | It's apple picking season! | Fri Oct 09 1992 11:04 | 21 |
|
Alright, this room has it out to make my first renovation job
difficult for me. Now when I removed the tape I had so
painstakingly put down along the edges to protect the woodwork,
(and had even taken the time out to press it into the wood extra
good with my thumbnail a second time), I find that paint had
somehow seeped through the tape and/or around the edges and into
the wood!!
It happened both with my usual plain masking tape _and_ the special
3-M painting tape I tried out too (I like masking tape better). I've
always used masking tape and have never had a problem with it. How
and why did this happen? Was it because the paint I was using seemed
so thin?
And now how do I get all this paint that has been soaked up into the
wood grain off of my plain unstained woodwork? Will I have to once
again be dangling from high ceilings, now with a razor blade
scraping paint off a millimeter at a time. Ugh!!
-Erik
|
12.453 | Isn't redecorating fun??? | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | Life is a Do_It_Yourself project! | Fri Oct 09 1992 12:12 | 24 |
| > I find that paint had
> somehow seeped through the tape and/or around the edges and into
> the wood!!
> It happened both with my usual plain masking tape _and_ the special
> 3-M painting tape I tried out too (I like masking tape better). I've
> Was it because the paint I was using seemed so thin?
> And now how do I get all this paint that has been soaked up into the
> wood grain off of my plain unstained woodwork? Will I have to once
> again be dangling from high ceilings, now with a razor blade
> scraping paint off a millimeter at a time. Ugh!!
Erik,
I suspect the answer to all the above is yes.....Masking tape does
not keep thin paint out from under it. Even thicker latex seems to
creep in some applications.
I would guess you might want to look for one of the paint scrapers
that has a triangular point to it, instead of a razor blade. It
might make your cleanup go quicker.
Vic
|
12.454 | maybe use a more impervious plastic tape? | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | It's apple picking season! | Fri Oct 09 1992 12:27 | 6 |
|
If masking tape isn't a sure bet to keep woodwork and edges clean,
what is the accepted or professional method for doing it? I thought
I had the 'right' way of doing when I saw the 3-M tape at Sapgs...
(Thanks, I'll try to find a triangular scraper)
|
12.455 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Oct 09 1992 13:25 | 8 |
| If it's "bare" (unsealed) wood, I wish you luck, you'll need it. Scrape first,
and try to remove any residue with a product such as "Oops" or "Goof Off".
(But don't use these first on unsealed wood.)
The paint shouldn't seep under the tape if the tape was sealed tightly against
the wood, but unsealed wood is porous and it might "wick".
Steve
|
12.456 | Try Xacto knife. | CHIPS::DACOSTA | | Fri Oct 09 1992 13:43 | 3 |
| You might have better luck removing the paint with an Xacto knife.
I find the Xacto knifes stronger and better able to get into all
the areas paint has seeped into moulding than razor blades.
|
12.457 | I hate when that happens. | WFOV11::KOEHLER | Personal_Name | Fri Oct 09 1992 13:51 | 4 |
| Might be time to think about putting up a wood trim border......
Jim
|
12.458 | sand it? | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Fri Oct 09 1992 14:01 | 17 |
|
You still have to minimise the amount of paint that you apply near
the masking tape. I usually go round the edges twice with a 1" or
2" brush then strip the masking tape while the paint is still soft.
However, I usually don't bother to mask unless I'm using the spraygun
(it never seems to infiltrate the masking.) I use a stainless steel
blade (called a george) which you hold to mask the wood while you
paint and slide along as you go. Great for glass and window muntins.
Unfinished wood is tough to clean with a knife or scraper, but if it's
a thin coat that's soaked in, you'd probably be better off giving it a
light sanding with a palm sander & fine grit.
Regards,
Colin
|
12.132 | Probably not paint but skim-coat plaster.... | EBBV03::CRIPPEN | | Wed Dec 02 1992 12:39 | 19 |
|
This note is pretty old, so what I have to say probably won't help
those previous noters. But.....
I recently bought a 100+ year old Victorian which is exhibiting the
same problem as the original noter. That is, large sections of ceiling
seem to be peeling away. Some previous noters have assumed that this
is paint that is peeling. Well what this is most likely to be is not
multiple coats of paint, but poorly applied skim-coat plaster. Well,
at least this is the case in my house. The good news is that if the
plaster under it is in good shape you should be able to save the
ceiling. The bad news is that it is d*mn hard to get the entire coat
off so that you have a uniformly flat surface.
I am about to attempt to remove this mess from my dinning room ceiling.
I'll let you know how I make out. Oh yeah, if any one has any
suggestions as to an easy way to do this don't hesitate to add it to
this note. (PLEASE add it to this note!!!)
|
12.133 | Another possibility | KALI::MORGAN | Low-End NaC | Wed Dec 02 1992 13:30 | 11 |
| Re: .5
I haven't gone back and read the previous replies, but it could also
have something to do with calcimine.
The way I got this off was to spray a mixture of wallpaper remover and
water over an area and scrape it off with a razor blade (many, many
blades actually). Once removed, wash it down until clean, and use a
good oil base ceiling paint. Looks like a brand new ceiling.
Steve
|
12.184 | Candles? | TWEKE::FLECCA | | Wed Jan 06 1993 09:25 | 25 |
|
We're having a similar problem with ceiling stains. The house was
built last February and is still under warranty so the builder will be
fixing the stains on our ceilings.
The stains are a brownish color but also appear just above the
heaters on the floor. It's mostly where the ceiling meets the wall.
When you wipe you fingers on the stain, a black
soot type residue comes off. We had the furnace checked and everything
is OK. The builder has no idea what might have caused this. It seems
to be getting worse.
It's mostly happening in our living room, dining room and kitchen area
which is all open with cathedral ceilings and skylights. It's less
noticable in the other rooms (no stains on the normal height ceilings
but there are some stains above the heaters). I've tried washing it
off with just water but it just seems to smudge it. Whatever it is,
it's also getting on the TV screen and on the outside of the
appliances.
The furnace man suggested it might be because we burn candles. Is this
possible that one or two candles would cause this much damage??
Cheri
|
12.185 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jan 06 1993 10:12 | 8 |
| RE: .10
I wouldn't blame the candles unless they were a couple of feet from the
ceiling.
What type of heat do you have? If FHA, have you changed the filter?
Marc H.
|
12.186 | FHW | TWEKE::FLECCA | | Wed Jan 06 1993 10:23 | 8 |
|
The candles are in the middle of the room and not near any walls or
ceilings.
We have FHW.
Cheri
|
12.187 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jan 06 1993 10:40 | 4 |
| Dirt is getting or is/was on the heating fins in the radiators. Pop
the covers off and check it out.
Marc H.
|
12.188 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Wed Jan 06 1993 11:43 | 2 |
| How much do you burn the candles? If "a lot," then I might believe
the soot is from them.
|
12.189 | Quite a bit I guess | TWEKE::FLECCA | | Wed Jan 06 1993 12:43 | 5 |
| We probably light one for a few hours a night. We've stopped burning
them since and I'm curious to see if the soot re-appears on the TV
screen.
|
12.190 | Mildew maybe??? | KOLFAX::WHITMAN | Acid Rain Burns my Bass | Wed Jan 06 1993 15:43 | 15 |
| < The stains are a brownish color but also appear just above the
< heaters on the floor. It's mostly where the ceiling meets the wall.
< When you wipe you fingers on the stain, a black
< soot type residue comes off. We had the furnace checked and everything
Could this possibly be a mildew of some kind? What makes me ask the
question is the stains are BROWN when left alone, but are black when disturbed
as if the spores are being released when you touch the plant (mildew). That
it occurs above the heat source is also consistent in that mildew thrives in a
warm environment. The only thing that doesn't jive is that mildew also needs
moisture... Perhaps there is condensation or leeking in the area???
Just a thought...
