T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
9.1 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 11 1993 14:54 | 2 |
| Well, how about that AFC (L)East! The AFC finals will feature two
teams from that maligned division.
|
9.2 | all my favorites are out | CNTROL::CHILDS | Liz Smith wants Madonna's body | Mon Jan 11 1993 15:01 | 5 |
| hopefully Buffalo survives. The thought of watching crybaby Dan and Shula
in the big one is very disturbing to me. Almost as disturbing as watching
Dallas make it.....
mike
|
9.3 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Mon Jan 11 1993 15:24 | 17 |
| Dallas and SF for the NFC title !!!! One could not have asked for a
better matchup.
I honestly feel that the 'Boys are a year away from the Super Bowl, but
they have progressed quite nicely these past few years. One wonders
how the new NFL Agreement will affect this team, and whether we will be
able to get Reggie White to come play DL for us next year.
All in all an excellent year for the 'Boys. My prediction for the
games this weekend:
Buffalo @Miami: 24-20
Dallas @SF: 10-34
Next year the SB will belong to Dallas, as this is SF last hurrah.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.4 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Another NEW Boston Garden gone | Mon Jan 11 1993 15:40 | 7 |
| Hey BigMac, the whole AFC stinks! MikeC, I personally would
love to see the Dolphins stomp the Bills next week and have that
Miami drug money push the Super Bowl line to some small number,
'cuz the NFC will dominate again. Plus after watching the 'Phins
yesterday a comeuppance for them would be fun to watch.
/Don
|
9.5 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | RAY What now? I'm Going to Disneyworld! | Mon Jan 11 1993 15:50 | 13 |
| Well of the remaining teams, each has a chance of making Super Bowl
History.
San Fran, of course, can be the firsted to 5 Super Bowls.
Dallas can become the third team to LOSE 4 Super Bowls.
Miami can also become the third team to Lose 4 Super Bowls. Don the Genius
Shula has a chance for his 5th Super Bowl loss.
Buffalo can lose its 3rd straight Super Bowl.
JD
|
9.6 | Somebody, anybody, please beat Luckalo... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jan 11 1993 16:20 | 9 |
| Well, out of the teams that were in the playoffs, the 2 I least wanted
to win it are still in, and the the 2 I most wanted to see win it are
still in.
Sure was a satisfying win for Miami yesterday, after what seems like
the whole country picked the Chargers.
Joe
|
9.8 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Why George why? Because it's there! | Mon Jan 11 1993 16:54 | 33 |
|
Well I have to get this off my chest as I'm still a little peeved.
I watched some of the Bills-Steelers game beginning with the fluff
piece OJ Simpson did on the O'Donnell family. I'm not a big fan of
OJ's reporting style, but thought he was doing a decent job painting
the picture of Neil O'Donnell and his dedicating the season to his
ill father.
Well OJ is ending the piece talking about the time he spent with
the two O'Donnell brothers who reside in New York when he IGNORANTLY
states, and I paraphrase " I spent the evening with Tom and Peter
O'Donnell, and they must have thought I was Irish because I still
have a big headache to prove it." What an ignorant ~/~!
Here's a man who's been in the public limelight for years, and
as a African-American has probably seen more racism and stereotyping
than I could ever imagine, and he's unbelievably making a statement
reinforcing another negative stereotype!!! I was absolutely livid
and apoplectic! Hell, I probably overreacted as OJ definitely meant
no harm, but dammit, HE should know and be sensitive about these
things.
Well I'm about to pen a letter to OJ and NBC protesting this type
of statement. Dammit, OJ, THINK before you say something like that
on national TV! Damn, I can equate what he said to some of Al
Campanis' ignorant statements. Hell, I'm no PC person, but in
his position of influence, OJ oughta be more careful in the words
he chooses.
Flame off,
MikeL
|
9.9 | | MKFSA::LONG | "just keep it between the lines" | Mon Jan 11 1993 17:17 | 7 |
| Mike, I heard the same thing and had the same reaction you did.
I turned to my wife and asked her if he will get the same treatment
Jimmy "the Greek" got.
I think not, although he deserves it.
Bill
|
9.10 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Be a team player... | Mon Jan 11 1993 17:52 | 2 |
| Didn't see it, but I can sympathize with you...
|
9.11 | hypothetical | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Jan 12 1993 00:29 | 5 |
| So how would theyhave scheduled the games on Sunday if SD had won? 2
games on the West Coast, anyone know??
The Crazy Met
|
9.12 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | RAY What now? I'm Going to Disneyworld! | Tue Jan 12 1993 08:46 | 17 |
| TCM:
One game would have been a morning (PST) start.
REgarding Sunday:
It sure was nice seeing the "Ultimate QB Weapon" do his bounce pass
routine. Crandall Runningham, the most overrated QB in the league, and
approaching all-time overrated status. He still can't read zone
defenses, and he's still enamoured with his own physical skills. Then
again, I guess most folks would bounce passes trying to throw while
choking.
Oh, and before the season, I told Bob Hunt that Herschal would fumble
ina big game. Nice cough up, Hershal.
JD
|
9.13 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 12 1993 11:09 | 3 |
| � Hey BigMac, the whole AFC stinks!
The Bills were undefeated against the NFC in the regular season.
|
9.14 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 12 1993 12:18 | 29 |
| First Gastineau, now this. Will the Sack Exchange become the Chain
Gang?
From: [email protected] (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc,clari.sports.top
Subject: Former football pro pleads in fraud case
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 93 15:20:40 PST
PHILADELPHIA (UPI) -- Former New York Jets All-Pro defensive lineman
Joe Klecko pleaded guilty Monday to lying to a grand jury investigating
auto insurance fraud.
Klecko, of Malvern, faces sentencing April 8. The plea came shortly
before his trial in a federal courtroom was to begin.
Klecko was caught up in a scheme which led to the arrest of 67 people
for allegedly trying to defraud Sun Oil. The scheme involved cars
allegedly damaged by emissions from Sun's Marcus Hook refinery.
Klecko was apparently one of a number of auto and truck owners
recruited to lend their registrations so that false claims could be
submitted. When called to testify before a grand jury, Klecko lied about
the condition of his truck.
Klecko's lawyer John Wing said the former football player knew
nothing of the scheme and was trying to protect friends. Wing said
Klecko appeared before the grand jury without a lawyer and was unaware
investigators knew his story was false.
Klecko, who played collegiately at Temple, was a member of the Jets
from 1977-87. He was voted to the Pro Bowl after the 1981, 1983, 1984
and 1985 seasons and was a member of the defensive line known as the
``New York Sack Exchange.''
|
9.15 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Tue Jan 12 1993 14:47 | 13 |
|
re Irish drinking:
As some of you know, I've been working quite a bit with Irish people,
as my customer is building a new factory in Ireland. I've met 40-50
Irish people, either DEC employees or customers, and their family in
the last 18 months. To a person, they all backed up the reputation
(and some of it I witnessed) of the Irish as drinkers, and didn't seem
upset about it. What DID bother them is when Americans of Irish
descent pass themselves off as being Irish. They can't understand that
at all.
Brews
|
9.16 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Tue Jan 12 1993 15:43 | 19 |
| What's your point Brews?
That I shouldn't be offended by OJ's ignorant statement?
I'm an American who happens to have some Irish ancestors.
The negative stereotype perpetrated by Simpson referred to "Irish"
as heavy drinkers. That insulted *me* as an American with some
Irish background. I do not speak for anyone else, whether they be
Irish or not. The fact is that his statement offended me by
furthering a perceived stereotype. Just because your Irish
cohorts laugh it off doesn't mean I or anyone else with an Irish
background feels the same way.
And you can tell your Irish friends that this person regards himself
as an American with Irish ancestors, not an Irishman, if that makes
them feel any better.
MikeL
|
9.17 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Tue Jan 12 1993 16:24 | 6 |
|
My point is that you ain't Irish, and people whine about the littlest
things. There are few Irish people who would have a problem with what
he said (maybe Sinead, but the Irish are embarassed about her anyway).
Brews
|
9.18 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | A2 brings out the hypocrites | Tue Jan 12 1993 17:20 | 5 |
| I have Irish background in me, and some native american indian, and
It didn't offend me. Course I like to drink when the occasion is
right.
Tim
|
9.19 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Tue Jan 12 1993 17:59 | 10 |
| Hey, if the Americans who happen to be of Irish decent don't want to be
associated with drinking, then why all the St. Patty's day hoopla?
Youze guys are too sensative...they've been stereotyping us
Italian-Americans as good looking, stylish, and intelligent for years
and it hasn't bothered me one bit.
Get a life, will ya?
JoJ_NOT
|
9.20 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Isn't That Right, Al | Tue Jan 12 1993 18:22 | 4 |
|
I know... I'm 50% IA and I get that stuff all the time, JoJ_Not !
BG
|
9.21 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | A2 brings out the hypocrites | Tue Jan 12 1993 20:09 | 9 |
| reply .19 sounds sooooo much like the Jo*, don't ya agree?
The AFC will rool again. Give it 2-3 years;^)
Does anyone have the stats as to the afc vs nfc this year?
Tim
|
9.22 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Wed Jan 13 1993 09:38 | 11 |
|
Yabbut
Being 50% tall, I find myself offended, half the time, with jokes
about the weather!
I remain,
"wardling" on the other half!
;^)
Kev
|
9.23 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Jan 13 1993 10:00 | 20 |
| I'll put this to rest now.
*I* was offended and it pissed me off. I'm not Irish and do you
think OJ was referring to natives of Ireland only? I ain't asking for
his job, an apology, nuttin, bros. What pissed me off is that he
made this ignorant statement in a national medium. He should know
better and shut his big mouf! So y'all can go pound sand in telling me
how I should react. I gots a pretty thick skin, mo buichailles ( dat's
Irish ISFH), and I've heard much worse than that. And as far as gittin'
a life, I gots one danke, and shall continue to have one and don't need
advice.
Case closed, let's get back to football.
SF over Dallas by 6
Buffalo over Miami by 3.
And my name ain't Jimbo. 8^)
MikeL
|
9.24 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 13 1993 10:00 | 13 |
|
OJ's a dork. His line may or may not have offended most Irish
Americans but the fact that he apparently didn't even think twice about
it just fits the general pattern he's demonstrated over the years as
one of the worst broadcasters/reporters to ever settle in behind a
microphone. I mean, the guy has been *horrible* for years, but his
name keeps him in a job. Kinda like Joe Namath.
However, MikeL, I think you might have a better case against Notre
Dame... ;-)
glenn
|
9.25 | 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Jan 13 1993 10:50 | 18 |
| Ah but glenn mon ami,
The ND "Fighting Irish" is not purported to represent the popular
notion of the "Irish" as internecine warriors. It was intended to
represent the valor and courage of the "Irish-American" brigades
of both the Union and Confederacy during the Civil War or War Between
the States; thus no negative stereotyping yet a positive depiction.
Mainfully the words "although the odds be great or small..." carries
through this storied depiction into Four Horseman legend and deed.
But I wax poetic in the wrong note... There I feel much better.
Danke, mein freund, for the gentle prod.
Ahhhhh,
MikeL
|
9.26 | Total fiction? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 13 1993 11:50 | 17 |
|
> The ND "Fighting Irish" is not purported to represent the popular
> notion of the "Irish" as internecine warriors. It was intended to
> represent the valor and courage of the "Irish-American" brigades
> of both the Union and Confederacy during the Civil War or War Between
> the States; thus no negative stereotyping yet a positive depiction.
This is getting off the beaten track, but is this actual origin of the
nickname? I had heard some hackeneyed tale of how the Indiana
homesteaders oft made jest of the (French) Notre Dame fathers and
followers, picking fights with them in town and usually getting the
desired results. These ignorant Indianans thought that the French
were Irish, and such was born the nickname. At least this is how I
heard the story from some ND alum somewhere down the line...
glenn
|
9.27 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Wed Jan 13 1993 12:18 | 13 |
|
-1,
Didn't hear that one glenn. But I do know that ND was known as the
"Ramblers" until the early 20's ( Rockne era).
I heard and seen the story I narrated.
The one thing that *is* true is that the slogan has nothing to do with
the battles in and amongst Eire.
Oh well,
Back to pro football??
MikeL
|
9.28 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Wed Jan 13 1993 14:57 | 16 |
|
Bruce -
Um, are you of Irish descent? I have mucho relatives in Ireland.
There is a movement to stop the portrayal of the 'paddy'.
In the states, theres a movement to stop it also. Its stereotyping
Bruce - just like using the Uncle Tom figure, for instance, for
African AMericans, or a mafia hit man for all Italians, or
soccer players for folks like you.
Given that drunken portrayals of the Irish started with the British
as a form of comedy for the landed gentry (actors were British, of
course), the stereotype is just that.
JD
|
9.29 | (8^)* | PFSVAX::JACOB | Squeelers = Loser Girly Mons | Wed Jan 13 1993 16:07 | 10 |
|
>>Didn't hear that one glenn. But I do know that ND was known as the
>>"Ramblers" until the early 20's ( Rockne era).
^^^^^^^^
What'd they have to do with AMC Motors???? Were they as horrible back
then as Ramblers were????
JaKe
|
9.30 | | HEFTY::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Wed Jan 13 1993 16:55 | 28 |
|
The problem with this whole O.J. thing is that if the shoe were
on the other foot, we'd be seeing Jesse, Rev. Al, and the ACLU asking
for a retraction along with a resignation.
Seems to me that I recall Howard Cosell on a national TV broadcast
calling a Redskin widereciver a 'little monkey' (not in a derrogatory
way) and it was blown completely out of proportion. Marg Schott makes
some comments and again, she is completely raked through the media.
Now, OJ makes a derrogatory comment which just so happens to
involve a ethnic white group. Ahh, but this was 'funny'...no harm,
no foul. It was all in jest! So they all say. And then some even
say, "well, isn't it true?"
This plainly stinks of bias in the media. Again, Jesse can call
NY 'hymietown' and it is brushed off. OJ can call the Irish a bunch
of drunkards and it is laughed off. But, let anyone say that blacks
are lazy and not as smart as white folks, and they are labeled with
the KKK.
I for one do not brush this off so easily. I'm not Irish, but
I do see a double standard here and those that feel offended have
a right to say so. And OJ should be brought to task on the comment!
bill..g.
|
9.31 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Wed Jan 13 1993 18:38 | 11 |
|
I don't know what my heritage has to do with this, but I do have some
Irish blood in me, along with just about everything else. OJ's remarks
didn't bother me, because I'm not whiney and didn't let it. Remarks
about Scots, Germans, the English or American Indians don't bother me
either. Try being thick-skinned and having a sense of humor, it makes
life more pleasant.
Still haven't seen any Irish upset about the comments.
Brews
|
9.32 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 14 1993 08:53 | 20 |
| > either. Try being thick-skinned and having a sense of humor, it makes
> life more pleasant.
>
> Still haven't seen any Irish upset about the comments.
Hmmm.
In reading this note all at once (haven't been in the file in a couple
of days) I got the impression that the issue wasn't so much the comment,
as it was the insensitive and careless way it was made.
Not wanting to start a rathole, but billG had a point. No one gets upset
when OJ makes a stereotypical comment about a group of white people,
but if it were the other way around.....
Oh well.....
'Saw
|
9.33 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Thu Jan 14 1993 09:40 | 12 |
| Bruce -
I too don't get all upset about it. But to me, it seemed that you
dismissed folks being angry cuz you've had drinks with some
Irishmen. That's all.
JD
PS: Jim Kelly, an obvious drunken Irish-American, will start vs. the
Dolphins this weekend.
Signing off to get sloshed and eat some potato.
|
9.34 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Thu Jan 14 1993 09:42 | 15 |
| Bruce you just don't get it.
You state that you haven't heard any "Irish" upset about it.
As JD pointed out, this stereotype began about the Irish in Ireland
and continued to include any American ( or Canadian, Australian, etc)
of Irish background. Can't you see that?
The fact remains that OJ furthered a negative stereotype by his
ignorant statement and I was offended. Period.
And 'Saw, my beef is with the comment AND the careless and ignorant
way that OJ presented it. But I ain't calling for his haid, just that
he think before he says something like that.
Latah,
MikeL
|
9.35 | These examples are worlds apart... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 14 1993 10:15 | 24 |
|
> Seems to me that I recall Howard Cosell on a national TV broadcast
> calling a Redskin widereciver a 'little monkey' (not in a derrogatory
> way) and it was blown completely out of proportion. Marg Schott makes
> some comments and again, she is completely raked through the media.
I wouldn't equate the comments that Marge Schott made with any of these
other examples. Her statements were clearly hateful and her front
office hiring record suggests that she did more than just say things,
but actually acted on them. You make statements like "I'd rather have
a trained monkey working for me than a n&^$%$" and the record backs it
up, you should be held accountable. I don't think she's received
excessively negative media attention.
OJ was perhaps insensitive but it's fairly obvious that his comments
were *not* derogatory (yes, same as Cosell). In the context that he
used he did not come close to calling the Irish "a bunch of drunkards".
After all, in the story *he* was the one slugging back the drinks to
the point where his head hurt the next day. OJ tried to inject some
self-deprecation into a little joke but used bad judgment.
glenn
|
9.37 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 14 1993 10:30 | 10 |
| > And 'Saw, my beef is with the comment AND the careless and ignorant
> way that OJ presented it. But I ain't calling for his haid, just that
> he think before he says something like that.
Okay. I thought you had downplayed the comment a bit to highlight the
ignorance of OJ making it. I get it now.
'Saw
|
9.38 | fyi | FRETZ::HEISER | arms raised in a V | Thu Jan 14 1993 10:42 | 11 |
| Hate to disrupt you sunburned lushes but there was an interesting
report out of Mobile yesterday (site of the NFL Coach's Convention and
Senior Bowl). Many times, owners and potential coaches show up as well
for filling openings and interviewing.
- All NFL teams are represented there except for the 4 playoff teams and
the Phoenix Cardinals.
- Pat Bowlen is there
- Ditka isn't there.
Mike
|
9.39 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Thu Jan 14 1993 11:28 | 14 |
|
The point is that I'm not offended either, but it just shows that
there is an inbalance in how the media reacts. I wasn't taken aback
by any of it, but it is sad when one group or groups create a feeding
frenzy over the same type of comment while the other goes ingnored.
Believe me, if had been Bradshaw making a comment that dealt with
a minority race, folks would be calling for his head. But I guess
since it was OJ, and since no one got, nor should they have gotten
offended by the comment, we'll just let it slide.
bill..g.
|
9.41 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Thu Jan 14 1993 20:07 | 3 |
| More importantly, how many Irish QB's have ever won the Superbowl?
JoJ_the_peacemaker
|
9.42 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Fri Jan 15 1993 11:16 | 8 |
| Why JoJ!
You're favorite Jest!! Namath had to have some Irish in him, no?
Didn't he win the Supe wif a massive hangover? ( or was that the
champeenship game agin Oakland?)
8^),
MikeL
|
9.45 | jury is out - business or pleasure | FRETZ::HEISER | arms raised in a V | Fri Jan 15 1993 13:38 | 2 |
| Hey Brews, we're gonna have to start a Cardinals topic if the clowns
hire Dikka.
|
9.46 | | CSC32::A_PARRACO | Starless and Bible Black | Sat Jan 16 1993 16:34 | 9 |
|
Geez, just 1 week into the new conference, and the topic has been
irrevoccably rat-holed ...
"I jez thank that's SAAAAAD !"
Carry on.
- acp
|
9.47 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Sun Jan 17 1993 19:10 | 14 |
| After watching the NFC championship game, I cannot believe that the
network announcers (Madden & Summerall) wouldn't point out the "flow"
of the game being affected by several well palced (and well thrown)
penalty flags, taking scores and momentum from the 49ers. I am a fan of
neither team (I'm an Eagles fan, for what that's worth) but the two
holding calls were obscene and caused a 14 point swing in the final
score. After the second "holding call" (Holding on an RB on a play
fake... not likely), my wife and I turned it off, knowing that the NFL
wanted the 'boys to win and that it would work out that way. I have
zero interest in the Super Bowl and will watch it minimally. Is the
mass public that big a sheep that they cannot see what's going on?!?!
Dennis Faust
|
9.48 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Sun Jan 17 1993 23:43 | 8 |
| re: .47
Heck of a charge. Guess I'm just one of the sheep who can't see whats
going on. Oh yeah, I loathe the Cowboys and was hoing they would lose.
At least Miami lost.
The Crazy Met
|
9.49 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 18 1993 09:10 | 15 |
|
> I am a fan of
> neither team (I'm an Eagles fan, for what that's worth) but the two
> holding calls were obscene and caused a 14 point swing in the final
> score.
Well, I was rooting for the 49ers (this Super Bowl is going to be hard
to stomach, all the way around, but if I must-- Go Bills!), but the
first holding call was legit, on a pass rusher coming right up the
middle to prevent a sack. I won't comment on the second one, the
defensive holding, except to say that it probably prevented an exciting
finish for neutral onlookers.
glenn
|
9.51 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Mon Jan 18 1993 10:08 | 17 |
| The refs calls did affect the flow of the game. McIntyre was holding,
sure nuf. But on reply, on the last TD, the Boys tackle is clearly
holding. Same on other plays.
Consistency was not their, IMO.
Niners turnovers cost them dearly.
A nightmare SuperBowl. The Cowboys, the team that CBS and the NFl
want back on top, the team with the most obnoxious fans of all
time (and fairweather fans, to boot - witness the empty seats a
few years back), coupled with the Bills, a team with a girly m on
offense.
Wow is me.
JD
|
9.52 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Mon Jan 18 1993 10:09 | 5 |
| Tommy B. -
Are you a Cowboy fan?
JD
|
9.53 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jan 18 1993 10:58 | 9 |
| Pretty ridiculous claim there, Dennis. If anything, the league would
want their precious Niners to stay at the top and go for their fifth
ring with Montana playing in the Super Bowl in "heroic" fashion. And
in case you didn't notice, flags are thrown when the penalty occurs,
not after the play is over. It's not like the refs wait and see what
happens on the play and if it's bad for Dallas, decide to pull out a flag.
Joe
|
9.54 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Mon Jan 18 1993 11:09 | 26 |
| C'mon JD, 95% of the world is a Cowboy fan, now. Again. I guess the
loss so shook you up that your usually excellent spelling abilities got
a case of Caso.
Penalties and turnovers did the 9ers in. Without the 1st half
turnovers, game would have been over at halftime. Cowboys did very
well in not committing either faux pas. I was hoping JJ's screw up in
going for it on 4th down was going to come back to haunt him, but no
such luck.
One thing people have never given the Reagan/Bush era credit for is for
ending the Cowboys' era. I think it is little more than coincidental
that the 1st post Reagan/Bush Superbowl is going to feature the
Cowboys. I'm sure MrT would have had some sort of conspiracy theory
for this.
And one more thing, JR, Mr. Cowboys R Us, I'm doing a Sh$%load of
International business, but I ain't gonna use your support!! 8^)
Haven't cheered for the AFC team since '79
Brews
|
9.55 | Got the B-day present I wanted most | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Mon Jan 18 1993 11:39 | 13 |
|
Here we go again blaming the ref with the loss. Both teams got penalized
when they commited fouls. Like the previous note said the refs don't wait for
the play to complete before the throw the flag.
The Cowboys outplayed the 9 er's at the Stick and won. All the crying and
whining in the world is not going to change the outcome. The BS that the
league wanted the 9er's to lose is just that, BS!! The 9 er's turned the ball
over to many times and it cost them at least ten points.
Cadzilla
|
9.57 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Mon Jan 18 1993 12:06 | 8 |
| geeez Tommy, you make it sound like I am calling you a Cowboys fan. I
wwould never denigrate your character (for Cowboysfans, that means "say
bad things about") in such a manner. No one has really blamed it on
the refs, except for some deranged Eagles fan (oxymoron, I know), and
who has ever paid attention to him before?
8^)
Brews
|
9.59 | Cowboys - Just say NO! | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Jan 18 1993 12:21 | 2 |
|
The Crazy Met
|
9.60 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 18 1993 12:52 | 2 |
| Who ever woulda thunk it, an Eagle fan and a Giant fan whining about a
Cowboy victory. Next thing you know, we'll see a Redskin fan in here.
|
9.62 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Mon Jan 18 1993 13:13 | 7 |
| I didn't see the McIntyre play, and I'm not even sure what the second
call was. Niners defense cost them the game, plain and simple.
FWIW, my roommates and friends were whining about the Bills game when
they had a TD called back because of holding and how the refs were
biased. I don't know, I just watch the game, I ain't paid for reffing.
|
9.63 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Jan 18 1993 13:17 | 6 |
| Karen,
I thought you were a native New Englander. How'd your brothers end up
as Cowboy fans??
The Crazy Met
|
9.64 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Mon Jan 18 1993 13:28 | 5 |
| > How'd your brothers end up
>as Cowboy fans??
Inbreeding
|
9.66 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Mon Jan 18 1993 13:53 | 7 |
| Ms. Derry,
Please do not take my remark in .63 as a dispersion of your character,
upbringing or parentage. I was attempting to find the only plausible
reason for such a tragedy to strike your family, and meant no offense.
Brews
|
9.67 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Jan 18 1993 14:05 | 6 |
| Brews,
Karen's p-name obviously refers to her brothers :-) Anyway her note
mentions mutant genes.
The Crazy Met
|
9.69 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Mon Jan 18 1993 14:24 | 6 |
| I realize that, TCC. However, I wasn't sure what context my remarks
would be taken in. Generally, it's not nice to say that someone's
siblings are the result of inbreeding, and I had some second thoughts
about entering it. Hopefully, she takes it in the spirit it was meant.
Brews
|
9.70 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Jan 18 1993 14:49 | 7 |
|
> I realize that, TCC.
One warning is all your gonna get Brews :-) We're back to TCM. Just
remember you may need infor from me again.
The Crazy Met
|
9.71 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:04 | 18 |
| set mode BAAAAAAA
THE OFFICIALS WERE FINE
THE OFFICIALS WERE FINE
THE OFFICIALS WERE FINE
Set mode normal
I would like everyone in here who criticized my comments to tell me how
many times they've seen a RB tackled on a play fake. Now tell me how
many times they've seen a holding call on it. It just strikes me a bit
"strange" that on a 3rd down pass, you would try to throw the ball to
the guy you play faked to.
OK OK you win, (in drone like voice) the officials have no effect on
the outcome of the game..... they simply call it even..... it's just a
pod, it won't hurt you..... All cowboys fans are unbiased....
|
9.72 | Buffalo - 0 fer 3??? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is THREE years old!!! | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:20 | 16 |
| Gee, TCC is sure sensitive... (I doubt I'll ever need information from him)
re: holding
Remember every 0-lineman holds on every play. They get called when their
hands get too far away from their body, which is what happened in the
Dallas/SF game. Very seldom does an o-lineman complain about a holding call.
re: Cowboys
I dunno, I found it much easier to hate the Landry/Staubach (sp?)/Bob Hayes
teams than these teams. Emmit Smith is a great back, and they really work
hard in the trenches. If it weren't for JJ I could possibly even (gulp) like
them.
=Bob=
|
9.73 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:25 | 8 |
| re: .71
Haven't you noticed that even the Cowboy haters don't agree that there was
a conspiracy? Officials may not have been consistent but this is not the
first time or the last time that will happen. But that is a pretty flimsy
argument for bias by the officials.
The Crazy Met
|
9.74 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:30 | 14 |
| re: .73
If I was looking for consensus, I wouldn't have said anything. That
others don't agree doesn't change the situation. IMO, the inconsistency
of calls and outright awful calls had an adverse affect of the NFC
championship game. It certainly had an affect on the momentum. As I
said before, I wasn't routing for either team, I just wanted a decent
game. I didn't get that, because of the guys in the striped shirts. I
guess it isn't macho to talk about officials being a factor of the
game, but they are, just like the condition of the field and both of
the teams playing. To deny that if foolish and mistaken, IMO.
Dennis Faust
|
9.75 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:43 | 13 |
|
re: .74
Officiating definitely can affect a game, no argument there. Only argument
is with the claim that the refs were purposely making calls that favored the
Cowboys.
re: .72 - Bob "I'm a big Pat Riley fan" Mccullough
Nah, Cowboys are just as hateable now as they were in the Landry/Staubach
years.
The Crazy Met
|
9.77 | P&M, P&M, P&M , the dreaded Cowboys win their record 24 playoff game | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Mon Jan 18 1993 15:54 | 19 |
|
RE.74
At what point did you see a outright awful call, when the LB blew his coverage
and tackled the Smith after he broke through the line. Or was it the holding
call that nullified the Rice TD in first half? Both were clearly visable via
the replay given by CBS and the observation of the Madden and Summerall.
The 9er's lost the game on turnovers. Ask or listen to most any coach, annoucer,
etc, that most of these big games are lost due to turnovers. The 9er's had 4,
that led to 10 COWBOY points. The COWBOYS had one, and the 9er's didn't
capitalize on the COWBOY mistake. The Bills beat the Dolphins on 5 turnovers
which they turned into points that led to their win.
Why is when the opposing team wins, its always because the ref's blew a
call and not because they played a better game?
Cadzilla
|
9.78 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | JimmyJohnsonHadAGoodHairDay | Mon Jan 18 1993 16:08 | 4 |
| To paraphrase Denny... I hate the Cowboys, but I love money.
Lay the points.
/Don
|
9.79 | NO D no ring... | BUMP::MMARLAND | | Mon Jan 18 1993 16:26 | 8 |
| SF, lost the game on D. Basically Dallas let them beck in but going on
4th . Following the 9er td, the D couldn't stop Dallas on the next
posession. I really wanted to see the 49er's win, but oh well. The
penalties had soemwhat of an impact, the call in the 4th, that was
pivital. But good teams rebound. Look at last years SB, the Redskins
had a TD called back, several penalties early but over came them.
Plain and simple the D wins the big games for you.
|
9.80 | | GENRAL::WADE | one step ahead of the jailer... | Mon Jan 18 1993 18:21 | 17 |
|
At the very end of the 1st half, Aikman was either sacked or
tackled for a 1-2 yard gain on 2cd down. Whatever, he didn't
make a 1st down. There was only like 10-15 seconds left and
they had no timeouts left. The ref stopped the clock to spot
the ball allowing Dallas a little extra time to line up and
spike the ball immediately after the ref started the clock
back up. They would have had a very hard time getting lined
up to spike the ball if the ref hadn't stopped the clock
because their receivers were downfield. Dallas went on to
kick a field goal.
My question is, do the refs normally stop the clock to spot the
ball? I couldn't ever remember seeing this before (except for
college when a 1st down is made to reset the chains).
Claybroon
|
9.81 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Jan 18 1993 18:41 | 6 |
| RE: .80
Clay, I wasn't watching real close near the end of the half so I can't
comment on the clock stopping, but the Cowboys missed that field goal
anyway.
Joe
|
9.82 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | just another maytag salesman | Mon Jan 18 1993 19:58 | 5 |
|
I was wondering why the clock was stopped, but also was relieved when
the FG was missed.
Brews
|
9.83 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Pgh. is no longer 'PAPERLESS' | Mon Jan 18 1993 20:24 | 16 |
| I was happy the Sowboys beat the 49ers.
I'm sicka San Francisco.
Back in the 60' when the STEELERS totally STUNK, I liked watching the
Sowboys.
Then, when the STEELERS was winning Super Bowls, I loved seeing the
STEELERS beat the Sowboys.
Then, both went into the toilet bowl about the same time, and now, both
are re-emerging(although the sowboys are far superior to the STEELERS
at this point) and will meet nexted year in the SB.
JaKe
|
9.84 | The officials *WERE* fine | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've Got Three Knees!! | Mon Jan 18 1993 21:11 | 21 |
| RE- .71
Dennis, How could you know what calls affected the outcome of the game
when you said you turned it off and didn't watch the rest of the game. The
second half was the telling story of the game.
Of course after watching a full game of the Eagles getting soundly beat by
the boys I guess I could understand why you would turn it off :^)
As far as the league and CBS wanting Dallas to win well that is BS.
Dallas has been in 13 NFC title games and have lost 7 of them and won
6. Hardly a preference by the league. And of the 6 appearances in the
Superbowl they have won 2, lost 3, and have yet to play the 6th. They
have deserved every appearance and were competitive in all of them
including their losses.
Do you honestly think the league had a preference when say Pittsburgh
and San Francisco went undefeated in the Superbowl? I don't. They never
lost a Superbowl because they just flat outplayed the opposition.
|
9.85 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Tue Jan 19 1993 07:45 | 12 |
| re .58
In .52 I merely ask a question. Is that okay? I guess I could
have read yer intro to see who yer favorite teams were.
In .51, I don't blame the refs for the loss, turnovers and mistakes
kilt the Niners. But the calls were inconsistant - and I hate
that.
Hope that clears up this bout of confustion.
JD
|
9.87 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Tue Jan 19 1993 08:54 | 4 |
| I don't do archives. If you can't answer it, then that's life.
JD
|
9.88 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 19 1993 08:58 | 21 |
| Well, maybe it's a rehash, but the first holding call in McIntyre was
definitely holding. No gripe there.
The call that was highly unusual (at least to me) was the defensive holding
call against the 9ers, when Smith faked the run into the line.
99.9% of the time, the back is going to be tackled. I mean, if you're
faking the defense out and they take the fake, what are they supposed to
do? San Fran bit hard on the fake and tackled him, then got called for
holding.
Markbreit, the ref, upheld the call, so I suppose that there is some
rule which covers it. But if you never see that called, and all of a
sudden it gets called in the Championship game, it kinda stinks.
With that said, the Cowboys outplayed the 49ers and deserve to go to the
Super Bowl.....
'Saw
|
9.89 | | NOVA::SWONGER | Rdb Software Quality Engineering | Tue Jan 19 1993 09:48 | 8 |
| re: Stopping the clock to spot the ball
Happens all the time. It just usually doesn't make that mcuh
difference, since it's not usually the last few seconds of the half
in a championship game. I've noticed it a lot, being a Bills fan,
since the no huddle tends to point those things out a bit more.
Roy
|
9.90 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 19 1993 09:59 | 12 |
|
You got it, 'Saw. *One* marginal call. Hardly evidence that a fix was
in. All this nonsense about "disrupting the flow of the game" is
exactly that, nonsense. If a guy gets hauled down in front of the QB,
it should be called, whether it "disrupts the flow" or not. Otherwise
there's no sense in making any penalty calls. It's not the officials'
job to turn the game into an artistic masterpiece. Some games just
aren't, and there's no sense in pretending all the "big" games should
be.
glenn
|
9.91 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Tue Jan 19 1993 10:06 | 8 |
| Glenn
agreed. And it should be called all the time, not just sometimes.
it should be called with equal vigor in the first quarter and the
forth quarter, in the first preseason game and in the SUPER BOWL.
JD
|
9.92 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 19 1993 10:20 | 7 |
| Well, I do not think that the defensive holding call on the fake should
have been called. I think that it was a bad call.
I've got no gripe with the other calls.
And hell, what does it matter.... the Giants are sitting at home anyway ;^)
|
9.93 | 4 turnovers = no NFC crown | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Tue Jan 19 1993 10:55 | 19 |
|
Why consider the call bad. Smith had broken through the line and
was in the defensive backfield when the LB/Spy that had responsibilty for
Smith blew his coverage and grabbed him as he passed him going into an open
area. There wasn't another 9er within 10 yards when Smith broke through the
line. It looked to be a designed play and would have made the 1st down or more
if caught
Who can say what might have happened if the LB had not held Smith. As
it was, Aikman had to throw to a secondary receiver of which all were covered
for an incomplete.
I cannot see how one play out of 80 can make or break the entire game
for the 9er's. They got beat because they got outplayed and made to many
mistakes.
Cadzilla
|
9.94 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 19 1993 10:59 | 17 |
| > Who can say what might have happened if the LB had not held Smith. As
>it was, Aikman had to throw to a secondary receiver of which all were covered
>for an incomplete.
It kept the drive alive and allowed Dallas to score. That might have
happened anyway, but the penalty made sure it did.
Personally, I don't care one way or the other, cause as I've said the
Giants are sitting and we have a host of other problems to worry about,
but for an entire season you see teams running play action, and the
rb gets tackled at the line for no call. All of a sudden in the
championship game it gets called. That's inconsistent officiating,
and I'm surprised it came on Markbreit's crew -- he is usually one of the
best....
'Saw
|
9.95 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 19 1993 11:00 | 6 |
| Does anyone know who's officiating the Super Bowl?
If Red Cashion did a playoff game already, does that mean he won't do the
Bowl?
'Saw
|
9.96 | | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Tue Jan 19 1993 11:39 | 7 |
|
Sawman
I would agree if he had been tackled at line of scrimage, but he had gone past
the line when Romanowski grabbed him. Thats Defensive holding!!
Cadzilla
|
9.97 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 19 1993 11:43 | 7 |
| > I would agree if he had been tackled at line of scrimage, but he had gone past
>the line when Romanowski grabbed him. Thats Defensive holding!!
I thought they called it on Pierce Holt. I might be wrong.
'Saw
|
9.98 | officiating on the kickoff | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Tue Jan 19 1993 11:44 | 33 |
| The only question I have about the officiating has to do with the
very first call of the game. The kickoff. Both teams were lined
up and ready, the Dallas kicker kicked the ball, the San Francisco
return man caught the ball, and then the whistle blew. The Ref
made them replay because he said they had not yet given them
the ok to go ahead.
This isn't the first time I have seen this. Seems like it's even
happened during a super bowl, and I think it happened the week
before when Dallas and Philly played.
So, is it likely that the officiating crew purposely waits a bit
to blow the start whistle just to let both teams know who's in
control? In my opinion, this doesn't effect the outcome in any
possible way, but it does set the tone between the teams and
the officials.
If it's not done on purpose, maybe it should be (being slow in
that start whistle, that is). It probably serves to settle both
teams down a bit, and makes the game a bit easier to officiate.
I have seen games where the officials were very picky early in
the game and then got more lax as the game progressed. And
these were often good games. And I certainly can
understand an officiating crew wanting to let both teams know
early in the game just how calls will be made so that both
teams know what to expect. It's kind of like strike zones in
baseball. Give a big strike zone, or a small one, just keep it
consistent.
Jerry
P.S. Before anyone misinterprets, I'm not claiming that the officials
gave the go ahead to kick off and then blew it dead.
|
9.99 | Buffalo Bills to Win the Super Bowl | BUCKS::DOWNING | | Tue Jan 19 1993 11:44 | 12 |
| The Buffalo Bills will win the Super Bowl. You heard it here first!
Dallas is a fast, young team with a lot of talent. Statistically,
Dallas and Buffalo match up evenly in offense and defense. However,
I beleive Buffalo's defense is on a roll. They are experienced, big,
fast, and right now, playing at the peak of their game. Buffalo's
defensive ends and linebackers won't give Emmet Smith much room to
run, and look for the same defense not to give the golden boy Aikman
much time to pass. Kelly will undoubtedly be intercepted, but look for
him to have one of his best passing games ever.
-Jack the Hack
|
9.100 | | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Tue Jan 19 1993 11:47 | 7 |
|
Hell we both might be wrong, Romanowski was the Smith Spy for most of the game
Since the hole he went through was near the Center I expected ole 99 to be
the one they dropped the hanky on!
Cadzilla
|
9.101 | | NOVA::SWONGER | Rdb Software Quality Engineering | Tue Jan 19 1993 11:57 | 28 |
|
I appreciate the enthusiasm for my favorite team, but I'd like to
note that the Buffalo defense is by no means big and not
particularly fast.
Big:
Bruce Smith weighs about 276, Phil Hansen around 280, and Jeff
Wright about 280 - not a particularly big defensive line. The LBs
are about average (~240 lbs, I think), and the DBs are relatively
short.
Fast:
Bruce Smith is certainly quick, and Phil Hansen has impressed the
heck out of me in his pursuit, so I'd say that the DL is fast.
Bennet, Talley, and Maddox are all fast LBs, but Conlan was
relatively slow to start and a bit slower after about 47 knee
surgeries. J.D. WIlliams is a fast DB, as is Henry Jones, but Odomes
and Jackson are only average, and Kelso's play is all based on
position, because he's slow.
That said, the defense has been playing superbly, and I hope it
continues. I think that the real key will be whether the Bills can
move the ball against the league's #1 defense, especially on the
ground.
Roy
|
9.102 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Tue Jan 19 1993 11:59 | 19 |
| Well, well, well, how times have changed. It has been a painful trek
up the NFL ladder and for the true Cowboy fans it is truly a fantastic
feeling.
As far as fair-weather fans, you find them everywhere and in every
sport. Many people love to support winners more than they want to support
teams. I am sure than the Cowboy bandwagon will start to fill up with
fair-weather fans but it will also include those of us who have supported
the team through the lean years.
Consistency in officiating is an oxymoron. Do Jordan, the Shaq, etc.
get the same calls as a rookie ? Why should the home team get certain
calls just because they are the home team ? Just because we see
something on TV one way does not mean that the refs saw the exact same
thing in the same manner.
Mo' later,
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.104 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 19 1993 12:21 | 31 |
| Re the last few:
On the kickoff thing, I've seen that a couple of times. I don't know
why that happens. Perhaps the crowd noise might have something to do
with it, or even the players being so keyed up they go.
I know in rugby the ref will say to each captain in a loud voice,
"are you ready?", and when he receives both answers, he blows the
whistle.
I don't know why they have the problem in football......
re Romanowski:
I'm kinda partial to him, cause he's a home state boy (he's from a
couple of towns over from my hometown) and I liked what he said about
them being outplayed -- he was honest about it.....
re Bruce Smith:
He's only 278 or so, but with him it's all muscle. Compared to
some offensive linemen (and some d-linemen) he's light, but he doesn't
have anywhere near the body fat that the behemoths do.....
'Saw
|
9.105 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 19 1993 12:24 | 17 |
| From: [email protected] (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc,clari.sports.top
Subject: Sports Digest
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 93 16:07:23 PST
NFL: Walter Payton, the NFL's all-time leading rusher, and Chuck Noll, who
coached the Pittsburgh Steelers to four Super Bowl championships, are
among the list of 15 finalists for election this year to the Pro
Football Hall of Fame.
According to a business newspaper in Buffalo, the NFL's best fans are
in Denver. Business First ranked NFL fans recently using a formula that
accounted for average attendance over the past 10 years, stadium
capacity, team record, difference in attendance between winning and
losing seasons, weather, local economic climate and
cost of attending games. Fans of the Cleveland Browns finished second
and the New York Giants were third.
|
9.107 | hth | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Jan 19 1993 14:37 | 14 |
| re: .86, .87
Don't want you to have to work too hard JD.
<<< ALPHAX::PUB$:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
-< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 73.10009 Honorary Mike JN Junk Note Repository 10009 of 10090
MSBCS::BRYDIE "Nixon in '96!" 3 lines 6-JAN-1993 15:21
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It wasn't funny. Not even a little bit. Please don't direct any
more notes to me. I don't want anything to do with you. Seriously.
|
9.108 | | CUPMK::DEVLIN | Junk Note Free Zone | Tue Jan 19 1993 14:50 | 12 |
| TCM -
I guess a thanks. Is that what he's referring too. I forgot all
about that. I'll have to shed some crocodile tears. Oh, my life
will be so vacant that the great and wonderful MSBCS::BRYDIE will
ignore me. Oh woe is me. How will I live? I'll simply die,
without the wisdom that he spews forth washing over me. Oh the
infamy.
boo-hoo
JD
|
9.109 | TV controls it | MPO::MPO12::MCFALL | This is the end of the innocence | Tue Jan 19 1993 15:43 | 6 |
|
Re: Refs and the kickoff. It has to do with getting a signal from
the network that they are ready to cover it. If they don't get that signal,
then they are not supposed to kick off...
Jim M.
|
9.110 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | take me to Roslyn Cafe | Tue Jan 19 1993 15:46 | 13 |
|
I believe that they stop the clock only if the team made a first down and they
have to move the chains. I concur with Saw that it was Pierce Holt and there's
no way Smith was in the defensive secondary, he was behind the line of scrimmage
making it an even worst call. Another bad call on the Johnston TD, I thought
if the defensive lineman made contact on offsides the play was blown dead?
Dallas still probably would have scored but it might explain why the niners
just stood around...
anyways I still hate Dallas and I can't admit that they won fair and square
and I hope the Bills kick the crap out of them.
mike
|
9.111 | Bush delivers KOD to Cowboys | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Tue Jan 19 1993 16:06 | 15 |
| Don't worry about Dallas.
George Bush has delivered the Kiss O' Death and has jumped on the Cowboys
band wagon. Las Vegas will naturally adjust the line ;-).
On another front, Steve Young's agent is going to press San Fran into
trading Young so he can get out of the shadow of Joe Montana. It seems
that Young doesn't like the pressure like expectations of going to the
Super Bowl. It will be interesting to see what SF does for nexted year
because under the new agreement they can protect one franchise player and
match offers against 2 others. You know that Jerry Rice will be one of
these three, fer sure. They will probably only protect one of the QBs and
I can't see them risking getting nothing for EITHER Montana or Young.
TTom
|
9.112 | | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Tue Jan 19 1993 16:07 | 14 |
|
Well Mike your allowed an opinion also. What I saw on replay had Smith
past the line of scrimmage were the LB's hang out with a 9er grabbing him. Since
neither one of us can prove it and the ref called it it stands, so what. One
play does not make the whole game. Would you be making the same complaint
if it had been the other way, I doubt it so WTF does it matter anyway.
Heres to hoping for a exciting stupid bowl no matter who wins.
Cadzilla
P.S. Mike Here's to your long and continuous hate of the Cowboys
|
9.113 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Pgh. is no longer 'PAPERLESS' | Tue Jan 19 1993 16:59 | 8 |
|
>>I believe that they stop the clock only if the team made a first down and they
>>have to move the chains. I concur with Saw that it was Pierce Holt and there's
The clock only stops for the chains being moved in college football.
JaKe
|
9.114 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Tue Jan 19 1993 17:04 | 5 |
| If SF has to protect Rice and two others, I could see someone like the
Giants trying to grab John Taylor. Now there is a good WR. (And I think
he's eligible, right?)
'Saw
|
9.115 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Jan 19 1993 17:05 | 3 |
| Is Rice's contract up at the end of the season??
The Crazy Met
|
9.116 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 19 1993 17:10 | 7 |
| I wouldn't be surprised that the clock is stopped if the refs have to
take time to spot the ball. How would you feel if your team couldn't
get off the last play because the refs were trying to get back the
football that had been rolled away by a defender or if there was some
question as to the proper spot. Moving the chains can be done while
the play is in action, but you can't play until the ball is in
position.
|
9.117 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | With every wish,there comes a curse | Tue Jan 19 1993 18:07 | 9 |
| The clock stops if a defender touches the ball, but not for the
placement from an offensive player. If the ball was rolled away or if
it was "kicked" by a defensive player, then the clock stops. But, as a
Cowboy fan would say, it doesn't matter because the Cowboys won.
Many ;*)
Dennis Faust
|
9.119 | maybe next year 9'rs, HA! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Everyone/thing needs a name | Tue Jan 19 1993 22:54 | 22 |
| I thought Rice signed a 4 year contract worth 8-11 mil? Rice is not a
franchise player IMO. He's great, but not the team.
When I saw the clock being stopped, it looked like the down marked
was being moved, and once that was in place and the proper down was
shown, the ref started the clock.
The defensive holding was questionable, but Smith was past the line
of scrimmage by 2-3 yards.
I think if there was biasing going on, you would think that it would
happen in the SB especially. The reason why I say that is the SB is
americas largest watched single event. Supposedly the SB is getting
watched less and less do to the NFC always winning, so if biasing was
going to happen, the AFC should win which will keep people atracted to
the SB, thus more TV and other $$$$. Does that make sense?
BTW, I don't believe biasing is happening in footaball.
Heres to a good SB!!!
Tim
|
9.120 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Wed Jan 20 1993 08:41 | 5 |
| I've seen them stop the clock because the defense is taking its sweet
time getting back across the line.
'Saw
|
9.121 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | take me to Roslyn Cafe | Thu Jan 21 1993 08:02 | 8 |
| Yabbut I think when they went to running time until the last five minutes of
the half that they could stop it to move the chains?
Tim, Rice not a franchise player? I strongly diagree with that one. This isn't
a team in the league that wouldn't bid on him. He's the best in the game and he's
not a franchise player???
mike
|
9.122 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 21 1993 10:42 | 1 |
| Under the new agreement, who defines "franchise player" anyway?
|
9.123 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 21 1993 11:04 | 19 |
| > Under the new agreement, who defines "franchise player" anyway?
Each team can designate one player that they feel is their franchise
player.
His contract has to be within the top 5% (?) of the other players
at that position, or else be a 20% increase.
He is the franchise player for the length of his contract.
Basically that means each team's GM decides what franchise player is....
hth,
'Saw
PS I probably messed up some of the details......
|
9.124 | | GOMETS::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531 | Thu Jan 21 1993 11:22 | 4 |
| I thought the frachise player had to be paid at least the average
of the top 5 at his position.
Mike
|
9.125 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Thu Jan 21 1993 11:50 | 9 |
| >I thought the frachise player had to be paid at least the average
>of the top 5 at his position.
Yeah, that's it.
I was working from an increasingly senile memory.....;^)
'Saw
|
9.126 | current contracts | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Fri Jan 22 1993 11:12 | 15 |
| The franchise player is like the protected player during expansion. The
other teams can't bid for his services.
What's unclear to me is how current contracts come into play. Someone
asked if'n Jerry Rice. For any player under current contract, all this
new stuff doesn't apply until the end of the contract term, at least as I
understand it. That's why a team gets the franchise player clause along
with the "restricted" free agents for the nexted 2 or 3 years.
One other aspect of the agreement is that it settles all current and
pending law suits and the players involved with those suits cannot be
protected either as a franchise player or a restricted free agent.
They're immediately free to negotiate with anyone for a new contract.
TTom
|
9.127 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Fri Jan 22 1993 11:15 | 14 |
| I believe I heard that a team does not need to name a franchise player
either.
Suppose Jerry Rice had a year to go on his contract, and San Fran wanted
to name him their fp. If they name someone else, perhaps when Rice is
eligible to be fp, he can't be.
So they name no one until Rice is eligible....
Or that's how I figure it....
'aw
|
9.128 | Rice in Denver? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Everyone/thing needs a name | Fri Jan 22 1993 14:03 | 16 |
| Under the franchise definition a few replies ago, Rice would be a
franchise player, but my definition is a player that the team can't
win without or close to it.
I think that SF can still win without Rice.
Don't get me wrong though, Rice is great! But not the TEAM.
Elway is Denver. Yes it still takes team effort, but he proved he
is Denver Broncos when he went out for 4 weeks this past year. I'm
sure I'm not the only one who will say this, but maybe the only one
that will state it here and will take the abuse that will come with
it;^).....
Tim
|
9.129 | but what about QB? | HBAHBA::HAAS | A Log of Effort | Fri Jan 22 1993 14:09 | 4 |
| The problem that San Fran has is not with Rice but what they're going to
do about who's playing QB: Montanan or Young.
TTom
|
9.130 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Fri Jan 22 1993 14:57 | 5 |
| SF's QB is Young. I don't think that thre is much debate about that
within the team - the fans might be another story.
The Crazy Met
|
9.131 | Pro Bowl Rosters | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 22 1993 15:19 | 52 |
|
AFC
Offense
Wide receivers -- Anthony Miller, San Diego; Haywood Jeffires,
Houston.
Tackles -- Richmond Webb, Miami; Howard Ballard, Buffalo.
Guards -- Mike Munchak, Houston; Carlton Haselrig, Pittsburgh.
Centers -- Bruce Matthews, Houston.
Tight ends -- Keith Jackson, Miami.
Quarterbacks -- Dan Marino, Miami.
Running backs -- Barry Foster, Pittsburgh; Thurman Thomas,
Buffalo.
Defense
Ends -- Bruce Smith, Buffalo; Leslie O'Neal, San Diego.
Tackle -- Cortez Kennedy, Seattle.
Outside linebackers -- Derrick Thomas, Kansas City; Bryan Cox,
Miami.
Inside linebackers -- Junior Seau, San Diego; Vince Brown,
New England.
Cornerbacks -- Rod Woodson, Pittsburgh; Gill Byrd, San Diego.
Safeties -- Henry Jones, Buffalo; Willie Oliver Miami.
Specialists
Punter -- Montgomery, Houston.
Kicker -- Stoyanovich, Miami.
Kick returner -- Clarence Verdin, Indianapolis.
NFC
Offense
Wide receiver -- Jerry Rice, San Francisco; Sterling Sharpe,
Green Bay.
Tackles -- Gary Zimmerman, Minnesota; Rusty Wallace, San Francisco.
Guards -- Guy McIntyre, San Francisco; Nate Newton, Dallas.
Centers -- Mark Stepnoski, Dallas.
Tight ends -- Jay Novacek, Dallas.
Quarterbacks -- Steve Young, San Francisco.
Running backs -- Emmitt Smith, Dallas; Barry Sanders, Detroit.
Defense
Ends -- Reggie White, Philadelphia; Chris Doleman, Minnesota.
Tackles -- Pierce Holt, San Francisco.
Outside linebackers -- Rickey Jackson, New Orleans; Wilber
Marshall, Washington.
Inside linebackers -- Sam Mills, New Orleans; Vaughan Johnson,
New Orleans.
Cornerbacks -- Audray McMillan, Minnesota; Eric Allen, Philadelphia.
Safeties -- Todd Scott, Minnesota; Brad Edwards, Washington.
Specialists
Punter -- Rich Camarillo, Phoenix.
Kicker -- Morten Andersen, New Orleans.
Kick returner -- Johnny Bailey, Phoenix.
|
9.132 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 22 1993 15:19 | 1 |
| I'll bet alot of teams wish they had the QB problem SF has.
|
9.133 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Everyone/thing needs a name | Fri Jan 22 1993 17:57 | 5 |
| Shannon Sharpe is replacing the injured Keith Jackson at Tight end.
I thought this was strange, 'cause he plays mostly H-back or Wideout.
Ti
|
9.134 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Sat Jan 23 1993 08:02 | 3 |
| Gee, no Jets on the team. You must have made a mistake, Mac.
JoJ_NOT
|
9.135 | Jackson? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Mon Jan 25 1993 12:12 | 8 |
| >> <<< Note 9.133 by QUASER::JACKSONTA "Everyone/thing needs a name" >>>
>> Shannon Sharpe is replacing the injured Keith Jackson at Tight end.
What happend to Jackson? Did he get hurt in the AFC Championship
game, or is he just pulling a Fran Tarkenton?
Jerry
|
9.136 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Mon Jan 25 1993 12:13 | 5 |
|
Hey guys, what time is the kickoff for the SuperBowl? Not the pregame
crap, just the kickoff.
Thanks.......Glenn
|
9.137 | | FDCV07::KING | The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!! | Mon Jan 25 1993 12:40 | 3 |
| 6:18 EST...
REK
|
9.138 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Jan 25 1993 12:49 | 1 |
| I hope Carl Lewis doesn't sing the National Anthem!
|
9.140 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:46 | 13 |
| > Nope. Garth Brooks is gonna follow in Whitney Houston's footsteps and
> lip-sync it.
I can deal with Garth Brooks....
As to the lip-syncing, I these cases where they are playing in a
large arena, I don't necessarily think it's bad. Sometimes the echo
lag can be really difficult to deal with......
'Saw
|
9.141 | DEC sending students to Super Bowl | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 25 1993 13:57 | 34 |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+TM -----------
|d|i|g|i|t|a|l| U.S. News LIVE WIRE
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -----------
Digital to host students at 1993 Super Bowl
When the Dallas Cowboys play the Buffalo Bills in Super Bowl XXVII next
Sunday, a special group of spectators will be cheering on the teams. This
year, 50 outstanding students from the 95th Street Preparatory School in Los
Angeles will be Digital's guests at the game.
Digital adopted the school as a community relations project several years
ago. The ongoing relationship with the school involves a variety of mentor
programs focused on scholastic excellence. Digital's efforts have included
programs designed not only to help students stay in school, but to help them
excel.
As the vendor of choice for the NFL and the supplier of all the computer
equipment for the league, Digital was allocated 30 ticket packages to the
1993 Super Bowl. After Digital advised the NFL that it would invite
students from the 95th Street Preparatory School, the NFL, impressed with
Digital's involvement with the school, offered an additional 20 tickets so
more could participate in the event.
In addition to being special guests of Digital at the Super Bowl, the
students will be provided with Digital logo hats and T-shirts, attend
several events, and will participate in the halftime show, which stars
Michael Jackson.
The 1993 Super Bowl will be broadcast on NBC.
(Courtesy of U.S. Communications)
|
9.142 | DEC/NFL to team on LA Kids program | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Mon Jan 25 1993 14:00 | 82 |
| Juleigh Rawlings
(714) 261-4520
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION SELECTED BY
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE AS CHOICE COMPUTER
PARTNER IN LOS ANGELES YOUTH EDUCATION PROJECT
LOS ANGELES, CA -- January 25, 1993 -- Digital Equipment Corporation
today announced it has joined the National Football League (NFL) as
a partner in its Youth Education Town project to be built in south
central Los Angeles, CA.
The youth enrichment project will replace the Watts/Willowbrook
Youth Education Training center, which was severely damaged during
the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The goal of the NFL project is to
provide a "safe haven" where the area's at risk youth can enjoy fun
recreation and educational tools.
Digital, the fastest growing PC vendor in 1992, according to
Computer Intelligence, a computer industry analyst firm, will
provide the nonprofit community project with $100,000 in personal
computers and maintenance. The Digital personal computers will be
used in the computer classroom, computer library, education
laboratory, administrative computing department and weight room.
These personal computer systems will be used to develop basic
computer skills and allow the students to use them as a learning
tool. In addition, the computers will be used in the administrative
areas of the center for inventory purposes and database management.
A special use of the personal computers will be to track the
students' physical development.
In addition to providing personal computers for the center,
members of Digital's Los Angeles Community Relations Committee will
volunteer at the center as mentors to the students.
This effort by Digital reflects a long history of corporate
involvement and service in the many communities across the world and
a desire to improve the quality-of-life in those communities.
In the Los Angeles area, Digital continues to work with the
community to assist students in many areas, including education.
Digital adopted the Los Angeles 95th street preparatory school
several years ago and has created a variety of mentor programs
focused on scholastic excellence. Digital's efforts with the school
have included programs designed not only to help students stay in
school, but also to help students excel in school.
In the process of selecting Digital as a partner for the NFL
Youth Education project, the NFL learned of Digital's personal
involvement with the Los Angeles 95th Street preparatory school.
Based on the effectiveness of the mentor programs, the NFL has asked
Digital to host 50 top achievers from the Los Angeles 95th Street
preparatory school at the 1993 SUPERBOWL. In addition, the students
have been asked to participate in the Michael Jackson halftime show,
entitled, "Heal the World."
Reggie Williams, Director of the NFL Education Youth Town
Project said, "Together with Digital Equipment Corporation, we are
proud to be able to assist in these community programs and encourage
other members of the business community to join Digital in selected
initiatives through co-participation, collaboration and replication
of community programs."
Digital Equipment Corporation, headquartered in Maynard,
Massachusetts, is the leading worldwide supplier of networked
computer systems, software and services. Digital pioneered and
leads the industry in interactive, distributed and multivendor
computing. Digital and its business partners deliver the power to
use the best integrated solutions - from desktop to data center -
in open information environments.
####
Note to Editors: Digital is a trademark of Digital Equipment
Corporation.
CORP/93/984
To Distribution List:
<sacrificed to the disk space god of CAM3>
|
9.143 | The Super Bowl | FRETZ::HEISER | Billary takes U.S. hostage | Wed Jan 27 1993 15:57 | 56 |
| {found this on the net...}
Help convince NBC to put domestic violence awareness public service
announcements on during the superbowl! (talk about reaching a lot of
your target audience...)
For political activists, or media watchdogs, or just concerned women,
here's a quick something you can do to help prevent and stop domestic
violence.
Super Bowl Sunday - which this year is January 31, here in southern
California at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena - is the single worst day for
domestic violence in the USA. There is an increase of as much as 40%
in the volume handled by domestic violence shelters on this day.
To try to stem this tide of violence, the Women's Action Coalition
(WAC) of Los Angeles is supporting the campaign by Fairness and
Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) to convince NBC (the network carrying the
game) to carry two Public Service Announcements on domestic violence
during the Super Bowl this year. Anna Quindlen of the New York Times
wrote a fine editorial in the 1/17/93 edition of the Times supporting
this effort as well.
What I am asking of you - and all your friends (please PLEASE
cross-post this to _any_ lists you can think of) - is to help us with a
FAX/LETTER blitz on NBC, asking for these PSA's. Here is a sample
letter:
Dick Ebersol
President, NBC Sports
NBC
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
Dear Mr. Ebersol:
We (I) support FAIR's request that you air two Public Service Announcements
on domestic violence during the Super Bowl game. The Super Bowl is one of the
most widely viewed television events of the year; it is also the day, according
to women's shelters, when calls for help increase by as much as 40%.
Your broadcast of the Super Bowl will reach a huge audience. By your airing
PSAs, NBC will be bringing to a national audience the critical and important
issue of domestic violence.
Sincerely,
To reach NBC by FAX: 212-664-5835.
You can rephrase or rewrite this letter to your liking, but please FAX
or write them immediately.
Thanks for helping - you may save someone's life, or skeletal
structure, or eyesight.
|
9.144 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 28 1993 13:08 | 6 |
| NBC will be airing domestic violence awareness public service
announcements during he SuperBowl. I think it will be aired during the
pregame show.
This issue had alot of media attention today. There was a segment on
Good Morning America, and WBCN quoted an article from the Herald.
|
9.145 | | FDCV07::KING | The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!! | Thu Jan 28 1993 14:04 | 4 |
| Oh BOY!!! WBCN and The Hearld.... A couple of reliable sources
if I never heard of one....
REK
|
9.146 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blew | Fri Jan 29 1993 09:47 | 4 |
| Once again Lisa Simpson loves her daddy so the Cowboys will
win and cover.
/Don
|
9.147 | It's official! | JURAN::MCKAY | | Fri Jan 29 1993 11:44 | 23 |
| Well I'm a bit out of my element over here in the NFL topic but
what the hey.
I am an unDOCUMENTED 26-2 in my lifetime picking the Super Bowl.
It all started at the Age of 1 when my father put two rattles
in front of me, one for the AFC and one for the NFC. I chose the
correct rattle and the old man had a new system for picking the game!
This years game is a gift. The MEN in charge are begging you to jump
on America's team the Cowpokes and they are going to make a killing.
I LOVE the Bills and the 6.5-7. My guess is it will stay at 6.5
due to the no push rule on Super bowls. As an added bonus also jump
all over the UNDER 44.5-45. Again the no push rule will be
in effect.
If your man has all the fun side action here's my GUESS
Who wins the coin toss? DALLAS
First field goal? BILLS
First TD? DALLAS
Who will score the first TD? Novacek
I.M. Jimbo
|
9.148 | Thanky Jimbo. That's all I wanted to hear... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Carolina Blew | Fri Jan 29 1993 12:15 | 1 |
|
|
9.149 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Fri Jan 29 1993 12:23 | 18 |
| /Don and TCM have agreed to the following:
If Dallas fails to cover the spread against the Bills in SB XXVII
/Don will use the following p-name for one week
"LA Lakers - The Best Team Ever"
On the off-chance that Dallas covers
TCM will use the following p-name for one week
"Certified Member - Larry Bird Jihad"
Both /don and TCM wish to state that they believe the p-names they
will need to use to be lies, but as honorable men will fulfill the
terms of this "contract".
The Crazy Met (for /Donn)
|
9.150 | | GIAMEM::LEFEBVRE | PCG Product Management | Fri Jan 29 1993 12:28 | 10 |
| <<< Note 9.145 by FDCV07::KING "The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!!" >>>
> Oh BOY!!! WBCN and The Hearld.... A couple of reliable sources
> if I never heard of one....
>
> REK
This from one who thinks Hillary is a babe.
Mark.
|
9.151 | Jimbo are you related to Stu Feiner ??? | LUDWIG::GARRY | DALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACK | Fri Jan 29 1993 12:43 | 13 |
| re .147 Jimbo
Jimbo you are 26-2 in SB's this is #27 so you are beginning to sound
more and more like Stu Feiner and the rest of the guys that suck fools
in to pay for selections....whats your number I think I might subscribe
to your service for college hoop,whatever you give I'll go the other
way and have a nice hefty bank acct :') :') :')
How can you like the under ??? the over is the smart play here and
then you don't care who wins because its gonna be a shootout.
Tom
|
9.152 | Yup, I agree to these terms. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AllIWannaDoIsAZoom�AndABoom� | Fri Jan 29 1993 12:45 | 25 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 9.149 The National Football League (NFL) 149 of 151
METSNY::francus "Mets in '93" 18 lines 29-JAN-1993 12:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/Don and TCM have agreed to the following:
If Dallas fails to cover the spread against the Bills in SB XXVII
/Don will use the following p-name for one week
LA Lakers - The Best Team Ever
On the off-chance that Dallas covers
TCM will use the following p-name for one week
"Certified Member - Larry Bird Jihad"
Both /don and TCM wish to state that they believe the p-names they
will need to use to be lies, but as honorable men will fulfill the
terms of this "contract".
The Crazy Met (for /Donn)
|
9.153 | wing/ding ride??? | JURAN::WEST | | Fri Jan 29 1993 13:03 | 10 |
|
re -.147 Mr.Mckay
OK Jimbo, You say Buffalo and I'm all over the COWBOYS....plus the
0ver. Want to try your luck on a bucket of wing/dings??
I'll even give you the 7....
The Giants won...Washington pi**ed on them now it Dallas' turn to
make the final DUMP and Flush....Cowboys 34....Buffalo 14....westy
|
9.154 | I yawn at him | JURAN::MCKAY | | Fri Jan 29 1993 13:11 | 8 |
| Taking you on Mr. West is like taking a beer away from /Don or
Mr. Garry. Make that giving a beer to /Don or Tom 8*)
Your on.
tiebreaker will be total points I'll go with 38
Jimbo
|
9.155 | | LUDWIG::GARRY | DALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACK | Fri Jan 29 1993 13:25 | 11 |
|
re. -1
I think he yawns at you Jim...I believe westy was treated to wing/dings
via your wallet after the bowl picks .....right?????
And just remember Jim NOBODY takes a beer from me. :') :')
Tom
|
9.156 | winging and dinging Dallas to victory | JURAN::WEST | | Fri Jan 29 1993 13:30 | 8 |
|
Jimbo I say its an over game, you like the under so you can have 44
and under I'll take 45 and over for the tie-breaker....why do you
always pick 38?? Is that so you don't forget your waist size?? o'
excuse me thats 42....but still an under....
We won't need it as Dallas will CRUSH.....Westy
|
9.157 | | LUDWIG::GARRY | DALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACK | Fri Jan 29 1993 13:37 | 10 |
|
Wow westy your being nice to Jim..........he hasn't seen a 42 waist
since college he's closer to 46 :')
I think you are right about the over it will probably be over by
halftime,the way Kelly has been passing he'll probably have 4 tds
by half but only one will be buffalo's.
Tom
|
9.158 | Buffalo 24 Dallass 20 | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Fri Jan 29 1993 13:40 | 1 |
|
|
9.160 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Fri Jan 29 1993 13:52 | 11 |
| Number I got in the grid are not real good
Dallas 4 Buffalo 2
4 winners based on score at the end of each quarter. OT does not count.
The 4 for Dallas is easy, 2 is a tough number to hit since it
usually requires a safety, missed extra point, stuff like that.
4 field goals is the only sort of easy way.
The Crazy Met
|
9.161 | slim fast poster child | JURAN::MCKAY | | Fri Jan 29 1993 14:00 | 6 |
| Tom I think your confusing your own waist size 46 with mine.
I've been a 32 since high school.......oh OK 34 tops, well
if I'm feeling heavy 36. 8*)
Jimbo
|
9.162 | Slim Jim.. No Way | STRATA::GARRY | DALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACK | Fri Jan 29 1993 14:09 | 6 |
| No confusing that Jim, I am a solid 44 and carry it well,you however
are a minimum of 40 and it shows :') :') :')
Enough of that lets get back to football.
Tom
|
9.164 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AllIWannaDoIsAZoom�AndABoom� | Fri Jan 29 1993 14:15 | 4 |
| Karen, I thought they were the respective Zip Codes of the Super
Bowl participants.
/Don
|
9.166 | | JURAN::MCKAY | | Fri Jan 29 1993 15:54 | 3 |
| See I told you Buffalo would win, even Tommy is on the right side.
Jimbo
|
9.167 | 44? down to 36 by now right tom??? | JURAN::WEST | | Fri Jan 29 1993 16:00 | 5 |
|
TOM Garry...a 44??? what, the only 44 you can carry well is the 2-cases
from Rockys minus the 4 beers you drank on the way home....
westy
|
9.168 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jan 29 1993 16:06 | 11 |
| Seeing that Michael Jackson is doing the halftime show, they'll have
arough time getting the players back on the field fer the second half
and have to postpone the game cause everybody'll be wretching.
Jackson's complexion is now more like that of someone who was
pronounced dead, and expertly embalmed.
21-21 tie, with no second half till the pro bowl.
JaKe
|
9.169 | Guess I'll put in a prediction... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Fri Jan 29 1993 16:10 | 6 |
| Luckalo (finally) comes back to reality.
Cowboys 35, Bills 23
Joe
|
9.170 | Dallas in a blowout | PULMAN::HEIER | | Fri Jan 29 1993 16:20 | 5 |
| Everyone seems so hyped out on Buffalo....I am going to follow the
trend of the past 8 years and say Dallas 41 Buffalo 13....I
just don't think the AFC can compare with the NFC.
Larry
|
9.171 | DALLAS 31 - BUFFALO 17 | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Fri Jan 29 1993 17:09 | 1 |
|
|
9.172 | | DECWET::METZGER | Doughnuts. Is there anything they can't do? | Fri Jan 29 1993 18:50 | 14 |
|
As much as I hate to see Dallas win I think their offensive line will dominate
the buffalo defense. The game will appear close because Dallas will run over
the bills with several time consuming drives so that it won't appear to be
the blowout that it is.
Dallas will totally dominate the 2nd half with Novacek catching 3rd down passes
any time he feels like it for first downs.
Dallas 24 buffalo 10
Metz who would much rather see buffalo win.
|
9.173 | | FDCV06::KING | The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!! | Fri Jan 29 1993 20:34 | 4 |
| Buffy the Cowgirlymon killer 34
Cowpokes 20
REK
|
9.174 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Fri Jan 29 1993 20:41 | 15 |
|
The ultimate football game. I'd say that neither team will score
and they have to go into the boring kick-off. Where Dallas will win by
a score of 5-4 with a trick kick into the upper left corner of the
goal. 8^)
I think it will be a one point game where the winning team in pinned at
it's own 2 with 1:32 to go. A fumble recovered by the left tackle, but
resulting in a safety to win the game.
Who cares who wins the game, the Raiders would have kicked both their
butts 8^)
Marc
|
9.175 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jan 29 1993 20:56 | 12 |
|
>>Who cares who wins the game, the Raiders would have kicked both their
>>butts 8^)
>>Marc
Uh, excuse me Marc, I think you need to move this to the Sports.Joke
note, and the statement sure is funny.
JaKe
|
9.176 | PREDICTING DALLAS, want Buffalo.... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Sat Jan 30 1993 10:45 | 20 |
|
I've been to Buffalo, I've been to Dallas.
Dallas has better wimmin. :^)
Noo Yawk has higher taxes and colder weather and they are near and dear
to TcM's heart.
I'm predicting Dallas. !!!!
Experts are saying ~44 points toital? (<-3 stooges vocabulary)
No way!
I say total points 17 +/-3
I remain,
soitnly low!
Kev
|
9.177 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Mon Feb 01 1993 08:52 | 12 |
| On behalf of the Cowboys, who are celebrating their victory, Iwill
accept all the congratulatory messages from the SPORTS community.
The rout was a marvel to watch, although I must admit, I did feel
extremely sad for the Bills. Out of the QB class of '83 I have always
felt he was the best of the lot.
More later,
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.178 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Feb 01 1993 09:01 | 18 |
| I think the thing that has to be said (as a Giants fan) is not congrats
to the Sowboys [isfh], but a big pat on the back to the NFC East.
Winning 3 of the last 5, and 5 of the last 7, you've got to look at that
division as the dominating division of the last few years.
Personally, I had hoped to see a better game. I was not rooting for
anyone, not particularly caring for either team, but by midway into the
second quarter, instead of reading my book during the commercials,
I was reading during the game, and waiting for the commercials. 8^)
Those Bills players must be TOTALLY dejected today. Wonder what major
shakeups will take place in that organization....
'Saw
|
9.179 | | CAMONE::WAY | Cheez-Whiz, Choice of Champions | Mon Feb 01 1993 09:02 | 19 |
| Lost amidst the Super Bowl Shuffle:
Five new folks were inducted to the Hall of Fame:
Bill Walsh
Dan Fouts
Walter Payton
Larry Little
and one other coach whose name escapes me.
Jackie Smith (former Cardinal and Cowboy TE) was on the ballot but was
not elected....
'Saw
|
9.180 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Mon Feb 01 1993 09:21 | 2 |
| Hope JaKe doesn't come looking for you 'Saw...
|
9.181 | | CAMONE::WAY | She left me a mule to ride | Mon Feb 01 1993 09:22 | 10 |
| > Hope JaKe doesn't come looking for you 'Saw...
That's it, Chuck Noll....Sheesh, how could I have forgotten Chuck Noll?
Oh, I know, I was so busy remember what Jake owes me for beer 8^)
'Saw
|
9.182 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Mon Feb 01 1993 09:29 | 7 |
| I thought Dallas would win, but wanted Buffalo.
Leon Lett's my new hero... nice TD run.. NOT...
SB XXVIII: Philly 76, Buffalo 3?
SB XXXIX: Phoenix 84, Buffalo 2?
|
9.183 | 'specially on the 1 yard line | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Mon Feb 01 1993 09:37 | 9 |
|
Oh yeah, Dallas didn't do any face-mask grabbing either, right?
NOT!
I remain,
seeing at leasst 3 without my spec's on!
Kev
|
9.184 | | GENRAL::WADE | one step ahead of the jailer... | Mon Feb 01 1993 09:42 | 7 |
|
Anybody want to try and explain to me how the coach/player
talent level is so totally lopsided in favor of the NFC?
This is getting ridiculous........
Claybroon
|
9.185 | | CAMONE::WAY | She left me a mule to ride | Mon Feb 01 1993 09:51 | 15 |
| > Anybody want to try and explain to me how the coach/player
> talent level is so totally lopsided in favor of the NFC?
>
> This is getting ridiculous........
I may be WAY off base, but I seriously think it's the defenses. I think
that the NFC defenses are better, and I do believe that defense wins
championships....
Plus, no matter how good your players are, if you turn it over NINE
times, you ain't gonna win.....
'Saw
|
9.186 | How 'bout those Cowboys!!!! | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Feb 01 1993 10:05 | 21 |
| Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch - I'd give my right arm for a
Buffalo newspaper this morning. Heh, heh, heh...
I absolutely LOVED this one. The only bad part was that Dallas didn't
get another score (or course, they *should* have) to break SF's record
of 55 points.
After just about every Super Bowl, people start talking about a
dynasty, but it's almost a certainty this time. This team took two
steps at a time in getting to the top, and IMO there will be at least 2
more Vince Lombardi trophies in Dallas over the next 4 years.
I couldn't be happier for JJ.
The Jordan-Bird commercial was hilarious.
Joe
|
9.188 | AFC = Almost Football Conference | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Mon Feb 01 1993 10:15 | 2 |
|
|
9.189 | Supe ramblings... | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is THREE years old!!! | Mon Feb 01 1993 10:18 | 22 |
| Early on I actually thought that Buffalo was going to win. They were working
their defensive scheme really well, and it was giving their linebackers some
really good shots at the QB and RBs. The problem was that the offense didn't
control the ball. The key to the defense was the linebackers getting openings
and using their speed to get to them. With the D on the field so much, they
couldn't keep the pace up, and were tired by the second quarter.
As for Dallas' part, their outside linebackers and defensive backs were reading
the plays really well, especially the runs. Every tackle on the running plays
seemed to have an outside backer and d-back in on it.
And of course the biggest factor was turnovers. How a team could make it to
the Supe, and make so many mistakes, I'll never know.
That guy Lett is a jerk, and didn't deserve the TD. You simply DON'T celebrate
until you are in the zone.
Po' po' Buffalo - three in a row.
=Bob=
BTW - does anyone have the score by quarter (for my block pool, ya know)
|
9.190 | Kelly really sips | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Mon Feb 01 1993 10:42 | 11 |
| Kelly, Levy, Bruce Smith and Reich sip. Throw OJ in there.
Dallas was great, but let's be careful about an annointment.
MikeL
Oh did I say that Michael Jackson sips. Androgynous (sp) crotch grabber
wannabee.
Thermal Thomas sips too.
|
9.191 | AFC are losers because their whole approach is losing football | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 01 1993 10:42 | 31 |
|
Troy Aikman is God! Not that he had to be after halftime, but he was,
both before and after. After that it was time for Emmitt Smith to take
over in cleanup duty, making the Bills' defense with Will McDonough's
"best linebacking crew ever" (ha!) look very bad indeed. But agreed,
not as bad as Buffalo's offense looked. I think it might be time for
Jim Kelly to move on. He was intensely pressured but the guy just never
seems to be able to perform under that pressure, making bad decision
after bad decision under duress.
I thought the momentum in the game totally shifted when the gutless
Marv Levy basically threw his hands up on his second 4th-and-less-than-
one-yard situation in two drives and said "you guys showed that you're
too strong for us down here in the trenches, so I'm going to kick the
field goal to save face" (not to mention that the Kelly rollout on the
previous drive's 4th down was a horrible call with even worse execution--
is Buffalo so unconfident in their offensive line that a big guy like
Kelly can't stick his head in there to pick up six inches?). Typical
playing not to lose and ending up the loser NFL coaching mentality,
where the coach justifies the decision by spouting the old cliche "we
couldn't come away empty" (3 points, whoopee) and the players' spirits
flag accordingly (contrast that decision with Johnson's to go for it on
4th-and-four from the Buffalo 40 with a *three TD lead* and almost
nothing to gain from the move except his players' self-confidence).
Before that series of downs it looked like the teams might go in at
halftime tied 14-14, but the Buffalo bubble quickly deflated under
Marv's coaching bravado and instead it ended up 28-10, game over, when
the gun sounded.
glenn
|
9.192 | Pitchers and catchers report in < 4 weeks | METSNY::francus | Certified Member-Larry Bird Jihad | Mon Feb 01 1993 10:53 | 10 |
| re: 2nd 4th and 1, the second was more like 4th and 3.
re: .186 and dynasty
Well as a Mets fan I recommend that you not start shouting dynasty yet. 1986
Mets had a good very young team and never put it all together again. Sure Dallas
might, but strange things can happen, especially with free agency.
Mets in '93
The Crazy Met
|
9.193 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Mon Feb 01 1993 10:58 | 1 |
| Is the crow cafe busy this morning?
|
9.194 | Bill's won't be baaaaack | BUMP::MMARLAND | | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:08 | 14 |
| Hat's off to the Boys'. Great win, huge win, the Bill's will be a few
years before they dare come back for more of this. Kind of ironic,
though, in 2 Super Bowls that never happened, I think if the 49er's
beat the Giants 2 years back, and Dallas this year the Bill's would be
2-1. Anyways, I think Mike Ditka said it best, that this team has the
potential for greatness IF they continue as a team. With the new free
agency not sure what will happen. Dallas has a lot of big play big
dollar players and not sure if the payroll can keep em all on the same
side of the field in years to come.
Bud Bowl fun as always, should have ended with a call from the blimp
saying "I'll be baaaack"
Mike
|
9.195 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:11 | 10 |
|
> re: 2nd 4th and 1, the second was more like 4th and 3.
You sure about this, TCM? The ball was at around the three but I
thought the Bills could pick up the first at around the two and didn't
have to score. If it truly was 4th-and-3 then I was being too harsh
on Levy...
glenn
|
9.196 | did anybody win one? | GENRAL::WADE | one step ahead of the jailer... | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:15 | 6 |
|
Well, I count the QB class of '83 as 0-9 in the big game. Is
that right? I've got Elway 0-3, Kelly 0-3, Eason 0-1, Marino
0-1, and Boomer 0-1.....
Claybroon
|
9.197 | | CADSYS::CAVE | | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:28 | 30 |
|
I totally agree with Glenn about Marv Levy's/Buffalo's poor
play selection on the two series inside the 5 yard line. The first fourth
down call was a joke. I also blame Kelley for not changing the play
when he noticed that Dallas brought in an extra DB. I thought a QB
sneak should be able to gain 1 foot. The 49ers had two successful
sneaks in the NFC championship game. Both sneaks came with noone in
their backfield (it was ovbious Young was going to QB sneak). I realize
Young is a great runner but Kelley is also a big guy and should be able
to pick up the yardage. The other poor play selection came on the second
series when Buffalo again needed a yard and did a slow developing
misdirection play. This gave the fast Cowboy D time to penetrate and
throw Buffalo for a loss to the 3 yard line. Misidrection is fine
outside the 3 but within a yard you have to pound it in or play fake
if the defense is giving it to you.
Everyone seems to be praising Norton for this excellent play. Although,
Norton did have a great game and made THE stop on Davis, I thought Haley
was HUGE. He was constantly in Kelley's face and made an equally large
play causing the fumble that Jones? caught for the TD that gave Dallas
a 14-7 lead. This play, IMO, had a major impact because the Bill players
must have felt "Here we go again".
I didn't think Dallas could AGAIN play a "near-perfect" game but
I was definitely proven wrong. Maybe this level of play is their norm.
|
9.198 | | METSNY::francus | Certified Member-Larry Bird Jihad | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:35 | 11 |
|
Glen,
The Bill's had a 3rd and 1 on the 3 after a off-sides call against Dallas.
They then lost about 2 yards.
On the first 4th and goal I was very surprised to see a pass. If the Bills
run and score that is ideal, but even if they are stopped or even fumble Dallas
is in awful field position. That pass was a lousy, lousy call.
The Crazy Met
|
9.199 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:41 | 4 |
| The only bright spot was the man who coached the "no name Defense" can
fergit this silliness and start coaching a real football team!!!
Bring dave to 'ole Chi-ca-go...
|
9.200 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Earn More Sessions By Sleaving | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:43 | 6 |
|
The AFC won't win another Super Bowl until the Chargers do it.
In other words, next year!
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
|
9.201 | | FRETZ::HEISER | this present darkness | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:51 | 1 |
| Was McMahon from the class of '83?
|
9.203 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:52 | 1 |
| Very bold aren't ya Glenn?
|
9.204 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Feb 01 1993 11:53 | 6 |
| The Super Bowl Tourny needs to be an NCAA style seed system... I don't
think I really care about NFC/AFC as much as I care about the right
super bowl.
It might be different if they didn't play so much interconference ball
as they do today, unlike baseball...
|
9.205 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 01 1993 12:05 | 7 |
| � I thought before the game started that the key to the game would
� be whether or not Dallas could handle Buffalo's pass rush, mainly
� Smith and Talley. They did with ease.
Dallas may have controlled Smitha and Talley,but they didn't handle
Buffalo's pass rush very well in the first half. Blitzing linebackers
kept Aikman under pressure for most of the first half.
|
9.206 | | XCUSME::CREWS | What we have here is failure to communicate | Mon Feb 01 1993 12:21 | 3 |
| Heee heeeee heeeee, guess America's Team is back, eh boys? :-)
-- Jim Bob
|
9.207 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Mon Feb 01 1993 12:38 | 8 |
| How do you get "Kellly (tm) sips" from yesterday? He missed most of the
game. The fumble for a touchdown wasn't completely his fault. Smith
fumbled too, just happened that Aikman was behind him. I'll give the
INT to Everett was a bad one, but I can't blame this one on Kellly (tm).
Reich had no time to prepare, and the defensive backfield got burnt.
Turnovers were a key, but they couldn't stop the Novacek or Irvin
and that was all she wrote...
|
9.208 | Buddy Ball in Houston | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 01 1993 12:47 | 2 |
| Buddy Ryan was named as the defensive coordinator for the Houston
Oilers.
|
9.209 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Feb 01 1993 12:48 | 38 |
|
what I saw. In other words, MY OPINION!
- The commercials were better than the game! I was actually
waiting for the commercial breaks!
a. Bird/Jordan commercial was a classic
b. Shaq/Reebok I'd rate second.
c. Lee Jeans had two decent commercials. Came in 3rd IMO.
- The game stunk. The Bills are now up there with the Donks and
the Vikes as the biggest flops in the 'Bowl. I actually turned the
game off in the 4th to watch a tape a friend brought over about
Bird's career.
- Biggest turnaround in the game to me was Beebe dropping that
sure TD pass in the endzone. Second biggest play was the really stupid
play calling by Buffalo inside the 5 the first time. And here all
along, I thought the Steelers has the worst play calling inside the
5. I guess they've now been replaced!
- I can't remember who, but a couple of guys who wrote _99 Ressons
to Hate the Dallas Cowboys_ or some such, were praying for a Dallas
win because in their opinion, "there's a whole generation out there
that doesn't know why we hate the Cowboys!" Secondly, a Dallas win
also guaranteed them another best-seller!
- Although the AFC has had a tough time of it lately, it was
the same only for the NFC during the 70's when the AFC bagged 7 of
the titles. Actually, between Buffalo and Denver, they have accounted
for 6 of the 9 losses! The AFC shall return, and quite possibly it
will turn in their favor for a couple of years.
bill..g.
|
9.210 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Hoof hearted | Mon Feb 01 1993 13:01 | 11 |
| re NFC vs. AFC
I don't think the AFC ever dominated the way the NFC now does. 7 in the
'70's (4 [5?], as you know by an original NFL team), is nothing like
eight in a row. Even weith the aging of some of the NFC traditional
powerhouses, I still think it's a couple years before we can see an AFC
team that is competitive with what the NFC is putting out on the field.
Most of the last few games have been blowouts, further highlighting the
disparity.
brews
|
9.211 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Mon Feb 01 1993 13:13 | 3 |
| Plus you get the argument that part of that was the Steelers and Colts,
teams from the old NFL...
|
9.212 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Mon Feb 01 1993 13:28 | 15 |
| There was a recent article in the Courant talking about the NFC-AFC thing.
Of the last 7 AFC opponents, all ranked fairly high in offense, but mediocre
to poor in defense. The NFC opponents were just the opposite, ranking
higher in defense than in offense.
The basic premise of the article was that while the AFC could put points
on the board, they weren't very good at stopping others from putting
points on the board.
*IF* I haven't recycled it yet, I'll look for the article and try to
type it in.....
'Saw
|
9.213 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Mon Feb 01 1993 13:54 | 5 |
| Reich didn't have time to prepare? He had 2 weeks, not to mention half
time. DAllas just dominated, so no greatest SB comeback for
Reich.........
Tim
|
9.214 | You won't see this team running out the clock... | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Feb 01 1993 14:13 | 33 |
| Count me in as one who thinks Levy's playcalling was crazy. I thought
it was a bad decision passing up the FG, forget the actual horrendous
call. I know that's easy to say now, but it was early in the game,
they were only down by 7, and they had more to lose my not making it
than to gain by getting the tying TD.
I'm really impressed by the confidence with which the Cowboys play and
are coached, even though I think JJ can be a little *too* outgoing at
times. The 4th and 4 gamble wasn't too outrageous - chances are a punt
would've sailed into the end zone and the Bills would've started at the
20 anyway, a mere 15-yard gain by Dallas. But the one I question goes
back to the SF game when he went for it on 4th down with an 11-point
lead. With a 10-point lead, it would've been a good gamble, but with a
chance to almost definitely push the lead to 2 TD's, you can't pass up
the FG. Even so, JJ's willing to take the risks and if his team
doesn't make it, he's confident his defense will stop you and even if
they don't he's confident that his offense will come right back at ya
and score again. And that confidence obviously filters down to his
players.
I loved it at halftime when Todd Christensen talked about his interview
with JJ and Todd asked JJ if he reminded his players about Buffalo's
game with Houston, and JJ responded "We're no Houston."
One of the big plays of the game was when Dallas had the ball and was
leading 31-17 and the game was still within reach for the Bills. The
Cowboys were around midfield and were starting to give heavy doses of
Emmitt Smith, apparently just working the clock, but Aikman play-faked
and threw a beautiful pass to a wide-open Harper that pretty much
signaled the end for the Bills. Great call at a perfect time.
Joe
|
9.215 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Mon Feb 01 1993 14:29 | 11 |
| RE Reich and being unprepared:
Reich only took three snaps with the first string squad,
and thus, was unprepared.
Now, who is to BLAM for that I don't know...Levy perhaps....
All I know is that Jim Kellly(tm) and the Billls(tm) are ranking right
up there with the greatest chokers of all time: Worn Moon(tm) and
Snuffy Smif'.....
|
9.216 | How do you figure? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Mon Feb 01 1993 14:36 | 15 |
| >> <<< Note 9.215 by CAMONE::WAY "Ok off the expressway, thru the window" >>>
>>All I know is that Jim Kellly(tm) and the Billls(tm) are ranking right
>>up there with the greatest chokers of all time: Worn Moon(tm) and
>>Snuffy Smif'.....
How do you figure that Warren Moon is one of the greatest chokers of
all time. Sure, he took part in the game that saw Buffalo make up
a 32 point deficit, but he wasn't on the field when they scored
any of their points. I think you have to give the Oiler defense
credit for that. Also, he did get them into field goal range late
in the game for an attempt that would have been the difference. You
giving him credit for the blown field goal attempt, too?
Jerry
|
9.217 | | SA1794::GUSICJ | Referees whistle while they work.. | Mon Feb 01 1993 14:40 | 36 |
|
Let's see, in the 70's, Miami won 2, Steelers won 4, and Oakland
won 1. Can't remember, but didn't the Colts win in '70?
Now, I'll agree that the Steelers came from the old NFL but really,
they were losers big time. They were the laughing stock for some 40
years of the NFL. Buy the time they won it all in '74, I don't think
anyone was left from the team before Noll came on board in '69 except
Andy Russell. Maybe one or two others, but you really can't say that
just because the Steelers were part of the old NFL that they weren't
in some way an AFC team. On the other hand, the same can't be said
about the Colts. Other than that, the AFC did dominate the 70's
big time. And as someone earlier pointed out, defense was a key in
just about every win and for sure, all the AFC teams that won in the
70's had great defenses.
As for the last 8 won by the NFC, the streak could actually have
been only 2 since two years ago, the Giants narrowly escaped when
Buffalo missed that last second field goal by a gnats eyelash. So,
that game was not dominated by the NFC.
I would say though that there have been more blowouts over those
last 8 games though but it could also be due to the fact that both
the Giants and the 49'ers were great teams that overmatched their
opponents, namely the Donks.
Sports is funny. I like the system the NFL has right now and I'm
sure the AFC will return shortly. Even next year. To many times,
folks start this dynasty stuff after a big win and then next year,
do to overconfidence, injuries, or luck, another team rises above
the favorite. Dallas has a good team, but in sports, anything can
happen.
bill..g.
|
9.218 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Mon Feb 01 1993 14:42 | 22 |
| >How do you figure that Warren Moon is one of the greatest chokers of
>all time. Sure, he took part in the game that saw Buffalo make up
>a 32 point deficit, but he wasn't on the field when they scored
>any of their points. I think you have to give the Oiler defense
>credit for that. Also, he did get them into field goal range late
>in the game for an attempt that would have been the difference. You
>giving him credit for the blown field goal attempt, too?
Jerry. Take a trip back through some of the archived versions of SPORTS
for references to Worn Moon(tm) and his failure to get them to the Dance.
In addition check references for things like Inflated Stats from the
R&S vis-a-vis his not being that great a QB etc etc etc....
But, he did toss up the inty when everything was on the line.....
The blown FG was the punters fault -- he was the holder who made up the
most exquisite excuses after the game......
'Saw
|
9.219 | wouldn't that be something! | FRETZ::HEISER | this present darkness | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:02 | 2 |
| Maybe Parcells will teach the AFC a thing or two about defense over the
next few years.
|
9.220 | I saw it differently | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:21 | 34 |
| >> <<< Note 9.205 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
>> Dallas may have controlled Smitha and Talley,but they didn't handle
>> Buffalo's pass rush very well in the first half. Blitzing linebackers
>> kept Aikman under pressure for most of the first half.
I've been waiting for someone to jump on this, but it looks like it's
going to have to be me. As I recall, Aikman threw three TD passes in
the first half. One to Novacek and two to Irvin. All three were from
about 20 yards out.
I'll agree that Dallas did a better job of handling Buffalo's pass rush
in the second half than they did in the first half, but by midway
through the second quarter they pretty much had things under control.
I recall Troy being rushed into a couple of poor throws (one that almost
got picked off), but I can't remember him even taking a sack (but I
won't swear to it).
The point is that the only way the the Bills could get any kind of
pass rush was to blitz, and this usually left Novacek open. When
Dallas showed that they could beat the blitz with their short passing
game to Novacek, Johnston and Smith, Buffalo backed off. When they
did this, their pass rush wasn't a factor.
They also quit playing bump and run on the wide receivers in the latter
parts of the second quarter and in the second half. Aikman said (in
an interview this morning) that it was because they were successfull
with their short passing game. You do have to wonder, though, if
Buffalo had stayed with the blizting game and the bump and run, what
Dallas would have done.
Just my opinion, of course.
Jerry
|
9.221 | What consitutes a choker? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:29 | 29 |
| >> <<< Note 9.218 by CAMONE::WAY "Ok off the expressway, thru the window" >>>
>>Jerry. Take a trip back through some of the archived versions of SPORTS
>>for references to Worn Moon(tm) and his failure to get them to the Dance.
>>In addition check references for things like Inflated Stats from the
>>R&S vis-a-vis his not being that great a QB etc etc etc....
>>But, he did toss up the inty when everything was on the line.....
'Saw,
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on what consitutes a
choker. I remember all of the old arguments about R&S, and inflated
stats, but I don't see how this can have any bearing on Moon being
a choker. As for him never taking his team to the big game, I'll concede
a little on that. But it takes more than one player to win it all.
And if you're going to use that as your criteria, there's a lot of good
QBs that you'll have to label as chokers.
As for the interception in overtime against the Bills, I'm still
wondering why pass interference or defensive holding wasn't called.
I didn't get the best view of it, but a Houston reciever was definitely
tackled while the ball was in the air. I guess the refs just figured
it was uncatchable, or already past the reciever, although it sure
wasn't obvious to me. Regardless, I figure that played a part in
the interception.
Jerry
|
9.222 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is THREE years old!!! | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:31 | 15 |
| re: .220 (Jerry)
My point earlier ties into what you were saying.
The defensive schemes devised by Buffalo were based on the linebackers
blitzing the passer (you'll find that most NFL defenses blitz someone one
every play). The openings they were creating called for the linebackers
to cover a lot of ground. When the Buffalo offense made their mistakes, it
made the defense stay on the field a long time, and the linebackers got tired
very quickly (hell, most of them were injured coming in).
As far as the bump and run coverage, perhaps it was the short passes, or maybe
the lack of a rush made the d-backs afraid to take chances.
=Bob=
|
9.223 | NFC offenses > AFC offenses, too... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:40 | 32 |
|
> Count me in as one who thinks Levy's playcalling was crazy. I thought
> it was a bad decision passing up the FG, forget the actual horrendous
> call. I know that's easy to say now, but it was early in the game,
> they were only down by 7, and they had more to lose my not making it
> than to gain by getting the tying TD.
With a foot to go, Joe? This is what I mean about AFC football of
recent years. Everyone concentrates on the defenses but I think it's
at least as much that the AFC offenses are overrated as their defenses
are suspect. If a team doesn't have the offensive line play to pick up
a foot when they need to, they're not going to win many games when they
have to go up against a tough defense that isn't going to allow the
automatic 300+ passing yards per game. The game must be won at the
line of scrimmage. And when you're dominated at the line of scrimmage
you get debacles like yesterday's game.
I don't understand what you mean by the Bills had more to lose than to
gain by going for it in that situation. The Bills had 7 points to gain
and only 3 to lose, and after they missed they were able to stop the
Cowboys and get right back into scoring position. If your chances
are only 50% the percentages say go for the touchdown, and your chances
*should be* (if you have intelligent play-calling) much better than 50%
from the one-foot line. The idea is to try to score more points than
the other team, not just to stay close and hope you get more such
golden opportunities. In any case, I don't think football players come
off the field pumped up when they're unable to convert on three plays
inside the five and have to settle for a field goal. It's almost as
demoralizing as being stopped.
glenn
|
9.224 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Buffalo :== Denver BOTH SUCK IN SB | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:44 | 25 |
| re.181
'Saw, How much is the tab????
Re the game
That moron who ran back the fumble fer an almost TD, only to have Beebe
knock it away at the lasted moment is an a-hole. Cain't wait til he
crosses the line to celebrate, has to hot dog it afore he gits there.
Hope JJ reamed him good fer it. What if the game was 24-24 and he did
that??
Re the commercials
Who won the Bird/Jordan shoot-a-thon?? Loved that one, specially when
they was on top of the building saying something like, "Off the
freeway, off the billboard, thru the window.....etc."
MY fave was the Lee Jeans one where the guy sucks the bird outta the
cage.
Was Dan Reeves acting as honorary coach of the Bills or sumthin'
yesterday??? They played like a team under his command.
JaKe
|
9.225 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:50 | 8 |
| �I've been waiting for someone to jump on this, but it looks like it's
�going to have to be me. As I recall, Aikman threw three TD passes in
�the first half. One to Novacek and two to Irvin. All three were from
�about 20 yards out.
And all three of them came as a result of fantastic field position.
When Dallas had to have a long drive to score, they couldn't do it
(until the second half).
|
9.226 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:53 | 4 |
| � With a foot to go, Joe? This is what I mean about AFC football of
� recent years.
FWIW, Ditka said he would have taken the fieldgoal.
|
9.227 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Mon Feb 01 1993 15:58 | 28 |
| In reading Glenn's note, I was reminded of something an analyst said
during a game -- "It's easier to pass block than to run block".
It struck me that even with a good running back like Thurman Thomas,
the Bills don't seem to be a very good running team...not at least like
we'd think of some of the powerhouse running of the NFC (Giants, Redskins,
Cowboys, Chicago w/ Payton).
The Bills can pass, as can a lot of the teams in the AFC, but there
aren't any real running powerhouses the caliber of the NFC. (Well,
I take that back -- perhaps Pittsburgh and maybe KC). The rest I think
of as passing teams, or as just plain crappy teams.
re Jake:
I dunno big guy, you got of lucky, because when I got home
with all the beer, a big gust of wind came along (something
the weatherman called a Pittsburgh Clipper) and blew the
sales slip away out of sight.....8^)
No one won the Jordan/Bird contest. The one on top o' the
building was the lasted one.....
'SAw
|
9.228 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Buffalo :== Denver BOTH SUCK IN SB | Mon Feb 01 1993 16:02 | 10 |
| Well 'Saw,
I'd rather owe it too ya than cheat ya out of it.
(good thing ya didn't see me there with the wind tunnel fan)
(8^)*
JaKe
|
9.229 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Mon Feb 01 1993 16:03 | 4 |
| > (good thing ya didn't see me there with the wind tunnel fan)
Did you notice how the wind blew through my crew cut?
|
9.230 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Buffalo :== Denver BOTH SUCK IN SB | Mon Feb 01 1993 16:05 | 10 |
| Twas too dark to see the hair. (8^)*
Shoulda just paid the beer bill. The plane ticket and fan rental were
killer expensive.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
9.231 | | PBST::BROWN | Are you a Turtle? | Mon Feb 01 1993 16:08 | 6 |
|
FWIW Ditka was the only one of NBC's colormen to pick Dallas. Of course
with the three Ex-AFC'ers and Will MCDontknow what could you expect.
Cadzilla
|
9.232 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Feb 01 1993 16:09 | 18 |
| Mebbe they did some type of news on this in a playoff game, and I
missed it...
What the heck type of Hel-mutt did the Buffalo safety wear for that
game. I seem to remember he hurt his head/neck some time ago, it
that big thing in relation to an injury.
It looked like it had 1 1/2 inches of foam covering around the entire
hel-mutt area.
I thought for sure it would have been mentioned in the game (I left at
38 - 17) and missed it.
He looked like the SPACEBALLS-Darth-Vandar clone. Huge hel-mutt.
Wut was the deal?
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.233 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | BRoper DTN-433-4336 | Mon Feb 01 1993 16:19 | 10 |
| re .225
>>And all three of them came as a result of fantastic field position.
>>When Dallas had to have a long drive to score, they couldn't do it
>>(until the second half).
If I'm not mistaken, Dallas had an 80 yard drive to make it
21-10. Correct me if I'm wrong.
- Bob
|
9.234 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Mon Feb 01 1993 16:20 | 22 |
| > He looked like the SPACEBALLS-Darth-Vandar clone. Huge hel-mutt.
>
> Wut was the deal?
Mark Kelso.
He's been concussed several times in his career (dating back to college
I think) and the helmet was developed to prevent concussion.
There's like a 1-�" foam "shell" that fits over his regular helmet
with velcro. It's supposed to absorb any shock and lessen what's transmitted
to his regular helmet.
I've heard it referred to as a "gonzo" helmet.
Earlier this year (or maybe last season) I saw a Buffalo game where he
was involved in a gang tackle, and somehow that shell popped off and
flew out of the pile. It looked like someone lost their haid......
'Saw
|
9.235 | (tm) that Will McDontknow Cadzilla! | GENRAL::WADE | one step ahead of the jailer... | Mon Feb 01 1993 16:22 | 1 |
|
|
9.236 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | | Mon Feb 01 1993 18:21 | 23 |
|
> I don't understand what you mean by the Bills had more to lose than to
> gain by going for it in that situation. The Bills had 7 points to gain
> and only 3 to lose, and after they missed they were able to stop the
> Cowboys and get right back into scoring position. If your chances
> are only 50% the percentages say go for the touchdown, and your chances
> *should be* (if you have intelligent play-calling) much better than 50%
> from the one-foot line. The idea is to try to score more points than
> the other team, not just to stay close and hope you get more such
> golden opportunities.
I just think by getting down there and taking the chance of coming away with
nothing is too demoralizing. You need to get points on the board when you have
the field position, even if it might only be 3.
Alot also depends on the particular situation. If Buffalo was down by 21, they
have to go for it.
It was really a tough call either way, I just would've taken the sure field
goal.
Joe
|
9.237 | | ROYALT::ASHE | It's big, heavy, it's wood... | Mon Feb 01 1993 18:48 | 6 |
| Kazoo (from the Jetsons) helmet, not Gonzo (from Sesame Street or
Trapper John) helmet.
FWIW, 3 of 4 guys on ESPN Gameday picked Buffalo too. But then, 1
was an AFC player.
|
9.238 | I doubt they'll be back for a 4th straight shot... | DECWET::METZGER | Doughnuts. Is there anything they can't do? | Mon Feb 01 1993 18:59 | 30 |
|
Buffalo could play that game 200 times and still come up on the short end.
There is no way they were gong to stop Dallas with their defense. Despite what
the experts have said about Buffalo their defense has been marginal (at best)
over the past 2 seasons. Dallas, with it's power running game, short passing
game and decent long ball threat will always beat buffalo.
Personally I think that the Tight End is the most underrated position in the
game. With a good tight end you open up the offensive possibilities
exponentially. Add in a running back that can catch as well as run, and an
offensive line where your young tackle handles the self proclaimed best lineman
in the AFC 1-1 without any problems all game and you have a sure fire blowout.
Buffalo and Levy should have know that they had to do something different on
offense this game. If I was Levy I would have come out with two situational
packages on offense (a running set and a 3 wideout & TE set) and ran the no
huddle at full speed (1 play every 13 seconds..buffalo usually runs one every
20-25 seconds) with at least one reciever running a deep fly every play. Don't
give Dallas any chance to set up the situational substitutions on defense or
sub in a defensive back. It probably would have killed their o-linemen though..
Got to do something different than go down in flames for the 3rd straight bowl
in a row though....
I still don't see any AFc team with a chance at defeating the NFC in the next
two years. San Diego seems to be an up and comer but we'll have to see how they
do against a 1st place schedule this year. I still think they are 2 years away
from being an NFC style power team with a great defense..
Metz
|
9.239 | | FDCV06::KING | The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!! | Mon Feb 01 1993 21:14 | 4 |
| Miami Dolphin Running back Bobby Humphreys (sp) was arrested for
cocaine today....
REK
|
9.240 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Feb 01 1993 21:26 | 3 |
| (I think Kazoo was on the Flintstones, not the Jetsons)
Now back to you regularly scheduled program...
|
9.241 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | oDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noD | Tue Feb 02 1993 02:03 | 13 |
| How sweet it is! Ya know it kinda makes me want to gloat. But I won't.
However it does bring to mind negative thoughts and opinions put in
SPORTS over the last few years about JJ and the Cowboys. I am only going
to mention one...
I don't remember who it was that said it but it was basically this.
>> Jimmy Johnson will never make it in the NFL. In fact I say by the end
>> of 1992 he will be back in the college coaching ranks.
This is not quite a quote but basically this is what this person
said. All I can say is "Head ye to thee Crow Note!" iffin you know who
you are! :^) GIT!!
|
9.242 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Tue Feb 02 1993 08:59 | 26 |
| re the Helmet:
Okay, I stand corrected. I couldn't really remember and gave
it my bested guess.
Now:
I think the question begging to be asked is what are the Bills to do?
Do you think there should be some shakeup in the team? I mean, they
are playing well enough to win the AFC Championship, and according to
most commentary I've heard, chances are that they will do it again, as
no one else has a clear shot to beat them.
But they are not playing well enough to stack up against the NFC (well
the NFC East let's say).
Does the team get shaken up, perhaps a couple of trades are made?
Opinions? Comments?
'Saw
|
9.243 | mechanics.... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Feb 02 1993 09:18 | 20 |
|
Question:
"How many Buffalllo Billls does it take to change a flat tire?"
Answer:
One, unless of course it's a blow-out, then the whole team shows up!
ta boom!
I remain,
ahead of da pack on BB jokes, no?
Kev
|
9.244 | UPI report on Super Bowl | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 02 1993 10:11 | 83 |
| PASADENA, Calif. (UPI) -- What is it about Super Bowls that turn the
Buffalo Bills from a proud group of perennial conference champions into
a band of bumblers?
The Bills did it again Sunday, losing 52-17 to the Dallas Cowboys and
setting NFL Super Bowl records for futility. The biggest one, of course,
was losing their third straight. The other embarrassment was a Super
Bowl-record nine turnovers.
``We knew we were going to make history one way or another,'' Buffalo
defense end Bruce Smith said. ``We just didn't want it to hapen this
way. This is something we'll have to live with one day from now, in the
offseason and the rest of our lives.''
From now on, no one will think of the Bills as being named after
those big, furry animals with the horns. BILLS has become an acronym for
Boy, I Love Losing Super Bowls.
The losses keep getting worse, going from a 1-point loss from the New
York Giants to a 13-point drubbing by the Washington Redskins to
Sunday's humiliation.
``You always ask, 'Why, why do we deserve to lose the way we did
today,''' Bills quarterback Jim Kelly asked.
Why? Because they turned in one of the most sloppiest performances in
Super Bowl history.
``We're kind of a give-and-take offense,'' Cowboys tight end Jay
Novacek said. ``If they're going to give it, we'll take it. Without the
turnovers, it would've been a different story.''
``You can't count on them,'' Dallas defensive coordinator Dave
Wannstedt said of the Buffalo turnovers. ``We got them and took
advantage.''
How does a veteran team playing its third straight Super Bowl play so
badly? This was a team that set an NFL record by overcoming a 32-point
deficit to defeat Houston in the playoffs and had 10 players selected
for the Pro Bowl.
The Bills tried to convince themselves the third time was a charm,
but it became a streak.
``Destiny, that word kind of floated around,'' Bills wide receiver
Don Beebe said. ``I kind of thought we were going to win this game. The
way we lost was very disheartening.''
You can say the Super Bowl showed once again the disparity between
the NFC and AFC, but the Bills were 4-0 against the NFC this season,
including victories in San Francisco and New Orleans. That means they
should have at least given the Cowboys a game on a neutral Rose Bowl
turf.
Except for Andre Reed, Buffalo's stars did not come through. Reed
caught 8 passes for 152 yards, but he was abandoned by his teammates.
Thurman Thomas, who has led the NFL in total yards a record-four
straight seasons, was held to 19 yards rushing and 10 receiving. Wide
receiver James Lofton, heading for the Hall of Fame, was shut out. Bruce
Smith had one sack and Cornelius Bennett none.
Kelly, a Pro Bowl quarterback, coughed up three turnovers in a
quarter and a half.
``We should've had 47 guys on this football team making plays,''
Smith said. ``It just didn't happen. Each and every person on our team,
and I'll start with myself, has to get better. Each and every one of us
could've played better.''
Kelly left with a knee injury in the second quarter, but that should
not have have mattered so much. Backup Frank Reich engineered the
Houston comeback and led the Bills past Pittsburgh in the second round
of the playoffs. Reich looked briefly like he would rally Buffalo again,
driving the Bills to a 21-yard Steve Christie field goal that made it
14-10 on his first drive. He also found Beebe for a 40-yard TD at the
end of the third quarter to make it 31-17.
But even Reich ran out of miracles. He committed three fourth-quarter
turnovers, including a Thomas Everett interception that set up a Dallas
touchdown and a fumble Ken Norton returned for a score.
Kelly wasn't much better. He threw two interceptions and had a fumble
returned by Jimmie Jones for a touchdown.
``It was a big disappointment,'' Kelly said, ``especially the way we
lost.''
After a rocky start, the Cowboys made few mistakes. Their first punt
was blocked, putting them behind 7-0, but the Cowboys did not commit a
turnover until the fourth quarter. Their stars like quarterback Troy
Aikman, wide receiver Michael Irvin and running back Emmitt Smith,
sparkled and their role players made impacts.
As the youngest team in the league, Dallas appears poised to dominate
the 1990s, like the San Francisco did the 1980s and the Pittsburgh
Steelers the 1970s.
As for the Bills, they go down as the kings of Super Bowl futitily,
surpassing Minnesota and Denver.
``To be classified as a great team,'' Lofton said, ``you really need
to win the Super Bowl. I guess we're a real, real good team.''
And they are filled with real, real broken hearts.
|
9.245 | more on Buffalo's pass rush | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Tue Feb 02 1993 10:14 | 19 |
| A little extra information regarding Dallas not handling Buffalo's
pass rush in the first half.
The stats I just read (posted in the American_Football notes conference)
credits Buffalo with 1 sack, by Bruce Smith, for a 2 yard loss. I remember
Bruce hitting Emmitt in the backfield in the 3rd quarter, and forcing
a fumble (recovered by Troy), but don't know if that's the sack. Perhaps
someone can fill in the blanks.
Also, does anyone have the figures on hurries and knockdowns? I can
recall at least one hurry, early in the game, on which Aikman threw
a bad pass, intended for Novacek. I'm sure that there were others,
but just don't remember. I also remember Buffalo almost getting an
INT, but it appeared to be a bad throw on Aikman's part rather than
the pressure forcing a bad throw.
Jerry
P.S. Dallas is credited with 4 sacks, by 4 different players.
|
9.247 | | GENRAL::WADE | one step ahead of the jailer... | Tue Feb 02 1993 12:00 | 6 |
|
What's the scoop on the relationship between Ken Norton and
Jr.? He completely sidestepped a question concerning their
relationship.........
Claybroon
|
9.249 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | AllIWannaDoIsAZoom�AndABoom� | Tue Feb 02 1993 16:09 | 5 |
| That pre-touchdown hotdog move by Lett cost Steve Kenney and
I over a grand. All the more reason to hate the Cowboys now that
I'm through using them to make a little extra cabbage.
/Don
|
9.250 | Enough on Leon Lett | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Tue Feb 02 1993 18:03 | 17 |
| You guys ought to get off of Lett's back. He played a good game with
the exception of 2 bonehead plays. In my opinion, the roughing the
passing call on him early in the game was a lot more important, as
it was anybody's game at that point, and it kept a Buffalo drive
going. All the blown TD did was effect some bets, and there's probably
as many folks who benefitted from it as not.
The guy is just 2nd or 3rd year, already had a sack, and was making
the play of his career. The outcome of the game wasn't in doubt, so why
not celebrate? It was a stupid thing to do, but given the circumstance,
I can understand why he did it. I lay odds that JJ didn't come down on him
too hard, and now he has some training film material. I'll also lay you odds
that Lett will never hot dog like that again. Basically, it was a stupid way to
end a good play, and it didn't have any impact on the outcome of the
game. Why don't you just leave it at that.
Jerry
|
9.251 | what a chump... | DECWET::METZGER | Doughnuts. Is there anything they can't do? | Tue Feb 02 1993 18:18 | 5 |
|
Because he cost me $45? I had 9 and 7 for a square and he hotdogs food outta
the mouth of my family...
Metz
|
9.252 | Bett Lett don't do it again :^) | ELMAGO::BENBACA | oDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noD | Tue Feb 02 1993 19:32 | 9 |
| Iffin you want to blame somebody why don't you blame bb for being a
hero and saving that touchdown from becoming a reality. Lett was only
doing what a hell of a lot of other folks do when they think they are
all alone going into the endzone. Yes it was a bone haided thing to do
though. These line folks really don't know how to act when they score a
touch down and he was just counting his chickens before they hatched is
all :^)
Ben
|
9.253 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | M. Jackson=$39 Earl Scheib PaintJob | Tue Feb 02 1993 19:56 | 14 |
| The guy moves with the blinding speed of grass growing, so why would he
assume he was "all alone going into the end zone"????
My grandmother coulda spotted that guy 45 yards and caught him in a
hunnerd yard dash, and she's been daid for 16 years.
If'n a guy wants to hot dog, that's fine, just get into the end zone
before starting. It was showbaoting, pure showboating. He made
himself look like the southerly facing end of a northbound horse.
JMHO
JaKe
|
9.254 | :*)(*: | ELMAGO::BENBACA | oDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noD | Tue Feb 02 1993 20:44 | 10 |
| re -1
I agree on your first point.
I agree on your second point.
However, he still could out run you :)
In fact, you belong in the Crow Note for making that rediculus
prediction a few years back that JJ would be back coaching the college
ranks by the end of 1992. And for all your notes saying the cowboys
would never make the super bowl while JJ was coaching. GIT!!
|
9.255 | Kev | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Feb 02 1993 22:04 | 13 |
|
As a fan of track and field and a lover of races, I LOVED the way bb
closed up the gap!
The faux celebration was just to add drama - "izzy gonna make it before
lett makes it? C'mon dude, move!!!!!"
Slasher, sorry for the misfortune - really.
I remain,
make no predictions, bet no money!
Kev
|
9.256 | | CELTIK::JACOB | | Tue Feb 02 1993 22:23 | 17 |
|
>>In fact, you belong in the Crow Note for making that rediculus
>>prediction a few years back that JJ would be back coaching the college
>>ranks by the end of 1992. And for all your notes saying the cowboys
>>would never make the super bowl while JJ was coaching. GIT!!
I truthfully don't remember making that prediction, and I couldn't find
anything of the sort in the lasted incarnation of ::SPORTS, but If you
cain PROVE I made those comments, I'll happily take the trip to the
crow cafe fer a dose of UNCOOKED crow, with no ketchup OR hot sauce.
As far as the GIT comment, insert it where the sun don't shine!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
9.257 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | oDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noD | Tue Feb 02 1993 22:23 | 7 |
| Yea it was interesting to see. Intrestingly enough though right behind
Lett was another Cowboy who could have blocked bb or at least slowed
him up a bit but he was looking the wrong way! BB went right on past
him along the sideline whilst this particular Cowboy stayed gawking
toward the center of the field.
Ben
|
9.258 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | oDoTretteBgnihtynAevaHuoYt'noD | Tue Feb 02 1993 22:34 | 11 |
|
This was back in 1989 when they appointed JJ as coach. Maybe it wasn't
you but I think it was :^) Anyway, at the time I sort of agreed with
you seeing as they had just fired TL "the only haid coach the Cowboys have
ever had" and I didn't know how JJ would be able to turnaround a team
that was really going down hill at the time. They actually hit bottom
his first year and I had no real hopes of a SB anytime soon. But look
what happened. GIT! :^)
I may have seen this reply in the old sports topic "why I hate the
Cowboys" or something like that. Not sure.
|
9.259 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Wed Feb 03 1993 08:49 | 18 |
| As a man of some size, I can honestly say that smartest thing Lett could
have done was to have gotten his carcass into the end zone before celebrating.
On the other hand, I can imagine where the immaturity of youth might have
caused that "check out what I just did" shuffle from around the 5.
Hats off to Beebe for NOT quitting -- you know he had to be WAY upfield.
Finally, Lett was moving so slow that even *I* could have caught him,
moving at around 2 MisterPotatoHeads.....
8^)
'Saw
|
9.260 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Wed Feb 03 1993 09:46 | 3 |
| FWIW, Leon Lett is a rookie and not a veteran.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.261 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Wed Feb 03 1993 09:56 | 5 |
| > FWIW, Leon Lett is a rookie and not a veteran.
Yep, and it was definitely a rookie mistake. 8^)
|
9.262 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | M. Jackson=$39 Earl Scheib PaintJob | Wed Feb 03 1993 10:21 | 9 |
| >>Finally, Lett was moving so slow that even *I* could have caught him,
>>moving at around 2 MisterPotatoHeads.....
'Saw, my daid Grandmother could have caught him, but by accounts I've
gotten of your "speed", you'd never have caught him.
JaKe
|
9.263 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 03 1993 10:41 | 27 |
| Subject: Sports Digest
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 93 14:54:42 PST
Fred Barnett of the Philadelphia Eagles was added to the NFC Pro Bowl
roster as a fifth wide receiver. The addition became necessary when the
AFC could not settle a deadlock between Curtis Duncan and Ernest Givins
of the Houston Oilers for the fourth wide receiver spot. When it was
decided to keep both Duncan and Givins, the NFC squad was allowed to
select another receiver.
----------------------
Subject: Dallas plans welcome home parade after Pro Bowl
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 93 14:33:31 PST
DALLAS (UPI) -- Hometown fans will have to wait until after the Pro
Bowl to give the world champion Dallas Cowboys a proper welcome home.
Most of the Cowboys returned late Monday aboard two American Airlines
charter flights, but airport officials closed their arrival to the
public because of security concerns at Dallas-Fort Worth International
Airport.
City officials, however, plan a ticker-tape parade through downtown
Dallas after Sunday's Pro Bowl game. Several Cowboys stars are going
directly to Hawaii for that game and organizers want them to be part of
the celebration.
``We'll have confetti all over the place,'' promised Mayor Steve
Bartlett. ``It will look like a blizzard in downtown Dallas.''
|
9.265 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Video Poker - Parimutuel's Panacea | Wed Feb 03 1993 11:23 | 4 |
| Anvilhaid had Lett on his show yesterday. Seems like a nice
guy, but I still hate the Cowboys.
/Don
|
9.266 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Hoof hearted | Wed Feb 03 1993 12:04 | 7 |
|
It is celebrations like that which make it so easy to hate the Cowboys.
I mean, the bad haircuts, being from Texas, America's team, and JJ are
reason enough, but hte celebrations are sort of an extra little bonus.
brews, who thought they should have outlawed td dancing when Elmo
Wright retired.
|
9.267 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 03 1993 12:10 | 2 |
| I don't think JJ will mind Lett's hotdogging. Afterall, JJ coached at
Miami.
|
9.268 | Mets in '93 | METSNY::francus | Certified Member-Larry Bird Jihad | Wed Feb 03 1993 12:20 | 4 |
| Wasn't it JJ's Miami team that all dressed fatigues and walked out of
a bbq with Penn State before the Fiesta Bowl of 1987 - for the 1986 season??
The Crazy Met
|
9.270 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Wed Feb 03 1993 15:16 | 10 |
| > JJ's comment on Lett's faux-pas was, "celebrate AFTER you score
> not before."
The Amazing thing was how far Beebe had to go to get him, and how short
let had to go to get in.
'Saw
|
9.271 | Another guy who's surprised me... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 03 1993 15:35 | 13 |
|
> Wasn't it JJ's Miami team that all dressed fatigues and walked out of
> a bbq with Penn State before the Fiesta Bowl of 1987 - for the 1986 season??
Yup. And Michael Irvin was one of the ringleaders. The funny thing
about that game with Penn State is that a couple of no-name, diminutive
DBs named Ray Isom and Duffy Cobbs knocked the crap out of Irvin to the
point where he developed the alligator arms and started dropping passes
in the second half. Now in the NFL and up against the very best he's
fearless in his routes across the middle...
glenn
|
9.272 | | CAMONE::WAY | Ok off the expressway, thru the window | Thu Feb 04 1993 08:45 | 9 |
| In answer to Lee's questions about where Night Train Lane went to school,
he went to
Western Nebraska C.C.
according to my sources.....
'SAw
|
9.273 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Fri Feb 05 1993 06:46 | 3 |
| Thanks, 'SAw.
Lee
|
9.274 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 05 1993 08:23 | 1 |
| The Bills fired their GM.
|
9.275 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Video Poker - Parimutuel's Panacea | Fri Feb 05 1993 12:40 | 8 |
| NAZZ, I thought of you last night while going through this week's
TSN. Their guest columnist was Dick Steinberg and he went on and on about
how you can't just judge a prospect by his showing at the combine because
that doesn't measure his *football* ability. He closed out the column by
saying how the draft is such an inexact science and he hopes circumstances
will not cause him to pick a *wrong* player with this year's pick (#3).
/Don
|
9.278 | NEXT AFC SUPER CHAMP | COMET::DAVIDSON | | Sun Feb 07 1993 23:37 | 8 |
| The Raiders were the last AFC team to win the Big One, and Imo
if the Donkeys or Bills represent ( both losers) the AFC, the next team
to win it will be the last AFC that won it. ( LA RAIDERS)
Regards,
MAGNUM
|
9.276 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Bird retires-good riddance | Mon Feb 08 1993 00:36 | 11 |
| AFC 23 NFC 20 in OT in the Pro Bowl. AFC scored on a blocked field
goal to take a 20-13 lead, NFC scored with less than a minute to play
to tie the game at 20. Didn't see anymore so someone else can fill in
other details.
Pitchers and catchers report in less than 2 weeks and real sports can
finally begin again.
The Crazy Met
|
9.277 | sufficient? ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Mon Feb 08 1993 08:47 | 11 |
|
Yabbut, I'd say that if'n it was tied @ 20 and then the AFC won by
three, my guess is (filling in the details as requested) that somebody
on the AFC kicked a field goal!
They are still worth 3 points. No?
I remain,
good at 'rithmetic and specualtions.....
Kev
|
9.279 | Does anyone really watch the Semi-Pro Bowl? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Video Poker - Parimutuel's Panacea | Mon Feb 08 1993 10:19 | 1 |
|
|
9.280 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Mon Feb 08 1993 10:24 | 2 |
| not me, I just jumped to conclusions!
|
9.281 | ok, I'll bite | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Mon Feb 08 1993 10:40 | 4 |
| I watched most of the 2nd half. Nothing else worth watching was on.
It actually wasn't as bad/boring as most pro-blows.
Tim
|
9.282 | | METSNY::francus | Bird retires-good riddance | Mon Feb 08 1993 10:42 | 7 |
| re:.281
Yup, after 10:30 there was nothing else worth watching and the Pro-Bowl
provided the right amount of background noise. That it wasn't a bad game
helped.
The Crazy Met
|
9.283 | Way to go Bobby | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Mon Feb 08 1993 19:40 | 4 |
| Well Bobby Humphrey was shot in the leg this morning. I sure he was on his way
to the crack dealer to return his bad coke that he didn't use.
Jeff
|
9.284 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Tue Feb 09 1993 08:05 | 8 |
| Yea,
Was shot just above the knee in Alabaster, Alabama. Allegedly he was
having an argument in his car. Here's a hoot; relatives say that the
shooting was not serious and would not threaten his career. Jezz, ya
thionk something else might threaten his career??
MikeL
|
9.285 | Rich mans asprin will do that! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Tue Feb 09 1993 10:58 | 8 |
| What a waste! I was imppressed with is straight forward running, and
then he held out and got traded and turned into the dolphins #
reciever, and now the last 2 instances.
Go dry up Bobby, you can still be a superstar!
Tim
|
9.286 | Watta loser! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Crusades, Sp. Inquisition, Watergate | Tue Feb 09 1993 13:27 | 8 |
| Dick Steinberg = my hero!
Cain't wait until the Jests fire him, so he cain go ruin a third team.
The man lies, lies, lies, but he's a good interview - always has time
for the press.
NAZZ
|
9.287 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Feb 09 1993 15:48 | 7 |
| From the "Things I never thought I'd ever say dept.":
The pro-bowl was kinda interesting.
Bye Iron_Mike, O.T. took away your interview, and your team still lost...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.288 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Video Poker - Parimutuel's Panacea | Tue Feb 09 1993 15:57 | 4 |
| Chip, the Semi-Pro Bowl game is on a par with the National Hokey
League Some Star game...
/Don
|
9.289 | DEC & NFL Help LA Youth | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 12 1993 16:16 | 43 |
| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+TM -----------
|d|i|g|i|t|a|l| U.S. News LIVE WIRE
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ -----------
Digital joins NFL in Los Angeles youth education project
Digital has joined the National Football League (NFL) as a partner in its
Youth Education Town project to be built in south central Los Angeles.
The youth enrichment project will replace the Watts/Willowbrook Youth
Education Training center, which was severely damaged during the 1992 Los
Angeles riots. The goal of the NFL project is to provide a "safe haven" where
the area's at-risk youth can enjoy fun recreation and educational tools.
Digital will provide the nonprofit community project with $100,000 in personal
computers and maintenance. The Digital personal computers will be used in the
computer classroom, computer library, education laboratory, administrative
computing department, and weight room. These personal computer systems will
be used to develop basic computer skills and allow the students to use them as
a learning tool. In addition, the computers will be used in the
administrative areas of the center for inventory purposes and database
management.
In addition to providing personal computers for the center, members of
Digital's Los Angeles Community Relations Committee will volunteer at the
center as mentors to the students. This effort by Digital reflects a long
history of corporate involvement and service in the many communities around
the world and a desire to improve the quality of life in those communities.
In the Los Angeles area, Digital continues to work with the community to
assist students in many areas, including education. Digital adopted the Los
Angeles 95th street preparatory school several years ago and has created a
variety of mentor programs focused on scholastic excellence. The company's
efforts with the school have included programs designed not only to help
students stay in school, but also to help students excel in school.
In the process of selecting Digital as a partner for the NFL Youth Education
project, the NFL learned of Digital's personal involvement with the Los
Angeles 95th Street preparatory school. Reggie Williams, director of the NFL
Education Youth Town Project says, "Together with Digital Equipment
Corporation, we are proud to be able to assist in these community programs
and encourage other members of the business community to join Digital in
selected initiatives through co-participation, collaboration, and replication
of community programs."
|
9.290 | Old News | PFSVAX::JACOB | BreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F U | Fri Feb 12 1993 16:18 | 1 |
|
|
9.291 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 12 1993 16:29 | 1 |
| Not that old, Jake. It was posted in Livewire on Feb. 9.
|
9.292 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Quit dancin' on that table! | Fri Feb 12 1993 18:50 | 1 |
| I saw that message over a month ago.
|
9.293 | like I said, Old News | PFSVAX::JACOB | BreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F U | Fri Feb 12 1993 22:14 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
9.294 | Its either "Olds" or its "News" | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Who, Me? | Fri Feb 12 1993 22:21 | 3 |
| Then we should call it "Olds" No such thing as Old News :^)
Just like saying Yes no. Either one or the other but not both.
|
9.295 | It MUST be Friday, right??? | PFSVAX::JACOB | BreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F U | Fri Feb 12 1993 22:24 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
9.296 | But not for long | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Who, Me? | Sat Feb 13 1993 00:47 | 6 |
| Thank GAWD it's Friday
Ben
|
9.297 | See note 9.142... | PLUGH::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Sat Feb 13 1993 15:22 | 0 |
9.298 | it's almost <heart> day! Kiss'rr | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Sun Feb 14 1993 00:34 | 1 |
|
|
9.299 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 15 1993 10:36 | 6 |
| � -< See note 9.142... >-
That's a related, but different, story. That was about the NFL teaming
up with DEC to send kids to the Super Bowl and support 1 particular
school. The latest posting in Livewire was about expanding the LA
youth program beyond that 1 school.
|
9.300 | Ah, the hell wif it | PFSVAX::JACOB | BreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F U | Mon Feb 15 1993 16:06 | 4 |
| I dunno MAC, .142 looks just shy of IDENTICAL with .289.
JaKe
|
9.301 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 15 1993 16:16 | 3 |
| OK, I give. I didn't check .142 until now. I thought you guys were
referring to the first Livewire article I posted about DEC giving their
SuperBowl tickets to LA kids. Apparently Needle scooped Livewire.
|
9.302 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | BreakinMyHeart,TearinItApartSo F U | Mon Feb 15 1993 16:21 | 8 |
| Well, hey Mac, I think the only thing you cain do now about the
sitchy-achion, is set yerself hidden in .289!!!!
Many (8^)*'s
JaKe
|
9.303 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Come on Eileen, ta-loorayah.. | Fri Mar 05 1993 12:17 | 1 |
| I heard Joe Gibbs has resigned. (as in quit, not a contract extension)
|
9.304 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Fri Mar 05 1993 12:32 | 5 |
|
Radio reports in NY are that he resigned for health related reasons.
The Crazy Met
|
9.305 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Come on Eileen, ta-loorayah.. | Fri Mar 05 1993 12:51 | 3 |
| Figured it was that or he was making too much money owning Dale
Jarrett's car... I guess Pettibon will take over?
|
9.306 | | CAMONE::WAY | Are you ready for the real McCoy? | Fri Mar 05 1993 15:48 | 8 |
| > Figured it was that or he was making too much money owning Dale
> Jarrett's car... I guess Pettibon will take over?
Heard the news conference -- he said itwasn't racing related....
'Saw
|
9.307 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | C'mon baby finish what you started! | Fri Mar 05 1993 18:31 | 4 |
| Hum, sounds like he will be back in 2-3 years!? Maybe he just
wanted to go to a different team;^) Wouldn't be suprised!
Tim
|
9.308 | of course Tom G. thinks he's scared of JJ's boys | CNTROL::CHILDS | Mike Monroe is as good as dead!!! | Mon Mar 08 1993 08:24 | 2 |
|
He's just pullin' a Parcells....
|
9.309 | | CAMONE::WAY | Are you ready for the real McCoy? | Mon Mar 08 1993 08:44 | 23 |
| >He's just pullin' a Parcells....
My cut at it is this.
The guy is 62. He was tired at the end of the season, and not feeling 100%.
I never realized how much work it was to be a head coach until I read some
stuff on Lombardi, and some stuff on Parcells. That kind of stress and
long hours has got to take its toll on you.
Now, I remember the interview with Gibbs just after the 500, and he said
that he enjoyed just watching....
Personally, I think that Gibbs has accomplished everything he wanted
to in the NFL (I mean, three Bowls ain't bad) and now wants to relax,
spend time with the family, and have fun with his new, less stressful,
venture, NASCAR.
JMHO,
'Saw
|
9.310 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Mar 08 1993 09:39 | 5 |
| I saw an interview of Gibbs from the Pits yesterday. He said it was
time to retire and spend time with his family. He has a son playing
football and wants to see him play. He didn't rule out the possibility
of coming back to coaching, but said he wants to spend a couple of
years away from it.
|
9.311 | correction | UNYEM::JAMESS | | Mon Mar 08 1993 11:02 | 5 |
| re -.2
Gibbs is only 52.
Steve J.
|
9.312 | Another cheap shot from the grandstand... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Mar 08 1993 11:45 | 9 |
|
> Gibbs is only 52.
'Saw was giving his age in Saban-years. Human years + 20%.
Jes' teasin', 'Saw...
glenn
|
9.313 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | MARCHMadness aka Fall ofthe UNC Empire | Mon Mar 08 1993 12:32 | 7 |
|
You, really can't expect to come right and say the team is old and on it's
way out. The owner sucks, I don't want to deal with a QB controversy etc..
He 's getting out before he looses any tarnish on that "Gene-yus" tag he
wears.
maybe Gary Clark threaten to kick his ass if he came back....
|
9.314 | | CAMONE::WAY | Are you ready for the real McCoy? | Mon Mar 08 1993 12:42 | 12 |
| |
| > Gibbs is only 52.
|
| 'Saw was giving his age in Saban-years. Human years + 20%.
|
| Jes' teasin', 'Saw...
Only tellin' ya what I saw in the paper. Musta been a typo.....
8^)
|
9.315 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | First weekend of sunburn season | Mon Mar 08 1993 12:54 | 4 |
| Musta been the paper's fault. We all know that 'saw wouldn't
misinterpret something he read in the paper. 8^)
brews
|
9.316 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | NotEconomicallyViable | Mon Mar 08 1993 13:03 | 8 |
| If Gibbs gets a job at NBC we know it's only a matter of time
before he's coaching again. Like MikeH said Gibbs could see the
decline of the 'Skins. They're paying tons of money to Rypien and
a few others meaning the salary cap will deplete this team of most of
their young talent. Like Parcells the smart coaches know when to
get out.
/Don
|
9.317 | | CAMONE::WAY | Are you ready for the real McCoy? | Mon Mar 08 1993 13:51 | 17 |
| > Musta been the paper's fault. We all know that 'saw wouldn't
> misinterpret something he read in the paper. 8^)
Gee Brews, the only way I could misinterpret 62 or 52 was if I
a) didn't have my glasses on
or
b) was watching your bodacious neighbor while trying
to read the paper
8^) 8^) 8^)
'Saw
|
9.318 | Free Agent news from WFAN | GOMETS::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531 | Mon Mar 08 1993 14:19 | 4 |
| The Jets signed Ronnie Lott today, and are rumored to be on the
verge of signing Leonard Marshall.
Mike
|
9.319 | | FDCV07::KING | The Jessinator, Not just a child!!!!! | Mon Mar 08 1993 14:21 | 3 |
| 'Saw is beginning to report like Tank on WBCN....
REK
|
9.320 | | CAMONE::WAY | Are you ready for the real McCoy? | Mon Mar 08 1993 14:38 | 9 |
| > 'Saw is beginning to report like Tank on WBCN....
Hey, I can't help it if my sources are not any good. 8^)
But seriously, my paper had him listed as 62. There was probably a
correction the day after, but I never read that little 1" of column
space where they post that stuff -- too boring.
What can I say! 8^)
|
9.321 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | First weekend of sunburn season | Mon Mar 08 1993 17:12 | 9 |
| >The Jets signed Ronnie Lott today, and are rumored to be on theverge of
>signing Leonard Marshall.
Why? Do they think they are that close to a championship that they can
couple of has-beens that can win it for them this year?
brewss
|
9.322 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | D-FENS | Tue Mar 09 1993 11:25 | 5 |
| You got to admit Brews that it would be thighshudderin' to see
the J-E-S-T-S go over the salary cap by signing a couple of washed
ups and miss out on some real talent nexted year because of it.
/Don
|
9.323 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 09 1993 12:06 | 1 |
| Clarinews is reporting that the Jets did indeed sign Leonard Marshall.
|
9.324 | | CAMONE::WAY | Are you ready for the real McCoy? | Tue Mar 09 1993 12:37 | 7 |
| > Clarinews is reporting that the Jets did indeed sign Leonard Marshall.
Yep, they're having a 1pm News Conference today to announce it....
'Saw
|
9.325 | Great news! It's a two Bounty announcement! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | D-FENS | Tue Mar 09 1993 12:58 | 1 |
|
|
9.326 | | CAMONE::WAY | Are you ready for the real McCoy? | Tue Mar 09 1993 13:07 | 6 |
| > -< Great news! It's a two Bounty announcement! >-
Bounty! The Quicker Picker Upper.....
|
9.327 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Arsenio spotted with golf pants... | Mon Mar 22 1993 18:25 | 5 |
| Pats signed Scott Secules..
Phoenix signed Gary Clark...
Bears signed Jim Harbaugh
Phoenix gets da Supa Bowl in '96...
|
9.328 | Super Bowl XXX | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Mon Mar 22 1993 21:52 | 3 |
| > Phoenix gets da Supa Bowl in '96...
The triple X!
|
9.329 | hmm... | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Tue Mar 23 1993 01:01 | 5 |
| ESPN reported that Reggie White would announce on Thursday that he
was signing with the Jets. Both the Jets and White denied the report.
The Crazy Met
|
9.330 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Arsenio spotted with golf pants... | Tue Mar 23 1993 09:28 | 2 |
| Is the climate in Phoenix ready to accept anything rated XXX?
|
9.331 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Tue Mar 23 1993 11:03 | 5 |
| Edlestein said on ESPN lasted night that the 49ers were letting
Holt go to Atlanta and are going to make a bid on White. Reggie
will never see a Super Bowl if he signs with the Jesters.
/Don
|
9.332 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 23 1993 11:06 | 5 |
| � Pats signed Scott Secules..
How many QBs does Parcells think he needs? They already have 3
(Millen, Hodson, Zolak), are probably going to draft 1, and have now
signed a backup QB as a free agent.
|
9.333 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Tue Mar 23 1993 11:20 | 10 |
| Will McDonough seems to think Millen will be traded and Secules
will be used as cannon fodder until either Bledsoe or Mirer can
play or the Pats get an offensive line (whichever comes first).
Pats are getting a bunch of PlanB has beens and want to deal Fryar.
If I were Parcells I would try to sell Irving on staying because
he's the kind of guy a young team needs. All he cares about is
winning, all the other stuff is secondary to him. If Millen goes
it would be the death knell for the cheerleaders. 8^(
/Don
|
9.334 | | CTHQ::LEARY | US:WorldCop,WillPuffChestForMoney | Tue Mar 23 1993 12:45 | 7 |
| Po' Slash,
No Mrs. Millen to gawk at. 8^). As was stated, mebbe the Pats will need
5 QB's if the "O" line continues to play like Mike "The Matador"
Hawkins.
MikeL
|
9.335 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Tue Mar 23 1993 12:50 | 6 |
| Pats are cheap MikeL, they'll never pay five QBs unless three
are making minimum wage. The irony is that excluding a potential
quarterback draftee, Millen is still the best of the bunch. Maybe
Parcells is intimidated by his intelligence.
/Don
|
9.336 | we'll see how bad Bidwill wants to win | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Tue Mar 23 1993 15:32 | 3 |
| Cards need to re-sign Tim McDonald or the Clark signing won't bring
them much. Rumor has it that Phoenix and San Francisco have offers on
the table to Tim.
|
9.337 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Wed Mar 24 1993 09:48 | 9 |
|
The Patriots have a master plan. The reason for so many quarterbacks
is they are planning to trade straight up two quarterbacks for a
halfback or perhaps four quarterbacks for a full back.
HTH
Marc
|
9.338 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | darn, better cancel my bikini wax | Thu Mar 25 1993 10:50 | 7 |
|
You're joking right Slasher? Fryar only cares about winning? Why the heck
can't he catch consistantly then? Fryar cares about Fryar period! Always
has, always will....
mike
|
9.340 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Thu Mar 25 1993 11:02 | 5 |
| >> Look no further than his dropped pass in the Orange Bowl
What/when was that play??
The Crazy Met
|
9.341 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 25 1993 11:43 | 1 |
| I hear Jim McMahon was signed by the Vikings.
|
9.342 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Thu Mar 25 1993 13:05 | 7 |
| Re: .339
Fryar dropped a perfectly thrown touchdown pass in the 82? Orange Bowl
that would have given an awesome Nebraska team the national
championship.
Steve
|
9.343 | more for your money | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Thu Mar 25 1993 13:47 | 10 |
| >> <<< Note 9.337 by CSC32::M_MACGREGOR >>>
>>
>>
>> The Patriots have a master plan. The reason for so many quarterbacks
>> is they are planning to trade straight up two quarterbacks for a
>> halfback or perhaps four quarterbacks for a full back.
If it wuz me, I would trade one quarterback for five nickel backs!
Jerry
|
9.344 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Not that there's anything wrong w/ that | Thu Mar 25 1993 14:13 | 3 |
| I heard Jim McMahon is a Viking... Green hopes to get 11 games out
of him...
|
9.345 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shore,Brimsek,Orr,Bourque | Thu Mar 25 1993 14:30 | 6 |
| > I heard Jim McMahon is a Viking... Green hopes to get 11 games out
> of him...
Did anyone tell Hawk?
|
9.346 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Mar 26 1993 11:35 | 8 |
| Fryar gets a bad rap in this town. His only problem the last
few years is that the other Patriot wide receivers would have a
hard time making a TopTen college team. Anybody see the new Pats
logo? It sips! Looks like the "Old Man In the Mountain" on LSD.
Makes the old logo with the guy squattin' over the football look
good. 8^(
/Don
|
9.347 | Yeah, it's RoboPatsy | CTHQ::LEARY | WACO: WeAin'tComin'Out | Fri Mar 26 1993 11:49 | 1 |
|
|
9.348 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | UNC-ExcellentLossInWaiting | Fri Mar 26 1993 11:59 | 4 |
| Yeah what a sissy logo. So much for the Parcells image of mainly
football. 8^(
/Don
|
9.349 | | CAMONE::WAY | Shane, The Wonder Dog | Fri Mar 26 1993 12:02 | 7 |
| > Yeah what a sissy logo. So much for the Parcells image of mainly
> football. 8^(
Another GREAT logo bites the dust.
'Saw
|
9.350 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | darn, better cancel my bikini wax | Fri Mar 26 1993 12:33 | 4 |
|
Yeah Slash and Fryar never did anything to deserve that "bum rap"???
;^)
|
9.351 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel | Fri Mar 26 1993 15:23 | 1 |
| McMahon was traded!!!
|
9.352 | True? | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Like a Fresh of Breath air! | Fri Mar 26 1993 22:07 | 1 |
| To who? For what? Why? When? How? Where?
|
9.353 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | Where's Waldo? | Mon Mar 29 1993 07:51 | 8 |
| You got it right, MikeC. Fryar went out and earned any bum rap he
carries. He had the physical tools; speed, great moves, good hands.
Unfortunately, to me, he lacked the one essential thing that is need in
all sports: concentration. He'd work at getting open, then turn on a
burst of speed, only to DROP the damn ball. Far too many of those type
of plays in his early years.
lEe
|
9.354 | No discussion about Reggie being a Packer | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Wed Apr 07 1993 15:56 | 2 |
| Reggie "minister of DEFense" White is now a very rich Green bay Packer.
|
9.355 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ComeToMiami-AndGiveUsYourMoney! | Wed Apr 07 1993 18:04 | 4 |
| I'm glad God told Reggie what I would have. Money talks and
BS walks.
/Don
|
9.356 | Super Joe makes another visit | FRETZ::HEISER | Spam & Eggs, Spam, Spam | Thu Apr 15 1993 23:35 | 9 |
| "If Joe Montana comes here, him and Sir Charles are gonna rule
Phoenix." - Cardinal receiver Gary Clark
Joe paid another surprise visit this afternoon and worked out with the
Cards. People around here are getting excited since Phoenix is
definitely in Joe's top 2 (Kansas City the other). I might even have
to start a Cards topic ;-)
MoS(C)
|
9.357 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | GO PENS!!!!!! | Fri Apr 16 1993 00:01 | 7 |
| Joe M. is a has been, and anybody who signs him fer any sizable amount
of cash is going to be pumping good money down the ol toilet.
Ya heerd it here first
JaKe
|
9.358 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | If you see Kay | Fri Apr 16 1993 11:04 | 12 |
| Yes and no. I take it the Cards are scrapping Timm Rosenbah (sp?)?
He is injury prone. Chris Chandler is a back-up.
Look at KC, they've been looking for a good QB since Len Dawson;^)
Minny, TB, Pats, Seattle, faids, & jets are other teams that need a
QB, and Joe appearently can still throw.
I agree that the $$$$ may be steep.
Tim
|
9.359 | A community service message! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Fri Apr 16 1993 11:51 | 320 |
| PLAYERS SIGNED OR LOST DUE TO FREE AGENCY - AND LIST OF TRADES (As of
4/14):
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
space = unrestricted free agent
r = restricted free agent
x = resigned with old team
m = matched
t = transitional player
T = trade
L = player lost due to FA
ATLANTA FALCONS
---------------
x- Mike Gann, dl, Atlanta
t- Pierce Holt, de, San Francisco
James Geathers, dl, Washington
Melvin Jenkins, cb, Detroit
T- DB Vince Clark from Green Bay for 4th round pick in 1993.
T- S Alton Montgomery from Denver for 1993 3rd & 7th round picks
L- Houston Hoover, ol (Cleveland)
L- Bill Fralic, ot (Detroit)
L- John Washington, de (New England)
L- Wade Wilson, qb (New Orleans)
BUFFALO BILLS
-------------
x- Adam Lingner, c, Buffalo
m- Jeff Wright, dt, Buffalo (San Francisco)
r- Glen Parker, og, Buffalo
Billy Brooks, wr, Indianapolis
L- Will Woolford, ot (Indianapolis)
L- Shane Conlan, lb (LA Rams)
L- Carlton Bailey, lb (NY Giants)
CHICAGO BEARS
-------------
r- Joe Cain, lb, Seattle
x- Jim Harbough, qb, Chicago
x- Trace Armstrong, de, Chicago
x- Steve McMichael, dt, Chicago
x- Glen Kozlowski, wr, Chicago
Craig Heyward, fb, New Orleans
L- James Thornton, te (NY Jets)
CINCINNATI BENGALS
-------------------
Sheldon White, db, Detroit
T- 1993 3rd round pick from NY Jets for QB Boomer Esiason
L- Rodney Holman, te (Detroit)
L- Eric Thomas, cb (NY Jets)
L- Tim McGee, wr (Washington)
CLEVELAND BROWNS
----------------
Houston Hoover, og, Atlanta
Reggie Rutland, cb, Minnesota
Vinny Testaverde, qb, Tampa Bay
Mark Carrier, wr, Tampa Bay
L- Mark Bavaro, te (Philadelphia)
L- Mike Tomczak, qb (Pittsburgh)
DALLAS COWBOYS
--------------
x- Charles Haley, de, Dallas
L- Kelvin Martin, wr (Seattle)
DENVER BRONCOS
--------------
Rod Bernstine, rb, San Diego
Don Maggs, ot, Houston
Brian Habib, og, Minnesota
Robert Delpino, rb, LA Rams
T- 1993 3rd & 7th round picks from Atlanta for S Alton Montgomery
T- 1993 3rd round pick from LA Raiders for RB Gaston Green
L- Mark Jackson, wr (NY Giants)
DETROIT LIONS
-------------
x- William White, db, Detroit
Rodney Holman, te, Cincinnati
David Lutz, og, Kansas City
Bill Fralic, ot, Atlanta
Dave Richards, ol, San Diego
L- Melvin Jenkins, cb (Atlanta)
L- Sheldon White, db (Cincinnati)
GREEN BAY PACKERS
-----------------
x- Roland Mitchell, db, Green Bay
x- James Campen, c, Green Bay
Reggie White, de, Philadelphia
Bill Maas, nt, Kansas City
Harry Galbreath, og, Miami
Tunch Ilkin, ol, Pittsburgh
Ervin Randle, lb, Kansas City
Robert Wilson, fb, Tampa Bay
Jesse Anderson, te, Tampa Bay
T- 1993 4th round pick from Atlanta for DB Vince Clark
T- RB John Stephens from New Engand for 1993 4th round pick
T- QB Ken O'Brien from NY Jets for 1993 5th round pick
L- Chuck Cecil, s (Phoenix)
L- Don Majkowski, qb
HOUSTON OILERS
-------------
x- Eugene Seale, lb, Houston
x- Cody Carlson qb, Houston
L- Don Maggs, ot (Denver)
INDIANAPOLIS COLTS
------------------
x- Jessie Hester, wr, Indianapolis
x- Clarence Verdin, wr, Indianapolis
Kirk Lowdermilk, c, Minnesota
t- Will Wolford, ot, Buffalo
L- Billy Brooks, wr (Buffalo)
KANSAS CITY CHIEFS
------------------
r- David Szott, og, Kansas City
r- JJ Birden, wr, Kansas City
r- eonard Griffin, de, Kansas City
L- Bill Maas, dt (Geen Bay)
L- David Lutz, og (Detroit)
L- Ervin Randle lb (Green Bay)
LOS ANGELES RAIDERS
-------------------
x- Vince Evans, qb, LA Raiders
x- Jeff Gossett, p, LA Raiders
Jeff Hostetler, qb, NY Giants
Gerald Perry, ot, LA Rams
T- RB Gaston Green from Denver for 1993 3rd rond pick
L- Ronnie Lott, s (NY Jets)
LOS ANGELES RAMS
----------------
x- Gerald Robinson, dl, LA Rams
Irv Eatman, ot, NY Jets
Fred Stokes, de, Washington
Shane Conlan, lb, Buffalo
Henry Rolling, lb, San Dieg
L- Robert Delpino, rb (Denver)
L- Gerald Perry, ot(LA Rams)
L- Kevin Greene, lb (Pittsburgh)
L- Joe Millinichik, og (Seattle)
MIAMI DOLPHINS
--------------
Mark Ingram, wr, NY Giants
T- WR Irving Fryar from New England for 1993 2nd & 1994 3rd round pick
L- Mark Clayton, wr
L- Harry Galbreath, og (Green Bay)
L- Scott Secules, qb (New England)
L- Ferrell Edmunds, te (Seattle)
MINNESOTA VIKINGS
-----------------
x- Sean Salisbury, qb, Minnesota
Jim McMahon, qb, Philadelphia
L- Al Noga, de
L- Kirk Lowdermik, c (Indianapolis)
L- Reggie Rutland, cb (Cleveland
L- Brian Habib, ot (Denver)
NEW ENGLAND PATROITS
-------------------
John Washington, de, Atlanta
Steve Trapilo, ol, New Orleans
Leon Seals, de, Philadelphia
Aaron Jones, de, Pittsburgh
Scott Secules, qb, Miami
T- 1993 4th round pick from Green Bay for RB John Stephens
T- 1993 2nd & 1994 3rd round pick from Miami for WR Irving Fyar
L- No one as of 4/14
NEW ORLEANS SAINTS
------------------
x- Les Miller, nt, New Orleans
Wade Wilson, qb, Atlanta
L- Bobby Hebert, qb
L- Crig Heyward, fb (Chicago)
L- Steve Trapilo, ol (New Egland)
NEW YORK GIANTS
---------------
x- Phil Simms, qb, NY Giants
x- Sean Landeta, p, NY Giants
x- Lawrence Taylor, lb, NY Giants
Carlton Bailey, lb, Buffalo
Mark Jackson, wr, Denver
Mike Sherrard, wr, San Francisco
L- Jeff Hostetler, qb (LA Raiders)
L- Mark Ingram, wr (Miami)
L- Leonard Marshall, dl (NY Jets)
NEW YORK JETS
-------------
x- Chris Burkett, wr, NY Jets
x- Scott Mersereau, dl, NY Jets
x- Paul Frase, dl, NY Jets
Ronnie Lott, s, LA Raiders
Leonard Marshall,dl, NY Giants
Eric Thomas, db, Cincinnati
Jame Thornton, te, Chicago
T- QB Boomer Esiason from Cincinnati for 1993 3rd round pick
T- 1993 5th round pck from Green Bay for QB Ken O'Brien
L- Irv Eatman, ot (LA Rams)
PHILADELPHIA EAGLES
-------------------
Mark Bavaro, te, Cleveland
L- Reggie White, de (Green Bay)
L- Jim McMahon, qb (Minnesota)
L- Leon Seals, de (New England)
L- John Booty, db (Phoenix)
L- David Archer, qb (CFL)
PHOENIX CARDINALS
-----------------
x- Tyrone Stowe, lb, Phoenix
John Booty, db, Philadelphia
Gary Clark, wr, Washington
Chuck Cecl, s, Green Bay
T- 1993 undisclosed draft pick from ansas City for DB Jay Taylor
L- Tim McDonald, s (San Francisco)
PITTSBURGH STEELERS
-------------------
Greg Clark, lb, Seattle
Kevin Greene, lb, LA Rams
Mike Tomczak, qb, Cleveland
m- Neil O'Donnell, qb, Pittsburgh (Tampa Bay)
L- Tunch Ilkin, ot (Green Bay)
L- Hardy Nickerson, lb (Tampa Bay)
L- Aaron Jones, de (New England)
SAN DIEGO CHARGERS
------------------
Joe Millinichik, og, LA Rams
Brian Davis, b, Seattle
r- Jerrol Williams, lb, Pittsburgh
L- Ro Bernstine, rb (Denver)
L- David Richards, ol (Detrot)
L- Henry Rolling, lb (LA Rams)
SAN FRANCISCO 49ers
-------------------
x- Bill Romanowski, lb, San Francisco
x- Steve Bono, qb, San Francisco
Tim McDonald, s, Phoenix
L- Pierce Holt, dl (Atlanta)
L- Mike Sherrard, wr (NY Giants)
SEATTLE SEAHAWKS
----------------
Ferrell Edmunds, te, Miami
Kelvin Martin, wr, Dallas
x- Trey Junkin, te, Seattle
L- Joe Cain, lb (Chicago)
L- Greg Clark, lb (Pittsburgh)
L- rian Davis, db (SaBn Diego)
TAMPA BAY BUCCANEERS
--------------------
Hardy Nickerson, lb, Pittsburgh Martin Mayhew, cb, Washington
m- Tony Mayberry, c, Tampa Bay (New England)
L- Vinny Testaverde, qb (Cleveland)
L- Mark Carrier, wr (Cleveland)
L- Robert Wilson, fb (Green Bay)
L- Jesse Anderson, te (Green Bay)
WASHINGTON REDSKINS
-------------------
x- Brad Edwards, db, Washington
x- Kurt Gouveia, lb, Washington
x- Danny Copeland, db, Washington
x- Tim Johnson, dt, Washington
Tim McGee, wr, Cincinnati
L- Gary Clark, wr (Phoenix)
L- Martin Mayhew, cb (Tampa Bay)
L- James Geathers, dl (Atlanta)
L- Fred Stokes, de (LA Rams)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
THE END
Carlitos
|
9.360 | | METSNY::francus | ABP | Fri Apr 16 1993 14:00 | 6 |
| re: .358
Jets just got Esiason who will cost them 2.3 million so I doubt
they would have any interest in Montana.
The Crazy Met
|
9.361 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Apr 16 1993 16:28 | 6 |
| � Minny, TB, Pats, Seattle, faids, & jets are other teams that need a
� QB, and Joe appearently can still throw.
The Pats have 5 QBs and will probably draft another. They don't need
another one. Besides, Parcells doesn't need a real QB in his offense.
He showed he can win with guys like Simms and Hoss.
|
9.362 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | If you see Kay | Fri Apr 16 1993 18:47 | 1 |
| Good point Mac
|
9.363 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Spam & Eggs, Spam, Spam | Fri Apr 16 1993 21:15 | 11 |
| Super Joe may not be washed up. In his workout here yesterday, he
overthrew Randall "Thrill" Hill on a bomb pattern. Hill is one of the
fastest receivers around the league.
The Cards have offered their 20th pick of the 1st round (they have
another earlier). S.F. seems to be agreeable with that, especially
when K.C. is trying to get him for nothing.
Timm Rosenbach, besides being injury-prone, hasn't decided if he wants
to continue playing football for a living. Phoenix also has Tony Sacca
(Penn St.) has their current #3 QB.
|
9.364 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Pens Go Fer 3 in '93!! | Fri Apr 16 1993 22:33 | 21 |
|
>> <<< Note 9.363 by FRETZ::HEISER "Spam & Eggs, Spam, Spam" >>>
>>Super Joe may not be washed up. In his workout here yesterday, he
>>overthrew Randall "Thrill" Hill on a bomb pattern. Hill is one of the
>>fastest receivers around the league.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoohhhhhhhh, Super Joe cain "overthrow" a receiver.
Guess whoever he plays fer goes to the Bowl and Disneyworld nexted
year, huh???
C'mon, Brister has overthrown Lipps and Stallworth and many others in
his career and he ain't doin crap now. Probably be out of a job come
summer.
Overthrowing is just missed timing, nothing more nothing less. If ya
ain't got decent timing, ya ain't goin' no freakin' place.
JaKe
|
9.365 | Super Joe wif da Cards huh? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Put your hope in God! | Sat Apr 17 1993 10:28 | 5 |
| Well Jakey, I think we all know that Joe's got timing...the thing about
Joe that was questionable was how good that arm is...and overthrowing
speedy receivers is a good thing. HtH
Carlitos
|
9.366 | it's in Debartolo's court now | FRETZ::HEISER | Spam & Eggs, Spam, Spam | Sat Apr 17 1993 14:21 | 9 |
| Agreed Carlos. Timing improves the more he plays. The strength of his
arm was the question mark. Although, his career could be over the next
time he gets hit.
It's pretty much over now though. He's picked K.C., being a contender,
and working with his old coaches helped. They also upgraded their
offer from a 3rd round to their 18th pick.
Mike
|
9.367 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | ABP | Sat Apr 17 1993 22:41 | 6 |
| And SF wants "other considerations" whatever the heck that means. So
far
no deal.
The Crazy Met
|
9.368 | | GENRAL::WADE | yippy-I-yo-mama! | Mon Apr 19 1993 10:19 | 9 |
|
I think SF is crazy if they let Joe go. I didn't see ole Steve
Young take 'em to the promised land last year. Young is good
but it seems, to me anyway, that he gets flustered if it's a
tight game.
Joe's a winner.........
Claybroon
|
9.369 | Phoenix is back on the table | FRETZ::HEISER | Spam & Eggs, Spam, Spam | Mon Apr 19 1993 13:35 | 4 |
| Now Debartolo is saying if he goes anywhere, he's going to Phoenix.
Should be interesting how this pans out...
Mike
|
9.370 | Oh where O where does little Joe go ? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Will Note for food | Mon Apr 19 1993 19:03 | 4 |
| DeBartelo has matched the KC offer sheet and named Montana the starting QB.
What is the deal today I heard he is going to make a decision today ?
Jeff
|
9.371 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | ABP | Tue Apr 20 1993 01:17 | 7 |
| Montana decided to go to KC. KC now needs to make an acceptable offer
to SF. SF is now saying that because of the "special relationship" with
Montana they will try to accede to his wishes; but they need to do what
is best for SF in terms of making a deal.
The Crazy Met
|
9.372 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Will u b there when I feed the tree... | Tue Apr 20 1993 10:28 | 7 |
| McDonough was on EeeeeeeeeeEeeeeeeeeeIiiiiiiiii thised morning.
Guess SF wants to trade him to Phoenix for the #20 pick.
They then want to package the #20, their 1st number pick, a 2nd and
a 3rd to NE for NE's number 1. Could be interesting...
|
9.373 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | If you see Kay | Tue Apr 20 1993 11:48 | 1 |
| This saga is getting as ridiculous as the Reggie ordeal.
|
9.374 | | METSNY::francus | ABP | Tue Apr 20 1993 11:48 | 6 |
|
Would NE go for a deal like that?? by the time they get to pick the
top QB, RB, LB, DE will be gone. Now with free agency these kind of deals
will probably become less and less common.
The Crazy Met
|
9.375 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Will u b there when I feed the tree... | Tue Apr 20 1993 15:29 | 7 |
| They need more than a single player... they need depth...
Dale Arnold was blasting Montana for being selfish about this. Wanting
to pick a team and not looking out for the best interest of the 49ers.
Gee, if I were getting traded, I wouldn't exactly be concerned about
that. Was he saying the same thing when Irving headed to Miami?
|
9.376 | Didn't he give Irving's move an SO? | CNTROL::CHILDS | U think u're something special? Think Again! | Tue Apr 20 1993 15:33 | 0 |
9.377 | Montana's act has become boring; move him out... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Apr 20 1993 15:48 | 16 |
|
> Dale Arnold was blasting Montana for being selfish about this. Wanting
> to pick a team and not looking out for the best interest of the 49ers.
> Gee, if I were getting traded, I wouldn't exactly be concerned about
> that. Was he saying the same thing when Irving headed to Miami?
Sure, but Irving Fryar wasn't saying that $3M/year, the starter's
job and godlike status within the community was "too little too late",
coming off two years of inactivity where your replacement just won
the MVP award. Basically, Kansas City's putting up bigger bucks so
Joe's throwing up a smokescreen about his treatment. I think Joe's act
with regard to Steve Young all along has been worthy of the Wade Boggs
Team Play Award. Amazing what kind of forgiveness winning will bring...
glenn
|
9.379 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Twas a HUGE Texas Barbecue | Wed Apr 21 1993 00:13 | 4 |
| Joe Montana was traded to the KC Chiefs tonite.
JaKe
|
9.380 | USA Today - Tuesday on Montana-49ers | AKOCOA::BREEN | In the land of the blind the one-eyed reign | Wed Apr 21 1993 10:47 | 15 |
| USA Today had an article basically stating that Joe saved 49ers
embarassment by taking KC job. Essentially, 49ers were having PR
problems in their shabby treatment of Joe but Joe behaved with class by
solving the dilemma and saving face for De B etal.
I essentially agreed with the article.
My opine is that athletes should be able to compete fairly for a job.
I cannot fathom the EEI position on this (along with many, many
others). If players must have some restrictions on free movement for
the good of a sport then owners have an ethical responsibility to the
individual players to not hinder the players career as major league
baseball did for so many years.
Bill
|
9.381 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ComeToMiami-AndGiveUsYourMoney! | Wed Apr 21 1993 13:31 | 6 |
| Pats need an impact player on either side of the ball. They
should go get one now. Trading down will only be more evidence
that they're fixing up the balance sheet to either sell or move
the team.
/Don
|
9.382 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | If you see Kay | Wed Apr 21 1993 18:24 | 15 |
| So do you think Steve Young will be happy with 9'rs? He was
back-up, then starter, then back-up as of last sunday, and now he is
the starter again. That was 1 class act of
ownership/managment/coaching that happened out in Frisco this past week.
Montana will help the Chiefs, but not to the extent of what he did
in 49'r land. He will not have the offensive line that he did, and
one more somewhat of a major injury will do him in, and the chiefs
aren't the best pass blockers around, and I think they lost 1-2
starting OL to FA.
Montana will probably be a thorn in Denvers side depending on Denvers
DL.
Tim
|
9.383 | | FRETZ::HEISER | break this ball and chain | Mon Apr 26 1993 14:12 | 7 |
| The Cards were rated to have had an uncharacteristically good draft
day. I think getting rid of that headcase JJ was a plus. He only
plays when he feels like it.
On the other hand, signing Beurlein for megabucks when they could've
had him for a song (2nd round pick) last summer just leaves you shaking
your head.
|
9.384 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel, but no Intel inside | Tue Apr 27 1993 15:32 | 18 |
|
I also think dealing JJ for the pick was a good idea. If Hearst is the
franchise player everyone seems to think he is, JJ would have no PT
anyway, and would be gone at the end of the year (he'll be a FA). They
also made to very good pickups on the OL, that should help them down
the line.
Waiting for Beurlein is OK. They got him for nothing but $. Had they
made the deal last year, they would have lost a draft pick AND he still
would have been a FA this year.
If they only had kept MacDonald, I'd be very excited. I think they'll
make a couple more FA moves for DB's. RB is probably the biggest
impact position for a rookie to come in and do well, and it seems that
the Cards may have gotten one of the top RB's out of college in the
last 5-6 years. Hopefully he can help turn things around.
brews
|
9.385 | Brews is seeing Red | FRETZ::HEISER | the sun was setting in Avalon | Tue Apr 27 1993 16:54 | 9 |
| Brews, thanks for the info. You obviously were aware of some things I
wasn't. You must be excited since you're a fan, are you going to start
a Cards topic?
If they only kept McDonald, we'd be looking at some exciting potential.
Just when I thought they should sell Colangelo the team, they go and
pull some decent moves.
Mike
|
9.386 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel, but no Intel inside | Tue Apr 27 1993 17:27 | 13 |
|
A Cards fan, hmmmm, not sure. Especially since they beat the Sox in
'67. OH, those Cards. Actually, I'm pleased to see them make some
smart moves, starting by getting rid of George Boone, who was head of
personel. Ackels seems to be making some good moves so far (except for
MacDonald).
I'll still be a Giants fan first, though. I still cheered for them
over the niners, who won 3 sb's in the 7 years I lived there, so I
don't see that changing. I like to see the local team do well, as it
makes going to the games more fun.
brews
|
9.387 | ok Doc, er Brews | FRETZ::HEISER | the sun was setting in Avalon | Tue Apr 27 1993 18:23 | 0 |
9.388 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Fri Apr 30 1993 07:59 | 10 |
| I guess the NFL will soon announce that New Hampshire will not be
eligible for any future Super Bowls, as it's legislature rejected a
bill which would have changed the name of the state's Civil Rights Day
to MLK Day.
No such announcement is expected from ML Baseball, nor the NBA or NHL,
but don't plan on seeing any of these leagues put their championship
games in the Granite State in the near future, either.
Lee
|
9.389 | | MKFSA::LONG | If you get there before I do | Fri Apr 30 1993 10:23 | 4 |
| Ah, there goes our chances for an NFL team!
billl
|
9.390 | | SALEM::DODA | Sniff, fish for dinner last night? | Fri Apr 30 1993 10:49 | 3 |
| Any word on when professional fottball will be coming to Mass?
daryll
|
9.391 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Mon May 03 1993 07:55 | 4 |
| Daryll, is fottball anything like football? Sounds like a German sport
to me.
Lee
|
9.392 | | SALEM::DODA | Sniff, fish for dinner last night? | Tue May 04 1993 15:03 | 7 |
| Lee,
My mistake, what I really meant to say is "You're a weenie".
Hope this clears this up for ewe.
daryll
|
9.393 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Thu May 06 1993 08:05 | 3 |
| Hey Daryll, what do you do with a weenie? :*)
Lee
|
9.394 | strange situation | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Fri May 07 1993 17:52 | 5 |
| Timm Rosenbach failed to show for mini-camp and hasn't been heard from
since the end of last season. The Cards may announce he has retired.
He changed his unlisted number, hasn't returned letters from the team,
and his agent doesn't seem to know much either.
|
9.395 | | DECWET::METZGER | Imagine your logo here. | Fri May 07 1993 17:54 | 5 |
|
What was his injury last year? Did he hurt a hip or something?
Metz
|
9.396 | Cards may make some noise with their solid draft | FRETZ::HEISER | raise your voice in shouts of joy | Fri May 07 1993 17:59 | 9 |
| No, he separated his shoulder and missed 4 games. Chris Chandler did
so well, Timm couldn't win his starting job back. Now they signed
Beurlein and still have Tony Sacca (Penn St.) on the bench. They don't
really need Timm anymore.
Interestingly enough, both Chandler and Beurlein have stated they will
be the #1 QB in the fall. Should provide an interesting training camp.
Mike
|
9.397 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Inside Intel, but no Intel inside | Mon May 10 1993 12:48 | 6 |
|
Timm got hit in the head and lost his cajones. He announced his
retirement, giving up 2 yrs of guaranteed salary ($2mil, but whose
counting?).
brews
|
9.398 | Eagles schedule | AIMHI::CORRIGAN | | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:04 | 6 |
|
Is there a note for the 1993-94 NFL schedule? Specifically the Eagles.
Thanks
Joe
|
9.399 | | RUGBY1::way | The sloop is pointing north | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:37 | 5 |
| No. Usually, when someone finds it, they post it in this topic, so this
is the one to watch.
'Saw
|
9.400 | | AIMHI::CORRIGAN | | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:40 | 2 |
|
Thanx
|
9.401 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jun 07 1993 13:43 | 1 |
| You can also check the AMERICAN_FOOTBALL conference.
|
9.402 | crazy place to look!! | AIMHI::CORRIGAN | | Mon Jun 07 1993 14:13 | 8 |
|
re. -1
Found it. Perfect.
Thanx
Joe
|
9.403 | Banks signs with Redskins.... | CAMONE::WAY | Ye can nae dispute tha' | Tue Jun 15 1993 10:35 | 69 |
| From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.virginia+dc,clari.local.new_jersey,clari.sports.top
Subject: Banks signs with Redskins
Keywords: football, men's professional
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
X-Supersedes: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 93 17:32:09 PDT
Location: district of columbia, virginia, new jersey
ACategory: sports
Slugword: fbn-banks
Priority: major
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 534/545; Id: z6264; Sel: xxsfp; Adate: 6-14-825ped; Ver: 0/1; V: sked
Approved: [email protected]
Codes: ysfprxx., &sfprdc., &sfprva., &sfprnj.
Lines: 51
ASHBURN, Va. (UPI) -- The Washington Redskins, delivering a blow to
their NFC East rival New York Giants, have signed free agent outside
linebacker Carl Banks, Redskins General Manager Charley Casserly
announced Monday.
``In Carl Banks, we think we have acquired one of the premier outside
linebackers in the National Football League,'' Casserly said. ``Carl has
always presented us problems since he joined the Giants, and we're glad
to have him on our side with the Redskins.''
Giants Coach Dan Reeves admitted that if he had to watch Banks leave
the division if he had to leave the Giants after nine years, he would
have rather seen him leave the division.
``Selfishly, I would have liked to have seen him explore 27 other
teams and not leave the New York Giants,'' Reeves said. ``Realistically,
with talent like that, there was a chance someone would make an offer
like that. I'm happy for Carl and sad that he won't finish his career
with the New York Giants.''
Casserly has to be relieved that he has some insurance in the event
Wilbur Marshall leaves the Redskins. Disgruntled from the start at the
new free agency system, Marshall objected to being Washington's
franchise player which keeps him from becoming an unrestricted free
agent. The Redskins tried to deal him to Houston but the Oilers' balked
at Washington's demands. Should a trade still go through, Banks provides
a replacement.
Banks, 31, had been named as a transition player by the Giants,
reserving their right to match any offer he received but the club
recently dropped that designation and signed inside linebacker Michael
Brooks from the Denver Broncos. Banks became an unrestricted free agent
as a result of the Giants' move.
Reeves said the addition of Brooks did not make Banks expendable.
``I don't think you take a Pro Bowl inside linebacker and put him
outside, especially having had Michael earlier in his career and putting
him inside,'' said the former Denver coach who moved Brooks as a Bronco
from the outside.
``We had to make the decision if we were going to keep Carl as a
transition player,'' Reeves put the decision in terms of dollars. ``Now
we've got to find somebody who's going to replace Carl Banks.''
Corey Miller and Kanavis McGhee are the likely candidates among the
returning Giants but Reeves said he won't look for an answer until
training camp. The Giants currently are holding a mini-camp. Reeves did
not rule out another inside linebacker moving outside.
New York also had signed free agent Carlton Bailey, who was an inside
linebacker with Buffalo. Giants star outside linebacker Lawrence Taylor
recently re-signed with the club.
Banks, 6-foot-4 and 235 pounds, was selected by the Giants with the
third overall pick of the 1984 draft out of Michigan State. He played on
two Super Bowl championship teams in New York and earned a Pro Bowl
berth following the 1987 season. In 1987, he recorded a career-high nine
sacks. He has recorded 36 sacks in his 10-year career.
Banks is the Redskins' fifth free agent signing, joining wide
receiver Tim McGee, defensive lineman Al Noga, linebacker Rick Graf and
tight end Jim Riggs.
|
9.404 | | CAMONE::WAY | I got a stiffie | Wed Jun 30 1993 10:33 | 17 |
| There is supposed to be a news conference this morning in Hartford.
Lowell Weicker is supposed to announce plans to build a domed stadium
somewhere in Central Ct (either Hartford's South Meadows, or east of the
river) and to actively pursue getting the Patriots here.
The one thing I know about Weicker is that he wouldn't announce this
unless lots of groundwork had been covered.
If I hear anything more I'll let you know....
'Saw
PS they also plan on having UCONN play there, moving up to Div I and into
the Big East football conference....
|
9.405 | topic missed by downtime or everybody goo gaa over Baseball? | CNTROL::CHILDS | they ought to let em wear dresses | Tue Jul 13 1993 12:03 | 9 |
|
What's next in football? You think they'll just let the QB raise their
hands next to avoid a sack????
dam owners are ruining the game to protect their investments...
IMO the new grounding rule SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11
mike
|
9.406 | bad rule | HBAHBA::HAAS | Lower Melvin | Tue Jul 13 1993 12:08 | 9 |
| I'm witcha on the new grounding rule. It blows.
In terms of helping the refs, it makes it a little easier. There's less
of a judgement now so long as the ball goes past the line of scrimmage,
as I understand it.
Hail, they might as well do away with the whole thang.
TTom
|
9.407 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR1-4/E13 237-2468 | Tue Jul 13 1993 12:09 | 5 |
| Ok, I'll bite.
What's the new grounding rule?
Mike
|
9.408 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Tue Jul 13 1993 12:20 | 21 |
| Mike -
I don't have it all, but the new Quarterback rules are such:
1.) To avoid a sack, a quarterback can:
a. Throw the ball away at any time. Defender caint hit him or they
get penalized.
b. QB can yell "Ollie,Ollie, Ollie-in-free" and can't be touched.
c. Defender can only hit the QB after asking "May I"
d. QB's can wear red 'magic' slippers, and when rushed, can click
them three times and chant "There's no place like home". When they
do this, they are transported out of harms way, and a little dog
bites the defenders kneecaps
JD
|
9.409 | as I read it | CNTROL::CHILDS | they ought to let em wear dresses | Tue Jul 13 1993 12:24 | 6 |
|
The rule is: That if the QB is out of the pocket, he may at anytime throw
the ball past the line of scrimmage to avoid a sack.......I'm sure though
that pocket passer will be allowed the sam latitude as the scramblers...
mike
|
9.410 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Imus is coming to Boston | Tue Jul 13 1993 12:50 | 4 |
| Gee, if they had this rule years ago Eason would still be in the
league.
/Don
|
9.411 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Tue Jul 13 1993 13:22 | 3 |
| So would Johnny Unitas, and probably Otto Graham.
Lee
|
9.412 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Allison: The Kennedy of racing? | Tue Jul 13 1993 13:45 | 2 |
| If we had that rule, Doc might, nah, he'd still be the same QB...
|
9.413 | Add Joe "Willie" Namath too! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Jul 13 1993 14:02 | 1 |
|
|
9.414 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Tue Jul 13 1993 14:07 | 3 |
| Joe Willie Namath? Most overratedQB ever!!!
JD
|
9.415 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Allison: The Kennedys of racing? | Tue Jul 13 1993 14:15 | 2 |
| No, that's Bubby Brister...
|
9.416 | They never called it same way twice anyway | AKOCOA::BREEN | Redsox fever? Take 2 aspirin | Tue Jul 13 1993 14:28 | 18 |
| It seems that rule (Int. grounding) was the most difficult to call with
the most different interpretations depending on ref, qb, teams,
cities... Even instant replay didn't seem to help because rule was
simple but called for a judgement which was colored by precedent in the
eyes of the ref or announcer, whatever.
This is similar to the legalization of holding a few years back.
And thru it all the defenses manage to prevail.
Joe Willie doesn't come to mind as overrated. I would look at qbs on
excellent teams such as 60s balt.,gb;pitt,dallas. Jim Kelley strikes
me as most overrated right now.
but then again I was always a Grogan fan and have the poetry to prove
it
Bill
|
9.417 | | USCTR1::KING | Key West, where the fun begins....... | Tue Jul 13 1993 14:31 | 5 |
| Bradshaw was the most overated, no brainer position... And he proved it.
If he didn't have stalworth and Swan making he wild throws into
completions then we would have never heard of him...
REK
|
9.418 | a vote for Fran | HBAHBA::HAAS | Lower Melvin | Tue Jul 13 1993 14:36 | 8 |
| Bradshaw, along with the others mentioned, cain't hold a candle to Fran
Tarkenton. Never has someone done less with more than his efforts with
the Vikings teams. One thing you could count on was that his stats would
be good regardless of outcome.
Kelly has to be way up there on the list of actives, however.
TTom
|
9.419 | Remember Tark with NY (football) Giants? | AKOCOA::BREEN | Contre nous Toronto et les Yankees | Tue Jul 13 1993 14:48 | 10 |
| I remember seeing Tarkenton in Yankee Stadium with the pitiful remnants
of the Giants in '67 courtesy of my cousin Joe Gergen, then with UPI.
I had migrated south to Jersey prior to service and walked into work
one monday morning into a giants discussion only to blurt
"Gee, didn't know you folks liked football. Was looking for someone to
sit with me on 50 yesterday and had to take my little sister"
Those were hot tickets in those days and tark was amazing
|
9.420 | never said that word in my note fella! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:07 | 18 |
|
Joe Willie OVERRATED?????
Overrated???? *I* didn't mention anything at all about his rating, I
was simply commenting that with this new girly-mon rule, IMO he would
have been able to play a little bit longer. You JD, sir, are once
again demonstrating your uncanny propensity for reading into things
which don't exist!
You probably still think that Lazzie (sp) Viren was a honest - above
board runner too!
[isfh]
I remain,
wondering why anybody would migrate *TO* noo Joisey too!
Kev
|
9.421 | Bottom line... Bradshaw won | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:09 | 10 |
| C'mon REK, git a grip willya!
So the Steelers basically won 4 Supes despite Bradshaw. Tho not the
mosted gifted and sometimes he looked awful, the man came through in
the clutch more often than not. He was a winner plain and simple.
How 'bout dat pass in the Supe agin the 'Boys when he got knocked out.
The main was a winner.
MikeL
|
9.422 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:12 | 4 |
| MikeL from your defense we could have mistaken Bradshaw as an ND
alum.
The Crazy Met
|
9.423 | as usual the ND hype machine came through... | CNTROL::CHILDS | they ought to let em wear dresses | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:19 | 7 |
|
Considering that Bradshaw knocked ND alumi Terry Hanratty to the bench I think
that was awfully generous of Mike.....
of course if Hanratty had gone to Pookepsie U. he'd have never been drafted...
;^)
|
9.424 | | DECWET::METZGER | Hiking in Glacier National Park. | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:19 | 17 |
|
Overrated are 1 year wonders like Doug Williams, Timmy Smith and Jay schroeder.
Overrated are Qb's like Bubby Brister who perform well in 1 playoff game.
Overrated are players like Willie Gault who have speed but can never seem to
catch the ball.
Overrated are college players who've never shown anything in the pros like the
Rocket and still get big press and big money.
Overrated are players like Brian Bozworth and that goof from the packers that
use publicity and steroids in college and don't amount to squat in the pros.
Overrated players choke in the big game more than once(john elway, Jim Kelley,
Fran Tarkenton)
Overrated players don't set new league records (Joe Namath) or Win 4 super
bowls (terry bradshaw).
|
9.425 | | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:28 | 16 |
|
Hanratty was a damn good college QB period. However I do remember him
spelling Bradshaw on occasion and playing well. Twas a good relief
pitcher.
Now the Rocket was/is and always shall be a dynamite returner and
mediocre receiver. To tell you da troof, I always thought Rocket
served ND best as a TB in the full house backfield. He could
hit the holes and was hard to bring down He could handle the short
swing pass easily. I dunno, I thought he was most dangerous in that
position. On occasion he could break ya playing flanker, but the man
could not run a decent pass pattern besides the fly.
Has anyone seen any Argo games where the Rocket played TB??
MikeL
|
9.426 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:36 | 10 |
|
> Hanratty was a damn good college QB period. However I do remember him
> spelling Bradshaw on occasion and playing well. Twas a good relief
> pitcher.
Terry Hanratty was/is a Pittsburgh legend. You won't hear real
Pittsburghers speaking poorly of ol' Terry Hanratty, nosirree...
glenn
|
9.427 | Argo Games? When they being held? ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Megabucks Winner Wannabee | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:53 | 17 |
|
>>Has anyone seen any Argo games........
I thought Argo was a cornstarch used to thicken gravy. Is the Argo
Games some sort of food fight, complete with clouds of cornstarch
smoke?
Can you make a rocket out of cornstarch? Will it fly? I know you can
fill a rocket with water, pump it up and it will fly but cornstarch is
a new one to me.
Wow! The things you learn about here in sprots....
I remain,
familiar in the ways of the chef's
Kev
|
9.428 | ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | they ought to let em wear dresses | Tue Jul 13 1993 15:57 | 6 |
|
ain't from Pittsburg and I agree that he was a good relief pitcher but a
chance to slam ND mustn't be overlooked....
mike
|
9.429 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Jul 13 1993 16:13 | 6 |
| I take issue with all of those who said that Bubby Brister was overrated.
Bubbles was so bad that he never even showed up on any rated list, let alone
close to the top.
Keith
|
9.430 | | GENRAL::WADE | I just wanna bang on these drums all day | Tue Jul 13 1993 16:26 | 5 |
|
Yes he did. He was ranked #1 in number of times a player's
parents were shown to the TV audience.
Claybone
|
9.431 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Allison: The Kennedys of racing? | Tue Jul 13 1993 23:24 | 3 |
| Williams played well in more than one year. He played really well for
years in TB...
|
9.432 | | HBAHBA::HAAS | Lower Melvin | Wed Jul 14 1993 10:47 | 2 |
| The transition or lack therein from college to pro really isn't much of
a_indicator of overratism.
|
9.433 | And Joe gets all the credit | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 15 1993 10:40 | 2 |
| A point often overlooked in the Jets' improbable Super Bowl victory is
that one of their backs rushed for 125 yards in that game.
|
9.434 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Thu Jul 15 1993 11:06 | 11 |
| Mac -
That Super Bowl belongs to Matt Snell (the REAL MVP), Jim "3 FG's" Turner, and
the defense, which shut down the Colts offense. Namath was a sidelight during
the game - his best play being handing the ball off. Hype, big hype, abouit
Joe's "prediction" makes folks think he was the star of the game.
His prediction is overrated also. What was he going to say "Yeah, we are going
to get killed by the Colts, I predict they will blow us out..."
JD
|
9.435 | Byars a Dolphin | CSC32::J_HENSON | Faster than a speeding ticket | Thu Jul 15 1993 11:07 | 1 |
| Keith Byars is now a Miami Dolphin.
|
9.436 | Snell + o-line > Joe | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey and Melanie have a new house... | Thu Jul 15 1993 11:21 | 7 |
| re: Jets in SB III
Couldn't agree with you guys more. Matt Snell was clearly the MVP, but Joe
Willie got it for the hype. Snell was unstoppable in that game, and was
playign against one of the best d-lines in football at the time.
=Bob=
|
9.437 | Joe Willie had a spell on 'em | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Thu Jul 15 1993 11:53 | 15 |
| HAHAHAHA
c'mon boyos, Broadway HypeJoe was the MVP hainds-down. The main
blabbermoufed the Colts into sneering overconfidence and they
was beaten before the match. Supa smart outpsyching by Joe Willie.
Hail, Matt Snell?? Coulda been any one_a_the full backs in them days
that coulda run through and around that comatose Colts D. HAHAHA.
Insert Nance, Gilchrist, Hewritt Dixon, even ol' Bob Cappadonna
into that FB slot and they woulda had a field day...
Open yo' eyes boys!
MikeL
|
9.438 | OL as MVP? | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Thu Jul 15 1993 12:31 | 5 |
|
The Offensive Line probably had a little something to do with Snell
getting all those yards.
The Crazy Met
|
9.439 | Tagliabue comments on realignment | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 16 1993 12:09 | 56 |
| [email protected] articles by Jul 15, 1993:
--------
Subject: Cowboys open camp as Tagliabue talks on expansion, realignment
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 93 15:57:08 PDT
AUSTIN, Texas (UPI) -- NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue, on hand for
the opening of the Super Bowl champion Dallas Cowboys' training camp,
said Thursday the establishment of free agency clears the path for the
league to focus on expansion and realignment.
``I think expansion will be the first step,'' he said, adding that
the league has only begun to ``scratch the surface of our discussion and
evaluation'' on realignment. ``It's going to be a second step sometime
down the road.''
The NFL will make a decision on two new NFL franchises in October.
When and if there is realignment, Tagliabue said the league would not
want to ``destroy what works. Obviously the Cowboys in the NFC East
works. The entire NFC East works.''
He said the NFC East -- which consists of Dallas, Washington,
Philadelphia, the New York Giants and Phoenix -- is one of the two most
competitive divisions in the league.
``So if we're looking around to tinker, we're not going to tinker
with the NFC East,'' with the possible exception of Phoenix.
Tagliabue discussed the possiblity of a Gulf Coast division,
including Houston, New Orleans, Tampa Bay and Miami, and other
realignments that would create strong regional rivalries.
He said realignment would focus on divisions that came into being
``by accident,'' such as the AFC Central, which consists of Houston,
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati and Cleveland.
Tagliabue said the league will get into ``pretty intensive
discussions'' on realignment this fall and may make some decisions at
its annual meeting next March.
Appearing at a news conference with Cowboys' owner Jerry Jones,
Tagliabue said he came to training camp to help the Super Bowl champions
celebrate last year's achievement.
``It was one of the most extraordinary turnarounds, one of the most
extraordinary achievements in the history of league sports and sports
generally to have come from were they were four years ago to last year's
extraordinary season,'' he said. ``I'm here to celebrate, have some fun,
share some of the excitment with the entire organization.''
Quarterback Troy Aikman, the Super Bowl MVP, showed up for camp
despite a back injury he suffered while lifting weights in the off
season.
``Rehab has gone well for me, and I haven't experienced a lot of
setbacks like some people with back injuries do,'' said Aikman. ``I'm
pushing it as much as I can and trying to do as much as I can in such a
short period of time, yet at the same time trying to be careful and
watch for any signs that I may be doing to much.
Coach Jimmy Johnson said he was not concerned that his team is coming
into camp with too much confidence following last's year success.
``If they prepare themselves the way we want them prepared and if
they do the things we ask of them, I'm never concerned about a team
being over-confident,'' he said.
The Cowboys' first practice session is scheduled for 9:45 a.m.
Friday, and Texas Gov. Ann Richards said she planned to attend.
|
9.440 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Intel Inside, again! | Fri Jul 16 1993 13:51 | 6 |
|
Why tinker wif the NFC East at all? Does anyone care that Phoenix
isn't geographically in the east? Leave well enough alone.
brews, who has absolutely no ulterior motives for not wanting
realignment
|
9.441 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Fri Jul 16 1993 13:54 | 4 |
| Also the teams in the AFC Central have a healthy loathing for each other.
The rivalries there are great, why spoil it??
The Crazy Met
|
9.442 | But Phoenix has nothing to do with it | AKOCOA::BREEN | Still Sox Bandwagon ticks available | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:07 | 1 |
|
|
9.443 | And.... | AKOCOA::BREEN | Still Sox Bandwagon ticks available | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:10 | 2 |
| And how about trading Phoenix to the AFC West for Pitt who can return
to the NFC Beast.
|
9.444 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:14 | 6 |
| How bout having a girly-mon wuss division and put in all them
dumb run and lose teams like Houston, Deeetroit, etc..
And of course, keep the manly NFC East alone.
JD
|
9.445 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Intel Inside, again! | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:15 | 5 |
|
Keep Phoenix in the East. I want to be able to go to at least one
Giants game a year.
brews
|
9.446 | | MKFSB::LONG | Life's a dance, you learn as you go | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:21 | 5 |
| I'd really hate to see the Steelers not given the opportunity to
put a woopin' on the two teams from Ohio each year.
billl
|
9.447 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:26 | 3 |
| yabbut, Bill, sometimes it works the other way.
The Crazy Met
|
9.448 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:26 | 1 |
| But I thought you didn't have any ulterior motives, brews.
|
9.449 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:27 | 10 |
| Houston is the odd duck in the AFC Central. Plays in a dome. Does the Run and
Lose. Is in Texas.
Cleveland and Pitt are good old rust belt teams. Cincy is a 'tweener. Caint
decide if it wants to be a full fledged RunandShootyerselfindafoot or a
manly rust belt type team. Personally, I'd like to see Pitt and Cleveland
in with da Bears and Green Bay. Minny and Detroit play in the wuss dome
division withe seachicks, the Oilers, etc...
Jd
|
9.450 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Intel Inside, again! | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:40 | 8 |
| > But I thought you didn't have any ulterior motives, brews.
Mac, as a member of the highly esteemed salesscum fraternity, I take
acceptance, er, exception to your comment that my motives are nothing
less than pure as the driven snow (at least as pure as the snow driven
over by Jake after a couple six-packs, anyway).
brews
|
9.451 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Fri Jul 16 1993 14:45 | 4 |
| Brews, you're a wimp. You start raggin' on JaKe when he's away, lets
see you do it when JaKe is on-line.
The Crazy Met
|
9.452 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Intel Inside, again! | Fri Jul 16 1993 15:14 | 9 |
|
Where have I ragged on Jake? By calling him the bastion of taste in
this notesfile, by saying snow is pure after he has pa[i]ssed over it?
I have nothing but the utmost respect for Jake, and am quite sure that
if he thought if he needed womeone to stick up for him, you are the
last person he'd want to do it.
8^)
brews
|
9.453 | | MKFSB::LONG | Life's a dance, you learn as you go | Fri Jul 16 1993 15:55 | 4 |
| brews gets a 10 on the applause meter!
billl
|
9.454 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Yes,Calgon took her away! | Fri Jul 16 1993 16:21 | 7 |
| Domes are for sissies! Artificial turf is for girls that don't want
to get mud on their joosies! Put them all in the artificial
division!!
HTH,
Tim
|
9.455 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jul 16 1993 16:26 | 3 |
| Turf is for real men. Only wimps play on that nice soft natural stuff
where the worse thing that can happen is a grass stain. Real men play
on stuff as hard as blacktop and that can rip flesh off the bone.
|
9.456 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | RealStoriesOfTheAnimalRescueLeague | Fri Jul 16 1993 16:27 | 5 |
| Hey leave my buddy Brews alone! Him and I are the only two in here
that are main enough to stand fast against soccer and all the limp
wristed qualities that it stands for!
/Don
|
9.457 | GOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLL | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Fri Jul 16 1993 16:37 | 11 |
| Aw pshaw dere Slashere,
May Pele kick you upside the haid!
MikeL
PS.
Ever hit the old Garage (Boston Club) in da early 70's after a Pats
game at the Stadium(Harvard)?.
|
9.458 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I like mine with french fried potatoes | Fri Jul 16 1993 16:39 | 3 |
| That's the old NFC Central. The new one is leaner and meaner. We'll
see at LionsManis... JD talks about the NFC East, but the Giants are
in the girly rebuilding stage too...
|
9.459 | Perhaps a clarification is in order... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jul 16 1993 16:40 | 6 |
|
I'm pretty sure I heard JD say in another note that if they built one a
them domes for indoor sporting events near him he'd flock to it...
glenn
|
9.460 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I like mine with french fried potatoes | Fri Jul 16 1993 16:42 | 3 |
| NFL is girly compared to the real game anyway. Arena FB - the 50
yard indoor war... turf, and tackling into boards...
|
9.461 | Finally!! A year in the 'burgh wifout "Bubby Ball"! | MKFSB::LONG | Life's a dance, you learn as you go | Fri Jul 16 1993 16:48 | 5 |
| I like this! Camp has just opened, or is gettin' ready to open for
most teams, and the NFL note is jumpin' wif activity.
billl
|
9.462 | maybe they don't know how to grow grass? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Yes,Calgon took her away! | Fri Jul 16 1993 17:52 | 7 |
| Yeh and ARTIFICIAL turf ends careers sooner than REAL grass.
For re-alignment, Dallas should be in the west or south division
seeing how they aren't even close to being an east team. Same with
Atlanta being in the west.
Tim
|
9.463 | | ACESMK::FRANCUS | Mets in '93 | Fri Jul 16 1993 18:58 | 8 |
| Brews, I would never even think of trying and defend Jake, he has a way
with words that I would not even try to emulate. But 'ya really should
wait with thos statements until he gets back; but then again you
yourself mention that you are sales-scum, so I shouldn't be too
surprised.
The Crazy Met
|
9.464 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Mon Jul 19 1993 10:42 | 10 |
| No Glenn -
Don't go a twisting - I said that if Bahstan built a dome like toronto, that for
every die hard Sox fan that said they'd never go to a game in it, that 10
wannabe's would flock to the stadium.
I'd only go if they had a hotel and they let guests put on adult shows for
the fains! ;-)
JD
|
9.465 | This changes more then Tony Kukoc's Height and Weight :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jul 19 1993 14:42 | 7 |
| I thought they were going to 4 4team division's (in 3 years from now)
so why do all this re alligning now ? Are they still planning on
expanding to 32 teams in like 96 ? If so they should just add 1 exp
team to each of the 4 team divisions and then wait for the next
expansion before realigning...
MaB
|
9.466 | Only 64 teams would make the playoffs | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Take me for a little while | Mon Jul 19 1993 15:23 | 5 |
| Actually, they plan on having 96 teams by 2032.
Hope this helps,
NAZZ
|
9.467 | what about Title IX? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Lower Melvin | Mon Jul 19 1993 15:39 | 0 |
9.468 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Mon Jul 19 1993 20:24 | 9 |
|
>>And how about trading Phoenix to the AFC West for Pitt who can return
>>to the NFC Beast.
The ol' rumor mill here in the 'Burgh is that when the NFL expands, and
re-aligns, the STEELERS WILL return to the NFC.
JaKe
|
9.469 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Mon Jul 19 1993 20:27 | 18 |
|
>>I have nothing but the utmost respect for Jake, and am quite sure that
Sheeeeeeeeeit. <sniff> If someone has "respect" fer me, I must be
slipping these days.
(8^)
>>if he thought if he needed womeone to stick up for him, you are the
^^^^^^^
The question I got, what's a "womeone"???? I had a snappy response fer
it, but it'd set MtM's "set hidden" finger on fire he'd have to use it
so freakin' fast.
JaKe
|
9.470 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Tue Jul 20 1993 10:19 | 5 |
| Its news like the following that makes me miss Bob Hunt:
The Philadelphia Eagles signed QB Bubby Brister...
JD
|
9.471 | | MKFSB::LONG | Life's a dance, you learn as you go | Tue Jul 20 1993 10:30 | 7 |
| Yeah that sure was music to my ears to hear that! No place I'd
rather see that shmuck go than to one of the "Greater New Yuck
City Area" teams. The press will chew him up and spit him out,
much to the chagrin of "dear old ma".
billl
|
9.472 | | WREATH::DEVLIN | It's just time to say hor d'oevre... | Tue Jul 20 1993 10:47 | 6 |
| Bill -
Phillyis a greater New York team? The Eagles are HATED, LOATHED, DISPISED,
and did I say HATED, in New York!
JD
|
9.473 | | MKFSB::LONG | Life's a dance, you learn as you go | Tue Jul 20 1993 10:55 | 6 |
| From the point of view of a western PA bigot, Philly nothing more
than a suburb of the "Big Rotten Apple" just like all of New Joisy.
hth
billl
|
9.474 | those be fightin' words - folks have died for less | METSNY::francus | Mets in '93 | Tue Jul 20 1993 11:11 | 5 |
| Bill,
The only good thing about New Jersey is that it separates NY from Philadelphia.
The Crazy Met
|
9.475 | Colts sign Majkowski | HBAHBA::HAAS | Lower Melvin | Tue Jul 20 1993 14:20 | 9 |
| Indianopolis has signed Don Majkowski to a 1 year deal worth around $1
mil, plus or minus incentives.
The Colts sign Majkowski as insurance while Jeff George holds out. George
apparently wants out of Indianapolis and has refused to show up at camp.
The Colts have fined George $24K (@$4K per day). Jack Trudeau is
currently listed as the starting QB.
TTom
|
9.476 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Yes,Calgon took her away! | Tue Jul 20 1993 20:28 | 5 |
| I thought George had a $2-3 mil/year contract already. He hasn't
proven his worth yet. Plus, wasn't his contract for something like 11
years?
Tim
|
9.477 | Help needed | SNOFS2::THURGAR | Passion is no ordinary word | Wed Jul 21 1993 21:05 | 10 |
| Quick question.
I need documented proof that Ed "Too Tall" Jones played on the
defensive line for the Cowboys. This is to settle a bet.
Please send any photocopies to Adam Thurgar. Mail Stop SNO1-1/A2.
Many Thanks
Madge
|
9.478 | | ROYALT::ASHE | I like mine with french fried potatoes | Wed Jul 21 1993 23:13 | 2 |
| Picture of a football card good enough?
|
9.479 | overrated over payed, egomaniacs | CNTROL::CHILDS | they ought to let em wear dresses | Tue Jul 27 1993 14:43 | 4 |
|
Seems to me Jeff George and Smellway have alot in common....
mike
|
9.480 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jul 27 1993 14:52 | 3 |
| � Seems to me Jeff George and Smellway have alot in common....
Except George didn't whine about being drafted by the Colts.
|
9.481 | JD woulda loved this | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 28 1993 12:00 | 29 |
| Article 6586 of clari.sports.football:
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.pennsylvania
Subject: McMahon says Eagles owner kept Randall playing
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 93 7:34:07 EDT
Location: pennsylvania
Lines: 18
PHILADELPHIA (UPI) -- Former Philadelphia Eagle Jim McMahon says it
was team owner Norman Braman's decision to keep starting Randall
Cunningham as quarterback, a published report said Wednesday.
McMahon, who was traded to Minnesota last March after three seasons
in Philadelphia, told the Philadelphia Daily News that Braman and
Cunningham were ``tight'' and that worked in Cunningham's favor.
``It was tough because I didn't feel I should be behind him,''
McMahon said. ``But when you and the owner are tight, you're going to
play.''
McMahon told the Daily News that he was frustrated by the
organization's refusal to give him a fair shot at becoming the starting
quarterback.
``I don't have anything against (coach) Rich Kotite. He treated me
real well,'' McMahon said. ``But I knew he was not calling the shots.''
McMahon, a Super Bowl winner, said the Eagles can and will win games
but will never win the ``Big One'' as long as Cunningham is quarterback.
He said Cunningham is not smart enough in crucial situations to win the
Super Bowl.
|
9.482 | :^) | GENRAL::WADE | MyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWent | Wed Jul 28 1993 12:41 | 8 |
|
I can't wait go read MikeC and Mac's replies about how
McMahon is just whining like BBJ.
Wait a minute. Do you think they were just chain yanking?
Nah.....
Claybone
|
9.483 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jul 28 1993 12:48 | 1 |
| Nobody whines like BBJ.
|
9.484 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Wed Jul 28 1993 14:00 | 6 |
| Funny how some things, and some people, never change.
Wonder if and when McMahon will ever grow up?
Lee
|
9.485 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Thu Jul 29 1993 10:40 | 3 |
| who'se BBJ ?
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.486 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | they ought to let em wear dresses | Thu Jul 29 1993 10:47 | 14 |
|
two interpations:
Big Bad John Elway as in awful bad, or terrible player, all time intercetion
leader..
or
Big Baby John Elway who want play for Colts and BLAMS(tm) DannyBoy the
collie lover Reeves for all his problems whine whine whine...
so glad I could help
mike
|
9.487 | ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | they ought to let em wear dresses | Thu Jul 29 1993 10:48 | 2 |
|
sorry folks out of decoders today, you're on your own with the last one....
|
9.488 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 29 1993 10:54 | 1 |
| What's really scary was this time I understood you.
|
9.489 | SI lands in the toilet | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 29 1993 11:07 | 11 |
|
What's the deal with Sports Illustrated wasting precious cover space on
those two crybaby losers? SI had feature articles inside on both Mo
Vaughn and the resurgent Red Sox and Bill Parcells and the emerging
Patriots, and either story along with about 100 other possibilities
would have been preferable to BBJ calling Collie another Hitler and
Collie telling BBJ to grow up. What a waste over a complete
non-story...
glenn
|
9.490 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Jul 29 1993 12:16 | 11 |
| > What's the deal with Sports Illustrated wasting precious cover space on
> those two crybaby losers?
if (SI == National_Inquirer_of_sports)
{
sell_more_magazines;
make_more_money;
}
Keith
|
9.491 | talk about your losers..... | GENRAL::WADE | MyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWent | Thu Jul 29 1993 12:44 | 10 |
|
Yo glenn,
You don't want to read stories about a couple of losers? Why
did you enjoy the stories about the Red Sox and the Pathetriots
then? :*)
East coast bias! East coast bias!
Claybone
|
9.492 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 29 1993 12:47 | 3 |
| The Patriots have as many Super Bowl wins as the Broncos.
The Red Sox are only 1-� games out of first place.
|
9.493 | Phoenix has high hopes for the Cards this year | FRETZ::HEISER | chase the kangaroo | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:06 | 6 |
| Gary Clark has predicted the Cardinals will go 10-6 this year. He
cites their quality defense and improving offense as the main reasons.
Youth could be a problem since the team's average age is 25.
I think they won't go anywhere unless they sign Garrison Hearst
immediately.
|
9.495 | I doubt it, you dweeb | FRETZ::HEISER | prime mover | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:28 | 1 |
|
|
9.496 | | USCTR1::KING | Key West, where the fun begins....... | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:34 | 5 |
| Look out!!! The Phoenix fans are at it again... Howse come the
Phoenix fans soubd justed liked N_Dume and NS fans?
Maybe I should kased Jaked?
REKED
|
9.497 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:37 | 5 |
| � Maybe I should kased Jaked?
�
� REKED
Maybe you should trade in your keyboard?
|
9.498 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:37 | 1 |
| Damn, just when I put away my RCASO decoder ring, too!
|
9.499 | | USCTR1::KING | Key West, where the fun begins....... | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:38 | 5 |
| Thats what I get for not using decspell.....
REK
|
9.500 | | GENRAL::WADE | MyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWent | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:49 | 10 |
| > The Patriots have as many Super Bowl wins as the Broncos.
So why does glenn wanna read about them instead of
the other losers?
> The Red Sox are only 1-� games out of first place.
Losers since what? 1918?
Claybone
|
9.501 | | CAM3::WAY | The thrill of the grass... | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:53 | 14 |
| |> The Red Sox are only 1-� games out of first place.
|
| Losers since what? 1918?
The Red Sox dry spell has lasted so long it's produced an angst in the
collective consciousness of the fans. Angst makes for good literature....
The Broncos, well, teams that wear orange uniforms are not taken too
seriously in the angst department....
hth,
'Saw
|
9.502 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 29 1993 13:54 | 3 |
| � Losers since what? 1918?
Depends on definition of loser.
|
9.503 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Sometimes love just ain't enough | Thu Jul 29 1993 14:00 | 1 |
| How many Super Bowls, I mean World Series have they won since 19**?
|
9.504 | Just another line on Elway's impressive resume, I suppoose | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jul 29 1993 14:06 | 13 |
|
>> The Patriots have as many Super Bowl wins as the Broncos.
>
> So why does glenn wanna read about them instead of
> the other losers?
Because what they put on the cover was hardly even sports-related. It
was a couple of supposed grown men, fitted with bibs and bonnets,
slinging applesauce and strained apricots at each other from their
highchairs...
glenn
|
9.505 | Yes, its getting closer to opening day! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Yes,Calgon took her away! | Thu Jul 29 1993 14:16 | 18 |
| The emerging Patriothetics? I guess that means they are going for
2 wins this year!?!?!?!?
The Donks own the lowsy pats team. Have the pats beat them in the
last decade?
I agree making cover on SI says SI wants more $$$ 'cause people will
read soap opera sports before other stuff.
MikeC, you act like Elway is the only/biggest whiner. Jeff George
Barry Foster, Pepper Johnson, & etc... Pepper is afraid of moving so
he sits. Barry wants Thurmal $$$ that he hasn't proven he deserves.
Same goes for George. If he played good this season then maybe. Isn't
George already making around $2.5mil/year? Elway has never held out of
camp. He sticks to his contract. That does show more class than these
others!
Tim
|
9.506 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jul 29 1993 14:47 | 12 |
| � The Donks own the lowsy pats team. Have the pats beat them in the
� last decade?
Probably not, but the Donks always seem to have the home field when
these 2 meet.
�Elway has never held out of
� camp. He sticks to his contract.
Did the Colts trade him before they opened camp? Remember, he wasn't
even going to sign a contract if the Colts didn't trade him. He was
gonna play baseball.
|
9.507 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Yes,Calgon took her away! | Thu Jul 29 1993 14:52 | 11 |
| re-1
Don't know if he was traded before camp. I was living is Phoenix at
the time, so good sports reporting wasn't there;-)
As to home field, agreed with the exception of 2 years ago. Even
road games says odds are the pats should eventually win.
The donks play the browns on the road again, but they win there.
Tim
|
9.508 | I won't forgit!! 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | McSorley,McFilthy,McNasty | Thu Jul 29 1993 15:05 | 6 |
| Yo,
I hope I can quote .489 and .490 when SI publishes "Under the tarnished
Dome" Quel garbage
MikeL
|
9.509 | | GENRAL::WADE | MyGetUpAndGoMustaGotUpAndWent | Thu Jul 29 1993 16:29 | 8 |
|
Mac,
In this file, loser is anybody who hasn't won the whole enchilada
in the last decade. I don't agree with that. What do I know.
I'm a Bronco fan. :*)
Claybone
|
9.510 | | FRETZ::HEISER | prime mover | Thu Jul 29 1993 16:37 | 2 |
| The decoder rings are safe. Last I checked, there were no Cardinal
fans in here.
|
9.512 | My Wife loves there logo ???? | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Jul 29 1993 16:56 | 4 |
| Well next to the boys there my favorite team in that division :-)
If Garrison Hurst can do 1/2 of what they want, phoenix could be
an exciting team to watch....
mab
|
9.513 | already have tickets for the Pats visit | FRETZ::HEISER | prime mover | Thu Jul 29 1993 22:55 | 2 |
| I said last year they were an improving team. They had some tough
losses. I think they'll win 8 or 9 if Hearst is in the backfield.
|
9.514 | Bear_down_Chicago_Bears_da_da... | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Jul 30 1993 13:29 | 3 |
| Looks like I got two more years till I'm at loser status...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.515 | should've gave him 15 for Unsportsmanlike | CNTROL::CHILDS | How'd you get so Rude and Reckless? | Fri Jul 30 1993 16:15 | 17 |
|
What's to holdout for Tim when Blowland throws money at Elway like
he was some kind of Gawd. I recall Blowland ripping up Smellway's
contract and paying him 2 million a year which he hasn't come
close to earning over his entire career never mind just a year....
With the limited amount of years most RB's play I can't blam Foster
for going for it all now. He was the Franchise last year....
Sure Tim others whine and pout but nobody does it better than BBJ....
My fondest memory of the looser will be getting sacked in the endzone
against the Giants in the Superbowl or watching him spike a ball and
whine cause a ref spoted the ball on the 1/2 yard line insteading
of giving the baby a TD...
mike
|
9.516 | how the mighty have fallen | FRETZ::HEISER | beat them until morale improves | Tue Aug 10 1993 12:54 | 1 |
| I can't believe the Bengals waived Fulcher.
|
9.517 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Aug 10 1993 16:19 | 3 |
| I hope the Bears are all over the guy...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.518 | | FRETZ::HEISER | beat them until morale improves | Tue Aug 10 1993 19:03 | 6 |
| The Bears (along with many other teams) have had some great ex-Sun
Devil defensive players. Fulcher would fit right in.
BTW - for you rotis players keeping score: As of right now, it appears
Steve Beurlein will be the new starting QB for Phoenix. Hearst still
isn't signed. Neither is Massey and Eric Hill.
|
9.519 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | squished tomatoes | Thu Aug 12 1993 21:46 | 6 |
|
Hearst may sign with the Cards this weekend, they are getting close.
Fulcher will be in Phoenix on Monday. Given that Massey iss still not
in camp, I'd expect the Cards to sign him.
brews
|
9.520 | | FRETZ::HEISER | beat them until morale improves | Mon Aug 16 1993 13:35 | 2 |
| I still haven't heard anything about them signing Hearst. They PO'd
Hill and Massey though.
|
9.521 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | squished tomatoes | Tue Aug 17 1993 18:16 | 5 |
| Saw that Michael Carter has told the Iggles that he is going to
retire, which was a surprise to them. With the loss of White, they
could be in big trouble onm the front line.
brews
|
9.522 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Fri Aug 20 1993 13:28 | 5 |
| The Redskins have made a trade wif the VIkings, getting QB Rich Gannon
fer a song...er I mean a draft pick.
