T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
63.1 | New stadium guarantees champeenship? Is this baseball fixed? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 14 1993 10:24 | 8 |
|
> Predicted to win in
> all in two years when they move into their new stadium.
By whom (besides you, Hal?)? Long way to go before that...
glenn
|
63.2 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 14 1993 10:27 | 7 |
| Good report on Charles Nagy on the news last night. He was back home
to see the recent UCONN game.
Sportscaster figures he might win 20 this year.....
'Saw
|
63.3 | | MKFSA::LONG | "just keep it between the lines" | Thu Jan 14 1993 12:10 | 8 |
| re: winning it all in two years...
Hal,
Just for future reference, and I think you'll need it, the Crow Cafe
is now note 50.
Bill
|
63.4 | WOOF! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 1-900-822-NOTY | Thu Jan 14 1993 12:20 | 1 |
|
|
63.5 | Turned it around! | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Thu Jan 14 1993 13:51 | 7 |
|
The Indians were 2nd only to the World champs in wins durring the
second half of last season. Things are looking up for the tribe!
Chief - WaHooooo!
|
63.6 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Squeelers = Loser Girly Mons | Thu Jan 14 1993 16:01 | 11 |
| HAL,
glad to see you're blind optimism extends past the Brown(spot)s(tm) and
to the other losers in Clevescum.
The Indiand win it all in two years, yeah right, and I'm Mork and
you're Mindy.
JaKe
|
63.7 | two years is all it takes | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Fri Jan 15 1993 10:06 | 6 |
|
You wish Jake!
WaHoooo!
|
63.8 | let's see where they are in '95 | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Remember Twins/Braves in '91? | Fri Jan 15 1993 17:13 | 13 |
| I think a lot of people would like to see the Indians do well. It'd be
fun to see what Cleveland Stadium would be like with 60,000 to 70,000
crazy people for baseball. After all it's been years, nay decades
since they've fielded a contending team. While they have several fine
young players who may form the nucleus of a decent team, it remains to
be seen if 1) they stay together long enough to have that chance 2)
these players do eventually develop.
Right now their biggest question mark has to be the pitching staff.
They aren't going anywhere in the next two years with this group.
Spud
|
63.9 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Jan 15 1993 17:27 | 19 |
| > I think a lot of people would like to see the Indians do well. It'd be
> fun to see what Cleveland Stadium would be like with 60,000 to 70,000
> crazy people for baseball.
See the movie "Major League" 8^)
> Right now their biggest question mark has to be the pitching staff.
> They aren't going anywhere in the next two years with this group.
Well, Nagy is good.
And he's from UCONN too!
8^)
'Saw
|
63.10 | | SALEM::DODA | Bill's Pork Parade Rolls on | Tue Mar 23 1993 08:34 | 7 |
| Steve Olin, Tim Crews and Bob Ojeda were involved in a boating
accident yesterday. Olin died instantly. Crews reportedly died
this morning. Ojeda is listed in critical condition. The boat
they were in slammed into a dock which extended out into the
lake.
daryll
|
63.11 | Bad news for Tribe fans! | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Mark Price = 3 pt ace! | Tue Mar 23 1993 09:01 | 0 |
63.12 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie has a tooth!!! | Tue Mar 23 1993 09:06 | 0 |
63.13 | | SALEM::DODA | Bill's Pork Parade Rolls on | Tue Mar 23 1993 10:42 | 10 |
| Just got off the phone with a friend in FLA...
He's staying with his uncle in Port Charlotte. He manages the
condo complex that the Rangers stay at. He's close friends with
John Barfield. Barfield is with the Indians this year.
Barfield says that they hit the dock at full speed, CHEST high.
There were no lights on the dock, so they never saw it coming.
daryll
|
63.14 | Big surprise. | SALEM::DODA | Bill's Pork Parade Rolls on | Tue Mar 23 1993 10:42 | 3 |
| Oh, and all the Rangers think Canseco is a stuck up jerk....
dd
|
63.15 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Mar 23 1993 13:33 | 1 |
| huh?
|
63.16 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Mar 23 1993 13:43 | 3 |
| .14 was a continuation of .13
The Crazy Met
|
63.17 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Mar 23 1993 14:00 | 7 |
| Olin had twin boys last August, and a three year old girl...
Really sad.
Nobody said it has to be "fair"...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
63.18 | will we some trading ? | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Mark Price = 3 pt ace! | Tue Mar 23 1993 14:35 | 10 |
|
This is a devistating blow to the Tribe. A questionable staff
at best is now placed in a dark hole and no one knows what kind of
mental effect this will have on the rest of the club. Hopefully
they will use this to bring this team closer together. The Tribe
was ready to turn the corner, and now, it seems that another road
block has been placed in their way. I hope they can pull together!
.........
|
63.19 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie has a tooth!!! | Tue Mar 23 1993 15:12 | 3 |
| re: .18
Who cares about baseball at a time like this?
|
63.20 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | | Tue Mar 23 1993 15:18 | 4 |
| Any mention of alcohol? I didn't hear anything last night
about alcohol on ESPN.
Scott
|
63.21 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shore,Brimsek,Orr,Bourque | Tue Mar 23 1993 15:20 | 15 |
| >
> Any mention of alcohol? I didn't hear anything last night
> about alcohol on ESPN.
I haven't heard any, but hey, even if they had had a few beers, I'd
think that something as long as that pier should have been lighted.
From what I heard it wasn't.
But again, I'm sure I don't have all the details.....
What a tragedy.....
'Saw
|
63.22 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | | Tue Mar 23 1993 15:31 | 5 |
| Definitely shoulda been lights. I was just wondering
if alcohol or drugs had added to the problem of seeing
the pier.
Scott
|
63.23 | how tragic | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Tue Mar 23 1993 15:35 | 1 |
| They never should've left Tucson.
|
63.24 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Arsenio spotted with golf pants... | Tue Mar 23 1993 16:41 | 2 |
| Sounds like alcohol was involved. The pier should have been lit,
obviously. Sounds like it was around dusk.
|
63.25 | Lots of support | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Mark Price = 3 pt ace! | Wed Mar 24 1993 08:21 | 26 |
|
Heard a few different things last night.....true, they did find 6
full beer cans, 1 empty beer can and 1 nearly full bottle of Vodca.
This does not substantiate saying that alcohol was involved nor does
it convict these players of being drunk. Also last night, it was said
that this pier was just extended resently. The pier was only 198 ft
long instead of the reported 250 ft long.
Other reports are that Tim Crews drove the boat at full power into
the dock...why, they say that the throtle was wide open....now, here I
say that the inpact could have caused the throtle to go forward...No
conclusive evidence here. Now, this is the biggie, the word is that
the boat took out two pylons and landed 100 ft further down the lake.
Well, if the throttle got stuck in the forward direction...it would
seem likely that the boat would continue on it way... Nothing
conclusive here either.
Also saw on TV last night the Indians VP and Coach Hargrove. Both
were visibly shaken and said that the Tribe would take care of both
players families as they should. Sort of proud to be a Indians fan!
Good guys!
Bottom line is that the Indians will take care of the surviors and
be OK themselves.
:-(
|
63.26 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shore,Brimsek,Orr,Bourque | Wed Mar 24 1993 08:37 | 35 |
| > Heard a few different things last night.....true, they did find 6
> full beer cans, 1 empty beer can and 1 nearly full bottle of Vodca.
> This does not substantiate saying that alcohol was involved nor does
> it convict these players of being drunk. Also last night, it was said
> that this pier was just extended resently. The pier was only 198 ft
> long instead of the reported 250 ft long.
Heard this morning that one of them had a blood alcohol level of .17, but
they didn't say who.
> Other reports are that Tim Crews drove the boat at full power into
> the dock...why, they say that the throtle was wide open....now, here I
> say that the inpact could have caused the throtle to go forward...No
> conclusive evidence here. Now, this is the biggie, the word is that
> the boat took out two pylons and landed 100 ft further down the lake.
> Well, if the throttle got stuck in the forward direction...it would
> seem likely that the boat would continue on it way... Nothing
> conclusive here either.
From being on a rescue squad for a couple of years, one thing I learned
was that what you normally expect any type of vehicle to do in any
kind of accident is highly unpredictable. That's why the folks who
unravel what happened get paid big bucks...
> Bottom line is that the Indians will take care of the surviors and
> be OK themselves.
Still a tragedy of epic proportions.......
'Saw
|
63.27 | There must be a reason....for all the misfortune | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | Mark Price = 3 pt ace! | Sat Mar 27 1993 10:44 | 43 |
|
To update this file on the boat accident.....the accident has
shocked baseball and brought up many bad memories for the Indians
from years past. This club has certainly gone through alot.
Reports are that a club that was close already has gotten
lots closer. This is a team with the right motivation can be a
contender.
The team will do right by the families of the two dead. This
is a determined bunch.
Ojeda was released from the hospital Thursday and the Cleveland
Plain Dealer reported that no alcohol was found in his blood. Ojeda
was sitting in the back of the boat as it hit the dock which explains
why he only received head injuries (sort of a scalp job). He stated
that before hitting the dock, he did not see it and also said that
he could not remember anything afterward. Blood tests from Olin and
Crews have yet to be released.
Its been reported that the three were heading across the lake to
pick up a friend.
The Indians have played 2 games since the accident and came away
with a 2-2 tie in 11 innings and a 6-5 win yesterday. The clubhouse
is still very quiet but things are getting back to normal thanks to
practices.
No word on if the team will try and pickup more piching help.
It will be interesting to see what the team and league will do to
recignize this fatal accident. The Tribe has already said that they
will wear arm bands and place a plaqe in the bullpens. To designate
the season to the pitchers is probibly another thing that will be done.
I can also see the league do something in memory of the two fallen
pitchers on opening day across the league.
Most people I talk to want to see the Tribe come out of this and
rip the league apart. What a movie this will make someday. The
whole senario reminds me of "Major League" already. What a great
mixture of players on this team. All the ups and downs from Joey Belle
to Wicklander to Olin, Crews and Ojeda. Can't wait to see Ojeda back
on the field!
Go Tribe!
We're all with you!
May your pitches sizzel and your bats thunder!
|
63.28 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Custer/Evinrude WhoKiltMoreIndians? | Sat Mar 27 1993 21:25 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
63.29 | | FDCV06::KING | OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Sat Mar 27 1993 21:42 | 3 |
| Very poor taste Jake... A new low for you...
REK
|
63.30 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Custer/Evinrude WhoKiltMoreIndians? | Mon Mar 29 1993 12:53 | 6 |
| Thanks.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
63.31 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Mon Mar 29 1993 13:23 | 9 |
|
.28 and .30 don't surprise me.
Jake, you'd be singin' a different tune if people were cracking Mario
cancer jokes. Like REK said, a new low for even you.
:^(
Mark.
|
63.32 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Censored fer poor taste | Mon Mar 29 1993 14:24 | 21 |
|
>>Jake, you'd be singin' a different tune if people were cracking Mario
>>cancer jokes. Like REK said, a new low for even you.
Wrongo, Oh Marky-Mark, wrongo.
I think that anybody that knows me knows that I'm AWFUL thick
skinned(and younzes all thought I was fat (8^)*) and cain take a joke
about as good as any. If I would have heard Mario jokes, I woulda been
the one to put them in here, regardless of the situation he's in.
Maybe it is tasteless, or for that matter, the word maybe doesn't
apply, it is tasteless, but, it's a dirty job, and somebody's got to do
it.
The problem with the world today is ALMOST EVERYBODY has some little
ship on there shoulder, very precariously balanced, just waiting fer
the lightest tap to knock it off. What happened to being able to laugh
at a situation to remove some of the hurt and help lighten the mood????
JaKe
|
63.33 | it's taking advantage of other people's tragedies | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Mon Mar 29 1993 14:28 | 1 |
| Nobody was ever called to uphold tasteless "jokes."
|
63.34 | HOw's about jokes about the WTC bomb, r they funny | PFSVAX::JACOB | The King of Poor Taste | Mon Mar 29 1993 14:39 | 4 |
| Hence the name, Evin RUDE!!!!
JaKe
|
63.35 | A VOTE FOR JAKE | WMOIS::FASSETT_E | | Tue Mar 30 1993 11:42 | 7 |
| Hey Jake I share your feelings, I came up with a joke about the
situation the day after it happened. Some people thought it was funny
and others were horrified. I will not put it in here, but for all those
people who thought my joke was tasteless, my reply was the same as
yours was- Somebody had to do it.
p.s. anybody that wants to here my joke send me mail offline.
WMOIS::FASSETT_E
|
63.36 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Tue Mar 30 1993 12:24 | 12 |
| What's Evinrude....is that the brand name of the vodka or something????
As far as a new low goes...I tend to dis-agree...it's just more of the
same stuff we've come to expect from JaKe...ala the Iraq thing, the
Jeffrey Dahmer thing, etc...etc...and I don't think it's meant to cause
pain as much as making light of a rough situation....also it kinda
lends itself to that electronic tavern atmosphere we all love so
much...just wouldn't be the same without Jakey's jokes! (however poor
in taste they might be) :-)
Carlitos
|
63.37 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Tue Mar 30 1993 13:18 | 6 |
| Sorry, Carlos, that doesn't cut it.
It's more like the type of humor you'd expect out of an giggling,
pimpled-face 8th grader.
Mark.
|
63.39 | | FDCV07::KING | OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Mar 30 1993 16:46 | 5 |
| Hey Bill, instead of telling others to get a sense of humor why don't
jake and you try and get one. Some comments are not funny or called
for. This was one of them.
REK
|
63.40 | I got one, how 'bout you? | MKFSA::LONG | I got friends in low places | Tue Mar 30 1993 16:54 | 4 |
| Besides, JaKe dun gradjeated da eighth grade.
billl
|
63.41 | C'mon, laugh at ALL of life, Dammit | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Charley Tuna of SPROTS | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:00 | 29 |
| >><<< Note 63.39 by FDCV07::KING "OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" >>>
>>Hey Bill, instead of telling others to get a sense of humor why don't
>>jake and you try and get one.
Personally, I cain find the humor in just about any situation that's
thrown my way. I don't dwell on the morbidity of the situation and
treat EVERY FREAKIN' THING AS HANDS OFF. Too many people do. Too many
people have forgotten how to laugh. That's why the world's going to
hell in a handbasket, and of all the shortages we have, we have no
shortage of handbasket to go to hell in.
>> Some comments are not funny or called
>>for. This was one of them.
Purely YOUR opinion. What's funny to some, ain't funny to others.
Plus, we know ALL about "opinions".
Leaving all the judgemental BS behind, on wif the subject of the
Cleveland Indians.
I read this morning where the people investigating the accident called
a press conference fer sometime today to announce the results of their
investigation, anybody heard what they said?????
JaKe
|
63.42 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Charley Tuna of SPROTS | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:03 | 8 |
|
>> Besides, JaKe dun gradjeated da eighth grade.
Pssssssssssssst, Bill, don't tell anybody that eight grade was the best
four years of my life, though.
JaKe
|
63.43 | smile | CTHQ::LEARY | WACO: WeAin'tComin'Out | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:07 | 7 |
| -1, JaKe
Ah, was that when they voted you most likely to recede(hairline dat
is)?
8^),
MikeL
|
63.44 | | FDCV07::KING | OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:08 | 5 |
| Why would you care about the results Jake, running out of
things to make jokes out of? Maybe you should sent a joke card to
Olin's and Crew's families..
REK
|
63.45 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Charley Tuna of SPROTS | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:09 | 6 |
| MikeL,
Nah, that was on the third pass thru 11th grade.
JaKe
|
63.46 | fwiw | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:17 | 1 |
| The news just said one of them (forget which) was intoxicated.
|
63.47 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | The Charley Tuna of SPROTS | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:17 | 16 |
|
>>Why would you care about the results Jake, running out of
>>things to make jokes out of?
Do me, REK!!
As stated, I didn't make the damned thing up. Secondly, I thought it
was sick when I heard it, but ALSO funny. I cain see yer bitchin if I
was trying to intentionally hurt someone thru the joke, but it was just
a freakin' joke, not a message to any one person with any intent to
hurt them. I cain take a joke, and give it out. Live a little, why
not laugh at something sometime off the straight and narrow.
JaKe
|
63.48 | | FDCV07::KING | OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:21 | 4 |
| It was Crews..... He was over the legal limit for Florida....
REK
|
63.49 | | FDCV07::KING | OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:25 | 4 |
| Jake, KMA You thought it was funny and sick? apparently you
have never lost anyone to DWI.......
REK
|
63.50 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:27 | 5 |
| And Crews was the one piloting the boat. sigh you would think
people would learn that consuming liquor and driving,etc just
don't mix.
The Crazy Met
|
63.51 | real sad | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:34 | 1 |
| yeah Crews was the one, and I agree TCM (there ya go again!).
|
63.52 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | To Be, or What???? | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:44 | 21 |
|
>><<< Note 63.49 by FDCV07::KING "OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" >>>
>>Jake, KMA You thought it was funny and sick? apparently you
>>have never lost anyone to DWI.......
REK, KYOA, yes I thought it was sick, while still being funny. DWI was
no part whatsoever of the joke at the time it was put in, either. The
DWI part was just announced today, right???????????????
To say now that I'm making fun of DWI is utter bull$hit. Get a freakin
life and take it fer what it was, a joke. Not an attack on anyone or
thing. What's next, if I put in a joke about an animal do I get nailed
from the "Animal Friends" side, or if I put a joke in about an oil
spill, do I get nailed from the Greenpeace side??????
Lose the damned chip, OK??
JaKe
Pure and simple
|
63.53 | At least Raditz is better looking than Jake... | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie has a tooth!!! | Tue Mar 30 1993 17:46 | 2 |
| Hey, if youse guys think Jake is rude, you should meet Dick Raditz. As the
evening roled on, he got even more rude.
|
63.54 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Mar 30 1993 18:01 | 3 |
| oh goodie a brawl in the tavern; haven't seen one of those in a while.
The Crazy Met
|
63.55 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | To Be, or What???? | Wed Mar 31 1993 00:42 | 6 |
| Crews' blood-alcohol was .14%, Olins was .02(or thereabouts) and
Ojeda's was .006. The limit fer driving a car, or a boat in Fla is
.10%.
JaKe
|
63.57 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Wed Mar 31 1993 08:34 | 9 |
| We've got one guy in here who just lost a son in an accident and I'm
sure there are others who have lost children (myself included) of their
own. I'm sure there are a whole lot of us that have known someone
who's died as a result of someone driving drunk. And we've got a couple
of f'in p-brains who get woodies making jokes of tragic accidents.
Now you tell ME who should go get a life.
Steve
|
63.58 | | FDCV06::KING | OH NO!!!! I'm a bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Wed Mar 31 1993 08:57 | 3 |
| Thanks Steve, you said what I was feeling...
REK
|
63.59 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shane, The Wonder Dog | Wed Mar 31 1993 09:27 | 15 |
| Okay, folks.
I think we've just about beat this horse to death. Let's just let
it suffice that some of you feel one way, some of you feel another way,
and that we're all different in the way we deal with things.
Okay? Okay.
Get the hint?
Good.
'Saw
|
63.60 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Not by the hair of my chinny chin chin | Wed Mar 31 1993 11:45 | 15 |
| Thanks Saw...
If you want to make this a DWI discussion, move it to another note.
If it's still an Indians discussion, fine.
As much as I feel for the Indians, it seems to me I can only feel so
bad for Olin and Ojeda if the person the most wasted of the 3 is the
one doing the driving. I don't care if it's his lake and boat. Anyone
who lets a guy that tanked get behind the wheel takes his/her own
chances.
I don't think a joke card is in order, and it's a tragic case, but it
seems to me that they had the opportunity to prevent this from
happening to some degree.
|
63.62 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | To Be, or What???? | Wed Mar 31 1993 16:47 | 6 |
| re.59,
Waht are you REALLY trying to say, Saw???
JaKe
|
63.63 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:07 | 1 |
| FWIW, .1% is the legal limit for most states, not just Florida.
|
63.64 | | CAMONE::WAY | RIP #7 | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:18 | 12 |
| > FWIW, .1% is the legal limit for most states, not just Florida.
In addition, a lot of states are putting in a .07% limit, where you can
be charged for something like driving impaired, which is less serious
than DWI.
Bottom line, it's getting to the point where if you have a couple of
beers, it's best not to drive....
'Saw
|
63.65 | some notes | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed May 26 1993 14:26 | 13 |
|
Albert Bell hit the National League Leading 15th home run the other
day....on the down side...he is protesting a 3 day suspension for going
after the pitcher after he was hit. Didn't see this so....your guess
is as good as mine.
Tommy Kramer pitched a one hitter the other day also....the one
hit came in the 4th and it was a home run. This is only Tommy's 2nd
start of his carrier.
WaHooooo!
|
63.66 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 26 1993 15:58 | 4 |
| � Albert Bell hit the National League Leading 15th home run the other
� day...
Did Bell leave the Indians or have the Tribe joined the Senior Circuit?
|
63.67 | 7-6 over Texas | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Thu May 27 1993 12:32 | 13 |
|
Funny.....sorry...its Albert Belle
And he did it again....Albert Belle collected his 43rd League
leading RBI yesterday.....as the Tribe beat Texas.....part in thanks
to mr. Canseco who used his head to put the tribe on top. From what
I read...Carlos Bierga hit a fly ball to center...it hit Canseco on
the head and bounced over the fence for a hommer.....
WaHOOOOOOOOOO!
|
63.68 | | CNTROL::HUBER | File and Forget | Thu May 27 1993 13:07 | 9 |
|
Re .67
Wrong Carlos (it was Martinez).
BTW - You have to see it. Has to be the funniest baseball play I've
ever seen.
Joe
|
63.69 | Albert Belle does it again....Its out-a-here! | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Thu Jun 03 1993 09:25 | 13 |
|
Albert Belle got his major league leading 16th, 17th and 18th
home run over the last couple of games against the New York Yankees.
He also collected his major league leading 48th RBI yesterday.
The Indians have made resent trades to obtain some pitching.
One starter and one reliever. Matt Young still hasn't won a game.
Seems to only be able to go 4 or 5 innings before getting into
trouble.
WAAHOOOOO!
|
63.70 | suspension upheld | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Fri Jun 04 1993 09:12 | 13 |
|
The suspension of Albert Belle was upheld yesterday. He will miss
3 games, starting Today.
A mistake was made in the reporting of RBI's for Albert yesterday.
After Wednesday's game, Belle actually has a major league leading 51
RBI's instead of the reported 48...
Too bad he is suspended right now with him hitting the ball so well
lately.
WaHoooooo!
|
63.71 | only 9 games out | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Jul 06 1993 09:00 | 33 |
|
Wanted to stay out of here the last few week because I didn't want
to jinks the team. The Indians have been playing some good ball lately
and after a 9 game winning streak, are only 9 games off the pace. Good
pitching and great hitting has been the key.
Albert Belle hit two home runs in the late game yesterday to bring
his total up to 22 which ties him for the lead in the Americal League.
Kenny Loften got hit in the head after a bunt as the pitcher makes
the throw to first base. He shook off the hit.
Lots of talk about the Indians and their logo lately. Now some
group will try to block the building of the new stadium because of it.
Team officials say they will stay with the Chief as their logo when
they move next year. I read that they are looking for someone to take
the huge Chief Wahoo sign at the ballpark because they do not plan on
moving it to the new park. The baseball hall of fame said that it was
just too big for them to take. I hope they don't change the logo. I
honestly don't think it is a logo that demishes Indians at all. In
fact I don't understand why the Indians don't support the Team in a
more positive way. Man, if they were to come up with a team called
the Hungarians or Hunks, I'd support them. :-)
At any rate, with all the pitching problems in Cleveland, they are
still finding ways to win. Think about it, Nagy is out for the season
and practically all the starters that were on the team at the beginning
of the season are now on the disabled list. I look for this team to
play well after the all-star break and surprise many people.
Strange how this season has gone so far...lots of streaks...good
ones and bad ones.
The Chief
|
63.72 | | CAMONE::WAY | Washin' the dog, washin' the dog | Tue Jul 06 1993 09:01 | 5 |
| Not including yesterday's results, the Indians and Red Sox are the two
hottest teams in the AL East. Both were at 5-2 in their last 7 games.
'Saw
|
63.73 | Will it last??? | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Jul 06 1993 09:06 | 8 |
|
Not including the Indians last two losses, the Tribe actually
gained 1 game on the Red Sox. So, with the Sox winning the last
12 of 13, the Indians only lost 1.5 games in the standings against
them.
The Chief
|
63.74 | Maybe they don't like baseball, much less Cleveland | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jul 06 1993 10:12 | 11 |
|
> In fact I don't understand why the Indians don't support the Team in a
> more positive way. Man, if they were to come up with a team called
> the Hungarians or Hunks, I'd support them. :-)
Yeah, it must be those damn *real* Indians that have made the Cleveland
bunch stink for so long. And I'm still blaming the Red Sox' misfortunes
over the years on the Pilgrims...
glenn
|
63.75 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Intel Inside, again! | Tue Jul 06 1993 13:23 | 9 |
|
I've got a great idea for the Cleveland Hungarians new logo. We could
get this gypsy, sorta a Zsa-Zsa look alike with the bandana over the
head, big earrings, and ripped up clothes, etc. have her hand in
someone elses pocket, like she's stealing, and in the background have
six or seven kidsa that are obviously kidnapped. I don't think the
Hungarians would mind, they'd have to support the team.
brews
|
63.76 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | Agassi - the Hairless wonder... | Tue Jul 06 1993 14:11 | 9 |
| Brews -
Yeah! Great logo. If the hungarians did mind, I'm sure another ethnic
stereotype would love to become the symbol of Cleveland's baseball team.
Perhaps a Stephan Fetchit character, or a negro holding a lantern and
call them the Cleveland Negroes. They'd love it!
JD
|
63.77 | Only one Hungarian for Chief Wahoo | AKOCOA::BREEN | Bill Breen dtn: 244-7984 | Wed Jul 07 1993 12:10 | 4 |
| If you wish to replace Chief Wahoo with a Hungarian why not that 90s
corporate hero
Attila the Hun(garian)
|
63.78 | | CAMONE::WAY | We pruned the house too | Wed Jul 07 1993 12:49 | 8 |
| >
> If you wish to replace Chief Wahoo with a Hungarian why not that 90s
> corporate hero
>
> Attila the Hun(garian)
Oh, if only Hawk were still around.......
|
63.79 | Sad | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Nov 05 1993 14:36 | 9 |
| Just heard the news on the radio coming back to the office..
Indians' pitcher Cliff Young was killed in a car accident last night
in his hometown in Texas. No other details.
Tragedy continues for the Tribe.
MikeL
|
63.80 | going for the division | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Wed Feb 09 1994 10:03 | 14 |
|
Well, the Indians continue to make moves. They pick up Tony Pena
for a minor league contract. He may be in as a backup.
So, who is in the Indians division this year. Do the Indians have
a real chance at winning something here??? Looks like the Tribe has
made some moves and picked up some new pitchers. I don't remember if
they signed the one pitcher with the scalp or not...don't think they
did. Will they??? I would think they want to get that memory out of
the clubhouse.
WaHooooooo!
|
63.81 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Wed Feb 09 1994 12:50 | 53 |
|
> Well, the Indians continue to make moves. They pick up Tony Pena
> for a minor league contract. He may be in as a backup.
I hope not... he'd be about my third choice among the players the
Indians actually have signed, and about my 79th pick among the
catchers who could be had cheaply...
> So, who is in the Indians division this year.
Assuming the 3-division system goes through, Chicago, Minnesota,
Milwaukee, and Kansas City.
> Do the Indians have a real chance at winning something here???
Sure. They are significantly better than MIN, MIL, and KC. They
are likely not to be as good as Chicago. Any of the following
could be enough to give the Indians a shot; enough of them, and
the Indians should win the division...
1) Two of the high level pitching prospects (Ogea, Lopez, Tavarez,
Carter, Embree, Mlicki, Byrd) have significant major league
success.
2) Mark Clark pitches as well as he did at the end of 1993, Nagy
pitches as well as he did in 1992, and Martinez pitches at near
his peak levels.
3) Jose Mesa heads off into the sunset in March.
4) Frank Thomas misses significant time in 1994.
5) Michael Jordan starts the year in RF for the Sox.
6) Manny Ramirez starts the year in RF for the Tribe.
> Looks like the Tribe has made some moves and picked up some new
> pitchers. I don't remember if they signed the one pitcher with
> the scalp or not...don't think they did. Will they??? I would
> think they want to get that memory out of the clubhouse.
They signed Martinez; he at least has been a good pitcher, whether
or not he's got anything left. I assume you're talking about
Ojeda, here; he was signed to a minor league deal elsewhere (NYY?).
1994 should be a good season for the Tribe. Their offense should
be better than in 1993, particularly when Ramirez makes the team;
the defense should be better, too, even with Ramirez in the OF.
The starting pitching should be better; hopefully, the youngsters
will be ready to fill the existing holes. If the relief pitching
doesn't come apart, the Tribe should be well-poised for ~84 wins.
Joe
|
63.82 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Wed Feb 09 1994 13:00 | 5 |
| The 3 division /new playoff format did go through a couple
of weeks ago when the players and owners agreed on how to
split the gate from the extra round of playoffs.
Mike
|
63.83 | Now that they're in the Central I'd like to see them win... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 09 1994 13:53 | 17 |
|
> Sure. They are significantly better than MIN, MIL, and KC. They
> are likely not to be as good as Chicago. Any of the following
> could be enough to give the Indians a shot; enough of them, and
> the Indians should win the division...
Good list, Joe. One additional thing that concerns me a bit with the
Indians this year is the fact that the Big 3 of Baerga, Belle, and
Lofton all pretty much had monster years (especially Belle) and the team
still won only 76 games. I don't know if these three cumulatively can
be counted on to be so productive this year (I think Baerga can be even
better; not sure about the other two). That leaves Ramirez, Thome,
Murray, etc. to take up some slack. Obviously the pitching is the
longterm need...
glenn
|
63.84 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 14:05 | 5 |
| correct, Ojeda was signed by the Yankees.
How many people does the new stadium seat?
The Crazy Met
|
63.85 | Call Bob, from Account Temps. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Wed Feb 09 1994 15:37 | 12 |
|
from what I remember...the new Cleveland Statium will seat
somewhere around 35-40 grand.
I figured about the same as Joe...Chicago was going to be the one
to beat to get to the next level.......hmmmmmmm, seems like I heard
this before.......
WaHoooooooo!
Go Tribe!
|
63.86 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Wed Feb 09 1994 17:28 | 42 |
|
Re .83
> One additional thing that concerns me a bit with the
> Indians this year is the fact that the Big 3 of Baerga, Belle, and
> Lofton all pretty much had monster years (especially Belle) and the team
> still won only 76 games. I don't know if these three cumulatively can
> be counted on to be so productive this year (I think Baerga can be even
> better; not sure about the other two).
I don't see any good reason to expect _less_ from the three
cumulatively; Baerga will be 25 this year, Lofton 26, and Belle 27.
While all three had their best seasons to date last year, none was
really out of range; Lofton's was the biggest jump, but with his
background, he's an unusual case. Baerga's been constantly improving
for about 6 years now, and Belle's 1993 wasn't out of line with his
1991.
> That leaves Ramirez, Thome, Murray, etc. to take up some slack.
True; OTOH, they are _much_ better than the players they are
replacing. Vizquel/Fermin is a wash offensively; any additional
at bats from Alomar will improve the offense output from the
catchers. If Hargrove plays his cards right (platooning Vizquel
and Espinoza, starting Ramirez in Cleveland, pushing Alomar to
keep true to his statement that he'll try to be more selective
at the plate, and so on), the Tribe should be able to improve on last
year's 790 runs scored; I personally wouldn't be too surprised if
Cleveland is near the league lead in runs scored this year.
> Obviously the pitching is the longterm need...
Seen the latest Baseball America? The Tribe has continued to
develop a _lot_ of pitching prospects. The big four from last
year are still around; Ogea's the only one still on track, though
Embree could always come back. In their place, though, are Lopez,
and Tavarez, and Carter, and Kirkreit, and Whitten. I know I'm
happy with the development so far, even if it hasn't paid off yet.
I would like to see more position prospects somewhere in the
system, though...
Joe
|
63.87 | They're getting there, but need SP and reliable RP | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Thu Feb 10 1994 08:47 | 8 |
| I'm glad to see Cleveland finally moving in the right direction. They
have several good young players and the potential is definately there.
But until that pitching comes around, I have to disagree that their
chances are "significantly" better than a Minnesota, Milwaukee or KC.
It's Chicago's division to lose right now.
Spud
|
63.88 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 10 1994 09:45 | 11 |
|
> But until that pitching comes around, I have to disagree that their
> chances are "significantly" better than a Minnesota, Milwaukee or KC.
> It's Chicago's division to lose right now.
I'd have to agree. I think that Joe is right if you're predicting what
will happen over the next five years, but right at this moment
Cleveland is in that pack and not indisputably above it...
glenn
|
63.89 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Thu Feb 10 1994 15:10 | 30 |
|
Re .87, .88
> I'd have to agree. I think that Joe is right if you're predicting what
> will happen over the next five years, but right at this moment
> Cleveland is in that pack and not indisputably above it...
I'd have to disagree. Cleveland's clearly superior to Minnesota;
Cleveland scored 100 more runs while allowing fewer _last_ year, and
should be better this year. Milwaukee's closer, with only 50 fewer
runs scored and a slightly better ERA, but for Milwaukee's an older
team - Vaughn's 28, Surhoff and Hamilton are 29, and Yount's in his
late thirties. There are some players who might improve - Nilsson,
Jaha, and Listach should be better in 1994 - but the pitching staff
is no better off and one year older. Given that Cleveland should
show marked improvement, they should have no problem staying ahead of
Milwaukee. Kansas City was the closest to equal with the Tribe in
1994 - 115 fewer runs scored, ~80 more earned runs allowed, plus
some number of unearned runs. But Kansas City is the most likely
to fall apart. Jose should be better, but Brett's gone, McRae
overperformed in 1993, and the rest of the team is getting along
in years. Lind & Macfarlane are 29, Joyner is 31, Gagne and Coleman
are 32, and Gaetti is 35.
Sure, one of these teams _could_ be better than Cleveland in 1994.
And yes, Cleveland's chance in 2-or-3 years are better than next
year. But Cleveland is (IMHO) clearly above Minnesota, Milwaukee, and
KC heading into 1994.
Joe
|
63.90 | Pitching, especially young pitching, is too hard to predict | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 10 1994 17:46 | 25 |
|
>> I'd have to agree. I think that Joe is right if you're predicting what
>> will happen over the next five years, but right at this moment
>> Cleveland is in that pack and not indisputably above it...
>
> I'd have to disagree. Cleveland's clearly superior to Minnesota;
> Cleveland scored 100 more runs while allowing fewer _last_ year, and
> should be better this year. Milwaukee's closer, with only 50 fewer
The analysis is generally sound, Joe, but perhaps as with Spud, I only
object to the terms like "significantly better" and "clearly superior",
etc. We're talking about a group of teams all of which won around 70-75
games last season, except for KC, which played over its head a bit and
won 84. In Minnesota, you're talking about a team that was World
Champion in 1991, won 90 games in 1992, and then suffered a train-wreck
disaster of a season in 1993. They are on the decline (probably not
for long), but there's a basis for believing that they're not near as
bad as they looked last season. Cleveland has hopes, too, but it still
comes down to that shaky pitching staff, where there's a question mark
next to each and every starter's name (including Martinez, based on his
second half). It could be good enough to win at least a wild card, it
could be terrible and result in a 3rd or 4th place finish.
glenn
|
63.91 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Don't ask me, I'm just the adviser | Thu Feb 10 1994 18:55 | 2 |
| They're in the right direction? They signed Tony Pena and Jack
Morris...
|
63.92 | we have the want to win | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Fri Feb 11 1994 07:52 | 11 |
|
The Tribe signs.......
J A C K M O R R I S
to a one year contract.
WaHooooooo!
|
63.93 | Jack Morris? Indians have filled their quota on aging stiffs | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 11 1994 09:19 | 8 |
|
Wahoo is right, Hal. Jack Morris was only *the* worst pitcher in the
league last year, and the second place finisher wasn't close. If the
Indians give Morris 10-15 starts to "work it out" like the Jays did
last year, I'd downgrade expectations accordingly...
glenn
|
63.94 | I'm sure you're glad about that Glenn | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Fri Feb 11 1994 09:50 | 9 |
| >> <<< Note 63.93 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
>> -< Jack Morris? Indians have filled their quota on aging stiffs >-
How'd he get by the Red Soxs? Oh Yeah that's right they moved
buffet table Lou upstairs. Otherwise, Jack would have been in
finishing out his career in Fenway....
mike
|
63.95 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Fri Feb 11 1994 10:14 | 37 |
|
Re .93
> Wahoo is right, Hal. Jack Morris was only *the* worst pitcher in the
> league last year, and the second place finisher wasn't close. If the
> Indians give Morris 10-15 starts to "work it out" like the Jays did
> last year, I'd downgrade expectations accordingly...
But doesn't he make a lovely battery mate for Tony Pena? B^)
Fortunately, none of his contract is guarenteed. The really sad
thing about it is that Morris & Pena could have massive comebacks
and still stink.
On a less negative note, the Tribe signed Steve Farr. Farr did
have a poor year in '93, and is at an age where that could be a
sign of things to come, but had pitched well for a number of
years beforehand and came cheaply. Signing Farr is much like
signing Martinez or Murray - they probably won't really hurt the
Tribe. All I can hope is that Pena was signed to help Levis with
his defense and Morris was signed to keep Martinez happy (he's
complained about the lack of other signing) until Dennis actually
_sees_ how good the kids are. OK, I guess there's the possibility
that he's learned to throw a monster knuckle ball and still has
three years left in him... B^)
Morris - a worse pitcher than Jose Mesa!
Pena - a worse hitter than Jose Mesa!
Re superiority
Hey, I'm a fan of the Tribe - do you expect me to be completely
objective? B^) (I do believe that the expectations for the Tribe
should logically be much better than for the Twins/Brewers/Royals,
but also might admit that my bias plays into that belief...)
Joe
|
63.96 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 11 1994 10:56 | 9 |
| � Assuming the 3-division system goes through, Chicago, Minnesota,
� Milwaukee, and Kansas City.
The 3 division system was a done deal a couple of months ago.
� The starting pitching should be better; hopefully, the youngsters
� will be ready to fill the existing holes.
One of those holes has been filled by old timer Jack Morris.
|
63.97 | Maybe the Sox have changed | AD::HEATH | Have pitchers and catchers reported yet? | Fri Feb 11 1994 11:51 | 4 |
|
Did the Indians GM sit to close to Lou Gorman during the winter
Meetings? :*)
|
63.98 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 11 1994 12:04 | 8 |
| � How'd he get by the Red Soxs? Oh Yeah that's right they moved
� buffet table Lou upstairs. Otherwise, Jack would have been in
� finishing out his career in Fenway....
How soon they forget. Lou passed on Morris before and signed Viola
instead. The Sox are looking for a 5th starter, but so far they seem
to be looking within the organization at guys like VanEgmond and
Quantrill.
|
63.99 | Lou's Rule: when in doubt, sign the guy who's older... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 11 1994 13:16 | 12 |
|
> How soon they forget. Lou passed on Morris before and signed Viola
> instead.
Uh, not quite Mac. Lou had a very clearly stated preference for
Morris, but the Blue Jays outbid the field. Viola was signed after
Morris, late in the signing period. If Lou later claimed that he
somehow made the right choice while the Jays made the mistake then
it's just one more example of Lourevisionism at its finest...
glenn
|
63.100 | When's the first broadcast? | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Fri Feb 11 1994 15:56 | 16 |
| Joe, it's great to see Indians fans sticking up for their team. I
think a lot of baseball fans wouldn't mind seeing them do well this
year and you know once that pitching comes around they will be tough.
As Glenn says, it could go either way for them this year. I think the
signing of Eddie Murray will help, but didn't they also pick up
Martinez from Montreal? If not, who was the pitcher they signed awhile
back? I also don't think much of picking up Morris and Pena, but
you've got nothing to lose really.
Hang with them, they should reward you down the road.
Now for my train-wreck Twins... :*) Ahhh, that's another note, but
hey, if the pitching comes around???
Spud
|
63.101 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Sat Feb 12 1994 09:27 | 42 |
|
Re .100
Spud,
> Joe, it's great to see Indians fans sticking up for their team. I
> think a lot of baseball fans wouldn't mind seeing them do well this
> year and you know once that pitching comes around they will be tough.
> As Glenn says, it could go either way for them this year.
That's what I don't agree with. The Indians should be better
everywhere but the bullpen; even that could be more productive this
year if Steve Farr pitches like he did 2 years ago. I don't
believe they will necessarily be in contention this year - _that_
will take some doing - but without anything out of the ordinary
(such as an Aaron Sele-like preformance by one of the young pitchers)
85 wins is IMHO a reasonable estimate. If everything breaks right,
they win 95 and the central.
> I think the
> signing of Eddie Murray will help, but didn't they also pick up
> Martinez from Montreal? If not, who was the pitcher they signed awhile
> back? I also don't think much of picking up Morris and Pena, but
> you've got nothing to lose really.
Yup, it was Martinez. And w/ Morris & Pena, my only worry is that they
will take away playing time from better, but "less proven" players.
Hopefully they'll either flop in Spring training or come back
> Hang with them, they should reward you down the road.
Hey, I'm a Cleveland fan - I've never seen a championship in any sport
during my lifetime, and only a couple of runner-up finishes (by the
Force). Think I'd give them up just because they don't improve
fast enough? B^)
> Now for my train-wreck Twins... :*) Ahhh, that's another note, but
> hey, if the pitching comes around???
Actually, I like the Twins' chances better than Milwaukee or KC.
Joe
|
63.102 | Could this be the year??? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Mar 09 1994 07:41 | 7 |
|
Jack Morris pitched for the first time in an Indians uniform
the other day. The old man pitched two hitless innings and only
threw 17 pitches. The Tribe is now 4 - 2 in exibition.
WaHooooo!
|
63.103 | WHY NOT? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Mar 28 1994 08:46 | 13 |
|
I also predict that the CLEVELAND INDIANS will win the Central this
year.
Gotta see the movie.....MAJOR LEAGUE II
My only question is...when did MAJOR LEAGUE come out? I was
thinking that I came out the year Synider was on the cover of Sports
Illustrated. Does anyone know?
Wa HOOOOOOOOOOO!
|
63.104 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Gotta go running - April's coming | Mon Mar 28 1994 16:07 | 3 |
| � thinking that I came out the year Synider was on the cover of Sports
Sid?
|
63.105 | | CAMONE::WAY | Valor | Mon Mar 28 1994 16:35 | 8 |
| Major League -- it came out after Sheen was in Platoon. Platoon was
in 1986, so I'd be ML came out in 1987 at least. I don't believe it
came out before Platoon....
'Saw
|
63.106 | | HANNAH::ASHE | like sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his lives | Mon Mar 28 1994 17:25 | 2 |
| It was before Wesley Snipes became big... I'd say ML was more like
90 or so... Post LA Law (Bernsen)
|
63.107 | Nino Brown rules the World!!!1 | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean's gone fishin' | Tue Mar 29 1994 09:15 | 5 |
|
too bad Wesley now feels too big to do the Sequel. He's a great actor
and will be sorely missed imo........
mike
|
63.108 | Pre-season ends. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Apr 01 1994 08:39 | 7 |
|
Looks like the Indians are ready to go. Jack Morris is pitching
strong and the Tribe is getting the runs.
Today, the Indians play the Reds in Columbus in the Annual Ohio Cup
game. I have no idea of the Annual record. Anyone???
WaHooooooo!
|
63.109 | "Major League II" | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Apr 04 1994 07:43 | 9 |
|
Well, I had to see the movie "Major League II" yesterday. Before
seeing it I went out and rented "Major League" again. I won't say
much about this movie because I know all of you will be going down to
see it. I will say that if "Major League" was a 5 tear jerker and 2
hankies, "Major League II" is a 3 tear jerker and 1 hanky. My bet...
there will be a "Major League III" comming soon...the Big one.
hw
|
63.110 | don't do it again | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Apr 05 1994 10:14 | 14 |
|
Yabbut Hal,
Just a nit 'cause you probably forgot but in da ::Sportsbar, we
describe moovies as "Cindy" movies. Hankies are used to describe dat
moovie star, Tom Hankies, son of Mr. and Ms. Kleenex!
;^)
I remain,
honking in hankies!
Kev
|
63.111 | not bad for a Cindy movie | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Tue Apr 05 1994 13:11 | 1 |
| I saw the "Joy Luck Club" over the weekend.
|
63.112 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Tue Apr 05 1994 13:24 | 10 |
| How's the new park?
I saw bits and pieces of it on the Sunday night ESPN telecast, and
it looks fascinating.
I'm really thrilled with this tendency to be building parks more like
the olds ones (ie Camden Yards and now Cleveland and Arlington)....
'saw
|
63.113 | Indians win another on the road! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Apr 13 1994 09:14 | 13 |
|
The Tribe has finally started the season on the right foot. Now
5-1 and going strong. Good pitching from Clark, Martinez, Morris
and Naggy. The rookie Danny R. is ripping the ball.
Go Tribe!
WaHooooo!
The Chief...
|
63.114 | 6-5 win | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Apr 14 1994 08:30 | 9 |
|
The Tribe wins again and has the best record in the American
League!
Go Indians!
WaHooooo!
The Chief...
|
63.115 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Damn, that toe hurts!!!!! | Thu Apr 14 1994 16:37 | 6 |
| Hey Hal,
ya happen to see that there's still 150+ games left on the schedule????
JaKe
|
63.116 | Best start that I can ever remember! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Apr 15 1994 12:47 | 6 |
|
Ya-but, when the tribes best record at the start of season since
1966 was 10-9....you have to be just a little excited.
Wa Hoooo!
The Chief...
|
63.117 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Brillant, Charming and Nasty | Fri Apr 15 1994 13:52 | 4 |
|
but when was the last time you were just a little excited, Hal?
mike
|
63.118 | now 7-4 and still in first. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Apr 20 1994 08:40 | 13 |
|
Well, it didn't last for long......the Indians lost three in a row,
in Cleveland against the Royals over the weekend. But, they are back
on their winning ways winning last night 7-6 against Minn..
I really don't like how these games have gone since the start of
the season. Seems like they have been winning in the late innings and
haven't been getting strong relief work from the bullpin.
Go Tribe!
WaHooooooo
The Chief...
|
63.119 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Wed Apr 20 1994 13:15 | 31 |
|
Re .118
> I really don't like how these games have gone since the start of
> the season. Seems like they have been winning in the late innings and
> haven't been getting strong relief work from the bullpin.
The bullpen will be fine; or at least, Plunk, Lilliquist, and Farr
(if he stays healthy) will be, and likely Turner as well. Mesa still
can't pitch, though.
Actually, now that the season's underway, I like the Tribe's chances
a bit more:
1) Ramirez is the right fielder.
2) Nagy is pitching well.
3) Clark is pitching well.
4) Most of the AAA staff is pitching well.
5) Morris is pitching close to 1992 levels, which isn't good, but
is potentially useful.
OTOH:
1) Vizquel is hitting second.
2) Hargrove is using the sacrifice _far_ too much.
On the balance, it looks like the Tribe should be able to stay in
the race, which it wasn't clear they would manage going into the
season.
Joe
|
63.120 | still in the hunt! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue May 17 1994 08:52 | 36 |
|
The Tribe has been haveing their trouble as of late but after
sweeping the Tigers they are only 1.5 games back of that other
Chicago team.
As mentioned in the Browns note, the Indians went on a big loosing
streak, someing like 1-7 on the road. From what I
read/heard/watched, most of the problem has been with the fielding
and pitching. You can't win games when you give up 6 and 7 runs
a game. Things seem to be comming around now though with the
Indians scoring something like 26 runs in three games. Also lets
give Jack Morris some credit, his last game, 9 K's in 6 innings.
Something like 16 K's for the game with this new guy getting 4 K's
in the 9th.
Hopefully the Tribe can keep things together. Again, as with the
Browns, the Indians will have to win the division to make it to the
playoffs. I just can't see them getting the wildcard spot this
year.
The rookie Manny Ram...is kicking some but. Look down the Leader
stats and all you see in Cleve, Cleve, Cleve.....
Average: Loften & Bell....something like 385.
Runs: Loften over 50
Triples: Bell tops in the league.
Doubles: Bell and Bearga are right there.
HR's: Bell and Rameriz (sp) at 10.
Stolen Bases: Loften leads the league.
Pitching.....this is the problem!!!
Go Tribe!
WaHooooooo!
|
63.121 | winning despite bad pitching | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Twins ERA=Enormous Runs Allowed | Tue May 17 1994 10:21 | 6 |
| As for not being able to win by giving up six or seven runs, yes that's
true over the long haul. But the Twins have found a way, going 18-19
so far with a league worst 6.71 ERA.
Spud
|
63.122 | | MKFSA::LONG | Dancin' INSIDE the fire | Thu Jun 02 1994 16:11 | 8 |
| I just found out that the name of the baseball stadium in Cleveland
is "Jacobs Field".
JaKe, would you care to fill us in on your Cleveland lineage?
billl
|
63.123 | just look at how green the grass is | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Thu Jun 02 1994 16:20 | 1 |
| Jake's ancestors used the sight for their outhouses.
|
63.124 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Thu Jun 02 1994 16:49 | 12 |
|
>>Jake's ancestors used the sight for their outhouses.
How'd ya know that Mike????
Actually, Clevescum's new park is "Jacobs" not"Jacob" like my lasted
name. It scared me in the beginning that some of my family might
actually live there, but then I came to my senses and realized that we
don't have any sh_t shovellers in our fambily.
JaKe
|
63.125 | Indians in "94" World Series!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri Jun 03 1994 13:33 | 16 |
| re: 124
I just can't resist this one.
Jake;
No sh*t shovelers eh?
Just sh*theads!
I personally think that Jacobs field is a class ball park, looking
forward to attending a Indians game there in August.
jeff
|
63.126 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Fri Jun 03 1994 14:06 | 13 |
|
Re .125
> Indians in "94" World Series!!!
Now that's something I can see happening. (OK, it will take a _lot_
of things breaking the right way, but it's not out of the range of
possibility.)
Good luck to you Jeff; sorry to see a vocal Cleveland fan go even if
I think you're deluding yourself w.r.t. the Browns.
Joe
|
63.127 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Tue Jun 14 1994 12:56 | 9 |
|
Worth noting:
1) If the baseball season ended today, the Indians would be in the
playoffs.
2) The Indians have the best home record in baseball.
Joe
|
63.128 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Jun 14 1994 13:20 | 6 |
| If "If and But's" were "candy and nuts", what a fine Christmas we
all would have...
A favorite from second grade...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
63.129 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Tue Jun 14 1994 14:45 | 4 |
|
Hey, for an Indians fan "Ifs" are a big step forward. B^)
Joe
|
63.130 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue Jun 14 1994 15:00 | 2 |
| Yabut if the pitching (read Jack Morris) holds up, I think the Indians have a
legit chance to get into the 'offs.
|
63.131 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Jun 14 1994 15:00 | 4 |
|
Could be worse Joe, Your team might be 75 years w/o a WS
Championship.
|
63.132 | | METSNY::francus | could be heaven or this could be hell | Tue Jun 14 1994 15:09 | 15 |
|
1. Indians getting into the playoffs as a wild-card is one more reason why
the realignment is bogus. If they were finally gonna get into the playoffs
they should have to win the division.
re: .131
2. Indians last won the WS in 1948, pennant in 1954. Fortunately for
their fans since 1954 the Indians have never contended; heartbreaks
happen when a team is soooo close and just can't win. Consider if
the Red Sox had not had any real contenders for 75 years or the Rangers in
54 years the frustration wouldn't be quite the same as it is; probably
not even close.
The Crazy Met
|
63.133 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Jun 14 1994 15:29 | 5 |
| Try being a Cub fan...
1908 and counting...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
63.134 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Tue Jun 14 1994 15:53 | 5 |
|
po' po' TCS, still trying to convince somebody that his suffering is
the greatest....
;^)
|
63.135 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | TCM - World's Greatest Sandbagger | Tue Jun 14 1994 15:59 | 7 |
|
> po' po' TCS, still trying to convince somebody that his suffering is
> the greatest....
Kind of tough to argue with him. The poor SOB has to be around himself
24 hours a day. If that ain't suffering...
|
63.136 | now what was that Tommy said about getting personal? | METSNY::francus | could be heaven or this could be hell | Tue Jun 14 1994 16:00 | 6 |
| nah, Red Sox fans have suffered longer and have had worst nightmares - Rangers
have been frustrating but so far nothing quite like 1986; after tonight that
may no longer be the case.
The Crazy Met
|
63.137 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Tue Jun 14 1994 16:39 | 16 |
|
>>Hey, for an Indians fan "Ifs" are a big step forward. B^)
"If" yer uncle had t_ts, you'd call him aunt!!
"If" a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass every time he jumps!!!
"If" a Clevescum fan had brains, he'd root fer a real team from
Pittsburgh.
JaKe
|
63.138 | Best in the Central | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Jun 15 1994 08:28 | 11 |
|
Indians on the war path! Takes game two from Toronto. Mesa gets
the win and the Tribe is on a 4 game roll. First place all by
ourselves. What a deal!
Go Tribe!
WaHooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.139 | another sweep! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jun 16 1994 08:18 | 13 |
|
The beat goes on in the Rock n Roll capital. The Tribe sweeps the
Blue Jays winning the final game in 13 innings, 4-3. This makes 6 in
a row and something like 15 straight at Jacobs field. The 14 or 15
straight is the best ever for the Indians since 1957.
WaHooooooo!
Looks like another sweep may just happen this weekend with the Red
Sox comming to town. And with the way their playing, it looks like the
streak may go on.....and on.......and on.......and on.
The Chief
|
63.140 | Just curious why your in here only when things are goin well | AD::HEATH | This is it.. the end of the curse. Sox '94 champs | Thu Jun 16 1994 09:35 | 10 |
|
Yo Chief.....
About the Red Sox comming to town and the possibility of a sweep.
Would you care to back that statement up?????
Jerry
|
63.141 | why ask why | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:55 | 6 |
| re: .140
that is the Hal we all know, never here when the going gets tough.
The Crazy Met
|
63.142 | Clemens is going Saturday, I'm holding out for one ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 16 1994 11:13 | 10 |
|
> that is the Hal we all know, never here when the going gets tough.
Well, even as bad as the Sox are playing right now, if he has the
cajones to make such a blatant KOD prediction as a four-game Indians'
sweep, he better have his butt back in here Monday if it doesn't
happen... ;-)
glenn
|
63.143 | What are you willing to do if they do??? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jun 16 1994 11:18 | 14 |
|
Clemens is washed up! It will not be him that beats the Tribe if
they lose.....one game. The way the Indians have been playing at home
(best in the majors), the possibility is certainly there. You can bet
the park will be sold out each and every game!
WaHoooooooo!
The rookie goes tonight and this will be the sox only chance for a
win in Cleveland! Lets ROCK!
GO TRIBE!
The Chief
|
63.144 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Thu Jun 16 1994 11:32 | 5 |
| > Clemens is washed up!
Yes, folks, there you have it. Objective Baseball Analysis according
to Hal.....
|
63.145 | And since when is Jason Grimsley a rookie? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 16 1994 12:02 | 13 |
|
> -< What are you willing to do if they do??? >-
Are we talking my one Boston win to your Cleveland sweep? How about a
week of "Morris/Clemens can't sniff Clemens'/Morris' jock?" (They're
not going head-to-head, alas, but it'll do). Granted, the risk on my
part isn't that great, but those who know me will vouch that the
chance would be the most personally distressing result possible, so
the payoff's big. And since you're the one flapping your gums about
a sweep...
glenn
|
63.146 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Thu Jun 16 1994 13:02 | 7 |
| � Are we talking my one Boston win to your Cleveland sweep? How about a
� week of "Morris/Clemens can't sniff Clemens'/Morris' jock?" (They're
Better watch it with those quotes Glenn. One slip of the Caps Lock
key and the ::SPROTS community gets in a lynching mood...
/Don
|
63.147 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Thu Jun 16 1994 13:05 | 8 |
|
Hal you can't really believe Clemens is wahed up do you? He's
better than any tribe pitcher including Mr Clark. It's his team that
sips not him.
Chap
|
63.148 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Thu Jun 16 1994 14:27 | 21 |
|
Re .147
> Hal you can't really believe Clemens is wahed up do you? He's better
> than any tribe pitcher including Mr Clark. It's his team that sips
> not him.
Including Mr. Clark? Clark's the third best pitcher on the Tribe
right now, _maybe_ second best, and that's only if we don't include
the prospects.
And while Clemens is doing better than Nagy this season, I wouldn't
be terribly surprised if Nagy has a better career from this point on
(though, career-wise, he's obviously not going to catch Clemens).
Risking the wrath of the Baseball Gods, I'll join Hal in his
prediction for a Tribe sweep. Knowing how poorly my predictions
come out, this is almost certainly a KoD, but what the heck...
Joe
|
63.149 | It's a long season - or is it? | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Twins ERA=Enormous Runs Allowed | Thu Jun 16 1994 14:36 | 10 |
| Maybe I'm bold or maybe not, but it seems to me this would be the time
for Boston to rebound a little. They've gone through a bad stretch
(especially at home) and it will do them a world of good to get away
from Fenway now.
I look for Boston to at least split. Then my Twinners can take over
first! That's if we continue our winning ways. :*O
Spud
|
63.150 | Just say the word | AD::HEATH | This is it.. the end of the curse. Sox '94 champs | Thu Jun 16 1994 14:51 | 12 |
|
OK Chief and Joe.....
I am willing to make any type of non-monitary wager ie pname bet with
either or both of you. Cleveland will not sweep and my guess is a
split. Please let me know if either of you are interested I would be
glad to take you up on it. And as far as Clemens and being washed up
I will say that game will be won by the sox.
Jerry
|
63.151 | Swindell > Clemens | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:31 | 18 |
|
I think I would rather play this series for a buck a run........
and I still don't think the sox will turn it around in Cleveland.
The Tribe is ROCK'EN right now. Murphy is killing the ball.
Did anyone see Suwey (SP) pitch the other night?? What a wild man.
But he can surely throw one hell of a fast ball! No control
though. At the end of the game with guys on 2nd and 3rd, 1 run
lead and its..........STRIKE THREE! You see him comming off the
mound with this wild look in his eyes...F__K YEA! he says....if you
read lips.....
Ok, which games are on the tube this series???
WaHoooooo!
The Chief
|
63.152 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:36 | 1 |
| Okay, who slipped the LSD into Hal's coke again?
|
63.153 | Is SUWEY an Arkansas boy? ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:42 | 11 |
|
> -< Swindell > Clemens >-
The correct spelling and case for this comparison is SWIDELL > CLEMONS.
As expressed above, it just doesn't make any sense.
Funny, I didn't see any response to Jerry's or my p-name bait...
glenn
|
63.154 | | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:43 | 6 |
| Folks this may be the only time you ever see Glenn offer a p_name
bet - I know I can't remember another time that he has done that. Take
him up on it, don't lose out on this unique opportunity.
The Crazy Met
|
63.155 | That's right, my p-name space is virginal... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:45 | 1 |
|
|
63.156 | too good of an opportunity to pass up... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:52 | 4 |
|
can I take you up on it?????????
;^)
|
63.157 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Thu Jun 16 1994 16:22 | 6 |
|
Re .153
I took Jerry up on his offer via email.
Joe
|
63.158 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Thu Jun 16 1994 16:49 | 4 |
|
It's Glenn or nothing for me.........
;^)
|
63.159 | I'm waiting for Hal... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 16 1994 17:29 | 8 |
|
> It's Glenn or nothing for me.........
For you MikeC, substitute Maddux' name for Morris' and you've got a
deal. You really think that the Indians are going to sweep?
glenn
|
63.160 | Lets R O C K | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jun 17 1994 08:24 | 32 |
|
AAAAAAHHHAAHHAAHAHA! I was laughing my butt off last night and
almost woke up the whole family when the game ended. Why should I
expect less??? Not this year, the Indians have gotten where they are
right now because of the late inning heroics just like yesterdays game.
With the Tribe playing this well, this early in the season...anything
is possible. Cleveland, for the last several years always seemed to
start the season bad but end playing some of the best ball in the
league. I hope the trend continues this year.
I thought it was great watching that game. How many people were
there? At many parks, going into the ninth down two runs, the stadium
would be half empty. Oh NO! Not in Cleveland! I don't think one fan
left the game. Here we were, bottom of the ninth, two outs, down by
one run, winning run on 2nd, the best hitter on the Tribe at the plate,
1st base open,..........the crowd is standing and going crazy, the song
"WE WILL, WE WILL, ROCK YOU" is playing in the background.........the
pitch.........the swing..........SMACK!!! Albert Belle lines a single
to left center......one run scores......Carlos Bearga turns third base
and slides head first to home plate......the throw is wide and the
place goes wild!!!! Man, it was like we just won the world series. I
really wonder how we will handle the playoffs this year.....Its going
to be one hell of a ride! YeeeeeHa!
Looks like I'll be taken out the broom this weekend.......
WaHooooooooooo!
Did ya see the resturant out in the left field corner? Looked nice!
The Chief
|
63.161 | damn ear wax, I thought I heard you say... | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jun 17 1994 09:13 | 4 |
| did you really say, first base was open, winning run on second and he
pitched to albert belle?!!!! Two outs???
I was gonna let butch break .500...
|
63.162 | Show some Jewels | AD::HEATH | This is it.. the end of the curse. Sox '94 champs | Fri Jun 17 1994 09:38 | 10 |
|
Hey yo Chief.....
I still see your talking trash why not show a little guts like Joe
and back that prediction of a sweep up. I quess what Jake says is true
about people from Clevescum.
Jerry
|
63.163 | 1 down, 3 to go... | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Fri Jun 17 1994 09:40 | 19 |
|
Re .161
Can't really blame Hobson too much for that one. If you pitch around
Belle, it's only to get to Murray, who still eats up righties. And
Belle _hasn't_ hit Russell historically.
I was impressed with Grimsley's outing. He was striking batters out,
not walking batters, and not giving up many hits. Sure, you don't
want to see the home runs, but I can live with that from a fifth
starter.
Meanwhile, Sele was living on the edge; if it weren't for his control,
the game would have been a blowout. Perhaps he's coming back from
his overuse.
That had to have been the most enjoyable game I've seen in a while...
Joe
|
63.164 | worth the try, seeing my pname like a cathouse | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Fri Jun 17 1994 09:40 | 10 |
|
Glenn, I'd root for just about anybody to hang a pname on ya, but I do
like the Indians. Simply because they've been so inept for years and
I like Joey Belle......
anyways if you still want to bet let me know today before 11:00 as I'm out
here around then...but I get choose the pname you wear if by some miracle
they do sweep........
mike
|
63.165 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Russell must die! | Fri Jun 17 1994 10:10 | 14 |
|
Testing, testing...
> anyways if you still want to bet let me know today before 11:00 as I'm out
> here around then...but I get choose the pname you wear if by some miracle
> they do sweep........
What the heck, you're on, if you don't mind waiting behind Joe Huber if
the Indians do sweep (geez, still nothing from Hal). I have it on good
authority that Roger's grandmama is going to be at the game Saturday,
which gives me renewed confidence... ;-)
glenn
|
63.166 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Fri Jun 17 1994 10:37 | 18 |
| > the Indians do sweep (geez, still nothing from Hal). I have it on good
C'mon Glenn.
You've been in this file for years. You KNOW Hal.
He talks trash when the team is winning, disappears for weeks when they
finally turn belly-up and glassy-eyed, and then comes back crowing for the
start of the next Cleveland season.
Would Hal EVER back up his predicitons with a p-name bet? Not on yer
life. Take it to the bank.....
'Saw
|
63.167 | He is a *fan* | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | You promised to retire,right Jeff? | Fri Jun 17 1994 10:42 | 10 |
|
> He talks trash when the team is winning, disappears for weeks when they
> finally turn belly-up and glassy-eyed, and then comes back crowing for the
> start of the next Cleveland season.
...but you gotta love him...
glenn
|
63.168 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Fri Jun 17 1994 10:44 | 9 |
| > -< He is a *fan* >-
A fan sits here and takes it when his team takes the gaspipe.
> ...but you gotta love him...
Wouldn't be SPORTS without him!
|
63.169 | I'm going to the closet....... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jun 17 1994 12:09 | 11 |
|
WAAAAHOOOOOOOOOO!
GAME 1: TRIBE 7 - 6
GAME 2: TRIBE (FILL IN ANY NUMBER YOU WISH)
GAME 3: TRIBE " " "
GAME 4: TRIBE " " "
The Chief
|
63.170 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Fri Jun 17 1994 12:40 | 6 |
| At least Hal is main enough to give the points when his team
is favored, unlike another one who talked trash about how his team
was going to crush and demolish the Pats then refused to give a
lousy 10 points... 8^)
/Don
|
63.171 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Sat Jun 18 1994 00:58 | 8 |
|
In case anyone misses it in light of the (at this time) ongoing
OJ saga...
The Tribe won 8-1 tonight. Halfway to a sweep - the toughest one
comes tomorrow...
Joe
|
63.172 | I'm really enjoying this... B^) | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Sat Jun 18 1994 18:37 | 11 |
|
3/4 of the way home. Wasn't so tough after all, I guess; unfortunately
I missed the game but I do understand there was some controversy about
something.
Nagy vs. Finvold tomorrow. My personal name is now safe; the same
can't be said for Jerry and Glenn.
Joe
P.S. Now with no "if"s - the Indians _have_ the best record in the AL.
|
63.173 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Sun Jun 19 1994 17:08 | 4 |
| I can't wait to see the p_name's that some folks will be wearing.
The Crazy Met
|
63.174 | B^) | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Sun Jun 19 1994 19:46 | 23 |
|
Re .173
Any and all suggestions may be mailed to TRIBE::HUBER. B^)
It was Morris rather than Nagy today; which, now, I'm glad for, since
Nagy will pitch the next game.
I think Hobson could get fired as a result of this series; from what
I saw and listened to of the games, that's not really fair, but that's
baseball. And I do like Wathan as a manager.
Hargrove really seems to have the Tribe together now; while I'm
not convinced that he's the best manager in the world, he seems to
do a number of things well - use the running game, manage personalities
and egos, get _everyone_ work (though he does have a doghouse for the
bullpen), and other than Baerga he seems to be getting the young
hitters to walk.
9 in a row overall; 18 in a row at home. I don't remember the Indians
ever being in such a good position in June.
Joe
|
63.175 | Excuse me....what did you say?? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Jun 20 1994 08:02 | 15 |
|
As I said.....
SHOOSH SHOOSH SHOOSH
Next.....Detroit
WaHooooooooo
The Chief
|
63.176 | Waitin for Joe to show to be humiliated | AD::HEATH | This is it.. the end of the curse. Sox '94 champs | Mon Jun 20 1994 08:24 | 7 |
|
Go away Cheif....If you had any faith whatsoever in your team you'd a
steped up to the plate and took the pname bet. Crawl back under the
rock or better yet take a swim in that river that catches on fire....
Jerry
|
63.177 | The streak continues... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Jun 20 1994 08:40 | 12 |
|
Funny how you want to give me crap but where were you when I
offered the buck a run deal??? Don't feel bad bud, the Tribe is
the best in the American League! Why would you expect to do any
better than just making a few games close? Get a new team! Join
the waggon, jump on board for the ride of a lifetime.
WaHoooooooooooooo
SHOOSH SHOOSH SHOOSH SHOOSH
The Chief
|
63.178 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Clemens can't carry Morris' jock | Mon Jun 20 1994 09:34 | 20 |
|
As I can't yet get into my mail account on another node to receive my
punishment from Joe, the above is a preview for Childsey...
> 3/4 of the way home. Wasn't so tough after all, I guess; unfortunately
> I missed the game but I do understand there was some controversy about
> something.
Well, it was 1-1 with two outs in the sixth before Belle hit that
two-run HR. As is often the case with this sorry-assed bunch, the
first mistake Clemens makes will often be enough to cost him
the ballgame. The controversy came an inning later when Baerga
hooked one foul past the RF foul pole, which was ruled fair by Greg
Kosc (not that it mattered by that point). Apparently Kosc's
blindness continued into Sunday on a play at the plate, but I didn't
personally see it as, fortunately, I was not able to torture myself
watching any of these games (just heard some of Saturday's)... ;-)
glenn
|
63.179 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Mon Jun 20 1994 09:46 | 6 |
| > Funny how you want to give me crap but where were you when I
> offered the buck a run deal???
Where he should have been. You know the rules about monetary wagering
in here....
|
63.180 | | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Mon Jun 20 1994 09:56 | 4 |
|
I sent you mail Glenn hopefully you'll get it soon and wear it proudly...
;^)
|
63.181 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 20 1994 09:57 | 17 |
|
Jerry & Glenn,
After going over various ideas (Clemens put downs, Hobson & Russell
deification, and so on), I've decided instead to go with the above.
Short, sweet, and to the point, if not as nasty as some would prefer.
Hal,
Try the above pname for a week. If we've got 4 people - just 4 people
- using this personal name, they'll think it's a movement.
And that's what it is. The End of the Curse of Colavito Movement.
Anyone else is welcome to join in... B^)
Joe
|
63.182 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 20 1994 10:26 | 15 |
|
You're a class act, Joe. While vultures like TCM interrupt their
Simpson suicide watches to revel in another's personal misfortune,
we still have such stand-up guys as yourself and Mike Childs (I
think; I'm awaiting that mail message-- I thought we had a deal on
that grotesque "jock" thing) to whom I don't mind losing a p-name bet.
Fortunately, my fortunes weren't left in the hands of Hal, the Great
Stoneless One... ;-)
Of course, there's always the risk that once you've got Red Sox fans
doing this, a massive August/September choke and collapse are sure to
follow. But I'm not complaining!
glenn
|
63.183 | still can't believe they swept em' | CHIEFF::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Mon Jun 20 1994 10:32 | 7 |
|
well Glenn, I did ask to pick the pname of my choice but if it's too much
for you when you see it you're welcome to use the 'jock' think except
replace Morris with Maddux naturally.......
;^)
|
63.184 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Mon Jun 20 1994 11:01 | 5 |
|
| You're a class act, Joe. While vultures like TCM interrupt their
| Simpson suicide watches to revel in another's personal misfortune,
I told you Huber was OK!
|
63.185 | Cleveland the Regurlar Season Superstars.. THEN GONE | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jun 20 1994 11:30 | 8 |
| I dont think it matter's that much this year what the Indians do in
the regular season.. If you look at cleveland as a whole you have the
Cavs that cant get by Detroit, The Browns that cant be by Denver and
now the Indians... Whats Clevelands tallies for Championships in the
last 25years (2 and 1/2 Decades, lets not drudge up things from before
I was born :-)...)
MairB
|
63.186 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 20 1994 11:36 | 18 |
|
Re .185
Cleveland itself has one championship in the past 25 years - the
'93-'94 Cleveland Crunch.
NE Ohio has a few more - the Canton Invaders dominated the NPSL for
the first 7 or so years of its existance.
It should be pointed out that (1) the Indians have never lost a
non WS playoff game, and (2) the Indians have a winning record in
the WS (both in individual games and in series). B^)
It also should be pointed out that the Indians have won not one,
but two World Series since the last time either Chicago team won
one. B^)
Joe
|
63.187 | Regular Season has less importance this year in Baseball | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jun 20 1994 11:48 | 32 |
| NO Offense but who the hell cares about the Cleveland Cruch or the
Canton Invaders or for that matter what they hell are they a Tittly
Winks and Chess Team :-)
I was only talking about the 4 real sports, you know the big leagues
I dont care how many little league titles theyve won.
Just seems to me (Of course I only watch Basketball/Football) that
Cleveland seems to be better at choking in the big games then winning
them... Since Im a youngin and have only watch Football/Basketball
since the late 70's I cant recall a dominating team in either Football
or basketball (Of course Im not one of those guys that reads/buys the
Football/Basketball Digest/record books each year either).
This year in baseball you need to go thru a few rounds of playoffs
before the world series (YES ???) so the regular season has lost a
little bit, this was the one thing that made the WS so exciting only
2 of the best 4 teams had a shot at it... Hockey I consider the reg
season as pre season, although with expansion I dont know the exact
% of teams that make the playoffs but at one time it was 72+%....
Not That Im a Bears fan but they won it all less then a decade ago,
and we know what the bulls have done in the past decade. Did the
Indians win the WS in the past 25 years (Shows what I know :-)..) ?
I watch baseball when Im at my Inlaws House (they dont miss a sox's
game)... other then that I'll watch the world series...
I just dont think you should be calling the Indians the best based on
what they do in the regular season.. Look at Seattle in basketabll alot
of good being the best in the regular season did for them :-)
MairB
|
63.188 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Mon Jun 20 1994 12:49 | 4 |
| More like Joe is a wimp
The Crazy Met
|
63.189 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:30 | 5 |
| Glenn, Glenn, Glenn... You should know better than to bet anything
on the Red Sox! It would've been better to take the PawSox against
the Charlotte Knights.
/Don
|
63.190 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:31 | 16 |
|
> NO Offense but who the hell cares about the Cleveland Cruch or the
> Canton Invaders or for that matter what they hell are they a Tittly
> Winks and Chess Team :-)
Soccer.
> I just dont think you should be calling the Indians the best based on
> what they do in the regular season...
But I didn't; I just noted that they have the best record in the AL.
In fact, I'm not at all convinced that they are the best team in the
AL; I'd have to pick the White Sox, to be honest. Baltimore's up
there as well; the Indians, Yankees, and Blue Jays are a step behind...
Joe
|
63.191 | Don't worry Joe, it's going back pronto... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Clemens' Stats = Huge Strikezone | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:54 | 19 |
|
> Glenn, Glenn, Glenn... You should know better than to bet anything
> on the Red Sox! It would've been better to take the PawSox against
> the Charlotte Knights.
At this point, 11 in a row, only one loss away from the franchise
record for a losing streak (it'd be a real shame if they won tonight
and Butch didn't have his name and his name alone associated with
that record for posterity), I deserve... no, I *want* to suffer.
It's only right...
And MikeC, as for your p-name above, it's so preposterous on the face
of it that I'll proudly wear it as a paean to His Greatness. One
cannot help but read that p-name without applying the heaviest of
sarcasm. I'd stick a haughty "Ha!" at the end of it but I wouldn't
want to violate the letter nor the spirit of the bet... ;-)
glenn
|
63.192 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:00 | 3 |
63.193 | but it looks so good... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:56 | 4 |
|
that maybe Glenn but Mike JN and few others agree with me.......
;^)
|
63.194 | I'm goen to the closet...... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jun 21 1994 08:34 | 21 |
|
The Tribe once again dominated the game from start to finish and
beat the slumping Detroit Tigers in Detroit by a score of 7-1. This
makes 10 straight wins as the Indians remain the hotest baseball team
in the Major Leagues.
In last nights game, the Indians stold 6 bases. Charles Nagy got
the win. Yes this team is hot and now hold a 4.5 game lead in the
Central with the best record in the American League.
What a deal, I really don't think I was ever this much into
baseball this late in the season. Usually the season is already over
by now. The people back home are going crazy. From what I heard the
other day, the stadium is now sold out for their next home stand of
11 games which is to start after this series. If the Tribe sweeps
Detroit....watch out....the city will be going crazy with the Indian
fever.
WaHoooooooooo!
The rookie Grimsley goes tonight.
The Chief
|
63.195 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 09:31 | 11 |
|
Re .194
Hal,
Grimsley's not a rookie - he's young, but he first came up with the
Phillies, walked as many as he struck out, and pitched just as poorly
for the Indians last year. He did pitch very well in AAA this year,
though, and looks to have turned the corner.
Joe
|
63.196 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 10:05 | 1 |
| Hal, you better get a roll of Bounty, else you're gonna make a mess.....
|
63.197 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 10:48 | 8 |
|
> Hal, you better get a roll of Bounty, else you're gonna make a mess.....
At least he has the decency to keep going to the closet... ;-)
glenn
|
63.198 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:03 | 5 |
| They better slow that bandwagon down some before it passes my house,
an out of shape ex-soccer player could get hurt when trying to jump
on that puppy...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
63.199 | Who says baseball's not exciting? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:14 | 6 |
|
So, are the Indians going to break the Red Sox' 1988 record of 24
straight wins at home? P-name bet, Hal? ;-)
glenn
|
63.200 | ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jun 21 1994 12:27 | 1 |
|
|
63.201 | Did Heiser quit? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Ate a hot dog, made me feel good | Tue Jun 21 1994 12:28 | 0 |
63.202 | Would like a piece of the action if Hal is willing | AD::HEATH | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 13:10 | 7 |
|
Glen.....
Hal aint got no guts to make a pname bet like that.
Jerry
|
63.203 | On the war path... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jun 21 1994 14:32 | 19 |
|
HaaaHaaa,
I'd really have to be a fool to accept a bet like that.
The possibility is there for sure and they will surely get the support
from the fans but to win 6 more games straight is going to be tough to
accomplish. If any team can do it, it will be these up and comming
Indians.
BTW, in my closet....I keep the broom! One down and two
to go....
SWOOSH.....
WaHoooooooo!
I wana go home!
The Chief
|
63.204 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 14:38 | 15 |
| > HaaaHaaa,
> I'd really have to be a fool to accept a bet like that.
> The possibility is there for sure and they will surely get the support
> from the fans but to win 6 more games straight is going to be tough to
> accomplish. If any team can do it, it will be these up and comming
> Indians.
HAHAHAHA yerself Hal.
You'll crow about your team in here, but when the hottest team in the
majors is on the line for something important, you start sandbaggin'
just like TCM.
I'm thinking that Hal is out-sandbagging TCM here.....
|
63.205 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:19 | 13 |
|
Saw,
> You'll crow about your team in here, but when the hottest team in the
> majors is on the line for something important, you start sandbaggin'
> just like TCM.
Something important? I didn't realize the record longest home
winning streak was important. A nice accomplishment, certainly,
but how is one loss followed by 25 wins followed by one loss any
better than one loss followed by 13 wins, 1 loss, and 12 more wins?
Joe
|
63.206 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:29 | 17 |
| >
> Something important? I didn't realize the record longest home
> winning streak was important. A nice accomplishment, certainly,
> but how is one loss followed by 25 wins followed by one loss any
> better than one loss followed by 13 wins, 1 loss, and 12 more wins?
>
More sandbaggin.....
It goes to all the crowing about how great the Tribe is. If they're
so great, they should easily be able to run that little streak out and
set the record.
'Saw
|
63.207 | Let's see if the Indians, and Hal, are up to the task | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:37 | 12 |
|
> A nice accomplishment, certainly,
> but how is one loss followed by 25 wins followed by one loss any
> better than one loss followed by 13 wins, 1 loss, and 12 more wins?
Okay, if the Tribe wins the 25 out of 26, Hal wins the bet. The 1988
Red Sox under General Joe Morgan were men enough to win 24 out of 25
(Clemens lost the game before the streak of 24 started, and lost the
game to end it, believe it or not...)
glenn
|
63.208 | Give the Indians a break | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:44 | 7 |
| Isn't it interesting that the sox fans have to drag up an old
meaningless record to try and hide the pitiful performance of the
current red sox. Its nice to see the Indians finally have a reason
to be interested in baseball this late in June. Whether the Indians
swoon or not they did sweep the Sox over the weekend.
BTW I am a fan of the "pitiful" A's.
|
63.209 | Now don't go spoiling our fun, Mr. Mendez... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:48 | 1 |
|
|
63.210 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 15:56 | 35 |
| >> Something important? I didn't realize the record longest home
>> winning streak was important. A nice accomplishment, certainly,
>> but how is one loss followed by 25 wins followed by one loss any
>> better than one loss followed by 13 wins, 1 loss, and 12 more wins?
> More sandbaggin.....
How in the world was I sandbagging? I didn't voice _any_ opinion as
to whether or not they can do it; I just questioned the importance
of whether or not they do so. To be honest, I think they _can_
do it; they are on a great roll right now. But if I was given the
choice of a win to give them the streak and 2 losses later or a loss
to end the streak and 2 wins later, I'd take the 2 wins.
> It goes to all the crowing about how great the Tribe is. If they're
> so great, they should easily be able to run that little streak out and
> set the record.
Easily? Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the '94 Indians
are the best team ever. (I'm not claiming this, and never have, BTW.)
To be the best team ever, they'd have to win games at a something
approaching a .750 clip; let's farther assume that this requires
winning 90% of their home games. (I'm fairly certain no team has
ever won 90% of its home games in MLB, or anywhere near that.)
A team that wins 90% of its home games (going 73-8 at home) has a
7.2% chance of managing a 25 game home winning streak.
A team that wins 90% of its home games has a 48% chance of extending
an 18 game home winning streak to 25 games.
So even for a better team than baseball has ever seen, taking an
18 game streak to 25 isn't easy.
Joe
|
63.211 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:04 | 44 |
| Boy, you Tribe fans sure are a TESTY bunch! Someone piss in yer cornflakes
this morning?
> How in the world was I sandbagging?
How about humor? How 'bout "I was kidding you?"
|> It goes to all the crowing about how great the Tribe is. If they're
|> so great, they should easily be able to run that little streak out and
|> set the record.
|
| Easily? Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the '94 Indians
| are the best team ever. (I'm not claiming this, and never have, BTW.)
| To be the best team ever, they'd have to win games at a something
| approaching a .750 clip; let's farther assume that this requires
| winning 90% of their home games. (I'm fairly certain no team has
| ever won 90% of its home games in MLB, or anywhere near that.)
|
| A team that wins 90% of its home games (going 73-8 at home) has a
| 7.2% chance of managing a 25 game home winning streak.
|
| A team that wins 90% of its home games has a 48% chance of extending
| an 18 game home winning streak to 25 games.
|
| So even for a better team than baseball has ever seen, taking an
| 18 game streak to 25 isn't easy.
JEEZ, Joe, do you have to take the FUN out of EVERYTHING? I was just
joshin' around (no offense Josh from Vancouver_eh) and you're throwin
all of these here dastisticks at me.....
I'm going to go get a soda because my mind is all boggled now......
[8^) in case you missed it!]
'Saw
|
63.212 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:10 | 13 |
|
Saw,
> Boy, you Tribe fans sure are a TESTY bunch! Someone piss in yer cornflakes
> this morning?
That's what happens when your team stays in the basement for 34
straight years and then starts winning... B^)
Sorry about the statistics; your note made me curious just how easy
it might be, so I had to figure it through...
Joe
|
63.213 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:16 | 13 |
| >
> That's what happens when your team stays in the basement for 34
> straight years and then starts winning... B^)
heh heh heh
> Sorry about the statistics; your note made me curious just how easy
> it might be, so I had to figure it through...
Well, I was fascinated by it all, but I didn't want to give you the
satisfaction after the spanking your bad boys gave the Red Sox this
past weekend....8^)
|
63.214 | Surprise they aren't celebrating their 75th Annive | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:54 | 12 |
|
Joe. Get a life!
Joe get used to them Sox fans wanting to make bets and calling
you a Sandbagger and all, they did the same thing to TCW when he was
just rooting on his team. When you haven't won something for 76 years
you gots to make up things to hide your own teams inadequacies.
Chap
|
63.215 | btw, after further review, the Sox won 26 of 27 in 1988 | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:55 | 8 |
|
In case anyone couldn't tell from my p-name, I am a bored-again Indians
fan, and I hope they take the AL pennant after the Yankees suffer the
embarrassment of losing to the wildcard team, or better yet the AL West
champions...
glenn
|
63.216 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:59 | 3 |
|
Bandwagon Jumper!!!
|
63.217 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Jun 22 1994 08:27 | 12 |
|
The winning streak ends at 10. The Indians lost this game in the
9th. Up 5-1 going to the bottom of the 9th, the bullpen couldn't throw
a strike. Grimsley pitched a near perfect 8 innings but Shuey and
Lindquist could hold the lead. Another stolden base for Loften.
Home streak still alive though. Game today at 1pm. Hopefully we
can be updated in here...
WaHoooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.218 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Wed Jun 22 1994 09:55 | 11 |
|
I'm not surprised Glenn....
;^)
Joe, the Celtics in the glory years of the 80 went 40-1 one year at home
loosing only to Portland. That's ungodly .975 winning percentage. What's
even more amazing is that they did it without any help from the refs....
;^)
|
63.219 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Jun 22 1994 10:04 | 9 |
|
Mike,
Even a team that plays .975 at home would only have a 53% chance of
putting together a 25 game streak. Of course, no baseball team is
going to play .975 at home (winning 79 games) unless the game of
baseball goes through some terribly unlikely changes...
Joe
|
63.220 | ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Wed Jun 22 1994 10:14 | 6 |
|
I just figured it was my duty to point out to you that some team somewhere
had gone over 90% at home. Given it was the C's made it more enjoyable for
sure.
mike
|
63.221 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Wed Jun 22 1994 10:14 | 4 |
|
Did also mention how enjoayable it was to remind TCM about it?????
;^)
|
63.222 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 10:24 | 51 |
| re Chappy:
Man, you must've been beaten as a child. 8^)
Red Sox fans don't look to hide the inadequacies of their team.
We revel in it, we rejoice in it. It's a given, like Tantalus
reaching for the grapes which always receed from his touch, that
the Championship will always be just out of reach.
In that angst there is purity, a crucible as it were that burns
away impurities of faux fans, and leaves behind a tempered, pure
fan.
It's easy to be a fan of a team that's won a lot of world series.
It doesn't tax the mind, strain the heart, and raise a lot of
questions in the Id.
To be a fan of a truly bad team, like the Boston Braves, or the
Washington Senators (first in the nation, last in the American
League), is almost as easy, because oft times there's humor
in the consecutive losses, the inept play, and the gimmicks
they try to use to win.
Ah, but to be a fan of a team that teases you, that beguiles
you with its charm only to turn on you with the fangs of
a Black Widow.....that takes a special breed.
You know from the start the way it will go, you know from the
moment the last note of the Star-Spangled Banner fades away
on Opening Day that you'll be watching football in October
and not the Red Sox sipping champagne. Do we complain?
Not so seriously. Do we wail in ajbect misery? No too much.
The fact that it's been 76 years is not something we shrink
from, that we hide or are ashamed of. No, no, quite the
opposite. What you would so easily deride and make fun
of we wear as a badge of honor... What appears ignominious
to you is glorious to us.
For one day, perhaps when Glenn and I are old and grey, we
will taste the nectar from the Promised Land. We'll know
the ultimate joy. And that joy will be all the sweeter,
and all the warmer for all the waiting....
And in that moment, I'll actually feel sorry for the Yankee
fans. For no victory is so sweet as that tasted by one
accustomed to defeat.........
'Saw
|
63.223 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Jun 22 1994 12:19 | 3 |
|
sniff sniff,
|
63.224 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 12:36 | 7 |
| > sniff sniff,
Whatta you mean, sniff, sniff?
I'm proud to be a Red Sox fan....
|
63.225 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Jun 22 1994 13:06 | 6 |
|
You brought a tear to my eye.
Chappy
|
63.226 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 13:13 | 5 |
| >
> You brought a tear to my eye.
>
Oh, well, maybe Tito can get you a tissue.....8^)
|
63.227 | Wana play a HR game??? Lets do it! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jun 23 1994 08:23 | 30 |
|
Another victory, another series win, another streak begins. The
Tribe beats Detroit with the long ball and takes the series 2-1 and
begins another winning streak. Dennis Martinez gets the win going
6 1/3. Thome hits two homers and Kenny Loften gets another stolden
base.
The Indians are off today and start a 11 game home stand playing
New York on Friday. With 19 straight home victorys, the Tribe needs
to win its next 6 games to break the record. Playing the second best
team in the American League this weekend will be a good test for these
hungry band of wild men.
Loften and Belle are eating up the league this year. They
collected 5 hits in their win yesterday as they battle each other for
the batting title.
Look for Cleveland to be Indian crazed for the next two weeks.
Fans will be comming out of the woodwork. Just look around....the guy
pumping gas...has an Indian hat on. The guy at the bar with all those
women on his arm....has an Indian hat on. The boy playing catch with
next door neighbor....both have signed Indian gloves. The girl with
the bikini over there.....has the Chief tatooed on her A$$.
Yes, this is a different team and a different city with people
realizing the Indians with the Chief (Wahoo) is real and ready to
contend....THIS YEAR!
Go Tribe!
WaHoooooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.228 | We're not the Sox!!!!!!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Thu Jun 23 1994 09:21 | 10 |
|
Whatta ya say Hal or Joe. A little P-name bet that the Tribe Does
not sweep? :-)
Chappy
|
63.229 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Jun 23 1994 09:38 | 10 |
|
Chappy,
I don't think the Tribe is likely to sweep; the Yankees are deep in
lefthanders, who the Tribe has more trouble with.
Watch out for Ramirez this weekend, though - he's eating lefties
alive...
Joe
|
63.230 | Streak will end | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Jun 23 1994 12:00 | 8 |
| Belle and Lofton battling each other for the batting title? They first
have to catch Frank thomas and Paul O'Neill. I wouldn't be surprised
if the Yankees came in and swept the series like they did in NY last
month.
Indians may miss facing Key. They should be able to light up
Mulholland. Abbott is inconsistent.
|
63.231 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Jun 23 1994 13:42 | 22 |
|
> Belle and Lofton battling each other for the batting title? They first
> have to catch Frank thomas and Paul O'Neill.
Catching Paul O'Neill will take care of itself; he started the season
playing way over his head, and is already coming back down to earth.
Frank Thomas is another matter altogether; it's really scarry that,
as incredible a year as Belle has had (if he stays on his current
pace he'll have the best offensive year since a guy by the name of
Ted Williams), Frank Thomas still has a .075 SLG lead and .046 OBP
lead.
> I wouldn't be surprised if the Yankees came in and swept the series
> like they did in NY last month.
I would be very surprised if they did; that's a pname bet I'd take
any day. The Indians have played much better at home, are hot, have
a fifth starter now, and won't be playing against the park by having
their righties in the lineup.
Joe
|
63.232 | Of course it's Jeff "Big Loo" Bagwell in the NL... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Valdera-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha | Thu Jun 23 1994 15:12 | 13 |
|
> Frank Thomas is another matter altogether; it's really scarry that,
> as incredible a year as Belle has had (if he stays on his current
> pace he'll have the best offensive year since a guy by the name of
> Ted Williams), Frank Thomas still has a .075 SLG lead and .046 OBP
> lead.
For as much attention (deserved) as Griffey's getting for the HRs,
forget about him being the biggest offensive force in baseball, Frank
Thomas is once again the man, and it's not even close...
glenn
|
63.233 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Jun 23 1994 15:42 | 16 |
|
Re .232
> <<< Note 63.232 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN "Valdera-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha" >>>
Did the week end when I wasn't looking? B^)
> For as much attention (deserved) as Griffey's getting for the HRs,
> forget about him being the biggest offensive force in baseball, Frank
> Thomas is once again the man, and it's not even close...
Of course, Griffey's season is _all_ the HRs. Belle is only .047
behind Griffey in SLG, and more than makes up for that by being
.052 ahead in OBP.
Joe
|
63.234 | Trader Lou Rooooooooooooools | AD::HEATH | Indians in '94 | Thu Jun 23 1994 16:20 | 8 |
|
Glen....
Who is this Jeff Bagwell guy? Sox fans keep bringing him up and a
mistake was made by mangement. This couldn't be true. I refuse to
believe that guy in Houston was ever in the Red Sox organization,
no way. :*)
|
63.235 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 27 1994 10:02 | 9 |
|
Oh well...
I saw nothing of the games this weekend, but 2 were played, and 2 were
lost. Had to happen sometime, I guess...
Time to start a new winning streak, I guess... B^)
Joe
|
63.236 | | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Mon Jun 27 1994 11:50 | 4 |
| yabbut where is Hal????
The Crazy Met
|
63.237 | Not hard to predict | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Jun 27 1994 12:44 | 18 |
| As expected.
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.230 CLEVELAND INDIANS 230 of 236
OPTION::LAZARUS "David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353" 8 lines 23-JUN-1994 11:00
-< Streak will end >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Belle and Lofton battling each other for the batting title? They first
have to catch Frank thomas and Paul O'Neill. I wouldn't be surprised
if the Yankees came in and swept the series like they did in NY last
month.
Indians may miss facing Key. They should be able to light up
Mulholland. Abbott is inconsistent.
|
63.238 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 27 1994 13:24 | 12 |
|
OK, so it was a good call (though only playing 2 games certainly made
the task easier). If they hadn't put Shuey out there in the 8th
yesterday, the Tribe might have even won one.
A disappointing weekend, yes. The end for the Tribe, no (though
probably the end for now for Shuey, and Morris seems to be back to
throwing batting practive).
Still enjoying this season,
Joe
|
63.239 | Ball 4. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Jun 27 1994 13:46 | 14 |
|
Both loses this weekend were caused by poor pitching. Yesterday
Morris had 6 walks and the Friday extended game I think we had another
5 or 6 walks.....you can't win games by giving them runners that they
don't deserve.
Must have been a hell of a game yesterday though.....12-11. Thats
the way you like it....lots of runs....
Belle hit two homers over this last weekend with the one yesterday
being a 3 run shot.
Baltimore tonight.....should be another tough series.
WaHoooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.240 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Jun 28 1994 10:03 | 10 |
|
:-)
Indians can't play with the AL East.
Yanks 6-0 against the Tribe this year!
Chappy
|
63.241 | another loss | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jun 28 1994 12:44 | 10 |
|
Hey, Hey, Hey...
None of this now.
WaHoooooo
The Chief
|
63.242 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Jun 28 1994 13:20 | 15 |
|
Re .240
Chappy,
Isn't that 4-0? If I remember correctly, the Indians only played
two in NY, and they just played two in Cleveland.
And they can play with the AL East - they've done fine going up
against Detroit, Boston, and Toronto, and haven't played Baltimore
enough to matter yet.
It's just the mighty Wade Boggs that gives 'em fits... B^)
Joe
|
63.243 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Jun 28 1994 14:36 | 9 |
|
Your probably right Joe, thats what I thought too but I could of
swore I saw 6-0 on that screen???
Chap
|
63.244 | 6-0 it is | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Jun 30 1994 00:57 | 1 |
| Yanks swept 4 from Tribe in NY so they are 6-0.
|
63.245 | Another 1 run game... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jun 30 1994 08:15 | 13 |
|
The tribe is on a bad streak....loosing in the last inning. This
makes two of three games lost in the last inning. They did however
win game two in the last but it shouldn't have even gotten to that
point. The relief pitching may be in trouble...Shuey was just placed
on the Dis list the other day. Let hope the Indians can pull this
game out tonight and split the series with Baltimore. The Twins come
to town over the weekend and this will even be another good series.
Nothing comes easy for the Tribe.
WaHooooooooooooo
The Chief
|
63.246 | No need for the pen... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jul 05 1994 08:17 | 18 |
|
The Tribe is on the WAR path again...now winning 5 straight and 6
of their last 7. No need for the bull pin lately with the pitching
staff starters completing 4 of the last 5 games.
The Indians picked up pitcher Jeff Russell from the Red Sox. Can
see nothing but good out of this trade. Thanks very much!
Albert Belle is terring up the league the last week hitting 4 HR's
and ready to take the batting title lead being just a few points off
the pace. Kenny Loften has moved into 3rd place just behind Belle.
Hmmm, who was saying there was no way these two guys would challenge?
On the road to Texas today.....hope the good pitching and great
hitting keeps up!
WaHooooooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.247 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jul 05 1994 10:09 | 6 |
| > The Indians picked up pitcher Jeff Russell from the Red Sox. Can
> see nothing but good out of this trade. Thanks very much!
Yeah, if you like cancer.....
|
63.248 | We'll take him.....] | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jul 05 1994 10:22 | 25 |
|
The cancer was that known as the Red Sox Blues!!! With the Tribe,
different chemistry, a real team and something more than hearing
everyone moan.....Russell will prove to be more of a gain than a
loss. I don't think Russell has even pitched yet for the Indians.
The way I see it.....Russell will can only make this Indian team
better. With Shuey out for 15 days DL, Russell will be this teams
closer for awhile. Honestly, I hope he doesn't see much work.
Good job Cleveland front office!
This trade will go down like the others....take a chance and give a
player a good team, good coaches and run potential....they will go
far....ie: Morris.....Martinez.....Russell.....
With Albert, Kenny, Carlos, Eddie and the rest of the crew, you
can't go wrong.
What did the tribe outscore the Twins by this weekend....something
like 32-12.
WaHooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.249 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Jul 05 1994 10:23 | 16 |
|
You never know, Russell might pull a Jack Morris and (1) pitch well
while (2) being positive. At least that's what I'm hoping happens.
Hal - the bad thing that can come out of the trade is Nabholz regaining
his 91-93 form while Russell continues to blow up. Farr's no loss
even if he does come back, really, but Nabholz could be.
Nice to see the Indians push the Twins farther back - it's worth
noting that the Twins and Indians finish their season series this
weekend. Cleveland's won 7 of 9 so far.
1st place on the 4th of July. If the Tribe can stay ahead of just
one of NY/Baltimore/Chicago, they should make the playoffs... B^)
Joe
|
63.250 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jul 05 1994 10:31 | 10 |
|
Yabbut on Saturday, double eue eee eee aye talk radion was doing a
wonderful "glad yer outa here" thang on Russell. So were the callers.
The guy was a Class "A" malcontent (so they said).
I remain,
keeping my POPB outa thisted
Kev
|
63.251 | HAL, wake up and smell Lake Erie... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue Jul 05 1994 10:38 | 9 |
| | Yabbut on Saturday, double eue eee eee aye talk radion was doing |a
| wonderful "glad yer outa here" thang on Russell. So were the callers.
| The guy was a Class "A" malcontent (so they said).
Yabut they've said that about him on every stop he's made in his career. HAL,
just hope tha the can pitch, because it is almost guaranteed that he will be
a bad influence.
=Bob=
|
63.252 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Tue Jul 05 1994 11:16 | 11 |
| Russell was a classic case that was similar to a Project leader we had
in my group who fortunately is not with the company any longer. (He knew
he was layoff meat).
His modus operandi was to blame everything that went wrong because of his
own ineptitude on everyone else. It destroyed morale and basically sucked...
Russell was the same way.....
'Saw
|
63.253 | It really can't hurt. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jul 05 1994 14:07 | 18 |
|
I really don't think the rest of the Tribe will let Russell do
anything to upset the chemistry of this team. It will be hard for him
to do with him not knowing really anyone else on the team. I think he
will have to prove himself to the Indians first before he can do any
damage. Do you really think he will be there next year??? I don't.
He is here to do what he can untill Shuey comes back and to give Mesa
some rest every now and again.
YES! 1st Place at the All Star break I can honestly say I've
never seen before. Ahhhhhhh, this is nice!
Go Tribe!
WaHooooooooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.254 | Can't wait to see the Tribe in Boston | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Tue Jul 05 1994 14:26 | 10 |
|
Chief
I'm sure all the A's thought the same thing. You'd be surprised how
fast a cancer can spread when you don't pitch when given the ball. IE
my tummy hurts, gotta hangnail, the moon is full......
Jerry
|
63.255 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Jul 05 1994 14:42 | 9 |
|
What does everyone who leaves Boston via trade or being released
a trouble maker?
Chap
|
63.256 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue Jul 05 1994 14:56 | 8 |
|
| What does everyone who leaves Boston via trade or being released
| a trouble maker?
Assuming you mean "Why..."
Uhh, other players have left Boston besides Russell and Boggs.
|
63.257 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jul 05 1994 14:59 | 2 |
|
Bruce Hurst wasn't a "troublemaker". Quite the opposite.
|
63.258 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Jul 05 1994 15:41 | 9 |
|
Boggs, Plantier, Fisk (The 1st year he left I heard this) Burks,
(clemens mentioned it),now Russell?
Chap
|
63.259 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue Jul 05 1994 15:44 | 1 |
| Hurst, Boddiker, Anderson, Bagwell, Quantrill, Hatcher, Valle...
|
63.260 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jul 05 1994 15:49 | 2 |
| Perry, Casey, Wickford, Hamilton, Thornton, Howard......
|
63.261 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Tue Jul 05 1994 15:49 | 1 |
| I don't remember Eckersley being tagged as a trouble maker either.....
|
63.262 | GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.......... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Jul 05 1994 15:57 | 5 |
|
O.K not everyone. :-)
|
63.263 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Tue Jul 05 1994 16:14 | 3 |
| Bagwell wasn't a RedSox yet.
Add Oil Can Boyd to the list...
|
63.264 | Too bad, I liked Dennis. | SALEM::DODA | Workin' on mysteries without any clues | Tue Jul 05 1994 16:34 | 6 |
| Can says he can still pitch, yet, even with the sad state of
pitching in baseball today (Can you say Dave Righetti?), no one
wants him. Either he's lyin' or the Sox just may have been right
this one time.
daryll
|
63.265 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Tue Jul 05 1994 16:36 | 2 |
| Not when he was traded...
|
63.266 | | SALEM::DODA | Workin' on mysteries without any clues | Tue Jul 05 1994 16:41 | 1 |
| True.
|
63.267 | Always playing it both ways, these NYers... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | R-r-r-r-roberto Baggio! | Wed Jul 06 1994 14:11 | 8 |
|
Give it up, Chap. Two weeks ago you yourself would have gladly labeled
Russell the cancer of the century (as you did with Boggs when he was on
the Sox). The notes in here attesting to Russell's attitude were
piling up at a record pace *before* the trade...
glenn
|
63.268 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Jul 06 1994 14:18 | 10 |
|
I loved Russell playing for the Sox? He was one of the opposing
teams best players?
And for the 93rd time "READ MY LIPS" I still hate Boggs and I
always will!
Chap
|
63.269 | Jacobs > Fenway | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Drive-by body-piercing | Wed Jul 06 1994 16:19 | 22 |
| Madea road trip to Cleveland with my son coupla
weeks ago to visit my Dad and check out Jacobs
Field. Nice park, clean, spacious, everything, in fact,
that Fenway ain't. Great sound system - the place rocks
when Omar Vizguel comes to the plate. They sell beer
throughout the game (Sam Adams, even!) Easy downtown access,
easy egress after the game to the east, south, and west.
We has seats on third base line, so my son was excited about
getting Sox autographs. But the Tribe sit there, they make
the visitors stare into the sun from the first base line.
Worked out well, though, 'cuz none of the Sox even peeked
out of the dugout, while Baerga, Lofton, Pena, and Eddie Murray
were signing anything that was offered. One exception -
Kenny Lofton with wraparound shades and game face firmly
in place stared down my son and his Red Sox regalia and skipped
to the next kid.
All in all, a fun place to go and a fun team to watch.
I hope they can survive the addition of Russell.
Then again Jack Morris isn't exactly Mr Chemistry either.
dr.a
|
63.270 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Wed Jul 06 1994 16:44 | 8 |
| > -< Jacobs > Fenway >-
Well, considering they had the best of the past 80 years to choose from.
I saw the park on TV the other night and it looks nice.
But it doesn't have any ghosts yet.....
|
63.271 | lost 2 of 3 to Texas | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jul 08 1994 11:36 | 21 |
|
Russell pitched 1 inning the other night.......
stats
INNINGS PITCHED: 1
HITS: 0
RUNS: 0
EARNED RUNS: 0
WALKS: 0
STRIKE OUTS: 2
Good Job Jeff!
WaHoooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.272 | Russell may have the mental edge back | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 08 1994 11:55 | 9 |
| Ironically form wise Russell seemed to have come around just before the
trade. I managed to catch him vs Toronto and he looked very sharp.
Unfortunately pitching is very much a mental thing and there he had
probably lost it with his approach to Duke's activities. Some players
let things like chemistry bother them, some don't. It's the type of
thing a millionaire athelete might have a problem with but a guy in
1953 making 8700 and knowing there's a dozen guys who want his job
doesn't necessarily care about.
|
63.273 | garbage time, he shines. | SALEM::DODA | Workin' on mysteries without any clues | Fri Jul 08 1994 12:38 | 3 |
| Game wasn't on the line was it?
daryll
|
63.274 | still good | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jul 08 1994 13:59 | 11 |
|
No, the game wasn't on the line. The Tribe was leading 13-4 in the
ninth. Just a confidence builder. But, since first writing today,
another guy just told me that he lost a game for the
tribe...when?? Last night? The Indians lost 6-4 but I haven't
seen a box score yet....anyone???
WaHooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.275 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:07 | 14 |
| >
> No, the game wasn't on the line. The Tribe was leading 13-4 in the
> ninth. Just a confidence builder. But, since first writing today,
> another guy just told me that he lost a game for the
> tribe...when?? Last night? The Indians lost 6-4 but I haven't
> seen a box score yet....anyone???
>
I don't know about him losing a game, but it is vintage Russell to
do it when there's nothing at stake.
Put him in a tight situation and he breaks down like an old car.....
|
63.276 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:21 | 8 |
|
Yeah and Ryan did a great job last night huh?
Chap
|
63.277 | | SALEM::DODA | Workin' on mysteries without any clues | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:39 | 12 |
| Nope he got hammered, but you already know that.
Did Ryan chalk it up to "lack of chemistry" afterwards?
Geez, Quantrill must be walking around like he's the 2nd coming
right now the way that Russell (Is that your ERA or area code?)
makes him out to be the vital cog in the sox drive to
contention.
Puh-lease.
daryll
|
63.278 | Russell plays again | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Jul 11 1994 08:26 | 44 |
|
Russell pitched in two games over the weekend.....
In a 4-3 victory on Saturday, Russell got his 12th or 13th save
by pitching the last inning.....
1 inning
0 hits
0 runs
0 earn runs
0 walks
0 strikeouts
In a 9-1 victory over the Twins on Sunday, Russell pitched the
last inning...
1 inning
0 hits
0 runs
0 earn runs
0 walks
0 strikeouts.
Total with the Indians, Russell has given up no hits!
3 innings
0 hits
0 runs
0 earn runs
0 walks
2 strikeouts
1 save
0 wins
0 loses
Great Job!
Keep up the good work and keep saving those games!
WaHooooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.279 | TRIBE ON THE LOOSE | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Jul 11 1994 08:39 | 64 |
|
At the All-star break....
THE CLEVELAND INDIANS ARE IN FIRST PLACE!
THE CLEVELAND INDIANS ARE THE BEST TEAM IN THE
AMERICAN LEAGUE!
THE CLEVELAND INDIANS HAVE THE BEST HITTING CLUB
IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE!
THE CLEVELAND INDIANS HAVE THE 5TH BEST PITCHING CLUB
IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE!
THE CLEVELAND INDIANS HAVE THE BEST HOME RECORD IN THE
MAJORS!
ALBERT BELLE AND KENNY LOFTEN ARE JUST PERCENTAGE POINTS
AWAY OF HAVING THE BEST BATTING AVERAGE IN THE
AMERICAN LEAGUE!
KENNY LOFTEN HAS STOLDEN MORE BASES THAN ANYONE IN THE
MAJOR LEAGUE!
KENNY LOFTEN HAS THE MOST HITS IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE!
ALBERT BELLE HAS THE 3RD MOST HITS IN THE AMERICAN LEAGUE!
ALBERT BELLE IS IN THE TOP 3 IN DOUBLES!
KENNY LOFTEN IS IN THE TOP 3 IN TRIPLES!
ALBERT BELLE IS IN THE TOP 3 IN HOMERUNS!
AND THE LIST COULD GO ON AND ON AND ON............
This is the best Indian team that I have ever seen in my short life
and boy is it nice seeing it happen. The Tribe has just barely
held on to 1st place with the White Sox comming on strong.
Going to the All-star game on Tuesday....
*ALBERT BELLE*
*KENNY LOFTEN*
*CARLOS BIERGA*
*SANDY ALOMAR JR.*
Guys that should be on the list.....
*MARK CLARK*
*EDDIE MURRAY*
*VASQUELL*
Should be an interesting All-star game tomorrow. I'll watch this
game only because of the amount of Indian stars on the team and...
I'd like to see Albert smack a HR, Kenny steal a base and to hear
what everyone has to say about the TRIBE!
WaHooooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.280 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Jul 11 1994 08:54 | 4 |
63.281 | Well, they should be there. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Jul 11 1994 10:09 | 8 |
|
Are you sure about that??? I thought they were alternates...
WaHooooooooooooo
The Chief
|
63.282 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Mon Jul 11 1994 10:11 | 3 |
| When Russell is in a pressure situation, when the games really matter,
you'll see. And then watch him spread the blame around like someone
spreading margerine on a TV commercial......
|
63.283 | And it's LoftOn... | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Mon Jul 11 1994 10:16 | 6 |
| > ALBERT BELLE AND KENNY LOFTEN ARE JUST PERCENTAGE POINTS
> AWAY OF HAVING THE BEST BATTING AVERAGE IN THE
> AMERICAN LEAGUE!
Who isn't?
|
63.284 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Jul 11 1994 11:23 | 24 |
|
Belle and Lofton are having truly had amazing seasons so far. If it
weren't for the superhuman year Thomas is having with the bat, Belle
would be my pick for MVP (yes, over Griffey), and Lofton would be
my fourth choice.
7 of the Tribe's starting 9 are now in double digits in home runs -
Lofton, Baerga, Belle, Murray, Thome, Alomar, and Ramirez. Sorrento
will make it also - somehow I don't think Vizquel will, though...
The one player the Indians could most afford to lose to injury:
Eddie Murray.
The one player the Indians can least afford to lose to injury:
Charles Nagy.
Charlotte (AAA) is in first place; Canton-Akron (AA) is lagging
behind though.
And the Columbus and Kinston teams have some serious prospects.
Wahoo indeed!
Joe
|
63.285 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Jul 12 1994 09:19 | 23 |
|
Was listening to some random call-in sports show last night, when
the topic of 1st half awards came up. (My picks: MVP - Thomas,
Cy Young - Cone, ROY - Ramirez, MOY - Hargrove.) Their picks were
largely the same, and mostly irrelevant, until they came to Hargrove.
After praising him for the job he's done, the announcer said
something to the effect of "of course, re-alignment has really
helped Cleveland" to which the caller replied something to the effect
of "yeah, if they were still in the AL East they'd probably be about
4 games back."
Huh? Can someone explain this? With the same schedule they would
have had without realignment, Cleveland has a 1.5 game lead on NY.
In either the East or central, the Tribe would have had teams
breathing down its neck (NYY & BAL or CHW, KCR, and MIN). How can
it be said that realignment _has_ helped them?
Of course, _will_ help them is another matter; instead of trying to
stay ahead of NYY and BAL, they just need remain in front of 1 of the
3 teams chasing them. But why would anyone expect the Indians to be
46-39 instead of 51-33 just because of realignment?
Joe
|
63.286 | Doesn't make any sence | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jul 12 1994 16:00 | 9 |
|
Jake must have been on the other end of the phone call.......
WaHoooooooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.287 | Lets see who's best now... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jul 14 1994 08:16 | 12 |
|
Big series starts today and won't end untill next weekend is over.
In the next 11 games, the Tribe plays the White Sox 8 times.
Should be very interesting. Nagy goes tonight in Chicago. 4 games
in Chicago this weekend and 4 games in Cleveland next weekend.
Hope Albert gets back on track tonight...he has been in sort of a
slump as of late. Something like 2 or 3 games without a hit.
WaHooooooooooooo
The Chief
|
63.288 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 15 1994 18:08 | 6 |
| And here I thought Hal might have turned a page; Indians lose a big
game after leading 3-0 nary a sign. Joe could be on vacation, yeah
that's it.
The Crazy Met
|
63.289 | Central Division Leaders | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Jul 18 1994 08:14 | 21 |
|
The Indians split the series with the White Sox and remain in 1st.
On Friday, Jeff Russell picked up another save as the big closer.
2/3 Inning
1 Hit
O Runs
0 Earn Runs
0 Walks
0 Strike Outs
ERA with the Tribe = 0.00
2 saves
Keep it up!
WaHoooooooooooo!
The Chief
|
63.290 | TC* watch, Day 1 | SOLANA::MAY_BR | one bourbon,one scotch, and one beer | Mon Jul 18 1994 13:03 | 2 |
|
And where is TC*?
|
63.291 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Mon Jul 18 1994 13:47 | 5 |
| Huh, why in the world would I have to show up here? Enjoy Brews, I'm
outta here for a week.
The Crazy Met
|
63.292 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | The Wind Cries Mary | Mon Jul 18 1994 13:51 | 4 |
| So what is Belle's average now that he's not using a corked
bat? Those Indian players aren't very good at B&E.
/Don
|
63.293 | Albert Belle's bat... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Jul 18 1994 14:06 | 6 |
|
Yea, I heard something about his bat being conficated over the
weekend.....
The Chief
|
63.294 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Gonna bang some heads... | Mon Jul 18 1994 17:24 | 2 |
| Confiscated and then switched a time or two...
|
63.295 | 10 days out of work | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jul 19 1994 08:25 | 24 |
|
From what I heard on the TV last night.....they took his bat over
the weekend and placed it in some umpires office. Over night
someone broke in through the roof and stold it. A different bat
at put in its place...the next night, the original bat (suposably)
was put back. The bat was x-rayed and found to be loaded with
cork.
Question is: How does this help his batting? Does anyone know?
The Tribe lost last night 6-5 to Texas. Don't know how the game
was lost seeing that the Indians were up 5-3 then tied 5-5 in the
seventh.
Farr, who was traded to the Red Sox said he could believe that the
bat of Belle's was corked. He said that at one practice, someones
bat broke and the insides came out. May not have been Belle's
though. Who knows... How many guys in the big leagues use corked
bats???
WaHoooooooooo
The Chief
|
63.296 | | CAMONE::WAY | Come to Butt-head | Tue Jul 19 1994 10:14 | 20 |
| Well, I don't know the physics of it all, but a corked bat will be lighter,
giving you more bat speed. There's got to be a limit to how light a
big bat can be (ie, if it's 34", it cannot physically weigh under a certain
amount, because of the amount of wood it must contain). If you cork it,
you get the same dimensions, with much less weight.
Frank Howard used to start out with a 34oz bat, go to a 33oz, and by
the end of the season was way down under 30oz. The fatigue of a season
makes it harder to get around with a heavier bat.
Then too, I wonder if changing the structure of the bat from a solid to
what is effectively a cylinder filled with a lighter material might give
more "pop" to the ball as it comes off the bat.
This is all speculation. If I knew all about it, I wouldn't be sitting
here, I'd be one of baseball's best hitter (illegaly, like Belle)....
'Saw
|
63.297 | Wow, is this dumb... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Il Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo! | Tue Jul 19 1994 10:31 | 10 |
|
Either Belle or whoever is responsible for this has to win baseball's
Big Dummy of the Year Award (no mean feat there). Albert Belle needs a
corked bat like Nolan Ryan needed a knuckleball. Seriously, there's a
very marginal benefit to using one (physics-wise). If the Indians
slump over those 10 games, heads could roll. As it is, for what is
considered a major cheating offense, he got the minimum penalty...
glenn
|
63.298 | just like the airport | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jul 19 1994 13:59 | 7 |
|
If this is as big a deal as its made out to be....why not have
x-ray machines at every stadium and require all bats to go through
it prior to the game with an ump as witness?
The Chief
|
63.299 | ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jul 19 1994 14:19 | 15 |
|
Yabbut doncha know that the x-ray rays cause a fracture in the
chrystalline lattice structure and make several pockets of high
dislocation densitty?????? Ya know what happens when a 90 mph
fastball comes in contact with one of those sites??? Believe me, it's
not a pretty sight.
Besides, isn't x-raying baseball bats without a warrent in
violation of the 4th amendment or somthin??????
I remain,
Kev_for Perry_Mason_and_Fermi
|
63.300 | One of the most bizarre episodes I've ever heard of... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Il Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo! | Tue Jul 19 1994 14:22 | 10 |
|
> If this is as big a deal as its made out to be....why not have
> x-ray machines at every stadium and require all bats to go through
> it prior to the game with an ump as witness?
Because everyone's not a cheat, requiring hired moles to work the stadium
infrastructure on espionage duty...
glenn
|
63.301 | rats! How'd I miss that????? :*( | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jul 19 1994 14:39 | 1 |
|
|
63.302 | Upset of the year in sprots | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jul 19 1994 15:11 | 4 |
| <<< Note 63.301 by CSTEAM::FARLEY >>>
-< rats! How'd I miss that????? :*( >-
|
63.303 | WaHoooooooooooooooooo! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jul 19 1994 16:41 | 6 |
|
If you think that ole Albert is the only one in the Majors that
use the cork.........I remain mistaken.
The Chief
|
63.304 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | B.Arnold,R.Nixon,A.Belle | Tue Jul 19 1994 17:15 | 2 |
|
|
63.305 | Free Albert! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Il Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo! | Tue Jul 19 1994 17:21 | 11 |
|
> If you think that ole Albert is the only one in the Majors that
> use the cork.........I remain mistaken.
Well, okay, Hal, everyone but Albert should be suspended, because he
was the only one honest enough to admit to having sent the clubhouse
boy through the stadium duct work to break into the umpire's locker
room...
glenn
|
63.306 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jul 19 1994 17:30 | 9 |
| Just out of curiosity, what would you think would be the minimum number
of people both in and out of the Indian's organization that would have been
likely to know about Albert's bat being corked?
Somehow I doubt he did it himself in his basement.
Do you suppose the umpire spotted it himself or was he tipped off?
George
|
63.307 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Tue Jul 19 1994 17:38 | 4 |
| Twas "suggested" to the Umps by White Sox Mgr. Gene Lamont.
JaKe
|
63.308 | Who's got the bat? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Jul 20 1994 08:37 | 47 |
|
No doubt that durring the All-star game, someone asked him about it
and then it was brought to the attention of the White Sox. Big
series between the teams and they thought they needed all the help
they could get. Too bad they only won a split.
Strange thing I heard on the radio on the way into work is that
after the bat was taken from the umps office. An Indians official
returned it. Now, how do we know this is the real bat? Why even
return it at all? I also read in the paper yesterday that Albert
said he is innocent of all charges and will prove it in his
hearing. Also, the company that sells the bats said that they do
make these kinds of bats but do not sell them to the major
leaguers.
I think the team can still win without Albert for 10 games just
because of the great hitters on the team. The Tribe will have no
trouble filling in for him in the field.
On a side note.....The Tribe beat the Texas Rangers yesterday 13-3.
Belle hit his 27th home run...was the bat corked??? Did see
several signs at the stadium...couldn't read them
though...something like 'Belle corked'. Jeff Russell pitched the
last inning.....
1 Inning
2 Hits
0 Runs
0 Earn Runs
0 Walks
1 Strike out
No save....
What a job this Russell fellow has done for the Tribe. Just don't
understand why the Red Sox let him go...must have something to do
with the team chemistry. What do ya think?
Indians still have something to play for in the middle of July.
Red Sox still looking forward to Patriot season. 8-)
WaHooooooooooooo
The Chief
|
63.309 | | CAMONE::WAY | Come to Butt-head | Wed Jul 20 1994 09:50 | 19 |
| >
> What a job this Russell fellow has done for the Tribe. Just don't
> understand why the Red Sox let him go...must have something to do
> with the team chemistry. What do ya think?
>
Hal,
You can print all the Russell stats you want, till you're blue in the
face, but why don't you just save it all up and wait until something
IMPORTANT comes along.
Those are the ones that Russell blows. He can close all he wants
in a situation where he won't get a save, and what does it matter?
'Saw
|
63.310 | Man, is he setting himself up... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Il Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo! | Wed Jul 20 1994 10:37 | 21 |
|
> What a job this Russell fellow has done for the Tribe. Just don't
> understand why the Red Sox let him go...must have something to do
> with the team chemistry. What do ya think?
I think you're heading for a big and painful fall, pal. Any reasonably
sane Indians fan (like Joe Huber) should have a bit more trepidation
and humility than to be pushing all his chips across the table on this
turd. After all his yapping about Red Sox "cancers", our friend Chappy
learned the hard way, and very quickly, about Russell's chemistry lab
partner in crime, Greg Harris. Your turn awaits, my friend... ;-)
Fact of it is, I'm quite happy to have gotten Chris Nabholz for
Russell, as I've always liked Nabholz (commended the Indians for
picking him up in the first place), and if he rebounds from some
elbow problems he can be a very nice young lefthanded starter.
Thanks for the Nabholz two-hitter the other night, Chief. Lemme
know the next time Jack Morris throws one a those...
glenn
|
63.311 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Wed Jul 20 1994 10:55 | 25 |
| Chainsaw sez:
>Well, I don't know the physics of it all, but a corked bat will be lighter,
>giving you more bat speed. There's got to be a limit to how light a
>big bat can be (ie, if it's 34", it cannot physically weigh under a certain
>amount, because of the amount of wood it must contain). If you cork it,
>you get the same dimensions, with much less weight.
>Then too, I wonder if changing the structure of the bat from a solid to
>what is effectively a cylinder filled with a lighter material might give
>more "pop" to the ball as it comes off the bat.
The was an article in today's Worcester T&G about the advantages of
'corking' a bat. Including the points 'Saw makes above, after the
cork is inserted into the bat it expands. The expanded cork exerts
pressure on the surrounding wood, making the wood more dense and thus
giving the ball a little more pop off the bat.
The expert in the article (from Louisville Slugger) said cork will give
you about an extra 10 feet on a fly ball. The goal is to turn 370 foot
fly-outs into 380 'cheap' homeruns. Its not going to make a weak hitter
capable of 500+ foot shots....
Jim
|
63.312 | | CAMONE::WAY | Come to Butt-head | Wed Jul 20 1994 10:56 | 16 |
| >
> I think you're heading for a big and painful fall, pal. Any reasonably
> sane Indians fan (like Joe Huber) should have a bit more trepidation
> and humility than to be pushing all his chips across the table on this
> turd. After all his yapping about Red Sox "cancers", our friend Chappy
> learned the hard way, and very quickly, about Russell's chemistry lab
> partner in crime, Greg Harris. Your turn awaits, my friend... ;-)
>
IMO, this paragraph is one of the most outstanding paragraphs I've seen
since I've been reading SPORTS....
Just had to say it.
|
63.313 | Did I say I liked Harris Glen????????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Jul 20 1994 11:18 | 8 |
|
Don't move to fast Glen. You don't want to break Saw's nose off in
your Butt! :-)
Chappy
|
63.314 | | CAMONE::WAY | Come to Butt-head | Wed Jul 20 1994 11:48 | 14 |
| > -< Did I say I liked Harris Glen????????? >-
>
>
>
> Don't move to fast Glen. You don't want to break Saw's nose off in
> your Butt! :-)
Hey, I can just appreciate a witty turn of phrase, and Glenn certainly
did that in that paragraph.
He's still on my sh*t list for his crack about my main Jurgen Klinsmann
though 8^)
|
63.315 | It was just your perfect timing, Chap... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Il Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo! | Wed Jul 20 1994 11:58 | 16 |
|
> -< Did I say I liked Harris Glen????????? >-
No, but it was absolutely beautiful how within a week of your "everyone
who leaves Boston is a cancer" speech, Harris flamed out in New York
under a hailstorm of dissension with his manager. Harris came in
whining about misuse and Buck Showalter's response was "I don't want
to hear any of that crap". Two shellackings later, Harris and his
'tude were gone. How come everyone Buck doesn't like is branded a
cancer in New York?
If the Red Sox can just continue to strategically place these Trojan
Horses around the league, they just may get somewhere...
glenn
|
63.316 | We don't need no stinkin Butt Monkeys...... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Jul 20 1994 12:00 | 8 |
|
Oh Thanks for clarifying that for me Glen.
Chap
|
63.317 | | CAMONE::WAY | Come to Butt-head | Wed Jul 20 1994 12:10 | 6 |
| > -< We don't need no stinkin Butt Monkeys...... >-
Interesting choice of words considering all the problems the Yanks are
having referencing primates these days.....
|
63.318 | Nominate Chappy for Yankee Director of Media Relations! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Il Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo! | Wed Jul 20 1994 12:16 | 1 |
|
|
63.319 | Bagwell??? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Jul 20 1994 13:00 | 5 |
| refresh my memory Sox fans
Didn't Bagwell use to play for Boston??
|
63.320 | Are you trying to be funny????????? | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Wed Jul 20 1994 13:05 | 5 |
|
No Jeff Bagwell NEVER played for the Boston Red Sox.
Jerry
|
63.321 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Jul 20 1994 13:16 | 40 |
|
A few quick back-from-brief-vacation thoughts...
1) Assuming it really was Belle's bat, or Belle knew it was corked,
this has to rate (as Glenn noted) as one of the stupidest stunts
of the year. Thankfully, the loss of Belle for 10 games shouldn't
make a huge difference (a game or less).
2) It now seems certain that Baerga will reach double digits in
walks. If he could make that _triple_ digits, he'd be an MVP
candidate; OTOH, he's doing wonders for his eventual HOF
chances by getting every hit possible...
3) Other than Baerga and Alomar, the batters are slumping (or at
least were until last night). I think it's mainly Chicago
pitching that's the problem...
4) Hargrove's clearly worried about a strike; otherwise, Ramirez
wouldn't be sitting down so often for the immortal Wayne Kirby.
5) I'm not going to argue too much with Russell if he can at least
act like a closer for now. The downside to the trade (losing
Nabholz) wasn't huge, though it seems most Indians fans totally
dismiss Nabholz, who I think can pitch.
6) There is no #6.
7) If Hargrove allows Grimsley to throw 130 pitches again this year
he should be shot. OK, maybe just winged with a boomerang, but
hopefully he's learned his lesson.
8) Eddie Murray is now 6 for 8 in stolen base attempts.
9) If Alomar can finish the season healthy, it will be a great
season for him, even given the general offensive increase
around the league. I'm really curious, though, why he's
hitting over 100 points better (.306 vs. .175) versus
_righties_.
Joe
|
63.322 | ah yes, the box score we've been waiting for... | SALEM::DODA | Workin' on mysteries without any clues | Thu Jul 21 1994 00:40 | 4 |
| I damn near wet my pants watching Jeff do it to someone else for
a change.
daryll
|
63.323 | Or maybe it was Hargroves terrible use of the 'pen | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Thu Jul 21 1994 08:17 | 9 |
|
Hal/Chief.....
How'bout that Jeff Russell game on the line pressure situation whoa
whata pick up. Headline in the Plain Dealer (I think thats the one)
will read "Russell not able to concentrate cat has flu".
Jerry
|
63.324 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Jul 21 1994 09:33 | 25 |
|
> -< Or maybe it was Hargroves terrible use of the 'pen >-
Huh? I can argue with some moves, but the use of the pen wasn't
bad (if, as Hargrove has to, you assume Russell is a real closer).
BTW, wasn't Russell's demise supposed to be a bit farther off? B^(
The one move I really have trouble with was _not_ having Murray
sac bunt in the 11th.