Al
|
12.191 | Might be! | SLEKE::FLECCA | | Thu Jan 07 1993 09:05 | 6 |
|
Mildew...hmmmm... I started to notice the stains after the last
snowstorm we had (still snow on the roof... only completely melted a
week or so ago). The spots were cold to the touch but not wet...
|
12.592 | NEAT IDEA, METAL STRAPPING PROBLEM | WMOIS::PROVONSIL | | Thu Jan 07 1993 13:46 | 21 |
|
I would like to use this idea, but I have the metal straps criss-crossing
each joist. This appears to prevent me from using this method, any
workarounds ?
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |=============| |============| |
|__|| ^ ||__|| ||__|
| \ \
| \ 1x3 strip
| Joist
Ceiling tile
Thanks,
steve
|
12.593 | replace the metal bridging | SPEZKO::LEMIEUX | | Thu Jan 07 1993 14:22 | 26 |
|
Take the metal bridging out and replace it with solid wood bridging
between the joists. just leave enough space between the bottom of the bridging
and the strapping to slide your tiles between.
The solid bridging will typically be done from the sub-floor to the
bottom edge of the joists but leaving a gap for the tile and the 1 x 3 won't
hurt the structure. Of course putting in the solids may be quite difficult
if you have a lot of plumbing, wiring, ductwork to deal with....but it can
be done.
sub-floor
-----| |=============| |============| |-------
| | | | | |
| |=============| |============| |
| |____|________| |____________| |
|__||/ | ||__|| ||__|
/ | \ \
/ | \ 1x3 strip
/ | Joist
/ solid bridging
/
ceiling tile
|
12.594 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | Bill -- 227-4319 | Fri Jan 08 1993 10:30 | 22 |
|
Solid wood bridging will also probably be more "solid" and less
squeaky.
On another note... might it be possible to mount the 1x3 (or maybe
1x4) horizontally, as below? This would seem to require less material
and provide a cleaner finish.
sub-floor
-----| |=============| |============| |-------
| | | | | |
| |=============| |============| |
| |____|________| |____________| |
======/ | ====== ======
/ | \
/ | 1x3 strip
/ |
/ solid bridging
/
ceiling tile
|
12.192 | mystery stain! | WAGON::BUNNELL | | Wed Feb 24 1993 15:01 | 12 |
| Well....what do you think of finding a water stain on the kitchen
ceiling on the first floor that is under the second floor bathroom but
with no pipes directly above it? The stain is getting darker brown but it's
hard to tell if it's wet or not. The bath on the second floor is rarely
used and like I said there are no sinks or tiolets even close to where
this stain appears. We've had the house 7+years and this just started.
What do you think it could be?
What steps can I take before calling a plumber?
Thanks,
Hannah
|
12.193 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Wed Feb 24 1993 15:05 | 4 |
| One guess:
You may have a leak in a pipe that runs under the upstairs bathroom
floor, or the leak may be farther along the pipe but the drips are
running along the pipe before dropping off.
|
12.194 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Feb 25 1993 08:20 | 9 |
| RE: .18
Sounds like a classic "telegraph" leak. What I mean, is that the leak
follows a sloping piece of wood or pipe down an incline until it
drips. The leak is "telegraphed" or moved from one location to another.
You need to gain access to the area and find the leak asap.
Marc H.
|
12.195 | Check the sink and the toilet water supplies | SPEZKO::LEMIEUX | | Fri Feb 26 1993 09:22 | 17 |
|
Check under the sink and the toilet for leaks in the water supply
pipes. If the leak is not obviously coming from something in plain site such
as a rotten metal trap section or the faucet supplies etc then check the
following:
Another common spot for a pinhole leak to develop is right where the pipe goes
through the floor or the cabinet base. There is sometimes a ring of chrome trim
that covers the hole where the pipe goes through the floor or the cab. base,
its called an escutcheon (sp). Sometimes in the right environment(wet
from the pipes sweating in the summer)a Pin hole leak can develop where the
escutcheon contacts the pipe. Just like a previous reply mentioned,the water
can travel quite ways before dripping off the wood and or pipes onto the
drywall.
|
12.196 | found it maybe | WHEEL::BUNNELL | | Mon Mar 01 1993 12:47 | 9 |
|
Thanks.
We figured it must be coming from a sink about 3 feet away. My husband
is calling a plumber today. The water is not leaking in any obvious
spot; theres no water under the sink. It look s like the wall board
under the sink will have to be removed to get a better look though.
hannah
|
12.34 | attaching wallboard to "bowed" ceiling | JUPITR::MCGOLDRICK | | Fri Mar 26 1993 12:44 | 30 |
|
I removed a ceiling with the intention of replacing it with
wallboard. Unfortuneately, the joists are not on a level,
but are bowed a couple of inches in the middle of the room.
The individual joists are straight, but looking in the
direction of the axis of the joists, the exposed ceiling
looks like (joists run into the page):
x x x x
x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x
x x x x
x x
I guess one could say that the joists are straight, but the
room is "bowed".
The 'bow' is, of course, more gentle, but I need suggestions
for attaching a level ceiling to this mess. One idea that I
had was to sister 2xs to the joists to try to level the surface,
x x x x
x x x x x x
xo xo xo x x xo xo xo
o o xo x x xo o o
o o o x x o o o
This seems awfully "gerry-rigged", though.
Anybody solved this one before?
|
12.35 | 1X3 FURRING | SPEZKO::LEMIEUX | | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:08 | 11 |
|
1 X 3 furring run 90 degrees to the joists and shimmed with cedar
shingles in the low spots.
As long as the high and low spots aren't to severe this method will
work and is commonly done.
Of course there are other methods but this one is the easiest I could think
of right off hand.
|
12.36 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:18 | 9 |
| RE: .34
.35 has a good idea. Another question: Why the bow? Is it an old house?
If so, how about re-plastering using wire mesh and keeping the bow?
My old house has lots of bows in the walls,floors,ceiling. I call it
"character".
Marc H.
|
12.37 | | WRKSYS::CARLSON | Dave Carlson | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:18 | 19 |
|
Run 1x3 strapping perpendicular to the joists and keep it level
by using shims (or thicker spacers if needed) to "level" the strapping.
The 3" wide strapping is also easier to secure the sheetrock to.
This is the method used in new construction today.
>> looks like (joists run into the page)
sss is spacers or shims
=== is edge view of the 1x3
x x x x
x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x
sss sss x x x x sss sss
sss sss sss x x sss sss sss
=================================================================1x4
|
12.38 | go crosswise? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:23 | 22 |
|
I don't know if this would solve it, but I had a similar problem where
air ducts were lower than the joists. I ran 3x1's at 90deg across
the joists @16 o.c. and hung the wallboard from that:
x x x x
x x x x x x
x x x x x x x x
= = x x x x = = shim
============================x=======x========================= 3x1
You can shim it to the correct level as you go. It uses cheaper
lumber than nx2 sister joists, and gives you a wide face for making
taped joints.
Regards,
Colin
|
12.39 | snap! | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:26 | 7 |
|
looks like we were all thinking the same thing at the same time.
cue twighlight zone music....
C
|
12.40 | | JUPITR::MCGOLDRICK | | Fri Mar 26 1993 15:25 | 5 |
|
Thanks for all of the speedy replies! Actually, getting the same
idea multiple times fills me with confidence :^)
re: .36 - the house will still have plenty of "character" left!
|
12.41 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Mar 26 1993 15:27 | 5 |
| RE: .40
Besides character left...check what your new ceiling height will be.
Marc H.
|
12.651 | painting a ceiling | MR4DEC::BGARDNER | | Sun Apr 04 1993 15:05 | 7 |
| I did a couple of dir/title, but couldn't find the answer to my
question. I want to paint the ceiling in a room that is wall papered.
How do I do this without getting the paint on the wallpaper. I seem
to remember there is some kind a tape to put over the wallpaper, but
what is the name of the tape? Any help is greatly appreciated.
|
12.652 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sun Apr 04 1993 21:22 | 16 |
| A product which I have used for this purpose is made by 3M (Scotch)
and goes by the name EasyRelease. It's a white masking tape with a
rather weak adhesive; the benefit is that it is unlikely to pull
away your wallpaper when you remove it. Of course, you'll probably
want to protect the walls against splattering; what I do is run a
line of EasyRelease along the top edge, then apply EasyMask, a
plastic film attached to masking tape, on top of that. Works pretty
well. (EasyMask is not a 3M product, and I may not have the name
exact.)