JaKe
|
9.523 | | CAM3::WAY | Sex On The Pool Table with Heather | Tue Aug 24 1993 10:10 | 16 |
| Giants cut Stephan "The French Fry Maker" Baker yesterday.
(NOTE: I cannot take credit for the nickname -- a guy in GIANTS coined
that one)
Who won the Bears-Saints game last night. Like Dan Dierdork(tm) I too
had trouble getting used to Heyword wearing a Bears uni and Muster wearing
a Saints uni....
But I got bored and watched a re-run of "Northern Exposure".....
'Saw
|
9.525 | | CAM3::WAY | Sex On The Pool Table with Heather | Tue Aug 24 1993 11:08 | 10 |
| > Saints 20 Bears 14
Thanks, Karen....
Now I'm glad I watched "Northern Exposure"....
'Saw
|
9.526 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hey... what's going on? | Tue Aug 24 1993 12:19 | 1 |
| Bears throw a hail mary on the last play and get tackled at the 4...
|
9.527 | Mary was tackled on the 4? | OUTSRC::HEISER | slow burn | Tue Aug 24 1993 14:04 | 1 |
9.528 | | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Mon Aug 30 1993 12:53 | 9 |
|
If I was Emitt, I'd holdout. Here's the top 4 salaries in the league..
1. Steve Young 5.35 mil
2. Smellway 4.775 mil Blowlin(tm) is certifiable nuts...
3. Reggie White 4.25 mil
4. Dan Marino 4.20 mil
Yup if I was Emitt I'd take the year off.....
|
9.529 | $$$??? | MSBCS::COULOMBE | | Mon Aug 30 1993 13:02 | 6 |
|
How much is Emitt asking for , And What do the Cowboys think he worth.
I say he might just be worth the Cowboys Whole team.
BC.
|
9.530 | I hope he signs soon | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Aug 30 1993 13:59 | 30 |
| I think the biggest contracts were all written before the Salary Cap
with the exception of RW ? his might have been when the Cap was already
known. But GB needed someone on Defense to stop
Chicago/Detroit/TB/Minn Running Games...Altought Chicago and Minn's
Running games are a little less talented this year they still needed
someone and thats the only reason I can figure that RW got the amount
he did.
Dallas has to think about the Whole team... who's worth more Rison or
Irvin ??? Is Irvin going to expect as much or more the Rison, if Emmitt
gets 4M a year you bet your but. And what About Aikman, is he wort
more then a QB who cant win the big one (Elway/Kelly) and is he as good
as Young ???? If you give Emmitt, Aikman and Irvin what they all want
and are worth in comparison to the top people in there positions that
could be 1/3 of your overall Cap to 3 Players...
GB will more then likely be in trouble, with Sterling Sharpe, Brett
Farve and if they get a top name RB what are they going to want for
money seeing that RW gets 4+ mil a year...
I think teams have to think about the cap NOW and Dallas is doing that.
Emmitt might be bringing on more trouble then good... If all teams have
to worry about the cap for next season, if emmitt holds out how many
teams will have the 4+ Mil a year free under the cap to pay him and
will want to spend that much on 1 player ????
Well have to wait and see, I hope they can come to a compromise but I
think 4+ mil for any one player is a little steep (In any sport).
MaB
|
9.531 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Aug 30 1993 14:11 | 1 |
| I thought there was only a salary cap for rookies.
|
9.532 | O'Brien and Pinkett cut by Packers | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Mon Aug 30 1993 14:17 | 11 |
| The Green Bay Packers cut Ken O'Brien and Alan Pinkett Saturday.
This leaves a starting job clearly in John Stephens' hands, and leaves them
with only one experienced QB, Brett Farve. He will be backed up by Ty Detmer
and {mumble-mumble}, a rookie.
Unless they do the re-sign thing with O'Brien (who is no bargain), I think this
is a mistake. Detmer is the main reason the Pack lost to the Patriots a
couple of weeks ago. He looked terrible. Lousy arm and happy feet.
=Bob=
|
9.533 | let him sit I say.... | 38728::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Mon Aug 30 1993 14:26 | 16 |
|
Rookies have a salry cap this year. I believe it's 3.1 million per team
to sign as many rookies as they see fit.
Next year a team wide cap goes into effect and it's believed the cap will
be about 31 million.
Dallas has the 3 rd lowest payroll in the league and has the room. It does
have many free agents coming up next year and after that and claims that to
give Smith what he wants would jepodarize signing these guys. It's all BS
they can backload contracts etc...
the bottom line is they hope playing hardball with Emitt will send a message
to the rest of the boys....
mike
|
9.534 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Mon Aug 30 1993 15:03 | 6 |
| I agree with MAB that Dallas is taking this tough stand because of next
year's salary cap. In my mind they are doing the right thing if they
want to build a yearly contender. While Emmitt may not like it he can
always go back to school and finish his basketweaving degree.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.535 | | SALEM::DODA | Grip it, zip it and go find it | Mon Aug 30 1993 15:53 | 5 |
| According to Usenet, Barry Word a Viking.
Undisclosed draft choice, probably one of the Donks.
daryll
|
9.536 | | DECWET::METZGER | Come and play, everything's A OK. | Mon Aug 30 1993 17:09 | 12 |
|
With Okoye on the Dl this means Marty must be expecting a big season from
Harvey Williams and Marcus Allen...
I can't figure this deal out...
Mark Brunell is the 3rd string for Green Bay. While He never showed me much in
his junior season he improved a lot last year (must have been from sitting on
the bench watching Billy-Joe Hobert.) He's looked good in pre-season and will
probably surpass Detmer soon on the depth chart...
Metz
|
9.537 | Po' Hugh, first Lisa, now his job, man | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Aug 30 1993 17:13 | 7 |
|
Dallas cuts Hugh Millen
Can they re-sign him fer lower dinero if he clears waivers?
MikeL
|
9.538 | | DECWET::METZGER | Come and play, everything's A OK. | Mon Aug 30 1993 17:16 | 15 |
|
he's already promised to re-sign with the Cowboys...
I doubt they'll be much claiming off of waivers because if you claim somebody
then they have to be on your 40 man roster and that means you have to cut
another player.
After the 40 man is determined players can be resigned to fill out the 53 man
roster...
Personally I think it's stupid and confusing but this is the NFL....
What happened to Lisa?
Metz
|
9.539 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Aug 30 1993 17:27 | 14 |
|
Thanks Metz,
Lisa is on the Pats PR staff I believe and is gonna be co-hosting
a show on SC called "Sports Gals" or whatever. Methinks tis the
NE variety of SC.
Now I don't know about the Hugh-Lisa relationship, twas just trying
to git vda Slash going. Ya never know, Hugh goes to Dallas, Lisa
stays here, outta sight outta mind. Mebbe da Slash has a chance!!
8^)
MikeL
|
9.540 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Another day in the Volcamo | Mon Aug 30 1993 17:30 | 7 |
| re .538
Slight nit, if you claim somebody on waivers, they have to be put on
your 47 man roster, not 40 man as stated in .538.
JaKe
|
9.541 | No Pats rejects please!! | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Mon Aug 30 1993 18:16 | 6 |
|
Ugh! Hugh Millan one the few stupid trades JJ and Co. have made. My
Grandmother could read defense better that this clod. And I know she could
hit the out-n-up better .
Cadzilla2
|
9.542 | Couldda sworn she said it... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Aug 31 1993 10:38 | 2 |
| Hey, didn't Karen Derry say she wanted to run the King of the Hill contest
thised year?
|
9.544 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Hey... what's going on? | Wed Sep 01 1993 15:23 | 2 |
| Start setting them up Bob...
|
9.545 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready Steady Go! | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:23 | 6 |
| First we have Clinton the ultimate wishy-washy, AlanAlda, "Feel
your pain" type asking "Are you ready for some football", then we get Bon
Jovi doing the intro song for Monday Night Football! Somewhere Howard
Cosell was filling up a puke bucket. UGH!
/Don
|
9.546 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:34 | 5 |
| So whaddya think of the change to the offsides rule where the D is
given a warning and then subsequently penalized for going through the
line when someone from the offense moves.
My only question is, Why?
|
9.547 | | CAM3::WAY | The Last in Line | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:46 | 15 |
| >
> My only question is, Why?
>
Because it's the No Fun League.
We don't want anyone getting hurt. Pretty soon the QBs can wear
dresses and heels, and the O-line will be able to play in curlers....
And to be quite honest, I watched a lot of games this weekend, and this
has to be the worst opening day for the Refs that I've seen in years.
They were HORRID.
'Saw
|
9.548 | downright ugly | FRETZ::HEISER | notes from a lost civilization | Tue Sep 07 1993 17:57 | 7 |
| >And to be quite honest, I watched a lot of games this weekend, and this
>has to be the worst opening day for the Refs that I've seen in years.
>They were HORRID.
The local paper quoted the head of officials calling the Cards-Iggles
head linesman a "rookie head linesman" after missing the Herschel
fumble.
|
9.549 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Fri Sep 10 1993 10:14 | 13 |
| I promised TCM that I'd do some research on how many time the two
teams from the Super Bowl have met in the following regular season.
I did the research last night but forgot to bring the paper with me.
I'll give you a teaser to hold you over till Monday: It's only happened
3 or 4 times, and mostly, the Super Bowl champ wins the game.
I'll post the results on Monday....
'Saw
|
9.550 | One I can remember | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Sep 10 1993 11:19 | 2 |
| In 1970 the Vikings crushed the Chiefs in a reversal of the previous
years' Super Bowl.
|
9.551 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Fri Sep 10 1993 11:28 | 13 |
| >
> In 1970 the Vikings crushed the Chiefs in a reversal of the previous
> years' Super Bowl.
Yes, that's one that comes to mind.
I'll post the list on Monday, or even over the weekend if I can get my
modem working again.....
'Saw
|
9.552 | | MKFSA::LONG | All gave some, some gave all | Fri Sep 10 1993 12:32 | 4 |
| I seem to recall the Steelers playing the Rams after beating them
in '79.
billl
|
9.553 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Mon Sep 13 1993 09:46 | 7 |
| I still forgot to bring in the paper where I wrote down the stuff,
but after yesterday's game, it's happened four times all told. Twice
(Minnesota and Buffalo) the losers of the Bowl won the rematch.
I'll remember it tomorrow, I promise....
'Saw
|
9.554 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Mon Sep 13 1993 09:50 | 24 |
| A few ramblings:
o Watched the Raiders and Seattle last night. Jeff Hostetler
is doing things he never did for the Giants. He's scanning
both halves of the field and he's not pulling it down to run
right away. In fact, last night I saw him scramble to get
more room to run.
o The Patriots' new uniforms and logo sucks. The blue shirts
have got to go. Drew Bledsoe is going to be good.
o Dallas looked lost yesterday.
o Helluva tackle by one of the Buffalo running backs on an
interception by Dallas. The RB pulled the guy down, but he
wasn't to the ground so he reached up with his legs, and
scissored him down -- it looked like a WWF move.
'Saw
|
9.555 | | ROYALT::ASHE | WE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R. | Mon Sep 13 1993 10:42 | 3 |
| No, The new logo BLOWS... remember, as A&W said, there's a big
difference between the two...
|
9.556 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real mans sport is starting! | Mon Sep 13 1993 10:42 | 5 |
| The Patriots unis are ugly!! I thought the Broncos orange was
"loud" and is questionable, but blue, silver and red? They don't even
match!
Tim
|
9.557 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Mon Sep 13 1993 10:50 | 20 |
| > The Patriots unis are ugly!! I thought the Broncos orange was
> "loud" and is questionable, but blue, silver and red? They don't even
> match!
Some fan or group of fans, paid for one of those "flying signs" that gets
trailed behind an airplane.
It said
"Bring back red jersies. The new logo blows"
I couldn't agree more.
I wonder if we had a plane fly around Maynard it'd help to fix our "new
logo"...
'Saw
|
9.558 | surprised he got up | FRETZ::HEISER | notes from the lost civilization | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:39 | 4 |
| Did anyone catch the thigh-shuddering hit Chuck "Heat-Sinking-Missile"
Cecil laid on Middleton in the Cards-Skins game? Woah, looked like the
second coming of Dick Butkus out there. Helmet was flying and
everything.
|
9.559 | | ROYALT::ASHE | WE WUZ ROBBED!!! - D.R. | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:46 | 3 |
| It was a spear... should have been 15 yards... you don't hit a guy in
the chest with the top of your helmet...
|
9.560 | eliminated | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Mon Sep 13 1993 13:52 | 12 |
| It was definitely a_illegal hit with the helmet. It was aggressive but it
shoulda been flagged.
Meanwhile, the following teams have been eliminated from the Super Bowl
Derby. No one has won it having lost its first 2 games:
New England, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Seattle, Chicago, Tampa Bay,
Atlanta, and
DALLAS.
TTom
|
9.561 | | SALEM::DODA | Grip it, zip it and go find it | Mon Sep 13 1993 15:59 | 4 |
| Marino joined the 40K passing club yesterday. He's 4th on the
list with Sir Francis being #1 with 47K. Who are #2 and #3?
daryll
|
9.563 | Unitas, Fouts | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Mon Sep 13 1993 16:04 | 6 |
| 1 Fran Tarkenton
2 Johnny Unitas (or 3)
3 Dan Fouts (or 2)
4 Dan Marino
Montana should join the 40K group later this year.
|
9.564 | Marino's number's look very impressive... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Sep 13 1993 16:20 | 12 |
| 1) Fran Tarkenton 47,003
2) Dan Fouts 43,040
3) John Unitas 40,239
4) Dan Marino 40,024
Looking at these number's Marino should pass Unitas in 2 weeks, only
because he has next week off :-) and if he can average 216yrds per
game for the season he'll pass Fouts this season as well. He doesnt
look that old, how old is marino ? I wonder if Montana will play the
next 3 season (Signed a 3 year deal) and how productive he will be in
those years.
MaB
|
9.565 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTY | Mon Sep 13 1993 16:28 | 4 |
| Marino's first season was 1983. So he is probably 33 or 34.
The Crazy Met
|
9.566 | Didnt NE pass him up for Eason ..?? :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Sep 13 1993 17:04 | 3 |
| WOW, thats 4K per year ???? A couple more season like that and he
has the new record and counting...
Mike
|
9.567 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Sep 13 1993 17:12 | 3 |
| � -< Didnt NE pass him up for Eason ..?? :-) >-
Along with many other teams.
|
9.568 | ahh yes the famed 1983 QB's (0 SB wins!) | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTY | Mon Sep 13 1993 17:31 | 14 |
| In the first round that year:
Baltimore (remember them :-) picked Elway
NE picked Eason
Jets picked O'Brien
Buffalo took Kelly (signed with USFL, then ended up in Buffalo)
Miami took Marino (All AFL East teams - amazing!)
Kelly and Elway (apologies to MikeC) have been as effective as Marino
in helping their team. Eason and O'Brien each had some good years, but
nothing close to Marino.
The Crazy Met
|
9.569 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | MEts in (last in) 94 | Mon Sep 13 1993 19:21 | 7 |
| > list with Sir Francis being #1 with 47K. Who are #2 and #3?
> daryll
_SIR_ Francis? Musta been a typo. Shoulda been Sorry Frances.
brews
|
9.570 | | PARVAX::WARDLE_M | | Mon Sep 13 1993 21:53 | 3 |
| Didn't O'Brien make the yardage list?
JoJ_NOT
|
9.571 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Oh DOUBLE Woe is Me!!! | Mon Sep 13 1993 23:36 | 5 |
| At the Half, the clevescum Skidmarks are beating the 49ers, 20-13n the
sludgepond.
JaKe
|
9.573 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Oh DOUBLE Woe is Me!!! | Tue Sep 14 1993 01:07 | 9 |
|
Couple of minutes left, Skidmarks are going to beat the 49ers, er,
should I say that the 49ers beat themselves in this one. Too many
mistakes to beat even the Wissohiccon Boys Club 9 year old team.
The HALisms and Groanerisms will be unbearable in here tomorrow.
JaKe
|
9.574 | Thanks in advance | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 14 1993 09:53 | 2 |
| Anybody have the final, and a scoring breakdown if possible (FFL).
MaB
|
9.575 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 14 1993 10:18 | 25 |
| Okay, here's the information I promised TCM:
(Note: years listed are associated with the SEASON, not the date of
the Bowl)
In the season following the 1969 Super Bowl, Minnesota beat KC 27-10.
In the season following the 1976 Super Bowl, Oakland beat Minnesota 35-13.
In the season following the 1978 Super Bowl, Pittsburgh beat Dallas 14-3
In the season following the 1992 Super Bowl, Buffalo beat Dallas 13-10.
Of the four games, two champions beat the challengers in the rematch
and two challengers beat the reigning champs.
Sometime, if I'm feeling bored, I'll go back and research those regular
season games before the Bowl that previewed the Bowl (like Giants-Denver
regular season in 1986).
'Saw
|
9.576 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Tue Sep 14 1993 10:37 | 9 |
| Todd Blackledge came out of that class of 83. Of course he only
lasted 5 years or so. He played for KC.
Last nights 9'r loss was 23-13. Don't have the breakdown.
Bernie will be on IR if his OL doesn't learn to block. Vinnie won't
get them very far after that!
Tim
|
9.577 | Six quarterbacks were taken in first round in 1983 | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Reggie Lewis - R.I.P. | Tue Sep 14 1993 10:38 | 10 |
| Re. 9.568: TCM, you missed one:
1) Baltimore chose Elway with the #1 pick
2) Kansas City took Todd Blackledge with the #7 pick
3) Buffalo took Kelly with the #12 pick (around there)
4) New England took Eason with the #15 pick
5) Jets took O'Brien with the #23 (or so) pick
6) Miami took Marino with the #26 pick
NAZZ
|
9.578 | scoring | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Tue Sep 14 1993 11:50 | 21 |
| re: .574
MaB,
It went like this:
Cleveland a defensive linemand, Jones, ran in a TD
Michael Jackson caught a TD pass from Kosar
Stover kicked 3 FGs and had 2 PATs
San Fran Marc Logan ran in a TD
Cofer kicked 2 FGs and had 1 PAT
All in all, very impressive win for Cleveland. You gotta love the defense
that they've built. Having both Jerry Ball and Michael Dean Perry makes
for a long night for the offensive line. Pepper Johnson and Clay Matthews
played well also.
On Offense, I thought the Player O' the Game was Metcalf who constantly
kept SF's defense outta sync.
TTom
|
9.579 | Thanks in advance | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 14 1993 13:26 | 1 |
| anyone have Metcalf's stats ???
|
9.580 | he didn't score | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:01 | 0 |
9.581 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:13 | 17 |
| There was an "illegal hands to the face" call on Sunday in Foxboro.
I couldn't help what some of the old-timers must think of these sissy
penalties these days.
I can remember when the first thing a defensive lineman would do would
be to give his offensive counterpart a big old headslap. The guard or
tackle would return the favor by sliding his forearm hard up under the
DL's chin.
Now, you can't touch each other hardly.
Is this becoming the sissy, girly-mon, nancy-boy league or what?
'Saw
|
9.582 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:20 | 4 |
| Of course it is 'Saw. They have domes don't they? They have fake
grass!
Tim
|
9.583 | | CAM3::WAY | Hers for the taking.... | Tue Sep 14 1993 14:21 | 4 |
| > Of course it is 'Saw. They have domes don't they? They have fake
> grass!
It's a damn shame, isn't it?
|
9.584 | yup | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:02 | 1 |
|
|
9.585 | Elliot gone | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:30 | 17 |
| Article: 6851
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.texas
Subject: Cowboys release Elliott
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 93 12:29:34 PDT
IRVING, Texas (UPI) -- The Dallas Cowboys Tuesday released kicker Lin
Elliott, two days after he missed two field goal attempts in Dallas' 13-
10 loss to the Buffalo Bills.
The Cowboys were working out numerous kickers Tuesday and were
expected to announce Elliott's replacement by Wednesday.
Elliott kicked a 43-yard field goal in the second quarter of Sunday's
loss, but missed attempts of 30 and 49 yards. Elliott also missed an
extra point in Dallas' season-opening 35-16 loss to Washington.
Elliott was in his second year with the Cowboys. He converted 24-of-
35 field goal attempts and 47-of-48 extra points for 119 points last
season.
|
9.586 | | DECWET::METZGER | Good mornin' america, how are ya'? | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:36 | 12 |
|
Why doesn't san fran have the guts to do the same to Cofer?
Both the x-tra point and field goal he had blocked last night were low kicks
that were marginal at best. Plus he's been erratic for the past 2 years.
Siefert was stupid to go for the 3 last night when they had 4th and 1 deep
inside cleveland territory. I just knew that the kick would get screwed up some
how. (for those that didn;t watch the holder dropped the snap while trying to
set it up...this was 9:30 PDT so I imagine not many of you were up for it)
Metz
|
9.587 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY YANKEES:A SPORTS DYNASTY | Tue Sep 14 1993 17:44 | 4 |
| Yup I saw that play. 49'ers must have been tired by 12:30AM.
The Crazy Met
|
9.588 | Lin "Scapegoat" Elliot | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Reggie Lewis - R.I.P. | Wed Sep 15 1993 11:04 | 5 |
| Lessee if I got this right:
Jones won't pay Smith, so they fire the kicker.
Yup, makes sense to me.
|
9.589 | in the works | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Wed Sep 15 1993 12:01 | 18 |
| ESPN is reporting rumors that Johnson is having a hard time with all this
Emmitt and JJ stuff. Johnson showed his stress when h freaked out in the
press conference.
Supposedly, Johnson has been telling Jones that he should bring Emmitt
back and Jones told Johnson to but out, it wasn't his problem.
This morning they're reporting that Emmitt has dropped his dollar figure
a bit and Jones supposedly said that he now understands that the team
needs Emmitt and that he'll have to come up with a much better offer, one
that is consistent with the other top runners.
Speaking of top runners, meanwhile, the Lions are telling Barry Sanders
that they'll restructure his contract to look more like Thurman Thomas'.
Add that to the Steelers doing the same for Barry Foster and you get the
drift that Jones better up the ante or Emmitt will most likely sit.
TTom
|
9.591 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | MEts in (last in) 94 | Wed Sep 15 1993 14:15 | 2 |
|
The early open date (week after next) helps the Cowboys,
|
9.592 | | DECWET::METZGER | Good mornin' america, how are ya'? | Wed Sep 15 1993 14:35 | 13 |
|
I read today the Detriot is gong to restructure Barry sanders contract to give
him Thurman Thomas like money. It's another arrow in Emmitt's negotiating
quiver.
I still think JJ is being stupid about not giving him a decent offer and
worrying about the rest of the team later. Remember football contracts (for the
most part) aren't guarenteed so they can always ax players to get below the cap
next season.
Metz
|
9.593 | | SALEM::DODA | Grip it, zip it and go find it | Wed Sep 15 1993 14:53 | 3 |
| CNN is reporting he signed.
|
9.594 | is he eligible for Sunday? | FRETZ::HEISER | notes from the lost civilization | Wed Sep 15 1993 15:36 | 7 |
| Not surprising. Was he a holdout or will he be playing Sunday night?
This morning's news reported that Emmitt would accept a pay cut and JJ
offered to pay him Thurman Thomas-like money. A compromise was all it
took, plus Dallas being 0-2.
Mike
|
9.595 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Wed Sep 15 1993 16:24 | 5 |
| Nazz, Lin Elliott missed a key extra point during the Washington game
and missed two FG vs the Buffalo Chips. This on top of all his misses
during the preseason. This man could not make a FG to save his life.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.596 | missing too | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Wed Sep 15 1993 16:34 | 4 |
| Based on the preceding criteria, it shouldn't be too long afore Mike
Cofer gets the boot by San Fran.
TTom
|
9.597 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | No, I wanna be Frank this time! | Wed Sep 15 1993 16:55 | 11 |
| The saga continues here in the 'Burgh. Foster's agent and the STEELERS
are reportedly VEWWY, VEWWY close, but no cigar yet. Rumor has it that
they're ironing out the fine print that'll go into the contract.
After Foster signs, the STEELERS are set to make Rod Woodson the
highest paid defensive back in the NFL, reportedly having a deal worth
over $3 mil/yr. They won't finalize that until they're done with
Foster, though.
JaKe
|
9.598 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Mon Sep 20 1993 23:40 | 17 |
| At the half on MNF, Chiefs 12 Donks 0.
donks are giving a clinic in how NOT to play football. 12 Penalties in
the first half alone.
BTW, isn't it sorta stupid fer the refs to call a false start:
"False start before the snap"
I mean, how the hell can there be a false start AFTER the snap??? SO
why say, "before the snap"????
Sounds sorta dumb to me, but then, it's the NFL officials, so that
explains the dumb part.
JaKe
|
9.599 | Worthless on the road | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Put jam in my pockets, I'm toast! | Tue Sep 21 1993 00:04 | 2 |
| I figured as much. I mean the Donks can't play football on someone elses
field. Too bad, for them, all their games aren't at home in Pile it high.
|
9.600 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Put jam in my pockets, I'm toast! | Tue Sep 21 1993 00:05 | 3 |
| Let us know who finally wins this.
|
9.601 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Sep 21 1993 00:59 | 6 |
| Late in the fourth, 15-0 Chiefs, Lowery 5 FG's.
I'm outta here
JaKe
|
9.602 | The denver skunks? | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Put jam in my pockets, I'm toast! | Tue Sep 21 1993 01:39 | 1 |
| Sounds, smells like a skunk to me :-)
|
9.603 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY YANKMEES: A SPROTS DYNASTY | Tue Sep 21 1993 01:47 | 7 |
| 15-7 final.
Joe Montana has now beaten ever NFL team except Miami. Of course he did
beat Denver and Miami in the SB.
The Crazy Met
|
9.604 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | Put jam in my pockets, I'm toast! | Tue Sep 21 1993 02:51 | 1 |
| He has never beaten the niners :-)
|
9.606 | What is the network address for CAFEIN? | 38400::ERICKSON | Please walk under my tree stand.... | Tue Sep 21 1993 11:33 | 6 |
| Hello,
Can someone post the network address for CAFEIN? I can't access it anymore I get remote node
is unknown.
Ron
|
9.607 | smell the COFFEE | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Tue Sep 21 1993 11:45 | 7 |
| If'n you're looking for the ::POOL, it's on COFFEE.
COFFEE::POOL_93
COFFEE is 32.63
TTom
|
9.608 | Mack re-signed | HBAHBA::HAAS | Primus Caverns Guy | Tue Sep 21 1993 18:46 | 17 |
| Article: 6903
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.ohio
Subject: Browns re-sign Mack
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 93 14:13:43 PDT
CLEVELAND (UPI) -- Cleveland Browns running back Kevin Mack, who had
announced his retirement during training camp, Tuesday re-signed with
the club. The Browns announced earlier this month that the 31-year-old
Mack reached an understanding to return to the 53-man roster before the
end of September.
Mack had announced his retirement in July but changed his mind after
discussing it with Coach Bill Belichick. Mack, a 6-foot, 225-pounder, is
entering his ninth season out of Clemson.
He has spent his entire career in Cleveland and ran for 1,104 yards
in 1985, his rookie season. Mack gained 543 yards last season and has 5,
090 yards in his career.
|
9.609 | | USCTR1::KING | Look, I can hear what you are thinking..... | Wed Sep 22 1993 12:17 | 3 |
| Speaking of Clemson, what NFL team does Rudy Harris play for?
REK
|
9.610 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Wed Sep 29 1993 12:26 | 3 |
| Rumor mill has Ditka in Atlanta nexted year...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.611 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | MEts in (last in) 94 | Wed Sep 29 1993 13:29 | 5 |
|
There's also a rumor that he'd be here next year if Bugel gets canned.
I hope Atlanta wins out...
brews
|
9.612 | The man in black in done | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Jeff Riggen 592-5249 | Wed Sep 29 1993 13:30 | 6 |
| >> Rumor mill has Ditka in Atlanta nexted year...
>> Chip_GSH_Bach
Why wait... that falcon is basting on the rotisserrie now.
|
9.613 | Pardee shaky | HBAHBA::HAAS | Broons roolz | Wed Sep 29 1993 13:34 | 11 |
| Glanville isn't the only one on the hot seat.
Supposedly, the only reason Jack Pardee is still the coach at Houston is
that no one else is going for it. At least this is what that guy on ESPN,
Edleman (sp?) is saying. And having Buddy Ryan run his mouth and then
fielding a substandard defense ain't helping much either.
But the season is young and maybe around Thanksgiving time there be a
complete list of who's on the way out.
TTom
|
9.614 | kill 2 birds with 1 coach | FRETZ::HEISER | AWANA | Wed Sep 29 1993 13:43 | 2 |
| Brews I'd rather have Ditka here. He'd build a winner for sure and put
Bidwill in his place in the process.
|
9.615 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | MEts in (last in) 94 | Wed Sep 29 1993 14:12 | 8 |
|
Ditka won _once_ with a defense built by Buddy Ryan (look what the
Bears did after Buddy left) and over the coarse of the seven years
following the championship managed to alienate everyone else on the
team. People were expecting great things from the Bears after '85, and
what happened? One (maybe, I'm not sure) NFC Championship appearance.
boC
|
9.616 | exit | CNTROL::CHILDS | ERS, cause everybody can't play U2 | Wed Sep 29 1993 14:13 | 4 |
|
Ditka's more over-rated than Dan Reeves or any other cowpoke to come out
of Dallas for that matter. If ever a team won a superbowl inspite of their
coach the Bears were it. The man makes for great copy but that's it.
|
9.617 | Yea right | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I don't need no stinking Package! | Thu Sep 30 1993 00:16 | 1 |
| Typical Anti Dallas crap.
|
9.618 | truth hurts don't it... | CNTROL::CHILDS | That SIR is an Unmitigated Fabrication | Thu Sep 30 1993 10:46 | 0 |
9.619 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu Sep 30 1993 12:44 | 4 |
| Ditka took a terrible team and left with a great record, considering he
had a few 6 (or less) win seasons...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.620 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 04 1993 13:22 | 5 |
| The winningest franchises since the merger of the AFL and NFL:
Dolphins
Redskins
Raiders
|
9.621 | \ | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Mon Oct 04 1993 13:27 | 1 |
| So the faids aren't the winningest.
|
9.622 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Umgwana Cik Buudie | Mon Oct 04 1993 17:26 | 11 |
| Geeeeeeeez, the Bubster does a relief appearance fer Cunningham and
pulls a game out of his big butt fer the Eagles.
Jsut wait'll nexted week when, being that Bubby will be starting, he'll
send mommy some tickets and they'll be showing her every emotion
between plays.
Brister has had his obligatory 1 good game per season, so the Iggles
are headed down the chute.
JaKe
|
9.623 | | DECWET::METZGER | Owner of the scorpion petting zoo. | Mon Oct 04 1993 18:09 | 9 |
|
Philly will be scrambling for some serious Qb blood after watching bubble play
1 full game....They might even be wishing for Kemp...Ho-Ho....
Are their any decent QB's available from other teams? Will the eagles beg
Flutie to come back from the CFL to lead them to the promised land?
Metz
|
9.624 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Umgwana Cik Buudie | Tue Oct 05 1993 01:10 | 4 |
| Fish clip Skins, 17-10.
JaKe
|
9.625 | | USCTR1::KING | Look, I can hear what you are thinking..... | Tue Oct 05 1993 09:35 | 4 |
| The Eagles signed Ken Obien as a back-up QB......
REK
|
9.626 | "In Bubby we trust" | CNTROL::CHILDS | That SIR is an Unmitigated Fabrication | Tue Oct 05 1993 10:20 | 10 |
|
>> The Eagles signed Ken Obien as a back-up QB......
The only guy in the league that can make Bubby look good......
;^)
mike
|
9.627 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Tue Oct 05 1993 11:56 | 6 |
| Flutie, NFL & promised land should not be mentioned in the same note!
Maybe the Vikes will let McMahon go back to Philly? I know he and
Crandol will get along well!
Tim
|
9.628 | (tm) | 16421::HEISER | AWANA | Tue Oct 05 1993 13:38 | 2 |
| Football: the sport where strange men fight over the chance to play QB.
Losers settle for playing pattabutt.
|
9.629 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 05 1993 15:03 | 1 |
| Who is Ken Obien?
|
9.630 | Kenon? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Over the wall | Tue Oct 05 1993 15:07 | 4 |
| Didn't he used to write some of the Simpson's shows? He's rumored to be a
late night talk show host but that can't be confirmed.
TTom
|
9.631 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Tue Oct 05 1993 16:56 | 4 |
| Where's Chappy been ? Every time the Faiders lose he seems to
disappear. How about dem Raiders ?
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.632 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Oct 05 1993 16:58 | 6 |
| How 'bout them overrated ex-Irish there mikey??
Brown, Rocket, Montana...
MikeL
|
9.633 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 05 1993 17:04 | 2 |
| Chappy's busy over in the Yankee note trying to defend a Donnie "A
shadow of his former baseball self".
|
9.634 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Center wanted: Inquire with Don Chaney | Tue Oct 05 1993 18:55 | 1 |
| K-K-K-Kenny at the Vets?
|
9.635 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Tue Oct 05 1993 22:09 | 1 |
| I see Hieser geering up for more crow...
|
9.636 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Oct 12 1993 00:06 | 8 |
| At the half, Buffalo is turing out the lights on the Moon, leading 28-7
with the Oilscum giving up the ball 3 times on turnovers in the first
half.
Ain't it a shame Doc Midnight ain't here to take the heat????
JaKe
|
9.637 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Oct 12 1993 01:09 | 14 |
| Couple of minutes left, 35-7 Buffalo.
Houston had 6 turnovers in the game. Got flagged on two consecutive
plays for the defense having too many men(men used loosely) on the
field, then had to call a timeout so they could get the defense right
or they would have been flagged for too many on the field on THREE
consecutive plays.
Warren Moon's best days of his career are behind him.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
JaKe
|
9.638 | exit | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Oct 12 1993 10:00 | 5 |
| anyone have the box scores, my ffl league give's bonus pts on
things like over 100yrd's rush, rec, and QB pasing over 300yrds
The usa today only has who scored... Thanks in advance.
Mike
|
9.639 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't play dat song, dat Achybreaky song | Tue Oct 12 1993 10:44 | 2 |
| Called Doc lasted night at halftime... no answer...
|
9.640 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Tue Oct 12 1993 13:16 | 2 |
|
It's days like today that I really miss the Doc. sniff
|
9.641 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:13 | 10 |
|
>> <<< Note 9.639 by ROYALT::ASHE "Don't play dat song, dat Achybreaky song" >>>
>> Called Doc lasted night at halftime... no answer...
Ya might want to pay him a visit and make sure he ain't standing on a
chair with the rope around his neck.
JaKe
|
9.642 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't play dat song, dat Achybreaky song | Tue Oct 12 1993 18:02 | 2 |
| He'd have to stand on a chair to approach eye level..
|
9.643 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Oct 12 1993 18:07 | 3 |
| you guys are vicious!
The Crazy Met
|
9.644 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 13 1993 11:01 | 3 |
| The Falcons and the Packers have swapped running backs. The Packers
get Eric "Oops" Dickerson in exchange for John "I haven't been the same
since I put that guy in the hospital" Stephens.
|
9.645 | but wait, there's more..... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Wed Oct 13 1993 11:03 | 8 |
|
Yabbut plus, the Falcons also got 1-2 other players and (I think)
a draft pick.
I remain,
amazed anybody thinks Stephens can be any good!
Kev
|
9.646 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 13 1993 11:07 | 7 |
| Stephens was showing flashes of his former self last year for New
England. He was also becoming a force to be reckoned with as a
receiver out of the backfield. I think he could have helped the Pats
this year, especially in that capacity.
Interesting rumor going through the mill -- Moon to Miami to replace
injured Marino.
|
9.647 | | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't play dat song, dat Achybreaky song | Wed Oct 13 1993 12:17 | 2 |
| Green Bay got Pickens, the Falcons got a conditional draft pick.
|
9.648 | The show should be Moonlighting Miami | ROYALT::ASHE | Don't play dat song, dat Achybreaky song | Wed Oct 13 1993 12:18 | 1 |
| Moon over(to) Miami? Sounds like the makings for a song or TV show.
|
9.649 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Real man's sport has started! | Wed Oct 13 1993 14:03 | 4 |
| Man them oilers are looking for any 'scape goat they can find. How
about a new owner?
Tj
|
9.650 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Oct 13 1993 14:23 | 5 |
| > I think he could have helped the Pats this year
ain't nothin' that can help the POats this year.
The Crazy Met
|
9.651 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Wed Oct 13 1993 14:47 | 6 |
|
> ain't nothin' that can help the POats this year.
A few more games against the Cards certainly wouldn't hurt!
brews
|
9.652 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Oct 13 1993 15:37 | 6 |
| re: .651
And from the man who predicted a Super Bowl victory for the Cards, no less.
Brews, you ready to put in a reply in topic 50??
The Crazy Met
|
9.653 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Wed Oct 13 1993 15:43 | 6 |
|
boC made the prediction, note 132.11, I believe. boC is a different
personality than me, if'n you catch my drift. And he is no welcher on
p_name bets or crow notes, as some people might accuse TC*.
brews, or boC_not
|
9.654 | go figure | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Wed Oct 13 1993 18:05 | 2 |
| The Pats want to play the Cards 16 times, and the Cards want the 'Skins
16 times.
|
9.655 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 14 1993 12:32 | 2 |
| Warren Moon has been benched in favor of Cody Carlson for this week's
game against the Pats.
|
9.656 | John Stephens | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 15 1993 17:05 | 24 |
| Kev was wonderin' about John Stephens a few days ago. Here's some
interesting info on him. (BTW, Dickerson flunked Green Bay's physical
-- something about a bulged disk).
[email protected] articles by Oct 12-13, 93:
--------
Subject: Falcons trade Dickerson to Packers
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 93 13:35:32 PDT
ATLANTA (UPI) --
...
Stephens was a first round draft pick of New England in 1988 after
starring at Northwestern State in Louisiana and was the NFL Rookie of
the Year.
...
The 27-year-old Stephens led the Patriots in rushing for three
consecutive seasons before being traded to Green Bay in the off-season.
Stephens had seven 100-yard games with the Patriots and was leading the
Packers in rushing this season with 173 yards in five games.
|
9.657 | A Minny Soap Opera | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 15 1993 17:59 | 14 |
| I beleive Bennett is seeing all the action in GB these days, it looks
like bennett gets more carries every week and as of this week has
passed stephans in carries, but not yards. Bennett is the #2 receiver
on GB with 19 rec for 132 yrds stephans only has 5 catches all season.
Neither of them seems to have any fumbles ? For you FFL's stephans
just got his first TD, while bennett has 4, neither has seen a 100yrd
games yet this season.
Now Im a bit confused, the USA today says the Trade was voided, yet
Stephans was in a Falcons Uniform last night ? Is stephans a Falcon
or a packer ??? And for that matter where is Eric now, someone said
GB Waived him ????
MaB
|
9.658 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 15 1993 18:03 | 4 |
| Reports I've read (in the American Football Conference I think), say
that the deal was consummated (i.e. Stephens stays put), but the
Falcons and Green Bay are working something out (maybe the draft pick
isn't included) to compensate GB for Dickerson failing the physical.
|
9.659 | ouch! | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Tue Oct 19 1993 13:45 | 6 |
| Transaction of the year:
Cowboy LB John Roper fell asleep during a team meeting. Jimmy Johnson cut
him.
TTom
|
9.660 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 22 1993 12:34 | 9 |
| Good Morning America had a couple of guys on this morning to talk about
the Houston player who had his paycheck witheld for staying home with
his wife and newborn. They had a former MLB pitcher who retired from
baseball in order to spend more time with his family and one of the
guys who covers the NFL for SI. Both seemed to think the actions of
the Oilers was appropriate. They also said they respect the guy for
establishing his priorities and sticking to them.
Both of my kids were born in the off season.
|
9.661 | Millen now the 3rd string Qb | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Fri Oct 22 1993 12:46 | 8 |
|
re.658
It could have been worse. Jimmy could have traded him to the Pat's for
another useless QB.
Cadzilla2
|
9.662 | How much would you have been fined? | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Fri Oct 22 1993 14:06 | 1 |
| > Both of my kids were born in the off season.
|
9.663 | Sullivan wins round 1 vs. NFL | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 25 1993 13:41 | 12 |
| The NFL lost another court battle. Billy Sullivan, former owner of the
New England Patriots, successfully sued the NFL. His suit claimed that
the NFL forced him to sell the New England Patriots to Victor Kiam
below market value. A Boston jury agreed and awarded Sullivan $38
million which was trebled under the antitrust laws. The NFL is
naturally trying to appeal.
With his winnings, Billy can almost buy himself back into NFL. He said
he wouldn't consider it as long as Tagliabue is still commissioner,
though. Billy's lawyer thinks this case will set a precedent whereby
the cities who don't get awarded expansion franchises can sue the NFL
for turning them down.
|
9.664 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Frog Baseball Rooolz!!!! | Mon Oct 25 1993 13:54 | 5 |
| If I were old Billy I wouldn't be spending the money just yet,
because the NFL has a good chance of winning on appeal where a dummy
dozen isn't involved.
/Don
|
9.665 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:11 | 5 |
| yeah, real tough for Sullivan to win with a Boston jury. Anyway aren't the
Sullivan's still in a pile of debt - money would need to be used for that
first.
The Crazy Met
|
9.666 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Frog Baseball Rooolz!!!! | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:22 | 7 |
| Craze, as long as Alioto is the lawyer he could win in any town.
He's famous for packing juries with ninnies who'll believe his "David
versus Goliath" yarns that he spins in trials against the NFL. As I
said in a previous note the appeal will be heard by someone with a
semblance of a clue.
/Don
|
9.667 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:31 | 6 |
| who was the players lawyer in the McNeil case??
I assume an appeal goes before a 3 judge panel - or something like that -
and not a jury. right??
The Crazy Met
|
9.668 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:35 | 3 |
| Sullivan's case basically came down to him selling the Pats for $80
million while the NFL put a price tag of $140 million on an expansion
franchise. It wouldn't be too tough to sell that to any jury.
|
9.669 | The Will McDonough watch day 4 | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:36 | 4 |
| I'm anxiously awaiting his version of this think which should explain
the nfl strategy in trying to overcome this verdict. I think the
amount being reduced is the likely outcome. Billy will net 10 - 20
when done.
|
9.670 | paid for itself | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:38 | 8 |
| Actually, in the league's previous "success" on appeal, it's only been
the money that was changed. In the monopoly case where millions were
awarded, the appeal did not overturn the guilty result it just changed it
to a dollar which trebled gave the new award of 3 bucks.
Of course the money is the whole issue, ain't it.
TTom
|
9.671 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:45 | 5 |
| actually the judgment that cost them $3 was not on appeal. This was the
USFL suit against the NFL and the original jury awarded the USFL $1 which
was tripled to $3.
The Crazy Met
|
9.672 | NFL vs. the Sullivans: too bad someone had to win... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:57 | 25 |
|
> -< The Will McDonough watch day 4 >-
Yup, on these matters official NFL (NBA, NHL, MLB) house man Shill
McDonough manages to come in about 95% wrong. It's his function in
life to pass on such utter propagandist nonsense as his latest and
greatest effort of "the Celtics would have lost $3M last year had
Larry Bird played and collected his salary so there's no way that they
can afford to win a lottery pick and pay him..."
The fact is that despite some irrelevant local media bleatings on the
subject of Billy Sullivan as bumbling businessman, it really doesn't
matter how stupid he had been in the past or how many times he changed
his mind on the issue of public ownership, as long as it can be proved
that he was financially damaged by an NFL action in violation of
antitrust law. Because Sullivan had to sell at $80M and the Patriots'
franchise value is now in excess of $125M (probably closer to $150M) any
last-gasp, desperate attempt he made to keep himself afloat that was
subsequently shot down by the NFL must be taken seriously. The NFL's
double standard with regard to the 49ers' ownership (and others) is
well-documented, and no matter how much a hypocrite Sullivan is about
his motives, it looks like he had a pretty good case after all...
glenn
|
9.673 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Oct 25 1993 15:02 | 5 |
| The question also is did his last-gasp effort have a prayer of working?
Doesn't sound like anyone believes he really could have sold shares in
the Pats even in 1986.
The Crazy Met
|
9.674 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Frog Baseball Rooolz!!!! | Mon Oct 25 1993 15:58 | 8 |
| Let's not forget that Billy was trying to sell stock for a team
that was 100 million dollars in debt. The league bent over backwards by
letting him "borrow" from the player's deferred payment cache. The NFL
needs some kind of rules to prevent bankruptcy court judges from taking
over and running an NFL franchise when it gets too far into debt (like
the Patsies were).
/Don
|
9.676 | Charlotte, St. Louis | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Tue Oct 26 1993 11:23 | 19 |
| Today's the day the NFL decides who gets to pay them a couple hunder mil
for he right to join the club.
Baltimore has 2 different owner groups and is expected to compete with
St. Louis for a_old NFL city. For some reason the league seems to be
leaning strong toward St. Louis which finalized its money situation
yesterday. A little late seems early enough. Give the nod to St. Louis
who has already started building the stadium.
Charlotte is the front runner for a new NFL city. Memphis has attracted a
lot of attention with their team name, The Hound Dogs, showing the Elvis
connection. Dallas owner Jerry Jones has endorsed their efforts which
isn't news considering a business associate is part of the group.
Jacksonville started and stopped a couple of times with their drive and
suffer from being in the smallest TV market of the 5 teams and from the
fact that neither the Dolphins nor the Bucs sell out. Give the nod to
Charlotte who has already billed this noter for a Personal Seat License.
TTom
|
9.677 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Oct 26 1993 11:26 | 5 |
| Well, it could take the owners a while. Seems that a city needs 21 of 28
votes, and they are not eliminating the city with the lowest number
of votes after each round.
The Crazy Met
|
9.678 | done deal | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Tue Oct 26 1993 11:44 | 1 |
| My money is on Charlotte and St. Louis.
|
9.679 | UPI on Owners Meeting | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 26 1993 12:48 | 57 |
|
[email protected] articles by Mon, 25 Oct 1993:
--------
Subject: NFL owners to meet in Chicago to select two expansion clubs
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 16:10:05 EDT
CHICAGO (UPI) -- The National Football League's two expansion
franchises will be determined this week when club owners meet starting
Tuesday in Chicago.
Owners will select two clubs from the five finalists--Baltimore, Md.,
Charlotte, N.C., Jacksonville, Fla., Memphis, Tenn., and St. Louis, Mo.
The two new clubs will pay close to $150 million each to join the NFL
for the 1995 season and expand the league to 30 teams.
The Baltimore team would be known as either the Bombers or the
Cobras, depending on which of the two groups bidding for the expansion
franchise is selected. One of the groups is headed by billionaire
investor Malcolm Glazer. Plans are for a new 70,000-seat stadium next to
the Baltimore Orioles' hugely successful Oriole Park at Camden Yards.
The St. Louis team probably would be called the Stallions. Investors
are building a 70,000-seat domed stadium. James Orthwein, who owns the
New England Patriots, had been a partner in the bidding group but
recently reduced his role to limited partner. The head of the investment
group had been Jerry Clinton, but Clinton withdrew Monday and Greg
Kroenke has taken over the leadership of the St. Louis entry.
St. Louis is the largest television market in the United States
without an NFL team and is the home of Anheuser-Busch, a prime
advertiser for the league. There are questions, however, regarding fan
support in view of the Cardinals' move out of the city to Phoenix.
Memphis lists the estate of late rock legend Elvis Presley among its
investors and as a tribute will be called the Hound Dogs if chosen. In
addition to the Presley Estate, the investment team includes financial
heavyweights William Dunavant and Paul Tudor Jones. The main drawback
the Memphis investors need to overcome is a less-than-attractive playing
facility in the Liberty Bowl.
Jacksonville's team probably would be called the Jaguars. The
investment group is headed by J. Wayne Weaver. The group pulled out of
the running for a franchise this year and then announced that it was
back.
Jacksonville has a good facility in the 70,000-plus Gator Bowl but is
the smallest television market of the five candidates.
Charlotte's team has been called the Panthers. The chief investor is
former NFL player Jerry Richardson, who heads the highly successful
Flagstar Companies food service chain. Charlotte investors plan a 72,
000-seat stadium.
A number of NFL owners have expressed a keen interest in getting the
league into the fertile Carolinas area market and create regional
rivalries with Atlanta, the Florida clubs and Washington.
Also on the owners' agenda this week is the selection of Super Bowl
sites for the January, 1997, and January, 1998, championship games. New
Orleans, San Diego and Tampa Bay are in the running for the 1997 game
and San Diego, Tampa Bay and Los Angeles are bidding for the 1998 title
game. The four cities competing to host the Super Bowls have been the
site for 17 of the 27 Super Bowls.
The 1994 Super Bowl will be held in the Georgia Dome in Atlanta. Joe
Robbie Stadium in Miami will be the site for the 1995 game and Sun Devil
Stadium in Phoenix will host the 1996 game, Super Bowl 30.
|
9.680 | UPI on Sullivan Lawsuit vs NFL | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 26 1993 12:57 | 46 |
|
[email protected] articles by Oct 20-25, 1993:
Subject: Sullivan wins $114M from NFL and club owners
BOSTON (UPI) -- The National Football League and 21 team owners were
ordered by a federal jury to pay former New England Patriots owner
William Sullivan $114 million in damages Friday for barring him from
selling stock in the club in the 1980s.
``Thank God. Justice was done,'' said a beaming Sullivan outside the
U.S. District courtroom where the verdict was handed down.
The league immediately announced it would appeal, but Sullivan's
chief attorney, former San Francisco Mayor Joseph Alioto, predicted the
award would stand.
``Jackie Gleason said it best, 'How sweet it is!''' said Aliotto. He
said he would seek $25 million in attorneys fees for Sullivan's legal
team, in addition to the award.
Alioto also predicted the verdict would have far-reaching effects on
the league, including the granting of new franchises and salary caps on
rookie players.
``The significance of the case is that the NFL walls of monopoly will
come tumbling down,'' he said.
Sullivan claimed the league's refusal to let him sell 49 percent of
the Patriots to the public in a stock offering in 1987 forced him to
sell the team to Victor Kiam, owner of the Remington electric shaver
company, in 1988.
At the time, Sullivan was in deep financial trouble, in part because
of a failed $20 million investment by his son, Chuck, in a world concert
tour by singer Michael Jackson.
The sale would have required an exemption from league rules, but
then-Commissioner Pete Rozelle recommended against it, and a majority of
owners supported his decision.
Sullivan, who bought the team in 1959 for $25,000, sued the league
and club owners for $116 million, triple the amount he claims he lost
because of the league's action.
In addition to the Patriots, the suit exempted six teams -- the
Raiders, 49ers, Eagles, Dolphins, Giants, Chiefs -- because, Alioto said,
their owners had sued or ``stood up to'' the NFL in various ways over
the years.
``The independent owners were left out (of the suit) and the stooges
were left in,'' he said.
Alioto, who is Sullivan's son-in-law, said virtually every ruling
from the bench during the trial went in favor of the league, and said,
``There's really nothing left to appeal, believe me.''
|
9.681 | 2 new cities? | AIMHI::SMILLER | | Tue Oct 26 1993 15:01 | 5 |
|
Has anyone heard what two cities will get the new expansion teams.
steve
|
9.682 | later today, possibly | 17318::DABLER | Is it 1996 yet? | Tue Oct 26 1993 15:28 | 16 |
| RE : <<< Note 9.681 by AIMHI::SMILLER >>>
>> -< 2 new cities? >-
>> Has anyone heard what two cities will get the new expansion teams.
steve,
This will be decided later today. It's only 2:30 here in the MidWest
and the group from St. Louis isn't scheduled to present to the NFL
owners until 3:00 CDT.
hope this helps...
Jim()
|
9.683 | | QUASER::HUNTER | How Do You Spell Win... G L Y N | Tue Oct 26 1993 15:46 | 3 |
| Waiting with baited breath in colorado !!
BG
|
9.684 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Wolf, Wolf, Wolf... | Tue Oct 26 1993 16:12 | 6 |
| re.683
Want me to fax ya some Listerine?????
JaKe
|
9.685 | | QUASER::HUNTER | How Do You Spell Win... G L Y N | Tue Oct 26 1993 16:15 | 6 |
| Jake...
How ya doing... Pretty disgusted after that poor ST performance on the
part of your squeelers, aye !?!
BG
|
9.686 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Oct 26 1993 17:02 | 4 |
| � Waiting with baited breath in colorado !!
Why? Need to know what other stadium the Broncos are going to lose
regularly in?
|
9.687 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Tue Oct 26 1993 21:58 | 7 |
|
Charlotte got one of the expansion teams: Carolina Panthers.
Other one will be decided on, on November 30th.
The Crazy Met
|
9.688 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Wolf, Wolf, Wolf... | Tue Oct 26 1993 23:52 | 4 |
| --dan'l be a happy man tonight. Probably gone swimming to celebrate.
JaKe
|
9.689 | | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Wed Oct 27 1993 09:45 | 5 |
|
Now that Charlotte has a football team, when will New England
get one?
Claybone
|
9.690 | Go Panthers! Watta team! | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Wed Oct 27 1993 10:40 | 13 |
| Both Dan'l and BobHunt have bought season tickets. Actually, they bought
a Personal Seat License which gives them the right to buy season tickets.
It's with no small irony that BobHunt will get to start his fandom in
Clemson's Death Valley, the scene of near continuous carnage of his
'Hoos.
The city of Charlotte has already got it's money worth outta all this.
The party down town started with indoor fireworks, then outdoor
fireworks, then the whole party moved outside into the streets. A good
time was had by all, especially those of us who had a basketball game to
warm up with.
TTom
|
9.691 | I'm jealous | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Wed Oct 27 1993 11:12 | 1 |
| Phoenix deserves one before New England does.
|
9.692 | Generated a lot of up-front capital... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 27 1993 11:35 | 12 |
|
> Both Dan'l and BobHunt have bought season tickets. Actually, they bought
> a Personal Seat License which gives them the right to buy season tickets.
Yeah, I read where those babes went for $600-$2500 just get your foot
in the door with an option. The Charlotte group certainly capitalized
on the fanatical desire to bring the NFL there-- I don't think there's
much doubt but that the Carolina fans were the most desirous and ambitious
of all the candidates...
glenn
|
9.693 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Oct 27 1993 11:38 | 3 |
| Glenn, actually $5,000.
The Crazy Met
|
9.694 | up to >$5K and rising | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Wed Oct 27 1993 11:59 | 16 |
| There was a pretty wide range of PSL prices. The one that I'm in on costs
$2700 and that'll give me a right to buy a $600 season ticket. We're in a
fair to middlin section.
BobHunt, being the elitist that he is, and Dan'l, being the urban swimmer
that he is, bought the next range up and paid $3600 for their PSL.
Downstairs, mid field PSL went for $5400.
Now the kick in the pants will be for anyone who wants to buy a remaining
PSL. In the effort to sell the place out, the Richardsons said in no
uncertain terms that these PSL prices were like pre-construction. Those
who didn't buy them then and want them now will be paying more than those
of us who more or less bought these thangs on faith.
TTom
|
9.695 | Expand by 4 and make everybody happy | SNAX::ERICKSON | Please walk under my tree stand.... | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:00 | 8 |
|
The problem is that some of the owners want Baltimore as the
other franchise. If they do that Ortwein will move the Pats to St.
Louis. They should just make it easy and add 4 teams. We'll be stuck
with the Pats, St. Louis gets a team. Then you make Jacksonville or
Memphis happy also.
Ron
|
9.696 | fixed for St. Louis | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:08 | 17 |
| Memphis is talking like what everyone seems to suspect: the deck is
rigged for a team to go to St. Louis.
Evidently, or at least so the rumors go, the league wanted to be able to
award St. Louis the franchise yesterday along with Charlotte. But
apparently there's a little trouble in paradise between 2 different
groups who want to own the team. Evidently, at or about the time when the
city was to be making its presentation, all manner of jurisprudence
started to come outta the wood work between the factions. For this or
other reasons the league opted to give the city a couple of weeks to make
a better case.
The Memphis owner was quoted as saying that if'n the franchise is awarded
to St. Louis he would take that as "... we have not prbably been dealt a
straight deck". Comments which will no doubt not improve his standings.
TTom
|
9.697 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:17 | 16 |
| According to the Globe and a writer from St. Louis interviewed
on WEEI, the NFL owners are a little law suit leary at this point.
Fran Murray, of carpet bagger and bad hair fame, is the head of
what is left of the original St. Louis group. He claims that he
has the right to the team. His money man is none other than
Leonard "Hit me, and Get me another drink" Tose. Not the most
desirable ownership group, huh?
The writer from St. Louis thinks the delay is to allow the new
group to get it's act together, and resolve any potential law
suits from Murray. If the situation is cleaned up by the next
meeting, Baltimore might just get the team to avoid a legal
battle. Even the Pats have a better record than the NFL lawyers.
Mike
|
9.698 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Frog Baseball Rooolz!!!! | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:30 | 5 |
| TTom, on this "Personal Seat License" deal, had Charlotte not been
awarded a team would you have gotten your money back? And how far in
advance did you have to fork over the dough?
/Don
|
9.699 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:33 | 3 |
| /er see 142.19
The Crazy Met
|
9.700 | Beer makes the NFL go | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:50 | 2 |
| Busch Beer says the next team goes to St. Louis. It's a matter of $
and sponsorship, not fan support or investment support.
|
9.701 | a little bit | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:54 | 15 |
| Busch has to walk a bit of a line on this.
First of all, what's the threat? No more Bud commercials for NFL? No way.
They don't advertise on the NFL cause they lose money on these ads and
they don't do it to help out the NFL or anyone else but themselves.
Now, there is certainly a financial basis for the league to listen to
them. They're a major contributor to the success of the TV package. And
like other companies at other cities, they play a major financial role in
St. Louis.
But all of this seems to be irrelevant cause it sure looks like the fix
is in and St. Louis will be the 30th franchise.
TTom
|
9.702 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:54 | 17 |
| � Busch Beer says the next team goes to St. Louis. It's a matter of $
� and sponsorship, not fan support or investment support.
[email protected] articles by Mon, 25 Oct 1993:
--------
Subject: NFL owners to meet in Chicago to select two expansion clubs
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 16:10:05 EDT
...
St. Louis is the largest television market in the United States
without an NFL team and is the home of Anheuser-Busch, a prime
advertiser for the league. There are questions, however, regarding fan
support in view of the Cardinals' move out of the city to Phoenix.
|
9.703 | | 17318::DABLER | Is it 1996 yet? | Wed Oct 27 1993 13:20 | 27 |
| RE : <<< Note 9.702 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
>> St. Louis is the largest television market in the United States
>>without an NFL team and is the home of Anheuser-Busch, a prime
>>advertiser for the league. There are questions, however, regarding fan
>>support in view of the Cardinals' move out of the city to Phoenix.
One of the biggest reasons that the Cardinals moved out of St. Louis is that
Bidwell could not get the city and county here in St. Louis to build him a great
big domed stadium so the Cardinals could lose in a climate controlled atmosphere
rather than in Busch Stadium. Fan support was relatively constant, drawing
about 30k to 35k on average, with the occasional sell out with division rivals.
The fan support started dwindling when Bidwell started threatening to move the
'Birds out of the area unless he got what he wanted.
That, and his reputation for not going after quality players and not giving his
coaches enough latitude to make decisions concerning recruiting. Phoenix is
getting a taste of Billy-boy now. How do the folks in Phoenix feel about him?
The general feeling here is that St. Louis wants a football team. I could care
less, because I am simply tired of all the hoopla surrounding the expansion.
But, if we get one here, the fans will turn out and support the team, so long as
the owners don't try to blackmail the city.
Jim()
|
9.704 | Pats are gone + next Farley | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Oct 27 1993 13:50 | 24 |
| Looks like the ideal solution is
Award #2 to Baltimore
Let Orthwein move pats to st loo
Boston will be told - build megaplex and you can have team upon
completion
Owners of foxboro statium needing tennants will offer a great deal
to BC thus solving eagles need for larger park
One flaw is that there is a current patriot lease to 2000+ with foxboro
stadium but I'm not sure how it can be enforced other than some
arbitrator fixing a buyout sum. But, of orthwein fled in the dark of
night and then tried to play a game in (megaplex) massachusetts later
there could be a problem if lease wasn't satisfactorily resolved.
I say pats are gone and why am I not crying.
ps - my 4yr old is Phillip Charles and royal flair seems popular.
Therefore, Kev, How about Fergie Farley
mr helpful
|
9.705 | all a matter of money | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Oct 27 1993 13:56 | 9 |
| Orthwein could simply fulfill the terms of the lease and pay what the
stadium would take in from parking/concessions/etc. on game days. Add a clause
that if the stadium is rented out for something else on those days then
Orthwein, etc. would have to pay a smaller sum for that day.
I assume the Pats game is not sold out for this week; right? If thats the
case then do we get Jets-Giants up here?
The Crazy Met
|
9.706 | | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Wed Oct 27 1993 14:24 | 10 |
| >That, and his reputation for not going after quality players and not giving his
>coaches enough latitude to make decisions concerning recruiting. Phoenix is
>getting a taste of Billy-boy now. How do the folks in Phoenix feel about him?
Jim, as far as I'm concerned, Bidwill is the only constant in the
Cardinals pathetic history. He's a loser and always will be.
>The general feeling here is that St. Louis wants a football team.
What a coincidence! That's how Phoenicians feel too!
|
9.707 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Wed Oct 27 1993 14:51 | 6 |
| TCM,
The Pats are on the road this weekend, so no Jets-Giants game
on the tube in Boston.
Mike
|
9.708 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 27 1993 15:00 | 6 |
| � The Pats are on the road this weekend, so no Jets-Giants game
� on the tube in Boston.
Who is the home team, Jets or Giants? If it's the Jets, the game may
very well be broadcast on Boston's CBS affiliate, Channel 7. The Pats
game will be carried on the NBC affiliate, Channel 4.
|
9.709 | NY Jets at NY Giants, 1 pm | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Wed Oct 27 1993 15:06 | 0 |
9.710 | can't loose those Star Search rating points | CNTROL::CHILDS | thems that die are the lucky ones | Wed Oct 27 1993 15:29 | 10 |
|
> Who is the home team, Jets or Giants? If it's the Jets, the game may
> very well be broadcast on Boston's CBS affiliate, Channel 7. The Pats
> game will be carried on the NBC affiliate, Channel 4.
better chance of seeing pigs fly. Channel 7 will not broadcast a game
against a showing of the patriots on channel 4.
mike
|
9.711 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Wolf, Wolf, Wolf... | Wed Oct 27 1993 15:57 | 8 |
| Hey, when the Jests play the Giants at the Meadowlands, who gets to use
the seats, the Giants season ticket holders?????
Do the Jests fans get shut out, even though their team is playing in
their home stadium, but as the away team???
JaKe
|
9.712 | Giants home team=Jints season tix holda | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Oct 27 1993 15:59 | 8 |
| Hey JaKe,
Take it to the Just ask JaKe note, whar you cain answer yo' own
question..
MikeL
|
9.713 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Wolf, Wolf, Wolf... | Wed Oct 27 1993 16:04 | 6 |
| MikeL
Go do yerself!!
JaKe
|
9.714 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 27 1993 16:08 | 6 |
| � Do the Jests fans get shut out, even though their team is playing in
� their home stadium, but as the away team???
Yup. And likewise for Giants fans when the Jets are the hometeam.
Actually Giants fans are a bit luckier because it's probably easier to
get a seat to a Jets game than to get one to a Giants game.
|
9.715 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Oct 27 1993 16:30 | 6 |
| Since the Jets are the road team, game would have been on NBC. SInce
the Pats are on the road (against whom) they automatically get shown
in their home market. I also seem to recall that the NFL rules prevent
a competing game when the home team is on.
The Crazy Met
|
9.716 | BTW, Pats play Colts | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Oct 27 1993 16:50 | 4 |
| �Since the Jets are the road team, game would have been on NBC.
That's why I asked who was the home team. Sheesh, try to help a guy
out.
|
9.717 | Baltimore might sue | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Thu Oct 28 1993 09:32 | 24 |
| Turns out the threatened lawsuits between the 2 parties trying to land
the NFL franchise for St. Louis aren't the only ones looking at possible
legal action.
The word we're getting here is that when the presentations were made to
the owners, one requirement for consideration is that the groups had to
show letters of credit for $20 mil. 2 franchise hopefuls actually brought
money: Charlotte and one of the Baltimore groups. I couldn't catch the
guys full name but they kept refering to him as "Boogie". Well ol'
Boogie, like Jerry Richardson, showed up with his money and he feels like
the NFL changed the rules then and there cause they had already decided
to award the franchise to St. Louis, whichever group. So Boogie claims
that they couldn't since niether group brought the necessary money with
them.
So far we have St. Louis threatening to sue St. Louis and Memphis and
at least one of the Baltimores looking into suing the NFL.
This morning, Tagliabue (sp?) defended the league saying no decision has
been made on which group or city will get the franchise. Like what else
is he gonna say. In any case, Charlotte has a_NFL franchise and, for the
rest of the participants, it might be time to call in the lawyers.
TTom
|
9.718 | More on the expansion | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 28 1993 09:53 | 84 |
|
[email protected] articles by Oct 26/27, 1993:
--------
Subject: NFL adds Charlotte, holds off on naming other franchise
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 93 21:56:44 PDT
ROSEMONT, Ill. (UPI) -- NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue announced
Tuesday that Charlotte, N.C., would receive one of the two new NFL
franchises, but delayed until Nov. 30 the naming of the second team to
join the league.
Tagliabue said that the franchise from North Carolina had been
selected unanimously by owners, but that the league would wait until an
owners' meeting on Nov. 30 to name the NFL's 30th team.
``The meeting is not to be delayed beyond that date and not to be
adjourned until the franchise is selected,'' Taglibue said.
The commissioner said there will be no further presentations by the
cities of Baltimore, St. Louis, Jacksonvile, Fla., and Memphis, Tenn.,
when the owners meet. He also said the reason for the delay in naming
the second franchise was because owners were unable to reach a consensus
at over seven hours of meetings Tuesday.
Charlotte's team will be called the Panthers and will begin play
along with the other expansion club in the 1995. The chief investor is
former NFL player Jerry Richardson, who heads the highly successful
Flagstar Companies food service chain that includes Denny's restaraunts.
Charlotte investors plan a 72,000-seat stadium.
``This is a dream come true for me and my partners and especially a
dream come true for 10 million people in the Carolinas who have been
with us every step of the way,'' Richardson told Tagliabue.
Richardson said he thought his bid was successful because he and his
investors ``met every challenge the NFL put before us.''
The announcement was greeted by fireworks and celebration at a rally
in downtown Charlotte. A parade will be held Friday to celebrate
Tuesday's decision.
Richardson unveiled the Panthers' new helmet and jersey, featuring
the team's black, blue and silver color scheme. The team will play the
1995 season at Clemson University's Memorial Stadium in Clemson, South
Carolina, before moving into its own facility in 1996.
A number of NFL owners had expressed an interest in getting the
league into the fertile Carolinas market and create regional rivalries
with Atlanta, the Florida clubs and Washington.
Many have intimated that without the success of Charlotte's National
Basketball Association team, the Hornets, the NFL probably would not
have come to North Carolina.
The Hornets proved a medium-sized market can have a major impact in
professional sports by leading the NBA in attendance four of it's five-
year history.
``Obviously, we were a big factor in them getting an NFL franchise,''
Hornet's owner George Shinn said of the group headed by former Baltimore
Colts receiver Jerry Richardson.
``But I don't think the Hornets can take any credit, the ones who
take the credit are the fans,'' Shinn added. ``What they did in buying
the tickets for the Hornets was terrific and what they did in buying
them for the NFL franchise is terrific. As a result, the rest of this
country will realize what a great market we have.''
According to sports agent David Falk, who has represented among
others Michael Jordan of the Chicago Bulls, the economic impact
Charlotte will enjoy with an NFL team is enormous.
``If Michael Jordan is worth $1 billion to the city of Chicago, then
the NFL should be worth hundreds of millions to Charlotte,'' Falk said.
``Half a billion dollars would be a conservative estimate to what an NFL
team is worth to this community.''
Owners began meeting at 2 p.m. EDT and listened to six 15-minute
presentations from the five finalist cities.
An announcement had been expected at around 6 p.m., but three hours
after that deadline had passed one had not been made.
Early in the evening, the expansion committee made up of NFL owners
emerged from its own meeting and presented suggestions to the remaining
owners. The owners held futher discussions and then voted to make
Chalotte the 29th franchise to join the 71-year old league.
The committee reportedly suggested the owners gather more information
on the potential owner partnerships of the expansion franchises,
specifically St. Louis'. The bid by the group from St. Louis was sent
into disarray Monday when general partner Jerry Clinton pulled out and
real estate tycoon Stan Kroenke assumed responsibilities as the main
owner.
The two new clubs will pay close to $150 million each to join the NFL
for the 1995 season and expand the NFL to 30 teams.
Also on the owners' agenda this week is the selection of Super Bowl
sites for the January, 1997, and January, 1998. New Orleans, San Diego
and Tampa Bay are in the running for the 1997 game and San Diego, Tampa
Bay and Los Angeles are bidding for the 1998 title game. The four cities
competing to host the Super Bowls have been the site for 17 of the 27
championship games.
|
9.719 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | We Want Zolak! | Thu Oct 28 1993 11:10 | 14 |
| Kraft and Karp hold a lease to Foxboro Stadium that says that the
Patriots will play their home games there until sometime early in the next
century. The case will not be solved by an arbitrator (unless you mean a
judge) and when Kraft and Karp get their settlement they can book anything
they want for any day of the week, including Sundays when the Patriots play
in their "new" home stadium. There could be an out of court settlement,
but the NFL will not "arbitrate" in this case because it's cut and dry,
Kraft and Karp have a legal document. My personal feeling is that if the
only way the Pats will stay in New England, is if they get a tax funded
SissyPlex somewhere in traffic infested Boston, located smack dab in the
middle of a shopping mall so no tailgating will be allowed, then meet me in
St. Louis (or Baltimore, or Jacksonville or Memphis...).
/Don
|
9.720 | The scenario goes on ... | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Oct 28 1993 11:46 | 16 |
| My main point was that other than the nfl the only thing holding pats
to boston area was that lease. I am curious as to how strong a hold
that is.
I would guess that it's not so strong after all and my scenario is
about to enfold
and don, perhaps tailgating can be done at city point with a shuttle
back and force to the south sta. 'plex
and we'll have the memphis pats and the ny gints to choose from on tv
unless flutie buys a cfl team and moves it here to play last 3-5 years
of his career in boston to fill the gap while no nfl team is in boston.
Hartford is the big loser in his scenario
|
9.721 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | We Want Zolak! | Thu Oct 28 1993 12:03 | 7 |
| As long as Kraft and Karp get their dough they could care less if
New England has a team. Just the thought of tailgating with the
baseball/soccer types who would populate the SissyPlex is enough to
make me turn in my season tickets and take up a new more exciting fall
hobby, like leaf peeping.
/Don
|
9.722 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Thu Oct 28 1993 12:57 | 5 |
| J'ville folks on CNN last night saying, "We want to know now,
we want to get on with our lives, etc." I agree. Why the wait,
for crying out loud?
Scott
|
9.723 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Oct 28 1993 13:13 | 11 |
| � My main point was that other than the nfl the only thing holding pats
� to boston area was that lease. I am curious as to how strong a hold
� that is.
�
� I would guess that it's not so strong after all and my scenario is
� about to enfold
From everything I've read that hold is very strong. The only way to
get out of it is the same way anyone else would get out of a lease --
pay the remaining money the owners have coming to them. In this case,
that's a lot of dough.
|
9.724 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Oct 28 1993 14:58 | 3 |
| but nonetheless it is only money,
The Crazy Met
|
9.726 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | We Want Zolak! | Thu Oct 28 1993 16:15 | 6 |
| I would think that the sweetheart stadium deal that the new St.
Louis Pats would have could ease the pain of paying Kraft and Karp and
that after a couple of "tough" years they would be rolling in the dough
(providing the good people of Missouri would support *this* team).
/Don
|
9.727 | Who sez we didn't support the Cards? | 17318::DABLER | Is it 1996 yet? | Thu Oct 28 1993 16:33 | 9 |
| RE : <<< Note 9.726 by VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD "We Want Zolak!" >>
>> (providing the good people of Missouri would support *this* team).
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> /Don
And who sez we didn't support the old one? WE supported the team; it was the
owner we didn't care for.
Jim()
|
9.728 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Oct 28 1993 16:38 | 3 |
| 30-35K fans a game is hardly support.
The Crazy Met
|
9.729 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | We Want Zolak! | Thu Oct 28 1993 16:39 | 3 |
| I guess I misinterpret support to mean a full stadium.
/Don
|
9.730 | So what's 20K betwixt friends? | 17318::DABLER | Is it 1996 yet? | Thu Oct 28 1993 17:21 | 18 |
| RE : <<< Note 9.729 by VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD "We Want Zolak!" >>>
>> I guess I misinterpret support to mean a full stadium.
/Don
Yer prolly right. I ain't much of a football fan and I really could care less
if'n StL gets a team or not. I'm tired of the hoopla.
Besides, this is primarily a baseball town. Who needs football? :-)
Jim()
ps - When yer stadium only holds just upwards of 53K, 35K looks pretty good -
if'n ya don't look at the empty seats...
|
9.731 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Fri Oct 29 1993 08:51 | 10 |
|
Cmon /er you ain't that young that you can't remember full house back when
Hart and co. had them battling for the division. They're in the best division
in football for rivalries. I don't know of any other division in any sport
where the fans and teams of the division depise one another. You know
"my favorite team is the Giants and anyone who's playing dallas,washington,
philly, or cards and if they're playing one another let it be called cause
they don't have enough players to finish the game.......
|
9.732 | And I love you too Chappy... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 29 1993 09:18 | 14 |
|
> I don't know of any other division in any sport
> where the fans and teams of the division depise one another.
Try the AL East, where the mother of all pro sports rivalries in
Yankees-Red Sox still lives on. Fortunately, one thing that was
preserved in baseball's realignment was this one remaining monster
division (in terms of traditional rivalries). There is no love lost
between Red Sox fans and the Yankees, Blue Jays, Orioles, and even
Indians as this file itself has demonstrated many times.
glenn
|
9.733 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Fri Oct 29 1993 09:29 | 18 |
|
> Try the AL East, where the mother of all pro sports rivalries in
> Yankees-Red Sox still lives on. Fortunately, one thing that was
> preserved in baseball's realignment was this one remaining monster
> division (in terms of traditional rivalries). There is no love lost
> between Red Sox fans and the Yankees, Blue Jays, Orioles, and even
> Indians as this file itself has demonstrated many times.
Does anyone else believe this? I'll give you the Soxs/Yankee or in
fact Anybody/Yanks but Soxs fans generally like the Birds and certainly
have more feelings of compansion that hatred for the Indians.....
mike
|
9.734 | A lot of it is cyclical based on success, but it's there... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 29 1993 09:46 | 18 |
|
> Does anyone else believe this? I'll give you the Soxs/Yankee or in
> fact Anybody/Yanks but Soxs fans generally like the Birds and certainly
> have more feelings of compansion that hatred for the Indians.....
Yeah, I'll give you the Orioles who are just too lovable these days
(but not when Earl Weaver was in charge and kept racing past the
collapsing Bosox every September), but then again I don't think there
was any great hatred for the St. Louis Cardinals even in the Jim Hart
days. I lived near DC in those days and with the Redskins fans it was
all Cowboys, Cowboys, Cowboys. No one gave a damn about the Cards
even when they were winning (including the one year they edged the
Skins for the playoffs on the phantom endzone reception the hatred was
reserved for da refs), or the pathetic Jints or Iggles for that matter
at that time...
glenn
|
9.735 | More on the owners meeting | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 29 1993 09:51 | 42 |
|
[email protected] articles by 27 Oct 93:
Subject: CHICAGO (UI) -- National Football League owners will meet again Nov. 30 to award a second expansion franchise.
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 93 11:41:14 PDT
Charlotte, N.C., was awarded an expansion team Tuesday night by a
unanimous vote of NFL owners in Rosemont, Ill. However, NFL Commissioner
Paul Tagliabue said neither the 12-member joint expansion and finance
committee or the owners could agree on a second expansion city.
Tagliabue said the next meeting ``will not be adjourned until the
second franchise is selected.''
The four remaining cities under consideration are St. Louis,
Baltimore, Jacksonville and Memphis.
Charlotte's team will be called the Carolina Panthers. The chief
investor is former NFL player Jerry Richardson, who heads the highly
successful Flagstar Companies food service chain. Charlotte investors
plan to build a 72,000-seat stadium.
Tagliabue said the decision to award a franchise to Charlotte was
based on the market, fan support, the proposed stadium and the quality
of the ownership group. The NFL's expansion committee unanimously
recommended Charlotte to the full ownership and the owners unanimously
ratified that recommendation.
The announcement was greeted by fireworks and celebration at a rally
in downtown Charlotte. A parade will be held Friday to celebrate the
city's expansion franchise.
Richardson unveiled the Panthers' new helmet and jersey, featuring
the team's black, blue and silver color scheme. The team will play the
1995 season at Clemson University's Memorial Stadium in Clemson, S.C.,
before moving into its own facility in 1996.
The St. Louis bid was complicated by the emergence of a second
ownership group headed by Fran Murray.
James Orthwein, who owns the New England Patriots, had been a partner
in the first ownership group but recently reduced his role to limited
partner. The head of the investment group had been Jerry Clinton, but
Monday withdrew Monday and Stanley Kroenke has taken over the leadership
of the St. Louis entry.
Also on the owners' agenda this week is the selection of Super Bowl
sites for the January 1997, and January 1998 championship games. New
Orleans, San Diego and Tampa Bay are in the running for the 1997 game,
while San Diego, Tampa Bay and Los Angeles are bidding for the 1998
title game.
|
9.736 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Au revoir NAFTA | Fri Oct 29 1993 09:57 | 12 |
| You're right MikeC, I ain't that young. But saying that St. Louis
supported the Cardinals because *when* then were division contenders
they filled the stadium is like saying New England supports the Pats
because for a couple of years after the Super Bowl ride they filled
Shaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium. Neither washes when compared to the
Midgets or 'Skins, but they really pale in comparison to Seattle, who
for the first time since 1977 didn't sell out their stadium 72 hours in
advance of the game last Sunday. Given the lack of competitive teams
Seattle has had that's damn good fan support. If New England loses the
Patriots the real reason will be lack of fan support.
/Don
|
9.737 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Let mine be a voice for peace | Fri Oct 29 1993 10:34 | 29 |
|
> I don't know of any other division in any sport
> where the fans and teams of the division depise one another.
WEll, in the AFC CEntral, the two annual meeting between the STEELERS
and the scum from Clevescum are referred to as the "Back Yard Brawls",
the people of Pittsburgh DESPISE the Clevescum fans, and visa versa.
It's gone as far as if the STEELERS are playing in Clevescum, ya don't
get a motel room anywhere within 50 miles of Clevescum cause the Pa.
plates give ya away and yer tires usually end up slashed or yer
windshield broke or something like that. Plus, the teams have never
been fond of each other, either.
Now, Houscum, with their wussy Baby Blue colors, we fans here in
Pittsburgh hate them too, just they ain't geographically close enuf to
inflict anything on.
The Bungholes, on the other hand,are so pathetic in recent years, I may
just feel some pity for them
NOT!!!!!!
And these views are just about standard among STEELER fans.
JaKe
|
9.738 | NBC may not show NFL nexted year | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Fri Oct 29 1993 11:06 | 13 |
| Just as the NFL is actually starting its expansion, NBC is threatening to
quit showing it on TV.
NBC pres Dick Ebersol claims the network is going to lose over 80 mil
this year which is the final year of their contract. Ebersol says that
the NFL demands are excessive in terms of revenue requests and unless the
league changes its tune, NBC is outta here.
Ebersol goes on further to claim that the future of NFL on TV is with
cable. ESPN and TNT already show some games and he expects someone on
cable to pick up the games if'n NBC bows out.
TTom
|
9.739 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Oct 29 1993 11:27 | 5 |
| US Congress will get into the act very quickly if all those games
are moved to cable. with TNT and ESPN there is a free channel in
the home markets that also shows those games.
The Crazy Met
|
9.740 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 29 1993 11:49 | 5 |
| �US Congress will get into the act very quickly if all those games
�are moved to cable.
On what grounds? Does the Constitution guarantee each citizen free
access to telecasts of sporting events?
|
9.741 | headed for trouble | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Fri Oct 29 1993 11:53 | 16 |
| Crazy,
Among the issues involved is that the local stations are being kept from
broadcasting local sports if'n they're also a superstation. WGH is suing
the NBA right now over a decision to limit the number of Bulls games that
WGN can show.
For NFL, it's even more restrictive than that. The games can only be
shown on the major networks, ESPN, and TNT. No body else can broadcast
the games at all.
The other wrinkle for the NFL is that the revenue is shared between the
various teams across a wide variety of markets. Seattle gets the same
share as Philadelphia.
TTom
|
9.742 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Oct 29 1993 12:06 | 8 |
| Congress could take away the NFL's limited anti-trust exemption to
negotiate a TV contract and cause it a lot of trouble. Congress could also
try to do things based on the Commerce clause of the constitution - interstate
commerce is governed by the feds; NFL could be construed as interstate
commerce. In other words Congress has many ways that they could make
life miserable for the NFL if they chose to.
The Crazy Met
|
9.743 | TV is the issue | HBAHBA::HAAS | Irmo Okra Strut | Fri Oct 29 1993 12:18 | 14 |
| The problem with the anti-trust issues is that one must prove that the
feds have the final say or else it defaults to the states (locals).
As for cable, I know that the local college sports would love to see NFL
leave the networks. In the case of the Panthers, the ACC is already
singing the blues about how they're gonna lose exposure to the NFL. A
college conference can sign a_individual pact with any TV entity. It
doesn't even have to be a TV station or network as in the case with
Raycom Sports, who deals with individual stations for air time.
This whole issue should be turned over to free enterprise and let the
market rule. Where's Rush when you need him?
TTom
|
9.744 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Oct 29 1993 12:29 | 16 |
| TTom,
A number of years ago College Football was sold to TV as a package
deal. Some schools sued claiming that not being able to sell their games
because the NCAA wanted to sell as a package was a violation of anti-trust
rules. The courts agreed and now there is lots of college football broadcast
each weekend. This leads me to believe that if the NFL lost the limited
anti-trust exemption that it has been given by Congress to negotiate a
league-wide TV contract, teams could then sell their games to local
stations. Feds likely have the final say on this kind of anti-trust
because it clearly crosses state lines - if not why would the NFL need
congress to give it a limited anti-trust exemption??
btw: this is not a note on pro/con of allowing PPV/cable.
The Crazy Met
|
9.745 | broadcast the fall | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Oct 29 1993 12:35 | 16 |
| >btw: this is not a note on pro/con of allowing PPV/cable.
Ditto.
One of the problems with sports in general is the proliferation of the
games on TV. NBA viewing on a per game basis is down significantly. Sure
everyone watched the marquee games but when Michael and Charles aren't on
the viewing population dwindles rapidly. And now there aint no Michael.
The CFA was formed in a large part to let the schools handle the TV
situation themselves. Not only did they not want TV or the Feds to
control what they wanted, they were even unwillling to leave it to the
NCAA. Like a lot of business decisions being made now, the CFA didn't
want the overhead of the NCAA.
TTom
|
9.746 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Oct 29 1993 12:41 | 9 |
| MLB is also complaining about so many games available. On given nights I can
switch between 4 baseball games on at the same time (WWOR, TBS, WSBK, ESPN).
re: CFA
The irony of this was that the ratings went down because so many games
were now available and the revenue per school went down.
The Crazy Met
|
9.747 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 29 1993 12:56 | 10 |
|
Plenty okay with me if we continue to see TV revenues crash into the
basement for all sports. With growing technology the games will still
be on in some form or another for those that must see them on the tube
(even if at a price), and some perspective can then be returned to
these events. TV influences sporting events far too much already at
the expense of the in-person paying spectator...
glenn
|
9.748 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Fri Oct 29 1993 13:24 | 4 |
| I haven't seen the Panthers uni's. Are they black jerseys with
outlines of teal & silver?
Tim
|
9.749 | ain't no teal | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Oct 29 1993 13:29 | 15 |
| Firsted of all, let's put that "teal" stuff to rest. The blue is
a_electric royal very different from Hornets teyp teal, Carolina type
baby blue, or Duke type reg'lar blue.
The pants are black with curved, not straight, said same blue and silver
stripes with a little peedee panther. At home the jersey's are Panther
Blue (I guess) with black, white and silver trim. For away, switch white
and blue. Jersey's also have a peedee panther. The helmet is silver with
the black panther.
Evidently the league really liked the idea of black pants. I mean if'n
the fix was in for Charlotte it's nice the league has something
substantial to base it on like color of pants.
TTom
|
9.750 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 29 1993 14:30 | 1 |
| What's a "peedee panther"?
|
9.751 | diminutive | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Oct 29 1993 14:41 | 3 |
| You know like little peedee wheatstraw?\
TTom
|
9.752 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Oct 29 1993 14:49 | 4 |
| �You know like little peedee wheatstraw?\
Must be a Southern thang. If you had said itty bitty, itsy bitsy, or
eensy weensy I'd have known what you were talking about.
|
9.753 | both | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Oct 29 1993 14:59 | 10 |
| Actually, it's both a local thang and a_ethnic thing.
There's a comic that I've seen on the cables who's Italian and talks
about his family in such terms: Joey bag of doughnuts, Little Peedee
wheatstraw, etc.; He goes on but those are 2 that I remember.
Then there's the Peedee Rivers, Great and Little. In the movie "Wild at
Heart" Nicholas Cage pulls time at the Peedee River "facility".
TTom
|
9.754 | Anybody wanna take Murray off'n our hands? | 17318::DABLER | Is it 1996 yet? | Wed Nov 03 1993 10:56 | 13 |
| Latest word I heard on the last expansion team was that the owners may be moving
the Nov. 30 meeting up to the 18th and that if Fran Murray was still in the
picture, St. Louis was NOT going to get the team. Here's a guy who spends
zillions of hours and dollars working to get a team brought to this city and now
is going to screw it all up by being a dork!
I don't get it. and neither will St. Louis. But, I really don't care, 'cause
it's only 5 and a half months 'til spring training...
Jim()
ps - I also heard that Murray is gonna try to get control of the Blues... Geez,
I hope this guy moves....
|
9.755 | Barf | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Wed Nov 03 1993 10:58 | 1 |
| Just what the NFL needs, more black and silver.......
|
9.756 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Wed Nov 03 1993 11:33 | 8 |
| Does anyone know if the Patriots-Bills game will be televised in the
Worcester area ? Sure hope not.
The Cowboys-Giants game will be on CBS at the same time but will not be
shown if the Patriots' game is on the tube. Something to do with NFL
rules...
John "D Cowboys" r.
|
9.757 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Nov 03 1993 11:47 | 13 |
| � Does anyone know if the Patriots-Bills game will be televised in the
� Worcester area ? Sure hope not.
Absolutely since Worcester depends on Providence, Boston, and
Springfield for TV broadcasts. Anyone on the Worcester cable gets
pretty much all Pats games since Springfield is outside of the blackout
zone.
� The Cowboys-Giants game will be on CBS at the same time but will not be
� shown if the Patriots' game is on the tube. Something to do with NFL
� rules...
Are you sure?
|
9.758 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Wed Nov 03 1993 11:57 | 9 |
| Keith, it seems that if the home team is on TV the competing channel
can not televise another game. I sure hope I'm wrong on this because
the Cowboys-Giants game looks to be a good one.
John "D Cowboys" R.
P.S. Anyone know what the call letters are for Channel 7 out of
Boston ? I think I might give them a call to see what they will
show this Sunday.
|
9.759 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 03 1993 11:59 | 3 |
| 7 in Boston: WHDH
The Crazy Met
|
9.760 | | USCTR1::KING | Look, I can hear what you are thinking..... | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:05 | 4 |
| Re: Murray He has stated that if ST Louis gets the nod from the NFL and
he is not a part of the ownership then he will sue the NFL...
REK
|
9.762 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:12 | 7 |
| #$%^$%#$$#%#%$##% !!!!!
I hate this place !!! Channel 7 will not show the Cowboys-Giants game
at 1:00 since the Patriots-Bills game will be shown. Great, now we get
to watch a wannabe-football team get plastered by the Bills.
John "D Cowboys" r.
|
9.763 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:37 | 5 |
| re: .762
join the crowd.
The Crazy Met
|
9.764 | Saw change the name to Zambo and port it over please ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:59 | 14 |
|
John, in the worcester area if you can put rabbit ears or connect an antenna
to your TV, you should be able to pick up CBS Station channel 6 out of
Providence which will have the Giants/Sowboys on. I live in worcester
and have done this on numerous occassions. The Giants vs Sowboys game
is a joke with a 10 point line. Unfortunately the Cowgirls will expose
the Giants's inflated record against bad teams and the supposed "genuis"
of GT Danny Reeves.....
Dallas 35
NYG 10
mike
|
9.765 | | USCTR1::KING | Look, I can hear what you are thinking..... | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:03 | 4 |
| Yep, thats me on top. I call it skill.... My friends (all 2 of them)
call it sh*t luck.... :-}
REK
|
9.766 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:04 | 5 |
| > My friends (all 2 of them)
and one of 'em is REK's pet dog.
The Crazy Met
|
9.767 | I believe someone mentioned a solution to this problem, TCM | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:06 | 8 |
|
> join the crowd.
Yeah, only a city as provincial as Boston would actually follow NFL
rules and put on the games that feature their own team...
glenn
|
9.769 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:13 | 5 |
| Clearly for NBC to have the Pats on in Boston is goodness so the following
question is really hypothetical in nature. If a game is sold out does the local
affiliate HAVE to carry that game or is it simply allowed to carry the game??
The Crazy Met
|
9.770 | Go Pats! | 16421::HEISER | visualize whirled peas | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:14 | 1 |
| We have the same problem: a job with no team.
|
9.771 | | DECWET::METZGER | Ask me if I care. | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:17 | 10 |
|
Call around to a few bars. There's got to be enough of America's team fans out
there to convince some bar to pick it up on a dish instead of showing the
patsies...
Or listen to the game on the radio freeing up your body to do more interesting
things....
Metz
|
9.772 | Let the market talk | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:42 | 13 |
| I suppose the networks or affiliates do have to follow the rules but I
recall a few years back when cable systems chose not to but now there
are watchdogs and fines
And I suppose there have to be rules but I'd like to see cable/nfl tv
rules headcount chopping - perhaps some ex deccie would volunteer to
reduce all tv rules by 1/2
But finally, who in blazes makes these rules and why; simply put the
games on and let the market prevail. Red Auerbach used to have rules
that said "don't give away the product, make em pay" and everyone
bewailed poor celtic attendance and then nba hired professionals to
market the product via tv of all things and ... there I go again
|
9.773 | Keep it in the Family.... | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 03 1993 13:46 | 6 |
| >
> And I suppose there have to be rules but I'd like to see cable/nfl tv
> rules headcount chopping - perhaps some ex deccie would volunteer to
> reduce all tv rules by 1/2
Maybe Don Palmer could appoint a new Capo to do that......
|
9.774 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 03 1993 14:28 | 9 |
| re: .772
At least in this case allowing the market to rule would not have "helped"
in getting the NY-Dallas game on the tube.
Ratings for sports in Boston is generally good when a local team is playing;
when there in no local team the Boston market tends to be the lowest rated
major TV market for that event.
Tha Crazy Met
|
9.775 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Nov 03 1993 14:40 | 9 |
| �If a game is sold out does the local
�affiliate HAVE to carry that game or is it simply allowed to carry the game??
Why wouldn't they? The local team will most likely garner much higher
ratings than any other team they could put on.
I know there is a rule that the local affiliate has to stick with the
local team for the entire game, no matter what the score, no matter who
else is on, and no matter if it runs into the later game.
|
9.776 | sheesh! | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 03 1993 14:45 | 4 |
| Mac, you didn't answer the question. Sure the local team is likely to garner
higher ratings; the question was on the rule not the business decision.
The Crazy Met
|
9.777 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Nov 03 1993 15:05 | 6 |
|
�Mac, you didn't answer the question.
My point was that even if there wasn't a rule that the hometown TV
station had to carry the hometown team, do you think the hometown TV
station would carry someone else?
|
9.778 | Reading Comprehension 101 should help | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 03 1993 15:19 | 9 |
| > Clearly for NBC to have the Pats on in Boston is goodness so the following
> question is really hypothetical in nature.
we agree on this point Mac.
That is why the question is hypothetical. I'm wondering what the NFL rules
are on something like this.
The Crazy Met
|
9.779 | Waisted disk space | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Wed Nov 03 1993 18:10 | 5 |
| All this talk concerning a game that the score should be mailed in?
I would love to see the Pats beat 'em, but I guess I will have to wait
until next year...
Tim
|
9.780 | duh? | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Thu Nov 04 1993 07:57 | 6 |
|
Well with all the revenue sharing the NFL and networks do it makes alot of
sense to have the rule. That way you can insure local advertiser to buy
buy buy commerical time....
mike
|
9.781 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 04 1993 10:12 | 3 |
| last I heard there was no revenue sharing between the NFL and the networks.
The Crazy Met
|
9.782 | TV and properties | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 04 1993 10:36 | 9 |
| The current TV money is shared as is NFL properties. Any and all local
money is kept by the franchise.
As a sidelight to this issue, the league made the new franchises agree to
not getting into this money for the first couple of years. No TV money
and no paraphenalia money. The Carolina Panthers don't get a dime for all
them T-Shirts being sold.
TTom
|
9.783 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Thu Nov 04 1993 10:41 | 9 |
| �As a sidelight to this issue, the league made the new franchises agree to
�not getting into this money for the first couple of years. No TV money
�and no paraphenalia money. The Carolina Panthers don't get a dime for all
�them T-Shirts being sold.
Durned good thang that the seasons tickets are so expensive. It's the only way
they make money...
=Bob=
|
9.784 | PSLs the issue | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 04 1993 10:53 | 18 |
| Actually, there is a minor issue with the Panthers making money. They've
pretty much signed away everything for the first couple of years. Then
they went and upped the ante for how much they pay the visiting team.
They're now gonna be paying more than any othre franchise. And the lasted
straw is the the players union, who have to agree on everything, is
making noises about not liking the way PSLs work. The Personal Seat
Licenses were pulled out of the shared kitty during the negotiations with
the league and the players union is talking like they wanna get in on the
$100+ mil that's being raised.
The PSL money is really not anything net, except the interest they get
between now and when they actually have to shell out some bucks to start
the stadium construction.
And we settled the issue of these "expensive" season tickets which they
aint.
TTom
|
9.785 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 04 1993 11:14 | 7 |
| �And we settled the issue of these "expensive" season tickets which they
�aint.
Only if you're either buying the line about the PSL being an investment
instead of a fee, or you're going to be a lifetime season ticket holder
and will amortize the price of the PSL over the life of your season
tickets.
|
9.786 | don't need a lifetime | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 04 1993 11:21 | 11 |
| > Only if you're either buying the line about the PSL being an investment
There's no belief system required. I'm paying 2700 bucks for my PSL. It
will never be worth less that 2700 bucks. In fact, in January its value
increases because the price of the remaining PSLs increases by 10%.
Shortly thereafter, there will be no PSLs available. At that time, I'll
be able to sell my PSL for a 10% profit.
No tell me again how this isn't a_investment?
TTom
|
9.787 | The team won't be able to perpetually flounder; big $ at stake... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Nov 04 1993 15:53 | 31 |
|
> No tell me again how this isn't a_investment?
I have my doubts that a PSL that costs 5+ years worth of season
tickets will steadily appreciate in value over the long term. Maybe it
will, and maybe it won't, but undoubtedly it'll depend on the quality
of the team on the playing field. The franchise *is* taking some risk
in guaranteeing the initial purchase price of these things. Look at
what's happened with other unsuccessful franchises like Tampa Bay,
Indianapolis, Phoenix and New England. What do you think would happen
if the regular season-ticket holders of these teams were right now given
the choice between the right to renew for the next year or $2700 cash put
back in their hands? There'd be a run on the bank, and the teams would
have to start from scratch in re-selling their season tickets without
the initial investment in a license. In fact, in these cities you
literally couldn't pay enough people to take such a license that
obligates them to by a season's pass...
It's a unique and interesting approach that Carolina has taken. It
gives them a very real incentive to be successful, and the specter of
60,000+ PSLs hanging over the team's head might also serve to keep the
season ticket prices at a below-market level if the team still struggles
after the first few years. Then again, perhaps I've underestimated how
well the Carolinas would support this team if it's not successful (as so
many expansion franchises have not been). I suspect that aside from the
great season here or there that the team will never generally be as
immensely popular as it is right now. That's just the way it is with
new things...
glenn
|
9.788 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:04 | 4 |
| Any accountant types out there? Would PSL's go on the books as Liabilities -
similar to the way airlines need to account for frequent flier miles??
The Crazy Met
|
9.789 | Hope this helps! | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:09 | 7 |
| <<< Note 9.788 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>
>Any accountant types out there?
Yes
Kevin
|
9.790 | we shall see | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:12 | 26 |
| Right now, the PSL investor is assured of not losing any money.
As for your question, most of us who are looking for any immediate return
would want to wait until the last of the PSLs go on sale in January at
which time you're likely to get $2970 (2700 + 270).
Certainly, if the Panthers do their best imitation of the current Rams or
Pats it might change the nature of this investment. There is no guarantee
that the PSL price support subsidy will be in place forever although we
have it in writing at this time.
Now to totally lose the investment, there has to be no demand whatsoever
for tickets. As long as there are people interested in season tickets, at
all, it won't become worthless. The Panthers are making it very clear
that you gotta have a PSL to get season tickets.
So any way you slice and dice it, it's a_investment even though it
certainly could be argued that it might, under the wrong circumstances,
not be that smart or profitable.
The one who's kicking himself right now about PSLs is George Shinn, the
Hornets owner. If'n he had thought of this, there's no way he
wouldn't've done it. As it is, I have Hornets season tickets rights
without any PSL - no investment - and that's worth 2-3K right now.
TTom
|
9.791 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:39 | 7 |
| Bottom line is cost. You can get a season ticket to the Patriots at
$28/seat/game. To get a Panther season ticket you have to shell out
$2700 plus a per seat, per game price. Whose tickets are more
expensive?
Are most Caroliners buying PSLs as investments or as a way to buy
season tickets?
|
9.792 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:43 | 9 |
| Bottom line is Return on Investment. You could argue that the investment
would appreciate better elsewhere, on the other hand you are guaranteed not
to lose the principal.
Doesn't matter why they are buying the PSL; it is the underlying structure
that counts. I suspect PSL's in some form or other will appear on the Panthers
balance sheet.
The Crazy Met
|
9.793 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:44 | 9 |
| OK !!! I've got it all worked out. There is a bar/restaurant in
Sturbridge called "The Connection" that has promised to show the
Cowboys-Giants game.
This is not illegal as they catch the CBS station out of Conn. I
will be there if anyone is interested.
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.794 | S T H MtM | PFSVAX::JACOB | The King returns! | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:45 | 10 |
| MAC,
there's one difference,
The Panthers will win a Super Bowl before the Patriot's do.
(8^)
JaKe
|
9.795 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:46 | 5 |
| re: .793
too far to get to.
The Crazy Met
|
9.796 | good old irish Folk Muisic | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:47 | 20 |
|
Maybe they folks in Carolina got extra moola for PSL cause they ain't got
no form of regressive tax (lottery) to toss their money at....who cares
TTom doesn't feel ripped off why should you guys????
Speaking of Tossin'
I heard this song this morning an Irish ballard about "Look what we've done
to the mother-tougue" it was absolutely hilarious...
it picked up certain slang terms and explain how that wasn't the way they
were meant...
"remember when a joint was a part of you body"
"when smack was a thing you got form mommsy wommsy when you were badcee
wasdcee"
"when Tossing off was thing Scot did with a Caber"...
countless more I missed half cause I was laugh so hard....
|
9.797 | | DECWET::METZGER | Ask me if I care. | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:56 | 19 |
|
Actually it's more of a bond or a license than a pure investment. The team is
licensing the ticket buying rights to individuals.
My guess is that the PSL money will be seen as an escrow type money on the book
because they are guarenteeing a return of the $$ if you return your PSL.
EIther way it's a Michael Milken wet dream because the franschise could go
belly up at any time and the PSL owners would be last in the line of creditors
to get the money back....essentially it's an interest free loan to the owners
that they use to secure the franchise and stadium rights...
For PSL owners it's a deal if you intend to keep getting tickets in perpetuity
and they remain scarce (like Redskin or Giants tickets scarce) IF the team
flounders and the demand for tickets drops lower than capacity you aren;t
going to make any money unloading your PSL and the club might pull some
shenanigans around their "guarentee" of refunding it.
Metz
|
9.798 | now down the road it could go sour | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:58 | 18 |
| > TTom doesn't feel ripped off why should you guys????
That pretty much sums it up.
Most people are buying PSLs cause it'll be the only way to get Panthers
tickets. Some are buying them as investments but they are in the distinct
minority.
I'll conceed the math that right now my "costs" are more than they would
be for say the Pats. But as soon as I sell, then my "costs" become less
cause for the PSL will increase in value in January.
The whole issue is that right now sports has a special place in
Charlotte. With the continued influx of people and money to this area
it's hard to imagine the PSL becoming worthless. The Hornets were pretty
bad for 3 or 4 years but you didn't notice it at the box office.
TTom
|
9.799 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 04 1993 16:59 | 6 |
|
Making anything out of support for an expansion team is at best dubious. The
real test will be if the Hornets are very good for a number of years and
then are dismal for 3-4 years what happens in those 3-4 years.
The Crazy Met
|
9.800 | not a fixed pie | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 04 1993 17:04 | 15 |
| Add this to the mix, Crazy:
What if the Hornets go south and the Panthers really take off. The
Hornets tickets might not be worth anything which is what I spent to get
the rights to buy season tickets.
There is some concern around here for the Hornets who will no longer be
the only game in town. The local colleges are expressing concern about
their ability to stay in the limelight. The best thing going right now
for these concerns is the local economy which is expanding. Charlotte was
listed in either Fortune or Money as having the fastest growing economy
the last 10 years when measured in terms of new job growth. Some 200,000
new jobs have been added in Charlotte the last 10 years.
TTom
|
9.801 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Thu Nov 04 1993 17:09 | 7 |
|
Forget it TCM, as long as Zo' stays in Charlotte the team will be more
than just competitive......
if only they had gotten Rodman....
mike
|
9.802 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 04 1993 17:11 | 6 |
| re: .801
true; forget about the specific numbers I used, it is the theory
that is interesting.
The Crazy Met
|
9.803 | a long time, hopefully | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 04 1993 17:13 | 10 |
| Everyone should get used to Zo and LJ playing for Charlotte. The entire
fortunes of the team have come about cause of them two. LJ is signed for
approximately forever and nexted year the Hornets will provide Zo with
similar status.
Nexted year, they'll have about 3 mil per year to sign a free agent and
with the exemption given for signing the top pick the Hornets should
continue to improve.
TTom
|
9.804 | Nfl rejects Childress contract - more suits? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Nov 04 1993 17:19 | 8 |
| Childress apparently has a "right of first refusal" clause in the new
contract.
I have to admire the nfl and its lawyers who are consistently ignoring
the courtroom verdicts which deny them the monopoly status they covet.
Childress can eventually sue just like silky sullivan for the differ on
this and his eventual contract
|
9.805 | legal lovefest | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 04 1993 17:22 | 4 |
| Hail, all of this is just warmup. Wait until nexted year when there's a
real cap. Then you'll see some serious litigations going on.
TTom
|
9.806 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Thu Nov 04 1993 17:43 | 13 |
| > <<< Note 9.792 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94"
> >>>Bottom line is Return on Investment. You could argue that the
> investment would appreciate better elsewhere, on the other hand you are
> guaranteed notto lose the principal.
There is no guarantee that you won't lose the principal. What happens
if after 3-4 years, they stop selling out? The owners could either
stop charging the PSL (that'd go over real well with the people who
paid it), sell the team to another group who doesn't charge the PSL, or
go bankrupt. At that time, the PSL is worthless. As long as you don't
look at this thing as an investment, you're OK.
brews
|
9.807 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 04 1993 19:16 | 8 |
|
It all depends on if the guarantee is part of a contract or verbla.
I agree that folks don't think of it as an investment, but it IS more
than an addition to the ticket price.
The Crazy Met
|
9.808 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 04 1993 19:16 | 6 |
| re: Childress
what was the quirk in his contract?
The Crazy Met
|
9.809 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Nov 05 1993 09:39 | 4 |
| It wasn't completely explained something to do with right of first
refusal. I am guessing he signed somethinga akin to the nba dudley
contract in which current or in childress case future cap
considerations are being bypassed.
|
9.810 | Proud PSL Proprietor | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 05 1993 10:04 | 11 |
| I don't look at my PSL as a_investment. I bought it cause it's the
onliest way to assure oneself of Panther tickets. They are going to sell
out.
However, I don't understand why one shouldn't look at it that way. Just
because the whole thing can go sour doesn't change anything. I invest in
one of them high growth funds and it's involved in oversea firms, highly
speculative, etc. It could go into the toilet but it's still
a_investment.
TTom
|
9.811 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Fri Nov 05 1993 10:31 | 10 |
| > It all depends on if the guarantee is part of a contract or verbla.
This has nothing to do with the security of the funds should the
Panthers file chapter 11.
Heard today that the NFL is not happy that the Panthers are trying to
claim that some of their seats are luxury boxes when they really are
not.
brews
|
9.812 | club seats | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 05 1993 10:37 | 15 |
| Right you are Brews.
What the Panthers did was to invest a thing they called a club seat.
They made tickets available to the company that bought the luxury boxes.
These tickets surround the boxes. They're trying to say that this is part
of the box sales because that money is allowed to be kept by the home
team.
It's not just the NFL but this is also part of the concerns raised by the
players union.
This won't, however, be any type of roadblock to the team. It is, how you
say, merely a matter of money.
TTom
|
9.813 | Just another reason to beware; they may come for you next... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Nov 05 1993 11:16 | 40 |
|
I don't really care if a PSL is an investment or not nor whether
individuals feel they are getting their money's worth, but I do hope
that this concept of a "license that allows you to buy a license (your
ticket)" is one that doesn't spread. Sure, instead of pocketing the
longterm interest on some $100+M in up front capital, Carolina could
have just as easily calculated the price of the tickets alone on market
demand and started at $100/pop and have sold the place out without any
trouble. It still doesn't make me feel any better that if a person has
any intention of going to a game or two with his spouse or kid (much
less a family) that he better have $5000 in cash up front or be forced
to deal with the hackers in the scalping aftermarket at hundreds per game.
None of the shenanigans that have gone on with this latest NFL expansion
has changed my low opinion of monopolistic pro sports franchises
and the king's ransoms they demand from a community to operate at their
obscene profit levels. If the Patriots continue to make related demands
with this ludicrous Mondo-plex proposal (not that the Patriots are in as
strong a bargaining position as Carolina, but they still are the only
game in town), I say let them go to St. Louis, Hartford, Memphis or
wherever else the people are willing to put up with these absurdities.
At some point even NFL football is just not worth the price.
With the kind of stadium subsidies, licenses, fees and whatnot that
we're talking about that now extend into the hundreds of millions of
dollars (all in order to cater to the affluent sports consumer), once
again, I can't see where it wouldn't be more cost-effective to tell the
monopolistic franchises to stick their bribes and to have the state or
local public groups buy the teams outright (now that the NFL has lost the
Sullivan case the self-protection against this kind of ownership should
be removed). The teams might not be well run but at least if you have
some small stake in the operation there's a possibility to get into a
game at a regular price in a regular seat at a regular stadium. Do you
think the Packers would still be in that pocket of wealth known as Green
Bay WI if the team weren't community-owned? The average Green Bay sports
fan saw the writing on the wall about 25 years ago and made a very
intelligent decision...
glenn
|
9.814 | money talks | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 05 1993 11:24 | 12 |
| Glenn,
There's been a lot of complaints about the prices.
If you look at what is required for the seats that I have, I will have
spent 4500 bucks the first 3 seasons, which given that they make you buy
10 tickets - 2 preseason, 8 regular - that works out to a cool $150 just
to get into the place. There's a lot of folks who aren't going to be
either able or willing to do that. The math for the first season's 10
tickets is even worse.
TTom
|
9.815 | | MKFSA::LONG | a foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mind | Fri Nov 05 1993 11:28 | 16 |
| Whoaa there Glenn! Wait one socialistic minute! Do the words
"free enterprise" mean anything to you? If enough people stop
purchasing an item the seller will either adjust his price or
go out of business.
"Have the state purchase the team" - Are you nuts? Name one thing
that any government agency has taken over and not caused to turn
into crapola.
Remember, if you don't like a product don't buy it. Don't ask the
government to regulate the price so "everyone will have an equal
chance to buy it."
Phew, I feel better now.
billl
|
9.816 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Fri Nov 05 1993 11:42 | 3 |
|
And look how well the Packers have done since they were purchased by
"the state." 8^)
|
9.817 | Free? Since when? (No, I'm not nuts...) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Nov 05 1993 11:43 | 24 |
|
> Whoaa there Glenn! Wait one socialistic minute! Do the words
> "free enterprise" mean anything to you? If enough people stop
> purchasing an item the seller will either adjust his price or
> go out of business.
>
> "Have the state purchase the team" - Are you nuts? Name one thing
> that any government agency has taken over and not caused to turn
> into crapola.
Fine, then no tax money for a Megaplex. No more rent-free deals. No
more gifts of land. The state can't be trusted in their negotiations
of these matters (besides, who do *you* really think is benefiting from
these deals?). Let the market sort it out. *That's* free enterprise.
Besides, one of the solutions I gave was local public ownership. Sale
of shares of stock. Far as I know, that concept also falls under free
enterprise. Whoops, prohibited by NFL rules. Whoops, implemented
once already by the Patriots before the NFL/Sullivan team changed the
rules and colluded to rip off the stockholders (proved in court). Hey,
that NFL is just one great shining example of free enterprise in action...
glenn
|
9.818 | Free Enterprise vs Socialism not simple arg. | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Nov 05 1993 11:53 | 17 |
| But there are laws and one is in regard to indenture which was
practiced by major league baseball until 1976. when the celtics
drafted danny ainge and planned to have him play basketball when his
baseball contract (short term in those days) expired the blue jays
essentially said he was indentured to them.
Under total "free enterprise" some would say Danny signed for life but
society has outlawed serfdom.
similarly society will put certain restrictions on free enterpriese run
riot and vversa.
The charlotte thing I am not against as it seems to be acting in favor
of the market but wherever certain govt protections are asked for
"enforce a contract" the enterprise has to expect some overseeing.
In a nutshell it isn't that simple anymore
|
9.819 | | MKFSA::LONG | a foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mind | Fri Nov 05 1993 12:09 | 15 |
| >> Fine, then no tax money for a Megaplex. No more rent-free deals. No
>> more gifts of land. The state can't be trusted in their negotiations
>> of these matters (besides, who do *you* really think is benefiting from
>> these deals?). Let the market sort it out. *That's* free enterprise.
Abso-frggin-lootly! On this we agree.
In no way was I trying to put the NFL up on some pedastal as a
shining example of how free enterprise works. All the professional
sports are the closest thing to serfdom we have. I just feel that
having a state-run NFL team is not what I would want my tax dollars
spent on.
billl
|
9.820 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Nov 05 1993 12:30 | 6 |
| re: first season tix
TTom, didn't tix for the first season come as part of the PSL?
The Crazy Met
|
9.821 | PSL does not include any tickets | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 05 1993 12:35 | 8 |
| Noop. You have to buy the PSL and then you have to each and every season
ticket thereafter.
The only catch about the first season is that if'n you don't want no part
of Clemson, you don't have to buy the first season tickets. But after
that, you gotta buy or sell the PSL, one way or the other.
TTom
|
9.822 | just when I thought I had it figured out... | MKFSA::LONG | a foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mind | Fri Nov 05 1993 12:48 | 10 |
| I reread .821 several times and it sounds like you are saying that
the PSL must be re-purchased every year along with the season tickets.
Is that what you meant? Or is the PSL a one-timer and the season
tickets re-purchased every year?
I thought the PSL was a one-timer that guarenteed you a season ticket,
if you choose to purchase it, for as long as you hold that PSL.
billl
|
9.823 | PSL once, tickets every year | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 05 1993 12:52 | 9 |
| The PSL is a one-time thang. With it you get the rights to buy season
tickets but you do not get the tickets. You have to separetly purchase
the season tickets each year.
If, after the second season, you don't buy the season tickets, you
forfeit the PSL at which time you must sell it, either to another
individual or to the Panthers for resell and a markup, one would presume.
TTom
|
9.824 | | MKFSA::LONG | a foot-stompin'-honky-tonkin' state of mind | Fri Nov 05 1993 13:00 | 6 |
| re .823
Thanks TTom, that's what I thought.
billl
|
9.825 | this sentence no verb | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 05 1993 13:05 | 3 |
| Yeah, somewhere in .821, something was missing.
TTom
|
9.827 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 05 1993 14:17 | 1 |
| All I said is that Carolina Panther season tickets are very expensive.
|
9.828 | PSL + tickets = expensive | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 05 1993 14:35 | 4 |
| Actually, the case you were making was that you lump the PSL with the
season tickets to arrive at the conclusion that this total is expensive.
TTom
|
9.830 | a range | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 05 1993 15:32 | 3 |
| Prices are fro 190 to 600 bucks for the season. Its a 10 ticket packet.
TTom
|
9.831 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 05 1993 15:37 | 9 |
| �Actually, the case you were making was that you lump the PSL with the
�season tickets to arrive at the conclusion that this total is expensive.
Which you verified:
�If you look at what is required for the seats that I have, I will have
�spent 4500 bucks the first 3 seasons, which given that they make you buy
�10 tickets - 2 preseason, 8 regular - that works out to a cool $150 just
�to get into the place.
|
9.833 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Nov 09 1993 11:01 | 6 |
|
So, uhh, how long has Ned Beatty been coach of the Packers?
|
9.834 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Tue Nov 09 1993 15:52 | 7 |
| re-.1
SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL!!!!!!
JaKe
|
9.835 | Inquiring mindless | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Tue Nov 09 1993 16:29 | 9 |
| Anybody see the "celebration" the one KC guy did lasted night??
He runs over towards the sidelines and gets down on 3 legs, with the
other one lifted up like a dog at a hydrant??? What's he trying to
prove with that, that he's a useless animal that needs kicked around a
little??
JaKe
|
9.836 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Nov 09 1993 16:32 | 3 |
| I was gonna put that in the Ask JaKe note
The Crazy Met
|
9.837 | gone | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Tue Nov 09 1993 16:54 | 3 |
| While you're at it, ask JaKe how come da Bears just cut da Fridge?
TTom
|
9.838 | couldn't spit too, but wouldn't be as effective | 16421::HEISER | the NBA: it's pretty darn good | Tue Nov 09 1993 17:10 | 3 |
| Re: Tripod
He's making a visual statement to the opposition's competentcy.
|
9.839 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 10 1993 09:08 | 10 |
| >While you're at it, ask JaKe how come da Bears just cut da Fridge?
He ate himself outta the uniform.
I'm trying to figure out why Danny Boy Reeves cut Landetta in favor
of Horan. The Denver kicking squad ain't THAT good......
'saw
|
9.840 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | So close to zero ground | Wed Nov 10 1993 10:21 | 9 |
|
>>While you're at it, ask JaKe how come da Bears just cut da Fridge?
Probably something to do with it costing the Bears too much to feed him
at the training table, plus the fact that he has a whopping 8 tackles
in 8 games, and his knees are buckling under his tonnage.
JaKe
|
9.841 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Need a nap? Watch tv baseball! | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:03 | 11 |
| Horan is a great punter. He can put it consistantly inside the
20 better than anyone. His long punts, or lack of, is what got him
canned. After his knee tore up last year, he just didn't seem to kick
the 55-60 yarders anymore.
I thought Landetta was a pro-bowler a few times?
This is just the start. Wait 3 years. The good OL the jints have
now will most likely not be upgraded as they get older/injured.
Tim
|
9.842 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Wed Nov 10 1993 12:58 | 12 |
|
Landetta was a probowler and also was the only guy in the league to average
over 40 net yards per kick over the last 5 years. Horan is excellent at the
pooch as you say Tim.
Landetta also tore up a knee last year and may not be totally healed. He
is also like Pepper Johnson a free spirit who didn't quite see eye to eye
with Good Time Danny....
oh well atleast I don't have to worry about GTD bring Elway with him...
mike
|
9.843 | officially a 'Boy | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Wed Nov 10 1993 15:26 | 10 |
| I guess it's official. Bernie has been signed by Dallas.
He steps in as #3 but Johnson is talking like he actually could start. I
guess this means that Hugh Millen is history and Bernie might actually
get a super bowl ring outta this.
The extra special bonus part of this is that Cleveland gets to pay him
the rest of the 5 mil they owe him.
TTom
|
9.844 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:24 | 8 |
| Good fer Bernie!
I guess he'll get his chance to show how good he can be with a real
team behind him!
Chip_GSH_Bach
(Closet Browns Fan, closet Kosar fan)
|
9.845 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Gonna show her my ding-dong | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:25 | 5 |
| What kind of dresses and pumps is he going to wear for Sunday's
game????
JaKe
|
9.846 | | DECWET::METZGER | America's most beloved game show host | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:28 | 6 |
|
I thought he was going to wear one of them Dallas Cowboy Cheerleader outfits...
ugh,,,what a mental image...
Metz
|
9.847 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | MAC IS BACK! | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:38 | 11 |
| I'm a bit surprised that Bernie is going to Dallas. He's got to be
thinking that this is only a temporary situation. Will he be happy
riding the bench? Of course for Dallas, this is a fantastic move.
Bernie is still quite capable of leading a team. He won't know what to
think playing behind the line in Dallas, along with Smith, Irvin,
Harper, et al.
Aikman will most certainly be rested now I'd think. If he needs even
more time, so be it. They play the lowly Falcons after this weekend.
- Bob
|
9.848 | still can start | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:47 | 18 |
| Bernie is obviously a hedge on whether or not Garrett can actually
perform as a starter.
So many times when the backup has to come in, he shines in that game only
to look like the scrub he is the nexted game when he starts. One need
look no further to the Salisbury situation in Minnesota where they were
drubbed by San Diego to celebrate his first start.
There are exceptions, most notable this year being Scott Mitchell but
even he came back to earth against the Jets.
I'd think that the Cowboys are just making sure that they have a Plan B
if'n Garrett caint get it done. I agree with Bernie's assessment of his
abilities and that is he's still able to start in the NFL. I'm a little
suprised that given the QB woes in Philly he didn't get a_offer there. I
mean, who wouldn't take Bernie over either O'Brien or Bubby?
TTom
|
9.849 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:49 | 4 |
| Since Bernie can't move he needs a team with the type of OL that the
Cowboys have.
The Crazy Met
|
9.850 | good line, good team, good schedule | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:52 | 9 |
| Totally agree, Crazy.
And it don't hurt to have Emmett Smith in the backfield witcha and having
Michael Irvin, Alvin Harper, and Jay Novacek as targets.
And the nexted 2 games against Phoenix and Atlanta won't hurt his cause,
neither.
TTom
|
9.851 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Gonna show her my ding-dong | Wed Nov 10 1993 16:53 | 6 |
| He just gotta hope he don't break a heel in the middle of the game.
AND, he better remember not to wear his girdle.
JaKe
|
9.852 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 10 1993 17:34 | 4 |
| And I KNEW I was right -- Deberg went to MIAMI to back up
Mitchell...
The Jests indeed.....hmpphh....8^)
|
9.853 | I made a mistake, so shoot me! | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Nov 10 1993 18:20 | 15 |
| ! <<< Note 9.852 by CAMONE::WAY "You can't polish a turd" >>>
!
!And I KNEW I was right -- Deberg went to MIAMI to back up
!Mitchell...
!
!The Jests indeed.....hmpphh....8^)
'Sas,
Hey, I admitted I made a mistake, a rarity in SPROTS, you must admit.
:-)
Kevin
|
9.854 | Just don't do it on the day of my daughter's wedding | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Nov 10 1993 19:15 | 9 |
| Okay, we'll let if go this time.
I gave you a smilie over in the other topic.
But, if you REALLY wanna get shot, I got a few buddies
who could take care of da job, if you know what I mean....;^) ;^)
Don 'Saw
|
9.855 | | USCTR1::KING | Be a MAN, low maintenance!!! | Wed Nov 10 1993 21:30 | 6 |
| With Kosar and Deberg signings two former 1992 Pats QB got the axe...
Millen and Hobson....
REK
Can Zolak be far behind....
|
9.856 | | 16421::HEISER | the NBA: it's pretty darn good | Wed Nov 10 1993 22:01 | 1 |
| It's only a natural a cross-dressing QB play for the Cowgirls.
|
9.857 | Trade you Aikman for Proel | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Thu Nov 11 1993 07:51 | 8 |
|
Dallas picked him for two reasons IMO, for a later trade and leverage
against Aikman come contract time. We all saw how underhanded Jerry
can get with Emitt, he's on record as stating that the way the Sowboys
are playing that "They're playing is going to make Aikman the highest
paid player in the league". He didn't say he was going to pay him.
mike
|
9.858 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Thu Nov 11 1993 08:56 | 5 |
| Jake, now that Kosar has left the Almost Football Conference Central
Division you can cut the skirt-wearing stuff. He is now a member of
the manly Cowboys and no longer a Brown. :)
John "D Cowboys" R.
|
9.859 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Thu Nov 11 1993 09:03 | 1 |
| Yeah, now he's gonna wear cute little blue shorts and a white halter top....8^)
|
9.860 | Help be shopping the Galleria in no time | SPECXN::BROWN | Real Men only need 12 bits | Thu Nov 11 1993 10:19 | 8 |
|
Bernie will fit right in in Big "D" it being the fashion capitol
of the southwest. I can't beleive JJ picked up this clown other than he has
to be better than Hugh Millen the pats reject.
Cadzilla2
|
9.861 | some news | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 11 1993 10:59 | 15 |
| more news:
Joe aint gonna start for KC. Krieg gets another start.
Sean Salisbury starts again for the Vikings. McMahon is still
recuperating from a separated shoulder.
Eric Swann had surgery on his knee and will be out for the season. The
Cards are claiming he was injured by a crackback block in the Eagles
game.
The proposed sale of the Dolphins fell through. The heirs of Joe Robbie
are trying to sell the team to pay off taxes.
TTom
|
9.862 | first half bestest | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 11 1993 11:51 | 17 |
| USA Today, in a_obvious ploy to promote professional sports at the
expense of the college games, has chosen their first half Whatevers of
the Year (WOYs).
Offensive MVP Troy Aikman, QB, Dallas
Defensive MBP Rod Woodson, CB, Pittsburgh
Top Coach Dan Reeves, Giants
Special Team Eric Metcalf, Cleveland
Offensive Rookie Rick Mirer, QB, Seattle
Defensive Rookie Eric Curry, DL, Tampa Bay
Kicker John Carney, San Diego
Punter Reggie Roby, Washington
Most Likely to be Fired Joe Bugel, Phoenix
Biggest Surprise Bernie Kosar's release by Cleveland
Biggest Flop Richie Petitbon, Washington
TTom
|
9.863 | | GWEN::ASHE | Do you have to let it linger? | Thu Nov 11 1993 12:40 | 2 |
| Carney over Jason Hanson?
|
9.864 | gets the nod | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 11 1993 12:58 | 9 |
| They gave Carney the nod because of his record streak, 29 FGs without a
miss, and the fact that the Chargers have won 2 games without a
touchdown. Carney had 6 FGs in each of these games.
But, it's only USA Today and it's only for the first half. It looks like
the Chargers have turned it around and won't have to rely so heavily on
Carney.
TTom
|
9.865 | I like Bettis over Mirer too... | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Thu Nov 11 1993 13:05 | 10 |
|
I'd love to hear the reasoning for Aikman... "Cause John Madden said so",
probably.....
Certainly Barry Foster or Emitt deserve it more than the Boytoy of Sowland..
Reeves? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
|
9.866 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 11 1993 13:18 | 4 |
| �Offensive MVP Troy Aikman, QB, Dallas
I'd give it to Smith over Aikman. Afterall, the 'Boys didn't win a
game until Smith was back in the lineup.
|
9.867 | | GWEN::ASHE | Do you have to let it linger? | Thu Nov 11 1993 13:57 | 3 |
| I would too.... and maybe Sanders over either one... but I admit my
bias there...
|
9.868 | Sanders walks? | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 11 1993 14:03 | 6 |
| Walt,
Speaking of Sanders, is he gonna walk out this week or not? The rumor is
that he'll pull a no show at the practice as Detroit has a bye this week.
TTom
|
9.869 | | GWEN::ASHE | Do you have to let it linger? | Thu Nov 11 1993 14:07 | 2 |
| Don't know, haven't heard...
|
9.870 | Haw Haw! | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Nov 11 1993 14:35 | 15 |
| <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 9.865 The National Football League (NFL) 865 of 869
CNTROL::CHILDS "I am airless, a vacuum child" 10 lines 11-NOV-1993 13:05
-< I like Bettis over Mirer too... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Betchya scraped some enamel off yo' teeth typin' this in, eh wot?
MikeL
|
9.871 | Aikman's Deserving | DYPSS1::ROPER | MAC IS BACK! | Thu Nov 11 1993 14:42 | 13 |
| Aikman is an obvious choice at this juncture for MVP IMO. True, Dallas
didn't win a game until Smith came back, but that was more due to the
emotional turmoil caused by his holdout than anything else.
All one has to do is examine Aikman's numbers for the first half of the
season. He's on an awesome pace so far. I read or heard from some
reporter last week that over the last 25 or so games Aikman's put
together a streak that's hard to match by any QB in NFL history. Face
it, the man's hot. Certainly not to downplay Smith's contribution to
the Cowboys, or Sander's to the Lions. BTW, Aikman's QB rating is over
100 thus far in the year.
- Bob
|
9.872 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 11 1993 14:54 | 6 |
| > True, Dallas didn't win a game until Smith came back, but that
> was more due to the emotional turmoil caused by his holdout
got any more of thjat stuff you must be smoking????
The Crazy Met
|
9.873 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | MAC IS BACK! | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:00 | 13 |
| re .872
TCM, did you watch the Buffalo game? That was a pitifully played game
by Dallas. One that they easily could've won without Emmit. The
players said so afterwards. Most players felt Smith's physical
absence didn't affect the team as much as the bickering, constant media
attention focused on Smith, etc.
HTH's,
Bob
|
9.874 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:23 | 2 |
|
naw...I always liked Bettis just hated that he did it for ND......
|
9.875 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:30 | 6 |
| �but that was more due to the
� emotional turmoil caused by his holdout than anything else.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Just like all those shining happy people in the
Red Sox dugout helped them improve immensely over their last place
finish in 1992.
|
9.876 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | MAC IS BACK! | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:38 | 4 |
| Hey! You guys are starting to make me feel silly over my "emotional
turmoil" remark. I resemble that!
- Bob
|
9.877 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:42 | 12 |
| >
> Hey! You guys are starting to make me feel silly over my "emotional
> turmoil" remark. I resemble that!
>
I'd be careful about feeling silly too, there Bob. Some of the folks
on the "Jerky Boys" CD are "silly", and I wouldn't wanna be like them.
Folks might start calling you "sizzle-chest".....8^)
'Saw
|
9.878 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:51 | 2 |
| Sorry, Bob, but I've never bought the argument that peace & happiness
can replace 100 yards/game or 30HR/100RBI, etc.
|
9.879 | and I think Emmitt's awsome... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:53 | 8 |
| He no one can say that Dallas would be dallas without emmitt, but look
at the numbers, Emmitt isnt even the highest rating RB at this point.
He doesnt lead in yrds, td, or avg so why would he be MVP to this point
in the season. Aikman gets my nod over Emmitt, not that dallas will go
to far without either of them, but Emmitt can be replaced more readily
then Aikman...(IMHO).
Mab
|
9.880 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:54 | 7 |
| not into that touchy feely stuff,huh Mac :-)
actually all you need to do is look at the 1972-1974 Oakland A's. They
fought with each other, some of 'em hated each other and they still
won 3 consecutive WS titles.
The Crazy Met
|
9.881 | (8^) | PFSVAX::JACOB | Gonna show her my ding-dong | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:54 | 11 |
|
>>Jake, now that Kosar has left the Almost Football Conference Central
>>Division you can cut the skirt-wearing stuff. He is now a member of
>>the manly Cowboys and no longer a Brown. :)
He's got a whole line of blue-whiteand silver dresses, hot pants, and
strapless gowns lined up for his Dall-Ass debut. Plus, he'll be the
boy toy in the locker room.
JaKe
|
9.882 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:56 | 6 |
| re: .879
Pro-rate his yards and TD by how many games he has played. You'll get
a different, more realistic ranting that way.
The Crazy Met
|
9.883 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:57 | 9 |
| � He no one can say that Dallas would be dallas without emmitt, but look
� at the numbers, Emmitt isnt even the highest rating RB at this point.
� He doesnt lead in yrds, td, or avg
Of course he doesn't lead in things like yards and TDs. He missed the
first two weeks of the season.
The V in MVP stands for valuable. The Cowboys are 0-2 without Emmit
and 6-0 with him. I see some value there.
|
9.884 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 11 1993 15:58 | 2 |
| First Bonds, now Kosar. You Pittsburghers really do need to learn how
to let go.
|
9.885 | Emmitt has done a GREAT job, no question | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:01 | 14 |
| There not looking at 4 games, there looking at the first 1/2 of the
season. I agree Emmitt's #'s considering that he missed 2 games are
pretty darn GREAT. But hey its not the league or teams fault that he
missed those 2 games so why whould they be over looked, the league is
1/2 way thru the season and emmitt has x, yrds, y tds on z carries.
Thats it, no well he missed this or that, just the raw #'s and W/L.
Emmitt hasnt lost a game yet this season, but no one's going to call
it a perfect season ....
Funny thing is that the first game VS washington, emmitt may not have
made a difference in the W/L but the 2nd game would have been alot
different with emmitt in there....Oh well...
MaB
|
9.886 | | MKFSA::LONG | Help! I've lost my OBL and can't get up! | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:02 | 1 |
| Hey Mac, Do Bonds, Kosar, then yourself!
|
9.887 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:03 | 5 |
| > Hey Mac, Do Bonds, Kosar, then yourself!
billl, you should be ashamed of yourself for stealing JaKe's response :-)
The Crazy Met
|
9.888 | Most Vaulable, not 2nd or 3rd most valuable... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:05 | 9 |
| Plus who's more valuable for the 1st 8 games, a QB who was there
for training camp and played all 8 games or a RB who sat out the
first 2 games for more $$$ causing a lesser team to be feilded and
causing off field controversy and diversion for the team.
If you said right now, your a Franchise owner and you can have either
Troy Aikman for the whole season or Emmitt for 14 games who would you
chose....
mab
|
9.889 | My take on the Cowboys and Emmitt | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:06 | 35 |
| >> <<< Note 9.875 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Just like all those shining happy people in the
Regarding Dallas' loss to Buffalo.
As I recall, Lin Elliott missed two field goals in that game. Do you
think he would have made them if Smith had been playing? And had
he made just one of them, Dallas would have probably went for the
game winning field goal in the closing minutes of the game rather
than trying for a TD.
The way I see it, Dallas would have probably won that game if they
had picked up Eddie Murray one week earlier. I'm not saying that
Murray has had the impact on the 'boys that Smith has, but look
at the first few games they won this year. Murray was kicking
3 or 4 field goals a game. Even against Philadelphia his kicking
made a big difference.
Against Washington, I don't think anybody could have made a difference
there. The Cowboys just plain old got their butts whipped. In
particular, their defense stunk up the joint.
Having Emmitt in the line up has made a hell of a difference, but other parts
of the team was breaking down that had nothing to do with Emmit. He
doesn't return punts, kick field goals or play defense. It seems that
all of those factions have improved since he returned. To say that
Emmitt's late signing didn't have an negative impact on team morale and
generate a lot of distraction is to ignore the facts. The Cowboys
are back on track now partly because Smith is back and playing great,
and partly because morale is up and distraction is down.
Just my humble opinion, of course.
Jerry
|
9.890 | LDUC alert | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:06 | 3 |
|
The Crazy Met
|
9.891 | not acting | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:08 | 14 |
| Emmit is leading the league in most categories if'n you look at it as
production per game.
He's averaging 110+ yards a game, 1 TD a game and a league leading 5.2
yards per rush attempt. As comparison, Barry Sanders is averaging
slightly less per game, a half a TD a game and a rushing average of 4.7
yards per attempt.
The kick in the pants for Dallas is that if Jones hadn't a been such a
butthead about this, the Cowboys may have gone undefeated for the year.
By all accounts, Jones aint learned his lesson yet. He's still acting
stupid about re-signing Aikman.
TTom
|
9.892 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:10 | 14 |
| �the league is
� 1/2 way thru the season and emmitt has x, yrds, y tds on z carries.
� Thats it, no well he missed this or that, just the raw #'s and W/L.
In case you haven't noticed, raw numbers rarely decide MVP. Like I
said before, V is for Valuable. This is not the BP (Best Player).
� Emmitt hasnt lost a game yet this season, but no one's going to call
� it a perfect season ....
Who is calling it a perfect season? Doesn't the fact that with Emmitt
in the game the Cowboys haven't lost tell you something about his
value? The Cowboys are 5-2 with Aikman and 1-0 without (if you count
the Giants game as without Troy).
|
9.893 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:11 | 5 |
| undefeated?? long shot, especially in that division.
When Dallas went 1-15 a few years back, remember the one game they won?
They beat Washington in Washington.
The Crazy Met
|
9.894 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:14 | 16 |
| �As I recall, Lin Elliott missed two field goals in that game. Do you
�think he would have made them if Smith had been playing?
Well if you buy the Emmitt's absence caused turmoil theory I guess
you'd have to say that if he was playing Elliott would have hit those
two field goals.
If you think that is a lot of bunk you'd have to say that Emmitt's 100+
yards would've had the 'Boys in position for a TD instead of having to
settle for FG attempts.
�their defense stunk up the joint.
A 100+ yard rusher keeps the defense off the field.
|
9.895 | Aikman has move weapons and options with the ball them emmitt | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:17 | 17 |
| Geezz.. He's not the 2nd coming... Look Emmitt is awsome Im just
saying without Aikman throwing arm and without Harper and Irvin
catching the ball emmitt gets less wholes less yardage and less
TD's. But the same goes the other way too, without Emmitt's excellent
running abililty Aikman would have less time to pass and the receivers
would not be open as much, this doesnt even take into account one of
the best TE's in the league as well. They all help each other, but
bottom line no Aikman, then Harper, Irvin and Novecek become less
valuable and emmitt gets more attention paid to him....
Mab
Plus they played washington and buffalo, granted washington has
since takin the big plunge but after week 1 many felt washington
was going to make a comeback, obviously week 1's performance was
a fluke (in a good way for washington) and a fluke (In a bad way
for dallas).
|
9.896 | (8^) | PFSVAX::JACOB | Gonna show her my ding-dong | Thu Nov 11 1993 16:18 | 18 |
| Hey MtM,
Go take a rugby ball(do they call it a ball in rugby?? ya know, they
call the field the "pitch" when nobody at all pitches in the game, )
stick it where the sun don't shine......
I cain dislike whatever freakin' player I want to dislike, and that's
the prerogative of any fan in any sport. That's what makes following
sports fun, deciding who to hate and who to love and who not to give
two good sh_ts about, ain't it.
SO what if'n I hate the biggest example of brain death in baseball, and
the best cross-dressed player in football?????
(8^0
JaKe
|
9.897 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | MAC IS BACK! | Thu Nov 11 1993 17:21 | 10 |
| re .895
Mab, I believe you hit the nail on the proverbial head! It's definetly
a team game. Emmit Smith would be nowhere good as he is IMO, if Aikman
weren't back there pitching the ball. Defenses could key on the
running game. Same goes for Troy. Without Emmit, the defense doubles
up on the receivers, etc. The thing that makes the Cowboys offense the
best in the NFL is their diversity.
- Bob
|
9.898 | Beef Jerky? | DYPSS1::ROPER | MAC IS BACK! | Thu Nov 11 1993 17:25 | 16 |
| re .877
>>I'd be careful about feeling silly too, there Bob. Some of the folks
>>on the "Jerky Boys" CD are "silly", and I wouldn't wanna be like them.
>>Folks might start calling you "sizzle-chest".....8^)
>>'Saw
Huh? Color me lost. 'Saw, you're gonna have to explain to me the
"Jerky Boys", "Silliness", and while your at it the "sizzle-chest" part
too! I must be living in a cave. I've never heard of the "Jerky
Boys".
- Bob
|
9.899 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I am airless, a vacuum child | Fri Nov 12 1993 07:58 | 11 |
|
Sure blame Elliot because the Dallas Boytoy couldn't get it in the endzone
without Emitt. Aikman's stats are built on big yardage #'s and completions
not TD's. Sure seems to me the Sowboys are getting alot more 6's now that
Emitt's back....
Now if you want to consider Boytoy and Emitt make one another look good
than make the sam comparision between Barry Foster and Neil ODonnell?
9 td's almost 890 yards of total offense? Foster's my MVP......
mike
|
9.900 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Fri Nov 12 1993 09:20 | 13 |
| > Huh? Color me lost. 'Saw, you're gonna have to explain to me the
> "Jerky Boys", "Silliness", and while your at it the "sizzle-chest" part
> too! I must be living in a cave. I've never heard of the "Jerky
> Boys".
Jerky Boys are a comedy "act", that have a CD out. They answer want ads
and such over the phone, and record the calls. The stuff is hysterical.
Look for the CD in the comedy section of any record store....
You have to hear it....
'Saw
|
9.901 | | AKOCOA::J_RODOPOULOS | | Fri Nov 12 1993 11:12 | 7 |
| Guys, we're back to Russell-Chamberlain, Hakeem-Ewing rathole. Both
Emmitt and Aikman play vital roles and can not be compared since they
play different positions.
John "D Cowboys" R.
BTW, I'd take Hakeem over Ewing.
|
9.902 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 12 1993 11:35 | 4 |
| With Smith 6-0
Without Smith 0-2
With Aikman 5-2
Without Aikman 1-0
|
9.903 | | GWEN::ASHE | Les Nessman Live, from the mall... | Fri Nov 12 1993 12:42 | 1 |
| When were they without Aikman? He threw for 2 TD's before he got hurt.
|
9.904 | Rathole | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Nov 12 1993 13:01 | 5 |
| YEs but what's Dallas record with smith playing when aikman does not
play at all :-). Emmitt is 6-0 with Aikman/Irvin/Harper/Novecek all
playing...
MaB
|
9.905 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 12 1993 13:19 | 9 |
| � When were they without Aikman? He threw for 2 TD's before he got hurt.
I counted the Giants game as a game without Aikman. The 'Boys didn't
skip a beat when he went down.
�Emmitt is 6-0 with Aikman/Irvin/Harper/Novecek all
� playing...
Yeah, and Aikman & Co. are 0-2 without Emmitt playing.
|
9.906 | | GWEN::ASHE | Les Nessman Live, from the mall... | Fri Nov 12 1993 13:41 | 2 |
| Because they cruised with a lead he gave them... right? That 50 yarder
to Harper took a lot of wind out of their sails...
|
9.907 | Dallas needs all there players to be great | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Nov 12 1993 13:54 | 23 |
| The game was won when Aikman went out.. the Giants scored 9pts, Aikman
throw 2 TD's so if anything it made no difference on the outcome,
except they fed Emmitt the rest of the game to run the clock down. And
this just add's to why emmitt has such great #'s. If Aikman hadnt
thrown the 2 TD's to give Dallas the Lead they wouldnt have been
running the ball so much at the end of the game. And if Dallas Defense
doesnt stop the opponents it would force Dallas to go to the air more
thus taking away from Emmitt's #'s. So yes emmitt is a big part of
there team but take away the OL and Emmitt goes Nowhere (NO hole's no
protection) Take away the Defense and Dallas plays catchup therefore
going to the air more. take away the QB or WR's and the Defense's all
focus on Emmitt.....
Emmitt is the Man (at the RB spot), Id say he's the #1 or #2, with the
question still out on weather Barry Sandars is the best pure RB in the
League. Thurman still appears to be the best all around back...
Thurman has 5 100yrd games out of 8 with 780+yrds (Im missing week9
but know he went over 100) plus he has 22+receptions for 182+yrds.
This is a slow year by Thurman's standards but he's still all around
great. Im not sure what the 3 have done on turnovers to date...
MaB
|
9.908 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NewJoisey-WeMindVeryMuchIfYouVote... | Fri Nov 12 1993 14:02 | 5 |
| The "real" MVP is the entire Dallas offensive line. They have more
pancakes than an IHOP on a busy morning. Course giving due to fat guys
like Newton and Gogan is marketing suicide.
/Don
|
9.909 | sorting it out | HBAHBA::HAAS | No sir. I don't like it. | Fri Nov 12 1993 14:05 | 5 |
| re: Newton and Gogan.
Was it ever decided if'n either of these could box 2 rounds?
TTom
|
9.910 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Nov 12 1993 15:13 | 2 |
| So, if the offensive line is that good, why couldn't Emmitt's backup do
the job for the first two weeks?
|
9.911 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 15 1993 10:19 | 9 |
| So Bernie Kosar led the Cowboys to victory. I guess that cog Emmit
Smith had nothing to do with it. It musta been one of them great team
victories.
MaB has made me see the light. There is no such thing as a Most
Valuable Player in a team sport. I think Michael Jordan should give
all of those MVPs back to the NBA and acknowledge the fact that if it
weren't for guys like James Edwards and BJ Armstrong he wouldn't be
where he is today.
|
9.912 | KEEP ON ROLLING... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 15 1993 15:19 | 18 |
| -1, please be realistic. Emmitt has not proven that the team cannot
win without him (sorry). Chicago did prove they couldnt win without
Michael and there's only 4 other guys in BBall to pick up the slack.
And honestly without Kosar I think the Boys would have lost this game.
But more importantly if the Defense Didnt Shutdown Phoenix dallas would
have lost this game.
I guess those 4 receptions for 102 yrds could have come from any QB
in the leauge ???? Granted the 63yrd reception was awsome tackle
breaking by Emmitt and nothing to do with the QB.....
I guess Buffalo would have definatly beat the NYG in there first
SB if Thomas had not lost his helmet, seeing that Buffalo with Thurman
beat the giants :-) :-) :-) (this is using Emmitt=WIN for Dallas
theory)
mab
|
9.913 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Nov 15 1993 16:18 | 28 |
| � -1, please be realistic. Emmitt has not proven that the team cannot
� win without him (sorry).
How many games did the Cowboys win while Smith was holding out?
�Chicago did prove they couldnt win without
� Michael and there's only 4 other guys in BBall to pick up the slack.
When? I know they proved they couldn't win with him and an
inexperienced/mediocre supporting cast.
� And honestly without Kosar I think the Boys would have lost this game.
So know Bernie Kosar, a backup QB released by the Cleveland Browns, is
more valuable than Emmitt Smith.
� I guess those 4 receptions for 102 yrds could have come from any QB
� in the leauge ???? Granted the 63yrd reception was awsome tackle
� breaking by Emmitt and nothing to do with the QB.....
So that leaves 3 receptions for 69 yards. Tony Eason put up those kind
of numbers and he's out of football.
� But more importantly if the Defense Didnt Shutdown Phoenix dallas would
� have lost this game.
Wow, they shut down the offense of the mighty Phoenix Cardinals.
|
9.914 | Anyone got a rule book handy? | MKFSA::LONG | Help! I've lost my OBL and can't get up! | Sat Nov 27 1993 19:43 | 21 |
| I've got a question for all you knowledgeable fans regarding the fiasco
in the Miami-Dallas game.
If Lett had not touched to ball and a Miami player dived on the ball
would it not have been first down Miami anyway? I'm pretty sure that
it had crossed the first down marker after it was blocked.
Here's the way I recall the rules. If a field goal attempt is blocked
either team can recover the ball. That is the offense can recover (but
not advance) the ball. If the attempt was tried on fourth down and the
ball does not cross the point which the kicking team need to get to in
order to get a first down, when recovered by the kicking team, it is
first and ten for the non-kicking team. If the defense recovers then
it is first and ten regardless of where it is.
If the above is true then Miami could have jumped on the ball even if
Lett does not touch it. Therefore Lett made a "heads-up" play, but
just didn't execute it very well.
billl
|
9.915 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Sat Nov 27 1993 21:06 | 9 |
| Slightly off there billl.
If the kicking team gets to the ball first then the team on defense gets the
ball - not sure where but no worse than their own 20 yard line.
If the defense recovers the ball they can advance it, however once the defense
touches it BOTH teams can advance the ball which is what happened in the
Miam-Dallas game on TG.
The Crazy Met
|
9.916 | FG | ROCK::MURPHY | The two Lous | Mon Nov 29 1993 01:11 | 18 |
| If the ball is "recovered" by the kicking team after a block -
BEHIND the line of scrimmage, the kicking team can try to advance
it. If they touch it past the line of scrimmage, the ball is spotted
at the 20 or original line of scrimmage, whichever is better for
the defending team.
Once Lett touched the ball before it was blown dead (by stopping
or downed by Miami) it became a live ball.
Another scenario - FG blocked, recovered by kicking team, kicking
team tries, to advance ball, runner is subjected to a face mask.
15 yd. penalty against the defense, automatic first down - possession
had never changed yet. Happened this weekend to BU's benefit - if UNI
had just tackled the man with no foul, they get the ball back.
BU scored the winner two plays later.
Murph
|
9.917 | | 7806::ASHE | What happened to Oran Juice Jones? | Mon Nov 29 1993 09:27 | 3 |
| Right... after the ball goes past the line of scrimmage, the kicking
team can't get possession or advance it unless the receiving team
touches it. Like a tipped punt, same thing...
|
9.918 | | MKFSA::LONG | Help! I've lost my OBL and can't get up! | Mon Nov 29 1993 10:05 | 11 |
| Okay...there was no way I was going to believe TC*, but if Sir Walter
says so, it must be so.
I guess I was just hoping that Lett was the only one thinking straight.
It does make sense, though, that if it is blocked/touched by the
defense at the line, then it would be recoverable by the offense.
But when did obscure rules like this ever make sense?
billl
|
9.919 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Elway for MVP? | Mon Nov 29 1993 12:13 | 1 |
| It's the same rules as for punting...
|
9.920 | Lett the rule be understood | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Nov 29 1993 15:34 | 9 |
| Several years ago the Eagles won a game in OT vs Giants when they ran
in a FG attempt that the Giants had blocked behind the line of
scrimmage.
The rule makes sense..otherwise you would invite scenarios of kickers
belting the ball at defensive players in the hope that the kicing team
can recover further downfield.
Didn't Oakland beat San Diego in the early 80' that way?
|
9.921 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Nov 29 1993 16:16 | 9 |
| >
> Didn't Oakland beat San Diego in the early 80' that way?
>
No, that was Stabler's famous "Forward Fumble"
'Saw
|
9.922 | what time they gonna do it? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:31 | 12 |
|
Yabbut just to keep ya appraised of what's happening, today's the
day that the NFL announces who gets the expansion team. I think St.
Loooee, Baltimore and someplace in Florida are the main contendah's.
hth
I remain,
<witty remark goes here>
Kev
|
9.923 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:52 | 6 |
| Just whats needed, another florida team. Baltimore don't need one
either. There are enough teams in the north-east area. Memphis is
better geographically, but market wise is questionable, and St. louuy
will get the hapless Pats....
Tim
|
9.924 | Headline said that Jacksonville | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 10:57 | 0 |
9.925 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 11:32 | 4 |
| that Jacksonville what, bob?
Baltimore is also trying for a CFL franchise. Someone in that city
wants some kind of football bad.
|
9.926 | Baltimore Rams? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Schlegelian Dialectic | Tue Nov 30 1993 11:34 | 3 |
| The latest rumor on Baltimore is that the LA Rams are gonna move there.
TTom
|
9.927 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | John Elway is so YUMMY!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 12:29 | 8 |
|
>>Baltimore is also trying for a CFL franchise. Someone in that city
>>wants some kind of football bad.
OR, some kind of BAD football.
JaKe
|
9.928 | The paper said that Jacksonville is now the frontrunner | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:08 | 1 |
| &%&&^( new PC...
|
9.929 | | 7806::ASHE | What happened to Oran Juice Jones? | Tue Nov 30 1993 14:53 | 2 |
| No annoucement yet...
|
9.930 | Jville announced | HBAHBA::HAAS | Schlegelian Dialectic | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:20 | 4 |
| Some guy from Jacksonville is up at the podium and thanking everyone,
looking like he done won something.
TTom
|
9.931 | confirmed - Jacksonville | CSTEAM::FARLEY | Carol's wearing maternity clothes | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:24 | 8 |
|
Yabbut my SKYPager news report just came in - indeed, Jacksonville
got the franchise.
I remain,
wondering about the Pats now....
Kev
|
9.932 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:27 | 5 |
| � I remain,
� wondering about the Pats now....
The owners of the stadium have been saying they will make life very
expensive and miserable for Orthwein if he tries to break the lease..
|
9.933 | fishy? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Schlegelian Dialectic | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:50 | 11 |
| Just like the lasted announcement stunk of a fix for St. Louis, this
announcement has its own odor.
Could this be the setup for:
o the Pats, lease and landlord notwithstanding, could be headed
to St. Louis?
o the Rams headed to Baltimore?
TTom
|
9.934 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 16:55 | 5 |
|
� The owners of the stadium have been saying they will make life very
� expensive and miserable for Orthwein if he tries to break the lease..
Yea Mac, and my mommy promised Santa would bring me a pony thised year.
|
9.936 | | DECWET::METZGER | America's most beloved game show host | Tue Nov 30 1993 17:01 | 30 |
|
As stated before the NFL will not let one of their largest media market go
without a team....
I'm suprised. I thought St Louis was a total lock. The team they have in place
must really be a bunch of bufoons to blow this opportunity.
The only great conspiracy scenario I see now is Pat to St Louis, Rams to
Baltimore and then immediate expansion of the league to include a new New
England and LA franchise (with the pats getting a new stadium as part of the
admission fee)
BTW - the CFL grey cup was played this past weekend and it was a more exciting
game than anything put on by the NFL. The semifinals were even better, played
in below zero temps with several running backs getting frostbite and telling
the coach not to hand the ball off to them because they couldn't feel it...
I think the NFl should adopt 2 CFL rules. Lengthen the end zone by 10 more
yards so it would be 20 yards deep preventing defenses from playing a 7 man
zone inside the 10 and using the back of the end zone to defense the pass. It
would boost the scoring troubles teams are having inside hte 20 and lenghten
field goals by 10 yards to boot....
With that...make all kickoffs and punts mandatorily returned. If the kick
return team doesn't get out of the end zone give the kickers 1 point. There is
nothing more boring than seeing all the downed in the end zone kick returns
this year....
Metz
|
9.937 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 17:16 | 1 |
| Hey =bob, that wasn't a wet blanket one-liner back there, was it?
|
9.938 | I'm convinced; I think they're gone... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 30 1993 17:17 | 31 |
|
> I'm suprised. I thought St Louis was a total lock. The team they have in place
> must really be a bunch of bufoons to blow this opportunity.
It all boils down to Orthwein being the money guy behind the St. Louis
bid at the same time that he was the owner of the Patriots. If he
doesn't like the terms of the expansion deal, then he walks, which he
did. I think all this business of a falling-out between Orthwein and
the rest of the St. Louis management team a couple of months ago was a
big smokescreen around the real issue which is the fact that Orthwein
didn't like the deal, both on the St. Louis end and on the sale of the
Patriots. Orthwein had the money which meant he had the power behind
the St. Louis team, which means that even if there were disagreements
with the lesser parties he was the guy in charge. Instead, he just
packed up and left.
> As stated before the NFL will not let one of their largest media market go
> without a team....
I really am afraid that the Pats are history in New England. Look for
expansion in the next go-round but only if Massachusetts bends over
with the Megaplex (it's not going to happen in the time it takes to
pack up a couple of Mayflowers). Fact is, we can talk all we want about
the size of the market, but with the current situation with the lousy
stadium deal and the lousy team and the lousy ratings (when the team
isn't blacked out altogether), the Pats aren't making big money for the
NFL and haven't for years. There's always that "potential", but perhaps
the other owners just got sick of it all...
glenn
|
9.939 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Nov 30 1993 17:20 | 5 |
| � I really am afraid that the Pats are history in New England. Look for
� expansion in the next go-round but only if Massachusetts bends over
� with the Megaplex
Connecticut has already said they'd bend over.
|
9.940 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Tue Nov 30 1993 17:21 | 5 |
| I'm not the bitter sort. I wish the good folks of St. Louis the
same luck this storied franchise has had since its inception. And I
sincerely mean that!
/Don
|
9.941 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Tue Nov 30 1993 18:32 | 8 |
| In the "American Football Conference" somone said that the new
florida team colors are dark blue and gold. Just what we need, more
dark colored unis. At least it taint black, but dark blue like
michigan is close enough.
Need other colors...Howwa bout some pastels (-)
Tim
|
9.942 | good one | 16421::HEISER | but I *like* it!!! | Tue Nov 30 1993 23:01 | 1 |
| /Slasher, that one was a piece of work!
|
9.944 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Wed Dec 01 1993 09:06 | 13 |
| The chances of Connecticut getting the Patriots are about the same as me
winning the Olympic 100 meters in the nexted Olympics -- slim and none, and
slim just walked out the door.
Since Day 1 I thought the idea totally ludicrous, and if it happens I'll
dump a steamy one in a corner and eat it.
The big thing is that that Pats NEED a NEW stadium. It's the laughing stock
of the league,....
'Saw
|
9.945 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Wed Dec 01 1993 09:36 | 17 |
| The Conn. deal for the Pats was based on the ultimate "Conn" man Fran Murray
buying the team. Murray has proven that without big bucks behind him, he has
a hard timing buying a Dove bar at the local Cumberland Farms.
As far as the stadium is concerned, while the cement structure in Foxboro may
not be the best, it is far from the dump it is portrayed to be. The problem is
that the Pats don't own it, and in fact have a standard business deal type
contract on it. The various owners ahve whined ever since this happened that
the state and city of Boston should drop it's draws and grap its collective
ankles for them, and build a megaplex. As any of us who know Massachusetts
politics knows, this will happen about the time that Saw dines on that steamy
pile.
Of course Slasher, you know that the cheerleaders will still perform every other
Sunday, even if the Pats move...
=Bob=
|
9.946 | | 7806::ASHE | What happened to Oran Juice Jones? | Wed Dec 01 1993 09:50 | 2 |
| Yeah, more like the Oakland Invaders or UCLA type jerseys...
|
9.947 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:46 | 3 |
| This morning I heard another rumor of a team moving. The Cincinnati
Bengals have now joined the list of teams that could move to one of the
losers of the expansion sweepstakes.
|
9.949 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:15 | 11 |
| RE: Cincinnati
Yup Mike Brown tried to scare the folks here, in Cincy, but threatening
a move. They have recently decided to refurb Riverfront and the
Bengals have signed a contract to stay until 2000.
I think you must have heard an old rumor.
Live from the '93 most live-able city in North America...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.950 | Perhaps the NFL will fight again... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:24 | 33 |
|
>> There's always that "potential", but perhaps the other owners
>> just got sick of it all...
>
> I honestly don't see what the Pats record or tv ratings have to do with
> who gets a new franchise. What's more is that I think the Pats have only
> failed to sell out one game this year. And that one was close to a sell
> out. There is support for the team up here although I agree, they look
> like they're gone.
It's not the biggest consideration, but I think the owners had to be
aware of the consequences of their decision, and the fate of the NE
franchise ranks right up there. That much was evident when the topic
came up at the press conference and Tagliabue made his official
proclamation. It's obvious that the NFL really did want to put that
expansion team in St. Louis to clear up a lot of problems, and gave
them all sorts of preferential treatment to get it done, but St. Louis
couldn't come through.
All things considered, the strength of that statement that the Patriots
would not be going anywhere per the NFL's agreement with Orthwein is
encouraging. At least the NFL *might* be willing to fight. But there
are still unanswered questions: why did Orthwein pull out of the St.
Louis team when he stood to be a hero in his hometown and according to
most reports all along acquire a license to print money with a sweetheart
stadium deal that would be there, if he did not have an even better deal
available to him? And why is Orthwein's "financial adviser" continuing
to publicly say, almost in bold defiance to questions demanding whether
bids from other cities would be considered, that any and all offers will
be looked at? This matter isn't closed...
glenn
|
9.951 | New team and possible re-alignment | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:39 | 132 |
|
[email protected] articles by Nov 29-30, 1993:
--------
Subject: Jacksonville awarded expansion team
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 18:21:33 PST
ROSEMONT, Ill. (UPI) -- The National Football League Tuesday bypassed
the chance to re-link itself with the past and moved again into the
expanding markets of the New South by awarding a franchise to the city
of Jacksonville, Fla.
Jacksonville was seemingly only an afterthought a month ago, but
emerged as the overwhelming choice to receive the NFL's 30th team.
League owners approved the new franchise by a 26-2 vote.
St. Louis, which lost an NFL team when the Cardinals moved to Phoenix
in 1988, had been a heavy favorite to win a new franchise last month.
But squabbling among would-be ownership groups and the possibility of
future lawsuits caused the NFL to look elsewhere.
The NFL owners chose Jacksonville despite its proximity to the
league's other new team -- the Carolina Cougars.
``There's a very strong feeling that Jacksonville is a hotbed of
football interest,'' NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue said in announcing
the decision.
``It's in a part of the country that has a tremendous interest in
football and in the NFL. Even with the fact that the other franchise
went to Charlotte, there was a feeling that the NFL was under-
represented in the southeast part of the country. Jacksonville provides
a very strong base for the National Football League in that area.''
The Carolina Cougars and Jacksonville Jaguars will both begin play in
1995, with an expansion draft and possible re-alignment facing the
league during the next two years.
In addition to St. Louis, the cities of Baltimore and Memphis had
made bids for a new team. But the Jacksonville ownership group headed by
J. Wayne Weaver prevailed, thanks in part to a large season-ticket
commitment already made by football fans in his town.
``The decision that the NFL made here today will make you proud,''
Weaver told Tagliabue. ``We will be a great new partner for the NFL.''
The announcement touched off waves of celebration in Jacksonville and
came as a shock to those who had supported the St. Louis effort.
``We've lived this dream for 15 years,'' said former Jacksonville
mayor Jake Godbolt, who started his city's bid for a team. ``I feel so
elated, I feel so warm, I feel so good. This is a wonderful moment.
``We're not talking about crime, we're not talking about kids getting
in trouble, we're talking about something really happy, and God knows,
Jacksonville deserves this moment of happiness.''
Jacksonville has an existing facility in the 70,000-plus Gator Bowl,
but is the smallest television market of the five candidates, ranking
56th in the nation. The new group plans to invest $120 million to
renovate the stadium and Tagliabue said the Jacksonville television
market, though small, is one of the fastest growing in the country.
Weaver's partners Jeb Bush, son of former President George Bush;
Jacksonville business executive Thomas Petway III; and former NFL
defensive back Deron Cherry.
``It's the beginning of a new era,'' Weaver said. ``This takes a
middle market city and takes it to a new level. We're going to have the
biggest celebration you have ever seen, beginning tonight.''
A new ownership application for a potential Baltimore franchise was
submitted by Al Lerner during the past month. Lerner joined two other
groups vying for a franchise in Baltimore. One group was headed by
billionaire investor Malcolm Glazer and the other by Leonard ``Boogie''
Weinglass.
``We worked for this for two solid years,'' Glazer lamented. ``We did
everything we had to do....I'm just practically ready to start crying.''
The St. Louis group, which was headed by Stanley Kroenke, also
submitted new documentation during the past month. The investment group
had been headed by Jerry Clinton, but he withdrew and Kroenke took over
the leadership of the St. Louis entry. Former Chicago Bears star Walter
Payton, the all-time leading rusher in NFL history, was also a member of
the St. Louis group.
``It's shocking, to say the least, that Jacksonville was selected
over St. Louis,'' Clinton said. ``I know that our market demographics
are much better than Jacksonville's. I'm at a loss for words.''
``It's sort of like you've been knocked out and people are talking to
you...(but) you don't comprehend,'' Payton said.
The new clubs will pay approximately $140 million to join the NFL for
the 1995 season.
Jacksonville previously fielded franchises in the World Football
League and the United States Football League. The city nearly had NFL
football four times in the past.
Robert Irsay considered moving the Colts from Baltimore before
relocating in Indianapolis, the New Orleans Saints came close to moving
to Jacksonville before the team was sold to local investor Tom Benson,
and both the Houston Oilers and Atlanta Falcons have made overtures to
Jacksonville.
Charlotte's team will be called the Carolina Panthers. The chief
investor is former NFL player Jerry Richardson, who heads the highly
successful Flagstar Companies food service chain. Charlotte investors
plan to build a 72,000-seat stadium.
--------
Subject: NFL re-alignment on the horizon
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 18:21:33 PST
The awarding of NFL franchises to Charlotte, N.C., and Jacksonville,
Fla., almost automatically means at least moderate re-alignment within
pro football.
And, as it has in the past, the moving of teams from one division to
another could mean as much debate as there was over the selecting of the
new franchises.
With 30 teams, the NFL becomes perfectly balanced with six divisions
of five teams each. But there is little chance the new teams will be
neatly fitted into the existing four-team divisions -- the AFC Central
and NFC West.
To do so would mean putting one of the new teams in a division with
Pittsburgh, Houston, Cincinnati and Cleveland and the other in a
division with Atlanta, New Orleans, the Los Angeles Rams and San
Francisco.
But there will be howls of protests from some owners if massive re-
alignment is attempted along strict geographical logic.
Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones has let it be known he will fight
any move to take his team out of a division that includes the high-
profile markets of New York, Philadelphia and Washington.
``I think it is generally understood within the league,'' Jones said,
``that no team will be forced to move if that team does not want to.''
Jones also said he rejects the argument that aligning teams
geographically mean large savings.
``The only difference in traveling to New York instead of Houston is
the jet fuel in the airplane,'' Jones said. ``And that is less than we
spend trying to sign one player on the practice squad.''
The biggest problem facing the league involves the NFC West. The
Atlanta Falcons would be a natural rival for the new teams and would be
a likely candidate to move from its present home. So would New Orleans.
But which teams take their place?
The Phoenix Cardinals would be one choice, but that still leaves two
other teams to go into the NFC West and one to take the place of Phoenix
in the NFC East.
It would be natural to have Charlotte, Jacksonville, Atlanta, Miami
and Tampa Bay in one division, but once that happens, large scale
juggling must take place elsewhere.
That will be the main trouble with re-alignment. Each change means
another change somewhere else. In the long run, the squabbles may be
more entertaining that the games themselves.
|
9.952 | St.Louis Reaction | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:40 | 72 |
| From: [email protected] (UPI)
Subject: St. Louis shocked by NFL snub
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 16:27:07 PST
ST. LOUIS (UPI) -- Plans for a celebration on the St. Louis riverfront
were shattered when National Football League Commissioner Paul Tagliabue
announced Tuesday that Jacksonville had been awarded an expansion
franchise.
The announcement stunned many St. Louis residents, who had considered
their city was the leading contender for the NFL's 30th team.
One of the strongest reactions came from Jerry Clinton, who had
headed the St. Louis NFL Partnership, a group that worked for some five
years to bring an expansion franchise to the city. Clinton's group
pulled out of the effort last month after being unable to put together
sufficient financial backing.
``It's shocking, to say the least, that Jacksonville was selected
over St. Louis,'' Clinton said in an interview with KMOX Radio. ``I know
that our market demographics are much better than Jacksonville's. I'm at
a loss for words.''
Also expressing disappointment was E. Stanley Kroenke, a shopping-
center developer from Columbia with marital ties to the Walton family of
Wal-Mart fame. Kroenke headed the Gateway NFL Partnership, the group
that took over the city's effort to win a franchise last month after the
St. Louis NFL Partnership pulled out.
``I'm a little surprised,'' Kroenke said in an interview with KMOX.
``I really thought we had an excellent chance. I just think that there
were some things that had to be overcome, and (Tagliabue) pointed out
that if we hadn't stepped in in those difficult circumstances five weeks
ago, St. Louis would have been gone then.''
Confusion over the city's attempts to win the franchise apparently
played a part in the NFL's decision. Along with the sometimes
conflicting efforts between the two ownership groups, league officials
may have been wary of possible litigation from entrepreneur Fran Murray.
Murray, formerly part-owner of the NFL's New England Patriots, was a
part of the St. Louis NFL Partnership. Some city and league officials
had expressed concerns that Murray might file suit if he was shut out of
the ownership group awarded a St. Louis franchise.
Also seen as hurting the city's chances were confusion over the lease
for a football team to play in the new domed stadium under construction
as an expansion of the Cervantes Convention Center downtown. The $260
million stadium is being built to hold 70,000 spectators for football
games. The lease still is held by the St. Louis NFL Partnership, which
reportedly had been unable to reach an agreement on the matter with the
Gateway NFL Partnership.
Plans for an evening celebration and fireworks on Laclede's Landing,
the city's historic entertainment district along the Mississippi River,
were scuttled by the announcement.
At sports bars throughout the city and surrounding areas, customers
were disappointed as Tagliabue's announcement was broadcast and owners
were disheartened as their plans for parties went down the drain.
``It's very depressing,'' said Bob Raaf, 47, owner of Schmiezing's in
midtown St. Louis. The bar is near the Arena, where the St. Louis Blues
of the National Hockey League play, and is a popular gathering place for
hockey and other sports fans.
``We stocked up with an extra load of beer today,'' Raaf said. He
said what he hoped would be a euphoric atmosphere in his bar fizzled
when the news was heard.
Customers at Schmiezing's also bemoaned the city's lost opportunity
to get a new franchise. St. Louis has been without professional football
since the Cardinals moved to Phoenix following the 1987 season.
``Personally, I wasn't surprised at all,'' said Bruce Heintz, 57, of
St. Louis. ``As a businessman in St. Louis, I realized we had blown an
opportunity with all of the screwing around.''
Like many other football fans in the city, Heintz said he was turning
his hopes to luring an existing NFL franchise to St. Louis. Most such
rumors have concerned the Patriots, which are owned by St. Louisan James
Busch Orthwein, who has family ties to the city's famous Anheuser-Busch
brewery.
|
9.953 | Jaksonville Reaction | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:40 | 59 |
| From: [email protected] (UPI)
Subject: Former mayor: ``I feel so warm. I feel so good''
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 16:27:07 PST
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (UPI) -- The darkhorse city of Jacksonville, once
an outsider in the race for an expansion NFL franchise, rejoiced Tuesday
when the northeast Florida city was awarded a team.
A pep rally and celebration was scheduled for the Gator Bowl at 4 p.
m. Wednesday and was planned to last well into the evening.
When customers were advised they would not be able to buy
commemorative T-shirts until they reached the stores Wednesday, hundreds
of them lined up at the manufacturer, Sportswear Express. They were
turned away because of contractual agreements.
``We've lived this dream for 15 years,'' rejoiced former Mayor Jake
Godbolt, who started the drive for the franchise. ``I feel so elated, I
feel so warm, I feel so good. This is a wonderful moment.
``We're not talking about crime, we're not talking about kids getting
in trouble, we're talking about something really happy, and God knows,
Jacksonville deserves this moment of happiness.''
Jacksonville and Charlotte, N.C., awarded a team last month, will
join the NFL in 1995 to form a 30-team league.
NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue announced the selection of
Jacksonville, which will be known as the Jaguars, after a meeting in
Rosemont, Ill. The investment group is headed by J. Wayne Weaver. The
group pulled out of the running for a franchise this year and then
announced it was back.
Jacksonville has an existing facility in the 70,000-plus Gator Bowl,
but is the smallest television market of the five candidates that had
been seeking a team. It ranks 54th in the nation in that department. The
new group plans to invest $120 million to renovate the stadium.
Weaver's partners include Jeb Bush, son of former President George
Bush; Jacksonville business executive Thomas Petway III; and former NFL
defensive back Deron Cherry.
Former Baseball Commissioner Bowie Kuhn, who lives in Jacksonville,
said he thinks the arrival of an NFL team will change the complexion of
the city.
``I think you can't say you're going to put Jacksonville on the map,
because it's been on the map in a big way,'' Kuhn said. ``But in a
major, major way, Jacksonville becomes a center that it has never been
before of national attention. It's going to mean a lot to business and
trade in this town.''
Lindy Infante, a former Green Bay Packers' coach, said he wasn't
surprised.
``Everybody said that this is an upset, but I really think the best
team won,'' he said. ``I never thought that Jacksonville would lose this
thing. A lot of people don't realize what a big shot in the arm for
Jacksonville this will be.''
Season tickets will go on sale Wednesday morning and range from $150
to $700. In an effort earlier this year to show the area would support
the team, the would-be franchise owners sold 10,000 club seats at $1,500
each in eight days.
``One of the reasons why we have this is because we sent a message to
the NFL that we would support the NFL,'' said Al Latimer, executive
director of the Jacksonville Sports Authority. ``It's time now to start
reaching for your wallet because we are going to count on that support.''
|
9.955 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:12 | 7 |
| �Lawsuits
� were obviously a bigger consideration than keeping the Pats in New
� England.
You don't think that moving the Pats will not create a bunch of
lawsuits? The owners of Foxborough Stadium probably have the papers
already drawn up.
|
9.956 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | All products 100% buzzword compliant | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:17 | 5 |
|
How about it the Rams moved to NE. That would solve all the ownership
problems.
brews
|
9.957 | even better idea | 16421::HEISER | but I *like* it!!! | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:38 | 1 |
| How about they move the Cards there and give us the Pats?
|
9.959 | I'm not sure the NFL still won't get the pants sued off it | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 01 1993 14:06 | 22 |
|
> Mac, this way the NFL won't be the plaintiff in any lawsuits.
This may indeed be the case, I just don't know the details, but why?
Okay, you've reportedly got some threats from a real small-time
operator like Fran Murray, but what about the bigger picture with the
cities themselves? A month ago Jacksonville was voluntarily pulling
out of the expansion running. If anything, it appears that they had
the least to lose by not getting a franchise. St. Louis has already
nearly completed a stadium and has a bundle at stake. Baltimore had
the plans and funding together to do so immediately as well as a
generally strong bid per the NFL requirements (they just weren't that
attractive as a city and media market in general, something the
expansion group had no control over). Both of these cities have lost
NFL franchises and were counting on getting one back. How does the
selection of Jacksonville leave the NFL with the best protection
against lawsuits from these cities as well as Memphis (another strong
bid and the favorite as replacement for St. Louis a month ago), the
potentially disastrous Patriots situation notwithstanding?
glenn
|
9.960 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 14:44 | 4 |
| � Mac, this way the NFL won't be the plaintiff in any lawsuits.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Kraft et.al. go after Orthwein AND the
NFL if the Pats were to move.
|
9.962 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,DanReeves | Wed Dec 01 1993 16:20 | 5 |
| I like the Fran Murray approach. I have no credibility, no money,
but if somebody doesn't make me a millionaire real fast, litigation
will follow. He's the embodiment of the "American Dream" 90's style.
/Don
|
9.963 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 01 1993 16:57 | 28 |
|
Tommy, you may be right about that. The selection of St. Louis could
definitely give rise to the contention that the entire process was
rigged. Then again, it's my personal belief that Baltimore can make
the same claim, that they were led on but were never really in
contention. I kept reading stuff about Baltimore like "they have
the money, they have the new stadium funding secured, they have the
most impressive and most stable proposal, but the NFL doesn't want
football back in that market so close to Washington and Philadelphia".
I suspect this was the reason that Jacksonville was "encouraged" to
hang in there when they were willingly tossing in their hand-- the NFL
needed that safety valve to the St. Louis proposal. I don't know if
these are justifiable grounds for a lawsuit or not, but then again the
"justifiable" part never seems to have much to do with it.
> I like the Fran Murray approach. I have no credibility, no money,
> but if somebody doesn't make me a millionaire real fast, litigation
> will follow. He's the embodiment of the "American Dream" 90's style.
Yeah, I know. This is the same guy who had half of Connecticut
woodward to starboard side and then upon the mere scent of sham
somewhere else, promptly declared that "Hartford is dead. St. Louis is
the deal". Why does anyone ever allow the bastard to put his signature
on anything resembling a legal document? Because he's some kind of
self-proclaimed "sports management expert"?
glenn
|
9.964 | Lasted one out of the NorthEastCorridor turn off the lights. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Dec 01 1993 16:58 | 9 |
| Awarding the franchise to yet another southern team is further evidence
of demographic trends and the migration to the south that's taking
place in the USA. Currently the SouthEast is the strongest region
economically, leading the country out of the recession. Trends point
to the population of Florida to continue to outpace the country, with
expected growth rates of around 36% over a 10 year period.
- ACC Chris
|
9.965 | Yeah, but Jax is still a dump... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 01 1993 16:59 | 1 |
|
|
9.966 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Dec 01 1993 17:20 | 18 |
| � Mac, the next time I miss a point will be the first.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHA
�I'm legitimately
� concerned about demographic trends and aim interested in how Waugamain
� can claim that the NFL is on a downward spiral despite sitting atop the
� polls as the number 1 SPORT in America.
Think of it this way. IBM is at the top of the heap in the computer
industry, yet they have been slipping in profit, earnings, and market
share. You can still be #1 while going down.
� Sounds to me like he's spouting at the mouth with no supporting
� evidence.
I realize that's a favorite tactic of yours, but Glenn does not behave
this way.
|
9.968 | Go ahead, Chris, igKnorr the trend, stick your head in the sand | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 01 1993 17:29 | 28 |
|
> Mac, the next time I miss a point will be the first. I'm legitimately
> concerned about demographic trends and aim interested in how Waugamain
> can claim that the NFL is on a downward spiral despite sitting atop the
> polls as the number 1 SPORT in America.
>
> Sounds to me like he's spouting at the mouth with no supporting
> evidence.
No, it's a fack: NFL TV ratings are again on the decline for something
like the 5th year in a row. You've got NBC making threats that they'll
pull out unless they get a whole lot better deal than this one, and
ABC is also hurting with the dreadful MNF as of late (CBS with the
better-quality, larger-market NFC games is doing better). You're
talking about the lifeblood of the enterprise here. Don't matter what
some cheap TV Guide poll says; the networks aren't happy with the
ratings, and the networks run the league. You can remain at #1 on
paper and at the same time be on the decline. It's just like with
baseball when they took their beating from TV at the same time they
were still #1 (and still are, I believe) in total revenues.
Of course none of this has anything to do with the original point that
the games have become boring recently regardless of whatever fan bases
may have been built up over the years, the exact same point that ACChris
has never failed to make in favor of college hoops (#16) over the NBA (#2).
glenn
|
9.967 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Melanie is one year old!!! | Wed Dec 01 1993 17:29 | 9 |
| Okay, say that there are lawsuits against Orthwhine (or whomever) about moving
a franchise to St. Louis (or wherever). Do you really think a judge could
prevent them from moving? If the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the
best that the judge would do is award them a huge cash settlement. To any group
with the Busch fortune in the background, money is no object.
This is what happens in American justice today.
And yes, Jax is a dump...
|
9.969 | | GENRAL::WADE | Pull! | Wed Dec 01 1993 17:53 | 8 |
|
glenn,
"Jax" is not a dump. "Jax" is the nastiest beer ever made!
It's made with the use of a flat rock and a few bovines somewhere
down south.
Claybone
|
9.970 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Wed Dec 01 1993 18:19 | 7 |
| Yeh, theres a real market down in Florida for the NFL. Just look at
how many games tampa sells out. It won't be different with 'ville
since they will be losers for the 1st 3-4 years or maybe like tampa,
the last 16 years.......... The fish don't even have the satdium
full that often...
Tim
|
9.971 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 02 1993 09:54 | 54 |
| Well, Tim, sounds like the Jaguars aren't having any trouble selling
tickets so far:
[email protected] articles by 1 Dec 93:
--------
Subject: Jaguars ticket sales overwhelm phones
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 93 16:20:02 PST
JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (UPI) -- The new Jacksonville Jaguars were forced
to add telephones in their ticket office Wednesday because of thousands
of season ticket requests that started coming in when the switchboard
opened at 7:30 a.m.
``We're very pleased and embarrassed and apologetic that our phone
lines are so difficult to get through on,'' said Jaguar President David
Seldin. ``That'a as a result of overwhelming demand. We're told that at
any one time, we have 2,000 to 3,000 people trying the line.''
Seldin said they have sold so many tickets for the $100 deposit, they
haven't had a chance to count them.
Callers have also asked about becoming team mascots and trying out as
players. One woman offered to run a contest to select the team's
cheerleaders.
There was speculation that Florida Gator Coach Steve Spurrier will be
considered to lead Jaguars, but Spurrier said he is happy coaching at
the University of Florida and plans to stay. His contract runs to the
year 2000.
Spurrier also has been mentioned as a candidate for the Charlotte
Panthers, the other expansion franchise which will begin play in 1995.
During the drive to get the expansion franchise, the city promised
$121 million renovation of the Gator Bowl.
During the construction, the annual Florida-Georgia game played in
the Gator Bowl will be played home and home.
The 1994 game will be played in Gainesville, the first time the
series has been played at Florida Field since 1931. It is possible early
1995 Jacksonville Jaguars' games will be played in Gainesville if the
Gator Bowl is still unfinished.
Team owners and officials, who were awarded the NFL expansion
franchise Tuesday, also spent the day planning for Wednesday night's
celebration in the Gator Bowl.
Tailgate parties began at 4 p.m. and the Gator Bowl stadium was to
open at 5:30 p.m., complete with a Jaguar logo in the end zone. Owner J.
Wayne Weaver and other officials were to arrive an hour later as
thousands packed the bowl.
Both Florida senators, Bob Graham and Connie Mack, also attended.
Weaver received an enthusiastic welcome from fans when he arrived at
Jacksonville International Airport Wednesday night after NFL
Commissioner Paul Tagliabue announced the team's selection.
About 200 fans were lined up outside one J.C. Penney store Wednesday
morning in search of Jaguars T-shirts.
Store manager Craig Carr said they had sold 2,000 shirts at that
store Tuesday night and expected to sell 10,000 more by Thursday. Sales
have been limited to two shirts per customer.
|
9.972 | No, here's the difference, about $40M worth... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Dec 02 1993 10:41 | 9 |
|
I think the Chicago Bulls are the biggest "Bought Team" of all time.
Look at all the money that ingrate Michael Jordan made after the team
became successful. Now if the Bulls had won some championships
with Matt Wenstrom in their starting lineup in place of Jordan, now
*that* would have been a "Championship Team".
glenn
|
9.973 | Bulls won with a team not with $$$$ | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 02 1993 11:04 | 41 |
| But Michael Jordan was no where near the highest paid player in the
NBA. These young "SO called studs" Are coming in making more then
jordan was ever paid by the NBA (or the bulls).
Hey everyone can think what they want but I have no respect for any
bought championship team. Dallas won it all with a middle to low
payroll. They built a championship team with talant, great coaching
and a great game plan. Once the cap kicks in and teams can no longer
buy a team and are forced to build them then theyll impress me. This
is just my opinion which shouldnt matter much. -1 where on earth do
you come up with 40M, take jordan's NBA salary for his whole carear and
you might come up with 40M...
Its hard to compare NBA with Football or baseball they can basically go
out and play for the highest bidders. Imagine what a jordan would be
worth with full free agency and no cap in basketball. There's
proberbly 5-10 teams in the NBA right now that if you add jordan there
an instant championship team. You cant really do that in Football or
Baseball. You have to go out and sign multiple free agents for big
bucks. SO without out a cap the teams in the bigger markets will win
a huge percentage of the time leaving the smaller market teams as
basement dwellers. Of course you can be in a big market and have a
stupid cheap front office for 20years and have as much success as the
pats :-). I cant wait to see some of these teams in 3 years or so
when they cant just go out and steal or resign 10 pro bowlers and
stay under the cap....
If money was no object I could build the pats in a year or too no
problem... you could even buy away some talant thats already under
contract if money was no issue. This will never impress me. Now if
Pittsburg goes all the way this year, It would be very impressive,
dont have have like one of the lowest payrolls :-).
Hey everyone has there own values, and anyone can jump on any bandwagon
they want. But the highest bidder wont earn my respect, a few
individuals on those teams deserve respect but the organization as
a whole.. Im not so sure... This is just my opinion and I like to
root for the underdog, hey Michael JOrdan retiring is great I can keep
rooting for the bulls but there instant underdogs and I no longer have
to worry about people thinking Im a band wagon jumper....
MairB
|
9.974 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Dead Runners Society - Carpe Viam | Thu Dec 02 1993 11:18 | 1 |
| they're their, Mair'
|
9.975 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Thu Dec 02 1993 11:25 | 18 |
| The best players are going to command the best bucks. Once a player
or team has proven it is championship caliber, the salaries are going to
go up.
It's just like anything else. If I produce the best chili, I can charge
more for it because people are willing to pay more for it. Just because
it costs more doesn't make it any less good.
Same thing with a championship team.
As for Jordan, he didn't need any more money from basketball anyway.
He was making more money than any human could reasonably need from his
other ventures. Hell, for all his money, he could have paid the Bulls
to let him play -- but I guess ol' Mikey didn't love the game enough to
do that.....
'Saw
|
9.976 | Wake up, M Air! Sell the shoes, win the champeenships... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Dec 02 1993 11:26 | 10 |
|
Yeah, so Jordan got paid right from the top by Nike et. al. instead
of on the books of that Nike subsidiary, the NBA. He still was
bought and paid for at $40M to continue to keep the Bulls afloat.
Real championships are won without the need for big-advertising-market
sneaker money! Now if the Milwaukee Bucks win the championship, my
values permit me to respect that...
glenn
|
9.978 | Wasted too much time on this topic already... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 02 1993 12:46 | 40 |
| Im glad people keep bringing up MJ. The Bulls went no where when
it was just MJ. And if MJ had demanded what he was worth they would
have never built the team they did. But Basketball has a cap and for
the most part you cant just go out and pay anyone anything to sign
them. Jordan even renegotiated for a lesser contract so they could
use that money to sign some other players (I beleive pippen). And I
cant get mad over a guy who signs for less money but then markets
himself get a good agent, marketing rep and money manager. Im shocked
when I see these ex sports people going bankrupt. 1 Million would set
me for life (If invested properly) I have no idea what these idiots
do with there money.
Im just glad there finally going to have a cap. I know some teams in
the NBA are finding ways around the cap but it does seem like it keeps
things down to earth. I think the cap is too high, but then again they
do play 82 games so if you pay them per game 4m in basketball is only
48Kper game where as 4M in football is 250K per game. Dallas will have
a hard time because player will compare themselves to other at there
position makeing x$ and want that much money. But with the cap you
cant pay emmitt, troy, Irvin and Norton a combined 10+mil and only have
20 mil for the rest of the team. It will be a rough process at start
but when agents, owner and players realize they cant have the huge
contract and success they'll start coming down to earth.
I think all sports players are over paid, its not all there faults the
owner were and are too greedy. Why should they make Millions and the
players get squat but I think its getting out of hand. 50players on
each team with a cap of 25M would be more then enough thats an avg of
31+K per game, pay the better players a little more and other's a
little less and put more money into pensions etc so they can live after
football.... But why cant a RB who gets bad knees after 5 years never
have to work a real job ? People always say oh they need more $$$
Because there carear's are so short. Lets see the average HARD working
man makes 35K a year times 40Years of work so roughly 1.5 M, and these
guys want twice that per year ? on average... Too much. Put caps on
all sports and keep the avg team salary at 500K to 1M per year per
player, anything more is too much... Oh well enough, Ive wasted enough
time on this topic... Bottom Line, you buy the best players and have
the #1 Payroll in any sport, you better win it all, otherwise your
wasting your money...
|
9.979 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Thu Dec 02 1993 12:53 | 8 |
|
I've got a few caps, baseball and hub.. Find 'em everywhere...
Had a few close calls gettin 'em too, stopping on the highway
like that....
|
9.980 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 02 1993 12:59 | 17 |
| �Jordan even renegotiated for a lesser contract so they could
� use that money to sign some other players (I beleive pippen). And I
� cant get mad over a guy who signs for less money
Jordan did not get less money. He renegotiated his contract to get
less per year, but he still ended up with the same amount of money if
not more.
�Lets see the average HARD working
� man makes 35K a year times 40Years of work so roughly 1.5 M, and these
� guys want twice that per year ? on average... Too much.
Maybe that 35K/year is too much. There are alot of folks who are
working harder doing less desirable jobs for minimum wage. Maybe we
should make sports stars earn minimum wage and let the people at
McDonald's make the millions.
|
9.981 | Sheesh... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 02 1993 13:08 | 22 |
| Your right maybe 1.5M per year is way too high. And maybe I dont know
my math but you say the following
Jordan did not get less money. He renegotiated his contract to get
less per year, but he still ended up with the same amount of money
if not more.
Im confused here if he was going to get 4 or 5M for 3 years and then
got 3 mil during that same time frame how did he make more ????? Are
you saying like your boss comes up to you and gives you a 25% cut in
pay but will let you work 30% longer you made out on the deal ???????
Boy That makes sense... And dont get stupid on me, many people slack
there way thru school and never make anything of themselves and if they
can only warrent minimum wage that's there choice. But to demand more
money in a year then most people make in a lifetime is greedy. I
really thought barry sandars would end up being the RB with the most
class but looks like the ol might $$$ has crept into his bed as well.
You know the market has a demand for more Drug Dealers, the money's
pretty good as weel (I was trying to top your mcdonalds statement
did I do good).
MairB
|
9.982 | Good stuff | CSC32::GAULKE | | Thu Dec 02 1993 13:26 | 12 |
|
re .980
>> .....Maybe we
>> should make sports stars earn minimum wage and let the people at
>> McDonald's make the millions.
Kinda like Letterman last Friday? (day after Thanksgiving)
That was the one with Ewing as one of the guests.
|
9.983 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 02 1993 13:51 | 17 |
| � Im confused here if he was going to get 4 or 5M for 3 years and then
� got 3 mil during that same time frame how did he make more ?????
It's called "defferred payments". That means that you get the money
that you were supposed to get over the next couple of years of your
contract paid to you at some point in the future. I hope this doesn't
confuse you more.
�And dont get stupid on me, many people slack
� there way thru school and never make anything of themselves and if they
� can only warrent minimum wage that's there choice.
Oh, I see. So if a guy works his whole life going to school and
playing a sport and working out at that sport to be the one of the best
in the country and then people plunk down $25-50+ each night to see him
perform that's their choice and they shouldn't expect to get paid for
it.
|
9.984 | Is this JD :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 02 1993 14:47 | 24 |
| Yes but He could have went else were and got the money up front and
defered payments later. If he was about money he could have demanded
almost anything he wanted, especialy after Championship #1. Chicago
(the team, the city) made Alot more money off jordan then they could
ever pay him so he would have been worth more then any current contract
in the nba today. He could have easily had 3-5 more years at this
level (of course all players are 1 injury away from retiring). He gave
back money becasue the money wasnt important. He invested and marketed
himself to the best of his ability and many judged him becuase of it.
He didnt take money out of his teamates pockets to put in his own, he
did the opposite. Emmitt, Barry Foster and soon Barry Sandars, Michael
Irvin, Troy Aikman etc, etc, etc will demand huge contracts and with
the cap where does the money come from there teamates pockets. There
all very marketable and if they played there cards right could easily
make 5+M a year without taking from there teamates. Does Emmitt,
Aikman or Irvin work any harder in the Gym and on there game then some
Special Teams Player, I doubt it. Yet when they demand the big money
the player's playing a less glorious position will lose money. Very
opposite to what Jordan did. I bet there's not 1 bull player that
would prefer a primadona (like shaq) over jordan.
And if you look back not once was I confused.... :-)
mairb
|
9.985 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 02 1993 15:16 | 21 |
| � Yes but He could have went else were and got the money up front and
� defered payments later.
There was no way he could have gone elsewhere to get more money due to
the salary cap. The salary cap rules allow you to give raises to your
own players without impacting the cap, but don't allow you to sign
players from outside of your system unless you can stay within the cap.
�He gave
� back money becasue the money wasnt important.
When did he give back money? Money from the Bulls may not have been
important but that was because Nike was paying him more than the Bulls
could.
�I bet there's not 1 bull player that
� would prefer a primadona (like shaq) over jordan.
I recall alot of disgruntled Bulls over the past few years complaining
(most anonymously) about Jordan the primadonna -- or have you forgotten
"Jordan Rules"
|
9.986 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Thu Dec 02 1993 15:20 | 20 |
| > opposite to what Jordan did. I bet there's not 1 bull player that
> would prefer a primadona (like shaq) over jordan.
You ought to hear what the Chicago beat reporters had to say about Jordan
and his relationship with some of the other players, and the folks in the
front office, and their opinions of him.
About a year ago there was a lot of controversy surrounding Jordan and
his relationships with other guys on the team and folks in the organization.
It got pretty decent airplay on WFAN, although you probably can't pull that
station in up there in Mass, as I have a hard time getting it sometimes
down here.
Your argument is down by the bow, listing heavily to starboard. If I
were the Captain, I'd be seriously thinking about ordering "Abandon Ship"
at this point......
'Saw
|
9.987 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Dec 02 1993 15:29 | 3 |
| Mike, if you really don't like sports that pay people to play them you
really should start following other sports. You can't possibly derive
any pleasure from watching the NBA or the NFL.
|
9.988 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | This space being disinfected!!! | Thu Dec 02 1993 15:48 | 5 |
| Anobody know if ANthony Carter will play this weekend fer the Vikings
er not??????????
JaKe
|
9.989 | For how long | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Thu Dec 02 1993 20:10 | 6 |
| Well me oh my Mac, yeh they sell now, but when they start off
losing games, will the interest keep up?
So I was wrong about the initial market, my only mistake (-)..
Tim
|
9.990 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Dec 02 1993 22:09 | 9 |
| What was SF payroll when they one their first SB? Probably in
the middle of the league. But once they gpot rewarded for
winning they are no longer a championship team? I guess if
the Cowboys win after the pay hikles they also won'tbe a championship
team anymore??
what a crock of ....
The Crazy Met
|
9.991 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 03 1993 09:34 | 22 |
|
Can we get the official Chris igKnorr spin to SI's "spouting at the
mouth" with their latest cover story, "Can the NFL Be Saved?". Seems
that every time Chris opens his mouth to slam someone, his very next
step lands him in a huge pile of it. Maybe we could harness this
incredible talent Chris has to make a short-term killing in the stock
market or something...
FWIW, of the steps that were outlined in the article, the one to do
away with completely free substitution is absolutely the most critical,
in my opinion. All of the benefits to doing this were dead on, without
the cost of distasteful special rules to baby the QB or other gimmicks
to explicitly favor the offense over the defense: less specialization
requiring more endurance which would result in more "natural"
breakdowns and hence more big plays and more offense, smaller but
better-conditioned all-around athletes, less injury, better recognition
of individual players. Even strictly in principle, there's something
gone wrong in a sport where many of the key athletes are only
participating in a very small percentage of the game...
glenn
|
9.992 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Dec 03 1993 09:57 | 1 |
| How will less substitution lead to less injury?
|
9.993 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 03 1993 10:13 | 11 |
|
> How will less substitution lead to less injury?
By placing the emphasis on better conditioned players, more well-rounded
players that are generally smaller in the trenches and maybe slightly
larger but slower outside of the trenches. This argument is unproven
and I'd expect that it'd be the smallest benefit to disallowing free
substitution, and the other reasons are better ones...
glenn
|
9.994 | As usual, I'm right on the money. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Dec 03 1993 10:34 | 16 |
| re: glenn
Obviously your reading comprehension skills need improving, cause my
note(s) regarding the NFL were supposed to drip with sarcasm. The fact
that a SPORT as dull and predictable as NFL football maintains the #1
spot in the "polls" of popularity (while college hoops languishes at
#16) amazes me, but then again, I remember being amazed that 'Three's
Company' was the most popular TV show in America.
For the record, I'll watch Get Smart re-runs before I'll watch Monday
Night Football, and I'd much prefer a rouzing game of 'Break The Ice'
with my daughter before even thinking about turning on a Sunday NFL
game. Saturday afternoons can be a different story though ....
- ACC Chris
|
9.995 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Dec 03 1993 10:37 | 11 |
| � -< As usual, I'm right on the money. >-
Isn't it amazing that ACChris is always right after he's been proven
wrong.
� Obviously your reading comprehension skills need improving, cause my
� note(s) regarding the NFL were supposed to drip with sarcasm.
If you note(s) were "supposed" to drip with sarcasm, then the blame
lies with the writer, not the reader, for not getting the point across.
I certainly didn't catch the sarcasm, and I'll bet noone else did.
|
9.996 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 03 1993 10:39 | 6 |
|
Now, now, Mac, in fairness I did ask for the "official spin", and Chris
did not disappoint. I'm happy...
glenn
|
9.997 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sun Dec 05 1993 21:36 | 6 |
| ouch 9-6 loss to the Colts. Jets seem to have real problems with the
Colts. Steelers win when Parcells goes for a TD with 17 seconds left in
the 4th instead of kicking a FG and going to OT.
The Crazy Met
|
9.998 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Mon Dec 06 1993 15:29 | 13 |
|
The god *()&^ &*( tv stations in this (*&^ state all do the same @!@#
stupid thing. Three minutes left in the Raiders-Bills game, a game
that is obviously going down to the wire in a close hard fought battle
and they preempt it to show the ^&%$# Broncos game in its entirety.
"We will keep you posted on the score" 10 minutes later I found out
the final score was 25-24 while NOTHING happened in the Broncos game
except a nearly meaningless first few plays of the opening drive.
At least my VAX books aren't orange.
Marc
|
9.999 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 06 1993 15:36 | 17 |
| >
> The god *()&^ &*( tv stations in this (*&^ state all do the same @!@#
> stupid thing. Three minutes left in the Raiders-Bills game, a game
> that is obviously going down to the wire in a close hard fought battle
> and they preempt it to show the ^&%$# Broncos game in its entirety.
> "We will keep you posted on the score" 10 minutes later I found out
> the final score was 25-24 while NOTHING happened in the Broncos game
> except a nearly meaningless first few plays of the opening drive.
Wow, that's really strange.
Out here, they won't cut to the Giants at 4pm no matter WHO or what is
going on in the early game. The never do that, and they could, easily
enough......
'Saw
|
9.1000 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Mon Dec 06 1993 15:39 | 5 |
| I think it is part of the contract. The primary market must see
the entire game. Hartford is a secondary market for the Giants.
The New York stations would cut in as the Denver station did.
Mike
|
9.1001 | Home Team gets TV coverage no matter what | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 06 1993 16:12 | 6 |
| �Out here, they won't cut to the Giants at 4pm no matter WHO or what is
�going on in the early game. The never do that, and they could, easily
�enough......
That's because you are in New England, not in New York, no matter how
much you wanna be.
|
9.1002 | | CAM3::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 07 1993 09:29 | 21 |
| >
> That's because you are in New England, not in New York, no matter how
> much you wanna be.
>
Do me, Mac.
The only New York team I root for is the Giants.
Actually, I like it just fine where I am. I get to see the Giants when
I want. Our TV stations don't jerk us around like the ones up there
do when it comes to the Giants.
I can see the Celtics or the Knicks, and the Rangers, or the Whalers or
the Bruins on any given night (although my cable company tends to black out
MSG quite a bit).
All in all, I'm quite satisfied....
'Saw
|
9.1003 | {Still the team to beat} | COMET::DUNCANS | | Fri Dec 10 1993 18:36 | 10 |
|
To all those Cowboy fans out there, what happened in the second half
Monday night?
All so how about Emmit Smiths 172 yards rushing?
Duncan
|
9.1004 | I wish the pats were on at 4 instead of 1... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 15 1993 15:25 | 11 |
| Last week 12 of the 14 games in the NFL were decided by a TD or less.
This week there are 8 games that involve teams with playoff
implications, going down the Home Stretch :-)
BIG GAMES:
Buffalo AT Miami
Houston AT Pittsburg
And the pats will be on TV at 1pm which is when both of
these games will be played. So Pats on NBC and CBS Cant
broadcast a game at 1pm....
Mab
|
9.1005 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 20 1993 10:03 | 11 |
| Big news for the NFL this weekend. FOX outbid CBS for the rights to
broadcast the NFC on TV. CBS is now scrambling to compete with NBC for
the rights to the AFC. Maybe SI's prediction of the demise of the NFL
were premature. CBS certainly has had a poor track record dealing with
major sports over the years. They passed on the NBA just before the
league took off. They overpaid and undercovered MLB. Now they lost
the NFL after 30 years.
I hope NBC keeps the AFC. My cable company only carries 1 CBS
affiliate and they are subject to the blackout rules. I get 3 NBC
affiliates, one of which is outside of the blackout range.
|
9.1006 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | All products 100% buzzword compliant | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:22 | 6 |
|
I'm really surprised the league went with Fox. I don't think they
cover near as much of the US as CBS. What will happen in the areas
with no Fox networks?
brews
|
9.1007 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:33 | 7 |
| � I'm really surprised the league went with Fox. I don't think they
� cover near as much of the US as CBS. What will happen in the areas
� with no Fox networks?
According to a guy with USA Today, local affiliates will probably go
running to FOX to sign up to at least carry the football games. You
might even see a few CBS affiliates switch to FOX.
|
9.1008 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:45 | 12 |
| FOX will no doubt suck.
For my money, the CBS pairings, for the top games, were damned good.
Now Fox will have a bunch of unknown wannabes, and we'll end up with stuff like
that team that was doing the TNT Sunday night broadcasts (pardon me
whilst I hurl).
Also, talk of CBS going after Monday night football. Now THAT'd be
interesting....
Saw
|
9.1009 | They paid big for the privilege... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:49 | 12 |
|
> I'm really surprised the league went with Fox.
A 50% increase over the current rights fees and $100M/year more than
the CBS bid ($395M to $295M) carries a lot of clout. Since CBS and
NBC were saying all along that they were not going to significantly
increase their bids over the existing fees and were not bluffing, I
think it's obvious that Fox paid a bonus premium to pry the NFC away.
No one miscalculates that bad...
glenn
|
9.1010 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Number 3 Looms over Fenway | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:49 | 8 |
|
ABC just signed a 4 year deal so I guess MNF stays on ABC.
I'll bet that some of the CBS announcers go over to Fox.
Chappy
|
9.1011 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Dec 20 1993 11:55 | 17 |
| �FOX will no doubt suck.
�
�For my money, the CBS pairings, for the top games, were damned good.
�Now Fox will have a bunch of unknown wannabes, and we'll end up with stuff like
�that team that was doing the TNT Sunday night broadcasts (pardon me
�whilst I hurl).
Don't be surprised to see FOX luring away some of those CBS folks.
Somehow I can't picture Madden doing figure skating commentary.
�Also, talk of CBS going after Monday night football. Now THAT'd be
�interesting....
Well, USA Today guy seemed to think CBS' efforts to compensate for
losing the NFC are lame. Rumor has it, CBS could have had the NFC for
less money than FOX ended up paying if they had handled the
negotiations better.
|
9.1012 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:13 | 6 |
| The only question left is who gets the AFC - CBS or NBC. I think
the decision will be announced today.
The season also goes back to 17 weeks - only one bye week per team.
Mike
|
9.1013 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:15 | 5 |
| >
> The season also goes back to 17 weeks - only one bye week per team.
>
Great. Now if we can only get it back to 16 weeks......8^)
|
9.1014 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Drew > Vinny > Bernie | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:21 | 6 |
| Denny said that this FOX deal will mean that the channel will have
a monopoly on all the Simpsons. Bart, Homer, Lisa, Maggie, Marge and
O.J. Does this mean that "In Living Color" will now be the official NFL
Super Bowl halftime show?
/Don
|
9.1015 | | GWEN::ASHE | I've got the kevorka | Mon Dec 20 1993 12:37 | 2 |
| OJ's on NBC though...
|
9.1016 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Mon Dec 20 1993 14:46 | 8 |
|
FOX won't have any problems with announcers/analysts. Either NBC or
CBS will be without football. Thus, won't need the announcers. Big problem
for FOX could be no Pat Summerall. Summerall, does tennis, golf, and other
things for CBS. While Madden does just football, will Madden go without
Summerall? Who knows maybe CBS will outbid NBC and it will be a mute point.
Ron
|
9.1017 | I know Murdoch's got $$$ to burn, but this is ridiculous | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Mon Dec 20 1993 14:58 | 5 |
| Somebody's got to explain to me how a product that lost a company
over $80 million this year is worth $100 million MORE to a competitor
the following year!?!?!
NAZZ
|
9.1018 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Dec 20 1993 14:59 | 7 |
| No Summerall will be fine. Madden is ok, but Summerall is suffering
from age. He forgets what he's talking about, and makes "bad calls".
Did anyone catch the announcer for the Bear/Bronco game get on Ditkas
case? I was laughing.
Tim
|
9.1019 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Dec 20 1993 15:42 | 11 |
| re: .1017
Fairly easy to explain. FOX is thought of as a weak-sister network; in addition
2 other companies (Paramount and Warner Brothers) have announced that they
want to start a network. By getting the NFC FOX has pulled themselves into
the big leagues and possibly pre-empted a 5th network. CBS wanted the NFL to
make money, FOX wants the exposure and is willing to pay a premium for it.
Think of it as going after market share first and profits later.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1020 | No more CBS? | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Mon Dec 20 1993 19:12 | 6 |
|
NBC got the AFC contract. I guess that this means that CBS is
outta the NFL?
Kevin
|
9.1021 | NBC ... what a bummer | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Drew > Vinny > Bernie | Tue Dec 21 1993 07:53 | 8 |
|
Not good. I would have been happier if NBC didn't get the
contract. Only being able to pick up the C band with my dish means
I will have to watch most games over the next 4 years in inverted
video. What a bummer. Looks like I may be investing in a new horn
to pick up K band.
Hal
|
9.1022 | The more game the merrier | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 21 1993 08:25 | 7 |
| Im happy, my cable gets to NBC Stations (SpringField and Boston) and
Im not positive but I beleive I get 2 Fox Affiliates as well. I could
have big time choices on which games to watch. As it is a couple times
this years I had an NBC and CBS game on and the pats on NBC springfiled
all at the same time :-) I need to buy/setup a few more TV's :-)
mab
|
9.1023 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 21 1993 09:47 | 29 |
| This was a BIG discussion on the FAN yesterday.
CBS is out in the cold. Recently, they have lost MLB, NBA and now the
NFL. As Mike Francesa said, "it's going to be a ghost town over there".
Basically CBS will be on in March for the NCAAs, and April for the Masters.
After that there will be a big drought until the US Open Tennis, then
they'll be back on around Christmas time. Oh yeah, they'll do golf.
On the other hand, Fox is highly suspect in terms of doing a good job
covering football. They've never done it before. Chances are we'll end
up with something of the caliber of the TNT Sunday Night games.
Francesa postulated that the show the world they are serious, they have to
sign Madden.
I'm pretty confident, that with a Fox affiliate in Hartford, we should
be seeing all the Giants games. I can't believe that we wouldn't.
The ONLY good thing about CBS losing the contract is that we do NOT have
to see that big fat asshole ( and now his wife) who proclaims "I'm a BIG
fan"....
'Saw
|
9.1025 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:20 | 19 |
|
What is even more shocking is that CBS bid higher than NBC for
the AFC. There is no stipulation in the contract that the Patriots have
to stay in New England. This was a clause in the last contract. So now the
NFL won't be violating the TV contract when the Pats move. When negotiating
with NBC about this claus. Tagliabue called up Weld to talk to him about
the Megaplex. Apparently if a Megaplex was going to be built. The claus
stating that the Pats have to stay in the New England TV market would have
been in the new contract. Weld couldn't guarantee the Megaplex so the
claus was taken out of the TV contract.
Back to the CBS out bidding NBC. CBS did not make there bid until
Friday. NBC's deal was finalized on Thursday. I guess all bids had to be
in by Thursday. So even though CBS bid higher, they were pass the deadline.
FOX tv got caught on this dealine issue when bidding for MNF a few years
back. They missed the deadline, so they didn't get MNF. This year FOX
made bids for the NFC and the AFC. So they wouldn't miss the deadline. They
were granted the NFC, so they were ineligible for the AFC.
Ron
|
9.1026 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:26 | 18 |
|
> CBS is out in the cold. Recently, they have lost MLB, NBA and now the
> NFL. As Mike Francesa said, "it's going to be a ghost town over there".
And maybe if they instead devote their energies to developing some
decent programming as opposed to the other networks they might even
make some real money for a change. The only thing better than winning
these contracts might be losing them...
I'm skeptical of Fox, too. We'll see, but I can foresee all sorts of
possibilities around tacky promotional ideas (even by network sports
standards) with the NFL. At the risk of being called an old fuddydud, I
still think most of Fox' programming is low-grade crap (revolutionary or
not) and the NFL will just be used as a major vehicle to peddle it...
glenn
|
9.1027 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:40 | 17 |
| >
> I'm skeptical of Fox, too. We'll see, but I can foresee all sorts of
> possibilities around tacky promotional ideas (even by network sports
> standards) with the NFL. At the risk of being called an old fuddydud, I
> still think most of Fox' programming is low-grade crap (revolutionary or
> not) and the NFL will just be used as a major vehicle to peddle it...
I agree.
On WFAN yesterday, Francesa was laughing, saying that Fox's halftime
and pregame shows would probably give "A Current Affair" a run for its
money....
'Saw
|
9.1028 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:41 | 8 |
| Bart Simpson promoting the NFL games would be a much better idea than
the "I'm a big fan" dud.
FOX could hire lots of the CBS people. Many of the football-only types have
a clause in their CBS contracts that allows them to go elsewhere if
CBS is not broadcasting the NFL.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1029 | They're already at it.... | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:51 | 7 |
| I've already got a T-shirt with Bart in a Browns uniform,
frantically waving his arms saying, "I'm open, Man!"
The legend beneath says "One Offensive Dude."
Preferable to the "Big Fan" IMO.
dr.a
|
9.1030 | | GWEN::ASHE | I've got the kevorka | Tue Dec 21 1993 10:56 | 3 |
| USA Today article titled "CBS to 'downsize' after losing NFL.
THey're left with golf, tennis, college hoop and the 94 Olympics.
|
9.1031 | Another Friday night flashback; Saw did a good impersonation | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 21 1993 11:01 | 6 |
|
The Simpsons are okay; I'm more worried about the Sawmain's favorite
nose-picking guy though... ;-)
glenn
|
9.1032 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Tue Dec 21 1993 11:08 | 11 |
| >
> The Simpsons are okay; I'm more worried about the Sawmain's favorite
> nose-picking guy though... ;-)
>
Huh-huh, huh-huh-huh.....
Butt-munch....
Huh-huh, huh-huh-huh.....
|
9.1033 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 21 1993 11:54 | 3 |
| wrong network, Glenn.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1034 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 21 1993 12:06 | 10 |
|
> wrong network, Glenn.
That wasn't the guy(s) I was referring to. If 'Sawmain could
ever get that hangover haze burned off it might yet come to him...
;-)
glenn
|
9.1035 | 'Sawmain here's a hint-well least I think so | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 21 1993 12:08 | 3 |
| Love and marriage, love and marriage, etc. ??
