T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
61.1 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | A2 brings out the hypocrites | Thu Jan 14 1993 09:44 | 4 |
| Shouldn't be to hard as long as they don't choke like other teams
from the central.
Tim
|
61.2 | | MKFSA::LONG | "just keep it between the lines" | Thu Jan 14 1993 11:58 | 7 |
| Tim,
One thing about choking on the old chicken bone...
At least the one choking was invited to the table to eat!
Bill
|
61.3 | Bernie...back to number 1 in 93 | LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Thu Jan 14 1993 13:48 | 7 |
|
If I was going to choke....I wouldn't have gone in the first place.
The writting was on the wall!
WOOF!
|
61.4 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Squeelers = Loser Girly Mons | Thu Jan 14 1993 15:58 | 29 |
|
>> <<< Note 61.0 by LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR "CaVs will win it all!" >>>
>> -< CLEVELAND BROWNS 'DAWGS' >-
>> QUOTE FROM ART MODEL: We have gone long enough...3 years...
>> The Browns will not miss the playoffs this year!
>> The Browns will win a division title within 3 years!
>> The Browns will get the home field advantage throughout the
>>playoffs within 3 years!
>> OR
>> "I will sell the team and move out of town."
Well, HAL, at least ya only got to wait three years before you get a
REAL owner who may not meddle, eh???
ANd only 7-100 years to get the 'Spots in the Super Bowl.
JaKe
|
61.5 | Browns will be in the playoffs this year! | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Fri Jan 15 1993 10:05 | 31 |
|
If Art would ever leave the team, I would not be very happy. I happen
to think Art is one of the better owners in this league. We have
always put out a good team, even their worst of teams arn't that bad.
Now, lets look at the owners of the Pats......on second thought....no,
lets not.
An interesting stat - Even though the Browns have not made the
playoffs in their last three years, they still lead the entire NFL
with post season appearences. And to beat that, they have been in
the league less years than the teams that are tied with them...ie -
Giants and Rams.
Art has vowed to be *VERY* active in this years free agency. Look
for the Browns to pick up some offensive linemen.
The Browns will also be looking at who will get the ball in the
backfield.....Vardell or Hoard.
The Browns will go with Bernie Kosar no matter what. He *is*
expected to have a full recovery from the surgery.
Art has expressed a *major* concern for BB to do something about
the offense this year...expect it to get done! It has been listed
as his top priority this year.
I'll post the artical about the state of the Browns next week.
WOOF!
|
61.6 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Jan 15 1993 10:08 | 12 |
| > An interesting stat - Even though the Browns have not made the
> playoffs in their last three years, they still lead the entire NFL
> with post season appearences. And to beat that, they have been in
> the league less years than the teams that are tied with them...ie -
> Giants and Rams.
Probably the best statement one could make in light of this is
Yeah, but what have you done for me lately......
8^)
|
61.7 | sign'em up Art | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Sat Jan 23 1993 09:15 | 13 |
|
Word comming out of New York is that the Browns will sign
Reggie White.....
Good move Cleveland!
Go Dawgs!
WOOF!
|
61.8 | Reggie has the final say. | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've Got Three Knees!! | Sat Jan 23 1993 14:32 | 3 |
| Hahahahahah. Yea Right. He wants to go to a winner. Not another
pretender. *:^)
|
61.9 | STATE OF THE 'ART' | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:03 | 39 |
|
In front of more than 50 reporters, six television cameras and a
live radio audience Dec. 30, Art Modell held one of his most
entertaining and informative "State of the Browns" press conferences.
And at the same time, gave Coach Bill Belichick a ringing endorsement
and gave himself an ultimatum.
Modell spoke and fielded questions strongly and cadidly for close
to an hour. The conference focused on four topics:
1. He expects the team to win at least a division title and
homefield advantage in the playoffs before Head Coach Bill Belichick's
contract expires after the 1995 season, and if it doesn't happen, he
pledged he will give up control of the Browns.
"I'll make this statement. I'm putting myself on the spot by
saying this, but I'm so positive of Bill Belichick's future here and
that of the Cleveland Browns' organization, that if we don't get the
job done by the end of his contract, I will get out of football and
leave Cleveland. I'm so positive he's going to do it I'm not going to
be looking for new excuses.
"He's the last head coach I hired. I will not hire another head
coach. That's how positive, how comfortable I am. If you know him as
well as I do, and I know he's not the easiest guy to get to know. I
mean, he's no Don Rickles, let's face it."
The "Don Rickles" remark referred to Belichick's reputation as
stoic and taciturn.
Modell was asked if the Browns had to reach the Super Bowl to meet
his goal.
"I avoided saying that because I could see a headline, 'Modell:
Super Bowl 1998 or Bust.' All I can say is I expect this franchise to
be an elite NFL franchise this city will be proud of. I don't want to
put a label on what success means. We all know what success is, but I
have my own designs and ambitions. But if I can't get the job done
with Bill, I gave you the alternative.
"I will say it'll take more than a wild-card spot to make me happy.
My first goal is to get back into the playoffs with homefield
advantage. That's how you get ahead in this business."
WOOF!!
|
61.10 | STATE OF THE 'ART' | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:09 | 22 |
|
2. Modell's convinced more than ever Belichick is the coach to
lead the Browns to a championship.
"I interviewed Bill Belichick in February 1991 and before I hired
him I had an awfully good feeling I'd hired the right man. A year
later we were 6-10, and I was supremely confident I had found the right
man. A year later, at 7-9, I'm absolutely positive, beyond any measure
of doubt, I have a winning coach who's going to bring the Browns back
to where (they belong), and very soon, too.
"I've seen the man operate under adverse conditions. I've seen the
man bounce off the mat after one disastrous loss after another that
took the heart out of the organization, especially after the (Dec. 27)
Oilers game. I feel very, very good about the future. I'm more
optimistic about the Cleveland Browns today than I've been in a long,
long time.
"Bill has an absolute passion for winning. He shares my passion
for winning. He shares the core players on this team's feeling for
winning.
WOOF!!!
|
61.11 | STATE OF THE 'ART' | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:18 | 32 |
|
3. Modell said the offense and offensive corrdinator situation was
the top priority for the off-season:
"We have started the process of evaluating the entire organization,
like we do every year. Our offense, the scheme, the design,
coordination - call it what you want - will be given top priority. I
have my own personal views, which I haven't even shared with Bill, and
I owe him the courtesy of sharing it with him first."
Modell inferred Bilichick should delegate more of the offensive
load.
"Bill didn't come in charge of the offense," Modell said. "He came
in charge of the whole team. If there's a deficiency there, we'll
correct it, we'll cure it. I didn't hire him as an offensive
coordinator. In fact, I don't believe in that. The great head coaches
delegated authority and stayed in their supervisory position.
"He wasn't hired as an offensive coordinator. Let me suffice to
say, we will have a more organized approach to the offensive side of
the ball in some form, some fashion, in 1993."
Modell was asked what his reaction would be if Belichick doesn't
want an offensive coordinator or tries to keep the present offensive
scheme as is.
"I would want him to explain to me why we don't need somebody,"
Modell said. "It would be a hard sale."
One of the first moves Belichick has made reguarding the offense is
to hire a new line coach. Hal Hunter will not be back with the Browns
and it is expected a coach will be hired who has more run-blocking
expertise.
WOOF!
|
61.12 | STATE OF THE 'ART' | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:24 | 21 |
|
4. Modell vowed to make relations between the team and media
better. This is significant because there's been an increasingly
widened gap between the Browns and local media in recent years.
"I want to offer a New Year's resolution and apologize to members
of the media for any things we did to offend you last year. I want to
pledge that a new slate will begin in 1993 and, in a reciprocal way, I
would hope you would clean the slate, and I accept your apologies. My
intent is to change some of our rules regarding our media relations.
Hopefully, I have some ideas that'll make your job easier in covering
us and in making us more accessible without interfering with the
progress we want to make."
Modell indicated he thinks Belichick will give more direct answers
to reporters' questions in the future.
"You people (reporters) are entitled to forthrightness and candor.
He might not tell you everything, but he should try to make your job
easier."
WOOF!
|
61.13 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | take me to Roslyn Cafe | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:27 | 5 |
| awfully big of Art to accept their apologies......
mike_who_thinks_this_State of the "Art"_belongs in note 27....
;^)
|
61.14 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:48 | 11 |
| Let's see.
6-10, 7-9.....
At that rate, it'll be another three years before you can begin to
think about a division title, and four or five before you can start
to think about homefield......
8^)
|
61.15 | Just ask Art is next... | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Tue Jan 26 1993 09:31 | 8 |
|
Hearing Art and hoping what he says, he does, really pumps you up.
I *do* expect to see the Browns in the playoffs this comming year.
3 years is long enough!
WOOF!
|
61.16 | Thanks Ozzie! | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Wed Feb 10 1993 08:06 | 10 |
|
The great Ozzie Newsome has been promoted to Assistant Offensive
Coach yesterday. Its truely great that the Browns have kept Ozzie
with the team. I haven't heard if the Browns have signed an offensive
coordinator yet but with the title of Assistant Coach, one can only
think there is/will be one.
WOOF!
|
61.17 | Official Title | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Wed Feb 10 1993 10:09 | 9 |
|
In the paper I just read....Ozzie Newsome....Assistant (to the head
coach) of the offense. Could this actually be the move Art really
wanted??? I don't know. Not sure how Ozzie will change the offensive
scheme of things. Just hope he does. Would be nice to see him
succeed!
WOOF!
|
61.18 | huh? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Wed Feb 10 1993 12:30 | 8 |
| So just what does this mean Hal? Does this mean he is the offensive
coordinator or just another coach? Assistant (to the head coach) of
the offense means nothing to me unless I'm just missing something here.
REgardless, does this mean that they will win the division this
year?
Tim
|
61.19 | Not going to predict the title but at least a wild card! | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Wed Feb 10 1993 13:27 | 14 |
|
Tim,
If you read the prior notes on the State of the Art.....
Art said that there would be a change in the way the Browns run their
offense. Last year, Bill B. ran the show on offense. Now, they have
made Ozzie his assistant for the offense. What that means or how much
of a role Ozzie will play in the design of the offense is still a
question in my mind. Sure, Ozzie knows receivers....but....does he
know quarterbacks and runningbacks? Art said he wanted changes.....
I'm sure there will be more to hear on this deal...
WOOF!
|
61.20 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Bye Larry, And bye Moe & Curly, Too!! | Wed Feb 10 1993 15:39 | 9 |
| I just heard that Bernice has been promoted to assistant coach of
urinal scrubbers after the game at Clevescum's Municipal Sewage dump,
er Staduium. He says it will keep his throwing/scrub brush arm in
terrific shape.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
61.21 | Why do you do it??? | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Thu Feb 11 1993 09:51 | 7 |
|
Yea, Right....and your the one who has that job at Squibburg Rust
Bucket.
Grrrrrrr!
|
61.22 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | BreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F U | Thu Feb 11 1993 15:42 | 5 |
| Nah, don't do it anymore, Hal, had enuf of it during my 4 years in the
Air Farce, though.
JaKe
|
61.23 | Shaw AFB, SC | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Fri Feb 12 1993 11:06 | 11 |
|
Kind of funny you should mention the Air Force...while I was in basic
training...I think the first day. The TI was handing out duties for
everyone and he asks.....Is there anyone here who bowls? Boy, I
thought this was great...I love to bowl...I'll get on his good side...
So, I raised my hand along with one other guy. The TI says...good, you
two get to clean the toilet bowls....every morning. Needless to say,
I don't volenteer for anything anymore.
WOOF!
|
61.24 | How about some help... | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Tue Feb 16 1993 10:36 | 11 |
|
The Browns have hired the head coach from Maine. I don't know much
about this new Browns coach.....does anyone in here know something
about the Maine football team? The head coach was hired as the Browns
offensive line coach. Does Maine have a good running attack? Thats
what I would guess. Living up to Art's objective by getting offensive
help.
WOOF! (wag, wag, wag)
|
61.25 | | CAMONE::WAY | J. Edgar -- G-man wearin' a G-string | Tue Feb 16 1993 10:46 | 10 |
| > Living up to Art's objective by getting offensive
> help.
You have to be very careful getting offensive help. The paying customers
might not like to be offended.....
8^)
|
61.26 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Wed Feb 17 1993 13:54 | 5 |
| I also saw in the paper yesterday that the browns hired an offensive
assistant. I thought that was Ozzie's job? More coaches must mean
more wins?
Tim
|
61.27 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Wed Feb 17 1993 14:19 | 8 |
|
In recent Maine - Northeastern games, Maine put up a decent air attack.
Then again Northeastern had no pass defense (they did have a passive
defense though)
I wasn't impressed though.
Marc
|
61.28 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Hope ya starve, Jesse!! | Wed Feb 17 1993 15:48 | 8 |
| I cain see it now, in a couple of months we'll hear that line about the
'Spots having 12,286 assistant coaches and being a shoe-in to win the
AFC Central this year.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
61.29 | I guess I'm still hearing those words from years past. | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | CaVs will win it all! | Fri Feb 19 1993 10:32 | 13 |
|
Come on guys.....The way I look at it is.....the Browns know they
have a problem with the offense no scoring enough points and the lack
of a *real* running attack/blocking scheme. So, the Browns have begun
to address the problem. This guy from Maine seems like a nobody but,
I'll bet his team improved offensively durring his term there.
Evidently this other guy the Browns got as offensive assistant is
the assistant to Ozzie.
At least the Browns arn't just sitting around doing nothing. Like
other teams I know.....ie: Squeelers.
WOOF!
|
61.30 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Fri Feb 19 1993 12:48 | 6 |
| 3 offensive assistants sounds like the need for some right guard;^)
What your saying by stating that you bet the offense gets better with
this guy from Maine is that it can't be any worse?
Tim
|
61.31 | Bernie in trouble | SKEWED::MCKAY | | Fri Feb 19 1993 12:52 | 6 |
| I don't know how long the coach from Maine was there, but lately
Maine's offense has been a good one. Their QB Mike Buck is holding
the clipboard somewhere in the NFL (New Orleans maybe?). Could it be
the end of Bernie. College coach trades for his college QB??? 8*)
Jimbo
|
61.32 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | See if We care if ya starve, Jesse!! | Fri Feb 19 1993 15:53 | 18 |
|
>> At least the Browns arn't just sitting around doing nothing. Like
>>other teams I know.....ie: Squeelers.
HAL, the STEELERS went thru a complete change of coaching staff one
short year ago, and the change in the team was glaring, having fone
from 7-9 the year before to 11-5 this past year. Changes in the
coaching staff aren't necessary at this point. The team is now working
on getting the players that fit into the team plans, and unlike the
final years of the Noll era, they're adapting the offensive and
defensive schemes to fit the players they have, not trying to get the
players to change to fit the systems.
Next season will be a major test because the STEELERS have to play a
division winners type schedule.
JaKe
|
61.33 | should hear something soon. | JUNCO::WHITEHAIR | Mark Price = 3 pt ace! | Sat Mar 27 1993 10:14 | 8 |
|
No word out of the Browns headquarters reguarding the Regie White
deal.........Still think they are in the hunt. Can't see Regie going
to the Jets.
WOOF!
|
61.34 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | I met the Monstah | Sat Mar 27 1993 20:49 | 19 |
| >> <<< Note 61.33 by JUNCO::WHITEHAIR "Mark Price = 3 pt ace!" >>>
>> -< should hear something soon. >-
>> No word out of the Browns headquarters reguarding the Regie White
>>deal.........Still think they are in the hunt. Can't see Regie going
>>to the Jets.
The Steelers haven't gotten into the Reggie Sweepstakes, but Why would
Reggie even consider Clevescum??? I mean, Philly, as far as cities
goes nowadays, sucks bigtime, so why would he want to move to
Clevescum, the world's only inhabitated raw sewage dump????? Maybe
they ate the 'Spots cain fergit about signing Testicleverde and sign
Brister away from the STEELERS and finally have somebody who'll out do
Bernice.
JaKe
(8^)*
|
61.36 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Like a Fresh of Breath air! | Mon Mar 29 1993 22:32 | 3 |
| >> Testicleverde
Green filberts?! :-)
|
61.37 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Cmon baby,finish what you started | Thu Apr 01 1993 21:37 | 5 |
| Another Miahami QB on the browns squad, and no Hal?
Must be on vacation!
Tim
|
61.38 | The Bernie & Vinny show... | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | Mark Price = 3 pt ace! | Fri Apr 02 1993 08:59 | 14 |
|
Yes, thats right Tim,
Testiverdi has signed a one year contract with an option
year.
I think this is great! Venny will work well with the
Browns. We all know how injury prone Bernie is.... The word
out of camp is that there is no question that Bernie is the
starter and he has been told so by BB. Venny has no quarms about
it either. He knows he will get some playing time.
Good move by the Browns!
WOOF!
|
61.39 | | CAM3::WAY | RIP #7 | Fri Apr 02 1993 09:36 | 12 |
| > Testiverdi has signed a one year contract with an option
Hal, if he's gonna be your new QB, learn how to spell his name.
TestAverdE...... (which probably means green head in italian.....)
'Saw
PS Now Cleveland has TWO loser QBs.....8^)
|
61.40 | No longer will one man be to BLAM... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Apr 02 1993 11:18 | 1 |
|
|
61.41 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Apr 02 1993 12:57 | 6 |
| � No word out of the Browns headquarters reguarding the Regie White
� deal.........Still think they are in the hunt. Can't see Regie going
� to the Jets.
Reggie has stated he wants to play for a winner. Given that I can't
imagine him ending up in either New Jersey or Ohio.
|
61.42 | | CAMONE::WAY | RIP #7 | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:10 | 14 |
| |� No word out of the Browns headquarters reguarding the Regie White
|� deal.........Still think they are in the hunt. Can't see Regie going
|� to the Jets.
|
| Reggie has stated he wants to play for a winner. Given that I can't
| imagine him ending up in either New Jersey or Ohio.
Reggie White's agent was on WFAN yesterday, and he gave the "short list".
Cleveland was not on it. Neither were the NY Giants.
'Saw
|
61.43 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Guess who just got back today... | Fri Apr 02 1993 13:59 | 3 |
| Reggie didn't say he wants to play for a current winner. I thought he
said he wanted to go somewhere with a commitment to win...
|
61.44 | | CAMONE::WAY | RIP #7 | Fri Apr 02 1993 14:05 | 26 |
| > Reggie didn't say he wants to play for a current winner. I thought he
> said he wanted to go somewhere with a commitment to win...
Reggie's waitin' on God to tell him where to play (as if God ain't
busy enough down there in Waco, right?)
So, then Reggie's wanting to go to some place where he can do some
inner city work, and he wants to go to a winner, and he wants this
and he wants that.
If I were Reggie, I'd pick where I want to play, and then let
God guide me to where the inner city work is. I mean, God's busy,
he ain't got time to be looking at Tourism Guides for the NFL cities.
By the time Reggie's done with picking the city, then God should have
stuff wrapped up in Waco, and he can probably squeeze Reggie in
between lunch with the Dali Lama, and working on Boznia.
That's my cut at it......
'Saw
|
61.45 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Apr 02 1993 14:07 | 4 |
| What if God's busy and doesn't tell Reggie who to play for before
the draft?
/Don
|
61.46 | | CAMONE::WAY | RIP #7 | Fri Apr 02 1993 14:16 | 19 |
| > What if God's busy and doesn't tell Reggie who to play for before
> the draft?
My guess would be that Reggie would have to make his own choice.
It's kind of like in the last blizzard we had. I was waiting for my
regular plow guy to come and plow my driveway. At 5pm Sunday afternoon
the plow guy called and said "all my trucks are out of order -- transmissions
are burned out -- you'll have to make other arrangements".
Here, I'd been waiting for the plow guy (God) to come and plow me (pick
the city I'm gonna play in) and then he was unable to. So I had
to make other arrangements (Reggie will have to take a chance, grab
his cojones, and pick a place).
hth,
'Saw
|
61.47 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Empty Space | Fri Apr 02 1993 20:18 | 12 |
|
>> I think this is great! Venny will work well with the
>> starter and he has been told so by BB. Venny has no quarms about
Uh, Er, EARTH TO HAL!!!!! It's V I N N Y, not Venny. And the lasted
name is TesticleVerdi.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
61.48 | unrestricted | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Jul 06 1993 09:03 | 9 |
|
The Browns sign Hessian Jones from the Vikes...
A little help for the receivers....
WOOF!
|
61.49 | | CAMONE::WAY | Washin' the dog, washin' the dog | Tue Jul 06 1993 09:30 | 5 |
| > The Browns sign Hessian Jones from the Vikes...
Hessian? What a name. The guy must be a terror on the field!
|
61.50 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Jul 06 1993 12:19 | 1 |
| Hassan, I tink.
|
61.51 | He's just in it for the money 'Saw... | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Imus is coming to Boston | Tue Jul 06 1993 13:02 | 1 |
|
|
61.52 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Intel Inside, again! | Tue Jul 06 1993 13:26 | 2 |
|
The Hessian is coming, The Hessian is coming!
|
61.53 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Fresh off a week of I & I | Mon Jul 19 1993 20:48 | 8 |
| The anticipation of the annual "HAL" prediction is killing me.
When we gonna get it, Hal???
JaKe
|
61.54 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Jul 20 1993 00:04 | 4 |
| uh JaKe why the anticipation; it'll be the same as every year.
The Crazy Met
|
61.55 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey and Melanie have a new house... | Tue Jul 20 1993 00:11 | 3 |
| I'll beat him to the punch:
WOOF, WOOF OOOOWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOO
|
61.56 | :^) | GENRAL::WADE | MyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWent | Tue Jul 20 1993 10:17 | 5 |
|
Can someone please tell me the Browns record in AFC championship
games against the Broncos. Thanks......
Claybone
|
61.57 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Tue Jul 20 1993 10:23 | 8 |
| Hey, I read in USA Today that the Browns have more kickoff tees than any other
team in the NFL! This poves they will win it all! Goes with all them
coaches and weight equipment. I heard a rumour that they are 3 wet towells
away from replacing the Bengals as the team with most towells!
WOOOOOOOFFFFFFFF
JD_as_Hal
|
61.58 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I like mine with french fried potatoes | Tue Jul 20 1993 10:51 | 1 |
| Kevin Mack retired yesterday. Who's their RB? Vardell and Metcalf?
|
61.59 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Yes,Calgon took her away! | Tue Jul 20 1993 12:08 | 7 |
| They don't have a RB;^)
Why did Mack retire anyway? Did he coke it up again?
Hal oh Hal, where are thow?
Tim
|
61.60 | Go dawgs! PLAYOFFS FOR SURE! | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Jul 20 1993 15:24 | 54 |
|
I also was very surprised about Kevin Mack retireing....didn't
really expect it. I guess it was a very emotional speech. Wish I
could have seen it.
About those Browns.............Yes, YES, this is their year!
The Browns will make the playoffs this year.
Improvement throughout the team.....great free agency signings!
QB- Bernie is in great health! Picked up Testiverde who will be
a great backup. Pillcox is still there too.
RB- Tommy Vardell, Leroy Hoard and Eric Metcalf. I think Baldwin
is still around too. Both Leroy and Eric signed big 3 year
contracts and are actually happy to be in training camp early.
WR- Look for lawyer Tillman to be the big man this year along with
Hassan Jones, Mark Carrier and Michael Jackson. This area is the
most improved. Forgot about Patric Rowe.
OL- Another area which has been greatly improved this year. They
say, in Cleveland, that when the Browns got rid of ... ... dam, I
can't remember his name right now, but anyway, when they got rid of
this guy, the OL line improved three fold. Says alot for the depth
last year...anyway, with the 1st round signing and some big
pickups in free agency, Bernie will be protected!
Can you believe it....
I said....
BERNIE WILL BE PROTECTED!!!!!
I will update you on the defense in the next couple of days......
Mike Johnson signed a one year contract with the Browns
and is VERY happy! So are the Browns!
WOOF! WOOF!
THIS WILL BE THE BEST TEAM IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS
GO DAWGS!
|
61.61 | Buncha nobodies | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey and Melanie have a new house... | Tue Jul 20 1993 16:38 | 4 |
| Yea, Vardell, Hoard Tillman Jones, all names that would strike fear
into my heart if I were a defensive player...
=Bob=
|
61.62 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Fresh off a week of I & I | Tue Jul 20 1993 16:50 | 8 |
|
>> BERNIE WILL BE PROTECTED!!!!!
What, somebody give hime a case of Trojans?????
JaKe
|
61.63 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Yes,Calgon took her away! | Tue Jul 20 1993 20:32 | 11 |
| Hal, You woulda loved the interview with Bernie. He almost broke
down in tears!!!
Here is an excuse for the browns stinking (if they still do):
Mack retired and everyone was to emotionally distraught to play to
their full potential.
Your Welcome,
Tim
|
61.64 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Fresh off a week of I & I | Fri Jul 23 1993 17:04 | 9 |
| Hey, did Michael Dean Perry return today or is he still moping about
something Belichick said to him after practice the other day?
What, did Belichick tell him he could only have 11 helpings at the team
dinner that night??
JaKe
|
61.65 | BAD DAWG WANTS OUT | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Mon Jul 26 1993 09:45 | 11 |
|
The deal with Perry.......he doesn't like the defensive scheme of
things......he want to be able to do what he wants on the line......
go after the quarterback. but, Bill wants him to stay put. This has
been a problem since the two have played together. This is Perry's
final year on his contract and he has been getting fined $4,000 a day
for not showing up. Will he resign with the Browns for next year.....
doubtfull.
WOOF!
|
61.66 | can't remember the score..... | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Aug 10 1993 12:02 | 17 |
|
preseason game #1 vs Washington...
If this game showed anything at all, it was the Browns weakness....
the secondary!
Bernie looked lost.....
Vinnie looked good.....
Touchdown Tommy got two touchdowns and looked good.....
defensive line looked good.....
offensive line looked better.....
special teams.....SUCKED!
WOOF!
|
61.67 | | USCTR1::KING | Key West, where the fun begins....... | Tue Aug 10 1993 12:45 | 4 |
| 41-12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!a BLOW-OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
REK
|
61.68 | WAIT TILL REGULAR SEASON | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Aug 10 1993 14:26 | 5 |
|
No, No, No..........a freebee.
WOOF!
|
61.69 | arf? arf? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's gonna wear maternity clothes! | Fri Aug 13 1993 10:39 | 8 |
| Oh Hal.....
Any woids o' wisdom regarding tomorrow night's Patriot - Dawg game?
I remain,
seeing if dawgbones will get lodged?
Kev
|
61.70 | Browns dominate | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Fri Aug 13 1993 10:55 | 18 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
Yes Kev,
Don't bet on the Pats! You will see a mainly Brown fan
attendance. Should be interesting....
WOOF!
|
61.71 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's gonna wear maternity clothes! | Fri Aug 13 1993 10:59 | 2 |
| nice graphics.......
|
61.72 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | squished tomatoes | Fri Aug 13 1993 12:51 | 4 |
|
It's a picture of Hal's last date.
brews
|
61.73 | rollward!!!!! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's gonna wear maternity clothes! | Fri Aug 13 1993 13:04 | 5 |
| dammit brews, I just blew my lunch on my screen!
;^)
|
61.74 | Browns win one... | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Mon Aug 16 1993 08:31 | 31 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
Browns take preseason game #2 from the Pats.....12-9.
Good running game by the Browns.
Excelent defensive line!
Better Safety coverage.
Bernie looked better.
Vinnie looked no better than Bernie.
Metcalf was great!
Score should have beaten the Pats by more but because of the
offensive problem, getting the ball in the endzone...the score
was close. The Browns dominated much of the game.
WOOF!
|
61.75 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Aug 16 1993 11:57 | 4 |
| sounds like that game was one of the most boring games in NFL
history.
The Crazy Met
|
61.76 | I KNOW I'VE SEEN WORSE... | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Mon Aug 16 1993 16:34 | 23 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
Pats /
/\^^^^^^ @#&*@~
\_______________
Your right Crazy.....very borring.....not much exciting happened.
The guys I had over the house did cheer when Bernie got sacked...
to them, that was excitement. To me, its nothing new. Ya get
used to it. Then again...when your watching 3 and 4 and 5th string
players....what do you really expect?
WOOF!
|
61.77 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Mon Aug 16 1993 16:38 | 14 |
|
>> used to it. Then again...when your watching 3 and 4 and 5th string
>> players....what do you really expect?
Sheeeeeeeeeiiit,
Up ther in Clevescum, all season long all they get to watch playing
fer the Brown(spot)s(tm) are 3rd, 4th, and 5th string players, compared
to everybody else's team!
(8^0
JaKe
|
61.78 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Aug 17 1993 12:50 | 2 |
| After the game the Pats and Browns swapped players. The Browns got a
linebacker in exchange for a nose tackle.
|
61.79 | IS THAT RIGHT... | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Aug 17 1993 13:38 | 16 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
>>>>>>>>>>Jake / ____
/\^^^^^^ Fake>>>>>>>> / \
\_______________ |JAKE| PEEEYOU!
\____/
Jake, we will see who gets the last laugh this year.....I hear that the
squeelers can't figure out who to start at QB.....O'Donald or the
Cleveland cast off.......4th stringer...this year....
|
61.80 | | MKFSB::LONG | All gave some, some gave all | Tue Aug 17 1993 14:31 | 6 |
| Some absorootry mind boggling graphics there, Hal! I like it
better when you just enter words that don't make any sense.
billl
|
61.81 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real mans sport is starting! | Wed Aug 18 1993 13:14 | 1 |
| billl, are you telling us you don't know what arf arf means?:~))
|
61.82 | | MKFSB::LONG | All gave some, some gave all | Wed Aug 18 1993 13:42 | 8 |
| >> billl, are you telling us you don't know what arf arf means?:~))
sure that's the sound of an ankle-biting, annoying resemblance
of a dog. Now WOOF WOOF, that's an entirly different story.
But then again, I don't want to get REK all cranked up again.
billl
|
61.83 | Browns 27 - Cats 14 | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Sep 07 1993 10:51 | 30 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
Bengals>>>>>>>/
/\^^^^^^ >>>>>>>pussy cats
\_______________
The Dawgs did it! Game one is a win! Awsome Defense!
Bernie did a good job and should have had better stats if it wasn't
for a couple of dropped passes...big ones too.
Touchdown Tommy got his first Pro TD. A one yard run at the end of
the first half. He looked good! Something like 69 yards on the
day.
Michael Jackson changed his name to Dyson and got 1 TD for the day.
The DAWG defense scored 6 sacks, 2 INT's and one fumble recovery
for a BIG TD. Only allowed 52 yards rushing on the day...most
comming in the 1st quarter. This defense is just totally down
right GREAT!
Don't be surprised to see the Browns beat the 49ers on Monday.
WOOF!
|
61.84 | | MKFSB::LONG | All gave some, some gave all | Tue Sep 07 1993 12:17 | 10 |
| >> Touchdown Tommy got his first Pro TD. A one yard run at the end of
>> the first half. He looked good! Something like 69 yards on the
>> day.
Don't know who "Touchdown Tommy" is, but the guy who scored the one
yard TD at the end of the half was Vardell, who, according to my paper,
gained 2 yards on 2 carries. Another HALism????
billl
|
61.85 | a Great Defense???? Think again | PFSVAX::JACOB | Oh, Woe is me!!! | Tue Sep 07 1993 12:46 | 19 |
|
>> The DAWG defense scored 6 sacks, 2 INT's and one fumble recovery
>> for a BIG TD. Only allowed 52 yards rushing on the day...most
>> comming in the 1st quarter. This defense is just totally down
>> right GREAT!
Yeah, sure HAL, right. Lessee how they do nexted week .vs. the 49ers,
then you might change yer tune.
That was the Lowly Bungholes the Brown(spot)s(tm) played this week, not
a REAL contender, or even a decent football team.
The STEELERS lost Sunday, but the defense rated about a B. The offense
again rated about a D+. They gave the 49ers excellent field position
too damned myuch in the firsted half, and dug themselves a hole they
couldn't get out of.
JaKe
|
61.86 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Tue Sep 07 1993 12:49 | 4 |
|
RE.84
What paper do you get, the sports edition of "My WEEKLY READER"????
|
61.87 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Oh, Woe is me!!! | Tue Sep 07 1993 12:51 | 4 |
| Vardell had 60 yards on 16 carries.
JaKe
|
61.88 | Spots on top 'o division | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen 592-5249 | Tue Sep 07 1993 13:32 | 7 |
| Amazing
Cleveland 1-0
Pittsburgh 0-1 "Clemson refs"
Houston 0-1
Cinncinatti 0-1
|
61.89 | | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Tue Sep 07 1993 13:39 | 2 |
|
Jake, TOMZAK is to BLAM!!!!!!!!!!!<
|
61.90 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Sep 07 1993 15:48 | 20 |
61.91 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:26 | 10 |
| re-.1
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Funniest note in here in a long time.
'Spots win their first, then go 5-10 the rest fo the season.
JaKe
|
61.92 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:37 | 13 |
|
>> Michael Jackson changed his name to Dyson and got 1 TD for the day.
Why, is he afraid that the kid accusing the OTHER Michael Jackson will
realize he's got the wrong one and finger him???
Or does he want his name to sound like his role model, Mike TYSON????
Inquiring mindless and all that sh_t
JaKe
|
61.93 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:38 | 4 |
| On a serious note, why did he change his name to Dyson?
'Saw
|
61.94 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hey... what's going on? | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:43 | 2 |
| "In tribute to his dad" is what I heard...
|
61.95 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:45 | 5 |
| SOunds like a load of BS to me, with the recent developments of the
one-gloved wonder.
JaKe
|
61.96 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:47 | 7 |
| > "In tribute to his dad" is what I heard...
I can understand that.....
'Saw
|
61.97 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real mans sport is starting! | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:51 | 3 |
| Is Hal in the Iceman's account?
Tim
|
61.98 | DYSON | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Sep 08 1993 08:44 | 29 |
|
Michael was mandated by the NFL to change his number or face
$10,000.00 a game fine so he changed his number from #1 to 81.
Evidently Michael's mom and dad were not married when michael
was born. They were married shortly thereafter but Michael never
had his name changed. He changed his name for his dad. To make
him proud of him.
ICEMAN.....definately an imposter!
I will now make a prediction.........The Browns will make it to
the playoffs with either a 9-7 wild card birth or a 10-6 Central
Division Title. Why??? the H-factor!
Clay Mathews received a standing ovation when the names of the
defensive players were announced at the beginning of the game Sunday.
Once again...I just have to say it...Great Defense last Sunday!
1st and goal from the one...and...the Dawgs...stop the Bengals
on four straight plays! Outstanding! We all went crazy!
Another great moment....4th and one from the one with 18 seconds
left on the clock before half. Bring in the big men.........Tommy
Vardel...Touchdown! All this infront of the DAWG POUND.
WOOF!
|
61.99 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Wed Sep 08 1993 10:15 | 23 |
| > Michael was mandated by the NFL to change his number or face
> $10,000.00 a game fine so he changed his number from #1 to 81.
Did he come into the league after they imposed that number rule?
I thought if you had a number that was "out of position" before that
rule, it got "grandfathered"....
> Clay Mathews received a standing ovation when the names of the
> defensive players were announced at the beginning of the game Sunday.
Clay Mathews is COOL.
Did Pepper play at all? Or did he sit out because he hasn't learned the
system yet?
'Saw
|
61.100 | and dat's da troof! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's gonna wear maternity clothes! | Wed Sep 08 1993 10:20 | 12 |
| >> Did Pepper play at all?
Naw, she's still scouring Hotlanta for her one true ACC_Chris, then
she'll play......
;^)
I remain,
missin dan'l too
Kev
|
61.101 | Pepper & Mack | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Sep 08 1993 11:00 | 10 |
|
Pepper Johnson played on special teams only. He will more than
likely play on defense this week against the 49ers. He will only
improve an already great front 7!
The word in Cleveland is that Keven Mack wants to come back and
play for the Browns. Art and the Browns arn't sure what they are going
to do.
WOOF!
|
61.102 | He's a boxer! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real mans sport is starting! | Wed Sep 08 1993 12:32 | 5 |
| Mack to come back and play again, after that tearful goodbye he had
with the "boys"..... Did this guy already coke up his $$$ or what?
Maybe thats why he quit in the 1st place.
Tim
|
61.103 | Hopefully...Mack won't be back. | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Sep 08 1993 13:24 | 13 |
|
To be honest, I feel that keven Mack should stay retired and
Touchdown Tommy do the work. Just think, if Vardell would have played
more last year, he would have been just that much better this year.
I say let TT have the job. Its not just that either....if the Browns
pick Mack back up...they have to drop an up and comming rb like
Baldwin. I say no! Keven did a great job when in his prime and I'll
give him credit for that...but this retire/unretire crap has got to
stop...not only in the NFL but in the NBA as well.
WOOF!
DAWGS TO EAT UP THE FOURTY-NINERS AT THE DAWG POUND!
|
61.104 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Wed Sep 08 1993 15:10 | 4 |
|
As one of 600 Bay Area Brown Backers I hope the Browns beat the
niners bad. People here have chased me around the office wanting a
piece of my wallet. I also want to see the niners bandwagon unload.
|
61.105 | DEFENSE! DEFENSE! DEFENSE! thats how its done! | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Thu Sep 09 1993 08:58 | 12 |
|
Hey dude.....Bay Area Brown Backers....???
I'm going to be in San Jose, not this weekend but the two weekends
thereafter. Are the Backers going down to LA for the game against the
Raiders??? Please let me know. I was thinking of pickig up a plane
from SF for the game on Sunday. Or, where do the backers meet for the
games? I'll need directions or a phone number to call.
Thanks in advance!
Hal
|
61.106 | helpful advice | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's gonna wear maternity clothes! | Thu Sep 09 1993 09:24 | 13 |
|
Hey Ron! (It's Ron, isn't it?) ;^)
Yabbut if ya try to call Hal, please remember to dial real S L O W !
(It makes it easier for him to deal with reality)
;^)
I remain,
a former terrorist of da valley myself!
Kev
|
61.107 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Sep 09 1993 12:22 | 40 |
61.108 | There was a ton of 'em | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Sep 09 1993 12:30 | 7 |
| -1,
Do the Brownies still meet at "Four's" Bar near North Station?
They did a few years back.
MikeL
|
61.109 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Thu Sep 09 1993 12:32 | 11 |
| > Do the Brownies still meet at "Four's" Bar near North Station?
> They did a few years back.
I thought Brownies were too young to drink.
Oh, oh, you mean the Back Bay Brown's fans!
'Saw
|
61.110 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Thu Sep 09 1993 13:28 | 13 |
|
re.105
The Bay Area Brown Backer are going to Seattle this year not L.A.
(who would want to go to L.A. on purpose anyway???) The viewing
site I go to is San Jose Live , this is a sports bar in the Downtown
area. The Bay Area Backers get there own section and the number is
408-291-2222. You coming out for training vacation or other????
Send mail for more info
Ron
|
61.111 | | ROYALT::ASHE | VP Secret Service codename -Buttafuoco | Thu Sep 09 1993 14:00 | 2 |
| I thought Fours was now Bills territory...
|
61.112 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:40 | 9 |
| LAtest trade rumor:
Gronowski to IBM fer 2 power cords and a broken down keypunch.
JaKe
|
61.113 | Mack to be back | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:45 | 5 |
| Kevin Mack will be rejoining the Browns. He's expected to rejoin the 53
man roster by the end of the month. No announcement was made about when
he might be on the active roster.
TTom
|
61.114 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | the ice bucket is full, melting fast | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:55 | 8 |
| re.113
I guess they need somebody to put down the white lines at Clevescum
Dump...er Municipal Stadium.....er, sorry, Mack's famous fer taking UP
white lines. I got cornfused.
JaKe
|
61.115 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Sep 09 1993 17:01 | 4 |
61.116 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | the ice bucket is full, melting fast | Thu Sep 09 1993 17:03 | 12 |
|
>><<< Note 61.115 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
>>re: .112
>>Trade rumor is false, IBM could not offer enough cash.
Translation: they wouldn't go above $10.
JaKe
|
61.117 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real mans sport is starting! | Thu Sep 09 1993 17:32 | 6 |
| San Jose Live? Watch out for them fruit (preserves) shots Hal.
Mixing those with Scotch on the rocks is deadly. Be sure you ask the
waitress if her finger is clean! Do one of them shots and you'll know
why I said that.
Tim
|
61.118 | AARRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!! | QUASER::HUNTER | How Do You Spell Win... G L Y N | Thu Sep 09 1993 19:23 | 15 |
|
Now I know why I almost didn't come back this year...
The
Groaner
Is
Bothersome
BG
|
61.119 | Browns 24 - 49ers 13 | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:55 | 14 |
|
Well guys, I won't be in tomorrow to brag about my Cleveland
Browns.
I just want to let you all know. I'll be in CA for the next
2.5 weeks and won't be returning till Oct 4th.
Later
Go DAWGS!!!
WOOF!
|
61.120 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Sep 13 1993 16:27 | 21 |
61.121 | Setting the table for... | ROCK::MURPHY | Illini in '93 | Mon Sep 13 1993 18:02 | 7 |
| This year is already starting to look like 86, 87, and 89, isn't it
Paul? Even with Danny Boy and Schottenheimer gone, the principals are
the same. Maybe with Wade in, the Broncs can win an extra one.
FWIW
Murph
|
61.122 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Another day in the Volcano | Mon Sep 13 1993 18:52 | 16 |
| Brown(spot)s(tm) .vs. 49ers tonite in the Mistake by the Lake,
Clevescum, the world's only inhabitated raw sewage dump. Playing on
the painted green surface of the CLevescum Municipal Sludge Dump.
Bernice will unveil a new brown/orange pair of Pumps, with a nice
chiffon playing skirt, and strapless top.
Gawd I love working second shift.
BTW, have the Dorks in the Pig Pound at the one end zone planned by
bringing batteries, coolers wif snow balls saved from last winter, etc.
for when the 49ers are entering the end zone for the 45th time in the
game???
JaKe
|
61.123 | | ROYALT::ASHE | WE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R. | Mon Sep 13 1993 23:35 | 2 |
| Browns up 20-13 at the half...
|
61.124 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Sep 14 1993 08:42 | 21 |
61.125 | | 38728::HUBER | File and Forget | Tue Sep 14 1993 09:48 | 15 |
|
A fun game to watch, that's for sure...
I'm still worried about the secondary, though. The O-line has
improved, but still looked shaky as well. I would have liked to
have seen more of the running game, as well...
On the other hand, the performance of the special teams was a very
pleasant surprise, and I liked the look of the D-line.
All in all, the Browns are about where I expected them to be - in line
for a playoff berth, but with enough holes left to prevent serious
contention for a Super Bowl victory.
Joe
|
61.126 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Tue Sep 14 1993 10:52 | 14 |
| The Browns still need OL help. Bernie was hit at least 15-20 times
after throwing the ball.
The MNF dweebs did make a funny, and that was when Kosar "ran" (used
loosely) due to presure, and they started commenting on who he looked
like when he was galloping around, and the last persons name escapes
me right now, but I know it was a womens name. Thought of JaKe,
wondering just what he would say in here about that comment, but JaKe,
I guess you won't get to since you were working;-(
I was rollin' anyway. Got a strange look from the wife...
Tim
|
61.127 | Jackson or Dyson ??? | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 14 1993 10:57 | 7 |
| Ok what's going on here, someone told me Michael Jackson scored a TD
last night, is that true ? and if so I thought he was Michael Dyson
now, did he change his name, change it back, whats the story. Couldnt
they afford to print him a new shirt :-)
Thanks in advance..
MaB
|
61.128 | ???????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | No.3 looms over Fenway..... | Tue Sep 14 1993 11:20 | 8 |
|
Michael Jackson has changed his name back again to Michael Jackson
because of the "overwhelming" amount of mail he has received saying
that the kids really look up to him as MJ.
Chappy
|
61.129 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 14 1993 11:32 | 8 |
| >
> Michael Jackson has changed his name back again to Michael Jackson
> because of the "overwhelming" amount of mail he has received saying
> that the kids really look up to him as MJ.
That's funny. 8^)
|
61.130 | and what position does Michael Jackson play in? | FRETZ::HEISER | notes from the lost civilization | Tue Sep 14 1993 13:20 | 1 |
|
|
61.131 | prone???? Kneeling???? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Tue Sep 14 1993 13:36 | 1 |
|
|
61.132 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 14 1993 13:41 | 10 |
| > -< prone???? Kneeling???? >-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
He plays for the Browns, he doesn't work for DEC, (oh, uh, er, excuse me,
Digital.....)
'Saw
|
61.133 | Thanks in advance | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 14 1993 13:54 | 5 |
| Can someone give me Metcalf's stats from last night, rushing/Receptions
and return Yrds.. Thanks in advance.. (paperless, NO MNF Stats for
metcalf)
MaB
|
61.134 | 12-71;4-23 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:06 | 5 |
| Metcalf had 12 rushes for 71 yards, caught 4 passes for 23 yards. That's
from the USA Today. I can't tell - and didn't watch all - if'n Metcalf
returned any kicks.
TTom
|
61.135 | (8^) | PFSVAX::JACOB | Oh DOUBLE Woe is Me!!! | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:13 | 13 |
|
>>Ok what's going on here, someone told me Michael Jackson scored a TD
>>last night, is that true ? and if so I thought he was Michael Dyson
Ok, Michael Jackson the Brown(spot) scored a TD lasted night, Michael
Jackson the gloved one may have scored a young Moscovite lasted night,
and Mike Tyson is rumored to have scored in prison lasted night with
Bubba.
Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
JaKe
|
61.136 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTY | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:16 | 6 |
| JaKe,
do we get a triple woe next week??
The Crazy Met
|
61.137 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Oh DOUBLE Woe is Me!!! | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:19 | 10 |
| re.136
I sure as hell hope not, but the way the offense is looking, this game
could go 5 qtrs and end up 0-0, given the Bungholes scoring power.
I gots to hope fer the defense to score a few this coming week.
(8^(
JaKe
|
61.138 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Sep 20 1993 08:58 | 50 |
61.139 | Dawgs be barking | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Mon Sep 20 1993 09:39 | 9 |
| Isn't there a leash law around here? ;^)
I hate to admit it, but the Dawgs be fun to watch this year. Touchdown
Tommy Vardells run was a thing of beauty. Plus the winning TD was a real
gut call that was pulled off flawlessly.
I cain't believe I'm saying nice things about Cleveland!
zamboni
|
61.140 | | MSBCS::COULOMBE | | Mon Sep 20 1993 11:24 | 4 |
| That was a great Football game ... With Metcalf coming to life in the
4th qtr. and Vinny Testaverde replacing Kosar, just a great finish.
|
61.141 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Sep 20 1993 12:05 | 6 |
| I watched most of that darned game and didn't know the DAWGS won till
just now...
Boy, am I bummed.
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
61.142 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Mon Sep 20 1993 13:05 | 3 |
|
Hal is out here in San Jose I think, if he calls I will give has access
to the net.
|
61.143 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | MEts in (last in) 94 | Mon Sep 20 1993 13:19 | 2 |
|
Thanks for the favor. 8^(
|
61.144 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Mon Sep 20 1993 13:48 | 4 |
|
No problem just tryin to help.
|
61.145 | (8^) | PFSVAX::JACOB | No, I wanna be Frank this time! | Mon Sep 20 1993 14:58 | 9 |
| Bernice sucked, bernice broke a heel on his new high heels, and went
and left the other pair at the hotel, so they put Vinny Testicleverdy
in, he shows Clevescum what a REAL QB is, not this wuss Kosar, and
leads them to a win.
Sucks, truly sucks,
JaKe
|
61.146 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Mon Sep 20 1993 15:26 | 2 |
|
Sounds like sour grapes to me.
|
61.147 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Sep 20 1993 17:54 | 9 |
61.148 | | SCHELL::francus | po' po' Chappy | Mon Sep 27 1993 10:42 | 3 |
| Gronowski and Hal watch day 1. (Hal might still be in CA)
The Crazy Met
|
61.149 | | 38728::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Sep 27 1993 10:45 | 15 |
|
Had to happen sometime...
After two straight "big games", the Colts take advantage of the
Browns' weak areas (particularly the OL) and walk away with the
win. Kosar again has problems given no time to pass, and
Testaverde's additional mobility isn't enough to pull off the
win.
Hopefully the OL will take advantage of the off week to work out
the kinks.
At least the Oilers and Bengals lost...
Joe
|
61.150 | :-) | 16134::CHAPALONIS_M | The Crazy Met is a WELCHER | Mon Sep 27 1993 11:06 | 12 |
|
Hey
woof!
Chappy (for Hal and Paul)
|
61.151 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Mon Sep 27 1993 13:09 | 5 |
| I told Hal to call me if he wanted access to the net, he hasn't done it
yet. He must be enjoying our fall weather out here, gonna be 90 today.
Ron
|
61.152 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Beavis and 'Dickhead'???????????? | Mon Sep 27 1993 17:29 | 6 |
| Bernice should find a new supplier fer tham high heels, that's two
games in a row wif a broken heel and having to be benched after the
first half because of it.
JaKe
|
61.153 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I don't need no stinking Package! | Mon Sep 27 1993 20:37 | 1 |
| Vinny Greenballs weren't much better
|
61.154 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Sep 28 1993 18:32 | 33 |
61.155 | | SKEWED::MCKAY | | Wed Sep 29 1993 14:00 | 4 |
| Iceman, what's the deal with the form feeds? Enquiring minds and all
that...
Jimbo
|
61.156 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Wed Sep 29 1993 14:13 | 4 |
| Jimbo I'm with ya. I kinda want to read what Hal has to say about the
Browns, but his form feeds are making me hit the next unread button.
John "D cowboys" R.
|
61.157 | Ain't bad....3-1 after 4 | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Mon Oct 04 1993 15:23 | 37 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry there Ron, but, I forgot your phone number. At any rate,
I did make it to San Jose Live for both of the games.
The Raider game was great...the Colt game...well.....
It was kind of funny after the Raiders lost....all us dawg fans
just went crazy...like a bunch of kids...running around barking!
The Browns still kind of scare me though...I'd like to see some
real offense at the beginning of the game.
I really think the Colts were kind of lucky in that game too. The
officiating stank!!! The Browns didn't look up for the game
either. The Colts seem to have the Browns number.
A week off should help the Browns in their upcomming battle with
Miami! I look for the Browns to squeek out a victory next Sunday.
How about the defense beating up on QB's??? What a defense!!!
WOOF!
|
61.158 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Mon Oct 04 1993 17:09 | 3 |
| Thanks for writing a note that we can read.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
61.159 | Quite an image in my mind | MPO::MPO12::MCFALL | I needed 1 more fare to make my night | Tue Oct 05 1993 11:27 | 8 |
| > It was kind of funny after the Raiders lost....all us dawg fans
> just went crazy...like a bunch of kids...running around barking!
Hal, I;ve never seen a bunch of kids running around barking - where
did you grow up - Romulus and Remus territory? :^)
Jim M.
|
61.160 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Let's pretend we're married.. | Mon Oct 11 1993 10:35 | 3 |
| Browns lose...
Time to go back and report more Kimball results...
|
61.161 | OW MY ACHILLES | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Number 3 Looms over Fenway | Mon Oct 11 1993 10:51 | 13 |
|
WOOF!!!!!!!!
15-1
NOT!!!!!!!!
CHAPPY
|
61.162 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Umgwana Cik Buudie | Mon Oct 11 1993 17:58 | 16 |
| HALwatch Day 1!!!!
GROANERwatch day 1!!!
Brown(spot)s(tm) lose, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, now 3-2 and tied fer
the lead in the AFC Central wif the STEELERS. Showdown in 2 weeks.
STEELERS on the way up, 'Spots on the way down.
Lessee, what's the predickshun now fer the Clevescum teem, Groaner,
5-11, 7-9?????
HAHAHAHA
JaKe
|
61.163 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Oct 12 1993 10:39 | 11 |
| The thing I'm finding a little humorous is that the $27 Million Dollar
Man is now on the the bench.
Testaverde (Green Head?) is gonna lead them to the promised land....
Yeah, right....
Be interesting to see what happens....
'Saw
|
61.164 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Tue Oct 12 1993 13:11 | 7 |
| I think that should be green balls, 'saw.
And we should all be thankful that while the Browns went on their minor
win streak, Hal was out of town. We should give them a coulple day
leeway just on that.
brews
|
61.165 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Oct 12 1993 13:21 | 9 |
| >
> I think that should be green balls, 'saw.
>
For some reason I thought testa was Italian for "head", but I'm probably
wrong.....
'Saw
|
61.166 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Oct 12 1993 13:39 | 3 |
| Hal and Groaner watch: Day 2.
The Crazy Met
|
61.167 | Wheres all the wooofing, other than lunch! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Tue Oct 12 1993 18:30 | 10 |
| REplacing Bernie when he went something like 15 for 19 and 3 sacks?
Sacking is his OL and immobility. Tessti didn't do any better.
The head coach is doing the old jints don't know which qb to play
routine....
I love it!
Tim
|
61.168 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't play dat song, dat Achybreaky song | Tue Oct 12 1993 18:38 | 2 |
| He was 15 for 19 but under 100 yards... What's the point if it's around
5 yards per attempt?
|
61.169 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Tue Oct 12 1993 20:56 | 10 |
| re-1
Doesn't that boil down to play calling, no time to throw and bad pass
routes? I'm assuming that Bernnie don't call his own plays. Testie
won't help.
Not that it matters, 'cause I'm no spot fan, but typically you don't
bench a high % passer.
Tim
|
61.170 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | BaldHead=SolarPanel 4 A SexMachine | Tue Oct 12 1993 22:03 | 6 |
| I though I heard somewhere where Bernice was calling his own plays
this year. Oh well, won't be calling anything but fer a pizza on
Sunday, huh??
JaKe
|
61.171 | | CNTROL::HUBER | File and Forget | Wed Oct 13 1993 09:39 | 11 |
|
Word in Cleveland is that Kosar called his own plays weeks 1 & 2, and
then Bellichek insisted upon taking over from week 3-present, with
the possible exception of the first drive vs. Miami.
Whatever hopes the first two weeks provided have been crushed. The
Browns need an offensive coordinator desperately, but Bellichek
doesn't seem willing to admit this. With Vinny at the wheels, I
think we're about to see the Bengals first win of the year... B^P
Joe
|
61.172 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Oct 13 1993 10:32 | 3 |
| Hal and Groaner watch day 3.
The Crazy Met
|
61.173 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Wed Oct 13 1993 12:20 | 4 |
|
Cleveland has all those coaches and no OC? What do them guys do there?
brews
|
61.174 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Wed Oct 13 1993 13:53 | 3 |
| re-1
The same as alot of big company managers, nothing!
|
61.175 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | a 1993=The year of BAD OFFICIATING | Wed Oct 13 1993 17:04 | 31 |
|
>> <<< Note 61.173 by LAGUNA::MAY_BR "Ain't no cure for the overseed blues" >>>
>> Cleveland has all those coaches and no OC? What do them guys do there?
Lessee, they gots some of the following coaches, and these are just a
few:
Head coach--the one with the dirty knees
Line coach--lines all players up after a bad game for their spanking
Back coach--rubs the players backs and spews soothing words after they
lose
Special teams coach--lines up the team to get warm-up games against
special teams like the cleveland home for the Criminally
infirmed, and the Cleveland School for the Brain Dead.
Position Coach--his job is to make sure the players jock straps are in
the proper position, and their cup is installed(Bernice
applied for this position and wanted to be a "player-coach"
but was turned down.
And the list goes on and on.
JaKe
|
61.176 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Oct 14 1993 16:07 | 4 |
| Hal and Groaner watch day 4. And Groaner was in ::baseball at around 22:30
lasted night.
The Crazy Met
|
61.177 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What the hell is a 'hootchie-kootchie' | Sat Oct 16 1993 00:09 | 14 |
| Hal and Groaner watch day 5. Talk about fair weather fans.
Team goes south, GROANER distappears and Hal is not to be found on the
face of the earth, either.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
What hypocrites.
(8^)
JaKe
|
61.178 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sun Oct 17 1993 00:22 | 4 |
| Hal and Groaner watch day 6.
The Crazy Met
|
61.179 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sun Oct 17 1993 14:37 | 4 |
| Hal and Groaner watch, one full WEEK.
The Crazy Met
|
61.180 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | a 1993=The year of BAD OFFICIATING | Mon Oct 18 1993 07:51 | 8 |
| re-.1
Oh, the Mistakes by the Lake won yesterday, so they'll be in here in
full force today, gushing like all hell, and no mention will be made of
their mysterious abscences fer the lasted week.
JaKe
|
61.181 | | CNTROL::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Oct 18 1993 09:30 | 8 |
|
Yuck. All yesterday's win against Cincy did was to show just how bad
a team the Bengals are...
The Browns don't have a chance against Pittsburgh with Vinny at the
helm - which seems inevitable. B^(
Joe
|
61.182 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Oct 18 1993 10:54 | 3 |
| wow JaKe, you were in here almost as early as Karen.
The Crazy Met
|
61.183 | MIA bracelets for the both of Dem | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Number 3 Looms over Fenway | Mon Oct 18 1993 11:06 | 5 |
|
Woof
Where are dem guys???
|
61.184 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 22 1993 11:40 | 21 |
61.185 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 22 1993 11:41 | 8 |
61.186 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Oct 22 1993 12:34 | 5 |
| yeah, but you were in ::baseball that week and always seem
to show up when the Browns win.
The Crazy met
|
61.187 | Watch dem operatives | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Fri Oct 22 1993 13:00 | 5 |
| TCM, he said entered a note. They/him do RON when things go bad.
HtH,
Tim
|
61.188 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Oct 22 1993 13:58 | 6 |
| re: .187
I know exactly what he said.
The Crazy Met
|
61.189 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Touch the beard, I'll break yer arm! | Fri Oct 22 1993 16:45 | 6 |
| re.185
Trying the old reverse KoD trick, eh Groaner??
JaKe
|
61.190 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 22 1993 17:29 | 11 |
61.191 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Oct 22 1993 18:01 | 9 |
|
>> What reverse KoD trick?
You know, where you put your head between your legs and
kiss your a$$ goodbye.
|
61.192 | | CNTROL::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Oct 25 1993 07:57 | 12 |
|
Well, Sunday's game was yet another example of how on any given Sunday
Eric Metcalf can beat any team. If he just did it more than once per
year, he'd really be worth something.
Other than Metcalf, the only good news for the Browns was that
Testaverde had a good day. Even with Metcalf providing his heroics,
a normal performance by Testaverde would have killed the Browns.
A victory is a victory, I guess...
Joe
|
61.193 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 25 1993 09:30 | 5 |
| � Other than Metcalf, the only good news for the Browns was that
� Testaverde had a good day.
I didn't see the game, but heard that Bernie came on in the 4th
quarter. Did Vinny get hurt?
|
61.194 | somethin' about that Pound | CNTROL::CHILDS | thems that die are the lucky ones | Mon Oct 25 1993 09:32 | 7 |
|
easy Mac, he didn't throw any inties. Any game Vinny doesn't throw an
inty is a plus. Just like BBJ.....
not like the Steelers to loose it on Special Teams.....
;^)
|
61.195 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Touch the beard, I'll break yer arm! | Mon Oct 25 1993 09:37 | 5 |
| Mac, TEsticleVerde got sandwiched between Reggie Barnes and Kevin
Greene and got his shoulder hurted.
JaKe
|
61.196 | | CNTROL::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Oct 25 1993 10:21 | 4 |
|
Testaverde's out 2-4 weeks with a seperated shoulder.
Joe
|
61.197 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Mon Oct 25 1993 13:03 | 2 |
|
As a browns fan I think this is good. BRING BACK KOSAR
|
61.198 | | CNTROL::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Oct 25 1993 16:16 | 7 |
|
Word now is that Testaverde is out for the season. You know, if
Bellichek will give Kosar some leeway to call his own plays rather
than this constant "Metcalf up the Middle" junk, the Browns might
actually have a chance of doing something interesting this year.
Joe
|
61.199 | (8^) | PFSVAX::JACOB | All the Babes that'll be there | Mon Oct 25 1993 16:18 | 7 |
| The Testaverde sandwich that Barnes and Greene made was one mean
collision, that's fer sure.
Couldn'ta happened to a pukier team, IMHO.
JaKe
|
61.200 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Mon Oct 25 1993 16:50 | 3 |
|
Well that sandwich may have helped the Browns, I'd much rather have him
at Q.B. Now if we could just get an O-line.
|
61.201 | | USCTR1::KING | Look, I can hear what you are thinking..... | Tue Oct 26 1993 08:17 | 3 |
| Testy is out for the year with a separated shoulder.....
REK
|
61.202 | | QUASER::HUNTER | How Do You Spell Win... G L Y N | Tue Oct 26 1993 15:20 | 8 |
| Ah yes... We'll get to view Bernice in his new dress
for the rest of the season. I'll ventrue to predict that
Bernice only lasts another 2 games at which point the Clowns
will begin their annual trip to the cellar of the AFC Central.
Only to meet the happless Donks at the bottom heep for the season
BG
|
61.203 | Bernie Kosar is our man! | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Fri Oct 29 1993 12:05 | 44 |
|
WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF WOOF
Yes, I'm back!!!
Boy, you guys are bad.......beating me up when I'm not even here!
I've been in CA for the last two weeks which is the reason I
haven't been in this note........do you really think I would miss
beating up on Jake the Fake??? No way!
The Browns are back in 1st and in the drivers seat again! Sure
wish I could have been at that game. They must have gone crazy! The
Squeelers suck worms. HaHaHaHaHa!
Glad to see Vinnie go down. I would much rather have Bernie in
control. Bill B. better get his act together! Doesn't look like he
gets along with many of his players. How much will Art take??? If
the Browns make to the playoffs this year...he take it all. If they
don't......don't be surprised at what might happen. This is Bernie's
team. Bill blew it in the game against Miami......to bitch at Bernie
after the TD pass just because Bernie changed the play. Bill, chill
out! This is the big problem in Cleveland....Bill wants to call the
play and doesn't want Bernie to change it. Let Bernie do his thing.
The Browns aquired Brad Gobal...QB as backup. Browns let David
Brandon go..... another one bites the dust....he didn't along with
Bill either. Don't expect Brandon to be out of work long.
Hey Jake.........better get used to 2nd place...maybe even 3rd.
The Browns are on a roll. Consider yourself lucky that O'Donell got
out of the pound.....alive!
In every game the Browns have played except last weeks....the Dawgs
have torn apart the opposing QB's. Not a nice thing to know before
Cleveland comes to town.
Next up.....DENVER.....may Eitherway's fate be the same as the
others.
GO DAWGS!
WOOF!
|
61.204 | Cleveland almost looks good... (in the standings at lest) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 29 1993 14:30 | 22 |
| The dogs have done ok, but dont count houston out just yet, they should
win there next 2 so come Nov 21 Cleveland and Houston will be playing
for the lead in the division (Im assuming Denver beats cleveland :-) ).
So a houston wins puts Houston and Clevelnad at 6-4 with the Tie Break
going to houston, where will Pittsburg be, theyll be at Denver hoping
to move to 6-4. This is the most wide open division right now, and Id
say Cleve/Hou/Pitt all have a shot, Im going to guess cinncy is out of
the hunt for the aft cent :-). This was definatly a hugh win for
cleveland, a win with 2 Punt returns for TD's is almost no exsistent
in the nfl, but cleveland pulled one off here, and its going to keep
them right in the hunt.
Id say cleveland is more of a threat now that the QB controversy is
over, this will give kosar more time to think about the game and less
time worrying about when he's going to get pulled. If anything Detroit
should have tought the league that you cant swith your qb's around
every week and expect to win.
Funny I was out on vacation one week when the bulls lost a few games
and I was absoulutly chastised and I didnt even have a term available
to me :-)
MaB
|
61.205 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Let mine be a voice for peace | Fri Oct 29 1993 17:36 | 8 |
| Come December, Clevescum will fade off into oblivion, having brought
Brian Sipe out of retirement because their O-line won't protect QB's
anymore.
Hal, see me offline about a p_name wager.
JaKe
|
61.206 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Wed Nov 03 1993 11:15 | 18 |
| Hal, Are you sure its the spots defense that is causing QB's to go
down, or just the painted sand?
Marino went down because 6" of sand gave way when he was trying to
plant his foot to throw the ball.
I think the NFL should fine modell or clevlend until they put in
real grass or the fake crap. At least the injury rate wouldn't be so
high.
Speaking of high, I saw a commercial with Joe Thiesman sitting in
the pound with some that was a lune wif a dog bone in his mouth. Does
this portray Clevland fans in general?
This will be close game with clevland losing. The spots won't have a
good enough running game to keep up.
Tim
|
61.207 | BROWNS 24 - BRONCOS 14 | ESKIMO::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:28 | 29 |
|
Out of all the games this year, O'Donnel was the only QB to come
out with no injury. Marino's injury may have been caused because of
the newly layed grass over the infield. Next year there won't be a
problem with the Indians getting their own stadium. The grass should
take over the summer with no problem. Model plans on bringing in the
stands along the sidelines for next year. I'm sure there will be lots
of improvement over the next few years since the Indians won't be
there.
Now, reguarding the pound: Everyone wishes they could be a *real*
Dawg! USA Today rates the Crush and Rush #3 in the AFC. Surely the
stats will be better after this weeks game. Denver can't run!
This should be a good game Sunday. My only problem will be that I
will be on the plane again durring the game. I stop off in Denver
before getting to San Jose. I'll be wearing my Browns coat when I get
off the plane!
The way I see it ... The Browns will mix it up on offense and break
it open with the pass. 2nd half will be all run for the Browns. The
Broncos will just pass, pass, pass. Hopefully there will be enough
pressure on Eitherway to make him make mistakes.
The Browns will win this one in the end on a Matt Stover field goal
and an Eitherway interception.
The DAWGS will be out in force! The stadium will be sold out!
Over 80,000 fans will go crazy! Look for Leroy Hoard to have a big
game.
WOOF!
|
61.208 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:35 | 7 |
| The Browns will have to pass. Denver has a great rush defense, but
their pass defense sucks. Of course they are going against a mediocre
spot OL, so they may get another few sacks this weekend.
You sure are spending alot of DEC $$$ there Hal (-)
Tim
|
61.209 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | The King returns! | Wed Nov 03 1993 15:55 | 16 |
| They take sewage sludge, pump it into the stadium in Clevescum, paint
the crap green and call it turf.
Then, ya take 80,000 "fans" who bring and eat and throw dog bones, fill
up the stadium with them, and the cumulative IQ of the stadium goes
DOWN by 42 points.
The whole city of Clevescum has been overcome by the noxious fumes of
their industry. The rivers there are nearly flammable, as the Cuyahoga
river was some year back when it caught fire, and anybody who moves
away from there should be first commended for their brains in making
the decision, and then quaranteened fer about 25 years until the
toxicity flushes out of them.
JaKe
|
61.210 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 03 1993 16:02 | 6 |
| JaKe tell us how you REALLY feel.
The Crazy Met
so when do those kiddies start pulling on your beard??
|
61.211 | Bronco's against the Browns OhMy ! | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Sales gets commisions we get "JACK" | Wed Nov 03 1993 18:22 | 15 |
| Since 1971 the bronco's have only lost twice in the city of Cleveland municipal
Stadium. The last loss was in 1989 and we won't talk about the browns officials
changing the directions to hinder a feild goal attempt.
I think the Browns have a strong Defense this year, nothing stronger than the
Raiders, Chargers, Cheifs. The Running attack is much inproved in the last
3 weeks with Rob Bernstine (bear) coming along very well.
Only 1 suggestion to any cleveland fan .....
DON'T LET ELWAY GET THE BALL WITH 2 MINUTES LEFT IN THE GAME WITH A CHANCE TO
WIN.
|
61.212 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Wed Nov 03 1993 19:42 | 7 |
|
Hal
Give me a call while you are out here . I will get you on the net so
you can yank chains after the Browns beat the doinks.
Ron
|
61.213 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Mon Nov 08 1993 10:59 | 7 |
| re: .212
If Hal had any guts - ha! - he would call and note now that the Browns
were massacred by the Broncos.
The Crazy Met
|
61.214 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Mon Nov 08 1993 11:16 | 4 |
|
Well the offer is still open , god that game inhaled. To add to the
insult they pre-empted the game here on the left coast to put on the
patriots......ouch.
|
61.215 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Mon Nov 08 1993 12:43 | 1 |
| Groaner/Hal day watch 1?
|
61.216 | no more skirt chasin | 16421::HEISER | the NBA: it's pretty darn good | Mon Nov 08 1993 14:07 | 1 |
| ESPN is reporting that Kosar has been waived.
|
61.217 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Mon Nov 08 1993 14:08 | 5 |
| Just heard on the RA-dio that Kosar was just cut. Any confirmations?
Tampa, faiders, lams, KC, and cinnci are a few teams needing a QB. I
give the faids the nod, they like has beens (-)
Tim
|
61.218 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Mon Nov 08 1993 14:09 | 2 |
| Notes banging........re-last 2
|
61.219 | Vinnie is out for the year, no? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Mon Nov 08 1993 14:46 | 1 |
| I don't git it. Who's gonna play QB now?
|
61.220 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Nov 08 1993 14:51 | 4 |
| maybe they'll take after boxing and just select some guy from
the stands.
The Crazy Met
|
61.221 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 08 1993 14:53 | 14 |
| This is quite a surprise, especially based on what I saw on HBO's NFL
program on Saturday and all the hype about how they both had contract
extensions. Unless this is a cruel MrT-type hoax...
Much as I like Bill Belichick I'll say this: he's an ASS for doing this.
Belichick ain't no offensive guy and it sounds like his ego got hurt
because Bernie was checking off too much at the line.
As usual, the Browns look like a bunch o' buffoons.....if this is true
and not a MrT-type "innocent collij prank"
'Saw
|
61.222 | it ain't no prank! | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:23 | 23 |
|
>>As usual, the Browns look like a bunch o' buffoons.....if this is true
>>and not a MrT-type "innocent collij prank"
Article 7311 of clari.sports.football:
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Subject: Browns release Kosar
Copyright: 1993 by UPI, R
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 93 13:43:47 EST
Location: ohio
ACategory: sports
Codes: ysfpuxx., &sfpuoh., //ns--s/, tnrb...., ns--s
Note: urgent
Lines: 7
CLEVELAND (UPI) -- Cleveland Browns quarterback Bernie Kosar has been
released by the Browns.
In a terse statement, the Browns announced Monday that Kosar, who
recently signed a multi-million dollar contract, had been released.
Kosar was in his ninth year with the Browns, but differences with
coach Bill Belichick about the offense apparently led to the Browns'
action.
|
61.223 | What about Bernie? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:25 | 4 |
| What will happen with Bernie? Will Marty Schottenheimer try to sign
him as insurance against an ailing Joe Montana?
Jerry
|
61.224 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:38 | 10 |
| >What will happen with Bernie?
I suspect a lot of teams would like to sign him. In fact I wouldn't
even mind it if the Steeler's dumped that stiff, Tomzak and got Bernice
to wear Black n Gold. But he'll probably want way to much money and I think
he's good enough to play first string for a lot of teams.
I predict Bernice will end up in Tampa Bay.
Keith
|
61.225 | | MKFSA::LONG | a foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mind | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:41 | 15 |
|
>> I suspect a lot of teams would like to sign him. In fact I wouldn't
>> even mind it if the Steeler's dumped that stiff, Tomzak and got Bernice
>> to wear Black n Gold. But he'll probably want way to much money and I think
>> he's good enough to play first string for a lot of teams.
Keith, you need your mouth rinsed with a warm Iron City for talk
like that! "Bernice in Black and Gold"...perish the thought.
Next you are going to tell me that Mean Joe Greene is coaching
on a team other than the Steelers.
billl
|
61.226 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:43 | 14 |
| Okay, it ain't a prank.
WOW....
Yeah, he'll probably end up in Tampa Bay.
This move will haunt Cleveland.....
I'll bet WFAN is buzzing over this......
'Saw
|
61.227 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:44 | 13 |
| Bernice is gone from Clevescum?????
Belichick mudta had something put in his coffee!!
Will HAL ever return to this note now that his HERO is gonzo????
The Brown(spot)s(tm) are now going to go into a tailspin towards the
bottom of the AFC Central. An just in time!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
JaKe
|
61.228 | Anybody check the roof over at HLO? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:44 | 6 |
|
What about Hal? I'm genuinely concerned about our friend's mental
state right about now... ;-)
glenn
|
61.229 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Dead Runners Society - Carpe Viam | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:45 | 3 |
| this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.
what a #%$*&@ bummer
dr.a
|
61.230 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:47 | 6 |
| Hal is in California this week. thankfully Northern California or he
might go to Malibu and burn himself and everything thats left :-)
Was Kosar's contract guaranteed? partially guaranteed??
The Crazy Met
|
61.231 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:49 | 5 |
| >this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.
huh??
The Crazy Met
|
61.232 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:53 | 13 |
|
>>this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.
Uh, Art IS alive. Maybe Art was having second thoughts about paying
Bernice all that donero, and Bernice only performing as an average
individual. Maybe he found out Bernice was spending too much of the
money for new "wardrobe" items at Frederick's of Hollywood. Maybe he
didn't like the fack that Bernice's game "heels" were 4" longer than
they should have been thus hampering Bernice's ability to evade
passrushers, and to get a stable stance when setting up to throw.
JaKe
|
61.233 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:55 | 11 |
| >> >this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.
>> huh??
Well, it's true that his heart is still tickin. But a lot of us medical
experts here in SPORTS, think he's brain dead.
Billl, yer right. I'll have to plead temporary insanity. But if'n I get
my mouth washed out with an Iron, could it at least be cold.
Keith
|
61.234 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:55 | 2 |
| Yabut I'm serious. Who IS gonna play QB the rest of the sesaon for da
Browns?
|
61.235 | A new line of Pantsuits is also on the way. | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:56 | 7 |
|
Now Bernie can complete his merchandising of a new Fall/Winter line of
dresses for Wards. His main competition is the Jaclyn Smith collection for
K-Mart. A spokesman for the Smith group was very comcerned over the possibilites
of Bernies new line of "Sack" dresses with matching FauPumps.
Cadzilla2
|
61.236 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Mon Nov 08 1993 15:58 | 12 |
|
>>Yabut I'm serious. Who IS gonna play QB the rest of the sesaon for da
>>Browns?
Are the rumors true that seen at the Mistake by the Lake fer tryouts
were Brian Sipe and Mark Malone????? cliff Stoudt is rumored to have a
plane ticket to clevescum, too!!
(8^)
JaKe
|
61.237 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:01 | 11 |
|
>>this wouldn't have happened if art modell was still alive.
>
> huh??
I took this as a ripoff of Charlie Finley's (or was it Bill Lee's?)
famous line of "this wouldn't have happened if Bowie Kuhn were still
alive..." Get with it, TCM...
glenn
|
61.238 | since when do I pull college pranks! | 16421::HEISER | the NBA: it's pretty darn good | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:28 | 1 |
|
|
61.239 | fwiw | 16421::HEISER | the NBA: it's pretty darn good | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:28 | 1 |
| BTW - the radio reports here say the contract was *NOT* guaranteed.
|
61.240 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:34 | 16 |
|
Re .227 (paraphrased)
> The Browns are now going to go into a tailspin towards the bottom of
> the AFC Central.
Agreed. Why they would release Kosar is beyond me; Bellichek
apparently believes that it's easier to stick a square peg in a
round hole than to find a square hole...
The Browns' QBs are Todd Philcox and Brad Goebel.
Someone's going to get a good QB cheap out of this...
Joe
|
61.241 | ?????????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Number 3 Looms over Fenway | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:37 | 3 |
|
Todd Philcox.....man o the hour
|
61.242 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:37 | 5 |
| re: .240
how do you figure that someone will get a good, chepa QBout of this??
The Crazy Met
|
61.243 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:48 | 12 |
|
Re .240
Kosar is a good QB; not top-drawer, but his strengths make him a good
match for many teams. And he's not going to cost any players or draft
picks, only money; even then, I don't think he'll command so much as
to be problematic for most teams.
BTW, I believe that his _current_ contract is guarenteed, only the
extension he signed earlier this year is not.
Joe
|
61.244 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:49 | 5 |
| so if his current deal is guaranteed then can any team sign him for this
season at the minimum - similar to baseball - and the Browns pick up
the rest? anyone know how this works??
The Crazy Met
|
61.245 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Please walk under my tree stand.... | Mon Nov 08 1993 16:52 | 12 |
|
Bernie "Cement Shoes" Kosar proved this year that he doesn't have
it anymore, not that he had much anyways. Didn't Vinny "Even Tampa doesn't
want me" Testaverde replace Bernice in two games with the Browns behind?
Bringing them back in the 4th quarter to victory. Who was quarterbacking
when Metcalf ran back 2 punts for td's against the Squeelers? I think it
was Vinny. Point I'm trying to make is that the Browns record is overrated.
they are currently 5-3 and could have lost the 3 games I mentioned and be
2-6. The Browns offense is not producing leaving there defence on the field
too much.
Ron
|
61.246 | | DECWET::METZGER | America's most beloved game show host | Mon Nov 08 1993 17:00 | 18 |
|
I don't think football has rules like in baseball TCM because most of the
contracts are NOT guarenteed. My guess is that any team can sigh him for
whatever and he still gets the $$ from Cleveland until his current deal
is through...
I don't think he'll end up in Tampa because Erickson is doing a pretty decent
job at QB this season and they aren't platyoff bound. I'd say he has a better
chance of landing in any of Chicago, Miami, Minny, New Orleans, Philly, or even
Washington. Teams that think they can win it all this year or next.
I'd lay good money on him heading back to Florida or New Orleans...but he'd get
crushed against the turf in NO and be out with a concussion faster than you can
say Wade Wilson....
I'm sure the switchboard is lighting up in the mistake by the lake....
Metz
|
61.247 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Nov 08 1993 17:11 | 5 |
| re: .245
their/there/they're alert
The Crazy Met
|
61.248 | So, the question is still on the table | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 08 1993 17:24 | 4 |
| >>>Yabut I'm serious. Who IS gonna play QB the rest of the sesaon for da
>>>Browns?
Millen, Hobson, Erickson, Flutie?
|
61.249 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 08 1993 18:05 | 3 |
| � BTW - the radio reports here say the contract was *NOT* guaranteed.
NFL contracts rarely are.
|
61.250 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Mon Nov 08 1993 18:18 | 10 |
|
>>� BTW - the radio reports here say the contract was *NOT* guaranteed.
>> NFL contracts rarely are.
But, with the advent of free agency in the NFL, guaranteed contracts
are being given out more and more.
JaKe
|
61.251 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Mon Nov 08 1993 22:49 | 20 |
| Heard Bernice on the radio during MNF tonight. Said he's really
dissappointed that he was released and says Belichick has a lot of
moral problems right now on the 'Spots. He said the "diminished
skills" and "not throwing well anymore" arguments are a crock of dung.
then Greg Gumbel said something about Belichick will be there fer a
while because he just got a contract extension, to which Bernice
replied, "yeah, but so did I."
Bernice went on to say that the thing that makes him feel the worst is
the fack that he
Just got a whole new set of evening gowns in Brown and Orange, with
matching pumps. He said the special orange and brown strapless
designer gown cost him over $2000, and he's pissed and may sit in the
Dawg pound nexted home game and throw the brown and orange high heels
at the 'Spots.
JaKe
|
61.252 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Tue Nov 09 1993 00:12 | 9 |
| > moral problems
JaKe does that mean that his players are sleeping around or somethin'
????
:-)
The Crazy Met
|
61.253 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Tue Nov 09 1993 08:04 | 33 |
|
Re .245
> Bernie "Cement Shoes" Kosar proved this year that he doesn't have
> it anymore, not that he had much anyways.
About the only thing Kosar hasn't done well this year, that he has in
the past, was to hit the long bombs. He seemed a bit off on those, and
that might be a real decline in skill. But he still hit the short-to-
medium range passes, still reads defenses very well, and still avoids
intereceptions.
> Didn't Vinny "Even Tampa doesn't
> want me" Testaverde replace Bernice in two games with the Browns behind?
Yes - in Oakland, where he managed a comeback in spite of a so-so
performance, and in Indianapolis, where he made a winable game
unwinable.
> Point I'm trying to make is that the Browns record is overrated.
> they are currently 5-3 and could have lost the 3 games I mentioned and be
> 2-6. The Browns offense is not producing leaving there defence on the field
> too much.
Absolutely - and it has been since the second week of the season. The
first two weeks, when Kosar was given much more leeway to call his own
plays, the Browns offense was a bit better. Not great, by any stretch -
the OL still isn't good enough to claim that with anyone at QB - but
decent, at least.
I'd guess a 2-6 second half right now... B^(
Joe
|
61.254 | | USCTR1::KING | Look, I can hear what you are thinking..... | Tue Nov 09 1993 08:26 | 3 |
| Hal and Groaner watch... Day 2...
REK
|
61.255 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Nov 09 1993 08:56 | 8 |
| I too agree that with Bernie at the helm, checking off when needed, the
Browns offense was better. Bellichick doesn't know offense. He's a defensive
wizard, but he needs an offensive coordinator.
He made an issue of Bernie checking off, and then released him. Poor move.
'Saw
|
61.256 | I recall Bernie .... | AKOCOA::BREEN | Patriots(too) guilty of malicious wounding | Tue Nov 09 1993 08:58 | 8 |
| I can recall a few years back while traveling thru Ohio on the way to
Michigan (or back) listening to Browns play an important game,
possibly a playoff game(Jets?) and Bernie engineering and last ditch
comeback drive to salvage a win (I won't say of Elwayian proportions).
He certainly showed a lot of guts that day.
But he's no Otto Graham
|
61.257 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Please walk under my tree stand.... | Tue Nov 09 1993 09:43 | 11 |
|
Interesting stat they had lasted night. To sorta backup the
diminishing skills theory. In Bernie's last 16 starts the Browns are 5-11.
One of those wins is when he was replaced by Testaverde. Two more of those
wins were against Cincinati. I would guess that 16 starts brings you back
to the '91 season. Maybe a change will be good for him, I guess quite a few
teams have already contacted his agent. Todd Philcox will be the starting
QB for the Browns. ESPN also reported that the Browns might be signing
Tom Tupa later this week.
Ron
|
61.258 | not too bright | 16421::HEISER | the NBA: it's pretty darn good | Tue Nov 09 1993 11:09 | 6 |
| One of the locals interviewed a guy from WWWE this morning and he said
that Kosar was changing the plays in the huddle during Sunday's loss.
You can get away with audiblizing, but he was outright changing them in
the huddle and they still weren't getting anything done.
Mike
|
61.259 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Tue Nov 09 1993 11:52 | 15 |
|
Re .258
Interesting... the word out of Cleveland is that the final drive was
when Kosar was changing the plays. Supposedly Kosar and Jackson drew
out the play that went for a touchdown in the dirt. Don't know if
there's anything to this or not...
I think it's clear that Kosar's abilities and Bellichek's offensive
ideas don't work together. Seems clear to me that the best solution
would have been to tailor the offensive plan to Kosar's strengths, but
Bellichek doesn't seem willing to do that, which isn't going to win
games. B^(
Joe
|
61.260 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Nov 09 1993 12:03 | 15 |
| > I think it's clear that Kosar's abilities and Bellichek's offensive
> ideas don't work together. Seems clear to me that the best solution
> would have been to tailor the offensive plan to Kosar's strengths, but
> Bellichek doesn't seem willing to do that, which isn't going to win
> games. B^(
Bellichik doesn't know offense. He's great on defense. The Giants
proved that in 1986.
He should have an offensive coordinator there, but for some reason (ego?)
doesn't want one.
'Saw
|
61.261 | Kansas City Kansas City here I come ! | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Sales gets commisions we get "JACK" | Tue Nov 09 1993 13:12 | 3 |
| I thing the no Montana Chiefs will make a offer for a single season for Bernie
to come home under Marty Shotenhiney.
|
61.262 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Tue Nov 09 1993 13:32 | 4 |
| It looks like the Broncos helped this decision!! (-). Bernie can't
beat them.
Tim
|
61.263 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Wed Nov 10 1993 07:57 | 14 |
| The really funny part of this releasing of Bernice thang is who the
'Spots signed yesterday to take Bernice's spot
TOMMY TUPA!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Look out bottm of the AFC Central, the 'Spots are going to be falling
in fast.
JaKe
|
61.264 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Wed Nov 10 1993 08:02 | 4 |
|
Rumor has Kosar going to the Cowboys...
Joe
|
61.265 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Wed Nov 10 1993 08:49 | 5 |
| Rumor confirmed. Dallas has picked up Kosar. I think this is a great
move on JJ's part as Dallas has a tremendous offensive line that will
provide protection to an immobile QB like Kosar.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
61.266 | what me bitter? | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Dead Runners Society - Carpe Viam | Wed Nov 10 1993 09:40 | 8 |
| this life-long browns fan hopes they get thrashed by
the seahawks and everybody else they face (even the steelers, JaKe)
until bellicheck gets fired.
and please don't let bernie land in dallas...cannot root for j.johnson.
lotsa browns paraphrenalia for sale, cheap
dr.a
|
61.267 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Wed Nov 10 1993 10:14 | 15 |
| Here in Pittsburgh, we're only 2-1/2 hours from Clevescum, and when the
wind is right(or should that be "wrong") we can smell it.
One of the people in the office here lives about halfway between here
and the Mistake on the Lake. He was listening to the sports talk shows
the past couple of days and said that the 'Spots fans are bitching
bigtime about Belichick and the Clevescum mgmt. Many have said they
will not go to anymore 'spots games, and are planning on switching
their team allegiance to, get this, the STEELERS.
Glad to see they're finally thinking of following a REAL team.
JaKe
|
61.268 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Nov 10 1993 10:17 | 6 |
|
>> Here in Pittsburgh, we're only 2-1/2 hours from Clevescum
Gee, there's another big selling point for Pittsburgh.
|
61.269 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Dead Runners Society - Carpe Viam | Wed Nov 10 1993 10:19 | 4 |
| detroit would be a better choice to switch allegience to,
but they got the right idea, JaKe.
boycott the bastids 'til modell and bellicheck get gone.
dr.a
|
61.270 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 10 1993 10:48 | 23 |
| The funniest thing to me is the way Pittsburgh and Cleveland folks go
at it about how shitty the other city is.
From what I've seen of both cities, they've come a long way and neither
are as bad as say, Bridgeport CT.
Now, getting back to the Browns fiasco, I think that Bellichick is wrong,
dead wrong, and was reacting more out of some Napoleonic complex "I'm
the coach, I'm the coach", than out of any brainpower.
Anybody knows that you build an offense around your assets, and lets face
it, Kosar was an asset to the Browns. Yeah, he wasn't mobile, and he
threw funny, but he was the least intercepted QB ever.
Bellichick didn't know enough offense to build an offense around anything
and he was too proud to get an offensive coordinator.....
And I used to like him too.... This move was dumb.
'Saw
|
61.271 | too bad Swann is out | 16421::HEISER | the NBA: it's pretty darn good | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:04 | 1 |
| I wonder if he'll start against Phoenix this week since Aikman is hurt.
|
61.272 | | USCTR1::KING | Look, I can hear what you are thinking..... | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:08 | 3 |
| What ever happen to Hugh Millan, the old Pats QB?
REK
|
61.273 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | MAC IS BACK! | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:18 | 6 |
| Hugh Millan was a big dissapointment in training camp this year. He's
listed as 3rd string on the depth chart behind number 2 Jason Garret.
I suspect he will be cut before the weekend.
- Bob Roper
|
61.274 | | SCCAT::SHERRILL | better than a ferret down the pants | Wed Nov 10 1993 12:19 | 4 |
|
A friend of mine is a Steeler fan (still owes me a case of Becks from
the first game)said he would start a rumor that Bubby Brister was
coming to Cleveland.He Was also gonna bring his mum.
|
61.275 | Handley? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Wed Nov 10 1993 12:50 | 13 |
| I'm kind of hesitant to put this in here, but I suppose it could be
true.
In one of the Internet news group, someone is saying that ESPN has
learned that the Browns has signed Ray Handly as assistant head
coach, and that he will provide consultation or something like that
to Belicheck for the offense. There was also something about him
being involved in improving player relations.
Yeah, I know. It sounds like BS, but this is kind of a BSy conference,
so I thought I'd put it in here.
Jerry
|
61.276 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 10 1993 13:54 | 3 |
| Jerry --
Save that one for April.......8^)
|
61.277 | You mean the Playmate? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Wed Nov 10 1993 17:43 | 9 |
| >> <<< Note 61.276 by CAM3::WAY "You can't polish a turd" >>>
>>Save that one for April.......8^)
April? Who's April?
Jerry
P.S. I had a feeling that a Giant's fan might reply to this.;-)
|
61.278 | Hal in Black n Gold ? | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Nov 10 1993 18:02 | 10 |
| > and the Mistake on the Lake. He was listening to the sports talk shows
> the past couple of days and said that the 'Spots fans are bitching
> bigtime about Belichick and the Clevescum mgmt. Many have said they
> will not go to anymore 'spots games, and are planning on switching
> their team allegiance to, get this, the STEELERS.
Where's Hal when you really need him ? I'll be sittin at the edge of my
terminal waitin fer Hal's reply to this gem.
Keith
|
61.279 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Gonna show her my ding-dong | Wed Nov 10 1993 18:44 | 10 |
|
>> Where's Hal when you really need him ? I'll be sittin at the edge of my
>> terminal waitin fer Hal's reply to this gem.
Nah, the HALWatch will reach 300 before he gets in here, or about the
time the 'Spots hire 59 more assistant coaches next summer in
preparation for another "fine" season.
JaKe
|
61.280 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 10 1993 19:13 | 13 |
| The sad part is that inept coaching will cost the browns what
COULD have been a fine season.
This move with Kosar will blow any chance the browns had.....
hahahahaha.......
'Saw
PS April who? Why Miss April of course.......
|
61.281 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 11 1993 09:22 | 2 |
| Boy you guys have short memories. Hal is out on the West Coast and
away from a terminal.
|
61.282 | just pinned my ExcuseOmeter! | 16421::HEISER | the NBA: it's pretty darn good | Thu Nov 11 1993 09:33 | 1 |
|
|
61.283 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Thu Nov 11 1993 10:17 | 5 |
| Ok Hal is covered, but Groaner isn't!