Now, I hate the sac bunt 99% of the time - it's a one run strategy,
and one run strategies invariably decrease the number of total
expected runs by giving up outs. But in the 11th inning of a tie
game at home, with the leadoff runner on base and two very hot
players following... doesn't this scream sac bunt?
Highlight for the Indians: Derek Lilliquist remembers how to pitch.
Lowlight: Mark Clark out 4-6.
Hopefully one of (Ogea, Tavarez, Lopez) will finally be given a real
shot, rather than sending out Mesa or something...
Joe
|
63.325 | left off the :*) | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Thu Jul 21 1994 09:58 | 8 |
|
Joe...
I was just making excuses that Russell will use for his shortcommings.
No dig at Hargrove intended.
Jerry
|
63.326 | | CAMONE::WAY | Come to Butt-head | Thu Jul 21 1994 10:05 | 8 |
| Russell's demise comes anytime there's a pressure save situation, whether
it's opening day or what.
All of the little stats that Hal has been posting go right out the window,
mainly because of Russell blowing it last night.....
'Saw
|
63.327 | HalWatch, Day 1 | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Il Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo! | Thu Jul 21 1994 10:21 | 11 |
|
A very low-pressure _easy_ save situation too, I might add. I also
flipped the game over at 11 PM just in time to catch the main event.
Russell was fortunate not to have given up 6 runs, much less 3, but
he still got the job done as far as the Rangers were concerned. It's
the same Jeff Russell I saw with the Sox: wild, no control of his
breaking pitches, forced to bring in the meat. Gawd, that didn't take
long at all, did it?
glenn
|
63.328 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Jul 21 1994 10:37 | 4 |
|
No, not nearly as long as I'd hoped... B^(
Joe
|
63.329 | Normally sequels aren't as good as the original, but... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Il Divino! Roberto Bag-gi-ooooo! | Thu Jul 21 1994 10:42 | 9 |
|
> No, not nearly as long as I'd hoped... B^(
Better now than in the World Series, as happened with Trojan Horse I,
Jeff Reardon. The Yankees got rid of Trojan Horse II a bit too quickly
for my tastes and now we're down to everyone's favorite human being...
glenn
|
63.330 | Look for Indians' bubble to burst | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Jul 21 1994 10:51 | 5 |
| Matt Clark(11-3) suffered a broken wrist and is out 4-6 weeks. The
Indians,last night,again proved that no lead is safe with their bullpen
and blew several big leads on the was to a 13-11 11 inning loss.
The White Sox are poised to blow things open this weekend.
|
63.331 | Sorry Saps!!!!!!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Thu Jul 21 1994 11:10 | 8 |
|
Seeing you Sox fans are so quickly to mention Jeff Russell's night
last night. How did your saviour Nabholz due last night Huh?
Chappy
|
63.332 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Jul 21 1994 11:13 | 28 |
|
> -< Look for Indians' bubble to burst >-
How so? There's nothing, save Clark's injury which _might_ be
offset by the callup of one of the kids, that indicates that
the Tribe is anything other than what they appear to be - one of
the top four teams in the AL this year, though not quite as good
as Chicago.
> Indians,last night,again proved that no lead is safe with their bullpen
> and blew several big leads on the was to a 13-11 11 inning loss.
Actually, the bullpen took one big step _forward_ last night,
as Lilliquist was in '92-'93 form. Mesa and Plunk were fair at
best. Only Russell was truly bad; Casian only threw two really
bad pitches (the HR by Gonzalez and FO by Palmer). Overall, I
was somewhat encouraged by the performance of the non-Russell
bullpen.
> The White Sox are poised to blow things open this weekend.
Could happen. I think a split is most likely, but that hurts the
Tribe. If they can win 3 of 4, they're tied; a sweep and they're
in good shape.
Go Tribe!
Joe
|
63.333 | He got hammered I quess but would rather have him than Russell | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Thu Jul 21 1994 12:51 | 8 |
|
Hey Chappy...
No Red Sox fan I know of called Nabholtz a savoir. A 5th starter
yes, savior hardly.
Jerry
|
63.334 | Russells 94 problems mostly mental | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jul 21 1994 13:20 | 13 |
| Unlike say Lee Smith who is consistent but never exceptional, Russell
can be both very good and very bad. He had an excellent season for sox
last year until arm injuries cut the season short. He also had an
incentive contract.
This year he's been very insonsistent until just before being traded
when it looked like he finally came around. He voiced frustrations
which I'm inclined to believe are more prevalent on sox (vs duquette)
than some want to believe (non whitefield clique of globe sports fe.)
Considering the market the indians made an excellent deal and I wish
them well in there attempts to beat out Orioles for the wildcard spot
(but don't count the jays out completely).
|
63.335 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Rock Lobster | Thu Jul 21 1994 13:30 | 4 |
| So has Russell instructed the Cleveland front office to take
chemistry lessons yet?
/Don
|
63.336 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jul 21 1994 15:15 | 7 |
| > -< Look for Indians' bubble to burst >-
About a month ago I mentioned that the Indians pitching staff looks like
one that will have a hard time maintaining a good level of performance
through 162 games. I think they will have to out-score people (it may
be happening already) to keep winning, and the bullpen may get burned
out. They look like a late-80s Yankees team.
|
63.337 | Hargrove retained | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Mon Jul 25 1994 14:19 | 4 |
|
The Indians will hold a press conference this afternoon to announce a
contract extension for Mr. Hargrove. No surprise here... I didn't
hear any details as to bucks or duration.
|
63.338 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Jul 26 1994 10:36 | 29 |
|
Hargrove's been signed through '96.
On the Cleveland Sports Mailing List, I did a quick little review
of Hargrove as a manager, focusing on what I consider to be the
most important aspects of managing - player development and team
building. (As a game day manager, I'm mixed on Hargrove - he was
smart enough to have Plunk pitch to Frank Thomas in a critical
situation this weekend (Thomas is 0-for-13 lifetime vs. Plunk),
and doesn't give up intentional walks or overuse one run strategies,
but some of his handling of pitchers really irritates me.)
It's hard to judge the team building front impartiality, but to my
eyes it looks like Hargrove has done a wonderful job - there is
a sense of being a team in player quotes that I've never seen among
the Indians before, despite the adversities the team has faced.
As far as player development goes though - wow. Since Hargrove
took over, he's turned the following players into regulars:
Alomar, Belle, Baerga, Thome, Ramirez, Kirby, Sorrento, Whiten.
About the only talented player he hasn't managed to make a regular
is Mark Lewis.
The pitchers are much the same case - Nagy, Clark, Lilliquist, Plunk,
Olin, Mesa, and Grimsley have all become regulars under Hargrove.
I'm really glad to see that his contract's been extended.
Joe
|
63.339 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Fri Jul 29 1994 10:44 | 20 |
|
Re .330
> The White Sox are poised to blow things open this weekend.
They didn't, and now the Indians have moved back in front, even
with Baerga & Clark out...
I just realized this morning that the Indians have, realistically,
6 potential future HOF in their lineup - Murray's a lock; Belle,
Baerga, and Lofton all have nice starts, and Thome and Ramirez
have the potential (the Brock2 projection of Thome, for anyone
who's read Bill James, show him retiring with over 500 HR).
It's been an incredible season so far. The Tribe needs a good
series in NY - they really could use 2 wins - but the White Sox
have cooled off (finally) and the Tribe has a 4.5 game lead on
the Orioles now.
Joe
|
63.340 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jul 29 1994 11:28 | 16 |
| > the Tribe has a 4.5 game lead on the Orioles now.
This is the one to focus on (IMO) more than the White Sox. The way
I see it, winning the division isn't that important. The 1st-round
playoff format gives the division winner 3 home games in the 5-game
series. BUT, they're the last 3 games ! The baseball rulers claim
this is the home-field advantage. Tell that to the division winner(s)
who drops one or both of the first 2 games at the other team's park,
and goes back home needing to win 2 of 3, or sweep all 3.
The pennant race is happening now (through 8/12). If they come
back in Sept, anyone more then 5 games back is probably cooked,
especially if they don't play the team they're chasing. Hopefully
the whole season doesn't get thrown out. It's nice to see Cleveland
in the hunt. Although I hope they continue to have problems with
the Yanks.
|
63.341 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Mon Aug 01 1994 08:50 | 7 |
|
Yanks own the tribe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Chap
|
63.342 | bums! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Aug 01 1994 11:27 | 7 |
|
for now..........
WaHooooooo!
the Chief
|
63.343 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Aug 01 1994 12:10 | 10 |
|
...and for no particularly good reason. B^(
Very disappointing series; the pitching was OK, but the hitting went
South. 1 run? Exceedingly impressive performance by Key.
Thankfully, the Indians only face the Yankees 3 or 4 more times this
year, and in Cleveland at that.
Joe
|
63.344 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Aug 01 1994 12:10 | 5 |
|
That is you hope the Yankees and Indians meet again this season.
The Crazy Met
|
63.345 | | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Mon Aug 01 1994 13:27 | 5 |
|
You really think Eddie Murray's a lock HOF? He has been a good player
for many years but I'm not sure as a HOF (especially a lock). I put
Murray in a class of great players (but not HOF) such as Garvey,
Parker, Rice, ....
|
63.346 | The scooter was a verry good SS but no | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Mon Aug 01 1994 13:44 | 21 |
|
I have to agree. But with the water'd down HOF now does it really
matter? Murray, Rice, Evans (both Dwight and Darrell) all had very
solid and in some cases Rice in '78, outstanding career's, but HOF
I wouldn't vote them in. They have let some below HOF'ers in but
its not like it has just started to happen it has been that way all
along. 6 years after Ripken retires he will most certianly go to
Cooperstown but really, does his numbers warrant it? The streak
included. Yea it is remarkable and truely a (in todays world of
sissy athletes) a superhuman feat but does that make him HOF material?
I don't think so and I'm sure I'm not alone. I stongly feel that
the streak should be in Cooperstown as in a special wing like the
no-no's perfect games, 20 K's ect but not with the Williams, Mantles
ect. If someone was a solid .250 hitter should they be in the Hall?
I say no but what it someone went 162 for 648 in one season. Not
a great year by anyone's standards but....what if they went 1 for 4
in every game. Breaking Joe D's hit streak does that make one
a Hall of Famer?
Jerry
|
63.347 | Ripken and Murray yes,Phil(?) | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Aug 01 1994 13:55 | 22 |
| You've got to be kidding about Ripken's HOF credentials. Even without
the streak,he's been the dominant shortstop in the AL the past 13
years. He's won 2 MVP's and has solid career stats.
Murray has a long career of consistency that has built into numbers far
superior to Rice and the Evans'. He's up around 460 HRs,2900 hits, and
1700 RBI's. Nobody with those numbers has ever not been in the HOF.
The HOF'er I may question,and this is unspoken around NY(pure heresy)
is Phil Rizzuto. We have been bombarded with two straight weeks of
"Don't look at his numbers,he was the glue on great Yankees team
etc",but what gets me is that he was eligible for 15 years and then has
been on the veterans committee for so many years.
Only when the Veterans Committee stacked the deck with good friends like
Yogi Berra,Bill White and Pee Wee Reese did he make it. I think one of
the big reasons he made it was his announcing career which kep his
"injustice" firmly in the public eye.
I guarantee if you called up a sports talk show with this viewpoint you
would get hung up on pretty quick. If I was in the NY media,I wouldn't
dare mention it either.
|
63.348 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Aug 01 1994 16:08 | 15 |
|
> You really think Eddie Murray's a lock HOF? He has been a good player
> for many years but I'm not sure as a HOF (especially a lock). I put
> Murray in a class of great players (but not HOF) such as Garvey,
> Parker, Rice, ....
Garvey in the same class as Murray? Only if you ignore the little things,
like walks and home runs...
Murray strikes me as easily the strongest candidate among (Murray,
Garvey, Parker, Rice), and I do think he'll go in without a problem
(the HR and RBI will look really nice, and the decent walk total won't
hurt).
Joe
|
63.349 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Aug 01 1994 17:02 | 8 |
|
Murray could probalby DH another year or 2 - yuck (about the DH part) - and
get to 3000 hits and incerdibly close to or past 500 HR. Those are automatic
qualifiers for HoF unless the criteria that seem to be used are radically
changed.
The Crazy Met
|
63.350 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Aug 03 1994 17:34 | 18 |
| > Only when the Veterans Committee stacked the deck with good friends like
> Yogi Berra,Bill White and Pee Wee Reese did he make it. I think one of
> the big reasons he made it was his announcing career which kep his
> "injustice" firmly in the public eye.
The biggest reason for Phil Rizzuto being in the HoF is Pee Wee Reese.
Once he got in, Rizzuto had to be elected. Former players say they
were the best SS's in MLB at that time (defense is part of the game, a
part nearly everyone forgets). Ted Williams says Rizzuto was the best
SS he ever saw.
I never saw the guy play, but he played with a team full of HoFs
and STILL won the AL MVP award. That alone tells me he wasn't some
average player.
Being a Yankee fan I've always taken Rizzuto-bashers as really doing
Yankee-bashing more than anything else. Maybe that's why it took so
long for him to get his just reward.
|
63.351 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Aug 03 1994 17:52 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 63.350 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>Being a Yankee fan I've always taken Rizzuto-bashers as really doing
>Yankee-bashing more than anything else. Maybe that's why it took so
>long for him to get his just reward.
It's also announcer bashing. In basketball Bob Cosy had a lot more respect
before he started announcing games.
Also, wasn't Rizzuto the one who did some really obnoxious and sleazy
commercials for some sort of furniture company? That sort of thing wouldn't
help.
George
|
63.352 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is two years old!! | Wed Aug 03 1994 18:15 | 5 |
| Yea, the only bashing of the Scooter from this corner is as an announcer. The
few clips I saw of him as a ballplayer, he was pretty slick. As an announcer,
he's the worst I've heard since Johnny Most.
=Bob=
|
63.353 | Cheapening the Hall | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Aug 05 1994 00:40 | 15 |
| =Bob=:
Rizzuto has definitely regressed in recent years. He's a pain to listen
to even if you live near him and know what he's talking about. From
1956 to about the early 80's he was a decent announcer.
Joe:
I don't deny that he was probably deserving compared to many they have
let in in recent years. It just leaves a bad taste in my mouth to see
someone get so many chances and only when the deck is totally stacked
does he get in.
Now Scotter is trying to get Richie Ashburn,Nellie Fox and some other
contemporaries in. Cheapens the Hall of Fame,IMO.
|
63.354 | | STRATA::RPETERSON | | Fri Aug 05 1994 16:00 | 6 |
| I guess you'd have to see those guys play to appretiate them being in
the HOF. As far as the gripes against the Scooter I think that if guys
like Ted Williams say he's the best SS he's ever seen then you can be
pretty sure he deserves to be there. It's the Hall of Fame and the
scooter is famous for being a great SS.
|
63.355 | What about Marty Marion? | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Sun Aug 07 1994 08:50 | 7 |
| On this subject, check out Bill James' recent book, _The_Politics_of_Glory_.
In addition to a history of the Hall and its selection processes (and the
repeated cheapening of membership by the Veterans' Committee), he attempts
to analyze the de facto criteria for membership and to rate current and
potential future members according to those criteria. Highly recommended.
Steve
|
63.356 | Active Hall of Famers | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Aug 08 1994 10:07 | 26 |
| IMO the active eligible (> 10 years) most likely HOF'ers:
1) Cal Ripken- Even without the streak,two MVP's and great numbers for
a shortstop. The streak makes him one-of-a-kind.
2) Dave Winfield - 3000 hits and almost 500 HR's
3) Dennis Eckersley- the best releiver in last 10 years and a fine
starter for first 10 years.
4) Tony Gwynn-The best hitter in the last 20 years
5) Wade Boggs-The second best hitter in the last 20 years
6) Ricky Henderson-Best base stealer and leadoff hitter ever.
7) Ozzie Smith-maybe the best at his position ever
8) Roger Clemens-The best pitcher of the last 10 years
9) Eddie Murray-never great,but he's going to wind up in the top 15 for
almost every major category.
10)Paul Molitor-His last few years nail down the HOF.
Borderliners: Don Mattingly,Joe Carter,Andre Dawson,Tim Raines,Jack
Morris,Kirby Puckett,Lou Whitaker,
Might have beens: Darryl Strawberry,Doc Gooden,Eric Davis
As long as they get 10 years they're in:
Barry Bonds,Frank Thomas,Ken Griffey jr,Greg Maddux,Jose Canseco
I'm certain I've missed some names but this was done quickly.
Glenn,fill in the errors.
|
63.357 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Aug 08 1994 11:27 | 11 |
|
Getting back to the Indians (and off the HoF rathole I started)...
Disappointing series against the Sox this weekend. I was at the
2nd game on Saturday, which was fun, though I would have liked to have
seen Thome. Ramirez's shot was beautiful to watch.
Down 1 game for the division, up 2 & 2.5 (KC and Baltimore,
respectively) for the wild card - it's been a great season so far...
Joe
|
63.358 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is two years old!! | Mon Aug 08 1994 11:30 | 6 |
| Yabut
I guess the Indians were glad to get Albert "Corky" Belle back. Dinger in
his firsted at-bat after his suspension - how about that!
=Bob=
|
63.359 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Aug 08 1994 11:39 | 8 |
|
Re .358
Decidely. Even a team w/ as much offensive power as the Indians
is going to be better when the 2nd best offensive player in the
league (3rd best overall) is back...
Joe
|
63.360 | Jeff Russell....an Indian | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Aug 09 1994 08:46 | 6 |
|
Ya gotta love Belle when he took those two foul balls and threw
them over the fence. HaHaHa.
WaHooooooo!
|
63.361 | | CAMONE::WAY | Try 664/668, Neighborhood of The Beast | Tue Aug 09 1994 09:51 | 9 |
| >
> Ya gotta love Belle when he took those two foul balls and threw
> them over the fence. HaHaHa.
>
> WaHooooooo!
>
Yeah, I know. It gave me a stiffie......
|
63.362 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Aug 09 1994 11:26 | 7 |
|
I _believe_ that the Indians have now clenched the if_the_players_and_
owners_refuse_to_move_an_inch_until_October wild card, and remain just
1 game behind Chicago. When Ruben Amaro is producing runs (but not
generally starting), you know the team's doing OK... B^)
Joe
|
63.363 | 1ST IN MY LIFETIME | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Aug 09 1994 15:42 | 18 |
|
Lets......
Celebrate
Celabrate
Selabrate
selebrate
Sellebrate
Sellabrate
Cellabrate
Ahhhh forget it. Lets have a beer! or two or three...
WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
|
63.364 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Conjunction jct, what's yo function? | Tue Aug 09 1994 16:51 | 2 |
| Keep beating that drum...
|
63.365 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Aug 10 1994 09:40 | 18 |
|
Good news first:
The Indians released Jack Morris yesterday. I have to say, he had more
left than I thought. He still stunk 75% of the time, though, and
given his recent habit of heading to Montana between starts, the
move makes a lot of sense. This provides another opportunity for a
young starter (probably Ogea) to gain a foothold in the majors.
Also, Chicago lost.
And the bad news:
The Tribe was trounced by the Blue Jays last night. DiPoto and
Casian were awful; Stottlemyre wasn't much better, but _was_
better.
Joe
|
63.366 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is two years old!! | Wed Aug 10 1994 10:28 | 13 |
| Timing seems funny on the Morris release, but I guess there are several factors:
1. He is approaching a_innings pitched bonus in his contract.
2. He apparently was spending more effort on his farm in {mumble-mumble} than
on the ballclub. Of course this may have been on of those sour-grapes
things that ball clubs sometimes do. Kinda a_"addition by subtraction"
thing.
I suspect that at 39, and with a big contract, Morris will now have plenty of
time to spend on the farm.
=Bob=
|
63.367 | Bye Jack | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Aug 10 1994 10:53 | 10 |
| Jack Morris was one of baseball's best pitchers in the 80's. He had a
fabulous world series for Minnesota in 1991. His game 7 performance
clinched his place in baseball lore.
His behavior since then could be used as an exhibit in the public's
case against spoiled baseball players. Remember how emotional he was
after the 1991 WS? "All I ever wanted to do was play for Minnesota.
This is my home" ... And then two months later,taking Toronto's money..
Unfortunately,there are a lot of Jack Morris types running around.
|
63.368 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Aug 10 1994 10:58 | 14 |
|
> Of course this may have been on of those sour-grapes things that ball
> clubs sometimes do. Kinda a_"addition by subtraction" thing.
"Sour-grapes"? If he was pitching in his '91 form, or even '92 form,
I don't think the question of realeasing him would have ever come up.
But he wasn't; with the exception of a half dozen starts, he's
been horrendous this season, and the Indians have a _lot_ of pitchers
who they're going to have to give a chance to sink-or-swim in the
majors in the next year and a half. (Certainly Ogea, Tavarez, Mlicki,
and Lopez; possibly Kirkreit, Carter, Lynch, Crawford, Byrd, and
others....)
Joe
|
63.369 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Hookin' up words & phrases & clauses | Wed Aug 10 1994 11:01 | 3 |
| Morris was like that before he left Detroit. That's why they didn't
make an effort to resign him before he went to Minnesota...
|
63.370 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is two years old!! | Wed Aug 10 1994 11:15 | 9 |
| Yabut you have to at least consider that the Indian's major decision point here
was not his attitude, but the combination of that an the money he was about to
get. I wouldn't be surprised if they had planned this all along - unless he
was doing remarkably well, they would release him once he approached his
"innings bonus". This is what the Red Sox did with Greg Harris.
Also, what David said...
=Bob=
|
63.371 | sounds like Indians did Jack a favor | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Aug 10 1994 11:19 | 10 |
| Doesn't this pay Morris regardless of strike wheras he would not be
paid during strike.
He not only carried Detroit and won a world series for Minny but he was
invaluable to Toronto. He was perfect example of a guy who returned on
the investment.
And Indians are doing pretty well with Jack, wonder how they'd have
done without him. Pena was a great move for the tribe and a very
stupid release by the sox.
|
63.372 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Aug 10 1994 11:24 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 63.367 by OPTION::LAZARUS "David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353" >>>
> His behavior since then could be used as an exhibit in the public's
> case against spoiled baseball players. Remember how emotional he was
> after the 1991 WS? "All I ever wanted to do was play for Minnesota.
> This is my home" ... And then two months later,taking Toronto's money..
Well I wouldn't say it's the "public's case" against the players, more like
the radio call in crowd's case against the players. I'm part of the public
and I have no gripe against the players at all.
As a Red Sox fan I'd love to see a guy win game 7 of a World Series for the
Sox. From that point I wouldn't care where he went. At least we'd have a
championship.
George (1918 and waiting)
|
63.373 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Aug 10 1994 13:38 | 48 |
|
Re .370
If money was the main concern, why not just wait until after the
seemingly unavoidable strike? Morris already passed at least one
innings bonus - I believe the first one was at 90 innings - and
wasn't pitching all too well up to that point. I honestly don't
believe, if he were just showing 1992 form (which was below average,
but not unredeemable), they would have kept him on. He wasn't.
Re .371
Morris contract is not guarentee; the Indians will owe him no more
or less than they would if they'd kept him until the end of the
first game after Aug. 11.
And yes, the Indians were doing pretty well with Jack. They're
also doing pretty well with Alvaro Espinoza, but that doesn't mean
Espinoza's any good either.
The fact is, Morris is through. It appeared that way before the
year started; it seems quite clear now. He had a few good outings
this year, scattered among hoards of bad ones. The Indians have
a lot of young pitchers who, after working through their initial
adjustments to the major leagues, should be miles better than the
1994 Jack Morris.
And Pena was _not_ (IMHO) a stupid release by the Sox. The Sox aren't
going anywhere this year; they might as well play guys who will be
around when the team does have a chance to go somewhere. The
Indians have a chance to win this year; signed to a bargain contract,
it was felt that Pena could help more than Levis or Merullo (a bad
assumption, in my opinion, but one that had provided decent
results).
Morris' stats:
141.1 innings
163 hits (35 doubles, 4 triples, 14 HR)
67 walks
100 strikeouts
OBA against - .369
SLG against - .444
ERA against - 5.60
His numbers last year were even worse...
Joe
|
63.374 | As long as he won | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Aug 10 1994 14:45 | 6 |
| � As a Red Sox fan I'd love to see a guy win game 7 of a World Series for the
�Sox. From that point I wouldn't care where he went. At least we'd have a
�championship.
Well said,I agree with you. As a Ranger fan,I feel the same way about
Keenan. He brought a title and now he can do as he pleases.
|
63.375 | I know these ideas are not "current" | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Aug 10 1994 14:56 | 19 |
| joe,
I never see it reported and it appears not to be accepted by
current gms today like it was 'in my day' but I still observe that
successful teams start with the catcher, then a dependable 2nd baseman
and finally a centerfielder with range.
I would add "lefthanded defensively skilled first baseman". Exhibit
A: Don Mattingly the mvp on American League in terms value to
team/league standing. I cannot watch 10 minutes of yankee play without
him doing something that 90% of the rest cannot do.
But to the point: Indians seem to have the three prime ingredients
and the results show it. Pena is part of the catching team.
Marty Barrett was the single most critical factor to redsox success
from 86-90 and his loss is biggest factor to decline and Pena kept sox
in contention for two more years.
billthe
|
63.376 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Aug 10 1994 15:10 | 8 |
| > 2) Dave Winfield - 3000 hits and almost 500 HR's
> 9) Eddie Murray-never great,but he's going to wind up in the top 15 for
> almost every major category.
How do people feel about longevity as a significant factor in HoF
membership ? And the reverse side of that: players not getting
in because they didn't play long enough, but were clearly among
the best when they played ? (eg: our beloved Thurman Munson)
|
63.377 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Aug 10 1994 15:12 | 18 |
| I don't know if I can go along with the idea that teams rise and fall based
on their catcher, 2nd baseman and center fielder. Sure those are important
positions but they are not everything. Pitching is at least half the game.
I like the Bill James school of thought which bases everything on runs
created and runs prevented. To be successful a team has to win games which can
be predicted based on the runs they score and the runs they allow.
When you start looking at how runs are scored, power seems high in the list.
Total bases and on base precentage are important factors. When it comes to
preventing runs, hard throwing pitchers kill rallies with strikeouts more often
than you get saved by a double play.
Yes it's important to have strong defense up the middle but Marty Barret did
not make the Red Sox into a pennant winning team. Good pitching and lots of
offense by Boggs, Barret, Rice, and others resulted in all those wins.
George
|
63.378 | c in there someplace | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Aug 10 1994 15:17 | 10 |
| three that made it without longevity were dizzy dean,koufax and joltin
Joe DiMaggio, the latter missing three war years. George Sisler had a
shortened career also.
I'd prefer judging by best 10-12 years and I'd consider the factor of
how many years the player was in the top 5-7 of his peers such as
Orlando Cepeda.
I'm surprised more writers just don't simple consider "Fame" as a prime
requisite and vote im Mazeroski(sic).
|
63.379 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Back Where it All Began | Wed Aug 10 1994 15:32 | 7 |
|
> Well said,I agree with you. As a Ranger fan,I feel the same way about
> Keenan. He brought a title and now he can do as he pleases.
^^^^^^^
spelling? shouldn't it be bought?
;^)
|
63.380 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Aug 10 1994 15:58 | 5 |
| MikeC, if anything it is Neil Smith who bought the title - and thanks,
we'll take it.
The Crazy Met
|
63.381 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Hookin' up words & phrases & clauses | Wed Aug 10 1994 16:00 | 2 |
| tcm, I can't send you mail... got an alternate node?
|
63.382 | Molitor in the HoF ? | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Aug 11 1994 14:38 | 6 |
| > 10)Paul Molitor-His last few years nail down the HOF.
Dave,
A lot of people say this, but I'm not convinced. He has been hurt
so much in his career. Can you post his #s that put him in the HoF ?
|
63.383 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Aug 11 1994 14:42 | 8 |
|
Re Paul Molitor
I don't have the numbers handy, but Molitor is on pace for 3000 hits
now; he wasn't terribly close a few years back. Given his other
plusses, I think he's a decent bet.
Joe
|
63.384 | Why can't sox get players like that! (they don't want them) | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Aug 11 1994 14:44 | 1 |
| His run from second to home on a missed double play clinched it for me
|
63.385 | | CAMONE::WAY | Hueys are way cool...Sir | Mon Aug 15 1994 10:01 | 11 |
| >Yabut you have to at least consider that the Indian's major decision point here
=Bob=,
Am I to assume, for the record, that you've taken over proprietary use
of "Yabut" from Kev, now that he is gone?
Just curious,
'Saw
|
63.386 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Aug 15 1994 10:04 | 7 |
| Yabut in this age of "open" systems, I suspect that Kev would want his "yabut"
to become public domain, open to anyone who would like to use it.
I remain,
Keeping the spirit alive,
=Bob=
|
63.387 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Aug 23 1994 17:49 | 21 |
|
There's an interesting discussion going on on USENET suggesting
(and, for the record, the suggestion was not made by and Indians
fan, and is primarily being supported by an A's fan) that Lofton
should be the MVP this year, or if not loses to Thomas by an
eyelash.
The thrust of the argument is that while Thomas is 33 runs better
offensively, Lofton's defense, based on previous performance (the
numbers for this year won't be out until after the season), can
be expected to be 28 runs better defensively, and given (1) that
Lofton plays CF, a more important defensive position than 1B, and
(2) that Lofton is almost certainly better in all the things that
aren't measured in the 33 run offensive difference above (scoring
from 2nd on a single, and the like), Lofton is probably the
better overall player this year.
I wouldn't have thought so, really, but the argument (in full) is
fairly convincing...
Joe
|
63.388 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Baseball in 94? 95? :-( | Tue Aug 23 1994 17:54 | 8 |
| 1. Runs preserved is a statisitcal category that is not accepted by
everyone and different people calculate it differently.
2. The better player (whatever that means) in a given season does not
always win the MVP. See NL MVP 1988 as one example.
The Crazy Met
|
63.389 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Member of the Sloan Peterson FanClub | Wed Aug 24 1994 09:31 | 9 |
|
with the Skanmees in first you expect someone outside of NY to win it?
hahahaa.....
While I think an everyday player should win it, my opinion means squat..
Jimmy Keys all the way..........
mike
|
63.390 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Wed Aug 24 1994 10:16 | 6 |
|
Sunday's paper mentioned that Lofton was in the top 10 in 10
seperate categorys. He was second in total bases, which is
outstanding for a CF.
Ron
|
63.391 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Aug 24 1994 10:33 | 28 |
|
> 1. Runs preserved is a statisitcal category that is not accepted by
> everyone and different people calculate it differently.
Absolutely. The exact number doesn't really matter, though, so
long as it's agreed that (1) Lofton's defense, relative to a league
average CF, is better than Thomas's, relative to a league average
1B, and (2) CF defense is more important/more difficult than 1B
defense.
> 2. The better player (whatever that means) in a given season does not
> always win the MVP. See NL MVP 1988 as one example.
No doubt about that. Of course, arguing who _will_ win the MVP
is never as interesting as who _should_ win the MVP. B^) Take
the RBI leader, and you'll have the MVP 2/3 of the time...
As I said, it wasn't an argument I was expecting from a non-Indians
fan. Not having really spent time thinking about it, I was happy
w/ the idea of Belle as the Indian's MVP - after all, he's got a
higher OBP, and a ridiculously high SLG.
That the Indians would have two such fantastic players on the same
team in the same year is incredible; that they'd have three other
players performing at star levels as well...
Joe
|
63.392 | The real MVP, Jeff Bagwell | BIGQ::WEST | | Wed Aug 24 1994 10:35 | 12 |
|
reply .389
Mr C, little bitter about the Yankees, Jimmy Key should win the Cy, but
the Yanks play as a team so the MVP should go to the team if possible
no one there really stands alone like Lofton, Thomas, Griffey, etc...
But what do you know, Your a Red Sox fan........keep praying that the
strike continues, thats the only way they won't end up in the cellar..
/kevin *)
|
63.393 | Cone is teh Cy winner | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peat | Wed Aug 24 1994 10:38 | 5 |
| Mr W lets not forget David Cone..as of right now he's the front runner
for Cy Young.......he's got Ke yuin every category...IP,K's,ERA,SO
Roger
|
63.394 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Aug 24 1994 14:14 | 7 |
|
How about wins and where his team will finish?????????
Chap
|
63.395 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Aug 24 1994 14:47 | 21 |
|
Re .394
Pitcher's wins are essentially a worthless category for comparing
pithcers, because they are heavily dependent upon how well the
team a pitcher throws for hits when he pitches. Jack Morris won
10 games for the Indians this year; however, that doesn't mean he
pitched well - he didn't, by a long shot - it means that the Indians
scored so many runs for him (an average of over 6.5 a game) that
the team won those 10 games he got credit for, often in spite of
his pitching performance.
And where Key's team will finish is largely irrelevant to whether
I'd vote for him for the Cy Young award. If I had two equal
pitchers, it might be the deciding factor, but that's about it.
Would you vote for Hill over Maddux? I mean, Hill is on the best
team in baseball currently, while Maddux is on a team fighting to
make the playoffs...
Joe
|
63.396 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Aug 24 1994 16:51 | 14 |
|
One more "more interesting than the strike" thought...
Cleveland's outfield this year had to be one of the best ever
offensively in a single season...
Belle - .437 OBP, .714 SLG
Lofton - .415 OBP, .536 SLG
Ramirez - .361 OBP, .521 SLG
Given their ages, they certainly have a chance to earn the distinction
of being the best outfield ever over the next few years.
Joe
|
63.397 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Aug 25 1994 11:07 | 18 |
|
Great to see a team do something nice for a player...
The Indians released Matt Turner yesterday. Turner had been
diagnosed with Hodgkin's disease early in the season, and was
still undergoing chemo when the strike began. On top of that,
his wife is pregnant. But since the players are on strike,
he wasn't being paid.
By releasing him, the Indians are now obligated to pay his
salary through the end of the season. When the strike ends,
the club will resign him to a 1995 contract (he wouldn't have
pitched again this year anyway).
Really nice to see - the only possible benefit for the Indians
is PR, whereas for Turner this has to be a big lift.
Joe
|
63.398 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Thu Aug 25 1994 11:32 | 9 |
| My daughters met Matt last year when he pitched for the marlins and
they both became Matt Turner fans (as did I). I hopr he's doing better
with his treatment. He was a class act to my kids, which is something I
haven't seen a whole lot of in big league players. Do you think it
would be possible to get a letter or card through to Turner by way of
the Indians?
Dennis Faust
|
63.399 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Aug 25 1994 11:57 | 9 |
|
> Do you think it would be possible to get a letter or card through
> to Turner by way of the Indians?
I strongly suspect so. Everything I've heard says that they do
intend to resign him as soon as they can do so and still pay him,
so they undoubtedly have kept some way to contact him.
Joe
|
63.400 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Aug 25 1994 13:12 | 8 |
| > Belle - .437 OBP, .714 SLG
> Lofton - .415 OBP, .536 SLG
> Ramirez - .361 OBP, .521 SLG
>
> Given their ages, they certainly have a chance to earn the distinction
> of being the best outfield ever over the next few years.
Joe, please.... best OF ever ?
|
63.401 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Aug 25 1994 13:13 | 5 |
| > -< Cone is teh Cy winner >-
Sorry, given the Cy Young IS the pitchers' MVP award, W-L and where
his team finishes DOES mean something. Key is presently the favorite
for the award.
|
63.402 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Aug 25 1994 13:37 | 20 |
|
>> Belle - .437 OBP, .714 SLG
>> Lofton - .415 OBP, .536 SLG
>> Ramirez - .361 OBP, .521 SLG
>>
>> Given their ages, they certainly have a chance to earn the distinction
>> of being the best outfield ever over the next few years.
>Joe, please.... best OF ever ?
Yes, best OF ever. They aren't _now_, but with typical development
Ramirez will be pushing .400 OBP, .600 SLG in a less offensively
based year - and that plus Lofton & Belle means _no_ holes - and
the problem with finding the best OF is often finding a good-or-
better third outfielder.
How many OF can you name where the low OBP was .361, and the low
SLG was .521?
Joe
|
63.403 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Aug 25 1994 14:08 | 72 |
|
> Sorry, given the Cy Young IS the pitchers' MVP award, W-L and where
> his team finishes DOES mean something. Key is presently the favorite
> for the award.
No, W-L record is fairly meaningless. Unless you believe that a
pitcher can make his teammates score more runs...
Good clue that W-L is meaningless - nearly every statistic in baseball
for a given year is most closely related to the previous year's
performance. For example, to predict a player's batting average, the
best piece of data was his batting average the previous year. However,
for W-L records, that's not the case. The best predictor for W-L
record is the previous year's ERA.
I'm willing to accept team W-L record as a differentiator, as I
said.
I guess the problem here is that I believe that the Cy Young should
go to the _best_ pitcher, as determined by matters for which the
pitcher has control (ERA, SLG allowed, OBP allowed, and so on); you
apparently don't. Key's a fine pitcher, and worthy of consideration;
Cone, on the Yankees (and with Key's run support) would have a better
record - why penalize him for pitching on a less good team?
Stats...
Key - 17-3, 3.19 ERA, 161 IP, .370 SLG vs., .326 OBA vs.
That's great - a wonderful season, by any measure. But good enough
for a 17-3 record? Only when you see...
Run Support - 6.92 runs/game.
Wow. With 7 runs of support per game, and only 3.5 allowed - no
wonder he's won 17.
Now to...
Cone - 16-5, 2.94 ERA, .332 SLG vs. .277 OBA vs.
That's incredible. He's one win short of Key - despite only
receiving 4.91 runs of support per game. Two whole runs/game
less than Key.
Another comparison...
The average hitter facing Key has a .370 SLG, and .326 OBA. What
kind of hitter is that?
Tim Hulett - Wes Chaberlain - Jim Edmonds - Ozzie Guillen - Lance
Johnson - Chris Gomez - Greg Gagne - John Jaha - Jeff Reboulet -
Pat Kelly - Rich Amaral - Felix Fermin - Dick Schofield
An OK mix of players. Essentially the whole group should be back
to play again next year, except maybe Hulett & Amaral. No stars,
but you wouldn't mind filling a hole with a Johnson or Edmonds.
The average hitter facing Cone has a .332 SLG, .277 OBA. What
kind of hitter is that?
Mike Devereaux - Scott Fletcher - JT Snow - Damion Easley - Gary
DiSarcina - Vince Coleman - Doug Strange - Ed Sprague Jr.
Other than Snow (who might still be young enough to snap out of
it) and Easley (who did put up better numbers last year), this
group is in trouble. Devereaux's fallen apart this year, and
Coleman's average is quickly approaching the Mendoza line.
Other than possibly Sprague, none of these guys hold a sure job
for next year.
Joe
|
63.404 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Baseball in 94? 95? :-( | Thu Aug 25 1994 14:29 | 6 |
| Joe, a better example of how misleading W-L is would be a comparison
between Jack McDowell and David Cone for 1993. I don't have the
stats but if you do take a look at them.
The Crazy Met
|
63.405 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Aug 25 1994 14:42 | 22 |
|
> Joe, a better example of how misleading W-L is would be a comparison
> between Jack McDowell and David Cone for 1993. I don't have the
> stats but if you do take a look at them.
Here goes...
Cone - 11-14, 3.33 ERA, .343 SLG vs., .312 OBA vs.
McDowell - 22-10, 3.37 ERA, .379 SLG vs. .314 OBA vs.
In this case, however, I would have voted for McDowell. Why?
Because they're very similar in the most important category (ERA),
and McDowell pitched for a team that won the AL West. A
good example of a case where team's performance would make a
difference for me.
Of course, it wouldn't have mattered, since I would have voted
for Key (18-6, 3.00 ERA, .382 SLG vs., .279 OBA vs.) over either
of them...
Joe
|
63.406 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Baseball in 94? 95? :-( | Thu Aug 25 1994 16:14 | 4 |
| what was the run support per game for those 3??
The Crazy Met
|
63.407 | how 'bout Bonds, Bonilla and Van Slyke | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Thu Aug 25 1994 17:10 | 6 |
| >> How many OF can you name where the low OBP was .361, and the low
>> SLG was .521?
I'm not sure but check out the OBP and SLG of the 1990 and
1991 Pirates with Bonds, Bonilla and Van Slyke
|
63.408 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Aug 25 1994 17:22 | 13 |
|
Re '93 run support...
Cone - 2.97
Key - 5.79
McDowell - 4.88
Re '90-'91 Pirate outfield
I could be wrong, but I don't believe Van Slyke has ever had a SLG
over .500.
Joe
|
63.409 | Rice,Lynn, Evans 1975-1980 | 25022::BREEN | When are ya com'n back?...can't cha hear me | Thu Aug 25 1994 17:38 | 1 |
|
|
63.410 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Aug 25 1994 17:53 | 11 |
|
Yes, Rice, Lynn, and Evans comprise an outfield to shoot for to be
considered the best ever. The Yankee outfield of the late 20's is
another one of particular note.
As I said, though, the Cleveland outfield has a _chance_ to be the
best ever. They aren't there yet, and lots of things would have to
go right for them to earn that distinction, but they certainly
have the possibility...
Joe
|
63.411 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Aug 25 1994 18:18 | 6 |
| The subject was CY YOUNG winners !!!!!! W-L and where your team finishes
ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY makes a difference in who is selected for the
Cy Young award. YOU can look it up.
I'm not arguing about the merits of W-L as a general indicator of pitching
performance.
|
63.412 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Baseball in 94? 95? :-( | Thu Aug 25 1994 22:09 | 10 |
| re: .411
where the team finishes does make a difference, no question about it.
it is not the determining factor but could tip the balance if it is a
close call. Carlton '72, Seaver '75, Jones '76, Jenkins in ??,
Gooden '85 all won Cy Young and were not on 1st place teams. There are
others as well.
The Crazy Met
|
63.413 | Likely winner != deserving winner | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Aug 26 1994 09:55 | 10 |
| Unfortunately, the Cy Young voters almost always overrate the W-L
numbers in making their decision, just as the MVP voters overrate
RBI. I have to agree with Joe: at this moment, David Cone is a
clear winner on my ballot; last year, I too would have voted for
Jimmy Key. I'm resigned to Key winning this year.
I suppose it's unrealistic to look for any sort of mathematical or
statistical literacy in a sportswriter.
Steve
|
63.414 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Aug 29 1994 11:07 | 19 |
|
Re .411
> The subject was CY YOUNG winners !!!!!! W-L and where your team finishes
> ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY makes a difference in who is selected for the
> Cy Young award. YOU can look it up.
And I wasn't arguing that it doesn't make a difference as to who wins
the award - I agree with you completely on that front, it does. All
I was arguing was that, if I were voting, I wouldn't look at it.
> I'm not arguing about the merits of W-L as a general indicator of pitching
> performance.
And I'm not arguing about the fact the W-L tends to be the most
significant factor in detemining the Cy Young award.
So I guess we'll just have to agree to agree on that... B^)
|
63.415 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Baseball in 94? 95? :-( | Thu Sep 01 1994 16:40 | 6 |
| Indians must still think that the baseball season will eventually
continue. They traded with Minnesota for Dave Winfield in exchange for
a PTBNL.
The Crazy Met
|
63.416 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Oct 04 1994 09:59 | 15 |
|
Well, the Stats, Inc. simulated season ended with the Indians
finishing 94-68, and making the playoffs as the wild card.
Belle ends up three HR short of the triple crown, and the
Indians hit 247 HR - a new major league record (and one you
heard very little about them aiming at, when there wasn't any
reason to simulate the season). Belle's simulated season
looks incredible - .372 BA, .451 OBP, 52 HR, 153 RBI and .743 SLG.
Baerga hit 30 HR, Ramirez 26 (with a .275 average - I like it),
Thome 29, Murray 23 (with a .246 average - I don't like it).
Nagy finishes 16-9, with a 3.37 ERA; Ogea is the only youngster to
come through (4-3, 4.80 ERA). The Tribe scores 927 runs, second
only to the Yankees (w/ over 1000).
Joe
|
63.417 | Didn't Yanks get over 300 HR's in '27 | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Tue Oct 04 1994 11:42 | 7 |
|
Are you sure 247 HR's would have been a new record? I thought
the '27 Yankee's had over 300 HR's?
Thanks,
Ron
|
63.418 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Oct 04 1994 11:58 | 5 |
|
No, I'm not sure, but it sounds right - the current record was given
as 240 by the 60 or 61 Yankees, and that sounds right.
Joe
|
63.419 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 04 1994 12:11 | 5 |
| yup 1961 Yankees have the record at 240. One of the Reds teams also had
something close to that back in the 1960's.
The Crazy Met
|
63.420 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Tue Oct 04 1994 13:20 | 3 |
| Only in Cleveland can someone get excited by a simulated season.
Mark.
|
63.421 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:00 | 7 |
|
Excited? Nah...
What the Indians, and Albert Belle, were doing was exciting.
The simulated season is mildly interesting.
Joe
|
63.422 | Just like the movies | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:52 | 6 |
|
I'm excited!!! Can't wait for the simulated playoff.
The Chief...
WAHOOOOOOO
|
63.423 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:59 | 3 |
63.424 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:05 | 4 |
| | Contest - name your favorite invention since the Red Sox last won
| the world series.
the .357 Magnum
|
63.425 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:09 | 5 |
| This from the team that hasn't won since the year Truman beat Dewey.
Now there's a recent memory.
George
|
63.426 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:11 | 8 |
|
yabbut, HAL before anyone finalizes a p_name bet with you they better make
sure that you agree to note at least once a day during the week that
you are paying up. You do have a notorious habit of ducking out of ::sprots
when the going gets tough.
The Crazy Met
|
63.428 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I feeel so good... | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:31 | 2 |
| favorite invention... television, flourescent light? The 440 cubic
inch engine...
|
63.429 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:31 | 4 |
| Cleveland -- City of Champions
NOT
|
63.430 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:41 | 7 |
| Actually the tribe has won twice since 1918. Of course they may have still
been the "Blues" when they won it back in 1920.
Oh well, Boston won the 1st one and they don't have the World Series any more
so what difference does it make anyway.
George
|
63.431 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Oct 04 1994 16:09 | 6 |
|
Ro .430
No, in 1920 they were the Indians.
Joe
|
63.432 | The next unseen key comes to mind | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Oct 04 1994 16:26 | 1 |
|
|
63.433 | Evan Goolagan (sp?) was the TEAM | PTOS02::SCHRAMME | The STONES are in town, the STONES are in town!! | Tue Oct 04 1994 17:22 | 20 |
|
>>> This from the team that hasn't won since the year Truman beat Dewey.
>>> Now there's a recent memory.
> Now now, George. The glory days of the mid '80s Celtics, the
> scintillating World Series of the '67 and '75 Red Sox, the
> Super Bowl appearance of the Pats and the continuous solid
> play of the Bruins all pale in comparison to the Cleveland
> Whogivesadamns winning the NASL championship. Yep, that'd
> be a real source of pride for any major league city but
> especially one with Cleveland's record for churning out
> winners year after year.
Same here in Pittsburgh. Of all the World Series, Stanley Cups and Super
Bowls Pittsburgh won during my lifetime (31 years), only the
championship of the Pittsburgh Golden Triangles (indoor tennis leauge
in the 70's) can be compared to the might achievmant Cleveland has made
winning the NASL.
|
63.434 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 05 1994 10:31 | 13 |
| RE NASL.
Less'e
National Athletic Scholastic League no
National Autdoor ...
National All Size Llll ...
National Aviation Sky Llll ...
Naval Aviation S... Lake ...
I give up.
George
|
63.435 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:15 | 24 |
63.436 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:26 | 18 |
| The reason I jumped back on the Patriots band wagon had more to do with the
owners than the players or the fact that they were winning.
I couldn't stand Pat Sullivan and Victor Kiam was even worse. Every time I
tried being a fan the owners would do something so sleazy I couldn't stand it.
They were always being sued by some employee, front office people fighting with
line backers, firing coaches during the playoffs, yuck!!! And then along came
Kiam and the Lisa Olson thing.
The new ownership is a breath of fresh air. I can be a fan of this team
regardless if they are winning or not. Of course if they are winning, so much
the better.
As for the Sox, I was born a Red Sox fan, I've lived all my life a Red Sox
fan, and I'll probably remain a Red Sox fan for life. That is, if they ever
play again.
George
|
63.437 | HTH | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:55 | 5 |
|
Face it both cities Sip!
|
63.438 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:18 | 3 |
63.439 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Oct 06 1994 09:21 | 6 |
|
Actually, I'm rather fond of Boston...
NY city, however, I could live quite well without...
Joe
|
63.440 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:49 | 15 |
|
Rumors from Cleveland:
Vizquel might not be resigned...
Lopez & Tavarez for Randy Johnson...
Larry Walker signed 1 day after strike ends...
Felix Fermin to be signed to fill in until Jackson's ready...
(OK, I made the bit about Walker up. The rest really have been
rumored.)
Joe
|
63.441 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Wed Nov 02 1994 07:43 | 9 |
63.442 | Where would they play him over Ramiez??? | AD::HEATH | No please not Kevin Kennedy | Wed Nov 02 1994 10:09 | 5 |
|
Joe give it up Walker is commin to Boston.
Jerry
|
63.443 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Wed Nov 02 1994 12:34 | 12 |
| > -< Where would they play him over Ramiez??? >-
Let one of (Walker, Belle, Ramirez) DH. OK, if Walker's healthy,
Ramirez has to DH usually (Belle does not like to DH, and doesn't
play very well when asked to DH).
It's a problem I wouldn't mind having...
Though keeping everyone happy, given the contract Walker would
require - that's a job I'd just as soon pass on.
Joe
|
63.444 | Da big Unit? | DECWET::BAKER | "Like a Rock." | Fri Nov 04 1994 10:52 | 9 |
| hmmmmm??
Re> Randy Johnson to Cleveland rumour.
In the Seattle area there is no word of this
But then again in Seattle, The M's treat us like mushrooms....
Keep us in the dark and sh*t all over us ;*)
|
63.445 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Fri Nov 25 1994 21:15 | 11 |
|
The Indians have acquired Burnitz & Roa from the Mets for three
pitching prospects (Mlicki, Byrd, and DiPoto) plus the infamous
PTBNL. I like the deal - Burnitz is a useful player in spite of his
low BA (which will undoubtedly be less low in Cleveland), and Roa is
younger than any of the trio of Tribe pitchers, with a similar
record of success.
Any thoughts TCM?
Joe
|
63.446 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:26 | 11 |
|
Peter Gammons must really enjoy driving Indians fans up the wall...
First, there's the Randy Johnson -for- Manny Ramirez and Julian
Tavarez rumor.
Now, there's the "Indians very interested in Andre Dawson" rumor...
Yuck.
Joe
|
63.447 | Maybe Willie Mays would be interested | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Dec 09 1994 08:32 | 7 |
| Just now saw .446 and I have to say the Andre Dawson part of it is
at least plausible. They went for Dave Winfield, didn't they?
On the other rumor: Joe, wouldn't you do Johnson for Ramirez and
Tavarez? If I were the Injuns, I sure would.
Steve
|
63.448 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 09 1994 11:01 | 6 |
63.449 | I see your point, Groaner | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Dec 09 1994 11:49 | 11 |
| I guess I'm having trouble adjusting to the 90s. All I was thinking about
were the 20 ballgames the big unit was going to win.
Offhand I don't know the state of Johnson's contract. I can't remember
having read about him signing recently, so maybe he'll be available on
the open market (whatever its nature turns out to be).
In any case, he can pitch for me any time. As long as I live, I will not
forget John Kruk batting against him in the 1993 All Star Game.
Steve
|
63.450 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 09 1994 13:26 | 6 |
63.451 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Mon Dec 12 1994 08:28 | 8 |
|
>On the other rumor: Joe, wouldn't you do Johnson for Ramirez and
>Tavarez? If I were the Injuns, I sure would.
Not a chance. I'd love to have Johnson, sure, but not for Ramirez.
Maybe for Tavarez.
Joe
|
63.452 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 15 1994 08:13 | 13 |
63.453 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 08:41 | 11 |
63.454 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:38 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 63.453 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "STEELERS Best in the AFC Central" >>>
> Indians > Red Sox
Not very likely. As it now sits, John Harrington is the lead negotiator
for the owners and Clemens seems to be one of the key players for the Union.
George
|
63.455 | "get a clue" | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:42 | 20 |
|
Re> Must be the officiating...naw, there wasn't any missed grabbing the
face mask calls....
The Browns were the better team on Sunday..NO doubt!
BUT....
Cavs> Celtics? Take a look up at the ceiling in the Gahden next time
your there!
Indians> There as pathetic as the Red Sox...no advantage
there....Atleast we make it to the World Series...When's the last time
the Clevescum Indians did?
Browns? Advantage here this year....but that is going to slip away
fast!!
No bandwagon jumper here!
|
63.456 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:47 | 5 |
| Problem is that the Indians are peaking right now while the Sox are an
up and coming team. By the time the regular players get back on the field,
the Indians may no longer be better than the Sox.
George
|
63.457 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:03 | 14 |
63.458 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:09 | 8 |
| > Problem is that the Indians are peaking right now while the Sox are an
>up and coming team. By the time the regular players get back on the field,
>the Indians may no longer be better than the Sox.
Interesting idea - why do you believe this? The core of the Tribe
is still mostly pre- or early- prime...
Joe
|
63.459 | You forgot the institution | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625 | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:37 | 11 |
|
> When you look real close, the Boston area has had the Celtics and
> that's about it... and now that the dynasty is over, they have nada.
The Bruin's have made the post season play EVERY YEAR since 1967.
During that time they have won 2 Stanley Cups, and have made it to the
finals on at least 3 other occasions. How's Clevescums hockey team
been doing???
RTG
|
63.460 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:19 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 63.457 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "STEELERS Best in the AFC Central" >>>
> Are we talking about ancient history or present. I'm talking about
> present. RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW THIS SEASON OR THE RECENTLY COMPLETED
> SEASON...
What recently completed season? No one completes seasons any more. Some
times they don't even start seasons.
> When you look real close, the Boston area has had the Celtics and
> that's about it... and now that the dynasty is over, they have nada.
By the time the real players return to the field, the Indians will have
peaked and the Red Sox will roll over them easily.
As for the Browns, they just managed to get away with their hide this time
but next year the Pats will grind them to a pulp.
George
|
63.461 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:20 | 12 |
| RE<<< Note 63.458 by ROCK::HUBER "Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions" >>>
> Interesting idea - why do you believe this? The core of the Tribe
> is still mostly pre- or early- prime...
You're taking my comments out of context. This isn't a rational debate, it's
a rabid fan debate.
GO PATS!!!!
GO SOX!!!!!!!
George
|
63.462 | Admittedly, .461 puts it in perspective | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:52 | 14 |
| .460:
> By the time the real players return to the field, the Indians will have
> peaked and the Red Sox will roll over them easily.
In other words, George, you don't figure the strike will be settled until
Belle and Lofton have retired.
Of course, that would mean that the Red Sox have somehow built up a farm
system in the interim.
Sounds pretty unlikely to me.
Steve
|
63.463 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:59 | 18 |
63.464 | "huh" | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:03 | 14 |
|
Past Present ...whatever..
Let's say "overall" the past upteen years...
What's Cleveland WON?
How many Championships compared to Boston? Don't blow your horn about
Clevescum unless you got solid facts. One season into the playoffs in
F-ball and One uncompleted season in baseball does hold water!
Again, the Celts aren't gonna win it this year on next or etc but, I'LL
still be a fan....NOT a wagon jumper!
|
63.465 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:07 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 63.462 by MUNDIS::SSHERMAN "Steve Sherman @MFR" >>>
>In other words, George, you don't figure the strike will be settled until
>Belle and Lofton have retired.
I don't think you are following the spirit of this discussion.
George
|
63.466 | Let's put this in perspective..... | USCTR1::BARRY | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:13 | 4 |
|
I don't care if the Browns win the Superbowl; Cavs win the NBA; and the
Indians win the pennant, I'd rather sleep on a sidewalk in Chelsea than
live for a day in Cleveland.
|
63.467 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:16 | 10 |
63.468 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:19 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 63.467 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "STEELERS Best in the AFC Central" >>>
> The only good thing that ever came out of Boston was an EMPTY BUS!
I've seen this before and it looks like it's suppose to be funny but I don't
understand the joke.
What's the significance of an Empty Bus?
George
|
63.469 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:28 | 4 |
63.470 | "Squat" | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:45 | 6 |
|
Who cares about buses....back to the point....
Cleveland hasn't won S***!
|
63.471 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 14:03 | 9 |
| If I were a Cleveland fan I'd keep rubbing Bostonians nose in 1948 when they
ended up tied with the Red Sox and beat them in the playoff game then went on
to beat the Boston Braves in the World in 6.
That was probably Cleveland's proudest moment. For Boston I don't know. You
could point to the start of the Revolutionary War and the birth of our nation
but then that's not really anything to do with sports.
George
|
63.472 | Boston has had proud moments in baseball | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Tue Jan 03 1995 14:08 | 6 |
| There were all those World Series wins in the teens.
BTW, today is the 75th anniversary of the sale of Babe Ruth to
the Yankees.
Steve
|
63.473 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 03 1995 14:37 | 14 |
| >> Interesting idea - why do you believe this? The core of the Tribe
>> is still mostly pre- or early- prime...
> You're taking my comments out of context. This isn't a rational debate, it's
> a rabid fan debate.
OK, I see now...
(Though, I must admit, I originally misread your note as touting the
superiority of the _White_ Sox. Had I realized quickly enough that
you were referring to the _Red_ Sox, I wouldn't have found the idea
quite so interesting, save from a psychological perspective... B^)
Joe
|
63.474 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:31 | 18 |
63.475 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:38 | 13 |
|
Over the past five years neither city has won a title in football,
basketball or baseball. If you want to hang your hat on divsion or
conference championships then go ahead. You really have to because
it's all you have. If you want to talk world championships then
throw your hat on that chair over there because you haven't won any.
I'd venture to guess that you weren't even alive when the Browns
won those titles in the '50s. I however can remember vividly the great
Bruins teams ofthe early '70s, the three Red Sox trips to the WS in
the last three decades, the great Bird-led 'Tics teams and some very
good and yes, some very bad) Patriots teams. Cleveland hasn't even
gotten to the Big Dance in the last 30 years much less taken home
the blue ribbon.
|
63.476 | "yeah" | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:52 | 6 |
|
Re:63.475
What he said.....
|
63.477 | "careful" | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:53 | 3 |
|
I guess I should have said what that note said..
|
63.478 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:02 | 10 |
| Boston's biggest sports accomplishment in the last few years is the silver
medal that Kerrigan won during the Olympics.
Boston's only national level win in the last couple years was Kerrigan's 1st
place at the Nationals year before last.
Better rethink this "figure skating is not a sport" stuff.
:*)}
George
|
63.479 | How quickly they come...and go. | SALEM::DODA | Go Speed Racer, GO! | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:13 | 3 |
| Ah, memories of Swindell vs Clemens....
daryll
|
63.480 | Tommy, don't begrudge these Cleveland fans their memories... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:16 | 7 |
|
I was both alive and clearly and vividly remember The Drive, The Fumble,
and the Good-Old-Fashioned-S^&%-Kicking-Behind-the-Woodshed ...
glenn
|
63.481 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Feb 13 1995 14:27 | 8 |
|
Rumors are that the Indians are close to signing Tom Gordon &
Kent Mercker.
Great moves - much better way to spend $ than taking a chance that
Swift will be healthy, IMHO.
Joe
|
63.482 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Feb 13 1995 15:47 | 8 |
63.483 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Feb 14 1995 08:08 | 14 |
|
It all depends upon how the bullpen comes together...
The offense isn't going to get any better, but with luck shouldn't
be any worse.
The starting pitching has a chance, with the possible signings,
to improve significantly.
The bullpen does to, _but_ will Grover go w/ the young (and very
good, IMHO) arms of Ogea & Lopez over half-baked vets? Wettleland
sure would look nice in the Tribe's bullpen...
Joe
|
63.484 | Sox will rule the East Yanks will slip big time | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Tue Feb 14 1995 08:36 | 5 |
|
Nice try Joe but Wettleland is going to be a Sox.
Jerry
|
63.485 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Feb 14 1995 14:48 | 4 |
|
Possibly. He'd still look great in the Tribe's bullpen, though... B^)
Joe
|
63.486 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Mar 16 1995 09:33 | 18 |
|
Indians made a nice pick up yesterday, signing Gregg Olson (the
one who pitches, not the one who catches) to a minor league
contract yesterday. Olson has a higher upside than most, if
not all, of the other names that the Cleveland papers have named.
Certainly Beck or Wetteland would be better, but at least Olson
has been excellent when healthy, and isn't old enough to make that
case too unlikely in the future.
The Indians are also said to have Kent Mercker and Tom Gordon
locked up.
As much as I'm looking forward to replacement-ball, the Indians
should have a really good team when the regulars return...
And the replacements aren't doing too bad in their absence (9-6)...
Joe
|
63.487 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Mar 16 1995 09:56 | 6 |
| Atlanta didn't have all that much luck with Gregg Olson last year. He had
an ERA around 9.5 and walked 13 guys in 12 innings.
Any reason to believe that he's going to turn back into the old Gregg Olson?
George
|
63.488 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Mar 16 1995 10:29 | 7 |
|
> Any reason to believe that he's going to turn back into the old Gregg Olson?
Not particularly, but given his age a recovery isn't out of the
question. And the Tribe's not out much if he doesn't...
Joe
|
63.489 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu May 11 1995 08:30 | 21 |
63.490 | only morons dump on a city they've never been to | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu May 11 1995 08:32 | 5 |
63.491 | | MR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKS | | Thu May 11 1995 10:15 | 9 |
| Personally I would never Raise my Family in any city, and I hope to
never have to work directly in one either (That major city's I dont
consider a city Like MARLBORO as a major city, although I don't
think I'd want to Live there either).
-1, been there seen it and really its not better or worse then boston
just doenst have the history of boston... but then again no city does
mab
|
63.492 | Just curious | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Wed May 17 1995 13:51 | 6 |
|
Any Clevescum fans interested in a PNAME wager for this weekend
series?
Jerry
|
63.493 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Harry Browne in 96 | Wed May 17 1995 14:00 | 2 |
|
sure.............
|
63.494 | All the tribe has to do is split | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Wed May 17 1995 15:19 | 7 |
|
Seeing it is a 4 game series Sox have to win 3 for a week anything
less than that and its a week. If either team sweeps its two weeks.
Jerry
|
63.495 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed May 17 1995 15:42 | 6 |
| I've tried parsing Note 63.494 in everything from English to FORTRAN but I
keep coming up empty.
What are you talking about?
George
|
63.496 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | JJS the BucketsMaster | Wed May 17 1995 16:22 | 5 |
|
what's left to say but you're on....but I'm generous 2-2 is a tie and
no one wears a p-name of the other's choice............
mike
|
63.497 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed May 17 1995 17:58 | 12 |
63.498 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed May 17 1995 20:53 | 10 |
|
Just how many weeks do want to sign up for, Jerry?
Count me in...
And Paul, who's to say that working in Hudson with such a plethora
of Indians fans hasn't rubbed off on Mike? Maybe he'll even be
rooting for the Cavs soon...
Joe
|
63.499 | Sox should win 3 | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Thu May 18 1995 07:38 | 10 |
|
re George...
Seems everyone got it but you.
Two weeks for a sweep is fine Joe, Paul, Mike. Is Paul the only one
taking the odds thing. Mike sees a split as split.
jerry
|
63.500 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu May 18 1995 08:27 | 6 |
63.501 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | JJS the BucketsMaster | Thu May 18 1995 08:48 | 6 |
|
Paul, I have rooted for the Indians for as long as I've been in the
file. No bandwagon jumping for me. I blew off the soxs in the
seventies when I became old enough to make my own choices.
;^)
|
63.502 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu May 18 1995 10:56 | 7 |
| RE <<< Note 63.499 by AD::HEATH "Pitchers and catchers report when???" >>>
> Seems everyone got it but you.
Everyone?
George
|
63.503 | here we go again | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Thu May 18 1995 12:56 | 9 |
|
Paul...
I was refering to Mike taking a split as being even. What I meant by
odds was the 3 games to 1 for me to pin a pname on you. If you want a
month for a sweep so be it.
Jerry
|
63.504 | btw, I'm reading The Great Crusade or Ike's favorite lies | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu May 18 1995 13:07 | 6 |
| You know Eisenhower had the DDay invasion plan settled faster than you
guys are getting this bet beteen division runner-ups down.
But I'll tell you one thing, if there's a sweep it's the tribe being
swept and you can pin "Rosemary Clooney sips" on me for a month if the
opposite happens
|
63.505 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu May 18 1995 15:01 | 13 |
|
> You know Eisenhower had the DDay invasion plan settled faster than you
> guys are getting this bet beteen division runner-ups down.
OK, the Sox are more likely than not not going to finish above the
Yankees this year.
But just whom, pray tell, do you expect the Indians to finish behind?
And will you back it up with the pname bet I offered? The only team
taken so far is the Yankees; if the Indians don't finish first in the
Central someone else is going to have a better record...
Joe
|
63.506 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu May 18 1995 15:26 | 25 |
63.507 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu May 18 1995 15:48 | 9 |
| well does that mean your taking my pname bet on the indians not
sweeping? I'm putting a lot up on that one cause ol' rc is one great
babe.
As an opinion I'd think you're dismissing the White Sox awful early
what with some pure hitting out there to be bought if Reinsdorf
chooses. And Cleveland vs Redsox straight up for season record is a
stretch with all the ifn maybes still connected to our pointed toward
97 redsox. See me for an ALC bet when they go head to head.
|
63.508 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu May 18 1995 16:41 | 21 |
63.509 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu May 18 1995 16:49 | 25 |
63.510 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Thu May 18 1995 16:51 | 6 |
|
Not that it is real important or anything, but it is actually
2 * (�*�*�*�) or 1 in 8 or 12.5%
Marc
|
63.511 | And Sele won't be in the weekend rotation but I'm a sport | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu May 18 1995 16:58 | 4 |
| Okay, add me in opposite Joe Huber to make this even, since you're not
going to make me mess with Rosemary
Didn't Jim Thorpe play for Cleveland?
|
63.512 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu May 18 1995 17:01 | 4 |
63.513 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Thu May 18 1995 17:49 | 6 |
|
Correct, but in your original statement you said that "either" team
would sweep. Whereas it is a 6.3% chance for each team.
Marc
|
63.514 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu May 18 1995 17:58 | 4 |
63.515 | (8^)* | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Playing with box the kids came in! | Thu May 18 1995 20:26 | 9 |
|
>> my mistake... when my brain is going 90 mph
Groaner, something that small definitely isn't safe at that speed, in
fact, like the Corvair, it's UNSAFE AT ANY SPEED. Please belt it in
before it falls out your ear and blows away in the breeze.
JaKe
|
63.516 | good one JaKe | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | | Thu May 18 1995 23:51 | 9 |
|
re -1 Dooooooooooooooooooogh!
My icecream sangwich almost came outta my nose after
that one.
Shark
|
63.517 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox rule, tribe sucks! | Fri May 19 1995 07:50 | 10 |
63.518 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri May 19 1995 08:12 | 10 |
63.519 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri May 19 1995 08:13 | 3 |
63.520 | Still I wonder if Eshelman is for real | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Fri May 19 1995 09:05 | 10 |
|
Sox take game 1 on an 8th inning blast from Mcfarlane. Didn't
have to good of a feeling about this game when Pierce game in
followed by Lilliquist. But Belinda got it done and Mcfarlane
added his 2 game winning HR of the year. Clark and Smith tonight
should be a good match up.
Jerry
|
63.521 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri May 19 1995 09:17 | 4 |
63.522 | RE: .518 | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Fri May 19 1995 09:37 | 14 |
|
Don't feel too bad about trading Mlicki - the guy never really did much.
Two wins does not a career make.
Now trading him and someone else for an *outfielder* - that's another matter.
The Tribe are *loaded* in the outfield - if they wanted a little depth, they
could have signed any of a number of free agents on the cheap. And depth is
what Burnitz is - he won't be pushing Belle, Lofton, or Ramirez out of a job
anytime soon. (Although I haven't seen much of Ramirez's fielding - I hear
it's not Gold Glove caliber...)
You're right, though - Lewis for Costo was totally useless.
Roland
|
63.523 | | SALEM::DODA | Kids, don't try this at home... | Fri May 19 1995 10:22 | 9 |
| My b-i-l lives in Baltimore and the papers down there are
blasting the Orioles for letting a prospect like Eshelman go.
The team response is that they have plenty of prospects and
couldn't keep all of em. Problem is, he's a lefty and even they
admit they're lefty prospects are thin.
Nice move DQ.
daryll
|
63.524 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri May 19 1995 10:55 | 6 |
63.525 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri May 19 1995 23:31 | 10 |
63.526 | that one hurt | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Sat May 20 1995 10:56 | 3 |
|
Ryan sucks. Will never amount to a reliable closer.
|
63.527 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sat May 20 1995 19:27 | 8 |
63.528 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun May 21 1995 19:51 | 6 |
63.529 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon May 22 1995 10:04 | 6 |
|
Expecting something of a White Sox surge...
September 22nd, clinch w/ a Tribe win.
Joe
|
63.530 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue May 23 1995 11:18 | 3 |
| Can we have a look at their schedule for the last 2 weeks?
George
|
63.531 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 23 1995 17:56 | 48 |
63.532 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed May 24 1995 10:14 | 4 |
| Ok, Sep 26 -- at Minnesota, the Indians will beat the "Twinkies" to win the
division.
George
|
63.533 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 09:08 | 11 |
63.534 | It will cost them but how much? | AD::HEATH | Red Sox suck Tribe rooooools | Tue May 30 1995 10:07 | 7 |
|
Paul...
How many times can the Tribe come back in the late innings?
Jerry
|
63.535 | Changes for Tribe? | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Tue May 30 1995 10:11 | 7 |
| Paul,
Gammons wrote Sunday that the Tribe is seriously thinking of starting
Tavarez and another kid and kicking Clark and Black out of the
rotation.
Your wish may come true.
Mike
|
63.536 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue May 30 1995 10:13 | 18 |
|
While Ogea or Tavarez are better than Grimsley, Grimsley's no stiff.
He does need to be used w/ care - he can't go over 100 pitches and
come back strong - but he can pitch. The real problem is that Hargrove
seems to think a lefty starter is necessary, rather than just nice to
have if you've got one. A starting staff of Nagy, Martinez, Hershiser,
Tavarez, and Ogea, with Clark coming back once he's regained his
effectiveness in Buffalo, would be fine. Assenmacher, Poole, and Plunk
provide nice support for Mesa (who's really surprised me - as a starter
he was a stiff, as a reliever he's been quite good) in the bullpen...
Meanwhile Ramirez is the MVP-to-this-point, and with help from Thome &
Sorrento & Baerga has made the relatively poor starts by Belle & Lofton
hurt less.
It's going to be a fun season...
Joe
|
63.537 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue May 30 1995 10:16 | 6 |
|
] How many times can the Tribe come back in the late innings?
Probably about as many as they can build an early lead.
Joe
|
63.538 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 12:16 | 11 |
63.539 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 12:17 | 3 |
63.540 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue May 30 1995 12:17 | 3 |
| Isn't that because Cleveland has more seats than the Red Sox?
George
|
63.541 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 12:20 | 6 |
63.542 | Are they calling it spirit of '54 or '48? | AKOCOA::BREEN | Indians rule,sox sip; Phillip is six | Tue May 30 1995 12:57 | 10 |
| When's the last time the Indians outdrew the redsox - 59?, 66? Last
year doesn't count.
I was interested in the tribe but they're about 3 years behind
schedule. I still question the pitching but perhaps there's no one to
challenge them except KC if they get going. I don't know what's going
on with chi-sox, you tell me.
Good luck Indians, you'll have to do it without me but it's a long way
to tipperary.
|
63.543 | | SALEM::DODA | Chairman of the Bored | Tue May 30 1995 13:07 | 1 |
| Benes has been getting pounded regularly hasn't he?
|
63.544 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue May 30 1995 13:44 | 8 |
| <<< Note 63.543 by SALEM::DODA "Chairman of the Bored" >>>
>Benes has been getting pounded regularly hasn't he?
Name ERA W L SV IP H BB SO ER HR G GS CG GF SH
Andy Benes 5.625 0 4 0 32.0 40 12 30 20 5 6 6 0 0 0
George
|
63.545 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 13:51 | 9 |
|
>When's the last time the Indians outdrew the redsox - 59?, 66? Last
>year doesn't count.
What a joke!
When is the last time the Red Sox won the World Series, none of the
championships prior to 1919 count.
|
63.546 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue May 30 1995 13:52 | 9 |
| Re <<< Note 63.545 by AKEEM::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>
> When is the last time the Red Sox won the World Series, none of the
> championships prior to 1919 count.
When was the last time the Indians won the Series? Championships prior to
1949 don't count.
George
|
63.547 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 13:53 | 4 |
|
George, have a clue pal. Cleveland's going all the way this year and
Boston AIN'T! Bottom line, the Sox will not win a WS championship
before the Indians!
|
63.548 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Tue May 30 1995 14:00 | 12 |
| >>Boston AIN'T! Bottom line, the Sox will not win a WS championship
>>before the Indians!
Hey Groaner, you should find someone to bet on that lasted line, there.
Only problem is, neither of ya would be alive to see who wins!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
JaKe
|
63.549 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue May 30 1995 14:05 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 63.547 by AKEEM::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>
> George, have a clue pal. Cleveland's going all the way this year and
> Boston AIN'T! Bottom line, the Sox will not win a WS championship
> before the Indians!
Maybe and maybe not. Just about everyone was saying back around 1991 that
Atlanta was going all the way but Braves fans are still holding their breath.
They came real close staying alive past game 6 against the Twins then staying
alive past 9 innings of game 7, about as close as you can get but no cigar.
Baseball's a funny game. As Yogi says ...
George
|
63.550 | heard this about Benes recently... | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue May 30 1995 14:32 | 3 |
| Some scout was quoted recently as saying that SD's front office is
convinced that Benes is no more than a #3, and an innings horse...gives
up lots of hits.
|
63.551 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 14:39 | 11 |
63.552 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue May 30 1995 15:07 | 7 |
| > there as the #4 or Bud Black?
I can't believe Black is on any ML roster.
Has Cleveland had any serious injuries yet ? Given the way they're
dropping around MLB, it's bound to get them sooner or later. Tough
to get too excited when we're not even 20% into the season yet....
|
63.553 | "No More Dead Last!!!..." | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue May 30 1995 15:27 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 63.552 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>Has Cleveland had any serious injuries yet ? Given the way they're
>dropping around MLB, it's bound to get them sooner or later. Tough
>to get too excited when we're not even 20% into the season yet....
Indian fans get excited at the prospect of winning over 60 games per year
which looks pretty good at this point.
George
|
63.554 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 15:39 | 5 |
63.555 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue May 30 1995 15:50 | 20 |
| I agree that on paper the Indians are the best team in the A.L. but it's
a long road from being the best team going in to June and winning the World
Series. To get into the playoffs they have to:
- avoid injuries through June, July, Aug, Sept.
- avoid protracted hitting slumps.
- not get overtaken by some hot team in their division with a knack for
winning 1 run games down the stretch.
Once in the playoffs, they have to have some luck to avoid getting knocked
off by one of the other division winners or the wild card. If they accomplish
all that, then they have to go head to head against the N.L. champion who
unlike the other A.L. teams may well be as good as them on paper.
It's not like basketball or hockey where the stronger team almost always wins
a 7 game series. Two or three untimely slumps and/or sore elbows and a ball
that just won't drop on the right side of the foul line and suddenly the best
team loses a playoff in 5 or 6 games.
George
|
63.556 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Tue May 30 1995 15:56 | 20 |
|
Don't know why I'm doing this but!!!
Groaner if the Yanks are healthy, they are the best team in
the AL! Cleveland might have the best hitting team in baseball but
after Nagy Cleveland's pitchers don't scare anyone! Jose Mesa is a
Ken Ryan Closer clone!
In a 7 game series I'd bet the farm on the Yanks with a healthy
Key, Mcdowell, Perez, Kam, Hitchcock, Wetteland, Howe and Wickman over
Nagy, Martinez (40) Hershiser (?) Black, Tavarez, Assenmacher and Mesa.
With that Pitching staff of yours I wouldn't get fitted for the
ring yet!
Remember it's only May and Pennants are not won in May!
Chap
|
63.557 | | SALEM::DODA | Chairman of the Bored | Tue May 30 1995 16:01 | 3 |
| Oh for the glory years of Greg Swindell.....
daryll
|
63.558 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue May 30 1995 16:10 | 1 |
| and just last year Cleveland was 0-9 vs. NY
|
63.559 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Tue May 30 1995 16:15 | 3 |
|
0-13 before they beat us 1 game so far this year???
|
63.560 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue May 30 1995 17:06 | 9 |
63.561 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed May 31 1995 08:30 | 10 |
63.562 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Wed May 31 1995 09:29 | 10 |
|
And I told you I'd bet on who goes to the series not on regular
season records! Unlike Cleveland the Yankees have won a few
championships (22) and regular season champs don't mean as much.
So put your P'name where your mouth is!
chap
|
63.563 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed May 31 1995 10:51 | 7 |
|
OK, Chappy, how about this...
I'll bet you one week of pname for who has the better regular
season record & one week for who goes further in the post season.
Joe
|
63.564 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed May 31 1995 11:02 | 5 |
| > I'll bet you one week of pname for who has the better regular
> season record & one week for who goes further in the post season.
don't bite Chap...hold out for the AL pennant winner...with Cleveland
the odds are in your favor....
|
63.565 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Wed May 31 1995 11:21 | 10 |
|
Another Front runner heard from?
Nope it's the pennant or nuttin! whatsamatta Indian fans no
confidence in your rattlesnake bitten team?
chap
|
63.566 | Definate favorites | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Wed May 31 1995 11:43 | 8 |
| The Yankees led by Donny Baseball, Wade Boggs and Jack MacDowell are so
far superior to any other AL team that it's sickening. Red Sox and all
other AL teams fans should be content right now if there team comes in
second to the mighty Bronx Bombers. All Hail King George.
:^)
Mike
|
63.567 | Must be all THOSE YANKEE PLAYERS ON YOUR ROTIS TEAM | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Wed May 31 1995 11:50 | 5 |
|
Mike,
I knew you'd come around!!
|
63.568 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed May 31 1995 11:56 | 16 |
|
> Another Front runner heard from?
Yup, that's right, I certainly have _never_ rooted for the Tribe before
this year... B^)
> Nope it's the pennant or nuttin! whatsamatta Indian fans no
> confidence in your rattlesnake bitten team?
Sorry, I thought who went farther in the post season was what you
wanted.
OK, then, a week for regular season record & one week for the pennant,
then.
Joe
|
63.569 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Wed May 31 1995 11:58 | 7 |
|
I don't want anything to do with a regular season bet. It's like
getting your second choice to go to the prom with you!
chap
|
63.570 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed May 31 1995 12:09 | 8 |
| Well actually, 2nd choice for the prom is probably someone pretty good.
Regular season is more like getting stuck taking someone assigned to you by the
Guidance Counselor.
Although I will say that I was grateful for the efforts of Mrs. Bottlefry on
my behalf.
George
|
63.571 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Wed May 31 1995 12:12 | 8 |
|
BTW Joe I know you are an Indian fan but I was corresponding with
mr groaner and thats why I called you another front runner. I know you
wouldn't have took this bet last year?
chap
|
63.572 | It is Prom Season | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Wed May 31 1995 12:15 | 12 |
| >> I don't want anything to do with a regular season bet. It's like
>> getting your second choice to go to the prom with you!
>> chap
Chap,
Any personal stories you'd like to share with us? I heard your second
choice was one of your cousins? Not that I'd believe that.
:^)
Mike
|
63.573 | Indian fans, whew | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed May 31 1995 12:17 | 7 |
| How come you make attendance statements and when someone compares the
last 25 years you then retreat to 1948, the great Cleveland lighthouse
in the sea of futility (with a few buoys called All America conference
championships).
And I suppose if the Indians fold you'll trot down the freeway to
neighboring Kansas City to root for the Royals.
|
63.574 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed May 31 1995 12:34 | 17 |
|
Chappy,
OK; I was willing to take your bet if you were willing to take mine,
but if you'd prefer neither...
> BTW Joe I know you are an Indian fan but I was corresponding with
> mr groaner and thats why I called you another front runner. I know you
> wouldn't have took this bet last year?
It would have depended upon what mood you caught me in last year.
Last year, the Tribe had significantly worse pitching, and was less
willing to go with young pitchers. They've improved this year, and
are (along w/ the Yankees) one of the best teams in baseball this
year.
Joe
|
63.575 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Wed May 31 1995 12:45 | 5 |
|
I agree the Tribe is very strong. Just with groaner making them
out to be the 27 Yanks someone had to try and shut him up!
|
63.576 | all they have to do is win 110 gms | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | fifty lashes with a gui icon | Wed May 31 1995 12:50 | 2 |
|
|
63.577 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed May 31 1995 14:28 | 6 |
|
In 144 games?
I'll be quite happy w/ 100...
Joe
|
63.578 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed May 31 1995 16:28 | 6 |
63.579 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed May 31 1995 16:29 | 4 |
63.580 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed May 31 1995 16:37 | 4 |
| No I don't think so. As I recall the Cincinnati Redstockings were undefeated
back around 1869.
George
|
63.581 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 01 1995 08:03 | 16 |
63.582 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Thu Jun 01 1995 10:18 | 5 |
|
Which team has the biggest division lead in all of baseball?
:^)
Ron
|
63.583 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 01 1995 10:40 | 26 |
63.584 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Thu Jun 01 1995 10:51 | 16 |
|
> AL Central Race:
> W L GB
> Cleveland 21 9 --
> Chicago 11 19 10
> Eliminated:
> Milwaukee
> Minnesota
> Kansas City
I have no doubt that Cleveland will take the division, but how
did KC get eliminated while Chicago is still alive? Is this the
advent of GroanerMath? :-)
Roland
|
63.585 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 01 1995 10:51 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 63.583 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>
> Exactly, anything less than a WS ring for the sox is a choke.
Which Sox are you talking about? I don't think either the Red Sox or White
Sox are in a position where losing would be a choke. Both have some fine
players and could make the playoffs if they got/stayed healthy but neither
is a lock.
George
|
63.586 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jun 01 1995 11:09 | 7 |
| >RE <<< Note 63.583 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>
> Exactly, anything less than a WS ring for the sox is a choke.
By the chest-thumping going on in here, I think the same HAS TO BE said
for the Indians...
|
63.587 | Kinda like saying Ken Ryan had a helluva save yesterday | AD::HEATH | Bill Buckner my hero | Thu Jun 01 1995 11:14 | 4 |
|
Yup gotta agree with ya Paul.... 3 come from behind victories
is without a doubt a sound thrashing.
|
63.588 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Jun 01 1995 11:27 | 10 |
|
Po' po' Groaner. On that vicious cycle again. You could tell
the seasons by him. If he's celebrating about the Indians then
it must be Spring. If he's quiet or dejected about the Indians
then it is surely early Fall. If he's happy about the Browns then
it's still Fall but if he's bummed then Winter has set in. The
Cavs take over after the Browns and carry Groaner through the
Winter only to bum him out in the Spring when the Indians take
over and start the whole vicious cycle all over again.
|
63.589 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Thu Jun 01 1995 11:47 | 2 |
|
Anything less then the Tribe winning the WS is a choke job...
|
63.590 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 01 1995 12:03 | 9 |
| I don't really agree with that either. I'd say they are favored to win
the American League but in baseball the margin between teams is very small
so a bit of bad luck can take any time out of a 7 game series.
And if they do win the American League their chances of winning the series
will probably be about even. There are teams in the N.L. that are easily as
good as the Indians.
George
|
63.591 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 01 1995 12:04 | 5 |
63.592 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 01 1995 12:04 | 4 |
63.593 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 01 1995 12:10 | 8 |
| I'd say that the Indians versus the Braves would be an even series. In post
season experience seems to count and the Braves have several players who come
alive in the fall.
Beyond that I'd say the Expos, or Reds would give them an even fight. I'm not
sure yet that the Phillies, or Cubs are for real.
George
|
63.594 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Jun 01 1995 12:14 | 7 |
|
>> p.s. nice pname,
Yes, Groaner. And for you the dream is always the same - a Cleveland
team has won a title. Unfortunately for you, the reality is always
the same, too. The forty year losing streak continues.
|
63.595 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 01 1995 12:37 | 3 |
63.596 | The first pennant race of their lives | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jun 01 1995 12:51 | 14 |
| Tommy,
According to Groaner it's only 30 years since he counts the '64
Browns nfl victory which was pre-super bowl.
The current wagon he's hitched to is very familiar to redsox fans
as it shows good hitting but questionable pitching. The other unknown
is how the indians can do under pressure since none of the 59 team is
still around except Herb Score in the announcer's booth.
Now the tribe fans can take a hit on the sox fans by pointing out
that 2 of the 3 division winners in the last 10 years didn't make the
world series. We can't critize them back, no material.
billte
|
63.597 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 01 1995 13:51 | 7 |
63.598 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 01 1995 13:56 | 7 |
63.599 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Thu Jun 01 1995 13:57 | 34 |
|
>><<< Note 63.592 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>
>>Which teams in the NL are easily as good as the Indians. Several of
>>the players in preseason on the top NL teams were in awe of the talent
>>on the Indians - including players from Montreal and Atlanta.
Ooooooooohhh!!! By Clevescum logic, as we see from HAL every year,
this means that they're lock to win it all, then, right??
Who gives two good sh_ts if someone was in awe of them, especially
Montreal. Lasted time I checked, Montreal held a garage sale over the
winter and is slightly above a AAA team right now(although the Pirates
are a AA team right now).
Ya know Groaner, it musta been something in the air that fouled up the
miniscule brains younzes got and made ya count yer chickens early in
the season and then head for a bridge late in the season. A 4-1/2 game
lead in yer division(or whatever it is today) in late May or early June
don'/t mean skwat when it comes to who's still around in the end of
September.
the only way to increase the IQ of a Clevescumite is to remove their
complete brain(a delicate procedure knowing how small it is in a head
filled with cow manure).
JMHO
JaKe
|
63.600 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 01 1995 14:25 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 63.596 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> According to Groaner it's only 30 years since he counts the '64
> Browns nfl victory which was pre-super bowl.
Wasn't that the game where Lou Groza kicked the phantom field goal in the
blizzard which everyone but the ref said was wide?
George
|
63.601 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jun 01 1995 14:50 | 5 |
| > According to Groaner it's only 30 years since he counts the '64
> Browns nfl victory which was pre-super bowl.
Hey, those titles count ! The Pack leads with 11 NFL titles, and 9 of 'em
came pre-SB...spread out throughout the league's history.
|
63.602 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 01 1995 15:09 | 6 |
| I'm with the Indian fans on this. Those old NFL titles are legitimate.
Of course if you count NBA and NHL titles, Boston pulls way ahead of
Cleveland.
George
|
63.603 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Thu Jun 01 1995 15:25 | 5 |
| > p.s. Its pretty sad when I can safely declare that I've been to more
> Indians games in person over the past 10 years that probably 75% of
> the so called Red Sox fans in this notesfile.
If they're Red Sox fans, why would they want to go to Indians games? :-)
|
63.604 | Mo, go ahead and do those charity events, you've earned it | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jun 01 1995 17:44 | 16 |
| By the way I picked up the book "Cobb" by Al Stump and it's great.It
mentions Cleaveland winning a pennant with Tris Speaker managing. I
don't know how they did in the series (1920?) but youse tribe fanatics
may as well jump on it.
I went to a sox game in '93 with my cousin who picked up cheap rf
grandstand family day seats and saw Ripken and the Orioles. There must
have been another visit from '85 on but I can't recall it.
But then again I find I can manage the sox perfectly well from the
occasional box score and the odd inning or two on channel 38. I can
tell you that Alicia is the key to 20-10 and Vaughn has his head back
on straight in the field and I take back all the nasty things I posted
during the long cold winter about good ol' Mo.
billtg
|
63.605 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 01 1995 18:15 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 63.604 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> By the way I picked up the book "Cobb" by Al Stump and it's great.It
> mentions Cleaveland winning a pennant with Tris Speaker managing. I
> don't know how they did in the series (1920?) but youse tribe fanatics
> may as well jump on it.
Well I'm hardly a tribe fanatic but according to my baseball wall chart, the
Indians won in 1920 defeating the Dodgers. That season Star SS Ray Chapman was
killed by a ball pitched by Carl Mays. Bill Wambsganss recorded an unassisted
triple play during the World Series. That Dodger team was the one that was
involved the 26 inning game earlier that year.
George
|
63.606 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 08:36 | 33 |
63.607 | I'd still take Vaughn for the ave/ob % | AD::HEATH | Bill Buckner my hero | Fri Jun 02 1995 09:13 | 3 |
|
Valentin over Vizquel in a NY minute.
|
63.608 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 09:35 | 6 |
63.609 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 02 1995 09:35 | 8 |
|
> Valentin over Vizquel in a NY minute.
And Vaughn over Sorrento, and McFarlane over Pena.
Looking at the other six positions, though...
Joe
|
63.610 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 09:36 | 4 |
63.611 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 02 1995 09:37 | 10 |
|
> I'm talking overall here Jerry, Omar is the #1 defensive shortstop
> in the AL and probably in baseball. With this line-up, I'll take
> his lower SLG% and more SBs and better D over Valentin. Omar can
> bunt and move runners over too, JV just goes for the jack.
Jerry probably is too; Valentin's defense is on par with Vizquel's,
even if it doesn't look as flashy...
Joe
|
63.612 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 09:39 | 2 |
63.613 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 02 1995 09:55 | 6 |
|
OK, then, can you explain why, consistently over his career, Valentin
has turned a higher percentage of balls hit into his area into
outs than Vizquel?
Joe
|
63.614 | Valentin's the real V-man... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 02 1995 10:37 | 14 |
|
> I'm talking overall here Jerry, Omar is the #1 defensive shortstop
> in the AL and probably in baseball. With this line-up, I'll take
> his lower SLG% and more SBs and better D over Valentin. Omar can
> bunt and move runners over too, JV just goes for the jack.
...and gets it (all or The Wall) often enough. But why take two
bases or more when you can bunt?
Tribe fans arguing amongst each other... the Apocalypse is near...
glenn
|
63.615 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 02 1995 10:52 | 18 |
| Valentin v. Vizquel is no contest. Take a look at their numbers as of Week 4.
G AB R H TB D T HR RBI BB SO SB CS E
John Valentin 28 106 25 32 60 8 1 6 20 24 18 4 1 2
Omar Vizquel 27 114 20 26 38 3 0 3 13 11 13 4 1 2
For Valentin that works out to 26.45 Runs Created using the Bill James
Runs Created formula against 11.85 for Vizquel and 9.52 Runs Created per
game for Valentin versus 3.594 for Vizquel. As for defense, the addition runs
allowed by Valentin, if any, would be far fewer than the extra runs he
generates.
Valentin is unchallenged as the best short stop in the American League. He's
solid on defense and no one else comes close to his offensive stats. The only
short stop in the majors who comes out better in generating offense is Barry
Larkin.
George
|
63.616 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 11:15 | 13 |
63.617 | THE FUTURE IS HERE!!!!!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NY YANKEES 1995 WORLD CHAMPS!!!!! | Fri Jun 02 1995 11:20 | 3 |
|
DEREK JETER > JOHN VALENTIN > OMAR VIZQUEL
|
63.618 | greenwell is heading for japan, somewhere he can put up decent numbers | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 11:27 | 12 |
63.619 | The old Groaner double standard | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jun 02 1995 11:28 | 6 |
|
>> Okay George, so you're rating players based on 28 games...
This from the guy who has teams conceding the race to Cleveland
already.
|
63.620 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 02 1995 11:40 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 63.616 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>
> Okay George, so you're rating players based on 28 games... Why not
> trade me Kirby Puckett .241 for Matt Mieske .294 in BNBAL.
Ok, how about last year.
Name Rc Rcg gms avr Ab Ht Hr
John Valentin 61.011 7.958 84 0.316 301 95 9
Omar Vizquel 31.898 4.062 69 0.273 286 78 1
Did Vizquel really save 4 runs a game more than Valentin on defense?
George
|
63.621 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 02 1995 11:46 | 10 |
|
> Did Vizquel really save 4 runs a game more than Valentin on defense?
Actually, FWIW, he wouldn't have had to - the 4 run/game difference
is for teams made up completely of Valentins or Vizquels. The
actual difference, offerensively, was 4/9. Vizquel would have
had to save 4/9 of a run a game more than Valentin on average
to be equal.
Joe
|
63.622 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 12:06 | 4 |
63.623 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 02 1995 12:13 | 16 |
| <<< Note 63.621 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
>Vizquel would have
> had to save 4/9 of a run a game more than Valentin on average
> to be equal.
That comes to one run every other game. Is there really that big a difference
on defense?
Looking at their Runs Created numbers of 61 and 32 respectively which is not
based on a team of one guy but is an estimate of the number of runs they add to
the team. Valintin would have had to have been responsible for allowing 29 more
runs than Vizquel over the season for defense to have made a difference. Is
Vizquel that much better than Valintin on defense?
George
|
63.624 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 02 1995 12:21 | 33 |
|
>> Vizquel would have
>> had to save 4/9 of a run a game more than Valentin on average
>> to be equal.
>That comes to one run every other game. Is there really that big a difference
>on defense?
Can there be? Yes. See Ozzie Smith.
Is there? I _really_ _really_ doubt it.
That said, a 1/2 a game saved _is_ worth more to the Indians than
1/2 a game scored, so Vizquel's defense wouldn't even have to be
that much better.
Of course, IMHO Vizquel's defense isn't better, so it's irrelevant.
>Looking at their Runs Created numbers of 61 and 32 respectively which is not
>based on a team of one guy but is an estimate of the number of runs they add to
>the team. Valintin would have had to have been responsible for allowing 29 more
>runs than Vizquel over the season for defense to have made a difference. Is
>Vizquel that much better than Valintin on defense?
OK, that's the same thing as the 4/9 of a run/game.
And the best answer I can see is that, Vizquel isn't that much better
than John Valentin defensively. Statistically, Valentin's actually
superior (using Defensive Average); even given the flaws of that
statistic, I doubt Vizquel comes out _better_.
Joe
|
63.625 | Vizquel == MOP == Massively Overrated Player | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 02 1995 14:00 | 1 |
|
|
63.626 | Mo Vaughn == MOP == Massively Overrated Player | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 14:25 | 1 |
63.627 | Roger Clemens = = MOP == Massively Overrated Player | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 14:25 | 1 |
63.628 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 14:26 | 5 |
63.629 | He's right... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 02 1995 14:33 | 10 |
|
> Clemens claimed in an in parts of an interview shown on ESPN last night
> that if the Sox win it all this year, he'll retire. He also claims
> that he's a guarentee for the HOF even if he retires after this year.
> He's dreaming.
That's one dream that is already certain to come true...
glenn
|
63.630 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Fri Jun 02 1995 14:36 | 3 |
| Clemens is an absolute lock for the HOF. Wake up Iceman your dreaming
Jimbo
|
63.631 | | SALEM::DODA | Chairman of the Bored | Fri Jun 02 1995 14:58 | 3 |
| Clemens is in. You're thinking of Joe Charboneau....
daryll
|
63.632 | Groaner==MON==Massively Obnoxious Noter | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Fri Jun 02 1995 15:22 | 3 |
|
JaKe
|
63.633 | Tribe==MOT==Massively Overrated Team | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Fri Jun 02 1995 16:04 | 3 |
|
Cleveland Indians === MOT === Massively Overrated Team
|
63.634 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 16:50 | 4 |
63.635 | He's a blow hard he won't retire. Unless Omar stops making uni's big enuf | AD::HEATH | Bill Buckner my hero | Fri Jun 02 1995 17:03 | 4 |
|
Paul take a look at his winning percentage. It is up there with
Kofax and Drysdale.
|
63.636 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 17:05 | 3 |
63.637 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 02 1995 19:12 | 4 |
63.638 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Jun 04 1995 18:01 | 12 |
63.639 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Jun 04 1995 18:02 | 8 |
63.641 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 05 1995 07:52 | 8 |
63.642 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 05 1995 07:57 | 22 |
63.643 | todd van poppel up to 94 mph on the gun | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 05 1995 07:58 | 4 |
63.644 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 05 1995 08:33 | 16 |
63.645 | rogers only way in is having known Oil Can | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 05 1995 08:34 | 6 |
63.646 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 05 1995 09:44 | 7 |
|
Well, I still think Grimsley _isn't_ a stiff, though right now he
belongs in Buffalo w/ Mark Clark. When they start throwing strikes
consistently, bring 'em back, but until then they don't belong in
the majors.
Joe
|
63.647 | HTH | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jun 05 1995 10:43 | 14 |
|
> Attention Mike Hargrove, if you read this, have a clue.
Butch Hobson is available...
> I think Roger's post season record will guarentee him a spot
> in the HoF. Highest winning percentage pitcher to have no
> wins in post season.
Obviously this statement took a trip through the HeiserFactFilter (tm).
You must have Roger confused with Bob Feller...
glenn
|
63.648 | burnitz is a stiff, so is grimsley | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 05 1995 15:35 | 8 |
63.649 | Of cours I have '78 and '74 to look back on | AKOCOA::BREEN | There are 7 conspiracies, the 1st of which is reality | Mon Jun 05 1995 16:38 | 9 |
| I have to agree with Groaner on Clemens needing more wins and even post
season accomplishment to get in the hof.
Unfortunately on the other side, euphoria for the home team is nice but
nowadays noone considers any success short of world series victory and
even after a pennant that's still a long road to climb.
And finally why are you shorting Kansas City? I'd be confident in your
shoes but no where near certain.
|
63.650 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 05 1995 17:14 | 6 |
63.651 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 05 1995 17:19 | 27 |
|
> I have to agree with Groaner on Clemens needing more wins and even post
> season accomplishment to get in the hof.
I disagree - when a pitcher is marginal, such as Nolan Ryan, career
length matters. For a pitcher like Clemens or a hitter like Bonds,
a shorter career shouldn't be a deterent.
> And finally why are you shorting Kansas City? I'd be confident in your
> shoes but no where near certain.
Why? In order:
Coleman
Goodwin
Joyner
Gaetti
Gagne
Mayne/Borders
Hiatt
Nunnally
Lind/Randa/Stynes
Hamelin
As good as Appier is, there's no way he makes up for these guys...
Joe
|
63.652 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Jun 05 1995 18:18 | 16 |
|
When looking at who should or shouldn't be in the HOF. You should
look at a players stats for his era. From 1984 (?) until Roger retires.
During that time span who was better? I don't think a pitcher should
need 300 wins to get into the HOF. If a pitcher pitches 22 years and
gets 300 wins (300/22=13.6 wins per year). Its the same as a pitcher
deciding to only play for 15 years (15*14=210 wins) and getting 210
wins.
Todays players make so much more money then previous players. A
Roger Clemens doesn't need the money, so why play the extra 7-10 years?
Roger also attended college and didn't make it to the Majors until he
was 22/23 years old. So 15 year career would make him 38 years old. He
can retire and watch his kids entire high school careers. If they
choose to participate in sports.
Ron
|
63.653 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 08:23 | 8 |
63.654 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 08:23 | 4 |
63.655 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Tue Jun 06 1995 09:57 | 21 |
|
Yes, Roger is only around 175 wins at the moment. He has only
played 11/12 seasons. IF he plays another 3/4 years and gets another
50 wins giving him about 225 wins. That would be an average of 15 wins
a season over a 15 year career. Which would then be legitimate HOF
numbers.
I'm not saying that Roger is playing just for the money. You have
to look at the economic era's. Players in the '40s, '50's, and 60's
got jobs in the off season and made well under 100k. Todays players
average over 1 million a season. With a player like Roger getting
4/5 million a season. Roger probably made less then 1 million a season
his first 3 years in the Majors. I'd say over Rogers career he has
probably made about 25/30 million in salary alone. Never mind
endorsements. So I believe that today's high salaries. Will contribute
to shorter careers. Players aren't going to give it that extra 3 years
anymore.
If Roger gave it an extra 3 years past say 15 years to give him
18 seasons. He would then be close to 300 wins. Once you get close to
300 wins. Players tend to hold on to try and get the 300.
Ron
|
63.656 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 06 1995 10:51 | 11 |
| > KC has a solid team, Cleveland is a lock for the playoffs, and I doubt
> KC has enough to catch them for the division.
This is crazy. Each team has 109 games to play, and only 5 games separating
them. In baseball, 2-8 and 9-1 over their last 10 is VERY common. I don't
think KC is a real good team, but injuries and hitting and pitching slumps
are waiting for Cleveland. Anything can happen, and usually does.
I know Cleveland has hardly ever had a contender, and you're a little
excited, but I'd think your experiences over the years would have you
a little more humble and cautious.
|
63.657 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | JJS the BucketsMaster | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:02 | 8 |
|
I'm with Paul, Cleveland's a lock. They were right there last year
only to have the rug pulled out from under them. They're hungry and
their pitching has improved.
NY on the other hand seems to be suffering from high expectations.
mike
|
63.658 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:16 | 10 |
63.659 | Cleveland in great shape; 1994-vintage Yankees aging fast | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:21 | 19 |
|
> I'm with Paul, Cleveland's a lock. They were right there last year
> only to have the rug pulled out from under them. They're hungry and
> their pitching has improved.
Yes, Cleveland has the talent and the great start; they look like a
lock. The gap between Cleveland and KC will only widen over 110+
games. Paul is right that the only serious potential challenger is
Chicago, if and when they get their act together.
> NY on the other hand seems to be suffering from high expectations.
Who knows; the shortterm window of opportunity may have closed on the
Yankees. Wouldn't that be a shame. There is some advancing age
and/or terminal injury problems on this team with key players like Key,
Tartabull, Boggs, Mattingly and a bunch of good role players in the
31-32 range. There's talent in the system but maybe based around the
current core of players, last year was the peak. Still a long way to
go, though.
|
63.660 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:23 | 21 |
63.661 | Contrast and compare with the greats already in... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:32 | 15 |
|
> I stated, that in my opinion, the Hall of Fame statement was
> false. If Clemens plays enough games to get 225 wins, then he has
> a reasonable shot at the HoF, but would not be a lock.
Grab some clue, Paul. The only way that a pitcher like Clemens who
already has roughly 175 wins, a .650 lifetime winning percentage, and
a 2.90 career ERA _doesn't_ get into the Hall of Fame with 225 wins
is if he somehow manages to lose another 100 games while compiling
those 50 wins. If Clemens finishes up 50-50 he'd still have a lifetime
winning percentage of over .600. That aren't many of those at over 200
wins...
glenn
|
63.662 | Oh, I guess there was one year they made July | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:42 | 7 |
| Joe,
Indian fans don't have any experience to make them humble; they've
been out of the races by memorial day since 1960. I wouldn't wish a
good ol' fashioned "Boston" collapse on anyone but it sure teaches you
the virtue of skepticism.
Groaner certainly isn't sandbagg'n.
|
63.663 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:49 | 10 |
|
> Indian fans don't have any experience to make them humble; they've
> been out of the races by memorial day since 1960. I wouldn't wish a
> good ol' fashioned "Boston" collapse on anyone but it sure teaches you
> the virtue of skepticism.
Well, that all depends - if they are Browns fans & Cavs fans as well,
they've got plenty built up...
Joe
|
63.664 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:53 | 40 |
| RE <<< Note 63.653 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>
>well, Jack Morris put
> up some good numbers and won the World Series, Dave Stewart put
> up some good numbers and won the World Series... yet none of those
> 3 including Roger deserve the hall of fame at this point.
Clemens did what he had to do to win a World Series. With his team up 3
games to 2 with one of those wins belonging to him he pitched 7 innings of
game 6 and only allowed 2 runs.
- It's not his fault that the Red Sox couldn't get more than 2 runs.
- It's not his fault that Calvin Sharaldi couldn't prevent the Mets from
scoring a 3rd run to match the Sox run that took them into extra innings.
- It's not his fault that with 2 out in the 10th and a 2 run lead Sharaldi
allowed Garry Frigg'en Carter to get a hit.
- It's not his fault that with 2 out in the 10th and a 2 run lead Sharaldi
allowed Kevin Frigg'en Mitchel to get another a hit.
- It's not HIS fault that with 2 out in the 10th and a 1 run lead Sharaldi
allowed RAY Frigg'en KNIGHT to get ANOTHER a hit!
- It's NOT HIS fault that with TWO OUT IN THE 10TH and a ONE RUN LEAD that
BOB FRIGG'EN STANLEY got crossed up and allowed THE TIE'EN FRIGG'EN RUN!!!
- IT'S NOT HIS FRIGG'EN FAULT THAT *** MOOKIE FRIGG'EN WILSON *** hit a
FIRGG'EN GROUNDER THROUGH BILL FRIGG'EN BUCKNER'S WICKETS!!!!!!!!!
...
...
What were we talking about? ... Oh yeah, Clemens. ...
It wasn't his fault, he did what he had to do to win a World Series.
George
|
63.665 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Herring, SS-283, In Memoriam | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:56 | 5 |
| If 200+ wins w/no WS or 175 wins and a WS were valid criteria, then
there's a lot of pitchers who are in the HoF who wouldn't be there.
'Saw
|
63.666 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 06 1995 11:58 | 7 |
|
Um...
Who?
Joe (not remembering many HoF w/ < 200 wins, other than relievers...)
|
63.667 | Wake up Groaner!! | SHRMSG::GALVIN | knockemdownspinemrounheygobowling | Tue Jun 06 1995 12:01 | 15 |
| re; Groaner
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." 4 lines 6-JUN-1995 07:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribe wins again, what else is new. [[[[ This is getting boring.]]]]
Hersheiser with the shut out. The big three on the pitching staff
should be able to carry them to WS victory.
And you call yourself a FAN???? If it's getting too boring, jump on
the Yankees wagon. BTW, the Sox also won last night, and it ain't
BORING!!!!!
RTG
|
63.668 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Herring, SS-283, In Memoriam | Tue Jun 06 1995 15:03 | 17 |
| > Um...
>
> Who?
>
> Joe (not remembering many HoF w/ < 200 wins, other than relievers...)
I dunno. I'd have to look it up. I'm betting that some of the early pitchers
who are in there don't have that criteria.
If I get a chance tonight (which is iffy since I have a ton of other things
to do) I'll browse through Total Baseball and see what I can come
up with......
'Saw
|
63.669 | So, how's that KoD thing work, anyways | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Tue Jun 06 1995 15:11 | 6 |
| The Clevescum Injuns, my favorite A(lmost) (L)eague team.
Go tribe
JaKe
|
63.670 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 06 1995 15:14 | 22 |
| >> NY on the other hand seems to be suffering from high expectations.
> Who knows; the shortterm window of opportunity may have closed on the
> Yankees. Wouldn't that be a shame. There is some advancing age
> and/or terminal injury problems on this team with key players like Key,
> Tartabull, Boggs, Mattingly and a bunch of good role players in the
> 31-32 range.
The Yanks aren't suffering from "high expectations" or "advancing age".
They're suffering from not having their ace pitching every 5th day,
and having an awful early-season slump, which won't end with guys
like Eenhoorn, Silvestri, and Jeter in the everyday lineup, or 3/5s
of the rotation being made up of Hitchcock-Pettite-Rivera.
One part of the team that has not met expectations is the bullpen,
where Ausanio has proven to be a one-year wonder, and Wickman (5.+),
Howe (9.+) and Wetteland (4.+?) haven't been able to keep runs off
the board.
As a Yankee fan I'm more concerned about not being able to play 3
consecutive very good years (with nothing to show from the previous
2) than I am about them heading toward some kind of rebuilding program.
|
63.671 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 06 1995 15:17 | 13 |
|
HoF prediction for the day...
Of the current Indians, only the following will eventually make the HoF:
Carlos Baerga
Manny Ramirez
Dennis Martinez
Eddie Murray
Dave Winfield
Julian Tavarez
Joe
|
63.672 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 06 1995 15:22 | 9 |
|
> The Yanks aren't suffering from "high expectations" or "advancing age".
Yes, they are. Well, advancing age at least; nearly all of the
Yankee's talent is past their prime, which hurts in two ways:
they're more prone to injury, and they're in a general pattern of
decline (at least for the hitters).
Joe
|
63.673 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 06 1995 15:47 | 22 |
| RE <<< Note 63.670 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>The Yanks aren't suffering from "high expectations" or "advancing age".
>They're suffering from not having their ace pitching every 5th day,
>and having an awful early-season slump, which won't end with guys
>like Eenhoorn, Silvestri, and Jeter in the everyday lineup, or 3/5s
>of the rotation being made up of Hitchcock-Pettite-Rivera.
I'm not sure it's that simple. The Red Sox have managed to both get into and
hold onto 1st place without their Ace pitcher and with a bunch of guys on the
DL.
My girlfriend's son works in New York and this past weekend he told me that
the New York press is starting to get on the Yankees for not living up to their
preseason expectations.
If those guys don't start playing up to spec it's going to be a long hot
summer of merciless bashing from both their owner and the press. The last
place I'd want to be these days is the Yankees locker room. That's going to
become one tense place, with or without George Castanzia.
George
|
63.674 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Herring, SS-283, In Memoriam | Tue Jun 06 1995 15:55 | 14 |
| >
> My girlfriend's son works in New York and this past weekend he told me that
>the New York press is starting to get on the Yankees for not living up to their
>preseason expectations.
>
You should hear the Yankees fans on WFAN of late. It's a pleasure to listen
to them whine and whine and whine.
Almost as bad as Mets fans.....
8^)
|
63.675 | Yes, one of life's pleasures; Yanks in the cellar... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:01 | 10 |
|
> You should hear the Yankees fans on WFAN of late. It's a pleasure to listen
> to them whine and whine and whine.
As one of Imus' stooges might put it in his parody of sportstalk
radio: "Yo Mad Dog what up wit dat bum Maddinglee?"
glenn
|
63.676 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:05 | 30 |
63.677 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:07 | 2 |
63.678 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:08 | 6 |
63.679 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Bob Backlund for President? | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:11 | 3 |
|
Excuse alert #984...
|
63.680 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:12 | 17 |
|
I agree with .676. Hershiser's 67 scoreless innings is
the flashy stat to get him over the hump - I'm not sure
the total wins and W/L % would do it. And I *really*
like the way Dennis Martinez put it back together after
his alcohol problems. I really like watching him pitch.
HoF? Maybe, maybe not, but he'd have my vote. (I like
guys who aren't afraid to pitch inside.)
RE: .675
Julian Tavarez?????????
I suppose we should just induct every guy who
went 15-6 or better in AAA.
He looks like a whip when he's pitching, though.
And he *should* be in the rotation.
|
63.681 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:19 | 34 |
|
> I agree with .676. Hershiser's 67 scoreless innings is
> the flashy stat to get him over the hump - I'm not sure
> the total wins and W/L % would do it.
I'm sure his W/L and win% won't be enough; in fact, I'm reasonably
sure that even with the flashy stat he won't make it without a
nice close to his career.
> And I *really* like the way Dennis Martinez put it back together after
> his alcohol problems. I really like watching him pitch. HoF? Maybe,
> maybe not, but he'd have my vote. (I like guys who aren't afraid to
> pitch inside.)
I think the fact that he's finishing his career so strong will be
the edge that gets him in. It does two things: it gives his career
numbers a nice boost, and it leaves a positive image on the voters.
> RE: .675
> Julian Tavarez?????????
Yeah...
> I suppose we should just induct every guy who
> went 15-6 or better in AAA.
Not at all; I wasn't arguing that these guys _should_ go into the
HoF (I think, eventually, Thome will have a _great_ argument, but
still won't make it), just predicting that they _will_. Yes,
Tavarez is a long shot, and is nowhere close at this point (and
won't be worth arguing about for 10 years or so), but he's as good
a bet as any other 22 year old pitcher right now...
Joe
|
63.683 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:20 | 5 |
63.684 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:21 | 15 |
| Remember once again that it's the "Hall of Fame", not the "Hall of Really
Great Baseball Players".
Roger Clemens has been a major star throughout the 80's and 90's starting
several all-star games and playing the role of the franchise player around
which the team is built. He's been the go to guy that's pulled them out of
losing streaks during pennant and division championship years and he's had
extended periods in which he's overpowered American League hitters.
And! He holds the all time record for strikeouts in a game at 20.
He's a lock. If he walked away today he'd be a shoe in for the Hall of
Fame.
George
|
63.685 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:23 | 4 |
63.686 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:25 | 4 |
| I agree, Oral's scoreless string and that World Series he won practically
single handed make him about as sure a bet as you'll ever see.
George
|
63.687 | Roger is far from a sure thing | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Celtics coach? I'm available! | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:40 | 6 |
| Roger's 179 wins make him far from a lock. His mediocre postseason
record and relative lack of success since 1992 put him in a tenuous
position re. the Hall. I think he needs at least two more solid years
before he can receive serious consideration.
NAZZ
|
63.688 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:41 | 10 |
|
>> <<< Note 63.681 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is that along the same lines as "From Zanzibar to Barkley Square"????
Inquiring mindless and all that SLOF
JaKe
|
63.689 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:42 | 8 |
| Well as I understand it, the only way he'll retire is if the Red Sox win the
World Series. I assume that means if they win and he's part of it. So if that
happens, there's his World Series success. If not, then he's get a few more
years.
Either way, he'll probably get in the hall.
George
|
63.690 | 300+ win pitchers Niekro, Sutton not even in yet... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:52 | 11 |
|
I suspect that the only way that Dennis Martinez will be getting into
the HOF is with a full-admission ticket. There's just not enough there
beyond the longevity. No 20-win seasons, marginal career ERA, winning
percentage (wasted many seasons with very good Baltimore teams). He'll
need a few more very strong seasons at minimum. Does have the perfect
game to push him over the top if he can get into the 275-win range,
though.
glenn
|
63.691 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:53 | 3 |
| >From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls
Hey, ho, where'd you go, Ohio?
|
63.692 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Jun 06 1995 16:56 | 7 |
|
Maybe I have the wrong Martinez, but I thought he had a number of 2.xx
era years. Regardless of win %, if you have an era like that, you
deserve to be in the HOF.
Marc
|
63.693 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 06 1995 17:07 | 13 |
|
>>From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls
>Hey, ho, where'd you go, Ohio?
Quite right. (From a Pretenders song, for those who (a) don't
know, and (b) care.) One of the few times you'll hear my
hometown mentioned.
Joe (Proud (mostly) to be from Cuyahoga Falls, OH, where men are
men, women are women, pop is pop, tennis shoes aren't Tennis
shoes, and the piece of grass between the sidewalk and the
street is the devil strip.)
|
63.694 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Tue Jun 06 1995 17:12 | 10 |
|
>>Joe (Proud (mostly) to be from Cuyahoga Falls, OH, where men are
>>men,
And sheep are scared.
(8^)*
Jake
|
63.695 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 06 1995 17:22 | 5 |
|
You're most welcome for the setup line, Jake.
Joe (Who could point out that there aren't any sheep in CFO, but
wouldn't want to see the reply after that.)
|
63.696 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Tue Jun 06 1995 17:29 | 6 |
| Scared em all away, eh??
thanks fer the setup
JaKe
|
63.697 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 07 1995 07:58 | 4 |
63.698 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Herring, SS-283, In Memoriam | Wed Jun 07 1995 09:18 | 7 |
| What we used to say about Hebron where I lived was:
Hebron, where men are men, sheep are scared and
women pee standing up......
'Saw
|
63.699 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 07 1995 09:33 | 7 |
| > Same old story, Tribe wins again, now 26-10. Best record in
> baseball. Question now is, will they win 100 games in the
> strike shortened season?
I'd guess they will, yes.
Joe
|
63.700 | So, is Albert still corking his bat or what? | SALEM::DODA | Chairman of the Bored | Wed Jun 07 1995 10:37 | 0 |
63.701 | Team of the 1990's | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Wed Jun 07 1995 10:55 | 6 |
| re.697
Anything less then 100 wins by the most powerful lineup since the 1927
Yankees would be a major disappointment. Plus with the top farm system
anything less then 3 World Series championships before 2000 would be a
choke job.
|
63.702 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 07 1995 10:58 | 17 |
| > I suspect that the only way that Dennis Martinez will be getting into
> the HOF is with a full-admission ticket.
> (wasted many seasons with very good Baltimore teams).
He was the weakest pitcher on the Orioles' staff. As Glenn points out,
Martinez has done nothing to distinguish himself. He's a good pitcher,
period.
As for Clemens, does anyone have his year-to-year numbers ? The 3 Cy's
are big, but I think he dropped to "above average" pretty quickly. I
don't think he's a lock. Whenever I think about pitchers and the HoF
I start by comparing them to Ron Guidry. Gator ain't gonna get in,
and most cite his lack of "aggregate" numbers as the reason...he simply
didn't have a long enough career. But the 1.28 ERA, the 25-3, the Cy,
and those WS wins are all notable.
|
63.703 | < 200 pitchers | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Jun 07 1995 11:06 | 8 |
| Two pitchers with less than 200 wins are Dizzy Dean and Sandy Koufax,
both with less than Clemens. But Roger doesn't quite stack up with
these two, a pair (at prime) for many an all time all-star team.
Clemens matches up well with Catfish Hunter but he had a pretty good
post-season record, a big plus to today's minds. I think Nazz had it
right on the button which shows his baseball knowledge well ahead of
his basketball malpredictions.
|
63.704 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 07 1995 11:14 | 10 |
|
> Plus with the top farm system
I hate to say it (actually, I _really_ _really_ hate to say it), but
the Indians no longer have the top fram system, or anything close to
it. They have some decent players in the minors - even a few posible
stars such as Enrique Wilson & David Bell - but the number of position
player prospects has dropped off significantly.
Joe
|
63.705 | Clemens' ERA, winning pct. superlative... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 07 1995 11:33 | 34 |
|
>> As for Clemens, does anyone have his year-to-year numbers ? The 3 Cy's
>> are big, but I think he dropped to "above average" pretty quickly.
> Clemens matches up well with Catfish Hunter but he had a pretty good
> post-season record, a big plus to today's minds. I think Nazz had it
> right on the button which shows his baseball knowledge well ahead of
> his basketball malpredictions.
Nope, and uh-uh. You're all selling Clemens short to this point in
his career. There's been only _one_ full season that wasn't "well
above average". Clemens isn't done yet and he's got only 326 starts
under his belt so it's not like he "should" have 250 wins or something
by now. But in getting to the ~175-W number he's done as well as just
about anyone ever has, with a lifetime winning percentage right there
with Koufax and Dean (who played for better teams overall):
Year Team W L PCT ERA G SV IP BB SO
1984 Boston-AL 9 4 .692 4.32 21 0 133.1 29 126
1985 Boston-AL 7 5 .583 3.29 15 0 98.1 37 74
1986 Boston-AL 24 4 .857 2.48 33 0 254.0 67 238
1987 Boston-AL 20 9 .690 2.97 36 0 281.2 83 256
1988 Boston-AL 18 12 .600 2.93 35 0 264.0 62 291
1989 Boston-AL 17 11 .607 3.13 35 0 253.1 93 230
1990 Boston-AL 21 6 .778 1.93 31 0 228.1 54 209
1991 Boston-AL 18 10 .643 2.62 35 0 271.1 65 241
1992 Boston-AL 18 11 .621 2.41 32 0 246.2 62 208
1993 Boston-AL 11 14 .440 4.46 29 0 191.2 67 160
1994 Boston-AL 9 7 .563 2.85 24 0 170.2 71 168
Career Totals: 172 93 .649 2.93 326 0 2393.1 690 2201
|
63.706 | Go Indians, Go Yankees | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Wed Jun 07 1995 11:42 | 6 |
| Joe,
With all of these great young pitchers and OF's they have more talent
then everyone else. They are the #1 Franchise in baseball. Only the
Yankees are close.
Mike
|
63.707 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Get Well Mickey | Wed Jun 07 1995 12:01 | 9 |
|
Clemens is the best pitcher I have seen in my lifetime. Better
than Seaver, better than Ryan, better than Sutton. I think he should
go into the HOF. The only thing that may deter this is a few 6-14 years
but I don't think he'll do that.
Chap
|
63.708 | Other pitchers have much better stats and are not in the Hall | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Celtics coach? I'm available! | Wed Jun 07 1995 12:14 | 17 |
| Clemens has played 11 years in the bigs. He's had seven excellent
years and four mediocre ones, including his last two. He has not
performed well in post season. He will not get into the Hall unless he
has at least two more excellent seasons.
Compare Clemens' stats with these, a pitcher who has not gotten
anywhere near the Hall of Fame consideration he deserves:
YRS W L PCT ERA G GS CG IP H BB SO Shutouts
19 229 172 .571 3.30 573 484 187 3485 3075 1104 2416 49
That pitcher is the great
LUIS TIANT!
NAZZ
|
63.709 | Unlike Roger | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Celtics coach? I'm available! | Wed Jun 07 1995 12:15 | 3 |
| And Tiant is 3-0 in postseason, including a shutout.
NAZZ
|
63.710 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 07 1995 12:19 | 9 |
|
Nazz, how was Clemens' 1994 "mediocre" (or his 1985 for that matter)?
Because all the players went on strike? Because the Sox were once
again pathetic? The fact is that Clemens was just nipped at the wire
for the ERA title by a guy who just put in the minimum innings over a
partial, partial season. That ain't "mediocre".
glenn
|
63.711 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jun 07 1995 12:21 | 9 |
| I think you might want to look again at Clemens post season record.
At least in '86 he had a critical win game 6 of the ALCS then he won game 2
of the World Series and left game 6 a 2-2 tie (at least he did his job).
And he did all that with a blister that made it almost impossible for him
to throw a curve.
George
|
63.712 | No comparison | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Celtics coach? I'm available! | Wed Jun 07 1995 12:32 | 19 |
| What's your definition of 9-7 Glenn? It certainly isn't excellent!
In 1986, Clemens was 1-1 with a 4.37 ERA in the LCS, and 0-0 with a
3.18 in the WS. That was after going 24-4 with a 2.48 ERA in the
regular season.
Tiant, on the other hand, pitched one game in the 1975 LCS, went the
route, and gave up only 3 hits and no earned runs, getting the 7-1 win.
In the WS, he started three games. In game 1, he pitched a complete
game, 5 hit shutout against the Big Red Machine. He even singled and
scored the first run! In game four, he again went the distance,
despite not having his best stuff. He gutted out a 5-4 win, throwing
an amazing 163 pitches! In game six, he went seven innings and was
not involved in the decision.
In sum, Tiant pitched a complete game in all but one of his post-season
appearances, and the Sox won every game. Not too shabby.
NAZZ
|
63.713 | Let's be consistent... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 07 1995 12:37 | 8 |
|
> What's your definition of 9-7 Glenn? It certainly isn't excellent!
It's within .010 of the Great Luis Tiant's _lifetime_ winning
percentage, pitching for a bad team...
glenn
|
63.714 | he'll get in, but he can't be considered a "lock" | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 07 1995 12:46 | 7 |
| > Career Totals: 172 93 .649 2.93 326 0 2393.1 690 2201
^^^^
That ERA is his best argument, so far. 3 20-win seasons isn't superlative,
and you can't convince me that he's been playing for lousy teams. Boston
won the AL East 3 times between '86-90. Mel Stottlemeyer won 20/season
with much worse teams than any Clemens has pitched for.
|
63.715 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Wed Jun 07 1995 13:30 | 26 |
|
In Rogers 4 so called mediocre years he didn't have complete
seasons. In '84 I believe he started in the minor leagues. In '85
didn't he have shoulder surgery? I'd call '93 a bad year, he did
finish the season on the DL. In '94 is ERA was below 3.00 and he
averaged 7 innings pitched per start. The '94 gave him no run support
and the bullpen blew 8 Wins for Roger. Clemens easily could have been
17-7 last year, but ended up at 9-7.
Roger needs another two or three 15 win seasons. Plus keep his
career ERA under 3.00. Another plus for Roger is that over his entire
career he has averaged (2393/326) = 7.3 innings per start, with good
strikeout to walk ratio's. The guy has been a work horse .
I doubt you will ever see a pitcher pitch for 20 years as a
starting pitcher ever again. The so called rules for getting into
the HOF have to change some time. You can't compare the '80s and '90's
with the '40s and '50s.
In fact I believe if Babe Ruth was playing today. He would only
be an average player or a failure. Why do I think that? I don't believe
the pitchers in Ruth's era threw the ball faster then 85 M.P.H. With
most thorowing in the high '70s. Or threw more then 2 pitches
(Fastball/Curve). Babe Ruth supposedly swung a bat that weighed 60
oz's. He swings that bat against a Roger Clemens and he strikes out
9 outta 10 times. I don't think anybody in major league baseball uses
a bat. That weighs more then 40 oz today.
Ron
|
63.716 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 07 1995 13:38 | 7 |
63.717 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 07 1995 13:40 | 5 |
63.718 | :-) | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 07 1995 13:41 | 3 |
63.719 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 07 1995 13:44 | 24 |
63.720 | .650 W-L is the goods... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 07 1995 13:46 | 18 |
|
>> Career Totals: 172 93 .649 2.93 326 0 2393.1 690 2201
> ^^^^
>
> That ERA is his best argument, so far.
I like the winning percentage even more. Granted, a 2.93 ERA pitching
half his games in Fenway is incredible, but the winning percentage
always has its built-in point of reference: .500, where one team always
wins, and one loses. Playing conditions, pitching rotation theories
change, but the W-L outcome remains the same. Sure, there are
extenuating circumstances such as quality of team, quality of bullpen
(as Billte pointed out to me Clemens generally hasn't had a good one
behind him), but over the long haul a .650 winning percentage (even on
a slightly above-average Red Sox over 1984-94) is top of the line...
glenn
|
63.721 | Team of the late 90's | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Wed Jun 07 1995 13:54 | 13 |
| RE .716
Paul,
Where did I say that you said it? Are you telling me that they don't?
With all of the young pitching talent in the farm they have enough arms
there for almost 2 ML teams. And with some of the other talent they
have only the Yankees right now are close to having the young talent all
through their organization. Like I said anything less the 3 WS rings in
the next 5 years would be a huge disappointment. They are in the same
category now that the Braves were in 3 years ago.
Mike
|
63.722 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 07 1995 13:58 | 8 |
63.723 | The most talented team since the 1978 Red Sox | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Wed Jun 07 1995 14:26 | 11 |
| Oh come on Paul, your selling this organization short. They have more
good arms in their system then anyone. Why else would people keep
coming to them looking for young pitching. They have an abundance of
young arms and even have Greg Olson down on the farm almost ready to
to come back and be a 30-35 saves/season closer.
And although the Thome's, Ramirez's etc are now superstars ( or close
to it) they still have more coming thru the system but not quite in the
numbers they once did. All of yous Indian fans should sit back, relax
and enjoy the great times ahead. They have the most talent around.
Mike
|
63.724 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 07 1995 14:34 | 19 |
|
OK, Mike...