The most important part is to make sure that the tape is pressed
firmly along the edges. Even then, be very careful when you paint
towards the edges. You may end up with some paint running under
the tape no matter what you do.
Steve
|
12.653 | Ceiling repair | FSOA::MADSEN | | Fri Apr 30 1993 12:17 | 16 |
| I need to clean, repair, primer and paint my cathedral ceiling.
I've seen notes similar to this question but...
any suggestions on with what and what tool would work best
to 'clean' the ceiling. It's got a skip trowel type of texture,
ie; very rough. A spong would only tear apart. I was thinking
of trying to get a lng pole to attach to a thick nap roller when
i need to apply the primer and then the paint. Which leads me to..
'DO' i really need to primer the ceiling first?? It has never been
painted. Or can I just get away with a paint job, after cleaning
and repairing some cracks?
I had some water damage during the last blizzard, snow
got into the area between the roof and the cathedral ceiling so
now it needs to be fixed (some how seal the water damage area,
and repair some minor cracks. thought I'd do this myself as the
estimate was $1K and I could do it for less than that $. I could
use the $ to repair the roof shingles (not storm related).
|
12.654 | KILZ | CSLALL::CDUBOIS | | Tue May 04 1993 08:28 | 14 |
| HI,
don't know about the rest of the stuff, but if you have just a stain
from water (not so much damage that it needs to be replaced), you
can use a product called KILZ. It's a primer that resists letting
a stain seep through. It can be obtained from any NHD or Home Depot
type place. Also, I have walls with kinda smoothed over stucco, bumpy
look, I don't know texture, and we painted them with a roller, and it
did a good job. As far as priming it is concerned, if you think the
first coat will get absorbed, I'd go for it.
cd
|
12.689 | water stains removal | FSOA::MADSEN | | Wed May 05 1993 10:21 | 3 |
| Is there anything available that will CLEAN off a water
stain on a ceiling, so that i don't HAVE to repaint.
Would bleach do it?? The ceiling has never been painted.
|
12.690 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed May 05 1993 11:47 | 5 |
| No.
Use "Bins" and repaint.
Marc H.
|
12.691 | I used to think you could do that | RAGMOP::T_PARMENTER | Human. All too human. | Wed May 05 1993 13:18 | 3 |
| I wouldn't paint the stain until I had found and fixed the leak that
caused it.
|
12.692 | Bleach worked fairly well for us | WMOIS::PHILPOT | | Thu May 06 1993 10:09 | 9 |
| We recently used diluted bleach on water stains on a never-painted
plaster ceiling. They didn't go away totally, but they're MUCH
lighter. I don't think anyone coming into the room would notice the
spots now unless they were specifically looking for them. (They were
very noticeable before!)
Try the bleach - it's worth a try, and if you're happy with the
results, it sure beats painting the ceiling!
|
12.693 | shoe polish? | SCHOOL::HOWARTH | | Thu May 06 1993 13:47 | 4 |
| I have seen white shoe polish used with great results. The stain
sizes were small however.
Joe
|
12.694 | Bleach it is, thanks for the tip | FSOA::MADSEN | | Fri May 07 1993 11:10 | 6 |
| I'd much rather try to 'clean' them up, than paint. Like yours
mine has never been painted. It's not only
the cost, as I said i need the money for the roof but it's a cathedral
ceiling (not an expecially high one) but none the less - cathedral so
that's certainly additional work. I'll try the bleach, nothing
ventured... etc. Thanks for the info on the bleach.
|
12.641 | can I insulate the ceiling ? | ICS::STUART | | Wed May 26 1993 13:20 | 16 |
|
I built a 10'X12' screened porch very similar to the base note.
I used 2"X6" 's for roof rafters that overhang the walls about
6 inches. I enclosed the overhang with soffit and facia boards.
I didn't put and ridge or soffit vents. I'm going to put V-groove
on the ceiling. Will I have a problem if I insulate the ceiling ?
I'm building removable windows and will insulate the floor to
make it more like a 3 season porch. I'm not sure if there will
be a condensation problem on the roof without vents.
I could put those round plastic ~3/4" vent thingys in the facia
between each rafter but there would still be no ventalation at
the top.
Randy
|
12.642 | ventilate, ventilate, ventilate | CRLVMS::BLACK | Andrew P. Black | Thu May 27 1993 01:28 | 23 |
| You *will* get condensation in your insulation if you just fill that
space with a 6" batt. The roof boards will rot, adnteh insulation will
get wet and mouldy. Don't do it.
Add the soffit vents. Add a ridge vent. Buy those expanded polystyrene
channel things to go between the rafters and maintain the air-flow (the
trade name is "propa-vent". You will the then have room for a 4"
insulation batt.
This isn't enough insulation for a ceiling in New England. So screw
2" of ridgid foam over the whole ceiling, after you have put on the
strapping but before the sheetrock. The only problem with this apprach
is that you will need 4" sheetrock screws, and that is it sometimes
hard to find the strapping.
When we finished our attic -- which gives rise to exactly the same
problems as you have -- getting proper ventiltion into the roof space
was about the _only_ thing that the building inspector was really keen
on checking. You will have to check your plans with your building
inspector, so you may as well plan to do it right from the start.
Andrew
|
12.643 | maybe some styrofoam ? | ICS::STUART | | Thu May 27 1993 13:23 | 13 |
|
It's kinda late for ridge vents .... I'm not ripping off the
shingles.
How about if I put sheets of styrofoam type insulation instead
of fibergalss ?? Will I still get the condensation ?
I'm putting V-groove boards for a ceiling not sheetrock. I may
even put ship-lap so I don't believe it will be air tight
between the boards and the roof.
Randy
|
12.644 | why didn't I think of that... oh, I did ! | ICS::STUART | | Thu May 27 1993 13:38 | 22 |
|
I just had an idea !! who'd a thought !!
current /\ idea /\
/ \ / \
/ \ /vent\
/ \ / \
/ \ /--------\
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
/ \ / \
-| |- vent > -| |- < vent
| | | |
This way I could use fiberglass with the styrofoam vent thingys
between the rafters !
Although one side of the porch is the house so there will only
be one gable vent(I thinks thats what its called) is this ok ?
Randy
|
12.645 | gable vent? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Thu May 27 1993 13:39 | 17 |
| If it's a gable-end, how about blanking off part of the apex of the
ceiling and putting in a gable vent:
+
/ \
/ <----------circulation space leading to gable vent
/ \
/ ----- \
/ / \ <---- gap between inner v groove & insulation
/ / \ \ and roof skin
/ / \ \
/ / \ \
/ / \ \
--- Soffit vents (in)
|
12.646 | crash | SMURF::WALTERS | | Thu May 27 1993 13:40 | 4 |
|
Another notes collision!
C
|
12.647 | Comments on this? | MNATUR::LISTON | CSP-PSC/E - When you need to deliver the very best! | Fri May 28 1993 15:26 | 34 |
|
+--------
| -------
| -------
| -------
| -------
+----------------------------------------------+
| Wall Headers | ^
| | L---- Screened vent
| | along length of
| | porch
| |
House wall
I'm about to put a v-groove ceiling on my porch, built similar to
prior replies. I've got a section of 2" wide venting running along the
entire length of the soffit. The roof of the porch attaches directly
to the outside wall of the house so there is no ridge vent. I don't
remember the slope of the roof.
I was thinking of putting a similar vent along the inside roof where
the rafters meet the house wall, putting up 3" of insulation (6" rafters)
along with the pre-fab styrofoam ventilation channels, and then the
v-groove.
Any comments on this configuration? I can't vent the roof to the
outside where it meets the house. Should I just skip the insulation
altogether but keep the vent at the top inside?
Thanks,
Kevin
|
12.398 | Help please..... | LUDWIG::BERNIER | | Tue Jul 13 1993 11:18 | 20 |
|
Some Questions for a first timer.......