Have the Browns ever beat the Broncos? Tweeking question for Iceman.
Tim
|
61.284 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 15 1993 10:46 | 18 |
| Well, it certainly seems that Bill Belichick blew it bigtime in Brownsland.
I mean, when you lose to the Seahawks, 22-5 something is seriously wrong.
Without a doubt this will rank as one of the all-time stupid decisions
in SPORTS. And the saddest part for Browns fans was that, no matter what,
the Browns were in first place, with a promising future for the rest of
the season. If I were them, I'd be looking to find another team to
root for now....
The funniest part is that Modell backed this thing up. I mean, he
tacetly approved letting Bernie go. That's pretty wild....
Man, I'm glad I'm not a Browns fan......
'Saw
|
61.285 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 15 1993 11:21 | 4 |
| �The funniest part is that Modell backed this thing up. I mean, he
�tacetly approved letting Bernie go.
It sure saved him a bundle of money.
|
61.286 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 15 1993 11:49 | 5 |
| HALwatch day ....
Could someone help me out ? I've forgotten how many days it's been.
Keith
|
61.287 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Ho, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!! | Mon Nov 15 1993 15:47 | 10 |
|
>> HALwatch day ....
>> Could someone help me out ? I've forgotten how many days it's been.
I think it cain almost be "HALWatch Week ?" as opposed to "day".
JaKe
|
61.288 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 15 1993 15:48 | 4 |
| Hal's like on vacation or something out in Northern California....FYI.
'Saw
|
61.289 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Ho, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!! | Mon Nov 15 1993 15:53 | 5 |
| Yeah, but we are now in HALWatch week 3, cause he was lasted in here on
the 3rd of Nov.
JaKe
|
61.290 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 15 1993 15:55 | 7 |
| Yeah, but vacations and stuff don't count, and all that crap happened while
he was on vacation.....
He told us (or someone did) that he was going to be away.....
'saw
|
61.291 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Ho, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!! | Mon Nov 15 1993 16:04 | 4 |
| I thunk it were on business on the left coast.
JaKe
|
61.292 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Nov 15 1993 17:33 | 8 |
| With HAL being a true Sportaholic and Dog Pounder, one would expect him
to call off his vacation n book an emergency flight back to the
Mistake by the Lake. And then get his butt into this notes file where he
belongs. This last week and a half has been an incredible time for
Browns fans, considering the Bernice affair and the fact that some of them
are jumpin ship and startin to wear Black n Gold.
Keith
|
61.293 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Tue Nov 16 1993 01:11 | 10 |
| Hal is in a part of the West Coast where if he were manly
enough to take his lumps he could EASILY get access to the net.
The Crazy Met
ps to Kev: It is not really 1:05AM. Where I am it is 2:05PM. If
you see me noting at 2PM (time stamp that is) then
it means stuff over here ain't goin' well.
|
61.294 | JaKe comes outta the closet | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 16 1993 16:28 | 21 |
| <<< SWECSC::DISK$PELLE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]AMERICAN_FOOTBALL.NOTE;4 >>>
-< American Football all over the world. >-
================================================================================
Note 358.27 Cleveland Browns (1993-1994) 27 of 32
PFSVAX::JACOB "Ho, Ho, Freakin' Ho!!!" 14 lines 16-NOV-1993 00:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>Kosar didn't throw many TDs but doesn't he have a real low int. rate?
>>(it was Modell who canned him,wasn't it?)
One of the lowest INT rates of all time.
Everything I've read was that it was Bellichick that started the ax
swinging, cause he didn't like Kosar's will to check off plays at the
line, which he does frequently, and well, because he reads defenses so
well. Bill B. and he didn't see eye to eye on the matter and Bill B.
initiated the release. Dumb move, if'n ya ask me.
JaKe
|
61.295 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Ho, Ho, Freakin' Ho!! | Tue Nov 16 1993 16:30 | 7 |
| re.294
Now who the hell's been in my account?????
Santa_JaKe
|
61.296 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | MichaelJacksonIsConcealingEvidence | Tue Nov 16 1993 16:44 | 5 |
| My guess is that Bellichick made a deal with Modell that if he
scrapped Bernie he would get the 'Spots in the playoffs. My other guess
is that Bill will be looking for employment at the end of the season.
/Don
|
61.297 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 17 1993 09:10 | 12 |
| Bill B. committed one of the biggest errors in judgement of all time.
Further, he let personal feelings get in the way of putting a winning
football team on the field.
Bottom line, he blew it.....
I guess all that new equipment, and a staff of coaches for coaches can't
make up for one bonehead move by the head man....
'Saw
|
61.298 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Dead Runners Society - Carpe Viam | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:31 | 4 |
| i hope they gave belicheck his well-deserved game ball
sunday in seattle
dr.a
|
61.299 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 17 1993 13:47 | 7 |
| >i hope they gave belicheck his well-deserved game ball
>sunday in seattle
>
>dr.a
yeah....really.....
|
61.300 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Ho, Ho, Freakin' Ho!! | Wed Nov 17 1993 15:42 | 26 |
| Got a phone call today at home from our ol' SPROTSter, --dan'l.
He said "hi" to alla younzes.
He wanted me to pass on a message to Groaner(whose out there, but
ashamed to show his face now that the 'Spots are in a free fall) and
HAL.
From --dan'l:
"ain't it nice to see that the Browns have conceded that the Steelers
are the better team by throwing in the towel at the halfway point of
the season, when the teams were tied at 5-3. Even NPR, the ultra
liberal yuppy station ran a feature saying how bad the Browns have
always been to their players, and what a bonehead move releasing Kosar
was. they also said that it was thru mistreatment that the Browns
'forced' Jim Brown into retirement. Jim Brown was quoted as saying
that he asked the Browns to allow him to report 2 weeks late to summer
training camp so that he could finish a movie he was working on, and
the Browns refused, so Jim retired. Nice to see that the Cleveland
Browns are keeping with tradition and treating the players like sh_t."
Amen
Santa_JaKe
|
61.301 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | John Elway is so YUMMY!!! | Mon Nov 29 1993 18:45 | 4 |
| HALwatch, Month1 , week 4, day 5
JaKe
|
61.302 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Nov 30 1993 08:58 | 9 |
| Boy, could the Browns suck any worse than they do right now?
Does Bellichick feel like the ULTIMATE A**HOLE?
Can the Dog Pound hurl those batteries far enough to hit him at the bench?
The saga continues....
|
61.303 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 09:32 | 7 |
| �Does Bellichick feel like the ULTIMATE A**HOLE?
Didn't Bellichick recently say (after the firing of Bernie and the
Browns losing their next 3 games) that this team is headed in the right
direction?
Maybe these Giants coaches are overrated.
|
61.304 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:12 | 23 |
| |�Does Bellichick feel like the ULTIMATE A**HOLE?
|
| Didn't Bellichick recently say (after the firing of Bernie and the
| Browns losing their next 3 games) that this team is headed in the right
| direction?
Don't think so. I don't know for sure.
| Maybe these Giants coaches are overrated.
Hardly.
If you tried to play wing, would you be successful?
Bellichick should've swallowed his pride, hired an o-coordinator who
knew something about offense, and let the guy handle it. He should not
have let his personal feelings interfere with his coaching.
'Saw
|
61.305 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:20 | 5 |
|
The guys covering the Pats game for NBC quoted Bellichik as saying that
Browns were moving in the right direction. They joked that if they were
coaching they'd prefer to be moving in a winning direction. Marty Schott-
enheimer's gotta be belly laughing every times he reads the sports page.
|
61.306 | "WE ARE HEADING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION" ??? | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:21 | 70 |
|
Hello All........
Well, I guess I should comment on the resent goings on with the
Browns.....
Yes, I'm pissed! I too believe Bill B. made a huge mistake. I
also can't put all the blame on him either. I'd have to say that
Art Model is just as much to blame. I was very surprised by the
release of Bernie. Yes, he was my man! Through thick and thin, I
would support him. In my mind, he was one of the best quarterbacks
the Browns have ever had. At least in my time. He was the only
hope the Browns had of reaching the playoffs this year. Yes, he
couldn't run around the pocket like many other quarterbacks but he
knew where his receivers were and he knew where the defenders were.
So, if he was sacked, there was no one open. At least I wouldn't
go through a game seeing 3 or 4 INT's and saying at the end of the
game...."the quarterback lost the game for us". Now, thats all I
can say. I don't have much faith in Philcox. I don't have much faith
in Testiverdi either. Sure they may have one good game or two, but
for the most part....the games they play in will be poor ones.
My faith in the Browns organization have dwindled much over the
last few weeks and I've been doing alot of looking back. I've looked
back to when Ernest Byner was traded and when Webster Slaughter and
Regie Langhorn were let go or not pursued. Very depressing! A once
great team has been tourn apart. Why? Because Art Model wants to
make Bill B. happy? What about the fans? I'm actually very surprised
that Clay Mathews is still on this team. Also, I'm surprised that
Michael Dean Perry is still on this team. I honestly don't expect them
to be there next year.
Right now I agree with the rest of Cleveland......Bill must go! I
also think that Art must go too. It would be better for the Browns to
have new management, new ownership and new coaching. Instead of
getting better, this team seems to be going in the wrong direction. I
mean, how many years are left in Testaverdi. Not many. Is Pilcox the
next Browns QB of the future? I think not. Where is this team going?
As Jake said........the bottom. And to think that this all started
with the team tied in first place. And to think that one of the
brightest QB's in the league was just released...for nothing...but ego.
I've thrown in the towel for this year. I'll even be surprised if
the Browns win another game this year. The whole team is in dissarray.
Bill has taken a tight team and torn it into shreads. Is there
something going on behind the sciens? Maybe. Does Art want to move
out of Cleveland? Maybe he will try and get a new team to own in the
next expansion. Hopefully he will and with the new team...take the
coach with him. At first I thought Bill would be good for the Browns.
But, the guy don't know how to get along with anyone....he can't get
along with the press and he can't get along with any of the players.
I'm still a Browns fan though and though. I'm not going to throw
out my Cleveland stuff. I support them through the tough times, but
when the tough times are caused by the owner and coach....I have a
tough time. Very depressing indeed. Hopefully the Browns will be able
to bounce back next year....I'm sure it won't happen this year. This
team has gone through too much and won't recover.
BILL MUST GO BILL MUST GO BILL MUST GO BILL MUST GO
I will not however turn into a Dallas fan. However, I will remain
a Bernie Kosar fan. I don't honestly think he will be with Dallas next
year but I hope he gets his superbowl ring this year. It would be only
fitting. It would be more fitting to see Troy go down and see Bernie
lead the Cowboys to the superbowl. IN YOUR FACE BILL!
THE DAWGS HAVE BEEN LET LOOSE.....BUT THEY WILL BE BACK.....
|
61.307 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:49 | 16 |
| Nice note Hal.
After reading your note I know EXACTLY what you feel, because it's what
I felt after the Whalers traded Ronnie Francis to Pittsburgh.
I think it was Terry Bradshaw on the pre-game show last week who showed
a shot of Bellichick and said that perhaps his coaching skills had diminished.
The only thing I can't say is that I hope Bernie gets his ring. As a
Giants fan, I can't say that.....8^)
'Saw
|
61.308 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Tue Nov 30 1993 11:12 | 5 |
| Bernie doesn't deserve a ring, he hasn't ever been to the SB or has
shows that he deserves to go. Riding on the back of the cowpokes he may
get a ring, but not deserved...
Tim
|
61.309 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Tue Nov 30 1993 11:12 | 6 |
| re: .307
sort of like JaKe feels about the Bucs after they let Bonds go?? :-)
The Crazy Met
|
61.310 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 11:28 | 14 |
| �| Didn't Bellichick recently say (after the firing of Bernie and the
�| Browns losing their next 3 games) that this team is headed in the right
�| direction?
�
�
�Don't think so. I don't know for sure.
It was something I heard during one of the football games on Thursday
or Sunday.
�He should not
�have let his personal feelings interfere with his coaching.
Sounds alot like another ex-Giant coach I know.
|
61.311 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | John Elway is so YUMMY!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 12:27 | 22 |
| OK, who got into HAL's account and entered .306???????????
(8^)
>>next Browns QB of the future? I think not. Where is this team going?
>>As Jake said........the bottom. And to think that this all started
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is this scary or what, HAL agreeing with something I said???
(8^)
Actually, although I ragged on him a lot, Bernice was a lot better than
the contingency that rolled thru PGH in the post Bradshaw years, ya
know Cliff Stoudt, Mark Malone, David Woodley, Bubby Brister...probably
better than all them combined
Plus, he wore nicer skirts.
JaKe
|
61.312 | all this kissin up is makin me nauseous | 16421::HEISER | but I *like* it!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 12:43 | 1 |
|
|
61.313 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Nov 30 1993 13:51 | 13 |
| >
> Sounds alot like another ex-Giant coach I know.
>
Okay, so what have any of the Patriot's coaches ever done?
Ray Berry was a great receiver, lousy coach. The last guy was a nice
guy, lousy coach. Rod Rust was in there somewhere too, wasn't he?
Giants fans saw how good he was.....
'Saw
|
61.314 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:15 | 5 |
| The last guy was a great college coach. Mebbe no one coulda been a
good PATRIOTS coach. (Especially spending half the time trying not
to die)
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
61.315 | Dick McPhearson - any pal of the Ninj is OK by me... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:18 | 2 |
| Yabut the problems with the Patriots were not always the coaches. The front
office has generally consisted of people who couldn't put the air in a football.
|
61.316 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:34 | 10 |
| �Ray Berry was a great receiver, lousy coach.
That lousy coach took them to a Super Bowl and a few other playoff
games.
�The last guy was a nice
�guy, lousy coach.
He had a better record than Parcells has now with the Pats, and he did
it without a franchise QB.
|
61.317 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:55 | 14 |
| >
> That lousy coach took them to a Super Bowl and a few other playoff
> games.
Yep, and one of the biggest (if not THE biggest) Super Bowl defeats of
all time.
> He had a better record than Parcells has now with the Pats, and he did
> it without a franchise QB.
Who would you rather have?
|
61.318 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:02 | 14 |
| �Yep, and one of the biggest (if not THE biggest) Super Bowl defeats of
�all time.
Sorry, but the current Giants coach hold the record for the biggest SB
defeat of all time. It wasn't Ray's coaching that got him run out of
town. It was his poor interviews.
�Who would you rather have?
I'm willing to give Parcells a little more time. If MacPherson had the
personnel control Parcells allegedly has I think Mac would have been
just fine. Parcells is going to have to have a good draft and some
good free agent signings to be able overcome the loss of Fryar and the
playing of Secules.
|
61.319 | the original stonehands | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:23 | 4 |
|
overcome the loss of Fryar???? hahahahaaa Stop it Mac you're killing me...
mike
|
61.320 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:25 | 9 |
| Okay Mac, we can handle the Red Sox apologist role, the one liner wet-blanket
role, even the facist moderator role, but being an apologist for the Patriots
is a bit much. Granted the team is now going in the right direction, but their
history is one of miserable falture, largely due to moronic management, foolish
coaching, and terrible evaluation of talent. With a team like this it is
rediculous to defend the past. All you can do is hope that they eliminate the
past faltures and build for the future.
=Bob=
|
61.321 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:29 | 7 |
| No Pats apologist here, =bob=. Just saying that some of the previous
Pats' coaches were scapegoats and that Parcells has made some very
questionable personnel decisions.
I apologize to the Browns fans for the tangent, but I think the
question of whether or not these ex-Giant coaches are all they are
cracked up to be just has to be asked.
|
61.322 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:52 | 18 |
| The only ex-Giant coach (except for Ray The Boob Handley who's fallen off
the face of the Earth) that is screwing anything up is Bill Belichick.
He took a good team, with a winning record, and managed to destroy the
morale, and turn it into a loser.
Parcells is doing okay in New England -- giving that it must be a total
rebuilding year anyway, and not unlike his first year in New York.
Tom What's his name up at BC has had a successful season.
So, for the most part, ex-Giant coaches are doing quite well.
Fryar is old, and is only a role player in Miami - so I agree with Mike
Childs......
'Saw
|
61.323 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 15:55 | 6 |
| �Fryar is old, and is only a role player in Miami - so I agree with Mike
�Childs......
Two Giants fans agreeing about a personnel decision made by Bill
Parcells. The only thing more earthshaking would be Chris Knorr
entering a note praising Dean Smith.
|
61.324 | This is opposed to Red Sox-style "now and never" approach | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:00 | 27 |
|
Even given the low expectations, I'd have to rate Parcells' performance
as average at best this season. But let's not get carried away with
these comparisons with a couple of amateurs like Ray Berry and Dick
MacPherson. Even given the low talent level that he's got to work with
for now and the fact that the critical mistakes have continued during
the learning process, at least there's been some consistency of effort
from week to week under Parcells. You didn't have that with Berry's
detached laissez-faire attitude or MacPherson's rah-rah collegiate
approach, a couple of guys out on the absolute extremes of emotionalism...
Granted, right now these guys are hell to watch and were much more
interesting in some other seasons under these other coaches, and granted
I don't have to sit through the boring games as the more devoted fans do,
but even still, despite what he may being saying now about winning
always being the goal (sure it is-- you always try as hard as you can with
the hand you're building for the future), Parcells was not hired to "make
things interesting" in the short term. So he dumped Irving Fryar for
nothing, who might have made the difference between a 2-14 season and a
4-12 season (and although it shouldn't be the goal, the loss of a premium
draft pick). Big deal; when the Pats start winning in 2-3 years Fryar
will be a distant memory. To tell you the truth, the Pats are blowing
all these games but the output from some of the guys who I thought were
complete stiffs has been surprising. Especially on defense...
glenn
|
61.325 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:19 | 8 |
|
Parcells made a vow that he would not keep anyone who didn't want to
be here. Irving didn't want to be here. So long, Irving. Like Glenn says,
it's a short term loss. And a small one at that. Parcells isn't a complete
moron, he got as much for Fryar as he could. If that wasn't much well,
so be it. Apparently some Pats fans think Fryar was a bigger commodity
than the entire NFL did. By the time this team is really ready to contend
Fryar will be too old to help them anyways.
|
61.326 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:33 | 2 |
| I take it Fryar is up on the wall next to Boggs in the Brydie Hall of
Fame.
|
61.327 | He was droppin back at NU too.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Wed Dec 01 1993 08:19 | 13 |
|
Normally you'd think that Mac, except that I'm not enamoured with Parcells
like Saw is. Saw, still goes goo goo everytime he tells the Parcells/Burt
story....
;^)
I think it just a case here of two guys with 20-20 vision that see Fryar
for what he real is, a waste of skin. When you think of what he has done
with the physical gifts he was blessed with it's a shame. Did he ever hold
on to a game winner in his life during a final drive?
mike
|
61.328 | Bernie Backlash | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Dec 01 1993 08:22 | 19 |
|
Letters from around the US...
Dear BN/I,
Whether you are or are not a Bernie Kosar fan is not important.
What just happened to the team stinks! They have written off any hopes
of the playoffs, let alone the division title. I've been a dedicated
Browns fan for 35 years. I've seen them lose badly and win barely.
This is the final straw - give away your starting quarterback with no
backup in sight!
The problem is (Belichick) knows defense but not offense. Someone
should call Lindy Infante! I don't call going from a 6-10 record to
7-9 a turnaround. Try going 2-14 to Super Bowl champions.
I'm very happy for Bernie. He will finally get a Super Bowl ring.
Now he can come back to Cleveland and show the Browns what the ring
looks like.
Placerville, Calif.
|
61.329 | Bernie Backlash | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Dec 01 1993 08:56 | 26 |
|
Dear BN/I,
I've been a Browns fan since I was seven, almost 31 years. I've
seen good and bad times, but I've never seen anything like the last
bunch of years. The team was one of the best in the league with
offensive coordinator Lindy Infante. Then it started to go bad. Marty
Schottenheimer ruined the team with terrible drafting and the spiteful
trade of Earnest Byner.
Bill Belichick comes in and ruins the receiving corps by losing
Webster Slaughter, Reggie Langhorne and Brian Brennan. Two of them are
stars for other teams. The team is only now bouncing back from that
escapade when all of a sudden Bernie Kosar is released at a time when
the team has no one to replace him.
Is it me or does it seem like the Browns brain trust keeps cutting
off their noses. I suppose next they'll be getting rid of Eric
Metcalf, Mike Johnson and Michael Dean Perry. I can't help but ask,
"What the hell is going on?"
Seekonk, Mass
WOOF!
|
61.330 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 01 1993 09:01 | 16 |
| Thing was, I HATED Parcells when he first came to New York. That first
season we were ready to ship him out the door.
Then he changed my mind.
Fryar was spent. What Parcells got for him shows what the rest of the
league thought of him too.
The Browns are toast this season, and probably next also....
'Saw
PS MikeyC, you gots to admit that Burt story is a GREAT story....
|
61.331 | Bernie Backlash | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Dec 01 1993 09:09 | 12 |
|
Dear BN/I,
I looked up the work "totalitarian" in the dictionary. There I
found a picture of Bill Belichick.
Herndon, Va.
WOOF! WOOF!
|
61.332 | Bernie Backlash | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:22 | 14 |
|
Dear BN/I,
It will be very amusing to see all of Bill Belichick's critics
elbow each other out of the way to get on line to kiss his butt when
the Browns make the playoffs and eventually win the Super Bowl.
When was the last time we were in first place at midseason? What
can you morons possibly be thinking about?
Manchester, N.H.
He said morons...
|
61.333 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:52 | 1 |
| Who is BN/I?
|
61.334 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:54 | 9 |
| �Fryar was spent.
Yeah, he's just taking up bench space in Miami these days, isn't he.
�What Parcells got for him shows what the rest of the
�league thought of him too.
What it shows is that the rest of the league wasn't stupid enough to
give up much for a guy the coach would have probably cut anyway.
|
61.335 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:54 | 8 |
| > Who is BN/I?
My guess is a Browns fan publication, somewhat akin to TGN (The Giants
Newsweekly).
'Saw
|
61.336 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:56 | 27 |
| |�Fryar was spent.
|
| Yeah, he's just taking up bench space in Miami these days, isn't he.
He's not burning up the league if that's what you mean. The games I've
seen Miami play he hasn't caught too many -- just the one big one
against that Pats.
That was probably a sympathy pass....8^)
|�What Parcells got for him shows what the rest of the
|�league thought of him too.
|
| What it shows is that the rest of the league wasn't stupid enough to
| give up much for a guy the coach would have probably cut anyway.
Man, if the Pats had some GOOD players that Parcells got rid of, I could
see wanting to whine about it. Parcells is the best thing that could
have happened to that franchise and all you do is whine about it.
Hey, maybe you can get Ray Berry back. The Giants fans would take
Parcells back in a heartbeat.
'Saw
|
61.337 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:02 | 6 |
|
I've watched a few Miami games and Irving *has* been effective for them.
He's had a few catches like the one against us and seems more sure-handed
down there than he ever did for us. He's Miami's big play guy. Good for
them. It still boils down to the guy wanting out of NE and him being ~30
years old. We got just about all we were going to get for him.
|
61.338 | | MKFSA::LONG | T- 8 days and counting... | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:55 | 6 |
| Yeah he's gotten more sure handed with the 'phins. I wonder if
he's still sure handed with the knifes his wife used to throw at
him.
billl
|
61.339 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:05 | 1 |
| Man you guys have short memories.
|
61.340 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:06 | 9 |
|
I saw Fryar against the JETS, he caught like 7 balls for 113 and TD, I think
but with 5 minutes left in game they were trailing he dropped 2 down and outs
a TD in the endzone that hit him????? you guessed it right in the hands...
he's never ever been or going to be consistent just a flash of brillance
here and there...for all his excess baggage he ain't worth it....
mike
|
61.341 | Bernie Backlash | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:44 | 40 |
|
BN/I is ..... The Browns News/Illustrated
Last but not least...
Dear BN/I,
However pathetic the performance against the Broncos was, the
decision to release Bernie Kosar at this point of the season is hard to
defend as rational. It makes no sense from a football perspective, as
the Browns currently have no other proven quarterback. It makes no
sense from a financial perspective, as the Browns are obligated to pay
Kosar almost $6 million this year whether he plays here or not.
Modell's highest-paid player is now a backup for the Cowboys.
Most importantly, whether or not Bernie could still have
contributed to the team, it makes no sense from an ethical perspective
to unceremoniously dump one of the greatest players ever to grace the
ranks of this franchise. It is especially puzzling when one considers
the respect and courtesies the Browns have extended to other
distinguished veterans, most recently Ozzie Newsome and Kevin Mack.
The immediate effect of this action will be to shatter morale. In the
long run the waiving of Kosar will damage fan support more than any
possible outcome this year, even the loss of every remaining game in
the season.
I have been a Browns fan all my life and have continued to follow
the team closely in the years since I left Cleveland. I could not
imagine a less fitting end to the career of a player who'd exhibited a
team loyalty unmatched in modern sport history. Anyone deserves better
treatment than that. Bernie deserved much better. I'll probably watch
the game next week, but I don't think it will be with the same
involvement. I would wager that a significant number of Browns fan
feel the same way.
St. Louis, Mo.
I did and I did.
Grrrrrrrrr!
|
61.342 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Wed Dec 01 1993 15:47 | 8 |
| Dear BN/I,
I want to personally thank Bellichik for getting rid of that
girly-mon, no-talent of a quarterback Bernie Kosar. With that Albatross
removed I look forward to the Browns making and going deep into the NFL
playoffs. Good job Bill!
Vinnie Testeverde
|
61.343 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | John Elway is so YUMMY! | Wed Dec 01 1993 16:01 | 5 |
| ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooOOOOLWARD Slasher.
JaKe
|
61.344 | finally a win | STRATA::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Mon Dec 06 1993 09:36 | 30 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The defense wins this game with 9 QB sacks. Neither QB for Cleveland
was effective. There was one play that Vinnie called an audiable.
The pass was intercepted. I wonder if he will be released now???
After looking at the standings, Cleveland really doesn't look too
bad. It is still possible for the Browns to win the division.
The Browns are only one game back of Houston if they win next week.
If the Browns win the last game of the season against the Squeelers
and the Squeelers beat the Oilers, it will be a 3 way tie for the
division. Who would win?
Browns 17 Saints 13
WOOF!
|
61.344 | Browns have a pretty good record with Vinny at the helm. | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Mon Dec 06 1993 11:54 | 1 |
61.345 | 'Spots luck one out and HAL returns in full force | PTOVAX::JACOB | It happened again!!!!!! | Mon Dec 06 1993 16:19 | 13 |
|
>>The Browns are only one game back of Houston if they win next week.
^^
>>If the Browns win the last game of the season against the Squeelers
^^
Ya, and IF a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass every time he
jumps.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
61.346 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Poofter's Froth, Wyoming plans ahead | Tue Dec 07 1993 08:54 | 4 |
|
Somebody tell HAL that real Browns fans aren't anymore.
dr.a
|
61.347 | Season over??? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Mon Dec 13 1993 08:25 | 37 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Once again the Browns find a way to lose! Vinny throws an INT
at their own 40 and gives the Oilers a shot at the big winning
field goal. I can't seen how the Browns will make the playoffs
now. It is truely over now. Only bragging rights remain.
Browns still have a chance to win the last three but will a 9-7
record be enough...I doubt it.
Stover misses two field goals in this game....46 and 56.
On a fourth down attemp in Oiler teritory, the Browns go for it.
Vinny tosses the ball back to Hoard...Hoard looks up and sees a
wide open Kitchen....the pass....about 8 yards over his head...a
sure TD....down the tubes.
Kevin Mack is back. Didn't look too bad either! 4 rushes for 17
yards.
Forth down and two with 45 seconds left, the Oilers to punt.....
Mike Johnson gets called for offsides.......game over!
Woof!
|
61.348 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Dec 13 1993 08:41 | 8 |
|
'course, the season really ended when the Browns decided to release
Kosar.
Will 6-10 be enough to get Bellichek fired after a 5-2 start? One
can only hope...
Joe
|
61.349 | 9-7 has an outside shot (But can Clev beat Pitt) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:01 | 17 |
| The Dawgs have 2 gimme games (or should) VS New England and the
Rams so it could come down to the final game VS Pittsburg (and who
would have the better head to head and division record etc). I
have to look at the schedule realiticaly and I dont see the jets
making the playoffs (anymore), they have Dallas, Buffalo and Houston.
So if Miami, Houston and KC win the Division you have Buffalo as a WC
and then 2 of the following (Jets, Den, Rai and Cleve, sd has an out
side shot as well). Rai and Den play in the last week and each could
lose 1 other so 9-7 could make the playoffs (anything less and your
out thats for damn sure). So Tie Breakers could come into play.
The Jets have the worst shot in a tie becuase they lost to Den and
the Rai, but I could get intresting.
(I think 10-5 will take all the WC spots this year, too bad your not
in the mighty NFC).
Mab
|
61.350 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:11 | 12 |
|
>> The Dawgs have 2 gimme games (or should) VS New England and the
New England is a "gimme" game? I'd think that 80% of the teams in the
league would disagree with you and one of those teams is Cleveland.
It's been said ad nauseum but the Pats have played everyone tough
and now with a win finally under their belt they should play with
confidence next week. It would be nice if the offense could gener-
ate more than one touchdown on a *good* day but the defense will
keep them in with anybody - a fact of which we've already seen
ample evidence. Cleveland will have to do alot more than just show
up.
|
61.351 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Number 3 Looms over Fenway | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:18 | 13 |
|
Well the Raiders are at 8-5 they should beat TB. Probably lose at
GB (gonna be cold)!!!. Than the Denver game in LA. That game will
decide if the Raiders go. CLeveland will probably get knocked off by
the Steelers. If Pitt loses tonight they are gonna need alot of help
from other sources.The Jets are done as are the Chargers.
What helps the Raiders is they own tie breakers over Buffalo, NyJets
and Denver. It's gonna be interesting.
Chappy
|
61.352 | No brainer! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:47 | 14 |
|
The Pats have no chance in Cleveland!
Its in the book already!
Really, look back at the games the Browns have lost this
year....even without Bernie, they gave games away. At an
unbelievable rate. Even yesterday.
Look for a blowout in Cleveland. The Crush and Rush will take care
of the Patsies!
WOOF!
|
61.353 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:49 | 7 |
| Sheesh, The 'Spots lose and HAL is in here at 8:25 the nexted morning,
I'm impressed HAL, you finally ready to accept and root for the team a
lot of CLevescumers' are turning to until Belichick goes, namely the
STEELERS????
JaKe
|
61.354 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 13 1993 15:49 | 5 |
| � Really, look back at the games the Browns have lost this
� year....even without Bernie, they gave games away. At an
� unbelievable rate. Even yesterday.
And this makes you confident of a Browns win?
|
61.355 | | DECWET::METZGER | America's most beloved game show host | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:02 | 12 |
|
With the Rams running game they aren't a pushover either. The passing game
sucks but Bettis gained over 200 yards yesterday and ground Chuck is in full
gear...
I'd give Cleveland the edge over NE because the game is in Clevelend. If they
were playing in NE then it would be a pick um...
NE won't be able to score vs. Clevelands defense...throw in some crappy weather
and you've got the amking of a 3-0 game...
Metz
|
61.356 | CSO, US Champs......8^) | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:26 | 15 |
| On the other hand, the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra, long touted as one
of the best, and lately herald the top orchestra in the US, is celebrating
their 75th Anniversary this year.
There was a piece on CBS Sunday Morning about them, and about how times
had changed since the dictatorial George Szell was on the podium.
I've always been willing to pick up anything by the Cleveland Symphony.
They're usually damn good.
So, Hal, take heart. The football team might be stinking up the grounds,
but the CSO is champeenship quality.....
'Saw
|
61.357 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no I'm really very, very shy | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:35 | 3 |
| The CSO renditions of the classics seem a little dry to me.
Isn't this the team that was to go 15-1?
|
61.358 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:37 | 5 |
| >
> The CSO renditions of the classics seem a little dry to me.
>
My first choice has always been Berlin with Von Karajan......
|
61.359 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:38 | 13 |
|
>>Isn't this the team that was to go 15-1?
That was Groaner flapping about that record, and we ALL KNOW that's
he's too scared to show his face in here anymore, what with the 'SPots
going from contenders to pretenders to also rans.
He'll be in here nexted year spouting off until the lose 2 games, then
he'll dissappear faster that a Twinkie in front of William Perry.
JaKe
|
61.360 | led by Sir Charles Mackerras | FRETZ::HEISER | no I'm really very, very shy | Mon Dec 13 1993 16:43 | 4 |
| >My first choice has always been Berlin with Von Karajan......
especially for Beethoven. I prefer the Prague Chamber Orchestra for
Mozart.
|
61.361 | yawn, is it time to go home yet? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Dec 13 1993 20:43 | 4 |
| Classical in the spots file. I'm getting sleepy....Next you will be
talking basball(-)
Tim
|
61.362 | CLEVELAND ROCKS...THE BUZZARD! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Dec 14 1993 07:59 | 11 |
|
As previously mentioned, the DAWG defense is too good for the Pats.
What do you think Bleedso will do when the Crush and Rush are in his
face the whole game? Down baby down! 6 sacks not unlikely. The
Browns defense is there, its the offense that has the problems. And
even though they have problems, they can still score above 10 points
a game. Eric Metcalf will have a carrier day against those patsies.
WOOF!
|
61.363 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Poofter's Froth, Wyoming plans ahead | Tue Dec 14 1993 09:12 | 9 |
| Hal,
Does 'MMS still rule?
Are local folks supporting the Browns anymore?
As a transplanted fan, I hope they go 1-8 under Belicheck and
force Modell to fire him before he sells the team.
Go Patriots!
dr.a
|
61.364 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 14 1993 09:33 | 4 |
| �force Modell to fire him before he sells the team.
Modell has been denying that he has any intention of selling the
Browns.
|
61.365 | Wouldn't mind seeing it happen | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Dec 14 1993 10:54 | 6 |
|
Even if Modell were to sell the team.....at least Cleveland
wouldn't have to worry about the team moving from Ohio! Unlike
what looks to be happening here in N.E..
|
61.366 | Would Joe go? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Dec 14 1993 10:55 | 4 |
|
Oh yea, I heard last night that ole Art may be looking to Joe Gibbs
as the new coach.....
|
61.367 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Poofter's Froth, Wyoming plans ahead | Tue Dec 14 1993 11:07 | 6 |
| Actually, in the broadcast booth (NBC?), Gibbs seems a lot
more personable than he ever did on the Redskins' sideline.
He even smiles and jokes - something I never saw before.
He coaches a boring style of football very successfully, though.
dr.a
|
61.368 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | The Few, The Proud, The 1% | Tue Dec 14 1993 12:08 | 5 |
| I'll take the Pats and 5 for a P-Name bet Hal. Or do you think
this team that will sack Bledsoe 6 times isn't capable of covering a 5
point spread?
/Don
|
61.369 | | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Tue Dec 14 1993 12:55 | 5 |
|
Ha! Lookit Roachy tryin' to get points for a mainly p-name
bet. C'mon Slashah, grow some!
Claybone
|
61.370 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | The Few, The Proud, The 1% | Tue Dec 14 1993 13:12 | 3 |
| Hey Claybone, Las Vegas lives for suckers like you.
/Don
|
61.371 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Oh come Ed Marinaro | Tue Dec 14 1993 13:22 | 11 |
| The Browns just off my memory seem to have played very well against the
Pat's including upset(s) of some of the mid 80s teams. But if this
game is at NE then an even bet should be no problem Don but if at
Cleveland you do need some points, maybe 3.
I always have respected the browns because their fans are so dedicated
and I met one of the linebackers in '68 at Quantico - played '68-77,
someone help me on what his name was - may have been #62
It'll come to me - had a big interception on one of the monday nite
games about 72-73.
|
61.372 | I'll have to check my football cards. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Tue Dec 14 1993 13:29 | 9 |
|
re...breen, must have had the last name Johnson, I bet. Who
knows, wasn't Clay around back then???
re...robichaud, really, do you have to have points? Don't you
think your team will win outright?
WOOF!
|
61.373 | See Lionsmanis | GWEN::ASHE | I ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk... | Tue Dec 14 1993 13:52 | 3 |
| Yeah, he whines and kicks and screams and holds his breath if he
doesn't get points...
|
61.374 | "I want points" = "I play soccer" | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:08 | 5 |
|
Nice try Roachy. P-name bets ain't made in Vegas! Be a
main! We're not talkin' 'bout your grocery money here. :*)
Claybone
|
61.375 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:10 | 4 |
| Points are for people that can sucker someone in because they don't
have the confidence in his own team.
Tim
|
61.376 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:17 | 4 |
|
All you Donks fans are jumping on my main man Slasher for wanting points
because you've found them to be completely useless when making Super Bowl
bets. Hahahaha!
|
61.377 | | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:23 | 9 |
|
What's this? Now Slashah goes runnin' to his big brother
Tommy for some help? :*) Nice slam though.....you know how
it is with the truth.
Doesn't change a thing. /Don has no faith in HIS team and
wants points. Sissy. :*)
Claybone
|
61.378 | | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:29 | 9 |
|
RE: A FEW BACK
At least the Donk fans got to make a few SB bets!!
Cadzilla2
|
61.379 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:42 | 7 |
|
>> At least the Donk fans got to make a few SB bets!!
Let's just hope that the Donks fans in here didn't bet anything
more than coffee money.
|
61.380 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:49 | 8 |
| � Doesn't change a thing. /Don has no faith in HIS team and
� wants points. Sissy. :*)
I think it's Hal that has no faith in his team if he's not willing to
give up the points. Afterall, we know the game is being played in the
Pound, that the Browns have more coaches than the Pats, and the Browns
will sack Bledsoe 6 times (even though the Pats OL has only allowed 22
sacks in 13 games).
|
61.381 | | GWEN::ASHE | I ring my 'lil bell on the sidewalk... | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:49 | 4 |
| Like I said, see Lionsmanis. He won't do it. I buckled under because
although I lost the battle, the Lions won the war and deep down /Don
knows I was right and he was wrong...
|
61.382 | Pats +5 take it or leave it... | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | The Few, The Proud, The 1% | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:53 | 1 |
|
|
61.383 | Hey he didnt set the spread !!! | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:54 | 9 |
| Points are there for a reason, anyone who bets on an underdog without
taking the points is a fool. I love last weeks line, Cinncy +5, NE
score's and you figure no way will there be a tie :-)
Dont bet without the points, he knows what he's doing, I'll take most
favorites in a bet without the points too, boy now thats taken a chance
talk about being a girly mon, give him the pts, be a real man....
mab
|
61.384 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:54 | 4 |
| >> and the Browns will sack Bledsoe 6 times (even though the Pats
>> OL has only allowed 22 sacks in 13 games).
And the Pats haven't allowed any sacks in at least the last two games.
|
61.385 | Well spoken, dude | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 14 1993 15:56 | 2 |
|
Right on, M_Air.
|
61.386 | this ain't Vegas | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Tue Dec 14 1993 16:05 | 7 |
|
All these Patsie fans coming to /Don's defense. Tsk, tsk.
I guess they are all testosterone deficient too....
Be a main Roachy! No points!
Claybone
|
61.387 | How much faith do I have??? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | The more I get...the more I want! | Wed Dec 15 1993 08:02 | 29 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
Pats +5>>>>>>> /
/\^^^^^^ Browns win by 17>>>>>>>>>
\_______________
I'll take that bet!
WOOF!
|
61.388 | Dont be a sucker... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 15 1993 08:39 | 14 |
| 1 real man out of the whole dog pound, congrats !!!!
I guess these are the same folks that would have taken cinncy
straight up VS San Fran :-), I would have taken anyone's action
on that game :-).
The spread is there to make it even, I cant count how many times the
spread turns out in a tie, the people know what there doing, they
win win in a tie. I just dont think being a Sucker has anything to
do with testostarone... Dont get sucker'd into a sucker's bet, take
the pts, if any other Dawgs fan's have any faith they'll give the
pts...
mab
|
61.389 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | The Few, The Proud, The 1% | Thu Dec 16 1993 13:04 | 4 |
| AttaBoy Hal. Glad to see you back your team, unlike others in
here...
/Don
|
61.390 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Dec 16 1993 13:19 | 3 |
|
Hal, you planning to attend tomorrow night at the OPP?
|
61.391 | WOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWOOFWhoopsWHIMPERWHIMPER | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Sun Dec 19 1993 19:58 | 1 |
|
|
61.392 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I'm Santa Claus! | Sun Dec 19 1993 23:43 | 4 |
| Cain't wait to see HAL with the p_name of Slasher's choice.
JaKe
|
61.393 | good thing they got rid of that stiff Kosar... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Mon Dec 20 1993 09:27 | 0 |
61.394 | Here it is Hal... 8^) | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Drew > Vinny > Bernie | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:55 | 1 |
|
|
61.395 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:56 | 3 |
|
This baby was pretty much over last week when M_Air pronounced it
a gimme game for Cleveland. His KOD is even more lethal than mine.
|
61.396 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:56 | 1 |
| TTom, what's the over/under on the HalWatch?
|
61.397 | Browns lose to Pats. AT HOME..TOOO FUNNY!!!!\ | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:58 | 4 |
| He's probably in Californ I A......or so the excuse for not replying
will be..
Tim
|
61.398 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Number 3 Looms over Fenway | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:01 | 8 |
|
Well he was in the FFL conference bragging about his Fantasy team
"The Dawgs" so he hasn't got any excuse.
Chap
|
61.399 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:01 | 11 |
| Did you see the look on Vinny's face when he threw that final interception?
Priceless.....
'Saw
PS Where's all those Pats fans who were complaining about Parcells.
Heck, with a little bit o' luck, he'll do better his first year at
NE than in his first year at NY......
|
61.400 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I survived TSFO, for now anyway! | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:07 | 4 |
| I thought I read in here were the Browns were supposed to go 15 and 1......
Wot happened?
|
61.401 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:15 | 8 |
| >
> Wot happened?
>
I think all that great equipment that they had that would get them 15-1
must've broken or something....
Or maybe they didn't have enough coaches.....
|
61.402 | :*) | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:24 | 5 |
|
Congrats on your unmainly p-name wager win Roachy! Kinda like
whoopin' your po frail ole granny in arm wrasslin!
Claybone
|
61.403 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:25 | 8 |
|
Re .401
> Or maybe they didn't have enough coaches.....
One too many, actually - name of Bellichek...
Joe
|
61.404 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Drew > Vinny > Bernie | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:28 | 4 |
| I'll get you in the playoffs Claybone (if the Donkeys make it) and
I won't be skeert to give points!
/Don
|
61.405 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:37 | 5 |
| Only way the donks won't make the playoffs is if they lose to the
'bucs thised weekend. And if that happens, they don't deserve to go,
even if they beat the faiders the week after.
Tim
|
61.406 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:40 | 5 |
|
Oh? The Patsies are gonna play the Donks in the 'offs?
What year?
Claybone
|
61.407 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:05 | 14 |
|
>> Where's all those Pats fans who were complaining about Parcells.
>> Heck, with a little bit o' luck, he'll do better his first year at
>> NE than in his first year at NY......
"All those Patriot fans"? How many are "All those"? One? Two? Good
game yesterday. Nice to see them make the one or two plays that en-
abled them to win that they haven't been making all season. What I
don't understand is all of the griping about Bellichick. Vinnie looks
like a *HUGE* improvement over Bernie. Better arm, better mobility,
almost as experienced. Bernie had ample opportunity to get that team
to the promised land when he had all of his skills and he couldn't
do it. To think that he could with his skills fading fast is just a
pipe dream.
|
61.408 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:19 | 13 |
| > "All those Patriot fans"? How many are "All those"? One? Two? Good
> game yesterday. Nice to see them make the one or two plays that en-
All those, modified by the words "who were complaining". Even if it
was only one, it could still be an "all those"....
I don't know what I enjoyed more -- seeing New England win, or Cleveland
lose.
But hey, folks, that logo has GOT to go......
|
61.409 | | RICKS::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:29 | 38 |
|
> What I don't understand is all of the griping about Bellichick.
> Vinnie looks like a *HUGE* improvement over Bernie. Better arm,
> better mobility, almost as experienced. Bernie had ample opportunity
> to get that team to the promised land when he had all of his skills
> and he couldn't do it. To think that he could with his skills fading
> fast is just a pipe dream.
The griping about Bellichek centers around the fact that in spite of
having little offensive experience he, in mid season, waived the
Browns best available quarterback (Kosar) because Kosar's skills
didn't fit Bellichek's offense. OK, a lot of it stems from Kosar's
hero status in Cleveland as well, to be honest, but that doesn't
diminish the meaning of the former.
To say that Testaverde is a significantly better quarterback than
Kosar is quite a stretch. Testaverde does have a better arm, and
better mobility, true. "Experience" doesn't score points, so we'll
ignore that. Kosar is more accurate and reads defenses better.
I'd take Kosar, but I could see someone preferring Testaverde.
Be interesting to see the offensive pts/quarter divided between
the two - I suspect they are about even, which would suggest that
Kosar (who makes fewer mistakes) would be the better choice.
All of which suggests, perhaps, benching Kosar to play Testaverde.
This happened, and while benching Kosar didn't make most Browns fans
happy, there were few calls for Bellichek's head on a platter.
When Testaverde went down, and Kosar was released, so that _Todd
Philcox_ could start, that's when the problem started. The team
has since dropped from 5-3 to 6-8. If you're a fan of the team,
who are you going to blame?
And while the Browns never got to the Super Bowl w/ Kosar, it's
hardly his fault. I'm not convinced he could _lead_ the Browns to
the Super Bowl now, but I think he would have been a whole lot more
likely to _guide_ them there than Testaverde.
Joe
|
61.410 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:55 | 6 |
|
It's not Bernie's fault they never went to the Super Bowl.
It's John Elway's and Ernest Byner's! :*) Or was that
Kevin Mack. I fergit.....
Claybone
|
61.411 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:57 | 2 |
| Parcells finally benched his kicker and got a new one. If he had done
that earlier in the season we might have been lookin' at a few more Ws.
|
61.412 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 20 1993 13:59 | 6 |
| >
> Parcells finally benched his kicker and got a new one. If he had done
> that earlier in the season we might have been lookin' at a few more Ws.
>
He had to wait till a good one was available....8^)
|
61.413 | HalWatch is on | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Dec 20 1993 14:52 | 6 |
| Kosar's experience vs Testies? Hasn't Binny been in the NFL for 6-7
years? How much experience does he need? Kosar has only 1-2 years
more than Binny....
Tim
|
61.414 | Bill had to be police excorted from the Stadium | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Drew > Vinny > Bernie | Mon Dec 20 1993 15:53 | 23 |
|
Well guys, I was in here first thing this morning and wrote a
lenthy note only to have it go into the land of nowhere...network path
lost....depressing. However, I'm not going to say a whole lot here.
I think the officiating stank yesterday. Two catches that were
called good but were both out of bounds. Then the fumble in the last
two minutes that wasn't called. Long shot for the Browns but yet a
shot.
Vinny stank! Lose a game because of INT's...didn't I say something
about this before? I can't stand it!
The Browns gave the Pats this game. A fumble at the 10 and an INT
in the endzone. What was Vinny looking at??? Stupid! Yea, Bills
right. NOT!
When will Bill be dumped???
Merry X-mas Pats!
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
|
61.415 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Drew > Vinny > Bernie | Mon Dec 20 1993 17:08 | 5 |
| Tell ya what Hal, it being Christmas and all and you being a main
and all by betting the line and not trying to sandbag me, you can lose
the P-Name after Wednesday.
/Don
|
61.416 | where have all the fans gone? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Drew > Vinny > Bernie | Tue Dec 21 1993 07:50 | 8 |
|
Gee thanks Don.....since I'm not going to be here after today....
that sounds like a good deal. I won't be back till next year.
I wanted to note one other thing about the game Sunday...only 42,000
fans showed up for the game. Does that tell you something?
Woof!
|
61.417 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Tue Dec 21 1993 15:48 | 9 |
|
>>I wanted to note one other thing about the game Sunday...only 42,000
>>fans showed up for the game. Does that tell you something?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That the cumulative IQ of the stadium was only 38 Sunday.
JaKe
|
61.418 | A change for the good!....FINALLY! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:11 | 7 |
|
The Cleveland Browns actually hired an offensive coordinator.
The running back coach has been promoted.
Hmmmm, I wonder why?
WOOF!
|
61.419 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:42 | 1 |
| Bernie to come back? (-)
|
61.420 | tRADE | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Wed Feb 02 1994 12:23 | 7 |
|
Word out of Cleveland is that the Browns are trying to work a deal
that will give them the #1 rated QB in the nation in this years
comming draft. Who will it be?
WOOF!
|
61.421 | did Bernie go back to college? | FRETZ::HEISER | gimme a dollar or gimme 50 cents | Wed Feb 02 1994 12:28 | 1 |
|
|
61.422 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Wed Feb 02 1994 12:45 | 2 |
|
Only if Bill went back to the Giants....
|
61.423 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 13:12 | 3 |
| Belichick in Cleveland, Pardee in Washington, Handley in NY.....
All prime examples of the Peter Principle in action.
|
61.424 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Wed Feb 02 1994 13:31 | 3 |
| Pardee in Washington?? Pettibohn in Washington, Pardee in Houston.
The Crazy Met
|
61.425 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 13:32 | 3 |
| Right.
I get them mixed up all the time....8^)
|
61.426 | Pardee at Washington? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Wed Feb 02 1994 14:00 | 3 |
| I thought that Pardee did coach the Skins at one time.
Jerry
|
61.427 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 14:10 | 14 |
| > -< Pardee at Washington? >-
>
>I thought that Pardee did coach the Skins at one time.
I thought he might have played for them, but now I'm thinking it was
the Rams.
Pettibone played for them (db?) didn't he?
I KNEW I shoulda stayed away from the brown acid.....
'Saw
|
61.428 | Bernie gets a ring... | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Wed Feb 02 1994 14:16 | 1 |
| 'bout the only thing good about sunday's game...
|
61.429 | Coming into LosAngeles, bringin'in a coupla keys | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Feb 02 1994 14:20 | 6 |
| Ah believes Pardee did coach the Skins at one point. He definitely
played for the Rams. And Eliot from Harvard just tol' me that the
brown acid told him that Pettibone played mostly for the Bears, no??
MikeL
|
61.430 | Leave Cleve and get the ring. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Thu Feb 03 1994 07:45 | 15 |
|
I thought it was great that Bernie got to get a snap off in the
game. His name will go down in history.....
RUSHING - KOSAR 1 Attemp for (-1) yard
Someone said he probably got some extra cash for the snap.
I was really surprised that Bernie didn't get a shot at QB in the
second half seeing how bad Troy was. Probably have to thank
Washington for that.
WOOF!
|
61.431 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 03 1994 08:54 | 6 |
| > I was really surprised that Bernie didn't get a shot at QB in the
> second half seeing how bad Troy was. Probably have to thank
> Washington for that.
You truly are joking, right, Hal?
|
61.432 | How's this? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Thu Feb 03 1994 09:32 | 21 |
| >> <<< Note 61.430 by SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR "BILL MUST GO!" >>>
>> -< Leave Cleve and get the ring. >-
>> I was really surprised that Bernie didn't get a shot at QB in the
>> second half seeing how bad Troy was. Probably have to thank
>> Washington for that.
I let the first remark that Hal made about "how bad Aikman looked" go.
But the guy just keeps coming back for more.
So, in Hal's honor, I would like to introduce a new term. I'll TM
it later. From now on, when Hal displays such leaps of illogic as
demonstrated here, I will refer to it as a
Halapropism
Thank you,
Jerry
|
61.433 | Or "halaprop" for short (accepted usage). Rollward! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 03 1994 09:35 | 1 |
|
|
61.434 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Thu Feb 03 1994 09:35 | 1 |
| Rollin' Jerry!
|
61.435 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 03 1994 09:37 | 3 |
| yeah, you've got me rolling.....
TM that baby.....
|
61.436 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Feb 03 1994 09:42 | 16 |
|
Yabbut don't forget,
hth
Hal_tried_Hard
;^)
|
61.437 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Thu Feb 03 1994 11:12 | 3 |
| Ankle-biting Bernie wishes he was half the QB Aikman is.
Hize (not a cowgirl fan)
|
61.438 | Where will he go... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:13 | 24 |
|
You still have to give Bernie some credit though. He did win a
couple of games durring the season for Dallas and also played
a big part in the win against the 49ers.
The big question is where will he go this next year?????
Let me throw a couple of teams up...
Cleveland
Houston
Jets
Miami (If Marino don't come back)
KC (no way with Marty there)
New Orleans
Rams
Bears
are there any others? Maybe we should have a contest.
WOOF!
|
61.439 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:16 | 5 |
|
re: Jets,Oilers - not if he wants to start.
The Crazy Met
|
61.440 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:23 | 6 |
| � You still have to give Bernie some credit though. He did win a
� couple of games durring the season for Dallas and also played
� a big part in the win against the 49ers.
With Emmitt Smith in the backfield, even you would have looked good at
QB, Hal.
|
61.441 | imagine Barry Sanders with a line like that | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:30 | 1 |
| not to mention the 'Boys offensive line.
|
61.442 | Kosar | ROCK::MURPHY | Loosiers | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:34 | 7 |
| Bernie - what I heard was Bears, Chargers, Bucs.
I think Saints should give it a shot. Could be a quality QB away from
trying to go to the SB.
Murph
|
61.443 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Can't Buy Me Love | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:38 | 4 |
| Hal, don't be surprised if Bernie ends up in Washington with Norv
Turner. They apparently have talked about that possibility.
- Rope
|
61.444 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:52 | 8 |
| > I think Saints should give it a shot. Could be a quality QB away from
> trying to go to the SB.
then why would they want Bernie? Here is a guy who always came up short
in a championship game. I mean come on, Elway the chokester was the QB
that beat 'em.
The Crazy Met
|
61.445 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:56 | 13 |
| >> <<< Note 61.444 by METSNY::francus "Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football" >>>
>>then why would they want Bernie? Here is a guy who always came up short
>>in a championship game. I mean come on, Elway the chokester was the QB
>>that beat 'em.
Aren't you being a bit unfair to Bernie on this? As I recall, Denver
won one game with "the drive". If anyone choked, it was the Browns'
defense. The other game was lost on a fumble inside the 5 yard line.
That doesn't sound like a choke job on Bernie's part. He had them
in position to win late in the game.
Jerry
|
61.446 | some people... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Thu Feb 03 1994 13:36 | 5 |
|
Thanks Jerry!
GRRRRRRRRR
|
61.447 | gonna root for the Pats | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Thu Feb 03 1994 14:59 | 7 |
| Hey Hal,
Are the Browns' faithful still hollerin' for Belichek's head
or has the ardour cooled?
Is Modell still committed to that idjit?
And did they really hire an offensive coordinator?
dr.a
|
61.448 | Lack_QB is not the main problem in N'Awlins | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Feb 03 1994 15:28 | 6 |
| Why would Bernie want the 'aints? Hail as long as Mora is there,
this team will continue to underachieve, no matter who the QB
is.
MikeL
|
61.449 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Fri Feb 04 1994 07:39 | 13 |
|
Yes, the Browns promoted the runningbacks coach to that of
offensive coordinator. Ozzie is still the receivers coach and talk is
that Kevin Mack may be hired in the offseason to be the runningback
coach.
Talk in Cleveland has calmed down a little. Bill says the team has
gotten better no mater what happened the last 3/4ths of last season.
Art is committed to Bill all the way. Both say the Browns will make
the playoffs next year.
Browns Newspaper has all the stats with and without Bernie.
WOOF!
|
61.450 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Feb 04 1994 16:01 | 22 |
|
>> Talk in Cleveland has calmed down a little. Bill says the team has
>>gotten better no mater what happened the last 3/4ths of last season.
I cain see if it was only 1/4 of the season that they faltered, but
didn't they go something like 2-8 or 3-7 over the lasted 10 games????
that's bad, in anybody's(except Pats fans) book.
>>Art is committed to Bill all the way. Both say the Browns will make
>>the playoffs next year.
Now there's reason to go bet the mortgage on the 'Spots, eh????
"Specially with Bill and Art's track records so far. What happens
nexted year, is Bill going to cut the whole defensive line if they
don't put out fer a game or three????
BTW, the STEELERS signed some coach from the 'SPots to coach their
defensive line nexted year, any scoop on this guy(cain't even remember
his name.)
JaKe
|
61.451 | tranquil-izer | MSDOA::HYMES | Chief cook and bottle washer | Fri Feb 11 1994 12:27 | 10 |
| Bumped into an old college friend two weeks ago. She is the
daughter of Gary Tranquil - who had been the Browns quarterback
coach.
He just recently quit to take a job at VA Tech. The story
I got was that several coaches were now quietly leaving cuz they
don't exactly get along with Bellicek (sp?).
Just what I heard,
Pat
|
61.452 | Not too many people are able to get along with him | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Wed Feb 16 1994 08:45 | 5 |
| Hmmmmm, I wonder why???
Woof!
|
61.453 | How about this... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Mar 28 1994 08:44 | 9 |
|
Since I did so well on predicting the Basketball winners...
I predict that the CLEVELAND BROWNS will make it to
the playoffs this year.
WOOF!
|
61.454 | new QB in town | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Mar 31 1994 08:33 | 7 |
|
Browns sign Tom Tupa as quarterback. Anyone got any stats on this
guy? Where did he come from?
Woof!
|
61.455 | Buckeyed Pea | GENRAL::WADE | So, what's on your alleged mind? | Thu Mar 31 1994 11:58 | 4 |
|
I'm surprised at you Hal. He's an Ohio State grad...
Claybone
|
61.456 | | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Thu Mar 31 1994 12:21 | 1 |
| He was drafted by the Cardinals and only played here a couple seasons.
|
61.457 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Thu Mar 31 1994 13:42 | 6 |
|
He's a lousy backup, at least he provewd that when Timmmy Rosenbach
went down. Of course, with all the coaches the Browns have, he'll
surely improve.
boC
|
61.458 | | HANNAH::ASHE | like sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his lives | Thu Mar 31 1994 16:54 | 2 |
| He's a QB AND a punter...
|
61.459 | | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:22 | 3 |
| > He's a QB AND a punter...
i.e., Danny White with a lot less talent.
|
61.460 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Thu Mar 31 1994 19:57 | 4 |
|
FWIW, he was signed to be a punter, not a qb (except in emergencies).
Joe
|
61.461 | O-H-I-O | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Apr 01 1994 08:36 | 10 |
|
Interesting...signed to be a punter...??? Looks like they are
trying to keep the Ohio faithfull rooting for the team. Tupa...
Ohio State....Yea, I remember....I think. I seem to remember him
playing in a bowl game.....a bad one. I really don't thimk passing
will be the name of the game in Cleveland this year. I look for the
Browns to run...run...run....and evidently punt.
Grrrrrrrr
|
61.462 | | MKFSA::LONG | That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! | Fri Apr 01 1994 09:41 | 5 |
| Sure he wasn't on the team last year? The paper I read said the
Browns 're-signed' him.
billl
|
61.463 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Mon Apr 04 1994 13:43 | 6 |
|
Re .462
He was the emergency backup QB for the last few games last year.
Joe
|
61.464 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Wed Apr 06 1994 08:12 | 4 |
| Heard he's from a very rich family. They make some sort of food
storage containers. Tupaware, I think it's called.
Lee
|
61.465 | Bernie signs ... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Apr 14 1994 08:31 | 2 |
|
Bernie Kosar is now a Miami backup...
|
61.466 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Don'tDoTheCrimeIfYouCan'tDoTheTime! | Tue Apr 26 1994 12:05 | 2 |
| Yea, he wanna be there when JJ takes over the head coaching job and
Dan retires. :-)
|
61.467 | 30 yrs a browns fan | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 06 1994 11:25 | 2 |
| just read in the paper that Ernest "fumble the ball" Byner has just
signed with my Browns. Why?????!!!!!!
|
61.468 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The Men go Fishing! | Fri May 06 1994 11:34 | 5 |
| Because the Browns don't have a good RB? Maybe he will FUMBLE
against Denver again this year. The dawgs come to pile it hi this
year.
Tim
|
61.469 | BETTER YEAR | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue May 10 1994 12:28 | 10 |
|
Yes, the Browns have signed Byner, they are also looking to sign
the Washington QB as backup. The Browns are expected to make the
playoffs this year with the recent signings. Carl Banks will be a
Brown soon. Mike Johnson has signed with detroit. Pepper Johnson and
Jerry Ball are still unsigned free agents. Langman and Alexander will
surely improve the team this year.
WOOF
|
61.470 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels and Raw Beef | Tue May 10 1994 13:14 | 32 |
| > Yes, the Browns have signed Byner,
A stiff.
>they are also looking to sign the Washington QB as backup.
Another stiff.
>The Browns are expected to make the
> playoffs this year with the recent signings.
Surely you jest.
>Carl Banks will be a Brown soon.
A doubly big stiff. Washed up.
> surely improve the team this year.
Ought to take this one to open mike night.....
'Saw
|
61.471 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Tue May 10 1994 16:39 | 11 |
|
>>The Browns are expected to make the
>> playoffs this year with the recent signings.
And last year, and the year before that, and the year before that, with
all the assistants they had, and....you get the picture.
HAL, talk to us about it in January.
JaKe
|
61.472 | Rypien a Brown | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Tue May 10 1994 16:57 | 7 |
| Just heard: Rypien has signed with the Browns to backup Vinnie. That's
along way from Super Bowl MVP, $3M salary, etc.
Maybe the Browns are planning on Vinnie not getting it done and they
wanted another chance at losing...
TTom
|
61.473 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels and Raw Beef | Tue May 10 1994 17:24 | 9 |
| |Just heard: Rypien has signed with the Browns to backup Vinnie. That's
|along way from Super Bowl MVP, $3M salary, etc.
|
|Maybe the Browns are planning on Vinnie not getting it done and they
|wanted another chance at losing...
If these two guys were testicles, you'd never make a baby with them.....
|
61.474 | DAWG DAY AFTERNOON | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 10 1994 18:44 | 17 |
| Hal:
I'm a lowly "Browns" fan in Bronco land. It has been hard to hold my
head up and chear for them at times. But, I always hang there. I
feel the Browns had a alot of EGO talent, and BB had to act fast to get
rid of his biggest ego; that being Bernie. Bernie was holding the team
down with his constant whining. I can't make a prediction for this
year except that I feel a 9-7 record will win the Central Div.
Hang in there Hal.
Maybe "just" Maybe
We will win a few games and make the playoffs.
I pray that the butheads that note in to knock the Browns "Eat" alot of
crow this year.
DO IT DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
61.475 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The Men go Fishing! | Tue May 10 1994 19:38 | 6 |
| re-1
You and Hal won't get along. You dogged Bernie his hero (-).
Tim
|
61.476 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels and Raw Beef | Wed May 11 1994 09:35 | 8 |
| Ha!
That was a classic.
Yeah, Hal and Bernie are buddies.... (Or was that RCASO and Tony Eason?)
'Saw
|
61.477 | | ROCK::HUBER | Cleveland Crunch - 1994 NPSL Champions | Wed May 11 1994 10:13 | 13 |
|
Re .474
> I feel the Browns had a alot of EGO talent, and BB had to act fast to get
> rid of his biggest ego; that being Bernie. Bernie was holding the team
> down with his constant whining.
Huh? Bernie isn't a great quarterback; at this point in his career
he could probably still start, but will make an excellent backup IMHO.
But Bernie as the biggest ego on the Browns? Certainly not when
compared to Belichek, or Perry, or Ball, or...
Joe
|
61.478 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Wed May 11 1994 11:18 | 7 |
|
Did I hear a report that Mark Rypian signed with the Browns???
JimH
|
61.479 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Wed May 11 1994 12:01 | 4 |
|
What other kind of Browns fan is there other than "lowly"?
Claybone
|
61.480 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels and Raw Beef | Wed May 11 1994 13:45 | 3 |
| > What other kind of Browns fan is there other than "lowly"?
Lead me not into temptation......
|
61.481 | Browns fans are best fans | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed May 11 1994 18:57 | 10 |
| RE: 61.479
Well; I can understand your statement. The Browns have really sucked
recently. But when I say "lowly" it is only implying that the team I
chose to support some 30 years ago cant seem to make it over the hump,
my frustration is apparent. Living in Colorado hasnt made being a
Browns fan any easier for obvious reason ie: F__k the Broncos!!!
All "true" Browns fans have the mindset that if your not a Browns fan
you just dont know football!!
|
61.482 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What partof 'NO' didja misunderstand?? | Wed May 11 1994 19:17 | 9 |
|
>>All "true" Browns fans have the mindset that if your not a Browns fan
>>you just dont know football!!
And all REAL football fans KNOW that if you're a Brown(spot)s(tm) fan,
you just DON'T know football.
JaKe
|
61.483 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Thu May 12 1994 00:28 | 17 |
| >> <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
>> -< SPORTS >-
>>================================================================================
>>Note 61.481 CLEVELAND BROWNS 'DAWGS' 481 of 482
^^^^^^
Hey Hal,
Why don't they change this to something more fitting, like maybe
"Rabid Chihuahuas"...ya know, cause they make a lot of noise, can't
hurt a flea, and piss all over the place when you scare them. yep,
sounds like the Brown(spot)s(tm) and their inhabitants of the pig pound
to me!!!
JaKe
|
61.484 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Thu May 12 1994 11:05 | 7 |
|
re .481.
Hey, I can understand why you feel that way about the Broncos.
And, I love it.
Claybone
|
61.485 | Indians are getting scalped! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 12 1994 12:28 | 4 |
| Would somebody tell me what is wrong with the Indians, thay have lost 9
of 10 and 4 in a row. I would like intelligent responses, not smart
as* ones.
|
61.486 | moderator intervention | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Thu May 12 1994 12:30 | 4 |
| I, for one, find .485 offensive on the grounds that the noter is trying
to stifle a joke.
TTom
|
61.487 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Thu May 12 1994 12:31 | 21 |
| > Would somebody tell me what is wrong with the Indians, thay have lost 9
> of 10 and 4 in a row. I would like intelligent responses, not smart
> as* ones.
In 9 out of 10 games and 4 in a row, they've scored less runs than their
opponents.
Places to check:
a) shitty pitching
b) shitty hitting
c) shitty fielding
Remember to post your findings here for all of our mutual edification....
'Saw
|
61.488 | familiar | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Thu May 12 1994 12:32 | 8 |
| > a) shitty pitching
> b) shitty hitting
> c) shitty fielding
This reminds me of "Good Morning Vietnam" when Robin Williams is doing
the weather and keeps referring to it as "shitty".
TTom
|
61.489 | They've got the guys with the bats; it just hasn't clicked | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu May 12 1994 12:43 | 13 |
|
'Saw's smartass response pretty much nailed it (actually, I don't know
if the defense has been all that bad or not, but it has slipped since
around the time Vizquel got hurt). The Indians' pitching is near the
bottom of the league, which should surprise absolutely no one
(shockingly, that spring training-touted miraculous Jack Morris
comeback proved to be a fraud), but unexpectedly amidst the juiced-ball
theories that have raised everybody's boats, the Indians' offense has
been taking on water so far. I don't expect the mediocre offensive
production to continue, though.
glenn
|
61.490 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Thu May 12 1994 14:13 | 6 |
| > 'Saw's smartass response pretty much nailed it (actually, I don't know
> if the defense has been all that bad or not, but it has slipped since
Was not smartass.....8^)
I just gave a very *succinct* reason why they're doing so shitty....8^)
|
61.491 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu May 12 1994 14:23 | 4 |
| �Remember to post your findings here for all of our mutual edification....
What my esteemed co-moderator actually meant was please post your
findings in the Indians topic. This topic is to discuss the Browns.
|
61.492 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Thu May 12 1994 14:35 | 16 |
| |�Remember to post your findings here for all of our mutual edification....
|
| What my esteemed co-moderator actually meant was please post your
| findings in the Indians topic. This topic is to discuss the Browns.
No, don't tell me what I meant.
Browns, Indians, Crunch (what a lame champeenship 8^)), they're all
the same and interchangable....
Let me give you a hint..... (high Torr values!)
'Saw
|
61.493 | Cleveland is Cleveland | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 12 1994 14:53 | 1 |
| ooops,, I forgot. sorry bout that...
|
61.494 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The Men go Fishing! | Thu May 12 1994 16:18 | 6 |
| Well theres one Clevland fan that admits they were wrong.
The draft has happened and no Hal predictions?
Tim
|
61.495 | Browns network | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 12 1994 16:25 | 6 |
| I was somewhat pleased with the draft. I think the Browns defense will
be strong. The offense will suck once again ie; no running game, no
offensive line. Metcalf will be the only offensive productivity. The
only hope the offense has is to concentrate on the running game, which
would open up the passing game. I forsee a 8-8 season. and a wild card
spot.
|
61.496 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Thu May 12 1994 16:42 | 9 |
|
>>Would somebody tell me what is wrong with the Indians, thay have lost 9
>>of 10 and 4 in a row.
They woke up and fell out of the tree they been living in so far.
JaKe
|
61.497 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | PoliticallyCorrectScrabble | Fri May 13 1994 08:47 | 4 |
| How many assistant coaches do the Indians have? That's the
key to a successful season.
/Don
|
61.498 | Browns rule!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 13 1994 11:10 | 3 |
| Now wait a minute I was reprimanded for noting a Indians topic in the
Browns note file. Where is the moderater on this one?!
But the Indians lost again. Pitching could'nt throw a fit!!!!
|
61.499 | and in the wrong note to boot! | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Fri May 13 1994 11:12 | 6 |
|
Did anybody else find it somewhat amusing that a Browns fan
asked for an intelligent response (like they would understand
it if somebody entered it)? :*)
Claybone
|
61.500 | ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Fri May 13 1994 11:21 | 1 |
|
|
61.501 | Browns rule....! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 13 1994 11:49 | 7 |
| Hey! Claybone"Head":
I requested intelligent responses in hopes the Anti-Browns folks
could excercise there already dead brains, I knew you folks could'nt
reply. You sir only proved my thoery.
Thank you for being stupid!!!!!
|
61.502 | Browns fans eat dogbones (-) | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The Men go Fishing! | Fri May 13 1994 12:49 | 3 |
| Alright!! Spots/Broncos fan rivalry has started, and no Hal!
Tim
|
61.503 | Dawg bones are MMM-MMM Goooood!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 13 1994 14:11 | 6 |
| re: 502
Bronco fans eat horse turds and Elway nuggets!!!
Where is Hal?! I need help here!!!!
|
61.504 | vote of confidence | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Fri May 13 1994 14:12 | 5 |
| > Bronco fans eat horse turds and Elway nuggets!!!
Hey, you're doin fine.
TTom
|
61.505 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Fri May 13 1994 17:09 | 14 |
| > I requested intelligent responses in hopes the Anti-Browns folks
> could excercise there already dead brains, I knew you folks could'nt
> reply. You sir only proved my thoery.
> Thank you for being stupid!!!!!
So, you requested replies from people you knew "could'nt" reply.
Hmmmm....
I guess I must be stupid cuz I can't follow the logic behind
your "thoery".
Claybone
|
61.506 | Browns 3 Denver 1 | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 13 1994 17:51 | 5 |
| So what my right brain is quicker than my left brain, thus the letters
were transposed. My point remains the same. Accidental spelling of
theory is not a topic builder. Your inept ability to use your head for
something other than a paper weight is. It sure is windy in Colorado
Springs today. I think it is because "Denver" SUCKS!!!!!!!
|
61.507 | AFC championship Denver 3 Clev 0! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The Men go Fishing! | Fri May 13 1994 18:43 | 4 |
| If the Broncos suck, then how come they own the Browns? I think the
Browns have beaten the Broncos once in the last 10 tries.
Tim
|
61.508 | HUMBLED | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 13 1994 18:59 | 7 |
| re: 507
2 shay!! The actual number is 2 wins, which admittedly is dismal and
basis for my hatred toward the donkeys. Sometimes it seems
they(brocos) have a lepricon stuck up thier ass. But we know the
Broncos will at least two games against the raiders. We have thier
number. Strange game football! Where is HAL!!!!!!!!!!?????????
|
61.509 | HUMBLED X 2 | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 13 1994 19:03 | 9 |
| RE: 508
CORRECTIONS:
(broncos instead of brocos)
I meant to say lose two games against the Raiders.
thank you
|
61.510 | You made Hal mad degrading Kosar(-) | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The Men go Fishing! | Sat May 14 1994 00:24 | 7 |
| Try 3. The last 3x the Broncos went to the loser bowl, they beat
the Brownies to get there.
And now your a faider fan?
Tim
|
61.511 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Home of the driveby noter... | Mon May 16 1994 10:53 | 2 |
| Not another how many Super Bowl discussion...
|
61.512 | HAL HUNT | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 16 1994 11:56 | 3 |
| Does anyone know where HAL is??? Would like his opinion on this years
draft and free agent signings thus far!!!!!
|
61.513 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Mon May 16 1994 12:28 | 21 |
| >
> Does anyone know where HAL is??? Would like his opinion on this years
> draft and free agent signings thus far!!!!!
>
Let me save you some time.
Dig back through some old notes, and find Hal's opinion on previous
draft and free agent signings. Substitute this years names. Put a current
time-stamp on it. Then you'll have Hal's opinion on this year's draft
and free agent signings.
Follow it up with one of Hal's patented notes that says that the Browns
will go 13-3 or 14-2 and you'll pretty much know everything that Hal
has to say on the subject....
hth,
'Saw
|
61.514 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Mon May 16 1994 14:21 | 5 |
|
Watch out 'Saw. He'll ask for a reply from you (previously
knowing you can't reply) and then call YOU stupid.
Claybone
|
61.515 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Mon May 16 1994 14:41 | 8 |
| >
> Watch out 'Saw. He'll ask for a reply from you (previously
> knowing you can't reply) and then call YOU stupid.
Yabbut Claybone, just the phrase "Browns fan" makes it all so clear....
'Saw
|
61.516 | Boys in a mans world | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 16 1994 15:48 | 4 |
| re:514
Grow up Clay"bonehead"!!!!!
|
61.517 | Maybe we found HAL | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Mon May 16 1994 15:50 | 3 |
| | Grow up Clay"bonehead"!!!!!
Uhh, has anyone seen this guy and HAL in the same place...
|
61.518 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | TCM - World's Greatest Sandbagger | Mon May 16 1994 15:55 | 6 |
|
SPORTS needs more folks like Van Meter. This trend towards
thoughtful discussion, a lack of flame wars and proper spelling
and punctuation would cause several of our long since departed
SPORTSnoters to spin in their electronic graves. I haven't used
my SPORTSnotes decoder ring in over six months.
|
61.519 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Mon May 16 1994 16:17 | 14 |
| > -< Boys in a mans world >-
>
> re:514
>
> Grow up Clay"bonehead"!!!!!
Hey, them's fighting words.
Nobody disses my friend Claybone!
'Saw
|
61.520 | | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Mon May 16 1994 16:18 | 10 |
|
re 517
We were never allowed to go to place like Cleveland. Now I see why!!
Cadzilla2
I did get sent to a GE site there once during days as HDA Man, longest weekend
in recorded history.
|
61.521 | Pissing People off!! I'm good at it. YES!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 16 1994 16:33 | 9 |
| re: 518
Thank you! I'am happy I could entertain you!
Still looking for HAL!!
This is the Browns note file. So, GO DAWGS!!!!
|
61.522 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Mon May 16 1994 16:43 | 7 |
| Any time a Clevescum team goes into a slide, ala the Injuns
performance(or lack thereof lasted week), HAL distappears.
Clevescum SUCKS!!!
JaKe
|
61.523 | the powers of the Universal Decoder Ring | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Mon May 16 1994 16:56 | 1 |
| Tommy, RCASO wasn't a Browns fan was he?
|
61.524 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Mon May 16 1994 17:10 | 4 |
|
I guess he showed me.
Claybone
|
61.525 | Indians on a come back roll!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 16 1994 17:47 | 7 |
| Poor HAL!!!!
Injuns win three in a row and y'all still pick on 'em.
tisk tisk...
|
61.526 | Cleveland is Beautiful!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 16 1994 17:56 | 12 |
| re: 520
One must understand Cleveland in order to have a good time there.
The first rule of thumb is that a NERD could'nt possibly have a good
time in Cleveland. Too blue collar.. If a Nerd such as yourself
visits Cleveland with the attitude that it sucks, then it is no wonder
you could'nt get laid......
Next time you visit beautiful Cleveland try kissing a little as*,
such as mine.......
|
61.527 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Mon May 16 1994 17:57 | 5 |
|
Ha! Jake, I think your "set hidden" record is in serious
trouble.
Claybone
|
61.528 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Mon May 16 1994 18:07 | 14 |
|
>>Next time you visit beautiful Cleveland try kissing a little as*,
>>such as mine.......
That's the problems with you Clevescumites, too many guys wanting to
kiss each others butts!!!!
I spent a week there one night!!!!
Never again!!
JaKe
|
61.529 | Cleveland tourist center!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 16 1994 18:34 | 13 |
| re:528
Golly Jake:
I only meant that when you visit Cleveland again and you ask me nicely
that I would give you a couple of phone numbers to help you have a good
time. Might even arrange going to a Browns or Indians game while your
there. BOY! touchy touchy!
GOSH this is fun!
Where the HELL is HAL!!!
|
61.530 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Mon May 16 1994 18:37 | 7 |
|
>>Where the HELL is HAL!!!
Realigning his satelite dish to see Bernice's every move this year!!!
JaKe
|
61.531 | Bernie reality!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 16 1994 19:04 | 15 |
| I hate to disappoint a fellow Browns fan, but I really feel Bernie was
and is grossly over-rated. First; thinking back to the receivers he
had to throw to, they were great! ie: Slaughter, Langhorne, and
Brennan. All Bernie had to do was to get the ball in the general
direction and these guys would come down with it, that is if it wasnt
knocked down at the line of scrimmage. I'am more upset about the loss of
the receivers than I'am the loss of Bernie. I wish I knew how many
passes Bernie had knocked down at the line of scrimmage, it has to be
a NFL record. A true Browns fan would recognize that Bernie had a
staff that made him look good. I was convinced for awhile. I saw the
light, I feel Bill B. will get the job done. We will be in the
playoffs this year!!
Go DAWGS!!! WOOF!!! WOOF!!!
|
61.532 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Mon May 16 1994 20:05 | 14 |
| re.531
Good QB's and good receivers go hand in hand.
No qb becomes GREAT without better than average receivers, and visa
versa.
Take the STEELERS last year(please)...O'Donnell had a good year, but
would've had a GREAT year had the receivers not been dropping passes at
almost the same rate at which they caught them.
But, I think yer right, BERNICE SUCKS!!!!!
JaKe
|
61.533 | Take it easy...DAWGS *WILL* be in the playoffs! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue May 17 1994 08:40 | 64 |
|
Enough is enough!!!!!
Why blame Bernie for the teams failure the last few years??? There
was obviously many other problems with the team. For one, how can
anyone throw a pass with the defense comming at you like they had
an invitation? For two, as was said earlier, receivers, the only
one the Browns have had is Jackson and he had a problem holding
onto the ball when he first joined the club. Then there was the
running game problem, can't blame the running backs, what happened
to the blocking??? Then last but not least, there was the play
calling. This is the reason Bernie got the boot, he was fed up
with the play calls and deceided to call his own...not at the line,
but in the huddle....Remember???
BB has had his problems but I will have to say he has made some
good draft choices over the years with the exception of Ed King.
Lots better drafter than Marty could have ever thought of being!
This years draft.....I think I already wrote a note on this....
in one word....OUTSTANDING! I think they lucked out with the
cornerback they got and then to get the widereceiver at the end
of the first round.
I read an artical about JJ of Dallas screwing up a trade with Alvin
Harper for the Browns #9 pick. It worked out better for the
Browns!
The Browns also picked up one great guy through free agency this
year....can't remember his name though, it was a tight end...a
blocking tight end! We really needed that!!! Look for a lots
better running game with it in turn opening up the passing game.
The defense will surely be improved but with the loss of Mike
Johnson one can only hope the youngsters on the team can pick up
the slack. From what I see of the Browns defense, the other guys
on the team could surely fill in nicely. The Browns also picked
up two other cornerbacks in free agency. Do you think the Browns
had a problem last year covering receivers??? You bet! Not this
year though. Lets just hope the Browns can sign Jerry Ball, who
really wants to play for the DAWGS. Also lets hope that Pepper
Johnson signs. If the Browns do sign these guys, there will be
no question they will make the playoffs this year.
The Oilers have surely taken a turn for the worse and the Bengles
have gotten better but not good enough to contend. The Squeelers
will be the only problem. I think the Browns have to win the
division to make the playoffs this year. I don't believe they can
get a wild card spot...I would be surprised.
Nice to have another Browns fan in this note. But HEY!!!! DON'T
BLAME BERNIE!!! He sent me another birthday card this year!
I'll have to bring in my latest BNI and tell you whats being said
in the Rock n Roll capital of the world.
LIVE BABY LIVE
Go DAWGS!!!
WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!
|
61.534 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Brillant, Charming and Nasty | Tue May 17 1994 09:21 | 5 |
|
that couldn't have been Hal, he actually said something nice about the
Steelers........
;^)
|
61.535 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue May 17 1994 09:59 | 1 |
| Oh, thank God HAL's back...
|
61.536 | | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Tue May 17 1994 11:45 | 12 |
|
re 526:
Well I've been called a lot of things but never a NERD!!. Anytime I spend two
night looking for action and the hotel has the only place around, I consider the
place to be a dump. I came from Ford in Detroit before going to GE in Cleveland
and had a better time. The funniest thing about it, was their claim as the Rock
n Roll capitol of the world. What a joke!!! If you and Hal are representative
of the Cleveland culture, I see were it gets it;s fame.
Cadzilla2
|
61.537 | Cleveland is a Dump?! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 17 1994 12:32 | 17 |
| re:536
Thank You!!!
Yes!! Cleveland is the Rock -n- Roll capital of the World! Has been
for a while now. Declared, voted on and a Hall of fame built there.
I don't see the humor in this "fact". I tell you what is funny, is the
fact you came from Detroit and thought Cleveland was a dump. If GOD
was going to give the world and enema, Detroit is where HE would stick
the hose.
The Browns "are" number #1
Indians and Reds in World Series
Cavs back Alive in 95....
Thank you for your Support!!!!
|
61.538 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Tue May 17 1994 12:44 | 1 |
| You guys ought to clean up the imagery just a little bit....
|
61.539 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue May 17 1994 12:49 | 4 |
| � Yes!! Cleveland is the Rock -n- Roll capital of the World! Has been
� for a while now. Declared, voted on and a Hall of fame built there.
Built there? They haven't even broken ground on it yet.
|
61.540 | | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Tue May 17 1994 12:59 | 8 |
|
Well I must still say the week I spent in Detroit/Deerfield Village MI.
was better then the weekend I was stuck in Cleveland. I would not consider
either my favorite or the worst spots that DEC has seen fit to send me to in
support of our products in my 20+ years of Field work.
Cadzilla2
|
61.541 | WELCOME BACK HAL!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 17 1994 14:03 | 15 |
| HAL:
It is sure a relief to findly here from you. I have been pretty beat
up by the non-Browns noters out there. They are either knocking the
Browns or correcting my spelling. I have a picture in my mind on what
these gentlemen look like and it is not pretty. I dont know how you
have endured their abuse over the years. But, I guess when someone is
right as we are in our opinion and choice of sports teams make it a
little more bearable. I think you'll be happy to pass out the dishes
of crow for these buttheads to eat. I will supply the crying towels.
Browns knock at Super Bowl Door in 94!
GO DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!
|
61.542 | similar styles | CTHQ::LEARY | It'sBeenALongTimeComing... | Tue May 17 1994 14:05 | 11 |
|
All we need is fer BigGame to re-appear in the Donks file and we'd
have two peas in a pod.
Guns a blazin'
MikeL
|
61.543 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Brillant, Charming and Nasty | Tue May 17 1994 14:10 | 6 |
|
speakin' of Gamey, did anyone catch the commerical of Elway flingin' that
football with the tail on it? Straightest passes he's ever thrown. I'll
bet he's petitionin' the league right now to switch to it.....
mike
|
61.544 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Tue May 17 1994 14:12 | 14 |
| re .541:
I never thought I'd see the day, but it's back and alive:
RCASO II
arghhhh........
'Saw
PS Cleveland might make it as far as the Welcome Mat of the Super Bowl
|
61.545 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Tue May 17 1994 14:48 | 12 |
| > Browns or correcting my spelling. I have a picture in my mind on what
> these gentlemen look like and it is not pretty. I dont know how you
Pretty small picture eh?
Now, you're the guy who said his right brain was faster than
his left brain, right? So, you have two. I vote that you
give one of yours to Hal so that you'll both have 1 whole
brain. It would be very magnanimous on your part and all
of ::sports would appreciate it.
Claybone
|
61.546 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue May 17 1994 15:01 | 4 |
| There really are literate, intelligent Browns fans in the world. I think I've
met all three of them.
=Bob=
|
61.547 | Browns in SB? Add some of that to my coffee | QUASER::JACKSONTA | The Men go Fishing! | Tue May 17 1994 15:15 | 13 |
| re-vanmeter
1) Just because the R&R Hall of Fame may be built there doesn't make
it the R&R capital. We have the Rodeo Hall Of Fame here in Colorado
Spring, but we certainly don't consider Colorado Springs the Rodeo
Capital.
2) I hope I'm not pretty to you!!
3) Don't you have a name?
Tim
|
61.548 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Tue May 17 1994 15:25 | 10 |
| > Now, you're the guy who said his right brain was faster than
> his left brain, right? So, you have two. I vote that you
> give one of yours to Hal so that you'll both have 1 whole
> brain. It would be very magnanimous on your part and all
> of ::sports would appreciate it.
Claybone, that's CLASSIC......
'Saw
|
61.549 | Cleveland is R&R Capital! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 17 1994 16:16 | 11 |
| re:547
OK! For the sake of argument. You tell me then, where! is the R&R
capital. You are arguing that it is not Cleveland. Prove me wrong! or
shut up!!!!!
Thank you for your support!!!!!!
Jeff
|
61.550 | Elway has big lips! He didnt in High School!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 17 1994 16:20 | 8 |
| I appreciate the slap at Elway! The Browns will send him straight to
hell this year......!
GO DAWGS!!!!! WOOF!!!! WOOF!!!!
Jeff
|
61.551 | 'Nuf said | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Tue May 17 1994 16:23 | 45 |
| WHAT IS A BROWN?????????
A BENGAL is a Tiger
And a fast plane is a JET
A COWBOY comes from Texas
And a RAIDER is tough, I bet,
A VIKING is from the frigid north
SEAHAWKS live by the sea
All are names of football teams
Just like they ought to be,
I don't know if it's true
But I think I've heard a theory
That Cleveland named it's football team
After the color of Lake Erie,
BROWN does not describe
A big, strong athletic man
It's what's inside the diaper
of a baby STEELER fan,
The guy who named this football team
Must be a Cleveland Clown
Who else would think to call
A football warrior a BROWN
If I'd been born in Cleveland
And there my life was spent
I'd find another team to cheer
From pure embarassment,
I, myself, have always loved
The STEELERS "Black and Gold"
i did when I was very young
And will when I am old,
Does the BROWN name come from BROWNIES
The girl scouts we know of sorts
Or is the name derived
From the skidmarks in their shorts???
Can anybody tell me
WHAT THE HELL IS A BROWN???????????????/
|
61.552 | What Rock legends came from Clevescum? | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Tue May 17 1994 16:39 | 6 |
|
Well since the roots of Rock started in the south, I can't see how Cleveland
can be the capitol. Memphis comes much closer, with Elvis, Jerry Lee and Chuck
Berry among others coming from that general area.
Cadzilla2
|
61.553 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Tue May 17 1994 16:41 | 6 |
| They're trying to find some non-toxic land up there to build it on.
But in no way is Clevescum the TRUE CAPITAL, hail, they just offered
more donero to the developers of the R&R HoF.
JaKe
|
61.554 | OH YEAH!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 17 1994 16:44 | 13 |
| re: 548
Hey! Pretty good! Clay"bonehead" youre improving. Your folks would be
proud. With a little practice you may someday advance out of idiot
status. The first step of course would be to repent of your sins and
become a BROWNS fan!. You would then see the World in a better light
and you would learn three(3) valuble life lessons; Patience, Humility
and the ability too crap from empty headed idiots with out blinking
an eye.......
jeff
|
61.555 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Tue May 17 1994 16:46 | 4 |
| Oh, cripes sakes, 2 HAL's, our worst nightmare!!!!!!!!!!
JaKe
|
61.556 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Tue May 17 1994 16:48 | 15 |
|
>>status. The first step of course would be to repent of your sins and
>>become a BROWNS fan!. You would then see the World in a better light
>>and you would learn three(3) valuble life lessons; Patience, Humility
>>and the ability too crap from empty headed idiots with out blinking
>>an eye.......
You forgot one valuable lesson you have to learn in Clevescum, dealing
with toxic waste as an everyday occurence, seeing as Clevescum is the
world's only inhabitated toxic waste/raw sewage dump.
Go back in yer hole, sewer rat!!!
JaKe
|
61.557 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Tue May 17 1994 17:01 | 5 |
| >Well since the roots of Rock started in the south, I can't see how Cleveland
>can be the capitol. Memphis comes much closer, with Elvis, Jerry Lee and Chuck
>Berry among others coming from that general area.
Can't forget the likes of Carl Perkins either.....
|
61.558 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Tue May 17 1994 17:09 | 6 |
|
OK. <Shazam!> I'm a Browns fan. Now I'm at idiot status!
Please give me mega doses of humility. I need it because
we've been humiliated so badly by the Broncos.
Stupid
|
61.559 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Tue May 17 1994 17:13 | 15 |
| >
> OK. <Shazam!> I'm a Browns fan. Now I'm at idiot status!
> Please give me mega doses of humility. I need it because
> we've been humiliated so badly by the Broncos.
>
> Stupid
Snap out of it Claybone!
Man, idiocy is catching.... I mean, I hate the Broncos, but the Browns,
man, the Browns... whoa... how low can you go.....