Just _who_ do the Indians have? You mentioned OF and P as the
positions the Indians are strong in through the system - so just
who are you talking about? Legitimate prospects, now, not 25 year
olds tearing up AA in their third try...
RE: Clemens, and wins...
1) Over the course of a season, a pitchers won/loss record is almost
completely independent of how well he pitched.
2) Over the course of a career, won/loss record _is_ meaningful;
Clemens wins, w/l %, and ERA are an excellent argument for the
HoF right now; Tiant's aren't as good, but have made him a
marginal candidate, so shouldn't _better_ numbers be a HoFer?
Joe
|
63.725 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 07 1995 16:04 | 15 |
63.726 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jun 07 1995 16:09 | 5 |
| Ferguson Genkins (how ever that's spelled), now there was a pitcher.
What ever wins he got, look what he had to work with.
George
|
63.727 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 08 1995 08:03 | 5 |
63.728 | many :*)) | AD::HEATH | Don't get to excited yet | Thu Jun 08 1995 08:19 | 6 |
|
All they could manage off that pathetic Tiger staff is 3 runs.
What a joke of an offense.
Jerry
|
63.729 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 08 1995 08:27 | 8 |
63.730 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Thu Jun 08 1995 08:56 | 15 |
| Joe,
What I based my statements on are reports from Baseball America and
Baseball Weekly last winter that had the Indians farm system rated very
highly. Pitching was listed as the deepest part of the organization.
Omar Ramirez and David Bell were listed as up and coming hitters that
could soon be in Cleveland. Most of the young pitching that has come up
thru the system still bounce back and forth between Charlotte and
Cleveland which is why I think of some of them still in the minors and
developing.
I think that right now the Indians have more young developing players
in the Majors and Minors then anyone. The way they have constructed this
team should be a model to all of MLB. They should be in contention and
fighting for the World Series for the rest of the decade.
Mike
|
63.731 | | 6214::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 08 1995 09:10 | 5 |
|
Someone said it last year so it must be true. Yes, maybe last year
but not this year. Bell is definitely a prospect, Omar Ramirez is
not. BA regularly lists the minor league ratings and I don't think
Cleveland is in the top 5 any more.
|
63.732 | | 6214::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 08 1995 09:31 | 58 |
|
Mike,
> What I based my statements on are reports from Baseball America and
> Baseball Weekly last winter that had the Indians farm system rated very
> highly.
Unfortunately, BA & BW are a little behind, just as they were behind
when the system was on the upswing. It's not empty, but it's no
longer among the best.
> Pitching was listed as the deepest part of the organization.
That's certainly true.
> Omar Ramirez and David Bell were listed as up and coming hitters that
> could soon be in Cleveland.
Omar Ramirez is on the border between being a career minor leaguer
and a 4th/5th outfielder in the majors for a few years. Bell will
be a major league player.
> Most of the young pitching that has come up
> thru the system still bounce back and forth between Charlotte and
> Cleveland which is why I think of some of them still in the minors and
> developing.
Actually, about the only guys bouncing right now are Ogea and Shuey
(well, I suppose you could note Clark, though I think of that more
as rehab than anything else).
> I think that right now the Indians have more young developing players
> in the Majors and Minors then anyone.
Ah - I see some of the source of confusion now. The Tribe does have
at least three players in the majors who haven't hit their peak yet -
Baerga, Thome, and Ramirez. If you look at them as prospects (which
isn't really a bad thing to do, I suppose) then the system looks much
better, since all three have legitimate shots at HoF careers right
now.
> The way they have constructed this team should be a model to all of
> MLB. They should be in contention and fighting for the World Series
> for the rest of the decade.
So long as they don't start trading off the _real_ prospects, I agree.
I don't mind when we send a DiPoto or Mlicki off (well, at least when
we get someone good like Burnitz in return), but if the Indians start
considering dealing guys like Thome, Bell, and Ramirez, the good
times could end very quickly.
The Tribe brass has yet to show how well they can sustain success.
The Indians are going to have some real financial questions soon -
while 5 superstars can be payed for when some are years away from
free agency, it's not going to be that long before the Indians are
going to have to decide who they can afford to keep.
Joe
|
63.733 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Thu Jun 08 1995 10:03 | 21 |
|
>Ah - I see some of the source of confusion now. The Tribe does have
>at least three players in the majors who haven't hit their peak yet-
>Baerga, Thome, and Ramirez. If you look at them as prospects
>(which isn't really a bad thing to do, I suppose) then the system looks
>much better, since all three have legitimate shots at HoF careers right
>now.
Which is my point. And throw in Belle and Lofton. If Bell comes along
(I didn't realize that O Ramirez had fallen from grace) and Sandy
Alomar ever stays healthy there won't be a better regular lineup
anywhere. Also isn't Burnitz tearing up AAA pitching and hitting over
.300? If the pitching continues to develop your solid for the rest of
the decade.
|
63.734 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jun 08 1995 10:11 | 4 |
| > Baerga, Thome, and Ramirez. If you look at them as prospects
Baerga has been playing too long in the majors to be considered a prospect.
He's in his peak years now, age-wise.
|
63.735 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 08 1995 10:33 | 22 |
|
>> Baerga, Thome, and Ramirez. If you look at them as prospects
> Baerga has been playing too long in the majors to be considered a prospect.
> He's in his peak years now, age-wise.
Well, that all depends, and that's where Mike & I were out of sync.
Even given how long Baerga has been in the major leagues (he was a
semi-regular in 1990), he still hasn't seen the age of 27 that tends
to mark the peak of hitters careers, so there still is some small hope
of continued improvement. Belle and Lofton are different matters
altogether, though.
w.r.t Burnitz
While he is doing well at AAA, I don't think of him as a prospect
either. He's 26; he's not likely to show any real improvement
from this point on.
Which is fine; he'll make a nice addition, particularly at DH.
Joe
|
63.736 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 08 1995 10:46 | 6 |
63.737 | Another one bites the dust! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Thu Jun 08 1995 17:35 | 33 |
|
Hi Guys,
I'm Baaack! I know I've been gone for too long but will
try as hard as possible to enter something in here at least weekly.
This new scheduel I'm on really sucks! Not much time for much. At
any rate, I see the ICEMAN has been keeping things going though.
How about the Tribe! Best record in the Majors. I really
don't think I've ever seen this before in my short life. Kind of
strange......but, I'll get used to it real quick!
This has got to be the best lineup ever. No lead is safe
against the Indians! I've got to get my dish hooked up again. I can't
stand that dam CNN crap, wait and wait and wait for an update. I swear
the game stood still in the bottom of the 9th for over 45 minutes
before going into the 10 inning. I figured for sure the tribe was
going to win the game in the 9th....then, the Final came up.
CLEVELAND 3 - DETROIT 2
TAKE OUT THE BROOMS...SWEEP, SWEEP, SWEEP
Get out of here! Will ya....
On to Millwalkee now.....keep up the hard work!
The Chief...
WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
My Indian flag should be here by the middle of next week.....GO TRIBE!
|
63.738 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 08 1995 18:59 | 5 |
63.739 | JUST KEEP ON WINNING | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Thu Jun 08 1995 19:44 | 13 |
|
W A H O O GO TRIBE!
I WANA GO HOME!
ICEMAN, be sure and let me know when you go on your next excursion
back to O-H-I-O, I wana see the INDIANS at home!
The Chief
W A H O O !
|
63.740 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Thu Jun 08 1995 20:21 | 6 |
| Oh cripes sake, HAL's back.
No NOTE is safe, now,.
JaKe
|
63.741 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 08 1995 22:55 | 4 |
63.742 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Fri Jun 09 1995 00:43 | 5 |
| I cain only wish somebody forcefully gives you a battery-acid enema in
repayment for waking up HAL, Groaner.
JaKe
|
63.743 | these 9th inning wins are really getting boring | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 09 1995 08:38 | 23 |
63.744 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 09 1995 08:38 | 5 |
63.745 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 09 1995 09:27 | 10 |
63.746 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Fri Jun 09 1995 09:50 | 14 |
| > If its not bad enough that the tribe is 28-10, i'm in here pumping them
> up every day and now I got Hal back in here...
No problem with you pumping them up every day, but it's sad that they have
to go 28-10 to get Hal out of the woodwork...
> but Grimsley has been
> dropped from the rotation and Ogea is starting tonight. Heck, they
> could go undefeated from here on out.
Doubtful, but it's a step in the right direction towards that goal. :-)
Grimsley is one of those guys who looks good during warmups, *then* gets
shelled...
|
63.747 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 09 1995 09:57 | 9 |
|
You know, I'm starting to have nightmares about the Indians running
away with the Central by continuing their streak of late inning
comebacks, facing the wild card Oakland team in the playoffs,
Dennis Martinez being told not to pitch to Mark McGwire, throwing the
ball into Lake Erie if he has to, and one of his pitches getting
intercepted by McGwire's bat...
Joe
|
63.748 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 09 1995 10:02 | 8 |
63.749 | exit | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Fri Jun 09 1995 10:44 | 14 |
|
Who plays who in the playoffs isn't decided until the season
officially ends. The Division winner with the best record plays the
Wildcard team. With the other two divison winners playing each other.
The teams with the best records are the home teams. Except in the
League championship, where a Wildcard team can't be the home team. The
Division winner is always the home team against the Wildcard team.
I believe they scrapped the alternating years for the World Series
also. Whoever has the best record is the home team. Which is the
way it should be. Now that the rules used (DH/NO DH) are designated by
which league they are in.
Ron
|
63.750 | or maybe you'll be spared by Fehr and Orza ! | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 09 1995 11:01 | 4 |
| >... and anyone who doesn't realize that its destiny for the Indians this
>year, check out inning #9.
We all know Cleveland's destiny. I hope for your sake it happens swiftly...
|
63.751 | HO HUM | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Fri Jun 09 1995 12:00 | 15 |
|
W A H O O O ! ! !
Top of the ninth.......Indians down by 2 runs.......Visquell up to
bat.....single.....Carlos up.....single.....men on 1st and second, no
outs......ALBERT BELL at the plate.....smack.....double...two runs
score...tie game....one batter later, HOME RUN!!!!! GAME OVER.....
TRIBE WINS AGAIN AT THEIR LAST AT BAT!
WAHOOOOOOOOO!
|
63.752 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Fri Jun 09 1995 12:04 | 7 |
|
<sigh>
At least Joe H. and Groaner contribute some reasonable analysis and don't
enter monotonous ranting...
Is your right-hand ring finger crazy-glued to the "." key?
|
63.753 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Fri Jun 09 1995 12:12 | 16 |
|
>>p.p.s. JaKe, how bout those pirates
They're right where they're supposed to be, in the dumper.
When your pitching staff is a cross between AA and AAA, and the defense
sucks, and ya cain't hit the ball hard, and you have no speed on the
basepaths, and, well, I could go on and on forever on the weaknesses
the Pirates have brought on by the current owners consortium's
continued lack of infusing money into the team and paying REAL players
to play here, but I won't.
they suck, that says it all.
JaKe
|
63.754 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 09 1995 12:16 | 8 |
| Actually seeing the excitement from Cleveland fans is part of the fun. I
remember reading last summer about how people in Cleveland were really psyched
about the team and people started comparing it to 1954. Back then everyone was
talking about the Tribe, schools let kids out for the World Series and everyone
went bananas.
Can't really hate a town that loves baseball,
George
|
63.755 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Fri Jun 09 1995 12:18 | 12 |
|
>> Can't really hate a town that loves baseball,
I see you've never spent any time in Clevescum, right George. What
with it's burning rivers, and it being the world's only inhabited raw
sewage dump, with the painted sh_t they call a field in the old
stadium....
Place is the dump of the world.
JaKe
|
63.756 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Fri Jun 09 1995 13:16 | 12 |
| >If its not bad enough that the tribe is 28-10, i'm in here pumping
>them up every day and now I got Hal back in here... but Grimsley has
>been dropped from the rotation and Ogea is starting tonight. Heck, they
>could go undefeated from here on out.
Paul,
Does that mean that anything less then a perfect record by th Indians
for the rest of the year would be a CHOKE?
End of note
|
63.757 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Herring, SS-283, In Memoriam | Fri Jun 09 1995 13:19 | 15 |
| I was in Cleveland once and found it be a very nice city.
Never actually been IN Pittsburgh, but that part of Pennsylvania is
nice too.
I've never really understood the big LDUC between Cleveland and Pittsburgh
people.
YOU guys wanna see a dump of a city, take a look at Bridgeport Ct. It's the
armpit of the world.....
'Saw
|
63.758 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 09 1995 14:05 | 4 |
63.759 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 09 1995 14:28 | 28 |
|
JaKe,
> When your pitching staff is a cross between AA and AAA,
Oh, come on - the Pirates have a reasonably good staff, they're
just young.
> and the defense sucks,
I'll take your word for it.
> and ya cain't hit the ball hard,
Aude can. Bell certainly has before. Cummings can hit. Garcia's
OK. King's hitting well. Al Martin's a fine player with some power.
Merced might not hit HR, but he's got some pop. Parent has hit well
this year. It's not great, but they aren't completely without
hitters.
> and you have no speed on the basepaths,
No speedsters, maybe, but stolen bases aren't worth much anyway...
The Pirates, for all their problems, aren't _that_ bad. It wouldn't
take _that_ much for the team to improve dramatically next year.
Joe
|
63.760 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Fri Jun 09 1995 16:08 | 29 |
|
>>Oh, come on - the Pirates have a reasonably good staff, they're
>>just young.
Well, for all they have, potential wise, they suck. Paul Wagner is
1-8, with an ERA in the stratosphere, and the guy gives up first inning
runs by the handful. The rest of the staff, short of Denny Neagle, has
been between mediocre and abysmal, too.
>>Aude can. Bell certainly has before. Cummings can hit. Garcia's
>>OK. King's hitting well. Al Martin's a fine player with some power.
>>Merced might not hit HR, but he's got some pop. Parent has hit well
>>this year. It's not great, but they aren't completely without
>>hitters.
King is the only one who's been hitting with any consistency this
season, so far, and he's been driving in runs but nobody else has been
hitting, other than the spotty game or two.
>>The Pirates, for all their problems, aren't _that_ bad. It wouldn't
>>take _that_ much for the team to improve dramatically next year.
It wouldn't take that much for them to go into the dumper further,
either nexted year. BUT, this year, the team, as a whole sucks.
JaKe
|
63.761 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 09 1995 16:31 | 5 |
63.762 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 09 1995 16:42 | 9 |
63.763 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sat Jun 10 1995 08:19 | 10 |
63.764 | Greg Gagne :== Bucky &*%%^ Dent | AD::HEATH | Don't get to excited yet | Sat Jun 10 1995 08:32 | 4 |
|
I remember saying the same thing in 1978
|
63.765 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sat Jun 10 1995 16:05 | 3 |
63.766 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Jun 11 1995 10:05 | 3 |
63.767 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Jun 11 1995 10:09 | 11 |
63.768 | SNAW - situation normal, another win | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Jun 11 1995 19:49 | 2 |
63.769 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Sun Jun 11 1995 23:55 | 13 |
|
You know, if the Indains manage to get Drabek & Hudek for some small
price, they really will be bigtime favorites, and anything less than a
WS appearance _will_ be a choke. (I'm not convinced that a WS loss
to the Braves would be a choke; Maddux & company are just too good
to _expect_ to win against, no matter how good a lineup you have.)
BTW, the Indians now have the longest streak this season of not losing
two consecutive games, taking over from the Phillies (whose streak
_is_ more noteworthy, though, having started with the first day of the
season).
Joe
|
63.770 | lets see if Belle is man enough to get 400 tb's Rice was | AD::HEATH | Don't get to excited yet | Mon Jun 12 1995 07:39 | 5 |
|
Paul....
I'd take the '78 sox. Or a better offensive team the '77 sox
|
63.771 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 12 1995 08:46 | 7 |
63.772 | Wrong team | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Mon Jun 12 1995 09:29 | 8 |
| >Rumors still around Cleveland getting Hudek and or Drabek from
>Pittsburgh. I'd gladly take Drabek, depending on what they have
>to give up in return
Man Houston is going to be Po'd about this since both play with the
Astros. Rumor is that anyone who takes Drabek's or Swindell's contracts
can get Hudek as well. Boston is also interested.
|
63.773 | Ken Ryan blowing one by Joey Belle to end it... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jun 12 1995 13:49 | 10 |
|
> You know, I'm starting to have nightmares about the Indians running
> away with the Central by continuing their streak of late inning
> comebacks, facing the wild card Oakland team in the playoffs,
That was my thought, except replace Oakland with Boston doing the
upsetting in those cheesy 5-game sub-playoff series...
glenn
|
63.774 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 12 1995 17:59 | 2 |
63.775 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:06 | 12 |
63.776 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:14 | 14 |
63.777 | Both should be on the team period | AD::HEATH | Don't get to excited yet | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:27 | 8 |
|
Paul don't get worked up about the some-star game. Cleveland is a
small market and like Boston problably hasn't even turned in any
ballots yet. When Thome and Vaughn both don't make the team we can
whine about it together.
Jerry
|
63.778 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:53 | 5 |
63.779 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 13 1995 09:20 | 10 |
|
As ridiculous as the situation is for the Indians hitters, I saw
one thing that really surprised me - Valentin wasn't even on the list
at SS. You know, between Boston and Cleveland you could very easily
come up with a lineup that would beat the top vote getters more often
than not... an infield of Vaughn, Baerga, Valentin, and Thome; Belle,
Lofton, and Ramirez in the OF; MacFarlane behind the plate & Murray
DHing.
Joe
|
63.780 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 13 1995 10:28 | 14 |
| Remember, it's an all STAR game, not a best player game.
The fans vote for who they want to see in the all-star game and that may
or may not be the guy who's having the hot year or the prospect that we've
all been watching who's finally living up to potential.
If the Indians make the World Series, then next year their guys will have
the name recognition to be stars.
To add to the list, Ken Griffey is leading his category again even though
he's out for 3 months. I wouldn't be surprised to see Matt Williams drawing
votes as well even though he's got a broken foot.
George
|
63.781 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 13 1995 11:14 | 5 |
|
Yeah, I know, but still - that doesn't keep me from wanting to
see the best players start...
Joe
|
63.782 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 13 1995 11:26 | 8 |
| You know who I voted for this year? On my NL ballot I voted for Rey Sanchez
at 2nd base.
Maybe there are guys more deserving but considering the job he had stepping
into the shoes of a living legend and considering that both Delino DeShields
and Carlos Garcia are having off years I figured he deserved a vote.
George
|
63.783 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Tue Jun 13 1995 19:53 | 12 |
|
Well,
I recieved the flag from good ole Mom the other day and
as usual, she over did it again. Here I'm expected and normal size
flag with Chief Wahoo on it and what do I get.......a flag thats 5
times the size of a normal one. Looks like I'm going to send it back
and get a regular one cus, where in the hell would I put it anyway.
Wahoo!
|
63.784 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 14 1995 08:38 | 11 |
63.785 | | SMART2::CHILDS | JJS the BucketsMaster | Wed Jun 14 1995 08:50 | 1 |
| drapped it around your body Hal...........
|
63.786 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Wed Jun 14 1995 09:30 | 7 |
|
Hal, if you were that big a fan you'd be *pleased* to have a
huge flag!
Sounds like you could sell it to Paul.
Roland
|
63.787 | CLEVELAND INDIANS 11 - BALTIMORE OREOS 0 | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Wed Jun 14 1995 10:07 | 28 |
|
AAALLLLBBBEEERRRTTT BBBEEELLLLLLEEE
JJJIIIMMM TTTHHHOOOMMMEEE
HOOOOOOOMME RUN!
Another complete game for Dennis!
I can only imagine playing on this team. What a feeling it must be
to win...win...win!
The flag cost her a good chunk of change....$65.00. any offers
before it goes back so I can get one of normal size?
Manny comes back and gets a couple of hits...I think he went 2-3.
Loften has gotten real hot with the bat lately.
Winfield is on the DL.
Another double for Albert Belle.
The Chief,
WAHOOOOOOO!
|
63.788 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 14 1995 10:13 | 5 |
|
So, any non-Tribe fans think the Indians can break the Yankee's
HR record in just 144 games?
Joe
|
63.789 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Wed Jun 14 1995 10:26 | 19 |
|
What's the record, and what year was it set in?
At first blush, I wouldn't put it past them. They only lose
11% of the schedule, and their home run power is quite diversified
(so half of it doesn't leave if a key player is injured or sits out
a game).
But to do it, I think Albert Belle has to get a little hotter.
For Hal:
Lofton's been hot with the bat for over 2 years now- the guy hit
.325 and what, .349? Where have you been? And what kind of son
are you - you're going to break your mother's heart if you return
that flag!
Roland
|
63.790 | It's a_conspiracy | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 14 1995 10:31 | 15 |
|
> So, any non-Tribe fans think the Indians can break the Yankee's
> HR record in just 144 games?
Sure. Don't forget, though, that the last two seasons have
demonstrated that ML pitching is at an absurd post-WWII low,
and this record could easily be shattered next year, by
Cleveland again, even.
The current doubly-juiced rabbitball conditions are why I'm
not sure I'd make straight-up comparisons with teams like the
1978 Red Sox (offensively, I mean).
glenn
|
63.791 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 14 1995 10:40 | 8 |
|
The record, for the record, is 240 HR in a season.
And Glenn, if the proposed strike zone & mound height changes go
through, I don't think anyone's going to be breaking HR records
next year...
Joe
|
63.792 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 14 1995 10:46 | 32 |
63.793 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Wed Jun 14 1995 15:34 | 11 |
| Ain't it funny how when the Tribe has finally shown that they just
might be for real, HAL show up, just as looney as he is during football
season. When the Tribe was losing, he was virtually nowhere to be
seen. Sorta like a few years ago, when he was all hopped on on
Browndirt from Clevescum, and rooting up one side and down the other
fer the 'spots, and then they went into the tank(by the 4th game of the
season), ended up something like 2-14 or 3-13, and the HAL didn't show
up til training camp the nexted year.
JaKe
|
63.794 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | In search of the ever Illusive T-bird | Wed Jun 14 1995 15:47 | 8 |
|
Jake,
If Hal did not show at times like these, we'd never know if he was
still around. How would we survive without he and Groaner to keep
us up to date on the current clevescum team. The indians are winning
for the first time since 47 and they have to let us know about it.
|
63.795 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 14 1995 15:56 | 5 |
|
Well, they did fine in 94, and before than it was 59, not 47,
actually, unless you want to count things like 86...
Joe
|
63.796 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 14 1995 18:58 | 8 |
63.797 | Bring on those Yanks!! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Wed Jun 14 1995 19:51 | 15 |
|
Break out the brooms......I smell a
S W E E P ! ! !
Let me be an INDIAN for a day!
The Chief,
WAHOOOOOOO!!!
|
63.798 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 15 1995 08:26 | 14 |
63.799 | chicago won't even make the wildcard at this pace | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 15 1995 08:28 | 12 |
63.800 | Sweep, Sweep, | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Thu Jun 15 1995 08:33 | 12 |
|
YES,
A L B E R T B E L L E
Home Run!
The chief,
Wahoo!
|
63.801 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 15 1995 08:43 | 12 |
63.802 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Naw Leens is one partying town! | Thu Jun 15 1995 09:02 | 8 |
| Is Doug Drabek considering a move to the Indians? Or is this just
more "smoke and mirrors"?
Hal, nice to see you come crawling out from under that rock...AGAIN!
billl
|
63.803 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Thu Jun 15 1995 09:40 | 6 |
| Re -1
Wow Note number .802 at 8.02. Is that a first?
I have my number for today
Mike
|
63.804 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 15 1995 09:46 | 24 |
|
> Is Doug Drabek considering a move to the Indians? Or is this just
> more "smoke and mirrors"?
The rumor, as reported by Peter Gammons, is that:
1) The Astros will give Hudek to anyone who will take Swindell.
2) If the Astros fall farther behind Cincy, they'll substitute
Drabek for Swindell.
3) The Yankees & Indians are interested if Drabek is included.
I'll say this - if the Indians manage to get Drabek & Hudek,
the pitching staff will be the deepest I've ever seen. Get rid
of the stiffs, and you have...
Martinez - Nagy - Hershiser - Ogea - Drabek - Black - Olson - Mesa -
Hudek - Poole - Assenmacher - Plunk - Tavarez
Wow.
Joe
|
63.805 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 15 1995 09:47 | 20 |
63.806 | since we're comparing 54 indians | AKOCOA::BREEN | Turn out the lights, the party's over | Thu Jun 15 1995 10:11 | 7 |
| That's not exactly Wynn,Lemon,Garcia and Feller with Narleski and Mossi
in the pen. It's a long way to Tipperary even in this shortened season
- don't forget some of this is spring training type results (as the
redsox know only too well).
Winning begets winning but so does losing beget losing.
|
63.807 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 15 1995 10:17 | 11 |
63.808 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Naw Leens is one partying town! | Thu Jun 15 1995 11:16 | 7 |
| re 802:
Put a buck on it for me.
billl
|
63.809 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Thu Jun 15 1995 11:49 | 15 |
|
>><<< Note 63.807 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same..." >>>
>>This is off the subject, and I'm not known for that... but...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Damn, groaner, why don't you warn us before you put something
ouiitrageously funny in here, I woulda wore some Depends, cause after 3
cups o coffee, I got to laughing so hard I wish I woulda been wearing
some...
JaKe
|
63.810 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 15 1995 11:50 | 2 |
63.811 | Groaner, you're a true wizard | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Thu Jun 15 1995 11:59 | 4 |
| Gosh, even someone from Clevescum figgered it out, I'm impressed.
JaKe
|
63.812 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Jun 15 1995 16:59 | 5 |
63.813 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 15 1995 17:20 | 16 |
| I'm not sure you can ever have a choke in baseball since the probability of
any one team winning is so small. It's even smaller with the expanded playoff.
But the Indians emerged as a favorite last year and were right up there with
the Yankees as co-favorites for the A.L. Pennant in the eyes of many.
Were I a fan the one thing that would trouble me about the Indians is that
they are peaking awfully early. It's still only June and the pace they are
on will be difficult to maintain. I've seen many teams build up big leads
only to lose them in late summer.
Of course the Red Sox come to mind but also the '84 Cubs who JUST hung on
then lost the NLCS to the Padres and that Phillies team from back in the 60's
that was something like 6 games up with 10 to go and didn't even make a
playoff. Others as well.
George
|
63.814 | Don't put that broom away..... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Thu Jun 15 1995 19:15 | 18 |
|
Time for all the other teams to make up some room on the Tribe....
The Indians don't play today.....
I'll be out in CA for the next two weeks then on vacation to the
cape. So, don't expect notes from me till I get back.
Here's to hopping that they continue on their winning ways. I was
really hopping they would be playing the A's while I was there but,
both the Giants and A's are out of town for the two weeks.....what a
bummer.
Go Indians!
The Chief,
WAHOOOOOO!
|
63.815 | when the Bucketeeers look up they see PINK | SMART2::CHILDS | JJS the BucketsMaster | Fri Jun 16 1995 08:56 | 6 |
|
That's the Soxs who peak early and then can't finish the job not the Indians.
Didn't the Tigers start out with like 34-9 record one year to put it away
before June?
mike
|
63.816 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 16 1995 09:14 | 7 |
63.817 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 16 1995 09:18 | 4 |
63.818 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Fri Jun 16 1995 09:58 | 20 |
|
Yeah, the '84 Tigers started 35-5. I was reading a collection of
Tom Boswell columns about Sparky. To paraphrase Sparky's quote at
that time, "if we don't win it all after this kind of start, I ought
to be hung..."
One thing about Sparky - he rarely leaves any room for interpretation...
Paul has a good point about teams having to play really stellar ball to
catch the Indians, although there's still a ton of time left. Basically
the Royals are the only ones with a chance. I wouldn't want to play the
Royals in a short series - you'd see Appier in your sleep. And at this
rate, they have a good shot at being the wild-card team. (Brrrr - I cringe
at even using that term in conjunction with baseball...)
Such a shame that you'll be gone for such a long time, Hal. We'll all
really miss your insightful notes. At least you're using the CAPS LOCK
key a little less.
Roland
|
63.819 | jays - indians final will test tribe | AKOCOA::BREEN | Turn out the lights, the party's over | Fri Jun 16 1995 10:30 | 7 |
| Well the royals are stubbornly dogging the indians except with the
detestable wildcard there may not be a race and no situation for the
indians to choke (or not - I'm a fair man).
if the jays get pitching straightned out they'll probalby win the east.
Gaston is their biggest problem, I remember him leaving Stewart in to
pitch to dyksta and almost blowing the series.
|
63.820 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jun 16 1995 10:50 | 21 |
63.821 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 16 1995 11:51 | 7 |
| > Did I mention I thought the tribe has a good shot at winning it all
> this year? Good thing the Yanks and ChiSox were favored, now if the
> indians lose, it can't be considered a choke.
If your Indians play .650 ball all the way, win their division by 10+
and have the best record in the AL and then lose in the playoffs, they'll
have choked.
|
63.822 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Jun 18 1995 08:44 | 17 |
63.823 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Jun 18 1995 10:28 | 17 |
63.824 | Yawn!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Get Well Mickey | Mon Jun 19 1995 09:10 | 15 |
|
Well,
You know this is getting boring! I mean has any team mastered a
team like the Yankees have mastered the tribe in the past year and a
half? What is that like 14 of the last 16 games won by the Yanks?
What pitching staff? Hershiser Bahhhhhhh Grimsley Bahhhhhh
Plunk Bahhhhhhhhhh Nagy (little Bahhh).
Don't worry Sox fans you won't be losing any P_name bets to
Groaner this week. You see I own his space till nexted Monday!! :-)
Boring I tell ya Boring!!!
|
63.825 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Mon Jun 19 1995 09:45 | 4 |
| Yankees ROOOL. Parade in October in the Bronx! (or is it November now?)
Mattingly and Boggs are co-gawds.
Mike
|
63.826 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 19 1995 09:52 | 10 |
|
Impressive series by the Yankees. Nagy was clearly off last night,
but the Yankees did an excellent job of capitalizing on it.
And the series _did_ make an excellent case for Bud Black remaining
with the Tribe.
Congrats, Chappy
Joe
|
63.827 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | D. A. R. R. Y. L. | Mon Jun 19 1995 10:07 | 7 |
|
Thanks Joe,
Haven't seen your Buddy Paul around have ya?
Chap
|
63.828 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Jun 19 1995 13:19 | 4 |
| Paul was last seen running around HLO-2 beating his chest yelling
"Pavin is god Pavin is god, how many US Opens has Norman won pal"
Jimbo
|
63.829 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | D. A. R. R. Y. L. | Mon Jun 19 1995 13:56 | 3 |
|
:-)
|
63.830 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Mon Jun 19 1995 15:08 | 2 |
63.831 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jun 19 1995 15:22 | 9 |
| Not only is golf a sport, it's probably the only major sport left from the
time when the concept of sport was was invented 4 or 5 centuries ago.
Most kings from that period felt that sports like golf were a useless waste
of time for a young gentleman and as such were a diversion from activities they
should be practicing such as archery and sword fighting.
But I do agree that the Yanks suck. That goes without saying,
George
|
63.832 | w | CAMONE::WAY | USS Bonefish, SS-223, In Memoriam | Mon Jun 19 1995 15:50 | 13 |
| Golf has a longer history than any of our major sports. In the golden age of
sports reporting (ie early 20th century) it was one of the majors that was
always reported on.
Grantland Rice was quite the golf reporter.....
If I had a son, and could choose his talent, and could ensure that he'd be good
enough to be at the top levels of the competition, I'd pick golf in an instant.
Lots better for him, and more money, than playing d-line in football....
'Sa
|
63.833 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jun 19 1995 16:53 | 8 |
| >> Not only is golf a sport, it's probably the only major sport left
>> from the time when the concept of sport was was invented 4 or 5
>> centuries ago.
The concept of sport goes back further than 400 or 500 years. Back
in African, Greek, Roman history thousands of years and just as far
or further in Asian and in the histories of indigenous peoples the
world over.
|
63.834 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Mon Jun 19 1995 18:34 | 4 |
63.835 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Mon Jun 19 1995 18:58 | 11 |
|
>The concept of sport goes back further than 400 or 500 years.
For that matter, most sports do. Basketball was played by the
mumble-mumble indians in what is now the Southern United States well
over 300 years ago. However, back then it was a life and death game.
Thus the expression "No blood, no foul" took a whole new meaning 8^)
Marc
|
63.836 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Mich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &1beer | Mon Jun 19 1995 21:57 | 7 |
|
I'd venture to say that I've spent more time on a golf course than
anyone else in here (I am in sales, you know), however, I don't think
golf is nearly as ol as horseracing, wrestling, or many track and field
events.
Brews
|
63.837 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Bonefish, SS-223, In Memoriam | Tue Jun 20 1995 11:53 | 8 |
| I'm sorry. I didn't mean to give the impression that I was proposing that
golf was the oldest sport. I just wanted to say that it's pretty damned old.
Hell, the first "sport" was probably running -- away from some animal that
wanted to eat you!
'Saw
|
63.838 | Betty Ford satellite clinic under CF stands? | SALEM::DODA | Bob Kraft, man of beneficence | Tue Jun 20 1995 12:55 | 13 |
| <<< Note 63.827 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "D. A. R. R. Y. L. " >>>
Chap, let me guess:
D A R R Y L
r d e e a o
u d c c n s
g i e r k e
c n u e r
t t i e
e l t
d y e
d
|
63.839 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 20 1995 14:29 | 24 |
|
The two most important statistics for any hitter are SLG and OBP
The following are the SLG and OBA for the Indians top hitters:
Manny Ramirez - .675 SLG, .447 OBP
Kenny Lofton - .482 SLG, .373 OBP
Carlos Baerga - .502 SLG, .373 OBP
Albert Belle - .644 SLG, .398 OBP
Jim Thome - .677 SLG, .435 OBP
Eddie Murray - .489 SLG, .358 OBP
Paul Sorrento - .644 SLG, .351 OBP
Anyone want to jump on the Jim Thome for MVP campaign?
BTW, the stats for some other notable AL 3B:
Robin Ventura - .555 SLG, .407 OBP
Wade Boggs - .353 SLG, .376 OBP
Gary Gaetti - .531 SLG, .325 OBP
Want to bet Thome doesn't make the All-* team anyway?
Joe
|
63.840 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Bonefish, SS-223, In Memoriam | Tue Jun 20 1995 14:31 | 13 |
| > Want to bet Thome doesn't make the All-* team anyway?
>
> Joe
Joe, it's like George always says -- it's note the all-best-player team.
It's the all-most-popular team.....
;^)
|
63.841 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 20 1995 14:49 | 6 |
|
Yeah, I know it.
Doesn't make me happy about it...
Joe
|
63.842 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Bonefish, SS-223, In Memoriam | Tue Jun 20 1995 14:55 | 9 |
| >
> Doesn't make me happy about it...
>
Agreed.
I never liked it when it became a fan vote-a-thon. The sportswriters might
not ALWAYS hit the nail on the head, but I'd bet they do it a helluva lot
more than the fans.
|
63.843 | I'll make a plug for JV | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 20 1995 15:17 | 18 |
|
> BTW, the stats for some other notable AL 3B:
>
> Robin Ventura - .555 SLG, .407 OBP
> Wade Boggs - .353 SLG, .376 OBP
> Gary Gaetti - .531 SLG, .325 OBP
What about Timmy Naehring? ;-)
> Anyone want to jump on the Jim Thome for MVP campaign?
In seriousness, adjusting for position and as a decent-fielding SS,
John Valentin's offensive numbers are very nice, too. He's the Sox'
MVP to date, no question. And I don't want to hear about Fenway park
effects, either; that JaKe Field is a bandbox...
glenn
|
63.844 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Tue Jun 20 1995 15:28 | 12 |
| > Anyone want to jump on the Jim Thome for MVP campaign?
Not me.
The best player on the Indians is Kenny Lofton. Excellent defense
at an important defensive position, best leadoff man in the game,
and has surprising power.
So if you go by the "best player on the best team" rule for MVP, I think it
should be Lofton.
But Thome and Naehring should be the All-Star 3rd basemen...
|
63.845 | Thome and Sprauge for the All-Star game if I'm votin | AD::HEATH | Don't get to excited yet | Tue Jun 20 1995 15:55 | 7 |
|
Naerhing is no all-star, some-star, no-star maybe. Dude's a stiff.
Those where some pretty interesting numbers Joe. Hey Chappy what kind
of wussy has a OB percentage higher than his SLG percentage. :*)
Jerry
|
63.846 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 20 1995 15:56 | 39 |
|
>> BTW, the stats for some other notable AL 3B:
>>
>> Robin Ventura - .555 SLG, .407 OBP
>> Wade Boggs - .353 SLG, .376 OBP
>> Gary Gaetti - .531 SLG, .325 OBP
> What about Timmy Naehring? ;-)
Sorry, I forgot about him...
Tim Naehring - .503 SLG, .444 OBP
>> Anyone want to jump on the Jim Thome for MVP campaign?
> In seriousness, adjusting for position and as a decent-fielding SS,
> John Valentin's offensive numbers are very nice, too. He's the Sox'
> MVP to date, no question.
OK, let's see - Valentin's got a .620 SLG, .431 OBP.
Neither's quite as good as Thome, but as you say we're comparing
a _very_ good fielding SS to an above average fielding 3B. Sounds
like the makings of a good race to me, even though neither is going
to get many votes...
> And I don't want to hear about Fenway park effects, either; that JaKe
> Field is a bandbox...
Eh - from what I've seen of last year's numbers, while it is a hitters
park, it's not _particularly_ so; not as much so as Fenway, at least.
BTW - w.r.t. Lofton for MVP - not this year, _unless_ he starts to
walk more often and stops the CS. Up to this point, his offense hasn't
been adequate for a reasonable argument to be made in his favor.
Last year and the year before are other matters altogether, though...
Joe
|
63.847 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | D. A. R. R. Y. L. | Tue Jun 20 1995 16:01 | 7 |
|
Never liked Boggs! Thank you
chap
|
63.848 | Indians' candidates might self-cancel... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jun 20 1995 16:39 | 15 |
|
> OK, let's see - Valentin's got a .620 SLG, .431 OBP.
>
> Neither's quite as good as Thome, but as you say we're comparing
> a _very_ good fielding SS to an above average fielding 3B. Sounds
> like the makings of a good race to me, even though neither is going
> to get many votes...
Since we're just talking the numbers to this point in time, _if_ Valentin
were to continue on that pace, and the Red Sox on their pace (shaddup
Chap ;-), I think JV would collect quite a few votes. Thome, on the other
hand, would just get lost in a sea of Wahoo...
glenn
|
63.849 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 20 1995 16:52 | 11 |
|
> -< Indians' candidates might self-cancel... >-
I'll be more surprised if it _doesn't_ happen than if it does.
I'm not sure JV is well enough recognized to get MVP votes,
at least this year. When I suggested on the Cleveland Sports
Mailing List that he was the clear All-* choice at SS, the
reaction ranged from "Who?" to "Yeah, right, Cal's the man."
Joe
|
63.850 | HTH | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jun 20 1995 17:00 | 6 |
|
Clevelanders might get to see some of their guys in the
all-star game if the PA announcer would remind the fans at
Jacob's Field to punch the hole next to the names on the ballot
instead of marking x next to 'em.
|
63.851 | ;-) | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Jun 20 1995 17:01 | 0 |
63.852 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 20 1995 17:10 | 8 |
|
I just tried that at the ESPN WWW site, and now my monitor doesn't
seem to work...
Joe
(P.S. As of the latest release, Belle, Lofton, and Alomar would
start at the all star game...)
|
63.853 | no one reads my notes anyways... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Tue Jun 20 1995 17:12 | 4 |
63.854 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Tue Jun 20 1995 17:45 | 5 |
63.855 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Tue Jun 20 1995 17:45 | 3 |
63.856 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Wed Jun 21 1995 08:41 | 3 |
63.857 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Jun 21 1995 11:24 | 4 |
|
It's getting harder and harder to deny that if this Cleveland
team doesn't at least *make* it to the World Series, it will
have been a major choke job.
|
63.858 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed Jun 21 1995 13:12 | 2 |
63.859 | Not only Cleveland | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Reasonable summer rates | Wed Jun 21 1995 13:34 | 4 |
| re .858 - Funny, that's what they are saying here in Atlanta, too.
UMDan
|
63.860 | Holy crap! Sox win! | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | Keep your SOX on | Thu Jun 22 1995 02:54 | 4 |
| Red Sox 3 cleveland 1 Gee, I guess everybody can lose.
Even the all powerful tribe of ohio.
Lil Ed
|
63.861 | tribe loses on purpose per orders of commish | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Thu Jun 22 1995 08:02 | 4 |
63.862 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Thu Jun 22 1995 09:14 | 7 |
| RE: .861
>"Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!"
> The CLEVELAND INDIANS ARE THE MOST POWERFUL TEAM IN THE UNIVERSE.
Are you on medication for this? :-)
|
63.863 | Ohio Tourism | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Jun 22 1995 09:44 | 6 |
| The State of Ohio is apparently trying to increase their tourism this year
by infusing funds into their new slogan:
"If you forget Cleveland, it's a nice state!"
zamboni
|
63.864 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Waiting for it in the mail!! | Thu Jun 22 1995 10:53 | 6 |
| re.863
finally, the rest of Ohio wises up.
JaKe
|
63.865 | Have you been fibbin to us Paul???? | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Thu Jun 22 1995 12:04 | 15 |
|
That reminds me......On Monday I was listening to the Gary Taungay
show on WWTM out of Wooostah and he had as a guest the baseball writer
from the Cleveland Plain Dealer on. He was a very knowledgeable guy
and for a beat writer very honest about the team chances (with the
Indians saying they'll win it is being honest) and the discussion got
around to Jacobs Field. He was discribing how much of a beautiful
park it is and all its super gadgets like the huge weightroom, pool
ect. and this is as close to a direct quote as I can remember....
"When you walk into Jacobs field it is not at all like Cleveland,
it is beautiful" does this mean the rest of Cleveland is a total
dump? Could some of you Clevelanders' help me out?
Jerry
|
63.866 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Thu Jun 22 1995 16:28 | 6 |
63.867 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Jun 22 1995 16:44 | 5 |
|
Mass./Boston folks don't mind you making fun of our home state
half as much as you mind us making fun of Cleveland. Of course,
that could be because you chose to live here in Mass. whereas folks
like myself wouldn't move to Cleveland for any reason.
|
63.868 | Nice try Alvin | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Thu Jun 22 1995 17:32 | 6 |
63.869 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Thu Jun 22 1995 17:33 | 3 |
63.870 | Been there? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jun 22 1995 18:08 | 7 |
| Been there?
we've got three divisions and a alc in 8 prior, in till 9/20 in '91
and at least some action into the all star game in other years.
Even in our last full season - awful by our standards we were as
good as cleveland, or only as bad.
|
63.871 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Thu Jun 22 1995 18:31 | 4 |
63.872 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jun 23 1995 10:02 | 3 |
|
Po' po' Groaner. Driven to defend a city that he chooses not
to live in.
|
63.873 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 23 1995 10:24 | 13 |
|
Chooses not to live in?
As if there's much of a choice in the matter.
Given the choice between doing the job I have now in MA and the
job I have now in Cleveland, I'd take Cleveland every time.
Of course, the job I have now doesn't _exist_ in Cleveland (trust
me, I looked), so it's not really a relevant question.
Joe (who'd still much rather live in MA then CA or AZ or someplace
like that...)
|
63.874 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Bonefish, SS-223, In Memoriam | Fri Jun 23 1995 10:40 | 26 |
| I like living where I live.
It's expensive sometimes (like when I pull up to the gas pump) but there's a
sense of family roots here that is strong, and a sense of history that I feel
and I haven't begun to explore it yet.
Some folks yearn to go someplace else. I've never felt that way. My brother
does -- he'd love to move south. But I never have felt that.
My family has been here since 1630, which is a long time. I like the feeling
that gives me.
I've seen lots of changes just in the short time I've lived. There's lots more
yuppies and "plastic folks" around now than ever before, as if they'd been
drawn here by the magnetic pull of big money in Hartford and New Haven and
Stamford and Greenwich, and you have to look harder and harder to find the real
people of the state. The plain folks who don't wear tennis clothes around the
center of downtown just to look fashionable. The plain folks who don't drive
Volvo's and Saabs.
I like it here, and I think I'll stay here, and I can only hope that the
plastic people don't completely overrun those of us who were here long before
they came.....
'Saw
|
63.875 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jun 23 1995 11:48 | 13 |
|
Of course, Joe the difference between you and Paul is that
*you* aren't constantly ragging on Mass./Boston. That in and
of itself is no big deal because this sure ain't no Utopia
and most of us can take it as well as dish it (unlike Paul)
but it seems kind of foolish for someone who isn't being
forced to live here. If I had as big a problem with this
area as Paul pretends to, I sure as hell wouldn't live here.
No sense in wasting any more space in this here note on this
subject seeing as how the Indians are the hottest thing going
right now. Off to the junk note with it.
|
63.876 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Official 'Yanni' Survivor!!! | Fri Jun 23 1995 12:04 | 7 |
| Won't it be nice when September comes and Groaner will have to return
to third grade and won't be able to obnoxiously note so damned
much!!!!!
JaKe
|
63.877 | don't knock it unless you've tried it | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Jun 23 1995 12:48 | 4 |
63.878 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Jun 23 1995 12:49 | 4 |
63.879 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 23 1995 13:08 | 11 |
|
> -< don't knock it unless you've tried it >-
>> Joe (who'd still much rather live in MA then CA or AZ or someplace
>> like that...)
Unless AZ has suddenly (a) started getting at least 2' of snow
a year and (b) started staying under 100 for most of the summer,
and I haven't heard about it, I'll continue knocking it...
Joe
|
63.880 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Jun 23 1995 14:36 | 10 |
63.881 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 23 1995 15:08 | 14 |
|
Mike,
I like my ignorance - keeps me from getting arrogant... B^)
I _have_ been to AZ, actually, but only to the areas where 7' of
snow would be a good hint of an ongoing major ice age.
Let me restate - at least 2' of snow a year reasonably close to
sea level.
Can't stand skiing, personally...
Joe
|
63.882 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Jun 23 1995 15:37 | 5 |
63.883 | the losers pname says it all -> full of anger | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Fri Jun 23 1995 15:48 | 37 |
63.884 | I was .45 min away from snow in the winter by the way | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Fri Jun 23 1995 16:11 | 7 |
|
Well Mike.....I have lived in Tucson and Boston. I would choose New
England over that oven in a second. I don't want to hear about dry
heat either. I didn't believe it then and won't now.
Jerry
|
63.885 | The Crazy Sandbagger, Jr. | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jun 23 1995 16:32 | 13 |
|
re. 883
Groaner, take away the indoor soccer title that you were puffing
your chest about and your Cleveland teams have a total of zero
titles in your lifetime. That's zero. Zip. Zilch. None. Nada.
Nein. Not one. Not any. The big donut. The goose egg. An airball.
Batting .000. Stuck at the starting gate. Rowing with one oar.
We're on the road to nowhere...Your so used to losing that you
don't have the stones to step forward and admit that the Indians
are the odds-on to take it all and if they don't it'll be a choke
job.
|
63.886 | is he dumb or stupid? | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Fri Jun 23 1995 16:38 | 21 |
63.887 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Waiting fer the mail | Fri Jun 23 1995 16:45 | 10 |
|
>> But what else is new... you never met a fact that you
>>didn't manipulate or create.
Sheesh, Groaner, sounds like a truly accurate description of you, more
than a description of tommy.
JaKe
|
63.888 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Fri Jun 23 1995 16:53 | 26 |
|
People should feel free to modify this, but certainly it should provide
us with at least another 100 replies 8^)
I choose to define "recent past" as the last 10 years, and Ancient past
as older than that time period.
Today Recent Past Ancient Past Total
----- ----------- ------------ -----
Basketball Cavs Cavs Celtics 2C - 1B
Baseball Indians Red sox Red Sox 1C - 2B
Football even Cleveland Cleveland 2C - 0B
Hockey HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 0C - 3B
College Sports Boston Boston Boston 0C - 3B
Other Clev. even Boston 1C - 1B
So my totals come out to:
6 points for Cleveland
10 points for Boston
2 even points
Have fun 8^)
Marc
|
63.889 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | D. A. R. R. Y. L. | Fri Jun 23 1995 16:56 | 8 |
|
BTW
Nashua NH = ARM PIT OF New England
Chap
|
63.890 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Waiting fer the mail | Fri Jun 23 1995 16:59 | 4 |
| Northeast Ohio==butthole of the world....Clevescum way up that butthole
JaKe
|
63.891 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Jun 23 1995 17:07 | 4 |
63.892 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Fri Jun 23 1995 17:18 | 7 |
63.893 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jun 23 1995 17:24 | 3 |
|
In the past ten years Boston has had a team in the NBA championship
(and won), the SB and the WS. Cleveland has not. Nuff said.
|
63.894 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Fri Jun 23 1995 17:32 | 7 |
63.895 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Fri Jun 23 1995 17:49 | 12 |
|
> Nashua NH = ARM PIT OF New England
I suppose greater metro Westminster was better?
Stay out of French Hill and the tree streets and the rest of Nashua
is great. Same can be said of most cities - there are one or two bad
spots.
I hate to digress, but let's talk about the Indians. What is the rotation
now? Last I heard, Clark went to the minors, and Ogea went into the rotation.
What has happened to that stiff Grimsley?
|
63.896 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Fri Jun 23 1995 17:59 | 9 |
| >What did you have to eat for dinner on June 22nd, 1987... ten years
>recents past...
Lasagne, chips, diet pepsi, cake and a lot of good friends over for
dinner. That was the day I graduated high school. Would you like to
know the weather and/or the movie that played on TV that night too?
Marc
|
63.897 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Fri Jun 23 1995 18:46 | 7 |
| re -1:
You've obviously never been to Lowell, Ma and New Haven, Ct
billl
|
63.898 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Sat Jun 24 1995 09:38 | 19 |
63.899 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS! | Sun Jun 25 1995 18:35 | 4 |
63.900 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Jun 26 1995 08:08 | 6 |
63.901 | News at 11!!!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Mon Jun 26 1995 09:36 | 3 |
|
Indians are Reeling...
|
63.902 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 26 1995 09:57 | 14 |
|
Reeling? No.
Slumping? Decidely.
The injury bug seems to have hit; Hershiser's on the DL, and Nagy's
pitching like he should be. Combine this with Black returning to early
season form, and it meant trouble.
Also, this weekend demonstrated nicely the reason why it's still
Chicago that worries me, and not KC. Chicago has the arms, and more
offense.
Joe
|
63.903 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jun 26 1995 16:16 | 6 |
63.904 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Mon Jun 26 1995 16:39 | 12 |
|
,,=============..
|| ||
=====|| ||
=====|| White ||
=====|| Sox ||
|| ||
``=============''
Objects in mirror may be closer than they appear!
|
63.905 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Mon Jun 26 1995 16:44 | 9 |
|
BTW Groaner, if you wan't to lose another P_name bet I told you
what the conditions were I'd accept? Whoever made it farther in the
playoffs? Now the Yanks are just a third place team? You can't lose
not with that LEAGUE LEADING PITCHING STAFF that Cleveland possesses.
What's it gonna be boy!!
|
63.906 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jun 26 1995 16:49 | 8 |
63.907 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jun 26 1995 16:55 | 8 |
|
>> Sure, I'll accept the pname wager. Team with better record at the
>> end of the regular season - 1 week of pname. Cool. You're on.
I haven't seen anyone with thus little faith in a very good team
since TCM tried to tell us that he was still nervous when the
Rangers were up 3-1 in the CUP finals against Vancouver. I guess
a 4 game losing streak will do that to you, eh, Groaner?
|
63.908 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 26 1995 17:32 | 9 |
| > Summary - starting staff is strong now and should only get better.
> Good news for the rest of the AL.
Same was said about the ChiSox a couple of years ago. McDowell is gone,
and Fernandez (4.87), Bere (5.48) and Alvarez (5.78) aren't currently
what everyone thought they'd be, are they ?
If I were a GM I'd be very reluctant to bank on long-term consistency
from pitchers. Very few provide it.
|
63.909 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jun 26 1995 17:34 | 8 |
63.910 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Mich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &1beer | Mon Jun 26 1995 19:50 | 15 |
|
<<< Note 63.883 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Yanks RULE, Tribe SUCKS!" >>>
> People who do have a clue, have consistently ranked Cleveland in the
> top 10 most liveable cities in the country. Yes, Boston has also be
> listed in the top 10, but Boston is Boston and I doubt very much that
Every night I go home to "the most liveable city in the World," it must
be true because Scottsdale was voted that by this group, and it says
it on the sign on the way into town. On the other hand, some people
say it's too hot, like Joe, and don't want to live here. I figure
anyone who doesn't ski but till lives where they have shovel snow don't
belong in my town anyway. 8^)
brew
|
63.911 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Tue Jun 27 1995 08:10 | 14 |
63.912 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 27 1995 09:34 | 14 |
|
> Now I can see why Hargrove wouldn't take my advice and put Ogea
> in the rotation to start the season
Oh, come on. Hargrove rightly gets blasted for some things (hitting
Vizquel 2nd being #1 among them), but his record of player development
_is_ impressive. Since he's managed the Indians, Lofton, Baerga,
Belle, Thome, Ramirez, Sorrento, and Kirby have become starters
for the Indians, and he's now showing some ability to develop pitchers.
He might not develop them quite as quickly as we might hope, but
making an overnight success of a control pitcher in the majors _isn't_
easy.
Joe
|
63.913 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Tue Jun 27 1995 09:57 | 5 |
63.914 | Buck Buck Byuuuckk | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Tue Jun 27 1995 09:58 | 11 |
|
Groaner I understand your afraid of the Yankees sweeping the Tribe
in the playoffs as you know we own the tribe. So I'll stop asking you
about the P_name bet I'll let you off the hook.
Noone but Groaner read after this Form Feed please?
And I won't tell your Sports Brethren Your a COWARD!!!
Chap
|
63.915 | Hamstring? | VERBOS::NAZZARO | Bring ALexi Lalas to Boston! | Tue Jun 27 1995 10:26 | 3 |
| How bad was Lofton hurt?
NAZZ
|
63.916 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 27 1995 10:37 | 2 |
|
Haven't heard.
|
63.917 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Tue Jun 27 1995 15:14 | 5 |
63.918 | Joe help him will ya.... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Tue Jun 27 1995 15:20 | 16 |
|
Read my lips....
IF Cleveland makes the playoffs and the Yankees don't you win.
Vica Versa I win. (yeah right with that loaded Cleveland
powerhouse)
If we both make the playoffs, (this is where it may get difficult
for a country boy like you) WHOEVER GETS FARTHER IN THE PLAYOFFS WINS
the bet.
Hopefully we'll meet head to head in the ALCS Part Duex!!
Chap
|
63.919 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 27 1995 16:57 | 6 |
|
I'll take that pname bet, Chappy.
Also, w.r.t. Lofton - he's day to day.
Joe
|
63.920 | '95 Tribe = '78 Red Sox | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 27 1995 17:05 | 4 |
| > Also, w.r.t. Lofton - he's day to day.
Hershiser, now Lofton.... You knew the joy ride would end sooner or
later.
|
63.921 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 27 1995 17:11 | 12 |
|
>> Also, w.r.t. Lofton - he's day to day.
>Hershiser, now Lofton.... You knew the joy ride would end sooner or
>later.
Oh, come on. Neither's a terribly significant injury; Hershiser's
injury is likely to do more to _help_ the team, long term, than
hurt it (in that it provides opportunities for young pitchers to
develop).
Joe
|
63.922 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Tue Jun 27 1995 18:16 | 3 |
63.923 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Mich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &1beer | Tue Jun 27 1995 22:23 | 4 |
|
Like a tue Clevelander, Groaner bows to the pressure...
brews
|
63.924 | WS losses DON'T COUNT! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Tue Jun 27 1995 23:25 | 7 |
63.925 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 08:15 | 26 |
63.926 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:02 | 11 |
|
Joe, sorry this is personal.
Just the P_name bet with Groaner will be sufficient.
I'll have a real good one for ya Groanie!!! :-)
Chap
|
63.927 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 10:11 | 3 |
63.928 | go figure... | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Jun 28 1995 11:13 | 9 |
| Another interesting tidbit from Jimbo lasted night...
Groaner actually has a mother...
And she LIKES him!
billl
|
63.929 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Jun 28 1995 12:07 | 3 |
| guilty as charged!
Jimbo
|
63.930 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 28 1995 12:42 | 6 |
| >>Hershiser, now Lofton.... You knew the joy ride would end sooner or
>>later.
> Oh, come on. Neither's a terribly significant injury
Maybe. But more will follow....
|
63.931 | Where did this HALogic come from? ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 28 1995 13:46 | 10 |
|
> Its not like Ogea throws in the 70s you know... he does have an 85-88
> mph heater... just like Greg Maddux.
Thousands upon thousands of young men across this country have 85-88
MPH heaters... NOT just like Greg Maddux.
glenn
|
63.932 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 28 1995 15:08 | 12 |
|
> Maybe. But more will follow....
Yes, I expect they will. Your point being?
Other than Carlos Baerga, there's no player they can't replace
with a major league level player on offense (well, catcher, but
they've been living with that all year and Alomar's almost back),
and the Indians have lots of reasonable choices among pitcher,
even without resorting to a trade.
Joe
|
63.933 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 16:40 | 3 |
63.934 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 16:41 | 8 |
63.935 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Wed Jun 28 1995 16:47 | 11 |
| > If Lofton goes on the DL, big
> deal... Kirby can fill in for a while and I'm sure Burnitz would get
> called up.
Isn't Burnitz the same guy you thought was dead weight a bunch of replies
back? I agreed at the time, and my opinion hasn't changed.
Kirby's a good player, but he's not Kenny Lofton. With Lofton only having
a sore hamstring, he doesn't have to be.
Just hope Lofton doesn't turn into Jeffrey Hamstring(tm) of the Orioles.
|
63.936 | you can wish them away all you want, its a LOCK | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 16:53 | 11 |
63.937 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 28 1995 16:55 | 9 |
| > Yes, I expect they will. Your point being?
That they've marched through the first 1/3 of the year unscathed.
The Yanks had a very good year last year and only DL'd players
10 times. This year they're already at 6. It's no coincidence that
the Indians have had a good start while none of their key players
have been hurt. Injuries happen. Let's see how well they play
when they're missing a good player for a while. If all this
"no-name" depth produces, I'll tip my hat to them.
|
63.938 | Indians won't go from .700 to .300 | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:00 | 8 |
|
Sure, the Indians may slide a bit, but it's all over in the AL Central.
They can coast home rather easily. As far as any injuries are concerned,
the only ones that matter are the ones still present in late September,
heading into October...
glenn
|
63.939 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:06 | 6 |
|
>> -< you can wish them away all you want, its a LOCK >-
There you have it! Vegas said so and now Groaner backs it up.
If the Indians don't win, it will have been a major choke job.
|
63.940 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:06 | 10 |
63.941 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:07 | 5 |
63.942 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:09 | 6 |
|
Any anyway, Joe, the Tribe doesn't get most of its production from
players who are past their prime, and therefore more likely to
be injured... B^)
Joe
|
63.943 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:17 | 9 |
|
>> Are you a choke expert or something?
Don't hafta be no expert. Vegas has made the Indians the
the odds on favorite, they've got the best record in base-
ball and you've said yourself that "it's a lock". The only
thing holding this admittedly excellent ball club back is
the old chicken bone.
|
63.944 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:20 | 11 |
|
> Sure, this might not compare to the injuries of other teams,
> but this is still not ZERO. The starting catcher, and all star,
> the #3 starter and top starter from last year.
But Sandy Alomar's always injured, and perpetually a (disabled)
All-Star because ignorant voters confuse him with his brother, so
you can't count his injury as working against the status quo...
glenn
|
63.945 | Hahahaha | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:28 | 10 |
|
>> But Sandy Alomar's always injured, and perpetually a (disabled)
>> All-Star because ignorant voters confuse him with his brother, so
>> you can't count his injury as working against the status quo...
A more skeptical person might dismiss Groaner's reasoning as the
excuse-making of a fan conditioned to defeat and despair. But not
me, I know his reasonings are based on sound statistical analysis
and historic precedent.
|
63.946 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:30 | 50 |
| > Comparing Lofton who is day-to-day with a hamstring pull to Hammonds
> is ridiculous. Gee, I hope Aaron Sele doesn't turn into a guy who
> is always on the DL with shoulder problems. What is the basis for the
> comment comparing Hammonds and Lofton?
I suggest a reading comprehension course.
I said:
Just hope Lofton doesn't turn into Jeffrey Hamstring(tm) of the Orioles.
I didn't say he was Hammonds. I said to hope he didn't turn into him.
Hammonds is a guy who has all the potential in the world, but constantly
has nagging injuries that don't end his career, but keep him from using his
talents to the Orioles advantage. Some guys, for whatever reason, seem to
be tightly wound (for lack of a better phrase), and end up with a lot of these
type of injuries. Lofton hasn't been like that so far, but I'm saying to
hope it doesn't happen. I think sustained absences on his part would hurt
the Indians offense more than the loss of *any* other player on that team.
He's the best leadoff hitter in baseball - his OBP and speed make a lot of
things possible for the 3-4-5 hitters.
And, in keeping with the style of some of your notes...
FLAME ON
Lighten up. I've been trying to add some objective comments about the Indians
all along the way this year. I haven't been overly critical, and I haven't
been bandwagon jumping. This obviously doesn't sit well with you.
> The more garbage like this that pops up, the more garbage this
> notesfile is going to receive when the Indians take it all this year.
It's a comment. "Garbage" is a false list of "eliminated teams" every couple
of days. You want to chest-thump because the Indians are doing well? Great -
as a long-time Tribe fan you deserve to. You want to encourage HAL and his
caps lock spasms? Fine - when your team is doing great you want to share the
joy with other fans. But after some of the replies you've put in here,
misreading someone else's comment (either intentionally or not) and calling it
"garbage" is an extreme case of the pot calling the kettle black.
I didn't "wish them away". I made a statement. Please try to check your
paranoia at the door.
FLAME OFF
RE: Sele. He *is* turning into a guy with shoulder problems. He was having
some troubles last year, and he's been out a good portion of this year. If
I were a GM right now, I'm not sure I'd want any part of him in a deal.
Roland
|
63.947 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:34 | 11 |
|
w.r.t. Alomar
Well, yes and no. It all depends upon the rest of the season;
while he hasn't remained healthy for a full season, he hasn't
miss a full season either.
And anyway, just because an injury is expected doesn't mean that
it doesn't hurt the team.
Joe
|
63.948 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:35 | 5 |
63.949 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 17:38 | 25 |
63.950 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jun 28 1995 18:00 | 3 |
| What's the story with Nagy? He seems to be off a bit lately.
George
|
63.951 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 28 1995 18:08 | 6 |
|
He has been; I haven't heard _anything_ though, so I suspect he
was simply overused sometime a month back, and is suffering from
that.
Joe
|
63.952 | they only way they don't win it all is the umps... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 21:03 | 2 |
63.953 | NL sips... (minor leagues) | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jun 28 1995 21:04 | 6 |
63.954 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | NOTFabio,& I don't play him on TV | Wed Jun 28 1995 23:25 | 10 |
| re-1
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, waaaaaaaaaaah
AL stands fer "Almost League". so whaddya expect ya freakin' crybaby.
they play tainted baseball, what with the designated pansy.
JaKe
|
63.955 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jun 29 1995 08:07 | 2 |
63.956 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jun 29 1995 08:07 | 5 |
63.957 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Bonefish, SS-223, In Memoriam | Thu Jun 29 1995 09:33 | 5 |
| I like watching the Red Sox play in Fenway, but on any given night I'd rather
see an NL game.....
'Saw
|
63.958 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Thu Jun 29 1995 09:41 | 7 |
|
Funny that worst team in baseball your talking about went into the
Jake by the lake and kicked some Native American Butt!!
Chap
|
63.959 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jun 29 1995 10:29 | 3 |
63.960 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 29 1995 10:29 | 13 |
|
> I like watching the Red Sox play in Fenway, but on any given night I'd rather
> see an NL game.....
Any game in Fenway or Wrigley is better than any game anywhere else...
Reportedly the AL owners are considering dumping the Designated Geek.
Here's hoping they do. That would leave the NL as superior only in
Total Artificiality...
glenn
|
63.961 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 29 1995 11:18 | 8 |
| I heard they were thinking of dumping the DH as well but that they felt
they might get flack from the players union since a number of veterans depend
on the DH for their livelihood.
If I were MLB, I'd get a contract inked before picking another fight with
the union.
George
|
63.962 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jun 29 1995 11:51 | 5 |
| > If I were MLB, I'd get a contract inked before picking another fight with
>the union.
This is far from over. When the players finally accept the realities of
the market, a deal will get done.
|
63.963 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 29 1995 15:50 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 63.962 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>This is far from over. When the players finally accept the realities of
>the market, a deal will get done.
... when the owners accept the reality of the market a deal will get done.
George
|
63.964 | Owners fought a fairly good fight, just simply lost | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jun 29 1995 16:35 | 9 |
| When the owners accept the fact that they lost that will be a start.
Actually I'm reading the thing that's holding up a deal is internal
fighting amongst the owners.
I'm thinking to myself that putting the "tax" money into the
championship pool and then dividing it by salary (ratios) may be an
idea worth thinking about. Problem is it goes against the network
thinking which is based on mediocrity which has been the credo of tv
for 35 years now.
|
63.965 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jun 29 1995 16:38 | 11 |
|
> This is far from over. When the players finally accept the realities of
> the market, a deal will get done.
Yeah, that's pretty much a direct contradiction, Joe; "the realities
of the market" is exactly what the players are demanding. And, yes,
it could be one of those beware-of-what-you-ask-for situations, but
nonetheless, the market is what they want...
glenn
|
63.966 | you know it's coming... | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jun 29 1995 17:06 | 14 |
| >> This is far from over. When the players finally accept the realities of
>> the market, a deal will get done.
> Yeah, that's pretty much a direct contradiction, Joe; "the realities
> of the market" is exactly what the players are demanding.
Yeah, and when they returned to the market in April, they immediately
started crying "collusion" 'cause they weren't getting their automatic
hikes based on comparisons of their stats with others of like ability.
"realities of the market" indeed....
Wait 'til they claim this off-season that the owners somehow master-minded
the low fan turnout to undermine the business and further restrict salaries...
|
63.967 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 29 1995 17:35 | 9 |
| Clearly it's the owners who don't want to go along with the realities of the
market. They are the ones asking for a cap and they are the ones trying to
expand when the bottom layer of the teams they have are not making money.
All the players are asking is that there be no cap and that they can
negotiate with teams on a player by player basis. They are totally in favor of
a free market system.
George
|
63.968 | Just stop Selig is the answer | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jun 29 1995 18:05 | 17 |
| George,
Apparently everyone including a majority of owners now know they
can't force their castor oil down the players throat and in addition
when the fans blame the players they show there anger by not buying the
tickets and watching the games which the owners need to pay said-same
players strategy.
The big problem still remains that a minority coalition of small
market owners is now holding us all hostage and are willing to destroy
"big" league baseball as we know and make it a minor league sport since
Selig and the others are in minor leagues location-wise themselves.
As you know all of their problems could be solved in one fell swoop
by engendering free market competition and allowing the pittsburghs and
milwaukees to move where the action is (Atlanticcoast/ Buffalo-Hamilton,
Florida; even Central Michigan) and put Triple-A+ independent minor
league teams in those towns.
|
63.969 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 29 1995 18:15 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 63.968 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> Apparently everyone including a majority of owners now know they
> can't force their castor oil down the players throat and in addition
> when the fans blame the players they show there anger by not buying the
> tickets and watching the games which the owners need to pay said-same
> players strategy.
I think it's a bit of a leap to say that the fans are blaming the players.
Some fans blame the players, certainly the more vocal fans. Other fans blame
the owners, and some blame both.
Other fans, especially those that were marginal to begin with, are not really
blaming either side, they just lost interest and wandered off because there was
no World Series.
In any case, it's the owners, in the long run, who are going to lose and it's
those minority owners who stand to lose the most. The Yankees and Dodgers will
survive no matter what happens, they have the money and fan base to ride out
the storm, but if teams like Pittsburgh and Milwaukee don't straighten out and
cut a deal with the players, they risk serious financial problems.
George
|
63.970 | Can you imagine playing World Series for money? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jun 29 1995 18:22 | 7 |
| My point is no matter who they're blaming the result is less revenue
which = less profits to the owners. The trickle down to < $ for
players comes later.
NO, Milburgh just can't compete in the open market. I suggested
elsewhere that throwing the "tax" into the winners pool might be a
solution but unfortunately corporate minds no longer think that way.
|
63.971 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jun 30 1995 08:30 | 8 |
63.972 | Indians clinch WS title... film at 11 | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jun 30 1995 08:35 | 4 |
63.973 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 30 1995 09:30 | 6 |
|
Paul,
Omar Vizquel is still a hole in the lineup.
Joe
|
63.974 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jun 30 1995 09:37 | 3 |
63.975 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 30 1995 09:42 | 7 |
|
OBA - .322
SLG - .321
If that's not a hole in the lineup, I don't know what is.
Joe
|
63.976 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:23 | 15 |
| > In any case, it's the owners, in the long run, who are going to lose and it's
>those minority owners who stand to lose the most.
No matter what happens each ONE of these owners will still be wealthy.
And all of the superstars will be wealthy. BUT, the middle-piddle and
young not-yet-proven players are the ones who will get hurt.
Much has been made of the split between small- and big-market owners,
but there may surface a split between the few elite big-money players
and the masses. No matter how this is settled (yes, even in a completely
free system), the gulf between superstar and everyone else will be huge.
The owners will have lost a lot of money, and the majority of players
will have lost a lot of money (some their jobs), and they'll all look
back and wonder why they pushed the sport over the cliff.
|
63.977 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:25 | 5 |
| > Bad news for the rest of the AL, Sandy Alomar was activated last night.
> With him batting 9th (yes 9th) there are NO holes in the Indians
> line-up.
Anyone got career numbers on this hole-plugger ?
|
63.978 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:30 | 10 |
|
>> No matter what happens each ONE of these owners will still be wealthy.
>> And all of the superstars will be wealthy. BUT, the middle-piddle and
>> young not-yet-proven players are the ones who will get hurt.
All you ever heard from the folks that sympathize for the owners was
that mediocre ball players were vastly overpaid. Now that those sal-
aries are being adjusted, it's those self-same owner-sympathizers that
want to point to that fact as eveidence that the players are hurting
the game/themselves/western civilization. Go figure.
|
63.979 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 30 1995 11:38 | 9 |
|
Don't have the exact numbers, but they're ~.270 BA, ~.400 SLG
Take out a disasterous, injury ridden 1991, and they're even better
than that.
Alomar's not a big offensive plus at catcher (though he _is_ a small
one), but he certainly does fill a hole.
Joe
|
63.980 | Clemens as player-rep vs Joe Kliene in nba\ | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jun 30 1995 13:23 | 11 |
| Joe, we're now seeing the split between mega-star - 8-12 in the nba
with the latter trying to ram an agreement thru and missing. The
acrimony in the mlb has masked a potential split amongst the players.
The differnece as I mentioned elsewhere is that in the mlb it is the
high priced players doing the negotiating (ironically because of the
negative action by owners against labor reps - how sweet it is).
Interesting subject for an article comparing labor success to how
ownership treats the player-reps: I'd guess some of the nba reps were
taken care of to encourage the middle players to take the job over the
stars.
|
63.981 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 30 1995 15:00 | 21 |
| > All you ever heard from the folks that sympathize for the owners was
> that mediocre ball players were vastly overpaid.
They are, and this is where the adjustments must be made... (so...)
>Now that those sal-
> aries are being adjusted, it's those self-same owner-sympathizers that
> want to point to that fact as eveidence that the players are hurting
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> the game/themselves/western civilization. Go figure.
Is that what I was saying ??? Classic example of reading what you want
to hear. Take note people !!
In .976 all I was responding to was George's claim that "it's the owners,
in the long run...who stand to lose the most." How is it that these
millionaires are going to be hurt "most" ? Most, if not all, have their
fortunes outside of baseball. Quite the opposite for the players, except
for the superstars (as I stated).
|
63.982 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 30 1995 15:16 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 63.981 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>In .976 all I was responding to was George's claim that "it's the owners,
>in the long run...who stand to lose the most." How is it that these
>millionaires are going to be hurt "most" ? Most, if not all, have their
>fortunes outside of baseball. Quite the opposite for the players, except
>for the superstars (as I stated).
Well I suppose if you feel money is everything you have a point but from a
baseball point of view the owners on the bottom rung, those making the most
noise and causing the most trouble, are likely to end up losing their teams
because of the mess they have created.
Most likely they will sell them for $200 million each and walk away with
money falling out of their pockets unless they have other bills to pay, but
they will no longer be baseball owners.
George
|
63.983 | I'd play Pena..........really | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Fri Jun 30 1995 16:17 | 11 |
|
Paul....
You mean Sandy Alomar is going to fill a hole. He is the most
over-rated pro athlete in sports today. The only reason he makes
the mid season classic is because the casual/voting fan gets him
confused with his brother.
Jerry
|
63.984 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 30 1995 17:54 | 4 |
| > Well I suppose if you feel money is everything you have a point
That's what this labor problem is all about. It's certainly not about
the length of games or the height of the pitcher's mound.
|
63.985 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 30 1995 18:28 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 63.984 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>That's what this labor problem is all about. It's certainly not about
>the length of games or the height of the pitcher's mound.
No, this labor problem is not about money itself. It's about the right of
the players to negotiate with teams about their salary.
And the low end owners are not just complaining about money, they are
complaining about having the ability to own and operate their teams. They
claim they can not survive as baseball teams without a cap. With this strike
they have put owning their teams at far greater risk than if they had cut
a deal with the players and avoided the strike.
George
|
63.986 | Money is what matters for both sides | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Fri Jun 30 1995 19:28 | 12 |
| <<< Note 63.985 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
> No, this labor problem is not about money itself. It's about the right of
>the players to negotiate with teams about their salary.
> .....
> George
George, this whole thing is about money. Do you think the players are
demanding to be able to negotiate with other teams in the hopes of
getting a pay cut? No matter what business it is, it's business.
Kevin
|
63.987 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jun 30 1995 19:53 | 5 |
63.988 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jun 30 1995 19:54 | 4 |
63.989 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Sat Jul 01 1995 08:14 | 20 |
|
> You mean Sandy Alomar is going to fill a hole. He is the most
> over-rated pro athlete in sports today. The only reason he makes
> the mid season classic is because the casual/voting fan gets him
> confused with his brother.
Overrated? Well, maybe by all-star voters, but in general he's
been a very good catcher -when he's been healthy-. He's an above
average hitter for a catcher, and above average defensively. As
to the idea of starting Pena, I wouldn't in a million years - I'd
have started Levis over Pena, but for some reason Hargrove doesn't
like Levis. Pena's still an effective backup, but has nothing
left to offer as a starter.
Joe
w.r.t. 3000 hits; how many current Indians will finish their careers
with 3000 hits? I'd guess four - Winfield & Murray, of course, plus
Baerga & Ramirez.
|
63.990 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sat Jul 01 1995 08:44 | 7 |
63.991 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sun Jul 02 1995 09:18 | 3 |
63.992 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 03 1995 08:52 | 14 |
63.993 | You all really care about this, right? | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Mon Jul 03 1995 12:20 | 17 |
| This is an entertaining thread. It fascinates me how Groaner drags the
rest of you down to his argumentation level.
My pal Jeff and I dropped the White Sox as our AL team after the first three
weeks, because we got sick of watching them kick the ball around, and went
with the Indians. Been a lot of fun, and I've always loved watching Orel
Hershiser pitch. Looks funny in that Indian uniform, though.
In the NL, which has lesser players but better ball, we went with Atlanta,
except while I was in the States, figuring I could watch the Braves on TBS.
For those 4 weeks we took the Giants, whose defense is a pure joy to watch.
Our guiding principle in each league is: the best team playing on grass.
And we hope they can the DH, too.
Steve
|
63.994 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Tue Jul 04 1995 18:06 | 5 |
63.995 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 06 1995 08:21 | 8 |
63.1000 | heiser is a clown! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 06 1995 08:23 | 4 |
63.1001 | I'd hardley call 7-2 a stiff with a better era than Martinez | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Thu Jul 06 1995 09:29 | 8 |
|
I thought Martinez did make the team? If he didn't he got stiffed
but don't be callin Hanson a stiff. I know what you really said about
him.
Jerry
|
63.1002 | Open mouth insert (stinky)Foot | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Thu Jul 06 1995 09:35 | 7 |
|
Martinez is on the team. Groaner you are the biggest fountain of
misinformation I have ever seen.!
Chap
|
63.1003 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jul 06 1995 14:46 | 7 |
| Steve do you get a choice of teams to pick up on cable? I agree, nl
more entertaining even with a lesser talent base. Ironically the
stupid dh rule leads to tougher pitching in the al. Emphasis on
fastball in nl sometimes distorts player averages.
Now the Indians will have to decide which players to keep in the next
few years.
|
63.1004 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 06 1995 18:08 | 7 |
63.1005 | Frankie and trash for Aggie may not be a panic move but maybe | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Fri Jul 07 1995 08:25 | 4 |
|
Thats why I was asking why you callled him a stiff.
|
63.1006 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 07 1995 08:35 | 18 |
63.1007 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 07 1995 08:35 | 4 |
63.1008 | One giant leap for mankind | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Fri Jul 07 1995 08:55 | 20 |
| Billte, we subscribe to baseball on videotape, that's how we get a choice
of teams.
BUT for the last few weeks, NBC Super Channel has been showing a full length
game every Friday (actually Saturday in the wee smalls), on a half hour
tape delay. So far, every game has been American League (damn), using the
feed of one of the teams: twice the Red Sox, once the Orioles, twice the
Blue Jays, all of whom do a pretty good job. Of course NBC SC doesn't sell
anywhere near as much commercial time as a US station, especially at three
AM, so they fill up the space between innings praising the rest of their
catastrophic offering. The fast forward button gets even more of a
workout than next unseen.
I prefer NL ball for a number of reasons, of which only one is the DH.
I think umpiring is significantly better in the NL, for example, and by
and large so is managing (possibly a consequence of the DH). And I can't
prove this, but I have a powerful impression that National League pitchers
on average work faster.
Steve
|
63.1009 | Minnesota makes out | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Fri Jul 07 1995 09:27 | 9 |
|
>> re: .1005
>> The trash is Trot Nixon pal.
The Trash is Glenn Murry or Jose Malave.
|
63.1010 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Fri Jul 07 1995 09:42 | 23 |
|
If the "trash" is Trot Nixon, it hurts a lot less. Trot's full name
has become Trot Oh My Achin' Back Nixon.
If it's Malave, that hurts. But it's past July 4th, the Sox are in 1st -
you've got to live for today.
Enough about the Sox - this is the Indians note.
Ogea probably would have gotten an All-Star nod if he had been up in the
bigs and in the rotation all year to this point. (I believe he spent some
time in the minors - correct me if I'm wrong.)
So far, I've been very impressed with Ogea and Tavarez, but I have yet to
see what the big deal is with Albie Lopez.
Groaner, if you're a true Indians fan, you should be shot for mentioning
Martinez and Black in the same sentence. Bud can't hold Dennis' jock.
The only exception to the rule is if someone asks you to name the Indians'
rotation and Hargrove continues with the mental lapses that allow Black to
make starts for the Tribe.
Roland
|
63.1011 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 07 1995 10:20 | 14 |
|
While I'd agree that Black clearly isn't one of the Tribe's five
best starters (I'd pick Nagy, Martinez, Ogea, Tavarez, and Clark
among those who are healthy right now), it just doesn't matter much.
Black's been OK every other time out, awful the other, and that's
fine for now. For Hershiser comes back, Black probably goes
anyway (unless Clark relapses).
Given the lead & the lineup, I don't mind the don't-worry-be-happy
attitude. I'd start thinking about bringing up Bell, though, to
prepare him for the postseason (he seems the most likely candidate
for an extra backup infielder).
Joe
|
63.1012 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Fri Jul 07 1995 10:28 | 5 |
| > Black's been OK every other time out, awful the other, and that's
> fine for now. For Hershiser comes back, Black probably goes
> anyway (unless Clark relapses).
True enough. It's hard to lose when you get 8 runs a game... :-)
|
63.1013 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 07 1995 10:45 | 39 |
|
Yes, but Black's wins _haven't_ been the result of run support
(well, OK, certainly they have to some extent, but not in the
usual sense).
When Black hasn't had it, he's been _shelled_. 4+ runs in 3-
innings shelled. Hasn't even been close.
When Black has had it, he's been OK; with the Indians offense,
that's been plenty.
Black's lines:
Cleveland IP H R ER BB SO
A Black (L, 0-1) 2.2 7 5 3 1 1
B Black 2 9 6 6 1 0
C Black 6 2 0 0 1 7
D Black (W 1-1) 5 4 2 2 1 1
E Black 6 3 3 3 4 5
F BLACK (W, 2-1) 5.2 7 4 3 1 7
G Black (W, 3-1) 6 6 4 4 1 2
H Black (L 3-2) 2.1 7 7 3 3 1
I Black (W 4-2) 6 8 3 3 1 6
J Black 3.2 7 4 4 1 2
In starts A, B, H, and J, Black's got the following total line:
Cleveland IP H R ER BB SO
Black (0-2) 10.2 30 22 16 6 4 ERA - 13.5
In his other starts, Black's been much, much better:
Cleveland IP H R ER BB SO
Black (4-0) 34.2 30 16 15 9 28 ERA - 3.89
The second line is adequate reason to leave him in the rotation
for now, IMHO.
Joe
|
63.1014 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 07 1995 10:48 | 8 |
|
BTW, w.r.t. Black's run support:
In his good games - 6.5 runs/game.
In his bad games - 5.75 runs/game.
Joe
|
63.1015 | Indians will need lefties for postseason | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 07 1995 11:19 | 10 |
| Black = Left hander - All those nice stats and double digit leads are
nice but even granted Cleveland may be lucky enough to see the Redsox
in the playoffs they still have to worry about the Yankees and still
possibly the Blue Jays in the postseason (if Jays could just get rid of
Gaston).
They better have two lefthanders ready to go in those series and at
least the option of a lefty for Boston.
Of course Kansas City and Baltimore have ideas of their own.
|
63.1016 | have a clue! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 07 1995 11:25 | 7 |
63.1017 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 07 1995 11:26 | 1 |
| no I mean vs Yankees - what do you have from the portside, Paul?
|
63.1018 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 07 1995 11:28 | 16 |
63.1019 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Fri Jul 07 1995 11:47 | 9 |
|
The Yankees are the only team Paul and the other Indian fans
should worry about.
BECAUSE WE OWN THE TRIBE. Right Paul?
Chap
|
63.1020 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 07 1995 11:53 | 6 |
|
Actually, the Yankees no longer worry me.
The Braves, however, do.
Joe
|
63.1021 | It's a long time til October | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Fri Jul 07 1995 12:02 | 11 |
| Given that the Indians have been having a bit of trouble with lefthanded
pitching, I'd worry about the Angels.
Funny things happen in the postseason because an apparently superior team
(which Cleveland surely is) runs into an opponent that can exploit an
Achilles' heel. And in the postseason, a five-deep starting rotation
is not a necessity.
But of course, that assumes the Angels make it to the postseason.
Steve
|
63.1022 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 07 1995 13:28 | 18 |
63.1023 | dudes a stiff | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Fri Jul 07 1995 14:07 | 8 |
|
Paul....
Why did you put Alomar in there? He'll be hurt come 'off time.
Jerry
|
63.1024 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 07 1995 14:14 | 4 |
63.1025 | Sure you're praying you'll face Boston,not NY | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 07 1995 15:11 | 9 |
| Groaner,
So you are only worried about the Redsox? Naturally I root for the
old home town team but objectively the Yankees are the first big threat
to the Indians and then the Blue Jays (end repetition).
So who does Cleveland have as serious left-handed stoppers?
And is this a problem with reading comprehension or a problem that
Indians lovers don't want to deal with.
|
63.1026 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 07 1995 15:59 | 13 |
|
Just to be certain we're clear on things...
> So who does Cleveland have as serious left-handed stoppers?
Are you asking who the Indians have to _hit_ lefthanders, or
who the Indians have to _pitch_ _to_ lefthanders?
I'll assume the latter; Martinez, Ogea, Poole, Assenmacher, Plunk,
and Tavarez are all shutting lefties down; Hershiser might be, but
I don't have his stats.
Joe
|
63.1027 | Actually I think Bud Black is better than you think | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 07 1995 17:57 | 10 |
| No, I don't subscribe to that righty shutting lefty down, new age crap.
I want to know who the lefties are on Cleveland's staff that they can
use to shut down New York or even possibly Toronto.
Now there was some team that went all the way with all right-handers to
win world series etal but I can't think of it - perhaps Cleveland
itself had Feller,Wynn,Lemon,Garcia all righties and beat Yanks in '54.
But playing championship baseball without lefthanded starters is so
rare that it actually is trivia question material.
|
63.1028 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 07 1995 18:58 | 7 |
63.1029 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Sat Jul 08 1995 21:57 | 17 |
| Re .1027
Righthanders shutting lefties down is new-age?
I think your significantly overestimating platoon differential.
It certainly does exist, for most players, but in general it's
a relatively small effect. Platoons are used, when they are,
because either (a) you have two players for whom having the
platoon advantage pushes them from "poor" to "acceptable", or
(b) one or both of the players have extreme platoon differentials.
The Braves scare me more than any other team because they have
Maddux, Avery, and Smoltz. I don't care if they're righty, lefty,
ambidexrious, or throw with their feet - they can pitch, and good
pitching _can_ turn a short series.
JOe
|
63.1030 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sun Jul 09 1995 08:12 | 6 |
63.1031 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sun Jul 09 1995 08:13 | 5 |
63.1032 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sun Jul 09 1995 18:41 | 5 |
63.1033 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 10 1995 08:44 | 69 |
63.1034 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Jul 10 1995 09:22 | 7 |
|
Chad Ogea was sent to the minors. So that he would stay on his 5
day rotation and pitch. With the All-Star break and resetting of the
starting rotation. He would have had about a 10 day layoff. Chad will
be brought back up later this week.
Ron
|
63.1035 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Never ruin good vodka with a dairy product... | Mon Jul 10 1995 09:37 | 9 |
|
> Gee, now I see why they sent down Ogea and kept Bud Black in the
> rotation. I'm sorry, with the Indians offense you still need a
> guy that has decent stuff left. Bud Black is done. His > 6.00
> ERA proves the point.
Well, Joe H., I'm not alone...
Roland
|
63.1036 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 10 1995 09:41 | 14 |
|
Was just about to point out the same thing - Ogea wasn't demoted, so
much as kept busy.
Of course, there's a reasonable argument that he should be pitching
in the all-star game, but that's another matter.
btw, anyone else read how Showalter really wanted Naehring for the
all-star team? Thome gets far too little respect from lots of people,
it seems - his numbers would be the very _best_ among outfielders,
and he's playing a more difficult defensive position (well, maybe CF
is more difficult).
Joe
|
63.1037 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 10 1995 09:43 | 9 |
|
I never said Black was _good_, just that he's more useful than his
numbers would suggest.
The rotation after the break will include Martinez, Ogea, Nagy,
and Hershiser; the #5 spot will apparently be either Clark or
Black.
Joe
|
63.1038 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jul 10 1995 09:45 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1031 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same" >>>
> How good can the NL hitters be when guys like Jamie Navarro go
> for dirt in the AL to 7-2 in the NL. Sure, there's no DH, but
> I've got to believe that the hitting in the NL is significantly
> lower in quality than in the AL.
Well, that's a pretty small sample size. Castillo seems to be having a
winning year and Bullinger is 5-1 so it appears that at least for a while the
Cubs had something going. They've already dropped out of 1st and I suspect that
the league will figure out Navarro soon enough.
George
|
63.1039 | thome > Naehring | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 10 1995 10:05 | 9 |
63.1040 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 10 1995 10:11 | 4 |
63.1041 | What would we do with Sandy Koufax | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Jul 10 1995 10:28 | 4 |
| Well, the answer to my question, couched in wierd requests for stats on
one hand and more new-age baseball philosophy on the other hand is "No,
serious lefties, we can do without them - Stengel and the rest were
doing it with mirrors".
|
63.1042 | Lefties, righties, knuckleballers... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jul 10 1995 10:36 | 7 |
|
If the Sox face Cleveland in the first round, I'd just pitch Tim
Wakefield all 5 games if necessary. The power is negated, and
guys like Vizquel become the best hitters...
glenn
|
63.1043 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 10 1995 11:33 | 4 |
|
You know, Glenn, I think you just might have something.
Joe
|
63.1044 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Never ruin good vodka with a dairy product... | Mon Jul 10 1995 11:54 | 7 |
|
Now that McGwire is out, I hear they might bring in Cecil Fielder to replace
him. Now there's an *excellent* reason to be p.o.'ed about Thome not going.
AL All-Stars already have Thomas and Vaughn at 1B - might as well send the
most deserving cornerman. I'm a Red Sox fan, but I'd send Thome over Naehring.
Of course I think they should both be going, and Wade should be watching the
game during a barbecue in Tampa or something...
|
63.1045 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 10 1995 12:16 | 7 |
|
Cecil Fielder?
I'd rather have Valentin at bat for my team than Fielder, and I bet
Valentin would play a much better 1B to boot...
Joe
|
63.1046 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 10 1995 12:36 | 4 |
63.1047 | Valentin | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Never ruin good vodka with a dairy product... | Mon Jul 10 1995 12:48 | 5 |
|
...he hit his 14th HR last night.
Joe's right - he probably *would* play a better 1B than Cecil. So would
Thome. I'm hoping the Cecil thing is just rumor...
|
63.1048 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Jul 10 1995 14:52 | 19 |
|
Saying what has Valentin done lately is like saying what has
Cleveland done lately? Oh, they lost yesterday. Which must mean
that the slide has started. They are going to choke an 11 game
lead and not make the playoffs.
Both Thome and Valentin didn't make the All-Star team for the
same reasons Mo Vaughn didn't in previous years. Start putting up
the numbers year after year after year. Then you will go to the
All-Star game. With every team needing to be represented. Unless
the fans give you a lot of votes. It takes 3 quality years in a row
to make the All-Star team.
The only way to reduce the 3 years. Is to eliminate the fan
ballotting and let the players vote. Wade Boggs doesn't make it,
except for the fans. Which took a spot away from Thome/Naehring.
Stupid fan balloting is always taking spots aways from players.
Ron
|
63.1049 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 10 1995 15:36 | 22 |
|
Ron,
Nice theory, but...
1) Valentin _has_ put up three straight good years - he's been the
best offensive shortstop in the AL the past for a while now.
2) Thome's been putting up all-star type numbers for a third baseman
since the second half of 93 (he was in the minors in the first
half).
3) Ramirez made the all-star team this year, with less impressive
performances previously than either of them _and_ no more
impressive a performance this year, at a deeper offensive
position, no less.
4) Gary DiSarcina was named to the all-star team this year with
no positive offensive background; unlike Valentin, his numbers
appear completely out of whack with his career.
Joe
|
63.1050 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jul 10 1995 15:57 | 5 |
| > 1) Valentin _has_ put up three straight good years - he's been the
> best offensive shortstop in the AL the past for a while now.
JoeH, can you post these "good" numbers that Valentin has put up
for 3 straight years ? Ditto Thome....
|
63.1051 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jul 10 1995 15:59 | 12 |
| You guys keep forgetting, this is not a best-player game, it's an all-star
game. Some times the best players are also stars but other times they are not.
The idea is to get popular big name players together so both fans and semi-fans
will tune in to watch the comercials.
They know that the real fans who are up on who's having a hot 1st half and
who is not will tune in so why go out of the way to try to attract those guys?
They want to make sure the big name players from years past get selected so the
semi-fans who just got done watching hockey and basketball will tune in to
watch the game and to develope some interest for baseball's 2nd half.
George
|
63.1052 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Never ruin good vodka with a dairy product... | Mon Jul 10 1995 16:13 | 4 |
| > You guys keep forgetting, this is not a best-player game, it's an all-star
>game.
I don't think it's forgetting as much as lamenting...
|
63.1053 | tribe wins again... what else is new | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 10 1995 16:14 | 5 |
63.1054 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 10 1995 16:17 | 25 |
|
No, George, we aren't (or at least I'm not - I suppose I shouldn't
speak for others). While the idea of MLB might be as you say, what
_I_ want the game to be is a display of baseball's best players of
the moment (based, perhaps, 2/3 upon the first half of the current
season, 1/3 upon second half of the previous season).
w.r.t. Valentin & Thome:
Sure thing:
1993
Thome - .385 OBP, .474 SLG (154 AB)
Valentin - .346 OBP, .447 SLG
No regular SS (arbitrary minimum of 90 games at SS) had a higher
OBP or SLG than Valentin.
1994
Thome - .354 OBP, .516 SLG
Valentin - .405 OBP, .514 SLG
Joe
|
63.1055 | How about Murray then at 1b | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Jul 10 1995 17:04 | 11 |
|
I lean more to George's view - let the up and comers establish
themselves for a year or two unless the player is a Fred Lynn.
One Cleveland player who would qualify and be a great substitute for
McGuire would be Murray.
The other thing is the one player from each team goal vs trying to win
the game - Showalter has a clear idea in his mind of the type of player
he wants out there and from reading Gammons, DiScarcina is that type.
Now in Fenway, Naehring and Valentin are definitely the types.
|
63.1056 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 10 1995 17:08 | 5 |
|
Murray's injured, so it doesn't matter anyway, but he'd be an
even worse choice than Cecil.
Joe
|
63.1057 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 14 1995 09:15 | 37 |
63.1058 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 14 1995 09:38 | 10 |
63.1059 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Jul 14 1995 09:44 | 5 |
|
Where is Jaret Wright pitching? I've heard of the other two, but not him.
Having seen Albie Lopez, I think I could part with him for the right deal.
I have no idea about Wright and Colon.
|
63.1060 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 14 1995 09:54 | 3 |
63.1061 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Fri Jul 14 1995 11:21 | 9 |
| Wright I believe was the Indians #1 pick in the amatuer draft last
year. His father I believe used to pitch for tha Angels. Indians gave
him some big bucks to sign. I don't think the Indians need another
pitcher. Why trade 3 of their pitching prospects when they have
Martinez and Hersheiser getting up in years. While both of them are
very good pitchers when Wright and Colon are ready both of these should
be done.
Mike
|
63.1062 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Jul 14 1995 11:35 | 6 |
| > Wright I believe was the Indians #1 pick in the amatuer draft last
> year. His father I believe used to pitch for tha Angels.
I remember him. Clyde Wright. I used to have his baseball card.
I hope the son is a better pitcher... :-)
|
63.1063 | Feel free not to accept conventional wisdom | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Fri Jul 14 1995 12:16 | 11 |
| The conventional wisdom in baseball says:
If you have a chance to win it all now, and you have a chance
to get one player who can put you over the top by sacrificing
the future, do it. That future may never come, so if you can
see the brass ring, grab for it.
No doubt David Cone would make the Indians (even) stronger. My question
is: aren't they already strong enough?
Steve
|
63.1064 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Fri Jul 14 1995 12:49 | 11 |
|
No the Indians are not strong enough. The best thing they could do
is get Cone so noone else can pick him up. The Yankees have beaten the
Snot out of Cleveland for the past 1.5 - 2 years. They are the only AL
Team that Cleveland Dreads seeing come playoff time. Thats why Groaner
hates the Sox cuz he know Cleveland will roll over Boston but get
rolled by NY!!!
Chap
|
63.1065 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 14 1995 13:54 | 33 |
|
Chappy,
> No the Indians are not strong enough. The best thing they could do
> is get Cone so noone else can pick him up.
The best thing if you don't want to see a dynasty in Cleveland, of
course.
> The Yankees have beaten the
> Snot out of Cleveland for the past 1.5 - 2 years.
Chappy, since when did 16 games become a significant sample size?
Yes, NY swept Cleveland last year. NY was a much better team
last year, and Cleveland was somewhat weaker. This year, Cleveland
has won 2 of 4 and NY has won 2 of 4.
> They are the only AL Team that Cleveland Dreads seeing come playoff
> time.
Oh, yeah, the Braves don't scare me at all.
Tell you what, Chappy - I'll bet you a months worth of Personal
Names that, should by some miracle the Yankees actually make the
playoffs, and should the Yankees & Indians meet in the playoffs,
the Indians will win.
If the teams don't meet in the playoffs, no one loses.
Heck, if you want, I'll _also_ bet a weeks worth of PNames on
the season series record between the teams.
Joe
|
63.1066 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 14 1995 14:16 | 15 |
| One reason to get Cone is that while it takes a lot of good pitchers to get
to the playoffs, it takes a few great pitchers to win them. This is due to the
extra days of rest for travel and due to the fact that there are no weak teams
that allow those 4.500 - 6.00 type pitchers to pick up a few wins.
If you look at the Indians pitching staff everyone is pretty good but after
Martinez with his 2.36 ERA and Nagy with his 3.62 ERA the starters get a little
thin. Good but not great, especially if they end up playing against Maddux,
Smoltz, Glavine, Avery in the World Series.
Throwing Cone in there would give them a championship playoff rotation of
Martinez, Cone, Nagy, whoever which could compete with anyone over a short
series.
George
|
63.1067 | history repeats | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jul 14 1995 14:21 | 5 |
63.1068 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 14 1995 14:23 | 12 |
|
> If you look at the Indians pitching staff everyone is pretty good but after
> Martinez with his 2.36 ERA and Nagy with his 3.62 ERA the starters get a
> little thin.
Well, there is always Ogea with his 2.19 ERA...
I'd like to have Cone. I would trade Embree to get Cone. I
might consider trading Wright to get Cone. I would not trade
Colon to get Cone, and probably not Ogea...
Joe
|
63.1070 | mike still sore because one of his many favs choked! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 14 1995 14:25 | 7 |
63.1071 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 14 1995 14:26 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1067 by OUTSRC::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>
> What year was it that the Clevescum Indians were the "best team in
> baseball" and were swept in the Word Series? '54?
Yes, in '54 they were swept in 4 by the Giants. That was Willie Mays' rookie
year. In '48 they beat the Braves in 6 after beating the Red Sox in a playoff
spoiling the all Boston World Series.
George
|
63.1072 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 14 1995 14:29 | 15 |
63.1073 | Las Vegas thinks the Tribe can win now... | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Fri Jul 14 1995 14:39 | 21 |
|
Well it looks like Las Vegas thinks the Tribe. Can win without
adding anybody to the roster.
Odds on winning pennant Odds on winning W.S.
Indians Even 2-1
Braves 2-1 4-1
Reds 5-2 5-2
Red Sox 4-1 7-1
Rockies 5-1 12-1
Phillies 6-1 12-1
Orioles 7-1 15-1
Astros 7-1 15-1
Angels 8-1 15-1
Rangers 8-1 15-1
Yankees 8-1 15-1
Ron
|
63.1074 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Jul 14 1995 15:36 | 4 |
|
Orioles 7-1 and Tigers not mentioned?
Oops, I forgot. This is the line - it's meant to drum up interest...
|
63.1075 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 14 1995 16:32 | 8 |
|
Why would the Tigers be mentioned?
The only one that really stands out to me in Colorado; the Rockies
offense is pretty bad, and the pitching doesn't seem quite good
enough to make up for the (though it is pretty good)...
Joe
|
63.1076 | leading the divison by 5 games | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Cooties, no cooties on me!! | Fri Jul 14 1995 16:52 | 5 |
|
Yea their offense is terrible. Three in top 5 for homers. More than
half the starting 9 hitting over 300. The best pinch hitter in MLB
17-36, that some terrible offense all right.
|
63.1077 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Jul 14 1995 16:53 | 12 |
| > Why would the Tigers be mentioned?
They're ahead of the Orioles in the standings (2nd place vs. 3rd).
> The only one that really stands out to me in Colorado; the Rockies
> offense is pretty bad, and the pitching doesn't seem quite good
> enough to make up for the (though it is pretty good)...
Are you sure you didn't reverse the words "offense" and "pitching" in
this paragraph? Galarraga, Bichette, Walker, Hayes, and Castilla is a
decent start to an offense.
|
63.1078 | CADZILLA COLLISION! | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Jul 14 1995 16:54 | 0 |
63.1079 | 1954 was a year of justice | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jul 14 1995 17:08 | 2 |
63.1080 | no more Charlie | LOCK::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Fri Jul 14 1995 17:22 | 4 |
|
Hayes went to Philly.....
Claybone
|
63.1081 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 14 1995 17:31 | 61 |
|
>> Why would the Tigers be mentioned?
>They're ahead of the Orioles in the standings (2nd place vs. 3rd).
>> The only one that really stands out to me in Colorado; the Rockies
>> offense is pretty bad, and the pitching doesn't seem quite good
>> enough to make up for the (though it is pretty good)...
>Are you sure you didn't reverse the words "offense" and "pitching" in
>this paragraph? Galarraga, Bichette, Walker, Hayes, and Castilla is a
>decent start to an offense.
No, I didn't.
Colorado's record, to this point, can be best attributed to their
strong pitching.
Their offense is among the _worst_ in the NL.
You see, Colorado does things to offense not seen in years - it has
a _huge_ effect upon offense, a far larger positive effect than
the Astrodome's negative effect.
At home, Colorado scores ~7 runs a game, and gives up ~6.
On the road, Colorado scores ~3 runs a game, and gives up ~4.
3 runs a game is _pathetic_.
Home vs. Road stats for the Rockies:
Walker: Home - .419 OBP, .776 SLG
Away - .350 OBP, .472 SLG
Gallaraga: Home - .378 OBP, .586 SLG
Away - .323 OBP, .521 SLG
Bichette: Home - .410 OBP, .732 SLG
Away - .318 OBP, .366 SLG
Unfortunately, I don't have OBP & SLG split home and road for the
others, but even just batting average:
Bates - .344 home, .194 road
Castilla - .371 home, .264 road
Weiss - .277 home, .223 road
Kingery - .243 home, .317 road (yes, he's backwards)
Girardi - .324 home, .245 road
Meanwhile, a pitching staff that gives up 4 runs a game in a neutral
park is pretty good; a staff that gives up 6 runs a game in Colorado
is also pretty good.
An offense that scores 3 runs/game on the road, and 7 a game in Denver
is, on the whole, below average - 7 runs a game in Denver is an
average figure, 3 runs/game on the road well below average, so what
else, on the whole, can a combination of the two be besides below
average?
Joe
|
63.1082 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sat Jul 15 1995 09:03 | 13 |
63.1083 | 1-0 must a been a great game to watch. | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Sat Jul 15 1995 09:43 | 9 |
|
Lopez pitched 2/3 of an inning in the second game. I wouldn't make
any assumptions yet.
Jerry
but I could have read the line wrong this morning it twas early
|
63.1084 | I mean bottleRocket | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sat Jul 15 1995 11:03 | 4 |
63.1085 | startin to think rog is cooked | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Sat Jul 15 1995 11:30 | 3 |
|
nope a little better than that.
|
63.1086 | .700 is okay, but not great | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sun Jul 16 1995 19:29 | 7 |
63.1087 | .750 maybe not .800 | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Mon Jul 17 1995 08:09 | 7 |
|
Paul if the Tribe crashes and burns (I personally don't think it will
happen but one can hope) you are going to be taking monumental portions
of crow.
Jerry
|
63.1088 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 17 1995 08:42 | 8 |
63.1089 | Lefty - lefty not working these days | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Jul 17 1995 10:22 | 15 |
| I have to second guess myself and wonder if Joe Huber is right about
the current effectiveness of lefthanded pitching, especially against
lefthanded batters. KK had despaired of ever seeing Lilliquist do the
job, ESPN nightly shows lefties shelled by lefties.
Part of the problem may be lefties developing pitches specifically for
righthanded batters and possibly just assuming their normal stuff will
get out righties. Also lefthanded batters may be more determined to
hit lefties in order to stay in the lineup at the salaries a full time
player earns.
I don't know the answer but Hargrove can't be faulted for staying with
the best pitchers regardeless of the side their slinging from.
billte
|
63.1090 | Been studied many times | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Mon Jul 17 1995 11:53 | 7 |
| Bill, I'll bet that, when the season is over and the sabermetric books
hit the stands, you'll see that the platoon still holds up overall.
Every year there are a few anomalies, but most of them revert to pattern
the following season. Historically, there are very, very few exceptions
to the old "right vs. left" saw.
Steve
|
63.1091 | It's a righthanded thinking world today | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Jul 17 1995 15:17 | 19 |
| Well here would be some thoughts as to how the basic assumptions around
right vs left could be affected:
1. Fewer if any out and out beanballs. Even the message pitches
are thrown over the head. Both lefties and righties are
staying in more and more (except when Randy Johnson is
pitching.
2. Umpiring. Not sure why but I believe the national league
method of looking over the should instead of straight down
is in use in both leagues.
3. Types of pitches. Lefties used to use the big sweeping curve
to great advantage. Most lefties today seem to use some
kind of screwball to be effective with righties.
Different managers, catchers, different mindset.
|
63.1092 | Just a touch of humor by S.I. | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | Oh flight attendent! | Tue Jul 18 1995 05:01 | 4 |
| Sports Illusrated July 10, 1995. Hideo Nomo is on the cover.
Open to pages 24-25, Notice scoreboard in background.
Lil Ed
|
63.1093 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jul 19 1995 08:21 | 8 |
63.1094 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Wed Jul 19 1995 09:48 | 6 |
| > Soon Cleveland will have to spot teams 10 runs to make it close.
Then the Angels would have beat them 17 or 18 to 3 the night before last...
It's all still foolishness at this point, but what does Cleveland's record
project to over the "full" schedule?
|
63.1095 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jul 19 1995 09:50 | 11 |
|
Well, they've got a .699 winning percentage as of this morning,
so...
In 144 games, they'd win 101.
In 154 games, they'd win 108.
In 162 games, they'd win 113.
Joe
|
63.1096 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Wed Jul 19 1995 10:01 | 3 |
| > In 144 games, they'd win 101.
Winning over 100 games in a shorter schedule *would* be pretty impressive.
|
63.1097 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Wed Jul 19 1995 14:32 | 21 |
|
C L E V E L A N D I N D I A N S
Once again.......bottom of the ninth......ITS OUT OF HERE!
THE CLEVELAND INDIANS WIN THE GAME!!!
THE CLEVELAND INDIANS WIN THE GAME!!!
I watched "Major League" again yesterday....the boy just
can't get enough.
Does anyone not cry at the end of the game???
The Chief,
WAHOOOOOOOO!
|
63.1098 | RE: .1097 | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Wed Jul 19 1995 14:56 | 7 |
|
Congratulations, Groaner. You now look like a model of impartiality and
restraint.
Question of the Day: Does Hal know that Charlie Sheen is not in the Indians
rotation?
|
63.1099 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Wed Jul 19 1995 16:30 | 8 |
|
>Question of the Day: Does Hal know that Charlie Sheen is not in the
Indians rotation?
Of course he does, he's in the bullpen 8^)
Marc
|
63.1100 | Hal's Back Snarf | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Jul 20 1995 09:47 | 3 |
| I guess the summer just wouldn't have been complete without the man.
zamboni
|
63.1101 | now back to the regularly scheduled junk | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 20 1995 10:06 | 6 |
63.1102 | Donks == Burros | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Jul 20 1995 15:47 | 16 |
| > donks sip.
You think they'll be that good this year iceMan?
I haven't seen anything to make me jump up and down about them this season.
All we can pray for is Johnny Boy has a mirculous year as a drop back passer.
FWIW. Paul has been a red, white and blue Indians fan forever. Browns too, but
Brown and Orange there. Definitely no bandwagoning on his part for those two
teams.
Personally I'm looking forward to 8/1 when my personal baseball strike ends and
I can check out what's what with these Indians. Ain't jumping on their wagon,
just want to size them up for the Sox/Indiams playoff clash!
zamboni
|
63.1103 | 14-3 VICTORY OVER TEXAS ON THE ROAD... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Thu Jul 20 1995 16:23 | 26 |
|
W A H O O O O O O O O O
The Tribe does it again....but last night was a "team" thing...
Love watching ESPN in the morning. #1 batter for the Indians
2 hits, 2 runs, 2 RBI'S, #2 batter for the Indians: 3 hits, 2
RBI's, etc, etc.....#6 batter for the Indians: 1 HR, 3 hits, 4 RBI's,
#7 batter for the Indians: 4 hits, 5 RBI's, and the list went on...and
on.... God I wish I lived in or near Cleveland for the rest of this
season just to experience what is happening to the team/city right now.
I wana go home!
Talked to dear ole Mom the other day and thanked her for the flag.
and, wouldn't you know it, it looks F___ing good in my front yard!
I have been taking it everywhere...the beach...camping...everywhere!
I even tied it to my Jeep when I go to parties. I love it! Cleveland
Indians!!!
Later...
The Chief,
WAHOOOOOOOO!
|
63.1104 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Thu Jul 20 1995 16:50 | 15 |
| > I wana go home!
If you ask nicely, we might take up a collection, as long as there are no
places to log in from there...
> Talked to dear ole Mom the other day and thanked her for the flag.
> and, wouldn't you know it, it looks F___ing good in my front yard!
Is this the same flag you were complaining about as too big? Shame on you,
you should have known that Mom knows best...
Hal, people would treat you with more respect if you at least named the #2, #6,
and #7 hitters for the Indians before crowing about them.
Are they Vizquel (#2), Ramirez (#6), and Thome (#7)?
|
63.1105 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 20 1995 17:10 | 2 |
63.1106 | only boston loses to texas | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 20 1995 17:10 | 3 |
63.1107 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 20 1995 17:39 | 3 |
63.1108 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 20 1995 17:39 | 3 |
63.1109 | another one bites the dust... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Thu Jul 20 1995 18:18 | 6 |
|
So, did they win......again?
the Chief,
WaHooooooooo!
|
63.1110 | To Oakland for a couple.... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Fri Jul 21 1995 08:38 | 13 |
|
What a stupid question Aeeeeeee.......
The Tribe takes Texas in over 100 degree temps 6-3.
Batter #9 Sandy Alomar hist 2 home runs and is todays
player of the game.....
Batter #2 Omar Visquell (SP) was runner up.
The Chief
Wahoooooooo!
|
63.1111 | | PSDVAX::ROBICHAUD | Don'tTakeComedyFromStrangers | Fri Jul 21 1995 08:58 | 4 |
| Man this Indians team looks unstoppable. Should be an easy romp to
a world title.
/Don
|
63.1112 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Fri Jul 21 1995 09:16 | 6 |
| > Man this Indians team looks unstoppable. Should be an easy romp to
> a world title.
Anything less would be a major choke job.
|
63.1113 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 21 1995 10:11 | 5 |
63.1114 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Reasonable summer rates | Fri Jul 21 1995 10:13 | 4 |
| re .1113 - So I guess I'll have more than just one p-name bet on the WS
when the Sox meet the Braves?
UMDan
|
63.1115 | post-season blunders await... | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jul 21 1995 10:58 | 11 |
| > Sox favored to win the WS, if the Indians beat Boston it would be a
> miracle.
Red Sox or Indians are destined to be the answer to a trivia question:
"Which division winner was the first to lose to a wildcard team ?"
Hopefully it will be Boston. Cleveland will go further down the Hall of
Futility when "the greatest hitting lineup of all-time" doesn't win the
AL pennant and get to the WS.
|
63.1116 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Fri Jul 21 1995 11:58 | 36 |
| Who knows what team Paul will be picking for the WS in 2 Weeks?
Could he be losing faith in his team?
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.1053 CLEVELAND INDIANS 1053 of 1115
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same" 5 lines 10-JUL-1995 15:14
-< tribe wins again... what else is new >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What else is there to talk about in the Indians note, the question is
who will cleveland beat in round 1, in the ALCS and in the WS. Other
than that, the rest is boring.
==========================================================================
Note 63.1113 CLEVELAND INDIANS 1113 of 1115
ROCK::GRONOWSKI "The dream is always the same" 5 lines 21-JUL-1995 09:11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sox favored to win the WS, if the Indians beat Boston it would be a
miracle. Clemens - future hall of famer, Hanson, Wakefield, Aggie,
Canseco, Greenwell - these guys are all -world.
|
63.1117 | How's your 'robe' fit? | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Fri Jul 21 1995 12:49 | 13 |
| Hal,
I'm suprized that a "die-hard" Cleveland fan like yourself
wouldn't have been flying that Indians flag even through
the lean years.
It's not at all like you, or your clone, Groaner, to woop
it up only when the CLeveland team of the moment does well.
many ;^)
billl
|
63.1118 | May well decide who I'm rooting for in October | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Fri Jul 21 1995 13:31 | 14 |
| I can't figure out which will be more obnoxious:
Hal and Paul if the Indians win everything
or
The rest of you feeding them crow if they don't.
But then there's Joe H, living and dying with his Indians and actually
knowing what he's talking about.
Hmmmm. It's going to be a tough call.
Steve
|
63.1119 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 21 1995 13:56 | 3 |
63.1120 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:29 | 16 |
| >
> Trust me, this conference will get closed down if the Indians win.
> I'm already working on the batch noting procedure.
>
I beg your pardon.
I didn't close it down when the Rockets won the NBA championship, nor when the
Devils won the Stanley Cup.
I'm not planning on shutting it down should the Indians win the series....
'Saw
|
63.1121 | :^o | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:33 | 4 |
| > Trust me, this conference will get closed down if the Indians win.
> I'm already working on the batch noting procedure.
Another Digital "application" that will never get used.
|
63.1122 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jul 21 1995 17:38 | 2 |
63.1123 | 2 MORE DINGERS | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Sat Jul 22 1995 11:16 | 42 |
|
The Tribe does it again.......6-1 over Oakland.
Martinezz gets the win for his 9th. Now 9 and 0 for the season
he remains in the running for the cy-young award.
Player of the game...tough one here today but have to give it
to Albert Belle who smacked another HR and went 2 for 4 on the day.
2nd place player of the game is Manny who also hit another HR
which ups his home run total to 22. Also, 2nd place play of the game
is Tomme who when 2 for 4 and had 3 RBI's for the day.
The team has gone 8 for 9 since the all star break and is now again
the hottest team in the major leagues!
There is no stopping this team. The city goes crazy! No
murchandise to be had ... anywhere!
Tickets wanted......any Cleveland Indian home game...
Reports from Cleveland is that there are only 40,000 tickets
remaining for the rest of the season. Thats right...only 40,000
tickets for the remaining home games. Scalping is at an all time
high. People are paying outragous prices for Cleveland home tickets.
The only ballpark to sellout every game! There is no comparison!
The bandwaggon is full but here comes the bus. Don't worry, we'll
make room in this notes file. Has to be a record...what note is this??
2000....COME ONE, COME ALL....
W E L C O M E T O T H E S H O W
WAAAHOOOOOOO!!
THE CHIEF
|
63.1124 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sat Jul 22 1995 11:23 | 4 |
63.1125 | cleveland has won 13 straight v.s. oakland | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sat Jul 22 1995 21:29 | 5 |
63.1126 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Sun Jul 23 1995 10:56 | 10 |
63.1127 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 24 1995 08:51 | 5 |
|
Agreed. I might see trading Perry & Jackson for a pitcher, but not
for Ken Hill, and certainly not those two _and_ Bell...
Joe
|
63.1128 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Jul 24 1995 12:38 | 28 |
|
If I can remember what I read in the Globe yesterday. Here
is how the playoffs will work in baseball this year.
The easy part is that the 3 division winners make the players. With
the wild-card team being the team with the best record. As of today it
would be California, Cleveland, Boston, and Texas.
The wild-card team can not face a division opponent in the 1st
round. A wild-card team can not have home field advantage in the 1st
round, even if they have a better record then a division winner. In
a 5 games series (1st round), The East and West division's will have
home field advantage.
Which currently leaves us with the following. Texas can not face
California in the 1st round (same division). Texas can not face Cleveland
in the 1st round (Wild card can't be home team, Cleveland is not in the
East or West, so they can't be home team.)
Since Texas can't face California or Cleveland, they would face
the Red Sox in the 1st round. Cleveland would face California, with
California being the home team.
The home teams play the first 2 games on the road, with games 3,
4, and 5 at home. So if the playoffs started today. Cleveland would
face California, with games 1 and 2 in Cleveland. With games 3, 4, and
5 in California if necessary. Boston would face Texas, with games 1
and 2 in Texas. With gams 3, 4, and 5 in Boston if necessary.
So there is a real possibility that Cleveland. Could finish the
regular season with the best record in baseball. Yet, still not have
home field advantage during the 1st round of the playoffs.
Ron
|
63.1129 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Mon Jul 24 1995 12:58 | 16 |
| > In
> a 5 games series (1st round), The East and West division's will have
> home field advantage.
This, to me, is positively bizarre. Why are these arbitrarily defined?
The most reasonable thing, to me, is:
o wild card can't have home field
o wild card has to play division winner with best record
o division winner with 2nd best record (of division winners) has
HFA against remaining division winner
and that's it. None of this "so-and-so division winner gets HFA in 199x..."
Roland
|
63.1130 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jul 24 1995 14:03 | 7 |
| Baseball has never given home field advantage to the team with the better
record. In the past they have always alternated between the two divisions.
That's not to say it's right or wrong but that probably factored into the
current system that makes it depend on the division instead of the record.
George
|
63.1131 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 24 1995 14:08 | 34 |
63.1132 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Jul 24 1995 14:48 | 13 |
|
.1131,
>>> This statement is wrong "So there is a real possibility that
>>> Cleveland. Could finish the regular season with the best
>>> record in baseball. Yet, still not have home field advantage
>>> during the 1st round of the playoffs."
How can that statement be wrong? The rest of your note prooves
that the statement is correct. Did you miss the "still NOT have"
part of my note?
Ron
|
63.1133 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jul 24 1995 16:38 | 9 |
| >>> This statement is wrong "So there is a real possibility that
>>> Cleveland. Could finish the regular season with the best
>>> record in baseball. Yet, still not have home field advantage
>>> during the 1st round of the playoffs."
> How can that statement be wrong? The rest of your note prooves
Ron, your statement uses "possibility". It is not a possibility.
It WILL happen.
|
63.1134 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 24 1995 16:41 | 9 |
|
I think the "possible" in Ron's "possibility" refers to the Indians
having the best record in baseball, not the Indians playing on the
road in the playoffs.
The Indians haven't clinched the best record in baseball quite yet...
B^)
Joe
|
63.1135 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Mon Jul 24 1995 16:46 | 3 |
| I disagree. It's possible that Cleveland might not have the best record
come playoff time. (possible not probable)So Ron's statement is correct!
|
63.1136 | But they won't win the pennant anyway !!! | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jul 24 1995 16:49 | 2 |
| didn't see the "best record" part...or maybe even I have accepted it as
a foregone conclusion.
|
63.1137 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Tue Jul 25 1995 11:57 | 5 |
63.1138 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Jul 25 1995 12:44 | 6 |
| > Gregg Olson sold to Omaha (KC - AA affiliate).
I saw this. What do you Tribe fans think of this? I don't think he's any
great shakes anymore, but at least he was some form of insurance if something
happened to Mesa. Have the Indians publicized what their backup plan would
be if Mesa gets hurt?
|
63.1139 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 25 1995 14:54 | 9 |
|
Personally, it's no big deal. There just wasn't room for Olson
on the major league roster given Mesa's success.
The Indians haven't publicized a backup plan, but Plunk or Tavarez
would seem the most likely candidates; Shuey might get consideration,
too, I suppose.
Joe
|
63.1140 | asking the top baseball mind I know | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jul 25 1995 15:04 | 3 |
| It would seem that if they need Olsen they just retrieve him from the
minors. To have sent him down he has to be available to any other
club, right Groaner?
|
63.1141 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Jul 25 1995 15:37 | 6 |
|
No, Bill, he's with Omaha now - the *Royals* farm club. He's not Indians'
property anymore...
What surprised me was that I saw "sold" somewhere in the transaction. Why
not at least get a body (a middling prospect?) for him?
|
63.1142 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Tue Jul 25 1995 18:43 | 13 |
63.1143 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jul 26 1995 08:15 | 4 |
63.1144 | just for reference billl... you'll be visiting note 50 soon | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jul 26 1995 09:02 | 14 |
63.1145 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jul 26 1995 09:03 | 5 |
63.1146 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jul 26 1995 09:36 | 6 |
|
Now aren't _those_ statistically significant statistics...
How about SLG & OBP numbers?
Joe
|
63.1147 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Wed Jul 26 1995 10:21 | 13 |
| > Over the past 5 weeks:
>
> Omar Vizquel hitting .277
> John Valentin hitting .209
Groaner, do you have any other amusing "random time slices"? For all the
things you say about Heiser, you'd do him proud...
When it's all over and done, we can list all of the numbers, offensive and
defensive, and compare.
I still have no idea *what* you have against John Valentin. Did he rob you
of a base hit in grade school or something?
|
63.1148 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Jul 26 1995 10:22 | 5 |
| One thing's fer sure, Groaner, one of us will be dining on some crow
in October.
billl
|
63.1149 | Go Yanks? Did I say that? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Jul 26 1995 12:54 | 13 |
| Well those Indians certainly are an exciting team with those comebacks.
They couldn't get by ol' Lee Smith last night - this guy ironically is
looking like a surer bet for the hof than his old teammate Clemens.
Watch out for the Yankees they are becoming one driven team thanks to
the ultimate idiot George S. who's forced his team to circle the
wagons. The things Steinbrainless says "Buck needs to tell the press
what he tells the team in closed meetings" - if George wanted to hire
an idiot to manage his team he should have searched the Boston
organization.
But Donny is hot, the Yanks are driven - Chappy forward me a yankee
bandwagon application will ya.
|
63.1150 | Going, going, GONE! | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Jul 26 1995 13:35 | 9 |
| >I still have no idea *what* you have against John Valentin. Did he rob you
>of a base hit in grade school or something?
Nah,
More likely Valentin hit an IceMan offering DEEP and OUTTA the ball
yard to win the game in grade school.
zamboni
|
63.1151 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Jul 26 1995 13:49 | 1 |
63.1152 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Mich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &1beer | Wed Jul 26 1995 13:54 | 15 |
| >KFSA::LONG ""just keep it between the lines"" 8 lines 14-JAN-1993
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>re: winning it all in two years...
> Hal,
>Just for future reference, and I think you'll need it,
>the Crow Cafe is now note 50.
Lemme help you with the math here, Groaner. It's more than two years,
and Hal ought trot over to #50. Where do you get the time to go back
two+ years and dig these things up anyway?
brews
|
63.1153 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jul 26 1995 14:22 | 10 |
63.1154 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jul 26 1995 14:25 | 12 |
63.1155 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Mich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &1beer | Wed Jul 26 1995 14:36 | 5 |
|
Sorry Groaner, I only read what was posted. I don't have time to go
back through notes that are over 2 1/2 years old.
brews
|
63.1156 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Jul 26 1995 20:24 | 3 |
63.1157 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Jul 26 1995 21:42 | 13 |
63.1158 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 27 1995 10:31 | 23 |
63.1159 | Let the sandbaggin' begin! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Thu Jul 27 1995 11:05 | 6 |
| Looks to me like the Tribe is a LOCK for a WS appearance!
billl
|
63.1160 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jul 27 1995 12:09 | 14 |
| > Cleveland's record this year v.s. other playoff potentials
TOTAL HOME ROAD Remaining
> New York 2-2 0-0 2-2 3H,4R
> Nice scheduling 11 games v.s. NYY - 8 in NY.
Groaner, you shock me. The Cle is 1-0 at Yankee Stadium and 1-2 in Cle.
And they have 8 remaining, 5 in NY !
BTW, no way Calif gets to the ALCS. Lee Smith will cough-up a couple
of playoff games. And kids don't usually hit when they get to post-season.
|
63.1161 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 27 1995 14:42 | 8 |
63.1162 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 27 1995 14:43 | 6 |
63.1163 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jul 27 1995 15:37 | 4 |
| > but, according to ESPN
> web page, they have 7 games remaining.
They don't have the re-scheduled rain-out of 5/17 in their schedule.
|
63.1164 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 27 1995 21:55 | 14 |
63.1165 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 27 1995 23:41 | 12 |
63.1166 | | PUSH::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 28 1995 09:22 | 2 |
|
Tribe blows 5-0 lead and loses 11-5.
|
63.1167 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Jul 28 1995 09:54 | 12 |
| > The Angels also made a deal sending 4 minor leaguers including
> Andrew Lorraine to Chicago for Rick Fortugno and Jim Abbott.
This trade will haunt them down the line. Abbott has been pretty mediocre
the last couple of years (although I confess I don't know how he's doing this
year). Fortugno was a career minor leaguer who finally made it to the bigs
in his early 30's. Andrew Lorraine is going to be a really good pitcher.
(Yes, Paul, you can point to this two years from now and point me in the
direction of the Crow Cafe...)
Roland
|
63.1168 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jul 28 1995 16:19 | 1 |
63.1169 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 28 1995 17:36 | 3 |
63.1170 | 3 is enough | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Fri Jul 28 1995 17:57 | 8 |
|
I hate it when the Tribe loses!!!
The Chief.....
WaBooooooobooooooooboooooooo
|
63.1171 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jul 28 1995 18:17 | 2 |
63.1172 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Fri Jul 28 1995 19:53 | 9 |
|
David Cone has been traded to?
The New York Yankees for 3 minor league pitchers.
Ron
|
63.1173 | ABTS-BTC! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 28 1995 21:03 | 2 |
63.1174 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 31 1995 10:36 | 10 |
|
My thoughts on the Hill deal...
It could have been worse.
If Hill regains his form, it's an OK deal.
If he continues to pitch like he has this year, though...
Joe
|
63.1175 | Might not have been his problem | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Mon Jul 31 1995 12:03 | 6 |
| I suspect Hill's numbers were inflated by the Cardinals' uncharacteristically
terrible defense.
We'll find out soon enough.
Steve
|
63.1176 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 31 1995 12:15 | 9 |
|
Hmmm...
Error-prone defense will lower ERAs; only low-range defense really
raises ERAs (though that might be what the Cards have).
Of course, playing in Busch _will_ lower ERAs, too...
Joe
|
63.1177 | Watch Joey Belle corkscrew himself into the ground... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Aug 07 1995 14:29 | 9 |
|
Anyone going down to Fenway tomorrow night to see The Amazing Tim
Wakefield go against that much-feared Tribe lineup? I don't have
tix but I think this is a matchup that I just can't miss. An early
test of my theory that the Sox should send Wakefield out there for
Games 1-3-5 of any first-round wildcard series...
glenn
|
63.1178 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Mon Aug 07 1995 14:34 | 13 |
| >Watch Joey Belle corkscrew himself into the ground...