I was examining a suspended ceiling in another room and the material
to do it at Grossmans and these are my assumptions, please correct me
if I am in error.
The outside "L" borders come in ten foot lengths and the "T" come in
four foot lengths (and possiblly longer?). The "T" had tabs the
interconnect into other "T's" and the "L's" on one side and are cut
and not connected on the other. Eyelets are screwed into the ceiling
and wires support the cross members. I plan on using a level to make
it as level as possible and leaving about four inches on top.
Any input/suggestions/comments?
Thanks.....
/Andy
|
12.399 | a few things i regret no doing.... | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue Jul 13 1993 12:37 | 22 |
| If you have no pipes or other obstructions, you can get away with
3" clearance. Other things I'd recommend are:
make or rent a water level to establish the level arount the room.
You can do it with a carpenters level and a mason's string level, but
it takes a lot of time & fiddling.
Use a fine tooth metal blade in a power mitre saw for cutting.
Cover the painted face with masking tape, and mark cutting lengths on
the tape, then cut through it to prevent marring the finish.
pre-drill the holes in the "L" border before hanging it.
That's all I can think of - it's not a tough task.
Regards,
Colin
|
12.400 | | TEKVAX::KOPEC | Free Stupidity Screening $5 | Tue Jul 13 1993 13:05 | 16 |
| There are actually two different kinds of T-rails (at least in the
armstrong ceiling I put up last fall): the 'main T' which comes in long
lengths (8 or 10 feet), and the 'cross T' which comes in 2 or 4 foot
length and goes between main T's. In the ceiling system I used,
nothing attaches to the L rails; the main and cross T's just sit on
them.
Predrilling the L rails is a good idea. Make sure you don't tighten the
screws on the L rails too tight or they'll kink. Using a pan-head
rather than a bugle head screw, and a soft touch on the power
screwdriver, helps here.
Once you get the level mark on the wall, these things go up amazingly
quickly.
...tom
|
12.401 | How do you install around a stairwell? | MSBCS::PAGLIARULO_G | Reality is a cosmic hunch | Wed Jul 14 1993 08:52 | 15 |
| I'm going to be installing a suspended ceiling soon in a basement room and
have a question. The house is a cape with a center stairway. The room
in question contains the stairwell. One side of the stairwell is open
to the room so that from the room side there is no wall there at all
and from th stairs side there is a 1/2 wall. I hope that's good
enough to explain the set-up, typical cape cellar stairs. I was standing
in the basement the other day looking around at the walls thinking - Ok, I
can attach the L runner there on that wall and that wall there is ok
and that one looks good and..... I got to the stairwell and there is
no place to attach the runner. On that side if I attach the runner 3"
below the joists then when I come down the stairs I'll see a 3" space
between the ceiling and the stairwell wall. How does this situation
get handled? Do you use filler panels or something?
George
|
12.402 | More.... | LUDWIG::BERNIER | | Tue Jul 20 1993 12:00 | 15 |
|
I have noticed the the larger "T's" can interconnect with each other.
(End to end) But if I am going with a 12 foot room I and able to only
utilize 2 feet from each end and the center piece is left. I did not
see any of the larger "T's" in shorter lengths than the standard 10
footers.
Also, at what intervals is it recomended the hangers be placed? I plan
on getting th stuff this weekend and think it out for another week
before attacking it.
Thanks for your great advice folks, I appreciate it.
/ab
|
12.403 | This is what I did | CACHE::BEAUREGARD | Roger Beauregard | Tue Jul 20 1993 13:30 | 21 |
| If I remember correctly when I did mine, the "larger T's" are 12', the
"L" brackets (wall mount) are 10' and the cross T's are 4' and 2'. I
also pondered about how to connect the "large T's" once one end was cut
off. What you do is put the cut end on the L bracket. If your room is
larger that 12' (let's use 14' for an example) You start with a 12' and
cut 2' from the next. Now the next T is 10' and you cut 4' from the
next. Then you have 8' and cut 6' from the next .....and so on.
Top View
| |
|__________________12'________________________|___2'____|
| |
| |
|__________________10'_________________|_______4'_______|
| |
| |
|___________8'________________|____________6'___________|
| |
Roger
|
12.404 | Grab a freebie.. | TEKVAX::KOPEC | Free Stupidity Screening $5 | Wed Jul 21 1993 09:24 | 5 |
| the larger self-service lumber yards (HQ, Home Depot, etc) usually have
piles of the armstrong installation brochures stacked near the ceiling
panels; it's a pretty good guide to how-to-do-it..
...tom
|
12.405 | Thanks.... | LUDWIG::BERNIER | | Wed Jul 21 1993 09:57 | 7 |
|
I checked out Grossman's and they did not have any info available.
Thanks to the replies in here I feel confident I can get this done
correctly.
thanks again..........
|
12.655 | Wood Ceiling finish?? | ADISSW::FERRARA | | Wed Feb 02 1994 07:48 | 17 |
| I need to put some type of finish on our pine, tongue-and-groove
ceiling. It is VERY dry looking, being about 12 yrs old.
I don't think there is any polyuerthane (sp?) on it.
Can anybody suggest what should/should not be applied to a
ceiling??
Whatever I do, I just want to do 1 coat.
I was thinking of putting just a very low luster polyuerthane on
it.
Any comments?
Thanks,
Bob F.
|
12.656 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Feb 02 1994 09:32 | 4 |
| You'd better find out what it was finished with before. If it was any sort
of oil, polyurethane won't stick.
Steve
|
12.657 | Don't think it was oil... | ADISSW::FERRARA | | Wed Feb 02 1994 10:05 | 6 |
| There's no way I can find out for sure whats on the ceiling, for
sure.
I don't think it was an oil-based finish that was put on it.
-bob
|
12.658 | | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Gotta love log homes | Wed Feb 02 1994 13:22 | 12 |
| Well, you could test a small corner some way with poly. If it doesn't stick,
then the previous application was oil.
I'm gearing up to poly my new pine T&G ceiling, Minwax Satin. But poly needs at
least 3 coats. Another product I've used (on the walls of our log home) is
Minwax Wood Finish. It's an oil-based finish that you optionally cover with
poly. It may be okay for a ceiling. I wouldn't recommend it in a bathroom or
kitchen, though, since it won't be able to protect the wood against that much
moisture. The Wood Finish requires two coats, but it's a lot easier to apply
than poly.
Elaine
|
12.659 | Linseed oil | STRATA::POOLE | | Sat Feb 05 1994 05:02 | 4 |
| If the wood isn't finished you could just use linseed oil. Rub it on
with a rag. That should give the wood a little luster.
Scott
|
12.660 | Ceiling tile - 1 ft sq? | SMOKEN::WROTHBERG | WB1HBB | Mon May 30 1994 11:30 | 11 |
|
Due to ice damage this past winter, I must replace 8 ceiling
tiles on my 3 season porch. They are 1 foot square and look like
"pressed paper". I can not find a dealer (S. NH) that carries
these - everyone has gone to dropped ceilings.
The pattern doesn't matter too much as I am going to repaint the
whole thing anyway. Can someone point me to a dealer that might
carry these?
Thanks, Warren
|
12.661 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, PATHWORKS for Win. NT | Tue May 31 1994 01:36 | 9 |
| 1 ft sq ceiling tiles are available almost everywhere. I got
mine at home depot. Mine cost $16/box (40 tiles/box). Home
Depot at least I believe allows you to buy single pieces too
(and all the tiles in a box have individual upc labels stuck
on the back of them).
How big is your room? You might as well replace the whole
room depending on the size (it only cost me ~ $100 to do
my whole kitchen).
|
12.662 | Thanks | SMOKEN::WROTHBERG | WB1HBB | Tue May 31 1994 09:43 | 6 |
|
Thanks, Jeff. The room is 14' X 14'. I just may do the whole
room!
Warren
|
12.663 | Take out ceilings in a ranch? | TPSYS::WEST | | Mon Jul 18 1994 09:13 | 63 |
|
How can one remove ceilings in a ranch and not destroy the
structural integrity?