'Saw
|
61.560 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Home of the driveby noter... | Tue May 17 1994 17:30 | 5 |
| Detriot (tm) >> Cleveland:
Detriot: No place for wimps
Cleveland: No place for humans...
|
61.561 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Tue May 17 1994 17:32 | 9 |
| > Cleveland: No place for humans...
The Land of Cleves. If it was the Land of Cleavage, I could get into
that. Unfortunately no one around here ever heard of a cleve....
'Saw
|
61.562 | | ROCK::HUBER | Cleveland Crunch - 1994 NPSL Champions | Tue May 17 1994 17:35 | 27 |
|
Re: Browns
FWIW, I think they had a decent draft. However, Vinnie & Rypien aren't
going to lead a team anywhere. Best case, the defense (particularly
the secondary) gels, and the Browns make the playoffs. I still
want to see Belichek fired, even if that happens.
Re: R&R Hall of Fame
The key claim for Cleveland, at least that I'm aware of, is that
a DJ (Bill F-something), working in Cleveland at the time, coined
the phrase Rock and Roll. There have been some groups to come
out of Cleveland, but not many of any note (Raspberries come to
mind).
BTW, I believe they have broken ground.
Re: Cleveland Jokes
Watching a bit of Mr. Baseball last night, I had the chance to see
yet another derogatory reference to Cleveland. Has a negative
impression of the city become so ingrained into American culture
that no amount of change (and IMHO it's clear that the city has
improved in recent years) will change public opinion?
Joe (probably about to regret opening his mouth during this string...)
|
61.563 | JAKE'A DAWG! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 17 1994 18:12 | 10 |
| RE: 551
Wow! Jake, I am speechless, I dont know what to say. Your poem was
heart felt. It is a work of art. I am honored to have been able to
read it. Tell me! You are really a BROWNS fan arent ya! I mean after
all you are named after a DAWG!. I even heard a song about ya! FEED
JAKE! Good tune. But all kidding aside, Great! poem.
jeff
|
61.564 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue May 17 1994 18:15 | 3 |
| re: .562
You see - a literate Browns fan. In ::SPROTS no less.
|
61.565 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Tue May 17 1994 18:29 | 31 |
|
>>Re: Browns
>>FWIW, I think they had a decent draft.
Now if yer talking Newcastle Brown (Ale), that's a good draft. I'd be
suspicious of any brew coming from Clevescum as it'd probably be
Cuyahoga River water, and that stuff is flammable.
>>The key claim for Cleveland, at least that I'm aware of, is that
>>a DJ (Bill F-something), working in Cleveland at the time, coined
>>the phrase Rock and Roll. There have been some groups to come
>>out of Cleveland, but not many of any note (Raspberries come to
>>mind).
The Michael Stanley Band was another short lived not too great band
from Clevescum.
>>BTW, I believe they have broken ground.
More accurately, "broken sludge" fer Clevescum...and the wimmens(term
used loosely) are continuing to break wind.
>>Re: Cleveland Jokes
Clevescum IS a joke.
JaKe
|
61.566 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Tue May 17 1994 18:32 | 14 |
|
>>read it. Tell me! You are really a BROWNS fan arent ya! I mean after
>>all you are named after a DAWG!. I even heard a song about ya! FEED
>>JAKE! Good tune. But all kidding aside, Great! poem.
Nope not a Brown(spot)s(tm) fan at all, and the name similarity with
the song is just a co-ink-eee-dink.
Although, when I see a map of OHIO, I do squat and crap on Clevescum.
Re the poem, unfortunately, I din't compose it, just passed it on.
JaKe
|
61.567 | Broon Cack. | PAKORA::DWALLACE | Nymphing maniac | Wed May 18 1994 07:07 | 8 |
| I'll interperate an old Cleveland word into the Scots mother tongue:
Browns = Sad act
What more can I say except have a little sympathy for us Miami fans
having the highest paid failure QB as a back-up this season.
Davie.
|
61.568 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 18 1994 10:22 | 5 |
| � Now if yer talking Newcastle Brown (Ale), that's a good draft. I'd be
� suspicious of any brew coming from Clevescum as it'd probably be
� Cuyahoga River water, and that stuff is flammable.
That's pretty funny coming from an Iron City man.
|
61.569 | Cuss'nt stay silent anemore | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Wed May 18 1994 10:34 | 16 |
| Weel, Iv'e been paitiently waiting backin the backgrround here for
sumone to say sumthing that sumone cain underdaind that makes sume
sense about the CLEVLEAND BROWNS, but so far so one has said sumthing
so I geuss I will.
Bilichik has asseemlbed a team that nexted year can easily content for
the AFC titel. Belechik may not have a greet personality, but he
cain't be expected to deal wif the press aprioctially and remain treu
to his players. Bilechek knows one is greeater than the other. For
Beleichik to cowtow to the press would be worng and Bellichek nows
right frum worng.
Brigning in Tistenventre to run the offense WEORKED!!! It will
agian!!!! Browns defense is worked, too!!! Offsne plus
defnse==CHAPIONSHIONPS!!!! SO AFC ISS OURS NEXTRED SEEASON!!!!
YOU NOW WOH I AM
|
61.570 | | ROCK::HUBER | Cleveland Crunch - 1994 NPSL Champions | Wed May 18 1994 10:44 | 10 |
|
Re .565
> The Michael Stanley Band was another short lived not too great band
> from Clevescum.
Didn't think they had enough national noteriety to name, or I would
have.
Joe
|
61.571 | BROWNS to take it all!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed May 18 1994 11:44 | 15 |
| You heard it here first. hearyee! hearyee! hearyee!
BROWNS -N- GIANTS in Super Bowl!!!
BROWNS win it all in a blow out!!!
Boys its a given bet the ranch!!!!
No sense playing the season, may as well go straight to the Super
Bowl....
Jeff
|
61.572 | Road to Super Bowl!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed May 18 1994 12:25 | 27 |
| Here it is guys the Browns road to the Super Bowl!!!!!!!
Sep 4 - at Cincinnati
Sep 11 - Pittsburgh
Sep 18 - Arizona
Sep 25 - at Indianapolis
Oct 2 - New York Jets
Oct 9 - -Bye Week-
Oct 13 - at Houston
Oct 23 - Cincinnati
Oct 30 - at Denver
Nov 6 - New England
Nov 13 - at Philadelphia
Nov 20 - at Kansas City
Nov 27 - Houston
Dec 4 - New York Giants (Super Bowl Preview)
Dec 10 - at Dallas
Dec 18 - at Pittsburgh
Dec 24 - Seattle
There you have it a 14 - 2 seasons for Cleveland!
and Home field advantage in the playoffs!!!!!!!!!
jeff
|
61.573 | maybe backwards | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Wed May 18 1994 12:34 | 5 |
| > Oct 9 - -Bye Week-
One they probably won't lose.
TTom
|
61.574 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 18 1994 13:10 | 1 |
| Giants in the Super Bowl? He must be on drugs.
|
61.575 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Wed May 18 1994 13:13 | 6 |
| >
> Giants in the Super Bowl? He must be on drugs.
>
Even I'll agree with that one. Although I must say the Giants have
emminently more chance than the Browns.....or the Pats ;^)
|
61.576 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 18 1994 13:17 | 4 |
| �Even I'll agree with that one. Although I must say the Giants have
�emminently more chance than the Browns.....or the Pats ;^)
Not with demigod Bill Parcells at the helm...
|
61.577 | Was he part of the "handout program"? ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed May 18 1994 13:51 | 10 |
|
>> Giants in the Super Bowl? He must be on drugs.
Yabbut speaking of drugs, anybody heard from Needle lately?
He's been outa here for a longgggg longgggg time
|
61.578 | DO IT DAWGS!!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed May 18 1994 14:08 | 9 |
| I know that in a earlier note I had predicted a 9-7 season for the
DAWGS. That was before I had a chance to see the schedule. The
schedule clearly indicates a cake walk for the BROWNS this year.
and of course beating the GIANTS in the SUPER BOWL!!!!!
GO DAWGS!!!! WOOF!!!! WOOF!!!! 14 - 2!!!!!
JEFF
|
61.579 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I *did* forget to change the P_N! | Wed May 18 1994 16:39 | 1 |
| so who are the two teams who will crush Clevswamp?
|
61.580 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Wed May 18 1994 16:46 | 14 |
|
>>GO DAWGS!!!! WOOF!!!! WOOF!!!! 14 - 2!!!!!
Ok HAL, come clean and admit you got an account on another machine
under a different name. Reading "Jeff's" notes it's painfully apparent
that either:
1.) There's more than one brain daid Clevescum fan that cain't
read the writing on the wall.
2.) Yer noting in here under your own AND an assumed name.
JaKe
|
61.581 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Wed May 18 1994 16:47 | 13 |
|
>>That's pretty funny coming from an Iron City man.
And this coming from a freakin' RUGBY player.
BTW, what goes in and out and smells of urine???
A 90 year old lady doing the hokey pokey!!!
JaKe
|
61.582 | 10 - 6 is what i say | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed May 18 1994 17:06 | 10 |
|
Sorry Jeff, I can't say the Browns will go 12-2 for the season.
I really think they have a hell of hard schedule at the end. They
are going to have to win at the begining of the season and
hopefully secure a playoff spot early.
go DAWGS!!! WOOF! WOOF!
|
61.583 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Wed May 18 1994 17:09 | 11 |
|
>> -< 10 - 6 is what i say >-
>> Sorry Jeff, I can't say the Browns will go 12-2 for the season.
HAL, you cain't even say if the Brown(spot)s(tm) are going to play 14
or 16 games!!!
JaKe
|
61.584 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | What part of NO dintya unnerstand | Wed May 18 1994 17:59 | 16 |
|
>>That's pretty funny coming from an Iron City man.
Hey MAC,
At least Ahnr City is drinkable and ya cain see thru it.
Clevescum beer resembles peanut butter, and to further confuse ya, it
comes in regular and chunky, too.
All they do is take a shovel and get a scoop of Cuyahoga River water,
add a teaspoon of sugar to it, a little yeast, and put it straight in
the jar...er...can.
JaKe
|
61.585 | Pigsturd SUCKS!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 19 1994 11:24 | 17 |
| re: 584
Hey Jake:
If-n- yer from pigsturd, I dont see hows you can possibly degrade
Cleveland as a dirty city. I have been to pigsturd, and comparing the
two citys Cleveland by far is the cleanest of two. Cleveland biggest
problem was lake Erie. Which had polution problem coming out of
Buffalo, Erie, Toronto, Toledo and Detroit. and the flow of the lake
backed all the polution into Cleveland. Pigsturd has no one to blame
but their selves for the situations there. Yes they are cleaning
pigsturd up. But Cleveland is doing the same. I suggest you get your
collective crap together and get the facts straight before you make
ridiculas statement of the nature. and I "HATES" the Pigsturd
Squeelers. So there!!!!!
|
61.586 | a word from your moderator | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu May 19 1994 11:31 | 2 |
| I think we've had just about enough of this. Can we get back to
talking football?
|
61.587 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Thu May 19 1994 11:36 | 8 |
| > -< a word from your moderator >-
>
> I think we've had just about enough of this. Can we get back to
> talking football?
>
Have Browns fans EVER talked football, Mac????
|
61.588 | Never mind... | HANNAH::ASHE | Home of the driveby noter... | Thu May 19 1994 11:47 | 1 |
| Have they won a superbowl?
|
61.589 | Football Rules!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 19 1994 12:02 | 4 |
| Thank you! I would be glad too...
jeff
|
61.590 | Browns rule the AFC!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 19 1994 12:10 | 10 |
| re: 588
No... My Browns have never won a Super Bowl. We never lost one
either. The Browns will be the next AFC team to win a Super Bowl, the
rest of the teams who have represented the AFC has been a pure
embarrassment. Only the Raiders have saved some respect for the AFC.
The Browns will save the AFC this year!!!
jeff
|
61.591 | Don't stop, don't stop, don't stop! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu May 19 1994 16:57 | 17 |
|
Jeff.....
tm that baby! "pigsturd"
I'm rollllling!!!!
I hope you don't mind me using it in future notes.
Go DAWGS!
WOOF!
|
61.592 | | METSNY::francus | Tommy-Self-proclaimed God of Woofing | Thu May 19 1994 17:03 | 8 |
| Pigsturd Squealers has a very nice ring to it.
Pigsturd Pens almost as nice.
Pigsturd Bucs not as much rhythm but will do just fine.
The Crazy Met
|
61.593 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Thu May 19 1994 17:04 | 19 |
| re.585
Get real Jeff. With the lasted company I worked fer I had to travel to
Clevescum on a regular basis. I been there recently, too(complete with
gas mask and space suit so the toxicity of the hole didn't make me
sicker than I was to be there.
Clevescum is the "victim" of other places waste!! Bullsh_t!!! The
place is a toxic waste dump. The stadium there is painted sludge.
The faux-football team wear uniforms to match what they are, sh_t
brown.
Nuff said
So let's talk football now, so I guess we won't talk about the
Skidmarks of Clevescum.
JaKe
|
61.594 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | TCM - World's Greatest Sandbagger | Thu May 19 1994 17:11 | 3 |
|
The irony of Pittsburghers and Clevelanders arguing about which
town is the bigger sewer is too much.
|
61.595 | stop it man, you're killing me | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu May 19 1994 17:13 | 1 |
|
|
61.596 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Thu May 19 1994 17:14 | 4 |
| True, Boston is a bigger shithole than either of these two.
JaKe
|
61.597 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu May 19 1994 17:15 | 2 |
| It's kinda like the irony of debating whether Nother Shame(tm) or
Florida St. is the BIGGEST CHEAT!
|
61.598 | many examples | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Thu May 19 1994 17:22 | 3 |
| Or who's choking more in the playoffs: Atlanta or Phoenix.
TTom
|
61.599 | | METSNY::francus | Tommy-Self-proclaimed God of Woofing | Thu May 19 1994 17:25 | 6 |
|
Atlanta. They let the Hawks take 'em to 5 in the first series.
Suns at least closed out GS when they had a chance.
The Crazy Met
|
61.600 | snarf | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu May 19 1994 17:27 | 2 |
|
|
61.601 | Atlanta *IS* the Hawks | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu May 19 1994 17:27 | 1 |
| >Atlanta. They let the Hawks take 'em to 5 in the first series.
|
61.602 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Let me see shake yo tailfeather... | Thu May 19 1994 17:28 | 4 |
| Uh, you mean the Heat, not the Hawks, right?
Seattle choked more than either...
|
61.603 | | METSNY::francus | Tommy-Self-proclaimed God of Woofing | Thu May 19 1994 17:28 | 6 |
| umm, right.
Atlanta because they let the Heat take 'em to 5 in the first series.
The Crazy Met
|
61.604 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Thu May 19 1994 17:37 | 13 |
| re.600
Mike, we all know that anybody who uses that terminology to describe
themselves while wasting a perfectly good note is really,
subconsciously saying about themselves:
S everly N eurotic A $$hole R etarded F __kup
- - - - -
I suggest you seek counselling to alleviate your opinion of yerself.
JaKe
|
61.605 | speaking of waste, how ya doing Jake? | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu May 19 1994 17:44 | 1 |
|
|
61.606 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Thu May 19 1994 18:32 | 7 |
| > -< speaking of waste, how ya doing Jake? >-
^^^^^
Okay, I can understand this being in the Cleveland note, but all the
other stuff about atlanta and phoenix doesn't belong here....8^)
|
61.607 | Browns Rule AFC!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 19 1994 18:47 | 14 |
| re: 591
Hal:
I wont be around long enough to bother with the (tm) so I will give you
full rights to "pigsturd". You may use it in way you see fit.
After all the Browns fans have every right slam the pigsturd squealers.
Browns "WILL" go to Super Bowl and beat the Giants!!!!!!
jeff
|
61.608 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Fri May 20 1994 09:46 | 13 |
| >
> After all the Browns fans have every right slam the pigsturd squealers.
> Browns "WILL" go to Super Bowl and beat the Giants!!!!!!
>
This clearly shows how little football knowledge you possess.
I'm a Giants fan, and there's no way they're going to the dance this
year. No way at all.......
'Saw
|
61.609 | Why not. Giants? | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 20 1994 12:46 | 16 |
| re: 608
OK Saw:
Who, but the Giants will represent the NFC at the Dance? The Giants had
a good year last year. Even made the playoffs. The other reasons I
happened to choose the Giants is well Dallas is done, Detroit too
young, Saints too dumb, 49ers too old, Green Bay maybe in a couple,
Vikings not together yet. Giants are a tight unit right now and the
way I see it the only logical choice for the NFC this year to meet the
Browns in the Super Bowl!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jeff
|
61.610 | nuff said | CNTROL::CHILDS | I got them GhostTown Blues | Fri May 20 1994 13:34 | 7 |
| >> <<< Note 61.609 by BSS::J_VANMETER >>>
>> -< Why not. Giants? >-
two words : Dan Reeves...........
mike
|
61.611 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri May 20 1994 13:44 | 4 |
|
|two words : Dan Reeves...........
I dunno mike, it's been a few years since Reeves lost a supe - he's due...
|
61.612 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I got them GhostTown Blues | Fri May 20 1994 14:01 | 5 |
|
if you caught the Giants/Niners' playoff game last year, you'd have noticed
that he's just doing it sooner........
mike
|
61.613 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Fri May 20 1994 14:34 | 22 |
| If you knew anything at all about the Giants you'd know you're full of it.
The defensive line is a sieve, Simms probably won't be back 100% from
shoulder surgery which means one of the young guys will get lots of
OJT.
The receiving corps is untested, the secondary ain't so hot.
Probably foremost, the Offensive line, tentative last year at best, lost
a couple of important cogs to FA.
There's Mike's main point to be considered too: Dan Reeves......
I don't know who will take it in the NFC, but it the AFC *was* going to
win the Bowl, this would be there year.
And the Browns don't stand a chance of getting by: Miami, Buffalo, or LA.....
'Saw
|
61.614 | | MKFSA::LONG | M-O-O-N spells layoff. Laws yes! | Fri May 20 1994 14:35 | 5 |
| IMHO the only bowl game the Giants would meet the Browns in is the
Toilet Bowl!
billl
|
61.615 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Fri May 20 1994 14:38 | 4 |
| > IMHO the only bowl game the Giants would meet the Browns in is the
> Toilet Bowl!
I've made a few giant brown ones in my time.....
|
61.616 | You jolly jokers... | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri May 20 1994 15:25 | 6 |
| |> IMHO the only bowl game the Giants would meet the Browns in is the
|> Toilet Bowl!
|I've made a few giant brown ones in my time.....
Oh, I laughed so hard when I read that, that I was flushed...
|
61.617 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Fri May 20 1994 15:29 | 5 |
| >Oh, I laughed so hard when I read that, that I was flushed...
Don't poo-poo my humor.....
|
61.618 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Fri May 20 1994 16:35 | 14 |
| #### # ########### ## ###########
#### #### #### ### ### #### ###
### ## #### ### ##### #### ###
#### # #### ### # ### #### ###
#### #### ### # ### #### ###
#### ######### # ### #########
#### #### ### ######### ####
#### #### ### # #### ####
### ## #### #### # #### ####
### ## #### #### # #### ####
##### ######## ##### ##### ####### ########
This file is FREEWARE. Use and distribute it far and wide. Design
Copyright (c) 1993 by Northern Spy Software.
|
61.619 | Cleveland rules againt pigsturd | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 20 1994 16:46 | 13 |
| re:618
C=Cleveland R=Reaches A=Alltime P=Pinacle
Beats Giants in Super Bowl!!!!!!
jeff
|
61.620 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Fri May 20 1994 16:53 | 7 |
| >
> Beats Giants in Super Bowl!!!!!!
>
You and Mark Duper man......
|
61.621 | I'm just so titalated by the thoughtful and mature discussion in this note... | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri May 20 1994 17:04 | 0 |
61.622 | S O S | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 23 1994 18:32 | 13 |
| Just a reminder: Browns and Giants in Super Bowl!!
Browns 32 Giants 13
Bet the Ranch!!!!!
Hell, sell the wife and bet that!!!!!!
you heard it here, first...............
jeff
|
61.623 | Send help for Jeff | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Mon May 23 1994 19:00 | 13 |
| > Hell, sell the wife and bet that!!!!!!
I'd have more chance at that then the Browns have in making
the big party. And believe me, I have no chance.
Just a few words to get you back to reality jeff.
"The Drive", "The Fumble",
'nuff said,
flying "love them donkeys" zamboni
|
61.624 | B B B | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Mon May 23 1994 19:25 | 9 |
| RE: 623
gotta go I'll pick on you tommorow.....
GO DAWGS!!!!!
jeff
|
61.625 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Mon May 23 1994 19:35 | 7 |
|
>>you heard it here, first...............
And we're STILL laughing our asses off at that inane prediction!!!
JaKe
|
61.626 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Tue May 24 1994 10:02 | 8 |
| You must be hangin' out with Jennifer Capriati if you're making
predictions like Browns-Giants in the Bowl.
Come to think of it, why don't you send me some of what you're on. I
sure could use it....
'Saw
|
61.627 | Browns rule AFC!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 24 1994 12:24 | 17 |
| re: 623
Sooooo! Your a @#* %#@* Bronco fan.
I'm sorry, The prediction I have made was based on futuristic
scientific calculations. Bronco fans live in the past. The Broncos
are on a roller coaster to hell. They have Bum jr. for a coach, John
"Donkey lips" Elway. You guys kill me. You have the nerve to bring up
"The Fumble" and "The Drive", but never mention the embarrassing
performance in the three Super Bowl appearences. When the Browns may
have at least made it respectable. The Broncos have brought "shame" to
the AFC. At least the Browns have Dignity! In the future my friend,
take my advice abanden ship and pick another team, cant be Cleveland,
ex Elway Nugget eaters are not allowed. Have a nice day!!!!!!
jeff
|
61.628 | Bronco dont have a line,Elway snorted it!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 24 1994 12:39 | 8 |
| re: 625
HEY JAKE:
BPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jeff
|
61.629 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Tue May 24 1994 12:40 | 8 |
|
> The prediction I have made was based on futuristic scientific calculations.
is ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
joke of the day.
The Crazy Met
|
61.630 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | TCM - World's Greatest Sandbagger | Tue May 24 1994 12:42 | 4 |
|
These Pittsburgh-Cleveland debates really bring to mind the
Algonquin Roundtable, don't they?
|
61.631 | Browns Take all | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 24 1994 12:42 | 9 |
| re: 626
Man I'am high on life, and the Browns, life is good because my Browns
will win the Super Bowl!!!!!!
Thank you for your support!!!!!!!!!!
jeff
|
61.632 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Tue May 24 1994 12:44 | 5 |
|
we'll see you in note 50 long before the next Super Bowl is played.
The Crazy Met
|
61.633 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I got them GhostTown Blues | Tue May 24 1994 13:26 | 8 |
|
>> we'll see you in note 50 long before the next Super Bowl is played.
but hopefully we'll see you there first!!!!!!!
;^)
|
61.634 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Tue May 24 1994 13:34 | 6 |
| re: .633
Nah, Knicks will win it all.
The Crazy Met
|
61.635 | Actually | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Tue May 24 1994 13:59 | 20 |
| re: .627
I'd much rather lose the girl at the dance then not to go
at all. When the Broncos lost, it was a matter of being crushed
by a superior team. When the Browns lost to the Broncos, it was
a matter of not being able to pull the trigger when the gun was
locked,loaded and sighted on the target. Choke city.
A buddy of mine is a HUGE Dawgs fan. To the point of
having Browns floor mats for his car. I love wearing dirty
shoes in his car! Over the years he's forced me to watch the
Browns, and I've actually enjoyed it. They're a team I respect,
but they don't know how to win yet when the going gets tough.
I expect the Browns to have another winning season this
year, and will make the playoffs. I don't expect them to advance
past the second round. Depends a lot upon their O-line and
their rotating quarterback.
zamboni
|
61.636 | a_opening | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Tue May 24 1994 14:01 | 6 |
| > A buddy of mine is a HUGE Dawgs fan. To the point of
>having Browns floor mats for his car. ...
There's a slur/joke in here somewhere for JaKe...
TTom
|
61.637 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I got them GhostTown Blues | Tue May 24 1994 14:11 | 5 |
|
did you forget about the Rangers?????? and even if those two advance the
Mets' season will end long before the Dawgs start playing........
mike
|
61.638 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Let me see shake yo tailfeather... | Tue May 24 1994 14:15 | 2 |
| What does he know, he walks around with a shirt that says "Woof" on
it... then again, you do too....
|
61.639 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Tue May 24 1994 14:53 | 8 |
| well, far as I can tell there would be no need for me to
go into note 50 for either the Rangers or Mets. Remember I'm the one who
kept saying watch out for the ghosts of 1940.
The Crazy Met
|
61.640 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | TCM - World's Greatest Sandbagger | Tue May 24 1994 14:55 | 6 |
|
re .639
You're right. Last year, in Mike Heiser's honor, you started
the "Whiney Sore Loser" topic. This year, in your honor, I think
I'll start the "Whiney Sandbagging Wussyman" topic.
|
61.641 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Tue May 24 1994 16:43 | 11 |
|
>>HEY JAKE:
>>BPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPBPB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>jeff
Spoken as only a fan of the turds from Clevescum could.
JaKe
|
61.642 | GET ME TO CAMP ON TIME! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue May 24 1994 16:55 | 29 |
|
Clyde Goode, who will be handling Antonio Langham's contract
negotiations, said the Browns' No.1 draft choice told him just one
thing.
"He said, 'Get me signed and in camp on time,'" chuckled Goode, who
is not only Langham's agent, but also his uncle.
Clyde and his wife, Vernell, raised Antonio from the time he was
about three years old. They also raised three sons of their own who
went on to play in the NFL - Chris, Kerry and Pierre.
While Clyde didn't represent any of them, he did learn the ropes
about NFL contracts. And in this day and age wherein the league
stipulates how much you can pay the draft picks, there really isn't
much likelihood of a player holding out.
"I really don't expect any problems." Goode said.
And when will the negotiating begin?
"Just as soon as they'd like," said Goode, who is a former high
school principal.
He and his wife have also handled investments for family and
friends over the years.
WOOF!
|
61.643 | At least one sensible Dawg fan. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen Sales Support 592-5249 | Tue May 24 1994 18:42 | 4 |
| Never thought I'd enjoy one of Hal's notes but thanks for the information
on the Dogs Hal.
Jeff
|
61.644 | NO 1 BROWNS FAN | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 24 1994 19:17 | 8 |
| Yes. Thanks Hal for the info. Of course the "buttheads" havn't
replied with their usual empty headed remarks. It was nice too read
something with realism for a change. Thanks again Hal.
Go DAWGS!!!!
jeff
|
61.645 | Elway envyism | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Boat+Camper+Beer=Blue Mesa | Tue May 24 1994 20:05 | 9 |
| Go fishin' for 4 days and come back to this?
How many people that were raised in Cleveland would go back and live
there?
Of the 4 people I have met from there, all said no way!!
Tim
|
61.646 | I'd rather be Jamacian | CNTROL::CHILDS | I got them GhostTown Blues | Tue May 24 1994 20:26 | 6 |
|
yeah and Seger said "Get out of Denver babeeeeeeeee"........
all relative another words....
mike
|
61.647 | Alexander Brings More Versatility | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed May 25 1994 08:14 | 37 |
|
One reason the Browns drafted Derric Alexander was his ability to
improve the special teams.
"I think he'll help us in the return game," Bill Belichick said.
"He's just a real quality player. We have to give him some
opportunities in the preseason."
Eric Metcalf, a Pro Bowl selection, has been the club's top punt
returner and will not necessarily give up his job right away.
"We still want to get the ball into Eric's hands as many times as
we can," Belichick said. "We might have an opportunity to use them
both at times."
Alexander tied the University of Michigan record with four punt
returns for touchdowns.
"I like returning punts better," he said, "but I can return
kickoffs, too. It's just that I haven't scored any touchdowns on
kickoff returns and I've scored four on punt returns."
Alexander averaged 17.7 yards per catch as a senior with 19 yards
on his nine kickoff returns.
With kickoffs being moved back to the 30 yard line next year, more
emphasis will be placed on returns.
"The return game is becomming even more significant," Owner Art
Modelll said. "Kicking from the 30 yard line off a one-inch tee will
create a lot more returns than ever before."
It's expected that Alexander will compete with Randy Baldwin for
kickoff returner.
WOOF!
|
61.648 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Wed May 25 1994 13:04 | 16 |
| ...>go into note 50 for either the Rangers
Maybe my memory is a little hazy, but I could have sworn you said the
Rangers would lose out to the Pens, but if they beat the pens then you
would gladly go into note 50. Obviously these two teams did not play,
but the point is that you said the Pens were the ONLY team that could
beat them with that remark. Sounds to me like you might have a need.
Back on the topic, looking at the Browns schedule I would not be too
surprised to see them finish 8-8 or 7-9. The first half is against
teams trying to shake off bad seasons (read: tough games) and the
second half are against good teams. This will be a tough year for the
Browns and their fans.
Marc
|
61.649 | | CAMONE::WAY | Bleaume | Wed May 25 1994 13:12 | 23 |
| > Back on the topic, looking at the Browns schedule I would not be too
> surprised to see them finish 8-8 or 7-9. The first half is against
> teams trying to shake off bad seasons (read: tough games) and the
> second half are against good teams. This will be a tough year for the
> Browns and their fans.
Every year is a tough year for the Browns and their fans.
Belichick doesn't have it down yet -- according to the Hal Theory, he
has to buy lots more equipment and hire on about 6 new assistant
coaches so that they can stay afloat in the NFC Central.
The talent is weak at best and the two guys at the helm couldn't
Quarterback their way out of a wet paper bag. If I wanted a proven
winner, I certainly wouldn't be going with anyone like Vinny Testaverde
or Mark "One Time Wonder" Rypien....
I'd be surprised to see them go 9-7......
'Saw
|
61.650 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 25 1994 13:29 | 8 |
| �Belichick doesn't have it down yet -- according to the Hal Theory, he
�has to buy lots more equipment and hire on about 6 new assistant
�coaches so that they can stay afloat in the NFC Central.
I know they were talking realignment and even having some teams swap
between the two confernces, but I didn't realize it was a done deal
yet. With the Browns moving to the NFC what's going to happen to those
great battles of the .500 AFC Central rivalries?
|
61.651 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Wed May 25 1994 13:33 | 6 |
|
So here I got Tommy accusing me of sandbaggin' and a Clevescum
fan saying the opposite. Come on folks get your act together!
The Crazy Met
|
61.652 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed May 25 1994 13:36 | 5 |
| �So here I got Tommy accusing me of sandbaggin' and a Clevescum
�fan saying the opposite. Come on folks get your act together!
I guess we need to add "wishy washy" to the title of the sandbagging
topic.
|
61.653 | | CAMONE::WAY | Bleaume | Wed May 25 1994 14:56 | 8 |
| re NFC Central vis-a-vis the Browns....
Just a typo -- hell even spellchecker wouldn't grab that one.
Maybe I'd better write an NFL-Checker....
'Saw
|
61.654 | Official "DAWG" watcher! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed May 25 1994 15:38 | 15 |
| F.Y.I.
For you Browns fans in the Colorado Springs area, or for the fans
visiting the area this winter. The Pikes Peak "BROWNS" Backers will
be seeing every game at "The Alumni" lounge this year. So far we have
85 screeming BROWNS fans to see the game every Sunday via satilite
feed. The "Alumni" lounge is located at the corner of S. Academy Blvd
and E. Pikes Peak Ave. Free food buffet for members and discount beer
prices go along with the fun of watching the "DAWGS" fight their way to
the Super Bowl. Come on in and "Join the Fun"!!!!!!!!
Jeff
|
61.655 | | CAMONE::WAY | Bleaume | Wed May 25 1994 15:43 | 9 |
| Well, we know one thing. Cleveland schools can't teach spelling worth
two sh*ts....
Translation for folks from Cleveland:
(Tranlayshun for fulks from Cleevlund)
Well, we no won thing Cleevlund skuuls kent teech spillleng
wurth too shits.
|
61.656 | did RCASO have a son? | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed May 25 1994 16:31 | 1 |
|
|
61.657 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Wed May 25 1994 16:35 | 11 |
|
>>For you Browns fans in the Colorado Springs area, or for the fans
>>visiting the area this winter. The Pikes Peak "BROWNS" Backers will
>>be seeing every game at "The Alumni" lounge this year.
And as at all "Browns"backers meetings, there'll be lots of fudge,
tightly packed.
JaKe
|
61.658 | FEED JAKE | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed May 25 1994 17:37 | 12 |
| Jake: This ones for you pal.
What is the difference between a proctologist and a Browns fan in
Denver?
A proctologist has to put up with one asswhole at a time.
jeff
Go Dawgs!!
|
61.659 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Wed May 25 1994 18:31 | 5 |
| Well lemme see, a Brown(spot)s(tm) fan in Denver is only one asshole in
a very big place.
JaKe
|
61.660 | JaKe didn't dog Denver? Off night? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Big Brown+lots of Kokanee | Wed May 25 1994 22:01 | 5 |
| What, no more Brownies games at the Underground jeff? Did Tony kick
youz guys out?
Ti
|
61.661 | Browns at the Alumni | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 26 1994 12:06 | 16 |
| > What, no more Brownies games at the Underground jeff? Did Tony kick
> youz guys out?
We have been at The Club House for five years now and have grown to
point that parking is a nightmare. We decided to seek another
establishment for parking reasons. The Alumni fit our needs perfectly.
Plus the Alumni is offering a better deal, Tony was just too cheap.
He was charging us $3.50 for Coffee. Tony would not budge with his
prices. We had requested he put on another person to wait tables, one
was not enough with 60 to 85 screaming BROWNS fans to wait on. Anyway
we are happy to be at the Alumni... Come on down and give a visit..
Join the fun. Root the BROWNS to the Super Bowl.......!
jeff
|
61.662 | NOT ON MY WORST HANGOVER!! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Big Brown+lots of Kokanee | Thu May 26 1994 13:55 | 13 |
| My Dad is a regular at the Alumni. I will be sure to tell him to
aviod it on Sunday's, but I'm sure he knows that by now.
I have never had parking problems at the Clubhouse. I park in the
back.
We have thrown real mans darts (steel tips) out of there for 3 years.
We are leaving there do to crappy board arrangement, and Tony refused
to better it. Additionally, alot of the bands in there anymore are too
alternative or just suck!!
Tim
|
61.663 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu May 26 1994 14:02 | 3 |
| What's the name of the circular-shaped sports bar off Academy near the
mall (Chapel Hill?)? I remember it was up on a hill overlooking
Academy.
|
61.664 | BROWNS RULE AFC!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 26 1994 14:09 | 9 |
| > What's the name of the circular-shaped sports bar off Academy near the
> mall (Chapel Hill?)? I remember it was up on a hill overlooking
> Academy.
I believe that would be the "DUBLIN HOUSE". Fun place, The Packer
backers hang out there.
jeff
|
61.665 | Nice place to draft for the FFL | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen Sales Support 592-5249 | Thu May 26 1994 14:12 | 4 |
| Mike;
That would be the Dublin House, Bronco territory Jeff Vanmeter wouldn't dare go
nearwith his Brown spots jersey on.
|
61.666 | Beast Snarf | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu May 26 1994 14:26 | 3 |
| Yeah that's it. Fun place. Had some cute ladies working there last
time I was there. I made a killing off those poor Coloradians in the pool
hall. ;-)
|
61.667 | BROWNS RULE DENVER FROM HERE TO ETERNITY!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 26 1994 14:39 | 14 |
| > That would be the Dublin House, Bronco territory Jeff Vanmeter wouldn't
> dare go nearwith his Brown spots jersey on.
I have live in Colorado about 14 years now, I have worn my BROWNS
attire anywhere and everywhere, even at Piled High Stadium when the
Browns beat the Broncos on Monday night 3 years ago. That was the last
time the BROWNS played at piled high stadium. This year the DENVER
BROWNS BACKERS and the PIKES PEAK BROWNS BACKERS will be attending the
game at piled high on Oct 30, with a full fledge TAIL GATE party
preceeding the game. And you can bet I will be dressed out "BROWNS
DOWN". BROWNS 27 - broncos 3. I dont fear wimps!!!!!
jeff
|
61.668 | | CAMONE::WAY | Bleaume | Thu May 26 1994 14:44 | 10 |
| > game at piled high on Oct 30, with a full fledge TAIL GATE party
Wow.
> preceeding the game. And you can bet I will be dressed out "BROWNS
> DOWN". BROWNS 27 - broncos 3. I dont fear wimps!!!!!
Last time I saw something "browns down" it came out of my ass end.....
|
61.669 | BRWONS, SUPER BOWL BOUND!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 26 1994 14:54 | 6 |
| re: 668
That was your head!!
Go DAWGS!!!!
|
61.670 | | CAMONE::WAY | Bleaume | Thu May 26 1994 15:02 | 23 |
| >
> That was your head!!
>
Hardly. If I could get my head that far back there, it'd mean I could
get it someplace else and if I could do that, I'd never leave the house,
let alone give a damn about football, the Browns, or anything else on TV....
The Browns will suck this year just like they've always sucked.
Bellichick lets his pride get in the way of sound decisions.
They have no quarterback -- they have one who's never come close, and
one who was a one shot wonder.
Their defense is suspect, and Billy B knows nothing about offense.
Look for Modell to freak and fire him mid-season.
The Browns will finish a dismal 3rd in their division behind Houston
and Pittsburgh, with Cincy makin' it really interesting all the way....
|
61.671 | Your a riot or will start one | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Big Brown+lots of Kokanee | Thu May 26 1994 16:38 | 6 |
| jeff doesnt fear wimps? Why would anyone fear the brownies?
jeff, make sure all you stain backers sit in the south stands, and
right in the middle. They love people like you (-)
Tim
|
61.672 | RUNNING BACK COACH | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu May 26 1994 16:48 | 5 |
|
Bill B. doesn't run the offense anymore.....the Browns hired an
offensive coordinator for this season. YES!
WOOF!
|
61.673 | | ROCK::HUBER | File and Forget | Thu May 26 1994 17:46 | 19 |
|
Re .670
While I disagree with the thrust of your note (the Browns should
be mediocre this season, though I wouldn't mind seeing your
prediction come true just to be rid of Belichek), I have to strongly
disagree with one point:
> The Browns will suck this year just like they've always sucked.
They have not "always sucked". From 1946-1964, the Browns were the
best team in football. Since then, they've been undistinguished -
the good teams (Kardiac Kids, late 80's) haven't been quite good
enough, and the bad teams (mid 70's, early 90's) have generally
been a step above the dregs of the league at the time. But the
current mediocrity shouldn't tarnish the accomplishments of earlier
teams...
Joe
|
61.674 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Thu May 26 1994 17:55 | 10 |
|
>>They have not "always sucked". From 1946-1964, the Browns were the
>>best team in football.
Yeah, and dinosaurs ruled the earth, once. But both are ancient
history.
JaKe
|
61.675 | I LIKE HISTORY!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu May 26 1994 18:09 | 11 |
| >> Yeah, and dinosaurs ruled the earth, once. But both are ancient
>> history.
That would put "THE FUMBLE" and "THE DRIVE" in the same history book
now wouldn't it??
Thank You! for your support!!!!
jeff
|
61.677 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Honey, don't pay the ransom, I escaped!! | Thu May 26 1994 18:19 | 12 |
| >>That would put "THE FUMBLE" and "THE DRIVE" in the same history book
>>now wouldn't it??
Nah, it's recent enuf history that it is still in the recesses of what
little brains that Brownscum fans(a$$holes) have.
Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
JaKe
|
61.678 | Better make that '46-57 | AKOCOA::BREEN | Turn down the lights, the parties over | Fri May 27 1994 13:02 | 2 |
| Browns won nfl-east in '57 and giants (eagles in '60) beat them thru
early '60s.
|
61.679 | Get the fax straight!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 27 1994 14:03 | 9 |
| >> Browns won nfl-east in '57 and giants (eagles in '60) beat them thru
>> early '60s.
The Browns won the NFL championship in 1964 27-0 against the Baltimore
Colts. Lost the Championship game against Green Bay in the Mud bowl in
1965(The last game Jim Brown Played).
jeff
|
61.680 | A Way to say it!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Fri May 27 1994 19:32 | 36 |
|
" A BROWNS FANS HEART "
BY
Jeff Van Meter
********
You might say I bragg a bit,
One might say I'm full of Shit.
You might think I'm off my rocker,
Some just wish I'd see a doctor.
I carry a torch, a life-long goal,
To see My Browns in the Super Bowl.
I've been close, my glory near,
Only to take it in the rear.
Dreams live on, sometimes crumble,
case in point, was the "THE FUMBLE"
Pride fights on and will survive,
But then you stab me with "THE DRIVE"
One day I'll make it, My goal at last,
To tell you phucks to kiss my A__..
jeff
|
61.681 | (8^)* | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri May 27 1994 21:43 | 27 |
| >> You might say I bragg a bit,
>> One might say I'm full of Shit.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We don't say it, we KNOW it.
>> I carry a torch, a life-long goal,
>> To see My Browns in the Super Bowl.
There ain't enuf gas in the world, and you ain't gonna live long enuf
to see them in anything but the TOILET bowl.
>> I've been close, my glory near,
>> Only to take it in the rear.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Ya, but you Brownscum fans like taken it that way, anyways.
>> One day I'll make it, My goal at last,
>> To tell you phucks to kiss my A__..
Mark a spot, yer ALL a$$.
Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
JaKe
|
61.682 | raising the literary level of ::SPROTS to a new heights | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Tue May 31 1994 09:57 | 1 |
| Oh, now my life is complete...
|
61.683 | | CAMONE::WAY | Bleaume | Tue May 31 1994 10:07 | 20 |
| > They have not "always sucked". From 1946-1964, the Browns were the
> best team in football. Since then, they've been undistinguished -
> the good teams (Kardiac Kids, late 80's) haven't been quite good
> enough, and the bad teams (mid 70's, early 90's) have generally
> been a step above the dregs of the league at the time. But the
> current mediocrity shouldn't tarnish the accomplishments of earlier
> teams...
Ancient history, Joe.
Football is a what have you done for me lately game. The Packers
were probably the best football team of the 60s and the Steelers
in the 70s, but these days, that don't count for squat.
The Browns will suck this year, just like they have for the past
bunch o' years....
'SAw
|
61.684 | | CAMONE::WAY | Bleaume | Tue May 31 1994 10:08 | 13 |
| >
> " A BROWNS FANS HEART "
>
> BY
>
> Jeff Van Meter
>
********
Don't give up the day job, Jeff....
|
61.685 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue May 31 1994 10:12 | 8 |
|
> Football is a what have you done for me lately game.
Unless you are and always will be a Baltimore Colts fan. If that's the
case, the world ended in 1984 (or maybe even in 1971...)
glenn
|
61.686 | only a Browns fan | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue May 31 1994 13:48 | 2 |
| that's priceless. He blanks out the S's in ass but spells out the
profanity.
|
61.687 | What does PA stand for? Pigs Ass? | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Tue May 31 1994 18:21 | 32 |
| re. 681
Hey Jake;
I marked the spot, and I wait.
......................................
Dawgs 52, Pisgturd 0.
member that one Jake.
I just have two things too say to you Jake.
Eric Metcalf.
Have a gooooooooooood day..
jeff
|
61.688 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Tue May 31 1994 20:07 | 14 |
|
>>I just have two things too say to you Jake.
>>Eric Metcalf.
I have 4 things fer you, oh brainless one,
Last season.....new season.
JaKe
|
61.689 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Wed Jun 01 1994 09:45 | 5 |
| Boy, reading these replies I'm going to buy you all "Hooked on Phonics"
for Christmas.
That and this PC software that I found "Fun with Spelling" and
"Fun with Grammar".....
|
61.690 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jun 01 1994 11:40 | 1 |
| 'Saw, have you seen any software that does an intelligence check?
|
61.691 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Jun 01 1994 12:44 | 7 |
|
> Saw, have you seen any software that does an intelligence check?
Sure, anything that prompts for a username or user id.
|
61.692 | | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed Jun 01 1994 13:05 | 2 |
|
|
61.693 | Forget what we enjoy!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed Jun 01 1994 13:09 | 17 |
|
re; 688
>> Last season.....new season
Make a deal with ya jake.
I'll forget the past, if you do!
.................................
Dont forget to check my spelling Saw.
jeff
|
61.694 | apostrophe police - sitting in for the Cadets | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Wed Jun 01 1994 13:24 | 6 |
|
> Dont forget to check my spelling Saw
Don't
The Crazy Met
|
61.695 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 01 1994 14:00 | 3 |
| Re: Fun with Grammar
That sounds sick! We should respect our elders!
|
61.696 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Wed Jun 01 1994 16:44 | 11 |
|
>>Make a deal with ya jake.
>>I'll forget the past, if you do!
Okay.
The Brown(spot)s(tm) STILL SUCK!!!!!!
JaKe
|
61.697 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Wed Jun 01 1994 17:20 | 13 |
| >
> 'Saw, have you seen any software that does an intelligence check?
>
Actually, at various times and various places I've seen some cool
intelligent systems, but in the context you're looking for, no.
re Jeff's spelling:
If you'd figure out how it all works, I wouldn't have to
check it....
|
61.698 | DAWG DAY AFTERNOON! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Thu Jun 02 1994 13:59 | 15 |
| Well guys; I got the word last night. I'm outta here! tommorrow.
Let me say I have enjoyed all of the word wars I have participated in
with you buttheads. Try not to pick on HAL to severely, after all this
is the DAWGS note file and HAL is a DAWG fan. Please remember my
prediction, Browns beat Giants in SUPER BOWL! I wish everyone good
luck in your DIGITAL careers and life. Keep your chin up. My nickles
worth of free advise is get your resumes together, because this is a
company headed for death, act now before it is too late.
Seeya guys, and GO DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JEFF
|
61.699 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:13 | 4 |
| Best of luck Jeff.
The Crazy Met
|
61.700 | BARF | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:28 | 1 |
|
|
61.701 | | MKFSA::LONG | Dancin' INSIDE the fire | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:30 | 7 |
| re .700:
>> Title: SNARF
Considering the topic, shouldn't that be BARF?
billl
|
61.702 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:41 | 12 |
| Jeez, Jeff, that's not fair.
Whose spelling can I correct now? Who can I accuse of being on drugs
for thinking that the Giants would make it to the Super Bowl????
Well, best o' luck to you, matey! Keep the breeze at your back and
sun on your face, and don't ever sign on under a skipper named Ahab
(or Robbie Bob!)......
take care,
'Saw
|
61.703 | The 'Cadets are gonna miss you | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu Jun 02 1994 15:44 | 5 |
| Jeff
Good luck in that your new job as an English professor.
=Bob=
|
61.704 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Thu Jun 02 1994 16:47 | 8 |
| Jeff, why leave so soon. You were just what this note needed, more
blind optimism concerning the hapless Brown(spot)s(tm) and their plight
towards the bottom of the AFC Central again this year.
Good Luck
JaKe
|
61.705 | From a Steeler fan | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Jun 02 1994 17:35 | 4 |
| Good Luck Jeff. While you and Hal haven't exactly been the most objective
or realistic Brown(spot)s(tm) noters, you have been very entertaining.
Keith
|
61.706 | Browns camp '94 | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Jul 20 1994 08:46 | 34 |
|
Well, the training camps have opened...and...at the Browns camp...
Clay Mathews and Mike Johnson are not in Cleveland
uniforms.
Hopes are high in Browns teritory this season and as I've read in
several mags, the Browns are picked to finish 3rd in the Central.
Contrary to the mags picks, the Browns hope to make the playoffs,
well, not really hope but EXPECT the Browns to make the playoffs.
Tupa is expected to handle the punting duties.
Vinnie will take the helm.
Bernie is forgotten....almost.
Mark Rypkin can win as backup....if he has anything left.
Byner will be good veteran leadership....if he doesn't get the
ball.
The offensive line is the best in years.
Vardell and Metcalf are both to have banner year.
Stover is a rock.
The DL is the best it can get.
Secondary will be lead by mad man Turner who will be an all pro.
Biggest question is ... Linebacker ...
From what I have heard, the Browns will have a throwback game
durring one of their pre-season matchups this year where they will
wear the unifor of the 1964 team and Leroy Kelly will receive his
Hall of Fame ring durring the halftime.
WOOF! WOOF!
|
61.707 | | CAMONE::WAY | Come to Butt-head | Wed Jul 20 1994 09:56 | 1 |
| Same as '93, but Hal just changed the dates....8^)
|
61.708 | :*) | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Wed Jul 20 1994 10:45 | 5 |
|
If I EVER catch the guy who taught Hal what a "form feed"
is.......
Claybone
|
61.709 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Jul 20 1994 11:21 | 10 |
|
Hal,
You don't really believe this team is going to make the playoffs
do ya? You sound like a Red Sox fan in April?
Chap
|
61.710 | Not as bad as years past | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Welcome to the Machine | Sun Jul 24 1994 10:33 | 7 |
| Hal,
Get your excuse list ready for after the Oct. 30th game at Mile Hi!!
Where's your sidekick Iceman?
Tim
|
61.711 | Ny goes down.....again | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Aug 09 1994 08:44 | 9 |
|
The Dawgs continue to domminate the NY Giants!!!
WOOF!
Playoffs....here we come! What a team these Browns are!
|
61.712 | | CAMONE::WAY | Try 664/668, Neighborhood of The Beast | Tue Aug 09 1994 09:51 | 20 |
| >
>
> The Dawgs continue to domminate the NY Giants!!!
>
>
I finally figured it out. Hal is like that comedian Norm Crosby who always
mis-uses words.
Hal, look up domination, put the definition in here (Websters will do nicely)
and then back up your use of the word with some statistics.
Even with the win the other evening, I'm sure your "domination" statistics
will fail as miserably as they did last year when you made the same wildly
unsubstantiated statement....
'Saw
|
61.713 | A winner.......28-20 | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Sep 06 1994 08:19 | 24 |
|
Well, the Browns managed to win their opener. They didn't do it
with their offense but did it with their special teams play.
A kickoff return and a punt return for TD's. 1st time in NFL
history. Another 1st for the Browns.....1st team in NFL history
to score the two pointer after a TD. Tom Tupa ran the ball in
for the score. The hole was so big that a truck could have gone
through it.
Vinnie didn't have that great of a game but there were several
passes dropped. Leroy Hoard was the offensive star of the game.
He ran well but did fumble the ball twice, not losing either.
Antonio Langman, Browns #1 draft pick this year...started the game
and intercepted the pass in the endzone to lock the game.
In my opinion, the Browns have a long way to go if they plan on
making the playoffs. Not sure of how next week will go.
WOOF!
|
61.714 | trivia | CSC32::J_HENSON | and it's still too short! | Tue Sep 06 1994 10:21 | 4 |
| Congratulations to the Brownies. They are now the answer to the trivia
question "Who was the first NFL team to score a 2 point conversion?".
Jerry
|
61.715 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Wed Sep 07 1994 00:39 | 6 |
61.716 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Wed Sep 07 1994 01:03 | 9 |
| hey Groaner, nice to see ya in here early, but when the rabid mutts are
eliminated from playoff contention in week 12, I doubt you'll show yer
face in here.
gloat now, but there's still 15 games to go, and the mongrels from
Clevescum ain't gonna win 9 games this year.
JaKe
|
61.717 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Sep 07 1994 09:59 | 7 |
|
> Congratulations to the Brownies. They are now the answer to the trivia
> question "Who was the first NFL team to score a 2 point conversion?".
Didn't the NFL have the 2 point conversion early on in its history?
Joe
|
61.718 | Good Luck Browns (Metcalf/Hoard could have big years) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Sep 07 1994 14:05 | 22 |
| Congrats to the Browns, sitting alone on top of the division with a
big game at home vs Pittsburg this week, good luck.
Pittsburg didnt look too impressive, Cleveland may have got a little
lucky with 2 returns for TD's but metcalf gives them that extra kick.
I bet Pittsburg Special team coach is having a field day with game
films.. KICK AWAY FROM METCALF :-)
Good Luck, no one else in the cental looks all that great maybe this
will be the Dawgs year to win the division (Is Cody out this week in
Houston @ Dallas).
A Cleveland win could put them up 2 games (2 divisional games) after
the first 2 weeks.. Who could ask for anything more :-)
Good Luck (No more rooting for Houston now that they dumped Moon).
Pittsburg(All Sports) have that 1 player that makes you mad, what did
green do for pittsburg this past weekend ? 2 Reception he's earning
his money...
MaB
|
61.719 | No more said.... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:14 | 5 |
|
Vinnie Sucks!
Grrrrrrr...
|
61.720 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 12 1994 10:55 | 12 |
| > -< No more said.... >-
>
>
> Vinnie Sucks!
>
>
> Grrrrrrr...
>
Oh c'mon Hal.... Vinny Greenhead just lived up to the legacy of his
predecessor yesterday.......
|
61.721 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Mon Sep 12 1994 11:16 | 1 |
| Yabut his predecessor has a ring :-)
|
61.722 | plenty more to say | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sorry, wrong species. | Mon Sep 12 1994 11:18 | 10 |
| > -< No more said.... >-
> Vinnie Sucks!
Come on, there's blame enough to go around. How 'bout that coach that
demanded that he be given the reins, gives Bernie the boot and signs on
with a_underchiever.
Then there's the idiot owner.
TTom
|
61.723 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Sep 12 1994 12:09 | 15 |
|
Re .720
> Oh c'mon Hal.... Vinny Greenhead just lived up to the legacy of his
> predecessor yesterday.......
Huh? Say what you will about Kosar, but he never has thrown many
interceptions, which seems to be Vinny's primary skill (and certainly
was the one he chose to display yesterday).
I can see it now - Vinny gets pulled near the end of thee game next
week for Rypien, then when Rypien gets injured, Vinny is released
for "diminishing skills".
Joe
|
61.724 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 12 1994 12:24 | 17 |
| >
> Huh? Say what you will about Kosar, but he never has thrown many
> interceptions, which seems to be Vinny's primary skill (and certainly
> was the one he chose to display yesterday).
>
Nope, at one point (maybe still) he was listed as the least intercepted of
all time.
I meant the bigger picture -- "loser"....
> I can see it now - Vinny gets pulled near the end of thee game next
> week for Rypien, then when Rypien gets injured, Vinny is released
> for "diminishing skills".
That's funny Joe....8^)
|
61.725 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Mon Sep 12 1994 12:28 | 6 |
|
Kosar 308 attemps without and interception
Starr 294
George 277 and counting........
mike
|
61.726 | Jeff George Gunning for the record | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Sep 12 1994 14:20 | 9 |
| Does Kosar have the record ? He will throw mid 30s to low 40s on most
giving days in Atlanta, he could actually reach him next week VS the
Mighty KC Defense.. Id say he's in trouble KC defense is Great...
He's one of the QB's I feel bad for, funny I felt bad for Dickerson
in Indy and George in Indy ... Maybe Indy will never be a great team
but man is Faulk fun to watch, I hope we get some live indy games on
the Tube soon..
mab
|
61.727 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 12 1994 14:35 | 3 |
| Indy will never be a great team because of how they left Baltimore.
They cursed themselves......
|
61.728 | My view of the Brown(spot)s(tm) | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Mon Sep 12 1994 16:42 | 11 |
| Tee-Hee
Hee-haa
HAW HAW
Gufaw-hahahahahahahahahahahahahah
JaKe
|
61.729 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | QUIET--case study in progress | Tue Sep 13 1994 18:37 | 7 |
|
Cards win their first this week.
This is backed up by a (unneccesary) pledge to visit the crow banquet
hall should it not happen.
boC
|
61.730 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Sep 13 1994 19:01 | 3 |
| Buddy says the Cards are playing hard, they just haven't figured out
how to win yet. Makes you wonder who he's gonna hire to teach them,
and what is involved in teaching players how to win...
|
61.731 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Chapter 11? | Thu Sep 15 1994 11:47 | 3 |
| Kosar has a ring, but didn't really do anything to earn it!
Tim
|
61.732 | significant action | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sorry, wrong species. | Thu Sep 15 1994 12:14 | 6 |
| > Kosar has a ring, but didn't really do anything to earn it!
Hail he dint! He got hisself outta Cleveburg and onto a winner's roster
in Dallas.
TTom
|
61.733 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Thu Sep 15 1994 12:28 | 6 |
|
And he helped Troy put on his skirt!
Chappy
|
61.734 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu Sep 15 1994 14:26 | 3 |
| Vinny threw 4 INT's last week against Pittsburgh. This week he faces
the #1 defense in the NFL. With these potent offenses, the final score
will probably be 3-2.
|
61.735 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Sep 15 1994 14:41 | 8 |
|
> Vinny threw 4 INT's last week against Pittsburgh. This week he faces
> the #1 defense in the NFL. With these potent offenses, the final score
> will probably be 3-2.
Nah, the defenses/special teams will score more than that... B^)
Joe
|
61.736 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | No more notes;-( | Fri Sep 16 1994 17:15 | 1 |
| What do you mean he got out of brownieland? He was ousted!!!
|
61.737 | Looked good..... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Sep 19 1994 08:43 | 5 |
|
Defense is the name of this game......32-0.
WOOF!
|
61.738 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Follically Challenged!! | Mon Sep 19 1994 11:43 | 9 |
|
>> Defense is the name of this game......32-0.
It sorta helped the Brown(spot)s(tm) that the Cards have no offense to
speak of.
JaKe
|
61.739 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Sep 19 1994 11:58 | 5 |
| re: Cards Offense
Great move inserting the "winner" Jim McMahon as QB.
Whatta stiff.
|
61.740 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Sep 19 1994 12:23 | 18 |
|
The really scarry thing is how close the game was statistically...
Rushing - Arizona 17 att, 63 yds; Cleveland 27 att, 79 yards
Passing - Arizona 255 yds, Cleveland 243 yds.
Kick returns - Arizona 94 yds; Cleveland 43 yds.
Fumbles lost - Arizona 0; Cleveland 1.
Sacks - Arizona 1; Cleveland 2.
Penalties/yards - Arizona 7/66; Cleveland 8/50.
The one big difference is interception returns (Arizona 0 yds;
Cleveland 103 yds), but take away Turner's return (and the 7 points
that generated) and the stats look nearly the same.
Testaverde had a good game, and the Browns won, but Vinny still isn't
a decent NFL QB, and Bellichek still isn't a decent NFL coach.
Joe
|
61.741 | (8^)* | PTOS01::JACOBR | Follically Challenged!! | Mon Sep 19 1994 12:25 | 11 |
| re-.1
>>Testaverde had a good game, and the Browns won, but Vinny still isn't
>>a decent NFL QB, and Bellichek still isn't a decent NFL coach.
And Clevescum still isn't a decent city!!!
JaKe
|
61.742 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Sep 19 1994 13:07 | 17 |
|
> >>Testaverde had a good game, and the Browns won, but Vinny still isn't
> >>a decent NFL QB, and Bellichek still isn't a decent NFL coach.
> And Cleveland still isn't a decent city!!!
> JaKe
Why, JaKe, you're right. Cleveland isn't a decent city. It's a
wonderful city, rebuilt anew after the turbulence and troubles
of the 70s. Thank you ever so much for pointing this out - it's
a point often missed by the people of this country, particularly
those from Pittsburgh.
Joe
B^)
|
61.743 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Follically Challenged!! | Mon Sep 19 1994 15:13 | 4 |
| Cleveland, the world's only inhabitated toxic waste dump.!!!!
JaKe
|
61.744 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Sep 19 1994 16:41 | 19 |
|
Well, fine, if you're going to be that way...
Back in the 70s or 80s, a fair amount of engineering work
at Cornell went into finding a type of steel that could be
used in the smog & other air contamination of Pittsburgh
without rusting. They found one; as a result Pittsburgh's
structures can now look just as nice as those in the rest of
the world. To celebrate the discovery, a building was built
at Cornell using the same material. In no time, the building
had acquired an ugly, rust tint, and remains easily the
ugliest building on campus. It seems that the steel was
only of use in Pittsburgh; elsewhere the lack of air
contamination caused as many problems as the air contamination
caused with regular steel in Pittsburgh.
BTW - Cornell beat Princeton Saturday 27-7? (Homecoming) Go Red! B^)
Joe
|
61.745 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Sep 19 1994 19:04 | 3 |
61.746 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Follically Challenged!! | Mon Sep 19 1994 19:08 | 16 |
| The air quality "problem" in Pitsburgh is a common misconception, left
over from the days when Pittsburgh was a big producer of steel. These
days, there is only 1 working mill within the city limits, and only a
few more within a 50 miles radius. Many of the older buildings around
here had a black tinge to them, the results fo all of the coal that the
mills used to burn.
The air quality around here nowadays is as clean as you can find in a
city of this size, the result of the mill that still survives adhering
to tougher regulations, and the other mills heading south for the
cheaper labor. Cleveland, however, remains the mistake on the lake.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
61.747 | | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Mon Sep 19 1994 19:09 | 5 |
|
Cool. The left and right armpits are arguing about which smells worse...
;)
|
61.748 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Sep 19 1994 19:09 | 1 |
| Now if they could only regulate the methane over Jake's house!
|
61.749 | (8^)* | PTOS01::JACOBR | Follically Challenged!! | Mon Sep 19 1994 19:10 | 14 |
| >> <<< Note 61.745 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Indians in 1994" >>>
Gronowski, the only one who cain understand the following, it might
make some sense if I'd ever met you, you a__hole.
>>Pittsburgh - the only town where people look like bowling pins.
You must have some fetish regarding bowling pins, what, you sitting on
one right now, I bet!!
JaKe
|
61.750 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Fri Sep 23 1994 00:45 | 10 |
61.751 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Fri Sep 23 1994 00:45 | 4 |
61.752 | Schnorttt schittt Schleppps | PTOS02::JACOBR | Follically Challenged!! | Fri Sep 23 1994 01:07 | 7 |
| re.751
the Brownsbackers always meet at the local sewage plant fer dinner.
JaKe
|
61.753 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Fri Sep 23 1994 12:10 | 12 |
61.754 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Fri Sep 23 1994 12:59 | 14 |
|
A great line in today's Boston Globe:
"Vinny Testaverde of the Bowns is the lowest-rated quarterback
of the AFC, at 60.2. This is incredible, especially since you
get 60 points just for signing you name to the ratings sheet."
HAHAHAHAHA..... :-)
JimH
|
61.755 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Fri Sep 23 1994 13:12 | 2 |
61.756 | Yea, right | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Sep 23 1994 14:25 | 13 |
|
Another funny thing is that the USA today says that Vinnie has
looked impressive.
Really...??? What games has this guy watched?
The offense looked good only because the defense played great!!!
The D may well be the best the Browns have had in years. They
awesome last week!
WOOF!
|
61.757 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Fri Sep 23 1994 18:03 | 4 |
61.758 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Fri Sep 23 1994 18:05 | 3 |
61.759 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Sun Sep 25 1994 17:31 | 24 |
61.760 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Sep 26 1994 09:31 | 9 |
61.761 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Mon Sep 26 1994 10:40 | 5 |
| Wonder if this schmuck will still be chest-puffing in here
when the Brownies drop below .500? I doubt it.
billl
|
61.762 | Schedule has been favorable... No questions there | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Sep 26 1994 12:16 | 15 |
| Ok so the browns have beat the 0-4 bengals the 0-3 cardinals and the
1-3 Colts... Yes a combined 1-10 record, sometime the schedule goes
against you, sometime (like this time) it doesnt.
But look at it this way, with how bad there QB has played, and I think
there #1 WR from last year (Jackson) is hurt theyve managed to go 3-1.
If Jackson comes back (at 100%) and vinney turns his season around,
there defense and Metcalf (Special Teams/Running) could get them into
the playoffs.
Metcalf is awsome, still waiting for him to lead the league in scoring
(One of these years)...
mab
|
61.763 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Sep 26 1994 12:35 | 19 |
61.764 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Sep 26 1994 12:37 | 4 |
61.765 | don't worry, Groaner will be gone in 5 weeks | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Sep 26 1994 12:53 | 7 |
| Groaner predicted the Brownspots would go 15-1 last season. He
disappeared from SPROTS around midseason. We were truly concerned for
his life. We even hired a private investigator. Turns out he was
hiding in under the same rock he did the season before when he bailed
out on the Brownspots in true midseason form.
Mike
|
61.766 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Sep 26 1994 12:53 | 14 |
|
Now that the Browns are 3-1 against teams that are a combined 1-10,
I guess it's time for the Mistake On The Lake, the city that loosed
Don King on the world, Cleveland, to stage it's annual 1/4 of the way
into the season celebratory parade. To be followed, as sure as winter
follows autumn, by the annual teary-eyed, bewildered, what-the-hell-
happened, slope-shouldered walk in small circles when whatever Cleve-
land team is in season goes down in a ball of flames. Naturally, Cleve-
landers will be forced to hark back to over thirty years ago to the last time
that one of their teams won a title in a major sport and cries of "Have
the <fill in the blank> ever won a NFL championship?" will once again fill
the air. I just love the change of seasons.
|
61.767 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:10 | 5 |
61.768 | whatever you say | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:12 | 2 |
| Funny how that EV5 chip comes out during the middle of every NFL
season.
|
61.769 | My pappy has eyes | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:18 | 3 |
| Hey Groaner...any congrats in order?
Mark.
|
61.770 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:20 | 8 |
|
>> Funny how that EV5 chip comes out during the middle of every NFL
>> season.
Or whenever the Cavs go into their post-season tailspin. Or when-
ever the Indians make a run at being triple digits out of first
place. Speaking of bandwagon jumpers, nice to see the Indians av-
erage attendance go from 40 to 40,000 with the new stadium.
|
61.771 | Going straight for the jugular | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:34 | 13 |
| re .766
> I guess it's time for the Mistake On The Lake, the city that loosed
> Don King on the world, Cleveland, to stage it's annual 1/4 of the way
Ohhh, Tommy, you don't pull your punches even a bit. That's like reminding
Dallas of the School Book Depository.
Groaner, if you can handle that blow, you can handle anything. But I wish
to hell you'd change your p-name: every time I see it, tears well up in
my eyes.
Steve
|
61.772 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:53 | 7 |
61.773 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Sep 26 1994 15:28 | 27 |
|
> Now that the Browns are 3-1 against teams that are a combined 1-10,
> I guess it's time for the Mistake On The Lake, the city that loosed
> Don King on the world, Cleveland, to stage it's annual 1/4 of the way
> into the season celebratory parade.
Huh? Cleveland teams have not shown a tendency for fast starts &
slow fades. This year it looks like a possibility for the Browns;
last year it was reality for the Browns. Before that, it's been
a while.
> Naturally, Cleve-
> landers will be forced to hark back to over thirty years ago to the last time
> that one of their teams won a title in a major sport
Just to nitpick...
Soccer is a major sport.
The Crunch won the NASL championship earlier this year.
The Crunch are a soccer team.
Therefore, the last time that a Cleveland team won a title in a major
sport was 1994.
Joe
|
61.774 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Sep 26 1994 17:02 | 7 |
| Nah you know better than that; soccer is not a major sport in the US;
last I heard the US was still willing to acknowledge that Cleveland was
part of the country. JaKester, maybe you should petition Congress to
remedy that error.
The Crazy Met
|
61.775 | RollerBrawl | HBAHBA::HAAS | australopithecus westvirginius | Mon Sep 26 1994 18:21 | 7 |
| Not only is soccer not major, but there's a growing cadre of people who
seriously doubt that it's even a sport.
Now, shrink the field, give 'em something to whack each other, maybe some
motorcycles and you might have something.
TTom
|
61.776 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Sep 26 1994 18:41 | 3 |
61.777 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Sep 26 1994 18:55 | 1 |
| Hockey is 100x more major than soccer in the U.S.
|
61.778 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Mon Sep 26 1994 22:34 | 7 |
61.779 | Hockey >>>>> Soccer | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Tue Sep 27 1994 08:27 | 8 |
|
Paul....
ABC does hockey and the NHL has signed to do the same type of deal
with fox this year. Sorry man hockey is a major sport.
Jerry
|
61.780 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 27 1994 09:39 | 15 |
| >> Just to nitpick...
>> Soccer is a major sport.
>> The Crunch won the NASL championship earlier this year.
>> The Crunch are a soccer team.
>> Therefore, the last time that a Cleveland team won a title in a major
>> sport was 1994.
I suppose that if my teams had waddled in futility for the last 30
years that I'd cling to something as tenuous as an NASL title as
something to be proud of. Fortunately, I ain't that hard up.
|
61.781 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Sep 27 1994 10:05 | 19 |
|
Now wait just a second...
I did _not_ say that soccer is a major sport in the US. It isn't.
But it _is_ a major sport.
> I suppose that if my teams had waddled in futility for the last 30
> years that I'd cling to something as tenuous as an NASL title as
> something to be proud of. Fortunately, I ain't that hard up.
It's not "hard up"; I'd certainly be a lot more excited about the
Tribe winning a World Series, but even if the Tribe, Browns, and
Cavs all start winning championships with regularity, I'll still be
rooting for the Crunch as well. You can limit your rooting to
the sports you like; I'll limit it to those I like. And for me, that
includes following pro teams from NE Ohio.
Joe
|
61.782 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Sep 27 1994 10:42 | 9 |
| I've noticed that a lot of towns in Ohio have the word "Heights" in their
name.
Are they all like in one area that's higher than everything else?
I've always wondered about that.....
'Saw
|
61.783 | Beware nosebleeds in Cleveland Heights!!! | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:04 | 21 |
|
>I've noticed that a lot of towns in Ohio have the word "Heights" in their
>name.
>
>Are they all like in one area that's higher than everything else?
Yes 'Saw, my sister lived in Cleveland Heights for several
years. The heights are a good 30 to 40 foot higher in elevation
than the city of Cleveland. Fortunately it isn't high enough
to have a view of the lake! :-)
As for the Cleveland Crunch/Major Sport topic. Somebody ought
to cross-post that note to the ::UNAMERICAN_FOOTBALL Notesfile
and let us all know how long it takes for the laughter to die down
over in Europe!!!! :-)
JimH
|
61.784 | Grasping Big Time | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:33 | 7 |
| Soccer a Major Sport, more then Hockey.. Thats a good one...
So which state won the last major Tractor Pull Championship?
Hey thats a major sport :-)
mab
|
61.785 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:40 | 20 |
|
> As for the Cleveland Crunch/Major Sport topic. Somebody ought
> to cross-post that note to the ::UNAMERICAN_FOOTBALL Notesfile
> and let us all know how long it takes for the laughter to die down
> over in Europe!!!! :-)
I guess I'm still not making myself clear.
Fact #1: soccer is, within the scope of the Earth, a major sport.
Fact #2: the Crunch won their soccer league this past year.
Therefore, Cleveland has won a championship in a major sport recently.
Now, I'm not implying that an NASL championship is any more significant
than a Greek Basketball league championship; it isn't.
But in a literal sense, the original statement was false.
Joe
|
61.786 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:47 | 20 |
| >
> Soccer a Major Sport, more then Hockey.. Thats a good one...
>
> So which state won the last major Tractor Pull Championship?
>
> Hey thats a major sport :-)
Actually, world wide, it is. Much more than hockey.
I watched a bit of European hockey when I was in France, and the caliber
of play seemed more on par with European basketball. It wasn't bad, it
just wasn't NHL caliber.
Funny Mab, but the way you come across, I thought for sure you'd know
all about tractor pulls and stuff like that.....8^)
'Saw
|
61.787 | Not exactly World Championship | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Sep 27 1994 12:28 | 7 |
| No offense Joe but the fact that cleveland won a championship in soccer
is on par with a minor league team winning their basebal championship.
Now if Brazil, Italy, Germany et al were involved then you would have
something...
Frank
|
61.788 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Sep 27 1994 12:40 | 14 |
|
> No offense Joe but the fact that cleveland won a championship in soccer
> is on par with a minor league team winning their basebal championship.
None taken; I mostly agree. I still think a Greek Basketball league
or European hockey league is a better analogy - it's the highest level
of competition in the respective country, but clearly a step below the
highest level of competition in the world.
I was just nitpicking the original statement, which said...
Oh never mind.
Joe
|
61.789 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Sep 27 1994 12:43 | 4 |
| > Soccer (indoor) gets as much coverage on cable TV as hockey, and
> NEITHER have a contract with a major network. Hockey, I can see
The NHL has a contract with Fox.
|
61.790 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Indians in 1994 | Tue Sep 27 1994 12:48 | 6 |
61.791 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 27 1994 13:17 | 12 |
| (saw) I can one honestly say Ive never, ever watched a Truck/tractor
or skateboard pull of any size shape or color, never went to a monster
truck rally, never seen soccer live either.
It pretty much a givin that the 4 major sports are Football/baseball
Hockey/basketball. Thats a given, and when someone in the states says
major sport they mean those 4 sports ONLY....
So trying to bring in soccer is like trying to bring in truck pulls
the 4 major sports are the only major sports in this country..
mab
|
61.792 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Sep 27 1994 13:39 | 19 |
| >
> It pretty much a givin that the 4 major sports are Football/baseball
> Hockey/basketball. Thats a given, and when someone in the states says
> major sport they mean those 4 sports ONLY....
>
> So trying to bring in soccer is like trying to bring in truck pulls
> the 4 major sports are the only major sports in this country..
>
Given says who? And can you speak for Everyman? Gawd I hope not....
Those four sports are major in the US, and perhaps Canada. Can you
say that they are major in Europe or the Far East? I think not.
I've never seen a truck pull either.... well, wait a minute. I did
use my truck to pull some stumps once. Does that count?
|
61.793 | Auto Racing? | PTOS01::SCHRAMME | | Tue Sep 27 1994 13:41 | 6 |
|
I heard/read somewhere that Auto Racing is the largest (or followed the
most) sport in the World? Any ideas?
Eric
|
61.794 | | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Tue Sep 27 1994 13:54 | 6 |
|
And don't forget the #1 participant sport in the US -- bowling.
MB's youthful exuberance is not only entertaining, but it makes me
appreciate something that comes with age... perspective.
|
61.795 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Sep 27 1994 13:59 | 17 |
| >MB's youthful exuberance is not only entertaining, but it makes me
>appreciate something that comes with age... perspective.
One thing that really opened my eyes was spending that 6 months in
France.
It's interesting to see how we (Americans) are perceived through others
eyes, and see that as much as we might like to think it, we're not the
only place in the world.
Age has helped too. As I've stated in here before, I grew more after
30 than before. Blows me away too, when I think back on it....
Mab is still wet behind the ears.....
|
61.796 | What was the over/under? 15 roots??? | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Tue Sep 27 1994 14:12 | 16 |
|
>I've never seen a truck pull either.... well, wait a minute. I did
>use my truck to pull some stumps once. Does that count?
That depends. Did anybody put 10 bucks down on the stump
to win????
(The above question is purely hyperthetical, and is not to
be interpreted as an endorsement of waggering on either
truck-pulling, stump-pulling, or any other kind of *-pulling)
JimH
|
61.797 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Sep 27 1994 14:41 | 14 |
|
MAB may be wet behind the ears. Hell he might even be wet between
his legs? ;-) But the 4 major sports in the USA are Basketball,
Baseball, football, and Hockey. Dream all you want about Soccer but it
is not that popular in the USA. So that being said when an AMERICAN
says the 4 major sports! Chances are he is talking about the
aforementioned 4 sports.
Now if you wanna move to France or TimBukToo or any other place
in this world other than the USA you can claim Soccer as being one of
the major sports.
Chappy
|
61.798 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Sep 27 1994 14:46 | 11 |
|
|Given says who? And can you speak for Everyman? Gawd I hope not....
He cain't even speak for himself. (ISFH)
I don't think any of the "other" sports, including soccer are trying
to be American "major" sports. They realize that Americans have more
disposable income than anywehre else, and if they can find a niche for
their sports, they will do all right.
=Bob=
|
61.799 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 27 1994 14:47 | 8 |
|
You are 100% correct, Chappy. And so is M_Air. We ain't
talking about the major sports in some gad forsaken place
where you can't even get a decent cheeseburger and fries.
We're talking about the US of A and it says right here
that soccer and especially NASL soccer ain't not a "major"
sport in this here country. Hell, I honestly thought that
the NASL was defunct.
|
61.800 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Sep 27 1994 14:47 | 16 |
| > -< What was the over/under? 15 roots??? >-
>
>
> That depends. Did anybody put 10 bucks down on the stump
> to win????
>
> (The above question is purely hyperthetical, and is not to
> be interpreted as an endorsement of waggering on either
> truck-pulling, stump-pulling, or any other kind of *-pulling)
>
No, but my dad bet me $5 the chain would break. Does that count?
|
61.801 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Sep 27 1994 14:59 | 29 |
|
I think I smell a rathole...
Just to investigate further...
IMHO, major team sports include (on a world wide basis):
Baseball
American Football
Soccer
Basketball
Hockey
Major individual sports include:
Auto Racing
Bowling
Golf
Tennis
> We're talking about the US of A
Well, see, that's the problem. You didn't say "major US sport",
so I assumed, for lack of a restricting adjective, you were
refering to major sports around the world.
It all depends upon your perspective...
Joe
|
61.802 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Sep 27 1994 15:13 | 26 |
| You guys are such a bunch of weenies.
You're all shuckin' and jivin' here, talkin' about major sports in America,
and what an American means when he says major sports. It's really all
quite laughable.
If you guy had any 'nads, you'd belly up to the bar and go absolute. But
when someone does that on you, you start tap-dancin' and qualifyin' your
statements.
It's quite funny.
Mab's over there squeezin' his brain real hard hopin' somethign resemblin'
logic will pop out.
Chappy's tellin' me I'm un-A-mer-uh-can because I've got a world view.
Tommy, my most worthy opponent, is talkin' about french fries...
I'm rolling!
'Saw
|
61.803 | From my perspective.....socker...smocker | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Sep 27 1994 15:17 | 62 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
*C*L*E*V*E*L*A*N*D*
*D*A*W*G*S*
An inside look at the Browns....by Hal (BIG DAWG) Whitehair:
After 4 weeks in this young NFL season, the Cleveland
Browns have recored 3 victorys and 1 giveaway. The Browns
defense is the name of the game in Cleveland. The Browns have
allowed the least amount of points in the NFL. Led by the best
line in the league, Michael Dean Perry, the All Pro defensive
linemen and Pepper Johnson, All Pro Linebacker, the DAWGS have
stopped all running backs that have tried to penitrate the line.
Foster-held to less than 80 yards.....Faulk-held to less than
60 yards.....and the list could continue. Credit these two men
for the stopage at the line. The Browns secondary has improved
greatly over the last two years with Turner and newly drafted
Antonio Langman (sp). These two have combined for 5 INTS so far
this year. The Browns have gone back to man on man coverage this
year and these guys are the reason why. The DAWGS have ruled
the league so far this year.
The offense has played spendedly the last two weeks and seem to
be jelling as a unit. Michael Jackson is still injured and hasn't
played the last two games but others have rissen to the occasion...
ie: Hoard, Vardell, Metcalf just to name a few. The offense is
now being ran by an official offensive coordinator and not the
head coach this year, and from what has been shown....for the good.
It appears that Vinnie, when on his mark, can pick apart a defense
like the best of them. The way of the offense is through their
backfield. More passes have been thrown to the back than the
wide receivers. I have no problem whti this.........it has
produced!
Special Teams: Best in the League....
The Jets are beat up and the Browns are ready to explode again.
With the game being at home, I hold little chance for the Jets
to rebound against the DAWGS in the pound.
on to 4-1 and an AMERICAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE CENTRAL DIVISION TITLE.
GO BROWNS!!
WOOF!
|
61.804 | Nice........... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Sep 27 1994 15:22 | 13 |
|
I never said you was unamerican? I think those novels you read have
your mind a little foggy and you think your Albert Sweitzer but.....
I too have been to France as well as England, Denmark,Norway,Germany
And About 90% of Central and South America. And I'm only 29 (wow). And
the way people in France think about Americans...... lets just say they
are not a good example.
Chap
|
61.805 | Hey HAL - JoJ you're not... | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Sep 27 1994 15:33 | 0 |
61.806 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 27 1994 15:47 | 15 |
|
re .802
You were sleeping in class again. To recap for you (and anyone
else who was not paying attention), remarks were made about how
the city of Cleveland had not had a champion in a major sport in
over 30 years. One of our Clevelanders piped up that so and so of
the NASL had won the league title last year thus refuting my claim.
The argument then ensued whether soccer and/or the NASL constituted
a major sport. Valid arguments were made on both sides. Then you
piped in about your broadening experiences in France and of how
narrow minded we ugly Americans were and had a good little snicker
to yourself and thus dragged another thought provoking and informative
discussion into another discourse about yourself and your past ex-
periences which had little or nothing to do with the topic at hand.
|
61.807 | Pats could have played Langham and not signed that stiff Reynolds | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:14 | 7 |
| To tell you the truth, I would have preferred that the Patriots drafted
Langham rather than Willie (my hamstring's hurt again) McGinest.
Despite the success of the team, Parcell's 1994 draft will live in
infamy as the worst in Patriots history.
NAZZ
|
61.808 | :-) :-) :-) :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:22 | 22 |
| Maybe my logic is messed up saw, so I guess when an american talks to
you about the 4 major sports soccer comes in your mind, ok thats fine
but when an american makes a statement about the (4) major sports I
being the Un=Intelegent person you claim me to be thinks for the 4
major sports, the only major sports. Now if someone from the other
side of the lake makes the statement I may have to think about what
they were talking about..
hey joe I dont have to remind you what assume means ....
If someone had the money to start up a decent american football league
in Europe it would take over, american football is more manly (rougher)
then soccer football and seeing how violent soccer fans are they would
love american football (How do ticket sales do when the NFL has games
over there ??).
Ok all you Noters out there, you must now (for cam and joe's benefit)
explain to everyone what the major sports here in america are, you
can no longer assume that all noters in here have the knowledge of
what the major sports are... Dont ASSUME cam knows anything...
mab
|
61.809 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:26 | 2 |
|
Cam Neely notes in here?
|
61.810 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:46 | 24 |
|
Cam Neely a Browns fan? Neat... B^)
> Ok all you Noters out there, you must now (for cam and joe's benefit)
> explain to everyone what the major sports here in america are, you
> can no longer assume that all noters in here have the knowledge of
> what the major sports are...
You don't have to explain to me what the major US sports are; with
the exception of hockey, which is borderline, I think everyone in
here would pretty well agree.
You just have to say "US" (or United States, or USA, or America, or
whatever else will clarify the situation) if you mean major US
sports, and not major sports.
But, just to make everyone comfortable with their own perspective,
I'll assume you, and Chappy, and Mr. Byrdie all implying US when I
see the words "major sport".
Everyone happy now? B^)
Joe
|
61.811 | Of Eagle Hockey fame(since hockey nicknames are in) | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Sep 27 1994 17:22 | 6 |
| I kinda like that "Cam" Way monniker. But I like "Snooks" even better.
(Sometime I'm gonna have to meet ol' Cam/Snooks/Frank Way (almost did
last year when my car overheated in Conn. - he almost had houseguests)
billte
|
61.812 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Tue Sep 27 1994 18:03 | 4 |
|
I thought 'Saw's nickname was Pookie?
Claybone
|
61.813 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Sep 28 1994 00:28 | 5 |
61.814 | yes | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Sep 28 1994 08:24 | 19 |
|
CLEVELAND CLEVELAND CLEVELAND CLEVELAND
Yes, the Browns appear to have an easy game this weekend against
the Jets. With the Jets starting quarterback out the DAWGS front
line will be putting lots of pressure on the QB and will more
than likely grab a couple out of the air.
Quarterback Vinnie was reported as saying..."To hell with all you
nonbelievers, we are your next Supper Bowl Champions!" as he held
his index finger in the air.
Eric Metcalf added..."I wana play that bowling pin team agan."
refering to the Pittsquerb Squeelers....
Go DAWGS!
WOOF!
|
61.815 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Wed Sep 28 1994 09:45 | 36 |
| > You were sleeping in class again. To recap for you (and anyone
> else who was not paying attention), remarks were made about how
> the city of Cleveland had not had a champion in a major sport in
> over 30 years. One of our Clevelanders piped up that so and so of
> the NASL had won the league title last year thus refuting my claim.
> The argument then ensued whether soccer and/or the NASL constituted
> a major sport. Valid arguments were made on both sides. Then you
> piped in about your broadening experiences in France and of how
> narrow minded we ugly Americans were and had a good little snicker
> to yourself and thus dragged another thought provoking and informative
> discussion into another discourse about yourself and your past ex-
> periences which had little or nothing to do with the topic at hand.
And you're engaging in revisionist history.
I was responding to all the bullshit about American Major sports. No
one limited the discussion early on to American when referring to "major
sports".
I used France as an example of a broadened view, and of course, in regard
to the people I was referring to, they are narrow minded.
As to the discussion being thought provoking, why don't I bring in a plate
of shit and set it in front of us....that would be about as thought provoking
as the discussion was.
You'll have to try harder next time.....
|
61.816 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Sick as a Dog!!! | Wed Sep 28 1994 09:47 | 9 |
| RE "Major Sports"
In Clevescum, pud pulling is considered a mojor sport, played
intramurally between the companies there.
Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
JaKe
|
61.817 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Wed Sep 28 1994 10:10 | 55 |
| >
> Maybe my logic is messed up saw, so I guess when an american talks to
> you about the 4 major sports soccer comes in your mind, ok thats fine
> but when an american makes a statement about the (4) major sports I
> being the Un=Intelegent person you claim me to be thinks for the 4
> major sports, the only major sports. Now if someone from the other
> side of the lake makes the statement I may have to think about what
> they were talking about..
I never said soccer came to mind. I just said that soccer is a major
sport outside of the US.
I learned a long time ago to never fill in the blanks based on someone's
nationality. I'd give you some examples of why, but I don't want to
turn Tommy's stomach with my personal experiences.
>
> If someone had the money to start up a decent american football league
> in Europe it would take over, american football is more manly (rougher)
> then soccer football and seeing how violent soccer fans are they would
> love american football (How do ticket sales do when the NFL has games
> over there ??).
>
They tried it, remember -- WLAF, and the attendance wasn't that great.
And I wish I had saved them, but our little town newspaper had a series
of articles about 8 years ago, by a guy from town (former football player
and coach) who was living in England and coaching a team in their local
American football league. The english didn't enjoy playing it that
much -- believe it or not, most of the them preferred rugby, and their
attitude towards the game was take it or leave it.
The Germans I've talked to abhor baseball (no surprise their) and their
main complaint with American football is there's too many breaks in the
action.
But I gather you've conducted a study of what Europeans like, so I
probably stand corrected. And without Tommy's permission to talk about
personal experiences, I guess I don't have the proverbial leg to stand on.
> Ok all you Noters out there, you must now (for cam and joe's benefit)
> explain to everyone what the major sports here in america are, you
> can no longer assume that all noters in here have the knowledge of
> what the major sports are... Dont ASSUME cam knows anything...
If you can explain something so that most of us in here can understand
it without resorting to decoder rings -- go for it....
|
61.818 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Wed Sep 28 1994 10:12 | 10 |
| >
> (Sometime I'm gonna have to meet ol' Cam/Snooks/Frank Way (almost did
> last year when my car overheated in Conn. - he almost had houseguests)
>
> billte
You should have stopped by -- I always have beer in the fridge, and there's
lots of stories we could have swapped.....
|
61.819 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Wed Sep 28 1994 10:13 | 15 |
| >
> I thought 'Saw's nickname was Pookie?
>
> Claybone
Huh?
The only other nickname I have besides 'Saw, which is mostly only used by
you folks, is "NF".
'Saw
|
61.820 | Soccer is pool on a field | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Sep 28 1994 10:24 | 8 |
| Well Rugby is to football what football is to soccer... NOW THATS A
MANLY SPORT...
I dont know how those guys survive,
(In my best Bevis&Butthead Voice)
RUGBY haha Thats Cool
mab
|
61.821 | The Central is there for the Taken, will cleveland do it | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Sep 28 1994 10:34 | 31 |
| Now about the Browns, even the most decorated Anti Browns fans have to
admit the Browns should make the playoffs this year. Hosting NY Jets
without there starting QB should be a win (Id prefer the jets win :-).)
Then clevland has a bye week after which they play Houston, Cinncy,
Denver and then THE MIGHTY PATS. If they beat NY (Very Possible/and
probable) they will be 4-1. Those next 4 games are all WINNABLE (
except of course the pats game). But come on now, seeing the browns
at 7-2 is not a stretch of the imagination at this point. but then
there schedule get DIFFICULT (Philly, KC, Hou, NYG, DAL, Pitt and Sea)
Can they win 3+ of those games is the question, 9 wins will not
guarentee them a playoff spot. The Houston games will be huge,
Cleveland Defense is very good (Even if there offense is medioca at
best). But Cody Carlson may have problems VS Cleveland's Defense, a
sweep of Houston could land them the division, granted its the weakist
division in football, but who's watching :-).
I think my sorrow for the Cleveland Fans who have watched there teams
come so close and lose (Like the Cavs who get major injuries every
year) has flowed over to football. Houston dont deserve the division
after letting moon go, cinncy is a joke (Although getting better). And
at this point Id rather see Cleveland then PITTSBURG !!! (Thats a hard
statement to make).
Good Luck Hal, any cleveland team needs luck... They should have kept
bernie, with there defense, Bernie, a healthy Michael Jackson, and
ERIC METCALF they would be a lock for the central (The Moonless Cent)
But Vinny may be what stop's Cleveland from going anywhere this year.
(Cleveland should have made a run at MOON).
mab
|
61.822 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Wed Sep 28 1994 10:40 | 17 |
| > Well Rugby is to football what football is to soccer... NOW THATS A
> MANLY SPORT...
>
> I dont know how those guys survive,
> (In my best Bevis&Butthead Voice)
> RUGBY haha Thats Cool
It does have its moments, but also remember that while you do try to
hit as hard as you can, you don't get that air of invincibility that
you have with pads on.
Your first shoulder separation from shoulder tackling someone reminds you
of that.... Rugby has more shoulder injuries than knee injuries which
is unlike football.