Yeah, Glenn, but what if he connects on the way down?
BTW - his name is Albert, has been for a couple of years. We're sending
him over to your house to explain it to you... :-)
I don't know if it's a test of 1-3-5, more a test of 1. I keep thinking
Wakefield is going to come back to earth, and he keeps hanging up these
amazing pitching lines...
Roland
|
63.1179 | He may smash some windows if that knuckler ain't its best.. | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Aug 07 1995 14:45 | 13 |
|
> BTW - his name is Albert, has been for a couple of years. We're sending
> him over to your house to explain it to you... :-)
Yeah, I know. "Keg party at my house after the game, Joey!"-- one of
the all-time great lines uttered by a classy *Cleveland* sports fan... ;-)
Actually, I've only reverted to calling him Joey after he inexplicably
started lobbing baseballs (with his arm, not his bat) over the Green
Monster during a game late last season. Most bizarre...
glenn
|
63.1180 | Sox win 1st of 2 game series | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | Oh flight attendent! | Wed Aug 09 1995 02:44 | 5 |
| Tribe sure does look unbeatable. Just ask Tim Wakefield and
the rest of the Red Sox. Boy do I feel like the groaner.
Lil Ed
|
63.1181 | Here's hopin they prove me wrong | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Wed Aug 09 1995 07:57 | 12 |
|
Don't be going and get to excited yet. Wakefield pitched a great game
but the Sox (- Tinsley and O'Leary) didn't hit very well. I'm will not
get down on them they played some pretty good D but Clark has an ERA in
the Kevin Gross range and to muster only three runs off him will not
win many games against the Indians. We got Hanson going tonight and I'm
not sure who goes for the Indians but I'll say this 5 runs will not be
enough to win if your a Sox fan.
Jerry
|
63.1182 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Aug 09 1995 09:11 | 4 |
63.1183 | | SALEM::DODA | No Alibis:Don'tGoThruLifeTryingToJustify | Wed Aug 09 1995 09:52 | 7 |
| Great game last night. I've been to about 20 games this year and
somehow kept missing Wakefield's turn. Couple things I've noticed
so far is that while the typical NY fan seems to have multiple
pierced body parts, the typical Cleveland fan loves those plastic
pocket protectors and doing the damn wave.
daryll
|
63.1184 | Rollward | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | the Halfway House Ruth Built... | Wed Aug 09 1995 09:55 | 3 |
|
Pocket Protectors. :-)
|
63.1185 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Aug 09 1995 13:10 | 3 |
63.1186 | Plastic Dolls >>>>pocket protectors | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Wed Aug 09 1995 13:45 | 5 |
|
C'mon Paul...they haven't had those out there in a few years. :*)
Jerry
|
63.1187 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Aug 09 1995 14:10 | 6 |
| Yeah, I agree with Jerry. Mine's long since worn out and I can't find a
replacement anywhere.
At least my inflatable alligator still works.
George
|
63.1188 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Wed Aug 09 1995 23:38 | 7 |
63.1189 | Sox sweep indians in mini-series | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | Oh flight attendent! | Thu Aug 10 1995 01:56 | 7 |
| Sox send tribe packing. groner, who cares about the season record.
All that matters is the stretch run and post season. cleveland,
W.S. chumps, er champs, anything less is a choke. Put your seatbelts
on ladies, it's going to be a fun ride! Just remember, this isn't
the movie major league, this is real life.
Lil Ed
|
63.1190 | Paul watch the game last night? | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Thu Aug 10 1995 08:23 | 8 |
|
re 63.1188
I got the web-foot frog.
|
63.1191 | Tribe goes ker-Plunk... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Aug 10 1995 10:13 | 9 |
|
I think some of these Indians' relievers like Assenmacher, Plunk, Mesa
must have sold their souls to the debil to be putting up the pitching
numbers they have so far. Hopefully they negotiated for a postseason
extension. Last night's Eric Plunk is the one I remember-- under
pressure, can't make a pitch to save his life...
glenn
|
63.1192 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Aug 10 1995 10:38 | 5 |
|
Nah, they're just tired (well, Plunk & Tavarez, at least). Mesa,
I might agree with you on...
Joe
|
63.1194 | tribe series loss equals another go yanks pname - yek! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant! | Thu Aug 10 1995 12:44 | 8 |
63.1195 | Just got my tickets! | SALEM::DODA | No Alibis:Don'tGoThruLifeTryingToJustify | Thu Aug 10 1995 13:44 | 3 |
| They're in Baltimore on Monday.
daryll
|
63.1196 | If'n you can call the inhabitants of the Bronx Zoo "people" | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Aug 10 1995 13:50 | 9 |
|
> I'm gonna jump on this bandwagon. There's only 3 good things about
> the Yanks - Scooter, Donnie and the park.
Make that one good thing-- and only if you ignore most of the people
that are in it...
glenn
|
63.1197 | Thanks, Injuns! | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Fri Aug 11 1995 07:26 | 4 |
| GO TRIBE! Stomp dem Yanks...You gotta like the double dunk of the
Yankees yesterday. Indians score 5 in the top of the ninth to win it.
Steve
|
63.1198 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant! | Fri Aug 11 1995 07:56 | 9 |
63.1199 | What led me to the teepee | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Fri Aug 11 1995 08:27 | 9 |
| It may sound wierd but I began to take a liking to the Indians once I
became manager of the Indians Little League team in my town. It wasn't
so painful this year wearing an Indians hat around town. If it means
anything, the Indians of the Assabet Valley Little League were champs!
I also helped coach my daughter's t-ball team, who were unfortunately
called the Yankees. I hope she isn't scarred for life because of it.
Steve
|
63.1200 | 8 back and fading fast | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Fri Aug 11 1995 09:19 | 9 |
|
Its always a good day/night when someone anyone beats the Yankmees.
When they get swept in a DH and the Sox win it is even better. Heres
hopin the Tribe keeps up the good work.
Jerry
|
63.1201 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant! | Fri Aug 11 1995 09:24 | 4 |
63.1202 | 10-6 would be a disappointment | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Fri Aug 11 1995 12:25 | 4 |
|
Wanna bet
|
63.1203 | ~/~ | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Aug 11 1995 12:30 | 4 |
| ... but the real question is, will the Browns ever be able to beat the
Steelers again?
George
|
63.1204 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant! | Fri Aug 11 1995 16:06 | 6 |
63.1205 | Game one win and the Pats are on their way | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Fri Aug 11 1995 16:49 | 9 |
|
See ya in a couple a weeks Paul.
Pats will cruise over the 'Spots
Jerry
|
63.1206 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant! | Sat Aug 12 1995 08:20 | 7 |
63.1207 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Yanks are ascared to play injuns in the playoffsex | Mon Aug 14 1995 10:12 | 3 |
|
I believe in the Indians.
|
63.1208 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Mon Aug 14 1995 10:18 | 7 |
| >>"Yanks are ascared to play injuns in the playoffsex"
Chappy,
What's "playoffsex"?
Roland
|
63.1209 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Yanks are ascared to play injuns in the playoffs | Mon Aug 14 1995 10:21 | 3 |
|
Woops that better????
|
63.1210 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Mon Aug 14 1995 10:41 | 3 |
|
I didn't want a correction, I wanted an entertaining explanation...
:-) :-) :-)
|
63.1211 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Mon Aug 14 1995 10:43 | 7 |
| Possible definitions of "playoffsex":
o First one to score wins?
o It's only good for one of the teams?
o When the series is over, everyone smokes a cigarette?
|
63.1212 | 'course '78 was the best that it could be | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Aug 14 1995 16:45 | 2 |
| I know that prior to division playoffsex the American could only manage
a single while the national went for 2 out of 3
|
63.1213 | wins another series... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Thu Aug 17 1995 15:22 | 30 |
|
The Indians take the last of a 3 game series in Baltimore....8-5.
Jose Mesa gets his 34th straight save.
Kenny Loften and Manny Ramerez are named the player of the game.
Kenny Loften scores 3 runs, get 3 RBI's and hits 2 triples...one
should have been a home run when it hit the hot dog in right field.
Manny Ramerez hits his 27th home run with two on to put the lid
on the game.
Great game to watch on ESPN....I love it when they get those
closeup shots with the sweat dripping off their faces.
One other thing to note...there must have 6 or 7 hits that went
right up to the fence...a couple of feet more and THEIR OUT OF HERE!
Big park in Baltimore...that right field corner is the death trap.
The Tribe comes home now to take on the Brewers....
Go CLEVELAND!
W A H O O ......... T H E C H I E F
|
63.1214 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Aug 17 1995 15:27 | 8 |
| > Jose Mesa gets his 34th straight save.
Are you guys hoping he blows a save BEFORE the playoffs ?
> Big park in Baltimore...that right field corner is the death trap.
You're kidding, right ? Even the Yanks hit a lot of HRs in Baltimore.
|
63.1215 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Aug 17 1995 15:42 | 6 |
| I understand Mesa is closing in on the record for consecutive saves for
either the major leagues or the American League, I forget which.
The Eck has the current record about 1 save ahead of Mesa.
George
|
63.1216 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Thu Aug 17 1995 17:38 | 4 |
63.1217 | First Puckett now Bonilla? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Aug 17 1995 17:47 | 2 |
| Regarding the hotdog in right field, they shouldn't put Bonilla out
there anyway
|
63.1218 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Aug 18 1995 09:37 | 12 |
|
> Sure, but people still don't believe Mesa is as solid as Aggie, but
> I won't mention your name Joe.
Eh. Right now, I'd still rather have Aggie. If Mesa keeps it up
all this year, and Aggie doesn't perform at least as well, then I'll
probably switch my preference to Mesa after his first few performances
next year. But you have to admit - there was a lot of evidence that
he _couldn't_ pitch effectively before he began demonstrating that
he _could_ be an effective reliever.
Joe
|
63.1219 | What's their problem with Milw ? | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:59 | 9 |
| > Sure, but people still don't believe Mesa is as solid as Aggie, but
> I won't mention your name Joe.
Gee Groaner, you're doing the Waugaman thing...putting words in my mouth.
I've never said anything about Mesa-Aguillera. All I'm saying is that
the chances of a pitcher converting every save opportunity through the
regular and postseason are probably very, very small. Therefore, if I
were a Cle fan, I'd want him to get a blown save out of the way before
the postseason.
|
63.1220 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:01 | 5 |
|
Joe, do you walk down the street constantly looking over your shoulder?
:-) :-) :-)
There are multiple Joes in this conference...
|
63.1221 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:03 | 19 |
|
Well, the Indians loose the first game to the Brewers.....poor
starting piching....Can't remember who started but the score was
something like 7-zip after 6.
Indians seem to be taking things pretty lightly and not giving it
their all since about two weeks after the all star break. I would
rather see them win every game. I hate waking up in the morning and
seeing they lost.
COME ON NOW.....LET GET IT TOGETHER. I DON'T WANT TO
SEE ANOTHER LOSS! and I certainly don't want to see
the Red Sox get close to winning more game than the Tribe.
I'm actually still waiting for the Sox to run into their big
loosing streak that they have the pattent on.
The Chief,
WaHooooo
|
63.1222 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:05 | 3 |
| Cruising the last half of the season is always a concern. Teams surging
at the end always seem to carry the W's into the playoffs. (see 1983
and Balt vs. Chi)
|
63.1223 | Trouble in Cleveland? | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | How can people live in Florida? | Mon Aug 21 1995 10:55 | 7 |
| Indians starting pitching is a real concern. Martinez hasn't won in a
month, Hill has been a disappointment, Nagy has had a couple of rough
starts in a row. They'd better start to straighten out soon. Going
into the playoffs playing .500 ball for the last two months of the
season would be a bad omen.
NAZZ
|
63.1224 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Aug 21 1995 11:09 | 6 |
|
Now that Mesa has the record with 37 straight saves. Its time for
him to blow one. Either that or wait until the Tribe face the Sox
in the playoffs.
Ron
|
63.1225 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 22 1995 07:58 | 5 |
63.1226 | Offense will only carry you so far | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Tue Aug 22 1995 08:10 | 6 |
|
Shouldn't that read "Just imagine if the starting staff turns in
around again."
|
63.1227 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Aug 22 1995 09:38 | 9 |
|
> Shouldn't that read "Just imagine if the starting staff turns in
> around again."
Well, it could be that, but Paul's statement makes more sense. There
is no particular reason to believe, based upon past history, pitch
counts this season, and so on that they _won't_.
Joe
|
63.1228 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Aug 22 1995 15:19 | 7 |
| *IF* pitching staffs start to slide LATE in the year, there usually isn't
a "turning around". It usually has to do with tired arms, injuries, etc.
Despite all the good hitting, there is reason to be concerned if their
pitching *IS* sliding. In the playoffs, good pitching beats good hitting...
especially in a best-of-5, where you'll likely see the other team's best
2 for four games.
|
63.1229 | Clemens beats angels, 6-4 final | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | Oh flight attendent! | Wed Aug 23 1995 04:29 | 21 |
| Re -1 > IF* pitching staffs start to slide LATE in the year, there
usually isn't
a "turning around". It usually has to do with tired arms, injuries,
etc.
I must agree totally with this one, the injuns are looking mighty
tired walking thru the west.
btw I watched Major League 2 again yesterday. Damn if the character
played by Randy Quaid isn't the Groaner! You know the guy, Tells
his buddies at beginning of spring training how the indians are going
all the way. At end of spring training when indians only went 3-27 how
they will come around. When they are stinkin' up the joint he's
all over the tribe screamin' at them how they all suck. At the end
when the make it to the World Series he tell's them, " I told you
at spring training they were going all the way!" But hey, maybe
it's just me who thinks this.
Lil Ed
|
63.1230 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Wed Aug 23 1995 08:20 | 10 |
63.1231 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Wed Aug 23 1995 09:10 | 12 |
| At least you could come up with some original material once in a while
Groaner! We've been hearing the same tired lines since April now, and
they weren't even funny then! We hear this shit all the time about the
Sox futility. Do you REALLY think YOUR comments bother us? All you're
doing is making an idiot of yourself.
Now to the topic at hand. Do you Indian fans have any concern at the
way the team is playing right now?
Steve
|
63.1232 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Wed Aug 23 1995 10:06 | 13 |
|
Speaking as a non-indian fan. The Tribe are do for a little let
down. They have something like a ~17 game lead, and are making the
playoffs. It don't matter how many games they win. They won't have
home field advantage for the 1st round of the playoffs. Besides it
seems every East Coast team. Either does rather well or pitiful on
the second West Coast swing.
The Sox did the same thing. Started out hot then cooled off. Now
they are hot again. I expect the Sox to cool off for a week or two.
Then start picking it up again. Every team will have hot and cold
spells. Its called who is going to be hot during the playoffs.
Ron
|
63.1233 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Aug 23 1995 10:35 | 7 |
|
> Now to the topic at hand. Do you Indian fans have any concern at the
> way the team is playing right now?
Not really, no.
Joe
|
63.1234 | The Cleveland slump | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Aug 23 1995 11:38 | 13 |
| What's the Indian's record during this "slump". > .500 I'm guessing.
It also seems like they're getting the clutch hitting they've always
got and good all around, solid effort play. None of the pitching in
general throughout both leagues seems to be doing the job, not unusual
for the dog days of summer.
But I for one never was completely convinced that Cleveland pitching
was overwhelming; I think it'll be satisfactory and the rest makes them
a tough opponent - I'd like to see a Redsox - Cleveland ACLS finale.
As a matter of courtesy it's okay for you to eliminate California while
we beat that tough Texas club, Joe.
|
63.1235 | now doesn't that sound familiar! | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Aug 23 1995 13:40 | 4 |
63.1236 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Wed Aug 23 1995 16:56 | 5 |
63.1237 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Wed Aug 23 1995 18:27 | 11 |
| > re: .1231
>
> Do you think your comments bother me? All you're doing is making an
> idiot of yourself.
That sounds like the pot calling the kettle black.....
;^)
|
63.1238 | Time warp | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Mon Aug 28 1995 11:33 | 26 |
| This is old news to you folks, but Jeff and I watched two games from July
between the Indians and the Angels recently. In the one, played in Cleveland,
the home team won in the 9th when Albert Belle hit a slam off of Lee Smith.
In the other, played in Anaheim, the home team won when Lee Smith shut down
the Indians in the 9th. Hershiser (returning to Southern California for
the first time) and Finley were the starters, neither had much, and both
teams went to their very deep bull pens to keep the game close.
What a marvelous matchup of two superb young teams. If you had told someone
two or three years ago that Cleveland and California were going to be the
two best teams in the AL, you'd have been locked up. But both franchises
have that excellent blend of young talent and veteran experience, both
have deep pitching staffs, both can score in bunches. The Indians have
more team speed, the Angels have better defense.
I find myself hoping (sorry, Red Sox fans) for a chance to watch a seven
game series between these two teams when I'm in LA in October. Who knows,
it might even be possible to get into the ballpark. Or have the folks in
Orange County finally figured out what's going on in the Big A, now that
the Rams are no longer soiling the grass?
If the absurd wildcard system results in Cleveland and California meeting
in the first round, it will be a travesty. Who should I be rooting for as
the wild card, to prevent it?
Steve
|
63.1239 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Aug 28 1995 11:48 | 10 |
|
> If the absurd wildcard system results in Cleveland and California meeting
> in the first round, it will be a travesty. Who should I be rooting for as
> the wild card, to prevent it?
Anyone _but_ Texas, Seattle, or Oakland.
What great choices - the Seligs or the Steinbreners...
Joe
|
63.1240 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Mon Aug 28 1995 12:00 | 5 |
|
California no longer has the 2nd best record in the A.L. The
travesty will be the Red Sox and Cleveland playing in the 1st round.
Ron
|
63.1241 | Time warp, as I said | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Mon Aug 28 1995 12:20 | 13 |
| Wow, Ron, that's news to me. I didn't realize the Red Sox had been that
hot (or has the loss of DiSarcina so weakened the Angels).
But in a sense that's also good news. As Joe indicated: I will NOT root
for Steinbrenner or Selig, even if the alternative is a World Series
between the Cardinals and the White Sox.
Strictly speaking, it's not a matter of best records to me, it's just
that Cal-Cle is such a delicious matchup. After watching two games of
it, I still hadn't figured out who I was rooting for; on a couple of
occasions, I shifted in midplay.
Steve
|
63.1242 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Mon Aug 28 1995 13:49 | 5 |
63.1243 | first time I heard it, I thought it was April 1st... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 09:53 | 14 |
| I keep hearing these rumors about the Tribe trying to pick up
Rickey Henderson. And my question is:
*** WHY? ***
Why deliberately bring a cancer into your clubhouse? Especially when it's
the Rickey of 1995, as opposed to the Rickey of 1990 or 1991. Gammons said
something about boosting the Indians hitting against righties(?), but added
that Rickey was only hitting .250 against them this year.
Leave him with Danny Tartabull where he belongs...
This would make *no* sense to me whatsoever - they've already got a carload of
cannons.
|
63.1244 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Tue Aug 29 1995 10:06 | 18 |
| > *** WHY? ***
>
>Why deliberately bring a cancer into your clubhouse? Especially when it's
>the Rickey of 1995, as opposed to the Rickey of 1990 or 1991. Gammons said
>something about boosting the Indians hitting against righties(?), but added
>that Rickey was only hitting .250 against them this year.
Kinda like the Yankee's getting Strawberry.
I hope the Indians DO get Rickey "I have the biggest ego in the world"
Henderson.....
'Saw
|
63.1245 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:23 | 7 |
|
I hope so too, _if_ he comes cheap.
I'd certainly trade a marginal prospect for Henderson, just to get
the draft picks...
Joe
|
63.1246 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:26 | 7 |
| > I'd certainly trade a marginal prospect for Henderson, just to get
> the draft picks...
Ahhh, the part I hadn't thought about. *That* makes sense.
I wouldn't let him in the clubhouse, though. I'd have him dress at home and
sit in the stands...
|
63.1247 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:00 | 7 |
63.1248 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:06 | 14 |
| > What good are stats when people routinely make them up on the fly?!
A wonderful question - I wouldn't know since I got the stat from watching
an ESPN program.
If you saw the original entry, I also wasn't sure about the lefthanded/
righthandedness of the stat (hence the ?).
If you're accusing *me* of making up the stat, I don't appreciate it. I make
it a point to put question marks when I'm not sure of something.
Even if Henderson is hitting over .300 on the side in question, I'm still not
sure I'd make such a trade - are the draft picks worth the pain in the butt of
having the guy?
|
63.1249 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Aug 29 1995 13:27 | 1 |
63.1250 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 14:14 | 4 |
|
> Unfortunately, you can't always trust stats from the media.
Get out of town! :-)
|
63.1251 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats rule Browns! | Thu Sep 07 1995 08:06 | 4 |
63.1252 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Thu Sep 07 1995 09:20 | 4 |
| > Have the Sox ever won 100 games in a season?
Three times.
|
63.1253 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Thu Sep 07 1995 09:22 | 8 |
| |> Have the Sox ever won 100 games in a season?
|
|Three times.
Let me CLARIFY that. Three times when they won the pennant. It's possible,
though improbable that they did it in a year when they didn't win the pennant.
|
63.1254 | | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Thu Sep 07 1995 10:18 | 3 |
| Was it 99 in 1978 or 100?
|
63.1255 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Thu Sep 07 1995 10:25 | 13 |
| > Was it 99 in 1978 or 100?
I couldn't tell you right now. If I remember tonight, I can find out.
I THINK it was 99, because the Yanks were 100/63, and they beat the Sox by
a game. That would lead me to believe that the Sox were 99/63, missing the
Century by one game.
'Saw
|
63.1256 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats trounce Browns in high school stadium | Thu Sep 07 1995 10:36 | 6 |
63.1257 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Thu Sep 07 1995 10:39 | 11 |
| >
> It was 99. I do not think the Sox have ever won 100 games in a regular
> season, and if they did, it was so long ago it don't count... heck,
> i'm told the 1964 Browns championship is too long ago, so you can't
> count anything in like 1918, when no one even owned a car.
>
Careful Paul, if you spin much more you'll drill yourself right into the
ground.
|
63.1258 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Thu Sep 07 1995 10:43 | 6 |
| Checking the stats, it was 1912, 1915, and 1946.
Those were all regular seasons. The 1918 season was shortened, but I can't
remember why, perhaps because of the war.
You did say "ever"....
|
63.1259 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Gehring <===> Ripken | Thu Sep 07 1995 10:52 | 5 |
|
If I'm not mistaken. There was a season in which the Yankees won
like 108 games. While the Sox won like a 102 and finished 6 back.
Ron
|
63.1260 | | WMGEN1::abs006p6.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:20 | 4 |
|
The there was the season in which the Indians won more games than any team
has ever one in the regular season. How's they do the in that World Series,
Paul?
|
63.1261 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:32 | 2 |
| I was actually surprised to see in today's USA Today that the Indians
hadn't clinched yet...
|
63.1262 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:34 | 13 |
|
This may be "unofficial", but I remember reading once that the all-time
record for one particular team finishing ahead of another particular
team in the standings is the Boston Red Sox over the Cleveland Indians,
25 straight seasons, 1967-1991. What we're being treated to here are
the lingering aftereffects of 25 years of pent-up frustration.
Now that the worm has turned, however briefly in relative terms,
the pressure is definitely on the Indians to make something of their
"success"...
glenn
|
63.1263 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats trounce Browns in high school stadium | Thu Sep 07 1995 13:56 | 14 |
63.1264 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Sep 07 1995 14:10 | 28 |
| RE<<< Note 63.1263 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Pats trounce Browns in high school stadium" >>>
> What constitutes recent past? 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, certainly
> not 77 years.
Well it depends. My U.S. history teacher seemed to think that 200 years
was too recent and most important U.S. history happened between 1622 and
1700.
Then again in England "the Bard" is considered modern and Jeffery Chaucer
is fairly recent. I asked a monk in West Minster Abby where Chaucer was buried
and he said "Oh we buried Jeffery over where that pole stands just before
we put on the new wing". The new wing is at least 500 years old.
Of course the Roman occupation of England was recent compared to the time
the Celts build Stone Henge but then some people say the ice age is fairly
recent when you consider how long the Dinosaurs have been dead.
In fact all multi-cell life forms are fairly recent compared to the billion
or so years that the one celled ameba ruled the earth. And as for our solar
system? Why the sun is a 2nd generation star, there was probably a giant
blue star here before the sun that went super-nova 7-8 billion years ago.
So no, 1918 isn't that far back. Like last year, it's history but recent
history. If the Indians want bragging rights, they've got to win the playoffs
like anyone else or people will be asking "what have you done for us lately"?
George
|
63.1265 | and do it in this note ok? | SALEM::DODA | Ask me about my vow of silence | Thu Sep 07 1995 14:40 | 5 |
| Please George, tell us more....
Don't hold back. More, more, more.....
daryll
|
63.1266 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats trounce Browns in high school stadium | Sun Sep 10 1995 11:02 | 15 |
63.1267 | YEP | FABSIX::K_JOHNSON | | Mon Sep 11 1995 01:38 | 8 |
| Hey Groaner!!!
Alright I have to say I agree with you on the matchups.
Sheeeeesh!!! I agreed with you on something,I think i'm
breaking out in a rash.
Alrighty Groaner,if the Indians were to make it to the
WS,Do you think they could beat Atlanta,or Cinn?I know
the sox could.
|
63.1268 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox swept by Yankees again! | Mon Sep 11 1995 07:57 | 9 |
63.1269 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 11 1995 09:03 | 5 |
| The last year the A's won the Pennant they got Swept by the Sox at Fenway
about a month before the Season ended. Big deal. As for Roger, he didn't pitch
in this series.
George
|
63.1270 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats trounce Browns in high school stadium | Mon Sep 11 1995 10:01 | 2 |
63.1271 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 11 1995 10:11 | 3 |
| You brought up Clemens, I didn't bring up McDowell.
George
|
63.1272 | GOT MINE... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:29 | 15 |
|
Well, I have my playoff tickets...4ea. My Mom and brother was on
the phone last Sat hitting redial for 1.75 hrs and finally got threw.
My tickets are for the 1st game on Oct 3.
They said that because of the trouble with the phone company, they
will not sell the remaining playoff tickets over the phone but now on
a lottery. So, I sent 25 bucks home so that my mom can buy $25.00
worth of stamps and put my name in, what...83 times. The lottery
closes next Tuesday.
The Chief,
WAHOOOOOOOO!
|
63.1273 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Sep 22 1995 13:11 | 4 |
| > My Mom and brother was on
> the phone last Sat hitting redial for 1.75 hrs and finally got threw.
They must be pretty light...
|
63.1274 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Sep 29 1995 17:45 | 7 |
|
Bean Ball game last night......
How dare they try and hit this years MVP....ALBERT BELLE.
WAHOO!
|
63.1275 | the tribe is not stopping until after they win the WS! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Sun Oct 01 1995 21:35 | 7 |
63.1276 | Sox win series 3-1 | FABSIX::K_JOHNSON | | Mon Oct 02 1995 04:18 | 11 |
|
I think Belle Should win it,but he won't.they will judge
the vote on who is means more to there teams sucsess.Without Belle
the Indians win by 20 games instead of 30.without Mo the sox are
not even .500.On top of it all Belle is the biggest sh*thead.It's
like a beauty contest and Belle ain't no Mr.Congenality.His personality
or lack their of,is gonna cost him an MVP award that he deserves.
Then ole Albert and the rest of the Tribe can cry all the way to
the golf course,beacause they will have plenty of time to think
about how they choked in a measly 5 game set to the sox.
|
63.1277 | Belle had a monster year best since 78 and Rice | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Mon Oct 02 1995 09:10 | 10 |
|
Belle is lock for MVP. Be serious 50 dingers in 144 games. The man
was on fire in Sept. Ties Ruths record of 17 HR's in the month. Belle
has grown up since his Joey days and that will not have any effect in
the balloting. Johnson is a lock for the Cy with Wakefield as comeback
player.
Jerry
|
63.1278 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 02 1995 09:22 | 7 |
| Why should personality have anything to do with the vote? This is an MVP
award, not Miss Congeniality.
I agree it could have an effect but that would only emphasize how nuts it
is to take seriously any vote by members of the sports press.
George
|
63.1279 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Red Sox - 1995 AL East Champs | Mon Oct 02 1995 10:22 | 11 |
|
There is only 1 possible reason why Albert Belle. Won't win the
MVP award. Its if the writers look at this last month. As if Belle
was padding his stats and swinging for the fences. Sort of like
Cleveland already has clinched the division. What else is there to play
for? I don't think they will and Belle will win.
Also want to say Congrats to the Indians and there fans. To win
100 games in a shortened 144 game season. It speaks for itself. What
a great season.
Ron
|
63.1280 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Mon Oct 02 1995 17:06 | 17 |
63.1281 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 02 1995 17:12 | 11 |
| So he does win Miss Congeniality, give him some flowers.
I still don't understand why any of this should have an impact on the MVP.
Seems the most valuable player is the most valuable player regardless if he's
Joe Jerk or Charity Charlie.
Of course we all know that considering who's doing the voting, it's the guy
who gives the best interviews that will win hands down. On that score Mike
Greenwell is probably a top contender.
George
|
63.1282 | sox win series 3-1 | FABSIX::K_JOHNSON | | Mon Oct 02 1995 21:58 | 10 |
|
Hey Groaner,don't get your dress in a knot.I stated that
Belle should win the MVP,but the way these sportswriters are
he probaly won't.NOBODY has had a year like Belle,padding his
stats or not it really don't matter.I like to watch him play
and my hats off to him and the rest of the Indians on an
outstanding year.(to bad its gonna end so soon)
|
63.1283 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Mon Oct 02 1995 22:44 | 5 |
63.1284 | sox win series 3-1 | FABSIX::K_JOHNSON | | Tue Oct 03 1995 03:28 | 7 |
|
I don't really think you can say pad his stats.You
just can't think that he is going to roll over and play dead
because his team is 30 games up in the division.I think it probably
a little easier to relax at the plate and swing away knowing that
fact.I'll give em credit he had a helluva year.
|
63.1285 | Simple math | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Tue Oct 03 1995 10:31 | 3 |
| As much as I like Mo, I gotta admit 50 doubles + 50 homers = MVP.
NAZZ
|
63.1286 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Oct 03 1995 11:06 | 23 |
|
> I think Belle Should win it,but he won't.they will judge
> the vote on who is means more to there teams sucsess.Without Belle
> the Indians win by 20 games instead of 30.without Mo the sox are
> not even .500.On top of it all Belle is the biggest sh*thead.It's
> like a beauty contest and Belle ain't no Mr.Congenality.His personality
> or lack their of,is gonna cost him an MVP award that he deserves.
> Then ole Albert and the rest of the Tribe can cry all the way to
> the golf course,beacause they will have plenty of time to think
> about how they choked in a measly 5 game set to the sox.
Say we have two people, one a millionare and one a beggar.
The millionare finds a dirty, rumpled $100 bill in the street.
The beggar finds a crisp, new $5 bill in the street.
The fiver is clearly of more importance to the beggar than the $100
bill is to the millionare.
But is $5 more valuable than $100?
Joe
|
63.1287 | The Busting has begun... | SNAX::ERICKSON | Red Sox - 1995 AL East Champs | Tue Oct 03 1995 11:12 | 9 |
|
A game hasn't been played. Yet, the mud slinging has already
started. He who left me a note in my office this morning. Knows
what I'm talking about. Have to admit I got a good laugh this
morning, out of it. :^)
Ron
P.S. Karen wants a Indian napkin too.
|
63.1288 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Tue Oct 03 1995 11:15 | 8 |
63.1289 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Red Sox - 1995 AL East Champs | Tue Oct 03 1995 12:00 | 5 |
|
I'm game for P-name wagering. Sox win I pick a P-name for you.
Tribe wins you pick a P-name for me. P-name to last for 1 week.
Ron
|
63.1291 | ...this is not an admission that I sent the stuff... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Wed Oct 04 1995 15:06 | 5 |
63.1292 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Oct 04 1995 15:08 | 4 |
| It's un-American NOT to draw a moustache on any Indians logo you see!
8^)
|
63.1293 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Oct 04 1995 16:22 | 1 |
63.1294 | Go Braves :*) | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Wed Oct 04 1995 17:15 | 6 |
|
Great Logo Karen. Where can I get one?
Jerry
|
63.1295 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Red Sox - 1995 AL East Champs | Wed Oct 04 1995 17:34 | 6 |
|
Has everyone in HLO. Seen what Karen did to Chief Wahoo? I'm
waiting for just the right moment. To release my version of Chief
Wahoo. :^)
Ron
|
63.1296 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Red Sox - 1995 AL East Champs | Wed Oct 04 1995 17:36 | 4 |
|
I see that all the Cleveland fans ignored .1289. :^)
Ron
|
63.1298 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Thu Oct 05 1995 09:05 | 3 |
63.1299 | SWEEP????? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Oct 06 1995 12:02 | 22 |
|
Believeland.......you just got to!
What a game Tuesday! I never had so much fun! What a great place!
If I had gone to any other game there would be no way it could have
beaten this one. This game was like the whole season rapped up in
one.
Who would have believed I had gotten tickets to that game. So, I
turn around and drive back the same morning...3.5 hrs later. I get
home and Mom is on the phone....she asks me if I feel like driving
back.....WHAT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN...I say....Yep believe it or not,
she got 4 tickets to the ALCS. She was picked in the lottery.
I'll see if Dec will give me the time off....
WAHOOOOOOO!
|
63.1300 | Here's your cork baby! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Oct 06 1995 18:19 | 13 |
|
One issue I haven't seen raised yet is the Jerk Kennedy's yanking
of Albert's Bat. Cleveland people are so upset that they expect an
appology from him. You should have heard the radio stations talk.
What was once just a game between the two clubs has now turned into
a hate type of thing. They just can't believe Kennedy would do such
a thing. To me, it just seems like they have stooped very low and it
just doesn't make Boston look good. How could you do that to the MVP?
If someone thought Belle had a corked bat, don't you think it would
have been checked long ago? It just makes you look bad.
Wahoo!
|
63.1301 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Fri Oct 06 1995 18:27 | 5 |
|
Question for you Hal. Has Belle ever been busted for using
a corked bat before?
Claybone
|
63.1302 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 06 1995 18:31 | 13 |
| During the game they were talking about "the incident last year". I seem
to remember some story from last year about the umpire confiscating his bat,
some bat boy climbing over a partition and lifting it from the umpire's room,
and a big controversy that followed.
Were those two incidents the same? If so, what was the outcome, was the bat
corked?
If he's been caught before then it would seem that they were justified. If
he's never been caught before and if no former Cleveland player now on another
team offered "probable cause", then it would seem to be a cheap shot.
George
|
63.1303 | ROCK THE HOUSE! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Oct 06 1995 20:13 | 21 |
|
Yes, it was the same incident. But, if you remember, Albert said that
it was someone elses bat he had picked up....not his. That was last
year....not this year. And to beat all, his bat was sawed off and not
usable. Here you take the hottest hitter in the league and you take
his bat and cut it up. What kind of crap is that. It just makes
Boston look bad.
Clevelanders are really pumping up the rivalry thing between Hargrove
and Kennedy which goes all the way back to when the two managed some
AAA club in a playoff game years ago.
Like they say in Cleveland, don't piss Albert off. This incident will
put Albert to another level. Weather you know it or not, Albert gets
HOT when he is pissed. A statement in the T&G this morning states that
Albert said he gets more harrassment from Boston fans than any other.
He said he is looking forward to it. PUMP IT UP ALBERT!
The Chief,
Wahooo!
|
63.1304 | WELCOME TO THE SHOW! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Oct 06 1995 20:21 | 28 |
|
While in Cleveland for the game, I picked up the WAHOO video.
Great thing it is. 12 of the best last at bat games at the JAKE.
Boston game at the Jake is #9. #2 is the game Ek goes WOW when
Manny hits the big one. Game #1 is the very next night when Albert
hits his grandslam to win the game in the last inning. GREAT VIDEO!
Another of my favorates is the game Cleveland is 8 runs behind after
two innings and wins in their last at bat. Video has many interviews
and tells why the team slaps the HR man that hits the game winner.
Another thing about going to the game...the 1st anouncement goes...
begin a low buzzing sound.........
LADIES AND GENTELMEN, NOW FOR THE MAIN EVENT.....I can't remember
it all but the buzzing sound gets louder and louder until they anounce
YOUR CLEVELAND INDIANS....this is the beginning of the end for the Red
Sox!
The Chief,
Wahoo!
|
63.1305 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Oct 06 1995 20:39 | 1 |
63.1306 | Juuust abit outside.... | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Fri Oct 06 1995 20:45 | 5 |
|
I'm glad Clevland put out a "Best of" tape.....a person can only watch
"Major League I & II" so many times........ :-)))
john
|
63.1307 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Sat Oct 07 1995 08:26 | 39 |
| > One issue I haven't seen raised yet is the Jerk Kennedy's yanking
> of Albert's Bat. Cleveland people are so upset that they expect an
> appology from him.
They've got a long wait. And I would hope that "Cleveland people" in general
would have better things to worry about.
> You should have heard the radio stations talk.
> What was once just a game between the two clubs has now turned into
> a hate type of thing.
It seems to be just one-way, then.
> They just can't believe Kennedy would do such
a thing. To me, it just seems like they have stooped very low and it
just doesn't make Boston look good.
>How could you do that to the MVP?
Last time I checked, Albert had never won the MVP award, and this year's hasn't
been announced yet.
> If someone thought Belle had a corked bat, don't you think it would
> have been checked long ago?
It was, a year or so ago. And he was bagged.
>It just makes you look bad.
I could say that about most of your notes... :-)
>But, if you remember, Albert said that
>it was someone elses bat he had picked up....not his.
"If it does not fit, you must acquit!"
OK, Hal. You're a cop. You see a guy weaving in the road. You check and find
out that the guy has a past DWI conviction. You mean to tell me you're not a
little more likely to check and see if he's drunk?
|
63.1308 | The Show continues..... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Sat Oct 07 1995 09:29 | 14 |
|
Turn out the lights.......give me a broom......we'll see ya in
Cincinatti......
The Tribe takes care of Boston on a huge mid inning blast with
5 big runs.
mOfer and jOfer go 0 fer 27 in the series.
Bring on the Yanks!
WAHOOOOO!O!!O!O!O!O!
|
63.1309 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Year 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996 | Sun Oct 08 1995 14:25 | 5 |
63.1310 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Oct 09 1995 10:25 | 15 |
| I don't know what the big deal about the bat is. To me it's not all that much
different than a hockey manager questioning someone's stick, or the goalies
pads.
I guess in professional sports you try to get the edge anyway you can.
Yesterday they were talking about Rodney Hampton's busted hand during the
Giants game saying how it was a target for the Arizona defense. If you know
it's hurt you go after it.
It's not all that different than the pine tar incident.....
If Albert has a problem because his bat got sawed open, and it'll affect his
hitting, you'd have to put for the premise that the power is in the bat and
not in Albert. Personally, I just don't think that's the case.
|
63.1311 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 09 1995 10:34 | 10 |
| Moreover, the Sox can't be blamed because the bat was sawed open
rather than X-rayed; that was the A.L. office that was responsible.
Moreover, Belle deserves the reputation - he was caught once, no
matter what the excuse he gave was.
Cleveland was just a much better team, and will be for the next
couple of years. Still, anything can happen.
Looks to me like an Atlanta-Cleveland world series. I'd pick the
Braves at this point.
|
63.1312 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Red Sox - 1995 AL East Champs | Mon Oct 09 1995 10:35 | 19 |
|
Albert Belle might say he picked the wrong bat. Which is crap IMO.
He used a corked bat last year. Remember someone broke into the
umpires rooms and swapped bats. They used video replay of the previous
2 games, plus the video from the bat being confiscated. To determine
which was the correct bat. So Albert was using the wrong bat for 3
games? Anyways that was last year, who cares.
The Red Sox scouts felt that a couple of Belle's homers in
September were suspect. Bad swings/contact and the ball still went
out of the park. I'm sure they had more information. What a better
time to find out?
Also the Red Sox DID NOT saw the bat in half. It was ? Brown
who was acting as the AL commissioner. Since he is/was a doctor.
He felt is would be a waste of hospital resources to x-ray the bat.
So he cut it in half. He later appolgized saying that if he knew. It
was the bat Albert used to hit #50. He would not have cut the bat
in half. So who in Cleveland didn't tell him?
Ron
|
63.1313 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Year 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996 | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:09 | 43 |
63.1314 | Bush-league maneuver... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:11 | 13 |
|
> They just can't believe Kennedy would do such
> a thing. To me, it just seems like they have stooped very low and it
> just doesn't make Boston look good. How could you do that to the MVP?
> If someone thought Belle had a corked bat, don't you think it would
> have been checked long ago? It just makes you look bad.
Damndest thing; Hal's making a lot of sense here...
glenn
|
63.1315 | Gammons can and will be full of it, just like Indians' batboy | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:15 | 12 |
|
> Read the Globe and Peter Gammons. According to Cleveland sources,
> they have a signed Jim Rice bat given to an Indians bat boy - ITS
> CORKED!
According to Peter Gammons, Bucky Dent's HR in 1978 was hit with
Mickey Rivers' corked bat... by extension, maybe the entire 1978
playoff was played with corked bats. I think the game should be
pulled, sawed open and re-played.
glenn
|
63.1316 | GO M's! | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 09 1995 16:16 | 1 |
63.1317 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 09 1995 16:22 | 12 |
|
> Anyone hear the radio call for last night's M's gamewinner? Unbelievable!
Yes, this morning. I think that was Dave Niehaus from Seattle...
Contrast that with Brent Mooseburger, whose obnoxious HR call (put
it on the scoreboard! waitaminute folks, old Brent made a mistake,
that was only a double) is starting to make Hawk Harrelson's sound
good...
glenn
|
63.1318 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Cleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd... | Mon Oct 09 1995 16:33 | 9 |
| > Contrast that with Brent Mooseburger, whose obnoxious HR call (put
> it on the scoreboard! waitaminute folks, old Brent made a mistake,
> that was only a double) is starting to make Hawk Harrelson's sound
> good...
When he was no longer with CBS and was doing the World Lumberjack Finals
or some such nonsense, I was *so* happy. Then he started doing more work
on ESPN, more on ABC. And the idiot is back. I hate him more than just
about anything sports-related...
|
63.1319 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 09 1995 17:07 | 2 |
63.1320 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 10 1995 09:24 | 14 |
63.1321 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Cleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd... | Tue Oct 10 1995 09:33 | 15 |
|
If Seattle can get to game 6, this could get *very* interesting.
The Big Unit is really something to watch, now that he's learned to pitch
as opposed to just throwing.
Prediction:
Game 1: CLE
Game 2: CLE
Game 3: SEA
Game 4: SEA (if Hill goes instead of Martinez)
Game 5: CLE
Game 6: SEA
Game 7: CLE
|
63.1322 | Is it one of those "hurt his feelings things"? | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Tue Oct 10 1995 09:40 | 5 |
| With the way Hershiser has been pitching, why wouldn't Hargrove swap he
and Martinez? Hershiser seems to have been the more effective pitcher
over the past month or so.
Steve
|
63.1323 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 10 1995 09:50 | 12 |
| If they use a 4 man rotation it doesn't matter, they each pitch once in the
1st 4 games and only the 4th guy doesn't get an "if needed" start.
And while other teams seem to be shifting to 3 starters, it's not clear the
Indians will go that way.
Speaking of which, it's funny that in the 1st year of extended playoffs so
many teams are going to a 3 man rotation. You'd think with the extra games it
would be more difficult for a pitcher to keep coming back one day short on
rest. A 3 man rotation makes more sense with a short playoff schedule.
George
|
63.1324 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Parcells must go... | Tue Oct 10 1995 10:09 | 12 |
|
Remember Seattle is the home team, Don't ask why. I look for
a split in Seattle the first two games. Seattle winning two out
of three in Cleveland. Then Randy Johnson closing out Cleveland
@Seattle in game 6.
During the regular season Ken Griffey. Was only available for
1 of the 9 games played. In which Cleveland won five. Everybody on
both sides. Did not play well against the other. Except for Jay Bunher
who had 5 Hrs and 16(?) rbi's against Cleveland. Cleveland doesn't
have a lefty starter. That can give Griffey trouble.
Ron
|
63.1325 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 10 1995 10:13 | 13 |
63.1326 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Cleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd... | Tue Oct 10 1995 10:23 | 3 |
| > You can wish all you want, Cleveland will not lose this series.
Paul, can we count on you visiting Crow Cafe if they do?
|
63.1327 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 10 1995 10:27 | 4 |
63.1328 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Cleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd... | Tue Oct 10 1995 11:52 | 5 |
| > Reality is they will not lose, so I guess I don't have to worry about
> it.
You don't have to worry about it - all you have to do is answer a direct
question.
|
63.1329 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Oct 10 1995 14:38 | 12 |
| re: .1325
Offense - even
Starting pitching - advantage Cleveland
Relief pitching - advantage Cleveland
Defense - even
Home Field - Seattle
= Cleveland in 5 or 7 (Cleveland won't win game 6 in Seattle vs Johnson
if it goes that far, Hershiser or no)
|
63.1330 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 10 1995 16:42 | 3 |
63.1331 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Oct 10 1995 17:32 | 9 |
|
Adjusted to a neutral park, Cleveland scored the equivalent of 862
runs, Seattle 792.
Cleveland allowed 622 runs, Seattle 705.
FWIW,
Joe
|
63.1332 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Parcells must go... | Tue Oct 10 1995 18:24 | 9 |
|
As always numbers can be mis-leading. Ken Griffey missed 6 weeks
of the season. Would the Mariners have scored more? Would the Mariners
given up fewer runs?
I'm not saying that Griffey would produce .48 runs a game more. To
entirely make up the difference. He would have produced more, then
whoever the M's had in center field.
Ron
|
63.1333 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Oct 10 1995 18:30 | 8 |
|
I'd agree; he most likely would. I doubt he would have _saved_ any runs
defensively (and would be surprised if he wouldn't have _cost_ runs;
for all Griffey _looks_ good defensively, he covers far less ground
than most any other CF around these days). Overall, I'm certain
the effect would be positive.
Joe
|
63.1334 | Refreshing to see a couple superstars rise to the occasion... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Still just a rat in a cage | Tue Oct 10 1995 18:55 | 8 |
|
Interesting how bigtime clutch Junior and Edgar Martinez were in that
Yankee series, as neither had ever played an "important" game in
their relatively long careers before the stretch run this season.
Contrast Junior/Edgar with Mo/Jose, for example...
glenn
|
63.1335 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 11 1995 00:19 | 4 |
63.1336 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 09:15 | 10 |
| > Seattle wins game 1, 3-2. Indians chance of winning the series drops
> from 98% to 95%.
Sorry, I think it drops their chances to about 50%. Randy Johnson is
probably a very good bet to win both his games, which would leave
Cleveland needing a sweep of the other 4, 2 of which are at Cleveland,
and 2 at Seattle. Nice try at false bravado, however. Cleveland in as
close to a must-win situation tonight as you can get without facing
elimination.
|
63.1337 | | SALEM::DODA | Ask me about my vow of silence | Wed Oct 11 1995 11:04 | 4 |
| The notion that Lou Pinella is the best manager in baseball gains
momentum.
daryll
|
63.1338 | not sayin it won't happen | AD::HEATH | Tribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sports | Wed Oct 11 1995 12:50 | 9 |
|
I wouldn't count on two wins from the Big Unit just yet. Yea he has
been impressive down the stretch, playoff game against Cal and the
Stankees but this be the Indians. The are two tiers above either one
of those aforementioned clubs toss in the Sox too. You can count on
a split for sure but not a sweep for Johnson.
Jerry
|
63.1339 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 13:44 | 13 |
| > I wouldn't count on two wins from the Big Unit just yet. Yea he has
> been impressive down the stretch, playoff game against Cal and the
> Stankees but this be the Indians. The are two tiers above either one
> of those aforementioned clubs toss in the Sox too. You can count on
> a split for sure but not a sweep for Johnson.
>
> Jerry
Yeah, we could se how well they did against the Seattle ace, Bob Wolcott.
No doubt Cleveland will just score in bunches against Randy Johnson.
It's true that Johnson might not win one, but I sure wouldn't
want to be down 0-2 and NEED a victory against him, either, would you ?
|
63.1340 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Oct 11 1995 14:23 | 5 |
63.1341 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 15:24 | 10 |
| > Big Unit should take care of Cleveland. the Indians aren't a very good
> hitting team against lefties, never mind the best lefty in the game.
> They were only 8 games above .500 against lefties this year.
8-0 against lefties would be a pretty good record. What was the winning
percentage (forget the 8 games over .500 bit).
Still, I agree Johnson should be able to handle Cleveland, unless the
Indians can get a 1-0, 2-1, or 3-2 type game out of Nagy. I don't think
they will.
|
63.1343 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:25 | 7 |
| > In typical Groiner fashion, he logs in at 23:19 last night
> with the game results and then doesn't show his face here all
> day.
Yes, but no doubt he will do the exact same thing should Cleveland win
a game in this series.
|
63.1344 | I don't even like the Indians but they will win this series | AD::HEATH | Tribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sports | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:29 | 10 |
|
<<< Note 63.1339 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
Yup one game makes the Indians a bad team. You bet. Wolcott stepped
in Leprauchan sh*t on the way to the dome. The Indians swung at some
bad pitches and it cost them. i will bet you a pname they score more
than 2 runs off of Big Unit. And it will be enough to win.
Jerry
|
63.1345 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:30 | 8 |
| > Offense EVEN? Please explain how you came up with this? Batting
> Average? Runs per game? How?
By comparing the batting orders. Cleveland has an advantage at the top
of the order (setting the table), and at the very bottom of the order,
where Seattle is relatively weak. However, the power spots in the order
(positions 3 through 7) give an edge to Seattle, even with Belle having
such a great year.
|
63.1346 | sox done - 'nuff said - tribe will win - bank on it | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:38 | 7 |
63.1347 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:40 | 25 |
| > i will bet you a pname they score more
> than 2 runs off of Big Unit. And it will be enough to win.
>
> Jerry
Nah, I don't note enough in most weeks to make this any sort of a bet,
and I'm really not against either Seattle or Cleveland. On the other hand,
Cleveland isn't really that much better than Seattle anywhere except in
their starting pitching, and in that regard Seattle's win last night was
a VERY big victory.
Still, I don't think Cleveland will beat Johnson. The M's may lose a game
he starts by yielding runs late, but I'll show up in the crow note if the
Indians belt him around. At one point when Johnson was something like
13-1, the Mariners had won all seven of the other games he had started and
not finished (might have been six, but I think seven). He wins ball games
and keeps them in the others as well. I don't think Nagy can beat
Johnson in game 3, and if Cleveland is down, they probably won't sned Hill
in game 4, so it would be Nagy and Johnson again in game 6, this time in
Seattle.
Because of their pitching, Cleveland is overall a better team; BUT, this
series looks to go 7 games at this point, and anything can happen in a
winner-take-all game.
|
63.1348 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:41 | 5 |
|
Groan, Give these Sox fans a break. Can't you see they aint got
a clue!!
|
63.1349 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:51 | 15 |
| > Jerry, what do you expect from MIMS::ROLLINS_R. In RED_SOX he's trying
> to say that the HR that Belle hit was meaningless. I thought the Sox
> fans were supposed to be knowledgeable - but this guy calls a game
> tying HR meaningless. I guess he was looking for a Mo-FER type plate
> appearance.
In actuality, it was meaningless, because Cleveland lost, while a hit in
the clutch would have given them a win. Belle didn't come through when he
could have won the game for them, and he didn't. He didn't produce, he
didn't do his job, he failed, and it cost Cleveland game 1.
Other than inflate his stats, that home run did Cleveland absolutely no
good. None. Nada. Zilch. And I'm sure if he were asked, Belle would
admit he would have traded in that HR for a single in the earlier
situation.
|
63.1350 | Asleep at the wheel... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Still just a rat in a cage | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:54 | 9 |
|
> Groan, Give these Sox fans a break. Can't you see they aint got
> a clue!!
Just like Buck Showalter...
glenn
|
63.1351 | Seattle in 4 | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:55 | 6 |
| How come Chappy and Groaner never face the fact that there teams lose??
They both go by the same motto....."When in doubt insult the Red Sox"
Can't you both admit you like the Sox?? You both seem to know more
about them that the rest of us :-))
john
|
63.1352 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:57 | 3 |
|
KK couldn't sniff Buck's Jock.
|
63.1353 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Wed Oct 11 1995 16:59 | 4 |
|
All I know about the sox is that they are the classic example
of FUTILITY year in and year out!
|
63.1354 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:03 | 5 |
63.1355 | Just awesome!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:04 | 4 |
|
Not too mention there MVP candidate goin Mo fer 14 in the biggest
games of his life.
|
63.1356 | nag,nag,nag | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:11 | 7 |
|
Don't use that word choke to much...the Yankee's already did it and
last time I looked Clevland was not winning there series. I am glad the
Yankees spent all there money to get Wetteland,Mcdowell,Fernandez and
rent the services of Cone.....They Really came throught in the clutch!
john
|
63.1357 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:13 | 6 |
63.1358 | Sorry, couldn't resist | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:22 | 6 |
| >> Probably the only thing that Boston has > Cleveland is
>> auto thefts and % of dunces in population.
Of course, you moving from Cleveland to Boston didn't help
us at all on that second thing.
|
63.1359 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:23 | 21 |
| > Last I checked, Cleveland sent the Sox packing in three making them
> look like a AAA team.
Absolutely right. Cleveland is far superior in 1995, and those fans
who are over 50 years old may remember Cleveland's most recent W.S.title,
while you'd have to be as old as some of our distinguished noters in here
to remeber a Sox W.S. title.
> Of course, the Browns sent the Pats packing last year as well.
Possibly Cleveland is better than the Pats this year as well, but the Pats
sent the Browns packing, and the Browns wins over relatively pathetic teams
like Houston won't be too impressive when playoff time comes (if they
should make the playoffs). Someone has to make the playoffs from the
only division that doesn't have a team with a winning record.
> Cleveland Orchestra > Boston Pops. Jacobs Field > Fenway.
Groaner, you ought to stop your notes earlier, while you can still focus
enough to distinguish fact from fantasy.
|
63.1360 | seattle in 4 | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:27 | 8 |
|
That's it now you've really p!ssed me off! NOBODY...I mean NOBODY
insults the Boston Pops!!! I hope your cable goes out @7:55 tonight!
BTW: Our % of dunces in population just went up....another boat load of
cleveland refuges just arrived.
john
|
63.1361 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:31 | 22 |
| > Chappy, you've got to admit the Sox were awesome this year, with
> choking in the playoffs and flying that 1918 banner in Fenway.
> A team to be feared! A perfect example of how *NOT* to win
> championships.
In this regard, the Sox were not awesome, they were overachievers,
without a heck of a lot of talent. They had a great season, considering
the talent level on the team. Meanwhile, the Yanks seriously underachieved
while Cleveland will also have to be considered underachievers if they
fail to win the Series. 1954 may not be the only time a supposedly
great Cleveland team came up short in a big way.
Given the paucity of talent on the Sox team last year, I think they came
as close as they could to winning a title in 1995. However, I will give
a big advantage to Cleveland in an example of how to win championships:
not in what they've done on the field, but in the front office.
The Indians' brass made the decision a couple of years ago to ink their
fledgling stars (guys like Baerga) to longer-term contracts, and it's
surely going to pay off for them. The Braves' did the same with their
young pitching staff several years ago, and it's a big plus to Atlanta
fans to recognize that the Maddux-Glavine-Smoltz-Avery combo still has
more time to spend in the south.
|
63.1362 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:37 | 3 |
63.1363 | | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:40 | 1 |
| <---and Biggio will be in boston....
|
63.1364 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:44 | 3 |
63.1365 | correction | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:46 | 5 |
|
When did the Sox come in second??? Last time I looked they came in
first....the yankees came in second.
john
|
63.1366 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:59 | 8 |
|
> That's it now you've really p!ssed me off! NOBODY...I mean NOBODY
> insults the Boston Pops!!! I hope your cable goes out @7:55 tonight!
I don't think Paul was - the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra _is_ a world
class Orchestra with an international reputation.
Joe
|
63.1367 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 17:59 | 4 |
| > Avery will be pitching for the Indians next year.
Dream on.
|
63.1368 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 11 1995 18:02 | 7 |
| > I don't think Paul was - the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra _is_ a world
> class Orchestra with an international reputation.
No one said they weren't. However, they generally don't play the same
kind of music and give the same kind of concerts. It's like comparing
the music at the Met with the Grand Ole Opry. I wouldn't say one was
greater than the other (Groaner might).
|
63.1369 | Now back to Baseball | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 11 1995 18:06 | 7 |
| > I don't think Paul was - the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra _is_ a world
> class Orchestra with an international reputation.
All I know is that the Pops did the theme to Star Wars....now that is
world class!
john
|
63.1370 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 11 1995 18:26 | 3 |
63.1371 | | GLRMAI::FINIZIO | | Wed Oct 11 1995 18:30 | 7 |
|
Paul & Chappy ignore it......If the Yankees didn't loose and if the
tribe didn't loose game one last night the attention would have to
still be focused on the sox pitifull playoff performance....by talking
about the Yankees so-called choking the tribe loss last night the
attention is drawn away from MVP Vaughn and Madona's Boyfriend...
|
63.1372 | hello...hello...hello | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 11 1995 18:30 | 1 |
| is there an echo in here??
|
63.1373 | talk about tiebreakers | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Oct 11 1995 19:03 | 2 |
63.1374 | | SALEM::DODA | Ask me about my vow of silence | Wed Oct 11 1995 19:07 | 13 |
| <<< Note 63.1371 by GLRMAI::FINIZIO >>>
>by talking
>about the Yankees so-called choking
Up 2 games to none and needing only 1 win in the last 3 games to
clinch it. Holding leads in two of those games, one as large as 5
runs and still losing. Exactly what do you call that Bob?
And he should've sent Leyritz up there the first time shouldn't he?
daryll
|
63.1375 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 11 1995 20:51 | 11 |
|
>> Avery will be pitching for the Indians next year.
> Dream on.
Not my idea of a dream, that's for certain. I'm not at all
convinced that Avery will, from this point forward, be a very
effective pitcher. There are a _lot_ of other pitchers I'd
rather take a chance on...
Joe
|
63.1376 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 11 1995 22:02 | 3 |
63.1377 | | WMGEN1::abs002p3.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Wed Oct 11 1995 23:43 | 1 |
| Is that a 95 or 98 % thing?
|
63.1378 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 00:28 | 5 |
63.1379 | Game 3 shocker in the making | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | N.E. Patriots...Bound to win one. | Thu Oct 12 1995 04:08 | 13 |
| Cleveland at 5 Final
Seattle 2
The tribe takes game 2 tying up the series 1-1. Hargrove comes
out with a stunner....A little known player who has been overlooked
on the roster will start game 3........Paul Gronowski!!! He has
proven what he has time and time again, Big head, Big mouth, and no
clue.8-))
C'mon Seattle!
Lil Ed
|
63.1380 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 08:29 | 3 |
63.1381 | MMMMM | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Thu Oct 12 1995 09:11 | 11 |
|
Yeah the Yanks really hurt themselves spending all that money for
Cone/McDowell/Sierra/etc...
Good thing we didn't trade our best pitching prospect for a
reliever that is going back to Minnesota. But he helped someone in the
playoffs vs Cleveland!!!
Chap
|
63.1382 | or artiste if you are french | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 09:16 | 3 |
63.1383 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 09:16 | 3 |
63.1384 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 09:30 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1380 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> No clue? This from Lil Ed who predicted a sweep in the Division Series
> - BY BOSTON! Ha ha ha... fool.
He was close, the Braves only lost one game.
George
|
63.1385 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 09:44 | 4 |
63.1386 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 09:51 | 7 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1385 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> Check the map out pal, Atlanta ain't Boston. The Braves left ...
GET OUT!!!
George
|
63.1387 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Parcells must go... | Thu Oct 12 1995 10:06 | 11 |
|
Paul,
Who has more wins in the postseason, Dennis Martinez or Roger
Clemens?
Roger Clemens has one and Martinez has zip.
Ron
|
63.1388 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Parcells must go... | Thu Oct 12 1995 10:08 | 7 |
|
Great pitching by Hershisher last night. Didn't see all of the
game. However, ESPN was saying that between innings 2-8. Hershisher
didn't throw more then 10 pitches in an inning. Which is remarkable
in any game, never mind postseason.
Ron
|
63.1389 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 10:24 | 11 |
63.1390 | just curious... | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Thu Oct 12 1995 10:40 | 12 |
| > Who has more post season wins - Orel Hershiser or the entire Red Sox
> pitching staff?
> 'nuff said
How many wins does Hershiser have??? And how many does Z.Smith,
Aggy, Wakefield, Clemens, Stanton, Belinda have??? I know Aggy was the
winner of the infamous game 6 in '86 while with the mets, and Wakefield
won a couple for pitt.....
john
|
63.1391 | Cleveland == fairweather fans | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Oct 12 1995 10:46 | 11 |
|
When Brent Musberger committed that minor faux pas by
calling the Mariners fans "frontrunners" and saying for
"the last 19 years you couldn't give tickets away here",
he could just have easily been talking about Cleveland
as well. Spout all the nonsense you want, Groiner but
inspite of the years of futility Boston is still one
of the best baseball towns in America. Cleveland, on
the other hand, is one down year from turning Jacobs
Field into a mausoleum.
|
63.1392 | Shut up Brent, just please shut up... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Still just a rat in a cage | Thu Oct 12 1995 10:49 | 9 |
|
> When Brent Musberger committed that minor faux pas by
> calling the Mariners fans "frontrunners" and saying for
> "the last 19 years you couldn't give tickets away here",
> he could just have easily been talking about Cleveland
> as well.
Oh, baby!
|
63.1393 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 10:51 | 7 |
| At one point in the middle of the game last night there seemed to be some
sort of chant going on. It was right when Musburger was doing his living eulogy
to Jim Kaat. Anyone know what the fans were saying? I couldn't make it out.
It wasn't the Edgar chant, I think Vizquel was up but I'm not sure.
George
|
63.1394 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 10:57 | 9 |
63.1395 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 11:01 | 5 |
| Hey, Boston won the 1st World Series back in 1903, why do we need another?
As the saying goes, "Been there, done that".
On to something else,
George
|
63.1396 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Parcells must go... | Thu Oct 12 1995 11:10 | 19 |
|
Paul,
I'm not whining or being a cry baby. The Sox lost to a better
team, 'nuff said.
However you continue to single out INDIVIDUAL players. In
particular you keep bashing Roger Clemens post season record. You
bash his 1-2 record in post season play. Which is comprised from
11 post season starts. What happend in the eight no decisions? Is
it Rogers fault, That Stanley, Shiraldy (?), and Buckner screwed
up game 6 in '86?
Name ONE Cleveland pitcher. Who has pitched in more post-season
games for Cleveland. Then Roger Clemens has for the Red Sox. Answer:
You can't find one. Did the Sox win the World Series in '86, '88, or
'90. NO, Did they have a better chance then Cleveland in those years?
YES.
Ron
|
63.1397 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 11:21 | 15 |
63.1398 | Clevelanders == fairweather fans | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Oct 12 1995 11:37 | 15 |
|
>> If you remove Fenway and put a 70,000+ stadium in Boston that was built
>> in 1932, does Red Sox attendance increase or decrease?
Kill the weak excuses. It ain't like you *had* to sit in nosebleed
seats. For the last twenty years or more, you could go to Municipal
Stadium and get great seats on either baseline at gametime. That's
how pathetic the fan support was. And we're not talking about New York,
LA, Chicago or San Francisco where there are a mulitude of entertain-
ment options. We're talking about a town, where until they built the
rock and roll hall of fame, the main form of entertainment was going
down to the highway and cheering for the out of state trucks.
|
63.1399 | So I took her to Cleveland | SALEM::DODA | Ask me about my vow of silence | Thu Oct 12 1995 11:44 | 3 |
| The punchline.
I'm sure you know the joke.
|
63.1400 | In reality, removing great team/stadium factors... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Still just a rat in a cage | Thu Oct 12 1995 11:48 | 8 |
|
> -< Clevelanders == fairweather fans >-
Cleveland == football town, minus the football team...
glenn
|
63.1401 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 11:57 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1397 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> Name one AL team that has won less WS titles than the Red Sox in the
> last 75 years.
Name one AL team that has won less WS titles than the Indians in the last
46 years. Big deal.
There is an AL team that has gone longer than the Red Sox. The White Sox
have not won since 1917.
> Indians will rule. You baby sox fans who can't take the sweep will
> soon be on Atlanta's bandwagon. Sox fans are proving why bandwagon
> jumping is synonymous with Boston Sports fans.
I've been a Braves fan since I moved to Boston 5 years ago. And I've got
the proof. I selected the Braves as the basis for my SNAL Rotisserie team
back around 1990 before anyone knew they were any good.
GO BRAVES!!!!
George
|
63.1402 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Oct 12 1995 12:56 | 4 |
63.1403 | this one got me rolling! ;-) | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Oct 12 1995 12:57 | 2 |
63.1404 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 12 1995 13:24 | 10 |
| > Will the Indians sweep in Cleveland? Johnson *MUST* win tonight or
> its over - Bosio and Benes are done. Hershiser will win the series
> on Sunday night for the tribe. Yahoo!
Sort of agree with Paul on this one, except the game is tomorrow instead
of today, but Seattle must win game three, just as Cleveland had to win
last night. Seattle is 28-3 in games Johnson has started this year, so
there is an excellent chance he will. That would return HFA to the
Mariners, and would probably send Martinez against the M's in game 4
instead of Hill.
|
63.1405 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 13:25 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1402 by OUTSRC::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>
>> Check the map out pal, Atlanta ain't Boston. The Braves left because
>> they were tired of playing in the "City of Losers"!
>
> they've really done a lot since then too.
The Braves won it all in 1957 while they were in Milwaukee.
That was the team with Hank Aaron, Lou Burdette, Warren Spahn, Eddie Mathews,
Del Crandal, etc.
George
|
63.1406 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Oct 12 1995 13:26 | 1 |
63.1407 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 13:48 | 5 |
63.1408 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 13:52 | 9 |
| When you children leave home are they no longer your kids?
The Braves played in Boston for 76 years. They were only IN Milwaukee for 12
and Atlanta for about 30.
Home plate is still in place at Braves Stadium in Boston.
GO BRAVES!!!
George
|
63.1409 | i rest my case | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:02 | 2 |
63.1410 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:17 | 4 |
63.1411 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:18 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1409 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> -< i rest my case >-
>
> So George, how many Boston Braves did you go to?
I'm trying really hard to parse this question. Are you sure you want to rest
your case this early? If you do I'll probably win on a summary judgment.
How does one go to a Boston Brave?
George
|
63.1412 | Oh, thanks for the swell nappy | AKOCOA::BREEN | Onions, Tortellini and Thou | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:19 | 10 |
| I went to Braves field and saw Sam Jethroe play, he had been rookie of
^^^^^^
the year in 1950. And I had Torgeson and Logan and Spahn and others in
their glorious Boston braves attire, still my favorite rags.
But I was born into the Redsox side of a multi-baseball family, my
aunts were Braves fans and like many stayed Braves fans during the
hiatus - yes, some still expect them back.
bte
|
63.1413 | Friend and I concluded this the other night... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:28 | 7 |
|
> At one point in the middle of the game last night there seemed to be some
> sort of chant going on. It was right when Musburger was doing his living eulogy
> to Jim Kaat. Anyone know what the fans were saying? I couldn't make it out.
Cooo-bain! Cooo-bain!
|
63.1414 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:31 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1410 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> Well, answer the question. Have you ever been to a *BOSTON* Braves
> game, or are you using the history of the team as an excuse to jump
> on the Atlanta Braves bandwagon - either way, its a bandwagon jump.
Well I guess it depends on how you define a bandwagon jump. I've always been
a BoSox fan but I've been a Braves fan since I moved to Boston about 10 years
ago. When I was living in Western Mass I was a BoSox fan first and a Giants fan
2nd because the New York Giants use to have a minor league team in Springfield
Mass.
How long have you been an Indian's fan? When did you jump on the Indian's
bandwagon?
George
|
63.1415 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Parcells must go... | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:34 | 5 |
| re .1414,
Better yet, Has the Tribe won a Championship in your lifetime Paul?
Ron
|
63.1416 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:36 | 4 |
|
FWIW, I'm convinced that the Indians will win Friday, Johnson or no.
JOe
|
63.1417 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:51 | 10 |
63.1418 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 14:52 | 4 |
63.1419 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Oct 12 1995 15:43 | 14 |
|
>> I've been an Indians fan all my life.
Sure you have. Just like all those folks packing Jacobs
Field these days. You guys just didn't go to games before
because:
a) Municipal was a big old park.
b) the sun was in your eyes.
c) the baseball schedule often conflicted with
Gilligan's Island reruns.
d) your dog ate your homework
e) all of the above
|
63.1420 | whatever you say OJ... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 16:22 | 4 |
63.1421 | ;-) | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Oct 12 1995 16:23 | 1 |
63.1422 | And I have to say I'm thoroughly enjoying it!!! | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Thu Oct 12 1995 16:41 | 3 |
| Groaner, give it up man! You're getting torched!
Steve
|
63.1423 | Sox fans wear diapers! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 16:50 | 18 |
63.1424 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 17:07 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1417 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> I've been an Indians fan all my life.
>
> Bandwagon jumping - having a lame excuse to root for a team. Example -
> I moved to Boston 10 years ago, and that's when I became a Braves fan.
So what's your reason for being an Indians fan? If moving to an area is a
lame excuse then living in that area from the start must be almost as lame.
If you can't come up with a good excuse for why you have been an Indian's
fan all your life then you must be an Indians Band Wagon jumper.
George
|
63.1425 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 12 1995 17:11 | 7 |
63.1426 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Thu Oct 12 1995 17:21 | 9 |
| RE: .1423
Excellent response, Paul! Perfect example of GroNOlogic!
GroNOlogic :== Distort principles of logic to promote own message of
illogic. Typically practiced by mentally constipated
Clevelanders.
Steve
|
63.1427 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Parcells must go... | Thu Oct 12 1995 17:22 | 12 |
|
Paul,
You keep leaving out that I said "The Sox lost to a better
team". I'm not disapointed that the Sox lost. The Indians earned the
sweep and I congradulated them on it.
Actually I have seen MY TEAM win the World Series in my lifetime.
Do I dare say I was born and raised on Long Island NY. Was a Mets fan
until I moved to Mass. at a young age of 7. Became a Red Sox fan, but
still follow the Mets.
Ron
|
63.1428 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 12 1995 17:24 | 37 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1425 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> Which excuse is more lame?
>
> 1) I was born in the city and followed the team since childhood.
>
> 2) I moved to the city where the team was founded, of course the
> team had been gone for some 30 years by the time I moved there.
Well, considering that there is only one reason for sports and that reason is
entertainment, I'd say that you can be a fan for any reason that moves you.
Think about it. Why should anyone be a fan of any team? Most people don't
know the owners, they don't know the players, most of the players come from
somewhere else, why should anyone care how a bunch of guy's from somewhere else
that they've never met win or lose? And to top it off, it's only a game with no
real meaning what ever. Why care who wins at all?
The answer is, you care because you want to care. You identify with the team
for what ever reason you feel like identifying with the team.
While I was in Western Mass I was a Giants fan in part because I hung around
with older kids that had stories about how they use to go to minor league
Giants games before the big league club moved out west and their minor league
team left Springfield. And part of it was because I liked Willie Mays.
Now I'm a Braves fan because some of the older people in town talk about how
the team was once here and because I go by their old park all the time. I've
read about the old Braves teams and what it was like when they were in Boston.
It's a connection with Boston's history. I also like them because they are on
TBS and they are the National League team we get to see and I like them because
I feel like it.
Is that lame? Of course it's lame. Liking any team is lame. Your "I've been
a fan all my life" is lame. But so what, it's fun.
George
|
63.1429 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Oct 12 1995 17:31 | 40 |
|
>> Anyone who knows me personally
Has my sympathy.
>> They just can't accept that the Sox lost to the Indians so
>> they question all Indians fans,
I questioned Indians fans before it was even determined that
they'd even be playing the Sox in the playoffs. Baseball in
Cleveland for years was the very definition of apathy. Then all
of a sudden management puts together an admittedly great team
and the 'lifelong fans' come crawling out of the woodwork. I
ain't buying. I'm sure Glen hit the nail on the head when he
said that Cleveland is a football town. A losing baseball team
in Don King's hometown, new stadium or no, would draw just like
Cleveland always had for years and years and years. Poorly.
Beyond poorly. Like second helpings on the punch at Jonestown.
But enjoy it while it last because in this era of big money and
free agency it probably won't last all that long and then you'll
see Jacobs Field do a slow metamorphosis into the same empty
no man's land that was Municipal Stadium.
BTW - this new influx of New England Patriots fans is no
different. BBT (Before Big Tuna) there'd often be
as many fans from the opposing team at Foxboro as
there were Pats fans. Especially if the Bill, Jets
or Giants were in town. And the lame ass stadium
excuse that Clevelanders like to use wasn't the
reason why because they still play in the same place
and yet ABT (After Big Tuna) there's real hope and
the parking lot at Foxboro on select Sundays is full
and alive with the sounds of the Village People and
the smell of overcooked chateau briande. But all it
will take is two or three losing seasons and Kraft
and company will find out that Boston belongs to
the Sox and the Bruins.
|
63.1430 | show some mercy | AKOCOA::BREEN | Onions, Tortellini and Thou | Thu Oct 12 1995 17:43 | 5 |
| Tommy,
Don't tell them those are reruns, you have a truly cruel streak,
young fella.
bte
|
63.1431 | Tommy - Captain Analogy | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Thu Oct 12 1995 18:00 | 6 |
| >>Like second helpings on the punch at Jonestown.
Where do you come up with these gems?
Thanks for the laugh,
Mike
|
63.1432 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 12 1995 18:09 | 17 |
| > But enjoy it while it last because in this era of big money and
> free agency it probably won't last all that long and then you'll
> see Jacobs Field do a slow metamorphosis into the same empty
> no man's land that was Municipal Stadium.
Cleveland has done a good job a tying up some of its younger players
to longer term contracts, so it may be a while before these Indians
become as pathetic as the teams Groaner is used to rooting for. I
do agree that if the front office doesn't stay on top of things,
Cleveland is probably not a franchise that will attract the types of
players on the free agent market to enable them to compete.
Just like anywhere, fans in Cleveland are not going to attend lower
division baseball year after year. Boston fans didn't prior to '67,
and wouldn't if the Sox sank to the depths the Indians had played at
prior to the last couple of seasons.
|
63.1433 | paul, remember when.... | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | N.E. Patriots...Bound to win one. | Fri Oct 13 1995 00:13 | 6 |
| All this talk about bandwagon jumping from paul makes me chuckle.
Does anybody recall the string of "my favorite hockey team has always
been..." from paul last season? That favorite team being the one
winning the series at that time.
Lil Ed
|
63.1434 | I'm pissed now..... | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Oct 13 1995 10:12 | 48 |
|
I've been out sick a few days this week, and in between that
I'm working on the project from hell.
I get some mail this morning from a RON who's a little put off
by the "really bad LDUC" going on in Sports.
I come in here and take a look, and then decided I must be
in the Kindergarten conference.
I'm getting a little bit tired of all of the insults and personal
attacks and stuff like that. If you're happy your team won,
fine, great, good I'm glad for you. That doesn't give you the
right to disparage anyone else, their team, their fans, and make
sniping remarks about it. We are SUPPOSEDLY adults.
If your team didn't win, it's great to be happy that someone else's
team didn't win, but you don't have to throw insults and personal
remarks around. You don't have to snipe either. Again, we
are SUPPOSEDLY adults.
This is not the Cleveland is or isn't better than Boston note.
This is not the my team is great your team wears diapers note.
This is the Cleveland Indians note, and last time I looked,
Cleveland was playing in the ALCS. Would any of you fine noters
have something CONSTRUCTIVE to say about that by any chance??????
You wanna do that insult stuff, get a newsreader, surf the Usenet
newsgroups with all the 12 years old from America On-Line that are
so upset that they can't find the dirty pictures on the net that
they resort to telling you that <insert team name> fans are
homosexuals. I mean, that's where I'm thinking some of this
bullshit I've been reading belongs.
Clean it up people. I don't know if it's something in the water,
or something in the air, but this stuff stops and it stops here.
And it stops NOW.
'Saw
|
63.1435 | 'nuff said! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 13 1995 10:26 | 9 |
63.1436 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Oct 13 1995 23:38 | 13 |
|
Well, I was wrong about Johnson - I expected his heavy workload
of late to hurt him, and it hasn't noticably...
OTOH, as of ten minutes ago at least (I hereby note that I _hate_
following Tribe playoff games on WWW, though it's better than
nothing...), the game's tied. Nagy was every bit as good as
Johnson.
I really hope they pull out the win...
Joe (just in the mood to talk to myself, and _not_ work for a
minute...)
|
63.1437 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Sat Oct 14 1995 00:20 | 2 |
|
Bleck.
|
63.1438 | You are what you use | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | N.E. Patriots...Bound to win one. | Sat Oct 14 1995 05:28 | 25 |
| In response to note .1434,
Note 245.6 Colorado Avalanche
6 of 14
CAM::WAY "Nine to the front, six to the rear" 6 lines
13-OCT-1995 09:18
The Queebs by any other name are still the Queebs....
Bruins sucked pond water against these guys. One "LUCKY" goal.
Kasper the Friendly Coach sucks.
Do you remember this note?!?!?! Practice what you preach!;^)
Lil Ed
|
63.1439 | Be nice or the principle will yell again... | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Sat Oct 14 1995 09:54 | 7 |
| Jay Buhner, goes from hero to goat to hero in the same game......
M's take a 2-1 lead in the series........tonights(sat) game is a must
win for the tribe or they are in serious trouble.......Hill goes for
the Tribe, Benes for the M's....Is this Hill's first ever post season
start?????
john
|
63.1440 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Oct 14 1995 10:06 | 2 |
63.1441 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Sat Oct 14 1995 23:55 | 11 |
|
Re .1440
Good call...
Thankfully, it didn't matter.
It would take a lot for this _not_ to be a great series, when all's
said and done...
Joe
|
63.1442 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Oct 15 1995 13:01 | 10 |
63.1443 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 16 1995 09:55 | 8 |
| Nope, another squeaker. And it may be Wolcott in game 7.
Meanwhile the only stress on the arms of Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, and Avery
is an occasional heft to their beer mug as they sit in front of the TV watching
to see which of these teams will emerge bloody and tired to face them in the
Fall Classic.
George
|
63.1444 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:02 | 13 |
| Cleveland should lose game 6, and win game 7. However, the
Indians offense has given no real indication they are going to hit
Johnson or Wolcott hard, and I would expect a tight game in both
outings.
Things are looking pretty good for Atlanta. The Indians
"high-powered" offense has taking a nose-dive against generally
mediocre Seattle pitching. What will it do against a team with
the major league's best pitching staff ? The Indians better hope
that their pitching staff can continue what it is doing to a Seattle
offense that is much better than the Braves have to offer. On the
other hand, Atlanta can hope Eric Plunk continues to shine, should
Cleveland make it to the W.S.
|
63.1445 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:14 | 18 |
| ALCS:
Contributors:
Cleveland: Orel Hershiser (+++), Ken Hill (++), Kenny Lofton (++),
Jim Thome (++), Manny Ramirez (+), Paul Assenmacher (+), Jose Mesa (+).
Seattle: Bob Wolcott (++), Randy Johnson (++), Norm Charlton (++),
Jay Buhner (+).
Detractors:
Cleveland: Eric Plunk (--), Dennis Martinez (-), Omar Vizquel (-),
Paul Sorrento (-), Albert Belle (-).
Seattle: Andy Benes (---), Edgar Martinez (---), Tino Martinez (--),
Ken Griffey (-), Tim Belcher (-), Chris Bosio (-1/2).
|
63.1446 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:15 | 9 |
63.1447 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:17 | 9 |
63.1448 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:21 | 17 |
| Should be a good game Tuesday, with Johnson again shutting down
the slumbering Indian bats. Look for another close game, unless
the Martinez boys come to life. I look for a Seattle 3-1 or 3-2
victory, as the Mariners go to 5-0 in games this year when they face
elimination. Game 7 should be great; Nagy pitched much better than I
had expected he would, as did Wolcott. I would expect Belcher would
get the game 7 start, however, giving the Indians the edge they need
to move on to the W.S. Any thing less would be a major league choke
job, and the Indians have responded adequately, thus far, to the first
real pressure they have faced this year.
On the other hand, you'd really have to say both sides have played
rather sloppy baseball in this series, both on defense and offense
(not advancing runners many times, leaving many, many runners on base).
Atlanta would have to be considered slight favorites against either
team when the W.S. begins.
|
63.1449 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Anybody but Cleveland... | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:27 | 7 |
|
I see Groaner has stopped his BS in here. Just brought it over
to the Red_Sox conference. Red_Sox conference has a nice TPU file.
It allows you to extract out all of the notes. Then ignore all of
Paul's, gotta love it. Groaner_free.tpu.
Ron
|
63.1450 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:33 | 8 |
| I missed the beginning, why didn't Martinez pitch last night? Seems it was
his turn.
Everyone's expecting low scoring games but with the pitching getting more
and more tired it seems we are about due for a slugfest. It would be fun of
one of these games ends up something like 12-10.
George
|
63.1451 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Anybody but Cleveland... | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:34 | 22 |
|
On a more serious note. Great weekend of baseball. Good pitching
duel between Johnson/Nagy on Friday night. With Bunher making up
for the error. With an 11th inning homerun.
Cleveland gets great pitching from Ken Hill on Saturday. To
shutout Seattle 7-0. Albert Belle didn't play in the game. Sprained
ankle from a HBP, Friday night. Cleveland HAD to win on Saturday and
they did just that.
Last night in what I would consider another must win game for
Cleveland. The game was a little sloppy with 6 errors being
committed. Jim Thome's clutch 2 run homer in the 6th put Cleveland
ahead 3-2. The key to the game was the top of the 7th inning.
Paul Sorento committs 2 errors. I personally thought the 2nd error
was bogus. Visquel's foot didn't come off the bag, until after he
had the ball. Anyways, first and third 1 out. With Griffey coming to
the plate. Paul Assenmacher strikes him out on 4 pitches. He then
gets Buhner to strike out also. Griffey just needed to get the ball
in play, to tie the game.
The eight inning was just as exciting. Could Sojo have hit the
ball any harder? Oh, well on to Seattle Tuesday night.
Ron
|
63.1452 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:38 | 4 |
63.1453 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:43 | 3 |
| Martinez, why didn't he pitch?
George
|
63.1454 | \ | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:44 | 25 |
| > Last night in what I would consider another must win game for
> Cleveland. The game was a little sloppy with 6 errors being
> committed. Jim Thome's clutch 2 run homer in the 6th put Cleveland
> ahead 3-2. The key to the game was the top of the 7th inning.
> Paul Sorento committs 2 errors. I personally thought the 2nd error
> was bogus. Visquel's foot didn't come off the bag, until after he
> had the ball. Anyways, first and third 1 out. With Griffey coming to
> the plate. Paul Assenmacher strikes him out on 4 pitches. He then
> gets Buhner to strike out also. Griffey just needed to get the ball
> in play, to tie the game.
I agree completely. This was a must game for Cleveland, a loss would
have left them facing Seattle with a well-rested Johnson on Wednesday,
if needed, and a 4-3 series loss. Their defense was poor last night
(although I agree Vizquel was not pulled off the bag), but Assenmacher
did the job. In fact, the seventh inning of game 5 will turn out to be
the most important inning of the series. I expected a fly ball by
Griffey to get the run in, but he chased a bad ball for strike three.
Neither side is hitting in the clutch in this series. Cleveland is 1 for
13 in this series with the bases loaded. Seattle isn't driving in runners
in scoring position, either. Both bullpens are pitching well in the
clutch situations, not surprising for Cleveland, but a little surprising
Seattle is doing such a fine job. Eric Plunk is the only guy I would
look at in either bullpen as not performing as he should in this series.
|
63.1455 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:49 | 15 |
| > Martinez, why didn't he pitch?
>
> George
It was a must game for Cleveland, and Hershiser seems to be much more
of a sure victory at this point than Martinez. Bosio-Martinez could be a
Seattle victory (especially the way it went last night), then Hershiser
would be wasted in Tuesday's loss to Randy Johnson. I'm sure Cleveland was
thinking, if we can get a split of the next two, we'll take our chances in
game 7 against Wolcott or Belcher. They know they probably won't beat the
Big Unit, no matter who pitches, so why not do all they can to win game 5 ?
Good strategy by Hargrove, in my opinion. OTOH, why they let Plunk pitch
to Sojo last night is beyond me. A bit of luck by the Indians let Hargrove
get by with that mistake.
|
63.1456 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Oct 16 1995 10:54 | 9 |
|
Why didn't they atleast try to pitch to Martinez on friday? I mean
the minute they walked him I knew it was over. You had figure Buher
was angry over the misplay not to mention he almost took off Mesa
head in the 9th. Also if lefties can't hit lefties why isn't righties
can't hit righties? I've never figured this one out. You're either a
hitter or you're not.............
mike
|
63.1457 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 16 1995 11:02 | 4 |
| I'm not sure I remember this inning correctly, but didn't they
pitch to Martinez until they got to a 3-ball count, then (with
first base opne) they walked him ? Maybe I'm thinking about a
different inning.
|
63.1458 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 16 1995 11:07 | 15 |
63.1459 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Oct 16 1995 11:15 | 5 |
|
Yeah Rich, that was the situation it's was 3-1 to Martinez with 1st
open and they just gave it to him. I realize the prevailing wisdom is
to set up the double play but emotions do come into play also. I'd
have tried to get Martinez and then walked Buhner........
|
63.1460 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 16 1995 11:15 | 8 |
| Regarding Randy Johnson:
Seattle is 30-3 in games he has started this year, 1-0 in games
he has relieved.
Against left-handers, he is almost invincible: Left-handed hitters
have hit only .188 against him since 1988. No left-hander has hit a
home run off Johnson since 1992.
|
63.1461 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Oct 16 1995 11:20 | 5 |
|
but why is that? I'm left-handed I can't remeber having any more
problems hitting or k'ing aginst lefties than I did righties...
mike
|
63.1462 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 16 1995 11:21 | 2 |
| One other statistic: Hershiser's victory in game 2 gave the Indians
a 7-20 record in their last 27 games in Seattle (about 4 years).
|
63.1463 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 16 1995 11:30 | 24 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1461 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Washing Machine" >>>
> but why is that? I'm left-handed I can't remeber having any more
> problems hitting or k'ing aginst lefties than I did righties...
Maybe this is because you only made it to AAA and didn't make the majors.
In general the difference between a AAA pitcher and a decent big league
pitcher is that a big league pitcher can throw the curve for a strike pretty
much when ever needed. The AAA pitcher can't depend on throwing breaking stuff
for a strike and has to rely on the fast ball once they get behind in the count.
That's why Mo struggled so much his 1st full season. In the minors if he got
behind they had to throw him a fast ball but once the big league pitchers
figured out he couldn't hit the breaking stuff that's all he saw. Once he
learned to at least fight off the curve he developed into a 1st class power
hitter.
Since the curve breaks away from a hitter hitting from the same side as the
pitcher it's that much harder for the batter to hit. Hence the edge. Curves
that break down and in are not as much trouble because the batter can reach
them easily and foul them off.
George
|
63.1464 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Oct 16 1995 11:45 | 15 |
| Cleveland better win this thing. Hey Groaner and Joe, I thought the Yanks
had Seattle "in the bag" by only having to win one of the last 3... :^(
At least there's no way you'll see Johnson in both games.
I think Hargrove has made some bad decisions in this series. Plunk has
ALWAYS been a pitcher who CANNOT pitch under pressure. Hargrove did his
lefty-righty relief substitution until he put himself in a position of
having to pitch Plunk with the game on the line in both Games 3 & 5.
He lucked-out last night.
And Groaner, can you explain why Vizquel is trying to BUNT in the 8th
in Game 3 with the winning run on 2B ???????????????? Since LL most
hitters are drilled with the thought -> "bring him in !....don't leave
it up to the next guy !!". Very weak.
|
63.1465 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 16 1995 12:29 | 4 |
63.1466 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Oct 16 1995 14:35 | 7 |
|
Forget about the pitching rotations, the real question is
will Albert Belle fake another injury for game 6 thereby
ensuring the Indians another easy victory like game 4 or
will he embarass himself again both in the field and at the
plate and make a close game of it like he did in game 5?
|
63.1467 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Oct 17 1995 09:30 | 8 |
|
Will Johnson have enough left to do what it takes tonight?
I don't think so, though I was wrong about that on Friday...
I still believe the Tribe will win tonight...
Joe
|
63.1468 | bank on it | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 17 1995 09:57 | 3 |
63.1469 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Anybody but Cleveland... | Tue Oct 17 1995 10:37 | 14 |
|
I think the series is going 7 games. Randy Johnson is 31-5 since
May 1994. Seattle is 30-3 this year when Johnson starts. The odds are
with Johnson and Seattle. Randy has learned how to pitch. Even if
he is tired and can't throw a 96MPH heater by somebody. He still finds
a way to get them out.
On the other side of the fence. The Indians starting pitching
has been tremendous the entire playoffs. All of there starters have
gone into the 7th inning. Plus, have only allowed 6 earned runs in
the 5 games. With only 27 hits in 35.1 innings pitched.
All in all should be a great game tonight. With Seattle winning
the game 3-2.
Ron
|
63.1470 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 17 1995 10:54 | 5 |
| I wonder what happens to "Mr. Snappy" when Randy Johnson gets tired?
I wonder if the Indians really want to know?
George
|
63.1471 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Oct 17 1995 11:13 | 3 |
|
Actually, if Johnson's tired, I'd be just as scarred of Mr. Snappy
in the dugout as at the plate...
|
63.1473 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Oct 17 1995 12:13 | 2 |
|
A fastball Johnson throws from the back of his hand...
|
63.1474 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Oct 17 1995 12:16 | 8 |
|
>> Who is Mr. Snappy?
It's from a commercial, Karen. Johnson shows a number
of contrived grips and then they cut to a piece of game
footage and show the effect. Mr Snappy is supposedly thrown
with the ball resting on the back of the hand. The effect
is that he hits batters with it.
|
63.1475 | normally enough for johnson, but not now | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 17 1995 13:43 | 4 |
63.1476 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 17 1995 13:48 | 14 |
| Depends on whether the Twin Martinez wake up or not. If Edgar starts hitting
the way he did on that last swing in game 5 the Indians could be in trouble.
Of course the odds are with the Indians. They are the better team and they
are up by a game but being better in baseball means having a .550 to .600
chance of winning which is not all that great. And with Mr Snappy on the mound
it's more like 50-50.
Everyone keeps predicting a continuation of the pitcher duels that have been
common for both championship series but you never know. If it ends up a
slugfest that wouldn't be the 1st time a predicted pitchers duel went by the
boards.
George
|
63.1477 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Anybody but Cleveland... | Tue Oct 17 1995 15:04 | 8 |
|
An interesting stat that Costas brought up the other night. The
Indians had a .694 winning percentage during the regular season. While
the Mariners had a .545 winning percentage during the regular season.
In the history of MLB. No teams with that big a discrepency. Have ever
faced each other during the post season.
Ron
|
63.1478 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Oct 17 1995 17:36 | 1 |
| How many teams have ever finished with something close to a .694 winning % ?
|
63.1479 | not many | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Oct 17 1995 18:28 | 6 |
| Well 107 wins is the 154 game equivelant and there you have the Chicago
team with 116,'54 indians with 111, and maybe '27 yanks, 29-32 A's
Not many. '61 yanks had 110 in a 162 game season (.6%%?)
|
63.1480 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 17 1995 23:49 | 3 |
63.1481 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 18 1995 01:05 | 33 |
|
Wow.
Some thoughts:
1) Seattle played an excellent series. They have nothing to
be ashamed of.
2) Pinella should have pulled Johnson earlier. It was clear to
_me_ he was through.
3) Johnson gave a _great_ effort. His performance from the
Seattle/California playoff game through tonight was
exempliary.
4) I don't for the life of me know how to react to the victory
tonight. In all my life as a Cleveland sports fan, I've
never seen a team achieve this level of success, and have
developed a feeling of dread, as I _know_ something's
going to go wrong whenever my team comes close. This time
it didn't happen, and I'm still not sure I believe it. It's
going to take a while for this to sink in.
5) I'll be _amazed_ if Wilson recovers from this. He's never
been anything resembling a great player, and this year
represents his peak. I guess amazed is a bit strong, but
surprised fits...
6) There is no #6.
7) Go Tribe! 1-0 in World Series vs. the Braves... B^)
Joe
|
63.1482 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Cleveland Indians are king, Eddie Murray is gawd... | Wed Oct 18 1995 09:04 | 6 |
|
Well, I'll definitely be rooting for the Tribe vs the Bills - I mean, Braves...
I spent a lot of last night taking care of my kids - what happened? I got to
watch about 5 minutes in the 3rd inning. Johnson looked pretty good, but he
was relying on his breaking ball a lot more than usual...
|
63.1483 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Wed Oct 18 1995 09:13 | 25 |
| Roland,
Sometime around the 5th inning, there was a ground ball hit to Joey
Cora, who after making a nice play on the previous batter,
unnecessarily gunned a throw to first with Johnson covering and it got
by him (another play I felt Wilson the catcher screwed up on), allowing
the batter to reach second. Kenny Lofton drove him in with a single to
left. Later this inning, Coleman led off with a single, stole 2nd and
Cora popped up a sacrifice bunt attempt. Griffey flied out to the
warning track which would have brought in a run had Cora gotten the bunt
down.
In the 8th Pena led off with a double to right center. Lofton dropped a
nice bunt and stole 2nd. Still nobody out. Johnson threw a fastball
about 6 inches high and outside the strike zone and it got by Wilson.
The ball rolled to the Indians dugout scoring the guy on 3rd. As Wilson
and Johnson nonchalantly played the passed ball, Lofton rounded 3rd and
also scored easily. Carlos Baerga (a guy that I've definitely grown to
admire this series) followed that up with a homer to center. 4 to zip
just like that. Seattle couldn't do anything and that's the way the
game ended.
Excellent performance by Cleveland and Seattle's well finally dried up.
Steve
|
63.1484 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 18 1995 09:31 | 24 |
|
More thoughts...
1) I've still got butterflies. In my lifetime, the only time time
I've rooted for _my_ team in a championship series is the
1994 Crunch, and they were never _my_ team to the extent that
the Tribe, Browns, Cavs, or even Force were...
2) I can't wait to see the Tribe pitchers hit.
3) I hope Seattle fans get to keep their team.
4) The most dramatic shot after the game had to be Cora, crying
in the dugout, and Alex Rodriguez comforting him. One couldn't
help but feel bad for Cora - he gave the series everything he
had.
5) I still don't understand why Pinella (who, IMHO, is _not_ good
at at least one important piece of managing - player development)
didn't use Rodriguez more. This was true all season; just when
I thought Pinella had woken up and given Rodriguez the job,
Sojo or Fermin or whoever was back at SS.
Joe
|
63.1485 | Now beat those NL bums | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Wed Oct 18 1995 09:34 | 9 |
| To Paul G and Joe H congrats on your team making it to the World
Series. They were the dominant team in the AL this year and earned the
crown. This might be the first WS since 1986 that I'll watch. And for
all of the people who say Small markets cann't compete today with the
New York's,LA and Chicago markets I give you 2 prime reasons on how to
build a baseball organization in "Small Markets" The Braves and the
Indians. America's first Politically Incorrect World Series.
Mike
|
63.1486 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 18 1995 09:44 | 11 |
|
> The Braves and the
> Indians. America's first Politically Incorrect World Series.
You mean Bill Maher is announcing? Cool - a big improvement over
Mussburger & Uecker...
Joe
P.S. Wouldn't the '48 series have been retrospectively politcally
incorrect?
|
63.1487 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Wed Oct 18 1995 09:46 | 5 |
| > P.S. Wouldn't the '48 series have been retrospectively politcally
> incorrect?
Well, so would the concept of Manifest Destiny, but who's really keeping
track?
|
63.1488 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 18 1995 10:08 | 4 |
63.1489 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Oct 18 1995 10:13 | 5 |
|
While Orel was a decent choice, I can't help but feel that Kenny Lofton
got screwed out of the MVP. He was fantastic the whole series.
mike
|
63.1490 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Oct 18 1995 10:16 | 12 |
| I'm glad to see Seattle gone. Johnson couldn't pitch every game and
that's the only way they could advance. He was pitching curveballs
'cause his arm was shot. There were plenty of Cleveland hitters
pulling his pitches last night. He should be glad they're done
'cause Lou would have blown his arm had they gone to the WS.
I'm also glad we don't have to watch Dome_Ball anymore. Sorry Spud,
but it just ain't my cup-of-tea. No astroturf, or stupid "speaker"
rules, or measuring indoor decibel levels. It's bad enough we'll
have to watch that chop-chop crap.
I hope Cleveland wins, but my head says Atlanta in 5 or 6.
|
63.1491 | Wahoo... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 18 1995 10:28 | 36 |
|
Congrats to the Tribe. I'll be rooting for the Indians all the
way now, not because they're the AL rep but because I can't stand
the Braves. When much of the country fell in for the Braves due
to TBS, I went for the anti-Ted.
> 4) The most dramatic shot after the game had to be Cora, crying
> in the dugout, and Alex Rodriguez comforting him. One couldn't
> help but feel bad for Cora - he gave the series everything he
> had.
Cora's one of my favorite players in baseball. The little-guy
thing taken to the extreme. Too bad that the decisive game was
a rough one for him...
> 5) I still don't understand why Pinella (who, IMHO, is _not_ good
> at at least one important piece of managing - player development)
> didn't use Rodriguez more. This was true all season; just when
> I thought Pinella had woken up and given Rodriguez the job,
> Sojo or Fermin or whoever was back at SS.
Good point. Piniella doesn't trust youth, period. But I'd been
repeating it all series long-- Luis Sojo is not a SS. He has no
range, trouble in the pivot and isn't a good enough hitter to
justify being there. There were two plays just in last night's
game that Sojo made the valiant dives for but any self-respecting
SS would have gobbled up.
Billte's (and mine) other pet peeve: what's with the barehand crap
from Omar Vizquel? He's now making the ordinary play with the
barehand. I guess now that they're off the artificial stuff it'll
stop, but if doesn't eventually he _will_ be burned.
glenn
|
63.1492 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Anybody but Cleveland... | Wed Oct 18 1995 10:44 | 12 |
|
What a great series. Congradulations to the Indians. The
Mariners scored 6 earned runs in 6 games, enough said. Good
pitching will beat good hitting 90% of the time.
On to Atlanta for the World Series. Both teams will be rested.
Watch out for Hershisher he is on a roll. Also remember he was the
best hitting pitcher in the NL. If Clevland keeps pitching the
way they are. Atlanta won't have a chance to beat them. Atlanta is
one of the worst hitting teams in the league. Should be a couple
2-1, 3-2 ball games.
Ron
|
63.1493 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Wed Oct 18 1995 10:50 | 10 |
| Agreed on the Vizquel barehand move, Glenn. I recall once all series
where it was probably necessary, but for him to continue doing it is
only going to result in a ball spinning out of his hand eventually.
I also thought Lofton should have been the MVP.
One last request for TBN. Please keep the camera shots of Mike
"Blinky" Hargrove and Bob "Scratchy" Cox to a minimum!
Steve
|
63.1494 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Oct 18 1995 10:59 | 9 |
| I go with the Lofton for mvp
Also agree, Johnson should have been pulled after Pena's double - why
do these managers freeze like that (Gaston with Stewart in '93)
Wilson made one nice play - I suppose noone could hear anything
Probably only around Boston would anyone think of this series as a
rematch - '48 series was very close with pitching duels the rule.
|
63.1495 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 18 1995 11:11 | 98 |
| Congrats to the Indians faithful, it's been a long time.
I disagree with Joe Huber on one thing: Seattle did not play
a good series at all. Their defense was below average, their
hitters went 3-for-39 with runners in scoring position, and they
didn't play good fundamental baseball - look at all the opportunities
waisted because they failed to advance runners. Nor was Cleveland
playing that well either; they often failed in clutch situations
at the plate (1-for-12 with bases loaded, entering last night's
game), with the defense (save for Lofton and Vizquel) really looking
rather dull as well. All in all, this was a rather sloppy, though
entertaining (because of its closeness), series. Cleveland had the
huge edge in pitching entering the series, and when all was said and
done, it was the Indians' great pitching, rather than the supposed
dominant offensive machinery (which didn't do that well against a
rather mediocre Seattle pitching staff), that won the series.
If it was any other team in the National League, I'd pick the Indians
to win due to that great pitching staff. Unfortunately for them,
they are going to meet MLB's best pitching staff, and I'm going to
go for the Braves (big surprise, considering where I've been living).
OTOH, while the Braves pitchers turned in outstanding performances in
the playoffs, the team showed some distinct weaknesses that the
Indians could capitalize on:
(1) While the Braves held the Reds scoring down, their pitchers were
constantly under pressure, because almost all the Reds have enough
speed to cause havoc, and the Braves were not generating much offense at
all. For the Braves to win, they are going to have to score at least
3 runs a game off the Indians. It might be easier against the Indians
right-handed staff, rather than the left-handers the Reds threw, but
it might not. You can't count on game-winning home runs from O'Brien
and Deveraux very often; but, the Braves big guns will be facing a
group of right-handed starters this time, and the Jones-McGriff-Justice-
Klesko power numbers are A LOT higher vs right handers than lefties.
(2) The Braves pitchers were in trouble a lot, but pitched out of it.
The Braves two best starters, Maddux and Glavine, are great not because
they have overpowering stuff, but because they know the N.L. hitters
and their weaknesses as well as anyone in the league, and they have the
greatness to hit the exact spots when needed. This implies two things:
a) they better have extremely accurate scouting reports; and b) they
had better adjust when the A.L. umpires are at home plate. The Reds,
though they were 2nd in the NL in scoring this year, don't have the
power that Cleveland will bring to the park, and any mistakes by the
Braves' staff could be hit pretty hard. Moreover, if they can't adjust
to an AL umpire's strike zone, they could have problems; particularly
Smoltz, who flusters fairly easily (IMO).
(3) Save for Marquis Grissom, this group of Braves is slow. They rely
way to much on the HR to score. I would expect this to give advantage
to Orel Hershiser, particularly. Moreover, Dennis Martinez has had
(in the past) some of his best games against the Braves; the Braves
nemesis in recent years has been Montreal, and Martinez was a key
reason why.
Then why would the Braves have a chance ?
(1) The Braves pitchers, as a group, are superior to any Cleveland
has faced all year. No other team in the AL has a threesome like
Maddux-Glavine-Smoltz, and Avery's six-inning two-hitter in game 4
vs the Reds was typical of his pitching down the stretch (he couldn't
buy a win in July or August, but finished up strong). While the
Indians faced relatively weak staffs in Boston and Seattle during the
post-season, they meet the only club in baseball with better starters
than theirs, and a team with a bullpen as good as theirs, with W.S.
experience to boot. How many times did Cleveland meet a closer who
usually throws in the 97-100 mph range (Wohlers), a set-up man who
allows a .134 average when runners are in scoring position (McMichael),
another set-up man who throws in the 93-95 mph range (Pena), with a
veteran lefty (Mercker) in the bullpen? (Avery will pitch from there as
well, though he is MUCH more effective as a starter.)
(2) The Braves have a good defense, save for the LF position when
Klesko plays. While Boston defense is not very good, and Seattle played
a rather poor defensive series, the Braves players have rarely made
fundamental mistakes this year. McGriff is a good first baseman,
Lemke and Blauser/Belliard are very good-to-outstanding at the DP,
Grissom has been a gold glove CF, Justice has improved is thinking in
the field and has a great arm, and Lopez has one of the best arms
behind the plate in the NL (Santiago the best in that regard), while
performing very well at blocking balls in the dirt. Jones is no more
than adequate at third, but doesn't botch plays either; only Klesko is
questionable, largely because of his speed (or lack thereof). Also,
Braves pitchers field their positions better than any staff in the NL;
nor do they walk many nor hit many batters, though none are really
great at holding runners on at first. Cleveland hitters are going
to have to earn any runs they get against a group of pitchers very
tough to hit.
(3) The Braves have experience, and HFA. These two advantages could
play a factor in this series.
(4) While Bobby Cox can be questioned regarding his strategy, I can't
see much talent at all in Mike Hargrove's managing ability. In this
battle of negatives (from my perspective), the Braves get away with
having the "less worse" manager leading the team.
|
63.1496 | This is a hell of a matchup... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 18 1995 11:21 | 17 |
|
While I'm rooting for the Indians, I think the Braves are going to
win. I think it's time for Greg Maddux to rise to the fore in the
postseason. The Indians' "great" pitching is not really great:
Dennis Martinez, Orel Hershiser, Chris Nagy are pitching well, but
they are hittable and beatable. There's only one _great_ pitcher
in this series: Maddux. It says here that he'll put his postseason
problems behind him and be the difference.
Obviously, the Indians' bats have to heat up. They've been quiet
even by postseason (re: good pitching) standards. They didn't hit
the Red Sox (they walked them in the Wakefield start), much less
the Mariners. And now they're going to be looking at pitching
that's on another plane...
glenn
|
63.1497 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 18 1995 11:42 | 28 |
| > postseason. The Indians' "great" pitching is not really great:
> Dennis Martinez, Orel Hershiser, Chris Nagy are pitching well, but
> they are hittable and beatable. There's only one _great_ pitcher
> in this series: Maddux. It says here that he'll put his postseason
> problems behind him and be the difference.
Frankly, I can't agree. The Indians starters may not be great in
comparison to the Orioles startes of the early 1970's, and they don't
have a Koufax-Drysdale combo that will just shut you down (although
DD wasn't that great in the big games), but they pitch well, under control,
and you have to be patient and be willing to go the other way A LOT in
order to be effective (especially with Hershiser and Martinez). This
seems to me to be CLEARLY the second best group of starters in baseball.
In addition, their pitching style is perfectly adapted to the Braves
hitting style, at least from Cleveland's stand-point; the Braves are NOT
effective at generating runs, they go for the long-ball to win games.
OTOH, I would rate Tom Glavine as a great pitcher. He has only 1 less
win than Maddux over the last 5 years, a period in which Maddux has won
4 Cy Young awards and Glavine 1 (assuming he wins this year). In past
seasons he was used in a way such that he was very tired in September and
October, but not this year; the Braves had a big lead and a much stronger
bullpen this year than in the past, and Glavine has been very effective
down the stretch and in the post-season, in fact has outpitched Maddux for
the last 4 weeks when it has been on the line. His control is second in
the NL only to Maddux (as far as exact location of pitches), and he is the
least likely pitcher in this series to get rattled under pressure. I look
as Glavine over Martinez as much more likely than Maddux over Hershiser.
|
63.1498 | We'll see; that's what makes this game great... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 18 1995 12:04 | 15 |
|
> Frankly, I can't agree. The Indians starters may not be great in
> comparison to the Orioles startes of the early 1970's, and they don't
> have a Koufax-Drysdale combo that will just shut you down (although
> DD wasn't that great in the big games), but they pitch well, under control,
> and you have to be patient and be willing to go the other way A LOT in
> order to be effective (especially with Hershiser and Martinez). This
> seems to me to be CLEARLY the second best group of starters in baseball.
No disagreement. It's just the use of that word "great" that I've
qualified. And I think that both Martinez and Hershiser will get
roughed up in at least one start each...
glenn
|
63.1499 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Oct 18 1995 12:10 | 7 |
|
Well after watching the Indians' pitchers control the middle of the
order of both the Soxs and Mariners, I would think their scouting
staff is excellent and will again help their pitchers to control
the Braves' biggest guns and in turn win the series.....
mike
|
63.1500 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 18 1995 12:14 | 14 |
| > Well after watching the Indians' pitchers control the middle of the
> order of both the Soxs and Mariners, I would think their scouting
> staff is excellent and will again help their pitchers to control
> the Braves' biggest guns and in turn win the series.....
You wouldn't have to have quite the same level of scouting to know
the tendancies of teams you play 12-13 times a year, including in
the last 6 weeks of the season.
I do think the Indians' #1 and #2 starters will have good games against
Atlanta, but that won't necessarily be enough to win, because the Indians
will hit even less against the Braves than they did against a mediocre
Seattle pitching staff.
|
63.1501 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 18 1995 12:22 | 18 |
| I don't agree about Johnson getting pulled.
First of all, the runs were caused by throwing errors (or at least throwing
mental lapses). Yes Johnson was the one trying to catch the throws and he
hesitated before trying to throw Lofton out but those were not really pitching
problems. I doubt a relief pitcher would have played better defense.
Second, the Mariners bull pen really stinks. On other occasions Lou stayed
with Walcott and members of the 3 B's (Benes, Bosio, and Belcher) and it worked
out.
Johnson got them there and it was Johnson's game to win or lose. As it was
the home run was the only real run he gave up and the reason that was important
was only because Griffey, Martinez, Martinez, and Buhner went 1 for 13. If
they had been hitting the way they had against the Yankees Johnson would have
looked like Al Spalding.
George
|
63.1502 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 18 1995 12:27 | 18 |
| > Johnson got them there and it was Johnson's game to win or lose. As it was
>the home run was the only real run he gave up and the reason that was important
>was only because Griffey, Martinez, Martinez, and Buhner went 1 for 13. If
>they had been hitting the way they had against the Yankees Johnson would have
>looked like Al Spalding.
Johnson had lost it beginning in the seventh; his pitches didn't have the same
degree of heat, and he was getting his pitches up. Pena doubles on a high
pitch. Lofton beats out a bunt to third. Even if Wilson doesn't give up
the passed ball, Amaro (pinch running) scores on Vizquel's fly to let on a
pitch up high, and Baerga's HR on another high pitch scores Lofton as well.
Randy Johnson pitched a great game, but had run out of gas by the eighth
inning from overuse (I would guess). He was ready to be removed in favor of
Charlton at that point. Had Seattle been tied or ahead at that point, I
think we would have seen Charlton in after the Lofton bunt, but I'm not sure
of that.
|
63.1503 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Wed Oct 18 1995 12:40 | 4 |
|
Another vote for Loftin as MVP......
Claybone
|
63.1504 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Anybody but Cleveland... | Wed Oct 18 1995 12:43 | 7 |
|
Randy Johnson was pitching fine. Up until the pass ball. Once
that happened and Lofton scored from 2nd. Johnson lost his emotion
and mental edge. If there were no pass ball. I think Johnson pitches
better to Baerga and there would be no home run.
Ron
|
63.1505 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 18 1995 13:01 | 8 |
| Yeah, if the Mariners had any kind of set up man no question, the plan would
be to pull Johnson but down one to three runs in the 7th inning how are you
going to win bringing in your closer?
As it turned out he could have pitched three perfect innings in the 7th, 8th,
and 9th and they still would have lost.
George
|
63.1506 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Oct 18 1995 13:02 | 6 |
|
So I guess what you're saying Rich, is that the Indians' pitchers and
Scouts are way way better than the Yankees' cause they couldn't control
the middle of the Seattle lineup?
mike
|
63.1507 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 18 1995 16:23 | 7 |
| > So I guess what you're saying Rich, is that the Indians' pitchers and
> Scouts are way way better than the Yankees' cause they couldn't control
> the middle of the Seattle lineup?
I don't think scouts had anything to do with it, but I do think Cleveland's
pitchers are way, way better than the Yankees (no matter how you want to
measure it).
|
63.1508 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 18 1995 17:23 | 28 |
63.1509 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Wed Oct 18 1995 17:27 | 3 |
| > Murray ***WIFF***
Murray will only whiff if there aren't runners in scoring position...
|
63.1510 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 18 1995 17:39 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1508 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> Greg Maddux who? First inning game 1 -
>
> Lofton single
> Vizquel walk
> Baerga single
> Belle BA BOOM - HR
> Murray ***WIFF***
> Thome BA BOOM - HR
> Ramirez BA BOOM - HR
> Sorrento double
> Alomar single
That's quite a prediction.
One question, is someone here pinch hitting or is one of these guys going to
be listed as the pitcher when the Indians hand their starting roster to the
umpire?
George
|
63.1511 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 18 1995 17:57 | 10 |
| > One question, is someone here pinch hitting or is one of these guys going to
>be listed as the pitcher when the Indians hand their starting roster to the
>umpire?
>
> George
Whichever one it is will have to pitch to Grissom, at the least.
BTW, is anyone else wondering if the Cleveland BA BOOMs are gas noises, and
if so, what is this WIFF by Murray ?
|
63.1512 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 18 1995 18:02 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1511 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
> Whichever one it is will have to pitch to Grissom, at the least.
Well not really. The Indians will be up 1st so I suppose they could hand
the ump a lineup with all hitters designating one of those guys as a pitcher.
Of course in the bottom of the 1st they would have to substitute a real
pitcher unless Eddie Maurry is prepared to take the mound.
George
|
63.1513 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 18 1995 18:55 | 10 |
| > Well not really. The Indians will be up 1st so I suppose they could hand
>the ump a lineup with all hitters designating one of those guys as a pitcher.
>Of course in the bottom of the 1st they would have to substitute a real
>pitcher unless Eddie Maurry is prepared to take the mound.
>
> George
But they would have to have the pitcher on the line-up card pitch to at least
one batter; that's the rule. So Grissom gets his hacks against Murray, or
maybe Sorrento.
|
63.1514 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 19 1995 09:09 | 4 |
| Good point. Yeah, I don't know. But then this is Groner's idea so I suppose
he'll be along to set us straight any time now.
George
|
63.1515 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 19 1995 09:15 | 2 |
63.1516 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | May the best team win... | Fri Oct 20 1995 13:15 | 8 |
|
Just letting Paul no that I am on Vacation next week. Be
in PA doing a little deer hunting. So I won't have access to a
terminal. Won't be back until Sunday Oct. 29th. What is the
schedule for the World Series? Is it Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday,
Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday?
Ron
|
63.1517 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 20 1995 13:16 | 3 |
| Yes, you'll be back in time for game 7 if needed.
George
|
63.1518 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Oct 20 1995 13:50 | 6 |
| > terminal. Won't be back until Sunday Oct. 29th. What is the
> schedule for the World Series? Is it Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday,
> Wednesday, Thursday, Saturday, Sunday?
I think the Braves will only need Saturday, Sunday, Tuesday,
Wednesday, with a possible Thursday in case of rain.
|
63.1519 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 20 1995 15:29 | 2 |
63.1520 | Have to like the Indians in 7 | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Oct 20 1995 15:32 | 13 |
| Note that the networks are flipp'n the coverage back and forth.
ABC, 1; nbc,nbc;abc,abc;nbc,abc
Looks like a seven gamer. Don't know if Braves can make the big plays
in the clutch and avoid the big mistakes.
Justice and McGriff are much better hitters than their average
dictates. Indians don't lose as much as some A.L. teams in the past
when playing in n.l. park as Murray if necessary can still play first.
Lofton-Grissom may be decisive - there's none better than Lofton right
now.
|
63.1521 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 20 1995 15:51 | 19 |
| The Indians shouldn't have that much trouble because of no DH. If they go
in Atlanta Hershire, Martinez, Martinez, Nagy
in Cleveland Nagy, Hill, Hershire,
the way they seemed headed in the A.L.C.S. then game 7 will be the only one
where they don't have a pitcher with national league experience on the mound.
A couple reasons the announcers gave for Martinez pitching games 1 and 6
against Seattle was that being older he needed the extra time to rest and
they were afraid his old body would stiffen up in the cold air in Cleveland.
If that's true then the same reasoning could work here except that he has
only the 4 days rest between A.L.C.S. game 6 and W.S. game 2.
Should be an even matchup. This could be a great series unless one of the two
teams gets lucky and runs off a few wins in a row.
George
|
63.1522 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Oct 20 1995 17:19 | 17 |
|
As anyone who (for reasons unknown) went through my POOL picks,
or my often notoriously bad postseason picks, knows, I never pick
against my team, even if I don't think they're going to win.
Therefore, it shouldn't surprise anyone (or at least the anyone
silly enough to analyze my picks) that I predict the Tribe will
win it all.
However, at least on this ocassion, I really mean it. I honestly
believe that Cleveland _will_ win, in (give or take a game) five
games.
And I'm 100% certain I'm going to enjoy this Series, like no other
I've seen before.
Joe
|
63.1523 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 20 1995 18:01 | 14 |
| The one thing that makes me thing the Indians might struggle a bit is the
trouble they had hitting against the Red Sox and Mariners. Neither has what
you would call a great pitching staff but the Indians really didn't have many
8 or 9 run games.
The Braves, by contrast, can pitch and in spite of the fact that Hershiser
and Martinez come from the NL, they will have one less hitter in the lineup.
The Indians will have to hit better than they did during the playoffs to win
but then those guys are capable of cranking it up.
I really believe the Braves have the edge but not by much.
George
|
63.1524 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Oct 20 1995 18:19 | 37 |
|
> The Braves, by contrast, can pitch and in spite of the fact that Hershiser
>and Martinez come from the NL, they will have one less hitter in the lineup.
Yes, they can pitch, but the Tribe has a _far_ superior offense;
subtract 1/9 of Cleveland's offense, and they still (taking park
effects into account) put up 125 more runs.
Using equivalent averages, which normalize to a neutral park...
Belle - .350
Thome - .337
Klesko - .325
Ramirez - .322
Murray - .310
Lofton - .295
Sorrento - .287
Baerga - .286
Justice - .285
Lopez - .285
McGriff - .284
Alomar - .279
Jones - .275
Vizquel - .252
O'Brien - .246
Grissom - .245
Lemke - .237
Blauser - .222
Even _if_ we assume Atlanta's pitching to be far superior (IMHO, a
clearly wrong assumption), there's a _lot_ of difference to be
made up...
Of course, in a short series, anything can happen. But I'm
certain the Tribe has a better chance than the Braves...
Joe
|
63.1525 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Oct 22 1995 11:10 | 5 |
63.1526 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 23 1995 07:17 | 5 |
63.1527 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 23 1995 07:17 | 2 |
63.1528 | | STAR::ALLISON | | Mon Oct 23 1995 07:36 | 5 |
| Keep the faith, Groaner...
Heard a comment last night.. Ever since the Sox had Belle's bat sawn in
half, he's hit something like .200... At least the Sox did something
positive in that series.. ;)
|
63.1529 | tribe will win! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 23 1995 07:50 | 2 |
63.1530 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 23 1995 08:44 | 19 |
| > Heard a comment last night.. Ever since the Sox had Belle's bat sawn in
> half, he's hit something like .200... At least the Sox did something
> positive in that series.. ;)
I heard an interesting comment over the weekend as well. It appears that
of Belle's 50 HR's, only 12 came in the first few months of the season,
while the Tribe was building a 17.5 game lead. 31 came in August and
September, after Cleveland had basically clinched the division title.
Then they pointed out how many chances Belle has had in the post-season
to come through in the crunch, and except for the game-tying HR against
Boston in game 1, Belle has failed rather miserably in post-season RBI
situations. [Case in point was last night, with the foul pop to Lopez
with a runner on third late in the game.]
There was some speculation as to whether Belle performs less well when
the pressure is on. While it may not be true, statistics seem to bear
out that he hits better when there is no pressure.
|
63.1531 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Oct 23 1995 09:22 | 15 |
|
> There was some speculation as to whether Belle performs less well when
> the pressure is on. While it may not be true, statistics seem to bear
> out that he hits better when there is no pressure.
It depends upon how much context you take, though - while Belle
_wasn't_ hitting many HR early in the season, he was hitting a _ton_
of doubles, and was helping the team. He also was a very good
"clutch" hitter in 1994, when the Tribe was truly in a race. I
don't see any concrete evidence over any significant period of
time that Belle is not a "clutch" player.
He certainly hasn't been up to par in the postseason, though...
Joe
|
63.1532 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 23 1995 09:31 | 11 |
| > It depends upon how much context you take, though - while Belle
> _wasn't_ hitting many HR early in the season, he was hitting a _ton_
> of doubles, and was helping the team. He also was a very good
> "clutch" hitter in 1994, when the Tribe was truly in a race. I
> don't see any concrete evidence over any significant period of
> time that Belle is not a "clutch" player.
Well, actually neither what I saw or what you state is evidence that he
is or isn't. Certainly he could end up wearing a Ron Gant-type label
if he continues to fail to come through.
|
63.1533 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 23 1995 10:01 | 30 |
| The Indians have now lost 6 World Series games in a row. Anyone know if they
are coming up on a record?
Must win for Nagy Tuesday. No World Series team has ever come back from down
3 zip and the Indians will have to beat John Smoltz, the Braves best post
season pitcher, to avoid falling into that hole.
Teams have come back recently from being down two zip. This is the list
as I remember it:
As I recall the Yankees came back in '78 and took 4 straight after dropping
the 1st two games to the Dodgers. That was the Series in which Greg Nettels
turned those spectacular game saving plays at 3rd and Reggie hit 3 dingers
in one game. Garvey was in a slump throughout the series.
In '81 (the other big strike year) Garvey was pounding the ball and the
Dodgers returned the favor coming back to take 4 straight after dropping the
1st two in Yankee Stadium.
Then of course there was '86 when the Red Sox blew their 2-zip lead over the
Mets.
In '87 and '91 the Twins blew 2 games to zip leads to go down 2 games to 3
against the Cardinals and Braves but came back to take both series in 7.
By contrast, teams losing the 3rd game to go down 3 zip have not fared as
well. Not only has no team won from that position in World History, it seems
that they almost never avoid the sweep once in that hole.
George
|
63.1534 | Sorry Groan... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Mon Oct 23 1995 10:03 | 4 |
|
Stick a fork in em. They are done!!
|
63.1535 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Mon Oct 23 1995 10:04 | 4 |
|
Last team to blow a 2-0 lead in the WS. 1986 Red Sox. Maybe there
is hope for the tribe.
|
63.1536 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:08 | 4 |
63.1537 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:19 | 4 |
| If Avery pitches Game 4 Maddux will be pitching Game 5 on 4 days rest. In
either case, if they continue to alternate it will be a NL ump.
George
|
63.1538 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:20 | 5 |
| > Tribe will even the series at 2-2. Game 5 will be pivotal. Will the
> home plate umpire be AL or NL for that game?
Will be an NL ump in game 5. But, if Cleveland wins game 3 (certainly
not a certainty), it might very well be Maddux vs Hill in game 4.
|
63.1539 | Cleveland needs to get back to fundamentals, and fast | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:21 | 18 |
|
Omar Vizquel... none better defensively, until the 1995 World Series...
Orel Hershiser... never lost a postseason game, until the 1995 WS...
Albert Belle... no better power/average combination hitter, until
the 1995 WS...
Dennis Martinez... all the advantages of savvy and experience, until
the 1995 WS...
Manny Ramirez... all the advantages of talented, enthusiastic youth,
until the 1995 WS...
glenn
|
63.1540 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:51 | 2 |
63.1541 | Sorry Paul | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:55 | 3 |
|
Don't believe that was a World Series.
|
63.1542 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 23 1995 12:16 | 19 |
| Sure, teams come back from being down 2 zip all the time and the Indians are
certainly capable of doing it if they start playing like the Indians that won
the American League Central during the regular season.
Problem is the Indian hitters have gone cold. Several announcers have pointed
out, and rightly so, that it was the Indian pitching that beat the Red Sox and
the Mariners. Not only are the Indians not hitting, now they are up against the
best starting rotation in baseball.
Which brings up another point. I don't remember much about the Reds Dodgers
series, but since the BoSox were eliminated I don't think there has been a
single blow out. The pitching in general has pretty much kept the hitting
in general under control for most of this post season. True you expect low
scoring games against playoff quality pitching staffs but you'd think there
would be a slugfest once in a while.
We've been seeing some pretty amazing pitching from all these teams.
George
|
63.1543 | Overhead cam shots agree...umps are blind! | BRAT::LEARY | Cardassians,Klingons and Dominion,OH MY! | Tue Oct 24 1995 09:54 | 15 |
| RE: .1536
Who cares which league the plate umpire is from! Somebody
feewing that the Twibe isn't getting the corner calls?
Blaming the umpiring...sounds like you're resorting to
hypocritical thinking once again Groanie.
Hello kettle?! This is Paul. You're black.
Confused? See notes regarding Roger Clemens getting squeezed for
a little enlightenment.
Let's see some scoring tonight!
ML
|
63.1544 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Oct 24 1995 10:16 | 14 |
| > <<< Note 63.1543 by BRAT::LEARY "Cardassians,Klingons and Dominion,OH MY!" >>>
>
> ML
I took a look at the name, and then at the initials, and thought for half a
second....
Then I realized I didn't see a note crowing in the Notre Dame topic, and
thought, nope, it can't be.....
'Saw
|
63.1545 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 24 1995 11:57 | 5 |
63.1546 | | NQOS01::16.135.176.142::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Tue Oct 24 1995 12:14 | 5 |
| You've gotten burned on it enough in the past, that you haven't come right
out and said it, but you have certainly been setting it up. It took a
newcomer to fall for the trap, that everyone else easily avoided.
brews
|
63.1547 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 24 1995 12:24 | 12 |
| Funny, when I looked at that note I felt there was some implication about
the umpiring as well but perhaps not. Let's give Groner the benefit of the
doubt and say:
>RE <<< Note 63.1536 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
>
> Tribe will even the series at 2-2. Game 5 will be pivotal. Will the
> home plate umpire be AL or NL for that game?
If they alternate, NL, if they go by home park AL, but why do you ask?
George
|
63.1548 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 24 1995 13:53 | 3 |
63.1549 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 24 1995 13:53 | 3 |
63.1550 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 24 1995 14:22 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1548 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> "Will the home plate umpire be AL or NL for that game" really means
> the umps are to blame?
I don't know. I'm not making any claim at all as to what it means.
All I said is "why do you ask"? Just curious that's all. Do you have any
insight as to what that would mean if it were NL v. AL? And why did you ask
about game 5 as opposed to game 3 or 4?
George
|
63.1551 | if you don't believe look it up | AD::HEATH | Tribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sports | Tue Oct 24 1995 14:52 | 10 |
|
Paul...
Don't touch that. We can get an expert in here and dust for prints
and maybe get some DNA. Writing "Sox sucks" is still punishable by
being burned at the stake in this state.
Jerry
|
63.1552 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 24 1995 15:03 | 13 |
63.1553 | | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Tue Oct 24 1995 15:16 | 8 |
| >>NOT WANT YOU TO RUSH TO JUDGEMENT BUT...clearly the glove indicates it
>> was either Ron or Karen!"
>> Yes ladies and gentlemen, the perpetrator dropped one of his gloves.