The Crazy Met
|
9.1036 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 21 1993 13:19 | 6 |
| Tagliabue was interviewed on Good Morning America this morning. He
said that the league went for FOX, not only for the money but because
they feel that Fox can expand the league's fan base among women and
young people. They've allegedly done some football broadcasts for the
WFL in Europe and the NFL liked their style. They think Fox can do for
the NFL what ABC did when they first started MNF.
|
9.1037 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 21 1993 13:59 | 6 |
| The owner of the Eagles has announced he is going to build a new
stadium for his football franchise. What makes this announcement so
different from all those other owners announcing new stadia you ask?
The Iggles owner is not asking the politicians and citizens of
Philadelphia to foot the bill. The new stadium is going to be
privately financed. Orthwein and Tagliabue, please take note.
|
9.1038 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 21 1993 14:12 | 3 |
| Wasn't Joe Robbie Stadium privately financed??
The Crazy Met
|
9.1039 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Tue Dec 21 1993 15:34 | 17 |
| If you think Braman is doing this for altruistic reasons, I have some
swampland to sell you!
The Eagles lease with the city (negotiated by Tose when he threatened
to move the Eagles to Phoenix) gives the team the revenue from the
luxury boxes until the year 2001. Bottom Line Braman sees that cash cow
going away and wants to get major concessions from the city of
Philadelphia, in the way of tax releif and free land, and he will build
a stadium near the sports complex in south Philadelphia. This would
give Norman more parjing $$, more concession stand $$, no rent and all
of the luxury box $$. If norman didn't have the lease deal with
Philadelphia, he's have already moved the team to Baltimore for the
nicer stadium and sweetheart deal they would give him there. Make no
mistake, Braman is not a saint by and stretch.
Dennis Faust
|
9.1040 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Tue Dec 21 1993 15:35 | 7 |
| Also.....
Don't believe it until it happens!!!!
Dennis Faust
|
9.1041 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 21 1993 15:41 | 5 |
| re: Eagles and stadium
didn't another Philly team, the 76ers, announce a plan to play in New Jersey?
The Crazy Met
|
9.1042 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Tue Dec 21 1993 15:48 | 23 |
| re: the Sixers
They announced that they plan to try to negotiate a deal for a new
arena in Camden. NJ Gov. Jim Florio, with about 2 weeks left in his
term, is doing the deal for NJ, but Gov-elect Christine Whitman will
also need to approve any deal. Whitman doesn't seem to be leaning
toward approving the deal.
Sixer owner Harold Katz had been working with Flyers owner Ed Snyder
(owner of Spectacor, the largest arena management firm in the US) to
build Spectrum II, a 20,000+ seat arena in S. Philadelphia, with a
mall, hotel and connecting ramps into the existing Spectrum. That kind
of facility would give Pgiladelphia a real shot at hosting some very
large conventions and would be a big boost to the city. fFrom what I've
read, Snyder's deal to Katz wasn't good enough for Harold, so he
started looking elsewhere.
I'm not convinced any of the local teams will have a new facility until
they start digging a hole in the ground. The deal for Spectrum II was
announced about 1 1/2 years ago.
Dennis Faust
|
9.1043 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 21 1993 15:50 | 3 |
| Does Philly have enough hotel rooms to host a really large convention??
The Crazy Met
|
9.1044 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Tue Dec 21 1993 15:59 | 11 |
| re: 1042
So it sounds like Braman is using the NJ scheme as a bargaining chip with
Snyder. He's hoping the threat of lost rent by the Sixers will prompt his
sweeten the deal, and the Sixers can stay in Philly.
Philly is a decent city, with historical aspects similar to Boston, but I still
don't see that there are enough conventions/trade shows/etc. to support what
all these major cities are doing in an attempt to bring them in.
=Bob=
|
9.1045 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Dec 21 1993 17:10 | 4 |
| But Dennis, at least the Eagles' owner isn't trying to get the money to
build his new stadium from the taxpayers like the Patriots and the NFL
are trying to do with this Megaplex thing. And, he's not threatening
to move the Eagles out of Philly.
|
9.1046 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Tue Dec 21 1993 18:52 | 18 |
| re: -1
Just wait.... Norman is the lowest of the low.
re: Hotel Rooms
The Spectrum II project had a hotel as part of it, and the complex is
only about 10 minutes from the airport, with tons of rooms down there.
When the Spectrum II was originally anounced, there was some talk of
Philadelphia trying to host an Olympics and trying to get the political
conventions.
BTW - Spectrum II would be built without public monies (except for the
free land and tax concessions from the city, plus the loss of revenue
from the exiting facility).
Dennis Faust
|
9.1047 | | USCTR1::KING | | Wed Dec 22 1993 08:27 | 5 |
| J. Jacobs, owner of the Boston Bruins and Boston Garden, has ordered
his people to get Patriots facts and figures from Goldman-Sachs to
make a bid for the Football team...
REK
|
9.1048 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Dec 22 1993 11:08 | 3 |
| and if youze thought the Sullivan's were cheapos ....
The Crazy Met
|
9.1049 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Wed Dec 22 1993 12:42 | 8 |
| For once I have to agree with Craze. If Jacobs owns the team we
can look forward to yearly ticket price increases, yearly salary
battles with the players, and you'll never get your seat fixed if it's
broken. I assume Jeremy wants to buy the team with the understanding
that the state of Massachusetts will give him the 700 million handout
in the form of a SissyPlex.
/Don
|
9.1050 | guide to playoffs | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Tue Dec 28 1993 15:08 | 57 |
| NFL Playoff possibilities (from USA Today):
AFC EAST
Buffalo at Indianapolis:
clinched division; tied with Houston for homefield
advantage throughout AFC playoffs; has edge based on
win over Oilers.
Miami at New England:
can clinch playoff berth with a victory.
NY Jets at Houston:
can clinch playoff berth with a victory plus a Raiders
loss and a Pittsburgh victory OR loss by Miami.
AFC CENTRAL
Houston vs NY Jets:
clinched division; tied with Buffalo for homefield
advantage throughout AFC playoffs.
Pittsburgh vs Cleveland:
can clinch playoff berth with a victory plus a Raider
loss and Jets loss OR if Miami and Jets lose.
AFC WEST
Kansas City vs Seatlle:
clinced division.
Denver at Raiders:
clinched playoff berth.
LA Raiders vs Denver:
can clinch playoff berth with victory OR a loss plus
a loss by Pittsburgh.
NFC EAST
NY Giants vs Dallas:
clinched playoff berth; can clinch division and home
field advantage throughout NFC playoff with a victory.
Dallas at Giants:
clinched playoff berth; can clinch division and home
field advantage throughout NFC playoff with a victory.
Philadelphia at San Francisco:
can clinch playoff berth with victory plus losses by
Minnesota and New Orleans.
NFC CENTRAL
Detroit vs Green Bay:
clinched playoff berth; can clinch division with a
victory; division winner will host wild card playoff game.
Green Bay at Detroit:
clinched playoff berth; can clinch division with a
victory; division winner will host wild card playoff game.
Minnesota at Washington:
can clinch playoff berth with victory.
NFC WEST
San Francisco vs Philadelphia:
clinched division; will host divisional playoff game.
New Orleans vs Cincinnati:
can clinch playoff berth with a victory plus losses by
Minnesota and Philadelphia.
|
9.1051 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 28 1993 15:12 | 11 |
| > Philadelphia at San Francisco:
> can clinch playoff berth with victory plus losses by
> Minnesota and New Orleans.
> New Orleans vs Cincinnati:
> can clinch playoff berth with a victory plus losses by
> Minnesota and Philadelphia.
What happens if Minnesota loses, and both New Orleans and Philadelphia
win (highly unlikely scenario, I admit) ?
|
9.1052 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Dec 28 1993 15:20 | 4 |
| Also, Miami can also get into the playoffs if they lose. What
scenario would that be?
The Crazy Met
|
9.1053 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dan Reeves mental midget | Tue Dec 28 1993 15:20 | 6 |
|
given they just played one another wouldn't thay use head to head as the
tiebreaker giving the nod to Philly......
mike
|
9.1054 | I think | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Tue Dec 28 1993 16:44 | 14 |
| Re: New Orleans, Philadelphia, Minnesota
The wording of the description for the Saints implies that the only way
in for them is with losses by both the Vikings and the Eagles. Same goes
for the Eagles needing losses by both the Vikings and the Saints.
Minnesota could lose and still get in if'n Philadelphia and New Orleans
both also lose.
Re: Miami
They're in if'n the lose if the Jets and the Steelers also lose.
TTom
|
9.1055 | They wearin' bags in N'Awlins yet? | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Dec 28 1993 21:00 | 6 |
| Be a damned crime if the 'Aints get in... What a choke job.
Mora oughta be jettisoned.
MikeL
|
9.1056 | Go Pack... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | I still hate Barbie dolls!!!! | Wed Dec 29 1993 10:31 | 0 |
9.1057 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Wed Dec 29 1993 11:04 | 9 |
| re: Minn., NO and Phila. tie
It then goes to total point differential in conference games. The long
and short is that the Eagles would need to beat the 49ers by alot of
points to come up the wildcard. That would be only the 2nd time point
differential will have been used to determine who goes to the playoffs.
Dennis Faust
|
9.1058 | Pro Bowlers - No Jets,Pats,Colts,Bengals | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Dec 29 1993 11:06 | 51 |
| NFC AFC
--- ---
QB Troy Aikman, Dallas QB John Elway, Denver
Steve Young, San Fransisco Joe Montana, Kansas City
Phil Simms, N.Y.Giants Warren Moon, Houston
RB Emmitt Smith, Dallas RB Marcus Allen, Kansas City
Barry Sanders, Detroit Thurman Thomas, Buffalo
Jerome Bettis, L.A.Rams Keith Byars, Miami
Daryl Johnston, Dallas
WR Jerry Rice, San Fransisco WR Tim Brown, L.A.Raiders
Michael Irvin, Dallas Anthony Miller, San Diego
Sterling Sharpe, Green Bay Irving Fryar, Miami
Andre Rison, Atlanta Andre Reed, Buffalo
TE Jay Novacek, Dallas TE Shannon Sharpe, Denver
Brent Jones, San Fransisco Keith Jackson, Miami
T Harris Barton, San Fransisco T Richmond Webb, Miami
Erik Williams, Dallas Howard Ballard, Buffalo
Jumbo Elliott, N.Y.Giants John Alt, Kansas City
G Nate Newton, Dallas G Mike Munchak, Houston
Randall McDaniel, Minnesota Steve Wisniewski, L.A.Raiders
Guy McIntyre, San Fransisco Keith Sims, Miami
C Jesse Sapolu, San Fransisco C Bruce Matthews, Houston
Bart Oates, N.Y.Giants Dermontti Dawson, Pittsburgh
DE Richard Dent, Chicago DE Bruce Smith, Buffalo
Reggie White, Green Bay Neil Smith, Kansas City
Chris Doleman, Minnesota Leslie O'Neal, San Diego
DT Sean Gilbert, L.A.Rams DT Cortez Kennedy, Seattle
John Randle, Minnesota Ray Childress, Houston
Russell Maryland, Dallas Michael Dean Perry, Cleveland
OLB Rickey Jackson, New Orleans OLB Derrick Thomas, Kansas City
Renaldo Turnbull, New Orleans Greg Lloyd, Pittsburgh
Pat Swilling, Detroit Cornelius Bennett, Buffalo
ILB Hardy Nickerson, Tampa Bay ILB Junior Seau, San Diego
Ken Norton, Dallas Karl Mecklenberg, Denver
CB Deion Sanders, Atlanta CB Ron Woodson, Pittsburgh
Eric Allen, Philadelphia Nate Odomes, Buffalo
Donnell Woolford, Chicago Terry McDaniel, L.A.Raiders
S Mark Carrier, Chicago S Steve Atwater, Denver
Tim McDonald, San Fransisco Dennis Smith, Denver
Thomas Everett, Dallas Eugene Robinson, Seattle
K Norm Johnson, Atlanta K Gary Anderson, Pittsburgh
Pt Rich Camarillo, Phoenix Pt Greg Montgomery, Houston
Ret Tyrone Hughes, New Orleans Ret Eric Metcalf, Cleveland
ST Elbert Shelley, Atlanta ST John Tasker, Buffalo
INJURED
-------
C Mark Stepnoski, Dallas RB Barry Foster, Pittsburgh
WR Webster Slaughter, Houston
|
9.1059 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dan Reeves mental midget | Wed Dec 29 1993 11:21 | 7 |
|
Fryar has about as much business being in the probowl as I do....Byars before
Russell or Warren or Johnny Johnson is pretty lame too.
I see Mark Collins got screwed again........
mike
|
9.1060 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Dec 29 1993 11:25 | 8 |
| > Fryar has about as much business being in the probowl as I do....Byars before
> Russell or Warren or Johnny Johnson is pretty lame too.
>
> I see Mark Collins got screwed again........
Don't forget that for the first time, the fans had a voice in the selections,
so you might see a few more less-achievers on the squad in the future than we
have seen in the past.
|
9.1061 | Fryar deserves it based on performance alone... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 29 1993 11:33 | 17 |
| Ok all knowing one, who in the AFC deserve's to be in the pro bowl
more then Fryar ? A few notables would be Brian Blades SEA, then
either Jeffries of Givins but neither had better season's then Fryar
and they had moon healthy all year. Jeffries and Givins combined for
7TD's and 2 100yrd games (I dont have MNF box scores so they may have
scored on a MNF game somewhere in there, same with Fryar and Miami).
But Fryar had 6TD's and 2 100yrd games... So id say he had a better
year then either of them (maybe both). Blades had 3TD's and 2100yrd
games....
I know Pickens had a good year, but face it he plays for Cinncy...
I just dont see any other WR's getting the nod hands down or any nod
from anyone over Fryar.. (Unless your a fryar basher/hater then I guess
crittendon should go over fryar)
mab
|
9.1062 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Wed Dec 29 1993 11:42 | 6 |
|
The fan ballots only counted as 1/3 of the total vote. Coaches were
1/3 and the players were the other 1/3. So Fryar didn't get in just
because of the fans.
Ron
|
9.1063 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Dec 29 1993 12:22 | 4 |
| a tie which included the Raiders and Miami could also be decided by
point differential.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1064 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Wed Dec 29 1993 12:31 | 6 |
| The Pro Bowl vote goes to the players who get the most commercial
endorsements (hence the plethora of Cowboys). IRVING FRYAR is one of
the very few deserving players and he's only going because Webster
Slaughter got hurt.
/Don
|
9.1065 | | MKFSA::LONG | I know a survivor! | Wed Dec 29 1993 14:15 | 5 |
| I'm more suprised at Marcus Allen's selection than Fryar's.
billl
|
9.1066 | | DECWET::METZGER | America's most beloved game show host | Wed Dec 29 1993 14:47 | 21 |
|
Why? He leads the AFC in touchdowns and is a fan and media favorite (Thanks to
every announcer mentioning what a year he is having after sitting on his butt
for the last 2 waiting for Uncle Al to stop burying the hatchet in his back).
The reason Byars is in thier is that they instituted a new position called
fullback so that their weren't 4 tailbacks selected and nobody to block for
them during the game (that nobody wants to play anyway)
Speaking of which...are they every going to do away with the game and just have
the teams selected and send them all to Hawaii to frolic on the beach and play
that most demanding sport of volleyball? It seems like less and less of the
players show up every year and opt instead for their annual post season surgery
appointments....
Mebbe they should just go straight into the superstars, battle of the network
stars or circus of the stars competition...
Metz
Michael Bates over Steve Tasker for special teams player any day....
|
9.1067 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Dec 29 1993 14:51 | 5 |
| > I'm more suprised at Marcus Allen's selection than Fryar's.
Allen's still playing?? :-)
The Crazy Met
|
9.1068 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | WorldCup-BetterThanNytol | Wed Dec 29 1993 15:32 | 10 |
| Marcus Allen also appeared on HBO's First & Ten. Serious
qualifications. Now with FOX in the picture you can expect the Pro
Bowl selection to be more surreal with the football players who appear
on Beverly Hills/Melrose Place/90210 to get serious consideration
regardless of football abilities. Looks like "The Boz" started in the
league too early. Gee, all we need to do now is get rid of those nasty
outdoor stadiums and the soccerization of the sport will be complete.
8^(
/Don
|
9.1069 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Wed Dec 29 1993 19:22 | 15 |
| Here are the AFC wild card possibilities if the Jets win on Sunday.
Jets Dolphins Steelers Raiders Who gets in
W L W W J,R
W L L W J,R
W L W L J,R
W L L L J,S
W W L L D,R
W W W L J,D
W W W W D,R
W W L W D,R
The Crazy Met
|
9.1070 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Dec 30 1993 08:38 | 19 |
| > <<< Note 9.1069 by MSE1::FRANCUS "Mets in '94" >>>
>
> Here are the AFC wild card possibilities if the Jets win on Sunday.
>
> Jets Dolphins Steelers Raiders Who gets in
>
> W L W W J,R
> W L L W J,R
> W L W L J,R
> W L L L J,S
The Steelers can't get in if they lose.
> W W L L D,R
> W W W L J,D
> W W W W D,R
> W W L W D,R
>
> The Crazy Met
|
9.1071 | HTH | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Number 3 Looms over Fenway | Thu Dec 30 1993 08:50 | 8 |
|
If the Stellers lose the Raiders are in!\
:-)
Chap
|
9.1072 | | MKFSA::LONG | I know a survivor! | Thu Dec 30 1993 08:59 | 8 |
| >> > W L L L J,S
>> The Steelers can't get in if they lose.
I think this only works out if the Steelers win.
billl
|
9.1073 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Dec 30 1993 11:21 | 4 |
| yeah thats right, my typo.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1074 | NFL ruling on union dues | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Thu Dec 30 1993 12:08 | 85 |
| Article: 7281
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.virginia+dc
Subject: Arbitrator rules for NFLPA against Redskins
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 93 17:39:36 PST
NEW YORK (UPI) -- An arbitrator ruled Wednesday in favor of the
National Football League Players Association in its dispute with 35
members of the Washington Redskins who have failed to pay their union
dues.
Labor arbitrator Herb Fishgold ruled that since the Redskins play
their games in RFK Stadium, they are subject to Washington, D.C., labor
laws.
Members of the Redskins face suspension for their final game of the
regular season for not paying their annual union dues of $5,000 to the
NFLPA. The Redskins host the Minnesota Vikings on Friday.
Players who have not paid their dues could be suspended by their
respective teams, who are not obligated to take action but face a
grievance from the NFLPA.
However, Redskins tight end Terry Orr filed a lawsuit against the
NFLPA that since the Redskins practice and have their headquarters in
Virginia they should be subject to that state's right-to-work labor
laws. The suit will be heard Thursday in a circuit county court in
Virginia.
``Labor arbitrator Herb Fishgold has issued a premature factual
finding,'' a statement released by the Redskins said. ``It is
inappropriate to do so at this time in our opinion because a hearing is
scheduled for Thursday, Dec. 30 in a circuit court in Loudoun County,
Va., before Judge Horn. The Washington Redskins are subject to the laws
of Virginia -- a right to work state.''
If a player chooses not to join a union, the collective bargaining
agreement stipulates he must still pay a $5,000 service fee, except in
states with right-to-work labor laws. The laws affect eight NFL teams --
the Dallas Cowboys, Houston Oilers, Phoenix Cardinals, Tampa Bay
Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins, Denver Broncos, Atlanta Falcons and New
Orleans Saints.
Article: 7285
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football
Subject: Arbitrator's ruling may force some Redskins to sit out
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 93 8:10:45 PST
WASHINGTON, D.C. (UPI) -- Several members of the Washington Redskins
may miss Friday's regular season finale against the Minnesota Vikings as
the result of an arbitration ruling for failing to pay union dues.
An arbitrator ruled Wednesday in favor of the National Football
League Players Association in a dispute against 35 Redskins players for
not paying their annual union dues of $5,000.
Thirty-five members of the Redskins have refused to pay the dues in
protest of the labor contract between the union and the owners. Several
of the 35 members are willing to forfeit a game's pay and not suit up
for Friday's game against the Vikings at RFK Stadium.
If a player chooses not to join a union, the collective bargaining
agreement stipulates he still must pay a $5,000 service fee, except in
states with right-to-work labor laws. The laws affect eight NFL teams --
the Dallas Cowboys, Houston Oilers, Phoenix Cardinals, Tampa Bay
Buccaneers, Miami Dolphins, Denver Broncos, Atlanta Falcons and New
Orleans Saints.
Labor arbitrator Herb Fishgold ruled that since the Redskins play
their games in RFK Stadium, they are subject to Washington, D.C., labor
laws.
However, Redskins tight end Terry Orr filed a lawsuit against the
NFLPA claiming that since the Redskins practice and are headquartered in
Ashburn, Va., they are subject to Virginia's right-to-work labor laws.
The suit was to be heard Thursday in a circuit county court in Leesburg,
Va.
Orr was joined by receiver Art Monk, defensive ends Charles Mann and
Al Noga and linebacker Carl Banks in choosing to forfeit a game's
paycheck rather than pay the union dues.
Fishgold said he would not order the Redskins to suspend the players
until after the court hearing.
If the ruling supports the arbitrator's decision and several members
of the Redskins refuse to play, it would provide a huge advantage for
Minnesota, which needs a win Friday to clinch an NFC playoff berth. If
the Vikings lose Friday, the Philadelphia Eagles and New Orleans Saints
would still be alive for a playoff berth.
The union says players on the other 27 teams have paid their annual
dues.
The Redskins issued the following statement on Wednesday's ruling:
``Labor arbitrator Herb Fishgold has issued a premature factual
finding. It is inappropriate to do so at this time in our opinion
because a hearing is scheduled for Thursday, December 30th in a circuit
court in Loudoun County, Virginia before Judge Horn. The Washington
Redskins are subject to the laws of Virginia -- a right to work state.''
|
9.1075 | Praying fer a miracle | PTOVAX::JACOB | Bearded once again | Sun Jan 02 1994 12:51 | 4 |
| The way it is in my paper, if the STEELERS win and any two of the Jets
Raiders and Fish lose, the STEELERS are in.
JaKe
|
9.1076 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sun Jan 02 1994 19:56 | 11 |
| Miami lost, Steelers won. Broncos had a 30-10 lead over the Raiders.
Raiders scored a TD with no time left to tie. Broncos missed a FG in
OT. Raiders kicked an FG to win.
Jets-Oilers in few minutes. Jets win they are in the playoffs. Oilers
win, Steelers make the playoffs. Buffalo won to clinch home field for
the playoffs; tonights game means nothing to Houston since they beat KC
in a tie-breaker to get the bye. Interesting to see if Moon will play.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1077 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Mon Jan 03 1994 10:24 | 3 |
|
The Patriots gave Jake 2 free gifts this year. They blew the
game againsts the steelers. Then beat the fish yesterday in OT.
|
9.1078 | | MKFSA::LONG | I know a survivor! | Mon Jan 03 1994 10:27 | 8 |
| Yeah where is TCM with that spiffy new p-name JaKe got him for the
New Year?
I guess that makes TC* the "Sports All Time P-name Bet Looser".
billl
|
9.1079 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 03 1994 10:48 | 3 |
| JaKe hasn't sent me the p_name yet.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1080 | :-) | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Number 3 Looms over Fenway | Mon Jan 03 1994 11:09 | 13 |
|
Likely story!!!!!!
He told me too tell you to put
" Jets, Mets, SUCK!!!"
Chappy
|
9.1081 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Mon Jan 03 1994 11:36 | 8 |
| Did anyone catch the Letterman that had the top 10 drinks of 1993?
One of them was
Seagrams 7, Mets 0
I was rolling.....
|
9.1082 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 03 1994 12:30 | 16 |
| RE Pro Bowl Picks:
�Irving Fryar, Miami
How did that bum get in there?
�TE Shannon Sharpe, Denver
� Keith Jackson, Miami
Ben Coates wuz robbed.
�ILB Junior Seau, San Diego
� Karl Mecklenberg, Denver
Mecklenberg is still voted to the Pro Bowl? Are they going to let him
use his wheelchair? Vincent Brown wuz robbed.
|
9.1083 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 03 1994 12:37 | 6 |
| � Don't forget that for the first time, the fans had a voice in the selections,
� so you might see a few more less-achievers on the squad in the future than we
� have seen in the past.
Fryar is only the 3rd Miami receiver to rack up 1000+ yards in a
season. Doesn't sound like a less-achiever to me.
|
9.1084 | Irving's return... unimpressive... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 03 1994 12:58 | 8 |
|
Yes, how can the great IRVING FRYAR not be going to the playoffs again
this year? Nice hands on that big, wide-open 25-yarder when the chips
were down in yesterday's game. At least the Patriots have their draft
picks to use in the long lonely offseason...
glenn
|
9.1085 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Jan 03 1994 12:58 | 1 |
| Who is Ben Coates and Vincent Brown?
|
9.1086 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 03 1994 13:11 | 9 |
| Yabbut, Glenn, you seem to forget the key catch Irving made (which put
him over the 1000 yard mark) in another Miami drive.
� Who is Ben Coates and Vincent Brown?
I realize that the only football players folks in Coloraddy know about
are the ones that wear orange so I'll help you out. Coates and Brown
play for the Patriots. Coates leads the NFL in TDs for a TE, and Brown
is one of the best tacklers in the game.
|
9.1087 | Okay, he's good, but let's cease with the moaning... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 03 1994 13:30 | 9 |
|
> Yabbut, Glenn, you seem to forget the key catch Irving made (which put
> him over the 1000 yard mark) in another Miami drive.
Yeah, big deal, 3 catches, 41 yards, including the wide-open
catch-and-run you mention. Quick, somebody call Canton... ;-)
glenn
|
9.1088 | Loved to see Shula sulk off | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Jan 03 1994 14:49 | 12 |
| Keith Jackson, TE. World's biggest frontrunner.
I was at yesterday's "happening" in Foxboro and he did his obnoxious
celebrating after catching a 5 yd pass in the third quarter which
got the 'Phins a first down near midfield (way to go Keith).
A_course, he got injured later on and lied there on the field while
some neighbors of mine in the stands urged Keith to get up and start
celebratin'. Not too classy but considering it was Jackson... 8^)
MikeL
|
9.1089 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Jan 03 1994 17:08 | 11 |
| Wrongo Mac, I know plenty about many players on other rosters. I
haven't seen 1 Patsies game this year, so didn't get to see any of that
pro-bowl shoulda been talent.
Look at Simon Fletcher. He was snubbed again. The only AFC player
with more sacks than him over the past 3-4 years is Neil Smith, or so I
saw in local rag (which isn't much to talk about)..
Maybe next year....
Tim
|
9.1090 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly CSG/AVS DTN:293-5983 | Mon Jan 03 1994 18:32 | 3 |
|
AFC beats NFC in interconference play this year!
|
9.1091 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NoTeam-NoBud | Tue Jan 04 1994 12:18 | 3 |
| But the NFC is going to win the Super Bowl, again.
/Don
|
9.1092 | | METSNY::francus | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Tue Jan 04 1994 12:42 | 5 |
| re: .1091
Don't be so sure about that /er.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1093 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NoTeam-NoBud | Tue Jan 04 1994 13:15 | 3 |
| Want another week of an embarassing P-Name?
/Don
|
9.1094 | | METSNY::francus | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Tue Jan 04 1994 13:17 | 4 |
| How about we wait and see who actually is in the SB and what the spread is.
I seems to recall that you're real big about using the spread.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1095 | Jack Kent Cooke is hiring ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jan 04 1994 13:48 | 10 |
|
Yabbut anybody wanna apply fore the head coach position of the
Redskins? I understand it's vacant.......
I remain,
foist with da nooz?
Kev
|
9.1096 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Tue Jan 04 1994 13:49 | 2 |
| Rumors around here are if Bugel gets axed, JKC will fire/demote Pettibone
and hire him.
|
9.1097 | Norv Turner | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Tue Jan 04 1994 13:53 | 5 |
| I keep hearing rumors that Norv Turner, the Cowboys' O-coordinator,
is high on the list of candidates. I sure hate to see him go, but
wish him well if he does (except when they play the Cowboys, of course).
Jerry
|
9.1098 | Pettibone fired | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Tue Jan 04 1994 15:25 | 18 |
| Article: 7331
From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.virginia+dc,clari.sports.top
Subject: Petitbon fired as Redskins' coach
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 94 10:12:38 PST
WASHINGTON (UPI) -- Richie Petitbon was fired Tuesday as coach of the
Washington Redskins.
The Redskins said that Petitbon was dismissed Tuesday morning after a
meeting with club owner Jack Kent Cooke.
Petitbon took over as coach of the Redskins this season following the
retirement of Joe Gibbs. Washington finished last in the National
Conference East with a 4-12 record, the club's worst finish since 1963.
Washington had problems on offense all season and scored only 230
points, the second lowest total in the league behind the Los Angeles
Rams.
Washington failed to score touchdowns in six games this season.
ccccqqe
|
9.1100 | Snowed in here | PTOVAX::JACOB | Bearded once again | Tue Jan 04 1994 16:05 | 7 |
| I say the Oilscum will advance to the SB fer the firsted tinme in their
history, and will beat the 49ers, and Butthaid Ryan will win the fight that
will be at halftime.
JaKe
|
9.1101 | Glanville fired | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Tue Jan 04 1994 16:24 | 3 |
| Jerry Glanville has been fired in Atlanta.
TTom
|
9.1102 | | METSNY::francus | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Tue Jan 04 1994 16:41 | 10 |
| So was anyone else looney enough to watch the end of last nights
Eagles-49'ers game?
Would have been the first game in 4 years to end in a tie. 49'ers missed a
FG; Eagles missed a FG as time ran out; 49'ers were called for a roughing
the kicker penalty - which btw was after the kick was made. Eagles got one more
play and made the FG. Last thing either team wanted was OT, especially one that
lasted 15 minutes. wierd! at least in SF it was only 9:45 when the game ended.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1103 | Buddy Ryan speaks | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 04 1994 16:51 | 8 |
| Ryan was quoted today on the "fracas"
"I said my part about it last night and that's all I have to say"
"Actions speak louder than words" (As to what he thought of Gilbride's
play calling)
|
9.1104 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Jan 04 1994 17:37 | 9 |
| Didn't see the end Craze, but the Niners SwissChees "D" will
be their undoing.. that and Steve Young's "chicken-bonin" it.
And Buddy Ryan is a flaming idjit even if he can coach. Love to see
him and Ditka go one round (dat's all it would take Iron Mike to put
Buddy on queerstreet).
MikeL
|
9.1105 | Ryan should pull his lower lip up over his haid and swallow | ELMAGO::BENBACA | NO more raises and a 30% paycut | Tue Jan 04 1994 17:43 | 2 |
| Gilbride, had he not been stopped, woulda ripped off Ryan's haid and
S@%& down his neck.
|
9.1106 | Gilbreath a jerk | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dan Reeves mental midget | Wed Jan 05 1994 09:55 | 4 |
|
They ought to send Buddy to Canton.....
mikey
|
9.1107 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Wed Jan 05 1994 09:58 | 4 |
| Why?
Is there a federal prison there?
dr.a
|
9.1108 | 49ers not so hot with watters on the bench... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Jan 05 1994 10:02 | 5 |
| The 49ers lost 3 of there last 4 games, not the way you want
to head into the playoffs. They Need Watters, maybe as much as
dallas needs Emmitt. How did SF do without watters this year
records wise....
Mab
|
9.1109 | Native of OHIO | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Wed Jan 05 1994 11:29 | 3 |
| No, the prison is in Mansfield, OH.
Scott
|
9.1110 | but then Reeves would blow the SB | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dan Reeves mental midget | Wed Jan 05 1994 11:45 | 7 |
|
Watters is back, he scored a TD the other night. Seifert just needs to get
his head out of his butt. He's been playing soft to protect his players.
He better hope it doesn't backfire. Niners are scared to death of the Sowboys.
Only team with a chance to flatten the tires on JJ's caddy is the Giants....
mikey
|
9.1111 | | GWEN::ASHE | Detriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. Champs | Wed Jan 05 1994 13:34 | 4 |
| Lions win their last 2.
Niners lose 3 of 4.
Giants lose their last 2...
|
9.1112 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | MAC IS BACK! | Wed Jan 05 1994 13:38 | 6 |
| >>>Only team with a chance to flatten the tires on JJ's caddy is the Giants....
That's a great commercial.
- Rope
|
9.1113 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dan Reeves mental midget | Wed Jan 05 1994 14:06 | 10 |
|
>>>Only team with a chance to flatten the tires on JJ's caddy is the Giants....
>>> That's a great commercial.
just wish they'd throw JJ out of the driver's seat and let leon Lett
drive....
then we'd be in business
|
9.1114 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 05 1994 15:20 | 4 |
| � Niners lose 3 of 4.
Seifert seemed to rest his starters once the Niners clinched their
division. It will be interesting to see if this strategy backfires.
|
9.1115 | | DECWET::METZGER | Sleep deprivation is a good thing... | Wed Jan 05 1994 19:19 | 16 |
|
9ers defense couldn't stop a local high school team...Just like last year
they've outscored their opposition...Just like last yar the cowboys balanced
offense and defense will take them apart, if they play..
Rookie of the year was Jerome Bettis by a wide margin...I, for the life of me,
can't see why he got the nod over Rick Mirer of the Chickenhawks. Mirereonly
missed 30 or so snaps all season, learned a complex offense from square one,
improved the team dramatically and contributed more to his team in a position
that is much more difficult than Bettis.
The differnce in mental ability required for QB and Rb are so vast in the NFL
that I can't see why Bettis won over Mirer...
Metz
|
9.1116 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Jan 05 1994 19:41 | 10 |
| Geez, Bettis ROY, Mirer 2nd, Reggie Brooks 3rd??
Ah, where's Holtz, ah want to talk with that main.... 8^)
BTW, Niners defense is averaging well over 4+ yards per carry
agin the rush, one of the highest (if not the highest) in the NFL.
Combine that with Young's flinchin', see ya early.
MikeL
|
9.1117 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Wed Jan 05 1994 23:40 | 5 |
| Thanks MikeL I was wondering what was taking you so long to comment on
ROY.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1118 | Metz, you're just a big fat HOMER!!!!!!! ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Jan 06 1994 09:52 | 1 |
|
|
9.1119 | Playoff schedule | LUNER::GROVES | | Thu Jan 06 1994 13:49 | 5 |
|
Can someone enter the playoff schedule for this weekend up to Super
Bowl.
Jim
|
9.1120 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Thu Jan 06 1994 13:53 | 22 |
| >
> Can someone enter the playoff schedule for this weekend up to Super
> Bowl.
I think that the weeks after this are somewhat determined by who wins
this week.
This weekend I know
Saturday 1pm Detroit v Green Bay
Saturday 4pm Denver v LA Raiders
Sunday 1pm Minnesota v NY Giants
Sunday 4pm Pittsburgh v KC
Course I could be all wet....8^)
'Saw
|
9.1121 | | LUNER::GROVES | | Thu Jan 06 1994 14:06 | 9 |
|
'Saw,
Thanks for this weeks schedule, but I was looking for the entire
schedule. I know it depends upon who wins, but I was lokking for that
type of schedule. Ex: If G.B. wins, it plays Dallas and if Detroit wins
it plays S.F......
|
9.1122 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Thu Jan 06 1994 14:17 | 38 |
|
Saturday 1pm Detroit v Green Bay
Saturday 4pm Denver v LA Raiders
Sunday 1pm Minnesota v NY Giants
Sunday 4pm Pittsburgh v KC
Okay.
Next week
If Detroit wins: {NY Giants or Minn} v Dallas
Detroit v San Fran
If Green Bay wins
and NY wins : Green bay v Dallas
NY Giants v San Fran
If Green Bay wins
and Minn Wins : Minn v Dallas
Green Bay v San Fran
If KC wins {Denver or LA} v Buffalo
KC v. Houston
Don't know the seedings to figure the rest of it...
This is just a best guess....
'saw
|
9.1123 | | GWEN::ASHE | Detriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. Champs | Thu Jan 06 1994 15:42 | 2 |
| Det-GB is Sat. at 4...
|
9.1124 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Bearded once again | Thu Jan 06 1994 15:45 | 6 |
| The STEELERS .vs. KC is Saturday at 12:30.
Schnorttt Schittt SChleppps
JaKe
|
9.1125 | | CAMONE::WAY | You can't polish a turd | Thu Jan 06 1994 15:54 | 3 |
| Okay, so I made a mistake. Sue me.
8^)
|
9.1126 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Bearded once again | Thu Jan 06 1994 15:54 | 7 |
| I'll have my attorney contact yer attorney. Ya gots good insurance????
We can split the proceeds if'n ya want!!
(8^)*
JaKe
|
9.1127 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Thu Jan 06 1994 16:00 | 1 |
| They're expecting 12� weather in KC for the wildcard game.
|
9.1128 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Bearded once again | Thu Jan 06 1994 16:02 | 8 |
|
>>They're expecting 12� weather in KC for the wildcard game.
Hope it snows like hell, too. The STEELERS are, traditionally, a very
good "poor weather" team.
JaKe
|
9.1129 | HTH :*) | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Thu Jan 06 1994 16:03 | 7 |
| The Vikes-Giants game is 12:30 eastern on Sunday as well.
Not looking to sue you Frank, just don't want anyone to miss the first
quarter.
Spud
|
9.1130 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NoTeam-NoBud | Thu Jan 06 1994 17:06 | 6 |
| I like...
Green Bay +1� over Detriot�
Kansas City -8� over PittsburgH
Denver +2 over Los Angeles
New York -6� over Minnesota
|
9.1131 | | METSNY::francus | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Thu Jan 06 1994 17:15 | 8 |
| I would go with
Detroit +1.5 over GB
Pittsburgh +8.5 over KC (but KC wins the game)
Denver +2 over LA
Minnesota +6.5 over NY (NY wins the game)
The Crazy Met
|
9.1132 | KC,GB,NYG,LA - using those spreads | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jan 06 1994 17:24 | 1 |
|
|
9.1134 | | METSNY::francus | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Mon Jan 10 1994 09:54 | 4 |
| Cowboys luck out with GB win. Now they only need to play NY or SF
and not both.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1136 | | USCTR1::KING | | Mon Jan 10 1994 11:55 | 8 |
| 2 things I would like to see changed in the NFL....
1. Bring back the 2 point conversion...
2. Move the yard markers back out ( I think that is what you call
them), this will bring back the short side of the field and help stop
so many field goals...
REK
|
9.1137 | you forgot one | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:05 | 4 |
|
3....bring back instant replay!
hw
|
9.1138 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:06 | 9 |
| > So much for all of the brilliant ideas on how to improve pro
> football. Two weeks of truly exceptional games in a row and we still
> have a bunch more football to play. Obviously, all that was needed to
> add excitement was games with something big on the line which, of
> course, will be the case for the next three weeks.
I was thinking it was just another case of the SI cover jinx.
brews
|
9.1139 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:10 | 38 |
|
I don't the game needs to be changed.
My opinion is the folks responsible are really looking
for a way to prostitute the NFL to be more palatable for
a TV presentation.
It used to be teams had 3 timeouts per half, and that's when
the networks went to commercials.
Then, it was one TV timeout each half.
I believe we now get 3 or 4 TV timeouts per half, along with
the teams timeouts. Monday Night Football is atrocious about
this. After a score of any kind, they go to commercials, come
back to show the ensuing kickoff, only to go to back to a TV timeout.
What we have now is a loss of continuation in the game, which
is what most of us consider boring. It's start.stop.start.stop.start
etc...
The only times we don't get the constant stoppage of play is when the
game is a total blowout, and going to a commercial will cause viewers
to say "might as well turn it off."
Look for those in charge to add another TV timeout per half to
college hoops, perhaps more timeouts to college football
as well, and then complain that these games are boring as well.
In addition to those problems, saturation of the market is
responsible as well. We now have NFL football all day and night on
Sunday, and a game on Monday night. Saturdays and Thursday night
we have college ball. That leaves us with Tuesdays, Wednesdays
and Fridays with no football. Won't be long till we
have some kind of games on Friday nite also.
STeve
|
9.1140 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:11 | 11 |
| I think that they should go back to the 45 second play clock.
Of any change they made that probably adversely affected the game more than
any other....
As the 2 point conversion, I don't believe that there ever was a 2point
conversion in the pros (perhaps in the old AFL) but not in the NFL....
'Saw
|
9.1141 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:16 | 7 |
| Anyone see the SNL skit on FOX doing football? It was funny.
(That was only thing REMOTELY funny on this past episode. It was the
lamest episode of SNL I've ever seen. Even the Coffee Talk sketch sucked.
'Saw
|
9.1142 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:36 | 4 |
| � 2. Move the yard markers back out ( I think that is what you call
� them),
They're called hash marks.
|
9.1143 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:49 | 3 |
| Anyone else see Offsides on the Comedy Central last night? It's a
collaboration between NFL Films and Comedy Central. It wasn't
outrageously funny, but it did show some great highlights.
|
9.1144 | SNL did suck | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Sales gets commisions we get "JACK" | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:39 | 4 |
| Like perry and John Madden doing a halftime show. "You just do understand me
old man". Richard Lewis and Don Rickles covering a game was funny as well.
Jeff
|
9.1145 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Jan 10 1994 15:37 | 8 |
| Why bring back the 45 second clock? It used to be 30 before 45.
Christensen kept bellyachen about it yesterday. He played when it was
30 seconds.
Teams did ok with 30sec. They just want 45 so they can bring in 8
different people for 1 play....
Tim
|
9.1146 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Mon Jan 10 1994 17:04 | 7 |
|
Yabbut, I think they started the 30 second clock at a different time.
Didn't they wait until the ref spotted the ball before it began,
whereas with the 40/45 second clock it is started when the previous
play is whistled dead.
brews
|
9.1147 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Mon Jan 10 1994 18:48 | 7 |
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't this year's playoffs have/had all of
the teams who have lost the most SBs: Denver, Minny, Buffalo, Cowboys,
Raiders? Only other team that I can think of with multiple losses is
Miami and Cinci.
brews
|
9.1148 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Jan 10 1994 21:52 | 3 |
| re-2
Your right, it was started when the ball is spotted...
|
9.1149 | Open up the darn game wiya... | SALEM::STIG | | Tue Jan 11 1994 08:54 | 6 |
| re .1136. I agree Rick. I also think they should allow the one foot in
bounds rule on the receiving end. This would open up the game more. I'm
just sick of the low scoring (boring) games. The game NEEDS to be more
exciting!!!
stig
|
9.1150 | Emmitt Smith named MVP | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 11 1994 12:36 | 4 |
| Well, Emmit Smith may not have been named the MVP for the first half of
the season (and I recall at least one person who said he didn't deserve
it anyway), but Emmit came up with the one that counts -- the one
awarded at the end of the season.
|
9.1152 | Teams have won without great RB too; maybe no such thing | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 13:18 | 17 |
|
In Thurman Thomas the Bills were also supposedly bringing the best
all-around back over the past three years, with the possible
exception of last year with Emmitt. The Redskins and Giants certainly
didn't have anyone who was close to his equal. You can't generalize
and claim that a single player at either (or any) position is the one
most likely to be a "franchise player", if there even is such a thing
(can a team have two "franchise" players"?-- this may be a semantical
argument). Obviously balance wins out. But as opposed to other
positions, I think you have to have a high-quality player at at least
one of the positions of QB or RB. No great statement here, otherwise
you don't have an offense; but can you make this claim with any other
two single positions on the field, like saying that you have to have a
left tackle and a middle linebacker? I don't think so...
glenn
|
9.1154 | Absolutely... it's only one player out of 22 positions... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 14:04 | 23 |
|
> They may not have had any one person who was Thurman Thomas' equal but
> they accomplished the same thing with three players instead of one. The
> Redskin's won it with a decnt Mark Rypien, a solid running game and
> a great defense. Is there a pattern here? (HINT: running game and great
> defense). Quarterback is an overrated position.
I agree with everything you've said but don't come to the same final
conclusion on QBs (for the same reason that I thought that the Pats
should draft Drew Bledsoe-- there were no great running backs
available to them-- with the *one* very high pick they owned). When
you establish this pattern by looking at one player, quarterback (it
could be running back, for that matter) versus a defense and a running
game, you're comparing one position on the field against perhaps a dozen
standout players at various positions. There may be some that believe
that a QB can win out against those odds but I'm not one of them. Like
I said, it may be semantics (overrated is relative to the level that
you think QBs are rated), but QB is still a very important position in
the NFL. You don't have to have a great one but you have to have
solid, consistent play at the position, the more productive the better...
glenn
|
9.1155 | | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Tue Jan 11 1994 15:59 | 8 |
| I get your point, Tommy, and I couldn't agree more. Given the
choice, with all other things equal, of the best quarterback in
the league or the best running back in the league, I'll take
the RB anytime. The solid defense is a must no matter which of
these two you have.
billl
|
9.1157 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 11 1994 16:14 | 5 |
| >> In Thurman Thomas the Bills were also supposedly bringing the best
>> all-around back over the past three years,
And add in highly rated QB Jim Kelly and it makes you wonder why the
Bills are 0-3 in the big one.
|
9.1158 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Tue Jan 11 1994 16:15 | 15 |
|
and the 49ers won a myriad of super bowls with a great QB, great WR's and a
respectable defense...BFD....
The best team wins...and running backs are only as good as their offensive
line. Do ya think Emmitt Smith would be the MVP of the league if he was
running behind the line of the Colts or the Bengals? Is it coincidence that
Barry Foster's or Barry sanders backups can step in and have a couple of 100
yards games when the starters get hurt?
Speaking of MVPs Did anybody catch Brews Smith mouthing off that he should have
been the defensive players of the year? What a pompous ass.....I'd like to see
a Buffalo - Dallas rematch this year with the same results...
Metz
|
9.1160 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 11 1994 17:05 | 25 |
|
>> (overrated is relative to the level that you think QBs are rated),
>
> One need only look at what players at various positions are paid
> to see where QBs are rated. Smith had to scrape to get close to
> what he's worth. Jones is already bending over backwards for Aikman.
> QBs have always been the highest paid players on the field.
Yeah, this much is very true, and if you go by salary it's unfair.
Emmitt Smith got screwed over good by Jerry Jones, and I don't
believe for a minute that this $40M lifetime contract that Aikman
signed was entirely the result of the new TV deal.
I wasn't thinking of this strictly in terms of Smith vs. Aikman, but I
do think you have to give Aikman his due. They're both great players
and I don't think the Cowboys win it all without either. I can't go
along with the generalization that it's been the AFC teams with the
superior QBs in recent Super Bowls, though, not even with Aikman vs.
Kelly and certainly not all those years of Montana vs. anybody. When
you look at what he's had to work with and what he's produced when the
pressure has fallen on him, Jim Kelly, sure, he's overrated (at least
Elway has some right to the excuse that he's had to do it all).
glenn
|
9.1161 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Tue Jan 11 1994 17:06 | 19 |
| respectable, adequate, whatever...The point still remains that the best team
wins....
The reasons QB's get so much more $$$ than running backs is because they are
required to think. The Qb is in charge of the team, has to read the defense,
decide what reciever to throw the ball to and avoid mistakes. It's a hell of a
lot more responsibility than getting the ball handed to you and then trying to
avoid being tackled...
A Qb that avoids mistakes is almost as valuable as one that makes great plays.
One that can execute mentally as well as athletically is worth every penney
they get payed in inflated NFL sports dollars...
With added responsibility comes added bonus ($$$$$$)....Uor paper had a good
article a few weeks ago on the number of decisions an NFL QB has to make each
play (esp passing situations)...It's pretty staggering and I'm amazed that more
passes don't get picked off due to a miscommunication between receiver and QB.
Metz
|
9.1162 | Eligible Underclassmen | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 12 1994 10:39 | 46 |
| <<< LMOADM::LP$DISK:[NOTES$LIBRARY]NEW_ENGLAND_PATRIOTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< New England Patriots (volume V) >-
================================================================================
Note 54.416 NFL Draft 416 of 416
ONE800::AREANO 38 lines 12-JAN-1994 08:59
-< final list of eligible underclassmen >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full list of underclassmen:
Clingler, Jimmy QB Houston
Dilfer, Trent QB Fresno State
Shuler, Heath QB Tennessee
Bates, Mario RB Arizona State
Bennett, Donnell RB Miami
Bostic, James RB Auburn
Faulk, Marshall RB S.D. State
Floyd, William FB Florida State
Hill, Greg RB Texas A&M
Jones, Calvin RB Nebraska
Levy, Charles RB Arizona
McFadden, Dwight RB USC
Morris, Byron RB Texas Tech
Warren, Lamont RB Colorado
Woodard, Rodney RB West Virginia
Lewis, Thomas WR Indiana
Palmer, David WR Alabama
Scott, Darnay WR S.D. State
Ofodile, A.J. TE Missouri
Hegamin, George OT N.C. State
Adams, Sam DE Texas A&M
Bowens, Tim DT Mississippi
Walker, Bruce DT UCLA
Johnson, Joe DE Louisville
Wilkinson, Dan DE Ohio State
Miller, Jamir LB UCLA
Harrison, Rodney DB Western Illinois
Goodwin, Marvin S UCLA
Sawyer, Corey CB Florida State
|
9.1164 | Misc. | STRATA::BARBIERI | God can be so appreciated! | Wed Jan 12 1994 11:55 | 19 |
| So Stokes at UCLA is staying??? Too bad for New England. If
I was them, I'd have nabbed him in a second.
Tom, I think you underestimate what a QB needs to know (at least
in some systems).
I know that Brett Favre said he has something like 136 pass
plays to know and he sometimes feels like its overwhelming. I
know that the 49'er offense takes years to learn and a watered
down version is used at first because its simply too much to
take in in one year.
While I appreciate that its a gift to be able to see laterally
and choose the right hole, I'd still say that it is quite demanding
to have to read a defense and sometimes check a first, second, and
third potential receiver - all in ~2.7 seconds. Its a kind of
skill some qb's never master.
Tony
|
9.1165 | Give Steve Young his just due | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Gentleness overcomes strength | Wed Jan 12 1994 12:43 | 8 |
| Tommy, I also agree with your basic premise, but I see no reason for
you to denigrate Steve Young's accomplishments by calling him a
journeyman quarterback. He was, after all, the NFL's VMP in 1992 and
had another outstanding season this year. Babe Laufenberg is a
journeyman quarterback, as is Hugh Millen, but certainly not Steve
Young.
NAZZ
|
9.1166 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Whitewater/Whitewash | Wed Jan 12 1994 12:44 | 3 |
| Steve Young was in his element in the USFL.
/Don
|
9.1168 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:00 | 6 |
| Young played only at Tampa Bay in the NFL, before he got splinter
butt at San Fran.
Hth
Tim
|
9.1169 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:03 | 9 |
| �There was one play in the GB-Lions game
� where the Sanders got the ball, started left, the wall of blockers caved
� in and in a split second Sanders reversed directions hit a hole and ran
� for 20 someodd yards. It's one thing to be able to change directions
� that quickly, but he also had to process all of the info he was being
� bombarded with in an instant and make a decision and then act on that
� decision and make a bunch more decisions every step of the way.
Is that intelligence or survival instinct?
|
9.1170 | crybabie extrordinaire | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:07 | 10 |
| >> So Stokes at UCLA is staying??? Too bad for New England. If
>> I was them, I'd have nabbed him in a second.
Tony, is Stokes #18 (or was it #19)? I was really getting fed
up with his CONSTANT moaning and groaning after every dropped
pass in the Rose Bowl. I kinda wished that his coach would grab
ahold of his face mask and give him the old "Woody Hayes" treatment.
billl
|
9.1171 | A Great QB/RB combo seems to be the trick :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:09 | 28 |
| Both the RB and QB are important but I still cant say that Dallas
would be better off with Emmitt over Aikman. Look at some of the
other top RB's in the league, Thomas, he has kelly and its been
enough to get to the big dance but not win. Of course Emmitt/aikman
are a little better then Thomas/Kelly. Then The Barry's both play
on teams that have had QB problems and neither has got anywere in
the playoffs. The Giants are doing it with Hampton/Simms. The Best
Teams seem to have a great QB/RB Combination. If you had to rate the
top 5 or 6 teams would they be
Aikman/Emmitt
Young/Watters
Simms/Hampton
Kelly/Thomas
Moon/Brown (was white)
Montana/Allen
GB doesnt have the RB to go with the QB neither does the Raiders, does
anyone feel that either RB or the Raiders have a legit shot at going
all the way. Actually of you look at the above list every team also
has 1 or 2 great WR's, and some pretty decent TE's as well.... You need
the all around package. 4 or 5 of the abover teams have a great shot
at making it too and winning the SB and they all have good all around
teams....
WIll be intresting to see who (and how) teams go down this weekend...
MaB
|
9.1172 | Got one on my desk | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:09 | 18 |
| >> where the Sanders got the ball, started left, the wall of blockers caved
>> in and in a split second Sanders reversed directions hit a hole and ran
>> for 20 someodd yards. It's one thing to be able to change directions
>> that quickly, but he also had to process all of the info he was being
>> bombarded with in an instant and make a decision and then act on that
>> decision and make a bunch more decisions every step of the way.
I remember that. That was when we were testing our new ALPHelmet�
It was a prototype helmet that contained an ALPHA chip, specifically
dedicated to 'realtime processing."
Didn't pan out though, cuz it was then tested on a QB and there
wasn't any input to process, i.e. no decisions to be made.
|
9.1173 | There may be other options at WR... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:22 | 25 |
|
> Tony, is Stokes #18 (or was it #19)? I was really getting fed
> up with his CONSTANT moaning and groaning after every dropped
> pass in the Rose Bowl. I kinda wished that his coach would grab
> ahold of his face mask and give him the old "Woody Hayes" treatment.
He took a stupid penalty on UCLA's first drive, too, perhaps costing
them a chance at a TD by taking a swipe at a guy. You never know; maybe
staying another year isn't a bad idea for Stokes. I read a feature on
Stokes earlier this year where it was mentioned that he barely has one
year's experience (didn't even play much last year) and one of the
reasons the coaches gave for that was his immaturity. He really has
been a surprise, not playing much in high school and not being highly
recruited, and almost came out of nowhere this season. I would have
guessed that with Stokes' kind of demonstrated immense talent, college
experience would be a very secondary consideration and that he'd have
come out, but then again sometimes talent alone doesn't make it, either.
Another guy worth watching is USC's WR Johnny Morton, who outgained
Stokes by almost 300 yards in the Pac-10 this year. He's not as big
as Stokes (who is?) but he's faster. Not sure that he's worth a #4
pick, though...
glenn
|
9.1174 | Sanders and His Incredible Skill | STRATA::BARBIERI | God can be so appreciated! | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:25 | 34 |
| Billl,
#18. Yeah, he whined like mad. The first time was his first
reception, but I'm not sure his complaining was excessive as
it almost looked to me like the Wisconsin defensive back tried
to wrench his leg after pulling Stokes by it out of bounds.
But, yes, he did whine quite a bit.
Stokes has it all though. The only question mark might be
durability. He looks pretty wiry.
Tom,
I don't know what it is that enables one to be able to do what
Sanders can do. I would call it genius of some nature. He's
the only guy that I've seen save perhaps Eric Metcalfe (though
much less strong) who has moves like my favorite running back
of all time - Gayle Sayers. Man, can Sanders move!
I could literally puke (well, I'm exagerrating) that the Pack
lost him in the draft. Its old news, but they HAD to win their
last game and lose their rights to Aikmen. They went on to draft
Mandarich and we know the rest; Lions - Sanders, Chiefs - Derrick
Thomas.
To be fair, George Young said that any GM that says they would
not have drafted Mandarich when Green Bay did would be lying
through their teeth.
But...the Pack could have had Sanders and instead they have someone
who ain't around anymore.
Tony
|
9.1176 | What does Brown think he is? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:53 | 13 |
|
> They'll either take one later in the draft or go the free agent
> route (Tim Brown, please!).
Al Davis says that he doesn't understand all the talk around Tim Brown
because he's been designated as a transition player, is only a
restricted free agent and that they'll match any offers. I don't
understand the system well enough to know why there's confusion here.
Maybe Davis is playing fast and loose with the rules again?
glenn
|
9.1177 | Machete my patootie | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:55 | 4 |
| Did Marshall Faulk officially declare. I saw one item which said he
hadn't made it official and I never caught, from the various list,
exactly when he did officially send the letter.
|
9.1178 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 15:09 | 11 |
| I had this scary thought.....
There's a bunch of commercials out there, for some product that hasn't
mananged to catch my attention, featuring Downtown Julie Brown and
different football players.
Whenever I see those commercials, I get this fear that I'm seeing a
preview of Fox's NFC coverage.....
'Saw
|
9.1179 | It's already here, Saw... Fox will have to top it... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 16:14 | 17 |
|
> I had this scary thought.....
>
> There's a bunch of commercials out there, for some product that hasn't
> mananged to catch my attention, featuring Downtown Julie Brown and
> different football players.
>
> Whenever I see those commercials, I get this fear that I'm seeing a
> preview of Fox's NFC coverage.....
Unfortunately, it seems as if she's under contract with ABC/ESPN and
is already doing taped halftime interviews for Sunday and Monday
nights. "Weww, Seth, evewyone says that you're a tough guy... but is
there a sensitive side to Seth Joyner underneath?" Nauseating...
glenn
|
9.1180 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 12 1994 16:58 | 4 |
| � Both the RB and QB are important but I still cant say that Dallas
� would be better off with Emmitt over Aikman.
The AP and Dallas' W/L record say you're wrong.
|
9.1181 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 12 1994 17:13 | 7 |
| � Did Marshall Faulk officially declare. I saw one item which said he
� hadn't made it official and I never caught, from the various list,
� exactly when he did officially send the letter.
The list posted by Paul Areano and copied here by moi is (according to
Paul anyway), the final and official list. I don't know what his
source is. I just lifted his reply from the Patriot's notesfile.
|
9.1182 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:35 | 4 |
| Anyone know what time the SB starts? I gotta go to LA that Sunday and
need to make plane reservations.
brews
|
9.1183 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:38 | 7 |
|
Yabbut isn't the kick-off historically either ~6:00PM EST or ~8:00EST?
does that help?
|
9.1184 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:41 | 12 |
| > Yabbut isn't the kick-off historically either ~6:00PM EST or ~8:00EST?
>
> does that help?
Kev, you can't use the term "historically" or "history" in this conference
without your opinion being called into serious question.....
hth,
'Saw
|
9.1185 | What are you? Playing StFM????? Who says I can't? ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:43 | 1 |
|
|
9.1186 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:48 | 6 |
| > -< What are you? Playing StFM????? Who says I can't? ;^) >-
I'm just looking out for your best interests......8^)
|
9.1187 | This is good a place as any for picks (pool???) | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:53 | 19 |
| Well here are my four picks - I can't find where last weeks were
entered; probably in the softball note
Buff giving 6.5
Giants with 8
Green bay w 14
KC with 7
It's going to be Colllllllllllld in buff; I was there 12/26 (not at
jets game, just drove by)(*)
Houston seems to have a problem with receivers.
49ers defense is suspect - can they keep g'nts off the field?
14 is high, depends on gb mistakes or lack thereof
(*) Has it ever been noted that province of Ontario has a sports
lottery?
|
9.1189 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:07 | 4 |
| Super Bowl starts at 6PM EST
The Crazy Met
|
9.1190 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:12 | 3 |
| > Super Bowl starts at 6PM EST
But the pre-game festivities probably start around noon.....8^)
|
9.1191 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:15 | 5 |
|
Thanks guys. Guess I'm spending the SB in a hotel with a bunch of DEC
employees. Oh boy.
brews
|
9.1192 | | SKEWED::MCKAY | | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:18 | 5 |
| correction:
I guess you'll be spending the super bowl in the hotel LOUNGE
with a bunch of DEc employees!!!!
Jimbo
|
9.1193 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:20 | 12 |
| > I guess you'll be spending the super bowl in the hotel LOUNGE
> with a bunch of DEc employees!!!!
>
> Jimbo
If I know Brews, what will happen is that Hooters will be having a convention
in that hotel, that week. He'll be in the hotel Lounge with
Hooters Girls and DEC Employees.....
'Saw
|
9.1194 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:59 | 4 |
| Does Brews next door neighbor work at Hooters? :-)
The Crazy Met
|
9.1195 | More predictions | CADSYS::CAVE | | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:06 | 29 |
|
Houston (-7)
The Oilers are playing excellent ball and their pressure D
will knock Montana out before halftime.
Giants (+7)
I can invision a straightout Giant victory with their offensive
line dominating the game and keeping the 49ers offense off the field.
Although, the injury to the Giants CB (forgot his name) could be a
big factor.
Bill (+10)
I would normally take the Raiders with their strong D and speedy
receivers but it will be FRIGID this week-end. Do they play Sat or
Sun. I know on Sunday the temps in Boston will be 0-10 with wind chill
of below 40. The cold and wind will eliminate the passing game and
the Raiders Ofensive will stall.
Packers (+14)
Only because the Cowboys are banged up and 14 is a lot of
points.
Alan
|
9.1196 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Patriot Games? | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:08 | 6 |
| I like all the favorites this weekend with one exception. Eight
points is way to much to be giving DAN REEVES and the Giants. By the
way Brews, glad to see you shed that baby blue image and pay off your
P-Name bet. Congrats!
/Don
|
9.1197 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:37 | 10 |
| > By the way Brews, glad to see you shed that baby blue image and pay
> off your P-Name bet. Congrats!
I've been busy this week, and haven't been able to note as often as
usual, so I may have to keep the pname for a bit longer than a week, if
that's OK with you.
brews
|
9.1198 | No problem B.O.S.S. | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Patriot Games? | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:57 | 1 |
|
|
9.1199 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Fri Jan 14 1994 14:05 | 4 |
|
Thanks, I'm just trying to shed my UNC ways.
brews
|
9.1200 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 14 1994 14:40 | 5 |
| Imus' brother Fred made football picks this morning. Only memorable one
was Oilers over KC. "Montana is missing his 2 weapons, Rice and Tayolr"
The Crazy Met
|
9.1201 | Even at his age, Dean still gits up for big games. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jan 14 1994 14:45 | 8 |
| How are Bobbit & Deano coming up "short" brews? Dean just won his 2nd
Title and, as far as we know, Bobbit is functioning normally again and
will in all likelihood git to see his wife sent to the Big House.
Haw!
- ACC Chris
|
9.1202 | I would think Dean & Friends would be lying low this week | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:26 | 1 |
|
|
9.1203 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Patriot Games? | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:33 | 4 |
| Hey ACC is right. Deano did display a Bobbit like response the
other night.
/Don
|
9.1204 | you'll be sued fer slander!! | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:40 | 5 |
| Ya mean he went out with the Marines and drank B52's and came home
to Mrs Dean and.....tsk tsk. Sacrilege Slash!!
MikeL
|
9.1205 | not that I've ever had any... | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Fri Jan 14 1994 16:09 | 12 |
| >> Ya mean he went out with the Marines and drank B52's and came home
Now that's one mean thing to spend the night slamming down....
(the B52's not the Marines)
Kahlua, Baileys & 151 Rum all layered in a shot glass, put the
whole mess in your mouth. Don't forget to swish before swallowing!
Yahooo!
billl
|
9.1206 | | GWEN::ASHE | No one here 'cept us chickens... | Fri Jan 14 1994 16:45 | 2 |
| I may be out in California SB Sunday too..
|
9.1207 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Fri Jan 14 1994 19:20 | 6 |
|
Northern or Southern?
You're younger than me? sheeesh, I'd never guess.
brews
|
9.1208 | | SALEM::DODA | Ok, jokes over, bring back Bush | Sun Jan 16 1994 19:43 | 3 |
| Has a Run N' Shoot team ever won a playoff game?
daryll
|
9.1209 | Thoughts on the week-end | CADSYS::CAVE | | Sun Jan 16 1994 20:23 | 21 |
|
I would have laid a goose egg on my picks if not for the useless
last minute TD by the Packers. I was very surprised by the 49ers. They
were the best team by far this week-end and looked like the old 49er teams
with great balance on both sides of the ball. It will be a very interesting
game next week in Dallas.
The KC game was another big surprise for me. Although I'm a big
Montana fan, I hope we all realize KC won because of their defense. In fact,
I feel Montana did NOT play well regardless of his reasonable numbers. He
threw two bad interceptions and underthrew open receivers on the bomb three
times. He also underthrew Birden? on third TD but the receiver turned back to
make an excellent catch. The final big play was the reception by the tight
end and a critical 3rd and 1 (KC had a 1 point lead with 2 1/2 minutes left)
where Montana was hit as he threw it and put it up for grabs. To his
credit he did have a perfectly thrown bomb dropped that would have been a
sure TD. I was suprised they didn't use Allen more (15 carries/75 yards but
only 1 or 2 receptions). He seemed to be effective when they gave him a
chance and that final TD was beautiful.
|
9.1210 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 17 1994 00:57 | 11 |
| I'm pretty sure Detroit won a game with the Run 'n shoot.
Both the Packers and KC had chances in the 1st half of their games. KC
was good enought to make up for it in the 2nd half. GB wasn't quite
good enough, though take away that incerdible mistake just before the
half and that game could have gone down to the wire.
The same 2 teams could both be in consecutive SB's for the first time.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1211 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 17 1994 00:58 | 6 |
| Now we know that Doc Midnight won't be totally insufferable for the
next year. All that has to happen to make it a decent ending for the
season is for Dallas to lose.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1212 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Mon Jan 17 1994 08:47 | 4 |
| Biggest laugh I had all weekend was when #89 for KC gunned a bullet
into Buddy's mug after scoring a touchdown.
Steve
|
9.1213 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 17 1994 08:49 | 9 |
| I was rollward after the game. Worn Moon looked pathetic, choking again
in the clutch.
Joe Montana ripped apart the vaunted Buddy Ryan defense with impunity.
Great game....
'Saw
|
9.1214 | Giants looked sick | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Jan 17 1994 08:54 | 14 |
|
Great weekend of football. I guess Buddy gets shaddaped by his
own defense. HAHAHA. I agree that Montana did not look all that
great but the Chiefs did win. Doesn't look as like Joe can throw
the long one anymore. He was woefully short on several tosses.
Anyone see the inflammation in Montana's right elbow? Damn that bursa
sac problem he has looked sickening. Damn that protuberance was so
big it reminded me of Buddy Ryan's bony ridge whar his forehaid should
be..
8^)
MikeL
|
9.1215 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 17 1994 09:00 | 11 |
| > <<< Note 9.1214 by CTHQ::LEARY "Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions" >>>
> -< Giants looked sick >-
Pretty indicative of a team running out of gas a couple of weeks too
early...8^)
'Saw
|
9.1217 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Jan 17 1994 09:22 | 7 |
| Yabbut Tommy,
You know Buddy will be blaming the run and shoot for putting his
blessed "d" in precarious field position. How many times did
Moon fumble?
MikeL
|
9.1219 | | GWEN::ASHE | Thank you Dr. King. | Mon Jan 17 1994 09:43 | 11 |
| Dr. said it was expected... pulled defeat out of the jaws of victory.
Also told me some "rest of the story" stuff on Mr. Alm. He and the guy
(according to Doc's sources in Houston) were REAL close and at the time
of the accident were a) drunk and b) finding some intimate ways of
distracting Alm while he was driving which led to the car going out of
control. Knowing what happened to his buddy and what the traces of
either fluids or worse were on him... Mr. Alm didn't want to deal with
the NFL and the good ol' boy attitude in Houston, Mr. Alm didn't want
to deal with the scandals and ended it. This is all alleged and came
from Doc's friends in Houston.
|
9.1220 | Get ready for Buffalo (fine with me) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 17 1994 09:47 | 29 |
|
> The KC game was another big surprise for me. Although I'm a big
> Montana fan, I hope we all realize KC won because of their defense. In fact,
> I feel Montana did NOT play well regardless of his reasonable numbers.
I agree. The Montana deification continues, but I don't think I've
ever seen so much good come out of so many badly underthrown balls.
Houston's defenders couldn't cover and then after they got burned and
Joe gave them reprieves they couldn't find the ball. I think Jack
Pardee may have earned the right from this one to take a swing at both
Buddy and Gilbrade, 'cept for the fact that Pardee doesn't seem to have
a clue himself what it is that a head coach is supposed to do. Just
another in a long line of heartaches for the Oilers. Couldn't have
happened to a nicer bunch of guys.
Looks like Buffalo's going back to the Super Bowl to me (KC's defense
was incredible this week but that hasn't been the norm, and Buffalo is
just stronger all the way around). If they do there'll be a lot more
of this moaning and groaning from the sarcastic media types but the
fact is that Buffalo still has the best shot from the AFC to win it all,
and are always capable of beating anyone. As long as it's a reasonably
decent game, I think Buffalo coming off the deck to finally win it all
*or* dropping a 4th straight Super Bowl is a good story either way. I
don't know who'll win the NFC but I don't see Kansas City putting up
enough of a battle either way. Beating Houston was heroic enough but
Dallas and San Fran are another level up...
glenn
|
9.1221 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:06 | 4 |
| �Has a Run N' Shoot team ever won a playoff game?
A heavy portion of the 3-time AFC Champion Buffalo Bills' offense is
patterned after the R&S.
|
9.1222 | Good AFC games the last 2 days. NFC was boring | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:09 | 22 |
| I think both games next weekend will be great to watch. PLEASE NO
BUFFALO IN SB!!!
I did get tired of the spewing over Montana yesterday. Yes he threw
some good balls that were dropped (the wide open TD), but in the 4th,
it was the recievers that did the work, not Joe. That elbow is naurly
lookin'.
I feel KC stands a good chance to beat anyone as long as their
defense plays like they did yesterday.
The DAN REEVES coached team looked like the donks of old, ie getting
blown out. Of course it would have been great to see the jints get
beat in the SB.
This could be #5 for 9'rs. I want to see AFC win, but inconsistent
offense by both Bills and Chiefs (whomever goes) will be the demize.
Niether team seem to get motivated until 3rd qtr, and usually in the
SB, its over by then....
Tim
|
9.1223 | No D in 2nd half | BUMP::MMARLAND | | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:22 | 14 |
| Wow , what are the 2ns half stats for the Oilers in their last two games.
Scored what 10 points and given up 62. Yikes....
I jave a feeling the Bills are going to win it all. They are bigger up front
than the Chiefs and Kelly is a little bit more mobil than Moon. The R&G just
doesn't hold up under a strong pass rush. I like the 9'ers over the Boys in a
close game. The Niner D will decide this game. They were porous the last 3/4
games but played big on Sat.
Joe v Steve would be classic though.
Mike
|
9.1224 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:44 | 17 |
| re: .1222
The pot calling the kettle black! Would you say the same thing about the
Broncos and the SB??
Some real good SB storylines:
Buffalo vs. Dallas - again
Buffalo vs. SF -- a team tha can't win the big one against a team that is 4-4
KC vs anyone - Montana back again, against SF Montana vs. Young, against
Dallas - the old warrior vs. the young turk.
NBC can't lose on the hype.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1226 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:57 | 3 |
| what are the point spreads for next Sunday's games??
The Crazy Met
|
9.1228 | quite ironic | FRETZ::HEISER | RUN! Lorena has the gavel! | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:05 | 1 |
| I'd love to see Super Joe face his old team.
|
9.1229 | | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:08 | 13 |
| Wow! I can't believe KC pulled it out again! After putting in a
12 hour day on Saturday I just couldn't stay awake past halftime.
Ryan's defense looked totally in control. They realy clobbered
Montana several times. I figured there was no way he would
finish the game.
There were a couple passes in the first quarter, I think, where
the KC receivers got a case of "Bledsoe Arms". If he would have
only extended them he was off to races.
billl
|
9.1230 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:11 | 7 |
| TCM, whatta guy. Extracting happiness out of the misfortunes of
others. You should seek professional help.
�Joe Montana ripped apart the vaunted Buddy Ryan defense with impunity.
I didn't see the game, but according to the AP writeup, Joe wasn't that
impressive.
|
9.1231 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:15 | 5 |
| �Pretty indicative of a team running out of gas a couple of weeks too
�early...8^)
Nexted thing you know, 'Saw's going to be telling us something about
exams, hot teams, and freak injuries.
|
9.1233 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:30 | 5 |
| > I didn't see the game, but according to the AP writeup, Joe wasn't that
> impressive.
No, but his receivers were.....
|
9.1234 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:31 | 9 |
| > Nexted thing you know, 'Saw's going to be telling us something about
> exams, hot teams, and freak injuries.
Gee, if that's the case then those Patsies with the lousy uniforms and dump
of a stadium must've had some awfully tough exams and lots of freak
injuries this year.
Where were they Saturday? Packing for St. Louis?
|
9.1235 | | FRETZ::HEISER | RUN! Lorena has the gavel! | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:36 | 2 |
| It could've been worse if Davis didn't drop that sure TD in the 2nd
quarter.
|
9.1236 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:41 | 17 |
|
> Dallas even
> San Fran 9:5
> KC 3:1
> Buffalo 4:1
Those odds add up to 130% but I get your message on where they rank;
perhaps the odds on the AFC teams should be even longer. We'll
probably be seeing the "real" ones soon enough courtesy of Sheridan or
whomever, and the even on Dallas and the ~2:1 on San Fran are probably
pretty close, giving the NFC over a 80% shot (1:4) on the whole thing.
It does look like the same old story with the NFC but 1:4 odds are just
too unappealing; the AFC teams aren't that strong but then again
they're not the Broncos...
glenn
|
9.1237 | Cheap Shot | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:49 | 23 |
| >> <<< Note 9.1219 by GWEN::ASHE "Thank you Dr. King." >>>
>> Also told me some "rest of the story" stuff on Mr. Alm. He and the guy
>> (according to Doc's sources in Houston) were REAL close and at the time
>> of the accident were a) drunk and b) finding some intimate ways of
>> distracting Alm while he was driving which led to the car going out of
>> control. Knowing what happened to his buddy and what the traces of
>> either fluids or worse were on him... Mr. Alm didn't want to deal with
>> the NFL and the good ol' boy attitude in Houston, Mr. Alm didn't want
>> to deal with the scandals and ended it. This is all alleged and came
>> from Doc's friends in Houston.
I've read this reply two or three times and debated whether or not to
reply. Discretion lost.
This is cheap. Maybe it's true, and maybe it's not, but at this point
it's nothing more than an allegation that besmirches the characters
of two men who are way beyond defending themselves. If you're going
to post something like this, at least report facts, and not just
suspicions.
Jerry
|
9.1238 | | GWEN::ASHE | Thank you Dr. King. | Mon Jan 17 1994 11:57 | 3 |
| Facts are that he was drunk. I can't say anything about the others.
I've only said they were rumors and not fact.
|
9.1239 | You didn't see excuses coming from Pats' fans | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 17 1994 12:04 | 5 |
| �Gee, if that's the case then those Patsies with the lousy uniforms and dump
�of a stadium must've had some awfully tough exams and lots of freak
�injuries this year.
You forgot that stubborn, "my way or the highway" coach.
|
9.1240 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 17 1994 12:09 | 15 |
| �This is cheap. Maybe it's true, and maybe it's not, but at this point
�it's nothing more than an allegation that besmirches the characters
�of two men who are way beyond defending themselves. If you're going
�to post something like this, at least report facts, and not just
�suspicions.
Yesterday a guy from Canada with some pretty impressive credentials
(color commentator for T&F broadcasts, member of one of the governing
bodies in Canadian sports, etc.) gave a presentation on trends in
sports. He said gone are the days when sporting accomplishments are
cheered for what they are. They must first be scrutinized from every
angle to persuade everyone they are legit. After the Ben Johnson mess,
he knows of what he speaks. As 'Saw is so fond of saying, Sports is
but a microcosm of life. You know speculation would be running wild
over the facts behind that tragedy.
|
9.1241 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Mon Jan 17 1994 12:15 | 5 |
| >...allegation that besmirches the characters of two men...
What part of their *character* is besmirched?
brews
|
9.1242 | not what, but how | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Mon Jan 17 1994 13:00 | 13 |
| >> <<< Note 9.1241 by LAGUNA::MAY_BR "JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort" >>>
>> >...allegation that besmirches the characters of two men...
>>What part of their *character* is besmirched?
I knew that someone was going to ask this.
In my opinion, the allegation itself was not so damaging, but the
way in which it was stated. Go back and re-read the original post
and see if you don't agree.
Jerry
|
9.1243 | | GWEN::ASHE | Thank you Dr. King. | Mon Jan 17 1994 13:05 | 3 |
| I don't have a problem with it. Actually, what I heard was worse but
didn't think should be put in here. (hint: something along the lines
of Bruce's pname). If this is what happened, fine. If not, fine.
|
9.1244 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Mon Jan 17 1994 14:02 | 16 |
| Back to football:
I got to see some of the SF/NY, Dallas/GB and KC/Houston games, and all of them
were prime examples of how football games are decided in the trenches.
San Fran's line was blowing holes in the Giants' defenseive front that allowed
Rickey Watters to have a great game.
Green Bay decided to rely upon Reggie White for a pass rush, and rushed only
three people on most pass plays. The Cowboys were able to contain White, thus
were succesful on offense.
Houston was pushing KC around early in the game, but KC adjusted their play
slection and blocking schemes, and outsmarted the Houston defensive game plan.
=Bob=
|
9.1245 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 17 1994 14:24 | 13 |
| >San Fran's line was blowing holes in the Giants' defenseive front that allowed
>Rickey Watters to have a great game.
I think that the DL of the Giants needs shoring up -- either that, or the
guys who are playing there need to get a bit better.
One of the Giants strengths this year was getting Brooks and Bailey freed
up to do their thing. The line couldn't keep the OL of SF from tying
up Brooks and Bailey, thus all the problems... (You noticed that Mark Collins
was making a lot of tackles -- that's badness 8^))
'Saw
|
9.1246 | Dave Barry's "Football Fever" | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 17 1994 16:17 | 94 |
| Date: Sat, 15 Jan 94 16:08:02 EST
From: [email protected] (Dave Barry)
Subject: Football Fever
It is the time of year when we put the holiday season
behind us; a time when we suck in our stomachs, leave the cozy
confines of our homes, go back out into the working world,
purchase some beer, return to our homes, lie down in front of our
TVs and let our stomachs protrude back out.
It's time for the pro football playoffs.
I love to watch football on TV, and I will tell you
exactly why: I have no idea. Perhaps the appeal of this violent
game stems from some basic biological urge that guys have, dating
back millions of years to when primitive spear-carrying men would
go into the forest to hunt game for their families, and their very
survival depended on their ability to operate a remote control.
Whatever the attraction is, a lot of women seem to be
immune to it. I have seen women walk right past a TV set with a
football game on -- and this always amazes me -- not stop to
watch, even if the TV is showing replays of what we call a "good
hit," which is a tackle that causes at least one major internal
organ to actually fly out of a player's body. The average guy
cannot ignore something of this importance. He is going to stop
and watch, even if he's supposed to be doing something else, such
as reporting that his house is on fire. The average guy might not
be able to name the secretary of state, but he can tell you who
made the hit that turned Joe Theisman into a human Gumby -- an
injury so horrible to watch that the TV people basically canceled
the rest of the season so they could show close-up replays of it
in slow motion.
(Just for the record: The player who made this hit is
Lawrence Taylor. The secretary of state is a dweeb.)
Every Thanksgiving, my family attends a gathering at the
home of our friends Gene Weingarten and Arlene Reidy. The women
all gather in one room and talk about careers, relationships,
world events, etc., while the guys, most of whom see each other
only once a year, all gather in front of the TV and stare,
cowlike, at the football game. We even watch the pickup-truck
commercials, despite the fact that most of us are journalists who
rarely haul any payload larger than, say, a bagel. We do not talk,
except to analyze the fine points of the game.
FIRST GUY: Whoa! Look at that! What IS that?
SECOND GUY: I think that's his spleen.
THIRD GUY: No, a spleen that travels that far is going to
rupture. That has to be a kidney.
I don't want you to think that all we guys do at this
gathering is watch football. We also PLAY football, in the back
yard. It's a demanding game. For one thing, each player has
recently consumed his weight in onion dip. For another thing, the
Weingarten-Reidy yard is not a regulation football field: It is a
small hillside covered with thousands of regulation dog doots,
provided courtesy of two large, high-output, retriever-style dogs,
Harry Truman and Clementine, who add to the complexity of the game
by racing around in frantic circles at high speeds, like subatomic
particles in the Superconducting Super Collider, but not as
intelligent.
We play Standard Back-Yard Touch Football Rules, which
require that, on each down, the offensive players must spend a
minimum of five minutes in the huddle, devising a pass play more
complex than the Clinton health plan, calling for curls, hooks,
slants, feints, cutbacks, laterals, running all the way around the
house, diving into the hammock, giving the ball to a small child
and instructing the child to cry if an opposing player comes near,
etc. Once we designed a play that involved spitting on the
defensive backs.
When the ball is snapped, everybody forgets about the play
and concentrates on (a) not falling down, and (b) avoiding the
pass rush, which is a threat to players on both sides inasmuch as
it is provided by Harry Truman, a relentless competitor who will
definitely bite your leg.
The main difference between our games and pro football is
that sometimes we score a touchdown. This virtually never happens
in the NFL. The referees won't allow it. They're jealous of the
players, because the players get to wear sleek athletic uniforms,
whereas the referees have to wear dorky little hats and pants that
make them appear to have enormous butts. They look like they're
smuggling mattresses back there. So if a player scores a
touchdown, the referees immediately call it back and make a
complex announcement over the loudspeakers ("OK, WE HAVE HOLDING
ON NUMBER 84, WHICH IS OFFSET BY AN ILLEGAL PARAMETER ON NUMBER
73, WHICH IS FURTHER COMPOUNDED BY A FAILURE TO DECLARE NON-
ACCRUABLE DIVIDEND INCOME ON THE PART OF NUMBER 143, ALTHOUGH THIS
IS SOMEWHAT MITIGATED BY ...").
My suggestions for making the NFL more exciting are:
1. Allow the refs to wear cool uniforms and participate in
end-zone dances, or
2. Allow the players to tackle the referees. ("OK, WE
HAVE -- WHAM.")
Speaking on behalf of a lot of guys, I urge the owners to
consider these sensible changes. Also, while they're up, they
should get me a beer.
(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
9.1247 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Mon Jan 17 1994 16:59 | 21 |
|
I was very suprised with the defensive line play of KC. They couldn't get any
pressure on O'Donnell the previous week and I expected more of the same this
week.
As far as Dallas - GB. I guess that franchise QB Aikman should go hide his head
after only piling up huge offensive numbers and leading his team to victory on
a day when the running game was non-existant for the first 3/4th of the
contest.
I'm sure any podunk QB could have done the same thing...
I think Dallas will do the same thing to San Fran they did last year. Eat them
up with a balanced offensive game plan. It's easy to stop a 1 dimensional
team (giants) It's tougher to stop a multi talented team....San Fran doesn't
have the D-backs to cover Irvin/Harper and stop the run....Their only chance is
to outscore the CowBoys...
Unfortunately I think we'll have a rematch of last year...At least we only have
1 week of hype in between..
Metz
|
9.1248 | incredible pressure... | SALEM::STIG | | Tue Jan 18 1994 09:27 | 4 |
| the reason that KC had so much pressure was the stunts and blitzes that
they were using...
stig
|
9.1250 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Tue Jan 18 1994 11:08 | 4 |
| >> I'm sure any podunk QB could have done the same thing...
There is 24 of em sitting at home crying in their pretzels wishing
they had the chance
|
9.1251 | C'mon, the guy can play... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 18 1994 11:35 | 9 |
|
I didn't think Aikman was that spectacular last Sunday, but it seems
like once a week now I pick up the paper and some rival GM is claiming
that he's the best QB in the NFC, his team support notwithstanding
(doubtless the best). At the very least he's got a lot of experts
snookered...
glenn
|
9.1252 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Jan 18 1994 11:46 | 9 |
| > I didn't think Aikman was that spectacular last Sunday, but it seems
> like once a week now I pick up the paper and some rival GM is claiming
> that he's the best QB in the NFC, his team support notwithstanding
> (doubtless the best). At the very least he's got a lot of experts
> snookered...
Hey, I guess somedays, when the rest of your team is clicking, all you
have to be is solid....8^)
|
9.1253 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 18 1994 12:21 | 4 |
| �Hey, I guess somedays, when the rest of your team is clicking, all you
�have to be is solid....8^)
See Phil Simms...
|
9.1254 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Jan 18 1994 12:26 | 12 |
| >
> See Phil Simms...
>
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
There's also been a lot of games where Simms carried the team. And when
it comes to leadership on the field, I'll take Simms any day.
|
9.1255 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Tue Jan 18 1994 12:31 | 10 |
| There's a simple reason why most experts consider Aikman to be the best
in the game. I mean, look at the mans stats. He finished second in
the entire NFL in QB ratings (Young 101.5 - Aikman 99). He led the
league with a greater than 68% completion mark.
Aikman is uncanny with his accuracy. Don't forget also that he has one
of the strongest arms in the league. Just my opinions of course; all
standard disclaimers apply!
- Rope
|
9.1256 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 18 1994 12:31 | 4 |
| �There's also been a lot of games where Simms carried the team. And when
�it comes to leadership on the field, I'll take Simms any day.
I wouldn't expect any less from such a die hard Giants fan.
|
9.1257 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Jan 18 1994 13:22 | 8 |
| >
> I wouldn't expect any less from such a die hard Giants fan.
>
Oh, I get it. When I'm right, it's attributed to me being a die-hard
Giants fan.....
'Saw
|
9.1258 | Subpar Aikmen Performance | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | God can be so appreciated! | Tue Jan 18 1994 13:26 | 9 |
| It would have to be considered a subpar Aikmen day. He threw
6 int's all year, threw two last Sunday, and had one pass go
right through Holland's hands which could have been a third
int. He sure is accurate though.
Wish the Pack had lost that game a few years ago and drafted
Aikmen instead of Mandarich. Oh well...
Tony
|
9.1259 | You want facts? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Tue Jan 18 1994 13:46 | 12 |
| >> <<< Note 9.1249 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>> close. Aikman notched 284 yards and threw 2 INTs. Not really *HUGE*
The stats I saw were 27-38 for 302 yards, 3 TDs and 2 picks. If that's
not *HUGE*, I guess it'll just have to do. I also recall him getting
sacked at least twice.
>> But don't let facts get in your way, Metz.
Jerry
|
9.1261 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 18 1994 15:59 | 4 |
| �Oh, I get it. When I'm right, it's attributed to me being a die-hard
�Giants fan.....
Who said you were right?
|
9.1262 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Tue Jan 18 1994 16:18 | 1 |
| :-)
|
9.1263 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:09 | 22 |
| I did.
I've watched Simms since 1979, I've watched him develop from a rookie to
where he is today.
He's not Joe Montana, he has his moments when he's brilliant and he has
moments (the 1989 playoffs against the Rams comes to mind) when he's
atrocious.
He has everything I'd want in a QB -- he's a ferocious competitor and
he's a leader on the field. He passes well, he runs the offense well,
and he is, along with LT, responsible for pulling the Giants out of
the quagmire of the 1970s into one of the perennial contenders of
the 80's and now 90s.
With the exception of Bledsoe, who's unproven, I'd match Simms stat for
stat, and intangible against intangible, for any of the so called
'quarterbacks' the Patriots have had since 1979.
'Saw
|
9.1264 | Simms has my respect | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:14 | 6 |
| 'Saw, as a Cowboys fan I ALWAYS feared Phil Simms. Simms may not have
been spectacular looking, but he could pick a defense to pieces. He
had a couple of real good games against Dallas. It'd be nice to see
his career stats against the Cowboys.
- Rope
|
9.1265 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:15 | 9 |
| > With the exception of Bledsoe, who's unproven, I'd match Simms stat for
> stat, and intangible against intangible, for any of the so called
>'quarterbacks' the Patriots have had since 1979.
So you would prove that Sims was better than bad or mediocre QBs. Not exactly
proof of his greatness.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1266 | Thank you | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:20 | 32 |
| >> <<< Note 9.1260 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
-< ex >-
>> Yes, facts and not your vague memory.
>> Dal -- Harper 25 pass from Aikman (Murray kick), 5:53
That's 1
>> Dal -- Novacek 6 pass from Aikman (Murray kick), 14:55
That's 2
>> Dal -- Irvin 19 pass from Aikman (Murray kick), 9:05
That's 3
>> GB Dal
>>Net Yards Passing 327 284
>> PASSING--Green Bay-Brett Favre 28-45-2- 331. Dallas-Troy Aikman
>>28-37-2-302.
All things considered, I'll take my "vague memory" over your "facts".
Your reply verifies what I said, which is that Aikman went 28-37-2
(actually, I may have said 27-38-2, so sue me) for 302 yards and 3 TDs.
The 284 Net Yards Passing reflects losses due to sacks, or didn't anybody
ever explain that to you?
Jerry
|
9.1267 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:21 | 8 |
| �With the exception of Bledsoe, who's unproven, I'd match Simms stat for
�stat, and intangible against intangible, for any of the so called
�'quarterbacks' the Patriots have had since 1979.
First the excellent loss/burnt out stuff now a statement reminiscent of
Eric Montross will be the next Joe Kleine. I think I've unearthed the
longest college prank in SPROTS history folks -- Frank Way is actually
ACChris.
|
9.1268 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:22 | 4 |
| Yeah, well give Favre those receivers and I'm not sure he wouldn;t
do as well.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1269 | Eric will be the next Joe Wolf | FRETZ::HEISER | Matthew 5:18 | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:23 | 1 |
| Hey, Joe Kleine has a decent shot at a ring this year, does Eric?
|
9.1270 | QB is the most important position on the field.... | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Tue Jan 18 1994 18:08 | 14 |
|
Favre has an equal (if not better) reciever to Irvin in Sharpe and Brooks is an
adequate reciever but less than Harper...try again...
I don't need the stats to tell me that Aikman led the team to victory over the
Packers. I watched the game and it was pretty evident. Emmit was non-existant
(due to injury) and Aikman led the team to a comfortable lead and then the
coaches decided to sit on it....It's not that tough to see why the cowboys are
defending champs and the teams that sign the Wade Wilsons, Boomer Esiasons and
Jim Harbaughs of the world sit and watch from their living rooms....
Young, Aikman, Kelly and Montana in the final four...coincidence? I think not..
Metz
|
9.1271 | So & so's better than....blah blah | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Wed Jan 19 1994 01:21 | 20 |
| QB's are only as good as the following:
1) Offensive line
2) Coaching/franchise
3) Skill
4) Receiver corps
In that order.
For those of you who watch the Bills or the Niners - how often have you
seen Bono (OK he comes on when it's all over usually) come on and be
inept. How 'bout Reich ?? He consistently comes on for Kelly when his
glass body can't take a couple of sacks or he goes in the huff & he
seems to me to do an excelent job. His stats are as good as Kelly's.
My justification for the list.
What do I know, I played soccer @ school :-)
Davie.
|
9.1273 | stats sucks | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Wed Jan 19 1994 10:04 | 8 |
| Nowhere is it written that a good/great QB has to put up good/huge
numbers to earn the G rating. And on the flip side, putting up the
numbers don't necessarily make the grade, either.
There are a couple of attributes that the great QB share. These include
doing what they have to do to win and winning big games.
TTom
|
9.1274 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 10:32 | 4 |
| Look at Bob Griese's stats for the 1972 and 1973 seasons. I think he averaged
about 20 throws a game.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1276 | relative talent | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Wed Jan 19 1994 11:20 | 10 |
| San Francisco didn't have the talent that the 70 Steelers did. Just look
at the Hall of Fame and about every other starter for Pittsburgh has made
it.
So I guess this means that Joe Montana > Terry Bradshaw?
And yes, Earl completed the regular season for Griese and started the
first playoff game in 72.
TTom
|
9.1278 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 19 1994 11:43 | 14 |
|
What's being proved again by all these examples over the years is that
there's no such thing as a "franchise player" in football, if your
definition is one of a player who can lead a team to great success by
himself or with minimal help. It's just not possible in a game with 22
starting players. It doesn't matter in what order the great players
come to the team (Bradshaw was one of the first in Pittsburgh), it
doesn't matter if you build defense first and then go for offense or
vice versa, it only matters where you eventually end up. You're not
going to find any significant common element to the great teams other
than the obvious fact that they all had great players...
glenn
|
9.1279 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready,Steady,Go! | Wed Jan 19 1994 11:51 | 8 |
| �With the exception of Bledsoe, who's unproven, I'd match Simms stat for
�stat, and intangible against intangible, for any of the so called
�'quarterbacks' the Patriots have had since 1979.
Hardly what one could call a ringing endorsement for Simms. You
could probably say the same thing for Jim "Happy Feet" Everett.
/Don
|
9.1280 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:10 | 3 |
| �So I guess this means that Joe Montana > Terry Bradshaw?
And look at KC with and without Montana.
|
9.1281 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:14 | 5 |
| But look at KC with Montana, but without Marcus Allen and/or Derrick Thomas.
Montana pushes 'em over the edge, but he could not carry the team in
his own.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1282 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:20 | 13 |
| > Bill Walsh will be in the Hall. Ronnie Lott will be in the Hall.
>Bubba Paris probably deserves to be
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Nice of you to try to help the people of California in this time of
misery with a good joke, Tommy. Bubba PAris?? The guy was vilified and
singularly responsible for many of Montana's injuries. If you wanted
another OL. try Jessie Sapolo[sp], and possibly HArris Barton, but not
Blubber Paris. Eric Wright was as good a CB as there was for a few
years until his hammies went on him. And while I like Taylor, I don't
think we'll see JT in the Hall.
brews
|
9.1283 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:21 | 29 |
| | <<< Note 9.1279 by VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD "Ready,Steady,Go!" >>>
|
|�With the exception of Bledsoe, who's unproven, I'd match Simms stat for
|�stat, and intangible against intangible, for any of the so called
|�'quarterbacks' the Patriots have had since 1979.
|
| Hardly what one could call a ringing endorsement for Simms. You
|could probably say the same thing for Jim "Happy Feet" Everett.
|
| /Don
Yeah, no shit. I don't need a "ringing endorsement for Simms". I've watched
him since 1979 and seen what he could do.
As to TCM, who said anything about proving greatness? I was just saying that
compared to what the Patriots have had, he's head and shoulders above them.
If one wanted to extend the argument a bit, one could say what the hell would
a Patriots fan know about a good QB, since they haven't had a decent one in so
long, and the most interesting thing to watch during their games is the
Patriettes....
Simms has got two rings. In the second Super Bowl season he took them through
much of their 10-0 run before being injured. Hoss came in and took them
the rest of the way. What more could a Giants fan ask for?
'Saw
|
9.1285 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready,Steady,Go! | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:33 | 19 |
| �If one wanted to extend the argument a bit, one could say what the hell would
�a Patriots fan know about a good QB, since they haven't had a decent one in so
�long, and the most interesting thing to watch during their games is the
�Patriettes....
Utterly ridiculous. That's like saying that when you were a
GoWhale fan you wouldn't be able to know how a great hockey player should
play 'cuz you never saw one.
�Simms has got two rings. In the second Super Bowl season he took them through
�much of their 10-0 run before being injured. Hoss came in and took them
�the rest of the way. What more could a Giants fan ask for?
Simms was the quarterback when the Giants lost to the 49ers on a
Monday night game during the regular season. Hoss was the quarterback when
the Giants won the NFC Championship game that same season against the 49ers.
/Don
|
9.1286 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:47 | 3 |
| Wasn't Simms injured during the 49'ers game then Hoss took over?
The Crazy Met
|
9.1287 | Dennis Hopper commercials are in trouble ? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Sales gets commisions we get "JACK" | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:09 | 6 |
| I read in the paper that a group claims that Dennis Hopper's Nike commercials
are making parody of the mentally ill people of the world and has asked Nike to
voluntarily remove them from the air.
Does anybody think we live in a free country anymore.
|
9.1288 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:25 | 9 |
|
Tommy,
First you say that Aikman isn't the franchise player for the Cowboys, Emmitt
is. Then you state that their is no such thing as a franchise player.
Which is it bud?
Metz
|
9.1290 | Metz, 'ya gotta work on name recognition | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 14:45 | 6 |
| .1278 said there was no such thing as a franchise player in football. that was
glenn not tommy.
HtH
The Crazy Met
|
9.1291 | I've got verbal scoots. | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:12 | 23 |
| I can't fail to notice a constant belittling of the Patriots in here.
Take the 'discussion' about Pat QB's. Surely this goes to enforce what
I was trying to put across in my earlier post. Doesn't matter how good
your QB is whether you're rebuilding or not. You need to have a HC like
Bill P who has balls & winning experience (to a degree :-). But even
before all that you need a well structured franchise & an owner who
will back the team to the HILT. Not soft stroke them around and try
to 'do your best with the money/resources available.
Orthwein (sp) is
like many others in the League. The teams with owners like these will
NEVER make it big time. Over here we see the same in soccer. All the
teams who seem to be on a lower level than the others still bring
through classy players but they never stay that way because the owner
doesn't fully back the squad & you end up asking him to do more than
he has natural talent to cope with. Result - complete cack Pat QB.
Dallas made it work but we all know how that was achieved. Painful at
the time but an absolute must. JJ would be dung if it wasn't for his
rich busom bud in the big chair.
Franchise is king.
Davie.
|
9.1293 | Skunk squad | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:47 | 9 |
| I guessed some of you fans were doing it. I suppose if my team couldn't
kick sh*t off a one legged dog's ass i'd be a wee bit peeved as well.
I like what meat Parcel has done at the Pats. They look as though they
mean business in the nest coupla years - all depends on the club sale
though.
I just wish they hadn't shafted my beloved fish on the last game
of the season. Who the hell is Ben Coates apart from TE of the year ??
Davie.
|
9.1294 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:52 | 14 |
| Just to get away with the franchise player talk..
What player on the team deserves the most money?
I say it's the QB. he's the cornerstone of the whole team (I'm talking about
players not fat dudes that stand around yelling all day), he makes the on field
decisions and his skill set is more valuable than anybody else out there. I
don;t think you win the big one without a very-good to excellent QB. There are
a lot of mediocre QB's playing in the NFL and I think that the drop off in the
level of team play gets effected more by the QB than any other position, The Qb
can't win the game and the super bowl by himself but I can't think of an
example of a team winning the whole enchilada with even a mediocre Qb.
Metz
|
9.1295 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready,Steady,Go! | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:53 | 10 |
| �Wasn't Simms injured during the 49'ers game then Hoss took over?
�The Crazy Met
No. Simms was injured against the Bills in a regular season game
on a Saturday afternoon late in the season. Hoss took over and the rest is
history. Simms may have been able to play in the Super Bowl but Parcells
wanted to win the game.
/Don
|
9.1296 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:58 | 7 |
| Metz, do you mean over a career or over a season?
Rypien was not exactly a great QB; he had a phenomenal year.
Dallas in 1971? Who was the QB, Morton?
The Crazy Met
|
9.1297 | Here's mud | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:00 | 9 |
| He's got the highest profile & the most pressure. I agree to an extent
to what you say but also think they are far to overrated. A QB usually
gets taught the schemes & runs of the club. Whether or not he calls
them on his own still doesn't get away from the fact that the coaches
are crucial.
I just want an argument anyway :-)
Davie.
|
9.1298 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:04 | 9 |
|
even if he's calling a play sent in by the coach he has to make the read on
the safeties, figure out what route the WR's are running (most routes are site
reads these days based on the coverage)...that's the mental part..then he has
to deliver the baall to the right spot at the right time over the linemen and
usually gets cracked 2 times out of 3 on passing downs while fully exposed
with his hand over his head... (that's the physical part)
Metz
|
9.1299 | Captain America | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:09 | 15 |
| >> <<< Note 9.1296 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>
>>Metz, do you mean over a career or over a season?
>>Rypien was not exactly a great QB; he had a phenomenal year.
>>Dallas in 1971? Who was the QB, Morton?
>>The Crazy Met
The only Super Bowl Morton ever won for Dallas was 1977 - Dallas vs.
Denver! QB in 1971 was the incomparable Roger Staubach.
- Rope
|
9.1300 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:10 | 3 |
| Ok, wasn't sure when Staubach joined the Cowboys.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1301 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready,Steady,Go! | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:12 | 6 |
| No, I believe Morton was the quarterback for the '71 Dallas team
that lost to Baltimore. Staubach was the quarterback in '72 and '77,
but Morton was the quarterback for the '77 Donkey team. Give me Joe
Montana anyday. Heck he's even making Schottenheimer look good.
/Don
|
9.1302 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:19 | 4 |
| /er I was talking about the 1971 season. Dallas beat Miami after the 1971
season, that was the 1972 SB.
Morton
|
9.1304 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:37 | 4 |
| I say a QB can be a franchise player. Look at Elway over the past
years. He did most everything to get them there.
Tim
|
9.1305 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:39 | 5 |
| re: .1304
yabbut we're talking about winning the whole enchilada.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1306 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:42 | 9 |
|
>> yabbut we're talking about winning the whole enchilada.
Elway doesn't like Mexican food.
|
9.1307 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:44 | 16 |
|
Taylor would have commanded more than Simms or Hoss on the open market because
a team that already had a good starting QB would have eagerly gone after a
great LB. However would a team like Tampa Bay be better off signing LT or Joe
Montana if both were available as free agents?
If you were starting a football team from scratch and could pick any player
where would you start?
I agree with your Giant example of the best player on the team not always the
QB. However I'd say that 75% of the time it is the QB that's the best player on
the team and in the cases that it's not it because the QB isn't good or the
team has a "best player on the planet" at another position.
Metz
|
9.1308 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:52 | 9 |
| You don't have to win a SB to be a frachise player.
Marino is another case.
Rypein isn't even close to a franchise player, but he did win
a SB. He isn't much (except a whiner) without that good OL. Case in
point the last 2 years.
Tim
|
9.1309 | 2 to chew | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Wed Jan 19 1994 17:29 | 5 |
| A couple of other 'dimming lights':
Doug (who ?) Williams
Boomer Esiason
Davie.
|
9.1310 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 19 1994 17:52 | 35 |
|
> The most valuable player on the team. Contentiousness aside, I agree
> with you, Metz that the QB position does require the most mental agility
> but I still think that your QB needn't be your best player and often isn't.
> Case in point: Lawrence Taylor in his prime. LT was, imo, the best player
> in football nevermind just on the Giants, the very definition of a "fran-
> chise player". We know what he did to offenses and you don't win those
> two SBs without him. No way you should pay Hostedler or Simms more than
> you pay Taylor just because they play QB. If they would have had free
> agency much earlier in their career's who would have commanded more?
A couple of nights ago while sitting in another snowstorm-induced
traffic jam I heard a very similar discussion come up on WFAN, where
Franscesa and Russo were asked to reflect on LT's career. One caller
asked which they'd take if they had the choice between LT's or Joe
Montana's career and both without hesitation reponded "Montana; he's a
QB" (I was kind of surprised; these guys are Giants' fans and both have
followed LT's career very closely). Granted, this is not any kind of
definitive answer to the specific question and I'm not sure I even
agree with it, but I do think that the fact that it is a tough choice
points out that it's kind of silly to say that a player like LT can
be the definition of a "franchise player" but a QB like Montana can't.
Any argument in favor of one can be used for the other.
In the case of Montana specifically, Tommy, I'm kind of confused how
you can say that you like Kansas City to go to the Super Bowl in
large part due to the "Montana Factor" at the same time that you
concede that he's no longer much more than an average QB. If that's
not the kind of respect normally associated with this nebulous concept
of a "franchise player", I don't know what is. It doesn't sound like
the kind of thing that would be said about Steve Bono (or even Steve
Young, both of whom haven't won a thing, system or no system).
glenn
|
9.1311 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Jan 20 1994 08:38 | 20 |
| > How do you match "intangible for intangible"? Aren't intangibles by
> definition immeasurable?
Technically yes, but I remember in the pick 'em segments on CBS a few
years back they used to compare "intangibles" and that'w what I was
thinking of.
> Obviously, you didn't watch any Pats games this year and are just taking an
> unnecessary swipe at all Pats fans. It ain't our fault that film Simms was
> a mediocre QB that happened to be in the right place at the right time.
Tommy, I know you're sharper than that. If you read back a few notes,
you'll know that I disqualified this season since Bledsoe is a rookie
and didn't have a chance to really prove himself.
'Saw
|
9.1312 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Jan 20 1994 08:39 | 12 |
| > Simms was the quarterback when the Giants lost to the 49ers on a
>Monday night game during the regular season. Hoss was the quarterback when
>the Giants won the NFC Championship game that same season against the 49ers.
Yeah, so?
Eason was the quarterback when that Pats beat the Dolphins to go to the
Super Bowl, Eason was the quarterback in that marvelous Patriots effort
against the Bears.
What's it prove?
|
9.1313 | eason,flutie and grogs... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Thu Jan 20 1994 08:59 | 3 |
| and flutie was doing his thang two...
stiggy
|
9.1315 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 20 1994 09:53 | 7 |
| �Eason was the quarterback when that Pats beat the Dolphins to go to the
�Super Bowl, Eason was the quarterback in that marvelous Patriots effort
�against the Bears.
Eason wasn't as bad as most people think he was.
Jim Plunkett, 2 (?) SB rings, lousy Patriot QB?
|
9.1316 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 20 1994 10:02 | 4 |
| But look what it took to get Plunkett those SB rings; Marcus Allen, raiders
WR and TE; defense.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1317 | Skills plus leadership... what more is there? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 20 1994 10:17 | 34 |
|
> His skills have definitely eroded but he's
> got a team behind him now that has complete confidence in him and thinks
> that they'll never be out of a game. I think Saw would call that an in-
> tangible. Is that any clearer?
How does any of this differ from what can be said about *any* player
who attains the reputation of "franchise player" (over the course of
career; obviously Montana has slipped some)? Being the team leader in
addition to one of its best players is what it's all about, and that
quality can come from anywhere, QB certainly not excluded. I didn't
say you said that Montana was the whole team, I said you claimed that
he is a *large part* of why they'll be AFC champs. And that's exactly
what you said.
>> It doesn't sound like the kind of thing that would be said about Steve
>> Bono (or even Steve Young, both of whom haven't won a thing, system or
>> no system).
> If there's any one difference between these Niners and the championship
> era Niners, it's the defense, especially the run defense. The offense
> hasn't slipped at all.
As I recall, the 49ers won a championship as an NFC Championship Game
and Super Bowl underdog, with a team that was much more offense than
defense at the time, with Dwight Clark and Freddie Solomon as receivers,
and with Earl Cooper as the primary rushing threat. I mean, the guy
has spanned the eras, done it all, and he may do so again (I don't
think he will even get to the Super Bowl; the odds are too great, but
that's besides the point). All that but still not a "franchise player"
(if you accept that there is such a thing)? Really?
glenn
|
9.1318 | More crow potential... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 21 1994 10:21 | 14 |
|
Feeling the urge to go out on a limb on at least one of these games
this weekend, I like San Fran to upset Dallas (and at the very least
cover). San Fran's defense has taken some raps but they really have
not given up a lot of points at all this year, especially considering
the wide-open game they play on offense that leaves the opponents with
more possessions than a ball-control team like the Giants (or even the
Cowboys). Their offense is still the best. I'd be very wary of going
against Dallas at home but I just can't get past this Emmitt Smith
injury thing. If he can't play at at least 90% I don't think they have
enough. So make it San Fran-Buffalo for next weekend...
glenn
|
9.1319 | JMHO | AD::HEATH | Have pitchers and catchers reported yet? | Fri Jan 21 1994 10:32 | 9 |
|
Glen...
I don't think that you've gone to far out on a limb in picking the '9ers to
beat Dallas. In fact I don't think you've left the trunk. I think the
49'ers will beat Dallas outright.
Jerry
|
9.1320 | one more | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:07 | 5 |
| Just like certain parts o' the anatomy...
It looks like KC and Dallas to me.
TTom
|
9.1321 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready,Steady,Go! | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:18 | 4 |
| I like (not really) Dallas giving the points and Kansas City
getting the points.
/Don
|
9.1322 | Johnson does Namath | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:19 | 17 |
| From: [email protected] (UPI)
Newsgroups:
clari.sports.football,clari.local.texas,clari.local.california
Subject: No question about it -- Dallas will win, insists Johnson
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 94 20:41:16 PST
DALLAS (UPI) -- A confident and candid Jimmy Johnson told a Dallas
radio station Thursday that his Dallas Cowboys would definitely beat the
San Francisco 49ers Sunday in the National Football Conference
championship game in Irving, Texas.
``We are going to beat their rear ends,'' said Johnson, now in his
fifth year as the Cowboys head coach. ``We will win. And you can print
that in three-inch headlines.''
The defending Super Bowl champion Cowboys are 3 1-2-point favorites
over San Francisco. The game will be a rematch of last year's NFC
championship game, in which Dallas held off the 49ers, 30-20, at Candle
Stick Park in San Francisco.
|
9.1323 | what an idjit | FRETZ::HEISER | Matthew 5:18 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:21 | 1 |
|
|
9.1324 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:23 | 6 |
| One more reason to hope the 49ers kick Dallas' butt on Sunday.
49ers and Bills to win. Both in close (< TD margin) games.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1325 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:40 | 2 |
| It's about time someone spoke his mind rather than do the "any given
Sunday, they've got a good team, we're just glad to be here" BS.
|
9.1326 | how many Namath's are there? | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:44 | 14 |
| Fine, now his team better back it up.
Some stupid statements from the past:
Denver braggin about the Orang Crush defense and then getting crushed
by Dallas.
David Cone and that stupid column he ghosted for the Daily News(?) at
the start of the 1988 playoffs.
There are others.
More often than not those statements come back to haunt you.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1327 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:48 | 7 |
| re: .1325
Gee, Mac, what would you have said if Buddy Ryan had said that? Nice
double standard there.
Dennis Faust
|
9.1328 | Cowboys Rule Sunday! | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:48 | 18 |
| <<< Note 9.1325 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
>> It's about time someone spoke his mind rather than do the "any given
>> Sunday, they've got a good team, we're just glad to be here" BS.
Amen to that Mac! Johnson's an excellent motivator. Obviously he
knows just what buttons to push. Dallas has the best team in the
league. Unfortunately injuries have taken their toil the last few
weeks. What many don't realize is the HUGE problem caused by All-Pro
center Mark Stepnoski being out. I look for San Fran to try to exploit
Gesek in the middle.
I'm still picking the 'Boys injuries and all. If you thought the NY
Giant performance by Emmitt was something, you ain't seen nothing yet!
- Rope
|
9.1329 | 49ers, chiefs for Atlanta | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:49 | 10 |
| I will take 49ers and KC.
I think KC can beat Bills in temp's of 25 degrees but not in conditions
like last week.
Dallas is not team they were last year but I would not be going against
them counting on Emmitt "not to show up".
And one way or t'other I don't want to see bills-'boys again though I
doubt even that would be a runaway.
|
9.1330 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:49 | 4 |
| � Gee, Mac, what would you have said if Buddy Ryan had said that? Nice
� double standard there.
You obviously have me confused with someone else. I like Buddy.
|
9.1331 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:58 | 4 |
| Dennis in all fairness, Mac is right on the money in .1330
The Crazy Met
|
9.1332 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:04 | 5 |
| If he didn't think his team could do it he wouldn't be saying it.
If this doesn't motivate the niners even more than they are now then
nothing will. Johnson wants the niners to be at their best so that if
Dallas does indeed win he can say he beat the best.
|
9.1333 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:21 | 10 |
| > If this doesn't motivate the niners even more than they are now then
> nothing will
If the niners weren't already motivated, nothing anyone says can make
much of a difference.
One good thing about the injuries to Maryland and Smith is that if the
niners do win, I can say that the Giants helped put the Cowboys out.
brews
|
9.1334 | could make it tuff... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:27 | 8 |
| re .1328. Dallas might have the best team in the league but they
aren't unbeatable. The old saying goes, "anyone can beat anyone in any
giving day". The statement from Johnson is only going to fire up the
9ers and it shows them "no respect" as far as Dallas is concerned. They
already are going to have a hard enuff time beating the 9ers as is, why
make it worse.
stig
|
9.1335 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:31 | 10 |
|
Human nature. When you are told you can't do something you try to
prove them wrong. Some people rise to the occasion, while others make
mental mistakes because they are trying to make the big play. Maybe
Johnson has made an assessment based over time about the 49er players
and thinks that such a remark will benifit more than hurt. Before you
go saying it was a good/bad statement to make, let's see what the
results are first.
Marc
|
9.1336 | Just makes it sweeter for the rest of us if Dallas loses... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:33 | 12 |
|
I don't think a statement like Johnson's makes a bit of difference
on the game either way; he just looks like a bigger jerk than he
already is if Dallas loses. If they win, hey, Jimmy was right, but
they've still got another game to play. The statement doesn't reflect
the reality of Dallas' situation (they are far from a guaranteed
rock-solid lock) so it doesn't appear to be a real smart gamble. But
that's JJ. He's been burned by similar statements before, like when he
was at Miami, but obviously doesn't give a damn.
glenn
|
9.1337 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:02 | 10 |
| Meanwhile in Atlanta...
It seems that the head coaching job is down to three candidates:
defensive coordinator June Jones, Joe Gibb, and Boston College coach Tom
Coughlin.
I wonder if now tha tGlanville is gone, they'll get rid of those dumb
black-on-black uniforms.
=Bob=
|
9.1338 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:15 | 6 |
| ..it's Gibbs, =Bob=
He ain't a Bee Gee
;-)
dr.a
and I think Coughlin said no, didn't he?
|
9.1339 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:25 | 10 |
|
�and I think Coughlin said no, didn't he?
I heard this morning that Coughlin had no comment, but that Upchuck, the AD at
BC said he was sure that he would honor his contract.
I doubt he'll take it. He can make more money in college football than the
pros, and if he moves to a big program, he'll be treated as a god.
=Bob=
|
9.1340 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Matthew 5:18 | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:37 | 4 |
| > -< Johnson does Namath >-
now it don't count in a non-championship game, at least that's what they
told me last year when Westphal successfully did it.
|
9.1342 | Feel better now, Tommy? Sheesh... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:52 | 10 |
|
The game is being played in Dallas, and not a neutral field, right?
It's "Dallas and everyone else", right? And I had thought the spread
was 6 points. Whatever. San Fran over Dallas, no upset. In this
place it doesn't matter if you say that you like the 100-to-1 shot to
give it a game until haltime; if you're wrong you'll be raked over the
coals just the same...
glenn
|
9.1343 | chance for a middle, especiall if it fell to 2.5 | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:07 | 6 |
| Glenn,
spread started at 6 and is now 3.5
The Crazy Met
|
9.1344 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:08 | 18 |
| I would like to see a SF vs KC SB just for different teams (plus I
dislike the sowboys and the bills will roll over for a nap), but I
don't think I will be able to keep food down when having to listen to
the Montana vs Young spew. It would be hyped as the SB of all time
blah blah blah...
I like 9'rs over girls and KC (defense) over the stills....
Then again, my team choked so it doesn't matter that much as long as
a good SB is shown, and with 1 week off, that might happen.
I don't know if anyone posted this elsewhere yet, but I heard that
Madden and is drawing board are going to FOX for 4 years at $30
million. Is this baseball or what? Thats alot of $$$$ for a fat man
that needs to wear a bib when commentating (-)
Tim
|
9.1345 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:11 | 39 |
| <<< Note 9.1336 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
>> He's been burned by similar statements before, like when he
>> was at Miami, but obviously doesn't give a damn.
>> glenn
glenn, obviously Johnson hasn't been burned too much or often. He's a
proven winner no matter what level he's coached. I'd imagine there's
an awful lot of pro and college coaches that would take his record in a
second. He is one of the brightest football coaches I've ever seen.
The man doesn't leave anything to chance. Having a degree in
Industrial Physcology, I'd imagine his statement was meant also to fire
up the Cowboys.
Here's a bit of that physcology in action from last season. This was
printed in today's USA TODAY. To put the quote in proper context,
Johnson was talking to the team after the media had been saying they
would struggle with all of the media focus, etc., during the two week
period.
Reprinted W/O Permission
"And I told our players, 'Understand this. If we were playing Buffalo
out here on the practice field with nobody watching, we'd kick the hell
out of them. Now, all of a sudden we're going to go halfway across the
country to another location, and a lot of people are going to be
interviewing you and talking to you, and you're going to let that seed
go into your mind and because of a distraction you're going to play
differently?'
"I said, "We're going to go to Pasadena, we're going to deal with
the media, go through the functions and do our deal. We're going to
practice hard and be prepared. But when the game starts, in our mind,
we're going to be on the practice field. And because we're the best
team, we'll win.' That's the seed that I planted."
The man's a motivator, and does whatever it takes to win. No way, I'd
bet against him or Dallas this weekend.
- Rope
|
9.1346 | But take the over!!!!!!!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Mark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces. | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:14 | 9 |
|
Tommy,
Glen just likes the 9ers cuz they got some red in there uni's.
Chappy
|
9.1347 | Great coach; just don't like him... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:32 | 38 |
|
> glenn, obviously Johnson hasn't been burned too much or often. He's a
> proven winner no matter what level he's coached. I'd imagine there's
> an awful lot of pro and college coaches that would take his record in a
> second. He is one of the brightest football coaches I've ever seen.
> The man doesn't leave anything to chance. Having a degree in
> Industrial Physcology, I'd imagine his statement was meant also to fire
> up the Cowboys.
Ropes, I have no argument with the stuff about JJ's coaching ability.
I'm not buying into the psychobabble, though. For starters, the guy
"motivated" a couple of championship-favorite Miami Hurricane teams into
major upsets in the bowls after the 1985 and 1986 seasons. The 1987
Fiesta Bowl in particular was one of the alltime greatest comeuppances
in college football history, and JJ was right at the forefront in
guaranteeing victory, keeping his team out of serious practice
sessions and claiming that they didn't need the work and play better
that way, etc. Granted, he has gotten tough in the pros, real tough,
but I'm still not so sure that he's that well-connected with his players'
mental states.
On a more serious note, didn't I hear JJ in an interview admitting to
suffering from manic depression or something (I'd have a hard time
believing he could function as an NFL head coach with legitimate
clinical manic depression, though), where he said among other things
he won't be in this business for much longer? I don't think this stuff
is some great psychological calculation; I think it's the real JJ and
that he's something of a kook. That's not why I don't like him, though;
that's where the arrogance comes in.
> The man's a motivator, and does whatever it takes to win. No way, I'd
> bet against him or Dallas this weekend.
I'm hearing that it's really not that big a deal to do so, depending on
the day of the week, that is... ;-)
glenn
|
9.1348 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:34 | 16 |
|
After a 20 all tie in regulation they will play some sudden-death
overtime which will get a whole new meaning when some older player has
a heart attack from the stress. An hour later (after two overtimes) we
will see several mistakes and noone will be able to move the ball.
Somewhere around the 9th overtime the 49er punter will catch the ball
and collapse (along with everyone else) from exaustion. Of course,
this will seem strange that a kicker will be exausted, but we all know
they aren't atheletes anyways. 10 minutes later the gatorade guy will
see a ball lying in the end zone (noone has picked it up yet) and go to
retreive it. The officials will be so exausted that they won't
realize that he is the 12 player on the field and Dallas will will
26-20.
Marc
|
9.1349 | top 'o his game | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:36 | 13 |
|
>> JJ not a motivator.
The guy has got a degree in Industrial Psychology, fer crissakes!
If he can make a John Deere lawnmower feel good about itself, imagine
what he's doing for his players.
|
9.1350 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:38 | 9 |
| glenn,
Haven't heard anything about depression w/ Johnson. I'd agree that it
doesn't seem he would be performing at this level if that were the
case. He defintetly is arrogant and cocky. If he coaches your
favorite team, you love it. I personally believe he's got some
misplaced priorities, but he didn't ask me!
- Rope
|
9.1351 | assh*les unite | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:52 | 6 |
| re last few.
All it goes to show is that he's got a big mouth & he's cheapening
a good game. Whether the Cowboys win or not I for one will not think
as much of JJ 'cause of his mouf.
Davie.
|
9.1352 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:55 | 3 |
| Cheapening a good game? That's what the Super Bowl and everything
leading up to it is all about -- HYPE. He's helping the network out.
More people will be tuning to see if JJ backs his comments up.
|
9.1353 | | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:10 | 6 |
| Well if what you say is true they must leave their minds at home in the
refrigerator. Me ? Hell i'm weird - I watch it because it's a GAME.
Two teams of top athletes pitted against one another. I don't think the
wind & piss that gets gassed around does much for the game, just more
for the individual's inflated ego.
Davie.
|
9.1355 | ex ex vee eye eye eye | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:25 | 6 |
| January 30 will bring us history's first-ever
six-digit Super Bowl.
Here's hoping it's NOT the two what went at it lasted year!
dr.a
|
9.1356 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:30 | 12 |
|
>>January 30 will bring us history's first-ever
>>six-digit Super Bowl.
Upon further review, that indicates "nobody under the age of 18
will be admitted to SuperBowl 30."
|
9.1357 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 17:08 | 7 |
| � Well if what you say is true they must leave their minds at home in the
� refrigerator. Me ? Hell i'm weird - I watch it because it's a GAME.
You're not wierd, you're a football fan. This hype isn't to attract
folks like you, it's to attract fans of teams who are not in the
playoffs and to attract the non-football fan. They know they've got
you hooked. They're trying to hook more.
|
9.1358 | Is it worth a tenner ? | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Fri Jan 21 1994 17:53 | 8 |
| -1 ; Very true but it always makes me shed a little more skin with each
little stunt they pull.
On another note; does anyone have any info on old swollen elbow v
cold ground with HFA (not necessarily in the playoffs). Off the top
of your head would do.
Davie.
|
9.1359 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sat Jan 22 1994 20:16 | 7 |
| re: hype
at least there is only one week between the Championship games and the
SB this year.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1360 | Get Your Ego Here | PAKORA::KMILNE | No sleep till Bedtime | Sun Jan 23 1994 08:11 | 16 |
| Maybe a little late in the day foor this and probably repeating what a
few others have said--but JJ is a great coach who just happens to have
a giant ego with a large enough mouth to let that ego spew forth every
now and then. Now I don't like the Cowboys very much, not even a little
bit if I'm honest but JJ has earned my resect the he's turned them
around. He's hardly the only person in the game who has overfuelled
ego. It's probably one of the things that raises the great from the
ordinary in this game. Supreme self belief is a must for competing at
the very top in any sport and about the only one that didn't ever let
everybody know how great he was, was Payton.
Oh yeah Dallas and Kansas in the SB, with KC winning it hopefully
Kenny
|
9.1361 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sun Jan 23 1994 20:38 | 7 |
| Play it again Sam. Dallas and Buffalo in the SB. Neither game was
particularly close.
Dallas is listed as a 10 point favorite.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1362 | Class of the NFL - Ain't Even Close | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Sun Jan 23 1994 22:04 | 18 |
| Dallas crushes San Francisco 38-21. The game was more lop-sided than
the score indicates! Total domination on both sides of the ball. This
team has shown the last two seasons that when it's focused, it's lights
out for the opposition. Before Aikman left with the concussion, I
counted one time that he was hit by a 49er lineman. Most of the time,
he had no one within 6 feet of him when he released the ball.
Defensively, Dallas played great. Ricky Watters and the 49ers learned
something today that frankly they should've known alot earlier through
watching film. NOBODY runs a sweep on the Cowboys. The Dallas
linebackers and lineman are too quick. Nice to see the hotdog Watters
thoroughly silenced.
HOW 'BOUT THEM COWBOYS!!!
2 straight Super Bowl victories.
- Rope
|
9.1363 | Same ole' guy. | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Mon Jan 24 1994 07:28 | 11 |
| BERNIE BERNIE BERNIE BERNIE BERNIE BERNIE BERNIE BERNIE
Leads Dallas to the game breaker.....45 yrd TD to Harper!
Then leads Dallas to another fieldgoal.
Go Bernie!
WOOF!
|
9.1364 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 24 1994 09:43 | 5 |
| > 2 straight Super Bowl victories.
don't count your chickens before they're hatched.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1365 | Bye Bye CBS | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Jan 24 1994 10:48 | 3 |
| Who watched till CBS went off the air and saw that final retrospective
with Summerall and Madden? That was pretty good,but the Gumbell /Terry
shtick was embarrassing.
|
9.1366 | Since "no one got hurt" ;-) I loved it... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 24 1994 11:04 | 19 |
|
> Who watched till CBS went off the air and saw that final retrospective
> with Summerall and Madden? That was pretty good,but the Gumbell /Terry
> shtick was embarrassing.
Best entertainment of the day was Coach Dikka being pelted by
snowballs in Buffalo and getting all worked up about it, responding
to his partner's postgame reconciliatory garbage of "well, Mike, it
wasn't really your intent to show disrespect to this great Buffalo
team, right?" with some comment about the taunters being the lousiest
fans he'd ever seen. Dikka was *hot*. Personally, given his own
underachieving track record with da Bearz and his role as a supposed
professional commentator, I thought his original remarks about the
Bills ("boring") were pretty stupid. But that's Dikka, thinking with
his spleen instead of his head, always embroiled in some kind of
controversy...
glenn
|
9.1367 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Mon Jan 24 1994 11:05 | 5 |
| Madden and Summerall was fine. The only thing worse than the thought
of Terry giving Greg some sugar was the Big Fan doing the same with
his wife.
Mike
|
9.1368 | | 38242::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 24 1994 11:07 | 6 |
| Looks like JJ was right.
2 anticlimatic conference championships = climatic Super Bowl? I hope
so.
Any word on Aikman?
|
9.1369 | hoping for a good game | FRETZ::HEISER | Matthew 5:18 | Mon Jan 24 1994 11:25 | 7 |
| Gumbel looked like he was gonna breakdown and cry.
The loser of this year's Super Bowl will have 4 losses in the Big Game.
Not only were the conference championships anticlimatic, but the past
SB's with only 1 week off beforehand have been very competitive (last
one was Bills-Giants and Norwood's wide right).
|
9.1370 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 24 1994 11:57 | 4 |
| yup, stuck around to see what Madden and Summerall would say at the end.
I would bet that they will both be on FOX next season.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1371 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 24 1994 12:06 | 3 |
| Former Jets coach Bruce Coslet has picked up by the Bengals to be their
offensive co-ordinator. Kind of ironic seeing how an ex-Bengal QB
helped get Coslet fired from the Jets.
|
9.1372 | NFL/CBS/FOX | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 24 1994 12:17 | 64 |
|
[email protected] articles by Jan 20 to 23, 1994:
--------
Subject: Madden and Summerall reportedly sign with Fox
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 94 20:31:23 PST
LOS ANGELES (UPI) -- The Fox Network reportedly made another valuable
acquisition Thursday, signing not only veteran National Football League
commentator John Madden but his broadcast partner for the last 13 years,
Pat Summerall, as well.
USA Today reported Friday that Madden and Summerall, CBS' number one
team for NFL telecasts, will be moving to the rival network. Fox outbid
CBS for the National Football Conference portion of the NFL television
package last month with an offer of $1.58 billion over four years.
USA Today reported that Madden was lured away from CBS with a four-
year deal worth more than $30 million. However, Madden said Friday that
he hadn't agreed anything or signed anything with Fox. But if the
reports are accurate, Madden will get a huge yearly increase in his
salary, going from $2.5 million a year with CBS to $7.5 million with
Fox. Madden was reportedly offered $4 million per year from NBC.
Madden's departure from CBS had been expected since Fox gained the
contract and he had been rumored heading to ABC and NBC as well in
recent weeks.
Figures for Summerall, who was earning $1.5 million per year at CBS,
were not available. Summerall's complete departure from CBS was not
expected. He has been the network's primary tennis and golf commentator.
CBS will use Jim Nantz on its golf coverage.
Madden and Summerall will work CBS' final NFL game for at least four
years Sunday when the Dallas Cowboys host the San Francisco 49ers in the
NFC title game. CBS has been broadcasting the NFL for 38 years.
--------
Subject: CBS bids farewell to NFL
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 94 17:20:40 PST
DALLAS (UPI) -- CBS bade an emotional farewell to pro football Sunday
night after 38 years of broadcasting National Football League games.
``It's a sad day,'' commentator Terry Bradshaw said during the
network's post-game show following the Dallas Cowboys' 38-21 victory
over the San Francscicso 49ers in the NFC Championship Game. ``My mike
is shaking. I'm nervous.''
Bradshaw then turned to the post-game show's co-host, Greg Gumbel,
and jokingly said he felt like kissing him. ``If you were a little
better looking, I'd give you some sugar,'' Bradshaw said with a broad
smile.
Starting next season, the Fox Network will broadcast NFC games, while
NBC continues to broadcast the AFC.
CBS lost out to Fox in its effort to keep the NFC broadcast rights.
``We don't have football at CBS any more, but we have the memories,''
a somber-faced John Madden said in a post-game farewell with play-by-
play man Pat Summerall.
Madden also thanked Summerall ``for 13 great years.''
The team had worked together for CBS for 13 years. Rumors are
circulating that they will be reunited on Fox next season, but that's
not certain. Summerall has said he has signed with Fox, but Madden has
been non-committal.
``I'm very proud to have watched the NFL grow on CBS,'' said
Summerall, who has worked with the network for 32 of the 38 years it
covered pro football.
Summerall then turned to Madden and said with a combination of humor
and sadness, ``I'm not going to tell you I love you, but I do like you a
lot.''
|
9.1373 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 24 1994 12:19 | 14 |
| > Former Jets coach Bruce Coslet has picked up by the Bengals to be their
> offensive co-ordinator. Kind of ironic seeing how an ex-Bengal QB
> helped get Coslet fired from the Jets.
FWIW, Boomer said on WFAN that he felt Coslett should not be fired. He
was very pro Coslett in an interview with Mike and The Mad Dog, when
Mike and Dog were coming down very hard on Coslett.
Coslett got himself fired when he refused to get an o-coordinator....
'Saw
|
9.1374 | | GWEN::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Mon Jan 24 1994 13:01 | 3 |
| WHat did Terry and Greg do? I watched Pat and John and then switched
to Primetime...
|
9.1375 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Mon Jan 24 1994 13:12 | 9 |
| Well, Greg kept biting his microphone to stop from crying. Terry,
obviously suffering from a concussion flashback brought on by Aikman's
injury, rambled for a bit and then told Greg if he was any cuter
(I think) he would give him some "sugar."
Greg was able to keep it together long enough to thank all the little
people. They then cut away before the group hug.
Mike
|
9.1376 | | GWEN::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Mon Jan 24 1994 13:29 | 2 |
| I wonder what Bryant would have said...
|
9.1377 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Mon Jan 24 1994 14:39 | 3 |
| Or Mussbuger, or Jimmy the Greek, or whats her face and even Irv
Cross.
|
9.1378 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 24 1994 14:56 | 13 |
| I listened to Mike and the Mad Dog on the FAN today, from Atlanta while
I was out running errands at lunch.
Evidently Terry and Greg are pretty close friends, and that had something
to do with yesterday's sign-off. Least that was M&MD's cut at it.
A guy I work with lives next door to Gumbel, and he's a really geniunely
sensitive guy, who's down to earth and quite caring. (I don't want to
print a lot of Gumbel stories, since it would betray a confidence).
So, I'm not surprised that Greg was a bit sensitive yesterday.
'Saw
|
9.1379 | | GWEN::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:06 | 4 |
| I know they were buddies... but so are Pat and John and they handled it
better.
|
9.1380 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shadowlands | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:06 | 1 |
| Pat & John aren't men of the '90's though [sic].
|
9.1381 | | GWEN::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:10 | 3 |
| I thought Terry was the QB of the 70's though... around the time Madden
was coaching...
|
9.1382 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shadowlands | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:11 | 1 |
| but he was a real main when he wore the uniform.
|
9.1383 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:16 | 4 |
| Yabbut, you almost expect the weird and unexpected from Gumbel and Bradshaw
since they've been so silly ever since I can remember....
8^)
|
9.1384 | | GWEN::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:19 | 2 |
| Which is why I watch Gameday from 12-1... or Costas on NFL Live before
he left. Never really got into Greg and Terry.
|
9.1385 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Jan 24 1994 15:28 | 4 |
| /er is being a weasly wimp. he won't give 10 points for someone taking Buffalo
in the SB.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1386 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Jan 24 1994 18:25 | 13 |
| I never liked Bradshame, and I'm glad I missed his pass. I would
of laughed and hurled at the same time. Hopefully FOX won't pick him
up.
I picked 'em wrong thised weekend. Both home teams completely
dominated the line of scrimmage. I hope Buffalo wins it just because I
dislike the cowpokes more (and the AFC is past due). Then again, seeing
Buffalo being losers of 4 staright SB's is appealing.
I just hope its a good game. I have a bottle of Champagne left over
from the Holidays and was looking for a good excuse to pop it open.
Tim
|
9.1387 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Mon Jan 24 1994 18:48 | 7 |
|
I'm pretty sure I read today that Bradshaw will sign with FOX.
It looks like Madden will profit nicely with FOx taking over the NFC. Rumors
are of a tripling in Salary for big john...
Metz
|
9.1388 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Babe Hockey | Mon Jan 24 1994 19:05 | 10 |
| re-Madden
I liked how he & Summerall were spewing out how Leon Lett got his
hand in to deflect a pass from Young and on and on, then on replay it
showed it was Haley, then all of a sudden its Haley spew and how he
makes something happen every play and on...
Don't most players make something happen every play?
It made me laugh anyway......
|
9.1389 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Tue Jan 25 1994 08:11 | 5 |
| So, how long is Montana's contract for? After the way he's
been in and out this year, I'd think that KC would be much
better off working with a good, young QB.
Scott
|
9.1390 | Madden signs with Fox | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Jan 25 1994 11:20 | 41 |
|
[email protected] articles by Mon, 24 Jan 94:
--------
Subject: Fox signs Madden to four-year deal
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 94 10:03:31 PST
NEW YORK (UPI) -- Ending weeks of speculation, 15-year CBS football
announcer John Madden signed a four-year contract with Fox Sports
Monday, according to David Hill, president of the network's sports
division.
Madden, a nine-time Emmy Award winner and one of the most popular of
pro football's broadcast voices, will be the lead analyst for Fox's
coverage of the National Football League's NFC games.
``I am happy to be with the Fox Network, and I look forward to
working with them,'' said Madden. ``I've spent 15 years covering NFL
football, mainly the NFC, and that is what I enjoy and want to be doing.
I met with (Fox chairman and chief executive officer) Rupert Murdoch and
was very impressed with his ideas and vision of television and football.
''
From Dec. 18, when Fox officially announced its purchase of the
rights to televise NFC games for an unprecedented $1.58 billion, Madden
has been rumored to join Fox. In doing such, he will be part of the
network's new division that was created primarily to accommodate its NFC
coverage, said Jeff DeRome, Fox executive director for publicity.
``John Madden is the heartbeat of football,'' said Hill. ``Fox Sports
is absolutely thrilled to know that our coverage of the game will be
brought to the American public by the best in the world.''
In outbidding CBS for the rights to televise NFC games, Fox ended
CBS' 32-year hold on NFL television coverage. CBS' final game was its
broadcast Sunday of Dallas' 38-21 win over San Francisco in the NFC
Championship game.
After coaching the former Oakland Raiders to seven AFC Western
Division titles and a Super Bowl victory over Minnesota, Madden joined
CBS in 1979. He excelled in broadcasting and was named ``Sports
Personality of the Year'' by the American Sportscasters Association in
1985 and 1992. Also in 1982, he became the first expert analyst to be
honored with the prestigious ``Golden Mike'' Award by the Touchdown Club
of America.
--------
|
9.1391 | The swami sez... | ROCK::MURPHY | Illini = overrated | Tue Jan 25 1994 11:23 | 46 |
| Super Bowl Prediction:
Dallas 147, Buffalo 10. Buffalo scores the first field goal of the
game after an impressive 98-yard drive, then scores on a last-minute TD
using a Frank Reich-led hurry-up offense.
Dallas scores on each of its 21 possessions without ever attaining a
first down, bringing up many comparisons to Georgia Tech's thrashing of
Cumberland 222-0 in the 1930s. This, despite the fact that every single Cowboy
begins the game with at least one separated shoulder.
Emmitt Smith gains 683 yards, a Super Bowl and John Madden '93 Sega
record, with 335 of those yards gained while still playing after suffering a
painfully broken pelvis early in the 2nd quarter. Troy Aikman throws
for 585 yards, eclipsing Norm Van Brocklin's record, but unfortunately is
knocked out late in the 3rd quarter by a blitzing Daryl Talley. Because of severe
concussion Troy is unable to participate in the postgame press
conference because his speech center is destroyed, leaving him only with the
ability to hum the UCLA fight song ad nauseum.
Jimmy Johnson later claims he wasn't trying to run up the score,
although he is criticized by the media for leaving Emmitt in until the 3:14 mark of
the 4th quarter. The game is delayed for 45 minutes in the 3rd quarter,
due to a freak accident. A large buildup of static electricity is generated
when the Goodyear blimp collides in midair with the guy who parachuted in at the
Holyfield-Bowe fight and the airship rubs against the Georgia Dome roof
fabric, with the effect being frighteningly similar to that achieved
when rubbing a balloon on one's head. This blimp-induced static discharge
is of such enormous magnitude that Jimmy Johnson's hair actually is lifted
off of its moorings. Were the Goodyear blimp filled with hydrogen instead of
helium, the incident could have been much worse.
Leon Lett misses the game, driving hopelessly around I-285 in search of
the Georgia Dome.
Highlight of the game: After a rousing halftime celebration done up
Dixie-style, complete with a star-studded ensemble of country musicians, the
Hooters women, and a Haiku reading by Minnie Pearl, John Wayne Bobbitt
is given an Espy at midfield for Most SportsManlike Conduct after
mentioning that despite Lorena's acquittal, John still has no hard feelings.
Well, that's my prediction.
Murph
|
9.1393 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 25 1994 12:50 | 3 |
| yo /er you're losing ground. spread is now 10.5
The Crazy Met
|
9.1394 | SPEED KILLS! | 35223::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Tue Jan 25 1994 12:51 | 9 |
| I think the Cowboys will cover the spread and much more. IMO, after
this game, people will be comparing this Cowboy club to some of the
great teams in NFL history.
Watch closely, I you won't see Bruce (I'm the Greatest) Smith lineup
one time on the left side of the line. Eric Williams will absolutely
dominate any man one-on-one. Ask Reggie White!
- Rope
|
9.1395 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Tue Jan 25 1994 14:01 | 12 |
|
Buffalos only chance is running the ball up the gut the same way they did
against KC. Sweeps will get them nothing. Dallas will score at least 24 points
against the bills and the Bills will need to match score for score against the
Boys.
Buffaloes defensive line will not be a match for the Cowboys o-line. For all
his ranting and raving about how he should be the NFL's defensive player of the
year it's put up or shut up time for Bruce Smith. I fully expect him to be
neutralized and the Cowboys to have an easy 24-10 victory.....
Metz
|
9.1396 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Pay me $30mil to spew | Tue Jan 25 1994 14:02 | 11 |
| re-1
I thought this cowgirl team was already being compared/labeled one of
the greatest ever, and they have only won 1 SB. Of course most people
are saying the Bills should just mail it in.
If the Dall-ass defense stops Thurmal, then they stop the Bills! No
running game = SB loser. The more you throw, typically the more
tunrovers = SB loser.
Tim
|
9.1397 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | prisoners here of our own device | Tue Jan 25 1994 16:13 | 12 |
| What's this about Clinton nominating William Perry fer Secretary fo
Defense????
I mean, the Fridge may have been good in his day, but I don't think
that he was GREAt and should therefore preside over the Nation's
defense.
Sheez is Clinton a jerk er what...he could have at least nominated Joe
Greene ahead of Perry.....
JaKe
|
9.1398 | only if Clarke and Thomas stayed out foul trouble | CNTROL::CHILDS | Betcha A$$ I hate DallA$$ | Tue Jan 25 1994 16:16 | 13 |
|
best comment sunday was Summerall's after Dixon Edwards hit Waters....
"Ricky better go back for another load of wood" hahahaa
dallas in a romp like Rope said...
pname bets taken
Murph classic especially the crack about JJ.....
mikey
|
9.1400 | Excellent Holtzian reply Tommy, kudos! | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Jan 25 1994 16:50 | 1 |
|
|
9.1402 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 25 1994 17:05 | 8 |
| In the Giants-Bills SB the Bills were the better team. The Giants executed
their game plan almost perfectly - and that was to control the ball on the
ground. If Buffalo can do that - Thurman Thomas certainly is a great ball
carrier - they should keep it close and with a break could even win the
game. Dallas is a better team, but a well executed game plan could beat
them.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1403 | Another New Yuck team will bite the dust Sunday | PTOVAX::JACOB | prisoners here of our own device | Tue Jan 25 1994 17:12 | 11 |
| TCM,
Ya fergot one factor in yer note -.1. The Bills, even though Baffalo
is far away from New Yuck City, are a "New Yuck" team, so the ol' bone
in the throat is signed sealed and will be delivered on Sunday before
84 zillion drunk and disorderly TV watchers, who will turn it off about
halfway thru the 2nd qtr cause th Bills will be so far behind an act of
God couldn't help em.
JaKe
|
9.1404 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 25 1994 17:14 | 6 |
| uh Jakester, Giants didn't choke in their SB appearances. Now of course
there was this team that had a punt blocked late in the 4th quarter in
this years playoffs. Can you name that team????
The Crazy Met
|
9.1405 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | prisoners here of our own device | Tue Jan 25 1994 17:20 | 23 |
|
>>there was this team that had a punt blocked late in the 4th quarter in
>>this years playoffs. Can you name that team????
Lessee, was it the Giants...er no...the Oilers...er no...the 49ers...er
no...uhm, err, the Vikings...er no, the Lions.....nope again....I
dunno, sorta slips my mind at this time.
>>uh Jakester, Giants didn't choke in their SB appearances. Now of course
I'm talking RECENT, like the year long bone-in-the-throat the Mucking
Fets had....the Jets wonderful upswing at the end of the season....the
Rangers-need I say more??....the Giants "close game" against the
49ers...
AND now the BIlls upcoming embarrassment in Atlanta on Sunday.
4 Super Bowls in a row, 3 losses and the fourth coming fer Baffalo
hahahahahahahaha
JaKe
|
9.1406 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | prisoners here of our own device | Tue Jan 25 1994 17:20 | 5 |
| BTW, I'm talking the Rangers in the playoffs lasted year...not the
current season.
JaKe
|
9.1407 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 25 1994 17:26 | 12 |
| uh JaKe, you really are trying to forget. See the Rangers didn't even make
the playoffs last year. It was the Penguins that choked lasted year
when they lost to the Islanders in 7 games.
Mets were plain bad last year - sort of like saying the 1985 and 1986 Pirates
choked. Now the 1992 Pirates in game 7 of the NLCS ...
The Crazy Met
btw somehow the Rangers will probably find a way to lose this year :-(
Messier, Graves, Leetch, or Richter will get injured in late March or
early April :-(
|
9.1408 | Sheesh, I though it was BARFalllo! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jan 25 1994 22:50 | 1 |
|
|
9.1409 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Wed Jan 26 1994 04:39 | 5 |
| My wife is staying in Atlanta this week and called me this morning to
say that the Cowboys are staying in her hotel. Said she saw Troy
Aikman getting in a limo last night. Sez he's GAWD!
Mark_in_Taiwan.
|
9.1410 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Betcha A$$ I hate DallA$$ | Wed Jan 26 1994 08:40 | 6 |
|
2 hits into the game and ole Thurmal Nukedout Thomas will be wavin' to the
sidelines for K. Davis. Aikman is the real deal Tommy and with an ace in the
hole like Emitt, the Bills don't stand a chance.....
mikey
|
9.1411 | Thurman is a real deal too... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Wed Jan 26 1994 09:21 | 6 |
| I really think that its gonna be a better game than most think. When
everyones thinking on the high and mighty cowboys to win don't be
surprized. I mean this is Buffalos 4th SB appearance. There due to win
or atleast make a game of it...
stig
|
9.1412 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 26 1994 09:21 | 5 |
| � AND now the BIlls upcoming embarrassment in Atlanta on Sunday.
�
� 4 Super Bowls in a row, 3 losses and the fourth coming fer Baffalo
When was the last time the Steelers were in the Super Bowl?
|
9.1413 | JJ & Levy -- different approaches to the same goal | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 26 1994 10:12 | 80 |
| From: [email protected] (MIKE RABUN, UPI Sports Writer)
Subject: Super Bowl mind games begin
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 94 12:51:41 PST
ATLANTA (UPI) -- Long before the real game starts, the mind games
begin at the Super Bowl. This year, they began on a Tuesday.
``They have to have some frustration with the Super Bowl,'' Dallas
Coach Jimmy Johnson said, easing a subtle elbow into the ribs of the
Buffalo Bills. ``After all, they have lost three Super Bowls in a row.''
``I tell the players I don't think of them in those terms,'' retorted
Buffalo Coach Marv Levy. ``And they shouldn't think that way, either. I
tell them I think they are one of the toughest-minded bunch of
individuals I've ever seen. Be proud of it.''
Super Bowl XXVIII, the first ever to be played by two teams that met
the previous year, will present the same off-the-field contrast it did a
year ago. Johnson, the master motivator, will coach against Levy, the
professorial wordsmith who leaves it up to his own players to get
excited about the task at hand.
``I think Marv has done a heck of job,'' Johnson said in assessing
his rival for next Sunday's game. ``To be able to get his team back to
this game year after year means he has done a great job.''
``I don't study Jimmy Johnson,'' Levy said in return. ``I may study
Abraham Lincoln, but I don't study Jimmy Johnson.''
The two coaches will not cross paths until they arrive at the Georgia
Dome Sunday for the climax of the professional football season. But the
marks they leave on their individual teams this week will go a long way
to deciding the outcome.
Johnson and Levy both discussed a little of their coaching philosophy
Tuesday on what the National Football League calls Picture Day. All the
participants in next Sunday's game showed up at the Georgia Dome Tuesday
-- first the Cowboys and then the Bills -- to pose for photos and to
discuss whatever was on the collective mind of hundreds of writers and
broadcasters.
Neither team conducted workouts Tuesday, but both will begin their
full-scale preparations Wednesday. Buffalo's practice sessions will be
held at Georgia Tech in midtown and the Cowboys will work at the
practice facility 30 miles to the northeast normally used by the Atlanta
Falcons.
As the week before any game progresses, Johnson will do whatever he
can to not only boost the morale of his players but to deflate the
opposition. He freely admits it and that practice only intensifies for
the big games.
His pre-game prediction of a win prior to last Sunday's meeting with
the San Francisco 49ers was an obvious example.
``But I do believe every single game demands different approaches,''
Johnson said Tuesday. ``You have a different feel about what you have to
do to be successful.
``I try never to have a negative approach. If I plant seeds, the ones
I want to plant are positive. The seeds I want to plant in the
opponent's minds are negative.
``I want our guys to be totally focused. Work, plus attitude,
determines performance. You really can't do anything about how talented
you are. On a daily basis, we all have certain skills and talents. Over
a long period of time, we can improve those skills. But for today and
this week, our team has just so much talent.
``Now, the two things that will cause your performance to vary are
your attitude and your work. I will make sure they work. But if they can
program themselves to be as positive as they can be, that will
significantly improve their performance.
``So don't get too concerned about how talented you are. You focus in
on what your attitude is on a daily basis.''
Levy, meanwhile, said he likes to stay away from any attempt to
``psyche,'' his players.
``I rarely use a psychological ploy,'' he said. ``We may show them a
very meaningful tape the night before the game or something provocative,
but we don't go around looking for it.
``If somebody said something provocative about our team on television
or something, we might show it, but I've maybe done it three times in
seven years since I've been here.
``What I think our approach this week has to be is to concentrate on
the game. All of the other things are the foam. The game is the beer. So
we're going to concentrate on our preparation and seeking to play at our
best and what we have to do against our opponent.
``It doesn't make any difference if we practice in the morning or the
afternoon. It doesn't make any difference if we practice at Georgia Tech
or someplace else. What makes a difference is what we do when they tee
the ball up and it's kicked off.''
|
9.1414 | | GWEN::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Wed Jan 26 1994 10:16 | 4 |
| Mark's in Taiwan, Vivian's in Atlanta during Super Bowl Week... Is
there something wrong with this picture? Mark, think your wife would
switch places with you?
|
9.1416 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Wed Jan 26 1994 12:54 | 13 |
| I'm a Dallas fan and if the Bills won I wouldn't be anymore surprised
than you. But to say Aikman would fold with Bruce Smith or Cornelius
Bennett breathing down his neck is not far off the mark. But ANY QB who
was in this same situation would stand a good chance of folding. Most
would throw intercepts, or fumble when hit. A young or a Randell would
try and run but most would either eat the ball, force the ball or get
hit and fumble.
JJ knows this and got the players to protect Aikman and Aikman takes
full advantage of this. Is this a sin? There are lesser qb's who even
with the time Aikman has wouldn't be as effective as he.
Jim Kelly supposedly has a decent line protecting him but he threw 18
intercepts, Aikman had 6.
|
9.1417 | My mother could complete passesd with a great line in front of her | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Wed Jan 26 1994 13:03 | 10 |
|
Name one great QB that didnt have a great line in front of him!!
None of them become great by themselves. Look at Montana this year. Not
having that great 9er line he had in the 80's has given him a year long
headache among other injuries.
Aikman has a great line and good receivers to throw, but it also
helps to have a great arm to go with it.
Keith
|
9.1418 | Right Up The Gut... | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | God can be so appreciated! | Wed Jan 26 1994 14:12 | 27 |
| As someone said earlier, I think the key is for the Bills
offensive line to physically push the Cowboys defense. They
MUST succeed at very quick runs right up the middle. It is
obvious that you have to have some success running and that
running east to west is not how its gonna happen against Dallas.
So run in such a way that defensive speed is minimized so much as
possible. Push the line back and hit the line of scrimmage FAST.
I know it goes back a lot of years, but in 1967, the Pack played
the LA Rams in the playoffs (game before famous ice bowl). The
Rams were 11-1-2 having just come off an impressive anihilation
of the then 10-0-2 Colts 34-7. They had something like 9 sacks.
The Pack were heavy underdogs against the Rams and their vaunted
fearsome foursome (Deacon Jones, Merlin Olsen, Roosevelt Grier, and
Lamar Lundy).
Well, the Pack hit the line of scrimmage before the Rams line was
barely able to set up. They sent Travis Williams up the gut in
an instant. The game was no contest - 28-7 Green Bay.
I really think the Bills must succeed by having some push by their
offensive line and gaining yardage right up the gut.
If they can't do that, its all over. If they can, just maybe...
Tony
|
9.1419 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 26 1994 14:35 | 9 |
|
Tommy "the predictor" Brydie....
Let's hope your prognosticating skills are a little better than the guarentee
of UCLA's vistory over Wisconsin.....
Bills to cover...what a charlie brown prediction....
Metz
|
9.1420 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 26 1994 14:44 | 14 |
| > Bills to cover...what a charlie brown prediction....
It can't be that easy of prediction. The spread keeps inching up. So
at the very least most folks think the spread is too low. I happen to
agree that the Bills will cover.
Key for me is will the Bills have lost the game before it ever begins.
In Denver's last SB appearance it seemed like the Broncos already knew
the game was lost before they took the field. If the Bills still believe
on Sunday that they can win then they need to hold on to the ball. Both
against GB and SF the big turning point came when Dallas scored after
a turnover to take a commanding lead.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1422 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 26 1994 16:03 | 20 |
|
ah, the old pick on the spelling skills. A classic last resort when you have no
more ammo in the old six gun.
I meant it's a girly-mon prediction...Either pick the Bills to win or don't
bother making a prediction....A prediction to cover when there is nothing on
the line ($$$$$) isn't worth the time spent typing it in.
TCM...they only reason the line keeps moving up is because the public sees the
relative ability between the teams and knows a good thing when they see it. The
line would be moving down or staying the same if the public thought predicting
the winner was such a tough decision.
Metz
I'd like to see the bills win but it's not going to happen. Dallas in a big
way. The spread is insignificant in a super bowl game...
|
9.1424 | both only 1 week layoff before the SB | FRETZ::HEISER | shadowlands | Wed Jan 26 1994 16:39 | 4 |
| > Giants 20 Bills 19. Tell the people who bet that game that the spread is
> insignigicant.
...and the 49er-Bengals game too.
|
9.1425 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 26 1994 16:43 | 4 |
| 49er's covered in their first SB meeting with the Bengals (81 season?).
What was the spread in 1988 season?
The Crazy Met
|
9.1426 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shadowlands | Wed Jan 26 1994 16:52 | 2 |
| I don't know, but wasn't the final 20-16? That's the one I'm referring
to.
|
9.1427 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 26 1994 16:56 | 3 |
| They were both close games. I think 20-16 was the 1988 season's SB.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1429 | although Tommy manged to sweep the NOTY PITA awards... | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 26 1994 17:16 | 7 |
|
It doesn't matter how much you win by...what matters is that you win....
His pain in the assness,
Metz
|
9.1430 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 26 1994 17:18 | 3 |
| not always. just ask ND about that 7 point win against FSU.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1431 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shadowlands | Wed Jan 26 1994 17:45 | 4 |
| I think there's a few errors in Tommy's last reply. Houston isn't the
only team to have not played in the Super Bowl. You can add Cleveland,
Seattle, San Diego, Phoenix, Detroit, Tampa Bay, New Orleans, and
Atlanta.
|
9.1432 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 26 1994 17:54 | 5 |
|
Must have gotten the information from the Arizona media guide :-)
Metz
|
9.1433 | reading comprehension 101 | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 26 1994 18:09 | 10 |
| MikeH no mistakes in what Tommy posted:
"We only have 1 team left in the playoffs that's never been to the
big game...Houston."
The key here is the part - 1 team left in the playoffs - that statement
was certainly true.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1434 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | prisoners here of our own device | Wed Jan 26 1994 23:12 | 9 |
| Yeah, what TC(whatever) said, and look at the date of the reply Tommy
posted, it's Jan 11th.
Tweren't talking about
all-time-never-made-it-to-the-Super-Bowl-whining-sore-losers, just
about the teams that was left in the playoffs.
JaKe
|
9.1436 | I said also... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Thu Jan 27 1994 09:12 | 3 |
| re -1. read note .1411.
stig
|
9.1437 | not a factor this year... | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Thu Jan 27 1994 09:22 | 6 |
|
Little-known fack:
No team that won in their first Super Bowl appearance
has ever been beaten in a subsequent appearance.
dr.a
|
9.1438 | Dallas 30 Buffalo 13 | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Jan 27 1994 09:34 | 1 |
|
|
9.1439 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shadowlands | Thu Jan 27 1994 09:57 | 7 |
| > just about everyone else does. Other than TCM and Tony Barbieri, I have
> yet to hear from a single person who doesn't expect Dallas to blow Buffalo
I guess it was previously missed, but I may as well stand and be counted.
I expect Buffalo to cover and have a very good chance at winning it
outright. There's a local guy that says, "No want no steenkin points,
don't need no steenkin points. Bills are gonna win."
|
9.1440 | I like the matchups... | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Thu Jan 27 1994 10:19 | 18 |
| On paper, it's a close game.
At QB, both have two solid performers.
If a big edge exists anywhere, it's on the offensive line for the
'Boys. Newton and Williams outweigh the Bills' line on their own.
But take your pick from the lists below:
QB Kelly/Reich Aikman/Kosar
RB Thomas/Davis Smith/Geisic(sp?)
TE McClelland Novacek
WR Reed/Brooks Harper/Irvin
Beebe
DL Smith Jeffcoat/Haley
LB Talley/Bennett Norton
ST Tasker Gant
Considering Aikman and Smith are likely dinged, I like the Bills' chances.
dr.a
|
9.1441 | JJ's Top 5 reasons why he said the Cowboys would beat SF | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 27 1994 12:42 | 28 |
|
[email protected] articles by Wed, 26 Jan 94:
--------
Subject: Johnson reveals reasons for forecast
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 94 15:38:51 PST
ATLANTA (UPI) -- When Dallas Coach Jimmy Johnson said last week prior
to the NFC Championship game that, ``we will win the ballgame,'' he said
there were various reasons he chose to make the prediction.
After Dallas did beat San Francisco, Johnson said he did it chiefly
to ease the tensions he thought were building up in his own team. But
there was more to it than that.
Johnson gave the Dallas Cowboys' public relations director a note
before the San Francisco game, listing the reasons for his actions. He
asked the PR man to make the list public if the Cowboys lost because
Johnson did not plan to stay in Dallas long enough to explain.
That list was made public Wednesday. His reasons, listed in order,
were:
1 -- I believe it.
2 -- Game is at home.
3 -- Takes pressure off players.
4 -- Gives players bottom-line, no-excuses attitude.
5 -- May fertilize seeds of doubt in 49ers.
And then Johnson added a note.
``If we win, maybe it gives us an edge,'' he wrote. ``If not, I can't
get any lower so I don't give a damn what people think.''
|
9.1442 | Bradshaw going to Fox | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 27 1994 12:42 | 23 |
|
[email protected] articles by Wed, 26 Jan 94:
Subject: Bradshaw reportedly also moving to Fox
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 94 8:56:25 PST
NEW YORK (UPI) -- Terry Bradshaw reportedly is the latest broadcaster
ready to move to the Fox Network.
New York Newsday reported Tuesday that Bradshaw has agreed to join
Fox as co-host of its National Football League pre-game show and an
announcement could come as early as Thursday.
Bradshaw reportedly will receive $650,000 annually in a four-year
deal.
Fox announced the signing of veteran commentator John Madden Monday
to a four-year deal worth a reported $30 million. Reports also indicate
that Madden's longtime partner, Pat Summerall, also will be moving from
CBS to Fox with a four-year deal worth $1.5 million annually.
Bradshaw, the former Pittsburgh Steelers star quarterback and a
member of four Super Bowl champions, has been a co-host on CBS' ``The
NFL Today'' pre-game show for three years.
Fox, which secured the National Football Conference package with a
bid of $1.58 billion over four years, also reportedly is close to deals
with veteran CBS producers Bob Stenner, Sandy Grossman and Ed Goren.
|
9.1443 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:29 | 3 |
| hmm, report I saw had Bradshaw doubling the 650K he was getting at CBS.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1444 | too funny | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:30 | 7 |
| Anyone else see Shaughnessy's article about Atlanta's sports venues
in Tuesday's(?) globe. In it he basically says Boston is way behind and
does a pretty good bash job. This from the guy who wrote that article
glorifying Boston and denigrating St. Louis a while back. Would
be nice if he made up his mind.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1445 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:35 | 2 |
| TCM, I'm surprised at you (well, not really). How does Shaughnessy
saying that Boston > St.Louis invalidate him saying Atlanta > Boston?
|
9.1446 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Phoenix Open Hostage | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:36 | 7 |
|
Not having read the article, I'd say comparing a city that is preparing
for the Olympics and the SB, to a team isn't going to get either in the
near future, is an unfair comparison. Compare Atlanta's facilities 3-4
years ago, beffore Atlanta built up for the Olympics.
brews
|
9.1447 | megabucks for everyone | FRETZ::HEISER | shadowlands | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:37 | 2 |
| makes you wonder where Fox is getting all this $$ that they're throwing
at everyone.
|
9.1448 | the tone of the article as much as anything else | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:41 | 4 |
| nah, its just in that original article Shaughnessy was extolling Boston's
virtues as being one of a few world class cities.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1449 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:43 | 13 |
| re: .1446
Brews,
Sure the comparison in that sense is not fair. One of the major points
in the article was that Atlanta has a Business-Government Sports Committee
which encouraged things like the Georgia Dome and raising funds for the Olympic
bid, etc. Ittook a very short time for them to go ahead and sign-off on these
things. On the other hand he was complaining that in Boston it is likely to
take years and years to even agree on projects like these, much less build
them.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1450 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:46 | 6 |
| �On the other hand he was complaining that in Boston it is likely to
�take years and years to even agree on projects like these, much less build
�them.
I still don't understand your problem with the article. Sounds like he
hit it on the head with this statement.
|
9.1451 | Haven't you caught on to the guy yet, TCM? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 27 1994 13:57 | 7 |
|
What's really surprising is that, like those rubes from Saint Lou that
wrote nasty, bigoted letters back to the Globe, TCM actually took that
exaggerated tongue-in-cheek (albeit lame) Shaughnessy column seriously...
glenn
|
9.1453 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 14:19 | 5 |
| Mac, the guy should make up his mind - if he really has one.
Tommy pretty much got the point. You didn't.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1454 | Desperately wanting Buffalo; low expectations... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 27 1994 14:23 | 29 |
|
> All I'm telling you is that I expect this game to be a lot closer than
> just about everyone else does. Other than TCM and Tony Barbieri, I have
> yet to hear from a single person who doesn't expect Dallas to blow Buffalo
> away. Myself, I expect Buffalo to cover and possibly win.
Tommy, I have no desire to get into a another LDUC, as anyone is
entitled to change his/her mind (as I have on the Cowboys' prowess
with an obviously near-100% healthy Emmitt Smith), but I am legitimately
interested as to why you now think that Buffalo's defense will provide
any match at all for the Dallas' O, when a week ago you thought that
after the way the Cowboys manhandled Reggie White and Co. that the
Bills wouldn't see a much better fate. Kansas City was your #2 team
in the NFL, or at least the best shot to beat Dallas, no?
I don't think that Buffalo can't cover; hey, that's a coin flip and as
Green Bay proved can easily happen even in a blowout with a couple
backdoor scores, but as far as being able to win, I think you had it
right the first time. A lot of this stuff about Troy Aikman being
vulnerable if pressured sounds identical to what I heard last
year. What's really changed, personnel-wise? Jim Kelly still stands
to be the guy under the heavy pressure and making the critical mistakes.
The Bills surely won't commit even half the number of last year's 9
turnovers, but I still don't see it being enough. As much as I'll be
rooting for Buffalo to win, I just can't see it even if they play
almost out of their heads...
glenn
|
9.1455 | | DECWET::METZGER | To sleep, perchance to dream... | Thu Jan 27 1994 14:40 | 21 |
| > I don't think that Buffalo can't cover; hey, that's a coin flip and as
> Green Bay proved can easily happen even in a blowout with a couple
> backdoor scores
which is why I got on Tommy's case with his meaningless Charlie Brown
prediction of the Bills to cover. He has since clarified that he thinks the
game will be a close one and they might even win which says a heck of a lot
more than "I think they'll cover."
I don't see the difference between last year. Bruce Smith didn't do squat and I
don't see anything different this year. Dallas ran right at him last year and
they'll do it again. Third and long will equate to 3rd and 2 this game because
the Cowboys will be ripping off huge chunks of yardage on 1st and 2nd downs...
Metz
|
9.1457 | | DECWET::METZGER | To sleep, perchance to dream... | Thu Jan 27 1994 14:52 | 15 |
| not to mention a lack of kids activity days and a nice tourist waterfront area
(esp for a city made out of beach front fill).
The aquarium is great, Science museum adequate, good public transportation, the
parks (the few their are) are good (during the daytime).
Throw in a woeful lack of parking, poor direct driving access to most
everyplace, lack of a real city central place and not very clean.
I guess for an old US city it has it's charm (mostly due to history) but the
political hackery will always prevent it from the revamping it needs to be
first class and attract the major events (superbowl, national political
conventions, Olympics, major presidential conferences...etc)
Metz
|
9.1458 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 14:58 | 23 |
| Bills will try a different game plan than last year. This is basically the same
Dallas team as last year and Buffalo should have a good idea what won't work;
they also played earlier this season, Emmit Smith did not play. The Bills
O line should be able to puncture some holes for Thomas to run through. Kelly
will need to concentrate on short passes (ala the 49ers in the past). As long
as the Dallas offense does not have the ball they can't score. Bills need to
play the kind of game that the Giants played against them in the 1990 SB.
As long as Buffalo can keep it close into the 4th they have a chance.
I also think the Bills D will play better than last year - heck how could
they play worse? They should be fast enough to string out the pursuit,
absolutely mandatory they get this done in the 1st quarter. After that Dallas
may be forced to change their game plan and then Buffalo throws the blits into
the equation.
No turnovers! If Buffalo turns the ball over 2-3 times they are cooked. Bills
have to claw at the ball when Dallas is on offense; they need to make the
receivers and the running back(s) "feel some pain".
Rooting for Buffalo, but they need to play a perfect game (see Villanova
against Georgetwon in 1985)
The Crazy Met
|
9.1461 | It's a done deal. Go with Dallas! | KALI::MORGAN | | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:15 | 5 |
| Until reading all this fawning over the Bills prospects, I thought
Buffalo and the points might be a risk worth taking! Thanks for giving
me a slap upside the head and the sense to go with Dallas guys!
Steve
|
9.1462 | | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:17 | 6 |
|
RE. 1460
Is that a P-name bet or for something more lucrative?
Cadzilla2
|
9.1463 | | DECWET::METZGER | To sleep, perchance to dream... | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:20 | 16 |
| You don't get it do you Tommy?
Even the statement "Buffalo will cover" by itself is about as meaningless as it
gets....
suppose the cowboys are up by 17 points..buffalo goes down the field and score
with 2 seconds left on the clock...Yippeee...buffalo covers. It doesn't mean
the game was good or exciting or close. It just means buffalo covered the point
spread and tommy's prediction was right...
Saying you expect a good close game that goes down to the wire with buffalo
having a chance to win it is expressing a meaningful opinion. Stating buffalo
will cover is not.
Metz
|
9.1464 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:28 | 5 |
| > Stating buffalo will cover is not.
Unless you're betting.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1465 | | DECWET::METZGER | To sleep, perchance to dream... | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:31 | 5 |
|
as I mentioned earlier...
Metz
|
9.1466 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:33 | 7 |
| �Even the statement "Buffalo will cover" by itself is about as meaningless as it
�gets....
They didn't cover last year, did they?
And stating that they will cover is at least as meaningful as saying
they won't get blown out.
|
9.1467 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Mark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces. | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:33 | 10 |
|
I'm gonna go out on a limb here.... :-)
Dallas 51
Buffalo 13
Chap
|
9.1469 | Good point about that mindset differ | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:34 | 8 |
| Tommy that last note of yours has started to convince me to perhaps
take a chance on he afc for the 10th time in a row.
That neighbor of mine that owes me a sawski from the series will be
anxious to go with dallas but will hate giving points.
I'll have to call him - got nothing to lose haven't seen the $10 since
oct. anyway
|
9.1470 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:37 | 6 |
| Bill the Elder,
hold off until tomorrow or Saturday, spread could keep going up and it is
very unlikely that it will come down.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1471 | | DECWET::METZGER | To sleep, perchance to dream... | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:37 | 9 |
|
well...why the hell didn't you say so instead of just sprouting off...
you're betting that the bills will cover...not stating that the bills will
cover...
Metz
|
9.1472 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:39 | 4 |
| Metz, stating/betting sort of the same thing. Betting is a stronger
statement than just saying it.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1473 | | DECWET::METZGER | To sleep, perchance to dream... | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:46 | 11 |
|
Not in my mind..betting means you're rooting for a team to score some
meaningless points at the end of the game so that you can win some cash.
Stating something means that you have an emotional investment instead of
financial and you be happier if the bills put forth a good effort and keep the
game close and aren;t worried about meaningless points scored in the final
minute...
Metz
|
9.1474 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:46 | 11 |
| <<< Note 9.1460 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>> The 'Boys think that they just have to show up. Buffalo is coming
>> to play.
Tommy, you should've added a big IMO after those statements! To the
contrary, JJ will have this bunch wired by game time. Mark my words.
- Rope
|
9.1475 | Ba-doom!@@ | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:48 | 6 |
| Tommy,
How much money did ya lay on the Celtics to win the NBA title.
I wanna get in on this action...
MikeL
|
9.1476 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:52 | 4 |
| >> If you keep the ball away from the Dallas offense they won't score.
They didn't have any problem getting around that last year. The
way to get around it is for your defense to score. :-)
|
9.1477 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:54 | 5 |
| see comment about turnovers.
HtH
The Crazy Met
|
9.1479 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:55 | 7 |
| >
> Suppose we all sprout antlers and start rooting around in the snow for
> food.
>
huh-huh, huh-huh-huh, that would be COOL.....
|
9.1478 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:56 | 6 |
| worst scenario:
Dallas wins and Kosarends up playing a big part in it. Besides eating Crow,
we get to hear from all the Dallas fans and Hal!
The Crazy Met
|
9.1480 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Thu Jan 27 1994 15:57 | 1 |
| Only the MOOSE can do that effectively
|
9.1481 | Got nothing to say really | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:00 | 13 |
| Well it's 2 days to go and a faraway fan like myself is usually
psyching myself up for SBS but I can't seem to get up for it. I think
of the Bills players & feel they must be the same. Hope they stuff
Emmitt up Aikman's ass & they both get carried off. Can't stand all
the 'greatest (insert player position) ever to pull on a jersey.'
Better be entertaining or i'll have to stop despising the Bills &
feel sorry for them instead..........NOT !
Now if only the Bills players were as masculine as British football
players :^)
Davie.
|
9.1482 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:14 | 11 |
| Davie,
Even a nearby fan like myself can't get up for it either. I'm py
for all the Dallas and Buffalo fans, but to me it's "same old same old".
I'll watch the game and do what I do a lot of times in games where I
don't have a big interest -- I'll pick a position and watch it for a
few plays. That's kind of fun, especially the interior linemen....
'Saw
|
9.1483 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:26 | 5 |
| 'Saw is just experiencing the clinical depression brought on amongst
Giant fans who consider the Cowboys to be their biggest rival, coupled
with the anxiety of a New-Yorker wannabe seeing a real New York team
(as opposed to one those faux NY teams from Jersey) making it to the
big dance.
|
9.1484 | yawn | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:30 | 2 |
| Nah, I agree, this one is nothing to get too hot about. It's gottne to the point
that I almost expect Supe blow outs...
|
9.1485 | Brewers droop- Nah; Superbowl droop. | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:46 | 11 |
| On the subject of fans:
I don't accuse Cowboy fans of jumping the
bandwagon but can't fail to see that during JJ's early days he was
considered to be a bit of a tit. Now he's a genious. How's that ???
Secondly, during those times the NFL notes file on the 'boys had
about 11 entries in total. After they post a SB win there's over
500? notes. My dictionary must have another meaning for 'fan'. I don't
post many notes in the Dolphin file 'cause no-one gives a toss (sniff!)
The Cowboy fan factor is making me dislike a good football team.
Davie the whiner.
|
9.1486 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:50 | 19 |
| No, I'm not bummed that the Giants are not there. I really didn't
expect them to be there.
I'm just not super up for the game, because neither of the teams
is a team I really like.
It wouldn't matter to me if it were Dallas Houston, or Dallas KC
or San Fran Buffalo... I'm just not heavily hanging on every
word coming out of Atlanta or really paying all that much
attention.
I enjoyed the season, I enjoyed most of the playoffs and I'll
watch the Super Bowl (and probably the left tackle most of the
day).
Baseball starts soon!
'Saw
|
9.1487 | SI Jinx - I hope | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:53 | 7 |
|
Emmet Smith is on the SI cover. Here is hoping that the SI jinx strikes
again.
fwiw Zimmerman predicts 24-17 Dallas.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1488 | they were saying the same stuff 3 weeks ago | FRETZ::HEISER | my kid beat up your honor student | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:57 | 2 |
| This has all the makings of a big upset or highly competitive contest.
Just look at this year's Orange Bowl.
|
9.1489 | This from a 9 straight afl picker | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:06 | 13 |
| Well, I'm going out on a limb and picking the Bills outright. At
first, I thought it was hopeless simply because of the quality of the
'boys play Sunday.
But, with previous victory at Dallas and short week, health of bills
and overconfidence of Dallas I'm getting more and more confidence in
bills. I'm looking for bills to go out with 2 td lead and cowboys to
make a late run and game to be decided by fg.
curious to see what London spread is as well as Ontario Lottery line
is.
billte
|
9.1490 | Buffalo 38 Dallas 35 | FRETZ::HEISER | my kid beat up your honor student | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:06 | 1 |
|
|
9.1491 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:08 | 5 |
| Agree on the FG spread. But, 38-35? Dallas offense will have the ball
too many times. Bills need to use a grind it out offense and use up the
clock. 27-24 Bills
The Crazy Met
|
9.1492 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:29 | 7 |
| � I don't accuse Cowboy fans of jumping the
� bandwagon but can't fail to see that during JJ's early days he was
� considered to be a bit of a tit. Now he's a genious. How's that ???
Success will do that. One of JJ's biggest problems was he was filling
the shoes of a living legend -- Tom Landry. I was living in Texas when
Landry was canned. Lynch mobs were forming all over the state.
|
9.1493 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:35 | 3 |
| � This has all the makings of a big upset or highly competitive contest.
ACChris help you in coming up with that prediction?
|
9.1494 | My daughter's 1st grade teacher's in the halftime show! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jan 28 1994 11:12 | 11 |
| > This has all the makings of a big upset or highly competitive
> contest.
No, this has all the makings of yet another extremely dull and
one-sided game. If past Super Bowls have taught us anything it's that
teams that have lost Super Bowl games tend to continue to lose Super
Bowl games. More recent history also shows a clear NFC dominance, and
quite frankly I see no evidence to prove that trend is reversing.
- ACC Chris
|
9.1495 | I got spare cash to invest - if the odds are right! ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:20 | 9 |
|
Yabbut does anybody have the odds that the announcers will use the
word "Outstanding" more than 20 times in the first quarter? That's
where the real action's gonna be!
I remain,
carnac_for_Kev
|
9.1496 | They're also the team people love to hate | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:24 | 13 |
| >> <<< Note 9.1485 by KIRKTN::DWALLACE "The Lure 'O the trout" >>>
>> -< Brewers droop- Nah; Superbowl droop. >-
>> Secondly, during those times the NFL notes file on the 'boys had
>> about 11 entries in total. After they post a SB win there's over
>> 500? notes. My dictionary must have another meaning for 'fan'. I don't
Davie,
I agree with some of what you say, but not every note in the Cowboys
topic is entered by a fan.
Jerry
|
9.1497 | man those super superalives | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:31 | 6 |
| Kev,
Last year with Enbert and Trumpe (I hope I have that right) the
cliches were flying fast and furious. I think some producer had a
script for em to follow
Who is it this year announcing?
|
9.1498 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:34 | 2 |
|
Al, Dan and Frank, if I'm not mistaken....
|
9.1499 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:51 | 1 |
| I don't watch much AFC contests so who the hail are Dan and Frank?
|
9.1500 | Maybe he was hit in the chookies | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:59 | 9 |
| Jerry,
I know this but still thought i'd bitch about it a little :-)
I'd love to give you a description of how i think the game will go
but there doesn't seem to be any point this year somehow. I meant
to ask someone this; whilst watching my first SF game of the season
(SF v NYG) I realised that Rickey Watters was not only a loud mouth
pain in the arse but he was almost cross-eyed ! Any info.......
Davie
|
9.1501 | And Frank Gifford has me beat by a decade or two | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Fri Jan 28 1994 13:21 | 10 |
| .1499
I assume that is Frank Gifford and crew, Michaels and Dierdorf are
the others.
Not exactly Dandy Don and the (insert favorite adjective here)
Howard Cossell (I liked him in the 60s on radio then he became a
caricature of himself)
For me though this crew beats nbc and cbs crews (not being a fan of
madden at all)
|
9.1502 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Fri Jan 28 1994 14:09 | 1 |
| Frank G. doesn"t work for NBC he works for ABC.
|
9.1503 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 28 1994 14:12 | 4 |
| Last year was Madden and Sumerall.
This year is Enberg and ?? on NBC
The Crazy Met
|
9.1504 | NBC last year | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Fri Jan 28 1994 14:15 | 6 |
| NBC carried the Super Bowl last year. Who can forget an almost-in-tears
O.J. trying to interveiw Jim Kelly.
I'm not sure about it this year.
Jerry
|
9.1505 | NBC.....Again! | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Fri Jan 28 1994 14:16 | 2 |
| Oh No, not again! Probably Trumpe, Enberg.
Last year was also Trumpe, Enberg, not Madden and Summerall.
|
9.1506 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 28 1994 14:18 | 4 |
| Thats right. In the last TV contract the NFL gave out 3 of th4 SB's. NBC
then got the 4th one - some bidding process.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1507 | | FRETZ::HEISER | my kid beat up your honor student | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:01 | 1 |
| Anyone know the last SB underdog to beat the spread?
|
9.1508 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:06 | 2 |
| gotta be the '91 Bils (only one l back then)
dr.a
|
9.1509 | Giants-Bills? | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:07 | 5 |
| I would think whoever was the underdog in the Giants-Bills game.
I don't remember who was favored, but if it was the Giants, they
didn't cover.
Mike
|
9.1510 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:14 | 1 |
| I believe the Billls were favored but I don't remember how much
|
9.1511 | pas years | JURAN::WEST | | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:42 | 7 |
|
note 1509 Giants were 7 point underdog vs bills in 91...
in 89 Cincinnati were 6 point dogs vs San Fran and covered 20-16
how far shall we go back....I think before that all were blow out
to 82....where San Fran was a dog to Cinn and won outright.
|
9.1512 | | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:55 | 5 |
| I have inside info that says TCM is praying for a 35-9 Buffalo win.
(Or even a 29-25 Dallas win)
billl
|
9.1513 | same score, twice, haunt them forever | FRETZ::HEISER | my kid beat up your honor student | Fri Jan 28 1994 16:29 | 2 |
| I changed my mind on the last score. Dallas will lose this one the way
they lost their last one: 35-31.
|
9.1514 | cast in stone | FRETZ::HEISER | my kid beat up your honor student | Fri Jan 28 1994 16:33 | 1 |
| ...and Da 'Boys are on SI this week.
|
9.1515 | 'Da Boys | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Jan 28 1994 16:53 | 5 |
| Yuck,
I hate saying this, but Da Boys in a romp. 31-7.
Flying Zamboni
|
9.1516 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Fri Jan 28 1994 17:56 | 7 |
| They were on SI a few times last year.....didn't work.
This Dallas team has to practically give the game away(read
at least 5 turnovers) in order for the Billlls to win. This is
certainly possible since we saw 9 last year but I don't think this
senario will happen again this year. I look for this game to be simular
to when Washington whipped the billlls a couple years back.
|
9.1517 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sat Jan 29 1994 23:00 | 6 |
| billl,
yabbut, switch those scores in favor of Buffalo.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1518 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sun Jan 30 1994 21:59 | 7 |
| 30-13 Dallas win. Darn turnovers, and a few more yards on the final
drive to cover the spread :-(.
Great second half by Dallas.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1519 | is buffalo gonna make it 5 in a row next year??? | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Sun Jan 30 1994 22:17 | 6 |
| the turnovers by buffalo turned into 17 pts. for dallas which was the
difference in the score...but there was a turnover by dallas which
buffalo scored too... a team like dallas scares me because they are so
young. looks like another dynasty...
stig
|
9.1520 | Thurman sticks his head in the sand. | CADSYS::CAVE | | Sun Jan 30 1994 22:41 | 15 |
|
I have to comment on Thermal's poor performance and I'm not
talking about the fumbles. That 2nd fumble was huge and totally changed
the game. However, it was only a few minutes into the second half and
the game was TIED!!! So Thermal goes to the sidelines and puts his head in
the sand. That is totally unacceptable. He barely played after that due to
cramps? (more likely attitude). He should have sucked it up and tried to
make up for it. The Bill's were outplaying the Cowboys to that point and
Thermal had already conceeded. It has to hurt the team when your main
offensive weapon gives up even though the score it tied and there is
plenty of time left.
Alan
|
9.1521 | | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Mon Jan 31 1994 08:02 | 6 |
| I was wondering how many times Buffallllo was going to try that
little shovel pass play. I recall them doing it about 5 times,
with a net gain of about 1 yard. Duhhh!
billl (not a fan of the Billlls)
|
9.1522 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Mon Jan 31 1994 08:26 | 12 |
|
Yabbut the phone company's changed the area code for Bufallllo.
Oh four four
;^)
|
9.1523 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 31 1994 08:52 | 18 |
| I couldn't help but wonder, if the Bills hadn't have lost three previous
Super Bowls, if those turnovers would have hurt as much.
They were playing well in the first half, taking advantage of little
Dallas mistakes, and then in the second half, Thurmon fumbles and next
thing you know, they go to pieces.
How much of it could have been the "Oh no, here we go again" feeling?
First half was a good game, second half was pretty boring.
Oh, and btw, I thought that 90% of the ads were excellent, especially
the Wavy Lays one.....
'Saw
|
9.1524 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:01 | 9 |
| I know one thing, if I were coach of the Bills, Thermal would
be in my dog house. So, the guy goes out and fumbles. I can
live with that. But, then, he spends the rest of the game
sitting on the bench (more or less), holding his head, feeling
sorry for himself.
Gimme someone with less talent and more guts and I'd be happy.
Scott
|
9.1525 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:16 | 17 |
|
I think Levy saw how Thurman reacted after the second fumble.
He didn't agree with it and sat him down. Then the use the old
suffering from leg cramps routine. Give me a break, just say Thurman's
he the dog house and was benched.
Anyone else agree with me that Marv Levy and his entire staff
should be fired this morning? Buffalo might make it to a fifth straight
SB, but they are not going to win with Levy as the coach. That shuffle
pass play was useless all day, so they kept using it. The other play
I hate of Buffalo's is that delayed handoff to Thurman. Any idiot can
see it doesn't work against Dallas. Thurman is practically standing still
when he gets the ball and he has no momentum when he starts running.
So Dallas was stuffing it most of the day. Buffallllo should have
run more run plays with Thurman 5 yrds deep. Hand him the ball in a full
run and let him find the holes. It seems to work with Dallas and Emmitt.
Ron
|
9.1526 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:27 | 6 |
|
IMO the Woodstock Pepsi Ad was the best of the day........
BudBowl sucked as usual except for the Basher getting thrown out....
mikey
|
9.1527 | Marv Levy... da man's a jeenyus... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:29 | 20 |
|
> I was wondering how many times Buffallllo was going to try that
> little shovel pass play. I recall them doing it about 5 times,
> with a net gain of about 1 yard. Duhhh!
Through the drunkenness we spent much of the second-half trying to
devise still more innovative ways for Marv Levy to pick up one yard
with the highest complexity possible (hey, the game degraded so
quickly-- I thought that this time by making it to halftime we might
finally be home free, but Buffalo just postponed it a quarter).
Stuff like direct snap to the halfback, flea-flicker to Kelly, shovel
pass to the tackle eligible. The football was spending way too much
time in Buffalo's backfield, both on that shovel pass trap play and
the usual running plays out of the shotgun, where it looks like the
back has to run into the QB and change directions before he even gets
started upfield. At some point when you're getting your head kicked in
you do have to throw the ball upfield and risk the turnover...
glenn
|
9.1528 | And the Sabres also lost yestidday | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:32 | 13 |
| I agree that Buffallllo's coaching staff should be gonzo. Hell,
once Dallas adjusted (took 'em long enough) and stopped the
short pass, the billlls had no alternatives. Once the game
was tied at 13, the billlls went into panic mode and fell
apart. Thurnover comes up big in the Supe again.
MikeL
P.S.
What prize do ah get for correctly predictin the actual score(30-13)??
|
9.1529 | | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:37 | 7 |
| >> What prize do ah get for correctly predictin the actual score(30-13)??
You get to keep the one that you keep saying you are going to send me.
billl
|
9.1530 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:38 | 15 |
| Buffalo didn't go long often enough to open up the Dallas D. So the Dallas
D closed down.
I also think that when you are playing against speed like the Boys you have
to turn that into their disadvantage, but devising and running plays that
make them commit heavily to one action -- ie getting them to overrun the
play etc etc. Not easy, but it can be done.
I still wonder, if this were there first meeting, if it were Buffalos first
time in the Bowl, if they would have folded so quickly in the second
half. It's like they just said "oh well, here we go again".....
'Saw
|
9.1531 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:51 | 7 |
| Bufallo started losing it at the end of the first half. Driving with
the ball with a little time left and not throwing it to the end zone trying
for a TD. Instead they run the ball and kick a field goal. 17-6 looks
a lot different than 13-6. Then they get the ball to start the 2nd half and
who knows what could happen. bah humbug!
The Crazy Met
|
9.1532 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:56 | 9 |
| Nah billl,
I'll send you da one you deserved. Since I don't trust Decsnail
since losing mah first prize I sent ya, send me your home address
via mail(if you're inclined) or ah'll arrange to meet ya and
give it ya in person..
OK?
MikeL
|
9.1533 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Mon Jan 31 1994 09:57 | 3 |
| What do John Bobbit and the Bills have in common?
They both lost the last four.
|
9.1534 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Mon Jan 31 1994 11:35 | 25 |
| Thoughts on the game - I can't beleive I actually watched the whole thing:
o Put me on the Thermal is an a$$ bandwagon. He quit after his fumble.
If I were a Bill, particularly a defensive player, I would have puched
him in the face after the game. No excuse for that. I'd trade his a$$, I
don't care how good he is.
o Buffalo started strong on D. Their strength is their speed, but Dallas
likes to run tackle-to-tackle. To counteract this, they put enormous
pressure on the center of the Dallas o-line. They crowded two linemen
in the middle - virtually on the center, and relied on linebackers to
stop anything outside. Worked like a charm, so of course they got away from
it. Actully, Dallas adjusted well, and eventually wore the Buffalo D out.
o Football in a dome still sips.
o My favorite commercial was the one where Cindy Crawford was transformed to
Rodney Dangerfield, from a lack of Pepsi. Melanie liked the one were the
monkey was driving the car.
o Is there a female performer anywhere uglier than Winnona Judd?
more later
=Bob=
|
9.1535 | took the wind out of their sails | FRETZ::HEISER | little bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my pain | Mon Jan 31 1994 11:52 | 2 |
| The Bills looked liked they quit after the 2nd Thomas fumble. It was a
decent game up til then.
|
9.1536 | BUNCH OF GIVE-UPS - BILLS | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Mon Jan 31 1994 12:44 | 21 |
|
Thomas should be traded! Another Byner deal??? could be but I'd
let him go anyway.
Give Kelly some credit. It looked like he was the only one trying
to play the game with less than 2 minutes left. Poor guy must have
been hit over a dozen times. I'd almost think of letting the whole
offensive line go just for not trying!
Troy Aikman looked like crap. I would have pulled him after the
first half and put a real QB in there.
No way Bills can make it back next year!
Don't think the Boys will make it back next year either. I look
for a GB vs Browns SB next year.
WOOF!
|
9.1537 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 31 1994 12:52 | 46 |
| > Thomas should be traded! Another Byner deal??? could be but I'd
> let him go anyway.
For me, it's not so much that he fumbled twice, although you do have to
look at his abyssmal SB record, but that he caved and gave up immediately.
There is no glory is giving up. None whatsoever. I could have respected
him if he'd sucked it up and gone back out there to TRY. There is a
certain angst and a certain glory is perservering against all odds even
if you lose. But to just QUIT.....
> Give Kelly some credit. It looked like he was the only one trying
> to play the game with less than 2 minutes left. Poor guy must have
> been hit over a dozen times. I'd almost think of letting the whole
> offensive line go just for not trying!
I give Kelly a lot of credit. He never quit.
> Troy Aikman looked like crap. I would have pulled him after the
> first half and put a real QB in there.
Then it probably would have been Buffalo's first SB win.....8^)
> No way Bills can make it back next year!
That's what everyone said last year. But you might have a point.
If Houston hadn't taken the gas pipe (or make that Warren Moon taking the
gas pipe) against the Chiefs, who knows if Buffalo would have made it...
> Don't think the Boys will make it back next year either. I look
> for a GB vs Browns SB next year.
Dallas has plenty of talent, but it's like a new pitcher coming into the
league -- after a while folks develop ways to defend against you....
They stand a good chance, but they're not a lock.....
'Saw
|
9.1538 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 31 1994 12:56 | 7 |
| � Give Kelly some credit. It looked like he was the only one trying
� to play the game with less than 2 minutes left. Poor guy must have
� been hit over a dozen times.
It amazed me how effective that 4 man rush was for Dallas.
Theoretically Kelly should not be under that much pressure -- it's 6 or
7 on 4, but that Dallas 4...
|
9.1539 | | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Mon Jan 31 1994 12:56 | 6 |
| Did you happen to notice they put Bernie in to take the last
"kneel-down" of the game. He'll probably get some big bonus
for "taking a snap" in the SB.
billl
|
9.1540 | | DECWET::METZGER | To sleep, perchance to dream... | Mon Jan 31 1994 13:04 | 24 |
|
That's cause Troy already had his helmet off and was sporting the Champions
baseball cap. Plus he was probably trying to find the cameras to say I'm going
to Disneyworld to.
I didn;t get to see a whole lot of the game (chatting, trying to keep the kids
entertained in the middle of a party) but it was pretty obviuos that the Cowboy
offensive line was the dominant force in the 2nd half. They ran the play where
the left side pulls and emmitt follows them 5 times in a row at one point and
buffalo couldn't do anything to stop them....it was typical NFC East power
football.
I predicted 24-10 so I wasn't far off. I was amazed that buffalo couldn't
adjust to deeper routes after Dallas took away the short game. Emmitt is a
great back but a lot of other backs could be great running behind that
line.Nice moves by both Thomas and Smith and the touchdown runs.
Tommy must still be nursing his hangover :-)
Metz
|
9.1541 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 31 1994 13:10 | 5 |
| �I was amazed that buffalo couldn't
�adjust to deeper routes after Dallas took away the short game.
The times Buffalo did go deep, the Bills wideouts had the Dallas DB's
severely toasted, but Kelly overthrew them.
|
9.1542 | re. I'm going to Disney | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Mon Jan 31 1994 13:36 | 7 |
| I noticed that jimmie told Bill Clinton that he would be fishing for a
few days then jjones said "He's speaking for himself, I'd love to go to
the White House".
Though johnson wasn't actually declining a visit
|
9.1543 | | FRETZ::HEISER | little bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my pain | Mon Jan 31 1994 13:40 | 9 |
| I don't see how you can blame everything on Thomas. The game was still
*tied* after his 2nd miscue. The problem with the Bills is that they
let Thurman's Self-Pity Party affect the whole team. Levy should've
only sat him out 1 series and made him go back in there. Thurman's
biggest mistake was quitting when they still had a chance.
You have to guess that the Bills were carrying so much emotional
"SB-loser" baggage that they fell apart with 1 blunder. You would
think professionals would have more determination than that.
|
9.1544 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Jan 31 1994 14:34 | 9 |
| What a suck game. Beebe running out of bounds when he could have
reached the 1st down marker. He obviously didn't know the spread.
Wotta rat. They coulda covered.
It woulda served the Dallas fans (at the party I went to, anyway)
right, they were unbearable. I hate the Cowboys...
_GSH_
|
9.1545 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Mon Jan 31 1994 14:39 | 4 |
| >> I hate the Cowboys...
Why? When the niners were winning their fans were just as "unbearable",
same with the Steeler fans.
|
9.1546 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Mon Jan 31 1994 14:41 | 5 |
| I agree with .1544 there is just something about the Cowboys and the
America's Team crap thing that makes them particularly loathsome.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1547 | even after he tells them, they still don't know | FRETZ::HEISER | little bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my pain | Mon Jan 31 1994 14:46 | 4 |
| The Phoenix-equivalent of Mike & the Mad Dog just loves to rank on
Cowgirl fans, especially since he was on the air for a year in Big D.
His favorite thing to do is ask them all who their all-time leading
scorer is. It's amazing how few of them know.
|
9.1548 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Mon Jan 31 1994 14:50 | 4 |
| Actually it has to do more with winning than anything else. If they
were perennial losers nobody would give a @h%$ about America's team
crap. If it is just that label that bothers so many folks then that is
more a personal problem then anything else. I love it! :-)
|
9.1549 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 31 1994 14:55 | 21 |
| > Actually it has to do more with winning than anything else. If they
> were perennial losers nobody would give a @h%$ about America's team
> crap. If it is just that label that bothers so many folks then that is
> more a personal problem then anything else. I love it! :-)
No. I think it's the Bandwagon thing. It's like all the Cowboys
paraphernalia you see on folks who obviously don't know the first thing
about football.
That's part of it.
I've never know anyone who was ambivalent about the boys. They either
liked them (mainly because they won a lot) or else they hated them.
The true Cowboy fans still wore the stuff when they were having those
atrocious seasons late in the Landry years. Those are the folks I
respect, not the new faux fans....
'Saw
|
9.1550 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Mon Jan 31 1994 14:56 | 8 |
| > Actually it has to do more with winning than anything else
nope. Look at the 49'ers from 1981 through today. One heck of a run yet
folks do not have the kind of passionate dislike for them as they do for
the Cowboys. It is more than just winning. Probably has something to
do with the Cowboy fans being particularly obnoxious.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1551 | | FRETZ::HEISER | little bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my pain | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:11 | 3 |
| Bandwagoners are everywhere, but for some strange reason they seem to
flock to the Cowboys. Most Cowboy fans I know today were MIA or AWOL when
they were 1-15.
|
9.1552 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:15 | 6 |
| �I've never know anyone who was ambivalent about the boys.
You know me.
As for TCM and the rest of you -- you guys want a little cheese to go
with that w(h)ine?
|
9.1553 | Another hated Cowboy fan | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:18 | 26 |
|
Your darn right America's team crap. How many times does it have to be
stated that the DALLAS COWBOYS had nothing to do with creating that label. NFL
Properties, in their infinite wishdom placed that label on the team after it
outsold all other teams in sports items licensed by the NFL. Is it the Cowboys
fault that people like to buy items with the Cowboy name on it?
I don't doubt that many of you can't stand Cowboy fans. I've run into
several I can't stand my self. Some people can tend to go overboard when their
team happens to be kicking the tail of the rest of the league. As stated earlier
the fans of team that happen to be hot at the time tend to rub it in. I can
give you many examples from this notefile if necessary aka Browns/Steelers
,Raider/Broncos and many more.
I always tend to think what goes around comes around to haunt you like
going 1-15 etc. But what the heck you guy's are going to go on hating them , so
what the heck. Heres to a long and continuous hate and a threepeat to boot. Go
Buffalo make it five in a row!!!
Cheers!!!
Cadzilla2
|
9.1554 | 3 Straight in Miami | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:23 | 18 |
| >>nope. Look at the 49'ers from 1981 through today. One heck of a run yet
>>folks do not have the kind of passionate dislike for them as they do for
>>the Cowboys. It is more than just winning. Probably has something to
>>do with the Cowboy fans being particularly obnoxious.
Face it, it has more to do with Dallas winning and winning consistently
but for a 5 year period in the 80's. The Cowboys have a tradition of
winning that's been going on for nearly 30 years now. 7 Super Bowls, 4
Wins. They're cocky and know they are the best team in football right
now. If free agency doesn't dismantle this club, the sports world
better get used to the sight of Jones and Johnson accepting the
Lombardi award for the next few seasons. This team is young, hungry,
and scary.
DEAL WITH IT AMERICA: COWBOYS ARE CHAMPS!!!
- Rope
|
9.1555 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:33 | 3 |
| no it has more to do with notes like .1554 than almost anything else.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1556 | Who says dynasties have to be likable? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:38 | 38 |
|
WARNING-- the following is not an indictment of our true-blue in-house
Cowboys' fans, or anyone else who by any reasonable standard can be
considered a "real" fan:
I heard an interview with a reporter from Dallas a couple of weeks ago
and he claimed that even in the Cowboys' heyday in the 1970s it was
common knowledge that many of their fans in attendance just didn't have
much of an idea of what the hell was going on in the games. The "least
knowledgeable fans in all of football" was the specific term he used.
Basically at that time Texas Stadium was a playground for the oil-rich
and famous during the boom years in Texas, with the see-and-be-seen
philosophy firmly entrenched, and it showed. The fans just knew that
the 'Boys were kicking most of the league's butt, and even if they
didn't have much interest in the nuts and bolts of the game they too
projected that arrogance. Then when the team started to fall apart,
suddenly plenty of tickets became available to see this "greatest
franchise in football", to the point where the Cowboys were no longer
selling out their games, something you'd never see happen to teams
like the Steelers, Bears, Redskins, Eagles, Giants, etc.
Frankly, this was the very impression that I always drew of the Cowboys'
fans when I was at a more impressionable age. Obviously it didn't
speak for all of their millions of fans nationwide, but this flashiness
and extravagance was certainly what one saw on the tube every other
Sunday when the Cowboys were featured. That made them and their fans
hateable. Let's face it, the Cowboys themselves played up all of this
to the hilt. It was a hell of a marketing approach. TV can be a very
dangerous influence on our nation's youth... ;-)
In Jerry Jones the tradition lives on. I'll immediately gain respect
for Jimmy Johnson (and that takes some nose-holding) if he dumps this
pretentious SOB and leaves him high and dry without a coach. It
probably won't make much difference in the Cowboys' immediate fortunes,
but it'd be nice to see nonetheless.
glenn
|
9.1557 | AMERICA'S TEAM (does have a nice ring to it, no?) | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:44 | 20 |
| <<< Note 9.1555 by METSNY::francus "Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football" >>>
>> no it has more to do with notes like .1554 than almost anything else.
>> The Crazy Met
What? Celebrating a win? Cheering a team on? Being a bit rowdy
after your team (BTW, I was FAN during the 3-13, 1-15 years) wins
their 2nd WORLDS CHAMPIONSHIP???
GIMME A BREAK. Take it to the Whining Sore Losers Note. Alot of
people I'm sure started to like Dallas in the 70's because they were on
TV nearly every Sunday at 4:00 PM. They've got the sharpest uniforms
in the league and just look crisp. Add the fact that they win often
and you're going to have your share of people that jump on the
bandwagon. Nothing wrong with that. I'll dance with 'em even if they
weren't around 5 years ago.
- Rope
|
9.1558 | Tough to hate this bunch... | DECWET::METZGER | To sleep, perchance to dream... | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:54 | 19 |
|
I disliked the cowboys of the 70's and early 80's. I was exstatic when Joe
threw the pass to dwight Clark that knocked the boys out.
that being saaid...
I sort of like this group. Aikman and smith look like they are having alot of
fun. I know Irvin certainly is. The o-line just runs over people and the
players aren't afraid to speak out. The defense is a bunch of interchangeable
parts with nobody claiming to be the best player in football on it (Mr Bruce
Smith he of the 4 tackles yesterday) and everybody knows their role on the team.
The coach is funny and a great motivator and can take a joke and the players
love him.
The only boob is the owner....
Metz
|
9.1559 | | CSOA1::JACOB | Thurman Thomas=NFL's Barry Bonds!!! | Mon Jan 31 1994 16:00 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
9.1560 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 31 1994 16:42 | 3 |
| A New York Mets fan complaining about obnoxious fans. Being from New
York, I guess he knows obnoxiousness when he sees it. In my mind there
is noting more obnoxious than a Yankees/Mets/Giants fan.
|
9.1561 | different mindset Mac when you ARE the Capital of the World | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Mon Jan 31 1994 16:58 | 6 |
| When everyone roots against the NY teams their fans don't
take umberance at it, rather they GLORY in it. NY'ers have always believed
that the rest of the country wants to stick to 'em so they might as well
be obnoxious - makes no real difference.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1562 | typecast? | HBAHBA::HAAS | I Shun You, Version 3 for Windows | Mon Jan 31 1994 16:59 | 7 |
| > ... In my mind there
> is noting more obnoxious than a Yankees/Mets/Giants fan.
^^^^^^
A little moderator type freudian slip there, Mac?
TTom
|
9.1563 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 31 1994 17:15 | 2 |
| Ya caught me TTom, there are few noters more obnoxious than Chappy,
TCM, and Mike Childs ;^)
|
9.1564 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Mon Jan 31 1994 17:17 | 4 |
| But then we have to toss in one Pittsburgh fan and one Boston fan into
the mix. And that doesn't even include our esteemed MtM.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1565 | From the West Coast... | GWEN::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Mon Jan 31 1994 17:27 | 5 |
| Not reading through all these... nice call Mike...
> <<< Note 9.1438 by CTHQ::LEARY "Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions" >>>
> -< Dallas 30 Buffalo 13 >-
|
9.1566 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Strawberry Fields Forever | Mon Jan 31 1994 17:31 | 25 |
| More game analysis.
How 'bout that "roughing?" the kicker call that went against Dallas in
the 2nd quarter that gave Buffalo the first down! That was so lame it
was pathetic. The Dallas defender barely touched the guys leg (rolled
into it) and the punter went down in a heap. That surprised me that
the officials were that nit-picky in such a big game.
Bruce Smith stated that if Dallas went one-on-one with him that it
would be a long day for Dallas. You have to give him credit, he got
the long day part correct - wrong team however. Smith was a non-factor
being held to 4 tackles, 1 assist, and no sacks. To his credit, he
helped cause the 2nd quarter INT by grabbing Aikman's shoulder as he
was throwing the ball.
Bennet had an excellent day for the Bills. Jeff Wright on DL also
played great.
For Dallas you have to give credit to the entire defense. They all
looked sharp. I was concerned in the 1st half at the lack of pressure
they were getting on Kelly. In the 2nd half, they made an adjustment
and decided to take away the underneath stuff. Buffalo never
countered.
- Rope
|
9.1567 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Mon Jan 31 1994 17:46 | 12 |
| I had this brilliant idea that I should find someone to take Dallas +10
and GIVE ME 10:1 odds. Thought that sounded good for awhile. Glad I
stayed totally financially independent of this game.
Was it confirmed that Thomas just quit or was he benched just so Levy
and the boys would have a chance without too many giveaways?
Dallas is more rootable than the old Landry teams; very professional
outfit. Can't compliment a team any more than comare em to 60s
Celtics.
Bill
|
9.1568 | | FRETZ::HEISER | little bit of compassion isn't enough to heal my pain | Mon Jan 31 1994 17:51 | 9 |
| > and decided to take away the underneath stuff. Buffalo never
> countered.
The last sentence speaks volumes. They didn't respond when Dallas tied
the game, they started playing not to lose. They didn't respond to
Dallas' adjustments. They didn't even stick with much of what was
successful in the first half. Shuttle pass? gimme a break. It was
like, "We're gonna use this until it works!" that's for practice, not
the Super Bowl.
|
9.1570 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Thurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!! | Mon Jan 31 1994 19:55 | 9 |
|
>> In my mind there
>>is noting more obnoxious than a Yankees/Mets/Giants fan.
Only thing I cain think of that's MORE obnoxious is dem Rugby
fans/players!!!
JaKe
|
9.1571 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Thurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!! | Mon Jan 31 1994 21:31 | 7 |
| what's the similarity between the Buffalo Bills and hashish?????
Both get smoked in a Bowl!!!!
JaKe
|
9.1572 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Thurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!! | Tue Feb 01 1994 00:06 | 8 |
| BILLS:==Boy I Love Losing Super_Bowls
- - - - -
Schnorttt Schittt Schleppps
JaKe
|
9.1573 | Everybody's a winner now... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Tue Feb 01 1994 00:54 | 5 |
| The Cowboys will have to dismantlewith free agency knocking at there
door. There won't be dynasty's like there used to be. What is Dallas'
cap at now???Way over I would imagine.
stig
|
9.1574 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Feb 01 1994 08:35 | 35 |
| Regarding the roughing the kicker call: it was a correct call.
It certainly appeared to me that, while not a big hit, there was
enough of an impact that it would have caused the kicker to lose
his balance. It wasn't a bad call by the officials.
Regarding Bruce Smith: remember that he had to come out of the
game for about 2 series early in the second half. At that point,
the Dallas offense moved completely away from his side of the field
in the second half. The way they dominated was to RUN, away from
Smith, after a cut block on Cornelius Bennett. Smart strategy,
excellent halftime adjustment, but in my mind wasn't something you
can complain about Bruce Smith. It's like saying Deion only had
1-2 passes per game defended. Well, most teams just don't throw
in that direction. In the first half, when Dallas directed more
of their attack in that direction, Smith had good success against
Tuinei.
Regarding the shuffle pass: it certainly didn't gain any yardage,
but was helpful, especially in the first half. Remember that a lot
of Dallas' advantage comes from its team speed. This is a play
very similar to a screen pass to keep the Dallas defensive line
honest. It was obvious that the screen was even less effective vs.
the Cowboys line than this play was. Moreover, Kelly was 13-16 in
the first half, as I recall, and (I believe) this play may have been
a factor in keeping a big pass russ off him.
Having said all that, I think Dallas won because they have a much
bigger offensive line that wears down and punishes opposing defenses;
because the Buffalo secondary is too slow too cover when the LB's
are forced to blitz situations; and because the Dallas defense is
just too fast for most teams. The type of offense that will beat
Dallas is one like the Giants in the late 80's or the Raiders of the
late 70's -- grind out the yardage in small chunks with a big line
and hard hitting, up-the-middle type running backs. Dallas' defense
could be worn down by this type of offense (IMO).
|
9.1575 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Tue Feb 01 1994 08:43 | 8 |
|
Dallas was under what the cap was being proposed to be before signing
Aikman, now I'm not sure. I thought that their payroll was around 27 million
and the cap was expected to be 31 or 32 million. Now they say the cap maybe
higher. Remeber most of these guys are young so they really don't have any
big time contracts other than Aikman, Smith and probably Haley....
mikey
|
9.1576 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 01 1994 08:48 | 16 |
| > is noting more obnoxious than a Yankees/Mets/Giants fan.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This clearly shows a lack of general knowledge about fans of New York
teams.
I think TCM would back me up when I say that these are quite different
species, and to lump them all together would be like saying that
all Dogder, Giants and Yankees fans were the same, back in the days
when NY city had three baseball teams. NY fans would definitely
take umbrage at that.....
'Saw
|
9.1577 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 01 1994 09:21 | 15 |
|
> I think TCM would back me up when I say that these are quite different
> species, and to lump them all together would be like saying that
> all Dogder, Giants and Yankees fans were the same, back in the days
> when NY city had three baseball teams. NY fans would definitely
> take umbrage at that.....
Yes, believe it or not, I think that when they're winning (which
thankfully has been less often than not), the Mets/Jets breed tends
to be more obnoxious than the Yanks/Giants. Possibly because they're
still upstarts, in need of constant attention when those teams do
something right... ;-)
glenn
|
9.1578 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 01 1994 09:29 | 22 |
| > Yes, believe it or not, I think that when they're winning (which
> thankfully has been less often than not), the Mets/Jets breed tends
> to be more obnoxious than the Yanks/Giants. Possibly because they're
> still upstarts, in need of constant attention when those teams do
> something right... ;-)
Well, yeah, that's kind of the way I've felt.
Plus, what I've noticed is that, obviously, in this area, there are
a lot of fans who root for the Red Sox in Baseball, and the NY Giants
in football. Those folks don't tend to be too obnoxious at all, because
of the dual nature of their fandom.
It always has seemed to me that most Giants fans from the NY area are
also Yankee fans, whereas Jets fans tend to be Mets fans, but I could
be wrong....
Just an observation though.....
'Saw
|
9.1579 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Tue Feb 01 1994 11:10 | 7 |
| Back to the NFL. 4 of 5 of the Cowboys O-line are free agents. Cap will
probably be around 34 mil. Dallas will probably have a hard time signing
all of them; under the NFL cap a team cannot spend anything they want to
resign their own players. Also Michael Irvin has one year left on his contract
and he wants mucho bucks.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1580 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Tue Feb 01 1994 11:17 | 3 |
| Tommy watch Day 2. I don't remember him mentioning any vacation.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1581 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Most Objective Analyst(tm) | Tue Feb 01 1994 11:43 | 2 |
| What's even funnier is that Hal and Tommy are never out at the same
time.
|
9.1582 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 01 1994 11:45 | 7 |
| > What's even funnier is that Hal and Tommy are never out at the same
> time.
Yabbut, I've met both Hal and Tommy, and if they're the same person, you'd
better believe it'd be worth a Lifetime Achievement Academy Award for Makeup
if they were really the same person......
|
9.1583 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 01 1994 11:54 | 6 |
| �it was typical NFC East power
�football.
No, it was typical Cowboy power football. If it was typical NFC East
power football the Cowboys would have been at home watching the game on
TV like the rest of the NFC East.
|
9.1584 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 01 1994 11:58 | 5 |
| � Dallas was under what the cap was being proposed to be before signing
� Aikman, now I'm not sure.
You can call Johnson alot of things, but you can't call him a dummy.