'Saw
|
61.823 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | In Bigshorts We Trust | Wed Sep 28 1994 11:03 | 6 |
| In Rugby League the players wear shoulder pads, although not on the same scale
as your football players. It's only in Union where the tradition is not to
protect yourself. Rugby League is consequently a vastly superior spectator sport
if you likebig hits and crunching tackles. 8-)
Mike
|
61.824 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Wed Sep 28 1994 11:11 | 17 |
| >
>In Rugby League the players wear shoulder pads, although not on the same scale
>as your football players. It's only in Union where the tradition is not to
>protect yourself. Rugby League is consequently a vastly superior spectator sport
>if you likebig hits and crunching tackles. 8-)
>
Rugby League is for wusses who whore themselves out for money 8^) 8^)
Actually, the way it is described to me, League is closer to American
football than it is to rugby. I guess you could say it is midway
between in terms of evolution....
'Saw
|
61.825 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Sep 28 1994 12:18 | 5 |
61.826 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Sep 28 1994 12:48 | 16 |
|
>> I was responding to all the <beep> about American Major sports. No
>> one limited the discussion early on to American when referring to "major
>> sports".
Apparently, some things aren't as intuitively obvious to some as they
are to others. I certainly wouldn't have thought that we were referring
to something so generic as 'major' sports on a worldwide scale or else
the list would be endless. And there's really no need for the ugly
scatalogical references. Not only are they crude and tasteless but
they diminish the entire conference.
|
61.827 | major sport | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Sep 28 1994 13:33 | 6 |
| BTW
When talking major sport; You should also mention Golf. It was
reported that Golf is the most popular participatory sport by
americans. And everyone knows that the best in Golf is from
outside of the US of A.
|
61.828 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Wed Sep 28 1994 13:46 | 20 |
| > the list would be endless. And there's really no need for the ugly
> scatalogical references. Not only are they crude and tasteless but
> they diminish the entire conference.
A picture is worth a thousand words and one man's sh*t is another man's
treasure....
I was responding to the implication that soccer was not a major sport,
not that it wasn't a major sport in America, or Sri Lanka, or
Newcastle-Upon-Tyne... That's what the note I responded to said.
Sorry if I'm not the Amazing Kreskin.....
|
61.829 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | In Bigshorts We Trust | Thu Sep 29 1994 08:12 | 13 |
| 'Saw,
The only real difference between rugby league and rugby union is that league has
less players, and instead of having to release the ball as in union, you are
allowed six "tackles" to progress the ball up the field. When you get tackled
for the sixth time you have to hand over possession, so it is normal to kick the
ball upfield after the 5th tackle. League is much faster and more free flowing.
It's nothin like American football really.
The only other difference, and it is a monumental one, is that league is played
in the north of england, and union in the south.
Mike
|
61.830 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Thu Sep 29 1994 10:03 | 9 |
| >The only other difference, and it is a monumental one, is that league is played
>in the north of england, and union in the south.
I hear you on that.
Also, don't League players get a salary?
'Saw
|
61.831 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Jubilee | Thu Sep 29 1994 10:45 | 5 |
| Yes, but I don't think they're all that well paid. Many of the less well-known
players are part-time, and it's only big stars like Offiah, Hanley, and now
Scott Quinnell that I'd guess were rich.
Mike
|
61.832 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Thu Sep 29 1994 11:19 | 17 |
| >
>Yes, but I don't think they're all that well paid. Many of the less well-known
>players are part-time, and it's only big stars like Offiah, Hanley, and now
>Scott Quinnell that I'd guess were rich.
Oh.....
And moving back in a Cleveland vein there was a great line on Imus this morning
about Michael Fay, the infamous "canee" from Ohio. They said that he
had a butane sniffing problem. Bernard piped up and said, hey, if you were
from Ohio you'd have a butane sniffing problem too....
Had me peein' my paints!
'Saw
|
61.833 | I GUESS YOU HAD TO BE THERE | CNTROL::CHILDS | She was a TWO-Bagger | Thu Sep 29 1994 12:03 | 2 |
|
|
61.834 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | QUIET--case study in progress | Thu Sep 29 1994 13:04 | 9 |
| > <<< Note 61.831 by FORTY2::FOWLERM "Jubilee" >>>
>
> Yes, but I don't
> think they're all that well paid. Many of the less well-knownplayers
> are part-time, and it's only big stars like Offiah, Hanley, and
> nowScott Quinnell that I'd guess were rich.Mike
Stop hiding out here in Cleveland and get over to the boxing note so
that you can take your punishment like a man.
|
61.835 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Sep 29 1994 13:23 | 32 |
|
>> Stop hiding out here in Cleveland and get over to the boxing note so
>> that you can take your punishment like a man.
Yes, remember this gem from the keyboard of one Mike Fowler (see
below)? Pay particular attention to the title of the note. And now
consider that in the last month alone, Nigel Benn needed a very dodgy
decision to beat a journeyman/nobody/complete stiff and then
Lennox Lewis gets his clock cleaned by a man whose prior (and only)
claim to fame was that he was a sparring partner for Mike Tyson. I
hesitate to say that this marks the sad decline of British boxing
because none of those fighters merited all of that chest puffing to
begin with. Still, Mike don't you wish that you had fighters like
Roy Jones, James Toney, Pernell Whittaker, Buddy McGirt, etc., etc.,
etc.
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 67.162 Official Boxing Topic 162 of 602
FORTY2::FOWLERM "Workers of the world unite" 8 lines 2-NOV-1993 04:45
-< The sad decline of American boxing >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does this mean that of the three world heavyweight titles, two are now held by
"englishmen"? Excellent. Any time you chaps over the pond want some tips, don't
hesitate to ask. 8-)
You used to be the best but now you can only dream of having boxers like Chris
Eubank, Lennox Lewis, etc. Still at least you've got Riddick "Fat Boy" Bowe. 8-)
Mike
|
61.836 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Sep 29 1994 14:47 | 6 |
| re: Imus
Reverend Billy Sol Harkness is BACK!
The Crazy Met
|
61.837 | | FORTY2::FOWLERM | Jubilee | Fri Sep 30 1994 06:30 | 12 |
| re:-2
Curses, found out at last. We've still got Chris Eubank though. Hmmmm, on second
thoughts, forget I said that. I think Henry Wharton will smack Eubank in
December.
Lewis wasn't English anyway. You wait 'till Bruno fights McCall.
Surely this marks the decline of boxing as a whole, not just English boxing.
Toney is great but there's not much else around.
Mike
|
61.838 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Sep 30 1994 08:23 | 7 |
|
Oh so now Lewis isn't English. You Brit's slay me....
Chap
|
61.839 | O'Donnell and Klingler SUCK! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Sep 30 1994 09:29 | 8 |
61.840 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Sep 30 1994 09:44 | 7 |
|
Extract that one Boys it will be fun to repost it. :-)
Chap
|
61.841 | Backing up a couple of ratholes... | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Sep 30 1994 09:45 | 21 |
| This is a bit old hat by now, but I haven't been in the office
since Monday.
re .799
> You are 100% correct, Chappy. And so is M_Air. We ain't
> talking about the major sports in some gad forsaken place
> where you can't even get a decent cheeseburger and fries.
Tommy, I don't know of such a place. American football may not
have conquered the world (actually, they got pretty good crowds
for the Waffle in London, Barcelona, and Frankfurt), but the
hamburger most definitely has. Fear not: wherever you may
travel, you are never far from the next Burger King or Macdonald's.
And most steak houses (no longer a largely British/American
phenomenon here in Europe) will serve you a burger that is
considerably better than fast-food quality.
Do not despair.
Steve
|
61.842 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Fri Sep 30 1994 10:04 | 7 |
| And besides, while I didn't like a lot of France, their fries are EXCELLENT.
Steven, do you know a guy named Jim Egerton?
'Saw
|
61.843 | And there Shakes were Like water... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Sep 30 1994 10:29 | 8 |
|
funny, I went to A Macdonalds in Paris, and had the worst BigMac I
ever tasted. Brown lettuce, Sticky Special sauce and everything!!!
Chap
|
61.844 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Fri Sep 30 1994 10:32 | 18 |
| > -< And there Shakes were Like water... >-
>
> funny, I went to A Macdonalds in Paris, and had the worst BigMac I
> ever tasted. Brown lettuce, Sticky Special sauce and everything!!!
The one in Evry wasn't bad, but you're closer to the mark. They're
not that great in the burger department.
I didn't like steak in France either -- I like mine medium, and all of their
stuff comes out exceedingly rare (like waved over the flame three times)....
But there was other food that was delish, especially out in Normandy....
'Saw
|
61.845 | Food in France is worth its own Notesfile | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Sep 30 1994 11:24 | 24 |
|
> Steven, do you know a guy named Jim Egerton?
> 'Saw
No. Should I?
Re: last 2 or so. No offense intended, but if you're in France and
the best place you can find to eat is Macdonald's, then you just
aren't paying attention.
Anyway, I'm a Burger King man myself.
'Saw, I like a good rare steak, and some of the best I've had have been
in France. But it is now much easier to get a good steak in Germany, as
a number of chains have spread across the country that use Argentine
beef (German cows do pushups).
Right now, I'm looking forward to getting to California, where I can
get a good fresh green salad and visit a good Jewish delicatessen.
I'll drop in here about 1800 (1 PM EDT) for a last look around.
Steve
|
61.846 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Fri Sep 30 1994 11:46 | 6 |
| > I'll drop in here about 1800 (1 PM EDT) for a last look around.
Are you back on Standard time??
The Crazy Met
|
61.847 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Fri Sep 30 1994 11:48 | 41 |
| |> Steven, do you know a guy named Jim Egerton?
|> 'Saw
|
|
|No. Should I?
He's a guy I used to work with (brilliant guy) here who's been on
an international relo over in Munich for about he past 4/5 years.
He does a lot with manufacturing software....
>
>'Saw, I like a good rare steak, and some of the best I've had have been
>in France. But it is now much easier to get a good steak in Germany, as
>a number of chains have spread across the country that use Argentine
>beef (German cows do pushups).
>
Ja, das DeutscheCow is moosle-bounden 8^)
Yeah, France can be cool if you like it really rare. I like mine a little
more towards medium.
One thing I liked about Germany was the preponderance of other kinds of
meat to eat. I mean, here in America, beef is basically your primary
meat, but in Germany (well, Munich is all I know) other meat seemed more
prevalent. I've always liked German food.
>Right now, I'm looking forward to getting to California, where I can
>get a good fresh green salad and visit a good Jewish delicatessen.
We have some great Jewish delis here in CT too.
>I'll drop in here about 1800 (1 PM EDT) for a last look around.
Have a great vacation, and we expect a trip report when you get back....
have fun,
'Saw
|
61.848 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Sep 30 1994 12:52 | 13 |
|
You haven't tasted meat til ya eat Monkey in Panama!!!! MMMMM
Oh BTW we are in the Cleveland Note so I'll mention them too.
I've never been to Cleveland but I here it's nice.
NOT!!!!!!!!!!!
Chap
|
61.849 | I think they'll make the offs (should win div) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Sep 30 1994 13:26 | 9 |
| Well I for one will not rag on the Brown spots this year, there season
was helped more by Houston then anyone else, releasing moon sealed
there fate and opened the doors for Cleveland. Metcalf is the only
player on the team I enjoy watching but thats ok, RB's are awsome..
Of course the odds of the dogs beating anyone in the playffs is slim
and none :-)
mab
|
61.850 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Sep 30 1994 13:27 | 4 |
| Don't bother to save Groaner's note to repost it. He'll be gone in a
few weeks and won't be back until training camp next year.
Mike
|
61.851 | Not goodbye, just auf Wiedersehen | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Sep 30 1994 14:26 | 23 |
| TCM: yes, we go onto standard time the weekend after the fall equinox
and onto daylight time the weekend after the spring equinox. This makes
a perfect time window to travel to the States, I only jump 8 time zones
instead of 9 and I get an additional 25-hour day when the States convert.
'Saw: depending on how long ago you were here, you might not recognize
German cooking. Actually, the old traditions are still alive (here in
Bavaria, they eat parts of pigs I didn't even know existed), but they've
been expanded considerably by exposure to the rest of Europe and the
world.
Chap: I was in Cleveland once in my life, back in 1965. I was not
exactly enthralled, but I understand the city has undergone quite
a renewal over the last 10 years or so. And they've got a new ball
park.
All: yeah, you'll get a trip report. Day 1: lay on backside. Day 2:
spend $400 at Super-Crown. Day 3: lay on backside. Day 4: watched
fights on ESPN. Day 5: lay on backside. Day 6...
Hope like hell you're all still there when I get back.
Steve
|
61.852 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Sep 30 1994 15:18 | 5 |
61.853 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Fri Sep 30 1994 16:48 | 9 |
| .839 is one of the funniest things I've read. Has anybody ever seen
Groaner and HAL in the same place at the same time????
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Clevescum S U C K S !!!!!
JaKe
|
61.854 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Fri Sep 30 1994 16:58 | 11 |
| Lessee Groaner, seeing as Testicleverde is only good fer about 4 decent
games a year, and he's wasted 2 or 3 of those in the early going, looks
like he'll be back to playing "Mr. Interception" again in a week or
two, and then the rest of the Brown(spot)s(tm) will succumb to the
sludge of Clevescum, and the 'SPots will finish about 8-8.
Gots a p-name that says the STEELERS finish higher ranked than the
Spots, Groaner.
JaKe
|
61.855 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Sep 30 1994 17:09 | 4 |
61.856 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Fri Sep 30 1994 17:15 | 5 |
| You'll have to wear the p_name fer a week, and enter at least one note
per day, okay??
JaKe
|
61.857 | B^) | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Fri Sep 30 1994 18:04 | 10 |
|
Just saw your pool entry, JaKe - picking the Browns and giving
points? My, my, my... guess you must have more confidence in
Testaverde than you let on...
Who knows... maybe JaKe's Clevelandphilic, but in denial... the
deepest skeleton in his closet a Browns jacket with the number
#19 on the back...
Joe
|
61.859 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Fri Sep 30 1994 18:23 | 10 |
|
Nah, just that the Jests are without Boomer and, face it, the Jests do
SUCK, and Clevescum is on a <minor> roll, so had to go with my HAID
instead of my heart. I'd love to see the skidmarks lose, but they'll
probably win. Plus, it's being played in Clevescum, and a lot of teams
have so much trouble playing there in the sludge pit, what with the
stench of the stadium, and the dawg(pig) pound.
JaKe
|
61.860 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Sat Oct 01 1994 04:43 | 3 |
| re: p-name bet
That's one way to get Groaner to participate in here after October.
|
61.861 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sat Oct 01 1994 16:41 | 7 |
61.862 | 4-1 and rising... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Oct 02 1994 21:08 | 2 |
61.863 | one of only 3 teams with 4 wins.... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:29 | 7 |
| I bet all eye's will be on MNF tonight, if Houston can come out on top
the Browns will have a 2 game lead going into the bye week... There
schedule come back to reality after the bye week, have to wait and see.
the Moonless Oilers S#$%* Big time...
mab
|
61.864 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:41 | 11 |
| The Brown(spot)s(tm) have played 5 games, are 4 and 1, and have only
faced one decent team, to whom they lost. They'll come back down to
earth fast.
Twas sickening watching Eric Metcalf swapping slobber with the idjuts
in the Pig Pound after scoring yesterday. Weird, but seems he "scored"
twice on that play, once with the TD, and once with them weirdos beyond
the end zone.
JaKe
|
61.865 | metCalf RULES in CLEVELAND | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:46 | 5 |
| Now come on even anit browns fan have to recognize decent talant.
I think Metcalf is one of the only highlights on the team, Id love
to see him... Say in NEW ENGLAND :-)
mab
|
61.866 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:49 | 8 |
| re.865
I din't say he had no talent, I just said it was sickening watching him
swap slobber wif the Pig Pound. Nexted thing ya knwo, he'll be on the
field with a leftover Bernice dress.
JaKe
|
61.867 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Mon Oct 03 1994 17:17 | 42 |
|
For those who think some in here are overly optimistic about
the Browns' prospects, I'll present the following excerpt from
the Cleveland Sports Mailing List...
> Well, the Browns future looks real good; here's the breakdown:
>
> **Record **Opponent **Summary
> 4-1 at Houston 1-3 EZ win. Nuff said.
> 5-1 Bungles 0-5 Trounce.
> 6-1 at Denver 0-4 Sorry Elway, you have no
> support.
> 7-1 at Patriots 3-2 Tuff game, Big-D comes through.
>
> after game in New England the Browns are 8-1.
>
> 8-1 at Phili 3-1 Lose a close one.
> 8-2 at KC Marty ball fails at home.
> 9-2 Houston Crushing win.
> 10-2 Giants Bellichick beats old team.
> 11-2 at Dallas Not likely. Where's Kosar?
> 11-3 at Steelers You suck! Browns make up
> earlier loss.
> 12-3 Seattle Home victory.
>
> Browns finish regular season 13-3.
>
> Win Central Division. Meet, and beat, Miami for AFC Championship.
> Meet and lose to Dallas in the Super Bowl.
Despite the prediction of some (JaKe), I'm now convinced that the
Browns _can_ make the playoffs. The defense has come together
well, and the offense has enough weapons to pull a few wins out.
I will give Belichek this much - since he's arrived, the Browns
have drafted well. I still can't stand him, and do _not_ want
him to continue as head coach, because even if things break just
right this year (see above) I'm not at all convinced that it will
help next year. But we're likely stuck with him for another year
at least. B^(
Joe
|
61.868 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Mon Oct 03 1994 17:22 | 4 |
| Sounds like that "newsletter" is written by HAL.
JaKe
|
61.869 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Oct 03 1994 17:37 | 6 |
| | Sounds like that "newsletter" is written by HAL.
Beat me to it, JaKe.
Actually, it will be interesting to see what happens with Pitt/Houston
tonight. Could be that the Browns may be the best in the AFC Central.
|
61.870 | 13-3 ??? Puh-leeeeeze. | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Mon Oct 03 1994 17:46 | 4 |
|
Sounds like acid sales are soaring in Cleveland...
|
61.871 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 03 1994 18:33 | 4 |
61.872 | too funny | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 03 1994 19:15 | 4 |
| Groaner predicted 15-1 last year. He disappeared before Veteran's Day.
I don't even think Clevescum made the playoffs.
Mike
|
61.873 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 03 1994 19:17 | 7 |
| Wanna see something funny? try this command:
DIR/AUTHOR=gronowski 61.*
There's a *HUGE* gap from October '93 to September '94!
Mike ;-)
|
61.874 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Tue Oct 04 1994 10:40 | 17 |
|
>> too bad jake declined the bet I offered
>> where the person who's team was lower in the standings each week had
>> to change their pname. Jake declined saying he didn't want to tie up
>> his pname for that long. What confidence.
Groaner, it's a fixed offer right now. The 'Spots have a cake schedule
over the nexted few weeks after the bye, and the STEELERS don't play
them for a while.
If the offer for this wager was made when the clubs were tied in the
standings, I'd take it, but the 'Spots are 1 up right now, so it ain't
an even bet.
JaKe
|
61.875 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Tue Oct 04 1994 11:55 | 16 |
|
So after 9/10 week's of the season the 'Spot fans will still be
saying, "Who have we played?" The 'Spots won't get rid of the critics
until they make the playoffs and win a playoff game. The Browns
schedule is luck of the draw. With Denver/Houston and others having
down years so far.
The Patriots will end up with a pretty tough schedule, in terms of
the other teams W/L record. Miami/Buffalo (Twice), Detroit, Green Bay,
Chicago, Minnesota, San Diego, and Seattle. The Raiders can always be
touch also. The current Patriot team could end up playing ~8 games
during the season against playoff teams, with another 2/3 on teams that
just miss the playoffs.
I'll give the Browns credit in saying they are winning the games
they are suppose to win.
Ron
|
61.876 | 'Spots sip pond water/ Jake you have to mail me some put downs | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Tue Oct 04 1994 12:53 | 11 |
|
Joe.....
I for one am a Pats fan and if you think the Pats will loose to the
'Spots in Foxboro I'm willing to take you up on that. (Any of you
Clevscum fans for that matter.) I will make the bet now, no points
either way with the looser having to sport the p'name of the winner
for a week. Any takers.
Jerry
|
61.877 | | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Tue Oct 04 1994 13:37 | 6 |
| re: .-1
Think the Spots and Pats are duking it out in the
Pound, not at Foxboro.
zamboni
|
61.878 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Oct 04 1994 13:47 | 18 |
|
> Joe.....
> I for one am a Pats fan and if you think the Pats will loose to the
> Browns in Foxboro I'm willing to take you up on that.
I don't, and never said that I did. It could happen, and I'm not
convinced it won't, but it's not something I'm going to bet the
farm on.
> (Any of you Cleveland fans for that matter.) I will make the bet
> now, no points either way with the looser having to sport the
> p'name of the winner for a week. Any takers.
Not here, no. If it were in Cleveland, sure. But the risk/reward
ratio for a straight up bet is too great...
Joe
|
61.879 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:14 | 5 |
| wimp 1 checked in. I have little doubt that Hal and Groaner will be
wimps 2 and 3.
The Crazy Met
|
61.880 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:27 | 5 |
61.881 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:35 | 6 |
| yup and saw someone who does not wimp out on reasonable bets. When
do the two teams play, can't imagine there will be a large spread, if
any at all.
The Crazy Met
|
61.882 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:37 | 3 |
61.883 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:41 | 5 |
| As long as you put the tag line in here of "for amusement purposes only"
it's cool in SPROTS(tm).....
'Saw
|
61.884 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:42 | 3 |
61.885 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:47 | 19 |
| >
> Gee, I must have missed that when scanning over the P&P manual.
>
Whoopee.
You've never bitched about it before, and it's gone on in here for a long
time.... P-name bets are a part of sports.
As far as I'm concerned if you're not wagering money, then it's not
gambling.
Take the bet or not, it makes no difference to me......
'Saw
|
61.886 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:49 | 7 |
|
Re .881
Why should I bet on something I don't think is going to happen?
If I thought the Browns were going to win, I'd do it...
Joe
|
61.887 | I can't lose | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:51 | 6 |
|
I'll take that bet.......The DAWGS will eat the Patsies up and
spit them out then walk all over them. No points. Such a deal.
WOOF!
|
61.888 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:56 | 22 |
61.889 | This will be good | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:15 | 8 |
|
Hal...
Well that is one taker. Only stipulation is that you show up in here
at least once a day Hal...Ya man enough?
Jerry
|
61.890 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:24 | 9 |
| Uhh, Jerry, did you read the second stipulation of the bet?
While I agree that a New England victory over the Browns is
probably about even money right now, if you are sure that the
Pats will end up with a better record than Cleveland you are
likely looking at things through red-blue-and-silver shaded
glasses.
=Bob=
|
61.891 | What the hell, count me in too... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:36 | 20 |
|
> While I agree that a New England victory over the Browns is
> probably about even money right now, if you are sure that the
> Pats will end up with a better record than Cleveland you are
> likely looking at things through red-blue-and-silver shaded
> glasses.
I don't know about that (I'm assuming a tie is a push). The Pats
have come through the relatively tough 5-game stretch in decent shape,
and have 4 games remaining with the mighty Jesters and Dolts. They're
in a better position than I thought they'd be, even before the season
started and certainly after the first two games.
On the other hand, maybe I'm underrating the Browns, as I haven't seen
them at all this year, but I still think numbers like a >75% chance to
make the playoffs are premature (then again, it doesn't take much to
gain the last wildcard, I guess).
glenn
|
61.892 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:46 | 7 |
| With 14 teams in a conference and 6 making the playoffs, a team has to be
pretty creative to have a winning record and not get at least a wild card.
I guess it can be done but it seems so tricky that there should be some
sort of prize for pulling it off.
George
|
61.893 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:50 | 6 |
| re: .890
The 2 parter was by Groaner, HAL took the original, manly p_name bet.
The Crazy Met
|
61.894 | The more I look at that schedule the more I like it... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:53 | 12 |
|
> With 14 teams in a conference and 6 making the playoffs, a team has to be
> pretty creative to have a winning record and not get at least a wild card.
Yeah, but I see the Browns being really up against it in the Philly,
KC, NYG, Dallas, and Pittsburgh (in Pittsburgh) games, give or take
a game (let's say they'll win one of those), so I think they'll have
to win 4 of 6 from Houston (2), Cinci, Denver, New England, and Seattle
just to get to 9-7. That's not close to a lock.
glenn
|
61.895 | the shock, the horror | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:56 | 4 |
| Glenn are you implying that you disagree with .867??
The Crazy Met
|
61.896 | go broncos | BSS::MARLAND | | Tue Oct 04 1994 18:05 | 1 |
| Hey, Cleveland fans, you will NOT beat the Broncos this year.
|
61.897 | No mention of better record at all | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Wed Oct 05 1994 09:39 | 12 |
|
re Note 61.890 by SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH "Hakuna Matata - means no worries..." >>>
I never said anything about the Pats ending up w/ a better record than
the 'Spots. We don't have the luxary of playing Cinci and Houston
twice each. All I ever said was I was willing to make a pname bet now
staight up that the Pats would win.
Jerry
|
61.898 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:06 | 4 |
61.899 | It's almost one and the same... I'm in... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:38 | 12 |
|
> Two way street, you make one bet offer I make the other... take both
> or neither... its up to you.
I'm in... all things being equal I'd actually be more concerned with
the head-to-head game, because it's in Cleveland, but because the game
represents a 2-game swing in the overall record it'll probably
determine the second part too. But what the hell, it's a fair
proposition, for anyone with the cajones...
glenn
|
61.900 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:52 | 6 |
| yabbut Glenn I would make sure that part of the understanding is that Groaner
has to note at least once a day during that week. He has the same kind of track
record as Hal does for disappearing when things get rough.
The Crazy Met
|
61.901 | There in the Drives seat and should be able to handle it | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:58 | 19 |
| There biggest problem may be getting by houston in week 6, this team
is banged up and who know what Houston team will show up after the bye
week, its a Thursday night game at Houston. Will be intresting,
Houston's backs are up against the wall (1-4) and a loss to cleveland
at home will pretty much knock them out of it..
The WR's in Houston just didnt look good money night, not that the QB's
had any time to pass (Of could hit the side of a barn) but they looked
off, also what happened to Houston's defense, they were terrible as
well.
Cleveland should go 3-1 the next 4 games (Hoping the Pats pull off the
win) THERE REAL season will start at this point, if there at 7-2 they
have a shot at the division/playoffs if there at 6-3 they could be in
some trouble. There last 7 games WILL ALL HAVE PLAYOFF IMPLICATIONS.
Good Luck Brownies, I really didnt expect Houston to drop to 1-4..
mab
|
61.902 | | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Wed Oct 05 1994 16:33 | 7 |
|
Searched all MB's notes for 'their'... came up empty.
;) Greg
|
61.903 | No time to bandwagon jumpers | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Oct 05 1994 16:48 | 10 |
| -1, who are you.. Talk about a bandwagon jumper, there enough sports
noters on the RAG MAB"s notesfile that I dont need a bandwagon jumper.
There/Their has been documented, your too late, its a fact, its known
you missed the bus, sorry.
Cam(Way) and JD are the 2 best at raggin me and the rest are just
bandwagon wannabee's so stand in line behind them :-)
mab
|
61.904 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I feeel so good... | Wed Oct 05 1994 16:52 | 2 |
| Can I ask about your FFL_A team? (smiley goes here)
|
61.905 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Oct 05 1994 16:56 | 6 |
|
M_AIr may be the worst offender of the their/there/they're
rule but he does know his sports and he's obviously a big
sports fan. I'd hope that counts for as much as grammar. I'd
rather read some of his hacking than some of the gushing
purple prose that used to stain this conference.
|
61.906 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:12 | 5 |
| | Cam(Way) and JD are the 2 best at raggin me and the rest are just
| bandwagon wannabee's so stand in line behind them :-)
Hey I resent that. I've been raggin' on your grammer as long as those
guys.
|
61.907 | Its funny I can name every starting TE since Joining FFL leagues | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:16 | 13 |
| -1, thank you, -2, Ya Walt Kick a man when he's down, MY FFL_A teams
(The BullDozers) is in 8th spot, yup thats last and theyve only scored
120pts (DISGUSTING), funny thing is Im in 2 leagues, I though this team
would kick but and my other team would be ok, Im in last in this league
in scoring and in the standings, In my other league im second in
scoring with 256pts and 2nd in the standings...
Who would have Thunk that me wasting early picks on Ricky Watters,
Reggie Brooks and Ron Moore would have all been flops... I should have
grabbed Warren/Butts/Meggett :-)
Celler Dweller in FFL_A (Hey I Climbed out for 1 week)..
Dozers
|
61.908 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:17 | 2 |
| Woops someone snuck in (WHO IS THAT GUY) Last note should be -2, and -3
:-)
|
61.909 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:22 | 7 |
61.910 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:23 | 7 |
|
> They play Houston on a thursday after a week off.
speaking of which anyone hear from Doc lately??
The Crazy Met
|
61.911 | btw tb - left a spot fer ya in pool_94 | 25022::BREEN | | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:27 | 5 |
| tommy,
ya left out the poetry in casey atthebat iambic and the fractured xmas
carols.
doggerel bill
|
61.912 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I feeel so good... | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:28 | 6 |
| Mail was sent by a couple of people yesterday. No response that I
know of. I called him Monday after it was 20-0. He mumbled something
about running Buddy and Moon out of town and this was what they got.
Something else about the Vikes, it was in between too many "ooh, that
was a good hit" and "nice fumble Bucky you (expletive deleted)'s"
|
61.913 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Oct 05 1994 17:43 | 5 |
| good to know Doc hasn't changed. lessee if the current denizens of this
topic will/will not change.
The Crazy Met
|
61.914 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 07 1994 12:50 | 33 |
61.915 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I feeel so good... | Fri Oct 07 1994 13:47 | 2 |
| ... and even or hold your peace... (or is it piece?)
|
61.916 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Oct 07 1994 13:48 | 1 |
| none of that now, this is a family conference!
|
61.917 | Shoulda just put me down | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Fri Oct 07 1994 13:52 | 3 |
|
Paul I'm there.
|
61.918 | Cain't support the Pats | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Oct 07 1994 14:07 | 7 |
| The Dawgs Sip,
But I ain't no Patsie rooter.
Let's talk when they play the Broncs.
zamboni
|
61.919 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 07 1994 14:49 | 4 |
61.920 | | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Oct 07 1994 14:53 | 8 |
| > Sweeney from mass, a donks fan... can you say bandwagon jumper!
Nope,
cross country mover. I grew up in Boulder and Longmont Colorado.
I pass orange water!
t
|
61.921 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Once, there was this boy who, went to Singapore | Fri Oct 07 1994 14:54 | 2 |
| I bet that's from steroid use though...
|
61.922 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Oct 07 1994 15:44 | 2 |
| I think the choice of pnames limits the creative juices flowing in this
tavern.
|
61.923 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Back among the living | Fri Oct 07 1994 16:44 | 5 |
| My favorite teams are the STEELERS and any team that plays the
Brownscum from Cleveturd.
JaKe
|
61.924 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Oct 09 1994 19:44 | 6 |
61.926 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 10 1994 09:49 | 8 |
61.927 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Once, there was this boy who, went to Singapore | Mon Oct 10 1994 11:02 | 6 |
| Is she even a fan? She's never entered a note in the Pats topic
besides making fun of Marky...
Watch it, that could be a slanderous accusation (smiley goes here).
|
61.928 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 11 1994 12:37 | 14 |
61.929 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Oct 11 1994 14:47 | 4 |
| Re: Houston
When will Cleveland play an NFL team this season? They only played 1
(Pittsburgh) so far and now they're too skeert to play another.
|
61.930 | Pats 8-8, Cle 9-7, doesnt make them a better team :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Oct 11 1994 16:05 | 18 |
| Well Cleveland and The Pats both have the same rated schedule (IN terms
of winning percentage from last year) but face it the Pats play in the
AFC East which means buffalo and Miami twice, and Indy with Faulk.
Cleveland plays the Begaloos twice and the Moonless Oilers Id say its
pretty obvious who will end up with the better record. Cleveland will
win 1 more game then the pats and becuase they play in the central they
have a slight better chance then the pats at making the playoffs. A P
name bet means nothing to me, I think the pats will beat Cleveland and
Cleveland will end up with 1 more win which will put them into the
playoffs and leave the pats at home. (pats finish 8-8, Cle 9-7).
This 15part plan sounds like a politicians way of being a weasle, ok
if cleveland beats the pats by 12 pts and has 2more win then New
England and has more guys on the team with birthdays in the month of
November I'll run Naked thru the mill :-)
mab
|
61.931 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 11 1994 21:28 | 4 |
61.932 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Oct 12 1994 13:15 | 2 |
| Being sorry and absent-minded will get you nowhere. No wonder that EV5
chip has been on a perpetual release.
|
61.933 | 'roids and colors | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Oct 12 1994 13:15 | 14 |
| re: .921 Waltman
> I bet that's from steroid use though...
No man, you got it all wrong. Orange is just natural for Bronco fans.
To get Orange with Blue stripes on game day requires 'roids on Saturday to
get ones self ready for the game the nexted day.
Waltman, you obviously still haven't learned the proper way to use
'roids. It' no wonder your bring your artificial bat to the softball plate
instead of your natural woody.
zamboni
|
61.934 | just plain surprised | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Oct 12 1994 13:32 | 34 |
|
It is actually very surprising the Browns have done so well this
season so far with all the injuries they have sustained.
Michael Jackson has been bothered with a hamstring problem and
has even sat the last two games because of it.
Mark Carrier has the same injury.
Patric Rowe is out with a knee injury.
Walter Reives is now out for the season.
Tommy Vardell is out for the season.
But yet they have still found a way to win. The defense has just
been plain outstanding this season so far and has had no injuries. The
Browns could have ended up with a 1-4 record if the other teams had
played up to their abilities. The Colts have played the Browns hard
the last two year and beaten them squarly both times. I expected alot
tougher game against them but Oh No.....the Browns squashed them. The
Jets also have played well against the Browns and have beaten them the
last two times they faced.....not pretty....but Oh No....the Browns
squashed them. I expected lots more out of the Arizona team and
wouldn't have been surprised if the Browns had lost that game but.....
OH NO....the DAWGS were relentless by spanking them too. Then, the
game they should have won, they gave away to the rust capital of the
world and sewage pit know as the Squeelers led by the Browns wanabe
Jake the Fake. At any rate, the Browns will have their chance on
National TV to show the US what kind of team they really are. Look
for the Browns D to dominate and the offense to make do and score
35 points and move to 5-1.
WOOF
|
61.935 | | HANNAH::ASHE | What's the frequency, Robert? | Wed Oct 12 1994 13:46 | 4 |
| So, being a Lion fan, that's why I pee silver when I drink a lot of
beer? I don't do steroids, so I haven't seen the Honolulu Blue
yet...
|
61.936 | yuk... | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Wed Oct 12 1994 16:07 | 5 |
|
I would guess that first thing in the morning we're all Packer fans then...!
;)
|
61.937 | 11-8 ugly win | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Oct 14 1994 11:44 | 27 |
|
Surprised that there isn't much being said about the game last
night.
It wasn't a pretty game by all means but, the Browns did win and
the Dawg D did the job. Mark Carrier played a great game, should have
seen some of the moves he put on that Lewis fellow. Now if Vinnie
could only throw the ball. There were three long pass to Mark and he
got himself wide open. Two were short, one was long and the other was
behind him. One was intercepted. Vinnie looked terrible! There were
some good drives with no points but all in all, a win is a win. The
Browns D had chances to INT several balls but only came away with one.
Langham had 3 of the chances, I think he was just surprised that the
ball seemed like it was thrown just to him. Great punting job by Mr.
Tupa! Tupa also got his 3rd 2pt conversion or was it his 4th. Lots
of pentalties in the game.
Way to go DAWGS!
On to Cincy next week....
4 in a row and a record of 5-1. 1st in the AFC Central!
The way it ought to be! The way it will be! The way it is!
WOOF
|
61.938 | The box score looked painfully boring... | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Fri Oct 14 1994 11:51 | 2 |
|
How close was Del Greco's missed field goal in the 4th?
|
61.939 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 14 1994 11:53 | 10 |
|
I have renewed confidence that the Browns are a candidate to drop 4 or
5 in a row, 4 out of 5, something like that, when they hit the tough
part of their schedule. Testaverde is still Testaverde. You can't
just paint him brown and think he's going to be better. That
color-blindness problem around the opposing team's uniforms that
haunted him in Tampa Bay still appears to be present...
glenn
|
61.940 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Fri Oct 14 1994 12:26 | 4 |
| Del Greco FG = OT crapshoot
The Crazy Met
|
61.941 | Things could have been different | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Oct 14 1994 12:48 | 5 |
|
very close miss. If the football was twice as big, it would have
hit the post an went in......
WOOF
|
61.942 | No argument from me. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Oct 14 1994 12:53 | 7 |
|
I also agree about Vinny. Didn't like it when he took over and
don't have a whole lot of confidence that he is the man for the
Browns. I say give Tupa a chance. I like him!
WOOF!
|
61.943 | Good D | HBAHBA::HAAS | australopithecus westvirginius | Fri Oct 14 1994 12:57 | 15 |
| Is it just me or does Vinny act like a sissy?
I mean, evertime he has pressure, he looks like he's just happy to unload
the ball anywhere down field. I doubt he gets to see many of his
receptions because he's too busy running for cover.
The firsted interception by Lewis looked like it surprised him as much as
anyone else. He was one-on-one with Carrier and it sorta hit him in the
arm and stuck.
I will say this about that: the Cleveland D looks like they can play with
almost anyone. I kept wondering, though, what they'd look like defending
Emmett Smith and the Cowboys.
TTom
|
61.944 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Oct 14 1994 13:08 | 10 |
|
The one INT against Carrier looked to me like it could have been
called interferance.
E. Smith.....probibly like it looked when the Browns played against
Faulk and Foster. they'll get a short TD but total yardage will be
low. We'll see later in the season. Anyone have the game stats?
WOOF!
|
61.945 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Oct 14 1994 13:11 | 12 |
|
Also, it should be noted that how can the Oilers D be rated #1
against the pass. There were just too many open receivers last night
that there is no way I'd say they should be rated #1. They did however
stop the rush of the Browns but that was to be expected with the
injuries the Browns have.
Byner is going to have to step up. Kitchen the TE should be let
go. What a bumbler.
WOOF
|
61.946 | Don't get too pumped Hal.. | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Oct 14 1994 13:24 | 9 |
| The Browns are having a good but not ok season so far.
They looked mediocre against Houston last night, one of the weaker teams
in the league. Yeah, I know, the Dawgs be 5-1 this season. But their
opponents are 7-21 combined. Let's see how the Dawgs do against some
tough teams. When they play the 'Boys in December, that will be a true test
for the Dawgs.
zamboni
|
61.947 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Fri Oct 14 1994 13:25 | 17 |
|
> I have renewed confidence that the Browns are a candidate to drop 4 or
> 5 in a row, 4 out of 5, something like that, when they hit the tough
> part of their schedule.
4 of 5 looks about right. Two things can be said for the Browns,
though - they've beat the teams they should, and other than at QB
they've got a good team. Sure, there's room for improvement - but
other than at QB there's no glaring hole.
> Testaverde is still Testaverde. You can't
> just paint him brown and think he's going to be better.
Precisely. Add a great QB, and the team is a serious Super Bowl
contender.
Joe
|
61.948 | Just call me RCASO | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Oct 14 1994 13:52 | 11 |
| reL -.2
>The Browns are having a good but not ok season so far.
shoulda read
The Browns are having an ok but not good season so far.
Teach me to type and stuff beef stew down my throat at the same time.
zamboni
|
61.949 | Congrats good win vs A division Rival... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 14 1994 14:29 | 24 |
| 7-21 but there wins are vs 4-18 (I think ?)... Good win, any win in
the division is a good win and with Cinncy coming up you can start
typing Browns are 6-1 :-) and there next 2 games after that are not
powerhouse's :-) (Denver, 7-1) then (pats, hopefully a pats win).
They still have to prove they can beat (and are a better team) then
pittsburg, if the browns are lucky the 2nd game vs Pittsburg wont
mean anything (They better hope theyve clinched the division by then).
Every team has games THAT THEY SHOULD WIN and Cleveland has done that
they have a GRUELING stretch coming up and they may make all of us
Vinny Beleivers :-)
But Id like to remind some certain Cleveland fans to be carefull, you
fans have to be the worst JINKS's in the world of sports. Being A
bulls ran I can remember many a times cleveland fans ranting and raven
about what there cavs were going to do to the bulls and then making up
excuse's (100% of the time).... They have the best team in the AFC
central (Clearly the weakest division in football) but outside of that
they havnt proved anything (YET)... PHI/KC/HOU/NYG/DAL/PIT/SEA will all
be tough games and losing 6 of 7 could happen... I wouldnt buy any SB
tickets just yet :-)
mab
|
61.950 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Oct 16 1994 17:22 | 6 |
61.951 | Cleveland may have just got a HUGE break in Pittsburg | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Oct 19 1994 12:02 | 16 |
| The best thing that could have happened to clevlend happened this
weekend. Pittsburg (the only team to beat cleveland so far) just
lost foster for 3 weeks in which Pittsburg has NYG, ARZ and Houston
those could be very scaries game's for Pittsburg without foster, and
they could lose them all. ANd then when foster gets back Pittsburg
has Buffalo, Miami, Raiders (Plus Philly and SD) thats no cake walk
schedule giving cleveland could win there next 3 games.
This will make things very intresting, Dont want to downgrade Cleveland
but I do feel that the WC teams in the East/West divisions (KC/BUF) are
better teams then Cleveland so whoever the 3rd WC team is will have the
best matchup (IF cleveland holds onto the central).
Still Hopeing the pats can take out Miami and then Cleveland :-)
mab
|
61.952 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Oct 19 1994 13:20 | 17 |
|
They don't play buddy ball in Cleveland.......they play Billy Ball.
I'd also love to see the Patsies play Cleveland in the playoffs...
Moven on up.........
Just read an artical about Jim Brown going to Clevelands practice
yesterday instead of the usual Friday and Saturday because he wants
to make sure the DAWGS don't take the Bangles lightly this weekend.
Good idea!
Go Browns!
WOOF!
|
61.953 | | CAMONE::WAY | Charge men, for God's sake, Charge! | Wed Oct 19 1994 14:10 | 12 |
| >
> Just read an artical about Jim Brown going to Clevelands practice
> yesterday instead of the usual Friday and Saturday because he wants
> to make sure the DAWGS don't take the Bangles lightly this weekend.
>
WOW!
I guess since his movie career hit the skids he's got too much free
time on his hands......
|
61.954 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | AtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th. | Wed Oct 19 1994 15:50 | 1 |
| He's gonna try out. Says he can still play with and against any team.
|
61.955 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | It's nobody's fault but mine.... | Sun Oct 23 1994 23:14 | 5 |
| Combined records of the teams that the Brown(spot)s(tm) have beat is
now 10-31. Tough schedule, eh???
JaKe
|
61.956 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 24 1994 07:11 | 8 |
61.957 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Mon Oct 24 1994 12:06 | 9 |
|
>> Sour grapes from JaKe would obviously bowled poorly lasted night.
Anyone who remembered their decoder ring this morning care to take
a stab at this one???
billl
|
61.958 | | HANNAH::ASHE | til the sun comes up over Santa Monica Blvd | Mon Oct 24 1994 12:38 | 2 |
| boweled maybe? not sure?
|
61.959 | Cleveland could = NYG | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:22 | 13 |
| Cleveland is #2 in the afc. CLeveland and SD are both 6-1, they
havnt played head to head there both 5-1 in the afc, if division
records are used, SD wins. IF common opponents are used in any
way its a tie, but in pts scored (total or vs common opp's are used)
sd wins... In no tie break does Cleveland get the nod over sd so they
are #2 in the AFC right now... :-)
Next too weeks are huge if cleveland is to have a succesful season they
may need the next 2 weeks as wins...Will be intresting to see if
cleveland is the NYG of the AFC, can only win the easy games and pad
there record then lose to anyone who resembles a team..
mab
|
61.960 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Locked out of the gene pool | Wed Oct 26 1994 16:35 | 16 |
|
Just talked to --dan'l, and he wanted me to pass on a message for him
concerning the Brown(spot)s(tm) and their fast approaching midnight in
thier cinderella season.
JaKe
****************************************************************************
HALpocricy coming soon to a note near you November 13th, look for sneak
previews in the coming weeks.
--dan'l
|
61.961 | go broncos | BSS::MARLAND | | Thu Oct 27 1994 10:11 | 2 |
| the browns game with the broncos will not be easy, matter of fact
I think they'll lose.
|
61.962 | Good Luck Browns, your luck may be running out.. | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Oct 27 1994 10:18 | 14 |
| The Browns will be in trouble if they lose to denver, seeing that there
going to lose to the pats the following week. They could easily lose 5
of there last 7 which would put them at 8-8 and out of the playoffs.
It will be intresting they Play New England, Kansas City and Seattle
all of which have a shot at wildcard contenders so all of these games
could have playoff implications (I know 90% of the games do).
Seattle has a shot at a .500 season, as well has NE so both of them
with one break there way could hit the magic 9 wins mark.. Will be
intresting to see if pittsburg can keep pace with Cleveland over the
next 3 weeks...
mab
|
61.963 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Oct 27 1994 10:59 | 16 |
|
I think this year's Browns will prove to be an excellent study of
the importance of special teams...
Offensively and defensively, the Browns are OK, with the only thing
that really differentiates the team being their ability to make
big plays.
But the special teams have been great, the sole exception being
Stover (who's been OK).
I think the Browns will win the next two, which should be enough to
put them in the playoff (assuming they can win at least one of the
last seven games, which I'm sure they can).
Joe
|
61.964 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Oct 27 1994 17:28 | 4 |
|
Need I remind everyone what ole Art said......?
WOOF
|
61.965 | How can you not mention the DAWG D | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Oct 27 1994 17:30 | 6 |
|
Read .0 if you don't remember. It will come true!
WOOF WOOF
|
61.966 | He'd have put it in writing 'cept Dawg Pound cain't read | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 27 1994 17:46 | 9 |
|
> Read .0 if you don't remember. It will come true!
That was last year. The Browns didn't make the playoffs; Art didn't
move out of town. With any luck he'll continue break his promises
with the other stuff...
glenn
|
61.968 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Save a sheep, neuter a W.Virginian!! | Thu Oct 27 1994 17:56 | 9 |
|
glenn, if ya look, the HALquote of 'ol Farty Art says within 3 years.
this will be the second year that they don't win the division title.
JaKe
|
61.969 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 28 1994 10:32 | 8 |
61.970 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Fri Oct 28 1994 11:10 | 7 |
|
> I fully expect to take serious crap if the Donks win.
you got that right!
The Crazy Met
|
61.971 | Denver wins in OT? | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Fri Oct 28 1994 11:43 | 13 |
|
When you consider the Browns have played against teams with a combined
15/35 .300 record and Broncos 31/18 .632, this may turn out to be a close
game. Denver has the 5th AFC offense and 14th Defense. The Browns have
the 10th Offense and the 4th Defense. Elways the 5th afc Qb with 3
receivers in the top 20 for receptions and Vinnie is 13th with no one in
the top 20. The rush offesne is a draw ( 3 yards ave diff) with the Browns
10th and Denver 11th in the AFC.
It looks like Altitude or Attitude will decide this one.
|
61.972 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 28 1994 12:09 | 20 |
61.973 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 28 1994 12:09 | 6 |
61.974 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Fri Oct 28 1994 12:23 | 8 |
|
> but if the browns win... there will be lots of bragging!
yeah well that will be a real surprise!
The Crazy Met
|
61.975 | Yeah but... | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Oct 28 1994 12:59 | 9 |
| Groaner was looking for anybody to do a pname bet with when the Dawgs
were playing the Patsies. Now that the 'Spots are playing their old Nemesis
this weekend, it appears Groaner doesn't have the guts to make the bet!
No surprise there I guess.
Any other real men Brownie fans got enough cajones to make a pname bet?
zamboni
|
61.976 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Fri Oct 28 1994 13:01 | 8 |
| >> tcm, i will take my beating on monday for the regulars, not the
>> fly-by-night noters...
You will TAKE it and you will LIKE it!
billl
|
61.977 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Fri Oct 28 1994 13:19 | 6 |
|
I'll make a p-name wager with Ice. As long as it's a mainly
bet.....NO POINTS! Straight up. Something Slasher would know
nothing about........
Claybone
|
61.978 | You're on Claybone | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Oct 28 1994 14:56 | 8 |
| A manly bet. No points, straight up. The loser has to enter in at least one
note a day next week with the pname "The Browns/Broncos are the BEST team in the
NFL!" Broncos/Browns, of course, is whichever is the winning team.
Any other non-wussy Browns lovers? I love how they all run for cover when
they're team hops on their choker charter to Mile-high!
zamboni
|
61.979 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Fri Oct 28 1994 15:19 | 6 |
|
I'll take the bet, provided I can choose something a bit more poetic
than "The Browns are the BEST team in the NFL!" as the loser's
pname when the Browns win...
Joe
|
61.980 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Fri Oct 28 1994 15:29 | 5 |
|
I think you got me pegged wrong there zamboni. I'm a Donk fan
and I was challenging Iceman (aka Groaner).
Claybone
|
61.981 | Browns win Division... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 28 1994 15:48 | 19 |
| Good example with the 65-55 55-65 but this is not quite that even.
Face it the browns have played 1 good team regardless of there
records, the Steelers and I wont remind you of the outcome. Now
they Play denver a good team with a bad record. The other teams they
beat (Cinncy, Arz, ind, NYJ, Hou, Cin) are not power houses. Although
I will say the Arizona and houston were good wins, many people felt
these 2 teams would be doing alot better (Arz may have a better record
if buddy didnt play QB swap games and Hou has had a slew of Injuries).
But theyve had a VERY EASY SCHEDULE and theyve taken advantage of it.
BUT a few of them came on special teams and defense, in other words the
other team made 2 many mistakes. Come closer to playoff time the GOOD
teams won make as many mistakes...
My prediction is Browns finish 10-6, Pittsburg 9-7....but Good luck in
the playoffs depending on Tie Breakers you could have to play KC, SD,
MIA or BUF the first week....
mab
|
61.982 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Fri Oct 28 1994 16:33 | 4 |
| sigh I'm away Sunday-Tuesday and will miss out on the fun :-(
The Crazy Met
|
61.983 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 28 1994 19:27 | 4 |
61.984 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Oct 28 1994 19:30 | 9 |
61.985 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Sun Oct 30 1994 21:09 | 4 |
61.986 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Oct 31 1994 09:03 | 7 |
|
You know you're in trouble when...
Vinny Testaverde talks about retiring, and you're worried that it
will lower your team's talent at QB.
Joe
|
61.987 | The Iceman is a real man | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Mon Oct 31 1994 09:40 | 6 |
| A salute to you Ice,
Didn't get a chance to read this over the weekend. Nice to see you
living up to the p-name bet none the less.
zamboni
|
61.988 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Mon Oct 31 1994 09:50 | 7 |
|
Ice,
Being the magnanimous fella I am, the p-name zamboni branded
you with will suffice to cover our wager. It looks good on you.
Claybone
|
61.989 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 31 1994 10:37 | 1 |
| Have the Dawgs ever won at Pile-it High(tm) Stadium?
|
61.990 | go broncos | BSS::MARLAND | | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:11 | 2 |
| to all you cleveland assholes who thought you would beat my broncos,
ha ha ha. You won't f*ck with my team again.
|
61.991 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:14 | 2 |
|
Sheez.....
|
61.993 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:20 | 6 |
61.994 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:31 | 3 |
| RE .990: Who left the outhouse door open?
Mark.
|
61.995 | Cmon Groaner #22 burned this team | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Networks Sales & Marketing | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:31 | 8 |
| How about a Game analysis ?
Offensively the Browns didn't run block at all. Look at the facts folks Denver
has no defense.
Defense was called for a totally BOGUS interference.
Eric Metcalf looked in the mirror and saw Glynn Milburn.
Jeff
|
61.996 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:35 | 1 |
| So that's what happens when you take this stuff so seriously!
|
61.997 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:38 | 9 |
| Yeah, nice mouth.
If I wasn't under the weather today, I'd set it hidden.....
Iceman, is that the cool kind of paste that kids used to eat in Kindergarten?
'Saw
|
61.998 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:42 | 9 |
|
You know, this p-name is starting to grow on me.
It's so ridiculous - given the performance of the Broncos this
season - that it's kinda funny.
I think I'll keep it. B^}
Joe
|
61.999 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:48 | 2 |
| I think Joe is actually a closet Donk fan! Congrats to the Coloradans
on their new convert.
|
61.1000 | Clevescum Snarf | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:48 | 1 |
|
|
61.1001 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:48 | 4 |
61.1002 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:49 | 1 |
| I always thought DAWG fans were on glue.
|
61.1003 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:50 | 3 |
61.1004 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:54 | 14 |
|
> I think Joe is actually a closet Donk fan! Congrats to the Coloradans
> on their new convert.
Yup, of course.
Elway is Dog! Um, er, God!
Glynn Milburn is the second coming of Jim Brown! Er, wait, scratch
that... of Walter Payton!
How'm I doin'?
Joe
|
61.1006 | Could we have a ruling, please? ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:55 | 13 |
|
> You know, this p-name is starting to grow on me.
>
> It's so ridiculous - given the performance of the Broncos this
> season - that it's kinda funny.
Whoa, now, implied p-name sarcasm is _not_ permitted-- either that, or
I'm going to have a real hard time keeping a straight face with that
"Browns have an awesome squad" garbage that it looks like I'll be
wearing next week...
glenn
|
61.1007 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Oct 31 1994 14:57 | 9 |
|
Glenn,
I didn't write it (or the Browns message, for that matter).
I'll avoid pointing out any inconsistencies in my p-name for
the rest of the week.
Joe
|
61.1008 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Mon Oct 31 1994 15:21 | 5 |
| Rubber Cement is COOL.
I always liked the kind with the applicator tip that you had to slit open...
I miss those big fat red pencils too....
|
61.1009 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Mon Oct 31 1994 15:40 | 5 |
61.1010 | HAL watch day 3 | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Nov 02 1994 21:42 | 6 |
| ICE, nice p_name; good to see 'ya not disappear.
But where is HAL???
The Crazy Met
|
61.1011 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Wed Nov 02 1994 22:48 | 6 |
61.1012 | Big game for the DAWGS | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Nov 03 1994 07:28 | 18 |
|
What, I didn't know I was missing.....at any rate.....I didn't see
the game last weekend but did hear that our rookie secondary man,
Antonio missplayed two balls last week.....one witch set up the game
winning TD when Russell caught a 5 yard pass and turned it into a
45 yard gain because Antonio missed.
I can give him one game but lets not make it two.
The Browns will come back this week in the Pound and beat up on
the hopeless Pats. Now that ole Vinnie is out, look for more
supporters to jump on the bandwagon. Suposibly, Vinnie is
contemplating retirement now that he's been hit in the head a few
times. Lets see what Mark can do!
Go DAWGS!
WOOF! WOOF!
|
61.1013 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Fri Nov 04 1994 09:25 | 35 |
61.1015 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Fri Nov 04 1994 10:06 | 5 |
61.1017 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Fri Nov 04 1994 12:03 | 36 |
61.1019 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Fri Nov 04 1994 14:21 | 3 |
61.1020 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | SAVE THE WORLD, NUKE OHIO!!! | Fri Nov 04 1994 15:58 | 4 |
| wouldn't be the first time one went over yer haid, Groaner.
JaKe
|
61.1021 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The Donks are a premier NFL team, and they own the Dawgs | Sun Nov 06 1994 12:48 | 6 |
61.1022 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | awaiting final outcome of Dawgs-Pats game | Sun Nov 06 1994 12:49 | 3 |
61.1023 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Politically incorrect & damn proud of it | Sun Nov 06 1994 16:53 | 7 |
|
>> Its going to be wet and wild in Cleveland.
What, has Bernice returned and gotten excited????
JaKe
|
61.1024 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULES, Pats SIP! | Sun Nov 06 1994 20:33 | 4 |
61.1025 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sun Nov 06 1994 20:33 | 3 |
61.1026 | The pass interference call on Hurst was a joke | AD::HEATH | Dawgs rule Pats sip | Mon Nov 07 1994 07:25 | 20 |
|
What a joke of a game. The Patriettes are going backwards fast.
Finishing at 500 this year is totally out of the question and if they
don't win another game I would not be surprised. Play calling still
continues to be a question. They started to run the ball early and
just kept going to the same play. Eventually the defense will find a
way to stop the Butts over Kratch/Armstrong play. Bledsoe seems to be
a little gun shy the last couple of games. I know I wouldn't want 300
plus lineman hitting me for 3 hours but sometimes you have to step up.
He hasn't in about a month. Coates has been taken out of the game for
about the same time so maybe we are seeing how good Bledsoe really is,
take away his best receiver and he becomes a non factor.
The Browns did not play a very good game but well enough to win
and I quess that is what counts, but if anyone thinks they are going
anywhere in the 'offs they're soft as a grape.
Jerry
|
61.1027 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 07 1994 08:06 | 4 |
61.1028 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Nov 07 1994 08:32 | 15 |
|
I didn't take the P_name bet so I can still say the Brown 'Spots
sip. Cleveland's defence is very strong, even without Michael Dean
Perry. They hammered any Pariot who tried to catch a ball over the
middle. I'm a Giants fan, and I loved Pepper Johnson when he was with
the Giants. Did he cover Coates like a glove yesterday, great job.
Don't know if it was the wind or not. The Browns offence needs some
work. When Metcalf is a non-factor like he was yesterday. The Browns
can't do much on offence.
I think that penalty on Hurst was a little cheap. It should have
been a non-call at best, The ball was un-catchable. The Browns
receiver pushed off against Hurst to get around him. Then Hurst makes
the classic mistake of retalitation.
Ron
|
61.1029 | They wanted it more | AD::HEATH | Dawgs rule Pats sip | Mon Nov 07 1994 08:43 | 3 |
|
I won't talk negative just being honest. :*)
|
61.1030 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 07 1994 09:42 | 9 |
61.1031 | Settling my part of the Pname bet... | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN SWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Mon Nov 07 1994 09:50 | 14 |
|
The PNAME doesn't bother me, I already knew the Pats Sip.
The Browns D played very well. Excellent job of removing
Coates from the game almost completely. Played the wideouts
nice and tight, it helps when you know the Pats have no deep
threat. And put enough pressure on Bledsoe all day long to have him
constantly making bad throws/decsions....
Cleveland's offense sucks however...
JimH
|
61.1032 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 07 1994 10:03 | 16 |
|
Naw, Hurst didn't even retaliate. He had his arm held down only
slightly and just pulled it away. It was just a blown call all the
way. Throw in da refs' inability to recognize a fumble (twice) and
it's pretty clear that Art Modell and his money had an emotional
stake in this p-name bet... ;-)
Seriously, though, it now looks as if at the end of the season we
might be saying that the Patriots actually regressed this season,
over last. Maybe it's just perception but it sure seems as if
there were more positives last year, with things like the play of the
O-line and the defense, even through all the losing. Now we're just
seeing all-around ineptitude...
glenn
|
61.1033 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 07 1994 11:47 | 13 |
|
>> Seriously, though, it now looks as if at the end of the season we
>> might be saying that the Patriots actually regressed this season,
>> over last.
And Bledsoe seems to get worse by the game. Very dumb interception
throwing it into heavy traffic when the Pats were driving. More than
once he threw while simultaneously ducking a la Tony "The Turtle"
Eason. Of course, it didn't help that the receiving corps often can't
get open and when they did they didn't catch some pretty easy balls.
Still, if it was anybody but Parcells we might have a QB controversy
on our hansa but Bill is as stubborn as they come.
|
61.1034 | | CAMONE::WAY | Take me, subcreature! | Mon Nov 07 1994 12:16 | 10 |
| > Still, if it was anybody but Parcells we might have a QB controversy
> on our hansa but Bill is as stubborn as they come.
Yabbut, that might pay off in the long run for Bledsoe. I remember
that's what Parcells did to Simms.
They kind of have to take their lumps. Bledsoe's breakdowns are probably
more mental from the pressure that's building, I'd bet.....
|
61.1035 | | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN SWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Mon Nov 07 1994 12:23 | 43 |
|
> And Bledsoe seems to get worse by the game. Very dumb interception
>throwing it into heavy traffic when the Pats were driving. More than
>once he threw while simultaneously ducking a la Tony "The Turtle"
>Eason.
Yup, Bledsoe didn't exactly look like an all-pro QB yesterday, for
sure. But I think there were a couple of encouraging signs that Drew is
continue to develop. A couple of weeks ago you were complaining that
Bledsoe didn't know what to do when the blitz was being shown. Well at
least yesterday he reacted fequently by changing the play at the line
of scrimmage. Unfortunately their execution under the pressure stunk.
One partucular sequence, early in the 3rd, typified their poor play.
On 2nd and long, the Browns safties come up, Drew audibles and drifts
back for a screen, but has the pass battered down (The Pats can't run a
screen play to save their lives, Parcells should review the Browns for
example of how to do it right!) Then on 3rd down, the corner blitz
comes from Hawkins side, Bledsoe takes 3 steps and hits Hawkins in the
hands with a quick pass, incomplete.
On the other hand, I agree with you 100% about the throwing, while
ducking comment. The kid had nervous feet yesterday. Think he's getting
tired of getting nailed?
If nothing else, this year Bledsoe will learn how to handle the
Blitz, or die trying.....
> Of course, it didn't help that the receiving corps often can't
>get open and when they did they didn't catch some pretty easy balls.
>Still, if it was anybody but Parcells we might have a QB controversy
>on our hansa but Bill is as stubborn as they come.
So you think Bledsoe should have been pulled yesterday? Would
Zolak have done any better? You your self admit the receivers weren't
exactly great yesterday either.... Just curious...
JimH
|
61.1036 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Politically incorrect & damn proud of it | Mon Nov 07 1994 12:51 | 5 |
| Hey Groaner, on the call on Hurst, the receiver din't get "hit at the
2", more like he pushed off at the 2.
JaKe
|
61.1037 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 07 1994 12:53 | 32 |
| >> One partucular sequence, early in the 3rd, typified their poor play.
>> On 2nd and long, the Browns safties come up, Drew audibles and drifts
>> back for a screen, but has the pass battered down (The Pats can't run a
>> screen play to save their lives, Parcells should review the Browns for
>> example of how to do it right!)
I'd blame Bledsoe not Parcells for the poor execution on that screen.
He tipped that play from the beginning. I can't imagine that there
was anyone not expecting a screen the way he kept back pedaling and
looking in that direction.
>> On the other hand, I agree with you 100% about the throwing, while
>> ducking comment. The kid had nervous feet yesterday. Think he's getting
>> tired of getting nailed?
Tired of getting nailed? I don't think he's getting nailed all that
much and when he does it's because he hasn't got the good sense to
get rid of the ball when there's nothing there. He certainly isn't
taking the kind of punishment that Grogan used to take.
>> So you think Bledsoe should have been pulled yesterday? Would
>> Zolak have done any better? You your self admit the receivers
>> weren't exactly great yesterday either.... Just curious...
I think he's not getting the job done. He was obviously green and
now he's obviously lost his confidence. And as evidence of how
he doesn't always use the best judgement (I refrain from saying he's
dim), I submit the two hail mary passes. Neither of them reached
the end zone so what's the point, Drew? Why even bother?
|
61.1038 | The worst offense in the NFL right now... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 07 1994 12:59 | 20 |
|
I don't know if Bledsoe's getting "dumber" or if in a sense he's
quitting. Which is worse is open to debate. To hear Cris
Collinsworth tell it Ben Coates also gave up in the 4th quarter,
and Michael Timpson was about the only guy out there capable of
anything, and it wasn't much. Whether it's Bledsoe or Zolak
(I'd have no problem with a "message" benching at this point)
the interceptions are going to continue to pile up, because when
you fall behind, a goal of not making mistakes isn't sufficient,
yet at the same time there appears to be little offered by
the receivers. So it comes down to a choice of eating the ball
often and losing, or trying to force something to happen and losing.
The offense just lacks talent far too severely at key skill positions.
Speaking of which, whatever happened to Blair Thomas? Was he held out
by injury or coach's decision or did I just miss him? Someone capable
of an occasional outside run wouldn't hurt...
glenn
|
61.1039 | better days ahead | BSS::MARLAND | | Mon Nov 07 1994 12:59 | 8 |
| man, i can't believe all this negative stuff about Drew. He's young,
he's gonna make mistakes. Out here in Colorado we've had to put
up with Elway making stupid mistakes this year and he suppose to
know better. I haven't seen to many patriot games this year but
from the ones i've seen i can see why he has nervous feet. I just
hate to see you patriot fans so hard on him, i think he's gonna be
great in the future.
|
61.1040 | Down 7 with one last play, what did you want to see? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 07 1994 13:23 | 13 |
|
> And as evidence of how
> he doesn't always use the best judgement (I refrain from saying he's
> dim), I submit the two hail mary passes. Neither of them reached
> the end zone so what's the point, Drew? Why even bother?
Why would you submit those plays as a question of judgment? Both were
obvious Hail Mary situations. That they didn't get there was a matter
of execution, possibly affected by the wind but irrelevant in any case.
glenn
|
61.1041 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 07 1994 13:50 | 15 |
| >> -< Down 7 with one last play, what did you want to see? >-
I wanted to see him loft it into the end zone instead of to a
specific receiver five yards short of the end zone. As it was,
even if one of the Pats managed to catch the ball, they would
have been tackled and the half and later the game would have
been over. To me, it just pointed to more poor judgement on
Bledsoe's part.
BTW - what Collinsworth said about Voates was that he had either
given up or he was exhausted. The cameras immediately cut to
Coates who was gasping for breath between plays.
|
61.1042 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Nov 07 1994 14:28 | 5 |
| Glenn with a p_name! will wonders never
cease??
The Crazy Met
|
61.1043 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Nov 07 1994 14:51 | 6 |
|
> Glenn with a p_name! will wonders never cease??
That's what happens when he bets against Cleveland... B^)
Joe
|
61.1044 | | CAMONE::WAY | Take me, subcreature! | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:09 | 5 |
| Glenn's a good sport. Heck, he's even a Cal Ripkin fan (which never stopped
me from liking him) 8^)
'Saw
|
61.1045 | You don't see me calling him Gehreg... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:15 | 6 |
|
> Glenn's a good sport. Heck, he's even a Cal Ripkin fan (which never stopped
> me from liking him) 8^)
That's Ripken, you big dummy... ;-)
|
61.1046 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:25 | 8 |
|
>> -< The worst offense in the NFL right now... >-
BTW, this is a bit of an exaggerration as well. Take away
a few (well, quite a few) painful turnovers and this team
manages to put some points on the board and at least has
some offensive weapons. Tampa Bay, on the other hand,
couldn't score at the Mustang Ranch.
|
61.1047 | | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:44 | 53 |
|
>I'd blame Bledsoe not Parcells for the poor execution on that screen.
>He tipped that play from the beginning. I can't imagine that there
>was anyone not expecting a screen the way he kept back pedaling and
>looking in that direction.
Didn't mean to imply that Parcells was to blame, definitely crummy
execution on Drews part. He needed to lob the ball over the oncoming
rush. The reference to Parcells was because as head coach he's
responsible for preparing a game plan for next week. He should show the
Pats some film of the Browns screen pass as an example of how its done
right....
> Tired of getting nailed? I don't think he's getting nailed all that
> much and when he does it's because he hasn't got the good sense to
> get rid of the ball when there's nothing there. He certainly isn't
> taking the kind of punishment that Grogan used to take.
He's getting hit a lot after releasing the ball. He may have only
gotten sacked once yesterday, but he picked himself up off the turf an
awful lot. His problem is that he is bailing out as he throws, he has
to learn to finish the pass and not bailing. He going to get hit
anyway.
>>> So you think Bledsoe should have been pulled yesterday? Would
>>> Zolak have done any better? You your self admit the receivers
> >> weren't exactly great yesterday either.... Just curious...
>
> I think he's not getting the job done. He was obviously green and
> now he's obviously lost his confidence. And as evidence of how
> he doesn't always use the best judgement (I refrain from saying he's
> dim), I submit the two hail mary passes. Neither of them reached
> the end zone so what's the point, Drew? Why even bother?
Jeez Tommy. I thought I asked a pretty direct question, but you
managed not to answer it any way. I'll try again, slowly this time:
Do you think Zolak would have done better?????
JimH :-)
|
61.1048 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:00 | 9 |
| He's getting hit a lot after releasing the ball. He may have only
gotten sacked once yesterday, but he picked himself up off the turf an
awful lot. His problem is that he is bailing out as he throws, he has
to learn to finish the pass and not bailing. He going to get hit
anyway.
in layman's terms he needs a set of filberts.........
mike
|
61.1049 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:00 | 19 |
|
>> Jeez Tommy. I thought I asked a pretty direct question, but you
>> managed not to answer it any way. I'll try again, slowly this time:
>> Do you think Zolak would have done better?????
Don't patronize me, Jim. Besides, what the hell am I, Kreskin?
I don't know if Zolak would have done better - no one does. It's
a question that has no answer. Am I supposed to post Zolak's
imaginary stats? I do know that he would have been hard-pressed
to do worse than Bledsoe's four interceptions, his 166 yard total
and besides Zolak has something that Bledsoe doesn't - mobility.
After watching Bledsoe yesterday, I think his watching the next game
from the sideline would be best for everyone involved.
|
61.1050 | Only Tampa is worse than Arizona | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:09 | 3 |
| They had the worst offenses listed during the Cards game yesterday.
The Pats weren't even in the bottom 5 in total points scored so far.
The Pats topped the Cards current level in week 4.
|
61.1051 | Po'po Parcells | 25022::BREEN | | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:19 | 12 |
| All you have to do is watch Ripken play to be a big fan of his.
Pat's need to figure out something they do well and go with it. I
don't see slogging it out with Cleveland whose team picture is found
next to Webster's definition of Slog.
Parcell's is in the state he's in because he sees game after game lost
because his pride wouldn't let him negotiate with Russell. He should
have lost the Packer game too.
I agree with giving Bledsoe a rest except if Zolak does well it'll be
hard to get Bledso back in there again.
|
61.1052 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:35 | 11 |
|
> All you have to do is watch Ripken play to be a big fan of his.
Hmmm... hasn't worked for me, for some reason.
Not that I don't appreciate the things he does do (great offense
early in the season, great defensive positioning), but his single
minded persuit of the consecutive games record really doesn't do
anything for me...
Joe
|
61.1053 | Yeh, I should get out to the park more often | 25022::BREEN | | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:42 | 11 |
| Well my cousing finally dragged me to a game last year and he saved the
night just by the way he plays. It's just a way of playing that a
gifted professional acquires over so many years.
And Gehrig should have taken a few games off once in awhile too. And
if I were managing the O's and in a race year in year out I would want
him in there. If you have that part of the game (infield defense) 50 %
straight (ss 50;2b 25;3b,1b 10% each by my reckoning) you will win a
lot of games.
But it is a visual thing more than a stat thing.
|
61.1054 | The Real teams are a coming but should win 10 | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:44 | 21 |
| Well it dont matter how you win, but between that call on Hearst and
last week's NOCALL on Herman Moore's Knee Down Id say the REFS ARE
GETTING WORSE WEEK TO WEEK...
But you cant argue with FACTS and the FACTS are unless Dallas shutouts
NY Tonight CLevland will have the #1 Defense in the league, I dont care
about yards passing/rushing etc, who cars. Cleveland has allowed a
league low 111pts so far this season... And if Hoard can play against
anyone other then that pats like he did yesturday then Then now have
a Running Game... And we all know Parcells would trade places in a
heartbeat, Cleveland has a Running Game and the Best Defense...
Cleveland must now prove there a contender. They have 3 more easy
games (Hou/NYG/Sea) and those 3 wins will give them 10 on the year
and will put them in the playoffs. But no one will give them credit
if they lose the other 4 games (VS Worthy Opponents). We all remember
what happen to the NYG last year when they won a ton of games vs shmuck
teams, I beleive they got toasted 40something to 3 (Or something Like
that)...
mab
|
61.1055 | | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Mon Nov 07 1994 17:17 | 31 |
|
>>> Do you think Zolak would have done better?????
>
> Don't patronize me, Jim. Besides, what the hell am I, Kreskin?
> I don't know if Zolak would have done better - no one does. It's
> a question that has no answer. Am I supposed to post Zolak's
> imaginary stats?
Nothing irks me more than throwing a bunch of ascii characters at a
question, which don't shed any light on an answer.
I was looking for opinion, nothing more. I was "curious" especially
with your reference to a "quarterback controversy" and a to
the receivers not getting open and dropping passes when they did get
open. I guess I wanted to explore the idea that somehow Zolak might be
an improvement. (Better mobility for example??)
But you dodge the question and posted random characters instead.
Too bad, because I too think the Big Tuna is overly stubborn, and
should be trying different things to shake up this team.
Try some different RBs. Scramble that offensive line. Give Zolak
the ball and Drew a view from the bench. Do SOMETHING Bill, because
what you got now ain't working...
JimH
|
61.1056 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Mon Nov 07 1994 17:40 | 9 |
|
re 1054
It will take so doing for the Cleveland d to catch Dallas. Prior to
yesterdays ggames the Browns had given up 2628 yards compared to 2104
for the #2 (GreenBay #1) Dallas defense Cleveland was ranked 19th
before yesterday.
|
61.1057 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Cleveland=RECTUM of the World!! | Mon Nov 07 1994 20:42 | 11 |
| They may have the #1 defense as far as "points allowed" goes, but then
AGAIN, you have to consider who they've played. When you play teams
with a combined record that's something like 24 games under .500, so
far, yer gramdmother could play out there and stop em.
As far as the Refs go, after watching the STEELER game, and much of the
'Spots-Patsies debacle, I gotta admit, the refs are throwing way too
many flags, and ones that should never be thrown.
JaKe
|
61.1058 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 07 1994 21:28 | 7 |
61.1059 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Cleveland=RECTUM of the World!! | Mon Nov 07 1994 23:31 | 9 |
| Clevescum shutting out Arizona and the STEELERS losing to Arizona don't
prove sh_t, when it comes to comparing teams.
Different days, different players, different games.
And in regards to Clevescum fans, yer just different.
JaKe
|
61.1060 | | CAMONE::WAY | Take me, subcreature! | Tue Nov 08 1994 08:53 | 7 |
| Yes, Glenn, you are right and I stand corrected. It is Rikpen, er, uh, I
mean Ripken.
I can never keep that straight.....8^)
'Saw
|
61.1061 | Still one of the top 2 defense's | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Nov 08 1994 10:40 | 12 |
| The HIGH number of wins by cleveland is clearly related to there
soft schedule. But the 9 teams theyve played against combined
have scored 1458pts in 9 games. So there opponents score an average
of 18pts per week, so Cleveland holds them all to a TD below average.
I dont have time to figure out everyone's Defense but I still say
Cleveland is the #1 or #2 defense... I dont care if they give up a
long slow drive at the end of the game when its out of reach that
just pads the yards but if they keep them out of the endzone and
make the opposing team take FG then there a GREAT DEFENSE.
|
61.1062 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Tue Nov 08 1994 11:13 | 11 |
|
If they had the #1 or #2 Defense, how could they lose to Denver? I dont
doubt they give up very few point when playing against teams with an
average .300 record. The Browns are in the same boat as last years
Giants. Good record against bad teams.. wait till next year when their
schedule from this years record pits them against the 1st or 2nd place
teams in the league.
With any luck they'll go 3-4 for the remainder of the season and get
knocked out in the wildcard game. With loses to Philly, KC,Dallas and
Pittsburg and beating Houston, Giants and Seattle, finishing 10-6
|
61.1063 | | FRETZ::HEISER | THE BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, THE PATS SIP! | Tue Nov 08 1994 11:50 | 3 |
| If Clevescum played the Cards again, I doubt they would shut them out,
much less win. It took Buddy 5 weeks to figure out who his best QB
was.
|
61.1064 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Nov 08 1994 12:00 | 30 |
|
>> Nothing irks me more than throwing a bunch of ascii characters at a
>> question, which don't shed any light on an answer.
Yeah, well nothing irks me more than the deaths of innocent children
on the violent inner city streets of America but I guess we all have
different priorities.
>> I was looking for opinion, nothing more. I was "curious" especially
>> with your reference to a "quarterback controversy" and a to
>> the receivers not getting open and dropping passes when they did get
>> open.
And I gave you an opinion but you glossed over that. I can't (no
one can) conclusively say that Zolak would have performed better
than Bledsoe. All I can (and did) say is that he could hardly have
done worse. The offense is stagnant and it can't be encouraging
to the team to watch Bledsoe go into his shell at the first hint of
pressure. Whereas Blesoe seems a little reticent these days, Zolak
is cocky and confident whether he'd be that way after nine games
of trying to work with that offense is also open to debate. Bledsoe
doesn't seem to have that innate sense of when and where the pressure
is coming, Zoalk exhibited that when he QB'd the Pats. Bledsoe has
the better arm but not by a huge margin. The one other thing is
what effect will it have on the rest of the team to see the player
dubbed 'The Franchise' benched? Nonetheless, I suspect it will
take an injury to Drew to get Zolak in there.
|
61.1065 | Saint Tommy, I'm not worthy!!!! :-( | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Tue Nov 08 1994 12:27 | 33 |
|
>>> Nothing irks me more than throwing a bunch of ascii characters at a
>>> question, which don't shed any light on an answer.
>
> Yeah, well nothing irks me more than the deaths of innocent children
> on the violent inner city streets of America but I guess we all have
> different priorities.
Thank you for sharing that with us, Saint Tommy. Of course just
disregard that I made my comments within the perspective of Sports
notesfile. Yes, I must be in favor of straping innocent little kids
into cars and driving them into the lake, right? St. Tommy says its
so....
So who is patronizing today???
Lasted week you got all huffy about my use of the word "crap" in a
public forum.
This week you make a indirect attack on my character.
Please spare me any further advice on "Noting Etiquette", it'll be
ignored as coming from somebody who doesn't practice what he
preachs....
>And I gave you an opinion but you glossed over that.
Very good, but the opinion didn't particularly address the issue I
was curious about. Obfuscation....
My last words on the subject....
|
61.1066 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Nov 08 1994 12:42 | 13 |
|
>> This week you make a indirect attack on my character.
I did? Loosen up, Jim and turn on your sarcasm sensors. I was
kidding, man. Geez. I can't help but get the impression from
some of your posts going way back when that you have a personal
animosity towards me. I really don't care. If you didn't address
anything to me, it would not bother me in the least. If you want
to bs about sports that's cool, too. I just don't get all that
worked up about any of this and this is hardly worth any trouble.
|
61.1067 | This place will be a morgue next week | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Wed Nov 09 1994 17:17 | 14 |
|
So whats the line on the Philly game?
Lets see Philly has gained 500+ more yards on Offense NFL #5
Philly has given up 460+ fewer yards on Defense NFL #2
All of this to a tougher schedule .421 to .304
Its been awfully quiet in here so far this week. No predictions from
Hal or Icepork. What gives?
|
61.1068 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Nov 09 1994 18:20 | 12 |
|
Don't be surprised by the Browns this week. I will predict an
upset.
Remember...
YOU CAN'T RUN WITH THE BIG DAWGS UNLESS YOU PUT YOUR ORANGE SNEAKERS
ON!
WOOF!
|
61.1069 | | MKFSA::LONG | Like your freedom? Thank a Vet! | Thu Nov 10 1994 08:50 | 9 |
| >>YOU CAN'T RUN WITH THE BIG DAWGS UNLESS YOU PUT YOUR ORANGE SNEAKERS
>>ON!
Just the thought of seeing a bunch of grown men in orange sneakers
with a milkone in their mouths makes me glad I turned down that
job offer in Cleveland!
billl
|
61.1070 | so who's starting at QB? | HBAHBA::HAAS | And this am the way it goes. | Thu Nov 10 1994 12:39 | 0 |
61.1071 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Nov 10 1994 14:00 | 15 |
|
Camp is closed and Bill won't say who will QB the DAWGS.....
remember....
TO RUN WITH THE BIG DAWGS, YOU HAVE TO TAKE OFF YOUR LEASH!
WOOF!
|
61.1072 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Thu Nov 10 1994 14:08 | 6 |
| >
> TO RUN WITH THE BIG DAWGS, YOU HAVE TO TAKE OFF YOUR LEASH!
>
You wear a leash???????
|
61.1073 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Nov 10 1994 18:22 | 9 |
|
I am a BIG DAWG! I have no leash! I wear my sneakers durring the
playoffs....
You are the one with the leash.....
WOOF!
|
61.1074 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | she's proud to be my Mife | Thu Nov 10 1994 22:30 | 8 |
|
>> I am a BIG DAWG!
That explains the big piles of dung in yer notes, big dawgs leave big
turds, who in turn play fer the Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm).
JaKe
|
61.1075 | Note of the Year? | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Nov 11 1994 08:43 | 9 |
| | I am a BIG DAWG! I have no leash! I wear my sneakers durring the
| playoffs....
| You are the one with the leash.....
| WOOF!
This note is truely a great contribution to ::SPROTS
|
61.1076 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Nov 11 1994 11:43 | 4 |
|
Thank you!
GRRRRRRRRRRRRR...
|
61.1077 | Not a pretty site | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Nov 11 1994 12:02 | 9 |
| > I am a BIG DAWG! I have no leash! I wear my sneakers durring the
> playoffs....
Unfortunately, sneaker be all that Hal wears during playoffs. C'mon
Buddy, get some more clothes on, and maybe your 'Spots can get past my
Broncos. NOT!
zamboni
|
61.1078 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sat Nov 12 1994 09:23 | 9 |
61.1079 | Yeah But Abbot! | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Sat Nov 12 1994 11:49 | 14 |
| Nope,
The Donks haven't won a NFL championship. But have the Browns
won an important game since the inception of the Broncos? Face it,
the Browns demise can be directly traced to the Broncos entry in the
league.
WOOF NOT!
A buddy of mine is making a trip from Mass to Philly to watch the
Browns. I told him not to be disappointed if he spent all that time
and money to watch the 'Spots be splattered live.
zamboni
|
61.1080 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sat Nov 12 1994 17:08 | 12 |
61.1081 | Browns under .500, I don't think so... | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sun Nov 13 1994 18:40 | 18 |
61.1082 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sun Nov 13 1994 18:40 | 5 |
61.1083 | Maybe 2nd place | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Mon Nov 14 1994 07:24 | 32 |
| > Its a tough call, but I would have to vote the #1 all-time choke team
> as
>
>
> The Denver Broncos...
>
> #2 the Minnesota Vikings...
>
> The thing about the Donks is... they have never won and NFL
> championship, and they are probably sub .500 lifetime = MEDIOCRE!
Yeah But,
Think about it. The Browns still can't beat the (in your words) the
"# 1 all-time choke team". That in my book puts them in first place!
Putting aside the necessary manly verbal jousting for a moment.
Browns looked might fine yesterday at the Vet. I'd really thought the
Browns were going to get whupped by the Eagles yesterday. Instead the
'Spots did the whupping. We'll get to see if these Brown are really for
real when they stop in at KC this weekend, then in Dallas on prime time
in early December.
All in all, a nice weekeend for the Browns and their fans this
weekend.
zamboni
DANG! I said something nice about a 'Spot. Quick, turn down the heat,
the zamboni is melting down!
|
61.1084 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 14 1994 07:29 | 6 |
61.1085 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 14 1994 11:28 | 3 |
61.1086 | on the brown wagon | HBAHBA::HAAS | And this am the way it goes. | Mon Nov 14 1994 12:06 | 11 |
| I am hereby offishally on the Brown's Bandwagon. I have become a
believer.
If'n they can win with Mark Rypien they must be fer reel.
And nexted Sunday, they is going to go into Kansas City and whoop that
there Joe Montana fella.
Doing my best Rick Flair, "wwwwwwwwweeeeeeeoooooooooooooooooooh"
TTom
|
61.1087 | Browns are up and down team.... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Mon Nov 14 1994 12:06 | 4 |
| The Browns are a good team but you have to admit the Broncos have OWNED
them the last 5-10 years. I know that Philly is tougher than the
Broncos but why does Cleveland struggle against a team like Denver and
then turn around and whup Philly????
|
61.1088 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 14 1994 21:11 | 6 |
61.1089 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Mon Nov 14 1994 22:40 | 18 |
| re .1085
Groaner, you truly are the southerly facing end of a northbound mule.
Since when is there a JaKewatch when the Brown(spot)s(tm) catch the
Eagles looking past them and get lucky????
Now, if I pulled the normal stunt like you and HAL do once the 'SPots
start losing, and distappeared totally in the middle of the season,
that statement would have some merit. BUT, even when the STEELERS went
5-11, I was in this notesfiel Monday er Tuesday EACH WEEK> SOmething
you and HAL will never be able to claim.
Put a dirty freakin' sock in yer fair weathered mouth and take a
freakin hike.
JaKe
|
61.1090 | SNORT! | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Tue Nov 15 1994 07:22 | 8 |
| JaKe,
Stop it man, you're killing me. I just snorted 3 ounces of tea through
my nose.
Well said.
zamboni
|
61.1091 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Tue Nov 15 1994 09:00 | 8 |
|
>> Stop it man, you're killing me. I just snorted 3 ounces of tea through
>>my nose.
Decaf er regular?????
JaKe
|
61.1092 | | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Tue Nov 15 1994 09:01 | 5 |
| > Decaf er regular?????
Regular. Need the hard stuff in the morning.
zamboni
|
61.1093 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Tue Nov 15 1994 09:05 | 7 |
| 3 ounces should be enuf to keep the sinuses clear fer the day.
Good thing youe weren't eating a bagel when you read that er you could
be on yer way t the hospital right now.
JaKe
|
61.1094 | FOR EVER AND EVER AND EVER AND EVER | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Nov 15 1994 09:10 | 21 |
|
Yes these DAWGS are for real. How can there be any question? But,
we all know there will always be those disbelievers. I would like
to say that there are still questions in my mind though. With
Mark in there at QB I feel good about the Browns chances of getting
to the big game because he won't loose the game for you. With
Vinny as QB, I'm not so confident. So now comes the controversy...
When Vinny is better, will he start over Mark? I say no, don't
start Vinny unless the Browns are down big and they bring him in
durring a game. I honestly don't see any team being as good as the
Browns right now. I really think the DAWGS can match up well
against anyone in the league. I would surely say the DAWGS are #1
in the AFC!!!
Go BROWNS!
Ya gotta love dem DAWGS!
WOOF (YOUR KING)
|
61.1095 | All hail King of the Bow-wows! | MKFSA::LONG | Like your freedom? Thank a Vet! | Tue Nov 15 1994 10:28 | 10 |
| I think every team has gone through this qb controversy at one
time or another. Most coaches seem to stick with a starting qb
and don't hesitate to put him right back in his original role
after recovering from an injury. After watching parts of a couple
of Cleveland games I can see why you would rather have Rypien in
there over Testeverde. IMHO history says Vinnie will be put in
as soon as he's healthy until he proves to the coach his ineptness.
billl
|
61.1096 | We'll see... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Nov 15 1994 11:13 | 4 |
| .1094
The dawgs couldn't even match-up with the Donks!!!! But seriously...
Randall had nothing but praise for the browns defense.
|
61.1097 | (8^)* | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Tue Nov 15 1994 15:55 | 41 |
| WAs helping my daughter do some research this weekend and came up with some
very interesting, but little known information.
She was assigned to do a paper on ecological disasters pertainig to the world's
worst dumps, and she chose Cleveland.
While many think that Cleveland was founded and named after Moses
Cleaveland(who later dropped the a) in about 1796, very few know how the naming
and founding of Cleveland actually came about.
Long before Cleaveland "discovered" the area, there was a tribe of Indians, the
Faucowee Indians, that roamed and laid claim to the area. They controlled most
of the area that is now the state of Ohio. Back then, they considered Buffalo
dung hazardous, and decided to dump it in one area. They named this area
"Cleveland". Faucowee language defined "Cleve" as huge placement of Buffalo
sh_t, and "land" as DUMP.
For the lasted 60 years of the tribe's existance, their chief, Ware Da, also
knkow as "Ware Da, Faucowee", had his warriors scoop up and deposit all of the
dung they came across in a 14 mile section of land near Lake Erie, which is
where Cleveland now is situated. Historians estimate that over 430 billion
cubic yards of Buffalo, cow, and Faucowee dung, along with all of their tribal
trash was dumped within the current city limits, and the leeching of toxicity
from this dumping is the cause for the city having the most people rated as
among the "Walking brain dead."
What has also gone unnoticed is that there was a warrior that started the fight
with the Apache tribe that lead to the Faucowee tribe being wiped out, who
continually taunted the Apache tribe with statements like, "have you Apache
ever won an Indian nation championship???". The warrior was later castrated
and had his removed articles shoved down his throat, causing him to choke to
death. The Faucowee would have had a chance to beat the Apache, but they
lacked "the drive" to do it, and "fumbled" their tomahawks horribly.
Even today, you can go to Cleveland Municipal Stadium and see the affected
"brain Dead" at the lake end of the stadium during football games, and you can
get to the buried dung just by scraping an inch or so below the playing
surface.
|
61.1098 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Tue Nov 15 1994 16:52 | 3 |
| Now that was funny even to the Groaner. Good one jake
Jimbo
|
61.1099 | Too Bad JaKe | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Nov 16 1994 07:24 | 6 |
| I waited to drink my tea this morning. Now I'm not wearing it after
serious nasal decompression.
This note of yours explains a lot about Cleveland and their fans!
t
|
61.1100 | "NO too Heiser!!!! | PTOS01::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Wed Nov 16 1994 09:30 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
61.1101 | Brownie Buggy heads to Kansas City....... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Nov 18 1994 13:27 | 27 |
|
Yes the Browns are getting some respect.......The Browns have made
the USA Todays major articals twice this week and have also moved up
on Joe Gibbs list from #6 to #3 behind #1 49ers and #2 Dallas. The
Browns are also picked to upset Kansas City this weekend. The Brownie
Buggy is getting full since the big win at the Vet last weekend where
the DAWGS embarrassed the Eagles at home. The DAWG Defense is the
biggest reason for the Browns record but lets not overlook the offense
either. Mr. Hoard has played a huge part in this attack along with
Mr. Carrier who has stepped up in place of Michael Jackson since his
injury.