---
Now I'm no F. lee but I think we have a winner
|
63.1554 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 24 1995 15:26 | 2 |
63.1555 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Oct 24 1995 15:45 | 2 |
|
Is it true that the culprit was seen cruising slowly in a Geo Tracker?
|
63.1556 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Oct 24 1995 16:07 | 7 |
| Yunz'll never guess who asked me to post this....
"Has anyone ever seen Albert Bell and Barry Bonds at the
same time?"
billl
|
63.1557 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Oct 24 1995 16:12 | 6 |
| > Yunz'll never guess who asked me to post this....
>
> "Has anyone ever seen Albert Bell and Barry Bonds at the
> same time?"
Was it Fabio?
|
63.1558 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Oct 24 1995 16:20 | 9 |
| >Was it Fabio?
nope, but I'll give you a hint....
=bob= has his baseball card.
billl
|
63.1559 | Noooooo | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Tue Oct 24 1995 16:21 | 3 |
|
Dick Raditz???
|
63.1560 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Oct 24 1995 16:23 | 4 |
| re .1559
WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!
|
63.1561 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 25 1995 00:45 | 5 |
63.1563 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 25 1995 07:31 | 2 |
63.1564 | Is it definitely Avery vs. Hill tonight? | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Wed Oct 25 1995 07:55 | 22 |
| Excellent game to say the least. Do the Braves miss Jeff Blauser or
what? His being out has left a massive hole in the Braves lineup.
I also wonder what Javy Lopez had in mind when Wohlers shook him off
from going out to talk to him before Alomar's at-bat in the 9th.
Smolz sucked. Alejandro Pena sucked. Nagy pitched well until he tired.
Lofton is once again the Cleveland MVP.
"Good aggressive baserunning" got Grissom picked off second/third for the
3rd out in the 6th inning or so. A good throw by Grissom could very
well have cut down that run at the plate in the 11th as well. This guy
is supposed to be one of the top center fielders in the game? He
almost screwed himself into the ground on another medium-deep fly to
left center that I don't remember who hit. He eventually caught it but
looked lost in doing so.
Lemke came about 2 feet from winning the game with a line shot off Mesa
in the 9th.
For the most part, I'd say Cleveland deserved that win.
Steve
|
63.1565 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Wed Oct 25 1995 08:48 | 3 |
| > Do deer kill people?
Yeah, if they don't look out while they're driving...
|
63.1566 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 25 1995 10:15 | 72 |
| > 3rd out in the 6th inning or so. A good throw by Grissom could very
> well have cut down that run at the plate in the 11th as well. This guy
> is supposed to be one of the top center fielders in the game?
The problem with Grissom's plays in the 11th had nothing to do with
Grissom himself (IMO) but with his positioning. Look at the replay and
you will notice that on both Baerga's double and Murray's single, he was
positioned well to the left side of center field, and the expectation
was that Pena should be pitching away to induce fly balls into those
areas. The pitch to Baerga was down and over the plate, and the pitch
to Murray was up and in. Both were pulled. I daresay that had Murray's
hit been over the shortstop's head, Grissom would have had Espinosa at
home; he does have a good arm, and Espinosa doesn't appear to be any
speedster.
From a Braves' fan standpoint:
The bad from last night:
Braves lost a game they led 6-5 in the eighth, a game which could have
just about clinched the Series for them. It doesn't get any worse than
that.
Smoltz. He was terrible from the start, and unfortunately we have him to
look forward to as the starter in game 7, if the Series goes the distance.
More than any other pitcher on the Braves staff, he can come unglued.
Even worse, he was largely responsible for waking up the Cleveland bats
that had been dormant in this series.
Pena. While he wasn't walking people (did intentionally walk Belle),
his control wasn't sharp. Neither the 1-2 or 2-2 curves to Baerga were
close enough to tempt, and his location on the hits by Baerga and Murray
was bad enough that the Braves were out of position.
Walks. After the Braves closed to 4-3, Mercker allowed a leadoff walk
in the 7th, which runner scored to make it 5-3. After the Braves took a
6-5 lead, McMichael walks the leadoff runner in the 8th, and that runner
scores to tie the game. Why pitch around guys when no one is on base ?
Make them put the ball in play.
Wohlers had to pitch 2 2/3 innings last night, and probably is not going
to be available for 1, maybe 2 games.
The good from last night:
The Braves bullpen generally did a good job. Forgetting Pena's terrible
performance, the rest of the bull pen allowed 2 runs on 4 or 5 hits in
7 2/3 innings, against arguably the best offensive team in the A.L. Save
for two costly walks leading off innings, they could have goose-egged the
Indians. The bullpen was a major factor the Braves got back into the
game.
Braves continue to perform well offensively in the late innings, and
don't seem at all fazed by W.S. pressure, nor by the supposedly best
bullpen in baseball. Assenmacher was not sharp, Tavarez gave up an
RBI single out of two batters, and while Mesa was tough in three scoreless
innings, the Braves got some good swings off him from their left handed
bats. Lemke got two hits off him, including one that was two feet from a
game-winning HR in the ninth. McGriff got a hit, Polonia hung in tough
against Mesa's best pitches (eventually earning a walk after being down
0-2 in the count), and Jones hit a shot that Perry turned into an
inning ender (I also doubt Sorrento makes that play). We don't Devereaux
batting against him, however. Atlanta bats seem to be doing quite well
against "baseball's best bullpen."
Mesa had to work three innings last night to keep Cleveland in the series.
He certainly won't be available to pitch both of the next two nights.
Apparently, Bobby Cox has it all over Mike Hargrove in the managing
department. I bet Hargrove will cost the Indians this series if he makes
decisions like the Nagy decision last night.
|
63.1567 | Cox may make biggest blunder of all with Maddux, though | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | What's the story morning glory? | Wed Oct 25 1995 11:10 | 32 |
|
> Smoltz. He was terrible from the start, and unfortunately we have him to
> look forward to as the starter in game 7, if the Series goes the distance.
I can't believe that Maddux is not going tonight. Is there any
controversy over this in Atlanta? Is there some specific rationale
beyond the "don't mess with success" party line? Didn't Maddux go
on 3 in the LDS? Why not now?
> Pena. While he wasn't walking people (did intentionally walk Belle),
> his control wasn't sharp. Neither the 1-2 or 2-2 curves to Baerga were
> close enough to tempt, and his location on the hits by Baerga and Murray
> was bad enough that the Braves were out of position.
Alejandro Pena was horrible in about a half-dozen innings this year
with the Red Sox, then recently BLAMMED it on "misuse". From the
point I heard that, I figured the guy was still the walking time
bomb he's most always been.
As you more or less said, the Indians still seem to be having problems
executing _consistently_ (they dodged a huge bullet with that DP to
keep it at 6-5 after the Baerga error-- was that the same inning or
am I confused?) and with Hargrove's handling of pitching (I think some
of those earlier criticisms like not making the pitchout in Game 1
were nit-picking, but last night was a disaster). It was a huge win
for the Indians, but a game that for a while looked like they were
determined to give away. Fortunately, we've still got a Series.
glenn
|
63.1568 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 25 1995 11:16 | 7 |
| Cox said he was going to decide about Maddux Monday when Maddux worked.
Maybe they didn't like something they saw.
Seems Maddux did pitch in 3 days rest against Colorado, but didn't they
get to him at one point for some runs?
George
|
63.1569 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 25 1995 11:37 | 4 |
63.1570 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 25 1995 11:38 | 6 |
63.1571 | I fell asleep in 10th | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Oct 25 1995 11:54 | 24 |
| Well I was in favor of Avery pitching game 4 all along and even more so
since Smoltz was ineffective. I expect Avery to pitch well and be the
choice for game 7. Of course if he does pitch well there probably
won't be a game 7. Then again I'm not so sure of Maddox and Glavine at
the Jake.
Pena had some good outings with the Redsox then some bad and he was
gone quick, DD was pretty testy early on. The guy is just inconsistent.
The hit that knocked Nagy out was a routine ground ball that found a
slit in the right side of the infield (off the bat of the much maligned
Polonia btw). I do agree that letting Assenmacher start the inning
would have been better since he always seems to walk the first batter
he faces. Hargrove seemed to be avoiding Devereaux and wanting to
pitch to Polonia with his righty.
Ironically the arm chair fan when objective often makes better choices
than the field general who is too into details like "how's his stuff?,
what was the jugs read on that last fastball...).
Cleveland has to find a way to survive in a low scoring game tonight
(for 6-7 innings) with the burned out pens deciding the outcome later.
Oh, the dp followed the Baerga error.
|
63.1572 | GREAT GAME!! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Oct 25 1995 13:08 | 9 |
|
THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME!!
THE CHIEF,
WAHOOOOO!
|
63.1573 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Oct 25 1995 13:18 | 8 |
| What a shock...
Indians win...Hal returns...is this just some
mysterious co-inky-dink? I think not.
billl
|
63.1574 | another extra inning win! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Oct 25 1995 13:28 | 27 |
|
Sorry Bill, I've just been very busy....hehehehehe....driving back
and forth to Cleveland...that is. Lets see, I was at game 1 of the
division series in Cleveland. Then got tickets for game 1 of the ALCS
which was a good game but not as good at the game 1 of the division
series. Couldn't get tickets to the World Series though.
Never been to better, more excieting games in my life. Wish I
could have been there last night for that one! To me, the games in
Atlanta just wasn't very excieting at all. The fans there just didn't
seem to be into the game. Now, back in Cleveland.....ITS THE WORLD
SERIES!!
YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE!!!!
When I got depressed after game 2 in Atlanta, all I had to do was
put in the video......WAHOO, WHAT A FINISH! and everything was just
fine.
Not worried about the Browns yet....injuries are killing them right
now.
Go Tribe!!
WAHOOOOO!
|
63.1575 | Stiff confesses | SALEM::DODA | The halfway house that Ruth built | Wed Oct 25 1995 14:25 | 9 |
| In case anyone missed it, Jason Grimsley admitted last week that
he was the person that broke into the umpires room in Chicago
and stole Belle's corked bat. He crawled through some heating duct
to get in there. He said he had to substitute Sorrent's bat
because, "Belle didn't own a bat that wasn't corked."
Fyi, and all that.
daryll
|
63.1576 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 25 1995 23:38 | 2 |
63.1577 | Maddox will get lit up 2night | AD::HEATH | Tribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sports | Thu Oct 26 1995 06:41 | 6 |
|
All last night meant was Avery will pitch game 7.
Jerry
|
63.1578 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:01 | 13 |
| Very wishful thinking I'd say. Cleveland can't hit the soft serve
stuff that Maddux will dazzle 'em with tonight. They've actually
proven this series that they can't hit much of anything when facing
baseball's top pitching staff. What'd they have, 4 hits last night?
The struttin' and trash talking will soon come to an end (or has it
already?) and when it's finally over, the Indians will be grouped with
the Rangers, Royals, Blue Jays, Mets and yes, the Red Sox as having
put up meaningless numbers, because they didn't win it all according to
Paul Gronowski. Isn't that right Paul? ;-)
Steve
|
63.1579 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:15 | 5 |
63.1581 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:28 | 6 |
| I hate to say it because I was rooting for the Tribe, but...
"Stick a fork in 'em..."
There are more enviable tasks than being down 1-3 and facing a rested
Greg Maddux in your next game.
|
63.1582 | its not over yet! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:29 | 3 |
63.1583 | Ah never mind | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:34 | 7 |
| >>Who's crying... Indians fans are still watching baseball, Boston fans
>>have resorted to viewing big time wrestling and hockey.
Hey we can watch the Celtics too! :^) And boy do they suck.
Mike
|
63.1584 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:36 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1582 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
> Who's crying... Indians fans are still watching baseball, Boston fans
> have resorted to viewing big time wrestling and hockey.
No, the real Boston fans are watching their Braves try to get even for the
beating they took back in 1948.
Over all the Braves and Indians are now 5-5 in World Series play.
GO BRAVES!!!!
George
|
63.1585 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:37 | 5 |
|
Well, I'm not giving up hope. Last night's game was disappointing,
but if any team has a chance to come back, it's the Tribe.
Joe
|
63.1586 | Just a matter of time know!!! | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:39 | 15 |
|
Great game last night....Avery looked very sharp, Hill was lucky, he
could have easily been blown out of the game by the 5th inning but
Justice could come up with the clutch hit. But, he did however get the
game winner in the seventh, and a spectacular catch to end the game and
the indians dream of a comeback......Pedro Bourbon jr looked great
lastnight, coming in in the ninth up by 3 with a man on 2nd. Thome
watchs strike 3 go right by him, Alomar fans for the 2nd out and Lofton
hits a drive to right in which justice made a great over the shoulder
catch..........Oh ya..Belle hit a HR in the 7th, he also made a
pathetic play trying to get a bloop hit...he had not chance too catch
it but as he came in on it he went into a slide and went slide right
past it.......some MVP.
john
|
63.1587 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:56 | 9 |
| Well, my Dad's happy.
He's the only person I know who actually has been to Braves Field in Boston to
see the Braves play, and of course caught the All-Star game there too.
He doesn't like the Indians (and he doesn't even know Paul or Hal!) and he's
kind of charged up about this recent turn of events.
I'm rooting for the Braves because of my Dad I guess....
|
63.1588 | They were in trouble all night... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Oct 26 1995 09:28 | 12 |
|
As far as Belle's try at the pop behind third...I think you are way
out of line by saying that. Albert ran his butt off trying to get to
the ball. I was really surprised he made the play that close. I will
give Albert some credit in the game last night. He was really
husseling on all plays. Then he hits the HR to the right field on an
outside pitch.
Worst part of the game...was when Travariz threw that 1-2 pitch
right down the middle of the plate to Justice. game over...
Doesn't look good for the Tribe but I know they can come back.
WAHOOOOO!
|
63.1589 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Thu Oct 26 1995 09:38 | 4 |
| I think you've got your righties and lefties mixed up, Hal. It wasn't
Tavarez, it was Assenmacher that Justice drilled back up the middle.
Steve
|
63.1590 | goodbye 50 goodbye 50 goodbye 50 boo hoo | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Oct 26 1995 09:55 | 1 |
|
|
63.1591 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Thu Oct 26 1995 09:57 | 12 |
| > Tavarez,
The man with a face only a mother could love....
>it was Assenmacher
This guy reminds me of that Russian guy who plays the Russian immigrant in all
the TV shows. Can't remember his name -- it might be Yakov Smirnov but I'm not
sure....
|
63.1592 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Thu Oct 26 1995 10:11 | 6 |
| > As far as Belle's try at the pop behind third...I think you are way
> out of line by saying that.
Fancy this coming from the same guy who thought it was out of line to check
the bat of a guy who has been caught corking his bat before. Hal, you make
Groaner look like an ObjectiveAnalyst...
|
63.1593 | fresh off the press | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Thu Oct 26 1995 10:17 | 11 |
| "Anything short of a WS win by the Indians would
HAVE to be considered one of the biggest chokes in
history!"
"The small package that arrived at Jacobs Field before
yesterday's game was opened and found to contain the
bronzed chicken bone that had been removed from Berice's
throat when he was cut by the Brown(spot)s(tm)."
"JaKe"
|
63.1594 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Oct 26 1995 10:18 | 15 |
| I haven't watched much of this series (I fall into the "general public"
category with MLB if the Yanks aren't involved), but from what little
I've seen tells me that Cle hitters _DON'T_ in the clutch. Their BA
is pathetic overall, but they might as well pass when it comes to
runners-in-scoring-position-late-in-the-game.
Seattle's lineup (with Griffey, Edgar and Buhner) puts more late-game
fear in the opposition than this Cle lineup (during this post-season).
Sorry Groaner, you had a nice season, but it's over. Like I said before
it began: Atlanta in 5 or 6.
And one more thing: Let's never again hear any reference to the '61 or
'27 Yankees when talking about this Cleveland team (for obvious reasons).
|
63.1595 | No baseball this weekend? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | What's the story morning glory? | Thu Oct 26 1995 10:29 | 29 |
|
> And one more thing: Let's never again hear any reference to the '61 or
> '27 Yankees when talking about this Cleveland team (for obvious reasons).
Yeah, let's make it the 1960 Yankees.
I must offer my sincerest apologies to Bobby Cox and his mentor
Bill Breen for my criticisms of the decision to start Steve Avery
last night. That worked out in a big way. I now have a strong
feeling that Greg Maddux is going to do something (unusually)
historic tonight, like maybe throw a no-hitter, or at least a
shutout to pull down the MVP honors.
We're not seeing too much of Paul Assenmacher's wife anymore.
I think the most overrated part of this Indians' team is their
bullpen: not including Mesa, there are some real stiffs out
there who had career or unexpectedly above-average seasons, but
have turned back into pumpkins...
I too still am pulling for the Tribe but Paul's groaning does make
this somewhat palatable. I feel for you though, Joe H, and in a
weaker moment maybe even Hal... ;-) 'Course a ground ball hasn't
gone through anybody's legs yet or anything like that (we made it
all the way through yesterday, October 25, without anyone making
mention of The Anniversary-- there is an upside to no longer having
TCM around after all).
glenn
|
63.1596 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Thu Oct 26 1995 10:32 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1594 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>I haven't watched much of this series (I fall into the "general public"
>category with MLB if the Yanks aren't involved), but from what little
>I've seen tells me that Cle hitters _DON'T_ in the clutch.
I don't agree. As Joe Morgan said, those stats are averages and teams
fluxuate from week to week. The Indians are great hitters but they are up
against great pitchers so they don't look nearly as good. They were hitting
Glavine pretty hard in game 2 but they were hitting right at people. With a
little different luck in that game this series would be all tied up at 2 each.
Also, plenty of teams have come back from being down 3-1. In fact this team,
the Braves, blew the 3-1 lead against the Yankees back in '57.
The Braves have the edge, no doubt about it but it's a thin edge. If the
Indians win tonight I'd have to say the edge goes back to them in game 6.
George
|
63.1597 | | STRATA::GARRY | | Thu Oct 26 1995 11:24 | 13 |
| re.1596 sleepr::maiewski
I disagree with your statement that this same team the 57 braves blew
it.
Hell the people on the 95 braves weren't even born yet.......
I am a fan of neither team but past history means ZILCH.
This Braves team has much better pitching and as the old adage goes
good pitching will beat good hitting 95% of the time.
Tom
|
63.1598 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Oct 26 1995 11:26 | 4 |
63.1599 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Thu Oct 26 1995 12:02 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1597 by STRATA::GARRY >>>
> I disagree with your statement that this same team the 57 braves blew
> it.
>
> Hell the people on the 95 braves weren't even born yet.......
Sorry for the confusion, I'm using the word "team" there to mean franchise.
It's like when the announcers constantly say "Indians fans are worried
because their team got swept in '54, now they are losing again". Obviously
the '54 Indian team has nothing to do with the '95 Indian team but most
people who follow baseball know that when you say "This team 30-40 years ago"
that is an idiom for "this franchise 30-40 years ago".
To say that properly, this Braves franchise blew a 3-1 World Series lead
to the Yankees back in 1958 so Braves fans are a bit nervous hoping it
doesn't happen again to this franchise.
George
|
63.1600 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 26 1995 12:13 | 13 |
| > To say that properly, this Braves franchise blew a 3-1 World Series lead
> to the Yankees back in 1958 so Braves fans are a bit nervous hoping it
> doesn't happen again to this franchise.
>
> George
Except for one thing, George. Your selection of the work "so" implies cause
and effect, and that isn't the case here. Braves fans are not nervous because
the Milwaukee Braves blew a 3-1 lead in the 1958 World Series; perhaps most
are not even aware of this fact. What people are aware of is the fact that
the team with arguably the best rotation in each of the last 5 years has
failed to win even one title. That makes people nervous.
|
63.1601 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Thu Oct 26 1995 13:12 | 11 |
| Well yes and no, Maddux has not been on the Braves all that much time. Those
earlier attempts were with Glavine, Smoltz, Avery, Charlie Leibrandt. I've got
to believe they are stronger now with Maddux.
Also I don't recall them having anyone down 3 games to 1 during that time.
In 1958 the Braves had the Yankees down 3 games to 1 with Lew Berdette and
Warren Spahn ready to go which is not much different than what you've got
now considering how well Berdette had pitched against the Yankees in 1957 and
and game 1 in 1958.
George
|
63.1602 | "get real" | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Oct 26 1995 13:27 | 13 |
| > Well yes and no, Maddux has not been on the Braves all that much time. Those
>earlier attempts were with Glavine, Smoltz, Avery, Charlie Leibrandt. I've got
>to believe they are stronger now with Maddux.
Didn't the Braves lose the NLCS in Maddux' 1st year ?
re: George's "slim edge to Atlanta"
The old adage, "anything can happen", and Yogi's "it ain't over 'til it's
over" apply to a very small percentage of situations. I think Atlanta
has a HUGE edge with 4-time Cy Young-er Maddux going tonight, and if
needed, the last 2 games in Atlanta.
|
63.1603 | If Avery, Braves in 7 else Indians take 7th | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Oct 26 1995 13:41 | 19 |
| Frank Way, quit next-unseening'n my notes.
For the third or fourth time, I attended a Braves game in 1952 at old
Braves field. My main thought at the time was "for this I missed going
to Fenway?"
Jerry Heath is right. Maddox is still vulnerable tonight and Glavine
too back in Atlanta. The ultimate choice for Cox will be whether to
start Smoltz or Avery in game 7. We now see that using Avery was never
a sentimental gesture but the professional move of a hard-bitten
baseball manager who knew he needed the lefthander and may well need
him again.
I don't think this Indians team will quit and I think Maddox is still
very good but not dominating. After tonight it's two more southpaws
and Hargrove better just live or die with Thome. He might also think
of starting Tony Pena a game early.
Billte
|
63.1604 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Thu Oct 26 1995 13:50 | 22 |
| Re <<< Note 63.1602 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>Didn't the Braves lose the NLCS in Maddux' 1st year ?
What's your point? We're talking about the World Series here and a situation
where the Braves are up 3 games to 1 with Maddux going tonight. In that series
the Brave never had that kind of edge, they lost to the Phillies in 6.
>The old adage, "anything can happen", and Yogi's "it ain't over 'til it's
>over" apply to a very small percentage of situations. I think Atlanta
>has a HUGE edge with 4-time Cy Young-er Maddux going tonight, and if
>needed, the last 2 games in Atlanta.
Yes but he's going against another Cy Young-er who holds the current record
for consecutive scoreless innings. And the way Hershirser has been playing
lately the edge is not all that Huge.
One 19-2 Cy Young-er playing about the same as he's played all year going
against another 16-2 Cy Young-er with a stronger offense playing better than he
played most of the year sounds like a fairly even match up to me. Edge Braves.
George
|
63.1605 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 26 1995 14:14 | 15 |
| > One 19-2 Cy Young-er playing about the same as he's played all year going
>against another 16-2 Cy Young-er with a stronger offense playing better than he
>played most of the year sounds like a fairly even match up to me. Edge Braves.
16-2 ? Excuse me ? Was this 16-6 pitcher ever once mentioned all year
as a Cy Young candidate ? What's the difference in their ERA's ? Oh, well
over a run a game (close to two runs a game), is it ? Hmm...
Stronger offense ? You mean the offense hitting in approximately .190 in the
World Series ? You mean the offense being out homered in this series ? Hmm...
Atlanta has a HUGE edge. Hershiser may be equal to the task, no question --
but this is not a molehill the Indians have to surmount, make no mistake
about it. Their best hope is a line drive off Maddox's leg (just as against
Philadelphia two years ago).
|
63.1606 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Oct 26 1995 14:23 | 8 |
|
didn't Maddux come into the Series with the Highest ERA of any of the
pitchers in post season play? Didn't the Rockies rough him up a bit.
Indians aren't out of this one yet.
I also agree with Billte, if this one goes to 7, Cox is crazy not to
pitch Avery who has always pitched circles around Smoltz in the post
season..........
|
63.1607 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Thu Oct 26 1995 14:47 | 33 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1605 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
> 16-2 ? Excuse me ? Was this 16-6 pitcher ever once mentioned all year
> as a Cy Young candidate ?
No, of course not. But as Hershiser once said, in this game the only thing
anyone is interested in was "what have you done for me lately". And lately
Hershiser has been pitching much better than he did during the year when he
racked up most of those 16 wins.
> Stronger offense ? You mean the offense hitting in approximately .190 in the
> World Series ? You mean the offense being out homered in this series ? Hmm...
During the 1958 Series the Yankees couldn't touch Lew Berdette in game 1
just like they couldn't touch him in 3 games in 1957. Using the exact same
logic you are giving above, which seems to be "if a strong team can't hit a guy
they will never be able to hit a guy", what happened in game 5 didn't happen,
but it did. Moose Skowran suddenly figured out what Berdette was all about and
the pummeling began.
> Atlanta has a HUGE edge.
There's no such thing in baseball as a HUGE edge when you have two teams of
this quality. If their edge was so huge, why was game 1 so close? Why has every
game been so close?
From what you say these games should have been very one sided.
At any rate, you feel confident if you want, I'm nervous and will be until
the final out and it's because I've seen teams come back from being down 3-1
just like what happened to the Braves in '58.
George
|
63.1608 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Thu Oct 26 1995 14:49 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1606 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Washing Machine" >>>
> didn't Maddux come into the Series with the Highest ERA of any of the
> pitchers in post season play? Didn't the Rockies rough him up a bit.
> Indians aren't out of this one yet.
Agreed.
> I also agree with Billte, if this one goes to 7, Cox is crazy not to
> pitch Avery who has always pitched circles around Smoltz in the post
> season..........
Disagreed. In '91 and '92 Smoltz and Avery both did rather well, Glavine and
Lebrandt had problems.
George
|
63.1609 | Cuyahoga River will be overflowing tonight... | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Thu Oct 26 1995 15:25 | 14 |
| Well, Billte, you can't get much more dominant than someone like Maddux
is these days. His ERA the past 4 years dwarfs anyone else's in the
NL. It's not even close. I don't even think it's a longshot to say
that this guy could be the most dominant pitcher I'll get to see in my
lifetime. So, I'm going to just sit back and enjoy every minute of
tonight's game.
I think the key to success for Cleveland's pitching staff prior to this
series was that they could get batters to hack at balls out of the
strike zone. For the most part, Atlanta's batting order has been much
more patient, and there's no reason to believe that they're going to
suddenly become impatient at this point. The series is over tonight.
Steve
|
63.1610 | We'll see; I'm feeling like Indians will find a way | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Oct 26 1995 15:32 | 7 |
| Agreed the results show dominance in the National league regular season
over the last several years. A good but not great playoff pitcher. An
excellent performance in game 1.
Dominance in my mind is Koufax or Gibson or perhaps the 1988/89
Hershiser. He certainly has the chance to move into the exclusive club
of World Series dominating pitchers tonight.
|
63.1611 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 26 1995 17:26 | 18 |
| > over the last several years. A good but not great playoff pitcher. An
> excellent performance in game 1.
He had one terrible outing with the Cubs, allowing 11 runs in one game
against the Giants. Against Philly, he was outstanding in winng his
first appearance of the series, then lost game 6 after getting hit on
the leg with a line drive. He gave up 3 runs against Colorado at
Coors Field, 3 more against them in Fulton County Stadium. While he
wasn't outstanding against Colorado, he pitched fairly well.
One note on a member of the Braves' staff who isn't mentioned too often:
Leo Mazzone. He is one of the best pitching coaches in baseball.
Tom Glavine has given a lot of credit to Leo for transforming him from
1990's 9-16 (9-17?) record, to a Cy Young award candidate yearly.
After his two so-so performances against Colorado in the DS, Leo went
to Greg Maddux and pointed out a slight flaw in his mechanics. Maddux
has since corrected it, and had two outstanding games against Cincinnati
and Cleveland.
|
63.1612 | Atlanta/Boston - born choke artists - see you monday! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 26 1995 22:52 | 7 |
63.1613 | | MIMS::MITCHAM_A | -Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta) | Fri Oct 27 1995 07:35 | 13 |
| >i'm going to use the same logic to say Greg Maddux is no Cy Young
>pitcher. He goes 19-2 against the NL and goes 1-1 against the
>Indians. One word - MEDIOCRE!
I'd put our "mediocre" Greg Maddux against any of your little indian
pitchers any day!
> -< Atlanta/Boston - born choke artists - see you monday! >-
Yeah, let's see what you have to say Monday (not that I don't know
already <barf!>)
-Andy
|
63.1614 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Fri Oct 27 1995 08:13 | 21 |
| Well so much for the HUGE edge that the untouchable Maddux had over the
anemic .180 hitting creampuffs in the Indian's linup.
Albert Bell is coming out of his slumber and becoming ... becoming ... well
he's becoming Albert Bell and last night the Indians hitters looked more like
they did all year than they have for the past couple weeks. This series is as
close as it can be after 5 games and once again the Braves find themselves with
a slight edge being up 3-2.
These teams are about as evenly matched as any two teams that have made it to
the fall classic. This is one awsome World Series.
I like the Braves chances in game 6 but again they only have a slight edge.
Glavine should improve and the Braves should be able to hit Martinez but with
the Indians hitters coming alive Glavine will have his hands full.
It may well come down to Smoltz v. Nagy in game 7. If it does, I hope Smoltz
brings his stuff to the ballpark.
GO BRAVES!!!
George
|
63.1615 | | NQOS01::16.135.176.215::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Fri Oct 27 1995 10:08 | 1 |
| I think they need to check Albert's bat again. 8^)
|
63.1616 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 27 1995 10:36 | 15 |
63.1617 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Fri Oct 27 1995 10:48 | 9 |
| Well I wouldn't say the Braves had no chance in game 7, if Smoltz's slider
starts to work he'll be a whole new pitcher. And he's not tired, Nagy should
be feeling his start just a bit.
But the Braves did have the Indians down on the mat and let'em get back up on
one knee. If they let them off the hook completely in game 6 then we'll have
no fingernails left at all.
George
|
63.1618 | Nice phone message JERKules(tm)! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 27 1995 13:46 | 8 |
63.1619 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Oct 28 1995 22:32 | 5 |
63.1620 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Cleve.Magic # Still 1948 | Sat Oct 28 1995 23:46 | 2 |
| Great game by Tom Glavine. Has their ever been a better pitched game
in a World Series clincher ?
|
63.1621 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Sun Oct 29 1995 00:01 | 3 |
| 1957, Lew Burdette for the Braves shut out the Yankees in game 7.
George
|
63.1622 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Sun Oct 29 1995 19:49 | 22 |
|
Jack Morris, '91 was in the same class...
I still think, given 1000 games, the Tribe would win 550-600.
But that simply doesn't matter, because in the games that
were played and did matter, the Braves won 4 of 6. That's
quite an accomplishment, and they deserve all the credit they
will get for it. The Tribe didn't _lose_ this Series; they put
up a noble effort. The Braves simply _won_ it, with excellent
pitching and just enough hitting against tough Tribe pitchers.
While I can't say I was happy with the final result, I can say
that I enjoyed watching the series tremendously, and am proud
of the job the Tribe did. Just as the Braves deserve credit
for defeating the Indians, the Indians deserve credit for putting
up a good fight against the Braves.
Congrats to the Braves fans, and enjoy - I wouldn't be at all surprised
if the Tribe has a chance at revenge next year...
Joe
|
63.1623 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Boston Braves, 1914 Champs | Mon Oct 30 1995 09:13 | 14 |
| Game 2 was probably what did the Indians in. There's an old saying that you
should win at home and split on the road and the Tribe did win at home
including a tough win against the best pitcher in baseball but in Game 2 with
Glavine off his game they failed to capitalize and that came back to haunt
them.
Also, luck was against the Tribe. I can't think how many times in this series
players from both teams hit the ball hard with runners on base but hit it right
at someone.
Great season for the Tribe, a great showing in the World Series, and a
pennant well deserved. They'll be back next year.
George
|
63.1624 | Great Series | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Mon Oct 30 1995 09:31 | 6 |
| Well both teams deserve credit. 5 one run games in a 6 game series must
be close to a record. The ending of the season was a hell of a lot
better then the end. Maybe both sides will wake up and realize how
great this game is and come to an agreement for the next 5-7 years.
Mike
|
63.1625 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 30 1995 09:31 | 5 |
63.1626 | Game 3, Braves led 6-5 in 8th | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Mon Oct 30 1995 09:37 | 5 |
| Game 3 *WAS* the key game in the series... it kept Cleveland
from being swept, and allowed Cleveland fans to think they are
still a better team than Atlanta. If they played 162 games
against each other, the Braves would end up with a winning record,
the Indians a losing record (just because of that pitching).
|
63.1627 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Mon Oct 30 1995 08:47 | 9 |
| > Great game by Tom Glavine. Has their ever been a better pitched game
> in a World Series clincher ?
I don't think so. A one-hitter, with the only three walks given out to the
guys that could hurt you most.
Best part about it was that it was pitching, not throwing. Glavine had good
stuff, but (at least from watching on TV) it didn't seem eye-popping. The
Braves had an *excellent* scouting report for this series...
|
63.1628 | Congrats 1995 AL Champs! | BRAT::LEARY | Indians'95-Biggest choke in MLB history | Mon Oct 30 1995 09:43 | 17 |
| Congratulations to both clubs for outstanding seasons and all the
tremendous personal performances : regular and post-seasonal.
Other than having to listen to Costas whine, it was a tremendously
entertaining series. Great pitching/scouting beat the best bats
in baseball. Although according to Bobby Cox the Reds were as loaded
with bats as the Tribe?
Watch out for recurring rematches in the next few years. The Braves
have now wonthe big one in 3 different cities. Boston, Milwaukee
and Atlanta.
Note for next years postseason games in Jacobs Field:
Ditch Chrissie Hynde...
Billerica MA home of the World Series MVP.
|
63.1629 | Congrats to Braves | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Oct 30 1995 10:08 | 13 |
| Sandy Koufax had a big game 7 in 1965 vs Minnesota and Johnny Podres
2-0 shutout of the Yankees in 1955 is one of the great ones since it
was Brooklyn's first and the first Yankee world series defeat since the
30s.
Lolich in 1968 and that Pirate pitcher in 1971 over the O's (?). Ah,
Blass, didn't do much after that.
Would Braves have won it with Blauser and not Belliard? The latter
seems to give the pitchers a lot of confidence at ss.
DH factor? Seems to be a problem for the A.L. Maybe more
psychological.
|
63.1630 | There is always next year... | SNAX::ERICKSON | Tom Glavine '95 WS MVP | Mon Oct 30 1995 10:31 | 21 |
|
I believe about 200 replys ago. I stated that I wouldn't be here
last week. For the record, I have not put anything in Pauls office. Or
called and left Paul a voice mail.
I only got to see parts of the games. All I can say is what a
great series. Five out of six games decided by 1 run. You can't want
anything more. Can't remember if it was Bobby Cox, or Mike Hargrove.
Who gave that flip of the coin phrase. That just about sums it up.
Either team could have won this series. I think Atlanta's WS experience
was the difference. Atlanta seemed a little more relaxed at the plate.
While the Indians were pressing a little bit.
As for next year, I wouldn't be surprised to see Cleveland return
to the WS. They have a good young team. Another starting pitcher
should put them over the top. Reason I say another starter. Is because
Martinez is 40/41, and Hershisher is 38/39 years old. As great as they
pitched in this years playoffs. You can't realisticly expect two
40 year old pitchers. To be your #1 and #2 starters in the playoffs.
Ron
|
63.1631 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Oct 30 1995 16:05 | 19 |
| >>Didn't the Braves lose the NLCS in Maddux' 1st year ?
> What's your point?
You said the Braves' earlier attempts to win it all were without Maddux,
which isn't true. He's been there 3 years.
>>I think Atlanta
>>has a HUGE edge with 4-time Cy Young-er Maddux going tonight, and if
>>needed, the last 2 games in Atlanta.
> Yes but he's going against another Cy Young-er
> ....the edge is not all that Huge.
George, you're the king of taking things out of context, or misreading
things. I said the Braves had a HUGE edge in the Series up 3-1 with Maddux
on the hill in Game 5, and Games 6 & 7 in Atlanta (if needed). The
combination of the 3 gave Atlanta a HUGE edge.
|
63.1632 | another country heard from... | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Oct 31 1995 09:46 | 15 |
| And now for your listening pleasure the Hallelujah Chorus from Handel's
Messiah. A pity that Cleveland still has not championship (yeah, right
soccer, hah!) in many many many moons.
Best part for all you DEC loonies is that Groaner and Hal won't be
totally insufferable for the next year or so. Actually the real
fascinating part is how long it will take them to show up and eat CROW;
and I mean real honest to goodness CROW! not like the mush that Brydie
and company eat :-)
Sorry I won't be able to make it on the 17th. bummer!
The Crazy Met
|
63.1633 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Oct 31 1995 13:17 | 5 |
|
So if your team has the highest winning percentage since
Bill Breen was in grade school and they end up losing to
the Buffalo Bills of baseball, what does that make them?
Baseball's answer to Peter McNeeley?
|
63.1634 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Tue Oct 31 1995 13:25 | 29 |
| Saw this on the internet as "Top 10 Cleveland Indians Excuses"
Not sure if this was from Letterman, although I think not. In any case,
I enjoyed #7 the best:
10. Thought it was best of *17* -- planned on a stunning 7-game comeback win.
9. Too worried about budget crisis to concentrate on game.
8. A very lucrative offer from Pete Rose.
7. Hard-of-hearing equipment manager filled bats with *pork*.
6. Afraid winners would be kissed by Jane Fonda.
5. Team really tired from trying to talk Sinead O'Connor into singing
national anthem.
4. Braves shouted "swing" when we got bad pitches.
3. Too tired from shouting match with Hannah Storm.
2. At the last minute, Belle wanted his soul back.
1. Too busy choreographing nude locker room dance number for female reporters.
--
David Schmitt
Kellogg Graduate School of Management '96
|
63.1635 | Re: 63.1634 | MIMS::MITCHAM_A | -Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta) | Wed Nov 01 1995 07:33 | 5 |
| I *love* it. Just one thing: Leave out the <FF> between lines next time.
You don't see 'em with the DECwindows Notes interface, and it wastes alot
of paper when you print it...
-Andy
|
63.1636 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 07:50 | 7 |
63.1637 | Using Paul's logic... | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Wed Nov 01 1995 07:58 | 12 |
| Groaner, I thought it didn't matter what happened 5, 10 or 20 years
ago? That's what you always told Celtics fans when they'd bring up the
fact that they are the most successful basketball franchise in history.
What matters is now, and the facts are that the Indians were no more
successful than the Red Sox or any other team outside of the Atlanta
Braves, for that matter. Not only didn't the Indians win the
championship, but the CHOKED in not doing so!!
Your lame barbs at the Red Sox hold no water.
Steve
|
63.1638 | | MIMS::MITCHAM_A | -Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta) | Wed Nov 01 1995 08:00 | 8 |
| > I thought the "Top 10 Reasons why the Red Sox Can't win the world
> series" was better...
Yeah, but I could care less about the Red Sox (and besides, this is
the Cleveland Indians note, and they were actually there this year and
lost! ;-)
-Andy
|
63.1639 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 08:10 | 9 |
63.1640 | Do yourself a favor, don't get into attendance figures | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Wed Nov 01 1995 08:44 | 4 |
| Are you comparing that to the 1,800 fans that showed up regularly at
Cleveland's Municipal Stadium up until about 3 years ago?
Steve
|
63.1641 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Nov 01 1995 08:49 | 7 |
|
OK, serious question...
Does anyone seriously believe the Indians "choked" by not winning
the World Series?
Joe
|
63.1642 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos / Mil / Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 08:56 | 7 |
| RE did the Indians choke
If Groner's ask'en, yes.
If Joe's ask'en, no.
George
|
63.1643 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:01 | 4 |
| I think they choked. Going in they were the best team in baseball.
They didn't win. It's a choke.
Jimbo
|
63.1644 | definite gag job | STRATA::GARRY | | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:04 | 7 |
| I agree they choked.Where were those awesome batting stats when it
counted ??? Regular season stats don't win world series.
Biggest choke in the last 20 or so years.
Tom
|
63.1645 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:06 | 6 |
| They didn't choke away a likely win, no.
They performed rather miserably in the clutch throughout the last
12 games of the post-season, however. I would say that there appeared
to be additional pressure around the throat once the games were on
the line.
|
63.1646 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:09 | 19 |
| >> Prior to Bird, a person could walk up to the ticket office the
>> day of a playoff game and get seats! That shows what fan support
>> was like in Boston. Enter Bird - Enter "I've been a fan for 20 years.
>> I love this sport!"
Wrong again, Groiner. Unlike yourself and your extremely lame
excuses for the poor support that the Indians received prior
to this season, we offer no excuses beyond Boston really isn't
a basketball town. No, we won't blame it on the Garden being a
dump. Though it was. And no we won't blame it on the teams being
lousy. We can't do that because we have the greatest franchise in
the history of the sport. It's really only as simple the town
belonging to the Red Sox and the Bruins and the 'Tics only managed
to make inroads due to one of the greatest players and one of the
greatest rivalry in the history of the game. The real question for
you Clevelanders is how long will you be able to sustain this fan
support if your team continues to choke in the big one.
|
63.1647 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos / Mil / Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:14 | 20 |
| Don't anyone tell Groner I said this but no, I don't think they choked.
I think the whole purpose of settling the strike and running Major League
baseball this year was to come up with sacrificial offerings to be mowed down
by the Atlanta Braves pitching staff. They were genuine, they were awsome, they
were for real.
They were solid all year and during the playoffs they faced three of the best
hitting teams in baseball, the Rockies, the Reds, and the Indians and shut them
all down without a single slugfest. The best any team could do against them was
a pitching duel.
As someone in the Globe said, the last game was a 1-0 blow out. Once Justice
hit the home run it was over. They were that good.
The Indians had a fine season and Indians fans should be proud but they got
beat by a better team with one of the best starting rotations of all time. It
finally rained for the Braves and it rained pitchers.
George
|
63.1648 | the Tribe choked! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:20 | 12 |
|
> the last game was a 1-0 blow out.
Me thinks "someone" should stick to commentating
on figure skating and "mega-media" trials if'n he
thinks 1-0 in baseball is a "blow out".
JMHO
billl
|
63.1649 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:22 | 10 |
|
Yes, Cleveland CHOKED. The had the best record in baseball. A
team BA of .295 for the season. Led the league in Homeruns and many
other categorys. When the playoffs started, the players choked and
didn't hit very well. I believe Cleveland got out homered in all
three playoff series. What was there team BA for the entire playoffs?
It was probably right around .200. Which is a dramtic drop in
production.
Ron
|
63.1650 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:25 | 25 |
|
The reason I ask...
IMHO, there are three ways a team can choke:
1) Against a roughly equal opponent, have the game/series in hand,
and then lose it.
2) Lose against a notably inferior opponent.
3) Against a roughly equal opponent, get blown out.
Which means, as I see it, the only team to choke in the 1995
baseball playoffs was the Yankees, on the basis of #1.
But the only argument I see for the Indians choking is #2, and I
don't buy that. Even though I did believe the Tribe to be the
superior team, I was never convinced that the gap was huge; add
in the homefield advantage for Atlanta, and while I would not
_predict_ an Atlanta victory, it's hardly _choking_ on the part
of the Indians not to win.
JMHO,
Joe
|
63.1651 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos / Mil / Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:25 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1648 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all..." >>>
> Me thinks "someone" should stick to commentating
> on figure skating and "mega-media" trials if'n he
> thinks 1-0 in baseball is a "blow out".
Me thinks you weren't watching the game or if you were you didn't understand
what you were seeing.
The phrase is in reference to the fact that Tommy Glavine and Mark Wohlers
were practically unhittable and a 1 run lead against the best hitting team in
baseball was as good as a blowout.
George
|
63.1652 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:28 | 13 |
|
I would say it was a minor choke. Atlanta is, and has been, a very good team.
No shame in losing to them. It by no means should be mentioned in the same
breath as the Buckner collapse in 1986.
It wasn't so much that Cleveland lost as the way that they lost. We were
treated to "Cleveland Indians == BATTING POWER" p-names, and the Tribe had the
most ballyhooed offense in recent years, then basically didn't hit much in the
playoffs. A 100-44 record indicates that they did a pretty good job of
beating up on *everybody* during the regular season, which would make you
expect more of the same in the World Series.
Speaking of all of this, where's Hal?
|
63.1653 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:33 | 9 |
63.1654 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos / Mil / Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:34 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1650 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> Even though I did believe the Tribe to be the
> superior team, I was never convinced that the gap was huge;
The Tribe wasn't the superior team. They had superior hitting and good
pitching but the Braves had superior pitching and good hitting.
If the Tribe made a mistake I think it was in not adjusting their rotation so
that Nagy pitched more. Martinez and Hershire were outstanding in the playoffs
but they are getting old and that Mariners series left them drained. If Nagy
had pitched 2 games in each series the older guys would have had more stuff for
the World Series and the odds are the outcome would have been different.
As it was Nagy only pitched once per series. His younger age and stamina were
wasted.
George
|
63.1655 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:35 | 6 |
63.1656 | Get rid of the swagger, until you've won something | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:38 | 12 |
|
> Does anyone seriously believe the Indians "choked" by not winning
> the World Series?
I think they underachieved, which can be upgraded to "choke" when
you consider how arrogant so many of the Indians' players seem
to be. I didn't really see it until they were on the national stage
(the Braves sure saw it), but these Indians really could become
dislikable over the years for reasons other than the Groaner... ;-)
glenn
|
63.1657 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:45 | 8 |
| Red Sox were supposed to lose to the Indians = no choke
Indians should have won it all IMO, they didn't = choke
Choke means a thousand different things to a thousand different
people, it's useless to try and define it, but in the 96 Websters
edition they'll be a team picture of the Indians next to CHOKE.
Jimbo
|
63.1658 | I haven't had time to check "The Line" yet... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Wed Nov 01 1995 09:46 | 27 |
| > A team can only choke if:
>
> a) they are favored
> b) if they have home field advantage
>
> The Indians didn't choke v.s. Atlanta because they had neither.
Pardon me? They had a). And to boot...
from 63.1508 (authored by ROCK::GRONOWSKI)
> The Indians will win the World Series this year because it is DESTINY!
>
> They have never lost a playoff series to the Red Sox and they destroyed
> them.
>
> They have never lost a playoff series to the Mariners and they busted
> them up!
>
> They have never lost a playoff series to the Braves and they will eat
> them up and spit them out.
from 63.1519
> I agree, Braves will three-peat-choke in 4 or 5.
Who is the world to argue with such genius and certitude?
|
63.1659 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:07 | 9 |
| Hard to believe Groaner forgot to delete those.
The lack of clutch hitting (ala 1980's Pgh Pirates)
when it was most needed is why I consider this a
choke.
billl
|
63.1660 | choke/no choke? | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:19 | 18 |
|
No choke here.
The tribe lost against a superior pitching staff. Where'd they
get the monster averages from? Against the rest of the AL pitching
staffs. Had the tribe played in the NL would their averages been
as high. Cleveland needs to look at why they lost and fix IT.
IT being a better starting rotation than this years team. Had
Cleveland played anyone other than the Braves I think the outcome
would have been different. As it was the best 2 teams from both
leagues showed up and the better team won.
JMHO Shark
|
63.1661 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:20 | 4 |
|
Lakers were loaded and still need the refs to get by the Pistons. I
would call Chicago's threepeat more specatcular......and neither is
greater than 8 straight.....
|
63.1662 | 5 1 run games | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:23 | 4 |
| Indians didn't choke.
Good pitching beats good hitting most of the time.
JMHO
|
63.1663 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:35 | 12 |
| > 1) Against a roughly equal opponent, have the game/series in hand,
> and then lose it.
>
> 2) Lose against a notably inferior opponent.
>
> 3) Against a roughly equal opponent, get blown out.
Well, I would add a fourth way:
4) Have numerous opportunities to win games, and thereby the series,
against a team that is equal (or inferior) and continually waste
those opportunities.
|
63.1664 | nothing but a choke | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:56 | 4 |
63.1665 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 01 1995 10:58 | 8 |
| Of course one factor in baseball is that since there are never any real
inter-league games until the World Series we don't really know what those 100
A.L. wins really mean.
Also, against the Braves the Indians were 2-1 with the DH and 0-3 without the
DH. That continues to be a factor.
George
|
63.1666 | RE: -2 Huh? | CNTROL::SALMON | | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:01 | 5 |
| re: -1663
But the team that continualy left men on base (in scoring
position) did NOT lose! The Braves continualy left men in scoring
prosition and WON the series. They won it on superior pitching! Nobody
every claimed they were a GREAT hitting team.
|
63.1667 | No shame on Indians here | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:05 | 7 |
| I couldn't call the Indians effort a choke by any means, especially
when they won game 5 against Maddox. Their hitting which GM Hart
described as "feasting against teams 3,4,5 pitchers" was overrated for
a short series condition.
Look at Cinci and some good Dodger teams in the 70s vs As and later the
Yankees. Not to speak of 1970 Reds vs Orioles.
|
63.1668 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:06 | 3 |
| He said that he considered there were 3 ways to choke; I pointed
out that I thought there was a 4th way. I didn't say I thought it
necessarily applied to the Indians.
|
63.1669 | Misunderstood! | CNTROL::SALMON | | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:10 | 5 |
| Re: -1
Oh, OK. I thought you were implying it to the Indians.
GREAT series though, neither team or it's fans should be
dissapointed!
|
63.1670 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:27 | 7 |
|
Needless to say everybody will change there tune. When Groaner
says that the Red Sox didn't choke against Cleveland. They just lost
to a better team. Since Paul still feels that the Sox choked against
Cleveland. Then Cleveland DEFINITELY CHOKED against Atlanta.
Ron :^)
|
63.1671 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:35 | 4 |
63.1672 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:42 | 9 |
|
re .1671,
Its called rooting for your team. Even though realisticly
they don't have a chance. You could also call it NON-Bandwagon
jumping. You stick with your team until the end. Did I root for the
Sox to beat Cleveland? YES. Did I honestly think they would win? NO
Ron
|
63.1673 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Nov 01 1995 11:47 | 7 |
63.1674 | | MIMS::MITCHAM_A | -Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta) | Wed Nov 01 1995 12:04 | 29 |
| RE: Note 63.1671 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI:
> Red Sox had home field advantage against the Indians and everyone in
> RED_SOX told me how the Indians would lose. If that's not a choke,
> what is?
What's this infatuation you have with the Red Sox? The Indians beat them
in the playoffs -- isn't that enough? No wonder they call you "Groaner"...
RE: Note 63.1673 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI:
> I get it, so if you say the "Sox are going to beat the Indians in the
> playoffs" in the notesfile, and the Sox lose, you really didn't mean
> they would win, you just wanted them to win. Of course, if the Sox
> did win, then we'd be hearing, "I predicted the Sox would beat the
> Indians."
Well, let's see...I've taken the liberty to change a few words in the above
paragraph, a sorta litmus test if you will, to see if you've got it:
> I get it, so if I say the "Indians are going to beat the Braves in the
> World Series" in the notesfile, and the Indians lose, I really didn't
> mean they would win, I just wanted them to win. Of course, if the
> Indians did win, then you'd be hearing, "I predicted the Indians would beat
> the Braves."
Yep, I think you've got it.
-Andy
|
63.1675 | Congrats to Atlanta | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Nov 02 1995 17:57 | 35 |
|
Have to give Atlanta some credit for the big win on Saturday.
10 more feet on two of those balls hit in the 9th could have tied it.
Feel sorry for ole Carlos though.....ends 3 games with him at bat.
Smart job of not pitching to Albert. Hard to believe the Indians
couldn't score 1 run in the final game. This will be riding hard on
the Tribe throughout the winter.
I will have to say one thing about the umps......I really thought
they called a very bad series. Didn't like that last ump at all!!!
I really can't believe they call those balls that are 6-8 inches
outside, strikes. It had to make the Indians feel they had to swing at
anything close...not their style.
Only problem I saw with the Indians was Manny.....you just got to
run alittle bit. In both games 1 and 2, I felt he could have made a
couple of those plays out there....instead, he took the sure approach
instead of the ... give an extra 50% and if the ball gets by, Lofton
will get it.
At any rate, many of those games could have gone the other way if
a timely hit was made. Many opertunities were not taken advantage of.
Greatest Series I've ever seen! I just feel lucky I was able to see
game 1 of the divisional series and game 3 of the ALCS. I'll never
forget it!!! Made me feel like a 12 yr old....
Ladies and Gentelman......welcome to the main event.......I loved
game 3! Mom said she was getting season tickets for next year....good
deal!
Long live the Chief.....
WAHOOOOO!
|
63.1676 | I don't think so! | ACISS1::WIERSBECK | I sweat Mickey Mouse | Fri Nov 03 1995 09:00 | 8 |
| Maybe this has been discussed, but that PA announcer prior to Game 3
made the introductions sound like you were at a WWF Main Event. I'll
bet a lot of purists were rolling over on that one.
Could you see that at Fenway or Yankee Stadium?
Spud
|
63.1677 | | MIMS::MITCHAM_A | -Andy in Alpharetta (near Atlanta) | Mon Nov 06 1995 11:31 | 11 |
| > Maybe this has been discussed, but that PA announcer prior to Game 3
> made the introductions sound like you were at a WWF Main Event. I'll
> bet a lot of purists were rolling over on that one.
The start of game 3 had me *rolling* (ha ha ha). First they start out
with some drab (dark?) background music and announce the names of the
Braves team while the fans boo (yes, boo). Then, when the Indians team
gets announced, the whole production changes like they are the saviors of
the world! Tee hee, really had me reeling... :-)
-Andy
|
63.1678 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Mon Dec 11 1995 21:24 | 11 |
63.1679 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Tue Dec 12 1995 07:56 | 5 |
| Re: The best get better.
I wasn't aware that Atlanta had made any moves to improve their team.
Steve
|
63.1680 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Tue Dec 12 1995 08:35 | 3 |
| > The Indians are on the move...
Whew! For a second I thought you meant the vans were lined up... :-)
|
63.1681 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Tue Dec 12 1995 08:36 | 5 |
| > Re: The best get better.
>
> I wasn't aware that Atlanta had made any moves to improve their team.
Cut him a *little* slack. At least they were the best AL team...
|
63.1682 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Dec 12 1995 08:56 | 9 |
|
> Meanwhile, Aggie headed back to Minnesota. You got to love those
> trades.
Hmmm... if you _don't_ believe Frankie R. is going to be a decent
major league pitcher, wouldn't _you_ rather have the two extra
draft picks?
Joe
|
63.1683 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:28 | 5 |
| > Hmmm... if you _don't_ believe Frankie R. is going to be a decent
> major league pitcher, wouldn't _you_ rather have the two extra
> draft picks?
I don't believe Boston gets draft picks, since they didn't offer arbitration.
|
63.1684 | | CSLALL::BRULE | country in need of a leader | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:39 | 10 |
| Boston has nothing but the memory of Aggie serving up the gopher ball
to Belle to show for the trade. But I think that they still needed to
make the deal. If DD hadn't the starting pitchers probably would have
revolted because of all of the blown saves. The interesting thing about
Aggie is that they are making him a starter. A lot of his incentives
are related to stats that starting pitchers get. Boston is banking on
picking up a reliever cheaply in the Free Agent market. Aggie lost
about 1-2 mill per year by the Red Sox not picking up his contract.
Mike
|
63.1685 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:46 | 9 |
| I agree with Mike, Aggie was a gamble that didn't pay off. Had he gotten
Bell out the Indians would have come to fenway tied 1 game each and who knows
what would have happened? Obviously the odds would still have been with the
Indians but the Sox would have been alive.
When ever a team makes a trade of a prospect for a guy who can help right
now that always looks bad if they don't win.
George
|
63.1686 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:48 | 4 |
|
My error - I thought he'd been offered arbitration.
Joe
|
63.1687 | | CSLALL::BRULE | country in need of a leader | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:59 | 12 |
| Joe,
I think that's where the Sox blew it. If they offer arbitration then
they would have gotten draft picks if someone signs him. If nooone
signs him then the Sox can still negotiate with him. If Aggie gets what
he wants from the arbitrator it's still only a one year deal. If the
Sox were to win the arbitration they have a proven relief pitcher.
The Indians have done a nice job with their contracts this year. I
think they made a good deal with Nagy. Gammons said that they've sold
out the park for next year. Maybe they'll take that money and get one
more hitter like McGriff or a pitcher. They have to start to think
about what it will take to beat the Braves in the WS
|
63.1688 | Albert needs some | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Tue Dec 12 1995 10:04 | 1 |
| Maybe they'll use some of the money to send Albert to Charm School*(((
|
63.1689 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Tue Dec 12 1995 10:06 | 8 |
| Braves already re-signed McGriff, as well as Grissom. Only folks they
didn't offer contracts to were O'Brien, Pena (got a minor league
contract with the Marlins) and I think Deveraux. Could be others but
it looks like the lineup will stay the same. Merker could be gone
too.
UMDan
|
63.1690 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Dec 12 1995 10:13 | 11 |
|
> Maybe they'll use some of the money to send Albert to Charm School*(((
Do you subscribe to BA?
Albert's problem _isn't_ that he needs charm school. Under the right
circumstances he can be a very pleasant person. His problem is that
he has both a temper _and_ a short fuse. A stress management course
might be more useful...
Joe
|
63.1691 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Tue Dec 12 1995 10:31 | 1 |
| ...or lithium
|
63.1692 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Never make it up to Coeur D'Alene | Tue Dec 12 1995 11:07 | 13 |
|
I don't think the Sox were permitted to offer Aguilera arbitration.
He had the one-year option, so it was pick that up or nothing. And
at $4.5M, it wasn't worth it.
> Albert's problem _isn't_ that he needs charm school. Under the right
> circumstances he can be a very pleasant person.
Couldn't you say that about just about anyone? Under controlled
laboratory conditions, the Groaner can actually be a nice guy... ;-)
glenn
|
63.1693 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Tue Dec 12 1995 11:09 | 7 |
| > Couldn't you say that about just about anyone? Under controlled
> laboratory conditions, the Groaner can actually be a nice guy... ;-)
I suspect I could get a $10-15 million grant from the federal govt
to test this theory. I would suspect my research would not bear this
supposition out.
|
63.1694 | btw, too bad about the big guy; but keep him out of animation | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Dec 12 1995 11:28 | 5 |
| But Glenn, a frosty in the tummy, another ice cole one on the table, a
choice fenway ducat in the pocket and a short walk across the street
for nine innings of his favorite pastime is hardly "laboratory
conditions". Even the late lamented Godzilla could produce a smiley
here.
|
63.1695 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Dec 12 1995 13:35 | 7 |
| re: Cleveland's signings
6 years for Omar Vizquel ??? 6 years is a gamble on anyone.
And 4 for Ramirez ? He's had one good year. I know Joe H's formulas
have him breaking the career HR record, but c'mon. But hey, there's
no salary cap in MLB, so who cares...
|
63.1696 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Dec 12 1995 14:19 | 34 |
|
JoeG,
>re: Cleveland's signings
>
>6 years for Omar Vizquel ??? 6 years is a gamble on anyone.
OK, I 99% agree with you here. Giving a 6 year contract to
Vizquel probably will prove to be a bad move (particularly
with Wilson on the way), and 6 years is a gamble on anyone.
In a few cases, it's a very _reasonable_ gamble (never with
pitchers, and only rarely with hitters), but it's still a
gamble.
>And 4 for Ramirez ? He's had one good year. I know Joe H's formulas
>have him breaking the career HR record, but c'mon. But hey, there's
>no salary cap in MLB, so who cares...
Joe, whether or not Ramirez breaks the HR record or even comes
close, this was an _incredibly_ good move; rather the opposite of
what the Yankees have been doing lately, so I can understand if you're
jealous... B^)
Ramirez has had two good years in the majors, and three good years in
the minors before that. He's the kind of player you _always_ want
to lock up - barring injury (which the Indians probably bought
insurance in case of), he should only improve over the course of the
contract. It's not a mega-bucks contract; compare it to what other
great young hitters (Thomas, Griffey) will end up grossing in the
3rd through 6th years of their careers, and it's a bargain. It's
just the kind of contract the Yankees should be getting ready for
Jeter in another year.
Joe
|
63.1697 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Dec 12 1995 16:10 | 4 |
| Joe H,
How did Cleveland get Ramirez from the Mets ? Did some in NY miss
the ball on this kid, or could he be a one-year wonder ?
|
63.1698 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Dec 12 1995 16:23 | 18 |
|
Joe,
>How did Cleveland get Ramirez from the Mets ? Did some in NY miss
>the ball on this kid, or could he be a one-year wonder ?
You're getting players confused - the Tribe got Jeromy Burnitz
from the Mets; he's a very useful player, but very unlikely at
this point to ever see stardom, and has only about a 50-50 shot
at ever being a regular (though he would be better than a number
of regulars right now). Burnitz was acquired along with Roe (P)
from the Mets for Mlicki (P), Byrd (P), and DiPoto (P).
Ramirez was originally drafted by the Tribe, and came up through
the system. He's the real deal, and has not one, but two very good
ML seasons already under his belt. He's also only 23 (24?).
Joe
|
63.1699 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Dec 12 1995 21:41 | 17 |
63.1700 | Take two of these and call me in the mornin. | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Wed Dec 13 1995 07:15 | 18 |
| Re .1690
> Maybe they'll use some of the money to send Albert to Charm School*(((
Do you subscribe to BA?
** No, Do you subscribe to the New England Journal of Medicine
Albert's problem _isn't_ that he needs charm school. Under the right
circumstances he can be a very pleasant person. His problem is that
he has both a temper _and_ a short fuse. A stress management course
might be more useful...
Joe
** I'll take your word for it. Take a chill pill ok Doc. I could care
less about what's wrong with Albert Belle. Obviously your a little
sensitive about it though.
|
63.1701 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 07:58 | 4 |
63.1702 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Wed Dec 13 1995 08:52 | 4 |
| > Hey pal, watch it or i'll send some slimy guys over there to rough you
> up!
Keep your family out of it! :-)
|
63.1703 | WWF HLO Cage Match | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Wed Dec 13 1995 09:10 | 8 |
| Whoa, Grono off the bench for a third man in.
Looks like it's gonna be the first floor against the third floor. Two
outta three falls. I'll take IMJIMBO as a tag team partner*((((
PS. Iceman, Did the Cleveland Barons ever win a Stanley Cup?
Bruce
|
63.1704 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Dec 13 1995 10:27 | 13 |
| > Ramirez is not a one year wonder, and if you believe that, well,
> I'll put less weight on your comments in the future. As Joe H
> said, Manny has had two solid seasons and is still *VERY* young.
What were Ramirez' '94 #s (please) ?
Hey Groaner, at the top for the next 3-5 years ??? Those young pitchers
(Tavarez, Ogea, and whoever is in the minors) better develop into big-time
starters for that to come true, 'cause Martinez and Hershiser *might* have
one more good year left in 'em (as #1 and #2 in the rotation). Despite
all their hitting abilities, if not for Orel, they either wouldn't have
been in the Series, or would have been skunked.
|
63.1705 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 11:04 | 15 |
63.1706 | Ramirez much more than a one-year wonder... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Wed Dec 13 1995 11:13 | 17 |
| > Ramirez played in 91 games in 1994. He hit .269 with 17 HRs and 60
> RBI. Projected to 162 games that's 30 Hrs, and 107 RBI.
Just some further info. Stats, Inc. projected players out, keeping in mind
percentage of games they'd played to that point, who was left on the schedule,
etc., etc. (This is regarding 1994.)
Ramirez projected to 26 HR, 79 RBI for the year - not quite as impressive as a
162-games played projection, but still nothing to sneeze at. I believe the
games played estimate for him was somewhere in the 130s - I hope to check it
tonight. (I also think his BA projection was somewhere around .275 or so.)
Not that I'm inclined to jump to the defense of the Indian faithful, but in
this case I think calling Ramirez a "one-year wonder" is too harsh.
I agree with Groaner about the Listach/Lofton travesty. Lofton helped carry my
Rotisserie team to the pennant that year... :-)
|
63.1707 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 11:25 | 6 |
63.1708 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Dec 13 1995 11:35 | 4 |
| Hey Groaner, I merely asked if giving Ramirez a 4-year contract after one
big year is a risk. Your pointing out Listash and Hamelin are PERFECT
examples of kids who blew their wad upon arrival, and have done nothing
since.
|
63.1710 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 13 1995 12:33 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1708 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>Hey Groaner, I merely asked if giving Ramirez a 4-year contract after one
>big year is a risk. Your pointing out Listash and Hamelin are PERFECT
>examples of kids who blew their wad upon arrival, and have done nothing
>since.
Giving anyone a 4 year contract is a risk but Ramirez is a better bet than
Listash. Listash never really had much in the way of power, Ramirez does. He
also seems to have good bat control for a power hitter. He's a bit of a hot
head but that usually gets better not worse.
Earlier someone mentioned his coming from New York. Actually he grew up in
New York which may have caused the confusion.
George
|
63.1711 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Dec 13 1995 13:02 | 16 |
|
> Do you subscribe to BA?
> ** No, Do you subscribe to the New England Journal of Medicine
I only asked because the cartoon in the most recent Baseball America
suggests that Belle's off season training consists of going to charm
school...
> ** I'll take your word for it. Take a chill pill ok Doc. I could care
> less about what's wrong with Albert Belle. Obviously your a little
> sensitive about it though.
Not particularly, to be honest; just offering my perspective.
Joe
|
63.1712 | As Rosanne Rosanna danna Said "Never Mind" | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Wed Dec 13 1995 13:43 | 3 |
| Oh, Insert embarrassed Face here.
Me and Jimbo stll want Grono in the cage though*(((
|
63.1713 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:04 | 4 |
63.1714 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:06 | 17 |
63.1715 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:10 | 3 |
| > I could get the Naughty NoTY award this year
What about the "Obnoxious NotY" ?
|
63.1717 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:19 | 3 |
63.1718 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:20 | 2 |
63.1719 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:20 | 3 |
63.1720 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:21 | 3 |
63.1722 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:35 | 3 |
63.1723 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Dec 14 1995 13:35 | 2 |
| WFAN is reporting that Cleveland is holding a press conference today
to announce they've signed McDowell.
|
63.1724 | Parade in October! | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Thu Dec 14 1995 14:33 | 1 |
|
|
63.1725 | Good move | CSLALL::BRULE | country in need of a leader | Thu Dec 14 1995 14:45 | 7 |
| This puts Cleveland way above all other AL teams. They should be the
favorites to win the AL. So the starters should be Martinez,
Orel,MacDowell,Ogea and Nagy? Does this give them enough to get by
Atlanta? Now will someone please tell me that nothing is more importent
then a smart front office.
Mike
|
63.1726 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Dec 14 1995 14:50 | 3 |
| > This puts Cleveland way above all other AL teams.
And in the spot to be the '96 "disappointment of the year".
|
63.1727 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Dec 14 1995 14:59 | 10 |
| Well it puts them ahead on paper. But then that assumes that no one gets
hurt, no one has a bad year, no one gets old and looses it, the team continues
to be well coached, etc.
In baseball the difference between the best team and the next few is never
so great that these types of problems can't reel that team back in. The Indians
have been the best team in the league two years in a row now. It's difficult
to keep dodging bullets and keep that kind of string going.
George
|
63.1728 | Injuries are key | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Thu Dec 14 1995 15:13 | 10 |
| re. -1 - You got that right, George. Atlanta's success can be tied to
the fact that their starting pitchers have by and large been injury
free. The other injuries on the team have been minor, and the subs
have performed when called on. Have Justice, Maddux and a Lopez go
down at once and your talking a whole different game then.
As long as Cleveland and Atlanta stay healthy, look for a repeat
appearance by both in the WS.
UMDan
|
63.1729 | | GLRMAI::FINIZIO | | Thu Dec 14 1995 15:22 | 5 |
|
CNN also reported that the indians are making an offer to
Kevin Brown.......
|
63.1730 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Thu Dec 14 1995 15:51 | 5 |
63.1731 | They are the favorites | CSLALL::BRULE | country in need of a leader | Thu Dec 14 1995 15:54 | 3 |
| That's right Paul, Anything less then a World Series win for the
Indians would be a big Choke. The Sox are still 2-3 years away.
|
63.1732 | | GLRMAI::FINIZIO | | Thu Dec 14 1995 16:26 | 6 |
|
McDowell is a good pitcher but not a great pitcher IMO...however
it is a good move by the tribe....anyone hear how many Years
he's getting?
|
63.1733 | Nothing but the Championship is a choke: BACK-2-BACK | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Dec 14 1995 17:07 | 5 |
63.1734 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Thu Dec 14 1995 18:26 | 9 |
63.1735 | McDowell needs offensive 'cause he ain't that good | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Fri Dec 15 1995 07:21 | 9 |
|
McDowell will win about 25 games or so for the Indians, for the
reason Paul stated. He puts in alot of innings and is around for
most of his decisions. Point is though Cleveland is the only team
that can afford to let a starting pitcher give up 4 runs a game and
still win.
Jerry
|
63.1736 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Dec 15 1995 10:05 | 8 |
| Cleveland gets into the post-season with or without McDowell, and
he's not that good that he's going to win big games in the post-season
(ala Hershiser). So it's like, "why bother" ? But, the way I see it,
McDowell gives them insurance in case one of their OLD GUYS (ie: Martinez,
Hershiser) breaks down. It's going to happen eventually...'96, '97...
And yes, McDowell is a good fit for Cleveland 'cause he's a work horse,
and that offense can support a 4-5 ERA.
|
63.1737 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Dec 15 1995 10:11 | 37 |
|
> -< McDowell needs offensive 'cause he ain't that good >-
You know, for a while I got annoyed at how the general opinion of
McDowell was that he was the best pitcher (or very close to it)
in baseball; he wasn't, he was merely a good, consistent pitcher.
Now that's been turned around - when people discovered that he wasn't
great, they decided he wasn't good, but he is - he's the 90's version
of Jack Morris.
At this point, I expect the Indians to do approximately as well as they
did last year. The pitching should be roughly equal or a little
better - we can't expect as good performances from Mesa, Tavarez,
Hershiser, and Martinez, but could see better performances from Nagy,
Ogea, and Poole, and McDowell is better than the Black/Grimsley/Hill
combo.
Offensively, Belle and Murray are likely to be down, we still can't
anticipate any particular contribution from the catcher slot, and
Vizquel's still Vizquel, but a year older; Thome, Ramirez, and Baerga
should be able to put up roughly the same performance as last year;
Lofton should be healthy, and therefore better, and Franco will take
at bats away from Sorrento (who won't be around) and Murray. Also,
Giles & Burnitz will replace Kirby and Winfield, which can't hurt.
There's no reason to expect the team to be _better_ than last year,
really, but good reason to expect them to be _as good_, which is
a major accomplishment.
And yes, JoeG, I agree - if the Tribe _doesn't_ make it to the World
Series again next year, they will be a significant disappointment.
But they certainly seem to be doing something towards that end, and
I wouldn't anticipate a collapse. They're in a better position to
survive injuries, though of course a rash of injuries would still
hurt.
Joe
|
63.1738 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Fri Dec 15 1995 10:22 | 12 |
|
Sox fans have to come to the conclusion that Fenway park must go.
The Sox will not win a WS playing in Fenway. The economics of baseball
have changed and the Sox can't compete anymore. The Tribe has sold
out Jacobs field for '96. Which has enabled them to increase there
payroll to 43 million and still make money. DD worked miracles in
Montreal with a small payroll. He should be able to put together a
competitive team in Boston with a 34-36 million payroll. Without the
added revenue of a 55-60K stadium. The Sox will always be one or two
players short.
Ron
|
63.1739 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Fri Dec 15 1995 10:36 | 15 |
63.1740 | Just a couple more reasons to dislike the Tribe... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Never make it up to Coeur D'Alene | Fri Dec 15 1995 11:16 | 8 |
|
McDowell will win 24-25 games in his dreams. I'll take the under on
that one. If the Tribe is picking up both McDowell and Kevin Brown,
they've obviously decided that one Albert Belle-sized attitude is not
enough.
glenn
|
63.1741 | Jack McDowell: Public Enemy #1 | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Never make it up to Coeur D'Alene | Fri Dec 15 1995 11:18 | 12 |
|
> Cleveland gets into the post-season with or without McDowell, and
> he's not that good that he's going to win big games in the post-season
> (ala Hershiser). So it's like, "why bother" ?
Gotta admit that this is quite a reversal, Joe. I'd been singing this
tune but a couple of short months ago it was supposedly McDowell and
Cone that were going to propel the Yankees to a pennant, those
"big game" pitchers in a short series...
glenn
|
63.1742 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Fri Dec 15 1995 11:49 | 8 |
|
MCdowell's a stiff. I wish the Indians had passed on the bum. He had a
few good years when the Soxs where scoring 8 9 runs a ballgame for him.
Teams have figured him out and he's been on the decline the last few
years and imo will continue to decline. Bad move should have let the
Yankees keep the bum........
mike
|
63.1743 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Fri Dec 15 1995 12:17 | 6 |
| >If the Tribe is picking up both McDowell and Kevin Brown,
> they've obviously decided that one Albert Belle-sized attitude is not
> enough.
I'd say that about Kevin Brown, but not necessarily McDowell. McDowell is
an outspoken guy, so he catches more flak from the media than most folks.
|
63.1744 | | GLRMAI::FINIZIO | | Fri Dec 15 1995 13:11 | 4 |
|
yeah and he knows how to flip the bird!
|
63.1745 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Fri Dec 15 1995 13:22 | 5 |
63.1746 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Never make it up to Coeur D'Alene | Fri Dec 15 1995 13:25 | 11 |
|
> So he flipped the fans the bird... so Belle lost his cool and drilled
> an alcoholic in the chest with a ball for being taunted... you people
> are hypocrites... I'm sure every single person in here has done
> something like this in their life at least once.
Never flipped anyone the bird (that would be hypocritical for a
non-Mass driver), but I have drilled a few alcoholics in my day...
glenn
|
63.1747 | Indians are so much better than the rest of the AL | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass knocks off #1 - again! | Fri Dec 15 1995 14:03 | 7 |
| McDowell is a good innings man who will be a nice addition to the
Indians rotation, but he is an above average pitcher, not a great one.
I think he'll go something like 18-7 with at 3.75 or so ERA, as the
Indians set a major league record for winning percentage in a season at
.770 in 1996.
NAZZ
|
63.1748 | a great signing | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Fri Dec 15 1995 14:27 | 22 |
| basically a rehash of other comments:
o Indians have tons of offense, so they need nothing more than
a solid innings guy.
o McDowell is a great innings guy - doesn't put up the *monster*
ERA numbers, but he's very consistent
o He also has quite a few years left in him
o He also comes cheaper than Cone will, with Cone not providing
measurably more upside in this context. (How many 1-0 and 2-1
games will the Indians need to win?)
The only drawback I see for the Indians is the need to obtain/develop a
"Mr. Clutch" for when Martinez and Hershiser are gone. McDowell may or may
not be it. Hershiser has that certain something - a couple of years ago,
the guy was ready for the scrap heap, and late last year, he was *incredibly*
tough.
They're in great shape if Ogea or Tavarez develops into that kind of pitcher -
but I'll tell you right now, Albie Lopez won't...
|
63.1749 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Fri Dec 15 1995 14:29 | 4 |
63.1750 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Dec 15 1995 15:26 | 23 |
| > Can any one of the clowns who claim McDowell's a 4-5 ERA pitcher,
> supply the statistical proof for this?
> 1990 3.82 14- 9
> 1991 3.41 17-10
> 1992 3.18 20-10
> 1993 3.37 22-10
> 1994 3.73 10- 9
> 1995 3.93 15-10
> Can someone show me where Jack McDowell has *EVER* had an ERA over
> 4.00 ERA for a season, let alone the 5.00 number one genius is
> reporting. Must just be sour grapes.
Sour grapes ? You obviously didn't read my note in its entirety, did you.
I said he's a perfect fit for Cleveland, but that they'd get in the playoffs
without him, and that he's not a Hershiser-type in the big game.
As for the 4-5 ERA, that means "between 4 and 5". Check the pattern
of your own stats above. He finished below 4.00 this year, but that
was with the help of a great finish. He was well above 4 most of the
year. He'll be above 4 this year, but it won't matter with that offense.
|
63.1751 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Dec 15 1995 15:31 | 19 |
| >> Cleveland gets into the post-season with or without McDowell, and
>> he's not that good that he's going to win big games in the post-season
>> (ala Hershiser). So it's like, "why bother" ?
> Gotta admit that this is quite a reversal, Joe. I'd been singing this
> tune but a couple of short months ago it was supposedly McDowell and
> Cone that were going to propel the Yankees to a pennant, those
> "big game" pitchers in a short series...
Selective memory Glenn ? You said he wasn't that great when we got him,
then when he finished strong you wrote a retraction yourself.
Based on his Aug-Sep finish, I believe I was justified in thinking he
and Cone would give the Yanks a strong 1-2 in the playoffs. Now, after
seeing him get hammered by Seattle, it would be foolish of me to think of
him as a "big game" pitcher, wouldn't it.
Of course, he had some injury problems at the end, so maybe that affected
his performance.
|
63.1752 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Dec 15 1995 15:34 | 7 |
| > The best of the lot of Indians pitchers will be Jaret Wright or Bartolo
> Colon. Ogea and Tavarez can fight it out for the #3, #4 slot. Of
> course, Ogea would be the #1 guy on the Sox.
Grono, explain to me how these guys are going to develop into ANY KIND OF
ML pitcher when Martinez, Hershiser, McDowell and Nagy occupy 4/5's of the
rotation. It ain't gonna happen in the 'pen.
|
63.1753 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Dec 15 1995 15:43 | 6 |
|
Actually, JoeG, in the pen is just where Earl Weaver believed young
pitchers _should_ be developing - and I don't see any particular
reason to dispute that...
Joe
|
63.1754 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Dec 15 1995 15:46 | 11 |
| > Actually, JoeG, in the pen is just where Earl Weaver believed young
> pitchers _should_ be developing - and I don't see any particular
> reason to dispute that...
Being a "fact guy", I find it amusing that you believe something
just because Earl Weaver believed it.
It would seem to me that a young pitcher needs to throw as many
innings as he can, using all his "stuff". Relief appearances
are so situational and restricting that I can't see how a young
kid could "develop".
|
63.1755 | 3-ring material | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Dec 15 1995 15:52 | 6 |
63.1756 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Dec 15 1995 16:10 | 42 |
|
>> Actually, JoeG, in the pen is just where Earl Weaver believed young
>> pitchers _should_ be developing - and I don't see any particular
>> reason to dispute that...
>Being a "fact guy", I find it amusing that you believe something
>just because Earl Weaver believed it.
I don't believe it because Earl Weaver believed it. I consider it
worth considering because Weaver has a sharp understanding of baseball
(eschewing such strategies as the sac bunt in favor of the "three run
home run" - that is, walks and power). And the data I've seen
suggests that pitchers who pitch too much when young burn out early.
Given that, and given the success Weaver had with his strategy, it's
one I'd probably try if I was a manager. But, as I said, it's just
a strategy I haven't seen any particular reason _not_ to use, not
one I'd actively champion.
>It would seem to me that a young pitcher needs to throw as many
>innings as he can, using all his "stuff".
It's the "as many innings as he can" that causes problems. Look
at most top notch pitchers - with rare exception, they weren't
forced to pitch too much (particularly when tired) at a young
age.
It's the reason, btw, that I wouldn't bet on great things from
Isringhausen and Pulsipher on the Mets - Green was doing his
_best_ to cause their arms to fall off. It's something we won't
know for certain about for 5 years or so - but I bet that by that
time, they'll both be looked at as major disappointments _unless_
they stop getting overused very soon.
>Relief appearances
>are so situational and restricting that I can't see how a young
>kid could "develop".
Not knowing how pitchers "develop", I can't answer this - but it
seems to me that facing major league batters is the primary element
needed, and I'm not certain beyond that that it matters a whole lot.
Joe
|
63.1757 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Dec 15 1995 16:36 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 63.1752 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>Grono, explain to me how these guys are going to develop into ANY KIND OF
>ML pitcher when Martinez, Hershiser, McDowell and Nagy occupy 4/5's of the
>rotation. It ain't gonna happen in the 'pen.
Right now the Indians are not in building mode they are in trying to win it
all mode. The value of their players is not measured in how well they may be
some day, it's measured in what they can contribute right now. For young guys
that means working out of the bull pen keeping them in games and to heck with
how they develop in the future. Also with 3 of the 4 top starters being
somewhat long of tooth the young guys provide backup to hold the Indians over
in the event of an injury until the older guys get back or a free agent can be
brought in.
This is a good move by the Indians, just what they need to keep their chances
alive. If there is one place that rust is beginning to show in this team it's
with that old starting rotation. Adding McDowell increases their chances of
having quality starters available throughout the year. As for playoffs, it
gives them a solid starting point going in to mid summer. They can add the
necessary hired guns in late August if needed.
George
|
63.1758 | | CSLALL::BRULE | country in need of a leader | Mon Dec 18 1995 09:38 | 15 |
|
> Actually, JoeG, in the pen is just where Earl Weaver believed young
> pitchers _should_ be developing - and I don't see any particular
> reason to dispute that...
>Joe
Joe I couldn't agree more with this. The Indians will probably be in
the playoffs for the next 3-5 years. Why put a young pitcher in the
rotation and have them exposed to the pressures of having to win every
5 days? Let them do some middle relief and pitch when their teams are
either way ahead or behind. Then when a spot starter is needed they can
start. I can remember Flanagan and other O's would get their feet wet
for a year and then they get put in.
Mike
|
63.1759 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Dec 18 1995 13:29 | 12 |
| You guys are something...My comment was made after Groaner said that
Cleveland had a number of young pitchers (on the ML roster or at AAA)
that could develop into *TOP* ML starters. We're not talking about
the average Joe-shmo pitcher. If these guys are that good, they
shouldn't be wasted as mop-up men, or situational guys out of the
'pen. Maddux and Clemens didn't start that way...and I don't think
a lot of early-career innings has hurt them. Even guys like Langston
are still chugging along as effective starters.
There a lot to be said for experience as a starter, and I'm just questioning
(Groaner) how these Cle kids are going to get this experience over (at
least) the next 2 years.
|
63.1760 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Dec 18 1995 13:50 | 41 |
|
>If these guys are that good, they
>shouldn't be wasted as mop-up men, or situational guys out of the 'pen.
And that's what we're disagreing with.
>Maddux and Clemens didn't start that way...
That's correct. I don't think anyone claimed that starting in relief
is _necessary_ for success.
>and I don't think a lot of early-career innings has hurt them.
Actually, I don't think either _threw_ a lot of early-career innings,
though I could be wrong. I'm fairly certain that Clemens was 21 when
signed, and 25 or nearly so when he started piling on innings. I'm
not sure, but I don't remember Maddux putting up lots of innings
before 1990 (age 24).
In any case, heavy early workloads doesn't _necessarily_ lead to
later problems. However, it _usually_ does. Look at other pitchers
who had heavy workloads regularly before age 25 - Gooden and Saberhagen
come to mind; both had very heavy workloads, with great success, before
they turned 25. Now, they're average pitchers, with Saberhagen having
a significant injury history.
>Even guys like Langston are still chugging along as effective starters.
It can happen. I personally have no problem with _starting_ a young
pitcher, so long as the pitch count and his endurance are very
carefully monitored and acted upon. Relieving tends to have this
tendency naturally built in, while providing more opportunity for
success than for failure.
I guess the most important question, though, is: can a pitcher build
a successful career as a starter when initially working out of the
bullpen? And, can starting in the bullpen hinder a pitcher's
development? I believe the answers are "Yes" and "Not often", so
I have no problem with the Indians doing it...
Joe
|
63.1761 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 18 1995 14:12 | 9 |
| Maddux and Clemens are bad examples. Both started on teams who were not one
of the top 2 or 3 teams to beat at the time. Both were needed as starters when
they came up.
Here the situation is different. Teams like the Indians and Braves have all
the horses they need so any new guys will have to wait their turn. Their
development is a low priority compared to winning with what they've got.
George
|
63.1762 | what bandwagon is george on for the super bowl? | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Jan 03 1996 15:18 | 2 |
63.1763 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Wed Jan 03 1996 15:29 | 3 |
|
Welcome back, Groaner. I miss your carefully constructed questions. You
are a true artiste. :-)
|
63.1764 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Jan 03 1996 15:49 | 1 |
| Sorrento signed with Seattle today.
|
63.1765 | | GLRMAI::FINIZIO | | Wed Jan 03 1996 16:29 | 5 |
|
Good Pickup for seattle....they basically traded Martinez, Nelson,
and Blowers for Sorento, Davis, and Hitchcock....
|
63.1766 | sox 75 years of futility! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Jan 03 1996 23:03 | 4 |
63.1767 | Clev. and Atla the Dallas-SF of baseball? | AKOCOA::BREEN | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust | Thu Jan 04 1996 10:19 | 5 |
| Groaner, has it come down to Cleveland adding players to beat Atlanta
similar to Dallas and San Fran in football? They could have used
Franco against Glavine and Avery big time if he has his '94 form.
Now what do they do in the games with no dh? Franco at third?
|
63.1768 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jan 04 1996 11:12 | 18 |
|
> Now what do they do in the games with no dh? Franco at third?
Why in the world would you sub for the best 3B in the game?
Franco will be playing 1B part time anyway; with no DH, if will
be:
1B: Franco
2B: Baerga
SS: Vizquel
3B: Thome
LF: Belle
CF: Lofton
RF: Ramirez
C: Alomar (when he's healthy)
Joe
|
63.1769 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust | Thu Jan 04 1996 11:32 | 14 |
| Sorry I assummed Franco was brought in at DH with Murray primary at 1b.
Joe, I'm talking about world series only and what to do about Glavine
and Avery who beat you three times last fall. If you're not doing
something about that then you better hope that Hargrove is.
Those stats of yours and George's and Mr Elias etal aren't going to be
much help although if Thome plays all 162 including Petitte,Key,Johnson
and the California crew and can hit lefties then that stat will help.
The thought just came to me. Are you in fact criticizing Hargrove for
benching Thome in the first two losses vd the l'handers? I hadn't
heard it before and don't recall anyone else pushing for Thome to be
there in game 6. Perhaps you did make that call.
|
63.1770 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Thu Jan 04 1996 11:38 | 5 |
63.1771 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Thu Jan 04 1996 14:49 | 15 |
|
re .1770,
Thats assumming that Cleveland even makes it to the world series.
:^)
They will be the pre-season favorites to win the American league.
So the pressure is on they are SUPPOSE to win. Anything less then a
WS victory is a CHOKE job. :^)
Ron
|
63.1772 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jan 04 1996 14:54 | 25 |
|
> The thought just came to me. Are you in fact criticizing Hargrove for
> benching Thome in the first two losses vd the l'handers?
Yes. Not specifically, I guess - my criticism of Hargrove benching
Thome is more general than that. IMHO, Thome should only be sit when
he's being given a day off - Hargrove can confine that to lefthanders
if he wants, but there's no reason to sit Thome for Espinoza save to
give him a day's rest. Thome is so much better a hitter _vs lefties_
than Espinoza as to make a platoon ludicrous.
> I hadn't
> heard it before and don't recall anyone else pushing for Thome to be
> there in game 6. Perhaps you did make that call.
I might not have said it in here - I have been against Thome's
benchings all along, though.
Hargrove has some good characteristics as a manager - he doesn't bunt
or use the intentional walk much, and he's got an excellent record
developing young players. He even seems to be making in-roads in
developing young pitchers. But he also makes some really dumb
decisions.
Joe
|
63.1773 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Mon Feb 19 1996 10:50 | 6 |
63.1774 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Feb 19 1996 13:40 | 3 |
| > Good move by the Indians in picking up Brian Anderson.
He'll probably be their ACE by mid-season.
|
63.1775 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Feb 19 1996 14:13 | 27 |
|
>> Good move by the Indians in picking up Brian Anderson.
>He'll probably be their ACE by mid-season.
Um, how do you figure that, Joe?
For Anderson to be the best starter on the Tribe by mid-season,
he'd have to pass up:
Hershiser
Martinez
Nagy
Ogea
McDowell
Lopez
Tavarez
maybe Clark (Anderson might already be ahead in that comparison)
I just don't see it. I wouldn't rule out the possibility, but Anderson
would have to take a big leap forward, and I don't expect that this
year. Despite your dire predictions, I don't think the Tribe's in
particularly bad shape pitching-wise this year. Hart _knows_ that
Hershiser and Martinez are on their last legs; I would be very
surprised if he lets more than one top notch prospect go...
Joe
|
63.1776 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Feb 19 1996 15:21 | 16 |
| > Um, how do you figure that, Joe?
> Hershiser
> Martinez
> Nagy
> Ogea
> McDowell
It's a joke JoeH...a follow-up to a prediction I made a week or so ago
that the Indians' starting rotation may have problems through the 1st
half of the season. I've never thought much of Nagy (OK, nothing great),
and McDowell would have been crowned Ed Whitson II based on his pre-All
Star Break performance. Who knows if Ogea repeats. Martinez...how far
can guts alone carry him ? That leaves Hershiser to carry them (just like
in last year's post-season !!)
|
63.1777 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Feb 19 1996 15:58 | 31 |
|
> I've never thought much of Nagy (OK, nothing great),
OK, I'll buy that. Before his injury he did appear to be a step
better than that, but I wouldn't argue that he's been anything
better than good since then.
>and McDowell would have been crowned Ed Whitson II based on his pre-All
>Star Break performance.
You're underrating McDowell; not surprising, considering how
overrated he was, but still not equitable. McDowell's still a
very good pitcher; he just never was a truly great one.
> Who knows if Ogea repeats.
My guess is that he will; he's _never_ failed in pro ball. He's
had varying degrees of success, true - but I don't see any reason
to believe he'll be worse than Anderson in '96.
> Martinez...how far can guts alone carry him ?
My guess is that Martinez will be a half-time pitcher this year.
Anything more than that's gravy.
> That leaves Hershiser to carry them (just like in last year's
> post-season !!)
Could happen; I doubt it will, though.
Joe
|
63.1778 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Feb 20 1996 08:41 | 11 |
| > Good move by the Indians in picking up Brian Anderson. Anderson is a
> lefty, he was the third pick in the draft and was probably rushed by
> the Angels. He'll probably get sent to AAA to start the season.
> Cleveland basically gave up ZERO to get him. Anderson forced the
> Angels to make a move.
Groaner, I thought of you when I saw this in the transaction column. A
*great* pickup by the Indians. You can get rid of the "probably" in
"probably rushed" - the Angels were desperate and didn't give him time to
develop. This was one of the moves necessary to plug the holes caused by
the eventual departure of Martinez and Hershiser.
|
63.1779 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Wed Feb 28 1996 09:19 | 3 |
63.1780 | August 23, 1996 | CNTROL::CHILDS | Harry Browne for President! | Wed Feb 28 1996 09:23 | 1 |
|
|
63.1781 | Another Contest? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Wed Feb 28 1996 09:34 | 4 |
| October 28, 1996 - Indians lose to the Braves in Game 5 of the WS.
Braves win WS AGAIN.
UMDan
|
63.1782 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Feb 28 1996 10:21 | 1 |
63.1783 | never | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Field Service Tool Pusher | Wed Feb 28 1996 10:36 | 1 |
|
|
63.1784 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Feb 28 1996 10:51 | 4 |
|
August 22nd.
Joe
|
63.1785 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Feb 29 1996 08:45 | 3 |
|
September 10th. Chicago rebounds and KC is surprisingly tough. Indians
still smoke them both - they're too deep.
|
63.1786 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Feb 29 1996 09:46 | 12 |
|
> Chicago rebounds
How? With Phillips, I _might_ be able to buy the Sox as at least vague
contenders, but now? They've got Thomas, Ventura, a few pitchers who
need to bounce back and/or step forward, and little else.
> and KC is surprisingly tough.
This I can buy.
Joe
|
63.1787 | June-something... | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Feb 29 1996 09:55 | 1 |
| What day will the Indians trade a super prospect to get starting pitching ?
|
63.1788 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Feb 29 1996 09:55 | 9 |
| >> Chicago rebounds
>
> How? With Phillips, I _might_ be able to buy the Sox as at least vague
> contenders, but now? They've got Thomas, Ventura, a few pitchers who
> need to bounce back and/or step forward, and little else.
As you mentioned, the pitching will rebound. I don't expect Jason Bere to
have the kind of season he had last year, do you ? That's one example.
|
63.1789 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Feb 29 1996 10:13 | 5 |
| I didn't mean to start a discussion - it was just a short justification
for why my guess was later than the other guys'.
Rich basically summed up my take on it. And you forget about Lance Johnson
like he's a spare part - he's a nice player.
|
63.1790 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Feb 29 1996 11:13 | 23 |
|
>I didn't mean to start a discussion - it was just a short justification
>for why my guess was later than the other guys'.
It just struck me as an odd idea.
>Rich basically summed up my take on it. And you forget about Lance Johnson
>like he's a spare part - he's a nice player.
Assuming Lance Johnson is a nice player (I disagree; IMHO, while he's
not useless, he doesn't walk enough to really contribute offensively),
what good does it do the Sox? Johnson's on the Mets.
And Raines is with the Yankees.
I see the pitching for the Sox improving (while I'm unconvinced about
Bere, I expect some 2 or 3 of the Sox starters to be better this year),
but the offense slipping (unless, maybe, Snopek starts and Guillen
sits, which I don't think will happen), for an overall slightly
positive effect upon their record - which isn't nearly enough to keep
them close.
Joe
|
63.1791 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Feb 29 1996 11:16 | 5 |
| > Assuming Lance Johnson is a nice player (I disagree; IMHO, while he's
> not useless, he doesn't walk enough to really contribute offensively),
> what good does it do the Sox? Johnson's on the Mets.
DOH!
|
63.1792 | Death, taxes, and Big Frank... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Thu Feb 29 1996 11:18 | 7 |
|
White Sox are indeed on the slide... but baseball being baseball,
pitching being pitching, Frank Thomas being Frank Thomas; as
Joaquin Andujar would summarize in just one word, youneverknow...
glenn
|
63.1793 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Thu Feb 29 1996 12:20 | 15 |
63.1794 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Feb 29 1996 12:21 | 6 |
| Rumor I heard was that Jason Bere would get a look in spring training but
there's a good chance he'll start the season in AAA.
Alverez looked better 2nd half than 1st so maybe he's coming around.
George
|
63.1795 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Thu Feb 29 1996 12:22 | 4 |
63.1796 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Feb 29 1996 12:37 | 6 |
|
Question is, are they a future champion or a future Vikings/Broncos/Bills?
"" #2 ""
George
|
63.1797 | A's and Detroit come ot mind | CSLALL::BRULE | SNOW SUCKS | Thu Feb 29 1996 13:24 | 5 |
| Cleveland's second 5 starting pitchers are better then a couple of
teams first 5. When Martinez, Hersheiser and McDowell are gone in 2
years they shouldn't miss a beat.
mike
|
63.1798 | That's who | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Feb 29 1996 14:48 | 2 |
| Cleveland traded our local kid they played at first last year, name
escapes me. Who's on first this year for the tribe other than Murray?
|
63.1799 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Feb 29 1996 15:07 | 4 |
|
Franco and Perry.
Joe
|
63.1800 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Feb 29 1996 15:26 | 1 |
| local kid == Sorrento
|
63.1801 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Thu Feb 29 1996 15:57 | 4 |
63.1802 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:02 | 7 |
| Well Groaner since you're not a stat man that has to be observation.
Is this range or propensity for errors. Generally, lefties are good
fielders at first base, generalization fer sure but I've rarely seen an
exception.
Franco as a former ss, 2b should I grant be able to play and is that
the Perry that played for Atlanta circa 1991,1992?
|
63.1803 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:10 | 3 |
| Why is that people expect Franco to be a good ML hitter at his age ?
Didn't he pretty-much suck in his last stint, before going to Japan ?
JoeH, you must have some stats that identify a trend here....
|
63.1804 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:11 | 11 |
63.1805 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:13 | 3 |
63.1806 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:20 | 5 |
| Franco will be better offensively than Sorrento, but he won't be
any better defensively.
In any rate, look for Herbert Perry to win the first base job
by the end of the year (no more platooning).
|
63.1807 | Cleveland clinches 9/19 BTW | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:23 | 11 |
| > <<< Note 63.1794 by CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>
>
> Rumor I heard was that Jason Bere would get a look in spring training but
>there's a good chance he'll start the season in AAA.
Why would a guy on the all-star team two years ago get only a "look" in
spring training ? He was bad last year, but he still has a live aram (IMO),
and is unlikely to be at AAA when the season starts.
If someone like Bere is sent to the AAA level, then Chicago may not have a
realistic wild-card chance.
|
63.1808 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:26 | 13 |
| I was hoping to find a chink in the armor. Franco was very good at
Chicago and was a key to freeing up the Big Hurt for a big year. Alas,
you have indeed gotten better except for (where's that straw when I
need it) the lefty / righty thing.
Well if you don't shore up the pitching I definitely see 50 losses this
year. Actually a short series vs rested pitching and your own staff
overworked especially against two top of the line lefthanders is about
the only gambit that could or did stop Cleveland. Hart has now gone a
long way with Franco in repairing that "chink".
Did I read the Braves thinking about messing around with Avery?
Without Avery they probably would have lost the series.
|
63.1809 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:33 | 12 |
| > Franco >> Sorrento both offensively and defensively.
I know Sorrento is no Mattingly at 1B, but is he that bad/Franco that good?
Logic says that a former middle infielder *should* be good around the first
base bag, but I don't know that for a fact.
He'll hit for a much better average than Sorrento, with less home run punch.
But on the Tribe, that shouldn't be an issue.
From what little I saw, Perry seems to be the same sort of hitter as Franco -
plenty of extra base power, excellent average, but not really big home run
numbers. He's a good looking player...
|
63.1810 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:42 | 4 |
| re. Avery - The Braves aren't doing anything that I'm aware of,
although he did win his arbitration case this year.
UMDan
|
63.1811 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:42 | 10 |
|
>Why is that people expect Franco to be a good ML hitter at his age ?
>Didn't he pretty-much suck in his last stint, before going to Japan ?
>JoeH, you must have some stats that identify a trend here....
Actually, if you throw out 1992 (when he was injured, and only
managed 107 at bats), Franco's been fairly consistent, and always
very good.
Joe
|
63.1812 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:45 | 9 |
|
Re: Franco's defense
About the only evidence we have in either direction is the fact
that Franco won a Gold Glove in Japan last year.
Which probably indicates that he's not _bad_, at a minimum.
Joe
|
63.1813 | JO-EEEEEEEE-YY | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Thu Feb 29 1996 18:11 | 6 |
|
Joey Belle fined $50K for cussin' at Hannah Storm. Biggest fine ever
in MLB. The guy was a jerk in Colorado Springs and still is.
Kevin
|
63.1814 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Thu Feb 29 1996 19:41 | 6 |
63.1815 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Fri Mar 01 1996 06:54 | 5 |
|
He has already appealed the fine and I guess is waitin for it to be
settled. Paul is right Belle is a complete ASS but without a doubt
I'd want him on my team as opposed to pitch to him.
|
63.1816 | | CSLALL::BRULE | SNOW SUCKS | Fri Mar 01 1996 08:28 | 4 |
| Paul your half right. Belle isn't appealing but the Indians are going
to pay the fine.
mike
|
63.1817 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN - 1995 SPORTS NOTY Winner | Fri Mar 01 1996 08:40 | 3 |
63.1818 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Mar 01 1996 09:57 | 5 |
| > Joey Belle fined $50K for cussin' at Hannah Storm.
As I remember it, he cussed at ALL reporters in the dugout. Why is
that Hannah (ie: female) is the only one to bring these charges ?
Why weren't the male reporters offended ?
|
63.1819 | "They all look alike"-- great line on WEEI yesterday | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Fri Mar 01 1996 11:05 | 10 |
|
> As I remember it, he cussed at ALL reporters in the dugout.
No, by the accounts I've seen, Belle directed profane, female-specific
slurs at Storm. Only problem was that Belle "thought" that Storm
was Lesley Visser in disguise. Sorry Joey, you don't get points
for delusional perception problems...
glenn
|
63.1820 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Fri Mar 01 1996 12:01 | 2 |
| If it were the insipid Lesley Visser, it would be almost forgivable.
Not the female-specific slurs, just the general ones.
|
63.1821 | Ever in the right shall [BC's] sons (and daughters) be found | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Fri Mar 01 1996 12:24 | 4 |
| There you go panning BC again Roland: first me, then the Glove now the
lovely and talent Leslie Visser Stockton.
One word about Charlie O'Rourke and I'm coming over there ^
|
63.1822 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Mar 14 1996 09:25 | 15 |
|
It appears that Hargrove has settled upon the following batting
order...
Lofton - Vizquel - Baerga - Belle - Murray - Franco - Thome - Ramirez -
Alomar.
Perhaps the most interesting thing about this lineup (as pointed out
on rec.sport.baseball) is that the Indians could expect to score (a
few) more runs by running this order _backwards_.
I really like Grover, but I also really wish he'd put together a
reasonable order...
Joe
|
63.1823 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Mar 14 1996 09:32 | 4 |
|
They could run those guys inside out and they'd still lead the league.
George
|
63.1824 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | SPORTS 1995 NOTY & RED_SOX Most Knowledgeable Noter Award! | Thu Mar 14 1996 13:09 | 4 |
63.1825 | 'Course it won't matter all that much, but... | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Thu Mar 14 1996 16:19 | 5 |
| I would agree with what's been said so far. Wouldn't you want to get
Thome and Ramirez more AB's than Vizquel, or even Murray? This would
be a foolish batting order if it is, in fact, what will be used.
Steve
|
63.1826 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Mar 14 1996 16:27 | 10 |
| > Lofton - Vizquel - Baerga - Belle - Murray - Franco - Thome - Ramirez -
> Alomar.
This lineup was so poor last year for Cleveland.
It seems to be a classic lineup. Good speed leading off. Good bat control
(bunt, hit-and-run) hitting second, to move the lead-off man over.
Good RBI man with good average hitting 3rd. Two big sluggers 4th and 5th.
Good power with somewhat less predictability in the 6th and 7th (and here
in the 8th as well). Worst hitter hitting 9th.
|
63.1827 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Mar 14 1996 16:34 | 13 |
| It's the happy dilemma of too much hitting talent.
The probable reason(s) for Vizquel in the #2 slot are his ability to move
the runner over, and the ability to run Lofton without taking the bat out
of the hands of a slugger.
Sure, you'd like to move Thome and Ramirez up, but what do you do with
Eddie "I had 2 RBI before breakfast" Murray?
You could try moving Vizquel to #9 and slide everyone up a notch. Problem
is that hitting is a Baerga strength, but plate discipline isn't. But having
Valentin hit #2 works OK for the Red Sox, maybe the same applies to Baerga and
the Tribe.
|
63.1828 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Mar 14 1996 16:39 | 31 |
|
>> Lofton - Vizquel - Baerga - Belle - Murray - Franco - Thome - Ramirez -
>> Alomar.
> This lineup was so poor last year for Cleveland.
Thankfully, batting order makes relatively little difference.
> It seems to be a classic lineup. Good speed leading off. Good bat
> control (bunt, hit-and-run) hitting second, to move the lead-off man over.
Of course, you score more runs if you have the high-OBP lead off...
> Good RBI man with good average hitting 3rd. Two big sluggers 4th and 5th.
> Good power with somewhat less predictability in the 6th and 7th (and here
> in the 8th as well). Worst hitter hitting 9th.
???
The worst hitter is clearly Vizquel; Alomar's 2nd worst.
The guys who get on base the most often, and who therefore should
be coming up _before_ guys like Eddie Murray who knock 'em in, but
don't leave themselves on, and Thome and Ramirez, who are hitting
7th and 8th.
Over the course of the season, Vizquel will get ~50 more at bats
than Ramirez. Why in the _world_ would you want to take 50 at
bats away from Ramirez or Thome and give them to Vizquel?
Joe
|
63.1829 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Mar 14 1996 16:45 | 4 |
| >Why in the _world_ would you want to take 50 at
> bats away from Ramirez or Thome and give them to Vizquel?
As a reward for making the pitchers look better? :-)
|
63.1830 | Swindelled? | TNPUBS::ALVEY | my head won't leave my head alone | Mon Apr 01 1996 16:10 | 6 |
| Tribe moved Mark Clark to da Mets yesterday
for RHP Reid Cornelius and OF Ryan Thompson.
Anybody got the poop on these guys?
dr.a
|
63.1831 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Apr 01 1996 16:16 | 12 |
|
CLE Indians Pitchers W L G GS CG GF SH SV IP H R ER HR BB SO
Mark Clark 9 7 22 21 2 0 0 0 124.2 143 0 73 13 42 68
NYM Mets Batters G AB R H TB D T HR RBI BB SO SB CS E
Ryan Thompson 75 267 39 67 101 13 0 7 31 19 77 3 1 3
NORFOLK TIDES (AAA) W L ERA G SV IP H R ER BB SO
Cornelius, Reid 8 1 1.67 14 0 81.0 73 22 15 24 50
George
|
63.1832 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Mon Apr 01 1996 16:22 | 10 |
| Ryan Thompson came to the Mets with Jeff Kent from Toronto
in the David Cone trade. He has shown some pop with the bat,
but is prone to strikeouts. He was squeezed out of the Mets
outfield plans, both short and long term.
Cornelius is a minor leaguer that just got sent down. I think
the Mets may have gotten him from the Braves at some point, but
I'm not sure about that.
Mike
|
63.1833 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Mon Apr 01 1996 16:23 | 8 |
| Clark took a big step forward two years ago, and a small one backward
last year.
Thompson is a superstar in his own mind - although I'd be worried if I were
Jeromy Burnitz...
Cornelius was nothing spectacular in the little I saw of him with the Mets
last year.
|
63.1834 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Mon Apr 01 1996 16:26 | 4 |
| A search of Alta Vista shows that Cornelius came from
the Expo organization in the David Sequi trade.
Mike
|
63.1835 | damn...there goes undefeated season | TNPUBS::ALVEY | my head won't leave my head alone | Wed Apr 03 1996 08:45 | 2 |
| Tribe loses opener 7-1 to Cone/Yankees
|
63.1837 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Apr 03 1996 16:02 | 7 |
| > Get your digs in now, when Cleveland's winning at a .700 clip, the
> jokes will stop.
.700 was a very rare feat. Pulling it off back-to-back is doubtful.
I keep saying it, watch your pitching staff. MLB pitching is so
fragile these days, and your mainstays are old. One of two injuries
and you're Boston Red Sox-Central.
|
63.1839 | Flash Gordan = fire | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Thu Apr 04 1996 09:22 | 5 |
| I'm sure the Red sox wouldn't mind some of Cleveland's second 5 not to
mention Colon and Wright. Although hopefully Suppan, Orellano, Murray
and Eshelman will help them.
Mike
|
63.1840 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Apr 04 1996 10:47 | 12 |
| > chance. Cleveland could have two of their starters go down and not
> lose anything. Remember, McDowell is an addition to the staff this
> year.
McDowell stinks.
If Cleveland could replace their #1 and #2 pitchers with pitchers
currently in the minors, and not lose anything, that means that either
(a) those two replacement pitchers really should be in the majors as the
#3 and #4 starters in the rotation, or (b) Cleveland's top 7 starters
are absolutely equal and it's just a coin flip to determine who stays
and who goes.
|
63.1842 | It's a shared opinion | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 04 1996 11:17 | 4 |
| MCdowell does suck. He has a lousy ERA he was just lucky enough to be on a team
that score 6+ runs a game for him when he posted his high winning %%%%......
When the Yanks need him the most he choked! Case closed......
|
63.1843 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Apr 04 1996 11:57 | 6 |
|
McDowell is a definite step down from Ken Hill but I wouldn't
put him in the suck category yet. He is an above average pitcher on
the down side of his career.
Ron
|
63.1844 | No he's not | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 04 1996 12:05 | 0 |
63.1845 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Apr 04 1996 12:07 | 4 |
| Ron I guess you don't get it. If Mikey says the guy sips he's
probably the MVP of the staff..... 8*)
Jimbo
|
63.1846 | That's why I've never said you sip Jimbo ;^) | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 04 1996 12:08 | 0 |
63.1848 | He's on my team so now I love him | STRATA::BTOWER | | Thu Apr 04 1996 12:18 | 2 |
| Grono, If Mcdowell had not joined the Tribe, would you still want to
sleep with him? 8>). Or maybe it's because he's a stiff..............
|
63.1849 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Apr 04 1996 12:28 | 5 |
|
Actually, Paul's been a fan of McDowell's for years; I'll vouch
for that.
Joe
|
63.1850 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Apr 04 1996 12:37 | 18 |
63.1852 | Last years starters | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Thu Apr 04 1996 13:57 | 99 |
| I'll take McDowell on my team anyday. Here's last years ML pitchers with
more then 20 starts sorted by ERA
W ERA Ratio W L G GS CG
Greg Maddux 19 1.63 0.81 19 2 28 28 10
Randy Johnson 18 2.48 1.05 18 2 30 30 6
Hideo Nomo 13 2.54 1.06 13 6 28 28 4
Butch Henry 7 2.85 1.28 7 9 21 21 1
Andy Ashby 12 2.95 1.26 12 10 31 31 2
Tim Wakefield 16 2.95 1.18 16 8 27 27 6
Ismael Valdes 13 3.06 1.11 13 11 33 27 6
Dennis Martinez 12 3.08 1.18 12 5 28 28 3
Joey Hamilton 6 3.09 1.20 6 9 31 30 2
Tom Glavine 16 3.09 1.25 16 7 29 29 3
John Smoltz 12 3.18 1.24 12 7 29 29 2
Frank Castillo 11 3.21 1.23 11 10 29 29 2
Pete Schourek 18 3.22 1.07 18 7 29 29 2
David Wells 16 3.24 1.22 16 8 29 29 6
Jaime Navarro 14 3.28 1.25 14 6 29 29 1
Mike Mussina 19 3.30 1.07 19 9 32 32 7
Mike Hampton 9 3.36 1.26 9 8 24 24 0
Ken Rogers 17 3.38 1.29 17 7 31 31 3
Denny Neagle 13 3.44 1.27 13 8 31 31 5
Pat Rapp 14 3.45 1.40 14 7 28 28 3
John Smiley 12 3.47 1.20 12 5 28 27 1
Shane Reynolds 10 3.47 1.23 10 11 30 30 3
Pedro Martinez M 14 3.48 1.15 14 10 30 30 2
Tom Candiotti 7 3.50 1.29 7 14 30 30 1
Mike Morgan 7 3.57 1.27 7 7 21 21 1
David Cone 18 3.57 1.24 18 8 30 30 6
Kevin Brown 10 3.61 1.18 10 9 26 26 3
Al Leiter 11 3.64 1.48 11 11 28 28 2
Ramon Martinez 17 3.67 1.25 17 7 30 30 4
Carlos Perez 10 3.70 1.20 10 8 28 23 2
Jim Abbott 11 3.70 1.39 11 8 30 30 4
Mark Gubicza 12 3.76 1.33 12 14 33 33 3
Chris Hammond 9 3.80 1.27 9 6 25 24 3
Alex Fernandez 12 3.81 1.30 12 8 30 30 5
Mark Leiter 10 3.83 1.23 10 12 30 29 7
Orel Hershiser 16 3.88 1.21 16 6 26 26 1
Kevin Appier 15 3.89 1.21 15 10 31 31 4
Jack McDowell 15 3.94 1.33 15 10 30 30 8
Mark Petkovsek 6 4.00 1.25 6 6 26 21 1
Mark Portugal 11 4.02 1.33 11 10 31 31 1
Bobby Witt 5 4.13 1.47 5 11 29 29 2
Jim Bullinger 12 4.14 1.45 12 8 24 24 1
Kent Mercker 7 4.15 1.41 7 8 29 26 0
Andy Pettitte 12 4.17 1.41 12 9 31 26 3
Bret Saberhagen 7 4.18 1.29 7 6 25 25 3
Roger Clemens 10 4.18 1.44 10 5 23 23 0
Bobby Jones 10 4.20 1.34 10 10 30 30 3
Kevin Ritz 11 4.21 1.36 11 11 31 28 0
Chuck Finley 15 4.21 1.40 15 12 32 32 2
Erik Hanson 15 4.25 1.32 15 5 29 29 1
Dave Mlicki 9 4.27 1.34 9 7 29 25 0
John Burkett 14 4.31 1.41 14 14 30 30 4
Felipe Lira 9 4.31 1.42 9 13 37 22 0
Wilson Alvarez 8 4.32 1.51 8 11 29 29 3
Jeff Fassero 13 4.33 1.49 13 14 30 30 1
Roger Pavlik 10 4.38 1.38 10 10 31 31 2
Steve Ontiveros 9 4.39 1.41 9 6 22 22 2
Tom Gordon 12 4.43 1.55 12 12 31 31 2
Greg Swindell 10 4.47 1.43 10 9 33 26 1
Kevin Foster 12 4.52 1.28 12 11 30 28 0
Tim Belcher 10 4.52 1.54 10 12 28 28 1
Charles Nagy 16 4.55 1.43 16 6 29 29 2
Todd Stottlemyre 14 4.56 1.47 14 7 31 31 2
Bob Tewksbury 8 4.60 1.46 8 7 21 21 4
Ken Hill AL 10 4.62 1.51 10 8 30 29 1
Mark Langston 15 4.63 1.38 15 7 31 31 2
Ricky Bones 10 4.63 1.50 10 12 32 31 3
Steve Sparks 9 4.63 1.47 9 11 33 27 3
Paul Quantrill 11 4.67 1.43 11 12 33 29 0
Steve Avery 7 4.68 1.25 7 13 29 29 3
Sterling Hitchco 11 4.71 1.33 11 10 27 27 4
Doug Drabek 10 4.77 1.40 10 9 31 31 2
Andy Benes 11 4.77 1.50 11 9 31 31 1
Paul Wagner 5 4.80 1.49 5 16 33 25 3
Scott Erickson 13 4.82 1.43 13 10 32 31 7
Chris Bosio 10 4.92 1.65 10 8 31 31 0
Darryl Kile 4 4.96 1.47 4 12 25 21 0
Kevin Tapani 10 4.97 1.45 10 13 33 31 3
Pat Hentgen 10 5.12 1.63 10 14 30 30 2
Sean Bergman 7 5.13 1.75 7 10 28 28 1
Steve Trachsel 7 5.17 1.56 7 13 30 29 2
Esteban Loaiza 8 5.17 1.51 8 9 32 31 1
Mark Clark 9 5.29 1.49 9 7 22 21 2
Brad Radke 11 5.32 1.34 11 14 29 28 2
Tyler Green 8 5.33 1.59 8 9 26 25 4
Mike Harkey 8 5.45 1.59 8 9 26 20 1
Kevin Gross 9 5.55 1.58 9 15 31 30 4
Zane Smith 8 5.64 1.52 8 8 24 21 0
Shawn Boskie 7 5.67 1.37 7 7 20 20 1
Terry Mulholland 5 5.80 1.53 5 13 29 24 2
Ron Darling 4 6.23 1.63 4 7 21 21 1
Juan Guzman 4 6.33 1.66 4 14 24 24 3
Jason Bere 8 7.22 1.87 8 15 27 27 1
Mike Moore 5 7.56 1.87 5 15 25 25 1
|
63.1854 | Just like my wife, Wants more then I can give | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Thu Apr 04 1996 14:13 | 9 |
| Dear Paul,
I'm just putting the stats out there. If I had the stats for the last 5
years I'd have put it there. I don't have to adjust NOTHING. To me the
list shows Black Jack in the top 40% of the ML starting pitchers. To
say he sucks is B.S. and shows that someone isn't following the game
very well.
Hope you have a good day,
Mike
|
63.1855 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Thu Apr 04 1996 16:10 | 15 |
|
Just Jacks numbers
Year Team W ERA IP H BB Ratio SO
1993 CHI 22 3.37 256.2 261 69 1.286 158
1994 CHI 10 3.73 181.0 186 42 1.260 127
1995 NYY 15 3.93 217.2 211 78 1.328 157
Three year trend has him slipping, but still pitching reasonably well.
I'd make him the #3 starter for his ability, but move him up to #2 for
his durability. Any team in the league would be happy to have him for
the right price.
Marc
|
63.1856 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Apr 04 1996 17:00 | 13 |
|
> Just Jacks numbers
Expanded...
Year Team W ERA IP H BB Ratio SO
1991 CHI 17 3.41 253.2 212 82 1.159 191
1992 CHI 20 3.18 260.2 247 75 1.235 178
1993 CHI 22 3.37 256.2 261 69 1.286 158
1994 CHI 10 3.73 181.0 186 42 1.260 127
1995 NYY 15 3.93 217.2 211 78 1.328 157
Joe
|
63.1858 | Black Jack the Stiff!! | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 04 1996 17:17 | 1 |
| It's about time you realized the obvious...........
|
63.1862 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Apr 05 1996 14:22 | 17 |
| I haven't replied because I haven't been in here. Moreover, It'll take
a couple of days for me to get the info - I do have other things to do.
I still think he stinks (that's the adjective I chose, BTW).
> The other thing that sucks about Black Jack is that he just doesn't
> pitch enough innings. He burns out the bullpen.
The guy IS an innings horse - I'll give you that. Kinda like Tim Wakefield
in a lot of ways. He has days where he is sharp, but a lot of days where
he is awful. Extremely inconsistent. Not a guy you want as a #2 starter
when you are in a pennant race.
I'd be very happy to see McDowell pitch 3 times in a 7 game post season
series against a team I was rooting for.
|
63.1863 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Apr 05 1996 14:31 | 8 |
| > All I have to say is... when the season is over and Black Jack
> is sporting his 23-6 record and in the running for the Cy Young...
> three words... "told you so!"
If this happens, I'll be in the crow note. OTOH, If (as is more likely)
he is 13 or 14 wins and 11 defeats, I'm sure you'll have made yourself
scarce.
|
63.1864 | You are nuts... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Apr 05 1996 15:20 | 4 |
|
Black Jack is twice the pitcher Wakefield is!
|
63.1865 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | my head won't leave my head alone | Fri Apr 05 1996 15:47 | 3 |
| yabbut Chappy,
twice nuthin is still nuthin
|
63.1867 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Sun Apr 07 1996 19:49 | 3 |
| Down to the minors or down with an injury?
George
|
63.1868 | HTH | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Apr 08 1996 07:28 | 3 |
|
George he said done as in cooked.
|
63.1871 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Mon Apr 08 1996 16:44 | 19 |
|
Well I don't actually remember who were pitchers for the Yanks last
year, but here is some more fun information concerning some pitchers.
Player W L SV ERA Ratio IP
------ -- -- -- --- ----- --
Jack McDowell 15 10 0 3.93 1.33 217.2
David Cone 18 8 0 3.57 1.24 229.1
Sterling Hitchcock 11 10 0 4.70 1.33 168.1
Scott Kamieniecki 7 6 0 4.01 1.48 89.2
Andy Pettitte 12 9 0 4.17 1.41 175.0
Rick Honeycutt 5 1 2 2.96 1.08 45.2
John Wetteland 1 5 31 2.93 0.88 61.1
In my eyes, the question now becomes, are we talking just starters or
any pitcher? Jack, IMHO, was the #2 starter.
Marc
|
63.1877 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Apr 11 1996 10:19 | 10 |
| > Can someone post the list of AL pitchers who have won more games in the
> 90's than number 3/4 starter Jack McDowell?
Who gives a ***t Groaner ? Any moron can talk using historical data.
I'm predicting that he's going to be a 4.+ ERA, barely over .500 pitcher
for the Indians. He's had better than average defense behind him in at
Chi and NY. That ain't the case here. He's been bothered by nagging
injuries over the last couple of years. At his age, that should continue.
He gives up runs, we know that. If Cleveland's offense doesn't produce
like it did last year, his numbers will drop.
|
63.1879 | He doesn't "suck", but is massively overrated... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Thu Apr 11 1996 12:01 | 15 |
|
Cleveland's offense should support Black Jerk better than either
Chicago's or New York's did. As such, anything short of a 20-win
season is a "choke".
My main gripe with McDowell is that he's always been very hittable,
can't blow away the good-hitting teams and isn't particularly good
at fooling them, either. Hence, in the playoffs and big games,
teams like Toronto and Seattle have shellacked him. I challenge
the Groaner to produce the names of playoff starters in the last
5 years with worse records in championship play, 3 or more starts...
Groaner Watch, Day 1...
glenn
|
63.1880 | He did look good last. | STRATA::BTOWER | | Thu Apr 11 1996 12:26 | 4 |
| Only one game, but Black Jack did pitch very well last night. Who won?
I crashed as the 10th innning started.
Bruce
|
63.1883 | Facetiousness will get you nowhere... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Thu Apr 11 1996 12:31 | 8 |
|
> Glenn's a bonehead, day 1.
I challenge you to prove it, with supporting data! ;-)
glenn
|
63.1884 | But Jack's not the answer to Atlanta | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Apr 11 1996 12:34 | 8 |
| Baltimore won it in the 10th on a Palmeiro hit 3-2. I thought Jack
looked good and had a good fastball. I don't think anyone believes
he's a top pitcher like Cone fe but he should deliver just what
Cleveland wanted for him - a bunch of innings.
But I'd trade McDowell and Ogea straight up for Petitte in a heartbeat,
numbers to hades. Cleveland needs that true Lefty stopper to go all
the way. But I know, lefty - righty bias is 50s thinking, save it.
|
63.1885 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu Apr 11 1996 13:12 | 3 |
| > But I'd trade McDowell and Ogea straight up for Petitte in a heartbeat,
As a GM, you're a hell of a golfer...
|
63.1886 | Bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Apr 11 1996 13:15 | 3 |
|
Glen I gotta side with Groaner on this one!! :-)
|
63.1888 | Petitte is highly regarded by Las Vegas at any rate | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Apr 11 1996 14:53 | 2 |
| Don't worry Roland the Yanks would never take that trade. Ramirez and
Ogea, maybe. The main point is you can't get that kind of horse cheap.
|
63.1889 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu Apr 11 1996 14:54 | 2 |
|
Yes, but Vegas is a minor league town...
|
63.1890 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Apr 11 1996 14:56 | 3 |
|
Not when the A's are in town!!
|
63.1892 | Didn't Sox turn down Glavine | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Thu Apr 11 1996 16:46 | 8 |
| the gm that turned that down should be shot not fired. That's
information that Hart had better hope get's forgotten. You are correct
about the Indians leverage to come - their timing was impeccable in
having the waggon in place to ensure sellouts to ensure the money to
keep buy the key fa's.
I know you don't think they need them but who, if any, are the lefty
starters this year?
|
63.1893 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Apr 11 1996 16:55 | 17 |
|
The Tribe's starters this year are Martinez, McDowell, Hershiser,
Nagy, and Ogea, all righties. In the system, Anderson and Whitten
are the top lefty prospects; Lopez, Wright, and Colon the top
righty prospects.
Thoughts:
1) When picking starters, I'd take a better righty over a lesser
lefty every time, even if it means all the starters are right
handed. I'd prefer a balance, though, when deciding between
equals.
2) I like Pettite; I might trade Ogea for him, and I really like
Ogea. But there's no way I'd even consider trading Ramirez for him.
Joe
|
63.1895 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Apr 12 1996 09:13 | 6 |
| So what's going on with Eric Plunk?
The paper had his ERA around 27.0. Granted it's early in the year but he
seems to be having problems every time out. Is he fighting an injury?
George
|
63.1897 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Apr 12 1996 11:22 | 4 |
|
Albert Belle turns down a 5 yr, 38 million dollar contract.
Ron
|
63.1898 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Fri Apr 12 1996 15:52 | 7 |
| It has been pretty much a rule among GMs not to trade Field for
pitchers dating back to Broglio - Brock and Pappas Robinson. Of course
Sox fans rebut with Lyle for Cater, Wilson for Demeter.
Funny that there was a willingness on the Yanks part, seemingly, to
trade Petitte at one time. Perhaps Ramirez will be the keeper and
Belle will go to free agency.
|
63.1899 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Apr 12 1996 16:45 | 4 |
|
I'd rather keep Ramirez, if forced to choose.
Joe
|
63.1901 | indians vs redsox.....1-0 | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Sat Apr 13 1996 17:05 | 5 |
|
Can we get a score of the game please???
|
63.1902 | ?? | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Sat Apr 13 1996 17:21 | 2 |
|
Last i heard it was 9-2 in the 8th.......indians.
|
63.1903 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Apr 15 1996 10:01 | 3 |
| >SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR
It lives!
|
63.1906 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Apr 16 1996 11:49 | 6 |
|
WAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
GO TRIBE!
|
63.1908 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Apr 16 1996 12:53 | 1 |
| Gawd Paul, I hope yer not holding yer breath or anything....
|
63.1909 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Tue Apr 16 1996 16:08 | 6 |
| What a shock! The Indians thump the Red Sox and the trolls
all come crawling out from under their bridges.
billl
|
63.1911 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Apr 22 1996 10:15 | 1 |
| George, do you have that "dead horse" sound effect ready?
|
63.1912 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Apr 22 1996 10:32 | 10 |
|
I've always liked Jack McDowell so somehow my heart isn't in cranking up the
horse sound. Maybe I just like pitchers who play guitar or maybe it is because
he was good to one of my Rotisserie teams for a few years.
One thing for sure, when he left Chicago the rest of the White Sox pitching
staff seemed to lose track of the strike zone completely. No one has been able
to step up as staff Ace since McDowell left.
George
|
63.1913 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Apr 22 1996 10:58 | 8 |
| > I've always liked Jack McDowell so somehow my heart isn't in cranking up the
>horse sound.
Jack McDowell isn't the problem... :-)
Got to give him credit - I don't believe I've *ever* seen him have a start
like this. You knew he'd pick up a bunch of wins, but the low ERA really
surprises me - he's always been a mid- to high-threes kind of guy.
|
63.1914 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Apr 22 1996 11:42 | 5 |
|
He probably still _is_ a mid-threes ERA guy, just off to a good start.
I'll be extremely impressed if his ERA ends up below 3.00...
Joe
|
63.1916 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 23 1996 13:11 | 2 |
|
It was....
|
63.1917 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 23 1996 13:12 | 4 |
|
A Terrible...
|
63.1918 | 1918 Snarf!!!! 78 years and counting | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 23 1996 13:13 | 8 |
|
YEAR!!!!!!
|
63.1920 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Apr 23 1996 15:50 | 3 |
|
Why don't you guys get a room to swap spit and talk bad about my Sox.
|
63.1921 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 23 1996 16:06 | 6 |
|
We don't need to thats why we use this forum!! :-)
Chap
|
63.1925 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Apr 25 1996 12:43 | 12 |
|
GROAn a couple questions for ya. Can you answer them??
1. Who the only team in the AL with a winning record over Cleveland for
the past two years?
2. Other than Atlanta Who has the best winning percentage at the
mistake called the Jake?
Chap
|
63.1926 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 25 1996 13:46 | 8 |
|
man the depths that Yankeeme fans will stoop too to gloss over the abmysal
failures of the Yankees over the last decade and half are amazing.......
Does anyone have Edgar Martinez's playoff stats against the Yanks last year
handy???????