We have a single story ranch, 24 x 38 size, with a unfinshed attic
which is about 5-6 feet high at the max.
/\ There are no trusses or supports in the interior
/ \ of the attic, so roof beams are sized enough
/ \ to support NH snow loads..
/ \
/ \
----------
| | | Ranch has center interior wall the length of the
| | | house which would not be removed. The house is very
| | | well built, very solid construction.
-----------
To modernize and open up the house, we have discussed taking out the
ceilings in all or part of the house, adding skylights as necessary,
and raising the interior walls to the new ceiling height.
We have minimal insulation in the ceiling now, so we would have to
heavily insulate the roof prior to sheetrock.
Of course, wiring redo would be a must for all runs in the ceilings.
The main question is structural rigidity. I would think I would still
need something to tie the exterior walls together to prevent roof loads
from bowing the walls out. Would the few remaining interior walls
left be adequate to tie the outsides together (floor plan below), or
would I have to add open beams.
-----------------------------------------
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| br | ba |st |kit |
| | | | |
| | | | |
-----------------------------------------
| | |
| | |
| | |
| br | lr/din |
| | |
| | |
-----------------------------------------
Obviously, something of this import would need professional design
and consideration, which I would do. But I am looking for opionions
on feasibility, economic sense (No idea of cost and benefit, versus
using the money to add on a room), or anyone who has done such a thing.
We might just take them out in the kitchen and bathroom, too (too open
them up and add skylights.
Bob
|
12.664 | tie it all together. | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon Jul 18 1994 12:43 | 16 |
|
Well, just for a quick look, i'd say you might have to place
some beams spanning the house to tie in the outside walls and
put some coller ties up higher....
^
/ \
/ \
/=====\
/ \
/---------\
| |
|
12.665 | Doable | NUBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Mon Jul 18 1994 15:35 | 33 |
| Our house has a family room added onto the main house. The family room
has its own A-roof, and the room has a cathedral ceiling. Here's how the
builder did it:
^
/X\
/ \
S/ \
/ \
/ \
/X X\
/ \
/ \
/ \
| |
| |
| |
|<-------21'------>| width is 16'
length
The X's indicate 4X6 beams running the width of the roof (in other words,
*into* the screen you're looking at). The rafters are 2X8's 16" on
center. There are jack studs under the beams, and hidden by the wall
(knotty pine, in our case). The drawing is slightly out of proportion;
the height is 15' (hey - what do you want for character cell?). We've
been in the house since 1976, have weathered all the heavy snow falls,
and there's no apparent problem.
Last week we had a contractor install two 30"X50" skylights where the S
is in the drawing. We're reveling in the difference in the light.
Art
|
12.666 | pardon my ignorance, but what are jack studs? | TPSYS::WEST | | Mon Jul 18 1994 16:14 | 0 |
12.667 | | WRKSYS::MORONEY | rearranger of rotating rust | Mon Jul 18 1994 16:41 | 17 |
| re .2:
Unless the roof was designed with the brute strength to withstand a snow load
(as apparently yours was) taking out the cross ties is asking for a snow
load to kick the walls out at the top with the roof kicking flat, or the
walls kicking out a little with the roof sagging in the middle.
I've seen the roof of a house kick out _with_ cross ties, in northern NY,
after an especially heavy storm (shoddy construction, not enough nails holding
the cross ties)
re .0:
Keep some sort of cross ties. Rustic looking beams can look good. You
probably don't need a lot, consult an architech.
-Mike
|
12.668 | Our experience | LANDO::OBRIEN | Give it a TRI | Mon Jul 18 1994 19:05 | 40 |
| > We might just take them out in the kitchen and bathroom, too (too open
> them up and add skylights.
We sort-of did this. We didn't do the entire ceiling/attic area above
the kitchen and bath, but made a much larger hole than just they
typical "tunnel-to-skylight" approach. What we did was take an apprx.
8'x8' cut-out area in the kitchen. On the exterior wall side, we went
straight up until we hit the rafters, then followed the rafters up the
slope of the roof for a few feet until we hit where the skylights were
to go. From the skylights, we made a 90 degree angle such that it
would intersect w/ the other end of the 8'x8' opening.....
Excuse the art but...
''
''
/'' '' rafter
/ *'' * skylights
/ * *'
/ * ''
/ ''
/ ''
=== |====== existing ceiling
In that area, we put 2 (31"x55 1/2") skylights.
There was a double 2x8 between the two skylights the two side rafters
were re-supported by adding a 2x8 to the 2x6 the entire length.
We did a similar design in the bathroom.
It has made the single BIGGEST difference in all of the renovations
that we have done.
Good luck.
-John
|
12.126 | Ceiling joint repair needed | VMSSPT::PAGLIARULO | | Tue Jul 19 1994 08:27 | 11 |
| My upstairs bathroom had a leak and stained an area on the kitchen
ceiling below. I can take care of the stain with no problem but the area that
was stained is right where the joint is taped and now the joint tape has
separated a little. The ceiling is textured but it is not the usual spray on
texturing. It looks like a skim coat of plaster that has had a swirl pattern
applied with a trowel or a rough sponge.
Is there a way to re-bond the tape without destroying the texture pattern on the
ceiling? Would something like a white glue work? I believe that if I can
rebond the tape I can hide the repair with a paint job.
George
|
12.595 | vapor problem? | MSBCS::A_HARRIS | | Mon Sep 19 1994 16:55 | 7 |
| My basement ceiling is insulated with fiberglass, paper side facing up.
I'm converting part of the basement to temporary office space, and we
really don't want fiberglass falling down on the systems. Will there be
a vapor problem if I staple plastic along the joists to keep bits of
insulation from falling down?
Thanks
|
12.596 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Sep 19 1994 17:45 | 6 |
| Yes, though you could probably eliminate a problem by slashing the plastic
at regular intervals.
What you want to avoid is two vapor barriers with anything in between.
Steve
|
12.597 | landscaping vinyl | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue Sep 20 1994 10:04 | 6 |
|
At a garden store you can pick up a roll of perforated landscaping
vinyl. It's the very light stuff, not the glass cloth, and is the same
material used to bag the new "non itch" insulation.
Colin
|
12.598 | | TEKVAX::KOPEC | You have left basic services | Tue Sep 20 1994 10:33 | 3 |
| Tyvek works fine too, but is kinda expensive..
...tom
|
12.599 | Boxing in ducts??? How? | NAPIER::HEALEY | M&ES, MRO4, 297-2426 | Wed Sep 28 1994 09:32 | 35 |
|
We will be finishing half the basement ceiling this winter,
probably with a drop ceiling. The walls are already done
so this is our next step. However, we have duct work that
drops down 10 inches in some sections and one 6 foot section
drops down 20 inches! One note mentioned boxing in duct
work.... how do you do that? Do you use sheetrock and 2x4's
or can you do this with the drop ceiling material?
Diagram:
X ductwork hangs down about 10 inches, Z ductwork hangs
down about 20 inches. X is 15 feet long, Z is 6 feet long.
-------------------------------------------------------
| ZZ |
| ZZ |
| XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXZZXXXXXXXXXX |
| XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXZZXXXXXXXXXX |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
-------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Karen
|
12.600 | headroom? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Wed Sep 28 1994 09:47 | 27 |
|
You can do it with the suspended ceiling, but it has to be
an additional two or three inches lower. You need that extra
room to insert the panels into the framework. If you can
spare 3" less headroom, then that's no problem.
There's not much difference in the amount of work required to
make a box in a suspended ceiling and the amount of work required
to use wood & sheetrock. I used 1x1 and 1x3 strapping to make the
frame, so it only took an extra inch (including sheetrock thickness)
off the headroom.
One thing I won't do next time: make the frame too tight around the
duct. Expansion has caused some sheetrock joints to crack. The frame
shouldn't touch the duct and there should be at least a quarter inch of
room all round.