I also like the Browns this weekend against the Chiefs but in
seeing them take care of the Eagles, I see the Browns also beating up
on the Cowboys, Giants, Oilers, Seahawks, Squeelers, not to mention
Miami and San Diego. I like the Browns chances to taking the AFC and
even like their chances of a big win in the Bowl.
So, Bring on the Vikings, the 49ers, or the Cowboys....The Browns
appear to be ready to be called the TEAM OF THE 90'S.
It has honestly surprised me that they have turned things around
so quickly! 3 years wasn't too hard to take..........was it?????
ITS BEEN HELL!!!!
Go DAWGS!
WOOF!
|
61.1102 | Upset? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Fri Nov 18 1994 13:47 | 15 |
| >> <<< Note 61.1101 by SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR "INDIANS CAVS BROWNS" >>>
>> -< Brownie Buggy heads to Kansas City....... >-
>> on Joe Gibbs list from #6 to #3 behind #1 49ers and #2 Dallas. The
>> Browns are also picked to upset Kansas City this weekend. The Brownie
>> Buggy is getting full since the big win at the Vet last weekend where
Let me see if I'm getting this straight. The Browns are number 3 behind
San Francisco and Dallas. They're 8-2, while the Chiefs are 6-4, and
obviously rated lower than number 3.
Why would beating the Chiefs be considered an upset? A team as good
as the Browns should be the favorite.
Jerry
|
61.1103 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Fri Nov 18 1994 14:11 | 6 |
|
> Why would beating the Chiefs be considered an upset?
Because Las Vegas bettors say so.
Joe
|
61.1104 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Fri Nov 18 1994 15:43 | 33 |
|
>>seeing them take care of the Eagles, I see the Browns also beating up
>>on the Cowboys, Giants, Oilers, Seahawks, Squeelers, not to mention
>>Miami and San Diego.
Lessee, here's how the Brown(spot)s(tm) will REALLY do:
.vs. Cowboys lose 38-10(Emmitt Smith and Michael Ervin have
career days)
.vs. Giants win 16-0 (Giants bring back Y.A. Tittle in futile
attempt to find a QB whe can put points on
the board)
.vs. Oilers win 2-0 (who loses to the Oilers anyways)
.vs. SEahawks Lose 14-13 (big upset here)
.vs. STEELERS Lose 9-3 (STEELERS outdefense 'Spots)
.vs. Miami Lose 42-10 (Marino embarasses the Brown(spot)s(tm)
defense)
.vs. San Diego Lose 10-9 (World's most boring game as lack of
offenses show up in both teams)
>> I like the Browns chances to taking the AFC and
>>even like their chances of a big win in the Bowl.
The only win they'll get in any bowl is a toilet bowl, but that's what
they play their home games in anyways, ain't it??
JaKe
|
61.1105 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sat Nov 19 1994 12:12 | 7 |
61.1106 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sat Nov 19 1994 12:13 | 4 |
61.1107 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Sun Nov 20 1994 16:46 | 8 |
| GROANER_WATCH..........GROUND ZERO!!!!!!
Like he ain't got a terminal at home!!!
Loving every minute of it as the Brown(spot)s(tm) fall to KC!!!!
JaKe
|
61.1108 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Sun Nov 20 1994 16:49 | 15 |
|
>>DISCLAIMER I WILL BE OUT UNTIL A WEEK FROM MONDAY. So IF the Browns
>>happen to lose to KC, forget about the iceWATCH garbage...
or I'll
^^^^^^^
>>be unbearable when I come back!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yer unbearable anyways, so what stunt could you pull to get any
worse?????
Groaner Watch Hour 1!!!!
JaKe
|
61.1109 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Sun Nov 20 1994 16:54 | 7 |
| With his idle threat, Groaner show he cain dish it out but defn=initely
cain't take it, just like ANY Clevescum'er!!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!
JaKe
|
61.1110 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Nov 21 1994 00:09 | 7 |
|
And lets see how long it takes HAL to make an appearance. If you are
interested in joining a betting pools on this (no money, of course)
send mail to metsny::francus
The Crazy Met
|
61.1111 | Was out of town, as usual | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Mon Nov 21 1994 08:03 | 11 |
| Just saw the results of JaKe's daughter's historical and archaeological
researches. Excellent stuff. I've only been in Cleveland once, way
back in 1965, but that certainly explains a great deal.
And did you notice the most astonishing thing about it? It was entirely
in English!! JaKe, did your daughter write it for you?
And finally, am I wrong, or does it sound like JaKe is going into serious
Groaner-withdrawal?
Steve
|
61.1112 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Lets Go Hoyas | Mon Nov 21 1994 08:22 | 4 |
|
Hal watch hour 1...
|
61.1113 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Nov 21 1994 08:56 | 13 |
|
> GROANER_WATCH..........GROUND ZERO!!!!!!
> Like he ain't got a terminal at home!!!
He does - I don't think he's got one in Cleveland, though...
> Loving every minute of it as the Browns fall to KC!!!!
Well, I'm glad the Browns were able to provide you with such
enjoyment. Personally, I was rather glad I didn't have to watch.
Joe
|
61.1114 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Nov 21 1994 09:03 | 9 |
|
Looks like the Browns lost a game they should have won by the clips
I saw yesterday.....fumble on the 4 yard line.....fumble near the end
of the game with the Browns driving.....then, what is the deal with all
the penalties??? Bottom line is .... we need a quarterback. Must have
been a good game to watch though.
WOOF!
|
61.1115 | hat tricked | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Nov 21 1994 10:40 | 9 |
| I'll take the credit for thised loss..
Firsted of all, I jumped on the Cleveburgh bandwagon. Then I signed me up
a Brown Dawg, Leroy Hoard, for FFL. Then, the coupe de grass, I started
the guy.
Nice fumble there, Leroy...
TTom
|
61.1116 | Tradition? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Mon Nov 21 1994 10:52 | 11 |
| >> <<< Note 61.1115 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>
>> -< hat tricked >-
>>Nice fumble there, Leroy...
I didn't see the game, but someone said something about a fumble on
the 4 yard line. So, did a Cleveland running back fumble close to
the goal line?
I thought that was a tradition in Cleveland.
|
61.1117 | stuck inside of Cleveburgh with the Modell blues agin | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Nov 21 1994 11:01 | 8 |
| Byner never had a chance to relive his former glory. Leroy upheld the
tradition in fine fashion, however.
One of the better outcomes of all this is the trouble in Paradise with
Belichik, Vinnie and Rypien. Some QB controversy, there. Nobody wanted
any of 'em and now they is all stuck together.
TTom
|
61.1118 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Nov 21 1994 11:15 | 6 |
|
It was Rypien who fumbled twice...once on the 4 and the other on
the last drive. The other fumble and INT, I don't know who was to
blame. After the big game last week, I guess this was expected.
WOOF
|
61.1119 | Congrats to the Steelers for taking the AFC LEAD | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 21 1994 13:27 | 14 |
| Yes CLeveland has finally lost there AFC Central lead to the Steelers
but it may be a short term stay at #1 for Pittsburg but for New Pitt
is the AFC Leader and if the season were to end today THEY WOULD HAVE
HFA THROUGHOUT THE PLAYOFFS... How about that...
but this week we see Clevland at home hosting Houston, yes the 1-9
houston oilers who are managing a whopping 13 pts per game. On the
other end Pittsburg has to travle to LA and face the Raiders, after
a slow start the Raiders find themselves back in the hunt at 6-5 and
cant afford to lose to pitt... Will be a close one. 7 games this week
have 2 teams facing off that are fighting for the Playoffs... 5 weeks
left who will rise to the top.
mab
|
61.1120 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Nov 21 1994 14:32 | 4 |
| Houston is so bad that, in our FFL league no one even plays Slaughter,
Jefferies, or Givens anymore....
Jimbo
|
61.1121 | maybe | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Nov 21 1994 14:51 | 9 |
| I've got Gary Brown on my team and like the real Oilers, Brown has taken
a seat on the pine.
Supposedly, Lorenzo White is the RB Main, at least for now.
I'm looking for Houston to show us something as they "celebrate" their
new coach and the Giants continue their decline.
TTom
|
61.1122 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Nov 21 1994 14:54 | 3 |
| Groaner-watch, Day 1.
Mark.
|
61.1123 | He's doing pretty darn good too | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 21 1994 15:07 | 2 |
| I had slaughter and dropped him in favor of the Rookie Darney Scott
from Cinncy...
|
61.1124 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Tue Nov 22 1994 00:48 | 10 |
|
G R O A N E R _ W A T C H
D A Y 2
JaKe
|
61.1125 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Tue Nov 22 1994 11:58 | 7 |
| GROANER_WATCH STARDATE 2.5
ANd he's probably working, just lying to us that he was going to be
out, just to scart to show his face in here!!!
JaKe
|
61.1126 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Nov 22 1994 12:01 | 1 |
| I think he is gone. He posted this week's rotis roster last Friday.
|
61.1127 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Lets Go Hoyas | Tue Nov 22 1994 12:03 | 3 |
|
see 61.1106
|
61.1128 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Nov 22 1994 13:36 | 6 |
| re: .1106
that line about being insufferable is a real hoot considering that Groaner
would be insufferable no matter what.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1129 | Turkey on your mind??????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Lets Go Hoyas | Tue Nov 22 1994 14:06 | 5 |
|
Insufferable??
Read it again TCW!
|
61.1130 | besides I don't like turkey | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Nov 22 1994 14:31 | 3 |
| ok, unbearable, same difference
The Crazy Met
|
61.1131 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Tue Nov 22 1994 14:39 | 6 |
| Unbearable, usufferable, being a total a$$hole.
All would be an improvement fer him.
JaKe
|
61.1132 | Pains me to say this... But He is king... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Nov 23 1994 09:16 | 25 |
| Ok we've all had to put up with some very UNVEARABLE, UNSUFFERABLE
Cleveland fans over the years.. These fans claim they have the
best Basketball, Football, Baseball and Hockey Players :-) and when
there teams fall short (Which is all of the time) they make GREAT
excuse's and remind us that they still have the World Champion
Nose Rods who won the Nickle Pushing up a ramp championship the last
11 years straight...
But these fans are consistent and for the past 6 years hal has more
then likly been picking the Browns every week in the KOH contest with
not so great results.. But this year him Picking the Browns each week
earned him WIN's and he outright WON the KOH, now was it Football
knowledge, we'll judging from his 2-10 in the pool I'd say no.. But
sometimes consistency pays off, and even though it pains me.. HE IS
THE KING and should get his crown... Id like to think all of us can
be obnoxious at times, of course keeping up with cleveland fans would
be tough...
But I bow to the New King, he won it fair and square and should be
recognized for his greatness...
Of course when his browns get trampled in the WC game we can all come
in here and razz him... But he'll still be king...
mab
|
61.1133 | | 56953::HALPIN | The Browns SIP!!! The Pats are AWESOME!!!!!! | Wed Nov 23 1994 09:37 | 13 |
|
>Ok we've all had to put up with some very UNVEARABLE, UNSUFFERABLE
>Cleveland fans over the years.. These fans claim they have the
>best Basketball, Football, Baseball and Hockey Players :-)
You forgot their claim to the best minor league soccer players
in the world, also... What were they, the Nestle Crunchies or something
like that???
JimH :-)
|
61.1134 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Wed Nov 23 1994 09:51 | 16 |
|
> You forgot their claim to the best minor league soccer players
> in the world, also... What were they, the Nestle Crunchies or something
> like that???
Cleveland Crunch. Not minor league soccer, either (well, OK, I
guess it depends - if you consider European basketball minor
league basketball, then yes. I guess I tend to consider them
seperate entities, with the CBA being minor league basketball
and the European leagues being "major league", within their own
country).
BTW, if you enjoy indoor soccer, they're showing a fair amount of
it on ESPN2...
Joe
|
61.1135 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sun Nov 27 1994 12:39 | 38 |
61.1136 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Nov 27 1994 14:29 | 7 |
|
We in ::sprotsland have deatl with MrT and Groaner you are no
MrT; dream on guy. Good to see you finally showed up a week after the
Browns lost.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1137 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sun Nov 27 1994 14:51 | 4 |
61.1138 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sun Nov 27 1994 14:51 | 4 |
61.1139 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Dawgs RULE, Pats SIP! | Sun Nov 27 1994 17:12 | 3 |
61.1140 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Sun Nov 27 1994 23:09 | 10 |
|
>>Dawgs pound Oilers... take sole possession of first place at 9-3.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Boy, weren't that part of the statement short lived??? 'Spots are now
"tied" fer first, although the SUPERIOr STEELERS hold the tiebreaker
over the Mistakes by the Lake.
JaKe
|
61.1141 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Sun Nov 27 1994 23:12 | 18 |
|
>>3. I clearly stated that I was out of town last week without access to
>>a terminal. This week, regardless of whether the Browns win or not, it
>>will be payback time for starting with the iceWATCH! WARNING, it may
>>just be better to stay out of SPORTS and set seen at the end of the
>>week - the alternative is to wear out your next unseen button.
Lessee, we see a note from Groaner, we hit nexted unseen,
BUSINESS AS USUAL, so what's new???
RE Celtics: Lessee Groaner, they DID win an NBA Championship er two or
thre in RECENT HISTORY, unlike yer Brown(spot)s(tm) who ain't won sh_t
in 30+ years, and ain't come close to a Super Bowl.
JaKe
|
61.1142 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Nov 27 1994 23:22 | 9 |
| Wasn't it Groaner that was doing a JaKe watch when he was told over and
over again that JaKester worked second shift? nah, couldn't be for
Groaner is an honorable man (but then again so was Brutus) - but I
wonder if Groaner has enough of an education to understand the
reference, probably not.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1143 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 09:04 | 3 |
61.1144 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 10:58 | 2 |
61.1145 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:02 | 3 |
|
Technically the brownspots are in 2nd since Steelers have better division
record!
|
61.1146 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:23 | 5 |
| re: .1145
Don't let reality cloud your statements! :-) Groaner certainly won't
The Crazy Met
|
61.1147 | | PTOS01::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm DTN: 422-7253 | Mon Nov 28 1994 12:05 | 13 |
| >>Other than Basketball has New England (sure, Cleveland stands on its
>> own as a city, the Pats represent 6 freaking states and they still
>> couldn't win on an instant lottery ticket!) ever had a championship
>> team in a major sport?
>> Hockey... give me a break... hockey is about as major in the US as
>> Candlepin bowling. NO MAJOR NETWORK TV CONTRACT! Cable doesn't
>> count, and hopefully the NHL will fold as a result of this strike.
When Cleveland won their latest major championship, did that sport have a
major network TV contract? was TV even invented?
|
61.1148 | Hockey in the most popular sport in the NE live with it | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Mon Nov 28 1994 12:06 | 8 |
|
Paul...
Is Fox a cable channel? What about ABC last two years. Come on
man crawl out from under that sludge.
j/
|
61.1149 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Nov 28 1994 12:19 | 10 |
|
> When Cleveland won their latest major championship, did that sport have a
> major network TV contract? was TV even invented?
Hmmm... the Browns last won in '64, the Tribe in '48. TV (and network
TV for that matter) was around well before that (OK, network TV and
the Tribe's last WS were not far off in time). As to a major network
contract, I have no idea...
Joe
|
61.1150 | | MKFSA::LONG | Hey N.E., Keep RIGHT except to pass!!! | Mon Nov 28 1994 12:21 | 5 |
| Joe, you musta lost that bet REAL bad to 'still' be saddled with that
p-name you're sportin'
billl
|
61.1151 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Nov 28 1994 12:28 | 7 |
|
Nah, I just decided that I liked it so much (and it's such a ridiculous
statement this season, though I suppose less ridiculous now than it was
when I earned it), that I'd keep it, at least until something better
comes along...
Joe
|
61.1152 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 12:51 | 4 |
61.1153 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Nov 28 1994 13:49 | 2 |
| How many Super Bowls have the Skidmarks(tm) been in? Even the Pats
have been in 1!
|
61.1154 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 13:52 | 3 |
61.1155 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 14:33 | 3 |
61.1156 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Mon Nov 28 1994 14:36 | 2 |
|
,and take Icepork with you
|
61.1157 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 28 1994 15:04 | 3 |
61.1158 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Mon Nov 28 1994 15:22 | 9 |
|
>>Did anyone catch the Browns game yesterday, they sure looked good.
My dead grandmother would look good .vs. the Oilscum.
Big Freakin' deal
JaKe
|
61.1159 | ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Nov 28 1994 15:24 | 5 |
|
I guess your dead grandmother's got something on the Giants then....
mike
|
61.1160 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Nov 28 1994 17:37 | 5 |
| and those mighty Steelers didn't look real good against the Oilers,
either.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1161 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Mon Nov 28 1994 17:52 | 28 |
|
>> <<< Note 61.1160 by 57045::FRANCUS "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>>and those mighty Steelers didn't look real good against the Oilers,
>>either.
>>The Crazy Met
Lessee, the Spots beat the Oilscum this year, 34-10 yesterday, and a
paltry 11-8 in the firsted game.
The STEELERS beat the Oilscum 30-14 in week 5, and 12-9 in week 10.
Looks like both teams had a good game and a bad game against the
Oilscum.
Sure, if the STEELERS had any semblance of an offense, they'd be 10-2
or maybe even 12-1 right now, but they're not, they're 9-3 and in the
drivers seat right now.
Groaner ain't got no room talking about who's playing fer the STEELERS
at QB, what with the 'Spots needing a Tampa Bay reject to have a chance
at winning.
JaKe
|
61.1162 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Nov 28 1994 20:16 | 4 |
| when do the Steelers and Browns play? I expect to see a p_name wager on
it.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1163 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Mon Nov 28 1994 20:59 | 6 |
| Sunday, December 18th, 1pm.
I'll risk my p_name on the game.
JaKe
|
61.1164 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Nov 29 1994 08:07 | 4 |
61.1165 | Boston Sports RULE | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 01 1994 15:15 | 22 |
| Well I know we can go back and say from 1784-1803 The Cleveland Hogs
won 6 Log cutting championships..
But if compare all of the Big-4 to Big-4 sports of Cleveland with
Boston (Face it the Patriots are a boston team) boston has had superior
teams in every sport. Pats went to the SB in 85, Celtics won a few in
the 80's, RedSox's were in there in the 80's as were the Bruins.. They
may not have won them but there were in there. When was the last time
ANY CLEVELAND MAJOR TEAM was even in the Championship game ???
Every year it seems like at least one of the Boston teams are in it
(Downslide in the 90's) but they keep it intresting and competative.
The Browns are having a good year but if you look at the Browns and
Pats the Pats are in much better shape, I really dont see the browns
winning it in the next 3-5 years. They will more then likely get worse
before they get better, where as the pats are at least exciting to
watch and have that good ol Potential Factor :-)
Hope The Dawgs keep there Guard up, the Giants have won 2 in a row :-)
mab
|
61.1166 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 01 1994 17:10 | 18 |
61.1167 | Boston has no complaint s | 25022::BREEN | Reigns, Or so the sages speak. | Thu Dec 01 1994 17:11 | 15 |
| The bruins have a worthless record which I will note anyway:
Most consecutive playoff appearances 1968-present (From Orr's
second season)
Redsox had 20+ .500 or greater seasons from 1967 on till '92(?)
5 division or pennant flags, a playoff, twice 1 game out (72,81), and
in contention late in 73,74,77,79,91
Celtics are in their first long term decline (>5 years with no
championship).
"Hapless" Patriots actually were competitive from mid seventies to
late 80s with half dozen or so playoff appearances, '86 and nearly
always in playoff contention. If you take the post merger era of nfl
I'd think Browns and Patriots would have very similar records.
|
61.1168 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Dec 01 1994 17:38 | 6 |
| > The Boston teams in the 80's were more successful in the NBA and MLB,
> but not in the NFL.
The Pats made it to the Super Bowl in the '85-'86 season and were in
the playoffs a few years afterwards. The SB appearance is 1 more than
the Browns have.
|
61.1169 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 01 1994 22:57 | 39 |
61.1170 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 01 1994 22:58 | 4 |
61.1171 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 02 1994 08:29 | 7 |
61.1172 | Jordan's Sacrificial Cadavers | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Dec 02 1994 11:01 | 2 |
| How many NBA championship series have the Cadavers played in? Probably
the same number of Super Bowls that SkidMarks have been in.
|
61.1173 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 02 1994 11:09 | 25 |
61.1174 | I never heard that | BSS::MENDEZ | | Fri Dec 02 1994 11:26 | 2 |
| It wold have been tragic if the CELTICS season ended that way...
|
61.1175 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Dec 02 1994 11:32 | 7 |
| > How many NBA championships have the Suns won?
0. But they've won 2 more conference championships than the Cadavers.
You know the Celtics record well enough to know you can't debate it.
If Cleveland keeps this up, they'll get demoted to the CBA where they
belong.
|
61.1176 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Fri Dec 02 1994 12:08 | 33 |
|
> If Cleveland keeps this up, they'll get demoted to the CBA where they
> belong.
Huh? The Cavs certainly have not been a model franchise (the mere
existence of Ted Stepien should tell you that), but they certainly
have had their moments. Other than the Stepien years (and a couple
of recovery years afterwards, the team has been fairly good.
Since SPORTS seems to be a what-have-you-done-for-me-lately crowd,
compare the last 5 years. The Cavs certainly haven't been the best
team, but they've accomplished more than...
1) Orlando
2) New Jersey
3) Miami
4) Washington
5) Boston
6) Philly
7) Charlotte
8) Atlanta
9) Milwaukee
10) Denver
11) Dallas
12) Minnesota
13) Seattle
14) Golden State
15) Sacramento
16) LA Clippers
...all of which doesn't add up to a championship, but it does leave
them quite a few steps above the CBA...
Joe
|
61.1177 | Ugly | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 02 1994 12:22 | 3 |
| But, Joe, them uniforms has gots to go...
TTom
|
61.1178 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Fri Dec 02 1994 13:05 | 10 |
|
> But, Joe, them uniforms has gots to go...
No argument there.
Mark Price's diplomatic comment when he first saw the new uniforms:
'Well, they're different...'
Joe
|
61.1179 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 02 1994 13:13 | 37 |
61.1180 | Go ACCer! | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 02 1994 13:13 | 5 |
| Mark Price is really carrying this team. Lasted night's replays looked
like he got into one of his zones and three-pointed the Cavs to the win
at Milwaukee.
TTOm
|
61.1181 | Cleveland and Boston often crossed paths | 25022::BREEN | But in the land of the One-eyed Men | Fri Dec 02 1994 13:27 | 19 |
| Well with a big victory lead from 1970 thru 1975 and an overall win
difference of 3 the Pat's certainly had an edge on Browns from
"mid-seventies to end of 80s". Pats misfortunes from last year of
Fluite to present need no elaboration.
Now the Indians were the one of the top teams in baseball in the 40s
and 50s with perhaps the best pitching in the history of the game.
Unfortunately the Yankees were overloaded during that period and the
tribe needed 111 wins to salvage one pennant and a Joe McCarthy brain
aneurism (Denny who) to capture there last world series.
Ironically two of the best Cavalier teams in '76 and 84(ish) were
derailed by the Celtics. The second on a George Karl mental error.
And it was the Cleveland WHA club that stole Gerry Cheevers away from
Bruins putting a stop to that dynasty.
In 1954 Cleveland beat Boston 20 of 22 times, the Sox split with the
Yankees. There was the pennant.
|
61.1182 | Groaner's Rules for Clevelander Behavior | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Dec 02 1994 14:13 | 20 |
| 1. Try to belittle an opponents team by accusing them of not winning a
championship even though your own team hasn't won one either.
2. If you're from the Boston area, accuse them of living in the past
when they reference their championships, but it is okay for you to
mention ancient Cleveland championships that aren't even competed
for today and haven't been for over 30 years.
3. If your team has not won any championships, go to Rule 1.
4. In regards to Rule 3, if the team is from Cleveland this is all the
more reason to use it.
5. Since Cleveland hasn't even won, placed, or shown in any of the sports
under debate, bring in irrelevant data like geographic locations
whether the opponent supports the team from their home state or the
state they currently live in. Remember facts aren't important.
6. If all else fails, fill the conference with junk notes and waste
diskspace until they writelock it or disband it, and promote a king who
goes 2-12 in NFL pools with yet even more junk notes, despite rational
pleas from the host to act like an adult.
7. Given rule 6, if successful in shutting down the conference, you will
no longer have to defend your sorry-assed teams to informed sports fans
with a brain to know better.
|
61.1183 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 02 1994 15:10 | 6 |
61.1184 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 02 1994 15:44 | 26 |
|
>>I guesss now that the Browns are ranked #3 in defense in the AFC (using
>>the meaningless method - yards given up),
STEELERS are ranked #3 in the NFL, FWIW.
>>still #1 in points yielded by
>>far, the anti-Browns clowns will have to come up with some other stuff
>>to dump on.
So they've held the pathetic offenses to 24 points less than their
closest follower, the STEELERS, although after a rough start, the
STEELERS are playing better defense than the Brown(spot)s(tm) and in
the lasted 8 weeks, they've held opponents to mucho less points than
the Spots over the same period.
I'd be willing to bet that if you ask 100 people to choose between the
STEELER defense and the 'Spots defense on who they'd rather have, right
now the STEELERS would probably win about 75 to 25.
The 'Spots will finish, at best 11-5, maybe even 10-6, and will fall in
game 15 to the STEELERS.
JaKe
|
61.1185 | restatement | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 02 1994 15:54 | 11 |
| > 1. Try to belittle an opponents team by accusing them of not winning a
> championship even though your own team hasn't won one either.
Oops. Sorry to bring in facks to otherwise stimulating discussion but
them there Dawgs most certainly have won championships. In couple of
leagues. I guess you mean to equate winning the Super Bowl, which now
settles the NFL, with winning the NBA Championship.
But I still say the Suns have a lot better uniforms than the Cavs...
TTom
|
61.1186 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Dec 02 1994 16:06 | 7 |
| > 2. If you're from the Boston area, accuse them of living in the past
> when they reference their championships, but it is okay for you to
> mention ancient Cleveland championships that aren't even competed
> for today and haven't been for over 30 years.
TTom, you forgot rule 2. The only NFL championship people care about
is called the Super Bowl.
|
61.1187 | changes are the same | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 02 1994 16:12 | 16 |
| re: Boston area.
Hail, I dont know who lives where. There's a lot of people in ::SPROTS
who root for teams in cities other than where they live.
I should, however, mention that Cleveland not only has won championships
but that they have a history of championships, albeit afore the super
bowl.
About the fixation on the Super Bowl, I guess we'll have to wait until
there's the Super Series in NBA and then ask them Celtics fans if'n they
ever won one...
We won't have to be asking this of Phoenix, in any case. ;-)
TTom
|
61.1188 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 02 1994 16:25 | 9 |
| Groaner,
given a choice between yer "rules" and TTom's, TTom's is as correct in
describing yer ways as it cain get, whilst yers is inane BS, but then
again, so are 99.99999999999931825(scientific study has been done) of
your entries in here.
JaKe
|
61.1189 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 02 1994 16:35 | 5 |
61.1190 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 02 1994 20:06 | 10 |
| Okay, so it was Heiser, and put yer condescending air you got about you
in the freakin' trash. Like you never make a mistake??? Oh yeah, you
make one every day rooting fer the 'Spots.
Hope ya fall off a bridge
Have a crappy weekend Groaner
JaKe
|
61.1191 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Dec 04 1994 19:21 | 13 |
61.1192 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Dec 04 1994 19:23 | 6 |
61.1193 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Sun Dec 04 1994 20:18 | 2 |
| HAL watch, day 1
|
61.1194 | 'Spots in a free fall. | PTOS01::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Sun Dec 04 1994 22:17 | 16 |
| The Brown(spts)s(tm) fell back to earth and played the best game they
were capable of against the NFC East powerhouse Giants.
'Spots will finish NO BETTER than 10-6, while the STEELERS will finish
no worse than 12-4.
Ya heerd it here firsted.
GROANER_WATCH MOnth 1, HAL Watch Day 1.
Now, who had the nuts to log into Groaner's account and enter a note
today??? I know it wasn't Groaner, cause when his team goes into the
tank, he dissappears REAL fast.
JaKe
|
61.1195 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | STEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAM | Mon Dec 05 1994 07:59 | 7 |
|
Vinnie makes Neil Odonnell look like Bart Starr!!!
Chap
|
61.1196 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 08:28 | 7 |
61.1197 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 08:28 | 3 |
61.1198 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 08:35 | 9 |
61.1199 | just another meaningless stat | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 05 1994 08:35 | 9 |
|
well I saw the same trivia question and the answer would be the Brownies
but most of those playoff appearences where before they join the AFC so
I don't think they should count for them as the AFC with the most in
which case I'd have to go with the Raiders..........
and of course the all-time leaders is the Giants.........
mike
|
61.1200 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 08:37 | 5 |
61.1201 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | STEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAM | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:03 | 7 |
|
So that means the Raiders is the Answer right?
Chap
|
61.1202 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:03 | 10 |
| Boy, did Vinnie look bad yesterday or what?
Browns should have won -- Dan Reeves gave them enough chances to slam the
door on the hapless Giants.
Still, it was nice to see all the folks who are seriously in need of
a life (they sit just behind the end zone there) get all disappointed.
'Saw
|
61.1203 | That will be Hal's excuse | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | STEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAM | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:22 | 9 |
|
And BTW that was a fumble late in the 4th that the refs had ruled
the Giant Receiver down!
Chap
|
61.1204 | depends upon your point of view | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:25 | 4 |
|
but the Giants stayed in the NFC which is the old NFL so they count....
;^)
|
61.1205 | another jake in the making | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:37 | 3 |
61.1206 | | ROCK::HUBER | The Broncos are the BEST team in the NFL! | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:42 | 14 |
|
> The Browns fell back to earth and played the best game they
> were capable of against the NFC East powerhouse Giants.
B^)
Good one, JaKe.
The Browns played perhaps the worst game they were capable of
playing, at least on offense. Not that it was that much worse
than their standard game, save in frequency of turnovers, but
still...
Joe
|
61.1207 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Dec 05 1994 09:53 | 4 |
|
Meanwhile...
The Browns get a reality smack.
|
61.1208 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:01 | 5 |
61.1209 | Haven't been so ill since Bubby's mum left town... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:25 | 14 |
|
> Because the people in Cleveland love football, they are "in serious
> need of a life"? Give me a break.
Myself, I had absolutely no problems with FOX (the sexy network that
aims to please) giving us a eyeful of (and a shattered eardrum from)
one of those stunning Cleveland beauties Groaner's boasted of in the
past, in all her stately dignity. In the words of the poet Hal,
arf, arf!
As for the game, yes, yes, YES!
glenn
|
61.1210 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:27 | 25 |
| > Because the people in Cleveland love football, they are "in serious
> need of a life"? Give me a break.
What would you like? A broken arm, a broken jaw? 8^) 8^) 8^) (a little
rugby humor there).
No, they're in need of a life because they're like those folks who sit
at home and watch Country Line Dancing on TNN, or those folks who sit and
watch QVC day in and day out, or those folks who love to watch Elvis
impersonators....
I love the Giants, and I'll wear my Giants jacket, but I don't think I'd
ever go paint my face, bark like a dog, and in general act like I need
a life, over a football game....
And whoa, did you see the heiffer they showed who was screaming after
Leroy Hoarde made that nice (and it was nice) TD run? Whoa -- is that
what the wimmin are like in Cleveland? She made the Washington Hoggettes
look bee-yoo-tee-ful!
'Saw
|
61.1211 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:30 | 16 |
| What did you folks think of Jerry Glanville?
Personally, I never thought I'd see the man do something worse than he
does when he drives a NASCAR stock car. But yesterday I got a chance to
hear him call color.
Whoa, does he suck enough or what?
Jerry, in case you don't know, the Cleveland QB's name was Vinnie Testaverde.
And Jerry, in case you don't know, you don't need to yell so much.
Can he really be on one of their top tandems??????
|
61.1212 | Didn't watch yesterday, however. | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:34 | 5 |
| | What did you folks think of Jerry Glanville?
"The Worst". He wrests the title from Joe Namath.
Makes me want to wear black whgen I listen to him.
|
61.1213 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | STEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAM | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:34 | 7 |
|
That is about the 4th time I heard Glanville doing games this year
and I swear he gets worse and worse every week
Chap
|
61.1214 | Go Leroy! Watta FFL Player! | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:48 | 12 |
| Down here abouts, we were spared watching and listening to the, uh, gem.
Suffice it to say, my main, Leroy Hoard scored a TD for the Doovers.
'Nuff said.
Cleveland picked a bad game to choke on. They go to Dallas (ouch!) and
then to Pittsburgh. You don't think there'll be any huffing and puffing
about that game in here, do you?
Then there's the lasted mop up, with Seattle visiting.
TTom
|
61.1215 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:49 | 5 |
|
I like him myself. He's not boring or over technical. He could be a bit
less excited but he does provide some insight that other don't.
mike
|
61.1216 | And the sound of his voice is annoying too!!!! | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 05 1994 10:49 | 16 |
|
Yup, Glaanville s*cks. I love it when he calls for a reply to show
how so-and-so did something in the previous play and then the replay
show the guys doing something completely different.
One that I recall from last night was a tipped-pass by a defensive
end. Jerry works the tele-strator to show us how this guy faked the
blitz, and then drifted out into the flat for pass coverage. Replay
shows the DE blitzing, and jumping up in the QBs face to tip the pass!
Thank you for that expert analysis Jerry!!! :-)
JimH
|
61.1217 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:19 | 17 |
61.1218 | I THOUGHT YOU COULD | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | STEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAM | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:33 | 4 |
|
CAN YOU SAY 9-7????
|
61.1219 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:38 | 14 |
| Sawmain,
Them peoples don't paint there faces or wear masks that sit in them end
zone seats. Them peoples(term used loosely) are the mutants that have
been produced by the toxicity of the Clevescum area, and the 'Spots
give them cheap seats cause they're IQ's are so low, the only thang
they cain do is bark.
BTW, the heiffer ya saw is this year's "Miss/Mr. Cleveland".
A 10 to a CLevescumite is a "1" in Pittsburgh.
JaKe
|
61.1220 | 10 wins, wild card | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:40 | 12 |
| Now if'n they lose to Seattle we have a real choke job.
Naw, worst for Cleveland is 10-6.
Let's assume for purposes of this discussion that the Cowboys beat the
Browsn. That would be 9-5. The way the Eagles are playing, the Steelers
should beat 'em. That would be 11-3. At that point, the best the Browns
can hopefor is a tie-breaker if'n they beat the Steelers.
Pittsburgh closes at San Diego, certainly a team to reckon with.
TTom
|
61.1221 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 05 1994 12:33 | 13 |
| I'm laughin so hard after Jake's last reply, it'ss hard too type in this
reply.
> Meanwhile...
> The Browns get a reality smack.
Yep, and next week, ageenst the 'Boys, it's likely to be a nukelear
exposion instead of a smack. I just hope the 'Spots have something left when
they come Pittsburgh, I don't want the Humane Society trying to call off
the game cuz of creulty to the Dawgs.
Keith
|
61.1222 | Love them Y.A. Tittle unis! | MKFSA::LONG | | Mon Dec 05 1994 12:58 | 5 |
| I sure hope Groaner and Hal get their ankles taped so's they
don't twist an ankle jumping OFF the Brownswagon.
billl
|
61.1223 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:00 | 3 |
| | Title: Love them Y.A. Tittle unis!
Ditto!
|
61.1224 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:08 | 7 |
|
Where is the Seattle/Browns game at the end of the year being
played? Could be interesting if its in Seattle (Late Game). The
Browns would then no what other teams have done. If they have to
win, the extra pressure could make them choke.
Ron
|
61.1225 | at the Dawg Pound | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:21 | 6 |
| The games in Cleveland.
The Browns don't need any extra pressure to choke. See yesterday's
performance.
TTom
|
61.1226 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:34 | 7 |
| RE: DawgPound...
I like the 500 pound guy in the endzone with the dog mask on.
FOX surveys revealed that women find him very sexy, hence the increased
exposure.
/Don
|
61.1227 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:41 | 4 |
61.1228 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 13:43 | 7 |
61.1229 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Dec 05 1994 14:01 | 17 |
| > Gee, I thought JAKE worked third shift and didn't have a terminal at
> home, but somehow he gets logged on after a Browns loss.
No.
Jake works SECOND shift, and has a laptop at home, but sometimes, as is
the case with most of our stuff it seems lately, his laptop goes on the
blink.
(We've had lots o' hardware problems in here of late....)
'Saw
|
61.1230 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 14:03 | 3 |
61.1231 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Dec 05 1994 14:11 | 5 |
| > Oh, so my terminal didn't work is a valid excuse... i'll file that for
> future use.
Whatever floats yer boat.....
|
61.1232 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:18 | 8 |
| Groaner, at least when my laptop din't work, I got word to someone and
they put a note in for me. So, if you do that, it's a valid excuse.
BTW, since when am I REQUIRED to make an entry in here before 3:30,
start of my shift, eh???
JaKe
|
61.1233 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:20 | 14 |
|
>> I like the 500 pound guy in the endzone with the dog mask on.
Slasher, see my earlier note, that was not a mask, I REPEAT, not a
mask. In addidtion to the toxicity of the Clevescum area, there have
been some other reported "going's on" that have resulted in grown
beings, with human(again, term used loosely) bodies and the faces of
dogs. These things are native to the northeastern Ohio area and are
not found anywhere else outside of there.
Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
JaKe
|
61.1234 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:30 | 13 |
61.1235 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:32 | 12 |
|
>> root for: Browns #1, Steelers #2
>>It will be highly satisfying when a central division team makes it to
>>the super bowl this year.
I'm going to frame this, Groaner admitting he'll root fer the STEELERS
this year in the SUPER BOWL.
JaKe
|
61.1236 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:34 | 4 |
|
Bandwagon Jumper!!!!!!!
|
61.1237 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:42 | 3 |
| Groaner's a closet Steeler fan.
Keith
|
61.1238 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:48 | 6 |
61.1239 | you should be ashamed | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Dec 05 1994 16:15 | 2 |
| After .1234, you just withdrew your right to call or accuse ANYONE of
being a bandwagon jumper.
|
61.1240 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Mon Dec 05 1994 20:15 | 3 |
| -< Just say no to KING Hal >-
Ain't hard to do if he isn't man (or dawg) enough to show up.
|
61.1241 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Dec 05 1994 23:56 | 4 |
| Hal Watch - dawning of Day 2.
The Crazy Met
al
|
61.1242 | | MKFSA::LONG | | Tue Dec 06 1994 10:29 | 5 |
| I sure hope the local drug stores stock up on that heavy duty
tape for yer ankles, Groaner. Yer gonna need it.
billl
|
61.1243 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 06 1994 16:27 | 5 |
| Oh where, oh where has our little HAL gone, oh where oh where cain he
be????
JaKe
|
61.1244 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 06 1994 16:28 | 4 |
61.1245 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 06 1994 16:30 | 1 |
| Has anyone ever seen Hal and Groaner together?
|
61.1246 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 06 1994 16:30 | 2 |
61.1247 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 06 1994 16:44 | 10 |
|
>>Hal is at home, his PC is broken (excuse #19).
Right, and the check's in the mail, too.
HAL's doing his usual the 'Spots lose and he distappears trick.
JaKe
|
61.1248 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 06 1994 16:48 | 1 |
| Groaner, you behave or I'm gonna sick Killer on you.
|
61.1249 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 06 1994 17:24 | 3 |
61.1250 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 06 1994 17:29 | 2 |
| Groaner, finally congrats for finally coming clean and admitting your
the frontrunner instead of your usual petty reverse KOD mode.
|
61.1251 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Dec 06 1994 18:12 | 4 |
| OK, this Hal_Watch stuff has gome on long enuf. The King hasn't shown
up in a long time. I say we strip him of his title and his crown.
Keith
|
61.1252 | SQUEELERS WILL GO DOWN! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Dec 06 1994 19:01 | 40 |
|
Everyone has a bad day................you just have to.......
BE YOUR OWN DAWG!
GO CLEVELAND BROWNS
#1 TEAM IN THE AFC!
WHAT A "D"!
WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!
Yes that was a bad call in the game...that was a fumble! Sala,
Sala.....If the Browns hadn't lost the ball 5 FIVE times.....I would
really gripe....BUT....This is the real life.....bad things happen man.
YOUR KING
|
61.1253 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 06 1994 19:45 | 8 |
|
>>Sala.....If the Browns hadn't lost the ball 5 FIVE times.....I would
^^
Yeah, and IF yer uncle had boobs you'd call him "Aunt".
JaKe
|
61.1254 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 06 1994 23:39 | 6 |
61.1255 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Dec 07 1994 07:17 | 6 |
|
Art had a big big team
who's colors were brown and white
and every team that played the Browns
were scard as they could be
and you could hear them ... cry
|
61.1256 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Dec 07 1994 08:47 | 4 |
| Hal, you'd better post the copyright permission to use the Be Your Own Dog
slogan.
The folks at Plank Road would get mighty pissed at you otherwise....
|
61.1257 | WOOF | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Dec 07 1994 08:59 | 5 |
|
I said DAWG ..... not DOG.
Your King
|
61.1258 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Wed Dec 07 1994 09:15 | 4 |
| > I said DAWG ..... not DOG.
Concept, man, concept.....
|
61.1259 | Give me Bernie | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Dec 07 1994 12:03 | 20 |
|
As the big game approches this Saturday, questions continue about
Troy playing. I hope he does because I don't want to hear on Monday
that the only reason the DAWGS beat them is because of their QB. I
just don't think the Cowpokes are good enough this year. With the
Browns comming off the big loss against the Nts, I look for this team
to go balistic. The only question is can this team win with Vinnie
as the QB??? Bill says he liked the way Vinnie played last week.
Funny though, I sort of got a chill every time the Browns offense went
on the field. Then to hear Bill say how good a job he did...???
I still would rather have ole Bernie Baby here. I see he played
the forth quarter last Monday.
Go Browns
WOOF!
|
61.1260 | but go the point | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 07 1994 12:10 | 16 |
| > I still would rather have ole Bernie Baby here. I see he played
> the forth quarter last Monday.
Uh, Hal, Bernie, assuming you mean Bernie Kosar, can be found in Miami
where he indeed played on Monday night.
The current scrubs behind Aikman are Rodney Peete and Jason Garrett, he
of Turkey day fame.
As it stands right now, Aikman says that there's no way he doesn't srart
agin the Browns. I'd take that as a compliment, showing some concern for
Cleveland's ability.
Unfortunately for all the Brown faithful, Vinnie will start.
TTom
|
61.1261 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Dec 07 1994 12:26 | 4 |
| This is how bad Vinnie's arm is. His hail mary at the end of the game
traveled a popwarneresqe 50 yards in the air!
Jimbo
|
61.1262 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Wed Dec 07 1994 12:28 | 9 |
|
> Unfortunately for all the Brown faithful, Vinnie will start.
Unfortunate is all relative. Vinnie, his long career as a starter
being exhibit A in the case showing the dilution of talent in the
NFL, has still been better than Rypien this year. Which may well
be darning him with feint praise...
Joe
|
61.1263 | either/or | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 07 1994 12:31 | 10 |
| re: Vinnie
Let me put this another way. The bad case scenarios for the Browns are
if'n Vinnie starts or If'n Rypien starts. Vinnie's never done it and
Rypien's days are behind him.
It's a shame cause the rest of the offense seems fine and the defense has
shown up quite often thised year.
TTom
|
61.1264 | and I hate the cowgirls | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Dec 07 1994 13:13 | 6 |
| *I* could start at QB for the 'Boys and beat the SkidMarks. Troy is no
slouch, but you have to wonder what Jerry Jones is thinking about his
big contract. It seems as long as you have Emmitt, Michael, and Alvin,
you can put anybody at QB.
Mike
|
61.1265 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 07 1994 13:14 | 4 |
61.1266 | Irvin and Harper may not be around long | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 07 1994 13:26 | 13 |
| > big contract. It seems as long as you have Emmitt, Michael, and Alvin,
> you can put anybody at QB.
One of the troubles brewing for the Cowboys is what to do with Michael
Irvin and Alvin Harper. I saw a_interview with Harper and he expects to
be gone. He's predicting that of the 2 he aint gonna get the big offer.
Michael Irvin, on the other hand, is playing a wait and see. He wants to
see exactly how big that contract will be. He's gonnna be in a bind cause
Jones is expected to make him "franchise" player which gives compensation
if'n someone else signs him.
TTom
|
61.1267 | Give me Mark but I want Bernie Baby | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Wed Dec 07 1994 13:49 | 9 |
|
I beg to differ reguarding Rypien vs Vinnie. I honestly think Rypien
is the better of the two. I have to think that Marks INT rate is
lower. At least he won't lose the game for you. With the Browns
offensive this year...its all short and the occasional long one. I
would just rather see Mark in there. Anyone have the stats for these
guys???
WOOF!
|
61.1268 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Dec 07 1994 13:54 | 3 |
| Can I throw it underhand?????
8*)
|
61.1269 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Wed Dec 07 1994 14:18 | 17 |
|
Browns QB stats:
G Att Cmp Pct Yds TDs Int
Vinny Testaverde 11 287 155 54.0 1979 12 14
Mark Rypien 6 123 56 45.5 677 4 3
You know, the perfect QB for the Browns right now would be Kosar.
The Browns don't need a superstar at QB; just someone who can avoid
interceptions and fumbles. Oh well...
BTW, Mike, I don't think you could QB Dallas past Cleveland, though
I think Dallas is the clear favorite no matter whom among their QBs
starts...
Joe
|
61.1270 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Wed Dec 07 1994 14:22 | 5 |
|
C'monJoe, stop trying to get Hal all urinated by saying Bernie isn't a
superstar.
brews
|
61.1271 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:43 | 2 |
61.1272 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:47 | 9 |
|
The Henderson's (?) will all be there da da da da da da da da
da da da da da assures us that da da da da 2nd to none.
And of course, Henry the horse dances the waltz 2 3, 1 2 3, 1 2 3
Or something like that,
George
|
61.1273 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:52 | 45 |
| WHAT IS A BROWN?????????
A BENGAL is a Tiger
And a fast plane is a JET
A COWBOY comes from Texas
And a RAIDER is tough, I bet,
A VIKING is from the frigid north
SEAHAWKS live by the sea
All are names of football teams
Just like they ought to be,
I don't know if it's true
But I think I've heard a theory
That Cleveland named it's football team
After the color of Lake Erie,
BROWN does not describe
A big, strong athletic man
It's what's inside the diaper
of a baby STEELER fan,
The guy who named this football team
Must be a Cleveland Clown
Who else would think to call
A football warrior a BROWN
If I'd been born in Cleveland
And there my life was spent
I'd find another team to cheer
From pure embarassment,
I, myself, have always loved
The STEELERS "Black and Gold"
i did when I was very young
And will when I am old,
Does the BROWN name come from BROWNIES
The girl scouts we know of sorts
Or is the name derived
From the skidmarks in their shorts???
Can anybody tell me
WHAT THE HELL IS A BROWN???????????????/
|
61.1274 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Wed Dec 07 1994 16:33 | 1 |
| .1273 gets my NOTY vote.
|
61.1275 | NOTY | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Dec 07 1994 16:38 | 5 |
| Another classic by Jake....
I can hardly type, I'm laughin so hard.
Keith
|
61.1276 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Dec 07 1994 16:50 | 1 |
| We need to put that to music too.
|
61.1277 | HAHAHAHA | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | One hand clapping | Wed Dec 07 1994 17:08 | 3 |
| All of my Pitts. relatives are gonna love .273.
UMDan
|
61.1278 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 07 1994 17:38 | 2 |
|
WAY TO GO JAKE
|
61.1280 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 07 1994 20:07 | 8 |
| I dunno who penned what I put in there, but I've loved it sonce the
firsted time I read it.
I cain't take the credit fer composing it, but I try and put it in
the Brown(spot)s(tm) note from time to time.
JaKe
|
61.1281 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Dec 08 1994 10:42 | 5 |
| re: .1280
don't matter still qualifies as NOTY.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1282 | Better stop have drinks after 6pm! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Dec 08 1994 11:08 | 35 |
|
Hey! You Fake..........You better watch it bud.....the Browns are
comming to your town too and boy oh boy arn't you going to be eating
lots of crow when they leave with 1st place in their pocket!
Lets see here....the Squeelers played Cinci last week and boy oh boy
did their defense look good!!! But I seem to remember a game against
the Cowgirls where the defense looked like crap....could it be that
yes, the D looks good against 2-14 teams but when playing highly
rated teams.....the D is lost.
Another question.....can we get an update on the scheduel strenth of
teams played against the Browns and Squeelers??? Would be interesting
to see where we sit now.
THE COWGIRLS GO DOWN THIS WEEK
The Dawgs show they are still breathing and lock up a playoff spot
while the squeelers lose to phili setting up the big game next week
for 1st place and home field advantage.
Jake the Fake will be walking around with cotton in his mouth
after the game from kicking himself and sucking on his toes.
CLEVELAND, CLEVELAND, home that I love.....
Why does the Squeelers where uniforms with yellow on them???
Could it be????
|
61.1283 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Thu Dec 08 1994 11:52 | 6 |
|
So Hal are you up for a pname bet on the game Saturday? Don't
ask for no stinkin points either.
|
61.1284 | and I hate da 'boys | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Thu Dec 08 1994 12:18 | 5 |
|
I'd like a piece of that too Hal. That is if your man enough.
j/
|
61.1285 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 08 1994 12:35 | 5 |
61.1286 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Thu Dec 08 1994 12:50 | 15 |
|
From the Cleveland Sports Mailing List; sung to the tune of Jingle
bells, it sums up most Browns' fans opinion of Testaverde...
Scrambling with the ball
Arms flailing in the air
Defender in pursuit
But Vinnie doesn't care
The ball is knocked away
The defense scoops it in
Oh how much it sucks to watch
Him blow another win
Joe
|
61.1287 | Wasn't that Bernie's Tune Too | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Dec 08 1994 13:00 | 9 |
| I thought the Browns used the same tune for
Kosar too, but with Bernie instead of Vinnie?
The Browns won't win it all to they get a
starting QB with consonant as the last letter
of his name instead of a vowel! You read it
here first!
zamboni
|
61.1288 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Thu Dec 08 1994 13:14 | 16 |
|
>I thought the Browns used the same tune for
>Kosar too, but with Bernie instead of Vinnie?
No; Kosar was revered in Cleveland. On top of that, he was a top
notch quarterback once, something Vinnie can't claim.
>The Browns won't win it all to they get a
>starting QB with consonant as the last letter
>of his name instead of a vowel! You read it
>here first!
You read it here first - zamboni agrees with Hal that Mark Rypien should
start!
Joe
|
61.1289 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Dec 08 1994 13:55 | 2 |
| yeah but the Bernie tune was about how he loved to wear Mrs. Santa
Claus' clothes.
|
61.1290 | In the snow.... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Dec 08 1994 14:26 | 21 |
|
Ahhhhhh, your just a wanabe! Bernie was just unfortunate to not
have a very good offensive line. He still is one of the most accurate
passers in the game! Remember............holds the record for the most
passes without an INT!
Back to the DAWGS......I see the Browns taking the last three games
of this season, getting home field advantage and flying through the
playoffs to the superbowl. Ernest Byner gets his chance in the Bowl
and again.....he fumbles, but, this time it is recovered by a fellow
Brown and the game is won!!!!!! Yea! I like it! Can't wait to see it
on TV! Then, all you will see is people walking around with DAWG
shirts on. You will also see Jake, root for the DAWGS durring the
playoffs because the Squeelers end up taking a dive and lose all three
remaining games and get beat out of a playoff spot by the Raiders, KC
and the Pats. Come on, get on this bus! We're going to have some
fun!
WOOF!
|
61.1291 | Browns and Pats may end up with the same record | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Thu Dec 08 1994 15:16 | 13 |
|
Now wait a minute Paul.....Going nowhere. If I where a betting man
I'd say the Pats win a superbowl long before those dopes from
Cleveland. The longrange outlook for the Pats is much brighter than
that of the Browns. Ask anyone but Hal and Joe.
J/
Although Joe is rational about such things
|
61.1292 | still no cajones!! | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Thu Dec 08 1994 15:25 | 5 |
|
So Hal are you taking me up on the pname bet or not.
|
61.1293 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Thu Dec 08 1994 15:43 | 23 |
| >>Lets see here....the Squeelers played Cinci last week and boy oh boy
>>did their defense look good!!! But I seem to remember a game against
>>the Cowgirls where the defense looked like crap....could it be that
>>yes, the D looks good against 2-14 teams but when playing highly
>>rated teams.....the D is lost.
HAL, you see the world thru fecal colored glasses. The STEELERS had a
rough start, going 2-2 over the firsted 4 games. Since then, they have
gone 9-1, and the defense has beaten the tar out of everyone they
faced, and, in fact, won a couple of those games. The only loss in
there was to Arizona, and that came in OT partly because Charles
Johnson forgot to hold onto the ball on the kickoff in OT, giving the
Cards the ball in GREAT field position.
BTW, if the STEELERS bow out of the playoffs early, which I doubt will
happen, there is NO WAY I would root fer the freakin' 'Spots. My
favorite teams would be whoever is playing against the 'Spots.
BTW, the STEELERS have clinched at least a wild card playoff berth, and
are the only team in the AFC who have clinched a playoff spot so far.
JaKe
|
61.1294 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Thu Dec 08 1994 16:06 | 36 |
|
> The longrange outlook for the Pats is much brighter than
> that of the Browns. Ask anyone but Hal and Joe.
OK, so I wasn't asked, but I'm going to say something anyway...
The only positions at which the Pats seem to be _currently_ superior
to the Browns are QB (by a _big_ margain) and PK (barely - Stover
has been quite respectable this year).
Now, while the Browns run has relied upon some NFL-old types
(like Pepper Johnson & Vincent), the core of the team is in their
prime or younger. Bill Belichek, despite the fact that he's perhaps
the last person I'd want dating my daughter dating (if I had one),
_has_ done a very good job in the draft (whether it's him, or a scout
he's fond of doesn't matter). After many years of awful picks
(Mike Junkin anyone?), the Browns put together, under Belichek,
a string of picks that has helped rebuild the team.
The Pats, meanwhile, have been trying the same thing - but I'm not
convinced that they've done as well (Bledsoe aside) as the Browns
have.
The Browns have one glaring hole - QB - and a number of places with
room for improvement. While finding a superstar QB isn't easy (and
the free agent pool doesn't look very tempting), finding a QB better
than Testaverde shouldn't be that difficult.
The Pats (again, to my less-than-closely-following-eye) seem to have
more holes to fill, even if none of the holes is as deep as Testaverde.
BTW - the Pats are also clearly superior at TE. There's probably
another position, maybe two, but they aren't coming to mind right
now.
Joe
|
61.1295 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Fri Dec 09 1994 09:09 | 14 |
| | Back to the DAWGS......I see the Browns taking the last three games
| of this season, getting home field advantage and flying through the
| playoffs to the superbowl. Ernest Byner gets his chance in the Bowl
| and again.....he fumbles, but, this time it is recovered by a fellow
| Brown and the game is won!!!!!! Yea! I like it! Can't wait to see it
| on TV! Then, all you will see is people walking around with DAWG
| shirts on. You will also see Jake, root for the DAWGS durring the
| playoffs because the Squeelers end up taking a dive and lose all three
| remaining games and get beat out of a playoff spot by the Raiders, KC
| and the Pats. Come on, get on this bus! We're going to have some
| fun!
Somebody better get this guy to pee in a cup.....
|
61.1296 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 09 1994 11:09 | 3 |
61.1297 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 09 1994 15:32 | 7 |
| Looks like that dose fo reality that the Giants gave the
Brown(spot)s(tm) lasted Sunday served well to shut up the Groaner, or
at least tone him down to little one liners he found in a Reader's
Digest.
JaKe
|
61.1298 | how's that for a one-liner? | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 09 1994 16:22 | 5 |
61.1299 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 09 1994 16:27 | 5 |
61.1300 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 09 1994 16:28 | 3 |
61.1301 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 09 1994 19:20 | 18 |
|
>><<< Note 61.1298 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
>> -< how's that for a one-liner? >-
In an age of people who think at lightning like speed, yer brain is
still caught up at 110 baud.
>>Jake doesn't like the Browns because he can't fit in the seats at
>>Cleveland stadium.
Never been ther, never will be there. The stench of the painted sewage
sludge they call a playing surface is too offensive.
JaKe
|
61.1302 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 09 1994 22:54 | 9 |
|
>>Jake doesn't like the Browns because he can't fit in the seats at
>>Cleveland stadium.
Nah, Groaner, if the average Clevescum wimmen cain fit in the seats
there, there'd be PLENTY of room fer my big posterior.
JaKe
|
61.1303 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 16:45 | 19 |
61.1304 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 17:25 | 22 |
61.1305 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 17:39 | 5 |
61.1306 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 22:54 | 4 |
61.1307 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 22:54 | 4 |
61.1308 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 22:55 | 8 |
61.1309 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 22:56 | 3 |
61.1310 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 22:59 | 2 |
61.1311 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 23:02 | 4 |
61.1312 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 23:03 | 15 |
61.1313 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 23:04 | 18 |
61.1314 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Dec 10 1994 23:05 | 16 |
61.1315 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Dec 11 1994 10:03 | 4 |
61.1316 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Dec 11 1994 10:04 | 3 |
61.1317 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Dec 11 1994 18:34 | 6 |
61.1318 | Lip this, Wagon-jumper! | MKFSA::LONG | | Sun Dec 11 1994 21:33 | 14 |
| First complete Browns game I've caught. They looked good. (NOTE
Groaner, I said good, not great.) Some will say that the Cowboys
laid down for them since the team from Dallas was already in the
'offs.
Myself I think the Browns played OVER their heads while the Cowboys
got caught unprepared.
I guess from the last group of dribble Groaner now thinks the Browns
are the best team in the NFL AGAIN! Hope you got your tape ready for
next Sunday!
billl
|
61.1319 | | MKFSA::LONG | | Sun Dec 11 1994 21:35 | 5 |
| BTW, Groaner, I hope you and your pal Hal aren't going to try and
weasel out of the Division Champ bet.
billl
|
61.1320 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Mon Dec 12 1994 08:35 | 13 |
|
So, as everyone agreed it would, the AFC Central comes down to
the Cleveland-Pittsburgh game in Pittsburgh. (Sidenote - how often
have we seen JaKe and Paul agree on something in SPORTS?) Not only
that, but since the other AFC teams seem to be working their way
constantly to mediocrity, the Steelers and Browns appear to be the
best two teams this year in the AFC, and the winner of the game clearly
has the best chance to get to the Super Bowl.
Should be a great game; given the respective offenses, I would almost
expect a defensive or special teams score to make the difference.
Joe
|
61.1321 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:15 | 21 |
61.1322 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:17 | 13 |
61.1323 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:20 | 8 |
| > re: .1319
>
> Bet? Wagering is against DEC policy.
>
Then why were you running a big p-name bet, back around the time of
the Browns-Pats game?
|
61.1324 | Dallas win nice, but loss to Giants last week was the big one | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:31 | 14 |
|
> If the Browns win next week, both teams are 11-4, they would be 1-1
> in head to head and have the same division record. The next tie
> breaker is the conference record and the Steelers would have 2 losses
> compared to Cleveland's 3.
True enough. As impressive as Cleveland's win over Dallas might have
been, with the Steelers' victory over Philly it became meaningless to
the AFC Central title picture. The Browns could have lost and they'd
still have needed the same as they do now: a win over the Steelers and
Seattle, and a Steeler loss to San Diego.
glenn
|
61.1325 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:40 | 18 |
|
>>Dawgs 19-14. Frankly, if the Browns weren't looking past this game to
>>the Steelers game, they might have really put the hurt on the Cowboys.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Funniest note I've EVER seen from you, Groaner. THe 'SPots played as
over their haids as they ever have, that coupled with Aikman trying to
shake the rust out after missing two games, and Novacek losing his
footing and falling 3 inches short(just like you do Groaner) gave the
'Spots a win.
The STEELERS win the AFC Central and homefield with one victory, in
either game, in the remaining two games.
JaKe
|
61.1326 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:51 | 4 |
61.1327 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:55 | 14 |
| I love how yer tune changes to suit whatever you have to do to feel in
control.
My prediction fer nexted week,
STEELERS 17
Heathen_Scumbags_From_Clevescum 6
Ya heerd it here firsted.
JaKe
|
61.1328 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:52 | 16 |
| > This could set up a strange scenario where as the Browns could end up
> at 12-4, the Steelers at 12-4. The Browns would have the second best
> record in the AFC and would get home field until they meet the Steelers
> in the AFC Championship. THis assumes a Browns win next week and that
> the Steelers don't choke the following week against SD.
Nope. This would give Cleveland a first-round home game as the best
wild card team, with a week off for Pittsburgh as the best overall.
The following week, Cleveland would be on the road against one of the
two division winners with a first-round bye (assuming the Browns would
win the wild card game), very possibly against Pittsburgh depending on
the result of the other first-round playoff game). Cleveland CANNOT
host a second round game if they fail to win the division; no wild card
team can host a division winner in the playoffs (unless they host the
Super Bowl and happen to make it that far).
|
61.1329 | why bother? | MKFSA::LONG | | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:06 | 13 |
| re .1322:
Nice technique there, Groaner, when you can't think of anything
intelligent to add you try the personnal attack.
I guess that's what I get for paying a compliment to the Browns.
re bet:
If I'm not mistaken you are the origiantor of the friendly wager.
billl
|
61.1330 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:15 | 18 |
|
>>re bet:
>>If I'm not mistaken you are the origiantor of the friendly wager.
billl,
what you fail to see so far is that now that the cards are against him,
Groaner is wimping out, ya see, the STEELERS only have to win 1 of
their remaing 2 games to win the division, while the 'Spots have to win
both, and with them playing the STEELERS nexted week,their chances of
winning 2 games is slim and none.
I'm trying to talk him into a p-name on Sunday's game, but he's doing
the ol Texass two-step around the subject, as usual.
JaKe
|
61.1331 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:17 | 15 |
|
<<< Note 61.1322 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
>>I never said the Browns were the best team in the NFL. Like I said,
>>long on lip, short on brains.
Ya know, Groaner, a better description of you I've never heerd, and you
described YERSELF this way.
Thanks
JaKe
|
61.1332 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:19 | 8 |
61.1333 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:20 | 6 |
61.1334 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Dec 12 1994 12:17 | 2 |
| Groaner, welcome to SPORTS in December! We haven't seen you here this
late in years.
|
61.1335 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Mon Dec 12 1994 12:24 | 8 |
|
If Pitt wins the #1 team in the AFC. And if Clevland makes it past
the first rd of the playoffs and are rated the worst team record
wise/Non division winner. Pitt plays them. I believe this was the
format last year?
Chap
|
61.1336 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:24 | 7 |
61.1337 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:28 | 2 |
61.1338 | But the Raiders will win the AFC | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:39 | 23 |
|
Lets say for arguments sake!!
Pitt 12-4 Ranked #1
MIA 11-5 #2
SD 10-6 #3
Cle 10-6 #4
Rai 10-6 #5
NE 10-6 #6
NE at SD
Rai at CLE
Pitt vs Lowest rated team left. So if Cle beats the RAI (doubt it)
and SD beats the Pats.
Cle at Pitt
SD at MIA
Mia at Pitt
Pitt vs SF for the Ringsssss?????
|
61.1339 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:49 | 8 |
61.1340 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:55 | 12 |
|
Groaner I pray we Cleveland faces the Raiders in the Playoffs
cuz Mr Testaverde will learn Terry McDaniels name real well!!!
Clevelands beats 1 good team all year and you can tell other
teams they suck????
Chap
|
61.1341 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:16 | 6 |
|
Cleveland/Pittsburgh will be seeded #1 and #4. There is NO WAY
they can meet in the AFC Championship game. They will meet in
round 2, if the #4 team doesn't choke against ?
Ron
|
61.1342 | It's possible | BSS::MENDEZ | | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:35 | 4 |
| assuming that Pittsburgh is seeded 1 and cleveland 4; It is quite
possible that Cleveland and Pittsburgh could meet in AFC
chammpionship...
|
61.1343 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:43 | 5 |
|
And they will be seeded that high because they play in the worst
division in the NFL.
brews
|
61.1344 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:46 | 7 |
|
You are definitely right in Cleveland's case!!
Chap
|
61.1345 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 12 1994 14:47 | 39 |
| > Cleveland/Pittsburgh will be seeded #1 and #4. There is NO WAY
> they can meet in the AFC Championship game. They will meet in
> round 2, if the #4 team doesn't choke against ?
This is just as wrong as saying they can't meet in the second round.
Assuming the Steelers beat either Cleveland or San Diego, they will be the
#1 seed in the AFC playoffs. Cleveland will almost certainly be the top
wild card team.
#1 Pittsburgh
#2 AFC East or AFC West champ
#3 AFC East or AFC West champ
#4 Cleveland
#5 AFC Wild Card #2
#6 AFC Wild Card #3
If the #3 seed (a division winner) wins their first round game, and
Cleveland wins it first round game, Cleveland would play at Pittsburgh in
the second round (Groaner is wrong, they can meet in the second round; the
rules regarding this changed several years ago). If the #3 seed loses to
the #6 seed in the first round, Pittsburgh would host the #6 seed, while
Cleveland (with a first-round win) would play at the #2 seed. Pittsburgh
and Cleveland second-round wins under this scenario would have them
meet in the AFC championship game.
At this point, it appears to me that it will be:
#1 Pittsgurgh
#2 Miami
#3 L.A.Raiders or San Diego (probably San Diego)
#4 CLeveland
#5 L.A.Raiders or San Diego (probably L.A.Raiders)
#6 next week's Buffalo/New England winner (probably, and sadly, Buffalo)
The playoofs would then see (as an early guess)
First round: Buffalo over San Diego, and Cleveland over Los Angeles
Second round: Buffalo over Pittsburgh, and Miami over Cleveland
AFC Title: Buffalo over Miami
Super Bowl: Buffalo over San Fransisco :^)
|
61.1346 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Dec 12 1994 15:26 | 2 |
| Folks seem to be giving the Chargers a lot of credit in here. I think
they'll be lucky to get a wildcard, let alone the division title.
|
61.1347 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 12 1994 15:30 | 3 |
61.1348 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 12 1994 15:45 | 22 |
|
>> The playoofs would then see (as an early guess)
>> First round: Buffalo over San Diego, and Cleveland over Los Angeles
>> Second round: Buffalo over Pittsburgh, and Miami over Cleveland
>> AFC Title: Buffalo over Miami
>> Super Bowl: Buffalo over San Fransisco :^)
HAHAHAHAHA, you sound like the HAL/Groaner of the Bills, now.
The BILLS won't be around to embarrass the AFC this year, the STEELERS
will bring the Lombardi Trophy back to the AFC this year.
In the lasted 20 years, only 2 AFC teams have won SUper Bowls, the
teams????
The STEELERS and the Faiders.
JaKE
|
61.1349 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 12 1994 15:46 | 16 |
|
Things look pretty good for San Diego, even if they lose their last
two games. They own all the tie breakers in their division, having gone
6-2 (losses to LA & Denver). So either the Raiders or the Chiefs will
have= to beat them outright for the division championship. And if they
lose their last two games (Jets & Steelers) they will have a 7-5
conference record. And of the other teams that could finish 9-7
only Buffalo could beat that mark. Or if they finish in a two-way tie
with New England, they would lose out due to head-to-head.
Most likely there will be three or more teams tied at 9-7, and in
that case the Chargers look OK...
JimH
|
61.1350 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Mon Dec 12 1994 19:16 | 9 |
| Midnight is fast approaching fer Cinderella(Brown(spot)s(tm) and their
cinderella season, and trying to win the AFC Central. The only shoe
they'll get is the 14EEE boot from the STEELERS Sunday, right in their
wimpy little a$$es.
Ya heerd it hear firsted
JaKe
|
61.1351 | glad they're showing it here too | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Dec 12 1994 23:28 | 3 |
| Games like this in the past that saw the same hype over their defenses
usually surprised people with the number of points scored (i.e., they
never live up to their billing). I say the Steelers win this one 28-21.
|
61.1352 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 07:14 | 2 |
61.1353 | Could Cleveland be the team to beat? | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:20 | 36 |
| C L E V E L A N D B R O W N S
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
SQUEELERS>>>/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best game of the year thus far with the DAWGS giving the Cowgirls
something to think about. The Browns totally outplayed Dallas which
the score did not indicate. Have to give Bill some credit here with
the great gameplan. Also have to give Vinnie some credit too....at
least he didn't lose the game for the DAWGS. Give this man a raise...
LEROY HOARD.....player of the game award. Ole Leroy has done it with
really no blocking either, as the Iceman stated earlier...no Vardell
but a real loss was McKardell?? Wasn't that his name.....the TE the
Browns lost for the year a month or so ago? A great blocker is all I
know. Without these two guys, the Browns are looking good! Imagine
what this team would be like if both were back???...
Game this week in the Rust belt....Pissturd Squeelers better look out!
The Brownie Buggy is comming to your town just long enough to pick up
the Central Division Tile and head to the warm climate...Miami!
Honestly though....This should be the game of the centry for these two
clubs. I look for the Browns to dominate with the Squeelers making
several costly errors as the Browns did in their first matchup.
Go Browns!
WOOF!
|
61.1354 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 14:05 | 3 |
61.1355 | total score <20 or >65 | MKFSA::LONG | | Tue Dec 13 1994 15:23 | 8 |
| I really thnk it's going to come down to the team that makes the
least offensive mistakes will win. Both Defenses are very
opportunistic and will make the other team pay dearly for INTs and
fumbles.
billl
|
61.1356 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 16:52 | 5 |
61.1357 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 13 1994 17:26 | 15 |
|
>>I really thnk it's going to come down to the team that makes the
>>least offensive mistakes will win. Both Defenses are very
>>opportunistic and will make the other team pay dearly for INTs and
>>fumbles.
Well, the STEELERS are best in the NFL at NOT giving the ball away,
with a league low 17 turnovers, couple that with the 28 takeaways, and
they're at a healthy +11 giveaway/takeaway ratio.
The STEELERS, for the most part, have not been beating themselves with
mistakes this season, that's whay they're 11-3 now.
JaKe
|
61.1358 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 13 1994 17:28 | 16 |
|
>><<< Note 61.1356 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
>>Special Teams for the Browns get the slight edge over the Steelers...
>>Metcalf and Baldwin are dangerous punt and kickoff returners. Is
>>Woodson 100%?
SO, there's one are the 'Spots hold a slight edge in.
I'll tell ya if Woodson's 100% when yer brain gets back to 100% after
all the brain cramps you been obviously having, evidenced by your
entries in here.
JaKe
|
61.1359 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:09 | 6 |
61.1360 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 13 1994 22:26 | 7 |
|
>>What is the Browns take away / give away data?
With TesticleVerde at QB, it cain't be very good.
JaKe
|
61.1361 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 08:10 | 2 |
61.1362 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 10:28 | 3 |
61.1363 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 14 1994 10:43 | 19 |
|
Cleveland Give-take ratio is -3
Pittsburg +11
Here's a few stat for you guys
Defense league rank season yadage weekly ave
Cleveland 8 4249 303
Pittsburg 1 3645 260
Offense
Cleveland 21 4140 296
Pittsburg 15 4426 316
|
61.1364 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 11:11 | 18 |
61.1365 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Wed Dec 14 1994 11:30 | 7 |
|
And #1 is where it really counts Groan_MAN
chap
|
61.1366 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 11:37 | 9 |
61.1367 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Wed Dec 14 1994 11:41 | 8 |
|
I just hope You and Hal are men enough to show up in here Monday
morning, cuz if you can't see that Steeler team is better than
Cleveland your living in NEVERNEVERland
Chap
|
61.1368 | glass houses and stones | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Wed Dec 14 1994 11:43 | 4 |
|
judging by your p-name there Chappy, perhaps you can book them a room......
;^)
|
61.1369 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | ItReallyIs a Wonderful life | Wed Dec 14 1994 11:46 | 8 |
|
Shad_up Mike :-)
I was just fumigating my P_name space after I lost that P_name bet.
chap
|
61.1370 | :^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Wed Dec 14 1994 11:48 | 0 |
61.1371 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:20 | 6 |
| I'm going to go way out on a limb here and suggest that perhaps there is
a rivalry between the Steelers and the Browns.
I don't know where I get that idea, just call it a gut feel'en.
George
|
61.1372 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:32 | 2 |
| I think you might be right George. I hadn't thought of it till you
mentioned it, but you could very well be right....
|
61.1373 | Good as it gets... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:45 | 14 |
|
Pittsburgh-Cleveland II is the regular-season Game of the Year as far
as I'm concerned (even if Pittsburgh can still clinch the Central
later). Dallas-San Fran was billed as such based mostly on hype and the
overrated championship game homefield advantage but the meaning of that
game will be long forgotten when those teams meet again. There's no
big rivalry there. This is one of the biggest rivalries in sports with
the participants holding the best two conference records for the first
time in a long while (my brother is even driving up from DC for this
one and says he'll sit and watch in the Clark bar if necessary, which
probably will be the case).
glenn
|
61.1374 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:45 | 11 |
61.1375 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:46 | 2 |
61.1376 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | ItReallyIs a Wonderful life | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:51 | 4 |
|
Raiders would Pummell the Spots!!
|
61.1377 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:58 | 8 |
| re: .1375
here is hoping for sub-zero temps and even worse wind chill.
oh yeah, enjoy the game.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1378 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:59 | 2 |
61.1379 | Rivalry for a long long time | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Dec 14 1994 13:03 | 13 |
| I just love all this hype preceeding the Steeler/'Spot game.
Ever since I wus 6 years old, this has been the big pro game of the
year for me.
Clevescum and Pittsburgh are only about 90 miles apart and an easy drive
via the turnpike. On one side of the state line, the only color that
matters is Black n Gold, on the other it's Brown. This is an area of the
country that has been very rich in football history. I just wish Buffalo
was in the same division since they are also in the backyard of Clevescum
and Pittsburgh.
Keith
|
61.1380 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:07 | 12 |
| Actually, Keith, downtown Pittsburgh to the denter of the sludgepit
they call Cleveland is about 125 miles, 2 hours on the 'pike if ya
drive legal(which nobody does).
The rivalry started off in 1950 and has seen 89 games so far.
AND, when the wind is blowing from thenorthwest, we cain tell that
CLevescum still exists by the stench in the air.
JaKe
|
61.1381 | 'Spots will get a whuppin on Sunday | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:37 | 8 |
| Since the Steeler's first suited up in the manly colors of Black n Gold
many, many years ago, they had a small rivalry with the New Yuck Giants
for about 3-4 years, a good rivalry with the Houston Oinklers for about
5 years, a great rivalry with the Oakland Raiders for most of a decade
and a non-stop, take no prisioners, we hate the 'Spots rivalry every year
since 1950.
Keith
|
61.1382 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | ItReallyIs a Wonderful life | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:19 | 20 |
|
Oh the 1970's!!!
We were the best 2 teams of that decade the Raiders and the
Steelers! It seems every year we would meet each other in the BIG GAME
to decide who romped up on the NFC in the SB
72 Pitt 13 7
73 Oakland 33 Pitt 14
74 Pitt 24 13
75 Pitt 16 10
76 Oak 24 7
77 Denver beat us both
Now that was a rivalry!! unfortunately we lost more than we won!!!
Chap
|
61.1383 | The bare truth | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:23 | 31 |
|
>>Stats, in order of importance:
>>1. W-L record
>>2. PF/PA
>>3. Yds for/Yds against
Groaner, if ya wanna talk "defense", the STEELERS have it on the 'SPots
in each of the above catagories.
as far as points go, and we're talking "Defense", the STEELERS have
allowed less points than the Skidmarks.
The STEELERS have, as a team, allowed 18 TD's, the 'SPots 19.
The STEELER defense has allowed 15 touchdowns, and a total of 169
points. The 'Spots have allowed 19 td's and 178 points.
the STEELERS, however, gave up one td via kickoff return, one via a
fumble return, and one via an interception return, none of the laste 3
counting against the "DEFENSE", persay.
So, if you look strictly in terms of defense only, ya know, your
defense on the field versus their offense, the STEELERS have better
stats in all areas.
Now, I await yer reply turning this all around, although I state FACT
here, something you rarely, if ever, do.
JaKe
|
61.1384 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:08 | 6 |
| who would have thunk it JaKe and Groaner arguing about which of 'em
uses facts in their arguments. I call it a drwa, neither of them is
real good about that.
The Crazy met
|
61.1385 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:20 | 16 |
61.1386 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:20 | 2 |
61.1387 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 14 1994 17:20 | 17 |
|
re: . 1385
1. Guess that qualifies Groaner as an Obnoxious Bulldawg - those are
real ugly things and the best one can do for them is shoot 'em and put
them out of their misery; hmm not such a bad idea.
2. Oh and about that IQ bit, Obnoxious Bulldawg can't even figure out
where a Watch
is appropriate I guess it puts the Obnoxious Bulldawg
further down on the scale
then where he ranks me; po' po' Obnoxious Bulldawg - #1 begins to look
even more like an errand of mercy.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1388 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 14 1994 19:52 | 10 |
|
>>Jake, have the browns special teams or offense given up any TDs?
Uh, WAKE UP PAUL!!!!! We was talking "DEFENSE", remember,
Oh that's right, you HAVE to slant it in your favor.
JaKe
|
61.1389 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 21:47 | 7 |
61.1390 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 21:49 | 6 |
61.1391 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 14 1994 21:57 | 17 |
|
>>Jake, read .1383. You said the Steelers Defense gave up fewer than the
>>total points scored against the team. I'm asking you if the Browns
>>offense or special teams gave up any points. In .1383 you adjusted
>>the Steelers D points and that's fine, I'm just trying to get the
>>same data for the Browns.
THe Brown(spot)s(tm) defense has given up ALL of their points. While
the 'Spots have scored 3 td's via
returns/fumble/punt/interception/whatever, they have not given up any
points via returns, so all of the points scored against the 'Spots have
been scored against their defense.
Unnerstand now???????????????????????????????????????????????
JaKe
|
61.1392 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 21:58 | 3 |
61.1393 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 14 1994 21:59 | 4 |
| No problemo.
JaKe
|
61.1394 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Dec 15 1994 00:00 | 11 |
| yo' Obnoxious Bulldawg 'ya gotta start finding some new lines; the lack
of imagination and creativity on your part is clearly confirming your
standing at the very depths of that IQ chart you seem to be sooooo
fond of. In fact the notion that you are just looking for data is quite
mind boggling; only real surprise here is that JaKe believed it, the
Bulldawg's tendency to obfuscate is no surprise at all.
JaKe wake up!
The Crazy Met
|
61.1395 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 16 1994 08:53 | 15 |
61.1396 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Fri Dec 16 1994 09:08 | 5 |
|
Perry? No... Langham or Alexander or Everett or Stover or any number
of players would have been better picks...
Joe
|
61.1397 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:37 | 97 |
| Statistical Sacks
from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
12-16-1994
Pittsburgh Nickname: City of Champions
Cleveland nickname: Mistake by the Lake
Number of Steelers Super Bowl wins: IV
Number of Browns Super Bowl appearances:There's no Roman Numeral for ZERO
Who the Steelers are named after: Steelworkers, the men who built America
Who the Browns are named after: Paul Brown, the man who built the Cincinnati
Bengals
Steelers' most famous play: "The Immaculate Reception"
Browns most famous play: "The Fumble"
Number of times the Pirates won the World Series: 5
Number of times the Indians won: 2
President when Indians last won the World Series: Harry Truman
College sports power in Pittsburgh: Pitt
College sports power in Cleveland: Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine
Number of major rivers in Pittsburgh: 3
Number that have caught fire: 0
Number of mayors' heads that have caught fire in Pittsburgh: 0
Number in Cleveland: 1
Pittsburgh's most famous doctor: Jonas Salk
Cleveland's most famous doctor: Sam Sheppard
How Hollywood views Pittsburgh: "Flashdance"
How Hollywood views Cleveland: "Howard the Duck"
Birds seen circling above Pittburgh every year: Peregrine falcons
Birds seen circling above Cleveland every year: Buzzards
Distance from Pittsburgh to CLeveland: 129 miles
Distance from CLeveland to Pittsburgh: light years
Number of rock fans who rolled down the backstop at Cleveland Stadium because
they "wanted to know what it felt like to be a baseball": 1
Reason Cleveland Republican Mayor Ralph "Fire Head" Perk gave for cancelling
meeting with President Nixon: wife's bowling night
Writers from Pittsburgh who wrote about Pittsburgh: John Edgar Wideman, Annie
Dillard, August Wilson
Writers from Cleveland who wrote about CLeveland: joke writers on "Laugh In"
Greatest Cleveland-born stand-up comedians: Arsenio Hall, Martin Mull, Howard
Metzenbaum
Cleveland's number 1 export: Paul Newman
Cleveland's number 1 import: Lake-effect snow
Cleveland's greatest contribution to American Political Thought: Phil Donahue
Cleveland's second-greatest contribution to American political thought:
President James Garfield
Age of Cleveland Plain Dealer's rock music reporter: 75
Age of Pittsburgh Post-Gazette's rock musci reporter: 29
Cleveland's three greatest rock groups: Michael Stanley Band
City joke of Cleveland: What's the difference between Cleveland and the
Titanic??
Answer: Cleveland has a better orchestra
Occupation of the person Pittsburgh was named after: Prime Minister of England
Occupation of the person Cleveland was named after: land surveyor
Important Cleveland/North Eastern Ohio inventions:
the messenger guard
the gas mask
public housing
the motorized spaghetti fork
the Rubber Bowl
flammable rivers
Important Pittsburgh/western Pennsylvania inventions:
nuclear power
cure for polio
electron microscope
movie theater
Mister Rogers
first newspaper west of the Allegheny Mountains
|
61.1398 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:55 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1397 by PTOS01::JACOBR "Red Dust and Spanish Lace" >>>
>President when Indians last won the World Series: Harry Truman
For some reason they left out:
>President when Pirates last won the World Series: Jimmy Carter
They also neglected to mention:
Inspiration for Indians team name: Famous Native American baseball player
who played on 19th century NL Cleveland Blues.
Inspiration for Pirates team name: Reputation of 19th century Pittsburgh
Alleghenies for pirating players from other teams.
George
|
61.1399 | toooo funny! | MKFSA::LONG | I miss Billy the kid | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:35 | 9 |
| If there's one this I miss not living in the 'burgh any more,
it's the city-wide chest thumping that goes on every year just
before the Browns come to town.
-.2 is a prime example.
billl
|
61.1400 | Anti-Groaner SNARF! | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:37 | 1 |
| zamboni
|
61.1401 | reminds me of the Colorado/Nebraska hype | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:54 | 7 |
| Hey Jake, the article forgot one. Wasn't KDKA the first radio station in
the USA ?
Anyways, it obvious, the Dawgs have no chance when they play the Men
of Steel on Sunday.
Keith
|
61.1402 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 16 1994 13:56 | 72 |
61.1403 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Fri Dec 16 1994 14:25 | 8 |
| After carefully reviewing the stats, weather, and stars....IMJIMBO
is taking the 3.5 and putting the garage on the Browns! Bottom line
Steelers defense has been too good lately. As Vitale would say it's
letdown city baby! Visions of bowling in Hawaii will be dancing in
their heads. I think it's a 2 point game either way decided on a
field goal with under 2 minutes left.......
IMJIMBO
|
61.1404 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 16 1994 14:26 | 4 |
61.1405 | Dog Dawgs | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 16 1994 14:29 | 5 |
| re: 3.5
You gotta love the .5 part of this. Winning by a FG sounds good to me.
TTom
|
61.1406 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Fri Dec 16 1994 14:29 | 3 |
| You said five bucks, you double crossin son of a *&&&^$$%^
Jimbo
|
61.1407 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 16 1994 14:34 | 4 |
61.1408 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:00 | 5 |
| So what time is this game on?
Is it the same time as the Pats/Bills game?
George
|
61.1409 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:01 | 7 |
|
Browns/Steelers game is at 4 P.M. It was moved a couple
of weeks ago to maximize viewer interest...
JimH
|
61.1410 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:14 | 3 |
61.1411 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:16 | 13 |
|
>Darn, I missed it in the paper today. Is it scheduled to be televised
>in Boston this weekend?
Yup, channel 4.... after the Bill/Pats game is over...
JimH
|
61.1412 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:25 | 5 |
61.1413 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:32 | 7 |
|
| Yahoo... its more fun to have people over and watch it at home than
| travelling 50 miles to some bar... although it can be interesting
| watching a game with 50 other Browns fanatics.
What time should we show up? What are you serving? Cocktail shrimp are
always good.
|
61.1414 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:36 | 12 |
| The bottom line Groaner, whether you just use stats that make the
'Spots look good or not is, the STEELERS are 11-3, and the 'Spots are
10-4, and whilst the 'spots MUST win both remaining games to win the
division, the STEELERS only have to go 1-1 to take the division AND
homefield throughout the playoffs.
And, if you talk SCORING DEFENSE, and you mean points allowed by the
defense, yer off base, cause I already proved that the STEELERS DEFENSE
has given up 9 less pernts than that of the 'Spots.
JaKe
|
61.1415 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:37 | 9 |
|
>>travelling 50 miles to some bar... although it can be interesting
>>watching a game with 50 other Browns fanatics.
Outside of Clevescum, there's only 13 'Spots fanatics worldwide, and
all have been certified brain-daid.
JaKe
|
61.1416 | B^) | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:43 | 23 |
|
> Outside of Cleveland, there's only 13 Browns fanatics worldwide, and
> all have been certified brain-daid.
JaKe, I hate to tell you, but there's more than 13...
(I mean, if there were only 13, wouldn't it be an awfully big
coincidence that 3 of them work for DEC in Hudson, MA?)
(Oh, yeah, almost forgot - you know, maybe that's why DEC's had
so much trouble; I mean, with Paul, Hal, and I all certified
brain-daid (which I will assume holds some positive relation
to brain dead), and we all work in HLO, maybe we're the ones
bogging things down. EV5 sure has been a drain on the corporation,
hasn't it?)
Actually, the Browns have one of the biggest (the biggest?) fan
organizations of any NFL team; there are Browns Backer groups
all over the place (including a number of foreign-type places).
I can probably find an address for the Pittsburgh area group,
if you'd really like...
Joe
|
61.1417 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:47 | 2 |
| Joe's right. They even have control over one of the local sports bars
on Sunday's for SkidMark games.
|
61.1418 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 16 1994 16:04 | 4 |
| Them's just other brain-daids lead by the certified brain-daid.
JaKe
|
61.1419 | I wanna see the game, but maybe not in Boston | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Dec 16 1994 16:23 | 9 |
| But didn't Bob Lobel say once upon a time that WBZ couldn't
show a 4:00 game if the Pats played at 1:00? I thought it was
some kind of inane NFL rule.
The game is on the national docket for NBC this weekend at
4:00. I'm actually looking forward to it. With those two
D's, it ought to be a head knocker.
zamboni
|
61.1420 | Has a Holy Cross connection somehow too | AKOCOA::BREEN | Come Monday... | Fri Dec 16 1994 16:25 | 5 |
| Was that ancient Indian Sockelexis? Joe Dugan used to talk about him
all the time. Apparently he was like a legendary version of Jim
Thorpe although he did actual exist and play.
I'm surprised Ken Burns didn't mention him.
|
61.1421 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Fri Dec 16 1994 16:40 | 14 |
|
>But didn't Bob Lobel say once upon a time that WBZ couldn't
>show a 4:00 game if the Pats played at 1:00? I thought it was
>some kind of inane NFL rule.
Yes, when the Pats are at home and the game is shown on local TV,
channel 4 cannot show the other NBC game. When the Pats are on the road
(as the are this week in Buffalo) they can show the 2nd game.
JimH
|
61.1422 | football at its best...be there...this Sunday! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Dec 16 1994 18:07 | 35 |
|
Boy am I sick of reading Jakes notes in here.....what a bunch of bull.
Cleveland may not be one of the greatest cities around but they do
have
ONE HELL OF A FOOTBALL TEAM! and I don't care what
kind of stats you want to pull out of your A$$ either. Over the
history of the Browns, you will see that their stats are quite
good and much better than most teams in the NFL. Pissturd has just
been one of those pains you just can't get rid of. And, to be honest,
one of the teams I look forward to having the Browns play every year.
Everyone knows its just football and I would never hurt a Squeeler
fan but this is just great. This game is great. I was walking into
work the other day...with my Browns jacket on and as I walked by some
guy comming out the door, he says to me as he walks by.....Steelers.
I could just turn and Growl at him then we both smiled.....Other guys
here at work, wearing Squeeler hats, we just continually bump into
eachother at every chance we get this week. THIS IS FOOTBALL AT ITS
BEST.
There is no way the Squeelers win this game this week. You can
bet Cleveland will go into the stadium this Sunday looking to kick some
butt. We still have something to prove. We are getting more and more
respect each and every week, but it will take this week to get it all.
I've already heard many talk shows expecting Cleveland to go all the
way to the big game.
I've just freshly painted my shoes too....can't wait!
Go CLEVELAND!
YA GOTA LOVE THOSE DAWGS!!!
WOOF!
|
61.1423 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Fri Dec 16 1994 18:20 | 16 |
| Ain't it a shame how you, HAL, will probably be absent from this
notesfile Monday after the 'Spots go down in the 'Burgh????
All the notes are about over now concerning the hype up on this game,
now it's waiting fer Monday and Groaner to show up with his "adjusted"
p-name, after the Spots lose.
Let the game begin!!!!!!
GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!
Clevescum sucks!!
JaKe
|
61.1424 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Dec 18 1994 11:14 | 8 |
61.1425 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Dec 18 1994 19:12 | 7 |
| Kudos to ObnoxiousDawg(tm) for getting in so quickly;
Can't wait for the Halnalysis(tm) that will prove that Clevescum won
this game.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1426 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Sun Dec 18 1994 19:12 | 5 |
61.1427 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Sun Dec 18 1994 19:13 | 2 |
61.1428 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Sun Dec 18 1994 19:21 | 7 |
| HALwatch.......Ground ZERO!!!!