;^)
|
63.1929 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Apr 25 1996 14:29 | 12 |
|
Yo Groan.
I don't wager cash. It's against Digital Policy. Right 'Saw.
Yeah Mike what has your team done in the past 15 years? 78 years?
I asked you about the same wager as last year. Who gets farther but
you ascared!!
Chap
|
63.1930 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 25 1996 14:59 | 5 |
| Chappy you have me confused with a Soxs' fan. I root for the Indians although
not with the feverish pitch of Joe, Paul or Hal. Checkout my note in the
introduction note for reference.
mike
|
63.1931 | Mike=Rocketman | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Thu Apr 25 1996 15:27 | 8 |
|
The only person Mike Cheers for is his idol...Roger "Rocket" Clemens...
He used to cheer for Wade Boggs till he found out he was a sexaholic
and left the Beantown Bums for the Yanks.....
**^) /westy
|
63.1932 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Apr 25 1996 16:02 | 13 |
|
Ok Mike I'll ask again.
What has your team done in the past 15 years. Lots of rings on them
fingers huh?
I've been civil with you tribe fans (Groaner excluded) so why you
attack me bro???
Chap
|
63.1933 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu Apr 25 1996 16:34 | 1 |
| cause I hate the Yankees...........nothing more nothing less
|
63.1935 | Alzeimers???? (sp) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Apr 25 1996 17:01 | 9 |
|
Depends how I feel at that precise moment?
What monetary amount did I mention last year?
Chap
|
63.1937 | GO TRIBE!!! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Apr 26 1996 11:55 | 12 |
|
Can someone tell me who won the game between the Tribe and the
Yank'ems??? Some detail would be nice. Anyone hit a homer?
Who got the win? Who got the loss? The box score would be
nice also.
Thanks much in advance!
W A H O O O O O O O O O O O
|
63.1938 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Fri Apr 26 1996 12:15 | 6 |
| Looks like the latest rains have turned over some
old moldy rocks.
billl
|
63.1939 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Apr 26 1996 12:23 | 5 |
|
Only saw highlights, the Tribe won 4-3 on a Albert Belle solo
HR in the 8th.
Ron
|
63.1940 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Apr 26 1996 13:06 | 9 |
| Had to love the way that Warner Wolf referred to Albert Belle this morning on
Imus. Something like:
The Indians beat the Yankees on a home run by "The Last Angry
Man" Albert Belle.
Made me smile, even though I was only half awake....
|
63.1941 | not for long!!! | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Fri Apr 26 1996 13:13 | 6 |
|
Welcome back Hal, it took a victory over the Yankees to get you back??
what are they 1-3 vs them this year?? You'll go back in hiding when
the knicks beat your caviar team???
/westy
|
63.1942 | Pseudo fan extaordinaire!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Apr 26 1996 13:35 | 3 |
|
Climb back under the Rock Hal!!
|
63.1943 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Apr 26 1996 14:17 | 16 |
|
Boy, look what happens when someone asks a simple question....all
the Yank'em lovers come out of the closet. You can't hold the
Tribe back this year...its only a matter of time. The hitting
is getting better every game. Looks like Eddie M. has broken out
of his slump. Everyone in the lineup is smacking the ball around.
The ump the night before pissed Albert off and he popped it out
last night. The guy is awsome! Too bad he gets such a bad rap!
He just does what each one of us wish we could really do. Ya know.
Someone pisses you off.....throw a ball at em and see if he leaves
you alone. Funny guy!
Go Tribe!!!
W A H O O
|
63.1944 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Apr 26 1996 14:29 | 11 |
| Well, the Yankees/Indians battle doesn't really matter at this point. The
Indians should win their division easily and the Yankees are probably the 2nd
most likely team to make the playoffs with either the Eastern division or the
Wild Card.
Once they are in the playoffs who knows? That's a relatively short series
a relatively long way away. Maybe even the A.L.C.S. if it works out that way.
It will be chilly again by the time this battle matters.
George
|
63.1945 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri Apr 26 1996 14:45 | 9 |
| > He just does what each one of us wish we could really do. Ya know.
> Someone pisses you off.....throw a ball at em and see if he leaves
> you alone.
I think I'm safe in saying that this is not what "each one of us" wishes we
could really do.
No doubt that the guy is an awesome ballplayer. But he really needs help
in dealing with all the baggage that comes along with it.
|
63.1946 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Apr 26 1996 14:55 | 7 |
|
Ya some twelve year old pisses ya off run em down with your car.
what a humanitarian.
Chap
|
63.1948 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Fri Apr 26 1996 15:32 | 5 |
|
Given his exploits in the field I'd hardly call Albert Belle an awesome
baseball player. Awesome hitter yes, ballplayer no.......
mike
|
63.1949 | 6 - 3 TRIBE OVER THE JAYS | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Sat Apr 27 1996 10:03 | 24 |
|
The Tribe wins again........
Oral gets the win in a great effort...something like 8 K's and no
walks in 7 innings.
Jose Mesa gets another save...#8 in 8 tries.
Everyone is hitting!!!
Kenny Loften steals another base....something like 16 now.
Could he steal one a game...
Franco is going crazy........the hits keep comming!!!
This team will go all the way this year! There is no stopping
the Indians when they are on the war path!
W A H O O
|
63.1950 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Apr 29 1996 09:45 | 6 |
| > Oral gets the win in a great effort...
Hal, are you giving out hidden messages?
Hershiser is amazing - three years ago I thought it was time to stick a
fork in him...
|
63.1951 | Petitte could mean championship for tribe | AKOCOA::BREEN | You never can tell | Mon Apr 29 1996 10:06 | 12 |
| I see Ogea is back to the bullpen. Some knucklehead awhile back was
comparing him to Petitte. The latter did get taken south by Albert but
is one of the best in the game.
Given the real knucklehead in charge of the Yankees I'd think the
Indians would make a run for Petitte since winning the World Series is
now the major goal and the Tribe has some excellent prospects to offer.
Groaner, make the Yankees an offer they can't refuse - what would you
trade (for a world series in 1996).
Or do you want to wait another 25 years
|
63.1952 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Apr 29 1996 10:40 | 1 |
| I'm the knucklehead who said he's better than Pettitte.
|
63.1954 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Apr 29 1996 11:05 | 4 |
| Well, you are a knucklehead, but in this particular case, I am the
knucklehead in question.
Does that clear it up? :-)
|
63.1955 | Always a Yankees fan!! | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Mon Apr 29 1996 11:37 | 11 |
|
Groaner, me a Red Sox fan, I'd rather be castrated....I hate the SOX
When Buckner made the error to blow the game in the series I bought
drinks for everyone.....I'm offered Sox tickets all the time and refuse
them, the last 3 times I went to Fenway it was to see the YANKEES and
ouch I did go to see CLevescum last year cause the seats were great.
And they were "FREE".....I even changed my Little League team from the
White Sox to the Yankees............Yanks fan forever and always....
/westy
|
63.1957 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Apr 29 1996 11:57 | 6 |
| FWIW, Knucklehead was a puppet who hung out with Jerry Mahoney.
Paul Winchell was his creator....
That's your trivia tidbit for today....
|
63.1958 | I'd have to see it, to believe it! | CNTROL::SALMON | | Mon Apr 29 1996 12:40 | 5 |
| re: -1955
Kevin, you bbought drinks?
C'mon!
|
63.1959 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Apr 29 1996 12:42 | 3 |
| >That's your trivia tidbit for today....
"Trivia" is a very appropriate term for it.
|
63.1960 | | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys Champs Again | Mon Apr 29 1996 13:49 | 7 |
| re.1958
John I'd have to see it to believe it too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tom
|
63.1961 | JJ & Tom, always order doubles | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Mon Apr 29 1996 14:04 | 10 |
|
Yes..I bought drinks, Wow you know if you guys didn't order a pitcher
and drank just a bottle I'd probably buy more.....but you guys would
cost me a bundle to drink with......
O'groaner, be nice I'm from that wonderful town of CLINTON also and
proud of it.......
/westy
|
63.1963 | love it or leave it and you did | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Mon Apr 29 1996 17:16 | 9 |
|
But it was full when it went in, they loved the town so much everyone
stayed......more than I can say for Cleveland.....you'd probably get
mugged, robbed or shot if you were in that city.....
No wonder you left, just like the Browns, must be a scumtown.
/westy
|
63.1965 | love it or leave and you did | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Tue Apr 30 1996 08:50 | 7 |
|
First of all, who would want to be there, the only thing good to come
from there has been Hal!!!
He's the true Cleveland fan.......
|
63.1967 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Apr 30 1996 09:23 | 12 |
| Hey! "Knucklehead" is not a term that should be thrown around lightly...
I hate to get back to the subject, but:
WHAT HAPPENED TO CHAD OGEA?
The guy is still young and has gone from being a solid pitcher to a guy who
can't get anyone out. It's not as if he's a junk-baller. Anyone have a clue?
The only time I've seen him pitch this year is against the Red Sox.
It's not as if he's killing my Rotisserie team because my pitching sips with
or without him...
|
63.1968 | Love your stats!!! | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Tue Apr 30 1996 09:26 | 7 |
|
27 times more friendly, thats a lie, just ask Albert Belle!!!
He's really friendly......I know must be the eastern shore fans that
piss him off??
*^/Westy
|
63.1969 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 30 1996 09:34 | 9 |
|
27 times more friendly?
Is that because most of them are related?
Chap
|
63.1970 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Apr 30 1996 09:50 | 13 |
|
Re: Ogea
Injured - he went on the DL Sunday. Given that he wasn't overused
last year (or this year), I'm not terribly worried about it at
present.
Re: Belle
Belle is from Louisiana (or Alabama, I'm not sure which), not
Cleveland.
Joe
|
63.1971 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Apr 30 1996 10:42 | 14 |
| I've been to Cleveland.
I wasn't in town long, but while I was it seemed like a nice enough place.
Paul is right, most folks outside of New England area are a little more
friendly (I wouldn't necessarily say 27 times, because every area has its share
of assholes.)
But I've met some awfully friendly folks in New England too.
People are people, no matter where you're from....
'Saw
|
63.1972 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Apr 30 1996 10:46 | 9 |
|
> Only problem is, the people in the midwest are about 27
> times more friendly than the people in the East.
Are you our official "midwest" representative?
glenn
|
63.1974 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Apr 30 1996 14:57 | 11 |
|
Obviously all of our statements are just opinions, but speaking as
someone who talks to customer from all over the US, Mexico and Canada,
my opinion is that New York is the worst (we call it 212 tude here at
the CSC) with both coasts not being overly friendly.
The middle and south easily have the friendliest people I hear each
day.
Marc
|
63.1975 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 30 1996 15:17 | 13 |
|
Well I've lived in Mass 25 years (ok) Chicago 8 months (unfriendly)
Mississippi/Alabama 5 months (very unfriendly especially to Mass accents
and other races) Virginia 2 years (Very friendly) New York off and on
(very friendly).
So I guess it all counts on your personality and disposition.
Chappy
|
63.1978 | !978 | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Apr 30 1996 16:50 | 3 |
|
It was a very good year!
|
63.1981 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed May 01 1996 08:04 | 3 |
| OK who saved the deleted notes, and who was involved?????
Jimbo
|
63.1982 | WHO WON THE GAME?????DAAAAAAAAA! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu May 02 1996 10:39 | 8 |
|
Anyone have the stats for last nights game??? Who was the winning
pitcher? Anyone hit any home runs???
Thanks so much in advance....
The Chief,
W A H O O !
|
63.1983 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 02 1996 11:06 | 5 |
|
McDowell, the stiff won. He's 3-1 now.
Look for the tribe to finish off the sweep tonight. After starting off
slow at 4-5, they are now nearing .700 ball for the season.
|
63.1984 | A L B E R T B E L L E 10 HOME RUNS!!! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu May 02 1996 12:06 | 13 |
|
What about those batting averages.....there are 5 guys with over
.300!!!!
No question who is the best in the Central!!!
The Tribe!
The Chief,
W A H O O ! ! !
|
63.1985 | C L E V E L A N D R O C K S | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri May 03 1996 09:51 | 8 |
|
CLEVELAND ROCKS SEATTLE
Game suspended....
|
63.1986 | | PHHSS1::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Fri May 03 1996 18:16 | 3 |
| Maybe Ken Behring was right about earthquakes in seattle.
|
63.1987 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 09 1996 15:10 | 6 |
|
Looks like the Yankmees season is over with Cone gone for the season.
Sure, they may win the AL lEAST, but they will have no chance to beat
Cleveland in the playoffs. It'll be ironic when Cleveland beats the
Yankmees in the playoffs with a Black Jack clinching victory (and yes,
it'll probably be a sweep or 4-1 at worst!)
|
63.1988 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu May 09 1996 15:37 | 6 |
| re .1987:
Another gem that would look good on a fried crow sammich.
billl
|
63.1989 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Better days are coming bye and bye. BS | Thu May 09 1996 15:49 | 1 |
| What's the status of Key. I'd trade a healthy Key for a lost Cone.
|
63.1990 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 09 1996 16:01 | 5 |
| Key is struggling along at 1-3 with a 6.578 ERA. There have been reports that
he's been tired and at one point they delayed one of his starts a couple days
to see if the extra rest would help.
George
|
63.1991 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Thu May 09 1996 16:12 | 2 |
|
Yeah but Bill the price of serving that Crow is much too high!!!!!!!
|
63.1992 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu May 09 1996 16:30 | 7 |
|
Key actually has been pitching better of late. Groaner put a P_name
bet on that. If they both get there. Read my Lips!
THE YANKEES OWN THE INDIANS!!!!!!!
|
63.1993 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 09 1996 18:32 | 6 |
|
I offered you the better record bet - you declined.
I offered you the who would go further - you declined.
What wager are you proposing now?
|
63.1994 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri May 10 1996 08:48 | 6 |
|
Never mind.
I was reminded yesterday by a couple of people about your welching
last year. So I'll pass!
|
63.1995 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 10 1996 09:51 | 2 |
|
I welched last year?
|
63.1996 | Not to me | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri May 10 1996 10:02 | 7 |
|
Glad to see you admitted it.
> I welched last year.
|
63.1997 | Heheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheh | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | | Fri May 10 1996 10:55 | 6 |
|
Hehehehehehehehehehheheheheheheheheheheheheh!
|
63.1998 | AND HE EXPLODES FOR ANOTHER ONE... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri May 10 1996 11:02 | 11 |
|
Albert hit his 13th of the season the other day!!! A 3 run shot!
Anyone see the article in SI on Albert???
TICK....TICK.....TICK.......T I C K ! ! ! !
|
63.1999 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri May 10 1996 11:09 | 5 |
| >AND HE EXPLODES FOR ANOTHER ONE...
Another temper tantrum?
I do see an endorsement opportunity for Albert - the US Postal Service...
|
63.2000 | Indian snarf... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri May 10 1996 11:09 | 0 |
63.2001 | TICK....TICK....TICK....T I C K ! ! ! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri May 10 1996 11:20 | 10 |
|
If you read the article about Albert, you may think differntly
about him. This could have all started from an incident many years
ago in college days. I honestly can't blame him for not trusting
anyone....
WAHOO!
|
63.2002 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri May 10 1996 11:29 | 19 |
| > If you read the article about Albert, you may think differntly
> about him.
Hal, I've read *many* articles about him, many in national publications,
some as wire feeds to the Globe (i.e. not written here), others by the
Globe writers.
Granted, the guy does a lot of good things for charity. He also has a
right to a certain amount of privacy. I'd probably love to sit down, have
a couple of beers with him, and listen to him talk baseball (and hitting in
particular). But he has to learn that violence is not an appropriate
reaction to situations that are not to his liking. He's not the only player
who needs to learn the lesson, but he's at the top of the list.
I don't care what happened in college - you don't try and run kids down with
a car. You don't scream epithets at a reporter doing their job in the dugout,
and you don't drill a photographer for taking pictures.
Your "TICK...TICK...TICK..." title is extremely appropriate.
|
63.2003 | What will John Hart do? | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Fri May 10 1996 11:47 | 8 |
| Now that Belle's negotiations for a long term contract seem to have broken
down for good, I'm reading in a number of places that Indians' management is
starting to wonder if $7+ million a year isn't better invested in a left fielder
AND a pitcher, especially since Albert seems to want to test the market.
Belle's PR problems are said to have something to do with this attitude.
Steve
|
63.2004 | Read the article then come back in here... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri May 10 1996 11:49 | 9 |
|
Ok, you may say that what happened many years ago doesn't matter
anymore but.....lets look at what happened.
Joey was in the dugout and some fan screems that he is a niger...
He expects something to be done about it. He actually tried looking
fan up but had no luck. From what was said, nothing was ever done
about it. To Albert, it was not right! There's lots more to the story
but how would you feel????? It started there.
|
63.2005 | Give him time! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri May 10 1996 11:50 | 6 |
|
Albert wants to be the highest paid player in the league...the
numbers say he should be...He'll sign with the Tribe. Cleveland
won't let him go!
wahooooo
|
63.2006 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri May 10 1996 12:12 | 14 |
| > Albert wants to be the highest paid player in the league...
Yes...
> the numbers say he should be...
No, they don't. _Maybe_ in a one or two year contract. But to
sign Belle to a long-term, $8 million a year deal at age 30 is
extremely risky; I wouldn't do it. I'd rather see Giles or Burnitz
out there next year, more money available for other areas, and a couple
of extra draft picks (Belle _is_ a good player to sign up for
arbitration with; no matter what happens, you win).
Joe
|
63.2007 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Fri May 10 1996 13:47 | 5 |
| The tribe would be better off getting Barry Bonds to play LF (he
should be cheaper than Belle). Minus
his attitude, I still think he is of the best players in the game
(better than Belle). He can field well, hits for average, has speed and
power. Not too much of a clutch hitter in the playoffs though 8^(.
|
63.2008 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri May 10 1996 13:50 | 4 |
| Speaking of which, Mr. Bonds shoved Rod Beaton of USA Today in the
clubhouse the other day while Beaton was there to interview someone else.
Barry was probably upset it wasn't him being interviewed...
|
63.2009 | sorry but... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri May 10 1996 14:09 | 5 |
| >Speaking of which, Mr. Bonds shoved Rod Beaton of USA Today in the
>clubhouse the other day while Beaton was there to interview someone else.
Rod Beaton probably deserved it. Just based on the tone of his writing
he seems like someone who would get on a player's nerves.
|
63.2010 | | BSS::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Mon May 13 1996 18:35 | 4 |
| Nah, he pushed him that day 'cause he had to mail another alimony
check that probably about drained his account(-)
Tim
|
63.2011 | 5-1 right now... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 17 1996 08:55 | 5 |
|
Which clown was telling me that Black Jack was a 13-11 pitcher on the
Indians this year?
|
63.2012 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri May 17 1996 09:39 | 12 |
| > -< 5-1 right now... >-
>
>
> Which clown was telling me that Black Jack was a 13-11 pitcher on the
> Indians this year?
Well, it wasn't me, but I'd assume there's still enough time for him to
go 8-10 the rest of the way?
|
63.2013 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 17 1996 12:46 | 4 |
|
The only way Black Jack goes 8-10 the rest of the way is if he gets
traded to the Tigers and pitches all 18 games v.s. the Indians!
|
63.2014 | ANOTHER SWEEP! THIS MAKES WHAT? 4 SWEEPS? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri May 17 1996 13:51 | 19 |
|
Big night for Albert yesterday....2 shots and he takes the HR lead!
Terible thing the commish did to him though. I really don't think
its very fair at all! Lets see what the commish does to that
Phillips guy from the White Sox...
Eddie smacked a dinger yesterday too. Good to see!
Carlos Bierga appears to still be having trouble behind the
plate...watch out when he pulls out though....this lineup is
awsome!
Not too sure that Black Jack could go 8-10 against the tribe
though...The Indians only need 1 or 2 shots against a new guy
before the scalping begins!
The Chief,
WAHOO!
|
63.2015 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri May 17 1996 13:58 | 3 |
| Black Jack was great during Aug and Sep last year. He sucked from
Apr-Jul (remember "Jack The Flipper" ?). And we all know how well
he pitched in the playoffs.... :^(
|
63.2016 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri May 17 1996 14:31 | 14 |
| > Terible thing the commish did to him though. I really don't think
> its very fair at all! Lets see what the commish does to that
> Phillips guy from the White Sox...
The commissioner may not need to do anything. Phillips may be brought up
on assault charges. Of course, he didn't do anything to Belle, either - the
AL president did.
I think that it was pretty appropriate. Supposedly, one of the conditions
coming out of his last run-in was that he seek counseling, and it appears he
hasn't been following up on this.
The stuff about community service was grandstanding, though - I've heard that
Belle already does a substantial amount of that to begin with.
|
63.2017 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 17 1996 15:08 | 4 |
|
I'm really crushed that Justice is probably lost for the season. I
guess that will be one of the many excuses used when the Braves fail
to repeat this year.
|
63.2018 | Can't hit good pitching? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Fri May 17 1996 15:18 | 5 |
| And what excuse will the Tribe trot out? One of the ones they used in
1995, no doubt?
UMDan
|
63.2019 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 17 1996 17:58 | 7 |
|
No excuses will be needed, Tribe will win it all easily. Atlanta's
excuse will also include that their hitting sucked so bad that their
self-proclaimed all world pitching couldn't bail them out.
What really makes me sad is that the Indians won't even get to beat
the Braves in the WS - Atlanta will be watching from home.
|
63.2020 | some folks just never learn | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Fri May 17 1996 18:46 | 7 |
| Is it me or did we hear this same foul stench spewing
forth regarding the Browns/Ravens and the Steelers last
fall?
billl
|
63.2021 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 17 1996 23:57 | 3 |
|
Yes, you were the one talking about how the Steelers were going all
the way. We all know what happened.
|
63.2022 | 1996 projected standings - based on Home and Road W/L percentages | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue May 21 1996 14:19 | 20 |
| -ACTUAL- ---Home-- ---Road-- ===PROJECTED===
W L W L W L W L
=== === === === === === === ===
New York 24 16 16 7 8 9 94.5 67.5
Baltimore 24 18 15 9 9 9 91.1 70.9
Toronto 20 23 9 10 11 13 75.5 86.5
Boston 17 24 12 10 5 14 65.5 96.5
Detroit 12 33 6 12 6 21 45 117
Cleveland 28 13 14 4 14 9 112. 49.7
Chicago 24 18 11 5 13 13 96.2 65.8
Milwaukee 21 20 10 10 11 10 82.9 79.1
Minnesota 18 24 11 12 7 12 68.6 93.4
Kansas Cit 19 26 8 13 11 13 68.0 94.0
Texas 27 16 18 7 9 9 98.8 63.2
Seattle 22 20 13 11 9 9 84.4 77.6
Oakland 20 22 10 12 10 10 77.3 84.7
California 20 23 13 8 7 15 75.9 86.1
|
63.2023 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Tue May 21 1996 14:28 | 1 |
| Busy day huh, Groaner?
|
63.2024 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue May 21 1996 14:39 | 4 |
|
Hey, for all his faults, at least he ran the BNBAL stats on time.
George
|
63.2025 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue May 21 1996 15:58 | 8 |
|
Groan figure out how with that record the tribe loses to the Yanks
in 5 games???
Chap
|
63.2026 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 12:39 | 10 |
|
Chappy, always willing to flap the lip, but never willing to wager.
Problem is, Chappy wouldn't make the wager last year either, because
his offer last year only took effect if Cleveland and NY played in
the playoffs. This is the polite way of saying that his team -
the Yanks suck, and won't even make it that far. What is the Yanks
record v.s. the Indians this year, and where were the games played?
|
63.2027 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 12:47 | 11 |
|
I lost a wager to you last year it was for who went
farther....Hello???
I offered you the same this year but you want the better record
stipulation instead???
Whats wrong with your memory Groan?
|
63.2028 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 12:54 | 5 |
|
No, I wanted who went further, you said you'd only wager on who won
if they met in the playoffs. If the Yankees are better, explain to
me why they wouldn't have a better record at the end of the season?
|
63.2029 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 12:58 | 10 |
|
You see the Yankees have a thing called rivalries in the AL east.
When we play Boston/Baltimore/Toronto its very hard to sweep these
teams because we all get way up for these games. Cleveland on the other
hand don't have any rivalries to speak of. Minnesota? Milwaukee?
Puuleeeaasse.
Like you've said whenever it benefits you. "lokk at the head to
head record baby"
|
63.2030 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 13:02 | 20 |
|
Why would I have this P_name last year Groaner?? I tell you these
dellusions you have are clouding your memory???
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 45.1196 New York Yankee Note 1196 of 1544
WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Cleveland Indians a great team " 4 lines 20-OCT-1995 15:32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well with friends like that.....
|
63.2031 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 22 1996 13:56 | 12 |
| Don't all the teams play the same number of games against teams inside and
outside their division? Seems Cleveland should be playing Baltimore and Toronto
just as many times as the Yanks play them.
Of course when interleague play comes along that will impact the teams in
different divisions. Imagine if one AL division had to play games against the
Expos, Braves, and other NL East teams while another division got to play the
Astros, Cubs and other NL Central teams.
Interleague play, shake and blend.
George
|
63.2032 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 13:57 | 3 |
|
Actually, Cleveland will play more games v.s. AL East teams than the
Yankees this year...
|
63.2033 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 22 1996 14:00 | 4 |
| Is that just because the Yankees don't have to play themselves or do the
Indians play more games against the other A.L. East teams than the Yankees?
George
|
63.2034 | READ MY LIPS RIVALRIES!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 14:01 | 7 |
|
Do you think the Red sox will be up for Cleveland come september
when they are 18 out? NO! Will they get up for the Yanks? Yes! Same
for Toronto etc...
Chap
|
63.2035 | :-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 14:03 | 3 |
|
The Red Sox play against themselves every night!
|
63.2036 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 14:03 | 5 |
|
DA FACTS!
Chappy says - "Rivalries, that's why NY won't have a better record"
Reality - CLEVELAND HAS A BETTER TEAM.
|
63.2037 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 22 1996 14:28 | 8 |
|
> The Red Sox play against themselves every night!
Better than playing with themselves, a la David Cone...
glenn
|
63.2038 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 22 1996 14:44 | 30 |
| Right now it appears the Indians do have the better team. New York looked
good on paper but to get back to the Indian's level their pitchers ERAs have to
come down from the stratosphere.
Doc Gooden is doing a good one man job of making that happen but somehow
despite the warms feelings these days toward Doc I'm sure there are plenty of
New Yorkers dreading the sound of the clock striking 12 when ever Doc takes
the mound.
Meanwhile, however, the Braves are on a roll. They are now in 1st place in
the NL East and According to USA Today they are 4-0 without Justice in right
field. When Justice went on the DL the Braves called up Jermaine Dye from
AAA Richmond and he became the 71st player in the history of major league
ball to hit a home run his 1st at bat. I saw him pinch hit Monday and he flew
out to center but it was a screaming line drive. They are saying he will
platoon in right with Dwight Smith until Jerome Walton is healthy.
The Indians still know who they have to beat to take home the World Series
Trophy.
PUM ... PUM
PUM PUM
PUM ... PUM
PUM
PUM
GO BRAVES !!!
George
|
63.2039 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 14:51 | 7 |
|
C'mon Glenn you mean to tell me you've never whacked off?
Get serious
|
63.2040 | Woops forgot the | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 14:52 | 3 |
|
:-)
|
63.2041 | Next time could we have a euphemism? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 22 1996 15:04 | 12 |
|
> C'mon Glenn you mean to tell me you've never whacked off?
Not in the bullpen... gawd man, take it to the clubhouse at least...
You're just so suave sometimes, Chappy. Too much time in those Yankee
Stadium bleachers (that's near the bullpens for those not familar) has
left you with the most refined social graces.
glenn
|
63.2042 | :-0 | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 15:18 | 13 |
|
Whacking/Playing its all the same.
No one was suppose to be there man. He thought he had privacy. I
mean how much more private can you get than a 56,000 seat stadium that
was suppose to be empty.
Besides he may have just been adjusting his "ATHLETIC SUPPORTER" jock
Suave does what theres does for alot less.
|
63.2043 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 15:18 | 6 |
|
Atlanta is also in first place with a schedule that has been heavy on
home games - and Atlanta is a .500 team on the road.
I will no longer address Indians comments made by bandwagon jumping
fans.
|
63.2044 | For you bandwagon jumpers | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 22 1996 15:19 | 3 |
|
Atlanta up 5-0 Tommy G on the mound.
|
63.2045 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 22 1996 15:27 | 24 |
|
Will Joey hit 61 this year?
I read the SI article on Belle, and in this article's assessment,
Belle's irrational behavior stems from his mother's very strong
influences and likewise angry outlook on life, more than anything.
It's a bit too convenient to believe that all of Belle's misdirected
anger is derived from a single racial epithet he heard after
striking out once in college. No one including his college coach
believes that this is the reason he must berate Hannah Storm, fire
baseballs at an innocent photographer, etc. Nor his friends, and
teammates...
As for Tony Phillips, sure, he may be suspended (personally I don't
think he should be), but at least he exacted his revenge upon the
source of the problem. I don't know the details but if Phillips
at least afforded the guy the opportunity to defend himself, then
the jerk got what he was asking for. Phillips left the game, took
off the uniform and reverted to civilian status, which is where
the matter should be handled.
glenn
|
63.2046 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 15:56 | 4 |
|
Phillips shouldn't be suspended, yet you advocated suspension for
Belle as a result of the Halloween incident, didn't you?
|
63.2047 | I think that is what pissed him off..forever! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed May 22 1996 16:36 | 5 |
|
Yea.....what Paul said!
WaHooooo!
|
63.2048 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 22 1996 16:56 | 18 |
|
> Phillips shouldn't be suspended, yet you advocated suspension for
> Belle as a result of the Halloween incident, didn't you?
No... I merely suggested a trick-or-treat party at my house, in lieu
of jailtime. It _is_ pretty sad that a $6M/year athlete is too big
to put out candy for the neighborhood kids, however. Most of us,
having once been adolescents ourselves, understand the consequences,
which usually do not involve being run down by a car.
No matter. In due time, if Belle's bizarre behavior continues, it
won't be the Indians or baseball that pays the price, but Belle
himself. Someday someone will decide that it's not just wahoo funny
and that person will _own_ Albert Belle and his next $35M.
glenn
|
63.2049 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 17:13 | 12 |
|
No... what you've done is taken the media's account of the Belle
incident and formed an opinion. You have no idea what really
happened yet you make judgements based on your perception of
reality.
Did Belle refuse to give candy? Maybe he ran out. Even if he
did refused to give out candy, does that give the people the right
to vandalize his property?
It _is_ pretty sad that an adult can be controlled so completely
by today's media.
|
63.2050 | No doubt Albert was manipulated into tirade... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 22 1996 17:20 | 9 |
|
> It _is_ pretty sad that an adult can be controlled so completely
> by today's media.
Hannah Storm thinks so...
glenn
|
63.2051 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 17:25 | 5 |
|
Nice try Glenn, when you don't have an answer for the question at hand,
change the subject.
|
63.2052 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 22 1996 17:35 | 13 |
|
What "question at hand"? This one?
> Phillips shouldn't be suspended, yet you advocated suspension for
> Belle as a result of the Halloween incident, didn't you?
I gave you the answer. No, you were wrong; I didn't advocate a
suspension, but I reserve the right to think that Albert Belle is
a first-class jerk. If you want to believe that this is a result
of media mind control, so be it.
glenn
|
63.2053 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 22 1996 17:38 | 8 |
|
The question at hand was related to whether you were knew the
exact details of the Halloween incident, or if you were basing
you accusations on partial data.
God help us if you read the National Enquirer and have as
much faith in that newspaper as you appear to have in other
media sources.
|
63.2055 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 22 1996 17:51 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2043 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> I will no longer address Indians comments made by bandwagon jumping
> fans.
Well since you have everyone over the age of 6 labeled as a bandwagon jumping
fan I guess we won't be hearing from you much any more.
George
|
63.2056 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 22 1996 18:12 | 19 |
|
> The question at hand was related to whether you were knew the
> exact details of the Halloween incident, or if you were basing
> you accusations on partial data.
"As is my custom, I refused to give out candy on Halloween. When
called on the practice by some fun-loving teenagers bearing eggs,
I dialed 9-1-1 in an obvious emergency and informed the police
that they'd better get someone over here, lest I were to 'kill'
somebody. When they delayed, I hopped into my late-model
Mercedes and proceeded to patrol the area, looking to strike the
first available urchin before the authorities arrived. I was
successful; unfortunately the injuries were only minor. On my
way home, I fueled up; only later did I realize that in my anger
I had paid credit-card prices at the cash pump. Next year,
beware of razor blades..."
-- Joey Belle, as told to The Enquirer
|
63.2057 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu May 23 1996 09:47 | 3 |
| Well, Black Jack's ERA went through a minor adjustment last night.
He'll still win 17 or 18...
|
63.2058 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 23 1996 13:52 | 8 |
|
Black Jack got slapped silly! Wonder where Clemens will be put in the
rotation when he gets traded to Cleveland later in the year.
I guess the best part about that prediction is, when someone heard
it they claimed Clemens would refuse to go. RIGHT! No thanks,
I'd rather stay here in losersville, USA than win a WS ring. I don't
think so... but I won't mention Jerry's name.
|
63.2059 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 23 1996 14:13 | 7 |
| Actually trading Clemens to the tribe would make some sense depending on who
they got in return. The Sox should be able to clean out the middle levels of
the Tribe's farm system and maybe get someone from AAA.
Who do you think the Tribe would offer?
George
|
63.2060 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 23 1996 14:21 | 31 |
|
George, I think you're dreaming here if you think Clemens will bring
enough to "clean out the middle levels of the Tribe's farm system."
Clemens is a free agent at the end of the season and could return to
Boston, stay with the team he gets traded to or go to another team.
This is *NOT* the Roger Clemens of the mid-80s. Clemens would bring
2 good prospects - not the 6 that someone else suggested in private.
The Sox need a closer, I would think the Indians would offer one
of their three young closers in waiting Alan Embree, Paul Shuey
or Danny Graves. Shuey and Graves are both pitching very well in
AAA, and Embree has pitched well in the majors this year (excluding
his last outing). Atlanta claimed he was the toughest lefty they
faced last year.
So it would be one of those three plus one other pitcher or position
player - but it would *NOT* be any of Bartolo Colon, Jaret Wright
or Casey Whitten. It could possibly be Albie Lopez or Chad Ogea.
Most of the position players are in the bigs... Herbert Perry plays
1b, so the sox would not want him. The Indians have to highly
rated SS prospects, but Boston doesn't need a SS. They do not have
what I consider to be a prime OF prospect at AAA or AA (although
Joe might disagree - Giles). Rich Sexson may be their best hitting
prospect now, but he's at AA, plays 1B and I doubt the Indians would
deal him.
The trade makes too much sense to me... believe me, Clemens *WILL*
get traded this year. Cleveland will land either Clemens, Appier
or the next pitcher down.
|
63.2061 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 23 1996 14:31 | 11 |
| I agree Clemens is not worth what he once was but he might be worth a lot to
the Indians this year because he could mean turning a good chance of winning
the Pennant and a so-so chance of beating the Braves into a solid chance of
winning the Pennant and good chance of beating the Braves.
Most likely you are right and he wouldn't clean out the Tribe's farm system
but I'd expect him to bring more than a couple prospects. Considering that many
prospects don't pan out, trading Clemens for 2 minor leaguers would really be
trading him for one good rookie. He'd be worth more than that to the Tribe.
George
|
63.2062 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu May 23 1996 14:31 | 12 |
| > They do not have
> what I consider to be a prime OF prospect at AAA or AA (although
> Joe might disagree - Giles).
Brian Giles? I'm surprised he's not collecting Social Security.
I don't think the Sox trade Clemens to Cleveland *unless* they can get one
of the highly rated guys you've said the Tribe won't part with. I think
Cleveland is more likely to get Appier.
I think Black Jack getting rocked last night is like those corrections
you hear about on the stock market.
|
63.2063 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu May 23 1996 14:34 | 34 |
|
> Most of the position players are in the bigs... Herbert Perry plays
> 1b, so the sox would not want him.
He's also not a prospect, but a plyaer at this point (albeit a decent
one).
> The Indians have to (sic) highly
> rated SS prospects, but Boston doesn't need a SS.
No, Boston needs catchers (I wouldn't mind trading them Diaz, except
he's the only thing resembling a catching prospect in the Tribe's
system), and OF. The Indians likely won't trade Wilson, but proably
would trade Jackson.
> They do not have
> what I consider to be a prime OF prospect at AAA or AA (although
> Joe might disagree - Giles).
He's not a _prime_ prospect - he's a bit too old for that - but
IMHO he'd make a _fine_ player. Hits for average, some power, some
speed, and he walks a ton. DD would like him, I think.
> Rich Sexson may be their best hitting
> prospect now, but he's at AA, plays 1B and I doubt the Indians would
> deal him.
Not likely. The Sox might be interested in Russell Branyan, or maybe
David Miller or Sean Casey.
I can certainly see a Embree/Graves/Shuey (pick one) plus Giles and
an A-ball pitcher for Clemens deal...
Joe
|
63.2064 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu May 23 1996 14:36 | 7 |
|
>Brian Giles? I'm surprised he's not collecting Social Security.
He's only 25, and posted a .500 SLG and nearly a .400 OBP in Buffalo
last year. Looks like a decent player to me...
Joe
|
63.2065 | Indian's Minor League Stats | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 23 1996 14:44 | 65 |
| Indians AAA as of last week (USA Today WWW):
BUFFALO BISONS
AVG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB
#Candaele, Casey, 2B ... .310 145 22 45 8 1 1 10 8 12 2
Costo, Tim, DH ... .206 34 4 7 1 0 2 5 2 11 0
*Dunn, Steve, 1B ... .244 86 9 21 4 1 2 15 4 18 1
*Giles, Brian, OF ... .275 120 21 33 5 0 7 20 14 9 0
*Helfand, Eric, C ... .250 64 9 16 2 0 1 5 11 12 0
Jackson, Damian, SS ... .252 111 15 28 2 0 0 10 8 15 3
Lis, Joe, 2B ... .169 77 12 13 4 0 3 9 9 10 0
Marsh, Tom, OF ... .252 119 17 30 6 0 5 12 3 22 4
Perry, Herbert, 1B ... .368 87 10 32 6 0 2 16 3 11 2
Sparks, Don, 3B ... .292 130 16 38 5 1 2 15 22 27 1
Thompson, Ryan, OF ... .204 142 17 29 5 0 4 16 5 33 4
*Wilson, Nigel, DH ... .313 112 24 35 6 0 9 29 12 23 0
Wilson, Tom, C ... .278 54 8 15 6 0 2 7 8 17 0
W L ERA G SV IP H R ER BB SO
*Cadaret, Greg .... 0 1 5.40 1 0 1.2 0 1 1 3 0
Cornelius, Reid .... 1 0 4.35 7 0 31.0 38 17 15 15 18
Graves, Dan .... 2 0 0.76 18 11 35.1 23 3 3 7 19
Lewis, James .... 3 1 5.06 7 0 37.1 42 24 21 16 28
Lopez, Albie .... 2 0 1.61 4 0 22.1 12 6 4 15 23
Ogea, Chad .... 0 0 3.00 1 0 3.0 3 1 1 0 3
Scott, Darryl .... 0 1 1.99 11 0 22.2 16 5 5 6 19
Shuey, Paul .... 2 2 1.31 12 3 20.2 11 3 3 8 29
Wertz, Bill .... 1 1 5.14 11 0 21.0 26 13 12 12 15
*Whitten, Casey .... 1 0 3.86 2 0 9.1 6 6 4 4 9
*Williams, Jimmy .... 5 3 4.39 11 0 26.2 28 17 13 17 25
Indians AA as of last week (USA Today WWW):
CANTON-AKRON INDIANS
AVG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB
Aven, Bruce, OF ... .248 141 23 35 6 1 6 19 18 41 7
*Betts, Todd, 3B ... .221 113 15 25 5 0 1 12 21 27 0
Betzsold, James, OF ... .167 42 3 7 1 0 0 4 5 17 1
Bryant, Pat, OF ... .189 90 13 17 1 1 3 16 17 19 6
Diaz, Einar, C ... .319 119 15 38 14 0 1 11 1 6 1
Gutierrez, Ricky, 2B ... .232 151 24 35 2 0 3 14 13 14 12
*McCall, Rod, DH ... .324 74 13 24 3 0 4 12 9 19 1
Neal, Mike, 3B ... .189 53 5 10 1 0 0 9 10 10 0
Ramirez, Alex, OF ... .289 128 16 37 7 3 1 17 6 19 7
Sexson, Richie, 1B ... .294 160 26 47 9 2 5 27 14 40 0
Soliz, Steve, C ... .243 37 4 9 3 1 0 2 2 8 1
*Thomas, Greg, DH ... .225 89 10 20 4 0 4 12 7 19 0
#Wilson, Enrique, SS ... .329 167 18 55 5 2 0 22 13 19 10
CANTON-AKRON INDIANS
W L ERA G SV IP H R ER BB SO
Brown, Dickie .... 0 2 8.03 6 0 12.1 13 12 11 9 11
Colon, Bartolo .... 2 0 1.15 7 0 39.0 26 7 5 16 45
DeLaMaza, Roland .... 3 1 4.67 14 0 34.2 29 19 18 12 41
DeLaRosa, Maximo .... 2 3 5.03 14 3 19.2 17 12 11 17 21
Driskill, Travis .... 2 2 6.06 9 0 35.2 42 31 24 18 34
*Kline, Steven .... 1 0 2.35 5 0 30.2 29 9 8 9 25
Martinez, Johnny .... 0 1 5.40 5 0 8.1 9 6 5 4 3
*Matthews, Mike .... 0 6 6.21 8 0 42.0 47 31 29 17 34
*McCormack, Andy .... 0 1 27.00 1 0 0.1 0 1 1 1 0
Montoya, Wilmer .... 0 0 3.00 3 2 3.0 3 1 1 3 2
*Plantenberg, Erik .... 0 0 4.05 5 0 6.2 8 3 3 0 9
Sexton, Jeff .... 2 3 4.98 8 0 47.0 40 26 26 21 34
*Tolar, Kevin .... 1 2 2.40 15 1 15.0 14 9 4 3 14
Vaught, Jay .... 1 2 3.14 15 1 28.2 28 13 10 8 20
George
|
63.2066 | Don't kid yourself, Groaner... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu May 23 1996 14:47 | 22 |
|
> George, I think you're dreaming here if you think Clemens will bring
> enough to "clean out the middle levels of the Tribe's farm system."
Cleveland's farm system is not that incredibly deep any more. That's
not a problem, because the great talent is in the bigs, but I don't
think George's statement is way off base.
> So it would be one of those three plus one other pitcher or position
> player - but it would *NOT* be any of Bartolo Colon, Jaret Wright
> or Casey Whitten. It could possibly be Albie Lopez or Chad Ogea.
Why wouldn't it be one of those big three? If Clemens is pitching
as he is right now, the price would be steep, you can be sure of it.
The compensation draft picks make that a reality; the Sox don't
_have_ to rid themselves of Clemens. He won't just be had for a
borderline chump like Paul Shuey. So it'll likely include one of
three mentioned above, or a deal with multiple players, including
2 or 3 players of the likes of Embree, Lopez, Ogea.
glenn
|
63.2067 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 23 1996 15:31 | 6 |
|
Cone was traded for 3 single A prospects. Clemens for 2 AA/AAA
prospects is reasonable. I'd think Boston would jump at an
Ogea or Lopez + Embree or Shuey for Clemens deal. Heck, if
Boston really wants Clemens, he could resign after the end
of the season and return with his WS ring.
|
63.2068 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Better days are coming bye and bye. BS | Thu May 23 1996 15:35 | 4 |
| I would go after Smiley if the Reds continue to stall in the central
but that's not a given. Cleveland has to be looking South(paw)
although perhaps Justice not be available for the series would alter
that a little. Still there's McGriff.
|
63.2069 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 23 1996 15:37 | 24 |
|
Its a complement hearing Shuey called a borderline chump from a fan of
a team who hasn't produced anything resembling a major league pitcher
since Roger Clemens. Shuey is still learning how to pitch, and with
his numbers in AAA this year, I'd guess he's pretty close to being
ready.
PLAYER W L S ERA G GS CG SHO IP H R ER
Shuey 2 2 3 1.19 13 0 0 0 22.2 11 3 3
HR BB SO HB WP BK
1 8 34 0 1 0
That's 34 Ks in 22 1/3 ip...
... and if Boston is really stupid, they'll hold onto Clemens and watch
him walk at the end of the year... sure they'll get the draft picks and
that's it - so in 5 years they might have something to show for it.
Clemens claims he likes it in Boston, but is he willing to stay here
knowing the odds of him winning a WS is ZILCH. I don't think so...
every blown save in one of his outings pushes him closer and closer to
leaving at the end of the season.
p.s. I'd rather have Appier anyways.
|
63.2070 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 23 1996 15:38 | 2 |
|
I'd take Schourek over Smiley.
|
63.2071 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu May 23 1996 15:38 | 6 |
| >>Brian Giles? I'm surprised he's not collecting Social Security.
>
> He's only 25, and posted a .500 SLG and nearly a .400 OBP in Buffalo
> last year. Looks like a decent player to me...
Is this the same Brian Giles who was with the Mets forever ago?
|
63.2072 | :-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu May 23 1996 15:38 | 8 |
|
Groan Do you want Kamienicki?
Joe. He's 25? He better do something soon or by yours and your hero
Bill James he'll be over the hill.
Chap
|
63.2073 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 23 1996 15:44 | 2 |
|
Kam is a stiff.
|
63.2074 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Better days are coming bye and bye. BS | Thu May 23 1996 15:56 | 1 |
| Shourek - perhaps you're right. But Smiley would be the one available.
|
63.2075 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu May 23 1996 16:44 | 20 |
|
> Joe. He's 25? He better do something soon or by yours and your hero
> Bill James he'll be over the hill.
Besides the fact that Bill James is not my hero (I enjoy his writings,
and he contributed a lot to the study of baseball, but he made a lot
of mistakes as well), Giles _is_ doing something. He's putting
together a second straight good year at Buffalo. There's every
indication that he's a major league player right now, but he doesn't
have the opportunity behind Belle, Lofton, Ramirez, and Burnitz,
and Kirby's roster spot is safe so long as Belle's with the Tribe.
I believe he'd hit .280-.290 in the majors right now, with 15-25 HR,
a good OBP, and 10 SB or so.
BTW, Chappy - on average, players peak at age 27; Giles should have his
best season in 1998, or thereabouts, and should be an above average
player through 2001 or so - not an unreasonable pick up at this
point.
Joe
|
63.2076 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Better days are coming bye and bye. BS | Thu May 23 1996 17:15 | 9 |
| But Joe don't you think he'll atrophy badly if kept in the minors.
Players like Selby indicate to me that there is a serious gulf between
AAA and the majors right now. Suppan and his major league pitching
record and minor league record is a reverse indication.
I'd say those teams able to move prospects up and let them learn
against major leaguers, like Cleveland from 1990-1993, have a big
advantage vs clubs like the RedSox who attempt to contend every year
(since 1967).
|
63.2077 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 23 1996 17:34 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2076 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Better days are coming bye and bye. BS" >>>
> Players like Selby indicate to me that there is a serious gulf between
> AAA and the majors right now.
I don't think the gulf is that serious. Last year Selby hit .286 with 13 home
runs in Double A. He hit .236 for the Sox in the majors. That's not bad for
your 1st few weeks after jumping up 2 levels. He certainly wasn't up long
enough to say it means all that much. If 2 more of his 46 at bats had found
legs and gone for hits he would have been around .270.
As for Suppan, again you are making the mistake of trying to say something
meaningful out of a small sample size. Last year he only had 3 starts in the
majors. We don't really have any indication about how well he would do if
he were to spend several months in the big leagues.
George
|
63.2078 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu May 23 1996 17:36 | 31 |
|
> But Joe don't you think he'll atrophy badly if kept in the minors.
If he's still in the minors for another couple of years, then sure,
it's a possibility.
> Players like Selby indicate to me that there is a serious gulf between
> AAA and the majors right now.
I disagree.
> Suppan and his major league pitching
> record and minor league record is a reverse indication.
You're looking at cases with small sample sizes, wherein anything's
possibile.
Minor league stats have, in almost every case, proven a reasonable
prediction for major league success in the past; there's no reason
to believe this is no longer the case. It _is_ possible that the
gap is somewhat larger, but this can be reasonably accounted for.
> I'd say those teams able to move prospects up and let them learn
> against major leaguers, like Cleveland from 1990-1993, have a big
> advantage vs clubs like the RedSox who attempt to contend every year
> (since 1967).
It's certainly possible, particularly where position players are
concerned.
Joe
|
63.2079 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Better days are coming bye and bye. BS | Thu May 23 1996 17:56 | 10 |
| Well there's one enormous indication of the disparity between major and
minor: The horrific pitching at the major league level and teams not
diving down the the minors to attempt to correct the problem.
One point that some have inferred is that AA and AAA is not that much
different. But Joe and Paul and others, including yourself if you
approach this question objectively, could probably make a more
expansive attempt to answer the question "How large is the disparity
between major and minor leagues and is it so large that good prospects
may be hurt by spending too much time on the farm?".
|
63.2080 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 23 1996 18:07 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2079 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Better days are coming bye and bye. BS" >>>
> Well there's one enormous indication of the disparity between major and
> minor: The horrific pitching at the major league level and teams not
> diving down the the minors to attempt to correct the problem.
First of all, what numbers are you comparing? Are you looking at average
ERA in the majors v. average ERA in the minors? If so, for what years? This
season is still pretty young to be making that type of comparison.
Even if there is a big difference with major league ERAs being much higher
that would suggest that yes the split between major league and minor league
hitters was great but it would also suggest that the split between major and
minor league pitchers was small. Either that or there is some other difference
like different size strike zones, hotter major league balls, or something.
In any case, it's not clear that rushing a guy into the majors will make
him a better player. In some cases maybe that works. Guys like Griffey,
Willie Mays, Eddie Mathews, and Jimmy Fox seemed to do well as youngsters
but others might be so overpowered they wouldn't get a chance to learn how
to play the game.
George
|
63.2081 | Duquette should play hardball on this one | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Fri May 24 1996 11:04 | 29 |
|
> Its a complement hearing Shuey called a borderline chump from a fan of
> a team who hasn't produced anything resembling a major league pitcher
> since Roger Clemens.
So maybe Shuey has grown some and can no longer be considered a
1st-round bust. Still, I would want more than a reliever as the
#1 player in a deal for Clemens.
As for developing ML pitching, the Indians are still heavily reliant
on non-homegrown pitchers (Martinez, Hershiser, McDowell, Mesa) to
get much of the job done. And, imo, with the Indians Clemens would
nonetheless become the #1 starter.
Baseball America rates Indians' prospects Colon, Wright, and Whitten
at #15, #34, and previously unranked, respectively. For the services
of a Roger Clemens (or Kevin Appier) in a World Series championship
drive, I don't see that anyone with the possible exception of Colon
as "untouchable". For a team such as the Indians, I see such a
trade as totally defensible. This is quite a bit different than if
a much weaker team such as the Yankees had to give up the store for
David Cone last year (which they didn't).
Come money time, I'd rather have Clemens than Appier. Even in last
year's playoffs, in that game the Sox' bullpen/defense blew, Clemens
did a nice job in checking that mighty Indians' lineup.
glenn
|
63.2082 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri May 24 1996 11:54 | 8 |
|
w.r.t. Mesa
I don't know - I have to consider him primarily a product of Cleveland;
he showed no particular inclination towards being a pitcher before he
came to the Tribe, where he developed significantly.
Joe
|
63.2083 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Fri May 24 1996 12:14 | 14 |
|
> I don't know - I have to consider him primarily a product of Cleveland;
> he showed no particular inclination towards being a pitcher before he
> came to the Tribe, where he developed significantly.
They had the wisdom to move him into fulltime short relief. But I
doubt seriously they did anything especial to "develop" him, fix
his mechanics, etc. Nonetheless, for the record there's no way that
he's a product of the Cleveland minor-league system, like a guy who
may have been drafted elsewhere but spent the bulk of his minor-league
career with another organization.
glenn
|
63.2084 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri May 24 1996 12:35 | 28 |
|
Yes, clearly he's not a product of Cleveland's minor league system.
> They had the wisdom to move him into fulltime short relief. But I
> doubt seriously they did anything especial to "develop" him, fix
> his mechanics, etc.
I don't know - it appears to _me_ there was some development:
1991 - 124 innings, 151 hits, 62 walks, 64 strikeouts, 5.97 ERA
1992 - 161 innings, 169 hits, 70 walks, 62 strikeouts, 4.59 ERA
1993 - 209 innings, 232 hits, 62 walks, 118 strikeouts, 4.92 ERA
1994 - 73 innings, 71 hits, 26 walks, 63 strikeouts, 3.82 ERA
1995 - 64 innings, 49 hits, 17 walks, 58 strikeouts, 1.13 ERA
1996 - 22 innings, 15 hits, 6 walks, 19 strikeouts, 2.05 ERA
W/inning ratios: 0.50, 0.43, 0.30, 0.36, 0.27, 0.27
K/inning ratios: 0.52, 0.39, 0.56, 0.86, 0.91, 0.86
H/inning ratios: 1.22, 1.05, 1.11, 0.99, 0.77, 0.68
Hmmm - maybe it _was_ more the switch to relief than I thought.
I had expected to see less of a divide between 1993 and 1994 than
there was. There certainly _was_ a big cut in his walk rate in 1993,
but the other numbers really took off when he switched jobs.
OK, I'll buy your argument.
Joe
|
63.2085 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri May 24 1996 13:31 | 7 |
|
Jeff Suppan is only 21 years old, if the Sox don't have a chance
at anything they will leave him at AAA all season long. The last
pitcher under 21 who accomplished something was Dwight Gooden. Roger
Clemens was 22 when he first started for the Red Sox.
Ron
|
63.2086 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri May 24 1996 13:40 | 15 |
|
That's looking more and more likely. There was talk at 1st when he got
sent down that he was tuning up to take over Wakefield's spot but Wakefield
has turned around somewhat and while he still isn't that great he's been
doing ok. Or perhaps to put it another way, he's no longer doing bad enough
for the team to justify dumping him and eating his salary.
So with 4 guys ahead of him the problem with bringing Suppan up now would be
that he'd be the 5th starter and wouldn't get the work he'll get in Pawtucket.
If any of the top four were to go down with an injury I bet he would get the
call to fill that slot. If not then we may not see him around Boston until they
go to the 40 man rosters in September.
George
|
63.2087 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Better days are coming bye and bye. BS | Tue May 28 1996 11:47 | 16 |
| Gammons btw devoted his column Sunday to the subject of bringing
players up from the minors. He considered it a given that there IS a
major disparity at this time between the majors and minors. I had
observed a few years ago that the National League was serving as a 4A
between the top minors and the A.L. Not so at any rate any more.
The question now is Should pitchers (especially) and position players
serve out lengthy internships at a level two clicks below Major league
or learn at the big league level. A good argument for the second
choice is both Cleveland and Atlanta who developed its current teams at
the top level moving the Smoltzs and Glavines and Joey Belles up early
because of weak teams.
The Redsox had a great prospect in the 60s (Stevenson who now scouts)
and lost him when they sent him down to the minors and he injured his
arm on a poorly groomed mound.
|
63.2088 | Kevin Kennedy too BLAM for "rushing" Suppan-- not | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue May 28 1996 12:06 | 34 |
|
> Gammons btw devoted his column Sunday to the subject of bringing
> players up from the minors. He considered it a given that there IS a
> major disparity at this time between the majors and minors.
Yes, I think the hitters in MLB are so damned good at present that
for the pitchers, there's a huge difference. Now, if you're a good
hitter, you're probably not going to be too intimidated by the jump
to MLB. It may only be cyclical, but pitching is way way down, imo.
Umpires, expansion, and new ballparks can't entirely explain the
offensive explosion of the last 3-4 seasons. Hitters are flatout
dominating. Hopefully, for the good of the sport, there will be a
correction over the next 5 years.
> The question now is Should pitchers (especially) and position players
> serve out lengthy internships at a level two clicks below Major league
> or learn at the big league level. A good argument for the second
> choice is both Cleveland and Atlanta who developed its current teams at
> the top level moving the Smoltzs and Glavines and Joey Belles up early
> because of weak teams.
The part of Gammons' case for _not_ bringing up a Jeff Suppan now,
that I don't agree with, is the claim that unlike with Cleveland
and Atlanta, Boston is in a "win now" situation. Who says? This
is once again an example of the hypocritical Boston sports media
which is exceedingly critical and cynical when the Sox are losing.
The media more than any other factor would be responsible for
placing pressure on Suppan were he to be recalled (I can see the
Herald headlines already-- "Sup-panned!"). Most fans I know would
rather see Suppan, through all his struggles, than endure one more
start from the likes of Jamie Moyer.
glenn
|
63.2089 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue May 28 1996 12:12 | 38 |
|
> Gammons btw devoted his column Sunday to the subject of bringing
> players up from the minors. He considered it a given that there IS a
> major disparity at this time between the majors and minors. I had
> observed a few years ago that the National League was serving as a 4A
> between the top minors and the A.L. Not so at any rate any more.
I read it, and I still think it's a bunch of malarky. Pitchers have
_always_ taken longer to adjust to the majors, for any number of
reasons. There are rare exceptions, but the difficulty in adjusting
to _any_ new level of competition is one of the reasons I believe
Earl Weaver was dead-on with his use of rookie pitchers in the
bullpen.
Two of his three examples, btw (Wilson and Benes; I can't remember
who else he cited) pitched less than 120 innings _combined_ in AAA
last year.
> The question now is Should pitchers (especially) and position players
> serve out lengthy internships at a level two clicks below Major league
> or learn at the big league level. A good argument for the second
> choice is both Cleveland and Atlanta who developed its current teams at
> the top level moving the Smoltzs and Glavines and Joey Belles up early
> because of weak teams.
My opinion is that hitters should _always_ be moved along as fast as
their bats warrant; pitchers should be held to a somewhat tighter
standard.
BTW, Alex Rodriguez did _not_ fail in his first two major league
attempts, as Gammons likes to claim; all indications last year were
that Rodriguez was a major league baseball player.
I also quite enjoyed how Gammons talked about the difference between
AAA and the majors in one section, and then in the very next section
talked about the success of a rookie pitcher (whose name escapes me).
Joe
|
63.2090 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue May 28 1996 12:29 | 16 |
| re .2088,
Glen, I interpreted the "Win Now" completely different then you
did. Gammons was referring to "Win Now", as do the Sox have a
legitimate chance at winning the division or a wildcard? If Yes, then
bring up Suppan, if no then leave him in AAA for the season. There is
no reason to bring him up if your going to finish in 3rd place. Gammons
doesn't think the Sox have a chance, so he prefers leaving Suppan at
AAA. KK wants to bring Suppan up now, but the Sox don't want him to
lose his confidence if he doesn't have success, plus the Sox need a
long relief man more than a starting pitcher.
If Jeff went to UCLA instead of signing with the Sox, he would most
likely have been a top 10 pick in this years June 10th draft.
Ron
|
63.2091 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue May 28 1996 12:47 | 9 |
| One problem with bringing Suppan up right now is that Kennedy might use him
in long relief. That might fit into Kennedy's short term plans for trying to
get the team to win but might not fit the clubs long term plans for Suppan.
Somewhere it was mentioned that the next time they bring Suppan up they
would like him to stay. That would probably be best if there was a spot for
him in the starting rotation.
George
|
63.2092 | There's always a break-in period in the majors-- make it now | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue May 28 1996 12:50 | 26 |
|
> Glen, I interpreted the "Win Now" completely different then you
> did. Gammons was referring to "Win Now", as do the Sox have a
> legitimate chance at winning the division or a wildcard? If Yes, then
> bring up Suppan, if no then leave him in AAA for the season. There is
> no reason to bring him up if your going to finish in 3rd place. Gammons
> doesn't think the Sox have a chance, so he prefers leaving Suppan at
> AAA.
I don't think that was Gammons' point, because he raised the "win now"
exception in the context of what the Cubs did with Greg Maddux, and the
Braves with their entire staff, which was to allow them to develop,
successfully, in the big leagues with weak teams.
I don't see any point to leaving Suppan in AAA. AAA ain't MLB, and
Suppan is fairly dominating the International League.
And yes, the Sox need relief pitching, but they only "don't need"
starting pitching relative to the poor relief work. In their own
right, Wakefield, Sele, Gordon and Moyer (and now Eshelman, who is
_not_ a prospect just because he throws with his left arm; I don't
care what these writers think) have been stinking the joint out
on a regular basis.
glenn
|
63.2093 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue May 28 1996 14:09 | 11 |
|
> One problem with bringing Suppan up right now is that Kennedy might use him
>in long relief. That might fit into Kennedy's short term plans for trying to
>get the team to win but might not fit the clubs long term plans for Suppan.
If I were primarily a Red Sox fan, I'd hope like anything that's
exactly what he does. Suppan's young enough that pitch counts are
very important, and Kennedy's shown no particular realization of
this in the past (for a great example, look at Rick Helling).
JOe
|
63.2094 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 29 1996 09:31 | 11 |
|
Is it true that Roger Clemens got slapped silly last night and lost
to a rookie pitcher from Oakland. Heck, Boston would be lucky to
get a guy like Wayne Kirby from Cleveland for Clemens...!
Mo's getting good press on his so called impressive season, problem is,
does he lead Belle in any category? HRs? AVE? SLG? 2B? RBI? R?
Answer - NO?
|
63.2095 | Cannot tell a psycho from a normal human being... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 29 1996 10:42 | 9 |
|
> problem is,
> does he lead Belle in any category?
Just one, MVP awards. Mo 1, Joey 0.
glenn
|
63.2096 | That should do it I think. | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed May 29 1996 11:48 | 4 |
| Any other questions grono?
Re-1: Beautiful.........
|
63.2097 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed May 29 1996 13:05 | 19 |
| Haven't been in here in awhile, but I believe Albert "Joey" Belle has
serious personal problems. It won't surprise me one bit to see his
name in a headline in the future (even when he's out of baseball)
regarding *serious* criminal violence of some sort.
And Tony Phillips ain't far behind. This guy has a HUGE ego and
attitude problem (which seems to have surfaced since he left Detroit
and became a starter...under LaRussa, I might add). I'd like to see
someone on an opposing team clean his clock.
re: Clemens to Cleveland
Cleveland will pay *more* for any decent pitcher now that they've
surfaced as a winning team...unless there are no other bidders,
which is impossible in today's MLB. So SHU-U-U-U-EY won't be
the *significant* part of any Clemens deal. He assed was kicked
so badly at the ML level that he'd have to remedy that to be
regarded so highly.
|
63.2098 | But Jimmy decided to be the peaceful enforcer | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 29 1996 13:24 | 13 |
|
> And Tony Phillips ain't far behind. This guy has a HUGE ego and
> attitude problem (which seems to have surfaced since he left Detroit
> and became a starter...under LaRussa, I might add). I'd like to see
> someone on an opposing team clean his clock.
Phillips has a bit of a temper, and has been invloved in a couple
of scrapes in games against the Sox in recent years. Jim Rice had
to take him task on one occasion when Phillips was foolhardy enough
to want to mess with Jim Ed...
glenn
|
63.2099 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed May 29 1996 13:59 | 4 |
| what was so beautiful about it Bruce? Bottom line is the fools that vote let
their prejudices against Belle cloud their judgement. Stats favor Belle, final
team standings favor Belle, and historical significance of stats (50 HR's and 50
Dbl's) favor Belle. Truth be told Belle was ROBBED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
63.2100 | AlSpurt has an MVP Goose Egg! Hahahahahaha | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed May 29 1996 14:10 | 9 |
| What I thought was beautiful was the the MO 1 Joey 0 comment. I didn't
say the writers were beautiful with their pick.
Grono jumped in for his daily stirring of the pot and in my view
slammed for it 8>).
Bottom line MO 1 Alspurt 0 Nuf Ced!
PS: Nuf Ced. Is that the right pronunciation George?
|
63.2101 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed May 29 1996 14:24 | 9 |
| >what was so beautiful about it Bruce? Bottom line is the fools that vote let
>their prejudices against Belle cloud their judgement. Stats favor Belle, final
>team standings favor Belle, and historical significance of stats (50 HR's and
>50 Dbl's) favor Belle. Truth be told Belle was ROBBED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No more so than Salmon (my pick), Valentin, Thomas, Thome, and a few
others...
Joe
|
63.2102 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed May 29 1996 14:59 | 4 |
| >Truth be told Belle was ROBBED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
One of the more *pleasant* injustices, which, we can only hope, will
continue to happen as long as he's in baseball.
|
63.2103 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 29 1996 15:09 | 24 |
|
Using the "ass kicked" in the majors logic, I guess all the
talk about Suppan is just hot air. Heck, the guy must be a
stiff, look at his major league stats from last year.
1-2 record, 5.96 ERA, 1.50 ratio
Clearly he's a stiff who shouldn't be given a shot at the major
league level.
My comment was that a package of two pitching prospects from the
Indians organization (plus possibly fringe minor leaguers) could
get Clemens... maybe its three prospects, but one will not be
Colon or Wright - PERIOD!
The package could include one of: Shuey or Graves - both have
been highly impressive in AAA and Boston has no closer. One
of: Lopez, Ogea, Roa, Embree and possibly Kirkreit.
This is the 90's... there's no such thing as an untouchable,
Boston can belly up to the table and admit their team sucks and
get something for Clemens or they can take their chances with
the draft picks... and if the past is any indication of the
future, they won't do too well with the draft picks.
|
63.2104 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 29 1996 15:10 | 4 |
|
Belle has hit 65 HRs in his last 150 games... put that in your pipe and
smoke it. Anyone who thinks Vaughn is a better offensive player than
Belle is simply biased.
|
63.2105 | rorrim | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed May 29 1996 15:12 | 1 |
| Biased? Did you say Biased? Quick, find a mirror.
|
63.2106 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 29 1996 15:21 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2104 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> Belle has hit 65 HRs in his last 150 games... put that in your pipe and
> smoke it. Anyone who thinks Vaughn is a better offensive player than
> Belle is simply biased.
I'm not sure anyone is making that claim. I believe that just about everyone
agrees that Bell has the better stats and if MVP was based on stats alone he'd
be a lock to get it.
However when you consider things like leadership, positive influence in the
club house, etc then Vaughn moves up on the list and Bell falls off sharply.
Remember, this is the "Most Valuable" player award, not the "Best offense"
player award or the Golden Glove.
George
|
63.2107 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 29 1996 15:23 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2100 by STRATA::BTOWER >>>
> PS: Nuf Ced. Is that the right pronunciation George?
Yes, that's exactly how it sounds.
Speaking of pitchers, Hershiser, who's now ripping along at 4-4 with a 6.17
ERA really got pounded by the Rangers last night. He went 1 2/3 innings giving
up 8 hits and 6 runs.
George
|
63.2108 | Two pitchers past their primes | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Best of luck, Marcus! | Wed May 29 1996 15:26 | 3 |
| Speaking of getting pounded, what was Roger's line lasted night?
NAZZ
|
63.2109 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed May 29 1996 15:39 | 11 |
|
George,
> However when you consider things like leadership, positive influence in the
>club house, etc then Vaughn moves up on the list and Bell falls off sharply.
Why do you claim this? I've _never_ heard Belle criticized by his
teammates or Grover for his leadership or clubhouse influence; quite
the opposite, I've heard him praised for it.
Joe
|
63.2110 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 29 1996 15:41 | 3 |
|
Joe, the reason he's claiming that is because he's making wild
assumptions based on the limited data that he has.
|
63.2111 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 29 1996 15:43 | 23 |
| You are a sportswriter and you just received your MVP ballot for 1998. The
following two player are the top two contenders.
AB R H TB D T HR RBI BB SO SB CS AVE
=== === === === === === === === === === == == =====
Vo Maughn 550 98 165 316 28 3 39 126 68 150 11 4 0.300
Bruce Tower 548 79 157 280 15 9 30 126 63 200 24 8 0.286
Vo Maughn is a malcontent off the field. Bruce Tower is active in the
community - he does Pepsi commercials, works with children, helps out
at church bake sales, and helps elderly people cross the road - you
know what it's like in this state with the drivers!
Neither player plays a key defensive position, and neither is exactly
a gold glove player.
Vo Maughn plays on Buggs Moran, a team that ran away with their division,
clinching it in early June. Bruce Tower played on a team that exceeded
expectations and won their division despite preseason predictions of a
3rd place finish.
Which player would you vote for MVP?
|
63.2112 | No Brainer | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed May 29 1996 15:54 | 1 |
| I'd vote for me but I'd be biased 8>).
|
63.2113 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 29 1996 15:56 | 3 |
|
Any similarities to person living or dead, or actual events is purely
intentional, er I mean coincidental.
|
63.2114 | the next George Foster | CONSLT::MOYNIHAN | | Wed May 29 1996 16:01 | 8 |
|
> Belle has hit 65 HRs in his last 150 games... put that in your
pipe and smoke it. Anyone who thinks Vaughn is a better offensive
player than Belle is simply biased
I heard/read it was 65 HR's in his last 162 games. Keeping in mind that
the last 20 Homers were in April and May and not August and September.
|
63.2115 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Wed May 29 1996 16:18 | 12 |
|
not a big mystery. When a player has a "reputation" tagged on him that
is not favorable in the eyes of the media, he will not win the MVP.
The samething happened to Strawberry in '89. The guy had a great year
but the Mets lost in NLCS to the Dodgers. The MVP went to Kirk Gibson.
Gibson had a nice year but not as nice as Strawberry. Gibson won
because he was labled as a hard-worker, huslter who was the media's
little darling. Samething happened to Barry Bonds as well. Belle is no
different and until he cleans up his image with the media, he will
probably never win it.
|
63.2116 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Wed May 29 1996 16:18 | 3 |
|
oops I meant 1988, not 1989.
|
63.2117 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed May 29 1996 16:31 | 6 |
| TAP TAP Tower hits 30 home runs.......What did you pull out his 1982
stats when he still had home run power!!!!!
8*)
Jimbo
|
63.2118 | The Gym ain't helpin. | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed May 29 1996 16:37 | 1 |
| I keep tellin ya, It's the restricted flight balls!!!
|
63.2119 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed May 29 1996 16:38 | 4 |
|
MMMMMMMM Super Red Dots.....
|
63.2120 | Amswer me this one. | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed May 29 1996 16:44 | 2 |
| OK. You have just received your sports noter MVP Ballot. Would anyone
besides a name that rhymes with BONO vote for themselves.
|
63.2121 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 29 1996 18:06 | 28 |
|
So what if he hit 20 in April and May...? The guy can't win. Last
year the pundits are all saying - well he hit all those HRs late in
the season in Cleveland when they already had the division wrapped up,
including a ton in August and September. This year we hear, well
he hit a load in April and May and not August and September... maybe
you should go back and look at last years numbers. *AND* if you
followed the Indians, you'd know that many of this 21 HRs this year
were great winners or game breakers.
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2114 CLEVELAND INDIANS 2114 of 2120
CONSLT::MOYNIHAN 8 lines 29-MAY-1996 15:01
-< the next George Foster >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Belle has hit 65 HRs in his last 150 games... put that in your
pipe and smoke it. Anyone who thinks Vaughn is a better offensive
player than Belle is simply biased
I heard/read it was 65 HR's in his last 162 games. Keeping in mind that
the last 20 Homers were in April and May and not August and September.
|
63.2122 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 29 1996 18:32 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2109 by ROCK::HUBER "From Sinker to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> Why do you claim this? I've _never_ heard Belle criticized by his
> teammates or Grover for his leadership or clubhouse influence; quite
> the opposite, I've heard him praised for it.
His team mates are not the ones doing the voting. The impression that the
press seems to have, true or not, is that Bell is not a leadership kind of
guy.
Now maybe he's the picture of inspiration inside the club house and
only reverts to being nasty when the press is around but the simple fact
is that the MVP is the guy who the PRESS thinks is the best player and
all around wonderfull guy.
You can't deny that Bell has not exactly done a great job of campaigning
for MVP among those who cast the votes.
George
|
63.2123 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed May 29 1996 19:21 | 10 |
|
Interesting stat that ESPN had the other day, Which pitcher has
been given the most run support per game, since 1994?
Answer: Charles Nagy at 7.21 runs per game
Ron
|
63.2124 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 29 1996 21:19 | 11 |
|
re: .2122
Interesting point by George...forget if Belle actually *IS* a team leader
and there is no proof that he isn't... in fact, you always see Belle
as one of the first players out of the dugout when a teammate hits an
HR or does something good at the plate... lets trust the press and
their impression of the situation.
Is this the same George that said "ignore the press impression of OJs
guilt"?
|
63.2125 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 30 1996 09:10 | 14 |
|
I didn't say we should trust the press. What I'm saying is that it is the
press that votes for these awards and it is their impression, right or wrong,
that determines who will win.
Regardless of what Bell is really like behind closed doors, he's done quite
a bit to alienate the press. I'm not saying that's bad, I'm not saying that
means that he doesn't deserve an award, all I'm saying is that if you bite
the hand that feeds you you are not likely to get fed.
Bell, for what ever reason, treats the press like krap and they return the
favor when it comes time to vote for MVP.
George
|
63.2126 | Once more | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | Soar with the Eagles! | Thu May 30 1996 09:40 | 18 |
| Sorry that this report is not first hand, I wasn't there,
just relaying what was reported in the media ... :-)
But Big Bad Albert is at it again ... seems that after one of
his homeruns in Texas that Albert wanted the ball ... so security
goes into the stands, finds the fan that caught the homerun,
and escort him down to the clubhouse ... Albert says he wants
the ball, the fan says "Sure" just give me an autographed ball in
return ... Albert Says "No", claims the fans in left field were
harrassing him, and swears at the fan ... the fan tells Albert
to pound sand ...
The Indians have apologized to the fan and promised him a ball
signed by all the Indians (except Albert) ...
Will this guy ever grow up??
Vinny
|
63.2127 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu May 30 1996 10:10 | 16 |
| > Albert Says "No", claims the fans in left field were
> harrassing him, and swears at the fan ... the fan tells Albert
> to pound sand ...
> The Indians have apologized to the fan and promised him a ball
> signed by all the Indians (except Albert) ...
> Will this guy ever grow up??
It ain't a matter of growing up, he's just a mean, nasty S-O-B Vinny.
I hope he pulls a hammy and stays out a few weeks, thereby messin' up
his season totals so the MVP argument becomes mute.
Hey Groaner, will Cleveland even attempt to re-sign this headache ?
|
63.2128 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu May 30 1996 10:14 | 7 |
|
Cleveland _has_ attempted to resign Belle. They've offered him
a very generous contract.
Personally, I'd offer arbitration, and let him go if he insists.
Joe
|
63.2129 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Thu May 30 1996 11:35 | 7 |
| Well Albert just did that fan a big favor. That ball will be worth twice as
much now. Why did the fan need to hold Albert hostage? Why did he have to have
something to give something up? Me me Me of the seventies........I'd like to
believe that had he given the ball to Albert without asking for anything in
return Albert would have then turned around and given him something as a sign
of appreciation. Given his charity work that wouldn't have been out of the
relm of propability.......
|
63.2130 | I think Belle's "leadership" is tolerated because he produces | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu May 30 1996 11:44 | 11 |
|
> Why do you claim this? I've _never_ heard Belle criticized by his
> teammates or Grover for his leadership or clubhouse influence; quite
> the opposite, I've heard him praised for it.
That depends. That depends on whether you take a comment like "you
don't understand. He's not like us; he's crazy" as a compliment.
Personally, I'd be flattered...
glenn
|
63.2131 | Albert a shining example to us all... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu May 30 1996 11:52 | 13 |
|
> the fan says "Sure" just give me an autographed ball in
> return ... Albert Says "No", claims the fans in left field were
> harrassing him, and swears at the fan ... the fan tells Albert
> to pound sand ...
The fan should just tell Albert what Albert told SI, that Albert
can "kiss my <black/white/Hispanic/Asian/Eskimo/other> ass".
That way, the fan can claim that he's "misunderstood", and be
lauded for his great leadership and civic-minded spirit...
glenn
|
63.2132 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu May 30 1996 12:28 | 4 |
| > Cleveland _has_ attempted to resign Belle. They've offered him
> a very generous contract.
I thought they pulles their last offer off the table. ???
|
63.2133 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Thu May 30 1996 13:44 | 2 |
| Isnt Bonds nearing the end of his contract? Perhaps Cleveland could
sign him and leave Belle go.
|
63.2134 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 30 1996 14:19 | 7 |
|
If you were the Cleveland GM, why would you necessarily want to let Bell go?
The guy is probably most powerful offensive threat in baseball. You can
hardly take as a given that you will land Bonds.
George
|
63.2135 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu May 30 1996 16:56 | 5 |
| > If you were the Cleveland GM, why would you necessarily want to let Bell go?
Does Cleveland have enough financial resources to pay him what he wants,
*AND* satisfy their future free agents ? Do they consider him a *problem* ?
Do they have enough talent on the team to win without him ?
|
63.2136 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Thu May 30 1996 16:57 | 7 |
| >> The guy is probably most powerful offensive threat in baseball. You can
>> hardly take as a given that you will land Bonds.
Cleveland has the cash and the team to land someone like Bonds. Though
Belle is a powerful offensive threat, Bonds is a more "complete"
player. If Bonds is a lesser "powerful offensive threat" he will more
than make up for it with his fielding.
|
63.2137 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu May 30 1996 17:31 | 15 |
|
>Does Cleveland have enough financial resources to pay him what he wants,
>*AND* satisfy their future free agents ?
All of them? No.
The key ones? Possibly.
>Do they consider him a *problem* ?
Yes.
>Do they have enough talent on the team to win without him ?
Yes.
|
63.2138 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 30 1996 17:35 | 28 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2135 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
>Does Cleveland have enough financial resources to pay him what he wants,
>*AND* satisfy their future free agents ? Do they consider him a *problem* ?
>Do they have enough talent on the team to win without him ?
For Cleveland the future is now. Sure those pitching prospects look great and
maybe they will come around but that's something of a question mark which will
get answered soon enough considering the geriatric starting rotation they are
now using.
If there is money to be spent, now's the time to use it to take two or three
really good shots at the World Series from now through '98.
RE <<< Note 63.2136 by PTOSS1::SCHRAMME "Eric Schramm (412)829-0710" >>>
> Cleveland has the cash and the team to land someone like Bonds. Though
> Belle is a powerful offensive threat, Bonds is a more "complete"
> player. If Bonds is a lesser "powerful offensive threat" he will more
> than make up for it with his fielding.
Unless they have some reason to believe Bonds would play in Cleveland that's
one gigantic *IF*. Even if they do believe they could snag Bonds it might make
more sense to break the piggy bank, take Bonds and put Bell at DH.
Again, if there is money in Cleveland, now's the time to spend it.
George
|
63.2139 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 30 1996 18:25 | 9 |
|
George, I hate to tell you this, but winning is contagious. Take two
examples - Cleveland and Boston.
Who would have ever believed Dennis Martinez, Orel Hershiser or Jack
McDowell would have signed as free agents with Cleveland? It doesn't
take a genius to figure out that players want to play for winners.
What great free agents did the Red Sox attract this season? It will
only get worse for the Sox if they continue to lose.
|
63.2140 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu May 30 1996 19:04 | 11 |
| > Cleveland has the cash and the team to land someone like Bonds.
> Though Belle is a powerful offensive threat, Bonds is a more
> "complete" player. If Bonds is a lesser "powerful offensive threat"
> he will more than make up for it with his fielding.
Eric, are you trying to bait me into making a "Mr October_NOT"
comment? I refuse to be dragged into making any such comment.
billl
|
63.2141 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu May 30 1996 21:40 | 16 |
|
> Eric, are you trying to bait me into making a "Mr October_NOT"
> comment? I refuse to be dragged into making any such comment.
Don't expect it to continue if/when the Giants break through again,
though. Ironically enough, Bonds was selected in some kind of poll
of GMs earlier this year as the "most clutch hitter" in the game, and
he always has been good for those 9th-inning heroics, in the regular
season, at least...
glenn
|
63.2142 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri May 31 1996 10:18 | 10 |
|
Its standard practice that if a player wants a ball returned he
negociates with the fan, giving the guy a signed ball in return is
a small price to pay.
Ex. Ken Griffey hit his 200th HR at Fenway and wanted the ball
back. Griffey offered the kid a signed bat, signed ball, plus promised
him 4 box seat tickets to a game, when Seattle returns to Boston in
August.
Ron
|
63.2143 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 31 1996 11:00 | 5 |
|
Its a capitalistic system. I have something you want, you must pay the
asking price. If you don't want to pay, then so be it. Albert wanted
the ball but didn't want to give him an autographed ball in return, so
what's the big deal.
|
63.2144 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri May 31 1996 11:11 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2139 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> George, I hate to tell you this, but winning is contagious. Take two
> examples - Cleveland and Boston.
I'm not sure which of the points I made contradicts this.
I believe I said the Indians should sign Bell and if they have a shot at
Bonds, sigh him as well and move Bell to DH rather than letting Bell go.
Do you disagree with that? If so, what does it have to do with Boston?
George
|
63.2145 | Indian Assault and battery's | STRATA::BTOWER | | Mon Jun 03 1996 10:31 | 21 |
| Re .2094
Hey Grono, What a difference a weekend makes huh. Since you
waited till Alspurt caught MO in RBI's last week to make your "so
called impressive season' remark I figured I'd jump in right now
since Alspurt didn't hold the lead for very long. Looks like their
both just having "so called impressive seasons".
Why don't we just wait till the end of the year and see who
ends up with the best "so called impressive numbers". Cuz if MO at
least stays close, Alspurt has already done enough to blow his second
consecutive MVP award already. I know the Cleveland people love him.
I would love to have him on my team, but the majority of the rest of
the baseball public can't stand the guy. Too bad he just can't seem to
play the fame game as well as he hits balls around baseball parks, or
throws them at players, or reporters with camera's.
Nice take out of the Milwaukee second baseman. What was he half
alspurts(cheapshot) size. And hey let's not forget Tavarez body slammin
that real mean umpire. Yeah Cleveland showed a lot of class this
past weekend that's for sure.
|
63.2146 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 03 1996 11:17 | 20 |
|
> Nice take out of the Milwaukee second baseman. What was he half
> alspurts(cheapshot) size.
And he was in the basepath, and the double play was in order.
Sorry, but Belle did nothing wrong - not the greatest display of
sportsmanship, perhaps, but he _did_ succeed in breaking up the
double play.
> And hey let's not forget Tavarez body slammin
> that real mean umpire.
After the umpire came up from behind and grabbed Tavarez. Tavarez
didn't know _who_ he was body slamming; the umpire said afterwards
he would report as much.
(Not to defend Tavarez's other actions; he and Matheny both deserve
fines and/or suspensions.)
Joe
|
63.2147 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 11:22 | 4 |
|
If all players put up comparable numbers this year as last and Mo wins
the MVP, it will be a slap in Belle's face, as well as Salmon, Edgar
Martinez and Frank Thomas just to mention a few.
|
63.2148 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 03 1996 11:31 | 14 |
|
Thought:
Is Thome the best unrecognized player in the game today?
Last year he put up a season that would fit beautifully into
Schmidt's career, except that his batting average was higher.
This year, he's doing the the same thing again.
He didn't get named to the all-star game last year, or get even a
single mvp vote (while Wade Boggs did).
Joe
|
63.2149 | huh? | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jun 03 1996 11:38 | 3 |
| > Is Thome the best unrecognized player in the game today?
Who?
|
63.2150 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 03 1996 11:39 | 2 |
|
B^)
|
63.2151 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 03 1996 11:42 | 19 |
| > And he was in the basepath, and the double play was in order.
> Sorry, but Belle did nothing wrong
Most of the country doesn't agree with you Joe. Listening to talk-radio
shows, network sports reports and reading various newspaper articles,
N-O-N-E focused on Belle's break-up of the double-play. The *news*
from this incident was "further proof that this guy is a BAD ASS".
What he did, in my mind, is worse than a pitcher admitting to throwing
at a guy's head. I hope he gets suspended for at least a week...ditto
Tavarez.
The Cleveland front office can't be enjoying the press the team's been
getting lately. Hopefully, merchandise revenue will start to fall.
And maybe most fans will be rooting for the Yankees when the two teams
meet in the playoffs !!
Imagine that...
|
63.2152 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 03 1996 11:43 | 3 |
| > Is Thome the best unrecognized player in the game today?
No, Paul Sorrento is !
|
63.2153 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 11:52 | 8 |
|
Paul Sorrento couldn't even carry Thome's jock. He was easily replaced
in Cleveland by Franco, while Thome is clearly the best offensive 3B in
the American League.
As far as the Belle incident goes, who cares what the press focused on?
Belle made a good clean play at 2B. I bet the 2B gets out of the way
next time and eats the ball.
|
63.2154 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:02 | 14 |
|
I don't think Belle should be fined or suspended for what he did,
the 2nd baseman was in the basepath and deserved to get run over. Did he
deserve to get a broken jaw, NO, but Albert's intent was to jar the
ball loose not break his jaw. If he was coming in to homeplate and
ran over the catcher, breaking the cathers jaw, nothing would be
said.
The pitchers who threw at Cleveland players in retaliation should
be suspended, as well as Tavarez for throwing behind the batter, which
caused the brawl in the first place. Tavarez has to get suspended just
because he threw an umpire to the ground, it doesn't matter that he
didn't know it was an umpire..
Ron
|
63.2155 | Deliberate attempt to injure | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Best of luck, Marcus! | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:13 | 9 |
| Give me a break, PUH-LEEEEEZE! Albert's intent was to jar the ball
loose? Sure it was - and Santa will be very good to you this
Christmas. His intent was to smah that little guy into next week, and
that's nearly what he did. I only wish Vina had whipped the ball at
his head as Belle was walking off the field. In my 43 years of
watching baseball, I have NEVER seem anyone hit a second baseman
anywhere near as hard as that.
NAZZ
|
63.2156 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:15 | 4 |
|
Nice to see that NAZZ is a mind reader and knows what thought's are in
Albert's mind. PUH-LEEEEEZE! GIVE ME A BREAK, its people like you
that are part of the problem.
|
63.2157 | The brewers get involved in a lot of em' | CNTROL::SALMON | | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:26 | 3 |
| I saw a player (don't remember who) interviewed on ESPN this morning
who had a great quote. He said the 98% of all fights in the American
League involve the Brewers! Got me thinking!
|
63.2158 | what I heard | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:34 | 4 |
| I think that's supposed to read, " 98% of all fights in the American
League involve the Brew!~"...
TTom
|
63.2159 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:35 | 35 |
|
> Give me a break, PUH-LEEEEEZE! Albert's intent was to jar the ball
> loose?
That's what he's said; he _did_ bring his arm to the level Vina
had his glove.
> And he was in the basepath, and the double play was in order.
> Sorry, but Belle did nothing wrong
> Most of the country doesn't agree with you Joe. Listening to talk-radio
> shows, network sports reports and reading various newspaper articles,
> N-O-N-E focused on Belle's break-up of the double-play. The *news*
> from this incident was "further proof that this guy is a BAD ASS".
Yeah, I know that, and I'm not surprised. Belle _is_ a jerk sometimes
(and frequently at times), and so has developed a bad reputation with
the media. And so you hear _nothing_ about the fact that Matheny
did something _clearly_ illegal within the rules, tidbits about
Tavarez's actions, and the focus is on a _legal_ play by Belle.
The 2nd base umpire was quoted as saying it was a legal play; Belle
was not ejected, and did not do anything when the predictable hbp
followed.
> What he did, in my mind, is worse than a pitcher admitting to throwing
> at a guy's
OK - why?
It happens to catchers every day, and you hear _nothing_. Other
infielders routinely stay out of the path of baserunners. If Vina's
stupid enough to stand right in front of Belle with a double play in
order, he's going to be run over.
Joe
|
63.2160 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:37 | 9 |
|
RE: 98%...
Jack McDowell's the one who said it; he's clearly exaggerating, but
he does have something of a point.
All the more reason baseball needs a commissioner asap.
Joe
|
63.2161 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jun 03 1996 12:40 | 12 |
|
Look at the videotape again and try to claim that Albert was trying to jar
the ball loose. Do it without smirking.
You don't go up that high with a forearm in order to do that.
It'll be really interesting to see if he gets drilled flush in the face
with a throw anytime soon.
On the other hand, I can buy Tavarez's action of flipping the ump - the guy
did come at him from behind in the middle of a fight. But as someone stated
earlier, he *will* be sanctioned, since it was done to an umpire.
|
63.2162 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Jun 03 1996 13:00 | 16 |
|
What Belle did was not against the rules plain and simple. Stupid
incredibly, but not against the rules. The reason why Belle didn't
get tossed is only a manager can get tossed for having a pitcher
throw at an opponent not another player having a pitcher throw at one.
If anyone thinks what Belle did was just clean hard nose baseball I
think you should think again. He was quoted saying if someone throws
at him the other team will pay. The count was 3-2 and he got plunked
on the shoulder. You don't hit someone with a full count. He better
learn the game of baseball. Belle is the biggest jerk around and I
think baseball would be better off without dopes like that. Granted
he is a very talented dope but a dope none the less. Belle will get
his its just a matter of time. One of these days he'll be on first
with a bullet hit to 2nd and the SS will make an errant throw right
into his chest. One way or another he'll get whats comming to him.
|
63.2163 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 03 1996 13:19 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2148 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> Is Thome the best unrecognized player in the game today?
I guess it depends on which fans you are talking about. Someone on TV
the other day said they saw some study that selected Tim Salmon as the best
unrecognized player in the game today.
I was somewhat surprised, I thought everyone recognized Tim Salmon as one
of the best outfielders in the game today but I guess he slipped by the
people being surveyed in said study.
George
|
63.2164 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Mon Jun 03 1996 14:05 | 4 |
|
hey Jerry if some SS takes your advice, he'd better go for his head cause if
if he hits him in the chest the ball just going to bounce off and make Albert
angry.
|
63.2165 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 03 1996 14:45 | 11 |
|
Another thought for the day:
Albert Belle - the Dick Allen of the 90s?
Re: Salmon.
Hmmm... I think Salmon's underrecognized (realize, I'd have given
him the MVP last year), but not to the extent of Thome...
Joe
|
63.2166 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 15:27 | 5 |
|
Can you name the stiff (non-prospect) with the following AAA numbers:
2-2, 4 Saves, 17 games, 0.91 ERA, 29 2/3 IP (12 hits, 9 bbs), *51*
STRIKEOUTS.
|
63.2167 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 03 1996 15:38 | 6 |
| As of Friday:
W L ERA G SV IP H R ER BB SO
Shuey, Paul .... 2 2 0.94 16 3 28.2 11 3 3 9 48
George
|
63.2168 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 15:50 | 2 |
|
George, clearly the guy is a stiff.
|
63.2169 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 03 1996 15:52 | 4 |
|
Hope not, I just picked him up on my SNAL team.
George
|
63.2170 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 03 1996 17:23 | 14 |
| >> What he did, in my mind, is worse than a pitcher admitting to throwing
>> at a guy's
> OK - why?
Belle (IMO) deliberately hit the 2B in the face with his forearm...he wasn't
trying to jar the ball loose from him (unless he thought by knocking him
out cold he'd drop the ball). A pitcher will throw at a guy's head, but
Belle's forearm will be more accurate than a pitched ball, and the guy
has less time (NO TIME !) to avoid it. It was a deliberate attempt to
injure...no far from a knuckle-sandwich.
This ain't the end of it for Albert Belle. The road is going to be a
very trying time for him this year.
|
63.2171 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 03 1996 17:46 | 11 |
| Belle, Tavarez and Matheny all got 5-game suspensions.
Budig said this regarding Belle's action:
"The AL will not tolerate an act that put in serious jeopardy
the safety of a player...Albert Belle is being suspended for
five games beginning Tuesday, June 4th, since his action not
only threatened injury to an individual but also led to the
later disruption of the game."
Guess Budig didn't see Belle's forearm as good, clean baseball.
|
63.2172 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 18:21 | 3 |
|
I wonder if Selig has any vested interest in the matter - like is he
affiliated with any of the teams?
|
63.2173 | | NQOS01::nqsrv133.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Mon Jun 03 1996 19:24 | 3 |
| no, he's with the Brewers
brews (no relation)
|
63.2174 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 21:44 | 4 |
|
I rest my case. The umpires says the play at 2B was clean. Selig
who's with the Brewers (the opponents) suspends Belle anyways. What a
joke.
|
63.2175 | Albert in Denial... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Jun 03 1996 21:46 | 9 |
|
> Albert's mind. PUH-LEEEEEZE! GIVE ME A BREAK, its people like you
> that are part of the problem.
What problem? I was under the impression that there was no problem...
glenn
|
63.2176 | Grono steps in another pile... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Jun 03 1996 21:58 | 9 |
|
> I rest my case. The umpires says the play at 2B was clean. Selig
> who's with the Brewers (the opponents) suspends Belle anyways. What a
> joke.
That's Budig, not Selig, you big dummy... ;-)
glenn
|
63.2177 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 22:04 | 4 |
|
Glenn <pause>, is it true <pause>, you can not <pause> throw the long
ball any more?
|
63.2178 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Jun 03 1996 22:06 | 6 |
|
Very true... but I can still hit a little bit...
glenn
|
63.2179 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 03 1996 22:07 | 3 |
|
Glenn, is it true, you can not hit the long ball any more?
|
63.2180 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 04 1996 07:51 | 3 |
|
Selig - Budig, what's the difference? Has anyone ever seen Bud Selig
and Budig in a room at the same time?
|
63.2181 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jun 04 1996 09:21 | 12 |
| I saw the tape on the news last night and this morning and I agree with the 5
game suspension. Clearly Bell was out to deck the guy and the for arm he gave
him was not necessary to break up the play. If the Ump didn't call it then
it was a bad call.
That being said, while Bell deserves the 5 game suspension, that's all he
deserves. In addition to the suspension he's been thrown at and no doubt this
will cost him what little chance he may have had of getting MVP. That should
be more than enough, I see no reason anyone should cause Bell any further
aggravation for this incident. Once he sits out the 5 games it should be over.
George
|
63.2182 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Jun 04 1996 10:09 | 20 |
|
AND NOW A PO----EM
Ode to Joey
Joey, Joey,where you been.
Serving your suspension in the state Pen?
Running over kids,Hitting people with balls.
Breaking peoples noses and putting up walls.
Albert than Joey, Joey than AL.
Corkin your bat, don't have any pals?
MVP yes? MVP no!
Don't clear the mantle they gave it to MO.
Chap
|
63.2183 | ...and there will be more. | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 04 1996 10:23 | 3 |
| >Once he sits out the 5 games it should be over.
Until the next incident.
|
63.2184 | Tick... tick... tick... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 04 1996 10:29 | 1 |
|
|
63.2185 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jun 04 1996 10:30 | 16 |
|
All I know is that money has ruined all professional sports. As
much as I hate Cleveland and Albert BellE, these millionaire primadonas
have to stop whining and complaining. As I said in a earlier note, if
it happened at home plate, NOTHING would have been done. I saw the
replay about 10 times yesterday, Vina had his glove up around his
face. Albert tried knocking the ball out of his glove and pushed Vina's
own arm/glove into his own face.
I'd rather watch Albert BellE bowl someone over playing aggressive
baseball, then a lazy bum like Jose Canseco. Canseco probably would
have been taking his helmet off and walking off the field when he got
tagged.
I can see Tavarez getting 5 games because there is no excuse for
touching an umpire/ref in any sport.
Ron
|
63.2186 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 04 1996 10:35 | 25 |
|
> "The AL will not tolerate an act that put in serious jeopardy
> the safety of a player...Albert Belle is being suspended for
> five games beginning Tuesday, June 4th, since his action not
> only threatened injury to an individual but also led to the
> later disruption of the game."
If he truly believes this, then there should be suspensions handed out
whenever a player slides hard into second base, or runs over a
catcher.
I still think this is ridiculous. I've seen the replay five or so
times now, and do _not_ believe that it's clear that Belle's intent
was to do bodily harm, rather than to break up the double play.
>Guess Budig didn't see Belle's forearm as good, clean baseball.
I'm not sure it _is_ clean baseball. But it is legal baseball, and
therefore should _not_ result in a suspension. To read into Belle's
action an intent to hurt Vina is unreasonable.
FWIW, I was happy to see the other suspensions; if anything, I
think Tavarez's was a bit light, but I'm not going to complain.
Joe
|
63.2187 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 04 1996 10:37 | 9 |
|
> I can see Tavarez getting 5 games because there is no excuse for
> touching an umpire/ref in any sport.
Right; and given the unintentional nature of the incident, a light
penalty was in order. Given that he's a pitcher, I expected about 7
games.
Joe
|
63.2188 | Albert's rep cost him 5 | STRATA::BTOWER | | Tue Jun 04 1996 10:49 | 19 |
| re: .2185
Mike Lynch said much the same thing on the Channel 5 sports
last night. He said for years Pete Rose was commended for such plays.
He also pointed out that earlier in the game Albert was tagged out and
the double play completed. He made sure that it didn't happen a second
time. His opinion was it was a very hard hit but CLEAN and the only
reason he got a 5 game suspension was because of all his past
indiscretions.
Bob Lobel on channel 4 was on the other side of the fence and
felt Belle deserved even more of a suspension. Said if the Milwaukee
guy who charged the mound got 5 then Albert deserved at least double.
The more I watch the play Albert certainly had every right to
the basepath and wiped the guy completely out. I feel he was definitely
trying to hurt the guy not just jar the ball loose. Although, I also agree
that nobody else in baseball would have gotten a five game suspension
for it. Maybe 1 but not 5.
|
63.2189 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jun 04 1996 10:52 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2185 by SNAX::ERICKSON >>>
> All I know is that money has ruined all professional sports. As
> much as I hate Cleveland and Albert BellE, these millionaire primadonas
> have to stop whining and complaining.
Where is the relationship between money and the forarm that Bell gave the
infielder? I just don't see it. Was it money that made Ty Cobb slide into 2nd
with his spikes up? And if money does this why don't all the players play this
way?
Baseball players have been getting paid to play baseball since 1869 and in
that time I've seen no evidence that it makes guys play dirty baseball. If
anything baseball is much cleaner now than it was in the 19th century when
the players were making little more than a middle class wage.
George
|
63.2190 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 04 1996 11:03 | 9 |
| I don't recall Rose going DIRECTLY to someone's face with a forearm
while trying to breakup a doubleplay or a play at the plate. From
the very first instant I saw the replay it was clear to me that
Belle threw his forearm at Vina's face and there was intent to
inflict pain. You can watch it 100 times, but if you believe that's
clean play you're going to see it that way.
I have no problem with spikes up or burying your shoulder into a
guy. But what Belle did ain't part of the game...rules or no rules.
|
63.2191 | it must be the haid | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 04 1996 11:15 | 12 |
| No I don't believe it's a clean play. Only that it's within the MLB
rules to allow this. I also think it was a real cheap shot.
I have no doubt that the forearm was intended both for the face and to
inflict bodily harm. I have no idea what Rose's motivation was in taking
out Fosse but like I said, he crushed him worse than Joey did his man and
we called it hussle.
And it's interesting to read that you think spiking is a part of the game
while forearms to the haid aint. How 'bout spiking to the head?
TTom
|
63.2192 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Jun 04 1996 11:15 | 12 |
|
I watch about 30 games a year and catch highlights of the games almost
every night (what would I do without ESPN 8^) Albert Belle did not
deserve 5 games for the incident. He did deserve a leave without pay
though.
The question becomes "did he get 5 games because of his past?" The
answer IMO is definately yes and rightfully so. If 1 and 2 game
suspensions don't "fix" the behavior, then make it longer.
Marc
|
63.2193 | Charlie Hussle....that's the difference | CNTROL::SALMON | | Tue Jun 04 1996 11:25 | 13 |
| There is a difference between Pete Rose and Albert Belle. When Rose hit
somebody, it was "always" a clean hit. I believe Rose ran into Ray
Fosse on that play at the plate during the All star game. The guy was
never the same after that, but Rose came into him head first. He didn't
throw any forarms.
I never liked the guy myself. I always thought of him as somewhat of
a phony (RUNNING to 1st base every time he walked), but I think the game
could use guys like him today. Sad to see guys like this commanding
multi millions of dollars. It was a legal take out, but it was cheap!
I also believe that Belle was given a 5 game suspension due to the fact
that he (allegedly) told his pitcher to throw at an opposing player.
In the good old days he wouldn't have had to!!!!!!
|
63.2194 | No question that the rules are open to brutal basepath play | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 04 1996 11:30 | 20 |
|
I'm trying to find a rule in the book that prohibits, say, a runner
(or any player) from hauling back and punching a fielder in the face,
but I can't find it. There's some general language around a "flagrant
offense" in Section 9, The Umpire (I think Belle's play qualifies,
that was a football play, almost never seen in baseball to such a
gross extent) but nothing in the way of specifics (such as, is the
umpire allowed to award the DP, etc.). It's possible that the umpire
could award the DP based on an interpretation of the general
interference rules, but these rules are more concerned with allowing
the fielder room to catch the ball and make a play, and say nothing
specific about the fielder's recourse against an armed assault.
Perhaps the "baseball is boring" crowd has an opening to spice up
the game, without changing the rules.
Any additional help?
glenn
|
63.2195 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 04 1996 12:14 | 6 |
| >And it's interesting to read that you think spiking is a part of the game
>while forearms to the haid aint. How 'bout spiking to the head?
Vina had no chance to avoid that blow to the head. Spikes-up sliding
is far less threatening to the health of the fielder and usually can
be avoided.
|
63.2196 | Are you shaking your bleeping head at me? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 04 1996 12:17 | 10 |
|
> Glenn <pause>, is it true <pause>, you can not <pause> throw the long
> ball any more?
BTW, WTF were you talking about here? I'm struggling to remember the
last time I was required to throw the bomb...
glenn
|
63.2197 | OK if avoidable? | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 04 1996 12:19 | 11 |
| Wail, based on what I saw, Vina coulda avoided the forearm and the whole
incident.
Firsted of all he knows Joey is a complete jerk who wouldn't think twice
about taking someone out. He was involved in a similar play previously in
the game and thirdly, after Joey was hit, he shoulda knowed something was
going to happen.
Maybe he shoulda jumped up and spiked ol' Al...
TTom
|
63.2198 | I go with the suspension off one quick look | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Jun 04 1996 12:23 | 7 |
| Another opinion. Belle's shot was not part of the game and the
suspension was correct. There is a section appended to the rulebook
(casebook) which provides furthur information but I don't have it.
Essentially the problem was the way Belle did it and it is an opinion
case and I hope Budig sought the opinion of former players with
objective judgement - say Bill Lee, Gorman Thomas :)
|
63.2199 | | AWECIM::RUSSO | claimin! | Tue Jun 04 1996 12:32 | 7 |
|
Actually, Glenn makes the long throw quite well, from deep SS on a
full-sized baseball field. You can find out for yourself, Paul, join
the Cubs! As treasurer of the team, I know that the price of admission
is going down with every minute.....
Dave
|
63.2200 | "Led to later disruption"-- what the hell is that? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 04 1996 12:36 | 9 |
|
I will say this though-- that Gene Budig's comment that Belle's
suspension is in at least part due to the "later disruption of the
game" is farcical and clearly in error. Belle should not be held
responsible for later carnage escalated by other hotheads in
the time-honored tradition of baseball...
glenn
|
63.2201 | ex | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Tue Jun 04 1996 13:14 | 16 |
| >> Albert Belle - the Dick Allen of the 90s?
Joe, I was thinking that just the other day. Richie "call me Dick"
Allen was another player long on talent and short on etiquette.
I'm probably the only person in the notesfile that didn't see the play
where Belle ran into the infielder. There is a difference between
being competitive and poor sportsmanship.
I agree with the comment that Belle is in for a long season on the
road. If he wants to carry the burden of being a martyr to justify the
'world against Belle' attitude he maintains, he will continue on the
path he's currently on. Too bad for baseball...and too bad for Belle.
Cleveland could very quickly become the team America loves to hate.
Ted
|
63.2202 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 04 1996 14:42 | 16 |
|
>Vina had no chance to avoid that blow to the head. Spikes-up sliding
>is far less threatening to the health of the fielder and usually can
>be avoided.
Sure he did. The _standard_ play in that situation is a slap tag,
not standing dead still in the basepath. If Belle _still_ goes
after him, then there's no argument - Belle's out of line, gets
tossed, and suspended, and clearly deserves it.
But any number of people have watched the replay, and there's no
clear consensus as to whether Belle raised his arms to be at the
level of Vina's glove, or whether he raised his arms to maximize
the impact of his blow.
Joe
|
63.2203 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 04 1996 14:48 | 9 |
| Belle, Tavarez and Matheny all have appealed their suspensions. Usually
these appeals are heard the next time the player's team visits NY.
This could work out well for the Yanks, as Cleveland comes to Yankee
Stadium next week for 4 games and, given these appeals never succeed,
Bad-Albert and Tavarez might appeal themselves out of the Yanks series.
What a shame. I want to see what happens when Bad-Albert takes his
position in LF. I don't think these bleacher-bums will be deterred by
a baseball. :^)
|
63.2204 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 04 1996 17:04 | 10 |
|
re: .2188
Bruce was Bob Lobel the biggest freaking alcoholic on TV sober or
tanked when he said Belle deserved a big suspension. If you want to
dump on Belle, dump on Lobel! The guy is supposed to be a role model
as a newscaster, but he's a freaking disgrace. I went to one Red Sox
game and he had some kids thrown out of the near front row seats in
front of him when they moved down late in the game. Loser!
|
63.2205 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 04 1996 17:06 | 9 |
|
re: .2195
>Vina had no chance to avoid that blow to the head. Spikes-up sliding
>is far less threatening to the health of the fielder and usually can
>be avoided.
False. Vina could have gotten out of the way resulting in no out.
|
63.2206 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jun 04 1996 17:25 | 10 |
|
All I keep remember is when Marty Barret of the Red Sox was put
into the same exact predicament as Vina. Barret use to always make
sure he could slap tag the runner and get out of the way, if not
he threw the ball to second base.
Its also Vina's responsibility to either charge the ball or play
back a little bit, so that he is not fielding the grounder while
in the basepath.
Ron
|
63.2207 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 04 1996 17:56 | 20 |
|
The "Vina could have gotten out of the way" argument is a ruse.
Debate the play on its own merits. Just because a quick defender
might be able to get out of the way of a Muhammed Ali jab, does
not make the jab legal (in baseball). Just because Vina could
have been smarter up against an opponent like Ali, does not make
the play legal (in baseball).
There's no comparison with a player getting spiked. As long as
the runner is in the basepath, there has never been any question
about the legality of going shoe-to-shoe, shoe-to-leg with a
fielder. It's universally accepted as part of the game. The
elbow-to-head, forearm-to-head, is at the very least subject to
the umpire's judgment (umpire's judgment is where Budig has
something of a credibility problem-- but the umpire doesn't always
get it right, either, and the league does have the power of review
in meting out suspensions).
glenn
|
63.2208 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 04 1996 17:57 | 4 |
|
Debate the play on its own merits? Okay, it was a legal play, no
suspension. To suspend Belle for what happened later in the game is
ridiculous.
|
63.2209 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 04 1996 18:00 | 14 |
|
> Okay, it was a legal play, no suspension.
Not in the opinion of Emperor Gene Budig, at least (or in mine, FWIW).
> To suspend Belle for what happened later in the game is ridiculous.
Agreed. Belle'd be smart to appeal entirely on these grounds, for
whatever part of the suspension the later results were responsible
for.
glenn
|
63.2210 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 04 1996 21:11 | 7 |
|
This discussion is ridiculous. Vina clearly could have gotten out of
the way - he chose not to. He clearly had the glove around his face
and Belle's. If I'm going to collide into someone with a glove up near
my face or throat, i'm not going to let him just slap me in the head.
I'm bringing my arms up to knock out the ball and protect myself. The
play was legal, period.
|
63.2211 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 05 1996 10:59 | 3 |
| > This discussion is ridiculous.
Yeah, let's save time, energy and disk space for Belle's next *crime*.
|
63.2212 | Vina vicious in his glovework in area of face/throat... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Jun 05 1996 11:12 | 13 |
|
> This discussion is ridiculous. Vina clearly could have gotten out of
> the way - he chose not to. He clearly had the glove around his face
> and Belle's. If I'm going to collide into someone with a glove up near
> my face or throat, i'm not going to let him just slap me in the head.
> I'm bringing my arms up to knock out the ball and protect myself.
Hahahahahaha... Albert was acting in "self-defense". "Are you
threatening me?" with that 2B's mitt, he said to little Vina...
glenn
|
63.2213 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Wed Jun 05 1996 11:13 | 14 |
|
I realize that one side is not going to convince the other side, but
what the hell...
The glove WAS NOT near anyones face, it was chest high. Watch the
replay on your "Cleveland Indian Excuse VCR" and you'll see that
Belle's arms were a full foot above the glove. If Belle was truely
trying to hit the ball out of the glove, how come he couldn't get
within a foot of the glove but can hit a 3 inch baseball right in the
middle with a large stick? Maybe he should just carry the bat around
the basepads.
Marc
|
63.2214 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 05 1996 12:00 | 15 |
| Ron, are you sure about the position of the second baseman vis a vis
collisions. I believe there are a number of casebook interpretations
and they are essentially taught in the minor leagues as conventions of
baseball or "how it's done".
It is my belief that the second baseman, if fielding a batted ball,
when he establishes a position, even if on the line, can not be
interfered with by the runner. In this case Belle arrived right about
the time Vina fielded the ball and would probably have been okay if he
just kept running into Vina. What was not okay was the obvious forearm
shiver and the ump who okayed the play was wrong. He should have
called it a double play for illegal interference.
But that one play shouldn't merit more than a small fine except
possibly for any injury - and Vina was out there the next day.
|
63.2216 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 05 1996 14:14 | 24 |
|
> I realize that one side is not going to convince the other side, but
> what the hell...
>
> The glove WAS NOT near anyones face, it was chest high. Watch the
> replay on your "Cleveland Indian Excuse VCR" and you'll see that
> Belle's arms were a full foot above the glove.
I don't have the incident taped, making it rather difficult to view
again, but that was _not_ what I saw; OTOH, my memory's rather
faulty.
And, personally, I'm not trying to make excuses for Belle. He's
done a lot of stupid things in the past; I've never denied that.
And while I may be a fan of the Tribe, I don't think that blinds me
to their faults. But -based upon what I have seen and heard of this
incident- I do not believe Belle was in any way deserving of a
suspension.
As an aside - looking up the hitting and pitching stats for the
Yankees yesterday, I noticed something rather scary - Chicago's
got the best offense _and_ pitching in the league right now.
Joe
|
63.2217 | From the ashes... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Jun 05 1996 14:34 | 15 |
|
> As an aside - looking up the hitting and pitching stats for the
> Yankees yesterday, I noticed something rather scary - Chicago's
> got the best offense _and_ pitching in the league right now.
And you said it couldn't be done. But, the point was made, on
the offensive side, for any team that has Frank Thomas on its
roster, build a lineup, and runs will come.
But let's face it, baseball is just too unpredictable for even
the stat analysts to prognosticate, at least not with near the
reliability they like to assert.
glenn
|
63.2218 | Umps Lost Control ! | POWDML::DFARRELL | Dennis Farrell -- MSO2-3/G2 | Wed Jun 05 1996 15:10 | 62 |
| Well, after seeing the replay of the incident about 3 times and after
reading ALL the replies in this note, here is my opinion on the whole
mess:
1. Vina made a dumb play (twice). Both times he should have either
slapped a tag on Belle or thrown the ball to second to get [at
least] the force out and a possible DP (with Murray running your
chances are pretty good).
2. This is the biggie in my mind --- the umpires (especially Brinkman
the home plate umpire) totally lost control of the game and let the
incidents escalate on their own. I say this because:
- After the Milwaukee pitcher threw 2 pitches over/behind Belle
then plunked him with another one, Brinkman should have given
the Milwaukee pitcher, catcher and the Manager the heave-ho.
There is no excuse for not taking action on what was clearly
(in my mind) an intentional HBP. If the ump took control and
ejected the right individuals, MAYBE Joey/Albert would not have
tried to remove Vina's body from his head. (That's a big MAYBE,
given the history of the walking time bomb himself !!)
- If Albert/Joey still did what he did to Vina, he also should have
been run from the game -- right away with no hesitation (rules or
no rules). The biggest reason Belle did what he did was to "get
even" for being hit with a pitch. Sure, he plays the game hard
and some say he's "too focused" on baseball but what he did was
malicious and uncalled for (even though Vina made the above
mentioned dumb play).
- Tavares showed no remorse after wrestling Brinkman to the ground.
Sure, the ump came up from behind him but if you watch the tape,
Tavares was in Brinkman's face arguing even after he knew it was
an umpire he had thrown to the ground. Suspension justified in this
case --- should have been more than 5 games.
Summary:
- The umps blew it. If they took control when they should have, this
incident may have never happened.
- Belle is an idiot. An excellent player yes, but a moron who is BAD
for the game. Unfortunately (as someone said earlier) I'm afraid
this isn't the last incident Belle will be involved in which will
place another black mark on him and on the game.
- Cleveland management has to be worried about the state
of affairs on their team. It's too bad this talented team has
managed to find ways to make it the most hated team (by fans) in
baseball.
- John Hart has done an outstanding job building a winner
and I'm sure he doesn't want to see it all go up in smoke. Hart
and Hargrove have a responsibility to "put a lid" on their team's
behavior and talk to them about class, dignity and professionalism.
A lot of bad actors (Murray, Lofton, Ramirez et al) on that club.
Maybe it would be best if they just let Albert and some of his
cronies take a walk at the end of the year. There is still enough
talent there to win a lot of ballgames.
DF
|
63.2219 | raiders of baseball? | THEMAX::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Wed Jun 05 1996 16:15 | 3 |
| All the tribe needs is Marge....
Tim
|
63.2220 | a team that doesn't know how to act like a winner | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 05 1996 16:22 | 13 |
| > - John Hart has done an outstanding job building a winner
> and I'm sure he doesn't want to see it all go up in smoke.
> Maybe it would be best if they just let Albert and some of his
> cronies take a walk at the end of the year. There is still enough
> talent there to win a lot of ballgames.
My point all along. For an organization with such a long history of
failure and little-to-no fan support, having this emergence to the AL's
top position tainted by some bad asses must be pissin' the front office
off. This is NOT the type of work John Hart wants to be dealing with,
I'm sure.
|
63.2221 | Sound familiar | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed Jun 05 1996 16:34 | 1 |
| Cleveland = Loserville USA.
|
63.2222 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jun 05 1996 16:53 | 4 |
|
> All the tribe needs is Marge....
Thank you, no.
|
63.2223 | Buckeye HOF: Groaner, Marge, Sam Shepard, Woody Hayes... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Jun 05 1996 17:09 | 10 |
|
>> All the tribe needs is Marge....
>
> Thank you, no.
Marge is another one of those "friendly" Midwesterners...
glenn
|
63.2224 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 05 1996 18:14 | 7 |
| How about Art Schlichter for Sam Shepard - jury reversed verdict in
second trial right?
The famous fixed game involving Cobb,Speaker, Wood and the famous
Leonard letter involved Cleveland.
All in all not all that much one way or the other.
|
63.2225 | ... and the Sox ain't winnning anything anytime soon! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jun 05 1996 21:32 | 9 |
|
.2218
Complete and utter non-sense. How do you figure Manny Ramirez, Eddie
Murray and Kenny Lofton to be bad actors. I guess their bad actors
because they're good and they're on a good team - and they know it. If
that's the case, Clemens is a bad actor... except, Clemens also has the
fact that he's a baby going for him as well - since he always blames
the umps.
|
63.2226 | Belle's just another bully | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | No sleep till....... | Thu Jun 06 1996 01:22 | 5 |
| All Belle does is pick on guys too small to protect themselves. He
doesn't have the b*lls to do something like that against the Red Sox because
Jose Canseco is twice his size and would bench press Belle if he tried it. Also
Cleveland fans, check the stats, Mo's numbers are better.
Belle deserved the five games, end of story.
|
63.2227 | Belle's 95 numbers were 5X better | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 07:11 | 5 |
|
Also Boston fans, the seasons not over. I guess when your team is
helplessly and forever a loser, its good to compare individual stats.
p.s. Belle has more HRs.
|
63.2228 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 07:20 | 4 |
|
Indians re-sign Swindell. While he's not the pitcher he used to be,
maybe all he needed was a change of scenery. Its a no lose situation
for the tribe.
|
63.2229 | He's still just a bully | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | No sleep till....... | Thu Jun 06 1996 07:32 | 8 |
|
Let him try to run over Jose.
|
63.2230 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 06 1996 09:39 | 20 |
|
> Also Cleveland fans, check the stats, Mo's numbers are better.
OK, here you go:
Mo Vaughn: .703 SLG, .459 OBP
Albert Belle: .722 SLG, .424 OBP
Belle has 3 SB (0 CS), Vaughn 0/0.
Vaughn's numbers, this year _are_ clearly better, since a point of
OBP is worth more than a point of SLG.
McGwire's numbers are better than Vaughn's, but in fewer at bats.
Hmmm... if the season ended today, Vaughn would be a deserving MVP,
unlike last year.
Joe
|
63.2231 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 09:50 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2230 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> Hmmm... if the season ended today, Vaughn would be a deserving MVP,
> unlike last year.
... that is if MVP were based on offensive stats.
But since MVP is based on who the sports press thinks is the greatest star
and greatest all around guy, Bell doesn't stand a lobster's chance at a New
England clam bake.
George
|
63.2232 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 10:46 | 3 |
|
Well, since George Bell retired about 5 years ago, its irrelevant.
Lets try to stick with the Vaughn - Belle discussion please.
|
63.2233 | and the winner is? | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 10:47 | 12 |
|
Time to change the subject. I see Chicago is only 1 game
back of the tribe. Have they played each other this'd year yet.
What the head to head record. Is Chicago playing over thier heads?
Looks like a good race shaping up.
Shark
|
63.2234 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 10:49 | 2 |
|
Chicago is probably the second best team in the AL this year.
|
63.2235 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 10:51 | 11 |
|
Is it true that other than the AAA Tigers, the Sox have the worst
record in the AL. Pretty pathetic for a team that made it to the
playoff last year (granted the Indians slapped the crap out of them
as usual - Sox have never beated the Indians in the playoffs).
My guess is that all the talk we'll hear from this point on is how
Mo's numbers are better than Albert's... and when Albert passes him up
like we know he will, they'll be some other lame story - like Clemens
is better than the Indians #5 starter or something like that.
|
63.2236 | Why Can't They See How Lucky They Are ?? | POWDML::DFARRELL | Dennis Farrell -- MSO2-3/G2 | Thu Jun 06 1996 10:51 | 35 |
| re .2225
Paul,
I didn't say they (Murray, Lofton, Ramirez) weren't good players but
you hit the nail on the head by saying "they're good and they're on a
good team - AND THEY KNOW IT."
I'm not naive enough to believe everything I read in the print media
or believe everything I hear in the electronic media but over the past
2-3 months I have been hearing a consistent message from Peter Gammons
and other "credible" media types and the message is this --- the
personalities and attitudes on the Indians have managed to turn them
into one of the most hated teams in baseball (by non-Cleveland fans and
most all of the media). Last year, they were somewhat of a Cinderella
story because they rose to the top after so many years of being on the
bottom.
Now, perhaps we can argue that success and media scrutiny/pressure has
created this monster. That doesn't excuse the fact that Eddie ("the
whole world is against me") Murray and whiners like Lofton and Ramirez
behave the way they do to the press.
My comment about Hart and Hargrove taking some responsibility and
talking to these guys about being professional and humble is
appropriate. I'm getting real tired of hearing people like Joe Morgan
(not the Walpole Joe) and other morons defending the behavior of Belle
and the boys.
Is there any humility and class left in professional sports ? Sadly,
I'm beginning to think the answer is "No" !
DF
|
63.2237 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 10:53 | 3 |
|
The fact is, plain and simple, the best team is always hated. Do you
think teams liked the Yankees when they were winning?
|
63.2238 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 10:56 | 7 |
|
Okay Dennis, you don't believe everything you read. I'll take that as
a given. Now tell me about all of the incidents that support this
claim -
"That doesn't excuse... [why or how] whiners like Lofton and Ramirez
behave the way they do to the press"
|
63.2239 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 06 1996 10:56 | 38 |
|
>> Hmmm... if the season ended today, Vaughn would be a deserving MVP,
>> unlike last year.
> ... that is if MVP were based on offensive stats.
Ummm - why do you say this? My choices for "deserving MVPs" are
based upon offensive and defensive stats, plus such things as
leadership and team perfromance where there's a close case.
Vaughn's a deserving MVP so far this year, period. He was _not_
a deserving MVP last year, period (IMHO, of course).
> But since MVP is based on who the sports press thinks is the greatest star
>and greatest all around guy, Bell doesn't stand a lobster's chance at a New
>England clam bake.
Well, Jay Bell doesn't really stand a chance anyway.
BTW, though, the MVP is officially based on:
1. Actual value of a player to his team, that is, strength of
offense and defense.
2. Number of games played.
3. General character, disposition, loyalty and effort.
4. Former winners are eligible.
5. Members of the committee may vote for more than one
member of a team.
You are also urged to give serious consideration to all your
selections, from 1 to 10. A 10th-place vote can influence the
outcome of an election. You must fill in all 10 places on
your ballot.
Keep in mind that all players are eligible for the MVP, and
that includes pitchers and designated hitters.
Joe
|
63.2240 | Tribe behaved as if they were too big for the World Series | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 06 1996 11:06 | 10 |
|
> The fact is, plain and simple, the best team is always hated. Do you
> think teams liked the Yankees when they were winning?
No, while the Indians were putting their arrogance on national public
display in last year's World Series, many were more than happy to see
the Braves assert themselves as the less-hated, best team...
glenn
|
63.2241 | it's the fans | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 06 1996 11:11 | 12 |
| I don't hate teams, just some of the fans.
The Braves were nothing for a long time. You could go to the game and be
sure of getting any kinda seat you cared to purchase. Then they started
winning and all of a sudden, ever body's a freakin Braves fan.
So naturally, I was rootin for the Indians.
And I kinda like Albert Belle, too. Sure he's a_asshole but I like the
way he gets ever body all fired up.
TTom
|
63.2242 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 11:30 | 12 |
| <<< Note 63.2241 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>
>The Braves were nothing for a long time. You could go to the game and be
>sure of getting any kinda seat you cared to purchase. Then they started
>winning and all of a sudden, ever body's a freakin Braves fan.
That's for sure. Back in '91 we went to DECUS in Atlanta and we could hear
them singing the National Anthem when we bought our tickets but we got lower
deck just past 1st base anyway. The next year when they went and tried to get
tickets 2 days before the game they were already sold out.
George
|
63.2243 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Jun 06 1996 11:31 | 4 |
|
Groaner, don't sell Cleveland short. They are still the second best
team in the AL this year.
|
63.2244 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Thu Jun 06 1996 13:32 | 8 |
| <<< Note 63.2228 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> Indians re-sign Swindell. While he's not the pitcher he used to be,
> maybe all he needed was a change of scenery. Its a no lose situation
> for the tribe.
Chuckle....
|
63.2245 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:01 | 3 |
|
The Braves weren't arrogant? How about Javy Lopez's deep flyout that
he was convinced was a HR, so he starts into his HR trot/celebration.
|
63.2246 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:03 | 4 |
|
Leave it to George to bust right into the discussion on how all the
Braves fans came out of the woodwork when they started to win. What
was that saying? "That's like calling the kettle black"!
|
63.2247 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:13 | 8 |
| Paul, who lives in Lowell where the Indians never played,
When I was at that game in late spring of 1991 someone asked me if I was
a Braves fan because I was from Atlanta. I told them no, I'm a Braves fan
because they are from Boston. Who ever it was said something like "Oh yeh,
I heard they were from there".
George, who lives in Boston where the Braves once Played
|
63.2248 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:14 | 9 |
|
> The Braves weren't arrogant? How about Javy Lopez's deep flyout that
> he was convinced was a HR, so he starts into his HR trot/celebration.
...and then there was all that gratuitous celebratin' on the field
of play when the mighty Indians were sent packin'...
glenn
|
63.2249 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:19 | 10 |
| Yeah, real arrogance that Lopez has, the whole country turned on the
Braves and now they are the second most hated team in Baseball.
Must have been all the media in attendance that distracted him from
seeing that the ball was caught.
There is no comaprison between the two organizations in regards to
"Class", so don't even try.
UMDan
|
63.2250 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:25 | 10 |
| The thing I remember about Lopez was that play where he signaled Pena to
pump up that high fastball so he could pick one of the Indians off 1st base.
For a 2nd year guy he did an outstanding job behind the plate in that series.
But there is little doubt the "I can't stand any athlete that doesn't wear
sack cloth" crowd will find some excuse to be miserable about any athlete's
good fortune but so what? The real fans could care less. The Braves and Indians
are both great teams and they deserve to be where they are today.
George
|
63.2251 | faint praise | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:31 | 4 |
|
The Indians "deserve" to be in Cleveland? Main, what a slur.
TTom
|
63.2252 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:36 | 4 |
|
What I had in mind was being A.L. Champs, not being in Cleveland.
George
|
63.2253 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:40 | 8 |
|
> What I had in mind was being A.L. Champs, not being in Cleveland.
Yeah, that was a sentence too cruel even for the Browns...
glenn
|
63.2254 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 14:51 | 7 |
| Re <<< Note 63.2253 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Hardball, good ol' country" >>>
> Yeah, that was a sentence too cruel even for the Browns...
Never more,
George
|
63.2255 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:05 | 7 |
|
Better yet, you could be from Boston and have no hope of winning any
championship for the next 75 years - and have your car stolen. I
mean this is the home of auto theft, and poor drivers capital of the
USA... not to mention the bad chowder... the only thing Boston has
going for it is Cambridge, but since they stole the name from the UK,
that doesn't really count as part of Boston.
|
63.2256 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:10 | 4 |
|
Cambridge was never part of Boston.
George
|
63.2257 | sox sip, mo does not hustle, clemens is done | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:10 | 3 |
|
p.s. only in Boston are the Indians a hated team because the Sox fans
are jealous. Indians merchandise sales is in the top 3 nationwide.
|
63.2258 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:12 | 11 |
|
> Better yet, you could be from Boston and have no hope of winning any
> championship for the next 75 years - and have your car stolen. I
> mean this is the home of auto theft, and poor drivers capital of the
> USA...
Or there's Cleveland, Halloween vandalism capital of the free world...
glenn
|
63.2259 | Wahoo... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:14 | 10 |
|
> p.s. only in Boston are the Indians a hated team because the Sox fans
> are jealous. Indians merchandise sales is in the top 3 nationwide.