Regards,
Colin
|
12.601 | How do you box in ductwork with suspended ceiling? | 11889::HEALEY | MRO3, 297-2426 | Wed Nov 02 1994 08:24 | 10 |
|
Can somebody describe in more detail how you would box in the ductwork
using suspended ceiling materials?
We just bought all the materials to do our ceiling but the best the
guy who sold us could suggest was to put the holders at two different
heights and then lay the ceiling tile at an angle. I can understand
how this would work but I'd much rather box them in. Any suggestions?
Karen
|
12.602 | treated it to match the wall panelling | WRKSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Nov 02 1994 12:57 | 8 |
| My predecessor covered the ductwork with contact paper that matches the
panelling in the basement, and then just ran the suspended ceiling up to
it on both sides. The duct work is over a built-in bar area, so this
looks OK. The ceiling would have been awfully low if any attempt had
been made to cover up the duct completely. (In the workshop area the
ceiling is open to the floor above, so the duct in there is exposed.)
/Charlotte
|
12.603 | Ideas? | 11889::HEALEY | MRO3, 297-2426 | Wed Nov 02 1994 13:02 | 8 |
|
The ductwork is insulated so the surface is soft. I don't think
contact paper will work, but that is a pretty good idea! Also, the
walls are white sheet rock, not paneling.
Any more ideas? We're tackling the project this weekend!
Karen
|
12.604 | Wood is good... | 19472::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Nov 02 1994 16:20 | 15 |
| Typical boxing ideas that I've seen involve building a frame of wooden
slats (1x2's or something along those lines, 2x4's would be overkill)
around the duct, and then nailing plywood or other wooden facing
over the frame. I suppose the ceiling panels could do in a pinch.
I've got some of the same problems and ideas for attacking it, but
I recently learned my wife is against the idea of a suspended ceiling
and favors a paneled look. Similar, but the panels are attached to
rigid tracks rather than the suspended t-bars. Of course, I ran the
sheetrock up the wall with ample space at the top to allow for the
fact they'll be covered by the suspended ceiling. Sigh....
Well, that will be the last step, I guess. Maybe I'll have someone else
do it ;-)
PeterT
|
12.42 | Which thickness drywall for ceilings? | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, UC1 | Mon Jan 16 1995 22:51 | 8 |
| Ok, I've gone through what appears to be all the applicable
topics on hanging a new ceiling with wallboard/blueboard,
but didn't see my the following question asked/answered .....
A friend of the family hangs drywall for a living. He suggested
hanging 5/8" material. However I notice Home Depot no longer
sells 5/8" stock (except for type X [ala fire-code]). Do most
people use 1/2" stock for ceilings?
|
12.43 | | FREBRD::POEGEL | Garry Poegel | Tue Jan 17 1995 09:08 | 9 |
|
>> <<< Note 12.42 by NETRIX::michaud "Jeff Michaud, UC1" >>>
>> -< Which thickness drywall for ceilings? >-
I think you can you 1/2" if the nailers are 16" OC. If they are
24", you MUST use 5/8". I used 1/2" on my ceiling with 16" OC
strapping and it looks fine 3 years later.
Garry
|
12.44 | | UPSAR::WALLACE | Vince Wallace | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:49 | 3 |
| I also used 1/2" drywall on 16" OC strapping. It's still fine
after 5 years.
|
12.45 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | Missed Woodstock -- *twice*! | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:59 | 3 |
|
Same contrruction, fifteen years, no problems.
|
12.669 | T&G pine ceiling ? | 5597::CALABRIA | | Thu Mar 09 1995 10:36 | 29 |
|
Hello,
I'm soon to be installing a tounge-n-groove
pine ceiling. It is cathedral style, and with no strapping,
plan to nail directly and run perpendicular to the rafters.
(headroom is critical) It's a small, short and long room.
There presently is no ceiling, each bay is button vented
under the soffit, with propervent running to a ridge vent
on top. presently there is kraft faced insulation from
soffit to ridge. (over the prop-r-vent) do I need any more
of a vapor barrier, or will the paper suffice.
I've been told I must apply the finish (light stain and poly)
before hanging the wood. I can see where it would be desirable
to apply the stain before hanging, but can imagine the cuts
standing out if the poly is applied before... ?? any
reason to stain the back ??
Can anyone offer any advice, shortcuts, gotcha's, or obvious
oversights with my plan ? between T&G, shiplap, and v-groove
are there any reasons not to use either in this application ?
I like to do things once.
Thanks,
JC
|
12.670 | Use an Air Nailer | MKOTS3::HARMAN | | Thu Mar 09 1995 12:24 | 17 |
| Hi,
I did a V groove ceiling about 7 years ago. Pre-stained all the boards
outside on a nice summer day. Nothing other than stain, my choice.
Used 1 1/2 inch wide moulding for edge trim, resolved any problems with
super accurate cuts. All boards run edge to edge (12'), no joints. Used
an air-nailer through the grove. Easiest job I ever did. What was also
nice was that my neighbor had given 3 sections of scaffolding. Oh, I
too just nailed to the cathedral ceiling rafters. Only had to hand set
2 nails.
Save yourself a lot of grief and agony, if you can, rent a
nailer,compressor and scaffolding if needed.
Call at 264-0370 if interested.
Marty
|
12.671 | 6" V-groove! | STAR::ALLISON | | Fri Mar 10 1995 07:36 | 13 |
| I also had a V groove ceiling done over the summer.. I pre-finished all
of the pine with 1 coat sealer and 2 coats satin poly (1 coat unseen
side). I wanted to get as little movement in the wood as possible. As
far as butting boards together, I have another suggestion. Try Veeing
them instead. You'll have to finish the joint later but that was easy
for me since it was not stained.
Would also second the staging and air nailer...
I've received lots of compliments on the natural looking pine. It's
a very light color. I couldn't imagine it stained darker.
_Gary
|
12.672 | A brief lesson about pine | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Fri Mar 10 1995 09:06 | 14 |
| .2 reminds me of another characteristic of pine: it darkens naturally all by
itself. We have a mostly pine house (white pine log home, with pine used for
all the trim boards, and the pins T&G ceiling. The first thing we did before
finishing was to sand all the flat surfaces, in order to get them as light as
possible before finishing. Whatever you use for finish will add some darkness
(except maybe water based poly). And over the years, the pine darkens, as most
woods do. At first it seems too bad, because you get used to that lovely white
color, but then you get used to it and learn to appreciate it.
We're not sure about the finish for the T&G. The satin poly is a bit too glossy
for our tastes. We're thinking about using MinWax Natural Wood Finish with no
poly...
Elaine
|
12.673 | | STAR::BALLISON | | Mon Mar 13 1995 11:26 | 10 |
| I've got T&G cedar throughout my house... One coat of Watco oil
seems to make a good finish. No need to worry about shrinkage if
you're using dry lumber to start with. Its well hidden in the grooves
if it does happen to shrink. Its best to stain/oil/poly before you put
the ceiling up. First its much easier and second, unless you keep your
hands real clean, you end up with finger prints on your ceiling which
you won't be much fun to sand.
Brian
|
12.674 | Ceiling beams, would like to remove | USCTR1::ESULLIVAN | | Tue Apr 18 1995 16:18 | 13 |
|
I have a cathedral ceiling in my living/dining area. There are exposed
beams that run from the living room wall to the dining room wall
(perpendicular to the length of the house and parallel to the floor).
I would like to remove them, but I don't know if the beams are structural
or decorative. How do I determine this? Do I ask the building inspector?
If I can remove these beams, could a licensed carpenter do it? I think
that the beams are solid, but I'll have to check. If they are solid,
they would be very heavy, and I would guess that they would have to be
cut into a couple pieces inorder to remove them?
Eleanor
|
12.675 | Probably structural.... | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Apr 18 1995 16:30 | 10 |
| If the beams form the bottom of a triange with the roof - which they
almost certainly do, in a cathedral ceiling - then they are almost
certainly structural. They keep the sides of the house from bowing
out from the pressure of the roof.