ZERO, that's the number of wins the 'Spots have against the STEELERS
this year.
JaKe
|
61.1429 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Sun Dec 18 1994 19:25 | 5 |
61.1430 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Sun Dec 18 1994 19:33 | 17 |
| >>Anyone know when the Browns-Steelers game is? I thought it was this
>>weekend, but obviously it was the CLOWNS-Steelers!
Ya know, it was a typical STEELERS-Brown(spot)s(tm) matchup. Low
scoring, lotsa penalties. BOth offenses shot themselves in the foot at
times with dumb penalties, and the "taunting" penalty on Derrick
Alexander hurt the 'Spots REAL bad.
The STEELERS finished the game with 298 yds offense, and would've had
300 if the O'Donnell hadn't knelt with the ball at the end.
Foster finished with 106 yds on 32 carries.
JaKe
|
61.1431 | re: minute watch - credit where credit is due | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Dec 18 1994 20:32 | 8 |
| hohoho; from someone who put a watch on JaKe at 9AM, from someone who
complained oh so bitterly about having a watch put on wheh he wasn't
around and then goes ahead and puts on a watch on someone else who is
travelling. ObnoxiousDawg's predictibality is quite tiresome. No real
challenge left; ah well have to find another one.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1432 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Sun Dec 18 1994 22:07 | 8 |
|
Yuck.
The Steelers caught the Browns' defense offguard in the first quarter;
after that, the Browns played better than the Steelers, but made too
many mistakes for it too matter.
Joe
|
61.1433 | Hey, we're in the playoffs.... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Dec 19 1994 07:27 | 14 |
|
Another gift to the Squeelers.....
Please Santa, bring us a *real* quarterback!
Name of the game......turnovers.
The third ones will be a charm.
GRRRRRRRRRR!
|
61.1434 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Mon Dec 19 1994 07:58 | 16 |
| If Bernice had been playing yesterday, the 'spots woulda had a chance,
not to mention the latest in dress fashions.
Vinny still hasn't recovered from the Penn State game.
He had a receiver so open the guy was leafing thru Parade magazine, and
Woodson had bit on a play fake and was the closest to the receiver, and
was 12 yards away when Vinny released the wounded duck, and Woodson had
enuf time to recover and knock the ball away.
Says it all.
JaKe
|
61.1435 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 08:13 | 9 |
61.1436 | must be because the Steelers played and easier schedule :-) | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 08:14 | 2 |
61.1437 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:15 | 7 |
| STEELERS had one, but good pressure all day long.
'Spots had two, one by M.D.Perry, but the other was, waht, a team
sack???
JaKe
|
61.1438 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:21 | 8 |
|
> STEELERS had one, but good pressure all day long.
I don't know - it seemed that Vinny had a _lot_ of time to throw.
There were instances of good pressure, but overall I think the
Browns OL did an excellent job...
Joe
|
61.1439 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:24 | 3 |
| I've only seen the Browns once this year, but I do think they need
a better QB than Testaverde. I think Belichick made a big mistake getting
rid of Kosar for Testaverde. Bad move.
|
61.1440 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:25 | 6 |
| Good one, Metz....(Vinnie hasn't recoverd from the PSU game)...too
funny.
Just goes to show that he Browns *still* can't win a MUST game.
Mark.
|
61.1441 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:33 | 11 |
61.1442 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:57 | 14 |
| > ... and Mark, don't get too excited about the Pats... they still are
> not guarenteed a spot in the playoffs.
I'm not a Pats fan, but I would think that any Pats fan WOULD be excited
this season because of what the team did versus expectations.
I don't know of anyone who figured the team would win more than 6 wins.
I didn't think they would -- I figured they'd have one more "rebuilding"
season before they really began to compete, and quite honestly I figured
them in last place or 4th place in that division at this point in the season.
I would think any Pats fan would be more than pleased and quite excited
about their prospects this season......
|
61.1443 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:00 | 3 |
61.1444 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:15 | 11 |
| >
> Um... what about the Browns team versus expectations. Predictions were
> for 3rd place in the Central with a .500 record.
>
What about 'em. I was talking about the Pats. I had no idea what
the Browns were expected to do because I don't pay that much attention
to them, or that division, actually.
I have an interest in what the Pats do mainly because of Parcells (first)
and georgraphy (close second).....
|
61.1445 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:22 | 4 |
61.1446 | The Browns are #2... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:24 | 2 |
| Yep, Groaner, the Browns exceeded some peole's expections. They are
clearly the second best team in the AFC Central.
|
61.1447 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:39 | 24 |
|
>Gee, sorry for bringing up the Browns in the Browns note. I'll go over
>to the Pats note and ask the same question... :-)
Well Groaner, you were the one who brought up the Pats, and the
fact that they have yet to clinch a playoff spot, in the Browns Note.
Somehow that fact makes you feel a little better in the wake of
the Browns loss to the Steelers yesterday. I don't understand why, nor
do I care. Just don't whine about somebody else talking about the Pats
here after you first brought it up.
And if the Pats don't make the playoffs, yes I'll be disappointed.
Simply because they have come so close (to within about 2 feet of the
right crossbar in Seattle lasted night, to be exact). But looking back
over this season, I'm extrememly pleased with what they've done this
year. Nexted year expections will be higher.
JimH (who is hoping for a Browns/Pats rematch in the playoffs....)
|
61.1448 | Steelers D >>> Browns O | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:40 | 16 |
| Turnovers hurt, sure.
But the difference in this game was the Steelers invitation to Vinny to
beat them passing. The game plan for the Steelers' D was to force as much
pressure as possible with just 4 guys. Normally, they've been rushing 5
and emphasizing severe pressure on the QB.
Against the Browns, they conceded some time to Vinny but had another
man for pass coverage. The Browns failed to capitalize on this with the
exception of the lone TD. Hoard provided little relief on the ground
game.
In short, the Cleveland offense didn't get it done while their vaunted D
yielded more than the team could get away with, at least yesterday.
TTom
|
61.1449 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:00 | 11 |
|
A serious question for the Browns' fans:
What do you guys think of Leroy Hoard? I've only seen
the Browns 3 or 4 times this year. But every game I've seen Leroy has
cough up the ball in big situations. Does this guy have a serious case
of fumble-itis????
JimH
|
61.1450 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:10 | 6 |
61.1451 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:14 | 4 |
| | Yes, the Browns are the second best team in the AFC Central. Funny
Hate to give you something to woof about, but right now I also think they
are the second best team in the AFC...
|
61.1452 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:15 | 5 |
|
yeah but on the front cover of the book with many pages is Vinny's picture
so you may as well burn the book now.............
mike
|
61.1453 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:17 | 17 |
61.1454 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:19 | 4 |
61.1455 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:20 | 3 |
61.1456 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:28 | 4 |
|
hopefully both but only one has a real shot at the Big One.......
mike
|
61.1457 | I love the Steeler's too | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:40 | 10 |
| >"I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS!"
This is a truely great P-Name for Groaner.
After one quarter, it looked like it could get real ugly and a possible
blowout. The Browns did a good job of gettin back into the game and
making it entertaining. They played good but not good enuf. The turnovers
were the difference in the game.
Keith
|
61.1458 | Give me the credit fer a good one, will ya | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Mon Dec 19 1994 11:51 | 15 |
|
>> <<< Note 61.1440 by PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing" >>>
>>Good one, Metz....(Vinnie hasn't recoverd from the PSU game)...too
>>funny.
Hey Lufay,
you bust my ass when I come up with what you consider "sick" jokes, but
I come up with a good line, and you give the credit to somebody else.
go check .1434 and you'll see the name on that one is JaKe, not Metz.
JaKe
|
61.1459 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Mon Dec 19 1994 15:44 | 9 |
| Who would the Browns fans rather see them facing in their firsted
playoff game?
For personal reasons, this Steeler fan would like to see them face
the Pats. I think the Pats match up nicely and would give them
a real run for their money.
billl
|
61.1460 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Mon Dec 19 1994 16:01 | 6 |
61.1461 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 19 1994 16:09 | 6 |
| Not likely. If the Browns play the Pats, the Browns will get crushed
like bugs.
It won't be pretty.
George
|
61.1462 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Mon Dec 19 1994 16:20 | 7 |
|
1st game doesn't make a difference becasue the Browns will be the host.
The Browns will with the 1st no mater who they play.
WOOF!
|
61.1463 | You might want the Raiders but not in LA... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 19 1994 16:35 | 10 |
|
> 1st game doesn't make a difference becasue the Browns will be the host.
Not if the Browns lose next week, and the Raiders win, as I understand
it (Raiders would hold common opponents tie-breaker). As we saw from
last night, the Browns probably can't afford to rest all their players
and not take the Seattle game seriously...
glenn
|
61.1464 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Dec 19 1994 17:05 | 1 |
| Jake, mea culpa!
|
61.1465 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Tue Dec 20 1994 08:02 | 10 |
| Friday night I was listening to some bozo on a sports talk show from
CLevescum, 1220 AM Jeff something or other.
The guy was spouting off on how the 'Spots was going to beat the snot
out of the STEELERS. Lasted night, I tuned in to the same guy and he
was taking some REAL healthy plates of CROW all night long. Pretty
funny to hear a Clevescumite taking his crow like a main.
JaKe
|
61.1466 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Dec 20 1994 08:35 | 9 |
| re: .1465
JaKester, I gotta tell 'ya that I have been totally surprised by the
Clevescumites in this notesfile who bellied up to the bar and took
their licks within a day of the loss to the Steelers. Definitely
different from what past history led us all to expect.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1467 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:35 | 4 |
| Lots of firsts for them this year:
1. Still participating in here in December.
2. Being here to take their crow.
|
61.1468 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:55 | 4 |
| Yep, the way things are goin, we'll have to make Groaner an honorary
member of the Black n Gold fan club.
Keith
|
61.1469 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Tue Dec 20 1994 12:45 | 9 |
|
>>Yep, the way things are goin, we'll have to make Groaner an honorary
>>member of the Black n Gold fan club.
Clevescum fans, to get in, have to post a $100,000 bond and promise
NEVER to root fer the Mistakes by the Lake again.
JaKe
|
61.1470 | Credit where due | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Dec 23 1994 15:42 | 8 |
| Now, now, Steeler fans, you've gotta acknowledge that the Brown fans
have stood up and let you shoot at them.
I'm particularly impressed by Groaner, who has maintained his noting
rate, despite the fact that every single note displays a p-name that
must eat away his insides. My hat's off to you, Paul.
Steve
|
61.1471 | Pats over the Browns.... | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Thu Dec 29 1994 16:29 | 34 |
|
Wow! I can't beleive that nobody has posted in this note all week.
I guess all the Browns fans are too skeared to log in from home while
on vacation, and make a prediction on the Pats/Browns games. :-) :-)
Lest I be called a Pats Bandwagon jumper by Groaner et. al. nexted
week. I'll make a prediction on the game now. The Pats will win despite
the predicted snowy weather. Look for Leroy (don't) Hoard (the ball) to
cough up the pigskin several times. Bledsoe will throw mostly to the
TE's (Coates & Burke) and RB's (Thompson & Turner), using the short
passing game to keep the offense moving against the Browns excellent
defense. The Pats defense will stuff the browns running game, and Vinny
will lead the Browns down the road to ruin.
The Barking doggies in the End Zone section will go home with their
tails between their legs!!!
And just to put my 'pname' where my mouth is. If the Browns win,
I'll change my 'pname' to:
"Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl bound in 95"
For as long as the Browns are alive in the playoffs, or
they win the SB.
Any of the 'spots fans main enough to do the same (New England
Patriots - Super Bowl bound in 95) if the Pats win????
JimH
|
61.1472 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Thu Dec 29 1994 18:54 | 5 |
| As of early this afternoon, there are still 5000 tickets unsold fer the
game Sunday in Clevescum.
JaKe
|
61.1473 | Pats double up Dawgs | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Fri Dec 30 1994 08:44 | 18 |
|
re -.2
All the Dawg fans in Hudson are on vacation but I too think they're
all skeert to show up. The dawgs won by a td last time and that was
without the Pats 2 best WR. They are back and the D is playing much
better than they did 8 weeks ago. I don't care that MDP will be
playing this week he will be a non-factor with the Pats short passing
game in high gear. Hoard will cough it up more than once one will be
a costly one in the red zone. Vinny Interceptiverde will throw about
3 picks and this one will be over in 3 quarters.
Jerry
Pats 21
Dawgs 10
|
61.1474 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Dec 30 1994 08:45 | 23 |
| > <<< Note 61.0 by LUDWIG::WHITEHAIR "CaVs will win it all!" >>>
> -< CLEVELAND BROWNS 'DAWGS' >-
>
>
> QUOTE FROM ART MODEL: We have gone long enough...3 years...
>
> The Browns will not miss the playoffs this year!
>
> The Browns will win a division title within 3 years!
>
> The Browns will get the home field advantage throughout the
>playoffs within 3 years!
>
>
> OR
>
> "I will sell the team and move out of town."
Looks like they got their work cut out for themselves next year!
billl
|
61.1475 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Dec 30 1994 08:51 | 4 |
| I cain vouch that Groaner is out in Ohio. My father is watching his
place while he's gone.
Mark.
|
61.1476 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake! | Fri Dec 30 1994 10:59 | 6 |
| Does this mean the game will not be on TV or will the league
extend the blackout rule? It would be ironic if Groaner couldn't
watch the game while he was out there. Course I guess he could
buy a ticket.
/Don
|
61.1477 | Very descriptive | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Dec 30 1994 11:39 | 5 |
| >Vinny Interceptiverde
This has a nice ring to it. Ya otta think about gettin a trademark.
Keith
|
61.1478 | 30 years ago today, they won it all! | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Pogue Mahone | Fri Dec 30 1994 13:29 | 10 |
| Hey Jim,
I'll take you up on that P_name bet, with the caveat
that I'm really a fan of both teams and hence, bearing
a Pats P_name would hardly be an embarrassment to me.
The Browns' defense is gonna make Bledsoe look like
a rookie.
Browns march on despite Vinnie, 17-10.
dr.a
|
61.1479 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Dec 30 1994 13:46 | 11 |
|
>> Does this mean the game will not be on TV or will the league
>> extend the blackout rule?
The league *did* grant Cleveland a 72 hour extension on the
blackout deadline but as of this morning there were 5,000 seats
still available. Obviously, Cleveland fans either aren't nearly
as rabid as we thought or they're expecting the Pats to beat the
dog snot out of the Browns or both. Either way, you're right, Slash,
it would be sweet irony if Groaner was out there and had to venture
out into the elements to go to a sports bar to watch the game.
|
61.1480 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Fri Dec 30 1994 15:47 | 8 |
| I must say, however, that the seats that are still for sale in
Clevescum Garbage Pit are absolutely lousy seats, miles from the sewage
surface of the stadium and behind poles and stuff.
the place should be condemned, and the football team with it.
JaKe
|
61.1481 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Sat Dec 31 1994 03:37 | 16 |
61.1482 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Jan 02 1995 22:05 | 4 |
| So did they show the game in Cleveland??
The Crazy Met
|
61.1483 | The Pats will be back though count on it | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Tue Jan 03 1995 07:13 | 8 |
|
Congratulations to the Cleveland Browns. They were without a doubt
the best team on Sunday. Executed their game plan very well and played
a physical game up front. Vinny didn't hurt them which was the key to
keeping the score down.
Jerry
|
61.1484 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 08:08 | 2 |
61.1485 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 08:12 | 4 |
61.1486 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 08:18 | 28 |
61.1487 | It's even worse than you think | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Tue Jan 03 1995 08:55 | 18 |
| .1486:
>> >Team names- Us: Patriots. Them: Browns. What is a Brown?
>> >It's a color, that's what it is. It must be an Ohio thing,
>> >naming teams after colors (Cincinnati Reds). Browns. Weak.
>> >Edge: Us.
>>
>> If I'm not mistaken Red is a color as mentioned above... Boston
>> RED Sox...
>> ^^^
Not only that: the Reds' name is a contraction of the original
Cincinnati Red Stockings. So the name is semantically identical
to Boston's.
But the Globe does have Peter Gammons.
Steve
|
61.1488 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:05 | 22 |
|
Here I am with my brand new Pname....
Congrats to the Browns, clearly a better team than the Patriots.
The Cleveland D played as I expected. Plenty of pressure on the QB.
And excellent coverage down field. They took Coates away from Bledsoe,
and then patiently waited for Drew to throw to him anyway... :-(
I also have to five Testaverde credit for playing a very good game.
No mistakes, didn't force any passes. He did a nice job a scrambling
away from the pressure whenever his pocket did breakdown.
Good luck in Pittsburgh. It should be a a great game. The Virtual
AFC Championship game, IMHO....
JimH
|
61.1489 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:51 | 22 |
| RE<<< Note 61.1488 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> Congrats to the Browns, clearly a better team than the Patriots.
I agree about the Congradulations part but I don't agree that the Browns
are clearly better than the Pats.
In spite of the fine day by Testiverdi the Browns just squeaked it out. Had
this been a 31-10 type game then sure I'd agree that the Pats got their butt
kicked but as it was the Pats had the dogs sitting on white knuckles right down
to the end.
That onsides kick was one of the best I've ever seen. He slipped it behind
the line of Pat's players and just caught the corner and someone made a great
stop to keep it from going out of bonds.
After that, one lucky catch and the game would have been tied.
The Browns just got away with their hide in tack in what their fans are now
trying to tell us was a laugher. That was one close finish.
George
|
61.1490 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:57 | 19 |
61.1491 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:57 | 40 |
61.1492 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:58 | 7 |
61.1493 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:58 | 14 |
61.1494 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:58 | 8 |
61.1495 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 10:59 | 4 |
61.1496 | maybe | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:00 | 5 |
| My main main Leroy Hoard is still keepin on keepin on.
Let the predictions start anew: Cleveland wins at 3 Rivers!
TTom
|
61.1497 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:01 | 14 |
61.1498 | Mark Rypien? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:02 | 0 |
61.1499 | True jeen-yus prognosticating skills... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:21 | 14 |
|
> I said it BEFORE the Steelers-Browns regular season game #2... the
> Steelers will not beat the Browns 3 times in one season... Cleveland
> will win this game.
Good for you. What a bold prediction, we'll win at least one game _if_
we play three times. Such confidence. You also predicted that
somehow the Browns would win the AFC Central while not losing these
three straight to Pittsburgh, so if you're wrong again on this one I
expect we'll being seeing you in here next week talking more smack,
to yourself...
glenn
|
61.1500 | confused | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:25 | 5 |
| re: AFC Central
I thought the Steelers already won this?
TTom
|
61.1501 | I guess winner there takes all | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:42 | 10 |
| tom,
the outcome of miami-san diego and their token appearance in the
afc championship game has been discounted by the same guy who makes it
impossible for me to root for Cleveland the rest of the way as I've
done in the past.
Of course looking at the Browns past post-season history my leaving
them can't possibly hurt.
billte
|
61.1502 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake! | Tue Jan 03 1995 11:58 | 6 |
| Hey Groaner, don't tell me you and the rest of the Browns fans
are off the Kosar and on the Testeverde bandwagon? Put Vinnie behind
the Pats line and Drew behind the Cleveland line and the Brownies
win 56-0. The game was won in the trenches.
/Don
|
61.1503 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:52 | 6 |
61.1504 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:53 | 4 |
61.1505 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:57 | 9 |
|
Does anybody know if the seeding holds true for the AFC or NFC
championship game? If Cleveland beats Pittsburgh, following the seeds.
They would play at either SD or Miami for the AFC Championship. Which
would be a big break for either SD or Miami. Since they won't have
to play ANY playoff games in cold weather and would be the home team
in the Championship game.
Ron
|
61.1506 | Vinny has nightmares in Black n Gold | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:02 | 4 |
| Vinny Interceptiverde is still a very descriptive name when he plays
against the AFC Central champion Pittsburgh Steelers.
Keith
|
61.1507 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:04 | 7 |
| >> They didn't win the AFC Central... oh well, they are still playing
>> and so is Pittsburgh, so not much harm was done.
Nice try to put a positive spin on it, Groaner but Pittsburgh is
playing at home in the friendly confines of Three Rivers. I'd say
that'd be enough harm to keep your streak of never going to the
Super Bowl alive. Not that that streak was ever in jeopardy.
|
61.1508 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:05 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1505 by SNAX::ERICKSON "Time for Vacation..." >>>
> Does anybody know if the seeding holds true for the AFC or NFC
> championship game?
Yes it does.
>If Cleveland beats Pittsburgh, following the seeds.
> They would play at either SD or Miami for the AFC Championship.
Yes, that still applies. But it's not likely. The Steelers should win easily
in which case the game will be in Pittsburgh.
George
|
61.1509 | Divisional winner has home | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:05 | 10 |
| A wild card team cannot host a divisional or conference playoff game
unless it's opponent is a lowere seeded wild card. In other words, in
this example, SD and Miami won their divisions while Cleveland did not.
They get the home field nod.
NBA does it a little different. Winning the division only gets you home
court in the opening round. After that advancing teams are re-seeded by
record only. Don't matter if'n you won your division.
TTom
|
61.1510 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:23 | 11 |
|
>>> Vinnie had the game of his life...
That was the game of his life????
Vinny needs a life....
JimH
|
61.1511 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:26 | 4 |
| Hey, maybe they only scored 17 points, but those were BROWN points.
What ever that means,
George
|
61.1512 | Not that the Steelers are going to lose, but... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:40 | 14 |
|
> Yo Glenn, I think winning this game is bigger than winning either of
> the previous two.
It's bigger only until both teams are eliminated from championship
consideration, or at least until one goes to the Super Bowl (just
making it _is_ a worthy accomplishment). If none of that happens then
it's just another big game that ultimately wasn't enough, where'd I'd
just as soon have taken the AFC Central for the bragging rights
(bragging rights that were oh-so-incredibly important to Dawg fans and
Art Modell, until they lost them).
glenn
|
61.1513 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 03 1995 14:27 | 7 |
|
>Yes, that still applies. But it's not likely. The Steelers should win easily
>in which case the game will be in Pittsburgh.
Just like did a couple of weeks back, right?
Joe
|
61.1514 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:27 | 15 |
61.1515 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:32 | 12 |
|
>>large offensive and defensive lines. Hoard is a powerhouse. The
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yep, them 38 yds on 13 carries against the STEELERS so far this year
really have put a world of hurt on them, huh???
NOT!!
JaKe
|
61.1516 | maybe | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:33 | 13 |
| > Home Field Advantage goes to the Steelers.
You and Danny Sheridan agree (cf. The Line).
> I personally think the Browns will win... I'm sure the Steelers fans
> think the Steelers fans will win. I'm sure the rest of the SPORTS
> noters want the Steelers to win.
No doubt about the firsted. Probably for the seconded. Not so sure for
the lasted one. You're not trying to say that somehow SPROTSters may
have been turned off in some way, are you? ;-)
TTom
|
61.1517 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:37 | 4 |
61.1518 | what it's all about | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:43 | 6 |
| Hey, 90% of the fun of something like the Browns-Steelers game is the
pre-game bravado and post game gloating and eating of crow.
The other half has a lot to do with entertainment and trade stimuli.
TTom
|
61.1519 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:45 | 6 |
| I agree that bickering over this is half the fun. Actually I'm pretty much
50-50 on the Steelers and Browns. Either team would be fine to see in the
Conference Championship and either would deserve to be there if they won
next week.
George
|
61.1520 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:48 | 5 |
|
Well, while I didn't expect the Browns to win the first Pittsburgh
matchup, I honestly believe they will win this weekend...
Joe
|
61.1521 | (8^)* | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:50 | 9 |
|
>>Well, while I didn't expect the Browns to win the first Pittsburgh
>>matchup, I honestly believe they will win this weekend...
Well, seeing the above statement, I guess you still believe in Santa
Claus, the Toof Fairy, and pay raises at DEC, right???
JaKe
|
61.1522 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake! | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:50 | 8 |
| Hey Groaner, you have one very big thing in your favor. Jim
Wardle is on the Steelers bandwagon and we know what happens when
he starts rooting for a team. The mail I've been receiving from
him the last couple of weeks has been signed JoS(teelers). I figure
I'm in a no lose position about this game. Browns win and Waddle
eats crow, Steelers win and you eat crow...
/Don
|
61.1523 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:07 | 19 |
|
>> <<< Note 61.1522 by DZIGN::ROBICHAUD "CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake!" >>>
>> Hey Groaner, you have one very big thing in your favor. Jim
>>Wardle is on the Steelers bandwagon and we know what happens when
>>he starts rooting for a team. The mail I've been receiving from
>>him the last couple of weeks has been signed JoS(teelers). I figure
>>I'm in a no lose position about this game. Browns win and Waddle
>>eats crow, Steelers win and you eat crow...
>> /Don
Tell him that if he changes his "rooting" to the 'Spots, and then when
the STEELERS win, I'll consider sending him a sixer of Iron City beer
to drink or strip the paint offa his car or sumpthin.
JaKe
|
61.1524 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:24 | 7 |
|
> Well, seeing the above statement, I guess you still believe in Santa
> Claus, the Toof Fairy, and pay raises at DEC, right???
Well, two of three...
Joe
|
61.1525 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:30 | 10 |
| Where the Hail is Hal?!
I go out and spend bouqueau bucks on a tribute to his KOH triumph and
he's never around for me to present it to him. I'm sure he'd want to
wear it this Saturday.
When is the nexted git tagether anywho?
billl
|
61.1526 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:46 | 3 |
61.1527 | THE YEAR OF THE DAWG | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Jan 03 1995 17:35 | 59 |
|
YES!!!YES!!!YES!!!
The Browns totally dominated the game Sunday and you can bet they
will be looking for Squeeler meat this Saturday!
All I remember seeing when the Pats had the ball is # 90 of the
Browns IN HIS FACE the whole game. The Browns showed that they
could score on the Pats anytime they wanted. It was just a mater
of eating up the clock on most occasions.
Vinnie is certainly the MAN OF THE DAY. You just got to give him
credit. Looked like the Dallas game to me. Great game plan! Have
to give ole Bill some credit here too. Only problem I saw was not
much of Metcalf in this game and maybe that was good too because
the one time he did get the ball...he fumbled. Could be a trick
though.....will the Squeelers look for metcalf while the rest of
the Browns tear up the yardage.
The Browns go on and the Pats stay home! The way it is, the way it
should be!
Another thing I loved was those fake reverses....THEY WERE GREAT!!!
I can't believe no one would cover the fake.....YES.....HE IS WIDE
OPEN!
VINNIE BABY......ONE MORE TIME!!!
and he doesn't get butterflies!
THIS IS GREAT!!!
There seems to be so much to talk about in Cleveland right now...
lots of controversy.....you have Vinnie, you have Mr. Michael
Jackson!!! YES SIR....LETS NOT FORGET THE MOONWALKER! What a game
put in by him this weekend! YES BABY YES!!! and he was benched
last week against Seattle....not to mention the fights with Bill.
Then you have Bill being himself and he even gave his first post
game interview after the game. You have Pepper Johnson.....great
guy and when he came in on the blitz.........Bledsoe Blew Blood!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.....I kill myself!!
Ya gota love the hype! This game against the Pissturd Squeelers
(just like a pig) will be the best ever! I really do think the
Browns will win this game too. You can sence the Browns are going
to win this game and from what I here from the Browns themselves...
they know they are going to win this game. I really think the
Browns want this game more than the Pigturd Squeelers!
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND
WOOF!!!
|
61.1528 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Tue Jan 03 1995 22:12 | 11 |
|
>> to win this game and from what I here from the Browns themselves...
>> they know they are going to win this game. I really think the
I think the STEELERS will have something to say about that Saturday
when they pound the hapless puppies into submission and send them back
to Clevescum licking their wounds, among other thangs.
JaKe
|
61.1529 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Tue Jan 03 1995 22:13 | 5 |
61.1530 | CARNAC Lives | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Wed Jan 04 1995 00:16 | 8 |
| STEELRS will win 19-6.
VInny Testicleverde will throw 2 or 3 int's, Hoard and Metcalf will
both lose fumbles, and Foster and BAM Morris will run wild thru
CLevescum's defense, with O'Donnell completing 14 of 20, with one TD.
JaKe
|
61.1531 | Musta been watching Colorado/ND | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Wed Jan 04 1995 08:15 | 8 |
| | The Browns totally dominated the game Sunday and you can bet they
Pssst HAL, it was a seven point game, with the Pats making
some key mistakes. Nobody dominated anyone.
What game were you watching?
=Bob=
|
61.1532 | Looking to see the Browns at the Dance | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Jan 04 1995 09:07 | 19 |
| >What game were you watching?
>
>=Bob=
He was wearing those Brown tinted glassed again while watching.
Everything is magnified by a power of 2 with those dang things.
FWIW. Joe Theisman was on Leno lasted night. He picked Cleveland
and the 49ers to be at the dance this year.
Personally, I think the game this weekend could go either
way. But I really think it will turn out to be the AFC
championship game. I think either team will run over the winner
of Miami/San Diego.
Personally I'm betting on a 3 point win by the Brownies, as
much as it pains me to say that!
zamboni
|
61.1533 | grass | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jan 05 1995 07:23 | 15 |
|
One thing I have to say about the Playoffs this year is that many
of the games just don't get me pumped....I really think alot has to do
with the fields the games are played on. When you see football being
played on artificial turf and in domes instead of outside on real grass
with the elements, I think it takes something from the game. Last
weeks Cleveland game *was* real football. Then the late game just
didn't give me the same warm fuzzy feeling.
This brings me to Pigturd Sqeeler Stadium. The Turds don't play on
real grass...do they? I remember thinking about this after the last
Browns game there....When did they change to fake stuff?
WOOF!
|
61.1534 | Must be close to 30 years now aint it | AD::HEATH | Dawgs Rule Pats Sip | Thu Jan 05 1995 07:24 | 5 |
|
About the time 3 rivers stadium opened?
jerry
|
61.1535 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jan 05 1995 07:49 | 7 |
|
Must be the water from those three rivers that makes it impossible
to grow real grass there.....or.....maybe the Pigturd people just don't
know how to grow grass like the rest of the nation.
WOOF!
|
61.1536 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Jan 05 1995 08:10 | 8 |
| > -< Must be close to 30 years now aint it >-
>
>
>
> About the time 3 rivers stadium opened?
Must be 24. When the Pirates won the NL East in 1970, they switched
halfway through the season to Three Rivers Stadium.
|
61.1537 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Thu Jan 05 1995 09:36 | 8 |
| As much as it pains me to admit it, I have to agree with Hal (did
I say that?). It pains me to see the Steelers playing on that
concrete floor they call artificial turf.
I don't think they ever had real grass in 3Rivers.
billl
|
61.1538 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Jan 05 1995 09:44 | 17 |
| > <<< Note 61.1537 by MKFSA::LONG "Steelers...strivin' fer 5!" >>>
>
> As much as it pains me to admit it, I have to agree with Hal (did
> I say that?). It pains me to see the Steelers playing on that
> concrete floor they call artificial turf.
>
> I don't think they ever had real grass in 3Rivers.
>
> billl
I remember the 1970 NLCS against Cincinnati, and it seems to me there
was a play involving Dave Cash, artificial turf, and the 3-0 extra
inning loss to the Reds (but that could have been at Riverfront).
In any case, I'm sure that the 1970 NLCS was the first postseason series
entirely on the rug.
|
61.1539 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Thu Jan 05 1995 11:09 | 9 |
61.1540 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:06 | 14 |
| How did the Browns ever get a sub-nickname like the Dawgs?
Seriously. Is is kinda like the Alabama Chrimson Tide adopting
the elephant and the Auburn Tigers also being called the War Eagles?
I remember the Washington Redskins developing a Hog relationship
with their offensive line. I just don't get the Dawg connection
with the Browns.
Could it have something to do with their long distance love affair
with Marge Schott?
billl
|
61.1541 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:26 | 4 |
|
Auburn has a third nickname. Plainsmen....
Claybone
|
61.1542 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:31 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1540 by MKFSA::LONG "Steelers...strivin' fer 5!" >>>
> How did the Browns ever get a sub-nickname like the Dawgs?
At one point several years back someone started using the pop song "bad to
the bone" for the Browns. After that the dog thing seemed to catch on (dogs
eat bones I guess) and fans started dressing up as dogs, calling part of the
stadium the dog pound, etc.
George
|
61.1543 | Go to it, Steelers fans | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:47 | 3 |
| George has just handed you the straight line of the decade.
Steve
|
61.1544 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:25 | 5 |
|
If I remember correctly, it was Hanford Dixon who first applied
the "Dawg" monicker to the Browns (well, to the defense in particular).
Joe
|
61.1545 | | JULIET::SHERRILRO | | Thu Jan 05 1995 16:18 | 3 |
|
I think he was into dog breeding and it he barked on the field or
sumpin like that.
|
61.1546 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jan 05 1995 17:33 | 6 |
|
The orange shoes are comming out for this one........the Pigturd
Squeelers will go down to the DAWGS!
WOOF!
|
61.1547 | IT WILL BE A DAWGS DAY AFTERNOON... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jan 05 1995 17:45 | 17 |
|
C L E V E L A N D
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
Squeelers>>>>>>>/ \ | /
/\^^^^^^ >>>>> -Pigsturd-
\_______________ / | \
D A W G S
WOOF!
|
61.1548 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Thu Jan 05 1995 18:00 | 6 |
| I'll just love seeing HAL in here Monday with his tail between his
legs, that is if he even shows up after the STEELERS beat the Clevescum
Skidmarks.
JaKe
|
61.1549 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Thu Jan 05 1995 18:23 | 10 |
|
Hey Mr. Artificial......I don't work Mondays.......so, I won't be
able to see your congrats note to the Browns till then....but, if you
send me your home phone number I'll personnally give you a call if and
thats a BIG I F the Pigsturd Squeelers happen to SSSqqqeeeekkk the
game out.
WOOF!
|
61.1550 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Thu Jan 05 1995 18:33 | 5 |
| I don't give out my home phone # to Clevescumites. It makes fer some
childish phone calls around the clock.
JaKe
|
61.1551 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Thu Jan 05 1995 22:14 | 20 |
| What's the ONLY sign of LIFE in Clevescum?????
_____________________________
| |
| PITTSBURGH |
| |
| 152 MILES |
| |
| |
-----------------------------
| |
| |
| |
/ \
/ \
/\/\/\/\/\
|
61.1552 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Thu Jan 05 1995 23:09 | 13 |
61.1553 | some info please... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 07:15 | 21 |
|
I hope someone out there and post the folling requested information...
it should be kind of interesting...
In the years that the Pigturd Squeelers went to the Superbowl...
1 - How many times did they play Cleveland?
2 - What was the score of those games?
3 - Who was the home team?
4 - What was the Browns season end record?
5 - Did the Browns make the playoffs in those years?
Thanks...
WOOF!
|
61.1554 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 07:26 | 47 |
|
Just a note about special teams.....
In the game against the Pats last week, I would have to say
that the Pats won the special team battle. I was not too happy
with the Browns special teams at all. Hopefully, the Browns will
get their act together here.
What I remember about the game reguarding special team
play....
1 - getting pinned back at their 2 yard line on a punt...
2 - fake punt worked for the Pats...
(Someone has to cover the guy out of the
backfield!) (What did they think the guy was
going to do when he started running toward the
line instead of protecting the punter???)
3 - on-side-kick....
(Don't you think the Browns should have come up for
the ball or attacked it???)
What would have happened if the Browns recovered
the ball before it went 10 yards?
Stupid rule though....letting the Pats kick the
ball a second time after going out of bounds on the
first try. I would have thought the Browns would
have just taken over the ball and declined any kind
of penalty.
Bottom line is you can bet the special team unit will be better
this weekend. I'd like to see the Browns start off at their 40...at
least...when the game begins. But, I will say this, the Browns have
been able to come out of their own end on many occasions and not have
to punt from the end zone this year. Hoard has been able to pick up
5 yards a pop in those situations.
Lets put them away early!
Anyone hear of what pre game specials there are going to be this
weekend?
Go Browns!
WOOF!
|
61.1555 | Woulda, couda, shoulda, didn't matter. | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Jan 06 1995 08:48 | 8 |
| >> What would have happened if the Browns recovered
> the ball before it went 10 yards?
Woulda been the Browns ball. Once the kicker kicks it, the receiving
team can get it anywhere on the field. Only the kicking team is restricted
for the first 10 yards.
zamboni
|
61.1556 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 09:48 | 10 |
|
Ok, so, if the Browns had tried to get the ball but was interfered with
by one of the Pats guys because the ball was kicked behind the kicking
team....what would have happened? I thought the reason you put all
your "hands" players on the line was to get the ball...not to let it
bounce around...comeon Cleveland...lets not let this happen again...we
may not be so lucky next time.
WOOF!
|
61.1557 | onsides musings | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Jan 06 1995 09:55 | 13 |
| I was wondering kinda the same thing. I'd never seen an onsides kick
executed quite that way, with the ball kicked behind a group of players
on the kicking team who are running into the players on the receiving
team to keep the receivers from having a shot at the ball.
I actually thought there would be a call against the Pats for running
into a receiver before he had a chance at the ball.
I will admit that I'm very hazy on the rules behind an onsides kick,
other than the 10 yard ruling.
billl
|
61.1558 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:00 | 3 |
61.1559 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:08 | 17 |
61.1560 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:09 | 3 |
61.1561 | Pats onside kick was clean all the way... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:22 | 14 |
|
> On the on-side kikc, the Browns should have called for a fair catch,
> then it would have been a penalty.
There's no fair catch on a bouncing kickoff. If there were, and if it
were required that the receiving team get a clean first shot at the
ball, there'd really be no point to the onside kick rule (you'd only
be able to recover fumbles, just as with punts). As long as the Pats
didn't bowl over a player without the ball to put him out of the play,
there's no call. And even then, in practice the officials usually let
it go, as onsides kicks are free-for-alls...
glenn
|
61.1562 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:23 | 15 |
|
> Steelers won all 8 games, so what are you getting at Hal, Pittsburgh
> is going to win and also win the Super Bowl because of this?
JaKe, you better be careful that corporate security doesn't catch you
in Hal's account.
re onsides kick:
Even if you don't call for a fair catch doesn't the kicking team have
to stay a certain distance away from you to allow you to attempt to
catch the ball?
billl
|
61.1563 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:25 | 11 |
|
> Even if you don't call for a fair catch doesn't the kicking team have
> to stay a certain distance away from you to allow you to attempt to
> catch the ball?
No. After 10 yards, an onsides kick is a free ball. It's as if it
were a fumble at that point, with all interference, holding rules etc.
still in effect...
glenn
|
61.1564 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:27 | 8 |
| >> As long as the Pats didn't bowl over a player without the ball
>>to put him out of the play, there's no call.
But I thought that was exactly what did happen. At least it looked
that way to me.
billl
|
61.1565 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:34 | 6 |
|
I could have swarn that the Browns were like the only team that
played the Squeelers tough durring their SB years....I guess those
OT games were the ones that stuck in my memory.....
GRRRRRRRRR!
|
61.1566 | Walt(e) I'm not... | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:34 | 15 |
| | x o | legend:
| 0 x o | x = Pats players
| --> x o | o = Browns players
| | 0 = football
^ ^
point 10 yds
ball was away
kicked
from
It looked to me like the Pats kicked it behind thier own men who
blocked the Browns off the ball until it went 10 yards. No?
billl
|
61.1567 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:55 | 7 |
|
That is what I saw...except the Browns players were behind the 10
yard mark and the pats were hitting them there. I didn't notice any
Browns guy going for any ball at all.
WSOOF!
|
61.1568 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Fri Jan 06 1995 11:01 | 3 |
61.1569 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Jan 06 1995 11:43 | 13 |
| > There's no fair catch on a bouncing kickoff. If there were, and if it
> were required that the receiving team get a clean first shot at the
> ball, there'd really be no point to the onside kick rule (you'd only
> be able to recover fumbles, just as with punts). As long as the Pats
> didn't bowl over a player without the ball to put him out of the play,
> there's no call. And even then, in practice the officials usually let
> it go, as onsides kicks are free-for-alls...
>
> glenn
Glenn's right, you can fair catch the ball if it doesn't hit the ground
first. Once it hits the ground, both teams are entitled to the ballm
so who would be interfering with whom ?
|
61.1570 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Fri Jan 06 1995 12:15 | 7 |
| Cleveland team may have thought ball would go out of bounds or not make
the 10 yards. Ironically Bahr thought his first kick was perfect and
the second a mistake.
Problem with browns attempting to field the ball before going 10 yards
is that once they touch it it is live and if they don't cover it
cleanly it can be like a fumble.
|
61.1571 | The play made me wonder | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Jan 06 1995 12:34 | 31 |
| > It looked to me like the Pats kicked it behind thier own men who
> blocked the Browns off the ball until it went 10 yards. No?
Yes
> Ok, so, if the Browns had tried to get the ball but was interfered with
> by one of the Pats guys because the ball was kicked behind the kicking
> team....what would have happened?
I thought the rule was the kicking team couldn't touch the ball for 10 yards
nor touch the receiver before they had a chance to receive the ball. So when
the onside kick happened, I really thought the Patsies were going to get an
interference call. But one of 4 things must have happened.
1) The Patsies somehow made a wedge and kept from "interfering" with
the Browns. (not likely, but possible, I don't remember the play
well enough).
2) The referees screwed up. (Wouldn't be the first time)
3) Only one player on the Browns (Metcalf?) is designated a receiver
by rule?
4) I'm totally screwed up. (Wouldn't be the first time)
> Woulda coulda shoulda coming from the man who backs the 0-4 in NFL
> Championship Games DONKS!
Almost got that right. That came from the man that backs the Donks
and the Boston Red Sox. I think I'm eternally doomed to woulda coulda shoulda.
|
61.1572 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 13:50 | 28 |
|
Just read the USA today. Good artical about the Cleveland/Pigturd
game. It goes on and says that Art had to be excorted out of the
stadium by 40 police. As he leaves you can hear him say.....
"We'll be back here"
It also says something about how the Pigsturd players were pissed
because some of the Browns didn't want to shake hands with them after
the game. "They won't admit that we (Pigsturd) is the better team"
said Rod Woodhead.
Then it goes on saying....."We will prove we are the better team"
said Vinnie Baby.
I believe they will prove who is the better team.
C L E V E L A N D B R O W N S
T H E D A W G S
#1
WOOF!
|
61.1573 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Fri Jan 06 1995 13:59 | 4 |
61.1574 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Fri Jan 06 1995 14:01 | 12 |
|
> I believe they will prove who is the better team.
I sincerely doubt the Browns will prove themselves the better team
on Sunday. Pittsburgh can; with any win, it's hard to argue
otherwise. For the Browns to prove themselves a better team (a
different matter altogether from winning, which I do believe they
will do), they'll have to completely blow out Pittsburgh _even
while Pittsburgh's playing reasonably well_. If that happens, I'll
be every bit as shocked as JaKe.
Joe
|
61.1575 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 14:16 | 34 |
|
C L E V E L A N D B R O W N S
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
T H E D A W G S
Oh come on here....what was Pigsturds record....one win better than
the Browns...so, if the Browns didn't have so many turnovers it could
very well be the other way around....the Browns one game better than
the Squeelers. And in that first game, even with the turnovers, the
Browns had driven down and gotten a TD but it was called back because
of a penalty. That close. So, how in the hell can anyone really say
the Squeelers are *that* much better than the Browns. It is beyond
me. No way. The Browns are the better team and they will prove that
on Saturday. I would have to say that if the Browns don't win, they
choked.....3 times. It won't happen, Cleveland will win this game and
it won't have to be a blowout either. A solid performance like last
week with no mistakes will be enough.
Its gona be a DAWG fight!
GO CLEVELAND
WOOF!
|
61.1576 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jan 06 1995 14:24 | 9 |
| RE<<< Note 61.1574 by ROCK::HUBER "Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions" >>>
> I sincerely doubt the Browns will prove themselves the better team
> on Sunday.
When is this game anyway? Isn't it on Saturday? I thought they said the
Miami v. S.D. game was Sunday.
George
|
61.1577 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Jan 06 1995 14:25 | 7 |
| >Win or lose Pittsburgh is the better team... so if they lose THEY
Nice attempt at the old reverse KOD, Groaner. We all know that
that never works.
billl
|
61.1578 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Fri Jan 06 1995 14:36 | 7 |
|
> When is this game anyway? Isn't it on Saturday? I thought they said the
> Miami v. S.D. game was Sunday.
It's Saturday; I was in error.
Joe
|
61.1579 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 14:45 | 11 |
|
Which brings me to another point.....I just don't understand this
one...
Why would the teams that played last Sunday have to play this
Saturday? Why not play them again on Sunday. Doesn't this give
another advantage to the teams that haven't played? So, the Browns
and Bears have to play on 6 days rest instead of the normal 7....
Doesn't make sence to me....anybody else?
GRRRRRRRRR!
|
61.1580 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Jan 06 1995 15:21 | 5 |
| re .1579:
We're not building up our excuses already now are we?
billl
|
61.1581 | reward, not punishment | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 06 1995 15:31 | 10 |
| Hal,
If'n them Dawgs had won the conferences best record they coulda took the
week off and then played on Saturday agin some team that play laste
Sunday.
It's part of the reward for the #1 seed in the conference. Cleveburgh
coulda had it excepted for them games they lost to the Steelhaids.
TTom
|
61.1582 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Fri Jan 06 1995 15:47 | 16 |
|
>>the Browns...so, if the Browns didn't have so many turnovers it could
>>very well be the other way around....the Browns one game better than
>>the Squeelers. And in that first game, even with the turnovers, the
Generally, the better teams have a good +/- ratio when it comes to
turnovers, Clevescum, luckily, played enough stiffs that their turnover
ratio being in the - end didn't hurt them as much.
The statement above shows how much you need to clean the diaper
droppings outta yer haid, HAL.
VINNY KNOWS INTERCEPTIONS!!!!!
JaKe
|
61.1583 | Peacock says Browns play sat noon | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Fri Jan 06 1995 16:03 | 6 |
| I think the Saturday - Sunday thing has to do with 4pm tv which was
locked up by the two coast home teams leaving Dallas and Pitt for Sat.
vs Sunday and tv probably made the choice there too.
I doubt you'd ever see a credible explanation from the league and
anything that says tv controls it sounds credible to me.
|
61.1584 | and then what would happen? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 06 1995 16:18 | 6 |
| TV could be interesting nexted week if San Fran wins and San Diego wins
while Pittsburgh loses. Then we got 2 west coast games.
In that case, who'd play at 11am-PST/1pm-EST and who'd play at 1/4?
TTom
|
61.1585 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Fri Jan 06 1995 16:23 | 5 |
| There has already been talk that one of the games would be moved to the
evening out east.
JaKe
|
61.1586 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Fri Jan 06 1995 16:24 | 6 |
| Let me clarify that. The NFL has said that if that scenario plays out,
they, with the cooperation of the networks, will have the late game
start at 4pm west coast time.
JaKe
|
61.1587 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Jan 06 1995 16:25 | 6 |
| >>while Pittsburgh loses.
Bite thy tongue, heathen!
billl
|
61.1588 | whoa | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 06 1995 16:30 | 5 |
| Just posing something, there billlllll
Not trying to speak illllllll.
TTom
|
61.1589 | damn sticky keys ;^) | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Jan 06 1995 16:34 | 4 |
| Okay, TTTTTom. I wasn't ssssure.
billl
|
61.1590 | lost own bowl contest | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 06 1995 16:36 | 4 |
| I did all I could to put the KOD on Cleveland. I picked them to go the
Superbowl over there in the prediction topic.
TTom
|
61.1591 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Fri Jan 06 1995 18:48 | 23 |
|
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
WOOF! /
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
BE YOUR OWN DAWG
A CLEVELAND BROWN DAWG!
MAY THE VERY BEST TEAM WIN THIS ONE!
|
61.1592 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Sat Jan 07 1995 14:42 | 6 |
|
It's been ugly so far...
27-3 with a little time left in the 3rd...
Joe
|
61.1593 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Sat Jan 07 1995 15:28 | 9 |
61.1594 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns are HISTORY in 1995!!! | Sat Jan 07 1995 15:30 | 15 |
|
For the Pats/Browns lasted week I lost a PNAME bet, which I
was obligated to keep until the Browns were no longer in the running
for the Super Bowl this year.
Well, with 2 minutes to go, I think I've fulfilled my obligation.
Let the dancing on the Browns grave begin!!!
WWWWWWWWHHHHHHHAAAAAAAA WWWWWHHHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
JimH :-)
|
61.1595 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sat Jan 07 1995 18:42 | 5 |
| A heartfelt thanks to the Steelers for minimizing the misery of
most of us in ::sports/.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1596 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Sat Jan 07 1995 18:49 | 3 |
61.1597 | lemminow lemminow | MASALA::DWALLACE | Digirola | Sat Jan 07 1995 19:25 | 4 |
| Know this is the wrong note but anyone got the final/latest from the
Dolphins/Chargers game ???
Davie
|
61.1598 | Unless you gots a time travelling machine | GONWST::OSULLIVAN | | Sun Jan 08 1995 02:06 | 2 |
| re: -.1 Try 1/8/95 Sunday at 12:30 pst
|
61.1599 | slapheid | MASALA::DWALLACE | Digirola | Sun Jan 08 1995 14:07 | 3 |
| These continentals are deadly - I thought last night was Sunday night !
Yours mistakenly,
Mr headonbackwards.
|
61.1600 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | ONE STEP FROM THE SHOW!! | Sun Jan 08 1995 16:10 | 4 |
| The game just started.
JaKe
|
61.1601 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Jan 08 1995 18:27 | 8 |
| Nah, ObnoxiousDawg no misery left for Jets fans we sorta expect bad
moves to happen; but for the fan who claimed his team was the greatest
and then lost 3 times to those dastardly rivals the Pigsturd Steelers
that is true misery. Wouldn't want to take any of that misery away from
you. Enjoy it!
The Crazy Met
|
61.1602 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Sun Jan 08 1995 18:53 | 3 |
61.1603 | Chargers 22 - Miami 21 | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Sun Jan 08 1995 19:55 | 15 |
| >> <<< Note 61.1597 by MASALA::DWALLACE "Digirola" >>>
>> -< lemminow lemminow >-
>> Know this is the wrong note but anyone got the final/latest from the
>> Dolphins/Chargers game ???
Chargers come from behind to win it 22-21. Miami's Stoyanovich missed
a 37 yard field goal attempt with 7 seconds left. FWIW, it was a very
poorly officiated game, but the bad calls seemed to balance out. The
main difference in the game was that San Diego kept the ball away from
the Dolphins for most of the second half. The game was 21-6, Miami,
at half, and the Chargers went ahead with 48 seconds left in the game.
All things considered, bit was probably the best game of the weekend.
Jerry
|
61.1604 | close one | GONWST::OSULLIVAN | | Sun Jan 08 1995 22:14 | 3 |
| re: -.1
Thought that was a 47 yarder? Certainly makeable.
|
61.1605 | Pretenders | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Canes and Hoyas,Canes and Hoyas | Mon Jan 09 1995 08:14 | 8 |
|
ahhhhhhh HAAAAAA HAAAAA
Browns Sip!!!!!!!!!!
|
61.1606 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Jan 09 1995 08:38 | 9 |
| > <<< Note 61.1605 by WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M "Canes and Hoyas,Canes and Hoyas" >>>
> -< Pretenders >-
>
> ahhhhhhh HAAAAAA HAAAAA
>
>
> Browns Sip!!!!!!!!!!
And yet still are obviously FAR better than your team of losers.
|
61.1607 | Hey, compared to expectations | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Mon Jan 09 1995 08:49 | 16 |
| I've always felt that a team's success is a function of expectations. For
example, the Mets' playing near .500 ball probably made TCM pretty happy.
Likewise, the LA Kings' run to the cup final in 1993 was a smashing success,
regardless of the outcome.
By that reasoning, which admittedly doesn't allow as much room for the pure
fun of gloating and trash talking, the Browns had a very fine season. The
trick now is to continue to improve.
Congratulations, Browns fans, on your success. Congratulations to Joe Huber,
especially, for enjoying it in a safe and sane fashion. As for you, Hal, I
hope you made good use of today (day off? business trip?), because there's
enough crow waiting around to feed Thanksgiving Dinner to the whole city
of Cleveland. Really sorry I won't be back in here til Friday.
Steve
|
61.1608 | and the td that was that wasn't?????? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Jan 09 1995 08:54 | 9 |
|
yes it was a 47 yard attemp. I didn't see the whole game but it sure
seemed to me per usual Shula got the better of the calls. I mean whoever
heard of a forward lateral being called a forward pass by a tight end
no less? Plus the Pass interference to get them in range was boardline.
Let's put it this way if it had been Vincent and Seay involved do you
think we'd have seen a flag???????//
mike
|
61.1609 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS Best in the AFC Central | Mon Jan 09 1995 09:52 | 3 |
61.1610 | How 'bout them Steelers! | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:12 | 8 |
| Sent Hal mail regarding p-name wager. He'll be in Tuesday sporting
a very appropriate p-name that he must keep for five of HIS business/
noting days. I'll be on vaca, skiing at Sunday River, Tuesday through
Thursday, but I'm sure he'll honor the wager. Afterall he's from
Cleveland, not New York.
billl
|
61.1611 | gawd i hate crow feathers | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Pogue Mahone | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:10 | 14 |
| No, they didn't all sip.
Vinnie sips.
Bill Belichek sips.
Art Modell sips.
If anyone with half a brain was at the helm,
somebody other that Vinnie would have started the second half.
You got a weapon like Metcalf and you don't give
him the ball until the second half????
Poor Pepper Johnson, he's the only member of the team
that showed up to play.
Congrats, JaKe etal, and good luck as this thang plays out.
dr.a
|
61.1612 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:22 | 6 |
| It's good to see all those Browns fans in here like real men, but
I'm kinda suprised that note 50.x is quiet.
billl
|
61.1613 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:30 | 7 |
| One thing that suprized me about the game was that, fr the most part,
Leroy Hoard was a non player. The guy leads the team in rushing fer
the season and ya bench him fer the most important game of the
year?????
JaKe
|
61.1614 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:31 | 12 |
|
I saw the following on a milk carton this morning.
MISSING CLEVELAND BROWNS FOOTBALL TEAM.
IF SEEN CALL 1-800-STEELERS.
I can't remember a more pitiful weekend of PLAYOFF football ever.
The Browns, Bears, and Packers should be embrassed. These games were
over in the first half. Then you have all the controversial calls
in the Miami/SD game. Just a bad weekend for the NFL.
Ron
|
61.1615 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:32 | 6 |
| re.1614
ROLLWARD!!!
JaKe
|
61.1616 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:35 | 11 |
| While not a fan of either team, I did watch the game with interest.
Quite honestly, I think Cleveland needs to get rid of Testeverde. This
guy just doesn't have what it takes to be a big league QB. No leadership,
no ability in the clutch, and he doesn't seem to be able to put two good
games back to back.
His receivers did suck though, on Saturday. Wow, lots of drops.....
'Saw
|
61.1617 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS, best in the AFC | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:38 | 11 |
61.1618 | woulda been something else | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:41 | 11 |
| Cleveland looked like a team waiting for a_excuse to choke. The drops by
Alexander just got this outta the way sooner.
If'n they hadn't dropped them passes, they woulda looked for another
reason to stink up the place.
The Browns basic problem begins with the Head Coach and extends through
his choice at QB, Vinny. The rest of the team has a lot of potential but
Big Bill and Vinny are just too much dead weight to carry.
TTom
|
61.1619 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:43 | 17 |
|
>>Cleveland completely got away from their game plan after Pittsburgh
>>took the 14-3 lead. This is Big Bill's fault. Hoard was not used.
Actually, the lead was 17-0 before Bumblin' Bill decided, with 4th and
inches on the STEELERS' 4, to take the three points insteading of going
for it, knowing he needed a TD. The STEELERS had enough time (under 2
minutes) to drive downfield and put it away wif anohter TD to go to the
half at 24-3.
What I found VERY interesting about the game was that, for once, it was
the offense that son it for the STEELERS. They kept the 'Spots defense
on the field for over 42 minutes. Only gave them 17 minutes to score
wif in the game. Great game offensively fer the STEELERS.
JaKe
\
|
61.1620 | FG = The End | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:47 | 6 |
| That there FG was the white flad for Cleveburgh.
You're down and looking bad so the Browns look like all they can think
about is not getting shut out. A truly chicken scratching call.
TTom
|
61.1621 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:52 | 8 |
| > Actually, the lead was 17-0 before Bumblin' Bill decided, with 4th and
> inches on the STEELERS' 4, to take the three points insteading of going
> for it, knowing he needed a TD. The STEELERS had enough time (under 2
> minutes) to drive downfield and put it away wif anohter TD to go to the
> half at 24-3.
Actually, it was a pretty short drive. The INT that got the ball back
for the Steelers put them somehwere around the 30, wasn't it ?
|
61.1622 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Mon Jan 09 1995 15:33 | 11 |
|
>> Actually, it was a pretty short drive. The INT that got the ball back
>> for the Steelers put them somehwere around the 30, wasn't it ?
I think the short drive that was from the 9 or so after Tim McKyer's
int was teh one that made it 17-0. the drive that made it 24-3 was off
of a kickoff after the 'Spots scored to make it 17-3.
JaKe
|
61.1623 | Vinny sold his soul for Pats' game, I think... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 09 1995 15:41 | 21 |
|
That call for the FG, down 17-0, was probably the most inexplicable
coaching decision I saw all year long. Made no sense on every level,
practical and psychological. Maybe Belicheck needs to take the
NFL's "Coaches' Introduction to Basic Probabilities" seminar.
Testaverde's performance wasn't a big factor in this game, but he
really is just without a clue under pressure, isn't he? Three big
plays under strong Steeler pursuit, each of which Vinny handled
differently, and wrongly under the situation. First he throws an INT
with 30 seconds left in the half, when even taking a sack would have
been acceptable. Then, he holds the ball forever in the end zone when
he absolutely can't afford a sack, on a play that the QB gets rid of
it without too much trouble 95% of the time. Finally, Vinny's hotly
pursued on a roll-out and he _does_ throw the ball into the cheap
seats. Only thing is, it's 4th down, where that wounded duck downfield
wouldn't have been a bad play. It's like you're looking at a rookie
out there instead of an 8-year veteran...
glenn
|
61.1624 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:00 | 10 |
| > I think the short drive that was from the 9 or so after Tim McKyer's
> int was teh one that made it 17-0. the drive that made it 24-3 was off
> of a kickoff after the 'Spots scored to make it 17-3.
Nope, because I was on the road Saturday. I turned in when the Browns
were kicking off to Pitt. The Steelers made a big pass but fumbled on
the end of the play, and Cleveland has the ball with ~2 minutes left
in the half, trailing 17-3. Vinny made a terrible mistake in throwing
the ball to McKyer to let Pittsburgh get up by 21 instead of 14 at the
half. But I definately hear the fumble, and then the INT.
|
61.1625 | the worst! | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:21 | 12 |
| > That call for the FG, down 17-0, was probably the most inexplicable
> coaching decision I saw all year long.
Hear, here!
This will be the definitive rejoinder to anyone who doesn't think that
the Browns problem starts at the top.
You almost feel sorry for the rest of the team and the fans. Having to
overcome Belichick and Vinny is just too much to ask of anyone.
TTom
|
61.1626 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:32 | 15 |
| I'm not usually one to defend the Browns, but I don't think that it is time
to start a witch hunt. Take a look at their record, they had a great year. As
for the playoffs, they are not really a test of team strength since they only
consist of one game at each level.
No one besides the Steelers was able to beat the Browns consistently this
year and they even managed to beat Dallas.
Joe Gibs who is doing TV for one of the networks made a point of looking
into the camera the other day and saying that Browns management should not
do anything hasty because of this one loss.
The Browns had a fine year, this group should be given another shot.
George
|
61.1627 | some are hoping | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:44 | 14 |
| > The Browns had a fine year, this group should be given another shot.
And the faithful in Pittburgh hope that they listen to you, George.
I agree, with the exception of a head coach and a QB, this current Browns
team is pretty good. Put someone at the helm who's not a brain dead
chicken and give them a QB who can handle pressure and you got yourself
something.
Until then, they've gone about as far as they can go. They might make it
to the playoffs where they'll be beaten again by the better teams who
don't have to overcome Belichick and Vinny.
TTom
|
61.1628 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:58 | 15 |
| Re <<< Note 61.1627 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>
>I agree, with the exception of a head coach and a QB, this current Browns
>team is pretty good. Put someone at the helm who's not a brain dead
>chicken and give them a QB who can handle pressure and you got yourself
>something.
How do you get to ... what was it 13-3? ... with a brain dead coach and
no QB. They're not that bad.
As I understand the coach is a guy who use to work for Parcells and is just
starting out as head coach. Is there evidence that he can't learn from his
mistakes? Seems this team has come quite a ways in just a few years.
George
|
61.1629 | Belicheck yes, Testaverde no... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 09 1995 17:03 | 11 |
|
Belicheck deserves credit, but Testaverde is not likely to get any
better than he already is. He didn't have a great year, and was not
a large contributor to the Browns' success. The Browns won with a solid
running game but mainly a great defense. It also didn't hurt that they
played the weakest schedule in the entire NFL. All told, if the Browns
think that Testaverde is the man to lead them to the next level, more
disappointment in the playoffs will follow.
glenn
|
61.1630 | belichick :== bad | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 17:15 | 18 |
| Who made the call to kick the FG on 4th and short down 17-0? If you think
that this was a call by a coach who had a clue than I won't be able to
convince you otherwise.
That's as good a_indication as any for Belichick. If this were boxing, he
threw in the towel.
Like Glenn says, they got as far as they did on other support on offense,
a very good defense, especially in terms of the points allowed and
kindness in the schedule.
Hey, I aint bad mouthing the team. A lot of those players would start
and/or star for many teams. Perry, Turner and others on defense stand
out.
Hail, I got that there LeRoy Hoard on my FFL team. 'Nuff said.
TTom
|
61.1631 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 17:28 | 13 |
| Re <<< Note 61.1630 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>
>Who made the call to kick the FG on 4th and short down 17-0? If you think
>that this was a call by a coach who had a clue than I won't be able to
>convince you otherwise.
I've often heard coaches say that if you have no points at all it's important
to get on the boards with something. Now maybe that makes sense and maybe it
does not, but when I see a coach take a team to 13-3 and I hear a coach like
Joe Gibs say he deserves more time then I wouldn't can him just because the
fans are upset that he kicked in one game when he was down 17-0.
George
|
61.1632 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Mon Jan 09 1995 19:30 | 4 |
| It was 11-5, George, not 13-3.
JaKe
|
61.1633 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 10 1995 08:24 | 18 |
|
George, the problem is that while Belichek has strengths (well,
at least one notable one - he drafts well), he's got notable
weaknesses, and in the three or four years he's been in Cleveland
has given no sign of overcoming them. He doesn't handle his players
well, makes inane coaching decisions, and just to top it off considers
the fans to be his biggest enemy. You want him as coach? You've
got him - I'll trade him even up for Parcells any day.
The Browns won in spite of Bill and Vinny, not because of them.
When your quarterback has as many really lousy games as good games
(both occur about once every four games), and that's his best
season, you aren't going far.
Hey, maybe we could trade Bill and Vinny for Parcells and Bledsoe...
now _then_ you'd have something... B^)
Joe
|
61.1634 | Peter Principle | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 10 1995 08:35 | 13 |
| Belichick suffers from the same problem that inflicts a lot of other
coaches in the NFL. It's the Peter Principle.
There is little or no doubt that Belichick was a factor in the Giants
under Parcells. He shoulda stayed as a defensive coordinator.
The same can be said of Buddy Ryan, another defensive whiz who is a lousy
head coach.
This may be of some concern to the Panthers in their quest for Capers
who's also a defensive coordinator.
TTom
|
61.1635 | Bozo the Coach | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Pogue Mahone | Wed Jan 11 1995 14:19 | 13 |
| Exactly right, TTom.
These guys are usually control freaks who try to
impose their views on the big picture. The NFL is
rife with 'em:
Ron Erhardt, Belichek, Buddy Ryan, Bud Carson,
Bill Arnsbarger (although he seems to know his
best position is OC).
Two I suspect will be joining them are Mike Shanahan
and Tony Dungy.
These guys also tend to being paranoid and adversarial
with the press.
dr.a
|
61.1636 | "NOT" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Pittsbugh Steelers == my heros! | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:50 | 15 |
|
Haven't heard much from the Browns facilities since the
game.....I wonder what their saying....must be something like....
We could have played a better game and WON against the Chargers.
Pigsturd Sqeelers SUCK!
WOOF!
|
61.1637 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Tue Jan 17 1995 14:04 | 21 |
| > Haven't heard much from the Browns facilities since the
> game.....I wonder what their saying....must be something like....
>
> We could have played a better game and WON against the Chargers.
>
> Pigsturd Sqeelers SUCK!
>
> WOOF!
>
Well, if they suck so much the Browns should have beaten them.
But bottom line, when you pin your hopes on Vinny, when you pin your hopes
on him having two good games in a row, you're gonna get burned.
Perhaps if the Browns add a few more coaches for next year, and some more
equipment, they might make it over the top......
|
61.1638 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 17 1995 14:14 | 6 |
| So why did the Browns get rid of Bernie Kosar? Was he all that bad?
Of course if Kosar had used up 30 more seconds on his last regular season
drive at Miami there would have been no Flutie bomb.
George
|
61.1639 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 17 1995 14:20 | 8 |
|
> Perhaps if the Browns add a few more coaches for next year, and some more
> equipment, they might make it over the top......
Actually, if one of the coaches replaces Belichek, and the equipment
includes a mechanical QB...
Joe
|
61.1640 | Hope this isn't a nest of snakes... | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Jan 20 1995 12:33 | 4 |
| Just out of curiosity, Hal, is the typo in your enforced p-name an
accident or a message?
Steve
|
61.1641 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Jan 20 1995 12:46 | 1 |
61.1642 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Cleveland Cavs = best NBA defense | Fri Jan 20 1995 13:20 | 10 |
|
No it is not an accident.....when Billll sent me the note telling me
what I had to put in my p name..........thats how he spelt it.
hahahahahahahahahahaha
just carried it on....
WOOF!
|
61.1643 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Cleveland Cavs = best NBA defense | Fri Jan 20 1995 13:22 | 8 |
| I can't believe they put Perry on the list.
Then putting Carrier on there too....hell....please put Vinnie on
there!
WOOF!
|
61.1644 | par for the course | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 20 1995 13:27 | 8 |
| Sorry, but we aint takin Vinny off of your hands.
Besides, he's Big Bill's Boy so y'all better get used to it. With the
coaching, and hence the cast, that the Browns have, thised year is about
as good as it'll ever get. Win some games, make a wild card, get blowed
out somewhere short of going anywhere.
TTom
|
61.1645 | draft McNair | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Biologically driven to hunt giraffes | Fri Jan 20 1995 13:52 | 5 |
| They did, however, leave Mark Rypien unprotected.
Belichek is an ass. I wish Art Modell would regain
consciousness and fire him.
dr.a
|
61.1646 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jan 20 1995 13:57 | 11 |
61.1647 | maybe, maybe not | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 20 1995 14:01 | 13 |
| If'n Cleveburgh is dumpin Rypien for the money, would they be willing to
cough up even more for Miller. Rypien is making around 900K, while Miller
is making around 2.4 mil.
Also, I've never seen what anybody sees in Miller. He put up some yardage
while at Atlanta but a lot of that was desparation throwing cause the
Falcons sucked and were usually behind big. He never showed anything in
LA.
I suggest you contact the Richardson who seem willing to talk to anybody
about anything even if'n means getting fined money and draft picks.
TTom
|
61.1648 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Fri Jan 20 1995 14:11 | 6 |
|
> Also, I've never seen what anybody sees in Miller.
He's not Vinny Testaverde?
Joe
|
61.1649 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Fri Jan 20 1995 15:39 | 10 |
|
Cleveland quote of the day:
Pete Franklin, long time radio sports talk show host, once based in
Cleveland, on Bill Belichick:
He's so cold you can stand in the same room with him and
catch pneumonia.
Joe
|
61.1650 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Mar 27 1995 08:57 | 31 |
61.1651 | Pats will have a better record count on it | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Mon Mar 27 1995 12:51 | 12 |
|
re -.1
> Can Vinnie get the ball to Rison?
In a word No.
HTH
Jerry
|
61.1652 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Mar 27 1995 22:31 | 8 |
61.1653 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | | Mon Mar 27 1995 22:51 | 7 |
|
>>So the Browns have no one to throw to the top receiver in the league
Why would they want to throw to Jerry Rice????
JaKe
|
61.1654 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Mar 28 1995 08:23 | 6 |
61.1655 | Pats 11-5 AFC East champs | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Tue Mar 28 1995 08:26 | 10 |
|
Paul...
I am the first to admit the Pats lost two to the 'Spots. No question
about it. I am stating that the Pats upside is greater than the 'Spots
and will finish higher this year and probably the next few years. Face
it the 'Spots had their chance last year and blew it.
Jerry
|
61.1656 | whatta ya expect? | HBAHBA::HAAS | recurring recusancy | Tue Mar 28 1995 13:07 | 11 |
| I don't know if'n you can say Cleveland blew it.
They got Vinnie at the helm and a_idiot for a coach. So it's hard to say
they shoulda won anything.
Now they've mortgaged their future on that haid case Rison which should
really start their slide into oblivion. You can bet your hat, ass and
overcoat that Rison'll be whining soon. He'll be crying about how his
stats are down, mostly cause Vinnie caint get the ball to him.
TTom
|
61.1657 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Mar 28 1995 14:21 | 14 |
| > Now they've mortgaged their future on that haid case Rison which should
> really start their slide into oblivion. You can bet your hat, ass and
> overcoat that Rison'll be whining soon. He'll be crying about how his
> stats are down, mostly cause Vinnie caint get the ball to him.
Huh? If they'd traded something significant for him, I'd agree.
They didn't - all he costs is $. Not that I would have signed
him, but still...
The bigger loss, IMHO, is Baldwin. Metcalf didn't really help the
team save as a return man. If Baldwin's around, Metcalf (as talented
as he is) is expendable. But Baldwin's gone...
Joe
|
61.1658 | salary cap dollars not available for others | HBAHBA::HAAS | recurring recusancy | Tue Mar 28 1995 14:56 | 12 |
| By that I meant in terms of the salary cap.
We've all seen how hard it has become to hold onto even good players
because of the cap. Dallas is a case in point. By giving all this money
to Rison, they have that much less to spend on other talent. They didn't
trade anyone for him but all the money going Rison's way will keep them
from getting some others.
And thanks for Baldwin. All of us down here in Charlotte are looking
forward to seeing him play.
TTom
|
61.1659 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | NOTFabio,& I don't play him on TV | Thu Jun 29 1995 12:53 | 6 |
| Brown(spot)s(tm) SUCK ETERNALLY!!!!!
Film at 11
JaKe
|
61.1660 | The excuses begin before Training camp opens | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Networks Sales & Marketing | Fri Jul 07 1995 12:19 | 17 |
| ESPNET SportsZone | NFL
Vinny's Secret
Pro Football Weekly
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brown QB Vinny Testaverde now says he had trouble throwing deep for
most of last season because of a separated shoulder suffered in October
1993 .Nobody really knew about it, Testaverde said. I never said anything
except briefly to (trainer) Bill Tessendorf. Not even the coaches knew. It
wasn't until the end of last season that I felt I could get the ball
downfield the way I wanted to. During the season, Testaverde completed
only five passes of 50 yards or more (one in the last 11 games) and six
of between 31 and 49 yards.
|
61.1661 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 21 1995 13:57 | 4 |
61.1662 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:37 | 16 |
| I hardly think Sox fans are front-runner fans. In fact, those two phrases in
the same sentence are probably the biggest oxymoron around.
All the fans I know have stuck with the team through thick and thin and there's
been lots more thick than thin.
I was lucky. My second season was the Dream Season of 1967, but my dad
followed them and the Boston Braves through lots more years and lots more lean
times. Nothin could be leaner in a contemporary lifetime than the Sox 50s and
early 60s, unless you were perhaps a Washington Senators fan or a Philadelphia
Athletics fan.
Course, my dad was alive the last time the Sox won a WS.
'Saw
|
61.1663 | "we luv ya anyway..." | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:47 | 12 |
| >I hardly think Sox fans are front-runner fans.
>All the fans I know have stuck with the team through thick and thin and there's
>been lots more thick than thin.
Though we're bitter rivals, I believe Red Sox fans are the most loyal
in all of sports. When you consider the lack of accomplishment, their
support is undying, unconditional, and truly amazing.
(the above IS a complement, BTW...)
|
61.1664 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:51 | 21 |
| >(the above IS a complement, BTW...)
Thanks, and is taken a such.
There's something to be said for all of that too. I can remember many, many
years when the Sox would be doing something fantastic in June, and my dad would
say to me "Look out, August is just around the corner."
If he was really in a bad mood, or if I'd gotten on his sh*t list, and we'd be
listening or watching a game together, he'd always take a shot at me about
Bucky Dent. ("Dirty pool, Dad, that's really dirty pool")
There's a cynicism you develop, but there's the loyalty and the attitude that
we develop of "*I* can say they suck, but you hadn't better say they suck"
Like I said, I think that only Senator or Athletics fans had it tougher....
'Saw
|
61.1665 | Browns to take it all. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:52 | 15 |
|
Just got my pre-season BNI mag the other day......It sounds like
the Browns are going to the big game this year....year 5 of the
contract. The Browns are boasting the best offensive line in the NFL
this year.....I think anyone can be the QB for the browns this year
and make good. Big question this year will be the defensive line and
special teams. Eric Turner is holding out for the big bucks like
Rison got. Lets hope he is not out for too long. Model says he won't
talk about the stadium till the end of the season. He doesn't want
to distract the team who is on a mission!.....the SUPER BOWL!
Go DAWGS!
WOOF!!!
|
61.1666 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jul 21 1995 15:00 | 6 |
|
A number of the preseason rags have been really high on the Browns,
but I just don't see it.
Joe (expecting 8-8 or 9-7, and still hoping for 0-however many it
takes to run Bellichek out of town)
|
61.1667 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 21 1995 15:45 | 7 |
61.1668 | You can never say that 'bout the sox | AD::HEATH | Tribe Rooools Sox Suck (again by the way) | Fri Jul 21 1995 16:02 | 14 |
|
re -.1
>> Okay... okay... Pats fans and fair-weather... those two words are
interchangeable.
As much as it pains me to say it but for the most part that is
true. I have always been a Pats fan and always will but for the most
part the Pats have only drawn well when they are on a roll.
Jerry
|
61.1669 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Fri Jul 21 1995 16:36 | 8 |
|
I'd venture to geuss that 60-70% of Pats season ticket holders do
not predate the hiring of Parcells. The crowd at games these days
looks nothing like the crowd that you used to see 10-15 years ago.
Though that's not a completely bad thing because now you see a lot
more women and kids and less rowdyism. But the move onto the Pats
bandwagon has been exceeded only by all those folks jumping on the
Indians' bandwagon with Groaner as their leader.
|
61.1670 | I doubt redsox fans would've supported likes of Indians | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 21 1995 16:57 | 14 |
| How would you know about the Redsox drawing if they weren't in
contention? The only draught they had was '92,'93 and '94 and even
then they managed thru some miracle to pretend to contend with the
likes of Billy Hatcher in centerfield.
Two division winners in the 80s and a division playoff berth lost on
the last weekend in the strike season of '81/'82. '80-85 was a
rebuilding period when the strong team was dismantled by Haywood but
even then there was some excitement and hope but also a dropoff in
attendance.
Yes, strong interest from 1967 to the present with no considerable
dropoff but no real challenge that the likes of a patriots or indians
could present.
|
61.1671 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Mon Jul 24 1995 10:02 | 18 |
| Bill,
I think you're leaving out the legacy aspect of Red Sox fandom.
I heard all the stories as a kid of the years before I was born. The stories
of the '46 World Series.
Plus, for me personally, I'd rather be in the cellar the whole time than come
close but not make it. I think a lot of the angst of Red Sox fandom is
produced by the years that they did well, came very close, but didn't make it.
That's almost rougher in some ways than having them in the cellar since April.
So, there HAVE been lean years since 1967. Most Sox fans, I'd bet, would view
it as a low period, punctuated by some peaks.
JMHO,
'Saw
|
61.1672 | Not much lean, 67-91 | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Jul 24 1995 10:21 | 14 |
| Well there was a long draught from 59-66 and attendance showed it
dropping from the perennial million/per of the 50s to a low in the
600s in mid-sixty.
The only lean time was 83-85 but the progression to contender was
obvious and momemtum wasn't lost.
Yeh, Redsox do consider anything not a division pennant a lean year but
in 72-74 they were in first late in the year, 77-80 they contended.
But yes, in the hearts and minds they were always there. Look at
Cleveland which had a whole generation grow up, go off to college, lead
normal lives without the Indians ever tantalizing them. No wonder they
go bonkers now.
|
61.1673 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Mon Jul 24 1995 10:25 | 15 |
| Plus, I think you have to consider all the folks all over New England who
aren't in this area and can't get to Fenway easily.
I'm thinking of the old codger in Maine, who would consider it a big event in
life to be in Fenway just once. Or the young kid in northern Vermont who's
never been there either.
I'll never forget my first time in Fenway. As a kid we didn't have a lot of
money for extras like that, and while my dad always wanted to take me, we did
end up going together when I was in the Fire Dept and we had a group trip.
What an experience.
So, I think it's more than just attendance....
|
61.1674 | Imagine being a fan of the LA Clippers | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Mon Jul 24 1995 10:42 | 18 |
| 'Saw, I have to agree with Bill on this one.
> Plus, for me personally, I'd rather be in the cellar the whole time than come
> close but not make it. I think a lot of the angst of Red Sox fandom is
> produced by the years that they did well, came very close, but didn't make it.
> That's almost rougher in some ways than having them in the cellar since April.
But for thirty straight years? I have to believe a tough loss is easier to
live with than the knowledge that your team is so abominably managed that it
may not contend in your lifetime, that when you go to the ballpark you are
certain to see poor baseball, and that no help is in sight. That's what being
an Indians fan has meant since the infamous Colavito deal.
It's also been the lot of the Chicago Cubs fan, of course, with one division
title since 1945, but they keep filling Wrigley with fans, just the same. If
anyone gets my vote for most loyal fans in baseball, that's it.
Steve
|
61.1675 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Mon Jul 24 1995 11:04 | 13 |
| Well, to each his own, I guess.
Is the heartbreak to a fan worse if the team is in the cellar than if the ball
goes through Buckner's legs?
I don't know one Red Sox fan who has ever said "Man, if that ball didn't go
through Buckner's legs..." or said "Wow, if Bucky hadn't hit that homer".
Cubs fans rank right up there with Sox fans in terms of angst, IMO.
'Saw
|
61.1676 | In a given season... | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR DTN 865-2944 | Mon Jul 24 1995 12:17 | 14 |
| Yeah, I'll buy that. Finishing in the cellar happens over the whole season,
it's a gradual ache, while a heartbreaking loss on a single play is a shock
to the system. It hurts like hell, probably more than finishing last, but
I'd still rather play in the World Series.
But finishing last forever is a different kind of hell, it's a permanent
badge of inferiority, and I'd rather lose in the 7th game of the World
Series EVERY YEAR than be a permanent doormat.
I know, Red Sox fans like to suffer in public. But they have it a whole
lot better than Cubs and Indians fans have had it, and Cubs fans have
been positively heroic.
Steve
|
61.1677 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jul 24 1995 13:51 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1675 by CAMONE::WAY "Software Mortician" >>>
>I don't know one Red Sox fan who has ever said "Man, if that ball didn't go
>through Buckner's legs..." or said "Wow, if Bucky hadn't hit that homer".
Of course if Buckner had caught that ball and Bucky had struck out most
likely the Sox would have lost those two games anyway. Maybe not but those two
plays were not game winners they were hyped to be by the press.
Personally I'd rather have my team come close from time to time than always be
in the cellar. Sooner or later even the BoSox bad luck will run out and they'll
win one of those Game 7s but if your always in the cellar about all you can talk
about is maybe being over .500 some year. Now that's dull.
George
|
61.1678 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Mon Jul 24 1995 14:06 | 10 |
| Well, I guess that's why some folks like goose liver and some folks don't 8^)
I suppose each situation has its own kind of angst.
And granted, those two particular plays I mentioned didn't soley determine the
outcome of the game. But there never was a more painful sight I'd bet than
the ball rolling between Billy Buck's legs....
'Saw
|
61.1679 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Jul 24 1995 14:09 | 7 |
61.1680 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Mon Jul 24 1995 14:59 | 10 |
|
>The Indians did NOT finish in last place 30 straight years. More
> fact creation.
Out of curiousity, does anyone know how many straight years the Indians
were at least 10 games out of first by seasons end? Wasn't that around
30 years or so?
Marc
|
61.1681 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jul 24 1995 15:04 | 6 |
| > Out of curiousity, does anyone know how many straight years the Indians
> were at least 10 games out of first by seasons end? Wasn't that around
> 30 years or so?
There's definitely something about 25+ games out in "so many seasons"
as being a record or something.
|
61.1682 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Mon Jul 24 1995 15:32 | 12 |
| In order for a team to lose a WS,a Super Bowl,a Stanley Cup or an NBA
title their has to be some outstanding highlights along the way that a
fan can enjoy even after the loss. The Sox 86 loss was awful but the
win in Game 5 with Henderson's HR had the fan's going nuts for a few
days. The Pats improbable run to the Super Bowl will be 3 weeks I'll
never forget. I can remember 5 Celtics championships but the 2 games
I'll probably remember most were Games 6 and 7 of the series they
played against the Sixers the year the C's won their first Bird-led
champeenship. I'll take rooting for the Red Sox instead of someone like
the Padres any time. Yeah they'll rip our hearts out once a decade but
if they ever won what else could we bitch and moan about? :^)
|
61.1683 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jul 24 1995 15:32 | 7 |
| >Is the heartbreak to a fan worse if the team is in the cellar than if the ball
>goes through Buckner's legs?
The heartbreak is worse (IMO) in those shocking losses in championship
play. But at least you've experienced the exhilaration of the chase.
To live at the bottom, never knowing the excitement of being in the
chase has to be a *dead* feeling.
|
61.1684 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jul 24 1995 16:20 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1678 by CAMONE::WAY "Software Mortician" >>>
>And granted, those two particular plays I mentioned didn't soley determine the
>outcome of the game. But there never was a more painful sight I'd bet than
>the ball rolling between Billy Buck's legs....
... the pitch before when Stanley and Gedman got crossed up, Mitchell scored,
with Vin Scully yelling "THE GAME IS TIED, THE GAME IS TIED".
That was the point where the Red Sox lost the World Series. That was the
point at which every experienced Red Sox fan knew that the tragedy was over
except for carry'en off the bodies.
George
|
61.1685 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Mon Jul 24 1995 16:58 | 21 |
| > ... the pitch before when Stanley and Gedman got crossed up, Mitchell scored,
>with Vin Scully yelling "THE GAME IS TIED, THE GAME IS TIED".
No doubt. No doubt at all. Yet most Red Sox fans remember Billy Buck FIRST,
and then Stanley throwing the wild pitch that Squints Gedman couldn't find.
re the "dead" feeling. I don't know about that. Today perhaps. But the times
like the Philadelphia Athletics and the Washington Senators had good fan bases
despite the poor performances of the teams. I think the fans looked to
different things when their teams were so abyssmal, like perhaps one player
doing exceptionally well.
Of cousre I'd rather a team contend once in a while, but man is it tough when
you lose the big ones....
'Saw
|
61.1686 | Vardell is back! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Wed Jul 26 1995 12:17 | 8 |
|
Just saw in the paper the other day that Tommy Vardell has come off
the unable to perform list and Leroy Hoard went on the unable to
perform list. Any ideas why Hoard went down???
WOOF!
|
61.1687 | Just Wondering | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Jul 26 1995 13:40 | 15 |
| A question for Paul, Hal, Joe, or other Browns fans.
I'm as you know, a Broncos not a Browns fan. But as it turned out last year
I was able to watch more Browns then Broncos games out here on the East Coast.
My question is this. I was terribly impressed by Tommy "TD" Brown. However,
it didn't seem like they ran much offense for him, yet the man always seemed
to get yardage and/or points when they got the ball to him. Did you Browns
fans think he was underutilized?
Good news about him being back. I like him as a player despite his team. On
the same aspect, I'm sorry to hear about Hoard. Hope he's back soon to take
his lumps from my Broncos!
zamboni
|
61.1688 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Jul 26 1995 14:15 | 8 |
|
I assume you're talking about Tommy "TD" Vardell...
He was injured fairly early on last year; up until that point,
he did seem somewhat underutilized, but he wasn't available for
long enough to really say.
Joe
|
61.1689 | Ironhead > Touchdown Tommy | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Jul 26 1995 15:24 | 1 |
|
|
61.1690 | Chris Everett > Vinny | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Jul 26 1995 15:25 | 1 |
|
|
61.1691 | Mathis > Rison | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Jul 26 1995 15:25 | 1 |
|
|
61.1692 | Sparks > Turner | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Jul 26 1995 15:26 | 1 |
|
|
61.1693 | JB Crews > Hal | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Jul 26 1995 15:27 | 1 |
|
|
61.1694 | Belichick > Reeves | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Jul 26 1995 15:28 | 1 |
|
|
61.1695 | Steelers > Browns | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Jul 27 1995 18:11 | 0 |
61.1696 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Thu Jul 27 1995 19:11 | 3 |
61.1697 | Take it to the bank | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jul 28 1995 16:31 | 5 |
| As long a Vinnie Interceptiverde is throwin the ball and as long as
Billy Chick is the coach and as long as Art MoDumbbell is the owner,
the Men of Steel will reign supreme in the AFC Central.
Keith
|
61.1698 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Fri Jul 28 1995 17:17 | 4 |
|
You'd better tm those babies Keith!
Claybone
|
61.1699 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Fri Jul 28 1995 17:36 | 4 |
61.1700 | Move em' Art | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Networks Sales & Marketing | Fri Jul 28 1995 17:57 | 6 |
| snarf on the 1700
wich is incidently the same # of assistant coaches for cleveland thised
year.
Jeff
|
61.1701 | Black n Gold, colors to be proud of. | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jul 28 1995 18:23 | 6 |
| > Sounds like a pname wager is necessary.
This is like takin candy from babies. OK, yer on. We cain work out the
details the week before the first Steeler/'Spot matchup.
Keith
|
61.1702 | 60% of the offense on a cheap HR from a banjo hitter ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Aug 02 1995 11:27 | 15 |
|
> Of course if Buckner had caught that ball and Bucky had struck out most
> likely the Sox would have lost those two games anyway. Maybe not but those two
> plays were not game winners they were hyped to be by the press.
Just read this (what's this doing in the Browns' note?-- oh yeah, we're
talking futility), and couldn't let it pass. I've heard your arguments
on Buckner before, George, but w.r.t Bucky Dent, there can be no "hype"
associated with a 3-run homer in a 1-run ballgame, a 5-4 game at that.
If you consider the frequency of the 3-run homer (with the slam being
relatively rare), it's the most destructive offensive play in baseball,
like Earl Weaver used to preach.
glenn
|
61.1703 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Aug 02 1995 16:00 | 3 |
| Didn't Reggie hit another hommer later in the game?
George
|
61.1704 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Aug 02 1995 16:07 | 4 |
| > Didn't Reggie hit another hommer later in the game?
Yes, the deciding run (towering shot near the flagpole)...always forgotten
in the lament over Dent's HR.
|
61.1705 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same | Mon Aug 07 1995 23:45 | 5 |
61.1706 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Aug 08 1995 11:22 | 1 |
61.1707 | noting by proxy | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Aug 08 1995 13:22 | 20 |
| Hot off the press....
Browns have inked Jim "Blind Melon" McMahon to a one year deal.
JaKe says this secures the Steelers as a lock for the AFC Central.
for Groaner:
JaKe wants to know if you will accept a p-name bet with him.
If you loose you must use it for every note you enter until
he comes back to Digital. If he looses, he'll use the p-name
of your choice for every note he enters in ::sprots.
Jake figures between Groaner and Hal one, or both, will be dumb
enough to take him up on it.
billl
|
61.1708 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Aug 08 1995 14:00 | 5 |
| Since the Superbowl against the Pats 10 years ago how many seasons has
McMahon been the starting quarterback for a team and not sat out a significant
portion of the season due to injuries?
George
|
61.1709 | not lately | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Aug 08 1995 15:22 | 6 |
| Almost never, he's been the designated backup and either injury or
poor performance boosts him to the starting spot. I doubt his injury
record the last 5 years is any worse than anyone else. I know the
Eagles seemed to do better with him that Randall.
From '86-87 to 90, yes he was pretty much hors de combat.
|
61.1710 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Fri Aug 11 1995 10:02 | 16 |
| A vewy, vewy reliable source has informed me that Vinnie
Interceptiverde was hospitalized recently. The team
would divulge no info other than he was suffering from a
severe allergic reaction.
My source has spoken to a hospital official, that wished to
remain nameless. Said official has stated that Vinnie's
normally treatable reaction, which has now taken a much
more severe turn, is his allergy to the game of football.
Either that or "Blind Melon Chitlen" McMahon slipped him
a 'mickey'.
billl
|
61.1711 | allergic to competition? | HBAHBA::HAAS | wake & bake | Fri Aug 11 1995 11:19 | 5 |
| Based on Zeier's performance in the lasted game and the signing of
McMahon, perchance ol' Vinny had a reaction to the fack that he may be
the third best QB in Cleveland...
TTom
|
61.1712 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Aug 11 1995 11:24 | 8 |
|
You know, I didn't get to see much of the CLE-NYG game, but what I
did get to see was a bit of Zeier at QB, and I like the kid. He's
supposed to start the game this weekend; if he somehow manages to
play significantly this season, I'll be much more fond of the Browns
chances, even if Belichek is still a dink.
Joe
|
61.1713 | If'n Zieier has erased those awful BC memories | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Aug 11 1995 11:33 | 3 |
| As long as he can avoid Philadelphia and the sight of Mike Mamula
bearing down on him as in Aloha means goodbye. He may want to avoid
Detroit and Mr Boyd too.
|
61.1714 | Kansas, not Georgia | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Fri Aug 11 1995 11:41 | 4 |
| I think it was Chad May who should be having nightmares
over the BC pass rush from the Aloha Bowl.