Usually an indication of widespread appeal to juvenile deliquent
punk/gang contingents and/or a racist logo...
glenn
|
63.2260 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:15 | 2 |
|
Euclid was never part of Cleveland.
|
63.2261 | wrong geometry | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:17 | 0 |
63.2262 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:17 | 3 |
|
Cleveland never lived in Euclid.
Euclid never lived in Cleveland.
|
63.2263 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:20 | 3 |
|
O.J. never liked Clark.
Clark never like o.j.
|
63.2264 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:22 | 6 |
|
He's gone into a spin.
This can't be good.
George
|
63.2265 | probably also has other prejudices as well | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:22 | 5 |
|
re: .2259
What we have here is an angry, judgemental person. Next time look in
the mirror before you point fingers.
|
63.2266 | very erie | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:23 | 0 |
63.2267 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:25 | 3 |
|
Rumor has it that the terminal tower was named after Bruce Tower. Is
this true?
|
63.2268 | Open Circuit? | STRATA::BTOWER | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:30 | 3 |
| Grono, Someone put somethin in your afternoon java? Mind clueing us in
on what the ____ your blabbering about in the last few notes. Or take
a powder or something, your latch has unlatched 8>).
|
63.2269 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jun 06 1996 16:49 | 3 |
| "There is no royal road to Cleveland"
Euclid 333 bc
|
63.2270 | sine of the times | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 06 1996 17:07 | 1 |
| That Euclid guy was always looking for some angle...
|
63.2271 | | CHEFS::7A1_GRN | Go GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic team | Fri Jun 07 1996 06:42 | 9 |
| .2255
>but since they stole the name from the UK, that doesn't really count
as part of Boston.
So was Cleveland stolen, so that doesn't really count as part of the U.S.
CHARLEY:^}
|
63.2272 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Fri Jun 07 1996 08:03 | 8 |
| Cambridge is the only thing that Boston has going for it?
Now THAT is pathetic.
Put up a big fence around the PRC and let em rent control
themselves etc to their hearts desire...
daryll
|
63.2273 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Fri Jun 07 1996 10:15 | 5 |
| Didn't Cambridge vote out the rent control a few years back?
Brokers,Lawyer,Doctors etc were renting a lot of the units.
If Cleveland is land of the Cleves just what's a cleve? Is it like a
Boer?
|
63.2274 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 07 1996 11:39 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2273 by MKOTS3::BREEN >>>
> Didn't Cambridge vote out the rent control a few years back?
> Brokers,Lawyer,Doctors etc were renting a lot of the units.
No, what happened was that we had a referendum on the Massachusetts State
ballot for a law that would prevent towns like Cambridge from being allowed
to decide for themselves if they wanted rent control. I believe it passed
but it's not clear if it's been implemented yet.
George
|
63.2275 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 07 1996 11:51 | 2 |
|
If Boston is really a ton of bos, what is "bos" anyways?
|
63.2276 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 07 1996 11:54 | 4 |
|
da bos is da guy dat tell yah what tah do.
George
|
63.2277 | Bruce is da Boss | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 07 1996 11:54 | 1 |
|
|
63.2278 | follow the rules, huh! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 07 1996 12:39 | 3 |
|
"Boss" is not "Bos"... an extra letter was added... just like "Cleve"
is not "Clever" or "Cleave"!
|
63.2279 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 07 1996 12:53 | 10 |
| Boston was named after a town in England which got it's name centuries ago.
Most likely you would have to look at Middle or Old English for the meanings
of "Bos" and "ton". I'd guess "Town" for "ton".
Old English was prior to the Norman Invasion by William the Conqueror and
the Battle of Hastings in 1066 AD and Middle English would have been the
next few centuries after that.
George
|
63.2280 | OK then | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 07 1996 12:53 | 4 |
| Blame in on the bossanova which has nothing to do with that school in
Philly, neither...
and how much is Brian Bos worth?
|
63.2281 | bicentennial? | CHEFS::7A1_GRN | Go GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic team | Fri Jun 07 1996 13:22 | 7 |
| Cleveland was named after Moses Cleaveland who worked for the
Connecticut Land Company. The town plans were completed in 1796.
If you knew that already, tell me to shut up.
CHARLEY
|
63.2282 | mistake | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 07 1996 13:26 | 3 |
| > -< bicentennial? >-
No, I think Cleveland passed one of them anti-gay ordinances...
|
63.2283 | | CHEFS::7A1_GRN | Go GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic team | Fri Jun 07 1996 13:27 | 4 |
| Ha Ha!
CHARLEY
|
63.2284 | and on this bandwagon, ... | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 07 1996 13:28 | 5 |
| > <<< Note 63.2283 by CHEFS::7A1_GRN "Go GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic team" >>>
BTW, Charley, great p-name. I just noticed it.
TTom
|
63.2285 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Fri Jun 07 1996 13:50 | 1 |
| Cleveland would/should never be confused with Cleverland.
|
63.2286 | what I heard, I think | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 07 1996 13:54 | 2 |
| Wasn't it Eldridge Cleverland who said that if'n you're not part of the
solution you're part of the problem?
|
63.2287 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 07 1996 13:58 | 5 |
| No, I think it was Beaver Cleaver who said if you are not part of the
problem then you'd have no use for the solution.
Or something like that,
George
|
63.2288 | Leisure Suit Larry? | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 07 1996 14:06 | 279 |
| maybe Leisure Suit Larry Cleveland
long after the <FF>
Leisure Suit Larry VI
Shape Up or Slip Out
_________________________________________________________________
* What's the basic idea behind this game? How do I play? Help all
the babes in the game. Find a babe. Talk to her. Find out what she
needs, get it for her, and get ready for some gratitude. Not!
Don't get frustrated. Helping one babe may allow you to eventually
find the right babe for you.
* How do I get started? If you're in the front lobby at the
beginning of the game, try talking to the front desk clerk to get
your room key. Go up the stairs to your room, unlock your door and
go inside. Look at the table. Try calling all the phone numbers on
the cards on the table. Go to the bathroom. Use the sink. Look at
the brown water. Call maintenance to send a plumber up to fix it.
* How do I use the elevator or the ice machine next to my room? Some
things are not useful at the beginning of the game such as the
elevator and ice machine. We're going to try hard to make you
forget about certain things that you see early on, so keep your
eyes peeled and remember to look at things later that you couldn't
use at the start!
* What does Gammie want? Gammie wants to use the Cellulite Machine.
You'll have to fix it.
* How do I repair the Cellulite machine's piston? Go to the dining
room. Walk into the kitchen. Put your hand in the garbage to find
a can of lard. Take the lard and use it to lubricate the large
piston on the left.
* How do I repair the Cellulite machine's ripped vacuum hose? Go to
the Mud Bath and walk one screen to the right to reach the Weight
Room. There is a wide rubber belt on the BunShaker machine. If the
BunShaker machine is being used, talk to the body-builder,
Thunderbird. Leave the room and return. The BunShaker should be
vacant and you can take the belt. Use the belt on the hole in the
vacuum hose of the Cellulite Machine.
* How do I clean the Cellulite machine's filter? Use a wrench on the
filter tank bolt. Open the filter lid. Take the clogged filter and
use it on the sink in the Kitchen to clean it. Put the filter back
in the filter tank. Close the lid and tighten the bolt with the
wrench.
* Where can I find a wrench? You can get a wrench from the plumber.
Go to your bathroom and run the water in the sink. If you see
brown water, call maintenance at extension 76 to report your
plumbing problems. If the water is clear, stuff a roll of toilet
paper down the toilet. You can get some toilet paper from the
front of the maid's cart that appears every now and then outside
your room. When the plumber arrives, click the pick-up icon next
to the plumber to get the wrench. Use the pick-up icon, not the
hand icon. Take his file too, you might need it.
* I think the machine works, but I can't seem to tell Gammie. Why?
Give the machine a test run. Turn it on. Wait for the message that
everything is okay. Once you see the message, shut the machine
down and go talk to Gammie.
* Where can I get an orange? Go to the Dining Room. Click your hand
on the salad bar to find an orange. Take the orange.
* I need something to cool Gammie's forehead. What can I do? Get a
washcloth from the front of the maid's cart that appears every now
and then outside your room. Click the washcloth on the pool. Go to
the Kitchen. Open the refrigerator door. Put the wet cloth inside
and close the fridge door. Leave the Kitchen. Return to the
Kitchen and open the fridge. Use the take icon to pick up the cool
cloth.
* Where can I get some mineral water? If Gammie asks for some
mineral water, go to the hallway door east of the Blues Bar to
find a room service tray. Take the mineral water off the tray.
* After I helped Gammie, she took off! Why did I go through all
this? Gammie left behind a lot of excess cellulite. This can be
useful. Go to the beach and click your hand on the sand to find a
whale oil lamp. Click the lamp on the drainage faucet in the
center of the Cellulite Drainage room. Get a match in the Blues
Bar and click your zipper on it to light it. Light the lamp, and
you'll find you've created a Lamp of Knowledge. Pretty neat, huh?
* Where is Rose? Walk one screen left of the Front Desk. Open the
hallway door to enter the Health Spa. Rose is in the High Colonic
Treatment room through the door on the left.
* What does Rose want? Look around the High Colonic Treatment room.
You'll see lots of flowers. Rose loves flowers. You need to get
some more flowers for Rose. The only flowers you can take are in
your room. If you don't have your room key, talk to the Front Desk
girl to get it. Get the flowers from the vase in your room and
give them to Rose. She'll give you an orchid for all your
troubles.
* Where is Burgundy? Burgundy sometimes sings at the bar. If you go
to the bar and Burgundy isn't on stage, try walking out of the bar
for a little while and come back later.
* How can I talk to Burgundy? You need to unplug her microphone so
she'll stop singing and listen to you. Put your hand on the
microphone wire to unplug it.
* Where can I find some beer? The Spa will not serve alcohol, but
you can find a place that has beer. Go to the Mud Baths and walk
right. Walk through the Weight Room to enter the Aerobics Room.
Use the empty spot to dance and end the class. Talk to the
aerobics instructor and get her employee badge. Go back to the
hall and walk east until you reach the gate to the employee's
campground. Use the employee badge to open the gate. Enter the
tent and take some beer for Burgundy.
* The beer didn't help. Burgundy is singing again. What now? She
wants more beer! Go back to the employee's campground and get more
for her. After she drinks the second six-pack, she'll meet you in
the sauna.
* Where can I get a towel to wear in the sauna? You can get a towel
in two different places. You can take a towel from the maid's cart
that appears every now and then outside your room. You can also
get one from Gary the Towel Attendant in the Health Spa. To get
the towel from Gary, click your hand on the desk to sign in.
* How do I put the towel on? Go to the men's locker room. Open the
last locker on the lower right. Click the towel on yourself to
wear it. To change back into your leisure suit, open the locker
and click the towel on yourself again.
* Burgundy and Cav left without me. What do I do? Burgundy left her
silver bracelet in the sauna. Take it.
* Where can I find Shablee? Shablee is in the Make-Up Classroom. The
classroom is two screens left from the Front Desk. Go down the
ramp. Shablee is the girl in the lower right of the screen.
* What does Shablee want? Shablee wants an evening gown.
* Where can I find an evening gown? Burgundy, the Country Western
Blues singer has a gown. If you've gone to the sauna with her, you
can find the dress back-stage at the bar. Click your hand on the
curtain to walk on stage. Walk south of the stage between the
curtains to find the dress. Take the dress and give it to Shablee.
* Shablee says she'll meet me later on the beach, but later never
happens! You need to get a condom. Get your room key from the
girl at the front desk and go upstairs to your room. Look at the
cards on the table. Call the Turn Down service at 75 to order a
surprise. Leave your room and go downstairs. When you return to
your room, a condom will be left on your bed. Take the condom, and
you'll meet Shablee on the beach.
* I've met Shablee on the beach. What do I do now? Put your hand on
her and talk to her several times. When the moment is right, click
the condom on her. When you've returned to your room, go back to
the beach and get the champagne.
* What does Charlotte want? Charlotte wants some batteries.
* How do I get batteries? Go to the Blues Bar and get a match from
the bowl at the left end of the bar. Go to the hallway. Talk to
Art the Tram Driver to ride the tram east until it stops outside
the employee's campground. Give the match to Art so he'll go smoke
a cigar. After Art leaves, click your hand on the tram to open the
rear hood. Use the wrench on the tram motor to disconnect some
cables. After you close the hood, Art returns and will open the
hood. Talk to Art to get his flashlight. Before Art asks you to
return his flashlight, click your hand on the flashlight to remove
the batteries.
* Where can I get a wrench? You can get a wrench from the plumber.
Go to your bathroom and run the water in the sink. If you see
brown water, call maintenance at extension 76 to report your
plumbing problems. If the water is clear, stuff a roll of toilet
paper down the toilet. You can get some toilet paper from the
front of the maid's cart that appears every now and then outside
your room. When the plumber arrives, click the pick-up icon next
to the plumber to get the wrench. Use the pick-up icon, not the
hand icon. Take his file too, you might need it.
* How do I open the Electro-Shock door? Go to the Make-Up Classroom
and take the unused electrical cord on the floor. Go to the Mud
Baths. Stand near the Electro-Shock door and click your hand on
the electrical cord to strip one end bare. Use the cord on the
electrical outlet to plug it in. Use the electrical cord on the
electronic lock to open the Electro-Shock door. After Charlotte
zaps you, return to the Electro-Shock room and get the pearl
earring that someone dropped.
* Where is Thunderbird? Thunderbird is working out in the Weight
Room. Go to the Mud Baths. Walk one more screen to the right.
* What does Thunderbird want? Thunderbird wants a pair of handcuffs.
* Where can I find a pair of handcuffs? Go to the Front Lobby. Walk
one screen south to get an outside view of the Spa. Look at the
gatehouse to get a close-up of Darryl the Gate Guard. He has a
spare set of handcuffs on his belt.
* How can I get the handcuffs? You need to distract Darryl the Gate
Guard. Go to the Mud Baths. Click your hand on the plants below
the video camera to move them out of the way. Use a wrench on the
video camera to aim it through the vent into the women's shower
room. Go back to the gatehouse. Use the pick-up icon to take the
handcuffs from Darryl's belt. Give the handcuffs to Thunderbird.
* Where can I find a wrench? You can get a wrench from the plumber.
Go to your bathroom and run the water in the sink. If you see
brown water, call maintenance at extension 76 to report your
plumbing problems. If the water is clear, stuff a roll of toilet
paper down the toilet. You can get some toilet paper from the
front of the maid's cart that appears every now and then outside
your room. When the plumber arrives, click the pick-up icon next
to the plumber to get the wrench. Use the pick-up icon, not the
hand icon. Take his file too, you might need it.
* Which room is Thunderbird's? Go to the Front Desk and walk three
screens to the left. Open the middle door to find Thunderbird's
room. Thunderbird will give you a dog collar. Click your hand icon
on it to get a diamond.
* Where can I find Cav? Cav is the Aerobics Instructor in the
Aerobics Classroom. Go to the Mud Baths. Walk to the right to
enter the Weight Room. Open the door on the right to enter the
Aerobics Classroom. You can also reach Aerobics Classroom from a
door on the right leading from the Pool area.
* How can I get a chance to talk to Cav? Click your hand on the
empty step to start dancing and disrupt the class. Cav the
Aerobics Instructor will dismiss the class. You can now talk to
her.
* How can Cav help me? Talk to her a few times, look at the employee
badge on her shirt. Take the badge. The badge will allow you to
get into the employee's campground.
* I need a date so I can meet Cav in the Sauna. Who do I ask? Ask
Burgundy.
* Where can I find a towel for the Sauna? You can get a towel in two
different places. You can take a towel from the maid's cart that
appears every now and then outside your room. You can also get one
from Gary the Towel Attendant in the Health Spa. To get the towel
from Gary, click your hand on the desk to sign in.
* How do I put the towel on? Go to the men's locker room. Open the
last locker on the lower right. Click the towel on yourself to
wear it. To change back into your leisure suit, open the locker
and click the towel on yourself again.
* Where is Merrily? Merrily is floating next to the floating bar in
the pool. You can't talk to her until you get close to her.
* What does Merrily want? Merrily wants unlimited access to the
bungee/dive tower.
* Where can I find a swimsuit for the pool? Take some dental floss
from the back of the maid's cart that appears every now and then
outside your room. Go to the pool and wait for the pool bar to
float near the edge of the pool. Look at the floating bar and take
the sunglasses' case from the bar. Open the sunglasses' case and
remove the sunglasses. Click your hand on it again to get the
cloth. Use the dental floss on the cloth to make a swimsuit.
* How do I put on my swimsuit? Go to the pool. Click the swimsuit on
yourself to wear it. You can't wear the swimsuit anywhere else. To
put your clothes back on, click the swimsuit on yourself again.
* Where do I get a flotation device? The flotation device is on the
far side of the pool near the middle of the screen. It is a brown,
deflated, beaver pool float.
* How do I inflate my flotation device? Go to the kitchen. Click the
beaver on the road coach's front tire to inflate it.
* How do I use the flotation device? Click your hand on the pool to
swim in it. Click the beaver on yourself to ride it. Float over to
the bar and talk to Merrily.
* How do I order a drink at the pool bar? Click your hand on the
beaver's tail to slap it on the water. This will alert the
underwater waitress that you want to order a drink.
* Where can I get ID to order a drink? Show your room key to the
waitress.
* How can I get Merrily a tower key? Get some soap from the maid's
cart that appears every now and then outside your room. Wear your
swimsuit at the pool. Talk to the life guard to get the tower key.
Use the tower key to climb the tower. Before you dive, click the
tower key on the soap to make an impression. Dive into the pool,
get out, put your clothes on and walk to the front desk. Take a
room key from the Quicki Checkout bin. Use the file on the new
room key to make a copy of the tower key. You can get the file
from the plumber if you have bathroom plumbing problems. Give the
duplicate tower key to Merrily.
* Finally, I'm on tower with Merrily. What do I do? Click your hand
and zipper icon several times on Merrily. Click your hand on
yourself to remove your clothes, then click the zipper on her.
You'll get Merrily's Words of Wisdom before you fall.
* Where is Shamara? You can find Shamara in the Penthouse on the
balcony.
* How can I get to the Penthouse? Go through the Dining Room to get
to the Kitchen. Click your hand on the controls next to the
dumbwaiter to open and enter the dumbwaiter. Click your hand on
the lower red push-button outside the dumbwaiter to reach the
Penthouse. Walk to the balcony and talk to Shamara.
* What does Shamara want? Shamara wants an orchid, a diamond, a
pearl, a silver bracelet, a modern sculpture made from your melted
gold medallion, some Words of Wisdom, a Burning Lamp of Knowledge,
and some chilled champagne.
* Where can I find all the stuff Shamara wants? You can get an
orchid from Rose, a diamond from Thunderbird, a pearl from
Charlotte, a silver bracelet from Burgundy, Words of Wisdom from
Merrily, and some champagne from Shablee. The champagne can be
chilled with ice from the ice machine next to your room. The
burning Lamp of Knowledge can be found on the beach. To make the
burning Lamp of Knowledge, fill it with cellulite after you help
Gammie and light it with a match from the bar. Light the match by
clicking your zipper on it. The modern sculpture created by your
melted gold medallion can be found after your encounter with
Charlotte in the Electro-Shock room.
|
63.2289 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Jun 07 1996 14:06 | 1 |
| It was June Cleaver who said the Ward was too hard on the Beaver.
|
63.2290 | From ESPNET | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 07 1996 14:39 | 33 |
| By Keith Olbermann
Special to ESPNET SportsZone
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quarantine for Ohio baseball?
Ask not at whom Albert Belle boils... he boils at thee...
This man has become, in the span of eight big league seasons and two
different first names, the baseball superstar most frequently in hot water
since Ty Cobb -- and unfortunately for Albert, the America of 1996 will not
tolerate another Cobb.
You name it, Belle gets angry about it. And writes his own rules about it.
And then, typical to the genre, believes he's being persecuted.
Albert, it's very simple. You can't throw baseballs at fans or
photographers and you can't dress down women reporters with obscenities at
the World Series and you can't put a forearm shiver on the chin of a second
baseman you outweigh by 40 pounds (knock him into the left field corner
with a clean block, but don't stop and try a move that would get you 15
yards in the NFL). You can't, you can't, you can't.
And the irony, of course, is that many good folks in Cleveland can't or
won't see the simple truth here. The Indians have been down so long and
here is one man who as much as any other has brought them up. Trust me on
this: it's better to have a last place team in your town for 40 years than
another Cobb.
It's also possible for anybody -- even Albert -- to spend all his hometown
goodwill. Consider the cross-state saga of Marge Schott. The initial
defensive comments from Reds fans seem to have vanished and there is almost
no one trying to prevent baseball from sweeping her under the rug.
|
63.2291 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 07 1996 15:27 | 9 |
|
Maybe Boston stands for "Bus" "town".
Busing was a overwhelming success in Boston because the people are
open-minded and tolerant, and they realized that the color of a
person's skin doesn't matter. Or was it the other way around - that
they were racist, bigots?
Please refresh my memory.
|
63.2292 | not completely black and white | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 07 1996 15:36 | 1 |
| And then there's the EISA, PCMCI and PCI bus wars...
|
63.2293 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Jun 07 1996 16:02 | 5 |
| You know sometimes you just let someone just spout off, because you figure
sooner or later they're going to run out of bile and venom.
Then again, there's always that one exception to what you would normally
expect......
|
63.2294 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 07 1996 16:13 | 3 |
|
Don't worry Frank, I'll be out next week (but I can still note a
little... :-))
|
63.2296 | just when you think you know someone... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 07 1996 16:59 | 4 |
| >is that we are all Democrats.
>we all hate the Republicans.
NO WAY !!!
|
63.2298 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | wannabe figure skater | Fri Jun 07 1996 18:38 | 18 |
|
>> Way. Boston always votes democratic.
Not really. We wouldn't have a Republican governor if the largest
city in commonwealth always voted Democrat. What's more take a good
look at the makeup of the city govenment. Boston's democrats are
largely Reagan democrats. It's a fairly conservative city with
pockets of liberalism here and there with larger ones in the
suburbs. Not that any of this has anything to do with sports.
BTW - free speech obviously is not a tenet of this professed
liberalism or there would not be the constant shouting
down of anyone with a dissenting opinion on a certain
"sport". Hypocrisy has no politcal stripe.
|
63.2300 | You guys kill me | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Sat Jun 08 1996 10:52 | 12 |
| <<< Note 63.2295 by CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>
> Regardless, the one thing that just about everyone in town seems to share
>in common, bigot or no, is that we are all Democrats. We may disagree on how
>we feel about race but to a person we all hate the Republicans. Unless they
>are the Rockerfeller blue blood type, then they are OK.
Ah yes, those fond memories of the Dukaka era and the steady
stream of refugees coming across the NH border to live in some sort
of sanity...
daryll
|
63.2301 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | wannabe figure skater | Mon Jun 10 1996 09:44 | 31 |
|
>> jumping in late and taking a sliver of the thread out of context.
>> Had you seen my earlier note you would have seen where I said blue
>> blood Republicans were the exception.
Methinks you doth protest too much. You said "Boston always
votes Democrat" and you're wrong. Republican Bill Weld was
swept into the governor's mansion on the strength of one of
the largest margins of vctory in state history and he took
the city of Boston by nearly a 3-1 margin. In citywide elections
the largest vote getter is usually Dapper O'Neil who makes
Pat Buchanan look like a commmie sympathiszing tree hugger.
The city is not the liberal bastion that you're painting it.
>> your side of the figure skating argument is "expressing opinion"
>> while any opposition is "goose stepping".
Someone made the slightest reference to figure skating and you
threaten them with the figure skating 'debate'. You wield that
thing like a cudgel and use it to threaten and harass anyone who
would dare say anything that goes against your opinion of the
'sport'. And if they don't toe the line you try and beat them
into submission with it. That's not free speech. At the very
worst it's fascism and at the very least it's censorship and
it doesn't square at all with your supposed leftist leanings.
And, on the other hand, you have absolutely no compunction
about keeping a running commentary on the inadequacies of
college basketball and the NCAA tournamanent. And that's
hypocritical.
|
63.2302 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Mon Jun 10 1996 11:41 | 24 |
|
Tommy,
Regardless of the affiliation that politians were voted into office
under, the state of Massachusetts (and especially Boston) are
definately democratic in concept.
Can you even imagine an ammendment in Massachusetts proposing special
rights or discrimination against people of non-heterosexual
preferences? Can you imagine a town of 10,000+ where less than 1% of
the women over the age of 25 work?
I can come up with countless examples of things such as the two above
that would never occur in Massachusetts but ARE occuring in Colorado.
However, if you examine the people in office in Colorado you will find
that there are quite a few republicans in office.
The affiliation has little to do with the actual actions and behaviors
of that individual. For evidence of this, ask someone from France
(where there are TRUE political parties) how many political parties
exist in the US of A. The answer will be 1.
Marc
|
63.2303 | a real ralph of a nadir | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jun 10 1996 11:46 | 15 |
| > The affiliation has little to do with the actual actions and behaviors
> of that individual. For evidence of this, ask someone from France
> (where there are TRUE political parties) how many political parties
> exist in the US of A. The answer will be 1.
Main, are we in a bind when we're asking some french guys about our
political system!~
And of course, the French quite often give 1 as a standard answer. For
instance, this is their standard answer when asked how many drinks or how
many times they've cheated on their wives.
But ya better be careful or they'll taunt you...
TTom
|
63.2304 | | LEXSS1::MURPHY | | Mon Jun 10 1996 18:14 | 25 |
| RE: <<< Note 63.2295 by CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>
> Depends on where you are in Boston. There are parts of Boston that are not
> only racist,
I grew up in Boston and take offense to this remark. Care to back this
up with some facts. There are select people in Boston who are racist,
not "parts of Boston".
> When we 1st moved to the area Patty was going to Suffolk under grad and got a
>job in the personal office. Funny thing she found was that the 1st question
>other workers, who were mostly townies, would ask is where she lived. She came
>to find out that they were trying to get a quick fix on her ethnic background.
Funny, most "townies" I know that ask this question are just trying to
find out what part of the city you live in. Can you tell me what the
ethnic background is of someone that lives in West Roxbury, Dorchester,
Hyde Park, etc.
> On the other hand, in some villages like Brighton where we live it's the
>opposite. The area is full of B.C. and B.U. students and middle class people of
Meaning: Carpetbaggers
Dan
|
63.2305 | EX tribe member comes back! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Jun 17 1996 15:12 | 18 |
|
Just a few notes......
Greg Swindell is once again an Indian. He pitched 3+ innings,
gave up 3 hits and K'ed 3. No earn runs!
Quite the weekend in New York for the Tribe...a split. Albert
gets bats thrown at him from those great NY fans.
Report is that Albert's suspension will be reduced.
Report that Roger Clemens will be trying out for the Indians
this week while in town.
The Chief,
WAHOO!
|
63.2306 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jun 17 1996 15:18 | 3 |
| > Report is that Albert's suspension will be reduced.
Did this come from the Plain Dealer?
|
63.2307 | YOU PAY THE MOST TO THE UNION AND YOU GET BETTER REPRESENTED | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Jun 17 1996 15:27 | 32 |
|
No,
It was out of the Sunday or Saturday paper. Suspension
will go to 3 days at best. Maybe even less or none at all. The
Players Union put up a huge fight and even called the commiss
to the stand for 1.5 hrs.
W A H O O ! ! !
BTW - Who has the best record in the Major Leagues???
T H E
C L E V E L A N D
I N D I A N S
|
63.2308 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jun 17 1996 15:53 | 5 |
|
Albert's going to be suspended for the 3 games against the Red Sox,
so the Tribe fans have an excuse for getting swept. :^)
Ron
|
63.2309 | Baseballs, garbage, whatever they could get their hands on | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Jun 17 1996 16:33 | 10 |
|
> Quite the weekend in New York for the Tribe...a split. Albert
> gets bats thrown at him from those great NY fans.
That was yet another completely disgraceful episode from the
partisans of Yankee Stadium...
glenn
|
63.2310 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Mon Jun 17 1996 16:51 | 4 |
|
But make no mistake about it, those Yankee fans are just
like fans every where. Or so I've been told by one or two
SPORTS noting Yankee fans.
|
63.2311 | Though it never worked for me, | THEMAX::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Mon Jun 17 1996 20:55 | 4 |
| Hey a few beers and a woody in hand and usually people forget about
what is "really" going on (-)
Tim
|
63.2312 | you tell me... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 18 1996 14:10 | 6 |
| > But make no mistake about it, those Yankee fans are just
> like fans every where. Or so I've been told by one or two
> SPORTS noting Yankee fans.
Was Barry Bonds in Yankee Stadium last week when he was doused with
a full beer while making a catch in LF ???
|
63.2313 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Jun 18 1996 14:43 | 2 |
| I will grant that a Yankee fans would never waste a *full* beer by dumping
it on a player - only a partial beer!
|
63.2314 | Yankee Stadium - Land O' Losers | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Tue Jun 18 1996 14:46 | 10 |
|
I'd hardly equate a beer shower with pelting someone with
batteries, bats and baseballs and other items thrown with
the expressed intent of doing physical damage but then I'm
not a Yankees 'fan' so such distinctions don't escape me. Joe,
at least three or four times a year you have to come in here
and make lame excuses for the neanderthal behavior of the losers
who populate the stands at Yankee Stadium. I'd think you'd have
grown tired of it by now and would just fess up that they're
scumbags.
|
63.2315 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Jun 18 1996 14:52 | 6 |
|
No lesser Scum_bags than those who inhabit Fenway.
Chap
|
63.2317 | Oh yeah, someone once spilt beer on po' Chappy... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 18 1996 15:10 | 16 |
|
> No lesser Scum_bags than those who inhabit Fenway.
Let's review:
Yankee Stadium-- batteries, baseballs, and bats...
Fenway Park-- no batteries, no baseballs, no bats...
Yep, seems pretty clear to me.
glenn
|
63.2318 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Tue Jun 18 1996 15:40 | 11 |
|
>> Notes just wouldn't be the same if this 'discussion' didn't crop up
>> every summer...
I apologize, Karen if it seems that I'm doing anything but
mentioning how my delicate sensibilities are affronted year
in and year out by the boorish behavior exhibited by our
less cultured cousins to the south. Perhaps we might educate
them via a film entitled "Proper Fan Behavior - The Fen Way"
or some such because clearly they are in need of guidance.
|
63.2319 | everyone has their problems... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 18 1996 15:54 | 6 |
| > mentioning how my delicate sensibilities are affronted year
> in and year out by the boorish behavior exhibited by our
> less cultured cousins to the south. Perhaps we might educate
> them via a film entitled "Proper Fan Behavior - The Fen Way"
proof that pompous arrogance hath no bounds...
|
63.2320 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Jun 18 1996 16:03 | 9 |
| I think we have to wait for Albert's appearance at Fenway for the
comparison. Shaughnessy etal have made a determined effort to roust
out Fenway's worst for an all-out assault on Belle although unlike the
Post's Mathews, the suggestion to toss [baseball] at Belle wasn't
explicitly made.
Tommy make sure of the size of that crow. Not that the base argument
re. the boorishness of the two venues is in question. The Stadium is
the pits.
|
63.2321 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 18 1996 16:20 | 15 |
|
For all those who laughed about my comments regarding a possible deal
between the Red Sox and Indians for Clemens:
1. Boston Globe speculates that the Sox at best could get one top
prospect (like in the Cone deal). I advocated trading two.
2. One of the players I mentioned was Paul Shuey. In Shuey's last
5 outings prior to being recalled his numbers were:
9 ip, 0 H (YES 0 HITS), 2 BB, 0 R, 15-18 Ks (I don't remember the
exact number)
Since being recalled, he has pitched very well. He has a clue
and he is the real deal.
|
63.2322 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 18 1996 16:27 | 11 |
|
BTW, speaking of the Globe...
Nick Cafardo became still the latest reporter to incorrectly state
that Belle broke Vina's nose. Whatever your feelings about the
incident, it was quickly established that Vina did not suffer a
broken nose (interviews after the game showing Vina with nary a
bruise or swelling on his face probably should have been the first
clue).
Joe
|
63.2323 | | THEMAX::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Tue Jun 18 1996 18:23 | 5 |
| Was that Hal complaining about fans throwing things at players?
Does batteries and dog bones help with da memory?
Tim
|
63.2324 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 18 1996 21:45 | 7 |
|
Swindell reportedly had his choice to go to Cleveland or Boston.
Like what a no-brainer decision. He could go to Boston with its
poor drivers, racist attitude, and bad chowder or to Cleveland.
I wonder how long it took him to decide to take less money in Cleveland
(hint - less than 15 seconds).
|
63.2325 | give it up | NQOS01::nqsrv239.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Wed Jun 19 1996 00:34 | 3 |
| Groaner, does it piss you off that no one ever takes your bad chowder bait?
|
63.2326 | bookbinders in Philly has real chowder | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jun 19 1996 00:47 | 3 |
|
Kind of fitting to mention chowder and bait in the same sentance since
that's what the chowder tastes like - worms and dirt.
|
63.2328 | That Blow was low enough for Westy to catch there KBD!!!!!!! | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Jun 19 1996 08:45 | 0 |
63.2329 | Go Yanks..... | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Wed Jun 19 1996 08:57 | 7 |
|
OK, Mike I'll bite, Whats KBD???
Karen, keeping it close, can't wait for you to buy by a wonderful
lunch.......
/Westy
|
63.2330 | Reminds me of a game last year... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Jun 19 1996 09:04 | 14 |
|
Swindell gets his first win as the Indians come from 6-0 to win
the game in Cleveland style 7-9.
Grand Slam by Omar!!!
Go Tribe!!!
Chicago now 3 back.....again!
W A H O O ! ! !
|
63.2331 | Yank!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Jun 19 1996 10:07 | 12 |
|
Yeah sox fans don't throw batteries or coins. Ask Mickey Rivers
about the darts and cherry bombs exploding near him after he but Bill
Lee on the DL. Ask Jim Eisenreich about people out there laughing and
throwing soda when he was having a convulsion.
Face it Red Sox fans are losers just Yuppie losers.
Chap
|
63.2332 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 19 1996 11:27 | 7 |
| Does anyone know the "particulars" on the Tavares and Bad Albert
suspensions ? One report I heard made it sound like Hargrove had
his choice of when they would miss their games. He said he wanted
Tavares for the Yankees' series 'cause of the Friday doubleheader.
Did the AL say that they would serve their suspensions separately
and Cle had the choice of when on each ?
|
63.2333 | from Sportszone | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Jun 19 1996 11:31 | 117 |
| AltaVista Search
_________________________________________________________________
ESPNET SportsZone | Major League Baseball
SUSPENSIONS REDUCED FOR BELLE, TAVAREZ
_________________________________________________________________
[IMAGE] Vi�a tired of whole incident
[IMAGE] Sandy Alomar says the loss of Albert Belle will be felt.
(95k wav) | Real Audio
[IMAGE] Because he expected it, Indians reliever Julian Tavarez says
his suspension won't be as tough to sit through. (97k wav) | Real
Audio
NEW YORK -- Cleveland Indians outfielder [IMAGE] Albert Belle and
reliever [IMAGE] Julian Tavarez on Tuesday had their five-game
suspensions reduced to three games stemming from incidents in a May 31
game against the Milwaukee Brewers.
Albert Belle Belle
_________________________________________________________________
Belle and Tavarez each appealed their suspensions and met last week
with American League President Gene Budig while in New York to play
the Yankees.
Tavarez's suspension will begin Tuesday night against Boston while
Belle's will begin Friday against New York.
Budig suspended Belle because he believed the slugger threatened
injury with an apparent forearm to the face when he knocked over
Milwaukee second baseman Fernando Vi�a while attempting to break up a
double play.
"What Albert Belle did crossed the line and it was wrong whether it
violated a written rule or not," said Budig. "He not only threatened
injury to another player, but also led to the later disruption of the
game."
Julian Tavarez Tavarez
_________________________________________________________________
Belle was not ejected from the game after the incident and union
associate general counsel Gene Orza claimed that a frame-by-frame
review of videotape of the play shows Belle did not strike Vina in the
face with his forearm.
Despite the reduction, both Orza and Belle's agent were not happy.
"This decision raises serious questions about the authenticity and
legitimacy of the review process. If the decision in this case were to
be based on the record -- as it should have been -- a conclusion that
the collision was outside the bounds of acceptable conduct would be
almost profane," Orza said in a statement that referred only to Belle.
"It remains, however, a regrettable decision and we intend to raise
its more unseemly aspects with the impartial arbitrator."
"There is no question that this is an act of retaliation by the
American League against Belle," said agent Arn Tellem. "It is a
disservice not only to Belle, but to the Cleveland Indians and their
fans."
As for V�a, he's tired of the entire incident.
"Everywhere I go, it's brought up," Vi� said. "I hold no grudges and I
know inside it was a cheap shot. But it's history now."
Belle was hit by a pitch from Brewers reliever Marshall Boze in the
eighth inning and Eddie Murray hit a grounder to Vi�a, who attempted
to tag Belle. Belle caught Vi�a off-guard with a hard hit, knocking
him to the ground. The two exchanged words as Belle jogged off the
field and the collision left Vi�a with a bruised nose.
Tavarez threw a ball behind Milwaukee's Mike Matheny in the ninth
inning. Matheny charged the mound and the benches emptied. During the
fracas, Tavarez became entangled with umpire Joe Brinkman and slammed
the umpire to the ground.
Budig said Tavarez was suspended "for placing the safety of an umpire
at risk -- which is inexcusable." Brinkman was trying to restore order
when he was slammed to the ground.
"I have been convinced that Julian Tavarez did not realize Joe
Brinkman was an umpire at the time of their initial contact, but that
does not excuse his other actions," Budig said.
Matheny also was suspended for five games. He is appealing, and his
hearing has not yet been held.
Belle's hearing Friday lasted slightly more than an hour. On Thursday,
he met with league officials for more than four hours and was
represented both days by Orza and other members of the Players
Association.
"After painstaking review, the league has determined, however, that
three-game suspensions are more equitable," Budig said.
It is the fourth major incident this year involving Belle.
Last month, he cursed out a fan at The Ballpark in Arlington, Texas,
after he refused to give him an autograph. Belle was ordered to
undergo counseling by Budig two weeks earlier after he was accused of
throwing a ball that hit a Sports Illustrated photographer.
Earlier this season, Belle was fined $50,000 by the league for his
profanity-laced tirade at NBC reporter Hannah Storm before a World
Series game last fall.
Belle leads the majors with 25 home runs and is batting .322 with 66
RBIs in as many games. Belle hit 50 homers last season, becoming only
the fourth major-leaguer since 1961 to hit more than 50 homers in a
season.
|
63.2334 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Jun 19 1996 11:57 | 14 |
|
It is standard practice that if 2 players get suspended, the
suspensions don't occur simultaneously. The suspensions aren't geered
toward putting a team at a disadvantage, but geered towards invidual
players.
Since Cleveland has a double header on Friday, Tavarez will miss
the Sox series. So Cleveland has enough pitchers for the double header.
While Albert will miss the double header on Friday and Saturdays game,
then play on Sunday. Its a THREE GAME suspension not a three day
suspension.
I'm not sure if Cleveland got to choose who would be suspended
first.
Ron
|
63.2335 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 19 1996 12:45 | 5 |
| I agree about with Joe Huber. This "broken nose/jaw" story should have
long since been corrected and it's inexcusable for Cafardo to
reintroduce it - Cafardo should be suspended.
Note in baseball suspensions do not cause loss of pay.
|
63.2336 | sox suck, nuff said | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jun 19 1996 12:49 | 7 |
|
Nice choke by the Sox last night. Big Mo and John ValleyWimp came
through big in the clutch why unhearlded Omar proved once again to
be the better SS with the grand slam and 6 RBI.
Anyone get a look at Fernando Vina's 1995 baseball card where he's
driving his forearm into a catchers face at a play at the plate?
|
63.2337 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 19 1996 13:12 | 8 |
| > Note in baseball suspensions do not cause loss of pay.
I thought I read that they do lose pay.
Thanks for clearing that up for me Ron. The ESPNET article didn't
answer the questions.
|
63.2338 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 19 1996 15:02 | 3 |
| No I read where the existing labor agreement prohibits forfeiture of
pay for that type of suspension. Missing games while on a boat in
Arizona, probably yes.
|
63.2339 | Muscle | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof | Thu Jun 20 1996 05:43 | 6 |
| Jose showed Belle who REALLY has the muscle last night, he was smashing
the ball. I've never seen nervous little Albert so well behaved, shows he can't
pick on anyone his own size. Jose is only three dingers back in a lot less at
bats. Maybe Belle can find his swing during his suspension.
Rich............
|
63.2340 | all us injun fans will be crushed | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 20 1996 08:26 | 6 |
|
Yeah, I wish Cleveland had Jose and the Sox team... because when the
team sucks, people focus on individual statistics. It'll be great
when the Sox don't make the playoffs and you're in here telling us how
Jose hit 8 less dingers than Belle in a lot less at bats (because he
was hurt all the time).
|
63.2341 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 08:38 | 5 |
|
Tribe sweeps hapless Red Sux again, what else is new. Maybe Roger
Dodger Rocket should start pointing fingers at himself and keep his
mouth shut. He's dumping on Sele yet he couldn't even hold a 3 run
lead - he's a choke master.
|
63.2342 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 09:25 | 5 |
|
re: .2308
Any more greate predictions Ron?
|
63.2343 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 21 1996 09:36 | 10 |
| Clemens was hardly dumping on Sele. It looked more like he was trying to
give him a pep talk about how his stuff was really good but he had to get more
aggressive and pitch with more confidence.
It's hard to tell exactly what they are saying considering the number of
filters this story is going through but the implication seems to be that they
want Sele to get tough by coming inside on hitters more often even if he risks
hitting a few and having guests visit the mound every now and then.
George
|
63.2344 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:05 | 5 |
| Any predictions on the 4-game set vs. NY, Groaner ? (note, I'm not
asking JoeH 'cause statistically the Yanks don't belong on the same
field with Cle) With the Yanks throwing 2 rookies in today's
separate-admission doubleheader, a split would be a major victory
for the Pinstripers.
|
63.2345 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:29 | 13 |
|
> (note, I'm not asking JoeH 'cause statistically the Yanks don't belong
> on the same field with Cle)
Ummm... when did I say (or even imply) that? The Yankees certainly
_do_ belong on the same field with Cleveland; they're better at getting
on base, and not giving up multi-base hits, worse at keeping runners
off base, and much worse at hitting for power. _Beyond_ the White Sox,
I'm most worried about the Yankees and Rangers...
Even though you didn't ask for it, my prediction - Tribe takes 3/4.
Joe
|
63.2346 | Tryin to help.... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:41 | 8 |
|
Better check with Bill James on that prediction Joe. By Statistical
analysis .500 is a much better prediction.
Chap
|
63.2347 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Jun 21 1996 13:08 | 5 |
| re .2342,
Albert played.
Ron
|
63.2348 | 9th inning win 5-4! Manny blasts one along with Thome | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Jun 21 1996 13:54 | 19 |
|
Albert's suspension is reduced to 2 games.....he will miss the
double header today. What time does the game start???
The Tribe is hot and it seems that Boston always puts them on
the HOT trail!
Word from Cleveland is that Hart is presenting Clemens with an
offer this morning. Do not know the outcome yet though. Will
post it as soon as work comes in.
The Chief,
W A H O O ! ! !
GO TRIBE!
|
63.2349 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 14:28 | 4 |
|
Cleveland will do no better than 2-2, they should go 3-1. Swindell
will shut them down completely.
|
63.2350 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:00 | 3 |
|
1-0 Cle top 4.
|
63.2351 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:09 | 9 |
|
> Word from Cleveland is that Hart is presenting Clemens with an
> offer this morning. Do not know the outcome yet though. Will
> post it as soon as work comes in.
Ummm... hopefully he's presenting _Boston_ with an offer - otherwise
the tampering police we be on him in a flash...
Joe
|
63.2352 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:26 | 2 |
|
4-1 Cle bot 7.
|
63.2353 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:39 | 2 |
|
5-1, top of 8th. Excuses chappy?
|
63.2354 | :-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:39 | 4 |
|
EXCUSE THIS!!
|
63.2355 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:43 | 14 |
|
Too bad the Sox can't get a guy like this, but gee, if the fans of the
team think this guy is not a prospect, the management is probably the
same - has no clue in judging talent.
Paul Shuey -
Last 7 *MAJOR LEAGUE* appearances.
8 1/3 ip, 3 hits, 0 bb, 7 Ks, 1 save, 1 win.
Looks to me like the guy has gotten it together. This after this
several appearances in the minors before being recalled yielded
9 ip with 0 hits, 3 walks and about 15-18 Ks.
|
63.2356 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:45 | 10 |
|
AL AT CLEVELAND (1ST GAME) - MID INNING UPDATE
PLAY: Paul Assenmacher relieved Charles Nagy.
SITUATION: 0 RUNS IN, PAUL ONEILL ON FIRST, WADE BOGGS ON
SECOND, 1 OUT
CURRENT SCORE: NEW YORK 1
CLEVELAND 5 TOP, 8TH
DUE UP FOR NEW YORK: T MARTINEZ (.282, 0-FOR-3)
|
63.2357 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:56 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2355 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> Paul Shuey - Last 7 *MAJOR LEAGUE* appearances.
>
> 8 1/3 ip, 3 hits, 0 bb, 7 Ks, 1 save, 1 win.
Yeh, but is this clown going to get any Wins or Saves?
Big deal if all he does is help you with ERA and RATIO.
George
|
63.2358 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:13 | 7 |
|
George, he has 1 win and 1 save in 9 overall Indians games...
that projects out to 18 wins and 18 saves pace... When he
takes over Tavarez's role and starts picking up wins left and
right, then we'll talk again.
|
63.2359 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:24 | 7 |
|
Cle 5 NY 4 Bottom 8. Squirming yet Groaner????
Chap
|
63.2360 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:26 | 4 |
|
Is Shuey the guy who's suppose to take over for Mesa one day?
George
|
63.2361 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:31 | 2 |
|
Shuey or Embree or Graves...
|
63.2362 | e | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:32 | 4 |
|
Tied up 6-6 after 8.5 innings
|
63.2363 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:40 | 2 |
|
If the Yankmees lose now, its a choke.
|
63.2364 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:40 | 3 |
|
As Joe said, one of Shuey, Graves or Embree, but my feeling is it will
be in the order I listed in terms of who gets the shot first.
|
63.2365 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:41 | 4 |
|
When GWilliams got his hit to lead off the 9th, I sent this to Joe...
send huber gwilliams singles... i got a bad feeling... get SHuey up!
|
63.2366 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:42 | 4 |
| > Shuey or Embree or Graves...
With so much talent depth, anything but many championship rings over
the next decade is a total organizational failure.
|
63.2367 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:49 | 11 |
|
I knew you were gonna say that Groaner.
Your so predictable!!
chap
|
63.2368 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:52 | 15 |
|
I hate when this happens...
AL AT CLEVELAND (1ST GAME) - MID INNING UPDATE
PLAY: Jeter singled to center, Girardi and Duncan scored,
Boggs
to second.
SITUATION: 2 RUNS IN, DEREK JETER ON FIRST, WADE BOGGS ON
SECOND, 2 OUT
CURRENT SCORE: NEW YORK 8
CLEVELAND 6 TOP, 10TH
DUE UP FOR NEW YORK: ONEILL (.317, 1-FOR-3, RBI)
|
63.2369 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:58 | 5 |
|
What was that about excuses earlier Groan????
You wanna dine on some crow or what???
|
63.2370 | | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Fri Jun 21 1996 16:59 | 4 |
|
Its now 8-7 Burnitz just homered!!!
|
63.2371 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:00 | 5 |
|
Dooooooooooooooooooooooop
|
63.2372 | ...and they've never lost a playoff game to the Yanks ever | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:07 | 6 |
|
Yankmees win 8-7.
You heard it here first, the Indians will not lose a playoff series
with the Yankmees for the rest of the decade.
|
63.2373 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:08 | 2 |
|
Tavarez is starting game 2 for Cleveland v.s. Ramiro Mendoza.
|
63.2374 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:09 | 14 |
|
Another one going into "THE GROANER FILE!!!!"
:-)
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2353 CLEVELAND INDIANS 2353 of 2373
ROCK::GRONOWSKI 2 lines 21-JUN-1996 14:39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5-1, top of 8th. Excuses chappy?
|
63.2375 | have a good weekend! | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:10 | 8 |
|
Lofton grounded out to end the game, sorry Hal its always nice to win
that first one!!!!!!
See ya Monday......../westy
PS....whats this I hear about the 60 minute man???
|
63.2376 | THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:14 | 15 |
|
Ahm....its the 90 minute man Kevin! We make'em scream!!!
The Tribe will come back and win the last three! Belle will
be back tomorrow!
So, who took the loss and the blown save?
Any of these games on the tube this weekend?
WAHOOOOO!!!
|
63.2377 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:16 | 1 |
63.2378 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:26 | 15 |
| > The Tribe will come back and win the last three! Belle will
> be back tomorrow!
With the game Burnitz had, maybe you'd have been better off had Bad_Ass
missed the original 5 games.
> So, who took the loss and the blown save?
Mesa on both counts.
USAToday.com says Martinez is pitching the nightcap...and that's what
WFAN said yesterday.
|
63.2379 | First time I've ever rooted for a NY team... | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Sat Jun 22 1996 07:11 | 3 |
| Tribe gets slapped silly twice in one day at home to the Yanks.
Steve
|
63.2380 | 1918 seems like yesterday | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Sat Jun 22 1996 13:15 | 2 |
|
This coming from a dunce sox fan.
|
63.2381 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Sat Jun 22 1996 13:16 | 3 |
|
What kind of idiot roots for the leader in their teams division unless
they've already thrown in the towel?
|
63.2382 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Sun Jun 23 1996 10:16 | 3 |
|
Tribe is really stinking up the joint... I see the score 5-0, go out,
come back and find out they lose again.
|
63.2383 | problem is... tribe will dump the yanks in the playoffss | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Sun Jun 23 1996 19:48 | 5 |
|
Good thing I'm out half a day on monday and tuesday, otherwise I'd have
to listed to Chappy on how the Yanks dominated the Tribe at the Jake.
Bottom line, Yanks now are favored to win it all, anything less is a
choke... and since they have a higher payroll, it should be expected.
|
63.2384 | | CHEFS::7A1_GRN | Go GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic team | Mon Jun 24 1996 06:49 | 6 |
| .2383
Ha ha ha!
CHARLEY$bandwagon_Yankees_fan
|
63.2385 | HAL watch day 1 | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jun 24 1996 09:04 | 26 |
|
BAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Yanks own the Indians. OWN!!! You Understand OWN!!!
12-2 lifetime at the Mistake called the Jake!
Dennis Martinez hasn't beat the Yankees since Hinkley was aiming at
Reagan.
Hal had better MOW on some crow today!!!
Joe Are you in today Joe? Explain them losses away using one of
your formulas Joe.
Groaner, This is too easy
Bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.Your a riot. Half days my ass!
Joey.....Joey......Joey.....
Chap
|
63.2386 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jun 24 1996 09:17 | 24 |
|
> Joe Are you in today Joe?
Yes I am.
> Explain them losses away using one of your formulas Joe.
There isn't a formula to determine who wins or loses a particular
game. There _can't_ be - the sample size is too small. And moreso
than in any other sport, any team can beat any other team. Season
shutouts in baseball are, while not unheard of, relatively rare
events. There are innumerable ocassions when a good team (the
Yankees) has swept a better team (the Indians).
Obviously we don't need a formula anyway - with the exceptions of
Swindell, Poole, Embree, and Ogea, Cleveland's pitching stunk.
I will say this - the possibility that the White Sox threat was
an illusion is becoming apparent; in two short weeks, they've gone
from leading the league in hitting _and_ pitching (as measured by
runs scored and runs allowed) to having middle of the pack hitting,
and pulling back to the pack in pitching.
Joe
|
63.2387 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jun 24 1996 10:26 | 12 |
|
re .2349
Groaner, care to make any more predictions?
>> Cleveland will do no better than 2-2, they should go 3-1. Swindell
>> will shut them down completely.
Even the Red Sox don't BLOW 4 games in a row, when they have leads
like the Tribe HAD.
Ron :^)
|
63.2388 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 24 1996 12:33 | 3 |
|
Maybe you better go back and check your records... did Cleveland lead
all 4 games? No.
|
63.2389 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Mon Jun 24 1996 13:09 | 1 |
| So Swindell is now the version of the Indians Lefthanded stopper?
|
63.2390 | there must a statistical reason: 'yeah look at W-L since '94' | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 24 1996 14:27 | 34 |
| > What kind of idiot roots for the leader in their teams division unless
> they've already thrown in the towel?
Or there's something to what some writers have been saying:
"The Cleveland Indians, the new team America loves to HATE !"
BTW, the Yanks radio crew called Lofton a BIG BABY during Saturday's
game when Thome didn't tag on Lofton's lineout to the outfield. Lofton
walked back to the dugout at a snail's pace, cast a scowling look at
Thome and threw his helmet. They quickly pointed out that Lofton must
be thinking only of his personal stats and not the game, as it was the
bottom of the 9th, the lineout was the 2nd out, and the Indians were down 2.
IE: Thome's run wasn't the important one, so why risk getting thrown out
to end the game ???
I don't like Yanks radio announcer John Sterling, but he was right
yesterday in saying that while this was a great accomplishment, over
the long haul it's just 4 of 162 games. I do disagree with him when
he says it doesn't mean anything in the playoffs. Sandy Alomar eluded
to the importance of this past weekend when he said, "this is a team
we're likely to face in the playoffs".
It'll be interesting to see if Hart panics into making some *questionable*
acquisitions. (And Groaner, Clemens has had his own personal days of
hell against the Yanks, so he may not be the answer.)
Would Hargrove dare pitch Martinez against the Yanks in the playoffs ?
Cleveland is just 13-14 in their last 27 games. I don't think Bad_Ass
has homered since the Vina incident. Let's see where this team goes
from here. The true test of a champion is how they handle adversity.
|
63.2391 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 24 1996 14:36 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2390 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
>BTW, the Yanks radio crew called Lofton a BIG BABY during Saturday's
>game when Thome didn't tag on Lofton's lineout to the outfield. Lofton
>walked back to the dugout at a snail's pace, cast a scowling look at
>Thome and threw his helmet.
Sounds like a lot of speculation there on the part of the Yankee announcers.
Maybe Lofton was mad at himself because he felt he had a pitch that he should
have hit better.
Sounds like a typical press thing to do, make assumptions that some athlete
has a bad attitude then bad mouth him about your own speculation.
George
|
63.2392 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Jun 24 1996 14:38 | 2 |
63.2393 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 24 1996 14:46 | 12 |
| How do you know for sure that's who he was looking at?
Maybe he was giving the 3rd base coach a glare for not sending him. Maybe
something fell out of the left field stands and he was looking to see what
happened. Maybe he was just staring off into space without thinking of who he
was looking at.
Sounds so typical for the media to assume that an athlete is doing the most
outrageous thing possible, decide their theory is correct, then comment on it as
if it were a proven fact.
George
|
63.2394 | something familiar | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jun 24 1996 14:47 | 5 |
| > Sounds so typical for the media to assume that an athlete is doing the most
>outrageous thing possible, decide their theory is correct, then comment on it as
>if it were a proven fact.
Sounds like SPROTSters, too...
|
63.2395 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 24 1996 14:55 | 6 |
| > Sounds so typical for the media to assume that an athlete is doing the most
>outrageous thing possible,
Well George, these media guys could have been wrong, but they see 162 games
a year, and these guys have been covering baseball for over a decade, so
I'll trust their judgement.
|
63.2396 | a bigger fix is in | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jun 24 1996 14:57 | 6 |
| and it's worser than that.
In MLB, the media is the judges, too. They vote on how many points
things like home runs count for.
TTom
|
63.2397 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:05 | 17 |
| Re <<< Note 63.2395 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
>Well George, these media guys could have been wrong, but they see 162 games
>a year, and these guys have been covering baseball for over a decade, so
>I'll trust their judgement.
Remember this is a business. Guys covering sports for the media, the press
and even the team have their jobs because they know their fans and know how to
write copy that sells papers and improves ratings, not because they necessarily
understand the athletes or the sport.
Even if they do have the ability to make a good guess as to what some guy is
thinking, I wouldn't trust them as far as I could fling them to tell the truth
if it meant passing up an opportunity to pump up those fans who love to be
outraged at highly paid athlete's and their behavior.
George
|
63.2398 | George do you own Lofton in any league or something?????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:06 | 7 |
|
Yabbut (sorry Kev) George heard about it third hand from you Joe so
he must be right.
Chap
|
63.2399 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:09 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2398 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>
> Yabbut (sorry Kev) George heard about it third hand from you Joe so
> he must be right.
I'm not the one making claims as to what Lofton was thinking.
I'm not saying Lofton is innocent of glaring at Thome, I'm saying he is
not necessarily guilty.
George
|
63.2400 | SNARF | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:14 | 1 |
63.2401 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:21 | 6 |
| The world not only has shades of gray, it's got colors and waves of light you
don't even see.
Black and white went out in the 50's.
George
|
63.2402 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:26 | 17 |
| Speaking of media and the least "gray" media person I know, where is
Will McDonough these days?
Shaughnessy must have read my earlier note because today he's saying
harass Albert to the max but don't throw anything at him or use racial
epithets. Is he clearing something up here?
Cafardo finally, has decided that the Sox will pack it in and dump
anyone they can to save cash and maybe scare up a prospect. "It's
unlikely Cordero will return to second base with the advent of Jeff
Frye". The preceding if it can be attributed to anyone in the RedSox
organization is so far beyond stupidity to make one weep.
Finally speaking of stupidity is the rebuttal of that accusation
towards Duquette that he subtely moved to crash the Redsox this year in
order to get rid of Kennedy and sundry other remnants and bring on his
phenoms?
|
63.2403 | we need more black and white, and less blinded-by-the-light ! | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:42 | 4 |
| > The world not only has shades of gray, it's got colors and waves of light you
>don't even see.
What they sellin' in Cambridge these days ???
|
63.2404 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Jun 24 1996 16:08 | 1 |
63.2405 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 24 1996 16:22 | 22 |
| Re <<< Note 63.2403 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
> -< we need more black and white, and less blinded-by-the-light ! >-
Well so far you have neither.
What you have are:
- Yankee announcers who see Lofton a few times a year,
- who are paid to pander to Yankee fans who love to hate Cleveland,
- who like all sports media types are experts at pumping up envious type
fans with stories about the outrageous behavior of rich athletes,
- speculating about what Lofton is looking at then raking him over the
coals over their own speculation.
If there is anything close to black and white here it's that we have plenty
of evidence that these type of people lie about this sort of thing and very
little evidence as to what Lofton was actually thinking.
That's about as black and white as you are going to get unless Lofton comes
clean and 'fesses up as to what he was thinking.
George
|
63.2406 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 24 1996 16:26 | 7 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2404 by PHXSS1::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>
> what color is the sky in the People's Republic of Cambridge?
Just curious, what's any of this got to do with Cambridge?
George
|
63.2407 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jun 24 1996 17:08 | 3 |
|
There must be something in the water.
|
63.2408 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Jun 24 1996 17:21 | 1 |
63.2409 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jun 24 1996 17:44 | 5 |
|
Dense population would be that part of the public which believes that
Yankee announcers can read Kenny Lofton's mind.
George
|
63.2410 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jun 24 1996 22:08 | 3 |
|
Where were all these Yankmee buddies last year when they choked the
big one away against the wimpy Mariners?
|
63.2411 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Tue Jun 25 1996 07:51 | 6 |
| Better yet, where were all these Indian fans 3 years ago when
they couldn't fill a mens room forget a stadium.
The ultimate bandwagon jumpers.
daryll
|
63.2412 | Indians vs Red Sox for 2 | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Tue Jun 25 1996 09:11 | 5 |
|
Tonites match-ups are Hershiser 7-4 at Gordon 5-3, 7:05 start.
Hal have fun......thanks for the coffee and donut......./westy
|
63.2413 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 25 1996 09:14 | 16 |
|
>Better yet, where were all these Indian fans 3 years ago when
>they couldn't fill a mens room forget a stadium.
Baloney.
While the Indians had some unimpressive attendence figures, they
were never in as big an attendence rut as seen in other cities.
And the current attendence trend dates back to _before_ the Indians
started winning.
Sure, some of the Indians fans of today are bandwagon jumpers - that's
inevitable. But there are also millions of people who rooted for the
Tribe through 35 years of gloriously incompetent management.
Joe
|
63.2414 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Tue Jun 25 1996 09:36 | 7 |
| Right Joe. Millions who rooted, but preferred not to "root" with
their wallet and go to the park.
I'd be real interested in seeing attendence figures over the past
6-7 years and the team's record for those years as well....
daryll
|
63.2415 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 25 1996 10:24 | 26 |
|
>Right Joe. Millions who rooted, but preferred not to "root" with
>their wallet and go to the park.
Most seasons, the Indians had attendence well over 1 million/year,
in spite of having a regularly poor team. When the team was exciting
(not _winning_ - they really never came close from 1960-1993 - but
just exciting), they'd pull 1.5-2.0 million.
Am I a poor fan just because I don't attend many Indians games? I
lived in Ohio, as an adult, for a grand total of less than three
months. At that, I was an hour away from Cleveland Stadium. My
family went to a game or two a year.
OTOH, I listened to Indians games whenever I could. I listened to
most of Len Barker's perfect game (the rest I watched on TV -
including Rick Manning's catch to end it. After hearing Toby Harrah's
catch, I raced to the TV to catch the replay.). I fell asleep on many
occasions trying to catch all of the West Coast games.
>I'd be real interested in seeing attendence figures over the past
>6-7 years and the team's record for those years as well....
I'll try to see if I can dig them up...
Joe
|
63.2416 | Yep, maybe something did fall out of the stands... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 25 1996 11:32 | 10 |
|
> Maybe he was giving the 3rd base coach a glare for not sending him.
This would be just as bad as staring down Thome, given the game
situation. So the real "maybe" here is, "maybe" George will come
up with just about anything, even something illogical, to cover a
player's ass...
glenn
|
63.2417 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Jun 25 1996 11:39 | 5 |
| But Glenn his base point about not believing the media blindly, ever is
sound. This perhaps is a bad example but in general you can pretty
well count on the media to get it wrong and be biased. Kevin Mannix of
the Herald is pretty good about not letting his bias too much into his
reporting but that's one exception.
|
63.2418 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 25 1996 11:44 | 15 |
|
> Most seasons, the Indians had attendence well over 1 million/year,
> in spite of having a regularly poor team. When the team was exciting
> (not _winning_ - they really never came close from 1960-1993 - but
> just exciting), they'd pull 1.5-2.0 million.
This is basically another way of saying that attendance was pathetic,
for modern times. The same claims can be made on behalf of the
Pittsburghs, etc. And Cleveland is a bigger city/market...
Attendances _under_ 1 million have been rare since about 1980 (1985?)
or so...
glenn
|
63.2419 | We're not talking Howard Cosell here-- considercontext | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 25 1996 11:50 | 14 |
| > But Glenn his base point about not believing the media blindly,
> ever is sound. This perhaps is a bad example but in general you
> can pretty well count on the media to get it wrong and be biased.
"Ever"? I'll leave that to the more cynical among us. And I'll
trust a game broadcaster 100 times more than a sportswriter. While
there may be some small ulterior motives, there is no comparison
with the writer who needs to drum up controversy to sell papers.
John Sterling criticizing Kenny Lofton (in what sure sounded like a
pretty obvious tantrum) is not going to bring viewers flocking to
the TV sets...
glenn
|
63.2420 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Jun 25 1996 12:05 | 7 |
63.2421 | Let the fun begin! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Jun 25 1996 12:12 | 12 |
|
The Tribe is on the WAR PATH tonight!!!
I see them circleing.....
I'm still looking for tickets.....there's got to be someone
out there who doesn't want to see the sox tonight...let me know!
The Chief,
W A H O O ! ! !
|
63.2422 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Tue Jun 25 1996 12:55 | 6 |
| >> This is basically another way of saying that attendance was pathetic,
>> for modern times. The same claims can be made on behalf of the
>> Pittsburghs, etc.
The same claims were made on behalf of Pittsburg - by you.
|
63.2423 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 25 1996 12:59 | 12 |
| >> This is basically another way of saying that attendance was pathetic,
>> for modern times. The same claims can be made on behalf of the
>> Pittsburghs, etc.
>
> The same claims were made on behalf of Pittsburg - by you.
That's right. On behalf of Pittsburgh, the smallest market in
baseball. Not Cleveland, the cultural capital of Ohio. Not Atlanta,
the capital of the New South...
glenn
|
63.2424 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jun 25 1996 13:36 | 31 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2416 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Hardball, good ol' country" >>>
> This would be just as bad as staring down Thome, given the game
> situation. So the real "maybe" here is, "maybe" George will come
> up with just about anything, even something illogical, to cover a
> player's ass...
Sure what I said is illogical if you clip off the front and back and take
the middle line out of context.
Within the context what I was saying is that no one can read Lofton's mind.
I offered a list of alternatives not to suggest that one of them had to be
correct, only to illustrate that there were other possibilities.
But just to use your method of arguing here's what you can do taking
something out of context.
/Glenn mode on
RE <<< Note 63.2416 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Hardball, good ol' country" >>>
> ... staring down Thome, ...
> ... here is ...
> ... an ... ... illogical ...
> player's ass...
How do you know Thome's ass is illogical. Maybe it works just like everyone
else's ass. Glenn will say anything to win an argument.
/Glenn mode off
George
|
63.2425 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Tue Jun 25 1996 13:58 | 5 |
|
>> How do you know Thome's ass is illogical. Maybe it works just
>> like everyone else's ass. Glenn will say anything to win an argument.
You have a lot of growing up to do.
|
63.2426 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:00 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2425 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need to talk figure skating." >>>
> >> How do you know Thome's ass is illogical. Maybe it works just
> >> like everyone else's ass. Glenn will say anything to win an argument.
>
> You have a lot of growing up to do.
Thanks Tommy. I meant to include you when I talked about people who's only
prayer of winning an argument is to take something out of context. Thanks
for doing it in that note and saving me the trouble.
George
|
63.2427 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:15 | 7 |
|
> Not Cleveland, the cultural capital of Ohio.
Interesting statement. Not one I'm sure I'd buy, though -
Cincinnati and Columbus certainly might dispute the claim.
Joe
|
63.2428 | see what you mean | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:16 | 2 |
| Yeah, Cincinnati does have Marge Schott. And then there's that State Fair
thing in the capitol city...
|
63.2429 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:16 | 4 |
|
And what about Dayton?
George
|
63.2430 | Holy Toledo!~ | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:16 | 0 |
63.2431 | | NQOS01::nqsrv139.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:23 | 4 |
|
You'd have to give it to Cleveland, just on the merits of the Orchestra.
brews
|
63.2432 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:25 | 6 |
|
Didn't Eliot Ness finish out his career as Cleveland's Police Commissioner?
That should count for something.
George
|
63.2433 | ta-dum | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:27 | 1 |
| Yeah, Elliot was reuinited with his older brother Loch.
|
63.2434 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:44 | 11 |
|
>You'd have to give it to Cleveland, just on the merits of the Orchestra.
That's certainly one of the arguments for Cleveland.
The Ohio Historical Center and COSI, plus the James Thurber house
are all in Columbus.
Cincinnati has the best zoo and art musuem in the state.
Joe
|
63.2435 | decisions, decisions | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Jun 25 1996 14:52 | 3 |
63.2436 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:00 | 6 |
|
Well, for that matter Cleveland's got a pair of WS rings.
Cincy has Kings Island.
Columbus has the first Wendy's...
|
63.2437 | may not have this right, but... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:06 | 2 |
| Which Ohio city had the Ogelthorpe (?) exhibit ?...later to go to Maewski's
town of Cambridge...
|
63.2438 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:07 | 6 |
|
I thought the Columbus Zoo was the tops? Been there, and thought
it was first-rate...
glenn
|
63.2439 | which one | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:11 | 8 |
| You talking about them dirty photos or the thug in _Slap Shot_?
The photos were in Cincinnati, home of the KKK crosses.
The ice hokey guy played in Charleston, PA.
FWIW, there's a Cambridge, Ohio. I-70 and I-77 cross there. I've been
stuck there hitchhiking a time or 2.
|
63.2440 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:22 | 2 |
|
It was Mapplethorpe and it was in Cincinnatti.
|
63.2441 | Maybe this time ... | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:27 | 11 |
|
And I think they showed it in Boston, not Cambridge.
Never saw the pictures but they caused Dapper O'Neil popped one of the many
arteries that gives his neck such a deep red color. That alone made the exhibit
worth while.
Speaking of Red, the Indians travel to Fenway for a couple games. Orel
Hershiser goes for the tribe.
George
|
63.2442 | He played against em | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:37 | 3 |
| Olgethorp didn't play for Charlestown btw...
daryll
|
63.2443 | shore did | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:38 | 4 |
| yeah, like Phog Allen using the 4 corners against Wilt, I got this one
all screwed up.
It's still one of the great sports movies, though...
|
63.2444 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Tue Jun 25 1996 15:47 | 5 |
| I always liked the goalie when they announced his name,
"Ogletorp?!"
Great movie.
|
63.2445 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jun 25 1996 16:16 | 8 |
|
> I thought the Columbus Zoo was the tops? Been there, and thought
> it was first-rate...
I haven't been to Columbus' Zoo, but Cincy's is quite good; Cleveland's
isn't bad, but not in the same class.
Joe
|
63.2446 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jun 25 1996 17:11 | 8 |
| > I thought the Columbus Zoo was the tops? Been there, and thought
> it was first-rate...
> I haven't been to Columbus' Zoo, but Cincy's is quite good; Cleveland's
> isn't bad, but not in the same class.
Hey Groaner and JoeH, that's where you beat Boston, in ZOOS !
|
63.2447 | 1 ringie dingie, 2 ringie dingie, 3 ringie dingie | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Jun 26 1996 14:46 | 32 |
|
DING,
DING,
DING!!!
Can you spell....
H O M E R U N ! ! !
Great Game last night!!!! Great pitching...Oral has a wicked
curve!
Was funny though...Albert had more boooo's than Mo had Raw's!
One thing that must be said though, in Albert's 2nd at bat,
while in the batters box, Carlos hits a foul and the batboy
gets the ball. Albert motions to the batboy for the ball.
Albert takes the ball, walks over to the crowd and gives the
ball to this little kid sitting in the stands.
Now did this get mentioned on TV or ESPN or the Newspaper today???
NO! What a bunch of crap! or is this just some PR work being
done by the best?
The Indians OWN the Red Sox.....OWN I said! Do you need help is
its spelling.....how about this...15-0! Great article in the
telegram this morning.....
W A H O O ! ! !
|
63.2448 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Jun 26 1996 15:21 | 10 |
| > Oral has a wicked curve!
I knew a girl like that once.
But what about OrEl Hersch-whatever-his-name-is? Didn't HE pitch last night
8^)
|
63.2449 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 26 1996 15:23 | 4 |
|
Orel Hershiser
George
|
63.2450 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Jun 26 1996 15:53 | 6 |
|
The Sox have NEVER lost an entire season series. Is tonight
there last chance for this season? Or do they play another 3
series in Cleveland?
Ron
|
63.2451 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 26 1996 16:03 | 13 |
| They were saying on the news this morning that the Red Sox could break a
record tonight that they wouldn't want to break but I didn't catch what it was.
Maybe that's it.
Funny the way the schedules have been done this year, the Sox are going to be
just about done if not all done with the Indians and they are just beginning
with the Yankees.
Same thing happened with the White Sox, Brewers, and Twins. Two of those
three were done with each other (I think the White Sox and Brewers) before
one of those teams had seen the Twins.
George
|
63.2452 | Maris'/Ruth's Marks Appear Safe for Another Year | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 26 1996 16:23 | 10 |
| > ball to this little kid sitting in the stands.
> Now did this get mentioned on TV or ESPN or the Newspaper today???
> NO! What a bunch of crap! or is this just some PR work being
> done by the best?
He'll have to do a lot more than that to turn his image around.
BTW, when was his last HR ? Can we start a "Day_x" watch for this ??
|
63.2453 | | AWECIM::RUSSO | claimin! | Wed Jun 26 1996 16:44 | 4 |
|
The Red Sox play the Indians for the last time this season (that
includes post-season!!) tonight.
|
63.2454 | TICK TICK TICK | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Jun 26 1996 16:47 | 9 |
|
The Red Sox wouldn't give him the change last night in the ninth.
Intentional walk!...
Go Albert!
He'll get #26 tonight!
|
63.2455 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 26 1996 16:51 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2452 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
-< Maris'/Ruth's Marks Appear Safe for Another Year >-
Well last week he didn't hit a home run. He was 5 for 20 with a couple
doubles and a stolen base. Not exactly a slump.
Remember, last year he got really hot the last couple months of the season.
It would take a charge at the end but I wouldn't call those records safe yet.
George
|
63.2456 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:03 | 2 |
| I think McGuire hit #24 last night. If healthy he is a big, big threat
to Maris record and Ruth's too since he'll be doing it in less games.
|
63.2457 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:10 | 12 |
| Of course McGuire was the guy who's name became a household word about a
decade ago because he hit 30 home runs the 1st half of the season. Then he
tailed off in the 2nd half and the threat was ended.
He gets injured too much to break that record, a problem Griffey seems to be
facing now as well.
As for Griffey, maybe it's time Lou had a talk with him to point out that the
few extra catches he makes crashing into the wall don't make up for the time he
loses with his wrist in a cast.
George
|
63.2458 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:11 | 5 |
| > As for Griffey, maybe it's time Lou had a talk with him to point out that the
>few extra catches he makes crashing into the wall don't make up for the time he
>loses with his wrist in a cast.
You own him in a Rotisserie league, don't you, George?
|
63.2459 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:16 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2458 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "It's Baseball And You're An American" >>>
>You own him in a Rotisserie league, don't you, George?
Wish I did. Or Lofton, I'd take either one.
I do have Bonds on one team, and I've got Ruben Rivera waiting in the wings
on another.
George
|
63.2460 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:19 | 7 |
| George,
McGuire's already had his injury. That guy really seems to be able
to stack up the homeruns in a hurry and isn't walked around like
Thomas.
We must remember that Albert stacked 'em up pretty well last
September.
|
63.2461 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 26 1996 18:08 | 7 |
| Yeh, maybe McGuire could do it but somehow I don't think having had an injury
precludes it happening again. Nor does it preclude a slump.
Sure, maybe he can do it but if I had to bet on someone breaking the record
any year soon it would be Belle 1st and Griffey 2nd.
George
|
63.2462 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Thu Jun 27 1996 07:21 | 10 |
|
The record the Sox broke (I'm assuming they finshed with a L) was it
was the first time in Sox history the got SWEPT in a season series.
It don't get any worse than this. Roger pitches another solid game
Stanton comes in gets the broken bat ground ball but it finds a hole.
Whatever will go wrong will which is the total opposite of last year.
|
63.2463 | They actually pulled one out. | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Thu Jun 27 1996 08:01 | 3 |
| No, the record is safe. They came back and won it last night. Don't
know the details but they won it in extra innings. I think Naehring
hit a 2 run dinger to win it.
|
63.2464 | Hard to believe | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof | Thu Jun 27 1996 08:07 | 5 |
| Yeah, they scored 3 in the 9th to tie it, and then Naering hit a two run
dinger in the 15th to win it. Jose and Valentin also homered. A good win, it
showed a little character I really thought they were lacking.
Rich.......
|
63.2465 | History on the line, and a miracle: Mesa gacks it up | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 27 1996 09:56 | 10 |
|
I didn't stay up for the 15th, but the 9th was batting practice
served up by Jose Mesa.
I don't think the Indians are such a lock in the playoffs as their
fans think they are. Sure, they can bludgeon you to death, but I
don't like their late-inning makeup with this bullpen.
glenn
|
63.2466 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 27 1996 10:03 | 10 |
|
Actually, until this past weekend, the bullpen has been a clear
_strength_, not a weekness. If Mesa falters, there's plenty of
candidates to take his job.
I'm just bothered by the decision to go with only 11 healthy
non-pitchers. After Burnitz went in yesterday (was Lofton
injured?), the only guy on the bench was Pena...
Joe
|
63.2467 | In the postseason bullpen, I want talent, experience | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 27 1996 10:10 | 13 |
|
> Actually, until this past weekend, the bullpen has been a clear
> _strength_, not a weekness. If Mesa falters, there's plenty of
> candidates to take his job.
That's on paper, statistically (so far). But when the money's on the
line, I again would not trust Assenmacher, Plunk, Shuey et al if Mesa
falters (and I think Mesa's run may be winding down). I think the
Indians would want the proven stud out there. In the playoffs a
Paul Shuey could be the next Calvin Schiraldi...
glenn
|
63.2468 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 27 1996 10:14 | 7 |
|
In a related topic, homeplate umpire Larry Young was found guilty of
trying to read the temperamental Kenny Lofton's mind, but nonetheless
tossed his sorry butt out of the park one out into the contest...
glenn
|
63.2469 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu Jun 27 1996 10:25 | 9 |
| > In a related topic, homeplate umpire Larry Young was found guilty of
> trying to read the temperamental Kenny Lofton's mind, but nonetheless
> tossed his sorry butt out of the park one out into the contest...
Well, this is a relief.
Signed,
Kenny Lofton's Rotisserie owner
|
63.2470 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 27 1996 10:50 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2467 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN "Hardball, good ol' country" >>>
>In the playoffs a
> Paul Shuey could be the next Calvin Schiraldi...
That might not be bad. Calvin Schiraldi was an effective closer down the
stretch in a tight pennant race, helped the Sox through the A.L.C.S. and came
one lucky swing away from being a World Series hero. And that was back in the
day when being a closer meant you came in around the 7th inning and went the
distance.
As for the impossible to control Lofton who's mind can be read by every
member of the press looking for a story, except for Seattle I can't think of a
single team that wouldn't be improved right now by swapping their center
fielder for Lofton.
George
|
63.2471 | Nice memory George...Schiraldi sucked in entire postseason | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 27 1996 11:33 | 17 |
|
> That might not be bad. Calvin Schiraldi was an effective closer down the
> stretch in a tight pennant race, helped the Sox through the A.L.C.S. and came
> one lucky swing away from being a World Series hero.
No. Calvin Schiraldi was an effective closer down the stretch,
damned near singlehandedly drowned the Sox through the ALCS, and
came one lucky swing away from being bailed out of a save
opportunity he'd already blown in the 8th, way way back in the
days when being a closer meant you could come in and get at least
one out before self-destructing...
Which was the point about Shuey; I don't care how good he's looked
against the Sox, I wouldn't trust him in the playoffs.
glenn
|
63.2472 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 27 1996 11:54 | 13 |
|
> As for the impossible to control Lofton who's mind can be read by every
>member of the press looking for a story, except for Seattle I can't think of a
>single team that wouldn't be improved right now by swapping their center
>fielder for Lofton.
Actually, right at the moment Lofton certainly _would_ improve
Seattle... B^).
I'm not convinced the Yankees or Angels (when Edmonds is there) would
be _improved_ w/ Lofton.
Joe
|
63.2473 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Jun 27 1996 12:45 | 4 |
|
I wouldn't trade Bernie or Ruben Rivera's future (CF) for Lofton,
no way.
|
63.2474 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Jun 27 1996 13:16 | 6 |
63.2475 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 27 1996 14:24 | 13 |
|
> I wouldn't trade Bernie or Ruben Rivera's future (CF) for Lofton,
> no way.
I'd be careful w.r.t. Rivera; I can see him having a career similar
to another Ruben on the Yankees.
Whether or not I'd trade Bernie for Lofton would depend entirely
upon the situation of my team. w/ the Indians, I want Lofton. With
the Yankees, Bernie's a better pick. Therefore, at present a trade
makes _no_ sense for either side.
Joe
|
63.2476 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Thu Jun 27 1996 14:43 | 5 |
| Is Rivera the latest "next Mickey Mantle"?
Where is Kevin Maas these days?
daryll
|
63.2477 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 27 1996 14:50 | 16 |
| For center field I'd take Lofton over Bernie Williams. His defense is
outstanding, he steals bases, his average is about the same and his runs
created per game is less than half a point behind Williams.
From last season:
Name Rc Rcg gms avr Ab Ht Hr Tb Sb BB So
Bernie Williams 105.308 7.180 144 0.307 563 173. 18 274 8 75 98
Kenny Lofton 86.283 6.714 118 0.310 481 149. 7 218 54 40 49
Sure wouldn't mind having Lofton on the Red Sox instead of the rotating
wonders from Pawtucket we've seen thus far. It would be worth putting up
with all those negative telepathic images that he beams directly into the
minds of those in the press box.
George
|
63.2478 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 27 1996 14:57 | 9 |
|
So George,
Even on a team _loaded_ with guys who get on base, and with almost
_no_ power, you'd still take Lofton?
Thank you, no.
Joe
|
63.2479 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 27 1996 14:58 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2476 by SALEM::DODA "A little too smart for a big dumb town" >>>
>Is Rivera the latest "next Mickey Mantle"?
Yes, he's suppose to be the next Yankee star outfielder.
Up through last season he had great years working up to the AA level and
looked good in spring training this year. When the regular season started he
started out slowly at AAA Columbus. He got called up to the big league club
when Raines went on the DL and looked good at 1st then faded a bit. Last week
he got sent back to AAA.
Still Baseball America has him listed as #3 on their list of the top 100
prospects.
George
|
63.2480 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Jun 27 1996 15:01 | 13 |
|
Joe, you really don't know what your talking about do you? Comparing
Rivera to Sierra?
Not a clue.
Read the farm reports. Delve into Rivera's life. Find out about his
personality. Christ I bet even your guru Bill James has good things to
say about him.
Chapo
|
63.2481 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Jun 27 1996 15:05 | 10 |
|
I think Maas plays at Triple A somwhere. There is no next Mickey
Mantle! Where did you get that from? Mickey was one of a kind.
Go back to making fun of your LFer Darryl.
Chap
|
63.2482 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 27 1996 15:06 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2478 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> Even on a team _loaded_ with guys who get on base, and with almost
> _no_ power, you'd still take Lofton?
I think that Rivera will solve the no power problem. You could do worse than
an outfield of Gerald Williams, Kenny Lofton, Ruben Rivera with O'Neill at DH.
George
|
63.2483 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Jun 27 1996 15:07 | 4 |
|
Yeah look at Boston for the past 15 years.
|
63.2484 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 27 1996 15:51 | 19 |
|
> Joe, you really don't know what your talking about do you? Comparing
> Rivera to Sierra?
>
> Not a clue.
Why not? At the same age, Sierra was considered All-Tools, All-
Universe too. And I wouldn't be a bit surprised to learn that
Sierra's minor-league _performance_ was much better than Rivera's
at this stage in his career (nothing too too spectacular so far--
everyone is going on reputation and scouting reports at this point).
> Delve into Rivera's life.
Not a chance. Like Heiser, I have a life.
glenn
|
63.2485 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Thu Jun 27 1996 15:57 | 10 |
| WAKE UP Chappy. That "next Mantle" tag has been pinned on no less
than 3 NY rookies over the past few years with Buhner being the
other one that immediately comes to mind.
Meanwhile, just how many things were tossed/beers poured over
Joey in Fenway the past couple days?
Tell us again how fans are the same everywhere...
daryll
|
63.2486 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 27 1996 16:03 | 44 |
|
> Joe, you really don't know what your talking about do you?
Only time will tell...
> Comparing Rivera to Sierra?
Why not? Sierra came up at age 21 (or was it 20?), with lots of
power, decent speed, and draw a few walks (though not an overwhelming
number).
That's about where Rivera is (actually, Rivera's a bit older, but
is a better fielder).
> Not a clue.
We shall see...
> Read the farm reports.
Done that.
> Delve into Rivera's life. Find out about his personality.
Personality has _some_ impact upon success, but I'll take talent
nearly every time...
> Christ I bet even your guru Bill James has good things to
> say about him.
Um - Chappy - I wasn't trying to say anything bad about him.
Remember, Sierra came _very_ close to winning an MVP award; his
career, while not HoF caliber, has been quite good overall. I
think Rivera will have a good career, and could well win an MVP
award. I just don't think he'll be a HoFer, or come particularly
close to it.
And for the last time, Bill James is _not_ my guru. James, in
his early years, did some groundbreaking work - much of which has
since been surpassed by others. He had a significant effect on the
way baseball is watched. And he made the usual boatload of errors
in the process.
Joe
|
63.2487 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 27 1996 16:05 | 6 |
|
George, NY's power problem is _far_ too deep for one player to solve -
_particularly_ when you talk about giving up their best slugging player
in the process...
Joe
|
63.2488 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 27 1996 16:22 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2487 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> George, NY's power problem is _far_ too deep for one player to solve -
> _particularly_ when you talk about giving up their best slugging player
> in the process...
Fine, but I'm only talking about giving up one player in B. Williams whom
I would replace with Rivera.
Granted he's a prospect but I like prospects. Watching Ruben Rivera to see
how he handles the Mick's shoes sounds like a lot more fun than watching
Ruben Sierra.
George
|
63.2489 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Jun 27 1996 17:18 | 25 |
|
>> George, NY's power problem is _far_ too deep for one player to solve -
>> _particularly_ when you talk about giving up their best slugging player
>> in the process...
> Fine, but I'm only talking about giving up one player in B. Williams whom
>I would replace with Rivera.
I realize that. My point is that the Yankees would be better off
with Williams and Rivera than Williams and Lofton, given the rest
of their cast.
> Granted he's a prospect but I like prospects. Watching Ruben Rivera to see
>how he handles the Mick's shoes sounds like a lot more fun than watching
>Ruben Sierra.
But will it be more fun that it was watching Ruben Sierra ten years
back, when he was breaking in?
I've never shied away from prospects, and for good reason - there
exists the chance the Rivera will be phenominal; moreso than with
most prospects. But IMHO his career course will likely resemble that
of Sierra.
Joe
|
63.2490 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 27 1996 17:22 | 12 |
|
Mesa stunk up the joint to prevent the sweep. He said afterwards that
he felt sorry for the Sox, so he let them catch up.
In regards to Chappy's analysis of talent I only have to mention the
following trade he made a couple of years back:
Chappy gets Dan Gladden
Gronowski gets Juan Gonzalez
'nuff said
|
63.2491 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 28 1996 08:45 | 14 |
|
That was my first year in Rotis and Juan was just called up for the
first time.
How about this quote???
I'd rather have Jeter than Albert Belle. Remember who said
this? Or do you want me to post it?
Chap
|
63.2492 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 28 1996 09:09 | 10 |
|
> I'd rather have Jeter than Albert Belle. Remember who said
> this? Or do you want me to post it?
What's wrong with that quote? Short term, Belle's the better player.
Jeter likely will never become as good a _hitter_ as Belle is now.
But given his defensive contributions, he might become a better
_player_; he's also likely to have a longer peak than Belle.
Joe
|
63.2493 | All things considered | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Fri Jun 28 1996 09:40 | 7 |
| > I'd rather have Jeter than Albert Belle. Remember who said
> this? Or do you want me to post it?
Well, I didn't say it, but when I consider the pluses and minuses of both
players, I kind of wish I had.
Steve
|
63.2494 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 28 1996 10:38 | 4 |
|
Chappy, how about we talk about the Jeter v.s. Belle comment at the end
of the year when Albert is a free agent and the likelyhood of him
winding up in Colorado is about 87.5443290%.
|
63.2495 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 28 1996 10:39 | 4 |
|
Not only that... aren't you the guy who turned down the Rivera +
O'Neill for Belle deal last year?
|
63.2496 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Fri Jun 28 1996 11:22 | 3 |
|
We had Belle here in the Springs while playing as Joey for the SkySox,
you can keep him.
|
63.2497 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 28 1996 12:26 | 3 |
|
Belle would hit 70-80 HRs playing in that stadium. He'd probably have
45-50 at home!
|
63.2498 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Fri Jun 28 1996 12:47 | 4 |
|
I do not recall him being that great here at 6035 ft while playing
for the farm team. No PCL records for dingers etc; Every time he got
called up, they sent him back down for a attitude adjustment.
|
63.2499 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 28 1996 12:51 | 9 |
|
He's learned to hit the long ball since then with regularity.
He'd go nuts in that stadium if he played there any time soon. The Rockies
would run up football totals every game.
Well almost every game.
George
|
63.2500 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Jun 28 1996 12:57 | 16 |
|
You put any one of the following players in Coors Field and
your will see 65 HRs, Belle, Vaughn, Griffey, Bunher, Thomas, or
maybe even Sammy Sosa. Sosa already plays in the NL, and wouldn't
have to adjust to the pitchers. The players I mentioned except
Bunher have consistently hit over .300, so the NL pitchers shouldn't
effect them that much.
ESPN put up this years stats for Colorado based on home and
away games. The trend of the last 2/3 years is continuing. Colorado
is hitting TWICE as many HR's at home then away, plus all other
stats including batting average was a lot higher at home.
Ron
|
63.2501 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 28 1996 14:31 | 8 |
|
So if you use the 2:1 ratio and assume Belle's HRs were split equally
last year that would give him 25 on the road and 50 at home => 75
total. Trust me, some big power hitter is going to eventually make it
to that banjobox and destroy the single season HR record.
I'd knock Sosa off the list, no way would he hit 65, but I would add
McGwire to the list.
|
63.2502 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 28 1996 14:47 | 9 |
|
> Trust me, some big power hitter is going to eventually make it
> to that banjobox and destroy the single season HR record.
^^^^^^^^
"thin air" would work much better there...
Joe
|
63.2503 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:03 | 28 |
|
In his Sunday Column, Gammons indicated that he'd take Boggs for
his all-* team, in a close race over Naehring, Sprague, and Ventura.
OBP SLG
Boggs .406 .421
Naehring .409 .539
Sprague .365 .571
Ventura .371 .502
Now, among those four, Boggs is not an unreasonable choice. Wouldn't
be _my_ choice (I'd have to go with Naehring among that group), but
Boggs isn't unreasonable.
However, there's another AL third baseman with the following stats:
Player A .457 .602
Why, if Player A is a regular AL third baseman, would you even
consider the four guys listed above? He's far better at _both_
getting on base _and_ hitting for power than any of them. It can't
be because of speed; Player A and Naehring are each at 1 SB, 1 CS:
Boggs and Ventura at 0/2, and Sprague at 0/0. Sprague's a bit ahead
in the RBI race (the order being Sprague - Ventura - Player A -
Naehring - big gap - Boggs), but Player A leads the pack in runs
scored (followed by Sprague, Ventura & Boggs, and Naehring).
Joe
|
63.2504 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:10 | 2 |
|
Why not stop playing games and put Thome's name in there?
|
63.2505 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:11 | 3 |
|
Seitzer??
|
63.2506 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:17 | 1 |
| Did you also check Dean Palmer?
|
63.2507 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:27 | 7 |
|
Naehring was making a case for himself this weekend. Detroit
could not get a ball hit on the ground past him. I remember last
year everybody was worried about Tim's defense at 3B. IMO he has
been a better 3B, then he every was at SS or 2B.
Ron
|
63.2508 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:34 | 2 |
|
If it's not Thome, then what's it doing in the Indians' note? :-)
|
63.2509 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:38 | 9 |
| It should be Boggs. Remember, this is not the "best player" game or the
"Hottest spring" game it's the "All Star" game.
Boggs is a star. The rest of the guys are not stars.
If he were having a bad year then fine, time for a new star but he's having
a really good year so he should get the nod.
George
|
63.2510 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:38 | 19 |
|
> Why not stop playing games and put Thome's name in there?
Sorry, I thought it was obvious. My original intent was to post
numbers, but no players, and I got off-track mid thought.
For those interested, other AL third basemen:
OBP SLG
Surhoff .341 .496
Fryman .322 .460
Seitzer .446 .517
Cirillo .398 .506
Hollins .367 .388
Giambi .370 .536
Palmer .364 .544
Joe
|
63.2511 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 10:42 | 22 |
|
> It should be Boggs. Remember, this is not the "best player" game or the
>"Hottest spring" game it's the "All Star" game.
1) I agree that it should not be solely based upon who's having the
best first half. Thome was the best third baseman in the AL last
year as well.
> Boggs is a star. The rest of the guys are not stars.
Ah - so then Sandy Alomar should be the starting catcher?
>If he were having a bad year then fine, time for a new star but he's having
>a really good year so he should get the nod.
You can certainly vote that way; I have no particular problem if the
fan vote goes to Boggs.
But the remainder of the roster _has_ been a collection of the best
players.
JOe
|
63.2512 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 11:14 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2511 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> Ah - so then Sandy Alomar should be the starting catcher?
Ivan Rodriguez is a star and should be the starting catcher. He's been on the
all-star team before, he's having a great 1st half and he's been a consistently
good catcher for years.
> You can certainly vote that way; I have no particular problem if the
> fan vote goes to Boggs.
Actually I voted for Tim Naehring. At the game I was at where they handed
out the ballots he hit a grand slam home run in the 1st inning then made
a great defensive play just before they handed out the ballots. After seeing
that I felt, what more can a guy do to get your vote? Since he was one of
the contenders anyway I punch in his name.
George
|
63.2513 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Mon Jul 01 1996 11:24 | 4 |
| I'd take Dan Wilson over Pudge this year. Wilson is having a
career year and deserves the start.
daryll
|
63.2514 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 11:39 | 4 |
|
Joe, we both know Thome is the best offensive 3B in the AL bar none.
Gammons is an idiot. How many times do we have to say this?
|
63.2515 | George got it right | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Mon Jul 01 1996 11:47 | 11 |
| If you wanted an All Star Game played by the best in the game, you would
probably have it selected by experts (and it would still be controversial).
But as George pointed out, this is all about *stardom*, a quality that can
only be conferred by the public, that's why the fans vote for the teams.
In passing, I would add that even the experts might have a reason for
choosing someone other than Thome. He's playing in a park that favors
offense, he is well protected in the Indians' terrifying batting order,
and he is not exactly Brooks Robinson on defense.
Steve
|
63.2516 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 12:17 | 25 |
|
>In passing, I would add that even the experts might have a reason for
>choosing someone other than Thome. He's playing in a park that favors
>offense,
Not convincingly true. Last year, Jacobs Field was a pitcher's
park - both the Indians and their opponenets scored more runs
elsewhere than at the Jake.
At Jacobs: 400 Runs scored, 272 Runs allowed
Elsewhere (equal # of games): 440 Runs scored, 335 Runs allowed
> he is well protected in the Indians' terrifying batting order,
...and no study of the matter has shown any significant effect
from protection (except that it reduces intentional walks)...
>and he is not exactly Brooks Robinson on defense.
No, but he's got above average range, and makes an average number
of errors. Of the four Gammons mentioned, only Naehring has a clear
defensive edge over Thome, and I'd take Thome's defense before
Sprague's.
Joe
|
63.2517 | Check it out | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Mon Jul 01 1996 12:30 | 12 |
| Well, I had occasion to look it up a couple of weeks ago, and my recollection
is that Jacobs Field is very much a home run park, which of course is a
significant portion of Thome's imposing slugging percentage. The reliability
of my memory, however, has been called into question in this forum and
elsewhere (can't offhand think just where).
But the numbers aren't really the issue. The perception is, and that's
what the fans are voting on. It's interesting that Thome is being overlooked
*despite* postseason exposure, the lack of which is most commonly the reason
that an otherwise deserving player is slighted.
Steve
|
63.2518 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 12:34 | 4 |
|
Who said Thome is being overlooked. Hargrove picks the reserves,
doesn't he?
|
63.2519 | He should definitely go | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Mon Jul 01 1996 12:40 | 9 |
| Oh, I fully expect him to be there. The point is that despite having played
and starred in the postseason last year and putting up stellar numbers this
year, he still doesn't have sufficient star quality to be voted in by the
fans. Frankly, he'd have a good shot at my vote, if I were voting, though
it's not as clear cut as some positions. But he doesn't seem to have been
able to capture the imagination or attention of the fan at large. Why, I
wonder?
Steve
|
63.2520 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 12:47 | 5 |
|
I think Thome was second in balloting and with the Indians sold out
for the entire year, he still might have a shot. I haven't seen
the latest all-star vote totals.
|
63.2521 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 12:54 | 9 |
| I don't think they are taking ballots any more. I was at Fenway Friday night
and we didn't get ballots.
There's nothing wrong with Thome as a 2nd selection but I wouldn't say he
stands out ahead of Boggs, Naehring, Ventura and the others. In fact if given
my choice of A.L. 3rd basemen I'd take Jeff Cirillo from the Brewers. He's
starting to play like an all-star and he's got more of a future then the rest.
George
|
63.2522 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jul 01 1996 12:59 | 5 |
| >Well, I had occasion to look it up a couple of weeks ago, and my recollection
>is that Jacobs Field is very much a home run park, which of course is a
>significant portion of Thome's imposing slugging percentage.
For 1995, Jacobs Field was almost an *exactly* average home run park.
|
63.2523 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 14:12 | 11 |
|
> There's nothing wrong with Thome as a 2nd selection but I wouldn't say he
>stands out ahead of Boggs, Naehring, Ventura and the others. In fact if given
>my choice of A.L. 3rd basemen I'd take Jeff Cirillo from the Brewers. He's
>starting to play like an all-star and he's got more of a future then the rest.
Cirillo's got more of a future than Thome, who's a year younger?
Yeah, right.
Joe
|
63.2524 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 14:23 | 6 |
|
Joe, I bet if we look at George's rotis roster he has Cirillo and not
Thome... I love this excuse anyways "He's starting to play like an
all-star". When did he start playing like one, last week? last month?
at the start of the season?
|
63.2525 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 14:48 | 4 |
| His numbers look pretty good to me. He seems to have the 3rd base job for
the Brewers pretty much locked up.
George
|
63.2526 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 14:49 | 3 |
|
"He seems to have the 3rd base job for the Brewers pretty much locked
up" *DOES NOT* mean he is an all-star.
|
63.2527 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 14:59 | 4 |
|
I have a good feeling about him and I think he's going to be an all-star.
George
|
63.2528 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 15:04 | 13 |
|
George, Cirillo's numbers _are_ pretty good.
Thome's are significantly better.
Their numbers (together, this time, so no one has to flip
back and forth between notes):
OBP SLG
Cirillo .398 .506
Thome .457 .602
Joe
|
63.2529 | Spin Control???? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 01 1996 15:07 | 3 |
|
Looks Like Thome's are a little better George.
|
63.2530 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 16:00 | 11 |
| I'd still take Jeff Cirillo as my 3B if given a choice of what's out there
today. When you throw in defense and the rate at which he's been improving
the last couple years I think he's going to be all-star caliber for some time
to come.
Everyone on that list is a fine 3rd baseman but I just don't see where
Thome stands out above the rest. Fine, he's having a hot 1st half on a team
where he's surrounded by great hitters but over the next 5 years I still feel
Cirillo will be the better all around 3rd baseman.
George
|
63.2531 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 16:20 | 8 |
|
Thome is younger, and better than Cirillo, and I think history will
prove him to be a much better player when all is said and done.
Now, using the "surrounded by hitters" arguement, I think that even
makes a stronger case for Thome (if you believe this is valid - and
I don't) - because Milwaukee leads the league in runs scored, so
obviously Cirillo is benefitting from a better line-up.
|
63.2532 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 16:34 | 41 |
|
> Everyone on that list is a fine 3rd baseman but I just don't see where
>Thome stands out above the rest. Fine, he's having a hot 1st half on a team
>where he's surrounded by great hitters but over the next 5 years I still feel
>Cirillo will be the better all around 3rd baseman.
George...
OK, I'll present OBP and SLG numbers for _last_ year, for leading
AL all-star candidates this year:
OBP SLG
Player A .347 .409
Player B .412 .422
Player C .384 .498
Player D .378 .492
Player E .415 .448
Player F .438 .558
Player G .371 .442
Player H .333 .407
Player I .395 .421
The players whose stats are listed are Boggs, Cirillo, Fryman, Naehring,
Seitzer, Sprague, Surhoff, Thome, and Ventura - not in that order.
(Palmer had only 119 at bats last year; all those listed above played
essentially regularly.)
Thome's just having a hot 1st half, or so you say. Care to guess
which of the above lines belongs to him?
I rarely have any desire to bet any significant amount of money, but
I would be more than happy to wager that Thome ends his career with
a higher OBP _and_ SLG than Cirillo. If injuries hit neither, Thome
will also have a large advantage in any counting category you'd care
to mention save speed categories.
Don't get me wrong - I'm not putting down Cirillo. I think he's a
decent player, and will be a good regular for a few years. But
Thome is head and shoulders above him.
Joe
|
63.2533 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 01 1996 16:42 | 8 |
|
Let me guess. Is Thome an F'er???
Chap
|
63.2534 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 16:43 | 20 |
|
George, since you enjoy runs created...
Park adjusted, runs created per 26 outs (as of 6/9 - sorry, I couldn't
find anything more recent):
Naehring: 9.47
Giambi: 8.38
Surhoff: 8.24
Ventura: 8.07
Cirillo: 7.78
Palmer: 7.29
Sprague: 6.75
Boggs: 6.72
And Thome: 11.11
More up-to-date stuff when I see it...
Joe
|
63.2535 | Cather: Rodrigues,Piazza | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Mon Jul 01 1996 16:59 | 12 |
| Here are the starters for the all star game:
American National
1b Thomas McGriff
2b Alomar Biggio
ss Ripken Larkin
3b Boggs ("Legendary") Williams
of Lofton Gwynn
of Griffey Bonds
of Belle Bichette
Those aren't my quotes
|
63.2536 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:05 | 13 |
| I'm not sure why you are still talking about the All Star game, my comments
on Cirillo had to do with who I would like to have on my team. I'd go with
Cirillo because I think that despite Thome's hot bat right now, Cirillo is
almost as good offensively and much better defensively.
As for the all-star game, as I said before Boggs should be on the team
because this is not the "best hitter" game or the "hottest spring" game but the
"all star" game.
I defy you to show me numbers of any sort that show Thome as more of a
star than Boggs.
George
|
63.2537 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:09 | 4 |
| > I defy you to show me numbers of any sort that show Thome as more of a
>star than Boggs.
Very brave, George. Stand behind an flexible definition...
|
63.2538 | Does that count??? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:14 | 3 |
|
I like Thome More!
|
63.2539 | Cirillo is okay, but Thome is clearly the best of the bunch | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:18 | 2 |
|
If Chappy likes Thome better, I do too!
|
63.2540 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:24 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2537 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "It's Baseball And You're An American" >>>
>Very brave, George. Stand behind an flexible definition...
I have no choice, it's the only definition. As I said, they don't call it the
"Best Hitter Game" or the "Hot Spring Game", it's the "All Star Game".
Boggs is a star. Thome and Cirillo may be stars some day but they are not
there yet. Tim Naehring was a star and got my vote because he hit a grand slam
the day I voted and made a spectacular play the inning I voted. For that moment
he was even a bigger star than Boggs, at least in front of the 27,000 fans with
which I was sharing the stadium.
"All Star Game". Vote for the biggest star.
Offensive numbers? That's for Rotisserie and that's where Thome looks the
best. As for betting my future on a real 3b? That's where I like Cirillo.
George
|
63.2541 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:26 | 8 |
|
Tim Naehring was a star, but Thome may be a star some day? This pretty
much sums up the entire situation. READ MY WORDS - Naehring has
*NEVER* been a better player than Thome.
Fack(tm) - if George had Thome on his rotis team, he'd like Thome best
of all!
|
63.2542 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:31 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2541 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> Tim Naehring was a star, but Thome may be a star some day? This pretty
> much sums up the entire situation. READ MY WORDS - Naehring has
> *NEVER* been a better player than Thome.
Well there we disagree. I think they are pretty close and the fact that
Naehring is improving at defense at a new position means he'll pass Thome on
defense soon enough if he hasn't already.
But both pale by comparison to Boggs when you are picking a star who is
currently having a good enough season to be a contender. The chicken man is a
living legend.
George
|
63.2543 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:34 | 25 |
|
> Offensive numbers? That's for Rotisserie and that's where Thome looks the
>best. As for betting my future on a real 3b? That's where I like Cirillo.
HR and BA and SB and RBI are rotisserie numbers, sure.
OBP and SLG are what win ball games.
BTW, Thome's current RC/game, using your formula, stands at 10.4.
On what do you base your belief that Cirillo will be a better 3b
than Thome?
Thome:
1) Clearly performs at a higher offensive level currently.
2) Is younger, and therefore likely to grow more and decline more
slowly.
3) Is an above average third baseman; while not the best in the
league, what indication there is suggests that if anything,
Thome's the better defensive player of the two.
Joe
|
63.2544 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:36 | 12 |
|
> Well there we disagree. I think they are pretty close and the fact that
>Naehring is improving at defense at a new position means he'll pass Thome on
>defense soon enough if he hasn't already.
George,
I've already granted that Naehring's a better defensive 3rd baseman
than Thome. Naehring would even be my pick as a backup to Thome at
the all-* game. But there's no way he's a bigger star than Thome...
Joe
|
63.2545 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:47 | 4 |
|
No Joe, he said Naehring *IS* a star and that Thome may someday be a
star!
|
63.2546 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:55 | 28 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2543 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> 1) Clearly performs at a higher offensive level currently.
... in a power packed lineup. And yes the Brewers are starting to put up
some decent offensive numbers but the Indians hitting around Thome already
have the reputation that intimidates A.L. Pitching. No one goes into County
Stadium intimidated.
> 2) Is younger, and therefore likely to grow more and decline more
> slowly.
They are less than a year apart.
> 3) Is an above average third baseman; while not the best in the
> league, what indication there is suggests that if anything,
> Thome's the better defensive player of the two.
As you know defense is almost impossible to measure. I'm just going on what
I've seen.
RE Thome is already a star.
Thome is not a star. A really fine player yes but he's got a long way to
go before you would call him a star. In spite of being in the World Series
he's still relatively unknown.
George
|
63.2547 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 01 1996 17:56 | 10 |
| Re <<< Note 63.2545 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> No Joe, he said Naehring *IS* a star and that Thome may someday be a
> star!
No, I didn't say that. I said that Naehring was a star on that one day
in front of that one crowd. I never claimed that Naehring was a star the
way Boggs is a star.
George
|
63.2548 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Jul 02 1996 08:01 | 16 |
|
When I heard the most_popular_player game starters anounced yesterday
I knew Thome would be the guy to get boned. He is at least 2 levels
above any 3B'man in the AL. Dean Palmer is the closest and he's quite
a ways back. Naerhing is a good player, nothing great, I certianly
would not rank him with Thome, Palmer, Ventura and Fryman. Thome got
boned plain and simple. Its not the first time a deserving starter has
gotton bumped for a "name" and this won't be the last. Vaughn should
be the AL starter for 1B but Thomas and Vaughn are the two best in the
leauge and if Hargrove dosen't name Vaughn it'll be sour grapes. Mo is
the only Red Sox player that should even be allowed to watch the game
let alone play in it. Well thats a bit harsh Clemens has pitched well
with no support.
Jerry
|
63.2549 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 02 1996 09:19 | 22 |
|
George,
I know you've read Bill James. And his study showed the same thing
that every study has: protection doesn't exist. Protection in the
lineup cuts down on intentional walks, but has no significant effect
upon non-IBB at bats.
What prompted James, as you may recall, was the comments made by an
announcer w.r.t. Bob Horner hitting behind Dale Murphy. When Horner
left Atlanta, it was predicted that Murphy's numbers would suffer.
They didn't.
The same type of event has happened many times in baseball, and the
result has almost always been the same - no significant effect.
The lineup around Thome _does_ have an effect upon his RS and RBI
totals. But OBP and SLG are mostly independent; there is no reason
whatsoever to believe that if they switched places, Cirillo would
suddenly look like the better hitter (or even come close).
Joe
|
63.2550 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jul 02 1996 09:42 | 20 |
| If Bill James has one weakness it is that he gets a little sloppy with
statistical analysis. His Runs Created really holds up well but if he really
drew that conclusion from the example you discussed then this analysis is
flawed.
First, just looking at one guy over 2 season is too small a sample size.
Beyond that this is a very hard thing to measure since there can be a number
of factors that cause someone's offensive stats to change from year to year.
With Runs Created he's looking at hundreds of major league players per year
generating thousands of runs and the statistics he's looking at for performance
and runs are drawn from the same set of games. Looking at 1 guy over 2 seasons
with the two sets of numbers drawn from the 2 different seasons doesn't say
much of anything at all.
For example, Kirby Pucket's numbers have dropped off dramatically this year.
Should we ignore his eye problems and use that to counter the arguments for a
juiced ball?
George
|
63.2551 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 02 1996 10:05 | 6 |
|
I get it George, you agree will Bill James when he supports your side,
but you disagree when his analysis supports the other side.
Give it up, Cirillo is an *OKAY* 3b, Thome is by far the cream of the
crop.
|
63.2552 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 02 1996 10:27 | 38 |
|
Jerry,
> When I heard the most_popular_player game starters anounced yesterday
> I knew Thome would be the guy to get boned.
No big deal. Having the public choose the starters isn't a bad thing,
so long as people keep in mind that they aren't necessarily the best
players.
> He is at least 2 levels above any 3B'man in the AL. Dean Palmer is
> the closest and he's quite a ways back.
I'm not absolutely certain Palmer's closest, though he may well be.
> Naerhing is a good player, nothing great, I certianly
> would not rank him with Thome, Palmer, Ventura and Fryman.
Um - while I wouldn't rank him with Thome, he certainly does rank
with Palmer, Ventura, and Fryman. He's clearly having the second
best year of any AL third baseman.
> Vaughn should
> be the AL starter for 1B but Thomas and Vaughn are the two best in the
> leauge and if Hargrove dosen't name Vaughn it'll be sour grapes.
True, though you _have_ to take McGwire as well - other than health,
his numbers have been comparable, and in the toughest park to hit in
in the AL...
> Mo is
> the only Red Sox player that should even be allowed to watch the game
> let alone play in it.
Naehring wouldn't be undeserving as the third third baseman, and
Stanley would be an excellent choice.
Joe
|
63.2553 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 02 1996 10:29 | 9 |
|
George,
James _didn't_ look at one guy over 2 seasons. That was what _started_
the whole thing, but it certainly didn't end there.
James looked at _hundreds_ of players over two seasons.
Joe
|
63.2554 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jul 02 1996 10:30 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2551 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> I get it George, you agree will Bill James when he supports your side,
> but you disagree when his analysis supports the other side.
No, I agree with Bill James when he makes sense and I disagree with him
when he doesn't.
Looking at what I actually said can you see any reason why I'm not correct
in saying that Runs Created holds up while the one time analysis of Dale
Murphy does not? Or are you just busting my chops?
George
|
63.2555 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jul 02 1996 10:34 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2553 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> James looked at _hundreds_ of players over two seasons.
Well that's better but I still don't like the idea that for each player he's
comparing stats from different seasons. As I said with Runs Created for each
case he's looking at the individual production numbers and runs scored from
the same season.
What this relies on is that careers coming and going, medical problems,
fences moving in and out, new stadiums, other hot players replacing the guy
who left and all the other variables from season all have to average out.
George
|
63.2556 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jul 02 1996 11:03 | 7 |
|
During last nights Sox/Yankees game they put up all the stats of
the 6 top 3B in the AL, They only showed Average, Hr's, and RBI. Tim
Naehring was 3rd in each category. Thome was 1st in Hr's and Rbi's and
4th in average.
Ron
|
63.2557 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Jul 02 1996 11:25 | 13 |
| Horner absolutely "made" Murphy and it wasn't long after Horner's
departure for various reasons that Murphy and the Braves went into
their long decline. Horner was a professional hitter totally dangerous
but subject to injury and weight problems.
I can't give dates specifically but Murphy did go into a decline after
Horner left. Stats are all you have if you can't get to the games or
at least watch on tv; they even can help balance what you do see but
baseball isn't really played that way.
The nightmare is that Dan Duquette is paying attention to these modern
stat-masters except according to Joe, Alicea and Tinsley showed up well
in the stats.
|
63.2558 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 02 1996 11:59 | 26 |
|
> Horner absolutely "made" Murphy and it wasn't long after Horner's
> departure for various reasons that Murphy and the Braves went into
> their long decline.
Murphy declined because he started to get _old_, not because Horner
was gone. His first year after Horner left was every bit as good
at his last when Horner was there - and even while Horner was there,
Murphy's performance was equally good with and without Horner in
the lineup.
> I can't give dates specifically but Murphy did go into a decline after
> Horner left. Stats are all you have if you can't get to the games or
> at least watch on tv; they even can help balance what you do see but
> baseball isn't really played that way.
Stats give an excellent (albeit not complete) picture of offensive
and pitching performances. Statistics aren't how the game _is_
played, but they give an excellent description of how a game _was_
played.
The same people who downplay the use of statistics in viewing
baseball are usually those who will tell you Andre Dawson deserved
the 1987 MVP because he hit 49 HR.
Joe
|
63.2559 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 02 1996 12:04 | 7 |
|
Reportedly, Grover is considering taking Vizquel over ARod for
the all-star game.
Yuck, yuck, yuck. I most sincerely hope the rumor is false.
Joe
|
63.2560 | :-) | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 02 1996 12:05 | 2 |
|
Vizquel is better defensively!
|
63.2561 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 02 1996 12:06 | 4 |
|
Maybe. I'd still take Rodriguez in a heartbeat.
Joe
|
63.2562 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Jul 02 1996 12:06 | 10 |
| So Joe, did your stat allow you to predict the Redsox collapse with the
replacement of the centerfielder and second baseman with two total
stiffs? Granted, Cordero being off the chart couldn't have a
statistical base and perhaps Hosey's sample was small.
But to have validity these stats have to allow you to make predictions
and the above was a perfect opportunity. I will make you a prediction:
The Whitesox will beat out the Indians for first place in the Central.
Lofton is the key and if comes back from the break playing the way he
can perhaps I'll be wrong.
|
63.2563 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 02 1996 12:09 | 2 |
|
Vizquel has WS experience.
|
63.2564 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jul 02 1996 12:20 | 9 |
|
Hargrove would have to be an idiot to pick Vizquel. Omar has
a problem with his throwing shoulder, he will probably have off
season surgery, Give him the time off.
Either that or Hargrove will name all of his injured players to
the team. So they can get there 50K bonuses, then have them decline
because of injury.
Ron
|
63.2565 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 02 1996 12:24 | 7 |
|
Maybe Hargrove will name him, he'll get the 50K bonus and then replace
him or not play him... no too dumb, huh! Same game all the other
managers play.
He better name Thome, and Nagy should be the starting pitcher.
|
63.2566 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 02 1996 12:35 | 61 |
|
> So Joe, did your stat allow you to predict the Redsox collapse with the
> replacement of the centerfielder and second baseman with two total
> stiffs?
No; stats are _somewhat_ useful for predictions, but not when it
comes to pitching - wherein lies the Sox collapse.
> Granted, Cordero being off the chart couldn't have a
> statistical base and perhaps Hosey's sample was small.
Actually, Hosey's sample size wasn't _that_ small; however, his
performance this year _is_ a small sample size. The fact that
Hosey, at his peak, was a borderline major league player should
have been a hint - and _was_, as Duquette had back up plans in place.
> But to have validity these stats have to allow you to make predictions
> and the above was a perfect opportunity.
That is absolutely _not_ the case. Statistics can be valid independent
of their ability to predict future events.
Pitching statistics (particularly ERA, but also H/9, BB/9, K/9, extra
base hits allowed, and so on) provide an excellent picture of what
has happened. But the standard deviation on pitching stats is very
large (as long term statistical analysis has shown); therefore, they
aren't terribly useful in predictions.
Hitting stats have a much smaller standard deviation, and therefore
are of much more use in making predictions. There still is some
variation, and the league-wide variables are hard to predict. But
you can, given a player's recent performances and age, make a
reasonable guess as to what they will do.
> I will make you a prediction:
> The Whitesox will beat out the Indians for first place in the Central.
It could happen - my concern about Chicago isn't a big secret...
> Lofton is the key and if comes back from the break playing the way he
> can perhaps I'll be wrong.
Actually, Lofton's not the major problem as I see it. The major
problems are:
1) Baerga. He's having a _really_ bad year; Grover got hit out of
the three slot for a while, but needs to keep him out until he
starts hitting.
2) Franco. His performance has been great; his health is a question.
3) Murray. He's been playing almost as poorly as Baerga.
4) Martinez. Again, health questions.
5) McDowell. And again.
There are many possibly solutions for most of these problems - but
_not_ for Baerga.
Joe
|
63.2567 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jul 03 1996 09:38 | 35 |
|
_Now_ Thome's been robbed, and by his own manager, even.
My all-star picks (w/ the same requirements Hargrove had to work
with)
Starters:
C: Ivan Rodriguez
1B: Frank Thomas
2B: Roberto Alomar
SS: Cal Ripken
3B: Wade Boggs
LF: Albert Belle
CF: Kenny Lofton
RF: Ken Griffey
Reserves:
C: Dan Wilson (if I really wanted a third catcher, Steinbach or Stanley
would be a better pick than Alomar)
1B: Mo Vaughn, Mark McGwire (Palmiero, while a good player, is _not_
an omission)
2B: Chuck Knoblauch, Mark Lewis (a better pick from Detroit than
Fryman)
SS: Alex Rodriguez
3B: Edgar Martinez, Jim Thome
OF: Brady Anderson, Tim Salmon, Greg Vaughn (Bernie Williams as the
replacement for Griffey)
SP: Charles Nagy (starter), Juan Guzman, Kevin Appier, Alex Fernandez,
Andy Pettitte, Roger Clemens
RP: John Wetteland, Roberto Hernandez, Troy Percival
Joe
|
63.2568 | :-( | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Jul 03 1996 10:09 | 6 |
|
Bernie was Robbed, Jobbed, and Knobbed!!
Joe Carter...Jeez
|
63.2569 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jul 03 1996 10:14 | 4 |
|
While Bernie has a case, he wasn't as badly robbed as Thome...
Joe
|
63.2571 | bad boys? | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Jul 03 1996 11:57 | 120 |
|
ESPNET SportsZone | Major League Baseball
BAD BOYS OF BASEBALL? INDIANS AMUSED BY LABEL
From ESPN SportsCenter
_________________________________________________________________
Being very good, while being very bad.
It's a delicate balance few franchises have ever pulled off: The
Oakland Raiders ... The Detroit Pistons ... The Cleveland Indians?
While the Indians don't yet have the championship rings to live up to
this select company, they do have the headlines, suspensions and
downright surliness to live down to it. However, unlike the Pistons
or Raiders, it's a reputation that the team might not be so willing
to embrace.
Mike Hargrove Hargrove
_________________________________________________________________
"I think the perception of the majority of people that follow
baseball, even the people that don't follow baseball, is that this
ballclub has a bunch of bad actors and a bunch of bad guys," Cleveland
manager Mike Hargrove said.
Dan O'Dowd, Cleveland's director of baseball operations, said the
Indians are caught trying to walk a very fine line. "We've got a lot
of confidence. We've got a lot of swagger, and we play the game hard,
and we play the game the right way," he said. "But unfortunately, I
think we're hated, and we're feared at the same time."
Cleveland center fielder [IMAGE] Kenny Lofton said the image is
unwarranted.
[IMAGE] Kenny Lofton says Cleveland's bad image is a bad rap.
_________________________________________________________________
"They're calling the Indians 'the Bad Boys?' " he said with a hint of
disdain. "I mean, you have one bad apple, and now your whole situation
is going wrong? We have one incident here or there, and now our whole
team and our whole situation is considered bad."
In modern sports, it has become trendy to root for the renegade; none
wore the black hat any prouder than the Raiders, and not so
coincidentally, no team outsold them in terms of merchandising. And
love them or hate them, the Indians have become the biggest attraction
in baseball.
You can't buy a ticket at Jacobs Field, where the Indians average
almost 43,000 per game. Moreover, they are almost as big a draw on the
road, where they are leading the American League in average road
attendance.
"Five years ago, it was the exact reverse of that," Hargrove said.
"You know, you could get a ticket to an Indians game just about
anytime or anywhere you wanted. And we've become a draw whether people
want to come and boo us or come cheer for us."
Carlos Baerga Baerga
_________________________________________________________________
Cleveland second baseman [IMAGE] Carlos Baerga welcomes the change. "I
remember when we used to be in last place all the time. Every time
we'd go to Toronto or to Oakland, it was nice to see their ballpark
packed all the time, and the people would follow their team anywhere
they'd go, and now it's the Cleveland Indians."
While American League pitchers have been trying to figure out how to
silence the big bats of the Indians, Cleveland's front office staff
has been brainstorming almost as hard trying to figure out how to get
some of the player who carry those big bats to speak up. [IMAGE]
Albert Belle and [IMAGE] Eddie Murray, in particular, refuse to talk
with the press.
"Five minutes a day would cure a lot of ills, as far as talking with
the media and probably deflecting a lot of the criticism that comes
the Indians' way," Hargrove said.
O'Dowd said club officials talked to the players, but he added that
they don't want to press the issue too much.
Added Hargrove, "Personally, I think (the players) should talk, but
that really enters into the area of 'none of my business.' "
Albert Belle Some say Albert Belle's bad-boy image is creating an
unfair perception of all the Indians.
_________________________________________________________________
If fans and reporters could make a movie about the Indians, fairly or
unfairly, Belle would certainly be cast in the villain's role.
"I don't know that I really understand Albert totally. I don't think
anybody does," Hargrove said. "I think people understand as much about
Albert as he'll allow them to understand."
And apparently that doesn't work in Belle's favor.
"They look at Albert as a bad guy, but he's not a bad guy," Lofton
said. "He's a very intense guy that shows his emotions more than
others, but you get other guys on other teams that show their emotions
just as well as he does, and nothing happens to them."
If Belle the individual is being singled out, could the Tribe as a
team be targeted too?
"Maybe it's because they know we're good," Baerga mused. "Every time
we go on the field, we always think we're going to win. That's the
feeling we have."
And it's a feeling that gets stronger as the team gets better.
"'Me against the world' and that's what we feel like, it's us against
everyone else," Lofton said with more than a hint of pride. "And we
feel like we're in that position right now (since) everyone's against
us."
_________________________________________________________________
|
63.2572 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Wed Jul 03 1996 14:14 | 7 |
|
Glenn, when healthy Naerhing is a nice player. Never said he wasn't.
I just don't think he's the great all-star next comming of Mike Schmidt
that most Red Sox fans seem to think he is.
Jerry
|
63.2573 | can't wait to hear this one... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jul 03 1996 17:32 | 15 |
| > I'd hardly equate a beer shower with pelting someone with
> batteries, bats and baseballs and other items thrown with
> the expressed intent of doing physical damage but then I'm
> not a Yankees 'fan' so such distinctions don't escape me. Joe,
> at least three or four times a year you have to come in here
> and make lame excuses for the neanderthal behavior of the losers
> who populate the stands at Yankee Stadium. I'd think you'd have
> grown tired of it by now and would just fess up that they're
> scumbags.
Tommy, I'm dying to hear your spin on the woman just arrested in
Cincinnati for planning to bomb Barry Larkin with a Molotov cocktail ?
She's probably originally from NY, right ?
|
63.2574 | For the record | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Fri Jul 05 1996 10:30 | 13 |
| >> >Well, I had occasion to look it up a couple of weeks ago, and my recollection
>> >is that Jacobs Field is very much a home run park, which of course is a
>> >significant portion of Thome's imposing slugging percentage.
>> For 1995, Jacobs Field was almost an *exactly* average home run park.
In fact, since it was opened it has been an almost perfectly neutral park.
I looked it up when I got home Monday night, saw that my memory had failed
me again, and shook a couple dozen dead brain cells out of my left ear.
I might have mixed it up with Camden Yard.
Steve
|
63.2575 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 08 1996 09:51 | 38 |
|
For George:
RC totals, along with park adjusted totals. I'm not really certain
what the "value" field is, to be honest. Totals through 7/3.
RC/27 PRC/27 Value
Jim Thome, Cleveland 11.02 10.41 39.3 (big snub)
Jason Giambi, Oakland 8.05 8.30 31.9 (another one)
Matt Williams, San Francisco 7.57 7.92 29.7
Robin Ventura, Chicago-A 7.27 7.90 29.1
Tim Naehring, Boston 8.31 7.72 19.9
Dean Palmer, Texas 7.66 7.69 26.6
Jeff Cirillo, Milwaukee 7.58 7.55 22.2
Ed Sprague, Toronto 7.80 7.26 23.6
Wade Boggs, New York-A 7.04 7.17 20.2
Chipper Jones, Atlanta 7.36 7.03 22.5
B. J. Surhoff, Baltimore 6.48 6.73 16.7
Keith Lockhart, Kansas City 6.67 6.70 14.4
Ken Caminiti, San Diego 6.11 6.67 16.8
Leo Gomez, Chicago-N 6.62 6.31 11.7
AVERAGE REGULAR 3B 6.22
Shane Andrews, Montreal 6.27 5.79 8.2
Jeff Kent, New York-N 5.05 5.67 10.5
Sean Berry, Houston 5.44 5.62 9.1
Todd Zeile, Philadelphia 5.26 5.49 9.6
Mike Blowers, Los Angeles 4.94 5.35 7.6
Vinny Castilla, Colorado 7.17 5.34 8.1
Travis Fryman, Detroit 5.23 5.23 7.4 (VERY undeserving)
Dave Hollins, Minnesota 5.33 4.82 3.3
Russ Davis, Seattle 4.27 4.56 0.8
Tim Wallach, California 4.61 4.52 0.6
REPLACEMENT LEVEL? 4.40
Jeff Branson, Cincinnati 4.10 4.35 -0.2
Charlie Hayes, Pittsburgh 4.33 4.15 -2.1
Gary Gaetti, St. Louis 4.05 4.04 -2.6
Terry Pendleton, Florida 3.56 3.77 -5.3
|
63.2577 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 08 1996 10:01 | 10 |
|
As reported in the Cleveland Plain Dealer (Sunday, July 7th):
"Roger Clemens told his agent that he wouldn't mind getting traded to
the Indians in the second half."
Looks like Clemens wants out of losersville, USA now... probably has
nothing to do with the team though - he probably just doesn't like
the New England attitude, the drivers and the chowder, and he wants to
move back to his birth state.
|
63.2578 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 08 1996 10:02 | 25 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2575 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
> For George:
>
> RC totals, along with park adjusted totals. I'm not really certain
> what the "value" field is, to be honest. Totals through 7/3.
>
For Joe:
You keep making the assumption that "Given that the all-star team should be
the regular players who had the best offensive stats during the 1st half of the
season ..."
You are in good company, most baseball fans seem to feel that way but I
disagree. It's not the "Hot 1st half game", it's the "All-star game". Granted
who ever is elected should still be putting up decent numbers but having a
good 1st half doesn't make you a star since most people don't even start
thinking about baseball until after the all-star break.
