T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
166.1 | | BACH::GREEK | | Fri Nov 15 1985 13:38 | 6 |
| I'm no expert at all on chimneys. I'd be scared to do it myself, but
I do have one comment. Sheet metal seems awful thin and flimsy for a
flue. I'd use tile.
- Paul
|
166.2 | | ELUDOM::CLARK | | Fri Nov 15 1985 15:00 | 16 |
| If the flues are straight and large enough, an experienced mason can install
a tile liner (in sections) using a device that lowers the sections from the
top of the chimney.
Another techinque I've heard of involves putting a balloon-like device down
the chimney, pouring a morter-like lining material around the balloon,
waiting for the material to harden, and then removing the balloon.
The chimney that we wanted to use in our old house for a wood stove was in
such poor shape (e.g., creosote leaks though old patches) that we had the
old chimney torn down and replaced with a new, lined chimney. We felt that
the cost (about $1200 in 1979) was a worthwhile investment in our house,
especially when the cost of a metal liner (kludge) was several hundred dollars
(and a lot of hassle).
-- Ward
|
166.3 | | SWATT::BAUMGART | | Fri Nov 15 1985 15:20 | 6 |
| I recently saw in a CONSOLIDATED DUTCHWEST ( Plymouth, MA? ) catalog a metal
liner that you can slip down your chimney. You can get a copy of the catalog
by filling out the post-paid reply card that accompanies their ad. The ad
can be found in many of the DIY or Woodworking magazines.
- Bruce -
|
166.4 | | LAUREL::DICKENSON | | Fri Nov 22 1985 12:42 | 12 |
| I had a similar problem, old house, mortar falling out
from between the bricks.
Royal Chimney Sweep, Merrimack, NH, installed a stainless
steel liner. Guaranteed for ten years.
We've used it for two heating seasons with no problems.
They also install concrete and ceramic liners
Bill D.
|
166.5 | | HEFTY::FRANCISCO | | Fri Nov 22 1985 14:23 | 11 |
| I have an old center chimney cape-three fire places
plus BEE HIVE OVEN. Had the whole thing relined
using "Balloon" (formers) method mentioned in note
4.2. The BIG plus using this method is that it
strengthens the chimney by filling any void between
the bricks or old flue liner. Lots of other info
too numerous to mention here. Send mail to
SPMFG1::FRANCISCO
or call 243-2472
|
166.6 | | POTTER::JKLINKENBERG | | Wed Dec 18 1985 19:04 | 17 |
| RE: Brick Chimney rebuild /lining options
We've been living in our (first-owned, built ca.1920) house for 1+half
years, taking it very slowly in the repairs & improvements Dept.
One of the most major ($) projects so far was getting our Tower-of-Pisa
chimney rebuilt from the roof up. (BTW, estimates ranged from $200 to over
$700... we didn't go with the lowest bid 'cause the guy couldn't/wouldn't
give us names of any people he'd done masonry work for)
At the time (several weeks before GLORIA, timely) we asked about getting
it lined. they told us it wouldn't do any good to just get the top lined,
and gave us to understand that they weren't too interested in doing the
whole thing, and we shouldn't be either...
? WHEN should one RE-line a chimney? Is there a fire/other hazard to having
an old chimney without a flue liner?
|
166.7 | | SPEEDY::CLARK | | Wed Dec 18 1985 23:12 | 12 |
| RE: why line a chimney
If you have a chimney fire in an unlined chimney, you run the real risk of
having the chimney crack, giving the fire access to whatever combustible
material surrounds the crack. This can mean a very serious house fire
rather than a scary, but less serious chimney fire.
Chimney fire are usually only a threat in chimneys fed by an air-tight
wood stove. Fireplaces, leaking wood stoves, coal stoves and oil/gas
furnaces don't present a problem.
-- Ward
|
166.8 | | TONTO::EARLY | | Thu Dec 19 1985 14:46 | 51 |
| re: .6 & Esp. .7
re: Reasons for lining an old chimney :^)
Pardon my naivete, but one of my references is the OHJ (constantly
referenced by others). The situation, as I understand it, is this.
I also knew a person who is on the Mont Vernon volunteer fire department,
who relished telling about harrowing chimney fire stories.
Old houses often had structural members passing through the chimney walls,
forming part of the chimney structure as well. When a fire does occur, these
often exposed beams can ignite, and carry the fire to outside the chimney,
often hidden behind walls and other obscure places.
The chief cause of chimney fires is an accumulation of resins in the
chimney, caused by burning too cool to carry away the residues; green wood;
soft, high resinous woods like pine.
There are burning techniques to reduce these resins, and even to clean out
small accumulations.
The reasons to reline a chimney aren't base on age, but rather the condition
of the chimney (mortar, lost bricks, etc) which provide a void (holes) through
the chimney structure.
I lived in an older home in Nashua (ca. 1900), and the exterior of the
chimney (exposed in the attic) was coated with black resin from leaks
through the chimney.
From my ol' buddy in the fire dep't; I understand that if a chimney fire
occurs, a superheated chimney can ignite this resin on the OUTSIDE of the
chimney, thereby causing and intense house fire (which may or may not be
easily detected, due to the roaring chimney fire in progress).
If anyone has information to the contrary of what I have just submitted,
I would like to see (read, know) the references so I can look it up
for myself, and set my freinds straight.
Bob_the_hiker :^)
BTW - Gas furnaces and devices should not share the same chimney with
a live flame device, such as wood stove. THe reason being that the gas
furnace vents its burner to the chimney. So if there's a problem
with gas seeping out, and up the chimney; there's a potential bomb
situation.
This is what I got from the Medford Fire Department when they learned my
mother had a wood stove connected to the gas furnace chimney.
|
166.9 | | HARPO::B_HENRY | | Fri Dec 20 1985 16:01 | 37 |
| I have been a member of the fire department in my town for 12 years and
my father was a member for 23 years before that. I could use up all
the disk space on this system with stories about chimney fires, some
which burned the house as well. In fact my fathers house burned about
12 years ago (yes, it had something to do with my joining the department)
and the cause was a crack in the fireplace. Carbon had built up in the
crack and that night we had a good fire going and evidently the carbon,
which starts to glow and will flow when very hot, got into the wall.
$23K structural damage (1975). There are many house fires started by
a crack in the chimney, lined or unlined. If you burn wood or coal, an
inspection periodicaly of the chimney is a must.
As for chimney liners, be careful because an improperly lined chimney
can give you a real false sense of security. If the linning is done by
lowering liner sections down, the joint between sections must be sealed
right or, as you may guess, you have another crack. Deposits from the
smoke can build up and if heated, as in the carbon, start to flow.
If there are cracks in the outer shell of the chimney, the over the course
of a few years you could get a path of the stuff that could be the mechanism
to burn you house.
Many people may have a chimney fire and not know it. We have pulled up
to a house, started to place ladders and have had an irate owner come
out wanting to know why he had people walking on his roof. Some chimeny
fires go out by themselves. In the old days, people let a chimney fire
run its course and only made sure that the sparks didnt start a roof or
barn fire. The risk of course is the chimney may have a fault. If you
read histories of small towns, house fires were common and the chimney
was a common source.
Something else, in an old hose that was built with a stove pipe holes in
the chimney for every room, many people will block of most off these when
renovating a house. This was the case two years ago. Chimeny fire heated
up the metal plug blocking one of these holes, melted the plug and totaled
the house. Owner was slow to call in the chimney fire because it was only
a chimney fire.
bill
|
166.32 | CU report on Woodstoves, Chimneys | TONTO::EARLY | | Thu Jan 02 1986 08:08 | 21 |
| While there are several notes about all these subjects;
I just want to interject a new note about another source of information.
The October issue of COnsumers Reports has several comprehensive articles
about : Woodstoves, Chimney fires, Rebuilding/Relining chimneys,
woodstove catylytic converters (sparse), Household Air pollution, Heat Pumps,
and Heat Exchangers (for woodstoves).
If you can't find a copy in yur local library, then try another library.
Generally the CD don't circulate, anyway, but you might be able to copy
the stuff you're interested in.
Of particular note, is that once a chimney fire starts, the FLue pipe to
the top of the chimney rises to about 1500 - 1700 degrees fahrenheit.
They also have a LIST of chimney relining materials, contractors, and
sources.
The woodstove section is their comparative analysis as with other
types of products. (A is better than B because of reasons a,c,f,g,i) etc.
|
166.438 | Fireplace leaking rain | KIRK::GOSSELIN | | Mon Dec 22 1986 13:10 | 10 |
| During major rain storms like one week ago the front face of my
fire place gets wet and drips on the fireplace doors. I had that
happen once before during our hurricane last winter. I thought I
corrected it by building up cement against the chimney liner at
the top of the chimney so water would drain away from the liner.
Could there be that much rain falling into the chimney to cause
that. Is my best bet to get one of those hoods for the top of the
chimney??
any ideas,
Ed
|
166.439 | | VINO::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Mon Dec 22 1986 13:43 | 4 |
|
I think I would check the flashing where the chimney meets the roof,
and then the caulking between the chimney and the siding. Sounds
more like rain trickling down the outside than the inside.
|
166.440 | | KIRK::GOSSELIN | | Wed Dec 24 1986 10:57 | 4 |
| I feel my roof flashing is ok! but I know that my vinyl siding buts
up against the brick and there is know caulking there. Thanks I
will have to give it a try.
Ed
|
166.441 | check the chimney cap | MSEE::SYLVAIN | | Wed Dec 24 1986 12:37 | 8 |
|
Sometime it is caused by cracks in the mortar that cap the top of the
chimney. The water can come down along the outside of the liners but
inside the bricks. It is pretty simple to seal the crack, of course
this could be a tough job if you have one of those long chimney
that seem to hang up in the air.
|
166.442 | tried it! | KIRK::GOSSELIN | | Wed Dec 24 1986 13:06 | 6 |
| I had put additional cement at the chimney cap to pitch the water
away from the liner after the first leak after last years hurricane.
It only happens after a driving rain storm. The all day type of
storm. Caulking between the chimney and the siding sounds like a
good idea. Is it too cold for silicon caulking at this time of year?
Ed
|
166.443 | FYI | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Wed Dec 24 1986 13:09 | 6 |
| Re: .3
Just in case anyone is going to undergo the task. Mortar should not
be used to cap a chimney! Portland cement is normally used.
Steve
|
166.444 | | SEINE::CJOHNSON | My heart belongs to Daddy! | Mon Jan 19 1987 07:45 | 11 |
| RE: Is it too old to use Silicone?
The temperature at which it is too cold to use Silicone is when
you are outside and you speak something and the words crystalize
in mid-air and crash to the ground. Other than this it's ok. ;)
By Silicone, I assume you mean GE Silicone II [Is there anything
else?] which does remain workable/plyable to -40 degrees or some
such ridiculous temperature.
Charlie
|
166.33 | Blocked chimney. Solutions?? | PLANET::DIGIORGIO | He who proposes, does | Mon Jan 19 1987 11:12 | 39 |
|
Advise needed...my chimney seems to be blocked.
For the second time in three weeks, I attempted to light a fire
in the wood stove in my basement -- and the smoke would not draft.
Background:
The house is 9 months old. Chimney is brick, clay flue lined. Three
flues; 1 for the oil fired furnace, 1 for a first floor fireplace,
and 1 for the stove in the basement.
I installed the stove 7 or 8 months ago; have used it a dozen times
(at most); and it (had) drafted excellent. In the dozen or so uses,
I have burned scrap lumber (pine/oak/particle board), and a few pine and
oak 5-7" diameter logs. I've generally burned the stove hot for
short (4 to 6 hour) periods; sufficient to heat my workshop.
Two weekends ago, I lit a fire, and ended up using a fire extinguisher
to kill the fire as the smoke backed-up. Yesterday, after cleaning
the extinguisher residue in the stove, I attempted to burn a single
sheet of newspaper to check the draft, and it backed up again.
There doesn't appear to be snow covering the top of the chimney.
I have checked the first floor fireplace both visually (looking-up
the firebox) and by burning an open fire this past Saturday and it
drafts/burns fine.
My thoughts are;
A piece of snow/ice dropped down the chimney and is blocking the flue;
A dead animal (at least 8" in diameter??) is stuck in the flue;
or ????
Short of climbing up on the roof (it's a tall 2 story colonial),
can anyone offer any ideas on how I can check for WHATS blocking
the flue and HOW to remove/melt the problem?
Thanks, Jim.
|
166.34 | use a mirror | MARY::ESONIS | What now? | Mon Jan 19 1987 11:49 | 9 |
|
in order to check for blockage, get a small mirror and insert it in
the clean-out door at the bottom of the flue, or remove the stovepipe
and insert the mirror through the thimble. if the flu is open/clear
you should be able to see the sky by holding the mirror at the correct
angle.
|
166.35 | ...done with mirrors... | PLANET::DIGIORGIO | He who proposes, does | Mon Jan 19 1987 12:08 | 9 |
| Thanks for the fast response.
As I supervised the Chimney construction, I know the basement flue
tapers to the right about 10 - 12 feet up. The other 2 flues go
straight-up.
Think I'll be able to see sky (light) even with the sharp bend??
|
166.36 | What, no draft? | DRUID::CHACE | | Mon Jan 19 1987 12:52 | 17 |
| I wouldn't be surprised if you have no blockage at all. In cold
weather it is very common to have a downdraft in an otherwise unused
flue. (the air in it is cold and thus wants to sink)
Your problem has happened to me. You merely have to get a draft
started and then it will continue ok. Start by opening a nearby window
or door a few inches, and then try to create a draft by igniting
some loosely rolled newspaper and putting it as far into the fluepipe
as possible. Have your fire ready to light and as soon as the draft
starts, light the main fire. Then you can close the door or window.
One thing that can contribute to this problem is a long (over 2')
horizontal run of pipe out of the stove.
One way that may help to minimize the problem is to install a chimney
cap of the type that is meant to enhance the draft.
Hope this helps
Kenny
|
166.37 | Give your furnace air | NACHO::DIGRAZIA | | Mon Jan 19 1987 13:05 | 9 |
|
If your furnace is running when the stove refuses to
draft, it could be that the furnace is drawing combustion air
down the stove's flue. Opening a window or some other vent path
for the furnace ought to help.
Have you heard the Northwoods story about the stove that
drew so well, it shot everything up the flue, including
the farmer's dog, the farmer, and finally itself, inside-out?
|
166.38 | Santa Claus stuck? | PLANET::DIGIORGIO | He who proposes, does | Mon Jan 19 1987 15:12 | 10 |
| Re: 3; I've heard of cold air in the flue affecting draft however,
I've used the stove on similarly cold days and no problem. Also,
if settling of cold air is the problem, why haven't I had any problems
with the 1st floor fireplace?
Re: 4; Nope. The furnace was not running. Also, I have my inside
(exterior steel) basement door off...so there's plenty of draft
sneaking through the bulkhead.
|
166.39 | check the draft | MORGAN::HO | | Mon Jan 19 1987 17:45 | 18 |
| I second .3 opinion on downdrafts. Stove design as well as room
configuration and local topography can cause downdrafts. I've had
2 woodstoves in my kitchen. The first model, a Franklin type, never
was affected by downdrafts no matter how cold the weather. Our
new one with its deeper fire box almost always requires pre-warming
of the chimney with the lighted newspaper roll.
One easy way to see if you have a downdraft is to open the stove
door and look inside. If there's downdraft, you'll feel the cold
air on your face. Or, light a match and hold it inside near the
flu damper. Watch which way the flame blows.
If you want to try pre-warming the flu, I've found that standing
a roll of newspaper vertically in the flu before lighting it works
effectively.
Re your fireplace. I've also never encountered a draft problem
in my fireplace which is on the opposite end of the kichen.
|
166.445 | Electrically warmed caulk gun, anyone? | CAM1::BLESSLEY | Life's too short for boring food | Mon Jan 19 1987 17:47 | 10 |
| I read somewhere (here, probably...) that +40 is the optimum temperature to
caulk -- lower than that it might not stick (even if it is pliable), above that
the joint you're caulking won't have expanded as much. Good silicon caulk (like
the aforementioned GE) will "go with the flow" when a joint expands; the cheap
stuff is apt to crack. By caulking at 40ish, the gap is already at its widest,
and may compress the caulk, but won't pull it apart.
At least that's the theory :-)
-scott
|
166.40 | it's the glue (I think) | EXODUS::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Jan 20 1987 12:11 | 13 |
| particle board!!! that's a no-no (at least is was for me!).
I burned a bunch in my fireplace and I guess all that glue vaporizing
and hitting the cold air near the chimney top condensed and formed an
actual seal in the flue. It wasn't until a couple of week later when
the snow on the roof melted that I went up there and cleared it out with
my handy-dandy chimney sweeping kit. If heights/roofs don't freak you
out, for around $40 you can buy everything you need to sweep your own
chimney at Spags. It pays for itself the first time and then you never
have to worry about when to sweep next. Just wait for a nice day and in
around 10 minutes you'll have a nice clean chimney.
-mark
|
166.41 | | PLANET::DIGIORGIO | He who proposes, does | Mon Jan 26 1987 13:01 | 16 |
|
Thanks for all the good advice!! I checked my chimney this weekend
using the "mirror thru the clean-out door" trick, and there is plenty
of daylight. Opening the clean-out door, the problem became obvious...
seems I've got a very strong cold breeze settling in the flue. Open
the stove door (or chimney clean-out) and the breeze hits you in the face.
I tried using newspaper in the flue as a prewarm, but the downdraft is
too strong, (the colder the outside temperature, the worse the problem).
Has anyone had any experience with those electric "fan-in-flue-pipe"
do-hickies they sell to create draft?
Jim.
|
166.42 | Your hot air is going out somewhere else... | ALIEN::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Jan 26 1987 15:04 | 12 |
| See if you can find out where the air that is rushing down the chimney is
going. First, check to see if you get the downdraft only when your furnace is
running, or all the time. Assuming that it's all the time, look for major air
leaks in the house, particularly on the upper floors. We had exactly the same
problem at my parents' house, and it was a fairly tight, new construction
house. We finally figured that the only place it could be going was up through
the pull-down stairway to the attic. We bought a sheet of 1" beadboard
insulation, and made a tight-fitting cap to cover the stairway opening. Bingo!
The cold draft down the chimney was gone. To say nothing of the fact that a
major heat loss was stopped up.
Paul
|
166.43 | Chimney Cap? | NUWAVE::SUNG | Hoopbusters - de agony of de feet | Tue Jan 27 1987 08:54 | 4 |
| Chimney caps are available which causes an updraft when the wind
blows across it.
-al
|
166.446 | Recent Issue | JETSAM::NORRIS | What is it, Miss Pfeffernuss? | Fri Feb 06 1987 13:23 | 6 |
| I need to do some work around the chimney, one of things to do is
some pointing work. I was told that OHJ has an article on chimney
pointing, could someone supply me with a copy to look at? Thanks.
Ed
|
166.447 | Cutting existing flue liner | AGNT99::STLAURENT | | Thu Feb 12 1987 15:22 | 11 |
| Here's my problem: I need to cut a 6" dia. hole into an existing
flue-liner. Is there any other way to accomplish this other than a series
of holes using a masonary bit? This takes too much time and I'm afraid of
cracking the liner.
I'm hoping for maybe some type of file or blade that would fit a saws-all
or something that will fit in there.
And one more question I have is after this hole is roughened out
is a mortar seal needed between the stove pipe and the flue-liner?
All help appreciated,
Jim
|
166.448 | carbide works great. | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | | Sat Feb 14 1987 07:24 | 8 |
| You may want to try one of the carbide grit blades availible
for saws-all they work very well on terracotta drain tiles.
Cutting is slow and creates alot of heat so go slow and take your
time to prevent the blade from over heating and failing too soon
or use a low speed if you have it.
-j
|
166.44 | Insulating an exterior chimney | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Feb 20 1987 08:33 | 16 |
| There was a discussion not long ago about putting a fireplace on an outside
wall, but I couldn't find it. I looked through masonry keyworded notes, and
basement keyworded notes, but no luck. Oh well. That's how we manage to have
over 800 topics in here.
So. Suppose you are going to add a fireplace to an outside wall. You have no
option of putting it in an interior location. Is there any way to insulate it?
For example, isn't vermiculite just basically fluffed minerals? Would it
withstand the high heat of a chimney interior? If it won't, is there anything
that will? If it would, you could fill the interior chimney space between the
firebox and the outside wall with it, and it would make a very significant
difference in the amount of heat lost.
Thoughts?
Paul
|
166.45 | you should always be able to make the chimney 'interior' | YODA::BARANSKI | Searching for Lowell Apartmentmates... | Fri Feb 20 1987 11:01 | 9 |
| I would think that if you were going to add a chimney, you would insulate it
such that the chimney was inside your house, insulkation wise...
After all, you can't get away from heating the fireplace/chimney, so it might
as well be inside, where you want the heat...
Is this what you're doing?
Jim.
|
166.46 | But if you CAN'T put it on an inside wall... | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Feb 20 1987 11:44 | 29 |
| OK, the case is this: the chimney in question is for the hall at our church.
The hall is your basic cinderblock building, and as such is not as homey as one
could ask for. One of the suggestions is to add a fireplace along one wall.
There is simply nowhere to put a fireplace such that it is on an interior wall.
I've been looking into the possibility of putting this thing in this summer.
Since you ask, this is what I've been thinking of:
(looking down)
_____________________________________________
|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|
| | This space filled with insulation | |
|_| ___________________________________ |_|
| | |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___| | | |
|_| | | Air space for heating vents |_| |_|
| | |_| _______________ | | | |
|_| | | /\__|___|___|__ \ |_| |_|
________________| | |_| / / \ \ | | | |________________
existing| wall |_| | | /\/ Rumford \/\ |_| |_| |
________|_______| |__|_|___/ / Fireplace \ \___|_|__| |________|_______
|_|___|___|_/ \_|___|___|_|
The only added costs are for the extra wall inside the chimney, which can use
cheap block or something, and the cost of the insulation itself. I don't even
think it will get that hot, given that there's the air space between it and the
firebox. What do you think?
Paul
|
166.47 | Put it inside the wall, not through the wall | CACHE::WHALEN | Some people actually like fruit cake | Fri Feb 20 1987 12:16 | 24 |
| Instead of putting the fireplace through the existing wall, why
don't you put it just inside of the wall? This shouldn't take much
more space, and should have the same utility of having it on an
interior wall. i.e. Change your picture to look like this:
_____________________________________________________________________________
existing| wall | | | | | | |
________|________|________|________|________|________|________|________|_____
|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___| |
| | Air space for heating vents |_|
|_| _______________ | |
| | /\__|___|___|__ \ |_|
|_| / / \ \ | |
| | /\/ Rumford \/\ |_|
|_|___/ / Fireplace \ \___|_|
|____|_/ \_|____|
Rich
|
166.48 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Feb 20 1987 14:04 | 10 |
| > Put it inside the wall, not through the wall
Well, I hadn't thought of that, and it's a good idea, but I don't think it will
fly. The intrusion of the chimney into the room would be a problem. It would
be fine when the ropom is used as a large hall, but there are partitions to
divide the room into smaller rooms, and the room that the chimney was in would
be quite crowded. Plus, It will make going through the roof much more
difficult. Does anyone know of any reason why the vermiculite idea won't work?
Paul
|
166.49 | And the nominees are... | JOET::JOET | Deatht�ngue lives! | Sat Feb 21 1987 08:17 | 4 |
| I hereby nominate 817.2 (and .3 by way of plagiarism) for the "Best
Descriptive Picture in HOME_WORK Award (VTxxx category)" for 1987.
-joet
|
166.50 | vermiculite's ok... | HENRY8::ESONIS | What now? | Sat Feb 21 1987 14:56 | 15 |
|
the vermiculite should work ok. when i had cracked tiles in
my exterior wood stove chimney in the middle of last winter, i had
the chimney relined with a stainless steel flue... the contracter
filled the space between the stainless steel and the tiles with
vermiculite, and i've seen no problem until just a week ago, when
i had a small chimney fire. the stack thermometer on the inside
pipe reached 900+ degrees before i got the fire out....when i looked
through the clean-out door outside, i could see that some of the
vermiculite had melted... i doubt that you'd generate that kind
of temperature in a fireplace, so your plan should work ok....
ske
|
166.51 | Try testing stuff. | HOMBRE::DIGRAZIA | | Sun Feb 22 1987 01:01 | 18 |
|
I once had an attic insulated with a variety of insulations:
rock wool, fiberglas flakes, fiberglas blanket, and what I
think was vermiculite. Is vermiculite the funny little
flakes that look like mica, about 1/4" across? This stuff
was dark, mostly blackish-grey.
I tested some of the little flakes with a propane torch to see
whether they would burn. They would glow red while in the flame,
but show no reaction once I removed the flame. If it was
vermiculite, it doesn't jibe with .6's seeing some melted stuff
at what ought to have been cooler than a propane flame.
I don't remember trying to ignite the fiberglas flakes.
Anyhow, if you can get a sample of stuff, try to burn it.
Regards.
|
166.52 | high tech? | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Tue Feb 24 1987 14:09 | 10 |
|
I think I remember seeing an article that talked about the
"new safe materials" for chimneys and there was something
mentioned about insulation for between the flue and the
chimney block. Would this be what you are looking for?
I could dig up the article and send you a copy. Might
be expensive stuff tho...
-gary
|
166.53 | I can always decide not to buy it | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Feb 24 1987 16:14 | 4 |
| Yes, Please, I'd love a copy of the article.
Thanks
Paul
|
166.54 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | | Wed Feb 25 1987 00:55 | 3 |
| Vermiculite is Mica that has been expanded by the use of steam.
Really soaks up the water..
|
166.55 | | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Wed Feb 25 1987 11:45 | 10 |
| re < Note 817.9 by BEING::WEISS "Trade freedom for security-lose both" >
-< I can always decide not to buy it >-
> Yes, Please, I'd love a copy of the article.
I'll fire you off a copy tomorrow....
-gary
|
166.56 | | PAXVAX::NAYLOR | Mark E. Naylor | Wed Feb 25 1987 22:53 | 7 |
| When I built an exterior chimney a few years ago, the building
inspector recommended I insulate the space between the liner and
chimney block with perlite.
Mark
|
166.57 | ..by request..:-) | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Fri Mar 06 1987 13:09 | 49 |
|
Sorry for not getting around to this til now. (Gotta work
sometimes) The following is a brief summary on the article
I mentioned -.?.
"The World's Toughest Chimneys" by David Lyle, published in
the 1986/87 issue of "Woodheat" magazine.
David Lyle is the author of "The Book of Masonry Stoves" and
owner of The Heating Research Co. of Acworth, NH. He's also
a volunteer fireman who writes with the experience of extinguishing
many a chimney fire.
He claims that basically american masonry chimneys are poorly
designed when it comes to being used for the new airtight and
catalytic stoves. During a chimney fire the will often be temps
of 2000 deg F or higher. This can cause all kinds of problems.
Materials nearby may get hot and catch fire, creasoste can leak
through imperfect joints and cause fire to spread along the
creasote "trail".
Your basic chimney is only 5/8" clay tile, 1/2" airspace and maybe
4" of brick. During a chimney fire the fire will draw into the
flue through the chimney's brickwork and cause the joints to
further expand. Ordinary mortar performs poorly above 800 deg F
and looses 1/2 it's strength above 900 deg F.
So much for the problem. The Europeans started making their
masonry stoves idiot proof many years ago. Things they were
trying to accomplish were to insulate the flue and contain condensation
(creasote). Methods used were:
1) New safe flue liners. Using light sand-stone mixtures (pumice)
which insulate and keep flue gases warmer than clay tiles.
Some of these liners have also been tested at up to 1800 deg F
then doused with cold water and not shown any signs of damage.
2) Flue insulation. Three common types are mineral wool, air, and
a poured mix of a light aggregate and portland cement. There
are also precuts which basically are a 1" jacket that slides
in between the flue liner and block.
There are also some modular units that combine both of the above
plus have the outer masonry attached as well.
There, well I hope I didn't get off the subject too far......
-gary
|
166.58 | Rebuilding/repointing chimney exposed above roof | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Fri Mar 06 1987 14:00 | 20 |
|
THE FACTS:
While chipping away the damn ice (or is it ice dam) on the roof
this winter, I happened to notice the poor condition of the top
of the chimney. Specifically, the mortar between the bricks seems
to be completely falling out and the cement on the top is also
breaking away. The condition of the rest of the chimney within
the house appears to be fine.
THE QUESTIONS:
Is this a problem I should tackle? (I've never done masonry before)
Should the chimney be taken down to the first row of "good" bricks?
Should I pick out the loose mortar and try to stuff new mortar in?
Should I practice on my neighbor's chimney first? ;-)
Any suggestions or recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Phil
|
166.59 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Mar 06 1987 14:29 | 5 |
| What's your mailstop? I happen to have a couple of copies of Fine Homebuilding
in here at work (to enter the Great Moments stories), and there just happens to
be an article here on repointing brickwork. I'll copy it and send it to you.
Paul
|
166.60 | the infamous "me too" | QUOKKA::SNYDER | Wherever you go, there you are | Fri Mar 06 1987 14:42 | 6 |
|
Howdy, Paul. I have the identical problem and I want to take
care of it this summer. Would you mind sending me a copy as
well? My mail stop is CXO1-2/N22. Thanks.
Sid
|
166.61 | | FROST::SIMON | Mister Diddy Wah Diddy? | Fri Mar 06 1987 14:52 | 8 |
|
I remember a couple of years ago when they went through the Mill
(MLO that is) and repointed much of the existing brickwork. It
came out pretty nice I seem to remember. It didn't look like a
very hard job.
-gary
|
166.62 | Just what the doctor ordered!!! | WELFAR::PGRANSEWICZ | | Fri Mar 06 1987 14:58 | 8 |
|
Re: .1
That sounds great!!! My mail stop is WFR1-1/H2. This file is the
greatest thing that ever happened to us first time home owners.
Thanks,
Phil
|
166.63 | me too! me too! | HENRY8::ESONIS | What now? | Fri Mar 06 1987 16:21 | 7 |
| re .1 ...
i also have that problem... what's the month/year of that issue
of fine homebuilding? i can get it at the library.
steve
|
166.64 | | TOPCAT::ALLEN | Someday we'll think back and smile | Sat Mar 07 1987 07:10 | 6 |
| It is normal for the mortor to fall out as you described and should
be a preiodic maintence item for anyone with a chimmney. Not every
year, but regular inspections are warrented. Pointing is easy,
you just have to fill the voids with mortor. Just don't use your
fingers as I once did, it wore three layers of skin off. Pointing
tools are cheap.
|
166.65 | The article is in issue #2, April/May 1981 | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Mon Mar 09 1987 09:00 | 0 |
166.66 | Chimney Cap(ing) | THORBY::MARRA | man - Egypt .neq. Egypt - man | Wed Mar 11 1987 08:21 | 15 |
|
I tried this in the STOVES conference, but I guess nobody there
does masonry...
---
Soon I need to put a cap on the chimney to keep the upcomming monsoon
out of the stove pipe and from dripping down inside the fireplace.
So, I have a few large pieces of slate, and am going to be getting
some bricks to finish the fireplace and hearth soon. What is the
'best' way to put the cap onto the top of the chimney?
.dave.
|
166.67 | What are you going to use for the cap? | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Wed Mar 11 1987 08:55 | 1 |
|
|
166.68 | | THORBY::MARRA | man - Egypt .neq. Egypt - man | Wed Mar 11 1987 12:00 | 10 |
|
> What are you going to use for the cap?
a very big piece of slate supported by bricks.
My question is, how far off the top of the chimney should the slate
be attached (1 brick, 2 bricks,). Should the bricks be vertical
or horizontal? Should I tilt the slate of leave it flat......
.dave.
|
166.69 | I used it also to prevent rain coming in the fireplace | AMULET::YELINEK | | Thu Mar 12 1987 11:21 | 0 |
166.70 | | THORBY::MARRA | man - Egypt .neq. Egypt - man | Fri Mar 13 1987 09:33 | 18 |
|
Good point - cleaning. I guess it would be tough to clean with
the slate in the way.
But, I need to keep in mind that the slate is free, and the bricks
are really close to free, and the work will be done by myself
and a friend who has done masonry. So, I still can not justify
buying a SScap.