Mike
|
61.1715 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Aug 11 1995 12:11 | 5 |
| > As long as he can avoid Philadelphia and the sight of Mike Mamula
> bearing down on him as in Aloha means goodbye. He may want to avoid
> Detroit and Mr Boyd too.
Bill, you're thinking of Chad May. Eric Zeier was Georgia's QB.
|
61.1716 | Dawgs spanked the Cards 32-0 with Mac at QB | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Aug 11 1995 12:40 | 2 |
61.1717 | oops | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Aug 11 1995 12:59 | 1 |
| I stand corrected. How's May doing?
|
61.1718 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox DOMINATE Indians, heavily favored to win Pennant! | Fri Aug 11 1995 16:05 | 4 |
61.1719 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Tribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meet | Tue Aug 15 1995 08:14 | 18 |
61.1720 | line 2-1 on a HalShow today | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Aug 15 1995 09:10 | 13 |
|
Hey Vinny how's your tummy??????????
I don't know Paul, Bledsoe and Mirer both started as rookies, Zeier
might too.
I'm really going to have to hook up the radio to listen to monday
nite games, the boys in the booth suck. I mean a guy completes a
10 yard pass something an 8 year old can do for christsakes and these
guys carry on like he just wrote "Great Expectations" or carried
a 3.9 gpa for 4 years......
mike
|
61.1721 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Tue Aug 15 1995 09:19 | 8 |
| Icemanus, how about Chicago having there training camp in
Milwaukee????
Browns looked tremendous, Bears looked like the Hudson Pop Warner
Bears. I was singing Air Zeir's praises for years, I'm glad he's
getting a good look......
Jimbo
|
61.1722 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Tribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meet | Tue Aug 15 1995 09:22 | 7 |
61.1723 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Aug 15 1995 09:26 | 8 |
|
I don't know.
I'm no longer convinced that Zeier _won't_ start, and am convinced
that he _should_ start, at least for now. He reminds me of a young
Kosar, which is nice to see, and a _wonderful_ change from Testaverde.
Joe
|
61.1724 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 15 1995 09:35 | 23 |
| > I don't know who this Zeir guy is that Jimbo is talking mumbling
> something about (haven't seen any of the praise in here),
It's not a "who", it's a "what". It's a big country in Africa... :-)
> but
> this guy Zeier who plays for the Browns will not start at QB
> this year unless Vinnie goes down. Browns have a solid shot at
> the Super Bowl, but no body makes it with a rookie QB.
Having seen him in college and having watched him last night, if I were
a Browns fan, I'd *still* rather him at QB. If there's a team that could
survive with a rookie QB, it's the Browns - good defense, strong running
attack. A lot of rookie mistakes come in dissecting pass coverages - he
won't have to do that as much with a team that can run.
The guy was, what, 14-16 for 168, 1 TD passing, 1 TD rushing? Even in
preseason against the Bears, that's still eyeopening...
Zeier may not get them to the Super Bowl, but Testaverde *definitely* won't.
Might as well roll the bones on the guy with the talent...
Roland
|
61.1725 | "Athletic" without great tools, just a player... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Aug 15 1995 10:31 | 10 |
|
Zeier proved to me what he was made of in that game last year where
Georgia came back from a big deficit in the second half to tie Auburn.
He and those 'Dawgs were taking a pounding in the first half at the
hands of a much superior team but didn't quit. I didn't know if he had
quite enough ability to be a real star in the NFL, but as opposed to a
Testaverde at least you know that there's a heart in that body...
glenn
|
61.1726 | early ROY | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Tue Aug 15 1995 10:41 | 14 |
| > ... He reminds me of a young
Kosar, ...
Talk about danged with faint praise!
Seriously, Zeier is by far the bestest looking rookie thised year.
I predict that he'll give Vinny a_allergy in the butt from sitting on the
pine.
With Zeier at the QB, anything less than a_AFC crown would be
disappointing and, ipso facto, ipse dixit, ergo, a choke job, hence.
TTom
|
61.1727 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Reasonable summer rates | Tue Aug 15 1995 11:08 | 16 |
| As much as it hurts me to say it, I may be following the Cleveland
bandwagon this year. I tend to follow teams that have a person that I
am familiar with (Terp QB's - Boomer with Cinci and the Jets, Reich
with Buffalo and now the Panthers, O'Donnell with the Steelers). Now
with Zeier on the Dawgs I may have to follow the local boy (I'm no fan
of GA but I can't pick up a paper or listen to the FAN withour hearing
about him). A caller on the FAN actually predicted a Cleveland SB win
with Zeier at the helm (he also said that GA would win the MNC this
year, so I guess he was hittin' the ol' distilled grain a little
earlier than usual!).
Dawgs play the Falcons this week. Should be interesting, as you may
more people rooing for Cleveland in the stands! College loyalty tends
to run deeper than pro team adoration around here.
UMDan
|
61.1728 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | What ever happened to Bob Steele? | Tue Aug 15 1995 11:12 | 4 |
| re 1720
They flew to Milwaukee for training camp.
|
61.1729 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Aug 15 1995 11:48 | 5 |
|
Any chance we'll see a "Whoops, my mistake" from Groaner?
Kevin
|
61.1730 | Deirdork is still a brainless twit! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Tribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meet | Tue Aug 15 1995 11:49 | 5 |
61.1731 | hope this helps... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 15 1995 11:56 | 7 |
| > Dan Dierdork, proved why he was a dork when he commented that the
> flight back to Milwaukee would be no fun if they continued their
> poor play - this was in the first half. Um Dan, Chicago is in
> Illinois, not Milwaukee.
You were right about Dierdorf being a moron, but in this particular
case he was correct.
|
61.1732 | still a dork | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Tue Aug 15 1995 11:58 | 5 |
| > Any chance we'll see a "Whoops, my mistake" from Groaner?
Just cause he missed this detail doesn't mean the Dierdork is not a dork.
TTom
|
61.1733 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Aug 15 1995 12:00 | 7 |
|
Didn't NEED to, I was just wondering if'n you'd admit that you didn't
know what you were talking about (assuming the Bears would be flying
to Chicago instead going back to training camp).
Kevin
|
61.1734 | Dan's ok in my book, not great, but ok | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Aug 15 1995 12:06 | 8 |
|
By the way, I must really be in the minority because I think Dan's
ok. Monday night football is entertainment and sports. Dan may be
a little light on the technical analysis, but that's only part of why
he's there.
Kevin
|
61.1735 | amazing | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Tue Aug 15 1995 12:15 | 26 |
| I am continuously amazed at how bad most announcers are.
Dan is not the worst. In fack, I don't think he's even the worst on MNF.
Al Michaels wins hands. Michaels has no clue what is happening on the
field and feels obliged to remind us of that, over and over. And Frank
Gifford can barely keep up with who's actually playing. Not the players,
the teams.
And now, with this new season, we have Phil Simms. I heard of enough of
him on the ESPN pre-game lasted season to know to tune him out.
And of course, Simms is following in the grand tradition of Joe Theisman
who has a_uncanny way of talking long enought about any play so that he
missed the nexted one. And I feel confident, based on his comments, the
he never made a single mistake on the football field, ever. Yeah, Joe, so
many people think so much of you that none of your teammates visited you
after LT finished with your leg.
Locally, they hired some guy from Buffalo who obviously sucked up to
Panther GM Bill Polian. He's barely adequate about football, hardly a
basis for his selection as the color analyst. What's even more funny is
when he tries to do local sports like NASCAR, which he has obviously
never watched, and college basketball where one wonders if'n he knows
how many people are supposed to be on a team.
TTom
|
61.1736 | haw haw | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Aug 15 1995 12:42 | 5 |
61.1737 | hey, you, stay off've my bandwagon | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Tue Aug 15 1995 14:13 | 7 |
| Hey, don't bad mouth my bandwagon.
Besides, you'll probably jump aboard about week 10 by which time Buddy
will have rooned the Cards for another season and there's no more Sir
Chuck or KJ fodder.
TTom
|
61.1738 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Aug 15 1995 16:46 | 1 |
61.1739 | amen | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Wed Aug 16 1995 14:22 | 9 |
| Supposedly, Vinny is on the mend and he'll be back. Zaire will start
again thised week for Cleveburgh.
The word is, if'n there's no setbacks, Vinny will return for the game
agin the Cards on 8/25.
Let's all bow our haids and pray for setbacks.
TTom
|
61.1740 | no place for wimps | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Aug 16 1995 15:14 | 2 |
61.1741 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Tribe owns Yanks... bye in playoffs if they meet | Wed Aug 16 1995 20:08 | 9 |
61.1742 | The Browns are #1! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Thu Aug 17 1995 16:01 | 71 |
|
***************************************************************************
_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/
_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/
***************************************************************************
____/\
/- |
/-------/ |
\/\/\/\/| \
/
/\^^^^^^
\_______________
C L E V E L A N D
*****************************************************************************
Great game Monday by our beloved CLEVELAND BROWNS. The running
game looked great and the passing game was even better. Now, is there
a better receiving corps out there this year.....RISON, JACKSON &
LANGHAM. 1 2 3 . We're going to the big game this year!
Just a few side notes that I notice no one has said anything
about... Anyone notice Perry's replacement? PUPUA! And the guy
gets Perry's number. Think someone had something to do with that?
Well, I do!
Prior to Mondays game I was watching ESPN's pre game show and I
can't think of the guys name, but, Cleveland just signed this guy
who says he was blackballed by the NFL last year because of his great
hits. From the story they tell, this guy played not last year, but
the year before and was fined something like $10,000.00 for a couple
of hits he made on receivers...neither really looked that bad to me.
At the end of the year, he is waived and no one...I mean no one wanted
to pick him up. He says ... blackballed! So does ESPN. At any rate,
Cleveland has just signed this guy for the league miminum of something
like $360,000.00. Looks like the replacement for Turner untill he
shows up for camp and signs a new contract.
Beware, THE DAWGS are healthy this year.
Vardell isn't expected to contribute to the team untill mid season.
Look for White to fill in till Vardell is ready. White(hair) didn't
look too bad Monday either.
Reports are that Modell is looking to the suburbs for a new
stadium....???
Yes, Zeier does look good. He appears to be a little short but
the ENERGY he seems to bring to the team is what makes Testiturd look
so bad. Lets hope that infection in his leg ...... spreads!
HEHEHEHEHEHEH
I said spread!
At any rate...I have my tickets to the home opener...
The Pats sip!
Go Cleveland!
WOOF!
|
61.1743 | Get well quick Vinny | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Aug 17 1995 16:09 | 4 |
|
Chuck Cecil is the guy Hal and 30K was the amount of the fine......
mike
|
61.1744 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Thu Aug 17 1995 16:10 | 10 |
| > Prior to Mondays game I was watching ESPN's pre game show and I
> can't think of the guys name, but, Cleveland just signed this guy
> who says he was blackballed by the NFL last year because of his great
> hits. From the story they tell, this guy played not last year, but
> the year before and was fined something like $10,000.00 for a couple
> of hits he made on receivers...neither really looked that bad to me.
Amazingly enough, Hal, I understand what you're saying for once, and I
think the guy you're talking about is Chuck Cecil. I think he got hosed
big-time...
|
61.1745 | I don't think so... | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Aug 17 1995 16:25 | 3 |
| > -< Get well quick Vinny >-
Can Cle win with this guy at QB ?
|
61.1746 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Thu Aug 17 1995 17:38 | 2 |
61.1747 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyolgist | Thu Aug 17 1995 17:42 | 3 |
|
Because they have to play Pittsburg three times a year before they can
get to the big dance.
|
61.1748 | forget man-to-man coverage | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Aug 17 1995 17:43 | 1 |
61.1749 | Vinny is a woman | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | | Thu Aug 17 1995 19:54 | 10 |
|
Can't win with Vinny because he slipped and twisted his
(insert favorite female part)!
Sharkski
|
61.1750 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Fri Aug 18 1995 07:52 | 7 |
61.1751 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Fri Aug 18 1995 09:25 | 5 |
|
It's like this Paul, see that rock over there??? Well that rock over
there is smarter than Vinny..........
mike
|
61.1752 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Aug 18 1995 09:45 | 21 |
|
> So Cleveland can't win with Vinnie, but no one has been able to give me
> a reason why?
OK...
Here's why the Browns can't win (well, the Superbowl, at least) with
Vinny at QB:
Vinny Testaverde has about 1 good game for every four he plays.
He also has about 2 bad games for every four he plays.
In the playoffs, a bad game is almost certainly a loss; assume a
good game = a win, and a neutral game is a 50-50 chance.
That gives a 1.6% chance of three good games (thus a SB win), and
a 1.4% chance of a combination of good & neutral games with all
games being wins. So it's not that they can't win with Vinny at
QB, I guess - just that it's a 3 in 100 shot.
Joe
|
61.1753 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:07 | 19 |
| > So Cleveland can't win with Vinnie, but no one has been able to give me
> a reason why?
Joe went with probabilities, I'll go with admittedly subjective observation.
Last year's playoff game against the Patriots was not only the best that I've
even seen him play, but also the first time that I've ever seen him play
decently in a crucial game. (He is solely responsible for moving Shane Conlan
several spots up in the draft.)
His arm isn't what it used to be - he doesn't throw deep as well as he used to.
And even if it was still all there, he still doesn't make the smart choices on
passing plays that would allow him to fully utilize it.
I won't use the term "gutless" that others seem to use, because I have no
idea how I'd react if I had 300-pound guys coming to hit me, but he still
seems to get somewhat frazzled and rush things.
Do you consider these to be valid reasons?
|
61.1754 | Go Vinny! pleeez! | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Fri Aug 18 1995 10:52 | 11 |
| > So Cleveland can't win with Vinnie, but no one has been able to give me
> a reason why?
Yours not to wonder why ...
Why is much less important than what, as it what has happened.
What has happened is that Vinny has not produced. Cleveland underachieved
with this guy at the helm.
TTom
|
61.1755 | Steeler's > 'Spots | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Aug 18 1995 11:13 | 6 |
| > So Cleveland can't win with Vinnie, but no one has been able to give me
> a reason why?
Rod Woodson.
Keith
|
61.1756 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Fri Aug 18 1995 17:57 | 3 |
|
What has Woodson done v.s. the Browns?
|
61.1757 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Aug 18 1995 19:10 | 15 |
| > What has Woodson done v.s. the Browns?
Woodson was a one man wrecking crew when the Men of Steel
flattened the girls from Clevescum 3 times lasted year. He had multiple
INTs of Vinnie's passes, sacked Vinnie and forced some fumbles. Vinnie
wus so scared of Rod that he started throwin into double coverage on the
other side and even Tim Mckyer picked him off. How many INTs did Vinnie
throw against the Black n Gold last year ? Hint, if those games were
superbowls, Vinnie mightta broke John Elway's career superbowl INT record.
There's 10 other good reason's why the Steeler's will pulverize the
Brownies this year. They are: Greg Lloyd, Joel Steed, Kevin Green,
Chad Brown....well, you get the picture.
Keith
|
61.1758 | | PUSH::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Sat Aug 19 1995 08:24 | 3 |
|
Has Woodson ever won an NFL championship?
|
61.1759 | my cents worth | BSS::MENDEZ | | Mon Aug 21 1995 15:46 | 3 |
| no but McKyer has...
|
61.1760 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 22 1995 07:59 | 4 |
61.1761 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 22 1995 08:00 | 5 |
61.1762 | He's sooooo good | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | Oh flight attendent! | Wed Aug 23 1995 04:32 | 4 |
| Once again I must take my hat off to you groaner, You figured it out
all by yourself.
Lil Ed
|
61.1763 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Sun Aug 27 1995 09:08 | 14 |
61.1764 | Zeier will be the starter by Nov. | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Mon Aug 28 1995 08:35 | 13 |
|
re -.1
(Bledsoe would be down to #3 on the Browns depth charts
Paul.... I know your trying to bust peoples aggies but this is
absolutely crazy. With Bledsoe as the 'Spots QB they beat Pittsburgh
last year and end up in the 'Bowl.
Jerry
|
61.1765 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Mon Aug 28 1995 08:39 | 11 |
61.1766 | Pname mano-mano | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Mon Aug 28 1995 12:53 | 5 |
|
You willing to give me 17. Not that the Pats are gonna need them.
|
61.1767 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Mon Aug 28 1995 13:50 | 4 |
61.1768 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Aug 28 1995 14:16 | 2 |
61.1769 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Mon Aug 28 1995 16:07 | 8 |
61.1770 | wantin to go no points | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Mon Aug 28 1995 16:16 | 12 |
|
Paul.....
I will go even in a NY minute. Your the one the talkin about a 17
point blowout. I just wanted to see if you where willing to back a
claim like that up. Only prediction I will make is that the 'Spot O
isn't capable of putting up 30 points and thats what it will take to
win.
Jerry
|
61.1771 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Mon Aug 28 1995 16:47 | 3 |
61.1772 | don't assume too much | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Aug 28 1995 16:49 | 2 |
61.1773 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Aug 29 1995 10:25 | 7 |
| Mike,
Is that what's called "hitting the nail on the head"?
billl
|
61.1774 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:02 | 16 |
61.1775 | official bandwangoneer | HBAHBA::HAAS | lifepath perturbance | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:13 | 9 |
| > Browns will go 10-6 or 11-5.
> Browns will win the AFC Central.
> Browns will make it to the AFC Championship game.
And then?
I gotsta know. I got 'em to go all the way.
TTom
|
61.1776 | "Will I see you in January?" | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:29 | 23 |
| Preseason predictions -
> Browns will go 10-6 or 11-5.
Probably right
> Browns will win the AFC Central.
wrong-o, see below
> Browns will make it to the AFC Championship game.
wrong again, see below
> Ernest Hunter will surprise the league at RB.
anything positive from a Browns offense would be a
suprise.
> Pittsburgh will eek out a wild card bid.
The Steelers will win the division walking away.
The Browns will go down to the last week trying to
get the last available playoff spot, only to be beaten
in the wild card game, if they make it.
billl
|
61.1777 | Pats will win by 10-12 | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:41 | 15 |
|
Pats will beat the 'Spots on Sunday. Take it to the bank. It all
came clear last night when that moron Chirs Mortenson pick the 'Spots
for da 'bowl. All I've heard was how Andre Rison is goin to light it
up in the mistake by the lake but what the Dawg fans fail to relize is
that unless BillB puts in Zeier as the starter now (I think he is
better than Intecpetiverde now) he won't be seein much of the ball
'cause Vinny ain't gonna get it to him. Pittsburgh (as much as I
dislike those guys) should and will romp through that pathetic div.
Only two teams will be over .500, Squeelers and 'Spots.
Jerry
|
61.1778 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:52 | 5 |
| We'll see how 'pathetic' the division is when the Steelers
woop the Pats on Dec 16.
billl
|
61.1779 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Tue Aug 29 1995 13:03 | 10 |
| Lots of folks have picked the Pats to win the AFC East.
I think they're a year, perhaps two, away from all that. I see the Dolphins
winning the AFC East.
Browns/Steelers to me is a toss-up. The Browns need a decent QB. Vinny
will never take them to the promised land, IMO.
'Saw
|
61.1780 | destined to fail | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Aug 29 1995 13:33 | 2 |
61.1781 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Aug 29 1995 14:22 | 6 |
|
> The Browns need a decent QB.
They have one - Zeier.
Joe
|
61.1782 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 14:26 | 7 |
| >> The Browns need a decent QB.
> They have one - Zeier.
The problem here is that your name is not Bill Belichick.
Not that you necessarily want it to be...
|
61.1783 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Tue Aug 29 1995 14:41 | 7 |
|
From a Patriots fan, the Pats will start the season off 0-3. They
will lose to Cleveland, Miami, and SF. Cleveland has a strong team
on will win the Central Division. I see Miami and SF playing against
each other in the Super Bowl. With Dan Marino finally geting a ring.
Ron
|
61.1784 | my 2 cents | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Aug 29 1995 16:23 | 7 |
| If the Browns have to rely on Zeier they will be in trouble. Rarely
will a rookie make it big in the NFL especially at QB. Down the road
Zeier could be a very good one. Vinnie ought to be able to take the
Browns to the playoffs and contend for the division. It is speculative
whether he has the talent to take them to the big dance. Cleveland
has a solid defense but QB is a BIG ?
|
61.1785 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 29 1995 17:21 | 4 |
61.1786 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 29 1995 17:25 | 2 |
61.1787 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Tue Aug 29 1995 17:31 | 2 |
|
How can they be a rookie in the second game? Must be Otto Graham
|
61.1788 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Aug 29 1995 17:50 | 7 |
| Groaner,
name it, you got.
billl
|
61.1789 | Testaverde must still be a rookie | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Aug 29 1995 18:40 | 4 |
61.1790 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 29 1995 18:56 | 10 |
61.1791 | duh! | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Aug 29 1995 19:29 | 4 |
61.1792 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Tue Aug 29 1995 22:54 | 9 |
61.1793 | True story.... | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Wed Aug 30 1995 10:01 | 13 |
| Hey, what's wrong with flash cards?
That's the way I learned some algebra, and quite a bit of chemistry. I'd
make them up and then have my brother work with me on them. He didn't
know sh*t from shinola about what I was doing, but he could tell if my
answer was right.....
Flash cards rool!
8^)
'Saw
|
61.1794 | let the p-name wagers begin! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Aug 30 1995 10:54 | 13 |
| Okay Groaner, it's time to put up or shutup.
If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the division you must
wear "I've always been a closet Steeler fan" until the Monday
following the Super Bowl.
If'n the Browns clinch (fat chance) I'll do the same.
Knowing your traditional disappearing act happens as soon as
the Browns are out of it, this shouldn't be too painful for you.
billl
|
61.1795 | rookie defined | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Aug 30 1995 13:00 | 6 |
61.1796 | The case of the gullible professor | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Aug 30 1995 13:21 | 9 |
| 'Saw,
In my high school chemistry the teacher had the table of elements
on a pull-down chart above the blackboard - just sitting there.
Now it wasn't totally obvious how to use it and I'm not sure
everyone caught on - I never told anyone - but...
Of course I didn't need it, I had all those valences and
abbreviations etc memorized.
|
61.1797 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Wed Aug 30 1995 13:44 | 19 |
| > In my high school chemistry the teacher had the table of elements
> on a pull-down chart above the blackboard - just sitting there.
>
> Now it wasn't totally obvious how to use it and I'm not sure
> everyone caught on - I never told anyone - but...
Yep, I remember those days. I could never remember that Au was gold
until someone told me that Au was short for Aurum, the Latin word (supposedly)
for gold....
> Of course I didn't need it, I had all those valences and
> abbreviations etc memorized.
Good for you. I just memorized the regular ones I needed for class....
'Saw
|
61.1798 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Aug 30 1995 14:08 | 7 |
| Hard to belive I haven't heard back from Groaner on that p-name wager.
He must either be busy, or he's lost his cajones.
billl
|
61.1799 | noting by proxy | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Aug 30 1995 16:58 | 11 |
| Testicleverde/Belicheck/Modell factor will allow the Brownspots
to finish no better than 9-7, with an outside chance at 10-6.
Meanwhile the STEELERS will finish no worse than 11-5.
Look for the 'spots to loose three more games to the STEELERS.
Ya heerd it here firsted!
JaKe
|
61.1800 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Aug 30 1995 17:06 | 2 |
61.1801 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NUMBER 3 LOOMS OVER FENWAY | Wed Aug 30 1995 17:09 | 5 |
|
Plus 2 from Cincy they are already 6-0.
If they don't go 12-4 its a choke!
|
61.1802 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Aug 30 1995 17:24 | 2 |
61.1803 | Okay, i'm in | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | This is year 77 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding plan | Wed Aug 30 1995 17:36 | 20 |
61.1804 | ?? | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Aug 30 1995 18:39 | 26 |
| <<< Note 61.1794 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all..." >>>
> -< let the p-name wagers begin! >-
>
> Okay Groaner, it's time to put up or shutup.
>
> If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the division you must
> wear "I've always been a closet Steeler fan" until the Monday
> following the Super Bowl.
>
> If'n the Browns clinch (fat chance) I'll do the same.
>
> Knowing your traditional disappearing act happens as soon as
> the Browns are out of it, this shouldn't be too painful for you.
>
>
> billl
Billl,
Does this mean that if'n the Browns clinch, you'll sport a P name of
"I've always been a closet Steeler fan"? I'd say strict interpretation
of your words suggests that. You wouldn't be trying something funny
here now would you?
Kevin
|
61.1805 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Thu Aug 31 1995 10:14 | 11 |
| Kevin,
I ain't no Clevescumite! I would never do something as
dastardly as that. ;^)
I actually noticed that after I posted it, but knew there
was no way I could stand the abuse I would take in here
if I was to welch on the intent of a p-name bet.
billl
|
61.1806 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Thu Aug 31 1995 11:14 | 5 |
|
Jest checkin'....
Kevin
|
61.1807 | Pats 96 SB Champs | FABSIX::K_JOHNSON | | Tue Sep 05 1995 00:12 | 9 |
| Now that the Brownies lost to a good team,now they can beat
up on that hopeless division (except Pitts.).Bownies are #1.....
Ha Ha What a Choke!!
|
61.1808 | NE favored to win and they won | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats rule Browns! | Tue Sep 05 1995 07:52 | 4 |
61.1809 | someone call the net-police! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Sep 05 1995 09:48 | 7 |
| Someone must have broken into Groaner's account. No way he'd be
posting in here so soon after being beaten by a 'mediocoe' team
like the Pats.
billl
|
61.1810 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats rule Browns! | Tue Sep 05 1995 11:19 | 5 |
61.1811 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Sep 05 1995 11:43 | 8 |
| >>If the Browns were in NE's division, they'd probably be in first place right now.
Nice Hal-ism there, Groaner. If the Browns were in the Pat's division,
they'd be in LAST place there, too.
billl
|
61.1812 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Tue Sep 05 1995 12:41 | 3 |
| This note stream is kind of like reading one of the "formula" novels.
You know how it's going to go even before you open the book....
|
61.1813 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Sep 05 1995 13:16 | 7 |
61.1814 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Tue Sep 05 1995 13:23 | 4 |
|
If it's the best division in the league. Why haven't they won a SB
since 1974?
|
61.1815 | duh | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Sep 05 1995 13:25 | 1 |
61.1816 | duh duh | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Tue Sep 05 1995 13:45 | 3 |
|
I should have known another heiserism
|
61.1817 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats rule Browns! | Tue Sep 05 1995 16:44 | 5 |
61.1818 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Sep 05 1995 16:49 | 8 |
| Groaner,
What was the game you played to simulate the Browns/Pats game? Was it a
video game, or was it a statistical game with room for variance like
Strat-O-Matic? It came out pretty close to the real thing.
Roland
|
61.1819 | pats win?? | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Tue Sep 05 1995 16:57 | 1 |
|
|
61.1820 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:01 | 5 |
|
Not sure where his original note was, but Paul played two games before
Sunday - one was a 17-16 Cleveland win, but after he discovered he'd played
it at Cleveland, he re-ran it, and ended up with a 17-17 tie. Considering
that the final score was 17-14, it wasn't off by much.
|
61.1821 | Yea like the Dolts are for real | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:01 | 10 |
|
Paul...
I'll agree that the Brown have played the toughest schedule in the
NFL so far but the AFC central is a laughing stock. Two very good
teams and a bunch of panzies.
Jerry
|
61.1822 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:02 | 7 |
|
The Browns are in the strongest dvision in the AFC right now?
C'mon, Paul. After Cleveland and Pittsburg, two very good teams,
you have Cinci, Houston and Jacksonville. I'd say that the west
with Denver, KC, Oakland, San Diego and Seattle kicks the Central's
butt and the East with NE, Miami and Buffalo is a little bit behind
them. The AFC Central is the *weakest* division in the AFC.
|
61.1823 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:05 | 1 |
61.1824 | Huh? | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:07 | 14 |
| > <<< Note 61.1817 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Pats rule Browns!" >>>
>
>
> Two key things to remember about the Browns loss and their division:
>
> 1. The Browns are in the strongest division in the AFC right now.
>
> 2. The Browns played a much tougher schedule than the Pats so far.
What are you talking about in point 2? The Pats are a tougher oppenent
than the Browns? Or are you talking about the meaningless pre-season
schedule?
Kevin
|
61.1825 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | When will the Tribe Choke? | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:09 | 4 |
|
Groaners P-Name speaks for all of his crap.
Ron
|
61.1826 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:11 | 10 |
| >> 2. The Browns played a much tougher schedule than the Pats so far.
> What are you talking about in point 2? The Pats are a tougher oppenent
> than the Browns? Or are you talking about the meaningless pre-season
> schedule?
It's a semantics game. At this point, the Browns' opponents have a combined
record of 1-0, while the Patriots' opponents have a combined record of 0-1.
The "so far" enables him to tie the statement exclusively to the week 1
results so he can flip-flop later on as he needs to.
|
61.1827 | I'll stop scratching my haid now | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Sep 05 1995 17:25 | 7 |
|
Gotcha. I have a feeling this is going to be a long season. Let's
hope that, as the Browns fade, we don't get a plethora of "Have the
<insert some team that's not from Cleveland> ever won .....?"
Kevin
|
61.1828 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats rule Browns! | Tue Sep 05 1995 18:17 | 3 |
61.1829 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Tue Sep 05 1995 18:23 | 15 |
|
Tied with the afc west.
win lose
Oakland Denver KC Settle San Diego
Pitt Cincinn Hou Cleveland Jackson
Miami Ne NyJet Indy Buffalo
Dallas Washington Philly NyGiants Cards
Chicago Tampa Minn Detroit Green Bay
San Fran St.Louis Atlanta New Orleans Carolina
|
61.1830 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats rule Browns! | Tue Sep 05 1995 20:38 | 2 |
61.1831 | Groaner,Groaner,Groaner | FABSIX::K_JOHNSON | | Tue Sep 05 1995 23:36 | 29 |
| Hey Groaner can't reply like I want to I'm on a crazy
shift.If you even think that the central is the strongest division
in football its time to put the prescription away and hand over the
vodka.C'mon you were bragging about your big bad Brownies,how they
were gonna beat the pats and their 4string QB in Bledsoe.It maybe
just one game ,but after reading all the times you put the PATS
down,I for one find great satisfaction when you are DEAD WRONG!
PS Groaner,
I like the comment in the
sox note it was cute.
But I would bettcha
you would rethink
the" little" comment
if I were to be
standing next to you.
I like you groaner
your like that aunt
that you don't want
to invite over your
house for Christmas.
|
61.1832 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Sep 05 1995 23:49 | 1 |
61.1833 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 06 1995 09:12 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1817 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "Pats rule Browns!" >>>
> 2. The Browns played a much tougher schedule than the Pats so far.
I agree with you here. The Browns played the Pats which is a much better
team than the Pats played.
George
|
61.1834 | | WMGEN1::abs004p7.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Wed Sep 06 1995 12:57 | 3 |
| >It's a semantics game.
Gtoaaner and meaningless semantics. Who'da thunk it?
|
61.1835 | SAME OLD NOISE | BSS::HUNTER | | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:27 | 6 |
| Well, I've been out of this conference for years now and it seems that this Browns
note hasn't changed a bit...
Oh well, nice efforts against the Pats any how... ;^)
Big Game
|
61.1836 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:58 | 11 |
| > Big Game
Hey, Big Game, long time no note.
You ever hear from Mike JN? Is he still alive? Is he still kickin' around
out there?
'Saw
|
61.1837 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats trounce Browns in high school stadium | Thu Sep 07 1995 13:58 | 4 |
61.1838 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Thu Sep 07 1995 15:22 | 4 |
|
It took a little coaxing but I see Cactus Jack has returned!
Claybone
|
61.1839 | Mike JN Alive & Well | BSS::HUNTER | | Thu Sep 07 1995 16:45 | 12 |
| 'Saw... Great to note ya again... Life @ CXO has been very busy the last few years
but rewarding as well. Business is going well in the storage group and it's great to
be working for the company on the upswing as apposed to the stuff we were all dealing
with years gone by...
At any rate, I saw the Junk Noter not to long ago and he's doing great. He is back
working in his field again and having a good go at it.
Hey... How about them Clowns... Looks like the Pats get to do the Bronco on 'em
this year !! HA HA HA !!!
Big Game
|
61.1840 | Groaner !!! Buddy it's great to see you're still in LA LA Land !! | BSS::HUNTER | | Thu Sep 07 1995 16:49 | 4 |
| Groaner... Bet ya a buck (the on I still have hanging framed in my office) that the
donks finish with a better record that the Clowns.
Big Game
|
61.1841 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Pats trounce Browns in high school stadium | Thu Sep 07 1995 17:03 | 2 |
61.1842 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox swept by Yankees again! | Mon Sep 11 1995 08:11 | 2 |
61.1843 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 11 1995 09:04 | 3 |
| Too bad they've got the Browns dragging them down.
George
|
61.1844 | JaKe made ne say it.... | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Sep 12 1995 17:28 | 8 |
| quick question for Hal and Groaner....
How's it feel to be two games into the season and looking UP to
see the Bengals?
billl
|
61.1845 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Sox swept by Yankees again! | Tue Sep 12 1995 17:35 | 4 |
61.1846 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Sun Sep 24 1995 20:44 | 5 |
61.1847 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Sep 25 1995 10:00 | 9 |
| Well, I'm no Pittsburgh fan, but looking at this objectively, it's a long
season. Cleveland could sustain a couple of key injuries like Pittsburgh has
and before you know it, Houston could be in first place.
Course, that's must my opinion....
'Saw
|
61.1848 | pats will never make it to the bowl with drew | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Mon Sep 25 1995 12:12 | 2 |
61.1849 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Sep 25 1995 12:27 | 7 |
| >
> Vinnie 8 TDs, 1 INT #1 rated QB in the AFC... how's Drew doing?
>
I dunno. They didn't play this week. You'd have to ask a Pats fan to
get a meaningful answer to that one though.....
|
61.1850 | | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Mon Sep 25 1995 15:01 | 1 |
| Drew's team beat the #1 team in the AFC Central.
|
61.1851 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Mon Sep 25 1995 15:11 | 3 |
61.1852 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Tue Oct 03 1995 10:59 | 2 |
61.1853 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Oct 03 1995 11:08 | 4 |
|
Well, Testaverde, Beliupchuck, and apparently Crosby, at least...
Joe
|
61.1854 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Red Sox team slogan-Look how close we've been to winning it all | Tue Oct 03 1995 11:16 | 8 |
61.1855 | What was Belichek thinking??? | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Tue Oct 03 1995 11:31 | 11 |
| WHY THE HECK DID BELICHEK LET THE CLOCK RUN DOWN TO 8 SECONDS BEFORE
THE BUFFALO FG TO WIN IT?????? THAT MADE NO SENSE!!!!!! HE LET OVER
30 SECONDS RUN OFF THE CLOCK, TAKING AWAY HIS TEAM'S CHANCE TO TIE
OR WIN THE GAME. WHAT AN IDIOT!!!!!!
There, I feel better. And I'm not even a Browns fan. I just hate
stupid coaching decisions, and using your timeouts there was a
no-brainer. And the Browns returning the kick to near midfield made
the decision look even worse.
NAZZ
|
61.1856 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Red Sox - 1995 AL East Champs | Tue Oct 03 1995 11:55 | 14 |
|
Nazz,
He let the clock run down because it didn't matter. The
Browns had only 2 timeouts. Even if the Browns called the 2 time outs.
Which would have been 2nd and 3rd down. The Bills let the clock run
down to 8 seconds on 4th down. Then go ahead and kick the field goal.
Belichick is probably second guessing calling the timeout at
8 seconds. The play continued and Christie missed left. Goes to show
you that icing the kicker. Can work both ways, it gave him time to
clear up his head.
Ron
|
61.1857 | Makes more sense now | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Tue Oct 03 1995 14:15 | 4 |
| I thought the play they ran was second down, and the two TOs would have
set up a 4th down kick. Sorry.
NAZZ
|
61.1858 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Oct 03 1995 14:42 | 2 |
|
So much for the Browns and the best division in football.
|
61.1859 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Oct 03 1995 15:01 | 6 |
| re .1852: Browns sip!
But then the rest of us knew that...
billl
|
61.1860 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Year 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996 | Sun Oct 08 1995 14:21 | 3 |
61.1861 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Oct 09 1995 13:19 | 6 |
| > Close this note down, Art's moving the team to LA because he couldn't
> blackmail the city into building him a new stadium.
*&^% Model !@#$ Model jerk Model %^&*$%#@! creep Model.
Keith
|
61.1862 | Hal got Art's word on this | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:21 | 10 |
|
> Close this note down, Art's moving the team to LA because he couldn't
> blackmail the city into building him a new stadium.
Waitaminute, what about those personal promises Modell made to
Hal? Pretty sure that one of them was that _Cleveland_ would be
in the Super Bowl by next year...
glenn
|
61.1863 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Year 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996 | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:23 | 2 |
61.1864 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:25 | 6 |
| Are you sure this just isn't some form of blackmail by the Browns to get a
new stadium?
Seems they draw fairly well in Cleveland.
George
|
61.1865 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | Year 78 in the Sox 100 year rebuilding program - 1996 | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:35 | 4 |
61.1866 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 09 1995 15:50 | 12 |
| > Are you sure this just isn't some form of blackmail by the Browns to get a
>new stadium?
>
> Seems they draw fairly well in Cleveland.
>
> George
George, it seems the NFL may have franchises in places where they don't
belong, and the NFL is progressive enough to let owners move to where they
can make the most money. Seems to be just the set-up you've been clamoring
for.
|
61.1867 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Oct 09 1995 16:15 | 10 |
|
>> and the NFL is progressive enough to let owners move to where they
>> can make the most money.
Not really. They learned the hard way that there's nothing they can
do stop 'em when they lost in court to Al Davis. If they had their
druthers, they'd want to have kept the Rams in LA and the Browns
in Cleveland.
|
61.1868 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Oct 10 1995 14:27 | 9 |
| > Not really. They learned the hard way that there's nothing they can
> do stop 'em when they lost in court to Al Davis. If they had their
> druthers, they'd want to have kept the Rams in LA and the Browns
> in Cleveland.
Well, they may not be progressive on their own volition, but they
do fit the franchise-uprooting scenario George has seemed to advocate
for baseball.
|
61.1869 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sun Oct 22 1995 16:34 | 5 |
61.1870 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Mon Oct 23 1995 08:22 | 2 |
|
I take it Jacksonville held onto their lead yesterday?
|
61.1871 | or should that read Cleveland lost 23-15 | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 23 1995 08:29 | 2 |
61.1872 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Oct 23 1995 09:23 | 8 |
|
I said it before the season began; I'll say it again now...
1) Fire Bellichek
2) Fire Vinny
Joe
|
61.1873 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Oct 23 1995 09:32 | 11 |
| > I said it before the season began; I'll say it again now...
>
> 1) Fire Bellichek
>
> 2) Fire Vinny
>
> Joe
These things aren't going to make the team any better; and, they could
hurt the team's chances of staying in Cleveland.
|
61.1874 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 23 1995 09:35 | 2 |
61.1875 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Mon Oct 23 1995 09:51 | 6 |
| Paul,
If they do this (move to LA), will they then continue to follow the Rams
and move to St. Louis in a few years?
Roland
|
61.1876 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:13 | 9 |
|
To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure firing Bellichek & Vinny
would in any way change the Browns chance of moving...
Joe
BTW - for the Browns to do it right, they'd have to win the
Super Bowl this year, move to LA next year, and then on to
Saint Louis in 2045...
|
61.1877 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:51 | 5 |
| > BTW - for the Browns to do it right, they'd have to win the
> Super Bowl this year, move to LA next year, and then on to
> Saint Louis in 2045...
Oh good, at least someone knew what the h*ll I was talking about... :-)
|
61.1878 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Cleveland Indians a great team from a great city | Mon Oct 23 1995 11:54 | 3 |
|
Didn't know they had Super Bowls 47 years ago.
|
61.1879 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Oct 23 1995 12:06 | 20 |
|
Two teams, the Raiders and the Rams, leave LA because of
poor fan support, poor facilities and plain greed and Modell
wants to bring the mediocre Browns in? That's some kind of
threat? To take them somewhere where pro football is met
with general apathy? If I were a Clevelander I wouldn't worry.
If he threatened to take them to some wannabe-a-big-league town
like Nashville where they're rubes enough and desperate enough
to throw money and facilities at even a poor team like the
Browns then I'd be concerned. But as he's threatening to
leave some of the best fans in the NFL for a town where
historically they've shown a disinterest in football, I'd
laugh in his face.
BTW - was Jacobs Field built with public money?
|
61.1880 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 23 1995 12:12 | 14 |
61.1881 | Most likely blackmail but threat is real | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Oct 23 1995 12:15 | 13 |
| Regardless of media portrayal of various owners as sportsmen or even
human beings, the motive of all of them is pure greed. The purpose of
the cap was to not have to share non-gate,non-tv money with labor and
one of the prime sources is the freebies connected with a move.
The other trick of course is to hold up the municipality with the
threat of a move. That said move doesn't make sense in normal, human
fiscal terms is irrevelant - It can put money into a Modell's pocket
and thus has to be taken as a serious incentive.
Cleveland fans hasve been nothing short of a tremendous thruout the
history of the Browns and it would be trajedy for them to lose that
team.
|
61.1882 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Oct 23 1995 12:41 | 7 |
|
> BTW - was Jacobs Field built with public money?
Not completely, but there was significant public money involved,
in large part through a sin tax.
Joe
|
61.1883 | I'd worry | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 23 1995 13:39 | 25 |
|
> Two teams, the Raiders and the Rams, leave LA because of
> poor fan support, poor facilities and plain greed and Modell
> wants to bring the mediocre Browns in? That's some kind of
> threat? To take them somewhere where pro football is met
> with general apathy? If I were a Clevelander I wouldn't worry.
You're forgetting about the TV money, Tommy. The Los Angeles
market can't be ignored and the NFL won't allow it to be. The
owners that abandoned LA, Davis and Frontiere, were a couple of
loose cannons (looser than Modell, even) and they only left
after they couldn't pry loose sufficient blackmail. Once the
bluff is met and the cow is out of the barn the situation
changes, though, such as happened in St Louis (ohmygod we don't
have a team anymore!). The stakes are much higher here. Equal
TV revenue sharing caused a financial "paradox" in what was best
for all (the NFL) was not necessarily best for one. The NFL and
the TV networks, being for-profit ventures, will fix this paradox,
one way or the other. The NFL will find a way to offer up a
sufficient bribe to get someone into LA, even if the stands are
virtually empty, even if the team stinks, even if the franchise
is the Browns.
glenn
|
61.1884 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 23 1995 13:50 | 7 |
| Wouldn't it make more sense for someone like the Colts or Packers to move to
L.A?
Or one of those new teams, are Jacksonville and Charlette really better
pro football towns than Cleveland?
George
|
61.1885 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Oct 23 1995 14:07 | 15 |
|
>> You're forgetting about the TV money, Tommy. The Los Angeles
>> market can't be ignored and the NFL won't allow it to be.
If the NFL gives Modell anything they did not give or offer to Al
Davis, Al will end up getting that times three via treble damages.
I realize that the NFL desperately wants a franchise in the 2nd
largest market in the country. But given that Davis moved out be-
cause LA Coliseum wasn't financially viable and they're set to go
to court with Jerry Jones because of his maverick deals, I don't
see them giving Modell a thing especially when measured by attendance
and fan support, he has a successful franchise right where he is.
|
61.1886 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Oct 23 1995 14:11 | 4 |
|
re .1884
No. And no.
|
61.1887 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Oct 24 1995 08:34 | 5 |
| > Wouldn't it make more sense for someone like the Colts or Packers to move to
> L.A?
So far as Green Bay is concerned, it is a publicly owned franchise. Do you
think the people of Green Bay, as a group, are going to send their franchise to LA ?
|
61.1888 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Oct 24 1995 09:27 | 8 |
| I response to an earlier question, no, no expansion team has won a division
title in its first year.
Jacksonville can set a record for most wins in a season by an expansion team if
they win one more game (4).
'Saw
|
61.1889 | Send the Packers Pack'en | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 24 1995 09:48 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1887 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
> So far as Green Bay is concerned, it is a publicly owned franchise. Do you
>think the people of Green Bay, as a group, are going to send their franchise to
>LA ?
I don't know, the way they've been playing since Limbardi left ... ?
George
|
61.1890 | Green Bay pretty strong right about now | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Oct 24 1995 09:56 | 5 |
| Better take another look, George. GreenBay is 5-2 and looks like about
the 4th or 5th best team in football and one of the few that could
realistically contend with the big two, head to head. Yeh, I know they
got skunked in Dallas and lost there in playoffs but they'll get
another chance.
|
61.1891 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Oct 24 1995 10:09 | 9 |
| In addition, Green Bay just starting playing all of their home games back in
Green Bay. Two or three a year were being played in Milwaukee.
Green Bay fans are a hearty breed, have been for years, and I don't see that
franchise going any place where you can see the game in shirtsleeves in
December....
'Saw
|
61.1892 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 24 1995 11:56 | 4 |
61.1893 | Speaking of BC - ugh | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Oct 24 1995 12:38 | 6 |
| Favre's been hitting Steve Chmura, a BC guy, a lot lately. I'm not
sure about Jackson coming in and being the best thing for that Packer
team.
This will be the test of that chemistry factor and whether it means
anything.
|
61.1894 | | SALEM::DODA | The halfway house that Ruth built | Tue Oct 24 1995 12:42 | 7 |
| Jackson is an over-rated whiner who couldn't throw a decent block
if his life depended on it. Chmura has been doing a great job.
Beats me why GB wanted Jackson in camp so badly especially after
they've seen what Chmura has been able to do.
daryll
|
61.1895 | a dawg day | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed Oct 25 1995 13:43 | 9 |
|
The problem with the Browns are injuries....with Turner and
Langham playing hurt, you get burned. I don't think the Browns coaches
have alot of confidence in the backups. That better change.
Vinnie is out! Bring on the Rookie!
WOOF!
|
61.1896 | Come on baby lite my Zier? | AD::HEATH | Tribe Roooools Sox;Sox commit biggest choke in sports | Wed Oct 25 1995 15:31 | 7 |
|
The Browns will be a much better team with Zier at QB than Vinnie.
With the Steelers all banged up and Cinci playing out of their minds
look for the 'spots to take the central with a 9-7 record.
Jerry
|
61.1897 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Thu Oct 26 1995 08:59 | 3 |
| I haven't seen much sports news lately.
Why is Vinnie out? Is he injured, or is it just because he sucks pond water?
|
61.1898 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Oct 26 1995 09:02 | 13 |
|
Actually, it's more that Belichek sucks pond water.
Vinny, incredibly, has been playing _well_. Not great, but
surprisingly OK.
But, because the Belichek & staff are idiots, and therefore the
Browns are losing, Vinny is being benched.
Don't get me wrong - I'm sure Zeier's a better QB anyway - but it's
the coaching staff that really needs to be benched.
Joe
|
61.1899 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Thu Oct 26 1995 09:04 | 3 |
| Oh, okay. I see.
Well, the kid did look good in preseason.....
|
61.1900 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Oct 26 1995 10:59 | 7 |
|
Its the injuries I tell ya......two big ones on defense and two/three
on offense.....Jackson/Langham/Rison Turner/Alexander
WOOF
|
61.1901 | Hardly Vinnie's fault for that! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Thu Oct 26 1995 11:00 | 5 |
| Saw a graphic on Sportcenter - in the first four games, Browns defense
gave up only 11 ppg; in the last three (all losses), they've given up
28 ppg.
NAZZ
|
61.1902 | Sounds like a $money decision to me | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Oct 26 1995 13:48 | 1 |
|
|
61.1903 | more cash | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Oct 26 1995 14:01 | 7 |
|
May be right...suposably Rico Smith got a big bonus because of the
six catches he made last week. Ole Art may have gotten pissed at
Vinnie for making him pay out the bucks..
WOOF
|
61.1904 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Oct 30 1995 12:58 | 6 |
|
Good news...
Bellichek's in trouble w/ Modell...
Joe
|
61.1905 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 30 1995 14:45 | 1 |
61.1906 | Baltimore Browns? | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Fri Nov 03 1995 10:46 | 6 |
|
I thought the Browns were going to LA. Now I hear Baltimore. What's
the scoop?
Kevin
|
61.1907 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Nov 03 1995 10:49 | 2 |
61.1908 | Modell is a disgrace | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:25 | 19 |
| Nice of Modell to show his true colors and not show up for the Browns
game yesterday. Zeier showed why he was a 3rd round pick and why
Georgia never won anything. Fans were in an ugly mood. If I were a
Browns season ticket holder, I would be in an ugly mood, too.
Modell is supposedly getting a $50 million "enticement" fee just to
move his team. Then he will get all the revenues from all the luxury
boxes at the new stadium, where the Browns will play rent-free. Sounds
like a great deal, but I never want to hear the word "loyalty" ever
come out of that man's mouth again.
And it also brings up the question - How much money is enough? What
the hell is the old man gonna do with the extra $50 million?
Cleveland always sold out that old mausoleum, always posted the top TV
ratings numbers, and were perhaps the best fans in the NFL. And Modell
says "See ya." Just because he couldn't get luxury boxes????
NAZZ
|
61.1909 | If the Browns move to Baltimore, will they be the Colts? Or will Baltimore change its name? | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:33 | 3 |
| Actually, I'm surprised we haven't heard more from Paul G., Hal, and Joe
Huber about this. I'd be pretty frosted - the Browns fans have been nothing
if not loyal - I don't know what else could be asked of them...
|
61.1910 | Going once, twice | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Mon Nov 06 1995 10:40 | 11 |
| Just the latest in the "Which team(owner) is the biggest prostitute?"
saga. At this rate teams could be on the move every couple of years,
going to cities trying to become a "big league city" or regain that
"status". Fan loyalty means nada.
And folks wonder why college football and basketball continue to
attract the fans better than their pro counterparts.
IMHO
UMDan
|
61.1911 | Let's send in Levinson to investigate this homicide... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:02 | 17 |
|
This move, if it happens, might be the biggest outrage in the history
of professional sport. Even the Brooklyn Dodgers weren't as well
supported as the Cleveland Browns are.
And where's Baltimore getting all the money? Granted, Camden Yards
is beautiful and would have been profitable in its own right had it
been privately financed, but it was billed and sold to the public as
the centerpiece to the Inner Harbor which economically is a (relative)
failure. Baltimore is still Baltimore and while certain sections
(_real_ sections of the old city, like Fells Point) retain their charm,
on the whole it ain't pretty. It's not even close to a Boston and
never will be. A beautification program involving the import of Art
Modell and the Browns is doomed to failure...
glenn
|
61.1912 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:05 | 18 |
| > -< Let's send in Levinson to investigate this homicide... >-
Great season so far for Levinson....IMO.
> This move, if it happens, might be the biggest outrage in the history
> of professional sport. Even the Brooklyn Dodgers weren't as well
> supported as the Cleveland Browns are.
I'm surprised, to say the least.
But Old Art, old Looney Art, has the city by the short hairs and there ain't no
way they can stop him.
He's shufflin' off to Baltimore....
'Saw
|
61.1913 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:11 | 24 |
|
What Modell is doing to Browns fans is so foul that none
of us can even bring ourselves to even rag Groaner about
it because it ain't funny. No fans deserve this especially
not fans as loyal and hardcore as Cleveland fans. If it can
happen there, it can happen anywhere. I knew that the Browns
weren't going to LA. Towns like LA don't need an NFL franchise
to feel big league. It's the nouveau riche 'burgs in the sunbelt
or second-tier cities like Baltimore that will pay almost any price
to try and hang with the big boys. This is also why I said that
Tagliabue is full of it when he says that deals like Jerry's Nike
deal will entice more teams to move. If anything the Nike deal is
an enticement to stay right where the hell you are. Tagliabue, it's
the DALLAS Cowboys. It's the CLEVELAND Browns. If you can build and
succesfully market your team why move? You've essentially created a
brand name with strong name recognition so you don't need to move
for the big dough. Not that Modell *needs* to move. This is a big
cash grab plain and simple. There's no debt service because he owns
the team outright. He has had sellouts for as long as anyone can
remember and the teams local tv ratings are among the best in the
league. Art's sole motivation is pure greed. My only question is
where are the pro-owner guys like Joe Garbarino and Darryl Doda
when these things happen?
|
61.1914 | | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:20 | 19 |
| <<< Note 61.1913 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> My only question is
> where are the pro-owner guys like Joe Garbarino and Darryl Doda
> when these things happen?
Oh please. Do I sense a fixation problem or what?
What Modell is doing is an outrage. I'm the one that called
for revenue sharing and all that in MLB just to stop this sort of
crap. I'm an NOT the one that supported Jimmah money-grabbing
in Dallas. This is the end result of that. So why are you
complaining? On one hand you applaud Jimmah's greed and then
you moan when other owners resort to these type of deals in order
to keep up and remain competetive. Stop talking out of both side
of your mouth.
Sheesh.
daryll
|
61.1915 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:47 | 25 |
|
>> On one hand you applaud Jimmah's greed and then you moan when other
>> owners resort to these type of deals in order to keep up and remain
>> competetive.
When you say "Jimmah" I assume you mean "Jerrah" as in Jerry Jones,
the owner of the Cowboys. I don't necessarily "applaud his greed"
but I find him building and marketing a successful franchise prefer-
able to Modell's method of generating revenue. Any idiot can do what
Modell's doing by spitting in the faces of Cleveland Browns fans.
Jones could have done it. Instead, Jones has pretty much ensured that
the Cowboys will be the *Dallas* Cowboys for as long as he owns them.
The Nashville Cowboys? I don't think so. Jerry's move didn't lead to
Modell's move. Modell like Irsay, Frontiere and Davis plotted their
moves long before Jerry ever announced his Nike deal. You honestly
think that Modell is doing this to keep the Browns "competitive"?
Really? As for my "fixation", I just find it just a little curious that
when Frank Thomas gripes about moving bp we're led to believe that he's
public enemy number one and doesn't care about the fans. But Modell pulls
one of the most heinous moves ever and we hear nary a peep. Modell's
move shows just how transparent these little fan appreciation moves are.
Moves, btw, that the owners never made when revenues were flowing in and
the owners appreciated that and not much else. This move isn't about
remaining competitive. It's about pure greed.
|
61.1916 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Mon Nov 06 1995 12:58 | 13 |
| > public enemy number one and doesn't care about the fans. But Modell pulls
> one of the most heinous moves ever and we hear nary a peep. Modell's
> move shows just how transparent these little fan appreciation moves are.
> Moves, btw, that the owners never made when revenues were flowing in and
> the owners appreciated that and not much else. This move isn't about
> remaining competitive. It's about pure greed.
Tommy,
I think even the most anti-player union people in here would say
that Modell's move is about as bad as an owner can get. OTOH, that
doesn't mean we suddenly start thinking the players are pure and virtuous.
Hardly.
|
61.1917 | Perhaps I should've logged in from home yesterday | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:02 | 14 |
| Greed is greed. I believe that one has led to the other. You can
choose to believe whatever you prefer.
The full force money-grabbing has begun and Jones started it. I'd
guess that the Browns do not have the same resourced to generate
the type of revenue that Jones has the opportunity for. Modell
chose this method in order to remain competitive. I don't support
either move.
Oh, and do let me know what my time period is for getting in here
after every such move before I'm lambasted for remaining silent.
I'll add it to my daily calendar.
daryll
|
61.1918 | | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:04 | 11 |
| >What Modell is doing is an outrage. I'm the one that called
>for revenue sharing and all that in MLB just to stop this sort of
>crap.
Excuse me but the NFL has revenue sharing, a salary cap and
everything else you wanted in MLB. This is why there are few good guys
in sports today. Everyone is in it for the money pure and simple.
Forget loyalty. That's why the past few years I watch more and more
High School games and Youth sports. Yeah the abilities aren't the same
but you can still root for a team just as hard.
|
61.1919 | | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:11 | 10 |
|
> Excuse me but the NFL has revenue sharing, a salary cap and
> everything else you wanted in MLB.
Jones has circumvented the revenue sharing with his own
private endorsements. The salary cap is a joke as proven by the
Deion deal, which by the way was largely financed by his
Coke/pepsi/whatever deals.
daryll
|
61.1920 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:16 | 13 |
|
>> I'd guess that the Browns do not have the same resourced
>> to generate the type of revenue that Jones has the opportunity
>> for. Modell chose this method in order to remain competitive. I
>> don't support either move.
Modell has a hundred million reasons to move to Baltimore and
being competitive with the Cowboys ain't one of them. He better
worry about being competitive with the Steelers, Oilers, Bengals
and Jaguars first because he ain't. This move didn't just happen
since Jones cut his deal with Nike. It's been in the works for a
while.
|
61.1921 | More interesting than the Browns, and this is the Ballimer note | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:18 | 15 |
|
>> -< Let's send in Levinson to investigate this homicide... >-
>
> Great season so far for Levinson....IMO.
I screwed up and missed the second half of the arsonist episode.
What happened?
Sad to see Ned Beatty's character leave, but good riddance
to that Baldwin jerk. As long as they keep Det. Pembleton, though,
the show is a keeper. Pembleton has got to be the best character on
all of television...
glenn
|
61.1922 | We have found the enemy and ... | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:22 | 18 |
| Well regardless, this should finally put an end to the perception that
franchise owners have some kind of moral or ethical high-ground and
that the greed is on the side of the players. I, personally would go
one step furthur and say that the Jordans and Cones could never go far
enough in their distrust of sports ownership.
And there's another good reason not to bash Groaner etco; Our own team
is now on tenterhooks with the megaplex dead for another year.
Regardless of indoor-outdoor, in Boston in Foxboro arguments, Kraft had
an assurance of a new stadium and he now knows he was a sucker.
Whereas Moledell's move is without conscience, Kraft could and maybe
will have to go where the money and civic support is.
Finally we see in this tale of two cities a completely different view
of urban economics: Baltimore management is saying having the pro
football team will bring big economic payback, Cleveland not so
strongly and surely tardily and finally Boston who tells Kraft "you're
not important, we can do without you and conventions too".
|
61.1924 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:28 | 25 |
|
> Zeier showed why he was a 3rd round pick and why
> Georgia never won anything.
I still think Zeier will be a fine QB; that's he's not there yet isn't
terribly surprising.
> And it also brings up the question - How much money is enough? What
> the hell is the old man gonna do with the extra $50 million?
FWIW: he's going to keep it so his son can pay the inheritance tax
when Modell dies, or so he says.
If the Browns move, at least Cleveland will be free of Modell.
You know, a few years back Bill James proposed (in his Baseball Book)
making it illegal for cities to spend public money to lure teams
away _or_ to stay. If a market isn't making money, fine - a team
that thinks it can do better elsewhere can move. But you wouldn't
get insanity such as Balitmore's $50 million offer _or_ Modell's
attempt to blackmail Cleveland. I _really_ hope Cleveland doesn't
give in - if Modell's going to be a jerk, let him go. I sincerely
doubt the NFL is going to stay out of Cleveland for long...
Joe
|
61.1925 | | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:29 | 8 |
| As I said, you can choose to believe whatever you like. I've been
consistent in my opinion of moving franchises, MLB or NFL.
We're in violent agreement on the move.
Let it drop.
daryll
|
61.1926 | They're all stinking thieves, NFL worst of all... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:31 | 23 |
|
> This is also why I said that
> Tagliabue is full of it when he says that deals like Jerry's Nike
> deal will entice more teams to move. If anything the Nike deal is
> an enticement to stay right where the hell you are. Tagliabue, it's
> the DALLAS Cowboys. It's the CLEVELAND Browns. If you can build and
> succesfully market your team why move?
I have to disagree some here. The Dallas Cowboys are a very special
case possibly in all of sports and certainly in all of the NFL.
Jerry Jones didn't create their marketing success, he merely restored
it to its former glory, which was a _relatively_ easy task (on the
marketing end). When he pulls out and doesn't share that marketing
revenue, it raises the bar for everyone else. Call it greed, sure,
that's what it is, but it's almost human nature to strive to be #1 or
to at least shoot for what #1 is hauling down. Keeping up with the
Joneses, literally in this case.
Independent licensing deals, personal seat licenses, stadium deals,
franchise moves; I'll throw them all in the same pot...
glenn
|
61.1927 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:44 | 4 |
| let's see Browns move to Baltimore, Pats move to Cleveland, Groaner
becomes Pats fan via rule 1 of fan rules posted somewhere.
Jimbo
|
61.1928 | I doubt it | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 06 1995 13:47 | 2 |
| the question is does he become a Baltimore Browns fan and commute down
to Baltimore for games?
|
61.1929 | | DELNI::FORGET | | Mon Nov 06 1995 14:01 | 5 |
|
Now that the Browns appear to be moving to Baltimore, what happens
to the Baltimore Stallions (CFL)? Seattle,Cinnicinti, Tampa Bay, NE,
Houston are all looking to relocate.
|
61.1930 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 06 1995 14:23 | 19 |
| It's always bad for the old fans when teams move but it's not the end of the
world. In fact there is a tradition for Baltimore losing one team and replacing
them with the "Browns".
In baseball Baltimore lost the Yankees back in 1903 then around 1954 they
went out and got the St. Louis Browns. The Mayor of St Louis and their fans
were up in arms but somehow it all worked out.
It's a free market and ultimately the 30 cities most willing and able to
support pro football will end up with teams. That is if there are 30 cities
willing and able to support pro football.
Cleveland is a decent size city with a football tradition. If they want
a team it will just be a matter of a few years before they get one. Most
likely what it will take is building a new football stadium.
Who knows, maybe they'll lure the Colts away from Indy.
George
|
61.1931 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | I packed my John Lee Hooker | Mon Nov 06 1995 14:59 | 3 |
|
So Groaner, are you going to start rooting for the Bengals after the
Browns leave the mistake by the lake for greener pastures in MARYland.
|
61.1932 | Isn't Pittsburgh just as close? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 06 1995 15:40 | 1 |
|
|
61.1933 | Crazed Nation pipes in on | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 06 1995 16:03 | 14 |
| #2 6-NOV-1995 14:39:31.37
NEWMAIL
From: US2RMC::"[email protected]" "Yoseff francus"
Subj: please post
Another banner day for the city of Cleveland. The chance that any team
from Cleveland will win a championship takes a blow with the Browns
moving to Baltimore. A team with tradition and history in a city has
given up on the city. Not something to be proud of.
Any reactio yet from the tearsome duo??
The Crazy Met
|
61.1934 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 06 1995 16:12 | 7 |
61.1935 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Mon Nov 06 1995 16:13 | 2 |
| Anyone have any idea what the players' union has to say about
franchise relocation ? Anything ? Are they supportive ?
|
61.1936 | Couldn't have been more emphatic-- greed knows some bounds? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Mon Nov 06 1995 16:14 | 9 |
|
> Anyone have any idea what the players' union has to say about
> franchise relocation ? Anything ? Are they supportive ?
Gene Upshaw spoke out adamantly against it, in the Browns' case...
glenn
|
61.1937 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Mon Nov 06 1995 16:19 | 7 |
|
Its called what will the courts decide this time? The City of
Cleveland has gone to court and filed an injunction. To try and
prevent the team from moving. Modell needs the vote of 23 owners
to get permission to move. What will the NFL do this time?
Ron
|
61.1938 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Nov 06 1995 16:33 | 6 |
|
they'll probably try to block it but will have no success. Ditka
was all over Jerry Jones blaming him for the move. I'm not surprised
Modell's always been a first class idiot in my books.........
mike
|
61.1939 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 06 1995 16:48 | 3 |
61.1940 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Nov 06 1995 16:54 | 7 |
| I don't think the owners have much of a chance in court. Didn't they try
to stop Davis from moving the Oakland Raiders to L.A.? I don't think he worried
a lot about getting permission to move back either.
Same with the Colts, wasn't that a "midnight move"?
George
|
61.1941 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 06 1995 17:00 | 8 |
| I believe for the Rams move to St Louis the nfl managed to funnel some
of the money to the league as a compromise. If the NFL were to try to
stop this move after not stopping the Colts from moving a decade ago
then they might have two suits: Modell and Baltimore.
Upshaw may have had some pretty words but the Baltimore deal puts more
money in the Cap bank for the players. What they don't get (I presume)
is a cut of the action Modell gets for the actual move.
|
61.1942 | Going, going, going, .... but not quite gone, yet. | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Mon Nov 06 1995 17:11 | 12 |
| From Reuters:
The city of Cleveland has won a temporary restraining order to stop the
Browns from moving. The state of Maryland has reported that they have signed
a contract to move the team. However, looks like Cleveland won't let 'em
go without a fight.
My guess is they'll delay 'em, but this deal is cooked. The Browns will be
in Indianapolis by July of 1996. Modelll trully sucks. This makes no
sense to me at all.
zamboni
|
61.1943 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Mon Nov 06 1995 17:17 | 14 |
| > Maybe in this instance Modell is an idiot, but he has done as much for
> the league in the past as any other owner.
I wouldn't call him an idiot; if I had a chance to make 50 million dollars
I'd probably do it, too. However, anyone calling him a traitor to the
Cleveland area would be right on; he certainly shouldn't ever try any
other business venture there.
Of course, maybe he thought the Indians had a great chance to win the
World Series; when he saw them fail, then reflected on his past failed
opportunities to get to the Super Bowl with the Browns, he might have
decided the city really is a cursed, jinxed place and figured his only
hope to achieve true greatness were dependent on a move. That seems
highly logical to me.
|
61.1944 | Tcm - Add in | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Nov 06 1995 17:46 | 20 |
| I happened upon the basenote (61.0) earlier by Hal - pretty prophetic
except he's selling (out) the city not the team.
And the crazy met responds but I think this is my last shot at Mr
Postman and of course I disclaim any and all opinions of either party
except to say watching those two go at it was one of the little
chestnuts of sprots-dom
From tcm
Subj: Re: please post
po' po' Groaner having insult heaped upon injury. The Indians 100 win
season goes for naught and then his beloved Browns up and leave town.
It is a comfort to know that I can be of some service in getting him to
post and share his feelngs with others; he needs to be able to share
his pain at such a miserable time in his life.
The Crazy Met
|
61.1945 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Nov 06 1995 22:10 | 4 |
61.1946 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 08:45 | 7 |
| RE: .1945
Please explain. A runt is "an undersized person" (American Heritage dict.).
So, are his words worthless because he's undersized?
By the way, his picture wasn't there... :-)
|
61.1947 | free market indeed | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Tue Nov 07 1995 09:25 | 14 |
| During last nights half time show, Peter King from SI stated that
the Cowboys grossed over 40 million more than the Browns last
year and that his recent deal which circumvent the NFL properties
partnership is enabling him to widen that gap and use that money
for signing bonus' for Sanders and others.
So how some of you, who applauded Jones' moneygrab, and believe that
those actions have nothing to do with this move can continue to
bleat on about how they were unrelated defy logic.
The Browns are 30 mil in the red, most of it coming over the past
two years. That is from keeping up with the Jones.
daryll
|
61.1948 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Tue Nov 07 1995 10:21 | 20 |
|
Plain and simple, even with 75K+ at every game. With great
fan support. The Browns are still loosing money. Modell has been asking
for years, for stadium renovations. What has Cleveland done? They
built Jacobs Field, Gund Arena, and the Rock and Roll hall of fame.
Art's basically saying to the city of Cleveland. You choose who you
were going to support. You built Baseball and Basketball stadiums.
Plus the Rock and Roll hall a fame. I'm going somewhere that will
build me a stadium.
Modell would be a stupid business man if he didn't take the deal.
They are building a new 200 million 70K seat stadium. With luxury
boxes and 7,500 preferred seating. He his getting a 30 yr lease for
free. His only expense is going to be the maintenance on the stadium.
Which is expected to be ~4 million a year. He gets parking,
concessions, plus all stadium advertising.
With other deals like this one waiting. I expect the Patriots to
leave New England, for the '97 season.
Ron
|
61.1949 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Nov 07 1995 10:40 | 3 |
61.1950 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Nov 07 1995 10:44 | 10 |
| To a Steeler fan this move by Modell sucks pond water!
It's like the Hatfields up and moving to Beverly Hills
leaving the McCoys alone with no one to shoot at.
What fun is that?!
billl
|
61.1951 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 10:48 | 4 |
| > What happens when the 1997 Patriots take the field in the new stadium
> in Cleveland?
Oh, I'm sure you'll bandwagon-jump... :-)
|
61.1952 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Nov 07 1995 10:52 | 11 |
|
OK, at this point, the best scenario I can come up with is:
1) The Browns move, only to find themselves playing in front of
no one.
2) Cleveland gets an expansion team.
The Browns are running 15 million/year in the red? Yeah, right...
Joe
|
61.1953 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:06 | 9 |
61.1954 | Nothing seems final to me yet | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:18 | 7 |
| This still has to pass a vote of owners and if owners veto it will have
to go to court. Although Davis and Alioto beat the NFL that doesn't
mean that Modell automatically will. And if this does pass court test
because NFL can't deny any team from doing what it does then is the
league truly viable and does it need new bylaws.
Perhaps a deal will be cut and Tampa will move into Cleveland.
|
61.1955 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:21 | 23 |
|
> What guarantees Cleveland an expansion team?
Nothing. OTOH, it's not a terribly unlikely result, if some team
doesn't move to Cleveland first...
> What size market are they?
#13. In terms of TV ratings, consistently #1 or close to it, though...
> L.A. will be first when it comes to that.
Nah, someone will move to LA, first.
> This also goes to show you that it is cheaper to keep a team, than to
> let it go and hope for another team. The Browns would've stayed for a
> ~$270M investment. An expansion team would cost them a new stadium
> anyway + the franchise fees, etc.
Of course, there's already an issue on the ballot in Cleveland that
will put up the money for a stadium...
Joe
|
61.1956 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:23 | 6 |
|
> Perhaps a deal will be cut and Tampa will move into Cleveland.
I wouldn't want them (or any other existing team, for that matter).
Joe
|
61.1957 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:29 | 5 |
| > I wouldn't want them (or any other existing team, for that matter).
Yeah, I think that if/when the Patriots move, I would feel the same way.
It would feel better to start from scratch. Although I could live with the
49ers... :-)
|
61.1958 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | I packed my John Lee Hooker | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:30 | 4 |
|
What current owner in his right mind would want to play in that stadium?
Cleveland has great fan support, but they're to cheap to build a new
stadium. Why didnt they build Jacobs as a multi-purpose arena?
|
61.1959 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:37 | 18 |
|
> What current owner in his right mind would want to play in that stadium?
Oh, come on. Are you seriously suggesting that a team playing in
Cleveland Stadium can't be in the top 30 in terms of stadium revenue?
> Cleveland has great fan support, but they're to cheap to build a new
> stadium.
Are they? There's a measure on the ballot _today_ to provide money
for just such a venture.
> Why didnt they build Jacobs as a multi-purpose arena?
Because they wanted a great _baseball_ field. I don't have _any_
problem with that decision.
Joe
|
61.1960 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:38 | 6 |
| >Why didnt they build Jacobs as a multi-purpose arena?
I think it was built by the guy who owned the Indians - he could probably
care less about the Browns. Who knows, single-purpose might have even been
a stipulation. Any of you Cleveland guys have the financial details on that
one?
|
61.1961 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | I packed my John Lee Hooker | Tue Nov 07 1995 11:53 | 4 |
|
If that stadium is generating so much revenue why is Modell pulling
out? From what I've seen of the other stadiums, Cleveland Municpal has
to be one of if not the worst in the league.
|
61.1962 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:09 | 27 |
|
I have a problem with two things...
One. The idea that this was all precipitated by Jerry Jones'
cash grab. No way. This all started when Al Davis showed that
the real big money wasn't in building a successful franchise.
The really big money is in moving or holding up the city that
you're in. Bob Irsay learned that lesson well. So did Frontiere
and the rest. Baltimore may or may not be competitive with the
Cowboys and the 9ers. If they are it'll because they've got a
good front office not because they have deep pockets. The blame
here doesn't lie with Jerry Jones, it lies with the owners who move
and the cities that are foolish enough to pay them. Wave a half a
billion dollars in someone's face and they tend to do some crazy
(or not so crazy) things.
The other thing is this belief that cities and states should pay
ransom to keep their franchises. There's a huge emotional attachment
between teams and towns and some owners will exploit that to full
financial advantage. Modell says that he didn't want to hold the
city of Cleveland up. He didn't have to! He's getting damn near a
half a billion dollar deal. How is Cleveland going to compete with
that? And why would they? In the vast majority of American cities,
including Boston, there are many better ways to spend a half billion
dollars. Working on graduating better than 50% of your high school
students would be a good place to start. What Baltimore is doin is
insane and only increases the likelihood that other teams will move.
|
61.1963 | | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:27 | 16 |
| No wait a minute. Irsay moved over 10 years ago. The Raiders move
or threatened moves almost every year for the past 15 years. Now,
all of a sudden, we have at least 3 teams (that we know of) that
are seriously considering moving and you think that the deals in
Dallas have nothing to do with it? Then why now, why not 2,5,10
years ago?
BS. It has everything to do with it. It's the support of Jones
that's the problem here. All that free market drivel that I've
had thrown in my face during the baseball strike rings true here,
but this is different eh? Hardly.
The NFl is a partnership and Jones is hardly acting as a partner.
The others are just following suit.
daryll
|
61.1964 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:34 | 17 |
|
>> BS. It has everything to do with it. It's the support of Jones
>> that's the problem here.
Daryll, two teams moved last year (Rams, Raiders). That was before
Jones deal was announced. Kraft, Modell and the rest of them gave
their ultimatums before the Jones deal was announced. Get used to
it. This is sports life in the '90s. Modell didn't see Jones make his
deal and then think, "Gee, I have to screw Browns fans to the wall
to be competitive." Baltimore waved an ungodly amount of money in
his face and he grabbed it. Plain and simple. He didn't lose $30
million. He isn't trying to compete with the Cowboys. He's going
for the bucks and that's all.
|
61.1965 | New name? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:37 | 17 |
| The basic question seems to be What is the economic viability of an NFL
Franchise and is the State of Maryland making an intelligent decision
in spending the money to build and bring a stadium/team to Baltimore
vis a vis Tommy's argument of spending the money on education.
Interestingly the first city to be held for ransom was Boston and it
lost the Patriots to Foxboro but New England was saved when Fine built
the stadium for < 10 mil.
Btw - if Cleveland sues to retain the name Browns for a future team
what will the new Baltimore team be called:
The new-colts
new-young-spririted-horses
Baltimore Football Orioles
Pirates/Thieves/Extortionists/Swindlers
Soft Shells
|
61.1966 | Baltimore deserves much of the blam (tm) | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:50 | 20 |
| I don't think competing with Cowboys (or anybody else for that matter)
had anyu bearing at all on this deal. To me, competition is just above
loyalty to the fans in the pecking order for an NFL owner. This deal
is about one thing and one thing only: M-O-N-E-Y.
If we are to believe what we read, Modell is getting a $50 million cash
incentive just to money. He gets 30 years rent free a the new
stadium. He's even getting improvements to enlarge the seating
capacity at War Memorial Stadium for the two years his team will play
there. He gets all the money from concessions. He gets all the money
from parking. He gets all the money from signs. He gets 108 luxury
boxes from which he keeps all the revenues. There is $15 million to
build a separate training facility, which will be funded from those
odious permanent seat licenses.
It's clear that the city of Baltimore and the state of Maryland have
sold their soul to get an NFL franchise. I'd love to see this blow up
in their greedy little faces.
NAZZ
|
61.1967 | becoming terminally cynical... | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:54 | 10 |
| With the latest trends of all professional sports, it's
almost enough to snub them all and turn to college
sports for entertainment.
My only problem with that is I'm afraid the college's
are hot on their heels.
billl
|
61.1968 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 07 1995 12:59 | 8 |
| Nazz,
Are you forgetting that Baltimore had a team stolen from it? They
can hardly be blamed, last of all at any rate. They know life with a
team and without and are choosing "with". They've already been told in
no uncertain terms there are no rules and all is fair.
And this baloney about Modell losing money. Along with all the
rest... is there absolutely no limit to human gullibility?
|
61.1969 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Nov 07 1995 13:07 | 22 |
| Someone mentioned an expansion team and there lies the problem. The free
market is working, it's working very well and what it's saying is that any
irresponsible organization, like MLB or the NFL that expands too much is going
to get into trouble.
Right now there are 30 NFL Football teams and many of them are struggling.
Is going to 32 or 34 really the answer? I don't think so. When every other
industry is downsizing only the major league sports are trying to expand then
getting all bent out of shape because the weaker teams can't seen to cut it.
Because they over expanded the pickings are slim and teams can no longer run
sloppy operations and get away with it. TV money gets spread thinner, there is a
lot more competition for the best cities. Teams have to operate at smaller
margins and be more efficient or they will lose money.
Ultimately someone will probably figure out that the problem is that there
are too many teams and they will have to cut back to a level that will be
supported by the fans. That happened in baseball all the time back in the
19th century when they were going through this type of chaos and it's probably
what will end up happening here.
George
|
61.1970 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Nov 07 1995 13:13 | 20 |
| There was a big discussion on this the other day on the FAN and they were
saying (and rightly so IMO) that expansion should stop for a while.
The reason was basically is that there are not enough quality QBs to go around
right now.
Sort of like in baseball, there's never enough quality pitchers.
Personally, and probably most folks will dispute me, but I think that over the
years integrity and tradition, and loyalty have fallen by the wayside.
I'm sure that years ago, owners could have pulled the same crap that Al Davis,
Bob Irsay and now Art Modell are pulling, but probably back then things like
integrity and loyalty and tradition meant a little more than they mean today.
Nowadays it's the almighty buck. Gotta move the team cause we can make a big
bonanza payday.
It's sad. Everything is so plastic today....
|
61.1971 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 13:21 | 24 |
| > Are you forgetting that Baltimore had a team stolen from it? They
> can hardly be blamed, last of all at any rate.
Why?
If someone does something to you, does that make it OK to go ahead and do
the same thing to someone else? If I put a gun to your head and rob you, is
it OK for you to turn around and do the same to someone else. If anything,
having experienced that, I'd think you'd show a little more empathy towards
those being robbed.
Your logic is faulty at best.
Johnny U. was on TV this morning saying that he would have greatly preferred
an expansion team over taking the team from another city, but that the NFL
wouldn't grant them an expansion franchise. If you buy into the logic that you
*have* to have a team, this makes sense. I'm not sure I can buy into that,
though.
If the Patriots wanted $500 million in concessions to stay, I'd think the state
of Massachusetts would be *crazy* to give it to them. Like Tommy said, there
are significantly more important things to spend the money on. I'd *love* to
see the financial analysis where the folks of Baltimore and the state of
Maryland figured out how much cash they could throw at this.
|
61.1972 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Nov 07 1995 13:23 | 20 |
|
> If that stadium is generating so much revenue why is Modell pulling
> out?
1) Modell gets $50 million cash up front for moving.
2) Modell gets a new stadium that, potentially, can produce even
_more_ revenue.
3) Modell gets a 10 year guarentee that he'll get the maximum
possible revenue, even if no one shows up.
> From what I've seen of the other stadiums, Cleveland Municpal has
> to be one of if not the worst in the league.
Have you ever been there? While it's not state of the art, it's
still a fine place to watch a game.
Joe
|
61.1973 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Nov 07 1995 13:25 | 6 |
61.1974 | New England would do it in a minute too | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 07 1995 13:36 | 12 |
| They're hardly robbing anyone in fact they're saving the good football
fans of Cleveland thousands of dollars wasted on Sunday afternoons not
to speak of the healthy exercise and other positive non-football
things they can do.
And there are rules against robbery but the nfl has told Baltimore
there are no rules regarding bringing a team to town, only "have plenty
of money".
By not granting Baltimore another team all the cities acquiessed (sic)
in the "theft" and became potential targets themselves. Nothing wrong
with my logic only in your slanting of it.
|
61.1975 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Nov 07 1995 13:47 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1973 by OUTSRC::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>
> There is a way where this type of thing can be curbed in all sports.
> Say the Browns do go to Baltimore. Have a civil court judge award
> Cleveland financial damages equivalent to what Baltimore offered
> Modell. I think this would make team owners think twice.
I don't think there is any basis for this type of remedy in civil law. Unless
there was a contract that was breached, the Browns have the right to go to any
city they want. Even if there was a contract they would only be responsible for
what that contract specified.
I'm afraid your motion would be denied.
George
|
61.1976 | Baltimore, of all cities, should know better | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Tue Nov 07 1995 13:55 | 12 |
| I am certainly not forgetting that Bob Irsay slinked out of Baltimore
in the middle of the night. But as another noter so accurately put it,
that should make the city of Baltimore and the state of Maryland more
aware of how terrible it feels to lose their franchise and less likely
to do it to someone else.
It's great that Maryland can afford to throw $500 million at Modell to
lure him to Baltimore, but the glow of having an NFL franchise may dim
some when tax increases and service cuts are needed to give Modell his
pound of flesh.
NAZZ
|
61.1977 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Nov 07 1995 14:08 | 26 |
| This situation is likely to get worse before it gets any better. The problem
is that the leagues are too big. There are too many major league teams trying
to make a go of it in minor league towns.
If you look back to the 50's most major leagues had about 16 teams. Then when
TV money came along they all expanded to the low 20s and that seemed to work
OK. If there were differences between what you could make in New York and
Minneapolis TV money split 24 ways seemed to iron things out.
Problem is that now they are up around 30 teams and TV money split 30 ways
can't iron out the problems it could when there were 24 or so teams trying to
split the pie. This results in there being teams that are haves and teams that
are have nots with the poorer teams scrambling to pick up the chips where ever
they land.
The courts clearly won't let the leagues or cities enact rules saying who can
play where so the leagues will eventually have to do what every other industry
has to do when they over expand, downsize.
It happened here at Digital, it's happened in other places a million times.
If you get to big for your market you ultimately have two choices, make cuts or
go out of business. Unless they come up with a new form of revenue the major
leagues now hurting at around 30 teams each will have to seriously consider
cutting back to the low or mid 20s or this situation will only get worse.
George
|
61.1978 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Nov 07 1995 14:32 | 8 |
|
If Modell is loosing money in Cleveland it would have to be because
he has a bigger drug problem than the city of boston combined. TV
money a stadium that's always full and his share of the other revenue.
There's no way he's loosing money. He may not be making as much as
some other owners but no way he's loosing money.......
mike
|
61.1979 | I made 10 mil less than Jerry = I lost 10 | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 07 1995 14:44 | 15 |
| Exactly, in corpspeak "losing money" means not making as much money as
one would like, the same thing that Michael Jordan is condemned for
speaking out about.
When the famous "caps" were enacted which froze profits connected to
gate revenue and tv revenue the race was on for dollars that the
players couldn't get a percent of or other income whether the dratted
players could touch it or not.
Thus Jerry Jones, thus Art Modell. The sticky thing to understand is
the consummate grief that an Art Modell feels, the pain mind you, when
he sees one of his nfl peers making more money than him.
As with Michael and Patrick the actual money no longer counts its the
race to make more than the other guy.
|
61.1980 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Tue Nov 07 1995 14:56 | 10 |
| > Thus Jerry Jones, thus Art Modell. The sticky thing to understand is
> the consummate grief that an Art Modell feels, the pain mind you, when
> he sees one of his nfl peers making more money than him.
My empathy for him is unbounded...
I wouldn't be surprised if some fanatic Browns season ticket-holder blew up
Baltimore's Memorial Stadium. Then Modell doesn't have anyplace to play for
two years... I'm sure the city of Cleveland could rent to him at a <ahem>
reasonable price...
|
61.1981 | | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Tue Nov 07 1995 15:12 | 18 |
| >>When the famous "caps" were enacted which froze profits connected to
>>gate revenue and tv revenue the race was on for dollars that the
>>players couldn't get a percent of or other income whether the dratted
>>players could touch it or not.
I think things the players will be coming after the league for money
from Season ticket licences, Luxury Boxes and even things like the
money Baltimore is giving Modell (50 mill?) for moving. There agreement
calls for x % of all NFL revenues. From what I've read that means
everything! So JJ's Pepsi deal, Al Davis' sweetheart deal with Oakland
could end up being big plusses for the players.
Another thing I read this weekend was that the owners were looking for
an arbitrator ruling on Neon Dion's contract. If the arbitrator ruled
it illegal then there would be enough owner votes to extend the current
players contract for 3 years. If the loopholes were not closed then we
may have another Labor dispute brewing.
Mike
|
61.1982 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Nov 07 1995 15:28 | 15 |
|
The owners aren't just trying to stash revenue from the players.
They're trying to stash it from each other. Hence, the Jones deal.
Hence, Personal Seat Licenses. Hence, the franchise moves. Hence,
the cry for the dreaded luxury boxes. All those are revenues that
they don't have to share with the other 29 multi-millionaires. And
these moves aren't a function of expansion. Though I agree with George
that the leagues are over expanded. Over expansion breeds mediocrity
and that's what we're seeing week after week. This is really a fun-
ction of a skewed set of values on the part of owners and the cities
that court them. I didn't disagree with Jerry Jones' side deals be-
cause I didn't see who got hurt save a few rich owners who might
actually have to work a little harder. The Modell move, on the other
hand, sends a very disturbing signal. There's never been a better
time to be a Cowboys fan or a worse time to be a Browns fan.
|
61.1983 | As you can tell, I don't play a lawyer on TV | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Thu Nov 09 1995 09:46 | 6 |
| I've simply gotta believe that personal seat licenses are illegal for
teams that currently exist. I can understand how Jacksonville and
Carolina can do it, but making current season ticket holders pay for
something they already have seems like double jeopardy or sumpin'.
NAZZ
|
61.1984 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 12:58 | 8 |
| So when is the next Browns home game? Think Art Modell will be there to cheer
on his team?
I can't imagine the Browns will get the same fan support they've enjoyed in
the past, I'm wondering if there will be any type of protest by the fans
other than booing and waving nasty signs.
George
|
61.1985 | Art'll prolly miss this one, too | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:02 | 6 |
| *Sunday, Nov. 19
Green Bay at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
Should be fun, dontcha think.
TTom
|
61.1986 | Fans will show up | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:13 | 5 |
| I gotta believe that the Cleveland fans will come out to support the
players (they didn't move the team!), but Art better have that bullet
proof glass put up in the owners box by then.
UMDan
|
61.1987 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's pancake time! | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:16 | 5 |
| > So when is the next Browns home game? Think Art Modell will be there to cheer
>on his team?
No. He's already stated that he won't be attending any more home games
this year...
|
61.1988 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:22 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 61.1985 by HBAHBA::HAAS "graffiti limbo" >>>
>*Sunday, Nov. 19 Green Bay at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
>
>Should be fun, dontcha think.
That's for sure. If NBC runs it we could be talking Super Bowl numbers,
something like a 30 share.
Well ok, not that much but I'll bet a lot of people will tune in to see
what happens.
George
|
61.1989 | could happen | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:27 | 9 |
| Maybe not all that surprising, there are a lot of Browns fans and fan
clubs around this here way. So far, they haven't seen the humor in all
this.
Since this is so screwed up, I'm predicting that the Browns will beat
Pittsburgh mostly cause almost everyone is giving up immediately on this
year's model. The Browns then return and get whooped bad by the Packers.
TTom
|
61.1990 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:54 | 13 |
|
>> Well ok, not that much but I'll bet a lot of people will tune in to see
>> what happens.
A lot of people in Green Bay and Cleveland might tune in but most people
in the rest of the country won't even see it. There is still a season in
progress. With Modell stating that he won't attend any more home games
this season, we won't get to see how the fans react to him, making this
game even less interesting. The only point of interest outside the actual
game itself is just how many people there are in the stands. I hope they're
empty.
|
61.1991 | priorities | SALEM::DODA | Celts Motto:PlentyofGoodSeatsStillAvailable | Thu Nov 09 1995 17:45 | 9 |
| <<< Note 61.1990 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> I hope they're empty.
I doubt he cares since they're paid for anyway.
daryll
|
61.1992 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Nov 10 1995 07:59 | 5 |
| I wonder if they are hoping they are empty. If the fans come they'll be
none too happy. There is the possibility of a protest that turns into a riot.
Stranger things have happened.
George
|
61.1993 | BJOD | ASIC::CHARRON | time for a change | Wed Nov 15 1995 14:26 | 18 |
| I am usually READ only in here, but I heard a joke from a friend of
mine in Ohio the udder day that I thought people in here might get a
laugh out of.
You're in a room with Mohamar Khadafy, Sadaam Hussein, and Art Modell.
You have a gun and only two bullets. What do you do?
shoot Modell twice!
;)
/brian
|
61.1994 | ;-) | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Nov 15 1995 14:33 | 2 |
61.1995 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | I packed my John Lee Hooker | Wed Nov 15 1995 14:44 | 3 |
|
Have Modell's fingerprints on the weapon!!
|
61.1996 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Nov 15 1995 14:46 | 19 |
|
There are a lot of Modell jokes going around NE Ohio, most of them
_extremely_ nasty (see the end of this note for an example). People
are actively searching for ways to punish Modell - not just boycotting
the Browns, but boycotting business Modell has ties to, etc. A
number of players (incl Pepper Johnson) have also made remarks that
will eliminate any possibility they had of NE Ohio endorsements.
Kosar's made noise about bringing a team back to NE Ohio; an ownership
team led by Kosar would have _no_ trouble drawing fans, that's for
certain.
Joe
The "joke":
What's the difference between Adolf Hitler and Art Modell?
A mustache.
|
61.1997 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Nov 15 1995 16:18 | 5 |
| > are actively searching for ways to punish Modell
Joe H, what are the people of Ohio saying about the politicians ?
Seems to me they pushed the guy out of town after catering to the
Indians and the Cavs.
|
61.1998 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed Nov 15 1995 16:34 | 16 |
|
>Joe H, what are the people of Ohio saying about the politicians ?
>Seems to me they pushed the guy out of town after catering to the
>Indians and the Cavs.
I haven't _heard_ many complaints about the pols - it's
Modell whose scalp is sought.