He knew the cap was coming.
|
9.1585 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 01 1994 12:06 | 5 |
| �Plus, what I've noticed is that, obviously, in this area, there are
�a lot of fans who root for the Red Sox in Baseball, and the NY Giants
�in football. Those folks don't tend to be too obnoxious at all,
I'm not surprised you think that oh fan of the Red Sox and NY Giants...
|
9.1586 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Most Objective Analyst(tm) | Tue Feb 01 1994 12:22 | 2 |
| Well 'Saw, Eddie Murphy pulled it off in one of his movies ("Coming to
America", I think).
|
9.1587 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 01 1994 12:50 | 10 |
|
> Dallas will probably have a hard time signing
> all of them; under the NFL cap a team cannot spend anything they want to
> resign their own players. Also Michael Irvin has one year left on his contract
> and he wants mucho bucks.
I thought Michael Irvin also signed a big contract earlier this year?
glenn
|
9.1588 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Tue Feb 01 1994 12:53 | 3 |
| nope, Irvin finished the second year in a 3 year deal.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1589 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 01 1994 13:04 | 6 |
| >
> Well 'Saw, Eddie Murphy pulled it off in one of his movies ("Coming to
> America", I think).
>
Good point there Mike. I remember that now.....
|
9.1590 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Can't Buy Me Love | Tue Feb 01 1994 13:06 | 9 |
| Both Jones and Johnson believe they can sign everyone and still be
under the cap. I believe as a team they are around 31 million right
now. The new cap is expected to be around 38-39 million I believe.
Johnson was also quoted in todays paper as saying Dallas would
concentrate on proven free agents more so than the draft this year.
His thinking was that a rookie wasn't going to do much for this team at
this juncture.
- Rope
|
9.1591 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 01 1994 13:07 | 27 |
| >�it was typical NFC East power
>�football.
>
> No, it was typical Cowboy power football. If it was typical NFC East
> power football the Cowboys would have been at home watching the game on
> TV like the rest of the NFC East.
A Patriots fan talking power football.... That's really rich.
Take a look at the winners of the Super Bowl six of the last 8 years,
and tell me that the NFC East has not represented power football.
We know you've got a woodie because the Redskins and the Eagles had
poor years, but the NFC East still players power football. The Cowboys,
excepting the fact that they have a tremendous deep threat in the WR corps,
play the same power game that the Redskins and Giants have played for
years.....
They've just taken it to the next level by adding the deep threat and
having a running back who has to have a personal Star Trek transporter -- why
else would so many folks be tackling thin air?
'Saw
|
9.1592 | not too much... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Wed Feb 02 1994 00:01 | 3 |
| the salary cap i believe is 34mil...
stig
|
9.1593 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 09:32 | 10 |
| The Pro Bowl is turning into the No Show Bowl.
A couple of the Bills and a few of the Cowboys backed out. Phil Simms
backed out yesterday, as it looks like he's going to need some shoulder
surgery.
Rodney Hampton was added to replace Emmitt Smith.
'Saw
|
9.1594 | They're expressing political feelings and fears! ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Feb 02 1994 09:49 | 16 |
|
Yabbut it's all because of those girly-mon's are skeered just
because there was a little rock 'n roll in Hawaii yesterday!
They're also boycotting because Hawaii's state song is by Carly
Simon , "I feel the earth move under my feet" and it discriminates
against the pedantilly_challenged! (is that the right word?)
Apparently, the student body @UMass Amherst is coordinating
the boycott!
I remain,
wondering how the surf's performing there
Kev
|
9.1595 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 09:52 | 8 |
| re .-1:
Need I make a stronger case for the need to be ever
vigilant for Space Aliens taking over regular people?
8^)
|
9.1596 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 02 1994 10:08 | 1 |
| Who ever said Kev was regular people?
|
9.1597 | Is Kev related to Princess Numa? 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Feb 02 1994 10:13 | 1 |
|
|
9.1598 | When are we going? REAL SOON!! | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Wed Feb 02 1994 10:43 | 10 |
|
My desk calandar says that on Feb 1 1968, Vince Lombardi resigned
as Coach of the Packers.
I was far too young to have followed the story ;-)
so could somebody fill me in?
Why?
Did he go directly to the 'Skins?
Who took over the Pack? D.Devine or someone else?
dr.a
|
9.1599 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:07 | 35 |
| > -< When are we going? REAL SOON!! >-
Classic stuff....
John Gant fell on his head. He's dead.
>so could somebody fill me in?
I'll try.
>Why?
Not positive, but my guess was that he figured that the talent at Green
Bay was aging, he probably also felt that he had done what he set out to
accomplish, and that new challenges awaited elsewhere.
>Did he go directly to the 'Skins?
Sort of. If memory serves me correct he "retired", then went to the
Skins, but I believe it was the next season. He died sometime in 1970.
>Who took over the Pack? D.Devine or someone else?
I believe it was Dan Devine, yes.
Sorry if it is sketchy, but it's been a while and my NFL Encyclopedia is
at home....
'Saw
|
9.1600 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:14 | 8 |
|
> Who took over the Pack? D.Devine or someone else?
Actually I think it was Phil "I knew Lloyd and you're no Lloyd"
Bengsten..
glenn
|
9.1601 | anyone have the list of free agents? | FRETZ::HEISER | gimme a dollar or gimme 50 cents | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:15 | 1 |
|
|
9.1602 | Tommy watch | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:19 | 3 |
| Day 3.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1603 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:30 | 14 |
| >> Who took over the Pack? D.Devine or someone else?
>
> Actually I think it was Phil "I knew Lloyd and you're no Lloyd"
> Bengsten..
Bingo. Yes, you are CORRECT sir.....
It was Bengsten for a few years and then Devine I believe....
I'd have to look stuff up at home to be sure.....
'Saw
|
9.1605 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:51 | 3 |
| yabbut, the Bills didn't lose until Sunday.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1606 | But it was Mazur who almost got cooked by the mike | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Wed Feb 02 1994 12:19 | 5 |
| Glenn that makes two today for you, did the mirth muse visit you?
The Bengtsen also coached our Pat's nestcepas?
|
9.1608 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Wed Feb 02 1994 13:33 | 7 |
| wooooaaa there.
> I realize that it is exceedlingly rare that I am ever wrong about
hahahahahhahahahaha
The Crazy Met
|
9.1609 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Wed Feb 02 1994 16:04 | 17 |
|
>> They're also boycotting because Hawaii's state song is by Carly
>>Simon , "I feel the earth move under my feet" and it discriminates
Twas Carole King, not Carly Simon who did that song.
Re Pro Bowl--who cares about it anyways, it's only a way fer football
haids to slide into withdrawal fer the rest of winter and the spring.
The possibility of getting hurt and missing time becuase of the pro
bowl is higher than any other sport. Unless yer talking Pete Rose
slamming into home. Even Hokey uses no checking during their all-star
game. What, maybe they should make the pro bowl 2 hand touch, played
on the beach, to avoid any possibility of major injury.
JaKe
|
9.1610 | Lombardi Stuff | STRATA::BARBIERI | God can be so appreciated! | Thu Feb 03 1994 08:53 | 24 |
| Yes, it was Phil Benston who was the defensive coordinator.
Lombardi moved up to the front office. He remained in Green
Bay that year and then went on to coach the Redskins. Having
come from New York, he did like the east coast. Also, his
wife Marie really wanted to go back east.
I believe Lombardi led Washington to a 7-6-1 record or maybe
7-5-2 and thus held onto never having coached a losing season.
He had cancer just before the start of the next season and that
was that.
Jerry Kramer wrote a book on Lombardi (after his death) and one
thing that really struck me was how denied the Redskins players
felt. They had just wished they could have had Lombardi for
many more years as the Packers had. Sonny Jurgensen for example,
really took losing Lombardi hard. He finally felt he had the
chance to play for a championship caliber team.
I'm not sure how long Bengston lasted, but Devine came after,
followed by Bart Starr, Forrest Gregg, Lindy Infante, and now
Mike Holmgrem.
Tony
|
9.1611 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 03 1994 08:56 | 12 |
| One thing that is impressive about Lombardi, at least from my point
of view, is how the tenets that he coached applied so well to life.
All but one of the championship Packers have gone on to become
VERY successful in later life....
If you ever want to read an inspirational book, with some good rules
to live by, pick up _Run_To_Daylight_ and give it a read....
'Saw
|
9.1612 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Thu Feb 03 1994 09:37 | 11 |
| I remember a story about Lombardi told by Sonny Jerguson. It recounted
an incident that occurred while Lombardi was coaching Washington.
I some game, Jerguson threw an interception. The interceptor had
a clear shot to the goal line with the exception of Sonny. Sonny,
who was never known for his mobility, ran him down and prevented the
touchdown. When asked about it later, he said something to the effect
that "The other guy was just running for a touchdown, I was running
for my life."
Jerry
|
9.1613 | Bills were robbed! | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Fri Feb 04 1994 11:49 | 4 |
| A controversy has surfaced over Buffalo's final series in the SB.
Those that have reviewed the tapes say the Bills didn't get a 3rd down.
While it wouldn't change the game, gamblers that picked the Bills to
cover are irate.
|
9.1614 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Feb 04 1994 11:54 | 15 |
| > A controversy has surfaced over Buffalo's final series in the SB.
> Those that have reviewed the tapes say the Bills didn't get a 3rd down.
> While it wouldn't change the game, gamblers that picked the Bills to
> cover are irate.
That might explain why Beebe ran out of bounds. If he thought it was
second down, he wanted to stop the clock.
I wasn't watching closely, but I do remember it seemed out of character
for Beebe to do something like that on 3rd down -- he's usually a heads-up
player....
'Saw
|
9.1615 | I'm officially retracting my Crow cuz I said they would cover | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Fri Feb 04 1994 12:02 | 1 |
|
|
9.1616 | | 18889::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Fri Feb 04 1994 13:00 | 5 |
| Jim Kelly spiked the ball on third down. It wasn't on the tapes
because NBC was showing Jimmy Johnson's hair winning the Gatorade
battle.
Mike
|
9.1617 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Feb 04 1994 13:14 | 5 |
| > Jim Kelly spiked the ball on third down. It wasn't on the tapes
> because NBC was showing Jimmy Johnson's hair winning the Gatorade
> battle.
OH.......
|
9.1618 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Feb 04 1994 16:11 | 10 |
|
>>for Beebe to do something like that on 3rd down -- he's usually a heads-up
>>player....
I remember his "heads up" play in the Monday night game .vs. the
STEELERS, when Gary Brown whacked him into another astral plane fer a
while. Loved that hit!!!
JaKe
|
9.1619 | Where's SnideAir? | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:37 | 6 |
| Heard a snipet on ESPN this AM that the Jacksonville Jags are
talking with Lou Holtz about the haid coaching job..
Anyone hear anymore?
MikeL
|
9.1620 | Now appearing for Snide...the other Mike | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Thu Feb 17 1994 12:55 | 5 |
|
I heard the same rumor.....Wouldn't be surprised to see ole Lou jump
ship again. Again when the heat of investigation looming....
mike
|
9.1621 | There was a UPI article | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:09 | 8 |
| I just read a UPI article that said the Jags were considering Holtz.
Holtz was unavailable for comment.
Didn't Holtz coach the Jets for a year or so, and absolutely flop?
Seems like he didn't like coaching the pros nearly as much as he
likes college.
Jerry
|
9.1623 | couldn't happen to a better program | FRETZ::HEISER | ask me about my vow of silence | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:29 | 1 |
| Yeah Holtz seems to leave when he hears the footsteps coming.
|
9.1624 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:49 | 13 |
| What investigation?
There's none planned that I know of.. All the merde in the book has
died a just death. If there was anything going on, we'd have heard
about it. Holtz' contract is up after '95 so who knows what his
immediate plans are.
Holtz coached the Jests in '76. That's a long time ago and maybe he
changed his mind.
MikeL
|
9.1625 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | TonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkank | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:07 | 7 |
| Holtz has a hard enough time winning with what is without a doubt,
year after year, the most talent laden squad in division IA football. Put
him in the NFL where the balance of talent is more equitable and he will
not last a full season. HUGE mistake by Jacksonville if they hire this
charlatan.
/Don
|
9.1626 | And Holtz may not be NFL haidcoach material | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:21 | 8 |
| HAHAHAHAHA with the stock anti retort.
How come Michigan and FSU had overall, the top rated talent-laden
classes over the last 15 years?
One team has no banners, the other got a late XMas gift...
MikeL
|
9.1627 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:51 | 5 |
|
the book has only been pushed aside cause it's good ole ND...the flagship
of all that's supposedly good with the NCAA......
mike
|
9.1628 | Holtz happy in South Bend | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 18 1994 14:19 | 62 |
|
[email protected] articles by Thu, 17 Feb 94:
--------
Subject: Holtz: I'm Happy With Irish
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 94 17:21:05 PST
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) -- The NFL expansion Jacksonville Jaguars, who
reportedly caught the interest of Dallas Cowboys coach Jimmy
Johnson several weeks ago, lost another possible candidate Thursday
when Notre Dame's Lou Holtz squelched a Florida newspaper story.
``I spoke with Lou Holtz this afternoon, and he indicated to me
he's very happy in his role as head coach at Notre Dame,'' athletic
director Dick Rosenthal said. ``He fully intends to continue
coaching here for years to come.''
The Florida Times-Union, citing unidentified team sources, said
Jaguars president David Seldin flew to White Plains, N.Y., on
Wednesday to meet with Holtz, who has been traveling for several
weeks.
The Times-Union last week said the Jaguars met with Johnson in
Miami, but Jaguars owner Wayne Weaver denied a meeting took place.
``We've had absolutely no contact with Jimmy Johnson --
personally, by phone or by contacts,'' Weaver said. ``There is no
validity to any of it.''
Dallas owner Jerry Jones said the Jaguars could be severely
penalized if they try to hire Johnson, who led Dallas to two
straight Super Bowl championships and has five years left on his
contract.
After the Cowboys' Super Bowl victory over Buffalo, Johnson said
he was asked by reporters about taking the Jacksonville job, ``and
what I said instead of the standard line was that anytime you have
a job, you're willing to listen to other opportunities.''
Despite the rumors, he said, ``I don't have any thoughts right
now that I'll be anywhere else.''
Meanwhile, former Washington Redskins coach Joe Gibbs told the
Times-Union he would like to meet with the Jaguars when his
contract status is made clear. He left the Redskins in 1992 but his
contract expires next February.
``As soon as the league gets this contract worked out, then I'd
like to talk,'' said Gibbs, a NASCAR owner, who was at the Daytona
International Speedway on Wednesday.
Gibbs has expressed interest in both the Jaguars and the
Carolina Panthers. Both teams have sought clarification on Gibbs'
availability.
Holtz's son, Skip, a former Irish assistant who was named head
coach at the University of Connecticut in December, said he had not
seen his father in about two weeks and had heard nothing about the
Jacksonville rumor.
``I wish I knew something about it,'' the younger Holtz said.
``I was doing a speech this morning and came into my office and had
six messages from the media.''
Holtz, who coached the New York Jets in 1976, came to Notre Dame
from the University of Minnesota a decade later but was said to be
returning to the NFL in 1991 when Jerry Burns left the Vikings.
Holtz then signed a five-year contract that squelched those rumors
and said unequivocally that he intended to remain at Notre Dame as
long as the school wanted him.
His contract with the Irish runs through the 1995 season.
``I love Notre Dame,'' Holtz said in 1991. ``I want to finish
out my coaching career here, whether that's a year or two years or
five years. I don't plan on coaching anyplace else -- and you can
put that sucker in granite.''
|
9.1629 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I lift, you grab. ... | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:47 | 12 |
| Ha Ha Ha...Just heard a report that Bubby Brister is shooting off his
mouth, in New Orleans this time. Says money is not the issue and will
work for $500k less than the average of what starting QB's get
nowadays, as long as he starts in NO. Says he can outthrow all three
of the present N.O. qb's, Wade Wilson, Steve Walsh, and Mike Buck.
Maybe he cain outthrow them, but he cain't outthink them, the guy has a
pea fer a brain.
Brister, a Starting Qb, hell, he ain't nothing but a backup qb at best.
JaKe
|
9.1630 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Fri Mar 04 1994 09:26 | 9 |
| The Philadelphia Eagles are reportedly being sold by Norman Braman. The
buyer is reported to be Jeffrey Lurie (sp), who is a movie producer.
The price is reported to be $196 million.
Unless the new owner cleans house in the front office, it won't really
matter who owns the team, esp. with the salary cap in place.
Dennis Faust
|
9.1631 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | Buffalo's new area code = 044 | Fri Mar 04 1994 11:06 | 7 |
|
It might help some just to sell the team, Dennis. Braman has such a
bad rep around the league (must be some sort of Philly pwners thing),
that in this new FA era, players seem to just want out of the Eagles.
A new owner might change things around.
brews
|
9.1632 | | FRETZ::HEISER | the rock cries out! | Fri Mar 04 1994 12:11 | 2 |
| With Barkley and Buddy here, and now others soon to follow, lots of
Philly fans are now Phoenix fans.
|
9.1634 | | FRETZ::HEISER | the rock cries out! | Fri Mar 04 1994 12:40 | 5 |
| > Says who? Eagles fans are Eagles fans and Sixers fans are Sixers
Says all the majority of the Philadelphia media, that's who. Not to
mention all the Philly transplants out here that are coming out of the
woodwork to change allegiances.
|
9.1635 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Mar 04 1994 12:57 | 3 |
| MikeH finally has company??? :-)
The Crazy Met
|
9.1636 | that's rich | FRETZ::HEISER | the rock cries out! | Fri Mar 04 1994 13:03 | 2 |
| Yeah look who's talking about company. The one that had to feed his
dog filet mignon so it would play with him.
|
9.1637 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Mar 04 1994 13:05 | 4 |
| I'm with REK when it comes to dogs; don't like 'em. Never had any pets.
Try again Mikey.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1638 | what a sad boy | FRETZ::HEISER | the rock cries out! | Fri Mar 04 1994 13:07 | 1 |
| see, they couldn't even pay the dogs to play with you.
|
9.1639 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Fri Mar 04 1994 13:31 | 10 |
| Well, I'm a Philadelphia fan who is also a fan of Barkley and Ryan. I
don't know that I can pull for Phoenix when they play Philadelphia, but
I'll be cherring for them on the other games.
While neither Ryan or Barkley won a championship in Philadelphia, they
made the games fun and interesting and , IMO as a fan, that's all you
can ask for. Both teams have become pretty boring since they left.
Dennis Faust
|
9.1640 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sat Mar 05 1994 20:11 | 5 |
| weak Mike, real weak. See MikeH, to really insult it usually helps to
have a little wit and originality to it. You fail on all counts.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1641 | nice comeback you have there, TCM | FRETZ::HEISER | the rock cries out! | Mon Mar 07 1994 12:25 | 1 |
|
|
9.1642 | MacMahon's been traded!!! | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Whitewater<<<Contra (Bush knew) | Tue Mar 15 1994 09:41 | 4 |
| Seriously, the Vikes cut the stiff yesterday. Something about being overpaid,
overrated and failing to deliver.
=Bob=
|
9.1643 | Buddy trying to save money to get the defensive studs | FRETZ::HEISER | impeach the President and her husband | Tue Mar 15 1994 11:16 | 1 |
| Rumor has it that Buddy may sign him.
|
9.1644 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Long lost recipe | Tue Mar 15 1994 18:49 | 4 |
| ] JimmyMac is a backup. I wonder what Salisbury is doing. Didn't he
want starting QB wages? He's also a good backup.
Tim
|
9.1645 | 2 Point conversion may be coming to the NFL | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Mar 18 1994 12:08 | 60 |
|
[email protected] articles by Wed, 16 Mar 94:
--------
Subject: NFL Ready To Adopt 2-Point PAT
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 94 19:00:10 PST
NEW YORK (AP) -- Thirty-six years after it became a fixture in
college football, the NFL seems ready to adopt the two-point
conversion.
Joe Browne, the NFL's vice-president for communications, said
Wednesday the league's rule-making competition committee will urge
the owners to adopt the two-point rule at their meetings next week
in Orlando.
``If I were going to give you an overall theme of the
meetings,'' Browne said during a conference call, ``it would be to
re-emphasize touchdowns and de-emphasize field goals.''
Last year, 24 percent of the NFL's points came on field goals,
the most in league history. There also were three field goals for
every four touchdowns compared to a 1-2 ratio a decade ago.
Colleges adopted the two-point conversion in 1958 and it was
used in the old American Football League before it merged with the
NFL. It also was used in the United States Football League.
But the NFL has always resisted the change for several reasons --
in part because it has overtime; in part because it was a rule in
rival leagues, and in large measure because coaches didn't want to
be faced with additional decisions.
The attitude among coaches, however, has changed, and Browne
said that the change is backed strongly by such former college
coaches as Dennis Green of Minnesota, Jimmy Johnson of Dallas and
Bobby Ross of San Diego.
``I didn't like the idea at first,'' says Miami's Don Shula,
co-chairman of the competition committee.
``But the more I looked at it, the more I realized how it could
help our league. I think it's a way not only to bring excitement to
the game, it's also a way to maker scoring touchdowns a premium. It
can make things look very differently to a team that gets down
early in a game.''
The NFL proposal, which must be approved by 21 of the 28 active
teams, will put the ball at the 2-yard-line rather than the
3-yard-line, where it is placed in college. Browne said the 2-yard
line is preferred because that's where the ball is put for kicks
and it will encourage use of the new play.
If approved, the new rule would take effect this season.
Unlike colleges, however, the defensive team will not be able to
score on a botched conversion attempt. Under a rule adopted by the
colleges in 1988, the defense can get two points by returning an
interception or a fumble for a score.
In addition to the two-point rule, the competition committee
will try to get more kickoff returns into the game by recommending
that kickoffs be moved back to the 30-yard line from the 35. Last
year, only 68.5 percent of kickoffs were returned compared to 87
percent in 1978.
The last time the kickoff line was moved was in 1974, when it
went to the 35 from the 40. That season, returns were up from 74.4
percent to 92.1 percent.
``It's a credit to the kickers,'' Browne said. ``But the biggest
problem we wanted to address was getting more touchdowns into the
game.''
|
9.1646 | Realignment on the horizon? | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Mar 18 1994 12:13 | 32 |
|
[email protected] articles by Thu, 17 Mar 94:
--------
Subject: Rooney Seeks NFL Realignment
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 94 12:20:26 PST
PITTSBURGH (AP) -- Pittsburgh Steelers president Dan Rooney said
he'll lobby for broad realignment at the NFL owners meetings this
weekend in Orlando, Fla.
With expansion adding two teams, it's now or never, said Rooney,
who is pessimistic about his chances.
``I think realignment would do so much for the league from an
interest standpoint,'' Rooney said. ``And I think it's going to be
a missed opportunity.''
The NFL will expand to 30 teams in 1995, when the Carolina
Panthers and Jacksonville Jaguars begin play.
Rooney wants to preserve rivalries like the 49ers-Rams and
Steelers-Browns, but he wants to see new ones like Dallas-Houston
and Miami-Tampa Bay.
Pittsburgh could join Buffalo, Indianapolis or Charlotte in a
regional central division, Rooney said.
The Steelers have competed in the AFC Central since the NFL-AFL
merger in 1970 and have played in the same division with Cleveland
since 1950.
Rooney needs a two-thirds majority of 21 teams to pass any
realignment plan. It takes only eight teams to kill any plan.
Joe Browne, NFL vice president of communication and development,
said there are seven realignment plans under consideration. Most
plans divide the league evenly into six divisions of five teams
each.
|
9.1647 | | HANNAH::ASHE | like sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his lives | Tue Mar 22 1994 16:19 | 2 |
| The NFL approved the 2 point conversion for their league.
|
9.1648 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Tue Mar 22 1994 17:22 | 1 |
| from the 2 or the 3?
|
9.1649 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Wed Mar 23 1994 08:26 | 4 |
|
Pretty sureit isfrom the 2. They also moved kickoffs to the 30.
Marc
|
9.1650 | Push 'em back | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Mar 23 1994 08:52 | 8 |
| Missed field goal spots too.
If a team misses the field goal, the defending team gets the ball
at the spot of the kick, not the line of scrimmage.
This will probably cut down on 50+ yard field goal attempts....
Zamboni
|
9.1651 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Mr.Clinton, Linda Thompson is right | Wed Mar 23 1994 11:07 | 2 |
| If you grab a turnover during a PAT or 2-pt attempt and score at the
other end zone, do you get the PAT value or 6 points?
|
9.1652 | | HANNAH::ASHE | like sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his lives | Wed Mar 23 1994 11:09 | 1 |
| Where does a PAT get lined up? Can you fake the PAT and go for 2?
|
9.1653 | now he has to get a real field goal kicker | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dean's gone fishin' | Wed Mar 23 1994 11:46 | 10 |
|
you can't score defensively on PAT atleast that's what they were saying
last week. I don't think they changed their minds yesterday.
biggest crybaby over the new rules: Dan Reeves..........
why am I not surprised?????
mike
|
9.1654 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 23 1994 11:49 | 4 |
| � If you grab a turnover during a PAT or 2-pt attempt and score at the
� other end zone, do you get the PAT value or 6 points?
Neither, it's a deadball.
|
9.1655 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Wed Mar 23 1994 18:27 | 8 |
| > <<< Note 9.1653 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Dean's gone fishin'" >>>
> -< now he has to get a real field goal kicker >-
With the salary cap, I'm gonna bet htat there will be a bunch of decent
FG kickers around. With the kickiffs moved back to the 30, Treadwell
SHOULD be gone.
brews
|
9.1656 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Member:RoyalCanadianKiltedYaksmen | Thu Mar 24 1994 12:02 | 4 |
| Re: salary cap
wait until all the final cuts are made. Should be some good talent on
the waiver wire this season.
|
9.1657 | George to the Falcons | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Thu Mar 24 1994 13:13 | 5 |
| The Colts traded Jeff George to the Falcons for a 1st and a 3rd round
draft pick in this year's draft and 2nd round in 96 - which could be
upgraded to a 1st based on performance.
Mike
|
9.1658 | Wilkinson would have been nice, but Pats had to go and win ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Mar 24 1994 13:55 | 16 |
|
> The Colts traded Jeff George to the Falcons for a 1st and a 3rd round
> draft pick in this year's draft and 2nd round in 96 - which could be
> upgraded to a 1st based on performance.
Nobody's come out and reported any of the NE braintrust's thoughts on it,
but I'm starting to see the scenario where my man Field Marshall Faulk
comes to the Patriots, whether he was their first priority or not-- it
looks like Wilkinson to Cincinnati, Shuler/Dilfer to Indianapolis,
Dilfer/Shuler to Washington, and then Faulk looks like at least the
biggest name from the remaining proverbial "best available athletes"
(then again, Wheatley's up there too, I guess). Anyone heard anything
else; any other possibilities?
glenn
|
9.1660 | | HANNAH::ASHE | like sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his lives | Thu Mar 24 1994 14:07 | 2 |
| You mean Antonio Langham? DB - 'bama?
|
9.1662 | wheatly? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Mar 24 1994 14:47 | 4 |
| I thought that Wheatly from Michigan was going to continue in college?
Frank
|
9.1663 | | HANNAH::ASHE | like sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his lives | Fri Mar 25 1994 09:24 | 2 |
| Yup, he stayed in school..
|
9.1664 | Of course nobody will touch Hebert at his price... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Whitewater<<<Contra (Bush knew) | Fri Mar 25 1994 10:02 | 14 |
| OK, another trade that looks stoopid to me...
The Falcons gave three draft choices - #1(!) and #3 this year, and #2 nexted
year, for that chicken-butt stiff Jeff George. The GM was quoted as saying
that George could "take them to the next level". The talk was that tihs move
allows them to dump Bobby Hebert's salary, as well as escaping paying two
draft choices thised year.
It seems to me that a) George will take them nowhere, is a stiff, and certainly
no improvement over Hebert, b) draft choices are how you build your club,
and that they should dump veterans instead, and c) they were totally rooked in
the deal.
=Bob=
|
9.1665 | | MKFSA::LONG | That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! | Fri Mar 25 1994 10:04 | 5 |
| =Bob=, does that mean you won't vote for Jeff George for the HOF?
Just want to be clear...
billl
|
9.1666 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri Mar 25 1994 13:09 | 4 |
| > =Bob=, does that mean you won't vote for Jeff George for the HOF?
> Just want to be clear...
Well I like him beter than Pat Riley...
|
9.1667 | ANd to make a bad trade worse ... | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass - 1995 NCAA Champs! | Fri Mar 25 1994 13:32 | 3 |
| If the Falcons win seven games nexted season, the #2 pick becomes a #1!
NAZZ
|
9.1668 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Mar 28 1994 15:53 | 4 |
| The Atlanta/Jeff George trade sounds almost as stupid as the
Minnesota/Herchel Walker trade. Indy come out the big winner.
Keith
|
9.1669 | just reported... | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Mar 29 1994 15:55 | 1 |
| Jimmy Johnson just resigned.
|
9.1670 | Realignment scenarios | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:00 | 73 |
| From: [email protected] (AP)
Subject: NFL Weighs Realignment Ideas
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 94 15:40:25 PST
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) -- The NFL unveiled four possible scenarios
for realignment Wednesday, with traditional have-not teams doing
most of the shifting.
The four plans are designed to absorb the expansion Carolina
Panthers and Jacksonville Jaguars beginning in 1995. If the owners
can't agree on what to do, commissioner Paul Tagliabue has the
authority to insert Carolina and Jacksonville into the two
divisions that now have four teams each.
``These are just a few of the ideas we've had,'' said Wellington
Mara, co-chairman of the expansion committee. ``There probably are
as many ideas as there are teams.''
Most of the proposals shift teams that are traditionally toward
the bottom of the standings or less attractive on television while
leaving the more attractive and successful teams where they are.
For example, all four plans keep Dallas with the New York
Giants, Washington and Philadelphia in the NFC East but ship out
the newly renamed Arizona Cardinals in three of them. Indianapolis
and Tampa Bay are moved elsewhere in all four.
Of the ``have'' teams, only Minnesota and Houston are moved in
more than one.
The owners also:
--approved for at least two years the sale of the Miami Dolphins
to Wayne Huizenga, contingent on a change in the league's policy of
prohibiting ownership of teams in more than one sport. Huizenga,
who also owns baseball's Florida Marlins and hockey's Florida
Panthers, will have full authority to run the team, although it
technically will be held in trust until June 1, 1996.
--approved use of a radio that would allow coaches to send plays
to quarterbacks. It cuts off with 15 seconds left on the game clock
and will be used at least for this season on an experimental basis.
--watched as one of their number, Dallas' Jerry Jones, emphasized
that Jimmy Johnson was still his coach despite their latest rift --
the result of an early-morning barroom conversation in which Jones
suggested he might replace the coach of his two-time Super Bowl
champions with former Oklahoma coach Barry Switzer.
Of most interest for the long-term were the realignment
proposals.
The first is the least radical.
It leaves the NFC East and AFC West intact; inserts Jacksonville
into the NFC West and Carolina into the AFC Central, and switches
only two existing teams -- Indianapolis from the AFC East to the NFC
Central and Tampa Bay the other way, from the NFC Central to the
AFC East.
The second puts Carolina in the NFC Central and Jacksonville in
the AFC East; transfers Arizona to the AFC West, replacing the
Cardinals in the East with Tampa Bay and moves Indianapolis to the
AFC Central.
The third concept moves eight teams and the fourth concept nine.
In the third, Jacksonville is placed in the AFC East and
Carolina in the NFC Central.
But the NFC West is radically altered, retaining only the Los
Angeles Rams and San Francisco and adding the Cardinals, Vikings
and Seattle Seahawks. Atlanta and New Orleans, currently in the NFC
West, end up in the AFC Central, Houston is shifted to the AFC West
and Tampa Bay replaces Arizona in the NFC East.
The fourth is a variation of that with New Orleans in the NFC
Central; Atlanta in the AFC East, and Buffalo and Indianapolis in
the AFC Central. Minnesota, Arizona and Seattle are again in the
NFC West; Tampa Bay in the NFC East, and Houston in the AFC West.
Along with that, the NFL is exploring a scheduling change that
would allow regular rivalries to be played annually or every two
years.
That would include games between Jets-Giants, Rams-Raiders,
Pittsburgh-Philadelphia, Dallas-Houston, Miami-Tampa Bay and the
two expansion teams across conference lines. It might also include
intra-conference rivalries like Buffalo-Pittsburgh.
|
9.1671 | | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Wed Mar 30 1994 11:28 | 14 |
|
The Cowboys can kiss their three-peat chance good bye. What could have
been another dynasty will disintegrate within the next year. The new coach will
have to rebuild with cheaper players much the same way Johnson started out five
years ago. Johnson may be leaving because he does not wish to have to go through
the same challenge again. What does he have to prove?
IMOH the new salary cap is going to see many of the older veterans cut and
replaced by the cheaper young guys. The biggest impact will be in lineman.
QB's and nack will still continue to get all the money.
Cadzilla2
|
9.1672 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Mar 30 1994 11:38 | 6 |
| re: .1671
sweet words; I hope you are right.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1673 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu Mar 31 1994 10:14 | 3 |
| The Colts sign (or are going to soon sign) Jimmah Harbough...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.1674 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Long lost recipe | Thu Mar 31 1994 21:50 | 3 |
| re-1
The colts won't go far again
|
9.1675 | | MKFSA::LONG | That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! | Fri Apr 01 1994 09:43 | 7 |
| >>QUASER::JACKSONTA "Long lost recipe"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I did not! Hail, I'd be the laughin' stock of Walton's Mountain
if'n I did that.
billl
|
9.1676 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | A thing is a terrible mind to waste! | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:02 | 9 |
| re 9.1671
Last time I checked they were still undefeated :-)
Last time I checked they were still the SB Champs.
They haven't lost any player of great signifance as of yet.
Doom and Gloom is a bit premature.
|
9.1677 | Norton will leave | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:07 | 2 |
| If you were a bigtime FA on Dallas now, what would motivate you to
stay?
|
9.1678 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | A thing is a terrible mind to waste! | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:15 | 7 |
| Norton was more a team player than an individual great. He will be
missed but it won't be as bad a folks think without him.
Robert Jones played middle the year before and the defense was actually
better than this past year(statistically).
Let him go
|
9.1679 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Take a Sad Song and Make it Better | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:18 | 14 |
| >> If you were a bigtime FA on Dallas now, what would motivate you to
>> stay?
Are you serious Mike? How 'bout the ability to continue playing on the
BEST team in the NFL. Ain't even close. Barry Switzer is a proven
winner and motivator. Aikman was quoted as saying Switzer was the best
motivational coach that he'd ever played for! Outside of financial
aspects, most players want to have the chance to play on a championship
caliber team.
Dallas thus far has lost nobody that would impact their chances of a
3-peat next season. Time will tell.
- Rope
|
9.1680 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | A thing is a terrible mind to waste! | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:23 | 6 |
| Berry recruited Aikman and must have been a pretty good coach because
Aikman has nothing but good things to say about Berry.
Unfortunatly Aikman got hurt and when Aikman saw that he would not fit
in the scheme of things at Oklahoma it was Berry who help himin seeking
and transfering to UCLA.
|
9.1681 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | A thing is a terrible mind to waste! | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:25 | 2 |
| Actually the only player they have lost that has some signifance is Ed
Murry. He did a great job this past season and he will be missed.
|
9.1682 | | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Fri Apr 01 1994 11:35 | 5 |
| > BEST team in the NFL. Ain't even close. Barry Switzer is a proven
> winner and motivator. Aikman was quoted as saying Switzer was the best
Barry's accomplishments don't count because he's a cheater running a
dirty program and the NCAA didn't have a salary cap.
|
9.1683 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | A thing is a terrible mind to waste! | Fri Apr 01 1994 17:31 | 3 |
| How did he cheat? The players still play the game. Not the coach.
|
9.1684 | | HANNAH::ASHE | like sands thru the hourglass, so were the days of his lives | Fri Apr 01 1994 18:44 | 2 |
| GO WISHBONE!!!
|
9.1685 | Walton's Mountain? Push him off (-) | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Long lost recipe | Sat Apr 02 1994 13:46 | 6 |
| re .1675
That's part of a line from Van Halen's Poundcake tune off of the
Unlawful Carnal knowledge CD.
Tim
|
9.1686 | Moon to the Vikes? What does Doc have to say? | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Apr 07 1994 12:41 | 31 |
|
[email protected] articles by Tue, 5 Apr 94:
--------
Subject: Report: Moon May Be Dealt
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 94 6:50:11 PDT
HOUSTON (AP) -- Cody Carlson could get a restructured contract
with the Houston Oilers as early as Tuesday, paving the way for
Warren Moon to be dealt to the Minnesota Vikings, sources told the
Houston Chronicle.
The Oilers and Vikings have been talking for some time, and deal
reportedly is in the works for Houston to get a fourth-round draft
choice this year and a third-round pick in 1995 for Moon, the
Chronicle reported in Tuesday's editions.
A deal to unload a quarterback seems inevitable because Houston
will have trouble fitting both quarterbacks' salaries under the
$34.2 million cap. Each has a contract for at least $3 million for
1994.
Carlson is under a two-year, $8.85 million deal he signed last
year. The team is trying to restructure it by shaving about $1
million from his 1994 salary and adding a year.
Carlson's agent, Vic Vines, resumed negotiations Monday for a
three-year deal with general manager Floyd Reese and general
counsel Steve Underwood. Carlson is vacationing in Africa.
``We made progress, but the deal wasn't finalized,'' Vines said.
``We're hoping to resolve this matter within the next couple of
days.''
Moon is to make $3.25 million this year and $3 million next
year.
|
9.1687 | Looks like arough season nexted year for the Pack | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu Apr 07 1994 14:32 | 1 |
| Moon will be HUGE improvement over Jim "da Stiff" McMahon...
|
9.1688 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Clinton Impeachment: 14.2M+ signatures | Thu Apr 07 1994 15:15 | 1 |
| McMahon said he wants to finish his career in Phoenix.
|
9.1689 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Apr 07 1994 15:18 | 4 |
| joy in mudville.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1690 | raisin | HBAHBA::HAAS | The karma ran over my dogma | Thu Apr 07 1994 15:19 | 5 |
| > McMahon said he wants to finish his career in Phoenix.
I thought it was Arizona now.
TTom
|
9.1691 | MrT Geography 101 | FRETZ::HEISER | Clinton Impeachment: 14.2M+ signatures | Thu Apr 07 1994 15:27 | 1 |
| Phoenix is in Arizona.
|
9.1692 | NFL 101 | HBAHBA::HAAS | The karma ran over my dogma | Thu Apr 07 1994 15:28 | 1 |
| So he wants to live in Phoenix? Play for Arizona?
|
9.1693 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu Apr 07 1994 15:29 | 3 |
| re: McMahon
He was finished after the 1985 Super Bowl, it's just that nobody told him.
|
9.1694 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Old Man and the PC | Thu Apr 07 1994 15:30 | 10 |
| Jim McMahon is dried up, like a raisin in the sun......
'Saw
PS If you're "local", and you can tell me the correct answer as to where
the line "raisin in the sun" comes from, I'll buy you a beer sometime
at a get together.....
|
9.1695 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Mon Apr 11 1994 15:16 | 17 |
| >PS If you're "local", and you can tell me the correct answer as to
>where the line "raisin in the sun" comes from, I'll buy you a beer
>sometime
That's easy 'saw. It's from that smarmy pop song of the '70's. It
goes like this:
We had joy, we had fun,
We had raisins in the sun.
One of my favorites, right after Honey.
I remain (sorry Kev), working on how to get local, so's I can have that
beer.
brews
|
9.1696 | | CAMONE::WAY | Smells like dead teen spirit | Mon Apr 11 1994 15:21 | 4 |
| Nah, it came from a poem by Langston Hughes, about Harlem.
'Saw
|
9.1697 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Mon Apr 11 1994 15:24 | 5 |
|
Hughes stole it from that song, 'saw. Don't you remember that big
legal battle?
brews
|
9.1698 | | CAMONE::WAY | Smells like dead teen spirit | Mon Apr 11 1994 15:30 | 5 |
| >
> Hughes stole it from that song, 'saw. Don't you remember that big
> legal battle?
Oh, I thought that was The Rascals that had that problem.....8^)
|
9.1699 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Apr 11 1994 17:16 | 8 |
| anyways it was
seasons in the sun
but what do those desert dwellers know anyway! :-)
The Crazy Met
|
9.1700 | SNARF - Brews' hero | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Mon Apr 11 1994 17:35 | 1 |
| "Seasons in the Sun" - Terry Jack
|
9.1701 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Burn the Tiger road pajamas! | Mon Apr 11 1994 17:52 | 2 |
| That's Terry Jacks...
|
9.1702 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Tue Apr 12 1994 13:43 | 7 |
| >anyways it was
>seasons in the sun
>but what do those desert dwellers know anyway! :-)
>The Crazy Met
Gee, TC*, you are sew smart.
|
9.1703 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Whaddya want for nuttin'? | Wed Apr 13 1994 12:21 | 54 |
| Answer to Mac's question about Doc and Moon and the Vikes...
Well, like I told ya, Moon was a Vike ... thoughts :
1. I figured Moon was gone after the Chiefs' loss. Despite the fact that that
was one of the worst displays of pass protection in NFL history (Theismann
summed it up by saying "Offensive Line Incompentence"), when I was in Houston
in Feburary, the press savaged Moon. And I'm sorry to say, call-in shows were
divided along some obvious lines (not offensive/defensive either). The skids
have been greased for a while.
2. I didn't think even Bud Adams would be as stupid to trade Moon within the
AFC. That left Washington, Phoenix, Minnesota, and Atlanta in the NFC. I don't
think that Detroit or LA was even really in the running. I heard LA made a
MAJOR run at Moon (who is from LA), but they are IMO, at least three years away
(when Moon is 40). The Lions have more holes than they think, and I believe
that the coaching was a much larger headache than the QB situation. If nothing
else changes, I pity Scott Mitchell. (He ain't 'The Answer', IMO. And the fans
will eat him alive.) Buddy Ryan in Phoenix ended that idea, and Washington is
seriously rebuliding. That leaves Atlanta (my fav), and Minnesota. Of course,
Atlanta traded for Boy George ....
3. Originally, the asking price was two number 2 picks (one conditional).That
got lowered, as this utterly screwed up free agency system has made it a
buyer's market for GM's. (Aside - Gene Upshaw, one of my all-time favorite
players, has got to be Dunce Of The Decade. Hands down. Micheal Irvin should
become his successor, and fast.)
4. If the deal goes through, it's hard to say who will win. Moon *definitely*
upgrades the QB position for Minnesota (McMahon had to be the most overrated QB
in recent memory), and they have a good coach in Green, deep at RB (*if* Robert
Smith and Terry Allen return to pre-injury form), and they signed Chris Hinton.
But Chris Doleman may be as good as gone, and the Vikes need a top-shelf WR as
bad as the Pats do (AC is fried - stick a fork in him). But Moon is the best QB
the Vikes have had since Tarkenton (hero of my youth :-), and the healthiest.
Plus this is the NFC Central, so even with stronger clubs in Chicago and Green
Bay, that can only help.
On the other hand, I think the Oilers are in deep kaka. Carlson is a good QB.
Moon was a great QB, and it may show as soon as next year. Morale is not good,
and the team will almost certainly lose Sean Jones, along with William Fuller.
Throw in possible defections by Haywood Jeffries, Greg Montgomery, Al Smith,
and a few others, and we are talking about a *volaitle* mix. Plus the team is
switching to a multiple offense (some R&S, but a little Buffalo 1-back, and
conventional 2-back sets) - more adjustments. And then the Oilers are losing
team leaders in Moon and Jones. The Oilers are a team that can go 11-5 next
year, or 8-8 just as easily.
But I guess it's funny how things run in circles. The Vikes were my first team
until the Les(s) Steckel Reign of Err. I might have to check on purple number 1
jerseys after all.
Doc
|
9.1704 | | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Wed Apr 13 1994 13:13 | 1 |
| I noticed Doc said Atlanta is his fave now. Is he living there?
|
9.1705 | "Rap Rap Rap they call him the Rapper" | CNTROL::CHILDS | Brillant, Charming and Nasty | Wed Apr 13 1994 13:22 | 14 |
|
>> I noticed Doc said Atlanta is his fave now. Is he living there?
I think Doctor manymanyzeros was refering to Hot'Lanta as his
fave place for Moon to go. I could be wrong and I'm sure that those
wicked black jerseys have nothing to do with Doc's choice....
;^)
one thing Walt ask him for me please whose better Mourning or "Do you
want see me Pass? NO! Do you want see me shoot? No! Do you want to see
me Dunk it? Yes!"
mike
|
9.1706 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Whaddya want for nuttin'? | Wed Apr 13 1994 13:28 | 5 |
| Yeah, he meant for where Moon should have wound up. But he may change
affiliations to the Vikes now. Although, he did switch 2 years ago on
the X-Men from #1 to #21 (Deion)... He's working up here still. He'll be
at the get together Friday and the game Monday...
|
9.1707 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Whaddya want for nuttin'? | Wed Apr 13 1994 14:37 | 38 |
| Don't get Doc started.... from him....
Yeah, I would have rather seen Moon in Atlanta - the offense is more
compatible, speed receivers, and plenty of talent on both sides of the
ball.
And yes, they have the best jerseys in the NFL. I'm not sure Minnesota
is a Super Bowl contender even with Moon, unless/until they sign and keep
Doleman, and pick up a quality deep threat.
Shaq v. Zo
What cracks me up is all of the people taking the pro-Zo side who hated
his guts at Georgetown. (too dirty, too mean, attitude, etc ...) Why don't
they find a bandwagon and stay on it ?
I think both guys are a couple of years away - 'Zo needs to stay healthy,
and the Hornets may need a better coach. Shaq needs to expand his shot
selection, and the Magic need to find him some help at PF.
In any case, this is too beautiful - the Celtic Jihad Faithful, with no
one to root for in green, have sunken to proxy masterbation (or is it
massa-bation) of the Russell era. I LOVE IT !
BTW, Hakeem is near-deity anyhow, Shaq, Zo and the other guys will have
to wait their turn.
Doc
p.s. Did you hear how somebody on Imus said that Ewing got b-slapped by
Shaq ? Roolwaard.
p.p.s. Wilt > Russell. Just remember who was the doorman in the
original Reebok
commericial while Wilt was sipping his morning coffee .... (admittedly it
should have been Walton doing the toilets ...)
|
9.1708 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Apr 13 1994 14:45 | 7 |
|
> Why don't they find a bandwagon and stay on it ?
coming from Doc, that line is areal hoot.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1709 | | CAMONE::WAY | Smells like dead teen spirit | Wed Apr 13 1994 14:47 | 1 |
| Russell > Wilt....
|
9.1710 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Apr 13 1994 14:54 | 8 |
|
so what does Russell and Wilt have to do with the NFL??
For MtM :-)
The Crazy Met
|
9.1711 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Brillant, Charming and Nasty | Wed Apr 13 1994 15:33 | 10 |
|
You got love that Doc he can still "reach out and taunt someone"....
For the record please remind him that I was Zo's biggest fan while at
Georgetown and now. It was me who first drew the Zo > Shaq comparision
to the Russell > Wilted at which everyone laughed but Hawk......
thanks Walt....good to see the Doc hasn't changed.....
mike
|
9.1712 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Apr 13 1994 15:34 | 4 |
| yabbut, all Hawk wanted to do was party.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1713 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Whaddya want for nuttin'? | Wed Apr 13 1994 15:35 | 2 |
| For Doc... it started talking about Moon and the Falcon jerseys...
|
9.1714 | Vikes need Moon | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Wed Apr 13 1994 17:15 | 7 |
| Hey Walt,
Ask Doc what Cris Carter is, if he isn't a top notch WR. After CC,
they could use some help.
Spud
|
9.1715 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Whaddya want for nuttin'? | Thu Apr 14 1994 10:37 | 42 |
|
From Doc: The Vikes fan who doesn't know how to spell Cris Carter's name.
Ask Bob Hunt. Chris is tremendous inside the 20. And a hell of a leaper. But he
is so-so over the middle, and had a brutal game vs the Jints in the wild-card
game. And has only good speed. In this league, you need a burner. I mean a guy
who can flat out haul ass, because NOTHING can screw up a sophisticated
coverage like sheer speed. You have to respect it and/or get some speed to
cover speed. (There is a reason why I didn't mention free agent Haywood
Jeffries, although CC can fill that role.)
The Vikes need at least one, and probably two real threats on the outside - and
I have a question : How much does Steve Jordan have left ?
Question 2 : Will Robert Smith get moved to WR ? There was talk of that last
year ....
Aside : There is a possible (and tenuous) analogy to Montana going to KC.
Big-time QB to new team, with a supporting cast that isn't as good as the
former team. However, 1) Moon is a lot healthier, but 2) KC fixed their offense
to accomodate Joe (unpreceedented as far as I know), Moon may not get that
luxury, IMO - although the story goes that Green would much rather use a
controlled passing game al la SF/Wash, rather than the attack of the past few
years. Hence the reason for the firing of OC Jack Burns last year. Trouble was,
it was only then that Green realized that McMahon was more of the problem than
the offense (notice that Sailsbury threw for more yardage per game (+50 yds)
than McMahon).
In any case, next season will be an odd one. I wonder if the Player's
Association Contract will be voided by 1996 ?
Idea : Say I am a member of the NFLPA. I'm in line for a salary increase from
say $400,000 to $1,200,000 as a transistion player or such. But the cap gets me
cut, and I am forced to sign a 1 year deal at $650,000. Okay then, I stop
paying my dues, and resign from the NFLPA. I get 20 of my teammates to do so as
well. Now since I'm not a member, I am not bound by the agreement, hence my
salary doesn't affect the cap. Suspend me for not being a member, and you lose
half of the team, including at least 5-6 starters. Say I am the Cowboys, Bills,
Niners, or Oilers. Ouch.
What do you think ? Do I ultimately get my 1.2 M ???
|
9.1716 | Cris Carter | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Thu Apr 14 1994 13:07 | 28 |
| Hey Walt, tell Doc to stuff it! :*)
Actually I think his name is spelled Cris. There is a Cris out there
somewhere, anyway.
I dunno, most of the games I watched, he was always making a big play.
Part of the problem with the Giants game was the wind, Giants D and
MacMahon. I would have to disagree and I know a lot of Vikes fans seem
to believe Cris is Pro Bowl caliber.
Anyway, it's sounds like a done deal with Moon now, so I'd have to say
for this year anyway, the Vikes have the best QB in the Central going
into the season. (aFvre :*) is getting there, but still makes too many
mistakes. With a healthy Terry Allan coming back, the offense
might finally click like we've hoped it would consistantly. Jordan
should be around at least another year too.
Smith is still rehabbing from his injury and probably won't be 100% to
start the season. I don't know of any plans to move him to WR right
now.
Tell Doc to come back to the Vikes for unlike Herschel, this was a
great move. The Vikes have some additional early rounds picks in the
draft too, so the future is looking good.
Spud
|
9.1717 | | CAMONE::WAY | Smells like dead teen spirit | Thu Apr 14 1994 13:11 | 4 |
| When the Vikings are in a big game, in a tight spot, Warren Moon will
choke just as badly as he did the past two seasons with the Oilers.
It's a given.....
|
9.1718 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Whaddya want for nuttin'? | Thu Apr 14 1994 14:10 | 2 |
| Vikes-Bills Super Bowl?
|
9.1719 | but who would choke hardest? | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu Apr 14 1994 15:04 | 1 |
|
|
9.1720 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Long lost recipe | Thu Apr 14 1994 17:05 | 2 |
| re-1
Not Linda Lovlace (-)
|
9.1721 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Apr 14 1994 17:09 | 7 |
| re: .1720
yo' man you gonna come on over and clean up the coffee that
is all over my screen??
The Crazy Met
|
9.1722 | Buddy's gonna kidnap Reggie | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Thu Apr 14 1994 17:15 | 2 |
| The Pack is out here holding a mini-camp and it's free and open to the
public. Sounds like we're gonna start a Cactus league for the NFL too.
|
9.1723 | First 2 rounds o' draft | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Mon Apr 25 1994 11:48 | 91 |
| Article: 18180
From: [email protected] (AP)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football.games,clari.sports.top
Subject: NFL Draft List - Rounds 1-2
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 94 21:10:07 PDT
NEW YORK (AP) -- Selections Sunday in the 1994 NFL draft with
team, player, projected position and college (x-compensatory
selection):
First Round
1, Cincinnati, Dan Wilkinson, dt, Ohio State.
2, Indianapolis, Marshall Faulk, rb, San Diego State.
3, Washington, Heath Shuler, qb, Tennessee.
4, New England, Willie McGinest, de, Southern Cal.
5, Indianapolis (from Los Angeles Rams), Trev Alberts, lb,
Nebraska.
6, Tampa Bay, Trent Dilfer, qb, Fresno State.
7, San Francisco (from Atlanta through Indianapolis and Los
Angeles Rams), Bryant Young, dt, Notre Dame.
8, Seattle, Sam Adams, de, Texas A&M.
9, Cleveland, Antonio Langham, db, Alabama.
10, Arizona, Jamir Miller, lb, UCLA.
11, Chicago, John Thierry, lb, Alcorn State.
12, New York Jets (from New Orleans), Aaron Glenn, db, Texas
A&M.
13, New Orleans (from New York Jets), Joe Johnson, de,
Louisville.
14, Philadelphia, Bernard Williams, ot, Georgia.
15, Los Angeles Rams (from San Diego through San Francisco),
Wayne Gandy, ot, Auburn.
16, Green Bay (from Miami), Aaron Taylor, ot, Notre Dame.
17, Pittsburgh, Charles Johnson, wr, Colorado.
18, Minnesota (from Denver), DeWayne Washington, cb, North
Carolina State.
19, Minnesota, Todd Steussie, ot, California.
20, Miami (from Green Bay), Tim Bowens, dt, Mississippi.
21, Detroit, Johnnie Morton, wr, Southern Cal.
22, Los Angeles Raiders, Rob Fredrickson, lb, Michigan State.
23, Dallas (from San Francisco), Shante Carver, de, Arizona
State.
24, New York Giants, Thomas Lewis, wr, Indiana.
25. Kansas City, Greg Hill, rb, Texas A&M.
26, Houston, Henry Ford, de, Arkansas.
27, Buffalo, Jeff Burris, db, Notre Dame.
28, San Francisco (from Dallas), William Floyd, rb, Florida
State
29, x-Cleveland (from Philadelphia), Derrick Alexander, wr,
Michigan
Second Round
30, Cincinnati, Darnay Scott, wr, San Diego State.
31, Washington, Tre Johnson, g, Temple.
32, Indianapolis, Eric Mahlum, g, California.
33, Los Angeles Rams, Isaac Bruce, wr, Memphis State.
34, Tampa Bay, Errict Rhett, rb, Florida.
35, New England, Kevin Lee, wr, Alabama.
36, Seattle, Kevin Mawae, c, Louisiana State.
37, Philadelphia (from Atlanta), Bruce Walker, dt, UCLA.
38, Arizona, Chuck Levy, rb, Arizona.
39, Chicago, Marcus Spears, ot, NW Louisiana.
40, Minnesota (from Cleveland through Philadelphia and Atlanta),
David Palmer, wr, Alabama.
41, New York Jets, Ryan Yarborough, wr, Wyoming.
42, Philadelphia, Charlie Garner, rb, Tennessee.
43, San Diego, Isaac Davis, g, Arkansas.
44, New Orleans, Mario Bates, rb, Arizona State.
45, x-Atlanta (from Minnesota), Bert Emanuel, wr, Rice.
46, x-Dallas, Larry Allen, g, Sonoma State.
47, x-New York Giants, Thomas Randolph, db, Kansas State.
48, x-Buffalo, Bucky Brooks, wr, North Carolina.
49, x-Los Angeles Rams, Toby Wright, db, Nebraska.
50, Pittsburgh, Brentson Buckner, de, Clemson.
51, Denver, Allen Aldridge, lb, Houston.
52, Los Angeles Raiders (from Minnesota), James Folston, lb, NE
Louisiana.
53, San Francisco (from Green Bay), Kevin Mitchell, lb,
Syracuse.
54, Miami, Aubrey Beavers, lb, Oklahoma.
55, Los Angeles Raiders, Fernando Smith, de, Jackson State.
56, Los Angeles Rams (from San Francisco), Brad Ottis, dt, Wayne
State, Neb.
57, Detroit, Van Malone, db, Texas.
58, Kansas City, Donnell Bennett, rb, Miami.
59, New York Giants, Jason Sehorn, db, Southern Cal.
60, Houston, Jeremy Nunley, de, Alabama.
61, Buffalo, Lonnie Johnson, te, Florida State.
62, San Francisco (from Dallas), Tyronne Drakeford, db, Virginia
Tech.
63, x-San Diego, Vaughn Parker, g, UCLA.
64, x-Buffalo, Sam Rogers, lb, Colorado.
65, x-Miami (from Arizona), Tim Ruddy, c, Notre Dame.
|
9.1724 | | CAMONE::WAY | Snake and Nape | Mon Apr 25 1994 12:12 | 4 |
| <<< Note 9.1723 by HBAHBA::HAAS "Maybe too much Goody's Powder" >>>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Been listening to King Richard advertise it too much, eh?
|
9.1725 | do you like good music? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Mon Apr 25 1994 12:25 | 7 |
| Run C&W:
Spotlight on Ralph Emory
Ol' Ralph has lost his memory
Maybe too much Goody's Powder
Oh yeah, Oh Yeah.
TTom
|
9.1726 | | CAMONE::WAY | Snake and Nape | Mon Apr 25 1994 12:35 | 15 |
| >Run C&W:
> Spotlight on Ralph Emory
> Ol' Ralph has lost his memory
> Maybe too much Goody's Powder
> Oh yeah, Oh Yeah.
>
Cool.
I picked up a free sample of Goody's powder at Pocono last year but haven't
ever used it....
'Saw
|
9.1727 | Tobin and Kuiper | CSC32::J_HENSON | and it's still too short! | Mon Apr 25 1994 13:30 | 10 |
| Did anyone catch the Colt's GM Tobin rip Mel Kuiper? Can't say
that I blame him, even though I think that Kuiper is probably right
about the Colts' draft.
Anyway, it was kind of refereshing to hear someone put the so-called
experts in their place. And just what is Mel Kuiper's claim to fame,
anyway? I know he is regarded by the media as the guru of the NFL
draft, but I don't really know why.
Jerry
|
9.1728 | even MikeH has a life, relatively speaking :-) | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Apr 25 1994 13:44 | 5 |
| Well outside of the NFL Draft, Mel Kiper has no life, I mean that is
all the guy does day in and day out.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1729 | had a point | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Mon Apr 25 1994 13:58 | 8 |
| I like Kiper's response. Something to the effect that if'n the Colts' guy's
worried about what Kiper said, it's no wonder that the Colts are drafting
second everyone year.
Kiper had a point in that Dilfer was up for grabs and the Colts are
looking at starting Jim Harbaugh.
TTom
|
9.1730 | | CAMONE::WAY | Snake and Nape | Mon Apr 25 1994 13:58 | 1 |
| Yeah, I thought that was pretty cool......
|
9.1731 | the draft continues | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Mon Apr 25 1994 14:04 | 123 |
| Article: 8442
From: [email protected] (AP)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football
Subject: Day 2 Of NFL Draft Starts Up
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 7:40:12 PDT
NEW YORK (AP) -- In the new era of free agency, teams want
players who can play now, not take four years to develop and then
leave. So that's the way the first couple of rounds of the NFL
draft went.
So ...
The Cincinnati Bengals hope Dan Wilkinson will jump right in on
the defensive line. Jim Mora expects Joe Johnson to start for New
Orleans. Mike Holmgren wants Aaron Taylor to do the same for the
Green Bay Packers. Ditto for receiver Charles Johnson in
Pittsburgh.
The search for instant contributors was the theme of Sunday's
NFL draft, the first of the free agent salary cap era. As
high-priced veterans are phased out under the cap, low-priced
rookies are brought in.
The draft resumed Monday with a minor bang when the San Diego
Chargers traded fullback Marion Butts to New England in return for
the Patriots' third and fifth-round choices. The Chargers used the
third-rounder to select wide receiver Andre Coleman of Kansas
State.
Cincinnati started the third round with another Ohio State
player to join Wilkinson, running back Jeff Cothran. Then
Indianapolis took tackle Jason Matthews of Texas A&M as the draft
began its long trek through the day.
But few of these players will come close to big money right
away.
One of the wrinkles of free agency is a separate rookie salary
cap that will hold down the payroll for first-year players.
That's part of the contentious goings-on surrounding ``Big
Daddy'' Wilkinson, the 315-pound defensive tackle who was the top
pick overall by Cincinnati.
Wilkinson's agent is Leigh Steinberg, one of the more
highly-regarded player representatives in football. He is dealing
with a team that is traditionally tight-fisted. The polarity of the
two sides could mean a long wait before Wilkinson shows up in
training camp.
But Steinberg, who before the draft asked the Bengals to trade
the choice, was suggesting afterward that there's room for
agreement with general manager Mike Brown.
``Look, our differences are philosophical,'' Steinberg said
after Wilkinson was drafted. ``It doesn't matter whether Mike is
negotiating with Henry Kissinger or Cindy Crawford -- he has a
strong philosophy and he expresses it. We also have a strong
philosophy. We're looking forward to what we hope is a smooth and
harmonious negotiation. I'm sure Dan will be signed and ready well
before training camp.''
Wilkinson was a sophomore at Ohio State, and he led a crop of
underclassmen who were picked early.
Eleven non-seniors were taken with the 29 picks of the first
round. It was also a draft for defense -- 10 of the first 13 picks
were for defenders.
But most of all, it was a draft for players who can produce
immediately.
``They've told me they want me to contribute right away,'' said
Charles Johnson, a receiver from Colorado who slipped down to the
17th spot largely because of the rush to draft defenders. Taylor,
an offensive lineman, was left at 16th for the same reason.
In fact, the only offensive players taken early were running
back Marshall Faulk of San Diego State, by Indianapolis with the
second pick of the draft, and quarterbacks Heath Shuler of
Tennessee (third by Washington) and Trent Dilfer of Fresno State
(sixth by Tampa Bay).
The fourth pick was defensive end Willie McGinest of Southern
Cal, a pass rusher who people in New England will expect Bill
Parcells to turn into Lawrence Taylor. Parcells was more inclined
to compare him to Chris Doleman, who was traded from Minnesota to
Atlana for the Falcons' top draft pick next year and a second-round
pick this year.
``I think, at worst, that's what you've got,'' Parcells said.
``At worst, he's a good pass rushing defensive end and, at best,
he's a guy that can also drop into pass coverage.''
McGinest was the man the Dallas Cowboys wanted but failed to
trade up for.
When New England chose him, owner Jerry Jones, taking over for
departed coach Jimmy Johnson as the Cowboys' chief selector,
slumped over in his chair and slammed his forehead in frustration.
The Cowboys ended up by moving up from 28th to 23rd and taking
Shante Carver, a hybrid like McGinest who is considered more a
long-term project.
After McGinest, Indianapolis moved up to take Nebraska
linebacker Trev Alberts; the Bucs took Dilfer and San Francisco
moved up to take defensive tackle Bryant Young of Notre Dame to
plug the gaps in their defensive line. Then Seattle took another
defensive lineman, Sam Adams of Texas A&M.
Cleveland took Alabama cornerback Antonio Langham with the ninth
pick; Arizona took linebacker Jamir Miller; Chicago took Alcorn
State linebacker John Thierry; the New York Jets got cornerback
Aaron Glenn of Texas A&M; and New Orleans took defensive end Joe
Johnson of Louisville.
Then came three straight offensive linemen and staring with
Bernard Williams of Georgia to the Eagles. The Rams took Wayne
Gandy of Auburn and the Packers took Taylor. Then after the
Steelers took Johnson, the Vikings had two picks, taking cornerback
Dewayne Washington of North Carolina State and tackle Todd Steussie
of Cal.
Miami went for defensive tackle Tim Bowens of Mississippi;
Detroit took wide receiver Johnnie Morton of Southern Cal, and then
came three surprises.
First the Los Angeles Raiders took linebacker Rob Fredrickson of
Michigan State; the Cowboys took Carver, and the New York Giants
took wide receiver Thomas Lewis of Indiana. Lewis was so surprised
that he was asleep when the pick was made.
For Fredrickson, it was a dream come true -- he wore No. 83 at
Michigan State because of his favorite, ex-Raider Ted Hendricks.
``They always had a great winning tradition,'' he said. ``I just
became an instant fan. I couldn't be happier.''
The first round concluded with Texas A&M running back Greg Hill
going to Kansas City; Houston taking defensive end Henry Ford of
Arkansas; Buffalo taking safety Jeff Burris of Notre Dame; San
Francisco taking fullback William Floyd of Florida, and Cleveland
taking wide receiver Derrick Alexander of Michigan.
In the second round, the biggest moves were the products of
trades. The Vikings used Atlanta's second round pick to take David
Palmer, the all-purpose wide receiver-kick returner from Alabama
who can also play quarterback.
Atlanta got a 1995 No. 1 pick back by trading wide receiver Mike
Pritchard to Denver, which already had signed another wide
receiver, Anthony Miller from San Diego.
|
9.1733 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Apr 25 1994 15:14 | 8 |
| The thing is, Kiper isn't held accountable if his choices are complete
busts. But the Colts GM, coaches and scouts all have to deal with the
wrath of the fans and they have their jobs on the line.
As far as I can tell, you can toss a coin to determine who is the better
draft pick between Faulk, Alberts and Dilfer. They're all studs.
Keith
|
9.1735 | should know his stuff | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Mon Apr 25 1994 15:36 | 1 |
| Tobin worked with Buddy Ryan to build the '86 Bears.
|
9.1736 | Mel's right | CNTROL::CHILDS | Brillant, Charming and Nasty | Mon Apr 25 1994 15:39 | 7 |
|
he also said that because while Tobin was with the Bears they never
drafted a small college player and they did waste a first on Harbaugh...
;^)
|
9.1737 | Rounds 3-4 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Mon Apr 25 1994 17:59 | 73 |
| Article: 8445
From: [email protected] (AP)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football
Subject: NFL Draft List -- Rds. 3-4
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 94 10:40:25 PDT
NEW YORK (AP) -- Selections Monday in the 1994 NFL draft with
team, player, projected position and college (x-compensatory
selection):
Third Round
66, Cincinnati, Jeff Cothran, rb, Ohio State. 67, Indianapolis,
Jason Mathews, ot, Texas A&M. 68, Washington, Tydus Winans, wr,
Fresno State. 69, Tampa Bay, Harold Bishop, te, Louisiana State.
70, San Diego (from New England), Andre Coleman, wr, Kansas State.
71, Los Angeles Rams, Keith Lyle, db, Virginia. 72, Atlanta,
Anthony Phillips, db, Texas A&M-Kingsville. 73, Seattle, Lamar
Smith, rb, Houston. 74, Chicago, Jim Flanigan, dt, Notre Dame.
75, Cleveland, Romeo Bandison, dt, Oregon. 76, Arizona, Rich
Braham, g, West Virginia. 77, Philadelphia, Joe Panos, g,
Wisconsin. 78, New England (from San Diego), Ervin Collier, dt,
Florida A&M. 79, New Orleans, Winfred Tubbs, lb, Texas. 80, Los
Angeles Raiders (from New York Jets), Calvin Jones, rb, Nebraska.
81, x-Buffalo, Marlo Perry, lb, Jackson State. 82, x-San Diego,
Willie Clark, db, Notre Dame. 83, x-Los Angeles Rams (from Atlanta
through Indianapolis), James Bostic, rb, Auburn.
84, x-Green Bay (from San Francisco), LeShon Johnson, rb,
Northern Illinois. 85, x-San Francisco, Doug Brien, k, California.
86, x-Cincinnati, Steve Shine, lb, Northwestern. 87, San Francisco
(from Denver), Cory Fleming, wr, Tennessee. 88, Pittsburgh (from
Minnesota), Jason Gildon, de, Oklahoma State. 89, Arizona (from
Green Bay through Miami), Eric England, de, Texas A&M. 90, New
England (from Miami), Joe Burch, c, Texas Southern. 91, Pittsburgh,
Byron Morris, rb, Texas Tech. 92, Kansas City (from San Francisco),
Lake Dawson, wr, Notre Dame.
93, Detroit, Shane Bonham, dt, Tennessee. 94, New York Jets
(from Los Angeles Raiders), Lou Benfatti, dt, Penn State. 95, New
York Giants, Gary Downs, rb, North Carolina State. 96, Kansas City,
Chris Penn, wr, Tulsa. 97, Washington (from Houston), Joe Patton,
g, Alabama A&M. 98, Buffalo, Corey Loucheiy, ot, South Carolina.
99, Atlanta (from Dallas through San Francisco and Denver), Alai
Kalaniuvalu, g, Oregon State. 100, x-Los Angeles Rams (from
Philadelphia through San Francisco), Ernest Jones, lb, Oregon. 101,
x-Houston, Malcolm Seabron, wr, Fresno State. 102, x-Dallas, George
Hegamin, ot, North Carolina State. 103, x-Philadelphia, Eric
Zomalt, db, California.
------
Fourth Round
104, Cincinnati, Corey Sawyer, db, Florida State. 105,
Washington, Kurt Haws, te, Utah. 106, Indianapolis, Brad Banta, te,
Southern Cal. 107, New England, Perry Carter, db, Southern
Mississippi. 108, Los Angeles Rams, Chris Brantley, wr, Rutgers.
109, Dallas (from Tampa Bay), Willie Jackson, wr, Florida. 110,
Seattle, Larry Whigham, db, NE Louisiana.
111, Atlanta, Perry Klein, qb, C.W. Post. 112, Miami (from
Cleveland), Ronnie Woolfork, lb, Colorado. 113, Arizona, John
Reece, db, Nebraska. 114, Chicago, Raymont Harris, rb, Ohio State.
115, Arizona (from San Diego through Miami), John Reece, db,
Nebraska. 116, New Orleans, Doug Nussmeier, qb, Idaho. 117, New
York Jets, Orlando parker, wr, Auburn.
118, Atlanta (from Philadelphia), Micth Davis, lb, Georgia. 119,
Houston (from Minnesota), Michael Davis, db, Cincinnati. 120, Los
Angeles Raiders (from Green Bay), Austin Robbins, dt, North
Carolina. 121, New England (from Miami through Arizona), John
Burke, te, Virginia Tech. 122, Pittsburgh, Taase Faumui, de,
Hawaii. 123, Denver, Randy Fuller, db, Tennessee State. 124,
Detroit, Vaughn Bryant, db, Stanford.
125, Minnesota (from Los Angeles Raiders), Mike Wells, dt, Iowa.
126, Green Bay (from San Francisco through Los Angeles Raiders),
Gabe Wilkins, de, Gardner-Webb. 127, Kansas City, Bracey Walker,
db, North Carolina. 128, New York Giants, Chris Maumalanga, dt,
Kansas. 129, Houston, Sean Jackson, rb, Florida State. 130,
Buffalo, Sean Crocker, db, North Carolina. 131, Dallas, DeWayne
Dotson, lb, Mississippi.
|
9.1738 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Thanks Zeke... | Tue Apr 26 1994 20:53 | 5 |
| Kiper's a weasel... I thought Tobin was right... I mean, if Kiper
calls everyone's coach, mother, etc. and says the guys an easy 3rd
rounder and he never gets drafted or signed, why build the kid up
for that?
|
9.1739 | Leshon Johnson A Third Rounder??? | STRATA::BARBIERI | God can be so appreciated! | Fri Apr 29 1994 17:25 | 5 |
| Why did Leshon Johnson drop so far? Sport Magazine had him
going like in the top FIVE overall picks!
Being a Packer fan, I'm glad they got him, but does anyone
know what's up???
|
9.1740 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu May 05 1994 15:24 | 5 |
| My BEAR_REPORT had him as a possible #1 for Da_Bearz, too. When the
Bears looked the other way in round three, I had to wonder what every
one now knows...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.1741 | Big Daddy Signs Today | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu May 05 1994 17:54 | 1 |
| Dan "Big Daddy" Wilkinson signed with Cincinnati today ($16M ?).
|
9.1742 | big guy get big dollars | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Thu May 05 1994 17:56 | 64 |
| Article: 8542
From: [email protected] (AP)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football,clari.local.ohio
Subject: Bengals Ink Big Daddy
Date: Thu, 5 May 94 11:10:22 PDT
CINCINNATI (AP) -- Dan Wilkinson, the No. 1 pick in last month's
NFL draft, signed a six-year, $14.4 million contract Thursday,
ending one of the quickest negotiations with a top pick in
Cincinnati Bengals history.
The signing came just 11 days after the draft and two weeks
after the sides appeared to be at a philosophical impasse.
Wilkinson, a defensive lineman from Ohio State, will receive a
$5 million signing bonus. The Bengals had been opposed to large
signing bonuses.
The contract also contains two ``voidable years,'' one of the
main areas of contention between the Bengals and agent Leigh
Steinberg. The last two years of the contract will be voided if
Wilkinson is on the field for an undisclosed number of plays this
season.
``We hope this sends a message as to the sort of commitment we
have to bring our team back to the top,'' Bengals general manager
Mike Brown said.
The Bengals wanted to break with their history of trouble
signing first-round picks so Wilkinson could be counted upon as a
starter. Wilkinson wanted to avoid a holdout.
``Both parties agreed up front we'd try to set an all-time speed
record if possible,'' Steinberg said. ``Obviously, you have the
history. But it was really important to all the parties to have
this done quickly and expeditiously.''
Steinberg has been involved in two lengthy holdouts by Bengals
first-round picks. Defensive lineman Jason Buck (1987) and
quarterback David Klingler (1992) missed training camp and
preseason before signing.
It looked like another impasse developing when Brown offered
Wilkinson a contract a few days before the April 24 draft. That
offer included an average salary that was $500,000 less than
Indianapolis gave defensive lineman Steve Emtman two years ago.
Brown also rejected ``voidable years.''
The contract Thursday adds up to $14.4 if Wilkinson plays all
six years, an average of $2.4 million a year -- slightly more than
Emtman got.
In addition to the $5 million signing bonus, Wilkinson gets base
salaries of $965,000 this season; $1,206,000 in 1995; $1,447,000 in
1996; $1,688,000 in 1997; $1,930,000 in 1998; and $2,171,000 in
1999.
By comparison, defensive lineman John Copeland -- the team's top
draft pick in 1993 -- signed a five-year contract for $5.8 million
in mid-August last year.
Many draft analysts expected the Bengals to trade the top pick
in part because of their history of contract squabbles. Brown said
he never came close to making a deal with any of the 21 teams that
inquired.
Wilkinson's contract eats up 55.3 percent of the team's money
for signing rookies.
Steinberg said the NFL's current salary-pool arrangement will
encourage others to sign before a big chunk of a team's rookie
money is committed.
``I believe this will be the fastest signing season in history
for NFL rookies because of the year's experience in how the rookie
salary cap operates,'' Steinberg said. ``Instead of players
competing against an owner's pocketbook and willingness to pay, now
it's seven draft picks competing with each other for a share of the
pie. Once the money is gone, it's gone.''
|
9.1743 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri May 06 1994 12:24 | 7 |
| Now that Rodney Peete is a Cowboy, will Doc root for the other Texas
team?
Now that the Jets have picked up Trudeau they will probably dump Nagle.
I suspect we'll see JoJ in here soon turning on Nagle they way he
turned on Thomas and start singing the praises of this fine
Indianapolis castoff.
|
9.1744 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Home of the driveby noter... | Fri May 06 1994 15:20 | 1 |
| Already jumped to the Viking bandwagon
|
9.1745 | | MKFSA::LONG | Two score ain't so bad | Fri May 06 1994 16:40 | 7 |
| >> Already jumped to the Viking bandwagon
Dr 00:00 won't let anyone else on. Not that anyone wants on.
billl
|
9.1746 | You cain thank me later | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass - 1995 NCAA Champs! | Mon May 09 1994 09:56 | 6 |
| Saw Dr. 00:00 this weekend. He almost ran into me and my daughter
after her softball game (she had two hits, her team won 20-4!). The
Doc was his usual self. I made sure I didn't say hi to him from anyone
in here.
NAZZ
|
9.1747 | NFL schedule | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Thu May 12 1994 12:10 | 331 |
| Article: 8577
From: [email protected] (The Associated Press)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.football
Subject: NFL Weekly Schedule
Date: Tue, 10 May 94 16:10:20 PDT
All Times Eastern
Week One
Sunday, Sept. 4
Atlanta at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Houston at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Seattle at Washington, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Arizona at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
Dallas at Pittsburgh, 4 p.m. (FOX)
New England at Miami, 4 p.m.
New York Jets at Buffalo, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Denver, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Monday, Sept. 5
Los Angeles Raiders at San Francisco, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week Two
Sunday, Sept. 11
Buffalo at New England, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles Rams at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Miami vs. Green Bay at Milwaukee, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Denver at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
Houston at Dallas, 4 p.m. (NBC)
Seattle at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m.
Washington at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
New York Giants at Arizona, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Monday, Sept. 12
Chicago at Philadelphia, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week Three
Sunday, Sept. 18
Arizona at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
Buffalo at Houston, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Chicago, 1 p.m.
New England at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at Miami, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles Raiders at Denver, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Seattle, 4 p.m.
San Francisco at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m. (FOX)
Washington at New York Giants, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at Atlanta, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Monday, Sept. 19
Detroit at Dallas, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week Four
(Open Date: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia)
Sunday, Sept. 25
Atlanta at Washington, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles Rams at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Miami at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Houston, 4 p.m.
New England at Detroit, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Seattle, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (NBC)
Chicago at New York Jets, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Monday, Sept. 26
Denver at Buffalo, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week Five
(Open Date: Denver, Kansas City, Los Angeles Raiders, San
Diego)
Sunday, Oct. 2
Dallas at Washington, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at New England, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
Seattle at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
Buffalo at Chicago, 4 p.m.
Minnesota at Arizona, 4 p.m.
New York Giants at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
Philadelphia at San Francisco, 4 p.m. (FOX)
Miami at Cincinnati, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Monday, Oct. 3
Houston at Pittsburgh, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week Six
(Open Date: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Pittsburgh)
Sunday, Oct. 9
Indianapolis at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles Rams at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Miami at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at Chicago, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Arizona at Dallas, 4 p.m.
Denver at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at San Diego, 4 p.m. (NBC)
Los Angeles Raiders at New England, 4 p.m.
Washington at Philadelphia, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Monday, Oct. 10
Minnesota at New York Giants, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week Seven
(Open Date: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, Seattle,
Tampa Bay)
Thursday, Oct. 13
Cleveland at Houston, 9 p.m. (ABC)
Sunday, Oct. 16
Arizona at Washington, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles Raiders at Miami, 1 p.m.
New England at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
New York Giants at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
Philadelphia at Dallas, 4 p.m. (FOX)
San Diego at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
Monday, Oct. 17
Kansas City at Denver, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week Eight
(Open Date: Buffalo, Miami, New England, New York Jets)
Thursday, Oct. 20
Green Bay at Minnesota, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Sunday, Oct. 23
Chicago at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles Rams at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Seattle at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Washington at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m.
Dallas at Arizona, 4 p.m. (FOX)
Denver at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Tampa Bay at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Monday, Oct. 24
Houston at Philadelphia, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week Nine
(Open Date: Atlanta, Los Angeles Rams, New Orleans, San
Francisco)
Sunday, Oct. 30
Dallas at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Detroit at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Miami at New England, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Washington, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Denver, 4 p.m.
Houston at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (NBC)
Minnesota at Tampa Bay, 4 p.m.
New York Jets at Indianapolis, 4 p.m.
Seattle at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Arizona, 8 p.m. (TNT)
Monday, Oct. 31
Green Bay at Chicago, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week 10
Sunday, Nov. 6
Chicago at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Detroit vs. Green Bay at Milwaukee, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Miami, 1 p.m.
New England at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Houston, 1 p.m. (NBC)
San Diego at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Washington, 1 p.m.
Arizona at Philadelphia, 4 p.m.
Buffalo at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
Cincinnati at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Denver at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
Los Angeles Raiders at Kansas City, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
Monday, Nov. 7
New York Giants at Dallas, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week 11
(Open Date: Indianapolis, Washington)
Sunday, Nov. 13
Arizona at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Chicago at Miami, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Houston at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at New England, 1 p.m.
San Diego at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Dallas at San Francisco, 4 p.m. (FOX)
Los Angeles Raiders at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
New York Jets at Green Bay, 4 p.m.
Seattle at Denver, 4 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Detroit, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
Monday, Nov. 14
Buffalo at Pittsburgh, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week 12
Sunday, Nov. 20
Cleveland at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Miami at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
San Diego at New England, 1 p.m.
Washington at Dallas, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Denver, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (FOX)
New York Jets at Minnesota, 4 p.m.
Philadelphia at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Los Angeles Rams at San Francisco, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
Monday, Nov. 21
New York Giants at Houston, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week 13
Thursday, Nov. 24
Buffalo at Detroit, 12:30 p.m. (NBC)
Green Bay at Dallas, 4 p.m. (FOX)
Sunday, Nov. 27
Houston at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
Miami ay New York Jets, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Chicago at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Cincinnati at Denver, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Los Angeles Rams at San Diego, 4 p.m.
New York Giants at Washington, 4 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (NBC)
New England at Indianapolis, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
Monday, Nov. 28
San Francisco at New Orleans, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week 14
Thursday, Dec. 1
Chicago at Minnesota, 9 p.m. (ABC)
Sunday, Dec. 4
Dallas at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at New England, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Washington at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Arizona at Houston, 4 p.m. (FOX)
Atlanta at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Denver at Kansas City, 4 p.m.
Indianapolis at Seattle, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
New York Giants at Cleveland, 4 p.m.
Buffalo at Miami, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
Monday, Dec. 5
Los Angeles Raiders at San Diego, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week 15
Saturday, Dec. 10
Detroit at New York Jets, 12:30 p.m. (FOX)
Cleveland at Dallas, 4 p.m. (NBC)
Sunday, Dec. 11
Chicago at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at New England, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles Rams at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Denver at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m.
San Francisco at San Diego, 4 p.m. (FOX)
Seattle at Houston, 4 p.m.
Washington at Arizona, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at Atlanta, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
Monday, Dec. 12
Kansas City at Miami, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week 16
Saturday, Dec. 17
Minnesota at Detroit, 12:30 p.m. (FOX)
Denver at San Francisco, 4 p.m. (NBC)
Sunday, Dec. 18
Atlanta vs. Green Bay at Milwaukee, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles Rams at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Miami at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
New England at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
San Diego at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Washington, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Houston at Kansas City, 4 p.m. (NBC)
New York Giants at Philadelphia, 4 p.m.
Los Angeles Raiders at Seattle, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
Monday, Dec. 19
Dallas at New Orleans, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Week 17
Saturday, Dec. 24
Arizona at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Buffalo at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Dallas at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
New England at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Seattle at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at Los Angeles Raiders, 4 p.m. (NBC)
New Orleans at Denver, 4 p.m.
New York Jets at Houston, 4 p.m.
Pittsburgh at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Washington at Los Angeles Rams, 4 p.m.
Sunday, Dec. 25
Detroit at Miami, 8 p.m. (ESPN)
Monday, Dec. 26
San Francisco at Minnesota, 9 p.m. (ABC)
------
Playoffs
Saturday, Dec. 31
AFC and NFC Wild Card (ABC)
Sunday, Jan. 1
AFC and NFC Wild Card (NBC and FOX)
Saturday, Jan. 7
AFC and NFC Divisional (NBC and FOX)
Sunday, Jan. 8
AFC and NFC Divisional (NBC and FOX)
Sunday, Jan. 15
AFC and NFC Championship (NBC and FOX)
Sunday, Jan. 29
Super Bowl at Miami (ABC)
Sunday, Feb. 5
Pro Bowl at Honolulu (ABC)
|
9.1748 | NFL News | DELNI::FORGET | | Tue May 17 1994 12:37 | 11 |
|
I read Sunday Globe and they said, the Raiders might move back to
Oakland, depending on with or not the LA Coliseum is ready
after the earthquake. Al Davis is be doing a tour of it in the
coming weeks.
Also yesterday on ESPN, the Jaguars are being sued by the Car company
on trademark rights.
Mike
|
9.1749 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Tue May 17 1994 12:45 | 8 |
| > Also yesterday on ESPN, the Jaguars are being sued by the Car company
> on trademark rights.
That would basically be Ford, because they own Jaguar now. I'm surprised
that they can trademark something so common.....
'Saw
|
9.1750 | BROWNS to take it all!!!! | BSS::J_VANMETER | | Wed May 18 1994 11:40 | 8 |
| no no no..... BROWNS & GIANTS in Super Bowl Next season!!!!!!!
BROWNS winning in a blow out......
its a given, bet the ranch........!
jeff
|
9.1751 | | CAMONE::WAY | Un-filtered Camels, Raw Beef, Coffee | Wed May 18 1994 12:02 | 14 |
| >
> no no no..... BROWNS & GIANTS in Super Bowl Next season!!!!!!!
>
> BROWNS winning in a blow out......
>
> its a given, bet the ranch........!
>
> jeff
I see that Robbie Bob's program to pass out daily rations of Prozac
has already hit Colorado Springs....
|
9.1752 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed May 18 1994 12:22 | 14 |
|
Yabbut is there anyway to close down the hailing frequencies
coming from da Springs??????
;^)
I remain,
thinkin jeff should have a p-name that says, "Dammit Jim, I'm a
comedian, NOT a_intellectual!!!!"
;^)
Kev
|
9.1753 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu May 19 1994 12:00 | 3 |
| Another reason for Doc to jump on the Vikes bandwagon: According to a
posting in the American Football notesfile, Minnesota has signed Andre
Ware.
|
9.1754 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Home of the driveby noter... | Thu May 19 1994 12:01 | 2 |
| Yup... he's looking to replace his Chuck Foreman jersey...
|
9.1755 | | CTHQ::LEARY | It'sBeenALongTimeComing... | Thu May 19 1994 12:25 | 3 |
| Now they git two Heisman winner QB's festering on the bench.
|
9.1756 | Inside Sports Top Twenty List? | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Wed Jun 01 1994 18:07 | 4 |
| Does anybody have the recent IS top twenty list for football
players? I'd love to see it.
Tony
|
9.1757 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Thu Jun 02 1994 09:47 | 8 |
| Anyone seen the lame commercials on FOX for football yet?
I'm wondering just how lame this season is going to be -- the image over
substance approach of FOX will probably mean that I'm doing less watching
and enjoying more of the Sunday afternoons this fall....
'Saw
|
9.1758 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Thu Jun 02 1994 10:21 | 16 |
|
> I'm wondering just how lame this season is going to be -- the image over
> substance approach of FOX will probably mean that I'm doing less watching
> and enjoying more of the Sunday afternoons this fall....
That's certainly not what Beevis and Butthead think........
;^)
Actually I'm looking forward to it. CBS' approached sucked imo. Bradshaw,
Madden and Lundquist were their saving graces........
mike
|
9.1759 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Thu Jun 02 1994 10:35 | 21 |
| >
> Actually I'm looking forward to it. CBS' approached sucked imo. Bradshaw,
> Madden and Lundquist were their saving graces........
>
This is true, but I'm not quite sure the circus that is Fox Broadcasting's
typical approach is going to do much for me, or a lot of other viewers.
I don't want flash, I don't want music video, I don't need to see
Martin Lawrence on the sidelines, or Sinbad in the lockerroom -- I just
want some football with some intelligent commentary.
If I want all that other stuff, there's other cable channels I can
find it on....
'Saw
|
9.1761 | fox nfl telecasts for nh audience question | AKOCOA::BREEN | Turn down the lights, the parties over | Thu Jun 02 1994 10:54 | 6 |
| anyone from nh know if fox can pick up the occassional nfc patriots
game without being blacked out? What town in nh has a fox outlet?
perhaps this will be moot if pats sell out
|
9.1762 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Thu Jun 02 1994 11:13 | 28 |
| > Er, Saw? Don't you watch Melrose Place on that same Fox network?
Once in a while.
I also watch "The X Files" and "Star Trek: The Next Generation"
Why would I think they'd have their comedy stars there? Well, perhaps
it's all those Sunday night lineups hosted by sports stars.
> there. No matter what, it still is only football and as long as
> they show video of the complete game what's the big deal if they
> put a couple of sparklers on it?
I think they'll at least have to show the complete game, or else folks
would be up in arms.
As to the sparklers, as long as it's in a commercial time period, when I
can go pee, no problem. But if they've got the Fly Girls boppin' around
while John Madden is trying to telestrate, then I might get annoyed.
And, just for the record, this is all POPB(tm),
'Saw
|
9.1763 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Thu Jun 02 1994 11:37 | 8 |
|
Only time the Pats would be on FOX is a home game against an NFC opponent.
That probably doesn't occur very often. In any case I would guess that
the Pats will probably sell out most, if not all, their home games. Or
they will be close enough that WBZ will buy the remaining tickets.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1764 | | MKFSA::LONG | Dancin' INSIDE the fire | Thu Jun 02 1994 11:46 | 12 |
| >> anyone from nh know if fox can pick up the occassional nfc patriots
>> game without being blacked out? What town in nh has a fox outlet?
In Merrimack, the local cable company carries Boston's FOX channel.
(25, I think)
As far as the Pats playing NFC team at home it happens four times
this season. Twice during preseason, New Orleans and Washington,
and twince during the regular season, Green Bay and Minnesota.
billl
|
9.1765 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Thu Jun 02 1994 11:55 | 7 |
| re: .1764
Pre-season is not usually on the networks but on channels like 56, if
it is televised at all.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1766 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Big Brown+lots of Kokanee | Thu Jun 02 1994 12:12 | 6 |
| I wouldn't think FOX will interupt $33mil dollar Madden. I'm sure
there 1st pre-game & post-game shows will have sirens and whistles.
Please tell me Bradshaw didn't go to FOX!
Tim
|
9.1767 | cable does me no good | AKOCOA::BREEN | Turn down the lights, the parties over | Thu Jun 02 1994 13:00 | 12 |
| the cable wouldn't do me any good because warner will black out nashua
if a boston station is involved.
I was hoping for a direct uhf antenna pickup. Possibly with a boston
blackout (25) one of the small southern nh uhf outlets might buy the
telelcast.
nh stations like 9 (abc) are good at carrying sports events as a
service to customers (who can always watch "the cat from outer space")
another time unlike boston station managers who I have conlcuded just
don't like sports and like to screw those who do whenever they have the
slightest ratings justification for doing so.
|
9.1768 | Waste of money | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Jun 02 1994 13:01 | 4 |
| What still confuses me about Fox: Why did they have to pay such
outlandish sums to Madden and Summerall? Didn't those guys need Fox
more than vice-versa? Fox should realize NFC games will get big ratings
no matter who aannounces.
|
9.1770 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Thu Jun 02 1994 13:15 | 6 |
|
Besides what Tommy said, NBC was also courting Madden that's why FOX
put up the bucks. Somerall I'm sure got a good offer to stay at CBS
and do golf etc but I assume football's his number 1 love so he jumped.
mike
|
9.1771 | | METSNY::francus | Rangers,Knicks,Mets in '94 | Thu Jun 02 1994 13:18 | 9 |
| ABC apparently also was in the hunt for Madden. For him to go to an
"upstart" FOX had to make it very much worth his while.
Summerall did a lot of things at CBS and was a well known broadcaster.
But he really hit the bigtime over the last few years when paired up
with Madden.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1772 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jun 02 1994 13:34 | 5 |
| �If I want all that other stuff, there's other cable channels I can
�find it on....
Yabbut you won't find the NY Giants on any of those other cable
channels.
|
9.1773 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:37 | 9 |
| > (and I think ridiculous) belief that Fox' broadcasts will be some
> sort of sideshow.
What has Fox ever shown that was substantive? Considering the rest
of their broadcasting has a sort of sideshow flair, why not make the
logical leap of faith that their football broadcasts would cater to the
same image over substance crowd that most of the rest of their programming
caters to?
|
9.1774 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:38 | 15 |
| |�If I want all that other stuff, there's other cable channels I can
|�find it on....
|
| Yabbut you won't find the NY Giants on any of those other cable
| channels.
Right.
Which is why I'll watch the Fox broadcasts and put up with whatever
bullshit goes along with it....
'Saw
|
9.1775 | Nobody watches announcers | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Jun 02 1994 14:44 | 9 |
| re: Fox and money.
Credibility was obtained by buying the dominant football conference in
the most popular sport while also getting the big marquee teams and
cities(SF,Dallas,Giants,Chicago etc).
What you guys are saying is that Madden is bigger than the game. I
think Fox would have gotten top ratings no matter who announced.
|
9.1777 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Thu Jun 02 1994 16:12 | 47 |
| > You said that you watch a handful of their shows.
Right. I watch a handful of their shows. That doesn't mean that I
haven't checked out a lot of their shows, and found them lacking. Which
is ultimately why I watch just a handful.
> Are you lumping
> yourself in that "image over substance crowd"?
I don't mind image if it accents something substantive. A symphony
conductor who is all flash, but doesn't have the fundamentals down and
doesn't get the sound out of all those musicians is worthless. However,
if the ear and musicianship are there, I can almost appreciate some of
the expressive flash.
> And how much substance
> do you expect from a football game? It's a friggin' game! It ain't
Fine, then give me THE GAME. I don't wanna see Howie Long, no matter how
much I like him, running down the hall like some fake-ass-cop-wannabe
on speed and steroids, doing his best COPS imitation to help the guy
outta football withdrawal.
I had to put of with TWO years of that I'm a big (insert your favorite
insult here) FAN crapoloa from CBS, and was hoping for something a bit
better.
> Upstairs Downstairs. The local Fox network here in Boston broadcasts
> Celtics games, I've yet to see any major differences between the way
> that they do the games and the way TV38, an independent station, used
> to do them other than better camera work. They certainly don't have
> bikini clad tootsies do half-time interviews.
Okay, I've never seen a Fox affiliate do sport. They don't do that down
here.
Hopefully the main network will follow suit...
'Saw
|
9.1778 | So who does have better camera work? | AKOCOA::BREEN | Turn down the lights, the parties over | Thu Jun 02 1994 16:52 | 4 |
| Tommy I didn't catch which of the stations (38 or 25) had the better
camera work? 38 always seemed to have good skills except for an
annoying habit in baseball games of always switching from the action to
show the actual touching of homeplate (even when the play was at 3rd).
|
9.1779 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Thu Jun 02 1994 17:04 | 12 |
| > annoying habit in baseball games of always switching from the action to
> show the actual touching of homeplate (even when the play was at 3rd).
ESPN has a similar annoying habit in hockey.
If the puck goes into the corner they cut there, even though a hit has
already been made, perhaps, or the puck is on its way away....
'Saw
|
9.1780 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Let me see shake yo tailfeather... | Thu Jun 02 1994 17:18 | 30 |
| From Doc...
1. Jim Brown - Led league in rushing 8 out of 9 seasons ...
2. LT - Redefined his position, and transformed the game ...
3. Jerry Rice - Will obliterate all receiving records by the time he's through.
4. Don Hutson - Staticstically dominated an era moe than anyone else has.
5. Joe Montana - Most accurate passer in history and ice in the big game.
6. Johnny Unitas - Like Montana ...
7. Otto Graham - 10 straight title games, 7 wins ...
8. Dick Butkus - Probably most intimdating player ever ...
9. Sammy Baugh - The best all-around player ever.
10. Walter Payon - Best all-around back.
11. O.J. - Most exciting back.
12. Joe Greene - Scared foes .. spit in face of Butkus, and he backed down ...
led Steelers D.
13. Dan Marino - On pace to shatter all passing records.
14. Bob Lily - Leader of Doomsday D.
15. Chuck Bednarik - Last of the great 60-minute players.
16. Gino Marcheti - Would be far and away all-time sack leader if stat was kept
...
17. Red Grange - Great runner, helped establish NFL.
18. Jim Parker - Best offensive lineman ever.
19. Mel Blount - Best pure CB, so good,he changed the rules.
20. Reggie White - Best DL since Joe Greene.
HONORABLE MENTIONS : Nagurski, Lambert, Mitschke, bradshaw, Munoz, Night Train
Lane, Staubach, Gregg, Lott, Page, Deacon Jones, Motely, Dickerson, Dorsett,
Groza, Thorpe, Sayers, and McElhenny.
Enjoy ...
|
9.1781 | | MKFSA::LONG | Dancin' INSIDE the fire | Thu Jun 02 1994 17:26 | 7 |
| Am I the only one who is flabergasted that Warren M-O-O-N
(that spells chokster) is not anywhere to be found on Dr 00:00's
list?
billl
|
9.1783 | | MKFSA::LONG | Dancin' INSIDE the fire | Thu Jun 02 1994 17:31 | 5 |
| With both Campbell and Moon missing this has got to be a fluke.
billl
|
9.1784 | Where's Mr Ed Elway ?? | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Jun 02 1994 17:42 | 6 |
| > With both Campbell and Moon missing this has got to be a fluke.
yea, well, without Bernadette Kosar on the list, Hal n Jeff are sure to be
upset.
Keith
|
9.1785 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Big Brown+lots of Kokanee | Thu Jun 02 1994 23:06 | 3 |
| brashaw was spelled like that
Tim
|
9.1786 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | They're handing out buckets, start bailing | Thu Jun 02 1994 23:54 | 7 |
| M-O-o_n, that spells "over-rated", laws yes.
JaKe
|
9.1787 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Here's yer bucket, start bailing!! | Fri Jun 03 1994 00:00 | 8 |
|
M-O-O-N, that spells "over-rated", laws yes.
JaKe
|
9.1788 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Fri Jun 03 1994 09:45 | 1 |
| I'm surprised Sam Huff wasn't an honorable mention.....
|
9.1789 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Fri Jun 03 1994 09:48 | 3 |
| Sam Huff was overrated. Probably because he played in New York.
/Don
|
9.1790 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Fri Jun 03 1994 09:52 | 6 |
| > Sam Huff was overrated. Probably because he played in New York.
He played in Washington too.
And more than anyone else, he had Big Jim Brown's numbah.....
|
9.1791 | Thoughts On Top 20 | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jun 03 1994 09:58 | 28 |
| I thought Deacon Jones should have cracked the top 20.
How many sacks did he have? I thought he was the most
feared defensive lineman of them all.
I had always heard of Bob Lilly and watched plenty of
football when he played, but was a kid and didn't really
study it. I wish I had really watched him play. Too bad.
Jerry Rice at #3. Quite an accolade and I fully support
it. By his second (or maybe it was his third) year in the
NFL, I truly thought he was the greatest end ever.
As a Packer fan, good to see Hutson so high. I read that
people who recently saw old films of him have stated that
he would have been murder to cover today.
I think Jim Brown's the best, but Sayer's yard/carry average
before his injury might even have been higher than Brown's
remarkable career 5.1. And Brown had a much better supporting
cast with his o-line, Frank Ryan at QB and Collins at end. I
believe Sayer's had a year at something like 5.6 or 5.8! Simply
amazing. I just liked Sayers the best. If I could only have film
clips of one football player, there would be absolutely no hesitation
on who it would be - Gayle Sayers. Without his injury, I might
have him cracking the top three even.
Tony
|
9.1792 | WHAT?!! | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:00 | 2 |
| I reread the list and I cannot believe Sayers did not make
the top twenty.
|
9.1793 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:10 | 11 |
| Interesting discussion.
For the brief period he played, I've never seen another football player like
Sayers. He was the focal point of every play that he was on the field. The
closest I've seen is OJ.
From my o-lineman and Packer-centric point of view, I would think that Jerry
Kramer should be mentioned, as well as John Hannah. I also think that Dick
Butkis was the greatest defensive player ever.
=Bob=
|
9.1794 | | MKFSA::LONG | Dancin' INSIDE the fire | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:14 | 10 |
| Yunz have to consider the source of this "list". Dr 00:00 has
been known to say things like, "Earl Campbell was the best in his day"
and "Moon is easily the best qb to play the game."
Why he then chooses to leave his #1 and #2 idols out of his "list"
is still a mystery.
billl
|
9.1795 | Are we sure that's Doc's list, and not Sport mag's again? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:23 | 1 |
|
|
9.1796 | | MKFSA::LONG | Dancin' INSIDE the fire | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:36 | 8 |
| >> Title: Are we sure that's Doc's list, and not Sport mag's again?
Considering the first line of .1780 says "from Doc". And each
of the tidbits following the names sound like his justification
of why they are rated where they are, I'd say it's his.
billl
|
9.1797 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Let me see shake yo tailfeather... | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:37 | 3 |
| It's Inside Sport's list, not Doc's...
|
9.1798 | Doc's too predictable for that... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 03 1994 10:42 | 10 |
|
> It's Inside Sport's list, not Doc's...
That's what I thought, since that's where Doc's hoops list came from.
I had a hard time believing that a couple of old Baltimore Colts'
legends like Gino Marchetti and Jim Parker would be making any list
of Doc's...
glenn
|
9.1799 | Another Packer-centric | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jun 03 1994 13:06 | 12 |
| re: .1795
I'm a Packer fan too. Correct me if I am wrong, but Kramer did
not even make the Hall of Fame, did he? Maybe he did..I'm not
sure. Notice the mention of Forrest Greg whom Lombardi called
the closest thing to a perfect football player he had ever seen.
The one other name that I came up with that didn't crack the
top 20 (besides Deacon Jones and Gayle Sayers) was John Hannah.
But, I honestly just don't know enough about offensive line.
Tony
|
9.1800 | Just Kidding | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jun 03 1994 13:09 | 2 |
| WHERE'S NORM BULAICH?!!! You mean Norm Bulaich didn't crack
the top 20??? :-)
|
9.1802 | Jim Brown was gawd | CTHQ::LEARY | It'sBeenALongTimeComing... | Fri Jun 03 1994 13:18 | 14 |
| Yeah,
Sam Huff had Jim Brown's number all right....the one on the
back of Brown's jersey that Huff's facemask was up agin
10 yards downfield..
But Huff had this to say about Brown.. When asked why Brown always
made it look like it was so tough for him to get back up and back
into the huddle, Huff retorted "Well if you think he had a tough time
gettin' up, you shoulda seen how tough it was takin' him down."
My money? Jim Brown and Gale Sayers above all.. Payton a little behind.
MikeL
|
9.1803 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Fri Jun 03 1994 15:33 | 3 |
| Whatever....
I ain't in the mood to argue it today.
|
9.1804 | More Bearz | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Jun 03 1994 17:01 | 3 |
| Red Grange shoulda made da' list...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.1806 | | CAMONE::WAY | Alas poor baldric | Mon Jun 06 1994 10:06 | 6 |
| >
> There's really nothing to argue about. Huff himself said that no
> one man could bring Jim Brown down just slow him up.
>
Whatever you say.....
|
9.1807 | IMO | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | Nymphing maniac | Mon Jun 06 1994 13:54 | 6 |
| Can't believe you didn't list/mention two of the 80's best WR's :
Steve Largent - skillful & the most intelligent reciever i've seen.
Mark Clayton - smooth professional
Davie.
|
9.1808 | So Many Other Receivers Though | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Mon Jun 06 1994 17:09 | 16 |
| re -1
I can see an argument for Largent, but Clayton's a reach.
I'd place the following above him (all receivers)
Paul Warfield
Bobbie Mitchell
Charley Taylor
James Lofton
Lynn Swann
Ahmad Rashad
Raymond Berry
There are just too many receivers I'd place over Clayton.
Tony
|
9.1809 | Huff meets Brown ... | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Wed Jun 08 1994 10:22 | 21 |
| I remember that when I was a kid many many moons ago, Sam Huff was invited to
speak at our local youth center.
I recall the following story that he told us:
The Giants were playing the Browns. On the first play Jim Brown tries to come
through the middle and Sam Huff lays him flat. As Sam is getting up off of
Brown, he says "Brown, you stink!"
The next play is Brown again trying to break over left tackle. Again, Huff is
there and floors Brown. As he gets up he says, "Brown, you stink".
The next time Brown gets the ball, he heads straight for Huff and breaks the
tackle. As Huff is laying empty handed on the ground, Jim Brown, on his way to
the goal line, turns around and yells. "Huff, how do I smell from here?"
Great story!!!
Thanks,
Cb.
|
9.1810 | No Campbell, Moon, or Pastorini! ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jun 10 1994 13:58 | 49 |
|
Oh yeah, I almost forgot; Doc was so flattered the other night that
everyone could be so interested in his personal all-time NFL team he
sent this along:
From: US1RMC::"[email protected]" 8-JUN-1994 14:05:07.73
p.p.s. Doc's All-Time Team (1960-present)
Post if ya want to :
WR - Rice,Maynard
TE - Winslow
T - Shell, B. Matthews
G - Upshaw, Hannah
C - Stephenson
QB - Staubach
RB - Brown, Simpson
3WR - Stallworth
3RB - Payton
2TE - Mackey
K - M. Anderson
Apologies : M. Webster, D. Casper, S. Jurgenson, J. Parker, J. Montana, A.
Monk, F. Bilentnkoff, E. Dickerson,
Ron Mix ..
Defense
DE - Reggie White, M. Olson
DT - J. Greene, A. Page
NT - C. Culp
MLB - Buktus
ILB - H. Carson
OLB - J. Ham
OLB - L. Taylor
CB - M. Blount, Night Train Lane
S - R. Lott, K. Houston
XDB - L. Barney (got to keep Walt quiet :-)
XDB - Jimmy Johnson
P - Ray Guy
Kick Returners - White Shoes Johnson and Rick Upchurch (I want to keep Sayers
healthy)
Special Teams - Jack Tatum
Let the arguments begin, heh heh heh ...
|
9.1811 | | MKFSA::LONG | Jumpin' gee hoser fats! | Fri Jun 10 1994 15:37 | 8 |
| I guess he really has disowned the Oilers. Only one I spotted in
there was "white shoes"Johnson.
A real closet Steeler fan, though.
billl
|
9.1812 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I'm digging your scene | Sun Jun 12 1994 11:52 | 2 |
| Matthews and Culp were Oilers at some point.
|
9.1813 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Jun 13 1994 13:14 | 3 |
| Nagurski and Grange... Forgotten ghosts... sigh...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.1814 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Wed Jun 15 1994 00:54 | 5 |
| LA Times reports that Simpson is the prime suspect in the death if his
wife.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1815 | (8^0* | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Wed Jun 15 1994 02:19 | 11 |
| I just saw the new Hertz commercial, it features OJ running thru an
airport, with police in chase, and the Juice is carrying a knife...
Actually, maybe that was one of Michael Jackson's gloves that they
found at OJ's house, and he and OJ was "experimenting", thus the blood
on the glove.
Nah
JaKe
|
9.1816 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Wed Jun 15 1994 12:29 | 5 |
| Frank Drubbin may have done it in an attempt to get OJ to switch from
Hertz to Dollar rent-a-car.
Sounds like OJ's in a heap o' trouble...
|
9.1817 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Yankees are an embarassment-GeorgeK | Wed Jun 15 1994 12:29 | 4 |
| Police say they will be charging someone in the next day or two. Does
not look too good for OJ.
brews
|
9.1818 | | CAMONE::WAY | The last full measure of devotion | Wed Jun 15 1994 12:30 | 11 |
| > Police say they will be charging someone in the next day or two. Does
> not look too good for OJ.
>
> brews
I'm no expert, but man, all the evidence is pointing one way......
8^(
|
9.1819 | | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Wed Jun 15 1994 13:07 | 7 |
| they need to get the results from tests they are doing on the bloodstained
glove. If it is the right blood type OJ is in real trouble.
But, from all the stuff I have heard all the evidence appears to
be circumstantial.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1820 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Jun 15 1994 13:09 | 10 |
|
Yabbut my money says it's a Bill Clinton conspiracy!
While Mrs. President was meeting with the heads of Europe, Bill was
chasin the ex-Mrs. OJ's skirt!
I remain,
thinkin OJ is being framed pretty well
Kev
|
9.1821 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 15 1994 13:55 | 5 |
| It's obvious that if this was Joe Q. Public, there would be no question
about his guilt. Only the fact that he's an NFL HoF'er makes us hope.
Supposedly there are scratches on his body too from the struggle. I
saw some film clips of his wife last night - she was a knockout.
|
9.1822 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Wed Jun 15 1994 14:06 | 4 |
| | It's obvious that if this was Joe Q. Public, there would be no question
| about his guilt. Only the fact that he's an NFL HoF'er makes us hope.
I've always admired your open-mindedness Mike...
|
9.1823 | well at least 1 of them | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 15 1994 14:08 | 1 |
| Thanks Bob, it's what I do best.
|
9.1824 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Jun 15 1994 14:46 | 8 |
| Bullshit, Mike.
Our whole legal process is predicated on the fact that one is innocent
until proven guilty. Sheesh, the guy hasn't even been arrested,
indicted nor convicted, and you already have him going to the chair.
Mark.
|
9.1825 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 15 1994 15:04 | 13 |
| > Our whole legal process is predicated on the fact that one is innocent
> until proven guilty. Sheesh, the guy hasn't even been arrested,
Why did the police have him in handcuffs if he was just being
questioned? Why was the matching blood-stained glove at his home? Why
is there blood on his driveway? Why is there blood in his car? Why
are there scratches on his body? If he didn't do it, he's the victim
of one helluva frame job!
> indicted nor convicted, and you already have him going to the chair.
No I don't. I'm just saying that appearances thus far don't look good
for him. The information thus far, if all true, says he's guilty.
|
9.1826 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Jun 15 1994 15:18 | 14 |
| No, "the information thus far" says there's blood on his driveway, blood
in his car, scratches on his body, etc. Nothing more, nothing less.
Even if there was *overwhelming* evidence against him, the state of CA
would still have to provide enough proof to get a jury to convict him.
I'm glad you're not on the jury.
Circumstantial does not mean overwhelming. People can go to great
lengths to stage "the perfect crime". Hell, Chuck Stuart even shot
himself.
Things are not necessarily as they appear.
Mark.
|
9.1827 | Funny Buisness going on ... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Jun 15 1994 15:48 | 12 |
| So lets say Mr X killed OJ's wife... How hard would it be to drive
accross town to OJ's home put some blood in his car/driveway leave
a glove hidden somewhere (Not hidden very well) and then leave town ?
The only thing that has potential is his scratches ? IF he has recent
scratches and she has skin samples under her fingernails he could be
in serious trouble.. The rest is circumstansial...
Of course I dont by this waiter to the home at midnight to deleiver a
pair of glasses :-)
mab
|
9.1828 | I hope it's not true but | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Jun 15 1994 16:04 | 9 |
| And in addition to everything said in the previous notes, OJ pleaded
"No Contest" in charges of beating his ex-wife a few months ago. Also, a
therapist of OJ's ex has said that she told him that OJ had threatened to
kill her on more than one occasion.
Ya gotta sit back and let the police do their job but if everything we hear
on the news media is true, it don't look too good fer the Juice.
Keith
|
9.1829 | | CAMONE::WAY | The last full measure of devotion | Wed Jun 15 1994 16:15 | 14 |
| Handcuffs are standard procedure when the police are doing the type
of investigation they did at his house the other day.
While it is humiliating to the handcuffee, the police won't take chances,
no matter who it is. The most unassuming, innocent looking people have
pulled knives, guns etc at moments when you'd never expect it.
So, they handcuff the people for everyone's safety.
Oh, by the way, I heard today there was no glove, just bloodstains.....
'Saw
|
9.1830 | | MKFSA::LONG | I was country when country wasn't cool | Wed Jun 15 1994 16:19 | 7 |
| >> but if everything we hear on the news media is true,
Quite the lead in!
billl
|
9.1831 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Wed Jun 15 1994 17:10 | 5 |
| Did the determine a time of death? Could he have enough time to do
this, drive home, drop the blood, change, and make a plan at LAX
in 45 minutes? They were guessing 11:00 and he had an 11:45 flight,
right?
|
9.1832 | Might have link to scene of the crime | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Thu Jun 16 1994 09:36 | 13 |
|
Some of the evidence is very circumstantial and so obvious. You
see blood here, blood there, and you wonder could anybody be so
stupid? If you look at it from a "frame job" point of view. A question
you have to ask is. How did they bypass the security system at OJ's
house?
As I'm typing this the radio just reported. There were 3 types of
blood found at the scene of the crime. Two match the murder victims,
the 3rd is the same type as OJ's. They are running DNA tests on the
blood against that taken from OJ. If it matches they can place him at
the scene of the crime.
Ron
|
9.1834 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Jun 16 1994 09:52 | 3 |
| If it took a legal conviction to say anything in public about
the likelihhood of guilt, then no one would have anything against
Richard Nixon.
|
9.1835 | Get facts straight | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Will edit for food | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:26 | 13 |
| OJ did NOT plead no contest to beating his wife a few months ago.
That took place in 1989, when theyt were still married.
The time of death has been placed at about 11:00 PM. Goldman left the
restaurant after 9:30 to bring the glasses to OJ's ex. OJ took a limo
to the airport and took an 11:45 flight. It may be tight, but there's
enough time in there to do the deed, drive home, and jump in the limo.
Still, it sounds like a frame-up to me. Why would he leave that glove
around? It's way too obvious.
NAZZ
|
9.1836 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:43 | 6 |
|
Didn't read the article, but the headline said that OJ has an alibi.
Said he was at his home.
Kevin
|
9.1837 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:45 | 4 |
| One theory is the killing happened at OJ's place, he dropped the bodies
off outside the condo, and came back or took the limo. Her place was
on the way to the airport. That would also explain the blood in the
driveway and in the car...
|
9.1838 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:45 | 22 |
| > The time of death has been placed at about 11:00 PM. Goldman left the
> restaurant after 9:30 to bring the glasses to OJ's ex. OJ took a limo
> to the airport and took an 11:45 flight. It may be tight, but there's
> enough time in there to do the deed, drive home, and jump in the limo.
Yeah, that's true, but man, he'd have had to be pretty cool. They said
that he was very relaxed when he got into the limo.
Assuming, for a second, that he just snapped and wipe the two of them
out, he'd still have had to be kind of pumped up and I'm sure that would
have been noticeable. He'd have to be one cool customer to be that
relaxed.
The last time I beat someone within an inch of their life it took me
a long time to calm down afterwards...
> Still, it sounds like a frame-up to me. Why would he leave that glove
> around? It's way too obvious.
I'm hearing reports now that there was no glove.
|
9.1839 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:53 | 24 |
| > One theory is the killing happened at OJ's place, he dropped the bodies
> off outside the condo, and came back or took the limo. Her place was
> on the way to the airport. That would also explain the blood in the
> driveway and in the car...
That one would be tough.
From what I've heard reported, Goldman or whatever his name was put up
one hell of a struggle. I saw the area at her house where the bodies
were found on a clip on TV last night -- I've seen pigs slaughtered and
flopping around that have left less blood than there was on that walkway.
His driveway was relatively clean compared to that, from all reports that
I've heard.
I discount the killed them at home and dropping them off. Besides, what
would Goldman or whatever his name was be doing at OJ's place... I don't
get it....
'Saw
|
9.1841 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:58 | 3 |
| Don't know. This came as a theory from someone I know at the Long
Beach Police Dept...
|
9.1842 | | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:59 | 4 |
| how is Sherri doing??
The Crazy Met
|
9.1843 | Wanna buy a bridge in Brooklyn? | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Thu Jun 16 1994 10:59 | 20 |
| |> The last time I beat someone within an inch of their life it took me
|> a long time to calm down afterwards...
|
| Huh? I actually laughed when I read this... didn't you say you were
| the most non-violent person you know?
a) I know some pretty violent people
b) I haven't always been non-violent
c) The a__hole deserved it
d) The therapy has worked wonders..... I'm good enough,
I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people are afraid
of me.
e) Never, NEVER, **EVER** take my beer from me....
|
9.1844 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Thu Jun 16 1994 11:01 | 8 |
| > Don't know. This came as a theory from someone I know at the Long
> Beach Police Dept...
Obviously she didn't check out the crime scene.
Tell her I said she should be ashamed of herself....8^)
|
9.1845 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu Jun 16 1994 11:03 | 11 |
| The latest I heard (this morning) on OJ, based on media reports:
o There was no glove found.
o His new lawyer released a chronology of OJ's actions for the night,
which places him waiting for his limo to the airport when the crime
was committed.
o Results of the DNA test won't be available for a couple months.
o It is expected that an indicment will happen in the next couple of
days.
=Bob=
|
9.1846 | | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Thu Jun 16 1994 11:05 | 7 |
| News report as I was driving in said that there was a glove; lawyer
for OJ denied it.
Also OJ's new lawyer will be using his old lawyer as a consultant.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1847 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Thu Jun 16 1994 14:08 | 14 |
| Careful Tommy, Lufay will get upset at you too for sending OJ to the
chair already.
One clarification: the blood at the scene of the crime is OJ's *TYPE*.
There are probably millions with the same type as him, including his
kids who lived in the house. DNA testing will take 2 months to
determine if it's actually his blood.
Here's a couple tough things to consider:
- California has the death penalty (done by lethal injection). If
convicted, OJ may be facing this.
- If convicted, do you think he should remain in the HoF?
|
9.1848 | | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Thu Jun 16 1994 14:14 | 10 |
|
> If convicted, do you think he should remain in the HoF?
absolutely! I also happen to believe that Pete Rose and Shoeless Joe
Jackson should be in the HoF.
Players should get into the HoF based on what they did on the field.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1849 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu Jun 16 1994 14:56 | 9 |
|
|> If convicted, do you think he should remain in the HoF?
|absolutely! I also happen to believe that Pete Rose and Shoeless Joe
|Jackson should be in the HoF.
|Players should get into the HoF based on what they did on the field.
I actually agree with TCM here...
|
9.1850 | same for Rose and Jackson | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:00 | 1 |
| I agree too, just wanted to see what others thought.
|
9.1851 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:01 | 8 |
| � The last time I beat someone within an inch of their life it took me
� a long time to calm down afterwards...
Betcha that's the last time those pesky Girl Scouts pushed any
of those overpriced cookies on you! So is it safe to assume that OJ has
supplanted Korea as the top story?
/Don
|
9.1852 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:09 | 4 |
| She's in a class this week so she hasn't been able to do the
investigating.... she's fine... she's talking about swinging east
in August...
|
9.1853 | What do the experts think... | KALVIN::MORGAN | | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:25 | 3 |
| Should OJ's number still be proudly displayed at Rich Stadium?
Steve
|
9.1854 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:28 | 3 |
| Hey, if it was A Pos blood, I could have done it....
/Don, it wasn't a girl scout, it was an ex-con who took my beer one night ;^)
|
9.1855 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:36 | 3 |
| Steve, should his number be taken down until he's had a trial first?
|
9.1856 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Thu Jun 16 1994 15:52 | 5 |
| � /Don, it wasn't a girl scout, it was an ex-con who took my beer one night ;^)
I didn't know the Reverend Jim Baker had made parole...
/Don
|
9.1858 | was in Soapbox too | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Thu Jun 16 1994 16:31 | 1 |
| I've heard the same, Tommy.
|
9.1859 | $$$ doesn't buy happiness eh? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Welcome to the Machine | Fri Jun 17 1994 09:07 | 12 |
| I heard the limo driver said O.J. was late and when he did show up
that he was sweating.
The media has him convicted already and he hasn't even been arrested
yet.
From all this flaky evidence leaked thru the media, it sounds like a
frame. If not, then the old saying that maybe he took one too many
hits to the head. Your average person isn't as stupid enough to "set
himself up" unless thats what he wanted.
Tim
|
9.1860 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jun 17 1994 13:17 | 7 |
| On the radio this morning, I heard that the limo driver told the police that
he waited a half hour at OJ's house with no indication that anyone was home.
Also, the police think they have the murder weapon which was found in OJ's
house. They also said something about a mask being recovered. An arrest
or an indictment by a grand jury is imminent.
Keith
|
9.1861 | | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jun 17 1994 13:23 | 8 |
| Too many hits to the head? Yup, but not the kind you get on the
football field.
Rumors are circulating fast-and-furious that O.J. had some big-time
substance abuse problems, which would easily explain away his "stupidity".
- ACC Chris
|
9.1862 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 17 1994 13:46 | 6 |
| He was framed so good, the framer put scratches on the framee.
Police are saying they have enough to bust him now, just giving him a
day to confess.
Supposedly the weapon has been found.
|
9.1863 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jun 17 1994 13:52 | 3 |
| Younze guys who think he's being framed have been watching too much TeeVee.
Keith
|
9.1864 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Fri Jun 17 1994 14:42 | 12 |
| Dr. Henry Lee, the State of Connecticut Medical Examiner (and a world
reknowned forensics expert) has been retained by OJ's attorney.
Lee will be working on the case using his vacation time, and any profit
he makes will be donated to the Ct State Dept of Public Safety and
a scholarship fund at UConn.
If OJ *is* being framed, Lee is the guy who can find that out. He's
an amazing man.....
'Saw
|
9.1865 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Fri Jun 17 1994 14:50 | 5 |
|
OJ has been charged.
Kevin
|
9.1866 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 17 1994 14:58 | 3 |
| Yup, it's official - charged on 2 counts of murder. CNN is now reporting
a second suspect. OJ is scheduled to make a statement within the next 2
hours.
|
9.1867 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Fri Jun 17 1994 14:58 | 6 |
| >
> OJ has been charged.
>
Yes. Our radio reports that there are TWO suspects! Go figure.....
|
9.1868 | more on OJ's charges | HBAHBA::HAAS | Ate a hot dog, made me feel good | Fri Jun 17 1994 15:17 | 14 |
| Latest, as it happens:
The LAPD have confirmed the CNN report that OJ has been charged with the
2 murders. They are denying the part about the second suspect and are
saying that there are no other suspects, at least not now. CNN continues
to talk about a second suspect, nonetheless.
OJ will be arraigned at 5pm today and he is either in custody or on his
way to surrendering with his lawyer.
And now, CNN is working the angle that he's black and she's white, like
this aint screwed up enough already.
TTom
|
9.1869 | no bail for OJ; possible death | HBAHBA::HAAS | Ate a hot dog, made me feel good | Fri Jun 17 1994 15:26 | 6 |
| Another update.
The charges against OJ qualify for consideration of the death penalty.
And, meanwhile, OJ is being held *WITHOUT* bail.
TTom
|
9.1870 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Jun 17 1994 16:38 | 5 |
| I wonder what Swonger has to say 'bout this...
I think he's in AMERICAN_FOOTBALL at times...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.1871 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 17 1994 17:10 | 12 |
| From watching the Menendez Brothers trial on TV I remember hearing that in
California if a jury finds that a murder is premeditated they can find that
it was murder in the 1st degree. If a jury finds that a 1st degree murder was
committed with "special circumstances", then the judge can order the death
penalty.
One of the criteria for "special circumstances" is a multiple murder.
The Juice is in trouble.
:*({
George
|
9.1872 | the Juice is Loose! | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 17 1994 18:11 | 1 |
| OJ hasn't shown up! He's probably in Mozambique by now.
|
9.1873 | Maybe he will bleach like MJ? | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Welcome to the Machine | Fri Jun 17 1994 19:45 | 6 |
| Since the charges have been filed, I am assuming that the DNA results
showed that it twas the juice man...That to me would be the evidence
to actually arrest him. Typically the fuzz won't file charges unless
they have some concrete evidence to try and convict a person.
Tim
|
9.1874 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jun 17 1994 19:57 | 15 |
| > to actually arrest him. Typically the fuzz won't file charges unless
> they have some concrete evidence to try and convict a person.
ABC had some retired NYC homicide detective on the air. He said that
since the Juice is/was a celebrity and since he's got a lot of high priced
lawyers, they would be extra careful before issuing an arrest warrant.
If this wus an average guy, he wouldda been in the slammer a lot sooner.
And now, they finally issue the warrant and since he's a celebrity, they
call him up and ask him to turn himself in. He says sure, I'll be there
in half an hour and then skips town. If they really think he wus the guy
who brutally sliced those two people up, they shouldda gone to his house
with their guns drawn and then dragged him out in chains.
Keith
|
9.1875 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Welcome to the Machine | Sat Jun 18 1994 09:28 | 13 |
| What a joke last night. The media circus covering the OJ ford
Bronco through the city and waisting air time covering a suicidal man
just sitting in the Bronco.
I walked in after he was already sitting in his driveway for an
hour, and the wife says this has been on a while, then she wouldn't let
me turn the channel (wanted to watch the end of the BBall game). I
watched for ~ 30 mins and fell asleep on the Lazy boy.
Then there were all those people crowding outside his home. Those
people need to get a life!!
Tim
|
9.1876 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Sat Jun 18 1994 10:19 | 8 |
|
Plus there were thousands of people on the freeways, waving and
cheering? Hard to believe people would be cheering?
Chap
|
9.1877 | For O.J. | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Sat Jun 18 1994 12:35 | 10 |
|
Song of the day.
"Highway to Hell"
Chap
|
9.1878 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Mon Jun 20 1994 08:53 | 3 |
| Seems to me that I heard that DNA testing takes weeks, not days.
Lee
|
9.1879 | | CAMONE::WAY | Farewell #11 | Mon Jun 20 1994 09:45 | 8 |
| > Seems to me that I heard that DNA testing takes weeks, not days.
Yes, DNA testing takes several weeks.
They're going, among other things, on the basis of matching blood types....
'Saw
|
9.1880 | A dream shattered | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Jun 20 1994 12:08 | 37 |
| For me, the biggest tragedy in sports was when Roberto Clemente's
plane crashed in the Caribean. But what I witnessed Friday night on TV
was much, much worse. I was totally appalled watching people shout "Go
Juice Go". What if you were a friend or relative of the 2 people who were
butchered and happened to watch what was going on ? I could understand
people being curious and stopping to watch but the circus atmosphere was
sickening.
I have a great deal of compassion for the freinds and relatives of the 2
people slain and for the whole Simpson family for they are all truely
innocent and victims of a horrible crime. But if OJ is guilty, I have no
compassion in my heart.
I'm about the same age as OJ. I remember watching him at USC and knew he was
something very special. All through his college and pro career, he always
played with dignity and style. You never saw him showboating after a TD or
taunting another player or fighting or any of the other things I find so
repulsive with many modern athletes. I remember when he gained over 250
yards against my beloved Steel Curtain Defense. I didn't hate or dislike
him, I could only marvel at the artistry of a great, great football player.
For almost 3 decades, the Juice has been on TV and after a while, you almost
felt like you knew him. With this whole thing coming down, I feel like
it's happening to friend or a cousin or somebody I knew at work. Whenever
I see the Trojan ride his horse into the stadium, I'll never feel the same.
My God, what has our Sports world and society come to ? Did anyone else watch
NBC's split screen broadcast. On one side you could watch the Knicks and
Rockets mug each other while on the other screen you could watch the cops
following OJ's Bronco while he had a loaded gun to his head.
If I could say something to OJ, I would say this. "If you're not guilty,
then fight the charges with everything you've got. If you're guilty, tell
the truth and you'll gain a small amount of respect and you'll be able to
sleep better. But you should also realize that you can never walk to streets
of America as a free man".
Keith
|
9.1881 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 20 1994 12:34 | 75 |
| > For me, the biggest tragedy in sports was when Roberto Clemente's
> plane crashed in the Caribean. But what I witnessed Friday night on TV
> was much, much worse. I was totally appalled watching people shout "Go
> Juice Go". What if you were a friend or relative of the 2 people who were
> butchered and happened to watch what was going on ? I could understand
> people being curious and stopping to watch but the circus atmosphere was
> sickening.
I've seen a lot of tragedy in sports in my lifetime (and I'm only 35),
from the massacre at Munich, the terrible spectator deaths at Wembley,
car crashes in auto racing, Thurmon Munson, the aforementioned Clemente....
Friday night, I was watching the basketball game, one of the few times
I've watched hoops all year, when my Mom called and said "turn on
channel 3".
For the next bunch of hours I watched the pursuit.
> I have a great deal of compassion for the freinds and relatives of the 2
> people slain and for the whole Simpson family for they are all truely
> innocent and victims of a horrible crime. But if OJ is guilty, I have no
> compassion in my heart.
All I could feel was sad.
Sad for OJ, sad for his family and the families of the deceased. Sad for
everyone.
Even if OJ is guilty, I still feel compassion. I don't know why, but I
do.
> My God, what has our Sports world and society come to ? Did anyone else watch
> NBC's split screen broadcast. On one side you could watch the Knicks and
> Rockets mug each other while on the other screen you could watch the cops
> following OJ's Bronco while he had a loaded gun to his head.
Our society is one really f___ed up place. Everyone has an axe to grind,
everyone feels they have the right to impose their will on everyone else,
personal freedoms are shrinking.
The high-technology of the media have made any "celebrity's" life hell.
In the old days, the days of newsreels and print media, sports writers would
temper their pieces with compassion -- right or wrong it was what was done
I think.
The media reminds me of that song by Don Henley -- Dirty Laundry.
I watched Dan and Connie -- I have never seen two more stupid individuals.
I'm surprised Dan Rather ever made it through the Marine Corps, because
anyone with two eyes and half a brain could have seen the person in
the white t-shirt ran through the gate just behind the Bronco.
Just an example of how dumb folks in the media have become....
> If I could say something to OJ, I would say this. "If you're not guilty,
> then fight the charges with everything you've got. If you're guilty, tell
> the truth and you'll gain a small amount of respect and you'll be able to
> sleep better. But you should also realize that you can never walk to streets
> of America as a free man".
If OJ did it, he deserves to get what any other regular Joe would get
under the circumstances....
All I can say is that this is really sad......
'Saw
|
9.1882 | | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | OJ tackled on highway of reality | Mon Jun 20 1994 12:56 | 2 |
|
|
9.1883 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Jun 20 1994 12:57 | 3 |
| Wasn't Barbara Walters a piece of work?
Mark.
|
9.1885 | ABC | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:03 | 3 |
| Did anyone hear that Howard Stern caller on ABC's feed? During these
live broadcasts,you really find out which commentators have anything
upstairs.
|
9.1887 | Go Juice, Go. (Go Directly to Jail, Do Not Pass Go.) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:13 | 9 |
| Yea, I heard the ABC feed. With a choper hovering directly overhaid, I
wonder exactly what kind of "insight" they were expecting from a
neighbor who was supposedly looking out his window?
That Barbara Walters, .... what a piece of work. (Al Michaels has
class and perspective though, IMO.)
- ACC Chris
|
9.1888 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:17 | 21 |
| > That Barbara Walters, .... what a piece of work. (Al Michaels has
> class and perspective though, IMO.)
I didn't watch the ABC feed.
Al Michaels however, never fails to impress. Ever since his coverage of the
earthquake during the WS, I've never thought of his as just a sportscaster...
Dan and Connie took the cake however. While their local (LA) affiliate
was running audio from scanners picking up police broadcasts and there
was excellent commentary from local reporter Bob Tur in the chopper, Dan
and Connie kept running the most insipid dialog, interspersed with
Cardashian reading OJ's letter....
CNN (which my mom was watching) had them scooped on EVERYTHING that took
place in the yard, up until just before the cops said everything was
all clear.....
Dan and Connie suck......
|
9.1889 | I don't understand | VAOP28::Rice | It can't happen here | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:23 | 20 |
|
I think I've been out of the States too long - I'm missing
something here....
Why is this so important? Why would anybody want to watch a
car driving down the freeway? There are manhunts and fugitives
being chased every day by the hundreds - what's the big deal?
NBC will televise the arraignment LIVE! Why would anybody
want to watch? From a Canadian perspective this whole thing
is totally insane. Innocent or guilty, OJ has some problems.
Let the man be.....this is not like the Cuban Missile Crisis....
My feeling was that the media was *praying* for OJ to blow
his brains out on national TV. How sick is that? Why else would
they cut away from the 4th quarter of the championships to focus
on a van hidden by a tree? This is too weird for words.
josh
|
9.1890 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:28 | 20 |
| >
>My feeling was that the media was *praying* for OJ to blow
>his brains out on national TV. How sick is that? Why else would
>they cut away from the 4th quarter of the championships to focus
>on a van hidden by a tree? This is too weird for words.
Oh, no doubt. Ratings would have SOARED if OJ had pulled the
trigger on that gun and splattered his frontal lobe all over the
windows of that Bronco.
The media today is rife with the Image over Substance thing.
While the networks are not to the level of Weekly World News and the
National Enquirer, but it is quickly moving in the direction of
Hard Copy and Inside Edition.....
JMHO,
'Saw
|
9.1891 | Forget the facts, it's now important what media celebs *feel* | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:34 | 24 |
|
> My feeling was that the media was *praying* for OJ to blow
> his brains out on national TV. How sick is that? Why else would
> they cut away from the 4th quarter of the championships to focus
> on a van hidden by a tree?
This was *real* weak. As the Boston Globe described it, NBC
nonetheless came out of the whole affair as the big winner because
they got to show some basketball game, the more compelling parts of
the OJ drama, and a whole bunch of commercials in between. In the
interests of hard "journalism", the other networks didn't have this
luxury.
I guess Al Michaels got knocked around pretty good for some heavy OJ
apologism in his interviews on Saturday, in spite of his performance
on Friday night. I find it hard to believe that he could have outdone
Will McDonough, though, who yesterday made a very damning insinuation
that (as OJ had personally told him) there are two sides to this
continued history of wife abuse, but then refused to elaborate, just
leaving the matter hanging. Again, more high-caliber journalism at
work...
glenn
|
9.1892 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:39 | 32 |
| > that (as OJ had personally told him) there are two sides to this
> continued history of wife abuse, but then refused to elaborate, just
Well, I can't speak to the OJ incident, but I have some friends who work
in this area as social workers or counselors or whatever you want to call
them.
There usually are two sides to a story, and while there ARE a lot (most
perhaps) cases where it's just a case of a guy who thinks it's okay to
beat up on a woman (with the classic line "Don't make me hit you"), there
are cases of woman instigating it and hitting first or precipitating the
incident.
I know it's probably not politically correct to mention that these days,
because on the PC scale men (all men) are pretty far down at the
bottom of the food chain, but it is true.
Perhaps that is what Will was referring to in his interview, which
I haven't seen.
And hey, let's not forget the fact that America has always had this
perverse little love affair with the criminal, the "underdog" as it were,
the bad boy, that you want to see escape the web. Bonnie and Clyde,
Dillinger, the James Gang.... I mean, there's always been a fascination
and a "rooting for" the bad guys in our society....
'Saw
|
9.1893 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:48 | 10 |
| What bothers me about this whole thing (beyond the obvious)
is that the LAPD had OJ and let him go. Now, if it had been
any normal human, LAPD would have had them in a cell faster
than a New York minute.
If OJ had killed himself (and/or someone else), I would expect
a huge hue and cry about the way the LAPD folks handled this
fiasco.
Scott
|
9.1894 | Burn down his house & hit him 50 times - then charge Andre! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:49 | 9 |
| re: two sides to a story ....
Shortly after Andre Rison's house got burned down buy his "girl friend"
(some friend) she laid claim that Andre had "beaten" her. When axed
about this Andre, in a moment of dispirited candor, said that yes, he
did slap her once - after she'd slapped him "about 50 times".
- ACC Chris
|
9.1895 | Way Cool\ | AD::HEATH | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:54 | 11 |
|
re about the James Gang....
Saw what does Rock and Roll have anything to do with the rest of those
criminals. :*)
Jerry
|
9.1896 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:55 | 3 |
| I was watching the procedeedings sans sounds at Matthews. Most of
the sports bar was looking for the game and got sucked in. I wound
up watching most of the time with Terri, Ms. Southern California '93.
|
9.1897 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 20 1994 13:59 | 8 |
|
All of those anecdotes are well and good, boys, but my problem with
McDonough's article was not that he raised the insinuation but that he
didn't have the guts to fill in the blanks. He just wafted it out
there for the public imagination to run wild with...
glenn
|
9.1898 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:03 | 5 |
| I figure McDonough's article was no worse than some "expert"
psychologist telling us that O.J.'s farewell letter exhibited all the
classic signs of a wife beater.
/Don
|
9.1899 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:08 | 14 |
|
> I figure McDonough's article was no worse than some "expert"
> psychologist telling us that O.J.'s farewell letter exhibited all the
> classic signs of a wife beater.
No worse, and no better. All of the armchair psychoanalysis is
sickening. But it's still a fact that O.J. is a convicted wife
abuser, and all of the rationalization in the world doesn't change
that. Considering the criminal record and the ultimate result, I find
it pretty hard to swallow that there could be some kind of sufficient
mitigating explanation for it all...
glenn
|
9.1900 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:09 | 4 |
| I thought Mike Barnicle's column was quite good (and I'm no big fan of
his).
Mark.
|
9.1901 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:14 | 14 |
| I also wasn't too happy about the fact that the LAPD didn't take precautions
for an escape. But this is the same LA justice system which brought
us the first Rodney King verdict, a police chief who pretended there was no
police brutality, the Reginal Denny verdict and the Menedez verdict.
This is a city where justice has been turned upside down and inside out.
Now we're faced with another high profile trial and a media feeding
frenzy.
I really hope this doesn't go to trial. If the Juice is guilty, I hope he
does the right thing and says so. LA and the whole country does not
need another high profile agonizing trial where the only ones who make
out are the lawyers and the media sharks.
Keith
|
9.1902 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:15 | 9 |
| I pretty much agree with what's been said. The media is disgusting,
regardless of his guilt or innocence.
Spousal abuse is pretty much irrelevant here since they divorced in
1991. The only way it could possibly play a part depends on what plan the
defense has (probably temporary insanity).
It was truly sad to see, and I still hope he's innocent, but I severely
doubt it.
|
9.1903 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:16 | 6 |
| � that. Considering the criminal record and the ultimate result, I find
Now while Simpson has been found guilty in the court of public opinion,
I would wait until it is official before making the above connection.
/Don
|
9.1904 | | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:38 | 20 |
| I found the whole fiasco Friday night disgusting! I was at a
graduation party and happened into the living room where everyone
was entranced by the TV. All I saw was this white Ford Bronco
going down the road, followed by a line of black&whites.
I asked the closest person what the parade was for. He said it
was the LAPD 'escorting' OJ home. I was then told it had been
going on for quite some time.
I was appauled that the American news media would waste airtime
on this crap. I was even further appauled that people I knew
would stand there staring at this for over an hour. Maybe I'm
in the minority, but I don't care. This is pure crap and anyone
who finds this mildly entertaining, enough to watch it, needs to
do a serious self exam of their idea of what they find newsworthy.
I feel much better now,
billl
|
9.1905 | there are 2 sides to every story | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:44 | 9 |
| Did I mention that Al Michaels went to ASU?
Something VERY interesting that everyone seems to be ignoring:
Yesterday's paper stated that the States' primary witness is pleading
the 5th Amendment unless he/she's granted immunity.
This sort of confirms the rumors last week about a 2nd suspect and
certainly thickens the plot.
|
9.1906 | Entertainment? hardly... | VAOP28::Rice | It can't happen here | Mon Jun 20 1994 14:52 | 10 |
| > I was appauled that the American news media would waste airtime
> on this crap. I was even further appauled that people I knew
> would stand there staring at this for over an hour. Maybe I'm
The second point is what puzzles me. The media will play anything that
sells, pure and simple. They have negative ethics (like the Knicks;).
But why does this sell?!?!?!? The American public is *supporting* this
coverage, big time, or they wouldn't be televising the arraignment.
josh
|
9.1907 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:06 | 5 |
| Made for tv movie mentality for you... And tell me if this was made
for one and the cop says "He went in, called his mom, went to the
rest room and drank some ORANGE JUICE" you'd think that was the greatest
twist in cinema and worthy of an Emmy...
|
9.1908 | It was very ridiculous... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:13 | 28 |
| I could not BELEIVE they interupted the game to watch a bronco driving
down the Highway, I spent most of the time Channel Surfing for anything
to watch, About 30 seconds into the Bronco Chase you knew everything
and they should have switched back to the game...
CHASE, MANHUNT, What chase, what manhunt, did I miss something, he
never left the city and the chase was at a whopping 30-45mph... ???
And isnt LA a High Crime Rate city ??? Whey do they need 30 Cars and
3-5 HeliCoptors to catch one ACCUSED Criminal driving at 40MPH ??? Id
hate to know how many other crimes occured during that same time frame
when who knows how many police personal were wasted on this.. If 2 Cars
couldnt have followed him and kept up at 45MPH they need to retrain
them all...????
I couldnt beleive all the hoopla.. Poeple sorrounded his house for HRS
just waiting, I think people in here are right the Media and the people
all waiting around outside were proberbly there to witness his suicide
WHAT A COUNTRY... Id love to say Only in LA but Ive seen the same thing
at car accidents and House fire's people all blocking the
roads/sidewalks trying to get a glimps of someone else's misfortune ?
2 people died, one may have been a complete innocent bystander and of
course neither deserved it... OJ will try to plead Insanity, or plea
barging down the charges to not get juiced.... Or well have a 2 year
trial and 4 made for TV movies (ABC, NBC, CBS and now FOX)...!!!!
MaB
|
9.1909 | bank on it | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:19 | 3 |
| Re: Brooks
If it comes to that, OJ simply will not get capital punishment.
|
9.1910 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:19 | 3 |
| Then we can start picking out roles... Levar Burton... Bernie Casey,
Kim Basinger (just finished watching "The Natural" again...) the Federal
Express guy or Jon Lovitz as the police chief.
|
9.1911 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:20 | 2 |
| Any update on the arraignment?
|
9.1912 | hasn't happened yet | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:22 | 1 |
| Not for another 10 minutes.
|
9.1913 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 20 1994 15:39 | 37 |
| re the chase:
If you knew anything at all about police work, you'd have realized
that what was happening was that most of the cars (save for the
half-dozen that started trailing him) had been closing down
exit ramps and then rejoining after the "parade" passed by.
Why so many? Why couldn't two have handled it?
Well, let's see. Perhaps the police didn't know that OJ was
going home. He might have said he was, but they didn't know
that. What else...hmmm, they could have possibly made a
break for it. Two cars don't handle that, not the way they
do it in California.
Two cars? Suppose OJ makes Al stop the Bronco, jumps out and is
starts waving the gun around, or starts shooting bystanders, or
even Al himself?
Bottom line, LA is understaffed with police anyway, so even
if they called OJ on his cellular phone and said "Okay, Juice,
we're giving you the benefit of the doubt, we'll meet you at
your house, and oh, btw, could you stop and pick us up some
chicken wings on the way", crimes still would have been
committed.
But, bottom line, OJ had an arrest warrant for a double murder
charge. Probably the only thing that will get a PD more
mobilized would have been if OJ was accused of killing a cop.
That simple. The police HAVE to make the assumption, based
on the charges, that he may have killed, and may kill again,
therefore, all pressure available is brought to bear.
Just a few tidbits to help your understanding,
'Saw
|
9.1914 | A circus, yes. High quality entertainment? Definitely. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Jun 20 1994 16:06 | 11 |
| Say what you will about the absurdity of it all, but there can be no
doubt that the OJ chase was big-time high drama. We're talkin' 'bout
one of the greatest American athletes EVER caught up in the midst of an
almost unbelievable murder investigation who *escapes* and is being
tracked down on live TV!
The thought of someone being more interested in the Knicks/Rockets
fiasco boggles my mind.
- ACC Chris
|
9.1915 | Definate Overkill | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jun 20 1994 16:07 | 5 |
| They Had a few Helicoptors in pursuit as well, I just think it was
too over hyped, too many cops, too much media, too many bystanders.
They should have cleared out the whole area, and most of the media.
MaB
|
9.1916 | not guilty | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 20 1994 16:10 | 12 |
| OJ pleaded NOT GUILTY. He looked very somber and like he had't slept
since Friday - basically looked like hell. More conferences should be
expected later by both the prosecution and defense.
BTW - Shapiro was pretty sharp and kept the prosecutor on the run
during the whole time. For instance, he stated how disappointed he was
in the police report for only being 25 pages long. The state's excuse
was that things happened so fast that they're still compiling it. It
was pretty much like this in several areas, all of which Shapiro
highlighted.
Mike
|
9.1917 | yawn | VAOP28::Rice | It can't happen here | Mon Jun 20 1994 16:19 | 7 |
| > Big-time high drama.
Really? Like I said, I must be too long gone from
the States, cuz I don't get it. It's a modern tragedy
and all, but live TV? Wow. I'd rather watch curling.
josh
|
9.1918 | In the year 2020 we'll ask "Where were you win OJ ran?" | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Jun 20 1994 16:34 | 10 |
| > I'd rather watch curling.
Yea, that's why all three (3) networks, plus CNN, plus Headline NEWS,
plus ESPN, .... all joined in on the live coverage.
This story might not have played outside the U.S., but here in "the
States" it was about as big as it gets.
- ACC Chris
|
9.1919 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 20 1994 17:13 | 18 |
| >
> They Had a few Helicoptors in pursuit as well, I just think it was
> too over hyped, too many cops, too much media, too many bystanders.
> They should have cleared out the whole area, and most of the media.
>
Most of the helicopters were media.
The ones doing the over hyping were the media, I'll give you that.
But let me ask you this -- there's a fugitive from justice loose in your
neighborhood, which puts you, your wife, and your kids at peril. How
many cops is too many?
'Saw
|
9.1920 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Mon Jun 20 1994 17:14 | 2 |
| Should OJ get his own topic at this point?
|
9.1921 | From the Mickster.... | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Mon Jun 20 1994 17:21 | 35 |
| >
> Should OJ get his own topic at this point?
>
Nah, there's not that much other football going on.
From MIke Leary:
a) Orange Juice? Orange Juice? Hell, they should call him
tomato juice based on all the blood he left behind.
b) Bet he wishes he was Irish now, he'd have been so drunk
that he couldn't have beaten anyone up, let alone kill 'em
c) St. Patrick got him back.
On a SERIOUS note from Mike:
He feels sad about the Juice and the whole tragedy
with the kids and everything, and wanted to express
that here in notes...
'Saw
PS He told me he was really at Yellowstone last week -- really, he said
he was.....8^)
PPS He said if anyone dislikes his comments, they can call him
at 617-662-2639
|
9.1922 | | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Mon Jun 20 1994 17:41 | 8 |
| >> This story might not have played outside the U.S., but here in "the
>> States" it was about as big as it gets.
This, my friend, is the absurdity of it all.
billl
|
9.1923 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Jun 20 1994 18:01 | 22 |
| No offense guys, but you sound Digital Marketing folks. ;-)
EVERYONE, (including myself) that I knew, be they at work or at home,
was glued to their sets watching the Bronco roll down the highway.
Any station not smart enough to have picked that up ain't a sound
business.
The fact is, most of us are to blame for the fact that the media hyped
it up. I'll bet if one station carried the event, it would have killed
(including the ball game) everyone else for ratings. We all tuned in,
we all stayed up until mid-night waiting to see if O.J. was going to
blow his brains out, or get shot by a cop. (Not that anyone WANTED to
see that, I certainly agonized, as I really like the teevee persona
that we knew as O.J. Simpson)
We watched intently, and then blame the media for bringing it to us.
I wanted to cry for the Simpson kids. What a terrible week for a
child...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.1924 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Mon Jun 20 1994 18:09 | 2 |
| Assuming no bail allowed? Any trial date set?
|
9.1925 | | VAOP28::Rice | It can't happen here | Mon Jun 20 1994 18:11 | 11 |
| > EVERYONE, (including myself) that I knew, be they at work or at home,
> was glued to their sets watching the Bronco roll down the highway.
I must admit that is fascinating. No one here watched it - people turned
off their sets. And we're 20 minutes from the border, and we all know OJ.
It was *disgusting* to watch the feeding frenzy over a man's personal
tragedy. The frenzy over MJackson's sex life is trivial in comparison.
The saddest part is that, once again, the kids pay the highest price.
josh
|
9.1926 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 20 1994 18:11 | 1 |
| There's another hearing on Wednesday.
|
9.1927 | Humankind has *always* had a fascination for this kinda thing | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Mon Jun 20 1994 18:22 | 9 |
| I don't see our fascination with watching the OJ saga play out any
different than, say, a big crowd on hand in France a few hundred years
ago to watch somebody get the guillotine.
Course the OJ drama was better cause nobody knew how it was gonna turn
out.
- ACC Chris
|
9.1928 | The Murder Trial of O.J. Simpson | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 21 1994 04:47 | 21 |
| Yesterday, Hall of Fame football star O.J. Simpson was arraigned in Los
Angles Municipal Court on two counts of murder in the 1st degree with special
circumstances for the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Deputy
District Attorney Marcia Clark will represent the people of California and
Attorney Robert Shapiro will represent the Juice. Clark was assigned to the
case by L.A. County District Attorney Gil Garcetti.
At the arrangement, O.J. Simpson was officially informed of the charges
against him and asked if he understood the charges. He replied that he did
understand the charges and entered a plea of Not Guilty.
Robert Shapiro then filed a formal motion for Discovery by which all evidence
collected by the state will be made available to the defense. Marcia Clark had
no objection to making the evidence available but requested that state
procedures be followed so as not to damage the evidence. A compliance hearing
was scheduled for Wed June 21 to discuss the discovery motion.
Shapiro also requested a Preliminary Hearing which was scheduled for June
30th.
George
|
9.1929 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 21 1994 04:51 | 36 |
| RE <<< Note 9.1924 by HANNAH::ASHE "Movin' on up, to the east side..." >>>
> Assuming no bail allowed?
There is no bail. O.J. has been charged with 2 counts of 1st degree murder
with "special circumstances". Under California law, that means that there is
no bail allowed and he is eligible for the death penalty. It's the same charge
that is pending against the Menendez brothers.
L.A. District Attorney Gil Garcetti. has said that they will wait until after
the indictment to decide if they will ask for the death penalty. At that time
they will be able to review the testimony of witnesses who testify before the
grand jury.
If the D.A. asks for the death penalty then under California Law the jury
will be asked to decide several things. First they have to decide if the
killing was a Homicide. If it was, they have to decide if it was 1st degree
murder or some lesser crime (2nd degree or manslaughter). If they decide it was
1st degree then they have to decide if there were "special circumstances".
If they convict O.J of 1st degree Murder with special circumstances, then
there would be a 2nd trial before that same jury to decide if he should receive
the death penalty or life without parole.
>Any trial date set?
Most likely they will have O.J. wave his 6th amendment right to a speedy
trial so that they can have time to prepare his defense. If it follows the
normal schedule, he should come to trial some time between spring and late
summer of '95. If his attorney decides to conduct a more complicated defense it
could take longer.
In any case, unless he pleads out, gets exonerated, or dies, the various
legal maneuvering should go on for at least 15 years.
George
|
9.1930 | | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Tue Jun 21 1994 09:58 | 4 |
| Thank you, Doug Lewellen!
billl
|
9.1931 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 10:04 | 2 |
| Boy, like I didn't already know all that from the news that's been on
all over the place.....
|
9.1932 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Tue Jun 21 1994 10:33 | 7 |
| I guess his housekeeper is the witness that won't testify without
immunity.... that according to "A Current Affair" lasted night.
Also, I guess OJ had planned to go to his wife's grave site and
pull the trigger before AC talked him out of it. That according
to "A Current Affair" too... Did you know Ronald Goldman was on
"Studs" once?
|
9.1933 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:03 | 4 |
| A Current Affair? Studs? Better snap out of it before you
start quoting prices on the Home Shopping Channel.
Mike
|
9.1934 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:09 | 7 |
| One could see how watching a beautiful ex-wife who broke up your first
marriage, spends all your dough, while letting a young guy who was
on "Studs" drive his Lambourginni after boinking her, could irritate
a guy.
(Not that I am suggesting that justifies murder, mind you, but it
*might* be the cause of a good arse kicking that got outta hand...)
|
9.1935 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:18 | 31 |
| RE football
New York is on a roll. They made the finals in Hockey and Basketball and the
Yankees look like they are making a run at the A.L. Pennant. If the Bronks
Bombers do make the fall classic, what are the chances that New York can make
it a grand slam and get one of their football teams into the Superbowl?
Since both teams play in New Jersey, will the New York fans consider them
New York teams if one of them makes it?
RE O.J.
Right now O.J. is charged with 2 counts of 1st degree Murder. Even if they
can prove the charge against his wife I think they might have a hard time with
the 2nd count, the one against Goldman.
In California, 2nd degree murder is defined as a homicide committed with
malice aforethought without premeditation. Since Goldman was sent to the house
by the restaurant to return a pair of glasses, it's going to be hard for the
state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that O.J. knew he was going to be
there so it will be hard for them to prove premeditation on that count.
The "special circumstances" depend on the state proving that there was a
double murder but I don't think it's clear whether or not they need two
1st degree murders or if one 1st and one 2nd will suffice.
The murder charges each carry a maximum sentence of 25 to life. Without
the "special circumstances" charge they don't have the death penalty and
they might not have life without parole.
George
|
9.1936 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:20 | 10 |
| > Since both teams play in New Jersey, will the New York fans consider them
>New York teams if one of them makes it?
New York fans have always considered the Giant and the Jets to be New York
teams.
However, the chances of the Giants or Jets winning the Bowl this year
are pretty slim....
|
9.1938 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:31 | 15 |
| Considering that there are now 3 wild cards in each conference, any chance of
either team making the playoffs? In football, if a team can squeak into one of
those wild card slots they can go quite far. A good example would be the
Patriots who won a couple upsets to get to the Superbowl.
It's weird, I normally hate New York teams living in Boston but now I find
myself pulling for them to repeat in basketball, "three-peat" in baseball,
and go for the Grand Slam in football.
GO NEW YORK!!!
Good grief, what am I saying?
:*)}
George
|
9.1939 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:42 | 14 |
| Yeah, but I think there's only been one WC in history that won the Bowl.
I don't know about the Jets, but the Giants could make the playoffs. Maybe.
Most Giant fans I know are not optimistic about this year's team. They've
lost too many good lineman, they're suspect at QB now with two young
QBs who ain't that good. George Young has his head up his ample wazoo,
Dan Reeves has no 'nads, and I'm predicting like an 8-8 season.
They made the 'offs last year at 11-5 and were spanked by the Niners. If they
make the 'offs again this year look for the same thing....
'Saw
|
9.1940 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:43 | 6 |
| One of the NY teams might make the playoffs but I just
don't see either of them , Jets or Giants, even making it to
the Super Bowl.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1941 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:49 | 13 |
|
>
> The Crazy Met
>
You're a Jets fan, right TCM?
I mean, I have hard time seeing the Giants making the 'offs, personally.
But if they do, I agree with you.....
'Saw
|
9.1942 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Tue Jun 21 1994 13:11 | 5 |
|
You guys are all forgetting the only team that PLAYS in New York. The
Bills could make it to the bowl again and actually win.
Ron
|
9.1943 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Tue Jun 21 1994 13:22 | 4 |
| O.J. has a better chance of getting an award from N.O.W. than
the Bills do of *winning* a Super Bowl...
/Don
|
9.1944 | Strike while it's hot.. | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Tue Jun 21 1994 13:38 | 5 |
| They should the "Studs" clip on "A Current Affair". I was waiting
for a commercial to end on either Letterman or Baseball Tonight...
besides, my roommates are from Buffalo... he found his Al Cowlings
rookie card through his collection over the weekend...
|
9.1945 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Tue Jun 21 1994 13:46 | 21 |
| OJ will get off with manslaughter. Bank on it. Like stated by our
Figure Skating Analyst, this trial will be very complicated and drawn out
over a year.
It's pretty eerie to see when Goldman was on STUDS, especially since
Nicole was with him then too. What was eerie is his response when
asked if that was OJ's wife he was with.
Interesting info about the housekeeper, I hadn't heard that. What does
she need immunity from? I noticed the "Paula - you're special" from
the letter was identified as model Paula Barbieri.
From the common sense school:
Nicole received $38K in alimony per month and $14K in child support per
month. OJ bought her the $90K Ferrari and also her $700K condo.
Yet she was so worried about a $50 pair of sunglasses left at the
restaurant. Doesn't take much to figure out that Goldman was in OJ's
way of reconciling with Nicole.
Mike
|
9.1946 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 21 1994 14:40 | 14 |
| There have been several reports that O.J. collectibles have increased
dramatically in price. On the radio this morning I heard a dealer say that
another dealer was trying to sell him a football autographed by the Juice for
$499. It had been around $100 last week.
Another dealer said he hadn't sold an O.J. card in months but now they are
going as fast as he can find them.
I wonder if there will be a new set with a white Bronco card. Or perhaps
one for each lawyer involved.
Oops, the macabre humor creeps in ...
George
|
9.1947 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Tue Jun 21 1994 14:40 | 5 |
| From what I saw of the show STUDS, and admittedly is wasn't
much, anybody with an IQ of over 75 was disqualified from being
a contestant.
/Don
|
9.1948 | What % of teams make it in baseball now | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:03 | 11 |
| For both NY teams to make the playoffs in football would be a HUGE
feat (Or all 3 for that matter). Even with the 3 WC teasm only 20%
of the teams in the NFL make the playoffs. I dont what the exact
% is now in hockey (With expansion) but it use to be 72% and the NBA
is like 62% and who know what it is in baseball... but if the new
Baseball format has 20% making the playoffs Football could be the
NEW Toughest sport to make the playoffs...
TIME to go to a 8 Divisions with 16 teams making the offs :-)
MaB
|
9.1949 | Won't post them in this forum... | ROCK::MURPHY | Good News for Mets - Can't finish 7th! | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:11 | 4 |
| Anyone wanting the Complete Box Set of OJ jokes can e-mail me.
Murph
|
9.1950 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:19 | 7 |
| > -< Won't post them in this forum... >-
>
> Anyone wanting the Complete Box Set of OJ jokes can e-mail me.
Aw c'mon, take a stab at it.....
|
9.1951 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Yankees are an embarassment-GeorgeK | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:20 | 2 |
|
Mac is really gone, huh?
|
9.1952 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Tue Jun 21 1994 16:27 | 16 |
| > Mac is really gone, huh?
Yes, Mac has been gone for several weeks now.
re the OJ joke list.
Actually, it's a good idea NOT to post it, simply because it
has come off the internet, and the internet is a wild, no-rules
kind of place, and the list contains at least one joke that
I know would be found offensive in the protected little
"valuing differences" world of DEC....
'Saw
|
9.1953 | a clean one | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Tue Jun 21 1994 17:02 | 2 |
| If it took OJ 4 hours to drive down the Santa Ana Freeway, how long
would it take Jim Brown and Walter Payton?
|
9.1954 | fyi - police tapes are being released | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Tue Jun 21 1994 18:22 | 20 |
| KGME had a major news scoop today. They played the tape of OJ speaking
to the cops while in the Bronco after AC brought him a new cell phone
from the police.
The police spokesperson was encouraging OJ by telling him about the
concern for him from his family, mother, children, and all the fans
around the property. He's trying to get him to come out of the vehicle
and come in the house. OJ responds with "Let me get to Nicole,
please." The negotiator tries to blow it off and says he doesn't want
anyone else hurt. OJ responds again, "I know they think I'm a fugitive
and a murderer and I'm going to go to jail." He reminds OJ of his
responsibility to his Momma and continues to encourage him to come into
the house. OJ keeps responding, "I'll try. I'll try." They leave the
cell phones on, the cop comes to the door to greet him and OJ exits the
truck.
OJ's voice sounds like he hasn't slept in days, is totally confused, or
is on something. He sounds very disjointed.
Mike
|
9.1955 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Jun 21 1994 18:27 | 8 |
|
>> He sounds very disjointed.
Maybe he had a bad day at the office.
|
9.1956 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Tue Jun 21 1994 18:28 | 6 |
| they release the tapes and yet say they don't want a media circus...
incredible..
OJ was under heavy sedation, doesn't surprise me if he sounds half
sleep...
|
9.1957 | Correction | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Tue Jun 21 1994 18:48 | 4 |
| � feat (Or all 3 for that matter). Even with the 3 WC teasm only 20%
� of the teams in the NFL make the playoffs. I dont what the exact
12 out of 30 teams make the NFL playoffs: (40%)
|
9.1958 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Tue Jun 21 1994 21:02 | 5 |
| 30 teams? NFL only has 28 at the moment. When do Charlotte and
Jacksonville join? 1994 or 1995??
The Crazy Met
|
9.1959 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jun 22 1994 11:22 | 29 |
| Court TV covered the "secret" grand jury hearing and had reports on things
leaked by a juror to the press. The evidence seems to include a house keeper
who said O.J. was not home waiting for the limo and some new blood tests.
What amazed the Court TV reporters was the amount of information that is
being leaked by the prosecution and other officials. It is clearly an organized
attempt to sway public opinion. As one Court TV reporter said, the prosecution
is already making it's opening statement to the jury pool.
Meanwhile, the defense is not exactly cooling it's heals. They have caught on
and are responding to the charges as they come out calling the blood test
flawed and inconclusive and reaffirming O.J.'s claim of innocence.
Also, an all-star defense team is being assembled to defend the Juice. Robert
Shapiro has contacted his old DWI client F. Lee Bailey who now seems to be
involved in the case on a consultant basis. He is also talking to other top
defense attorneys around the country.
Under California law, a defendant is entitled to at least 2 attorneys in a
capital case and Shapiro has said that there will probably be at least 3
working on the case full time. Shapiro claims that he will stay on as lead
attorney although he is best known for making deals, not going to trial.
When it was obvious that his last famous client, Eric Menendez, was going to
trial, he stepped aside for trial lawyer Leslie Abramson who is considered the
top capital defense attorney in California and who masterminded the Menendez
defense.
George
|
9.1960 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 13:56 | 5 |
| Local news said this morning that the police report is no big
revelation. The "evidence" they have is pretty much everything we've
already heard. It seems it will really hang on the DNA test, and even
that can be questioned if not done properly. If it's done right,
proving it wrong faces 1,000,000:1 odds.
|
9.1961 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 13:59 | 18 |
| While this is in the realm of totally unsubstantiated rumor, I heard this
morning that she was almost decapitated in the attack, and that Goldman
was cut from the tailbone almost to the neck.
One thing that comes to mind when hearing that is that it's a military,
commando style of killing. Especially Goldman's wounds...they would be
very difficult for an ordinary individual to make, no matter how strong.
(At least that's what some of my special forces friends have said).
If that is the case, then perhaps there WAS an accomplice, or another
suspect or whatever.
Again, this is all just RAW speculation......
'Saw
|
9.1962 | what's been confirmed so far - cops say attacker was VERY angry | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 14:32 | 17 |
| The wounds have been confirmed and are not speculation. The weapon is
a 15" *serrated* knife. Nicole's neck was sliced down to the backbone
(top vertebrae). Her wounds were "clean" so she didn't put up much of
a struggle.
I haven't heard anything about Goldman's wound the length of his back,
but they said his wounds weren't "clean." There were lots of tears so
this translates to quite a struggle.
Both victims were knifed to the back of the head first. Goldman was the
first victim. Nicole had 12 wounds around her upper body.
One thing you can say is that wounds like this create LOTS of blood
loss and there's no way the attacker wouldn't get any on him. The
crime scene is evidence of the blood loss - lots of it.
Mike
|
9.1963 | mask doesn't exist | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 14:42 | 5 |
| Shapiro just publicly called out Marcia Clark on the carpet during the
hearing. He initiated it by claiming he didn't have all the evidence
and wanted the rest of it. Clark said Shapiro has everything the
police do. Shapiro counters with questions regarding the mask. After
some hemming and hawing, Clark admits that there is no mask.
|
9.1964 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 14:48 | 12 |
| >
> Shapiro just publicly called out Marcia Clark on the carpet during the
> hearing. He initiated it by claiming he didn't have all the evidence
> and wanted the rest of it. Clark said Shapiro has everything the
> police do. Shapiro counters with questions regarding the mask. After
> some hemming and hawing, Clark admits that there is no mask.
>
Well, I'll make a prediction. This fight is gonna be far better than
Duran-Pazienza --- and it's all for free too.....
|
9.1965 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:01 | 8 |
| My observation of Shapiro so far is that the guy is brilliant, and his
supporting cast is shaping up the same way. The more I see from this
guy, the more I think OJ's got a chance to beat this. Like I've said
before, it's not a matter of guilt, it's a matter of whose lawyer is
the best.
Some of the locals so far have likened the prosecution's performance
thus far to the Broncos in the Super Bowl.
|
9.1966 | ::SOAPBOX might be more appropriate | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:06 | 5 |
| I thought there was a note created for this tripe. Heaven forbid
someone might want to enter something related to the NFL in here.
billl
|
9.1967 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:23 | 21 |
| >
> I thought there was a note created for this tripe. Heaven forbid
> someone might want to enter something related to the NFL in here.
>
Nope, I moved it here.
There's nothing going on in the NFL right now, and it's easier for me
to keep track of all of the stuff in one place.
Shapiro is a smart guy. The prosecution is just concerned with getting
re-elected. I have to laugh when they get up on their soapbox about
spousal abuse (which is a legit problem, no doubt, but Garcetti seems
to be campaigning already).
Of course I might be wrong in assuming that Garcetti's position is
politically appointed like it is in a lot of places......
'Saw
|
9.1968 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:25 | 1 |
| The DA is an elected position in LA.
|
9.1969 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:27 | 3 |
| So who plays the waiter? Rob Lowe or in his first actign role, Tony
Meola?
|
9.1970 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:27 | 12 |
| >
> The DA is an elected position in LA.
>
Then Garcetti must have wood all the time these days. He couldn't have
been more blatant during the news conference last week, and even one of
my buds who's not very quick on the uptake noticed the blatant stumping
that Garcetti was doing.....
'Saw
|
9.1971 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:28 | 10 |
| > So who plays the waiter? Rob Lowe or in his first actign role, Tony
> Meola?
Someone who swishes just a bit more. Bronson Pinchot using just a little
of the flair he used for Serge(?) in Beverly Hills Cop.....
'Saw
|
9.1972 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 22 1994 15:29 | 2 |
| Tony Meola gets the bit part as the Police Commander who has to announce
that OJ is now running.....
|
9.1973 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Wed Jun 22 1994 16:45 | 5 |
|
wouldn't the waiter part go to William Baldwin? He just won MTV's most
desirable male at their awards..........
|
9.1974 | damn, I just missed again | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 16:51 | 1 |
|
|
9.1976 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Jun 22 1994 17:12 | 5 |
|
200 year anniversary.
|
9.1977 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 22 1994 17:15 | 1 |
| well it's an honor just to get nominated.
|
9.1978 | back to nfl | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Jun 22 1994 20:05 | 5 |
| Don't mean to change the subject but I have a NFl question. Did the
49ers sign Richard Dent? I thought I read that somewhere....
Frank
|
9.1979 | | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Thu Jun 23 1994 09:18 | 14 |
| >> Don't mean to change the subject but I have a NFl question. Did the
>> 49ers sign Richard Dent? I thought I read that somewhere....
Sheesh, Frank, that was pretty slick there sneaking that NFL
related reply into here.
To answer your question, I had not heard anything about the
49ers signing Dent.
It's probably somewhere in the New York Rangers note.
billl
|
9.1980 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu Jun 23 1994 10:13 | 5 |
| |>> Don't mean to change the subject but I have a NFl question. Did the
|>> 49ers sign Richard Dent? I thought I read that somewhere....
Pretty sure I heard that they reached an agreement, and the signign was
immenant.
|
9.1981 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu Jun 23 1994 12:55 | 6 |
| According the my last Bear_Report Dent was signed. (For less money
than he wa offered by Da'Bears)
Sounds like his agent really over guessed Ricards value...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.1982 | Dent is a good addition | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Jun 23 1994 14:59 | 6 |
| Well being a 9er fan I was hoping the 9ers signed Dent. He can only
help their defensive line. He is still a good pass rusher. How old
is Dent?
Frank
|
9.1983 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Thu Jun 23 1994 15:29 | 1 |
| I think Dent is early 30s, but I could be wrong....
|
9.1984 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu Jun 23 1994 16:07 | 3 |
| |I think Dent is early 30s, but I could be wrong....
That sounds about right. That is downright ancient for a lineman...
|
9.1986 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Yankees are an embarassment-GeorgeK | Thu Jun 23 1994 17:25 | 4 |
|
Makes sense. Cook is a local boy who played at Stanford.
brews
|
9.1987 | | NYOSS1::BACH | A New York node? | Thu Jun 23 1994 17:39 | 11 |
| Dent played great last year, like a man giving everything he has
to give for the promise of his impending free agency.
The fact he was going FA may have been what put him on top. He was
drafted in the 8th round of the 1982 (mebbe '83) draft, he will have
posted 12 years as a pro, including super bowl XX MVP.
I hope he plays well, but losing him wasn't high on my list of guys
to keep. (Especially for what he wanted to be paid 4M/2years)
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.1989 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri Jun 24 1994 11:54 | 14 |
| re: .1988
I find it particularly distasteful the way the LA County DA, and Police are
playing this thing. It is abundantly clear that Gil Garcetti has high political
aspirations, and is siezing the moment to launch them.
It also troubles me that, since this case has gotten so much publicity, the case
against OJ needs to totally air-tight. I'm no lawyer (not do I play one in a
notes file), but is seems to me that if OJ were a regular guy, he wouldn't
stand a chance in court.
Too bad justice and determinng if he is guilty isn't the thing here.
=Bob=
|
9.1990 | Show Biz > Justice | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jun 24 1994 11:59 | 19 |
|
I agree that they have tried to prosecute this case in the media and I don't
like it. But, Shapiro and the defense has also been guilty of similar
actions. Every chance he gets, he's trying to make everybody feel sorry for
poor old OJ. I'll bet one of his next steps is to try to assasinate the
reputations of the 2 people who were slaughtered. That's easy to do since
they're dead and can't defend themselves. Even with all of the leaks and
rumors, I don't think we've heard all the evidence. There's no way that a
DA will bring charges against a celebrity/national hero if he didn't have
sufficient evidence. Remember, the DA is an elected official and OJ was/is
very well liked in Southern California. But then again, maybe the DA is
dumbed than I thought.
I think that the best thing at this time, for the press and everybody else,
is to sit back and let the Justice system do it's thing. The only thing is,
the terms "Justice" and "LA" in the same sentence seem to be a contradiction
in terms considering some recent verdicts. Kind of like a double negative.
Keith
|
9.1991 | exit | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jun 24 1994 12:03 | 8 |
| >Where were all
> of these people in 1989 when OJ was arrested for beating his wife?
A agree. But I'd like to add something. Where was the judge when he handed
down the "slap on the wrist" sentence ? Evidently, Nicole was not a pretty
sight after he got done mauling her.
Keith
|
9.1993 | | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Fri Jun 24 1994 12:24 | 15 |
|
There have been other trials (ie Rodney King) that everyone assumed
would result in a guilty verdict and did not. From the evidence that
has so far come out about OJ, et.al. a good lawyer (and Shapiro appears
to be one) is very likely going to be able to put "reasonable doubt"
in a juries (or at least some juror(s)) mind(s). The burden of proof
in criminal cases is very much on the prosecution; defense just had to
provide reasonable doubt they do not have to prove innocence since
the presumption is innocent until proven guilty.
Manslaughter as opposed to 1st or 2nd degree murder, either in a plea
bargain or trial verdict, would not surprise me.
The Crazy Met
|
9.1994 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jun 24 1994 12:30 | 12 |
|
>> Manslaughter as opposed to 1st or 2nd degree murder, either
>> in a plea bargain or trial verdict, would not surprise me.
He may plead down to manslaughter but he won't get it in
a trial verdict. If the definition in California is the
same here and manslaughter is causing death by reckless-
ness the I doubt that slitting two people's throat and
stabbing them repeatedly quite qualifies. OJ's got a
great lawyer though and right now the odds are against him
getting murder one.
|
9.1995 | Must be an election year 8^) | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Fri Jun 24 1994 12:48 | 19 |
| Despit the fact that it's not high quality literature, I can't help be
see paralllels between "A Time To Kill" and what's happening in LA with
OJ.
Not in terms of the case, but in terms of the publicity seeking attornies
who live to be on the evening news.
Gil Garcetti is scarier than Ollie North -- and folks here's a wakeup call,
that is pretty scary. Mr Crusade Against Violence Against Women is so
fake on that score that he could probably substitute the words
"Legalize Marijuana" if he thought it would get him more votes....
Shapiro is manipulating public sentiment as best he can to help his client,
but is increasing his fame at the same time....
I can't help but wonder if our founding fathers ever thought of little
wrinkles like this when they set it all up....
|
9.1996 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:09 | 13 |
| Great note, Tommy.
Keep in mind that the release of the 911 tapes was forced by the LA
Media under the Freedom of Infrormation Act. These weren't volunteered
over by the DA.
One thing certain in mind is that the DA will not try for the death
penalty. The DA wants, make that NEEDS, a conviction more than
anything else. Convincing a jury the OJ is guilty will be tough
enough. Convincing them to put him to death would be another matter
all together.
Mark.
|
9.1997 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:37 | 3 |
| Considering that region's recent performance in high-profile cases,
they NEED this one badly. I only perceive Shapiro playing the media
game as a counter to what the DA's office is doing.
|
9.1998 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Like A Moth To A Flame | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:37 | 9 |
| Much like in the Reginald Denny beating the DA may have overcharged
OJ. Without the bloody ski mask or bloody glove (neither yet exist,
despite the press "leaks" to the contrary), it's goin to be hard to
make the murder one charge stick. If acquitted the femminist hue
and cry will be heard from Bangor to Baja. But don't blame the
system on this one, blame a prosecutor trying to make points instead
of getting a conviction.
/Don
|
9.1999 | DNA Aspect of It | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:39 | 21 |
| Man, I want to believe he's innocent!
I wonder about the DNA testing. Is it the type of thing that
it always identifies with incredible statistical confidence
one way or the other? In other words, is it possible that if
the DNA fingerprints OJ, he has no chance and if it does not
fingerprint OJ, he's basically unconvictable?
Or is it possible that sometimes the testing finds that its too
hard with some blood samples to make anything out of it?
Besides the DNA thing, one thing blows my mind assuming he did
it. I figure to murder someone as hideously as he did, he would
have to be so drugged out of his mind, but if so that would be
very evident by people seeing him on his flight. But, if it wasn't
drug induced, how can a guy do that? That is evil to one mighty
high degree.
Tony
Tony
|
9.2000 | say NOOOOOOO to Kev | METSNY::francus | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:40 | 3 |
|
The Crazy Met
|
9.2001 | Pretty basic | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:44 | 6 |
| I'll wait for the jury verdict, but my gut says he did it.
If someone killed my wife, rather than cruising I-405 with a gun to my
own head, I'd be out looking for the person that actually did it.
Mark.
|
9.2002 | | SHARE::DERRY | Color me impressed... | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:46 | 14 |
| > enough. Convincing them to put him to death would be another matter
> all together.
Not to jump into a rathole with this *but* ...
If this weren't OJ Simpson, people would be calling for his head. Granted
it wouldn't have the media's drool all over it but if found guilty, he'd
be gased.
The majority of this country is in favor of the death penalty - as long
as it's committed against some Joe Blow slob and not against someone
they feel connected to. And everyone feels that they "know" OJ.
Nice double standard.
|
9.2004 | I can't yet see the basis for some of these early conclusions | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:54 | 30 |
|
>> Manslaughter as opposed to 1st or 2nd degree murder, either
>> in a plea bargain or trial verdict, would not surprise me.
>
> He may plead down to manslaughter but he won't get it in
> a trial verdict.
If this is the case I would say there would be no chance of a
manslaughter charge, then. I can't see the DA agreeing to such a
plea bargain, unless there's some kind of absolutely stunning evidence
that we don't yet know about (like that OJ was involved but wasn't
the main perpetrator-- and I just don't see that right now). They're
at murder one with special circumstances now, and it's a long way down
to manslaughter. If the evidence is there, the public would rightly be
outraged if this didn't go to trial on murder.
> OJ's got a great lawyer though and right now the odds are against him
> getting murder one.
This seems to be the majority opinion, and in general (not necessarily
here) a very cynical one. Regardless of the quality of his lawyer, why
are the odds so great against murder one? I understand that anything's
possible, but it's still very early, and if the experts line up one
after one in court with overwhelming direct evidence including DNA
tests and other physical evidence, why should a murder one conviction
be so improbable? Having a great lawyer and lots of money is an edge,
but it's not going to undo mounds of evidence...
glenn
|
9.2005 | How bad does it have to be? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Fri Jun 24 1994 13:59 | 11 |
|
> But don't blame the
> system on this one, blame a prosecutor trying to make points instead
> of getting a conviction.
Well, /Don, assuming that OJ actually did kill these two people, and
you believe that he is being overcharged, what exactly do you consider
a legitimate murder one charge?!
glenn
|
9.2006 | "Hard/soft on crime" fast being demonstrated a huge joke... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:05 | 13 |
|
> The majority of this country is in favor of the death penalty - as long
> as it's committed against some Joe Blow slob and not against someone
> they feel connected to. And everyone feels that they "know" OJ.
Bingo! And if some other kind of violent offender (which is exactly
what Simpson was convicted of, a violent offense) had been treated as
Simpson was and allowed an early parole or a work release or some other
such treatment perceived as lenient, the DA would be getting skewered
from the other end...
glenn
|
9.2007 | Sounds Like Spence | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:15 | 8 |
| re: .2003
I didn't see the shows you referred to Tommy, but the lawyer
I think must be Richard Spence (sp?). He is considered one
of the very best lawyers. The guy is incredible. If I was OJ
and I could have any lawyer, he'd be the guy I'd want.
Tony
|
9.2008 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:16 | 11 |
| Re: DNA
Now they can only question *how* the tests are done. If done properly,
they are extremely trustworthy. They're even opening old unsolved cases
and solving them today because of DNA testing.
It's also interesting how everyone is focused on abuse now. What's
even more interesting is news reports and statistics stating that men
experience incidences of abuse (by women) as much as women (by men).
Most people tend to focus only on police data, where charges are filed,
and wrongly believe it's only a "man-thing."
|
9.2010 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:30 | 5 |
|
I think men experience abuse more. I consider abuse everytime wife says
NO! I have headache......
;^)
|
9.2011 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:32 | 9 |
| | The majority of this country is in favor of the death penalty - as long
| as it's committed against some Joe Blow slob and not against someone
| they feel connected to. And everyone feels that they "know" OJ.
I also agree with Karen on this one. In fact I would fear that invoking the
death penalty in this case could be the catalyst for a new round of riots in
LA. Evidence the "supporters" lining the road during the car chase.
=Bob=
|
9.2012 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:44 | 6 |
| FWIW, I agree with Karen's point, but that wasn't why I made my point
about the DA not going for the death penalty. My point is that the
state of CA *badly* needs this conviction and doesn't need/want the
extra pressure (death penalty) put on the jury to convict OJ
Mark.
|
9.2013 | | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Fri Jun 24 1994 14:53 | 10 |
| Here's the biggest problem I have with this case (and I think it was
what several other have eluded to):
Had the tables been turned and Joe Blow had hacked up Simpson and
his lovely ex-wife you would never have all this BS being played
out in the media. And no one would blink an eye at giving the
'perp' the 'juice' (pun intended).
billl
|
9.2015 | "Studies show..." Please... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Indians in '94 | Fri Jun 24 1994 15:04 | 15 |
|
> It's also interesting how everyone is focused on abuse now. What's
> even more interesting is news reports and statistics stating that men
> experience incidences of abuse (by women) as much as women (by men).
> Most people tend to focus only on police data, where charges are filed,
> and wrongly believe it's only a "man-thing."
And the statistics on the big enchilada, spousal homicide, are what,
10 to 1 or higher in favor of men? Any sensible person can see this.
If anything merits that ridiculous "PC" label, it's the attempt to
pass battery off as an equal opportunity crime in the real world.
Let's be serious...
glenn
|
9.2016 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 24 1994 15:05 | 65 |
|
RE Could the death penalty scare off the jury, and did overcharging take
away the chance of manslaughter?
The answer to both is no. The jury will most likely get to chose between
several different charges. If they don't buy the death penalty or murder 1 then
they will probably have the choice to go for murder 2 or manslaughter. They are
normally given a list from which to pick and under California law could get to
these different verdicts if they believe the following:
Murder 1 with special circumstances
The Jury believed that O.J. premeditated the murder of both of the
individuals then carried out those murders.
The Jury believed that O.J. premeditated the murder of one of the two
individual, carried out that murder (Murder 1), then murdered the other
individual without premeditation (i.e. Murder 2).
There are some other "special circumstances" but so far they have not been
mentioned by the D.A. If they find special circumstances and if the D.A.
asked for the death penalty then there would be a 2nd trial before the
same jury to decide between death and life without parole.
Murder 1 without special circumstances
The Jury believed that O.J. premeditated the murder of one of the two
individual, carried out that murder (Murder 1), then killed the other
individual without malice aforethought (i.e. manslaughter), in self
defense, or not at all (i.e. someone else killed the other individual
and O.J was not involved).
Murder 2
The Jury believed that O.J. did not premeditate the murder but on the
spur of the moment without provocation decided to kill one or both
individuals with malice aforethought. This definition is obscure and
more often than not the only way a jury finds Murder 2 is if it's the
maximum charge or if they are compromising with each other.
Voluntary Manslaughter
The Jury believed that O.J. did not premeditate the murder but on the
spur of the moment with provocation or passion killed one or both of
the individuals.
The Jury believed that O.J. killed the individuals because he had an
UN-reasonable but immediate fear for his life.
Involuntary Manslaughter
The Jury believed that O.J. did not premeditate the murder but on the
spur of the moment with provocation or passion lost control, and
attacked the individuals which resulted in them being killed.
Not Guilty
The Jury believed that O.J. did not do it, killed because of a reasonable
and immediate fear for his life, or was insane.
There are other variations and that's somewhat of an oversimplification but
that's pretty much the way the law was described at the end of the Menendez
trial.
George
|
9.2017 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jun 24 1994 15:15 | 32 |
|
Sounds like the jury gets seated with a menu:
For appetizers, please pick 2 of the following:
Stalking Vehicle Theft
Breaking and Entering Trespassing
For entre�s, please choose one.
Murder (with circumstances) Manslaughter 1
Murder 1 Manslaughter 2
Murder 2
A l� Carte
Innocent
Please, remember that a 15% jail time will be added to
your total bill.
|
9.2018 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 24 1994 15:34 | 4 |
|
Exactly.
George
|
9.2019 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Fri Jun 24 1994 15:52 | 40 |
| Of Course on the opposite end of the California spectrum is Connecticut.
Thanks to the Tracy Thurman (might have the name wrong) case, in Connecticut,
if the police are called to your abode for any kind of domestic case,
they routinely give a summons.
They are not required by law to cite individuals, but rather the law in
CT states that the Police Officers are held liable should they not cite someone
and are subject to a fine should further domestic violence occurs
and someone gets harmed.
That's great in some cases.
But what REALLY happens is that two people are arguing (no physical stuff
just the typical argument you'd have with a spouse sometime -- f you, no
f you, no f YOU, no F YOU) and the neighbor calls the cops. The cops come
and by that time everything is all over. A simple shouting match that
ran its course. Now the cops know that if they don't issue a summons
if anything happens later they're liable and subject to a fine, so they
do their damndest to get the folks all riled up again, at which point
they issue a summons to everybody, even when both parties swear neither
touched the other.
That has happened to at least three married couples I know.
What happens after that? Well, when all these laws got passed, they set up
all these mandatory counseling programs run by state counselors. So these
folks who are normal people end up taking up some state employees time.
One friend of mine told me that counselor said "Look, I figure you guys
just had an argument, but I've got to go through all this stuff with you"
Now you know why Ct has the highest taxes in the nation. Talk about
overkill.
But hey, we won't have another domestic violence murder with all these
laws...... or will we?
|
9.2021 | Sheer Lunacy | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jun 24 1994 17:46 | 9 |
| re: -1
If we had a law for every circumstance that could save a single
life, we would bankrupt this nation what with the attendant costs
of 'following the law' as in the CT case.
That argument that if it saves one life is just not practical.
Tony
|
9.2022 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Fri Jun 24 1994 17:50 | 76 |
| > This is a big old rathole but why was the law enacted? Let me
> guess, a woman was killed. And maybe her name was Tracy Thurman?
Basically, her boyfriend was beating up on her. Cops were called, did
nothing. Boyfriend came back later and slashed her up.
Ironically, if she had been killed, we probably wouldn't have the law.
> Seems like a small price to pay if even a single life is saved
> or someone is spared a small amount of time living in misery.
Yes and no.
Actually what it is is a case of pass the buck. The cops feel they have
to cite
> I doubt many neighbors call the cops because of one argument.
Depends on how your neighbors feel about you. Had one friend who
had problems with the neighbors. I don't know what caused it all
but the neighbors were constantly complaining about this or
that or the next thing -- it seemed more ornery than anything real legit
to me.
Last summer they had an argument, windows open, basically a big
"f you" shouting match and the neighbors called. By the time the cops
got there all was forgotten and the couple was actually getting ready to
leave go shopping. By the time the cops left, they'd been cited for
disorderly, I believe, and the day was ruined. They both had to go through
this mandatory "counseling" which consisted of telling the story
(seperately of course) to the poor bastard who works for the state, then
commiserating about how messed up the system is. They talked to the
prosecutor who nollied the case. It worked out okay, but didn't have
to happen -- if the cops had been more judicious.
>If
> you and your spouse are constantly raising hell then you *need*
> counseling. There was a time a few months ago when damn near every
> day some guy went off the deep end and killed his wife or girlfriend
> here in Mass. It usually made the paper then was forgotten.
>
Ah, musta been the water...8^)
Seriously, there are periods like that -- it's weird. I used to notice
it when I was on the ambulance. Folks laugh about the full moon, but
man, that is one time when incidents of this stuff goes up, but there are
other times too we just couldn't explain.
Agreed about the counseling comment too, but there's a difference between
the constant arguing and normal differences of opinion I think....
> As for Connecticut having the highest taxes in the country, you're
> also the wealthiest state in the country - you get no sympathy here.
Demographics fool you. All the rich folk Noo-Yawk wannabes down in the
Gold Coast sway the mean. Go out in the east part of the state and you'll
find some dirt poor folks....
It's easier for them rich folks to pay the taxes than most of the rest
of us 8^)
But I live here because I like it here. It's where I was born and grew
up, and I like it, asinine governor, high taxes, or not....
'Saw
|
9.2024 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 24 1994 17:59 | 26 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2021 by STRATA::BARBIERI >>>
> That argument that if it saves one life is just not practical.
I agree, but in this case we're not talking about one life. The problem of
women getting beaten and murdered by husbands and boyfriends has reached
epidemic proportions. It's the leading cause of violent death among women and
one of the hardest crimes to control.
For example, if a bank robber cons a parole board into letting him out, it's
not often that he goes out the 1st day, grabs the closest thing to a weapon,
makes a bee-line to the last bank he robbed, kicks the door down tries to hold
up the place while screaming at the top of his lungs, then shoots himself after
killing the teller and taking the money.
But that flavor of thing happens all the time with these domestic violence
cases. These guys are just plane nuts. Kamikaze pilots had more regard for life
and exercised more common sense and restraint than some of these kooks. And
to top it off, 9 out of 10 think that what ever happened is all the woman's
fault.
Heck, if a couple screaming idiots who keep the neighbors up at night have
to do a couple counseling sessions to help get this problem under control that's
a small price to pay.
George
|
9.2026 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 24 1994 18:03 | 5 |
|
Uh-oh, now we've gone and done it.
George
|
9.2027 | big news | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Fri Jun 24 1994 19:11 | 2 |
| The judge just disbanded the grand jury due to the media influence.
Shapiro moved for this and was granted it.
|
9.2028 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jun 24 1994 22:53 | 19 |
| Well he didn't disbanded the grand jury he recused them from continuing
with this case. They still continue with other work they may have.
Court TV says that both Shapiro and Gil Garcetti in separate actions asked
the judge to take the grand jury off the case due to the publicity including
the 911 tape. The court then determined that members of the Grand Jury had
heard evidence not presented by the prosecutor and pulled them off the case.
The matter will now go to a preliminary hearing this coming Thursday in which
the state must lay out their case in public. The defense will now have the
opportunity to cross examine witnesses and challenge evidence which they can
not do during a Grand Jury hearing.
This is a really big win for the defense but the prosecution may have avoided
problems as well. Had the Grand Jury decided not to indict O.J. for murder but
to indict for a lesser charge like Manslaughter then that would have limited
the trial to manslaughter and O.J. would have been eligible for bail.
George
|
9.2029 | Too many problems need to be fixed, to fix this one | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jun 27 1994 11:47 | 16 |
| A few Back - Damn Im glad I dont live in CONN... My wife is mostly
Itailian and when she's mad she can yell.. but in 7 years of marriage
neither won of us has ever resorted to Physical Violence, but If we
got wrote up every time we yelled at each other Id have a few too many
tickets :-) Id call that overkill, of course I dont know of anyone
every being killed in any of the towns Ive lived in by there husband or
boyfriend. Is there a demographic region or Income Level HIGH RISK area
where this happens, like Poor and Live in City = High Risk ?
The Time/Money/Effort should be spent on Why some area's are more
common then others and doing something about that... And if we get
into that we could fill up this notesfile with One Huge RatHole...
Too many reasons, too many fixes and without Major Chances to the
entire system it wont change... (Welfare/Taxes/Police/Housing etc).
mab
|
9.2031 | Ive never known a case up close !!! | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jun 27 1994 12:18 | 6 |
| I asked if... IF IF IF IF IF it seemed more common ??????
I didnt suggest anything !!! Also (A 2nd ?'s) Do the Killers seem
to have Criminal Records, that seems to be a very common factor as
well... Maybe were parolling some of these folks too early ? (Again
a ?'s)
mab
|
9.2032 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jun 27 1994 15:02 | 32 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2031 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
> I asked if... IF IF IF IF IF it seemed more common ??????
> I didnt suggest anything !!! Also (A 2nd ?'s) Do the Killers seem
> to have Criminal Records, that seems to be a very common factor as
> well... Maybe were parolling some of these folks too early ? (Again
> a ?'s)
The guys doing the serious domestic violence are often a different group than
the career criminals. Typically they have had minor brushes with the law but
nothing big like bank robbery or murder.
This problem seems to cut across race, religion, and economic status. More
often than not the guys dealing out the abuse were abused themselves as kids
as apposed to growing up in an economically deprived area.
By the way, since my last note, two more women were shot in the greater
Boston area, one dead, one critical. Both boy friends are in police custody.
RE O.J.'s case
F. Lee Bailey, one of O.J.'s lawyers, has been making statements lately
challenging much of the evidence that was leaked to the press. He now says
that not only is there no ski mask, there is no stewardess who will testify
that O.J. was bleeding on the plane, there is no woman who saw O.J. near
the scene, and there is no body tissue from O.J. at the scene. He also claims
that O.J. has an alibi.
We'll see Thursday when the prosecution presents it's case at the preliminary
hearing.
George
|
9.2033 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Mon Jun 27 1994 15:04 | 2 |
| Bailey also ruled out a temporary insanity defense and stated he will
challenge the evidence.
|
9.2034 | They may end up with Just Circumstancial Evidence | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jun 27 1994 15:12 | 12 |
| Man LA might get hammered again ? have to wait and see just what
eveidence they really have and what holds water, could we all have
misjudge'd OJ based on what the Media Over Hyped ? My Inlaws have
him all but DEAD, saying he should get the death penalty and the
case hasnt even gone to court yet, Im sure there's many poeple out
there with the same Opinion, thats too bad... But I too felt when
he dissapeard and was no where to be found that he was guiley and
trying to find a way out....????
Man what the Media can do to ya....
>mab
|
9.2035 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jun 27 1994 18:18 | 7 |
| Imagine if he is *proven* innocent (ironic, isn't it ?...he's supposed
to be proven guilty !) ? I wouldn't want to be part of the LA prosecution
staff (read: kiss your career good-bye)...and what a statement about the
power of the media...and our society's adherence to the judicial process.
So far the biggest thing (IMO) that makes him look guilty is his running.
The Prosecution better hope that DNA test ID's him.
|
9.2036 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jun 28 1994 11:13 | 18 |
| The dueling media lawyers of the O.J. Simpson case have now turned their
attention to a phone call. Yesterday the coroners report for Nicole Simpson
reported that she had talked with her mother on the phone at 11PM the night of
the murder. F. Lee Bailey, attorney for O.J. Simpson, says that Simpson was at
home at 11PM waiting for his limo to take him to the airport.
Since then, Nicole's parents have been reported to have said that the call
was really at 10PM and that they are waiting for the phone bill to confirm the
time.
Meanwhile the prosecution may have suffered a major setback. Their witness
that placed O.J. hurrying away from the scene of the murder is reported to have
collected $100,000 from the TV program "Hard Copy" for giving them her story.
If this is true it could be used by defense lawyers on cross examination to
destroy her credibility. This was done to one of the most important prosecution
witnesses by Defense lawyer Roy Black in the William Kennedy Smith trial.
George
|
9.2037 | Hearing is going on now... | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Tue Jun 28 1994 13:22 | 1 |
|
|
9.2038 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Tue Jun 28 1994 13:50 | 2 |
| Any update?
|
9.2039 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Tue Jun 28 1994 14:33 | 3 |
| Not much new, they haggled over testing samples of evidence. The
prosecution won a movement to take hair samples of OJ to test against
hair in a cap found at the scene.
|
9.2040 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Jun 28 1994 20:07 | 8 |
| Well, it's been reported that Rosie Greer, who's an ordained minister, has
been visiting the Juice in jail. Billy Graham has also been talking to the
Juice on the phone.
However, there are no reports of any TeeVee preachers consoling the families
of the 2 people who were butchered.
Keith
|
9.2041 | (8^)* | PTOVAX::JACOB | Fresh from a week of I & I | Tue Jun 28 1994 22:31 | 5 |
| Well, Michael Jackson has visited O.J. and offered to look after his
kids while he's in jail.
JaKe
|
9.2042 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jun 29 1994 10:36 | 28 |
| At the hearing yesterday the Robert Shapiro, lawyer for O.J. Simpson stated
that the defense would turn over hair samples as reported in an earlier note.
There was also a debate between Shapiro and lead prosecutor Marcia Clark
over how the defense would be given access to evidence currently held by the
state. The defense wanted samples of all evidence turned over immediately to
allow for 4 days of analysis. That would have made the results available by
Monday which would be only two court days into the preliminary hearing.
The prosecution replied that it would take until Thursday morning to have a
complete list of what was available. They also said that while some evidence
like blood samples could be split, other evidence like hair strands and hair
follicles might not be abundant enough to be supplied to the defense. They
offered as an alternative allowing the defense to be present when the tests
were done.
The defense agreed to come to the tests but still insisted that they be given
samples to run their own tests. The prosecutor reminded the court that she was
not obliged to allow the defense to view their tests but was doing it as a
favor. She then asked that her expert be allowed to view the defense tests. The
defense objected saying that since the burden of proof was on the state not the
defendant that their tests were not required so that there was no reason for
the prosecution to be present.
The prosecution promised to have the list of what could be split and what
could not be split available Thursday morning.
George
|
9.2043 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | The Wind Cries Mary | Wed Jun 29 1994 12:46 | 8 |
| �like blood samples could be split, other evidence like hair strands and hair
�follicles might not be abundant enough to be supplied to the defense. They
�offered as an alternative allowing the defense to be present when the tests
�were done.
Glad to see they're not splitting hairs over splitting hairs.
/Don
|
9.2044 | | FRETZ::HEISER | ugadanodawonumadja | Wed Jun 29 1994 13:19 | 2 |
| Ex-Oiler, Mike Barber, has an FCA prison ministry too and have paid OJ
a few visits.
|
9.2045 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Wed Jun 29 1994 15:25 | 15 |
| Has any mention of the "real killers" been mentioned yet by the defense
team or OJ?
I would be mighty p*said at who ever killed someone I loved, and was
the cause of my imprisonment (as well as possibly setting me up for the
fall...).
You'd think someone would have said "I wish the police would start
working to catch the real killers instead of trying to make me
guilty!!!"
I think at this late date someone would make a reference to the real
killers...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.2046 | The REAL story | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 29 1994 15:44 | 29 |
| > I think at this late date someone would make a reference to the real
> killers...
Okay, I'm not supposed to say anything Chip, but if you promise not to tell
I'll fill you in on the real secret.
You see, it wasn't OJ that killed his wife and her friend, it was Space
Aliens.
It's a little known fact that Goldman was actually taken over four years
ago by a Space Alien intelligence. He was one of their operatives here
on Earth. Then, over time, he began to 'go rogue' and act more and
more human.
My sources say he was just on the verge of spilling his guts about the
whole Space Alien/Greys thing when they decided to kill him.
The hit was not supposed to take place at Nicole's house, and it was
an unfortunate circumstance that they had to carry out the hit in front
of her.
After they did Goldman, she had seen too much and had to be eliminated.
I could get in a lot of trouble for telling you this, so don't spread
it around, and don't mention my name.....
'Saw
|
9.2047 | ratings schmatings | MASALA::DWALLACE | Nurses ? I love 'em | Wed Jun 29 1994 16:06 | 4 |
| Reason the Grays were here was to secure a network deal for soccer
next year after seeing hoops & baisbawl were cack :-)
Davie.
|
9.2048 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jun 29 1994 16:10 | 15 |
| No one in O.J.'s camp has come up with a theory of who really did it. Several
who have been asked including his girl friend Paula have brushed off the
question or they have said that they just don't know.
The defense will take the position that it doesn't matter who really did it.
They will say that the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove that O.J.
was the one who did it, not their burden to prove that he didn't by coming up
with another suspect.
If nothing else, the fact that there is no other suspect is a major factor
lighting a fire under the prosecution, but they have to find some other means
to prove their case. An argument for process of elimination may not even be
admissible in court.
George
|
9.2049 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Wed Jun 29 1994 16:25 | 11 |
| I know the defense doesn't have to find someone else guilty to make OJ
innocent... I just think its weird that OJ hasn't expressed a desire
to see these people be brought to justice. Not on tv before the
arrest, not in the letters, not during the car chase, not after.
If OJ didn't do it, the person who did has made his life a living hell,
one would think he would have some hard feelings toward these folks.
Datsall.
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.2050 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 29 1994 16:32 | 13 |
| I'm still with you Chip.
I cannot believe that he has not come out and said "I didn't do it and
I want to find the bastards that did..."
I'd be going nuts if I was in jail for something I didn't do......
Course, I'm nuts to begin with so what can I say.....
'Saw
|
9.2052 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jun 29 1994 16:47 | 5 |
| It's a major point. The fact that no other suspect seems likely and there
seems to be no scenario pointing to the likelihood of another suspect will be a
major driving force behind what goes on if not in court itself.
George
|
9.2053 | Those pesky So. Cal. space aliens... | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Wed Jun 29 1994 16:49 | 2 |
| I didn't meet those aliens, not that I can remember...
|
9.2054 | | CAMONE::WAY | Real men use iron sights | Wed Jun 29 1994 16:59 | 8 |
| > -< Those pesky So. Cal. space aliens... >-
>
> I didn't meet those aliens, not that I can remember...
These guys are the equivalent of the Space Alien Mafia.... The ones you
met were kinda like the equivalent of the Space Alien Keystone Kops....8^)
|
9.2055 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Temptation is a Gun | Wed Jun 29 1994 18:05 | 5 |
|
F. Lee Bailey did ask Shapiro why he wasn't ask the police to find the other
killers and Shapiro said his job is to prove OJ innocent and nothing else.
mike
|
9.2056 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Fresh from a week of I & I | Wed Jun 29 1994 20:49 | 4 |
| Shapiro, IMHO, is a bungling fool.
JaKe
|
9.2057 | a joke for ya | CNTROL::CHILDS | Let Love Have It's Way | Wed Jun 29 1994 22:13 | 10 |
|
so anyways this is about a week old or so but just in case you missed it:
Did you hear OJ's innocent?
He played for the Bills, they choke, they don't stab........
mike
|
9.2058 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 30 1994 10:40 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2056 by PTOVAX::JACOB "Fresh from a week of I & I" >>>
> Shapiro, IMHO, is a bungling fool.
How so? So far it appears that he's doing a 1st rate job. Have you caught
him in an error?
George
|
9.2059 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Rangers 1994 Stanley Cup Champions | Thu Jun 30 1994 11:15 | 7 |
| what a zoo. all the networks are planning on showing todays proceedings
live. they're gonna make all those Soaps fans real happy. maybe there
will be a major assasination or somethin' that will force 'em all to
cover something else.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2060 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 30 1994 11:39 | 18 |
| The hearing could last anywhere from several days to a week. The circus will
all die down. The 1st day or so it will be:
ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Court TV
By next week it will be down to:
CNN, Court TV
By late in the week it will be only:
Court TV
A couple good 2 hour battles between Robert Shapiro and Marcia Clark over the
timing in which a folder of copies of DNA reports is to be delivered will shake
off the big three pretty quick.
George
|
9.2061 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu Jun 30 1994 13:04 | 28 |
| > How so? So far it appears that he's doing a 1st rate job. Have you caught
>him in an error?
Well, I don't think the prosecution or the defense is doing a first rate
job. They all seem to be more concerned about their TV image than justice.
I doubt that either performance to this date will appear in any law
school textbooks. For Shapiro, here's a couple of things that I think he
bungled:
1. When asked how he will defend his client, he answered that all
possible defenses will be explored. A lot of people would take
that to mean he could get his client to plea bargain, plead innocent
by reason of insanity or plead innocent. He would have been much
better off just telling the press that he would defend his client
with "the truth" and then waiting to evaluate the evidence before
giving any details about the defense tactics. For many people,
the way Shapiro answered that question, implied that the Juice
really did it.
2. How about his tall tale about how the Juice escaped. According to
him, there were a couple of doctors, Al Collings and himself
all present. He was due in the police station shortly and everybody
was concerned about the Juice offing himself. Meanwhile the Juice
is wailing and everybody conveniently finds themselves in another
room while the Juice escapes. But nobody notices that the wailing
stopped and the Juice escapes. His yarn sounds really fishy to me.
Keith
|
9.2062 | uh, yer honor???? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Jun 30 1994 13:30 | 11 |
|
Yabbut where's Hawk just when ya need a bailiff to whack his
pee-pee?
;^)
I remain,
proud of serving in da_jury during Da_Trial!
Kev
|
9.2063 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Jun 30 1994 13:32 | 7 |
| re: .2061
On the other hand law textbooks and the actual practice of law more
often than not have nothing to do with one another.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2064 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jun 30 1994 14:00 | 47 |
| <<< Note 9.2061 by PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF >>>
> Well, I don't think the prosecution or the defense is doing a first rate
> job. They all seem to be more concerned about their TV image than justice.
As the Court TV reporter said, both sides are giving their opening statements
to the jury pool. As for justice, both Clark and Shapiro are court officers and
have to follow the law and rules of ethics, but within that they both have a
fiduciary responsibility to zealously represent their clients, in this case the
state and O.J. respectively.
In other words, they are doing the Leo Derocer thing of reading the rules to
see what they can do, not what they can't do.
> 1. When asked how he will defend his client, he answered that all
> possible defenses will be explored. ... For many people,
> the way Shapiro answered that question, implied that the Juice
> really did it.
Well maybe. Other's will just think he's doing what he has to do to defend
his client. Also that hasn't been given much press.
> 2. How about his tall tale about how the Juice escaped. ... But nobody
> notices that the wailing
> stopped and the Juice escapes. His yarn sounds really fishy to me.
Most people who are wailing stop after a bit, especially if their best friend
is talking to them. It was a surprise to everyone that he took off. And it's
not at all clear that he was escaping, many people believe he was trying to get
to the cemetery to commit suicide.
On the plus side, Shapiro has done a ton of other things that are pretty good
including:
1. Getting the Grand Jury recused and getting a preliminary hearing.
2. Getting the media spin against his client started by the D.A. under
control.
3. Forcing Marcia Clark to stand up and say "there is no ski mask".
4. Conducting a full court press on discovery.
5. Putting together an all-star defense team and getting them to work
together.
George
|
9.2065 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu Jun 30 1994 15:06 | 7 |
| There is (according to a CNN/USA Today survey) also much sympathy for
OJ. If Shapario had anything to do with the letter read by whathisname
and the escape, etc. one would think getting any sympathy for a
guy who was on the 911 call, them accused of a double slasher murder
is doing pretty well...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.2066 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jun 30 1994 15:26 | 7 |
| Heard on WEEI on the way back to the office:
Shapiro cross-examining the expert witness re: evidence and supposedly
has damaged the expert's credibility.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2067 | ;-) | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu Jun 30 1994 15:31 | 1 |
| yes and he did a fine job.
|
9.2068 | Mel Ott never killed anyone | AKOCOA::BREEN | Come to Daddy | Thu Jun 30 1994 15:32 | 10 |
| >Leo Derocer
George, phoenetically I can't fault you but that's Durocher, a not so
nice guy who also made headlines and spent some time in front of
judges.
Leo coldcocked a teen outside the ballpark but was never put on trial
but later was suspended for telling the truth about George MacPhail.
buillthe
|
9.2069 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Thu Jun 30 1994 16:49 | 8 |
|
Caught this from Paul Harvey this a.m....
Anybody know from where the word 'testimony' is derived?
|
9.2070 | Picture that today... | CSC32::GAULKE | | Thu Jun 30 1994 17:01 | 13 |
|
According to Paul, the Romans did not have any books to swear on,
as we do today when we use the Bible.
Sooooo, what they did was grab their testicular appendages and
swear on their manhood.
And now you know the 'left' of the story.
|
9.2071 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Jun 30 1994 17:02 | 10 |
|
Yup!
Should we spill the beans now or wait a bit?
I remain,
heard it also
Kev
|
9.2072 | testis: witness | HBAHBA::HAAS | Ate a hot dog, made me feel good | Thu Jun 30 1994 17:04 | 4 |
| It's a_early ancient portmanteau for the state men get in when they get
hit in the groinal region and start to cry.
TTom
|
9.2073 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Fri Jul 01 1994 09:27 | 10 |
| I was feeling sick yesterday, so went home about 11 AM.
Watched some of the OJ court thing. Shapiro was questioning
everything about the criminalist who ran the lab that was in
charge of all the samples, etc. Also, Shapiro asked for her
vitae and time to look over it before continuing.
This think is gonna last a long time.
scott
|
9.2074 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 01 1994 10:37 | 39 |
| It should go a couple or three weeks.
In what could be the 2nd most important decision in this case after the jury
verdict, the defense in the O.J. Simpson case has asked that all of the
evidence taken from O.J.'s house be suppressed. It seems that police detectives
who arrived at O.J.'s house on the morning after the murder with no warrant
scaled the fence and let themselves in when no one answered and opened the
gate.
Once inside they found O.J.'s White Ford Bronco with what appeared to be
blood stains and a trail of blood leading from the car to the house and up to a
bedroom and bathroom. They also found a "bloody glove" and a cap with both
short dark and long blond hair. If this gets thrown out it could be a major
blow to the prosecution.
The police claim that they were allowed to enter the grounds because they
were able to observe what appeared to be blood from outside the property. Under
California law, if evidence is in plain view, police may make a search without
a warrant. But if the court determines that the evidence was not in view, all
evidence taken from O.J.'s house could become inadmissible.
If the evidence is admitted and O.J. is found guilty, this would no doubt be
grounds for appeal.
At the hearing a store clerk and the owner of the store testified that they
sold O.J. an expensive "collector's" knife that is about 15 inches long when
opened including the handle. The blade is thin with one edge and the handle was
carved from the antlers of some animal.
The clerk testified that after his grand jury testimony, he made arrangements
with "Hard Copy" to sell his story for $12,000. The owner testified that the
money would be split 3 ways between the clerk, himself, and his brother who is
a co-owner of the store. The clerk testified that someone named "Patty" who
worked for the D.A. told him that it was ok to talk to the press.
Most of the rest of the hearing consisted of haggling over the defense being
allowed to either test or view testing of the material evidence.
George
|
9.2075 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Let Love Have It's Way | Fri Jul 01 1994 10:41 | 2 |
|
OJ's gonna walk..........
|
9.2076 | what will it come to? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Ate a hot dog, made me feel good | Fri Jul 01 1994 10:42 | 4 |
| I guess the nexted step in this sordid mess will be p-name wagers about
the outcome of OJ's case.
TTom
|
9.2077 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 01 1994 12:32 | 7 |
| re: .2074
There was also something about the police coming to tell OJ's kids what
had happened which is why they got onto the property another time.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2078 | just on the news wire | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:33 | 6 |
| Well I mentioned a few back that another major event could get rid of
the Simpson story. Almsot happened. Arafat is making his first visit to
the Gaza strip today and there was an assasination attempt on him.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2079 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:35 | 9 |
|
>> Arafat is making his first visit to the Gaza strip today and there
>> was an assasination attempt on him.