I guess I'll have to drill through the slate, through the brick
too, into the chimney (slightly) to install some reinforcement
rods, and slip the slate over the rods. This way I can easily
remove the slate for cleaning. It shouldn't weigh more than
a few (20?) pounds.
Hmm. Something to think about...
.dave.
|
166.71 | TOPPER TO CHIMNEY | USWAV1::GREYNOLDS | PAINTS-sports model of horses | Fri Mar 13 1987 10:23 | 16 |
| When I lived in N.H.several years ago I built my own chinney and
used a slate top like you mentioned......
looks sorta like this
__________________
|__________________|----SLATE
|___| |___|
|___| |___| ----HALF BRICK(IF I REMEMBER 4)
|___| |___|
|___|________|___|
|________________|
|________________|
| |
PLACE THE MORTERED HALF BRICK W/GOOD FACE OUT AT EACH CORNER,MAKING
SURE THET TOP COURSE IS LEVEL........PLACE SLATE ON TOP (YOUR DONE)
|
166.72 | wouldn't the wind blow the loose slate off? | YODA::BARANSKI | Searching for Lowell Apartmentmates... | Fri Mar 13 1987 14:42 | 0 |
166.73 | Any draft problems? | THORBY::MARRA | I belong to Him! | Wed Mar 18 1987 08:34 | 8 |
|
re .6; No, but another huricane might!
re .5; thanks. Finally an answer I was looking for. I was thinking
of only 2 bricks, but you picture shows four. Does this give sufficent
draft?
.dave.
|
166.74 | chimney reply | USWAV1::GREYNOLDS | PAINTS-sports model of horses | Fri Mar 20 1987 10:50 | 7 |
| REF.875.5 if I remember right it was 4 halfbricks and the slate
rested right on top w/no problem,,an the wind never bothered it.
One good result was with a high wind like Jan/Feb nights sometimes
give us the chinney didn't give me any downdrafts.It did before
I put that slate on....any questions you can call me at dtn 221-5425
gary reynolds
|
166.109 | Chimney clogged? Knock it down! | MIZZEN::DEMERS | No NeWS is Good NeWS | Fri Apr 24 1987 10:54 | 13 |
| Two unrelated questions, but in the interest of disk space...
Will landfills (in my case Stow/Hudson) take old block from a torn
down chimney? Given the hassle of loading them up, I'd hate to
have the guy tell me to turn around.
I'm experiencing some funny electrical happenings in the house(no
drugs involved!). I'd like to talk to the local company (Hudson
Elect). Has anyone ever traced a problem to their wires and/or
transformers. Will they even think I'm serious?
Chris
|
166.110 | Is it brick? | PUNK::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Fri Apr 24 1987 14:43 | 4 |
| Is the torn down chimney brick? Lots of people like old used
brick so they may even cart it off for you.
-al
|
166.111 | | MAY11::WARCHOL | | Fri Apr 24 1987 15:48 | 9 |
| As for your second question about Hudson Electric they also supply
power to my house in Boxborough. They have been very helpful and
curtious. When we had a broken neutral line between the pole and
our house (didn't know if it was before or after the meter) they
came out, found the problem, replaced the wire from the pole to
the house,and surprisingly called back the next day to make sure
everything was still working OK.
Nick
|
166.112 | | PAXVAX::NAYLOR | Mark E. Naylor | Fri Apr 24 1987 18:31 | 9 |
| Chris,
If no one wants the bricks and you cannot get rid of them,
maybe we could work a deal. I'll be getting a 30 yard dumpster
in a few weeks. You could bring them over and toss 'em in.
Mark
|
166.113 | | FSTVAX::ELSHEIMER | TOM ELSHEIMER DTN 249-4915 | Mon May 04 1987 13:18 | 18 |
| Chris,
As for the Malone dump, I don't think they will take your bricks
as a load. A few at atime yes.
As for Hudson Power And Light. I had a problem last fall with my
lights get bright then dim. This was in the whole house. I called
the light dept. and they came out and replaced all the leadins from
the pole. A week later they called to see if the problem was
corrected. It was for about two weeks. I called an electrician
to see what they could find, they found that the ground into the
CB panel was just making contact. He pulled more lead and re connected
the ground. That fixed it. I have been in the house for 8 yrs.
and lived with this. The house was built in 1972. So much for
the building inspectors.
tom
|
166.114 | Water problems - chimney and slab | PEANO::BLACK | | Mon May 04 1987 17:09 | 64 |
| Some quick help with a big problem.
We have a five year old house half way down a hill. Lots of rock about.
No cellar - slab construction.
As soon as we bought it, we found a lake in the living room (This was
Friday 19th December, 1986, see note 665). Clearly it was coming *through*
the slab. There were some shrinkage cracks around the edges, but they
weren't even wet. Big puddle in the middle and by the brick hearth on the
outside wall at one end of the room. Adjoining dinning room also very
damp, but not actually pooling.
So, we got in a few "experts", all of whom said that we needed french
drains. So we sepnd ~$3000 on a 4' trench with perforated pipe round three
sides of the house, crushed rock, a dry well, backfilling, etc, etc.
I also caulked all the shrinkage cracks and put a couple of galons of
Thompson's water seal on the slab, before having the carpet reinstalled
over new foam padding.
So, everything is dandy until the big storm at the end of April. More
water, but this time only around the fireplace, so far as I can tell. (I
didn't take the fitted carpet up completely this time, since we have a
grand piano on it ...). Looking closely, I could see the water seeping out
where the bricks of the hearth met the slab. We also had water running down
inside the chimney, but since it is straight up to the sky, this isn't too
suprising.
So now I don't know if I have ground-water or chimney leaks. We DO have a
cracked cap on top of the chimney, and a morter joint that has opened and
needs repointing. But would that give us GALLONS of water at the base of
the chimney? It was wet again after last Tuesday's snowstorm, when we had
8 inches of wet white stuff on the ground.
We have had a half dozen contractors look at this, and a couple of house
insepctors. The drain men say drains, and the masons say bricks, and we
clearly need to caulk the cracks, but it seems like noone really KNOWS.
The town (Westford, MA) building inspector looked at it today. He
hypothesises that we have water coming up INSIDE the foundations, and that
we need "weepers" in the foundation wall to let it out. About 2 feet
underground. He says connect the weepers to "schedule 40" pipe and lead it
away downhill. What is a weeper? A 6 inch diameter hole in the foundation
wall made with a *jackhammer*, heaven help us. (Schedule 40 pipe is some
kind of metal pipe.) Personally, I'm inclinde to let the weepers empty
into the french drains that are already right there.
Well, presumably this guy (whom my wife spoke with) knows his stuff, but I
am a little reluctant to take a jackhammer to my foundations. However, if
this is going to be done, I want it done SOON, because we are about to have
landscaping work done ('cause of the the regrading and the drains), and
while they have a digger and crushed rock on site, it'll make sense to use
them.
(If I had a core drill handy, I might feel happier about that, but they
arn't two a penny...)
Do any of you noters have experience with "weepers", chimneys, etc? Is
there any hope for us?
Singed,
Wet in Westford
Or - We always wanted a pool, but not in the living room ...
|
166.115 | | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Mon May 04 1987 17:47 | 17 |
| Sorry to hear about your problems... can't help too much there other
than suggesting doing the cheap things first, re. repointing and
caulking before more excavation etc...
Re. Schedule 40 pipe, I believe the term refers to the strenght
of the pipe in regards to crushing. For example the thick plastic
pipe used for waste plumbing (in my house anyways) is Schedule 40
where as the plastic drain pipe commonly used outside for drainage
is probably Schedule 20. You should be able to find it marked on
the side.
If you have to install weep drains, I don't see why they couldn't drain
into your recently installed french drains which are probably Schedule
20 pipe.
Charly
|
166.116 | Thoroseal it... | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Mon May 04 1987 22:24 | 27 |
|
Dear Wet,
Another suggestion. Try getting ahold of some THOROSEAL from
your local hardware store. It is a product that comes in a powder
form (like cement) usually in 40 or 60 pound bags. It is mixed
with water to a consistency of paint, and is then brushed on like
paint to the foundation, or slab in your case. It does a fantas-
tic job of keeping water out. I realize of course, that this may
be hard for you to do since the slab is covered with carpeting or
other flooring materials, but the cost of the materials is cheap
and in the long run, the whole procedure MAY turn out to be less
expensive than jackhammering the slab.
In my 'hardware store' days, I had a customer who had a similar
problem to yours except on a full foundation, and the water was
entering through the walls. We talked him into applying the
thoroseal to his foundation walls. He did and when the next
bad storm came around he returned to the store. The thoroseal
worked so well on the walls that the water started entering through
the floor. We sold a few more bags of Thoroseal that day, and he
never had troubles again. It's good stuff.
If your problem IS with the slab, and not the chimney, you
may want to look into this product. Sometimes an easy remedy is
overlooked by profit seeking contractors.
Good luck.
Jon
|
166.117 | What color is Thoroseal? | PEANO::BLACK | | Tue May 05 1987 19:48 | 11 |
| What color is Thoroseal? It would have to go around the bottom row of
bricks of the hearth, and the morter joints. Seems like I migt well put it
on the chimney too.
When I went to the hardware store, they sold me the Thompson's water seal.
Like most such products, it claims to work only when there is no
hydrostatic presure. Of course, since the slab is above grade, if there
was no hydrostatic pressure there would be no water in the living room :-)
Thanks for the hints.
|
166.118 | Your choice of colors... | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Tue May 05 1987 21:04 | 8 |
| It comes in both white and gray. Like anything else nowadays,
the product that has the most advertising gets pushed the most,
and Thompson's has done some heavy promoting. Thompson's is great
stuff when it's used for it's intended purpose (about the best you
can get) which is, to be applied to an outside surface to keep water
from GOING through. Thoroseal is applied to an inside surface to
keep water from COMING through (ie. hydrostatic pressure) which is
the problem your having.
|
166.119 | Weep Drains | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Wed May 06 1987 10:04 | 16 |
| Re. Weep Drains
A "Weep Drain" is used in a wall to allow accumlated water on one side
to pass thru and relieve the hydrostatic pressure. Sometimes they are
large pipes 3-4" in size, you see these in landscaping and outside
retaining walls. Other times they may be small holes in the cement
between bricks.
Due to the nature of the application, transfer water from one side
of a wall to another, you generally won't see them in a foundation.
Except if you had a severe pressure problem under a slab home, then
they might be what you need.
Will weep drains solve the author's problem...? I don't know.
Charly
|
166.120 | OK, boys, so 'dis is 'da plan ... | PEANO::BLACK | | Wed May 06 1987 10:13 | 22 |
| I think that I've ruled out jackhammering the foundations. Even if it DOES
fix the water problem, it will surely give me other, bigger problems.
I've had one other suggestion: dig up part of the slab near the livingroom
wall (i.e., inside the house). Dig down below the level of the bottom of
the foundation wall. Put in crushed rock, and then patch the slab.
Essentially, one would be building a drywell under the living room. If
there is indeed a spring under there, the water should then flow thru the
rock and into my french drains.
So my current plan is to fix the cracks on the chimney and waterproof the
bricks (for which Thompson's *does* seem to be the right sort of stuff). If
I'm still wet, try the Thoroseal. I'ld have to put it on the brick hearth,
and then do something to camouflage the color - like frame the bricks in wood
(held in place with glue, naturally). And if that fails, the drywell.
The following alternative was also suggested:
Rotohammer a 1/2" hole in the slab in the center of the room, just in
front of the hearth. Fix in a length of copper pipe, and connect to a
bird bath. Call it a fountain, claim it adds $k to the value of the
property, and move.
|
166.121 | Maybe weep drains would help! | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Wed May 06 1987 10:34 | 17 |
| After re-reading the base note and all of the replies, maybe the
weep drains would help.
If what the author suspects is true, water pressure under the floor
in the living room, and that's not too unlikely being on the down
side of a hill, you need to relieve that pressure. If you are willing
to go to the trouble of digging up the inside of the house then
an attempt at weep drains should be cheaper.
If you have a four foot foudation wall in the probelm area, with
your newly installed footing (french) drain there as well, give
the weep drains a shot. Dig down 2-3 feet, rent a roto-hammer
and chisel a 3-6" hole thru the foundation. If you find wet dirt
on the other side of the wall, or even water, then your on the right
track.
Charly
|
166.122 | Relieve Your Pressure First! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Thu May 07 1987 09:16 | 44 |
| I second the suggestion of investigating the inside section of your
foundation. The last house I had, had perimeter drains around the
outside of the entire foundation. These are similar to your outside
french drains, which work OK for water coming in from beyond your
foundation/slab. But in my old house, and I bet in yours, the work
which raises up under your slab may be trapped and the only way
it can relieve its self is to work its way into your living room.
The pressure from trapped water was so great in home that it sounded
like birds singing in the cellar evry spring or heavy rain storm.
The whistling was generated through small cement cracks in the floor,
you had to hear it to believe it. I tolerated the problem for a
because the basement was unfinished. In my new house I installed
the perimeter drains on the outside and inside of the footing and
haven't seen or heard anything yet.
It would seem logical to me, direct your efforts at relieving the
internally created water pressure under your slab by poking a few
holes into it and then draining off the water. Digging a couple
of feet down along the outside slab section of your problem area,
then drilling a few holes through the footing/frost wall may solve
your problem. It's an inexpensive approach to a solution. I'd be
weary/doubtful that any paint on product would have any lasting
solution. Water pressure created from a rising water table can be
substantial (remember my birds in the cellar) and sooner or later
your water problem will be back. You must relieve that pressure
buildup.
I'd also suggest you check some other simple items that may be
contributing to the overall problem:
- make sure you have backfilled such that the ground is sloped away
from your slab - get the surface water running away from your house
- you said you live on a side of a hill, perhaps you can do alittle
regrading to divert the drainage water coming off the hill to an
area beyond your home
- check to see of your gutter (if you have any) dump near your problem
areas, if so redirect flow away from the house with buried drainage
pipes or dump the gutter drains at the other end.
Hope this helps!
Bill D.
|
166.123 | Here's a picture | PEANO::BLACK | | Thu May 07 1987 11:13 | 38 |
|
I thougt I'ld give .8 a diagram. When we had the drains put in we also had
the area around the house regraded. The end of the house with the wet
chimney faces North, and is sideways-on to the slope. There are no
gutters, but the chimney wall is a gable end and is about the only side of
the house that does not get rainwater runoff.
/
Chimney H /
H/\ /
H \ __/
/H \ __/
| H |House __/
East <--- || | | ___/ Hill ---> West
|| | | ___/
-----------\___ /
_/ \__/
_/
_/
road
It is indeed possible that there is a subterranean channel running from
higher up the hill to a point just under our fireplace. But even if I
drill through the foundation wall, I may miss it.
I'm now inclined to rent a rotohammer and "have a go". A couple of
questions? How thick is my foundation wall likely to be? Six inches? Eight
inches? How may hours of rotohammering am I talking about?
And, obviously, where can I rent a heavy duty rotohammer in the
Lowel/Acton/Littleton/Nashua area?
Still wet, but pleased to see the sun.
|
166.124 | | USMRM2::CBUSKY | | Thu May 07 1987 11:30 | 14 |
| Your foundation wall is probably 8 - 10" thick. You can rent the
electric chipping hammer, AKA rotohammer, AKA Hilti-hammer at
most rental stores. I recently rented one for about $32 for a half
day.
You should be able to chip a 4-6" hole through the wall in about 15
minutes. I does not have to be anthing neat, just a hole for water to
escape and then run down the outside of the wall into your footing
drains.
Your biggest problem will be digging a hole big enough for you to
get down into so that you can comfortably use the chipping hammer.
Charly
|
166.125 | TRY THIS - BWN | VICKI::JHAVERI | | Fri May 08 1987 16:55 | 9 |
| Well, I don't have more time to write big note but why not contact
Basement Waterproofing Nationwide/NH INC., person to contact Don
Kelly 603 625 9309.
No, I don't get any commission. But if wish you can tell him my name.
I have read very fast your note and there reply.
PJ(Pravin)
|
166.10 | Fireplace & Furnace Sharing a Chimney? | CURIE::TEGNELL | | Fri May 22 1987 11:01 | 15 |
|
re: .8
Is it possible and safe to put a liner in a chimney that also hosts a
furnace flu? It seems to me that this could isolate the furnace
from the fireplace sufficiently. Just finding space for the liner
next to the flu might be a problem - how small can a liner be?
Which type of liner would work best - tile, stainless steel, balloon?
Finally, how else can you exhaust the furnace besides sacrificing
at least one fireplace? A beautiful anitique fireplace that doesn't
work is extremely depressing to me.
/jct
|
166.11 | more? | FROST::SIMON | Blown away in the country...Vermont | Fri May 22 1987 13:42 | 13 |
| re: < Note 4.10 by CURIE::TEGNELL >
> -< Fireplace & Furnace Sharing a Chimney? >-
What do you have currently? Is there one existing flue in the current
chimney? Is there a space for another flue? I don't think you want to
go any smaller than 6" for a flue. Also most codes prohibit wood and
any other solid fuel from being vented into the same chimney.
A picture would be worth many word...
-gary
|
166.75 | Multi-flue cap | VIA::ASCHNEIDER | Andy Schneider - DTN 381-2475 | Wed Aug 26 1987 11:50 | 21 |
| Been a while since this topic's been discussed.....
I've got a chimney with 3 flues (believe each is a 8"x8"
square). One of the end ones is for the wood stove, the
other end one is closed off. The middle one is for the fireplace.
A couple of years ago I was getting water down the wood stove
flue, so I got an el-cheapo cap for that single flue. Now,
the problem is in heavy rains or melting snow, the water falls
off of the cap on the end into the fireplace flue, causing
water down into the fireplace area.
Question I have is this - do they make a cap to cover more than
1 flue at a time? To cover the 2 active ones would suffice,
to cover all 3 would be best. I'm going to call the chimney sweeps
next month to clean the chimney, and will ask them, but was wondering
if anyone knew of the existance of a multi-flue cap - or something
to solve this problem.
thanks,
andy
|
166.76 | slate cap | LDP::BURKHART | | Thu Aug 27 1987 14:30 | 21 |
| I also have a triple flue chimney but it is capped with three
pieces of slate offset from the top with bricks. see below.
This might be a bit too expensive for a quick fix. but thought
I'd mention it.
While I'm here... does any one know how to remove this slate
when it comes time for cleaning?
__________ ____________ ____________
| || || |<-- 3 pieces of slate
---------- ------------ ------------
** **** **** **<----bricks
** **** **** **
+------------------------------------+
| |<----chimney
thanks...
...Dave
|
166.77 | deja vu | TASMAN::EKOKERNAK | | Thu Aug 27 1987 15:04 | 5 |
| I have recently seen a picture just like this! It's either here
or in KRYSTAL::STOVES. Check that note out.
Elaine
|
166.12 | Another Chimney heard from... | SAWDST::PAQUETTE | Colonial Computing Nut | Fri Oct 30 1987 12:23 | 19 |
|
I have the same dilema. My old house has two inside chimneys with
four flues each. Each flue ORIGINALLY had a fireplace. Now only four still
exist. One fireplace has been "punched through" with a sheet metal flue for
the Oil furnace. Another has a sheet metal flue for a wood stove.
I am seriously thinking of building a NEW external Chimney with two
flues. One for the Furnace and the other for the Gas hot water heater.
Now I will have my ORIGINAL fireplaces back. I am in the process of getting
estimates for:
1) rebuilding the two old chimneys
or
2) relining the two old chimneys
The house is a two story hip-roofed colonial. Anyone have any ideas what
these estimates will come in at.....?
-=Dennis
|
166.13 | Bricks are cheap | HOBBIT::RIDGE | | Fri Oct 30 1987 17:05 | 18 |
|
I recently had a fireplace installed cost, me $2800. It was a new
installation and the foundation was poured at the same time at the
foundation for the addition. We had floor to ceiling bricks inside
(std ceiling height) and only had to go one story up outside. A
little higher outside to reach the necessary height above the nearest
roof line (garage).
The biggest cost is labor. The bricks are cheap, anywhere from .25
ea and up. Regular "NEW" used brick was about .38 ea. I think we
used approx 1500-1700 brick (I'll check). Then add the fire brick
for inside, flue, hearth blue stone, mmantel etc.
This project did not include taking down an old chimney, which
would add to the cost.
|
166.14 | 200 years ago this wouldn't be a problem | SAWDST::PAQUETTE | Colonial Computing Nut | Mon Nov 02 1987 12:31 | 17 |
|
The estimate from Royal Chimney Sweeps came in as:
$1000 to rebuild each chimney from the roof up
$1200 for a stainless steel liner per flue...
I found out that there are only three flues/per chimney and
the are 6" X 24" in dimension. A strange shape but common in old
houses? The poured liner is out because of the unusual size.
We do not have enough clearance for an 8" pipe and therefore they
do not recommend the chimneys for fireplace use. What a shame!
200 year original fireplaces that can't be used!
-=Dennis
|
166.126 | Status Report | ERLANG::BLACK | | Wed Dec 02 1987 15:37 | 42 |
| This is a little late, but I thought that "our readers" might be
interested in knowing what happedned in the end.
We finally got hold of a mason who seemed to know what he was doing.
One morning, when some other joib was delayed and he was at a loose
end, he actually came and
(1) Fixed a "cold joint" in the chimney, which ran right the
way around, about six courses from the top.
(2) replaced the mortar "crown" on the top of the chimney, which
was badly cracked
(3) Put a large slab of stone over the top of the chimney,
supported on brick piers at the corners. He said that this
was much better than the metal caps, which cause the cresote
to condense and run doen the outside of the chimney.
After that, we
(4) painted the outside of the chimney with Thompsons
water seal-type stuff, and
(5) silicone-caulked the cracks between the wood siding and
the bricks of the chimney.
Since then, we have had no more water. (5) seemed to help most
(and was the easiest and cheapest thing to do). I'm even thinking
about putting the fitted carpet back down (does anyone have a
stretcher?) but am afraid to tempt fate.
We DO still get a slight musty smell after rain. Also, for several
days after we have had a fire, we can smell what seems to be damp ash.
Nothing in the fireplace is damp to the touch, however. Also, we get
some efflorescence on a few of the bricks, at waist hight, which says
to me that they are getting wet and then drying out.
So, the situation is livable, although not perfect. I think that
I now believe that the moisture comes from above, not below, and
I'm glad that I didn't take a jack-hammer to my foundations after
all.
|
166.129 | Squirrels in my chimney | ERLANG::BLACK | | Sun Dec 13 1987 13:08 | 21 |
| I have squirrels in my chimney. Well, I'm sure that I have at least
one, ince we had an eye-ball to eye-ball confrontation this morning
through the glass doors.
I was reluctant totry and reach in to the fireplcae to catch the
little bugger, since I was pretty confident of having him slip through
my fingers and leave a trail of little black footprints all across
the funrniture, curtains etc. So I eventually persuaded him to
climb back up the chimney, and I closed the damper.
I'm guessing that the little blighters have something to do with
the difficulty I had lighting a fire last night. I may have a nest.
What should I do?
Eventually, I guess that I need to put a wire mesh over the top
of the chimney. How do I fasten it? I have a bluestone cap over
the chimney-pot. But before I do that, how do I make sure that
the squirrels are outside?
Andrew
|
166.130 | The Raccoon Flu | FHOOA::PENFROY | Paul from M!ch!gan | Mon Dec 14 1987 08:28 | 12 |
| We had Racoons in our chimney once. The babies made a lot of
noise. What was recommended to us was to drop a rag soaked in bleach
down there. Ten minutes after doing so the mother peeked out of the
top of the chimney to see if the coast was clear. Then one by one
she brought about five babies out and hid them in the woods.
We put a screen on the flue that had flanges that exerted outward
pressure inside the flue that held it on. Just a little push and
it was on for good. Then we reached up through the damper inside
and pulled out the rag and we were done. It took about 20 minutes
in all.
|
166.131 | I like having fingers. | FRSBEE::DEROSA | | Mon Dec 14 1987 10:59 | 6 |
|
I don't think you want to be reaching in to try to grab a squirrel
unless you don't care about your fingers.
.1 sounds reasonble.
|
166.132 | If you have to try and catch one... | PSTJTT::TABER | Alimentary, my dear Watson | Mon Dec 14 1987 11:29 | 13 |
| A neat rick for those times that you have to catch a frightened
rodent: get a tash can (the tall kitchen types are great) and set it
near the place you plan to flush the little critter from with the mouth
facing the spot you expect it to come from. Don't shine any light into
the trash can, you want it to be a large, inviting dark space. When you
flush the animal, it will see the large, dark hiding place, and make a
beeline for it. Just slam the lid on, and you have critter in a can,
ready for whatever you had in mind.
I've done it with mice, chipmunks and squirrels. Works like a charm.
(The cat likes to bring these things into the house for us to enjoy.)
>>>==>PStJTT
|
166.133 | chimneys | MRMFG1::J_BORZUMATO | | Mon Dec 14 1987 15:34 | 5 |
| note...... please be careful with squirrels they carry the
disease ..... rabies..........
jim.
|
166.134 | | BSS::HOE | The Rockies lets you come higher. | Mon Dec 14 1987 16:11 | 6 |
| RE .1's solution
We capped our chimney with topper that kept the elements and rodents
out. Not a rodent showed up in the last year.
/cal
|
166.135 | Boo! | AKOV68::CRAMER | | Mon Dec 14 1987 16:14 | 10 |
| re:.5
I can see how a ghost will keep rodents away, but, how does he keep
out the elements? ;^)
I assume you meant copper?
Alan
|
166.136 | Fireproof Rodent | ERLANG::BLACK | | Tue Dec 15 1987 10:11 | 22 |
| For your further edification and ammusement:
The evening after I submitted the base note, I had a good blaze
going in the hearth. It had actually been burning for a couple of
hours. I had just put another log on the fire, and the glass doors
and wire screen were open.
Well, I'm sitting in my armchair reading, and I hear some scrapong
sounds in the chimney, near the damper. Before I have time to react,
out pops our friend the squirrel, right through the flames.
We shooed him out of the patio doors on the third attempt.
So, clearly smoke doesn't seem to wory him too much. I'll try the
bleach trick this weekend.
Maybe he like the centrally heated squirrel house, and will bring
his friends?
Andrew
|
166.137 | Squirrels from hell | PSTJTT::TABER | Alimentary, my dear Watson | Tue Dec 15 1987 10:17 | 2 |
| He came through the fire!?!?! If the bleach doesn't work, call an
exorcist.
|
166.15 | Hi bob_the_hiker! | YODA::GROETZINGER | Tom Groetzinger | Tue Dec 15 1987 16:23 | 47 |
| I see no reason why you couldn't use your fireplaces providing they are
used only casually and the flues are in reasonable condition. That 6"
dimension is a real killer as the smallest formers I know of are 5"
and you still need at least 3/4" of lining material around the former.
That means 5" plus 1 1/2" = 6 1/2" minimum dimension.
And there is only one product that I know of that meets the 3/4"
minimum specification. That product is Solid-Flue (spelling?).
I suppose you could use duct-work, messy and difficult but possible.
Excellent points by previous noters regarding flowing creosote (carbon).
In a chimney fire the temperature of the burning creosote will exceed
(sitting down?) 2000 degrees F. The standard clay tile that was and is
used to line chimneys was not intended to resist temperatures of that
range. Only a properly poured lining, which IS designed to withstand
these temps, will provide chimney fire safety. As noted previously
a poured lining fills all cracks and crevices (and pours out through
holes long since covered by walls and forgotten) and strengthens the
chimney structurally.
Incedentally, stainless steel liners are ok for some wood-burning
installations, but NEVER NEVER NEVER for coal burners! A by-product
of combustion of coal is sulphur dioxide (we all know what that is, right?).
When sulphur dioxide combines with water guess what you have. Would you
believe sulphuric acid? Guess what that does to stainless.
Tom_the_chimney_man
__\__
| / |
| \ |
| / |
| \ |
| / |
\ \ \ | \ |
/ / / | / |
\ \ \ | \ |
._______. | / |
| | | \ |
| |---------------|_/ |
| |---------------| |
| ^^^ |
|
166.459 | FLUE DAMPER pros/cons | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Thu Jan 07 1988 22:44 | 11 |
| Had my Mass Save audit done today, among other things, they recommended the
installation of a Flue Damper. This is a mechanical device that closes the
furnace flue when the furnace is closed. He said it had to be installed by a
professional (building codes?), that it would cost about $75, and would pay
for itself in 2 years.
That's his opinion, what do the rst of you think? (anyone had this done, etc?
thanx /j
Wouldn't there be a risk of fire if the unit failed one day?
|
166.460 | Barometric? | SMURF::WALLACE | Life's a beach, then you dive! | Fri Jan 08 1988 09:48 | 9 |
|
Are you referring to the barometric damper? I have such a strong
draft through my chimney that my barometric damper is almost continual-
ly open even when the furnace is off. I'm sure this is one reason
my cellar feels so cold, and I can feel alot of air flowing through
the damper from the inside to the outside. If this is what you
are referring to then I would definately go with it. I've got to
look into a solution for this problem as well.
|
166.461 | follow the Mass Save advice | MRMFG1::J_BORZUMATO | | Fri Jan 08 1988 09:51 | 23 |
| first off, i'm a little surprised your second guessing the auditor.
in my opinion they come with pretty high marks, unless something
has changed. Don't get me wrong, i'm not here to pass along
any unnecessary criticism's.
1st as for the suggestion of installing a flue damperm, he's
correct.
2nd. as for having a professional do it, He had no choice but
to advise you this way. If he said "but you can do it yourself"
he could have opened himself up to a law suit. Legally you can't
do it yourself. You decide. A 2 year recovery is pretty dam good.
I had the audit done several years ago, one thing they recommended
was a set back thermostat, i bought a Honeywell unit, but was
surprised that it cost $80.00 (not installed) The first year
i saved $69.00 in fuel. Reason, if you try to manage the
thermostat manually, you have all the good intentions,
but it doesn't take much forgetting to put a hole in that
theory.
He gave you some good advice, my advice is you follow it.
Jim.
|
166.462 | How about a different kind of vent? | CRAIG::YANKES | | Fri Jan 08 1988 10:27 | 10 |
|
Are there any kind of dampers for dryer vents? Even connected
to my dryer, the hose itelf is very cold and the inside of the dryer
(when not in use :-) is cold. (Its gas, so no pointer is needed
to the "indoor dryer venting" note.)
Is there anything that attaches to the outdoor vent and opens
when there is "sufficient" difference in air pressure?
-c
|
166.463 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Fri Jan 08 1988 10:42 | 7 |
| Most dryer vents I've seen terminate in a spring-loaded (or
gravity-loaded) flap. Typically this piece is sold as part of the
'dryer vent kits' that the hardware stores sell. Should be able to
pick one up at channel, slumbervill, grossmans, etc. Basically, the
air pressure from the dryer is sufficent to keep the normally-closed
flap open.
|
166.464 | Flue Dampers are good, BUT | SQM::LANDMAN | | Fri Jan 08 1988 17:51 | 8 |
| The flue damper opens up in the presence of heat. The professional
installation requirement is to ensure that the furnace turns off
if the damper doesn't open.
You don't have to worry about a fire. If it doesn't open, the house
will be full of the nasties that should go up the flue, and you
would sleep through any fire/earthquake/flood.
|
166.465 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jan 11 1988 09:45 | 7 |
| Those things are designed to "fail-safe", I believe; if they don't
work they stay open (in theory....)
Re: .1, no, they are not the same as a barometric damper. These
things close off the chimney flue completely, so no air can go up
the chimney.
Is it worth it? "Probably."
|
166.466 | Order yours ASAP! | SALEM::M_TAYLOR | | Mon Jan 11 1988 14:05 | 70 |
| Hello. Since no-one has hit the nail on the head, allow me!
I've owned 2 of them and think it should be part of all heating
systems (gas or oil-fired). .6 Says that they close off the chimney
completely... that's true, which is all-important. Also true is
that the device fails open. I installed both of mine and have to
admit to leaving the heating plant in BETTER condition than I found
it (one new system--new constr, one old system--23 yrs old). They
cost about $150., and will definitely pay for themselves in some
time frame. In my first house, the 23-yr.-old, I could stand on
the roof near the chimney, and 'feel' heat rushing out of the pipe.