I think you're stuck with them. You could, if you wanted to, probably
replace them with something smaller than what is there, however, if
that would help your idea of aesthetics any. You could even replace
them with 3/4" diameter steel rods, for instance, but I don't know if
you would consider that an improvement or not....
|
12.676 | Guess I'm stuck with the beams | USCTR1::ESULLIVAN | | Tue Apr 18 1995 17:36 | 10 |
|
Yes, the beams form the base of a triangle with the roof. But there is
a family room behind the dining area, so the dining room wall is not an
exterior wall, but used to be. A family room was added at a later
date. I suppose this doesn't make a difference? The beams would most
likely be structural.
Thanks for the input.
ems
|
12.677 | Collar ties | STRATA::CASSIDY | Tim Cassidy, #365 | Wed Apr 19 1995 01:42 | 15 |
| I believe these beams are called `collar ties'. They prevent
the walls from getting pushed out and the ceiling from caving in.
It may be possible to create a partial cathedral ceiling and then
remove the collar ties (see illustration). It would be a very big
job.
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ ___________ \
/ / \ \
/ / \ \
/ / \ \
| | | |
|
12.678 | | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Wed Apr 19 1995 08:51 | 8 |
|
Sounds probable that the ceiling in this room was not originally a
cathedral ceiling. Frequently in converting a non-cathderal to a
cathedral they would do just what you describe: remove all the
original joists and replace with a few larger beams. In which case
(and based on your descriptions) these are structural.
- Mac
|
12.679 | coverup job | WRKSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Apr 19 1995 10:32 | 6 |
| Maybe you can paint them, or face them with some other kind of wood, to
make them look less obvious or more in keeping with your furnishings -
a lot of the fake ceiling beams are just hollow tubes faced with thin
pieces of what is supposed to look like barn boards.
/Charlotte
|
12.680 | | HANNAH::BECK | | Wed Apr 19 1995 10:33 | 12 |
| Alternate approach:
1. Install agro-lights above the beams
2. Cover them with a nice English ivy
and
3. Don't allow deer in the living room (our outside ivy got eaten
this winter)
|
12.681 | Add nice lighting to the beams. | TIEFLY::ANDERSEN | | Wed Apr 19 1995 12:26 | 11 |
|
The guy I bought my house from did just that, made the kitchen
and dining room ceilings cathedral. There are two structural
beams going across. What he did was put some track lighting
along the top of the beams directing down at different angles.
It looks real nice, especially since I put dimmers on them, it
gives a nice glow from up above.
Just a thought for you.
Chester
|
12.682 | Beam alternatives | USCTR1::ESULLIVAN | | Wed Apr 19 1995 13:50 | 4 |
|
Thanks for all the suggestions.
Eleanor
|
12.683 | cedar ceiling for bathroom | NETCAD::RITZ | Relax, it's only ones and zeros | Fri Sep 29 1995 16:57 | 7 |
| I'm partially redoing a basement bathroom, and I thought of using cedar
(1x4 TIG panelling.) Are there any drawbacks (other than cost) I'm not
aware of? Should I finish it? If so, with what?
Thanks,
John
|
12.684 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Mon Oct 02 1995 09:02 | 16 |
| > Are there any drawbacks (other than cost) I'm not
> aware of? Should I finish it? If so, with what?
My brother did this to a bathroom ceiling about 6-7 years ago and
loves it! It's naturally rot and mildew resistant so it works out
great in a damp environment like a bath.
For a slightly brighter look, make sure you get the white rather
than the red cedar. The look about the same when new, but the red
tends to darken more over time.
He didn't put any finish on his. That maybe part of the reason it
remains mildew resistant. A finish of polyurethane may seal the
wood and then allow mildew to grow on the poly finish.
Charly
|
12.685 | hoping for the best myself... | CONSLT::CORRIGAN | Hag at the churn | Tue Oct 03 1995 14:46 | 12 |
| I recently installed T&G cedar over a corner shower unit in
my basement bathroom. I did not apply any finish to the cedar.
I can't attest to it's longevity but I expect it to perform well
because of it's natural mildew/rot resistance.
I considered a finish on the wood to keep it from turning grey,
as the fence in the back yard has, but decided against it. The
possibility of the poly finish lifting before long in that wet
environment didn't sit well with me.
Its only an area of 40"x40" and I used the cedar sold for closet
lining.
Bob
|
12.686 | | STAR::BALLISON | | Wed Oct 04 1995 13:30 | 10 |
| I had a house with cedar ceilings through for 15 years... The
bathroom ceilings did have poly on them. There was never a peeling
problem. A little mildew did form after awhile, but it wipes off with
a damp sponge. I used regular 1x6 t&g boards... I'm not sure how the
thin stuff made for closet lining would fare. This all works great for
DIY. Its much easier to put up than sheetrock and it looks better too
(of course it costs a little more too).
Brian
|
12.687 | | NETCAD::RITZ | Relax, it's only ones and zeros | Fri Oct 06 1995 17:22 | 11 |
| I located the material I wanted after some searching; Moore's in Ayer has 4" red
cedar TIG for .60/ft. I need four to make up a foot (the 4" is nominal, it's really
3" of coverage) so that makes it about $2.40/s.f. Note this is not the aromatic
cedar used in closets, which is cheaper but not TIG and no bevels (which make it
look like v-groove paneling.)
I'll probably not finish it; I suspect the reason exterior installations turn grey
is UV exposure. I'm afraid of it weathering unevenly, though, over the shower.
We'll just have to see...
John
|
12.688 | | CONSLT::CORRIGAN | Hag at the churn | Mon Oct 09 1995 09:34 | 9 |
| The closet cedar I bought at Home Depot is TIG and has the beveled
edges to form a V-groove.
One drawback, though, is the presence of small knots in the wood.
Some of the knots had popped out leaving holes up to 3/8" dia.
Of course, these pieces are burried under the better grade boards
at the top of the package. I was able to cut most of these
imperfections off since they mosetly occured at the ends of boards.
Bob
|
12.695 | Repairing Plaster Bathroom ceiling | VMSSG::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Feb 09 1996 09:09 | 13 |
| My parents are in Florida and my siblings and I are doing a much needed
repair and facelift on their bathroom. I need to repair the ceiling which is
cement board covered with a skim coat of plaster. A section of the plaster has
separated from the cement board in what looks like will be about a 2 ft sq area
once I get all the loose stuff off. Once the ceiling is repaired it will be
painted. To do the repair I was going to use joint compound (since I've never
worked with plaster) but I don't know if that is an acceptable repair. Would
joint compound be ok? If I really should use plaster, what difference should I
be aware of when working with plaster as opposed to joint compound.
Thanks,
George
|
12.696 | pointer ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Fri Feb 09 1996 10:39 | 6 |
| re:last
You may want to check note 12.327 and the next few after it to see
if applies to your situation.
Ray
|
12.697 | | VMSSG::PAGLIARULO | | Fri Feb 09 1996 10:54 | 6 |
| Ray,
Thanks for the pointer but that note string relates to painting over
calcimine and textured ceilings - completely different from what I am asking.
George
|
12.698 | Use patch plaster as base coat | SMURF::GROSSO | Prevent & Prepare or Repent & Repair | Fri Feb 09 1996 12:21 | 9 |
|
I had great success with Durobond's patch plaster. I used that for the
bulk of the patch. On my first attempts I wasn't good enough to get it
smooth so I just worked on getting close and then I used joint compound
to get a smooth finish surface. I found the scratch coat of plaster
much more durable. It's been 8 years and no separating or cracking, so
it was a win for me.
-Bob
|
12.699 | saves time too | SMURF::GROSSO | Prevent & Prepare or Repent & Repair | Fri Feb 09 1996 12:22 | 4 |
| sorry, I should add that it saves a great deal of time. You can put the
plaster in 1/2 inch thick and it'll cure just fine. Joint compound would
all crack up and separate and take forever to dry. You'd spend days and
days doing thin little coats.
|
12.700 | | HYLNDR::BROWN | | Fri Feb 09 1996 12:47 | 8 |
|
also of note, pre-mixed joint compound may become soft in a moisture
situation like a bathroom. Mixing your own from drystock that is
available is less suseptible and is somewhat similar to plaster in
that is has a "working" time. Best bet seems to stick to a site
mixed compound wether joint compound or plaster.