What a surprise!
|
9.2080 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:48 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2077 by MSE1::FRANCUS "Mets in '94" >>>
> There was also something about the police coming to tell OJ's kids what
> had happened which is why they got onto the property another time.
If that's their excuse for going on to the property then the evidence is
toast.
They claim there was blood on the curb and that they could see blood from
outside the gate. If that's true then they would be allowed to go in uninvited
and secure the evidence.
If they just broke in to tell the relatives the sad news and didn't see the
blood until they got inside, then that would be an illegal search. All evidence
they found would be out and anything that they discovered elsewhere because of
leads provided by that evidence would be "fruit of the poisoned tree" and
would be excluded.
Big decision coming down,
George
|
9.2081 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:50 | 5 |
| Well I admit it I'm home and have the TV on to the pretrial hearing.
Not all that much like Perry Mason, but then he only had an hour.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2082 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | The Wind Cries Mary | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:52 | 4 |
| I bet Theodoric Of York, Medieval Lawyer could figure out of
OJ was guilty or not...
/Don
|
9.2083 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 01 1994 14:03 | 3 |
| Met, can you give us an update.
George
|
9.2084 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 01 1994 14:11 | 10 |
| Testimony by the floor manager at the restaurant weere Nicole Brown had
dinner that night - re returning the glasses. Terstimony by a co-worker
of Ron Goldman. Testimony by a neighbor os Nicole about a dog
incessantly barking at Nicole's home starting abotu 10:15PM. Defense
pointed out some contradictions with statements the police took. Not
all that much happening, no new revelations.
In recess until 1:15 Eastern
The Crazy met
|
9.2085 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Jul 01 1994 14:18 | 1 |
| Like I said weeks ago, he'll get off on manslaughter.
|
9.2086 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jul 01 1994 14:21 | 13 |
|
I heard this morning something about finding pieces of a knife
in one the wastewater treatment tank at an airport. This processing
tank would be one that processes that nice blue_water used in airlines,
then recycled to be used as 'Blue_ice' by Rubber-Maid.
If so, I'm glad I'm not in OJ's shoes.
He can get in a lot of trouble for putting a foreign object in
an airplane toilet.
|
9.2087 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Fri Jul 01 1994 14:48 | 2 |
| Could Brother Theodore convict him?
|
9.2088 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 01 1994 15:01 | 6 |
| Some evidence in an envelope that is suspected to be the knife. May be
revealed later today. Handed in by - I think I got this right - the
defense. This is the knife that OJ purchased.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2089 | clearer muddle | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 01 1994 15:24 | 14 |
| The defense submitted an envelope as evidence. A retired superior court
judge acting as a special master ruled that it should remain closed.
One other superior court judge suggested it should be opened. Presiding
judge is reserving judgement on this. If the defense wants to submit
the contents as evidence they have to show the contents to the
prosecution first - something called reciprocal discovery.
Law analysts are saying that if the defense does not plan on entering
the contents as evidence they have no idea what the defense is
thinking. Unusual for the defense to submit evidence in a pre-trial
hearing.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2090 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 01 1994 15:55 | 9 |
| Lunch recess.
More on reciprocal discovery. Prosecution must show the defense
everything they find, whether or not they plan on using it in court.
Defense only needs to show the prosecution items it will use as part of
the defense.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2091 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 01 1994 16:09 | 18 |
| If it is a knife, there is a reason that was mentioned last night as to why
the defense would be presenting it as evidence.
The prosecution doesn't have the murder weapon, only a coroners report saying
that the victims were murdered with a knife.
The prosecution called a witness to say that O.J. bought a knife.
If O.J. can't produce the knife, then the prosecution can imply that he
murdered the victims with that knife then threw it away. If he provides the
knife, and tests show it was not consistent with the wounds, then the
prosecution is back to square one on the murder weapon.
If O.J. did not use this particular knife for the murder (either because
he didn't do it or because he used a different knife), then he might have
had someone bring the knife in to Shapiro.
George
|
9.2092 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Fri Jul 01 1994 16:17 | 13 |
|
Yabbut how's this for a whacked-out idea?
When they have the actual trial, how's about them holding it in da Rose
Bowl and charge admission?????
Certainly could help Calif's budgetary problems, eh?
I remain,
thinking it would be fitting the circus atmosphere too
Kev
|
9.2093 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 01 1994 16:21 | 6 |
| Don't laugh, they could probably fill it with little effort at $20 a throw.
Actually, wouldn't the Coliseum be more appropriate? I believe that's where
U.S.C. plays.
George
|
9.2094 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 01 1994 16:35 | 5 |
| they could have cheerleaders for defense and prosecution and announce
the jury.
And they could have some idjit running around in a scales costume as
mascot
|
9.2095 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Fri Jul 01 1994 16:39 | 6 |
|
Yabbut I think we're onto something here!
Tickets would be good for one day only
|
9.2096 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jul 01 1994 17:01 | 10 |
|
Every time the prosecution calls a new witness, the chariot
can come out and circle the field, and the band can play
that obnoxious tune that seems to get played every time
Charlton Heston dons a tunic.
|
9.2097 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 01 1994 17:02 | 22 |
| I got a report from home. This is 2nd hand so it may be off a bit.
The neighbor that discovered the bodies testified. From what I heard, he
testified that he heard the dog barking and basically going nuts at around
10:15PM. He went out some time later when the dog wouldn't stop barking and
noticed blood on it's paws.
There was something about him trying to take the dog somewhere but I'm not
sure about that. At some point after 11, he decided to take the dog for a walk
to try to calm it down and came across the bodies. The dog belonged to Nicole.
At one point O.J. gave some sort of emotional response over pictures of the
bodies. From what I heard the pictures were placed up on some sort of board but
covered out of respect for family members in the audience. The prosecutor would
uncover them as she wanted to show them to the witnesses.
The pundits at Court TV, including Roy Black, said that what she was doing
was classic grandstanding and had nothing to do with sensitivity towards family
members.
Hollywood,
George
|
9.2098 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Fri Jul 01 1994 17:17 | 2 |
| OJ got a little squeamish too when they talked of the "river of blood"
coming from Nicole and flowing down the walkway.
|
9.2099 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Jul 01 1994 18:00 | 31 |
| RE: 2097
Well, being a short timer, home office guy, the testimony wasn't quite
like that...
The dog guy heard the animal start at 10:15 and heard it continue until
he went to bed. A husband and wife found the bodies during their walk
and only saw Nicole Brown on the ground. The wife only saw the body
for a second.
They all turned green at looking at the pictures, although it seemed
that showing them the pictures were consistent with everything else
the prosecution has done.
The defense provided two surprises. The tapes, which the prosecutor
mentioned held the date 6/14 and wasn't brought forward to discovery
until a few moments ago, couldn't listen to the mini-cassette tape
and they are now listening to them. No one knows what is in the
sealed envelop although Shapiro looks pretty smug about it.
If they had definitive proof the OJ is innocent, and held it until
now (from the 14th) he should be ran up a rail. I'm guessing that
it ain't proof positive of innocence.
I had to talk to someone for about 45 minutes during this, so I might
have missed something, but that is what I've seen so far...
I can't help but think my man did this, but if he didn't this must be
a pretty good form of hell for a guy...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.2100 | Dog's Impact On Time of Phone Call | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jul 01 1994 19:12 | 9 |
| Testimony of dogs barking at 10:15 sure makes the uncertainty
of the phone call of Nicole Simpson's mother with Nicole a
lot less so. In other words, they probably did talk before
the dogs barked and thus not at 11:00.
Obviously, an 11:00 phone call verified by the phone company
would have been O.J.'s best defense.
Tony
|
9.2101 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Sat Jul 02 1994 11:30 | 3 |
| Anyone hear a rumor that OJ's son is in on it and OJ's protecting him?
(The one that came up to the Bronco after the chase...)
|
9.2102 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Jul 04 1994 12:13 | 10 |
| It looks to me like someone else must be in on it (if the Juice is
guilty), even if it was an after the fact clean-up role. OJ simply
did not have enough time to clean and fly unless he had from 10:15
and mebbe some help.
If he had until 10:15p, he could have dumped that knife anywhere. If
he had someone dump the knife for him, it could be at the bottom of
the Atlantic by now.
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.2103 | Happy 4th to anyone else in here 2day | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Mon Jul 04 1994 14:44 | 3 |
| Somebody'll find the knife in a can of Tropicana someday.
JaKe
|
9.2104 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Mon Jul 04 1994 21:34 | 4 |
| Hi JaKe.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2105 | Fresh Squeezed! | SAHQ::ZOGRAN | | Tue Jul 05 1994 14:24 | 5 |
| ANybody out there have any updates on the OJ hearings? Gee, maybe
they'll open up the envelope and find that free Ginsu knife OJ sent
for!
UMDan
|
9.2106 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Jul 05 1994 14:25 | 16 |
|
Yabbut I still say the dawg did it!
Also, inside the envelope is
a new HavaHeart flea collar!
ta boom!
|
9.2107 | stick a fork in him | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Jul 07 1994 13:24 | 7 |
|
The judge in the OJ spectacle has just ruled that the evidence that
the cops found *before* getting the search warrent is admissible in
court.
|
9.2108 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 13:28 | 6 |
| Yabbut, one guy said on Imus this morning that the reason the defense
made all those motions was to set up an appeal....
I don't really have an opinion one way or the other in this, but if
those LA Cops had "exigent circumstances" I'm the Queen of England....
|
9.2109 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jul 07 1994 13:56 | 6 |
| All in one voice while looking at 'Saw:
God save my country god save my liberty god save the Queen
The Crazy Met
|
9.2110 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jul 07 1994 14:02 | 25 |
| The judge took the safe course. By admitting the evidence, they can to go
ahead with the trial and if he's found guilty a higher court can sort it all
out afterwards by either changing the law to say that it was ok or by ordering
another trial without the evidence. Had she thrown it out, the prosecution
would not have had the right to appeal after an acquittal.
The prosecution may have another problem though. The cops obviously lied
about the reason they went to O.J.'s house. The other family members were
notified over the phone or by a single "uniform" which is department policy. By
contrast, the 4 lead detectives were sent to O.J.'s house, 2 claiming that they
were there only to keep the other 2 from getting lost.
At a real trial, the defense will be able to grill them on this during cross,
bring in witnesses to say this is not normal procedure, then suggest to the
jury "if the cops lied about this, what else did they lie about".
The fact that the prosecution had the cops give that type of testimony shows
how much they were worried about the defense motion.
Next big thing is the blood. If the DNA test shows that O.J.'s blood was at
the scene, he's toast. Even if he gets off, no one would give him a job
anywhere. He'll be doing radio talk shows in Portland with Tonya. If the blood
is inclusive, then the case will turn on the evidence found at O.J.'s house.
George
|
9.2111 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 14:33 | 8 |
| > Next big thing is the blood. If the DNA test shows that O.J.'s blood was at
>the scene, he's toast. Even if he gets off, no one would give him a job
>anywhere. He'll be doing radio talk shows in Portland with Tonya. If the blood
>is inclusive, then the case will turn on the evidence found at O.J.'s house.
The guy on Imus the other morning said that it was going to be a blood
case. I forget his name, but he's the guy that's always wearing the
buckskin jacket.....
|
9.2112 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 14:33 | 3 |
| re TCM:
We are not amused.....
|
9.2114 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Jul 07 1994 14:43 | 9 |
|
Yabbut 'saw, what kind of radion do you have? I ain't never
heard of a radion with a video screen.......
buckskin jacket?????????
;^)
|
9.2115 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jul 07 1994 14:46 | 3 |
| To me, it seems very probable that the defense is working for a plea (despite
statements to the contrary)....jail time with a chance of parole vs. the
death penalty.
|
9.2116 | Which is it? | CSC32::J_HENSON | and it's still too short! | Thu Jul 07 1994 14:48 | 3 |
| I'm confused. Did he say "the Queen", or "a queen"? ;-)
Jerry
|
9.2117 | in the year 2025 if oj is still alive... | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jul 07 1994 14:49 | 11 |
| George you understated a bit about re-trial but methings you also agree
that there is a very good likelihood that this ruling will in fact be
reversed and a new trial ordered which brings us to 1997,98 and oj is
still out there.
George, at one point if any can oj be remanded to somekind of
non-prison type incarceration in all this trial / appeal (I didn't even
mention the possibility of first trial prior to appeal going to hung
jury). It looks like he is facing up to four years in jail of some
sort before final verdict is handed down (and second trial can generate
new appeals, no?).
|
9.2118 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 14:50 | 17 |
| >I'm confused. Did he say "the Queen", or "a queen"? ;-)
The Queen.....
(Off with that bugger's head!)
Kev, let me explain.....
When Imus got this guy on, he mentioned that he had appeared
on {CBS This Morning, Good Morning America, Today} pick one, and
always wore a buckskin jacket. He's like from Montana or someplace
like that.
I wanna say his name is Jim Spence, but I'm probably on hallgueons
with that....
|
9.2119 | Imus guest | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Jul 07 1994 15:00 | 1 |
| Jerry Spence from Wyoming.
|
9.2120 | But for now we'll ignore his 4rth Amm rights | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Jul 07 1994 15:02 | 10 |
| I think its obvious that his 4rth ammendment rights were stepped on
and if this were a regular Joe he may have already walked, but being
a high profile, public type trial the judge didnt have the gonands to
admit the should be rent a cop wannabess F'd Up and sent a potential
guilty man back out as a free man...
These rules are in place to protect the guilty, and in his appeal it
may just happen ...
MaB
|
9.2121 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Thu Jul 07 1994 15:09 | 20 |
| | <<< Note 9.2120 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
| -< But for now we'll ignore his 4rth Amm rights >-
|
| I think its obvious that his 4rth ammendment rights were stepped on
| and if this were a regular Joe he may have already walked, but being
| a high profile, public type trial the judge didnt have the gonands to
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| admit the should be rent a cop wannabess F'd Up and sent a potential
| guilty man back out as a free man...
|
| These rules are in place to protect the guilty, and in his appeal it
| may just happen ...
|
| MaB
|
Of course not, the judge is a female.
Kevin
|
9.2122 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jul 07 1994 15:11 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2120 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
> These rules are in place to protect the guilty, and in his appeal it
> may just happen ...
No, these rules are in place to protect everyone and the guilty sometimes
take advantage of them.
The last time you put a sign on your lawn saying "Elect Herbert", where
"Herbert" was running against the Mayor or Sheriff, the 4th amendment was the
reason that the cops didn't bust into your house, tear it apart, and throw you
in jail because of some speck of contraband you may have had lying around from
the mid '70s.
The problem here is that this was not a clear 4th amendment violation. It was
in the gray area between "reasonable" and "unreasonable" in a state where the
higher courts are moving in a conservative direction. Under those conditions
it makes sense for a lower court judge to let the upper court figure it all
out.
George
|
9.2123 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 15:12 | 32 |
| > admit the should be rent a cop wannabess F'd Up and sent a potential
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't fault the cops for pushing the limit, if they thought they could
get away with it. If I were a betting man, I'd be betting that they
figured that OJ did it and wanted to nab him. They pushed the limit on what
they could do.
> These rules are in place to protect the guilty, and in his appeal it
> may just happen ...
I disagree totally. The 4th Ammendment was not put in place to protect
the guilty. It was put into place because the British at the time could
just walk into anyone's home and search it. The founding fathers didn't
want that to be able to happen.
The 4th Ammendment protects you from what typcially happens in a police
state (you can read that Nazi Germany if you like), where they just crash
into your house in the middle of the night, looking for whatever they want
to look for without telling you why.
So, bottom line, you have to have a warrant to search someone's home,
unless there are exigent circumstances.
Personally, I don't feel the police had exigent circumstances in this
case, and their interpretation was mighty, mighty close to the line on
what exigent circumstances are.
|
9.2124 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jul 07 1994 15:20 | 27 |
| <<< Note 9.2117 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> George, at one point if any can oj be remanded to somekind of
> non-prison type incarceration in all this trial / appeal (I didn't even
> mention the possibility of first trial prior to appeal going to hung
> jury).
Only if he's acquitted or if the charge of Murder 1 with Special Circumstances
is dropped.
Consider the case of Eric and Lyle Menendez, the 2 kids in California who
shotguned their parents then got hung juries after saying they were abused
and claiming self defense.
The shooting took place in August of 1989. They were arrested in Spring of
1990 and finally came to trial last summer. The trial lasted 6 months and ended
in 2 hung juries. Both of them lived in the L.A. County Jail from the time they
were arrested until O.J. was arrested. At that point Eric Menendez was moved
somewhere else because the jail couldn't handle the additional pressure from
the press but they are both still being held awaiting retrial because there is
no bail in a capital case.
If he get's indicted for murder 1, O.J.'s going to have very cool heals
before he moves to another residence. And if he is moved before trial, it will
be into another jail.
George
|
9.2125 | Miscellaneous OJ and (former) USSR thoughts ... | RHETT::KNORR | UNIX Applications Support | Thu Jul 07 1994 15:46 | 30 |
| re: George
Awesome analogy regarding posting an anti-incumbent political sign in
yer yard. I suspect it would be tempting for 4th Amendment bashers to
minimize its significance by using the Nazi Germany (i.e. worst case)
comparison, when in actuality it protects us from everyday (potential)
abuses of power.
A few miscellaneous ramblings:
* The OJ Judge is a former prosecutor who is getting kudo's because she
did a slew of research and uncovered a fairly recent case that
supports her decision. (i.e. admitting the evidence) Neither the
defense nor prosecution uncovered the case.
* A CNN/USAToday poll shows that the vast majority of white Americans
think OJ is guilty; a significant majority of Afro-Americans (> 60%)
think he's innocent. My first reaction was how the race issue hadn't
really entered my mind. My 2nd reaction is that that's probably
becaues I'm a member of the majority race. My 3rd reaction was that
I really question the positive value of a poll like this. My 4th
(and final) thought is that I can't help but feel much of the Afro-
American sentiment is the result of big-time distrust of the LAPD.
* Any liberal who criticized Ronald Reagan for calling the Soviet
Empire "evil" never read Gulag Archipelago. I'm reading it now,
and it truly is amazing what human beings will do to one another.
- ACC Chris
|
9.2126 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 16:09 | 25 |
| > Awesome analogy regarding posting an anti-incumbent political sign in
> yer yard. I suspect it would be tempting for 4th Amendment bashers to
> minimize its significance by using the Nazi Germany (i.e. worst case)
> comparison, when in actuality it protects us from everyday (potential)
> abuses of power.
>
You've got me confused with your logic here Chris....
Why would a 4th ammendment basher use Nazi Germany as an example?
I used that example as a prime reason why you WOULD need the 4th, not as
a reason to get rid of it.....
> * The OJ Judge is a former prosecutor who is getting kudo's because she
> did a slew of research and uncovered a fairly recent case that
> supports her decision. (i.e. admitting the evidence) Neither the
> defense nor prosecution uncovered the case.
She probably just has good clerks. 8^)
|
9.2127 | Perhaps "bash" is not the right verb. "Weaken" is better. | RHETT::KNORR | UNIX Applications Support | Thu Jul 07 1994 16:31 | 21 |
| re: bad logic by ACC Chris [me]
Ha! If I were to use bad logic my mind would likely blow up like one
of those faulty computers on the 60's edition of Star Trek.
No, it makes perfect sense. Someone bashing the 4th Amendment (i.e.
trying to lesson its import) would make it appear necessary only in
"extreme" cases like the Nazi's or (much underpublicized but more
deadly by orders of magnitude) Communists, particularly (but not
limited to) Stalin.
Hence the 4th Amendment could be weakened to the point where George's
analogy could become reality.
Bottom Line: Our forefathers were an amazing collection of folks.
When you consider some of the things they put into the Constitution
it's almost like they were Harry Seldon (i.e. Psychohistorians) from
Asimov's Foundation.
- ACC Chris
|
9.2128 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Jul 07 1994 16:37 | 8 |
| Seems to me like far too often an apparent guilty person walks on
a tech, let alone the obviously guilty one's that get out early.
HUGE PROBLEM IN THIS COUNTRY, lets not even get into million doller
Gym's, cable TV, swinning etc, etc, etc...... My sister actually new
a guy who was BE into houses and couldnt wait to get caught...
MaB
|
9.2129 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jul 07 1994 16:49 | 26 |
| >Why would a 4th ammendment basher use Nazi Germany as an example?
Maybe he means this isn't Nazi Germany...???
re: the Judge's reference to another precedent
I heard only pieces of her statement, but she said the precedent case
involved police entering an apartment adjacent to a rape victim's apartment
and finding an unconcious man and evidence that led to his conviction as
the rapist. The judge said the police could enter the apartment without
a warrant because they heard music, saw lights on, there was no answer
to a knock on the door, and they had reason to believe that the person(s)
in that apartment may have been victimized as well. This Judge went on
to say that in the Simpson case, the police had a right to go to OJ's
residence because they had 2 small children at the police station, and
should be looking for their father. They then saw evidence that was
consistent with what they witnessed at the crime scene (blood drops,
the glove, blood on the bronco) and had the right to enter the residence.
...something like that
To me, the biggest problem the police and prosecution have is one mentioned
earlier: how is that 4 detectives (not street cops) go to OJ's house to
get him (to take care of the kids) ?
|
9.2130 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:00 | 13 |
| re: .2125
I would say the mistrust in the African-American
community is for the American criminal justice system
in general. It surely pre-dates Rodney King. While
there are many factors involved, there is no denying
that for a very long time, African-Americans did not
get a fair shake.
I read "Gulag" many years ago. It does amaze you that
people were treated like that, but remember that it was
a novel. I suspect that it was not a totally accurate
picture.
|
9.2131 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:01 | 20 |
| > re: bad logic by ACC Chris [me]
>
> Ha! If I were to use bad logic my mind would likely blow up like one
> of those faulty computers on the 60's edition of Star Trek.
No, I didn't say you were using bad logic. I just meant that I didn't
understand your logic. Now that you've clarified it, it makes perfect
sense to me.
> Bottom Line: Our forefathers were an amazing collection of folks.
> When you consider some of the things they put into the Constitution
> it's almost like they were Harry Seldon (i.e. Psychohistorians) from
> Asimov's Foundation.
They were at that. The insight and foresight they displayed is truly
staggering. Sometimes I wish we had just one or two like them around
today.....
|
9.2132 | Whoa Nellie | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:10 | 32 |
| <<< Note 9.2128 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
> <<< Note 9.2128 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
>
> Seems to me like far too often an apparent guilty person walks on
> a tech, let alone the obviously guilty one's that get out early.
Would you rather an innocent person get convicted because he/she is
"apparently guilty"?
I never fully appreciated the implications of "presumption of
innocence" and the need for the system to err on the side of innocence
until I sat in on jury duty last summer for a rape case.
Whether you care to admit it or not, when you sit through the
declaration of charges and look at the defendant standing to the
charges, you believe that person probably committed the crime,
otherwise it never would have come to a trial. It is nearly impossible
to believe otherwise and it's a subconscious prejudice all jurors must
overcome when listening to the evidence AS PRESENTED BY THE PROSECUTION
AND THE DEFENSE.
The system works primarily because it minimizes as much as possible, the
chances of an innocent person being wrongly convicted. It isn't
perfect, but the price is that occasionally an apparently guilty person
walks. That's a price I am willing to pay.
Remember, the jury is not convicting a person because they think he or
she is guilty. A person is found guilty *only* if the jury believes the
prosecution presented enough evidence to remove *all* reasonable doubt.
Mark.
|
9.2133 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:21 | 12 |
| Well put Mark.
I've never sat on a jury, but I think you hit the nail right on the head.
It's an ethical question -- do you set up your system to minimize the
chances of an innocent person going to jail, or to maximize the chances
that all guilty are punished even if it means an innocent man does time....
Personally, I'd rather see ten guilty men walk than suffer one innocent
man imprisioned, and I think that's what the founding fathers thought too....
|
9.2134 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:23 | 6 |
| =Bob=
"Gulag" was very much based on fact; not just a novel.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2135 | Just cause he's a great writer doesn't mean it ain't true. | RHETT::KNORR | UNIX Applications Support | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:31 | 6 |
| Correct, TCM. Alexander S includes boo-koo references to support
virtually all of his assertions, to say nothing of his personal
experiences.
- ACC Chris
|
9.2136 | Menedez is a little different, they admitted killing | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:32 | 23 |
| Im only thinking of cases were hard evidence was obtained and later
thown out on a tech.
EXM: Serial Killer, 5 Youths over 6month period killed, on a routine
traffic violation a car is illegaly searched producine evidence
that this is the killer, evidence tossed Killer walks moves to
another state, starts over...
I know this is extreme, and beleive me I know innocent poeple are
accused all the time (I was once for a small crime), but 4 of my
friends were arrested on Rape Charges, never went to court but just
what happend at the time of there arrest and in jail prior to the girl
admitting she lied and them getting out was something I would never
want to go thru...
I just dont like when HARD EVIDENCE is tossed on a Tech. If they found
the murder weapon, glove, and Mrs Simpson Blood at OJ's house and Mrs
Simpson's blood on OJ's clothes only too have all that evidence tossed
on a tech then the system didnt work, reasonable doubt is just that but
to lose on a tech is a whole new ball game...
This case will last a few years thats for sure...
mab
|
9.2137 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:54 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2128 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
> Seems to me like far too often an apparent guilty person walks on
> a tech, let alone the obviously guilty one's that get out early.
Never in the history of our country has any guilty person ever walked on a
technicality.
What has happened is that defendants have walked because the government
committed an act that violated their constitutional rights and if allowed to
stand would set a precedent that would endanger the constitutional rights of
every citizen in the nation.
They were not "guilty" because by definition they were never convicted in a
fair trial and I don't know about you but I don't consider my rights to be a
technicality.
George
|
9.2138 | Couldn't have put it any simpler | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Thu Jul 07 1994 17:57 | 3 |
| Never thought I'd say this to George, but BRAVO.
Mark.
|
9.2139 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 18:03 | 9 |
| Yeah, George -- it's rare that we agree but this time we do.
Consider the fact that for a time in France (it may still be so, I don't know)
their system of justice considered you GUILTY until you proved yourself
innocent. Imagine what that would be like trying to defend yourself.
Thank God, here in this country, the burden of proof is on the accusor,
the prosecution.....
|
9.2140 | Ideology is wonderful, but not relevant to "gray area" cases... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Thu Jul 07 1994 18:16 | 23 |
|
I don't have such a problem with the original statement and the
semantic use of the word "technicality". George himself brought
up the key word "reasonable" that the Founding Fathers used in the
Fourth Amendment definition. That means that the definition of the
word "reasonable" has always been subject to interpretation and
constitutional debate. It's nearly impossible to disagree with the
position that our constitutional rights are sacred, but the statement
is so simplistic when applied to a specific case (including this one)
as to be almost meaningless.
Yes, I think use of that word "technicality" is accurate in some cases,
if not in a strict legal sense then in a practical one, concerning
justice. Especially when you consider that laws may vary from state
to state (until challenged) where defendants in identical circumstances
may meet completely opposite fates, and that courts have been known to
make mistakes. (I know, I know, "never in the history of our country
has a court made a mistake, at the time the decision was initially
rendered...").
glenn
|
9.2141 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Thu Jul 07 1994 18:25 | 14 |
| > justice. Especially when you consider that laws may vary from state
> to state (until challenged) where defendants in identical circumstances
> may meet completely opposite fates,
Now, if we start talking about State's rights, we'll be treading on
ground that was pretty well traversed from 1861-1865....8^)
Just kidding!
'Saw
|
9.2142 | It's not a dream world... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Thu Jul 07 1994 18:47 | 11 |
|
> Now, if we start talking about State's rights, we'll be treading on
> ground that was pretty well traversed from 1861-1865....8^)
True enough... and along those lines, was it a "technicality" that our
brilliant Founding Fathers in their own world in their own time didn't
see fit to make the logical extension to women, slaves, non-property
owners... or does that fall under the category of "minor oversight"? ;-)
glenn
|
9.2143 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jul 07 1994 19:09 | 25 |
| Remember, under common law what ever applies to the process of convicting
"criminals" sets a precedent that can be used anywhere. Your "technicality" to
get a murderer behind bars becomes the license for the Sheriff to bust in and
break up your political rally. I don't know about you but I can live without
that.
As for States rights, if O.J. is convicted the decision will have to survive
in both state and federal appeals court. With 4th amendment protection, states
can make the standard more strict but they can not make it less strict.
Even if California manages to install conservative judges who allow the
conviction to stand through both the state appeals and state supreme court, the
defense will be able to apply for a writ of habius corpus in Federal District
court and have the federal judiciary test the evidence.
Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have been leaning toward the police on
this issue, but remember Byron White who was just replaced with Ruth Ginsburg
was usually on the conservative side and many of those cases were 5-4
decisions.
This issue should be close throughout the entire appeal process. At the very
least, it will cost both O.J. and the tax payers of California a bundle and
take a decade or more before this issue is resolved.
George
|
9.2144 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jul 07 1994 19:13 | 8 |
| First, excellent way of putting it George - back a few.
re: .2143
appeals: only if OJ is found guilty; a jury could find him not guilty.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2145 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 09:48 | 17 |
| > True enough... and along those lines, was it a "technicality" that our
> brilliant Founding Fathers in their own world in their own time didn't
> see fit to make the logical extension to women, slaves, non-property
> owners... or does that fall under the category of "minor oversight"? ;-)
No.
For them, in that time period, and coming from where they came from,
making that logical extension (that seems so normal to us) would have been
the equivalent of what Galileo did by asserting that the Sun was the
center of the Solar System....
That they came up with what they did, to me, is still amazing -- far-sighted,
brilliant men.
8^)
|
9.2146 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 08 1994 10:17 | 14 |
| > slaves
They did have a time limit on slavery; certainly not the right thing to do but
they did deal with the issue to some degree. Again not defending this decision
but nonetheless further than many other countries were willing to go at
that time.
> non-property owners
I'm missing this point. non-property owners could vote, be elected to office,
sit on juries, etc.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2147 | If we're weighing in, I think the judge made the right call | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Fri Jul 08 1994 10:22 | 32 |
|
> For them, in that time period, and coming from where they came from,
> making that logical extension (that seems so normal to us) would have been
> the equivalent of what Galileo did by asserting that the Sun was the
> center of the Solar System....
I generally disagree with this, but that's not really my point.
[The fathers were certainly not of one mind on these issues, and
many argued vehemently against a nation that would selectively
permit slavery, with the very same moral arguments that we would use
today and have been used since the dawn of written history-- the
study of ethics has generally not progressed over modern history.]
The point is that what they came up with was a compromise, that
included a deliberate concession of principle in some cases, which
is what common men (and not gods, circa 1787) are restricted to in
a real world. Nothing wrong with that, but they were not so
prescient (as in ACChris' Asimov novel) that major, fundamental
amendments would never be necessary. Brilliant, maybe, but certainly
not perfect.
George, I still don't think that citing a "technicality"-- and by
technicality I'm not talking about a blatant trampling of 4th
Amendment rights, but rather a mistake by the courts, or a bad law
that is subsequently changed-- sets a precedent for my home to be
invaded because of my political beliefs. And if you're applying that
opinion to the O.J. Simpson case in particular (I don't know that you
are); no, I don't see it there with yesterday's ruling, either. But
that's just my opinion...
glenn
|
9.2148 | Getting off the track, but... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Fri Jul 08 1994 10:27 | 22 |
|
>> slaves
>
> They did have a time limit on slavery; certainly not the right thing to do but
> they did deal with the issue to some degree. Again not defending this decision
> but nonetheless further than many other countries were willing to go at
> that time.
Time limit only on importation, right?
>> non-property owners
>
> I'm missing this point. non-property owners could vote, be elected to office,
> sit on juries, etc.
That's not ny understanding. Non-property owners may have been
protected by The Bill of Rights, but it's my understanding that at
the time the Constitution was written and for many years after that
in some states they did not have the right to vote, etc.
glenn
|
9.2149 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 10:35 | 58 |
| > I generally disagree with this, but that's not really my point.
> [The fathers were certainly not of one mind on these issues, and
> many argued vehemently against a nation that would selectively
> permit slavery, with the very same moral arguments that we would use
> today and have been used since the dawn of written history-- the
> study of ethics has generally not progressed over modern history.]
> The point is that what they came up with was a compromise, that
> included a deliberate concession of principle in some cases, which
> is what common men (and not gods, circa 1787) are restricted to in
> a real world. Nothing wrong with that, but they were not so
> prescient (as in ACChris' Asimov novel) that major, fundamental
> amendments would never be necessary. Brilliant, maybe, but certainly
> not perfect.
I don't disagree with you. I guess my point was that for them all
to agree to go that far would have been such a leap for some of them.
And perhaps situational ethics is not a cool thing, but I've always been
of the mind that on MOST issues, you always have to look at it in the
time period in which any situation existed. Nowadays, slavery
is abhorent, but back then, to some, it wasn't. You have to look at things
in that light, IMO. Somethings, some fundamental truths, shine bright
in any time period, but others don't always seem to....
And I agree with you -- they weren't perfect by any means. But they
stood up for what they believed in, and in my book, that's an okay thing.
re Yesterday's Ruling:
I didn't expect her to do anything less. I'm no great student
of the law, and until I write a novel about lawyers (which
I probably won't as there's too many out there now) and have to
do research I probably won't be. But to me it seemed like she
did the safe thing, erring perhaps on the side of caution, if
indeed she erred.
She's only in the municipal court, and if I've been properly
informed, the case (ie real trial) will be heard in superior
court. So she said, I'll let it in, and let them overturn
it on appeal if they like.
I'll tell you this, though. I'm getting sick of all this OJ Simpson
shit -- not in here, where you can still feel free to talk amongst yourselves
as I get verklempt, but on TV.
I'm about OJ Simpson-ed out. Maybe he killed her, maybe he didn't, but
somehow I can't fathom the Hartford Police Department following ME down
the highway at 45 mph and not blowing me away if I'm a suspect and running.
In fact, I can't picture the Hartford PD not busting into my house, shooting me
with pepper spray, and handcuffing me, and instead letting me surrender,
if I'm suspected of a double homicide.
So my feeling is getting to be let them decide whatever they want to
decide, I'm starting not to care...
|
9.2150 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 10:36 | 15 |
| > That's not ny understanding. Non-property owners may have been
> protected by The Bill of Rights, but it's my understanding that at
> the time the Constitution was written and for many years after that
> in some states they did not have the right to vote, etc.
I'd have to do some research, but you may be right.
Wasn't it sometime later that the "free, white and 21" thing came into
play regarding voting?
I remain, to borrow Kev's phrase,
Wondering if I have my college US History notes anywhere,
'Saw
|
9.2151 | Id hate to get murder by someone with $$$, Im Dead They Walk | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Jul 08 1994 10:38 | 30 |
| Id like to know how VICTIMS of GUILTY MEN WHO WALKED ON TECH's Feel
on this matter. Yes, I agree that police personal should not be able
to trash our rights, I was brought in for questioning once and kept
for about 6hrs (Never Arrested, they just drilled me and my friend for
6 hrs hoping they could get something on us..).
But Id prefer that the officer get brought up on charges for trashing
someone's rights then the GUILTY person walking on a tech.
I know awile back we talked about DRUG DEALERS/COLUMBIA/JUDGES getting
murder, well if it wasnt so EASY for drug dealers to walk on tech's
they wouldnt need to threating/kill judges. Guilty people should go
to Jail, if evidence is obtained Illegally then the Guily Officer(s)
should be punished not the Victims by allowing the Guilty person to
walk....
I know this would require a rewrite of the constitution, and I agree
that 10Guilty poeple on the street is better then 1 innocent man in
jail, but this has nothing to do with Guilty people getting out on a
tech.
I was real close to some kids that were hurt by a deal. 3 kids charged
with beating another kid, the kid who did the most damage was smart
enough to turn himself in and ple a deal, he walked on probation the
others went to jail. 1 was killed in jail, the other who was convicted
of attempted murder (Knew Karate ?) served 11 years. This is how are
justic system (Sometime) works, and how deals/tech let far too many
GUILTY people walk....
mab
|
9.2153 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 10:54 | 8 |
| I'd put forth the premise that most technicality's are caused by
someone's screwup, more than likely a cop. Train the cops better
and the screwups go down. No screwups, no technicality.....
Good point Tommy, about being just as dead....
'Saw
|
9.2154 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 08 1994 12:42 | 19 |
|
I went to the source, and here is the scoop.
The constitution (original + Bill of Rights) did not make any distinction
between property owners and non-property owners. It does leave it up
to the states to decide who votes for House and Senate. So back then the
STATES could (and some might have) have limited voting rights to property
owners.
The 14th amendment allowed all males over 21 to vote. It also states that
the number of representatives a state gets in the house depends on its
population of voters relative to the rest of the US. That means that if a
state limited who could vote they also got a smaller number of representatives.
This effectively made the states give the vote to all males over 21. Some
states then instituted things like exams and poll taxes to prevent blacks
from being able to vote, but not losing representation in the House. The
24th amendment got rid of those barriers.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2155 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 12:46 | 5 |
| re .2154
Well, Met, if you lose your job here I see some legal clerking
in your future......8^)
|
9.2156 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Jul 08 1994 13:41 | 10 |
|
I've got the TV on in the other room....
OJ's DNA and that from the blood on the side walk are a match.
The criminologist is on the stand and the number .043% is being
discussed. Apparently, 99.57% of the population can be excluded as a
match��,.
Mark.
|
9.2157 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 13:46 | 9 |
| > OJ's DNA and that from the blood on the side walk are a match.
>
> The criminologist is on the stand and the number .043% is being
> discussed. Apparently, 99.57% of the population can be excluded as a
> match��,.
Stick a fork in him, he's done......
|
9.2158 | | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Fri Jul 08 1994 13:47 | 11 |
| >> The criminologist is on the stand and the number .043% is being
>> discussed. Apparently, 99.57% of the population can be excluded as a
>> match��,.
Small nit:
If .043% is right then you must mean 99.957% being excluded.
billl
|
9.2159 | I'm still bitter about it... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:01 | 12 |
|
> So back then the
> STATES could (and some might have) have limited voting rights to property
> owners.
That's basically what I said, Met, that the Founding Fathers had little
regard for peon immigrant stock like the Waugamains, Philadelphia 1725,
who had no representation but could be and were clubbed over the head
and dragged off to jail with (almost) no justification...
glenn
|
9.2160 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:08 | 12 |
| >
> That's basically what I said, Met, that the Founding Fathers had little
> regard for peon immigrant stock like the Waugamains, Philadelphia 1725,
> who had no representation but could be and were clubbed over the head
> and dragged off to jail with (almost) no justification...
>
Hey, just because them Philadelphians didn't like your great-great-great-great-
great grandfather's trick of resting a beer on your great-great-grea-great
grandfather's head doesn't mean you should be bitter....8^)
|
9.2161 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:10 | 6 |
| Billl, my mistake.... 0.43 it is.
Multiply .0043 x the population of the greater LA area and you know how
many people *could* have a match.
Mark.
|
9.2162 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:11 | 29 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2151 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
> Id like to know how VICTIMS of GUILTY MEN WHO WALKED ON TECH's Feel
> on this matter.
There are none, it never happens. These men (and women) walked because the
police screwed up the evidence by violating the perpetrators constitutional
rights. How can you call your constitutional rights a technicality?
> ...This is how are
> justice system (Sometime) works, and how deals/tech let far too many
> GUILTY people walk....
This is another myth.
In spite of the tough rules on evidence the number of people incarcerated is
increasing dramatically at a time when every jurisdiction in the country is
struggling to balance their budget.
In 1980 there were something like 350,000 people sitting in jails, prisons,
and houses of correction around the country. By 1990 that number was up to
600,000. It's pushing 1 million now and with all the truth in sentencing
regulations coming along it will not doubt go much higher.
It's the tax payers who pick up the bill for housing all of those people. We
do NOT need a system where still more people get put into prison. We just plain
can't afford it.
George
|
9.2163 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:17 | 7 |
| It's too bad we can't make the prisoners who are there actually earn
their keep. But if we did that, they'd complain that their rights are
being violated.....
If it were up to me, I'd just bring back the chain gangs.....8^)
|
9.2164 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:24 | 13 |
| It wouldn't be cost justified. Remember, most of them are unskilled labor and
difficult to control in a cell, never mind in a large work environment with
tools.
Add to that the fact that you'd be taking a job from the private sector and
giving it to someone who is state help. As with any state job the bureaucracy
needed to control these workers would go out of sight.
No, it's cheaper to have them just sit there and do nothing.
It's cheaper still to figure out a way to release the less violent offenders.
George
|
9.2165 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:37 | 3 |
| > It's cheaper still to figure out a way to release the less violent offenders.
Ammunition is cheap....8^)
|
9.2166 | You did say *almost* nothing .... Haw! | RHETT::KNORR | UNIX Applications Support | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:40 | 6 |
| So what crimes were your relatives Guilty of, Waugamain?
Inquiring minds and all ....
- ACC Chris
|
9.2167 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:41 | 23 |
| > Add to that the fact that you'd be taking a job from the private sector and
>giving it to someone who is state help. As with any state job the bureaucracy
>needed to control these workers would go out of sight.
Well, yes and no, I think.
I look at things like patching holes on highways. Around here, there's not
enough town money in most of the towns to get all the patching done in
anything resembling a timely manner. In fact, a couple of towns just
throw up "road under construction" signs on all the roads leading into
town to limit their liability, and leave the holes till they can get to
them.
It don't take a lot of skill to do that (I know, cause I've done it), and
there aren't any openings anyway. So let the guys doing time come
out on a chain gang and patch 'em up.
They actually had a program going like that in a town in Western Mass I think
and while it was controversial, it was working. Granted, that was at
a town level, but it could work....
'Saw
|
9.2168 | Ever hear of Shay's rebellion, Crisp? ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:52 | 1 |
|
|
9.2169 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | The Wind Cries Mary | Fri Jul 08 1994 14:54 | 3 |
| At least they fought for something worthwhile Glenn (i.e. whiskey).
/Don
|
9.2170 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:01 | 35 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2167 by CAMONE::WAY "Pop quiz..." >>>
>I look at things like patching holes on highways. Around here, there's not
>enough town money in most of the towns to get all the patching done in
>anything resembling a timely manner.
It wouldn't work. Think of the costs involved.
To patch holes in a highway you probably need 4 guys, an engineer or foreman
who can figure out how to do it, a couple guys to drive the truck and work the
shovels and a cop to direct traffic.
Now how many guys would it take to get violent prisoners armed with shovels
to fill in the holes?
You still need the guy who knows how it's done. He probably needs a non
prison assistant to help him prepare the stuff and drive the truck and you
still need a cop to direct traffic. Ok, you've saved one guy.
Now because the prisoners are outside (2 per crew?) you probably need at
least two guards with them full time. That's a 1:1 ratio of guards to
prisoners. Then there's a prison van and someone to drive it, staff workers at
the town and at the prisons to figure out where to send the prisoners, someone
to bring them food, an extra cop to keep the civilians away from the prisoners
and possibly medical personal because of restrictions on men in captivity
being in a non-controled location.
And we haven't even started adding the lawyers involved when the teamsters
union get's wind of the fact that prisoners are taking away someone's job.
Let's see, instead of 4 guys to fill holes and not counting the prisoners
themselves I count 10-12 people including lawyers and paramedics to fill your
potholes.
George
|
9.2171 | mes apologies, Kinky Friedman made me do it | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:06 | 6 |
| Since it's going to go on for years how about an OJ Simpson Trial note?
btw If only OJ had the lawyer who saved the guy on the sodomy charge
got it reduced to following to closely
|
9.2172 | They di in GA | SAHQ::ZOGRAN | | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:06 | 8 |
| Here in beautiful Georgia they use prisoners to clean up trash on the
roadways and do some light construction. Ususally 8 -10 guys, a prison
bus and a shotgun totin' guard.
FWIW
UMDan
|
9.2173 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:11 | 12 |
| Pretty graphic testimony in progress from the medical examiner who
conducted the autopsy. Camera pans of OJ show a man not having a good
day.
FF warning for the squeamish...
The infamous neck wound on Nicole Simpson was 8.5" long and 2.5" wide,
from the base of the neck in the front to the tip of the right ear
lobe. Her neck was severed clean through to the spinal column.
Mark.
|
9.2174 | Back to the normally scheduled program | OLD1S::SYSTEM | | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:27 | 9 |
|
In Texas they make most work on farms growing the food they eat,along
with making license plates. Prison farms dot the counties in around the Max
in Huntsville. I lived near a farm in Sugarland outside of Houston. They
also raise the beef ,pork and poultry they eat. The farm guards set on horses
with 30-30's and six shooters on the hip, some carry a sawed off 20 gauge for
persuader.
Cadzilla2
|
9.2175 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:32 | 21 |
| Okay, a few things.
Let's try to move the OJ stuff to the jurisprudence note. Just post
your replies there instead of here...
re chain gangs and stuff, just a couple of points ---
o down here, municipal work like that in most
towns is not union
o they did it in Mass, they do it in Ga.
o I'd settle for the "prison farm" concept.
NFL related:
Giants are gonna suck this year.....8^)
|
9.2176 | Just don't let Simms sign with the 'Skins | SAHQ::ZOGRAN | | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:47 | 4 |
| Why is this year any different than any other year for the NJ Giants?
:-)
UMDan
|
9.2177 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:53 | 17 |
| > -< Just don't let Simms sign with the 'Skins >-
>
> Why is this year any different than any other year for the NJ Giants?
> :-)
Do me, you TWERP.
The Foreskins haven't had a decent QB since Sonny Jurgenson, and even
he sucked. Rypien couldn't carry Simms jock on a good day, and
I'll never ever forget that wonderful feeling as Jay Schroeder swooned
after the Giants defense kicked the sh*t outta him in 86 in the
championship game.....
Actually, the problem with the Giants this season is their coach.....
The Field Goal Coach (TFGC) Dan Reeves....
|
9.2178 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 15:54 | 7 |
| Sorry, UMDan, I forgot to put the 8^)'s in my note. They were most
definitely implied, even if I don't always use them...(like Tommy)
8^)
'Saw
|
9.2179 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:00 | 8 |
|
|The Foreskins haven't had a decent QB since Sonny Jurgenson, and even
|he sucked. Rypien couldn't carry Simms jock on a good day, and
Sonny was a good QB. He had a great arm, but was definitly on the
MisterPotatoHaid scale for speed/quickness.
Billy Kilmer, on the other hand, sipped.
|
9.2180 | Jack Kent Cooke will get you! | SAHQ::ZOGRAN | | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:03 | 8 |
| Sort of figured that you either forgot em (8^)), or you were just
having a bad day, or that you realize that the 'Skins will rise from
the ashes and smoke de Giants this season!:-)
Wait til 9/18 @4:00pm
UMDan
|
9.2182 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:12 | 4 |
| Nit:
If memory serves me, Kilmer played QB on the George Allen teams. He stepped in
when Sonny got too old and fat. Theisman came after Kilmer, I beleive.
|
9.2183 | | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:19 | 9 |
| Well, shiver me timbers! There's actually NFL talk goin' on here!
I don't see anyone being heads and shoulders above any other team
this year. Specially since the Cowboys have scattered in the wind.
Should see lots of .500 teams in the 'offs.
billl
|
9.2184 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:24 | 15 |
| UMDan (I'm so tempted to use the TWERP comment!) 8^)
Yeah, I forgot them. It usually takes a lot to get me all in a huff, and
it's been rare in SPORTS that that happens, although Tommy does tempt me
sometimes....
Theismann was pretty good....
Simms, if anything, is underrated, because he's never been overrated
inthe press.....
'saw
|
9.2185 | Simms is okay | SAHQ::ZOGRAN | | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:34 | 13 |
| My note regarding Simms was partly in jest. I realyy wouldn't mind
seeing him on the 'Skins. God knows he beat us enough.
Regarding .500 teams in the playoffs -
At least Football will have a playoff (Baseball probably won't, but
thats another topic no doubt)
I wonder how long it will take for people (Owners in particluar) to
realize that the cap ain't all thats it was cracked up to be. IMO.
UMDan
|
9.2186 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:51 | 7 |
| Which teams should improve?
Which teams should get worse?
Who are the rookies to watch?
George
|
9.2187 | "Why I Prefer Soccer", by Matt Bahr (hey, Mac's not here) ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:54 | 11 |
|
> Actually, the problem with the Giants this season is their coach.....
> The Field Goal Coach (TFGC) Dan Reeves....
How does that differ from Bill Parcells, whose idea of the perfect game
is 250 yards on the ground and a perfect FG conversion rate inside the
40? Who can ever forget Parcells' finest effort: Matt Bahr 15, San
Francisco 49ers 13.
glenn
|
9.2188 | | MKFSA::LONG | and the thunder roooooooolllls.... | Fri Jul 08 1994 16:58 | 10 |
| >> How does that differ from Bill Parcells, whose idea of the perfect game
>> is 250 yards on the ground and a perfect FG conversion rate inside the
>> 40? Who can ever forget Parcells' finest effort: Matt Bahr 15, San
>> Francisco 49ers 13.
End result is the key, Glenn. Parcell's team gets the 'W', and
the 49ers get the 'L'.
billl
|
9.2190 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | one bourbon,one scotch, and one beer | Fri Jul 08 1994 17:09 | 5 |
|
Theisman is one of the most overated QB's of all time. LT is my
favorite player just because of that one play on Monday night.
brews
|
9.2191 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Fri Jul 08 1994 17:13 | 17 |
|
The point is, though, that Reeves did very well last year, far better
than he had any business doing. I never thought much of him when he
was with the Broncos, but last year made me give pause. We'll see how
it goes in the future...
However, in total seriousness, the NFL as a whole does need to address
the "field goal problem". Looking at an individual team, you're only
concerned about wins and losses, but overall as a sport you don't want
the game to continue to devolve into one of field goals just because
that might have been a successful formula for a few teams. I've heard
soccer supporters claim that if you just counted up the TDs on each
side, the game scores in the NFL are no higher than in soccer, and at
least with last year's NFL that is absolutely correct...
glenn
|
9.2193 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Fri Jul 08 1994 17:13 | 11 |
| Parcells beat Reeves, that's why.
Parcells offense FIT the conditions that he played in. December in Giants
Stadium isn't time to be hanging out the pigskin.
But, to me the difference is that Parcells did whatever it took to win,
whatever it took, and would go for it in big places. Reeves doesn't strike
me that way at all.....
'Saw
|
9.2194 | No (8^)*'s here!!!!! | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jul 08 1994 17:18 | 30 |
|
>> <<< Note 9.2163 by CAMONE::WAY "Pop quiz..." >>>
>>It's too bad we can't make the prisoners who are there actually earn
>>their keep. But if we did that, they'd complain that their rights are
>>being violated.....
>>If it were up to me, I'd just bring back the chain gangs.....8^)
IMHO, we need to go back to when peoples loathed the thought of prison.
Back when the prison was not a freakin' hotel where some a$$hole could
go after committing a heinous crime, get college educated at the
taspayers expense, live in an air conditioned cell, watch CABLE tv, and
eat our money for his f_ck up.
Give em bread and water, make em smash rocks, only let them watch
Richard Simmons reruns on the tube, turn on the heat in the summer, and
the AC in the winter. Remove the carpeting from their cells.
MAke prison a deterrent. If they riot fer better conditions, nuke
them.
Commit a crime, PAY for it with some ROUGH time. And a big guy named
BUBBA taking you fer his love slave.
JaKe
|
9.2195 | :-) | SAHQ::ZOGRAN | | Fri Jul 08 1994 17:19 | 4 |
| re .2190 - You are indeed a cold person, Brews. Do you watch NASCAR
events for the crashes?
UMDan
|
9.2196 | right MikeyH? | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 08 1994 17:20 | 4 |
| yo JaKe, you forgot about making 'em only listen to Air Supply :-)
The Crazy Met
|
9.2198 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jul 08 1994 17:24 | 4 |
| Thanks fer reminding me, TCsomething.
JaKe
|
9.2199 | Chip-shot field goal: most boring play in football | 4156::G_WAUGAMAN | Inside de net! Inside de net! | Fri Jul 08 1994 18:15 | 31 |
|
> As for the NFL, soccer people are really reaching with
> that one.
This wasn't in some kind of a comparison of the games, just in response
to the criticisms that there's too little scoring in soccer. On that
very narrow (and narrow-minded) criticism at least, the point is correct.
There isn't that much scoring in the NFL, either.
I'm not convinced that scoring in the NFL will continue to be as bad as
last year, but there's no denying that the accuracy of FG kickers and
the number of points they score has steadily risen in the last 20 years
without relapse. Factors that have contributed like artificial turf
and domed stadiums are not a phase. I know I'm not pleased and I
believe that this trend is for the worst. I'd rather see teams play
aggressively (and make defenses respond aggressively) and have to punt
than see field goals.
I favor a very simple, fundamental change to make a field goal
worth 2 points as opposed to some contrivance that messes with the
essence of play on the field. However, this would be considered too
radical to the league powers, who would rather tinker with the rules
as they have over the years (just the thought of messing with the
scoring system would send Don Shula into apoplexy!). But if you look
at what the TD-to-FG ratio has dwindled to, a FG just does not merit
3 points any longer (even the 2 points is conservative). Currently,
it's so much easier to pick up two FGs to approximately offset a TD
than to take risks...
glenn
|
9.2200 | On No, Not Richard Simmons again | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jul 08 1994 18:33 | 6 |
| re: .2194
As usual, JaKe, you've got a way with words. Well said.
Keith
|
9.2201 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | one bourbon,one scotch, and one beer | Fri Jul 08 1994 19:12 | 9 |
| > If he's so overrated then why did they name the Theisman Trophy
> after him ?!!?!?
Actually, Tommy, and I expect that you may know this, he named himself
after the trophy. He changed the pronounciation of his name in college
from ThEEsman while at ND. Two more reasons not to like him in that one
sentence.
brews
|
9.2202 | No more OJ, PLEASE!!! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Welcome to the Machine | Sat Jul 09 1994 09:20 | 15 |
| Reeves only did good last year because he walked into a run oriented
offense that can run block. He never had that in Denver and never did
anything to improve that.
Watch him over the next few years and see if he screws up the jints
OL. I'm not sure what control he has over the draft and FA, but if he
has most of the say so, then he will find a way to mess thing up.
Camps open up over the next 2 weeks!!!
I'm looking forward to my beloved Donks to score some big points this
year. I'm not looking forward to watching them give up big points this
year.
Tim
|
9.2203 | Camp Opens | DELNI::FORGET | | Mon Jul 11 1994 09:52 | 15 |
|
Back to our regularly scheduled Conference on the NFL
LA Raiders & Rams open Rookie Camp yesterday.
Jimmy Jonhson turned down Buddy Ryan offer as a defense coach
Phil Simms is supposed to announce his retirement this week
O.J. Simspon deserves his own topic, he's no longer part of the NFL
Mike
|
9.2204 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pop quiz... | Mon Jul 11 1994 10:09 | 34 |
| re the last few:
Glenn, I know what you mean about the FG. It can make for
some exciting finishes sometimes (like the Daluiso shot against
the Cards last year) but too often it's the safe way out
for coaches like Reeves.
In rugby a couple of years ago, they changed the scoring because
with a converted try being worth 6 points and a penalty kick
(sort of a FG) being worth 3, it was too easy for teams to
play it safe and go for the tie, instead of attempting to work
hard to score the try. They changed a converted try to 7 points
and it made some incentive. I don't know what they can do
similarly in the NFL with scoring.
regarding Reeves:
No, Tommy, you're wrong. I never liked Reeves when he was with
the Broncos and I didn't like it when they brought him in.
Thank George Young for that fiasco. Reeves is pretty ineffective
in situations where you need him to be -- ie playoffs last year.
Last year he brought a highly undisciplined team into order
and they performed, but not well. There were flashes of
ineptitude all over the place.
Personally, I think George Young is more of a detriment to
the Giants than Reeves, since George outlived his usefulness
long ago......
'Saw
|
9.2205 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Movin' on up, to the east side... | Mon Jul 11 1994 10:13 | 2 |
| Giant-Jets game is 20-AUG...
|
9.2206 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Jul 11 1994 11:40 | 7 |
|
> LA Raiders & Rams open Rookie Camp yesterday.
gag! we're not even half way through July. truly sick.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2207 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Gonna bang some heads... | Mon Jul 11 1994 12:20 | 2 |
| Exhibition games start end of the month, right?
|
9.2209 | 20 more days till football | OURGNG::RIGGEN | BP says wampum from quantum good deal | Mon Jul 11 1994 13:05 | 7 |
| July 31, 1994 in Barcelona Spain
Denver Bronco's Against Los Angeles Raiders
Jeff
|
9.2210 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Gonna bang some heads... | Mon Jul 11 1994 13:49 | 2 |
| What was the score in that Fog game last year? Wasn't that 6-0 or 6-3?
|
9.2211 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Jul 11 1994 14:20 | 11 |
| > OJ's DNA and that from the blood on the side walk are a match.
>
> The criminologist is on the stand and the number .043% is being
> discussed. Apparently, 99.57% of the population can be excluded as a
> match��,.
Small nit,
These still aren't the results of DNA testing, which can pinpoint to
approximately 1 in 1,000,000. This pinpoints to ~1 in 200 (which means
there are still tens of thousands of people in the L.A. area who could
have committed the crime, based on the blood tests alone).
|
9.2212 | when my next vacation? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Let Love Have It's Way | Tue Jul 12 1994 14:51 | 15 |
|
Tommy and Glenn, please check last year's Giants' schedule before tooting
Reeves' horn. Toss in the fact that traditional tough divisional rivals
Redskins and Eagles were abysmal and I think you'll find that dannyboy
was less than brillant.
While I was never a big Parcells' booster as Saw said atleast the man had
the 'nads to gamble and play to his strength (ie: Between the tackles).
I'll bet my last buck that the first play from scrimmage this year will
be an endsweep.......
Also Parcells had a sense of humor. Reeves doesn't have one and is whinner.
mike
|
9.2213 | Reeves is a GENIUS! | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | The Wind Cries Mary | Wed Jul 13 1994 12:26 | 1 |
|
|
9.2214 | Packers | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Thu Jul 14 1994 16:39 | 6 |
|
Brett Favre re-signed with the Pack for $19M over 5 years.
I thought this guy was just a flash in the pan?
Kevin
|
9.2215 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jul 14 1994 16:40 | 4 |
| any of that money guaranteed??
The Crazy Met
|
9.2216 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Thu Jul 14 1994 16:47 | 6 |
| I doubt it. The NFL isn't into guaranteed money like baseball.
Farve had a good season 2 years ago, but slipped last year. That's
a pretty big contract for someone with questionable consistency.
Mike
|
9.2217 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jul 14 1994 16:50 | 9 |
|
> The NFL isn't into guaranteed money like baseball.
agreed.
Now that there is free agency I wonder if this will start to change.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2218 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Thu Jul 14 1994 17:08 | 3 |
| Ala Scott Mitchell...
Chip_GSH_Bach
|
9.2219 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Let Love Have It's Way | Fri Jul 15 1994 09:28 | 5 |
|
Bret slipped last year because he made dumb mistakes not because he lacked
talent. As Chip said as a starting qb he got the going rate.........
mike
|
9.2220 | Donks will lose to faids again\ | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Welcome to the Machine | Fri Jul 15 1994 20:13 | 6 |
| re-1 MikeC
Reeves was running end around onj 1st and 10? In Denver it was always
up the middle. How about that shovel pass?
Tim
|
9.2221 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Let Love Have It's Way | Mon Jul 18 1994 09:47 | 5 |
|
yeah Tim, the sweep was his favorite play. A few shovel passes but not as
many as in Denver.
mike
|
9.2222 | Curtis Duncan | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Mon Jul 25 1994 13:07 | 7 |
| The Packers signed Curtis Duncan, WR out of Houston over the
weekend. How good is he. Is he an adequate complement to
Sharpe? I really don't know a lot about him.
The Pack is looking really good to me though!
Tony
|
9.2223 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | You gotta put down the duckie... | Mon Jul 25 1994 14:26 | 12 |
| | The Pack is looking really good to me though!
I dunno. I'd love to see them in the 'offs again, but I have concerns about
the offense. The lack of a running game will expose Brett Farve's weakness
(his decisions in passign situations).
Meanwhile, Minnesota got a real QB, and Detroit looks better, if for no other
reason than they will have only one first string QB.
But I'll be optimistic too.
=Bob=
|
9.2224 | Should be a deffinate PLUS | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Jul 25 1994 16:34 | 7 |
| Curtis Duncan was coming along AWSOMELY with Houston a few years back.
He was coming along great, then got injured, when they wernt sure about
him coming back they grabbed slaughter. So with
Givins/Jeffreis/Slaughter they didnt start/play duncan too much. But
he should be able to help GB alot...
MaB
|
9.2225 | Running Game Looks Better On Paper | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Tue Jul 26 1994 14:06 | 12 |
| re: .2223
I think the running game will be improved. The Pack was
ravaged at O-line last year. This year, they have acquired
Guy McIntyre and a couple others. Of course, it would be
nice if Aaron Taylor hadn't got injured (the 1st round draft
choice). Also, the Pack acquired Reggie Cobb from Tampa
Bay and LeShon Johnson in the draft.
I think the running game will be noticeably improved.
Tony
|
9.2226 | | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Jul 26 1994 14:22 | 15 |
| man TB is in trouble, they lose cobb, Dilfer may go back to college
and Ericc Rhett is a holdout (Still)... Chock up a couple easy wins
for the NFC Central Teams.
The Central will be a very intresting division. Theyve had 3
competative (Playoff Race) teams in Detroit/Minny/GB all 3 teams
seemed to have improved. Detroit added a QB, they have solid WR's and
an awsome RB. Minny Added Moon, cant get a much better QB then that
although the WR's are suspect (and the running game). And GB appears
to have improved the most. Chicago and TB could be in trouble this
season. The NFC West would appear to have steeped down a notch, maybe
You have NYG, DAL and Wash losing key players and phoenix/philly could
be the new teams in the east...Hey maybe the AFC will win one..
MaB
|
9.2227 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Jul 26 1994 16:10 | 32 |
| re: NFC West
I think Atlanta has made some improvements during the off-season, so they
have the potential for contending for a wildcard spot. But they also have
a new coach, new QB, and only 1 returning WR in a 4-WR offense.
The NFC playoff contenders are probably:
East: Dallas, Phoenix, Philly (because of Kotite)
Central: GB, Detroit, Minnesota
West: SF, Atlanta
I think Dallas and SF will win their divisions, and Phoenix will be the
best 2nd-place team. That leaves a real dog-fight for the Central crown,
and the other 2 wildcard spots.
The AFC power appears to be in the West, with KC, Denver and the Raiders
all legitimate Super Bowl teams. I think Buffalo will make the playoffs,
but if Marino is healthy, Miami could unseat them at the top of the East.
Throw out Cincinati, and the Central is a 'pick-em'. Who knows what to
expect out of Houston, with a new QB and new offense.
In the AFC:
East: Miami, Buffalo, Jets, Pats ?
Central: Pitts, Houston, Cleveland
West: Denver, Raiders, KC
|
9.2228 | | PTOVAX::SCHRAMM | | Wed Jul 27 1994 12:59 | 7 |
|
FWIW (and this is probably the kiss of death) Pittsburgh was predicted
second (behind KC) as the AFC team most likely to go to the Super Bowl.
Even without that prediction (and depending on injuries), the AFC
Central is a fight between Pittsburgh and Cleveland. Free agency,
trades and coaching changes makes Houston questionable and Cincinnatti
- give them 2 years.
|
9.2229 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Thu Jul 28 1994 16:45 | 14 |
|
>>Central is a fight between Pittsburgh and Cleveland. Free agency,
This may come backl to haunt me, but, barring the STEELERS getting
riddled with injuries, I don't see Clevescum giving the STEELERS much
fight this year fer the AFC Central. The Brown(spot)s(tm) are a 8-8
team or worse. The STEELERS should finish at 10-6 or better.
I'll eat my crow if I have to(and I'm still here) in January.
But, I don't think I'll have to.
JaKe
|
9.2230 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Jul 28 1994 16:51 | 17 |
|
(Note: spellings corrected. B^)
> This may come back to haunt me, but, barring the Steelers getting
> riddled with injuries, I don't see Cleveland giving the Steelers much
> fight this year for the AFC Central. The Browns are an 8-8
> team or worse. The Steelers should finish at 10-6 or better.
I hate to say, but I agree with you w.r.t. the Browns - IMHO they
are going _nowhere_ while Belichek's still there. I hope I'm
wrong, or at least that Belichek leaves quickly...
I'm not so certain the Steelers are a lock to get 10 wins, either,
though.
Joe
|
9.2231 | AFC Central...Very Weak!! | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Fri Jul 29 1994 09:50 | 3 |
| Come to think of it, has any division EVER been as weak as
the AFC Central in terms of how good the quarterbacks are?
In fact, who are the running backs? What a weak division!!
|
9.2232 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jul 29 1994 11:39 | 5 |
| Well, not in football, but the AL West this year sure ranks right up
there.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2233 | Worst of the worst | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Jul 29 1994 11:49 | 2 |
| The National League Worst is almost as bad as the AL Worst. Each have
four losing teams. The AL "wins" because of California and Seattle.
|
9.2234 | | MKFSA::LONG | got some ocean front property in Arizona | Fri Jul 29 1994 12:16 | 4 |
| AL West, NFC West, what's the difference, they both sip.
billl
|
9.2235 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Aug 09 1994 10:16 | 6 |
|
Deon Sanders spent the night in the pokie after allegedly dragging
a cop 20 feet on his mototcycle.
Kevin
|
9.2236 | it was his 27th birthday too | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Aug 09 1994 13:25 | 1 |
|
|
9.2237 | Time for colleges to quit being pushed around by pros | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Aug 10 1994 17:00 | 16 |
| I'm surprised the colleges don't simply take the bull by the horns and
sign players to four year contracts which can then be resold at a
profit to the nfl, somewhat similar to what minor league teams did
before the reserve clause and depression allowed major leagues to put
independent minor league owners out of business.
But colleges are to big to be pushed around and could justify signings
as being best for all around (the money out of drew bledsoes pocket
would go to a 5th or 6th (equivelent, there'd be no such thing as a
draft, rather the other way around) round player.
And the profits would go into music, arts, women's sports and signings
could pay tuitions/scholarships.
George will obviously agree with this, what's wrong other than the
obvious puncturing of some prides and putting agents out of business.
|
9.2239 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Aug 10 1994 17:23 | 3 |
| What's the advantage to the player?
George
|
9.2240 | Big question is will college fans support non-amateur status | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Aug 10 1994 18:15 | 35 |
| As you say Tommy there's enough corruption in college today to risk
more or less but this (new) "corruption" would be above the table.
The player would get whatever amount of college he wanted free while
matriculating; he would have to attend 10-15 hours of class per week
but could audit. He would receive a combination of base and merit pay
the latter rewarded on performance and output.
The players advantage would be he would be paid honestly while
attending college "free".
He would have true leverage in terms of a percentage of the amount of
his contract bought by the professional club. HE WOULD BE A FREE AGENT
at the end of the contract unless the contract was bought out by the
pro club.
Length of contract: 5 years from date of hs grad./18th birthday
Again: the agents would be locked out until the point of contract
expiration/contract buyout.
The complicated part is the method by which players select
colleges/vv(?) and colleges deal with pro teams.
Players benefit because they are now represented in any player-owner
contracts by default by the colleges who have an incentive (or at least
an interest).
The Drew Bledsoes might have to wait until they have proven themselves
before reaping big bucks but since they are free-agents (> 5 yrs totally )
they'll reap even bigger bucksj.
Most hurt will be the Eugene Chungs whose overpricing at draft time
forces their teams to do on the job training to get their money back at
the expense of better players.
|
9.2241 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Aug 11 1994 11:22 | 26 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2240 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> The players advantage would be he would be paid honestly while
> attending college "free".
About the only thing different is the "honestly". They are already "paid" and
receive a free education. And if they get caught it's the school that pays any
penalties (suspension what ever) not the player.
> Players benefit because they are now represented in any player-owner
> contracts by default by the colleges who have an incentive (or at least
> an interest).
They are better off with an agent. The agent profits by acting on behalf of
the player and if they don't do that the player can fire the agent and hire a
different one. The player is worse off if they are represented by a college that
will be acting on their own behalf.
The big problem here is that the pro-college crowd will hate the idea since
it takes away the "purity" of college sports (what ever that means) and the
athletes won't like it because they don't really benefit.
On the plus side, this idea is bound to be so unpopular that it can't be
all bad. :*)}
George
|
9.2243 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Aug 11 1994 12:15 | 20 |
| Ok Tommy, you're right. Since I don't have the numbers handy that proves
that in the "pure" world of college sports, football players never get perks
that the average EE major doesn't get. Life on campus for the Quarterback
is no different from some kid working his way through trying to get a degree
in Business Administration or Math.
It's all just those fine young men playing for honor, for their country,
and for their school ... wait, I'm choking up ... I'm misting ...
"Bright College years we sing to thee,
Those golden years that quickly flee,
Bright shinning moments of our youth,
Were we can seek, the truth.
May what we learned through toil and strife
Direct our foot steps and our life
No man can ask for more than this
We sing to thee, Ol' Miss..."
George
|
9.2245 | the plan (continued) | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Aug 11 1994 13:01 | 38 |
| Tommy,
Wherever you get a situation where an athlete is worth thousands of
dollars to play for an institution and is supposed to be getting nada
then the chances are some money is going to change hands. I would
agree that Foley and even Flutie who was worth millions to BC received
nothing illegal.
Anecdotal evidence of payouts such as the Dave Megyesey (sic) book
don't seem to be as prevalent today as yesteryear. Does that mean the
money isn't there - I sincerely doubt it.
But one thing is certain. It would be very difficult for college
institutions to come out of the closet and become full fledged
professional sports businesses (de jure as opposed to de facto).
But players do sign contracts today (letter of intent, ncaa
agreement to abide by rules), colleges act as minor league for
basketball and baseball for nada (except for pros allowing colleges to
do the initial freshman signings), players have no input on where they
will work after college if they choose to continue with there sport as a
professional, cream of the crop gets most of the draft money; lower
rounds basically get screwed...(and on and on)
My basic point was that a college would own a signed contract to
play football for a salary which would have to be bought out while in
force by the professional team(s) selected by the player to participate
in the AUCTION of the contract. The buyout price goes mainly to the
player with a cut to the college but for seniors it would be a one year
contract. Unless renogotiated that buyout price would cover the
players pro salary (the "cream" would all renegotiate thru agents with
essentially the same rights they have today (play or sit at home - how
did Buddy Ryan put it to Miller the other day?)
If the nfl still chose to draft contracted players the college
would simply ignore it and if owners colluded against the system the
ncaa would blow their doors off in court.
billthe
|
9.2246 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Aug 11 1994 13:46 | 33 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2244 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> Go back and read the testimony, George. Nobody said that the world of
> college sport was "pure".
I've heard many people talk about how college and amateur sport was better
than professional sport because it was "somehow more pure". No one could ever
define "somehow".
>However, you did say (again) that all college
> athletes are paid. Of course, you have no proof.
No, I said that college football players are paid. I never suggested that
the guys that play the less popular sports are paid. And they are paid, what do
you think a sports scholarship is? If you agree to go play football for a
school with an aggressive football program you don't pay to go to school, they
pay all your bills and give you a free ride.
>Your dislike for college
> athletics is enough for you to make such blanket statements.
I don't dislike college sports, they are fine. I dislike hypocrisy. College
basketball and college football is minor league basketball and football for the
NBA and NFL respectively. It is not something that is just there for the
enjoyment of the kids on campus and it's not a typical college activity who's
purpose is to build character.
It's purpose is to make money and feed players into the pros and that's fine.
That being the case, many of the rules are outdated. Why penalize teams for
acting like professional teams that have little to do with the average kid
on campus when that's clearly what they are?
George
|
9.2248 | Only 1 night of baseball left :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Aug 11 1994 14:05 | 25 |
| A FULL FOOTBALL SCHOLERSHIP CAN BE Tuition, Housing, Books, Food etc
IF you add that all up Im sure 30-50K per year is quite possible
Id say thats getting paid, and this is just the Legal part of it
there's alot of Illegal funds/favors that switch hands and if you
think otherwise were talking BIG TIME lack of common sense.
Lets take this one step further, someone brought up Doug Flutie.
BC made Upteen Millions off of flutie from football revenues, but what
did Doug Make off of BC... EVERYTHING HE HAS. Let's say Doug doesnt
get a Football Scholership and plays QB for some jr college, does he
get drafted in the NFL, maybe but not that high, therefore without the
big name/contract he proberbly doesnt make the team (This statement of
course based on his accomplishment in the NFL).
So without BC more the likly no NFL, no CFL, no $$$$. He's made more
off BC then BC made off him... Plus he got an education (I hope) for
free, whats the current price tag for 4 years at BC (everything
included tuition/housing/books/food etc) ???
Id have to agree with George, they get paid, ask any father trying to
send his non athletic child to a big time school and they will surely
agree...
mab
|
9.2249 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Aug 11 1994 14:10 | 25 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2247 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> They are already paid *AND* receive a free education. Note the "and".
> "And" meaning "in addition to".
This reminds me of a story I heard about when the army 1st started trying to
communicate with computers. A general had his flunky type in a question asking
>Are they coming by land or sea.
The response of course was
:YES
>Yes what?
:YES SIR.
> You say this quite often completely ignoring that 98% of all college
> athletes go on to careers other than pro sports.
So big deal, most guys playing A ball go on to careers other than the Major
Leagues. That's the nature of any minor league including college sports.
George
|
9.2251 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Aug 11 1994 17:42 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2250 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> It's also BC and UConn and California and Stan-
> ford and some other very fine institutions that don't "pay" their athletes
> anything. Unless you have proof that they do. I'm sure you don't just your
> own little agenda.
These colleges have no sports scholorships?
George
|
9.2253 | lookin good | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sorry, wrong species. | Mon Aug 22 1994 12:10 | 12 |
| Lasted night Dallas looked like it was telling the rest of the league
that they're looking for the three pete (with no royalties to no one).
Basically, the bludgeoned Denver into submission with their opening
possessions: 2 drives, 14 points and kept the ball for about a full
quarter.
Denver showed off its new highlight, Anthony Miller, who scored on a
blown assignment. Other than that it was a total bust for the Broncos.
The defense looked helpless againt Aikman, Smith, Novacek, Irvin, etc.
TTom
|
9.2254 | | CAMONE::WAY | Tell my friend boy, Willie Brown | Mon Aug 22 1994 14:19 | 8 |
| >The defense looked helpless againt Aikman, Smith, Novacek, Irvin, etc.
That must be Collie-Lover Dan Reeves' legacy. The Giant defense looked like
a sieve on Saturday night.
'Saw
|
9.2256 | good and bad | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sorry, wrong species. | Mon Aug 22 1994 14:25 | 12 |
| So far, Denver and Atlanta look like they have exceptionally bad
defenses when you consider what they're giving up in terms of points.
Other teams that seem to be stinkin up the place are Cincinnati,
Washington, and the LA Rams, all of whom are winless so far. San Diego is
giving up 25+ points per game.
I think we got a trend here in the NFL: a couple of good teams - Dallas,
San Francisco (any body else?) - and the rest of the league trying to get
into a good draft pick position.
TTom
|
9.2257 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | QUIET--case study in progress | Mon Aug 22 1994 14:34 | 9 |
|
<< Note 9.2255 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> ...That whole Harding-Kerrigan fiasco was Dan's doing. It's not the
NO Tommy, that was Ray Handley's fault.
brews
|
9.2258 | why they suck | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sorry, wrong species. | Mon Aug 22 1994 14:41 | 13 |
| Top 10 reasons for why Denver's D sucks:
10. Dan Reeves
9. Big Bad John Elway
8. Mr T
7. Rush Limbaugh
6. Bill Clinton
5. Dikembe Mutombo
4. Automated baggage handling system
3. Charley Waters
2. Aerosmith
1. Joey Buttafuco
|
9.2259 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Mon Aug 22 1994 15:53 | 1 |
| Another reason, cain't play below 5000 ft
|
9.2260 | | CAMONE::WAY | Tell my friend boy, Willie Brown | Mon Aug 22 1994 16:15 | 13 |
| > Of course it's Reeves' fault. The rampant inflation in Brazil is
> Reeves' fault, too. That whole Harding-Kerrigan fiasco was Dan's
> doing. It's not the defensive coordinator's fault or the defensive
> players themselves that are to blame for a poor effort, it's big Dan.
> Especially in Denver when he hasn't coached them in three years.
> It must be nice to have an all-occasion whipping boy.
Sorry Tommy.
I didn't want to have to tell you this, but I just usually blame you
for those things you mentioned.....
|
9.2261 | Question ? | WMOIS::BALL_K | | Thu Aug 25 1994 09:38 | 12 |
| Is there a Football or Patriot notes file some where ?
>> .Case in point, our beloved UMass, a national power for the
>> last half dozen or so years that hasn't produced one NBA player
Not to nit-pick but UMASS has only been a "national power" for 3 years
(4 if you really wanna stretch and include the year we made to
the NIT). We'll probably start producing them next year when Loe Roe
graduates
|
9.2263 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Thu Aug 25 1994 16:18 | 5 |
| there also is a football conference at STKCSC::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL
JaKe
|
9.2264 | thanks for the info | WMOIS::BALL_K | | Fri Aug 26 1994 09:06 | 10 |
|
> I like Lou but he's going to catch hell trying to make it
> in the NBA. He does a lot of things well but no one part-
> icular thing exceptionally much like Harper Williams. I
You may be right, but I think that Roe is built better to make the
transition. He seems to have a small forward's body (even if he hasn't
spent any time there), whereas Harper was built like a short center/PF.
|
9.2265 | No baseball = so what! | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Chapter 11? | Mon Aug 29 1994 16:18 | 4 |
| Finally, another real man's sport starts this coming labor day
weekend!!!
Tim
|
9.2266 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | Football > Baseball | Mon Aug 29 1994 16:25 | 4 |
| Super Bowl will be either the Cowboys or 49ers from the NFC and
either the Bills or Steelers from the AFC.
/Don
|
9.2267 | | MKFSA::LONG | It ain't over til it's over, maybe | Mon Aug 29 1994 16:50 | 4 |
| Thanks for the pre-emptive KOD, Flusher!
billl
|
9.2268 | Entire Schedule ? | LUNER::GROVES | | Tue Aug 30 1994 09:42 | 4 |
|
Is there an entire NFL schedule in this Notes File ?
Jim
|
9.2269 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Tue Aug 30 1994 16:45 | 5 |
| You cain find a complete schedule in SWECSC::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL in note
# 464.*, each week is a reply in that note.
JaKE
|
9.2270 | | MKFSA::LONG | It ain't over til it's over, maybe | Wed Aug 31 1994 13:37 | 4 |
| So I guess we just send our KOH picks to Chappy?
billl
|
9.2271 | YANKEES 1994 COULD HAVE BEENS | WMOIS::FASSETT_E | Nothing beats a Bud MAN!!! | Wed Aug 31 1994 16:38 | 5 |
| I second that motion, Chappy deserves to run the KOH, to keep his mind
off of the fact that his Yankees are not going to the playoffs, and
they won't be playing any World Series games,(not that I think they
would have made it to the series anyway).
FAST EDDIE
|
9.2272 | | METSNY::francus | Baseball in 94? 95? :-( | Wed Aug 31 1994 16:44 | 7 |
| au contraire. we wouldn't want to do anything which would keep Chappy's
mind off the fact that his Yankees are not going to the playoffs. Heck
that is the only silver (well maybe bronze) lining that the baseball
strike has.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2273 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Aug 31 1994 17:16 | 5 |
| re: last couple
You guys better keep praying. No way this season (and all that TV money)
are going down the toilet. You'll have to sweat-out the Yankees' post-season
appearance, for sure...
|
9.2274 | INFO PLEASE | LUDWIG::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peat | Thu Sep 01 1994 15:34 | 6 |
| Does anyone have any info on an injury to Brian Blades of the Seahawks
someone told me he is injured but I haven't seen or heard about it.
Will he be playing sunday ??
Thanks,
Tom
|
9.2275 | AMERICAN_FOOTBALL Notes File | AYOV10::CAIRNS | Radio Ass Kiss !! - On the Air !! | Tue Sep 06 1994 11:08 | 2 |
| Anybody know what;s happend to AMERICAN_FOOTBALL
|
9.2276 | up and running | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | I will make it work | Tue Sep 06 1994 11:47 | 2 |
|
Still on-line I just finished reading it.
|
9.2277 | football conference? | CSC32::J_HENSON | and it's still too short! | Tue Sep 06 1994 13:32 | 7 |
| I can't get into american_football either. When I try to open it,
the get an error telling me something like inappropriate device for
operation. I use the file name STKCSC::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL.
Anyone else?
Jerry
|
9.2278 | | CAM3::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 06 1994 13:34 | 12 |
| >Anyone else?
>
>Jerry
I just added the conference and tried opening it and got the same error.
That error would indicate a propblem on that system I think.....
'Saw
|
9.2279 | the node has changed | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peat | Tue Sep 06 1994 13:55 | 3 |
| The Football note is now on SWECSC::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL
Tom
|
9.2280 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Tue Sep 06 1994 14:03 | 3 |
| Gee, I just added a reply there and didn't get an error and I haven't
changed to the new node as of yet. I'll wait till I get the error and
then change.
|
9.2281 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Sep 06 1994 14:14 | 4 |
| Looks like Dallas and San Francisco are the class of the league.
Bet the NFC and over in the Super Bowl.
/Don
|
9.2282 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Bow down before the one you serve... | Tue Sep 06 1994 15:44 | 5 |
| Whumph....
That's the sound of someone we know officially falling off the Erler
bandwagon so he can jump precariously onto the Viking one...
|
9.2283 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 06 1994 15:51 | 9 |
| I just heard an updated report on Napolean McCallum (he went to Annapolis
right?)
He did severely dislocate his knee and he also damaged an artery. They
are waiting for the swelling (pretty bad) to go down so that they can
do an MRI....
'Saw
|
9.2284 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Sep 06 1994 15:58 | 9 |
| >> Whumph....
>> That's the sound of someone we know officially falling off the Erler
>> bandwagon so he can jump precariously onto the Viking one...
I sure hope Dr 00:00 didn't McCallumize himself on that leap.
billl
|
9.2285 | Turn Back The Clock Games | PENUTS::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN: 297-9527 | Tue Sep 13 1994 20:44 | 5 |
| Not sure if anyone's mentioned this, but I guess this coming weekend
teams will be wearing uniforms from their past years. The Cardinals
will be using uniforms from when they were in Chicago etc.
John
|
9.2286 | TNT Football Special | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | | Wed Sep 14 1994 00:12 | 11 |
| Just got through watching the TNT special on the 75 years of pro
football. Catch it if you can. It was done by NFL Films, and has some
great footage - Immaculate reception, Stablers 20 yard "fumble", the
catch (SF vs 'Boys). Interviews with old players (Sammy Baugh - "Been
throwin forever. How can you play an a go**amn team with somone who
never threw a ball. WHat the hell are they goin to teach me about
throwin!"), Jim Brown running.
Not bad Tee Vee, all in all.
UMDan
|
9.2287 | Fold up helmets | CSLALL::BRULE | Who needs baseball? It's football time | Wed Sep 14 1994 08:55 | 3 |
| RE.2285
Will they be wearing the leather helmets too. That would be great!!!
:^)
|
9.2288 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Wed Sep 14 1994 09:44 | 13 |
| Caught the show last night.
There is some EXCELLENT footage of early football, and lots of footage
through the years. There are some things that come out that you might
not have heard before and stuff like that. I enjoyed it.
Probably the most touching moment, for me, was when they had the guy from
the Canton Bulldogs at the Tampa Bay game, and all the players from the
Bucs were filing by him, introducing themselves... Kind of like a
50 years later type thing.....
'Saw
|
9.2289 | Will it ever end??? | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Sep 14 1994 11:51 | 6 |
|
Geez, now the NFL refs are talking about strinking. They want more $$$.
Kevin
|
9.2290 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Wed Sep 14 1994 11:53 | 10 |
| re.22889
What is "strinking"???
IS that a strike that they spend all their time drinking??
What's they're major gripe, those funny looking uniforms????
JaKe
|
9.2291 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Sep 14 1994 12:00 | 7 |
|
Sure, JaKE, like you've never had a typo, you jerk!
:-)
Kevin
|
9.2292 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Wed Sep 14 1994 12:05 | 8 |
|
>> Sure, JaKE, like you've never had a typo, you jerk!
That's "Mr. jerk", to you.
JaKe
(8^)*
|
9.2293 | | PENUTS::JST_ONGE | John St.Onge USDSL DTN: 297-9527 | Wed Sep 14 1994 12:17 | 6 |
| Re: .2288
Was that the guy who played four different games, all sixty minutes of
each game, in four straight days under different names ?
John
|
9.2294 | George Gipp, one of which was for Notre Dame? | 25022::BREEN | It IS necessarily so | Wed Sep 14 1994 12:25 | 1 |
|
|
9.2295 | 1 year, $1.3M | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed Sep 14 1994 14:21 | 1 |
| Neon Deon signs with the '49ers.
|
9.2296 | neon no show | HBAHBA::HAAS | Sorry, wrong species. | Thu Sep 15 1994 10:06 | 10 |
| I heard Neon was a no-show at the press conference called to announce his
signing.
Supposedly, the 49ers did the ol' restructure others' contracts games,
including Ken Norton who, I'm sure wouldn't mind another ring.
Also, in keeping with the nostalgic spirit of thised weekend, the Cards
are going to start Jim McMahon, a relic in his own right.
TTom
|
9.2297 | At least I'll have one right... | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Thu Sep 15 1994 11:36 | 4 |
| |Also, in keeping with the nostalgic spirit of thised weekend, the Cards
|are going to start Jim McMahon, a relic in his own right.
Sho' glad I took Cleveland in the KOH contest.
|
9.2298 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | No more notes;-( | Thu Sep 15 1994 12:44 | 8 |
| Deion wants to play for 9'rs because he's tired of Rice beating
him...
I thought he wanted like $2.5mil for this year? I guess he wants a
championchip in the NFL since he hasn't gotten one in the MLB.
Tim
|
9.2299 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Thu Sep 15 1994 14:06 | 6 |
|
Plain and simple he might have wanted 2.5 million. None of the
contenders he wants to play for has 2.5 under the cap. So if Deion
wants to play, he'll have to settle for the 1.3.
|
9.2300 | snarf | FRETZ::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu Sep 15 1994 14:25 | 1 |
|
|
9.2301 | unless he satisified with NFC West Champs Ring | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Thu Sep 15 1994 17:58 | 2 |
|
he signed with the wrong team if expects a ring........
|
9.2302 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Baseball in 94? 95? :-( | Fri Sep 16 1994 00:30 | 4 |
| He signed for 1.1 million
The Crazy Met
|
9.2303 | | WMOIS::COOK_T | What ever happened to... | Fri Sep 16 1994 10:29 | 6 |
| Re. last few...
He also has ~750k in incentives in the contract.
TC
|
9.2304 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Fri Sep 16 1994 10:34 | 6 |
|
Sanders can't stop Emitt so I don't see where he's the difference. Stopping
Irvin or Harper isn't the way to beat the boys. Madden didn't call him
the best player in the game for nothin'......
mike
|
9.2305 | go niners | COMET::MARLAND | | Fri Sep 16 1994 11:01 | 2 |
| Just because the 9ers lost 1 game doesn't mean they won't go to the
big game. It's no shame to lose in KC, lots of teams do.
|
9.2306 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Everybody knows this is Nowhere | Fri Sep 16 1994 11:07 | 9 |
|
> Just because the 9ers lost 1 game doesn't mean they won't go to the
> big game. It's no shame to lose in KC, lots of teams do.
true enough but if they have to face Dallas they won't go imo. I'd love
to see them go if it came down to them or Dallas but they don't have
the right temperment to beat the stinkyass cowboys.........
mike
|
9.2307 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Sep 16 1994 14:30 | 7 |
| Dion signed a 1 year contract with the Niners. His thinking seems to be
that after a year (and possibly a ring), there will be a team that will
make room under the cap to meet his price.
The Niners are playing rent-a-db for the year.
=Bob=
|
9.2308 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Fri Sep 16 1994 16:45 | 3 |
| It would be a riot if Deion went to the Cowboys next year.
/Don
|
9.2309 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 19 1994 10:05 | 10 |
| Loved the old uniforms yesterday.
I especially liked the Giants 1956 version. I like it better than today.
What year was the 'Skins jersey from?
And how bout the Pats in their old (better) unis!
'Saw
|
9.2310 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Mon Sep 19 1994 10:08 | 6 |
|
Them Packer and Steeler Uni's were very ugly!!!
Chap
|
9.2311 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Goofy's going to college | Mon Sep 19 1994 10:52 | 4 |
| I thought the Redskins were the best ones by far. The Steelers were
the worst, with the Bears not far behind. Worst helmets - Bills and
Jets who refused to go back to the white ones.... then the Broncos.
|
9.2312 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Follically Challenged!! | Mon Sep 19 1994 11:46 | 5 |
| Actually, I thought the STEELER uniforms were horrible, but the Packers
were the worst.
JaKe
|
9.2313 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Mon Sep 19 1994 11:51 | 11 |
| re: old unis
Missed "Sports Center" so I didn't see too many. Were
the Broncos really wearing those ugly brown things with
the socks with verticle stripes?
Pack, Steelers and Bears were all pretty ugly. I was
bummed that the Dolphins didn't go back to the orange
and white they wore their first year.
=Bob=
|
9.2314 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Goofy's going to college | Mon Sep 19 1994 12:11 | 5 |
| As Berman said, the Dolphins are now 18-0 in those '72 uniforms...
The Broncos had the same basic color scheme, but the helmet was this
blob resembling a bucking bronco.
|
9.2315 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | No QUANTUM leap for Albuquerque! | Mon Sep 19 1994 12:52 | 5 |
| From what I heard the Broncos didn't wear their inaugural uniforms with
the vertical strips because they were to hard to make so they used a
more recent rendition uniform.
|
9.2316 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Sep 19 1994 13:28 | 1 |
| Those USC Trojans played a great game against the Giants yesterday.
|
9.2317 | Keep the hats | VAOP28::Rice | tata | Mon Sep 19 1994 15:18 | 5 |
| > Loved the old uniforms yesterday.
How about the refs hats? Cute. I think they should stay.
josh
|
9.2318 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Mon Sep 19 1994 15:34 | 7 |
| re ref's hats:
Kinda looked like they arrived at the game in MGBs. Very sporty!
billl
p.s. Nice bowties, too!
|
9.2319 | Anybody see a Titelist-2? Is that stadium security??? | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Mon Sep 19 1994 15:57 | 12 |
|
>Kinda looked like they arrived at the game in MGBs. Very sporty!
At first I thought they were a four-some, and one of them hooked
his tee-shot over the stadium wall!
JimH
|
9.2320 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Mon Sep 19 1994 16:17 | 2 |
| I'm surprised they didn't make the refs in the AFC games wear the old
red/white stripes......8^)
|
9.2321 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | No more notes;-( | Mon Sep 19 1994 19:59 | 10 |
| Did they use an old ball?
Didn't the old balls (footballs) used to be brown & white?
To bad they didn't go back to the old rules too.
Offcourse that would mean they would be playing football. Of course
they woulda had to teardown the sissy domes...
Tim
|
9.2322 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 20 1994 10:06 | 12 |
| Detroit beats Dallas last night in OT.
The uniforms were unbelievable -- the old Detroit ones, with the high
sox were kind of cool. The Dallas ones were different, that's for sure.
Did Dallas use their modern helmets?
Walt, what year were the Detroit unis from?
'Saw
|
9.2323 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | Follically Challenged!! | Tue Sep 20 1994 10:13 | 15 |
| >> <<< Note 9.2322 by CAMONE::WAY "Pony Boy take me home..." >>>
>>Detroit beats Dallas last night in OT.
LOVED IT!!! JAson Hanson made it nail biting time for every Detroit
fan lasted night every time he stepped on the field.
>>The uniforms were unbelievable -- the old Detroit ones, with the high
>>sox were kind of cool. The Dallas ones were different, that's for sure.
I thought both teams unis was just butt ugly. Not as ugly as the ones
the STEELERS and the Packers wore Sunday, but ugly nevertheless.
JaKe
|
9.2324 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 20 1994 10:44 | 19 |
| >
> I thought both teams unis was just butt ugly. Not as ugly as the ones
> the STEELERS and the Packers wore Sunday, but ugly nevertheless.
>
The interesting thing, to me, was that back then they didn't have the
choice of material, or the ability to use some of the colors that they
have today.
That "metallic blue" that the Lions normally wear either a) wasn't popular
back in the 50s or just wasn't possible.
When we look back at the old colors, they don't seem good, but back then
it was probably all they had....
'Saw
|
9.2325 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Sep 20 1994 11:52 | 13 |
| The Cowboys went half-assed on the old unis. The fisted Cowboy uniforms were
great, they had the stars on the shoulders of the blue and white jersey, like
they were wearing lasted night, but the helmets were white, with several blue
stars on each side.
re: ugly unis
Yes, many of the old unis look ugly to us, but remember that at the time
they were probably thought to look fine. Remember when everyone thought that
the beltless, softball style unis that MLB teams were wearing looked good?
In retrospect, they look horrible, and now the style is much different.
=Bob=
|
9.2326 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Goofy's going to college | Tue Sep 20 1994 11:55 | 2 |
| GO Lions!!!
|
9.2327 | Who knows his taste? | HANNAH::ASHE | Goofy's going to college | Tue Sep 20 1994 11:59 | 59 |
| From: "George Brooks" 19-SEP-1994 20:05:14.32
To: ashe <hannah::ashe>
CC:
Subj: Pass it on ...
Which "Turn Back The Clock" uniform looked best ?
Awards:
Best Uniforms:
1. Chicago Bears (1930-something)
Steelers (1934) - Keith Olberman was a trip ...
2. Washington - Simple is cool.
3. Giants - Bring back the "ny" !!!!!
4. Rams - All we needed was Crazy Legs Hirsch.
5. San Diego
Raiders - Those silver numbers ...
Honorable mention - Niners (should have worn the helmets), Oilers, and Broncos
Best two teams in a game with throwbacks:
1. Denver-Oakland : Hands down. All that was missing was Blanda, Warren Wells,
Lamonica, et al ...
2. Green Bay-Philly
3. Giants-Washington
Worst Compromise:
1. Buffalo - No blue pants, no white helmets ... what in the *@#^ was that
helmet!!?
2. Jests - Green helmets with old logo? Cheap!
Worst throwbacks:
(Miami,Tampa and Seattle are exempt)
1. Kansas City - Who in the hell are they fooling?
2. Packers - If my nose was for viewing - I'd hold it.
3. Browns - See K.C. - they should have worn those unis from pre '53 (white
helmets)
(Note: Miami should have just said - "Hey, we haven't changed, so don't get
excited." Instead they said they wore their 1972 uniforms. Ooooohhhh ...)
Most disappointing:
1. Vikings - Should have worn the purple pants.
2. Pats - Elvis stinks, but Pat Patriot - was he a bit overrated?
3. KC - Dallas Texans ring a bell?
4. Denver - I wanted the vertical-striped socks. damn ...
Teams that ought to take a hint and go back to the old style:
1. San Diego
2. Giants
3. Bears
4. Rams
5. Washington
|
9.2328 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Tue Sep 20 1994 13:21 | 7 |
| The Dolphins should've put that tank with Flipper in it behind the
goal post like they did in the 60's. After every PAT or field goal Flipper
would bat the football around in the tank. I remember one Patriot/Dolphin game
that was 40 something to 30 something where the A.S.P.C.A could've brought
charges against Miami for working that dolphin to exhaustion.
/Don
|
9.2329 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 20 1994 13:24 | 18 |
| >goal post like they did in the 60's. After every PAT or field goal Flipper
>would bat the football around in the tank. I remember one Patriot/Dolphin game
>that was 40 something to 30 something where the A.S.P.C.A could've brought
>charges against Miami for working that dolphin to exhaustion.
Kind of like the Notre Dame leprechaun who does a push-up for every point
after every score....
So in a 40 point game, that leprechaun does a load of pushups....
I wish the Giants would go back to the old helmet. I always loved that
one, and it looked so cool on Sunday.....
'Saw
|
9.2330 | Way Kool | VAOP28::Rice | tata | Tue Sep 20 1994 13:32 | 6 |
| Lions unis were from 1936.
What a performance by Sanders! Yow! Dallas sips thisted year, no
way they get near the SB (thank you, lord).
josh
|
9.2331 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Tue Sep 20 1994 14:08 | 4 |
| The Penn State Nittany Lion mascott does one-armed pushups for every
point, after every score.
Mark.
|
9.2332 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 20 1994 14:16 | 12 |
| >
> The Penn State Nittany Lion mascott does one-armed pushups for every
> point, after every score.
>
Now THAT'S cool.
I yield to your story of the more manly mascot!
'Saw
|
9.2333 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Sep 20 1994 14:19 | 6 |
|
|I wish the Giants would go back to the old helmet. I always loved that|
|one, and it looked so cool on Sunday.....
Yabbut they dropped the "ny" when they moved to Jersey. It would drive their fans
wild if they switched back.
|
9.2334 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 20 1994 14:21 | 5 |
| >Yabbut they dropped the "ny" when they moved to Jersey. It would drive their fans
>wild if they switched back.
Some of their fans.....8^)
|
9.2335 | I certainly hope that the tradition was not broken... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 20 1994 14:42 | 20 |
|
>> The Penn State Nittany Lion mascott does one-armed pushups for every
>> point, after every score.
>
> Now THAT'S cool.
MikeL, Dave McNeil and I personally witnessed Notre Dame and their
leprechaun give the lion one hell of a workout a few years back... ;-)
But not like the last three games:
Minnesota 56 -> 7 + 14 + 21 + 28 + 35 + 42 + 49 + 56 = 252
USC 35 -> 7 + 14 + 21 + 28 + 35 = 105
Iowa 61 -> 7 + 14 + 21 + 28 + 35 + 42 + 45 + 52 + 55 + 61 = 360
^
| 147 in first 15 minutes!
glenn
|
9.2336 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pony Boy take me home... | Tue Sep 20 1994 15:01 | 9 |
| Can he/she (the Lion mascot) switch arms? Can he/she switch arms
DURING a stint of one-armed pushups? Or is he/she allowed to use
a different arm after every score, but stick with that arm throuhout the
"set"?
These are important aspects of this feat which must be ascertained!
'Saw
|
9.2338 | some like it | HBAHBA::HAAS | australopithecus westvirginius | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:19 | 12 |
| > Show of hands - how many people aren't at all impressed with
> Marion Butts? I don't see where our short yardage rushing game
> has improved appreciably.
The major beneficiary of this has been Natrone Means who has become the
Main Main for the Chargers. And of course, the Fantasy Football players
like Butts 'cause he scores.
Meanwhile Leonard Russell seems to be doing OK for Denver, if'n you can
say anything is going OK for the Donks.
TTom
|
9.2339 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:19 | 5 |
| Barry Sanders is gawd!
What a move he put on the Pats secondary on his second touchdown.
Mark.
|
9.2340 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Sep 26 1994 13:53 | 4 |
| Yeah, I liked watching the waterboy pick up all the jocks that
Barry faked the Pats out of.
Scott 8-)>
|
9.2341 | Most teams could live with "failure" like this... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 26 1994 14:48 | 12 |
|
> Marshall Faulk has rushed for 61 yards in each of his last
> two games. Good thing we had that statue in Canton on hold.
So playing for a lousy team that's been in catch-up mode the last two
weeks, Faulk has 122 yards (which comes pretty close to a 1000-yard
season projected from his *worst* games, and drops him to what, second
in the league in rushing?). Are you sincerely the last football fan
in America to fail to recognize this guy's talent?
glenn
|
9.2342 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Mon Sep 26 1994 14:54 | 6 |
| I kind of enjoyed watching Chicago beat the Jets last night.
It was UGLY football, but it was fun-to-watch ugly football.....
'Saw
|
9.2343 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 27 1994 10:03 | 16 |
|
>> So playing for a lousy team that's been in catch-up mode the last two
>> weeks, Faulk has 122 yards (which comes pretty close to a 1000-yard
>> season projected from his *worst* games, and drops him to what, second
>> in the league in rushing?). Are you sincerely the last football fan
>> in America to fail to recognize this guy's talent?
I assume yoyu mean, am I the last football fan to hail Marshall Faulk
as the second coming of Barry Sanders? I guess I am. I'd just like to
reserve judgement until after the kid does more than have a great college
career and one great pro game. Especially, given that his numbers are
steadily deceasing unlike Jerome Bettis who last year also toiled for
a truly stanky team but managed to finish second in rushing and shows
no sign of letting up.
|
9.2344 | Yes, he had to come down from the 2000-yard pace... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:23 | 13 |
|
> Especially, given that his numbers are
> steadily deceasing
Yes, down to that atrocious _conference-leading_ 4.7 yards/carry (even
against the Steelers' fine defense he was over 4.0; he was at 5.5
through the first three games). I'm not comparing him to Sanders
and yes we'll have to wait and see _exactly_ how good he is but this
"steady decrease" amounts to one game which wasn't even that bad.
The original disparaging comment was ridiculously misleading...
glenn
|
9.2345 | Got to love all the great RB's out there today | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:39 | 12 |
| Garrison Hurst is a disapearing act, if Faulk stays healthy he will
join the elite group of 3, he may even replace one. Thomas is not
getting any younger and may take one too many beatings this season.
Emmitt/Barry/Marshall... Id bet on it (Hope Thurman continues to stay
a part of this group)..
This is not taking anything away from the next tier of good backs
Hampton/Foster/Means/Watters/Bettis I just think the above 4 are 1
notch up...
mab
|
9.2346 | A little premature, maybe? | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Sep 27 1994 11:51 | 11 |
| I find it interesting that Faulk is grouped in with the other three.
If memory serves me, which it usually doesn't, he only had one big game
out of 4 so far this year. Even the seemingly suspect run defense of
the Steelers held him in check for the most part.
Granted he is a just a rookie, and I fully expect him to improve to be
a leading ground gainer, but I don't think he deserves to be grouped in
with the likes of Sanders and Smith. (At least not yet.)
billl
|
9.2347 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Sep 27 1994 12:53 | 5 |
| I wouldn't totally give up on Hearst yet. He hasn't really had a
chance to prove himself and will not have a line to run behind when he
comes back.
Mike
|
9.2348 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Sep 27 1994 13:22 | 17 |
|
>> Yes, down to that atrocious _conference-leading_ 4.7 yards/carry (even
>> against the Steelers' fine defense he was over 4.0; he was at 5.5
>> through the first three games). I'm not comparing him to Sanders
>> and yes we'll have to wait and see _exactly_ how good he is but this
>> "steady decrease" amounts to one game which wasn't even that bad.
>> The original disparaging comment was ridiculously misleading...
That "fine" Steelers' defense gave up over 4 yards per carry to
the "fine" Seattle running game. I wonder where exactly that "fine"
Steelers run defense ranks. And the one game that "wasn't that bad"
was 61 yards on 22 carries for a 3.14 yards per carry average.
For Kevin Turner that wouldn't be bad but for a guy who you were
touting as a the next Emmitt, it ain't at all impressive. Subtract
Faulk's performance against the pathetic Oilers and his whole season
isn't very impressive thus far.
|
9.2349 | | PTOS01::SCHRAMME | | Tue Sep 27 1994 13:45 | 4 |
|
re -1
I dont know - I think Warren gives Seattle a nice running attack.
|
9.2350 | Of course maybe Emmitt should stand alone, 2+ Rings | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:08 | 15 |
| My note says if Faulk stays healthy, but ok, if he stays healthy and
the team continues to improve. Weve seen what GREAT RB on Horrible
teams can do (not Much). Even Detroit had some good/great OL some of
there years Barry's been there... Indy is a very low team, barry/emmitt
and thurman all play for middle to top level teams...
Seattle RB Warren is an excellant RB, big strong fast, but I dont think
he'll win many Rushing Title's..... Faulk on the other hand (Bettis)
will be right in there with the big 3....(I wish they included return
yards in total yards from scrimmage, someone said they dont, can
someone verify that). Metcalf would proberbly rank right up there in
total yards from scrimmage if Where a return man cought the ball was
considered the line of scrimmage (Should be total yards gained)
mab
|
9.2351 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:24 | 5 |
| I'm pretty sure that rushing titles are just total yards rushing from
scrimmage, return yards and receiving yards are not counted.
billl
|
9.2352 | oh no | COMET::MARLAND | | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:29 | 2 |
| speaking of Bettis, there's 8 teams out there who wish theyed have
taken him (he was picked 9th).
|
9.2353 | Thats a tough way to make a living... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Sep 27 1994 16:29 | 12 |
| Rushing title's are just total yards from scrimmage (Rushing). I
think more credit should be givin to the total yards gained type
back. Total yards should be Rushing+receiving+Return yrds, they
do a total yard from scrimmage catagory that doesnt includ return
yards... A back like Metcalf (run/catch/return) may be more valuable
then a back that can only run...
Man Metcalf was be one durable man.... He must take alot of hits a
game... I dont have his exact stats but he must take 10+ good hits
a game (Special teams always seem to hit HARD on every tackle).
mab
|
9.2354 | Wonder if Seattle is bummin though | AD::HEATH | It'll be Oct soon and Butch will be gone | Wed Sep 28 1994 08:26 | 6 |
|
No maybe 7 As a Patriot fan most would agree that Bledsoe was the best
choice.
Jerry
|
9.2355 | DDrrreeeewwwwwww | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Sep 29 1994 17:15 | 22 |
| has anyone been able to get into the RTFM1::AMERICAN_FOOTBALL notesfile
today ? I keep getting kicked out with Exceeded Enqueue Quota ? Whos
in charge over thre :-)
Bledsoe VS Mirer. Intresting you cant argue with success and seattle
does have a 3-1 record to the pats 2-2. But I dont think too many
would aruge that seattle has the better Defense, WR's and RB's. I
think Bledsoe is a better QB. They both completed 61.9% of there
passes so far this season. But Bledsoe has almost twice as many Yards
and TD's as mirer, but Mirer has only thrown 2 INT (To Bledsoe's 6).
Bledsoe has a 90.1 rating to Mirer's 88.9 Pretty close, but bledsoe
seems to be the better of the 2 at the QB spot.
Had Seattle landed Bledsoe they would be a very scary team, Warren is
becoming one of the top RB's, there WR (Blades/Martin) are both very
good, and there defense is one of the top defense's in the league. I
bet Parcells would like to trade some of NEW Englands players with
seattle :-)
But not Bledsoe he is the best QB to come into the league since Aikman
MaB
|
9.2357 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Sep 29 1994 17:28 | 6 |
| > Has Mirer called a timeout at the very beginning of the 4th quarter?
Lots of QB's have at some point or another; how is this relevant?
The Crazy Met
|
9.2358 | Obvious Choice | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Sep 29 1994 17:40 | 11 |
| With all that seattle has to offer Mirer he should be cleaning
house up there. The Defense is a FEW notches higher then the
pats defense. And I feel blades/Martin are better WR's then the
pats have. Plus there opponents defense's have to respect Chris
Warren more then Butts/Thompson (At this point in the season).
So The pats are always in a Throw situation and bledsoe is handling
it just fine.... Bledsoe is #1 over Mirer, Bledsoe is ranked 6th in
the league (Mirer 10th).
mab
|
9.2361 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Sep 29 1994 17:50 | 6 |
| fair enough; but having something like that happens hardly indicates
which QB is better. fwiw I follow neither team so this is an academic
discussion from my point of view.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2362 | Brown>Bledsoe/Mirer | WLW::TURCOTTE | Well...I got my man | Thu Sep 29 1994 18:19 | 4 |
| I think its obvious that Dave Brown is Better than both of them, and
he was drafted higher...;-)
Turk
|
9.2363 | tough d | BSS::MARLAND | | Thu Sep 29 1994 19:05 | 1 |
| Seattle's defense is a LOT better than New England's.
|
9.2364 | not sayin' much..... | AIMHI::CORRIGAN | | Thu Sep 29 1994 19:15 | 5 |
|
[insert here]'s defense in a LOT better than New England's
|
9.2365 | You've got to be kidding, right? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 29 1994 19:22 | 25 |
|
Bledsoe's head is probably at about the same place most 21-year-old's
are at that age. The point has been made many times over that Bledsoe
is still a year younger than many senior college QBs, having graduated
high school somewhere outside of the state of Texas, not redshirting,
and then leaving college a year early. He's something like a year-plus
older than Ron Powlus, for crying out loud. In light of the remarkable
accomplishment so far for someone of his limited experience (especially
since the Pats' passing offense with their 3.0 yards/carry on the
ground has been no surprise to anyone), I don't understand the
criticism of the occasional timeout when faced with a confusing
defense, whether it comes at the beginning of a quarter or at the end
(that's something that comes with experience and longterm preparation,
not during a commercial break). Steve Grogan at 35 could have used
such judgment. Bledsoe's only gotten off to about as good a start as
anyone not named Dan Marino ever has.
I think Tommy's just befuddled that that ridiculous scouting report
that he endorsed from the "unnamed AFC East GM" (no doubt Jests'
jeenyus Dick Steinberg) passed through Will McDonough that painted
Bledsoe as "the next Marc Wilson, product of the system" proved to be
so wrong. Let's face it, the kid is an unqualified smashing success...
glenn
|
9.2366 | Boston Fans!! Always overrating there players!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Sep 30 1994 08:22 | 9 |
|
Lets not forget that Mike Greenwell was heavily regarded when he
first came in the league too? Lets let Drew do something before we give
him his one way ticket to Canton!
chap
|
9.2367 | Back at ya... | 56821::MORGAN | | Fri Sep 30 1994 09:14 | 4 |
| No Chappy, it was Lou Piniella, not Nick Cafardo, who claimed Mike
Greenwell to be one of the top 5 hitters in the game.
Steve
|
9.2368 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Sep 30 1994 09:43 | 8 |
|
No it was some idiots in the Red Sox file that got my attention. I'm
not saying Drew won't be a great player SOMEDAY. But Right now he's
not!
Chap
|
9.2369 | No one mentioned Canton (or Cooperstown), try and keep up Chap | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 30 1994 10:53 | 16 |
|
> No it was some idiots in the Red Sox file that got my attention. I'm
> not saying Drew won't be a great player SOMEDAY. But Right now he's
> not!
I have great appreciation for the fact that a 20-21 year old kid has
thrown for almost 4000 yards over his first 16 NFL starts. No more,
no less. I don't have a problem recognizing talent in its own
time, as opposed to waiting until the player is retired, or dead.
It's completely reasonable to watch the games with a proper
perspective on history and it makes them a heck of a lot more fun.
And I'm certainly not going to go the other way, look at that level
of performance from a player so young and run him down for it...
glenn
|
9.2371 | Johnny U > Roger Staubach > Marino >...... >Drew | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Sep 30 1994 11:38 | 7 |
|
Bob Lobel has already put him on the Patriots 50 yr AllTeam? Not
saying the guy is bad but lets wait before we call him Drew U.
Chappy
|
9.2372 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Fri Sep 30 1994 11:43 | 22 |
| I'll qualify my remarks by saying I'm not a Pats fan so I haven't seen
as much of Bledsoe as I would if I were a Pats fan, but here's my
2� worth.....
Bledsoe is still young, and he's still inexperienced. The arm might be
pro-caliber, the feet might be pro-caliber, but I think the only way
you get a pro-caliber head is by playing the pro-game.
The two intangibles in a QB, IMO, are leadership ability and a cool head
under pressure. Leadership ability and a cool head, in the NFL, come
with experience.
I would expect Bledsoe to make some dumb mistakes (running on 4th and 1)
but the key is whether or not he learns from them. If he does, and if
he can become the field general who can dress down a wayward lineman,
or cuss out a "doggin'-it" wide receiver, then he'll be a fine QB.
I guess it's just a time will tell thang.....
'Saw
|
9.2373 | "Great" supporting cast? By what standard? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 30 1994 11:55 | 29 |
|
> I'm not denying the kid has a
> great arm (and a great supporting cast, too!).
I have to disagree with this part about a "great supporting cast".
I still believe that the one element that the Patriots lack even
considering their relative youth is the overall talent base. In the
off-season we heard about how wonderful the O-line promised to be and
yet the running game is nearly non-existent, and that is a large
disadvantage from which Bledsoe must work, regardless of what he has
for pass-catchers (and we haven't even gotten to the pressure that the
poor defense has created). The wide receivers may be better than
expected but there's certainly no consistent greatness there. Coates
is awesome, no question. So in the formula that says that you win
Super Bowls with 4-5 top-caliber players on each side of the ball, 30
other players of established competence, and strong coaching, what do
the Patriots have in the first category? Bledsoe, Coates, Armstrong,
and Vincent Brown, at the present time, maybe?
From your comments I'm coming to the conclusion that you believe with
an experienced QB in lieu of the young Bledsoe, with this "great"
supporting cast the Pats would be much better off. I just don't see
that at all. I think he's more than holding up his end of the bargain,
and compared to the sorry cast of characters, including veterans, that
shuttled through here after Grogan he's a huge improvement, even with
the mistakes.
glenn
|
9.2374 | Even for Bledsoe, this was minor... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 30 1994 12:18 | 20 |
|
> I would expect Bledsoe to make some dumb mistakes (running on 4th and 1)
By the way, this "mistake" by Bledsoe has been largely exaggerated
all around. In an absolute desperation situation, the Pats barely
failed to pick up the first down on the play before. That was the
critical play. There were under 10 seconds to go before even the
coaching staff knew what was going on. While some very heady play by
Bledsoe might have saved a few seconds and picked up a 1st down, we're
talking about hoping for a miracle produced out of nothing. This
situation was nothing like the one where "cagey veteran" Hugh Millen
decided to run for daylight and glory with no timeouts in that game
against the Broncos two years ago, as I heard this play compared to.
That one was a conscious decision in a well-defined game situation
from a play called in the huddle, where the tying FG was in the bag,
by way of comparison...
glenn
|
9.2375 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Fri Sep 30 1994 12:21 | 10 |
|
In regards to Bledsoe calling timout at the beginning of the 4th
quarter. I think it was because the coaching staff messed up. What
is Bledsoe suppose to do if they call a play called 44 right on 2.
Meaning, hand the ball off to Butts to run right and Butts isn't even
in the game? I think the play at the start of the 4th quarter was going
to be a pass to Coates. Coates wasn't even in the game, so Drew called
the Timeout.
Ron
|
9.2376 | Bledsoe VS Favre... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Sep 30 1994 12:59 | 30 |
| Name 1 QB to come after Aikman thats better then Bledsoe. If I was
starting a new young team (say one of the expansion teams). Bledsoe
would be my first choice at QB (To build around). The top QB's in
the league today are mostly at the end of there careers (Marino, Kelly
Montana, Elway, (Any Pho QB :-)), Cunningham, Moon, Young etc).
Id say the above 7 are arguably 7 of the top 10 in the league today
the other 3 IMHO would be Favre, Bledsoe, George.
And Yes they have one of the Best Young TE's in the league (Maybe the
best) but would any of the WR's in NE take the #1 (or #2) spot on any
teams around the league ? Id say Blades would be a #1/#2 WR on most
of the teams in the league, Im not so sure about any of the NE WR's.
So Mirer has better WR's, Better Defense, Better RB, Bledsoe has Coates
(and a better coach). Mirer should have better #'s, but he's not as
good a QB as Bledsoe. Bledsoe's only problem at this point is youth,
he thinks he can do it all, and once he gets over that (Parcells should
cure that quickly) he will make less mistakes, calling a timeout at any
point of a game that may help lead to a score is better then throwing a
play away (Or an INT).
If I was an expansion team, My #1 pick (If I could chose) would be
Bledsoe at QB. Could he flop, of course, But Id take a young talanted
QB over most of the aging QB's. Parcells is building a winning team
and has the biggest/best piece all set...
GO PATS BEAT GB....
mab
|
9.2377 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Fri Sep 30 1994 13:05 | 8 |
| I've got to agree with someone who said earlier that Dave Brown is damn
good....
I was not high on him at all to start with, but he's proven himself to
be tough, and he does a good job under pressure.... His stock has
risen in my opinion.
'Sawe
|
9.2378 | Coupla Vikes | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | | Fri Sep 30 1994 13:06 | 11 |
| We interrupt this Boston-based chest-thumping/bashing rathole to bring
the other following NFL news:
Warren Moon has been name NFC Offensive Player of the Week
Jack Del Rio has been named NFC Defensive Player of the Month.
Thank you and bash away,
Spud
|
9.2380 | Who Let this Kramer guy get away :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Sep 30 1994 14:40 | 10 |
| Dave brown is averaging 170yrds per game, had 4TD's on the year and
2INT's. 511yrds for the season, didnt bledsoe throw that many in 1
game :-) Brown is 35 for 56 on the SEASON, 35 RECEPTIONS ??? in 3 games
12 per game ? Those arent GREAT #'s... But he's 3-0,... and he's
ranked 5th in the league (Ahead of YOUNG ?).
Of course this ranking qb's is strange, even if the #'s pan out how
can Kramer be listed as the Top Ranked QB in the NFL 107.5 rating...
mab
|
9.2381 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Mon Oct 03 1994 10:13 | 14 |
| > Dave brown is averaging 170yrds per game, had 4TD's on the year and
> 2INT's. 511yrds for the season, didnt bledsoe throw that many in 1
> game :-) Brown is 35 for 56 on the SEASON, 35 RECEPTIONS ??? in 3 games
> 12 per game ? Those arent GREAT #'s... But he's 3-0,... and he's
> ranked 5th in the league (Ahead of YOUNG ?).
Okay, don't forget, the Giants have a running game -- quite a good one.
What I was talking about was mainly poise and leadership ability, which
doesn't always show in the stats.
'Saw
|
9.2382 | Brown hasnt had a GREAT game yet ? | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Oct 03 1994 16:35 | 11 |
| Back to earth for Giants Fans.. .This is one of those HOW CAN IT BE
Well Brown had another Brown type day 20-35-2-152, didnt even reach
his 170yrd average, 663yrds for the season, 2 TD's and 2 INT's. I
will say one thing, no QB can have a decent game getting sacked 7
times, plus I think he had over 10 Hurries, and qutie a few KnockDowns
as well....Big game for NY next Week VS Minny, both teams fighting to
stay on top in there division, Phoenix Travels to Dallas... Should be
intresting :-)
mab
|
9.2383 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 04 1994 10:19 | 50 |
| > -< Brown hasnt had a GREAT game yet ? >-
If you measure GREAT games by statistics, no, he hasn't. But then again,
as I've said before, O Dense One, the Giants have a running game, and use
it quite frequently.
> Back to earth for Giants Fans.. .This is one of those HOW CAN IT BE
If you knew anything at all about the Giants, you'd know HOW CAN IT BE.
The Giants historically SUCK in the game after a bye. Why you might ask?
Well, beating Mike Childs to the punch, I'll tell you about Coach Good Time
Dan, who always gives his guys the week of the bye off.
Every time he's done that (which is every time period) they've lost the
following game.
A tap-dancing Chris Calloway stated on WFAN that he felt the team was
ready physically, but that they might have lost some of it mentally, which
I think it is the case.
>I will say one thing, no QB can have a decent game getting sacked 7
> times, plus I think he had over 10 Hurries, and qutie a few KnockDowns
> as well....
Yeah, the o-line SUCKED yesterday. There were some injuries and I knew
going into the season that there is no depth in the o-line, not at least
like there was in the old days.
What I think Brown brings to the club is poise and leadership ability.
The players respect him, he's man enough to admit his mistakes (especially
on the INT for a TD) and he seems durable.
Given the choice between a QB who puts up great stats (Dan Marino) and
a QB who can lead you to the Super Bowl, I'll take the latter every time....
The Minny game will tell alot. I think the Giants will lose it.
'Saw
|
9.2384 | Randall's my main man on my FFL roster ... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Oct 04 1994 10:38 | 22 |
| Well just who IS the cream of the Crop in the NFL...
The 49ers went out and got everything they needed, well instead of
Dion :-) they should have grabbed some debth at OL. The 49ers with
a fairly easy schedule (I thin the 2nd or 3rd easiest in the NFL) is
now at 3-2. If you made a list of WHO looks like Playoff teams in the
NFL the 49ers have played 2 Playoff teasm in KC and Phillya and lost
both ? I still think SF has the most talant and gained the most in the
offseason but something is not quite right down there in SF land.
Will be very intresting to see who rises to the top, Philly will have
to beat Dallas to be considered a threat in the NFC east, but Randall
does look like the randall of old.... With a Running Game and Barnett
back in the picture there defense may be more then adequte to get the
job done.
Id say Randall and Barnett are close to being fully recoverd, if
barnett can get his timing back LOOKOUT they could be contenders.
Philly could be that underdog team to push past Dallas/SF in the NFC
mab
|
9.2385 | Vikes/Jersey Giants next Monday night | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | | Tue Oct 04 1994 11:49 | 11 |
| Let's hope 'saw is right and the Vikes do take the Gnats. :*) The
Vikes O looked sickly vs. AZ and they blew a chance to really open up
on the division. A win here and they should be on their way to the NFC
Central title, a loss and it'll be a struggle the rest of the way.
Go VIKES!!!
Spud
PS, who is Dave Brown and where did he come from? I'm serious...
|
9.2386 | | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Tue Oct 04 1994 11:55 | 7 |
| Dave Brown is from Duke. The Giants drafted him in the supplemental
draft 3 years ago.
The Giants lost a game they shouldn't have this week. Hopefully, they
can make up for it against the Vikes.
Mike
|
9.2387 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Tue Oct 04 1994 13:22 | 5 |
| Can someone please decode .2384 for me?
Thanks in advance.
Mark.
|
9.2389 | Gee, John, how are you handling your newfound freedom? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 04 1994 13:41 | 9 |
|
Fact is, Dan Reeves is looking like a better all-around football coach
by the minute. He may not be the world's most innovative coach, but
somehow he gets guys ready to play and then they go out and do so.
It's looking more and more like the wrong guy won the ongoing
Reeves/Elway battle...
glenn
|
9.2390 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:14 | 7 |
| | Can someone please decode .2384 for me?
Careful Mark, MairB is very sensitive about this stuff. He's a high
school grad, you know, and was at the top of his college class. He
also has a wildly successfull career here at Digital.
=Bob=
|
9.2391 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:16 | 4 |
| Thanks, equalBobequal. For a minute, I thought REK had access to the
net.
Mark.
|
9.2392 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:26 | 38 |
| >
> Thanks, equalBobequal. For a minute, I thought REK had access to the
> net.
>
Yeah, I thought RCASO was back. But you have to be vewy, vewy qwiet talking
about spelling and gwammer wif dese wascally wabbits on the net.....
re Tommy:
Yeah, ALWAYS in the two years he's been there. What's so
hard to figure about that. I don't know the bye records
under Handley, but nothing was good under him.
Lauding Dave Brown as a good QB is not mutually exclusive of
being pissed at letting Simms go. Dave Brown is a good QB
and he's picked up some things very quickly. I still would
have liked to have seen Simms there this season as Brown's
mentor, but I'm not displeased with what Dave Brown has shown.
re Glenn:
Reeves has a way of getting his teams (or at least this Giants
team -- last year, this year) to overachieve.
He has a similar fault to Snuffy though, and that is when it's
on the line, he cannot or will not "improvise, overcome and adapt"
his game plan to try and beat the opposition. That was
supremely evident his his Super Bowl appearances and last season
against San Fran.....
'Saw
|
9.2393 | I hate those stupid bye weeks... | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:36 | 5 |
| | hard to figure about that. I don't know the bye records
| under Handley, but nothing was good under him.
Isn't lasted year the firsted year with bye weeks?
|
9.2395 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 04 1994 14:45 | 27 |
| > "Always" meaning twice. I suppose you could have just said
> "twice" but that wouldn't have had the same effect. And with
Always as in EVERY time Reeves has faced a bye with the Giants, which
I believe totals three times. I'd have to go back and check, but
I think they had two byes last year also.
As to Reeves, I've watched him in the SB and I watched him all last
season with the Giants. If his game plan (including all his gadget plays)
don't work, he keeps pounding it against the wall hoping that it will.
re =Bob= and byes:
I don't have the records, but they had byes last year, and
for at least one season before that, but there was one year
(two years ago?) where they didn't...or something like that.
I didn't realize it, but back in 1960 the NFL had bye weeks because
they had an odd number of teams.
'Saw
|
9.2396 | | LOCK::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:20 | 8 |
|
Waugamain is correct, the wrong guy won that urination contest
in Denver. However, 'Saw mentioned something about no depth
on the OL. Get used to it! That was my only gripe with Reeves
while he was with Denver....he'd just stock the line with whatever
castoffs he could find.
Claybone
|
9.2397 | the way of the NFL world | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:26 | 6 |
| | while he was with Denver....he'd just stock the line with whatever
| castoffs he could find.
Unfortunatly, there aren't too many teams with first-rate starters
on their o-line these days...
|
9.2398 | fickle fans | CNTROL::CHILDS | She was a TWO-Bagger | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:27 | 8 |
|
but last year when Elway was running up the big numbers you guys were
happy to be rid if Reeves and BLAM(tm) him. Now that Elway has come
back to earth he's the bum and Reeves was gawd? Make up your mind.
imo they both suck. but you already knew that..........
mike
|
9.2400 | | LOCK::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:35 | 8 |
|
MikeyC.,
I defy you to find any note of mine in this conference which
supported Reeves being fired. I was one of the few that
thought it was a stupid move. Too bad owners can't be fired...
Claybone
|
9.2401 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:38 | 20 |
| Agreed Mikey....
The Giants had some solid o-line starters -- but no depth, and there
have been a couple of injuries.
We must be going through an OL drought. Let's face it. Kids don't wanna
play line. If you play o-line, you can't shuck and jive and wiggle your
ass on the camera whilst you wave a finger in someone's face.
How many folks know that the oldest active player in the NFL, with the most
years in, is a lineman.....
You have to have a certain kind of mindset to play o-line -- one where you
are satisfied to be part of the team, and don't mind not having the
limelight on you. Throwing the perfect block in an anonymous situation
isn't for everyone... and hey, these days, kids don't want that....
'Saw
|
9.2402 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:43 | 14 |
| Tommy,
I'm not BLAMing(tm) Reeves for others mistakes, but what I can blame old
Good Time Dan for is his vacation week on the bye week.
The players lose focus, and in his tenure, it's an assured thing that they'll
lose on the bye week.
However, I will give the man this much credit. He's already said "no time
off on the bye week next year"
'Saw
|
9.2403 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:51 | 12 |
| Something else needs to be thrown into the mix before we conclude that Reeves
is losing due to his week off. Who did the Giants lose to those weeks after the
bye?
If they lost to teams with mediocre or bad records, then that might be a
problem but if a couple or three of those loses were close ones to teams that
ended up around 13-3 then I don't know if that proves all that much.
True practice is important but recovering from the beating you take as a
player is important also.
George
|
9.2404 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 04 1994 15:58 | 10 |
|
> True practice is important but recovering from the beating you take as a
> player is important also.
Which is why Bill "Hard Guy, Jints-fans' endorsed" Parcells just let
the Pats off till Wednesday as a reward for winning two straight tough
games. Some of this stuff is pure coincidence...
glenn
|
9.2405 | The SPEED NOTER | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Oct 04 1994 16:54 | 7 |
| Ya, Ya Ya I know Im the only one in here that doenst have time to
PROOF READ ALL MY NOTES... Sorry, 2 people out today, covering for
both...
That one even made me ask, what the he'll was I trying to type...
mab
|
9.2406 | this just in..... | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Wed Oct 05 1994 11:24 | 10 |
| Just heard an interesting development on the news regarding the
Simpson trial. Judge Lance Ito has decided....
to move the trial to Cincinati(sp?) where nobody knows anything
about football.
nyuk, nyuk,
billl
|
9.2407 | Close | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Oct 05 1994 12:23 | 11 |
| re: billl
> to move the trial to Cincinati(sp?) where nobody knows anything
> about football.
billl,
you heard wrong, but you were close. They're moving it to
Cleveland, not Cincinnati. Same reason though!
zamboni
|
9.2408 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Oct 05 1994 13:27 | 3 |
| > Can someone please decode .2384 for me?
I would've but I lost my RCASO decoder ring.
|
9.2409 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 05 1994 14:17 | 8 |
9.2410 | nyuk, nyuk | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Wed Oct 05 1994 15:15 | 7 |
| >>Oh great knowledgeable New England sports fans, I am not worthy to
>>post here...
You finally figured that out! Who says Cleveland folks are slow?!
billl
|
9.2411 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Thu Oct 06 1994 11:19 | 15 |
| > Ya, Ya Ya I know Im the only one in here that doenst have time to
> PROOF READ ALL MY NOTES... Sorry, 2 people out today, covering for
> both...
>
I proof read mine while I do them....8^)
> That one even made me ask, what the he'll was I trying to type...
That's a good thing to know. 8^) 8^) 8^)
'Saw
|
9.2412 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | QUIET--case study in progress | Fri Oct 07 1994 13:50 | 6 |
| > I proof read mine while I do them....8^)
Yah, butt, caw if ewe tiped wif yore tows like MerrorB duz, u'd half a
hared thyme pruf riting az u dew dem.
brews
|
9.2413 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Fri Oct 07 1994 14:55 | 4 |
| Rollward Brews....rollward.....
Seen any more snakes lately btw?
|
9.2414 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | QUIET--case study in progress | Mon Oct 10 1994 12:49 | 20 |
| > Seen any more snakes lately btw?
Well, since you axed, Sept-early Oct. is prime snake season. My dog
got bit in the stomach by one about 3 weeks ago. I noticed a bit of
blood dripping from her, and after an inspection, figured I'd better
take her in to the vet. Sure enough, whe'd been bit, right in our
backyard.
The stomach is an unusual place for a dog to get bit, she must have
walked right over a hole the thing was in. Usually they get bit on the
snout or neck.
SHe's OK now though. I guess I caught her early enough. THe vet told
me of another dog that got it in the stomach and the venom got into the
dog's organs (didn't happen in my case, just a surface bite). THe dog
needed 14 doses of anti-venom. Anti-venom goes for $250 a pop, so you
figure that plus the hospitalization, the dog probably cost them over
$5000.
brews
|
9.2415 | | CAMONE::WAY | Models caskets for D'Esopo's | Mon Oct 10 1994 12:58 | 19 |
| Wow.
Our snake season here is a little different -- obviously the hot summer
months (June, July, August) are prime for rattlers. August is a bit tough
because they shed and are blind and ornery.
I never worried when I was in Hebron, because I'd see black snakes from
time to time on the property and they're natural enemies of the Easter
Timber Rattler -- at least that's what all the old timers (including
my Dad) tell me.
Where I am now in Glastonbury, I still keep an eye open when I leave the
house..... But with the cooler nights now, the snakes have pretty much
headed back into their dens.....
Hope your dog will be okay!
'Saw
|
9.2416 | poor man's anti-venom | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 10 1994 13:20 | 6 |
| up in Northern AZ where you have to drive many miles to get to a vet,
people just give their animals Benadryl capsules as an anti-venom.
Works pretty good too! Some say they've even see their pets make a
comeback even after the head starts swelling from the venom.
Mike
|
9.2417 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | QUIET--case study in progress | Mon Oct 10 1994 13:32 | 11 |
|
Benadryl works more as an antihistamine, to keep the swelling down.
Anti-venom actually fights the poison.
THe dog is fine now. Wouldn't even know that she was bitten. It'll be
interesting to see what she does next time she sees a rattler, though.
She always wanted to play with them before. I never did find the snake
that got her either, which didn't make the wifey too happy.
brews
|
9.2419 | Okay, I get it: if young, thou shalt not make mistakes | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 10 1994 17:59 | 20 |
|
> Marshall Faulk's woes continue as he fumbled twice
> during Indy's loss to the Jets. Two fumbles and coach
> Bill Parcells would bench his butt if he played for the
> Pats.
Somehow I doubt this, unless Parcells is now prepared to bench Kevin
Turner, just as he was prepared to bench Fumblin' Leonard Russell
early last year until he figured out there was no one else who could
carry the ball. To an even greater extent, for good or bad Faulk is
practically Indy's entire offense. Again, to describe Faulk's 550
yards rushing, 4.5 yards/carry output for the season as woeful
because of a couple fumbles in one otherwise typically strong game is
like blaming the Pats' loss to Miami on Ben Coates because he finally
coughed up the ball on his 11th or 12th catch-and-run of the day. In
other words, he's carrying most of the load, and doing it rather
nicely, so the Colts will gladly go back to the well.
glenn
|
9.2420 | Why don't the Pats get guys like this?! | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Oct 11 1994 08:52 | 10 |
| Heard on the radio this morning....
Doug <too small for the NFL> Flutie lead his CFL team to a record 22nd
straight win last night with 3 TD passes.
(Figured I would stir up some old football ratholes and take the heat
off the hunting note.)
billl
|
9.2421 | some food for thought | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Oct 11 1994 09:36 | 34 |
| NFL Power Rating Week 6
2 points for each win and 1 point for each defeated opponents win
Team Opp.
Team Wins Wins Pts. Opponents Defeated
1 Min 4 13 21 Chi Det Mia NYG
2 Phi 4 12 20 Chi GB SF Was
3 SD 5 9 19 Cin Den Rai Sea KC
4 Chi 4 11 19 NYJ TB Buf NO
5 Buf 4 9 17 Den Hou NE Mia
6 Mia 4 9 17 GB NE NYJ Cin
7 KC 3 10 16 Atl NO SF
8 SF 4 8 16 Rai Ram NO Det
9 Atl 4 7 15 Ram Was Ram TB
10 Dal 4 6 14 Hou Pit Was Ari
11 Cle 4 6 14 Ari Cin Ind NYJ
12 GB 3 8 14 Min TB Ram
13 NYJ 3 7 13 Buf Den Ind
14 Pit 3 7 13 Cle Ind Hou
15 Det 2 8 12 Atl Dal
16 NYG 3 6 12 Ari Phi Was
17 Sea 3 6 12 Rai Pit Was
18 NE 3 5 11 Cin Det GB
19 TB 2 6 10 Ind Atl
20 NO 2 5 9 TB NYG
21 Ram 2 4 8 Ari KC
22 Ind 2 4 8 Hou Sea
23 Rai 2 4 8 Den NE
24 Ari 1 4 6 Min
25 Den 1 3 5 Sea
26 Was 1 2 4 NO
27 Hou 1 0 2 Cin
28 Cin 0 0 0
|
9.2423 | Not hyped-filled quotes; *facts* | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 11 1994 15:04 | 19 |
|
> so Marshall Faulk has shown with his two 60 yard performances and
> a two fumble performance that he's not nearly ready to join Barry
> and Emmitt, if he ever will be. Yes, let's appreciate these guys
> while they're playing and striding toward greatness but let's not
> get so wrapped up in the hype that we read way too much into simple
> quotes and are ready to can(t)onize these guys before they've hardly
> tasted NFL action.
Save it for someone who cares. The only thing I've objected to is the
ridiculous notion that a rookie who is leading the AFC in rushing
yardage, yards per carry average, and rushing touchdowns has done
"nothing" yet, has experienced continuing "woes", etc. All for a
lousy team that has one of the lowest passing outputs in the league
and has few other options. The spin placed on the occasional failure
with no credit given to successes is just dishonest; nothing less.
glenn
|
9.2424 | Like who cares... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Tue Oct 11 1994 16:31 | 4 |
| Id like to see Flutie and his team take on the marlboro shamrocks,
out wait the shamrocks are in a tougher league....
mab
|
9.2426 | Nope, that was also a straight-up, completely innocent summation | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 11 1994 17:42 | 31 |
|
> The leading the AFC in various categories is deceiving (not that
> you would be *purposely* decpetive. ha!). Faulk has played one more
> game than Barry Foster and Natrone Means who both haven't gone three
> straight weeks without a hundred yard game as Faulk has. That's a fact.
No matter how you attempt to slice it, it's still pretty darned good.
Which is the only thing I've ever said. I have never claimed that
Faulk is better than Smith, Sanders, Foster, or Bettis. Just that
he's played well; very well in fact. It's up to you to explain how
leading the league in all those categories under _any_ circumstances
(gaining 90 and 93 yards instead of the magical 100, etc.) is somehow
substandard. Perspective. I believe your idea of that was "so far
he's done nothing".
> And turning "I'd like to think we'll see some improvement" into
> "if he doesn;t improve one iota..." is what. Something Honest George
> Washington would be proud of? Please.
I believe the correct comparison would be to "I'd like to think we'll
see some improvement but if there is no room for improvement..."
("no", as in none, as in not at all). "If there is no room for
improvement", "if he doesn't improve one iota". Hmmm, I'm busted.
Go back to what I wrote in 56.1222 and then read Ryan's interpretation
in 56.1243. There is absolutely no difference in meaning with my
paraphrase. Now if you're also in disagreement with how others also
took the comment, that's fine, but I did not misrepresent the article
in any way.
glenn
|
9.2427 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Oct 11 1994 18:09 | 28 |
| re .2426
This is what you originally wrote:
"Yesterday I read a quote from the great Bill Parcells where he
said that even if Bledsoe were not to improve one iota further,
his progress to quality finished product is still the fastest that
he's ever seen."
Sound like Bill is fairly gushing. But wait! Here's what Bill really
said:
"I would like to think we'll see some improvement," says Parcells.
"But if there is no room for improvement then this is the fastest
acceleration to completion I've ever seen."
"If he doesn't improve" not "even if he doesn't improve one iota". If
he doesn't improve one iota of course it would be the fastest accel-
eration that Bill has only seen - the kid has only played eighteen
games! No one is a complete quarterback after just eighteen games not
even Drew. Not even Marino. Bill said "I would like to think we'll see
some improvement" because there's plenty of room for it but your mangling
of the quote leaves that completely out. There's no mention of "quality
finished product" either. That was another one of your addendums. And
today Bob Ryan fesses up that he fawns over Drew. Pile your gushing on
top of Bob's gushing and it amounts to SPORTS' version of start a rumor
at one end of a room and see what it is transformed into at the other
end. "Coach Bill said Drew is better than Unitas already!"
|
9.2428 | In certain rare instances, I have no problem with "fawning" | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 11 1994 18:51 | 38 |
|
> "If he doesn't improve" not "even if he doesn't improve one iota". If
> he doesn't improve one iota of course it would be the fastest accel-
> eration that Bill has only seen - the kid has only played eighteen
> games! No one is a complete quarterback after just eighteen games not
> even Drew. Not even Marino. Bill said "I would like to think we'll see
> some improvement" because there's plenty of room for it but your mangling
> of the quote leaves that completely out. There's no mention of "quality
> finished product" either.
I thought it was obvious that "quality finished product", "acceleration
to completion", whatever, still falls well short of "greatness;
Unitas-like in stature". Hence my use of the conditional, "even if",
as in this probably isn't all there is. Seriously, when I entered that
I didn't think it would be so wildly controversial, and as far as I
know Bob Ryan hasn't been deluged with angry letters either. ;-)
As for the accusation of fawning, guilty as charged! Consider it to
be nothing more than an early prediction (same for Faulk), if you
must. When Roger Clemens struck out 20 batters early in 1986 and then
went on to win 24 games in his first full season, you didn't need the
complete encyclopedic career record of a polished pitcher in front of
you to know that you were witnessing greatness, even if there is
always the possibility that something can go horribly wrong. If you
missed that magic because Clemens wasn't established enough it's too
bad because team circumstances dictated that it was never quite as
good again. Same thing with Bledsoe. I'm saying straight up that
we're seeing the same thing here, appreciating it in the present, well
in advance of the phony post-facto "you could see it from the very
start". And why not? If you believe that, then say it. Bob Ryan once
again deserves credit for that, instead of churning out the formulaic
"let's wait and see" stuff of boredom. It's a major part of the fun
of sports. To me, as usual, it's the thousands of kids descending on
Foxborough in their Bledsoe jerseys that are the ones not over-analyzing
this kind of a rarity and properly seeing it for what it is.
glenn
|
9.2429 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 11 1994 21:25 | 6 |
9.2430 | | O8SIS::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Wed Oct 12 1994 08:00 | 6 |
| Saw something in the Globe whereby the writer (Ryan, I think) asked
the question of what the reaction would be if if had been Flutie last
Sunday for the Pats who had so many passes batted-down/tipped.
Interesting, to say the least.
Lee
|
9.2431 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 12 1994 10:45 | 9 |
| Flutie had some decent games for the Pats. In fact I believe that in one
season their record with Flutie playing was better than their record without
him playing.
One thing for sure, the only time that I was able to stomach watching the
Patriots between their AFL days and now was when Flutie was playing. He was
fun to watch. I like QBs who scramble. Sort of like Fran Tarkinton.
George
|
9.2432 | Flutie's record speaks for itself | 25022::BREEN | | Wed Oct 12 1994 11:38 | 13 |
| Flutie was forced upon the Patriots by Pat Sullivan, in part as a
strike breaker - Flutie had one choice, play in the strike game or get
out of nfl.
His was the most obvious case of a "scab" being forced out of the
league by teammates not putting forth the effort (when he qb'ed). What
evidence do I have? Just my observation and a lot of between the lines
talk, specifically a Nick Cafardo reference I talked about before.
His CFL performances though have vindicated his ability. Warren Moon
and Joe Theisman had similar CFL records and went on the NFL.
Also, while with the Patriots his record was far superior to Eason's.
|
9.2433 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Oct 12 1994 11:59 | 21 |
| >> Seriously, when I entered that I didn't think it would be so wildly
>> controversial, and as far as I know Bob Ryan hasn't been deluged with
>> angry letters either. ;-)
That's because anyone who reads Ryan knows he tends to go overboard
when he becomes enamoured of a Boston sports figure. Witness his
article earlier this year on the genius of Bill Parcells and of how
every press conference is a cathartic learning experience. You, on
the other hand, were known as an incurable gusher but this twisting
of stats and quotes is something new. What's more is, it all would have
gone unnoticed or at least unmentioned if when I said that I didn't
interpret the Parcells quote the same way you did, you didn't come back
with "I guess the fact that it came at the end of a Bob-Ryan-gushes-over
latest-Boston-hero column as a kicker of "and if you don't believe
me, this quote from the Big Tuna himself pretty much says it all"
didn't tip you off." Stupid me! I guess I just are dum. Of course, you
made up all of that "Big Tuna" stuff just like you made up the "if he
doesn't improve one iota" stuff. Very disturbing. Appreciating Drew
(and I do) is one thing but fabricating quotes to elevate him even
further is quite another.
|
9.2434 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | Have U hugged Jerry Garcia today? | Wed Oct 12 1994 12:37 | 3 |
| Bob Ryan is a wannabee.
Mark.
|
9.2436 | GAG! | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Oct 12 1994 14:18 | 1 |
| ...and he lost it in a big way too!
|
9.2437 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 12 1994 16:25 | 3 |
9.2438 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Oct 12 1994 16:44 | 1 |
| It was a bet on Browns' fans being smarter than dawgs.
|
9.2439 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 12 1994 22:36 | 3 |
9.2440 | | HANNAH::ASHE | What's the frequency, Robert? | Thu Oct 13 1994 11:46 | 3 |
| Anyone know who starts at QB for the Rams this week? Chandler?
Miller?
|
9.2441 | 6-3? | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Thu Oct 13 1994 12:38 | 6 |
|
Flutie was 6-3 I believe when he last q-b'd for the Pats.
Saw him live against the Bengals ( Pats won) he really floats the
ball...
|
9.2442 | Miller injured, surely you jest! | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Antelope Freeway, One Mile | Thu Oct 13 1994 12:48 | 9 |
| re .2440 - Atlanta paper says Miller is still the starting QB, so
unless he's hurt (he's never hurt, is he? :-)), he be startin'.
The paper also said that LA's starting center and tackle will be out
(Injured). Looks like ol' Chrissy may get to taste the turf this weekend.
UMDan
|
9.2443 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Oct 13 1994 12:54 | 4 |
| I heard Miller was starting too.
Groaner, why don't you do the right thing and take Drexler off my
hands.
|
9.2444 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Thu Oct 13 1994 13:12 | 3 |
|
Chandler is listed as probable
|
9.2445 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 13 1994 13:34 | 5 |
9.2446 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Oct 13 1994 13:47 | 2 |
| Miner's not even on your roster, you wanker. If you were really nice,
you'd give me Jackson.
|
9.2447 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:11 | 8 |
9.2448 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:41 | 1 |
| Miner is on there now since the corrected version was just posted. ;-)
|
9.2449 | | HANNAH::ASHE | What's the frequency, Robert? | Thu Oct 13 1994 14:56 | 4 |
| Is this an NFL discussion...
I'd give you Hardaway Heiser, but I don't own the team anymore...
|
9.2450 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Oct 13 1994 17:29 | 1 |
| Well you should've thought about that last week, you turkey!
|
9.2451 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and I'm feeeeelin' strong... | Thu Oct 13 1994 17:30 | 2 |
| Well, I didn't want to be accused of dumping... I thought about it
and nixed the deal...
|
9.2452 | whole new twist to Penny | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Oct 13 1994 17:33 | 4 |
| I would've given you Drexler for him! That's an even trade if there
ever was one. Especially since the $134M man may not play.
Mike
|
9.2453 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Thu Oct 13 1994 17:39 | 5 |
|
So, Mike, if you think Drexler for Penny is an even deal, I'm sure
you'd be happy to trade Mourning for Daugherty - right?
Joe
|
9.2454 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Oct 13 1994 20:35 | 1 |
| Only if Brad's back gets better.
|
9.2455 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | It's nobody's fault but mine.... | Thu Oct 13 1994 23:56 | 4 |
| Any updates on the Brown(spot)s(tm) and the Oilscum????
JaKe
|
9.2456 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Fri Oct 14 1994 09:33 | 3 |
|
Brownies 11 Hou 8
|
9.2457 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | Terrapin Station >> Sgt. Pepper | Fri Oct 14 1994 09:41 | 3 |
| Browns covered.
Mark.
|
9.2458 | under | HBAHBA::HAAS | australopithecus westvirginius | Fri Oct 14 1994 10:15 | 0 |
9.2459 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and I'm feeeeelin' strong... | Fri Oct 14 1994 10:55 | 3 |
| He was going to give me Drexler and Thorpe. I wanted something with
draft picks...
|
9.2460 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | It's nobody's fault but mine.... | Fri Oct 14 1994 16:42 | 6 |
| 11-8, what were they playing, baseball?????
What a wimpy score.
JaKe
|
9.2461 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Oct 14 1994 16:47 | 5 |
| > 11-8, what were they playing, baseball?????
Nope, worse than that,...soccer.
Keith
|
9.2462 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sun Oct 16 1994 17:25 | 3 |
9.2463 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 17 1994 15:52 | 18 |
| Just going by records, the A.F.C. east seems to be the strongest division
in the NFL with one game left to go in week 7.
I added up the wins and losses this morning and as a division the A.F.C. East
is something like 19-16 which comes to 3 more wins than losses against teams
from other divisions. The A.F.C. West is up 2 games while the A.F.C. Central is
down 4.
Over in the N.F.C., one division is down 1 game (the East I think) while the
other two are even with the same number of wins and losses.
Adding up the wins and losses by conference the A.F.C. is +1 in the win
column and the N.F.C. is -1 in the win column.
Of course the teams don't play balanced schedules and this is only 7 weeks
into the season so take the numbers for what they are worth.
George
|
9.2464 | He almost keelt Denver single-handed way back | PTOS01::JACOBR | It's nobody's fault but mine.... | Mon Oct 17 1994 19:53 | 14 |
| Former STEELER and current(until today, that is) Bears running back
Merril Hoge retired from football today.
Hoge had suffered 2 concussions this season(and one last year) and is
still having dizzy spells and experiencing memory loss from the one he
suffered 2 weeks ago. Hoge had seen specialists here in Pittsburgh
earlier this week, and after performing numerous tests on him they told
him that he could suffer a very serious injury if he were to play again
and recieve another concussion. Hoge also, reportedly, talked with
other former NFL players who had had their careers cut short by
concussions.
JaKe
|
9.2465 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dwayne Barry KNOWS! | Tue Oct 18 1994 09:40 | 4 |
|
dam those Patriots they cost me a perfect week in the Pool.........
mike
|
9.2467 | | CAMONE::WAY | Charge men, for God's sake, Charge! | Tue Oct 18 1994 09:47 | 26 |
| I have a question:
Why is the taunting/celebration rule not more consistently applied?
This was a topic of discussion on the FAN last night, but I
arrived at my destination before it was discussed, but I thought it
was a good one.
The basis of discussion was that two weeks ago, a long reception
by Chris Calloway was called back to the line of scrimmage and
then some, after he spiked the ball and trash-talked a little to
a New Orleans DB.
Sunday, Neon Deion picks off a pass, takes it 93 yards for the
score, and the last 20 yards he's strutting and taunting the Falcon's
bench.
Is there a double standard?
Kind of going along with all of that, in the games I've seen so far this
year, the officiating seems really inconsistent from game to game.
Any comments?
|
9.2468 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Tue Oct 18 1994 09:57 | 8 |
| I cannot understand why stuff like dunking the ball over the goalposts
or a prearranged sack dance isn't considered taunting. If I was a
defensive player and some WR that just scored on me would jump up to
dunk the ball over the goal post, I'd HAVE to low bridge him and drop
him on his haid, just for GPs.
Dennis Faust
|
9.2469 | some refs have low tolerence points | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dwayne Barry KNOWS! | Tue Oct 18 1994 09:57 | 8 |
|
of course there's a double standard. Depends upon your star quality. Also
if you're coach is a whiner (Reeves most definately is) the refs like to
get even with you the coach when they can. They also like to see the veins
in the coach's neck buldge. ;^)
No way Dieon should have made that inty. He and Rison should have been
tossed for that sissyass fight.
|
9.2470 | cliches 'r us | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Oct 18 1994 10:32 | 15 |
| 'No-taunting' rules are ridiculous IMHO. Hell, if the guy can
'walk his walk' then he deserves to 'talk his talk'. If he can't
then he only succeeds in making a fool of himself.
Let a defensive end do his little dance after making a huge sack, but
he damn well better be ready to watch the offensive lineman do the same
when he makes a good block on the same DE that springs a running back.
What comes around goes around.
Don't try and tell me that if they didn't try and do away with the
taunting then the game would get more volitile. This ain't no
game of tidly winks!
billl
|
9.2471 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 10:56 | 23 |
| The no celebrating rule is one of the most blatant examples of racisism in
sports. Face it, players have been celebrating touchdowns ever since football
began and they still do. Homecoming is one giant celebration which is mostly
football oriented and it's a time honored tradition. None of these activities
has ever been called into question.
What happened was that a couple decades ago black athletes started doing
celebrations that were not lily white in nature and steeped in college
tradition and the NFL, aware that the TV audience was mostly white and a good
part racist, decided to put a stop to it with the no celebration rule.
Do you think that Major League baseball considered a no celebration rule when
Yogi Bera ran out and jumped on Don Larson after his perfect game? Heck no, but
one or two Mosy Shuffles in the end zone was all it took to get the good ol'
boys who run the NFL to come up with this ridiculous rule.
All teams celebrate after touchdowns and the rule is clear, if it's a
traditional white type of celebration it's fine but if it hints at the afro
American culture, it's off limits.
The no celebration rule is a disgrace to football and should be abolished.
George
|
9.2472 | "Couple decades ago", "put a stop to it"... pure fiction... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 18 1994 11:18 | 19 |
|
> What happened was that a couple decades ago black athletes started doing
> celebrations that were not lily white in nature and steeped in college
> tradition and the NFL, aware that the TV audience was mostly white and a good
> part racist, decided to put a stop to it with the no celebration rule.
You're entitled to your opinions, but you severely undermine them with
something as innacurate as the above. There is not a blanket
no-celebration rule in the NFL. There is a no-taunting rule, however,
and I think that rule was stiffened, but only in the last few years.
Apparently the NFL hasn't done a very good job in applying that rule
liberally as part of its racial conspiracy because on any given
Sunday all manner of such celebrations are evident, go unpenalized
and have so for years (even the no-taunting penalty is rarely called).
In fact the NFL separated itself from the college game a long time
ago on what it permits in its endzones.
glenn
|
9.2473 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Tue Oct 18 1994 11:21 | 2 |
| Uh, I thought the taunting rule came from guys like Mark Gastineau
first.
|
9.2474 | | CAMONE::WAY | Charge men, for God's sake, Charge! | Tue Oct 18 1994 11:44 | 7 |
| Yeah, I was just going to say that.
Gastineau's "Sack Dance" was instrumental in the no taunting rule. Last time
I checked, Mark was white....
'Saw
|
9.2475 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Tue Oct 18 1994 11:51 | 3 |
| ... I guess only Brigitte Nielsen and his ex-wife would know for
sure...
|
9.2476 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 11:52 | 21 |
| I'm just going by what I see and as you say where it is applied.
People have been arguing and fighting in sports for many years and no one
ever made a rule to stop it if it didn't come to actual blows. It was about the
time that athletes started personalizing end zone celebrations and adding dance
type steps that suddenly for the 1st time rules started appearing limiting what
someone could do in the end zone after scoring a touch down.
It seems to me that if someone scores a touchdown they should be able to jump
around in any manner that they feel so moved to do. What's wrong with spiking
the ball over the cross bar, on the ground, dancing around or anything else?
Now if they haul off and slug a guy from the other team, sure throw them out
of the game, but as long as no one gets punched, why limit celebrations in any
way at all?
Say what you like, I'm skeptical about the motivation behind this rule. No
other sport limits celebration and certainly no one limits traditional types
of celebration like jumping up and down, piling on team mates that score, etc.
George
|
9.2478 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:16 | 8 |
| | is one thing but pre-planned MC Hammer imitations are another.
Many of these guys are mugging it up for the cameras, not
celebrating. It is their continued shot at fame. Notice
how many guys are ripping their helmets off after a TD
these days?
=Bob=
|
9.2479 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | These boys need a house! | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:16 | 12 |
| -.1 I agree. Every highlight film that you see has someone in the
endzone holding their hands up, asking the crowd to look at them, as
if they were the first person on the face of the earth to score a TD.
Even the high school kids are doing it! A game winning TD maybe
deserves a celebration, but not every TD, tackle, interception or 15+
yard run. Give the ref the ball and get back to the d*** huddle.
My .02.
UMDan
|
9.2480 | Are you intentionally starting trouble??? | AD::HEATH | No please not Kevin Kennedy | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:17 | 12 |
|
George so if what you are saying is true there should have been a flag
on Joe Carter's series ending homerun in 93 and they should've brough it
back and replayed the pitch???? Get real Billy "Whiteshoes" Johnson
was one of the first real dancers that I remember and he was long
retired before the no taunting rule came into effect. Prime Slime was
really goin at it after his int return for a TD and the only penalty he
got was a strained groin. Looks to me like your trying to start
something that isn't there.
Jerry
|
9.2481 | Is Tim McCarver in the building? (that's a taunt, George ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:20 | 8 |
|
I still can't believe that Deion Sanders didn't get bounced for that
actual _fight_, though. They can pretty much toss out any no-fighting,
no-taunting-before-there's-a-fight and any other rule if they're not
going to enforce that.
glenn
|
9.2482 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:25 | 14 |
| > Say what you like, I'm skeptical about the motivation behind this rule. No
>other sport limits celebration and certainly no one limits traditional types
>of celebration like jumping up and down, piling on team mates that score, etc.
Baseball has it by the next pitch being chin music...
Basketball does it (in theory) by giving T's for taunting and hanging
on the rim...
Hockey would do it by cold cocking the guy up side the haid...
Wrasslin' does it by the puny runt manager hitting the guy from
behind...
|
9.2483 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:25 | 35 |
| So when Yogie Berra ran out and jumped in Don Larson's arms after the last
pitch of his perfect game was that tacky? Should Berra have just rolled the
ball back toward the mound and headed off toward the shower?
American football is always being compared to soccer, is it tacky when the
guy who just scored a goal sprints in front of the goalie with both arms in the
air while the announcers yells "gooooooooooalllllll"? Should he just trot back
to his position after the ball goes in the net?
What about when Elway was celebrating last night after he scored? What about
when Marino sprints down the field after a touchdown pass and piles on the guy
who caught the ball?
Celebrating in sports happens all the time. Every touchdown, field goal,
soccer goal, run in a close world series game etc, etc, results in players
jumping around, piling on each other, waving their arms in the air, jumping up
and down, etc, etc, etc.
The only rule I've ever seen limiting any of this is the "Hammer" style end
zone celebration in football.
The idea that celebration incites fights is ridiculous. If someone is stupid
enough to let the other team score they deserve to have someone get in their
face. If the other team doesn't do it the coach sure will when the player
gets back to the bench.
Celebrating scores in sports is fundamental to a game. The whole point of
having sports is to have fun and celebrate when you win. Why not let a player
who just caught a 50 yard pass slam dunk it over the cross bar?
If America is suppose to be the land of freedom, why should there be more
restrictions on American football celebrations than there are on European
football celebrations?
George
|
9.2484 | put an end to this nonsense | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:33 | 8 |
| So George you are compaining that the call is not made consistently? well
welcome to the REAL world! Remember you started by claiming the rule
was put in because of racism; now you're slowly but surely backing off
another far-fetched idea (which we all assume by now is just to stir things
up) and going back to the age old complaint of ITS NOT FAIR.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2485 | | CAMONE::WAY | Charge men, for God's sake, Charge! | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:43 | 11 |
| One of the points brought up on FAN last night was that Gastineau would
do his sack dance even if the Jets were down 35-7.
I guess the concept of TEAM has weakened over the years, and the concept
of I-I-me-me has grown.
Berra running to congratulate Larsen was just that. Yogi wasn't over in
front of the Dodgers bench wagging a finger at them...... Big difference.
'Saw
|
9.2487 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Tue Oct 18 1994 12:59 | 2 |
|
Bring back Elmo Wright!
|
9.2488 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Oct 18 1994 13:19 | 6 |
| It amazes me how people take so many trivial things and attempt to tie
them into racism. Like the thought of an emotional athlete expressing
themselves in an emotional game never occurred.
get a grip,
Mike
|
9.2489 | You've made the point why there's some place for sportsmanship | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Oct 18 1994 13:26 | 14 |
|
>> If someone is stupid enough to let the other team score they deserve
>> to have someone get in their face. If the other team doesn't do it
>> the coach sure will when the player gets back to the bench.
>
> That's the first time that I've seen scoring directly and completely
> equated to mental acuity.
That bizarre statement stood out for me, too. So much for "the whole
point of having sports is to have fun". "Fun" if you're not the
"stupid" one "deserving" to have someone in your face...
glenn
|
9.2490 | Just an opinion | ELMAGO::BENBACA | AtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th. | Tue Oct 18 1994 13:31 | 9 |
| Hey, what ever happened to the real "touchdowns"? The word itself
implies scoring and touching the ball down on the turf on one knee
like in the olden days. :-)
Seriously though,
I think spiking the ball is good enough. The dancing and showing off
should be limited to doing it on your teams side of the field, not
the endzone or the field of play.
|
9.2491 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Tue Oct 18 1994 13:34 | 4 |
| There's a big difference between something choreographed and something
spontaneous. If Berra runs to the mound and he and Larson do the World
Series Shuffle on the mound, that's bad.
|
9.2492 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 13:45 | 18 |
| Geez, talk about hitting the hot button.
Who cares if someone celebration appears to be choreographed?
This is America. We are suppose to be setting the standard of freedom of
expression for the world. This is suppose to be the place where people say
what they think or feel and others deal with it rather than suppressing
expression to keep things neat and pretty.
And the NFL exists so that 1100 guys can get exercise? Winning means nothing?
I like that.
Do away with all celebration rules and let people celebrate the way they
want. If someone starts a fight because they let someone score then didn't like
their celebration, that's the guy who should get tossed. Rather than starting a
fight he should score then do his own celebration.
George
|
9.2493 | Taunting & celebration are different | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Oct 18 1994 13:54 | 19 |
| I don't think taunting has any place in sports. What Deon Sanders did and
said a couple of days ago was very distasteful to me. Actions like his,
really turn me off to the NFL. That's just part of the reason why I seem to
watch more and more college football and less and less pro football every
year. He shouldda been tossed when he started the fight and he shouldda
been tossed as he taunted the whole Atlanta team.
Excessive celebration is another thing all together and id quite different
from taunting. I thing it's a horrible rule. If a celebration interferes
with the game, they can call delay of the game but 15 yards is too much.
I'm not aware of any excessive celebrations calls in pro football but
college ball had 2 mind boggling calls this year. One was when Syracuse came
back from a 28 point deficit and took the lead in the final minute. The 15
yard penaly allowed Oklahoma to kick the winning field goal on the last play.
The other came after the Colorado Hail Mary in Michigan. At least that one
had no affect on the game. What do they expect the players to do after
making an amazing comeback or winning the game on the last play ?
Keith
|
9.2494 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:26 | 16 |
| There was a play in a Giants game this year where Cris Calloway caught
a ball around the opponent's 10 yard line. He got up and spiked the
ball near a defender. He got hit with an unsportsmanlike conduct call
and instead of 1st and goal at the 10, it was at the 25... they didn't
score and it cost them the game. It must have been against NO. Was
it taunting? Was it a celebration? It was pale to what Deion did
over the weekend.
Letting them settle it on their own leads to what Dale Hunter did to
Pierre Turgeon in the '93 playoffs. He gave him a cheap shot, Turgeon
misses the rest of the playoffs and the Islanders get eliminated in the
next round. Someone needs to take the reins of the game and keep it
under control.
If you want to go to Berra's time, didn't they shut down Jimmy Piersall
after he ran the bases backwards after a HR?
|
9.2495 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:28 | 6 |
| Walt, that case was even worse. The penalty, if I recall negated
the entire play and the yards were marked off from where the play
began.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2496 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:29 | 1 |
| That's right... I forgot...
|
9.2497 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:38 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2494 by HANNAH::ASHE "and now... the end is near..." >>>
> If you want to go to Berra's time, didn't they shut down Jimmy Piersall
> after he ran the bases backwards after a HR?
As I recall Piersall was committed to a mental institution during his 1st
season after losing his grip on reality and freaking out during or after one of
the games. It wasn't really a celebration, more a case of cracking due to the
pressure.
It seems to me that if you punch, kick or otherwise attack a player then
sure, bounce him from the game. If a player throws the ball or anything else
at a player then fine I have no problem with cracking down on that.
What I don't like the rule that seems to limit the celebration in the end
zone when no opponent is really involved. So what if someone wants to take
off their helmet, dance around, and spike the ball over the cross bar? Where's
the harm?
George
|
9.2498 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dwayne Barry KNOWS! | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:44 | 11 |
|
> What I don't like the rule that seems to limit the celebration in the end
> zone when no opponent is really involved. So what if someone wants to take
> off their helmet, dance around, and spike the ball over the cross bar? Where's
> the harm?
sets a bad example for young impressionable minds. I for one think this is a
bad thing.
mike
|
9.2499 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 14:54 | 7 |
| Yea, we can't have our young people going around taking off their hats,
dancing, and doing make believe slam dunks when ever they get happy.
That's what the NFL is, it's an organization dedicated to keeping hats
on kids during times of random celebration.
George
|
9.2501 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dwayne Barry KNOWS! | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:10 | 8 |
|
there used to be a thing called sportsmanship. Obviously you don't think that
counts for anything. it's cool to celebrate and kick a man when he's down is
your opinion. Sad very sad. I'm not against the kids or the pros celebrating
but do it together with your teammates on the sideline where you're not trying
to show someone up.
mike
|
9.2502 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:13 | 26 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2500 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> George, I think I'm safe in saying that you're the only person
> on the entire planet that feels just a smidge freer because
> Deion can strut and cut after a touchdown.
Ok, so I'm waiting but I'm not hearing an answer. Where's the harm? So what
if someone celebrates after scoring? Who gets harmed? How is anyone's life
worse after a celebration?
Say that you were giving the closing argument in a civil case and you were
trying to convince a jury to award money damages to your client to harm
inflicted because Dion Sanders showed off after a touch down. What's the tragic
story you would tell about your client that would bring tears to the eyes of
the jury and compel them to award your client the fortune of which you would
get your 1/3rd?
> Sports, George, sports. That was the original statement, you're
> stated belief that sports exist for the purpose of winning then
> celebrating.
This note is the NFL note and the topic is restrictions on celebrations after
scoring touchdowns. Scoring leads to winning and "in this league, winning is
everything". Not my words.
George
|
9.2503 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:15 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2501 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Dwayne Barry KNOWS!" >>>
> there used to be a thing called sportsmanship. Obviously you don't think that
> counts for anything. it's cool to celebrate and kick a man when he's down is
> your opinion. Sad very sad. I'm not against the kids or the pros celebrating
> but do it together with your teammates on the sideline where you're not trying
> to show someone up.
When did I ever say I was in favor of kicking someone? In fact I stated a
few notes earlier that I am all in favor of tossing someone from the game if
they strike, kick, or throw something at another player.
What I'm talking about is end zone celebrations which seem to be restricted
by the NFL even when they don't involve players from the other team. What's
wrong with that?
George
|
9.2504 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dwayne Barry KNOWS! | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:22 | 11 |
|
please George don't tell me that you didn't realize that kick a man while
he's down is just an expression and not the actual act. Also when did the
NFL restrick them from celebrating? I see guys dancing all the time so where's
the restriction? Sure they might have a rule but they certainly don't enforce
it.
some guys will do anything to read themselves in print......
mike
|
9.2505 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:24 | 5 |
| >> This is America. We are suppose to be setting the standard of
>> freedom of expression for the world. This is suppose to be the
such a freedom is no longer a freedom when it infringes on someone
else's freedom. This is probably the intent of the NFL taunting rule.
|
9.2506 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:27 | 7 |
|
George,
Do you mind if I hum "America the Beautiful" whilst I read
some of your notes?
Claybone
|
9.2507 | Flag on the ploy | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:34 | 9 |
| Psssst, hey sprotsters....
It seems perfectly clear that George is "taunting" you and should be
given a fifteen yard penalty. Of course the other alternative is to
just IGNORE him and eventually he'll stop. The first assertion of
"racism" in sports is laughable at best.
Frank "field judge" Mendez
|
9.2508 | The Piersall saga | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:36 | 29 |
| Piersall was committed to the mental institution early in his career
after suffering depression and acting very strangely culiminating in a
famous fistfight under the stands with Billy Martin; I'd guess this was
1952 (early, possibly 1951).
He then came back and had a great 5 or so years with the RedSox moving
from RightField to Centerfield after the Umphlett experiment ended and
same was traded for Jensen of the Senators (Cronin's greatest move).
Piersall engaged in many manic but entertaining incidents with the
Redsox AFTER the institutionalization but was never considered insane
but merely comically crazy and was immensely popular with Redsox fans.
As another noter mentioned the Sox outfield of him,Jensen and Williams
was one of the 10 best all time with jp and jj being tremendous and
great and Ted being the one and only. Piersall had an outstanding arm
before foolishly indulding in a throwing contest with Willie Mays and
hurting it.
Piersall was traded to the Indians (Vic Wertz?) and later played in the
National League where I believe the reverse trip occurred. I would
guess he was never "crazy" but merely had a severe depression and then
a career marked by a love of fun.
Goldenbrok's "FENWAY", (available as a loaner since I'm currently very
space conscious) talks in some detail about Piersall. There is no
overstating his defensive skills even with the subsequent average arm
and personally his year(s) in right were even more spectacular.
Billte
|
9.2509 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:37 | 18 |
| Re <<< Note 9.2505 by FRETZ::HEISER "Grace changes everything" >>>
> such a freedom is no longer a freedom when it infringes on someone
> else's freedom. This is probably the intent of the NFL taunting rule.
How so?
I remember a few years back when guys would score a touchdown and start a
celebration that looked something like a dance. It was obviously practiced,
guys would jump up hit the other guy's hand, cross hands, etc. The NFL put
a stop to that by passing the end zone celebration rule.
What I'm wondering and what I've always wondered is who was harmed by this
activity and why should it not be allowed? What's wrong with things like
"slam dunking" the ball over the cross bar? Why not just let the players
celebrate?
George
|
9.2510 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:43 | 10 |
| �> such a freedom is no longer a freedom when it infringes on someone
�> else's freedom. This is probably the intent of the NFL taunting rule.
�
� How so?
celebratory dancing shouldn't infringe on my freedom to not have to be
subjected to bad dancing. Just as bad singers are banned to singing in
the shower where nobody will hear them.
Mike
|
9.2511 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:49 | 9 |
| But some of this dancing was actually quite good. Far more thought went into
those end zone dances than Dan Marino running down the field and falling on
the receiver that caught his pass.
At any rate, there was obviously no harm in that type of celebration so
why make a rule against that when no other sport has rules against celebrations
after a score?
George
|
9.2512 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dwayne Barry KNOWS! | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:52 | 7 |
|
sure frank we realize this but if we don't play along, george might end up
on the top of the Prudential with a 30 odd 6 pluggin' innocent predestrians
or worst yet letting the air out of illegal psrked cars at the next football
game..........
;^)
|
9.2513 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Oct 18 1994 15:55 | 15 |
| It's like the most recent trend of players praying after scoring. Some
might have been offended by the sight. I notice now that professing
Christians from both teams meet on the field *after* the game is over
to pray. At least some of them are trying to be considerate.
In similar manner, some (yeah they do still exist) might actually be
offended by certain pelvic gyrations. Some might be offended of seeing
someone flip the bird to the opponents after scoring. Some might be
offended when they read lips. And if you can't dance your way out of a
wet paper bag, you shouldn't subject others to such a display.
These are freedoms of expression, but they aren't really free if they
offend others.
Mike
|
9.2514 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:00 | 14 |
| How can someone be offended by dancing and not be offended by Dan Marino
running down the field and jumping up and down with his receiver.
It seems that the only difference is the thought that went into the form
of the celebration.
Now if they said no celebration at all was allowed and that after you score
there is no jumping, no back patting, just walk back to the bench then even
though it was stupid it would be fair but why not allow someone to dance?
Here again, we're not talking about screaming in someone's face, only about
guys dancing in the endzone. Who's offended?
George
|
9.2515 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:03 | 2 |
| I don't know who. Some people are. I *LIKED* Billy White Shoes
Johnson's celebrations.
|
9.2516 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:07 | 9 |
| I liked those celebrations as well. I thought they added a lot to the game
and I was really pissed off when they made the rule stopping them.
As I remember, the Mosey Shuffle was an attempt to get around the rule. As
I recall the rule said you couldn't jump but shuffling got you around the rule.
Anyway, that rule is nuts, bring back the celebration dance!
George
|
9.2517 | Mosey???? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:25 | 5 |
| I've been watchin football for some time and have never heard of the
"mosey shuffle". I have heard of the "Ickey shuffle". Who is this
"Mosey" guy anyway????
|
9.2518 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:28 | 5 |
| Ickey sounds right. It's been a while.
What was the rest of his name, I forget.
George
|
9.2519 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | It's nobody's fault but mine.... | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:29 | 8 |
| Wasn't the original "taunting" rule put in after, I think it was the
foreski....er...Redskins "Fun Bunch" would do their "dance", all what 6
or 7 guys in a circle, and the Cowboys and other team took exception to
it and started breaking it up themselves and starting fights by doind
so????
JaKe
|
9.2520 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:29 | 4 |
| George do you own options on our hard disk drive suppliers? You argue
for argument's sake and add zero value to the discussion.
Mark.
|
9.2521 | btw - maybe the "mosey" was Tatupu | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:41 | 5 |
| mark,
a friend of mine works for one of them dd suppliers. I need a
little fuel for some serious taunting next time I see him.
bb
|
9.2522 | HTH's | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Tue Oct 18 1994 16:44 | 3 |
|
ICKEY Woods
|
9.2524 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 17:04 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2520 by 24661::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing" >>>
> George do you own options on our hard disk drive suppliers? You argue
> for argument's sake and add zero value to the discussion.
Coming from you mark that's quite a criticism. The only time I ever see you
involved in a discussion it never has anything to do with sports. At least
I said something about a rule in a game that has to do with this note. Notice
that your comment above says nothing about that rule, nothing about football,
but as usual is no more than a complaint someone's notes.
Give a little effort Mark. Say something, anything about football, the rules
of football, the people who play football, anything that doesn't involve me
or some other noter.
You can't do it.
George
|
9.2525 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 18 1994 17:06 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2523 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>As for the
> celebrations, it's about sportsmanship. Plain and simple.
So if two guys score touchdowns, both celebrate in the endzone, both jump
around, but one had previously planned his moves, one is being a sportsmen
and the other is not?
You are right, I will never understand the logic behind that.
George
|
9.2526 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Tue Oct 18 1994 17:08 | 6 |
|
I motion that we replace the TM'd "@brokenrecord.com" with
a more suitable name..... "@maiewski.com". Do I hear a
second?
Claybone
|
9.2528 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Tue Oct 18 1994 17:17 | 27 |
|
It must just be me, but I haven't noticed the NFL cracking down on
endzone celebrations too much lately. On CNN Sports last night they
showed about 4 or 5 crossbar 'dunks' from sunday's games. Or how about
the Jets' Hasty running down to the endzone stands in Giants Stadium
after the last Bledsoe sack on Sunday?
I seem to remember the goals of the anti-celebration/taunting rules
were:
1) Put an end to the sack dances.
2) Players from the bench run into the endzone, and do a rehearsed
dance number after a TD.
3) Stop players from spiking the ball between downs on big plays,
as in the long reception that isn't a TD. (Isn't that an
automatic unsportsman-like or delay-of-game penalty?)
These rules stopped the celebrations from getting completely out of
hand. But the TD celebrations haven't gone away. They are just quick
spontaneous acts (for the most part) by the players involved.
JimH
|
9.2529 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Tue Oct 18 1994 18:21 | 6 |
| > So if two guys score touchdowns, both celebrate in the endzone, both jump
>around, but one had previously planned his moves, one is being a sportsmen
>and the other is not?
if it's directly in front of the other team and an "in your face" is
attached, I'd say yeah...
|
9.2530 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Yes I Am !!! | Wed Oct 19 1994 09:05 | 17 |
|
The comparison to Joe Carter hitting a world series winning home
run is totally bogus. The rules are simple enough if they are just
enforced. If you sack a guy, the guy should get back to his own huddle
and smack heads with his own teammates to celebrate. There is no need
for a Mark Gastineau sack dance.
Any spiking of the ball or mouthing off on a play that is not
a TD, Should be a penalty. Again if you get back to the huddle and
someone high fives you fine.
On TD's you should be able to spike the ball and celebrate with
your teammates. No doing a dance in front of the crowd to get them
wound up. No mouthing off to the other team.
When a WR catches a TD and then tosses the ball to the DB. It
should be a taunting penalty. You know the WR is giving the DB %^&*,
and mouthing off. We just can't hear it on TV.
Ron
|
9.2531 | | CAMONE::WAY | Charge men, for God's sake, Charge! | Wed Oct 19 1994 10:04 | 3 |
| Claybone, my main!
I second it.....
|
9.2532 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1994 11:15 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2529 by HANNAH::ASHE "and now... the end is near..." >>>
> if it's directly in front of the other team and an "in your face" is
> attached, I'd say yeah...
But what if it's not?
What I remember and what really ticked me off was when restrictions were put
on guys doing end zone celebrations that didn't even involve players from other
teams. Sounds to me like a violation of their 1st amendment right to freedom
of expression. Hardly the "American" thing to do. Talk about setting a bad
example.
As for the "in your face" stuff, if players don't want to see those things,
then all they have to do is prevent the other team from scoring touchdowns or
make big plays. Then the other team won't have anything to celebrate.
I can't stand the idea of rules who's sole purpose is to protect the feelings
of players who screw up and let the other team make a big play. I agree that
there are places where all the new touchie-feely protect the victim stuff makes
sense, but the grid iron is not one of them.
George
|
9.2533 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Oct 19 1994 11:34 | 10 |
|
> Sounds to me like a violation of their 1st amendment right
this coming from the person who argued (correctly I might add) that baseball
had the right to prevent or censure Marge Schott from saying racist things;
that the 1st amendment applies to the government making rules against
free speech and expression, and not private corporations.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2534 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1994 12:04 | 17 |
| No one is saying that the NFL doesn't have the right to suppress free speech
and free expression on the field. The question is, should they?
People are always talking about how football and other sports should set
an example for kids. Well what worse example can you set then to send a message
to kids saying that organizations should control the right of the individual
to express themselves even when no harm is involved?
Also, what kind of message is it to say to kids that if you fail to reach
your goal, don't try harder, just break up the other guy's celebration and
nag the authorities into making rules to protect your feelings from getting
hurt?
I realize that we are currently living out the decade of the victim but do
we need that on the football field as well?
George
|
9.2536 | | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Wed Oct 19 1994 12:40 | 2 |
|
"from sea to shining seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeea! "
|
9.2537 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 19 1994 12:55 | 13 |
| > No one is saying that the NFL doesn't have the right to suppress free speech
>and free expression on the field. The question is, should they?
>
Yes, they should.
> People are always talking about how football and other sports should set
>an example for kids.
Exactly the point. Kids are using athletes as role models (they shouldn't,
I agree), and it's appropriate for the powers that be in football legislating
the type of behavior that is appropriate for anyone in public.
I suppose George thinks it's OK for the guy who cuts me off on the freeway
to stop and taunt me about it.
|
9.2538 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Oct 19 1994 13:22 | 8 |
|
> I suppose George thinks it's OK for the guy who cuts me off on the freeway
> to stop and taunt me about it.
yabbut, ANY Boston driver would view that as their god given right.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2539 | | HANNAH::ASHE | and now... the end is near... | Wed Oct 19 1994 13:52 | 3 |
| So this is now an NFL debate, not one based on the fact that the rule
was racist, right?
|
9.2540 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Wed Oct 19 1994 13:55 | 15 |
|
>> I suppose George thinks it's OK for the guy who cuts me off on the freeway
>> to stop and taunt me about it.
>
>yabbut, ANY Boston driver would view that as their god given right.
No Boston driver worth his/her salt would "stop" and taunt. We do
our taunting on the move. Lest we give back the positional advantage
just gained by cutting somebody off!!!
JimH :-)
|
9.2541 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1994 13:56 | 24 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2537 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
> I suppose George thinks it's OK for the guy who cuts me off on the freeway
> to stop and taunt me about it.
Cutting someone off on the free way is against the law. Scoring a touchdown
is not only following the rules, it's the goal of what the offense is trying
to accomplish during a game.
So what I'm hearing is that rules should be made against organized attempts
at celebration to protect the feelings of football players.
Ok, so how about cheerleaders? After a touchdown they often do organized
cheers. Should the poor sensitive visiting players be protected from having
their feelings crushed by those wicked women after the home team scores 6
points?
And what about all those impressionable kids who see the cheer leaders
celebrating after a touchdown with their callous displays of rah-rah-rah,
taunting players by waving pom-poms in the air? How can we survive as a nation
with our youth feeling it's OK to be so cavalier throwing victory celebrations
on a moments notice?
George
|
9.2542 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1994 13:59 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2539 by HANNAH::ASHE "and now... the end is near..." >>>
> So this is now an NFL debate, not one based on the fact that the rule
> was racist, right?
Yes, I'm convinced that I was wrong when I suggested that the rule was
racist.
I now realize that the problem is that fans are concerned about the feelings
of football players being crushed by the callous celebration of players who
benefit from other players mistakes.
George
|
9.2543 | | CAMONE::WAY | Charge men, for God's sake, Charge! | Wed Oct 19 1994 14:08 | 7 |
|
See George.
See George debate.
See George flagilate the expired equine.
|
9.2544 | ... by the way it's "flagellate" | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1994 14:25 | 12 |
| Re <<< Note 9.2543 by CAMONE::WAY "Charge men, for God's sake, Charge!" >>>
> See George.
> See George debate.
> See George flagilate the expired equine.
DUCK!!
Whooo, another flying towel from someone who realizes that they were wrong
but can't quite come out and say it in so many words.
George
|
9.2545 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Oct 19 1994 14:30 | 5 |
| | Title: ... by the way it's "flagellate"
Personally, I prefer to flatulate...
=Bob= for JaKe
|
9.2546 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1994 14:34 | 3 |
| Or perhaps just flatten.
George
|
9.2547 | | CAMONE::WAY | Charge men, for God's sake, Charge! | Wed Oct 19 1994 15:34 | 21 |
| > Whooo, another flying towel from someone who realizes that they were wrong
>but can't quite come out and say it in so many words.
Hey, George, pull your head outta there and tell me where I stated anything
that said anything about this debate? I put in the original question
about the consistency of the rules, but have said nothing since. I've
just sat back and watched.
I could see *possibly* being wrong if I'd engaged in the debate. But
I didn't.....
And I know I misspelled that word but didn't bother to look it up. If I
wasn't sure, I would have put (sp?) after it, but I figured it wasn't worth
the time since I figured it was wrong anyway.
|
9.2548 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1994 15:35 | 3 |
| Gripe gripe gripe, complain complain complain.
George
|
9.2549 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Oct 19 1994 15:36 | 7 |
| > So what I'm hearing is that rules should be made against organized attempts
> at celebration to protect the feelings of football players.
We don't really know what you are hearing, but that isn't what is being
said. Can you find an instance where someone said these rules should be
passed to protect the feelings of football players, or is that a straw man
you've invented to shore up a weak argument ?
|
9.2550 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Oct 19 1994 16:30 | 52 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2549 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
> Can you find an instance where someone said these rules should be
> passed to protect the feelings of football players, or is that a straw man
> you've invented to shore up a weak argument ?
How about the two listed below?
What I'm trying to understand is just why there is a rule against players
celebrating after a score. I understand that my 1st impression was wrong and
that it's not racial bias against the players.
Now I seem to hear that people are concerned players taunting other players.
What harm does a taunt cause other than hurting someone's feelings. Remember
"sticks and stones ..."?
If that's not right then why is there rule against celebrations? What
possible harm could they cause? If they cause no harm, why have a rule against
them?
George
Two Examples of people complaining about taunts by football players.
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 9.2530 The National Football League (NFL) 2530 of 2549
SNAX::ERICKSON "Yes I Am !!!" 17 lines 19-OCT-1994 08:05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On TD's you should be able to spike the ball and celebrate with
> your teammates. No doing a dance in front of the crowd to get them
> wound up. No mouthing off to the other team.
> When a WR catches a TD and then tosses the ball to the DB. It
> should be a taunting penalty. You know the WR is giving the DB %^&*,
> and mouthing off. We just can't hear it on TV.
and
<<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< SPORTS >-
================================================================================
Note 9.2535 The National Football League (NFL) 2535 of 2549
MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" 10 lines 19-OCT-1994 11:38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Why are you people debating with someone who lumped Yogi
> Berra jumping for joy after the last pitch of Don Larsen's
> perfect game in with Deion dancing and prancing after a touch-
> down in a rout in a mid-season game?
|
9.2551 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 20 1994 09:47 | 33 |
| >> Can you find an instance where someone said these rules should be
>> passed to protect the feelings of football players, or is that a straw man
>> you've invented to shore up a weak argument ?
>
> How about the two listed below?
Wrong ! Try again ! Neither of these two said anything about the reason
behind the rule. In the former case, if one reads the whole note, rather
than the extract, it appears the author is only explaining how the current
rule, as written, should be enforced, if abided strictly to its written
description; it says nothing at all about the author's opinion on whether
it's a good or bad rule. The second says nothing about his opinion of the
rule, either; he's only trying to razz you a little.
> If that's not right then why is there rule against celebrations? What
>possible harm could they cause? If they cause no harm, why have a rule against
>them?
Let me try to explain it again, perhaps more simply so it sinks in.
The NFL does not create these rules to protect the feelings of players on
the other side; they do it to create an image in the minds of the public,
an image of good sportsmanship, rather than bad. Whether you agree with
it or not, that is what the motivation is.
What harm could it cause ? If enough kids used the super-jerks as role
models, as well as the attitudes displayed in other settings (movies, TV,
as well as sports), it could contribute to a decline in societal values
among the youth of today. Or, it could contribute to a loss of supplemental
income if parents stopped buying NFL apparel, etc., deciding that the
prime role models therein are classless jerks. In any case, this is about
image, money, and ratings, not about any feelings of players on the field,
I can assure you of that; NFL management isn't that interested in players'
feelings.
|
9.2552 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 20 1994 10:36 | 29 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2551 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
> The NFL does not create these rules to protect the feelings of players on
> the other side; they do it to create an image in the minds of the public,
> an image of good sportsmanship, rather than bad.
In what way is doing an organized dance in the end zone bad sportsmanship?
Two guys catch footballs, break tackles and run into the endzone. On both
cases their team mates run into the endzone and they celebrate. The only
difference is that the 1st group is doing random high fives and bashing helmets
while the 2nd group does a preplaned dance of sorts. In both cases the
cheerleaders do an organized dance type celebration.
In what way is that good sportsmanship by one team and bad sportsmanship by
the other? So a couple guys jump up in the air twice, cross their hands and
clap in some weird way, so what? Why should that sort of thing be banned?
> What harm could it cause ? If enough kids used the super-jerks as role
> models, as well as the attitudes displayed in other settings (movies, TV,
> as well as sports), it could contribute to a decline in societal values
> among the youth of today.
I think this is reaching a bit. The harm done by sending the message that
freedom of expression should not be allowed far outweighs any harm that could
be caused by kids dancing instead of doing random high fives as a form of
celebration.
George
|
9.2553 | "break dance somewhere else ! | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Thu Oct 20 1994 10:44 | 5 |
|
High fives, pat on the back, hand shake etc is fine.
Leave the MTV look at me one two three for the Bahama beach club.
|
9.2554 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 20 1994 11:03 | 6 |
| Nothing's wrong with it. I'm not arguing for the ban on celebrations.
I'm just explaining to you that the rule has nothing to do with the
feelings of players on the other side. It's about image. I don't
have to agree that what the NFL is doing actually does promote the
image they want, but I can still recognize that your arguments were
bogus.
|
9.2556 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 20 1994 12:17 | 11 |
| Well fine. My point is that I don't like the restrictions on celebrations as
long as they don't involve attacking the other team's players so if we agree on
that then I don't care about their reasoning.
I was of the impression that some felt that those preplaned types of
celebrations taunted other players. Someone mentioned Dallas breaking up one of
those celebrations and the rule being put in place to prevent fights. Seems
that the rule should be don't fight with players who are celebrating. Players
should go figure out what they did wrong and prevent them score next time.
George
|
9.2557 | "enought already" | AIMHI::KCUMMINGS | | Thu Oct 20 1994 12:40 | 11 |
|
I guess my point is, it's ok to celebrate but there's a fine line...
I mean high fives hand shakes, number one held in the air etc...
However, when it get to the point of naming dances (ickey shuffle, and
carrying on as such....There's just no place for it....I put it in the hot
doggin category. Let's keep it a sporting event, not a dance show.
jmho
|
9.2558 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Thu Oct 20 1994 13:38 | 9 |
|
LDUC alert!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
|
9.2559 | | 24661::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:02 | 7 |
| <<< Note 9.2556 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
> Well fine. My point is that I don't like the restrictions on celebrations as
>long as they don't involve attacking the other team's players so if we agree on
>that then I don't care about their reasoning.
Triple negative....YES!
|
9.2560 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:14 | 13 |
| By god you did it again. Another note that has nothing what ever to do with
sports.
Come on Mark, 'fess up. You have a bet that you can put note after note into
this file without ever saying anything about sports, leagues, rules, equipment,
or anything else related to Sports, right?
Prove me wrong, say anything at all about football, the rules of football,
stadiums, players, games past or present, teams, anything.
You can't do it, you'll lose your bet.
George
|
9.2562 | The small short dances are fine, but the 2 min productions arnt | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:26 | 19 |
| Mark Gastaneua(SP) and the Fun Bunch were some of the earlier one's
that started all this... Face it, there's no need to celebrate every
sack, TD etc.. I mean TD's happen all the time, its the once a game
type things that the celbrating doesnt bother me (Even the Dion Dance)
The planned and practiced type dances in the endzone should get a FINE
as well as a flag... Didnt they Allow Ickey to do his dance on the
SideLine :-) (Kind of loses a little...).
The Rule Is to STOP FIGHTS, you cant defeine each type of incident so
you have one blanket rule, I think they Under Enforce it... OF course
what does it matter if your going to allow a star (Dion) to throw
punches and not get tossed...
Oh and man I wish someone had told me sooner that I could just put an
(sp) or how about a (gr) when I have grammer errors :-)
From this point on (sp) and (gr) are assumed on all mab notes :-)
MaB
|
9.2563 | moderators | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:36 | 1 |
| Is it possible to put this discussion in the junk note?
|
9.2564 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:39 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2563 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>
-< moderators >-
> Is it possible to put this discussion in the junk note?
Are you referring to the talk about the no celebration rule or Tommy and
Mark's constant complaining about my noting style?
George
|
9.2565 | why caint we just ... | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:54 | 7 |
| Hey, there's too few of us still noting at all to worry about junk. :-(.
That there Frank Mendez has way too much time on his hands in Colorado
Springs. Skiing and basketball seasons are not quite underway and the
Donks are dropping like the thermometer. 8=).
TTom
|
9.2566 | so what else is new? | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Oct 20 1994 14:55 | 4 |
| > From this point on (sp) and (gr) are assumed on all mab notes :-)
our decoder rings handle these with ease. The problem is that we
sometimes forget them at home.
|
9.2567 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 20 1994 15:03 | 18 |
| Re <<< Note 9.2562 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
> The Rule Is to STOP FIGHTS, you cant defeine each type of incident so
> you have one blanket rule, I think they Under Enforce it... OF course
> what does it matter if your going to allow a star (Dion) to throw
> punches and not get tossed...
This is exactly right.
Rather than making rules about dancing all they have to do is crack down on
anyone who throws a punch the way they did in the past. You throw a punch, you
take a shower. Do it again, you sit out 3 games. Next time it's a season,
even if it's a big ticket name like Dion Sanders.
There will always be fights, but that type of structure seems to keep it
to a minimum.
George
|
9.2568 | What Dion hit some, $25 fine and No free Donuts for a week | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Oct 20 1994 15:15 | 12 |
| Question is do these guys still get paid if there Kicked out of a game?
And if there tossed for 3 games do they lose there pay for all 3 games?
If they get paid on a 17 or 20 Week schedule (so 1.7mil a year is 100K)
and they get tossed for 3 games could they lose 300K...
They need to fine the players more, and you cant fine them 1K,5K 10K
becuase the RICHER guys wont care as much. But fine them 5% of there
overall contract for there first offense and another 10% for there
second and these guys wont be throwing any punches...
mab
|
9.2569 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Oct 20 1994 15:24 | 8 |
| Yeah, if it becomes a problem.
Right now there don't seem to be many fights in football. Baseball has brawls
and bean ball problems, hockey still has fights, but football has been pretty
tame lately.
"Ain't broke" and all that,
George
|
9.2570 | TTom how's networks sales goin??? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Oct 20 1994 15:37 | 10 |
| Hey TTOM
Whats up, The hornets ain't even gonna get out of the gate. Your
Beloved NCState basketball team sips discretely, The UNC soccer team
just lost their winning streak, Knorr isn't around to bust on, and
you pick on the DONKS? It must be pretty sad when you have to start
cheering on the Panthers. Anyway TTOM thanks for reminding me that
this is the "Sprots Bar" and youse cain discuss anythin you want any
where.
|
9.2571 | oh and ugh | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Thu Oct 20 1994 16:21 | 10 |
| Hey Farnk I aint in Sales ;-)
You overplayed it a bit with that UNC Soccer thang, though. Re-read ACC
and I think you'll know where I stand on any misfortune concerning Chapel
Hill.
The real sad thing, however, about rootin for the Panthers is having to
go to Clemson to see the games the firsted year.
TTom
|
9.2572 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Thu Oct 20 1994 17:41 | 9 |
|
<<< Note 9.2562 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
> Oh and man I wish someone had told me sooner that I could just put an
> (sp) or how about a (gr) when I have grammer errors :-)
Not really. You are assuming you know when you make an error.
brews
|
9.2573 | ;-) | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Oct 20 1994 17:44 | 1 |
|
|
9.2574 | SOMEONE WILL KNOCK THE NEON OUT OF DEION!!! | WMOIS::FASSETT_E | Nothing beats a Bud MAN!!! | Thu Oct 20 1994 18:48 | 11 |
| I think that what pisses me most off is not the fact that Neon Deon
celebrates in the endzone after a touchtown, but the fact thta he does
the highstepping/dancing/taunting way before he gets there. If I was
one of the Falcons on the sidelines as he was doing his dance down the
sidelines last Sunday, I would have risked the fine and or suspension
and come off the sidelines and blasted Neon Deion and then beat the
living sh!t out of him. If you score a touchdown then go ahead and
celebrate all you want, but wait until you are in the endzone before
your celebration starts- or just ask LEON LETT BOUT THAT!!!!!
FAST EDDIE
|
9.2575 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 21 1994 10:39 | 4 |
| The drum major runs onto the field like that during half time, should he
be taken out back and beaten as well?
George
|
9.2576 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Happy Happy, Joy Joy | Fri Oct 21 1994 10:43 | 4 |
| Yes. Soundly.
UMDan
|
9.2577 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | AtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th. | Fri Oct 21 1994 10:51 | 6 |
| Beat the drum major with the baton!
Seriously though, Lett wasn't celebrating, he didn't get the chance
to. However he was showing off and paid the ultimate price by being
denied the TD and instead he got embarrassed world wide. He has since
more that made up for it.
|
9.2578 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 24 1994 12:30 | 16 |
| I added up the wins and losses by division again (dull paper this morning
I guess)
Subtracting total losses from total wins it went something like:
A.F.C. N.F.C.
East +2 -1
Cent -3 -1
West +3 0
------ -----
+2 -2
Again, factoring in the unbalanced schedules detracts from much of the
significance but it keeps me amused while Patty is reading her horoscope.
George
|
9.2579 | | HANNAH::ASHE | All I wanna do, is chew some gum | Mon Oct 24 1994 12:57 | 5 |
| Ok, can someone explain the rule to me on the 100+punt return
yesterday in the Ram game? I thought if the ball bounced in the end
zone on a punt, it was an automatic touchback. I guess the Saints did
too. What happened there?
|
9.2580 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 24 1994 13:01 | 5 |
|
It's not an automatic touchback. It's only down if it is
downed by either team or a fair catch is called and the
receiver elects to let the ball pass into the end zone.
It is perfectly legal to field the ball in the end zone.
|
9.2581 | OK but too many Rams | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Mon Oct 24 1994 13:03 | 13 |
| The ruling, which may or may not be the rule, is that the ball is in play
until it is either downed or goes outta bounds.
Since neither occurred, it was fair game for whoever picked it up. The
whistle hadn't blown.
The real error with the run back was not that it was illegal for the Rams
to pick up but the fack that most of the Rams' special teams was leaving
the field while the D was walking on. There's no way that only 11 Rams
were on the field. ESPN had a shot showing 2 or 3 players already coming
on the field.
TTom
|
9.2582 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Oct 24 1994 13:03 | 4 |
| Why wouldn't you be able to run back a punt in the end zone? Same
as a kick off, at your own risk.
jimbo
|
9.2583 | | HANNAH::ASHE | All I wanna do, is chew some gum | Mon Oct 24 1994 13:23 | 5 |
| I've never seen it done, that's all. I've seen balls fumbled into it
and brought out, but never seen it picked and run out on a punt.
First time it's been done in the NFL. Longest punt return before that
was 98 yds...
|
9.2584 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Oct 24 1994 13:30 | 8 |
| Similar thing happened back when I was in college. Kicking
team kicked the ball to Cle Montgomery (Wilbert's brother
and almost as good). Ball rolled to about the one yard
line. Kicking team pulled up when they saw Cle wasn't going
to run with it (they must have thought the ball went out
of bounds). Anyway, he ran it back for a 99-yard TD.
Scott
|
9.2585 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 24 1994 13:38 | 3 |
| Same thing happened in the Redskin-Dallas game a couple weeks ago. One
of the Skins ran it back 50+ yards to midfield. Nobody on Dallas
downed it.
|
9.2586 | I love it | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Mon Oct 24 1994 15:10 | 5 |
| I heard last night that it's the third time it's happened this year.
Seems so simple, how can professional players not know the rule?
Spud
|
9.2587 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 24 1994 15:51 | 14 |
|
> I heard last night that it's the third time it's happened this year.
> Seems so simple, how can professional players not know the rule?
That's the worst part. Then a couple times a year you also see guys
running away from live, hard-to-handle kickoffs as if they were punts,
as well not knowing what to do with blocked kicks as in the Leon Lett
fiasco last year. These are fairly fundamental things, but it goes
to show that given the nature of the game of football with its specific
individual assignments, players may know that playbook inside and out
but many don't know even the basic rules...
glenn
|
9.2588 | | 57042::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Oct 24 1994 16:25 | 4 |
| maybe it has to do with all thos concussions going around.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2589 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Oct 24 1994 16:26 | 1 |
| ...or not all coaches stress fundamentals.
|
9.2590 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Tue Oct 25 1994 08:58 | 2 |
| Hey, leave those return men alone. They might not know the rules, but they
sure can strut and dance and celebrate......
|
9.2591 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 25 1994 09:51 | 5 |
| It appears that the return men are the ones who know the rules but the guys
on special teams who's job is to stop them are a bit fuzzy on when the ball is
down.
George
|
9.2592 | they should be taught that in college | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Oct 25 1994 09:59 | 6 |
| Why not a 3 credit course in the rules of sport(s) to replace some of
those other guts.
Of course the "gut" quotient of any course depends on the grader.
bte
|
9.2593 | Anyone got a score from Monday Night Football | 25022::BREEN | | Tue Oct 25 1994 10:02 | 1 |
|
|
9.2594 | Eagles, by a large handful | 24661::EHS | | Tue Oct 25 1994 10:12 | 6 |
|
I believe the Eagles won 21 to 6
Poor Jack P. for the Oilers, I believe he is outa-there!
Ed
|
9.2595 | 21-6 | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Tue Oct 25 1994 10:17 | 9 |
| Philly 21, Houston 6
Garner ran one in. Cunningham passed to Barnett and Joseph. 2 Houston
TDs.
Coulda been worse. Philly was stopped once at the 1 and Cunningham threw
a_interception in the end zone.
TTom
|
9.2596 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 25 1994 10:26 | 8 |
| |Coulda been worse. Philly was stopped once at the 1 and Cunningham threw
|a_interception in the end zone.
Yabbut when the score was 14-6 Houston funbled on successive
plays on the Philly 5 yard line. They lost it the second
time.
=Bob=
|
9.2597 | | HANNAH::ASHE | All I wanna do, is chew some gum | Tue Oct 25 1994 10:27 | 5 |
| 2 Houston FG's...
How many white returners are there? Tasker doesn't do it anymore.
Is that why there's so many celebrations? (smiley goes here)
|
9.2598 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Tue Oct 25 1994 10:30 | 9 |
| George, you're sorta right.
When I wrote the note I was actually thinking of some of the instance
on kickoffs, where the return man forgets the ball is live and the kicking
team gets the TD. That's kind of the "companion" situation to the
punt returns we'd been talking about.....
'Saw
|
9.2600 | ditto | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Tue Oct 25 1994 10:45 | 17 |
| That steal by Dishman was a real factor in the game.
It looked like Houston came into the game with a plan to tackle the ball.
On the play Tommy mentioned, it was successful. Later on the score by
Barnett, Dishman again went for the ball, missed and Fred was in.
BTW, one of the thing Philly has going for it is Fred Barnett. His return
to form has really helped. Also, the Eagles running game is coming into
its own. Charlie Garner is going to get some votes for ROY. Herschel
Walker is doing everything and anything Kotite is asking him, including
some excellent blocking. James Joseph gives Cunningham another option
outta the backfield.
Bob Hunt has to be smiling this morning. His Cavs drub the Heels and the
Eagles won at the Vet.
TTom
|
9.2601 | Cunningham still has a great arm! | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Oct 25 1994 10:49 | 12 |
| | of danger. The receiving corps is solid although the o-line has
| a couple of rough spots. The defense and special teams are quite
Seems that o-line comment can be attributed to a lot of
NFL teams these days. They looked to be similar to the
Patriots, in that they totally missed some blocking
coverages when the defense did something tricky.
Cunningham did look good, I think he has learned a lot
from his early years.
=Bob=
|
9.2602 | updates | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Tue Oct 25 1994 12:40 | 25 |
| Some comings and goings:
Erik Williams, Cowboy lineman, wrecked his Mercedes Monday and could miss
the rest of the season. Williams tore ligaments in his thumb and knee,
broke a couple of ribs and had severe facial cuts. Williams was
travelling a_estimated 75 mph.
Norv Turner says that Gus Frerotte has earned another start so
multi-millionaire Heath Shuler takes another seat as the Redskins host
the Eagles.
Chicago has lost Chris Gedney for the season with a broken leg.
Art Shell is denying a_ESPN report that he made a racial slur to
Hostetler during their "discussion". Shell's anger was further fueled
when ESPN aired it withoug even checking with him.
The Colts have a mini-controversy. Jim Harbaugh was benched for Don
Majkowski in the loss to the 'Skins. Marchibroda says he'll decide by
tomorrow who'll play.
David Klingler is out for the week. Backup Don Holas will miss the nexted
2 weeks. [somedangfirstedname] Blake will make the start.
TTom
|
9.2603 | puts teams with liek records in perspective | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Tue Oct 25 1994 13:18 | 20 |
|
Not that it really means anything , but it is kinda interesting....
NFL Power Rating Week 8
Team Opp.
Team Wins Wins Pts. Opponents Defeated
1 SF 6 18 30 Rai Ram NO Det Atl TB
2 Dal 6 17 29 Pit Hou Was Ari Phi Ari
3 SD 6 16 28 Den Cin Sea Rai KC NO
4 Min 5 18 28 Det Chi Mia NYG GB
5 KC 5 18 28 NO SF Atl Den Sea
6 Phi 5 16 26 Chi GB SF Was Hou
7 Pit 5 13 23 Cle Ind Hou Cin NYG
8 Mia 5 13 23 GB NE NYJ Cin Rai
9 Cle 6 10 22 Cin Ari Ind NYJ Hou Cin
10 Chi 4 13 21 TB NYJ Buf NO
|
9.2604 | Eagles and Majkowski | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | God cares. | Tue Oct 25 1994 14:43 | 18 |
| re: .2599
Yup, you gotta like those Eagles. They've lost Jerome Brown,
Reggie White, Simmons, Joyner, Keith Jackson, Byars, and they
are doing just fine thank you. I don't know...I kind of think
with that flux in players and how they are doing, Kotite should
be strongly considered for coach of the year.
re: Majkowski
How did Majkowski do? I always hoped the best for him when he
left Green Bay. I thought he was a hard luck guy. I heard that
his arm strength was marginally to begin with for an NFL QB and
with his shoulder injury, he was basically through. I still remember
the injury. I think it was Ken Harvey of the Cardinals. He
HAMMERED Majkowski. I hope he does real well.
Tony
|
9.2605 | ?Barry Sanders number? | PROXY::OPP | | Tue Oct 25 1994 21:49 | 5 |
| Anyone know Barry Sanders of the Detroit Lions number?
My eight-year-old son ask me this and I can't recall it.
Thanks,
Greg
|
9.2606 | 20 | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Wed Oct 26 1994 08:05 | 1 |
|
|
9.2607 | | HANNAH::ASHE | All I wanna do, is chew some gum | Wed Oct 26 1994 09:55 | 2 |
| Same as Billy Sims and Lem Barney...
|
9.2608 | ex-Heel goes good | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Wed Oct 26 1994 10:05 | 3 |
| And my main main, Natrone Means.
TTom
|
9.2609 | A proxy thank you. | PROXY::OPP | | Wed Oct 26 1994 10:16 | 2 |
| Thank you, all.
|
9.2610 | | HANNAH::ASHE | All I wanna do, is chew some gum | Wed Oct 26 1994 10:18 | 4 |
| > <<< Note 9.2609 by PROXY::OPP >>>
Wow, how appropriate is that address after last night?
|
9.2611 | Da good old OPP | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Oct 26 1994 10:23 | 5 |
| | > <<< Note 9.2609 by PROXY::OPP >>>
| Wow, how appropriate is that address after last night?
Yea, some of us are working by proxy today.
|
9.2612 | 'never happened' | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Wed Oct 26 1994 10:44 | 18 |
| The controversy concerning Art Shell's alleged use of a racial slur in
his argument with Jeff Hostetler has now been denied by both of the
parties involved.
ESPN's Chris Mortensen reported that he talked to "sources" that said
that Shell refered to Hostetler as another white qb like Jay Schroeder.
Supposely a great number of expletives were included.
Shell immediately denied and challenged ESPN to come forward with the
"sources". They declined.
Now Hostetler is saying it aint true. Hoss call a press conference to eny
that Shell made the racial remark to him and said that he had never heard
Shell speak that way.
ESPN is sticking with it's version and refusing to cite their "sources".
TTom
|
9.2613 | Immortal Detroit Lion question | 25022::BREEN | Get these mutts away from me | Wed Oct 26 1994 11:29 | 13 |
| What was Doak Walker's number? I assume his number was retired. This
should be an easy question for any true Detroit Lion fan since for
example any Boston fan knows Teddy Ballgame was number 9.
Frank Way could give you Gifford's number and Huff's.
All Cleveland fans know Lou "the Toe" Groza's number better than their
own phone number.
And of course Jake could tell you Bobby Layne's number but we'll wait
till tomorrow for that one. Ernie Stautner can be substituted.
billte
|
9.2614 | more | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Wed Oct 26 1994 11:35 | 13 |
| more tidbits:
Tim Worley was placed on the reserve non-injury list. Worley missed a
team meeting and the plane to the lasted game. In a_interview, Coach
Wannstedt made it clear that there was more to this than missing a couple
of events. Worley sat out a couple of years ago after testing positive.
It's Jeff Blake who'll start for Cincy. Jeff played at East Carolina.
Craig Erickson will start for TB. Multimillionaire rookie Trent Dilfer
rides the pine.
TTOm
|
9.2615 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Wed Oct 26 1994 11:53 | 15 |
| >
> Frank Way could give you Gifford's number and Huff's.
>
Both numbers, btw, are NOT retired by the Giants...
Gifford was #16, and Sam Huff was #70....
The league has approached the Packers and the Giants in the past
and asked them not to retire too many more numbers. I'm not sure
if that's the case with Detroit and Chicago also.....
'Saw
|
9.2616 | Other teams practice sacrilegious paganism... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 26 1994 12:04 | 20 |
|
> The league has approached the Packers and the Giants in the past
> and asked them not to retire too many more numbers. I'm not sure
> if that's the case with Detroit and Chicago also.....
As far as I know Chicago has retired _no_ numbers, until this week,
that is. I think it's at this week's game that they're finally going
to give Sayers' 40 and Butkus' 51 the honors (I'd guess that Payton's
will follow at some point). Now why they've let mere mortals run
around on the field with these numbers all these years is anybody's
guess.
As I understand it the Steelers do not offically retire numbers,
either. I think they've held some of them back from use (12, 58, 59,
75) but others have re-circulated (82, 88). Who was it that refused to
wear Harris' 32 which was finally offered up? It was Bam Morris just
this year, right?
glenn
|
9.2617 | others | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Wed Oct 26 1994 12:11 | 13 |
| Glenn,
I think that Chicago has a bunch of other numbers retired. ESPN had a
chart with the pro teams with the most retired numbers and Chicago had
more retired than any one else in the NFL.
Sorry, but I don't know who they are, except, as you mentioned, for
Sayers and Butkus. For 51, Chicago had been playing/using it but stopped.
FWIW, Boston Celtics had more retired numbers than any other pro
franchise.
TTom
|
9.2619 | | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Wed Oct 26 1994 14:16 | 10 |
| If I can round up this morning's Chicago Sun-Times, I'll list all the
previous Bears jersey's retired. There had to be about ten that have
been done already. I'll have to double-check, but I thought it also
mentioned that Chicago has had the most retired overall.