It felt as if the palnt was firing--but it was just standby heat-loss.
In the coldest part of the winter, when the northwest winds howl
for days, (this was in Merrimack, NH) My plant's 275-gallon fuel
tank would need a re-fill every 3 weeks!. The damper, in my case,
extended the tanklife to 9 weeks!!!!. Simple math shows that this
unit paid for itself within the first tank-full. This will be similar
savings for anyone whose Barometric draft stays open on windy days.
It means that you've got an air-infiltration problem if this occurs.
(and your damper's draft is in calibration) If the draft is out
of cal., then excessive air-infiltration may not be a problem. You
need some make-up air for the unit (heating plant) to fire properly,
but in my case, there was simply too much. Remember that what air
(or heat) goes up your chimney needs to be replaced by make-up air,
and this is what comes in around your windows, doors, electrical
boxes, pipe penetrations all over the house (sewer vent pipes are
famous for this where they travel thru "plates" in different floors
of your house) and just any cracks in the outer shell of the house.
Anyhow, the more air infiltration you have, the more you have to
gain by installing a flue damper. The unit interferes with the normal
primary control circuits of your Oil Burner unit in such a way as
to interlock the boiler from firing up when the damper's closed.
the damper is spring loaded and must be shut electrically by a 28
vac control circuit which can only supply the required voltage if
the boileer isn't firing. The motor that closes the damper is a
low-geared small motor like found in rotiserrie units for BBQ grills.
The control unit has a programmed 3-minute delay after unit firing
which allows the combustion chamber to purge with fresh air prior
to closing the damper. This is necessary mainly because of the fact
that fuel continues to spray into the chamber after oil-burner shut-off
while the motor is spinning down and this fuel doesn't burn since
the ignition transformer is shut down at this time. The resultant
is a nearly explosive gas at high temperature in your combustion
chamber. This must have a chance to purge!
One other thing to add about how much performance/fuel savings you
can get is that your system may already have a built-in version
of this device which works as an aperture on the air-inlet to the
oil-burner, and opens and closes centrifugally, by the spin of the
motor. This relatively inexpensive part keeps the heat in your
boiler/furnace with a limited ability for make-up air to enter the
unit during idle periods. Look for a longer payback period if you
have one of these and also a relatively tight house.
In summary, if you close off a seven-or-so-inch hole which vents
your heated air to the outdoors, you are going to save $$$$$$.
BTW, in case you are wondering, the skill levels needed to do this
installation are comperable to a combination of being able to do
automotive work (shocks, minor tune-ups, brakes, oil changes) and
home electrical work (new lighting installs, receptacles, various
home entertainment wiring..), and you mustn't be intimidated by
soot-faced oil-burner men asking you what the thing could ever be
used for. (The dudes that installed my heating system actually had
never seen one of these before.. theyonly do 60-or so new contructions
annually)
Any Qs on availablilty ( don't you want one yet??? ) just send me
VAXmail, as seen by the name above. (Sorry for the windage)
|
166.467 | some qns for -.1 | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Mon Jan 11 1988 15:13 | 4 |
| RE: -.1
Do you install them? Do you get the same quick 'win' if you have gas
heat (FHA or FHW)? and the biggie: Is it worth it if you expect to
replace your furnace in 2-3 years
|
166.468 | The Hot Scoop | SALEM::M_TAYLOR | | Mon Jan 11 1988 17:06 | 23 |
| Re: .8
I specialize in knowing my business, which is not any gas applications.
I'd have to say that a gas person should be able to honestly answer
that. (watch out for these guys, gas doesn't leave much soot!)
Sears catalog lists these devices, and I have seen them at somerville
lumber. I am not sure what savings they offer on a given unit, seeing
that a gas unit with a pilot needs venting, though, I'd have to
guess that they leave a little bit of the damper cut out, in order
to maintain a constant draft, however small.
Again, the savings depend on YOUR level of air infiltration. If
your flue pipe is always warm on an oil burning unit at a distance
of 3-4 feet from the unit, chances are that you are losing heat
up the chimney. On gas, you have a air-mix arrangement above the
furnace that will always lower the apparent temp of that pipe, so
that test would not be usable here.
Give the gas folks a call and let us all know how they responded.
Mike
|
166.16 | Broken piece of flue liner.... | SHOOTR::AHO | Uncle Mike | Thu Mar 10 1988 09:03 | 13 |
|
Since the topic has started I'll enter my "Problem" here.
Last night I opened up my cleanout to my chimney as I was in the
process of cleaning it (wood/oil combo). I found a piece of flue
liner approx 6" long by 2" wide. Is this a MAJOR problem? What/who
do I contact to "repair" it?
Thanks for any help.
Mike
|
166.17 | I'd get it fixed | MIZZEN::DEMERS | Do the workstation thing | Thu Mar 17 1988 14:37 | 4 |
| re .16
Losing part of your lining can be a problem. Creosote is very potent
and will quickly eat away a masonry chimney. Chimneys can be relined,
check the yellow pages.
|
166.138 | Brick chimney above the roof only? | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Mar 29 1988 21:15 | 30 |
| Does anyone know if it's possible to build a brick chimney that isn't
supported on the ground?
I'm thinking about putting a fireplace (zero-clearance) in my new bedroom but
the looks of a metal chimney just won't make it and I don't want wood either.
I was thinking I could run stove pipe and then surround it with real brick.
Since the actual brick part would only be around 6-8 feet high (I haven't
actually bothered to measure it) it wouldn't weigh THAT much and it would sit
on a roof framed with 2X12's.
Another possibility I also thought of was maybe to use some kind of fake brick
but I don't know how well that would handle the weather.
What you're looking at below is a jog in the second floor (a common practice on
a lot of colonials). The back roof-lines match and the front roof is recessed
around 8-feet back. The chimney would sit on the smaller roof.
| |
/| |
/ | |
/ | / \
/ |/ \
/ / \
/ / \
| | |
| | |
| | |
-mark
|
166.139 | Back of the envelope calculation. | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | House < $200k = Mass. Miracle | Wed Mar 30 1988 10:24 | 9 |
| An approximate weight estimate for a 6' to 8' chiminey 16" outside
(8" inches inside) would range from 1000 lbs (6' assuming 125 lbs/cu
ft density for brick) to 1600 lbs (8' assuming 150 lbs/cu ft density
for brick) This is for brick and mortar. I have made no estimate
for a clay liner, etc. As I haven't weighed any bricks lately, this
is a ball park estimate. I am not sure you want to add a point load
of 1000-1600 lbs to a roof not structurally designed for it.
Stan
|
166.140 | good guess | PSTJTT::TABER | Do not be ruled by thumbs | Wed Mar 30 1988 10:59 | 8 |
| > As I haven't weighed any bricks lately, this
> is a ball park estimate.
You know your ball parks... The Wiley Engineer's Desk Reference (no
relation to the coyote, I hope.) lists the nominal weight of bricks
as 100-150 lbs per cubic foot and hard mortar as 103 lbs per cubic foot.
>>>==>PStJTT
|
166.141 | Not your average computer hacker... | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | House < $200k = Mass. Miracle | Wed Mar 30 1988 12:08 | 4 |
| Well, I confess, I did get a Civil Engineering degree and still
remember some densities roughly.
Stan (BSCE, MSOE) (OE => Ocean Engineering)
|
166.142 | | MYVAX::DIAMOND | Not one of the Beasty Boys | Wed Mar 30 1988 13:40 | 5 |
|
I would check with the local firedepartment. What you are doing
I'm sure does not meet any firecode.
Mike
|
166.143 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Mar 30 1988 18:48 | 8 |
| I didn't realize brick weigher THAT much. Oh well, it was just a thought.
Thanks for the feedback.
As far as the firecode, I'd be suprised if that was a problem since lots of
houses have wooden chimneys. I was simply going to go one better and face it
with brick.
-mark
|
166.144 | Try a pseudo brick | VLNVAX::SUMNER | Senility has set in | Wed Mar 30 1988 21:08 | 6 |
| One of my neighbors built a wooden box around his chimney and
faced it with 1/2"-thick brick. It almost looks real if you use the
right type of brick.
Glenn
|
166.146 | chimney BLOCK to BRICK | 27769::BUTLER | | Thu Mar 31 1988 08:42 | 21 |
|
I would like some recommendations on upgrading my chimney. I have
scoured all the books but my problem is not mentioned.
I would like to take my old block chimney down below the roof into
the actic. Then start up again with red brick. I know this can be done
since I have seen new ones do just this.
any suggestions ? techniques etc would be helpful.
Is there a special last block to buy BEFORE starting the red brick.
I have been trying to picture this first layer of brick resting on
the block, but it would seem too unstable. The old chimney is about 30
years young, and now supports an oil burner and lp gas water heater.
And it also has a liner.
Thanks in advance to all.
al
|
166.147 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Mar 31 1988 09:55 | 8 |
| ? I don't see why you think brick on block would be unstable. The
chimney blocks are solid concrete, assuming you have what I think
you have. Just start laying up the bricks. By the way, the tile
flue liner should be free-floating; it should *NOT* be mortared
into place. It has to be free to expand and contract with heat
and cold, or it will crack. You can fill the space between the
liner and the concrete or brick with Vermiculite, to hold the liner
steady, if you need to.
|
166.148 | | SAGE::FLEURY | | Fri Apr 01 1988 10:13 | 8 |
| Be careful about using Vermiculite, it is not legal in some towns.
The alternative is to use a product called Thermix which is vermiculite
bound with an adhesive. The reason for straight Vermiculite not
being up to code is due to fire codes. It seems that if a flue
tile cracks and falls, the vermiculite can pour down the chimney,
blocking it and causing the smoke to enter the house.
Dan
|
166.149 | Smoke through sides of chimney | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Mon Apr 04 1988 09:16 | 15 |
| What is this caused by?
Yesterday, I looked up at my chimney from outside my house and saw
smoke coming from between the flashing and the shingles around the
chimney. I had my woodstove going.
I thought that seemed strange since usually the smoke comes out
from the top of the chimney.
So I went up in my attic, and there was smoke pouring out from
between 2 cinder blocks which enclose the flue.
One of the blocks was cracked. The blocks above the crack were
very warm.
My guess is that the chimney liner cracked, and smoke got
to the cinderblocks, heated it up, and cracked one of them.
Is this going to require tearing down the chimney to the point
of the crack?
|
166.150 | Fire Hazard | NSSG::FEINSMITH | | Mon Apr 04 1988 17:11 | 6 |
| I don't know if it requires a complete rebuild, but you have 1 hell
of a fire hazard existing! I would suggest repairs asap or at least
stop using the wood stove.
Eric-watched a neighbor's house roast that way
|
166.151 | I'd say repair both flue and cinderblocks | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | DECnet-VAX | Mon Apr 04 1988 18:26 | 18 |
| .1 is right - under no circumstances use that wood stove again
until the problem is corrected. Fortunately, we're past the main
heating season for woodstoves.
The problem might have been caused by a small chimney fire -
do you use the "run it real hot occasionally to burn out any
buildup" technique of chimney maintenance?
In any event, you've definitely got a cracked flue, and if you
were to have a chimney fire, you can view your roof rafters as
readily available kindling...
Not to mention the fact that as wood is heated over time, its
flash point decreases. The crack in the flue means more heat
escapes the flue to warm the cinderblocks; the crack in the
cinderblocks means the adjacent wood is being heated, and if
it's heated enough, it dries out more, its flash point decreases,
and it takes less of a spark to get it to ignite.
|
166.152 | Am I in good hands with Metpay? | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Apr 07 1988 12:57 | 8 |
| > My guess is that the chimney liner cracked, and smoke got
> to the cinderblocks, heated it up, and cracked one of them.
Do you think I can get insurance money for this? Assuming it
was caused by a small chimney fire (I'm sure it was) then
it's fire damage.
Any experience with anything like this?
|
166.153 | maybe yes.... | CVG::ESONIS | What now? | Thu Apr 07 1988 13:07 | 5 |
|
I had my chimney re-lined courtesy of homeowners insurance...
probably depends on your company and/or policy.
|
166.154 | | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Thu Apr 07 1988 13:46 | 5 |
| RE: .4
What were the circumstances? Did you actually have a fire?
Phil
|
166.155 | Metpay is giving us trouble | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Thu Apr 07 1988 14:21 | 22 |
| I have a similar problem and am fighting Metpay about this right
now. We also have a block chimney that has a crack running from
the point where the stove pipe comes out of the house up to the top
of the chimney. We had a small chimney fire late last year. Metpay
is trying to say that it is a structural problem. My argument against
that is why did it take five years to come about? It seems awful
strange that the crack developed right after the chimney fire.
They have sent out 3 adjusters. The first guy came out and said,
"I don't know why they sent me out here, I only look at cars!"
I complained about this and they sent someone else out, who in turn
said that it was structural. Once again, I complained and asked
to have a supervisor come out. He came and concluded that it was
structural, but he would be willing to have a builder come with
him next time in an effort to prove this to me.
The mason who built the chimney has said there is no way it is a
structural problem. I am still awaiting their verdict.
Needless to say, do not use the chimney until it is fixed.
Steve
|
166.156 | Use channels...it works | WFOVX3::KOEHLER | The Fantasy Factory is open | Thu Apr 07 1988 14:44 | 6 |
| Steve,
Call Lisa Kane the Digital Corp. Personel leison. She has a direct
line to Metpay. I got a problem solved quickly thru her.
dtn 251-1232
Jim
|
166.157 | Chimney fire | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Apr 07 1988 14:53 | 8 |
| > -< Metpay is giving us trouble >-
> I have a similar problem and am fighting Metpay about this right
> now.
OK. Well, I'm about to call Metpay to claim the exact same thing.
I'll know what to expect. I'll let you know what happens.
|
166.158 | yup, there was a fire | CVG::ESONIS | What now? | Thu Apr 07 1988 17:35 | 19 |
| > RE: .4
>
> What were the circumstances? Did you actually have a fire?
Well..... I thought I heard a fire in there.... (external chimney
built from chimney blocks with tile liner). I called my agent
to ask about coverage, and they said "yes, you're covered", and
sent an adjuster out... the adjuster looked at the chimney from
the driveway, and somehow decided that we WERE entitled to have
it re-lined at their expense. My only mistake was that I went with
the stainless steel liner inside the blocks, and the space between
the liner and the blocks filled with vermiculite.... Having now
spent two seasons with this arrangement, I'm sorry I didn't have
it done with insulcrete... especially since it was at the expense
of insurance.....
|
166.159 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | the Gort | Thu Apr 07 1988 21:32 | 8 |
| You can usually hear a chimmney fire as they build a tremendous
draft in just a few seconds. I once put one once and I could hear
it over the firetruck engines when we pulled up. Water is not used
either dry chem or co2 is discharged into the fire box and is drawn
up the chimmney works real good too. BTW- The stack on top of the
house looked like a fountain cone on the 4th of july.
-j
|
166.160 | Typical Metpay BS... | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Did you see that?! | Fri Apr 08 1988 13:01 | 12 |
|
RE: Metnopay
Good luck! They don't pay money as easily as they take it out of
your check. Of course the crack is structural! But what was their
explanation for the CAUSE of the crack? Did they say your basement
floor is sagging (dig under it and install lally columns ;-)) or that
a very large pigeon landed on the top???
Maybe you can get a statement from the fire chief about the fire.
Phil
|
166.161 | Metpay | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Fri Apr 08 1988 14:15 | 11 |
| > -< Typical Metpay BS... >-
> Of course the crack is structural!
The appraiser is supposed to call today or monday.
Ok, I'll assume he's going to say it's structural. Isn't there
some office you can go to that handles complaints about insurance
companies not paying?
If my house burns down I will also have structural problems. Will
they pay then?
|
166.145 | Don't try airborn chimney | ERLANG::BLACK | | Tue Apr 12 1988 10:38 | 16 |
| One more vote: Don't try the bricks supported by the roof trick.
The fool that built our house "forgot" to put footings under the
family room chimney. Now, this is buggert than yours, since it
goes up two floors and through the roof, matbe 20 feet in all.
But it was sitting on a concrete slab with compacted (well, maybe)
fill beneath.
Suffice it to say, the slab cracked, the interior walls sank, and
the whole lot - chimney, slab, walls, bathroom - had to be torn
out and started over.
Why is there never time to do it right ...
Andrew
|
166.162 | Get a statement from a chimney sweep. | THE780::FARLEE | Juglito Ergo Sum | Thu Apr 14 1988 17:00 | 23 |
| I had a similar situation: chimney fire -> cracks in the chimney
My approach was to call out a chimney sweep who could tell immediately
that there had been a fire; the creosote looks much different
afterwards. He wrote up a statement saying that 1) there had been
a fire. 2) The fire caused the cracks in the chimney. 3) The cracks
could cause the house to burn down. And an estimate of the cost
of relining the chimney.
I took this to my insurance agent who had no problem with it.
I think the important points are: providing evidence that a FIRE
(which is covered) caused the damage, providing evidence that the
damage occurred during the coverage of your policy, and pointing
out that a chimney is a hell of a lot cheaper to replace than a
whole house!!
Since I have a wood stove, the relining consisted of running a piece
of insulated stovepipe down the length of the chimney and hooking
it up to the stove rather than letting the stove just dump into
the chimney. That way no stonework was required, and there was
minimal disruption of my life. Also this makes a woodstove
considerably more efficient. Total cost was around $600.
Kevin
|
166.163 | Metpay comes through...finally | SYSENG::MORGAN | | Mon Apr 25 1988 14:23 | 10 |
| I wanted to update the problem that was described in reply #6.
Got a call this morning from the Metpay supervisor that was handling
our case and it seems they've had a change in heart! They've agreed
to compensate us for the chimney. Even though it took 108 days
to settle this, I'm still relieved.
I'd like to thank Jim for suggesting to call Lisa Kane (although
as it turned out it wasn't necessary).
Steve
|
166.164 | Caulking surface cracks on cement toping in chimney. | CLOSUS::HOE | Colorado's the place to be. | Thu May 12 1988 12:10 | 9 |
| Did a search of Chimney and brick; no such note so here is at least
one.
The top of the chimney is capped with a layer of cement which is
starting to crack. My question is what can I use to "chink" up the
cracks? I have heard there's a silicon caulk that looks like cement
in texture and colour.
cal
|
166.165 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu May 12 1988 12:17 | 2 |
| Silicone caulk would probably work well...and on top of the chimney,
who cares what it looks like? Nobody will ever see it.
|
166.166 | | VLNVAX::HEDERSTEDT | T.B.S. | Thu May 12 1988 12:26 | 6 |
|
MY father has the same problem with his chimney.He has a cinder
block with cement coating.None of the cauking compounds worked
that well.The best was a silcone compound made for mason work.
Wayne
|
166.167 | Another chimney problem | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | It is all Katharevusa to me. | Thu May 12 1988 13:08 | 58 |
| I thought I would use this note as a spring board for a somewhat
related problem.
We have a chimney that leaks. All efforts to stop the leaks have
failed. An example of the leak is a slow drip...drip in the woodbox
and the fire box during heavy and prolonged rain. There is no (in
theory) direct connection between the woodbox and the outside or the
woodbox and the flue. In addition, during heavy and prolonged rains
the cinderblock base of the chimney becomes wet from leaking water.
The sills (even I know this is NOT good) near the base of the chimney
get damp. This has happened on both sides of the chimney. The roof
is slanted so that the water from the roof pours on the chimney. The
chimney has a nice fuzz of green moss on it. Of the 7 houses in
our immediate are constructed by this builder, at least 2 others
have these same problems (here is a chance for you to help me and
all my neighbors!).
So far I have used silicone caulk in an attempt to stop the leak(s).
I have found a few cracks that I have closed. I have run the silicone
caulk down the 'V' between the house siding and the chimney stack.
These efforts have seemingly slowed and reduced the leaks.
I have talked to the original mason and found out the following:
1) The builder was a cheap SOB (there is other evidence of this
fact) and used cheap brick. The brick used is porous and
the leaks are caused by the brick absorbing the water and
allowing it to pass inside.
2) The chimney was built in January. Antifreeze was added to
the mortar and a plastic enclosure was made in an attempt
to get the mortar to set properly.
The mason made the following suggetions:
1) Gutter to prevent the water from running on the chimney from
the roof. (this will be done)
2) Clean (moss removal) and seal the whole blasted chimney with
a masonary sealer.
I have several quetions for the DIYers:
1) Do you believe the mason about the bricks being porous enough
to pass the water? In other words, will his approach cure
my problem? These bricks are naturally the ones with 3 holes
in the middle.
2) Is the chimney itself sound given the conditions under which
it was constructed? Should I sue the pants off the builder?
I seriously consider doing this once a year when I find some
screw-up. The screw-ups are adding up and I may do this
at some point anyway.
3) Any other suggestions the DIYers may have will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Stan
|
166.168 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu May 12 1988 13:24 | 24 |
| Yes, there are really cheap (soft) bricks that might be porous
enough to absorb water; if you have them, they will probably
disintegrate in a few years from the freezing of water in them.
A good masonary sealer would help postpone that, and also (maybe)
help your leak problem. At any rate, putting on a coat of masonary
sealer is a pretty cheap thing to try, and probably worth doing.
It's not clear to me how you can put up a gutter to stop the rain
pouring onto the chimney; is the chimney somehow under the runoff
from the roof???
I assume you have something like this (abysmal graphics coming up):
^ _____ and you get leakage at point X where
/ \ | | the water runs down the roof and gets
/ \ | | backed up behind the chimney. If
/ \ | | that's the case,you can build what is
/ \X| | called a "cricket", which is sort of
/ \| | a miniature little gable roof between
| | | the main roof and the chimney, at 90
| | | degrees to the main roof. It would
fit in at point X and divert the water
to the sides, out around the chimney.
You'd have to shingle it and flash it into the chimney and the
main roof. Does that description make any sense to you?
|
166.169 | Try the sealer! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Fri May 13 1988 09:09 | 7 |
| I agree that your brick is possibly soaking up water. Sealing your
bricks may solve the problem all together. This can be easily and
inexpensively done by yourself. Pick up a a high quality masonry
sealer at a masonry supply store and just spray or brush it on.
Make sure the product you choose does not effect the glass on any
adjacent windows, Some masonry sealer, if splashed on your windows,
can be very difficult to remove.
|
166.170 | Details and beautiful pictures... | HPSVAX::SHURSKY | It is all Katharevusa to me. | Fri May 13 1988 10:40 | 36 |
| Thanks guys. I was trying to get a sanity check here. I thought
the mason was probably right. I do have a cricket. The builder
and I have checked it and it is probably OK. Steve, your abysmal
graphics were correct. More abysmal graphics coming up! From the
side it looks like:
_______
| |
------------------------| |--------------------------
| | | |
| | | Roof |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|_______________________| |_________________________|
| | | |
| ________| |________ |
| | | | | <slanted |
| | | | | bluestone |
| |_______| |_______| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
|______________|_____________________|_________________|
So the rain runs off the roof down the slanted bluestone (over some
silcone sealed joints at the end of the bluestone :-) and down the
body of the chimney.
Stan
|
166.171 | RAIN Gutters | LDP::BURKHART | | Fri May 13 1988 11:03 | 16 |
| re .6
Gutters should take care of 99% of your problem. I have a simaler
setup on my house except without the slanted bluestone area, (tripple
chimney instead) and I get some seapage between the house and chimney
where the water runs down the left/right sides. If/when I put up
gutters the only water I should be getting there is the normaly
amount the falls from the sky and not the additional 10x running
off the roof. Even if your cheap or can't afford full gutters just
putting up some gutter sections to divert the water so it does not
hit the slanted bluestone cap should do the trick.
Hope this helps...
...Dave
|
166.172 | TRY SEALER | FRAGLE::COTE | | Fri May 13 1988 13:18 | 4 |
| Try painting on a clear coat of thompson,s water seal over the bricks.
This most likely will work as I have done it myself. Bricks do absorb
water that is why masons soak bricks before laying them so the mortar
doesn't cure too rapidly.
|
166.127 | Final Status! | ERLANG::BLACK | | Mon May 16 1988 19:14 | 15 |
| In February we were still getting the musty smell. We figuredf
that it had to be coming from the brick.
Working from tthe inside, I:
rolled back the rug,
removed the previously soaked tack strip again,
filled the nail holes with silicon caulk,
wire brushed the brick, and
gave the whole dam thing two coats of Thompsons water seal.
Since then, no more smell.
Andrew
|
166.173 | See note 1107 | ERLANG::BLACK | | Mon May 16 1988 19:17 | 5 |
| See note 1107, parlicularly .last and .last-1, for what we did to
our chimney.
Andrew
|
166.174 | Clear siliconized caulk. | BSS::HOE | Colorado's the place to be. | Wed May 18 1988 11:21 | 5 |
| I ended up with a CLEAR siliconized calk that can be painted. I
tried a mortar calk and the grey color was a lot darker then the
cement mortar. The clear hardly showed for the 1/16" crack.
cal hoe
|
166.175 | Chimney Firebox Repair | FGVAXL::QUATTROCHI | | Mon Jul 25 1988 16:58 | 12 |
| I noticed a couple of bricks that were cracked in the firebox section
of my chimney. Once I started knocking out cracked bricks, it turned
into about 20 - 25 bricks that had to be replaced.
Being a fairly new homeowner, I've never done any work with bricks
before. Is this something I should do myself?? If yes, can anybody
recommend a good book or source of information. If no, can anybody
recommend a good contractor in the Manchester, NH area.
Thanks,
Doug
|
166.176 | CHIMNEY CAPS(WHERE TO BUY ???) | WOODRO::DHOULE | | Thu Sep 08 1988 12:42 | 11 |
|
DOES ANYONE KNOW WHERE I CAN BUY A CHIMNEY CAP ???? THE DIMENSIONS
OF MINE ARE 10 1/4" X 6 1/2". DO THEY COME IN ADJUSTABLE SIZES
OR DO YOU HAVE TO BUY EXACT MEASUREMENTS ??? I LIVE IN THE MASON
AND NASHUA N.H. AREAS.
THANKS
DON
WOODRO::DHOULE
|
166.177 | Can you cap this? | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Thu Sep 08 1988 13:57 | 8 |
| If you live in the MASON area, you should have no trouble finding
a chimney cap (snark! smirk!).
Seriously: Corriveau-Routhier in Nashua, if you can't find one at
the usual building supply centers.
pbm
|
166.178 | In Sunday flyer | FDCV30::CALCAGNI | A.F.F.A. | Thu Sep 08 1988 14:37 | 3 |
|
Channel Lumber had them on sale this week.
|
166.179 | Stove Barn 101A | FROSTY::LANOUE | Who said it's going to be easy | Mon Sep 12 1988 09:38 | 5 |
| The Stove barn on 101A in Amherst has then also. And the one's I
saw were adjustable. Be advised they are not cheap!!!!
Don
|
166.180 | More | MEIS::GARCEAU | | Tue Sep 13 1988 07:35 | 6 |
| A couple others...
Ames Dept. Store (surprised?)
County Stores (in Milford, NH)
Brian
|
166.185 | Filling lip between chimney and its pad | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Fri Nov 11 1988 13:07 | 34 |
| Our chimney is built on top of a concrete pad that is a couple of
inches wider than the chimney, leaving a lip. From the side, this
looks like:
House | Chimney |
| |
| |
| |
| |
__|__________!__ <- lip
|
Foundation and pad |
|
Our building inspector (John Cornell) suggested will fill the lip
at an angle, to prevent water from collecting and eventually damaging
the chimney. He suggested that we might even be able to find
triangular bricks, ready made for that purpose.
We've checked the large masonry supplies place in downtown Nashua,
and they said that such an item would have to be special ordered,
in large quantities. So, does anyone know whether such a brick
can be found, and if so, where?
If we can't use that idea, then what's the best way to fill this lip.
Should we try cutting brick to fit (possibly the most elegant, but also
the most labor intensive solution)? Should we get some thin
rectangular bricks, and install them at an angle with a large quantity
of mortar underneath? Or should we just fill the lip with cement
or mortar, and if so, exactly what type of compound should we use?
(The last is clearly the easiest solution, but also the least elegant.)
Gary
|
166.186 | -<fireplace lip>- | VLNVAX::BROCKELMAN | | Fri Nov 11 1988 13:54 | 6 |
| My fireplace/chimney was made the same way. The mason took
mortar and filled it in on an angle. It came out vey good
but, it has cracked and is needed to be done again.
ps. its also 9 years old.
dave
|
166.187 | use the mortar | FREDW::MATTHES | | Fri Nov 11 1988 14:02 | 3 |
| Mine was the same way. I just filled it with mortar. This was
3 years ago and noone notices (including myself) how inelegant it
is.
|
166.188 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Nov 11 1988 15:27 | 7 |
| You could always rent a masonary saw (the kind that has the water-
cooled blade) and cut the bricks yourself. I've never used one,
but I gather that they cut quite rapidly and it shouldn't take
too long to cut enough brick to do what you want to do.
However, I wouldn't bother; I'd just fill the angle with mortar.
As .2 says, you'll never notice and neither will anybody else.
|
166.189 | Grout vs Mortor | VAXWRK::BSMITH | I never leave home without it! | Tue Nov 15 1988 10:00 | 8 |
| I know this is unrelated, but I couldn't find a good note to post this as
a reply. I will be building a hearth later this week for my wood stove, and
I plan to use quarry tile for the floor part of the hearth. My question is
what would be a better material to fill in around the tiles for a finished look,
grout or mortor?? Is one easier to clean than the other, the reason I ask is
because I have never used grout, so I don't know what it is like to work with.
Brad.
|
166.190 | BRICK vs MORTAR | JULIET::MILLER_PA | Go for the Gold, 49ers | Fri Nov 18 1988 19:27 | 14 |
| RE: .0, .3...
The masonry (sp) saw is the best idea for the "elegant" look, however;
you may not want to spend that much time on the sawing if you want
a fast job. The saw cuts fast but it takes a few bricks to get
used to the action on the saw. Also, use the pre-formed side to
face out from the wall so that the sides are all uniform. When
you cut brick, sometimes it chips and leaves some holes, and if
they are on the back side, you can fill them with mortar/grout and
no one will know the difference.
Good luck!
Patrick
|
166.78 | Price for capping a chimney? | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Tue Dec 06 1988 11:17 | 8 |
| We had a chimneysweep out today to inspect the chimney in our new
(to us) house. He suggested putting a cap on the chimney to prevent
deterioration of the flue and to keep raccoons out. His price was
$250 for capping the chimney and doing some minor mortar repair
(he said it didn't need pointing, some silicone would do the job).
Is this price reasonable? Yeah, I know, get some other quotes.
Don't suggest DIY, I'm not fond of heights.
|
166.79 | Get another quote | SALEM::MOCCIA | | Tue Dec 06 1988 12:42 | 19 |
| Re .12
Sounds a bit high. Prevent deterioration of a (clay liner) flue?
What's to deteriorate? When's the last time you had a raccoon in
your chimney?
A cap would be a good idea if you live in a wooded area and use
a woodstove; it will prevent sparks from flying out of the flue.
If it's your normal furnace flue, a cap won't add any value.
Somewhere in this file there are comments on chimney sweeps and
chimney repair specialists. Check the keywords.
Yes, get another quote.
pbm
|
166.80 | Can you give us a labor/material breakdown? | PARITY::KLEBES | John F. Klebes | Tue Dec 06 1988 13:11 | 18 |
| SEE Note 2017.16
I had a chimney cap installed and re-pointed some masonry damage to
my chimney as well as had the chimney sweep chisel out a floor
to ceiling crack in my foundation while he was there.
I think it cost something like $120 total. We picked out
the chimney cap from a book he had (~ $45). and the rest was
labor and $10 for re-pointing materials. This was last April but it
should give you an idea of prices. Course I don't know
your chimney - does it have more then one flue?, need a special
type of cap?
I would find out how much of your quote is for the cap and how
much is labor. Can't be much more than 5 minutes labor putting
on the type of cap we bought.
-JFK-
|
166.81 | No doubt about it ... | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Tue Dec 06 1988 15:29 | 3 |
|
That's out of line!
|
166.82 | Thanks for verifying my suspicions | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Dec 08 1988 16:23 | 14 |
| We probably won't cap the chimney (at least for now, and certainly
not for $250).