My vote is for plaster, especially on a thick patch.
|
12.701 | What makes it ceiling paint? | ROTINY::ANDERSON | | Tue Mar 19 1996 12:31 | 6 |
|
What makes ceiling paint, *ceiling* paint? Is it different composition
than a paint you might use on a wall and, if so, why? Can it be tinted
to be any color? Thanks.
Walker
|
12.702 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Tue Mar 19 1996 13:05 | 23 |
| > What makes ceiling paint, *ceiling* paint?
Good question, to which I do not know the answer. My assumption
had always been that it was called ceiling paint because it was
supposed to be a "purer white" than the standard white bases
(because ceilings are usually pure white).
> Is it different composition than a paint you might use on a wall and,
> if so, why?
This could be the answer. Maybe due to ceilings being a horizontal
surface it has a stronger bond with the surface to resist a stronger
pull from gravity? Or it could be due to the fact that heat rises,
that the paint is formulated differently?
> Can it be tinted to be any color?
This I believe I do know the answer to. It depends on the brand
of paint, just like any other paint. Some cheap paints can't be
tinted, but most paints (including ceiling) paints can be.
FWIW, I've used Behr Pure White (latex) and it is indeed one of the
purest whites I've seen (and am happy with it).
|
12.703 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Mar 19 1996 13:56 | 8 |
|
Ceiling paint is much more opaque and goes on thicker. I had covered
a yellow/brown water stain with just one coat and I was able to cover
up the wood color of the woodwork with just one coat. It is like
White-Out!
Eva
|
12.704 | thick, sticky paint | WRKSYS::RICHARDSON | | Tue Mar 19 1996 14:15 | 12 |
| Ceiling paint is thicker and is not supposed to drip - it even mostly
*doesn't* drip, although clumsy oafs like me can still manage to splatter
it around some when painting a textured ceiling. Speaking of which,
since we fixed the small leaks around the supports for the solar hot
water system last fall right before the weather turned horrible, I
suppose I have to schedule time to repaint the ceiling of the room
underneath... I kinda like painting, but I am not the most careful
painter there ever was, especially after I get tired working over my
head doing ceilings. (I've already got the paint, but the round tuit
has been a bit elusive lately!)
/Charlotte
|
12.705 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Mar 19 1996 14:58 | 7 |
| GOOD ceiling paint is thicker and doesn't drip. BAD ceiling paint is thin and
drips/spatters readily. I've used both.
Ceiling paints also tend to be offered in special "shades" of white, including
a very bright white which you don't typically see in wall paints.
Steve
|
12.706 | | WRKSYS::MACKAY_E | | Tue Mar 19 1996 16:44 | 8 |
|
Doesn't drip? It depends how much one slops on, no? After a certain
point, gravity takes over ... I used Benjamin Moore (no idea if it is
*good* or *bad* ceiling paint) and managed to make a mess. Thanks Steve,
I now have an educated excuse ;-)
Eva
|
12.707 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Tue Mar 19 1996 18:00 | 6 |
| > Ceiling paints also tend to be offered in special "shades" of white, including
> a very bright white which you don't typically see in wall paints.
fwiw, "very bright white" is what Behr calls "Pure White". I
think it also comes in a Gloss if you really a bright (and
shiney :-) room :-)
|
12.708 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Mar 19 1996 20:18 | 4 |
| I also use Moore paints - the stuff I bought says its for walls and
ceilings.
Steve
|
12.709 | Ultra Pure White | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Wed Mar 20 1996 08:41 | 7 |
|
re: .707
Behr's whitest white is called "Ultra Pure White".
- Mac
|
12.710 | Moore's Ceiling White is Great | NEMAIL::GREENBERG | | Wed Mar 20 1996 17:15 | 6 |
| I just used Moore's Ceiling White and it was great. No mess. Dries
super fast. You can do a second coat in about an hour. Looks great and
covers well.
Art
|
12.711 | | BIGQ::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Thu Mar 21 1996 10:03 | 6 |
|
Ceiling paint, to my knowledge, can be tinted to give a hue to
the room. Over 35 years ago, my father tinted the ceiling paint
pinkish to give a rosey glow to my bedroom.
|
12.712 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Mar 21 1996 11:56 | 4 |
| It will say on the paint can whether or not tinting is possible. I have seen
some paints which say not to tint them.
Steve
|
12.713 | Love that Behr paint. | CONLON::ANDERSEN | | Tue Mar 26 1996 12:50 | 12 |
| Regarding the Behr Ultra Pure White, which is the correct name, is made
by a California company and is the whitest white you can buy, so I was
told. It's also the only paint I ever use, except for ceiling I use
America's finest ceiling paint.
Incidently, after buying the aforementioned ceiling paint at Depot I
asked the woman at the paint counter to shake it for me and she told
me that you don't have to shake ceiling paint. Well this may be true
but I asked her to humor me and SHAKE IT ANYWAY.
Thanks
|
12.714 | | SHRCTR::PJOHNSON | aut disce, aut discede | Tue Mar 26 1996 16:16 | 8 |
| I did look for mold and bath in the title of 12.* ...
Is there paint that has something in it to keep bathroom ceilings from
getting a little moldy due to dampness? Or is there a honkin' bathroom
exhaust fan that will blow more than enough air to put out a birthday
candle?
Pete
|
12.715 | | EVMS::MORONEY | while (!asleep) sheep++; | Tue Mar 26 1996 16:30 | 3 |
| I've seen additives for paint sold that claim to inhibit mold growth.
I have no idea how well they work.
|
12.716 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Mar 26 1996 16:43 | 4 |
| There are paints made for high-humidity applications that resist mildew (which
I think is what you are referring to). Most major brands have them now.
Steve
|
12.717 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Tue Mar 26 1996 18:50 | 12 |
| > There are paints made for high-humidity applications that resist mildew (which
> I think is what you are referring to). Most major brands have them now.
I believe they are usually labeled in large print on the can
"Kitchen & Bath" :-)
Though there are some non-K&B flavors that in small print claim to
also be mildew resistant.
In the bath I had recently done I also used a "gloss" flavor of
the K&B because some (including me :-) believe a gloss finish
better resists moisture (and hence resist mildew).
|
12.718 | restoring a ceiling medallion | ROCK::ANDERSON | | Mon Feb 10 1997 12:08 | 25 |
|
I recently put in a new ceiling underneath the old ceiling in my old house in
a room that had a plaster medallion and light fixture hanging from it.
Basically, the weight of the medallion was pulling down the old ceiling. I
asked the plasterers to preserve the medallion and as they were taking it
down, the ceiling for several feet around it came crashing down. They then
put up blueboard and a skim coat over the entire ceiling (after leveling off
the old ceiling where large chunks had come down).
Anyway, to get to the point, I'd now like to put the old medallion up if I
can. My first step would be to scrape or chisel the plaster from the old
ceiling off the back side of the medallion but I don't want to even bother
doing that if it can't or shouldn't be reattached. I realize that they now
make medallions out of lighter materials but my preference is to restore the
old one.
Can it be done? How should it be attached? Will attaching it to the skim
coat work? With some bolts (hidden underneath the light fixture)? Will
it likely just pull down ceiling again?
Any advice or tips welcome.
Thanks.
Walker
|
12.719 | weight and size | CPEEDY::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Mon Feb 10 1997 13:16 | 5 |
|
re ceiling medallion:
what does it weigh?
how big is it?
|
12.720 | | FABSIX::B_GAULIN | | Wed Mar 05 1997 11:50 | 9 |
| When the upstairs apartment was remodeled, the contractor used joint
compound over an exsisting finished ceiling. Over time the compound
cracked and fell in areas. There is nothing wrong with the ceiling as
a whole and I hate to tear it down. I was thinking of putting up new
blueboard. There are areas of the ceiling that are slanted so my
question is this. How do match the point where the new blueboard will
meet the wall?? Any other suggestion would be appreciated.
Brian
|