Ditka hasn't yet. The sportsnut next to me was just saying yesterday
that he wished they would retire his as well.
Spud
|
9.2620 | update | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Wed Oct 26 1994 14:18 | 5 |
| It was in yesterday's paper. TSN (the sports nut) was telling me
they've retired 13 Bear jerseys and it is the most in the NFL.
Spud
|
9.2622 | | HANNAH::ASHE | All I wanna do, is chew some gum | Wed Oct 26 1994 14:32 | 1 |
| Payton...
|
9.2623 | Spudster, can you get the answer? | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Oct 26 1994 14:33 | 23 |
|
| OK, so Ditka, Butkus and Sayers haven't had their numbers retired.
| Anyone care to hazard a guess on who has?
That's a tough one. Truely a guess:
1. Bronko Nagurski (sp?)
2. Red Grange
3. Sid Luckman
4. Bill George
5. George Halas (yes, he played)
6. Abe Gibron (sp?)
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13. Doug Flutie (that one's for JD)
That's all I can think of.
=Bob=
|
9.2624 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Oct 26 1994 14:34 | 1 |
| Brian Piccolo
|
9.2625 | Williams drunk, Majik Man starts | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Wed Oct 26 1994 14:54 | 8 |
| and some more...
Erik Williams was indeed under the influence prior to his wreck.
And the Colts are gonna start the Majik Man, sitting Harbaugh on the
pine.
TTom
|
9.2626 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:15 | 1 |
| Giant have retired ten.
|
9.2627 | no #'s left | GENRAL::WADE | FearTheGovernmentWhoFearsYourGuns | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:17 | 5 |
|
I think retiring jersies is silly. Cut to the year 2050. You'll
have a bunch of guys running around with jersey 1A, 1B, 1C, etc...
Claybone
|
9.2628 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:22 | 7 |
| I think it's cool if done appropriately.... I can see the Red Sox
retiring Ted Williams number, because who else could wear #9?
Course with the Sox you have to be in the HoF to have your number retired...
'saw
|
9.2629 | | ROCK::HUBER | Indians in '94 | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:28 | 9 |
|
> I think retiring jersies is silly. Cut to the year 2050. You'll
> have a bunch of guys running around with jersey 1A, 1B, 1C, etc...
The NFL agrees with you; the Browns would love to retire Ozzie
Newsome's number, and probably Clay Matthew's as well, but the NFL
is strongly discouraging the retirement of any numbers.
Joe
|
9.2630 | 33,2,1 next? | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:31 | 3 |
| I guess the Hornets will join the Celtics in retiring 00.
TTom
|
9.2631 | 13 total | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:43 | 24 |
| Okay. Here they are:
Bronko Nagurski 3
George MacAfee 5
George Halas 7
Gilmore 28
Walter Payton 34
Brian Piccolo 41
Sid Luckman 42
Bill Ewitt 56
Bill George 61
Bill Turner 66
Red Grange 77
and Monday night:
Gayle Sayers 40
Dick Butkess 51
HTH,
Spud
|
9.2632 | oops | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:44 | 4 |
| That should be "Bulldog" Turner.
Spud
|
9.2634 | big todo about what? | 25022::BREEN | Get these mutts away from me | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:55 | 6 |
| well a lot of those guys were from the monsters of the midway but I
only count two championships in 40 years.
And if you do Hampton don't you have to do Dent?
I will agree that Jim McMahon number can be reused indefinitely.
|
9.2636 | Hampton does deserve it | 25022::BREEN | Get these mutts away from me | Wed Oct 26 1994 16:37 | 4 |
| Well it seemed like they were to together for the "glory" years.
but considering the condition of Hampton's knees and body I'd go with
the retirement to reward his sacrifice.
|
9.2637 | Da Bears (got carried away) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 26 1994 16:38 | 20 |
|
I think that uniform number retirement should be reserved for those
covered by the loosely-defined term "immortal". That would include
Butkus, but not someone like Hampton. Now that I've seen the way the
Bears have thrown around the retired numbers, I now recall something
about Butkus being held off due to some kind of a long-running feud
with Halas and the Bears, which is a pretty stupid reason on the
Bears' part (they needn't have even held a ceremony to reserve the
number, if the dispute was that important). With all due respect,
someone got a bit carried away after the Brian Piccolo tragedy. They
could probably could have cut that list in half by leaving it at
Nagurski, Luckman, Butkus, Payton, and maybe Sayers, Bill George and
Bulldog Turner (I'll defer to Billte on those last two ;-). Red
Grange didn't even play that long in the NFL-- that must have been a
concession to the Illini contingent. Willie Galimore? I don't think
so. Retire an old houndstooth cap-- not The Bear's, though-- or
something like that for Halas.
glenn
|
9.2638 | I'd have eight | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Oct 26 1994 17:05 | 20 |
| If I were choosing from that list:
Bronko Nagurski Yup
George MacAfee Nope
George Halas Yup
Willie Gilamore Nope (but he IS in the HOF, I think)
Walter Payton Yup
Brian Piccolo Nope
Sid Luckman Yup
Bill Ewitt Nope
Bill George Nope
Clyde Turner Yup
Red Grange Yup (contribution to the game)
and Monday night:
Gayle Sayers Yup
Dick Butkess Yup
|
9.2639 | When men were men | 25022::BREEN | Get these mutts away from me | Wed Oct 26 1994 17:06 | 15 |
| Bulldog is before my time. Bill George was one of three nfc-west
middle linebackers who had their adherents as nfl best (most serious
observers didn't rank Huff at the top, skill wise).
I'm trying to recall the Defensive End on that squad who I believe just
made hof. The Bears defense from 55-70 was considered nfl's best.
One thing that Bears lacked was a quarterback and the best of the lot
during the 60s was probably BC's Jack Concannon who had injury
problems.
Grange was to the nfl as Joe Willie Namath was to AFL; the guy who gave
it credibility. In those days the top college teams were considered
superior to the pro teams, an opinion that Army's Red Blaik held right
up to 1960.
|
9.2640 | | HANNAH::ASHE | All I wanna do, is chew some gum | Wed Oct 26 1994 17:18 | 2 |
| I could see Piccolo... that was a very emotional time for them...
|
9.2641 | Got the same problem, billte... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 26 1994 17:36 | 9 |
|
> I'm trying to recall the Defensive End on that squad who I believe just
> made hof. The Bears defense from 55-70 was considered nfl's best.
I think this is the guy who very recently was defensive line
coach for the Patriots... now what the hell was his name?
glenn
|
9.2642 | Giants retired numbers | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Thu Oct 27 1994 09:02 | 26 |
| The Giants have retired the following numbers:
1 - Ray Flaherty
7 - Mel Hein
14 - YA Tittle
32 - Al Blozis (killed in WWII)
40 - Joe Morrison
42 - Charlie Conerly
50 - Ken Strong
56 - Lawrence Taylor
11 will be retired soon.
Al Blozis got retired after playing two seasons. They said he was one of
the greatest linemen they'd ever seen. He was huge (like 6'6") and had
a problem getting into the service, but finally got into the Army.
He went out one day to find a missing patrol and never came back.
There was another Giant player (forget what his name was) who was killed
in Okinawa. I don't know all the details but he was awarded the Congressional
Medal of Honor for his actions.
|
9.2643 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Thu Oct 27 1994 09:19 | 9 |
| |14 - YA Tittle
This probably a question for Billte, since I know
'Saw is my age, so doesn't really remember:
How many years did Tittle play in NY, and how many in
SF? Where did he have his best years?
=Bob=
|
9.2644 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Thu Oct 27 1994 09:21 | 14 |
| >This probably a question for Billte, since I know
>'Saw is my age, so doesn't really remember:
>
>How many years did Tittle play in NY, and how many in
>SF? Where did he have his best years?
Actually, that subject was broached on WFAN at one point.
I don't have my football encyclopedia here, but I know that YA had
a couple of good years in NY, and I know he took them to the championship
game at least once.
'Saw
|
9.2646 | | 25151::BREEN | | Thu Oct 27 1994 11:12 | 11 |
| Tittle came to the Giants late in his career and I'd bet in his mid 30s.
I believe he played in both the Green Bay title games but was ineffective
in both; Connerly relieved him in the second one. He was outstanding during the
regular season and I'd guess his years were 60-65.
He was part of a three quarterback experiment with 49ers and never was recognized
there as a great quarterback though I'm sure he had the skills but not the team
that the Giants had. John Brodie made him expendable.
Myself, I was always a Connerly man, just as I was a Grogan man with Pat's and
never saw the need for Eason.
|
9.2647 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 27 1994 11:35 | 13 |
|
>> I'm trying to recall the Defensive End on that squad who I believe just
>> made hof. The Bears defense from 55-70 was considered nfl's best.
>
> I think this is the guy who very recently was defensive line
> coach for the Patriots... now what the hell was his name?
Okay, the guy I was thinking of is Stan Jones, but maybe the guy you
were thinking of is Doug Atkins. Both were HOF DEs for the Bears in
that time period. Atkins was the better player of the two, certainly...
glenn
|
9.2648 | WB Ratings | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Thu Oct 27 1994 11:35 | 44 |
| The following are the USA Today/Gordon Forbes ratings for NFL QBs.
The ranges are
90-100 franchise
80-89 solid, productive starters
70-79 starters lacking consistency or experience
60-69 need work
Rank Rating
1. Troy Aikman 98.0
2. Steve Young 96.0
3. Dan Marino 95.0
4. John Elway 92.5
5. Joe Montana 91.0
6. Drew Bledsoe 90.0
7. Jim E.Kelly 89.0
8. Randall Cunningham 87.0
9. Warren Moon 86.5
10. Jeff George 86.0
11. Stan Humphries 85.5
12. Rick Mirer 84.0
13. Jeff Hostetler 83.5
14. Erik Kramer 83.0
15. Brett Favre 82.0
16. Jim Everett 81.5
17. Boomer Esiason 81.0
18. Neil O'Donnell 80.5
19. Craig Erickson 80.0
20. Scott Mitchell 78.0
21. Jim Harbaugh 77.0
22. Chris Miller 74.0
23. John Friesz 71.5
24. Vinny Testaverde 71.0
25. Cody Carlson 70.5
26. Steve Walsh 68.0
27. Dave Brown 66.5
28. Steve Beuerlein 65.0
29. David Klingler 64.0
30. Heath Shuler 62.0
31. Bucky Richardson 61.5
The rest are unrated.
TTom
|
9.2649 | yep, Doug Atkins, a brute of a man | 25151::BREEN | | Thu Oct 27 1994 11:39 | 0 |
9.2650 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Thu Oct 27 1994 11:43 | 6 |
|
Aikman #1??? Give me freakin break. Emmitt carries that man!!!!
Chap
|
9.2651 | where's that Chap's roster? | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Thu Oct 27 1994 11:48 | 9 |
| Let's see, now...
The Chap's have #5 Montana and #7 Kelly.
The Doovers have #2 Young and #3 Marino.
I can see why you're crying ;-).
TTom
|
9.2652 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Thu Oct 27 1994 11:52 | 6 |
|
2 words for ya Ttom..
Steve Christie
|
9.2653 | 6-2 vs 4-4 | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Thu Oct 27 1994 11:53 | 0 |
9.2654 | Lucky vs UnluckyAllen's 2 pt conversion crushed me | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Thu Oct 27 1994 12:04 | 1 |
|
|
9.2655 | it had to be said | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Thu Oct 27 1994 12:34 | 5 |
|
all you got to do is look at ole Inties Elway at #4 to know this rating
system is significantly FLAWED!!!!!!!!
mike
|
9.2656 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Thu Oct 27 1994 12:36 | 1 |
| Doug Atkins was a STUD.
|
9.2657 | go broncos | BSS::MARLAND | | Thu Oct 27 1994 12:49 | 2 |
| all you people like to knock Elway but every team in the league
sure is afraid of him.
|
9.2658 | That QB rating was a JOKE | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Oct 27 1994 12:55 | 14 |
| Saying Cunningham and Moon are not FRANCHISE QB's is a joke...
Look at Houston without him, and look at minny with him, what else
is needed to prove that one.
Same with Cunningham, how does his team fare without him compared to
when he's in there.
Funny in the NFC which is the superior league Moon and Cunningham are
leading the #3 and #4 teams in the NFC... Without these 2 QB's neither
of those teams are legitimate contenders (I still feel both of those
teams are capable of upsetting Dallas or San Fran, more so at home).
mab
|
9.2659 | maybe years ago but not any more | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Thu Oct 27 1994 12:59 | 11 |
|
> all you people like to knock Elway but every team in the league
> sure is afraid of him.
why?
He's got more weapons than maybe 2 or 3 other QB's in the league and what
has done with them? Won a whole 2 games. WHOOPIE!!!!!!!!
mike
|
9.2661 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Thu Oct 27 1994 13:04 | 9 |
| >Look at Houston without him, and look at minny with him, what else
>is needed to prove that one.
Who let Dr 00:00 into mab's account?
billl
|
9.2662 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | What a terrible year 1918 | Thu Oct 27 1994 13:50 | 6 |
|
Raiders Aren't afraid of BuckY :-)
Chap
|
9.2663 | lost a bit | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Thu Oct 27 1994 13:57 | 5 |
| I, for one, feel that Elway has lost a little this year.
It may be a bad offensive line but he really hasn't looked all that good.
TTom
|
9.2664 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Thu Oct 27 1994 14:20 | 3 |
| Moon and Cunningham could be franchise QBs under some definitions, but
I can tell you one thing -- when it comes to the playoffs, watch
them gag on the ol' Chicken Bone!
|
9.2665 | Moon/Cunningham are as good or better then ALL of these QB's | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Oct 27 1994 14:25 | 4 |
| That can be said for Young, ALL/ANY NFC Central QB's, Elway, Kelly,
Marino etc, etc, etc...
MaB
|
9.2667 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Thu Oct 27 1994 15:28 | 23 |
| > Yeah. It's Warren's fault that the Oilers took a 30+
> point lead into halftime against the Bills and managed
> to lose. Or was that Reeves' fault I'm not sure. And
> exactly which game did Randall choke during? The fog
> game?
Hey, facks is facks.
Worn Moon has never lead an NFL team anywhere but home early.
And Randall is the same way.
If you don't believe me, listen to all the analysts who talk about
Randall and Worn not being able to win the big one.
If I remember right, Reeves was still in Denver when Worn's 'mates
blew that game (was it two years ago or three, I can't remember, but I'm
thinking three) in which case we had Ray Handley.
If it was Ray Handley, you can be damn sure it was his fault -- EVERYTHING
was his fault 8^)
|
9.2669 | Kelly was out | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Thu Oct 27 1994 15:52 | 6 |
| Concerning the Buffalo-Houston playoff game, one point not being made is
that Buffalo came back with Kelly outta the game.
Hail, if'n Kelly plays the Oilers may have won the game.
TTom
|
9.2670 | | MKFSA::LONG | Strive for five! | Thu Oct 27 1994 15:56 | 8 |
| I get Tommy's point about Worn (I like that) not being responible for
the D's short comings in the second half. However, you also have to
wonder about a team who can put 30+ points on the board in the first
half then zip in the second. Especially when the other team starts
closing the gap.
billl
|
9.2671 | Just passing through, causing some trouble... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 27 1994 16:26 | 10 |
|
> I'd like to hear some specifics on exactly when Randall "choked"
> in a playoff game. He wasn't that polished a qb until the last
> three years or so but "choked"?
Maybe this is sort of like how Yaz always used to "choke"... ;-)
glenn
|
9.2673 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 27 1994 16:42 | 8 |
|
> You mean with a weak pop up to end the series?
Yup, kinda like that brutal INT Moon tossed up at the end of the
Buffalo game...
glenn
|
9.2675 | Now that you've come full circle on the matter of putting up 35... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 27 1994 17:08 | 18 |
|
> Meanwhile yesterday's Globe contained a quote by coach Bill
> about how badly turnovers particularly those caused by the in-
> experience at quarterback have hurt the team. Apparently, Bill
> has reversed position on his 'complete qb' stance. Ha!
Don't obfuscate, Tommy. Seems to me that a very few mistakes made
by a certain QB set you off pretty good after a couple games where
"you score 35 points you ought to win" wasn't cutting any mustard
at all with you... Not that there's anything particularly funny
about it, seeing that no one expected there would be no rough spots
along the way (there's hardly a contradiction). I suspect that
Parcells knows full well the downside to having absolutely no
running game, but as a coach it's still his job to seek perfection
from everyone, every week, regardless.
glenn
|
9.2676 | I'll split the difference on this one... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 27 1994 17:19 | 10 |
|
BTW, I don't think Warren Moon is a "choker". On the contrary, he's
a damn good QB who could very well be the last-chance savior of the
Minnesota regime. Cunningham, on the other hand, has more to prove.
For all his talents, I think he has had struggles in the playoffs where
he did have control over the outcome of the game and didn't get it
done.
glenn
|
9.2677 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Ain't no cure for the overseed blues | Thu Oct 27 1994 20:58 | 7 |
| > <<< Note 9.2657 by BSS::MARLAND >>>
> -< go broncos >-
> all you people like to knock Elway but every team in the league
> sure is afraid of him.
You mean afraid to let him play on their team, right?
|
9.2678 | #'s dont lie, there Individual contrabutions are HUGE | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 28 1994 09:01 | 12 |
| SO Moon and Cunningham are both chokers becuase they couldnt lead
there teams thru the BIG GAMES.
So by just using that criteria every starting QB in the league today
is a choker except who... Hoss, Montana and Aikman. I think Im missing
one more but arnt these the only 3 starting QB's in the league that
were able to lead there team thru the BIG GAMES. SO the rest are
all chockers...
Ya Id take Hoss and Montana over Moon, Randall, Elway etc...
MaB
|
9.2679 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Fri Oct 28 1994 09:02 | 20 |
| I never said that Worn was TOO BLAM for the Buffalo loss.
First off, Worn wasn't playing both ways. But neither was he helping the
cause by putting more points on the board.
Secondly, Buffalo is but one game, and I'm not talking about just one game.
Worn was in Houston for a long time, and never brought them to the promised
land.
Crandall Runningham on the other hand, as Glenn says, has a lot to prove.
He's always been a little too quick to run, never really totally "fitted"
into the system, and, on the whole, doesn't have what it takes IMO to
lead the Eagles anywhere....
To me, Crandall is kind of like Farve, but at a higher level -- lots o'
press, but damn little results....
'Saw
|
9.2680 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Fri Oct 28 1994 09:12 | 43 |
| > -< #'s dont lie, there Individual contrabutions are HUGE >-
What would you rather have on the Pats, Mab? Someone who has HUGE
individual numbers, or someone who can win you a championship?
How would you have liked it if Mikey "I Still Think I Can Play Baseball"
Jordan had HUGE individual stats, but no champeenship rings?
>
> SO Moon and Cunningham are both chokers becuase they couldnt lead
> there teams thru the BIG GAMES.
>
No, I didn't say that. Read my lips.
Moon and Cunningham have not lead their teams to the promised land.
According to most analysts, they're still lacking something.
Moon has choked in some important games over the years, and Randall
seems to disappear in the playoffs. That's a fact, go back and
review the tapes.
> So by just using that criteria every starting QB in the league today
> is a choker except who... Hoss, Montana and Aikman. I think Im missing
> one more but arnt these the only 3 starting QB's in the league that
> were able to lead there team thru the BIG GAMES. SO the rest are
> all chockers...
>
And you write software? Man, with logic like that it's a wonder anything
you write works......8^)
Oh yeah, what's a chocker? Is that the guy who puts the chock under the
wheel of the airliner? 8^)
'Saw
|
9.2681 | Vikes should win 5 of their next 6 games | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Fri Oct 28 1994 09:35 | 9 |
| Hey 'Saw!
One thing to consider, tho, is that Moon never had the defense in
Houston he now has in Minnesota. I really feel he was the missing
piece in the Vikings plan. We'll see, but I like our chances to go a
long way this year.
Spud
|
9.2682 | Moon and Randall are 2 of the top 5 in the game today | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 28 1994 09:55 | 32 |
| Well CAM you cant compare Basketball to Football, the same 5 guys have
to play offense and defense so they control there own fate regardless.
Also no special teams :-)
What Im trying to point out is that Moon and Randall are both great
QB's. THATS QB's there not great coaches, Running Backs, WR's, Def
or Kickers. Steve Young would be in the same catagory as the previous
2 QB's (Moon/Randall) but SF had the team that could go to and win the
superbowl and changed young for Montana and couldnt get the job done.
So give Moon/Randall SF's Defense, Rice, Watters, Jones etc and see if
they could get to the BIG DANCE.... What stopped Houston and Philly
from getting to the Superbowl was not there QB's, they didnt have the
rest of what was needed. In SF on the other hand, they WENT to and ONE
the SB then improved the team but went with Young Over Montana....and
havnt gone anywhere since...
Plus look at Houston/Philly without Moon/Randall the team goes down
think back to what SF was with Montana over Young...
Young has had all the pieces and still couldnt get the job done, Moon
and Randall have come just as close without the comparable teams around
them....
Will be intresting to see the playoffs in the NFC, Aikman, Moon,
Randall and Young should all be there, obviosly SF and DALLAS have
the better all around teams but I think Moon or Randall will help
drive there team past one of SF or DALLAS... Hopefully both.
I dont Philly's D can win it for them but Minny's D could...
mab
|
9.2685 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | AtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th. | Fri Oct 28 1994 13:27 | 1 |
| What defense?
|
9.2686 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Fri Oct 28 1994 13:48 | 32 |
| |
| >> Moon and Cunningham have not lead their teams to the promised land.
| >> According to most analysts, they're still lacking something.
|
| >> Moon has choked in some important games over the years, and Randall
| >> seems to disappear in the playoffs. That's a fact, go back and
| >> review the tapes.
|
| I love these vague assertions that aren't backed up by any factual
| data whatsoever. "According to most analysts". What analysts? Names
| please. "Lacking something"? Couldn't be more vague. "Moon has
| choked in some important games" and "Randall seems to disappear in
| the playoffs". Which games?
Do me.
Watch ESPN, watch Fox. Listen to the radio shows. Watch TNT,
I don't have to back up anything with times and dates and references. I'm
not writing a research paper or a newspaper article here. I'm stating
opinions, based on what I've heard by watching football over the past
few years.
If you need answers to your questions, and it doesn't really matter what
I say because you're just being contrary as usual, you can read
Randall's playoff games as "all of them" and Worn's important games as
"anyone which would advance Houston in the playoffs".
Next time clue me in if you want references and I'll start watching
the games with a pad, a pencil and a chronometer.....
|
9.2688 | SF/DAL/PHI/MIN should not lose this weekend :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 28 1994 15:35 | 22 |
| **********************
I don't have to back up anything with times and dates and references.
I'm
not writing a research paper or a newspaper article here. I'm stating
opinions, based on what I've heard by watching football over the past
few years.
***********
Oh ya Saw you can type anything and dont need proof to back it up but
you want me to submit all my notes LOOKING like research papers or
newspaper articles... :-)
Any QB that does not LEAD his team to a SUPERBOWL WIN will always be
questioned regardless of his stats or accomplishments. Also MOST OR
ALL NFL FOOTBALL fans will never recognize any accomplishments in
the Pop-Warner Level of CFL, USFL or WORLD LEAGUE....
These are the FACTS and if Michael Jordan never won a championship
people would have always question his talant, and weather he was a
team player or just padding his stats night in and night out...
mab
|
9.2689 | I'm just going on what I'm told... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 28 1994 15:46 | 44 |
|
>> Don't obfuscate, Tommy.
>
> Please. Are you going to tell me that you threw Carl Yazstremski
> into the discussion in order to clarify things?
Actually, yes. It was at least related to the topic at hand, "winning
da big one" (as opposed to the merits of a second-year QB), and was as
much for 'Saw's benefit as yours, because I know 'Saw's position on
Yaz, and it ain't the totally irrelevant "which would you rather have,
stats or a championship" (because that choice is never available) or
"never led them to the promised land", nothing like that. But as for
Moon, yes, he has made come crucial mistakes in big games, including
a whopper at the end of the Buffalo game. And he was even a veteran
at the time. No huge deal, as I agree that he's not a "choker", but
it's still a fact.
> It was even pointed out that we had a winning record! Of course we were a
> whopping 3-2 (ticker tape parade!)
But it should have been 5-0 (now 5-2), mostly on Bledsoe's arm.
I'm going by an authority even higher than Parcells', that of
Tommy Brydie. "You score 35 points, you should win. And if you
don't it ain't the quarterback's fault."-- Tommy Brydie. It
don't get much more authoritative than that.
> Nice try but no cigar. Drew's turnovers have been very costly and the
> coach flat out said so. The lack of a running game can't be blamed
> for everything especially the inabality to handle the snap from center,
> throwing the ball into traffic and the inability to recognize the
> blitz.
I agree with the first one; the last two are related to the lack of a
running game. But it could just as easily be said (by Parcells, by
anyone) that Drew's touchdowns have been very valuable, because there
hasn't been any other offense than the passing game. All depends on
your expectations. Like I said, for a coach it's healthy to strive for
perfection. As a supposed Pats' fan I seriously wonder about your
negativity around Bledsoe, though. It's one thing to point out
mistakes but you seem to take great glee in them, especially when to
date they've been outnumbered by the positives...
glenn
|
9.2690 | and that from now on you'll spell it talent--thanks | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Fri Oct 28 1994 15:55 | 8 |
|
Mab, please help me out here. I'm the last one to point out spelling errors,
grammar, fat finger typing etc but you continually use the word the talent
and spell it as talant. Please tell me you really know that talent is
spelled talent and not talant and that you're just trying to bust the
spelling and grammar police's balls...........
mike
|
9.2692 | Back to the original; I still don't understand the fuss... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 28 1994 16:28 | 19 |
|
> Drew Bledose in his second year, playing for a losing team is
> a franchise QB and Jim Kelly, Warren Moon and Randall Cunningham
> aren't. These QB ratings and Jeff Sagarin's power ratings are
> all the proof you need that you can use stats to backup any argu-
> ment that you choose.
By the way, getting back to the comment that started this, what's so
outrageous about this comparison (especially when you consider the four
QBs are separated by a grand total of 3.5 "points", whatever those
are)? I question the use of the word "franchise" in a single-season
rating system, but ranking system aside is there any doubt but that
Drew Bledsoe is almost the definition of a "franchise QB" and that each
of the teams employing the other QBs above wouldn't hesitate one minute
in swapping each straight up for Bledsoe, showing what he already has
at 22 years of age?
glenn
|
9.2693 | Drew is da man | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 28 1994 16:38 | 29 |
| -1..
Id have a hard time beleiving that 90% of the teams in the league
would trade straight up for bledsoe with there starting QB ?
The only teams that may not consider it (THIS YEAR) would be the
one's that feel thay have a legit shot at winning the SB this year.
(DAL, Philly, Minny, SF, KC, MIA, BUF, SD).
But a few of those teams (Minny, KC, MIA, BUF, SD) Would be stupid
not too. Aikman is still young, randall has a few good years but the
other teams all have old QB's (minny, KC, mia, buf) or avg qb's (SD)
or just CHOKE ARTIST (SF).
Bledsoe is the BEST YOUNG QB in the game today and at this point or
the season and his career looks to be the best QB in the game. Id say
every team in the league would benefit by having drew bledsoe on there
team over the next 2-5 seasons (He would need a year to grow into any
teams systems).
Bledsoe leads the league in attempts, completions, yards, and is 2nd in
TD's to Marino. This is not 1 game but go back to the later half of
last season and the 1st half of this season and he may just be the top
QB in the game. Yes he still makes alot of 22 year old 2nd year qb
mistakes (INT's etc) but thats youth and inexperience...
over 2300 yrds and 14tds in 7 games (Avg of 310yrds and 2 tds per game)
not too shabbby......
mab
|
9.2694 | a team to wreckon with ;*) | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Fri Oct 28 1994 16:39 | 21 |
| I think the Vikes have what they need to get it done this year. In the
recent past, they've had bukoo Pro Bowlers and died early in the
playoffs. Now they have a few name players and a solid team. Moon is
the type of QB they've been missing since two-minute Tommy Kramer.
When they've made the playoffs over the last ten years or so, they've
upset a few people, but were never regarded as legitimate to reach the
Overhyped Bowl. This year I would think they have a solid shot at
getting a first round bye and home field for one or two games through
the NFC Championship. Whether this happens and they get it done
remains to be seen, but at least the attitude with us (Vikes fans) is
that this isn't a 9 or 10 win barely-make-it-into-the-playoffs team.
This team should win 11 and possibly 12 games and reach the next level.
There's a whole new attitude in watching games that they're never out
of it with Moon. It's also nice to see them not sitting on leads and
playing too conservatively. They have more of the killer instinct.
They'd better blow Tampa Bay away too... or else. :*O
Spud
|
9.2695 | Go Vikes.. But let Rhett have a big game :-) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Fri Oct 28 1994 16:43 | 10 |
| 11 or 12 wins are very reachable for minny, but there HFA may ride
on the last game of the season. San Fransisco, at Minny in week17.
All minny has to do is win the games they should win
(TB, NO, Pats, NYJ, TB) Then Maybe Split the game they can win
(Chi, Det, Buf, SF) and they win 12 :-)
Im hoping Minny or Philly can someone get the #1 seed in the NFC
mab
|
9.2697 | Not better than dozen other QBs + Moon/Cunn? Name 'em... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 28 1994 17:40 | 27 |
|
> I doubt that that rating takes into account upside potential. At this
> point in his career Drew is *not* a better QB than Randall or Warren
> and anyone of a dozen QBs could have this team at 3-4. Plug Drew into
> Philly or Minny and those teams probably aren't 5-2.
I respectfully have to ask what this superhuman QB looks like
who is able to overcome no running game all season long, spotty
wide receivers and two horrendous defensive efforts to have the
Patriots at 4-3 or better. I'd also strongly disagree that
Bledsoe is only in the middle of the pack behind or even with
half the league's QBs, and say that it's far more credible that
there are a dozen or more starting QBs out there who'd have this
team and its problems at 2-5, or worse.
As I said before, I'll grant you Moon's credentials, but over his
career (if not through the first part of this season), Cunningham has
far too often been the victim of exactly the kind of mistakes that you
criticize Bledsoe for. In the later years (before the injuries) he
didn't have inexperience as an excuse, either. Maybe he has turned it
around this year, but the "guile and leadership" part has not been
previously evident, at least not consistently and definitely not in
the three playoff starts (three lackluster performances, three losses)
in his career.
glenn
|
9.2698 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Mon Oct 31 1994 08:53 | 17 |
| I've watched a lot of football too, and football shows on ESPN (Schaap Talk,
stuff like that).
The subject of Randall's inability to win the big games has come up many times.
I can't give you exact dates and times or channels and on-air personalities,
but I know what I've heard. If that's not good enough for you Tommy, I'm
sorry. Randall's been in more playoff games than just the fog game...
I know one thing -- Randall Cunningham has ALWAYS been a Giant killer when
he's been healthy.
Mab, I don't object to what you say so much. It's just that I like to
try and read your notes without a decoder ring.....
'Saw
|
9.2700 | Shut it down, get back to basics, if it fails or not... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 31 1994 10:59 | 33 |
|
> Its too bad that you can't point out that Drew has flaws without
> having your credentials as a Patriots fan questioned. I've been
> a Pats fan all my life. I've even become a Drew fan even though
> he wasn't the guy I wanted them to draft. He's obviously a budding
> superstar and his talent and attitude have won me over much as Marshall
> Faulk is doing.
This is all very reasonable, and I don't disagree with it even
slightly. You got the (desired, I expect) reaction out of me with
the stuff about wondering if Bledsoe has a ten-cent head, etc., which
I still don't think is the case. Currently, for a second-year QB,
there could not be a more perfect recipe for failure than the situation
that exists with the Pats' running game, where Bledsoe must throw 2 of
every 3 downs. I still think that Parcells should return some to what
I believe he was up to in the Jets' game, where at least for a while he
was trying to run the ball more with Blair Thomas even if it wasn't
very efficient and might have increased his chances of losing that
particular game. Basically, any realistic playoff chances are over.
Take some of the pressure off, concentrate on the running game during
the week and insist on using it on the weekend, even if it takes a
few weeks to see progress. There may even be an immediate upside in
that that'll keep Bledsoe from being killed (that wasn't a real
problem yesterday, though). There _has_ to be a running game for
any longterm upside.
Glad to hear you're finally coming around on Faulk, though. That
winning TD run of his yesterday was sheer beauty. I look forward to
seeing him against the Pats twice in the upcoming months...
glenn
|
9.2702 | | 30008::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Mon Oct 31 1994 12:05 | 4 |
| I think Bledsoe is the perfect extension of his coach. They're
both bonehaids!
/Don
|
9.2703 | No letdown, looking for HFA come playoff time | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:01 | 12 |
| Gotta like the way the Vikes put Tampa Bay away early yesterday. Much
like the Bear game, they could've named their score from halftime on.
All four RB's got some PT, with Allen coming back with another long run
and 100+ yards.
Vikes D continues to be an offensive weapon. Anthony Parker picked
another one off for a TD and has scored in three straight games now.
Anyone know the record for a defensive player?
Spud
|
9.2704 | Minnesota/Green Bay | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | God cares. | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:02 | 15 |
| re: .2694
I have to ask...what do you think of the Pack? The Packer's
defense has held Minnesota's offense to 9 points in TWO games!!
The loss at Minnesota was a real backbreaker.
By the way, Moon executed a really nice drive at the end of
regulation. Beautiful drive. I was really impressed with him.
I would trade Favre for Bledsoe in a heartbeat.
If Green Bay loses to the Bears, they will be the best team to not
make the playoffs!
Tony
|
9.2705 | | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:03 | 6 |
| I meant to mention that the Vikes D has now scored 5 TD's this year and
17 since Denny has taken over in '92. Far and away ahead of the second
best since that time.
Spud
|
9.2706 | What's the deal here? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:11 | 16 |
|
> I like the way that you gloss over the fact that you took my earlier
> statements about a dozen other quarterbacks completely out of context.
I don't know why you're always complaining about being taken out of
context. You said "at this point in his career Drew is *not* a better
QB than Randall or Warren and anyone of a dozen QBs could have this
team at 3-4". Since there are 28 teams in the league, not being any
better than about 14 starting QBs sounds like middle of the pack to me.
You've made a reasonable argument and you may very well be right (I
think he's a little bit better than that, and would be having more
success if allowed to pick his spots) but I fail to see how I
misconstrued your point.
glenn
|
9.2707 | NFC Central | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Mon Oct 31 1994 13:20 | 25 |
| Re: Tony
The Pack is definately underachieving to this point. I'm not sure what
it is they're missing, but it might be the QB. As I mentioned with the
Vikes, I think Moon has made a big difference with the teams
performance and attitude. Last year I don't see this team winning
either the Miami game or last GB game that Warren pulled out with
clutch performances.
The Pack always seems to play the Vikes tough no matter what the
records are. A lot of that has to do with the rivalry over the years.
But our thinking was, "leave Favre in there, because sooner or later he
will screw up and throw that INT or make some other bonehead play." I
don't know if he's just not progressing or whether he just won't get
much better to lead them anywhere of significance.
I like the Pack's chances tonight. I keep telling these Bears fans
that they aren't going anywhere with Kramer either. Much of his stats
are fluff, but the 1-3 record speaks volumes. I wouldn't be surprised
to see Walsh in the second half if things don't go well against a
pretty good Pack D. Plus it's been raining here all night and morning
and that sorry field is going to be a quagmire tonight.
Spud
|
9.2709 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Mon Oct 31 1994 15:23 | 6 |
| > You just tend to run hog wild with the
> most innocuous quotes.
Wow, who does THIS remind me of......
|
9.2710 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Oct 31 1994 16:44 | 9 |
|
>> Wow, who does THIS remind me of......
I suppose I could (should?) have left that last line off and still
made my point. And I can only assume that you're referring to how I
bust your stones when you say things like, "Sam Huff had Jim Brown's
number" when in reality Sam has missing teeth, an 'S' shaped nose and
the painful memory of gaining consciousness on a training table after
having Brown's number tattooed on his forehead.
|
9.2711 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Tue Nov 01 1994 08:44 | 13 |
| > made my point. And I can only assume that you're referring to how I
> bust your stones when you say things like, "Sam Huff had Jim Brown's
> number" when in reality Sam has missing teeth, an 'S' shaped nose and
> the painful memory of gaining consciousness on a training table after
> having Brown's number tattooed on his forehead.
Nah, you just don't do it to me, you do it to everybody....
As to Huff and Brown, so you saw a highlight where Brown creamed him.
I saw a highlight where he creamed Brown....
Big whoop.
|
9.2712 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Tue Nov 01 1994 10:01 | 3 |
|
Who won last night?
|
9.2713 | GB, 33-6 | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Tue Nov 01 1994 10:13 | 15 |
| Green Bay, 33-6.
Major rain storm. With winds around 20-30 mph the rain was a major
factor.
Green Bay got a couple of break early went up 14 points and then put
Edgar Bennett to work.
Meanwhile, Chicago was pitiful with Kramer, switched to Walsh with the
same results and was lucky to score at all.
Most of the crowd left after the retirement of Sayers' and Butkus'
jersies.
TTom
|
9.2714 | Chicago to be lucky to finish .500 | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Tue Nov 01 1994 11:06 | 7 |
| The Vikes were outbid for Mitchell by Detroit and Kramer elects
Chicago. The Vikings then "settle" for a trade with Houston to get Moon.
Talk about breaks...
Spud
|
9.2715 | no good O | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Tue Nov 01 1994 11:18 | 13 |
| Chicago is in complete disarray now.
Kramer was the man but starts slow. When he went down, Walsh took over
and won. Kramer comes back and gets his job back. Same results as before,
losing.
This brings us to the Storm Bowl lasted night. Kramer looks bad, the
Bears bring in Walsh and now he looks bad, too.
Wannstedt says he'll announce his starter tomorrow but it looks like it
doesn't matter. Chicago is not dang good on offense.
TTom
|
9.2717 | Why did their fans expect so much? | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Tue Nov 01 1994 12:16 | 9 |
| Re: .2715
Actually, Chicago isn't very good all around. I really thought they
were doing it with mirrors during the little surgence when Walsh filled
in. This just isn't that good a team. I'd be surprised if they finish
above fourth in the division.
Spud
|
9.2718 | | CAMONE::WAY | A beach, a book, and a babe | Tue Nov 01 1994 12:21 | 16 |
| >
> Actually, I read it in SI's 40 For The Ages issue. They rated Brown
> 4th, Huff didn't make the list. I'd guess that if Huff had Brown's
> number, he wouldn't have been the one with the busted nose, the broken
> teeth and the concussion.
>
I dunno, that's kind of a stretch, I think.
I wasn't all that impressed with SI's 40th list -- some spots on that
list were dubious at best.
As I said, I've seen Giants highlight films were Huff was all over Brown.
But, I'll admit that it could have been as isolated an incident as the SI list.
|
9.2719 | Sam Huff-- choker? ;-) ;-) ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 01 1994 12:43 | 11 |
|
I believe that it was Huff himself who recounted in that issue the
beatings he regularly took from Jim Brown. SI didn't make it up; Huff
volunteered the information. This Legend of Sam Huff just won't die
in New York. He's probably something like the 30th all-time best
linebacker, and the record suggests that the Colts and Packers teams
of the day didn't have that much trouble scoring on these Giant
defenses in the big championship games.
glenn
|
9.2720 | | CAMONE::WAY | Death where is thy sting? | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:02 | 25 |
| >
> I believe that it was Huff himself who recounted in that issue the
> beatings he regularly took from Jim Brown. SI didn't make it up; Huff
> volunteered the information. This Legend of Sam Huff just won't die
> in New York. He's probably something like the 30th all-time best
> linebacker, and the record suggests that the Colts and Packers teams
> of the day didn't have that much trouble scoring on these Giant
> defenses in the big championship games.
Well, okay. I didn't see the issue, I saw the list.
As I've said, I've seen some highlights films where Huff mauled Brown.
As for the record, the Giants were blown out once by the Packers (37-0 I think)
and once by the Colts. The other games with the Packers and Colts (one
a piece) were very close affairs -- the Colts game was the famous
Sudden Death game.
Their 1963 game against the Bears was a 14-10 loss, in which Mike Ditka
played a big role for the Bears if I remember right.....
'Saw
|
9.2721 | Just ask the analysts... ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:07 | 12 |
|
> As for the record, the Giants were blown out once by the Packers (37-0 I
> think) and once by the Colts. The other games with the Packers and Colts
> (one a piece) were very close affairs -- the Colts game was the famous
> Sudden Death game.
Yup, but if Huff had been man enough to step up to the table and haul
down Alan Ameche like a real linebacker in Chuck Bednarik did to Jimmy
Taylor, who knows what might have happened... aw, I'm just bustin' you...
glenn
|
9.2722 | Jimmy Brown/The Pack/Barry Sanders | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:07 | 15 |
| I gotta jump in on this one!
I find it inconceivable that Huff could have the number of
probably the finest running back the game has ever known.
No one player could possibly have his number.
Great Packer win!
Finally, I'd like to start a mini-controversy...
Who's the best running back right now? I say its Barry Sanders,
but it seems a lot of people like Emmit Smith. What do you
think?
Tony
|
9.2723 | Main Main Means | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:12 | 17 |
| The FFLers like Emmett a whole lot better'n Barry.
Barry seems to be putting up the biggest numbers thised year but he
continues to not score. Of particular note, he was caught from behind in
one of his breakaways during the Gints game.
Emmett seems to be the better big game player. Of course, Barry really
hasn't had too many big games - have to win to make playoffs, any playoff
game, etc.
Kinda lost in the shuffle in Thurman Thomas who had a big game against
the Chiefs.
And then there's my main main, Natrone Means, who looks like he's
starting to come into his own.
TTom
|
9.2724 | Marshall Faulk | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:14 | 2 |
|
|
9.2725 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:25 | 12 |
| | Great Packer win!
Hardly an estetic masterpeice by my "other" favorite team.
I still beleive that Farve is not an NFL starting QB, and
in fact don't beleive they will go anywhere with him at
the helm.
On the other side of the ball, is there a better defensive
player right now than Reggie White? That guy is just
manhandling the opposing o-linemen.
=Bob=
|
9.2727 | Paup looked good | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:34 | 12 |
| re: White.
I haven't seen that much of Green Bay but it looks like the guy who plays
on the other side of the field, Bryce Paup, really helps White out.
Lasted night, against the Bears, it seemed like ever time they tried to
double White, Paup made the play. He had one sack and a couple of
interceptions. All in all, the Packer D forced 2 other fumbles.
I'm keeping my eye on 92 and 95.
TTom
|
9.2730 | | SCOONE::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:41 | 10 |
| re: White and Paup
Paup's game seems to be quickness. He gets angles, and
gets to the play quickly. You're right, the threat of him
from the other side probably makes White more threatening.
White is just tossing people aside as if they were Kevin
Farley.
=Bob=
|
9.2731 | Color me bitter... ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:43 | 14 |
|
> I think 90% of this Sam Huff stuff and guff was made up
> by the New York media.
Yeah, it's kind of ludicrous that in the present-day recounting of
those glorious days, the Packers and Giants dominate the spotlight.
The Packers deserve it. Meanwhile the images of legitimately great
players and teams like the '58-'59 Baltimore Colts fade from memory.
Ain't no one from any of those Giant defenses that was as good as
Gino Marchetti, not one. Frank Gifford couldn't carry Lenny Moore's
jock, etc., etc. It goes on and on... ;-)
glenn
|
9.2732 | Where is....? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Hear me now, believe me later | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:48 | 5 |
| Just a quick question - Whatever happened to Christian Okoye(sp), the
KC running back?
UMDan
|
9.2733 | just ask Carter | HBAHBA::HAAS | been to the mountain tops | Tue Nov 01 1994 13:52 | 9 |
| >White is just tossing people aside as if they were Kevin
>Farley.
Just talk to Chris Carter who made the big mistake of trying to block
Reggie lasted week. Reggie threw Carter back so far and hard that he
almost tackled Moon. Reggie, not through on the play, gave Moon a
standing 8-count for a sack.
TTom
|
9.2734 | CC, don't mess with them big boys | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Chicago has wimpy winters | Tue Nov 01 1994 14:01 | 4 |
| That was one of the funniest looking plays of the year.
Spud
|
9.2735 | | CAMONE::WAY | Death where is thy sting? | Tue Nov 01 1994 14:04 | 15 |
| re Barry getting caught from behind:
It took one of, if not THE, fastest guy on the Jints to catch him.
re "old" Giants teams:
Yabbut, I'll bet you'd bet hard pressed to find better coaching
than they had -- Lombardi and Landry arguably were two of the
best to ever become head coaches.....
'Saw
|
9.2736 | Ki-Jana Carter is the next Marshall Faulk... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Nov 01 1994 14:34 | 1 |
|
|
9.2737 | I had to ask | CSC32::J_HENSON | and it's still too short! | Tue Nov 01 1994 17:38 | 6 |
| >> <<< Note 9.2731 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>
>> -< Color me bitter... ;-) >-
>> Frank Gifford couldn't carry Lenny Moore's jock, etc., etc.
Why would he want to?
|
9.2738 | Come on Waugamain | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Nov 01 1994 19:27 | 5 |
| reply .2736
Ki Jana Carter isn't even as good as Rashan Salaam! ;-
Frank
|
9.2740 | What's best back in the country Errict Rhett up to? ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Nov 02 1994 09:36 | 19 |
|
>> -< Ki-Jana Carter is the next Marshall Faulk... >-
>
> Marshall Faulk is barely the next Marshall Faulk yet. I'd
> like to think that we learned something from the premature
> coronation of Drew Bledsoe as the next Dan Marino.
I'm just offering my opinion of which players teams should be looking
at in next season's draft, as potential impact-type players. Two years
ago I liked Bledsoe, last year it was Faulk, this year I'm very much
impressed with the speed and power combination of Ki-Jana Carter, who
is better than any other running back I've seen this year, including
Salaam and Tyrone Wheatley. But you're absolutely correct in your
brilliant deduction that come draft time, as in the past none of these
players will have established NFL careers as a basis for the talent
evaluators to go on. I'm impressed Tommy...
glenn
|
9.2742 | No opinion, however simple, safe if Tommy's in town... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Nov 02 1994 10:20 | 23 |
|
> Yup, you really went way out on a limb with those two. Gutsy
> move. Drew was only everyone's pick to be either number one or
> two and Faulk was the consensus pick as the best back in the draft.
Well, I admit that the opinions were innocent enough, but damned if
you didn't vehemently disagree on each one and give me piles of grief
just the same... ;-)
> My point is
> simply that you rushed to crown Drew after two whole games. The sad
> fact *now* is that he's had two games in a row that were as bad as the
> first two were good and now we have Cleveland, Minnesota and Junior
> Say-oww! coming to town and we could be 3-8 afterward (remember when
> you pointed out that Drew had us "with a winning record" when we were
> 3-2? Please contain yourself.) and Drew could be in a wheelchair.
My opinion on Bledsoe hasn't changed one bit (go ahead and find the
most supposedly outrageous statement I ever made), but try not to
sound so happy about the prospects of the next few weeks...
glenn
|
9.2744 | It's vantage point: I'm looking up from college, from youth | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Nov 02 1994 12:09 | 43 |
|
> But honestly, the kid has played
> nine whole games as a pro and his career could end next game with-
> out him having played a whole season and some college kid is "the next
> Marshall Faulk"?
Also seriously, I didn't mean anything more by that than "next
rookie-of-the-year candidate to burst on the scene", or similar. You
take it one step at a time, because I agree that anything can happen,
most of which are out of the player's control. The talent is there in
the here and now, that's all I'm saying.
> I'm sure at least your opinion that he's a complete qb has changed.
> I'd be shocked if it hadn't.
I don't believe he's a complete QB, in the sense where "complete" means
great, or near-great. I said that before. I told you that I likely
misread the meaning of that particular quote from Parcells, as Bob Ryan
did. I was wrong on that point. However, I do still agree with the
sentiment (not necessarily Parcells') that if this is all there is (and
it's kind of a dumb "what if", because it just doesn't work that way;
players get better or they regress), it still ain't bad at all, and
overall is comparable to what many teams only have with more
experienced QBs (I'd use the mediocre Neil O'Donnell as an example
from another team I follow-- I believe that if a team like the
Steelers had a Drew Bledsoe, they'd be a real threat in the very near
term, if not this season). Whether that means "complete" or not
doesn't really matter.
The "euphoria" part of it doesn't much enter into it with me. I'm not
even that big a Pats' fan. I guess I just have a different way of
looking at it. First and foremost, I'm a college football fan above
an NFL one, and part of that is showing some interest and excitement in
these young players as they hit the big time, regardless of where. I'll
root for Ki-Jana Carter if he becomes a New York Giant, even (I draw the
line at the Cowboys). The Pats piling up some losses as Bledsoe takes
his lumps and makes mistakes doesn't bother me, not even a little bit
(unless he gets hurt), because I can maintain interest in even
inconsistent game-to-game individual efforts on a team that at this
time is still expected to lose.
glenn
|
9.2745 | | 25022::BREEN | Get these mutts away from me | Wed Nov 02 1994 14:11 | 12 |
| I missed Sunday and the Jets game but prior to that I thought that
Bledsoe's arm looked tired. This 55 per game plus all the throws in
practice may have taken it's toll.
It finally seems like the media and some fans have taken the gloves off
with Parcells. His golden persona seems to be tarnished a bit. I've
never seen anyone given the slack he's had in this town.
I do admit that his teams have generally executed better than before.
I'd even say that if he'd just kept Russell he'd be two games better.
billte
|
9.2747 | Pushed | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Nov 03 1994 10:50 | 3 |
| The Patsies were pushed out to 4:00 again this week.
t
|
9.2749 | Consider the Other Ten Men On The Field | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Thu Nov 03 1994 13:31 | 20 |
| Back to Barry Sanders...
Just to include the simply notion that it is a team game and what
might Sanders do as a Cowboy and what might Smith do as a Lion?
I read in the previous Sunday Boston Globe where they discussed
Erik Williams and how his loss will hurt. They mentioned the
Cowboy drive in the 2nd half that came after the Buffalo 3 and out
after their turnover. It was all Emmit behind Williams.
And believe me...I watched the Pack play Detroit then Dallas in the
playoffs. I was a LOT more worried about Aikmen than Kramer. Much
more worried about their o-line. More concerned with Ervin than
Moore, etc., etc.
I'm only one opinion, but if someone backs me against the wall and
tells me my football team can have Sanders or Smith, I would reply
(in a heartbeat) SANDERS!!!!
Tony
|
9.2750 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | AtDEC18Years.ItAllEndsNovember18th. | Thu Nov 03 1994 13:45 | 1 |
| He's yours! Take him.
|
9.2751 | My .02 | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Nov 04 1994 08:09 | 16 |
| 'tween Sanders and Smith,
I'd take one over the other based on my O-line. Sanders seems to
create things, and gets yardage despite the offensive line. But he's likely
to be run down after a few yards and doesn't (in my mind) really spring big
gains that often.
Smith on the other hand, needs a big line to open the initial seam.
He really needs to get up to speed, and that takes opening a spot for him. Once
going, Emmit is incredibly tough to stop, and if difficult to run down. Once
he's gotten past the first 5 yards, watch out.
Both are a joy to watch though. Sanders in my mind is pure finesse,
while Smith is a power back IMO.
zamboni
|
9.2752 | He Springs The Big Ones | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Fri Nov 04 1994 08:27 | 22 |
| re: zamboni
I agreed with much of your note save the part about Sander's
not making many big gains. Actually, he springs the big gain
more than anyone in the NFL for at least the last 10 years!!
Just check game stats on longest runs from scrimmage.
Also, he is pretty fast. When the Lions played the Pack in
the playoffs last year, Sanders had a couple wide runs where
he just blew by people.
I don't know about that Giants play mentioned a few back, but
one person said the guy that caught up to him just happened
to be the fastest guy on the Giant's roster.
The only edge I might give Smith is durability and how good
a straight north-south runner he is. Smith makes good subtle
cuts where he basically is still going north-south and yet the
tackler often doesn't have a solid enough hold of him to get
him down.
Tony
|
9.2753 | He does? | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Fri Nov 04 1994 16:53 | 17 |
| > I agreed with much of your note save the part about Sander's
> not making many big gains. Actually, he springs the big gain
> more than anyone in the NFL for at least the last 10 years!!
> Just check game stats on longest runs from scrimmage.
Really? I've never compared the stats of the two of them, and am
basing my opinions on having watched the two of them on the tube. Granted it's
slightly slanted and Smith is on in New England much more than Sanders is.
Plus every Lions game I catch Sanders seems to have a mellow day. Sure
he gets 100+ yards, but all in little 3 and 4 yard gains mostly. No big rips.
Maybe I just catch him on bad days?
Does anyone have stats on the number of 10+ yard gains these two backs
have had?
zamboni
|
9.2754 | All Purpose Running BAckj | FABBIT::S_NACCACHIAN | | Mon Nov 07 1994 11:29 | 10 |
|
What about playing when they are not 100%. Smith always does the
job, even without being 100%. Sanders gets injured easier probably due
to his running style. I had to agree that Sanders is a better runner than
Smith. But Smith is a better running back than Sanders. Smith is more
dangerous due to his receiving as well as running. I think he's a
better blocker too.
Serge
|
9.2756 | | CAMONE::WAY | Take me, subcreature! | Mon Nov 07 1994 12:12 | 1 |
| I think Emmitt is a better runner, but I'll bet Barry is the better driver 8^)
|
9.2757 | Means is having probs in the red zone lately | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 07 1994 14:42 | 18 |
| Marshall is doomed, its tough to be a great Running back when your
picked and predicted to be a great one :-)
Although wasnt sanders drafted very HIGH, I know emmitt was a middle
to late pick, Bettis a late round, Means 2nd round, not sure on Thomas
either....
Value is looked at in soo many different ways... emmitt/marshall lead
in TD's, Sanders in Yards, but in my FFL League Means is the leading
scorer as you get bonus pts for going over 100 yrds :-). So who is
the best, tough to say but being lumped together with any of these
guys means your successful
Top 5: Emmitt, Sanders, Means, Thomas, Faulk
What order, would be very hard to say, but Id list Faulk at #5
mab
|
9.2758 | | BSS::MARLAND | | Mon Nov 07 1994 14:50 | 2 |
| if I remember right Sanders was the number one pick in 1989 and Bettis
was number 9 in 1993.
|
9.2759 | thomas second round because of his knees | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Mon Nov 07 1994 14:57 | 5 |
|
thomas was picked in the second round and Emitt was I think either the 3rd
or 4th pick in the draft his year.
mike
|
9.2760 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:12 | 4 |
|
I think Emmitt went a little later in the first round and was a steal
for Dallas at the time, but who can remember what happened 5 years ago.
|
9.2762 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:28 | 5 |
|
with all the early draft picks Dallas had I seriously doubt that Emitt
went that late........
mike
|
9.2763 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Swimsuit Issue - Sonic Youth | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:33 | 2 |
|
I stand corrected pulled out a magazine Emitt was the 17th pick that year.....
|
9.2764 | opinions on RB's | BSS::MENDEZ | | Mon Nov 07 1994 15:34 | 15 |
| I would certainly take Bettis over Faulk. I think that also Watters
is a more established back as well as Foster. Faulk has a great deal
of potential but I think he has some work to do to be in the top five
among running backs. The Fantasy Football Leagues cannot take into
consideration what a back really means to a team. For example: There
have been years that Leroy Hoard, Reggie Cobb, Vince Workman, Brad
Baxter, etc were leading ffl statistics. How many of those would you
take over Foster, Allen, Sanders, Smith, Means, Thomas, Watters,
Hampton, Bettis, and others??? It is when a RB gains yards that
determine how good a back is.. ESmith has a great line but he gets
alot of yards in the second half and especially the 4th quarter. Same
with Sanders, Thomas, Bettis, Foster, Hampton. Those guys get the
tough yards even when the opposing defense knows they have to be
stopped. To me it is between smith and sanders.
|
9.2765 | Faulk's a game-breaker, durability will be only question | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:10 | 31 |
|
> It is when a RB gains yards that determine how good a back is.
I don't know anything about FFL stats, but going into the weekend's
games, Faulk was still 2nd in the entire NFL in rushing yards, with a
good average. He can't be considered "established" but only because he's
a rookie; it goes without saying that even the best have to start from
that position. I'd take him over Watters right now, though, definitely.
I think he can do more things than Bettis, too, and should surpass him
if he doesn't get hurt (Bettis is a horse; he's just going to pound it
out 30 times a game, 3.5 a pop). Foster's continued injury history
already limits his practical worth.
As for this weekend, Faulk simply didn't get the ball. I turned the game
on in the 2nd quarter and the Colts continued to try and pass with an
injured and ineffective Majkowski; I wondered if Faulk was hurting or
something. I don't know why the Colts played it this way, even after
they took the lead. But still, I thought he showed good hands and
skills as a pass receiver (he got wide open deep a couple of times only
to have the ball overthrown), and the moves and speed on the cutback
run were unmistakable. 5 yards a carry on the ground, 5 catches,
43 yards, that's not a bad day at all. What does he mean to his team?
Well, as usual, his 110 total yards were over half the Colts' offense;
Faulk continues to lead the league in percentage of his team's offense,
by far, because the team offense is so lousy and he's the only real
weapon. I think he's a hell of an all-around back. The only thing I'm
not sold on yet is his ability to take it 25 times a game, every game,
like Sanders and Smith can do.
glenn
|
9.2766 | Yes Id take faulk over bettis/watters etc | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 07 1994 16:47 | 6 |
| I dont have the exact stats but Means is #1 in the AFC. I beleive he
is up approx 20yrds on Faulk and has already has his bye week (Faulk
is on a bye this week). So Id say Means will be up around 100+Yrds
on faulk after this weekend...
mab
|
9.2767 | Always liked him | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Nov 09 1994 10:36 | 7 |
|
I know we like to keep politics out of this file, but on a related
sprots note, Steve Largent has been elected as a congressman from
Oklahoma.
Kevin
|
9.2768 | Bozworth can't be far behind :*) | AD::HEATH | Dawgs rule Pats sip | Wed Nov 09 1994 11:47 | 8 |
|
I was wondering if he got that house seat. No mention of him on the
idiot box last night. (I did turn in at 10:00 though).
Jerry
|
9.2769 | Why Me??! | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Wed Nov 09 1994 12:05 | 34 |
| As a Packer fan, it is time for a little 'Barry Sanders'
draft recap and as I dwell upon it, I can have a real nice
puk!!!
Going into the last game of the season, Green Bay played
against the Cardinals and were something like 8 point under-
dogs. Lose and they have the top pick in the draft which
everyone knew would be Aikman.
Of course they win.
Every GM today would acknowledge that their #2 choice in the
draft would have been
TONY MANDARICH
The following is the draft order...
1) Dallas - Troy Aikmen
2) Green Bay - Tony Mandarich
3) Detroit - Barry Sanders
4) Kansas City - Derrick Thomas
So the Pack is sandwiched between perhaps the finest quarterback
and running back in the NFL. A spot later is one of the finer
LB's.
Needless to say, its not one of those things I like to dwell
on!!!
Tony
|
9.2770 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | and it's still too short! | Wed Nov 09 1994 12:26 | 12 |
| >> <<< Note 9.2769 by STRATA::BARBIERI "God cares." >>>
>> -< Why Me??! >-
>> 1) Dallas - Troy Aikmen
>>
>> 2) Green Bay - Tony Mandarich
What's even weirder is that Tom Landry, who was still with the Cowboys
at the time, wanted to draft Mandarich over Aikman. He was basically
forced to take Aikman.
Jerry
|
9.2771 | ;-) | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Nov 09 1994 13:28 | 1 |
| Who's Mandarich?
|
9.2772 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Nov 09 1994 18:23 | 6 |
| re: a few back
Jim(?) Watts a former OU player was elected to the House from Oklahoma.
The Cray Met
|
9.2773 | J.C. | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Nov 09 1994 18:41 | 13 |
| > <<< Note 9.2772 by 57045::FRANCUS "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>
> re: a few back
>
> Jim(?) Watts a former OU player was elected to the House from Oklahoma.
>
> The Cray Met
Rush said it was J.C. "Julias Caesar" Watts, Republican.
Kevin
|
9.2774 | | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Nov 10 1994 00:02 | 4 |
| oh no you listen to Rush; sigh :-(
The Crazy Met
|
9.2775 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Thu Nov 10 1994 08:32 | 2 |
| Largent, Watts, and Jim Bunning (re-elected) were the "Sports Ticket" last
night, as reported on the news.....
|
9.2776 | Old St. Louis southpaw | 25022::BREEN | | Thu Nov 10 1994 10:59 | 1 |
| Is Vinegar Bend Mizell still in Congress?
|
9.2777 | Big Daddy | HBAHBA::HAAS | And this am the way it goes. | Thu Nov 10 1994 11:11 | 6 |
| Big Daddy Don Garlitz also won a seat in Florida.
Richard Petty was running for a state post but I haven't heard if'n he
won.
TTom
|
9.2778 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Thu Nov 10 1994 11:13 | 4 |
| >Big Daddy Don Garlitz also won a seat in Florida.
Cool....
|
9.2779 | Boomer Sooner... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Browns rule, Pats SIP! | Thu Nov 10 1994 11:35 | 14 |
|
> Rush said it was J.C. "Julias Caesar" Watts, Republican.
Yep, Husker-killer Watts becomes only the second black Republican in
the House. Sumpin' must have happened to J.C. since the time he sang
"What the World Needs Now is Love Sweet Love" to a national TV audience
before going out and beating the Seminoles in the Orange Bowl. ;-) Rush
sucking up to Julius Caesar Watts; I think I'm going to be ill...
My boyhood hero and former NE Patriot Jack Mildren, being a Dem, of
course lost in the governor's race.
glenn
|
9.2780 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | whatchyalookinat? | Thu Nov 10 1994 12:11 | 3 |
| I believe that Garlits lost (at least that's what my paper says).
UMDan
|
9.2781 | could be | HBAHBA::HAAS | And this am the way it goes. | Thu Nov 10 1994 12:14 | 7 |
| ESPN said he won but I don't know fer sure.
They had a little blurb about ex-sportsters and they showed Largent,
Bunning, and some other guy winning and Mario Cuomo losing. Did Cuomo
play sports or is he headed to some commish job?
TTom
|
9.2782 | | PTOS01::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm DTN: 422-7253 | Thu Nov 10 1994 12:19 | 1 |
| I think Cuomo played college baseball.
|
9.2783 | at least North lost | 57045::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Nov 10 1994 12:36 | 5 |
| Cuomo played minor league baseball
Bush played in college.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2784 | just in case you were wondering | MKFSA::LONG | Like your freedom? Thank a Vet! | Thu Nov 10 1994 12:39 | 8 |
| >> -< Old St. Louis southpaw >-
>>Is Vinegar Bend Mizell still in Congress?
He played for the Bucs on the 1960 World Series team, too.
billl
|
9.2785 | | TOOK::HALPIN | The BROWNS HAVE AN AWESOME SQUAD THIS YEAR, the PATS SIP | Thu Nov 10 1994 13:04 | 6 |
|
Cuomo's name is being mentioned as a possible Baseball Commish
now....
|
9.2786 | Slip out the back Jack | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Mon Nov 14 1994 13:07 | 6 |
|
Report out of Houston says that Pardee has been canned after yerterday's
loss to the Bengals.
Kevin
|
9.2787 | items | HBAHBA::HAAS | And this am the way it goes. | Mon Nov 14 1994 13:08 | 27 |
| Wild weekend in the NFL.
Chicago faked a FG at Miami that looked like it was choreographed by the
Three Stooges. Da Bears snapped the ball to the up man Curtis Conway
who shoulda been tackled a couple of times behind the line but somehow
got away. He threw a dead duck that Billy Kilmer woulda been proud of,
bounced off of a Bear and 2 Dolphins and into the hands of Keith Jennings
who scored.
In another sign that the Apocalypse is nigh, Jim Everett is now tied with
Hall of Famer Roger Staubach at 156 career TDs.
Jeff Blake, the newly installed Bengal QB Jeff Blake, of semi-local East
Carolina fame, was carted off the field but came back to lead Cincy over
hapless Houston. Attention Fantasy Footballers: Blake finished with 4
TDs.
Barry Sanders ran for 237 yards and no scores. Emmitt Smith lost ground
in his quest for a 4th rushing title, finishing with a mere 78 yards. But
Smith scored twice.
Cleveland still hasn't allowed anyone to rush for 100 yards and this
streak shouldn't be threatened at KC.
Dan Marino has now thrown for 20 TDs for 11 straight years, a_NFL record.
TTom
|
9.2788 | points | HBAHBA::HAAS | And this am the way it goes. | Tue Nov 15 1994 14:04 | 68 |
| Some numbers:
Here's the points for, points against and difference. Then it's sorted by
points scored, then points against, and then difference.
Enjoy,
TTom
Team G PF PA Diff Team G PF PA Diff
MIA 10 239 187 52 SF 10 295 186 109
BUF 10 205 198 7 DAL 10 262 141 121
NYJ 10 173 184 -11 SD 10 243 164 79
IND 10 216 233 -17 MIA 10 239 187 52
NE 10 210 239 -29 MIN 10 224 164 60
CLE 10 219 118 101 WAS 10 220 279 -59
PIT 10 176 156 20 DEN 10 220 243 -23
CIN 10 175 251 -76 CLE 10 219 118 101
HOU 10 147 218 -71 IND 10 216 233 -17
SD 10 243 164 79 PHI 10 216 174 42
KC 10 195 192 3 NE 10 210 239 -29
LRD 10 203 222 -19 NO 10 209 261 -52
DEN 10 220 243 -23 GB 10 205 143 62
SEA 10 195 196 -1 BUF 10 205 198 20
DAL 10 262 141 121 LRD 10 203 222 -19
PHI 10 216 174 42 ATL 10 200 226 -26
ARI 10 126 198 -72 DET 10 199 217 -18
NYG 10 171 220 -49 SEA 10 195 196 -1
WAS 10 220 279 -59 KC 10 195 192 3
MIN 10 224 164 60 LRM 10 179 197 -18
CHI 10 172 182 -10 PIT 10 176 156 7
GB 10 205 143 62 CIN 10 175 251 -76
DET 10 199 217 -18 NYJ 10 173 184 -11
TB 10 124 229 -105 CHI 10 172 182 -10
SF 10 295 186 109 NYG 10 171 220 -49
ATL 10 200 226 -26 HOU 10 147 218 -71
LRM 10 179 197 -18 ARI 10 126 198 -72
NO 10 209 261 -52 TB 10 124 229 -105
Team G PF PA Diff Team G PF PA Diff
CLE 10 219 118 101 DAL 10 262 141 121
DAL 10 262 141 121 SF 10 295 186 109
GB 10 205 143 62 CLE 10 219 118 101
PIT 10 176 156 20 SD 10 243 164 79
MIN 10 224 164 60 GB 10 205 143 62
SD 10 243 164 79 MIN 10 224 164 60
PHI 10 216 174 42 MIA 10 239 187 52
CHI 10 172 182 -10 PHI 10 216 174 42
NYJ 10 173 184 -11 PIT 10 176 156 20
SF 10 295 186 109 BUF 10 205 198 7
MIA 10 239 187 52 KC 10 195 192 3
KC 10 195 192 3 SEA 10 195 196 -1
SEA 10 195 196 -1 CHI 10 172 182 -10
LRM 10 179 197 -18 NYJ 10 173 184 -11
BUF 10 205 198 7 IND 10 216 233 -17
ARI 10 126 198 -72 DET 10 199 217 -18
DET 10 199 217 -18 LRM 10 179 197 -18
HOU 10 147 218 -71 LRD 10 203 222 -19
NYG 10 171 220 -49 DEN 10 220 243 -23
LRD 10 203 222 -19 ATL 10 200 226 -26
ATL 10 200 226 -26 NE 10 210 239 -29
TB 10 124 229 -105 NYG 10 171 220 -49
IND 10 216 233 -17 NO 10 209 261 -52
NE 10 210 239 -29 WAS 10 220 279 -59
DEN 10 220 243 -23 HOU 10 147 218 -71
CIN 10 175 251 -76 ARI 10 126 198 -72
NO 10 209 261 -52 CIN 10 175 251 -76
WAS 10 220 279 -59 TB 10 124 229 -105
|
9.2789 | Rison suspended | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | One hand clapping | Wed Nov 16 1994 15:15 | 6 |
| Falcons suspended Andre (I smell smoke) Rison for 1 game (vs Denver)
for breaking team rules. Coach Jones said that he had warned Andre last
week about this. Details as they become available.
UMDan
|
9.2790 | Dave Brown back at Giants helm | HBAHBA::HAAS | And this am the way it goes. | Thu Nov 17 1994 13:13 | 6 |
| Dan Reeves flipped another coin and it came up Dave Brown.
Graham goes to the bench. I guess ol' Dan dint like the way he looked
agin the Cards.
TTom
|
9.2791 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Nov 17 1994 14:29 | 2 |
| Just when Collie Boy said a QB needs more than 1 week to show his
wares.
|
9.2792 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Nov 21 1994 09:13 | 12 |
| I saw a GREAT TD last night in the Rams-49ers game, but I only saw
the tail end of it.
I was kind of busy at the time, had the TV on and was keeping one eye on
it, and I saw #81 on the Rams doing he best scramble and dash through
the 49er defense.
With his number, I thought it might have been a pass or it could have
been an end-around or something. Even with all the replays I never saw
the first part of the play.
Can someone fill me in?
|
9.2793 | HTH | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Lets Go Hoyas | Mon Nov 21 1994 09:25 | 9 |
|
It was a reverse.
I think his name was Kinchen?
Chap
|
9.2794 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Nov 21 1994 09:28 | 8 |
| > It was a reverse.
Cool.
> I think his name was Kinchen?
I didn't catch his name, but I thought the run was great -- lots of
second effort.....
|
9.2795 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Mon Nov 21 1994 10:31 | 12 |
| >> <<< Note 9.2794 by CAMONE::WAY "The Devil's to pay!" >>>
>>I didn't catch his name, but I thought the run was great -- lots of
>>second effort.....
The guy's name is Kinchon. He's a 3rd year man out of LSU. And, San
Francisco only had 10 men on the field. Deion had left the field as it
was a short yardage situation, and no one else came in. The play broke
the line of scrimmage at the place where Deion (or whomever) should
have been. Regardless, though, it was a great run.
Jerry
|
9.2796 | Todd Kinchen | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Nov 21 1994 10:51 | 11 |
| The guy's name is Todd Kinchen. He's from LSU and the play in question
was a_end around. Overall, Kinchen looked good enough to play for the
Niners.
Several other higlights included a Jerry Rice TD where he carried a
linebacker into the end zone and a Flipper Anderson TD beating Neon
completely for a_uncontested TD. Chris Miller played the best game I ever
seen him but San Fran continued there dominance over the Rams to win
31-27.
TTom
|
9.2798 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Mon Nov 21 1994 12:17 | 10 |
| Quick question:
How many wildcard teams and what's the playoff format.
I can't remember if there are three WC teams, and two of them
play each other to eliminate one, or what.....
I guess the mind is the first thing to go.....
|
9.2799 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Mon Nov 21 1994 12:21 | 9 |
|
Three wildcard and worst Div. winner play Dec 31/Jan 1
Winners play the other two Div. champs Jan7/8
Winners play for Conf Champ Jan 15
SB Jan 29
|
9.2800 | collision | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Nov 21 1994 12:23 | 8 |
| Saw, you got 3 divisional winners and 3 wild cards in each confernce.
The opening round of playoffs has the worst divisional winner against the
worst wild card. The 2 other wild cards play each other, hosted by the
better of 'em. Winners advance to the nexted round and take on the 2
best best divisional winners.
TTom
|
9.2801 | Exciting but not very efficient or productive on the day... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Nov 21 1994 12:26 | 17 |
|
> Did anyone watch Philly-Arizona yesterday? The play, where
> Randall escaped the grasp of a Philly defender, pitched the
> ball to Herschel and then took out two Cardinal defenders with
> a picture perfect block, was exhibit A on why Randall is one of
> only a handful of players in the NFL who are themselves worth
> the price of admission.
Terrible clock and play management on the last two possessions, though.
Arizona came up with a good pass rush but Cunningham wasted far too
much time scrambling around and eventually either getting sacked or
having to throw off-balance, instead of just standing in there, getting
rid of the ball and taking his chances (even if he were to be
intercepted). I wasn't terribly impressed, and Philly may be fizzling.
glenn
|
9.2803 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Mon Nov 21 1994 12:46 | 6 |
|
That's at least the 3rd game this year the Cards have screwed up clock
management, and gotten away with it. It's gotta catch up to them
sooner or later.
brews
|
9.2804 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Tue Nov 22 1994 01:04 | 14 |
| Houscum again snatches defeat from the jaws of victory, blowing a 14-7
lead in the fourth to lose on a FG on the nexted to last play of the
game.
Final
Hapless Giants 17
More Hapless Oilers 14
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
JaKe
|
9.2805 | More like 13-10 | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Tue Nov 22 1994 08:46 | 18 |
| >> <<< Note 9.2804 by PTOS02::JACOBR "snoring thru my life" >>>
>> Final
>> Hapless Giants 17
>> More Hapless Oilers 14
JaKe,
I don't know what game you were watching, but the score on
the one that I watched was 13-10, Giants. Other than this
slight discrepency, though, I agree with you assessment
of the game.
Jerry
|
9.2806 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Tue Nov 22 1994 09:02 | 1 |
| Even Dan Reeves gets lucky once in a while.....
|
9.2807 | | PTOS01::JACOBR | snoring thru my life | Tue Nov 22 1994 09:07 | 8 |
| RE wrong score, ya, I noticed that this am. Nathan(5 yr old) was
barfing his guts out lasted night(musta been a bad jar of Cheez-Whiz)
and I got a little corn-fused.
Sorry
JaKe
|
9.2808 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Tue Nov 22 1994 13:00 | 11 |
|
Did anyone else think that Graham, the Giants QB looked familiar on
the lasted play of the 1sted half? I mean after he smartly ran out the
clock so the Giants couldn't kick a FG and he had a bewildered look on
his face. He looked just like Woody HArrelson. No, not the Woody
Harrelson who was a bon vivant and man-about-town in Natural Born
Killers, or even the Woody Harrelson who was the paragon of virtue in
White Man Cain't Jump, but the Woody Harrelson who didn't know his ass
from a time out in Cheers. Sheeit, he was a dead ringer for the guy.
brews
|
9.2809 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Tue Nov 22 1994 13:30 | 4 |
| Kent Graham has always had that "My momma was a moron, my daddy was
an idjit" look......
I'd have that look all the time if I played for Dan Reeves too....8^)
|
9.2810 | Results?? | 25022::BREEN | And what of the shaft | Mon Nov 28 1994 10:17 | 3 |
| Anyone got full thur-sun nite results.
Can't find the 49ers score and thurs results are from memory
|
9.2811 | | NETCAD::NISKALA | Moisten needle before inserting. | Mon Nov 28 1994 10:21 | 2 |
| Niners play tonite and in the AMERICAN_FOOTBALL conference, the
Thursday stats/results are posted...
|
9.2812 | ] | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | How Unkind, Arrested for flying while blind | Mon Nov 28 1994 10:21 | 2 |
|
The 9er's play tonight
|
9.2813 | thanks - don't know how I forgot | 25022::BREEN | And what of the shaft | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:23 | 1 |
| Thanks, the game I missed was Minn-Tampa bay. Another dog winner.
|
9.2814 | one mattered | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Nov 28 1994 11:41 | 6 |
| A grand total of one spread mattered, the Denver-Cincy game where the
Donks won but dint cover.
For the rest, whoever won the game won that other thing.
TTom
|
9.2815 | SF, maybe Dallas, SD, and some others | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Nov 30 1994 12:08 | 19 |
| Update on playoffs:
San Francisco (10-2) has clinched the NFC West. If'n they win the rest of
their games, they will clinch the home field until the Super Bowl.
Here's what others can clinch thised weekend.
Dallas (10-2) can clinch the NFC East if'n they beat or tie the
Philadelphia. Even if'n they lose, they can clinch a wild card with a
Minnesota loss, Detroit tie or loss, or a_Atlanta tie of loss.
San Diego (9-3) can clinch the AFC West with a victory against the
Raiders and a KC loss to Denver.
Miami (8-4), Pittsburgh (9-3), and Cleveland (9-3) can clinch wild cards
with the right combinations of winning while others lose.
TTom
|
9.2817 | teammates not that happy | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Dec 01 1994 16:23 | 7 |
| Evidently, not everyone is that big on Marshall, including some of his
teammates. As Faulk gets closer to the rookie team record for running
yardage, the complaints are starting to be heard that he's getting the
ball so often that the other team can focus on him and has been slowing
his running and hence the overall offense has suffered.
TTom
|
9.2818 | Blake not eligible for RoY | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass - #1 Baby - unbelievable!!! | Thu Dec 01 1994 16:24 | 4 |
| Jeff Blake's not a rookie, Tommy. Was with the Jets lasted year. They
cut him this summer to protect Glenn Foley!
NAZZ
|
9.2819 | Are these 2-month-old complaints? Faulk's carries fallen off... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Dec 01 1994 17:24 | 17 |
|
> Evidently, not everyone is that big on Marshall, including some of his
> teammates. As Faulk gets closer to the rookie team record for running
> yardage, the complaints are starting to be heard that he's getting the
> ball so often that the other team can focus on him and has been slowing
> his running and hence the overall offense has suffered.
You wouldn't know it from this past game against the Pats and the couple
previous. Faulk wasn't handed the ball much at all (he did get some
action as a receiver). I agreed with the ESPN announcers; the time
comes when you forget about the decoy and go with your strengths. The
Colts went too much with the pass; it's not a team strength and not
only wasn't it productive, its (Majkowski's) mistakes cost them the
game in the second half.
glenn
|
9.2820 | Bad news from Seattle | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | STEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAM | Fri Dec 02 1994 07:49 | 9 |
|
Chris Warren and 2 other teammates were in a car accident last
Night. Warren has 2 broken ribs and is in jail for Vehicular assault.
On of the other guys is in critical condition with a neck injury?
Chap
|
9.2821 | ESPN Gameday interview | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | One hand clapping | Fri Dec 02 1994 09:32 | 11 |
| Saw a quick clip on ESPN Halftime last night for an interview that will
appear on ESPN Gameday this Sunday. It was with Stanley Wilson, RB
with Cincy on their Superbowl team. He apparently disappeared the
night before the big game. On the clip last night, Wilson admits to
being holed up in a hotel room with a bag of coke, snorting and smoking
away. I don't seem to remeber much about the game except that Montana
led the 'Niners to a victory with a last minute drive.
May be interesting viewing.
UMDan
|
9.2822 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Fri Dec 02 1994 09:35 | 1 |
| Who won last night, anyway?
|
9.2823 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | STEELERSmyALLTIMEfavoriteTEAM | Fri Dec 02 1994 09:39 | 5 |
|
Minny 33 -27 in OT
K. Butler missed a 40 yd FG in OT and it cost them big!!!!!!!!!
|
9.2824 | 3 Seahawks injured in a car accident. | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Fri Dec 02 1994 10:25 | 24 |
|
Three Seahawks injuried in a car accident last night:
Chris Warren - two fractured ribs on the right side, treated and
released.
Lamar Smith - chip fracture in his spine and left ankle. He is
listed in satisfactory condition and is being held
for observation.
Mike Frier - is listed is serious condition with a severe neck injury.
Warren's black Chevy Blazer collided with the power pole at 8:41 P.M.
PST and knocked out electricity to several thousand residents in the
area.
JimH
|
9.2825 | oops | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 02 1994 10:33 | 16 |
| re: lasted night.
Butler missing the FG cost who bigtime? ;-)
re: Stanley Wilson
The guy was such a_addict he couldn't do without one night before the big
game. He reacted to this like he missed the bus or something. Then he
says that if'n he had played, the Bengals woulda won. I'm not too sure
about the part where Joe loses the super bowl but, in any case, it's just
more shame on hisself.
I'm gonna try to catch the interview - it'll be hard to miss even if'n
all you watch is Sprotscenter.
TTom
|
9.2826 | As usual Boston tops Ohio | 25022::BREEN | But in the land of the One-eyed Men | Fri Dec 02 1994 12:09 | 10 |
| didn't half the Patriots team pull the same cocaine snorting, partying
stunt before the '86 superbowl.
Pat Sullivan tried to hide it, Ron Borges uncovered it and reported it,
Everyone connected to the Pats blamed Ron and boycotted him to the
extent that he started reporting boxing full time and other
non-football stuff.
But now he's back to #1 Globe Pats coverage with boxing coverage of big
matches.
|
9.2827 | | WMOIS::BALL_K | | Mon Dec 05 1994 08:56 | 2 |
| Does anybody know who the reporter was that Parcells chewed out in the
post game press conference yesterday? ...funny stuff
|
9.2829 | Only read the quote wish I could have seen it | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Mon Dec 05 1994 11:42 | 5 |
|
No name given the paper but it did say he was from the Pawtucket Times.
Jerry
|
9.2830 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 05 1994 12:59 | 3 |
| What did the reporter ask?
George
|
9.2832 | no sympathy for Wilson | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Dec 05 1994 14:56 | 19 |
| re: Stanley Wilson.
I had a chance, thanks to ESPN, to see most of thised interview.
What you have here is the basic bleeding heart liberal type of angle on
how wo is Stanley and what a shame and he couldn't control hisself. A
real boo-hoo kinda tear-jerker.
What I noticed mostly was the complete lack of any type of contrition for
letting down his family, friends and teammates. And the fack that he
seemed to take no responsibility for what he did. Mostly it was a lot of
Stanley talking about Stanley and how the Bengasl woulda won with him,
etc. It seems his big embarrasment in the matter was his worry over what
his son thinks of him.
The final topping on the cake: he wants a chance to comeback and play
in the NFL. After he gets outta jail, that is.
TTom
|
9.2833 | Lighten up Bill | SLICK1::MAILLOUX | | Mon Dec 05 1994 15:08 | 11 |
|
I was watching the 5th quarter as well, and I think Mr. Bill
was totally out of line. A simple no would have sufficed. Also
he berated Mike Dowling again for asking if he thought Bledsoe
lost his composer after the interception just be half time. I
wonder what his wife thought of his statement, that he only
listenes to his wife sometimes....
RM
|
9.2834 | HE'S A MEGALOMANIAC!!! | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Tue Dec 06 1994 08:39 | 9 |
| re: last few
I think Bill Parcells sometimes displays megalomaniacal
tendencies!! I really do!
He really comes off as pompous. In his own eyes, a king
or maybe a god.
Good coach tho.
|
9.2835 | bruins and Sox are steadfast; Pats and C's frontrunners | AKOCOA::BREEN | But in the land of the One-eyed Men | Tue Dec 06 1994 17:37 | 10 |
| The difference between the baseball fans and football fans is that the
former are there in the good and the bad times.
The Patriots were very hot in the mid-late 70s with the Hannah,Morgan,
Grogan teams with lots of popular players and sellouts. Then a
combination of boring teams (Berry) and losing teams sent 60% off the
golf courses and ski chalets or wherever.
Meanwhile the Redsox are near capacity despite Hobson, Gorman and
Haywood. But the strike may kill that goose.
|
9.2836 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 06 1994 18:16 | 6 |
| Sorta helps that Fenway's capacity is only 47 people.
(8^)*
JaKe
|
9.2837 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 06 1994 23:41 | 2 |
9.2838 | yea its a bandbox | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Wed Dec 07 1994 07:22 | 5 |
|
it is actually closer to 33K.
j/
|
9.2839 | | WMOIS::BALL_K | | Wed Dec 07 1994 08:19 | 1 |
| At 33,000, is it the smallest park in the league ?
|
9.2840 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Devil's to pay! | Wed Dec 07 1994 08:49 | 4 |
| > At 33,000, is it the smallest park in the league ?
I think it's approximately 34.5K.....
|
9.2841 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 07 1994 09:36 | 25 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2835 by AKOCOA::BREEN "But in the land of the One-eyed Men" >>>
> The difference between the baseball fans and football fans is that the
> former are there in the good and the bad times.
>
> The Patriots were very hot in the mid-late 70s with the Hannah,Morgan,
> Grogan teams with lots of popular players and sellouts. Then a
> combination of boring teams (Berry) and losing teams sent 60% off the
> golf courses and ski chalets or wherever.
Well it depends, is this just a Boston area phenomena or have you seen it
elsewhere?
In Boston I don't believe that the Patriots are a good example of a team
with fair weather fan support. In the past, many fans in the New England area
hated the Patriots even when they were winning.
The problem in the past was the management and their stile of conducting
business. Both the Sullivans and Victor Kiam were egotistical scum that were
always out to screw someone, hardly anyone who's team you could love.
This new owner, coach, and team are something else entirely. I can be a fan
of this team regardless if they win or lose.
George
|
9.2842 | Kind of an incentive program to interst you in the product | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | We're #5 Baby; that's not too bad! | Wed Dec 07 1994 09:56 | 3 |
| Which local bordello is offering the free samples?
NAZZ
|
9.2844 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Wed Dec 07 1994 10:15 | 6 |
| > playing in Fenway in August is much easier to bear than a stanky Patriots
> team in Foxboro in December.
Especially with those metal seats!
|
9.2845 | Yes, Pittsburgh is a good example of the other kind | AKOCOA::BREEN | But in the land of the One-eyed Men | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:26 | 6 |
| George, I think you're referring to the malaise of the 80s. In the 70s
the Pats were very popular and the crowds were similar in volume and
enthusiasm to today.
And yes in some towns the football team gets the all-weather fans. I
was referring to the situation in Boston up to last year.
|
9.2846 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 07 1994 15:35 | 22 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2845 by AKOCOA::BREEN "But in the land of the One-eyed Men" >>>
> George, I think you're referring to the malaise of the 80s. In the 70s
> the Pats were very popular and the crowds were similar in volume and
> enthusiasm to today.
Maybe they drew good crowds but I remember there being a lot of people back
in the '70s that hated the Pats, particularly out in the western part of
Massachusetts where I was living at the time.
It wasn't because of winning or losing, it was just that the Sullivans
somehow managed to piss people off so much that they couldn't identify with the
team.
A bunch of us took to liking Miami instead and became fans just before they
got really good. It was fun being a Dolphins fan during their undefeated
season.
As for the Red Sox, they went through some pretty lean years when they were
losing. Back in the late 50's and early 60's there were plenty of empty seats.
George
|
9.2847 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Wed Dec 07 1994 16:59 | 23 |
|
> Maybe they drew good crowds but I remember there being a lot of people back
>in the '70s that hated the Pats, particularly out in the western part of
>Massachusetts where I was living at the time.
Western Mass is not a very good place to benchmark enthusiasm for
any Boston sports teams (or for the city of Boston in general). I have
friends who live in Pittsfield, and find that they are so far and
isolated from Boston, that they'ld just as soon become part of Vermont
or NY.
Many of the people I've met out there are fans of the NYC based
franchises, regardless of how the Boston teams are faring...
The Pats of the late 70's were a big deal in the eastern 2/3rds of
the state...
JimH
|
9.2848 | otherwise known as the Jay Mollo factor | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Wed Dec 07 1994 17:08 | 5 |
|
I remember going to a Celtics/Lakers game out at the Springfield Civic
Center years ago and there were as many Laker fans as C's....
mike
|
9.2849 | Hicksville Mass | CSLALL::BRULE | go ahead with your own life leave me alone | Thu Dec 08 1994 09:49 | 10 |
| I'm from Western Mass (North Adams to be exact) and the people out
there have quite a few options. Most people get TV stations from
Hartford, Boston, Albany and some NYC. I remember in my neighborhood
some kids rooted for the Red Sox, some the Yankees, some the Mets and
quite a few were O's fans. (Mark Belanger was a big reason for that)
Giants and Pats were the big football teams. The loyalty to the local
(Boston) teams was not nearly as strong as it is in Eastern Mass.
Mike
|
9.2850 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Thu Dec 08 1994 11:13 | 6 |
|
I, too, grew up in Wesatern Mass. I don't think the Pats were that
popular because there were still a lot of old time Giants fans around,
and the PAts never gave anyone a reason to jump ship.
brews
|
9.2851 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Dec 08 1994 11:24 | 10 |
| That may well be. We were big Giants fans back in the Y.A. Tittle and Frank
Gifford day.
But with regard to baseball, we were solid Red Sox fans. There were a very
few Yankee fans around but they were generally outnumbered 10-1.
This was the Northampton/Amherst area in the Connecticut River valley north of
Springfield.
George
|
9.2852 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Thu Dec 08 1994 12:12 | 9 |
|
Well I grew up in Western Mass and I realized that the Sox had
dumbfu#2ed ownership and dumbfu#4ed players so I went to a Yankee game
once and the rest as they say is HIStoryyyyyyyy....
Chap
|
9.2853 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CasinoMania | Thu Dec 08 1994 12:39 | 6 |
| Back in the early to mid 70's going to Foxboro was not just
a football game, it was an adventure. The crowds made the Thunderdome
folks look tame by comparison. Sigh, I miss those good old days,
especially now when the Foxboro parking lots look like a BMW dealer.
/Don
|
9.2854 | hide the wimmin and children | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Dec 08 1994 14:03 | 2 |
| yeah, that is the reason why Monday Night Football banned them and Dad
would never take me to a game there.
|
9.2855 | | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625 | Fri Dec 09 1994 08:11 | 7 |
| Mike,
I think it was the town of Foxboro that banned the Pat's from monday
night games, not Monday Night Football themselves. I was at a MNF game
in 1976, vs the Jesters. Barely escaped with all limbs intact.
RTG
|
9.2858 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:15 | 2 |
| Anyone know what's going on with the AMERICAN_FOOTBALL conference ?
Haven't been able to get in all day.
|
9.2859 | Just the SKILL POSITIONS | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:00 | 18 |
|
They are picking the Pro_bowl squad Tursday I believe.
Heres Mine AFC
QB Marino
QB Kelly
RB Faulk
RB Means
RB Thomas
WR T Brown
WR I Fryar
WR A Reed
TE Coates
TE Glover
|
9.2860 | NO WAY! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:04 | 6 |
|
Can't see how you can put Thomas in there...my pick would have to
be Hoard of the CLEVELAND BROWNS!!!
WOOF!
|
9.2861 | Leroy Hoard! | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:08 | 0 |
9.2863 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:21 | 3 |
| The defensive side is easy, just pick the starters that wear Black n Gold.
Keith
|
9.2864 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:23 | 7 |
|
Come on man.......not giving much credit to the DAWGS....Got to
put Langham in there....Rookie of the Year!
Warren should also be there. Faulk should not go at all!
WOOF!
|
9.2865 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:30 | 7 |
| > Come on man.......not giving much credit to the DAWGS....Got to
> put Langham in there....Rookie of the Year!
OK, your howling makes some sense here. The All-Pro defensive team should be
made up of 10 Steelers and 1 token Dawg. I'll admit, Langham looks great.
Keith
|
9.2866 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Dec 13 1994 12:34 | 8 |
|
and your going to have to put Turner on there too. Just for the
great stop in Dallas but he's done lots more than that for the DAWGS.
Could be the best tandem in the league. Brings back memories of the
mid 80's.......
WOOF!
|
9.2867 | 2 WORDS FOR YA | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Stabler>Bradshaw Tatum>Blount | Tue Dec 13 1994 13:20 | 3 |
|
TERRY MCDANIEL
|
9.2868 | GO PACK!! | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Tue Dec 13 1994 13:39 | 3 |
| Joe, I just got in American Football five minutes ago.
Made my Packer entry!!
|
9.2869 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 13 1994 15:36 | 9 |
| Hey HAL, what "great stop in Dallas" are you talking about, the lasted
play of the game????
If so, get yer haid out of yer a$$ and watch the tapes of the game, if
Novacek doesn't S L I P and fall, the 'Spots would be 9-5 right now.
All Turner had to do was touch Novacek.
JaKe
|
9.2870 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 16:56 | 12 |
9.2871 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | INDIANS CAVS BROWNS | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:05 | 17 |
|
Yea.....what he said..........!!!!!
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND
CLEVELAND
BROWNS
BROWNS
BROWNS
WOOF!
|
9.2872 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:09 | 4 |
9.2873 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:10 | 4 |
9.2874 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:10 | 4 |
9.2875 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:10 | 4 |
9.2876 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:21 | 2 |
| If Clevelanders had brains, the city wouldn't be the excrement capital
of the world.
|
9.2877 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 13 1994 18:21 | 2 |
| If Clevelanders had eyes that worked, they would marry women from out
of town.
|
9.2878 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Tue Dec 13 1994 21:24 | 11 |
| If a frog had wings, he wouldn't bump his ass every time he jumped.
If yer uncle had t_ts, you'd call him "Aunt", or Bernice.
If a plane full of Dr. Scholl's Odor Eaters crashed in Clevescum, the
city would almost dissappear.
STEELERS will prevail Sunday
JaKe
|
9.2879 | Quit spreading misinfo, Groaner! ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 14 1994 09:28 | 9 |
|
> If each opponents TD were worth 50, the Steelers would be 0-14.
The opponents haven't scored a TD on the Steelers in four games this
year...
glenn
|
9.2880 | Good 'Ol Gary, Indiana | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:05 | 5 |
| Whoever thinks Cleveland is the pits has not been to
Gary, Indiana!! You can drive for what seems like hours
through Chicago and suddenly shriek, "WHAT'S THAT SMELL??!"
Answer: We just crossed into Gary!
|
9.2881 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:21 | 6 |
| re: .2880
talk about a left-handed compliment. ha!
The Crazy Met
|
9.2882 | Just humming an old tune | AKOCOA::BREEN | Come Monday... | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:23 | 3 |
| I take it's not the place I want to be.
And Met, left-handed compliments are compliments indeed;
|
9.2883 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:41 | 1 |
| Gary, Indiana, Gary Indiana, Gary Indiana.....
|
9.2884 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:51 | 13 |
9.2885 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:56 | 7 |
| re: .2884
which is why when people from Cleveland drive anywhere else they are a
road hazard.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2886 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 12:58 | 4 |
9.2887 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Wed Dec 14 1994 13:08 | 15 |
|
> See, in Cleveland people understand and obey the rules of the road.
> In Mass, people have no clue. Ever drive through the rotary in Hudson,
> MA. People in the rotary have the right of way. Signs are posted.
> People still have no clue. Maybe the problem is, people in the state
> of Mass can't read.
You know, the scary thing is that I've regularly seen cops there
_ignoring_ the idiots who plow into the rotary as if they have the
right of way.
Now, there are certainly some things I like about Massachusetts, but
give me Ohio drivers any day...
Joe
|
9.2888 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 13:20 | 26 |
9.2890 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 13:41 | 2 |
9.2891 | self-incriminating | SALEM::DODA | Stop global whining | Wed Dec 14 1994 13:43 | 3 |
| Yeah, but what state are you sittin' in right now?
daryll
|
9.2892 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 13:51 | 2 |
9.2893 | Since when? | SALEM::DODA | Stop global whining | Wed Dec 14 1994 13:58 | 1 |
|
|
9.2894 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:02 | 5 |
9.2896 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:10 | 4 |
9.2897 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:16 | 23 |
|
>> Perhaps you should move back to Cleveland and get a job with
>> the company that manufactures those lovely dog masks that you
>> folks wear so as not to make the female Clevelanders quite so
>> aware of your unattractiveness.
Tommy, Tommy,Tommy,
How many times do I have to say it....THEM ARE NOT MASKS!!!!!!!!
Them are the mutant results of years of breeding between the people
that live in the area of Ohio called Cleveland, and the intake of the
large toxic levels in that area, which is also the world's largest
inhabited raw sewage adn toxic waste dump.
Groaner, I've been to Clevescum, and once in a lifetime is one too many
times.
I used to service some machines in the Post Office
warehouse(whorehouse??) that was a stone er two's throw from Lake Erie
and the sludgepound that younzes call a stadium. Unless they nuked the
place and started over, it has no hope of ever being decent.
JaKe
|
9.2898 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:37 | 9 |
| Just in case you missed it.
Deion intercepts a pass and runs one back 90 yards for a TD Sunday
and then goes into his little dance. One announcer says "this guy
should play offense, be a return man anything to get the ball because
every time he touches it he's scores" The other announcer agrees
and says "I bet Deion has never been IT his whole life".........
Jimbo
|
9.2899 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:38 | 1 |
| do you mean IT like in tag or hide&seek?
|
9.2900 | NFL SNARF | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:38 | 1 |
|
|
9.2901 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Dec 14 1994 14:55 | 1 |
| yes
|
9.2902 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:01 | 7 |
|
I myself would like to see someone clean his clock after that little dance
he does. That crap has no place in the game. I think they should a
outlaw all that BS. everything from "In your face to Goal post dunks"
should draw unsportsmanlike conduct flag along with a nice fat fine.
|
9.2903 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:03 | 4 |
| why give a hoot about a dance or dunk?
The Crazy Met
|
9.2904 | It has no place in the game | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:08 | 1 |
|
|
9.2905 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:09 | 2 |
|
It's all so some jive a*8 mf can show off. okay!!
|
9.2906 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:10 | 4 |
9.2907 | I think I did!! | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:11 | 1 |
|
|
9.2908 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:13 | 5 |
|
Cadzilla is just jealous cause he can't dance like Deion.
I think it's called strut envy.
Claybone
|
9.2909 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:19 | 6 |
|
Clayboy,
I don't care if you call it wahtusi, boogaloo, or a fox trot it still
bs
|
9.2910 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:20 | 1 |
| wait til he does that against the 'Girls, then he'll really get mad!
|
9.2911 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:21 | 12 |
| I agree with Cad in that I find the "in your face" stuff
annoying. I disagree that it should be outlawed, however.
Instead, they should not call penalties when players
retaliate.
Cain't you just see it now - Dion goes into his dance,
and some big-butt lineman walks up and "boff", decks
Dion with a forearm shiver.
What fun.
=Bob=
|
9.2912 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:25 | 4 |
| It only shows that Deion is a egotistical, no-brained show-off.
JaKe
|
9.2913 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:30 | 6 |
|
I agree with Cad. Someone should clean his clock but good. Not because of
his dance routine but becuase he picks a fight with Andre Rison who's
about a half foot and 40 pounds smaller. Real tough guy that Dieon.
mike
|
9.2914 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:34 | 9 |
|
There's already a system in place for stopping post touchdown dances. It's
called the tackle.
When a team stops Dion from going into the endzone, he doesn't have anything
to dance about. If they are sloppy and let him in the endzone then they deserve
what they get.
George
|
9.2915 | I objected to "Goldie" Richards but where'd it ever get me? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:36 | 6 |
|
Yeah, what's a Cowboys' fan doing complaining about flash and dash?
It's the very tenet that that pretty-boy franchise was founded on...
glenn
|
9.2916 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 14 1994 15:42 | 4 |
|
Glenn the mans name was Golden not Goldie. Blame his parents not Tom
Landry. Blame a guy name Taylor ( Otis?) of the AFL Chiefs for starting
all this jive bs.
|
9.2917 | | SALEM::DODA | Stop global whining | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:01 | 4 |
| Puh-lease. Yeah Deion is a jerk, unless he's in the uniform of
{insert your favorite team here}.
daryll
|
9.2918 | These guys are humans not machines | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:02 | 8 |
| Being a 9er fan; I wish that Deion would tone it down some. But every
team in the NFL has somebody doing a similar routine. How about the
semi sack celebration by Greene of Pittsburgh. I believe that Gant
has a little celebration that happens on special teams tackles. I
know that Shannon Sharpe does a flex routine when he scores on a
touchdown pass. The celebration may bite the 9ers in the butt some
day. You never know when it will fire up an opponent.
|
9.2919 | Keep The Refs Outta It | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:15 | 13 |
| I personally wouldn't dance around if I was fortunate enough
to be in a position like Deion.
My feeling though is that its wimpy to want the refs to suppress
Deion's antics. Let the team do it by preventing him from getting
into the endzone and by completing passes in his coverage, etc.
What a wimpout to cry to the refs!!!
Just play the game and make your own statements on the field without
reliance on the refs.
Tony
|
9.2920 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | We be the Tools BAT | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:30 | 5 |
|
I agree it's not up to the ref's, it should be the league that puts a
stop to the nonsense. I don't mean just Deion's but all of it. What
started with the spike has turned into a "oh look at me I made a play"
The players are paid to make the plays, not to dance on the gridiron.
|
9.2921 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 14 1994 16:36 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 9.2919 by STRATA::BARBIERI "God cares." >>>
> My feeling though is that its wimpy to want the refs to suppress
> Deion's antics. Let the team do it by preventing him from getting
> into the endzone and by completing passes in his coverage, etc.
Exactly! Well said.
Same for guys who dance after decking the quarterback. There's a method for
stopping that as well called blocking.
It's all a matter of basic fundamentals. "If you block and tackle you will
win and in this league winning is everything" -V.L.
I suppose the modern corollary is "we don't want to get our uniforms dirty by
blocking and tackling, please make a rule to stop the other team from
celebrating when we screw up".
And you guys laugh at me because I like figure skating.
George
|
9.2922 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Wed Dec 14 1994 19:51 | 15 |
|
>> What
>>started with the spike has turned into a "oh look at me I made a play"
>>The players are paid to make the plays, not to dance on the gridiron.
Actually, all the dorky dancing around started with Elmo Wright's TD
celebration 20 or so years ago.
I never could stand any of the stupid "dancing" around after
TD's/sacks/tackles/flatulence.
JaKe
|
9.2923 | NFL NOTES | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Thu Dec 15 1994 10:39 | 8 |
| ESPN reported last night that Deion "Prime-Time" Sanders is
trying to recruit former teammate & sparing partner Andre
Rison to the 49ers next year!
New England will be sending the following players to the Pro-Bowl:
TE Ben Coates
OT Bruce Armstrong
QB Drew Bledsoe
|
9.2924 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:15 | 3 |
9.2925 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:19 | 3 |
| voted by the players and coaches!
Jimbo
|
9.2926 | The "Undertaker" deserves Pro-Bowl Honors | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:24 | 3 |
| Once again Linebacker & defensive captain Vincent Brown
was left off the team. I can't wait to see who plays
the inside for the AFC!
|
9.2927 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:29 | 10 |
|
> Once again Linebacker & defensive captain Vincent Brown
> was left off the team. I can't wait to see who plays
> the inside for the AFC!
I dunno. I've heard murmurings that Vincent Brown is not having even
a Vincent Brown-caliber season...
glenn
|
9.2928 | Not to speak of Maurice Hurst | AKOCOA::BREEN | Come Monday... | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:30 | 1 |
|
|
9.2929 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:32 | 15 |
| | Once again Linebacker & defensive captain Vincent Brown
| was left off the team. I can't wait to see who plays
| the inside for the AFC!
It is curious that a team whose defense has played better than
its offense (IMO) is sending only offensive players to the
Pro Bowl.
I think Brown's problem is that he plays at a position that
is "deep" in talent. Kinda like Mo Vaughn with the Red
Sox - he may be the best player on the team, but there are
people at the same position in the league who are ahead
of him.
=Bob=
|
9.2931 | IF someone can't go he'll be there/ I haven't seen the team | AD::HEATH | Can the Pats duplilcate it??? | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:37 | 7 |
|
Have to agree about Brown. If Seau's injuries where serious he'd
have been there. With Cox moving from outside to inside down in Miami
it was purely a numbers game.
Jerry
|
9.2932 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:41 | 3 |
9.2933 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:41 | 38 |
9.2934 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:43 | 22 |
9.2935 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:46 | 12 |
| I'm not surprised that the QBs lead the fumble leaders. They handle
the ball more than anyone else.
I'll bet a lot of those are of the fumbled snap variety.
With the prevalence of the d-line using that chop that LT used so successfully
to try and strip the ball on the pass play, it'd be interesting to see
stats from say, 15 or 20 years ago, to see how they compare today....
'Saw
|
9.2936 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 15 1994 11:51 | 72 |
9.2937 | | MKFSA::LONG | I miss Billy the kid | Thu Dec 15 1994 14:10 | 4 |
| Could someone please post all of the Pro Bowl selections.
billl
|
9.2938 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Dec 15 1994 14:11 | 4 |
9.2940 | careful, your maturity is showing | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Thu Dec 15 1994 14:38 | 1 |
|
|
9.2942 | y | PTOS02::JACOBR | Red Dust and Spanish Lace | Thu Dec 15 1994 19:07 | 33 |
|
-- Offense -- -- Defense --
Total Rushing Passing Total Rushing Passing
Arizona 27 20 23 3 7 6
Atlanta 8 28 4 28 16 27
Buffalo 9 7 12 16 8 24
Chicago 23 16 20 13 27 4
Cincinnati 18 19 14 12 22 7
Cleveland 21 11 21 8 12 8
Dallas 6 5 10 2 11 3
Denver 7 21 7 27 20 26
Detroit 13 2 22 22 23 13
Green Bay 11 22 9 6 4 14
Houston 26 15 25 10 28 2
Indianapolis 25 4 28 23 15 22
Kansas City 5 14 6 14 18 11
LA Raiders 19 18 19 7 5 15
LA Rams 22 24 15 18 13 20
Miami 1 12 1 24 6 28
Minnesota 3 17 3 5 1 23
NY Giants 28 10 26 15 21 12
NY Jets 16 13 18 17 14 17
New England 4 27 2 19 17 18
New Orleans 12 26 8 26 19 25
Philadelphia 10 8 13 4 10 5
Pittsburgh 15 1 24 1 9 1
San Diego 14 9 16 11 3 21
San Francisco 2 6 5 9 2 16
Seattle 24 3 27 21 24 10
Tampa Bay 20 23 17 20 25 9
Washington 17 25 11 25 26 19
|
9.2943 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Fri Dec 16 1994 06:41 | 7 |
| Arguments on pro bowl skill players
Mathis should be on instead of Irvin.
Watters instead of Bettis.
Jeff George instead of Aikman.
Jimbo
|
9.2944 | A Case for Brett Favre | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | God cares. | Fri Dec 16 1994 08:19 | 13 |
| re: -1
Check out Brett Favre's numbers. #2 ranked QB in entire NFL
on a team with little or no running game. Last six games 18
TD's verses (I think) 5 int's. Against top defense and top
passing defense at the time (Dallas), throws 4 TD's while team
manages ~30 yards rushing all game.
BUT, in clutch situations, hasn't always come through.
There is a case for him though.
Tony
|
9.2945 | Farve and George, two faux stars | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Dec 16 1994 09:42 | 17 |
| | BUT, in clutch situations, hasn't always come through.
Now THERE'S an understatement.
Even as a Packers fan, I can say this.
I agree that the Packers' running game is nothing to
speak of, but Brett Farve being rated as the #2 QB is
clearly a statistical aboration. Farve is better than
he was lasted year, but he still makes among the worst
decisions in the league.
The other anomily is Jeff George. He is getting good
protection thised year, but he still makes Tony Eason
look like Joe Kapp (toughness wise that is).
=Bob=
|
9.2946 | a joke | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:26 | 6 |
| > New England will be sending the following players to the Pro-Bowl:
> QB Drew Bledsoe
Amazing. Just goes to show you that YARDS has a stronger influence than
the other QB categories. Bledsoe has a 57% completion ratio, and is -5
in td/int, contributing to his 70.3 QB rating (near the bottom of the AFC).
|
9.2947 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:32 | 6 |
|
actually Joe, I think it has to with who sells the most merchandise. Judging
by the number of #11 Patriots Jerseys you see around the area, Bledsoe is a
pro-bowl caliber merchandiser.......
mike
|
9.2948 | Plus he's already doing McDonalds' commercials | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:33 | 0 |
9.2949 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:33 | 14 |
|
>> Amazing. Just goes to show you that YARDS has a stronger influence
>> than the other QB categories. Bledsoe has a 57% completion ratio,
>> and is -5 in td/int, contributing to his 70.3 QB rating (near the
>> bottom of the AFC).
I think you have to take into account his supporting cast or lack
thereof, the fact that he's had to throw so much and that there just
aren't that many great QBS in the AFC. Players were saying as early as
the first two games this year that Bledsoe was special and they ob-
viously voted that way. It would have been a huge joke if he had been
voted the starter but third string? That's about right. Who would
you have voted ahead of him?
|
9.2950 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:40 | 3 |
| > Who would you have voted ahead of him?
Jim Kelly (63.6%, 3100+ yds, +5).
|
9.2951 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:40 | 1 |
| But Kelly's out for the season.
|
9.2952 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:41 | 1 |
| Does anyone have the full listing of Pro Bowl selections ?
|
9.2953 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:53 | 120 |
|
> Does anyone have the full listing of Pro Bowl selections ?
x == Starter...
National Football Conference
============================
Offense
-------
Wide Receivers -- x-Jerry Rice, San Francisco; x-Cris Carter,
Minnesota; Sterling Sharpe, Green Bay; Michael Irvin, Dallas.
Tackles -- x-William Roaf, New Orleans; x-Lomas Brown, Detroit; Mark
Tuinei, Dallas.
Guards -- x-Nate Newton, Dallas; x-Randall McDaniel, Minnesota; Jesse
Sapolu, San Francisco.
Centers -- x-Mark Stepnoski, Dallas; Bart Oates, San Francisco.
Tight Ends -- x-Brent Jones, San Francisco; Jay Novacek, Dallas.
Quarterbacks -- x-Steve Young, San Francisco; Troy Aikman, Dallas,
Warren Moon, Minnesota.
Running Backs -- x-Emmitt Smith, Dallas; x-Barry Sanders, Detroit;
Jerome Bettis, Los Angeles Rams.
Fullback -- Daryl Johnston, Dallas.
Defense
-------
Ends -- x-Reggie White, Green Bay; x-Charles Haley, Dallas; William
Fuller, Philadelphia.
Interior Linemen -- x-John Randle, Minnesota; x-Leon Lett, Dallas; Dana
Stubblefield, San Francisco.
Outside Linebackers -- x-Ken Harvey, Washington; x-Bryce Paup, Green
Bay; Seth Joyner, Arizona.
Inside Linebackers -- x-Chris Spielman, Detroit; Jessie Tuggle,
Atlanta.
Cornerbacks -- x-Deion Sanders, San Francisco; x-Aeneas Williams,
Arizona; Eric Allen, Philadelphia.
Safeties -- x-Darren Woodson, Dallas; x-Merton Hanks, San Francisco;
Tim McDonald, San Francisco.
Specialists
Punter -- Reggie Roby, Washington.
Kicker -- Fuad Reveiz, Minnesota.
Kick Return Specialist -- Mel Gray, Detroit.
Special Teamer -- Elbert Shelley, Atlanta.
American Football Conference
============================
Offense
-------
Wide Receivers -- x-Tim Brown, Los Angeles Raiders; x-Andre Reed,
Buffalo; Irving Fryar, Miami; Rob Moore, New York Jets.
Tackles -- x-Richmond Webb, Miami; x-Bruce Armstrong, New England; Gary
Zimmerman, Denver.
Guards -- x-Keith Sims, Miami; x-Steve Wisniewski, Los Angeles Raiders;
Duval Love, Pittsburgh.
Centers -- x-Dermontti Dawson, Pittsburgh; Bruce Matthews, Houston.
Tight Ends -- x-Ben Coates, New England; Shannon Sharpe, Denver.
Quarterbacks -- x-Dan Marino, Miami; John Elway, Denver; Drew Bledsoe,
New England.
Running Backs -- x-Marshall Faulk, Indianapolis; x-Natrone Means, San
Diego; Chris Warren, Seattle.
Fullback -- Leroy Hoard, Cleveland.
Defense
-------
Ends -- x-Bruce Smith, Buffalo; x-Leslie O'Neal, San Diego; Neil Smith,
Kansas City.
Interior Linemen -- x-Michael Dean Perry, Cleveland; x-Cortez Kennedy,
Seattle; Chester McGlockton, Los Angeles Raiders.
Outside Linebackers -- x-Derrick Thomas, Kansas City; x-Greg Lloyd,
Pittsburgh; Kevin Greene, Pittsburgh.
Inside Linebackers -- x-Junior Seau, San Diego; Bryan Cox, Miami.
Cornerbacks -- x-Rod Woodson, Pittsburgh; x-Terry McDaniel, Los Angeles
Raiders; Dale Carter, Kansas City.
Strong Safety -- x-Carnell Lake, Pittsburgh; Steve Atwater, Denver.
Free Safety -- x-Eric Turner, Cleveland.
Specialists
Punter -- Rick Tuten, Seattle.
Kicker -- John Carney, San Diego.
Kick Return Specialist -- Eric Metcalf, Cleveland.
Special Teamer -- Steve Tasker, Buffalo.
|
9.2954 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Dec 16 1994 10:59 | 12 |
| If this was a vote then I'm surprised Jim Kelly didn't get selected despite
his injury.
In baseball people vote for who they like then the coach of the all-star team
makes the necessary replacements.
Despite being a Bledsoe fan, I feel that Kelly deserves the honor of the
vote. Bledsoe is fine as a replacement.
Of course Bledsoe did have the record breaking game ...
George
|
9.2955 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Fri Dec 16 1994 11:39 | 8 |
|
Does the QB rating system calculate the following. Something
in the effect of Pass attempts/Interception ratio? If player X
throws the ball 250 times and threw 13 interceptions. Then you have
a Bledsoe who threw 500 times and 26 interceptions. If you calculate
player X out to 500 attempts you would also get 26 INT's.
Ron
|
9.2956 | lies, damn lies, statistics | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 16 1994 11:44 | 14 |
| From what I understand, a lot of the stats behind the QB rating are based
on what happens in terms of number of attempts: TDs, interceptions,
average yardage, etc.
The highest rated QB may or may not be the best. In some years, it looks
like it follows, like this year where Steve Young seems to be leading at
least the NFC. However, some stats like how many games won, are not part
of this.
I guess when you caint prove your case about who's best, you can bring
out a bunch of statistics to confuse the issue. QB ratings cerainly fall
into this category.
TTom
|
9.2957 | NFL QB rating system may be worse than Heiser's PG rating... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 16 1994 11:53 | 18 |
|
Bledsoe's QB rating is much more bogus than his Pro Bowl selection for
the following reasons: a) the formula overrates completion percentage by
effectively double-counting it by also using yards per attempt instead
of yards per completion, b) the formula strictly measures overall
"efficiency" without regard to number of attempts. It stands to reason
that a QB will be more efficient the _less_ he has to throw if he can
pick his spots behind a good running game. Without a doubt Bledsoe is
in the worst situation possible in the entire NFL as far as "efficiency"
goes.
Somehow someway Marshall Faulk was given a starting RB spot. Maybe has
something to do with the fact that he leads the AFC in total offense...
;-)
glenn
|
9.2958 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELS | Fri Dec 16 1994 11:56 | 16 |
|
Qb's are rated on the following stat's
Attempts
Compeltions
Pct Comp
Total Yards
Ave yards
Td's
Longest pass comp
Int's
example
att com %com tot ave td long int rate
S. Young 419 292 69.7 3525 8.41 31 69 9 110.9
|
9.2959 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:13 | 15 |
|
>> Somehow someway Marshall Faulk was given a starting RB spot. Maybe has
>> something to do with the fact that he leads the AFC in total offense...
Faulk benefitted just as Bledsoe did from injuries to better players
and a dearth of good players at his position. Contrast and compare
Barry Sanders, Emmitt Smith and Jerome Bettis to Natrone Means, Marshall
Faulk and Chris Warren. After all of the hype about Marshall from folks
who really hadn't seen enough of him to form and opinion, the actual
product has produced a meager three 100+ yard rushing games behind a
very good offensive line. We didn't here the kind of remarks posted
above after Marshall appeared on tv here in New England because he
was decidedly mediocre. My man Erric Rhett is looking at like a much
better value draft-wise.
|
9.2960 | another vote for Rhett | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:18 | 13 |
| I've only seen Faulk on clips except for the Pats game. Saying he was
mediocre is being charitable. Mostly, when he was needed to gain some key
yardage he dint.
Faulk also benefitted greatly from some long runs. His average run is
just that, average. And fer sure his team doesn't help his cause.
You gotta like Rhett. Like Faulk, he became the real go to guy. Unlike
Faulk, he delivers consistently. I think Tampa Bay may have found a
formula with Erickson at QB, Dilfer on the Pine and a whole lot of Eric
Rhett.
TTom
|
9.2961 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:23 | 1 |
| Too bad I don't have NFL stats online. I'd settle this debate too.
|
9.2962 | Give it up Tommy; he's a player... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:25 | 20 |
|
> My man Erric Rhett is looking at like a much better value draft-wise.
Better value, maybe, to the extent that something like that can be
qualified. Better player, no (when it was all said and done Rhett
did get his carries, and a 3.6 average to Faulk's 4.0 -- but Faulk
just might become the best pass-catching back in the league if he's
not already).
The Patriots shut Faulk down, no question about it. They've been
shutting everyone down lately, including the other AFC starter Natrone
Means. No, neither is in the class of Sanders or Smith (Bettis isn't
having too good a season though). The question still remains how a
player can lead the AFC in offense based on hype, or how that
performance can be nullified by the performance in two games seen in
New England (I didn't say a thing when the guy was running roughshod
over Seattle or Cincinnati in recent weeks, either).
glenn
|
9.2963 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:45 | 19 |
|
Marshall is a nice back with flashes of speed and he'll
occasionally break a long one. Worth the number two pick
in the draft? Maybe in this past one which might go down
as one of the weakest (if not THE weakest) ever but I see
exactly what Parcells meant when he was asked if he'd draft
Faulk at the number 5 spot if Marshall was still there. Bill
said that the RB spot was always one of the strongest in the
draft. Someone (you) once said that Drew and Marshall could
be the next Troy and Emmitt. Rhett resembles Emmitt more than
Marshall does. He's a Florida back who was relatively unher-
alded. He's durable, he follows his blocks well and he *can*
catch quite well. Why he hasn't been thrown the ball more, I
don't know. I haven't been able to see Tampa play this year.
When all is said and done, he'll match up quite favorably with
Marshall. He's already matched him in 100+ yard games and his
192 yard game is the Tampa Bay record and in the top five all
time for rookies.
|
9.2964 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:47 | 7 |
| We had the QB rating formula in some version of Sprots, a while back.
It's one man's guess at a way to rate qb's, and the formula has changed
over the years. It is not the be all, end all, which was my point in
regard to Aikman. Not that Aikman has fallen behind Favre, I assume
Cad will agree.
brews
|
9.2965 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:48 | 8 |
| >> (I didn't say a thing when the guy was running roughshod over
>> Seattle or Cincinnati in recent weeks, either).
Why would you? They're the number 24 and 22 defenses against the
run. His other big game came against Houston who is number 28 -
dead last. To paraphrase TTom, his average performance is pretty
average.
|
9.2966 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELS | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:51 | 17 |
|
These are the AP stats.
Warren of Seattle leads the AFC in total yards from scrimage with
1668 1362 rush 306 recieve.
Faulk is second 1623 1136 487
Means is third 1427 1192 235
Sander is first in NFC with 1919 total 1721 rush 198 recieving
Smith #2 1730 1410 320
Rhett is 16th in the NFC
|
9.2967 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELS | Fri Dec 16 1994 12:58 | 9 |
|
Re Aikman vs Farve.
Until a few weeks ago Troy made very few mistakes. I can't say that
about Farve yet. He is getting better about not throwing in double and
triple coverage just to complete a pass to Sharpe.
I do agree the rating system has it's flaws, but what else dow you
use. Win/loss record? or the Pro Bowl selection?
|
9.2968 | Jerome Bettis #36 | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Fri Dec 16 1994 13:04 | 8 |
| How many more years does Jerome Bettis have left on his contract
in L.A./St.Louis? Bettis was awesome as a rookie and he chased
Emmitt for the rushing title last year and he didn't have the line
in front of him like Smith did in Dallas. I hope for Jerome's
sake the Ram's invest some money into there offensive line or he
will be lucky to withstand 5 years in the league, even though
he has a 5'11 243 lb. frame. Wouldn't he look nice in a Pat's
uniform!
|
9.2969 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Dec 16 1994 13:07 | 3 |
|
Bettis who "isn't having to good of a season" has 970 yards
rushing for a truly stanky team.
|
9.2970 | Too few 100-yard games + averageness = 1600+ yards offense? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 16 1994 13:17 | 44 |
|
Okay, Chris Warren passed Faulk up in total offense last week. I'd have
no problem with him as the AFC starter over Faulk, with Faulk as the
backup...
Bettis has 900+ yards with a meager 3.3 average. Faulk has 1100+, a
4.0 average and catches the ball, yet you're not impressed. Both play
for stanky teams, with the Rams being worse but no more dependent on
offense than the Colts are with Faulk (less actually). Try and be
a little consistent.
> Someone (you) once said that Drew and Marshall could
> be the next Troy and Emmitt.
In reference to powerful QB-RB tandems, not based on style. None of
players resemble the other. Of course the Pats would still need
another 6-8 players get anywhere near as much out of their QB-RB as the
Cowboys do. And while Parcells may be right about RB depth, he still
doesn't have a good one. Maybe he'll get one in the next RB-deep
draft, maybe he won't. Right now it's a major team weakness. I
certainly think a Willie McGinest will be more replaceable than a Faulk
(or probablty even a Rhett for that matter).
> Why would you? They're the number 24 and 22 defenses against the
> run. His other big game came against Houston who is number 28 -
> dead last. To paraphrase TTom, his average performance is pretty
> average.
Contradictions abound. You don't like the low number of 100+ yard plus
games, yet when you add up the total numbers (and the 4.0 rushing average)
they're near the top of the league. That's consistency, not the lack
of. Take out the three games (even though plenty of other backs have
gotten to play these teams), and you're still talking about 1100+
yards of total offense in the other 11 games. You don't add up these
"average" performances and come up with a guy at the top. That makes
no sense. Pick one or the other (spectacular games or consistency),
not both.
And, regardless of what I've seen or said, I still didn't have a thing
to do with putting the guy in as the Pro Bowl starter in his rookie
season...
glenn
|
9.2971 | He's only a kid | SLICK1::MAILLOUX | | Fri Dec 16 1994 13:23 | 16 |
|
I don't think injuries had anything to do with Bledsoe being
choosen to the Pro Bowl. The kid deserved it just looked at
the stats he's produced. Granted the interception's are high,
but they don't take into consideration the tip balls nor the
blow pass routes that resulted in the pick-offs. The guy has
thrown for more yardage then the vaunted Marino, he set an
NFL record for attempts in a game and he's about to break the
overall pass attempts for a season, possibly Sunday. Take this
all into consideration plus the fact he should be playing in
some college bowl game, the choice was well deserved...
RM
|
9.2972 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Fri Dec 16 1994 13:23 | 27 |
|
> Bettis who "isn't having to good of a season" has 970 yards
>rushing for a truly stanky team.
I'm a little confused about how you determine which running backs
you like.
I take it you think Bettis is doing pretty with 970 yards so far,
on a poor team. But you less than enamoured with Faulk at 1136 yards on
a team which, IMHO, is in the same category as the Rams?
And before anybody compares team records, please be advised that the
Colts must of had the easiest schedule in the NFL this year. Their
non-division schedule was Seattle (twice), The NFC Central
(Houston & Cincy being the easy game of course), Washington, and
Tampa Bay. The best team Indy has beaten so far this year is
Buffalo (7-7). Everybody else has a losing record (Seattle-twice,
Houston, Cincy, and the Jets).
So why do you (apparently) like Bettis while not liking Faulk. Or
have a misunderstood your posts?
JimH
|
9.2973 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Fri Dec 16 1994 13:24 | 10 |
|
| Bettis who "isn't having to good of a season" has 970 yards
| rushing for a truly stanky team.
I saw the Rams-Chargers game at the Murph in November, and I agree
that the Rams are pretty poor on the front lines. Given that, and
that it was the only time thised season that I've seen him, Bettis
looked entirely ordinary against a Charger team on a losing streak.
=Bob=
|
9.2974 | I think it's an NFL Marketing Move. | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Dec 16 1994 14:37 | 16 |
| I'm not basing my opinion on the QB rating alone...I just grabbed whatever
evidence was easily available. To me Bledsoe is a promising QB with a
great future ahead of him, but he wasn't one of the top-3 QBs in the AFC
this year...based on any statistics.
As someone pointed out, his biggest statistical achievement is # of attempts,
and total yards passing. Why should a QB be chosen just because he has to
throw so much ? It's what he does with the ball that's most important,
and his completion % and # of interceptions is among the poorest in the AFC.
At first glance, relating # of INTs to pass attempts looks reasonable, but
then you have to acknowledge that he's thrown 26 INTs in 15 games, thereby
giving the ball to the oppostion more times than any other QB in the
conference, and more times than he's put it in the endzone.
Don't get me wrong, he's going to be king-QB in the NFL in the next couple
of years, but IMO he doesn't belong in the Pro Bowl this year.
|
9.2976 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Dec 16 1994 14:47 | 14 |
|
>> So why do you (apparently) like Bettis while not liking Faulk. Or
>> have a misunderstood your posts?
Jim, I like Faulk. He's a better than average back. But back before
the draft Glenn professed his undying love for Marshall after a
glowing article in the Globe and gave at least me the impression that
this guy was the next Barry. My position was that I wouldn't take him
especially not that high. My guy was Errict Rhett who was taken 34th.
I don't see Marshall being *that* much better than Rhett, if at all.
Flashier? Yes and more likely to break off the big one. But the trade-
off is durability and the ability to break tackles. I'm not convinced
that Marshall is a better pass catcher than Errict. I saw Rhett play
in college. The kid has very good hands.
|
9.2977 | Like I said, then and now, he's a player... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:09 | 18 |
|
>> And, regardless of what I've seen or said,
>
> This sounds to me like an admission that what you've seen (three games on
> local tv not just the two) has been unimpressive. You're right it has been.
> Silly me, I just go by what I see.
Will all due respect, that's a very limited and very poor method for
making such a judgment. There's a wealth of information and analysis
out there by people (including the Pro Bowl voters) who know a hell of
lot more about football than either of us. The best you can hope for
is to watch some games and keep up with the rest of it and try to draw
conclusions. To just say "nope, I'll go only by what I've personally
seen, locally" is shortsighted. Otherwise, we'd be forever obliged to
rely on the Sawmain's personal observations of Big Dan Reeves... ;-)
glenn
|
9.2978 | Thinking futures... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:13 | 14 |
|
> Our problem isn't the running backs. It's the run blocking.
I'd say it's both, with there being more room for improvement over this
season on the O-line with the current personnel. I think some of the
more inexperienced players like Todd Rucci are coming around. On the
other hand, I don't see either Leroy Thompson or what's left of Marion
Butts ever being enough to allow this team to be a championship
contender, unless there's huge improvement in other areas to compensate.
That's not to say that such a player can't be found, just that he's
not here now.
glenn
|
9.2979 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Fri Dec 16 1994 15:40 | 5 |
| > seen, locally" is shortsighted. Otherwise, we'd be forever obliged to
> rely on the Sawmain's personal observations of Big Dan Reeves... ;-)
But I'm tellin' ya, the guy cain't coach!!!!!!
|
9.2980 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Dec 16 1994 16:02 | 14 |
| > I merely pointed out that your "not too good of a season" is 970 yards
> on a truly bad 4-10 team. Meanwile Faulk has 160 more yards on a 7-7
> team with a pretty good offensive line. If there's any inconsistency,
> it's on your part.
I've read this twice, and still can't figure out what's so "pretty
good" about the Colts offensive line. From what I've seen (admittedly
bit a great deal), I wouldn't rate this offensive line highly.
Definately not in the top half of the league; at best only 4th in their
division.
Moreover, the Rams haven't been that bad. They have an awful record,
but nearly beat Atlanta twice, and have beaten a couple of pretty good
teams. Would a 6-8 record make them that much different ?
|
9.2981 | Is this right ? Is NO eliminated ? | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:59 | 138 |
| Here we go. Minnesota and Detroit have playoff spots all but wrapped up
(they miss out in 1 of 64 cases each.) Chicago is close (missing out in 2
of 64 cases.) Green Bay is in control of its own destiny, and could even
go in with a loss. New York needs help. Arizona needs serious help.
Okay, let's get the easy part out of the way!
San Francisco
-------------
D1.
Dallas
------
D2.
Everybody else:
Comments:
Ties are officially omitted from the NFC Playoff Picture. They would blow
my mind even further.
New York and Arizona cannot both go to the NFC playoffs.
Arizona can possibly get W1; New York can do no better than W3.
Minnesota clinches NFC Central with a win; Detroit clinches at least W1 with a
win; Chicago clinches at least W2 with a win; GB clinches at least W3 with a win
Minnesota, Detroit, Chicago, and Green Bay all have a chance to win the NFC
Central.
Minnesota could host any of Detroit, Chicago, Green Bay, New York, or
Arizona in the first round of the playoffs.
Detroit could host any of Minnesota, Chicago, Green Bay, New York, or
Arizona in the first round of the playoffs.
Chicago could host any of Minnesota, Detroit, Green Bay, New York, or
Arizona in the first round of the playoffs.
Green Bay could host any of Minnesota, Detroit, Chicago, or
Arizona in the first round of the playoffs (but cannot host New York).
NEW YORK IS IN if they beat Dallas and Green Bay loses to Tampa Bay.
Otherwise, NEW YORK IS OUT.
ARIZONA IS IN if they beat Atlanta, New York loses to Dallas, and (Green
bay loses to Tampa Bay or Minnesota loses to San Francisco). Otherwise,
ARIZONA IS OUT.
GREEN BAY IS IN if they beat Tampa Bay, or if (New York loses to Dallas and
Arizona loses to Atlanta.) Otherwise, GREEN BAY IS OUT.
CHICAGO IS OUT if they lose to New England, Minnesota loses to San
Francisco, Green Bay beats Tampa Bay, New York loses to Dallas, and Arizona
beats Atlanta. Otherwise, CHICAGO IS IN.
DETROIT IS OUT if they lose to Miami, Minnesota loses to San Francisco,
Chicago beats New England, Green Bay beats Tampa Bay, New York loses to
Dallas, and Arizona beats Atlanta. Otherwise, DETROIT IS IN.
MINNESOTA IS OUT if they lose to San Francisco, Detroit beats Miami,
Chicago beats New England, Green Bay beats Tampa Bay, New York loses to
Dallas, and Arizona beats Atlanta. Otherwise, MINNESOTA IS IN.
Tiebreaker situation:
New York beats Arizona (division).
Green Bay beats Minnesota beats Detroit beats Chicago (division, essentially).
Any NFC Central team beats any NFC East team EXCEPT: Arizona beats Minnesota
on the basis of Arizona's 17-7 victory over Minnesota in week 5.
First six columns are results of:
San Francisco at Minnesota
Detroit at Miami
New England at Chicago
Green Bay at Tampa Bay
Dallas at New York
Arizona at Atlanta
W is a win for the team at the top of the column, L is a loss, * is any
result.
Last four columns are:
NFC Central champion (D3)
Wildcards 1-3 (W1, W2, W3)
Mi De Ch GB NY Ar D3 W1 W2 W3
W W W W * * Mi De Ch GB
W W W L W * Mi De Ch NY
W W W L L W Mi De Ch Ar
W W W L L L Mi De Ch GB
W W L W * * Mi De GB Ch
W W L L W * Mi De Ch NY
W W L L L W Mi De Ch Ar
W W L L L L Mi De Ch GB
W L W W * * Mi Ch GB De
W L W L W * Mi Ch De NY
W L W L L W Mi Ch De Ar
W L W L L L Mi Ch De GB
W L L W * * Mi GB De Ch
W L L L W * Mi De Ch NY
W L L L L W Mi De Ch Ar
W L L L L L Mi De Ch GB
L W W W W * De Ch GB Mi
L W W W L W De Ch GB Ar
L W W W L L De Ch GB Mi
L W W L W * De Ch Mi NY
L W W L L W De Ch Ar Mi
L W W L L L De Ch Mi GB
L W L W W * De GB Mi Ch
L W L W L W De GB Ar Mi
L W L W L L De GB Mi Ch
L W L L W * De Mi Ch NY
L W L L L W De Ar Mi Ch
L W L L L L De Mi Ch GB
L L W W W * Ch GB Mi De
L L W W L W Ch GB Ar Mi
L L W W L L Ch GB Mi De
L L W L W * Ch Mi De NY
L L W L L W Ch Ar Mi De
L L W L L L Ch Mi De GB
L L L W W * GB Mi De Ch
L L L W L W GB Ar Mi De
L L L W L L GB Mi De Ch
L L L L W * Mi De Ch NY
L L L L L W Mi De Ch Ar
L L L L L L Mi De Ch GB
|
9.2982 | NFC situation simplified a bit (maybe) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:40 | 23 |
|
> Here we go. Minnesota and Detroit have playoff spots all but wrapped up
> (they miss out in 1 of 64 cases each.) Chicago is close (missing out in 2
> of 64 cases.)
The number of combinations doesn't reflect the odds, though. _If_
Minnesota loses to SF, any one of Minnesota, Detroit, and Chicago
could be out at 9-7 (all play tough games) if Green Bay beats Tampa Bay,
New York loses to Dallas, and Phoenix beats Atlanta. These are all
reasonable results. Phoenix would be the team that slips in ahead of
an NFC Central team, holding a head-to-head tie-breaker with Minnesota.
The Central team that would be out at 9-7 comes from the bottom of the
NFC Central tie-breaker stack which at 9-7 would be ordered (from the
top) as Green Bay, Minnesota, Detroit, and Chicago. All of these teams
better be thinking about deciding their own fate, especially the Bears.
The Giants' chances are not looking good at the moment. If they beat
Dallas, they need Green Bay to lose to Tampa. That one "choke" that I
was predicting nearly came about when Atlanta had Green Bay on the
ropes, but allowed them to slip free in the final seconds.
glenn
|
9.2983 | choke of the day: Dolphins | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Dec 19 1994 10:45 | 7 |
| The one choke job par excellence yesterday was the Miami Dolphins who
failed to score a TD at the Colts. Highlights of that lack of effort
included a sequence wherein Dan Marino and the Fish had 7 plays inside
the Colts 10 and couldn't put it in the end zone. Indianapolis wins,
10-6!
TTom
|
9.2984 | disgusted | SALEM::DODA | Stop global whining | Mon Dec 19 1994 12:38 | 11 |
| After that disgusting performance on Saturday, the Vikings do
not belong in the playoffs, period. They have no running game,
an average defense and QB who should be thinking about retirement.
The play calling SUCKS. I doubt they'll beat the Niners even if
Seifert pulls the starters at halftime.
There is no excuse for losing to a team coached by Fontes and
QB'd by Dave "You pick the comeback, I'll throw the INT" Krieg.
daryll
|
9.2985 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Mon Dec 19 1994 13:36 | 4 |
| From the local news, I can tell you that AZ goes if:
- they beat Atlanta
- both Dallas and San Francisco win
|
9.2986 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 19 1994 17:24 | 9 |
|
> -< Is this right ? Is NO eliminated ? >-
I don't think they are yet. They can still win the tie-breaker with
Green Bay at 8-8. I'm sure we'll hear about it tonight when Dallas
stomps them.
glenn
|
9.2987 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Dec 19 1994 17:26 | 5 |
| Don't forget, this coming weekend most of the NFL games are on Saturday.
The only game on Sunday (X-mass day) will be the Miami/Detroit game.
George
|
9.2988 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Mon Dec 19 1994 17:45 | 7 |
| Chances are good that this year's Super Bowl winner will be the first
5 time champ. The three top contenders, San Francisco, Dallas and
Pittsburgh all have 4 previous wins.
Just thought I'd mention it.
Jerry
|
9.2989 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Dec 19 1994 19:42 | 11 |
|
> Chances are good that this year's Super Bowl winner will be the first
> 5 time champ. The three top contenders, San Francisco, Dallas and
> Pittsburgh all have 4 previous wins.
But aren't only Pitt and SF undefeated in the Super Bowl?
I always wanted a Pitt/SF Super Bowl ("The Super Bowl King") at 4-0
each or Denver/Minny ("Somebody Has To Win!") Super Bowl at 0-4 each.
- Sean
|
9.2990 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Dec 19 1994 23:44 | 8 |
| How about Buffalo/Minny??
There are other teams that are undefeated in ths SB.
Jets,Giants,Green Bay, not sure about others.
The Crazy Met
|
9.2991 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Tue Dec 20 1994 07:56 | 4 |
|
Da Bears......also undefeated....
other non-winners: bengals 0-2 eagles 0-1 patriots 0-1 rams 0-1
|
9.2992 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:33 | 10 |
|
BTW - did anyone see the Neon Peon's torreador act when he waved
the Broncos RB (the smallest RB in the league) into the end
zone? It was about a fourth and goal from the five and the
Bronc's hand off to Iforgethisname and there's Deion between
him and the end zone. Instead of going for the stop, Deion
makes a half-hearted grab at the ball and steps out of the
way. Touchdown Denver. Deion's hitting ain't going to remind
anyone in SF of Ronnie Lott.
|
9.2993 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:38 | 4 |
| re: .2992
Saw that - outrageous. Sanders can cover anyone in the league, but
when it comes to hitting, he is the Jeff George of defensive backs.
|
9.2994 | | CAMONE::WAY | I'll miss you, Rak, my friend | Tue Dec 20 1994 10:50 | 5 |
| >Saw that - outrageous. Sanders can cover anyone in the league, but
>when it comes to hitting, he is the Jeff George of defensive backs.
As Hans and Franz would say "he's a little girly-mon!"
|
9.2995 | "Best cover man", no doubt, but... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:10 | 7 |
|
Deion's shortcomings in the area of tackling was the primary reason
cited by more than one analyst when the NFL put Rod Woodson and not
him on the all-time team at CB...
glenn
|
9.2996 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:34 | 1 |
| Nothing like the Bo Jackson - Brian Bosworth collision.
|
9.3000 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Tue Dec 20 1994 11:59 | 2 |
9.3001 | playoffs games and possibilities | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 20 1994 13:37 | 64 |
| Playoff Possibilities:
AFC EAST:
MIAMI 3� detroit
Miami (9-6) has clinched playoff; clinches division with win or
New England loss; clinches 1st round bye with win and San Diego
loss.
CHICAGO 0 new england
New England (9-6) has not clinched playoff; clinches with win or
loss by Raiders; clinches division with win and Miami loss or
tie; clinches 1st round bye with win and Miami loss or tie and
San Diego loss.
AFC CENTRAL:
SAN DIEGO 3� pittsburgh
Pittsburgh (12-3) has clinched division, 1st round bye, home
field for AFC playoffs.
CLEVELAND 10� seattle
Cleveland (10-5) has clinched playoffs; can host wild card with
win or tie or Raider loss or tie.
AFC WEST:
SAN DIEGO 3� pittsburgh
San Diego (10-5) has clinched the division; clinches 1st round
bye with win or tie and Miami loss or tie and New England loss or
tie.
LA RAIDERS 3� kansas city
Raiders (9-6) have not clinched playoffs; clinch with win or tie
or New England loss; can host wild card game with win and
Cleveland loss.
NFC EAST:
dallas 6� NY GIANTS
Dallas (12-3) has clinched division and 1st round bye.
arizona 3 ATLANTA
Arizona (8-7) has not clinched playoffs; clinches with win and
Dallas win and San Francisco win or Green Bay loss.
NFC CENTRAL:
san francisco 7� MINNESOTA
Minnesota (9-6) clinches division with win of with loss by
Detroit and Chicago.
MIAMI 3� detroit
Detroit (9-6) clinches playoffs with win; clinches division with
win and Minnesota loss.
CHICAGO 0 new england
Chicago (9-6) clinches playoffs with win; clinches division with
win and Minnesota loss and Detroit loss.
green bay 5� TAMPA BAY
Green Bay (8-7) clinches with win; clinches division with win and
Minnesota loss and Detroit loss and Chicago loss.
AFC WEST:
san francisco 7� MINNESOTA
San Francicso (13-2) has clinched division, 1st round bye, home
field for NFC playoffs.
|
9.3002 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:17 | 82 |
| Some of .3001 is not quite right.
>Playoff Possibilities:
>
>AFC EAST:
> MIAMI 3� detroit
> Miami (9-6) has clinched playoff; clinches division with win or
> New England loss; clinches 1st round bye with win and San Diego
> loss.
>
> CHICAGO 0 new england
> New England (9-6) has not clinched playoff; clinches with win or
> loss by Raiders; clinches division with win and Miami loss or
> tie; clinches 1st round bye with win and Miami loss or tie and
> San Diego loss.
Should be "clinches with win, or loss or tie by Chiefs"
>AFC CENTRAL:
> SAN DIEGO 3� pittsburgh
> Pittsburgh (12-3) has clinched division, 1st round bye, home
> field for AFC playoffs.
>
> CLEVELAND 10� seattle
> Cleveland (10-5) has clinched playoffs; can host wild card with
> win or tie or Raider loss or tie.
>
>AFC WEST:
> SAN DIEGO 3� pittsburgh
> San Diego (10-5) has clinched the division; clinches 1st round
> bye with win or tie and Miami loss or tie and New England loss or
> tie.
>
> LA RAIDERS 3� kansas city
> Raiders (9-6) have not clinched playoffs; clinch with win or tie
> or New England loss; can host wild card game with win and
> Cleveland loss.
also:
LA RAIDERS 3� kansas city
Chiefs (8-7) have not clinched playoffs, clinch with a win.
>NFC EAST:
> dallas 6� NY GIANTS
> Dallas (12-3) has clinched division and 1st round bye.
>
> arizona 3 ATLANTA
> Arizona (8-7) has not clinched playoffs; clinches with win and
> Dallas win and San Francisco win or Green Bay loss.
also:
dallas 6� NY GIANTS
New York (8-7) has not clinched playoffs; clinches with win and
Green Bay loss or tie.
NFC CENTRAL:
> san francisco 7� MINNESOTA
> Minnesota (9-6) clinches division with win or with loss by
> Detroit and Chicago.
Should be clinches division with win, or losses by Detroit, Chicago,
and Green Bay.
> MIAMI 3� detroit
> Detroit (9-6) clinches playoffs with win; clinches division with
> win and Minnesota loss.
>
> CHICAGO 0 new england
> Chicago (9-6) clinches playoffs with win; clinches division with
> win and Minnesota loss and Detroit loss.
>
> green bay 5� TAMPA BAY
> Green Bay (8-7) clinches with win; clinches division with win and
> Minnesota loss and Detroit loss and Chicago loss.
Should be "clinches with win, or losses by New York and Arizona"
>AFC WEST:
> san francisco 7� MINNESOTA
> San Francicso (13-2) has clinched division, 1st round bye, home
> field for NFC playoffs.
|
9.3003 | more | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 20 1994 14:29 | 36 |
| Not sure about the Chiefs part but the other stuff looks about right.
In any case, here's the records in the divisions, the conferences and
overall.
MIA 9 6 0 0.0 PIT 12 3 0 0.0 SF 13 2 0 0.0
NE 9 6 0 0.0 CLE 10 5 0 2.0 DAL 12 3 0 1.0
BUF 7 8 0 2.0 SD 10 5 0 2.0 PIT 12 3 0 1.0
IND 7 8 0 2.0 MIA 9 6 0 3.0 SD 10 5 0 3.0
NYJ 6 9 0 3.0 NE 9 6 0 3.0 CLE 10 5 0 3.0
PIT 12 3 0 0.0 LRD 9 6 0 3.0 DET 9 6 0 4.0
CLE 10 5 0 2.0 KC 8 7 0 4.0 CHI 9 6 0 4.0
CIN 2 13 0 10.0 DEN 7 8 0 5.0 LRD 9 6 0 4.0
HOU 1 14 0 11.0 IND 7 8 0 5.0 MIN 9 6 0 4.0
SD 10 5 0 0.0 BUF 7 8 0 5.0 NE 9 6 0 4.0
LRD 9 6 0 1.0 SEA 6 9 0 6.0 MIA 9 6 0 4.0
KC 8 7 0 2.0 NYJ 6 9 0 6.0 NYG 8 7 0 5.0
DEN 7 8 0 3.0 CIN 2 13 0 10.0 ARI 8 7 0 5.0
SEA 6 9 0 4.0 HOU 1 14 0 11.0 GB 8 7 0 5.0
DAL 12 3 0 0.0 SF 13 2 0 0.0 KC 8 7 0 5.0
NYG 8 7 0 4.0 DAL 12 3 0 1.0 PHI 7 8 0 6.0
ARI 8 7 0 4.0 MIN 9 6 0 4.0 BUF 7 8 0 6.0
PHI 7 8 0 5.0 DET 9 6 0 4.0 IND 7 8 0 6.0
WAS 2 13 0 10.0 CHI 9 6 0 4.0 DEN 7 8 0 6.0
MIN 9 6 0 0.0 GB 8 7 0 5.0 NO 6 9 0 7.0
DET 9 6 0 0.0 NYG 8 7 0 5.0 ATL 6 9 0 7.0
CHI 9 6 0 0.0 ARI 8 7 0 5.0 TB 6 9 0 7.0
GB 8 7 0 1.0 PHI 7 8 0 6.0 SEA 6 9 0 7.0
TB 6 9 0 3.0 ATL 6 9 0 7.0 NYJ 6 9 0 7.0
SF 13 2 0 0.0 NO 6 9 0 7.0 LRM 4 11 0 9.0
NO 6 9 0 7.0 TB 6 9 0 7.0 WAS 2 13 0 11.0
ATL 6 9 0 7.0 LRM 4 11 0 9.0 CIN 2 13 0 11.0
LRM 4 11 0 9.0 WAS 2 13 0 11.0 HOU 1 14 0 12.0
TTom
|
9.3004 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:38 | 7 |
|
> There are other teams that are undefeated in ths SB.
I know that...... I meant only Pitt and SF are undefeated in the
3 .2988 brought up as possible 5-time champs.
- Sean who replies in context
|
9.3005 | and more | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 20 1994 15:49 | 22 |
| W-L-T Home Away AFC NFC Div Next
-------------------------------------------------------
y-MIAMI 9-6-0 5-2-0 4-4-0 8-4-0 1-2-0 5-3-0 Detroit
NEW ENGLAND 9-6-0 5-3-0 4-3-0 6-6-0 3-0-0 4-4-0 @Chicago
x-PITTSBURGH 12-3-0 7-1-0 5-2-0 10-1-0 2-2-0 6-0-0 @San Diego
y-CLEVELAND 10-5-0 5-2-0 5-3-0 7-4-0 3-1-0 4-2-0 Seattle
x-SAN DIEGO 10-5-0 4-3-0 6-2-0 8-3-0 2-2-0 6-2-0 Pittsburgh
LA RAIDERS 9-6-0 4-3-0 5-3-0 6-5-0 3-1-0 4-3-0 Kansas City
KANSAS CITY 8-7-0 5-3-0 3-4-0 5-6-0 3-1-0 3-4-0 @LA Raiders
x-DALLAS 12-3-0 6-2-0 6-1-0 3-1-0 9-2-0 7-0-0 @NY Giants
NY GIANTS 8-7-0 3-4-0 5-3-0 3-1-0 5-6-0 5-2-0 Dallas
ARIZONA 8-7-0 5-3-0 3-4-0 3-1-0 5-6-0 4-4-0 @Atlanta
MINNESOTA 9-6-0 5-2-0 4-4-0 2-2-0 7-4-0 5-3-0 San Francisco
DETROIT 9-6-0 6-2-0 3-4-0 2-1-0 7-5-0 4-4-0 @Miami
CHICAGO 9-6-0 5-2-0 4-4-0 3-0-0 6-6-0 3-5-0 New England
GREEN BAY 8-7-0 7-1-0 1-6-0 1-3-0 7-4-0 5-2-0 @Tampa Bay
x-SAN FRANCISCO 13-2-0 7-1-0 6-1-0 3-1-0 10-1-0 6-0-0 @Minnesota
|
9.3007 | Shula and his golf cart weren't happy... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 21 1994 11:41 | 12 |
|
> Marshall Faulk fails to impress in yet another locally televised game.
> Four strikes and you're out Marshall.
Didn't see much of this game, but I did see Faulk put one heck of a move
on a Dolphins' defender to pick up the 1st down to keep the clock
running and the ball out of Dan Marino's hands at the end of the game,
thereby sending Don Shula into a bout of apoplexy directed at his D-
coordinator Tom Olivadotti. Worked for me...
glenn
|
9.3009 | So he's not "great" yet... BFD... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:08 | 21 |
|
>> Didn't see much of this game,
>
> I'm sure you didn't or else you'd have to concur that in four
> local appearances including this last one Marshall has been quite
> unimpressive.
Hard to say. I'd seen the other games and didn't completely agree with
your cynical assessments then, either. I did see that Faulk once again
picked up his 4.0 yards a pop. I don't know much but I do know that
that's the magic number for an efficient running game. Furthermore the
Colts controlled the ball well with the running game, won it (!) and
Faulk made a key play to seal that victory. And it's not like I'm in here
every week pumping Faulk as you say (he's exceeded my expectations; the
Colts and any other reasonable parties are very happy with him) or
giving weekly status/agitatus like "meanwhile, in a game Tommy Brydie
didn't see, Errict Rhett fell for 2.9 yards/carry against a pathetic
Redskins' defense". Because I don't care. It's gotten old.
glenn
|
9.3010 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:35 | 6 |
| Anyone else gain more appreciation this season for Barry Sanders now
that we've seen him play on local TV several times this season?
I have.
Mark.
|
9.3011 | yep | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 21 1994 12:42 | 11 |
| What impresses me most about Sanders is apparent disregard for personal
achievement. He doesn't seem to care if he scores, gains yards or
otherwise plays. How many other backs would agree to come out of the game
immediately after they just advanced the ball to the 2.
Now compare Sanders to Emmitt. Emmitt is hurting but he wants back in the
game. Why? He wants the record. Who cares if'n he does further injury to
his hamstrings hampering his teams chances in the playoffs. He's playing
for the record. Move him down the respect ladder.
TTom
|
9.3013 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Dec 21 1994 13:02 | 7 |
| | Anyone else gain more appreciation this season for Barry Sanders now
| that we've seen him play on local TV several times this season?
I have too. I've never seen a back who is so good at making a good run
when there is no hole. This includes Payton, Sayers, and Campbell.
=Bob=
|
9.3014 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Dec 21 1994 13:16 | 3 |
| See the spin he put on the DL from Minnie this past Saturday?
Mark.
|
9.3015 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 21 1994 13:20 | 12 |
| I'm confused about Emmitt Smith.
How do you know it's a matter of him being selfish and wanting the record?
Some guys just like to play and when a game starts they are like a Dalmatian
hearing a fire bell. Suddenly the pain is gone and they want to go into the
game just because there's people playing football and their not on the field.
Could Emmitt be one of those or is there other evidence that he only cares
about #1?
George
|
9.3016 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Wed Dec 21 1994 13:22 | 3 |
|
Emmitt said he just wants to get in for one play to keep the record
going. nuff said.
|
9.3017 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 21 1994 13:27 | 3 |
| What record are we talking about here?
George
|
9.3019 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 21 1994 13:33 | 7 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3018 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> Do your homework, George. Emmit has an 82 game streak going.
So is this already a record or is he trying to break one?
George
|
9.3020 | he/they said it | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 21 1994 14:00 | 16 |
| I cait figger how he thinks he got a streak. What about them games lasted
year when he sat out while his team played. How can they not count
against the streak.
The record that I was talking about was the TD record fo 24 in a season.
He's got 22.
As for evidence of selfishness, it's about the onliest thing the 'Boys
are talking about: put him in for 1 play to keep the "streak" alive; put
him in at the 2 a couple of times to get the TD mark.
It shore sounds like he's thinking a lot about records and precious
little about his team's chances in the playoffs. This game with the
Giants means diddly squat for the Cowboys.
TTom
|
9.3021 | Where sports is coming to | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Dec 21 1994 14:17 | 10 |
| sometimes there's direct money written in the contract or these kind of
worthless stats come up in bargaining both in the works of agents and
similarly lame-brained general managers.
I have read in baseball strike discussions that "stats" will have an
increasing importance in relation to salaries.
Also I heard on the radio something about a silver lining in baseball
strike discussion (feel free to answer this in the baseball or baseball
strike note).
|
9.3022 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Wed Dec 21 1994 15:37 | 10 |
| What day is Super Bowl Sunday, or "One for the Thumb for the STEELERS
DAY!!!"?????
Is is Jan 29th???
If so, I'm going to be one highly ticked off individual, as I just got
word I'm on call that day!!!!
JaKe
|
9.3023 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 21 1994 15:39 | 6 |
| I'm pretty sure that there are 2 weeks between the Championship games
and the SB which would put the SB on Jan 29th. But 'ya know it may turn out
for the best that you are on call if the Steelers don't make it that
far.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3024 | Sorry JaKe...but if Stillers are in work should be quiet, no? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 21 1994 15:42 | 9 |
|
> I'm pretty sure that there are 2 weeks between the Championship games
> and the SB which would put the SB on Jan 29th.
You are correct, sir...
glenn
|
9.3025 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Wed Dec 21 1994 15:46 | 16 |
|
Jake,
Start moaning and groaning now. The SB is always the last Sunday
in January. Which is the 29th.
Wild Card games will be December 31st a Saturday. They won't play them
on Sunday because the TV networks are obligated to do the bowl games on
the 1st.
Division games will be on January 7/8.
Conference Championship's on January 15th.
I thought they eliminated 2 weeks before the SB. So maybe the Bowl
is January 22nd.
|
9.3026 | But trust me, you've got nothing to worry about | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Dec 21 1994 15:46 | 5 |
| but the game don't start until 6:30 at the earliest and by the time
they've got bud bowl going, and all the rest of the garbage the "day"
is over and you're into night time, 7pm on.
And if you've got a 2nd shift I'd bet you'll get the last 30 minutes.
|
9.3027 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Dec 21 1994 15:48 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3025 by SNAX::ERICKSON "Time for Vacation..." >>>
> Wild Card games will be December 31st a Saturday. They won't play them
> on Sunday because the TV networks are obligated to do the bowl games on
> the 1st.
Since they went with a 3rd wild card they have been playing the #3 division
winner v. the #3 wild card games on Saturday and the two regular wild card
games on Sunday.
I believe a number of the college bowl games have been moved to the 2nd.
George
|
9.3028 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Wed Dec 21 1994 15:58 | 10 |
| WEll. on weekends, there's two peoples to cover standby fer the orifice
I work out of.
I'll be 50% of the crew fer that weekend. Lessee, shut the beeper off
2 minutes before gametime, chew lots of gum to hide the beer breath,
and turn the beeper on again minutes after the STEELERS beat the
sacrificial lamb from the NFC.
JaKe
|
9.3029 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:02 | 5 |
| I was under the impression that they did away with the two week
delay between conference championship games and the SB. No??
billl
|
9.3030 | no, yes, hope not | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:06 | 11 |
| Lasted year they did away with this break but they also had 2 buy weeks
for each team. The season took 18 weeks so there wasn't any time to have
this break in the playoffs.
Thised year, the season is 17 weeks so they put that week break back in
between the conference championships and the super bowl.
Personally, I like to see the byes and this week break go the way of the
instant replay.
TTom
|
9.3031 | Suck it up JaKe! ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:06 | 12 |
|
> I was under the impression that they did away with the two week
> delay between conference championship games and the SB. No??
That lasted for one year, after which the NFL abandoned its 18-week,
2-bye regular season that still placed the Super Bowl on the last
weekend in January even with the one-week wait, because the playoffs
started a week later too. It's back to the usual now, with the 2-week
layoff...
glenn
|
9.3032 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:09 | 8 |
| Some years (Bills-Giants) there has been only one week between the conference
championship and the SB; also happened with the 18 week season, I think.
re: playoffs - most of the major bowl games are on Jan. 2. Orange Bowl
is on Jan 1 because it is an 8PM start which is after the NFL playoffs
are over. NFL wildcard will have 2 games on Sat. 12/31 and 2 on Sunday 1/1.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3033 | maybe? | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:10 | 7 |
| Re: .-1
That makes sense with a casino advertisement I got in the mail the
other day. It made it sound like the Conference Champeenships were
on the 22nd. At the time I was wondering if the SB was gonna be in
February for the first time that I could ever remember... but I hadn't
heard about losing the 2 week break then.
|
9.3034 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:20 | 6 |
|
There were other years that had one week between the champ. and the SB that
were regular 14 and 16 week years; not sure why they only had the one
week break but it did happen in the 70's and 80's a few timtes.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3035 | Its a blessing jake... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:24 | 6 |
| Don't worry Jake....
It may be a blessing that you don't see the Stillers' on Superbowl
Sunday. The 9ers are going to thrash em.
Frank
|
9.3036 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Wed Dec 21 1994 16:33 | 8 |
| re.3035
Nah, when the STEELERS play in the Super Bowl this year, it will bring
ol' Vince's trophy back to the AFC fe rthe firsted time in many many
years!!
JaKe
|
9.3037 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:04 | 6 |
|
The Steelers vs. The Niners would have people fondly remembering
the Bills in the Super Bowl. It might be blessing in disguise be-
cause it'd be over by the end of the first quarter and we could all
concentrate on partying. Fortunately, the Steelers will have their
hands full just getting there and probably won't.
|
9.3038 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:04 | 1 |
| Fish/Niners part deux.
|
9.3039 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:05 | 11 |
|
>> The Steelers vs. The Niners would have people fondly remembering
>> the Bills in the Super Bowl. It might be blessing in disguise be-
>> cause it'd be over by the end of the first quarter and we could all
>> concentrate on partying. Fortunately, the Steelers will have their
>> hands full just getting there and probably won't.
And it would suprize many that the 49ers lost so bad, too.
JaKe
|
9.3040 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:05 | 5 |
|
Niners vs. anyone would have people fondly remembering Buffalo the last 3
times.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3041 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:10 | 7 |
| >> And it would suprize many that the 49ers lost so bad, too.
Keep telling yoursef that long enough and maybe you'll eventually
believe it. The reality is that Deion could probably outscore
Pittsburg all by himself. Like I say though, Pittsburg has to
get there first and with their offense that's no certainty.
|
9.3042 | What are the alternatives here? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:15 | 15 |
|
> The Steelers vs. The Niners would have people fondly remembering
> the Bills in the Super Bowl.
Who else has even a remote chance of slowing down the 49ers' offense?
There certainly aren't any teams in the AFC with offenses good enough
to attempt to get into a scoring duel with the 49ers, so the AFC might
as well send a team that'll try to bludgeon them to death with the
conference's best defense and best rushing attack, catch a few breaks
and maybe steal one. The Steelers are well-coached and disciplined,
too. I guarantee that no Steeler will forget where his helmet is
before the game even starts...
glenn
|
9.3043 | Offense sells Tickets, Defense wins Championships | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:32 | 20 |
| > The Steelers vs. The Niners would have people fondly remembering
> the Bills in the Super Bowl.
The following list is endless but here's a good start:
1. In '69 the Colts were supposed to slaughter the 18 1/2 point underdog
Jets. Now, everybody knows who Joe Namath is but nobody seems to
remember Earl Morral.
2. In '74, the Raiders n the Dolphins were clearly the best teams in the
NFL. The winner of their playoff game was expected to cruise to
a SuperBowl win. The Steeler's ended up winning the SuperBowl 4
outta 6 years starting that year.
3. Florida State was already ordained as the "team of the century" and
an 18 point favorite in last year's Orange Bowl. But it took every
bad call in the book to squeek out a win against Nebraska.
I agree, if it's a 49'er/Steeler Superbowl, the 49'ers should be favored.
But never ever underestimate the ability of a defensive power to
find a way to win.
Keith
|
9.3044 | here we Steelers, here we go. | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:43 | 15 |
| > The reality is that Deion could probably outscore
> Pittsburg all by himself.
yea, yea, Deion is good at covering receivers and taunting his opponents
after he makes an interception. But if he ends up playing the Steeler's
in the SuperBowl, he'll have to try tackling a couple of runaway freight
trains like Foster and Morris. The SF fans may wish they had Ronnie Lott
back there who could hit instead of a guy who doesn't like to get dirty.
If you compare Woodsen and Sanders, Woodsen clearly stands out as the
best player. Woodsen gives you the whole package of someone who can cover,
be a team player, return kicks, make the INT, sack the QB and knock a
running back flat on his back.
Keith
|
9.3045 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 21 1994 17:44 | 17 |
|
>> I guarantee that no Steeler will forget where his helmet is
>> before the game even starts...
That would be about the only plus for Steelers' fans. No one in
the AFC is going to beat San Francisco and certainly not a team
with the one dimensional offense of the Steelers. It wouldn't
be Vinny Testaverde and his bumbling friends that the Steelers
beat by a whopping 17-7. It's the most efficient QB ever leading
one of the most potent offenses ever with a very good defense to
boot. I'd rather see Miami or New England or the Raiders who can
at least provide some excitement on the other side of the ball than
the Steelers three and outing it to the Niners as the Niners run
hog wild. The Steelers ain't seen nothing like what the Niners can
throw at 'em. The Bills had the best defense in the AFC once upon a
nightmare, too.
|
9.3046 | I'll fax to any of you diehards | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Dec 21 1994 18:12 | 9 |
| I see that another one of our free wsj's had an article on
Steelers-Browns. Jake, Groaner; got a fax #?
Article indicated that browns got the best of it on the field but
miscues and penalties made the difference. Also, comments on city as
well as team rivalry.
Congrats to both of you for making the national finance daily's "sprot
page"
|
9.3047 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 21 1994 20:50 | 5 |
| But Dallas might beat SF. In which case I think the AFC has a better
chance to finally win a SB.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3048 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Wed Dec 21 1994 21:46 | 7 |
9.3049 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Dec 22 1994 08:14 | 20 |
| > If you compare Woodsen and Sanders, Woodsen clearly stands out as the
> best player. Woodsen gives you the whole package of someone who can cover,
> be a team player, return kicks, make the INT, sack the QB and knock a
> running back flat on his back.
>
> Keith
Woodson isn't a great cover man, and isn't anywhere near Sanders in that
category; Deion is probably the best cover CB in the history of the NFL,
and makes Woodson look very average in comparison (Woodson, as a cover CB,
really isn't much better than average). Woodson doesn't intercept the ball
any better, and in fact less often, then Deion. Clearly Deion is at least
a little, if not quite a bit better, at returning kicks. Woodson is a
far superior tackler and hitter, much more feared in other aspects of the
defensive game, and is also a far superior team player (although his
teammates have historically denounced claims that Deion is anything but
a good person to have in the clubhouse). Clearly Woodson is a great CB,
but especially so in the Pittsburgh scheme of defense. In a defense where
the primary responsibility of the CB is to defend the WR, Sanders is a
better choice.
|
9.3050 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Dec 22 1994 08:19 | 14 |
| > <<< Note 9.3045 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>
> That would be about the only plus for Steelers' fans. No one in
> the AFC is going to beat San Francisco and certainly not a team
> with the one dimensional offense of the Steelers.
I think both Dallas and Detroit might have something to say about SF
going to the Super Bowl. Moreover, I think that a power running team
like Pittsburgh stands a much better chance than Miami or New England.
Deion is just going to shut down the best passing option the opposing
team will have. Pittsburgh would have the best chance of just
plowing through the middle, and employing the basic style of offense
the Giants used in beating a very high powered Bills offense in the
Super Bowl.
|
9.3051 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Dec 22 1994 08:33 | 4 |
| Jake I find it hard to believe ANYONE who knows you, would dare call
you in IF the Steelers are in the super bowl. 8*)
Jimbo
|
9.3052 | Call me 'doubting Thomas' | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Thu Dec 22 1994 08:44 | 6 |
| Is this 49er team that everyone seems ready to crown as SB champs
the same one that looked like this year's University of Pittsburgh
squad a few weeks ago? I think they were playing the Falcons.
billl
|
9.3053 | Huh? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Thu Dec 22 1994 09:04 | 11 |
| >> <<< Note 9.3052 by MKFSA::LONG "Steelers...strivin' fer 5!" >>>
>> -< Call me 'doubting Thomas' >-
>> Is this 49er team that everyone seems ready to crown as SB champs
>> the same one that looked like this year's University of Pittsburgh
>> squad a few weeks ago? I think they were playing the Falcons.
Didn't the beat the Falcons something like 51-17?
Jerry
|
9.3054 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Thu Dec 22 1994 09:41 | 5 |
| The niners last loss was in their 4th game, to the Iggles, by a score
of 40-8.
JaKe
|
9.3055 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Dec 22 1994 09:45 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3043 by PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF >>>
> 1. In '69 the Colts were supposed to slaughter the 18 1/2 point underdog
> Jets. Now, everybody knows who Joe Namath is but nobody seems to
> remember Earl Morral.
Wasn't Johnny Unitis the QB for Baltimore back then? I seem to remember a lot
of talk from Namath about how Unitis was his hero and that made the game all
that much more important.
George
|
9.3056 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:04 | 18 |
| re 49ers:
Okay, so my memory isn't what it used to be...that doesn't make
me a bad person, does it?
It was actually the 49er-Rams game I was referring to. Sure the
49ers won 31-27, but if they sure didn't look like the 'all-powerful,
all-world, soon to be SB champs' to me.
That's not to say that every team doesn't have its bad games, but every
team is not be dubbed SB champs by nearly everyone before the playoffs
have even begun.
My point is that the 49ers are just as beatable as the Steelers,
Cowboys, Patriots, Dolphins, etc.
billl
|
9.3057 | Hell, these guys haven't even been tested recently | SALEM::DODA | Working on mysteries without any clues | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:04 | 12 |
| Billlll,
The Niners make a habit of scoring 50 points a game. When was the
last time the Steelers put up 50 in ONE game. Fact is, that's a
months worth of scoring for Pitt. The Steelers are good, but the
Niners are too much for any team. Cover all of Young's options
and he goes off for a 20 yd jaunt down the field. Leave one of
the options uncovered, he finds it. Stop Watters or Rice or
Taylor, or Jones, but you can't stop them all at the same time.
Not these days....
daryll
|
9.3058 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:08 | 5 |
| Daryll, last I checked a WIN by one point looks the same in the books
as a win by 50+.
billl
|
9.3059 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:08 | 10 |
| | Wasn't Johnny Unitis the QB for Baltimore back then? I seem to remember a lot
|of talk from Namath about how Unitis was his hero and that made the game all
|that much more important.
My recallection was that Unitas was injured in mid-season, and that Earl
Morril (sp?) took over. He led the Colts to the NFC champeenship, and
into the Supe. Late in the Supe, when the Colt offense was floundering,
Unitas was put in, but was ineffective.
=Bob=
|
9.3060 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:13 | 8 |
| re 49ers:
Just so no one gets the wrong impression...I think the 49ers are a
good team with their share of offensive weapons, but I also happen to
think they can (and will) be beaten.
billl
|
9.3061 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:20 | 8 |
| and in this case billl is most definitely an ObjectiveSportsAnalyst.
Best scenario is Dallas, NE, Pigsturd, Clevescum, Dolphins, Faiders being
eliminated as early as possible. There could then be sane discussion about
the playoffs for the first time in years.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3062 | some double results | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:32 | 15 |
| > The following list is endless but here's a good start:
Namath in 69: Unitas played in the second half of this loss and guided
the Colts to their onliest score.
FWIW, here's the results of dougle digit spreads:
I--Green Bay, favored by 14, def. Kansas City, 35-10
II--Green Bay, favored by 13, def. Oakland Raiders, 33-14
III--New York Jets, underdog by 19, def. Baltimore, 16-7
IV--Kansas City, underdog by 13 1/2, def. Minnesota, 23-7
XIV--Pittsburgh, favored by 10, def. Los Angeles Rams, 31-19
XX--Chicago, favored by 10, def. New England, 46-10
XXIV--San Francisco, favored by 12, def. Denver, 55-10
XXVIII--Dallas, favored by 10 1/2, def. Buffalo, 30-13
|
9.3063 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:46 | 5 |
| TC*, the discussion is already sane, your Jesters are history.
hth,
billl
|
9.3064 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:47 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3059 by CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH "Hakuna Matata - means no worries..." >>>
>My recallection was that Unitas was injured in mid-season, and that Earl
>Morril (sp?) took over. He led the Colts to the NFC champeenship, and
>into the Supe. Late in the Supe, when the Colt offense was floundering,
>Unitas was put in, but was ineffective.
That sounds familiar. One nit, the Colts had to win not only their conference
championship but they also had to win the NFL championship to get into that
game which they lost to the AFL champion Jets.
The merger which resulted in the NFC champion playing the AFC champion in
the superbowl didn't happen until after that season.
George
|
9.3065 | KC lasted of the AFL? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Dec 22 1994 10:51 | 9 |
| I think Kansas City beat Minnesota the lasted year of the AFL-NFL.
Also, in another little quirk, KC became the firsted Super Bowl winner
who didn't win their division. They finished second, won the western
playoff, won the AFL playoff and won the whole thang.
But of course, not all of them brain cells work like they used to.
TTom
|
9.3066 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Thu Dec 22 1994 11:22 | 2 |
9.3067 | ramblin' superbowl thoughts | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Dec 22 1994 11:23 | 10 |
| I thought that when the Raiders beat the Iggles in the superbowl,
they became the first team to win the whole thing as a wildcard entry?
Were the Chiefs a wildcard entry?
BTW, I've been a 9er fan for 30 years and while they should win the
whole thang this year...The Cowboys and Steelers do pose significant
problems. Especially on defense!!!
|
9.3068 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Dec 22 1994 11:25 | 2 |
| I'm pretty sure the score of KC-Minn was 23-7. Only the Broncos have managed
only a FG in the SB - (1977 season, 1978 SB ?) against Dallas
|
9.3069 | not wild | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Dec 22 1994 11:29 | 9 |
| KC won despite not winning the division but they weren't called a "wild
card".
The Raiders won it as a real wild card and Buffalo got there but lost as
another wild card.
Also, Miami mustered a mere FG in their loss to Dallas.
TTom
|
9.3070 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | IDRINKALONEWITHMYBUDDYJACKDANIELS | Thu Dec 22 1994 11:46 | 32 |
|
SCORES FOR ALL GAMES
SB I GREEN BAY 35 KC 10
II GREEN BAY 33 OAKLAND 14
III NY JETS 16 BALTIMAORE 7
IIII KC 23 MINNESOTA 7
V BALTIMORE 16 DALLAS 13
VI DALLAS 24 MIAMI 3
VII MIAMI 14 WASHINGTON 7
VIII MIAMI 24 MINNESOTA 7
IX PITTSBURG 16 MINNESOTA 6
X PITTSBURG 21 DALLAS 17
XI OAKLAND 32 MINNESOTA 14
XII DALLAS 27 DENVER 10
XIII PITTSBURG 35 DALLAS 31
XIV PITTSBURG 31 LA RAMS 19
XV OAKLAND 27 PHILLY 10
XVI SAN FRAN 26 CINCINN 19
XVII WASHINGTON 27 MIAMI 17
XVIII LA RAID 38 WASHINGTON 9
XIX SAN FRAN 38 MIAMI 16
XX CHICAGO 46 NEW ENG 10
XXI NY GIANTS 39 DENVER 20
XXII WASHINGTON 42 DENVER 10
XXIII SAN FRAN 20 CINCINN 16
XXIV SAN FRAN 55 DENVER 10
XXV NY GIANTS 20 BUFFALO 19
XXVI WASHINGTON 37 BUFFALO 24
XXVII DALLAS 52 BUFFALO 17
XXVIII DALLAS 30 BUFFALO 13
|
9.3071 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Thu Dec 22 1994 11:49 | 17 |
| > <<< Note 9.3067 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>
> -<ramblin' superbowl thoughts >-
Frank, tell those DECSALE people to get that KennyG crap off of the
music on hold. It's bad enough that you guys are all sitting on your
collective asses doing nothing while we wait on hold, but to play that
junk in hopes that we'll hang up rather than have to listen to it for
45 minutes straight is downright inhumane.
BTW, while no one was looking, or those who bought it up earlier were
ignoring it, the NFC now has a better record than the AFC, they passed
them by a few weeks ago, and have steadily built up a bigger edge as
the games got more important. Little doubt again as to which
conference is stronger.
brews
|
9.3072 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Thu Dec 22 1994 11:55 | 4 |
9.3073 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Thu Dec 22 1994 12:27 | 4 |
|
Yer wrong on that Donk score TCM....
Claybone
|
9.3074 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Dec 22 1994 12:37 | 5 |
|
yeah, I knew it was against Dallas, got the opponent wrong. Figured with
Denver I would have one of the best shots.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3075 | AFC has much more depth | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | We're 4th and movin' up! | Thu Dec 22 1994 13:40 | 20 |
| Brews, you are so wrong it ain't funny. Seven of the top ten teams in
the NFL are in the AFC. Unfortunately the two strongest teams by far
are in the NFC. So while the AFC has lots of very good teams, they
will not win a Super Bowl until one of those very good teams can step
up to the next level.
IMO, here are the top ten teams in the NFL:
1. San Francisco
2. Dallas
3. Pittsburgh
4. Miami
5. Cleveland
6. New England
7. LA Raiders
8. Kansas City
9. Detroit
10. San Diego
NAZZ
|
9.3076 | This one is for Brews | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Dec 22 1994 13:44 | 9 |
| Brews...
Listen here, that music is supposed to tranquilize you sales types.
Everyone knows that you have personalities of sandpaper. On a serious
side...My christmas wish for you is for "Big" Dan to win just enough
games to keep him permanently the coach of the Gints.
Frank "hold please" Mendez
|
9.3077 | Head to Head dontcha know!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DA BEARS!!!! | Thu Dec 22 1994 13:50 | 6 |
|
Small nit Nazz
Make Raiders #6
Pats #7
|
9.3078 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Thu Dec 22 1994 14:34 | 2 |
9.3079 | But We'll see | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | DA BEARS!!!! | Thu Dec 22 1994 14:35 | 3 |
|
RECORD WISE Right now!!!
|
9.3080 | dance to the music | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Dec 22 1994 14:48 | 11 |
| Hey Frank,
I don't mind that music. I just make sure I have a window open for
::SPROTS so I have something to do while I wait. ;-)
BTW, did I tell you that someone in your group called me to see if'n I
liked the support I was getting. In true suck-up fashion I said you was
all good, especially that Mendez fella and that there Riggens guy. Y'all
can thank me for that big raise you got.
TTom
|
9.3081 | Ramblings | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | God cares. | Thu Dec 22 1994 15:31 | 24 |
| Patriots were a wild card as well. Won at Jets, won at Raiders,
won at Dolphins.
Nazz, I agree there is more depth, BUT the degree to which the
49'ers and the Cowboys are superior carries the NFC over the AFC
imo. And to have the Dolphins 4th in the entire NFL!!! Man, they
just recently lost to the Bills who are what 7-8? They just lost
to the Colts 10-6!! Come on, if that's the 4th best team in the
NFL!!
At this point, I would have put the Lions higher and included the
Vikings (who beat the Bills recently). I'm biased, but I'd throw
the Packers in there too!!
The AFC teams are so one dimensional. It is scary for the best teams
to perhaps be Steelers, Browns. Their QB's and offenses are very
unimpressive.
But, I think the AFC's best chance are the Steelers or the Patriots.
The Steelers can maybe get lucky with that big play defense. And
maybe hold the clock. Liek one guy said, the AFC's best chance is
for the Steelers to pull a Giants type game (over Bills).
Tony
|
9.3082 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Thu Dec 22 1994 15:40 | 10 |
| With the Pats 3-0 over nfc and Bears 3-0 over AFC and similar records,
perhaps this game can be used to measure league strengths.
There is a scary nonchalance around Boston around this game which going
in seems very difficult, especially after the emotional victory last
week where breaks made it seem easier than it was.
Hopefully Bears are simply like Giants - able thru excellent coaching
to beat teams in their class but easy to beat for another well coached
team with talent - eg Dallas, eg Pats.
|
9.3083 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS, 1994 AFC Central Champs!! | Thu Dec 22 1994 15:54 | 9 |
|
>>The Niners make a habit of scoring 50 points a game. When was the
>>last time the Steelers put up 50 in ONE game. Fact is, that's a
Lasted time the STEELERS put up 50+ points in a game was against the
Brown(spot)s(tm) a coupla years ago. beat them 50-3, or 51-3.
JaKe
|
9.3084 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Dec 25 1994 00:20 | 23 |
| Lets see if I have this right. Chargers beat the Steelers, clinching
the first week bye.
Pats beat the Bears
Chiefs beat the Raiders
Cleveland beat Seattle.
If Miami wins they win the East and host KC, Cleveland hosts the Pats.
If Miami loses, Pats win the east and host KC, Cleveland hosts Miami.
First a q. about the NFC. In the case of Minnesota, Detroit, and
Chicago they could each lose and make the playoffs if the Giants won,
why? Is it because the Giants would win the tie break against the
Cardinals and then lost to each of the NFC Central teams?
In the NFC, Chicago, Green Bay, Detroit, Minnesota are all in the
playoffs. Chicago can no longer win the division. These 4 teams will
all be playing next weekend. Who plays where will not be finalized
until after the SF/Minnesota game on Monday since Minnesota wins the
division with a win. Minnesota cannot win the division with a loss
since GB or Detroit(if they win) would beat them out.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3085 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Dec 26 1994 11:12 | 20 |
| For a disinterested observer (as far as the teams go) the AFC playoffs
wildcard week has the dream matchup - Pats at Browns; the joy of seeing
all you Pats and Browns fans at each others throats for a week. I
expect to see some serious zingers, and p_name bets on this one
folks!!! Don't let down a fine ::sprots tradition.
KC at Miami is the other game.
Week 2 will have
If KC wins, KC at Pigsturd, winner of Pats-Browns at SD.
If Miami wins, Miami at SD, winner of Pats-Browns at Pigsturd.
In the NFC, if Minnesota wins tonight, Chicago at Minnesota, Detroit at
Green Bat. If Minnesota loses, Chicago at GB(div winner), Detroit at
Minnesota. You have to believe that both Detroit and Chicago hope
Minnesota loses; they both play on the road either way and this way
Detroit stays in the dome and Chicago stays outdoors.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3086 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 26 1994 15:42 | 9 |
| > In the NFC, if Minnesota wins tonight, Chicago at Minnesota, Detroit at
> Green Bat. If Minnesota loses, Chicago at GB(div winner), Detroit at
> Minnesota. You have to believe that both Detroit and Chicago hope
> Minnesota loses; they both play on the road either way and this way
> Detroit stays in the dome and Chicago stays outdoors.
Green Bay just destroyed Chicago both times; Green Bay is hot, while
both Minnesota and Chicago are fairly cold. I can't believe there is
any way Chicago hopes to play at Green Bay rather than at Minnesota.
|
9.3087 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Dec 26 1994 20:06 | 5 |
| Of course if Minnesota wins tonight that means they will have beaten SF
and I doubt Chicago would be thrilled about that.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3088 | Could they really be human???? | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Tue Dec 27 1994 08:42 | 11 |
| I know all those who were trying last week to convince me that the
49ers were the elite of the NFL, will say that the 49ers had all of
their third stingers playing last night, but I don't buy it. If this
team is really as deep as everyone likes to believe, the 'superior'
talent of this 'depth' should have crushed the sporatic Vikes.
Didn't quite happen, did it? In fact wasn't the score 9-7 Vikes at
the half with all the starters playing?
billl
|
9.3089 | Detroit can beat 'em, though | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 27 1994 09:01 | 11 |
| I hate to say this, but I still think SF is a far superior
team. I'd rather see Green Bay or Detroit come out of the NFC than
anyone else (SF/Dallas are my bottom choices of the 12 playoff teams),
but I believe the 49'ers have shown all year long that they
dominate in the second half. Mostly, I look at the detailed results
against the local team (the Falcons), where Atlanta was able to stay
close in the first half, only to get kicked silly in the second half.
I suspect that had the 49'er starting offense had played the whole
game rather than 17-18 minutes, the result would have been a lot
different.
|
9.3090 | | CSLALL::BRULE | go ahead with your own life leave me alone | Tue Dec 27 1994 09:24 | 5 |
| tcm,
I think Paul and Joe H are out for the week. So I don't know who's left
for the Browns?
Mike
|
9.3091 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Dec 27 1994 09:24 | 25 |
|
Well no team went 16-0 so they are all can be beat. Granted SF
is the favorite to win at this point. If you play a perfect game you
can beat them. Here would be my 4 keys to beating SF.
1) Ball control, you must have the ball 35-38 minutes. Keeping the SF
offense off of the field. Giving them the ball only 22-25 minutes.
2) The defense has to be patient and don't tip off the blitz to Young.
When Steve Young picks up the blitz and audibles. He audibles to
a play that will kill you. Most notable when you blitz a safety/
corner. They will put Watters in motion towards the side the blitz
is coming from. So they other corner/safety has to pick him up out
of the back field. Leaving the deep middle uncovered. Jerry Rice
then knows he has single coverage with no help in the middle. So
he runs a slant across the middle.
3) Turnovers, you have to force SF to cough up the ball. You have to
hold onto it.
4) DOUBLE COVERAGE on Jerry Rice on EVERY play. He kills you one on
one. Make Watters, Taylor, or Jones beat you, but not Jerry Rice.
Ron
|
9.3092 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 27 1994 09:56 | 26 |
| re: Niners
I haven't made a study of their roster, but my buddy in the Bay Area
explained to me the Niners' strategy:
They have loaded their front line with solid-to-spectacular players,
goign otu and getting Norton, Sanders, etc., but then signed basically
NFL: minimum guys as their second stringers. As a result, they are
cominant as along as the first unuit is together, and ordinary when
they play their backups. Lasted night proves that theory.
re: NFC 'offs
The Packers are hot right now. They have probably played the best ball
in the NFC outside the Niners for the past month. The Bears look
ordinary, as do the Vikes, at least without Moon. I was thinking that
the Lions were playing well, until Miami dumped all over them thised
weekend.
re: AFC 'offs
Go Pats. Boy would it be sweet to beat the Woofers. I've said before
that I think the Browns are the second best team in the AFC, but the
Pats are the hottest team in football right now, so it may happen.
=Bob=
|
9.3093 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Dec 27 1994 10:03 | 6 |
|
Is Hal around??
btw did Young eclipse Montana's record QB rating for a year??
The Crazy Met
|
9.3094 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 27 1994 10:05 | 3 |
| | btw did Young eclipse Montana's record QB rating for a year??
Yes, and then was promptly pulled from the game.
|
9.3095 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Tue Dec 27 1994 10:50 | 6 |
| I doubt Hal is around this week as Fab 6 is closed for the week.
Iceman may be in he's in the other building.
Pat's in a laugher!!!!!
Jimbo
|
9.3096 | just wonderin' | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Tue Dec 27 1994 10:55 | 8 |
| Does anyone have the seeding 1-6 in both AFC and NFC?
I thought I saw somwhere that if the Pats didn't win the division
they would go from ranked #2, with a bye, to #6. That would mean
after they beat the Browns they would play the Steelers, the #1 seed.
billl
|
9.3097 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 27 1994 10:57 | 6 |
|
If I could have chosen the first round opponent for the Pats, I would
have chosen the Browns or the Chargers. In fact, I'd rather be playing
the Browns in Cleveland than the Chiefs here. We're hot. They're not.
Our defense is playing the best it has all year. They've got Vinny
Testaverde. Nuff said.
|
9.3098 | seeds | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 27 1994 10:59 | 7 |
| NFC: AFC:
1. San Francisco Pittsburgh
2. Dallas San Diego
3. Minnesota Miami
4. Green Bay Cleveland
5. Detroit New England
6. Chicago Kansas City
|
9.3099 | so many questions, so little time... | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Tue Dec 27 1994 11:17 | 14 |
| re .3098:
Thanks, TTom. That explains some things that were about as clear
as mud before.
If the Pats and the Dolphins both win, it does look like the Pats
would go to the 'burgh and the Chargers would host the Fish.
Does anyone know for certian whether the Browns would be going to
the 'burgh if'n them and the Fish win? Or is there some rule about
interdivisional play before the conference finals?
billl
|
9.3100 | awaiting | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 27 1994 11:18 | 3 |
| Should be some good games, especially the Pats at the Browns.
TTom
|
9.3101 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 27 1994 11:19 | 12 |
| > Does anyone know for certian whether the Browns would be going to
> the 'burgh if'n them and the Fish win? Or is there some rule about
> interdivisional play before the conference finals?
There's no such rule any more. If Miami and Cleveland win, the Browns
travel to Pittsburgh for round 2.
When they moved to 3 wild card teams, they removed that restriction.
Suppose Minnesota had won the #2 spot and Dallas won the #3 spot.
Chicago defeats Dallas in the first round, and GB-Detroit winner also
goes on to the next round. There would be no way to avoid an NFC Central
2nd-round matchup, so the league decided to drop it.
|
9.3102 | notes collision | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Dec 27 1994 11:21 | 6 |
| The interdivisional rule was eliminated when they added a 3rd wild card team.
If the Browns and Dolphins win then the Browns go to Pittsburgh
and the Dolphins go to SD.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3103 | figurin' all the angles... | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Tue Dec 27 1994 11:47 | 8 |
| re last 2:
Thanks. I thought that was the case. Looks like the only way the
Steelers could play the Pats, before the AFC championship game, is
if'n the Fish and the Pats both win this weekend.
billl
|
9.3104 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Tue Dec 27 1994 13:28 | 15 |
| >TNPUBS::NAZZARO "We're 4th and movin' up!"
>
>-< AFC has much more depth>-
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Brews, you are so wrong it ain't funny. Seven of the top ten teams in
>the NFL are in the AFC. Unfortunately the two strongest teams by far
>are in the NFC.
Excuse me for basing my arguement on something as slippery as facts,
Nazz, but look at the interConference records. But once again, the NFC
won more games than the AFC. Add this to the almost certain SuperBowl
victory, and I can't see how you can object.
brews
|
9.3105 | NFL ALl Pro | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 27 1994 14:01 | 30 |
| All-NFL:
1st Team Offense 2nd Team Offense
WR Jerry Rice, SF Terance Mathis, ATL
Cris Carter, MIN Irving Fryar, MIA
TE Ben Coates, NE Brent Jones, SF
TKL Willaim Roaf, NO Lomas Brown, DET
Richmond Webb, MIA Tony Jones, CLE
GRD Nate Newton, DAL Keith Sims, MIA
Randall McDaniel, MIN Steve Wisniewski, Raiders
C Dermontti Dawson, PIT Mark Stepnoski, DAL
QB Steve Young, SF Dan Marino, MIA
RB Barry Sanders, DET Marshall Faulk, IND
Emmitt Smith, DAL Chris Warren, SEA
PK John Carney, SD Faud Reveiz, MIN
KR Mel Gray, DET Brian Mitchell, WAS
1st Team Defense 2nd Team Defense
E Charles Haley, DAL Reggie White, GB
Bruce Smith, BUF Leslie O'Neal, SD
TKL John Randle, MIN Chester McClockton, Raiders
Cortez Kennedy, SEA Dean Perry, CLE
OLB Greg Lloyd, PIT Ken Harvey, WAS
Kevin Greene, PIT Derrick Thomas, KC
MLB Junior Seau, SD Chris Spielman, DET
CB Deion Sanders, SF Terry McDaniel, Raiders
Rod Woodson, PIT Aeneas Williams, ARIZ
S Eric Turner, CLE Merton Hanks, SF
Darren Woodson, DAL Carnell Lake, PIT
P Reggie Roby, MIA Rick Tuten, SEA
|
9.3106 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Tue Dec 27 1994 14:01 | 7 |
|
Oh, and thanks to Frank and Jeff for that wonderful recording left on
my voicemail. Hopefully you've got that crap off your music on hold
(or at least you are answering the phone promptly, for once).
brews
|
9.3107 | Who chose these guys, anyway? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 27 1994 14:05 | 9 |
| | 1st Team Defense 2nd Team Defense
|E Charles Haley, DAL Reggie White, GB
| Bruce Smith, BUF Leslie O'Neal, SD
I don't get this one. In the games that I saw, nobody played better
defensive tackle thised year than Reggie White. All I can think of
is that it is because he missed a couple of games.
=Bob=
|
9.3108 | AP | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 27 1994 14:07 | 9 |
| This is the AP team so you can blame them.
The one for Green Bay that got jobbed was Bryce Paup.
Also, Barry Sanders was the onliest unanimous selection, getting a vote
on all 98 ballots. Steve Young was nexted with 96 votes with Marino
getting the other 2. Didn't anyone happen to notice Drew Bledsoe?
TTom
|
9.3109 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:10 | 8 |
|
If we're talking GB players that got jobbed, I'd say Farve has a beef
being passed by for fancy pants Dan and certainly the joke of the whole
mess, Fryar before Sharpe? Fryar before Reed? Fryar before etc etc....
haha
mike
|
9.3110 | popularity | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:18 | 10 |
| I heard over the weekend that Sterling Sharpe is gonna boycott the Pro
Bowl cause Favre dint get selected.
All of these votings are pretty much just popularity contests. It rewards
people for past performances and people like Marino are gonna get voted
cause most of these lame brains hardly heard of most of the other
starting QBs. It's a minor wonder that they're not all still voting for
Joe Montana.
TTom
|
9.3111 | Sean Jones had a quiet good year also... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:25 | 17 |
| re: All-Pro Packers
White - As I said, there was no more dominant player in defense that I saw.
Paup - I agree that he was at least one of the top two at his position
thised year.
Sharpe -Maybe the thinking was "awe, he always makes it, let's give
someone else a shot". He wasn't as good as lasted year, but
lasted year he was close to perfect.
Farve - Perhaps I'm a bit like 'Saw with Dan Reeves here, but I refuse
to beleive that Brett Farve is one of the two bested QBs in
football. Granted, he is improved from lasted year, but he still
makes too many mistakes.
=Bob=
|
9.3112 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:31 | 4 |
|
The other question is, how many All Pros can a 9-7 team have?
brews
|
9.3113 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:35 | 22 |
|
The AFC versus NFC was actually close this year. The NFC won by
essentially 1 game. It was something like 37-35 NFC over the AFC.
I think what NAZZ was referring to was the records of the 12 playoff
teams. There is a bigger margin between the top 2 and the other 4
playoff teams in the NFC. Then there is in the AFC. Also each
conference has 2 powder puffs (Houston, Cincinatti, Washington, Rams).
It should be an interesting playoffs. With SF the favorite and
Pittsburgh/Dallas right behind them.
1. San Franciso 13 - 3 NFC
2. Pittsburgh 12 - 4 AFC
3. Dallas 12 - 4 NFC
4. Cleveland 11 - 5 AFC
5. San Diego 11 - 5 AFC
6. Miami 10 - 6 AFC
7. New England 10 - 6 AFC
8. Green Bay 9 - 7 NFC
9. Kansas City 9 - 7 AFC
10. Minnesota 9 - 7 NFC
11. Detroit 9 - 7 NFC
12. Chicago 9 - 7 NFC
|
9.3114 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:43 | 3 |
| |MLB Junior Seau, SD Chris Spielman, DET
Y'know, the one SD game I saw, Seau was lined up as an outside LB...
|
9.3115 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Dec 27 1994 15:45 | 9 |
|
Bryce Paup is a pretty good player who is made a lot better
because he plays on the same line as Reggie White and Sean Jones.
If Bryce got the same attention as Reggie, he'd be pretty middlin'.
The one guy that I'd have to find a place for on my team is Tim
Brown. Certainly ahead of Irving Fryar and Terance Mathis if not
Cris Carter.
|
9.3116 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Tue Dec 27 1994 16:06 | 6 |
| While I agree with you rating of Tim Brown ahead of Fryar and Mathias,
Tommy, I have been impressed with the play of Cris Carter everytime
I see him play. Last night was no exception.
billl
|
9.3117 | Blowout is boring... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 28 1994 10:58 | 30 |
|
> I'd rather see Miami or New England or the Raiders who can
> at least provide some excitement on the other side of the ball than
> the Steelers three and outing it to the Niners as the Niners run
> hog wild.
We've heard this theme from the AFC for the last 10 years now, and have
had only two good Super Bowls to show for it, one of those from a team
in Cincinnati that inspired no one with any aerial brilliance but with
just a good old-fashioned running game behind a power back and general
all around competence. In their respective heydays Denver and Buffalo
(and also Miami in their 1980s appearances) were long on "excitement"
and short on ball control, with or without respectable defenses. It
may be boring but the best chance to beat the 49ers is to run the ball
on them. That might not be easy and it might be a longshot, but it's
still the only way.
The Raiders are already gone, thankfully. They're pathetic and would
have stood no chance if by some miracle they'd gotten there (Pittsburgh
kicked the crap out of the Raiders on their home field). It'll be fun
to follow the Patriots as they go as far as they can, but can anyone
seriously envision anything but absolute carnage if they were to take
the field against the 49ers, having to throw on almost every down in
order to move the ball? Miami is slightly more solid but not by much.
To me a reasonably close game for the longest possible time (like at
least until halftime) is more entertaining than any romp, no matter
how close to the vest the game is played.
glenn
|
9.3118 | | SALEM::DODA | Go Speed Racer, GO! | Wed Dec 28 1994 11:02 | 10 |
| Right-o Billll,
Who knew that Grebac and Singleton would have an off night.
Of course, Pitt lost to the misChargers. What's the spin on that
one?
Puh-lease.
daryll
|
9.3119 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 28 1994 11:22 | 15 |
|
>> We've heard this theme from the AFC for the last 10 years now,
Not really. Generally, what we've heard is that SB will be a blowout
and they have with one exception and that was Buffalo with it's gimmicky
no-huddle offense. What we've seen is an NFC with a dominating defense
and a balanced offense whup up on inferior AFC teams. For my money, I
don't even expect the Steelers to make it to the SB. Give Dan Marino
a second crack at that Blitzburg defense and it won't be pretty. Joe
Montna or Drew Bledsoe could probably put enough points (won't have to
be many) to beat the Steelers. But if they did make it, (God forbid)
and Seiffert and Young had two weeks to prep for the Steelers, it'd be
just another boring blowout. SF would have no problem playing man cov-
erage , overplaying the run and daring Pittsburg to throw.
|
9.3120 | must be those awsome Vikes! | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Dec 28 1994 11:34 | 15 |
| re .3118
Try to keep up, please. I never came in here and spewed mounds
of "Steelers are the prima donna team in the NFL" like others
have done with the 49ers.
The Steelers lost for the same reason the 49ers did. The other
team had more to gain by winning than the team that already was
a lock for the HFA throughout.
Guess it only shows that the 49ers put their pants on one leg at
a time, too. Go figure!
billl
|
9.3121 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Wed Dec 28 1994 11:56 | 7 |
|
well Tommy when the Steelers get there we'll have to have a p-name bet.
The only team in the AFC with a chance at them is the Pats. Marino
isn't even Jesus let alone God anymore and after a few hits on Fryar
and Ingram and co. his receivers will shortarm the ball.......
mike
|
9.3122 | | SALEM::DODA | Go Speed Racer, GO! | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:29 | 23 |
| Come on Billll,
The Niners pulled most of the starters in the 2nd qtr right
after the Young to Rice TD tied the game. They brought in Grebac
and the rest of backups and the offense went south. Coincidence?
Nope.
While the Vikes may have won the game anyway (but I doubt it),
the starters surely would've done played a better game that what
they had out there for close to 3 qtrs.
The Vikings had lost 9 of the last 10 to the Niners. Those 9
losses were to a team that was inferior to the team that the
NIners had on the field at kickoff on Monday night.
To take that performance and surmise that the Niners gave it
their best and lost anyway is a reach.
The Niners could still lose in the playoffs, but using the Monday
night game as an example doesn't scan.
daryll
|
9.3123 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | One More One... | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:32 | 7 |
| � Not really. Generally, what we've heard is that SB will be a blowout
� and they have with one exception and that was Buffalo with it's gimmicky
Make that two exceptions. Don't forget Cincinnati/San Francisco II
when Montana hit Taylor very late in the game to pull it out.
/Don
|
9.3124 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:33 | 8 |
|
>> well Tommy when the Steelers get there we'll have to have a
>> p-name bet.
I generally don't do p-name bets but this is like stealing.
I'll bet you on Pittsburg's first playoff game because I won't
be at all surprised to see them lose that unless something
fluky happens and they end up playing Cleveland.
|
9.3125 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:34 | 12 |
| <<< Note 9.3124 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
>> well Tommy when the Steelers get there we'll have to have a
>> p-name bet.
> I generally don't do p-name bets but this is like stealing.
> I'll bet you on Pittsburg's first playoff game because I won't
> be at all surprised to see them lose that unless something
> fluky happens and they end up playing Cleveland.
that's fine with me........
|
9.3126 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:35 | 10 |
| Wasn't the 49ers' starting secondary playing deep into the third
quarter?
It was never my intention to use Monday night's game as proof that
the 49ers would not win the SB. It was merely to point out to
some that the team is not as deep in talent as some in here would
like us to believe.
billl
|
9.3128 | | SALEM::DODA | Go Speed Racer, GO! | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:48 | 4 |
| With the salary cap and free agency, no team carries the depth
they used to. Stan Gelbaugh played last weekend!
daryll
|
9.3129 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:49 | 13 |
| >> I'll bet you on Pittsburg's first playoff game because I won't
>> be at all surprised to see them lose that unless something
>> fluky happens and they end up playing Cleveland.
By "fluky" do you mean like the favorites winning this weekend?
Unless I've got it screwed up again (I know it's entirely
possible) if Cleveland (#4 seed) beats the Pats, and the
'fins (#3 seed) beat the Chiefs, that's exactly what will
happen. Browns go to the 'burgh and the fish goe to SD.
hth
billl
|
9.3130 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:51 | 8 |
| >> when Montana was there. What's been said here is that Pittsburg
>> couldn't give the Niners a game.
I, for one, hope that PittsburgH gets the opportunity to
serve you up some delicious crow.
billl
|
9.3131 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:55 | 5 |
|
Don't know about the rest of SF defense. I do no that
Deion played only the 1st quarter if that.
Ron
|
9.3132 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Dec 28 1994 12:59 | 10 |
| >> Deion played only the 1st quarter if that.
I think you better check your tape. I didn't tune in until
just before the end of the first half and I was suprised to
see him still in there. In fact, the Wit-trips (Nit, Half and Dim)
on MNF even commented that Salisbury was trowing away from Sanders
aside from a few exceptions. That was in the second half.
billl
|
9.3133 | One or more of those teams will likely get their chance | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:09 | 13 |
|
If I had to make a call one way or the other, I'd probably have to
agree; Pittsburgh most likely won't give San Fran a game, at least
not a great one. The odds aren't too good. The question is which
team(s) from the AFC are capable of such. So Tommy, I understand your
position to be that not only are New England, Miami, and Kansas City
more capable of matching up with San Fran, but any of those teams also
match up well enough with Pittsburgh that they will beat them in Three
Rivers Stadium in the upcoming playoff games? If so, I'll take a piece
of that action...
glenn
|
9.3134 | Bleak in January too | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:21 | 10 |
| As Foster goes so goes Pittsburgh.
Homefield will be big come January weather. Teams like San Diego and
Miami (and K.C.) would appear to be at a disadvantage, though the
coldest weather I've seen was San Diego - Cinci and the Chargers played
tough though losing. Patriots and Browns can play in that weather
though the Pats haven't seen much of it this year.
Butts would be a big key for Pats at 3rivers and if it ever comes to
that it says here he comes up big time for them.
|
9.3135 | Pats are a very good team (considering there youth) | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:24 | 32 |
| Hey be carefull how you talk about those pats. There not as bad as
some may think... Like many have stated time and time again, Defense
win's championships. Parcells put together a very good defense who
in the first half of the season gave up alot of points and Bledsoe
threw A TON OF INT's. But in the 2nd half they went 7-1 and held there
opponents to low scoring in most outings.
Slowly they came up with more TAKEAWAYS then any other team in the
league, and there running game is still (Even after 16 games) UNKNOWN
butts doesnt seem to have it, but Leroy THompson, Sam Gash, Corie Croom
etc are all capable of having BIG DAYS, and lastly you got BLEDSOE, ya
he threw too many INTs but he also threw plenty of TD's and for MUCHO
Yardage...
The pats are one of the most exciting teams in the league
BLEDSOE 691att, 400cmp 57.9% with 25TD's (27int) and 4555yrds
Pats had 39 Sacks on the year, not sure where that ranks, 22 INT's.
Will be a very intresting Playoffs, I think there will be a few upsets
I hope Minny and Green Bay win this weekend, a Dallas VS Minnny and a
GB VS SF will make for some intresting matchups, in the afc Im not
going to say who I want, dont want to jinx anyone :-) but here's the
more then likely winners
PATS VS CLEVELAND CLEV
S.D. S.D.
KC VS MIA MIA PITT
PITT PITT
Hope Im wrong :-)
mab
|
9.3136 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:25 | 5 |
| | Butts would be a big key for Pats at 3rivers and if it ever comes to
| that it says here he comes up big time for them.
Butts cain't get out of the backfield on a clear day, what makes you
think he'd be able to on slippery, frozen turf?
|
9.3137 | Got's no good feelings 'bout Ohio;wish it was elsewhere | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:37 | 16 |
| Those earlier games where he was tackled in the backfield he didn't
even have a chance to move before being hit. This was a combination of
inexperienced (run-wise) line and qb (Bledsoe is very young, never
really played in a running offense).
In my observation Butt's strength is hitting the line quickly. He is
not "great" in terms of plowing thru hits but that is rare today. He
is tough, doesn't fumble and plays 60 minutes.
Now, Russell game them a lot more last year but depending on him was
always questionable. I am on record for criticing bill for not
resigning him; but that was never the criticism of Butts that I see not
only here but elsewhere.
Just trust me Bob, I pulled tcm's Ranger bacon out and I can do the
same for Pat's at Pitt. I just can't do anything about Sunday.
|
9.3138 | Sharpe out | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:38 | 13 |
| Just heard that Sterling Sharpe will miss all of the playoffs and that
his career is in jeopardy.
Turns out Sharpe has some serious neck injury that could lead to
paralysis or worse if'n it's reinjured. He'll take the rest of the year
off, be evaluated in the off season and then make a decision.
There's been a couple of these things going around, one of which was the
injury to the Hornets' Kenny Gattison who is not expected to play again.
Also, Marshall Faulk was selected the Offensive ROY.
TTom
|
9.3139 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:40 | 7 |
|
> Just trust me Bob, I pulled tcm's Ranger bacon out
Rght on with the sereis against NJ. But ......
well let's just say that you were a tad off about the Vancouver series.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3140 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:50 | 5 |
| re -.2 -If SHarpe is out GB is going to have a tough time going
anywhere in the playoffs. The physcological (and physical) loss of the
man is going to be tough to overcome, IMHO.
UMDan
|
9.3141 | might | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 28 1994 14:59 | 14 |
| That could happend, UMDan, or it could wake up the rest of the team.
Sharpe has been intermittent this year. I know how good he is and all but
he'd have all world games with 3 TDs, 100+ yds, 10+ catches, etc., and
then the nexted game would be a real no show.
Favre has to understand that he's the man. He has to be the one to get it
done. He'll try to run with Bennett but if'n that doesn't work out, he'll
have to carry the team with his playmaking.
And, of course, the D better understand that they caint count on the O
to score 30+ points.
TTom
|
9.3142 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Dec 28 1994 15:23 | 15 |
| >> So Tommy, I understand your position to be that not only are New
>> England, Miami, and Kansas City more capable of matching up with San
>> Fran,
My position is ANYBODY BUT PITTSBURG. Plain and simple. They're
boring, they'll get stomped and the Super Bowl will be anti-climatic
yet again.
>> but any of those teams also match up well enough with Pittsburgh that
>> they will beat them in Three Rivers Stadium in the upcoming playoff
>> games? If so, I'll take a piece of that action...
One lollipop sporting the p-name of my choosing is enough. Of
course, other arrangements could be made.
|
9.3143 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Dec 28 1994 15:29 | 6 |
| >>My position is ANYBODY BUT PITTSBURG. Plain and simple. They're
Hey Tommy, buy an H would ya.
billl
|
9.3144 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Wed Dec 28 1994 15:35 | 13 |
|
lollipop huh??? haha we'll see........
Sure seems to me that Bam Morris did just fine in Foster's absence. I
agree as Pitt's running game goes so goes Pitt but I feel that's more
of a reflection of the offensive line than the back as they've been
able to effectively run the ball no matter who the back was.
TTom, Sharpe had most of his bad games early in the year when for some
reason they were trying to diversify the offense. Once they realized
that Sharpe was the man and they had to use him they took off.....
mike
|
9.3145 | we shall see | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Dec 28 1994 15:43 | 6 |
| Yeah, Mike, there's no discounting the value of Sharpe.
I was just profering the idea that the team might just step up in his
absence.
TTom
|
9.3146 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Dec 29 1994 14:41 | 8 |
| Hope you folks enjoy the playofss and the bowl games this weekend. Just
realized that I may have a chance to wtch a few minutes here or there
but that until Monday late afternoon all 3 days are solidly booked.
Have a safe and enjoyable New Year.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3147 | Lacquer or Cheese-Whiz??????? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Thu Dec 29 1994 14:45 | 0 |
9.3148 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Thu Dec 29 1994 15:04 | 45 |
|
Not that these numbers mean anything, but here is the final
strength of schedule results. I find it interested that you have
4 AFC East teams in the top 10, with the 5th team being #28.
Its also interesting to look at where the Playoff teams are
listed. There are 4 teams in the top 10, 3 in the middle 8, and 5
in the bottom 10.
Here is the final strength of schedule.
Opponets
Records.
--------
Detroit 142-114
NY Jets 138-118
Cincinnati 138-118
Minnesota 136-120
Buffalo 135-121
Rams 134-122
Patriots 133-123
Houston 133-123
New Orleans 133-123
Miami 132-124
Raiders 131-125
Green Bay 131-125
Philadelphia 130-126
Washington 129-127
Denver 128-128
Chicago 127-129
Kansas City 127-129
Atlanta 126-130
Seattle 125-131
Tampa Bay 125-131
San Diego 124-132
Arizona 120-136
Dallas 120-136
Pittsburgh 119-137
San Francisco 119-137
NY Giants 118-138
Cleveland 116-140
Indianapolis 115-141
|
9.3149 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake! | Thu Dec 29 1994 15:35 | 4 |
| Waddle would probably say that's why the Jesters lost so many
games this year, too tough a schedule...
/Don
|
9.3150 | info | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Dec 29 1994 16:35 | 9 |
| some comings and goings:
o Bill Parcell - Coach of the Year
o Tim Bowman - Defensive ROY
o Flores - sh*t.canned
o Wade Phillips - gone
o Warren Moon - getting better
TTom
|
9.3151 | Vikes should win their firsted 'off game, beyond that ?? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Hakuna Matata - means no worries... | Thu Dec 29 1994 16:48 | 6 |
| | o Warren Moon - getting better
They said lasted week on the pre-game that Moon was almost certain for
the 'offs (as far as the Vikes go, of course).
=Bob=
|
9.3152 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Fri Dec 30 1994 08:30 | 14 |
| Coach of the Year:
1. BILL PARCELLS, New England 29 votes
2. Bill Cowher, Pittsburgh 25 "
3. Dave Wannstedt, Chicago 22 "
4. George Seifert, San Fran 14 "
5. Bill Belichick, Cleveland 4 "
6. Barry Switzer, Dallas 3 "
* 7. Dan Reeves, NY Giants 1 vote
* I didn't know 'Saw could cast a vote!
billl
|
9.3153 | ? | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Fri Dec 30 1994 09:22 | 3 |
|
Is SUPERBOWL XXIX being played at Joe Robbie Stadium in
Miami this year?
|
9.3154 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Dec 30 1994 11:17 | 4 |
| > Is SUPERBOWL XXIX being played at Joe Robbie Stadium in
> Miami this year?
NO, it will be played next year, in January of 1995.
|
9.3155 | ideally | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Dec 30 1994 11:30 | 11 |
| this year vs this season vs nexted year:
Football is confusing about what it calls a year. In January of 95 they
settle the 94 season.
I think someone is trying to tell us that football should be finished by
the end of the real year. With baseball and hockey folding, maybe we can
move football to July and give it through December. Then let basketball
start after the 1st and last through June.