According to the sweep who inspected, there was some deterioration
of the flue lining near the top (the house is 54 years old).
The previous owners didn't use the fireplace, but we intend to
(for atmosphere, not for heating).
We do have very aggressive raccoons in the area, and a friend of
a friend (elsewhere) had to have a wall ripped apart to get
a nest out of his chimney, so it's not unheard of. I even noticed
an ad in the yellow pages under "Chimneysweeps" that said "Raccoons
removed." But I assume we can smoke 'em out if they decide to live
there.
|
166.83 | Another thought on flue lining - no seams | LEVEL::REITH | | Thu Dec 08 1988 17:30 | 10 |
| Some friends of mine had their flue sealed by the contractor/installed
putting a large tube/balloon down the chimney and pumping mortar in
around it. This left an oval flue (which they claimed to have better
draft - no dead air in corners) and strengthened the chimney top to
bottom. They found out about this at a home show and it was all done
from the roof and basement (the only outlets that existed).
There's probably more info on this process elsewhere in the file (I
just haven't gone looking for it myself).
|
166.84 | a cheapie is about $20 | OFFHK::SCANLAND | Tubes, or not tubes? That is the question. | Fri Dec 09 1988 09:49 | 12 |
| Just had New England Chimney Sweeps (located in Fitchburg) out to clean
and inspect ours. I asked him about a cap at the request of the wife
(who had listened to one bird too many thrash about on the fireplace
smokeshelf).
He quoted me $45 for the black or $65 for the stainless cap plus $20
for labor (I don't do work off the ground unless it's an emergency, $20
is NOT an emergency). FWIW, the flue is 12" X 12".
On the other hand, our chimney needs no repair/repointing.
Chuck
|
166.85 | too high | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Fri Dec 09 1988 14:47 | 7 |
| Similarly, I have had to get one too many birds out of the wood
stove, so asked the chimney sweep about a new screened flue cap..
he said $35 plus $10 to install IF he was already out to clean
the chimney anyway...
so, i would think you could get the repointing, cap etal done
for MUCH less than the $250 you were quoted!
|
166.86 | | PDVAX::P_DAVIS | Peter Davis | Fri Dec 09 1988 16:16 | 12 |
| Re/ .16:
Racoons definitely do get into chimneys. I had a least one big one in
mine this past summer. Among the suggestions I got were:
- drop a Clorox-soaked rag down the chimney. (This was suggested
somewhere in this notes file, I believe.)
- put a radio in the fireplace and play loud rock music.
I wouldn't suggest smoking them out, or even opening the flue while
they're in there. Mine finally left by him (her?) self.
|
166.369 | Add on a fireplace - & yet another TOH digression | NHL::ROSE | | Wed Dec 14 1988 12:53 | 29 |
| I've checked keywords all over the place, but I couldn't find this
discussed anywhere....forgive me if its a duplication.
I'm considering adding a fireplace onto the living room of our new
Cape. Has anyone out there done this or considered it and upon
investigation decided against it? I want to get a better understanding
of what I'm really talking about when I say I want to do this....
The few things I know already are:
* It would be on the outside wall and it would require movement
of the radiator running the length (24') of that wall
* The floor layout is not typical cape - the L.R. runs front to
back. Where there would traditionally be a wall dividing the
space in half, there appears to be a supporting beam instead.
Could a fireplace be an interference to this support system?
* The tax assessor in town has already told me it will add $2100
onto his estimate of the value of the house, (I consider this
both a pro and a con).
Where would I find a reputable person to do the work (I've checked
ads and yellow pages under construction, etc - no one mentions this
skill specifically) Are there any cons other than the expense that
I should be considering? How much might the cost be (aside from
the arm and a leg the plumber will undoubtedly want to charge for
moving that radiator)?
Your inputs will be appreciated.....
Tamison
|
166.370 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Wed Dec 14 1988 13:33 | 5 |
| See note 817 for a discussion about how to insulate an exterior chimney.
See note 2017 for recommendations for masons.
Paul
|
166.371 | Mason, sledge hammer, and ... | PAMOLA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Wed Dec 14 1988 13:35 | 10 |
| > Where would I find a reputable person to do the work (I've checked
> ads and yellow pages under construction, etc - no one mentions this
> skill specifically)
You would look for Masons for the chimney work (I can recommend one,
but the farthest south he comes is Nashua, NH).
The $2100 added value sounds low to me, or, rather, I *think* it'll cost
more than that just to build the chimney, assuming it'll be at least 20' high
or so.
Knocking a hole in the wall sounds like a great DIY job! Gimme a sledge!
Oh, yeah, assuming you get some expert's OK regarding the load-bearing thingies.
|
166.372 | $$$ | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Wed Dec 14 1988 14:01 | 9 |
|
I too, think it will cost more than the 2100...like two to three
times more! depending of course on the type of stone/brick,
mantel work, and whether its floor-to-ceiling, etc...
I had a full brick fireplace quoted at $5k last year, so I went
with an insert instead--$900 plus labor (maybe $500???)
Don't know about your other issues...
|
166.373 | Cost <> Increase In Value | RICKS::SATOW | | Wed Dec 14 1988 14:22 | 9 |
| re: .2, .3
The base noter said that the value of the house would increase by
$2100, not that it would cost $2100. There are very few home
improvements that increase the value of the home by an amount even
approaching the cost, and some that actually decrease the value
(such as painting it fluorescent orange).
Clay
|
166.374 | Cost, value, and assessment | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Wed Dec 14 1988 14:34 | 13 |
| > The base noter said that the value of the house would increase by
> $2100, not that it would cost $2100.
No he didn't.
He said the tax assessment would increase by $2100.
Although there are several "home improvements" you can do that will
actually decrease the value of your home, there aren't many that
will decrease the assessment.
For example, it's possible that adding a swimming pool will decrease
the value (the amount you can get if you sell your house), but it
will always increase the tax assessment.
|
166.375 | Good Topic | AKOV13::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Wed Dec 14 1988 16:04 | 16 |
| This is a good topic. I am considering the same thing - adding
a fireplace to my older colonial. If you would, please keep up
posted about your progress, pitfalls found, costs, etc. This will
be helpful to myself and probably others.
As for the cost. The base noter did say that the assessment would
increase, not the value of the house or that it would cost that
much. It would be worth $5K to me to have a NICE fireplace. For
that, I would want to make sure it was as nice as I could. Somehow
a wood stove doesn't seem as nice.
By the way, what is an insert. I thought they went into EXISTING
fireplaces. Do they have some that are standalone also?
Ed..
|
166.376 | they are nice if done right | FREDW::MATTHES | half a bubble off plumb | Thu Dec 15 1988 07:21 | 21 |
| I didn't want to reply tothis topic but I'm so frustrated with my
fireplace I can't bite my toungue.
All my life I wanted a fireplace in my house. Now that I have one
it's a royal pain. It adds negative heat value. The room you're
in is radiantly warm but every other room suffers. That's where
the air comes from to feed the fire. Where does that come from?
All the little holes in the walls - thus very high air infiltration.
Now my house was built in '68. They weren't too concerned about
heat back then.
So my lesson for today is make sure the draft for the fireplace
comes from outside. The venting wraps around the firebox so that
it's preheated when it reaches the fire. Plan on using an insert
or a wood stove with a glass/screen door so that you get a fire
effect.
On second thought, since you're building a new fireplace, you build
it like you do an airtight stove. Tight insulated doors, air from
outside, well fitting damper. I've got to 'fix' mine. The easiest
way is to go the wood stove route.
|
166.377 | go with masonry | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Thu Dec 15 1988 07:42 | 15 |
| re: insert...
I suppose I should have said "zero clearance" fireplace...which
I think is what they are technically called. Typically the kind
of thing they put in a condo, where it doesnt have to be on an
outside wall, isn't as heavy, etc. They usually have gray
interiors (brick look) with black steel-like exterior, and
glass doors. once the mantel is installed it looks much like
a standard fireplace...except of course its not real brick....
well, anyway it was just a thought...but I agree that if one
has the money to "do it right" a full masonry fireplace vented
from the outside with appropriate circulating fans, full mantel,
etc is the way to go. !!
|
166.378 | Inserts explained...sort of.. 8^) | MISFIT::DEEP | Sometimes squeaky wheels get replaced! | Thu Dec 15 1988 09:52 | 33 |
| The advantage of an insert is that you will not suck air from all corners of
your house...(see earlier reply)...
The air for cumbustion comes from outside, and the air from the room
circulates around the outside of the firebox...THE ROOM AIR, AND THE FIRE,
NEVER MIX.
Crude drawing follows...
________________
< < < < \
______________ | The air in the chamber can move passivly, via
| ^| convection, or can be moved activly, via a fan.
| | I recommend the fan.
| ^|
fire box | | <--- Enclosure
| ^|
| | The firebox is connected to the chimney, and an
_____________| ^| outside air intake, and has tight fitting glass
> > > > | doors on the front. With the doors closed, all
________________/ of the air for cumbustion comes from outside.
The biggest mistake people seem to make with these systems is to leave the
doors open while the fire is burning. While this does seem to generate
more heat (its warm in front of the fireplace!)... it actually is very
inefficient, sucking all of the heat from the rest of the house, and blowing
it up the chimney.
Hope this helps...
Bob_who_made_fires_for_3_months_with_the_doors_open_before_someone_explained
_this_to_me! 8^)
|
166.87 | $20 too high | OFFHK::SCANLAND | Tubes, or not tubes? That is the question. | Thu Dec 15 1988 10:11 | 10 |
| In .18 I was mistaken on the cost of a cap (I just got my bill
yesterday).
>He quoted me $45 for the black or $65 for the stainless cap plus $20
>for labor
The black one was $25 and the stanless steel was $45. Installation was
$20. This for a 13" by 13" flue.
Chuck
|
166.379 | Fireplace net efficiency depends on temp of infiltrating air. | TALLIS::KOCH | Kevin Koch LTN1-2/B17 DTN226-6274 | Thu Dec 15 1988 10:42 | 10 |
| Fireplaces (that draw air from the room) are energy efficient above
about 20F and inefficient below about 20F.
If you don't want the rest of the house to get cold, open a window in
the fireplaced room a little. If you don't like that, then open the
door to the basement stairs.
In my case, with an established, hot fire, the living room will warm
up with the window open and the outside temperature above 15F. The rest
of the house stays warm.
|
166.380 | Other things to consider? | PBA::ROSE | | Thu Dec 15 1988 10:49 | 10 |
| Thanks to .6 - I didn't know what an insert was, either
and to .7 - because your response is exactly what I'm looking for.
Any time I think of a project I _think_ I want to do, I go off and
call 3700 professionals from out of the phone book, interview/get
estimates from 700 of them - all to understand the
associated costs, risks and benefits, options/choices, etc
of whatever project I'm considering at the time. I thought this
time I might be able to save myself some time and draw on you folks'
experience......
Anybody else got a "things to consider" list about this?
|
166.381 | I'd Take ZCF over Masonry! | DSTR08::SMICK | Van C. Smick | Fri Dec 16 1988 08:39 | 46 |
| re: Inserts, Zero Clearance Fireplaces, vs masonry
A zero clearance fireplace (ZCF) can look EXACTLY the same as a "real"
brick, marble, slate etc fireplace from the inside of the house and
it has some very significant energy advantages over a traditional masonry
fireplace.
There are two basic styles of ZCF. The most common is the one that was
described in earlier notes. It has air passages between the firebox
and the exterior of the fireplace and vents on the top/bottom or sides
of the firebox. This allows air from the house to circulate around
the firebox and back into the room. External air is provided to the
box to eliminate the loss of heated air up the chimney. The major
disadvantage of this style is the exposed black metal on the front or
sides of the firebox where the vents are located.
The second style of ZCF has no vents, and therefore has no black metal
which needs to be left exposed. It has real firebrick lining in the
firebox, and it has external air supply to keep it from sucking heated
interior air into the fire and up the chimney. From the inside of the
house, it is impossible to distinguish this fireplace from "the real
thing". I installed such a unit with a marble facing and hearth and
a wooden mantel. When the building inspector and fire chief came over
to do the final inspection they did not believe it was a metal fireplace
until they touched the underside of the top of the fireplace. From the outside
of the house, it is easier to tell because I built the chase out of wood
and covered it in the same siding as the house.
My reason for describing this is that from an energy perspective, the ZCF is
superior to even the best built masonry fireplace on an outside wall. You can
insulate a ZCF on an outside wall such that it will not conduct the cold from
the outside into the house. The typical brick fireplace passes the cold of the
outside into the interior of a house because there is no insulation between the
layers of brick. Brick is not a good insulator.
If you are talking about a fireplace in the interior of a house, where the
bricks can radiate heat to the surrounding rooms when the fire is going,
the energy issues become much less.
In addition, the cost of building a tight, masonry fireplace with a external
air supply, with a manual shut off for the vent, good tight fitting glass
doors, etc is going to cost 3 to 4 times as much.
Even if money were no object, I'd go with the ZCF to save the energy and
make the house more comfortable. But that's just my $.02 worth!
|
166.382 | INSTALLING ZERO CLEARANCE FIREPLACES | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Dec 16 1988 12:20 | 24 |
| I was going to get into this later in the winter when it better aligns with my
plans, but...
I too plan on putting in a zero clearance fireplace. My main reason is I want
to put one in a second floor bedroom and don't want to go through with the
expense of building a chimney AND giving up the real estate in the first floor
to do it.
I plan on putting the ZCF into an existing closet and running stove pipe up
through the attic. However, my big hangup is I want a real brick exterior to
better blend in with the roof and my answer is something like a BRICKMASTER
finish. I even talked to one of these folks at a shopping mall. The good news
is they can do it, the bad news is they estimated it would cost close to $700!
I assume that on such a small job they need to get a lot to make it worth their
while. Anybody know if you can get the materials and DIY?
My second issue is over preventing water from entering the chimney where the
stovepipe enters. Since a lot of houses already do this I suppose there's some
sort of gasket, but I haven't bothered to look for one yet.
I was tempted to write this as a separate note titled - INSTALLING ZC
FIREPLACES but elected to drop it in here.
-mark
|
166.88 | Have you had your afternoon coffee? | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Fri Dec 16 1988 14:39 | 6 |
|
RE: .22
Wake up, Bob! Reread note .21
-tm
|
166.89 | oops, I made a mistake, the real quote was $65 not $85 | OFFHK::SCANLAND | Tubes, or not tubes? That is the question. | Fri Dec 16 1988 14:46 | 15 |
|
Re> Re: >$20 too high
Yes, I was serious. However I think if you re-read it will be clearer. I
entered a reply (.18) in which I gave (incorrectly, from memory) a quote.
Turns out that it was $20 higher than what I was really charged. So I
entered a subsequent note saying so.
So, what "$20 too high" meant was that the first $ amount I gave was
$20 more than what was really quoted. It did not mean that I thought $20
was too much to pay. I suppose I could've titled the reply "oops, made
a mistake, the real quote was $65 not $85" - but there wasn't room, or
was there let's try it.
Chuck
|
166.383 | Price out real brick too. Don't just ASSuME $$$ | LEVEL::REITH | | Fri Dec 16 1988 15:15 | 4 |
| NE Brickmasters will save you weight but when we got quotes from a
place like them and a regular mason to do the same with real brick the
difference was minimal. Check real brick out too. It's cheaper than you
might think (or the Brickmaster stuff is more than you might imagine).
|
166.384 | | VLNVAX::SUMNER | Senility has set in | Fri Dec 16 1988 19:55 | 14 |
|
>> The base noter said that the value of the house would increase by
>> $2100, not that it would cost $2100.
> No he didn't.
> He said the tax assessment would increase by $2100.
Whilst we're nitting...
He is a she
:-)
|
166.385 | A straight shot for the ZCF | BTO::MORRIS_K | | Sat Dec 17 1988 11:35 | 15 |
| I have just moved into an unfinished house that I'm building. I
was originally planning on putting in a real nice woodstove/hearth/
chimney but began to consider a ZCF instead. In my original plan
I wanted to put the chimney outside on the south wall and insulate
it. When I began to consider the ZCF I learned that the ZCF and
all fireplaces require that there be no angles/bends between the
ZCF/fireplace and the chimney. I understand that some gentle
angles are permitted but nothing like 90 degree bends. In order
to do the ZCF in my house, I would need to do two things, either
place the ZCF inside the house as well as the chimney which then
impacts the living space on the second floor. This also means a new
pad in the cellar and possibly much greater masonry work inside.
Or cut a larger hole in the wall, build a bump out to house the
ZCF outside the house, with additional masonry etc. I'm now
considering the woodstove option again.
|
166.386 | | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Sun Dec 18 1988 20:53 | 13 |
| re: using brick instead of brickmaster
I'd LOVE to use real brick, I'd probably even take a crack of putting it up
myself. However, this is purely a case of weight. I've gotta believe to go
with real brick above the roof would require serious structural work below
probably including footings in the basement to hold it all up.
re: no bends in ZCF stovepipe
I admit I hadn't looked into this, but it sounds surprising to me. Isn't a
ZCF not a whole lot more than a fancy wood stove (sort of)?
-mark
|
166.387 | ZCF, Brick & Bends in chimney | DSTR08::SMICK | Van C. Smick | Mon Dec 19 1988 08:52 | 41 |
| RE: 2878.13
On the brick chimney, how tall a chimney are you planning? If I understand
your plans, the metal chimney will pierce the roof, so the brick is only
for the section above the roof. If the chimney is close to the peak
of the roof, you are not talking about a tall chimney. I'd think you could
do that yourself with the 1/4" bricks that are sold at Brewsters or other
home building supply places.
>My second issue is over preventing water from entering the chimney where the
>stovepipe enters.
The is a metal flange/gasket sold with the stove pipe that will take care
of this.
Note 2878.16
You can have upto a 30 degree bend in a ZCF chimney. That is enough to allow
you to have the fireplace in the house and get the chimney outside in the
first story.
Here's a crude drawing of what I mean:
++
||
||
|+-------------------------------------------+
|+-------------------------------------------+
||
||
\\ <-- 30 degree
\\
|\\
| \\ <-- 30 degree
| ||
|++++
|| |
|| |
++--+---------------------------------------+
+-------------------------------------------+
|
166.388 | avoiding most problems | MTWAIN::GREENMAN | | Mon Dec 19 1988 09:26 | 31 |
| You owe it to yourself to consider the option of putting in a large
wood stove that also functions like a fireplace; something like
the Vermont Castings Defiant. The point of a fireplace is to be
able to view a burning fire. You can do that very well with a
Defiant, which has large doors in the front. You can also close
those front doors, like when you're getting ready to go to bed,
and the stove will continue to make good heat without sucking the
heated air out of your house.
Finding a good mason who can put in an exterior chimney is one
thing. Finding a mason who can build a fireplace, with the attendant
firebox, smoke shelf, etc., and do it all right, is something else.
If it isn't done properly, it will suck a tremendous amount of air
out of your house and throw little heat. Getting the proportions
of the firebox, smoke shelf, flue angle, etc., right, is a combination
of art and science, requires large amounts of brick, and with the added
weight, requires a larger footer so the whole thing doesn't settle.
There was this Brit, back in the late 18th century, named (I think)
Rumsford, who made an exhaustive study of fireplaces and why most
of them didn't work very well. If you're determined to build a masonry
fireplace, look this guy up in the library and make sure your mason
has heard of him and knows how to build fireplaces according to
his formulas.
Or you could have the mason just lay in the chimney, the thimble,
and a nice brick hearth on which you set something like a Defiant
and be happy forever.
Just an opinion.
Charlie
|
166.389 | Great News | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue Dec 20 1988 09:29 | 18 |
| Wow. A ZCF! Never heard of it but it seems to be the answer to
my problem (retrofit without massive masonry and foundation work).
What is not clear to me is what one does on the outside wall? I
assume you have to cover the back of this thing. Is regular framing
with sheathing/siding adequate? What do you use for insulation
- is fiberglass adequate for contact with something hot.
The flue pipe must run up the outside of the house. I'd need a
hole in the roof eave overhang, I presume, or else I'd have a lot
of funny bends in the pipe. What kind of pipe is used? Can it
be encased with standard framing/sheathing/siding, too?
What do typical ZCFs cost? (uninstalled)
Jim
|
166.390 | Good stuff cheap | CURIE::KAISER | | Tue Dec 20 1988 09:48 | 17 |
|
I added a ZCF about 2 years ago (on an interior wall). I faced
it with marble--people are amazed when I tell them that the fireplace
was added (the house was built in 1908).
Zero Clearance means that the sides and back can be placed next
to combustible materials (studs, etc); so for an outside wall, you
would build a chase and insulate it.
I paid $600 for a 36" wide ZCF; the stove pipe (I used triple wall,
but double wall is ceapter) cost another $600 (I needed about 30').
I have been extremely happy with this solution; particularly when
the alternative was a mason who wanted $5,000 AND insisted that
the main carrying beam of the house would have to be cut in two!!
|
166.391 | Where does the pipe come out of the chase? | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue Dec 20 1988 10:07 | 6 |
| Why do you need n-wall stove pipe if the pipe runs up the outside
of the house? I guess if the outside chase encloses the pipe also
then you might need some fancier interior pipe, but if the pipe
is out in the open on the outside, do you need multiwall?
Jim
|
166.392 | It's cold in here! | LAVC::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Tue Dec 20 1988 13:17 | 6 |
| If single-wall pipe is run on the outside, the hot gases condense
against the cold walls of the pipe and creosote builds up rapidly.
Poor draft, a leaky pipe (due to rusting surfaces), or a chimney
fire are some likely results.
Jim
|
166.393 | WE CHOSE THE REAL THING | NBC::STEWART | | Tue Dec 20 1988 13:29 | 24 |
|
I to have looked into the ZCF and almost went with it. My problem
was getting someone to install it. I called masons and was told
that carpenters usually do the installations. When I called the
carpenters, most of them weren't to knowledegable about them. Then
I went the route of having a real masonary fireplace put in and
getting several estimates. I had 7 masons come and write estimates.
They ranged from $3800-7200. That's for a 38" wide, 28" high full
masoned fireplace and chimney. I chose a mason whose estimate was
$4000. He is licensed, which most are not and will be taking me
to some of the jobs he has done. He has also been in business for
over 25 years, learned from his father. I would of spent almost
the same for the ZCF because I would of needed a footing for the
stove going through the wall, a chimney to cover the pipe and the
bricks to cover the inside wall (our choice). So the amount of
masonary worked needed would almost be equal, so we chose the real
thing. The only outside cost is the glass front, the tools, the
wood grates. I didn't see much of a benefit with the ZCF except
the heat efficiency.
just my views,
DAN STEWART
|
166.394 | GO with an efficient ZCF | SYSEFS::MCCABE | Mgt is still your best entertainment value | Tue Dec 27 1988 12:22 | 40 |
| ZCF have many styles. There are a set of them that are designed
for energy efficiency. I'm building a new house and just put two
Majestic's in. With the fan they'll produce over 50K BYU's. No
special framing or support is required.
The stoves are about 25"x42"x54". 3/4" space to framing members
behind and above, 7/16" to the side. The triple pipe requires 2"
air clearance. Up to 3 elbows needed (w/ supports). No addtional
brackets needed up to 30 ft (straight shot).
Internal or external piping is fine. Outside air intake is easy
with a metal dryer venting kit.
You can make a nice formal fireplace in as little as a space 6'6", by
framing a 5" face wall (+1/2" spacing) on either side of the opening
and running the face to the ceiling. This leaves enough room for a
6x8" tile border and a mantle (using 1/2" sheetrock)
You need 28" on either side to combustable walls by most every fire
code. Metal fire stops are needed between floors (but not the roof).
Outside a plywood box (17"x17" min) sided to match the house (doesn't
weigh much so angled 2x4 bottom bracing is more than sufficient.
If you wanted to put it flush with an existing interior wall you make a
support foundation from piers joists and plywood (a 1" piece of rigid
foam would be a good idea as well) and rest the stove on that (weighs
about 250+ lbs). Build a balloon frame to a point 3' heigher than the
roof eave (2' over nearest projection etc), snap on the flue pipe, box
it in and side to match the house. Not a time comsuming DIY job.
I set one diagonally in a room with a cathedral ceiling and another
boxed in between the entry and bathroom doors in a master suite.
Only work needing more then me was a couple of people to carry the
damn things, and someone to steady the chimney box while I tacked
it in place.
-kevin
|
166.395 | Dryer Vent may not be good air intake | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Dec 28 1988 14:18 | 20 |
| ><<< Note 2878.25 by SYSEFS::MCCABE "Mgt is still your best entertainment value" >>>
>
> Outside air intake is easy with a metal dryer venting kit.
Careful, there. The dryer vents I've seen all have a flap that
gets blown open by the dryer exhaust. But the air for a fireplace
or stove will be moving in the other direction and will just close
that flap tight! So, you'll need to remove the flap. Probably good
to put some screen or wire mesh to keep out insects and various
critters.
I looked into this about a year ago for a project which is still
on hold. (Hope DEC stock goes up soon!) The appropriate components
for an external air source are available from the stove or
fireplace manufacturer and/or from a stove pipe/chimney
manufacturer. A "damper" to enable shutting off the air intake was
recommended.
I advise consulting with the dealer or, even better, the
manufacturer of your fireplace or stove.
|
166.396 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Dec 28 1988 14:23 | 7 |
| Another though on Dryer Vents for air intake. Most of these are
aluminum or plastic. Thats fine for the temperature that is found
in dryer exhaust. However, neither of these materials are
appropriate for any part of an air intake that will be close to a
fireplace or stove. Use steel pipe where it will or even might be
exposed to high heat. Better yet, use steel for the entier air
intake.
|
166.397 | Talk about a coincidence... | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | This Space For Rent | Wed Dec 28 1988 15:56 | 4 |
| Watch This Old House this Thursday, Saturday, or Sunday (12/29,12/31
or 1/1). They will be installing a ZCF.
Kathy
|
166.398 | "I'm Bob Villa, and welcome to this old Norm!"...8^) | MISFIT::DEEP | Sometimes squeaky wheels get replaced! | Thu Dec 29 1988 09:58 | 5 |
| re: .-1
Don't expect much from "This Old Bob". If the latest shows are any indication,
they won't show you how to do the install, but they'll give you a nice tour
of a ZCF manufacturing plant! 8^)
|
166.399 | | CUPMK::PHILBROOK | Chico's Daddy | Fri Dec 30 1988 11:05 | 7 |
| I saw TOH last night. I thought they did a nice job explaining
the ZCF and its installation.
The thing that really turned me on, though, was that $26,000. whirlpool
tub! I want one!!
Mike
|
166.400 | Rathole alert... | MISFIT::DEEP | Sometimes squeaky wheels get replaced! | Fri Dec 30 1988 11:19 | 24 |
| Gee, Mike... we musta saw different shows! 8^)
I thought they did a sh*tty job explaining how to install the ZCF... if fact,
they didn't explain the installation process at all! They explained the
operational principles involved, but we already knew those! 8^)
I wanted to see them put it in.
Is it me, or has This Old Bob turned into nothing more than a 30 minute
commercial? Seems more and more like they are using nothing but state-of-
the-art new fangled wizgizzies...
I guess I'm just jealous because I can't get Dr. Bose to wire my stereo for
me, or afford the closed circuit television over the jacuzzi to answer the
door from. 8-) I really don't care to know all about the particular
product that they use, I want to see HOW YOU DO IT! But if they just told
you how to do it, the manufacturer wouldn't donate the product, and the
poor homeowners wouldn't be able to afford the Bose sound system, custom
granite walls, high tech security system, motion activated light switches,
$26,000 jacuzzi you can fill from your car phone, et al aud infinitum!
Sheesh... (disassemble soapbox, sulk away tail between legs, and hope 1989
brings us a real honest-to-goodness DIY home improvement show)
|
166.401 | An expensive woodstove? | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Fri Dec 30 1988 12:32 | 13 |
|
RE: .31 Ditto!
From what was said, I concluded that ZCF = ZCWS (wood stove).
The cost was about $900, installed. But I suspect the installation
is the same as a wood stove.
But one thing caught me. When Big Bob asked why the air intake
was insulated, the guy said it was so it wouldn't make the floor
cold. Am I missing something here? Was he serious? It sounded
like hi-tech triple overkill to me.
Phil
|
166.402 | | BPOV02::S_JOHNSON | Buy guns, not butter | Fri Dec 30 1988 12:38 | 15 |
| re < Note 2878.31 by MISFIT::DEEP "Sometimes squeaky wheels get replaced!" >
I watched TOH last night, and agree with .31 that they did a shitty job
of explaining the installation. The thing I was waiting for them to show
was how to connect the flue to the outside, what precautions must be taken,
tips, etc.
I also agree that TOH has gone downhill this year. Bob is now a yuppie
who never gets his hands dirty. At least Norm still does some work.
And the current episode is all about new construction, hardly what the
name of the show implies.
|
166.403 | let's have some action on this! | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Fri Dec 30 1988 13:02 | 4 |
| So when are people gonna call channel to and complain? I've already done it and
perhaps is enough people call in they'll start getting the hint.
-mark
|
166.404 | You are the market, help influence the direction.. | OBSESS::COUGHLIN | Kathy Coughlin-Horvath | Fri Dec 30 1988 13:14 | 5 |
|
Just what I was going to say! If the station isn't getting complaints
from the viewers, they'll continue the direction they're going.
If the people stop watching they'll have no market. The dealers
certainly aren't going to complain!
|
166.405 | | MISFIT::DEEP | Sometimes squeaky wheels get replaced! | Fri Dec 30 1988 13:58 | 1 |
| Station address and telephone number please?
|
166.406 | ie., _very_ upmarket | HPSTEK::DVORAK | We're from the Govt & here to help U | Fri Dec 30 1988 23:10 | 17 |
|
I think that TOH is deliberately going after a different audience. In
the beginning, TOH showed you how to do things yourself. Now, they
show you what you can buy, and give a very superficial explanation of
how to do it. I suspect Channel 2 figured out that most of the people
who give them money have lots of money themselves, but not much time or
interest in DIY. So, they moved to a program style which gives the
Beefy and Buffet types lots of "concepts" and just enough technical
info so they don't feel like dorks when they talk to contractors.
Flame off, etc.
I saw something in Fine Wood Working which might be good for shutting
of an outside air inlet. It is called a gate, used in shop dust
collection systems. It looks like a guillotine valve, and is made of
cast aluminum. A 4" one lists for $15.00 from Wilke Machinery. (FWW
Jan/Feb issue, page 87)
|
166.407 | | CUPMK::PHILBROOK | Chico's Daddy | Sat Dec 31 1988 17:43 | 14 |
| Well, I guess we all get different things out of TOH. I certainly
don't watch it for a DIY show. I watch to be entertained. I love
work, I could watch it for hours. ;-)
Perhaps the ZCF explanation was lacking, but for what I wanted,
I was satisfied. I guess I really don't belong in HOME_WORK since
I'm the type who likes to keep my hands clean and pay someone else
to do the dirty work! 8-) However, I still enjoy learning from this
conference and do enjoy TOH. Who knows? Maybe someday I'll become
one of the real people and actually try a DIY project, then I can
join y'all in making my dissatisfaction for TOH known to Channel
2.
Mike
|
166.408 | New show coming | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Sun Jan 01 1989 12:24 | 7 |
| In the January issue of the Channel 2 program guide, there's a short
blurb about a new show that's coming on starring...Norm! He's
going to show how to build several projects, including a blanket
chest and some other things along that line. There are going to
be 13 segments. It sounds promising.
|
166.409 | at 7:30 | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Tue Jan 03 1989 08:35 | 5 |
|
....to continue the tangent...
I saw the GBH blurb too....starts 1/26 and will air before TOH on
channel 2...sounded pretty good!
|
166.410 | This old ZCF. 1st installment. | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Thu Jan 05 1989 09:49 | 34 |
| Well I just bought a ZCF (at Cambridge Alternative Power Co).