Wade Boggs is a star who is still putting up decent numbers. The rest of the
A.L. guys on that list, while racking up some pretty impressive totals, are not
stars. They are not even close to being stars.
George
|
63.2579 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 08 1996 10:04 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2577 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> As reported in the Cleveland Plain Dealer (Sunday, July 7th):
>
> "Roger Clemens told his agent that he wouldn't mind getting traded to
> the Indians in the second half."
Now there's a source if I ever saw one. No question Roger Clemens would
confide in the Cleveland Plain Dealer before he talked to anyone else.
George
|
63.2580 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 08 1996 10:39 | 26 |
|
> You keep making the assumption that "Given that the all-star team should be
>the regular players who had the best offensive stats during the 1st half of the
>season ..."
1) Where did I _ever_ mention the all star game?
(Oops - I see the confusion. The comments about the ASG were included
in the original post - I neglected to clip them. My intent was to
post the data for the sake of comparing third basemen, _not_ for
the sake of arguing about the ASG.)
2) It is _not_ my contention, opinion, or belief that the ASG
participants should be based upon 1st half performance only.
How _I_ believe ASG participants should be chosen is as follows:
Starters - by fan vote. Give the fans who they want.
Reserves - by performance. 1st half performance weighs most
heavily, but should be closely followed by performance
in the second half of the previous season. Performances
before that should be given some weight, decreasing
with age.
Joe
|
63.2581 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 08 1996 12:07 | 4 |
| Don't forget the part about how the coach is required to include at least
one player from each team.
George
|
63.2582 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 08 1996 12:36 | 8 |
|
Why? I was saying how I feel it _should_ be done, not how it _is_
done.
I gave my all-* picks, using the same restrictions Hargrove had,
previously in here...
Joe
|
63.2583 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Jul 10 1996 10:17 | 6 |
|
How did Albert "K" Belle do in the All-Star game last night?
:^)
Ron
|
63.2584 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jul 10 1996 10:21 | 4 |
| >Is Rivera the latest "next Mickey Mantle"?
Jay Buhner was the "next _insert_Yankee_great_" awhile back, and it looks
like the hype was right.
|
63.2585 | except that he's not a Yankee you mean? | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Wed Jul 10 1996 10:25 | 1 |
|
|
63.2586 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jul 10 1996 11:04 | 4 |
|
Can anyone tell me whether Rogers Clemens winning percentage this year
is better or worse than the Red Sox's team winning percentage?
|
63.2587 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Jul 10 1996 11:11 | 3 |
|
I believe its a little worse.
|
63.2588 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Jul 10 1996 11:36 | 12 |
|
Clemens, winning % is lower then the Sox winning percentage. The
Sox have scored 2 or fewer runs in 9 of Roger's 19 starts. Plus,
the bullpen has blown 6 wins. If Roger were on the Indians and
received the 5+ runs a game that Nagy gets, Roger would be the leading
candidate for Cy Young.
Which player is currently batting under .300, Mo Vaughh or
Albert "K" Belle?
Ron
|
63.2589 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Jul 10 1996 11:46 | 4 |
|
Nice range my Mo last night on first.
|
63.2590 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Wed Jul 10 1996 11:47 | 10 |
|
Judging from Indians losing the World Series last year
and stinking out the all-star game this year, one would
have to conclude that years of playing in an essentially
empty stadium have rendered the Indians incapable of playing
in front of large crowds when the pressure is on. For the
good of the team come playoff time this year, Indians "fans
might want to consider doing what they did for years - ignore
the Indians and stay the hell away from the ballpark. It may
be the only way they can win it all.
|
63.2591 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Jul 10 1996 11:50 | 12 |
|
I wouldn't say the Indians stunk out the joint. Lofton had 2 Stolen
bases. 1 hit and a walk. Albert made a nice stop on that ball to left
center last night. Savinf an inside the park HR.
Chap
|
63.2592 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Wed Jul 10 1996 12:18 | 11 |
| > I wouldn't say the Indians stunk out the joint. Lofton had 2 Stolen
> bases. 1 hit and a walk. Albert made a nice stop on that ball to left
> center last night.
Agreed. Albert didn't have a good night at the plate, but Kenny Lofton showed
why he's the *real* "Prime Time".
>Savinf an inside the park HR.
Maybe a bit of an overstatement. The guy playing next to Albert in the
outfield can run a little and has a good arm.
|
63.2593 | | AWECIM::RUSSO | claimin! | Wed Jul 10 1996 12:28 | 10 |
|
Belle seems to be in a slump, his offensive output has been down lately
if I recall correctly. He didn't look very comfortable or confident at
the plate last night.
Bob Costas is a boob. I don't think there is any need for him plead
with Albert Belle to "get help" while broadcasting the game. As far as
I'm concerned, Costas abused his position (again).
Dave
|
63.2594 | | AWECIM::RUSSO | claimin! | Wed Jul 10 1996 12:29 | 5 |
|
Oh, and Mo certainly typified the Red Sox defense last night.....
|
63.2595 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Wed Jul 10 1996 12:44 | 8 |
|
>Savinf an inside the park HR.
Albert made a decent play but it seemed like Costas & co.
went out of their way to say something positive about him
after basically branding him a nut case. It was little more
than a routine play.
|
63.2596 | nice job...NOT ! | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jul 10 1996 13:53 | 4 |
| How come Hargrove didn't get Greg Vaughn in the game last night ?
And did anyone else read Gammons' article claiming Bernie Williams
to be an MVP candidate and inexplicably being ignored by The_Human_
Rain_Delay for the A-S roster ?
|
63.2597 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jul 10 1996 13:55 | 14 |
| >WAKE UP Chappy. That "next Mantle" tag has been pinned on no less
>than 3 NY rookies over the past few years with Buhner being the
>other one that immediately comes to mind.
BZZZZZTTTTT !!! Wrong. Which rookies have been called such, and
by whom ? And Buhner was being compared to Dimaggio, not Mantle.
>Meanwhile, just how many things were tossed/beers poured over
>Joey in Fenway the past couple days?
>Tell us again how fans are the same everywhere...
Cincinnati woman makes bomb for Larkin ???
|
63.2598 | So says espn Radio last night. | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Jul 10 1996 14:09 | 7 |
|
Greg Vaughn had an upset stomach so he requested not to play.
Chap
|
63.2599 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Wed Jul 10 1996 14:16 | 4 |
| > Greg Vaughn had an upset stomach so he requested not to play.
One of the disadvantages to having the All-Star game in Philadelphia
is the ready availability of cheesesteaks...
|
63.2600 | gotsta be a_excuse | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Jul 10 1996 14:21 | 1 |
| ... and the lack of availability of designated hitters
|
63.2601 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jul 10 1996 14:53 | 32 |
|
>How come Hargrove didn't get Greg Vaughn in the game last night ?
>And did anyone else read Gammons' article claiming Bernie Williams
>to be an MVP candidate and inexplicably being ignored by The_Human_
>Rain_Delay for the A-S roster ?
I disagreed with Grover's selections as well (you can see my picks
earlier in this string), but his picks _were_ consistent with a
(incorrect IMHO) belief - that wins are the mark of good pitching,
not ERA.
If you believe that, then Williams _can't_ be on the roster.
Since this theology devalues Guzman, Joe Carter become the best
candidate for Toronto. Vaughn is Milwaukee's representative.
You can argue that (and I would argue that) Williams is more
deserving than Buhner; so is Tim Salmon, however.
But Williams still is not the most deserving AL player who didn't
go; Grover let his own best player stay in Cleveland.
As for MVP candidates, at this point my ballot would go:
Mark McGwire
Jim Thome
Chuck Knoblauch
Edgar Martinez
Brady Anderson
Mo Vaughn
Frank Thomas
Bernie Williams
Tim Salmon
Juan Gonzalez
|
63.2602 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jul 10 1996 15:18 | 15 |
|
Oops - I missed somebody.
Make that:
Mark McGwire
Jim Thome
Chuck Knoblauch
Edgar Martinez
Brady Anderson
Alex Rodriguez
Mo Vaughn
Frank Thomas
Bernie Williams
Tim Salmon
|
63.2603 | Belle saves his failures for the national stage... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:01 | 11 |
|
As usual, Bob Uecker provided passable comic relief to an otherwise
dreary affair... the AL was fast asleep for most of this one. I
think it's clear that Albert's behavior just places additional
pressure on himself to "show everyone" when it might be easier to
crack a smile once every other season or so. But he'll do it his
way, which only makes it tolerable to see him go down the crapper
whenever the heat is on...
glenn
|
63.2604 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:23 | 9 |
| > As usual, Bob Uecker provided passable comic relief to an otherwise
> dreary affair...
(during a hitting streak discussion)
Costas: "Bob, what was your longest streak?"
Uecker: "Yellow."
|
63.2605 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:26 | 7 |
|
And Costas intro was priceles "of the two gentlemen with me tonight one was
a 10 time all-star and 2 time mvp and the other is simply Mr. Baseball"
Major League > Bull Durham and CaddyShack > any other Sports' movie...
mike
|
63.2606 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:42 | 4 |
|
Uecker's self-deprecating brand of humor was old and tired about
seven years ago. He should have been put out to pasture with the
"Where's the beef?" lady a long time ago.
|
63.2607 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:56 | 28 |
| > Uecker's self-deprecating brand of humor was old and tired about
> seven years ago. He should have been put out to pasture with the
> "Where's the beef?" lady a long time ago.
Obviously, a lot of people disagree with you. However, if this wasn't the
case, you'd be uncomfortable... :-)
I like listening to Uecker because he's very good at explaining baseball
through the eyes of the fringe player, who knew what it was like to have
to work at everything and exploit every advantage. (He seemed to get a
special kick out of Ozzie Smith trying to keep a runner occupied just before
a pickoff move to second.) I particularly like listening to him as he tries
to describe what is going through a catcher's mind as a batter is being pitched
to. I can see how the humor could wear thin, but that's not all of what he's
about.
I like listening to Morgan because:
1) the guy has tremendous credentials ("Joe can't do Sunday Night
Baseball tonight because he's being inducted into the Hall of
Fame.")
2) he's able to express his knowledge in a way that's clear to the
average fan
3) unlike most of the talking heads that broadcast baseball, he's
actually not afraid to voice an opinion. He also does so
without seeming condescending or confrontational.
Costas can be melodramatic at times, but I was pretty happy to hear that
Morgan and Uecker would be on the broadcast crew with him. A nice mix.
|
63.2608 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Wed Jul 10 1996 17:47 | 22 |
|
>> I can see how the humor could wear thin, but that's not all
>> of what he's about.
He'd be just fine without it but I think Costas gets a kick
out of playing the straight man.
>> I like listening to Morgan because:
Next to Joe LaHoud, Morgan was my favorite player as a kid
and I like him just as much as an announcer. He knows the game
well and breaks it down so even casual fans like myself can
understand the thought processes behind what's going on.
>> Costas can be melodramatic at times,
Costas hasn't completely learned that dramatic moments require
no embellishment. Between that and his aw shucks attitude, I'd
rather shave my head with a belt sander then listen to him for
nine whole innings.
|
63.2609 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu Jul 11 1996 10:03 | 2 |
| I dislike Costas about as much as I dislike Scully. Both think they're
as important as the game itself.
|
63.2610 | ya don't have to listen to 'em | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jul 11 1996 10:27 | 12 |
| I don't listen to 'em.
I don't know about y'all but my TV has this device where you can turn the
sound down and/or off.
Most contemporary announcers merit silence. In fack, you can actually
follow the sprots without 'em.
As for audio, I'll take a little John Hiatt, Green Day, Asleep at the
Wheel, or whatever.
TTom
|
63.2611 | Now fill out the rest of the team | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jul 11 1996 12:58 | 6 |
| > Next to Joe LaHoud, Morgan was my favorite player as a kid
Tommy, sometimes you absolutely leave me with aching ribs
I kind of like Phil Plantier myself, tho
|
63.2612 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Sat Jul 13 1996 23:37 | 6 |
|
He's back... Albert rings the Belle for the third straight game.
I hate to tell you front running White Sox fans this, but the
tribe is back into overdrive. Heck, we're probably looking at
a double digit lead by the end of the season.
|
63.2613 | :-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 15 1996 10:14 | 7 |
|
Double digit leads. Ah Yes.
Chap
|
63.2614 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 15 1996 10:16 | 5 |
|
If Thomas is out for any significant period of time, it's very
possible.
Joe
|
63.2615 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 15 1996 14:55 | 13 |
|
Especially now that Hargrove figured out what me and Joe have been
saying for two years... THOME BATS THIRD, BELLE FOURTH AND RAMIREZ
FIFTH.
Other changes - Murray's PT is way done, Carreon and Burnitz are
taking most of his PT. BIG PLUS.
Giles called up, a good bat off the bench - homered in his first
at bat in the bigs - Can you name the last indian to do this?
ANOTHER BIG PLUS.
|
63.2616 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 15 1996 15:33 | 6 |
|
Chappy, since you're a Wins and Loss man... can you tell me who has a
better winning percentage?
Chad Ogea or Andy Pettitte?
|
63.2617 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 15 1996 15:39 | 8 |
|
No I can't. I try not to fantasize about players on inferior teams.
All I know is that Pettitte is 14-4.
But if your an expert on numbers. Who is the best team in the AL
right now.
|
63.2618 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 15 1996 15:59 | 14 |
|
Pettitte is .778
Ogea is .833
Chappy is so confident that the Yankees will finish with a better
record that he won't even make a wager. Secondly, he was so convinced
that Pettitte would be this good that:
a. He didn't draft him prior to the start of the season last
year in the rotis league we are both in and
b. He didn't pick him up with a replacement or free move for
the first three weeks of the season when he was available
(This is the same guy who traded Juan Gonzalez for Dan Gladden!)
|
63.2619 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:22 | 18 |
|
Follow along this time Groaner.
I am a gambler. Almost every weekend, Foxwoods or Poker or Hinsdale
or Plainfield. But I like guys that I bet with to pay up on there bets.
In other words I don't like welchers!
On Pettitte..... I already had 5 Yankees on my team. I read a few
places you should not have too many players from the same team on your
roster.
ON Gonzalez.... He was a rookie, I was a rookie et al.....
Chap
|
63.2620 | You follow.. | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:24 | 7 |
|
Welcher
W e l c h e r???
|
63.2621 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:25 | 5 |
|
I paid up on our wager to the letter of the wager last year. Just
because you didn't clearly explain the wager is not my problem.
|
63.2622 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:27 | 11 |
|
You can't even remember your own lies. It wasn't a wager with me. Care
to try again.
Chap
|
63.2623 | whatever it aint honorable | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:28 | 12 |
| That's why the Las Vegas method of keeping track of bets is so worthwile.
They give you this little slip and it says exactly what the count and
amount is, which side you got and what the event is.
SPROTS betting has nothing to do with betting. Instead it's usually
a_exercise in deceit and chicanery. Hardly a tempting proposition, at
best.
Among the honorable, this rarely is a problem, however.
TTom
|
63.2624 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:35 | 5 |
|
Whenever I've lost. And I think I'm 3-3 in Sports. I have paid up to
the letter of the law. Than again I'm an honorable person. Ask my
bookie!
|
63.2625 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:49 | 2 |
|
I paid up to the letter of the law.
|
63.2626 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:54 | 15 |
|
> SPROTS betting has nothing to do with betting. Instead it's usually
> a_exercise in deceit and chicanery. Hardly a tempting proposition, at
> best.
>
> Among the honorable, this rarely is a problem, however.
And whither MrT?
To his credit, on his deathbed, MrT did own up to damn near ever'
bad thing he'd ever done, and even threw in the admission that
Big Bad John Elway is a stiff...
glenn
|
63.2627 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:58 | 8 |
|
Groaner why do you delete all of your old replies in this topic?
You are unbelievable.
|
63.2628 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 16 1996 00:09 | 5 |
|
I think it was Barry Bonds who summed it up best to the press at the
All-star festivities saying something like "you've got to congratulate
Mo Vaughn for winning the MVP award in the AL last year, but everyone
knows that Albert Belle was the MVP."
|
63.2629 | remember 'em well | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jul 16 1996 09:07 | 14 |
| > And whither MrT?
Honorable, indeed.
It's my recollection that the initial perpetrator of the p-name waging
machinations was ol' BobHunt. He lost a bet that for the nexted couple of
weeks or so, all his notes from a given account would contain the p-name.
He merely noted from another account. For that and his unbelievable faux
pas calling Dean "G"reat and of course a body of work that still lives
on. I should check up on him and see if'n he went anywhere with that
sprots writing.
TTom
|
63.2630 | Does save time, of course | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Fri Jul 19 1996 10:13 | 9 |
| .2627, Chap:
> Groaner why do you delete all of your old replies in this topic?
You know, I wondered about that, too. Reading in "catch-up mode", a week's
worth of notes at a sitting, it makes for peculiar continuity, like hearing
one side of a conversation. Probably the better side.
Steve
|
63.2631 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Sun Jul 21 1996 23:13 | 3 |
|
Tribe deals Murray to Baltimore for Mercker. Good bye Eddie, don't let
the door slap you in the behind on the way out.
|
63.2632 | with any luck Danny the Dunce will get a first rate prospect | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Jul 22 1996 07:06 | 6 |
|
Guess this is the first of the left handed pitchers the tribe is
gonna go get. Moyer will be the next.
Jerry
|
63.2633 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jul 22 1996 09:50 | 7 |
| > Tribe deals Murray to Baltimore for Mercker. Good bye Eddie, don't let
> the door slap you in the behind on the way out.
This doesn't do me a rat's behind worth of good - I own them both in my
Rotisserie league.
Luckily it's Ultra, and I have Mercker squirreled away on a reserve list...
|
63.2634 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jul 22 1996 10:32 | 10 |
|
Moyer's not worth a _third_ rate prospect, Jerry.
And I must say - the only thing I was happy about when reading
Gammon's column yesterday was the fact that he's usually wrong.
The Indians do _not_ need a right handed third baseman - Thome's
got a career .400 OBP vs. lefties (though his power _does_ go down -
but still...).
Joe
|
63.2635 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 22 1996 11:20 | 14 |
| Mercker is really an enigma. After his no-hitter back in '94 there were
people seriously considering the possibility of him breaking into the Braves
starting rotation, probably the toughest place to land a pitching job in the
last few decades. However with Baltimore he's gone nowhere falling off last
year and racking up a 7+ ERA and giving up a home run every 5-6 innings so far
this season.
The question is, which Mercker will show up in Cleveland. He seems to be
on the decline and at best you'd have to say he's had little to no luck in
the American League.
Maybe the tribe is looking to steal pitching signals during the World Series.
George
|
63.2636 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 22 1996 11:34 | 10 |
|
Considering the possibility????
Ah George. He was was your favorite teams 5th statrer last year.
Chap
|
63.2638 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 22 1996 12:15 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2636 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>
> Ah George. He was was your favorite teams 5th statrer last year.
Yes, he was their 5th starter last year. In fact he had 26 starts compared
to 28 or 29 each for the top 4. His 7-8 was better than Avery's 7-13 which
got some people thinking that he might end up breaking into the top 4.
George
|
63.2639 | Credit where due | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Mon Jul 22 1996 12:16 | 12 |
| Karen, for the benefit of those of us out of the reach of the Boston Globe,
could you be a little more specific?
Chap, I think what George meant is that the Braves were considering letting
Avery leave to free agency and handing the job to Mercker. Only Avery's
late season resurgence and excellent postseason changed their minds. Good
thing for them, too.
I expect Mercker to improve in Cleveland, if only because Camden Yard is
such a launching pad.
Steve
|
63.2640 | Probably see Moyer starting a post season game for somebody | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Mon Jul 22 1996 12:17 | 9 |
| Well what did it cost either team? I don't know whether Joe was
stating an opinion or not but to get Moyer would cost the Indians
something. They may try Mercker a few times before the deadline and if he
doesn't work out simply waive him.
But to get Moyer will cost them a reasonable player or prospect since
they'll have to bid against Texas. Mercker may be able to pitch for
the Indians there's something wrong in Baltimore, they haven't had a
shutout all year. (?)
|
63.2641 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 22 1996 12:46 | 6 |
|
Well Steve, what he said was starting rotation. I'm not Kenny Lofton
you know I can't give or receive telepathic signals????
Chap
|
63.2642 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Jul 22 1996 12:53 | 3 |
|
I know that joe
|
63.2644 | KOD from a man who knows nuttin!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 22 1996 13:25 | 3 |
|
Well There goes the season!!! :-(
|
63.2645 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 22 1996 13:27 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2641 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>
> Well Steve, what he said was starting rotation. I'm not Kenny Lofton
> you know I can't give or receive telepathic signals????
Ok, I see what you mean. Yes technically the 5th starter is part of the
starting rotation but when most people think of the Braves starters they think
of the 4 big names and for a while last year it looked as if a case could be
made for replacing Avery with Mercker.
George
|
63.2646 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 22 1996 13:37 | 4 |
|
Define Most People.
|
63.2647 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jul 22 1996 13:46 | 3 |
| Oh no - the great "Most People" debate!
We're going to need a separate "definitions" note.
|
63.2648 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 22 1996 13:57 | 25 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2646 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>
> Define Most People.
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ bbzzzz BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ BBZZZZZ
*** SWAT ***
....
George
|
63.2649 | Ok Then... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 22 1996 14:00 | 3 |
|
Define Most Bees??
|
63.2650 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 22 1996 15:10 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2649 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>
> Define Most Bees??
Well there's "B", "b", be, ... bee, ... Bea, ..., ... what else?
George
|
63.2651 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 22 1996 15:28 | 8 |
|
Thats you George. Change it to some useless mumbo Jumbo when your
wrong.
Chap
|
63.2652 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 22 1996 16:10 | 25 |
|
Right Chap. I should admit I'm wrong, sorry about that.
As anyone can tell I was really off the mark. When ever anyone thinks of the
Braves Starting rotation the name of Kent Mercker jumps forth along with the
names of Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz and Avery. Why you hear about'em every day.
His name is burned into the memory of every kid south of the Mason Dixon line
and as we speak a bronze likeness of Mercker is being built to stand along side
the main entrance of the new Olympic Stadium. Ali himself imitated Mercker's
stance as he lit the Olympic torch and the key they gave Ali to the city is
only temporary, the real one being cast in gold to be presented to Kent Mercker
himself on the day inducted into the hall of fame.
For centuries to come everyone who even thinks of baseball as it was at the
end of the 20th century will automatically mouth the sounds, Maddux, Glavine,
Smoltz, Avery and Mercker and never again will anyone refer to the Braves
"starting four" who dominated hitters at Fulton County Stadium. For ever more
it will be the Starting Five and Mercker's name will live in immortality along
with the other great athletes who visited Atlanta.
Mathews ... Aaron ... Horner ... Murphy ... Maddux ... Kent Mercker ...
the Pretzel Boy!!!!!
George
|
63.2653 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jul 22 1996 16:43 | 9 |
| > As anyone can tell I was really off the mark. When ever anyone thinks of the
>Braves Starting rotation the name of Kent Mercker jumps forth along with the
>names of Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz and Avery.
Actually, George, when Mercker was pitching for the Braves, his name did
come to my mind when thinking about the Braves' rotation.
As for the wasted breath of the rest of your note, well, it's your air when
it's in your lungs - you can do what you want with it.
|
63.2654 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Jul 22 1996 16:48 | 17 |
|
Who said he was great?
You made the comment that he almost cracked Atlanta's staff.
Anyone who follows baseball closely knows that every team has got 5
starters. Last year for Atlanta they were Maddux,Glavine,Avery
,Smoltz and Mercker.
This year it has been the aforementioned four and Jason Schmidt.
Now especially if you like the team as much as you say you do, you
would have known that.
But then again with your knowledge of Baseball???
Cha
|
63.2655 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 22 1996 16:51 | 29 |
|
Several points to make:
1. Jamie Moyer is a stiff. Read that word again - STIFF! Boston will
be lucky to dump his salary for a second rate STIFF or third rate
prospect. The Indians weren't built by an idiot, like the Sox fans
like to think. Moyer is a stiff and he'll command stiff value in
return. If Cleveland trades for Moyer, who do they dump? Bartolo
Colon will be brought up as soon as he is healthy, so exactly which
pitcher does Cleveland drop?
2. The comments made last week about Cleveland needing that left handed
starter to get past the yankees are utter trash. I checked the stats
through last Wednesday, and while the yankees do have a better record
v.s. starting RHP than starting LHP, it is not significant.
3. Murray wore out his welcome in Cleveland when he was asked to play
1B with Franco hurt and he said "Why didn't you ask me if I could play
first before you signed Franco... BTW, my should hurts..." Your should
hurts this pal, go rot in Baltimore, they're done.
4. Mercker may not be a top notch starter, but Cleveland has had
very good luck turning guys like this around. Mercker is one of the
two pitchers the Indians had signed last year (along with Gordon -
thank god that didn't go through - Gordon is a bigger stiff than
Moyer).
|
63.2656 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jul 22 1996 18:11 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2654 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!!" >>>
> You made the comment that he almost cracked Atlanta's staff.
> Anyone who follows baseball closely knows that every team has got 5
> starters. Last year for Atlanta they were Maddux,Glavine,Avery
> ,Smoltz and Mercker.
Find anywhere where I said "he almost cracked Atlanta's staff".
George
|
63.2657 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jul 22 1996 18:16 | 5 |
|
Looks like the Tribe have determined that Julian Tavares is a
stiff, they sent him to AA Buffalo and activated Greg Swindell.
Ron
|
63.2658 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 23 1996 08:43 | 11 |
|
Ron, how are you? How are the Dead Sox doing? Oh, they suck... gee,
you must be trying to stir up the pot. Here's some food for thought
for next time you try to report news.
1. The Indians do not have anyone by the name of Julian Tavares on
their roster.
2. The Indians do not have a AA affiliate in Buffalo.
3. The Indians are in first place.
Hope this helps...
|
63.2659 | BREAKING/CRACKING.....ITS ALL EGGS TO ME | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Jul 23 1996 09:05 | 20 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2635 CLEVELAND INDIANS 2635 of 2654
CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" 14 lines 22-JUL-1996 10:20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mercker is really an enigma. After his no-hitter back in '94 there were
people seriously considering the possibility of him --->breaking into the Braves
starting rotation, probably the toughest place to land a pitching job in the
last few decades. However with Baltimore he's gone nowhere falling off last
year and racking up a 7+ ERA and giving up a home run every 5-6 innings so far
this season.
The question is, which Mercker will show up in Cleveland. He seems to be
on the decline and at best you'd have to say he's had little to no luck in
the American League.
Maybe the tribe is looking to steal pitching signals during the World Series.
George
|
63.2660 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 23 1996 09:06 | 2 |
|
Indians lead over ChiSox up to 5 games...
|
63.2661 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 23 1996 09:06 | 2 |
|
Yankmees choke away best record in AL.
|
63.2662 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jul 23 1996 10:45 | 18 |
|
re .2658,
So Groaner what your saying is that the Globe is wrong again?
Yesterdays, baseball transactions.
Cleveland (AL): Activated P Greg Swindell; optioned P Julian Tavarez
to Buffalo (AA). So I spelled Tavarez wrong, and Buffalo is AAA(?)
BFD.
I'm not stirring the pot anymore then you do. Yes, the Sox are
having a bad year and Cleveland is right where they are suppose to be,
in 1st place. The Sox are 10 games behind for the WC spot, which isn't
bad considering the bullpen has 14 blown saves. Plus, the sox are
something like 7-11 in extra inning games.
Ron
I'm not stirring the pot anymore then you do.
|
63.2663 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Almost Pigskin time!! | Tue Jul 23 1996 10:50 | 5 |
| Buffalo (AA)
(AA) stands for American Association which is a AAA league
Mike
|
63.2664 | Then again there's Texas to consider | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Jul 23 1996 11:18 | 10 |
| Groaner I thought you were the one intelligent enough to throw Joe
Huber's stats in the circular file. Let's cut to the quick. The third
game vs the Yankees at New York, Hershiser and Nagy produced a split.
Who pitches for Cleveland in game 3? You better have that answer by
7/31. Maybe Moyer's not the guy, surely Mercker's not unless he turns
around considerably.
You'd better find a lefthander and don't lie to me. I know, you know
that you need a leftie at NY. You simply are not that stupid.
|
63.2665 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 23 1996 11:42 | 28 |
| > Groaner I thought you were the one intelligent enough to throw Joe
> Huber's stats in the circular file.
Gee, thanks.
> Let's cut to the quick. The third
> game vs the Yankees at New York, Hershiser and Nagy produced a split.
> Who pitches for Cleveland in game 3?
Dennis Martinez.
> You better have that answer by
> 7/31. Maybe Moyer's not the guy, surely Mercker's not unless he turns
> around considerably.
Um - there's precious little evidence which suggests Moyer would
be a better choice than Mercker. Sure, Mercker's had a worse season
this year. But he's certainly got the more impressive carreer, and
it's not as if Moyer is even a former WS hero, or some such...
> You'd better find a lefthander and don't lie to me. I know, you know
> that you need a leftie at NY. You simply are not that stupid.
It would be nice to have a lefty; I don't think anyone has argued that.
But I'd far rather have a _good_ righty than some scrap heap lefty...
Now, if the Mariners decide to trade RJ...
Joe
|
63.2666 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Jul 23 1996 11:46 | 11 |
|
So Joe your giving up game 3? Dennis Martinez last beat the Yankees
in 1982.
Not that I'm saying either team is destined (sp) to get there. I
think Texas/Seattle/Chicago could knock off Cleveland too. :-)
chap
|
63.2667 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 23 1996 11:50 | 14 |
|
> So Joe your giving up game 3? Dennis Martinez last beat the Yankees
> in 1982.
Whoopie - he was in the NL most of that time. I believe he can beat
the Yankees.
> Not that I'm saying either team is destined (sp) to get there. I
> think Texas/Seattle/Chicago could knock off Cleveland too. :-)
I still see no reason to believe Cleveland won't most likely be in the
WS. However, given the nature of the playoffs, nothing's certain.
Joe
|
63.2668 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 23 1996 12:01 | 12 |
|
Martinez is waiting to beat the Yankees in the playoffs to really rub
it in. Any win before then would just be a waste of time.
Yes, I'd take a quality lefty starter. I think Swindell or Mercker
could possibly step forward and help. I'd rather have a top notch
lefty. Does that mean Cleveland *must* have a lefty to beat the
Yankees - NO!
NY will fade, trust me on this one. They are over using their
pitchers.
|
63.2669 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Jul 23 1996 13:04 | 7 |
| > NY will fade, trust me on this one. They are over using their
> pitchers.
You may have something here. Torre just may have a little Mauch in
him. Stubborn national league style manager who thinks pitchers always
baby themselves anyway and besides there's always another ragarm down
on the farm. I'd be worried about Petitte, I agree.
|
63.2670 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 23 1996 13:12 | 3 |
|
I'd worry about Gooden too. How many innings did he pitch last year?
|
63.2671 | And Tavarez needs to get straighten out | CSLALL::BRULE | Almost Pigskin time!! | Tue Jul 23 1996 14:48 | 5 |
| Paul, Joe,
How is Martinez coming along? When's he coming off the DL? If he
doesn't come back fully, that would leave a hole in the rotation.
Mike
|
63.2672 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Tue Jul 23 1996 15:37 | 4 |
|
word from the 'burgh is that Denny Neagle may be available for trade.
Im sure the Pirates would demand quite a bit for him though.
|
63.2673 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 23 1996 16:07 | 3 |
|
When is he a free agent?
|
63.2674 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jul 23 1996 17:42 | 2 |
| > that would leave a hole in the rotation.
^_nother
|
63.2675 | TICK...TICK...TICK...TICK... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Jul 25 1996 13:37 | 8 |
|
The Tribe take down Toronto last night 10-0! Up to 6 games over the
White Sox! Cleveland appears to be doing everything now since the
all-star break. Nice to see!
The Presidente gets the win!
W A H O O !
|
63.2676 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu Jul 25 1996 13:46 | 1 |
| It must have rained outside last night...
|
63.2677 | could be 15 games with martinez back... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jul 25 1996 14:58 | 4 |
|
Hal, they laughed when I said Cleveland would build a 10 game lead...
now those same people are in hiding... and they'll have excuses when
it happens.
|
63.2678 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jul 25 1996 15:31 | 2 |
| We do have an excuse. Thomas got injured right about that time. With
the pressure off Cleveland as usual started beating up on the peons.
|
63.2679 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jul 25 1996 15:44 | 6 |
|
Poor Frank Thomas, like Cleveland hasn't had injuries. I think its
safe to say that losing Julio Franco and Dennis Martinez for a month
or more, more than outweighs the loss of Frank Thomas.
Typical though, always an excuse...
|
63.2680 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jul 25 1996 16:22 | 7 |
| >losing Julio Franco and Dennis Martinez for a month
> or more, more than outweighs the loss of Frank Thomas.
Incredible. Is this coming from some esoteric stat file or simple Cleveland
fan bias. Two anybodies vs an all-time HoFer. Now if it had been
Belle and Lofton injured..
|
63.2681 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jul 25 1996 16:26 | 7 |
|
What else did I expect from Breen other than using some old adage. Go
look at the stats of thomas v.s. franco and throw in a #1 or #2 starter
to boot. The arguement is pointless, I knew you'd have an excuse and
you did... because you ain't main enough to admit the tribe will build
the 10 game lead.
|
63.2682 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jul 25 1996 16:29 | 12 |
|
At the point in the season prior to injury to either where they had
both played the same number of games...
Name Team BA RP HR SB G AB R H TB 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS E
----------------- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- --- --- --- --- --- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- -- --
1B Frank Thomas CWS 0.343 111 21 1 73 280 57 96 177 18 0 21 75 61 45 1 1 4
CI Julio Franco CLE 0.328 95 10 5 73 290 52 95 143 16 1 10 53 49 58 5 7 6
Martinez is 9-5. Sure looks like they offset fairly well to me. I
didn't say I wouldn't rather have Thomas, I said this year the impact
is the same.
|
63.2683 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Jul 25 1996 16:33 | 5 |
|
Chicago better watch out for those Red Sox, only 9 games back for
that Wild Card spot. :^)
Ron
|
63.2684 | Thomas is a dimension greater than likes of Franco | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jul 25 1996 17:47 | 17 |
| You have just demonstrated as well as I've ever seen how stats, no
matter how sophisticated they try to make them are totally misleading.
I'll try to explain:
When playing Chicago any team instructs their pitcher "Do not throw
such and such a pitch to Thomas ever, if behind in the count do not..,
do not...
When playing Cleveland "For Franco keep it down..."
Franco is a reasonably good hitter and will pick up stats because of
Belle and the rest (even more with a lineup following Thomas like in
'94) but there is only one Frank Thomas.
If you don't have stats to prove my point then it is I saying don't
waste my time unless you have proof. Meaning you can't and I can't
prove it but if you don't know it, see it or accept it then you're not
dealing with reality just fantasy baseball.
|
63.2685 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jul 25 1996 17:55 | 4 |
|
We're comparing Thomas v.s. Franco *AND* Martinez for this year,
right now... not comparing Thomas v.s. Franco (ONLY, long term).
|
63.2686 | No comparison | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jul 25 1996 18:22 | 15 |
|
> We're comparing Thomas v.s. Franco *AND* Martinez for this year,
> right now... not comparing Thomas v.s. Franco (ONLY, long term).
I'd still go with Thomas. As Thomas goes, so go the White Sox.
The Sox are hurting badly without him.
Cleveland can do without Franco indefinitely (his _expected_
performance over the time he missed is not that far above
replacement level), and while they need the Dennis Martinez
of last season, it's just not the same as losing an everyday
MVP-type like Frank Thomas.
glenn
|
63.2687 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jul 26 1996 00:29 | 7 |
|
Sorry Glenn, i disagree. Put Martinez as the #5 starter in the White
Sox rotation and they would not be hurting like they are. Bottom line
and key point, I said Cleveland would build the lead to 10 games and
some bozo indicated the ChiSox would pass Cleveland. Said bozo is
now in hiding and others are making excuses for the slide. Make any
excuse you want, Cleveland will have this race wrapped up Sept 1.
|
63.2688 | K A B O O M ! ! ! ! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Jul 26 1996 09:35 | 6 |
|
Albert puts two out of the park last night and breaks up another
double play after being hit. Excelent play! Nagy gets his 12th
win! Not sure what Chicago did last night...
W A H O O !
|
63.2689 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jul 26 1996 10:22 | 4 |
|
Hal, Chicago lost... Cleveland is now 7 games up... I'm expecting more
excuses today on the predicted 10 game lead... some people just don't
learn, they don't want to admit that the Indians are awesome!
|
63.2690 | | BSS::NEUZIL | | Fri Jul 26 1996 11:00 | 6 |
|
After Belle's two homers last night, he became the all time Cleveland
Indian home run hitter. Anyone know (or care) who he passed?
Kevin
|
63.2691 | Nobody really cares but....... | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Fri Jul 26 1996 11:21 | 1 |
| I don't really care but I'd guess Rocky Colavito.
|
63.2692 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 26 1996 11:21 | 4 |
|
Earl Averill.
Joe
|
63.2693 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jul 26 1996 11:29 | 2 |
|
I'd go with Averill or Boudreau
|
63.2694 | The Ohioans speak | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Fri Jul 26 1996 11:34 | 1 |
| Yeah but do you guys really care?
|
63.2695 | A L B E R T B E L L E | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Jul 26 1996 11:44 | 8 |
|
TICK...
TICK...
TICK...
T I C K !!!
|
63.2696 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Jul 26 1996 11:55 | 15 |
| | -< A L B E R T B E L L E >-
|
|
| TICK...
| TICK...
| TICK...
|
|
|
| T I C K !!!
Yeah, we're all wondering when Joey is going to explode again in another
voilent outburst too....
|
63.2697 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri Jul 26 1996 12:16 | 13 |
| | -< A L B E R T B E L L E >-
|
|
| TICK...
| TICK...
| TICK...
|
|
|
| T I C K !!!
He really shouldn't go out in the woods in short pants...
|
63.2698 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 26 1996 12:21 | 8 |
|
> Yeah but do you guys really care?
Yes.
And, just to clarify, Averill was not a guess, but the correct answer.
Joe
|
63.2699 | you guys are getting him mad now | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Jul 26 1996 14:12 | 6 |
| >> And, just to clarify, Averill was not a guess, but the correct answer.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^
geez who wizzed in your wheaties?
;^)
|
63.2700 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 26 1996 14:14 | 8 |
|
???
What makes you think I was upset? I was just clarifying (since
guesses were made after I posted the answer) that my answer was
not, in fact, a guess, but the correct answer...
Joe
|
63.2701 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri Jul 26 1996 14:20 | 4 |
| It came off as a little self-righteous.
Of course, how that could happen in the context of this notes file is
totally beyond me... :-)
|
63.2702 | because they doubted you..... | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Jul 26 1996 14:26 | 4 |
|
Clarify's an awfully strong word for you to use.....
;^)
|
63.2703 | TICK...TICK...TICK...TICK... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Jul 26 1996 16:03 | 6 |
|
Albert Belle is just a good hard nosed baseball player! I'd take
him on my team anyday!
The Chief,
WAHOO!
|
63.2704 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jul 26 1996 16:16 | 4 |
|
Hal, he is on your team. Doesn't Bruce Tower remind you of Albert a
little, except Albert still has power, and other than his dominating
days in B and C division, has Tower ever had power?
|
63.2705 | | AWECIM::RUSSO | claimin! | Fri Jul 26 1996 16:51 | 6 |
|
Wow, ragging on teamates.....you'd never see me ragging on a teamate,
like say Glenn "Out trying to stretch a cheap hit single into a double"
Waugaman ;^)
Dave
|
63.2706 | "Ping" | STRATA::BTOWER | | Fri Jul 26 1996 16:57 | 4 |
| Yes, I am like Albert in that I could SNAP at any moment. I keep having
these voice's tell me to implant TPS into the forehead of a blond
headed clevelanite. 8>). But I am taking my medicine on a regular
basis. (today anyway).
|
63.2707 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jul 26 1996 18:02 | 3 |
|
Don't bust up that TPS pal, that's my chance to go deep this year...
that one at Stow should have been out!
|
63.2708 | I did this once and Glenn ragged me when I told him | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Fri Jul 26 1996 18:22 | 17 |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 63.2705 CLEVELAND INDIANS
2705 of 2707
AWECIM::RUSSO "claimin!" 6 lines
26-JUL-1996 15:51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow, ragging on teamates.....you'd never see me ragging on a
teamate,
like say Glenn "Out trying to stretch a cheap hit single into a
double"
Waugaman ;^)
Dave
End of note
I didn't hear about this one. Did he slide?
|
63.2709 | :-) | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Sat Jul 27 1996 12:29 | 2 |
|
Glenn's too short to play softball.
|
63.2710 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Sun Jul 28 1996 08:39 | 3 |
|
Height means nothing.
|
63.2711 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Mon Jul 29 1996 13:24 | 4 |
| re a few back about Denny Neagle.
Neagle is signed through next year.
|
63.2712 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 29 1996 14:41 | 4 |
|
Heath has zero jacks this year.
Glenn is ascared to play in DMSL.
|
63.2713 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Jul 29 1996 14:49 | 10 |
|
> Glenn is ascared to play in DMSL.
My arm's dead, I'm too short, I'm ascared to play in the DMSL (even
though I live in backwoods NH)... where you getting your scouting
reports Groaner?
glenn
|
63.2714 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jul 29 1996 15:02 | 6 |
|
I didn't say your arm was dead... all I know is, when I look at eye
level parallel to the ground (seeing nothing below eye level), I
can't see you or George Brooks = too short.
Maybe is was DrM who told me you were ascared to play in DMSL.
|
63.2715 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 30 1996 08:22 | 5 |
|
I'm completely baffled. Hope Hart knows what the heck he's doing...
trading talent for talent is one thing, but there are humans and
individuals involved. Baerga was a large part of the Tribe's heart.
Cleveland better sign Knoblauch at the end of the year now.
|
63.2716 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 30 1996 09:22 | 12 |
|
Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.
Even if you _want_ Kent (and having a good RH hitter isn't a bad
thing - but there's _no_ reason to prefer a 3B - that's not the
problem vs. lefties), there's no reason to give up Baerga to get
him. If the Indians put Kent at 2B and let Vizciano rot on the
bench, they won't have hurt themselves _too_ badly talent-wise.
Baerga is overrated (he never walks), but was still a major part
of Cleveland's future.
Joe
|
63.2717 | Personally, I'd BLAM the media... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jul 30 1996 10:33 | 11 |
|
Trading Baerga comes as a complete shock to me. Did anyone see
this coming? I'm waiting for the for the other shoe to drop here.
It has to be related to Baerga's bad-attitude rep, which by my
guess means that Hargrove wanted Baerga out.
The Red Sox need Knoblauch, bad. For the money involved I'd rather
have Knoblauch than Alomar...
glenn
|
63.2718 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jul 30 1996 11:16 | 9 |
|
F the Indians.
Only way I feel any better is if Knoblauch shows up in Cleveland later
this week. Everyone knows Hart covets Knoblauch, and Chuck would fit
perfectly into the line-up... wants to stay in Minnesota, but I'm
sure would rather be in CLE for a winner than BOS with the other
losers.
|
63.2719 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jul 30 1996 12:11 | 6 |
|
The Indians don't need Knoblauch... they've got Vizcaino...
glenn
|
63.2720 | Hart Panicked | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Jul 30 1996 14:20 | 22 |
| The time to judge a GM is when everything isn't turning up roses (ie: last
year for Cle). I think Hart is panicking. There were rumors that Baerga
was going to Florida for Sheffield. There were reports that Cleveland
thinks his hitting isn't the same this year. But beware of momentary
changes in performance (eg: Wade Boggs' last year in Boston). This kid
can hit, and he produces runs...and will continue to do both for a long
time.
Kent and Vizciano don't equal Carlos Baerga...and that's before you
consider the intangibles. The Mets' asst GM was on WFAN last night
and after they calmed him down from his almost giddy jubilation, he
said that Kent wasn't hitting, especially not with runners in scoring
position. He said he's never been the player they thought they were
getting. He then said this was a "NO-BRAINER". When GMs use this
term they're saying that they couldn't say "YES" fast enough, and
couldn't believe what they were being offered.
Cleveland isn't as dominant as last year, but they're going to be
in the post-season any way. Do they honestly think that 1-HR Vizciano
and utilityman Kent are more important to their chances than Baerga ???
As Baerga put it, "it would be different if they had acquired a quality
pitcher, 'cause that's what we need".
|
63.2721 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Tue Jul 30 1996 14:26 | 7 |
| <<< Note 63.2720 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
-< Hart Panicked >-
>As Baerga put it, "it would be different if they had acquired a quality
>pitcher, 'cause that's what we need".
Like Mark Clark....
|
63.2722 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 30 1996 14:30 | 20 |
|
Joe,
>The time to judge a GM is when everything isn't turning up roses (ie: last
>year for Cle). I think Hart is panicking.
The odd thing is that there was no indication of panic before this.
The Poole for Carreon move, followed by the release of Leius, was
clearly positive. Giving Murray's playing time to Burnitz and
Giles was certainly a move in the right direction. If the Indians
trade for Knoblauch now, this move is only illogical; the only
rational explanation I can think of is that:
1) Hart's got a deal set for Knoblauch, and
2) Hart didn't feel Baerga could be benched.
Even so, Baerga's worth more than Kent and Vizcaino. A trade for
Kent and Alfonzo I could have lived with a bit easier...
Joe
|
63.2723 | Yankee preperation? | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | Soar with the Eagles! | Tue Jul 30 1996 16:05 | 14 |
| The analysts on ESPN's Baseball Tonight claimed the Indians feel
that Baerga has lost a lot of speed, both in the infield and
at bat ... they claim he isn't getting to balls that he used to
get to and that he has broken more than 90 bats this season
(twice the number anyone else on the team has broken) which is
a sign of poor bat speed ... they also claimed that the Indians
were not happy with his reporting to training camp over weight ...
Carlos on the other hand, vowed to return to Cleveland next year
in a Mets uniform when the All-Star game is played there ...
And he was right, the Indians need pitching, not offense ...
Vinny
|
63.2724 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jul 30 1996 16:45 | 14 |
|
Vinny,
> And he was right, the Indians need pitching, not offense ...
The indians are third in the league in runs scored, and third in ERA.
While a single, top-notch _pitcher_ would be the most valuable
addition, _pitching_ in general is no more of a need than hitting.
And there's no particular reason to believe that the Baerga trade
will in any way improve the hitting vs. lefties; in 1995, Kent hit
.248 vs. lefties (.306 OBP, .376 SLG).
Joe
|
63.2725 | I don't see their logic. | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed Jul 31 1996 08:22 | 7 |
| This kind of trade could do more damage to "team chemistry" more than
anything else. Baerga, as management said had been there from the
beginning of the Indian transformation into a high quality team in the
early 90's. They should have waited till the end of the year to dump
Carlos if they were not happy with him. They have a big enough lead
in the division, I don't understand needing these two guys instead
of Baerga at all. I think it's gonna backfire on em bigtime.
|
63.2726 | tick tick tick TICK! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Aug 01 1996 11:42 | 23 |
|
Bottom of the 9th....bases loaded....two out.....down 2-0.......
up comes Albert Belle......
TICK
TICK
TICK
TICK
K A B O O M ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Grand Slam! Gave over! Tribe wins...4-2!
W A H O O O O O O O O O O!
|
63.2727 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Aug 01 1996 12:43 | 2 |
|
Baboom
|
63.2728 | One hell of a catch. | STRATA::BTOWER | | Mon Aug 05 1996 14:50 | 2 |
| "HOW ABOUT THAT" catch by Kenny Lofton yesterday. One of the best I've
seen in a long long time.
|
63.2729 | one question... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Aug 06 1996 09:36 | 6 |
|
...how come Hal doesn't enter a "TICK... TICK... TICK..." note when Greg
Swindell enters a ballgame?
It's readily apparent that he is not an answer to filling any kind of slot
in their pitching staff.
|
63.2730 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Aug 06 1996 10:44 | 5 |
|
No doubt. Hopefully John Hart hasn't gone completely daft, though,
and will give Swindell the boot at the next convenient opportunity.
Joe
|
63.2731 | Indians should have grabbed Moyer | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Aug 06 1996 11:04 | 6 |
| Joe, Roland, Paul... didn't Cleveland have someone in the organization
the equal or greater than Darren Bragg? Or does Hart figure to do
better than Jamie Moyer via a waiver deal.
re. All these players currently clearing waivers.. when a deal is made
can it still be blocked by a lower ranking club?
|
63.2732 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Aug 06 1996 11:10 | 3 |
| I thought that if a player cleared waivers, the deal couldn't be blocked.
But, as we know, I am occasionally wrong... :-)
|
63.2733 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Aug 06 1996 12:20 | 11 |
|
Sure, Cleveland has Brian Giles, who isn't terribly different from
Darren Bragg, and Jeromy Burnitz, who is also roughly the same player.
I'd rather have any of them than Moyer...
w.r.t. waivers - once a player has _cleared_ waivers, deals can be
made. If a team trys to grab the player as part of a deal, a lower
ranking club can block them.
Joe
|
63.2734 | Come to think of it maybe it is #2 | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Aug 07 1996 12:21 | 19 |
| Bragg was obviously better for the Redsox than Moyer. To win important
games in the postseason (or in Cleveland's case, down the stretch I
fear) Moyer might be the right guy.
re.
> w.r.t. waivers - once a player has _cleared_ waivers, deals can be
> made. If a team trys to grab the player as part of a deal, a lower
> ranking club can block them.
Waiver clearing is in process right now I believe, Duquette says he put
a bunch of sox on waivers, surely including Greenwell. If the Whitesox
wanted to block Cleveland from dealing for Greenwell do they have to do
it now in anticipation of the deal or later. I'm guessing they have to
block before the waiver period is over without knowing about any deal.
Or are you saying that if a deal is concluded after this waiver period
a Cleveland puts a claim in for Greenwell then the pale hose can claim
Greenie first?
|
63.2735 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Aug 07 1996 12:30 | 22 |
|
> Waiver clearing is in process right now I believe, Duquette says he put
> a bunch of sox on waivers, surely including Greenwell. If the Whitesox
> wanted to block Cleveland from dealing for Greenwell do they have to do
> it now in anticipation of the deal or later. I'm guessing they have to
> block before the waiver period is over without knowing about any deal.
>
> Or are you saying that if a deal is concluded after this waiver period
> a Cleveland puts a claim in for Greenwell then the pale hose can claim
> Greenie first?
Not quite...
Deals can be accomplished one of two ways:
1) Player G is put on waivers. If no one claims him, he can be traded
without difficulty.
2) Player G is put on waivers, and the team he's being traded to
claims him. A lower ranking team can then pull rank.
Joe
|
63.2736 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Aug 07 1996 12:41 | 6 |
| Typically a team puts almost all of their players on waivers during this
period, then pulls back those that get claimed and they don't want to lose.
If someone clears waivers, they can be traded at anytime without having
to go thru the waiver process again. If someone was claimed and pulled
back, I believe they have to go thru waivers again if the club wants to
trade that player later. True ?
|
63.2737 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Aug 07 1996 12:46 | 2 |
|
True.
|
63.2738 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Aug 08 1996 11:41 | 14 |
|
> No doubt. Hopefully John Hart hasn't gone completely daft, though,
> and will give Swindell the boot at the next convenient opportunity.
Based on that ESPN report that aired yesterday, reading between
the lines it seemed pretty clear that Hart and the Indians thought
that Baerga was doing too much partying. Of course at the surface
both Hargrove and Hart claim that this was baseball-interests-only
trade, but then they turn around and use loaded comments like
misplaced priorities, not getting enough sleep, sending a wake-up
call, etc.
glenn
|
63.2739 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu Aug 08 1996 12:02 | 4 |
| >not getting enough sleep, sending a wake-up
>call, etc
yeah, these two don't really go together that well...
|
63.2740 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu Aug 08 1996 12:06 | 11 |
| More on the "why not pick up Moyer instead of Swindell" front:
Moyer pitched a nice game against the Tribe last night, gave up
only two runs, I believe was positioned to pick up the win, but
had the bullpen give up 3 in the ninth.
Jamie Moyer is not a savior, but he doesn't have nearly as many fork
marks as Swindell.
I think Hart is doing a good job, but finding that it's easier to make a bad
team good than to make a good team better.
|
63.2741 | Albert needs it! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Aug 12 1996 17:05 | 16 |
|
TICK
TICK
TICK
TICK
TICK
TICK
TICK
|
63.2742 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Aug 12 1996 17:57 | 3 |
|
KABOOM!
|
63.2743 | Lets try it again... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Aug 13 1996 16:37 | 19 |
|
Well, Albert did it up yesterday...not the big one but a big
bases loaded single that put the Tribe up to stay! Indians win
5-4 with Oral getting his 12th win of the season.
TICK
T I C K
T I C K
T I C K
T I C K
The Chief,
WAHOOOOOOOOOOO!
|
63.2744 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Wed Aug 14 1996 07:33 | 3 |
|
Orel Hal Orel
|
63.2745 | TICK...TICK...TICK...TICK...TICK... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Aug 14 1996 12:12 | 13 |
|
K A B O O M ! ! !
Albert hits his 39th homer of the season...a solo shot in a loosing
cause against the Angles....
WAHOOOOOOO!
|
63.2746 | Numbers hanger | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Wed Aug 14 1996 12:20 | 4 |
|
>> ...a solo shot in a loosing cause
Standard Albert.
|
63.2747 | no clue, media opinion is his opinion | LIFT::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Aug 14 1996 12:42 | 4 |
|
>> Standard Albert.
Standard Brydie
|
63.2748 | But as Lofton goes, so goes... | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Aug 14 1996 14:27 | 11 |
| You might have mentioned Albert's game-saving catch in the same game.
That's a little above and beyond the standard Albert.
I'll have to give a little grudging credit to Hargrove for keeping that
bunch together this year. Each has had his little slumps but
rebounded.
And since I've gone this far, a little credit to Joe Huber for pointing
out Thome as being a lot better than anyone, including his own coaches,
thinks.
|
63.2749 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Aug 14 1996 18:56 | 2 |
|
Joe isn't the only one who's been pushing for Thome.
|
63.2750 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Aug 27 1996 11:16 | 3 |
|
Lead now at 9 games, where are the bozos who said 10 games was out of
the question?
|
63.2751 | | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Profit millions,lose job | Wed Aug 28 1996 00:16 | 8 |
| Groaner,
Where are all those predictions you made about Black Jack between
.1800 and .1900?
There sure are alot of deleted notes in that span...
Tim
|
63.2752 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Aug 28 1996 10:51 | 2 |
|
Tribe 10 games up, 'nuff said losers.
|
63.2753 | TICK, TICK, T I C K, T I C K, T I C K ! ! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Aug 28 1996 11:55 | 11 |
|
Albert and Thome both smack big ones last night...#42 for Belle!!!
Dennis looks to be out for the season...only went 2/3 of an inning.
Bring on the Sox!!!
The Chief,
WAHOO!
|
63.2754 | get off the drugs, things may be clearer | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Aug 28 1996 12:01 | 11 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2677 CLEVELAND INDIANS 2677 of 2753
ROCK::GRONOWSKI 4 lines 25-JUL-1996 13:58
-< could be 15 games with martinez back... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hal, they laughed when I said Cleveland would build a 10 game lead...
now those same people are in hiding... and they'll have excuses when
it happens.
|
63.2755 | 10 1/2 game lead | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Aug 28 1996 17:06 | 3 |
|
Another HR and 4 more RBI for Belle today (and the game's not over
yet).
|
63.2756 | KKKKAAAAABBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Aug 28 1996 17:26 | 5 |
|
and.....the score!!!!!
W A H O O O O O O ! ! ! ! ! !
|
63.2757 | 9-3 final | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Aug 28 1996 17:55 | 2 |
|
It was like a hundred to nothing.
|
63.2758 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Aug 28 1996 17:57 | 7 |
|
When is the last time a team had 3 guys with more than 100 RBI?
Belle has 129 - Leads league (MO WHO?)
Thome has 94
Ramirez has 95
|
63.2759 | Try and keep up, Groaner... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Aug 28 1996 18:08 | 8 |
|
> When is the last time a team had 3 guys with more than 100 RBI?
Colorado Rockies, couple of weeks ago, now working on 4...
glenn
|
63.2760 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Aug 28 1996 18:13 | 3 |
| re .2755,
What do you expect when your playing Detroit? :^)
|
63.2761 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Wed Aug 28 1996 19:58 | 2 |
| ...and the those who have kept up, the Rockies are working on the
record of the 1929? Yankmes.
|
63.2762 | Fess up | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Profit millions,lose job | Wed Aug 28 1996 20:19 | 6 |
| Whats a matter Groaner, embarresed to admit you made a wrong
prediction about Black Jack?
I knew I should have extracted those predicitons!
Tim
|
63.2763 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Aug 29 1996 09:20 | 3 |
|
Seattle Does have 3 guys over 100 RBI?
|
63.2764 | Thome gets another one too... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Aug 29 1996 13:36 | 29 |
|
Now, did I predict this one or what????
Mean Albert does it again.....43 and counting!
The Chief,
WAHOO!
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 63.2753 CLEVELAND INDIANS 2753 of 2763
SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR "Central Division Champs=Indians" 11 lines 28-AUG-1996 10:55
-< TICK, TICK, T I C K, T I C K, T I C K ! ! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Albert and Thome both smack big ones last night...#42 for Belle!!!
Dennis looks to be out for the season...only went 2/3 of an inning.
Bring on the Sox!!!
The Chief,
WAHOO!
|
63.2765 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Aug 29 1996 13:55 | 3 |
|
Baboom..
|
63.2766 | UNTOUCHABLE | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | "Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof" | Fri Aug 30 1996 01:37 | 7 |
| Hate to tell you guys, but you're not going to be able to touch the
Braves. With Neagle added to the already best pitching squad in
baseball, and the emergence of their young outfielder, the only
-TICK-TICK-TICK- is the countdown until the Indians are swept out of the
World Series.
Rich......
|
63.2767 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Aug 30 1996 10:50 | 4 |
|
Oh, okay... Rich says the Braves are a lock. Hey pal, why not sell
your house and go to Vegas... put your money where your mouth is...
probably just another frustrated Sox fan in high heels.
|
63.2768 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Fri Aug 30 1996 12:43 | 5 |
|
Maybe he could make a p-name bet with you. Oh wait, what am I talking
about......you'd welch on it.
Claybone
|
63.2769 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Aug 30 1996 13:49 | 2 |
|
I followed the letter of the wager exactly.
|
63.2770 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Fri Aug 30 1996 15:09 | 4 |
|
"I am not a crook."
- Richard Milhouse Gronowski
|
63.2771 | | VMSNET::MCGONIGAL | | Fri Aug 30 1996 23:26 | 13 |
| > <<< Note 63.1863 by ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R >>>
>
>> All I have to say is... when the season is over and Black Jack
>> is sporting his 23-6 record and in the running for the Cy Young...
>> three words... "told you so!"
>
>
> If this happens, I'll be in the crow note. OTOH, If (as is more likely)
> he is 13 or 14 wins and 11 defeats, I'm sure you'll have made yourself
> scarce.
Or maybe make his notes scarce. Coward.
|
63.2772 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Sep 02 1996 23:09 | 2 |
|
I love all these read-only ladies.
|
63.2773 | Talk about Lame promises????????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Sep 03 1996 10:17 | 11 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 7.1661 The American League (Baseball) 1661 of 1663
ROCK::GRONOWSKI 4 lines 3-MAY-1996 14:03
-< no team in the AL is close. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If they Braves get to the WS this year, we'll see just how good or bad
they'll do against the Tribe. Cleveland is a lock for the WS again
this year.
|
63.2774 | | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Onlysayingwhatsonmymind | Tue Sep 03 1996 19:24 | 8 |
| The name slinging is Pauls only out when you look at .2771. It looks
like someone has saved your predictions.
Atlanta is the team to beat in the NL. The tribe is arguably the
team in the AL to beat. Do you think if the said teams meet in the WS,
the tribe will beat the braves? Maybe, but a VERY slim chance of it.
Tim
|
63.2775 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Sep 04 1996 15:11 | 3 |
|
Both teams have to get there before we will find out. Is Atlanta a
better team? Right now, probably so. Will they repeat? Unknown.
|
63.2776 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Sep 04 1996 15:27 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 63.2775 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> Both teams have to get there before we will find out. Is Atlanta a
> better team? Right now, probably so. Will they repeat? Unknown.
Well, not RIGHT now. The Braves have lost 7 of their last 10 including
several to the Cubies. They seem to be in a slump.
Better to get it over with now and heat up in time for the playoffs.
George
|
63.2777 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Sep 05 1996 13:40 | 12 |
|
Cleveland has not peaked yet this year. The addition of Seitzer is
huge. Getting Franco back is huge. Thome is having a great season and
so is Belle. They need the pitching to get rolling... but they only
really need 3 starters in the playoffs and a spot 4th. Nagy has been
huge all year, Ogea is really coming on... Hershiser is there... so one
of McDowell or Martinez need to get their act together and Mesa needs
to peak.
Cleveland will be tough to beat in the playoffs. Despite what chappy
thinks. The Yackmees, if they make it, will have burnt out their
rotation.
|
63.2778 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Sep 05 1996 16:21 | 3 |
|
Yeah Cone will be real burnt out!!
|
63.2779 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Sep 05 1996 16:59 | 4 |
| You're going to elect to go the playoffs and world series without a
left-handed starter again. Oh well, good luck; last year you told me
you knew what you were doing. You do have Anderson, how's he look to
face the Yankees,RedSox(In Dreams I Walk...),Seattle?
|
63.2780 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Sep 05 1996 18:29 | 12 |
|
No lefty starter is needed. If they could have gotten one, that is
great, but they don't need one.
As for Cone, lets see a couple of more games. Gee would i be crushed
if he went down again... but it doesn't matter. With Wetteland out,
Rivera is getting used up. Gooden is done.
Lots of shooting the mouth off from someone who is ascared to bet
better record as season's end... and don't look in the rear view
mirror, but you've choked away 8 games of a 12 game lead... with a
big series against the O's and Sox coming up.
|
63.2781 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Fri Sep 06 1996 09:43 | 8 |
| >> No lefty starter is needed. If they could have gotten one, that is
>> great, but they don't need one.
I'm still surprised they did not get Neagle. Reports in Pittsburgh
prior to his trade had him going to Cleveland for 2 highly rated
prospects and an established (non-starter) player. He would of been a
great boost for the Indian's pitching staff - now he is the 4th starter
for the Braves pitching staff.
|
63.2782 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Sep 06 1996 09:49 | 5 |
|
According to Hart, the Indians offer was Branyan, Graves, Wright,
and Wilson, which is, IMHO, at least as good as the Braves offer...
Joe
|
63.2783 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | The Steelers really need Scott Zolak | Fri Sep 06 1996 09:56 | 10 |
|
> According to Hart, the Indians offer was Branyan, Graves, Wright,
> and Wilson, which is, IMHO, at least as good as the Braves offer...
So much for the theory that teams just will no longer trade topnotch
prospects for stretch-drive acquisitions. As I recall, both Graves
and Wright were "untouchable".
glenn
|
63.2784 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Sep 06 1996 11:06 | 3 |
|
Don't bet with welchers!!
|
63.2785 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Sep 06 1996 12:23 | 3 |
|
Neagle isn't exactly Doyle Alexander. If you're getting someone for
the drive and the future, you can afford to give up top prospects.
|
63.2786 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri Sep 06 1996 12:58 | 3 |
| > Neagle isn't exactly Doyle Alexander.
For one thing, he's probably a nicer guy...
|
63.2787 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Fri Sep 06 1996 14:36 | 8 |
| What is Cleveland going to do with Seitzer, switch him with Thome
(3b<->dh)? They should have grabbed Moyer but I'm glad the Sox got
Bragg. I'm beginning to become more of a Belle fan from at least a
pure baseball point of view. He got totally shafted in the Vina
incident. I wonder if he's learning not to be the outspoken guy about
media outrageous, intrusive behavior.
Baerga trade hasn't seemed to hurt them. What's Kent doing?
|
63.2788 | Interesting reading......:-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Sep 06 1996 16:28 | 163 |
| <<< HUMANE::DISK$SCSI:[NOTES$LIBRARY]BASEBALL.NOTE;2 >>>
-< Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 30.805 The Cleveland Indians Note 805 of 805
ALFSS2::TAYLOR_D "and run those fat tackles 2 deat" 156 lines 6-SEP-1996 14:48
-< Hand-wringing >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gleaned this from the Akron Beacon-Journal website. For good daily
Tribe coverage, this is the place to go on the 'net.
http://www.ohio.com/bj/sports/indians/index.html
Beacon Journal Extra: Sports Story
Tribe poised for quick exit
A plethera of problems surrounds the team as it approaches
post-season
BY SHELDON OCKER
Beacon Journal sports writer
September 6, 1996
The Indians' seven-game lead over the White Sox notwithstanding, a
Tribe return to the World Series looks iffy at best.
Moreover, there are substantive reasons to rate Cleveland's
chances as bleak for earning a rematch with the Braves, the likely
winners of the National League pennant.
The Indians' rotation is in disarray. They haven't been winning at
home. Probable playoff opponents Texas and New York have walked all
over them. The offense has a maddening tendency to hibernate with
runners in scoring position, and Cleveland's fundamentals are
fundamentally second rate.
Yet Manager Mike Hargrove said, "Since the All-Star break, I
think we've played pretty good baseball."
Keep in mind that part of Hargrove's job is to keep the
competitive fires burning within the hearts of his troops. The odds
that Hargrove will make negative projections about his team are the
same as the odds that Casey Candaele will lead the American League
in home runs.
That's the way the manager is supposed to look at his world.
Nevertheless, within this context, Hargrove knows not all is rosy.
The facts are these. Since May 26, the Indians are 49-43. Since June
20, they are 14-17 at their beloved Jacobs Field. Since the All-Star
break, they are 30-22. Since Aug. 9, they are 5-12 against every
team except the Tigers.
In other words, it's difficult to conjure up a won-loss statistic
that makes the Tribe look good.
"We see our club every day, so things we don't like really look
ugly," Hargrove said. "But things are just as ugly on other teams."
In other words, the more powerful the magnifying glass, the more
flaws are likely to come into view.
But that wasn't true last year, and maybe that's part of the problem.
The public and the media probably were spoiled by the Indians' 1995
record of 100-44 and 30-game lead over second-place Kansas City.
"People compare last year to this year, and there is no
comparison," Hargrove said. "Everything that could go right did
go right. This year is more normal from that standpoint. We got
all the breaks last season."
That said, Hargrove isn't unaware of the team's problems,
especially the uncertainties surrounding the rotation.
Dennis Martinez is on the disabled list. Nobody knows if he can
pitch again this season, or ever.
And if he says he's ready, there is little time to put him to
the test before the final playoff roster is set.
Then there's Jack McDowell, who has made five consecutive subpar
starts. McDowell swears he isn't hurt, but neither he nor the
Tribe coaching staff has been able to isolate his problem.
"The rotation is the main concern right now," Hargrove said. "We
need to have Jack throwing the ball the way he can. And Albie Lopez
not lasting through the fifth inning the other day is a big concern.
"But Orel (Hershiser), Charlie (Nagy) and Chad (Ogea) are pitching
well, and we still have three weeks to settle in."
Lopez is the lesser issue unless both Martinez and McDowell remain
unproductive.
In his last start against the Brewers, Lopez was sailing along with
a lead until the fifth inning, when a bloop single and three walks
led to his departure.
McDowell's dilemma has evaded a solution so far.
"Jack is not a mechanics guy," Hargrove said. "He doesn't pay
too much attention to mechanics. He's been that way from Day 1.
But there are some things that we've picked up on."
One thing that stands in stark contrast to last year is
Cleveland's injury situation.
In 1995, the Tribe stayed exceptionally healthy. Hershiser
missed a couple of weeks early, and Eddie Murray missed a month.
Spring training 1996 had hardly begun when Omar Vizquel hurt his
shoulder. Though he continues to play every day, there is no
question that the injury has contributed to his team-leading
error total of 18.
In addition, Julio Franco was plagued for two months by a
hamstring pull; Martinez is making his second appearance on the
disabled list with a sore elbow, and Mark Carreon has been
sidelined for more than a week with a deep bruise to his shin.
Cleveland's depth suffered when Herbert Perry underwent knee
surgery more than two months ago. Though he was playing for
Triple-A Buffalo, Perry was the first option if the Indians
needed a first baseman. And they did when Franco went down.
It is difficult to measure the impact of the Tribe's inability
to execute basic plays on offense and defense. But anyone who
has watched the team knows it has made a significant difference.
"Any time you have a team with a lot of talented people, they have
the confidence to make things happen," Hargrove said. "They have a
tendency to do too much -- to throw a runner out when common sense
tells them that they can't, or try to take an extra base when the
opportunity isn't there."
The Indians also have been victimized by poor play in the outfield.
Albert Belle, Kenny Lofton and Manny Ramirez have combined for 26
errors. All three are among the league's top six outfielders in
errors.
"I don't know what to attribute that to," Hargrove said. "Except
sometimes players try to do too much."
Hargrove also believes the Indians have had problems coping with
distractions that were absent a year ago.
Belle's run-ins with photographers, rival second basemen and
TV cameramen are the most obvious. Also, the trades of Eddie
Murray and Carlos Baerga seemed to have a disruptive effect, at
least in the short term.
"We've had a lot more distractions this year, both internally and
externally," Hargrove said.
Considering everything that might go wrong, Hargrove remains
optimistic. Yet even he concedes that a quick exit from the
playoffs is more than possible.
"That's in the back of every manager's mind," he said. "If an
opposing team gets hot, bad things can happen."
|
63.2789 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Sep 06 1996 17:06 | 12 |
|
Yeah, Sheldon Ocker is IMHO the best writer covering the Indians.
I don't share all of Ocker's concerns, but do agree with some of them.
IMHO, a playoff rotation of Nagy-Hershiser-Ogea will be fine.
The hitting concerns me more; Vizciano stinks, and Alomar hasn't
been nearly as good as he was last year. OTOH, Vizquel's had a
great year with the bat, Belle, Ramirez, Lofton, and particularly
Thome are excellent hitters; the bench is _much_ stronger than last
year, which will also help.
Joe
|
63.2790 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Sep 06 1996 17:16 | 7 |
|
Yabuut Cleveland will use Nagy/Hershiser/McDowell.
Chap
|
63.2791 | | NQOS01::nqsrv109.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Sat Sep 07 1996 01:04 | 5 |
|
> I love all these read-only ladies.
Almost as bad as low life scumbags who write something embarassing and then
delete the note.
|
63.2792 | Is that a kaboom;-) | MFGFIN::JACKSON | The time is near | Sat Sep 07 1996 01:41 | 1 |
|
|
63.2793 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Sep 09 1996 09:56 | 6 |
|
Not as bad as the people who note from annonymous accounts in direct
violation of DEC policy because they are ascared to note from their own
account.
|
63.2794 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Sep 09 1996 10:51 | 2 |
|
What happened to that 10+ game lead?
|
63.2795 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Mon Sep 09 1996 12:12 | 1 |
| What anonymous account? I know who that was.
|
63.2796 | | NQOS01::nqsrv229.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Sep 09 1996 13:39 | 7 |
|
It was me groaner. Since I've moved to teamlinks/win95 I have no control over
what goes into the author space. I'll try to remember to sign my name nexted
time. Maybe Mike H. can give you some techweenie instructions though, he
seemed to be able to figure it out.
brews
|
63.2797 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Sep 09 1996 13:44 | 1 |
| I'm sure that if Brews was involved, it was just a_innocent college prank.
|
63.2798 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Mon Sep 09 1996 14:08 | 1 |
| You have to be smarter than a computer to figure it out.
|
63.2799 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Sep 09 1996 14:28 | 5 |
|
Lets see... corporate noting policy broken... moderators reply
"it was just a_innocent college prank", got it. Since I know
everything is done consistently, that means anything goes. Thanks
for the blank check.
|
63.2800 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Sep 09 1996 14:29 | 5 |
|
Ron the man is back out of his hole now that the Sox are making a run
for the playoffs. Too bad they'll choke and disappoint again.
Actually, i'm rooting for the Sox again, so I can get my freebie
tickets to the playoffs.
|
63.2801 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Sep 09 1996 14:33 | 33 |
| >
> Lets see... corporate noting policy broken... moderators reply
> "it was just a_innocent college prank", got it. Since I know
> everything is done consistently, that means anything goes. Thanks
> for the blank check.
>
Wah....wah.....
Corporate noting policy was NOT broken. It was not an anonymous account.
Bruce gave what was, IMO, a legitimate reason for the authorship of his note.
It's a situation which I fear is going to get worse before it gets better. It
would seem that accounts on VAXes and AXPs are going to be a thing of the past,
from the memos I've been getting.
Now they're telling me that I'm going to have to use Microsoft Exchange, mainly
because I have a PC in my office. The fact that I only use it for Word and for
testing some network PC software we write is falling on deaf ears.
So, I think there's going to be more of those way-out "node" strings.
As to the innocent college prank statement, it was a reference to the MrT-like
"I'm leaving" note Bruce put in some time ago....
Now that I've explained far more than I intended to, or even felt was
worthwhile, there you have it....
'Saw
|
63.2802 | LOOKING GOOD!!!!! JUST WHAT I WANTED TO SEE | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Sep 13 1996 10:40 | 43 |
63.2803 | All the way baby!!! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Sep 17 1996 14:10 | 21 |
63.2804 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Sep 17 1996 14:11 | 2 |
63.2805 | 'nuf ced | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Sep 17 1996 14:20 | 2 |
63.2806 | and they still sip! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Tue Sep 17 1996 14:48 | 7 |
63.2807 | both work for me...... | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Sep 17 1996 15:50 | 5 |
63.2808 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Sep 18 1996 09:57 | 4 |
63.2809 | LET THE PLAYOFFS BEGIN!!! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Sep 18 1996 12:21 | 7 |
63.2810 | TICK T I C K T I C K ! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Sep 24 1996 17:05 | 25 |
63.2811 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Sep 24 1996 19:51 | 13 |
63.2812 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Sep 24 1996 21:36 | 2 |
63.2813 | What's the problem = Head case | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed Sep 25 1996 07:56 | 2 |
63.2814 | | SMART2::CHILDS | | Wed Sep 25 1996 08:37 | 4 |
63.2815 | Indians fans??? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Sep 25 1996 10:46 | 3 |
63.2816 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Sep 25 1996 11:12 | 3 |
63.2817 | TICK T I C K T I C K ! ! ! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Sep 25 1996 11:15 | 6 |
63.2818 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Sep 25 1996 12:16 | 5 |
63.2819 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Sep 25 1996 12:34 | 8 |
63.2820 | Belle has reason to worry | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Sep 25 1996 13:04 | 11 |
63.2821 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Sep 25 1996 13:30 | 1 |
63.2822 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Sep 25 1996 14:17 | 8 |
63.2823 | | 2543::MAIEWSKI | Atlanta Braves, N.L. East Champs | Wed Sep 25 1996 14:28 | 8 |
63.2824 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Sep 25 1996 15:07 | 6 |
63.2825 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Sep 25 1996 15:50 | 5 |
63.2826 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Sep 26 1996 10:47 | 6 |
63.2827 | 2nd year in a row!!! CHAMPIONS! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Sep 30 1996 13:45 | 25 |
63.2828 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Sep 30 1996 14:11 | 3 |
63.2829 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Sep 30 1996 14:13 | 4 |
63.2830 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Sep 30 1996 14:36 | 2 |
63.2831 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 01 1996 13:15 | 3 |
63.2832 | HOW ABOUT SOME SCORES AND UPDATES... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:19 | 30 |
63.2833 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:19 | 4 |
63.2834 | Lovin' it... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:36 | 9 |
63.2835 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:42 | 3 |
63.2836 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:59 | 3 |
63.2837 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:03 | 8 |
63.2838 | score please... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:18 | 16 |
63.2839 | Down to the wire... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:20 | 31 |
63.2840 | tick, t i c k, TICK, T I C K, T I C K ! ! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:28 | 20 |
63.2841 | TICK T I C K T I C K T I C K | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:44 | 6 |
63.2842 | 9-3 | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:53 | 6 |
63.2843 | | SALEM::DODA | Out of my mind, back in 5 minutes | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:54 | 1 |
63.2844 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:54 | 3 |
63.2845 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Oct 01 1996 17:01 | 7 |
63.2846 | | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Tue Oct 01 1996 17:02 | 4 |
63.2847 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Oct 01 1996 17:16 | 4 |
63.2848 | After 7.5 | MOVMON::DAVIS | | Tue Oct 01 1996 17:28 | 93 |
63.2849 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Tue Oct 01 1996 18:41 | 5 |
63.2850 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 01 1996 20:39 | 2 |
63.2851 | Good timing Glenn | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 01 1996 20:39 | 2 |
63.2852 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 01 1996 20:47 | 8 |
63.2853 | GO ORIOLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed Oct 02 1996 08:28 | 2 |
63.2854 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 02 1996 09:07 | 8 |
63.2855 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 02 1996 09:38 | 10 |
63.2856 | figured i'd enter chappy's reply for him | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 02 1996 09:42 | 3 |
63.2857 | | NQOS01::nqsrv137.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Wed Oct 02 1996 09:58 | 3 |
63.2858 | I hope the Birds drop another one on em. | STRATA::BTOWER | | Wed Oct 02 1996 10:10 | 4 |
63.2859 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Oct 02 1996 10:12 | 10 |
63.2860 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 02 1996 11:26 | 2 |
63.2861 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Oct 02 1996 11:55 | 8 |
63.2862 | Deer in the headlights... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 02 1996 12:09 | 9 |
63.2863 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 02 1996 12:56 | 3 |
63.2864 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Wed Oct 02 1996 13:14 | 1 |
63.2865 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Oct 02 1996 14:54 | 8 |
63.2866 | 1-0 after 1 | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Wed Oct 02 1996 15:16 | 8 |
63.2867 | top of 3 | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Wed Oct 02 1996 15:29 | 8 |
63.2868 | Brady goes yard, again... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 02 1996 16:08 | 27 |
63.2869 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 02 1996 16:18 | 2 |
63.2870 | My hero Cal comes through again-- Indians sweating... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 02 1996 16:21 | 29 |
63.2871 | Double, Indian-reject Murray, make it 4-0 | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 02 1996 16:23 | 1 |
63.2872 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Oct 02 1996 16:24 | 3 |
63.2873 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Tastes like chicken | Wed Oct 02 1996 16:25 | 7 |
63.2874 | | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Wed Oct 02 1996 16:30 | 4 |
63.2875 | Not so fast-- Albert strikes! 4-3 O's | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 02 1996 16:38 | 6 |
63.2876 | any more updates??? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Oct 02 1996 17:27 | 1 |
63.2877 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 02 1996 17:29 | 5 |
63.2878 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 02 1996 17:34 | 2 |
63.2879 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Oct 02 1996 17:34 | 2 |
63.2880 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 02 1996 18:12 | 2 |
63.2881 | O's up 2-0 | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Wed Oct 02 1996 18:14 | 1 |
63.2882 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | A reclined state of mind | Wed Oct 02 1996 18:14 | 9 |
63.2883 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Wed Oct 02 1996 18:15 | 7 |
63.2884 | looks bleak... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Oct 02 1996 18:45 | 4 |
63.2885 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Oct 02 1996 18:50 | 23 |
63.2886 | Next 3 in the Jake | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 02 1996 18:51 | 2 |
63.2887 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 02 1996 19:01 | 31 |
63.2888 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 02 1996 20:53 | 3 |
63.2889 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Wed Oct 02 1996 23:12 | 16 |
63.2890 | That #$%^!! fat lady can get lost ;-) | IROCZ::BKWAL | | Thu Oct 03 1996 07:38 | 4 |
63.2891 | Could be the gag of the century | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Thu Oct 03 1996 08:23 | 3 |
63.2892 | SWEEP SWEEP SWEEP now dump them in the trash can. | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Thu Oct 03 1996 08:33 | 2 |
63.2893 | Not quite yet... | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Thu Oct 03 1996 09:16 | 7 |
63.2894 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 03 1996 09:51 | 6 |
63.2895 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 03 1996 10:00 | 2 |
63.2896 | Parade in Baltimore by Monday | STRATA::BTOWER | | Thu Oct 03 1996 10:11 | 2 |
63.2897 | fat lady is getting ready | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Thu Oct 03 1996 11:37 | 1 |
63.2898 | we can do it!!! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Oct 03 1996 12:07 | 26 |
63.2899 | Indians clutching at excuses now... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 03 1996 12:21 | 16 |
63.2900 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Thu Oct 03 1996 12:29 | 17 |
63.2901 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Oct 03 1996 12:30 | 7 |
63.2902 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 03 1996 12:35 | 8 |
63.2903 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Oct 03 1996 13:43 | 6 |
63.2904 | THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Oct 03 1996 13:47 | 27 |
63.2905 | why coitainly | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Oct 03 1996 14:34 | 3 |
63.2906 | Excuses starting already??? | BIGQ::WEST | Kevin 225-4528 HLO | Thu Oct 03 1996 15:07 | 11 |
63.2907 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Oct 03 1996 19:22 | 2 |
63.2908 | Lots of fun | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | "Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof" | Fri Oct 04 1996 01:44 | 8 |
63.2909 | Life is sooo unfair, huh groaner? | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | The torture never stops... | Fri Oct 04 1996 03:58 | 11 |
63.2910 | Is that a street sweeper I hear or what? | STRATA::BTOWER | | Fri Oct 04 1996 10:17 | 2 |
63.2911 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 04 1996 10:19 | 6 |
63.2912 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:03 | 3 |
63.2913 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:09 | 2 |
63.2914 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Atlanta Braves, N.L. East Champs | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:21 | 5 |
63.2915 | Oriole or Crow? | STRATA::BTOWER | | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:37 | 10 |
63.2916 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:37 | 5 |
63.2917 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:37 | 2 |
63.2918 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:45 | 5 |
63.2919 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:57 | 3 |
63.2920 | that's all you need to know Mike | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Oct 04 1996 11:59 | 2 |
63.2921 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Fri Oct 04 1996 12:00 | 1 |
63.2922 | Now how about apologizing to the league | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Oct 04 1996 12:09 | 2 |
63.2923 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Oct 04 1996 12:28 | 3 |
63.2924 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Tastes like chicken | Fri Oct 04 1996 13:09 | 18 |
63.2925 | Sit on it, Potsie! | SHARE::DERRY | Color me impressed... | Fri Oct 04 1996 13:35 | 1 |
63.2926 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Oct 04 1996 14:18 | 3 |
63.2927 | | SALEM::DODA | Out of my mind, back in 5 minutes | Fri Oct 04 1996 14:21 | 6 |
63.2928 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Atlanta Braves, N.L. East Champs | Fri Oct 04 1996 15:34 | 12 |
63.2929 | Baltimore Nasty's | STRATA::BTOWER | | Fri Oct 04 1996 15:39 | 3 |
63.2930 | TICK T I C K T I C K | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Oct 04 1996 15:45 | 2 |
63.2931 | | STRATA::BTOWER | | Fri Oct 04 1996 15:48 | 1 |
63.2932 | zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzPUT | STRATA::BTOWER | | Fri Oct 04 1996 15:50 | 2 |
63.2933 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Oct 04 1996 15:59 | 3 |
63.2934 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Oct 04 1996 16:00 | 4 |
63.2935 | Bummer | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Sun Oct 06 1996 10:51 | 18 |
63.2936 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Sun Oct 06 1996 12:47 | 2 |
63.2937 | | tun-22.imc.das.dec.com::dfaust | Dennis Faust | Sun Oct 06 1996 19:01 | 8 |
63.2938 | BAhhhahhahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahah | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Oct 07 1996 10:04 | 11 |
63.2939 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Oct 07 1996 10:13 | 11 |
63.2940 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Oct 07 1996 10:16 | 6 |
63.2941 | Enjoy it while you can...it won't last long! | CNTROL::SALMON | | Mon Oct 07 1996 10:17 | 5 |
63.2942 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Oct 07 1996 10:28 | 13 |
63.2943 | HTH's | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Oct 07 1996 10:52 | 13 |
63.2944 | Which way to the Crow??? | IROCZ::BKWAL | | Mon Oct 07 1996 10:56 | 13 |
63.2945 | I'll enjoy it too...but the yankees.... | CNTROL::SALMON | | Mon Oct 07 1996 11:18 | 4 |
63.2946 | don't forget to vote for me | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 11:20 | 9 |
63.2947 | | SHARE::DERRY | Color me impressed... | Mon Oct 07 1996 11:22 | 1 |
63.2948 | something decent was on | HBAHBA::HAAS | Not A Sane Chap Anywhere 'Round (Racing). | Mon Oct 07 1996 11:24 | 6 |
63.2949 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 11:24 | 3 |
63.2950 | Get a clue | CNTROL::SALMON | | Mon Oct 07 1996 11:25 | 11 |
63.2951 | "Hi Sid, I'm Bobby the new Poolboy, wanna rub suntan lotion on me?" | SMART2::CHILDS | | Mon Oct 07 1996 11:38 | 8 |
63.2952 | C H O K E . . . | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:03 | 14 |
63.2954 | can you say playoff tickets...I won't! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:09 | 7 |
63.2955 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:12 | 19 |
63.2956 | There Ought To Be A Law | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:19 | 2 |
63.2957 | Biggest gag, hack, cough, choke of recent memory | LUDWIG::BTOWER | | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:20 | 5 |
63.2959 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:33 | 6 |
63.2960 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:35 | 3 |
63.2961 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:35 | 9 |
63.2962 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 12:39 | 15 |
63.2964 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 13:55 | 10 |
63.2965 | MIND BURP.....CHARLES NAGY.... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Oct 07 1996 13:58 | 35 |
63.2967 | reality hurts | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 14:08 | 9 |
63.2972 | original on file for those who want to see the real sender | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 14:15 | 10 |
63.2974 | | NQOS01::nqsrv125.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Oct 07 1996 14:21 | 5 |
63.2975 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 14:22 | 4 |
63.2977 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 14:27 | 5 |
63.2979 | Pardon me whilst I burp..... | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Oct 07 1996 14:39 | 18 |
63.2980 | | NQOS01::nqsrv125.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Oct 07 1996 14:39 | 1 |
63.2982 | | NQOS01::nqsrv125.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Oct 07 1996 14:50 | 11 |
63.2983 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Oct 07 1996 15:00 | 18 |
63.2984 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Oct 07 1996 15:03 | 4 |
63.2985 | :-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Oct 07 1996 15:05 | 3 |
63.2986 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Oct 07 1996 15:09 | 5 |
63.2987 | | SALEM::DODA | Out of my mind, back in 5 minutes | Mon Oct 07 1996 15:15 | 1 |
63.2988 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Oct 07 1996 15:19 | 4 |
63.2989 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Mon Oct 07 1996 15:46 | 3 |
63.2990 | Red I ain't. And BTW when are we getting going? | CSLALL::BRULE | Smoke on the Water | Tue Oct 08 1996 09:16 | 11 |
63.2991 | the worm turns.... | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Tue Oct 08 1996 10:20 | 10 |
63.2992 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Ben Coates the Princess of TE's | Tue Oct 08 1996 13:09 | 14 |
63.2993 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 08 1996 17:14 | 8 |
63.2994 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Tue Oct 08 1996 18:13 | 5 |
63.2995 | enjoy | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 08 1996 20:56 | 2 |
63.2996 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Ben Coates the Princess of TE's | Wed Oct 09 1996 09:47 | 11 |
63.2997 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Wed Oct 09 1996 10:42 | 5 |
63.2998 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 11:30 | 6 |
63.2999 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:00 | 3 |
63.3000 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:10 | 6 |
63.3001 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Ben Coates the Princess of TE's | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:11 | 12 |
63.3002 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Ben Coates the Princess of TE's | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:11 | 5 |
63.3003 | humane except... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Not A Sane Chap Anywhere 'Round | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:21 | 12 |
63.3004 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:21 | 6 |
63.3005 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:23 | 4 |
63.3006 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:29 | 7 |
63.3007 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:36 | 2 |
63.3008 | | VMSNET::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:38 | 9 |
63.3009 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:39 | 4 |
63.3010 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Wed Oct 09 1996 13:30 | 6 |
63.3011 | huh??? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Oct 09 1996 13:45 | 3 |
63.3012 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 14:47 | 2 |
63.3013 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Oct 09 1996 14:47 | 7 |
63.3014 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 14:50 | 3 |
63.3015 | what a bonehead! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Wed Oct 09 1996 15:53 | 6 |
63.3016 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | I need a favor, Don Cornelius... | Wed Oct 09 1996 16:23 | 7 |
63.3017 | Veg heads get a life! | SALEM::DODA | Out of my mind, back in 5 minutes | Wed Oct 09 1996 16:23 | 0 |
63.3018 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 16:33 | 2 |
63.3019 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Wed Oct 09 1996 17:04 | 10 |
63.3020 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 17:39 | 3 |
63.3021 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 17:39 | 2 |
63.3022 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Wed Oct 09 1996 17:47 | 1 |
63.3023 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 17:54 | 4 |
63.3024 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Oct 09 1996 18:05 | 16 |
63.3025 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 09 1996 18:09 | 7 |
63.3026 | a couple of good places to start | HBAHBA::HAAS | Not A Sane Chap Anywhere 'Round | Wed Oct 09 1996 18:29 | 12 |
63.3027 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Oct 10 1996 10:12 | 2 |
63.3028 | Maybe next year... | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Oct 16 1996 11:26 | 7 |
63.3029 | 'nuff said - city of losers | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 16 1996 11:31 | 2 |
63.3030 | | VMSNET::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 17 1996 14:22 | 6 |
63.3031 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Nov 13 1996 16:19 | 7 |
63.3032 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Wed Nov 13 1996 16:25 | 4 |
63.3033 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Nov 13 1996 16:26 | 3 |
63.3034 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 14 1996 08:07 | 10 |
63.3035 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 14 1996 08:08 | 10 |
63.3036 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 14 1996 08:24 | 11 |
63.3037 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Thu Nov 14 1996 08:28 | 7 |
63.3038 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 14 1996 08:42 | 10 |
63.3039 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Thu Nov 14 1996 09:07 | 19 |
63.3040 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Nov 14 1996 10:09 | 6 |
63.3041 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Thu Nov 14 1996 10:28 | 3 |
63.3042 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 14 1996 10:34 | 17 |
63.3043 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pettitte wuz robbed! | Thu Nov 14 1996 10:34 | 15 |
63.3044 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 14 1996 10:36 | 4 |
63.3045 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Nov 14 1996 10:37 | 12 |
63.3046 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Nov 14 1996 10:42 | 2 |
63.3047 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Thu Nov 14 1996 10:55 | 13 |
63.3048 | Why are you grinning? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pettitte wuz robbed! | Thu Nov 14 1996 11:06 | 9 |
63.3049 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 14 1996 11:11 | 9 |
63.3050 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Nov 14 1996 11:25 | 8 |
63.3051 | USA Today... | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Thu Nov 14 1996 11:50 | 34 |
63.3052 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Nov 14 1996 14:11 | 4 |
63.3053 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Thu Nov 14 1996 14:23 | 2 |
63.3054 | Ah, the fantasies of the wannabees... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu Nov 14 1996 15:56 | 12 |
63.3055 | Indians are very potent even without Belle | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Welcome back, NBA! | Thu Nov 14 1996 16:08 | 17 |
63.3056 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Nov 14 1996 16:54 | 16 |
63.3057 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 14 1996 17:06 | 42 |
63.3058 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri Nov 15 1996 09:05 | 10 |
63.3059 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Nov 15 1996 09:23 | 29 |
63.3060 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Nov 15 1996 10:14 | 10 |
63.3061 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Fri Nov 15 1996 10:27 | 3 |
63.3062 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Fri Nov 15 1996 12:27 | 7 |
63.3063 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri Nov 15 1996 14:48 | 10 |
63.3064 | have a clue | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Nov 15 1996 14:57 | 4 |
63.3065 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Tastes like chicken. | Fri Nov 15 1996 15:10 | 6 |
63.3066 | Or Pinky Higgins his earlier persona | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Fri Nov 15 1996 15:28 | 11 |
63.3067 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Nov 15 1996 15:34 | 13 |
63.3068 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Tastes like chicken. | Fri Nov 15 1996 15:40 | 5 |
63.3069 | Sans Mentir, si votre plummage | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Fri Nov 15 1996 15:48 | 8 |
63.3070 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Nov 15 1996 15:55 | 4 |
63.3071 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Nov 15 1996 16:36 | 4 |
63.3072 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Nov 15 1996 16:39 | 30 |
63.3073 | Let Belle Go And Buy A Pitcher | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Sun Nov 17 1996 16:33 | 9 |
63.3074 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Nov 18 1996 09:02 | 22 |
63.3075 | Mais non | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pettitte wuz robbed! | Mon Nov 18 1996 09:06 | 11 |
63.3076 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Nov 18 1996 10:29 | 2 |
63.3077 | Big Frank and Fat Albert? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pettitte wuz robbed! | Mon Nov 18 1996 13:17 | 12 |
63.3078 | | PCBUOA::MORGAN | | Mon Nov 18 1996 13:18 | 3 |
63.3079 | $50M, $60M, $70M... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pettitte wuz robbed! | Mon Nov 18 1996 13:20 | 6 |
63.3080 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Nov 18 1996 16:36 | 10 |
63.3081 | Belle Stays Close to Cleveland | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Nov 18 1996 16:39 | 1 |
63.3082 | | NQOS01::nqsrv145.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Nov 18 1996 22:22 | 5 |
63.3083 | hmmmmm..... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Nov 19 1996 13:16 | 2 |
63.3084 | Cleveland still the favorite | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Welcome back, NBA! | Tue Nov 19 1996 13:24 | 7 |
63.3085 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Nov 19 1996 13:27 | 6 |
63.3086 | He's there | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Happy b-day Kevin my main | Tue Nov 19 1996 13:33 | 10 |
63.3087 | Jerry "do as I say, not as I do" Reinsdorf | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Welcome back, NBA! | Tue Nov 19 1996 15:31 | 5 |
63.3088 | Still two ms | GIADEV::BREEN | | Tue Nov 19 1996 15:52 | 6 |
63.3089 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Nov 19 1996 16:47 | 2 |
63.3090 | BIG PAIN | CNTROL::KING | | Wed Nov 20 1996 07:58 | 2 |
63.3091 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Nov 20 1996 08:18 | 23 |
63.3092 | A very rich man | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Nov 20 1996 09:12 | 14 |
63.3093 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Nov 20 1996 09:35 | 12 |
63.3094 | Owners at it again | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | No directions needed | Wed Nov 20 1996 09:44 | 15 |
63.3095 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Nov 20 1996 10:20 | 2 |
63.3096 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Nov 20 1996 10:20 | 4 |
63.3097 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Nov 20 1996 10:33 | 5 |
63.3098 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Nov 20 1996 10:49 | 5 |
63.3099 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Nov 27 1996 13:42 | 6 |
63.3100 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Nov 27 1996 13:48 | 11 |
63.3101 | hey, if Jeff Kent has played second... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Wed Nov 27 1996 13:54 | 4 |
63.3102 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Nov 27 1996 14:35 | 11 |
63.3103 | Jay Bell is a different story | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Wed Nov 27 1996 15:16 | 3 |
63.3104 | Bank this | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Nov 27 1996 15:43 | 2 |
63.3105 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Nov 27 1996 16:04 | 13 |
63.3106 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Nov 27 1996 16:13 | 8 |
63.3107 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Nov 27 1996 16:18 | 12 |
63.3108 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Nov 27 1996 16:55 | 3 |
63.3109 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm (412)829-0710 | Mon Dec 02 1996 12:40 | 15 |
63.3110 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Dec 02 1996 13:03 | 4 |
63.3111 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Dec 02 1996 13:39 | 46 |
63.3112 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Dec 02 1996 15:52 | 6 |
63.3113 | Hopeful that Rocket Roger also stays | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys Champs Again | Thu Dec 12 1996 23:19 | 6 |
63.3114 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Dec 13 1996 08:13 | 8 |
63.3115 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Fri Dec 13 1996 08:48 | 14 |
63.3116 | speed kills | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Dec 19 1996 10:23 | 2 |
63.3117 | Indians' projected starters... | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Thu Dec 19 1996 11:27 | 10 |
63.3118 | Valentin an Indian? Nah... | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Thu Dec 19 1996 11:31 | 12 |
63.3119 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Dec 19 1996 11:54 | 12 |
63.3120 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Dec 19 1996 14:46 | 4 |
63.3121 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Dec 30 1996 08:42 | 4 |
63.3122 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 06 1997 11:06 | 6 |
63.3123 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Mon Jan 06 1997 11:16 | 6 |
63.3124 | same old byrd shit | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 06 1997 13:55 | 4 |
63.3125 | | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 06 1997 15:14 | 2 |
63.3126 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Mon Jan 06 1997 15:52 | 8 |
63.3127 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 06 1997 16:56 | 1 |
63.3128 | from USA Today | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Thu Jan 30 1997 12:01 | 18 |
| CLEVELAND - Albert Belle and Carlos Baerga are already members of the
Cleveland Indians'
alumni club. Will Kenny Lofton join them as ex-Indians? Cleveland
general manager John Hart said
that Lofton's agent has informed the team that baseball's top leadoff
man will file for free agency
when his contact expires after the coming season. "He said he still
wanted to talk to us, but he also
said he was going to test the free-agent waters," said Hart, who also
noted that the Indians want to
keep Lofton. Lofton will earn $4.75 million in 1997. Lofton has won
five straight stolen base
crowns, averaged 108 runs the last five seasons and captured four
consecutive Gold Gloves.
Former teammates Belle signed the richest contract in baseball history
(five years, $55 million) with
the White Sox this offseason and the Indians traded Baerga to the Mets
last summer.
|
63.3129 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu Jan 30 1997 12:32 | 3 |
| Rumor has it that Lofton and several others want to return to Arizona
to play for the D'backs. '97 is supposed to have a bumper crop of
FA's.
|
63.3130 | Bye-bye Kenny | ALFSS2::TAYLOR_D | Hang On, Sloopy | Mon Feb 10 1997 12:25 | 216 |
| Hart's move has Lofton looking like the bad guy
GM turns tables by announcing center fielder's
wish to become free agent
By Sheldon Ocker
Beacon Journal sports writer
February 2, 1997
John Hart believed he was asking a simple,
straightforward question that called for a
response in kind.
"What will it take to keep Kenny in
Cleveland?" the Indians' general manager
reportedly asked Steve Zucker, the agent for
center fielder Kenny Lofton.
How about $7 million a year? What about $8
million? More? Hart pressed the issue. Zucker
had no answer, but his lack of a reply spoke
volumes.
Zucker didn't want to talk about it, because
Lofton was looking forward to becoming a free
agent -- and probably walking away from the
Indians.
Hart took the hint. He is tired of being the
fall guy in this winter's Free Agent Follies.
He made an honest effort to land John Smoltz,
Alex Fernandez, Tim Naehring, Ryne Sandberg
and Roger Clemens, yet he came up empty.
Enough.
This was not a case of mismanaged
negotiations by Hart. He had offered millions
upon millions of dollars; he had taken
players on guided tours of Cleveland; he had
fed them at the best restaurants and checked
out school systems for their children.
And he had come oh so close. Fernandez even
said yes. But Hart's efforts were sabotaged
by the pitcher's wife and in-laws, who
persuaded him to return home to Miami.
The real problem: Hart was chasing players he
had no chance of signing and was taking the
heat because he had failed, a result that had
been inevitable.
Now came Lofton, whose silence was a portent
of more bad news. So before word spread that
Hart was being a cheapskate with Dick Jacobs'
money. ...
Before the talk show hosts could ask, "Is
Hart really trying?" ...
Before Hart was put on the defensive and
forced to justify his methods, he went on the
attack.
He let the cat out of the bag. He informed
the media that Lofton would opt for free
agency after the 1997 season. He indicated
that negotiations have been virtually
nonexistent, because Lofton declined to
delineate his objectives.
Hart didn't place blame, but he sure did
shift the burden of responsibility. Zucker
probably lost his lunch when he found out.
The last thing he needed was to have his
client transformed into Alger Hiss.
In an instant, Hart turned his center fielder
into just another greedy player looking for
the big score. So Cleveland wasn't good
enough for Lofton anymore. Many talk show
callers viewed him as nothing less than a
traitor.
During halftime of the Cavaliers-Knicks game
Wednesday night, Lofton's image was flashed
on the Gund Arena telescreen. Thousands
booed. To my knowledge, this has happened
only twice before, when the faces of Art
Modell and Bill Belichick appeared on the
giant television monitor.
Did Lofton belong in the company of these
local villains? Hart had put him there.
More than one kind of game is played at
Jacobs Field. If Lofton didn't know it
before, he will find out as the season wears
on. Fans still will cheer his doubles in the
gap and his spectacular leaping catches, but
he will be watched closely for signs of
creeping selfishness.
Conventional wisdom dictates that Lofton will
play his butt off in the hopes of breaking
the bank once free agency kicks in. But he
will not get a free ride from the fans.
Customers constantly will wonder if Lofton
refused to steal a base for fear of getting
hurt. They will test his congeniality with
endless questions about the future. He will
be viewed with the faintest hint of suspicion
by people who never before questioned his
motives.
This might not wear well with Lofton. He is
not a man given to perspective. As some
executives in the Indians' organization say,
"Kenny has his opinions."
If Lofton is challenged, he will snap back.
If he is doubted, he will defend himself.
From where he stands, he is doing nothing
wrong.
Every player has the right to explore free
agency when the time comes. If Lofton wants
to play for the expansion Diamondbacks or bat
leadoff for the Dodgers, why shouldn't he
pursue his dreams?
It's cold in Cleveland. Haven't you seen
Lofton's neck wrapped in wool, taking batting
practice in a ski cap before wintry night
games?
Every man has a right to be warm, doesn't he?
The rules say Lofton can deal with any team
that courts him when his contract expires in
the fall. True enough. He won't get an
argument from me.
But explain that to Cleveland fans who waited
nine hours in the dead of winter for bleacher
seats to a game against the Twins. No matter
what Lofton says -- if he says anything -- it
will sound like a lame excuse by a player
with a runaway ego.
Which brings up a more pressing issue. How
can a team that sells out the entire season
to its adoring fans and is located in a city
with a newly won upbeat reputation lose its
two best players to free agency?
Is this still about a Cleveland that once
went bankrupt and whose river caught on fire
20 years ago? Will the Indians ever reach a
point where the players they nurture to
superstardom elect to stick around?
Or is this solely about the personalities and
appetites of Albert Belle, who fled to
Chicago, and Lofton, who is more likely to go
than to stay?
Having known both players since they arrived
in Cleveland, I would have been surprised had
they elected to pass up free agency.
Belle never made a secret of the fact he is
motivated by money. Don't knock it. Belle's
burning quest for the matchless contract is
one factor in his incredible drive and focus.
It makes him a better player, if not a kinder
and gentler person. Not long before Belle
signed with the White Sox, a former player
who knows Belle said, "Albert will go with
the team that offers him 10 cents more."
If it's only a question of money, Lofton
still might end up in Cleveland. After all,
the game isn't over yet. But it's unlikely
that Northeast Ohio can satisfy Lofton's
long-term lifestyle goals.
Lofton likes warm weather. Though raised near
Chicago, he lives in Tucson. He also loves
the spotlight of celebrity. On occasions when
a film star or rock singer shows up in the
Tribe clubhouse, Lofton is the first to greet
him.
Two years ago, Kevin Costner attended a game
at Jacobs Field. Afterward, he visited the
clubhouse. When Lofton saw the actor, his mad
dash to welcome him almost knocked Costner to
the floor.
So unless global warming suddenly turns Lake
Erie into the Gulf of Mexico or the film
industry decides to relocate near Public
Square, the Indians will be at a distinct
disadvantage in trying to keep Lofton.
But take heart, Tribe fans. There probably
are superstars out there who love April
snowstorms and think Dick Goddard is every
bit as renowned as Sly Stallone.
All John Hart has to do is find them.
|
63.3131 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 10 1997 12:54 | 6 |
|
The Indians better win it all this year, or they're in danger of
becoming the latest Dynasty that Never Was (Even Close)...
glenn
|
63.3132 | 24 hours to accept | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Feb 10 1997 15:11 | 2 |
| I hereby offer on behalf of Dan Duquette Cordero,Valentin and Wakefield
for Kenny.
|
63.3133 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Feb 10 1997 15:32 | 4 |
| I could turn that deal down in 5 seconds if I were Cleveland.
Actually, it only takes 1 second to hang up a phone...
|
63.3134 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Feb 10 1997 15:49 | 5 |
| Surprisingly I don't believe the Redsox would make the offer except for
the money angle. From a strict baseball point of view and including
the view that Lofton is gone anyway I would think they'd look this
offer over. The problem in reality is the three salaries involved for
the Sox trio, way too high (5-6 million).
|
63.3135 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 10 1997 15:53 | 12 |
|
> From a strict baseball point of view and including
> the view that Lofton is gone anyway I would think they'd look this
> offer over. The problem in reality is the three salaries involved for
> the Sox trio, way too high (5-6 million).
There's no "problem" in reality. The Indians want to win this year.
Acquiring a bum like Wakefield would work against that purpose (and
they don't need Cordero, nor Valentin for the most part).
glenn
|
63.3136 | from Sportsline | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Tue Feb 11 1997 11:35 | 157 |
| Cleveland Indians
INSIDE PITCH:
What the Indians have now, officially, is an independent contractor in
center field.
Oh sure, technically he's still a member of the team. But not really.
Not now. He's no longer a
member of the nucleus of the Cleveland Indians. He is now, by choice, a
mercenary.
An independent contractor.
The roadrunner is a lame duck.
Kenny Lofton is no longer playing for the hearts and minds of Indians
fans. Nor is he playing, in the
strictest sense of the word, for the town or the team. In 1997, he's
playing for himself, thank you.
For Numero Uno. Kenny Lofton is playing for Kenny Lofton this year, and
no one else. Then he's
outta here.
For 162 games this season, Lofton will wear an Indians uniform and use
all the Indians' facilities in
order to market himself to the best of his ability to whichever team he
intends to jump to in 1998.
The only question that remains is whether the opening day sellout at
Jacobs Field will cheer him or
boo him.
Unlike the Albert Belle tango of a year ago, where the "will they or
won't they'' charade was at least
carried on to opening day, Lofton has pulled the plug early on any
hopes Indians officials had of
employing him beyond 1997.
Lofton has told club officials that he does not want to negotiate a new
contract, and that he intends
to test the free agent waters following the 1997 season. By doing so,
the most electrifying player
perhaps in the history of the franchise is willingly evicting himself
from what was supposed to be one
of baseball's elite addresses.
But don't cry for him, Ashtabula.
And shed no tears for the Indians, either. Tribe officials are big
boys, and they have already come to
terms with the fact that, in consecutive years, they are likely going
to lose the greatest left fielder and
the greatest leadoff hitter in the history of the franchise.
"Welcome to baseball in the 90s,'' said Indians general manager John
Hart. "We don't like it, but
we've got to deal with it.''
Hart admits he was left scratching his head when told by Steve Zucker,
Lofton's agent, that No.7
wants to cut bait with the Indians after this year.
"We knew this was going to be a bumpy ride with Kenny,'' Hart said. "So
I'm disappointed, but not
shocked.''
The Indians never even got a chance to make an offer.
"We made some overtures on where we would like to take Kenny,'' Hart
said. "But before we even
got out of the gate, Zucker said that Kenny wants to test the market.
That he doesn't want to
negotiate.''
What exactly is Lofton looking for?
Don't ask Hart.
"We've got a great ballpark, a full house every night, we win. We have
all the criteria you'd like to
have,'' Hart said. "We haven't gotten dumb overnight. What our fans
have to understand is that in
some cases like this, there isn't a lot a club can do.''
If Lofton leaves, he would become the fifth starter from the 1995
American League champions to
disappear. The others: Belle, Carlos Baerga, Eddie Murray, and Paul
Sorrento. What do the
Indians have to show for the loss of those five players?
Matt Williams.
Hart now says he saw this day coming.
"We knew we had a lot of star players, and we signed them to multi-year
contracts to bring stability
to this franchise for the first time in 40 years,'' he said. "To keep
those players, we felt the industry
had to change. It hasn't. And we can't control that. Therefore, it's
tougher to hang on to big-time
star players, unless they have a degree of loyalty.''
Belle had none. Lofton looks like he has none. Baerga, Murray, and
Sorrento were let go willingly.
"In a way, we're the victims of our own success,'' Hart said. "We have
not had any contract
squabbles at all. Now, the 90s are catching up to us.''
So what's Hart's next move? Trade Lofton?
Don't count on it.
Lofton has no greater incentive to produce a career year than the fact
that he will become a free
agent at the end of the season. If Lofton is going to use the Indians
to market himself to one of their
rivals, why shouldn't the Indians use him to make one more run at the
World Series with this core
group of players?
"I harbor no desire to trade Kenny,'' Hart said. "If we didn't already
have a good club, I might look
more closely at a trade. I will say I'm more inclined to look at it now
than I was a week ago. But it's
hard to trade a guy in his free agent year.''
Call him an idealist, but as Rome crumbles around him -- he, of course,
would dispute that -- Hart
is waxing philosophical.
"This is a cyclical deal,'' he said. "You want to stay a contender
every year. And we hope to. It just
may not be with the same cast.''
Translation: goodbye Lofton, hello Chad Curtis?
Ouch
NOTES, QUOTES, ANECDOTES:
If Lofton does leave, the Indians' cupboard is bare.
It's as simple as that.
While the Indians' farm system is well stocked with pitchers, first and
third basemen, and left and
right fielders, when it comes to center fielders, forget it.
"We're not going to kid ourselves. We have nobody in our system with
the impact skills in center
field of a Kenny Lofton,'' said Tribe farm director Mark Shapiro. "We
have guys who can play
center field, but none of them are projected to have the impact at the
major league level of a
Lofton.''
|
63.3137 | | NQOS01::nqsrv418.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Inside Intel | Tue Feb 11 1997 12:30 | 2 |
|
Word here is that Lofton is looking at the D'backs.
|
63.3138 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 25 1997 09:57 | 9 |
|
Bombshell trade this morning (according to CNN): Dave Justice, Marquis
Grissom to the Indians for Kenny Lofton, Alan Embree.
Can't like this if I'm an Indians fan...
glenn
|
63.3139 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Spring Training is here | Tue Mar 25 1997 10:02 | 5 |
| Glenn Why? Lofton and Grissom I think is a wash. Lofton was
supposedly gone at the end of the year. If Justice is healthy this is a
hell of an addition.
Mike
|
63.3140 | Heard a different one this a.m. | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | regnaD kciN, my hero | Tue Mar 25 1997 10:04 | 6 |
| Was going to enter a Grissom and Lemke (Indians need a 2B?) for Lofton
trade rumor in here earlier. Don't know much about Embree except he's
a lefty reliever? If he's any good at all he will be a welcome addition to
an anemic Braves bullpen.
UMDan
|
63.3141 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Mar 25 1997 10:09 | 9 |
|
He could be good, but it's not clear yet.
I'm stunned. I'm not fond of the idea of Grissom leading off - his
assests are more in the way of power than OBP, though Lofton's been
slipping in that department the past couple of years. I like Justice,
but he doesn't really help much - Giles can play.
Joe
|
63.3142 | Can Marguis, Justice make it in the bigs? | MKOTS3::BREEN | From Thurs to Sunday | Tue Mar 25 1997 10:31 | 9 |
| Fantastic move for Atlanta. Illustrates more than ever why they're at
the top. Lofton is a whole step above Grissom. It'd be nice if they
can sign him.
As with most trades despite helping Atlanta immensely it's probably to
the Indians benefit too.
I'm wary of National League stats repeating in the A.L. - should I be
Joe from what you can tell?
|
63.3143 | It's official | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Any day now.... | Tue Mar 25 1997 10:33 | 10 |
| Just heard on the radio that it's a done deal - Lofton and Embree for
Grissom and Justice.
3 free agents after this year - Glavine, Maddux and Lofton, can you say
"Show me the money!"
Hot dogs are gonna cost $15 next year if they re-sign all 3.
UMDan
|
63.3144 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Mar 25 1997 10:42 | 24 |
|
> Fantastic move for Atlanta. Illustrates more than ever why they're at
> the top. Lofton is a whole step above Grissom. It'd be nice if they
> can sign him.
I'm not certain about the whole step - Lofton isn't taking walks like
he used to. It's not at all a bad move for Atlanta, though, _if_ they
can keep Lofton.
> As with most trades despite helping Atlanta immensely it's probably to
> the Indians benefit too.
I'm not certain of this - it only helps Cleveland if Justice is
noticably better than Giles, and I'm not convinced he will be.
> I'm wary of National League stats repeating in the A.L. - should I be
> Joe from what you can tell?
Not particularly - given the park effects involved, Lofton's stats
might improve a bit (though his AB will likely go down), and Justice's
and Grissom's slip a bit on a per-AB basis.
Joe
|
63.3145 | Grat move for Cleveland | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass in 1998 - Final Four! | Tue Mar 25 1997 11:23 | 7 |
| I think this is a great move for Cleveland. They get one of the best
CF in the game and a good RF for a guy who didn't want to be in
Cleveland and a middle reliever. Lofton surely was gonna leave at the
end of the year and the Indians would have received nothing. Seems to
me like the Indians salvaged their season with this deal.
NAZZ
|
63.3146 | Homer Dome | BRLLNT::LONG | Taxation without representation | Tue Mar 25 1997 11:27 | 5 |
| Since Lofton will now get to play at Coors "Park Effect" Park
his numbers will most assuredly improve. :^)
billl
|
63.3147 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Mar 25 1997 13:23 | 5 |
| why would Atlanta do the deal if they didn't feel they could resign Lofton?
Unless they plan to cut him loose at the end of the year to free up money
for Glavine and Maddux........
mike
|
63.3148 | A one year and done acquisition | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass in 1998 - Final Four! | Tue Mar 25 1997 13:27 | 3 |
| Exactly.
NAZZ
|
63.3149 | Fans give thumbs up | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Any day now.... | Tue Mar 25 1997 14:25 | 12 |
| Listening to the radio at lunch all the talking heads seemed to be in
favor of the trade, along with the fans calling in. The big concern
IS the fact that Lofton will be a FA after this year, and that a great
year could get him what, $7 - 10 mil/per? Along with Maddux, Glavine
and Klesko the Braves will be looking at big bucks to keep these folks
around.
The sleeper seems to be Embree. If he comes around he'll be a real
asset to the Braves, who are bringing up 17 pitchers for the exhibition
games this weekend against the Yankmee's.
UMDan
|
63.3150 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Tue Mar 25 1997 14:34 | 9 |
| I think the Braves were quite happy to move Justice's salary elsewhere.
It may be a calculated risk with keeping Lofton. Maybe they're only
renting his services for a season. So at the end of the season,
depending on how the Braves do, he may well decide to opt the free
agent route. If the Braves win the World Series, I think he'll be gone
for sure, taking the biggest offer a-la-Belle. I'd be only slighlty
surprised if he took something less to play for Phoenix.
Ted
|
63.3151 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Tue Mar 25 1997 14:56 | 3 |
|
Altanta is the second launching pad of the National league. Lofton
will benefit from playing half of his games in Atlanta also.
|
63.3152 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Mar 25 1997 15:41 | 4 |
|
Yup - some raw stats will suffer from fewer AB, though.
Joe
|
63.3153 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Mar 25 1997 15:47 | 11 |
| This looks like a good deal for both sides. The Braves didn't need five
outfielders so trading one for a pitcher makes sense. As for the Indians, they
did need an extra outfielder to fill the hole left when Belle signed with
Chicago.
As for next year these teams shouldn't really give a rip. When you got teams
as good as those you should go for the win, do what ever it takes. There are
no guarantees and either team could fall apart next year with players
getting old, not signing, who knows what else.
George
|
63.3154 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Mar 25 1997 15:50 | 7 |
| >As for the Indians, they
>did need an extra outfielder to fill the hole left when Belle signed with
>Chicago.
No, they didn't - they already had one (Giles).
Joe
|
63.3155 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Mar 25 1997 15:53 | 6 |
|
>> The Braves didn't need five outfielders so trading one for a pitcher
>> makes sense.
The Braves traded Justice and Grissom for Embree? What was Lofton?
A throw-in?
|
63.3156 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | From Thurs to Sunday | Tue Mar 25 1997 16:01 | 7 |
| He's subscribing to the afore mentioned view that Lofton for Grissom is
a wash which simply isn't true. I think it's precisely that upgrade
that the Braves feel they need to win a World Series this year,
something they won't accept anything less than.
Plus the salaries of Grissom and Justice are probably greater than
Lofton's.
|
63.3157 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Mar 25 1997 16:17 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 63.3155 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> >> The Braves didn't need five outfielders so trading one for a pitcher
> >> makes sense. ===
>
> The Braves traded Justice and Grissom for Embree? What was Lofton?
> A throw-in?
Use all five fingers Tommy.
The Braves had 5 outfielders. That's one extra if you figure Klesko will
platoon with either Andruw Jones or Dye.
So they trade two outfielders for one outfielder and a pitcher
5 - 2 = 3
3 + 1 = 4
As I said, they traded one outfielder for a pitcher. Trading the other
outfielder for another outfielder makes no change in the net number of
outfielders.
George
|
63.3158 | Indians moving from greatness to goodness, imo | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 25 1997 16:41 | 18 |
|
> Plus the salaries of Grissom and Justice are probably greater than
> Lofton's.
They are. The Indians take on more payroll, but have Grissom and
Justice for two more years instead of Lofton's one. But for the
1997 season, I think they take a hit, as Lofton is better than
Grissom and the performance and/or need for Justice is more
questionable.
All of this is just another step in the piecemeal demolition (by choice
or force) of that great Indians core trio of Baerga, Belle and Lofton.
They're all gone now. If Cleveland ever wins its championship it's
with a vastly different team than the one that lost the 1995 World
Series. That's kind of a shame, in a way.
glenn
|
63.3159 | Not over yet? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Any day now.... | Tue Mar 25 1997 16:59 | 7 |
| When's Groaner gonna weigh in with his enlightened opinion on this turn
of events?
More rumors down here that this is not the last trade to be made by the
Braves (McGriff and Lemke?) before the season starts.
UMDan
|
63.3160 | Here's an offer | MKOTS3::BREEN | From Thurs to Sunday | Tue Mar 25 1997 17:05 | 6 |
| Dan, I'll trade you Vaughn and Valentin for McGriff, Lemke and Glavine.
I'll even throw in Cordero for similar riffraff on your team like an
outfielder.
Surprisingly I think the Braves would do that in a heartbeat but not
the Redsox.
|
63.3161 | Wheelin' and Dealin' | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Any day now.... | Tue Mar 25 1997 17:13 | 5 |
| Take Glavine out of the picture and I'll start drawing up the papers.
If you want Glavine give up Garciaparra (and I'll throw in Blauser 'cause
I'm such a nice guy:-)
UMDan
|
63.3162 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Tue Mar 25 1997 21:08 | 22 |
|
Lofton is much better than Grissom. Defense may be a wash, but Lofton
is a much better lead-off hitter and can he distrupt a team in a series
- he stole a run in the pivotal Mariners game. Grissom will hit and
steal some bases, but this is a net loss for cleveland.
On the Justice front though, i disagree with Joe. Justice is a better
player than Giles, who has yet to prove anything. He hit .355 last
year in limited playing time - big deal. Question is, now what does
Cleveland do? Another deal is likely. They are loaded with offensive
players and need more pitchers. Mitchell, Giles and Curtis as the
back-up outfielders (that outfield is as good as the starting trio on
many teams) and Seitzer on the bench as well.
A trade for pitching is on the way, i hope its not Justice though, and
that is the rumor Joe heard.
Embree has the potential, but has not shown it... here's a guy who's a
starter in the minors, throws 92-93, blows out his shoulder, has
surgery and comes back throwing 96-97, but he's not put it together
yet.
|
63.3163 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Mar 26 1997 13:02 | 24 |
| > All of this is just another step in the piecemeal demolition (by choice
> or force) of that great Indians core trio of Baerga, Belle and Lofton.
> They're all gone now. If Cleveland ever wins its championship it's
> with a vastly different team than the one that lost the 1995 World
> Series. That's kind of a shame, in a way.
My thoughts exactly, Glenn. And the chgs are much deeper than that.
Who else is gone ? Murray, Martinez, Espinoza, Sorrento, some young
OFer, another young pitcher...
I think Cleveland gets the best of this deal. I agree with Nazz: I can't
see this as anything other than a one-year use of Lofton. Can they
really afford to re-sign Lofton, Maddux and Glavine ? And of the 3
I'd take Lofton and Maddux if I can only have 2. If they let Lofton
walk and keep the 2 pitchers, I think they're taking a big gamble.
Sure, pitching is 90% of the game. But pitching is also a gamble,
especially with aging pitchers. It's good these guys are finesse
guys and don't rely on their fastball.
Justice is clearly a salary dump. If he's healthy I think he'll
enjoy success in the AL.
Cleveland definitely helped their offense. But pitching is *still*
their problem.
|
63.3164 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Wed Mar 26 1997 14:04 | 3 |
|
Pitching is still their problem? I think you better go look at the
numbers again.
|
63.3165 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Mar 26 1997 17:27 | 5 |
|
Someone mentioned park effects and Atlanta. What is the concensus
on the new ball park? Will it be a hitters park or a pitchers park?
Ron
|
63.3166 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Mar 27 1997 08:26 | 5 |
|
Given the elevation of Atlanta (highest park above sea level until
the Rockies entered the league), it's likely to end up a hitter's park.
Joe
|
63.3167 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Any day now.... | Thu Mar 27 1997 09:12 | 4 |
| I'll let you know after this weekend when the first exhibition games
(vs the Yankmees) are played. Speculation is that its a hitter park.
UMDan
|
63.3168 | Two best GMs in the game | RTOMS::SHERMANS | The former MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Thu Mar 27 1997 10:41 | 41 |
| What a perfect example of a trade that helps both teams. Cleveland does
away with the uncertainty that will surround Lofton the entire season and
replaces him with the center fielder who most nearly approaches him in
value. Justice should fit in as well, though I agree he was not a vital
element. I think Giles is probably ready, and that means the Indians may
very well not be done dealing.
Atlanta is definitely a one-year stop for Lofton, who expect Andrew Jones
to be their regular center fielder starting in 1998. At that time, not
burdened by the contracts of Lofton, Justice, or Grissom, there will be
enough money to pay both Maddux and Glavine what the market says they're
worth (hint: more than John Smoltz). And they get the lefty they need
for the bullpen. And just perhaps Andrew Jones (who last I looked was
not setting Florida on fire) gets a chance to mature for half a season
in Triple A.
John Hart and John Schuerholz are geniuses.
In .3163 yesterday Joe G. wrote:
>especially with aging pitchers. It's good these guys are finesse
>guys and don't rely on their fastball.
Actually, numerous studies have shown that power pitchers last longer
than junkballers. Presumably the breaking stuff puts more wear and
tear on the elbow and shoulder.
Maddux turns 31 next month, Glavine turned 31 two days ago. These are
not yet "aging" pitchers. And both of them are athletes and take care
of themselves. If there are any two pitchers in the game I'd take a
chance on, it's these two.
And strictly speaking, Maddux at least *does* rely on his fastball. It's
not one of those 97 MPH heaters that get all the attention, rather it
comes in at about 90, and he throws it (I would guess) at least 80% of
the time. The thing is that he can put it on either edge of the plate
and he can make it tail in either direction. When he's on, he is as
unhittable as any pitcher in the game, but since he's not blowing people
away, it's hard to figure how he does it.
Steve
|
63.3169 | bring back the "ol' loopty loo" | BRLLNT::LONG | Taxation without representation | Thu Mar 27 1997 11:37 | 19 |
| >And strictly speaking, Maddux at least *does* rely on his fastball.
>It's not one of those 97 MPH heaters that get all the attention,
>rather it comes in at about 90, and he throws it (I would guess)
>at least 80% of the time. The thing is that he can put it on
>either edge of the plate and he can make it tail in either direction.
Steve, this is one of the 90's nuances of baseball that really
makes little sense to me. IMHO a "fastball" (aka heater) is a
straight pitch with everything you can muster behind it. Obviously
a good pitcher can place the heater to cross the plate where ever
he wants. If the pitch "tails" then it should be called on a
"curveball" (aka funny-one).
All the latest names for pitches that break differently are
really variations of the curveball. They only seem to confuse
the likes of myself.
billl
|
63.3170 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Mar 27 1997 12:42 | 10 |
| a fastball does not have to be straight. 5 people can grip the ball
exactly the same and you could have 5 different movements on the ball.
Many righthanded pitcher's "fastball" tails in and vice versa for
lefty's. If it's your hardest pitch, that's your fastball.
BTW who would want to throw a straight pitch besides the batter....
Jimbo
|
63.3171 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Mar 27 1997 13:21 | 19 |
|
> Steve, this is one of the 90's nuances of baseball that really
> makes little sense to me. IMHO a "fastball" (aka heater) is a
> straight pitch with everything you can muster behind it.
Yeah, I have to disagree with this too. The straight fastball with
little or no movement on it is an accident waiting to happen, always
has been, and always will be. The difference in movement was the
difference between the 100+ mph fastballs of Goose Gossage and Rob
Dibble. Gossage had it, Dibble didn't.
And there's no mistaking any kind of fastball, or even slider, with the
honest-to-goodness curveball. 'Course you don't see many of those
anymore either (between Gordon and Sele the Red Sox have almost
cornered the market).
glenn
|
63.3172 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Mar 27 1997 13:25 | 30 |
| I agree with Jimbo. I've heard many people say that the movement on a
fastball is more important that the speed.
From what I've heard, the big difference between fastball movement and a
curve or slider is the direction of the spin. A curve or slider spins in a way
that causes a pitch from a rightie to break from right to left. Visa versa for
a leftie. A tailing fast ball usually goes the other way, left to right for a
rightie.
Also, fastball spin creates lift on the ball rather than forcing it to drop
hence the "rising fastball". It doesn't really rise it just drops slower than
the batter expects creating an "exploding" effect as it crosses the plate.
It seems that from a right handed pitchers point of view the spin would
push the ball in the following way:
__
/|\ /| /
| / /
| / |/__
"Rising" Tailing "Breaking"
Fastball Fastball pitch
"Explodes" Drifts in Down and
on the on a right away from
batter handed btr a rightie
Reverse for lefties,
George
|
63.3173 | How many can you name? | BRLLNT::LONG | Taxation without representation | Thu Mar 27 1997 14:13 | 9 |
| Glad to see I can actually find something a few of you
can agree on. ;^)
I beef wasn't what the pitches did, it was with the myriad
of names that seem to have litteraly poped up in the last
ten years.
billl
|