TTom
|
9.3156 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Sat Dec 31 1994 21:36 | 12 |
| My predictions for Saturday's games:
Green Bay will hold Barry Sanders to negative yards rushing, and
will hold off Detroit with a first-and-goal with under 2 minutes
to play to go to 8-0 in the history of the franchise in playoff
games at Lambeau Field.
Kansas City and Miami will each score on their first three possessions,
using all but 22 seconds of the first half in doing so. Miami
will score on its next two possessions, and Kansas City's three
veterans (Montana, Allen, and Thomas) will make colossal mistakes
in the fourth quarter to seal the Miami victory.
|
9.3157 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I JUST LOVE THOSE STEELERS! | Sat Dec 31 1994 22:10 | 5 |
9.3158 | Sometimes Hindsight Not 20/20! | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Mon Jan 02 1995 12:20 | 4 |
| The past wasn't perfectly predicted!
It was Detroit 1st and 10 at the Green Bay 14 yard line with
less than 2 minutes to play. It was never 1st and goal.
|
9.3159 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake! | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:09 | 4 |
| Other than the Bears/49ers the other three games should be close
and entertaining this weekend.
/Don
|
9.3160 | who's gonna show up | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:18 | 10 |
| > Other than the Bears/49ers the other three games should be close
> and entertaining this weekend.
So Slasher, you're saying that da Bears will kick 49er butt like they did
up MrT way? I don't know, unlike the gimpy offense o' the Vikings, Young,
Rice, et.al., might be able to score. ;-)
Another possible question: which Cowboys team gonna show up in Dallas?
TTom
|
9.3161 | Go Pack! Quick Analysis | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:25 | 20 |
| re: .3159
What with Sharpe out, that is quite a salute to my beloved
Pack! I think the spread (10 pts.) is where it belongs,
but when you're a fan you always have hope.
Smith had 133 yards rushing and 95 receiving in the Thanks-
giving matchup. I am hopeful that the Pack can hold him to
an offensive total of 60 to 70 yards. That'll be tough with
the Cowboys o-line. Also, Dallas will try to do a job on the
Pack's 'smurf' corners. Not sure how the Pack can counter that.
Harper can probably get 2 feet above Buckley. Thats tough.
One of the more pessimistic outlooks is a Packer defense that
is just plain too tired in the 4th quarter and begins to just
get pushed around. Especially with the high possibility of
the Pack's offense not having a lot of time of possession, i.e.
22 rushing yards in the Thanksgiving encounter.
Tony
|
9.3162 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 12:30 | 10 |
| Well it appears that once again both #3 wild cards have gone out in the 1st
round.
Anyone got the stats on the best finish for a #3 wild card? Seems a couple
or few years back the Falcons won the 1st round then lost in Washington the
next week.
They seem to lose the 1st game most the time.
George
|
9.3163 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:16 | 15 |
|
> Well it appears that once again both #3 wild cards have gone out in the 1st
>round.
The Chicago Bears (#3 Wildcard Team in the NFC) beat the Vikings,
the last time I checked....
JimH
|
9.3164 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:23 | 13 |
| RE<<< Note 9.3163 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> The Chicago Bears (#3 Wildcard Team in the NFC) beat the Vikings,
> the last time I checked....
Wasn't that a wild card game?
I thought the #3 division winners hosted the #3 wild cards on Saturday and
the regular wild card games were on Sunday.
At least that's the way they did it in the past.
George
|
9.3165 | But "mediocre" Bryce Paup had a pretty good game Saturday... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:35 | 11 |
| re: Pack
Their rushing game looked better against the Lions. Bennett
is doing OK, but Cobb is still nothing.
As a Packer fan, I was hoping that the next matchup would
be with just about anyone except Dallas. No matter who
they put on the field, the Cowboys seem to have the Pack's
number.
=Bob=
|
9.3166 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:43 | 13 |
|
>Wasn't that a wild card game?
>
>I thought the #3 division winners hosted the #3 wild cards on Saturday and
>the regular wild card games were on Sunday.
Nope. Viks were the NFC Central Champs, the Bears the #3 wildcard
team.
JimH
|
9.3167 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 13:57 | 11 |
| RE<<< Note 9.3166 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> Nope. Viks were the NFC Central Champs, the Bears the #3 wildcard
> team.
Ok, so the Bears are still alive and I believe Atlanta managed a 2nd round
loss to the Redskins a few years back.
Any better finishes for a #3 wild card team?
George
|
9.3168 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:08 | 7 |
|
The year the Patriots went to the Super Bowl. I believe they were
the lowest seed in the playoffs. They won games @Jets, @Raiders, @Miami
to advance to the Super Bowl. I believe there were only 2 wildcard
teams instead of 3.
Ron
|
9.3169 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:34 | 12 |
| Yes I realize that. They were the #2 wild card.
I'm particularly interested in the #3 wild card. I've noticed that since it
was instituted a few years ago, #3 wild cards have done very poorly, usually
losing in the 1st round.
Funny thing is that I wouldn't have expected that. With the unbalanced
schedules and weak divisions it seems that very weak #3 division winners would
be fairly common and that #3 wild cards should be up around .500 in the 1st
round but it doesn't seem to be the case.
George
|
9.3170 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake! | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:55 | 5 |
| The #3 wild card team was added so the NFL could siphon more
money from the networks by offering them two more "playoff" games.
Not surprising they've done so poorly.
/Don
|
9.3171 | < .500 makes sense | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:08 | 6 |
|
Even if the #3 wildcard plays a weak division winner, the odds are fairly
good that they at best are about even with the division winner. Home field
would then give the division winner the extra edge they need to win the game.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3172 | Current system could be improved | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Wed Jan 04 1995 12:19 | 29 |
| Tcm is right. There was very little difference in #3 wildcard vs #2,#3
nor between wildcard and Division champ (Miami and Pats had same
record).
The difference often comes with home-field and in many cases with
top-heavy dominance. Given some very good Patriot teams in late 70s
and only two appearances in playoffs I like to see more teams in the
dance.
K.C. was #3 and even without home-field needed bad luck and
questionable officiating to lose.
But I'd stay with the 6 teams but possibly consider a playoff scenario
instead of the wierd tie breaker rules. Of if 8 teams qualify pre-tb
then go with 8 instead of 6.
Also, four central teams shouldn't have qualified, only three + the
Giants. An elimination of divisional ties should have preceded the
final tie-breaker.
And finally, Conference record merely is the reverse of non-conference
which says wins vs AFC (by nfc and vv) count less. Since the idea is
to beat the other conference these perhaps should count more or at
least the same. Beating the Browns and losing to Detroit cost the
Giants the playoffs which is ironic (vv and they get in, Right?).
b
|
9.3173 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Wed Jan 04 1995 15:31 | 3 |
| Is this the first time the NFC East hasn't had a wildcard?
brews
|
9.3174 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Canes and Hoyas,Canes and Hoyas | Wed Jan 04 1995 15:43 | 8 |
|
WCs started in 78.
In 87 they had no WC as Minny and NO were the 2!
88 Minny and the Rams.
I believe thats it!!
|
9.3175 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Jan 04 1995 15:46 | 10 |
|
Are you sure about 1978?? There were WC before that but only 1. East
could likely not have had one each year that the 1 WC system was
in place.
Dallas in the mid 1970's got to the SB as a WC before losing to
the Steelers. They beat Minnesota on a Hail Mary pass - Pearson should
have been called for interference - and then won the NFC Championship
game the following week against ????
The Crazy Met
|
9.3176 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Canes and Hoyas,Canes and Hoyas | Thu Jan 05 1995 08:30 | 7 |
|
Woops your right welcher I just was looking at the WC game itself!
Chap
|
9.3177 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Jan 05 1995 09:37 | 10 |
| > WCs started in 78.
>
> In 87 they had no WC as Minny and NO were the 2!
> 88 Minny and the Rams.
>
> I believe thats it!!
As mentioned, in the pre-wild card game days, Detroit (1970) and
Chicago (1977) made the playoffs as the only wild card team. Note that
in no year did the NFC West send the sole wild card team.
|
9.3178 | Carroll fired by Jets? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Jan 05 1995 10:51 | 6 |
| Heard on the radio coming to work that they done put Pete Carroll outta
his and the Jets fans' misery. Fired is what I heard.
Any confirmations? Baptisms?
TTom
|
9.3179 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Thu Jan 05 1995 12:42 | 3 |
| 1PM news conference. Supposed to name Kotite as the new head coach.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3180 | Kotite for Carroll? Who won? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Jan 05 1995 12:47 | 5 |
| Dumping Carroll and signing Kotite?
This is indeed something for the die hard fans to celebrate.
TTom
|
9.3181 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:18 | 4 |
| I feel bad for all of the Jets fans.
Dennis Faust
|
9.3182 | THE END IS NEAR! | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:25 | 13 |
| Just when you thought it mighta bottomed out...
The National Enquirer, yessir that specious rag, is negotiating with the
Tampa Bay Buccaneers about buying the team. The magazine owners and
executives are said to be meeting the the Bucs trustees.
In other signs that may portend the Apocolypse now:
o A girl is in the finals of the Punt, Pass & Kick contest
o Wayne Fontes was given a 2 year extension.
TTom
|
9.3183 | A marriage made in hell | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:46 | 5 |
| The National Enquirer and the NFL. Maybe it'll be renamed the NEFL.
And you thought the NFL couldn't get sleazier if it tried.
Steve
|
9.3184 | what a dunce | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:21 | 7 |
| > o Wayne Fontes was given a 2 year extension.
I think I speak for all Packer fans when I say:
Y-I-P-P-E-E !!
|
9.3185 | more and others | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:23 | 10 |
| What I don't understand was all this talk about not being satisfied with
just making the playoffs but actually wanting to win one of 'em.
So what happens? The Lions lose and give Fontes a contract extension.
Also, in case it hasn't been pointed out somewhere, Jerry Jones has given
Barry Switzer a_extension. This before Switzer coaches his firsted NFL
playoff game, much less win one.
TTom
|
9.3186 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:24 | 4 |
|
good YESMEN are hard to find TTom.........
;^)
|
9.3187 | or is it pawn to king-4? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:25 | 5 |
| re: YESMEN.
Didn't they do the original version of Louiee Louiee?
TTom
|
9.3188 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:26 | 9 |
| >Dumping Carroll and signing Kotite?
Kotite is a former Jets assistant coach. He's well liked in NY, and is
a native NY'er/Brooklynite.
I'll put it in here now: The Jets will be 8-8, MINIMUM. That's an
immediate +2 before he makes any personnel changes. And even with
an aging Esiason, he'll be much happier to not have to deal with
that jerk in Philly.
|
9.3189 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:42 | 8 |
| <<< Note 9.3188 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>I'll put it in here now: The Jets will be 8-8, MINIMUM. That's an
I'll counter that by saying the Jets will be fighting the Bills for the
AFC East cellar next season.
Mark.
|
9.3190 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:01 | 3 |
| where'd JoJ-not when you really want to hear from him?
brews
|
9.3191 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | CorpAid-GiveToThoseWhoTake! | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:06 | 4 |
| Hey Brews, JoJ is now JoS(teelers). No flies on him. Two games
I like a lot this weekend are Green Bay and Miami with the points.
/Don
|
9.3192 | Mediocre coaches are easy to find... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:10 | 2 |
| I thought Kotite and Carroll were the same pserson. Has
anyone seen them together?
|
9.3193 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:24 | 4 |
|
I forgot that Jo* was the original Wardlevane, even before TC*.
brews
|
9.3194 | Coaches/Sander-Smith | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | God cares. | Thu Jan 05 1995 15:38 | 19 |
| I'm shocked by the Fontes signing. I thought he'd be gone.
I don't know what to make of Kotite. Seemed like he over-
achieved like crazy for awhile there.
I've heard some "Smith is better than Sanders" remarks lately
following his -1 yard. How pathetic! I talked to Mike Childs
about it. He mentioned seeing comparative films of the two backs
and the times Smith wouldn't even see contact until ~8 yards
downfield. What Sanders would do under such circumstances is too
scary to even think about!
I saw the Packer game. He was typically met by 3 to 5 Packers
behind the line of scrimmage coming from all directions save behind
him. He never had a chance except one time, following a reception,
Wayne Simmons held on to him for dear life and managed to get him
out of bounds. I almost had a heart attack as only one Packer had
hands on him.
Tony
|
9.3195 | another winner | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Jan 05 1995 16:24 | 14 |
| one more for the you aint make it up any screwier.
Jeff Fisher, interim coach of the Hapless Oilers, who directed said same
Oilers to a grand total of 1 win, has been given a 3 year contract
rumored to be worth around a mil. Exact terms were not released,
presumably to protect the not guilty due to insanity. Bud Adams has found
his man, for now at least.
I was thinking about Kotite and the Panthers' penalties. I think the
league should fine anyone talking to Kotite about coaching and severely
fine anyone who actually hires him. Tell that Hess fella to fork over
some big bucks.
TTom
|
9.3196 | Feeling daring. | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Thu Jan 05 1995 18:58 | 4 |
|
I predict an all-NFC Central NFC Championship game.
- Sean
|
9.3197 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Thu Jan 05 1995 19:48 | 8 |
| I would be amazed if Kotite sniffed at a .500 record with the Jets. He
will also not be so popular in NYC after he pulls some of the bonehead
stuff he did in Philadelphia, with personnel, playcalling and clock
management. Mr. Hess will be dead before Kotite does anything with that
team.
Dennis Faust
|
9.3198 | good luck | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:34 | 11 |
| > -< Feeling daring. >-
>
> I predict an all-NFC Central NFC Championship game.
>
> - Sean
Hop a flight to Vegas. Play the odds on this one for 20 bucks and
if'n it hits, you could pay for the trip. San Fran is 11:1 and rising.
Dallas is 5: or 6:1. Go to Harrah's and they'll have odds on this parlay.
TTom
|
9.3199 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:42 | 5 |
| Great headline in the NY Post today, regading the Kotite hiring.
DUMB AND DUMBER
Jets fire one loser, hire another
|
9.3200 | Boomer part of problem not solution | AKOCOA::BREEN | It was in the bleak December | Fri Jan 06 1995 11:40 | 6 |
| re. Esiason,
Kotite has to move him to backup at best. He fades badly during
the season and I'd guess has too many non football things on his mind
(in his case healthy concern for his son).
billte
|
9.3201 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 09:23 | 8 |
| By Saturday night, 5 of the 6 teams remaining were division winners.
Had the 49'ers not pulled their 1st team in the last regular game on Monday
night then Green Bay would have won the N.F.C. Central and all 6 teams would
have been division winners.
Not a banner year for the wild cards,
George
|
9.3202 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:01 | 10 |
| Now that the Final Four have been decided, I find it interesting that
they were the two best teams from each division (first week bye).
Kinda shows how meaningless it can be to make the NFL playoffs as a
wildcard team.
I'm sure someone out there has the stats that show how often this
has happened.
billl
|
9.3203 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:04 | 11 |
| I thought the officiating (sic) during the Miami-SD game was
terrible.
If I were commissioner, I would do a couple of things to change
NFL football:
1. Instant replay (handled like timeouts)
2. Get rid of the face masks and hard sided helmets
Scott
|
9.3204 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:19 | 8 |
| It sounds like I'm in the minority here, but I think better trained
officials are the answer, not instant replay.
Wasn't Shula one of the ones on the Rules Committee who was very
much against IR? I wonder how he feels now.
billl
|
9.3205 | and full time | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:22 | 11 |
| How about full-time and trained.
One of the problems that officials have in both footballa and basketball
is that the players are so fast that a_outta position ref is doing
everything he can to just get to the play. They don't have time to
actually watch what the hail is going on.
The worsted calls were the SD-Miami game. The Jackson "forward pass" and
the Means TD that shouldn't have been are notable examples.
TTom
|
9.3206 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:28 | 17 |
| I'll tell ya how to make the officials better.
Make them subject ot a review after the game by the league. Then, when
found to be wrong, they'd suffer a severe penalty.
Like say, the guy who blew the call on the TD late in the game, he
loses his little finger. No questions asked, just the guilty verdict,
then the "executioner", say the league hires Jack Lambert fer the job,
comes out wif his TV knife and carves away the extremity. Then, when
the official no longer has enough fingers left to yank the ol yellow
flag out, they make em umpires fer baseball, wherein they start to lose
toes fer bad calls.
JMHO
JaKe
|
9.3207 | Poor calls | BUMP::MMARLAND | | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:36 | 27 |
| One of the factors not considered yet for the poor officiating is the new rules
It seems the NFl has a new penalty each year. A few years back it was "in the
grasp". I remember every little contact on the QB led to In the grasp. Then
I rememebr it was holding o nthe TE down fields. This year it was pass
interference. The rules are so complex yet at the same time leave no room for
judement calls. It's now very black and white, there little room for officials
to make a judement call.
As for the SD-Miami game, it was horrendous. Means was OB on one score, yet it
looked like he got the ball to the cone on the 4th down play.
The Jackson play boggles my mind, how to you get 2nd and 5, it's like giving
them 5 on 1st down, it should have been 1st and 15.
Perhaps the most boneheaded play I've seen in sometime.
Well if Pittsburg wins, then history will be made for one team will get the
ring for the Thumb.
mm
|
9.3208 | just grade 'em | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:38 | 7 |
| You don't have to resort to severe penalties.
They should have full-time, professional refs that are graded at the end
of the game. If'n a ref caint make or keep the grade sufficient for the
NFL, then send him down to that arena stuff.
TTom
|
9.3209 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 09 1995 10:39 | 27 |
| > Make them subject ot a review after the game by the league. Then, when
> found to be wrong, they'd suffer a severe penalty.
They are, every week of the season, plus they take a big rules test every
Thursday.
Problem is, you've got good ol' boy Jerry Seeman (head of officials) backing
up his guys despite their shortcomings. After the Detroit-Giants game
were a couple of blown calls sealed Detroit's victory, calls which were
at best, controversial, he comes out and says it was one of the best
officiated games all season. Of course he wouldn't address the utterly
blown Herman Moore knee DOWN call that set up Detroits winning score in OT.
So, a review is no good if the reviewer sucks.
Also, whoever made the point about the players getting faster and faster
is right. Over the last twenty-thirty years, players abilities and
speed have improved (this is consistent with all of athletics really)
but the officials have not. You're not telling me a 45 year old
man is gonna be quick enough to get in position to see what needs to be
seen when two 25 year old STUDS are sweating off testosterone faster
than the ref can pee.....
'Saw
|
9.3210 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Canes and Hoyas,Canes and Hoyas | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:35 | 10 |
|
Also on the 4th down play where he fumbled onto the pylon and
Miami was given the ball at the 1? That should have been a touchback
and Miami's ball at the 20? The rule states if the Offens fumbles the
ball and it goes out of the endzone it is a touchback!!!
Chap
|
9.3211 | Happens in every sport | AYOV27::FW_TEMP01 | John Hussey - Exiled in jocko land | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:39 | 10 |
| This happens in every sport. Basically the ref has to make a decision instantly
and may or may not be in the right position.
The commentator has 20,000 different camera angles and 60 hours in which to
replay it in one frame at a time. It generally evens itself out in the long
run (even Giants fans might admit this). Its a game - if the players were
perfect think how boring it would.
Give these guys credit for the 95+ out of 100 they get it right and the
commentator is wrong.
|
9.3212 | what network does the SB? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:46 | 12 |
| And speaking of commentators, even with the 20,000 (sic) camera angles,
it's amazing how bad they blow it, too.
Sometimes, it sounds like they're killing time 'cause they haven't a clue
as to what is happening. We're talking basics here, like down and
distance.
Who has the Super Bowl thised year, NBC? Does that mean we have to suffer
through Enberg and Trumpy? And how 'bout them studio shows they do with
Ditka and Gibbs. Can anyone make it more boring?
TTom
|
9.3213 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:48 | 21 |
| > Also on the 4th down play where he fumbled onto the pylon and
> Miami was given the ball at the 1? That should have been a touchback
> and Miami's ball at the 20? The rule states if the Offens fumbles the
> ball and it goes out of the endzone it is a touchback!!!
Pylon is out of bounds and I believe the ball is NOT considered to have
been IN the end zone. When a RB is running, dives, touches the pylon
with the ball and maintains possession, his team gets the ball at the
one.
If the pylon was considered to be "in the end zone", the ball breaking
the plane would give priority to the TD.
But the pylon is out of bounds....
I heard it discussed on the radio, and they said it was the correct call....
'Saw
|
9.3214 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:49 | 5 |
| I wish ABC and NBC would take a cue from FOX and ESPN and put the score up
in the corner......
'Saw
|
9.3215 | not perfect | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:51 | 4 |
| Fox had a bit of a glitch in the Cowboys game. Green Bay kicked a FG to
make it 7-3 but Fox kept it at 7-0.
TTom
|
9.3216 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Canes and Hoyas,Canes and Hoyas | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:52 | 10 |
|
I believe the SB is on ABC this year!
I think your wrong on that Saw if a player touches the pylon while
in possession of the ball it is a TD. I've seen it ruled that way many
times?.
Chap
|
9.3217 | outta bounds | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:55 | 6 |
| The pylon is outta bounds.
That doesn't mean that the refs might call it differently. But bad calls
don't change the fack that the pylon anything but outta bounds.
TTom
|
9.3218 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Jan 09 1995 11:57 | 8 |
|
I second the ABC superbowl coverage. of course with my record for facts
I wouldn't exactly take it to the bank.........
abc and nbc are probably afraid to admit that fox has come up with a great
inovation and that's why they don't post the score and clock like fox.
mike
|
9.3219 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Mon Jan 09 1995 12:01 | 11 |
| I think ABC has the SB. That'll mean the MNF jamokes. I can hardly
wait!
re score/time display:
I couldn't agree more. I find it irratating to tune into a game and
have to sit and wait for the announcers to get around to mentioning
the score and time left.
billl
|
9.3220 | Correct call | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | I have no answers | Mon Jan 09 1995 12:06 | 12 |
| Re: Means fourth down fumble ..
The reason it was NOT a touchback was because it was a FOURTH down
play. You are not allowed to fumble FORWARD on a fourth down play,
the ball is marked at the spot of the fumble. If it had been a
second or thrid down play, then it would have been a touchback, Miami
ball at the 20 yard line instead of the 1 yard line.
Ironically, it was the famous Raider fumble in Jack Murphy Stadium that
caused the introduction of this rule.
Vinny
|
9.3221 | just say NO to Deon! | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Mon Jan 09 1995 12:22 | 15 |
| I now hope that both the Steelers and the 9ers advance to the SB.
Also on my wish list is that Deon "the dancing fool" Saunders
intercepts O'Donnell and Dermonti Dawson makes the bone crushing
tackle. Then the only dancing will be the stars circling that
dweeb's head.
I rarely wish others ill health (my MIL is an exception), but I
am so sick of seeing Saunders' antics when he does what he is
being paid to do, make tackles and intercept passes. You'd think
that each occurence was the winning tackle/interception in the SB.
Better yet, maybe the Cowboys will say the Steelers the trouble.
billl
|
9.3222 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 12:36 | 17 |
| There was an interesting piece about Deon Sanders on one of the games. One of
the 49'er line backers was saying that he didn't like the idea that Sanders was
coming to the team because of his attitude, gold chains, etc but once he got
there he found out that Sanders was a decent guy. Now they get along great.
Sanders gets bad press but I see no evidence that he slacks off or doesn't
give 100% and I've never heard his team mates complain about him being on
their team in either baseball or football. And quarterbacks don't seem to go
anywhere near him if they can avoid it. He's a true NFL all-star who deserves
to be in the pro-bowl.
And as for this candy-ass nonsense about him acting up when he scores,
there's a way teams can stop that which works every time. Just tackle him
before he gets into the endzone. If they don't, then they deserve what they
get.
George
|
9.3223 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Jan 09 1995 12:40 | 7 |
|
The Keith Jackson illegal forward pass now makes sense to me. It
was 1st and 20 from the 15. Jackson was at the 35 when he "passed"
the ball. So a 5 yrd penalty from the spot (35), put the ball on
the 30. Which made it 2nd and 5 because of the lose of down.
Ron
|
9.3224 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Mon Jan 09 1995 12:55 | 12 |
|
Hey George what game are you watching? Sanders doesn't give 100% when
tackling or when the Niners are in zone. I don't care if his teammates
like him or not. I don't and sure seems like better than 1/2 of the
Western civilation doesn't either. He wants to celebrate and make an
ass out himself that's fine with me. I just feel the man is extremely
over-rated and the most undeseving choice of Defensive Player of the Year
in a long time.
If I had a vote it would have been Haley, Lloyd or White........
mike
|
9.3225 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jan 09 1995 13:04 | 8 |
|
The next bone-crunching hit that Deion makes will be his
first. He's the best cover man in the league - maybe ever.
But after watching him this season I can understand why he
used to throw forearms to the head when trying to tackle.
It's because he can't tackle. I'd like to see Dallas throw
the buttonhook to Irvin and let Deion try and take him down.
|
9.3226 | Don't need to sacrifice an INT to accomplish this, though | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 09 1995 13:08 | 10 |
|
> And as for this candy-ass nonsense about him acting up when he scores,
> there's a way teams can stop that which works every time. Just tackle him
> before he gets into the endzone.
I believe that was Billl's suggestion. Clean, hard and devastatingly
effective...
glenn
|
9.3227 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 13:38 | 6 |
| Deon's a defensive back, not a linebacker. He's rated on coverage, not on
bone breaking tackles.
The 49'ers have others guys that seem to handle that end of the game.
George
|
9.3228 | one fan | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 13:40 | 9 |
| Say what you want about Deon but he obviously has the respect of the
players.
Anyone notice how many time the Bears threw his way? How 'bout 0!
Deon profiles but with few exceptions, he's not taunting anyone. The
worst thing you could say about him is that he's having a good time.
TTom
|
9.3229 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 09 1995 13:46 | 12 |
| > Deon's a defensive back, not a linebacker. He's rated on coverage, not on
>bone breaking tackles.
>
> The 49'ers have others guys that seem to handle that end of the game.
Except for sweeps and running plays to the perimeter of the defense.
One of the coolest plays in football is seeing a cornerback play matador
against a sweeping guard.....
'Saw
|
9.3230 | Great cover guy granted but CB have to hit too | AD::HEATH | Dawgs Rule Pats Sip | Mon Jan 09 1995 14:56 | 11 |
|
re about Deion and defensive player of the year...
I was wathcing Sports Reporters yesterday and as much as
I hate Mike Lupica he had a great line...
How can Deion Sanders win Defensive player of the Year? He
didn't tackle anybody.
Jerry
|
9.3231 | Sanders the reason? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 15:03 | 17 |
| Someone has to get the credit for the defensive improvement for the best
team in football.
Sanders seems to be getting this nod from players, fans and those that
vote for such awards.
Mike Lupica is a_idiot. I'm a fairly faithful viewer of ESPN but when he
comes on, I go to another station.
Also,
> <<< Note 9.3230 by AD::HEATH "Dawgs Rule Pats Sip" >>>
^^^^^^^^^^
This may need some minor modification ;-).
TTom
|
9.3232 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jan 09 1995 15:18 | 5 |
| I agree that Lupica is preening little self-important idiot
but I've heard as many people credit rookie Bryant Taylor from
ND as Deion for the improvement in SF's defense. I'd say that
some combination of the two is what's done it. Somehow, I don't
think it'll be enough to stop Dallas from three-peating.
|
9.3233 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 15:45 | 9 |
| Well the Dion / Irving matchup may not be the thing that swings this contest.
The question is, can the Cowboys beat the 49'ers without Emmit Smith?
To their credit losing Smith didn't slow them up this weekend but then the
Packers seemed to mail in their performance. Playing the 49'ers in Candlestick
will be a whole different thing.
49'ers by a touchdown,
George
|
9.3234 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:01 | 7 |
|
>> The question is, can the Cowboys beat the 49'ers without
>> Emmit Smith?
The answer of course is "No!". But Dallas won't even try it
without Smith. The real question is can Dallas beat the Niners
with Smith being less than 100%?
|
9.3235 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:02 | 8 |
| > The answer of course is "No!". But Dallas won't even try it
> without Smith. The real question is can Dallas beat the Niners
> with Smith being less than 100%?
Another big question, will the supposedly muddy field (rain all week?)
affect Emmitt Smith ? How will it affect SF coverage of the Dallas
receivers, and vice-versa ? Will Troy get hurt planting his weak
wheels on bad turf ? Will Steve Young be a threat to run ?
|
9.3236 | Bryant Young? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:17 | 10 |
| Tommy,
Do you mean Bryant Young? Goodun, there. I agree that he has really helped.
It's almost amazing that a team as good as San Francisco has several
rookies that start and contribute. William Floyd is approaching Moose
Johnston type performance at fullback. Doug Brien had no problem helping
Mike Cofer move on to his nexted career.
TTom
|
9.3237 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:38 | 5 |
|
Chuck Knox canned as coach of the Rams.
Kevin
|
9.3238 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:42 | 10 |
| So what's the story on the Rams?
Seems I heard a week or so ago that an announcement for them moving to
St Louis was due any minute but I haven't heard anything since.
Since the Pats are playing the NFC West next year, who knows, they may be
going to St Louis after all, even if it's only for one game.
:*)}
George
|
9.3239 | supposedly a done deal | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 09 1995 16:45 | 6 |
| They're tlkaing like it's a done deal.
Even though they're headed to St. Louis, they'll still be in the NFC
West. A fack not missed by the Panthers and their fans.
TTom
|
9.3240 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 09 1995 17:02 | 9 |
| So this means that the 49'ers will be the only team in the NFC West that
are actually in the western part of the country, right?
You know rather than jumbling up divisions and schedules, maybe they should
just change the name of the NFC West to the NFC South. The teams are not
really west of much in the NFL sense but they are all south of the 40th
parallel.
George
|
9.3241 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Mon Jan 09 1995 17:03 | 7 |
|
Well if Chuck Knox was fired as head coach of the Rams today. Then
it is a done deal and the Rams are going to St. Louis. The owner
Georgia F. (?) said that Knox would coach the Rams if they stayed in
LA.
Ron
|
9.3242 | (8^)* | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Mon Jan 09 1995 19:30 | 5 |
| The Rams are too cheap to pay Knox's moving expenses to St. Louis,
that's why he was canned.
JaKe
|
9.3243 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Jan 10 1995 11:11 | 3 |
| Isn't SF just on the 40th parallel??
The Crazy Met
|
9.3244 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Jan 10 1995 11:19 | 12 |
| > <<< Note 9.3243 by METSNY::francus "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>
>Isn't SF just on the 40th parallel??
>
>The Crazy Met
Hey TCM, according to my map, SF is just south of the 38th parallel,
so it's definately south of the 40th.
Kevin
|
9.3245 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Jan 10 1995 11:32 | 3 |
| Thanks! What about NYC?
The Crazy Met
|
9.3246 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Tue Jan 10 1995 11:40 | 11 |
| > <<< Note 9.3245 by METSNY::francus "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>
>Thanks! What about NYC?
>
>The Crazy Met
Looks like it is just south of the 41st parallel. BTW, I've got maps
of the world, the US, and Colorado hanging on my wall. I don't know
this stuff off the toppa my haid.
Kevin
|
9.3247 | philly is right on 40th | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Tue Jan 10 1995 11:54 | 1 |
|
|
9.3248 | more underclassmen | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 10 1995 12:01 | 12 |
| The lists of underclassmen turning pro is growing. They have until
tomorrow to declare for the draft. So far:
Ty Law, DB, Michigan
Curtis Johnson, RB, No Carolina
Greg Black, DB, No Carolina
Bobby Taylor, DB, Notre Dame
Ki-Jana Carter, RB, Penn St
And of course, Salaam already previously declared.
TTom
|
9.3249 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Canes and Hoyas,Canes and Hoyas | Tue Jan 10 1995 12:03 | 4 |
|
No Warren Sapp yet??
|
9.3250 | him too and more | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 10 1995 12:08 | 1 |
|
|
9.3251 | It won't even be as close as the final score | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peat | Thu Jan 12 1995 20:51 | 14 |
| Well the big game is almost here so I'll put my prediction in for the
SF-Dallas game..........
Dallas 27 SF 14..............
SF can thank the books in Vegas for the number Dallas is gonna do on
them............slapping them in the face by making them such big dogs
theres no way that line should be more than 3 for home field
advantage.....even Jimmy Johnson couldn't get them more motivated with
his words of wisdom and we know how good he was............
3 in a row and the first to win 5....................
Tom
|
9.3252 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS, best in the AFC | Fri Jan 13 1995 07:59 | 4 |
9.3253 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Jan 13 1995 09:00 | 3 |
| Pittsburg(h) will cover. SF will win, but won't cover.
Mark.
|
9.3255 | 2 good games, both games go over with the dogs' | BIGQ::WEST | | Fri Jan 13 1995 09:15 | 12 |
|
the DOGS look real good on Sunday.....thats underdogs not the Dawgs
from Cleveland....hoping for 2 good games....
SF 27 Dallas 27 its into the second OT period.....close game!!
Emmitt is really healthy, Switzer pulled a fake injury vs GB..
Pittsburg 20 San Diego 17 Pitts "D" holds off the final drive.
Bam Morris has 2 TDs as they run Morris and Foster in the same
backfield to stun SD game plan.....John L plays tight end after
Eric Green goes down again.....
|
9.3256 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Theresa's Sound World | Fri Jan 13 1995 09:15 | 6 |
|
Karen, quit talking about Hal's heroes like that!!!!!!!!
love that p-name. who had the pleasure of hanging that on him???
mike
|
9.3257 | Two close games | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass - #1 again!!! | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:00 | 5 |
| San Diego 16, Pittsburgh 13 - Carney wins it in OT.
San Fran 31, Dallas 27 - 'Boys don't go down without a fight.
NAZZ
|
9.3258 | dog-over; fav | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:09 | 13 |
| Nazz,
Is that your real pick or is it a reverse negative mojo type pick where
you think the Steelers will win and then you think that if'n you think
that it aint gonna happen?
In any case, I like the San Diego-Pitt game to be close and surpisingly
high scoring. Not like the pseudo lasted game they played but it'll be
a_over. San Francisco will cover easy if'n they win the game. A close
game probably favors Dallas. Who knows it may come down to Brien and
Boniol. But I don't think so.
TTom
|
9.3259 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:25 | 6 |
|
Pittsburgh 31, San Diego 10, - Humphries spends afternoon sitting in mud.
San Fran 27, Dallas 17 - Bump in road to 49'er superbowl rings.
George
|
9.3260 | could happen | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:28 | 6 |
| > Pittsburgh 31, San Diego 10, - Humphries spends afternoon sitting in mud.
George that's gonna be a bit hard, what with Three Rivers having a carpet
and all.
TTom
|
9.3261 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:29 | 4 |
| Through the carpet, through the concrete, through any rock, down to mud.
It won't be pretty,
George
|
9.3262 | been there? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:46 | 5 |
| I hear you.
In fack, dint a Brownie try to do this using Terry Bradshaw's haid, once?
TTom
|
9.3263 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | STEELERS, best in the AFC | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:51 | 2 |
9.3264 | carpets are fer sissies | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 13 1995 10:58 | 0 |
9.3265 | Does Quebec have the sports lottery too? | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Fri Jan 13 1995 11:16 | 9 |
| As I recall the Ontario Lottery requires a minimum of 3 teams parlayed
and in football they have to win by 3 (even the dog). I kind of like
the dogs here as a parlay but I'd still need a 3rd team.
Now in cases like this on the Ontario system you would find the best
favorite in the world to win by 3. The only other sport going is
baskets (also need win by 3 I think).
But I'm not going all the way to Canada to get this down anyway...
|
9.3266 | Underclassmen in the draft | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | I have no answers | Fri Jan 13 1995 12:25 | 37 |
| NFL Draft Early Entries
The players who have been granted special eligibility to enter the
1995 NFL draft on April 22-23 with position and school:
Derrick Alexander, de, Florida State
Toney Bates, de, Iowa
Greg Black, dt, North Carolina
Blake Brockermeyer, ot, Texas
Devin Bush, db, Florida State
Ki-Jana Carter, rb, Penn State
Shannon Clavelle, dt, Colorado
Lee DeRamus, wr, Wisconsin
Brian Easter, lb, Arizona State
Brian Fitzgerald, rb, North Carolina State
Elliott Fortune, dt, Georgia Tech
Che Foster, rb, Michigan
Profail Grier, rb, Utah State
Brandell Jackson, rb, Baylor
Jack Jackson, wr, Florida
Trezelle Jenkins, ot, Michigan
Curtis Johnson, rb, North Carolina
Greg Landry, g, Boston College
Ty Law, db, Michigan
Mike Mamula, de, Boston College
Curtis Martin, rb, Pittsburgh
Lovell Pinkney, wr, Texas
Craig Powell, lb, Ohio State
Brian Robinson, db, Auburn
Rashaan Salaam, rb, Colorado
Warren Sapp, dt, Miami
James Stewart, rb, Miami
Korey Stringer, ot, Ohio State
Lorenzo Styles, lb, Ohio State
Bobby Taylor, db, Notre Dame
Johnny Thomas, wr, Arizona State
Tamarick Vanover, wr, Florida State
John Walsh, qb, Brigham Young
|
9.3267 | some gooduns there | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 13 1995 12:31 | 10 |
|
Perhaps the big news is that Simeon Rice is *NOT* going pro. He's decided
to stay at Illinois. Rice had been projected in about everyone's top 5
and Mel Kiper had him as the overall #1 pick going to the Panthers.
Right now, I would think that there's several of these that either
J'ville or Charlotte would want. Sapp has been mentioned often. So has
Walsh. Either Ki-Jana or RushOn would be nice to see, too.
TTom
|
9.3268 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Fri Jan 13 1995 12:59 | 16 |
|
They should trade the picks for players and picks. ONE player
isn't going to make these teams. They can build a nucleaus this
year. Then chances are both teams will be battling for the #1 for
the next couple of years anyways. Once you have the nucleaus
draft the QB, DL, RB with the #1/#2 pick in a year or two.
For football I would build the team by getting players and
draft picks. For the sole reason that football is a team of 22
players. This is why I say ONE player won't make a difference. If
it was basketball or some other sport. With only 5 or 6 players playing
at any given time. Then YES take the best player and don't trade
the pick.
Ron
Ron
|
9.3269 | Different playing field | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | I have no answers | Fri Jan 13 1995 13:14 | 23 |
| I agree with Ron that ONE player will not make the difference
for the expansion teams, it takes 20+ players to make a good team.
But I think that with the new rules in place (all the extra draft
picks the expansion teams get), the salary cap (over payed players
being exposed/waived/traded) and free agency that an expansion team
can contend for the playoffs in as little as three years.
Why do I beleive this? Look at Dallas under Jimmy Johnson. They
went from laughing stock (1-15) to the top of the heap in the
same time frame. How did they do it? By stockpiling HIGH draft
choices and making smart player personell moves.
The expansion teams already have a stockpile of draft choices,
they will be able to pick up some decent players through the
expansion draft, and they may be able to grab a few quality
players through free agency.
I can't speak for Carolina, (since they don't have a coach in place yet)
but I would not be surprised to see Tom Coughlin have Jacksonville
in the playoffs before 1999.
Vinny
|
9.3270 | how bout this??? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Fri Jan 13 1995 13:22 | 5 |
| Think maybe either Carolina or Jacksonville would be interested
in Ricky Watters and SF's 1st round pick for their 1st round pick?
Frank 49er Mendez
|
9.3271 | They won't spend if they don't have to | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Fri Jan 13 1995 13:36 | 8 |
| Both expansion franchises will play it smart by postioning themselves
to grab the low picks in the drafts the first few years while keeping a
low payroll and profiting from their expansion status to draw the first
few years.
Then about year three when the novelty wears off they spend the money
and go for the playoffs. This will tie in with the expiration of
Coughlin's contract.
|
9.3272 | 2 and out | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 13 1995 13:55 | 11 |
| Don't look for either of the firsted coaches for J'ville and Charlotte to
be around when any success happens.
With the pressures that will be on them, plus the continuing
merry-go-round of the NFL hirings and firings of coaches, both teams will
be ever vigilant for a new and better coach.
Besides, firing these guys will make everyone think they're making
progress.
TTom
|
9.3273 | PATRIOTS IN 1995/96 | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Fri Jan 13 1995 14:34 | 12 |
|
Blitzburgh 17 San Fran 49ers 24
F F
Boltergeist 10 Dallas Cowboys 13
********** SUPERBOWL ***********
* San Fran 49ers 31 *
* F *
* Blitzburgh 13 *
*********************************
|
9.3274 | Panthers might trade #1 | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 13 1995 15:16 | 16 |
| > Think maybe either Carolina or Jacksonville would be interested
> in Ricky Watters and SF's 1st round pick for their 1st round pick?
Funny you should mention this, FFM.
Today on the local sprots talk show they claimed that the Panthers are
not going to use their overall #1 but instead are shopping it around for
a player and a_other #1.
Haven't heard this exact scenario but a bunch of deals for RBs are being
mentioned.
The feeling is that this draft doesn't have a franchise player.
Specifically, no one is being projected like Bledsoe or Faulk.
TTom
|
9.3275 | Oh well | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Fri Jan 13 1995 15:25 | 6 |
|
Butts and our #1 to get Sapp. Nah sounds to good?
Jerry
|
9.3276 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jan 13 1995 16:18 | 4 |
| > Butts and our #1 to get Sapp. Nah sounds to good?
Butts will hit the waiver wire if he isn't scooped during the expansion
draft.
|
9.3277 | Predictions | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Fri Jan 13 1995 16:25 | 8 |
| I think Dallas and Pittsburgh are gonna win, but I want
Dallas to lose! Dallas' o-line wins it. Aikmen at least
as sharp as Young.
Steelers 20 Chargers 6
Cowboys 24 49'ers 20
|
9.3278 | Just hope both games are exciting! | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Fri Jan 13 1995 18:00 | 7 |
| I really can't stand Deon, so..
Dallas 27 Frisco 24
Pitts 24 Chargers 17
UMDan
|
9.3279 | | PTOS02::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Fri Jan 13 1995 18:10 | 10 |
| re.3278
The best part of Dall-Ass beating San ButtCrisco'd would be the fact
that we wouldn't have to put up with two weeks of Deion Sanders
interviews/segments.
JMHO
JaKe
|
9.3280 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | | Fri Jan 13 1995 20:53 | 15 |
|
Fairywhiners-cowgirls Tough choice, girls or fairies?
Steelers-Bolts Steelers
This read only GIANTS fan must root for a manly man kind of
Steeler team. I always root NFC except this year when the
two teams I hate most are battling for the Big Dance.
Shark
|
9.3281 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Sun Jan 15 1995 21:28 | 13 |
| Well as I wrote last week ideal SB matchup as far as I was concerned
would be SF vs. SD. A nice quiet two weeks in ::sprots leading to the
SB - well after the Cowpoke fans bit*h and moan about a call here and a
call there. btw what angle showed the Cowboy getting both feet in the
endzone on their 4th TD? And Jakester & co. will just be in mourning
for a while. A peace and quiet for a change.
SF is put as a 17.5 favorite. That is the highest starting spread in SB
I believe that Colts ended as 18 point favorites over the Jets and
Vikings might have been at 17.5 against KC on game day.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3282 | (8^)* | CSOA1::JACOB | | Mon Jan 16 1995 00:31 | 10 |
|
>> And Jakester & co. will just be in mourning
>>for a while. A peace and quiet for a change.
Kiss my a$$, shorty.
JaKe
|
9.3283 | No 3 peat this year | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys shooting for 3-peat | Mon Jan 16 1995 07:41 | 5 |
| No excuses from this Cowboy fan......congrats to the niners and
hopefully they will continue the NFC domination of the SB.
Tom
|
9.3284 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Mon Jan 16 1995 08:28 | 5 |
| You gotta figure that the Chargers will continue to 'doormat'
trend of the AFC in the SB.
billl
|
9.3285 | The kings are DEAD!!!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Garrett > Aikman | Mon Jan 16 1995 08:32 | 28 |
|
Well there is one w/o an excuse than!!!
Last night on talk Radio it was rediculous!! Heres a few
comments from both Cowgirl players and fans!!
"If we had a 21 pt lead in the first 5 minutes we woulda beat them
by a hundred" (player)
" Well the NFC is not being represented by the best team this year"
(player)
Deion gets away with more shoving than anyone in the NFL (player)
he musta missed irvins pushoff on his 2nd TD??
Referees didn't want Dallas in the Bowl (idiot fan)
We still outplayed them even though half our team was decimated
by injuries. (idiot fan)
As far as I'm concerned we are going to the SB (idiot fan) you
better by tickets than)
I hadn't seen as much crying since 8 last night when my wife was
watching the All My Children reunion show!!! :-)
Chap
|
9.3286 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 16 1995 09:25 | 19 |
| Well, regardless of what Jerry Jones says, or any of the players, it's my
opinion that if Jimmy Johnson was still the coach, the Cowboys would have
made a game of it.
Switzer made some odious mistakes -- his clock management at the end of the
first half was horrid.
Supposedly Larry Allen's backup couldn't play -- he was healthy, but
doesn't have the skills. Then why is he the backup? What's with that?
I can't imagine a 300 pounder moving on a gimpy ankle, let alone playing
football.
I'm glad San Fran won (some former Giants on the team), but I will give
the Dallas players this: They Never Quit!
'Saw
|
9.3287 | bad line = loss | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 09:34 | 18 |
| I'm not sure what effect Jimmy Johnson woulda had.
What kilt the Cowboys was the overall physical status of the offense,
especially the line and Emmitt.
The point where the Boys started their slide was the car wreck that ended
Williams' season. Throw in a couple of bad wheels for Nate Newton and
Allen and you've got Troy Aikman getting knocked down and/or sacked about
a dozen times.
Emmitt was obviously gimp. Shore he scored a couple of times but that
finished drives others had set up.
The biggest blunder by Switzer was bumping the ref on the no call by Neon
against Michael Irvin. Barry did his best Lou Holtz but the refs were
non-plusssed and added a 15 yard penalty.
TTom
|
9.3288 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 16 1995 09:44 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3287 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>
>What kilt the Cowboys was the overall physical status of the offense,
>especially the line and Emmitt.
I don't think it's that complex. What killed the Cowboys was 3 turnovers that
lead to 21 quick points. From that point on they actually outplayed the 49'ers
28-17.
It's one game, anything can happen. Doesn't prove much except who gets
to play the next game and who goes home.
George
|
9.3289 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 16 1995 10:03 | 26 |
| Still, you have to question some of Switzer's coaching decisions.
I mean, we can play what if forever. What if Pickett's Charge had
been successful, what if Robert E. Lee had pulled out to the southeast
and gotten between the Federals and Washington.....
So, what if:
- they don't call the draw on 3rd down in the red zone,
and end up going for the field goal that gets shanked?
(I'd have tried a pass to Novacheck....)
- they execute some proper clock management late in the first
half.
If either of those goes the other way, the game is a LOT closer.
Neon Deion, as much as I don't like his on-field personna, DID take
Harper, the Niner Killer, out of the game....
'Saw
|
9.3290 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Mon Jan 16 1995 10:10 | 19 |
|
RE: a few back
Yes, Prime Time got away with one against Irvin (left arm into his chest
on the deep pass. But I had a hard time feeling sorry for Michael.
Why?
No one, repeat, *no one*, pushes off as much as Michael Irvin. Yes,
the guy is a great receiver, but this is something that constantly
jumps out at me when you see replays.
I'm kind of inclined to put that one in the "what goes around, comes
around" category. Refs have been ignoring contact when Irvin's
involved all year, why stop now?
At least Irvin had the intelligence to not do anything stupid to draw
a penalty after the play. He was able to leave that to the coach.
Roland
|
9.3291 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Jan 16 1995 10:34 | 12 |
|
One of the constants about championship teams is that they have few injuries
during the season and certainly in the playoffs. Dallas had a remarkably
healthy team the last 2 years come playoff time and it showed. This year
they were not so lucky. Even so it was the first 4 minutes of the game
that killed 'em and it had nothing to do with injuries.
SF got its payback for signing Sanders yesterday. He was signed for this one
game to stop Harper and he did that. Dallas just refused to throw the ball
to Harper, who Deion covered.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3292 | Not enough octane | BUMP::MMARLAND | | Mon Jan 16 1995 10:42 | 14 |
| Plain and simple the best team won. The 3 quick turnovers were the game. Had
nothing to do with coaching. Solid defensive plays on all 3 plays and SF took
advantage. Like the last to NFC championship games the D determined the outcome.
Remember the last 2 years SF 's D could come up with the big stop when needed.
Well the same happened to Dallas yesterday.
The only person on Dallas who forgot to show up was Switzer. Stupid play calling
and time mgmt.
Despite injuries, the Boys, show spirit and desire. Not enough this year. End of
discussion.
Mike
|
9.3293 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 16 1995 10:46 | 7 |
| While I don't think that Deion is "Defensive Player of the Year" he certainly
does excel at coverage. It's hard to defense against raw speed, and when that
raw speed is on defense, your passing accuracy has to be dead bang on, and
you might need some deception. Deion adds an extra element....
'Saw
|
9.3294 | game ball or 2 to Eric Davis | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 10:55 | 9 |
| Ol' Neon was upstaged yesterday by Eric Davis. Davis had 2 interceptions,
including one on the firsted series that he ran back for a TD. This sorta
said how the day was gonna go for the Boys. On the second series, he
stripped Irvin of the ball - musta know Neon don't tackle ;-).
'Bout the onliest thing Davis didn't do was the Neon High Step as he went
into the end zone.
TTom
|
9.3295 | Looked MVP to me | AYOV27::FW_TEMP01 | John Hussey - Exiled in jocko land | Mon Jan 16 1995 10:56 | 5 |
| Deion had a hand in the 1st 2 turnovers just being on the field. Dallas were
obsessed with avoiding him.
The difference in the pass interference calls looked like Jerry Rice had the
brains (slipped?) to fall over whereas Irvin stayed on his feet.
|
9.3296 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 16 1995 11:33 | 29 |
| Well the only reason Eric Davis looked better than Sanders was that they
wouldn't go near Sanders all day. He effectively took who ever he was playing
out of the game. That doesn't look all that great on highlight films but it
probably does as much to win ball games as coming up with an interception. When
they did throw at Neon he left Irving babbling by the sidelines and walked away
with an easy interception.
Sanders is one outstanding player who has as much impact on defense as any
defensive back I've ever seen. He not only controls his guy, he influences the
entire game plan of the offense.
As for the Dallas coach and "what ifs", if they had made that field goal
that would have been a tying drive at the end of the game. If they had thrown
into the endzone maybe it would have been a touchdown but they still would have
had to score a touchdown on the final drive to win.
I just don't see where it was that big a deal, most likely they would have
lost no matter what he had called on that play. But if he had been a really
bad coach and had failed to pull his team together at the beginning of the
season they would have finished 7-9 and would have been home for Christmas.
At least he got his guys to the NFC Championship game and gave them a shot.
They threw that chance away with those 3 early turnovers and he did a fair
job of trying to get it back outscoring the 49'ers 28-17 from that point on.
Everyone contributed to the loss but it seems that if you consider the
entire year and the entire game, the Dallas coaching staff came off ok.
George
|
9.3297 | good | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 11:38 | 9 |
| Yeah, Neon literally took Alvin Harper outta the game.
After Neon completely stopped Harper, he started to free lance and ended
up on Irvin a couple of notable times. Aikman, however, continued to
ignore Harper.
Ol' Alvin's probably still crying about the Boys not going to him.
TTom
|
9.3298 | Thought Cowboys the Better Team | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | God cares. | Mon Jan 16 1995 12:13 | 34 |
| Being a Packer fan, the most important part for me was for
the Cowboys to lose. Why? NO THREEPEAT. The Pack won the
NFL Championship in 65, 66, and 67, but the 65 one was before
the 1st Super Bowl. Thus, had the Cowboys won it this year,
they would have done something more remarkable than what the
Pack did.
But, I feel the Cowboys are the better team even though I
wanted them to lose.
They have a rookie right tackle with a bum ankle playing instead
of arguably the best offensive lineman in the game. Smith plays
on bad wheels and re-pulls a hamstring and misses the last quarter
or so. They spot the 49'ers 21-0 in their park and still are in
the game till the end.
The two biggest plays were the late 1st hald TD and the whole noncall
Switzer penalty sequence. The 10 yard draw didn't help either.
Johnson must be in 7th heaven! Switzer just really blew it, lacking
the control so pivotal at that late stretch of the game.
Man, if it was 3rd and 10 instead of 3rd and 25 OR if the penalty
was called, who knows what would have happened?
But, those Cowboys were real warriors. What can you say about
Aikmen, Irvin, and Smith?
And even though Sanders did interfere...what a game! How many DB's
can block a sideline pass thrown by Aikmen like he did? Or how
about outrunning Irvin and making that INT? Amazing.
Two awesome teams, but I think the Cowboys are the better team.
Tony
|
9.3299 | Whatta game! | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Niners smoke, Cowboys choke | Mon Jan 16 1995 12:17 | 16 |
|
I never liked Jimmy, but Barry has given me a greater appreciation for
what he did. First, he knew how to coack a team, and never cost them a
big game by a series of stupid coaching mistakes and second, he would
never whine about the field or the refs when he and his team were more
responsible for the loss.
The other thing that bugs me is the cowgirl fans saying that the 'girls
would have won had they not gotten behind early, because the 'girls had
better stats. The early turnovers and a 21-0 lead halfway through the
1st quarter completely changed the complexion of the game. The niners
and girls gameplans were different than what would have been.
Boy was it fun to watch, though.
brews
|
9.3300 | Expectations probably too high but this game was slop, in slop | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 16 1995 12:29 | 14 |
|
Anybody else think that for the Game of the Decade featuring the two
best teams in the NFL, that SF-Dallas was very sloppily played,
even beyond what the field conditions could excuse? I'm not talking
just about the turnovers, but rather stuff like Dallas' easy TD to
Irvin when on the ropes down 21-0, SF's inexcusably easy TD to Rice
at the end of the half, etc. These weren't coaching mistakes, but
rather major breakdowns, even considering the great players involved.
The best team probably won but the game was not played with at the
mental or intensity level I expected coming off the flawless,
destructive exhibitions by each team the week before...
glenn
|
9.3301 | Steelers lack of D | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 12:34 | 5 |
| The Major Breakdown Award o' the Day should go to the Steelers D on the
TD pass to Pupunu. Pupunu was beyond wide open as virtually no one was
around to defend or stop him.
TTom
|
9.3302 | Yup, it was Breakdown Sunday... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 16 1995 12:42 | 18 |
|
> The Major Breakdown Award o' the Day should go to the Steelers D on the
> TD pass to Pupunu. Pupunu was beyond wide open as virtually no one was
> around to defend or stop him.
I honestly think the winning TD was worse, from a strategic viewpoint.
You kind of expect one of these things per game from a blitzing
defense, if not to that extent. Pretty sure the Pupunu play came on
either 1st or 2nd down where the defenders were fooled and bit on the
run. Okay, you got burned once. But absolutely no way should a
_primary_ receiver get that wide open on 3rd-and-15 protecting a
3-point lead in the final minutes. That play falls into the miracle
category (close to the Rice TD at the end of the first half, where most
of the defense should have been playing on the goal line, conceding the
FG if necessary).
glenn
|
9.3303 | no respect | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 13:08 | 20 |
| Even Switzer was commenting on the D or rather lack of D on the Rice TD
right at the half.
The long bomb that McKyer failed to cover was a case of bad execution
more than bad defense. McKyer got completely turned around and by the
time the ball got there he had no chance.
BTW, McKyer had to be carried off the field at the end of the game. He
completely lost it after the game.
The comments in the paper that are most telling are by the Chargers that
to a man credit Pittsburgh attitude more than anything else. The Steelers
were reported already at work on Super Bowl videos. SD noticed the
complete lack of respect and used it as motivitation. The lack of respect
evidently continues with Woodson refusing to admit that the best team is
moving on and with Figures doint that you didnt win it we lost it thing.
Give it up. You lost.
TTom
|
9.3304 | Forrrre! | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Mon Jan 16 1995 13:18 | 19 |
| >The comments in the paper that are most telling are by the Chargers that
>to a man credit Pittsburgh attitude more than anything else. The Steelers
>were reported already at work on Super Bowl videos. SD noticed the
>complete lack of respect and used it as motivitation. The lack of respect
>evidently continues with Woodson refusing to admit that the best team is
>moving on and with Figures doint that you didnt win it we lost it thing.
This isn't the first time it happened and probably won't be the last.
Teams seem to get caught looking past supposedly inferior opponents
only to find themselves booking early tee times and wondering what
hit them.
>Give it up. You lost.
That's true, but sure doesn't make it any easier for this Steeler
fan to swallow.
billl
|
9.3305 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 16 1995 13:35 | 15 |
| |>Give it up. You lost.
|
| That's true, but sure doesn't make it any easier for this Steeler
| fan to swallow.
Well, it's a bitch now, but as I've said, many, many times a loss like
this is a catalyst to greater success in the next season.
Cowher is a damn good coach, he's young, his talent base is stable... I think
that he'll bring them back.
'Saw
|
9.3306 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | President of Donny Osmond FanClub | Mon Jan 16 1995 13:47 | 7 |
|
to his credit Cowher took it like a man. basically gave the Chargers'
credit and said you don't loose on one play here or there you loose
because of the whole game and the whole team not one player.......
mike
|
9.3307 | not always | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 13:50 | 8 |
| >Well, it's a bitch now, but as I've said, many, many times a loss like
>this is a catalyst to greater success in the next season.
You mean like Buffalo did after the wide-right by Norwood? ;-)
Yeah, Cowher did show some class.
TTom
|
9.3308 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:06 | 7 |
| >>Yeah, Cowher did show some class.
What else would you expect from a native 'burgher?!
billl
|
9.3309 | Steelers will have to live with it; ain't no morality play though | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:16 | 16 |
|
I don't see that the Steelers need to make any apologies. For the most
part they are a tough, dedicated and generally classy bunch. It didn't
look to me like they were caught off guard, out-motivated or any
other such thing. They didn't make the plays when it was critical, so
they were beaten fair and square by a deserving Chargers team. They'll
have to deal with that fact and will likely be kicking themselves over
a long, bitter off-season. But the rest of the stuff, about the
talking and the supposed lack of respect, that sounds like post-facto
media garbage as usual; to the victors go the spoils, from the
vanquished a pound of flesh. Just one week ago it was the Steelers
that weren't receiving the proper respect before the Browns game, and
after the Super Bowl it'll be some other story, I'm sure.
glenn
|
9.3310 | Go Packman | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:17 | 15 |
| > What else would you expect from a native 'burgher?!
Or a guy who went to NC State!
From USA Today, today:
NFL best postseason records:
1. Green Bay 14-7 .667
2. San Francisco 20-11 .645
3. Dallas 28-18 .609
4. Washington 21-14 .600
5. PIttsburgh 17-12 .586
TTom
|
9.3311 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:28 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3309 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>
> I don't see that the Steelers need to make any apologies.
I agree with you here. In any sport winning a playoff doesn't mean you are
better, it just means you win and get to advance. Weak teams beat better teams
all the time.
This goes double for football where you only get one shot. Anyone can win one
game. How often in other sports does some team get blown out in the 1st game
of a 7 game series then go on to win?
At least Pittsburgh and Dallas made their opponents work for their victory
unlike the teams last week that just rolled over and let the teams walk over
them with 15+ margins of victory.
Still congradulations to the Padres and 49'ers. One TV station has already
started calling this the San Bowl.
I hope the Padres come ready to play and surprise everyone like they did
yesterday. It would be great to see a close game.
George
|
9.3312 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | President of Donny Osmond FanClub | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:33 | 9 |
|
I agree with you here. In any sport winning a playoff doesn't mean you are
better, it just means you win and get to advance. Weak teams beat better teams
all the time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
is this excuse #1 or #2 in the UNC handbook?
;^)
|
9.3313 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | President of Donny Osmond FanClub | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:34 | 5 |
|
Tommy, you'll be happy to know my notes friends over in ::Giants are enjoying
my p-name as well. Just don't expect to see me in ::RAD_RAD this week.....
;^)
|
9.3314 | could use a couple of 'em | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:42 | 15 |
| > Still congradulations to the Padres and 49'ers. One TV station has already
>started calling this the San Bowl.
>
> I hope the Padres come ready to play and surprise everyone like they did
>yesterday. It would be great to see a close game.
Padres are going to the Super Bowl? One lasted chance for Tony Gwynn?
NFL playoffs are like College hoops playoffs in the sense of one and
you're out. That's really the basis of the Tar Heel Excuse Bible.
Let's see, Dallas can invoke Excuse #1, injuries. The Steelers can use
#2, played a hot team.
TTom
|
9.3315 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Free Whitey Bulger! | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:42 | 5 |
| Hey Glenn, considering that the Steelers were taping their Super
Bowl Rap song last week the "lack of respect" theme has some validity.
At least the Bears backed up their "Super Bowl Shuffle" video...
/Don
|
9.3316 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Free Whitey Bulger! | Mon Jan 16 1995 14:43 | 1 |
| If it really is the Padres versus the 49ers give the 18 points!
|
9.3317 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:02 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3314 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>
>Padres are going to the Super Bowl? One lasted chance for Tony Gwynn?
Oops, got my SD teams mixed up.
That's what I get for buying the 1995 Bill James player rating book before
the game yesterday.
George
|
9.3318 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:03 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3312 by CNTROL::CHILDS "President of Donny Osmond FanClub" >>>
> I agree with you here. In any sport winning a playoff doesn't mean you are
>better, it just means you win and get to advance. Weak teams beat better teams
>all the time.
>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> is this excuse #1 or #2 in the UNC handbook?
Well it's clearly not an excuse since I'm not a Steelers fan and have no
reason to make excuses for their team.
It's just my belief that regardless of who wins, my team or anyone else's,
games don't show who is better, just who did better.
George
|
9.3319 | real power ratings? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:05 | 3 |
| Is Bill James the same James that rates war powers and weapons?
TTom
|
9.3320 | oops | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:07 | 5 |
|
No thats Janes
Jerry
|
9.3321 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | CanyourollmeanotherBullDurhamplease | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:11 | 2 |
|
Actually it's Jane's, a British arm's research group.
|
9.3322 | I figured you might for the Steelers though to see Tommy with that p-name | CNTROL::CHILDS | President of Donny Osmond FanClub | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:12 | 6 |
|
Touchy Touchy....I didn't say you were a fan, I didn't say you were making
an excuse. What I was asking was which one of the UNC excuse that ACCHris
used to exhaust us with was this one that's all.......
mike
|
9.3323 | but why baseball? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:15 | 6 |
| Janes Gang, that band that Joe Walsh used to play in afore he went to the
Eagles? ;-)
Jane's. I see. Thanks.
TTom
|
9.3324 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:22 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3322 by CNTROL::CHILDS "President of Donny Osmond FanClub" >>>
> Touchy Touchy....I didn't say you were a fan, I didn't say you were making
> an excuse. What I was asking was which one of the UNC excuse that ACCHris
> used to exhaust us with was this one that's all.......
Well I'm not really sure what UNC means or who ACCHris is so I'm not sure
what you mean but I'm not making excuses for anyone. I just have a belief in
general, even if my team wins, that games don't show who is better, just who
did better.
George
|
9.3325 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:25 | 4 |
| News mentioned yesterday that he LA Rams were most likely on
there way to St Louis, MO.
Scot
|
9.3326 | angst | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:27 | 17 |
| > Well I'm not really sure what UNC means or who ACCHris is so I'm not sure
This statement really astounds me. It makes me realize how much Digital
and SPROTS have lost the lasted couple of years or so.
Saw, we got us the makings of some type of eulogy, elegy or some dang
essay. This new Digital shore aint the old Digital.
George, none of this is directed towards you. Not Mike's comments about
Escuse Bibles and not mine about how things used to be. Read 21.*, about
any of 'em by Knorr and you'll encounter some reference to the Excuse
Bible.
TTom
|
9.3327 | I was a principal | CNTROL::CHILDS | President of Donny Osmond FanClub | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:28 | 11 |
|
UNC = University of North Carolina Tarheels
ACChris = the most zealous UNC fan ever to note in ::Sports
excuses he had so many every time UNC lost we started to number and
document them.
given your point of view I doubt you'd have qualified for weasel status...
;^)
|
9.3328 | enjoy | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:34 | 3 |
| I salvaged the Weasels Org chart and posted it in 21.
TTom
|
9.3329 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Free Whitey Bulger! | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:36 | 5 |
| I would've loved to hear Cyst's description of the overachieving
win by the "bench deprived" Star Heels over the star-studded Maryland
team last week... Hate to admit it, but I actually miss him.
/Don
|
9.3330 | nostalgia | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Mon Jan 16 1995 15:55 | 8 |
| Slasher,
I just read some of the great works of 90 and 91 in the ACC topic.
Not only do I miss ACChris, but BobHunt and MrT shore left us a legacy,
too.
TTom
|
9.3331 | Devastating news for ::SPROTS received in the mail | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Mon Jan 16 1995 16:19 | 4 |
| |Saw, we got us the makings of some type of eulogy, elegy or some dang
|essay. This new Digital shore aint the old Digital.
I'll say. You know this is true when dan'l gets hitched.
|
9.3332 | Best I could do on short notice.... | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Tue Jan 17 1995 10:19 | 110 |
| >|Saw, we got us the makings of some type of eulogy, elegy or some dang
>|essay. This new Digital shore aint the old Digital.
>
>I'll say. You know this is true when dan'l gets hitched.
The Bible says "In the midst of life, we are in death." Verily I say to
you this is true (can I get an amen?).
For an all too fleeting period of time, one bright and shining moment as
it were, SPORTS transcended mere notesfile-dom, and became more than the
sum of all its parts. There was a synergy, yes, there was an
electricity that flowed and coursed through its veins.
The Golden Age of SPORTS is no longer. Gone are icons we grew to cherish,
gone are the familiar trappings of a comfortable old friend.
MrT.... who could ever forget the incredible, incredulous, incontrovertible
and sometimes incriminating diatribes by the one, the only, the man who
created a miniature funeral pyre for a mouse whilst standing in his bathrobe,
testicles freezing in the Minnesota winter air, Tom Shaugnessy.
Who could ever forget the description of the AIDS sore seeping through the
back of his suit jacket, or his story about Conan the Librarian? Who
indeed could forget his satirical parody of a paean to Dean Smith, with its
wonderful line "it's all thrust up and knobby"? Who could forget the
personal name string "Plato, Homer, Voltaire, BobKnight", or the annual
"Ayrton Senna must die". My only regret was that when Ayrton Senna finally
did die, MrT wasn't around to write about it. Who could forget his wonderful
monicker for /Don: RoachyPoachy Main.....
Who can dare forget Bob Hunt, defender of the faith? Bob, who coined the
term Hare Smithna. Bob, the consumate Eagles and Phillies fan. Bob, the
big man, with a big heart, and a familial unit called the HuntCluster,
complete with Microhunts. Bob Hunt, noter extraordinaire.
Lost in the dusty annals of SPORTS time are the wonderful, opinion-packed
plot synopses of LA Law, when it was good. I'd miss a night, and come in
on a Friday, to find Bob's recap, and all was good with the world.
Bob Hunt went up against ACChris, sometimes in concert with MrT, but
more often, alone, by himself, hammering and chiseling away at the UNC
Excuse Bible. Bob, who carried the mantle alone after MrT departed, was
a crafty veteran of the ACC debates.
Bob Hunt, who longed to be a sportswriter, and fulfilled that dream recently.
ACChris, aka ACCrisp, was a UNC/DeanSmith zealot. More than a few of us got
a perverse, testicle-tingling, get me a roll of Bounty, pleasure when UNC
would lose and we'd know that ACChris would come in and start the excuses.
"We ran into a hot team", or "the players had exams" were among the almost
inumerable excuses he'd come up with. He'd also engage in more than his
share of LouHoltz sandbagging, especially if UNC got ranked high in the
pre-season polls.
ACChris, possessed (sorta) by Da Debil, blind follower of Hare Smithna,
saw a conspiracy behind every locked hotel room door.....
They were the Triumverate, the Holy Trinity as it were, of the UNC/DeanSmif
hoops wars. They are sorely missed, and to paraphrase my main main, old
Will, we shall not see their like again.
There are others on the roll of the SPORTS missing, others who added spice
and flavor, the Tabasco sauce if you will of the Sports Tavern.
Hawk, who always wanted to party wif you.
Mike Johnston, Junk Noter Extraordinaire -- that our Junk Note bears
his memorial name is testament to the abilities of this fine man.
The Bibe. A moment of silence please, in all sincerity, for the
man who restored my faith in boxing. With all due respect to
Tommy Brydie, Sports has never seen a boxing expert like The Bibe.
jIm DinSmORe. The Dinz. Dinsdale. Who could ever forget his
typing, or his wonderful malapropism, Hallugeons.
Jim Wardle, aka Wardlevane. Like a weathervane spinning in the
wind, Jim's allegiances changed, and changed, and changed.
John Devlin, JD, the LATmaster....
Dan "Park Effects" Schneider. Who could EVER forget his
"Schneider stole the butt", or his diatribes which rivalled
MrT. Last seen in Harlem, in pursuit of his MBA....
Hoot and Monty, Denny, Chap, REK, Kev.... the list goes ever on.
In the military, when you sit down to a meal, there is often a custom of
raising a glass and toasting "To absent comrades."
Here, I offer a toast, to Sports Golden Age, and those who took up the cause
and are no more:
To absent comrades!
'Saw
|
9.3333 | Re-alignment needed!!! | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:01 | 4 |
| Pittsburgh should be able to repeat as Central Division Champs
next year with the addition of the Expansion team. They will have
an easy 6 wins with Houston, Cincy, and Carolina in their division.
|
9.3334 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:04 | 5 |
|
Forget about Pittsburgh, can the '49ers schedule get any easier?
Atlanta, Rams, Jacksonville, and New Orleans.
Ron
|
9.3335 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Niners smoke, Cowboys choke | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:05 | 4 |
| The AFC Central was the weakest division in the NFL
this season. Adding Carolina will make it worse.
brews
|
9.3336 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:10 | 8 |
|
All the existing teams in those divisions play the expansion teams
twice, too. The division champs like the Steelers will have no added
advantage in winning their division the next year. It'll be the
runners-up that receive the advantage, in the run for wildcard spots.
glenn
|
9.3337 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Niners smoke, Cowboys choke | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:24 | 4 |
| THeir advantage will be in fighting for HFA, not in fighting it out in
their division.
brews
|
9.3338 | Seems like the bye week is the big advantage | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:27 | 1 |
|
|
9.3339 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:31 | 7 |
| Well now wait a minute.
Do all you Dawgs think that the Steelers will walk away with the AFC
Central?
~\~
George
|
9.3340 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 17 1995 13:48 | 17 |
| > Pittsburgh should be able to repeat as Central Division Champs
> next year with the addition of the Expansion team. They will have
> an easy 6 wins with Houston, Cincy, and Carolina in their division.
Cleveland plays the same teams the same number of times...
Cleveland - Pittsburgh should be just as good a matchup next year.
While the Browns' braintrust (and I use that term with great
reservations) doesn't seem to see the problem of having Vinny as
their #1 quarterback, it's still possible that the Browns will
improve in that area by next year.
I'll half-agree with you - _if_ Vinny is still the QB for the Browns
for the majority of the '95 season, _then_ Pittsburgh _should_ win
the AFC Central.
Joe
|
9.3341 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Steelers join the Browns in the Wait-til-next-year Club!!! | Tue Jan 17 1995 14:34 | 14 |
|
Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and the Niners won't gain that much (if
any) advantage from having the expansion teams in theri divisions.
Under the old scheduling algorithm, all the team in the 4-team
divisions (AFC-C & NFC-W) played each of the 5th place teams
from the two other divisions in their conferences. So both
Pittsburg and Cleveland played the Colts and Seattle this
year. Next year they'll play two games against Carolina
instead. Either way they get two games against last place
teams that they should win.... No big deal....
JimH
|
9.3342 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | STEELERS-1994 AFC Central Champs | Tue Jan 17 1995 16:11 | 6 |
| Uh, excuuuuse me peoples, but Carolina is going into the NFC West and
Jacksonville is going into the AFC CEntral, not visa versa as somma
younzes has been putting in here.
JaKe
|
9.3343 | Freakin Lunatics? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 17 1995 16:57 | 6 |
| Nice effort, Saw.
One question: who started the Freakin Lunatics? I remember when you had
to try out to make the team and now it's down to a handful o' us.
TTom
|
9.3344 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | President of Donny Osmond FanClub | Tue Jan 17 1995 17:15 | 4 |
|
I think it was Hawk......
mike
|
9.3345 | Looking down from SPROTS heaven | MSBCS::GALVIN | knockemdownspinemrounheygobowling | Wed Jan 18 1995 08:45 | 13 |
| Saw,
I got's to add a name to your note in .3332
Al (King of the one-liners) Cote.
A former colleague of mine, and all around good Joe. May he rest in
peace. A life cut too short.
Thanks,
RTG
|
9.3346 | hopefully | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Jan 18 1995 10:30 | 6 |
| I forgot about Al.
Maybe him and Bibe are discussing the relative merits of Don King right
now. ;-)
TTom
|
9.3347 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Jan 18 1995 10:54 | 11 |
|
Looks like it's official, the Rams are going to St. Louis. Are they
going to change the name or will it still be the Rams? Looks like
the Rams really made out on this deal.
On a Ram related note, Sonny Libbick of the Colorado St. Rams has
decided that he will stay at CSU instead of taking the head coaching
job at Miami. that really surprised me.
Kevin
|
9.3348 | | DELNI::FORGET | | Wed Jan 18 1995 11:44 | 11 |
|
Last night of ESPN, they said the St.Louis Rams, that no stores
had the t-shirts printed up, cause they got burn when they had the
St.Louis Stallions t-shirt printed when the NFL was expanding and
St.Louis got shut out.
Sonny Libbick of the Colorado St. Rams said his reason for not going to
Miami was that, the coaching is only good for 4/5 years. That he
wanted to stayed in Colorado for along time. I understood his answer,
i thought it was a good answer.
|
9.3349 | Sanctions? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Wed Jan 18 1995 12:26 | 5 |
| Minor rathole - Just wondering if the Pell Grant scandal and great
condo-on-the-beach for low rent scam are scaring away potential coaches
from the Miami job?
UMDan
|
9.3350 | that and more | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Jan 18 1995 12:35 | 9 |
| Lubick alluded to this and other continuing investigations in Coral
Gables.
I doubt that this is realy a reason, though. Miami is a high-pressured
football factory. Any coach coming in knows that he'll have to have the
Hurricanes way up there in the Top 10 to keep his job. That alone might
not help, what with the semi-tradition of winning the MNC at Miami.
TTom
|
9.3351 | TTom's right | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Jan 18 1995 12:51 | 28 |
| > <<< Note 9.3350 by HBAHBA::HAAS "dingle lingo" >>>
> -< that and more >-
>
>Lubick alluded to this and other continuing investigations in Coral
>Gables.
>
>I doubt that this is realy a reason, though. Miami is a high-pressured
>football factory. Any coach coming in knows that he'll have to have the
>Hurricanes way up there in the Top 10 to keep his job. That alone might
>not help, what with the semi-tradition of winning the MNC at Miami.
>
>TTom
TTom,
Last night he was being interviewed on the Sports Zoo and he said
basically what you said.
1. When he was an assistant down there, there was a scandal every
year so it was no big deal.
2. He said that the pressure down there is tremendous, if you have
one loss you're in big trouble. He even mentioned that at some schools,
ND for instance, you can lose 4-5 games per year and not have to worry
about your job.
Kevin
Now, back to the NFL....
|
9.3352 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Jan 18 1995 12:59 | 20 |
| Let's see, a month ago, CSU goes all out to offer Lubick the best contract
it could possibly offer any coach. Lubick balks at signing because of
rumors that the Miami job will be available soon. Lubick was the Miami
defensive coordinator and is well known and liked in Coral Gables.
Lubick interviews for the job and is told that he's their man and the
other interviews will just be formalities. 2 days later, Lubick takes his
name out of the Miami hat and signs the long term deal with CSU.
I have suspicions that there's more to this than we've heard. Most
likely, Lubick is expecting Miami to be put on probation. There's little
upside potential at Miami but lot's of downside potential.
Another thing to consider: at Miami, if ya lose 2 games you're considered
a failure. After what Lubick did at CSU the last 2 years, he'll always
be well liked in Colorado. CSU also has a lot of upside potential. Recently,
the newspapers were talking about how the Colorado universities will need
to grow because of the rapid increase in population. CSU is more easily
expandable than CU.
Keith
|
9.3353 | dollars | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Jan 18 1995 13:06 | 8 |
| Lubick also mentioned that the "offer" from Miami was $200K less that
Fort Collins.
I got the impression from this far away that Lubick's decision was based
a lot no Miami indecision. Lubick was in a sorta limbo, not knowing about
Miami and not doing his job at CSU.
TTom
|
9.3354 | There's one very big upside: stepping stone to the NFL | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 18 1995 13:39 | 22 |
|
> I have suspicions that there's more to this than we've heard. Most
> likely, Lubick is expecting Miami to be put on probation. There's little
> upside potential at Miami but lot's of downside potential.
On the other hand, if you have really huge aspirations beyond mere
security, you can follow the Dennis Erickson formula to the big haul:
achieve some moderate but legitimate success at a school where little
is expected, build the reputation up further by getting out when the
gettings' good by taking the Miami job where more success is all but
guaranteed, and become declared the kind of hot-property "jeenyus" in
your specific department that can demand a $5M+ NFL deal.
In the specific case of Erickson, I don't know if he will or won't make
a good NFL coach, but how can anyone really know to justify that kind
of upper-percentile contract? Certainly the on-the-field tightness and
cohesiveness has not been there at Miami the last two years. They've
been as sloppy as any talented major-college team I've seen in that
span...
glenn
|
9.3355 | maybe it aint the coaching? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Wed Jan 18 1995 13:43 | 8 |
| Miami looks liek it succeeds with the speed and other physical talents of
the athletes that get there.
Schellenburgerbergurburgher, Jimmy Johnson and now Erickson have all been
successful with very similar teams. There's no reason to doubt that the
nexted guy caint succeed.
TTom
|
9.3356 | Ooh - my arm hurts from patting myself on the back! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass - #1 again!!! | Thu Jan 19 1995 14:14 | 8 |
| Sorry I haven't been in here this week, but I wanted to congratulate
myself for my excellent predictions this past weekend. To refresh your
memories, I had these picks:
San Diego 16, Pittsburgh 13
San Francisco 31, Dallas 28
NAZZ
|
9.3357 | more 'predictions'? | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Jan 19 1995 14:15 | 5 |
| Sorry Nazz but San Fran covered.
Have you picked the BC-Kansas St Bowl yet? ;-)
TTom
|
9.3358 | Vegas was fun, but my wife and I both lost big | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass - #1 again!!! | Thu Jan 19 1995 14:27 | 4 |
| I must admit I dropped $20 at the futures book at Bally's when I took
the Patriots to win the AFC title!
NAZZ
|
9.3359 | early wagering | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Thu Jan 19 1995 14:42 | 7 |
| A friend of mine just got back from Vegas.
Lasted Saturday, afore either conference championship was settled, he bet
the NFC minus 12 over the AFC. Now that the teams are known, the line's
near 20. Not a bad swing.
TTom
|
9.3360 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Fri Jan 20 1995 08:46 | 15 |
| > Al (King of the one-liners) Cote.
>
> A former colleague of mine, and all around good Joe. May he rest in
> peace. A life cut too short.
>
> Thanks,
>
> RTG
Sorry. I remembered that someone else left us way too early, but I couldn't
remember who.
'Saw
|
9.3361 | I was moved | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Fri Jan 20 1995 09:52 | 10 |
| I'm a latecomer in two senses: 1, I haven't been in here since Monday;
2, I didn't get into this notesfile until after all those noters had
left (except Kev; I was RONning then).
But I just have to thank you for .3332, 'Saw--a fine piece of writing.
Steve
P.S.: this notesfile is *still* one of a kind, and I'm delighted to
have made the acquaintance of all you good folks in sprotsland.
|
9.3362 | :^) | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Fri Jan 20 1995 10:29 | 4 |
|
Sucking up will get you nowhere.
Claybone
|
9.3363 | NFL Players o' the Year | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 20 1995 12:42 | 11 |
| The NFL Players Association has voted on its awards for thised year.
NFC AFC
MVP Barry Sanders Dan Marino
Defensive Lineman Reggie White Bruce Smith
Offensive Lineman William Roaf Richmond Webb
Linebacker Ken Harvey Junior Seau, Kevin Greene
Defensive Back Deion Sanders Rod Woodson
Special Teams Mel Gray Eric Metcalf
Offensive Rookie Erric Rhett Marshall Faulk
Defensive Rookie Bryant Young Antonio Langham
|
9.3364 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Fri Jan 20 1995 13:00 | 3 |
|
Is that number 34 pick in the draft, Errict Rhett, as the
NFC offensive Rookie Of The Year? Who'd a thunk it?
|
9.3365 | Only You!! | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Fri Jan 20 1995 14:23 | 2 |
| You would have Tommy!
|
9.3366 | Flutie to stay in CFL | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 20 1995 14:35 | 11 |
| Well one thing is almost certain.
Doug Flutie most likely will not be playing again in the NFL. He just
signed a 5-year deal, for a mil plus per year. Flutie says that this will
likely take him to the end of his football career.
For a while, there might have been a glimmer of hope for the teams that
need a winning QB, such as Cleveland, the Giants, etc. Now, that hope is
gone.
TTom
|
9.3367 | | CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Fri Jan 20 1995 14:43 | 6 |
| |For a while, there might have been a glimmer of hope for the teams that
|need a winning QB, such as Cleveland, the Giants, etc. Now, that hope is
|gone.
If Flutie had signed with the Giants, our pal JD would have
gone into cardiac arrest...
|
9.3368 | this too shall pass | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 20 1995 14:47 | 6 |
| And Saw woulda been drinkin heavily and beatin up on poor Kim even afore
she moved in ;-).
For a mil, the Panthers mighta been interested in him.
TTom
|
9.3369 | Good Luck Doug; | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Fri Jan 20 1995 16:23 | 8 |
| So when do we go down to Baltimore to see Flutie - can we get an Os
game in the same weekend?
I guess that's where Doug was fated. Apparently his strike appearance
became the biggest factor in his leaving the nfl. That's a good lesson
for any baseball strike-breakers to keep in mind.
|
9.3370 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Fri Jan 20 1995 16:41 | 9 |
|
> I guess that's where Doug was fated. Apparently his strike appearance
> became the biggest factor in his leaving the nfl. That's a good lesson
> for any baseball strike-breakers to keep in mind.
Of course, Steve "Sonny" Bono broke in during the strike, if I remember
correctly, and hasn't done too poorly...
Joe
|
9.3371 | packscab | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 20 1995 16:48 | 8 |
| Another scab who's made a pile of money is Eric Kramer. He played for the
Falcons and did quite well. Good enough to get about $8mil from Chicago.
I was kinda surprised that Kramer wasn't on the dispersal draft list by
the Bears. I guess Wannstedt was afraid to lose him and the unsigned
Steve Walsh.
TTom
|
9.3372 | I guess Kramer played a little with Vikes | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Fri Jan 20 1995 17:19 | 6 |
| Exactly what has either done aside from getting $money?
Flutie's appearance was much heralded and drew a big crowd and may have
been seen as a factor in ending strike. Pat Sullivan used Doug badly
and when players dropped balls and went offside to make Flutie look
bad a fast firing would have helped.
|
9.3373 | some playoffs wins with Detroit | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Fri Jan 20 1995 17:24 | 4 |
| Kramer's career peaked in Detroit the year they faced the Skins in the
NFC title game. Along the way they beat Dallas.
TTom
|
9.3374 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Jan 20 1995 18:11 | 4 |
9.3375 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Fri Jan 20 1995 18:26 | 6 |
| And the nfl will never prove to me that Flutie couldn't have played
there. I just see a lot of clowns and your Belichick is the mold who
are set in there ways with the imagination of rocks.
You dawgs should've been begging modell to sign flutie; talk about a
team destined to be mired at .500-.550 seasons for years.
|
9.3376 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Sat Jan 21 1995 08:52 | 9 |
9.3377 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Sun Jan 22 1995 22:29 | 3 |
| Saw, were you thinking of The Bible of Boxing?
Mark.
|
9.3378 | My point, no? | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Mon Jan 23 1995 11:21 | 14 |
| Groaner are you then in agreement that .550 seasons and wild card
qualifying is all you can hope for. Your 11-5 was indeed > than our
10-6 and I don't blame you for being thrilled at the prospect of a
similar year next year to this.
And you should have been nicer to us objective Pat's fans since in my
case I've rooted for the Browns for years but held back this year and
as your buddy Tcm will be the first to attest I got his Rangers into
the Cup final last year and could've got you past de Burgh.
And I recall taking pride in bringing the Browns back from elimination
against the Jets back about 89/90 but it was beyond my power to help
them against the doncs. I've never been able to anything for or
against Denver, must be the altitude.
|
9.3379 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Free Whitey Bulger! | Mon Jan 23 1995 12:51 | 12 |
| � Flutie's appearance was much heralded and drew a big crowd and may have
� been seen as a factor in ending strike. Pat Sullivan used Doug badly
� and when players dropped balls and went offside to make Flutie look
� bad a fast firing would have helped.
The Flutie Jihad lives! Sorry Bill, but Doug is where he belongs,
in the CFL, and the Patriots have a quarterback who could make them a
legitimate contender (even though he is not a Boston College alumn). Once
opposing defenses figured out to play Flutie for the run and force him to
pass, the jig was up and his days were numbered.
/Don
|
9.3380 | You would have to get me going on that one | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Mon Jan 23 1995 13:48 | 12 |
| Defenses adopted a very successful strategy against Doug, that of
having the big defensive ends and tackles defer their rush and instead
concentrate on knocking the ball down. Ironically the Pats (current)
used this same method quite abit this year.
When a teams employs that type of defense the offensive coodinator has
to adjust his strategy. Flutie was forced to be a drop back pocket
passer; 49er style moving pockets would have been much more his style.
Count me in on the pro-Flutie, sorry I missed that Jihad as well as the
Bird one where I would have been a staunch anti-Bird-as-God ally to
that small but doughty crew.
|
9.3381 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Jan 23 1995 15:12 | 5 |
|
> Defenses adopted a very successful strategy against Doug
Yeah, let Ray Berry control Flutie's offense and don't worry about it
after that! :^)
|
9.3382 | question | BSS::MENDEZ | | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:01 | 2 |
| so who stopped flutie at chicago?
|
9.3383 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:09 | 11 |
| As I remember, Flutie didn't do all that bad in the NFL. People kept saying
he couldn't play but he did and when he played the Patriots did rather well. As
for the Bears, wasn't he playing behind McMann back then?
At any rate regardless if he failed in the NFL because he couldn't play or
because everyone refused to believe that he could play, he's done very well in
the CFL and it makes sense for him to finish his career up there.
Then no doubt it will be off to one of the networks to cover the NFL.
George
|
9.3384 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:14 | 10 |
| Was he stopped? He played some games for Ditka, Ditka liked him. He
was a rookie and second year player behind MacMahon whose main problem
then was injury but otherwise highly rated.
Flutie was waived to the Pats per Sullivan's request, partly to boost
attendance.
Ditka has never had much luck with quarterbacks other than the singular
McMahon. Harbaugh and others have crashed under Mike's impatient
rejime.
|
9.3385 | Tobin thinks he's pretty though... | SALEM::DODA | Stop Global Whining | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:22 | 3 |
| Harbaugh has crashed under every regime....
daryll
|
9.3386 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Free Whitey Bulger! | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:25 | 7 |
| Given the lack of quality NFL quarterbacks today I find it hard
to believe that if someone thought Flutie could play in the NFL
they wouldn't give him a chance. When a coach's job is at stake
he might ignore the double secret blackmail list that only Doug
Flutie is on and live a little dangerously.
/Don
|
9.3387 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:34 | 9 |
| I'm sure the coaches believed that Flutie couldn't play and maybe he couldn't
but the one thing I never understood was if he couldn't play why was the
Patriots record so much better with him in the game than with him not in the
game?
Granted it was a short period of time, 4 or 5 games, and no doubt there were
other factors but he seemed to move the ball.
George
|
9.3388 | | SALEM::DODA | Stop Global Whining | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:46 | 8 |
| <<< Note 9.3387 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
> Granted it was a short period of time, 4 or 5 games, and no doubt there were
>other factors but he seemed to move the ball.
No one ever said he was unable to handoff well.
daryll
|
9.3389 | The big R word, or don't dare to be different | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:46 | 12 |
| I don't find it hard to believe at all. The coaching fraternity is
very tight and cliquey (ask that RI reporter) and losing conventionally
will always see a coach rehired in some capacity. But to sign Flutie
who's not 6'3 and up simply because he will probably win more games
than anyone else and take you to the playoffs is still a big risk and
the R word scares those guys.
There's never been a coach's blacklist but why have a player,
especially a qb who's labeled when you have excuses not to. But the
question really is the reverse of yours; Why not sign the guy who's had
the success of Theisman and Moon? It's not really for the Flutie
supporters to answer.
|
9.3390 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:47 | 4 |
| I remember him passing. Also, if he were just handing off, then why did the
team do better when he played then when he didn't play.
George
|
9.3391 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Free Whitey Bulger! | Mon Jan 23 1995 16:56 | 6 |
| Gotcha, NFL coaches are toast if they're different. You can
punch out an offensive coordinator, publically trash your owner/boss
walk away with burnout, sign million dollar bust quarterbacks, but
if you give Doug Flutie a tryout, you're HISTORY!
/Don
|
9.3392 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | It's all in the outcome | Mon Jan 23 1995 17:19 | 8 |
| Ironically I gave some thought to your coach question and came up with
Phoenix. If Buddy knew Flutie he'd love to have him as Doug played
very hard nosed and would be one of the few qbs who could play special
teams (Yes, he threw his share of interceptions but one thing I liked
was when he threw one he gleefully went after the culprit unlike the
majority who wave the db into the endzone).
Why weren't any of these bobosaurae interested in Charley Ward?
|
9.3393 | | SALEM::DODA | Stop Global Whining | Tue Jan 24 1995 08:23 | 6 |
| My recollection is that Flutie put the ball up a dozen times per
game at best. Those were John Stephens' career years, the few
that he had. He had an above avg running game and the offense was
geared to it. It was the '94 bears, with the strong D.
daryll
|
9.3394 | Come on.... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Jan 24 1995 11:13 | 8 |
| You gotta be kidding... Al Davis would sign flutie in a minute if
he thouhgt he could play and win ball games. DeBartalo would sign
Flutie if he thought he could play. Sheesh the bozo in Phoenix would
sign him if he thought he could play. That is not to belittle Doug,
but the guy was not ready for the NFL. Who knows he might be a good
backup somewhere. Don't forget Flutie wans to start and that appears
to be the CFL where he will start and be a star.
|
9.3395 | I HATE McMahon... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Tue Jan 24 1995 11:21 | 14 |
| | was a rookie and second year player behind MacMahon whose main problem
| then was injury but otherwise highly rated.
^
You missed a word. OVER
Flutie has a perfect gig in Canada, and HE probably has
no interest in the NFL.
My favorite memory of his year as Pats QB:
Idiot McMahon made a comment during the week about
Flutie being "America's Midget". The Pats then go out
on Sunday, and kick da Bears' butts.
=Bob=
|
9.3396 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jan 24 1995 11:57 | 4 |
9.3397 | There's a logical fallacy there(begging the question?) | AKOCOA::BREEN | I was all right for awhile.. | Tue Jan 24 1995 12:24 | 2 |
| If you think he "failed" and disagree with the rebuttal so far you're
two cents is welcome
|
9.3398 | Part owner of his club? | PCBUOA::EHS | | Tue Jan 24 1995 12:43 | 8 |
|
Speaking of Flutie, Is it true that he owns 8% of the ballclub he plays
for in the CFL (Calgary??)? I also heard that he may own up to 15%
after his 5 year contract exhausts.
IMO - He has definitely found "his place" in the CFL.
ED
|
9.3399 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 24 1995 12:51 | 9 |
| For what ever reason, Flutie would never be much more than a 2nd string QB in
the NFL or even a 3rd string holding for the kicker. But for some reason he's
got the right blend of talent to do really well in the CFL. It's not clear
that the other kick holders in the NFL would do as well as he's doing up there.
At any rate, he'll be back in the NFL some day as an announcer. I wouldn't be
surprised to see him take over Monday Night football when Frank retires.
George
|
9.3401 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Jan 24 1995 13:09 | 29 |
|
Everyon keeps saying "the reason he could never make it," or "he failed
because..." Grrrr.
And you have to ask how so many coaches can collectively act so stodgy?
Same way so many fans can fans collectively refuse to see the facts...
I see people who will bare-faced tell me "How could 28 GM's all be wrong?"
and then not answer when asked if they were all wrong about 1) using
replacement players 2) not hiring black QB's earlier.
Btw, Patriots 1988:
o Steve Grogan starts sthe year with a win. Then loses 3 straight.
o Tom Ramsey comes in for week 5 against Indy. He eventually gets
pulled and Doug replaces him to win the game with a 4th quarter rally.
o Doug wins 6 of the next 8 games, despite Berry designing a game plan
totally opposite to his strengths.
o Berry switches to Eason. Bizarre to pull a winning QB, but Berry
again re-iterates that he doesn't like being told what to do by
management (Flutie was brought in to get fans). Berry proves this
point again by refusing to hire offensive and devensive coordinators.
o We barely beat TB, and lose our playoff chances in the next loss to
Denver.
28 GM's were wrong. Flutie could win in the NFL. It's not a guess.
It's a fact.
- Sean
|
9.3402 | | ROCK::HUBER | Most folks call them green onions, but they're really scallions | Tue Jan 24 1995 13:18 | 29 |
|
> 28 GM's were wrong. Flutie could win in the NFL. It's not a guess.
> It's a fact.
Hmmm... lots of different arguments posed here...
1) Could Flutie win in the NFL?
Well, yes. He did win.
2) Can Flutie win in the NFL now?
Hard to say. I suspect so, in the right situation.
3) Was Flutie a good NFL quarterback?
Also hard to say. Winning isn't everything; if it was, we'd have to
say Vinny Testaverde is the third best QB in the AFC. I don't follow
the Pats closely enough to know how the rest of the team looked at the
time, but given that they'd been to the Super Bowl recently, it's at
least possible that the supporting cast carried a mediorce-or-worse QB.
4) Would Flutie be a good NFL QB now?
Hmmm... I certainly wouldn't give up Young for him, but if my QB was
someone like, say, Testaverde, I wouldn't mind Flutie as at least a
short term QB.
Joe
|
9.3403 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Tue Jan 24 1995 13:27 | 6 |
| > He's got the looks but he also has the personality of a houseplant.
He should fit right in just fine with the current crew then.
billl
|
9.3404 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jan 24 1995 16:00 | 14 |
|
Certain Bostonians just won't let this Flutie thing go. They
like to forget when Flutie was in Chicago and Mike Ditka damn
near ripped his head off of his shoulders because Dougie would
panic every time the defense even hinted at a blitz and Dougie
would change the play. Fluite was much better off in New England
where his role was more limited and the Patsies had Jon Stephens
running over people. The Pats won "despite Berry designing a game
plan opposite" Doug's strenghts isn't quite right. If they had
played to Doug's strengths, they would have lost. Berry was no
genius but he was smart enough to know that he couldn't ride
Flutie very far.
|
9.3405 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | CanyourollmeanotherBullDurhamplease | Tue Jan 24 1995 16:13 | 3 |
|
Who's Doug Flutie?
|
9.3406 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Jan 24 1995 16:24 | 5 |
|
>> Who's Doug Flutie?
A shorter Steve Walsh.
|
9.3407 | Heisman envy? | AKOCOA::BREEN | I was all right for awhile.. | Tue Jan 24 1995 17:03 | 6 |
| Ditka was ripping more than Flutie in those days including a certain
mister Dent (not Bucky). Mike in his calmer moments lauded Doug, at
least effort-wise.
My question is, other than mere height what is the big difference
between Flutie's record CFL performances and say Moon's.
|
9.3408 | From Gaulke | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Networks Sales & Marketing | Tue Jan 24 1995 17:02 | 20 |
| Date: 24-JAN-1995 13:44:06.01
From: BSS::US3RMC::"[email protected]" "Steven Gaulke"
Subj: hello
To: jeff riggen <bss::riggen>
Post it in sports.note:
Chargers in a laugher.
% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: from inet-gw-3.pa.dec.com by us3rmc.pa.dec.com (5.65/rmc-22feb94) id AA02492; Tue, 24 Jan 95 12:46:45 -080
% Received: from gatekeeper.mcimail.com by inet-gw-3.pa.dec.com (5.65/10Aug94) id AA02894; Tue, 24 Jan 95 12:43:42 -080
% Received: by gatekeeper.mcimail.com (5.65/fma-120691); id AA16027; Tue, 24 Jan 95 20:47:19 GM
% Received: from mcimail.com by mailgate.mcimail.com id ba02732; 24 Jan 95 20:40 WE
% Date: Tue, 24 Jan 95 12:01 EST
% From: Steven Gaulke <[email protected]>
% To: jeff riggen <bss::riggen>
% Subject: hello
% Message-Id: <41950124170114/[email protected]>
|
9.3409 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jan 24 1995 17:41 | 7 |
9.3410 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Tue Jan 24 1995 18:13 | 6 |
|
And judging by groaner's choice of NFL teams, he's a keen judge of CFL
talent. 8^)
brews
|
9.3411 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Jan 24 1995 21:30 | 18 |
|
> Certain Bostonians just won't let this Flutie thing go.
Well, I don't let the Flutie thing go (when prompted), but I'm
certainly not a Bostonian. Hate the Celts and went to Syracuse when
Flutie was on BC, so I was rooting consistently against Doug then.
> like to forget when Flutie was in Chicago and Mike Ditka damn
> near ripped his head off of his shoulders because Dougie would
> panic every time the defense even hinted at a blitz and Dougie
> would change the play. Fluite was much better off in New England
Yeah, where he took revenge on said Ditka by throwing a TD bomb the
first play of the game against Da Bears. Revenge for the Super Bowl,
Revenge for treating him like crap on Chitown, and best of all, Ditka
went down for the count after that game.
- Sean
|
9.3412 | talent wise Schlichter >> Flutie | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jan 24 1995 23:20 | 10 |
9.3413 | We got smoked but at least we danced | AD::HEATH | Pitchers and catchers report when??? | Wed Jan 25 1995 07:32 | 12 |
|
Paul...
What does a second rate leauge have anything to do with New
Englander's knowing anything about football? I would venture
to say we know as much/little as any other fan of any other NFL
team. What we New Englanders know and Clevelandites don't is
the feeling of being in a Super Bowl. I could describe it for
you if you want.
Jerry
|
9.3414 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jan 25 1995 07:59 | 4 |
9.3415 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Jan 25 1995 08:02 | 7 |
9.3416 | What Do You Think? | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Wed Jan 25 1995 08:46 | 7 |
| ********** Question of the Day **********
Can Alcorn States quarterback, Steve "Air" McNair be a
franchise quarterback in the NFL? ESPN's draft analyst
Mel Kiper feels "Air" McNair will be taken in by the
Houston Oilers in the first round.
|
9.3417 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | UMass > UConn | Wed Jan 25 1995 08:51 | 9 |
|
I doubt it. McNair may have the tools but them ole coaching woes about
black QB's (on the same blacklist as Doug Flutie) the failure of Andre
Ware and the lack 1-A experience has me thinking he's a 2 nd or 3 rd
rounder. I don't agree with it but that's how I see it happening. If
the Oilers are dead set on taking a QB I think they'll take Collins
or Chad May.......
mike
|
9.3418 | MEL KIPER IS O-U-T | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Wed Jan 25 1995 09:05 | 9 |
| I agree with you 100%, I have seen McNair play once and maybe
I shouldn't make a judgement based on that but people are
comparing him to Warren Moon and Randall Cunningham. He does
have great arm strength and he hasn't seen defensive backs
like Deion, Woodson, Hurst, McDaniel, or Eric Allen. In the game
I saw, he primarily passed out of the shotgun . . . on every down!
You won't see many QB's taken high in the draft this year, this
will be a year for BIG lineman and RB's.
|
9.3419 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | jan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!! | Wed Jan 25 1995 09:18 | 7 |
|
McNair = Andre Ware
Good College QB, not a NFLer though
|
9.3420 | Let's keep away from racial comparisons, please | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass - #1 again!!! | Wed Jan 25 1995 09:41 | 9 |
| It's very interesting to me to see people comparing McNair to Warren
Moon, Randall Cunningham, and in the last note, Andre Ware. It
couldn't be just because these four quarterbacks are black, is it?
IMO, it's pretty tough to compare McNair to anybody, since most of us
have only seen him play in at most one college game and one all-star
game. The little I've seen of him he reminds me of Dave Kreig.
NAZZ
|
9.3421 | they didn't beat Da Bears in a preseason game 1st? | SALEM::DODA | Stop Global Whining | Wed Jan 25 1995 09:47 | 18 |
| <<< Note 9.3411 by WONDER::REILLY "Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375" >>>
> Yeah, where he took revenge on said Ditka by throwing a TD bomb the
> first play of the game against Da Bears. Revenge for the Super Bowl,
> Revenge for treating him like crap on Chitown, and best of all, Ditka
> went down for the count after that game.
Whoa boy, I bet that really did. That Super Bowl title?
Forgotten. We've lost to Doug Flutie and the Patriots. That SB
title means nothing now, the Patriots have beaten us in a
regular season game a couple years later.
Doug Flutie, redeemer of New England's pride.
Get Real.
daryll
|
9.3422 | Geeze, some guys have wicked short fuses... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Wed Jan 25 1995 10:03 | 20 |
| | Whoa boy, I bet that really did. That Super Bowl title?
| Forgotten. We've lost to Doug Flutie and the Patriots. That SB
| title means nothing now, the Patriots have beaten us in a
| regular season game a couple years later.
Well when my 2� year old daughter is misunderstood, she
has a way of expressign it that is clearly appropriate
here: "NO, NO, NO, NO".
The regular season win over da Bears was, in no way shape
or mannor, revenge for the shameful bashing the Pats took
in Super Bowl XXXZZZQQQ (or whatever it was). The win was
sweet revenge on Jim McMahon's derrogitory (sp?) statements
about Flutie being "America's Midget" the week of the game.
That's all I was saying.
Daryll, maybe if you show up at the OPP tonight, REK will
let you borrow the clue he bought at K_Mart.
=Bob=
|
9.3423 | | SALEM::DODA | Stop Global Whining | Wed Jan 25 1995 10:09 | 21 |
| Bob,
First off, I do not have a short fuse. Second, I wasn't replying to your note.
Third read what was written below. It was a silly statement to
make, wouldn't you agree?
Bowling night tonight, won't be there. Waiting for a sale on
clues before I pick one up.
thanks
Daryll
<<< Note 9.3411 by WONDER::REILLY "Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375" >>>
Yeah, where he took revenge on said Ditka by throwing a TD bomb the
first play of the game against Da Bears. ** Revenge for the Super Bowl,**
Revenge for treating him like crap on Chitown, and best of all, Ditka
went down for the count after that game.
- Sean
|
9.3424 | Oh, in that case, I agree... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Wed Jan 25 1995 10:12 | 8 |
| Mea Culpa Daryll.
And I know you don't have a short fuse, I was kinda joking.
Let me know when that sale is, I'll go pick myself up a
clue, I guess mine is worn out.
=Bob=
|
9.3425 | Sheesh, the guy's point was fairly clear... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 25 1995 10:29 | 14 |
|
By the same token, someone should be able to use a little bit of
artistic license with a simple phrase like "revenge for the Super Bowl"
without having his sanity questioned. I knew what the guy meant, and
it wasn't that the game would literally make people forget that game.
I was at the game, and the fact is that it was a very big win in a
very meaningful game for both teams. For the Pats, the biggest win of
the 7 long seasons preceding this one. That's not saying a whole lot
but 7 years between really big wins is still 7 years. I'll never
forget ol' Coach Dikka ranting and raving at his very worst on the
sideline in front of us...
glenn
|
9.3426 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Jan 25 1995 12:02 | 12 |
|
>> By the same token, someone should be able to use a little bit of
>> artistic license
A little bit, yes. But stating that winning a regular season game,
in any way, shape or form makes up for the disappointment and hum-
liation of suffereing the worst SB defeat ever (at that time), is
a whole lot of poetic license. In final analysis that win over the
Bears meant nothing. The SB is however what they all play for.
No comparison.
|
9.3427 | Go back to the papers of the time, "revenge" was big, in fun... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 25 1995 12:50 | 25 |
|
>> By the same token, someone should be able to use a little bit of
>> artistic license
>
> A little bit, yes. But stating that winning a regular season game,
> in any way, shape or form makes up for the disappointment and hum-
> liation of suffereing the worst SB defeat ever (at that time), is
> a whole lot of poetic license. In final analysis that win over the
> Bears meant nothing. The SB is however what they all play for.
> No comparison.
In the final analysis it didn't mean much (I wouldn't say "nothing",
or you run the risk of saying the Pats' entire existence has meant
nothing). But at the time the game most certainly was built up as a
"let's show these Bears something" and it wasn't because the Bears
were just a great team. There was a revenge factor. When the original
author threw "revenge for the Super Bowl" into a list of factors
including Flutie's return engagement against the guy who cut him I
knew exactly what it meant because he didn't make it up; that's
how it played here at the time. Nothing terribly parochial about
it either; you see this kind of harmless talk all the time, everywhere,
without anyone seriously believing that it equates to a Super Bowl win.
glenn
|
9.3428 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Jan 25 1995 13:53 | 7 |
|
Geez, some people sure take things over-literally when it suits their
cause. Anyway, thanks for noticing the exaggeration, glenn. The
rest... lighten up. I was just referencing the fact that the game
got 3 bonuses for the price of one.
|
9.3429 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Jan 25 1995 14:50 | 10 |
|
>> But at the time the game most certainly was built up as a
>> "let's show these Bears something"
Yup, we sure showed them. Maybe they'll think twice next time
before they beat the living hell out of us in a SB. I'm sure
that the Boston media might have played that angle up but it
really is/was quite silly.
|
9.3430 | SUPER BOWL XXIX | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Fri Jan 27 1995 06:41 | 19 |
| NFC will make it 11 straight Super Bowl victories . . .
San Diego Chargers 19
F
San Francisco 49ers 38
DECADE OF DOMINANCE
1985 San Francisco 38, Miami 16
1986 Chicago 46, NEW ENGLAND 10
1987 New York Giants 39, Denver 20
1988 Washington 42, Denver 10
1989 San Francisco 20, Cincinnati 16
1990 San Francisco 55, Denver 10
1991 New York Giants 20, Buffalo 19
1992 Washington 37, Buffalo 24
1993 Dallas 52, Buffalo 17
1994 Dallas 30, Buffalo 13
|
9.3431 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Fri Jan 27 1995 12:30 | 2 |
| Niners 46
bolts 24
|
9.3432 | Game RECAP!!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | jan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!! | Mon Jan 30 1995 08:53 | 169 |
| San Diego 26, San Francisco 49
Game Recap
Final 1st 2nd 3rd 4th Total
San Diego 7 3 8 8 26
San Francisco 14 14 14 7 49
Scoring Summary
1st Qtr: SFO - TD, Jerry Rice 44 yd pass from Steve Young (Doug Brien
kick), 1:24. Drive: 3 plays, 59 yards in 1:24. Key
plays: San Francisco starts drive on own 41 after
15-yard face mask penalty on Chargers D Miller on
opening kickoff; S Young 11-yard pass to Taylor to
San Diego 44.
SFO - TD, Ricky Watters 51 yd pass from Steve Young (Doug
Brien kick), 4:55. Drive: 4 plays, 79 yards in
1:53. Key plays: S Young 21-yard run on 3rd-and-3
to San Francisco 49.
SDG - TD, Natrone Means 1 yd run (John Carney kick), 12:16.
Drive: 13 plays, 78 yards in 7:21. Key plays:
Humphries 17-yard pass to Harmon on 3rd-and-4 to
San Francisco 43; Harmon 10-yard run on 3rd-and-1
to San Francisco 24; Pass Interference on Forty
Niners Sanders in end zone gives San Diego a
first-and-goal at the 1.
2nd Qtr: SFO - TD, William Floyd 5 yd pass from Steve Young (Doug
Brien kick), 1:58. Drive: 9 plays, 69 yards in
2:44. Key plays: S Young 19-yard pass to Rice San
Francisco 49; S Young 15-yard run to San Diego 15;
S Young 1-yard run on 3rd-and-1 to San Diego 5.
SFO - TD, Ricky Watters 8 yd pass from Steve Young (Doug
Brien kick), 10:16. Drive: 9 plays, 49 yards in
4:51. Key plays: S Young 5-for-6 for 39 yards on
drive; S Young 11-yard pass to Rice to San Diego
27; S Young 8-yard pass to Rice to San Diego 15;
Floyd 6-yard run to San Diego 9.
SDG - FG, John Carney 31 yd, 13:16. Drive: 8 plays, 62 yards
in 3:00. Key plays: Humphries 17-yard pass to Seay
to San Diego 44; Jefferson 10-yard run on reverse
to San Francisco 46; Humphries 33-yard pass to
Bieniemy to San Francisco 13.
3rd Qtr: SFO - TD, Ricky Watters 9 yd run (Doug Brien kick), 5:25.
Drive: 7 plays, 62 yards in 3:45. Key plays: S
Young 16-yard pass to Rice to San Diego 46; S
Young 21-yard pass to Rice on 3rd-and-17 to San
Diego 32; S Young 16-yard pass to Taylor to San
Diego 16; S Young 3-for-3 for 53 yards on drive.
SFO - TD, Jerry Rice 15 yd pass from Steve Young (Doug Brien
kick), 11:42. Drive: 10 plays, 67 yards in 4:07.
Key plays: 22-yard pass interference on San
Diego's Gordon on 3rd-and-14 to Chargers 38;
Watters 13-yard run to San Diego 25; S Young
13-yard run to San Diego 12.
SDG - TD, Andre Coleman 98 yd kickoff return (Stan Humphries
pass to Mark Seay for two-point conversion),
11:59.
4th Qtr: SFO - TD, Jerry Rice 7 yd pass from Steve Young (Doug Brien
kick), 1:11. Drive: 6 plays, 32 yards in 1:19. Key
plays: D Hall and Woodall stop San Diego's Means
for a 4-yard loss on 4th-and-1 to give San
Francisco the ball on the Chargers 32; Watters
13-yard run on 3rd-and-2 to San Diego 11.
SDG - TD, Tony Martin 30 yd pass from Stan Humphries (Stan
Humphries pass to Alfred Pupunu for two-point
conversion), 12:35. Drive: 8 plays, 67 yards in
1:56. Key plays: Humphries 12-yard pass to Martin
to San Francisco 43; Humphries 22-yard pass to
Seay to San Francisco 30; Humphries 5-for-7 for 76
yards on drive.
Team Statistics
SDG SFO
First downs 20 28
Rushing 5 10
Passing 14 17
Penalty 1 1
3rd-down efficiency 6-16 7-13
4th-down efficiency 0-4 0-0
Total net yards 354 449
Total plays 76 73
Average gain 4.7 6.2
Net yards rushing 67 133
Rushes 19 32
Average per rush 3.5 4.2
Net yards passing 287 316
Completed-attempted 27-55 25-38
Yards per pass 5.0 7.7
Sacked-yards lost 2-18 3-15
Had intercepted 3 0
Punts-average 4-48.8 5-39.8
Return yardage 243 76
Punts-returns 3-1 2-12
Kickoffs-returns 8-242 4-48
Interceptions-returns 0-0 3-16
Penalties-yards 6-63 3-18
Fumbles-lost 1-0 2-0
Time of possession 28:29 31:31
Player Statistics
Missed field goals: San Francisco (Doug Brien 47).
San Diego rushing: Natrone Means 13-33, Ronnie Harmon 2-10, Shawn
Jefferson 1-10, Gale Gilbert 1-8, Eric Bieniemy 1-3, Stan Humphries 1-3.
San Francisco rushing: Steve Young 5-49, Ricky Watters 15-47,
William Floyd 9-32, Jerry Rice 1-10, Dexter Carter 2-minus 5.
San Diego passing: Stan Humphries 24-49 for 275 yards, 2 INT, 1
TD, Gale Gilbert 3-6 for 30 yards, 1 INT, 0 TD.
San Francisco passing: Steve Young 24-36 for 325 yards, 0 INT, 6
TD, Bill Musgrave 1-1 for 6 yards, 0 INT, 0 TD, Elvis Grbac 0-1 for 0
yards, 0 INT, 0 TD.
San Diego receiving: Ronnie Harmon 8-68, Mark Seay 7-75, Alfred
Pupunu 4-48, Tony Martin 3-59, Shawn Jefferson 2-15, Eric Bieniemy 1-33,
Natrone Means 1-4, Duane Young 1-3.
San Francisco receiving: Jerry Rice 10-149, John Taylor 4-43,
William Floyd 4-26, Ricky Watters 3-61, Brent Jones 2-41, Ted Popson
1-6, Ed McCaffrey 1-5.
San Diego tackles-assists-sacks: Dennis Gibson 9-2-0, Junior Seau
9-2-1, Darrien Gordon 5-0-0, Chris Mims 5-0-0, David Griggs 3-2-0,
Darren Carrington 4-0-0, Dwayne Harper 3-0-0, Raylee Johnson 2-0-2,
Shawn Lee 2-0-0, Stanley Richard 1-1-0, Willie Clark 1-0-0, Rueben Davis
1-0-0, Leslie Oneal 1-0-0, Sean Vanhorse 1-0-0, Eric Bieniemy 1-0-0,
Eric Castle 1-0-0, Rodney Harrison 1-0-0, Steve Hendrickson 1-0-0, Doug
Miller 1-0-0, Shannon Mitchell 1-0-0, Ronnie Harmon 1-0-0, Alfred Pupunu
1-0-0.
San Francisco tackles-assists-sacks: Tim McDonald 8-1-0, Ken
Norton 5-2-0, Eric Davis 6-0-0, Tyrone Drakeford 4-0-0, Dennis Brown
3-1-0.5, Gary Plummer 2-2-0, Deion Sanders 2-2-0, Bryant Young 3-0-0,
Toi Cook 2-1-0, Ricky Jackson 2-0-0, Dana Stubblefield 2-0-1, Dana Hall
1-1-0, Merton Hanks 1-1-0, Tim Harris 1-1-0.5, Charles Mann 1-0-0, Lee
Woodall 0-1-0, Antonio Goss 1-0-0, Darin Jordan 1-0-0, Derek Loville
1-0-0, Kevin Mitchell 1-0-0, Ralph Tamm 1-0-0, Adam Walker 2-0-0, Troy
Wilson 1-0-0.
Interceptions: San Francisco (Deion Sanders 1 for 15 yards, Toi
Cook 1 for 1 yards, Eric Davis 1 for 0 yards).
Fumbles lost: None.
Opponent's fumbles recovered: None.
Officials: Referee-Jerry Markbreit. Umpire-Ron Botchan. Head
linesman-Don Phares. Line judge-Ron Baynes. Back judge-Tim Millis. Side
judge-Tom Fincken. Field judge-Jack Vaughan.
A: 74,107; No shows: 0; T: 3:36
Copyright � 1995 Starwave Corporation. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.
|
9.3433 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Jan 30 1995 08:54 | 4 |
| After all the predictions lasted week that SD would win this game I
expect to see note 50 get lots of replies today.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3434 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | UMass > UConn | Mon Jan 30 1995 09:14 | 9 |
|
dontcha just hate 2-point conversions????????
;^(
I had Niners 9 Chargers 4 could won 1500 if they'd have kicked their extra
points or San Fran had cared enough to stop one of them.........
mike
|
9.3435 | BLOWN COVERAGE | WMOIS::BUCKLEY_M | | Mon Jan 30 1995 10:30 | 7 |
| I was 2 minutes and 25 seconds away from $5,000!!!! What hurts is
the ABC camera crew was showing Coach Seifert getting the gatorade
bath while San Diego scored there final TD so I didn't even know
they scored until I heard the guy behind me going crazy because
he had that combination!
Oh well it s*cks to be me . . .
|
9.3436 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 30 1995 10:54 | 60 |
| The ABC announcers were really funny last night during that last San Diego
drive when they were talking about how half of America was sitting on the front
of their couches.
Up by 23 points and well within a touchdown of not covering the spread the
49'ers had taken all the stars and 2nd string players out of the game and were
practically playing the cheer leaders on offense. If the Chargers had scored a
touchdown on their final drive, that would have cut the lead to 16 or 17 with
hardly any time left on the clock.
Somehow in the confusing and chaotic scramble the Chargers failed to score.
Everyone will have their favorites but for me the following was the number
one highlight of Super Bowl XXIX with little or no competition.
BUD ...
BUD ...
BUD SER ...
BUD SER ...
BUD ... WEI ...
BUD SER ... ... WEI
BUD SER ... WEI ...
BUD ... ... WEI ... SER
BUD WEI ... SER
BUD WEI SER ...
BUD WEI SER ...
George
|
9.3437 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 30 1995 11:01 | 12 |
| Yes, George, we do agree on that. I loved that Budweiser frog commercial.
I also got a kick out of seeing the two McDonald's guys finally make it
there, with the little Larry/Michael flashback.
Thought the Coke and Pepsi driver commercial was cool too, and that clever
one with the kid sucking himself into the bottle....
Bud Bowl/Island guys was a let down......
'Saw
|
9.3438 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Mon Jan 30 1995 12:11 | 8 |
| RE: .3435
Oh, you had SF 9/SD 8, too...
Glad I wasn't alone.
I also had SF 1/SD 0, with Doug Brien lining up for a FG before halftime.
I was cursing the holder for turning the laces the wrong way...
|
9.3439 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Jan 30 1995 12:24 | 6 |
| I had SF 7 SD 9 in the 1st half and SF 8 SD 9 in the
2nd.
oh well; next year.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3440 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Mon Jan 30 1995 12:31 | 5 |
|
I was wondering how Brien must have felt after the game. He really
wasn't asked to do much, and what he did, he messed up.
brews
|
9.3441 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | | Mon Jan 30 1995 12:56 | 6 |
|
I think the holder helped him mess up somewhat. Laces were the wrong way -
on a long attempt a lot of things have to go perfectly. (Well, more so than
on a short attempt...)
Roland
|
9.3442 | We Saw The Best | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Mon Jan 30 1995 12:57 | 2 |
| Well, I suppose either this 49'er offense or the one that blew
out Denver are the finest offenses the NFL has ever seen.
|
9.3443 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Mon Jan 30 1995 13:01 | 8 |
|
One thing that amazed me was that as good as this offense was, it was
still 100 yards shy of the 'skins record for most yards in a half, and
the 'skins did most of that on the ground. I had forgotten how that
team had chewed up Denver.
brews
|
9.3444 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Jan 30 1995 13:27 | 5 |
|
The 1983 Redskins were also an incredible machine on offense. Don't they still
hold the record for most points in an NFL season (not including playoffs)?
The Crazy Met
|
9.3445 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Mon Jan 30 1995 13:32 | 10 |
| I know that Young was dead-bang-on last night. His reads seemed to be
perfect nearly every time.
He and Rice were almost sharing the same mind, it seemed, and he picked
the SD defense apart.
Unless I'm mistaken, they scored on 4 of their first five drives, yes?
'Saw
|
9.3446 | NFC>AFC again | AWASH::MMARLAND | | Mon Jan 30 1995 16:17 | 15 |
| The post game interview with the 9er's was very classy. I think it was Norton or
Rice who said he was more glad for Ricky Jackson hettting his first ring after
13 years, than getting a 3rd in a row or 4th ring.
Sanders getting popped was a highlight as well, even the announcers seemed to go
for it.
Now the million dollar question why is there such a discrepancy between the
AFC and NFC . They all draft form the same pool, play the same amount of games
and teams. What gives....
|
9.3447 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Jan 30 1995 16:24 | 7 |
| I don't think it's a case of the NFC>>AFC, but rather that there are 2
teams that are far and away more committed to winning than the rest of
the league - including the rest of the NFC.
After Dallas and San Francisco, the talent drops dramatically.
Mark.
|
9.3448 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 30 1995 16:29 | 22 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3446 by AWASH::MMARLAND >>>
>Now the million dollar question why is there such a discrepancy between the
>AFC and NFC . They all draft form the same pool, play the same amount of games
>and teams. What gives....
As someone pointed out earlier there's not really all that much of a
difference between the AFC and the NFC. It's just that the NFC has these two
teams, the 49'ers and the Cowboys, who are better than anyone else.
Take a look at the other 4 teams that made the playoffs from the NFC, they
all got beaten by the Patriots this year.
Also I was keeping track for about 10 weeks and overall the AFC and NFC games
were pretty much even. I think the NFC was only leading by a couple games when
I stopped counting.
As for the 11 year streak, again over half of that is due to those two teams.
And even when the Giants and Skins won I don't think that overall the NFC was
all that much better than the AFC.
George
|
9.3449 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jan 30 1995 16:31 | 5 |
| Whoooooo!!!! Notes collision and Mark and I agree!!!!!
IT MUST BE TRUTH!!!!!!!
George
|
9.3450 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Mon Jan 30 1995 19:06 | 10 |
| It's not just the past 11 years, except for one year by the Raiders, you
gotta go back to the 70's Steeler teams to find the last aFC team to
win the championship. Add that to the interconference winning record,
and it's gotta be more than coincidence.
Kudos should also go to Bobby Ross for his comments after the game.
Barry Switzer shoulda had a notepad and pen, so he can learn what to
say next time, and not blame it on the refs and the field.
brews
|
9.3451 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Mon Jan 30 1995 19:10 | 6 |
| Brews, that is true for the SB; but since 1970 the NFC has won 53% of
the games against the AFC. Not exactly domination. It has been about
that the last 11 years as well.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3452 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Mon Jan 30 1995 19:12 | 7 |
|
It may not be domination, but if you do whatever the test is for
statistical significance, I'll bet that it is significant enough to
prove who is better. And I'll bet it gets a little bit better when
you factor out the great Steeler and Raider teams of the 70's.
brews
|
9.3453 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Jan 31 1995 11:15 | 8 |
| The NFC produces teams that are champions...teams that have the players
and the type of game that obviously dominates in the Super Bowl. Regular
season inter-conference play may be slightly more significant than pre-season
game results.
I heard it said yesterday that during this run of NFC domination, not only
did the NFC produce the best team, but the best two teams, each year (ie:
either NFC Championship game participant would have smoked the AFC rep).
|
9.3454 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Tue Jan 31 1995 11:29 | 12 |
| >>Regular season inter-conference play may be slightly more
>>significant than pre-season game results
Do the words over simplification mean anything to you?
The Pre-season games mean absolutley squat and the regular
season games, be they inter-conference or intra-conference, are
used to determine whether you are playing post season ball or
calling for tee times. I'd call that pretty significant.
billl
|
9.3455 | IMO | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | jan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!! | Tue Jan 31 1995 11:41 | 12 |
|
I disagree with the NFC runnerup smoking the AFC!!!
1984 it woulda been the 16-2 dolphins vs the Bears
85 Pats vs Rams (woulda been close
87 Denver would have gave Minny a game.
88 Niners beat the Bengals 20-16 but they beat the bears 28-3 in the
nfc championship.
Chap
|
9.3456 | thanks | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 31 1995 12:06 | 8 |
| > 87 Denver would have gave Minny a game.
I think we should all give thanks that this never happened.
They'd probably still be playing since neither of them coulda actually
won the thang.
TTom
|
9.3457 | WLAF starts march here | MASALA::DWALLACE | | Tue Jan 31 1995 12:44 | 6 |
| I have a question one of you guys can check for me.
Can you post the scores for all the SF v Miami games from 1988-present
please. Thanx in advance.
Davie.
|
9.3458 | one game | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 31 1995 12:53 | 6 |
| The onlist one I could find in my semi-respectable stats is that San
Francisco beat Miami 27-3 in game 14 of the 92 season.
FWIW, the line was 8.
TTom
|
9.3459 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 31 1995 12:54 | 24 |
| Yes the NFC is producing champions but it's not because of anything to do
with them being in the National Conference. It's nothing more than coincidence
that the best teams in the last decade all happen to be in the NFC just as it
was coincidence that the best teams in the '70s were in the AFC.
It's not like the American and National leagues in baseball where there are
different rules and different umpires, the Conferences in the NFL are just
arbitrary groupings of teams and by coincidence the good teams fell in one group
during the 70's and the other group ever since.
I guess the question is, should anything be done to help make the superbowl
more competitive. One suggestion that seems to be going around is to seed the
12 (or however many) teams that make the playoffs without regard to conferences
or divisions. Had that happened this time around, S.F. and Dallas would not
have met before the superbowl since they would have been the #1 and #2 seeds.
Considering how little the Conferences mean, maybe that's not a bad idea. Or
another idea would be to keep the 6 divisions and do away with the Conferences.
They could seed the division winners giving the top 4 of 6 bys for the 1st
round with the 1 and 4 seed on one side and the 2 and 3 seed on the other.
Then they could pick 6 wildcards from the league rather than 3 from each
conference.
George
|
9.3460 | point is?????? | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Tue Jan 31 1995 12:54 | 5 |
| Ok class, today's word is 'rhetorical'.
billl
|
9.3461 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:02 | 12 |
| Re <<< Note 9.3460 by MKFSA::LONG "Close, but no cigar!" >>>
> -< point is?????? >-
>
> Ok class, today's word is 'rhetorical'.
You talk'en to me?
This is just the NFC/AFC debate and a suggestion I heard for seeding the
playoffs, have I said something out of line?
George
|
9.3462 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:28 | 6 |
| >>You talk'en to me?
Nope. Was a little slow responding to .3457.
billl
|
9.3463 | how long should we wait for the current cycle to pass ? | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:48 | 4 |
| Eliminating Conferences, and seeding playoff teams would avoid 'cyclical'
conference domination which has led to boring NFL fans to tears on what
should be the ULTIMATE showdown in the biggest single game in American
sports.
|
9.3464 | a real long cycle | HBAHBA::HAAS | dingle lingo | Tue Jan 31 1995 13:54 | 3 |
| How long did the American League go without winning a_All-Star game?
TTom
|
9.3465 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Tue Jan 31 1995 14:01 | 16 |
| <<< Note 9.3459 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
> ... It's nothing more than coincidencethat the best teams in the last
> decade all happen to be in the NFC just as itwas coincidence that the
> best teams in the '70s were in the AFC
If it was 3-4 years, or maybe even 5-6 years I could see your point.
But it's been 11 years, and most of the games were a blowout of huge
proportions. Add to that the edge that the NFC has in interconference
play over that same time frame, and it's not a coincidence. As someone
(Joe?) said earlier, almost always the 2nd best NFC team was better
than what the AFC has had to offer as its champ. It's just been too
long to say that it was coincidence.
brews
|
9.3466 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | SaveThePatriots | Tue Jan 31 1995 14:12 | 7 |
| Take away the "old" NFL teams that went over to the AFC and
the AFC (old AFL) has won 7 Super Bowls since the first one.
Raiders (3), Miami (2), New York (1) and Kansas City (1). Good
thing the merger brought NFL teams into the AFC or we would be talking
total domination.
/Don
|
9.3467 | SB label is for show anyway...for games what would seeding add? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 31 1995 14:46 | 30 |
|
> Eliminating Conferences, and seeding playoff teams would avoid 'cyclical'
> conference domination which has led to boring NFL fans to tears on what
> should be the ULTIMATE showdown in the biggest single game in American
> sports.
Substitute the words "NFC Championship" for "Super Bowl" and you still
get the same game. As a fan, I don't mind seeing that game played one
round earlier under conditions where much of the commercialism and
hype have been removed, better yet on somebody's home field with real
home fans rather than in front of sterilized NFL-approved socialites
and The World's Tackiest Halftime Performers. The big losers are the
advertisers and the once-a-year Super Bowl party-goers, and if we're
going to get one inferior game either way, I almost take some perverse
pleasure in seeing these types pull their hair out after laying out the
thousands of dollars and thinking that in any way they're getting the
best of the great show that has been going on for the 20 weeks leading
up to the Bowl.
Besides, as long as the NFL plays imbalanced divisional and conference
schedules that hide conference differentials, there's no guarantee that
the seeding system will make things any better. This year the #2 seed
might have been Pittsburgh. It'd be interesting to see what seeding by
record would have produced over the past 10 years and whether it'd have
"worked". Plus, aesthetically I think that throwing out the conference
affiliations in the playoffs would give them that contrived NHL/NBA
free-for-all feel...
glenn
|
9.3468 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Jan 31 1995 14:51 | 4 |
| There was at least 1 year where Buffalo would have gotten the #2 seed
but the NFC loser, SF, was better than them.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3469 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:22 | 26 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3465 by ONOFRE::MAY_BR "pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys" >>>
> If it was 3-4 years, or maybe even 5-6 years I could see your point.
> But it's been 11 years, and most of the games were a blowout of huge
> proportions.
No, it makes sense. It may sound less of a coincidence when you talk about 11
games but you are looking at the wrong number. Look at the number of teams that
we are talking about here.
There are two teams, the Cowboys and the 49'ers, that have become the two
dominant teams in the last 7-8 years who have accounted for most of the wins.
If you calculate the probability that if two teams emerge as super teams that
they will both be from the same conference I believe you will find that it is
50-50 (1 in 4 for the AFC, 1 in 4 for the NFC, 2 in 4 one of each). Even
throwing in the Redskins, the chances are still 1 in 4 that 3 super teams will
all be from the same conference.
As for the Giants, they played a really close game against the Bills so I'm
not sure they count.
And that's it, no other NFC team has been able to crack that group. So a 1 in
4 chance of 3 dominant teams being from the NFC is a bit of a long shot but not
that much.
George
|
9.3470 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Mike Lupica - Literary Giant! | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:34 | 14 |
|
>> There are two teams, the Cowboys and the 49'ers, that have become
>> the two dominant teams in the last 7-8 years who have accounted for
>> most of the wins.
Not really. The 'Boys have only won two in the stretch that you're
talking about. So haven't the Skins and the Giants who pretty much
personnified "NFC football". The other NFC team to have won it was
that incredibly dominant Bears team another stereotypical NFC team.
Saying that SF and Dallas 'have accounted for most of the wins" is
correct on the surface but you could have said SF and the Giants or
SF and the Redskins and still have been right. NFC dominance goes
deeper than just SF and Dallas.
|
9.3471 | Jones fe has shown sb#3 wasn't worth the money for him | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:44 | 11 |
| Right the dominance as a league (nfc) was greater several years ago
than now. Free agency hit Dallas but strangely helped SanFran who took
an agressive approach.
The time to do the seeding plan was after the Patriots debacle(speaking
of which this was the beginning of a long line of afc reps who probably
weren't the most competive representative). I'd guess that competition
in the finale will begin again.
Another cometition problem is in how much beyond the "glory" a
superbowl is worth $$$ wise.
|
9.3472 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | UMass > UConn | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:47 | 16 |
|
you tell em' Tommy.
Joe, I think the biggest game of the year is the basketball championship
game of the NCAA. Seems alot of people agree with me and for sure the
games are never boring. Only blowout in recent memory is UNLV pasting
of Duke...........
Unless my team is in it I have no interest in the Superbowl other than my
pool numbers. For interest sunday could have been Denver vs. Minny and had
no more interest to me than the matchup that was. The NCAA on the other
hand is interesting and I can always get behind one of the teams and the
fans are into reguardless of who the teams are.......
mike
|
9.3473 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:57 | 22 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3470 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Mike Lupica - Literary Giant!" >>>
> Saying that SF and Dallas 'have accounted for most of the wins" is
> correct on the surface but you could have said SF and the Giants or
> SF and the Redskins and still have been right. NFC dominance goes
> deeper than just SF and Dallas.
So fine Tommy, you caught me on yet another nit picking detail that doesn't
amount to a piss hole in the snow.
Even if you have 4 teams taking turns at being a super team there is still a
1 in 8 chance of them all coming from the same conference. And I don't buy
the Giants as a super team, just as a good team who did well so that brings
us back to 1 in 4.
That's well within the limits of this being a coincidence rather than
something fundamentally different about teams being in the NFC.
But I'm always open to different ideas. If there is something about the NFC
that makes it more likely to produce super teams, let's hear it?
George
|
9.3474 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Tue Jan 31 1995 15:58 | 24 |
| Well, I'll probably piss everyone off, but I kind of like it the way
it is.
Football is the only sport left, seemingly, where the doctors have pulled
out their scalpels and sterilized things into parity. Four or five years
ago, the "dominant" division, with some of the best competition seemed to
be the NFC East, with the Giants, Washington, Philly, and Dallas, all
playing hardnosed, kickass football.
That seems to have shifted away now, as coaches have changed jobs, personnel
has rotated, and philosophies have changed.
One of the brightest hopes for the AFC is the combination of Parcells
in New England, and Bethard in SD. They both espouse that NFC East
brand of football.
Sure, San Diego sucked in this years Super Bowl, but I don't think it will
be all that long again before the AFC wins another.
Also, don't forget, it's a one game championship game. I did some checking
and of all the Super Bowls, only 5 were determined by 7 points or less....
'Saw
|
9.3475 | 11 in a row a coincidence? | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Mike Lupica - Literary Giant! | Tue Jan 31 1995 16:09 | 21 |
|
>> So fine Tommy, you caught me on yet another nit picking detail that
>> doesn't amount to a piss hole in the snow.
These nitpicking details that you constantly refer to, George, are
in reality errors in fact. I'd expect that George Maiewski, amateur
solicitor, would be a little tighter with his facts than you often
are. You're original statement was correct but misleading.
>> Even if you have 4 teams taking turns at being a super team there is
>> still a 1 in 8 chance of them all coming from the same conference. And
>> I don't buy the Giants as a super team, just as a good team who did well
They did well alright. They won the SB twice in the timespan being dis-
cussed which is exactly how many Dallas won yet you choose to classify
one as a 'super team' and not the other.
>> But I'm always open to different ideas.
No you're not. This will go round and round and not get anywhere.
|
9.3476 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Mike Lupica - Literary Giant! | Tue Jan 31 1995 16:38 | 18 |
|
>> Football is the only sport left, seemingly, where the doctors have
>> pulled out their scalpels and sterilized things into parity. Four
>> or five years ago, the "dominant" division...
>> That seems to have shifted away now, as coaches have changed jobs,
>> personnel has rotated, and philosophies have changed.
I don't think that's as a result of attempts to bring about parity.
Really it's a result of free agency and guys like Parcells and
Bethard moving on to new challenges and more bucks. Certainly, there
was no league mandate for them to move and bring up New England
and SD from the dregs. Even with the new free agency and cap rules,
it's the best run franchises that thrive. The attempts at parity
really succeed in creating mediocrity to the point where you have
four teams from the NFC Central in the playoffs and none of them
good enough to get to the NFC title game.
|
9.3477 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 01 1995 09:07 | 26 |
| >
> I don't think that's as a result of attempts to bring about parity.
> Really it's a result of free agency and guys like Parcells and
> Bethard moving on to new challenges and more bucks. Certainly, there
> was no league mandate for them to move and bring up New England
> and SD from the dregs. Even with the new free agency and cap rules,
> it's the best run franchises that thrive. The attempts at parity
> really succeed in creating mediocrity to the point where you have
> four teams from the NFC Central in the playoffs and none of them
> good enough to get to the NFC title game.
>
Right. I didn't mean to convey the idea that Parcells and Bethard moved
out of a parity plan.
While it's true that four of the NFC Central teams made it to the dance
while being fairly mediocre, I'd think in the ideal parity situation
(which might be great for teams' bank accounts but sucks for fans) that
you wouldn't have two such dominant teams as Dallas and San Fran.
So, the NFL (thank Gawd) hasn't achieved total parity yet....I think.
'Saw
|
9.3478 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Feb 01 1995 09:10 | 27 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3475 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Mike Lupica - Literary Giant!" >>>
> These nitpicking details that you constantly refer to, George, are
> in reality errors in fact. I'd expect that George Maiewski, amateur
> solicitor, would be a little tighter with his facts than you often
> are. You're original statement was correct but misleading.
No it was not misleading. My point is that from a statistical point of view
we should look at the number of winning teams, not the number of victories and
adding one more team didn't change things all that much. It's like making a
spelling error, yes it's an error but the point remains the same.
> They [the Giants] alright. They won the SB twice in the timespan being dis-
> cussed which is exactly how many Dallas won yet you choose to classify
> one as a 'super team' and not the other.
So fine, they did alright. We have no argument there. But in my opinion they
didn't dominate teams the way Dallas did. Even still, within the guidelines of
this discussion having 4 teams rather than 3 doesn't make that much difference.
> No you're not. This will go round and round and not get anywhere.
Look who's talk'en. Just yesterday I admitted I was wrong about the Celtics
because I didn't realize how the salary cap worked. When was the last time that
you admitted making a mistake in a SPORTS debate?
George
|
9.3479 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Feb 01 1995 09:57 | 9 |
| > Look who's talk'en. Just yesterday I admitted I was wrong about the Celtics
>because I didn't realize how the salary cap worked. When was the last time that
>you admitted making a mistake in a SPORTS debate?
How about Tuesday? (hint: see his p-name)
Mark.
|
9.3480 | w | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:36 | 51 |
| >
> So fine, they did alright. We have no argument there. But in my opinion they
>didn't dominate teams the way Dallas did. Even still, within the guidelines of
>this discussion having 4 teams rather than 3 doesn't make that much difference.
>
Well, dominate is relative.
In 1986, the Giants went 14-2 in the regular season. They lost to Dallas
in a close one in Game 1. They lost one that they SHOULD have won in Seattle
in Game 5. The season's turning point, IMO, was on the 4 and 14 (or so)
in Minnesota. They went for it, Simms hitting one of the wideouts on the
sideline, and won the game.
In the playoffs that year, they beat San Francisco 49-3, then, in a wind
blown game in the Meadowlands, chose to kick off to Washington, to get the
wind, and they beat the Jay Schroeder led Redskins 17-0. So, heading into
the Super Bowl, they were beating their opponents 66-3.
In the Super Bowl, they were losing 10-9 at the half, but beat the Broncos
like a rented mule, 39-20. The score was closer than it seemed, because
the Broncos got a late TD.
I guess our definition of domination is different, because to me, the 1986
Giants pretty much dominated things right up till the time they accepted
the Lombardi Trophy.
In 1990, the Giants got off to a 10-0 start, then promptly lost four games
in a row. They won their last two, for a 12-4 finish, winning the NFC East.
They played Chicago in the Meadowlands, and beat them 31-3. Then they
travelled to San Francisco, and the two teams slugged it out. The Giants
didn't score a TD, but beat San Francisco 15-13 on the leg of Matt Bahr.
We all know they then played in the closest Super Bowl ever, beating
Buffalo 20-19.
Did they dominate like Dallas? Looking purely at the football aspects, I'd
say yes, they did. They don't get the press that Dallas gets, which is
surprising since New York is *THE* media center in the US, I'd say.
Granted, I'm a Jints fan, but I think the record speaks for itself....
'Sa
|
9.3481 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | UMass > UConn | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:41 | 14 |
|
>Did they dominate like Dallas? Looking purely at the football aspects, I'd
>say yes, they did. They don't get the press that Dallas gets, which is
>surprising since New York is *THE* media center in the US, I'd say.
that's cause they don't have JJ and JJ owning and coaching them and promoting
their supposed greatness. Or have mouths like Michael, Emitt and BoyToy.....
mike
|
9.3482 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:51 | 22 |
| > that's cause they don't have JJ and JJ owning and coaching them and promoting
> their supposed greatness. Or have mouths like Michael, Emitt and BoyToy.....
That's true.
I think part of that was due to Parcells. I remember footage of him yelling
at the lineman late in a game, (late in the season or playoffs) for celebrating
early. He hated that.
Another example is the story I love of Phil Simms taking a cab ride to the
Super Bowl, with a couple of the offensive lineman. I think it was
Bart Oates (or maybe Brad Benson) who said later that Phil told them in the
cab that he felt like he was going to have a good game that day. He had the
3rd best passing day in the history of the NFL.
I can't help but feel that some of the players in the 90s would have been
shouting that to any member of the press who'd listen.....
'Saw
|
9.3483 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Mike Lupica - Literary Giant! | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:57 | 31 |
| >> My point is that from a statistical point of view we should look
>> at the number of winning teams, not the number of victories and
>> adding one more team didn't change things all that much.
"From a statistical point of view" five different NFC teams have
won the SB in the last 11 years and zero AFC teams have. In those 11
years, it could be argued that in at least 7 the second best team
was also from the NFC. You're argument seems to be that you can't
statistically prove NFC domination because X team from the NFC didn't
win the SB then immediately fade out of sight so that Y team from the
NFC could step to the fore and win it and in the course of 11 years
11 different teams would have won it.
>> So fine, they did alright. We have no argument there. But in my opinion
>> they didn't dominate teams the way Dallas did.
In 1986 the Giants lost two games all season and won the SB by 32 points.
If that ain't dominating then what is?
>> Even still, within the guidelines of this discussion having 4 teams
>> rather than 3 doesn't make that much difference.
It's 5 teams not 4 or 3.
>> Look who's talk'en. Just yesterday I admitted I was wrong about the
>> Celtics because I didn't realize how the salary cap worked.
It's "talkin'" not "talk'en".
|
9.3484 | dominating Giants ! | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Feb 01 1995 10:58 | 1 |
| what they said....
|
9.3485 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Feb 01 1995 11:07 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3483 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Mike Lupica - Literary Giant!" >>>
Hey Tommy, I got some sun flower seeds in my office, how about munching a
few.
You want 5 teams? Ok fine, given no advantage at all there is a 1 in 16
chance that 5 dominate teams will come from the same division. Still within
the range of possibility
Don't like that, fine. Now it's your turn. If it's not coincidence that the
NFC has won 11 in a row then what is it? Rules that favor good teams? No, the
NFC uses the same rules. Officials? No, same organization controls the
officials. I give up, what?
George
|
9.3486 | More like 8 or 9 "teams", at 1 in 100 or more... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 01 1995 12:00 | 48 |
|
> You want 5 teams? Ok fine, given no advantage at all there is a 1 in 16
> chance that 5 dominate teams will come from the same division. Still within
> the range of possibility
It's 1 in 16 but the number only gets larger when you consider that
three of those teams (San Fran, New York, and Washington) reloaded and
won again years apart with significantly changed teams. In San Fran's
case they won it all four or more years apart with _three_ very
different squads (as did Washington if you consider their SB win that
came before the single AFC win over the last 14 seasons, plus add
another for San Fran under the same criteria). Your position that this
could be due to "random chance" is simply not tenable, George. The
imbalance is due to stability and commitment by the front offices of
this handful of franchises that was not matched by any franchise in
the AFC and more pertinent to the argument has _still_ not been
matched. Of the big four (San Fran, Dallas, New York, and Washington)
I would say that only Washington may have dropped out for good (for a
long while) because they've lost both Gibbs and Beathard, and because
more so than the others they did win somewhat in spite of a
psychopathic owner.
From Mike C:
> that's cause they don't have JJ and JJ owning and coaching them and promoting
> their supposed greatness. Or have mouths like Michael, Emitt and BoyToy.....
Since when have Emmitt and Troy had excessively big mouths? Neither
of these two could ever hope to match Lawrence Taylor's in a jawing
session. I've always hated the Cowboys and that hasn't changed because
of the JJs but the bashing of these two players has become tiresome.
Fact is, forget even about talent and publicity, like LT each of these
guys may be the _toughest_ (that quality we love in football players,
even if they happen to be Giants) in the NFL at his position and, as
opposed to LT, both are consummate professionals far as I can see.
By any objective standard the Cowboys are/were more dominant than the
Giants starting with the fact that they may not be done yet. Even if
they are, they truly dominated the past two years. The Giants did not
dominate for more than one year, and even though I was rooting for
them, the 1990 Giants definitely were not dominant and more precisely
were the luckiest and therefore least dominant champions over the
history of the Super Bowl years (not a slur; "lucky" defined as "closest
to elimination only to pull it out in improbable fashion"-- see NFC
Championship Game, not to mention the Super Bowl itself).
glenn
|
9.3487 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 01 1995 12:13 | 26 |
| > history of the Super Bowl years (not a slur; "lucky" defined as "closest
> to elimination only to pull it out in improbable fashion"-- see NFC
> Championship Game, not to mention the Super Bowl itself).
I don't think LUCK and improbability had anything to do with it.
In the NFC Championship game, they did what they needed to do to win
it -- force a turnover and move the ball into field goal range.
In the Super Bowl, they did what they needed to do to win -- stop Thurmon
Thomas short enough to force a FG that was beyond their range.
If the Giants don't stop Thurmon Thomas and he gains two more yards,
then what's-his-face makes that FG. They did stop him, and the rest is
history.
Actually, to ME, THE play in that Super Bowl was the Giants wideout
"rumblin and stumblin, and ramblin and scramblin" on the 4th down play
to get the first down.
Did the Giants dominate over several years, as in repeat? No. But they
were always in the hunt.
'Saw
|
9.3488 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | UMass > UConn | Wed Feb 01 1995 12:21 | 14 |
|
Ok Glenn maybe not mouths but ego-manics and self promoting bums comes to
mind. Every time I turn around I see one of them in some commercial.
Emitt's playing at the detriment to the team when he's hurt to chase some
records. BoyToy shuts out Irvin earlier in the year cause Irvin had the
gonads to questions his decision making.
I'll conceed that Emitt might be the toughest at his posistion but the
Boytoy? Get Real! Let's talk Billy Joe Tolliver or some other poor slob
that isn't afforded the protection that Troy has. Stan Humphries is also
another fine canidate for the toughest....
mike
|
9.3489 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 01 1995 12:28 | 33 |
|
>> history of the Super Bowl years (not a slur; "lucky" defined as "closest
>> to elimination only to pull it out in improbable fashion"-- see NFC
>> Championship Game, not to mention the Super Bowl itself).
>
> I don't think LUCK and improbability had anything to do with it.
>
> In the NFC Championship game, they did what they needed to do to win
> it -- force a turnover and move the ball into field goal range.
I think if you're completely objective about it, you'd agree that there
was a whole lot of "luck" in that "force a turnover" part, when the
opponent did so while in the process of running out the clock when the
turnover was absolutely the only thing that could beat them at that
point. I still have no real explanation for it nor I suspect does
Roger Craig. This is as much luck as you're ever going to see at the
end of such a championship football game short of a ball bouncing off
someone's head in crazy and unexpected fashion (see the Immaculate
Reception). Nothing wrong with it; it is occasionally a very big part
of the game, in this case a huge part.
But the main point is that I do not consider the 1990-vintage Giants
a dominant team, but I'd agree with you based on excellence over a
number of years they had a dominant organization. I wouldn't make
this latter distinction based entirely on Super Bowl wins or even
appearances because you have to consider the competition. No question
that the Giants organization was stronger than any from the AFC
including teams like Denver and Buffalo that made it that far more
times.
glenn
|
9.3490 | Give the guy his due for once-- he is Oklahoma-boy TOUGH | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 01 1995 12:32 | 13 |
|
> I'll conceed that Emitt might be the toughest at his posistion but the
> Boytoy? Get Real!
Absolutely and I've heard the same assessment from more than one
analyst. I'm not talking about just being able to come back from
severe beatings for coming back's sake, but to do so _and_ perform
at a high level. The NFC Championship Game was a perfect example.
It's high pain tolerance and focus and concentration, not just high
pain tolerance.
glenn
|
9.3491 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Feb 01 1995 12:36 | 24 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3486 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>
>Your position that this
> could be due to "random chance" is simply not tenable, George. The
> imbalance is due to stability and commitment by the front offices of
> this handful of franchises that was not matched by any franchise in
> the AFC and more pertinent to the argument has _still_ not been
> matched.
Actually this supports my argument, not the one I'm arguing against.
The position that I am arguing against it that there is something about the
being in the NFC that makes teams more likely to win. My argument is that it is
coincidence that teams capable of winning are in the NFC and that the fact that
they are in the NFC has nothing to do their success.
I agree with your point that the reason these teams keep coming back to win
has to do with their superior front office but again the fact that those front
offices all ended up in the NFC is coincidence.
But I'm still waiting for someone to come up with something about the NFC
which would favor their teams over teams unlucky enough to be in the AFC.
George
|
9.3492 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:20 | 57 |
| > I think if you're completely objective about it, you'd agree that there
> was a whole lot of "luck" in that "force a turnover" part, when the
> opponent did so while in the process of running out the clock when the
> turnover was absolutely the only thing that could beat them at that
> point. I still have no real explanation for it nor I suspect does
> Roger Craig. This is as much luck as you're ever going to see at the
> end of such a championship football game short of a ball bouncing off
> someone's head in crazy and unexpected fashion (see the Immaculate
> Reception). Nothing wrong with it; it is occasionally a very big part
> of the game, in this case a huge part.
I don't have a highlight tape from 1990, so memory may be hazy here, but
didn't Craig take a helluva hit from LT?
I don't know about you, but I think I'd experience a week of barium
enemas WHILE getting my teeth scraped than take a hit from LT.
And they weren't necessarily "running out the clock", not in what I'd
term running out the clock. They still had to make yards and move the
ball. I don't believe they were in a situation where they could afford
to punt and give the Giants back the ball. I could be wrong.
Again, wish I had that highlight tape.
> But the main point is that I do not consider the 1990-vintage Giants
> a dominant team, but I'd agree with you based on excellence over a
> number of years they had a dominant organization. I wouldn't make
> this latter distinction based entirely on Super Bowl wins or even
> appearances because you have to consider the competition. No question
> that the Giants organization was stronger than any from the AFC
> including teams like Denver and Buffalo that made it that far more
> times.
I'd agree on the 1990 team. They started out great. 10-0 is nothing to
sneeze at.
I saw the 1990 team as a team in a rebuilding stage. NOT the kind of
rebuilding after everyone leaves, but a team that was VERY good, but building
towards a team that could be GREAT. They needed a litte more of this, and a
little more of that etc, but they weren't there yet.
Where they could have gone, had Parcells stayed is anyone's guess. But
we know what did happen -- the won the Bowl, Parcells left on top, and
whatever good was left behind was destroyed by the Giants version of
Bob Palmer, Ray Handley.....
One thing I DO remember from the playoffs following the 1986 season was
the Niners passing to Jerry Rice on the opening drive, Rice splitting the
safeties much as he did last Sunday, and while running in the open field,
FUMBLING the ball, and the Giants recovered. NEVER thought I'd see that!
'Saw
|
9.3493 | Follow the buck | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:34 | 16 |
| I think George is saying why is this (eerie success) only happening to
nfc clubs. I've noticed one factor in the five clubs involved and that
is our old friend mr. bucks.
Dallas,N.Y,Chicago and Washington are perennial sell-outs, win or lose
and are able to carry over profits. Some of their competition like
Buffalo,New England and Oakland/LA have to be much more budget
conscious.
Looking at N.E. we can certainly see where a tight-fisted organization
sacfificed top tier status (attainable by resigning Haynes,Gray...)to
retain a mere competitive status (not to speak of the Fairbanks saga).
Sometimes the spending can be in the form of secondary things like
quality of assistant coaches, specialists and special equipment,
charter vs commercial air.
|
9.3494 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:36 | 4 |
9.3495 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:37 | 4 |
|
The sellout arguement doesn't hold for Denver...
Claybone
|
9.3496 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:43 | 16 |
| >has to do with their superior front office but again the fact that those front
>offices all ended up in the NFC is coincidence.
Coincidence ? These franchises weren't put in the NFC through some lottery.
The NFC has the original NFL franchises. I think solid organizations are
grounded in historical foundation, which leads to a clear understanding
of expectations. Three of the 4 (Dallas, the Giants, Wash) all have rich,
winning traditions which I believe drive all of the organization's decisions.
Any other NFC team has a very high standard to meet just to get out of the
NFC and get to the SB. Debartolo has met the standard (after falling into
a championship run, courtesy of Walsh and Montana). Chicago resurrected its
past glory, but the cast of characters (Ditka, Buddy, McMahon) were too
volatile to remain together. GB is TRYING to get up there too.
The last 5-6 years the AFC's standard has been set by Buffalo. And that
level of achievement has proven to be too low.
|
9.3497 | besides I hated Denver while most of you were in grammar school | AKOCOA::BREEN | That is enough for me and for thee | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:47 | 10 |
| I agree Denver is unique. For an excuse there I would offer their
unique home-field advantage which may have helped them get furthur than
their talent warranted.
Cleveland, yes, has all the arguments of Dallas, N.Y - they were inches
from the superbowl and I thought at the time would have been a much
better candidate. But, they didn't do it.
Again when we talk the money we come into the Kraft thing where success
= $loss or does it.
|
9.3498 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:47 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3496 by USCTR1::GARBARINO >>>
>Coincidence ? These franchises weren't put in the NFC through some lottery.
>The NFC has the original NFL franchises. I think solid organizations are
>grounded in historical foundation, which leads to a clear understanding
>of expectations.
Fine sound good. In fact that was the original reason for why the Suprebowl
would fail. That upstart AFL had no chance against the mighty teams from the
NFL.
But that doesn't account for one minor detail. How do you explain the '70s
when the AFC dominated the superbowl. Not a streak but starting with Superbowl
III and going thorough the 70's they seem to have won more often than not.
It's coincidence that has placed good management in the NFC and that is the
reason for the NFC streak.
George
|
9.3499 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | jan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!! | Wed Feb 01 1995 13:59 | 12 |
|
Another reason for The NFC's dominance in the past decade has
got to be AL Davis's Scenility. The man has lost it and he doesn't
realize it.
With the talent that has gone in and out of LA in the past 7 or
so years, and with him running things behind puppett coaches!!!
The man needs to go out to pasture!
|
9.3500 | You're not alone | AKOCOA::BREEN | That is enough for me and for thee | Wed Feb 01 1995 14:14 | 4 |
| Some say the same about Red with the Celtics. Though in the Raiders
case there's never any doubt about who's making final decisions whereas
here it appears Red keeps quiet and then all of a sudden makes a
decision which is final and perhaps undiscussed prior.
|
9.3501 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Wed Feb 01 1995 14:22 | 19 |
| The Steelers have also sold out since the early '70s and have
had some very lean years in the past 25. So much for the
"constant sellout" theory.
The Steelers were also one of the original NFL teams that
were put in the AFC when it originated. So not all current
AFC teams are from the AFL.
I just have trouble following the Hal-logic that says since
a NFC team has won the last 11 Super Bowls, then the NFC as
a whole is a stronger conference than the AFC. That's as silly
as saying that during the 70's when the AFC team dominated the
Big Dance, the AFC, as a conference, was better than the NFC.
Sorry, it just don't wash with me.
billl
|
9.3502 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 01 1995 14:25 | 17 |
| >Coincidence ? These franchises weren't put in the NFC through some lottery.
>The NFC has the original NFL franchises. I think solid organizations are
>grounded in historical foundation, which leads to a clear understanding
>of expectations. Three of the 4 (Dallas, the Giants, Wash) all have rich,
>winning traditions which I believe drive all of the organization's decisions.
There's got to be something to this. If you look at some of the teams
in the NFC who came in via expansion, they've never really amounted to
much: Tampa Bay (originally AFC for one year, then switched with Seattle),
Atlanta, New Orleans.
Minnesota was an expansion team, but they have done well, and of course
Dallas, but they had an exceptional coach in Tom Landry.
'Saw
|
9.3503 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Feb 01 1995 14:55 | 7 |
| > But that doesn't account for one minor detail. How do you explain the '70s
>when the AFC dominated the superbowl.
Baltimore and Pittsburgh (both original NFL teams with either or both a
winning history or solid -Rooney- organization) accounted for 5 SB
championships during the stretch you're talking about. Whenever Terry
Bradshaw talks about the Steelers' dynasty, he ALWAYS mentions Mr. Rooney.
|
9.3504 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 01 1995 15:27 | 45 |
| I got really curious, based on the discussion of blowouts in the Super Bowl,
so I decided to check and see how many of the NFL Championship Games
were decided by 7 points or less.
Here's what I came up with:
1933 Chicago Bears 23 NY Giants 21 +2
1937 Washington Redskins 28 Chicago Bears 21 +7
1938 NY Giants 23 Green Bay 17 +6
1944 Green Bay 14 New York 7 +7
1945 Cleveland Rams 15 Washington 14 +1
1947 Chicago Cardinals 28 Philadelphia 21 +7
1948 Philadelphia 7 Chicago Cards 0 +7
1950 Cleveland Browns 30 LA Rams 28 +2
1951 LA Rams 24 Cleveland 17 +7
1953 Detroit 17 Cleveland 16 +1
1958 Baltimore 23 NY Giants 17 (OT) +6
1960 Philadelphia 17 Green Bay 13 +4
1963 Chicago 14 NY Giants 10 +4
1966 Green Bay 34 Dallas 27 +7
1967 Green Bay 21 Dallas 17 +4
1969 Minnesota 23 LA Rams 20 +3
16 out of 37 "close" games....
There were also some bigger blowouts than any we've seen in the Super Bowl
1940 Chicago Bears 83 Washington 0 +73
1954 Cleveland 56 Detroit 10 +46
1956 NY Giants 47 Chicago 7 +40
1957 Detroit 59 Cleveland 14 +45
1961 Green Bay 37 New York 0 +37
No one in a Super Bowl has ever been shutout, but in the history of the
NFL Championship game, there were 6 shutouts.....
Just more grist for the mill....
'Saw
|
9.3505 | May have to drag out the old SI tonight... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 01 1995 16:57 | 25 |
|
> I don't have a highlight tape from 1990, so memory may be hazy here, but
> didn't Craig take a helluva hit from LT?
Not to belabor this trivial point but for historical purposes, as I
remember it there was nothing very spectacular about the hit. It
was a good hard tackle in heavy traffic inside the line of scrimmage,
perhaps, but nothing devastating, and the fumble was a combination of
Craig getting a little careless and LT finding the right spot. San
Fran was definitely running out the clock as this occurred near
midfield with ~2 minutes to play (pretty sure that one or at most two
more first downs and it was automatic kneeldown time), and the Giants
only had to move the ball 20-25 yards before Matt Bahr made the
winning FG on the _very last play_ of the game. No fumble and just a
clean punt and it would have taken a minor miracle, 40 more yards of
field position in a minute or so with no timeouts to set up a long
field goal. Not impossible but I still think that this is the closest
that an eventual SB champion has ever come to elimination before
averting it (not that this matters to anyone outside of San Fran; in
fact it probably only makes it all the sweeter to Giants' fans-- it's
still astonishing that a team could win a conference championship game
without scoring a TD).
glenn
|
9.3506 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Feb 01 1995 18:56 | 4 |
| Wasn't SF going for a threepeat in 1990??
The Crazy Met
|
9.3507 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | UMass > UConn | Thu Feb 02 1995 09:52 | 17 |
|
>> Wasn't SF going for a threepeat in 1990??
that's what they thought...hahahaaaa
Giants we're definately lucky here but they do deserve credit for
forcing the fumble. For making the play they absolutely had to make.
I think you can make a good case for just how dominant they were in
the fact that Simms went down, Hoss took over and they still won it
all. Certainly don't think SF could have won without Young this year
or Joe in the past. Dallas without the Boytoy? Maybe cause of Emitt
but post-season has been Troy's time to shine so probably not. Skins
won with Rypien and Williams so they probably could have won with
anybody.........
;^)
|
9.3508 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Feb 02 1995 10:01 | 10 |
| > I think you can make a good case for just how dominant they were in
> the fact that Simms went down, Hoss took over and they still won it
> all. Certainly don't think SF could have won without Young this year
> or Joe in the past.
SF's offensive style depends on the QB more than any other. The Giants
play on offense truly depends on all 11 guys to be successful. Any one
player goes down, they aren't killed by it. Jumbo missed most of last
year and they still had a great year. Hampton was out for 3 or 4 games
this year, and I believe that was during their 5-0 start.
|
9.3509 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | UMass > UConn | Thu Feb 02 1995 10:04 | 5 |
|
actually Joe the Giants started out 3-0 this year dropped their next 7
and won their last 6. Hampton was out mostly during the loosing streak.
mike
|
9.3510 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Mike Lupica - Literary Giant! | Thu Feb 02 1995 10:14 | 12 |
|
>> SF's offensive style depends on the QB more than any other.
The multiple weapons that SF has and the quick short rhythm
passes that they throw make it easy for just about any QB to
thrive. That's why Young, who was shipped from Tampa Bay when the
Bucs drafted Testaverde, could step in and thrive in SF and Bono,
who hasn't done anything since, could look like the second coming
of Joe Willie. Similarly although he's a very good QB in his
own right Troy has benefitted from being situated behind the
best offensive line in the league, in front of two of the best
backs and between two of the best receivers.
|
9.3511 | The details... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 02 1995 11:13 | 24 |
|
Just for the record... in the 1990 NFC Championship Erik Howard forced
the fumble, not LT (LT recovered as the ball popped up right at him).
The Giants took over at their own 43 with 2:35 remaining. Before the
fumble it was looking grim for the Giants, real grim. The Giants had
kicked a FG with about 5 minutes left but the get-3-and-hold-'em
strategy looked dead as the 49ers had already picked up a few first
downs and were looking at running even another play which at worst
would have resulted in another good minute gone before the punt (the
fumble stopped the clock on the change of possession two plays
prematurely). This is all pretty consistent with my recollection of an
absolutely devastating and really inexcusable mistake on Craig's part
and I'll bet that if Giants' fans scan the brain cells real hard
they'll remember that they had to have been thinking "well it's been
a good season" or some such by that point.
Troy Aikman is one of the top 3-4 QBs in the NFL no matter how you
slice it. I don't go along with this "overrated" stuff and never
have. I actually think more of him now after this season when he
performed well under much more adversity than before when he was only
damn near perfect under less trying circumstances.
glenn
|
9.3512 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Mike Lupica - Literary Giant! | Thu Feb 02 1995 11:19 | 10 |
|
Lost in all of the talk about the SF-Giants NFC title game is
that the Giants held the "best offense on the planet" (at that
time) to 13 points.
As far as Troy being overrated goes, I think calling him one
of "the 3-4 best QBs in the league" pretty much says it all.
One of the best, yes. "All World", no. Troy is still only the
3rd or 4th best player on his own team.
|
9.3513 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 02 1995 11:37 | 10 |
|
> As far as Troy being overrated goes, I think calling him one
> of "the 3-4 best QBs in the league" pretty much says it all.
> One of the best, yes. "All World", no. Troy is still only the
> 3rd or 4th best player on his own team.
One of the 3-4 best leaves it at Young, Marino, Aikman, maybe still
Montana when he's 100%. Choose whatever words you want but barring
disastrous injury that kind of company gets you into the Hall of
Fame which Aikman will make and which he _will_ deserve.
|
9.3514 | Aikman = Greenwell ... The early years!!!!!!! | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | jan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!! | Thu Feb 02 1995 11:47 | 9 |
|
After 4 seasons you already have Aikman in the Hall of Fame? Give
me a break! Whats his record when Emmitt doesn't start? When some of
his talent leaves this year ie.(either Irvin or Harper) we'll see how
good he really is.
Two more concussions and he'll be retiring!
|
9.3515 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Mike Lupica - Literary Giant! | Thu Feb 02 1995 11:49 | 3 |
|
C'mon, Chappy. If Aikamn was on the Buccaneers, they'd be the
ones with the two SB rings!
|
9.3516 | :^) | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Feb 02 1995 11:52 | 4 |
| > C'mon, Chappy. If Aikamn was on the Buccaneers, they'd be the
> ones with the two SB rings!
Let's not get carried away....
|
9.3517 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 02 1995 11:54 | 19 |
|
> -< Aikman = Greenwell ... The early years!!!!!!! >-
Yeah right, Chap. This speaks for itself...
> After 4 seasons you already have Aikman in the Hall of Fame?
No I don't already have him in the HOF. I said "barring disastrous
injury" which in Aikman's case is a possibility. What I'm saying is
that Aikman's talent is obvious and undeniable just as was Montana's
or Marino's after 4-5 years when it would have been completely
reasonable to talk about either of those two as future HOFers.
The BoyToy Myth is SPROTSdelusion rooted in a hatred of the Cowboys
that is not supported by 99% of what I've seen heard or read in the
real world...
glenn
|
9.3518 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | jan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!! | Thu Feb 02 1995 12:09 | 6 |
|
Glen what color is the sky in "your" real world?
Chap
|
9.3519 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Thu Feb 02 1995 12:14 | 11 |
| > I just have trouble following the Hal-logic that says since a
>NFC team has won the last 11 Super Bowls, then the NFC as a
>whole is a stronger conference than the AFC. That's as silly
>as saying that during the 70's when the AFC team dominated the
>Big Dance, the AFC, as a conference, was better than the NFC.
THe 11 consecutive Superbowl victories (with an *average* margin of
victory greater than 20 points) AND a history of interconference
W-L winning.
brews
|
9.3520 | still say he's top 5 to 10 | CNTROL::CHILDS | UMass > UConn | Thu Feb 02 1995 12:25 | 14 |
| dam straight the boytoy stuff is a ::sports delusion fueled by cowboy hatred.
thanks for noticing............
given the talent at his disposal he should have higher numbers but given that
he only throws 20 or so times a game when Emitt is healthy maybe not. His
playoff performances are his only real claim to fame but this year with a
hurtin' Emitt he starts the game spotting the niners 14 with 2 interceptions.
Not exactly numbers to be proud of for a supposed great one.
I'd love to see what a guy like Humphries, Bledsoe, Mirer or even Erickson
would do with the weapons at his disposal that the Boytoy has........
mike
|
9.3521 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Thu Feb 02 1995 12:35 | 6 |
| > dam straight the boytoy stuff is a ::sports delusion fueled by cowboy
> hatred.thanks for noticing............
Yeah, there's Glen sounding like that's a bad thing.
brews
|
9.3522 | I choose to see sunny, warm and pleasant... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 02 1995 12:54 | 9 |
|
> Glen what color is the sky in "your" real world?
Honolulu Blue which is also the color of the sky at that place where
those big know-nothing dummies from the NFL are sending Troy yet _again_.
glenn
|
9.3523 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Thu Feb 02 1995 13:20 | 11 |
| > THe 11 consecutive Superbowl victories (with an *average* margin of
> victory greater than 20 points) AND a history of interconference
> W-L winning.
Since the SB games are but ONE game per season between TWO teams
you're gonna hafta come up with some factoids to back up the
"history of interconference W-L winning" afore yer gonna
convince me.
billl
|
9.3524 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Thu Feb 02 1995 13:37 | 7 |
|
I was talking about the NFC vs. AFC record in that time period.
Someone mentioned a 53-47 margin since '70, and it would have to be
better than that (since I'd agreed that the AFC was stronger in the
70's) from '84 on.
brews
|
9.3525 | | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Thu Feb 02 1995 13:56 | 16 |
| >>a 53-47 margin
I guess that pretty much sums up my point regarding the "overwelming"
superiority of one conference over the other. It just isn't there.
I'll root for my team and you root for yours, but don't try and
force feed me that balonie about how the conference your team is
in is 'far' superior to the one mine is in. It doesn't wash.
I prefer to think that it's like the pendulum theory where there
are extremes to both ends but when all is said and done we find
ourselves pretty close to some middle ground.
billl
|
9.3526 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Feb 02 1995 14:45 | 8 |
| > I prefer to think that it's like the pendulum theory where there
> are extremes to both ends but when all is said and done we find
> ourselves pretty close to some middle ground.
Which is why a seeding system appeals to me. No matter where the pendulum
is at one point in time, we have a greater chance of getting the top 2
teams in the entire NFL into the SB if we throw out conference affiliation
and seed according to strength based on regular season results.
|
9.3527 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Thu Feb 02 1995 15:11 | 5 |
| re: Troy
Aikman is a latter day Bart Starr. A very good quarterback
with a great team. He has a lot ok skills, and doesn't
make a lot of mistakes.
|
9.3528 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 02 1995 15:15 | 18 |
| Seeding is a bad idea. At 1st I liked the idea but as someone said if the
best two teams end up in the AFC or NFC championship or even earlier then
that's the breaks.
The one thing that makes sports better than Hollywood is that you do not
always have a dramatic ending. Some times you do but sometimes you don't and
that makes the truly great games all that much better when they happen.
Things like the '12, '62 , or '75 World Series were great partly because they
were not planned. It just worked out that great teams ended up in the
championship and had a head to head contest going down to the wire.
If Super Sunday needs a boost because football only gives us one game in it's
championship then add a College superbowl. Rearrange the bowls as a tournament
so that they mean something then have the college teams go as the early game
and the pros as the late game on Super Sunday.
George
|
9.3529 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Time for Vacation... | Thu Feb 02 1995 15:33 | 12 |
|
I don't see a reason for seeding the teams. In all other sports the
seeding is still based on conference not the entire league. With
schedules weighted towards a division/conference/league schedule.
If they seeded the teams, then they would have to change the
scheduling. They would have to get rid of the 8 games in a division.
Since teams in a weak division would make it to the playoffs easier.
Which could potentially lead to the Patriots not playing Miami during
the season, Or Cleveland not playing Pittsburgh. It will never happen
because the NFL is all about rivalry's.
Ron
|
9.3530 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 02 1995 15:34 | 12 |
|
> Seeding is a bad idea. At 1st I liked the idea but as someone said if the
> best two teams end up in the AFC or NFC championship or even earlier then
> that's the breaks.
I'm very much against it too. I can see the NFL breaking down these
latest down TV ratings, though, and going ahead with it in some form.
I think it would leave a contrived feel to the playoffs and if it
happens it'll be a total sellout...
glenn
|
9.3531 | Ware to Jags | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Thu Feb 02 1995 15:34 | 4 |
| Just heard on the radio that Andre Ware has come to an agreement with
the Jacksonville Jaguars. No further details.
UMDan
|
9.3532 | Wonder if he'll start | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is FIVE!!! | Thu Feb 02 1995 15:56 | 4 |
| | Just heard on the radio that Andre Ware has come to an agreement with
| the Jacksonville Jaguars. No further details.
Parade in January, 1996.
|
9.3533 | Elway in the HOF??? | DNEAST::MARDEN_ROBER | Rangers, Broncos, Red Sox | Thu Feb 02 1995 23:53 | 16 |
| Reply .3513
What about Elway? If anyone he deserves to be on that list.
My top 5....
1: Young
2: Marino
3: Elway
4: Montana (3 years ago he would have been #1)
5: Aikman
After that......maybe throw Moon in there and Bledsoe is rising fast.
JMHO
Rob M.
|
9.3534 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Feb 03 1995 08:44 | 3 |
| Jim Kelly would certainly be in the top 5-6. Elway would not.
Mark.
|
9.3535 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | jan 1, 279, 270 267.. 230 or bust!!!! | Fri Feb 03 1995 08:56 | 12 |
|
Mine would be.
1 Young
Marino
Montana
Kelly
Smelway
Moon Aikman and bledsoe in my bottom 5
|
9.3536 | wheres bernice | STRATA::GARRY | | Fri Feb 03 1995 09:02 | 7 |
| What.......no one rates Kosar or Testaverde up there...I guess its
just a matter of time before we all know who writes in with his
usual trash........the same one that thought Swindell was better than
Clemens even though its 3 Cy Youngs to ZERO
Tom
|
9.3537 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Fri Feb 03 1995 09:22 | 16 |
| Glenn,
I wasn't saying "Well, it's been a great season".... The previous four
years had conditioned me to expect the Giants to pull something out of the
hat in the closing seconds, as the previous twenty before that had conditioned
me to expect the Giants to always blow a late game lead.
They did force a turnover. In football, I don't believe that's luck, really.
If it was luck, it's my contention that teams would all be about equal
in that department.
The bottom line is that when the game was over, the Giants had more points
than the Niners.
'Saw
|
9.3538 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Feb 03 1995 09:29 | 3 |
9.3539 | max_bench + iq < weight | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Feb 03 1995 09:33 | 6 |
9.3540 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 03 1995 09:50 | 29 |
|
> The bottom line is that when the game was over, the Giants had more points
> than the Niners.
Hey, I wasn't knocking the Giants. They actually did outplay the 49ers
in that game, overall (the 5 FGs alone suggests that they moved the
ball but were just unable to put it away). I was just going back to
the original point and stating that in no way was that team "dominant",
and in fact they needed a few breaks to win it all (which happens
fairly often, in any sport). 1990 was the exception, one of only two
years over the past 11 where the AFC needed to make no apologies
(Buffalo did go into the Super Bowl favored and in the way they played
they did not bring shame on themselves).
As a fan based on past experience you may have sincerely believed the
Giants absolutely were going to pull that game out and eventually the
championship, but in that past experience obviously they didn't always
do so. I even recall the Giants being eliminated from the playoffs on
their home field by the Rams. The outcome was by no means never in
doubt as _has_ been the case on several occasions over the past 11
years with some truly dominant teams.
Back to the problem, though, unlike the situation in 1990, in the
present it does still look as if San Fran and Dallas are superior to
anyone in the AFC and it might be a couple more years before that'll
change.
glenn
|
9.3541 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Fri Feb 03 1995 10:02 | 37 |
| > Hey, I wasn't knocking the Giants.
Well, I figured you owed me a few for all of my Cal comments 8^)
> the original point and stating that in no way was that team "dominant",
> and in fact they needed a few breaks to win it all (which happens
> fairly often, in any sport). 1990 was the exception, one of only two
> years over the past 11 where the AFC needed to make no apologies
I think that the Giants were dominant, but that they peaked early. They
were undefeated through the first ten, then lost something in the next
four. In the playoffs, the were good, but not dominant like in the
early games. Plus, Simms went down with an injury too. So, to me, it
really depends on what part of the season you look at.
> As a fan based on past experience you may have sincerely believed the
> Giants absolutely were going to pull that game out and eventually the
> championship, but in that past experience obviously they didn't always
> do so. I even recall the Giants being eliminated from the playoffs on
> their home field by the Rams. The outcome was by no means never in
> doubt as _has_ been the case on several occasions over the past 11
> years with some truly dominant teams.
No doubt. I remember 1989 well, the Flipper Anderson catch for the TD
in OT, which followed the bogus (well, we Giants fans believe it was
bogus) pass interferance call. That was truly a bad time.
But, I guess what I was trying to point out was the up until 1986,
Giants fans routinely figured we'd lose the close games -- we always had
it seemed. BUT, after 1986, our faith was strengthened...
'Saw
|
9.3542 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Feb 03 1995 11:26 | 9 |
| > Back to the problem, though, unlike the situation in 1990, in the
> present it does still look as if San Fran and Dallas are superior to
> anyone in the AFC and it might be a couple more years before that'll
> change.
If Deion and Watters don't re-sign, there could be trouble in SF next
year. Sanders makes EVERYONE on that defense better. Watters emerged
as a big offensive threat, as he was among NFL leaders in total offensive
yards.
|
9.3543 | | STRATA::GARRY | | Fri Feb 03 1995 13:24 | 5 |
| re 9.3539
I doubt your mom told you anything loser...after all the doctor slapped
her pretty good,when he got a look at you.
|
9.3544 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Feb 03 1995 13:55 | 5 |
9.3545 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | JAN,279,270,267,264.230 OR BUST | Fri Feb 03 1995 13:57 | 5 |
|
So are you two friends?
|
9.3546 | I have the scorebook to prove it | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Feb 03 1995 14:08 | 5 |
9.3547 | groaner wwrong again | STRATA::GARRY | | Fri Feb 03 1995 14:20 | 6 |
| Wrong again Mrs Mouth I never played in any DEC softball league........
get a life ...you must be a real beauty if keep sh*t like that..a
scorebook from 6-10 years ago......how old are you anyway 30 going
onto teenage years,.............
|
9.3548 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Feb 03 1995 14:30 | 4 |
9.3549 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Fri Feb 03 1995 14:33 | 4 |
|
Take it to 7THGRADE::SPORTS!
Claybone
|
9.3550 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Fri Feb 03 1995 14:36 | 3 |
9.3551 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Last day as a free man 7/8 | Sun Feb 05 1995 00:53 | 4 |
| Nah more like the pre-natal stage. Wait a minute I thought
ObnoxiousDawgs couldn't read or write!
The Crazy Met
|
9.3552 | | CSOA1::JACOB | | Sun Feb 05 1995 08:18 | 14 |
|
>> Mom told
>>me not to pick on people smaller than me when I was young. I'm sure
>>she meant mentally.
Groaner,
being yer a Clevescumite, I cain't believe you'd publicly make the
above statement, seeing it only allows you to pick on peoples with IQ's
LOWER than their shoe size, or, to be exact, the average Cincinnati
Bengals fan.
JaKe
|
9.3553 | NOT!!! | MKFSA::LONG | Close, but no cigar! | Mon Feb 06 1995 09:52 | 6 |
| Wow! That overpowering, much more talented, NFC team sure
looked good in Honolulu.
billl
|
9.3554 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Mon Feb 06 1995 10:09 | 3 |
9.3555 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Mon Feb 06 1995 12:01 | 4 |
| Groaner, *I* could have racked up 180 yards against that defense
yesterday.
Mark.
|
9.3556 | Do the math | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Mike Lupica - Literary Giant! | Mon Feb 06 1995 12:06 | 2 |
|
Tha AFC racked up 400 yards on 40 carries.
|
9.3557 | Another one bites the dust | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Mon Feb 06 1995 12:11 | 4 |
| It's truly a bad year for O.J. Not only is he up to his ears in legal
battles, but his pro-bowl rushing record was smashed twice yesterday.
Jerry
|
9.3558 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Happy 100th Bambino | Mon Feb 06 1995 12:16 | 6 |
| The NFL Pro Bowl is like the NHL Some Star Game, an exhibition,
at best where hitting is kept to a minimum. If the AFC backers
want to use this pathetic display to claim conference superiority,
they can, but it still will not win the conference a Super Bowl.
/Don
|
9.3559 | Sanders Ain't Going Anywhere | STRATA::BARBIERI | God cares. | Mon Feb 06 1995 13:06 | 4 |
| I heard something to the effect that Nike's (I think its Nike)
offer to Deion Sanders is like 2 mil more if he stays in San Fran.
Its a bummer, but San Fran has the luxury of people receiving
extra money outside of the team's own expense/the cap.
|
9.3560 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Last day as a free man 7/8 | Mon Feb 06 1995 13:25 | 5 |
| Sega's offer to Sanders increases by a LOT if he stays in SF. I wonder
if the NFL will find that to be an unfari competitive advantage.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3561 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Pottie training is hell!!! | Mon Feb 06 1995 13:41 | 8 |
| | Sega's offer to Sanders increases by a LOT if he stays in SF. I wonder
| if the NFL will find that to be an unfari competitive advantage.
Yea, it's Sega. Dion gets $2.5 mil if he stays with SF,
but only $1.5 mil if he plays elsewhere. Guess it must
be cheaper than a software upgrade project.
=Bob=
|
9.3562 | Speaking of wierd, how's OJ, Tanya and Mike these days | AKOCOA::BREEN | That is enough for me and for thee | Mon Feb 06 1995 13:51 | 9 |
| I think the contract with NIke that Jordan had was worse since Nike put
a lot of $bucks into NBA as advertiser. This is awfully close to a
conflict of interest.
As some of you know my mind works a little differently but after seeing
my pick of Orlando as '94 champ go down in round 1 I decided the reason
for that was that Shaq wasn't wearing Nikes (Reebok?).
Okay, far-fetched? Yes, but isn't this a far-fetched world.
|
9.3563 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | pet rocks, pogs, Dallas Cowboys | Tue Feb 07 1995 12:03 | 17 |
|
> <<< Note 9.3525 by MKFSA::LONG "Close, but no cigar!" >>>
> >>a 53-47 margin
> I guess that pretty much sums up my point regarding the "overwelming"
> superiority of one conference over the other. It just isn't there.
Boy, guys gone for a few days and people start taking his notes
completely out of context. C'mon Bill, look at hte whole note. that
53-47 margin is since 1970, we've been talking in here since '84.
Everyone has pretty much agreed that the AFC owned the 70's so the
margin has to be bigger since '84.
brews
|
9.3564 | | METSNY::francus | Last day as a free man 7/8 | Tue Feb 07 1995 12:40 | 5 |
| The NYT or Globe had the stats of NFC vs. AFC for the last 11 years,
It was something like 18?? - 17?? in favor of the NFC. Again not an
overwhelming margin.
The Crazy Met
|
9.3565 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Tue Feb 07 1995 14:40 | 11 |
| While, I'm probably stating the obvious {pause here for everyone to yell
at me about that}, but the crux of the matter isn't so much that one conference
has more talent than the other, or is overwhelmingly better, it's just that
the way the talent is pooled into teams has favored one conference for a while.
It just so happens that the two best collections of talent in the NFL right
now happen to reside in Dallas and San Francisco, as opposed to Buffalo
and San Diego....
'Saw
|
9.3566 | From my archives - straight winners by conf | AKOCOA::BREEN | That is enough for me and for thee | Tue Feb 07 1995 17:25 | 23 |
| NFC AFC
Total for Year: 88 21 27
(missing weeks 1,2)
Total for Year: 89 22 24
Missiing weeks 1,2)
Total for Year: 90 26 26
Missing week 1
Total for Year: 91 33 19
Missing week 1
Total for Year: 92 31 21
Missing week 1
Total for Year: 94 21 18
Missing 1-5
Total for 88-95: 154 135
|
9.3567 | 88-95 by the spread (via my 1/2 to home team) | AKOCOA::BREEN | That is enough for me and for thee | Tue Feb 07 1995 17:27 | 24 |
| NFC AFC
Total for Year: 88 25 23
Total for Year: 89 25 21
Total for Year: 90 19 33
Total for Year: 91 31 21
Total for Year: 92 26 26
Total for Year: 94 24 15
Total for 88-95: 150 139
|
9.3568 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 08 1995 08:41 | 7 |
| Billte,
If'n I cain remember to do it, I can get figures for you for the missing
weeks. I've got a football encyclopedia that would have them.....
'Saw
|
9.3569 | Is your source on-line? | AKOCOA::BREEN | That is enough for me and for thee | Wed Feb 08 1995 10:13 | 7 |
| '93 should be right in here. The first few weeks for '88-92 would fill
it out. Of course the lines used by me or anybody else don't
necessarily represent what you can actually lay on the phone or
otherwise.
The wagering scene I'm most interested in the Ontario Lottery. I'd
love to here comments on people who play that.
|
9.3570 | | CAMONE::WAY | Conspiring to make a mutiny... | Wed Feb 08 1995 11:24 | 4 |
| No, it's not on-line. It's hard copy, through '92 I think, of all the
scores and stats.
Wish it was on-line....8^)
|
9.3571 | Beuerlein goes firsted | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 12:17 | 6 |
| The firsted round is complete.
Jacksonville took Steve Beuerlein, QB Arizona
Charlotte took Rod Smith, DB, New England
TTom
|
9.3572 | firsted three rounds | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 12:33 | 11 |
| Expansion Draft.
1. Jacksonville - Steve Beuerlein, QB, Arizona
Charlotte - Rod Smith, DB, New England
2. Jacksonville - Corey Raymond, DB, Giants
Charlotte - Harry Boatswain, OT, San Francisco
3. Jacksonville - Jeff Novak, G, Miami
Charlotte - Kurt Haws, TE, Washington
|
9.3573 | Rounds 4 and 5 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 12:56 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
4. Jacksonville - John Duff, TE, Raiders
Charlotte - Tyrone Rodgers, DE, Seattle
5. Jacksonville - Keith Goganious, LB, Buffalo
Charlotte - Mark Thomas, DE, San Francisco
|
9.3574 | Rounds 6 and 7 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 13:20 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
6. Jacksonville - Mark Williams, LB, Green Bay
Charlotte - Tim McKyer, DB, Pittsburgh
7. Jacksonville - Al Jackson, DB, Philadelphia
Charlotte - Curtis Whitley, C, San Diego
|
9.3575 | | CAMONE::WAY | Time to align the data! | Wed Feb 15 1995 13:26 | 8 |
| Are they releasing the names that the other teams are pulling from their
eligibility lists as the players are chosen?
Raymond was chosen from the Giants. Whose name did they remove? Anyone
know?
'Saw
|
9.3576 | some | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 13:33 | 9 |
| They aren't doing a very good job of the pull backs.
After a pick, they're giving the team who loses the player 2 minutes to
pull back.
I've heard a couple. Ricky Proehl, after Beuerlein. Stan White was pulled
by the Giants after Raymond. Mike Gisler has been pulled.
TTom
|
9.3577 | | CAMONE::WAY | Time to align the data! | Wed Feb 15 1995 13:38 | 7 |
| >I've heard a couple. Ricky Proehl, after Beuerlein. Stan White was pulled
>by the Giants after Raymond. Mike Gisler has been pulled.
>
>TTom
Thanks TTom.....
|
9.3578 | Rounds 8 and 9 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 13:40 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
8. Jacksonville - Mark Tucker, C, Arizona
Charlotte - Howard Griffith, RB, Rams
9. Jacksonville - Paul Frase, DE, Jets
Charlotte - Greg Kragen, DT, Kansas City
|
9.3579 | | MKFSA::LONG | The Igloo is rockin'! | Wed Feb 15 1995 13:53 | 7 |
| >> Charlotte - Tim McKyer, DB, Pittsburgh
Can I get an AMEN??!!!!
billl
|
9.3580 | Full Name Provided | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Feb 15 1995 13:58 | 4 |
| >2. Jacksonville - Corey Raymond, DB, Giants
> Charlotte - Harry Boatswain, OT, San Francisco
Harry 'Turnstile' Boatswain
|
9.3581 | Rounds 10 and 11 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 14:04 | 9 |
| Expansion Draft:
10. Jacksonville - Tom Myslinski, G, Chicago
Charlotte - Cary Brabham, DB, Raiders
11. Jacksonville - Willie Jackson, WR, Dallas
Charlotte - Dave Garnett, LB, Minnesota
Couple of pullbacks: Tryone Montgomery, Raiders; Jason Garrett, Dallas
|
9.3582 | Rounds 12 and 13 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 14:24 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
12. Jacksonville - Othello Henderson, DB, New Orleans
Charlotte - Andre Powell, LB, Giants
13. Jacksonville - Santo Stephens, LB, Cincinnati
Charlotte - Dewell Brewer, RB, Indianapolis
|
9.3583 | Rounds 14 and 15 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 14:43 | 7 |
| Expansion Draft:
14. Jacksonville - Darren Carrington, DB, San Deigo
Charlotte - Bob Christian, RB, Chicago
15. Jacksonville - Michael Davis, DB, Houston
Charlotte - Fred Foggie, DB, Pittsburgh
|
9.3584 | Rounds 16-18 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 15:09 | 11 |
| Expansion Draft:
16. Jacksonville - Dave Thomas, DB, Dallas
Charlotte - Mark Carrier, WR, Cleveland
17. Jacksonville - Mazio Royster, RB, Tampa Bay
Charlotte - Mark Rodenhauser, C, Detroit
18. Jacksonville - Le'Shai Maston, RB, Houston
Charlotte - Steve Hawkins, WR, New England
|
9.3585 | Rounds 19 and 20 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 15:25 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
19. Jacksonville - Charles Davenport, WR, Pittsburgh
Charlotte - Brian O'Neal, RB, Philadelphia
20. Jacksonville - Monty Grow, DB, Kansas City
Charlotte - Derrick Lassic, RB, Dallas
|
9.3586 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Feb 15 1995 15:39 | 5 |
| billl,
who do you think you are Reverend Billy Sol Harkness??
The Crazy Met
|
9.3587 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Feb 15 1995 15:40 | 1 |
| How many DBs has Jacksonville drafted ???
|
9.3588 | da rosters so far... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Wed Feb 15 1995 15:42 | 22 |
| Jacksonville Charlotte
1. Steve Beuerlein, QB, Arizona Rod Smith, DB, New England
2. Corey Raymond, DB, Giants Harry Boatswain, OT, San Francisco
3. Jeff Novak, G, Miami Kurt Haws, TE, Washington
4. John Duff, TE, Raiders Tyrone Rodgers, DE, Seattle
5. Keith Goganious, LB, Buffalo Mark Thomas, DE, San Francisco
6. Mark Williams, LB, Green Bay Tim McKyer, DB, Pittsburgh
7. Al Jackson, DB, Philadelphia Curtis Whitley, C, San Diego
8. Mark Tucker, C, Arizona Howard Griffith, RB, Rams
9. Paul Frase, DE, Jets Greg Kragen, DT, Kansas City
10. Tom Myslinski, G, Chicago Cary Brabham, DB, Raiders
11. Willie Jackson, WR, Dallas Dave Garnett, LB, Minnesota
12. Othello Henderson, DB, New Orleans Andre Powell, LB, Giants
13. Santo Stephens, LB, Cincinnati Dewell Brewer, RB, Indianapolis
14. Darren Carrington, DB, San Deigo Bob Christian, RB, Chicago
15. Michael Davis, DB, Houston Fred Foggie, DB, Pittsburgh
16. Dave Thomas, DB, Dallas Mark Carrier, WR, Cleveland
17. Mazio Royster, RB, Tampa Bay Mark Rodenhauser, C, Detroit
18. Le'Shai Maston, RB, Houston Steve Hawkins, WR, New England
19. Charles Davenport, WR, Pittsburgh Brian O'Neal, RB, Philadelphia
20. Monty Grow, DB, Kansas City Derrick Lassic, RB, Dallas
|
9.3589 | Rounds 21 and 22 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 15:46 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
21. Jacksonville - Marcus Wilson, RB, Green Bay
Charlotte - Richard Buchanan, WR, LA Rams
22. Jacksonville - Brant Boyer, LB, Miami
Charlotte - Doug Pederson, QB, Miami
|
9.3590 | Rounds 23 and 24 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 16:06 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
23. Jacksonville - Harry Colon, DB, Detroit
Charlotte - Vince Marrow, TE, Buffalo
24. Jacksonville - Derek Brown, TE, NY Giants
Charlotte - Larry Ryans, WR, Detroit
|
9.3591 | Rounds 25 and 26 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 16:20 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
25. Jacksonville - James Williams, LB, New Olreans
Charlotte - Baron Rollins, G, New Orleans
26. Jacksonville - Eugene Chung, G, New England
Charlotte - William Sims, LB, Minnesota
|
9.3592 | | CAMONE::WAY | Time to align the data! | Wed Feb 15 1995 16:25 | 8 |
| >24. Jacksonville - Derek Brown, TE, NY Giants
The Giants dump the loser! The Giants dump the loser! The Giants dump
the loser! The Giants dump the loser!
|
9.3593 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | If nothing's right, What's wrong? | Wed Feb 15 1995 16:29 | 2 |
|
still got Reeves though...........
|
9.3594 | rounds 27 and 28 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 16:34 | 8 |
| Expansion Draft:
27. Jacksonville - Reggie Cobb, RB, Green Bay
Charlotte - Paul Butcher, LB, Indianapolis
28. Jacksonville - Desmond Howard, WR, Washington
Charlotte - Jack Trudeau, QB, NY Jets
|
9.3595 | | CAMONE::WAY | Time to align the data! | Wed Feb 15 1995 16:38 | 13 |
| > <<< Note 9.3593 by CNTROL::CHILDS "If nothing's right, What's wrong?" >>>
>
>
> still got Reeves though...........
Thanks Mike. Thanks a lot.
I was going to go home, have a nice meal, pack a few boxes, make a few
more moving arrangments, and enjoy the fact that we got rid of Brown.
You had to spoil it for me, didn't you! 8^)
|
9.3596 | Rounds 29 and 30 | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 16:46 | 7 |
| Expansion Draft:
29. Jacksonville - Kelvin Martin, WR, Seattle
Charlotte - Charles Swann, WR, Denver
30. Jacksonville - Cedric Tillan, WR, Denver
Charlotte - David Mims, WR, Atlanta
|
9.3597 | | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Feb 15 1995 17:10 | 3 |
| How many rounds are there in the expansion draft???
|
9.3598 | Rounds 31-35 (lasted) | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Wed Feb 15 1995 17:10 | 16 |
| Expansion Draft:
31. Jacksonville - Rogerick Green, DB, Tampa Bay
Charlotte - Shawn Price, DE, Tampa Bay
32. Jacksonville - pass
Charlotte - Eric Guilford, WR, Minnesota
33. Jacksonville - pass
Charlotte - Bill Goldberg, DT, Atlanta
34. Jacksonville - pass
Charlotte - Eric Ball, RB, Cincinnati
35. Jacksonville - pass
Charlotte - Mike Teeter, DT, Houston
|
9.3599 | Good riddance, Desmond! | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Wed Feb 15 1995 17:40 | 7 |
| So Jacksonville gets ol' Desmond Howard from the 'Skins. I think he
was in the last (or next to last) year of his contract. Wonder how
much he is gonna cost Jax? What a bust. And to think they gave up
another 1st round pick to get him (I think they bundled two first round
pick together to move up in that years draft).
UMDan
|
9.3600 | SNARF | OUTSRC::HEISER | Grace changes everything | Wed Feb 15 1995 17:42 | 1 |
9.3601 | many $s | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Thu Feb 16 1995 09:37 | 8 |
| Ol' Desmond Tutu Moe Howard will cost the Jaguars $1.77 mil.
All in all, the Jaguars committed themselves to spend $15+ mil.
The Panthers are on the hook for only $9+ mil. The local talk is that the
Panthers will get into the free agent market in a big way.
TTom
|
9.3602 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Thu Feb 16 1995 09:44 | 6 |
| So how does this RFA thang work? If the teams drafted RFAs, are the RFAs still
free to negotiate with other teams, with the expansions teams free to match? Is
this just a ploy to keep payrolls down (ie the expansion teams will let many of
the RFAs go to other clubs, so they can concentrate on other FAs)?
=Bob=
|
9.3603 | woops! TTom answered me in 142.180 | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Potty training is hell!!! | Thu Feb 16 1995 09:45 | 0 |
9.3604 | maybe | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Thu Feb 16 1995 09:46 | 7 |
| You got the mechanics correct.
Don't know about the intentions. Locally, the Panthers are dismissing
this idea, that they just took some players and hope some go to other
clubs. Of course, that may just be a public posture.
TTom
|
9.3605 | Rison gone | HBAHBA::HAAS | Plan 9 from Outer Space | Fri Feb 17 1995 17:24 | 4 |
| I think I just heard that Andre Rison was cut, waived or otherwise
disowned by the Falcons.
TTom
|
9.3606 | WHY?! | MKOTS3::TCC051::CORRIGAN | | Tue Apr 04 1995 11:10 | 4 |
|
what's the "Y" in Y.A. Tittle or Tittel or Tiddle or Tiddel?!?!
|
9.3607 | yo mammy? | HBAHBA::HAAS | recurring recusancy | Tue Apr 04 1995 11:14 | 0 |
9.3608 | Yelverton (Abraham?) Tittle | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Apr 04 1995 11:18 | 1 |
|
|
9.3609 | | CAMONE::WAY | USS Pickerel SS-177, On Eternal Patrol | Tue Apr 04 1995 13:31 | 8 |
| > -< Yelverton (Abraham?) Tittle >-
Close.
It's Yelberton Abraham Tittle......
|
9.3610 | no wonder he went by Y.A.!!!!! | MKOTS3::TCC051::CORRIGAN | | Tue Apr 04 1995 13:43 | 4 |
|
thanx
|
9.3611 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | It's the Champale talking! | Tue Apr 04 1995 15:04 | 4 |
| Packers traded Terrell Buckley to the Fins for past considerations.
What the **** are "past considerations"?
UMDan
|
9.3612 | | AGNT99::CHILDS | End Corporate Welfare Instead! | Tue Apr 04 1995 15:16 | 9 |
|
> Packers traded Terrell Buckley to the Fins for past considerations.
> What the **** are "past considerations"?
Keith Jackson? Lewis Oliver? Didn't the Packers give up a spot in the draft
to the Dolphins so they could get Oliver??????? Mark Ingram?
mike
|
9.3613 | :^) | USCTR1::GARBARINO | bumhiem, lappas...idiots | Tue Apr 04 1995 15:20 | 5 |
| > Keith Jackson? Lewis Oliver? Didn't the Packers give up a spot in the draft
> to the Dolphins so they could get Oliver??????? Mark Ingram?
Jackson and Ingram. Oliver is with Cincinnati now. Maybe Jackson is
SO overweight that the Pack MADE Miami take Buckley to even things up.
|
9.3614 | not exactly sad to see him go | POBOX::WIERSBECK | | Tue Apr 04 1995 17:17 | 5 |
| Packers move = addition by subtraction. Buckley being gone has caused
hysteria in cheeseland! ;*)
Spud
|
9.3615 | should have stayed home...results would have been the same | USCTR1::GARBARINO | bumhiem, lappas...idiots | Wed Apr 05 1995 12:38 | 7 |
| > Packers move = addition by subtraction. Buckley being gone has caused
> hysteria in cheeseland! ;*)
That truly was a BAD day for Wolf (Packers GM). If you remember, they
wanted Desmond Howard, and their attempts to move up to get him failed.
Washington moved ahead of GB and snagged him. So the Pack ends up
taking Buckley.
|
9.3616 | Buckley and Vincent | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Wed Apr 05 1995 17:44 | 12 |
| The Pack also drafted before Miami that year. The top rated
corners were Troy Vincent out of Wisconsin and Terrel Buckley
out of Florida State. So the Wisconsin team takes the Floridian
and the Dolphins settle for the guy from Wisconsin.
The Pack said they chose Buckley because of his other abilities
(special teams). Buckley proceeded to fumble so many punts that
he asked to be relieved of those duties. And as for pass coverage...
well, he wasn't working out.
The Pack has been abysmal so far as drafting defensive corners is
concerned.
|
9.3617 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | bumhiem, lappas...idiots | Wed Apr 05 1995 17:54 | 5 |
| > The Pack has been abysmal so far as drafting defensive corners is
> concerned.
So true. They should never DRAFT one again. Instead, they should just
buy a proven veteran when they need one.
|
9.3618 | St. Louis Rams | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Apr 12 1995 19:02 | 5 |
|
Looks like the Rams are moving after all. Owners approved it today.
Kevin
|
9.3619 | The St Louis Rams (Rams have sucked since Dickerson left) | MR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKS | | Thu Apr 13 1995 09:00 | 3 |
| I Didnt see or hear anything on this ???? It wouldnt happen until when
?????
mab
|
9.3620 | Pretty sure it's for this season | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | It's the Champale talking! | Thu Apr 13 1995 09:58 | 12 |
| Rams move happens in time for the upcoming season (pretty sure). This
leaves only one team in the NFC West that is West of the Mississippi -
SF ( I know, St. Louis is a little west of the Mississippi, but why
quibble with a couple of miles. And that could change if they get
another big flood!).
Looks like the Owners would rather switch than fight this one out in
court.
Al Davis has gotta love this!
UMDan
|
9.3621 | | DELNI::FORGET | | Thu Apr 13 1995 11:34 | 9 |
|
yesterday on ESPN, they said the Rams are moving, then Showed the
Commish says that a NFC team in Los Angeles is a priority. Second
largest market in the U.S.
|
9.3622 | L.A. Cardinals | OUTSRC::HEISER | next year in Jerusalem! | Thu Apr 13 1995 12:46 | 1 |
9.3623 | ex | MKOTS3::LONG | Life is better left to chance. | Wed May 24 1995 19:58 | 11 |
| got the following off the net this evening...
"The Cleveland Browns and Cincinnati Bengals were mentioned as
possible teams to move to Los Angeles, which was left with only
one team with the departure of the Rams."
I'm suprised neither Groaner nor Hal (who?) have mentioned this.
billl
|
9.3624 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Life is better left to chance. | Wed May 24 1995 20:21 | 9 |
| Also from this article (from starwave) was mention of the owners
considering increasing the number of playoff teams from 12 to 16.
Having teams bid to sponsor the divisional championship, ala
Stupid Bowl, is being discussed, too.
Both suck, IMHO
billl
|
9.3625 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Life is better left to chance. | Wed May 24 1995 20:24 | 17 |
| The more I read of this the better it gets...
"The owners established a fund to help the league's less profitable
teams.
Tagliabue said 15 teams are under the league average. Under the plan, a
pool will be established so that teams suffering financial woes can
apply for money from a league committee.
The pool will be established from the $20 million the Rams are paying
to move to St. Louis and from permanent seat licenses sold in
Jacksonville, St. Louis and Carolina."
I guess they owe a special thanks to TTom and his friends.
billl
|
9.3626 | good riddance | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu May 25 1995 12:31 | 1 |
9.3627 | | SALEM::DODA | Chairman of the Bored | Thu May 25 1995 12:50 | 11 |
| <<< Note 9.3623 by MKOTS3::LONG "Life is better left to chance." >>>
-< ex >-
> "The Cleveland Browns and Cincinnati Bengals were mentioned as
> possible teams to move to Los Angeles, which was left with only
> one team with the departure of the Rams."
How long before the protests start? In LA, I mean....
daryll
|
9.3628 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Fifty lashes with a wet squirrel | Thu May 25 1995 12:55 | 3 |
|
Moving the Browns to LA would be appropriate since the sky is always
brown the name would have real meaning.
|
9.3629 | I can't believe I'm defending Clevescum | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu May 25 1995 13:48 | 17 |
|
Ever since I wus rockin in a cradle, I have proudly worn the colors of
Black n Gold. So ya all know I'm no Clevescum fan. But I think it
would be a huge injustice to move the 'Spots to LA. All of dem mutant
people who look like they're wearing masks(but really aren't) have
supported the 'Spots with enthusiasm not seen in most major league cities.
In LA, ya got the empty seats in the Coliseum and the people who do
come seem more interested in catchin a sun tan or takin a nap. Contrast
the atmosphere of the Coliseum with that in the Dawg pound of Clevescum
Municicesspool stadium and you'll know where the hearts and minds are.
I wus once kidnapped at gunpoint and forced to spend some time in the
Mistake by the Lake. While there, I learned that the people of Clevescum
follow the Browns with a passion. Northwestern Ohio is real football
country, 2nd only to Western Pa.
Keith
|
9.3630 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certified Looney | Thu May 25 1995 14:04 | 5 |
| Keith, they follow the Browns cause "Browns" is the only six-letter
word they cain spell.
JaKe
|
9.3631 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Thu May 25 1995 14:17 | 5 |
| Jake, I dint know they could spell any 6 letter words. I thought
they were named Browns cuz that's the only color they know in
Clevescum.
Keith
|
9.3632 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certified Looney | Thu May 25 1995 14:20 | 6 |
| Nah, they're named Browns cause they look like sh_t, smell like sh_t,
and play like sh_t, and as aforementioned, it's the biggest word the
mutants of the area cain spell.
JaKe
|
9.3633 | Bengals to LA if you ask me... | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Thu May 25 1995 14:37 | 10 |
|
I'd say the Bengals will be moving to LA. A lien was just put
on the Bengals for ~34 million by the IRS. The Bengals family (Brown)
is in the same predicament that the Robbie family was, down in Miami.
Dad dies and the IRS wants the inheritence money. The only way the
family can pay the IRS. Is to sell the team to get the money. So look
for Tagliabue to help the Brown family sell the Bengals to an LA
investor.
Ron
|
9.3634 | Keep the Browns in Cleveland (Please). | MR1PST::THEKGB::MBROOKS | | Thu May 25 1995 14:52 | 9 |
| I have to agree with a noter back a few, moving the browns is stupid
to even consider. They have HUGE fan support (WHY I DONT UNDERSTAND).
And HISTORY, I figure they'll just keep expanding until every city
has a least 1 team, then a 20 game season and develope a HOCKEY type
Playoff system so over 70% of the teams make the playoffs, now if
they could just have a bunch of 7 games playoff series too make the
regular season POINTLESS they could be more like Hockey.
MaB
|
9.3635 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | Maranatha! | Thu May 25 1995 14:57 | 1 |
9.3636 | Any News? | KIRKTN::HBOGIE | | Tue Jun 13 1995 05:26 | 12 |
|
So what is happening with the Browns?
They may not be the best team in the NFL, but their fans are the
most loyal in the league. I know, as I've been in the Dawg pound a few
times myself.
"Worried" Dawg fan from Scotland!
|
9.3637 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:08 | 9 |
9.3638 | ? | KIRKTN::HBOGIE | | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:46 | 9 |
|
Where did Foster go to?
Shug.
|
9.3639 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 13 1995 08:54 | 7 |
9.3640 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Tue Jun 13 1995 09:46 | 14 |
|
>>had a solid draft. The Steelers have lost Green, Anderson and
>>Foster with nothing to show for it. JaKe *thinks* this is not a
>>problem, but Pittsburgh didn't exactly score at will last year,
Show me where I said that this is "not a problem".
Anyways, the Brown(spot)s(tm) still have Vinny "Two good games a
season" Testicleverde, who throws interceptions at the rate which
McDonalds sells hamburgers, as their starting QB. With that in mind,
they surely ain't a lock to win the Central.
JaKe
|
9.3641 | some losses, but ... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Co-Captor of the Wind Demon | Tue Jun 13 1995 09:46 | 13 |
| Anderson has peaked and has declining skills.
Foster has a_attitude problem that continues to dog him with the Panthers
- he's had to sit out several mini-camp sessions because of "exhaustion".
Green has a_attitude problem but will be the one most missed.
So you could make the case that the Steelers have lost something in these
players getting gone.
However, it must be acknowledged that the Browns, desptie and signings,
still have Vinnie at the helm, who, no matter how far they go, will
eventually choke. There's no debate that Vinnie'll blow it. Only when.
TTom
|
9.3642 | | PTOSS1::JACOBR | Certifiably Insane | Tue Jun 13 1995 09:50 | 4 |
| notes collision
JaKe
|
9.3643 | great minds; same gutter | HBAHBA::HAAS | Co-Captor of the Wind Demon | Tue Jun 13 1995 09:53 | 0 |
9.3644 | | SALEM::DODA | Bob Kraft, man of beneficence | Tue Jun 13 1995 11:05 | 5 |
| That's:
Vinny "You pick the comeback, I'll throw the interception" Testeverde
daryll
|
9.3645 | Browns lucky enough last year | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Networks Sales & Marketing | Tue Jun 13 1995 17:24 | 4 |
| Defensively the Browns lost the NT Michael Dean Perry and some other
Linebacker to the Bronco's how did they fix that in the draft ?
Jeff
|
9.3646 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 13 1995 17:27 | 8 |
9.3647 | Who's gonna fill the Hole ? | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Networks Sales & Marketing | Tue Jun 13 1995 17:29 | 3 |
| He was only jumping off-sides cause of Elway's cadence.
|
9.3648 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | The dream is always the same... | Tue Jun 13 1995 17:42 | 4 |
9.3649 | Big Bad John will return | HBAHBA::HAAS | improbable cause | Fri Jul 14 1995 13:40 | 13 |
| Just when it looked like it'd be a long hot summer with nothin but NASCAR
to save me from MLB, Big Bad John comes along and reminds me that
football is just around the corner.
Seems like we're gonna have ol' Elway around for a few more years. He has
declared himself fit despite a deteriorating knee:
"I don't think it's in any worse shape than it's been in
for the last three or four years."
Well, he's aint looked all that great for these said same lasted years.
TTom
|
9.3650 | | LOCK::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Fri Jul 14 1995 15:54 | 6 |
|
"deteriorating knee"? He doesn't even have an ACL in one of
them! That bulky brace is the only thing holding it together
when he plays. Yup, ole John has lost what speed he had....
Claybone
|
9.3651 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Jul 19 1995 11:33 | 7 |
| re: Elway's knee problem
In Shanahan's offense he won't have to run. In fact, they could put him
in the shotgun most of the time (ala Marino) and let him use that strong
arm to pick apart defenses with that short passing game. I think Elway's
arm strength can give him at least a few more good years in the NFL, *IF*
he will convert himself to a pure drop-back, pocket passer.
|
9.3652 | Warrant for Blades | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Wed Jul 19 1995 12:11 | 22 |
| and meanwhile,
Brian Blades, Seattle receiver, has been charged with felonious
manslaughter in the death of his cousin, Charles Blades, on July 5.
Originally, Blades and others maintained that the death was accidental
even though 2 gun shots were heard. During the investigation, police
found forensic evidence that the gun was very close to the guys head when
fired.