The price breakdown was approx:
Basic unit (36" firebox) $450
Brass surround w/glass doors 250
Blower 50
Grate 35
Pipe, flashing 230
Chimney cap w/spark arrestor 50
Total 1200
This is a circulating kind, so I get room heat plus fireplace all
for the above. Seems reasonable. I'll report back on how the
DIY installation went. First perusal of the instructions indicates
they are pretty cryptic. For one thing, this unit weighs 250 lbs
and most of that weight is toward the back of the unit (firebrick
etc), so it's going to need reasonable support underneath. Since
it's going on an outside wall, it can't just be cantilevered out
with only the 3-1/2" house framing to hold it in around the front
perimeter! So I gotta do something clever out there.
They wanted $55 for the outside air vent. You can do better with
dryer vent parts, as noted, if the unit is mounted in an outside
chase since it is only inches from the exterior. The $55 buys you
this long length of fancy flexible insulated hose which you might
want if you had to go a ways between the zcf and the exterior vent.
I got contradictory input on whether the chase should be insulated.
Since the zcf itself is quite insulated, it boils down to the effects
of running the first 7 feet of flue (double wall) through a cold
or warm space. Any takers on this one?
Jim
|
166.411 | I guess you're supposed to insulate it... | MISFIT::DEEP | Sometimes squeaky wheels get replaced! | Thu Jan 05 1989 10:09 | 9 |
|
I thought that insulating the chase gave you hotter gasses up the
stack, and less creosol (sp?) buildup in the flue, but thats just
based on what I read here, which is usually entered by people like
me who have experience on somethings, but an opinion on everything!
8-)
Bob
|
166.412 | Brace & Insulate, Insulate, Insulate | DSTR08::SMICK | Van C. Smick | Fri Jan 06 1989 08:25 | 51 |
| RE: .41
> it's going on an outside wall, it can't just be cantilevered out
> with only the 3-1/2" house framing to hold it in around the front
> perimeter! So I gotta do something clever out there.
I had the exact same installation and I built a platform out from the
house, supported by three 2x4s at a 45 degree angle.
+--------------+
H +-+------------+ The top frame was screwed into
O | | // the band joist with 6" bolts.
U | | //
S | | // Then the 2x4 for a chase were
E | | // attached to the platform and
| | // house.
| | //
| | //
| | //
| |//
| |/
| |
| |
+-+
By the way, you might want to consider how your design will look from the
outside. After I built the design above and enclosed it with insulation and
plywood, by SO said "That looks ugly. Let's continue the chase down to the
ground so it will look like a regular fireplace." Needless to say, I wish
that decision had been made before I went to all the work. I admit it
does look better now with concrete blocks and siding all the way down
to the level of the surrounding house.
> Since the zcf itself is quite insulated, it boils down to the effects
The reason a ZCF is insulated is to keep heat from the fire from causing
combustion of nearby materials. You still need to insulate between the ZCF
and the outside air! Otherwise when the ZCF is not in use it will conduct
the cold from outside into the house. (I wish I had put 6" of unfaced
fiberglas instead of 3" on mine, because I can still feel the coldness
when I touch the firebox.)
> I got contradictory input on whether the chase should be insulated.
The dealer I dealt with recommended multiple wall flue and an insulated
chase to keep the pipe warmer and thereby prevent creosote build-up. I
don't know if it was really true, but I did it. A side benefit was that I
could make sure that the cold air would not sneak down an uninsulated area
of the chase, onto the top of the metal firebox and thereby chill the
house!
|
166.413 | Mile high chimney zcf ???? | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Mon Jan 09 1989 16:57 | 28 |
| Whoa.
Hitch Number 1.
This thing is going into a chalet (45 degree roof). It's going
on a non-gable outside wall. So the chimney pokes through the eave
fairly close to the edge of the roof. BUT the instructions say
the top of the chimney has to be AT LEAST two feet higher than the
nearest roof surface ten feet away in a horizontal direction.
Well with a 45 degree roof and the flue at the lower end, that makes
the pipe 12 FEET OFF THE ROOF!!! Is this right?
/\
/ \ | 2'
/ \---10'--|
/ \ |
/ \ |
/ \ |
/ \ | 10'
/ \ |
/ \ |
/ \ |
/ \|
/ \
|
166.414 | Chimney height requirement | AKOV76::LAVIN | | Mon Jan 09 1989 17:15 | 8 |
| re .44
> Well with a 45 degree roof and the flue at the lower end, that makes
> the pipe 12 FEET OFF THE ROOF!!! Is this right?
It's right ! Every code I've heard of requires this height to keep
the sparks off the roof. Tough on the Capes and Chalets ...
|
166.415 | sparks can be contained | LAVC::CAHILL | Jim Cahill | Mon Jan 09 1989 17:42 | 6 |
| The extra height is not so much for keeping sparks off the roof as it
is for getting a good draft up the chimney. If it was just for sparks,
a simple spark arrester on the top of the chimney would take care of
that problem.
Jim
|
166.416 | | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue Jan 10 1989 09:12 | 14 |
| Inspection is not an issue. This is a cabin in a dink town with
no inspections (except plumbing, and then only drainage).
It will have a spark-arrestor cap. So that's not an issue either.
If the roof were flat, it would only need to be 2-3 feet high.
I was planning on about 6 feet. This seems a reasonable compromise.
Is that roof peak nearby really going to kill my draft?
At any rate, I can always add in more flue sections, but unless
someone is fairly sure it won't work, I'm starting with 6'.
Jim
|
166.417 | | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Tue Jan 10 1989 09:44 | 22 |
|
Re: .47 by Jim Swist
> Is that roof peak nearby really going to kill my draft?
It certainly could do that. If the wind comes across the roof ridge
from the side opposite the chimney, it can blow a strong downdraft
_into_ the chimney:
wind direction ===>-->--->\
^ \
/ \
/ \
/ \ |=|
/ \ | |
/ \ | |
/ \| |
Which way is the prevailing wind direction?
JP
|
166.418 | Drafts and Sparks | AKOV75::LAVIN | | Tue Jan 10 1989 09:57 | 16 |
| re .47 > ... can always add in more ...
The usual "rule of thumb" for height is about 15' total including whats
below the roof. Some people have made due with less. Trees or adjacent
roofs often play havoc with drafts but it's a case of your total
situation - stove/fireplace size, flue size, trees, roofs, wind,
compass direction of house, etc. You never know until you try.
re .46 > ... extra height for a good draft ...
I agree that additional height helps draft. However, I think that
the code requirement of " 3' above the roof at exit and 2' above
anything within 10' " relates to spark control as much as it does
to draft. Otherwise the code would have also have a minimum height
requirement. I've never seen one of those. Doesn't really matter
to me anyway, with my 30' stack ... (8-) !
|
166.419 | | CRAIG::YANKES | | Tue Jan 10 1989 11:51 | 12 |
|
Re: .47
You say that inspection is not an issue, so that instead of using the
code-mandated 12 foot flue you'll use 6 feet unless someone is fairly sure it
won't work. In your opinion, why does the code exist in the first place? To
give the inspectors something to do or to protect you from some perceived
danger? Even if there were no inspectors watching over my shoulders, if the
code told me to use 12 feet, I'd use 12 feet. Just my opinion -- especially
since I don't have to build or look at this 12 foot flue. :-)
-craig
|
166.420 | | CHART::CBUSKY | | Tue Jan 10 1989 13:09 | 10 |
| Re: .50, Re: .47 and
Re: attached garages and
Re: and others....
EXACTLY!
When are you people going to realize that the Building, Electrical and
Plumbing codes are there to protect YOU and YOUR property!
Charly
|
166.421 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Jan 10 1989 13:31 | 17 |
| <Speaking as a contributor to this conference>
re: The almighty codes
Some parts of the code are common sense. Some are not-so-common sense. Some
are nonsense. Not blindly following codes is not in itself irresponsible.
<Speaking as a moderator>
re: Validity of building codes
This topic has the potential of becoming a major rathole. If you want to
discuss the validity of building codes, see note 1111.61 for an appropriate
place. Any more replies to this note about the validity of inspections and
codes will be deleted.
Paul
|
166.422 | UBC extract on requirements......... | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Tue Jan 10 1989 14:16 | 23 |
| My 1976 (ok, so it is old but they selm downgrade requirements)
UBC states in chapter 37 section 3703 titled "chimney general"
part f. HEIGHT and TERMINATION says:
Every chimney shall extend above the roof and the highest elevation
of any part of a building as shown in table 37-b. For elevations
above 2000' the bulding offical shall be consulted in determining
the height of the chimney. [here in colorado springs the required
is 2' above the highest point of the home]
Most of the A-frame construction here has the chimney exiting thur
the roof 2-3' to either side of the peak. FWIW- I think this would
make cleaning from the top a ladder job vs cherry picker job too.
[picture wonderful graphic here]
[sorry but this terminal lacks a bit]
Table 37-b says 2' for home heating appliances and fireplace min.
above the highest point.
This means nothing of course if the inspector decides he likes it
different 8^)
Hope this helps, -J
|
166.423 | I am the inspector! | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue Jan 10 1989 16:28 | 0 |
166.424 | what about the cabin's insurability ? | CSC32::S_LEDOUX | AAAAAaaaaaHHHHHaaaaa...< Splat! > | Tue Jan 10 1989 17:58 | 12 |
| Jim, I know what it's like in a small town with little in the
way of inspectors. Matter of fact, I was discussing almost
the same sort of situation with a wood-stove-person. What HE
said was:
"Sure, it's not upto code but that wouldn't stop me
but I strongly advise you to contact your insurance company
and ask THEM, since it's ultimately their responsibility to
pay the bills when the house burns down."
Let us know what you decide.
Scott.
|
166.425 | priorities | OFFHK::SCANLAND | Tubes, or not tubes? That is the question. | Wed Jan 11 1989 09:33 | 15 |
| re .55 and others.
Excellent point on the insurance aspect. I guess it boils down to this
(in what I consider the order of priorities):
1. Is it safe?
2. Will the insurance company accept it?
3. Will it work?
With wood stoves/fireplace you can/should talk to the local fire chief
in the absence of an "official" building inspector.
chuck
|
166.426 | | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Wed Jan 11 1989 10:22 | 11 |
| Based on all this input, I'm going to add another 3' section of
pipe (this will also require some kind of bracing system - what
does one use these days - guy wires?).
That will put the top of the chimney 10' away from the nearest piece
of roof in a horizontal direction. I'll call that "close enough".
By the way, the code I was quoted (the one with the 10' horizontal
in it) does not agree with the UBC fragment quoted in an earlier reply.
The latter implies that the top of the chimney must be 2' above
any other part of the roof - this leaves lots of ambiguities.
|
166.427 | UL my ass! | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Jan 11 1989 19:21 | 13 |
| When I put up my stovepipe I needed to brace it and I noticed all those nice
metal poles I've seen used by many people on theirs. Silly me - I simply got
some electrical conduit and some metal straps from the local lumber yard and
built a very nice (and SOLID) brace for around $10!
When the time came to sell the house, the home inspector told me that since the
conduit is not UL approved, it had to go! That was the most retarded thing I
ever heard!
I guess my suggestion is long as you don't have a jerk looking at it, it's a
pretty cheap way to go and still get a good job out of it.
-mark
|
166.428 | | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Thu Jan 12 1989 06:21 | 6 |
| re.57
I dont recall anything about horizontal clearance but I'll check
later this AM when I get home and enter any requirements listed.
Sorry for any confussion..
-j
|
166.429 | .02 more on chimney height | AKOV68::LAVIN | | Thu Jan 12 1989 11:19 | 13 |
| I haven't seen a code yet that wasn't " 2' above any structure w/in 10'
and 3' above the point of exit ".
The companies that sell chimney pipe sell a bracket that attaches to
your chimney and is secured to the roof via lengths of -earlier note
acknowledged - supply it yourself conduit. A support is recommended
for every 5' of pipe above the exit point.
BTW, Consolidated Dutchwest has a nice "installation planner" guide
included in their catalog that has all of the information in this note
and then some. The prices are a little high but it's still a good
reference. You could probably get one by calling the store in Plymouth
MA.
|
166.430 | Still unresolved question... | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Thu Jan 19 1989 13:01 | 11 |
| With reference to insulating the chase...
I got the instruction manual for the ZCF.
It explicitly states NOT to insulate the chase - the theory being
that it will cause the inside of the chase to get too hot due to
inability to disappate heat from the portion of the flue which passes
through the chase.
Comments?
|
166.431 | Need to face off a fireplace | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Thu Mar 30 1989 18:56 | 40 |
| I'm not necessarily adding a fireplace, but attempting to finish
a fireplace. Figured this might be the place to get help.
What I have now is a fully operational fireplace with chimney
etc. It is constructed of cinder block. This not the most appealing
material in the world. The fireplace sits firmly on the concrete
slab. The structure is sound.
Basically, I'm looking at the face which is 8' tall by 6' in width.
All I want to do is put a decent looking brick appearance on it. I
don't want to go to the hassle of getting bricks, cutting them up
and laying them. Instead, I simply wanted to get some of those real
thin bricks with the mortar-like glue and stick them on there. I've
seen these before and could not tell they weren't real brick.
I live in the Seattle area. When I ask around here I get, "Oh, you
you mean Z-brick, they don't make that anymore."
Is this true?
Is there some way I can accomplish my goal without having a bricklayer
come in?
I've constructed the entire 1,000 square feet of interior living
space on one floor by myslef, yet this fireplace problem remains
unresolved and I've finished the walls etc etc etc. This is no
time to hire expensive labor.
By the way, I don't think we have brickmaster around here. From
what I've read here, I'm not gonna save any money with them either.
Anybody have any good ideas on this? National Z-brick like
distributors?
Help. I'm going to sheet rock right over the &%^^%^%( if I can't come up
with something.
Thanks,
/brett
|
166.432 | I've used it recently | ATSE::GOODWIN | | Tue Apr 04 1989 15:55 | 11 |
| I put up a whole bunch of z-brick about 3 years ago. It may not be in
all the places it used to be, but it is still around (unless something
happened in the last 3 years). I found it at a building supply place
in Maine, but if you check with enough building supply places they
should be able to find it. It might be easier to ask a builder or
carpenter, since they usually know where to find stuff. It's not the
cheapest stuff in the world, but it is cheaper and easier than real
bricks and mortar. There are a couple of brands around. Z-brick looks
and feels a lot like real brick. Some others look and feel like
genuine plastic - I don't personally care for them, but they may be
easier to find.
|
166.191 | Making vent hole in chimney | MEMORY::BERKSON | What do they make scratch from? | Tue Jun 20 1989 15:48 | 5 |
| How would I get a new water heater vent into an existing chimney? Would
it be as simple as banging a hole in the bricks, putting the vent in
and patching around the hole with some substance (what?)? Thanks.
Mitch
|
166.192 | I don't think so... | MISFIT::DEEP | Set hidden by moderator | Tue Jun 20 1989 16:50 | 14 |
|
I don't know too much about chimneys, but I think that's a definite
NO WAY, JOSE!
Seems to me I recall reading that if you try to vent two devices into the
same flu, that you may create a vacuum effect, and draw the fumes back
into the house, which could be fatal.
Of course, that's the extreme case.
Best to check with an expert.
Bob
|
166.193 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Jun 20 1989 17:37 | 14 |
| See notes 2638 and 3183 for discussions of the problems inherent in putting two
devices on one flue. Both of those, however, are discussing cases where either
the two holes already exist, or the chimney is not built yet. There is no
existing discussion about banging a hole in an existing chimney.
I imagine it will be impossible, because I'm sure that code will require you to
tap into a ceramic liner, and it would NOT be a good idea to try to break
through an existing liner - they are often free-standing within the chimney.
If you knocked it over, you'd have a major avalanche within the chimney (which
may take off your hands if they happen to be protruding into the chimney
interior), and which would then require the entire chimney to be demolished and
rebuilt.
Paul
|
166.194 | Certain combinations are (usually) allowed... | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Madman | Tue Jun 20 1989 17:54 | 10 |
| re .2:
Depends on what is being vented into the chimney. Certain combinations are
allowed, others are dangerous. Gas and oil into the same flue are OK (according
to a home inspector), but I believe wood and anything else is forbidden.
Check local zoning, certain areas have their own rules. Some require a separate
flue for everything.
-Mike
|
166.195 | Wood. No, gas! | MRFLEX::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Wed Jun 21 1989 07:53 | 12 |
| Oh, brother, here we go again.
Re: .-1
> Depends on what is being vented into the chimney. Certain combinations are
> allowed, others are dangerous. Gas and oil into the same flue are OK (according
> to a home inspector), but I believe wood and anything else is forbidden.
I'd heard that it's _gas_ that can't share a flue with anything else. One mason
I talked to has his wood stove and oil furnace on one flue (no claims about it
being inspected and approved, tho).
> Check local zoning, certain areas have their own rules.
Ditto. Final authority.
|
166.196 | cold chissel, drill, jack hammer ? | FRAGLE::STUART | tee many martoonies | Wed Jun 21 1989 11:36 | 14 |
|
To reply to the original question, use a cold chissel to break
through the chimmeny. Scroll out the approx. size hole you want
and work from there. It's a slow process where you gradually chip
away the cement and don't hit it too hard. If you have a large
drill you could put some pilot holes in with a cement bit.
As mentioned before, take extra caution with the tile liner, drill
holes in a circle then chip away the remaining tile.
first, check with the building inspector for the codes
ace
|
166.197 | Where did you "hear" this? | RAMBLR::MORONEY | Madman | Wed Jun 21 1989 12:15 | 18 |
| re .5:
>I'd heard that it's _gas_ that can't share a flue with anything else. One mason
>I talked to has his wood stove and oil furnace on one flue (no claims about it
>being inspected and approved, tho).
I hope you're wrong, as I have an oil furnace and gas water heater on the same
flue. The home inspector (John Cornell) said this was OK.
I personally can't see a problem sharing gas with oil. Gas and oil basically
just produce carbon dioxide and water, while coal and wood produce carbon
monoxide and (in the case of wood) creosote. Any cooling (air from another
flue) causes creosote to condense risking chimney fires, and we all know what
carbon monoxide will do if it escapes.
I'll check this out, however.
-Mike
|
166.198 | Drill and Chisel | KAYAK::GROSSO | | Wed Jun 21 1989 16:40 | 12 |
| In Nashua I was told I could connect the two gas hot water heater flues
together outside the stack and then run that into the chimney exhausting the
gas furnace. That was quite an improvement over the former arrangement where
the previous owner ran them into a chimney that was completed blocked with
wood ash from its former use as a wood stove chimney. I can't imagine that
they ever vented anywhere but into the basement.
There was no liner in the 85 year old brick chimney. I used a carbide bit
to drill a circle of holes and punched out the hole with a cold chissel.
There was collar fitting for the flue pipe that fit into the hole which I
cemented in place with some glop I bought at the plumbing/heating supply
house for that purpose.
|
166.201 | chimney pulling away from house | 1SHOT::HOULE | Steve, NM is the future! | Thu Aug 24 1989 15:38 | 20 |
| I think I have a real problem. Confirm it and I'll act real soon.
This is my first year in a sixteen year old house. The previous owner had a large
fireplace installed in the family room. Inside the width of the brick is 10ft.
It was installed within the last 5 years.
I noticed this spring that outside most of the fireplace is about 1-2" from the
house. That is, from about 4 ft from the ground I can see behind the fireplace
and the stack. I also can see mortar attached to the outside edges that look like
it once "filled" the space between the fireplace and the house.
So I'm worried that I might "lose" my fireplace; The relatives are afraid to
stand next to it!
Do I have a problem? If nothing else I should somehow fill/block off the space
so the NH snow/ice don't get in and push!
Recommendation for mansons in my area? (Amherst NH)
Thanks for your help, steve dtn:264-4429
|
166.202 | Mucho $$$ | OASS::B_RAMSEY | only in a Jeep... | Thu Aug 24 1989 21:35 | 25 |
| Sounds like the foundation for the chimney was not sufficient and has
settled which is causing the chimney to pull away from the house. Can
you say many $$$ to fix properly? I knew you could. In theory, you
could hire someone to jack up the low side, and pump concrete under the
low side, thereby creating a new foundation on the low side.
But what is causing the low side to be low. Was the foundation for the
chimney built on fill dirt and the dirt is still settling? Or is the
foundation settling because of water? Or is the foundation settling
because it is broken because it was insufficient for the weight of a
brick chimney?
How well will the chimney take to this kind of action? Well it might
lean back towards the house and be fine. It might break and tumble.
It might crack the liner and cause a fire hazard.
Should you fill in the gap between the house and the chimney? If
the chimney is not going to pull away from the house anymore, then
I would say yes. If you are going to have the chimney straightened,
then wait until it is in its final resting position before filling
in the gap.
Sounds like you need to have an structural engineer and a mason come
out and look it over. You might also want to have a "foundation fix-it
company" look it over.
|
166.203 | Have an engineer look at it!! | CSMET2::CHACE | I'm the NRA | Fri Aug 25 1989 10:17 | 10 |
|
Chimneys are NOT supposed to be attached to the house (code is
usually around 2" clearance from wood), but the siding is usually
brought right up to them for asthetics. However, your case sounds
extreme. It may be that the unit settled to this position 4 years
ago and will not move any more, but the best thing you can do at
this point is to follow the advice in .1 and have a structural engineer
check it out.
Kenny
|
166.204 | | ALLVAX::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Fri Aug 25 1989 11:04 | 9 |
|
I had a chimney built 2 years ago. The national code (that's what
the fire inspector went by) called for the chimney to be at least
1" from the house but no more then 2". And it WILL be attached to
the house every 4 feet by way of metal tiebacks. I don't think the
code has changed that much in 2 years.
Mike
|
166.205 | I meant that house and chimney don't really touch | CSMET2::CHACE | I'm the NRA | Fri Aug 25 1989 13:43 | 16 |
|
re: .3
You're right about the metal ties going from the mortar joints
back to the framing. What I meant was that the BRICKS are not really
attached to any wood. 200 years ago, the (center)chimney was a
structural member of a house. Beams went through parts of it, rested
on it, in short, it held up the house around it. That isn't done
anymore because of the risk of fire from heating up the surrounding
wood. The point being that the chimney is just "there" it doesn't
really hold up anything, and the ties are just to help insure that
it doesn't fall over! (though if it really wanted to it would probably
pull the wall down with it if allowed to)
Kenny
|
166.206 | We were lucky/We didn't buy it | CISM::LANDINGHAM | Mrs. Kip | Fri Aug 25 1989 16:23 | 23 |
| We *almost* bought an old [30+ yrs] house that had a similar problem. Our
nifty home inspector saw it, and pointed it out. Seems that the man who
built the house took alot of shortcuts, including one less support in the
basement than he was supposed to have. When we stripped the wallpaper off
in the master bedroom, we saw major cracks in the walls. When you walked
on the floor, you saw that it was sort of lopsided.
The inspector recommended a jack/lally [sp?] column to support that part
of the house. He said that we could never make it better, but could pre-
vent further damage.
THE HAPPY ENDING TO OUR STORY:
Fortunately for us, the title of the house was a total legal mess, in the
courts for well over 1.5 yrs. due to deceased relatives haunting all at-
tempts to buy the house!!!! We never bought it, and we're glad of it.
Good luck with your chimney; I hope you're able to enjoy many cozy fires
this winter!
P.S. We bought a wonderful house, complete with fireplace & chimney, and
no sagging floors or leaning chimneys!
|
166.207 | thands for the advice | 1SHOT::HOULE | Steve, NM is the future! | Mon Aug 28 1989 09:58 | 3 |
| hi,
I'll have someone come look at it. Also, I'll ask the previous owner.
I'll respond with my results. Thanks to all of you. steve
|
166.208 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Mon Aug 28 1989 10:33 | 4 |
| re .5:
You didn't buy it, yet you stripped the wallpaper? How would you like to
come to my house and look for cracks in the walls?
|
166.210 | chimney caps: copper vs. stainless | DECSIM::DEMBA | | Mon Oct 02 1989 10:31 | 26 |
| I am going to install a single chimney cap so that
it covers three flues. One is a 8X8 for a woodstove
in the basement, the second is a 8X12 flue for the
fireplace on the first floor and the third is a 8X8
flue for the oil burner.
The two chimney caps manufactured by this company are
made of stainless steel or copper. Both have lifetime
warrantees.
The copper appeals to me more because of color, I have
a copper roofed portico on the front of my house, so
I understand what color it will turn and about the risks
of copper stains. Price $100 stainless, $130 copper.
Copper roofs will last upwards of 75 years.
Taking into consideration the acids involved with
woodsmoke, does anybody have any data to the life of
a copper chimney cap as compared to the stainless?
Or what amount of time either of these caps will
last?
thanks, Steve
|
166.211 | | RAMBLR::MORONEY | It could be worse, but it'll take time. | Mon Oct 02 1989 10:50 | 5 |
| One problem with a chimney cap and a woodstove is that creosote will tend to
collect on it, often running down the outside of the chimney and on the roof,
leaving a black mess...
-Mike
|
166.212 | | HPSTEK::DVORAK | dtn 297-5386 | Mon Oct 02 1989 13:37 | 17 |
|
The life time of the SS will depend on what alloy it is. There are
very corrosion resistant grades and then there are less
expensive/easier to work grades. I suspect it will be very
difficult/impossible to find out what grade of SS is being used in
theses chimney caps. If the copper sheet is really solid copper,
without alloying elements (and this may be easier to verify by the
color) Then I would guess you are better off with the copper. If you
are really into corrosion resistance you may want to have a cap
fabricated out of titanium sheet. It is not as expensive as you might
think, I bought some Ti sheet a year ago and paid about $20 a square
foot or so. The working properties are similar to working stainless.
It can be cut/drilled with normal tools, but use lots of oil and a slow
cutting speed.
gjd
|
166.213 | who sells large caps? | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Mon Oct 02 1989 23:46 | 6 |
| re: .0
which company is it you're dealing with? i should be in the market for one
of these also.
craig
|
166.214 | will let you know... | DECSIM::DEMBA | | Tue Oct 03 1989 09:40 | 24 |
| re: .3
It is a wholesaler. They haven't asked for a dealer number
in my calls and said that they would take MasterCard so
I believe they will sell to me. I will let you know
there name and 800 number when I get mine.
By they way, I have been told that there is a special
paint (only in black) that will cover stainless. I will
probably go stainless now, and because it is not as soft
as copper.
So far, from what I gather, there is supposed to be 4"
of space between the highest flue tile and the lid of the
cap. But this seems to apply for only well drawing chimneys.
My highest flue tile is 3.5", so an 8" high cap will probably
do. When I call around and confirm this from one or two
more sources, I will order mine. I am hesistant because
I have a really good draft and don't want to screw it up.
Also, I think the 12" cap would look strange, along with
letting a lot of wind blown rain in.
Steve
|
166.209 | fill in the space -what to use | 1SHOT::HOULE | Steve, NM is the future! | Wed Oct 04 1989 10:33 | 14 |
| hi again,
well i didn't have the inspector come for the chimney. The previous owner said
the space between the chimney & house occurred one year after it was done and
hasn't moved since (3 years). Sooo
Now that winter is soon to come I would like reccommendations on what I should
do to seal off the space on either side of the chimney (about 15 ft each side
with a 2" space.
I want the easiest solution.
I thought of flashing screwed into the house and glued (liquid nails) to the
chimney. Then clauking the edges.
Any ideas, thanks, steve
|
166.181 | CENTRAL MASS Area? | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Wed Oct 11 1989 12:29 | 6 |
| How about some locations in the marlboro/northboro/central mass areas
for purchasing cimney caps. i checked out sommerville but they did not
have what i wanted. i also looked in the yellow pages but all i could find
was a ton of chimney sweepers. thanks.
-jim
|
166.182 | one source | DEMING::TADRY | | Wed Oct 11 1989 14:02 | 2 |
| I just bought a stainless steel one from Feens Country Living in Twin
City Mall in Leominster. It was about $45.00.
|
166.183 | | TEKVAX::KOPEC | I'm not. | Fri Oct 13 1989 08:34 | 7 |
| Spags carries the black ones. They don't always have 'em, tho..
ask in the grill aisle.
Delgreco Masonry Supplies in N'boro carries them too, for about
twice the price.
...tom
|
166.184 | Grossman's | CIMNET::MIKELIS | Just browsing through time... | Fri Oct 13 1989 12:44 | 8 |
| RE: last few.
Thanks for your help. I succumbed and bought
one at Grossman's for 30 bucks. I didn't see them
at Spag's lately and couldn't wait any longer. It's hard
to shop anywhere but Spag's, these days.
-jim
|
166.18 | How long does a tile chimney lining last? | AKOLD1::KUMOREK | | Mon Nov 06 1989 07:14 | 4 |
| Anyone have any ideas on how long a tile chimney lining should last in a flue
that is only used by an oil burner? We were told our's needs re-lining but the
house is only 30 years old -- is this timing about right? Or was the tile
probably installed incorrectly to begin with?
|
166.219 | Water problem in fireplace/chimney | NSSG::SMITH | Dave - Networks & Technologies | Mon Nov 06 1989 11:44 | 21 |
| I am having a water problem with my fireplace. The house is over 2 years
old and did not exhibit the problem until this past spring. I was getting
water in the fireplace when it rained. I had a chimney sweep come and inspect
the fireplace, flue, etc. He did not find anything wrong except a few small
holes at the top of the chimney (which he patched) and recommended a chimney
cap (which I installed). That solved the problem of water IN the fireplace.
However, I am now (I think I did before as well) getting a very large, very
wet spot on the outside of the chimney. The chimney is made of concrete
blocks and I am afraid that if I don't find out what the problem is quick,
it could freeze and heave. I've had several people recommend that I seal
the outside of the chimney with Thompson's or something. Others have suggested
it could be a flashing problem. There is a gap along the side of the chimney
that probably should be caulked as well.
What I am looking for is a recommendation for someone in the Nashua area
who can solve this problem. I'm not sure if I should call a mason or a
roofer or what. Talking to the builder or the mason who built it is like
talking to a wall. Any ideas?
Dave
|
166.220 | Sounds like settling..! | MADMXX::GROVER | | Mon Nov 06 1989 12:01 | 12 |
| First thing I'd do is to have an inspector look at the effected
area and have him make a recommendation. A Town/City inspector may
also be willing to offer a method for having the original builder
fix the problem (I say maybe).
It does sound like your house is settling.... your chimney one way
and your house another. You may also want to have someone check
the base of the chimney (ground level) to insure it is not shifting.
While figuring out a perminant solution, you might want to go with
the caulking/tar to get you through the wet/winter season.
|
166.19 | sounds like a snowjob... | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Mon Dec 11 1989 13:33 | 1 |
| It should last as long as the mortar holds things together.......
|
166.20 | WHAT'S CODE FOR CHIMNEY LINING? | AKOV11::JOYCE | | Tue Dec 19 1989 18:37 | 20 |
| Sorry if this is A) obvoius to the experts in the aduience or B)
addressed elsewhere. I looked, but found no direct references...
TRUE or FALSE:
The flue liners in a two-flue chimney (one for the oil burner, one for
the fireplace) must be separated all the way to the top of the chimney.
That is, Must the flue liners for both flues run the full height of the
chimney to conform to code?
When up on my roof last week to clean the chimney in our two
year old house, I discovered that the flue liners ran only up to the
eves. Above that, was nothing but the inside of the chimney.
Curiously, the very top of the chimney is capped much as you would
expect it to be, with two liners, side by each set in cement.
Am I illegal?
|
166.21 | I think that you are illegal | ERLANG::BLACK | | Fri Dec 22 1989 15:26 | 9 |
| Are you illegal? I would guess that you are. But the authority on this
is your local building inspector. If he says that you are illegal, you
should be able to get the builder to come back and fix it :-)
It sounds to me that the mason ran out of flue tiles when building the
chimney, and couldn't be bothered to come back the next day ...
Andrew
|
166.221 | Repairing leaks in stone chimney flashing? | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | practicing my J�tulling... | Wed Dec 27 1989 15:35 | 13 |
| I've looked at a number of the "leaks","flashing" and "chimney" notes,
but didn't find much of anything on "stopping leaks due to gaps in the
chimney flashing", so...