IMHO, the pols _didn't_ push Modell out, and were in fact reasonably
accomidating - if not for a ridiculous offer from Baltimore, I don't
think Modell would have had any real incentive to leave. But
Baltimore's offer was _so_ far outside the bounds of what almost
any other city would offer a team to _stay_ that it was inevitable
someone bit...
Joe
|
61.1999 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Nov 16 1995 11:01 | 11 |
| > Baltimore's offer was _so_ far outside the bounds of what almost
> any other city would offer a team to _stay_ that it was inevitable
> someone bit...
And now Cleveland will pay MORE to get another team, when they could
have kept their beloved Browns.
Sorry, but I think the people in an existing NFL town (save Oakland)
usually drop the ball, and the politicians are the ones representing
the average Joe. Hopefully they'll wake up to that and take it out
on these bums come election time.
|
61.2000 | bend over | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 16 1995 11:04 | 10 |
| The Cleveland situation seems to be the typical bullsh*t going around
these days.
If'n you listen to Modell, he says he got screwed by the City.
If'n you listen to the City, they say they got screwed by Modell.
Meanwhile, all the fans - every fan - got screwed.
TTom
|
61.2001 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 16 1995 11:19 | 22 |
|
>> Sorry, but I think the people in an existing NFL town (save Oakland)
>> usually drop the ball, and the politicians are the ones representing
>> the average Joe. Hopefully they'll wake up to that and take it out
>> on these bums come election time.
For what? Not being crazy enough to spend a half a billion dollars
on a football team? I've read recently where Baltimore has the
highest teen pregnancy rate in the country and is in the top five
in other wonderful categories such as high school drop out rate.
It would seem that they have better things to spend their money
on than a football team. But that's how skewed values have gotten
to where we think that the guys who don't pay the greenmail are
the jerks not the greenmailers. When the Central divsion of the
AFC looks like it'll consist of big time burgs like Nashville,
Cincinnatti, Pittsburg, Jacksonville and Baltimore and meanwhile
two of the top ten biggest markets in the country (Houston and LA)
will be teamless clearly something is wrong with the way the
NFL and its owners do business. This will all blow up in their
faces and it'll happen sooner rather than later.
|
61.2002 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 16 1995 11:24 | 13 |
|
>And now Cleveland will pay MORE to get another team, when they could
>have kept their beloved Browns.
I'm not sure that's the case. I certainly hope it isn't.
IMHO, there's no reason the public should pay for anything more
than a stadium for a team, and if they _do_ pay for a stadium, there's
no reason the city _shouldn't_ be charging fair rent.
Of course, my views and reality are fast diverging....
Joe
|
61.2003 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 11:38 | 16 |
| Good or bad this is the way supply and demand works. Regardless of whether or
not we agree with the wisdom of spending this kind of money on a franchise it
appears that people in some cities are willing to pay more per capita for this
type of product than people in other cities.
Last year on Homicide (which is set in Baltimore) they had something that was
interesting. They showed one of their older characters (the one played by Ned
Beatty) really despondent over the loss of the Colts talking about how the
CFL wasn't real football.
I dismissed it as a general statement about old-timers and tradition at the
time but now I wonder if the writers of that show had done their homework and
were picking up on a popular public issue in Baltimore or if both the program
and the officials have misread the feelings of the taxpayers?
George
|
61.2004 | Lottery kings say don't poach on me | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Nov 16 1995 12:08 | 11 |
| Maybe George is more up than me on this or whoever but I get the
feeling that Finneran and Malone have a certain motivation of
protecting the state lottery interests for which they seem to be
wanting the lions share of the recreational budget. And the tracks and
casinos are not under the pols direct control and hiring.
Now whether they feel that sports dollars come out of the household
lottery budget I don't know. I do like the idea of an Ontario style
sports lottery to finance the new stadium (and foxboro-boston/outdoor-
indoor arguments aside it does look like a new stadium is necessary to
keep the Patriots.
|
61.2005 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Nov 16 1995 12:12 | 29 |
| > For what? Not being crazy enough to spend a half a billion dollars
> on a football team?
I don't know about 1/2 a billion, but from the reports I've read/heard,
Modell would have stayed had the city committed to renovating Municipal
Stadium a couple of years ago (luxury boxes). Cleveland put him on hold
but went ahead and built new stadiums for the Indians and the Cavs...and
also kicked-in on the Rock-n-Roll HoF.
I also heard that years ago Modell wanted to move the team out to the
'burbs, but Cleveland officials begged him not to, for the sake of
the inner city. He agreed.
The only argument I've heard in Cleveland's favor is that he put a
moratorium on talks with the city this summer, went and worked out
a deal with Baltimore, and didn't give Cleveland a chance (an
ultimatum).
To get another NFL team, they'll definitely have to build a stadium
(no new team will play in Municipal Stadium, renovated or not) and
also give them some cash (see St. Louis and Baltimore).
Dan-dorf on MNF said that history shows a city losing a team pays
twice as much to get a new one.
So the fans can scream at Modell, but I just don't believe that
a guy who spent 30 years in that city just walks out on 'em the
first time another city offers some bucks. If that were the case
he'd have been gone before this.
|
61.2006 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 12:34 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2004 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> Now whether they feel that sports dollars come out of the household
> lottery budget I don't know. I do like the idea of an Ontario style
> sports lottery to finance the new stadium (and foxboro-boston/outdoor-
> indoor arguments aside it does look like a new stadium is necessary to
> keep the Patriots.
In Massachusetts the lottery has the sole purpose of providing money to the
cities and towns. Last time I heard the numbers, which was a few years back, 50
cents on every dollar went for prizes, 45 cents went to the cities and towns,
and 5 cents went to run the lottery.
So I doubt they could use that money for building a stadium without a lot of
controversy over where the lottery dollars would be spent. What with Prop
2 1/2 still in effect cities and towns fight hard to keep what ever state
funding they receive.
George
|
61.2007 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 16 1995 12:36 | 12 |
|
>> So the fans can scream at Modell, but I just don't believe that
>> a guy who spent 30 years in that city just walks out on 'em the
>> first time another city offers some bucks. If that were the case
>> he'd have been gone before this.
It kind of reminds me of what Jerry Rice said in response to Deion's
lament that neither Rice nor Steve Young called him when he was trying
to decide between SF and Dallas. "Yean right," Jerry said "one call
from me and he's going to turn down 5 million dollars." Baltimore
made Modell and offer that he couldn't refuse and he didn't.
|
61.2008 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 16 1995 12:53 | 28 |
|
>I don't know about 1/2 a billion, but from the reports I've read/heard,
>Modell would have stayed had the city committed to renovating Municipal
>Stadium a couple of years ago (luxury boxes). Cleveland put him on hold
>but went ahead and built new stadiums for the Indians and the Cavs...and
>also kicked-in on the Rock-n-Roll HoF.
One second here...
_Cleveland_ didn't pay for the new stadiums (I don't know about their
involvement in the R&R HoF). The bulk of the new Stadia were payed
for through a sin tax. A sin tax which the people of Cleveland just
renewed to _make_ the renovations to the Stadium.
>To get another NFL team, they'll definitely have to build a stadium
>(no new team will play in Municipal Stadium, renovated or not) and
>also give them some cash (see St. Louis and Baltimore).
Goodness, I hope not. I can live with the idea of an expansion
team in Cleveland, but I sincerely hope they don't try to steal
someone else's team.
>Dan-dorf on MNF said that history shows a city losing a team pays
>twice as much to get a new one.
Twice as much as _what_?
Joe
|
61.2009 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 12:59 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2008 by ROCK::HUBER "From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls" >>>
>>Dan-dorf on MNF said that history shows a city losing a team pays
>>twice as much to get a new one.
>
> Twice as much as _what_?
I believe he said that it would cost twice as much to get a new team as
it would have cost to keep the old one.
As for an expansion team, the league is already about 8 teams too top
heavy. Adding more teams will only make this problem worse.
George
|
61.2010 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Nov 16 1995 13:13 | 11 |
|
> As for an expansion team, the league is already about 8 teams too top
>heavy. Adding more teams will only make this problem worse.
That all depends...
I'm sure the US could support 50 NFL teams, given the right
circumstances. The current situation, however, clearly wouldn't
work with 50...
Joe
|
61.2011 | which 8? | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 16 1995 13:15 | 0 |
61.2012 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 13:41 | 20 |
| Which 8 what?
I believe that considering the amount of money available from Box office and
TV there is enough money to support about 22-24 major league teams in Football
and Baseball. Beyond that they lose any natural stability and end up with some
teams that are very rich and others that are poor. This makes it almost
impossible for poor teams to remain competitive.
If there are only 2-3 poor teams then some sort of revenue sharing will work
but with 8-10 poor teams the only result can be chaos and disasters of the sort
we are seeing now.
My guess is that this round of musical cities for big local money will run
it's course and in the end they will realize they can't support that many
teams and the poorer teams will go belly up.
At any rate the very LAST thing the NFL or MLB needs right now is another
expansion. It will only make this situation worse.
George
|
61.2013 | what you said | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 16 1995 13:50 | 13 |
| > Which 8 what?
>Note 61.2009 CLEVELAND BROWNS 'DAWGS' 2009 of 2012
>ERICF::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" 14 lines 16-NOV-1995 12:59
...
> As for an expansion team, the league is already about 8 teams too top
>heavy. Adding more teams will only make this problem worse.
>
> George
These 8.
TTom
|
61.2014 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 16 1995 13:58 | 14 |
|
>> I believe that considering the amount of money available from
>> Box office and TV there is enough money to support about 22-24
>> major league teams in Football and Baseball.
As long as taxpayers are ready, willing and able to foot the bill
and as long as there is revenue sharing expansion in football will
be supported. The product on the field will be mediocre, as it is
getting to be now, but financially owners/teams won't suffer because
they always have the option of playing one city against another or
even have the suburbs get into the act to try and lure a team away.
NFL franchises don't go out of business. They just pick up and move to
greener pastures.
|
61.2015 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:03 | 26 |
| <<< Note 61.2013 by HBAHBA::HAAS "graffiti limbo" >>>
> Which 8?
I'm not sure what point you are trying to make. If you try to put a quart of
jelly beans in a half quart container, which ones don't belong there? I don't
know, I guess the half that spills over the top. But just because you don't
know which ones don't belong that doesn't mean you don't know a quart of jelly
beans won't fit in a half quart container.
With today's economics it appears to me that there is room for 22-24 teams in
the NFL and MLB. Any more than that and there starts to be too much of a
difference between rich teams and poor teams. The leagues become unstable and
it's impossible for everyone to be playing on an equal basis due to financial
instability.
If free market economics sort it out then I guess the poorest 8 teams would
be the ones to go belly up but who knows? The last time an established major
league cut back was in 1899 when the National League cut back from 12 to 8 and
in that case the smaller cities seemed to lose out. I believe it was
Louisville, Washington, Cleveland and Buffalo, with Washington and Cleveland
picking up AL teams two years later. But that was a long time ago when the
economics were very different from what they are today.
Who knows, there's no real way to tell which teams would go if they cut back.
George
|
61.2016 | carry on, then | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:04 | 5 |
| Sorry Goerge,
I mistakenly thought you were trying to make a point.
TTom
|
61.2017 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:09 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2014 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Plan 9 From Outer Space" >>>
> NFL franchises don't go out of business. They just pick up and move to
> greener pastures.
That's certainly what they seem to be doing right now but my feeling is that
this system is very unstable and won't last. Sooner or later the price of a
winning team will become too high for private interests and the public will
get tired of paying the bill for teams they can no longer remember or keep
track of.
Unstable system's just don't last, they either find a stable state or perish.
If that isn't a law of physics it probably should be.
George
|
61.2018 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:11 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2016 by HBAHBA::HAAS "graffiti limbo" >>>
>I mistakenly thought you were trying to make a point.
I am. The point I'm making is that this chaos is caused by the fact that the
leagues are too big.
Why is that not a point?
George
|
61.2019 | Can't have it both ways | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:33 | 12 |
|
>> I am. The point I'm making is that this chaos is caused by the
>> fact that the leagues are too big.
>> Why is that not a point?
It's a point but a completely unsupported one. If there were *8*
teams too many, you'd tend to think that the value of a franchise
would be going down not up. If as you said earlier that what we're
seeing is the law of supply and demand in action then in reality
there are too *few* teams under the current system. That's not a
point I agree with but that's where your logic is/was heading.
|
61.2020 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:40 | 12 |
| The law of supply and demand is based on what people are willing to pay at
the moment and has nothing to do with the wisdom of that decision or the
likelihood that the demand will remain.
I just don't see this system of higher and higher bidding going on forever
as the teams play musical cities. One of these days the music will stop and
there won't be any city willing to cough over the dough. When that happens
the leagues will shrink back to a more reasonable, competitive, and stable
size.
That's my prediction,
George
|
61.2021 | The Bad 8 | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:41 | 15 |
| Actually, I thought we might be getting to a point where we could vote on
which 8 we wanted to demote to the minors.
My choices and reasons would be:
Arizona - move you lose
Cleveland - move you lose
Detroit - even the fans don't like the team/coach/owner
Houston - try to move you lose
Indianapolis - move you lose
New Orleans - losers
Seattle - losers
Tampa Bay - losers
TTom
|
61.2022 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Thu Nov 16 1995 14:59 | 6 |
| Hard to believe the NY/NJ Jets and Giants don't fit
in there somewhere.
billl
|
61.2023 | could be more | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 16 1995 15:02 | 8 |
| I got no porblem with adding the Jets.
I thought about the Iggles, too but they're playing too good right now.
And I threw out the Raiders cause they're usually good.
Feel free to add to the list...
TTom
|
61.2024 | I ain't yet da keeper of da_list or dis_list | LANDO::FARLEY | | Thu Nov 16 1995 15:54 | 13 |
|
Yabbut,
Is jelly bean pouring a sport?
deen to wonk(tm)
;^)
I remain,
not liking the purple ones, though......
/kev
|
61.2025 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Thu Nov 16 1995 15:59 | 28 |
| > I just don't see this system of higher and higher bidding going on forever
> as the teams play musical cities. One of these days the music will stop and
> there won't be any city willing to cough over the dough. When that happens
> the leagues will shrink back to a more reasonable, competitive, and stable
> size.
That's an interesting prediction, but I don't think it's valid.
First, there's the assumption that the U.S. public is smart enought to
force teams to pay their own way. I don't give the public, through their
elected "leaders," that much credit. At least for the near future (next
10-20 years), I think that there will always be another market for an
established team -- unless the entire economy takes a significant
downturn (like the Depression, not like the mini-recessions we've seen
off and on again in the last 25 years).
Second, there's the assumption that the poorest teams are going to lose
significant amounts of money. I don't think there is any real evidence
they have, or that they will.
I do agree that the NFL is overexpanded. However, a scenario where they
cut back on the size of the league is extremely unlikely. More likely is
that the league will hire more bums, to replace slightly better, but higher
priced, players in the non-glamour positions. The NFL will accept putting
a mediocre product on the field rather than cutting back the number of teams
for one reason: they know the public will buy the product anyway.
The american sports consumer is not quality-conscious.
|
61.2026 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 16 1995 16:03 | 17 |
|
>> One of these days the music will stop and there won't be any city
>> willing to cough over the dough. When that happens the leagues will
>> shrink back to a more reasonable, competitive, and stable size.
>> That's my prediction,
I tend to think the same thing but I don't see it happening real
soon what with the backlog of cities lusting after franchises,
revenue sharing and some of the major markets still unrepresented
Just as the baseball strike didn't last just the two weeks that
you predicted it would, unless some action is taken either by the
government or the NFL itself the current state of flux will con-
tinue for the forseeable future with cities either ponying up
or losing their teams.
|
61.2027 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 16:12 | 13 |
| The baseball strike didn't last just two weeks the way I thought because I
didn't know that 1/3rd of the owners could veto an agreement. Had it been
majority rule I'm sure the strike would have been over quickly. The way they
were behaving looked to me as though they were really close to having the vote
go either way which would mean a majority wanted to settle.
Yeah, I agree it won't happen real soon but around the year 2000 something is
going to shake lose. I just don't see these huge leagues being stable enough to
last that long. Nowhere in history can I think of leagues this big ever
surviving for very long. Leagues need parity and there's no way to keep parity
in that large a league without some sort of outside funding.
George
|
61.2028 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Thu Nov 16 1995 16:16 | 15 |
| > Yeah,I agree it won't happen real soon but around the year 2000 something is
>going to shake lose. I just don't see these huge leagues being stable enough to
>last that long. Nowhere in history can I think of leagues this big ever
>surviving for very long. Leagues need parity and there's no way to keep parity
>in that large a league without some sort of outside funding.
>
> George
Nowhere in history can I think of where leagues this big ever failed to
survive. In fact, there is no precedent either way. Maybe that's why you
can't remember these things historically. (Chapter 1, Build A Straw Man ...)
Leagues don't need parity -- otherwise MLB would have died in the
30's and 40's, and the NBA would have died in the 70's. I'm not even sure
fans prefer parity, quite frankly.
|
61.2029 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 16:28 | 30 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2028 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R "Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon" >>>
> Nowhere in history can I think of where leagues this big ever failed to
> survive. In fact, there is no precedent either way. Maybe that's why you
> can't remember these things historically. (Chapter 1, Build A Straw Man ...)
There have been several times in history when new leagues have started and
failed long before reaching 30 teams total. Back in the 1870's the National
Association folded, in the 1880's the American Association folded with a few
teams jumping to the National League, in the teens the Federal League failed
and on an on. More often than not when the total number of major league teams
got to a certain level something gave.
It's different this time because the existing leagues are expanding rather
than a new league starting up and that got them further but the instability
we are seeing is there for the same reason. Only so many major league teams
are viable at one time.
> Leagues don't need parity -- otherwise MLB would have died in the
> 30's and 40's, and the NBA would have died in the 70's. I'm not even sure
> fans prefer parity, quite frankly.
The 30's and 40's were a weird time for Major League baseball because the
rules and laws allowed them to run a much more strict type of organization
than they ever ran before or can ever run again. They were able to hold costs
down like they never did before or since. That's why no team moved for 50 years
and no player could go shopping for a job. But free agency and the ability to
move teams are here to stay so artificial stability no longer stands a chance.
George
|
61.2030 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Thu Nov 16 1995 16:38 | 39 |
| > There have been several times in history when new leagues have started and
>failed long before reaching 30 teams total. Back in the 1870's the National
>Association folded, in the 1880's the American Association folded with a few
>teams jumping to the National League, in the teens the Federal League failed
>and on an on. More often than not when the total number of major league teams
>got to a certain level something gave.
You can speculate that those leagues folded because there were too many
teams, but I believe there were definately other reasons those teams/leagues
went down the tubes.
> It's different this time because the existing leagues are expanding rather
>than a new league starting up and that got them further but the instability
>we are seeing is there for the same reason. Only so many major league teams
>are viable at one time.
The instability is for a completely different reason. In this case, there
is instability because there is a great DEMAND for teams. Suppose that
after this next period of franchise shifting is complete, there are no
markets without franchises that want one. Do you really think that the
existing markets (which have paid a lot of money from their franchises, or
find that the franchises create a number of new local businesses) are going
to let their franchises shrivel up ? I don't think so.
>> Leagues don't need parity -- otherwise MLB would have died in the
>> 30's and 40's, and the NBA would have died in the 70's. I'm not even sure
>> fans prefer parity, quite frankly.
>
> The 30's and 40's were a weird time for Major League baseball because the
>rules and laws allowed them to run a much more strict type of organization
>than they ever ran before or can ever run again. They were able to hold costs
>down like they never did before or since. That's why no team moved for 50 years
>and no player could go shopping for a job. But free agency and the ability to
>move teams are here to stay so artificial stability no longer stands a chance.
It's true that the 30's and 40's were different than now -- of course, they
weren't any different than the 20's, teens, or 50's. Even so, that's no proof
that fans want parity. I don't believe that they necessarily want parity,
nor will be financially unsupportive of disparity.
|
61.2031 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 16:56 | 27 |
| <<< Note 61.2030 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R "Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon" >>>
> You can speculate that those leagues folded because there were too many
> teams, but I believe there were definately other reasons those teams/leagues
> went down the tubes.
The point is, there has never been a time when 30 major league baseball or
football teams have been able to survive. In fact before TV it was rare to see
a league with more than about 16 teams survive. Regardless of the reasons, the
economics have never been there to create a stable 30 team environment.
When TV came along the numbers jumped quickly to the low 20s and when the
big TV contracts of the 80s came along they jumped to the high 20s but now
that TV is cutting back and the leagues are expanding from the high 20s to
30 they are suddenly acting very unstable. Coincidence? Maybe but I doubt it.
> It's true that the 30's and 40's were different than now -- of course, they
> weren't any different than the 20's, teens, or 50's. Even so, that's no proof
> that fans want parity. I don't believe that they necessarily want parity,
> nor will be financially unsupportive of disparity.
Fans prove over and over again that they want parity. When ever teams fail to
remain competitive their fans shrink down and they are lucky to get 10,000
showing up at the park. With the exception of situations like the Mets and Cubs
very few teams can draw fans when they are not competitive.
George
|
61.2032 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Thu Nov 16 1995 17:09 | 9 |
| > Fans prove over and over again that they want parity. When ever teams fail to
>remain competitive their fans shrink down and they are lucky to get 10,000
>showing up at the park. With the exception of situations like the Mets and Cubs
>very few teams can draw fans when they are not competitive.
I agree that attendance will be lower for poorer teams; but, I don't believe
revenues will be so much lower that teams are going to fold. Moreover, with
expanded playoff opportunities, there will be fewer and fewer cases of teams
that are not at least occasionally competitive.
|
61.2033 | | SLEEPR::ACMS_TEST | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 16 1995 17:19 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2032 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R "Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon" >>>
> I agree that attendance will be lower for poorer teams; but, I don't believe
> revenues will be so much lower that teams are going to fold.
We'll see. I agree, not for a while but if this instability continues it
will turn fans off to the sports in general and they will be dividing even
a smaller pie. Maybe something new will come along. Hope so.
>Moreover, with
> expanded playoff opportunities, there will be fewer and fewer cases of teams
> that are not at least occasionally competitive.
Yes, but because of the high costs teams will have to spend a great deal more
money to be competitive on those occasions and the teams in weak markets will
really suffer.
George
|
61.2034 | Lousy hockey at an exorbitant price and they still pay | SALEM::DODA | Milk the Beatles | Thu Nov 16 1995 17:56 | 7 |
| <<< Note 61.2020 by SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI "Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs" >>>
> The law of supply and demand is based on what people are willing to pay at
>the moment and has nothing to do with the wisdom of that decision or the
>likelihood that the demand will remain.
to wit, Bruins fans.
|
61.2035 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Nov 17 1995 08:29 | 9 |
| You could also look at that "before TV" thing as a travel-based reason also.
Before 1957, the National and American leagues were east of St. Louis.
More teams would have resulted in more travel, and travel was harder back then,
primarily by train......
|
61.2036 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Fri Nov 17 1995 08:37 | 1 |
| And his name's not "Cam"! He doesn't have that kind of money... :-) :-) :-)
|
61.2037 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Nov 17 1995 08:57 | 7 |
| >
>And his name's not "Cam"! He doesn't have that kind of money... :-) :-) :-)
>
People make that mistake a lot... I get tired of saying anything so I
usually just let it go....
|
61.2039 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Fri Nov 17 1995 10:50 | 5 |
| How does it look close up, Karen?
billl
|
61.2040 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Nov 17 1995 11:03 | 12 |
| >
> How does it look close up, Karen?
>
Cam's nose flares to the west. Pretty dramatically.
Mine has been broken, and something inside displaced slightly, courtesy of my
days on the rugby pitch, but it was a minor mishap, not, apparently, with the
same effect on Cam.
'Saw
|
61.2042 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Nov 17 1995 11:29 | 6 |
| > Thanks for saving me from having to answer that. (-;
Anytime Karen.
If they'd been talking about Don Sweeney, I'd have left it up to you....
|
61.2043 | shame, shame | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Fri Nov 17 1995 11:36 | 11 |
| I am disappointed that our "beloved" Browns fans,
Hal and Groaner, have not had the gonads to jump in
here.
Hail, JaKe, via net, has posted more notes in SPROTS
lately than those two.
billl
|
61.2044 | And base salary caps on the league you're in | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Fri Nov 17 1995 11:58 | 17 |
| Seems to me the English Soccer leagues do it right. Only 20 teams in
the Premier league, and the bottom four get relegated to the First
Division, while the top four in that league move up.
I suggest adding six more expansion teams to reach 36. Have two
leagues of 18 each. Splite each league into two nine team divisions.
Play everybody else once - 17 games. Top four teams in each division
make playoffs. Bottom team in each division plus the team with the
next worst record get relegated.
Any team that has moved its franchise in the past 20 years
automatically starts in the lower league. All expansion teams in the
last dozen years start in the lower league, as well as any sh*t team
the ::SPROTS noters want to send down.
NAZZ
|
61.2045 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Fri Nov 17 1995 13:21 | 3 |
61.2046 | how's this taste? | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Nov 29 1995 18:20 | 11 |
| re .1750:
> With or without Vinnie they'll have to play the Steelers twice --
> sorry, but the Steelers won't make it out of the Wild Card round,
> so Cleveland will only get to go 2-0 v.s. them this year.
Hey, Groaner, any comment?
billl
|
61.2047 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Nov 29 1995 18:24 | 16 |
| re .1774:
> Preseason predictions -
> Browns will go 10-6 or 11-5.
> Browns will win the AFC Central.
> Browns will make it to the AFC Championship game.
> Ernest Hunter will surprise the league at RB.
> Pittsburgh will eek out a wild card bid.
Me thinks someone needs to do some serious
dining at the Cafe le Crow Negro!
billl
|
61.2048 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 30 1995 07:24 | 3 |
61.2049 | Lame! | SHARE::DERRY | Color me impressed... | Thu Nov 30 1995 07:35 | 1 |
| Aren't they playing SD this week?
|
61.2050 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 30 1995 14:01 | 2 |
61.2051 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 30 1995 14:32 | 11 |
| If they are not the Browns what are they? They don't become the Baltimore
Browns until next year and maybe not even then.
I read that about a week ago a state court in Ohio granted the city of
Cleveland a preliminary injunction preventing the Browns from moving until the
case goes to trial. There are some problems with the case however since it's
not clear that the city of Cleveland was party to the contract. There may
also be some jurisdictional issues. Since Baltimore is involved the case may
have to be moved to a Federal court.
George
|
61.2052 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Thu Nov 30 1995 14:37 | 3 |
|
If I'm Bill Long and I hear this kind of "they're not the Browns" talk, I
smell some bet welshing on the horizon...
|
61.2053 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 30 1995 14:41 | 5 |
61.2054 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 30 1995 14:43 | 7 |
|
>> I read that about a week ago a state court in Ohio granted the
>> city of Cleveland a preliminary injunction preventing the Browns
Tagliabue has also gone before Congress and asked for legislation
enabling the NFL to regulate franchise moves without the liability
of anti-trust suits.
|
61.2055 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Thu Nov 30 1995 14:46 | 8 |
| >Bottom line, Art doesn't decide to move the team and the
> Browns win the AFC Central. No questions asked.
Of course not. How can you ask any of a purely hypothetical situation?
The Megaplex discussion really affected the Patriots at the beginning of the
year, too. No such uncertainty, and they win the AFC East. No questions
asked. :-)
|
61.2056 | End result - rich get richer | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Nov 30 1995 14:54 | 7 |
| One would think this would be a no-brainer for Congress since it
involves local governments competing against themselves to make greedy
owners richer at the expense of tax payers. I would hope they'd have
enough sense to spread the wealth around to the benefit of hard working
folks who'd like to see a game live who are being priced out.
That said - I have very little hope.
|
61.2057 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Running down a dream | Thu Nov 30 1995 15:02 | 3 |
|
I wonder why Baltimore would want the Browns. They have the CFL Grey
Cup champs now. Why would they want the perennial 2nd place or worse Browns?
|
61.2058 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Nov 30 1995 15:54 | 3 |
61.2059 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 30 1995 16:04 | 25 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2056 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> One would think this would be a no-brainer for Congress since it
> involves local governments competing against themselves to make greedy
> owners richer at the expense of tax payers.
This being a conservative congress I would think that they would be reluctant
to regulate a business like pro football and would suggest that if tax payers
were not happy with the way local government was managing their money then
they should vote for someone else to hold office.
>I would hope they'd have
> enough sense to spread the wealth around to the benefit of hard working
> folks who'd like to see a game live who are being priced out.
Here again, this is not the Republican way. Newt and company detest any
sort of wealth distribution and prefer to keep government out of the affairs
of businessmen. And I don't see Clinton expending any political capital on an
issue like Football.
The political winds blowing the way they are my guess is that Congress will
tell professional football to work out their own problems and will tell tax
payers to take responsibility for whom they elect to local government.
George
|
61.2060 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Thu Nov 30 1995 16:58 | 10 |
| > I will honor my wagers, so Bill Long doesn't have to be drumming up
> support. Bottom line, Art doesn't decide to move the team and the
> Browns win the AFC Central. No questions asked.
I don't recall "Art moving the team" being part
of that wager.
billl
|
61.2061 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Thu Nov 30 1995 17:01 | 10 |
| > The political winds blowing the way they are my guess is that
>Congress will tell professional football to work out their own
>problems and will tell tax payers to take responsibility for whom
>they elect to local government.
Call me crazy, but I don't see anything wrong with any of that.
billl
|
61.2062 | Second the motion, Billl | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Fri Dec 01 1995 07:52 | 11 |
| > The political winds blowing the way they are my guess is that Congress will
>tell professional football to work out their own problems and will tell tax
>payers to take responsibility for whom they elect to local government.
You don't have to be a conservative to feel this way. I'm not and I do.
The temptation is almost overpowering to move to Baltimore just for the
pleasure of voting and campaigning against the idiots who handed Art
Modell the key to the city vaults.
Steve
|
61.2063 | words of wisdom from the 'burgh | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Fri Dec 01 1995 16:58 | 15 |
| Tell Groaner and HAL that they will be welcome on the STEELER
bandwagon with open arms as long as they have their lobotomies
reversed and get castrated so's they don't try to hump the
STEELER fans legs the way that Brown(spots)s(tm) fans are known
to dry hump anything they can wrap their arms around.
Bummer that there will no longer be the great rivalry, but
Clevescum don't deserve no NFL team. The thing I like is that
Clevescum will be able to say they have NEVER won a Super Bowl,
ever never!! HAHAHAHAHAHA
You cain post this in SPROTS, just remove the address, please.
JaKe
|
61.2064 | Groaner, I'm ashamed of you! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Dec 05 1995 09:24 | 39 |
| I kinda figured something like this would happen....
Given (.1794):
> Okay Groaner, it's time to put up or shutup.
>If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the division you must
>wear "I've always been a closet Steeler fan" until the Monday
>following the Super Bowl.
>If'n the Browns clinch (fat chance) I'll do the same.
>Knowing your traditional disappearing act happens as soon as
>the Browns are out of it, this shouldn't be too painful for you.
>billl
and (.1803)
>Okay, i'm in
Hard to beleive Groaner would enter eight notes yesterday,
a full 20 hours after the Steelers clinched the AFC Central,
Not a one of them had the agreed upon "I've always been
a closet Steeler fan" p-name.
There are several possible explanations for this:
1) he didn't know the Steelers clinched (Yeah right)
2) he forgot about the wager which I reminded him
of last week (not a chance)
3) he decided to try an welch on the bet (probably)
billl
|
61.2065 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Dec 05 1995 09:41 | 8 |
|
> 1) he didn't know the Steelers clinched (Yeah right)
I wouldn't bet against this. I know that I've completely lost
interest in the NFL this year, and couldn't have told you that the
Steelers had clinched...
Joe
|
61.2066 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Dec 05 1995 10:45 | 3 |
61.2067 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Dec 05 1995 10:54 | 9 |
| Excuses, excuses.
In this illustrious Teamlinks Notes I can't see
what's there after the "I've always been a closet
Steeler fan" part of your p-name, but if it detracts
from the intent get it the hell out of there.
billl
|
61.2068 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Dec 05 1995 11:05 | 10 |
| Well, I can vouch for two teams clinching.
On Sunday evening's ESPN Prime Time, they reported that three teams had a
chance to clinch on Sunday: Dallas, KC, Pittsburgh. Only two did.
Dallas lost to Washington and thus did not clinch the NFC East. The other two
teams won and clinched.
'Saw
|
61.2069 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Dec 05 1995 12:47 | 3 |
61.2070 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Dec 05 1995 12:50 | 10 |
| like I said...I can't see the whole thing on my
system, just that there is more added on after the
agreed upon characters.
Why not just tell me what it says and I'll be the
judge of "nuff said".
billl
|
61.2071 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Tue Dec 05 1995 13:57 | 5 |
| <<< Note 61.2069 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI
"I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!" >>>
Does this help ?
|
61.2072 | Time for another trial? | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Dec 05 1995 14:13 | 20 |
| > <<< Note 61.2069 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI
> "I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even
> though they suck!" >>>
> Does this help ?
That's what I thought.
Groaner, is it seriously your intention to not
live up to our wager? Aren't you the one who
dubbed TCM "The Crazy Welcher" when he did not
live up to a p-name wager?
No amount of your cheap basketball cards is gonna
make up for this lack of cajones!
billl
|
61.2073 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:19 | 2 |
61.2074 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:24 | 16 |
| ><<< Note 61.2073 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!" >>>
>
>
> I did live up to the wager. You can not deny it.
In the letter of the wager if not the spirit.
I have to say, I think this one ranks up there with Bob Hunt's setting up of
the p-name on one node, and then noting from another for the course of the
week....
8^)
|
61.2075 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:25 | 3 |
61.2076 | Take it like a man! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:31 | 5 |
| Groaner-the-Welcher, you're a wimp!
billl
|
61.2077 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:33 | 3 |
61.2078 | Groaner-the-Welcher | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:42 | 5 |
| What do I exect...like owner - like fans!
billl
|
61.2079 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:48 | 3 |
61.2080 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Dec 05 1995 15:50 | 4 |
| Didn't Bradshaw, Franko Harris, and that bunch win the Superbowl a couple
times back in the 70's?
George
|
61.2081 | a new low for even Groaner | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Gronowski = Welcher Extraordinaire | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:05 | 10 |
| Just remember, your integrity, what little you
ever posessed, is a measure of your word.
When you find ways to renege on something as
simple as the intent of a p-name wager, one can
only wonder how low you would stoop on anything
of a serious nature.
billl
|
61.2082 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:06 | 30 |
| SHEESH... Take it like a man...
FYI The only team that Clinched anything was Pittsburg, and the Cowboys
could not have clinched... Had they won 11-2, they could have still
ended up 11-5 tied with philly (1-1 head to head and Philly would have
won the Tie Breaker on NFC record). These announcers kill me they
don't elimanate a team until its outright impossible but they try and
HYPE up games that include SF/DAl etc saying they can clinch. Pitt has
the AFC Central (Ya thats tough swap The Steelers and the Pats and the
pats are in 1st place, same for every other team in the afc east/west
with the exception of the jets).
If your not going to live up to PName bets don't make em.... As for
cleveland moving I don't see why an owner should be kept from making
extra bread by moving the team when players up and change teams weekly
for more $$$. If you can't stop a player from doing it why should they
create a law stopping teams/owner's from doing it. And don't think the
same thing that the Browns did doesn't happen every day. My Uncle's
companay (IN Mass won't give there name) employs thousands of people
in massachusetts and was going to up and move to tennesee unless Mass
gave them some HUGE tax breaks, last I knew they managed to BLACK MAIL
Mass into giving them the breaks so they would stay instate....
Put up or Shut up, cleveland could have gave him a counter offer, they
could have improved his stadium but chose to take care of Basketball
and baseball in front of football... I guess they'll pay the ultimate
price and lose there NFL Franshise... Model is not who CLEVELAND should
be mad at, get angry with all the greedy athlete's who pushed it to
this point and be mad at themselves for putting football 3rd behind
basketball and baseball...
|
61.2083 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:11 | 5 |
| Is that a classic Groaner move or what? too funny
Groaner is the KING OF ALL LOOPHOLES
Jimbo
|
61.2084 | HTH's | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:13 | 4 |
|
BTW I was the one who gave TCM the TCW moniker. He was a welcher too
just like Groaner!!!
|
61.2085 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Gronowski = Welcher Extraordinaire | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:13 | 9 |
| >> Pitt has the AFC Central (Ya thats tough swap The Steelers
>> and the Pats and the pats are in 1st place, same for every
>> other team in the afc east/west with the exception of the jets).
Ya right! Go back to your hero worship of His Airness.
billl
|
61.2086 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Gronowski = Welcher Extraordinaire | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:15 | 9 |
| I wasn't sure if it was you, Chappy, or Groaner.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Has anyone seen Groaner and TCM in the same place?
billl
|
61.2087 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:20 | 8 |
| > <<< Note 61.2082 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
>
> FYI The only team that Clinched anything was Pittsburg, and the Cowboys
> could not have clinched...
FYI, KC clinched by beating Oakland. Moreover, with a victory the
Cowboys would have clinched, as Philly could do no better than tie,
and Cowboys win on third tie-breaking (common opponents, I believe).
|
61.2088 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:36 | 2 |
61.2089 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:46 | 6 |
61.2090 | Bill's the main! | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:53 | 23 |
|
Note from bill when I asked for clarification on the Pname bet...
<<< Note 61.1805 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all..." >>>
> Kevin,
>
> I ain't no Clevescumite! I would never do something as
> dastardly as that. ;^)
>
> I actually noticed that after I posted it, but knew there
> was no way I could stand the abuse I would take in here
> if I was to welch on the intent of a p-name bet.
>
>
> billl
Groaner, be prepared for abuse for welching on the intent.
Kevin
|
61.2091 | Proof! | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Dec 05 1995 16:57 | 29 |
|
The original pname challenge:
> <<< Note 61.1794 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all..." >>>
> -< let the p-name wagers begin! >-
>
> Okay Groaner, it's time to put up or shutup.
>
> If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the division you must
> wear "I've always been a closet Steeler fan" until the Monday
> following the Super Bowl.
>
> If'n the Browns clinch (fat chance) I'll do the same.
>
> Knowing your traditional disappearing act happens as soon as
> the Browns are out of it, this shouldn't be too painful for you.
>
>
> billl
Now, Bill said that Hal's pname had to be "I've always been a closet
Steeler fan". Not "I've always been a closet Steeler fan .....".
You lose Groaner. Be a main.
Kevin
|
61.2092 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Gronowski = Welcher Extraordinaire | Tue Dec 05 1995 17:02 | 15 |
| extracted from .1794:
If'n (I mean 'When') the Steelers 'clinch' the
division you must wear "I've always been a closet
Steeler fan" until the Monday following the Super Bowl.
Notice the quotes (beginning and ending).
Do what you want, Groaner, you've shown me your true color -
YELLOW
billl
|
61.2093 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 06 1995 08:48 | 14 |
| RE<<< Note 61.2089 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck!" >>>
> To my knowledge, the Steelers have never won and NFL championship.
Groner, I really don't care about this pname thing I'm just trying to
understand what you mean by this statement.
Didn't the Steelers have a dominant team in the late 70's that won a few
Superbowls? That team with Terry Bradshaw, Franco Harris, Mean Joe Green,
Stalworth, Rockey Bliar ... who else ...
Didn't they win NFL championships?
George
|
61.2094 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Wed Dec 06 1995 08:56 | 3 |
61.2095 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Dec 06 1995 09:00 | 9 |
| Who told you that?
I guess that for the first 4 years it was a playoff between the NFL and AFL
champion but since the merger along about Superbowl V it's been the NFL
championship game.
If it's not the NFL championship game what is?
George
|
61.2096 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Dec 06 1995 09:09 | 5 |
| What it is is the same old baloney that goes on in here all the time.
Give it a rest guys. It's so old.
You're all creative people -- can't you find a NEW angle to dazzle us with????
|
61.2097 | Too early to concentrate on Basketball... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 06 1995 10:31 | 21 |
| (BILL)
I wasn't kiddin about swapping the Pats or any other AFC team with
pittsburg. If you look at (Buf, Indy, Mia, Pats, KC, Oak, Den, SD
or Sea) they all have a better record then Cinncy, Hous, Clev or
jack. So like I said winning the AFC central this early is not a
HUGE deal, the division SIPS. Pitt has a winning record outside of
there division (3-2) but 6 of there wins (Should have been 8) came
vs the expansion division (Jac, brand new, clev soon to be balt, Hou
soon to be Tenn and Im sure Cinncy will move too...).
Pittsburg is one of the top 5 in the afc but anyone of 24other teams
in the NFL could win that division this year, Id say Arz, NYG and
Was are all better teams then the AFC Central as well.
Who would have Thunk it... Baltimore could have the 1st pick in the
draft next year :-) Jets have NE, Hou and NO so they could win another
and all Baltimore has to do is lose to Jacksonville in WK17 (and lose
WK15, 16) and they'll get the 1st pick :-)
mab
|
61.2098 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Dec 06 1995 11:27 | 3 |
61.2099 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | A day in infamy | Wed Dec 06 1995 12:02 | 5 |
| And you would expect differently from him?
billl
|
61.2100 | SKIDMARK SNARF | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Dec 06 1995 14:32 | 1 |
61.2101 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Wed Dec 06 1995 19:13 | 8 |
|
Boy, now I'm confused. This year the NFL is playing in Superbowl XXX
(that's 30 for Roman Numeral Illiterates) It will be played in 1996,
so Superbowl I, must have been in 1967. The Steelers won *4*
superbowls since that year. How could anyone say they haven't won one?
Marc
|
61.2102 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | A day in infamy | Thu Dec 07 1995 09:16 | 7 |
| Marc,
You have to consider the source, Welchowski(tm).
billl
|
61.2103 | Rollward... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Dec 07 1995 09:25 | 4 |
|
Welchowski.... :-)
|
61.2104 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Dec 08 1995 13:53 | 20 |
| Now now now.. Here in NewEngland were somewhat spoiled with the
Celtics bringing oh so many championships to the area. But when you
live in some other cities (Wont mention any names) you have to
really REACH (I MEAN REACH) in order to come up with examples of
a winning team. Won guy use to brag about winning the championship
in Foozeball, or was it table tennis... It was one of those wannabe
sports. Back before the superbowl when the had 2 teams in the league
they called it the NFL(Neighborhood Football League) Championship and
the Cleveland Browns won a few of them vs teams like the VFW Vets,
xxx state pee wee champs and some other quality teams....
When you talk/think about the greatest teams in Football History to
me only 3 come to mind, Steelers, Cowboys and (HATE TO ADMIT THIS 1)
The 49ers. I know GB won the 1st 2 SB's but I put these 3 teams
ahead of them (Sorry packer fans).
If I had to pick which teams was the best of all time I think giving
that Pittsburg won like 3or4 over a 4-5 years stretch Id have to say
that was the best Team/Coaching Staff/etc every in Football... or maybe
the 1995 PATRIOTS :-)
|
61.2105 | or was it '73 and '74? - the mind fades | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Dec 08 1995 14:10 | 5 |
| Actually, the Steelers won SuperBowls in '74,'75,
'78 and '79.
billl
|
61.2106 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Dec 08 1995 14:15 | 5 |
| Im glad someone else can't remember, ALL I could remember for sure
was it was definatly 4, all were in the 70's and no 3peats. Just
out of curiosity does anyone know if a good chunk of the 1st Pitt
SB team was still around for the 4rth one ????
MaB
|
61.2107 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Dec 08 1995 14:46 | 6 |
| Actually checked after I posted...
I was right at first: 74,75,78 and 79.
billl
|
61.2108 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Fri Dec 08 1995 15:15 | 3 |
61.2109 | Hmm.. | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Dec 08 1995 15:37 | 5 |
| Boy I just know Im going to regret this... but... .WHAT ??? Im
very confused by that last statement ? The Celtics have always
been the celtics ? And the Celtics were competative and won in
the 80's as well (no one hit wonder).
mab
|
61.2110 | smoke, mirrors, technicalities... | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Fri Dec 08 1995 16:27 | 17 |
| The Celtics owners of some years past 'traded' franchises with what was
then the Buffalo Braves [?]. It was how the Celtics came to enjoy the
services of Bob McAdoo, Ernie D., and I think perhaps Curtis Rowe
and/or Marvin Barnes. Then, the Buffalo owner re-located the team to
[originally San Deigo then to?] LA.
So on a technicality, the statement is correct. What is also correct,
is that Boston still has an NBA basketball club called the Celtics, who
retained the banners to be hung in the rafters of the Boston Garden
[and subsequently moved to the Fleet Center].
It is appropriate to note that all those old Celtics numbers that have
been retired still remain in Boston, not in LA. Some Clipper can wear
numbers 6 or 33 or a bunch of others that the current Celtics players
can not.
Ted
|
61.2111 | Super Bowl [or NFL Championship..whatever] history | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY!! | Fri Dec 08 1995 16:32 | 55 |
| Twenty different teams have participated in the Super Bowl games.
Their super records:
San Francisco 5-0 Kansas City 1-1
Pittsburgh 4-0 Miami 2-3
Green Bay 2-0 New England 0-1
N.Y. Giants 2-0 Philadelphia 0-1
N.Y. Jets 1-0 L.A. Rams 0-1
Chicago 1-0 San Diego 0-1
Oakland 3-1 Cincinnati 0-2
Washington 3-2 Buffalo 0-4
Dallas 4-3 Minnesota 0-4
Baltimore 1-1 Denver 0-4
The average margin of victory has been 16.9 points. Twenty-two
games were decided by 10 or more points. Only 3 games were decided
by a field-goal or less; 4 others were decided by a touchdown or
less and more than a field-goal.
Super Bowl History
1967 Super Bowl I Green Bay 35, Kansas City 10
1968 Super Bowl II Green Bay 34, Oakland 14
1969 Super Bowl III New York Jets 16, Baltimore 7
1970 Super Bowl IV Kansas City 23, Minnesota 7
1971 Super Bowl V Baltimore 16, Dallas 13
1972 Super Bowl VI Dallas 23, Miami 3
1973 Super Bowl VII Miami 14, Washington 7
1974 Super Bowl VIII Miami 24, Minnesota 10
1975 Super Bowl IX Pittsburgh 16, Minnesota 6
1976 Super Bowl X Pittsburgh 21, Dallas 17
1977 Super Bowl XI Oakland 34, Minnesota 14
1978 Super Bowl XII Dallas 27, Denver 10
1979 Super Bowl XIII Pittsburgh 35, Dallas 31
1980 Super Bowl XIV Pittsburgh 34, Los Angeles Rams 19
1981 Super Bowl XV Oakland 27, Philadelphia 10
1982 Super Bowl XVI San Francisco 23, Cincinnati 21
1983 Super Bowl XVII Washington 27, Miami 17
1984 Super Bowl XVIII Oakland 38, Washington 9
1985 Super Bowl XIX San Francisco 38, Miami 16
1986 Super Bowl XX Chicago 46, New England 10
1987 Super Bowl XXI New York Giants 39, Denver 20
1988 Super Bowl XXII Washington 42, Denver 10
1989 Super Bowl XXIII San Francisco 20, Cincinnati 16
1990 Super Bowl XXIV San Francisco 55, Denver 10
1991 Super Bowl XXV New York Giants 20, Buffalo 19
1992 Super Bowl XXVI Washington 37, Buffalo 24
1993 Super Bowl XXVII Dallas 52, Buffalo 17
1994 Super Bowl XXVIII Dallas 30, Buffalo 13
1995 Super Bowl XXIX San Francisco 49, San Diego 26
Winner total 895, Loser total 406
Winner avg. 30.9, Loser avg. 14.0
|
61.2112 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Fri Dec 08 1995 16:35 | 8 |
61.2113 | The latest move I've heard... | FABSIX::E_MAXWELL | The Land Of The Stainless Maiden | Fri Dec 08 1995 21:34 | 7 |
| Anybody like the latest rumor?? tampa bay to cleveland.
The t.b. owner isn't happy with the way the city is not
showing support to keep them there. The cleveland buccaneers,
the baltimore browns, what a joke. Does this mean the groaner
will become a bucs fan? Or will he jump ship to baltimore?;-)
Lil Ed
|
61.2114 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Dec 08 1995 22:38 | 5 |
|
_If_ it happens, expect the Bucs to take the Browns name, colors,
etc.
Joe
|
61.2115 | I doubt it | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Dec 11 1995 11:07 | 5 |
|
Cleveland would be getting a better team if the deal goes through....
Will they also switch divisional alignments?
mike
|
61.2116 | | NQOS01::nqsrv324.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Mon Dec 11 1995 12:45 | 2 |
| No, Paul, by your distorted logic, the Browns will be in Baltimore. However,
everyone else will believe them to be in Cleveland.
|
61.2117 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Mon Dec 11 1995 18:02 | 4 |
61.2118 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Mon Jan 08 1996 12:03 | 6 |
|
Mel Kiper has the Browns selecting Lawrence Phillips with the #4
pick in the draft. His 1st four picks are Keyshawn Johnson #1, Kevin
Hurdy LB #2, Jonathan Ogden OL #3.
Ron
|
61.2119 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Mon Jan 08 1996 12:30 | 4 |
| > Mel Kiper has the Browns selecting Lawrence Phillips with the #4
> pick in the draft.
Art Modell gets what he deserves...
|
61.2120 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Mon Jan 08 1996 14:09 | 4 |
61.2121 | load 'em up | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 09 1996 10:04 | 6 |
| > ... They need a big time
> running back.
Yeah, to help pack the moving van.
TTom
|
61.2122 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Jan 09 1996 17:37 | 12 |
61.2123 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Jus scuttle buttin with StevieRay | Tue Jan 09 1996 17:54 | 4 |
|
If he sells, is the buyer bond to stay in Cleveland? If not sell to
his brother for a dollas and have him move it etc;
|
61.2124 | I have to force myself to pull my punches here, actually... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 09 1996 18:06 | 11 |
|
> He's committed suicide basically.
Well, Modell is an old man, and has lived a full life of vileness
and putrescence. Very similar to Tiger Bob Irsay, just hanging on
after that very unfortunate heart attack. Of course the bad news
for Baltimore Colts fans is that that psychopath (unlike Modell,
Irsay had/has documented behavioral problems) has progeny...
glenn
|
61.2125 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Wed Jan 10 1996 09:00 | 6 |
| > Of course the bad news
> for Baltimore Colts fans is that that psychopath (unlike Modell,
> Irsay had/has documented behavioral problems) has progeny...
Unlike his father, Jim Irsay has only displayed incompetence, not serious
behavioral problems...
|
61.2126 | The Raven(s) | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Apr 29 1996 10:47 | 129 |
| The Raven(s), with apologies to Edgar Allan Poe
Once upon a midnight dreary, while they pondered, weak and weary,
Over many a quaint and curious kegs of bitters that they poured,
While they nodded, nearly napping, suddenly there came a tapping,
As of someone gently rapping, rapping at their bar room door.
" 'Tis some visitor," they muttered, "tapping at our bar room door;
Only this, and nothing more."
How distinctly they remember, it was in the bleak December,
And each separate dying ember wrought its ghost upon the floor.
Eagerly they wished the morrow; vainly they had sought to borrow
From their keg surcease of sorrow, sorrow for the shirts they wore,
For the rare and treasured team the owners sent to Baltimore
Nameless here forevermore.
And the silken sad uncertain rustling of each purple curtain
Thrilled them---filled them with fantastic terrors never felt before;
So that now, to still the beating of their heart, they stood repeating,
" 'Tis some visitor entreating entrance at their bar room door,
Some late visitor entreating entrance at their bar room door.
This it is, and nothing more."
Presently their soul grew stronger; hesitating then no longer,
"Sir," they said , "or madam, truly your forgiveness we implore;
But the fact is, we were napping, and so gently you came rapping,
And so faintly you came tapping, tapping at our bar room door,
That we scarce were sure we heard you." Here they opened wide the door;---
Darkness there, and nothing more.
Deep into the darkness peering, long they stood there, wondering, fearing
Doubting, dreaming dreams no mortals ever dared to dream before;
But the silence was unbroken, and the stillness gave no token,
And the only word there spoken was the whispered "Baltimore"
This they whispered, and an echo murmured back of
"Baltimore", Merely this, and nothing more.
Back into the bar room turning, all their soul within them burning,
Soon again they heard a tapping, something louder than before,
"Surely," said they, "surely, that is something at the window lattice.
Let us see, then, what it is, and this mystery explore.
Let our hearts be still a moment, and this mystery explore.
" 'Tis the wind, and nothing more."
Open here they flung the shutter, when, with many a flirt and flutter,
In there stepped a stately raven, of the saintly days of yore.
Not the least obeisance made he; not a minute stopped or stayed he;
But with mien of lord or lady, perched above their bar room door.
Perched upon a bust of Modell, just above their bar room door,
Perched, and sat, and nothing more.
Then this ebony bird beguiling their sad fancy into smiling,
By the grave and stern decorum of the countenance it wore,
"Though thy crest be shorn and shaven thou," they said, "art sure no craven,
Ghastly, grim, and ancient raven, wandering from the nightly shore.
Tell us what the lordly name is on the Night's Plutonian shore."
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore."
Much they marveled this ungainly fowl to hear discourse so plainly,
Though its answer little meaning, little relevancy bore;
For we cannot help agreeing that no living human being
Ever yet was blessed with seeing bird above his bar room door,
Bird or beast upon the sculptured bust above his bar room door,
With such name as "Nevermore."
But the raven, sitting lonely on that placid bust, spoke only
That one word, as if his soul in that one word he did outpour.
Nothing further then he uttered; not a feather then he fluttered;
Till they scarcely more than muttered,"Other friends have flown before;
On the morrow he will leave us, as their hopes have flown before."
Then the bird said,"Nevermore."
Startled at the stillness broken by reply so aptly spoken,
"Doubtless," said they, "what it utters is its only stock and store,
Caught from some unhappy master, whom unmerciful disaster
Followed fast and followed faster, till his songs one burden bore,---
Till the dirges of his hope that melancholy burden bore
Of "Never---nevermore."
But the raven still beguiling all their fancy into smiling,
Straight they wheeled on cushioned seats in front of bird and bust and door;,
Then, upon the velvet sinking, they betook themselves to linking
Fancy unto fancy, thinking what this ominous bird of yore,
What this grim, ungainly, ghastly, gaunt, and ominous bird of yore
Meant in croaking, "Nevermore."
Thus they sat engaged in guessing, but no syllable expressing
To the fowl, whose fiery eyes now burned into their bosom's core;
This and more they sat divining, with their heads at ease reclining
On the cushion's velvet lining that the TV gloated o'er,
But whose velvet violet lining with the TV gloating o'er
shall be pressed, ah, nevermore!
Then, they thought, the air grew denser, perfumed from an unseen censer
Swung by seraphim whose footfalls tinkled on the tufted floor.
"Wretch," they cried, "thy God hath lent thee -- by these angels he hath
Sent thee respite---respite and nepenthe from thy memories of Baltimore
Quaff, O quaff this kind nepenthe, and forget this lost Baltimore!"
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore!"
"Prophet!" said they, "thing of evil!--prophet still, if bird or devil!
Whether tempter sent, or whether tempest tossed thee here ashore,
Desolate, yet all undaunted, on this desert land enchanted--
On this home by horror haunted--tell us truly, we implore:
Is there--is there balm in Cleveland?--tell us--tell us they implore!"
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore."
"Prophet!" said they, "thing of evil--prophet still, if bird or devil!
By that heaven that bends above us--by that God we both adore--
Tell these soul with sorrow laden, if, within the distant Aidenn,
We shall cheer our sainted Browns, whom the owners sent to Baltimore---
Cheer our rare and radiant Browns, whom the owners sent to Baltimore?
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore."
"Be that word our sign of parting, bird or fiend!" they shrieked, upstarting--
"Get thee back into the tempest and the Night's Plutonian shore!
Leave no black plume as a token of that lie thy soul spoken!
Leave our loneliness unbroken! -- quit the bust above our door!
Take thy beak from out our hearts, and take thy form from off our door!"
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore."
And the raven, never flitting, still is sitting, still is sitting
On the pallid bust of Modell just above their bar room door;
And his eyes have all the seeming of a demon's that is dreaming.
And the lamplight o'er him streaming throws his shadow on the floor;
And their souls from out that shadow that lies floating on the floor
Shall be lifted---nevermore!
George
|
61.2127 | No more rivalry | BSS::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Tue Apr 30 1996 01:30 | 20 |
| Belated,
Too Hal and Paul,
As much as it pains me to say this, I really think you fans for the
Brownies got screwed, regardless of you getting a NEW team some year.
I would be very disappointed if Blowland moved the Broncos, so I can
only immagine how you guys felt.
I will for one will miss my Broncos beating the lowly Browns.
On the bright side, when Cleveland gets a new team, maybe they will
have a Qb.
I don't know if you will root for Ravens or just your favorite
players, but to me the Cleveland Browns name and sand stadium should
R.I.P. forever, too never be used again!
Tim
|
61.2129 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue Apr 30 1996 09:27 | 1 |
| That's OK - I hear fellow criminal Christian Peter is available...
|
61.2130 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Apr 30 1996 09:30 | 14 |
| Re <<< Note 61.2127 by BSS::JACKSON "Set the drag just right!" >>>
> I don't know if you will root for Ravens or just your favorite
> players, but to me the Cleveland Browns name and sand stadium should
> R.I.P. forever, too never be used again!
You may get your wish on the Stadium. The latest rumor I heard was that
they were considering tearing the old one down and building the new stadium
on that site.
But you will probably lose on the name. If there is a new team the rumor
is that they will be the Browns.
George
|
61.2131 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue Apr 30 1996 12:44 | 2 |
| I thought the Browns name staying in Cleveland was a done-deal...part of
the NFL's/Modell's settlement with the city of Cleveland.
|
61.2133 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Apr 30 1996 13:04 | 5 |
| Isn't L.A. getting the Seahawks?
Or did that fall through?
George
|
61.2134 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Tue Apr 30 1996 13:09 | 8 |
| Paul Allen, owner of the Trailblazers and co-founder of Microsoft,
has bought an option to buy the team. I think that there are some
stadium issues to be resolved (renovate/build) before he will buy
the team.
I think that they are at least staying put for the 96 season.
Mike
|
61.2136 | could happen??? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Apr 30 1996 18:29 | 3 |
| I heard somewhere (american::football??) that the 9ers could be
a candidate to move to the mistake by the lake...
|
61.2137 | no No NO | BSS::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Tue Apr 30 1996 18:46 | 5 |
| If the 9'rs did move to Cleveland, which I don't think they
would, I would get to read about all the tradition that the team has
and how many Superbowl victories they have;-)
Tim
|
61.2138 | clevesum fortywhiners? | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Tue Apr 30 1996 18:51 | 1 |
|
|
61.2139 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Wed May 01 1996 09:25 | 9 |
|
> I heard somewhere (american::football??) that the 9ers could be
> a candidate to move to the mistake by the lake...
Actually, that would make some sense; DeBartolo's from Youngstown.
As nice as it would be to have a team of the quality of the 49ers
in Cleveland, I hope it doesn't happen...
Joe
|
61.2140 | | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed May 01 1996 13:11 | 5 |
| being a 9er fan I too hope it does not happen. On the other hand
maybe the AFC would finally win a superbowl!!!!
And of course it would hae to be against the cow pies...
|
61.2141 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 01 1996 13:18 | 9 |
| I don't think there is any guarantee that if a new team becomes the Cleveland
Browns that they will be in the AFC. Most likely if the '49ers moved to
Cleveland and changed their name to the Browns they would still be in the
NFC West.
I can't think of a time that a football or baseball team moved and changed
leagues or conferences at the same time.
George
|
61.2142 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 01 1996 14:48 | 4 |
|
If'n the 9ers move to Cleveland to become the Browns, look at all the
championships we can claim (using the George method).
|
61.2143 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 01 1996 15:01 | 8 |
| No, using my method people in San Francisco will be able to claim Cleveland's
championships.
Which leaves me wondering, what do you mean by "we"? Do you still live in
Cleveland? Using your method, if you've left Cleveland you should have no claim
on their championships.
George
|
61.2144 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 01 1996 15:33 | 2 |
|
George, do you live in Boston?
|
61.2145 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 01 1996 15:37 | 4 |
|
Yup.
George
|
61.2146 | what is happening to credibility in SPROTS! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed May 01 1996 15:51 | 5 |
|
George, Boston is spelled "B" "O" "S" "T" "O" "N", *NOT*
"B" "R" "I" "G" "H" "T" "O" "N".
'nuff said...
|
61.2147 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 01 1996 16:02 | 15 |
| Paul now you are the one living in the past.
Brighton was incorporated into the City of Boston around the turn of the
century. When I registered to vote it was at Boston City hall. When my car
caught fire in front of my house the Boston Fire Department came.
When an egg head valdalized our car in front of our house the Boston
Police department responded. The City of Boston picks up our trash, plows
our street and last time I voted in a city election I pulled the switch for
Mayor Tom Menino.
Brighton is just as much a part of Boston as the South End, Dorchester,
Roxbury or Jamaca Plain.
George
|
61.2148 | And now...looks like Belicheck will own the pats... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Wed May 01 1996 16:50 | 8 |
|
Believe it or not, The Browns are still putting out the BNI.
I just got mine the other day. Sad...very sad...
I'll try and post some of the articles when I get some free time.
GRRRRRRRRRRR!
|
61.2149 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Wed May 01 1996 18:57 | 22 |
|
> Brighton is just as much a part of Boston as the South End,
>Dorchester, Roxbury or Jamaca Plain.
Sigh! Nothing against what you said George, but I can't stand stuff
like this crap that occurs in the ole U.S. of A. Boston is 7 square
miles and does not include these new districts. "Boston" does include
those locations.
Same thing with Denver, Los Angeles, Dallas/Fort Worth...I'd bet that
Los Angeles (proper) has less than 1 million people living there.
However, the surrounding towns/cities/districts/whatever decide to JOIN
the city limits and suddenly the city is over 100 square miles.
In my opinion, this is totally sickening and the towns/cities/districts
should not be allowed to keep their name.
As a somewhat small proof as to what I am saying, the Post Office does
NOT recognize that dorchestor/Roxbury... are part of Boston.
Marc
|
61.2150 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 02 1996 08:18 | 2 |
|
Brighton is not Boston, otherwise it would be called Boston.
|
61.2151 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu May 02 1996 09:44 | 23 |
| Brighton became a separate town when it split off from Cambridge at the
beginning of the 19th century and for almost 100 years it was built up as a
separate township. Part of that development was to build streets and roads and
part of building those streets and roads involved giving them names like Park
Street, Tremont Street, Washington Street and other names already used in
Boston.
When the township was revoked and Brighton became part of Boston they didn't
want to change all the street names to make them unique so for practical
reasons the Post Office which is part of the Federal Government calls the area
"Brighton" and that name is used on your address. That way if you live on
Washington Street in Brighton and have an unfortunate address, your mail doesn't
get sent to the Naked I in Boston's Combat Zone.
But from the point of view of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts there is no
Town or City of Brighton. We are residents of Boston, our kids go to Boston
schools, we pay Boston taxes and we vote for Boston city officials.
I live in Boston.
By the way, why are we talking about this? I forget.
George
|
61.2152 | HTH | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu May 02 1996 10:14 | 10 |
|
Bronx = NYC
Queens = NYC
Brooklyn = NYC
Manhatten = NYC
Staten Island = NYC
|
61.2153 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 02 1996 10:29 | 6 |
|
>our kids go to Boston schools
My condolences. I'm moving out of Leominster because of the schools...
and the Leominster school district looks like a world class district
compared to Boston.
|
61.2154 | I have no idea what this means | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu May 02 1996 10:39 | 6 |
|
Bronx = NYC = Cheers
Queens = NYC = would be Kings if'n
Brooklyn = NYC = Bridges
Manhatten = NYC = Jaspers
Staten Island = NYC = Richmond
|
61.2155 | Sprawled into empty space | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Fri May 03 1996 11:59 | 19 |
| .2149, Marc:
> Same thing with Denver, Los Angeles, Dallas/Fort Worth...I'd bet that
> Los Angeles (proper) has less than 1 million people living there.
> However, the surrounding towns/cities/districts/whatever decide to JOIN
> the city limits and suddenly the city is over 100 square miles.
Depends on what you mean by Los Angeles. If you mean the original pueblo,
the population might be 500. But if you mean the current city limits,
which have not changed significantly in years, it's somewhere between three
and four million. The metropolitan area runs anywhere from 12 to 15 M
(I'm out of touch), and includes bordering cities like Inglewood, Glendale,
Pasadena, etc., and enclaves like Beverly Hills and West Hollywood (which is
an unincorporated part of LA County). Many of the individual neighborhoods
within the city bear identifying names (Hollywood being the best known), but
they have not been political entities. LA didn't grow by annexing smaller
cities, it grew into open space. And grew. And grew. And grew.
Steve
|
61.2156 | | NQOS01::nqsrv331.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Fri May 03 1996 13:05 | 4 |
| Groaner and George needed another nit to argue over, and this is a great
place for it. Thanks to all for the help.
brews
|
61.2157 | The "NEW" Browns! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Jun 17 1996 15:20 | 17 |
|
Reports are that the new Cleveland Stadium will be built at the
same location as the old Stadium. Consider it a done deal!
Cleveland's new team.....get ready....consider this one a done deal
too. Tampa orange will soon turn to Cleveland Brown! Suposibly,
Tampa residents won't approve the funds for a new stadium. They
dropped the raise on rental cars and now look for a vote on
increasing some other tax by 1/2 cent in September but everyone
is not giving it much of a chance.
There is a very good chance that Tampa will come to Cleveland
sooner that than expected too. Ohio State University is willing
to let the Browns play there until the new stadium is completed.
WOOF!!!
|
61.2158 | I LIKE THE BUCS! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Jun 17 1996 15:23 | 11 |
|
oh yea....
Tampa has already told the Buc's owner they will not
file court papers if they move the team earlier than the last
contract too.
WOOF! WOOF! WOOF!
|
61.2159 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Mon Jun 17 1996 15:25 | 4 |
|
Sounds like Cleveland gets hosed again. The Browns leave and
now they get the Buc's as a replacement. From bad to pathetic.
|
61.2160 | They will be in Cleveland next year!!! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Jun 17 1996 15:29 | 11 |
|
No way, the 95 Browns stank!!!!
The 95 Bucs are going up!
They have some great prospects, I just don't know their
names yet.....heheheheheheheh!
WOOF!
|
61.2161 | Rumored reports allegedly make deal official...keep the faith | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Jun 17 1996 16:36 | 9 |
|
> Reports are that the new Cleveland Stadium will be built at the
> same location as the old Stadium. Consider it a done deal!
Gotta love Hal's amazing powers of deduction...
glenn
|
61.2162 | HOLDING THINGS UP | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Jun 17 1996 17:08 | 9 |
|
Glenn,
You don't know the half of it....the City Government wanted
to use the site for downtown development not for a new stadium. so
there!
WOOF!
|
61.2163 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Jun 17 1996 17:51 | 4 |
| > You don't know the half of it....the City Government wanted
> to use the site for downtown development not for a new stadium.
Those cretins!
|
61.2164 | | THEMAX::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Mon Jun 17 1996 21:02 | 3 |
| The buckin brown spots still won't get to the superbowl!
Tim
|
61.2165 | 'nuff said | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 18 1996 10:04 | 2 |
|
Have the donks ever won and NFL Championship?
|
61.2166 | Bait | THEMAX::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Tue Jun 18 1996 15:18 | 8 |
| How many times do I have to tell you no? Maybe your node name is
whatcha got for memory cells in that cranium;-)
Now I do have a question for ya Paul. If the buc-in-the-rears do
move to Cleveland, will you become a "fan" of that team no matter their
name?
Tim
|
61.2167 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 18 1996 18:54 | 3 |
|
The team name will be the Browns and yes, I will root for that team.
|
61.2168 | | THEMAX::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Tue Jun 18 1996 21:06 | 1 |
| Will you also root for the Ravens?
|
61.2169 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Jun 18 1996 21:44 | 5 |
|
I'll root for the Ravens until Cleveland gets a team... but I won't
pretend like the Ravens are Cleveland's team, unlike some other people
in here...
|
61.2170 | | CHEFS::7A1_GRN | Go GB/USA/Ken/NZ/Oz Olympic team | Wed Jun 19 1996 06:26 | 5 |
| I don't think anybody else in here *will* pretend that the Ravens are
Cleveland's team.
CHARLEY
|
61.2171 | i know the answer | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Wed Jun 19 1996 12:46 | 5 |
|
So Paul the season after the Buc-in-the-rears move to Cleveland and
become the Browns you will chance your allegiance from the Ravens to
the Browns. Is that bandwagon jumping.:*)
|
61.2172 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jun 19 1996 12:51 | 5 |
|
Jerry, maybe you ought to discuss the bandwagon crap with George. The
Braves moved when he was like 5 years old but he still claims he was a
fan because the older kids in the neighborhood who used to beat the
crap out of him all the time, liked the Braves.
|
61.2173 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Jun 19 1996 14:16 | 5 |
|
Which means we can say, Have the Browns every won an NFL
championship? NOT, Have the Ravens won a championship, YES.
Ron
|
61.2174 | check with a real Brown | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Jun 19 1996 14:17 | 4 |
| What's Jim Brown got to say about all this?
So far, I haven't heard that he's chaning his name to Ahmed Ravens or the
like...
|
61.2175 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Jun 19 1996 14:23 | 10 |
|
> Which means we can say, Have the Browns every won an NFL
> championship? NOT, Have the Ravens won a championship, YES.
Those are George's rules, not Paul's. You're getting the 'wagoning
principles confused again. It's a highly complex process to follow,
but it cain be done...
glenn
|
61.2176 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jun 19 1996 14:26 | 9 |
|
No, the Browns have won NFL championships, but the team now is building
a new history in Baltimore and only clowns or people dying for a
championship would claim any future championships in Baltimore for the
city of Cleveland.
A little clue about why George claims to be a Braves fan - when did the
Red Sox last win the World Series? "nuff said
|
61.2177 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 19 1996 14:45 | 3 |
| I'd hardly call switching allegiance to the 'bucs as hitching onto any
bandwagon. My prediction is that Paul will root for both until one has
emerged successful.
|
61.2178 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Jun 19 1996 14:47 | 6 |
|
Well you don't have a clue then. I already said I root for the Ravens
until another team shows up in Cleveland. Just because you're hard up
for a championship and jump bandwagons left and right, doesn't mean
everyone else does as well.
|
61.2179 | Rules? I don't need no steenk'n rules | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 19 1996 15:19 | 15 |
| Well as you know there is an outside chance that if and when Tampa
moves to Cleveland they may be pretty good so we'll never know.
Personally I root wherever my fancy takes me. For example I rooted
real hard for Seattle in games 4-7; I've loved the way UMass played the
game; I rooted for Pitt mildly in the Superbowl until I observed the
courageous and skilled effort that O'Donnell exhibited.
Rules: I always root for the A.L. vs N.L. and usually AFC vs NFC.
Mostly I like to find an up and coming underdog with some feature
especially when they play the game that way I like them to play.
Personally I don't like the way the RedSox play the game but prefer to
see them win. I do like the way the Yankees play the game. I rooted
fairly strongly for Cleveland to beat Atlanta but I feel they deserved
to lose for not taking my early advice about acquiring a lefthander.
|
61.2180 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed Jun 19 1996 17:22 | 1 |
| who's the idiot that picked the name "Ravens" ?
|
61.2181 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 19 1996 17:34 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2176 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI >>>
> A little clue about why George claims to be a Braves fan - when did the
> Red Sox last win the World Series? "nuff said
According to your rules, when I became a Braves fan back in '91 they had
never won a Championship.
Nuf Ced,
George
|
61.2182 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 19 1996 17:43 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2180 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
>who's the idiot that picked the name "Ravens" ?
Most likely it was picked because Edgar Alan Poe, who wrote "The Raven",
lived in Baltimore.
George
|
61.2183 | keep on tweekin' | THEMAX::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Wed Jun 19 1996 18:55 | 4 |
| Ok, so Paul, are you going to also root on the buc-in-the-rears as
well as hope they continue their life long building program?
Tim
|
61.2184 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu Jun 20 1996 10:19 | 4 |
| > Most likely it was picked because Edgar Alan Poe, who wrote "The Raven",
>lived in Baltimore.
Thanks. I knew there had to be a football connection somewhere...
|
61.2185 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 10:41 | 8 |
| Well, lots of teams have names that have nothing to do with the sport.
To think of a few: Patriots, Jets, Colts, Bills, Dolphins ...
Come to think of it, how many NFL team names really have anything to do with
football?
George
|
61.2186 | several | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 10:57 | 7 |
| How bout the Indianapolis Colts? They was named after the Baltimore Colts
who were a football team.
Same goes for the Rams, named after a couple of football teams, and the
Cardinals, ditto.
TTom
|
61.2187 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:02 | 5 |
| Yeah, there are some very weak names out there, but most were inherited.
You'd think that a new team would come up with a better name than "Ravens".
To me, it's a marketing handicap for a football team.
For an ice skating team it would work...
|
61.2188 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:11 | 13 |
| Re <<< Note 61.2186 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>
>How bout the Indianapolis Colts? They was named after the Baltimore Colts
>who were a football team.
Right, but where did Baltimore get the name Colts? Sure some of the names
can be traced back to the name the team had before they moved but when they
took the name in their original town it had nothing to do with football.
Even Ram is wrong because if a football player did what a ram does they'd
throw a flag for spearing.
George
|
61.2189 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:14 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2187 by POWDML::GARBARINO >>>
>Yeah, there are some very weak names out there, but most were inherited.
>You'd think that a new team would come up with a better name than "Ravens".
>To me, it's a marketing handicap for a football team.
>For an ice skating team it would work...
Have you ever seen a real Raven? In fact they are one bad ass bird.
If you are ever in London go check out the Tower and you'll see what I mean.
Those things are huge and the guards that run the tours are very careful to
tell you to keep your hands away from the birds unless you want to see one
of your fingers get flown off to the nearest tree.
I remember watching one tear a drum stick apart and it wasn't pretty.
George
|
61.2190 | As long as it ends in an S | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:18 | 8 |
| I think today we're going to go where sprots has never gone before;
opening the door named ridiculous, into the realm of absurd followed by
a flight of pure zaniness.
Btw, isn't the New Haven minor league baseball team also the Ravens.
Did Poe sleep there one night?
|
61.2191 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:18 | 4 |
| > Right, but where did Baltimore get the name Colts?
Isn't Maryland a hotbed of horse racing? The Preakness is there,
Bowie racetrack, etc.
|
61.2192 | a real connection | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:25 | 11 |
| >Isn't Maryland a hotbed of horse racing? The Preakness is there,
>Bowie racetrack, etc.
And the football players bet on the horses...
Actually the Edgar Allen Poe connection is the football players share his
passion for doing drugs. A little belladonna afore the game and you're
good to go. Some myristica frangrens at time out. Then back to the
dressing room to fix up at half time.
TTom
|
61.2193 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:28 | 26 |
| > I think today we're going to go where sprots has never gone before;
> opening the door named ridiculous, into the realm of absurd followed by
> a flight of pure zaniness.
Uh, earth to Bill, earth to Bill.... Sports goes there EVERY day.
> Btw, isn't the New Haven minor league baseball team also the Ravens.
> Did Poe sleep there one night?
No. I believe it rhymed with New Haven and that's why they picked it.
No other logical reason comes to mind.
I'm not a big fan of "Rock Cats" either -- anyone who knows anything about
music knows that the term "Cat" is about three generations old and isn't used
all that much today except by older jazz musicians...
Hardward City makes sense though...
'Saw
|
61.2194 | weak name, WEAKER Uni... | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:37 | 11 |
| > Have you ever seen a real Raven? In fact they are one bad ass bird.
> If you are ever in London go check out the Tower and you'll see what I mean.
>Those things are huge and the guards that run the tours are very careful to
>tell you to keep your hands away from the birds unless you want to see one
>of your fingers get flown off to the nearest tree.
That's a well and good, but sports marketing isn't based on "read attached
nickname justification"...especially when you're trying to appeal to
the youth market with a $20 hat. Did you see their uniform ?
|
61.2195 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:57 | 12 |
| All you have to do is read the poem and that should give you the flavor
for what Ravens are all about.
In any event, last week I was talking to one of Patty's clients, a guy
who lives about 15 miles south of Baltimore. He was saying that people down
there are really getting excited about the Ravens.
He said that even though the CFL team won a couple championships they never
really caught on and most likely will leave if they don't see the level of
fan support that they would like.
George
|
61.2196 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Jun 20 1996 14:02 | 1 |
61.2197 | | NQOS01::nqsrv340.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Thu Jun 20 1996 14:50 | 6 |
| > Even Ram is wrong because if a football player did what a ram does they'd
>throw a flag for spearing.
Rams don't leave their feet when they butt, so I think it's legal, George.
brews
|
61.2198 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 14:54 | 8 |
| <<< Note 61.2197 by NQOS01::nqsrv340.nqo.dec.com::may_br "BRUCE MAY" >>>
>Rams don't leave their feet when they butt, so I think it's legal, George.
Don't they have their front feet sort of curled up under their chest and
their head down when they smash into their target?
George
|
61.2199 | legal | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:04 | 2 |
| Yeah, but that's a legal move if'n the other ram is not already engaged
with another ram.
|
61.2200 | This is the Cleveland Browns note! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:05 | 7 |
|
PLEASE TAKE THE RAVENS TO THEIR OWN NOTE PLEASE....THEY ARE NOT AND
WILL NEVER BE A CLEVELAND TEAM AGAIN!!!!!!!
GRRRRRRRR!
|
61.2201 | now what? | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:07 | 4 |
| > -< This is the Cleveland Browns note! >-
... and there's no Cleveland Brown team, either.
|
61.2202 | It's legal even if the Ram is married, right George? | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:07 | 1 |
|
|
61.2203 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:07 | 10 |
| > -< It's legal even if the Ram is married, right George? >-
Is this that beastiality thing again?
Gee, just when I thought I had it ALL figured out!!!
|
61.2204 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:08 | 3 |
|
Mod Write Lock it!!!! No Team no Note!!!! :+)
|
61.2205 | | NQOS01::nqsrv340.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:27 | 6 |
|
C'mon Chappy, you dick, if it pisses Hal off, we need to keep it open.
And George, The ram's back feet stay on the ground.
brews
|
61.2206 | feet don't fail me now | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:30 | 6 |
| There is no requirement that you stay on your feet when you hit somebody
in football, assuming that it would be otherwise legal. Obviously if'n
it's a clip or a_illegal block in the back or the like, it don't matter
what you do with your feet.
But you can fly through the air with the greatest of ease and ram 'im.
|
61.2207 | 2 on 2 off | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:30 | 1 |
|
|
61.2208 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:33 | 6 |
|
No rules for 4 footed football players. No rules for hooves or horns either.
Now what?
George
|
61.2209 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:35 | 4 |
|
Spearing is illegal and will get you a fat fine if performed in view
of the ref or the camera. You do not have to leave your feet to
Spear someone, but it sure helps.
|
61.2210 | yep | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:38 | 3 |
| Yeah, spearing, like clipping, is illegal.
TTom
|
61.2211 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:44 | 3 |
| So is what a Ram does spearing or not spearing?
George
|
61.2212 | minor transgression | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:48 | 5 |
| Depends on if'n the other ram is on the ground and or the firsted ram has
a helmet on and uses it to initiate the contact.
Usually when a couple of rams both ram each other's haid with they own
haid, the refs let it go...
|
61.2213 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jun 20 1996 15:55 | 9 |
| > -< 2 on 2 off >-
Is that anything like wax on, wax off?
(say it three times fast...heh heh heh)
|
61.2214 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 16:08 | 13 |
| Re <<< Note 61.2212 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>
>Depends on if'n the other ram is on the ground and or the firsted ram has
>a helmet on and uses it to initiate the contact.
Well I guess the ram's horns act has a built in helmet. Maybe if he dove
into another ram from the side or behind he'd draw a flag but as you say
head to head they'd let it go.
Then again if the refs did throw a flag the Ram would probably eat it so
that would have to be figured in somehow.
George
|
61.2215 | a ram of a diff'rent color | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 16:15 | 7 |
| and speaking of rams...
Someone kidnapped Ramses the something, the mascot of No Carolina Tar
Heels and kilt 'im, carved 'im up and tried to eat the rascal.
They found the remnant where evidently the perpetrators had too much beer
to drink and couldn't eat all of 'em...
|
61.2216 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Jun 20 1996 16:42 | 1 |
61.2217 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Jun 20 1996 16:48 | 4 |
|
Tom Haas was NOTY!!!
|
61.2218 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 20 1996 16:50 | 3 |
|
Nice try Chappy, I know I had at least twice as many votes as he did.
|
61.2219 | HTH's | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Thu Jun 20 1996 16:52 | 7 |
|
I just count legal votes. Yours was counted but all your butties were
deleted.
Chap
|
61.2220 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 20 1996 17:39 | 4 |
|
Sorry Chappy, just because you didn't like the outcome you changed the
rules. Karen won by stuffing the ballot box, and nowhere in the rules
did it state it was not legal.
|
61.2221 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Thu Jun 20 1996 18:23 | 14 |
|
re: nowhere in the rules
However, if this were to be taken to a court of law, the result could
go either way. For example, take our SPDs (Software Product
Description). If you do something with a given product that the SPD
does not say you can't do, it is unsupported. This is because the SPD
is a legally binding document stating ONLY what IS supported.
Therefore, someone might conclude that since the rules did not say you
could "stuff" the ballot box, then it is not allowed.
Marc
|
61.2222 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Jun 20 1996 20:44 | 4 |
|
Who said I stuffed the ballot box? I asked people to vote for me -
its called campaigning and its legal in every election in the USA that
I know of.
|
61.2224 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Jun 21 1996 08:32 | 6 |
|
Simple suggestion that I'm sure both Hal and Groner can appreciate, change
the name of this note to Cleveland Browns/Baltimore Ravens. After all they
are the same team. They're still Art Modells and 64 coaches for 45 players...
mike
|
61.2225 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 08:58 | 2 |
|
I don't think NOTY will ever recover from ChappyGate 96.
|
61.2226 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 21 1996 09:31 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 61.2224 by PECAD8::CHILDS >>>
>Simple suggestion that I'm sure both Hal and Groner can appreciate, change
>the name of this note to Cleveland Browns/Baltimore Ravens. After all they
>are the same team. They're still Art Modells and 64 coaches for 45 players...
Sounds good to me but watch out. There's been not only disagreement but
actual hard feelings (unbelievable as that may sound) over the Braves note
including the names Boston and Milwaukee.
George
|
61.2227 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri Jun 21 1996 09:35 | 4 |
|
This is the Cleveland Browns note, this note has nothing to do with the
Baltimore Ravens. Anyone who wants to believe it does just doesn't
have a clue.
|
61.2228 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jun 21 1996 09:46 | 4 |
|
See, don't say I didn't told you so.
George
|
61.2229 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Jun 21 1996 09:59 | 2 |
|
And there is already a note for the Baltimore Modells anyway...
|
61.2230 | once a team always a team | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 21 1996 10:18 | 7 |
| Hey George,
Did ya notice that when Smoltz won his 14th in a row he beat a team
record held by a guy who played for Boston? Aught-two or something like
that.
TTom
|
61.2231 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Fri Jun 21 1996 11:48 | 4 |
| > This is the Cleveland Browns note, this note has nothing to do with the
> Baltimore Ravens.
or the Cleveland-Los Angeles-St. Louis Rams either....right Groaner ???
|
61.2232 | Just trying to abide by the law.... | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:33 | 8 |
|
Karen I would have Tabulated and posted them but Frank said not too.
No more contests remember???
Chap
|
61.2233 | wholesome, with family values | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:40 | 8 |
| Hail, we can run it over on HBAHBA somewhere.
But we gotta have some rules. Like, all votes have to be posted, you can
bribe anyone, you can do anything, nothing matters.
Important things like that.
TTom
|
61.2234 | Bernie is back..... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Thu Jun 27 1996 17:07 | 9 |
|
Latest word from home is that Bernie Kosar is very VERY interested
in owning the new "CLEVELAND BROWNS". He expects that it will cost
him 3 Mill..
I say.....GO FOR IT!!!
WOOF!
|
61.2235 | helluva deal | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 27 1996 17:10 | 6 |
| Yo WOOF
I know that Cleveland is down on its luck and all but 3 Mill for a whole
football team?
Hail, the Richardsons had to pay 150 Mill or so for the Painters
|
61.2236 | get what you pay for | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Jun 27 1996 17:37 | 1 |
61.2237 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Jun 28 1996 09:22 | 4 |
|
Well, maybe I read it wrong...I look at it again this weekend.
WOOF!
|
61.2238 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Fri Sep 13 1996 12:18 | 4 |
61.2239 | Muck Fodell | ALFSS2::TAYLOR_D | run those fat tackles to death | Mon Sep 30 1996 16:58 | 14 |
61.2240 | So where was the surprise? | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Mon Sep 30 1996 17:02 | 25 |
61.2241 | He said he would sell the team.... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Mon Sep 30 1996 17:21 | 9 |
61.2242 | Browns went down the crapper | BSS::RIGGEN | | Mon Sep 30 1996 17:29 | 5 |
61.2243 | | NQOS01::nqsrv211.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Mon Sep 30 1996 20:11 | 5 |
61.2244 | no surprise, dope as usual | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Sep 30 1996 23:39 | 5 |
61.2245 | Whatever opposing wagon we can find! | STRATA::BTOWER | | Tue Oct 01 1996 08:19 | 2 |
61.2246 | Yankmees will choke again | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 01 1996 08:56 | 3 |
61.2247 | Its Actually Seeming Funny (sometimes) | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Oct 01 1996 09:33 | 8 |
61.2248 | What took you so long | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Oct 01 1996 11:13 | 15 |
61.2249 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Oct 01 1996 11:35 | 6 |
61.2250 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue Oct 01 1996 13:13 | 10 |
61.2251 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:20 | 15 |
61.2252 | 1 9 9 9 C L E V E L A N D B R O W N S | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:02 | 14 |
|
News from the Cleveland front......
The City of Cleveland has guarenteed them a team in 1999!!!
The City had to sell a certain percentage of preseason seats
by the end of January. They did it by mid January. The NFL
will now have to give Cleveland up to 48 mills to help build
the stadium which has been demolished. There are still some
lodge and club seats available...not many...but a few are left.
WOOF!
|
61.2253 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:06 | 3 |
| So where is the NFL going to come up with this team? Expansion?
George
|
61.2254 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:08 | 2 |
|
I hope so, but suspect not...
|
61.2255 | THE BROWNS STILL LIVE... | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:13 | 23 |
|
News from Cleveland is that they will get an expansion team but
be prepared....they more than likely won't get the same deal the
two previous expansion teams got when they came into the league.
In the Browns News there is this poster for sale...
On the top it says...
YOUR MINE
There is this Cleveland Brown guy
choking this bird around the neck
in the middle... and on the bottom
IN 99.
WOOF!
|
61.2256 | After you on this one, Groaner | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:15 | 5 |
| Groaner do you want to tell them where it might be coming from?
I got Cleveland folk mad at me for pointing out the Browns basenote but
what was said there by Modell is very similar to things said by Bob
Kraft about a stadium in Boston.
|
61.2257 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:28 | 4 |
|
Most likely move would be Seattle, followed by Cincinnati, followed by
a team that refuses to update their high school football stadium <---
aluminum benches (GET REAL!)
|
61.2258 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Feb 18 1997 11:47 | 4 |
| The Cleveland Cardinals has a nice ring to it.
I still don't see Cleveland getting a team before L.A. The L.A.
Cardinals sounds pretty good too.
|
61.2259 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Tue Feb 18 1997 12:33 | 10 |
| I read a report that Cincy was in the final stages of selecting
a site for a new stadium, so it looks like they're out of the
running.
Seahawks, Cards, and Pats would be my order for an existing team.
I think the NFL is trying to avoid having an existing team move
into LA on its own, so expanding by two teams (LA/CLE) would make
some sense, though not from a product quality standpoint.
Mike
|
61.2260 | | SALEM::DODA | Someday, someway.... | Tue Feb 18 1997 12:49 | 6 |
| <<< Note 61.2259 by MYLIFE::mccarthy "Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468" >>>
>so expanding by two teams (LA/CLE) would make
>some sense, though not from a product quality standpoint.
That's ok. They're used to it.
|
61.2261 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Tue Feb 18 1997 13:03 | 6 |
| >>so expanding by two teams (LA/CLE) would make
>>some sense, though not from a product quality standpoint.
>That's ok. They're used to it.
I get an assist, right?
|
61.2262 | | SALEM::DODA | Someday, someway.... | Tue Feb 18 1997 14:35 | 1 |
| Yes you do.
|
61.2263 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Feb 18 1997 14:43 | 5 |
| So what's this deal about how the Browns would get a team in '99 if they sold
a certain a certain number of tickets? Exactly who is guaranteeing what to
whom?
George
|
61.2264 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Feb 18 1997 15:19 | 4 |
|
The NFL guarenteed the city of Cleveland a team.
Joe
|
61.2265 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Feb 18 1997 15:34 | 9 |
|
Since they can't force a team to stay or move that would mean they must
definitely be planing an expansion, right?
I had heard rumors but I never heard an announcement that the NFL was ready
to expand again. Has that been decided or does Cleveland only get a team IF
they expand.
George
|
61.2266 | don't matter | HBAHBA::HAAS | netwrok spatialist | Tue Feb 18 1997 15:37 | 7 |
| With all the comings and goings in pro sports, you don't really need
a_expansion to find a team willing to move, even to Cleveland.
Beside, the NFL has nothing to lose. What can Cleveland do? Sue 'em?
Stand in line and good luck.
TTom
|
61.2267 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The *PACK* is back | Tue Feb 18 1997 15:54 | 2 |
|
move the Rams to Cleveland and call them... the Cleveland Rams
|
61.2268 | They Really Are! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Feb 18 1997 16:47 | 1 |
| Groaner, I LOVE your set personal!
|
61.2269 | | NQOS01::nqsrv141.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Inside Intel | Thu Feb 20 1997 16:13 | 5 |
|
Damn, with the ultimate demise of the Indians, I'd figured the days of
Halbonics were over.
brews
|