I have a new house, and the stone chimney is flashed with lead (?)
sheet. The roof has settled a bit, I guess, and the flashing has pulled
away leaving daylight showing inside the house. Oooops. I have heard
that the flashing is applied by hammering the lead so that it conforms
to the stone; should I just go up there and repeat that process? Should
some form of caulking be used in conjunction/instead? Should I let a pro
go after it?
ken- tired of having the rain & snow & cold air in the house...
|
166.222 | Nobdy knows anything about this? | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | practicing my J�tulling... | Fri Jan 05 1990 14:32 | 6 |
| > -< Repairing leaks in stone chimney flashing? >-
re: .0
Gee, nobody's ever done chimney flashing????
Oh, well, I guess if I figure out how to do it I'll report back here...
ken
|
166.223 | DIY | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Fri Jan 05 1990 15:34 | 5 |
| Bend the flashing back and goop the hell out of it with asphalt-based
roofing compound available at any hardware of homeowner's store.
Piece of cake. Except don't get that black goop where you don't want
it!
|
166.224 | Flash it right, and you don't need TAR | KITS::AREY | Proofreader for a Skywriting Company | Fri Jan 05 1990 19:49 | 12 |
| "Goop" can lead to "Oops" if you're not careful. The goop cracks when
the when the weather gets cold or it gets old and dry.
The A-#1 method is to STEP-FLASH the shingles to the side of the
chimney, then COUNTER-FLASH the step-flashing with the lead flashing.
Wish I could draw a picture... A good flashing job needs no tar, goop,
or "monkey-dung".
The problem with "doing it right" means that you'll have to dig out the
old step flashing and that can be a bummer, so GOOP it! :-}
Don
|
166.215 | copper turns green... | JACKAL::FRITSCHER | | Wed Jan 10 1990 12:46 | 7 |
| Your copper color would not last long....it will turn green
after a while, unless you get up on the roof and polish it.
The stainless that is used for most of these kind of parts will
last much longer than you, there should not be any need to treat
it with anything....use flashing as an example....which would likely
be of thinner material than that of the cap.
|
166.216 | $135 for 8X12 ...ripoff??? | BUFFER::LOMBARDI | Chuck Lombardi | Wed Jan 10 1990 14:25 | 10 |
| I just had Master Chimney Sweeps clean out my flue for $80. They also sold me
an 8x12 SS Cap for an additional $135. The only reason that I bought it was
that there was evidence of rust on the damper. I figured that $135 spent now
was cheaper than contracting the services of a mason.
Question: Is $135 outrageous for one of these babies?
Chuck_who_knows_alot_about_home_fixup_but_nothing_about_chimney_caps
|
166.217 | A bit steep. | DEMING::TADRY | | Fri Jan 12 1990 13:28 | 7 |
| If you bought the cap because of rust on the damper I think thats the
wrong reason. The damper is going to rust to some degree if you put
the cap on or not. The cap will keep water out of your chimney and
will help minimize downdrafts but moisture will still settle on the
damper and assoc metal parts so rusting will probably still happen.
As far as the price of the cap, I spent $47.00 on a S.S. cap that's 8"X8"
and I had to install it.
|
166.218 | stainless steel cap | WESTVW::LEE | Hans' & Kevins' Excellent Adventure | Fri Jan 12 1990 15:36 | 5 |
| I bought a single S.S cap for 2 12"x12" flues (right next to
each other) for $145 installed. I forget the exact size of the unit,
but it was something like 14"x30"
|
166.225 | That's what we wanted to know! | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | practicing my J�tulling... | Mon Jan 15 1990 15:38 | 7 |
| > The problem with "doing it right" means that you'll have to dig out the
> old step flashing and that can be a bummer, so GOOP it! :-}
Tanks, folks! Maybe I'll have at it when the weather gets balmier - I was
fired up before, but this last snow has drowned my enthusiasm molecules...
ken
|
166.226 | Relining a chimney! | WAGON::ELARAB | | Wed Feb 21 1990 23:47 | 11 |
|
I am having my chimney relined, can any one tell
me which is better?
1. Using clay tiles.
2. Using stainless steel.
Thanks a lot for your time.
M-
|
166.227 | | PAMOLA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Thu Feb 22 1990 07:21 | 12 |
| I would think clay tiles are better, longer-lasting, and, correctly made, better
able to withstand potential chimney fires.
I would also think stainless steel would be cheaper to install.
I can't imagine how anyone could reline a chimney with tile, though, without
tearing apart the original (maybe tile itself).
There are notes in here (ancient memory) about stainless relining, including
the method whereby "stuff" is poured down all around a stainless chimney,
completely filling the existing chimney space. This method, I think,
practically guarantees a chimney-fire-proof chimney.
|
166.364 | Chimney top removed and roofed over - how to replace? | BCVAXA::ERSKINE | | Thu Mar 22 1990 11:34 | 12 |
|
We just bought a house with a fireplace. The previous owner had
blocked the chimney when they were frightened by a squirrel coming
down the chimney. In addition, they snubbed the chimney at the
roof line, (I guess you could say they "capped it") and they
covered the area with the slate roof tiles.
my question is : Who do I call to put the chimney back on ?
DO I call a roofer or a mason ?
..rke
|
166.365 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Mar 22 1990 13:05 | 1 |
| A mason.
|
166.366 | How about the roof ? | GIAMEM::ERSKINE | | Thu Mar 22 1990 13:43 | 5 |
|
Great ! Will the mason be able to put the slate tiles back on
the roof ?
|
166.367 | You'll have to ask them | ISLNDS::ROBERTS | steel wheels and wheel guns | Thu Mar 22 1990 15:00 | 10 |
|
You will have to ask the Mason. When you start getting
the qoutes ask the mason then....be sure they can do the
roof. The one I know is very good and his skills cover
more than mixing mud and laying bricks.
Gary
|
166.368 | Mason for Chimeny, Roofer for roof | OASS::RAMSEY_B | Put the wet stuff on the red stuff | Thu Mar 22 1990 17:14 | 3 |
| Possibly but you may have to have a roofer skilled in installing slate
roofs come out and patch/fix your area. I agree that for chimney
repairs, a mason is your best place to start.
|
166.449 | Opening up new chimney flue hole | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Tue Aug 28 1990 13:26 | 19 |
|
Has anyone else done this ?
I'm finishing my basement and want to build a brick hearth for
my wood stove. I have a cinder block chimney sitting on a the
concrete slab in the basement.
I want to plug up the old opening and open up another one
a couple of feet lower.
1. Can it be done without collapsing the whole
chimney ?
2. Can I do it myself ?
Mike
----
|
166.450 | re: Opening up new chimney flue hole | OPUS::CLEMENCE | | Tue Aug 28 1990 13:49 | 33 |
| Mike,
You shouldn't have any trouble with the hearth.
> I want to plug up the old opening and open up another one
> a couple of feet lower.
Why? Is it because you can't get the upper clearance..
> 1. Can it be done without collapsing the whole
> chimney ?
Yes it can. It is a lot of work. Mainly in trying to re-seal
the old opening you got. You have to cover that with another
peice of flue tile. To do this you would need to match the
current hole in the tile with a new peice.
> 2. Can I do it myself ?
Yes it should be. It will mainly depend upon whether or
not you feel you could cut the hole, and do cement work.
If you have built a block or brick wall before you
should be able to do this.
If it were up to me I would assess the need to lower the hole.
If I absolutely need to have that hole lower, clearance
problem, I would do it myself.
Bill
|
166.451 | I should be all set... | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Tue Aug 28 1990 14:12 | 18 |
|
I currently have the a PVC soil pipe running about 7 inches
above the flue opening. I want to hide it with a drop ceiling
inorder to do that I need to either drop the opening or mar a
potentially attractive part of the room with a white PVC pipe.
One of the other DIYers who happens to work on the other side
of my building has read this note and graciously offerred to cut
the openning for me and show me the "proper" way to lay brick
too.
Thanks for your response Bill.
This file is great !
Mike
----
|
166.452 | Check with local fire officials. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Tue Aug 28 1990 14:46 | 10 |
| RE: .-1
Not to burst your bubble, but... You need 18" of clearance from the
top of the pipe to the ceiling. Having a PVC pipe over this is not a
good thing either. Prior to any work, talk to the local fire dept.
They are responsible for the fire end of code inforcement. Also,
setting up the system with their approval will eliminate any problems
with insurance coverage later on.
Dan
|
166.453 | Checked with Building Inspector | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Wed Aug 29 1990 12:38 | 17 |
|
I gave the building inspector for my town (Winchendon, Ma.) a
call. He's not aware of any minimum clearance from the top of
the waste pipe to the ceiling. He suggestted I speak to the
plumbing inspector if I wanted to be real sure, but since I'm
not planning on moving the wastepipe that shouldn't be an issue.
I asked about boxing the pipe in with a drop ceiling and he
said that shouldn't be a problem either.
BTW. I'm concerned about the insurance issue also that's why
I took out all the proper permits consequently all proper the
inspections.
Mike
----
|
166.454 | I think you asked the wrong question | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Wed Aug 29 1990 12:56 | 2 |
| I believe .5 was referring to 18" of clearance for the FLUE PIPE,
not the PVC PIPE.
|
166.455 | Clarification of .-2 | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Wed Aug 29 1990 13:08 | 8 |
| RE: .-1
Sorry if I wasn't clear. The 18" clearance required is for the STOVE
pipe not the waste pipe. I am assuming that the pipe exits the stove
and goes into a thimble which extends from the chimney. The highest
point of the pipe must be at least 18" down from the ceiling.
Dan
|
166.456 | The inspector did see it... | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Wed Aug 29 1990 13:25 | 20 |
|
Well... Either My house was built in violation of code or
that can't be right.
The house was built in 1988.
I've also been running a woodstove since then using the existing
opening. Inorder for Metpay to insure the house with the wood-stove
I needed to have a copy of a signed inspection to make sure the
everything was done properly.
This was done. There was never a mention of the PVC pipe being to
close, however, I did hang a 16X16 inch sheet of stainless steel
between the woodstove pipe and the PVC pipe for my own peice of
mind and I remember the inspector commenting that it wasn't necessary.
Mike
----
|
166.457 | | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Wed Aug 29 1990 13:36 | 11 |
|
.8 snuck in as I was writing.
I'll make sure the new flue opening will be at least 18 inches
from the the drop ceiling. (It'll also be the fire retardent type )
Thanks for the info.
Mike
----
|
166.458 | | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Wed Aug 29 1990 16:04 | 8 |
| re: .9
The 18" requirement was in effect as of the 1987 code, I think. Since
each town must adopt the code it wishes to enforce, I think its safe to
say that your house was built under the 1984 standard. My house in NH
was.
Dan
|
166.128 | Important to seal a brick chimney? | TOOK::GEISER | | Fri May 17 1991 17:07 | 15 |
| To open up an old topic with a slightly new twist...
How important is it to seal the bricks on your chimney? My Chimney
sweeps seem to find something else to try to sell us every year. A
few years ago it was a new stovepipe, which we installed. For a few
years, it was a chimney cap (which we finally installed after finding a
flying squirrel in our woodstove). Now, they want to put some sort of
sealant on our chimney - and they said explicitly NOT to use Thompson's
(because we would have to reapply every year).
So, how important is it to seal the outside of a brick chimney, and is
there anything we can apply ourselves?
Mair
|
166.234 | Chimney closings? | CADVAX::MCDONOUGH | | Mon Dec 02 1991 12:47 | 13 |
| I have a fireplace in my living room that has a dedicated flu. I do not
use the fireplace anymore and would like to close off the flu because I
feel that warm air must be excapeing from the house. I have closed the
dampers in the fireplace, but there must be a more air tight method.
I would like to keep the option of using the fireplace again in the
future so a permanent solution is not what I am looking for.
Are there products available ?
Is it legal?
Is it dangerouse?
Is it easy?
Any thoughts will be appreciated. Thanks.........Jim
|
166.235 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Dec 02 1991 13:53 | 11 |
| There is - when I was at the Home Show in Boston last month I saw a clever
chimney cap which had a chain running down to the fireplace. You pulled
on the chain and the cap closed tightly against the flue with a rubber seal.
I have the brochure at home and will enter more info about it. I want
at least one of these, but the installer who was promoting it was Boston-area
only.
You can also get foam blocks which push up into the flue opening to seal it
off, but I like the cap idea better.
Steve
|
166.236 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Dec 02 1991 14:21 | 17 |
| I did something for my parents that works quite well. I got a sheet
of .1" acrylic plastic at a glass store (it's the stuff they put in
storm door windows now) and cut it to fit exactly inside the wood trim
around the fireplace. I painted the back of the area that corresponds
to the opening black, and secured it in the opening with some heavy
clear tape around the edge. I needed to make up a wood block to
go across the bottom of the opening behind the plastic; I didn't have
to attach the block to anything, I just put a strip of wood across
the front of the opening, with a couple of strips going back to the
back of the fireplace, with a couple of bricks on them to keep the
whole assembly from sliding.
Anyway...it's pretty unobtrusive, and it certainly seals a lot better
than the flue damper. When the wind blows, the plastic buckles in and
out. Now that I think about it, I think I might have been able to slip
the top edge of the plastic under the edge of the moulding around the
bricks, but I'm not sure about that.
|
166.237 | Low tech solution | SSDEVO::JACKSON | Jim Jackson | Mon Dec 02 1991 16:56 | 4 |
| When I bought my current house, the previous owner had placed a piece of
plywood over the chimney, held in place with a couple of concrete blocks.
It seemed to block the chimney pretty well, was unobtrusive, and you can't
beat the cost.
|
166.238 | Warning -- hard hat area! | WLDBIL::KILGORE | DCU Elections -- Vote for a change... | Tue Dec 03 1991 09:06 | 9 |
|
Re .3:
There something about that much mass, that high, and loose, that makes
me cringe.
Of course, it also has the advantage of keeping the rain from
compacting the air in your chimney :-)
|
166.239 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Dec 03 1991 13:29 | 4 |
| Possibly one could suspend a weight from the sheet of plywood so
the weight was inside the chimney, rather than sitting on top.
(I share .4's apprehension of the whole thing blowing off at some
inopportune moment.)
|
166.240 | low-tech II | XANADU::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Tue Dec 03 1991 15:32 | 12 |
| Our chimney is rather large - 3 feet by 4 feet. The 12" square flue
ends flush with the top of the chimney. For the past two non-heating
seasons (our primary-heat wood stove is in the fireplace) we've covered
the flue with a piece of leftover particle board - a bit denser/heavier
I think than plywood. I leave a crack uncovered in case we
accidentally start up the stove but forget to remove the board.
You can't see the board from anywhere except when you're on the roof,
so it's not ugly. I'd guess that any wind wouldn't be enough to
"catch" the board, since its edges are "inside" the edges of the top of
the chimney. Yes, even a small-ish board like that - if it ever *does*
fall - can cause damage, but ... weigh the risks and costs.
|
166.241 | Lock-Top Damper | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:03 | 44 |
| Here's the info on the "Lock-Top Damper" made by Fireplace Technologies Inc.
Fireplace Technologies, Inc. has created the Lock-Top fireplace
damper to function both as a damper and chimney cap. A durable
construction of cast aluminum and stainless steel guarantees you
many years of usage.
Installation is simple and the damper can be easily controlled from
your fireplace. Six sizes are available so the Lock-Top can be
used with any chimney opening.
The Lock-Top damper will put an end to constant chimney problems and
is a necessity for your home.
- Non-restrictive - will not inhibit draw
- Seals out mammals, birds and insects
- Constructed of cast aluminum
- Easy to open and close
- Serves as chimney cap when open
- Prevents Heat and Air Conditioning loss
Sizes are 8x8, 8x13, 8x17, 13x13, 13x17, 17x17
The national distributor is Copperfield Chimney Supplies, 800-247-3305. If
you call them they'll put you in touch with a chimney sweep in your area who
does installations. I don't think they sell directly to the public.
The manufacturer is Fireplace Technologies Inc., 1715 Dixie Highway,
Louisville, KY 40210, 502-772-1067. I called them and spoke to a charming
woman named Laura who gave me the info about the distributor.
Also, if you're in the Boston area, "Boston's Best Chimney Sweep",
617-527-6777 installs them.
The damper cap is aluminum with some sort of soft seal, supported by
stainless steel spring wires. When you pull on the chain, the cap pulls down
against the wire spring tension and seals against the aluminum base. There
is a bracket which mounts inside the fireplace which latches the chain in
place.
|
166.242 | Another air shredder application | DDIF::FRIDAY | CDA: The Holodeck of the future | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:14 | 8 |
| re .4
>>>Of course, it also has the advantage of keeping the rain from
>>>compacting the air in your chimney :-)
Seems to me an air shredder would be a perfect solution to that
problem. :^]
|
166.243 | Air shredder is fine. What else will help | MARX::SULLIVAN | We have met the enemy, and they is us! | Wed Dec 04 1991 12:54 | 58 |
|
I hesitated entering a note about this since I figured I would have
to resurrect the infamous air shredder note. But since someone else broke the
ice...
I own a large colonial home with a center chimney. The chimney is
probably about 5' by 3', with 5 flues configured as;
-------------------------------------------------
| |
| +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ |
| +---+| | | | | | +---+ |
| | A || B | | C | | D | | E | |
| +---+| | | | | | +---+ |
| +-----+ +-----+ +-----+ |
| |
-------------------------------------------------
A = Oil/furnace flue
B = Living room fireplace
C+D = Large hearth family room fireplace
E = Propane fired water heater flue
My problem: We have had a woodstove in the family room for three
years, attached to flue D. It is a Consolidated Dutchwest
stove connected to the chimney via a stainless steel duct
inserted into the flue. The duct goes several feet into
the flue and then there is a collar which closes off the
rest of the hearth opening.
Starting this year (month) I have had water running
down the left hand side of the family room hearth.
Any time it rains or snows, and the stove is operating,
this happens. Didn't seem to happen during the summer.
It appears that it is running down flue C. During
my annual flue cleaning, I checked the chimney cap.
No cracks or changes since last year.
So... Any ideas why this would start happening now?
Any idea why it seems to be related to the use of the stove?
(Especially since it seems to be in the non-used flue. I'm
trying to avoid pulling out the insert to inspect because
it is a royal pain to install.
Finally, because of this and minor drafting problems when there
is a small inside/outside temperature differential, I have been
considering installing a cap. What I had in mind was building
pillars 3 or 4 bricks high on each corner, and in the middle,
then caping them with a piece of bluestone (better ideas
welcome) which is somehow bolted to the pillars. Is this
a crazy idea?
Mark
P.S. My air shredder, purchased at the now-defunct tackle counter at
Spags is working fine but does not seem to be helping.
|
166.244 | inflate a beach ball in the flue... | AKOCOA::CWALTERS | | Wed Dec 04 1991 14:06 | 15 |
|
Regarding the basenote, unless this is a traditional brick fireplace
there might be air inlets beneath or around the firebed which can also
cause drafts and allow heat to escape. In this case, sealing the
entire front with plexiglass is probably the best solution. One
problem with just capping a chimney is that there is potential for
moisture to condense inside the flue - a possible cause of wet rot in
the flooring members. try and seal it both ends if you can.
(condensation could be the problem in the previous note, depends on
how much water you are getting and when.)
Regards,
Colin
|
166.245 | Buy and install your own Top Damper | CHART::CBUSKY | | Wed Dec 04 1991 14:55 | 24 |
| > Here's the info on the "Lock-Top Damper" made by Fireplace Technologies Inc.
>
> The national distributor is Copperfield Chimney Supplies, 800-247-3305. If
> you call them they'll put you in touch with a chimney sweep in your area who
> does installations. I don't think they sell directly to the public.
No Need to pay a Chimney Sweep's inflated price. I just purchased one
of these myself (a different brand) this very afternoon!
Most masonary supply places seem to carry them. I got mine at Risi's
in Northboro Mass. The damper fits an 8"x12" flue and cost $70. Other
sizes are available. The brand I got fits the same description as the
previous one but is made by Lyemance International, Jefferson Ind.
Phone (812) 288-9953.
Installation looks pretty straight forward. Cement the cap to the top
of the flue and then drop the cable down to the fireplace. Down below,
you mount a bracket to the firebrick, attach pull chain to cable and
cut off the excess and you're done!
Kesseli & Morse in Worcester also had top dampers available but wanted
$90 for an 8X12".
Charly
|
166.246 | Leaky flue | CIMNET::MOCCIA | | Wed Dec 04 1991 15:09 | 10 |
| Re .9
We have similar problems - four-flue chimney, two fireplaces, furnace,
one "spare" and the spare leaks onto the living room hearth. If the
leak is external to the flue, it probably originates at the flashing.
If internal, you'll probably have to cap it, like we did. Rain only
entered when the storm came from a partcular direction.
PBM
|
166.247 | fiberglass insulation? | ISLNDS::BUCK | Infracaninophile | Fri Dec 06 1991 15:36 | 12 |
|
re: .0
How about just stuffing some fiberglass insulation into the chimney
flue from the fireplace? It's not so elegant, but who cares? I've
seen this done many times. It's simple, cheap, out of the way, and
whenever you want to use the fireplace just pull out the insulation
and fire it up.
agb
|
166.248 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Fri Dec 06 1991 16:23 | 6 |
| Brookstone sells a foam block which you push up into the flue opening to
seal it off. It has finger holes for easy removal. The cost is a bit higher
than I am willing to pay for a piece of foam (about $30, I think), but it's
simple and elegant.
Steve
|
166.249 | Fiberglass won't stop air infiltration | RGB::SEILER | Larry Seiler | Mon Dec 09 1991 09:42 | 18 |
| Fiberglass does a terrible job of insulation if air is flowing through it.
Some research lab did a test of the R value of a wall in which fiberglass
insulation was suspended between the walls, not touching either one. They
found that the effective insulation was about half the rated value, just
from convection currents inside the sealed cavity. If there had been gaps
in the wall and a pressure differential, the effective R value would have
probably dropped far more.
So if the air pressure inside and outside your house is different (which
is often the case), I don't think fiberglass won't do a lot of good in the
chimney. The best thing is to find a way to stop air infiltration, or at
least limit it to the level of, say, a reasonably tight window.
Enjoy,
Larry
PS -- As a side issue, fiberglass fibers are not such a pleasant thing to
have floating around in the living space. At least, they bother me.
|
166.349 | My Problem | EMDS::DOWSE | | Fri Jan 17 1992 15:16 | 25 |
| I have a split level 4 years old with a recent chimney problem.
I have creasote (SP?) and water mixed, at least that's what it
looks like, leaking into my downstairs. It also is leaking through
on the outside of the house as well. It seams to be soaking right
through the mortar where the bricks meet the foundation. Also it
is coming through where there are slight cracks in the foundation.
Now like I said the house is 4 years old and never did this before.
I've been cleaning it out the same as last year. I run a chimney
brush through it every other month. Usualy taking out about 3+ gal.
of crap. I also use that powdered SAFE-T-FLUE a couple times a week.
If anybody has seen this stuff it is like maple syrup and black like
tar. Worst of all it smells like creosote and I don't know how to
clean it off the foundation walls.
I don't have a chimney cap, if this makes any differance at all. I
have a fireplace on the first floor and a wood stove on the ground
floor. Each uses it's own flue in the same chimney. I rarely ever use
the fireplace. The problem is only on the side of the chimney which
the wood stove is on. The wood stove is burnig almost always.
1. What is causing this? 2. How do I stop it 3. How do I clean
up the mess? 4. Why me? Thanks, Jim - the new home home owner
|
166.350 | Whoops! | EMDS::DOWSE | | Fri Jan 17 1992 15:19 | 4 |
| Whoops! Sorry about that. My question should have been the original
note and not REPLY .3
Hang with me, I'm new at this. Jim
|
166.351 | QUIT BURNING NOW.... | BTOVT::CACCIA_S | the REAL steve | Mon Jan 20 1992 17:17 | 32 |
|
Jim, just a couple of thoughts;;;
�� 1. What is causing this?
Since the stove is burning almost always it does sound like it is
creosote.causes=== low flue temperatures;;; wet wood. this could be
just from having sat out in the rain and gotten soaked not
necessarily green or unseasoned. (hint does your wood fell a little
damp and is it real heavy?)
LEAKING THROUGH THE MORTAR::::::: Shut off the stove let it cool get
a chimney sweep or better yet the builder in there NOW to inspect for
cracked or missing liner. No way should it leak through anything if
it was done right.
2. How do I stop it?
PUT OUT THE FIRE�!�!� then see para 2 above.
3. How do I clean up the mess?
Check with a chimney sweep. It will be be more cost effective
(considering a nervous break down as the alternative)
4. Why me? Lucky I guess 8*)
Good luck. I had one OOLLD house where that started to happen on the
inside of the chimney in the attic. solution--- clean the
flue - repoint the mortar - install flue liner. ignore stuff on attic
chimney.
|
166.352 | Called the Sweep! | EMDS::DOWSE | | Thu Jan 23 1992 11:49 | 32 |
| Well....
I had a profesional chimney sweep come by and check it over. He told me
I was probably not burning hot enough. I've been going by one of those
woodstove magnatized thermometers that is supposed to show when your
burning good, too hot, or creating creasote. He basicaly said the thing
is junk and should not be put on the stove pipe like the directions
say you can but should only be placed on a stove top surface. The dial
says I'm o.k. to burn at about 225 or so. He says I should always burn
between 375 and 450.
Wet wood may also have alot to do with it. Although it doesn't seem wet
it does weigh a TON.
He explained that what was coming in onto the floor was a mixture of
condensation from inside the flue and creasote. He told me it is a pain
to clean up. I used speedy-dri and then oven cleaner and a wire brush.
He said the flash point on it is so high that where it was leaking
through wouldn't have created a problem. What was still in the chimney
on the other hand was another story.
I also had him clean the flue and chimney pipes from the stove.
To reply to RE .5 The leak isn't coming through the chimney but from
where the chimney ends and meets the foundation. Inside at that point
is where the collection is for all the ashes. On the inside is the
clean out door. It's only leeking at the end of the brickline on the
outside of the house and at the seam where the foundation wall meets
the floor on the inside. Luckily this is in my workshop and there are
no rugs or sub flooring.
Thanks for the info, Jim
|
166.353 | God for you! | BTOVT::CACCIA_S | the REAL steve | Thu Jan 23 1992 14:37 | 12 |
|
OKAY!! Don't you feel better now?
based on what you described I agree with the chimney sweep. And guess
what???? wet wood will burn a little cooler than good dry wood. If you
can hear it hissing like steam when it starts to burn it is wet. This
could cause some of the condensation . Stuff leaking out of the
clean-out is bad enough but at least it is not likely to burn because
it is below the level of the hottest part of the flue or chimney and
yes it does have a very high flash point there.
|
166.354 | Don't throw that guage away | KDCFS1::FRENCH | | Thu Jan 23 1992 18:19 | 15 |
|
I cann't help but throw my two cents in for what its worth .
I have be burnning wood in two stoves for 15 years so I do have
some experience .
Without a doubt wet wood increases the amount of cresote produced.
I only burn wood that has seasoned for at least one year.
Second is I use the thermoeter on the stove pipes , not for a
indication of creosote but for when the flue temp is getting too
hot and its time to shut the dampers down . I don't believe they
are junk at all but a cheap saftey device.
John
|
166.355 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Jan 27 1992 07:48 | 4 |
| Back when I was burning wood, I found a stack thermostat to be very
useful indeed. I'd also advise keeping the temperature over 300,
at least. 400 may be better. You need to ensure the moisture doesn't
condense out all the way to the top of the chimney.
|
166.356 | Convert the creosote... | GIAMEM::TRAINOR | Anchored in my driveway... | Tue Jan 28 1992 15:20 | 21 |
| Another alternative might be to get a catalytic converter for your
stove. I too heat entirely by wood, but have minimal problems with
creosote through the use of the catalytic converter. For about $125
you can get one for 8" or 6" stove pipe. It looks like a round honey
comb with a handle on it sitting in a short section of stove pipe. You
leave it open until the stack temperature reaches about 200f and then
turn it on. The stove surface temp goes up to about 600 to 700f, but
above the converter the temp remains about 200 and is almost all steam
with very little of the smell of smoke. According to the manual you
can actually burn all green wood. It actually makes a load of wood go
alot longer since you can close the damper down quite a bit and still
get the heat, as you are really only burning the smoke. The creosote
is converted to gases with lower flash points.
I still clean my chimney about every 2 months, but there is almost no
build up. I do have to brush the converter out though, because ash
builds up in it. The manual says that it will burn up to 95% of the
creosote.
So far, I have heated since the second week of Nov. on just over 4
cords of wood with the average temp about 68f. This is in New England.
|
166.357 | catalytic converter? | CVG::RENNICK | JACK | Wed Jan 29 1992 13:35 | 8 |
| Tell us more about the "catalytic converter". How's it work?
Does it use electricity or some kind of fuel? I hear that some
day we may all be required by &*^$%*^&*^ LAW to install one.
To cut down on creosote: burn dry wood and free burn twice a day.
(Old school)
Jack
|
166.358 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Wed Jan 29 1992 13:49 | 9 |
|
The catalytic converter works just like the one in your car. It's a
chemical reaction. The exact process I'm not sure of. As to it being
required, that's not true. The Fed's are/have required new stoves to
meet a certain smoke/polution cap. But this can be met with either a
catalytic or by some other means. I know of at least 2 stoves that meet
these requirements that don't have catalytic converters.
Mike
|
166.359 | How much do you burn? | EMDS::DOWSE | | Wed Jan 29 1992 18:09 | 11 |
| Sounds like alot of wood, 4 cords, already. I have a three bedroom
split level, good size, in New England, and I only need 4 cords for
the whole season. That's without any other means of heat.
I'ld be interested what some of you other noters burn in a season.
I always felt I burned alot. My wood stove is a 55 galon drum which
has been converted with one of those kits they sell in the mags. I
didn't make it but it throws a TON of heat! Best part is I can load
in some VERY long logs.
Thanks for all the info, Jim
|
166.360 | | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Thu Jan 30 1992 08:10 | 10 |
| We've gone thru about 1.5 cords heating a 24x32 cape. My stove is a
Consolidated Dutchwest catalytic/convection stove with blower. When the
blower is on, we balance the temperature by opening a few windows. The
catalyst is a platinum/ceramic unit that is in the stove. We rarely burn at
full tilt. As far as creosote buildup is concerned, it's really noticeable
inside the stove, however, we have our chimney cleaned every other year, and
the sweep is always amazed at how clean it is compared to what he thinks
it should look like after 2 years. On of the things I've noticed, too is that
when I walk thru the neighborhood, our chimney has the cleanest smoke around
(except when we forget to engage the catalyst).
|
166.361 | 4 cords... | WMOIS::VAINE | May fortune favor the foolish | Thu Jan 30 1992 11:31 | 11 |
| We go thru ~ 4 cord a year, heating a 30x45 split finished both floors.
I am "always cold" but this seems to keep the house toasty enough for
me. The oil is back-up, and we go thru about 400 gallons a year. That
figure is just a guess since we fill it 3 times during the year when
it's half down.
The stove is 13 year-old All-Niter, and we use fans to push the air
upstairs and to the other end of the house.
Lynn
|
166.362 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Thu Jan 30 1992 16:53 | 8 |
|
I own a duplex. My side is 1500/sq ft with 4 bedrooms and 1 & 3/4
baths. The house is only 7 years old. It was build with electric heat,
so the house is well insulated. I added 9" of insuation to the attic
for a grand total of 15". My total wood usage is 2.5 - 3 cords a year.
I keep the house at 65 - 70 throughout.
Mike
|
166.363 | a steady 68' | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Feb 05 1992 07:24 | 13 |
|
I have a 24x50, 20yr old ranch that I havnt totaly finished
referbing yet. A 10yr old Shannindowa (SP?) wood furnace and
an oil backup hot air system. I'm down to 4to5 cords during
the winter months and 3/4 of a tank of oil. I try to keep the
stack temp about 300'. The flue gets a once a year cleaning but
the 6ft of pipe gets it once a month. The wood is seasoned at
least 1 year if not more. I dont get much of a build up this
way and it cut down the amout of clean time.
JD
|
166.199 | Convert flu from fireplace to Furnace Vent? | SMURF::NEWHOUSE | | Mon Oct 26 1992 17:57 | 32 |
| This seems the right place to ask this since I have not seen it
elsewhere (yet).
I have a woodburning fireplace that has a single, lined flu up a brick
chimney. I am going to use the flu for my oil burning furnace.
I am going to run the vent pipe up from the basement through the floor
of the fireplace. The fireplace is then defunct and out of usage.
(Only the oil furnace will be making use of this flu).
My question is, after I run this vent pipe up through the brick floor
of the fireplace, up past the ledge/damper (sorry I don't know the
right names) of the fireplace and into the flu,
- how far do I run the vent pipe
- how do I secure it/seal it in place.
Background:
Bought a house with a 5 year old power-vented oil burning furnace.
Oil burning furnace gave it's all but power venter/poor maintenance
forced oil burning furnace to roll over and die.
At one time this now dead oil burning furnace was vented up said flu
through the floor of the chimney. Someone converted this to
power-venter and patched the floor of the chimney to make a, yet once
again, working flireplace.
Power venters have their place and mine ain't one of them.
This is a temp solution until I win megabucks and at that time build
another flu for the furnace.
Thanks -Tim
|
166.200 | You might want to.... | WECROW::SHURSKY | When life gives you footballs: punt. | Tue Oct 27 1992 08:24 | 7 |
| You might want to look into some modern flue components. You don't need to
use masonry anymore. Some stainless steel pipes used for wood stoves and the
like might allow you to put in a second flue for a few hundred dollars.
(compared to a couple of grand for a brick chimney.) Check with your local
wood stove shop and/or furnace people.
Stan
|
166.258 | Chimney question | NYTP22::NAEGELY | TPU 88 IM 91 | Tue Nov 17 1992 09:10 | 14 |
| I looked thru the notes but didn't see and notes that answer this question
although the answer to this might be obvious, please excuse my ignorance,
first time home owner...
Do I need to have my chimney cleaned if its only being used for exhaust
of my gas water heater & gas FHA system?
Thanks..
John
PS. The house is about 30 years old and to the best of my knowledge never
has the chimney been cleaned!
|
166.259 | Nah... | MANTHN::EDD | $49,000, I think it'll work out... | Tue Nov 17 1992 09:34 | 4 |
| My chimney (furnace and HW exhaust only, 30+ years) showed no sign
of any build-up when I knocked it over.
Edd
|
166.260 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Nov 17 1992 10:13 | 7 |
| RE: .0
I would clean it once.....unless you know *WHAT* the previous owner
burned. Gas, in itself, shouldn't leave behind any "crud", but
you should check/clean the chimney if you don't know it's history.
Marc H.
|
166.261 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Tue Nov 17 1992 11:49 | 3 |
| I wouldn't bother. If it makes you feel better, pull the pipe out
of the chimney and look in to see if there's any buildup. If it's
been used only for gas, there won't be.
|
166.22 | | TNPUBS::MACKONIS | We are a compromise of nature! | Tue Nov 17 1992 13:06 | 14 |
| I hope this is a good note to post this request in -- have been rumaging
through the chimney notes and could not find any references to masons.
I am trying to find some recommendations for masons to rebuild a chimney. The
chimney is in an 1812 house and needs to be rebuilt from the firebox up. I
had once mason come out and give me an estimate, but I was not enthusiastic
about either the mason or his price.
Any referrals would be appreciated, either in reply to this note or via mail.
I live in Brookline, NH.
Thanks.........
dana
|
166.262 | Peer Down the Chute! | MR4DEC::PWILSON | PHILIP WILSON, DTN 297-2789, MRO4-2E/C18 | Wed Nov 18 1992 17:22 | 8 |
| Best bet may be to inspect from both the top and at the bottom trap
door for removing ashes. The main thing to look for are bricks that
have fallen to bottom, and dead animals (squirrels) that may have
slipped down the chute. In fact, I've been advised that it is good
practice to but a cap on the chimney (such as chicken wire).
Last week I had 3 English Sparrows fly down my woodstove chimney! This
is the second of 3 bird squadrons.
|
166.263 | Use a mirror... | ROULET::CASSIDY | Aspiring conservationist | Mon Nov 23 1992 05:46 | 7 |
| Your chimney should have a clean out door at the base. On a
bright day, place a hand held mirror inside the chimney and aim it
so you can see along the chimney walls. You will probably be able
to see the seams between the ceramic liner sections and the walls
will look pretty much smooth. If not, call a chimney sweep.
Tim
|
166.264 | Is leak from Chimney or flashing? | ERLANG::CHIU | Dah Ming Chiu | Thu Jan 14 1993 17:11 | 39 |
| I could not find a discussion under 1111.chimney, so here is the question:
There is a central chimney for the fireplace in my cathedral-ceiling
family room. When it rains hard, the ceiling area abutting the chimney
as well as the chimney bricks near the ceiling get wet. I had noticed
some stain when I bought the house. I got two suggestions of how to fix
the problem:
1) One roofer diagnosed the problem as follows: the chimney is big
(approx 2'x5'?) and there is a single flue. The rest of the area
on top of the chimney is sealed by concrete. The theory is that
the concrete had been poured during colder weather and subsequently
developed cracks. The suggested solution was to apply some
water-proof stuff to seal the top of the chimney.
2) The inspector and another roofer (both are highly recommended in this
notes conference) diagnosed the problem differently. They told me
that the problem is with the flashing around the chimney.
The inspector said that there was no counter-flashing, whereas the
roofer said the counter-flashing was already there, but the problem
was with the flashing not laid down properly. When asked about the
condition of the concrete on top of the chimney, the roofer said
that he could not see any cracks. The suggested solution was to
fix the flashing.
At the time, I trusted (2). Part of the reason was that (1) was quoted
at $300 whereas (2) quoted at $120. From my point of view, I could see
no reason for them to differ by that much - so I concluded that (1)
was probably over-charging.
Several months after the repair, during the rain storm of December 92,
the leak occurred again and was even worse than before. My questions are:
a) What is the responsibility of the roofer who did the repair?
I have called him several times and he promised to take a look at
it and has not gotten back to me. What can I expect from him?
b) Should I try (1) now. Have others had this kind of problem and
tried doing (1) to fix it?
|
166.265 | Cheap bricks. | XK120::SHURSKY | If you're not lead dog, the view never changes. | Fri Jan 15 1993 13:49 | 8 |
| If you have cheap bricks (and you can bet the contractor probably didn't use
the highest quality) then they may be porous. They have to be sealed to stop
them passing the moisture. The more rain, the more wetness you should see.
You can get a masonary sealant and (if you have aren't prone to acrophobia)
do-it-yourself for about $20.
Stan
|
166.266 | acrylic sealer ain't cheap | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Fri Jan 15 1993 16:45 | 38 |
|
I'm working on a similar problem with my "new" house.
So far I've had two masons look at it, and I'm looking for a third
opinion (and good weather) before I commit to an attempted fix.
RE: .1
Sealing the bricks was suggested by the first mason.
BUT properly sealing a good sized chimney will cost more than a mere
$20 for a can of masonary sealer!
See the other notes in this file about the relative merits of some of
the "cheap" silicone-based masonary sealers. They will not last more
than 5 years and will have to be redone. A good permanent masonary
sealer will cost a bit more per gallon and depending on the amount of
chimney to sealed may easily run more than a $100 in material cost
alone.
--------
In my case, the first mason would seal the bricks, and redo the chimney
cap (to seal any cracks and add some slope to the mortar)
The second mason wasn't so sure that mere sealing was the best solution
and also wanted to check and repair all of the roof flashing (pull up
the shingles, etc.) to his statisfaction before he would garantee the
repair. He also suggested a chimney cap, and spent some time looking
for possible flue problems. (the mortar on my chimney is poorly
raked, with many voids... water can get between the brick and flue and
cause problems)
With the recent heavy snow and rain storms causing more leakage than
ever, I'm inclined to have the mason try "everything" when I pay them
to come out. Hopefully then, I can get them to come back if they fail.
The only reason I won't try to DIY is the lack of proper laddering and
scaffolding to work on the roof.
Dave.
|
166.267 | any wet inside the chimney? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Jan 15 1993 17:20 | 49 |
|
Even if the brick is very porous, the flashing should extend between the
courses far enough to stop any water coming down the interior face of
the brick. The flashing also serves as the damp course for the chimney.
What's possible is that the chimney has moved in relation to the wood
frame and created a gap somewhere between the two. Normally, the
interface between brick & wood allows for a gap and a bit of movement.
A two-part flashing compensates for the movement. Could be that the
builder used prefabricated one-piece flashing (no counterflashing)
and it's no longer forming a complete seal.
Problems like this can be hard to diagnose and fix, but I'd go along
with 2. The fact that the brick is visibly wet below the ceiling
seems to point to the flashing. A problem with the concrete cap would
allow water to enter the *inside* of the stack and you should be able
to find evidence of it at the bottom - if you can get to see between the
fireplace and the stack.
[Go into the basement, underneath the fireplace and remove the
insulation below the fireplace. You may see some indication that water
is penetrating - damp patches or dried stains possibly with a brown
residue. If this is the case, then the cap is suspect and water is
coming down the inside.]
Another possibility is that the flashing is OK, but the severe rain
is getting in at the edge of the roof because some shingles are lifting
in the wind.
$300 seems reasonable putting on some quality sealer, whereas $130
seems too cheap for doing a thorough job on a flashing. I suspect he
simply went up there and squirted some roofing cement around. Wave
goodbye to that cash unless you want to take him to the small claims
court.
If it is an incorrectly laid flashing the job is pretty substantial and
may involve removing some roofing shingles and possibly even cutting
the existing flashing out of the brick and pointing in a new flashing.
I'd expect it to be several hundred $ worth. You should also be sure
that you tell the roofer that you want the *leak* repaired - not the
flashing *or* the cap. That way, you have some recourse.
Any chance you can talk to the original builder about the construction
method?
regards,
Colin
|
166.268 | Similar problem solved | BREAK::STANTON | Gerry Stanton @SHR | Fri Jan 15 1993 19:25 | 26 |
| I had a similar problem with a chimney that went through the roof. It
had both step flashing and counter flashing. The cap, pointing, bricks
and flashing appeared to be in good condition. However driving rain
sometimes resulted in wet bricks on the inside and occasional dripping.
Some sources recomended sealer. Some sources recomended against
sealer. I contacted sealer manufactures and they would not state that
their sealer would do no short or long term harm. Therefore I chose
not to seal.
One of the masons suggested that temporarily wrapping the chimney with
plastic to, but not over, the flashing would define whether the
moisture was seeping in through the masonry or around the flashing.
With the plastic on the interior remained dry suggesting that the
moisture path was through the masonry.
My solution was to have the masonry torn down to the point where the
chimney passes through the roof. A single sheet of lead flashing
covering the masonry plus one foot around the perimeter was installed.
The lead was turned up inside the flues to catch rain on the flue walls.
Weep holes were provided just above the flashing to drain any moisture
in the masonry. The chimney was then rebuilt approximately as original
height with new "used" brick.
Hope you find something useful in this account.
|
166.269 | | ERLANG::CHIU | Dah Ming Chiu | Mon Jan 18 1993 12:21 | 77 |
| Thanks for the replies. Some more questions:
RE: .2
I notice you got "masons" to look at the problem. What is the difference
between masons and roofers? (in terms of applying their stills to
solve this kind of problem) Where do you look for them? Can you send
me some recommendations?
RE: .3
> A two-part flashing compensates for the movement. Could be that the
> builder used prefabricated one-piece flashing (no counterflashing)
> and it's no longer forming a complete seal.
I went up with one of the roofers and saw the there was some
counterflashing which is flashing that start from chimney and hangs down
towards the roof, right? (The reason that I am not sure is that the
inspector had told me that there was no counterflashing!)
> Problems like this can be hard to diagnose and fix, but I'd go along
> with 2. The fact that the brick is visibly wet below the ceiling
> seems to point to the flashing. A problem with the concrete cap would
> allow water to enter the *inside* of the stack and you should be able
> to find evidence of it at the bottom - if you can get to see between the
> fireplace and the stack.
> [Go into the basement, underneath the fireplace and remove the
> insulation below the fireplace. You may see some indication that water
> is penetrating - damp patches or dried stains possibly with a brown
> residue. If this is the case, then the cap is suspect and water is
> coming down the inside.]
I am not sure what you are suggesting me to look. In the garage, which is
below the room with the fireplace, there is a small door for collecting
fireplace ashes. Anyway, I will take a look and see if there is signs
of wetness in the fireplace or underneath it.
> $300 seems reasonable putting on some quality sealer, whereas $130
> seems too cheap for doing a thorough job on a flashing. I suspect he
> simply went up there and squirted some roofing cement around. Wave
> goodbye to that cash unless you want to take him to the small claims
> court.
> If it is an incorrectly laid flashing the job is pretty substantial and
> may involve removing some roofing shingles and possibly even cutting
> the existing flashing out of the brick and pointing in a new flashing.
> I'd expect it to be several hundred $ worth.
The roofer explained to me that the problem was incorrectly laid flashing,
and he was going to take it apart and put it back properly. He charged
by hours ($25/hour) and estimated 4-5 hours of work.
I do not understand what is involved to apply the sealer. From what I
naively imagine, it is similar to painting? If the sealing material costs
$100, as Dave suggested, is it reasonable to pay $200 for labor?
> Any chance you can talk to the original builder about the construction
> method?
I tried to find the original builder (for something else) and was told
that he has gone out of business and cannot be found. My house was built
about 5 years ago during those crazy years. I bought it second-hand.
RE: .4
> One of the masons suggested that temporarily wrapping the chimney with
> plastic to, but not over, the flashing would define whether the
> moisture was seeping in through the masonry or around the flashing.
> With the plastic on the interior remained dry suggesting that the
> moisture path was through the masonry.
Good suggestion, except how do you know when the rain is coming. For
small rains, I cannot visually observe any leak. Also, how long can
the wrap stay up there? How ugly does it look?
> My solution was to have the masonry torn down to the point where the
> chimney passes through the roof. A single sheet of lead flashing
> covering the masonry plus one foot around the perimeter was installed.
> The lead was turned up inside the flues to catch rain on the flue walls.
> Weep holes were provided just above the flashing to drain any moisture
> in the masonry. The chimney was then rebuilt approximately as original
> height with new "used" brick.
How much did this rebuilt chimney cost you? Sounds like a BIG job.
Can you elaborate a bit on which sealer manufacturere you talked to and
what did you found out. I am not a perfectionist, and would be willing
to live with a solution that protects the house for a sufficiently long
time. Thanks.
|
166.270 | sounds less like the cap... | SMURF::WALTERS | | Mon Jan 18 1993 13:27 | 20 |
|
Yes - the flashing that comes down from the stack is the
counterflashing. Note .5 describes exactly how it should be correctly
installed to prevent water finding its way down the stack below the
roof level.
I was suggesting that you check inside the base of the chimney to see
if you can find any evidence of water coming down the inside, to
eliminate the possibility of water getting in through the cap. You
probably won't see anything in the ashbox, more likely between the
brick exterior and the firebox (if you can see in there). Anyhow, I'm
less inclined to think that you'll find anything. The suggestions in
notes .3 and .5 are probably the way to go.
Sounds like you need to consult a mason.
Regards,
Colin
|
166.271 | | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Mon Jan 18 1993 17:56 | 35 |
| RE: .5
- Most of the work is masonary involved. Masons can do simple roofing,
but I don't trust roofers to do masonary work.
- Sealing the brick would be "merely" painting it with a sealer.
The sealer may run about $10-$20 /gallon. It would depend on the
amount of chimney to be covered how much this is going to cost in
material and labor. In my case I have two chimneys: one on the side
of the house, and one that goes through a roof. I was quoted $500
to seal both at one time.
- I may of confused two issues around the top of the chimney.
Both masons have been concerned with the "finish" of the top of the
bricks around the flue. The mortar should not be cracked, and should
have a slope, so that rain and snow doesn't just sit on the top.
Additionally, one said I should consider a chimney cap, a metal thing
that blocks the rain from directly falling down the flue. This is
more obvious if you do observe wetness in hearth or ashbox (as
previously noted).
Crude diagram follows:
=========== Chimney cap
| |<- expanded metal screen (also keeps out
| | birds and squirrels)
/----------\
/---- | | ----\ mortar should gently slope away
/ | | \ from flue pipe to edge of
+------------------------+ bricks
| | | | | | |
FWIW:
Dave.
|
166.272 | response | BREAK::STANTON | Gerry Stanton @SHR | Fri Jan 22 1993 00:51 | 37 |
| Re .5 Questions
how do you know when the rain is coming?
I didn't. I wrapped the chimney for a year.
how long can the wrap stay up there?
At least a year.
How ugly does it look?
At first more different than ugly. As the plastic weathered, turned
white and was shreaded by the wind it became less attractive. But I
was fortunate that the chimney is not very visible.
How much did this rebuilt chimney cost you?
$1500
Tear down old chimney, Construct new chimney 6hx6wx2.5d, cap, lead,
clean up, provide and install new flue top damper for one flue, remove
old damper.
which sealer manufacturer?
Two, Thorough seal and another (cant recall name) both had products
intended for exterion application on masonry/brickwork. Both supported
the application. Neither would comit that, properly applied, their
product would do no harm.
Comment:
Counterflashing does not extend very deep into the masonry therefore
seepage through a large cross section of masonry is possible if the
cap, bricks or mortar permit the passage of water. Pan flashing or bell
flashing is essential, IMHO, for through the roof chimneys.
Falshing/counterflashing is, IMHO, best used where pan flashing or bell
flashing is not possible.
Hope you find an effective and economical solution.
|
166.273 | 5 months later... | ERLANG::CHIU | Dah Ming Chiu | Wed Jun 30 1993 12:55 | 58 |
| Some followup to the original discussion.
As suggested, I got three masons to look at the problem. Of course,
they offered different opinions:
Mason #1: a young guy, after looking at the problem, said "you need
a roofer to fix the flashings
Mason #2: wearing clothes with company label and claiming to be the
designated mason for "This Old House", recommended
a) remove the current half-rusted cap and put in a big
stainless steel cap that is slightly bigger than the
cross-section of the chimney (like an umbrella): ~$500
b) apply sealant to external portion of chimney: ~$250
c) tighten up the flashing around the chimney: no additional charge
stops short of giving a guarantee, but says the only other
possibility for leaking again would be for water to travel
down along some beams behind the ceiling.
Mason #3: an old-timer living in the neighborhood, will
a) seal the external portion of chimney
b) repair the mortar cap on top of the chimney which has
chipped a little bit around the edges
c) tightening up the flashing
d) help me clean the brick chimney inside the house (remove
the white stuff with Muriac (sp) acid)
all for ~$650. Will not give a guarantee. When asked why
not put up a S.S. cap, he said it will make starting
the fireplace hard; he recommends just using a S.S. mesh
at the flue openning to stop racoons getting into the chimney.
After talking with these masons and having gone up to the roof myself
three times, I learned the following:
1) there are some noticeable gaps between the chimney and roof;
so I think get the flashing tight is important;
2) the bricks for my chimney the new "used" bricks, so they are not
the extra porous old bricks;
3) there is no crack on the mortar cap, although the edge is a bit
chipped
4) the current metal cap is half rusted, hence need replaced or
removed sometime soon to prevent rust wash down the chimney to
the roof.
My personal judgement is that the leak comes from a combination of
the loose flashing and the mason, probably more from the former
factor. I am almost ready to go with Mason #2 at this point. The
only reservations are:
- should I worry about not being able to start the fireplace?
- am I going to find someone who would give a guarantee if I shop
around more?
I like to hear some comments on these.
For others who have had similar problem, a useful advise I got from
one of the masons is to get the insurance company to look at the
damage. In my case, they refunded me the cost of painting the whole
ceiling and cleaning the bricks, which is actually higher than the
$500 deduction.
|
166.23 | Stainless Steel vs Poured Chimney Liners | DNEAST::BOLDUC_JANE | | Tue Aug 03 1993 11:43 | 17 |
|
I need to line two old brick chimneys. One is used with a wood stove
and the other with an oil/wood furnace. Both are old.
The choice is should a stainless steel liner be used or should a liner
be poured (such as Superflue)? What are the pros and cons of stainless
verses poured? Anyone have experience with this?
One of my greatest concerns is long-term quality and long-term easy
maintanence. I have heard that stainless steel looses its favorable
stainless properties if exposed to high temperatures. Alternately, I
have heard that the poured liners can crumble and begin to break down.
I am getting quotes from three businesses.
All responses appreciated.
|
166.24 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Aug 03 1993 11:58 | 4 |
| Have you considered relining with flue tiles? I did to my 160 year old
house. Worked fine.
Marc H.
|
166.25 | up in smoke again | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Aug 05 1993 08:50 | 11 |
|
Marc. How did you seal the tiles together or get the
aligment correct?? Like, let them down with a rope and
hope for the best????
re: I would think the steel would be a good DIY project....
The cement lined would seal everything up good and might
last longer? But I would be guessing on the price. Wasnt
there something in the file somewhere about the cost??
JD
|
166.26 | Open Up A Wall | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Aug 05 1993 09:08 | 12 |
| RE: .25
JD
Well, in my case, one side of the chimney was removed about 5 feet.
This was done in the attic and second floor (two story house).
With a side removed, the tiles could easily be aligned and cemented
together by reaching into the chimney.
Messy and lots of work....but...I like fireplaces!
Marc H.
|
166.27 | ! | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Aug 05 1993 11:27 | 3 |
| Ah! The old slide it in the side trick! A!!
Sounds good..
|
166.28 | | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Thu Aug 05 1993 12:45 | 14 |
|
The S.S. will surely be less expensive. However, according to the
contractor who relined one of my flues with "THERMOCRETE"(tm),
a creosote fire with a good draft going up will get hot enough
to melt the S.S. Please, no debates.
The thermocrete is poured in place, one piece, smooth, gives
an excellent draft and provides protection up to 6000 degrees F.
For 34 feet of it, it cost me in the neighborhood of 3K. It is
easy to clean too.
Fred
|
166.90 | Reply 5 years later ... | TOOK::CIARFELLA | A baby-busted member of Gen X | Tue Aug 31 1993 16:52 | 11 |
|
I just had my chimney capped (two 12x12 flues): total was $180..
The chimney guy also fixed some bent/leaky flashing and repaired
some spots that the mortar had broken away (no charge).
I thought the price was reasonable.
Paul C
|
166.91 | SS caps | TOOK::CIARFELLA | A baby-busted member of Gen X | Tue Aug 31 1993 16:53 | 2 |
| oops ... I forgot to mention that the caps are stainless steel.
|
166.92 | Who cap'd your chimney | HYLNDR::MCFARLAND | | Wed Sep 01 1993 11:09 | 9 |
| Can you tell me where you are located and who you had do this work?
I need some chimney work done, fixing some loose morter and have been
having a hard time finding someone who is willing to do such a small
job.
Judie
|
166.93 | CHI did my capping | TOOK::CIARFELLA | A baby-busted member of Gen X | Wed Sep 01 1993 12:25 | 8 |
|
I used CHI @ 1-800-367-6743.
I believe they are in Nashua. I don't know how far they travel.
Paul C
|
166.94 | Quality work | JURAN::HAWKE | | Thu Sep 02 1993 13:49 | 10 |
| I have a friend Karl Janhunan that recently rebuilt my chimney
from the roof up. Before this he rebuilt my in-laws chimney
from the ground up. My in-laws chimney has two flues and is
over two stories high. Both came out very nice ! and were
completed in short order. For big jobs Karl has his brother,
and father (also masons) help him. He lives in Gardner but I know
he has traveled as far as Seabrook NH (don't know if he'll do that
all the time though) His phone number is 508-632-4939.
Dean
|
166.274 | Question about waterproofing chimney | SISDB::GERACE | Cindy Gerace @297-3884 | Tue Sep 14 1993 11:05 | 13 |
|
Is it worth it to waterproof a chimney? I am having some repair work
done on my chimney & the company is recommending I also have them
waterproof the outside to keep further erosion from happening to the
bricks. They said the stuff they use allows the chimney to "breathe",
but will keep water from damaging the bricks. It costs $1/square foot
- estimtated around $100 for the entire chimney & is guaranteed for ten
years. I have never heard of this, but if it makes sense, I'd like to
get it done.
Thanks for any info,
- Cindy
|
166.275 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Sep 14 1993 11:40 | 6 |
| Yes, I've also had this recommended to me, though $1/sf is awfully
expensive! You can do it yourself with a masonry sealer such as Thompson's
Water Seal. However, if you're not comfortable on a ladder, it may pay
to have the repair firm do it for you.
Steve
|
166.276 | SHould this be done to new chimneys? | ICS::SOBECKY | Genuinely. Sincerely. I mean it. | Wed Sep 15 1993 14:03 | 8 |
|
Hmmm...I just finished having a house built and wonder if it
would be good 'preventative maintenance' to seal the chimney.
Any opinions?
John
|
166.277 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Sep 15 1993 14:46 | 3 |
| I think it would be a good idea.
Steve
|
166.278 | Sounds reasonable | SISDB::GERACE | Cindy Gerace @297-3884 | Wed Sep 15 1993 22:40 | 5 |
| Thanks for the responses - I think I will have it done while they are
doing the work. I have enough painting to do already - I'll leave this
job for the professionals!
- Cindy
|
166.95 | Leaking slab on top of chimney. | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Wed Sep 29 1993 14:45 | 29 |
|
Not REALLY a chimney cap problem... more a a chimney TOP pronlem. ;-}
I have a contemporary house with a wood framed chimney that encloses
the actual metal pipes. The very top of the chimney is a slightly
domed slab of what looks like mortar... through which the metal pipes
pass.
__
___ /--\
/---\ | |
| | | |
________________
Mortar -> /________________\
Wood Frame---> | |
| ------------------
| | |
| | |
v | |
The mortar layer seems to be crumbling and allowing water to run down
the inside of the wood framed chimney, where it eventually leaks out
where it is attached to the foundation (inside and out).
I would like to replace most if not all of the "mortar slab" myself
and I was wondering what material I might use. Is there any problem
with using some patching concrete like Thorocrete? Is there a reason
that it seems to have been done with some crumbly form of mortar?
- Mac
|
166.29 | Poured vs Stainless Steal liner? | ISLNDS::BRENNAN_P | | Fri Dec 31 1993 00:05 | 11 |
| Hi All,
Now I've had the chimney fire and cracked all my tiles. I need to
decide between Ahrens poured and HomeSaver SS linings. Anyone with
experience with either specificly or with benifits of poured versus SS
liners.
Need to make the decision soon the house is cold and Mass Electric is
making a bundle.
Paul
|
166.30 | Smoking Stove | EMASS::PANTANO | | Fri Apr 01 1994 21:44 | 8 |
| Speaking of Consolidated Dutchwest; does anyone out there own one of
their stoves? I have the Adirondack model and have been unable to use
it with the doors open since I bought it.
I've talked to their "engineers" but they could not tell me why the
stove smoked with the doors open. I suspect the 6" flute has something
to do with it.
Steve P.
|
166.31 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sat Apr 02 1994 07:02 | 3 |
| Ask in PORI::STOVES.
Steve
|
166.228 | Double flue liner for single flue? | TPSYS::WEST | | Mon Jun 13 1994 14:04 | 33 |
|
New question on chimney liners
I have a single flue chimney, with tile insert about 8" square.
Currently I have an oil furnace tied into it.
I would like to put a wood stove in the basement also, and would
like to use the chimney (instead of exterior SS triple wall pipe).
Q. Are there any liners that are double flue to fit into an exisiting
single flue?
I imagine something like this:
---------
|\ |
| \ |
| \ |
| \ | tie in furnace here
| \ |
| \ |
|______\|
tie in
stove here
Anybody seen anything like this, or something to fit the bill?
Thanks
Bob
|
166.229 | | MRED::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Mon Jun 13 1994 14:27 | 5 |
| *IF* the remaining cross-sectional area was still adequate for the
oil burner, you could run a single-wall stainless steel flue for
the stove up inside the existing flue, but that's a big IF. I
doubt the numbers would work out.
|
166.230 | Very helpful over this particular winter ;-) | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Mon Jun 13 1994 15:06 | 7 |
| Depending on where you live (Massachusetts allows this for example), you can
tie a woodburning stove into the same flue as an existing oil furnace.
It has to enter the flue x number of inches below the oil burner entrance
and I think the flue has to be big enough to support both. We did it this
past winter and were very satisfied.
PeterT
|
166.231 | Re: .5 | TPSYS::WEST | | Mon Jun 13 1994 16:20 | 3 |
|
Any issues around increased risk of chimney fires with both heat sources?
|
166.232 | It's safe, but it's work... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Tue Jun 14 1994 01:33 | 10 |
| > Any issues around increased risk of chimney fires with both heat sources?
If you burn (wood) properly and clean the chimney every year,
there is very little to worry about. Chimney fires start because
creosote builds up from a wood stove that consistently burns too
cold. Then one day the stove is run too hot; hot enough to ignite
the creosote.
Questions about wood stoves could be directed to PORI::STOVES.
Tim
|
166.233 | Oil and wood mix fine in Mass. if done correctly! | RCFLYR::CAVANAGH | Jim Cavanagh SHR1-4/H8 237-2252 | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:21 | 18 |
|
I also installed a wood stove using my oil burner flue this past winter.
The wood stove must tap into the flue at least 6 inches BELOW where the oil
burner taps into the flue. And it MUST be an OIL burner...gas is out of the
question!
One thing I did notice is that the wood stove would sort of flare up when
the oil burner kicked on due to the increased draft. Not a big problem unless
you've already got the stove cookin' at high a temp. and the oil burner stays
on for a while.
BTW - I'm in Northboro Mass.
And have any installation properly inspected by the town!
Jim
|
166.96 | I suppose I should be thankful it's not bricks above the tile | VMSSPT::LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Wed Jul 20 1994 10:54 | 34 |
| I'm not sure if this would fit better here or in 3512, which seems to
be discussing caps which cover multiple flues, but...
I've a chimney with two flues, using 8" x 13" and 8" x 8" flue tiles.
The occasional smokey odor from the fireplace during wet periods was
annoying, but recent incursions by the local fauna made screening or
capping the chimney imperative. So I went out and bought two chimney
caps, of the appropriate dimensions. Paid the premium for stainless
steel because the flues are close enough that the abutting overhangs
would probably have to be bent so they'd fit, which might easily crack
an enameled finish (not to mention that the cheaper black ones weren't
available in one of the sizes I needed).
The way these caps work is that you position them on the top of the
flue tile, and in the part that hangs over are 4 screws which you
tighten against the side of the tile. Quick and easy, done in 15
minutes, nothing to it...
My chimney has nothing for them to hang over, or to engage the screws.
The tiles extend something like 2" or so above the topmost course of
bricks; the mason put a nice coat of mortar on them, sloping down from
the very edge of the flue tiles. So there's nothing to engage the
screws of the commonly available (over the counter) chimney cap -- at
least at a big local purveyor.
So now I'm wondering what to do (besides returning the unsuitable
goods). Would anyone have seen any kind of cap which would be designed
to slip into a flue? Would the best thing to do be to have a cap
custom-made to fit the entire chimney? I suppose I could cut hardware
cloth to go over the top and down several inches, and hold it in place
with a wire running in the mortar joint, but that strikes me as asking
for trouble when the snows come.
Dick
|
166.97 | | SOLVIT::THOMS | Ross 285-3151 | Wed Jul 20 1994 11:19 | 4 |
| Corriveau-Routhier INc in Nashua sells a hardware kit the goes inside
the flue tile.
Ross
|
166.98 | | STAR::APGAR | | Wed Jul 20 1994 13:16 | 4 |
|
I bought a stainless chimney cap at Home Depot in Nashua which fit
inside the flue pipe. It wasn't quite as easy to install, but still
went on fairly quickly.
|
166.99 | mod fix | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Jul 21 1994 07:19 | 5 |
| you could always make an angleiron bracket that fit into
the flue and bolted to the inside of the cap if you
couldnt find one......
|
166.100 | A good word for a local chain | VMSSPT::LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Wed Jul 27 1994 15:17 | 17 |
| re my own question:
Home Depot in Nashua had (as recently as 25 July) the kind which
require something like 1.5" of exposed flue tile to bolt onto.
But Somerville Lumber in Acton had the kind described by .32 (I think
it was), with sturdy metal elements that push against the inside of the
flue. Had to work at getting it in, because it was meant to be used
with tiles up to 9" x 9" O.D., but it didn't require anything more
complicated than some squeezing and bending, and pounding with the palm
of my hand.
The overhang of the top covering is easily 1.5", and that's about the
separation between the outsides of the two flues, so I hope none of the
local fauna tries getting into the fireplace's flue...
Dick
|
166.250 | more questions... | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Mon Sep 26 1994 14:27 | 57 |
| Well, this seems to be the most likely place to ressurect this
conversation..
[ And no, I am *not* willing to install an air shredder! ]
I have a fireplace that I am not using. I currently have a piece of
plywood propped against the opening, held in place with some big
boxes, but I'm planning on moving the boxes, and want to close off the
fireplace with something a little more secure (and not as ugly
looking).
I want to use something that will be weather tight - I don't want too
much heat drifting away this winter, and I've been noticing the smell
of wet ashes lately. Given the weather we've had lately, its probably
nothing more than downdraft and moisture, but I still don't like it
much.
So... here's my task - I want something that I can secure to the front
of the fireplace opening. I am considering something simple and
fairly cheap like plywood with some sort of wood trim to make it look
nice. I already know how I can secure this cover to the wall, so that
part is not a problem.
My biggest challenge, I think, is what to use for insulating material.
The cover (plywood, or whatever) will be larger than the fireplace
opening, of course. I want something that I can put between the cover
and the brick face of the fireplace to act as an air block.
I also want to make a "plug" for the fireplace opening - it will be
the same size as the fireplace opening, several (maybe 6" or more)
inches thick, and will be attached to the inside of the fireplace
cover. This, I believe, will do the following:
o cover the fireplace opening in an atractive manner - keeping the
kids out of the fireplace without using random plywood and big
boxes.
o create an air block sufficient to keep random fireplace odors out of
the house.
o insulate the fireplace opening itself to help cut down on heat loss
for the winter.
So... here are my questions..
- Any suggestions for what material to use for the fireplace cover?
- Any suggestions for what to use as an air block material, between
the fireplace cover and the brick fireplace facing?
- Any suggestions for what material to use as an insulating plug, to
fit snugly into the fireplace opening, and to be attached to the
inside of the fireplace cover?
Thanks,
- Tom
|
166.251 | A couple ideas | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Sep 27 1994 10:24 | 12 |
| If you're going to use plyood to cover the hole, you could probably
cut one (or more) solid pieces of styrofoam and attach it to the inside
of the plywood.
You may also want to consider using a silicone caulking to make a
more air-tight seal between the cover and the brick on the fireplace.
One other thought. If you get the styrofoam, you may be able to cut
a piece to fit at the top of the chimney (under your cap). This would
help keep some of the cold air/moisture out in the first place.
Ray
|
166.252 | | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:09 | 25 |
| re: .17 - Ray,
Thanks for the ideas... I have some more questions...
- I was thinking a plywood cover because its solid, fairly
inexpensive, and easy to work with. Any other suggestions as to a
material that would work as well?
- Solid styrofoam sounds good - Is it possible to glue solid styrofoam
to plywood (or anything else), or should I start thinking about some
other was to keep it in place - maybe some sort of harness or strap?
- Silicone caulking sounds like just the thing, but how hard is it to
clean off of bricks? While I want this cover to be solid, I'm not
ready to permanently plug up the fireplace. Is it possible to get
some sort of (silicone?) "gasket" that can be cut large enough to
fit around the opening of a fireplace?
- Plugging the top of the chimney sounds like it would help... would I
have to worry about moisture buildup inside the chimney if/when I
plug up both ends?
Thanks,
- Tom
|
166.253 | | WLDBIL::KILGORE | How about those DCU 3Gs!! | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:36 | 28 |
|
I would use:
o Plywood sufficient to cover the opening
o styrofoam to fit into opening
o foam carpet padding
o onstruction adhesive
Trim the styrofoam so that when it is lined on all sides with the
foam padding, it will fit snuggly into the opening. Attach foam padding
and plywood with construction adhesive; wrap foam padding slightly
around back of styrofoam to facilitate force-fit. Then, you should be
able to just shove it.
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX <- brick
|XXXXXXX
|====. <- foam
|****
|**** <- styrofoam
plywood ->|****
|****
|===='
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
|
166.254 | liquid nails good for EPS | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:44 | 17 |
|
-> Solid styrofoam sounds good - Is it possible to glue solid styrofoam
> to plywood (or anything else), or should I start thinking about some
> other was to keep it in place - maybe some sort of harness or strap?
Yes - liquid nails works well for this and does not attack the
styrofoam. Used it to glue EPS foam blocks to the back of my attic
trapdoor. How about if you cut the styrofoam slightly oversize so it
will "press fit" into the opening, holding the board in place and
sealing the airgaps?
As an alternative, maybe you could tack vinyl weatherstripping to the
rear of the plywood as a gasket - I saw this stuff on sale in HD, used
for garage door weather seals.
|
166.255 | not exactly DIY, but... | TLE::WENDYL::BLATT | | Tue Sep 27 1994 12:44 | 7 |
| I remember seeing in the list of products offerred for energy conservation
by MassSave, a product for stuffing up by the flue to avoid heat loss. I think
it was called a chimney pillow. I don't recall if it said what it was
made of or how much it cost.
I also recall that it had some feature to ensure that it got removed prior
to lighting a fire.
|
166.256 | Either/or | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Sep 27 1994 15:34 | 6 |
| I've used the 100% silicone on brick before and was able to peel
most of it off and wire brush off what was left. A clear silicone
should do the trick, or you could go with the foam adhesive backed
weather stripping too.
Ray
|
166.257 | | NOTAPC::PEACOCK | Freedom is not free! | Fri Sep 30 1994 12:10 | 5 |
| Thanks, folks. This is good input, and will give me a good place to
plan from.
- Tom
|
166.433 | fieldstone????? | WMOIS::FLECK_S | | Thu Dec 01 1994 11:59 | 14 |
|
I am looking to get alittle information about "real" fireplaces. I
would love to add a fieldstone fireplace to my living room. I know
that I need to start saving now so I can get one in a few years, maybe
less. -I have a full cellar, what needs to be done down there?
-The fireplace would be on the tallest side of the house,
how far above the peak does it have to be?
-There's a huge oak tree about 15' directly across from where
I want it, would that have to come down?
-Are there actually people who could build a fieldstone fire-
place? And do they supply the stones?
I know these questions are very simplistic but I hope somebody can
shed some light for me. Sue
|
166.434 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Fri Dec 02 1994 09:57 | 19 |
| There will need to be a foundation built for the fireplace and
chimney, right down to ground level and probably a footing below
ground.
The top of the chimney has to be 3' above the peak, I think, but
I'm not sure.
Your best bet is probably to start looking around, now, to find a
mason to build it and get their feedback on what needs to be done.
You want to go to some pains to find somebody who is truly competent
to build fireplaces. "Anybody" can build a fireplace that looks
good; it's a little harder to find somebody who can build a fireplace
that works well.
You might want to hunt up the book, "The Forgotten Art of Building
a Good Fireplace," by Vrest Orton. I think he's rather pompous
and certainly no better than he thinks he is, and the book is *not*
the final authority that he pretends it is, but it does have some
good information in it.
|
166.435 | Fieldstone mason, hard to find... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Sat Dec 03 1994 06:10 | 7 |
| A friend of mine had a house built a few years ago. He wanted
a fieldstone fireplace built but couldn't find any masons who would
build it for him. His house is in Fitchburg.
Good Luck,
Tim
|
166.436 | | USCTR1::LAJEUNESSE | | Mon Dec 05 1994 12:01 | 11 |
| If you would like the name of a good mason who just rebuilt my chimney
and put in a beautiful field stone fire place for my brother send me
mail and I'll give you his name and number. He will be able to give
you a good estimate on what you are looking at. This guy doesn't
excellent work.
Of course this is all assuming you are in Massachusetts. This guy is
located in Northboro, MA.
Mark
|
166.101 | smoke into the house | BUSY::CLEMENT | Smells like Nirvana | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:37 | 7 |
| Ever since we had a chimney cap installed we can no longer leave both
doors open to the woodstove. Smoke starts coming into the house.
I suspect the cap and was wondering if this was a common problem and
if perhaps adjusting the height of the cap may correct the problem?
thanks, Mark
|
166.437 | | NOVA::FISHER | now |a|n|a|l|o|g| | Tue Dec 06 1994 06:39 | 8 |
| DUHHH...
This guy doesn't
excellent work. ^^^
:-)
ed
|
166.102 | no problem here | BIGQ::HAWKE | | Wed Dec 07 1994 07:25 | 6 |
| haven't had a problem with mine, just capped it this year.
I don't leave the doors open though. I would guess if you
had a marginal draft to start with capping could contribute
to the problem.
Dean
|
166.103 | smoke gets in your eyes | CNTROL::JENNISON | God and sinners reconciled! | Mon Jan 02 1995 12:11 | 22 |
|
We've got a brand new house, and have had serious smoke problems
with the first two fires we tried to have. The second fire
set off the (hard-wired) smoke alarms, and we had to open 3 doors
to clear it out enough for them to shut off.
We had the builder over to discuss this, and he suggested that
a cap would help RESOLVE the smoke problem.
.36 and .37 suggest it could make it worse.
So, does anyone have suggestions ?
Does anyone know what could be causing the problem, and how we
could resolve it ? We know how to build fires; we had 2/week for
five winters in our old house without a single smoke incident.
We pre-warm the chimney with a lighted paper before starting the
fire, too.
Thanks in advance,
Karen
|
166.104 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jan 02 1995 18:31 | 5 |
| A cap can help, but it depends on what the original problem is
and what kind of cap you get. How airtight is the house? Does
cracking a window help?
Steve
|
166.105 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | God and sinners reconciled! | Tue Jan 03 1995 09:55 | 12 |
|
Cracking a window seemed to help the first time. The second
time, we still set-off the alarms.
There is a draft near the front door, but things seem relatively
tight around the windows.
Could the intake grate for the forced-hot-air system cause
the smoke to be drawn into the house ? It is in the smae
room...
Karen
|
166.106 | Tried shutting off the forced air while using the frpl? | ANGST::BECK | Paul Beck | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:28 | 15 |
| > Could the intake grate for the forced-hot-air system cause
> the smoke to be drawn into the house ? It is in the smae
> room...
I would see this as a real possibility, especially if your chimney
has a weak draft. If there is more "suction" into the room than
there is up the chimney, the smoke will follow the path of least
resistance. Your options would seem to include covering up the
intake grate while using the fireplace (not a guaranteed fix if the
forced-air system has other intakes in the house and it's running)
or improving the draft in the chimney (by using a cap -- which will
generally only improve the draft sometimes, based on outside
conditions) or reducing the diameter of the flue (if you've got a
two-story 12x12" clay fireplace flue, for example, you've got a slow
chimney).
|
166.107 | tight houses, fha, and fires | TUXEDO::MOLSON | Margaret Olson | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:59 | 33 |
| It sounds to me like the suction of the fha is sufficient
to interfere with the chimney draft. We have this problem
if the outside air intake is closed and the kitchen fan is
running (venting air out) while we are trying to start a fire.
The solution is an outside air intake for the fireplace.
It should be simple to install. You cut a hole in the floor of
the fireplace (towards the front), about the size of one brick,
and put a flip up lid thing on it (up is open,down is closed).
Then you cut a hole in the side of the base of the chimney,
and run pipe from there to the outside.
This improves the draft of the chimney, and fuels your fire
with cold outside air instead of warm inside air.
If the fireplace doesn't work, your builder should install
this.
Here's a crude picture. The part below your fireplace is hollow.
| | chimney
| |
| |
/ \
/ \
| | fireplace
| |
|--- ---- gap represents intake in floor of fireplace.
| |___________________________________________
| pipe to outside, exiting house at sill
| |---------------------------------------------
| |
|----basment floor, ash cleanout
|
166.108 | | CNTROL::JENNISON | No turning back | Thu Jan 05 1995 16:54 | 12 |
|
Well, the builder shimmied up onto the roof yesterday and
installed a cap (pleasant surprise - he'd asked us to get
buy one, and he'd install it).
We'll try a small fire tonight, along with opening the
casement window beside the fireplace while we get it
started.
Thanks for the suggestions!
Karen
|
166.44 | | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:49 | 8 |
166.469 | Leak probably from chimney somewhere | POBOXA::BAUST | | Mon Oct 14 1996 18:00 | 42 |
166.470 | PS - a little damage on the second floor | POBOXA::BAUST | | Mon Oct 14 1996 18:04 | 7 |
166.471 | Sounds high | FOUNDR::DODIER | Double Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Oct 15 1996 11:36 | 6 |
166.472 | | SHRMSG::BUSKY | | Tue Oct 15 1996 14:16 | 25 |
166.473 | wetness, flashing, re-crown | POWDML::CHU | | Thu Mar 27 1997 10:44 | 17 |
| I'm buying my first house.
The inspector Paul found that the chimney wall was wet when he got to the
attic. He said that the flashing needed to be adjusted.
After Inspector Scot went up to the roof, he reported that the chimney needed
to be re-crowned because of cracks.
The sellers agreed to get someone to take a look at. That's 2 weeks ago. Last
night he claimed that he hasn't heard from the 2 places he called.
What do you think? Can it be more than adjusting the flashing and re-crown the
chimney? I need your more educated/knowledgeable guess before I sign the P&S,
which is supposed to be today.
Thanks.
Ming
|
166.474 | P&S advice | MKOTS3::WTHOMAS | | Thu Mar 27 1997 11:19 | 19 |
| Ming:
If the inspectors were of your own choice and you have confidence in
their work, put wording in the P&S that the sale is contingent on the
owner(s) successfully completing (to your satisfaction) the actions that
you want them to complete (be specific and reference the inspectors and
the date of their report). If possible, state a date (be reasonable) and
add "time is of the essence".
Many items listed in inspection reports are give and take on whether
the buyer or sellers take on the chore (or do nothing). The chimney is
definitely something that you should get the seller to handle. It's
not a big job for them to contract out. I'm guessing on your job, but
it's probably $200-400.
Also, ask your inspector if any of the brickwork needs repointing. If
so, have them specify that in their report.
BT
|
166.475 | | NETCAD::COLELLA | | Thu Mar 27 1997 11:33 | 3 |
| What does YOUR lawyer suggest as far as protecting you in the
P&S agreement? Is there even the remote possibility that this
could cost A LOT OF MONEY to fix?
|
166.476 | Get you own mason to check! | SMURF::RIOPELLE | | Thu Mar 27 1997 11:43 | 26 |
|
Sounds like a older house. I had a 1890 Victorian, The flashing
around the chimney had to be replaced, and the caps on the chimney
had to be re-pointed. The chimneys were high enough that they took
off about a foot of the brick, and re-pointed the top.
Hopefully there's no cracks from the top of the chimney down to where
it meets the house. Then they would have to take it down to the house
level, and build it back up.
Make sure the wood around or near where the chimney meets the house
hasn't rotted from the water running down. May need to be replaced.
and don't believe everything an inspector tells you. The house I was
buying had a slate roof, the vallys were leaking. I knew both those
things. When I got the inspection report it saif th ASPHALT roof will
last approximently 5 more years. I asked the inspector what he meant,
he told me about shingles, then I asked him if he noticed when he
climed on the roof that it was SLATE.
I'd get you own brick person on the roof to look at the chimney, ask
friends for references. You may have to pay someone to look at it and
give a price. But, if you really want the house. It's a small price
to pay to know what you might be getting in to.
|
166.477 | | POWDML::CHU | | Thu Mar 27 1997 12:30 | 20 |
| Re: 166.474, .475 & .476
Thanks for the suggestions.
This problem is not mentioned on the P&S. The sellers said the house was being
sold "AS IS". I have no idea if this problem should be considered "AS IS" or
beyond. Again, since the sellers had agreed that they'd get someone, I kind of
let it go. (I know, I know, I shouldn't have truested them.)
I made several phone calls this morning and managed to find 3 chimney places
interested in taking a look at it (at my expenses, of course. 2 of them asked
for $29; the 3rd one, $50.) The broker, however, hasn't been able to reach the
sellers; so...
> ask your inspector if any of the brickwork needs repointing.
The inspector did not mention anything about brickwork verbally or in writing.
Thanks.
Ming
|
166.478 | | HYDRA::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, SPE MRO | Thu Mar 27 1997 13:19 | 10 |
| >being sold "AS IS".
Excellent! Now you can reduce the price by the estimated amount of
repairs. Write up a list of things that you feel are needed repairs
and guesstimate the repair costs.
Where is your lawyer? Just because their lawyer is drawing up the
agreement, don't let the seller call all the shots.
Mark
|
166.479 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Mar 27 1997 13:30 | 26 |
| > <<< Note 166.477 by POWDML::CHU >>>
>
>Re: 166.474, .475 & .476
>
>Thanks for the suggestions.
>
>This problem is not mentioned on the P&S. The sellers said the house was being
>sold "AS IS". I have no idea if this problem should be considered "AS IS" or
>beyond.
There is no "beyond."
"As is" is usually intended to mean "in its current condition, regardless
of seriousness, urgency, or anything else."
You could have a 4' hole in the roof that leaks to the cellar, and if
you bought the house "as is," you've bought yourself a house with
an indoor swimming pool - no recourse.
Do YOU have a lawyer? No, I don't mean are you paying your bank for THEIR
lawyer. YOU should - nay, MUST - have a lawyer to help watch out for your
interests. If you've already signed the P&S, it may be too late for a
lawyer to help. You've already agreed - in writing, via a contract -
to the terms and conditions of your sale. There will be penalties
due to the seller from you if you back out or change your mind or try to
change the deal for any reason not outlined in the P&S.
- tom]
|
166.480 | | POWDML::CHU | | Thu Mar 27 1997 15:13 | 32 |
| OK, now, I'm back from the inspection.
Chimney Inspector A:
1. flashing seal - $35
2. waterproof - $250
3. cap - $275
Chimney Inspector B:
1. flashing seal - $75
2. waterproof - $375
3. cap - $168 for one flue and $128 for the other, or over $500 for
multiple flues.
Based on the water sign, both inspectors concluded that the water problem was
caused by the flashing. (What a relief! :-) But, #2 and #3 need to get done
in the near future too.
Re: 166.479
> "As is" is usually intended to mean "in its current condition, regardless of
> seriousness, urgency, or anything else." ... you've bought yourself a house
> with an indoor swimming pool - no recourse.
Isn't "as is" wonderful? I think all sellers should add that into their
contract. :-)
I do have a lawyer ($350 for 3 hrs and $150/hr after that, btw). I haven't
signed the P&S because I didn't feel comfortable with the chimney water
problem.
Thanks.
Ming
|
166.481 | caveat emptor | MKOTS3::WTHOMAS | | Thu Mar 27 1997 16:04 | 16 |
| Good work and you're getting some good advise from the others here.
"As is" should be seen as a red flag. The owners are signaling that
you take all the risk of any existing conditions. Is there anything
else that may be lurking behind the walls or under the ground?
While a disclosure sheet "requires" the owners to state the condition of
the house as they know it, they may omit something important. There
may be nothing. But it will be up to you, your attorney, and the court to
later determine if they intentionally meant to omit an expensive
preexisting condition. "As is" can be used as a defense that any
liabilities of conditions (ie. roof/basement leaks, pests, bad water,
septic condition, radon, electrical, etc.) were accepted by you, prior to
sale.
Again, the advise of your attorney is crucial.
|
166.482 | ...it's just a detail, in the noise... | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Thu Mar 27 1997 17:25 | 44 |
|
Houses, whether new or old, are large complex devices
designed, assembled, and maintained by many people, and affected
by many things (weather, building codes, etc.) I worry whenever
I hear of someone with an issue like this, because life as a
homeowner is FULL of things like this. If you don't feel that
those sort of things are the things you want to deal with, then
you'd be better off renting, not buying.
It's just a fact about homeownership. There's no perfect
house (or perfect previous owners...) and all you as a buyer
can do is check for the big issues. In my opinion, no government
laws regarding 'full disclosure' or warranties can possibly help,
because THINGS WILL HAPPEN. Yes, sure, perhaps the previous owners
didn't tell you about that leak - perhaps they didn't know. Even
if they told you absolutely everything they do know, by reviewing
their entire lives there ('there's a car that drives by every March
13th and blows the horn...watch for bad mosquitos in April...we once
had a bat in the attic...etc....) NEW, UNEXPECTED things will happen!
And perhaps there might be things that seemed 'wrong' to you that
they took for normal (traffic, neighbors, 'wildlife', leaks...)
Oh, and everything costs more than you expected to fix. If
you fix things yourself, there still seems to be a quantum effect -
there's a minimum of $100 for anything. If you pay others, triple
that. First house for you? Have you planned for buying a mower, rakes,
shovels, mailbox...a homeowner has to deal with much an apartment renter
never thinks of, and there's not a builder or previous owner to turn to.
It's now your responsibility, and whatever fate deals out, you deal with.
You also get the fun of deciding what to do - no landlord decisions.
All you can really do is watch for the big stuff that they
might be aware of - like a future Walmart across the street, burial
ground, etc. Even though present laws often claim it's deceitful not
to 'fully disclose', the sorts of things that might matter cannot
possibly all be covered, and some are very tricky legally these days,
especially those regarding past crimes of neighbors...I can guarantee
you'll get more little stuff anyway, so problems like a little leak
now shouldn't be an issue. You can always lower your bid price, but
then again they can always reject it, too. Look at the big picture,
and see if you really like the whole house, current and future flaws
and all. You've checked out this one properly, so you know it's not
out of line - it shouldn't be a deal breaker, because you WILL have
to deal with many similiar issues in the future.
|
166.483 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Fri Mar 28 1997 08:49 | 23 |
| > <<< Note 166.480 by POWDML::CHU >>>
>
>Re: 166.479
>
>> "As is" is usually intended to mean "in its current condition, regardless of
>> seriousness, urgency, or anything else." ... you've bought yourself a house
>> with an indoor swimming pool - no recourse.
>
>Isn't "as is" wonderful? I think all sellers should add that into their
>contract. :-)
They probably don't have to, it's probably implicit in any contract
that will be presented. It's normally only the things that WON'T be given
or taken as "as is" that need to be itemized. Home buying is "the next level"
by many measures. You can't legally RENT a house without hot and cold
running water, but you can BUY one (or SELL one).
I'm glad to hear that you're more in control than the urgency of your
earlier replies seemed to indicate.
Good luck....
- tom]
|
166.484 | Been there too | JOKUR::FALKOF | | Fri Mar 28 1997 09:11 | 12 |
| and be sure to specify conditions about any unknown underground oil
tanks. maybe also require a statement about what condition the house IS
in, because 'as is' can change over the few months between P&S and
closing. Get a written statement describing as much as you can because
you don't want to argue at closing about what 'as is' means if the
house's condition changes. For example, if the second bedroom window
has a crack now, say so. If it does not now but it does just before
closing, their argument that 'as is' means just that. Insist on a
walk-through inspection a few hours before the closing.
A clause that says 'as is' can be a moving window of opportunity for
the seller. Close that window as quickly as you can.
|
166.485 | thanks | POWDML::CHU | | Fri Mar 28 1997 12:01 | 16 |
| Well, I closed my eyes (just kidding) and signed the P&S along with that big
deposit check yesterday afternoon.
Re: Note 166.484
> maybe also require a statement about what condition the house IS
> in, because 'as is' can change over the few months between P&S and
> closing.
Ooops, it's too late now. I signed the P&S yesterday. I truly hope that "as
is" won't change too much in the next 3 months.
Thank you all so much for your quick response and good advice. I knew I could
count on you!
Ming
|
166.486 | More flashing questions | 26031::ogodhcp-124-40-169.ogo.dec.com::Kalinowski | | Wed Apr 09 1997 17:58 | 19 |
| along the lines of 166.24x
I had an addition put onto our house 8 years ago. At the time, the contractor used asphalt roofing cement to
waterproof the chimney to the new roof. With periodic examinations and renewals, it has worked well.
We are not selling the house and the buyers inspector wants the
roof/chimney joint flashed.
1. Where does one get lead flashing?
2. Where does one get a bit to knock out the mortar between the bricks?
3. How deep does one cut into the mortar?
4. Does one hammer the flashing into the joint,or does one use mortar
to hold it?
5. Is this a job for a pro, or can a DIYer handle it (the roof doesn't
have too steep of a pitch?
thanks
john
|
166.487 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Thu Apr 10 1997 10:08 | 62 |
| > <<< Note 166.486 by 26031::ogodhcp-124-40-169.ogo.dec.com::Kalinowski >>>
> -< More flashing questions >-
>
>along the lines of 166.24x
>
>I had an addition put onto our house 8 years ago. At the time, the contractor
>used asphalt roofing cement to waterproof the chimney to the new roof. With
>periodic examinations and renewals, it has worked well.
>
>We are not selling the house and the buyers inspector wants the
>roof/chimney joint flashed.
Congratulations, if this is the worst problem that the inspector could point
out, you have demonstrated that you have a very sound house and a very
picky potential buyer (I'd bet that this is their first house).
Of course, the chimney should have been properly flashed when it was built,
but if it has caused no problems and isn't likely to in the near future,
I'd push back on the buyer and tell him/her that this is the kind of repair
that THEY should probably take responsibility for, since they will be living
in the house and would probably feel more confortable having a person of their
choice and who will answer to THEM if there's a problem with the repair.
You probably shouldn't have to accept a price reduction of more than
a couple of hundred dollars to have them take on the work.
Seriously, you don't want the buyers coming after YOU if there's a substantial
leak in the first really heavy storm after the work is done and they move in.
If that doesn't work (and if it's their first house, it might not),
get a pro to do it, and get a statement that YOU will be absolved
of any problems that arise. This is a situation where a "repair" can
do more harm than good.
Your questions are all easily answered, but you didn't ask any questions
about the need to remove the current asphalt or how to integrate the new
flashing into the existing roofing, which suggests that the job is more
complicated than you understand right now.
>1. Where does one get lead flashing?
Chimney and masonry supply store
>2. Where does one get a bit to knock out the mortar between the bricks?
You need a cold chisel and a small sledge hammer (3 pound?).
>3. How deep does one cut into the mortar?
About half the depth of the brick?
>4. Does one hammer the flashing into the joint,or does one use mortar
> to hold it?
Both - you clear out the mortar, fold the lead into the space, and repack
the mortar over the fold.
>5. Is this a job for a pro, or can a DIYer handle it (the roof doesn't
> have too steep of a pitch?
It's a job for the new owner, but I've covered that.....
- tom]
|
166.488 | thanks | 26031::ogodhcp-123-40-228.ogo.dec.com::Kalinowski | | Thu Apr 10 1997 12:16 | 13 |
| Thanks Tom
You got it. First time buyer, and yes all the faults are minor. No
need to rattle them to save a couple of bucks and jeopardize the
sale.
Cutting loose the old shingles should be a breeze, as I already
replaced a couple that looked worn prior to the inspection. I
have spares to redo a section if need be.
I will price a pro this week as time is getting short, but if need
be, I now think I can handle this, I just wasn't sure what the
tricks were, or where to get the materials. Now I do...
|
166.489 | looking for,,, | QUAKKS::DWORSACK | | Tue Apr 15 1997 13:18 | 13 |
| this topic just reminded me,,, as i'm looking for a place to purchase
a chimney cap. NOT the type you purchase in Home Depot for just to
cover one flue,,, but a custom size to cover the entire chimney.
i know somthing like this wont be cheap, but thats why i'm looking for
a supplier myself to keep the cost down and install it myself.
i'm looking to deflect as much water off the top, and eventually the
sides, of the chimney... i believe the masons that built it did not
use a quality mortar mix,,, and i'm trying to prevent further
damage/and or complete pointing or replacement of the chimney...
(btw my house is only about 20 years old)...
jim
|
166.490 | A couple pointers | FOUNDR::DODIER | Double Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Apr 15 1997 14:21 | 8 |
| You didn't say where you're located. If you happen to live near
Manchester, NH, you might want to give Courveu Routhier (sp?) a try.
Another thought is to look in the phone book under roofers. Many of
them do their own sheet metal work. If you can take the measurements
and draw up what you want, you could probably get someone to make it
for you.
Ray
|
166.491 | | HYLNDR::BROWN | | Tue Apr 15 1997 14:46 | 31 |
|
A couple of things come to mind.
1. A simple chimney top using plate steel and threaded rod. Local steel
fab places are best bet. A rectangle of 1/16" or 1/8" steel plate
w/ 4 holes is fab'd. Holes drilled into mortar cap and lead anchors
inserted. Thread in rod and use threaded pipe nipples (6-9"?) for
standoffs and nuts to hold the whole thing done. Sounds like you'll
need to oversize it, normally it only covers the opening of the flue
plus an inch or two and it sounds like you want to protect the whole
chimney top, mortar cap and all. This is probably the cheapest
solution -- but its not a cure. Only cure is to redo the brick
work.
2. clay tops such as http://www.bricknet.com/Superiortops.html. But
again the clay tops are mostly to deflect water from getting into
the flue -- not to protect the exterior chimney brick/stone work.
3. redo the brick work and have a colar around the top of the chimney
added. The brick colar should project out 1-2" and this will help
keep the rest of the chimney drier but dripping water out away from
the face.
But all of the above will only reduce the amount of water getting to
the face of the chimney in light rain where there is no wind. Any wind
or heavy rain and rain deflectors over the chimney just won't work very
well. Besides wind driven rain, you've get quite a bit of splashing
off of the roof surface onto the chimney face. This means that you may
be able to slow the progress of water damage -- but you won't be able
to eliminate it.
|
166.492 | Would a sealer help ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Double Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Apr 15 1997 15:59 | 5 |
| Just a thought, but would a masonary sealer help here (i.e. like
Thompsons ) ? I suspect it will just delay the inevitable, but it might
delay it enough to make it worth while.
Ray
|
166.493 | sealer ? sure, why not.. | QUAKKS::DWORSACK | | Thu Apr 17 1997 13:31 | 9 |
| >Would a sealer help
i had the same thought... if only to prevent the water from
penetrating the cement...they talk about it for driveways, so why not.
anyone have any other thoughts ??
re: others, thanks for the input.
jim
|
166.494 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Apr 17 1997 14:20 | 5 |
| Yes, applying masonry sealer to a chimney is a good idea. But it's best to
use one which allows inner moisture to escape - something like Thompson's
Water Seal won't.
Steve
|
166.495 | We were told to use Thompson's Water Seal on our chimney | HYDRA::NEWMAN | Chuck Newman, 508/467-5499 (DTN 297), MRO1-3/F26 | Thu Apr 17 1997 23:49 | 13 |
| | <<< Note 166.494 by QUARK::LIONEL "Free advice is worth every cent" >>>
|
|Yes, applying masonry sealer to a chimney is a good idea. But it's best to
|use one which allows inner moisture to escape - something like Thompson's
|Water Seal won't.
|
| Steve
Hmmm. When we got our house inspected by <I'm drawing a blank on his name, but
there are about a gazillion positive recommendations on him in this notes file>,
he specifically suggested Thompson's Water Seal for our brick chimney...
-- Chuck Newman
|
166.496 | regarding .491 option 1 | STRATA::KOOISTRA | | Sun Apr 20 1997 14:11 | 5 |
| regarding .491 option 1
threaded rod + steel plate soon rust and stains chimney + roof
making it very unattractive. Parts should be made of material not
subject to rusting.
|
166.497 | ash dump? | PASTA::PIERCE | The Truth is Out There | Tue Apr 22 1997 17:19 | 7 |
|
Do any of the Chimney company's clean the ash dump? I had this company
in Maynard, MA and they told me they clean the dump, but when I dropped
something down the dump and I went down to get it, it was plain to see
that the dump has NEVER been cleaned?
louisa
|
166.498 | Another happy customer of Complete Sweep... | 26031::ogodhcp-124-40-17.ogo.dec.com::Kalinowski | | Wed Apr 23 1997 12:15 | 7 |
| re .488
after the many recommendations for the Complete Sweep in
Dunstable, I had Mike take a look at flashing the chimney, and
in the end do the work the following week..
For $135 it wasn't worth my aggrevation. The work came out
excellant.
|