Now, the police think they have it figgered out. Bennie Blades, Brian's
brother, and Brian were supposedly arguing. The cousin tried to
intervene. Brian went and got his gun and in a struggle with the cousin,
shot him.
The police claim there is no evidence to support the accidental shooting.
They also say there is no evidence of premeditation, hence the charge is
manslaughter, not murder.
Brian is headed back to Florida to answer the charges.
TTom
|
9.3653 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Jul 19 1995 12:49 | 15 |
| >Brian Blades, Seattle receiver, has been charged with felonious
>manslaughter in the death of his cousin, Charles Blades, on July 5.
Couldn't see this one coming, could you ? Not willing to give a
statement to the police...his agent (aka scum-sucking leach) saying
he was too upset to talk about it....
ESPNET has a very good article on the Blades brothers' backgrounds
and you can easily believe that this guy "lost it" for a brief moment...
that the gun didn't just accidentally fire.
Sports used to be fun. Paraphrasing an old Stevie Wonder song:
"sports in need of sports today..."
|
9.3654 | Maybe if he already had the gun on his person I could see it | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jul 19 1995 13:24 | 12 |
|
> They also say there is no evidence of premeditation, hence the charge is
> manslaughter, not murder.
Pretty lenient, it seems. Normally isn't premeditation the criterion
for 1st-degree murder? I guess this is one of those Florida things,
where with the courts jam-packed, if'n it's part of an ongoing fight
you can go grab your gun and ring off a couple of shots, then claim
it was unintentional...
glenn
|
9.3655 | Ts & Cs | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Wed Jul 19 1995 14:17 | 12 |
| Glenn,
I think it's a Florida definition.
Locally, all killings that are felonies are called some flavor of murder.
Manslaughter is a misdemeanor.
This is a felony manslaughter charge that carries up to 20 or 30 years.
That sounds like what NC calls 2nd degree or non-capital (caint get the
death sentence) murder.
TTom
|
9.3656 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jul 19 1995 17:36 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3654 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>
> Pretty lenient, it seems. Normally isn't premeditation the criterion
> for 1st-degree murder? I guess this is one of those Florida things,
It varies from state to state. In California, premeditation is the difference
between 1st and 2nd degree murder and manslaughter is a crime of passion.
In Massachusetts there is no definition, only penalties so they default to
the rules of Common Law. Under Common Law 2nd degree Murder is a crime of
passion or a murder with mitigating circumstances and Manslaughter is a
Homicide committed without malice aforethought.
Your mileage may vary in other states but most states consider manslaughter
to be a felony, not a misdemeanor.
George
|
9.3657 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Wed Jul 19 1995 19:39 | 7 |
|
...and in Colorado there is the "make my day" law. If someone is
breaking into my house, I can shoot them dead. No warning shots,
nothing.
Marc
|
9.3658 | COOL! | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Jul 19 1995 22:58 | 1 |
9.3659 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Thu Jul 20 1995 09:45 | 13 |
| > ...and in Colorado there is the "make my day" law. If someone is
> breaking into my house, I can shoot them dead. No warning shots,
> nothing.
This should be a federal law. I'm sure there'd be a lot less breaking and
entering.
I'm curious as to how many shots you could fire before you become liable
for something. If you hit the guy in the shoulder and disarm him, *then*
drill him between the eyes, are you liable for something like 2nd degree
murder? The exact wording of the law really determines its effectiveness.
Roland
|
9.3660 | Ready, Aim, Fire.... | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Jul 20 1995 09:53 | 16 |
| >I'm curious as to how many shots you could fire before you become liable
>for something. If you hit the guy in the shoulder and disarm him, *then*
>drill him between the eyes, are you liable for something like 2nd degree
>murder? The exact wording of the law really determines its effectiveness.
It's been a while since I lived in CO, but if I recall correctly, as long as
they was in your house and breathing, you had the ok to shoot 'em. In fact, the
person didn't even have to be armed to begin with, just as long as they were
in your house.
There was (and I imagine still is) a lot of talk about the fairness of this and
the possibility of an innocent getting plugged. All I know is there were a lot
less house break ins that I heard about out there then around here in Mass.
zamboni
|
9.3661 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 09:57 | 30 |
| >
>I'm curious as to how many shots you could fire before you become liable
>for something. If you hit the guy in the shoulder and disarm him, *then*
>drill him between the eyes, are you liable for something like 2nd degree
>murder? The exact wording of the law really determines its effectiveness.
>
Course, if it's you and him, just say that you pulled off two quick rounds.
Who's gonna prove which hit him first? 8^)
In CT, the law is a little weirder. It depends on where you are in the house,
and where the breakin is occuring when it comes to determining the threat
level.
For example, if you're on the second floor, and the break-in is on the first
floor, the law deems that you could, without threat, call the police, lock your
bedroom door and wait. If you go downstairs to shoot the guy, it's a horse of
a different color.
However, if you're on the first floor and the break-in is there, you can shoot
away.
A cop told me once if the guy is climbing in a window, you shoot him and he
falls out, he said to bring the body INSIDE before calling the police 8^)
'Saw
|
9.3662 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jul 20 1995 10:56 | 3 |
|
I think mass was or is one of the worst places to shoot an intruder or
anyone intent on committing a crime. Has it gotten any better?
|
9.3663 | mileage varies | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Thu Jul 20 1995 11:00 | 14 |
| Once agin, West By Gawd Virginee is ahead of the curve...
There, the prevailing law is that once a person comes onto your fenced-in
property you have the right to shoot firsted and ask questions later.
In NC, the law is very dependent on interpretation and the situation.
Like Saw said, it's a better case if'n the guy ends up in your home when
you shoot a_intruder.
However, the law does not support the right to shoot someone who is
trying to steal your car. In a recent case, this was not considered
grounds for self defense.
TTom
|
9.3664 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Thu Jul 20 1995 11:10 | 5 |
| >However, the law does not support the right to shoot someone who is
>trying to steal your car. In a recent case, this was not considered
>grounds for self defense.
Can you shoot someone who scraped your car and didn't leave a note? :-) :-)
|
9.3665 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 11:13 | 30 |
| >However, the law does not support the right to shoot someone who is
>trying to steal your car. In a recent case, this was not considered
>grounds for self defense.
Depends on if they're armed up here. If'n they pull a gun on you (like in
a carjacking let's say) then you can shoot if you dare.
You do have to be very careful though.
My brother worked with a guy who was home sleeping during the day (was working
the mid-shift) and he heard "something" at his front door.
Went downstairs with his gun to see what it was, came around the corner just
as this intruder, with a partner following behind, burst through the front
door which he had pried with a crowbar.
The guy fired at the intruder, and killed him daid instantly. The partner
started to take off down the walk (at which point, my brother's friend couldn't
have shot him) but the intruder-partner was stupid enough to stop, turn around,
draw his gun and aim back at my brother's friend.
That, as they say, was that. Scratch one intruder-partner.
It took the cops about eight hours to determine that the whole thing was
justified.
'Saw
|
9.3666 | semi beastly concealement | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Thu Jul 20 1995 11:25 | 14 |
| >Depends on if they're armed up here. If'n they pull a gun on you (like in
>a carjacking let's say) then you can shoot if you dare.
The local case wasn't this situation but I would think that if'n someone
pulls a gun on you you should be able to resist if'n you so choose.
NC just passed a concealed weapon law but it won't start until December.
I'm gonna get me a permit, fer sure. Right now it's against the law to
keep a gun under the seat or unlocked in the glove box. It is legal to
have it in clear view on your dash but I've heard tell of hassles that
ensue when it's blatant, including being stopped by uniform personnel and
asked why you have a gun out.
TTom
|
9.3667 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 11:28 | 19 |
| >NC just passed a concealed weapon law but it won't start until December.
>I'm gonna get me a permit, fer sure. Right now it's against the law to
>keep a gun under the seat or unlocked in the glove box. It is legal to
>have it in clear view on your dash but I've heard tell of hassles that
>ensue when it's blatant, including being stopped by uniform personnel and
>asked why you have a gun out.
Up here, to have a pistol outside of your home (and that means your yard
even) you have to have a permit to carry, and the gun MUST be concealed.
If you have a permit, it can be in your car, anywhere or anyhow you want,
but concealed.
In a practical sense, it is recommended that if the gun is in your car it is
either in a case/range-bag, or on your person. The cops don't take too kindly
to finding them under the seat, even if you DO have a permit to carry.
'Saw
|
9.3668 | whattabout? | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Thu Jul 20 1995 11:35 | 8 |
| Saw,
This leads to something that I've always been curious about.
Suppose I take one of my guns and lock it in my trunk. That's legal in
NC. Then I cruise up to CT, am I now breaking their state law?
TTom
|
9.3669 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jul 20 1995 11:52 | 4 |
| And the minute you cross the Mass border you're in deep dodo. Then
again, I haven't kept up with any possible changes in Mass but at one
time having a weapon in the car without all the pertinent documentation
was an automatic jail sentence.
|
9.3670 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 11:55 | 27 |
| >This leads to something that I've always been curious about.
>
>Suppose I take one of my guns and lock it in my trunk. That's legal in
>NC. Then I cruise up to CT, am I now breaking their state law?
First off, depends on if it's a long gun or a handgun. In CT long guns may be
transported in your car, and no permit is necessary for owning/carrying.
Your best bet would be to contact all the States involved in your trip and find
out what the requirements are for each state.
If you were passing through CT, the law would be different than if you were
coming up to stay for a bit, and it would be a different thing if you were
bringing the gun to either hunt or shoot in a tournament, or if you were
carrying it for personal protection.
Be really careful of Massachusetts. They have wicked strict gun laws and you
really do need to contact them. I may be wrong, but if I'm going to NH with
a rifle to hunt, let's say, I need some sort of temporary permit or something
to pass through Mass. Again, I could be misinformed however.
'Saw
|
9.3671 | will take heed | HBAHBA::HAAS | time compressed | Thu Jul 20 1995 12:04 | 11 |
| Thanks for the info on Mass and the tip to contact the states.
I'm talking about handguns, here. Unloaded rifles are legal about anyway
you do it, including the ol' pick up gun racks method of display.
It sounds like I just plain shouldn't take a hand gun into Mass.
Hey you 2nd amendementers, how did this abridgement happen? Where was/is
the NRA in Mass?
TTom
|
9.3672 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Thu Jul 20 1995 12:14 | 8 |
| >Hey you 2nd amendementers, how did this abridgement happen? Where was/is
>the NRA in Mass?
They're all up at the NASCAR races in Loudon, NH.
HTH. :-) :-) :-)
Roland
|
9.3673 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 12:18 | 33 |
| >
>It sounds like I just plain shouldn't take a hand gun into Mass.
>
Unless you have a Mass permit.
I've been told by someone who has one (a CT resident) that once you get your
permit for the state you live it, it is not that difficult to get a Mass
permit.
You apply, making sure to note your permit #, and you pay the fee. I'm not
sure how much more difficult it is.
The hardest permits to get are New York City (ferget it) and New York in
general.
And again, there are different rules if you're going to be shooting
competitively, I believe.
In fact, whilst I've been thinking about it, I seem to vaguely remember hearing
or reading somewhere that it is okay to transport a handgun through Mass if you
are going to a competition, IF it is unloaded and stored away from the ammo.
But I'd double check that if I were you.
We probably should move this disucssion string to the Hunting/Guns note....
'Saw
|
9.3674 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 12:18 | 12 |
| >
>They're all up at the NASCAR races in Loudon, NH.
>
Been there, done that.
Actually, the crowd at the races that weekend isn't as "wild" as the crowd for
the motorcycle races on Father's Day....
'Saw
|
9.3675 | | MTWAIN::BURROWS | Volkl: Smoke'm if you got'm. | Thu Jul 20 1995 12:49 | 25 |
| <<< Note 9.3671 by HBAHBA::HAAS "time compressed" >>>
-< will take heed >-
>>>I'm talking about handguns, here. Unloaded rifles are legal about anyway
>>>you do it, including the ol' pick up gun racks method of display.
Bzzzzt. Wrong for MA. Go directly to jail.
Here in good ole MA (you remember the Lexington & Concord) you need a
Firearms Identification Card (FID) to have a rifle or handgun ANYWHERE,
including your house. You need a License to Carry (LTC), as well as the
FID card to have a handgun anywhere outside your house.
Penalty for posession of any firearm without an FID card is a "mandatory" one
year jail sentence. I don't know the penalty for having a handgun without the
LTC, even though you may have an FID.
I don't know how this applies to non-resident travelers.
If you think this is complicated, you should see the &%$$##?!! you have to
go through (includes classes, etc. and arbitrary approval of your local police
chief) to get either of these.
CBB
|
9.3676 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Thu Jul 20 1995 12:51 | 3 |
|
Don't look now but somebody substituted the 'Gun Nut" note for
the NFL one.
|
9.3677 | | ONOFRE::MAY_BR | Mich fightsong=1bourbon,1scotch &1beer | Thu Jul 20 1995 13:39 | 5 |
|
Maybe we could talk about the Blades brothers and tie it all together.
8^)
brews
|
9.3678 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 13:59 | 31 |
| | -< will take heed >-
|
|>>>I'm talking about handguns, here. Unloaded rifles are legal about anyway
|>>>you do it, including the ol' pick up gun racks method of display.
|
|Bzzzzt. Wrong for MA. Go directly to jail.
|
|Here in good ole MA (you remember the Lexington & Concord) you need a
|Firearms Identification Card (FID) to have a rifle or handgun ANYWHERE,
|including your house. You need a License to Carry (LTC), as well as the
|FID card to have a handgun anywhere outside your house.
|
|Penalty for posession of any firearm without an FID card is a "mandatory" one
|year jail sentence. I don't know the penalty for having a handgun without the
|LTC, even though you may have an FID.
|
|I don't know how this applies to non-resident travelers.
|
|If you think this is complicated, you should see the &%$$##?!! you have to
|go through (includes classes, etc. and arbitrary approval of your local police
|chief) to get either of these.
|
|CBB
Moving this over to the hunting note. I'll reply there....
'Saw
|
9.3679 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 14:22 | 8 |
| Heard on the radio whilst I was out at lunch that the Jets signed that guy from
the Steelers, Carlton Hasslerig.
Wasn't he the one with all the problems who left camp last year and never came
back?
'Saw
|
9.3680 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm DTN: 422-7253 | Thu Jul 20 1995 14:25 | 7 |
| >> Heard on the radio whilst I was out at lunch that the Jets signed that guy from
>> the Steelers, Carlton Hasslerig.
>> Wasn't he the one with all the problems who left camp last year and never came
>> back?
He's the one.
|
9.3681 | | CAMONE::WAY | Software Mortician | Thu Jul 20 1995 14:30 | 5 |
| > He's the one.
Then we know the Jets aren't going to win the Super Bowl any time soon. 8^)
|
9.3682 | Andersen's in Atlanta | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Reasonable summer rates | Fri Jul 21 1995 09:56 | 10 |
| Falcons pick up K Morten Anderson, who was waived Wednesday by the
Saints. He got a signing bonus of $750,00, and a three year contract
with base salaries of $500K, $550K, and $600K.
Morten has kicked 5 game winning field games against the Falcons.
Maybe the Falcons will go 6 - 10 now. Gotta love that chuck n duck
offense.
UMDan
|
9.3683 | Is a bonus a bonus? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jul 21 1995 13:04 | 4 |
| Does the player have the bonus as his or can he be cut later and not
get it all. Can Morten spend the 750k on a home and miss the next 20
and still keep it? Likewise of course I'm curious about Bledsoe's
10-11 million "bonus".
|
9.3684 | bonus = guarenteed money | CSLALL::BRULE | Was there life before ESPN? | Fri Jul 21 1995 13:21 | 6 |
| 95% of the time an NFL "bonus" is the only guarenteed money a player
will get. So yes Morten can go blow the 750k -taxes even if he falls
off a bridge tomorrow. NFL players get paid week to week so if they get
cut after the 8th game there out half of their salary.
Mike
|
9.3685 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Watch out Big Brother's watching! | Fri Jul 21 1995 13:46 | 8 |
|
yup same with Bledsoe. Of course He'll probably cash in on it all but
only the bonus is guarenteed.......Of the bonus he gave a million
to the macaroni and cheese guy's foundation and is startin his own
foundation with another million. At this rate he's going to be
bigger than Bird around these parts.........
mike
|
9.3686 | Bird has no equal in Boston sports. | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jul 21 1995 14:39 | 5 |
| > At this rate he's going to be
> bigger than Bird around these parts.........
Careful there Mikey....he ain't won nothin' yet. And if he does, he'll
have to do it a few times before we put him "up there".
|
9.3687 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Watch out Big Brother's watching! | Fri Jul 21 1995 16:16 | 5 |
|
I doubt it Joe. I think the popularity of football and his charity
work (of which Bird did little if any) will put him over the top......
mike
|
9.3688 | better take Sanders | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Aug 07 1995 14:38 | 5 |
|
I see the Raiders punched out the Cowboys lights on and off the
field this week. Cancel the party Tommy...........
mike
|
9.3689 | 2 suspended for drugs | HBAHBA::HAAS | wake & bake | Fri Aug 11 1995 14:55 | 12 |
| Sign of the times.
What do the Arizona Cardinals and Cleveland Browns have in common? No not
that 'has XXX won YYY' thang.
They both employ drug users!
The NFL has suspended LB Jamir Miller of the Cardinals and DE Larry
Webster of the Browns. Miller got a 4 week vacation while Webster gets to
sit out 6 weeks.
TTom
|
9.3690 | | WMGEN1::16.135.176.77::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Fri Aug 11 1995 15:18 | 9 |
|
Cards are waiting for the shoe to drop on Chuck Levy too. He's suing the
NFL, so they are taking their time before they announce anything, but he's as
dirty as a Yankee.
It's a good thing butty traded the #1 this year, look at how well the
geennius did last year, 1st and 2nd rounder both a couple of druggies.
boC
|
9.3691 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Aug 11 1995 15:52 | 9 |
| Anyone else hear the report about how most NFL players are either hooked on
or at least using sodium chloride? From what I hear it's the new white powder
of choice for many athletes and is even found sitting out in the open in many
areas frequented by NFL players.
Question is, what's going to happen to our youth once word of this gets out?
Is our civilization doomed?
George
|
9.3692 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Aug 11 1995 15:56 | 2 |
9.3693 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Fri Aug 11 1995 15:56 | 4 |
|
Could be; high blood pressure can be a real killer...
Joe
|
9.3694 | nomo HHH in Metrodome; for sale | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Wed Aug 16 1995 14:14 | 13 |
| pouring salt on old wounds ...
I've found a possible MrT sighting!
Seems that everything up his way is going down the crapper. The Metrodome
is going broke so they're gonna take off Hubert H. Humphrey's name.
They're then gonna try to sell the name to a corporate sponsor, asking
$1 million per year.
It's either MrT or some conspiracy by the lunatic rights to slur the name
of a venerable liberal.
TTom
|
9.3695 | My favorite HHH memory | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | How can people live in Florida? | Wed Aug 16 1995 16:39 | 6 |
| I'll never forget the time we booed him off the stage at UMass in 1968
when he refused to answer questions about how he would handle ending
the war in Vietnam. Didn't want to discuss Vietnam, so us students
weren't interested in anything else he had to say.
NAZZ
|
9.3696 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Aug 16 1995 17:39 | 3 |
| Of course no one else had an answer that anyone wanted to hear either.
George
|
9.3697 | Carter out | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Reasonable summer rates | Fri Aug 18 1995 15:35 | 5 |
| Just heard on the news that Ki-Jana Carter tore his ACL in
last nights game and is lost for the season.
UMDan
|
9.3698 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | CLEVELAND INDIANS=BATTING POWER | Fri Aug 18 1995 16:27 | 4 |
|
Try one or two weeks pal...
WOOF!
|
9.3699 | Better livin' through chemistry | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Reasonable summer rates | Fri Aug 18 1995 17:46 | 5 |
| Don't be so sure. Another update says he has a torn ACL. But since he
signed a $27M dollar contract they can just shoot him up and he'll be
back next week:-)
UMDan
|
9.3700 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Fri Aug 18 1995 17:50 | 6 |
|
Just heard on the radio that the team says he's probably out for the
season. Klingler broke his jaw too.
Kevin
|
9.3701 | Anybody tune in to last nights game with the boys | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Aug 22 1995 14:00 | 1 |
| So how did Dallas - Denver make out last night?
|
9.3702 | According to Sportscenter | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | How can people live in Florida? | Tue Aug 22 1995 14:40 | 3 |
| Denver wins 20-17. Late field goal.
NAZZ
|
9.3703 | some waivings | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Wed Aug 23 1995 13:53 | 19 |
| More news from the Turk.
Amongst those waived:
o Chuck Cecil, resident kamikaze haid tackler; by Cleveburgh
o Bucky Brooks, ex-Tar Heel, of interest to Panthers; by Buffalo
o Kirby Dar Dar, one of the bestest lasted names ever; by Miami
Amonst those not waived:
o Derrike Kennard, who retired but Jones won't accept it; by Dallas
Meanwhile, it wasn't clear if'n Donks Dan Williams is coming of going.
Willliams, DE, was arrested on domestic violence charges.
Similarly, the Oilers aren't talking whether they've waived the turf on
their field, still a subject or review by the league.
TTom
|
9.3704 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Wed Aug 23 1995 13:54 | 4 |
| > o Bucky Brooks, ex-Tar Heel, of interest to Panthers; by Buffalo
Doc's brother? Or Doc in disguise?
|
9.3705 | a real Tar Heel | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Wed Aug 23 1995 13:58 | 5 |
| Naw, aint no Doc 00:00:00 and shore aint no Ack, neither, too.
Brooks showed some good promise and he could make the Panthers easy.
TTom
|
9.3706 | gee, I'm shocked | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Aug 23 1995 16:31 | 1 |
9.3707 | Entire schedule ? | FRSBEE::GROVES | | Fri Aug 25 1995 08:22 | 5 |
|
Does anyone know where I can get the entire 95-96 NFL schedule from
NOTES ?
Jim
|
9.3708 | something like this | HBAHBA::HAAS | x,y,z,time,matter,energy | Fri Aug 25 1995 11:19 | 339 |
| *All Times Eastern
*WEEK 1
*Sunday, Sept. 3
Cincinnati at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at New England, 1 p.m.
Houston at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Carolina at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at Miami, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Arizona at Washington, 4 p.m.
Minnesota at Chicago, 4 p.m.
Buffalo at Denver, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Sept. 4
Dallas at New York Giants, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 2
*Sunday, Sept. 10
Miami at New England, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles at Washington, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Houston, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Carolina at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
New York Giants at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
Denver at Dallas, 4 p.m.
Indianapolis at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
Seattle at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Jacksonville at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
Atlanta at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Philadelphia at Arizona, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Sept. 11
Green Bay at Chicago, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 3
*Sunday, Sept. 17
San Diego at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Houston, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Carolina, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Arizona at Detroit, 1 p.m.
New York Giants at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
New England at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Cincinnati at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Jacksonville at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
Washington at Denver, 4 p.m.
Chicago at Tampa Bay, 4 p.m.
Dallas at Minnesota, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Sept. 18
Pittsburgh at Miami, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 4
Open date: Buffalo, Carolina, Indianapolis, Miami, New England, Seattle
*Sunday, Sept. 24
Chicago at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Washington at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at Atlanta, 4 p.m.
Denver at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Houston at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at Cleveland, 4 p.m.
Arizona at Dallas, 4 p.m.
Philadelphia at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
Green Bay at Jacksonville, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Sept. 25
San Francisco at Detroit, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 5
Open date: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota
*Sunday, Oct. 1
New England at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Miami at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Carolina, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Dallas at Washington, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Jacksonville at Houston, 4 p.m.
Denver at Seattle, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Pittsburgh, 4 p.m.
New York Giants at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Los Angeles at New York Jets, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 2
Buffalo at Cleveland, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 6
Open date: Atlanta, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco
*Sunday, Oct. 8
Cincinnati at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Dallas, 1 p.m.
Washington at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Carolina at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Houston at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Detroit, 4 p.m.
Indianapolis at Miami, 4 p.m.
Seattle at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
Arizona at New York Giants, 4 p.m.
Denver at New England, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 9
San Diego at Kansas City, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 7
Open date: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Pittsburgh
*Thursday, Oct. 12
Atlanta at St. Louis, 8 p.m.
*Sunday, Oct. 15
Seattle at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
New England at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Chicago at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Miami at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
New York Jets at Carolina, 4 p.m.
Washington at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Dallas at San Diego, 4 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 16
Los Angeles at Denver, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 8
Open date: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia
*Thursday, Oct. 19
Cincinnati at Pittsburgh, 8 p.m.
*Sunday, Oct. 22
Houston at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Miami at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
Jacksonville at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at Carolina, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Washington, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at Denver, 4 p.m.
Indianapolis at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Seattle, 4 p.m.
San Francisco at St. Louis, 4 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 23
Buffalo at New England, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 9
Open date: Denver, Kansas City, Los Angeles, San Diego
*Sunday, Oct. 29
Jacksonville at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Dallas at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Carolina at New England, 1 p.m.
Buffalo at Miami, 4 p.m.
Seattle at Arizona, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Houston, 4 p.m.
New York Giants at Washington, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Oct. 30
Chicago at Minnesota, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 10
Open date: Jacksonville, Tampa Bay
*Sunday, Nov. 5
Buffalo at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
New England at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
Houston at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Washington at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Chicago, 4 p.m.
Los Angeles at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
Carolina at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Arizona at Denver, 4 p.m.
New York Giants at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Miami at San Diego, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Nov. 6
Philadelphia at Dallas, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 11
Open date: New York Jets, Washington
*Sunday, Nov. 12
Indianapolis at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Los Angeles at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
New England at Miami, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Houston, 1 p.m.
Seattle at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Carolina at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Chicago at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at San Diego, 4 p.m.
San Francisco at Dallas, 4 p.m.
Minnesota at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Denver at Philadelphia, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Nov. 13
Cleveland at Pittsburgh, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 12
*Sunday, Nov. 19
Seattle at Washington, 1 p.m.
Jacksonville at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at New England, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Arizona at Carolina, 1 p.m.
New York Giants at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
San Diego at Denver, 4 p.m.
Buffalo at New York Jets, 4 p.m.
Dallas at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at Minnesota, 4 p.m.
Houston at Kansas City, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Nov. 20
San Francisco at Miami, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 13
*Thursday, Nov. 23
Minnesota at Detroit, 12:30 p.m.
Kansas City at Dallas, 4 p.m.
*Sunday, Nov. 26
Miami at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
New England at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Chicago at New York Giants, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Washington, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Denver at Houston, 4 p.m.
New York Jets at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Cleveland, 4 p.m.
St. Louis at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Atlanta at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Carolina at New Orleans, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Nov. 27
Los Angeles at San Diego, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 14
*Thursday, Nov. 30
New York Giants at Arizona, 8 p.m.
*Sunday, Dec. 3
Indianapolis at Carolina, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Houston at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Miami, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at New England, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Jacksonville at Denver, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
Cleveland at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Washington at Dallas, 4 p.m.
Philadelphia at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Buffalo at San Francisco, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Dec. 4
Chicago at Detroit, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 15
*Saturday, Dec. 9
Cleveland at Minnesota, 12:30 p.m.
Arizona at San Diego, 4 p.m.
*Sunday, Dec. 10
Buffalo at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at New England, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Carolina, 1 p.m.
Dallas at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Chicago at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Houston, 1 p.m.
Seattle at Denver, 4 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
Washington at New York Giants, 4 p.m.
Green Bay at Tampa Bay, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Dec. 11
Kansas City at Miami, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 16
*Saturday, Dec. 16
New England at Pittsburgh, 12:30 p.m.
Green Bay at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
*Sunday, Dec. 17
Jacksonville at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Miami at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Cleveland, 1 p.m.
New York Jets at Houston, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Carolina, 1 p.m.
Arizona at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Washington at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
Denver at Kansas City, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Indianapolis, 4 p.m.
New York Giants at Dallas, 4 p.m.
Los Angeles at Seattle, 8 p.m.
*Monday, Dec. 18
Minnesota at San Francisco, 9 p.m.
------
*WEEK 17
*Saturday, Dec. 23
San Diego at New York Giants, 12:30 p.m.
Detroit at Tampa Bay, 4 p.m.
New England at Indianapolis, 8 p.m.
*Sunday, Dec. 24
Pittsburgh at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Houston at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Seattle at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Cleveland at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Chicago, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at New York Jets, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Carolina at Washington, 4 p.m.
Denver at Los Angeles, 4 p.m.
Miami at St. Louis, 4 p.m.
*Monday, Dec. 25
Dallas at Arizona, 9 p.m.
------
*Playoffs
*Saturday, Dec. 30
AFC and NFC Wild Cards
*Sunday, Dec. 31
AFC and NFC Wild Cards
*Saturday, Jan. 6
AFC and NFC Divisional Playoffs
*Sunday, Jan. 7
AFC and NFC Divisional Playoffs
*Sunday, Jan. 14
AFC and NFC Championships
*Sunday, Jan. 28
Super Bowl at Tempe, Ariz.
*Sunday, Feb. 4
Pro Bowl at Honolulu
|
9.3709 | Comments from Atlanta | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Give it to the kid! | Mon Aug 28 1995 16:21 | 20 |
| Couple of comments from Len Pasquarelli regarding teams this year -
Patriots - "Chic pick by bandwagon-jumpers, but Bill Parcell's club
still looks to be a year away"
Cleveland - "Nasty team with an attitude, but is this a club with a
Super bowl-caliber quaterback?"
Pittsburgh - "Best defense in league by far. Will benefit from addition
of former Falcons PK Norm Johnson."
Giants - "Most important ex-Georgian in Big Apple isn't Herschel
Walker, but Dan Reeves."
Cardinals - "All Buddy Ryan needs is a little offense, and that's
probably all he's got, too."
UMDan
Washington - "With Heath Shuler still clueless, patience of Jack Kent
Cooke will be severely tested."
|
9.3710 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Aug 28 1995 16:53 | 7 |
9.3711 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Tue Aug 29 1995 09:56 | 11 |
| Giants o-line is banged up, and they have no pass rush. Other than that....
Actually, if the o-line was healthy, I'd feel more comfortable about the
upcoming season. Dave Brown is improving, and his work with DeBerg is
definitely paying off.
But if we don't have a decent d-line, then the Giants will get manhandled.
I'm thinking the Cowboys will do just that next Monday night.
'Saw
|
9.3712 | Foster release confirmed? | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Aug 29 1995 10:48 | 8 |
| Any confirmation on the Panthers releasing Foster?
He's one talented individual. I'm sure he'll be picked up right away.
billl
|
9.3713 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Where is the grass greener? | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:06 | 12 |
|
Yes, Barry Foster was released by the Panthers. The Panthers are
concerned with his past injuries. Also his lack of production this
pre-season. He only gained ~69 yrds. His left ankle and right knee
are bothering him. This is surprising because the expansion teams can
have 56 players on there rosters. Three more then the rest of the
league.
Don't know how quick he will be picked up. Teams just cut down to
53 players. If they claim him off of waivers. They have to honor his
contract and fit him under the salary cap.
Ron
|
9.3714 | Barry - agile but fragile | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:08 | 12 |
|
>> Any confirmation on the Panthers releasing Foster?
Yup. It's in today's Globe. Barry hadn't put in a full week
of practice due to nagging injuries. I'm sure Jake is just
crushed to hear that Barry's out of a job.
PS - I'm sure Barry's release will hit the New Hampshire papers
shortly after you guys get the news about the troubles in
Bosnia.
|
9.3715 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:23 | 16 |
| > PS - I'm sure Barry's release will hit the New Hampshire papers
> shortly after you guys get the news about the troubles in
> Bosnia.
Let's see - you live in greater metro Clinton, don't you? I'm sure the local
paper had a stringer at the Carolina Panther camp. Up here (Nashua), the
Telegraph gets us more complete sports news than that day's Globe (though we
do miss out on the "brilliance" of Dan Shaughnessy). So try to relax a little
on the cheap shots.
Given the state of the Pats running game, do they have enough under the salary
cap to try and get Foster? We've already got Meggett for a 3rd-down back and
a rookie in Curtis Martin who can play on 1st down. Barry would only have to
play on 2nd down... :-)
Roland
|
9.3716 | ;^) | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:26 | 9 |
|
> PS - I'm sure Barry's release will hit the New Hampshire papers
> shortly after you guys get the news about the troubles in
> Bosnia.
Bonsia???
billl
|
9.3717 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:30 | 3 |
| > Bonsia???
Are those the little trees you're supposed to keep trimming down?
|
9.3718 | Foster outta here | HBAHBA::HAAS | lifepath perturbance | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:31 | 30 |
| Foster be gone.
Officially, this move was made because of concern for his injuries and
his failure to produce. Unofficially, barely, Foster was waived because
of his his attitude and his work ethic, or more precisely, his lack
therein.
Capers after giving Foster every chance eventually got tired of his
crying and whining. Capers insulated Foster from every pressure. He
defended him in front of the press who were noting his lack of effort
in practice. The final straw was lasted game against the Giants. Foster
was medically clear to compete but refused to play.
The local rag's headline says it all:
Foster just doesn't cut it
Capers stated that one of the problems that Foster was causing with his
high salary and no effort was that some of the other veterans, who are
being payed less that Fosters' 2.5+ mil, were really busting their ass to
both get in shape, learn the system and lend a helping hand to this young
and inexperienced team.
So, it looks like running back by committee. Randy Baldwin is expected to
get more carries. Derek Moore has come over from Detroit and he'll
probably see some action, if'n the Panthers can get close to the goal
line. The right side of the line has 2 rookies and the mainstay of the
left has gonde down. This aint exactly the kinda help they need.
TTom
|
9.3719 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:32 | 6 |
| So what's happening in Bosnia? Someone try to hit the ArchDuke again?
Telegraph may have some west coast action when Glove doesn't but I like
to read some writing once in awhile - btw like Ryans "Patriots A-Z" the
other day but that's an easy one, Pats factual history is wierder than
any fiction and apparently only half of it has ever been told.
|
9.3720 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 11:37 | 8 |
| > Telegraph may have some west coast action when Glove doesn't but I like
> to read some writing once in awhile
True, but I didn't go to BC, so there's usually not much for me to read in
the Globe other than Bob Ryan... :-)
Actually, I owe Tommy Brydie an apology for the knee-jerk reaction - I just
get sick and tired of New Hampshire getting dumped on.
|
9.3721 | From the White mtns to the cornfields | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:01 | 16 |
| Roland you must be new to New Hampshire, nobody up here cares what
Mass-folks think even though half are from there. The natives who go
back a few generations have never been there or have spent much more
time in Canada than Mass.
And for the Glove, just remember Shaugnassy(sic) is from HolyCross but
a whole slew of them are from BC not to speak of a whole lot of other
writers. In fact I just saw in Zylers a history of the ncaa which tho
interesting was way overpriced but I bought it anyway since it was
written by another BC alum, Joe Gergen.
Pretty interesting especially the '39-60 part and all the teams that
have at least made the round of 16 (Brown?,Cornell). Only team I can
think of that's never gone that far is ...
N E B R A S K A
|
9.3722 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:02 | 8 |
| Mr Duprez,
As long as it's coming from The Peoples Republic of Mass, who cares.
billl
|
9.3723 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:08 | 5 |
| > Mr Duprez,
Wow. *No one* calls me Mr...
On the rare occasions when they do, I keep looking around for my dad.
|
9.3724 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:09 | 4 |
| > As long as it's coming from The Peoples Republic of Mass, who cares.
I try and avoid the cheap shots in the other direction, too, hence my apology
for "greater metro Clinton"...
|
9.3725 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:21 | 4 |
| If someone hit the Archduke again, then I'm in serious trouble.
I haven't qualified with the Springfield '03. Isn't that the firearm that's
required when the Archduke gets hit?
|
9.3726 | a real sport | HBAHBA::HAAS | lifepath perturbance | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:23 | 8 |
| So far we got politics, religion and guns.
Can twinkies and woodies be very far away...
And oh by the way, y'all can quit pretending you like baseball cause
football is here. MLB can go into hiding again.
TTom
|
9.3727 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:25 | 12 |
| >
>Can twinkies and woodies be very far away...
>
Well, twinkies are good when you're at the range trying to qualify with t
the '03. To increase their ability to "stick to your ribs" smear a little
cheez-whiz on the twinkie...
'Saw
|
9.3728 | amateurs | HBAHBA::HAAS | lifepath perturbance | Tue Aug 29 1995 12:56 | 9 |
| I hear you can use a bit of the inside twinkie stuff to mark the end of
the barrell which helps ya aim and it's better'n spit a la Alvin York.
Dint he use a_'03?
And speaking of guns, this should be the lasted year in the NFL for the
run and shoot. Leave that to the college folks, dontcha know.
TTom
|
9.3729 | | CAMONE::WAY | Pick 'em up and strut | Tue Aug 29 1995 13:06 | 7 |
| >
>Dint he use a_'03?
>
Yep.
Alvin York, now there was a man's man.....
|
9.3730 | best oxymoron I've seen in years | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Aug 29 1995 13:35 | 1 |
9.3731 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Aug 30 1995 11:45 | 8 |
|
Does anyone know what the job functions of either an Offensive or
Defensive Quality Control Coach are?????????
Do they make sure there's plenty of gatorde? Or maybe take the
pictures of the opponent's sets????
mike
|
9.3732 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Wed Aug 30 1995 11:52 | 6 |
| >
> Does anyone know what the job functions of either an Offensive or
> Defensive Quality Control Coach are?????????
>
That's a new one on me......
|
9.3733 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Wed Aug 30 1995 12:48 | 9 |
| >
> Does anyone know what the job functions of either an Offensive or
> Defensive Quality Control Coach are?????????
>
Those are the guys who are in charge of implementing 6 Sigma for their
respective teams.
Keith
|
9.3734 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Aug 30 1995 13:03 | 1 |
9.3735 | Strength of Schedule Chart | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Thu Aug 31 1995 09:33 | 49 |
| In case anyone is interested, here's a strength of schedule chart,
provided to me from EPSNet via my good man Dave 'Pistol' Parker from
Giants notes.
================================================================================
Note 264.5 The official 1995 season prognostication note!!!! 5 of 12
UNXA::PARKER "NJ Devils: 94-95 Stanley Cup champs!" 43 lines 29-AUG-1995 13:35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<snip>
For the record, it's the 7th.
From ESPNet:
TEAM OPPONENTS' 1994 GAMES VS GAMES VS
WIN PCT. AND RECORD +.500 TEAMS PLAYOFF TEAMS
San Diego .543 139-117 9 6
New England .533 128-112 6 6
Green Bay .525 126-114 10 9
Minnesota .523 134-122 10 10
Cincinnati .522 117-107 9 8
New Orleans .522 117-107 7 6
NY Giants .520 133-123 8 7
Atlanta .518 116-108 6 6
Detroit .517 124-116 9 9
Houston .513 115-109 8 8
Kansas City .512 131-125 9 6
Washington .508 122-118 7 4
Arizona .504 121-119 8 6
Dallas .504 129-127 8 5
Indianapolis .504 113-111 7 6
St. Louis .504 113-111 5 5
Miami .500 128-128 6 6
Denver .496 119-121 8 6
San Francisco .496 111-113 6 5
Buffalo .492 118-122 6 6
Oakland .492 126-130 7 6
Pittsburgh .487 109-115 10 9
Philadelphia .481 123-133 7 4
Seattle .479 115-125 7 4
Chicago .469 105-119 8 7
Cleveland .469 105-119 8 8
NY Jets .469 105-119 5 4
Carolina .465 119-137 4 4
Tampa Bay .457 107-117 9 9
Jacksonville .453 116-140 7 7
|
9.3736 | SF isn't much better | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Aug 31 1995 15:41 | 1 |
9.3737 | MNF has the ratings slot wrapped, so go new format.... | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Tue Sep 05 1995 15:04 | 43 |
| I watched the Giants last night get demolished by the Cowboys, and I've
put my remarks in about that in here already.
But you know, as I was watching the game I couldn't help but think it's
time for a change on ABC's Monday Night Football.
Frank Gifford has been in the booth for 25 years, and last night he sounded
every bit like he definitely had. As Imus would say, "pin his name and
address on his windbreaker and send him out to the dog track."
I was reminded slightly of President Reagan's later years when there would
be these almost imperceptible gaps, wherein you could hear the gears of his
brain grinding while it tried to find something, anything, to say.
Dan Dierdork, well, I mean, his little vignette on his former teammates who
write with large crayons was so enlightening, and even Al Michaels stumbled all
over the place last night.
Other highlights include them asking Frank to have Kathy Lee bring up the
Notre Dame loss to egRegis on their show, then inexplicably dropping this
little "she owes us one" and having about five seconds of dead air follow
that. Like any of the us viewers knew what the hell they were talking about.
Or the wonderful englightening remarks about "Well, it's September, it must
be a 'possum huntin' moon," followed up by Frank witty rejoinder "in this area
they have a hard time crossing the street."
Fellows, it just ain't happening.....
I'm almost of the mind that they should can all three, and go to a two
man crew -- almost any two would be better than these three. Hell, you
could put Dan Jiggets in there and he'd be more on the ball than Dan Dierdork.
Go to a two man crew. Years ago folks might have tuned in now for the
witty repartee of Dan, Frank and Howard, but nowadays, there's not closely
resembling wit coming out of the booth. What we're getting is more like
something that rhymes with "wit."
'Saw
|
9.3738 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 05 1995 15:15 | 9 |
| How quickly they forget ... what it was like ... to listen to the ponderings
... of the announcer ... who worked ... with Frank Gifford ... so many years
ago.
One can only think back ... to the gaps ... between the words ... of which
there were so many ... so unrelated ... to the proceedings taking place ...
on the field.
George
|
9.3739 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Tue Sep 05 1995 15:30 | 17 |
| | How quickly they forget ... what it was like ... to listen to the ponderings
|... of the announcer ... who worked ... with Frank Gifford ... so many years
|ago.
|
| One can only think back ... to the gaps ... between the words ... of which
|there were so many ... so unrelated ... to the proceedings taking place ...
|on the field.
I'm not forgetting. Listening to Howard fumble and stumble and ramble
was interesting, because he could really dig himself a hole, and every once
in a while he'd dig so deep he'd actually dig himself OUT of the hole.
And for all his foibles, he was an intelligent man.
This crew right now just doesn't get it done....
'Saw
|
9.3740 | Turn out the lights | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Tue Sep 05 1995 15:35 | 3 |
|
Look on the bright side, It could be Brent Musberger, Dierdork, and
Hank Stram!!
|
9.3741 | Whoa Nellie | AD::HEATH | New England Patriots 1996 Super Bowl Champs | Tue Sep 05 1995 15:41 | 7 |
|
Granted he only does college football now but the best football
announcer I have ever heard still works for ABC. I'd love to see
him in the booth.
Jerry
|
9.3742 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Give it to the kid! | Tue Sep 05 1995 15:42 | 12 |
| I just tuned in for a couple of minutes (Novachek lost the ball at the
goal line), and they were blathering on about what a great coach Reeves
was - "He's right up there with the elite of coaching. What a genius,
etc.". Couldn't help but thinking "How many SB rings is he (Reeves)
wearing? Huh- thought so.".
Maybe one of the local radio stations carries the games so I won't have
to listen to those guys.
Are the Gnats that bad or the 'Boys that good?
UMDan
|
9.3743 | give'm a chance | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Tue Sep 05 1995 16:03 | 8 |
|
Youz still knocking Reeves. This man has taken some pretty poor talent
and turned them into winners in a few years. First game of the year
and people are looking for new coach. They ran into a very hot Cowboy
team last night. Heck they havent beaten the Cowboys when it meant
anything for a few years now. With the talent that he has to work with
why does anyone expect him to do any better.
|
9.3744 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Wed Sep 06 1995 09:19 | 35 |
| > Youz still knocking Reeves. This man has taken some pretty poor talent
> and turned them into winners in a few years. First game of the year
> and people are looking for new coach. They ran into a very hot Cowboy
> team last night. Heck they havent beaten the Cowboys when it meant
> anything for a few years now. With the talent that he has to work with
> why does anyone expect him to do any better.
The Giants ARE that bad, and the Cowboys were that good.
Dan Reeves, in Denver, had a knack for taking poor talent teams, getting
them to over-achieve, mainly with not much defense and an offense that was
pretty decent, and a QB who could pull Dan's butt out of the fire late (a lot).
In New York, Dan Reeves has molded what was once a decent Giants team into
a likeness of the Broncos. Yes, he's business-like and professional, but
so is Marv Levy.
Dan Reeves favors speed over size on defense. Look where it got them Monday
night. The Cowboys couldn't (too often) sweep the Giants, or pull, because
the lateral pursuit was there. But the Cowboys have a brutish, stud line.
Just block straight ahead. Emmitt had a 50 yard wide hole to run through
untouched to the goal line - shoot, he probably thought he was out there
running a wind sprint.
Dan Reeves is a good coach, not a great coach, and I have serious doubts about
his ability to EVER win a Super Bowl, with the Giants or anyone else.
And to be fair, the other half of the problem is George Young, but I don't
even wanna get going on him....
'Saw
|
9.3745 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Wed Sep 06 1995 09:48 | 5 |
| > Yes, he's business-like and professional, but
> so is Marv Levy.
And Marv Levy has taken his team to four Super Bowls, which is a
pretty good coaching job in and of itself...
|
9.3746 | May the best team win [they don't always] | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 06 1995 09:58 | 14 |
| I think you guys are rating going to a Super Bowl just a bit too high. Yes
it's an indication of how good a coach is but it's not everything. There have
been a number of times when the 2nd best team was beat by the best team in the
NFC or AFC Championship game but that doesn't mean that the coach of that team
was any worse than the team from who made it from the other Conference.
And then there are upsets. Some times a really well coached team just has a
bad day in the playoffs and gets eliminated.
Granted in football the better team is more likely to win a game than in
basketball or baseball but still any single game elimination format doesn't
prove who is the better team it only proves which team did better.
George
|
9.3747 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Wed Sep 06 1995 10:21 | 14 |
| Second place is the first loser. Don't ever forget that.
If you're a coach in the NFL you're not out there to "do a good coaching job"
You're selected as a coach because ultimately the ownership of the team
wants you to get them a championship.
Dan Reeves has gotten his teams to overachieve in a lot of instances. That's
a great thing. But there are also certain flaws in Dan Reeves. One is his
philosophy of defense, at least as it applies to what's going on in the
NFC East.
'Saw
|
9.3748 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Wed Sep 06 1995 10:36 | 3 |
| >Second place is the first loser. Don't ever forget that.
Stop stealing slogans from "No Fear" T-shirts!!! :-)
|
9.3749 | I guess I'm in the wrong generation.... | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Wed Sep 06 1995 10:54 | 9 |
| |>Second place is the first loser. Don't ever forget that.
|
|Stop stealing slogans from "No Fear" T-shirts!!! :-)
Oh, is that on a t-shirt? Didn't know that....
My brother has been saying that for about three years now. Maybe that's
where he saw it....
|
9.3750 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 06 1995 11:01 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3747 by CAMONE::WAY "We aim by P.F.M" >>>
>You're selected as a coach because ultimately the ownership of the team
>wants you to get them a championship.
Sure, but just because you don't do that doesn't mean you are a lousy coach,
nor does it mean you can't do it in the future. It may just mean that you were
unlucky, especially with a 1 game elimination format.
Given a choice between a coach that steadily built a winning team over 2 or 3
years then lost a couple close playoff games versus a coach with a losing
record who got the 3rd Wild Card then got to the Super Bowl with a few
obviously lucky wins, I'd go with the 1st coach. His chances of winning in the
future would be much better than the guy who got lucky that one time.
Performance in the playoffs is something but it's not an iron clad indicator
of who's likely to be an effective coach in the future and who is not.
George
|
9.3751 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Wed Sep 06 1995 11:02 | 16 |
| |
| Sure, but just because you don't do that doesn't mean you are a lousy coach,
|nor does it mean you can't do it in the future. It may just mean that you were
|unlucky, especially with a 1 game elimination format.
|
I'm not basing my opinion solely on that.
> Performance in the playoffs is something but it's not an iron clad indicator
>of who's likely to be an effective coach in the future and who is not.
never said it was....
'Saw
|
9.3752 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Wed Sep 06 1995 11:21 | 12 |
|
>> Granted in football the better team is more likely to win a
>> game than in basketball or baseball but still any single game
>> elimination format doesn't prove who is the better team it only
>> proves which team did better.
Completely absurd. You're not talking about the NCAA basketball
tourney where you may not know your next opponent until a day or
two before the game and may not have seen any film of them. Given
the amount of preparation each team has in the NFL and the amount of
film coaches watch - 99% of the time the best prepared team wins. Luck
plays a very small part in it.
|
9.3753 | You too can get rich quick!!! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | NBA action - it's nonexistant | Wed Sep 06 1995 11:32 | 5 |
| Hey 'Saw - I'm thinkin' you outta put out a whole line of t-shirts,
based on stuff people have said in ::SPROTS!!!!! You'd be a
gazillionaire in no time!!!!!
NAZZ
|
9.3754 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Wed Sep 06 1995 11:38 | 2 |
|
Gotta be careful of all the trademarking, though!
|
9.3755 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Wed Sep 06 1995 11:58 | 21 |
| Nazz, it's a great idea, BUT....
These folks in SPORTS whine about everything (myself included).
Could you see it if I put out a shirt with a saying, and nexted
thing you know, everybody and their brother would be saying
"Saw, you got it wrong, I didn't say it like that"....
I'd never have a moment's peace!
But I'll tell you this -- one of these years I'm going to write a book based on
these past bunch o' years in SPROTS. It'll definitely be some sort of satire,
and of course it will have the obligatory disclaimer on the copyright page
about it being a work of fiction and any resemblance to persons living or dead
etc etc etc, but oh what a fun time I'll have....
'aw
|
9.3756 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Give it to the kid! | Wed Sep 06 1995 11:59 | 6 |
| Yeah, we'll all be lining up for that fuscia T-Shirt that says
"YABBUT WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME (enter non-Cleveland team name here)
EVER WON A CHAMPIONSHIP!"
UMDan
|
9.3757 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Wed Sep 06 1995 12:02 | 17 |
| |
| Yeah, we'll all be lining up for that fuscia T-Shirt that says
|
| "YABBUT WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME (enter non-Cleveland team name here)
| EVER WON A CHAMPIONSHIP!"
|
| UMDan
I made the mistake of taking a big drink of water, just before this
note popped up on the screen. I now have enough water in my sinuses to
last a life time.....
8^)
|
9.3758 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Sep 06 1995 12:05 | 8 |
|
Dan Reeves is an over-rated bum. Dan Reeves' record if broken down
would show that he consistently beats up on lesser teams and lost more
often than not to teams of equal talent or better talent. If Dan Reeves
was a good coach he would beat teams better than his own atleast 50% of
the time. Dan Reeves' motivalition skills rival Valium's........
mike
|
9.3759 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Sep 06 1995 12:07 | 8 |
| > -< Whoa Nellie >-
> Granted he only does college football now but the best football
> announcer I have ever heard still works for ABC. I'd love to see
> him in the booth.
He did MNF in the beginning and failed. His "shtick" doesn't cut it on
NFL games. MNF requires color from the announcing team. It's more than
a game, and I agree with 'Saw, this crew has had it.
|
9.3760 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 06 1995 12:11 | 26 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3752 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!" >>>
> Completely absurd. You're not talking about the NCAA basketball
> tourney where you may not know your next opponent until a day or
> two before the game and may not have seen any film of them. Given
> the amount of preparation each team has in the NFL and the amount of
> film coaches watch - 99% of the time the best prepared team wins. Luck
> plays a very small part in it.
Great Tommy, at least you are now admitting that the NCAA tourney is no
indicator of who's the best team. That's a big change from your claim a year
or so ago about how it was the greatest thing around.
So if someone wins an AFC or NFC championship by 1 point because the 48 yard
field goal they kicked with 2 seconds remaining hooked but just squeaked inside
the goal post then there is no luck at all involved in that win?
I suppose they planned everything including the gust of wind that died just
before the ball crossed the bar that would have forced the ball to go wide if
they had kicked it 3 seconds earlier?
Right, no luck at all. ATC systems struggle trying to figure out when wind
sheer will cause a 737 to crash but football coaches have every gust of wind
planed a week in advance. No luck involved at all.
George
|
9.3761 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Sep 06 1995 12:51 | 4 |
9.3762 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Wed Sep 06 1995 13:21 | 25 |
|
>> Great Tommy, at least you are now admitting that the NCAA tourney
>> is no indicator of who's the best team. That's a big change from your
>> claim a year or so ago about how it was the greatest thing around.
It is still the best event in all of sports. The fact that a Cinderella
team can knock off a national power (see UCSB vs. Arizona) is one of
the things that make it great, George. Unpredictability. The NFL is
anything but.
>> Right, no luck at all. ATC systems struggle trying to figure out when
>> wind sheer will cause a 737 to crash but football coaches have every
>> gust of wind planed a week in advance. No luck involved at all.
Get real, George. In the last twenty five years only one conference
championship game has been decided by a single point, SF over Dallas
in 1981. And only one game has been decided by two points - Giants
over SF in 1990. There have been a handful of three point games but
the vast majority have been four points or more. Note that in each
of the two closest games the two participants were powerhouses and
the winner went on to take it all. You may consider that "luck" but
I think it would be more accurate to say that they were the best
teams in the league.
|
9.3763 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 06 1995 13:42 | 17 |
|
Was San Diego the best the AFC had to offer? Yeah they had the record but
were they really that much better than the Bucks or Dolphins or did they just
have a few more lucky wins?
I'll never forget that N.F.C Championship game between the Browns and Packers
that was won by a kick into the snow that to this day no one can agree if it
was really good or not.
Then there was B.C.'s Miracle win over N.D. on that long field goal.
Didn't the Giants win a Super Bowl over the Bills a few years back because
someone missed an easy kick? If so does that make Parcells a great coach? Would
he have been less of a coach if the guy hadn't hooked it (or what ever
happened) and the Bills had won?
George
|
9.3764 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Wed Sep 06 1995 13:56 | 25 |
|
>> Then there was B.C.'s Miracle win over N.D. on that long field goal.
BC outplayed ND all day and really shouldn't have put themselves in
the position to need the field goal.
>> Didn't the Giants win a Super Bowl over the Bills a few years
>> back because someone missed an easy kick? If so does that make
>> Parcells a great coach?
Scott Norwood didn't miss "an easy kick". He missed a 47 yarder.
Those ain't automatic. As for Parcells, in the playoffs that year
the Bills had scored 44 points against Miami and 51 against the
Raiders in the AFC title game (lucky, huh?), they only scored
19 against the Giants.
I'm not saying that upsets don't occur but to say that the NFL playoffs
don't determine who the best team is because it's a single elimination
format is ridiculous. The Bill Parcells and Bill Walshes and Jimmy
Johnsons don't leave things to chance. That's why their teams are at
or near the top year after year. It certainly isn't just because they're
lucky.
BTW - the Bucs play in the NFC not the AFC, George.
|
9.3765 | | WMGEN1::abs004p7.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Wed Sep 06 1995 14:06 | 6 |
|
Tommy, I was gonna forget about you calling Santa Clara UCSB and the '81
49ers a powerhouse if you would overlook George calling the Pitts baseball
team or the Milwaukee NBA team an AFc member.
Brews
|
9.3766 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 06 1995 14:25 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3764 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!" >>>
> BC outplayed ND all day and really shouldn't have put themselves in
> the position to need the field goal.
They didn't exactly outplay ND during the 2nd half, ND was going through
the B.C. defense like it wasn't there. Still my point is that you can't say
either coach is or is not good just because of that one game. No one game
proves who is or is not a good coach.
> Scott Norwood didn't miss "an easy kick". He missed a 47 yarder.
> Those ain't automatic. As for Parcells, in the playoffs that year
> the Bills had scored 44 points against Miami and 51 against the
> Raiders in the AFC title game (lucky, huh?), they only scored
> 19 against the Giants.
... and what if that kick had been good? Would that have meant that despite
those other games Parcells would have been a lousy coach? That's what I'm
arguing here, according to what I've been hearing if a coach doesn't win the
big one he's no good. Would Parcells have been a terrible coach if that kick
had been good?
George
|
9.3767 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Wed Sep 06 1995 15:54 | 14 |
|
>> according to what I've been hearing if a coach doesn't win the
>> big one he's no good.
No, what you've been hearing is that if a coach doesn't win the big
one he's not *great*. The league is full of good coaches. There are
only a few *great* ones. I honestly didn't realize what a coach
Parcells was before he got here. I always figured he'd had plenty
to work with in NY. Then he gets here and turns around a pretty woeful
franchise. And LT thanks Big Tuna during his HoF induction for "teaching
him the game of football". And then Phil Simms says pretty much the
same thing during halftime of the Dallas-Giants game. All that is not
the residue of luck.
|
9.3768 | the players carried him off | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Sep 06 1995 16:07 | 5 |
|
everybody knows Buddy Ryan won that Superbowl not Ditka. Just ask
Buddy!
;^)
|
9.3769 | Cowboys have loads of talents.... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Sep 06 1995 16:13 | 8 |
| there is no way in hell that the giants have near as much talent as
the cowboys. The cowboys have arguably the most talent in the
league on both sides of the ball. In fact with Williams back, the
cowboys have to be looked at as the team to beat.. If they get Deion
they won't miss K. Smith at all. Dan Reeves may not be a great coach
but, the Giants are not in the same class as the Cowboys with respect
to talent. What do you think Switzer would do with the Giants?????
|
9.3770 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 06 1995 16:13 | 25 |
| Fine but what if that guy had hit that field goal and LT had gotten a season
ending injury in game 2 of the other year he won? Would that have meant that
Parcells was not a great coach because he hadn't won the big one?
No, he would have been just as great a coach only he would have had worse
luck.
And what about Shulla, is he a great coach or not? There have been times when
he's won, times when he's come close but lost, and times when he was not in
contention. Does he go back and forth between great, good, and lousy or does
his luck change from year to year?
In particular, what about the year he got to the Superbowl because Miami beat
K.C. in that double overtime Christmas day game? Remember Stenerew missing two
sudden death field goals then Yupremian hitting one for the win? Was that all
skill on Shulla's part or was he just lucky that the best kicker in the AFC
missed two field goals that he normally would have made?
Then take Ditka for another example. He won with McMann as QB and the next
year McMann got injured and that made the difference, the Bears couldn't win.
Was Ditka a great coach the year McMann was healthy and a good but not great
coach the year McMann was hurt or was he a great coach both years who was lucky
one year then unlucky the next year?
George
|
9.3771 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Wed Sep 06 1995 16:16 | 3 |
|
George, I think I agreed with your original point, but you've *completely*
lost me...
|
9.3772 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Wed Sep 06 1995 16:35 | 10 |
|
>> In particular, what about the year he got to the Superbowl because
>> Miami beat K.C. in that double overtime Christmas day game?
Miami has been to the SB four times. They did it in '72, '73, '74
and '83. They only played KC in the playoffs on the way to the '73
SB and that was 27-24 in regulation, so I'm not sure what you're
talking about.
|
9.3773 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Sep 06 1995 17:53 | 6 |
|
I think George got confused. The double overtime game was against the
Chargers, wasn't it?
Kevin
|
9.3774 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Sep 06 1995 18:05 | 38 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3772 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill!" >>>
> Miami has been to the SB four times. They did it in '72, '73, '74
> and '83. They only played KC in the playoffs on the way to the '73
> SB and that was 27-24 in regulation, so I'm not sure what you're
> talking about.
Was that the AFC championship game in '73 that they played K.C.? If so
it was on Christmas Day and it was one of the greatest games in NFL history.
K.C. coached by Hank Stram and Miami coached by Shula were the two best
teams in the AFC and they met in the playoffs on Christmas Day. They were
tied at the end of regulation and started playing overtime periods.
K.C got into field goal range twice and Rod Stenerew (sp?) the best kicker
in the AFC missed on both attempts. Then somewhere in the 2nd overtime Miami
finally got into field goal range and ... how do you spell this? ... Gerro
Yepremmian? ... You know, the little kicker for Miami that tried to throw
a pass on that famous highlight clip? ... The "pass" that went about 3
feet and got picked off by a line backer?
Well on this day he was the hero. He kicked the field goal and Miami won
the game by 3 points which would match up with your 27-24 score. It was the
longest playoff game in NFL history when it happened and may still be the
longest game but in my book it was one of the greatest games ever played.
My point is that this game was obviously won mostly by luck. Three field
goals were kicked by the two best kickers in the AFC and as luck would have it
the 3rd one was good, Miami won the game, and went on to the Superbowl. This
did not mean that Shula was great and Stram was not, they were both great
despite the fact that Stram did not make it to the Super Bowl that year.
It is entirely possible for a team to not make it to the Superbowl even
if the coach is great. Or to put it another way, not making it to the
Superbowl does not prove that the coach is not great. It just proves that
his team got beat.
George
|
9.3775 | | CAMONE::WAY | We aim by P.F.M | Thu Sep 07 1995 09:16 | 13 |
| Frank Mendez, part of lack of talent problem on the Giants, is, IMO,
attributable to Dan Reeves. The other part is attributable to George Young.
George, ask us if we really care about all of that.....
It doesn't really matter what WE think about any of this, and it doesn't
amount to much either. Bottom line, an NFL owner is going to go out and
try and find the coach that will win him the Super Bowl..... Nothing else
really matters.
'Saw
|
9.3776 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The stars might lie, but the numbers never do... | Thu Sep 07 1995 09:36 | 7 |
| >Bottom line, an NFL owner is going to go out and
>try and find the coach that will win him the Super Bowl..... Nothing else
>really matters.
Well, there's family, friends, and the love of a wonderful spouse.
Oh - you mean in relation to football...
|
9.3777 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Sep 07 1995 09:46 | 28 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3775 by CAMONE::WAY "We aim by P.F.M" >>>
>It doesn't really matter what WE think about any of this, and it doesn't
>amount to much either. Bottom line, an NFL owner is going to go out and
>try and find the coach that will win him the Super Bowl..... Nothing else
>really matters.
Yes we agree on that. But it's entirely possible that the coach who has
the best shot of winning you the Super Bowl is someone who's never won before.
If you have a choice between
1). A coach who's had about 5 winning seasons, a track record on building
contenders out of average teams, and a few close losses in the playoffs
to other great coaches
OR
2). A coach who's had 4 miserable seasons even though he had good talent
but got to the Super Bowl from the 3rd wild card spot his 5th year
with a couple close upset victories
which one would you take? I know I'd want to go with number 1.
Or to put it another way, just because you never got to a superbowl doesn't
mean you are not a great coach.
George
|
9.3778 | | WMGEN1::abs006p6.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:25 | 1 |
| George, you'rw saying you want Buddy Ryan as your coach???!!!
|
9.3779 | match made in hell | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Sep 07 1995 12:41 | 1 |
9.3780 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Thu Sep 07 1995 13:05 | 3 |
|
George, according to my SI 1995 Sports Almanac the game that
you describe so vividly never took place.
|
9.3781 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Sep 07 1995 13:52 | 5 |
| If it never took place, why did you mention it earlier in one of your notes?
Looks like we both made it up in different places.
George
|
9.3782 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Thu Sep 07 1995 14:18 | 6 |
| >> If it never took place, why did you mention it earlier in
>> one of your notes?
I didn't mention it. I told you that I could find no record of it
and still can't.
|
9.3783 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Sep 07 1995 14:28 | 11 |
| I have no idea what your book includes and doesn't include but I know the
game was played, I watched it.
I was a big Miami fan back then and I remember sitting in my inlaws living
room on Christmas day clinging on to my seat through a couple periods of
overtime until Yapremmian made the kick.
My inlaws were not exactly the type to put things into the eggnog to make
you dream up games like that.
George
|
9.3784 | everyone, singalong... | SALEM::DODA | Ask me about my vow of silence | Thu Sep 07 1995 14:42 | 8 |
| <<< Note 9.3779 by OUTSRC::HEISER "watchman on the wall" >>>
-< match made in hell >-
> Butty the Hut and Billy Bidwill deserve each other.
Been through the desert with an owner with no brain....
daryll
|
9.3785 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Sep 07 1995 17:08 | 6 |
| George is right, the game took place, it was on Christmas Day
in 1971, Miami beat K.C. is double overtime. Ed Podolak had the
greatest day of his career, Jan Stenerud (the AFC pro-bowl kicker
that year), missed two very makeable field goals, and Miami won
on the way to its super bowl loss to Dallas. In my mind one of the
top three NFL games of all time.
|
9.3786 | The reson why KC was my favorite team | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Thu Sep 07 1995 18:16 | 7 |
|
Okay, here's a trivia question. What college did Ed Podolak attend
and what position did he play?
Kevin
|
9.3787 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Sep 08 1995 09:24 | 6 |
| Ed Podolak, I was going to mention him. He probably had the
greatest game of his life in that playoff game against Miami.
He was the KC tailback/fullback. I can't remember where he went
to college, though; Kearney State ? or something along that size,
as I vaguely recall, probably incorrectly.
|
9.3788 | IOWA!! | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Fri Sep 08 1995 11:18 | 7 |
|
Ed Podolak played quarterback for the University of Iowa when I was
a young'un. He was one of the few bright spots while I was growing up
in Iowa City.
Kevin
|
9.3789 | need my fix | STRATA::GARRY | | Tue Sep 12 1995 10:43 | 4 |
| Anyone know a web site which updates Sunday games as they are
happening?
Cowboy Tom
|
9.3790 | I'll update you, Tommy! | CNTROL::SALMON | | Tue Sep 12 1995 10:49 | 11 |
| Tom:
You have my home number. You know I'll have my a$$ on the sofa
all afternoon, every Sunday! Updates become a little more
unintelligible with the passing of each hour, however.
JS
|
9.3791 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Sep 18 1995 11:47 | 23 |
| Well, when I went to watch the Pats game yesterday, after seeing the
Giants stink up the place, I was treated to the KC-Oakland overtime.
Man, I can't believe the final play. If you caught the replay from behind the
offense, you can see that Hostetler threw the pass on timing, as those passes
usually are). Brown either ran a poor pattern, or somehow the umpire (I think
it's the umpire who stands in that area) got in the way, and he and Brown
effectively levelled each other.
By that time the ball was in the air, and Hasty was hastening to the races.
Tough break.
BUT, one has to wonder about the decision NOT to kick the FG two plays before
(prior to the holding call).....
Must've been one of those old-time AFL rivalry type match ups though, from the
sounds of it....
'Saw
|
9.3792 | depends on who you talk to | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 18 1995 11:58 | 20 |
| Saw it, Saw.
Tim Brown and the Raiders maintained that the ref was outta position.
Hasty and the Chiefs said that the ref is parta the field and that Brown
was short on the route.
In any case, it's a timing play where Hoss has to put it in the air as
the play is developing. It's no small wonder that this doesn't happen
more often. Sorta reminds me of the real ol' days when they had the
stupid goal posts in the middle of the field and teams used them for
additional blockers.
Yesterday was kinda funny in that a couple of OTs were settle by a TD.
Besides the Chiefs, the Cowboys scored a TD in OT when Emmitt Smith
turned a routing run off tackle into a routine, for him, TD.
Then there was the Elway TD at the very end of the game against the
Redskins to win by 6.
TTom
|
9.3793 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Sep 18 1995 12:37 | 33 |
| >
>Saw it, Saw.
>
>Tim Brown and the Raiders maintained that the ref was outta position.
>Hasty and the Chiefs said that the ref is parta the field and that Brown
>was short on the route.
>
Yeah. Someone (ie some talking head, either radio or TV) blamed Hostetler,
and I guess I maintain that he did what he was supposed to do -- dropped back
threw the pass....
>In any case, it's a timing play where Hoss has to put it in the air as
>the play is developing. It's no small wonder that this doesn't happen
>more often. Sorta reminds me of the real ol' days when they had the
Ayuh....
Again though, the Raiders had the chance to put it away and ended up
tinkering just a bit too much.
And someone, please, tell Al Davis that the beaded glasses chain looks better
on a librarian than a football owner....
'Saw
|
9.3794 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Mon Sep 18 1995 12:41 | 14 |
|
Saw,
While the outcome was unfortunate for this Raiders fan, the decision
not to kick the field goal was the correct one. If I recall correctly,
the ball was on the 32, this is a 49 yard field goal attempt. Not
exactly a lock considering that it was 1st down. Use a couple of
downs, get 5 more yards and try a 44 yard field goal. Instead, there
is a holding penalty, a broken pattern and a returned INT for a TD. Oh
well. At least the call showed me that the Raiders are legitimate this
year.
Marc
|
9.3795 | cool! | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 18 1995 12:41 | 6 |
| >And someone, please, tell Al Davis that the beaded glasses chain looks better
>on a librarian than a football owner....
I kinda like it. It adds to the Elvis pampadour do, too.
TTom
|
9.3796 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Sep 18 1995 12:44 | 3 |
| And don't forget Jaeger the kicker is hurt........
Jimbo
|
9.3797 | He was good at that | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Sep 18 1995 14:14 | 2 |
| If Flutie was in there he would've made the tackle after the
interception.
|
9.3798 | | CAMONE::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Sep 18 1995 14:28 | 15 |
| I thought the ball was closer for some reason. Perhaps I was confusing it with
the result on the bogus play (holding call).
I wasn't aware that Jaeger was hurt -- I know that Jaecke is hurt in Green
Bay though 8^)
I thought Hoss did a good job getting over there -- and I don't know who it was
but someone almost saved the TD.
Has Brown or the official said anything?
'Saw
|
9.3799 | some perfections | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 18 1995 14:36 | 25 |
| Hoss did almost tackle him but committed to a dive and missed the mark.
Rookie Napoleon Kaufman was the guy who almost caught him.
Meanwhile, there are now only a handful of perfect teams.
At 3-0 are Dallas, San Fran - no surprises there - but also Kansas City
led by Sonny Bono instead of Joe Montana and St Louis, as in the
erstwhile LA Rams. The Cowboys looked like they were sleep walking for
most of the game lasted night against the Vikings. The Niners looked to
be in top shape, with or without Neon, as they slapped Bledsoe and the
Pats around. The Chiefs as mentioned beat a good Raiders team, but they
almost always do winning something like 11 of the lasted 12. The Rams
creamed the Panthers.
At 0-3 are both expansion teams - no surpises there - but also NY Giants
whom Dan Reeves hyped as going to go 11-5 for the year and Detriot who
rewarded Wayne Fontes with a contract extension during the off season.
The Giants continued their downward slide by losing at Green Bay while
the Lions fumbled away any chance to beat the Cards.
FWIW, in the interest of entertainment and the like, the Rams are a
perfect 3-0 in the ::POOL while the Giants are a perfect 0-3.
TTom
|
9.3800 | Raiders lost because they DESERVED to... ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 18 1995 15:14 | 9 |
|
> Tim Brown and the Raiders maintained that the ref was outta position.
BLAMing an official for being out of position in football
has got to be one of the lamest, Hoot-and-Monty-concocted
excuses for losing a game ever devised... ;-)
glenn
|
9.3801 | Monty and the Hootfish? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 18 1995 15:43 | 4 |
| Just like a lot of close, good games, the team that made the lasted big
play won the game. 'Nuff said, as they say.
TTom
|
9.3802 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Two and counting... | Mon Sep 18 1995 16:19 | 11 |
|
Yup,
Have to laugh at Tim Brown. Saying that the ref was out of
position. So Tim does that mean that the play was designed, To pick
off the DB instead of yourself? :^) It was Brown's responsibility
to run in front of the ref 1st. Then look for the ball 2nd. Its usually
a wide open play, because the DB has to go behind the ref of get picked
like Tim Brown did.
Ron
|
9.3803 | 15K club | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 18 1995 16:25 | 18 |
| At least he coulda run over that ol' Clemson ref :^).
Also, in that game, Marcus Allen joined a_elite group of 5 who have
gained more than 15,000 all-purpose yards.
The list:
1. Walter Payton 21,803
2. Tony Dorsett 16,326
3. Jim Brown 15,459
4. Eric Dickerson 15,411
5. Marcus Allen 15,064
I would think that Brown's per game totals would still be tops and that
no matter how good Dickerson's stats are/were he won't get in the Hall of
Fame.
TTom
|
9.3804 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 19 1995 12:56 | 8 |
|
The NFL hs filed a $300 million suit against Jerry Jones for
usurping the league's current marketing arrangement. Given the
league's track record in court, I'd say Jerry doesn't have a
thing to worry about. The real question is, if and when he wins
who will follow suit and seek similar marketing arrangements?
|
9.3805 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Sep 19 1995 13:15 | 6 |
| Wonder how long them corporate 'wagon jumpers will be
around WHEN the Cowboys go down the tubes...
billl
|
9.3806 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 19 1995 13:19 | 6 |
| What makes you think the Cowboys will go down the tubes? They went through
a losing period and retained their popularity and now they are winning.
It would appear that right now things look good for the Cowboys.
George
|
9.3807 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 19 1995 13:38 | 13 |
|
>> They went through a losing period and retained their popularity
No they didn't. 10 years ago this Nike deal never would have
happened. The Cowboys were so bad they couldn't even sell
out in football crazy Texas and sales of Cowboys merchandise
plummeted. And that's really the point. Jerry's just trying
to cash in on the turnaround that he and Jimmy Johnson en-
gineered. If that team takes a downturn and his marketing
arrangements do likewise then so be it. He's willing to
succumb to market forces and for that he's a pariah. Go
figure.
|
9.3808 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 19 1995 13:42 | 8 |
| Maybe he feels he can remain a contender at worse and a winner at best. He
does have a good track record so far.
And if he does fall on hard times he can always sell the team. I've got to
believe that of all the franchise in the 3 major sports the Cowboys would
go for one of the highest prices.
George
|
9.3809 | NOT Jerry ! | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Sep 19 1995 13:57 | 3 |
| >He does have a good track record so far.
Jimmy Johnson.
|
9.3810 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 19 1995 14:10 | 19 |
| Ok, fill me in on what it is you feel I'm missing here.
It appears that one of the guys named Johnson bought the Cowboys. He's now
going off on his own with marketing his merchandise.
It would also appear that
- As long as he keeps winning he should make money because he doesn't have
to share his merchandising with the league.
- If he should forget how to win and tail off a bit he could probably sell
the team for a profit since many rich people (particularly rich Texans)
would see the Cowboy's as an attractive team to buy.
Either way he comes out ahead regardless if his name is Jimmy, Johnny,
Fredrick, or Clarance.
No?
George
|
9.3811 | Answers to your questions | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | I'll make a good Gordon, Gordon | Tue Sep 19 1995 14:25 | 33 |
| Here's what you are missing:
1) Jerry Jones owns the Cowboys. He hired Jimmy Johnson to be his
coach. Johnson turned around a 1-13 team to a multiple Super Bowl
winner. Jones didn't like Johnson getting credit for the Cowboys
success, so he fired him.
2) Johnson's first year, when the Cowboys only won one game, the
Cowboys sold less than 3% of the total officially licensed NFL
merchandise. Last year, they were responsible for 22%.
3) All NFL teams have signed agreements with NFL properties to share in
the profits from items marketed by the NFL and sponsored by the NFL.
Included in these deals are Coca-Cola.
4) Jones tried to skirt the licensing issue by saying he made a deal
with Pepsi for Cowboys stadium, which he also owns. The problem arises
when he tries to tie in advertising and sales of Pepsi with the Cowboys
team and not the stadium, since the NFL has an exclusive arrangement
with Coke, for which Dallas receives its share as an NFL franchise.
5) Jones is continuing to make his own deals in violation of the league
by-laws, with Nike and soon American Express. He is the sole recipient
of the cash from these deals, not the rest of the league.
6) Jones' actions will set up a haves vs have-nots scenario in the NFL
quite similar to Major League Baseball, which football has tried to
avoid for many years.
Hope this helps.
NAZZ
|
9.3812 | I'll bet that somehow Tim McCarver's got his hands in this | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Sep 19 1995 14:43 | 6 |
|
There's no right or wrong with this Jerry Jones situation; there
are only the lawyers...
glenn
|
9.3813 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Sep 19 1995 14:54 | 23 |
| NAZ,
Thanks for filling that in but I still don't see how all that means that the
Cowboy's are going down the tubes.
If I divide 1/30 I get 3.3333% which means that at 3% the Cowboy's were
getting only a fraction of a percentage point below their merchandising share
when they were at their lowest point. If he can keep them at all above that low
point it seems he'll make out better without the league than with them.
So it would appear that if he wins in court he'll be better off without the
league except for those times when the team is terrible in which case he'll be
about where he'd be with them, right around 3%.
And even if he gets himself into a position without Johnson where he's at that
low point all the time (not very likely) he can still probably sell the team
for a record amount of money.
So I still don't see how they are going down the tubes or what Jerry, Jimmy,
Mo, Larry or Curly have to do with anything. This guy Jones is going to make
out like a bandit no matter what he does.
George
|
9.3814 | The myth goes on... | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Sep 19 1995 15:04 | 28 |
| I continue to see the perpetuation of the myth that open / free market
competition is the death nell of the small teams and will ensure that a
small number of big money teams will dominate.
In baseball prior to drafts, caps, regulation etc the national league
which aggressively pursued the best baseball players regardless of
color, had a multiplicity of winners throughout the 50s and 60s. In
non-cap free agency both leagues saw franchises rise and fall both big
and small (put this to verse later) all the while everyone making
money.
In the nba no repeats until the cap is in place then moribund franchises
locked in by caps and drafts. Open market competition, what Jordan and
Ewing want would be a boon to the league.
In football again the 'Cap and restrictions have resulted in two
totally dominant teams getting better every year with their success
creating an environment which overcomes cap limits and furthur
entrenches this new duopoly.
Nazz, you and Dale Arnold need to get away from your corporate buddies
and hang with the agents and independent thinking reporters (I'd try
Bulpett, no I wouldn't sic Andleman on you). Btw, Jackie McMullan had
a tremendous interview/article with Patrick in today's Globe. Must
reading for any lingering mailman aficionados.
|
9.3815 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Sep 19 1995 15:12 | 6 |
|
After watching sunday nite's game all I can say is the Niners can't
be all that smart if they can let a talent like Charles Haley get
away. Who did they get in that idiotic trade anyway????????????
mike
|
9.3816 | | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Tue Sep 19 1995 15:51 | 6 |
| Is just the NFL suing Jones or the NFL and the Player Union? According
to the last CBA the players have the right to X percent of the leagues
gross revenues including NFL Properties. Is Johnson trying to get around
this?
Mike
|
9.3817 | sour grapes | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Tue Sep 19 1995 15:59 | 15 |
| Right now it's just the NFL that's suing Jones.
Who gets what outta the properties is a minor mystery in most sports. In
football, there's been several shakeups. A year or so ago, the league
signed some agreement with one of the companies while a handful of stars,
Aikman, Montana, etc., signed on with a comptetitor. Supposedly, the
lasted agreement dealt with this issue.
What is real apparent is that the other owners are just p*ssed off that
they couldn't and/or didn't work some of these deals theyselves. Like
Jones said, almost all the owners have more money than they know what to
do yet very few even owns their own stadium much less have their own
deals.
TTom
|
9.3818 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Sep 19 1995 16:02 | 4 |
|
If Jonsesy wins do you think he'll pay Emitt what he deserves???
If Deon's woth 5 mil a year and troyboy 6 mil then Emitt should
get 8 or better..........
|
9.3819 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Sep 19 1995 16:03 | 3 |
|
then again maybe they ought to give it to o-line who really deserve
it..........
|
9.3820 | the $64M question: how to re-sign Emmitt | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Tue Sep 19 1995 16:13 | 32 |
| > If Jonsesy wins do you think he'll pay Emitt what he deserves???
This, not the NFL, lawsuits or deals, under the table or otherwise, will
be the demise of Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Emmitt is doing a lot of
talking about how he expects Jones to renegotiate the contract that he
held out for so he could renegotiate.
Emmitt was asked if'n he thought Jones would really follow through and
Emmitt carefully said that this is what Jones said (implying that this is
not necessarily what Jones is going to do.) There's no love loss between
the two of 'em and Aikman can only restructure his contract so many
times.
Signing Emmitt will make the Pepsi deal look like child's play.
> then again maybe they ought to give it to o-line who really deserve
> it..........
And another major problem for them 'Boys. Erik Williams blew his knee
against Minnesota and the prognosis has him missing 2-3 weeks, at best.
Part time retiree Derek Kennard is supposedly returning to the team
thised week and there's some talk about maybe moving guard Larry Allen to
tackle. Allen and Kennard got a lot of the finger pointing lasted year on
why Dallas didn't return. Both have looked bad at times.
And of course, they're missing a couple of starters on D, as well.
And then, ol' Dion will miss some games after baseball goes away for the
winter...
TTom
|
9.3821 | The Jones Football League has a nice ring to it | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | I'll make a good Gordon, Gordon | Tue Sep 19 1995 16:18 | 17 |
| Re a few back: I especially liked Patrick's expression of support for
the people that allow him to get paid $11 million: "I don't care about
the fans." He simply doesn't get it. There will soon come a point
when other fans besides me will stop paying to see professional events,
and the $11 million he receives to play basketball won't be there. The
bottom line is that Patrick Ewing is a typical greedy, selfish athlete
who has been blinded by his own ego and his "advisers" to the truth
that they are not bigger than the sport they play.
As for Jones, he is clearly in violation of the NFL by-laws. IMO, if
he doesn't want to play by the rulews of his league, let him start his
own league.
NAZZ
PS - thanks for not making me listen to Mr. rightwing Eddie Anvilhead
and his "free agency for everyone all the time" nonsense.
|
9.3822 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 19 1995 16:33 | 17 |
|
>> 6) Jones' actions will set up a haves vs have-nots scenario in the NFL
>> quite similar to Major League Baseball, which football has tried to
>> avoid for many years.
In baseball in the last ten years, "small market teams" from
Minnesota (twice), Oakland, Cincinnatti and Kansas City have
managed to win the World Series. In foottball, it's been
SF, Dallas, Washington, Chicago and New York. Show me where
the current scheme enhances competition. It doesn't The myth of
the haves and have-nots is a big bright red herring. It just ain't
so. Market size don't make champions, good front offices do.
That's even more true when you have guaranteed revenue in
the form of tv contracts and fixed expenses in the form of
a salary cap. Jerry Jones isn't going to gain any competitive
advantage. There's none to be had. What he will gain is a
big wad of dough.
|
9.3823 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Sep 19 1995 16:47 | 3 |
|
I still think he should trade Emitt to the Giants......then we'll see
if Emitt really is as good as barry Sanders............
|
9.3824 | | SALEM::DODA | Ask me about my vow of silence | Tue Sep 19 1995 17:24 | 9 |
| This goes even further. After the Nike deal was signed, Jones
asked Smith, Aikman and a couple other to refrain from wearing
their Cowboy ball caps on the sidelines because it caused a
conflict with Nike. The players all have deals with the cap
manufacturer.
Guess how far he got with that?
daryll
|
9.3825 | | DECEAT::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Tue Sep 19 1995 17:49 | 17 |
|
>> Re a few back: I especially liked Patrick's expression of support for
>> the people that allow him to get paid $11 million: "I don't care about
>> the fans."
Talk about your blatant misquotes. What Patrick said in response
to being told his stance was very unpopular was, "I don't care what
the fans think. If I had to do it all over again, I'd do the same
thing." Where the hell would we be if folks took an opinion poll
before they decided which beliefs to stand up for. Also unmentioned
by Nazz is that in the article he also chastised several of the
veteran players for trying to deny the young players what they were
lucky enough to get. He also said that he'll take any booing he gets
in silence. "Too many people turned out to be cowards. You might not
have agreed with me, but I believed in something, and I stepped up.
There aren't many guys who can say the same thing."
|
9.3826 | | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Sep 19 1995 17:54 | 12 |
| I thought Emmitt had a Reebok contract? It was reported that the
deal with Nike and Pepsi allowed Jones to give Deion the 13 million
dollar signing bonus. On another note... The only way that Dallas
will not go and win the superbowl is Switzer. That guy sure seems
to be without clue. They have Minnesota down by 7 with 7 minutes to
play and Dallas comes out throwing. Here you have arguably the best
oline, RB, and FB in the game and your throwing the ball??? Moose and
Emmitt would have kept the ball away from Minnesota at the end...
Then again maybe thats exactly why Jones hired Switzer... I mean if
Dallas can win with Switzer then perhaps Jones is the brains behind
the Cowboys???
|
9.3827 | help ! | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Sep 20 1995 11:36 | 5 |
| Last week I found an area on the Web that has a statistician's account
(ie: play-by-play) of each game. All the stats are there along with
a record of each play run. I can't remember where I saw it, and can't
find it this week. Has anyone else seen this ? I don't see it in
ESPNET of NANDO.
|
9.3828 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Wed Sep 20 1995 13:12 | 29 |
|
"This attack on NFL Properties is part of the pressure
for teams to move because if they're going to do their
own marketing, then everyone is going to try and move to
the best market."
_NFL Commissioner Paul Tagliabue
Wake up and smell the Atomic Balm, Paul. The number two
market in the country, LA, doesn't have an NFL franchise.
Remember? The Rams bolted for St Louis. That's a better
market? The Raiders left for Oakland. That's a better market?
And what town gets mentioned most as a possible destination
for a franchise on the move? Baltimore. There it sits out
there on the wrong coast a big fat juicy megalopolis ready
to be plundered and no one cares because being a big market
means nothing. The real money is in moving. Ask Irsay. Ask
Frontiere. Ask Al Davis. And if that's not an option you
can always pull the old stick 'em up for a stadium move .
Since you can't make any real money from marketing you may
as well be in Jacksonvile or Green Bay instead of Los Angeles
at least you're guaranteed the gate because there sure as hell
ain't anything else to do in those burgs.
|
9.3829 | facts, rules, other sports? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Sep 21 1995 11:42 | 7 |
| What are the rules for the other sports regarding marketing their own
merchandise vis a vis nfl style sharing? It would appear that the
celtics fe. receive their own revenue not to speak of the Bulls.
To paraphrase you Tommy, it would appear that the nfl is losing out on
the merchanising pie by doing less marketing which is best done by the
individual teams.
|
9.3830 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Thu Sep 21 1995 13:37 | 26 |
|
>> To paraphrase you Tommy, it would appear that the nfl is losing out on
>> the merchanising pie by doing less marketing which is best done by the
>> individual teams.
Think of it this way, Wellington Mara chokes to death on his steak
tartare at Le Cirque. In order to settle his estate the family sells
the Giants. Now the Giants have a great fan base but the city of San
Antonio is offering the new owner a discount lease on the Alamo Dome and
a pile of tax incentives. Why not move? There's little advantage to
the owner to be in the largest market in the country. The only advantage
that I can see is that the tv contract that everyone shares in will
be bigger with teams in the largest markets than without but since you
only get a 1/30th share so what? You may as well be somewhere where
the cows outnumber the people if the money is right. Which explains
why the second biggest market in the country has no team. So when
Tagliabue says that letting each team do its own marketing will
encourage teams to move to the best markets he's all wet. First of all,
shouldn't that be the idea? To have teams in the best markets? Secondly
what does he expect 8 teams in New York where we already have two? A
*single* team in Los Angeles where there is NONE? The only thing that
keeps teams where they are now is the whim of the owner and the cities'
willingness to kowtow to those whims. If teams did their own marketing
would anyone take Bob Kraft seriously if he threatened to move to
Hartford, Connecticut? I doubt it.
|
9.3831 | If we rake the pasture, will they come? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Sep 21 1995 15:25 | 8 |
| Well in that case I think Jefferson NH is in line for a new franchise.
Last I looked (dusk is a good time) I counted 1300 cows and that's
without counting the herds in Lancaster. I'm darned sure there's more
cows than people and if necessary I can throw in the pigs to make the
count.
In fact we can move them one town over and call them the Lost
Nation Patriots, a truly appropriate moniker even without Billy leading
them.
|
9.3832 | What next? OJ for NFL Commish | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Thu Sep 21 1995 15:45 | 6 |
|
From the local rag:
The NFL canceled todays filing of their suit against Jerry Jones and the
Cowboys. No reason was given.
|
9.3833 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Sep 21 1995 15:46 | 3 |
| Sounds like a deal is in the making.
George
|
9.3834 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Thu Sep 21 1995 16:37 | 11 |
|
The NFL didn't cancel the filing of their suit against Jones.
A hearing to discuss the temporary restraint barring Jones from
filing any lawsuits of own against the league outside of the
New York Federal Court was canceled when Jones said he wouldn't
file suit without advance notice.
BTW _ Harvard Law professor Paul Weiler says that Jones wants to
have his cake and eat it too. But adds that if Jones goes to
court against the NFL, "He'll win."
|
9.3835 | up for suspension? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Fri Sep 22 1995 10:37 | 9 |
| The potential problem that Jones will face is that if'n he presses the
league, the league has the authority to suspend him.
I know that this is unlikely but ya gotta remember this is a private
club. Baseball set a precedent when they suspended Steinbrenner and Marge
for seasons. I recollect that they couldn't have anything to do with the
club for a year.
TTom
|
9.3836 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Kill! | Fri Sep 22 1995 11:19 | 19 |
|
>> The potential problem that Jones will face is that if'n he presses the
>> league, the league has the authority to suspend him.
>> I know that this is unlikely but ya gotta remember this is a private
>> club. Baseball set a precedent when they suspended Steinbrenner and Marge
>> for seasons. I recollect that they couldn't have anything to do with the
>> club for a year.
Not going to happen. Not with a lawsuit already in the works. If they
tried it, they'd find themselves slapped with a court injunction and
probably on the losing end of another lawsuit. Marge was suspended for
racist comments that were detrimental to the image of baseball. George
was suspended for hanging out with gamblers, also detrimental to the image
of baseball. Jerry is trying to subvert NFL properties. All he's doing
is being greedy. Kind of ironic that the owners, Gordon Gecko discpiples
all, have no problem with holding up tax payers and entire cities but try
and cut their entitlements and they start crying for their rattle.
|
9.3837 | some good games | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 25 1995 12:01 | 22 |
| meanwhile, some good as in interesting games.
The Eagles score the firsted 17 and then watch as the Raiders score the
lasted 48.
Tampa Bay gave Washington about 6 plays from the 2 afore intercepting a
pass in the end zone to save a 14-6 victory.
Both Arizona and Jacksonville scored late TDs to lose by less then some
considered the margin to be. Cowboys beat the Cards 34-20 and the Packers
won 24-14. Close and a couple cigars for them dogs.
The Giants won a battle of oh-fers. The Saints are now ahead in the poll
for who's the worsted team in the league aside from the expansion teams.
Of course, Detroit is still winless going into tonight's game agin the
Niners.
Cleveland won a big conference handing the Chiefs their firsted loss and
San Diego both won pretty big division game ramming Natrone Means down
the Donks' throats.
TTom
|
9.3838 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Mon Sep 25 1995 14:07 | 9 |
|
Dragging out the dead horse again...
The biggest 'plaint about Jerry Jones cash grab was that
it would upset the competitive balance of the league. Has
there been a week yet with more than one entertaining game
on tv? Look at next week's schedule. Is there one decent
game on it?
|
9.3839 | some, some not | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 25 1995 14:38 | 14 |
| Entertaining is in the eyes of the beholder.
I make the distinction between good and entertaining so I think that the
the Tampa Bay-Washington game was entertaining. We had that one on at 1.
Then came the San Siego-Denver game and I thought it was good and
entertaining.
Then came the Green Bay-Jacksonville which was neither.
Tonight's not gonna be much to watch, neither. Unless Scott Mitchell
decides to ignore Wayne Fontes and Barry holds onto the ball, and ...
TTom
|
9.3840 | | KSTREL::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 25 1995 14:56 | 11 |
| If it's entertainment they want that would be easy. Just have the cheer
leaders on more. Heck, I watched the entire Cowboy game and the most famous
cheerleaders in the country were only on for two quick shots. And this was FOX.
That seems to be a trend, it's almost as if they deliberately avoid cheer
leaders in NFL games. You see them quite a bit more in college games.
Oh yeah, the cowboys were out on the field grinding the weekly sacrificial
offering into a gooey sort of mush that oozed off the field after the game.
It wasn't pretty.
George
|
9.3841 | good is bad | HBAHBA::HAAS | Network Consonant III | Mon Sep 25 1995 15:06 | 8 |
| re; Cheerleaders
The NFL and NBA are trying to market themselves as wholesome, family
value type of entertainment so they've been downplaying cheer leaders
which apparently are a_integral part of what's good in college football
but are unwholesome in the professional game.
TTom
|
9.3842 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Sep 25 1995 18:35 | 7 |
| No that can't be it. If they were bothered by cheerleaders all they'd have
to do is not allow them on the field in the 1st place.
But they do seem to go out of their way to avoid them, you see them a lot
more in College games. Maybe it's just coincidence.
George
|
9.3843 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Sep 29 1995 14:08 | 2 |
| Can someone with the Herald or the Globe post this Sunday's NFL TV
games for the Boston area (please include Providence and NH stations) ?
|
9.3844 | For Boston (from Globe) | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Sep 29 1995 15:42 | 5 |
| Patriots 1pm channel 7 which is nbc
4pm giants - 49s on Fox
8pm jets on tnt
|
9.3845 | Another 4pm game | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Sep 29 1995 15:43 | 1 |
| Also 4pm nbc San diego - pitt
|
9.3846 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Sep 29 1995 16:34 | 1 |
| Thanks.
|
9.3847 | collective yawn | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon Oct 02 1995 16:55 | 1 |
9.3848 | the curse of Kotite | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Oct 03 1995 14:22 | 4 |
|
How about those J-E-T-S!!!!!!!!!
mike
|
9.3849 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Oct 03 1995 15:39 | 6 |
| > -< the curse of Kotite >-
>
>
> How about those J-E-T-S!!!!!!!!!
He's almost as bad as Dan Reeves....8^)
|
9.3850 | shoulda seen it | HBAHBA::HAAS | arpecay iemday | Wed Oct 04 1995 11:02 | 9 |
| > How about those J-E-T-S!!!!!!!!!
All of us who din't pick the Raiders-Jets game as the lock of the week
should be ashamed.
Not quite as ashamed as a team that would pick up Kotite as a coach.
What, was Joe Walton unavailable?
TTom
|
9.3851 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Oct 04 1995 12:43 | 3 |
9.3852 | AC was a great one. | SALEM::DODA | Ask me about my vow of silence | Fri Oct 06 1995 13:26 | 8 |
| Anthony Carter has retired.
Being a Vikings fan, I can recall some unbelievable catches
(remember the one when he was flat on his back?) including a
playoff game against New Orleans a few years ago that
was unbelievable.
daryll
|
9.3853 | | WMGEN1::abs003p5.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Mon Oct 09 1995 20:38 | 3 |
| He almost singlehandedly prevented the 9ers from winning the SB one year.
brews
|
9.3854 | He did it all that day | ACIS02::WIERSBECK | | Tue Oct 10 1995 12:04 | 4 |
| 1988. Vikes 36 San Fran 24 in the Stick.
Spud
|
9.3855 | What ever happened to this guy? | CNTROL::SALMON | | Tue Oct 10 1995 13:35 | 1 |
| Why did he retire? Did he really go downhill that bad?
|
9.3856 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Oct 10 1995 14:49 | 12 |
| If the playoffs began tomorrow, home field advantage in the
two conferences would belong to:
Kansas City and St.Louis !
Playoffs would be Green Bay at Tampa Bay, Atlanta at San Fransisco,
with St.Louis, Dallas having byes;
Indiananapolis at Cleveland, Oakland at Miami, with Kansas City,
Buffalo having byes.
I wonder what people in Missouri are thinking right now ?
|
9.3857 | time to recycle the 30-year vets | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Oct 10 1995 15:30 | 5 |
9.3858 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 10 1995 15:47 | 3 |
| Bring back instant replay.
George
|
9.3859 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Oct 10 1995 16:00 | 9 |
| I'd rather see better trained, more competent, officials
before instant replay.
Did anyone else ever wonder why if it was "instant" replay
it always took them so damn long?
billl
|
9.3860 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Oct 10 1995 16:05 | 7 |
| Instant replay was a reference to the fact that they don't have to develop a
film.
Now if they did that to correct calls you would really see some delays in the
game.
George
|
9.3861 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Rocky Mountain Ichthyologist | Tue Oct 10 1995 16:07 | 2 |
|
The ref's involved in the 12 man screw up were suspended for one game.
|
9.3862 | time for a change | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Oct 10 1995 17:03 | 1 |
9.3863 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Oct 11 1995 10:31 | 11 |
| > I wonder what people in Missouri are thinking right now ?
My sister-in-law is from Missouri. Based on that singular experience, how can
you put the words "think" and "Missouri" in the same sentence?
Just kidding folks! JUST KIDDING.....
'Saw
|
9.3864 | Foster signs then quits? | HBAHBA::HAAS | conched out | Thu Oct 26 1995 14:15 | 17 |
| Did I hear that Barry Foster who signed yesterday with the Cincinnati
Benglas has already quit?
I was travelling and listening to the Sports Babe and they have Geek of
the Week on Wednesday where you nominate notable sportsters for their
stupiditiy, inanity or actions that otherwise indicate what idiots they
are.
For instance, Andre Rison is getting a lot of votes for guaranteeing that
the Browns would beat the Jaguars. Firsted of all, they were favored by
13 so it weren't exactly Joe Willie and the Colts. Then they go out and
lose.
Wail, anyway, Foster got a couple of votes for already stiffing Cincy.
Did this happen?
TTom
|
9.3865 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Oct 26 1995 14:20 | 2 |
| Supposedly Foster went back in to the Cinci front office, returned
his signing bonus, and is looking for another job.
|
9.3866 | who needs 'im | HBAHBA::HAAS | conched out | Thu Oct 26 1995 14:35 | 10 |
| Doin' what cause it shore don't look like he's a football player anymore.
As I understand it, they offered him a mil, true?
In any case, I think the Bengals are the better for it. They're starting
to come around and with the way Jeff Blake is throwing and Pickens, Scott
et.al. are catching, their running game is solid enough without bringing
in a bum like Foster.
TTom
|
9.3867 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Mon Oct 30 1995 08:46 | 6 |
| Right now, it's hard to imagine anyone except Dallas winning the
Super Bowl.
Oakland may be the best contender, but I can't see any NFC team as
a challenger, and perhaps only Oakland and Cincinnati can score enough
to keep the Super Bowl interesting for a half.
|
9.3868 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 08 1995 14:22 | 25 |
|
>> Then again, that free market system works just great for the
>> players, it's those pesky owners getting all they can that you
>> seem to have a problem with....
>> daryll
Nope. I have no problem with a free market system for the owners.
Quite the opposite. *I'm* all for Jerry Jones getting paid Nike bucks.
My problem is with spending taxpayer dollars to support something
as frivolous as the sport of football. Besides revenue sharing isn't
a 'free market system'. And I would argue that revenue sharing is a
large part of what is wrong with the NFL. Personal Seat Licenses,
luxury boxes, franchise moves all have two things in common. They're
all revenue that the owners of the franchises don't have to share
with each other. The other thing they have in common is that in every
instance it's the average fan that gets screwed to the wall. There is
something seriously wrong with the picture when the second largest
market in the country (L.A.) can't support a team or when a city that
has provided 30 years of sellouts and unparalleled tv numbers loses
its team. Modify much of revenue sharing and the strong football cities
like Cleveland and Pittsburg thrive and the places that can't or won't
support a team are the ones who watch their teams leave and they prob-
ably wouldn't care anyways.
|
9.3869 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | I packed my John Lee Hooker | Wed Nov 08 1995 14:29 | 3 |
|
Tommy, I know of a few states were you would be shot at sunrise for
saying fottball is a frivolous sport.
|
9.3870 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | Northwestern Wildcats Bandwagon | Wed Nov 08 1995 15:10 | 27 |
| > Nope. I have no problem with a free market system for the owners.
> Quite the opposite. *I'm* all for Jerry Jones getting paid Nike bucks.
> My problem is with spending taxpayer dollars to support something
> as frivolous as the sport of football.
Well, it certainly is part of the marketplace - free market economic
theory certainly allows for local governments to act as an agent for
the collective common good. I suppose the question is whether or not
the agent really is acting on behalf of the people; that needs to be
decided at the ballot box. I certainly don't see how one can argue
that players and unions have the rights they have today, yet deny that
owners should have the right to do anything they want to their franchises.
If fans want to organize and have a greater say in things, that's fine,
but it will never happen. It's probably the only way to address this
"problem" that's been described. I beginning to think I don't see it
as a real problem in any case.
Of course, in a real free market, there wouldn't be any league that
prevents franchises from being added to or removed from the league at
will. That could possibly keep the costs down, but would fans maintain
interest in professional football ?
Professional sports are oligopolies, and economic theory doesn't project
any sort of "equitable" or "fair market pricing" results from such
situations. In other such types of economies, governments typically
tend to regulate the industry to achieve such ends.
|
9.3871 | Ok who'll give me 50 mil for patriots, I see 50, now 55... | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Nov 08 1995 15:16 | 10 |
| I doubt that Cleveland will be without a football team for long.
Baltimore showed the country a successful poaching strategy: vote in a
hefty bounty and then put a time limit on spending it so the game will
have to make a decision to take the pig on the table or hope the one in
the poke will come out - yep, they'll take the the first.
Whew, all those metaphors are making me hungry.
Now instead of draft day for college seniors we can have draft day for
cities and teams. One big pig auction.
|
9.3872 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 08 1995 16:26 | 20 |
| >> I certainly don't see how one can argue that players and unions
>> have the rights they have today, yet deny that owners should have
>> the right to do anything they want to their franchises.
Neither do I and I'm not. My point is that there's something wrong
when the number two market in the country doesn't have a team. And
there's something wrong when a city that has supported its team the
way Cleveland has is about to lose that team. Clearly, something is
amiss when Modell even feels the need to move. If you can't make money
(and I doubt that he isn't) when you have 30 years of sellouts and
the number 1 local tv ratings in the league then something is broke
and it needs fixing fast. Either Modell is incompetent or the system
sucks or both. The NFL is going about things the wrong way, IMO, by
trying to fight these franchise moves. They can't legally do a thing
about them. What they need to do is look at the root cause of these
moves which, again IMO, is revenue sharing and the mthods used to
subvert it lke PSLs, luxury boxes, stadium deals, etc. Maybve if
Modell was capitalizing off of that tremendous fan support like he
should have been then the Browns wouldn't be moving.
|
9.3873 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 08 1995 16:33 | 28 |
| The problem is that the economics of professional sport is changing. Under
the old system teams went shopping for the biggest market available and moved
their teams to those areas. Moving happened slowly along with things like the
westward expansion of the nation and the industrialization of the South.
Now instead of looking for big markets like L.A. owners are looking for
cities where they can get public funding. And it could be anywhere. Maybe some
county in Texas consisting of one big ranch with 6000 permanent residents, five
of whom are a billionaires will cut a deal for a team.
Then instead of the Cleveland Browns and the L.A. Rams we'll have the Drydust
Clatons and the Prettygulch Monros. And as sponsors get more involved those
teams will find themselves playing the Rebock Pumps and the Nike Shoe Laces.
It should come as no surprise that this is happening now. This was caused by
the leagues over expanding as a result of TV over investing in the 80's. Then
when TV pulled back the TV money got spread so thin that teams just couldn't
make a go under the system that worked in the 60's and 70's with smaller
leagues and more of a TV share per team. (The ancient system under which even
smaller leagues of 12-16 existed without TV has long since been dead.)
What ever, there's no question we are going through another period of
instability in professional sports as the market and the courts decide what the
new rules will be. Considering just how much money is available it will
eventually all shake out into some new form of stability but that could take a
decade or more before it finally happens.
George
|
9.3874 | We may have something here... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Wed Nov 08 1995 16:58 | 9 |
|
> Tommy, I know of a few states were you would be shot at sunrise for
> saying fottball is a frivolous sport.
But most of those states and their football could survive quite
nicely without the No Fun League. Including Texas...
glenn
|
9.3875 | These kind of pure bribes are indefensible... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | If you're traveling back to Georgia | Wed Nov 08 1995 17:08 | 21 |
|
> Well, it certainly is part of the marketplace - free market economic
> theory certainly allows for local governments to act as an agent for
> the collective common good.
It's espousing this kind of Keynesian fiscal policy that'll get you
kicked out of the Republican Party yet, Rollins-- oh yeah, I forgot,
pure capitalistic theory doesn't apply to [insert overdub of John
Facenda, voice of God] THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE.
> Professional sports are oligopolies, and economic theory doesn't project
> any sort of "equitable" or "fair market pricing" results from such
> situations. In other such types of economies, governments typically
> tend to regulate the industry to achieve such ends.
Governments can and will be corrupted by reptilian creatures like
Al Davis and Art Modell...
glenn
|
9.3876 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 08 1995 17:33 | 30 |
| Well it's easy to point the finger at the owners going for the big money but
the problem is that the old system just doesn't work any more. The flip side of
what I was saying about there being a new economic system is that the old one
no longer works.
When TV over invested the leagues expanded but when TV cut back and stopped
creating stability in these gigantic 30 team leagues everything started coming
apart at the seams. Teams that were more successful finding revenue from
things like merchandise, black mailing cities, etc were able to drive up player
salaries leaving the have nots hurting because the traditional form of revenue,
TV + Box office, was not enough to pay the bills.
When TV invests heavily in sports it creates one giant market in which 30
teams can be more or less equal. When TV cuts down and 30 teams all try to
compete at very different revenue levels the only result can be disaster.
I see two solutions. Either the NFL and MLB find another sugar daddy like TV
to chip in 10's of billions of dollars or they cut back to a level where the
difference between the haves and have nots is not that great.
In baseball it seems to be about 10 teams that can't make it. If they cut
back to 22 or 24 teams and only 2-3 teams were struggling a patch in the dike
like profit sharing would probably even things out. Most likely the NFL is at
about the same level with 10 or so teams asking for handouts when only 2-4
could be supported by league welfare.
It's sad but some unless a completely new source of revenue is found, some
teams are going to have to go. I don't see any alternative.
George
|
9.3877 | It's getting sickening | CSLALL::BRULE | you killed freakin Larry! | Thu Nov 09 1995 08:47 | 13 |
| What kills me is the same major cities that are tripping over
themselves to build stadiums, give sweetheart deals to successful
business men, and generally prostituting themselves to have 10 pro
football games in their cities with taxpayers money, have let their
schools and athletic programs go down hill. Gee Baltimore invest 50
million into your schools AND it's sports program and you'll receive a
lot more then you'll get back from Modell. St Louis spends 200 million
to build a Stadium for Ms. Frontiero (sp) and it's innercity is almost
a war zone. Great. Boston will probably lose the Pats in the next 5
years to one of these wannabe cities but if it's that the price we'll
see you later Bob.
Mike
|
9.3878 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Thu Nov 09 1995 09:08 | 8 |
| re .3877:
I think that was Tommy's point. As much as I enjoy
watching professional sports, I couldn't agree more.
billl
|
9.3879 | If a business goes under in the real world, no one saves you | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Barros > Douglas | Thu Nov 09 1995 09:59 | 16 |
| I am really tired of pro sports owners arguing that theirs is a
business like any other, and that they are doing what they have to in
order to survive.
If Modell was really in a business and lost the $21 million over the
last two seasons he claims to have lost, he would have been out of
business, and rightfully so. The Browns should have gone into Chapter
11 or he would have had to sell the team before they wenty bankrupt.
The option to move the team would not exist. When the local
departement store in Lowell (Stuart's) lost money for two straight
years, they went out of business. It would be grat if sports ran like
that, so that an incompetent owner like Modell couldn't be saved by a
financial windfall from another city. He was incompetent, so he gets
rewarded with an inredicle sweetheart deal. Only in America.
NAZZ
|
9.3880 | Too lie is to own a football team | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Nov 09 1995 10:50 | 18 |
| Modell said part of the problem was that the Cap had gone up because of
the luxury box (etc) revenue other teams were getting went into the
pot.
Has the cap level per team truly gone up that much? Is the
difference between his spending and revenues right now that much
different than five years ago?
Modell also mentions that he didn't want to counter the Baltimore
offer with a Cleveland matching offer for ethical reasons - more than
likely is that the Baltimore deal he was offered would have been
jeopardized if he had played Baltimore off vs Cleveland and vv.
Baltimore officials seem to have been very shrewd during these
negotiations.
Finally this business about losing money. Until the tax returns
and all financial data connected with "Art Modell Enterprises" can be
examined the particular cyclical ups and downs of the Cleveland Browns
business can't be described by "lost 21 mil over two years".
|
9.3881 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 12:26 | 16 |
| I agree with the idea that it probably makes little sense for tax payers to
pay huge amounts of money for these teams but I disagree with the implication
that Cities like Baltimore are forcing tax payers to cough up this money.
Cities like Baltimore consist of tax payers. They are the same people. The
reason the city fathers of Baltimore have their jobs is because their tax
payers voted them in to office. If the tax payers want the money for something
else they should express that feeling on election day.
In effect, each group of tax payers, be it city or state, gets to decide for
themselves if they want to spend their money to support a team like the Browns
or put it to better use. We may not agree, but if that's what the people of
Baltimore want and they are willing to pay for it with their taxes then who are
we to say they are wrong? It's their money.
George
|
9.3882 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Thu Nov 09 1995 12:26 | 6 |
|
The only reason Modell didn't play the Cleveland vs Baltimore ransom
game was because the Cardinals and some other team where lining up at
the door ready to take Baltimore's money if he didn't move quickly.
mike
|
9.3883 | stupid is as stupid does | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 09 1995 12:53 | 14 |
| > The only reason Modell didn't play the Cleveland vs Baltimore ransom
> game was because the Cardinals and some other team where lining up at
> the door ready to take Baltimore's money if he didn't move quickly.
Supposedly this is the essence of the urgency that Modell is trying to
claim. But hey Art, wouldn't it be better to keep this little agreement
to yourself until the season is over. I guess, I'm gonna have a
semi-historical memento: a ticket indicating that I've thrown money away
on the Browns winning the Super Bowl thised year.
The nexted home game should be interesting for them Browns, too, also,
yet.
TTom
|
9.3884 | What Game Was It??? | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Thu Nov 09 1995 12:59 | 32 |
| re: .3763
I just read this reply.
George, you said you'd "never forget" the NFC championship game between
the Browns and Packers in the snow and won by the Packers by a field
goal that to this day no one really knows if it was good.
Being a Packer fan, I'm really interested in this.
First of all, there was no NFC until the merger between the two leagues
and since that time, the Packers and Browns never met in a playoff
game. Secondly, if they did, it could not be an NFC championship
game as Cleveland is in the AFC. They would have to meet in the
Super Bowl.
Third, the Packers and Browns played in only one NFL championship
game and the game was in 1965. The Packers won handily and I am pretty
sure there was no snow.
I am curious...might it have been the 1965 playoff game between the
Colts and the Packers? They played because they had identical records.
The game went into OT after Don Chandler made a game tying field goal.
This field goal was highly questioned. (My dad told me it was no
good.) The game winning FG was not in doubt, however, had Chandler
missed the one before the end of regulation, I don't think the Packers
had much if any chance to win.
Anyway, were you referring to that game?
Tony
|
9.3885 | ~/~ | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:04 | 6 |
| re: Browns vs Packers for NFC championship
Let's see, this is Cleveland so it's prolly more a case of a Groaner-fack
that a Heiser filter.
TTom
|
9.3886 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:19 | 29 |
| Are you sure there was no NFC before the merger? I thought that for a few
years before the merger the NFL was divided into 4 division, the NFC East,
NFC West, AFC East, and AFC West.
As I recall when they did the merger the new division were more or less
made up from the old ones with a few teams moving around something like:
Old Way New Way
------- -------
NFL NFC East NFL NFC East
NFL NFC West NFL NFC East
NFL AFC East NFL AFC Central
NFL AFC West NFL NFC Central
AFL East NFL AFC East
AFL West NFL AFC West
This could be off a bit it's been a long time but I think it went something
like that.
Anyway the thing I was trying to say there is that I remember watching a game
around that time and either Chandler or Groza kicking it away into the snow and
a big controversy resulting because no one could agree if it should have been
good or not from watching the film.
The thing I'll "never forget" is that the game turned on a kick in bad
weather that was very close, hence in some cases luck does have a lot to do
with who wins a championship.
George
|
9.3887 | common ground | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:24 | 14 |
| > This could be off a bit it's been a long time but I think it went something
>like that.
I think we found something we can agree on ;-).
Like it's been said afore, there weren't no AFC/NFC afore the merger.
Just the AFL and NFL.
The most memorable Browns playoff game fer me was the ice bowl against
the Raiders where Brian Sipe[s] threw one too many passes and coughed up
a_interception when all they needed was a FG. The Raiders went on to win
it all, I believe.
TTom
|
9.3888 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:43 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3887 by HBAHBA::HAAS "graffiti limbo" >>>
>Like it's been said afore, there weren't no AFC/NFC afore the merger.
>Just the AFL and NFL.
Do you disagree about the NFL being divided into 4 divisions before the
merger? If so, how were they organized?
I seem to remember that before the early 60s they had two groups of teams
that were called either Eastern/Western Conference or National/American
conference.
Then I think that around 1960 the National and American Conferences were
divided up into two divisions each with the NFL playoffs consisting of one
round of Conference championship games between the division winners and an NFL
championship game the next week.
Are you saying that is wrong? If so, then how was the NFL structured before
the merger and what did the playoffs look like?
George
|
9.3889 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:46 | 2 |
|
It was Eastern and Western conferences.
|
9.3890 | My Best Guess... | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Thu Nov 09 1995 13:59 | 22 |
| George,
It was the NFL.
Before 1967, there were the western and eastern divisions.
In 1967, there was a further division. The west split into
the Coastal (Colts/Rams/Falcons/49'ers) and the Central (Packers/
Vikings/Lions/Bears).
The east split into the Century and the Capital. I forget the
makeup of these, but I know the Browns and Cowboys were in
separate divisions as they often met each other for the eastern
crown. My guess is: Capital (Cowboys/Redskins/Eagles/Giants)
and Century (Browns/Cardinals/Steelers/Saints).
The eastern part is much guessing and I know the Saints had to
be in there. I'd be curious as to the actual makeup of the league
(NFL) in '67.
Tony
|
9.3891 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Nov 09 1995 14:09 | 15 |
| George,
They put in this think in the 60s called the wild card bowl which
was played between the runner-ups but had no particular meaning but the
winner may have collected some change. I'm sure the Browns must have
made it and perhaps so did the Packers (Colts for sure because I
remember Matte playing in one of them). It only existed for a few
years.
The Browns did have at least one Eastern division playoff with the
Giants and maybe more (perhaps a final game of regular season with the
two tied). The Browns were also on tv in those days so neighborhoods
were divided between Giant fans and Brown fans.
Who did the Colts beat from the East prior to losing to Joe Willie
and the Jets in SuperBowl III?
|
9.3892 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 14:18 | 12 |
| Ok so we're all goofed up.
Tommy says before the merger the NFL was divided into the Eastern and Western
Conference, Tony says Eastern and Western Division divided further into named
divisions. I remember Eastern and Western Conference up to a point, then
National and American Conference, then National and American conference each
divided into Eastern and Western divisions.
Maybe we should look it up then award a big bowl of spinach to the winner.
Not very glamorous but it would be healthy.
George
|
9.3893 | More... | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Thu Nov 09 1995 14:42 | 10 |
| re: -1
George,
It was eastern and western conferences and then divided into
coastal and central divisions and capital and century divisions.
The Colts blasted the Browns en route to SB III.
Tony
|
9.3894 | My cut at it.... | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Thu Nov 09 1995 14:43 | 86 |
| At one point in time I had it all down.
I can verify this this evening, but here's the way I have it.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=
From 1950-1952, the league was aligned into 2 conferences, American
and ?????, when the AAFC merged with the NFL.
In the American conference:
GIANTS
PITTSBURGH
CLEVELAND
WASHINGTON
CHICAGO CARDINALS
PHILADELPHIA
In the "other" conference
BALTIMORE
NY YANKEES
CHICAGO BEARS
DALLAS
GREEN BAY
In 1953 - re-alignment occured again:
Eastern Western
GIANTS BALTIMORE(FROM DALLAS)
PITTSBURGH LA RAMS
WASHINGTON DETROIT
CHICAGO CARDINALS GREEN BAY
CLEVELAND SAN FRANCISCO
PHILADELPHIA CHICAGO BEARS
1960 - Dallas joins the east, Minnesota joins the west
East West
NY Giants Green Bay Packers
Pittsburgh Baltimore
Washington Chicago
Philly LA Rams
Dallas San Fran
Cleveland Detroit
St Louis Minnesota
1961 - Schedule expand to 14 games
1967 - More Expansion - Atlanta and New Orleans
In 1967, they went to the four division format (Capitol, Century, Central,
Coastal)
Century Division Capitol Central Coastal
GIANTS Baltimore Green Bay LA
St. Louis Philadelphia Minnesota San Francisco
Cleveland Washington Chicago Atlanta
Pittsburgh Dallas Detroit New Orleans
1968 - Dallas and St. Louis swap divisions
1970 - AFC/NFC merger Colts, Browns, and Steelers go to AFC
NFC East NFC Central NFC West
GIANTS Green Bay LA
St. Louis Minnesota San Francisco
Dallas Chicago Atlanta
Philadelphia Detroit New Orleans
Washington
AFC East AFC Central AFC West
Buffalo Cleveland Oakland
New England Pittsburgh San Diego
Miami Cincinatti Denver
NY Jets Houston Kansas City
Baltimore
1976 - Expansion - Seattle added to AFC West, Tampa Bay to NFC Central
1993 - Expansion added Charlotte (NC) Panthers and Jacksonville (FLA)
Jaguars, to start play in 1995.
|
9.3895 | 1965? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 14:49 | 14 |
| From various searches off of the SI page on da net -
1965
AFL Championship - Buffalo 20
SD 7
NFL Western Conference Chanpionship Game - Green Bay 13
Baltimore 10
NFL Championship - Green Bay 23
Cleve 12
UMDan
|
9.3896 | Correction: Colts in Coastal in 1967 | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Thu Nov 09 1995 15:20 | 33 |
| re: .3894
Excellent memory, but I know of one correction...
In 1967, the Colts were definitely in the Coastal. I remember
this vividly as the final Colt game was at the Coliseum against
the Rams. Colts came in at 11-0-2 and Rams were 10-1-2 (each
team had two ties). (I know my 9 year old memory serves me
correct! :-)
Rams demolished the Colts 34-7 to win the Coastal division.
They had to face the Pack in the playoffs and most 'experts'
favored the Rams as they felt the Pack was too old and the Rams
too awesome.
Packers 28 Rams 7. Good bye Rams!
Then on to the famed Ice Bowl.
Anyway, the Colts/Rams matchup was for the Coastal title.
The thing that strikes me as very weird is that this all then
requires that the Saints were in the eastern division for a
time. As I know the Central and Coastal makeups.
I even checked to count up 16 NFL teams wondering if maybe the
Saints weren't a team yet by '67. Without them, you only had
15 teams, so they were a team and they had to be in the eastern
division.
Tony
|
9.3897 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Nov 09 1995 15:21 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 9.3891 by AKOCOA::BREEN >>>
> They put in this thing in the 60s called the wild card bowl which
> was played between the runner-ups but had no particular meaning but the
> winner may have collected some change.
I remember those games. There were two weeks of playoffs with the Conference
Championships one week and the NFL championship game and that consolation game
the next.
The announcers use to say that the consolation game was very unpopular with
the players because it didn't mean anything but the big advantage to the fans
was that there was a 2nd game to watch on the weekend they held the
championship game. A 2nd game is what is badly missing from Superbowl Sunday,
hence things like battling beer bottles.
George
|
9.3898 | I'll fix it on Monday... | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Nov 10 1995 08:39 | 28 |
| > Packers 28 Rams 7. Good bye Rams!
>
> Then on to the famed Ice Bowl.
>
> Anyway, the Colts/Rams matchup was for the Coastal title.
>
> The thing that strikes me as very weird is that this all then
> requires that the Saints were in the eastern division for a
> time. As I know the Central and Coastal makeups.
>
> I even checked to count up 16 NFL teams wondering if maybe the
> Saints weren't a team yet by '67. Without them, you only had
> 15 teams, so they were a team and they had to be in the eastern
> division.
Tony, I didn't get a chance to check last night but I will over the weekend.
The damn book was sitting right in the book case, but I had other things to
take care of 8^)
I know that in 1960, or 1961, teams had bye-weeks, because of an uneven number
of teams to play against. I forgot to mention that....
Yes, Nawlins was a team in 1967....I'm pretty sure....
'Saw
|
9.3899 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Nov 10 1995 08:50 | 4 |
| Weren't the saints the one where the fans took to wearing the bags over their
heads?
George
|
9.3900 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Nov 10 1995 08:56 | 7 |
| > Weren't the saints the one where the fans took to wearing the bags over their
>heads?
>
> George
Yes, they ultimately did....
|
9.3901 | whither goeth the Browns? | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Tue Nov 14 1995 10:37 | 24 |
| Wail, pretty much like their owner the Browns pretty much didn't show up.
Firsted of all, all the hoopla about protests and such went for nothin. I
wasn't at the game but what happened to the 30K orange ribbons and
banners? Or did Modell just put the fix in with ABC to not show any of
it?
In any case, the Browns started out seemingly slow. But they were saving
themselves for the second half wherein they gained a grand total of 10,
count 'em 10, total yards and no 1st downs.
For their part the Steelers tried to keep 'em in the game scoring a
meager 7 points by half theyselves. Then the running by Peggram, the
passing to Thigpen and the overall effort of the defense stepped up and
totally stopped the Browns.
The hero of the night had to be Kordell Stewart who did about everything
to spark the team when they needed it. Although he threw a TD and gained
1st downs by running, thowing and optioning, the play that really made a
statement was going over the middle to catch a pass and taking a major
hit. Stewart popped up like nothing happened and headed back to the
huddle to see which of about 11 positions he'd play the nexted down.
TTom
|
9.3902 | gotta love that option play! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Nov 14 1995 11:04 | 10 |
| I was disappointed when our local HS QB wasn't
playing much when he went out to CU. After seeing
Stewart's abilities, I can see why.
He's one heck of a 4th string QB. Look for him to
take over the reins in a year or two.
billl
|
9.3903 | others wish they had injuries | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Tue Nov 14 1995 12:49 | 23 |
| It's walkin wounded time again for NFL QBs.
Here's the current hit parade:
John Elway, Denver - concussion in Eagles game; listed as questionable;
Bill Musgrave listed ahead of Hugh Millen.
Chris Chandler, Houston - bruised nerve in leg from Bengals game;
expected to start.
Jim Harbaugh, Indianapolis - groin (previous injury); expected to start.
Jeff Hostetler, Oakland - injured shoulder in Giants game; expected to
start.
Troy Aikman, Dallas - injured knee in Niners game; listsed as
questionable; Jason Garrett expected to start (backup Wade
Wilson has a sprained right thumb and a cut left hand).
Steve Young, San Francisco - had shoulder scoped; listed as out for 3-4
weeks; Elvis Grbac will start.
TTom
|
9.3904 | Would be a milestone | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 14 1995 13:44 | 7 |
| Ttom and I were arguing about whether Miami will be favored over San
Fran sans Young. We determined that since Dallas and San Fran became
"the big 2" neither has been a dog to the afc.
And I say even with Elvis that San Fran (and Dallas for that matter)
will continue their string of not being an underdog to afc (since first
Dallas Superbowl win)
|
9.3905 | never on monday | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Tue Nov 14 1995 13:48 | 10 |
| And I say that a healthy Dan Marino will be favored at home against a guy
named Elvis even if'n it's the Niners. Pick 'em at the worsted.
In the lasted 4 years, San Fran has been the dog a grand total of 4
times. Once to the Giants, once to the Saints and recently twice to the
Cowboys. And as billte said, never to the AFC.
A friendly wager has ensued...
TTom
|
9.3906 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:18 | 5 |
|
Elway is questionable due to an aching biceps tendon (throwing
wing).
Claybone
|
9.3907 | cooked | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:21 | 10 |
| > Elway is questionable due to an aching biceps tendon (throwing
> wing).
There's a joke in there somewhere right? ;-).
From what I saw of the replays, a couple of rather large Iggles
sandwiched him giving him that warm, glazed look that is popular at this
time of year.
TTom
|
9.3908 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:43 | 2 |
| Did Mike Mamula play for Eagles - didn't hear his name prior Monday
either
|
9.3909 | rumblin stumblin | HBAHBA::HAAS | graffiti limbo | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:47 | 4 |
| yeah, he played well, recovering a fumble in the 4th quarter to set up a
Ricky Watters TD.
TTom
|
9.3910 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:52 | 4 |
| He...could...go...all....the....way.......NAH!
Nice pickup though...
|
9.3911 | Dude is a monsta | AD::HEATH | Relax its only October they got time | Tue Nov 14 1995 15:04 | 5 |
|
Mamula was one of the ones that clobbered Smellway if I remember right.
Jerry
|
9.3912 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Nov 14 1995 15:48 | 5 |
|
as usual when the Donks start to fold Elway takes a powder to avoid
being blame............looks like he taught the move to Aikman...
mike
|
9.3913 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Tue Nov 14 1995 16:01 | 6 |
|
Nice yank there MikeyC. Elway bit it at the start of the 2cd qtr.
Mamula and somebody else sandwiched him thus allowing him a tour
of the stars. On the same play, he injured his throwing arm.
Claybone
|
9.3914 | Still Wondering | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Fri Nov 17 1995 08:14 | 8 |
| I'm still curious about what the exact NFL alignment was in the
late 60's/early 70's.
Cam, did you find out? I'm especially wondering where the Saints
were and what the make-up of the Century and Capital divisions
were.
Ton
|
9.3915 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Nov 17 1995 08:40 | 10 |
| Oh yeah, that's right.
THAT'S what I've been forgetting to do.... I'll try to remember to get the
book out over the weekend and write it down.
I've been doing research on other stuff and I'd forgotten about this one....
'Saw
|
9.3916 | Thanks | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Fri Nov 17 1995 12:17 | 7 |
| 'Saw,
Thanks...and excuse me for calling you 'Cam'!!
(some kind of a mental slip)
Tony
|
9.3917 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Nov 17 1995 12:34 | 17 |
| >
> 'Saw,
>
> Thanks...and excuse me for calling you 'Cam'!!
>
> (some kind of a mental slip)
>
> Tony
>
Tony,
Don't sweat it. I've been called MUCH worse, and I don't mind being called
Cam, at any rate.
I'll try to remind myself to look in the book tonight or over the weekend....
|
9.3918 | Here's the answers.... | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Nov 20 1995 08:44 | 165 |
| You asked for it, here it is, from the Football Encyclopedia.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Here's what I found..... All divisions in alphabetical order.
1960
Eastern Conference Western Conference
------------------ ------------------
Cleveland Browns Baltimore Colts
New York Giants Chicago Bears
Philadelphia Eagles Dallas Cowboys *
Pittsburgh Steelers Detroit Lions
St. Louis Cardinals Green Bay Packers
Washington Redskins Los Angeles Ram
San Francisco 49ers
Note:
Dallas Cowboys were an expansion team, first year in the league.
St. Louis Cardinals had just moved from Chicago.
Teams played 14 games, but had a bye week due to the unbalanced
leagues
1961-1965
Eastern Conference Western Conference
------------------ ------------------
Cleveland Browns Baltimore Colts
Dallas Cowboys Chicago Bears
New York Giants Detroit Lions
Philadelphia Eagles Green Bay Packers
Pittsburgh Steelers Los Angeles Rams
St. Louis Cardinals Minnesota Vikings *
Washington Redskins San Francisco 49ers
Note:
Minnesota added in 1961, and Dallas moved to Eastern Conference.
Bye week went away.
1966
Eastern Conference Western Conference
------------------ ------------------
Atlanta Falcons * Baltimore Colts
Cleveland Browns Chicago Bears
Dallas Cowboys Detroit Lions
New York Giants Green Bay Packers
Philadelphia Eagles Los Angeles Rams
Pittsburgh Steelers Minnesota Vikings
St. Louis Cardinals San Francisco 49ers
Washington Redskins
Note:
Atlanta Falcons were added.
1967
Eastern Conference
Capitol Division Century Division
---------------- ----------------
Dallas Cowboys Cleveland Browns
New Orleans Saints * New York Giants
Philadelphia Eagles Pittsburgh Steelers
Washington Redskins St. Louis Cardinals
Western Conference
Central Division Coastal Division
---------------- ----------------
Chicago Bears Atlanta Falcons
Detroit Lions Baltimore Colts
Green Bay Packers Los Angeles Rams
Minnesota Vikings San Francisco 49ers
Note:
New Orleans Saints were added. League broken into four divisions
in two conferences.
1968
Eastern Conference
Capitol Division Century Division
---------------- ----------------
Dallas Cowboys Cleveland Browns
New York Giants New Orleans Saints
Philadelphia Eagles Pittsburgh Steelers
Washington Redskins St. Louis Cardinals
Western Conference
Central Division Coastal Division
---------------- ----------------
Chicago Bears Atlanta Falcons
Detroit Lions Baltimore Colts
Green Bay Packers Los Angeles Rams
Minnesota Vikings San Francisco 49ers
Note:
New York Giants and New Orleans Saints switched divisions.
1969
Eastern Conference
Capitol Division Century Division
---------------- ----------------
Dallas Cowboys Cleveland Browns
New Orleans Saints New York Giants
Philadelphia Eagles Pittsburgh Steelers
Washington Redskins St. Louis Cardinals
Western Conference
Central Division Coastal Division
---------------- ----------------
Chicago Bears Atlanta Falcons
Detroit Lions Baltimore Colts
Green Bay Packers Los Angeles Rams
Minnesota Vikings San Francisco 49ers
Note:
New York Giants and New Orleans Saints switched divisions again.
In 1970, the leagues (NFL, AFL) merged, and formed the two conference, three
division format that exists today.
In 1971, the Boston Patriots (AFC East) became the New England Patriots.
In 1976, the Seattle Seahawks were added to the NFC West, and the Tampa Bay
Buccaneers to the AFC West.
In 1977, Seattle was moved to the AFC West and Tampa Bay to the NFC Central.
That brings us up to the lastest expansion.
|
9.3919 | NFL screws Mamula; will probably put hit on nfl films | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 21 1995 14:00 | 12 |
| I'm peeved about Mike Mamula getting that big fine last week and now
injured (not related, just a double whammy). I saw the film and it
looked like he was coming in with his shoulder to Elway's body and
Elway ducked and the hit was shoulder(Mamula) to helmet.
I now have the impression that the NFL is using these fines as a form
of advertisement for the product - where else can they make newspapers
to market the violence of the game so cheaply.
It's like McDonalds and that phony coffee spill case where they got all
that free advertising for Mac's "steaming hot coffee" for what finally
was reduced two a few hundred thou.
|
9.3920 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Nov 21 1995 15:49 | 18 |
| > I'm peeved about Mike Mamula getting that big fine last week and now
> injured (not related, just a double whammy). I saw the film and it
> looked like he was coming in with his shoulder to Elway's body and
> Elway ducked and the hit was shoulder(Mamula) to helmet.
Every shot I saw of the hit (and I saw it live too), had Mamula's helmet
on Elway's helmet. Whether Elway ducked into it isn't the point...it's
that Mamula was leading with his helmet.
I think it's great that they're nailing these guys. The fines should be
even bigger, IMO. And let's start with the, "why don't they put dresses
on these guys" comments now. The big, brave DLs and LBs love to bring
that up, yet I haven't seen any standing there looking downfield while
250 lb guys are coming at 'em full-speed.
One analyst hit it on the head when he noted that Young, Aikman, Elway
and Favre were either out or went down on the same Sunday. These are
the guys the fans want to see.
|
9.3921 | happy to oblige | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Tue Nov 21 1995 15:56 | 4 |
| "why don't they put dresses on these guys"
billl
|
9.3922 | some ratings | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Nov 21 1995 16:08 | 8 |
|
Billte if you can get me Mamula's address I'll be happy to throw in
a few bucks towards the fine.........
Dresswearers: Elway, Aikman, Moon, Brown, Bledsoe, Marino, Hoss,
Randall, George
Hemen: Favre, Blake, Young, Kelly, Humphries, Brunell, O'Donnell
|
9.3923 | Went for the body, but Elway ducked | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | I have no answers | Tue Nov 21 1995 16:10 | 14 |
| I don't think there was anything wrong with the hit Mamula
put on Elway ... and neither did the refs, no penalty was
called on the play ... Elway just had the misfortune of getting
caught in a "lineman sandwhich" ... if Elway didn't leave
the game with an injury then the play would have been quickly
forgotten ... if anyone should be fined for that play it should
be the offensive line for poor pass protection :-) ...
On the other hand, I thought the hit that the Miami safety (not
Oliver, the one who lost his starting job) laid on Brent Jones
in the Monday Night Football game bordered on cheap shot ... he
blindsided Jones and led with his helmet ...
Vinny
|
9.3924 | Well it's 2 - 1 right now, anyone else? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 21 1995 16:10 | 12 |
| Well I'm probably biased but the film I saw had Mamula coming in with
his shoulder and Elway ducked down and in to him resulting in whatever
helmet activity there was. If Elway hadn't been moving out of the way
of the guy coming from the right side then Mamula would have simply
made a normal tackle - from what I've seen.
Anybody as "suspicious" as I am about NFL true motives? Since Joe sees
the same film with a different conclusion perhaps the NFL wasn't trying
to come up with their weekly quota of "hits". To show its sincerity I
expect NFL properties to immediately discontinue the sale of videos
depicting major hits on qbs and deleting same from the weekly feeds to
ESPN.
|
9.3925 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Nov 21 1995 16:22 | 11 |
|
let me see if I understand this right Billte, what you're saying is
he'll get fined caused he hit a prima donna but if he hit a bum
like Dave Brown nothing would be said? Speaking of Miami, one of em
layed a cheapshot Elvis too....
does anyone know why Brian Cox was so hot at his teammates after
getting burnt and who Merton Hanks wasd after?
Do you think if Miami continues to slide Shula will be asked to step
aside???????
|
9.3926 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 21 1995 16:31 | 7 |
| No I'm just saying that if the NFL is going to fine someone it should
be on a play with a lot less doubt than the Mamula one. Definetly I'd
say the "logic" was "Elway hurt, who can we fine? Rookie involved?
That's enough for me".
Now Mamula is getting millions but what happens if a 175k player makes
a hard, clean hit?
|
9.3927 | By your standards no conspiracy here, billte ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Never make it up to Coeur D'Alene | Tue Nov 21 1995 16:38 | 10 |
|
> Anybody as "suspicious" as I am about NFL true motives?
What suspicion? The NFL featured Chuck Cecil on its "Quarterback
Kills" video last year. Hell yes, your Dave Browns are considered
strictly stand-in material...
glenn
|
9.3928 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Tue Nov 21 1995 16:47 | 7 |
|
Needless to say none of us know. If Mamula was warned earlier in
the year for leading with his head. Most of the time players don't
get fined. For an incendent in which there is no prior history.
Ron
|
9.3929 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Wed Nov 22 1995 06:15 | 6 |
| Mamula's hit was fine. Elway moved right into it. Head is connected
to the shoulder and will be part of every stick made. Most
spears are shoulder tackles where the ballcarrier moves right into
the helmet path.
Jimbo
|
9.3930 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Wed Nov 22 1995 06:19 | 9 |
| But Mamula DIDN'T lead with his head!!!!
Like most of us, Mamula does have a head and it needs to be attached to
his shoulders when he makes a tackle. He would have hit Elway in the
ribs IF Fuller hadn't hit Elway a split second earlier and knocked him
down a bit. The fine is garbage and is being appealled. Anyone who has
seen the hit knows the fine is trash.
|
9.3931 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Nov 22 1995 08:50 | 13 |
| I've seen the film clip a couple of times.
Bullshit, pure and simple.
If it was Dave Brown, Tommy Maddox"Sux", Eric Kramer, Jim Everett or one of
those ilk, it would never have happened. But because it's Mr. Ed, the pansy
league fines Mamula.
The league should put dresses on these guys. (That's for whomever asked for it
to be said)
'Saw
|
9.3932 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Running down a dream | Wed Nov 22 1995 10:35 | 16 |
|
re 3922.
I'd like to see you take a hit blindside from some 290 lb Def. End and
get up. They have made rule to protect the players. If a player leads with
this head (aka spearing) he should be fined no matter who the other player
happens to be.
Lambert's dress wearing joke was funny at one time. I do not see the
humor myself. Having played QB and gotten my bell rung a time or two
it is not easy standing there trying to pass with all these apes
zeroing in on you knowing your going to get creamed in two or three
seconds.
|
9.3933 | But then I like fights in hockey games too.... | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Nov 22 1995 10:45 | 23 |
| >
> Lambert's dress wearing joke was funny at one time. I do not see the
> humor myself. Having played QB and gotten my bell rung a time or two
> it is not easy standing there trying to pass with all these apes
> zeroing in on you knowing your going to get creamed in two or three
> seconds.
>
If it was easy, we'd all be doing it, and these guys wouldn't be getting paid
mondo bucks to do it.
They know what they are getting into. YA Tittle, Bart Starr, Sonny Jurgenson,
Milt Plum, Sammy Baugh, et al, Fran Tarkenton, all were real men who played the
position -- hell, Fran scrambled to get away from it...
With that said, to me, a blatant intent to injure deserves a fine. Mamula was
NOT blatantly attempting to injure....
JMHO,
'Saw
|
9.3934 | They oughta just outlaw helmets! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Nov 22 1995 11:05 | 13 |
| > I'd like to see you take a hit blindside from some 290 lb
> Def. End and get up.
'Saw kinda hit the ol' nail on the head (no pun intended).
You give me a multi-million dollar contract and you'd be
suprised what physical harm I'd subject myself to.
We're not talking about over 40 computer geeks working
for peanuts here, going up against the likes of LT.
billl
|
9.3935 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Running down a dream | Wed Nov 22 1995 11:08 | 6 |
|
There not being paid mondo bucks to be speared by a defensive player
out to put them out of the game. Don't give me that bs he was not out
to hurt anyone either. Defensive players are paid to hurt the offense
and knock the offense's players out of the game. How many players on
offense are getting fined?
|
9.3936 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Nov 22 1995 11:12 | 25 |
| >
> There not being paid mondo bucks to be speared by a defensive player
> out to put them out of the game. Don't give me that bs he was not out
> to hurt anyone either. Defensive players are paid to hurt the offense
> and knock the offense's players out of the game. How many players on
> offense are getting fined?
>
They being paid the big bucks to play football. That includes all that is
inherent to the game.
The ONLY reason the NFL is protecting quarterbacks is because the QBs are a
draw, and if Aikman, Elway, Young and Farve aren't in the game, the ratings
will go down.
Before ratings became important they weren't protecting real men, like the
aformentioned QBs I listed....
Offense doens't get fined because they're not in the spotlight. I saw just as
many incidents this past weekend of offensive intent to injure with chop blocks
and leg whips, but they don't fined because those offenses are not
perpetrated on spotlight players.....
'Saw
|
9.3937 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Running down a dream | Wed Nov 22 1995 11:23 | 4 |
|
Spearing a player no matter what position he plays is not part of the
game.
|
9.3938 | put a dress on em' | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Wed Nov 22 1995 13:46 | 6 |
|
Sure could have fooled me the number of guys that do it. I also agree
with Saw that the chop-blocking is alot worst, alot more prevalaint
but totally ignored cause the players aren't primma donnas......
mike
|
9.3939 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Nov 22 1995 14:16 | 8 |
| Problem is that it seems to be just you, and whoever
levied the fine, consider it an intentional spear.
Everyone else appears to view it as a clean hit.
billl
|
9.3940 | Browns=Bengals | FABSIX::J_PAGE | | Wed Nov 22 1995 14:40 | 8 |
|
Listening to the radio at lunch today I heard a report saying that the
Bengals want to trade names with the Browns???? I guess so the Browns
would remain in Ohio but in Cin, and the Begal name would go to
Baltimore with the Clev. team. Making it the Cincinnati Browns and the
Baltimore Bengals.....Has anyone else heard this Rumor/story??
john
|
9.3941 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all... | Wed Nov 22 1995 15:10 | 8 |
| Nah, they don't want to do anything like that.
Afterall that would ruin, Groaner's plans to evolve
into a Steeler fan.
billl
|
9.3942 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Wed Nov 22 1995 15:14 | 10 |
|
According to Chris Mortensen, Cleveland is waging a pretty
strong (maybe even winnable) battle to keep the Browns. Un-
like when the the Raiders moved to LA, there is now a league
policy in place. Cleveland has done everything under the policy
to merit keeping the team and it's not likely that Tagliabue
will recommend for a move. Modell may not have the votes. Even
if he does have the votes or doesn't and moves anyways, he may
be opening a can of legal worms. Slim hopes for Clevelanders but
hopes nonetheless.
|
9.3943 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Nov 22 1995 15:25 | 1 |
9.3944 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Nov 22 1995 15:27 | 18 |
| Well, as far as I know the Federal Courts are not bound by the rules of the
NFL. Art Model was arguing in court the other day that being forced to stay in
Cleveland would be a financial hardship and he used for evidence the low fan
turnout last Sunday.
Now everyone will respond, "big deal it's your own fault" but it does suggest
that the City of Cleveland is claiming breach of contract to get the courts
to force the Browns to stay put. Problem is that the courts are reluctant to
enforce "specific performance" in the case of a breach which involves forcing
someone to live up to their end of the bargain. They are more likely to impose a
judgment against the defendant which in this case Baltimore will most likely
be happy to pay.
Davis set a precedent. Unless there is language in the opinion of that case
specifically geared toward NFL rules the precedent should apply and Cleveland
and the NFL will be stuck with nothing but legal bills trying to stop the move.
George
|
9.3945 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Nov 27 1995 08:37 | 5 |
| It was pretty cool seeing a Pittsburgh fan sitting next to a Cleveland fan,
both of whom were wearing orange arm-bands.
'Saw
|
9.3946 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Nov 27 1995 11:51 | 11 |
| >The ONLY reason the NFL is protecting quarterbacks is because the QBs are a
>draw, and if Aikman, Elway, Young and Farve aren't in the game, the ratings
>will go down.
Exactly right. And if the ratings go down, revenues will follow...and
so will the salaries of these head-hunters.
And 'Saw, how many of those brave QBs of yesteryear faced the kind of
pass-rushers of today (ie: 250-300 lbs, 4.7 40's, bench-pressing who-know-
what) ? I'm sure getting sacked by Alex Karras is a different experience
than being buried by Bruce Smith.
|
9.3947 | What Was The 49'ers Four Losses??? | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Mon Nov 27 1995 12:29 | 14 |
| I am trying to figure out a potential tiebreaker between the
Packers and 9'ers. Suppose (big if), they both end up at
12-4. I suppose one of the 1st tiebreakers is record within
the conference. The Pack would be at 12-4. What would the
49'ers be at? They so far have lost to:
Carolina
Detroit
New Orleans
Who is the 4th team? I hope its from the NFC! But, I kind of
think it might have been the Colts.
Tony
|
9.3948 | | LUDWIG::GARRY | | Mon Nov 27 1995 12:40 | 4 |
| the 49ers also lost to the Indy Colts....
Tom
|
9.3949 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Nov 27 1995 13:24 | 27 |
| >
>And 'Saw, how many of those brave QBs of yesteryear faced the kind of
>pass-rushers of today (ie: 250-300 lbs, 4.7 40's, bench-pressing who-know-
>what) ? I'm sure getting sacked by Alex Karras is a different experience
>than being buried by Bruce Smith.
>
Yes and no.
As the lineman have evolved, so have the QBs. How many QBs of yesteryear were
going 6'5" and 225? How many QBs of yesteryear were as mobile as the guys
today?
There comes a point where getting hit by a Big Daddy Lipscomb and a Bruce
Smith has to equal out -- at the point of oblivion.
I don't know who put the hit on YA Tittle that made him bleed, but you can bet
your bottom dollar that if Troy Boy bleeds today someone's going to get a
fine....
'Saw
|
9.3950 | Physics 101 | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Mon Nov 27 1995 13:31 | 15 |
| Bummer that it was the Colts! Green Bay would have to finish
with a better recrord then!
On rushers...
Force = Mass * Acceleration
I believe, on average, today's players are bigger than faster.
Quarterbacks might be bigger, but are there bones any harder???
On average, they must get hit with more force and its the force
that probably dictates extent of injury. (Either that or pressure
which is force per unit area or in other words takes into account
the amount of area that the force was applied to.)
Tony
|
9.3951 | Correction... | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Mon Nov 27 1995 13:32 | 3 |
| meant to say bigger AND faster
not bigger than faster...
|
9.3952 | Falcons sip | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Mon Nov 27 1995 13:39 | 14 |
| Not to digress, but leave it up to the dumba** Falcons to make Butty
look like an offensive genius. Over 500 total yards offense from a
team that only got 96 the week before against Carolina!
That thud that was centered around Atlanta at 7:45 pm last night was
the sound of everyone jumping off the bandwagon or changing their course
in mid jump.
Just think, Krieg passes for 413 yards, and the Falcons meet Marino
next week.
This team really sips.
UMDan
|
9.3953 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Nov 27 1995 14:03 | 5 |
| Hits are harder, but padding is better, and more for the QBs.
Tittle, Starr and Jurgenson never wore flack-jackets...
'Saw
|
9.3954 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Mon Nov 27 1995 15:39 | 6 |
| > Bummer that it was the Colts! Green Bay would have to finish
> with a better recrord then!
The first tie-breaker is record against common opponents, so the Pack
might still have a chance.
|
9.3955 | Nah...Still Doesn't Look Good | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Tue Nov 28 1995 09:07 | 13 |
| re: -1
I don't think so...
St Louis Rams:
49'ers 2-0
Packers 0-1
That was their first game and one they should have won, imo.
Tony
|
9.3956 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Nov 28 1995 11:54 | 10 |
|
Even NPR did a piece today on the new fines being levied by
the NFL. Included was an interview with Al Toon who retired due
to a series of concussions and still gets them today if he so
much as bumps his head. Also interviewed was Greg Lloyd who
pointed out the hypocrisy of the NFL fining players for vicious
hits and then selling those same hits on 'greatest hits' videos.
My take is that this is football. There's no room for dirty play
but a clean hit is a clean hit and if you can't it take then play
soccer or figure skate.
|
9.3957 | | ERICF::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Nov 28 1995 12:36 | 4 |
| Or better yet, play college basketball where every time anyone brushes
anyone else they blow whistles and everyone starts crying "he touched me".
George
|
9.3958 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Plan 9 From Outer Space | Tue Nov 28 1995 13:06 | 1 |
| See what I mean.
|
9.3959 | okay define strength - can't | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Nov 28 1995 13:23 | 10 |
| There was a time when contact was minimal in college basketball and a
high level of shooting and movement skills were a priority. But
contact gradually moved into the game to the point where, similar to
football, only those athletes with a high strength level could compete
in big time college baskets.
Even the women's game is slowly going the same route towards more and
more contact. I think for high level basketball that strength is more
a priority than even football although for simple bench pressing I
might take the latter.
|
9.3960 | Did Butty win? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Fri Dec 01 1995 11:12 | 4 |
| Who won last night? I got in from Albuquerque at about 1:30 am last
night and didn't even glance at the Sports page this morning.
UMDan
|
9.3962 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Dec 01 1995 11:40 | 11 |
| Yes, and it was BOOOOOORRRRRRIIIIIINNNNNGGGGGG...
Giants looked like sh*t and so did the Cards. The only reason the Giants won
was becuse they made less mistakes than the Cards -- and both teams made a lot
of mistakes.
Dave Brown looked like crap on all but one drive, and Krieg was impotent all
night....
'Saw
|
9.3963 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Dec 01 1995 11:55 | 1 |
9.3964 | Long season | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:05 | 12 |
| Yea, except that the Falcons made Butty and Kreig look like offensive
geniuses last week. And the 'Fins are up next.
This season in pro football really sips (IMO). I just can't seem to
get excited about it at all, what with a pre-ordained big game (NFC
Championship 49er-Cowboy), to be followed by the AFC sacrificial lamb
debacle.
Oh well, at least TDC and PBS still have on the cooking and home repair
shows....
UMDan
|
9.3965 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:12 | 12 |
| > Oh well, at least TDC and PBS still have on the cooking and home repair
> shows....
Catch Paul Prudhomme on PBS. He's massive, and I guess they told him lose
weight or else. So, he wrote this fat-free/reduced-fat cookbook of all these
typical Louisiana delicacies.
He's doing a series on it now -- it's amazing, and I've learned a lot from it.
Things you'd never think....like low fat jumbalaya and stuff like that!
'Saw
|
9.3966 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | Will work for sleep.. | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:21 | 4 |
| >Catch Paul Prudhomme on PBS. He's massive, and I guess they told him lose
>weight or else.
That's such crap! Never order food at a restaurant where the chef is thin!
|
9.3967 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:28 | 11 |
| | <<< Note 9.3966 by IMBETR::DUPREZ "Will work for sleep.." >>>
|
|>Catch Paul Prudhomme on PBS. He's massive, and I guess they told him lose
|>weight or else.
|
|That's such crap! Never order food at a restaurant where the chef is thin!
No, he was definitely in "I might not be able to get out my bedroom door"
mode. I mean massive, as in needing a crane to get him off the toilet....
|
9.3969 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:41 | 14 |
| > He does all of his cooking sitting down if you notice.
Yes. I had noticed that.
Actually, from what I've gathered he's lost some weight, but he's still pretty
big.....
I've grown to like that show.
'Saw
|
9.3970 | thanks for the warning | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:43 | 3 |
9.3971 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Dec 01 1995 12:47 | 3 |
| It's more interesting than the Dan Reeves-Butty Ryan show, that's for sure! 8^)
|
9.3972 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Fri Dec 01 1995 13:40 | 6 |
|
You know it was a boring game. When ESPN shows highlights of
about 6 incomplete passes. Just to extend the highlight segment so
it wasn't to short.
Ron
|
9.3973 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Dec 01 1995 14:21 | 3 |
| Since he has two out of three, perhaps this Prudhomme could play Nero
Wolfe in another go at the Rex Stout series. They made such a hash of
their attempt 15 years ago. Has he ever mentioned orchids on the show?
|
9.3974 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Dec 01 1995 14:36 | 21 |
| > their attempt 15 years ago. Has he ever mentioned orchids on the show?
No.
But he has mentioned:
crayfish pie
gumbo
jumbalaya
tasso
rice
seasonings
etc etc etc....
He'd be good, except he probably couldn't film ANY action scenes, unless they
had a stunt-double in a fat suit...8^)
|
9.3976 | O Sole Mio | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Dec 01 1995 14:51 | 8 |
| > And he uses apple juice to sweeten everything. I'd rather watch
> Maryanne Esposito cook italian.
Si, butta have-a you watched-a datta nice-a show, Biba Cooks Italian?
8^)
|
9.3977 | More food chatter | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Fri Dec 01 1995 15:11 | 12 |
| Biba's okay, The Frugal Gourmet is getting old but is still fun to
watch, and Julia Child is, ah, lets just say, interesting in a strange
sort of way (I still keep seeing in my mind a Julia Child take-off skit
done on SNL by Dan Ackroyd). Justin Wilson is hard to watch (IMO), and
I am subjected to Martha Stewart a little bit more than I care to be
'cause my wife likes to watch her.
Still prefer TOH, Hometime and the Furniture Guys though.
Great football talk, huh?
UMDan
|
9.3978 | try Too Many Cooks or Fer de Lance | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Dec 01 1995 15:14 | 9 |
| Nero never left the house, his exercise was darts and then later when
he got into shape, billiards. He had his gofer/agitator Archie do all
the leg work. His first dozen from '35-'50 were pretty good, later he
became pretty ordinary but the humor always saved these works.
It's amazing how television could take a work like that and simply
massacre it in trying to make it fit what sells to the 11 year old
audience that they write for. Not that 11 year olds watch, it's just
that whatever it is has to fit a 5th grade education.
|
9.3979 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Fri Dec 01 1995 15:18 | 51 |
| > Biba's okay,
Yep.
>The Frugal Gourmet is getting old but is still fun to
> watch,
Except when he get to babbling. He's started that lately (past 2-3 years)
>and Julia Child is, ah, lets just say, interesting in a strange
> sort of way (I still keep seeing in my mind a Julia Child take-off skit
> done on SNL by Dan Ackroyd).
The Katherine Hepburn (and I love Kate dearly) of cooking -- she gots the voice
and the shakes....
>Justin Wilson is hard to watch (IMO),
Yep.
> I am subjected to Martha Stewart a little bit more than I care to be
> 'cause my wife likes to watch her.
Dan, that's grounds for divorce. Martha Stewart is the most over-pretentious,
boring person on TV. No one gives dinner parties and crap like that, you've
got to be kidding me...
I almost laughed my ass off the day she was on Imus and Imus was asking her if
she was familiar with the Wilford Brimley Quaker Oatmeal method of stuffing a
turkey...
> Still prefer TOH, Hometime and the Furniture Guys though.
Yep. Furniture Guys ROOL....
Caught a re-run the other day were Ed says "Take a Mason jar" then he turns to
Joe L'Errerio and says "Joe, you have to take a Knights of Columbus jar". I
was rolling...
> Great football talk, huh?
Yeah, better than butty-ball....
|
9.3981 | Oh there are those M. Stewart types indeed | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Dec 01 1995 16:16 | 4 |
| I have a sister in law in East Grand Rapids who does everything exactly
like Martha Stewart: house, food presentations, the whole nine yards.
|
9.3982 | Another attempt to close the culture gap | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Clean living and a fast outfield | Mon Dec 04 1995 08:02 | 7 |
| The name Paul Prudhomme rings a definite bell. Where might I have seen
it or him?
Actually, a really strict moderator would have banned this to the Junk
Note. Of course, it was the moderator who started it... ;*)
Steve
|
9.3983 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Dec 04 1995 08:54 | 28 |
| >
>The name Paul Prudhomme rings a definite bell. Where might I have seen
>it or him?
>
He's a chef from Louisiana (prolly Nawlins) who does a lot of traditional
Louisiana cooking -- it might be cajun but I'm not really sure what all cajun
cookin' encompasses.
He's written cookbooks and done TV shows and stuff, and he was/is REALLY
HEAVY.
>Actually, a really strict moderator would have banned this to the Junk
>Note. Of course, it was the moderator who started it... ;*)
This is true, but the junk note was being consumed by the "how many fans can
dance on the head of a pin" debate.....
Tommy, agreed about Ed's jokes -- it's like someone who uses TOO much pepper in
their cooking. Past a certain amount, it just hides the rest of the flavors.
'Saw
|
9.3984 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Mon Dec 04 1995 09:35 | 25 |
| Getting back on track:
o Any day that Dallas loses is a good day. Switzer doesn't have
the touch with the Cowboys that Johnson had, and I have a feeling
the Jerry Jones mistake is going to come to the fore over the
next couple of seasons.
o The San Francisco-Buffalo game last night was very enjoyable.
I thought it was a pretty good slug-fest and the line matchups
were great. Lots and lots and lots of battling going on in the
pit last night. My man Harris Barton just keeps getting it
done...
o Green Bay is all alone atop the NFC Central, a spot that they've
not been in alone in December since 1972, my freshman year of
High School....
o Oakland is not the same team when Hostetler is not at the helm....
'Saw
|
9.3985 | Falcons tailspin | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Mon Dec 04 1995 09:50 | 14 |
| Well, that empty wagon circling the Perimeter here in Atlanta is the
bandwagon that was formerly occupied by the folks who were rootin' for
the Falcons (all 2 of them). First Butty "The offensive genius" Ryan
game, then the June "I suck as a coach" Jones game (he just about
admitted as much in the post game press conference) against the Fins.
I really would like to try and root for this team, but they are making
sure that I and any other hopeful fans abandon them in droves. They play
NO, then Carolina, then SF on Christmas Eve. They could be 7-9 to end the
season. Man they sip.
At least the 'Skins won.
UMDan
|
9.3986 | 1972 Packers | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Mon Dec 04 1995 14:14 | 10 |
| Green Bay in 1972 - John Brockington and MacArthur Lane (whose
autograph I got that year). Too bad they didn't have a QB. They
played the Redskins in the playoffs and I believe lost 16-3.
The Redskins stacked something like 8 or 9 guys at the line the
entire game. The Pack was being forced to throw and thats something
they really couldn't do!!!
I was one year away from my freshman year.
Tony
|
9.3987 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Dec 04 1995 14:17 | 3 |
9.3988 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Ain't this boogie a mess | Mon Dec 04 1995 14:51 | 2 |
|
I did'nt know Brockington went to Oklahoma State. /;^)>
|
9.3989 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Dec 04 1995 15:03 | 6 |
|
Did he have the same type of brilliant NFL career that Archie Griffin
had.
Jerry
|
9.3990 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Tue Dec 05 1995 09:00 | 5 |
| I remember a Redskin player stripping the ball from one of the Packers.
It was the first time I'd ever seen that in an NFL game.
I remember the Pack's one FG -- I think it was Chester Marcol kicking, but I
could be wrong.... That's getting to be a long time ago now, I guess.
|
9.3991 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Tue Dec 05 1995 09:45 | 7 |
| > I remember the Pack's one FG -- I think it was Chester Marcol kicking, but I
> could be wrong.... That's getting to be a long time ago now, I guess.
Yup, it was Chester Marcol - he had a great season in 1972. I thought
the Packers would actually win that game (Washington had not played well in
the final 3 games of the regular season), but the Redksins stepped up a level
against Green Bay and Dallas, plus Scott Hunter was a rather poor QB.
|
9.3992 | More Musings... | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Wed Dec 06 1995 11:59 | 10 |
| One thing that made the Pack look ok was how good the Skins
fared the rest of the way. They slaughtered Dallas and lost
a fairly close SB game to that undefeated Miami team.
Boy, good memory on that strip (I have no memory of it).
That was one heck of a pair of horses in the backfield at that
time. If Hunter was a good QB...
Tony
|
9.3993 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Wed Dec 06 1995 12:03 | 4 |
| > That was one heck of a pair of horses in the backfield at that
> time. If Hunter was a good QB...
Ain't THAT the truth!
|
9.3994 | Watch Those Lions!!! | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Wed Dec 06 1995 13:34 | 22 |
| Getting back to the present, would anyone want to play the
Lions in the playoffs? The paper credited their defensive
effort against the Bears to their finally getting accustomed
to the 4-3. I guess Kramer was hit more so than in any other
game. They amassed less than 200 yards total offense and they
are like 1st or 2nd in the league offensively. Detroit got
over 400 yards.
Meanwhile, you've got a QB that can be hot, one of the best
WR's in Herman Moore, a fine underrated Perriman, and of course
Barry Sanders.
The Lions started off 0-3. They are now 7-6 meaning 7-3 in the
last ten games as well as 4-0 for the last 4.
If I was to be my most pessimistic self, I would predict Green
Bay just missing out on a 1st round bye and having Detroit at
GB for their first playoff game - and losing!
I wouldn't want to face those Lions!
Tony
|
9.3995 | Officially only 3 teams in each Division are out | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 06 1995 13:45 | 10 |
| Detroit AT Green Bay is a no Brainer put your money on GB...
Detroit is not the same on grass. There 7-3 over there last
10, I don't know which one's they won/lost but 7 or there last
10 games were in DOMES. 3 of there last 4 were at home.
The LAST team the Lions should want to face in rnd 1 would be
the Packers. I think Detroit will travel to Philly in the 1st
round and either Minny or Atlanta in Green Bay.
MaB
|
9.3996 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Dec 06 1995 16:36 | 15 |
| >plus Scott Hunter was a rather poor QB.
Are you guys sure Hunter was the QB in that game ?
Re: Brockington and Griffin
Brockington had a much better career. He got 1,000 in each of his first
3 (or was it 4 ?) years, when they played just 14 games. I believe only
Jim Brown had done that previously .
BTW, GB played Washington, at RFK, during the regular season and I believe
lost 16-13, or 16-10...I not have the score correct, but it was a close
game and the Pack did get a TD.
|
9.3997 | It Was Hunter | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Thu Dec 07 1995 08:18 | 6 |
| I know it was Scott Hunter. I still remember the Monday night
24-23 thriller over the Lions that year. The Pack was down
something like 23-7 and came back. Hunter never had a better
game.
Tony
|
9.3998 | Green Bay is clearly the best in Central | ACISS1::WIERSBECK | I sweat Mickey Mouse | Thu Dec 07 1995 08:46 | 9 |
| Actually, I wouldn't mind my Vikes taking on Detroit again. We beat
them the first time around, then lost a wild one on Thanksgiving.
Unfortunately, two Vikes TD's were called back, but they still nearly
overcame that to win in Pontiac.
Fontes will find a way to screw up.
Spud
|
9.3999 | | CAM::WAY | Nine to the front, six to the rear | Thu Dec 07 1995 09:00 | 6 |
| Hey Spud,
How goes it? Talk to MrT at all lately????
'Saw
|
9.4000 | snarf - this is my golf score :^) | LANDO::FARLEY | | Thu Dec 07 1995 09:53 | 1 |
|
|
9.4001 | Or putt-putt | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Thu Dec 07 1995 10:02 | 11 |
| > <<< Note 9.4000 by LANDO::FARLEY >>>
> -< snarf - this is my golf score :^) >-
>
Only for the front nine Kev. :-)
Welcome back!
Kevin
|
9.4002 | one less team to worry 'bout | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Thu Dec 07 1995 10:38 | 3 |
| > Fontes will find a way to screw up.
Yeah, I'm hoping he saves his job.
|
9.4003 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Dec 11 1995 13:35 | 6 |
| One boring weekend of televised NFL games in the greater-Boston area.
Min-Cle, Ari-SD, NE-Jets, Gia-Was and GB-TB. YECH ! Can't do anything
about pre-season scheduling of the Saturday games, but I hate the NFL's
home-team protection rule which mandates that we see only the Patriots
in the 1pm slot (when they're home), AND blows away the NBC double-header,
forcing FOX' Gia-Was alternative at 4pm.
|
9.4004 | Playoff teams schedules | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Mon Dec 11 1995 13:39 | 24 |
| Remaining schedule of probabl playoff teams.
Kansas City* 11- 2-0 vs Denver vs Seattle
Pittsburgh 10- 4-0 vs New England at Green Bay
Buffalo 9- 5-0 vs Miami vs Buffalo
Indianapolis 8- 6-0 vs San Diego vs New England
Oakland 8- 6-0 at Seattle vs Denver
Miami* 7- 6-0 at Buffalo at St Louis
San Diego 7- 7-0 vs Indianapolis vs NY Giants
Seattle 7- 7-0 vs Oakland at Kansas City
Denver 7- 7-0 at Kansas City at Oakland
*Kansas City plays at Miami tonight
San Francisco 10- 4-0 vs Minnesota at Atlanta
Dallas 10- 4-0 vs NY Giants at Arizona
Philadelphia 9- 5-0 vs Arizona at Chicago
Green Bay 9- 5-0 at New Orleans vs Pittsburgh
Detroit 8- 6-0 vs Jacksonville at Tampa Bay
Minnesota 8- 6-0 at San Francisco at Cincinnati
Atlanta 8- 6-0 at Carolina vs San Francisco
Chicago 7- 7-0 vs Tampa Bay vs Philadelphia
Tampa Bay 7- 7-0 at Chicago vs Detroit
St Louis 7- 7-0 vs Washington vs Miami
|
9.4005 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Mon Dec 11 1995 15:11 | 5 |
|
Who is Buffalo playing in the last week? They can't be playing
themselves. :^)
Ron
|
9.4006 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Mon Dec 11 1995 17:50 | 21 |
|
In looking at the schedules and records. I see KC, Pittsburgh, and
Buffalo winning the divisions. Miami must win tonight or I see an 8-8
team making the playoffs in the AFC.
Oakland/KC combination will give Denver/Seattle an 8th loss.
Possible the Raiders with 8 losses. Anyways only 1 team out of Denver/
Seattle/Oakland will have 9 wins. So give a wildcard to the AFC West. Which
leaves us 2 spots.
If Miami loses tonight. The Patriots still have a chance. It all
depends on this week. With a Miami loss tonight, I only see two things
needing to occur for the Patriots to make the playoffs. 1) They must
win both games. 2) Buffalo beats Miami or St Louis beats Miami.
Reason being is with the Patriots winning out. Plus, Miami losing
2 out of three. There will be 2 teams with 9 wins or better. One in
the AFC West. With the other being in the AFC East or West. Which
leaves the last spot to an 8-8 team. Since there will be 3, 4, or 5
teams tied at 8-8. The Patriots get the playoff spot. Based on the
best conference record. The Patriots would be 8-4 in the AFC. With
everybody else having at least 5 AFC loses.
Ron
|
9.4007 | Ramblin' | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Tue Dec 12 1995 09:02 | 14 |
| Sort of hard to figure out how the season will end up this year. The
two supposed dominant teams, SF and Dallas have looked mortal at times
(Dallas recently, SF earlier), though 'Frisco looks like they are
getting their act together in time for the playoffs. Dallas could
still be there despite Switzer.
The AFC looks less defined, though the Steelers look tough of late, and
the Raiders and KC have stumbled. Can't believe that the Bills may
actually make it to the big dance again!
Maybe, just maybe the SB will actually be competitive and close this
year. Wonder how much attention a GB - Buffalo SB would attract?
UMDan
|
9.4008 | neon in the nimbus nemesis | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Dec 12 1995 11:20 | 4 |
| The way the mind of these athletes work the Switzer blunder followed by
his defense by the team followed by the universal attacks by the media
should work to benefit of the cowboys as they now circle the wagons and
Barry preaches them vs us one of the new coach's favorite techniques.
|
9.4009 | corrected rest o' schedule | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Dec 12 1995 11:47 | 24 |
| Remaining schedule of probabl playoff teams.
Kansas City 11- 3-0 vs Denver vs Seattle
Pittsburgh 10- 4-0 vs New England at Green Bay
Buffalo 9- 5-0 vs Miami vs Houston
Indianapolis 8- 6-0 vs San Diego vs New England
Miami 8- 6-0 at Buffalo at St Louis
Oakland 8- 6-0 at Seattle vs Denver
San Diego 7- 7-0 at Indianapolis at NY Giants
Seattle 7- 7-0 vs Oakland at Kansas City
Denver 7- 7-0 at Kansas City at Oakland
San Francisco 10- 4-0 vs Minnesota at Atlanta
Dallas 10- 4-0 vs NY Giants at Arizona
Philadelphia 9- 5-0 vs Arizona at Chicago
Green Bay 9- 5-0 at New Orleans vs Pittsburgh
Detroit 8- 6-0 vs Jacksonville at Tampa Bay
Minnesota 8- 6-0 at San Francisco at Cincinnati
Atlanta 8- 6-0 at Carolina vs San Francisco
Chicago 7- 7-0 vs Tampa Bay vs Philadelphia
Tampa Bay 7- 7-0 at Chicago vs Detroit
St Louis 7- 7-0 vs Washington vs Miami
TTom
|
9.4010 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Tue Dec 12 1995 16:53 | 22 |
| San Francisco 10- 4-0 vs Minnesota at Atlanta
Dallas 10- 4-0 vs NY Giants at Arizona
Philadelphia 9- 5-0 vs Arizona at Chicago
Green Bay 9- 5-0 at New Orleans vs Pittsburgh
Detroit 8- 6-0 vs Jacksonville at Tampa Bay
Minnesota 8- 6-0 at San Francisco at Cincinnati
Atlanta 8- 6-0 at Carolina vs San Francisco
Chicago 7- 7-0 vs Tampa Bay vs Philadelphia
Tampa Bay 7- 7-0 at Chicago vs Detroit
St Louis 7- 7-0 vs Washington vs Miami
TTom
This week: SF over Minny, Jax over Detroit, Carolina over Atlanta,
Chicago over Tampa Bay, Washington over St.Louis
Next Week: TB over Detroit, Cinci over Minny, SF over Atlanta,
Philly over Chicago, TB over Detroit, Carolina over Washington.
My question, under this scenario, there is a 7-way-tie between Detroit,
Minnesota, Atlanta, Chicago, Tampa Bay, and Carolina, with St.Louis as
a possible 7th team in the tie. Can Carolina make the playoffs ?
|
9.4011 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Wed Dec 13 1995 14:53 | 8 |
|
I believe (not certain) that under your scenerio, Carolina will not go
because of tie-breakers. Of the seven teams, the two with the best
Conference record will go to the playoffs. I don't think Carolina
would be that team.
Marc
|
9.4012 | a great one goes down | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | My python boot is to tight | Wed Dec 13 1995 17:29 | 5 |
|
Word from the football notesfile indicates that Green Bay's Reggie
White is out for the season. He will go under the knife for a torn
hamstring in the area of his right knee. His age will be a problem
for his return next year. At 34 this will be a tough rehab.
|
9.4013 | not good enough | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Thu Dec 14 1995 10:38 | 5 |
| Carolina is elimintated by their conference record. They can finish 8-8
which is good enough for some teams but the Painters lose all the tie
breakers.
TTom
|
9.4014 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Mon Dec 18 1995 10:51 | 21 |
| So, can anyone inform me as to who has what advantages in the
wild card race ?
Here's my understanding:
First, divisions standings are set. First tie-breaker is head-to-head,
next division records, next common opponents, next conference records,
and finally net points.
Then, teams in different divisions with the same records and eligible
for a wild card spot are compared. That is, suppose Chicago, Minnesota,
and Atlanta all end up 8-8 in the battle for WC spot #3. Chicago
and Minnesota are compared, and Chicago ends up with a better division
record than Minnesota (I'm not sure that is the case; just an example).
Then Chicago and Atlanta are compared, and Chicago wins based on
records versus common opponents.
So, with that in mind, how do the AFC and NFC races stack up ?
[Having clinched playoff spots: SF, Dallas, GB, Philadelphia, Buffalo,
Pittsburgh, KC]
|
9.4015 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Dec 18 1995 11:00 | 6 |
| Last I looked the tie breakers for division title and wild card spot were
a bit different. For example tie breakers for division title consider record in
the division fairly high up. Tie breakers for wild card do not consider
division record record at all and consider conference record fairly high up.
George
|
9.4016 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Mon Dec 18 1995 11:05 | 17 |
| > Last I looked the tie breakers for division title and wild card spot were
>a bit different. For example tie breakers for division title consider record in
>the division fairly high up. Tie breakers for wild card do not consider
>division record record at all and consider conference record fairly high up.
The divisional and wild card tie-breaker rules were changed slightly last
year. Prior to last year, you could have had the following scenario:
Teams tied for wild card spots 2+3, all with 9-7 records, 2 are in division A
and 1 in division B:
Team 1, Division A, division record 4-4, conference mark 7-5
Team 2, Division A, division record 5-3, conference mark 6-6
Team 3, Division B, division record 4-4, conference mark 7-5.
Prior to last year, teams 1 and 3 would go to the playoffs. Beginning
with last year, teams 2 and 3 would go to the playoffs.
|
9.4017 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Mon Dec 18 1995 21:39 | 80 |
| The possibilities for the NFL playoffs through Sunday, Dec. 17, according to
the league:
AFC EAST
Buffalo: Clinched division title and will host a wild-card round game.
Indianapolis: Can clinch a wild-card spot with a victory, or a Seattle loss
and either a Miami loss or an Oakland loss.
Miami: Can clinch a wild-card spot with a victory and one of the following:
An Indianapolis loss or tie; a San Diego loss or tie; an Oakland loss or tie; or
a Seattle victory; or three of the following: An Indianapolis loss; a San Diego
loss; an Oakland loss; and a Seattle loss.
AFC CENTRAL
Pittsburgh: Clinched division title and first-round bye. Can clinch
home-field advantage throughout the AFC playoffs with a victory and a
Kansas City loss.
AFC WEST
Kansas City: Clinched division title and first-round bye. Can clinch
home-field advantage throughout playoffs with a victory or tie or a
Pittsburgh loss or tie.
Oakland: Can clinch a wild-card spot with a victory and either a Seattle
loss or any two of the following: An Indianapolis loss, a Miami loss and a
San Diego loss.
San Diego: Can clinch wild-card spot with a victory or either an Oakland
loss and a Seattle loss or an Indianapolis loss and either a Miami loss or a
Seattle loss.
Seattle: Can clinch wild-card spot with a victory and any of the following:
An Indianapolis loss or tie; a Miami loss or tie; or a San Diego loss or tie.
Denver: Can clinch wild-card spot with a victory and an Indianapolis loss
and a Seattle victory and either a Miami loss or a San Diego loss.
NFC EAST
Dallas: Clinched playoff spot. Can clinch division title and first-round bye
with a victory or tie or a Philadelphia loss or tie. Can clinch home-field
advantage throughout the NFC playoffs with either a victory or tie and a San
Francisco loss in either of its final two games or with a Philadelphia loss or
tie and two San Francisco losses.
Philadelphia: Clinched playoff spot. Can clinch division title and
first-round bye with a victory and a Dallas loss. Can clinch home-field
advantage throughout the playoffs with a victory and a Dallas loss and a San
Francisco loss in either of its final two games.
NFC CENTRAL
Green Bay: Clinched playoff spot. Can clinch division title with victory or
tie or a Detroit loss or tie. Can clinch first-round bye with a victory and two
San Francisco losses.
Detroit: Can clinch playoff spot with a victory or tie or a Minnesota loss in
either of its last two games or an Atlanta loss or tie. Can clinch division
title with a victory and a Green Bay loss. Can clinch a first-round bye with a
victory and two San Francisco losses and a Green Bay loss.
Minnesota: Can clinch a playoff spot with two victories or one victory and a
Chicago loss or tie and an Atlanta loss or tie.
Chicago: Can clinch a playoff spot with a victory and a Minnesota loss in
either of its last two games and an Atlanta loss or tie.
NFC WEST
San Francisco: Clinched division title. Can clinch first-round bye with one
victory or a Green Bay loss and a Detroit loss. Can clinch home-field
advantage throughout the NFC playoffs with two victories or one victory
and a Dallas loss and a Philadelphia loss or tie.
Atlanta: Can clinch a playoff spot with a victory and either a Minnesota loss
or a Detroit loss or two Minnesota losses and a Chicago loss and a St. Louis
loss.
St. Louis: Can clinch a playoff spot with a victory and two Minnesota losses
and a Chicago loss and an Atlanta loss.
|
9.4018 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Mon Dec 18 1995 21:45 | 9 |
| Given the previous scenario, I would guess that the playoffs are
likely to have:
San Fransisco 12-4 Kansas City 13-3
Dallas 12-4 Pittsburgh 11-5
Green Bay 11-5 Buffalo 11-5
Philadelphia 11-5 San Diego 9-7
Detroit 10-6 Indianapolis 9-7
Minnesota 9-7 Oakland 9-7
|
9.4019 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Dec 19 1995 08:20 | 13 |
|
I feel Seattle is more likely than Oakland. Both Seattle
(at KC) and Oakland (Denver) need to win.
Sure Seattle is away, but they only need one other loss
by Miami, SD, or Indy. Oakland (choooooke) needs
either Seattle to lose or 2 other losses.
Is Mirer out for good this year? I know he's injured now, but
at least they benched him to straighten his head out when it was
warranted (unlike Drew who was left in to fester away)...
- Sean
|
9.4020 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Tue Dec 19 1995 10:55 | 2 |
| But Seattle needs to win at K.C. (Chiefs are 7-0 in the AFC West),
while Oakland plays Denver at home.
|
9.4021 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Dec 19 1995 12:25 | 3 |
|
But it's that special time of the year for Marty :^)
|
9.4022 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Dec 19 1995 12:25 | 7 |
|
As a Raider fan, this weekend I was dreading the Seahawks. They are a
MUCH better team than the record indicates. They got off to a slow
start, but have steamrolled over teams lately.
Marc
|
9.4023 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Dec 19 1995 12:37 | 1 |
9.4024 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Tue Dec 19 1995 13:52 | 8 |
| Hard to believe there's been no comment in here
on the spittle-spewing Brian Cox's tirade after he
was ejected. This is the best the 'phins can come
up with for a NFL Man of the Year nominee?
billl
|
9.4025 | Rules for NFL Tiebreaker | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Dec 19 1995 13:53 | 185 |
| Did they change the procedure from last year? From this I gather that if
multiple teams are tied that they first use the division tb rules and
the survivor of that then compares with the "top seed" of the other
divisions. Once a team makes the tiebreaker then the whole thing
starts again. There are procedures prior to "seeding". Last year I'd
gather that four teams from nfl central wouldn't have made it to the
wildcard/playoffs.
Rules follow
Tiebreaking procedures for NFL playoffs
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following procedures will be used to break ties for playoff
berths and to determine regular- season schedules for next season:
To break a tie within a division
If, at the end of the regular season, two or more clubs in the same
division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the
following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.
Two clubs
1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the
clubs).
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
conference.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, if applicable.
5. Best net points in division games.
6. Best net points in all games.
7. Strength of schedule.
8. Best net touchdowns in all games.
9. Coin toss.
Three or more clubs
(Note: If two clubs remain tied after a third or other clubs are
eliminated during any step, tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of the
two-club format.)
1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games among the
clubs).
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
conference.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, if applicable.
5. Best net points in division games.
6. Best net points in all games.
7. Strength of schedule.
8. Best net touchdowns in all games.
9. Coin toss.
To break a tie for the wild-card team
If it is necessary to break ties to determine the three wild-card
clubs from each conference, the following steps will be taken.
1. If the tied clubs are from the same division, apply division
tiebreaker.
2. If the tied clubs are from difference divisions, apply the
following steps.
Two clubs
1. Head-to-head, if applicable.
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
conference.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
4. Best average net points in conference games.
5. Best net points in all games.
6. Strength of schedule.
7. Best net touchdowns in all games.
8. Coin toss.
Three or more clubs
(Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are
eliminated, tiebreaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-club
format).
1. Apply division tiebreaker to eliminate all but the highest-ranked
club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original
seeding within a division upon application of the division
tiebreaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the
procedure that are necessary to identify the three wild-card
participants.
2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated
each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others).
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the
conference.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four.
5. Best average net points in conference games.
6. Best net points in all games.
7. Strength of schedule.
8. Best net touchdowns in all games.
9. Coin toss.
When the first wild-card team has been identified, the procedure is
repeated to name the second wild card, i.e., eliminate all but the
highest-ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2,
and repeated a third time, if necessary, to identify the third wild
card. In situations where three or more teams from the same division
are involved in the procedure, the original seeding of the teams
remains the same for subsequent applications of the tiebreaker if
the top-ranked team in that division qualifies for a wild-card
berth.
Other tie-breaking procedures
Only one club advances to the playoffs in any tiebreaking step.
Remaining tied clubs revert to the first step of the applicable
division or wild-card tiebreakers. As an example, if two clubs
remain tied in any tiebreaker step after all other clubs have been
eliminated, the procedure reverts to step 1 or the two-club format
to determine the winner. When one club wins the tie-breaker, all
other clubs revert to step 1 of the applicable two-club or
three-club format.
2. In comparing division and conference records or records against
common opponents among tied teams, the best won-lost-tied percentage
is the deciding factor since teams might have played an unequal
number of games.
3. To determine home-field priority among division titlists, apply
wild-card tiebreakers.
4. To determine home-field priority for wild-card qualifiers, apply
division tiebreakers (if teams are from the same division) or
wild-card tiebreakers (if teams are from different divisions).
Tiebreaking procedure for meeting selection
If two or more clubs are tied in the selection order, the
strength-of-schedule tiebreaker is applied, subject to the following
exceptions for playoff clubs:
1. The Super Bowl winner is last and the Super Bowl loser
next-to-last.
2. Any non-Super Bowl playoff club involved in a tie shall be
assigned priority within its segment below that of non-playoff clubs
and in the order that the playoff clubs exited from the playoffs.
Thus, within a tied segment a playoff club that loses in the
wild-card game will have priority over a playoff club that loses in
the divisional playoff game, which in turn will have priority over a
club that loses in the conference championship game. If two tied
clubs exited the playoffs in the same round, the tie is broken by
strength-of-schedule.
If any ties cannot be broken by strength-of-schedule, the divisional
or conference tie-breakers, whichever are applicable, are applied.
Any ties that still exist are broken by a coin flip.
|
9.4026 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Tue Dec 19 1995 13:55 | 7 |
| re -.1:
Not bad for right off the top of the noggin, Sen-sei.
billl
|
9.4027 | truer words were never spoken | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Tue Dec 19 1995 14:44 | 10 |
| favorite quote off the internet:
"In the second quarter of the Cowboys' 21-20 win, Brown
scrambled by the flailing Sanders, who gets about 35 cents
for his tackling and $34,999,999.65 for the rest of his game."
billl
|
9.4028 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Dec 19 1995 14:51 | 11 |
| Well Sanders seems to be pretty effective even if he doesn't make tackles.
Football is a very specialized game and there are lots of players who have some
talents but not others. Kickers can't run that well, runners don't pass that
well QBs don't normally kick that well.
The question is, do the guys he's covering gain more or less yardage when
being covered by Sanders than they do when being covered by someone else? I've
got to believe someone feels that they gain less or he wouldn't get paid the
money he gets.
George
|
9.4029 | pay for performance is alive and well | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Tue Dec 19 1995 14:56 | 7 |
| ...and everyone is paid ONLY according to their ability.
right!
billl
|
9.4030 | Please no more LDUC | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Dec 19 1995 15:27 | 5 |
|
re -.2
I would just like to ask all of sports not to respond to that.
|
9.4031 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Dec 19 1995 15:35 | 1 |
9.4032 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Tue Dec 19 1995 15:48 | 6 |
| Go to 251.82 and run the program. Or bang your head into a wall a
couple hundred times.
HTH
UMDan
|
9.4033 | A Helluva Prognosticeer | AKOCOA::BREEN | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust | Tue Dec 26 1995 15:26 | 7 |
| My congratulations to the heroic Ms Karen Derry for winning da pool-95,
in a two-peat. She was all but buried and the obits mentioned the C
word and she came back with 12 out of 15 to bury, among others, Ttom.
For those interested or perhaps having dropped out when the going got
to tough, we now have the playoff pool.
Then we'll combine them all.
|
9.4034 | in case you were wondering | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Dec 29 1995 11:41 | 11 |
| I just scanned the "Season long over/under contest"
in Pool_95. Couldn't help but notice that the BIG
disappointments for 1995 are New England, Cleveland,
Arizona and the Jets, all tied at -5.
The winner of the over-acheiver award goes to KC
for finishing +5, with Carolina hot on their tail
at +4.
billl
|
9.4035 | pimento is better | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Dec 29 1995 11:48 | 39 |
| Cleveland is going to make a lot of all-disappointing in 95 sprots lists.
Personally, I have a great memento of their demise, a ticket from Vegas
for them to win the whole thang. It woulda payed a lousy 7-1 anyway. I'll
prolly frame it.
Team Line Wins O/U by
-----------------------------------------------------
San Francisco 12.5 11 Under -2
Dallas 11.5 12 Over 0
Miami 10.5 9 Under -2
Pittsburgh 10.5 11 Over 0
New England 10.5 6 Under -5
Cleveland 9.5 5 Under -5
Oakland 9.5 8 Under -2
San Diego 9.5 9 Under -1
Denver 8.5 8 Under -1
Chicago 8.5 9 Over 0
Detroit 8.5 10 Over 1
Buffalo 8.5 10 Over 1
Minnesota 8.5 8 Under -1
Green Bay 8.5 11 Over 2
NY Giants 8.5 5 Under -4
Arizona 8.5 4 Under -5
Philadelphia 8.5 10 Over 1
Kansas City 7.5 13 Over 5
Indianapolis 7.5 9 Over 1
Seattle 7.5 8 Over 0
Atlanta 7.5 9 Over 1
NY Jets 7.5 3 Under -5
New Orleans 7.5 7 Under -1
Tampa Bay 6.5 7 Over 0
Washington 6.5 6 Under -1
Cincinnati 5.5 7 Over 1
St Louis 5.5 7 Over 1
Houston 5.5 7 Over 1
Carolina 2.5 7 Over 4
Jacksonville 2.5 4 Over 1
|
9.4036 | did Karen win that too? | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Dec 29 1995 11:48 | 7 |
| Just to set the record straight I finished ABOVE the
"UMDanbillline" in the aforementioned contest with
an amazing 16-14 in the O/U and a stellar 18-12 in the
"will they make the 'offs" catagory.
billl
|
9.4038 | way too go | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Dec 29 1995 12:00 | 8 |
| > Mikey won thised one.
So he says.
As the semi-proud sponsor of thised event, I'll defer to any and all
corrections ;-).
TTom
|
9.4039 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Dec 29 1995 12:20 | 5 |
| I'll probably regret this, but, is there any chance
of getting the results of said contest poste?
billl
|
9.4040 | da POOL | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Dec 29 1995 12:44 | 10 |
| Along the way today, we posted about ever thang we talked about like POOL
results, bowl results, etc.
And on about ever one of those thangs ol' billl's been a little outta
sync.
Mikey did the cyphering over in POOL for thised one. Ever thang else is
over there, too, either, both, yet.
TTom
|
9.4041 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Dec 29 1995 12:52 | 8 |
| Well, excuuuuuuse me! Could someone maybe provide
a pointer to the results of the nfl o/u contest
over in Pool_95? This hapless fool can only seem
to find the cumulative results of the pickees, but
no mention of how the pickers did.
billl
|
9.4042 | Nontechnoweenie needs help | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass is #1 - again!!! | Fri Dec 29 1995 13:08 | 4 |
| Can someone give me a pointer to POOL itself? Like, let me hit KP7 and
have it magically appear or somethin'?
NAZZ
|
9.4043 | and the results are... | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Dec 29 1995 13:39 | 58 |
| billl,
here's about ever thang I could come up with. put it together with a
little smiley and you got yourself a real package...
My confusion comes from the fack that you replied to it but what the hey.
<<< HBAHBA::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]POOL_95.NOTE;1 >>>
-< POOL 95 >-
================================================================================
Note 7.39 Miscellaneous Comments 39 of 41
CNTROL::CHILDS "Washing Machine" 27 lines 28-DEC-1995 12:46
-< over and under results >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I couldn't post this in the season long over and under note
but here's the unofficial results. A real runaway. Wish I went to
Vegas..........
Player over/under playoffs
-------------------------------------------------------
Childs 23 .766 9 .750
Neuzil 19 .633 7 .583
Dudek 18 .600 8 .666
Breen 17 .566 8 .666
Huber 16 .533 8 .666
Derry 16 .533 8 .666
Garry 16 .533 7 .583
Brule 16 .533 6 .500
Haas 15 .500 8 .666
Nazz 15 .500 8 .666
Zogran 15 .500 6 .500
Long 15 .500 6 .500
Mendez 14 .466 7 .583
Heath 14 .466 6 .500
Chappy 13 .433 8 .666
Erickson 13 .433 7 .583
Cadzilla 13 .433 5 .416
Sedgwick 12 .400 6 .500
James 9 .300 7 .583
<<< HBAHBA::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]POOL_95.NOTE;1 >>>
-< POOL 95 >-
================================================================================
Note 7.41 Miscellaneous Comments 41 of 41
MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Some gave all" 10 lines 29-DEC-1995 10:49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Zogran 15 .500 6 .500
>Long 15 .500 6 .500
>The new standard: UMDanbillllline
It's always good to be remembered in some way.
billl
|
9.4044 | done pointed, too, yet, both | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Dec 29 1995 13:42 | 35 |
| and maybe:
Team Line Wins O/U by
-----------------------------------------------------
San Francisco 12.5 11 Under -2
Dallas 11.5 12 Over 0
Miami 10.5 9 Under -2
Pittsburgh 10.5 11 Over 0
New England 10.5 6 Under -5
Cleveland 9.5 5 Under -5
Oakland 9.5 8 Under -2
San Diego 9.5 9 Under -1
Denver 8.5 8 Under -1
Chicago 8.5 9 Over 0
Detroit 8.5 10 Over 1
Buffalo 8.5 10 Over 1
Minnesota 8.5 8 Under -1
Green Bay 8.5 11 Over 2
NY Giants 8.5 5 Under -4
Arizona 8.5 4 Under -5
Philadelphia 8.5 10 Over 1
Kansas City 7.5 13 Over 5
Indianapolis 7.5 9 Over 1
Seattle 7.5 8 Over 0
Atlanta 7.5 9 Over 1
NY Jets 7.5 3 Under -5
New Orleans 7.5 7 Under -1
Tampa Bay 6.5 7 Over 0
Washington 6.5 6 Under -1
Cincinnati 5.5 7 Over 1
St Louis 5.5 7 Over 1
Houston 5.5 7 Over 1
Carolina 2.5 7 Over 4
Jacksonville 2.5 4 Over 1
|
9.4045 | go figure | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Dec 29 1995 13:59 | 10 |
| Duh!
I was replying to 7.40. For some dopey reason I
never saw 7.39. I was wondering what 7.40 was from.
Boy do I feel like a dummy.
billl
|
9.4046 | diff'rent sprot | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Dec 29 1995 14:02 | 6 |
| Hey, not to worry.
In bridge, the dummy is at least one of the 4 smartest people at the
table.
TTom
|
9.4047 | .500 is better than the Mendoza Line | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Tue Jan 02 1996 09:25 | 8 |
| Hmmm. some way to ne meorialized <UMDanbillline>. The story of my
life, and I didn't even hit .500 in the weekly pool pickin' contest.
Glad I don't try to live off of my "entertainment" winnings.
Oh well, they just started a "Keno" type game here in GA. Can't do
much worse there!
UM(.500)Dan
|
9.4048 | | CAM::WAY | Ridi pagliacio | Tue Jan 02 1996 09:36 | 12 |
| Well, we recently got Powerball here in CT. I tried playing it. Didn't win
anything, but there are MORE ways to win than with the regular CT Lotto.
My luck on that stuff pretty much sucks, so I don't play often. It's like with
that scam, uh, er, deal that Bill Long ran with the "raffle".
You spend $10 on a ticket, with drawings every day of December for varying
amounts to win -- I think there were 250 tickets all told. I didn't win a damn
thing -- except the feeling that I had contributed to a good cause....
'Saw
|
9.4049 | Shula stepping down? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Thu Jan 04 1996 17:23 | 6 |
| Rumors flying out of Miami that Shula has stepped down. Spurrier has
been granted a one week "window" to talk with whatever pro teams are
interested, and JJ is tanned, rested and ready. Gonna be interesting times
for followers of the 'Fins.
UMDan
|
9.4050 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Fri Jan 05 1996 08:59 | 2 |
| It'd be great if Spurrier went to the Dolphins. Then they could *both*
fall flat on their faces...
|
9.4051 | waiting in the wings | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Jan 05 1996 10:35 | 9 |
| Ever one's reporting that ol' Don is hanging up the clibboard. He's
rumored to be going upstairs for the lasted year of his contract.
Candidates for this assumed opening range from Jimmy Johnson, who's
surprisingly silent and no likely to work for the Fish while Shula's
around, to Marty Schottenheimer if'n he wins it all thised year at KC,
to Steve Spurrier who looks like he needs a little coaching hisself, etc.
TTom
|
9.4052 | all JJ has to do is say Yes | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Fri Jan 05 1996 10:40 | 8 |
|
the real question you have to ask is since the Tampa bay job opened up
and is in FLA., where JJ says he wants to stay did Mr. Blockbuster ask
Don to step down for fear of loosing JJ to Tampa? It's my belief that
Wayne is just letting Don step down graciously without the pink slip
that Jerry layed on Landry........
mike
|
9.4053 | could be | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Jan 05 1996 10:55 | 13 |
| > the real question you have to ask is since the Tampa bay job opened up
> and is in FLA., where JJ says he wants to stay ...
Maybe ya oughta change that to "is currently in FLA." cause in all the
rumors they're the team most likely to relocate. Rumors are out where
they'll go to Cleveland and/or LA. I like the Cleveland one where the
Browns go to Baltimore, change their names to the Crabs or something in
that ilk and the Bucs move to Cleveland and become the Browns.
But the question about the timing of Shula's new assignment is something
that begs for a_answer.
TTom
|
9.4054 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | My python boot is to tight | Fri Jan 05 1996 11:07 | 6 |
|
Given that both the Florida teams need a coach, I would expect JJ to
take the Miami job if he's going to take one. Tampa has always sucked
and the owner won't put up the bucks to build a JJ type of team. Miami
has some talent, but needs someone to fire them up. Both would be a
challenge, but Miami would be the smart choice.
|
9.4055 | Why we hate the Cowboys part 934596798 | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Fri Jan 05 1996 11:10 | 9 |
|
Just so I can say I told ya, Philly will crush Dallas this weekend.
Ray Rhodes is a genuis. Philly's defense will eliminate Emitt early
after that it's game set match to the Eagles............
It'll be nice to see Troy boy eat some carpet this weekend and of
course most all Michael Irvin humilated and crying.......
mike
|
9.4056 | Don't count on it, Mikey | AKOCOA::BREEN | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust | Fri Jan 05 1996 11:20 | 5 |
| Mikey, just when I thought you had joined the sports cognoscenti with
your Camby statement you do this. I did take the 14 points but I fear
a massacre is in the making down in Dallas.
Wonder what the Sports Babe and her babies are saying about this one.
|
9.4057 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Fri Jan 05 1996 11:31 | 8 |
|
not to worry Bill repeat after me "Barry" "Barry" "Barry"!!!!
sure dallas has the athlete's but they don't have the heart or the
desire. They've proven time and time again this year by thinking
they can just show up and win. Ain't going to happen this sunday!
mike
|
9.4058 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | My python boot is to tight | Fri Jan 05 1996 11:39 | 7 |
|
MikeyC.
The Boy's will win despite BS's mistakes. The 20-17 loss in Philly had
no bearing on their future. They had lost HFA to the 9er's and had
already made the playoff's. The desire to show the league the can win
with BS will come through on Sunday.
|
9.4059 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Fri Jan 05 1996 11:58 | 6 |
|
The winners this weekend will be:
Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts.
- Sean
|
9.4060 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Fri Jan 05 1996 11:58 | 12 |
|
That loss is exactly why they'll loose again or do you forget the
Redskins' so soon? Barry will try to go macho macho after the loss
for revenge and get nailed. Philly has the cofidence, has the coach
and has a good core of experienced players who either been there
before or are dam hungry to get there.
Your attitude about the loss Cad is the same kind of flippant
attitude that I expect those arrognant sob cowpokes to have and
that my friend will be their downfall.......
mike
|
9.4061 | FWIW, IMO, BTW | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Jan 05 1996 12:02 | 17 |
| > The winners this weekend will be:
>
> Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts.
Exactly whatta ya mean by "winners"? Straight up? I think we got
ourselves a little teaser here ;=).
Straight up, I see ever one of these losing but the Packers winning
wouldn't surprise me. No way Dallas loses the game to da Iggles, Barry
Switzer notwithstanding.
KC will show their mainliness and whoops them Colts with their guy Zack,
who aint exactly shown that he can do it 2 games in a row.
Steelhaids win, pretty easy.
TTom
|
9.4062 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | My python boot is to tight | Fri Jan 05 1996 12:07 | 7 |
|
They have that attitude because they know they are better than the
Eagles. All that fire they had in Philly won't mean squat when they
show up in Texas Stadium.
Is there interest in a one week p-name bet on this Mikey?
|
9.4063 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Fri Jan 05 1996 12:38 | 2 |
|
maybe let me think about it....
|
9.4064 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Fri Jan 05 1996 12:47 | 13 |
|
> > The winners this weekend will be:
> >
> > Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts.
>
> Exactly whatta ya mean by "winners"? Straight up?
Yeah, no spread crap. The only one's I'm not highly confident
about are the Packers and to a lesser extent, the Bills. Indy/Philly
are locks, though.
- Sean
|
9.4065 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | My python boot is to tight | Fri Jan 05 1996 12:49 | 6 |
|
Mike,
If I do not respond later it's because I'm off this after noon. I'll
be outahere in 10 mins.
|
9.4066 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jan 05 1996 13:42 | 17 |
| > Given that both the Florida teams need a coach, I would expect JJ to
> take the Miami job if he's going to take one. Tampa has always sucked
> and the owner won't put up the bucks to build a JJ type of team. Miami
> has some talent, but needs someone to fire them up. Both would be a
> challenge, but Miami would be the smart choice.
Tampa's got a new owner, so we don't know if he's willing to spend
money. That's immaterial, 'cause Johnson has said many times that
if he comes back he WON'T buy free agents...he'll build through the
draft.
I read just this week that JJ has been looking at TB more closely and
likes their young talent (ie: they're already headed in the direction
he would want to go), although he don't like that wuss Dilfer. But,
I'm sure Ind will have to dump Erickson's salary now that Harbaugh
is the next Johnny U, so JJ can probably get Erickson back (and not
have to give the Colts their 1st-round pick back).
|
9.4067 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Jan 05 1996 13:53 | 6 |
| Yabbut, if'n the Bucs are rumored to be headed to
Cleveland "The Land of Burning Rivers", do you really
think JJ would be interested?
billl
|
9.4068 | | NQOS01::nqsrv406.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Fri Jan 05 1996 13:58 | 4 |
|
Hey Cad, can I make that pname bet wif ya?
brews
|
9.4069 | You've got to be kidding? | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Fri Jan 05 1996 23:28 | 15 |
| re. 4059
Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts as straight up winners?????!!!!
Even with the spread you would be lucky to win 2 out of 4. I do hope
you are right about the Eagles and Packers though. I would love to see
all of the prognasticators eat crow over the fact that the NFC
championship game includes neither Dallas nor San Francisco when
according to all of them it was a foregone conclusion that the NFC
championship game would be Dallas vs. San Francisco and the winner of
that game would beat anyone the AFC could send to the Super Bowl.
To honestly believe that is going to happen, however, would make me
a dreamer beyond reality.
D.J.
|
9.4070 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Sun Jan 07 1996 21:34 | 13 |
|
> Bills, Packers, Eagles, and Colts as straight up winners?????!!!!
>
> Even with the spread you would be lucky to win 2 out of 4.
Oh well, I only hit 2/4, but I still didn't need the spread. The
Bills were a disappointment, but I was worried about that pick. The
Eagles I just blew. Man, did they lay down and die - very sad.
Go Colts!
|
9.4071 | din't matter | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Mon Jan 08 1996 11:26 | 4 |
| In any case, the spread/line din't matter. 2 favorites covered and 2 dogs
won outright.
TTom
|
9.4072 | Can The Pack Do It??? | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 09 1996 11:39 | 6 |
| OK, so what do you guys think of the Packer/Cowboy matchup?
The Packer/49'er game was perhaps my most satisfying sports
watching moment in the last 26 years.
Tony
|
9.4073 | | NQOS01::16.65.128.163::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Tue Jan 09 1996 11:43 | 2 |
|
You've had a tough 26 years, Tony. 8^)
|
9.4074 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Tue Jan 09 1996 12:20 | 3 |
| Tony you have to get cable!
Jimbo
|
9.4075 | big | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 09 1996 12:34 | 7 |
| > OK, so what do you guys think of the Packer/Cowboy matchup?
Dallas, big.
FWIW, Pittsburgh, big, too, also, yet, again.
TTom
|
9.4076 | Yup | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 09 1996 13:23 | 5 |
| re: .4073
Its been UGLY!!! ;-)
Tony
|
9.4077 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Tue Jan 09 1996 16:09 | 9 |
|
I think if the Packers can keep it close they can win it in the 4th
quarter. I hope they blow doors off of dallas. I hope that the Packers
defense will attack Deon when he plays offense instead of standing
there in awe of him like Maluala did when he had him dead to right.
biggest obstacles I see are the homecooking, Aikman and Smith....
mike
|
9.4078 | I have my WIFE's method of picking teams ??? ARGH !!! | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Jan 10 1996 15:12 | 7 |
| INDY OVER KC.. WHAT HAPPEND ??? If Indy beats Pittsburg it could
be a very LONG day for the AFC in the BOWL (Why should this year
be any different). Worst thing is I have to listen to my wife, whe
once again has OUTDONE me in the PREDICTIONS.. Of course she has
Indy VS GB in the Superbowl I had KC vs Dallas in the Bowl...
MaB
|
9.4079 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jan 11 1996 10:11 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4078 by MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS >>>
> INDY OVER KC.. WHAT HAPPEND ???
The Indian war was a bloody dread
No one thought the Colts would even cover the spread
The Chiefs were to repeat Super Bowl III
but their season found it's end at 14 and 3.
Zack-ry, Zack-ry, Crocket
King of the NFL
George
|
9.4080 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Thu Jan 11 1996 12:14 | 7 |
| . The Indian war was a bloody dread
. No one thought the Colts would even cover the spread
. The Chiefs were to repeat Super Bowl III
. but their season found it's end at 14 and 3.
Except it was 13-4, George.
|
9.4081 | Poetic License | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jan 11 1996 12:20 | 3 |
| But III and 4 don't rhyme.
George
|
9.4082 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Thu Jan 11 1996 12:22 | 3 |
| No fooling.
(BTW, George, KC won SB IV, the Jets SB III. HTH.)
|
9.4083 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | My kingdom for K.Greene's locks | Thu Jan 11 1996 12:25 | 2 |
|
Your poetic license is hereby revoked.
|
9.4084 | GO PACK!! | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Thu Jan 11 1996 13:39 | 5 |
| re: .4078
I sure hope your wife is right!
Tony
|
9.4085 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Thu Jan 11 1996 14:13 | 3 |
|
Oh, don't worry. Garonteed GB/Indy Super Bowl.
|
9.4086 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Jan 11 1996 14:24 | 2 |
9.4087 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Jus scuttle buttin with StevieRay | Thu Jan 11 1996 14:26 | 4 |
|
Todays local rag indicated that Jimmy Johnson will be named the
Dolphins coach at a 2:00 edt press conference.
|
9.4088 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jan 11 1996 14:46 | 22 |
| This notes file is probably the only place where you can tell a joke and
someone complains that the punch line is technically incorrect. I can just
imagine what you guy were like watching Disney's Davy Crocket.
Born on a mountain top in Tennessee
Green-ist state in the land of the free
Raised in the woods sos he knew every tree
Killed him a b'ar, when he was only three
/nasal tone on
That's not right Tennessee is not as green as New York and there's no way a
three year old kid could kill a bear and besiiiiiiids you said it wrong you
said bar not bear ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha, you don't know what you are talking
about.
/nasal tone off
For you techno-wennie-nerds who need the joke explained, Superbowl III is
correct since a Chiefs win over the Cowboys or 49'ers in Superbowl XXX would
have been an upset like Joe Willie's upset over the Colts. The Chiefs win in
Superbowl IV was not as much of a surprise.
George
|
9.4089 | | CAM::WAY | Ridi pagliaccio | Thu Jan 11 1996 14:51 | 1 |
| No flies on you, George.
|
9.4090 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | My kingdom for K.Greene's locks | Thu Jan 11 1996 15:09 | 10 |
|
>> This notes file is probably the only place where you can tell
>> a joke and someone complains that the punch line is technically
>> incorrect.
How about if we just say that your poetry sucks. Really it does.
Completely. Never mind that's technically incorrect. It's also
arhythmic and puerile.
|
9.4091 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Thu Jan 11 1996 15:44 | 5 |
|
Hey! No fair writing replies that contain words I gotta
look up in the dictionary....
Claybone
|
9.4092 | Soooeee piiiggggg | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Jus scuttle buttin with StevieRay | Thu Jan 11 1996 15:50 | 1 |
|
|
9.4093 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jan 11 1996 15:59 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4090 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "My kingdom for K.Greene's locks" >>>
> How about if we just say that your poetry sucks. Really it does.
> Completely. Never mind that's technically incorrect. It's also
> arhythmic and puerile.
Woooo Tommy, deep. Not the dog pissing on a tree type note you usually write,
this is Mr. Peabody pissing on the Way Back machine.
George
|
9.4094 | Rules of doggerel?\ | AKOCOA::BREEN | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust | Thu Jan 11 1996 16:04 | 16 |
| I think poetic license allows one to be generally inaccurate but not
specifically inaccurate. George you made a specific statement as with
3 losses vs 4, sbIII vs sbIV. Contrast this to the poetic license of
55.175
The system hardly ever failed the pretty boys in blue.
Hell, hadn't Snuffy managed out of 30 tries to win a ring or two?
or
And lo the general stole the ball and when he layed it in
The Celts had slipped a point ahead, 40 seconds from the win.
Smith has not quite had 30 seasons not in McHale's last game was it
necessarily 40 seconds vs 45. However Snuffy was at the game and the
Celtics did have a 1 point lead under a minute to play.
|
9.4095 | You've got to be kidding??? | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Fri Jan 12 1996 06:06 | 8 |
| re .4085
I hope that when Pittsburgh and Dallas win this weekend, that you will
apologize to all the noters in this conference for that outrageous
"guarantee" that you so easily made. Especially to all Pittsburgh
fans since your picking an 11 pt. underdog, visiting, dome team.
D.J.
|
9.4096 | btw, spread has zero to do with who Vegas thinks is better | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Fri Jan 12 1996 08:19 | 11 |
|
You want me to "apologize" to Steeler fans for disagreeing with Las
Vegas?
Hmmmm... I'd say it's doubtful they'd apologize to me for being
right if'n the Steelers end up losing like I predicted.
Tell you what, though, if I'm wrong, I'll promise to eat lots of
crow, and post a hearty "Congrats" to all you Steeler fans.
- Sean
|
9.4097 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Fri Jan 12 1996 10:12 | 5 |
|
Well for those that might be in a cave somewhere, Jimmy Johnson has
signed on as the new Dolphins' coach. 2 million a year for 4 years.
mike
|
9.4098 | 4th down, O'Donnell throws, ball knocked down, Steelers lose !" | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jan 12 1996 10:58 | 12 |
| > Well for those that might be in a cave somewhere, Jimmy Johnson has
> signed on as the new Dolphins' coach. 2 million a year for 4 years.
Bill Parcells' job just got "|----------T H I S M U C H----------|"
tougher !
re: Pittsburgh fans
Is it me, or does anyone else think that Steelers fans are the most
SENSITIVE about anything even remotely negative about their team ???
|
9.4099 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Jan 12 1996 11:09 | 9 |
| >Is it me, or does anyone else think that Steelers fans are the most
>SENSITIVE about anything even remotely negative about their team ???
It's you.
billl
|
9.4100 | Why just four years? | MSBCS::BRYDIE | My kingdom for K.Greene's locks | Fri Jan 12 1996 11:11 | 11 |
9.4101 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jan 12 1996 11:15 | 7 |
| > KC notched 13 wins this year and all it got
> them was a shorter ride home after they got knocked out of the playoffs.
KC proved what I (and most) thought all year long --> they weren't as
good as their record. Too many "lucky", improbable wins.
The Shottenheimer Factor is another discussion.
|
9.4102 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Fri Jan 12 1996 11:22 | 2 |
| Kinda like the Browns proved they weren't as good as their
record last year might have suggested for this year.
|
9.4103 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Jan 12 1996 11:22 | 10 |
| I'm not convinved that "luck" and "ability to create
situations" in the NFL is mutually exclusive. By that
I mean that if team A plays agressive defense causing
team B to fumble/throw interceptions, I see that as
team B being "able to create situations". It would
appear that others in here would call team B "lucky".]
billl
|
9.4104 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 12 1996 11:25 | 29 |
|
> Pittsburg hasn't had the offense to be even an AFC champion and I ain't
> so sure they have it now regardless of some bogus stats.
So you like Indy to win outright? Make the prediction. Really, it
doesn't take _that_ much to be an "AFC Champion" anyway; I recognize
that. It's just Pittsburgh's turn, and one thing I do like is that
if it is their turn this season, it's a better year to have that
chance than when JJ was at the helm of the Cowboys, or when any
San Fran team has been in. Not a lot better but a little.
Honest question, Tommy: if the Steelers are in are you going to
convince yourself again that the AFC team has an honest chance and
take the points for the Nth straight year? My guess is no. But
I know that you even liked that joke of a Chargers team against
the 49ers last year. So when I look at your assessment of a team
like the Steelers which at the very least will show up with a solid
defense, against the backdrop of your recent faith in the AFC
champion, I just don't get it. No offense, but I just don't.
I'm not sensitive about the Steelers in general. I have flat-out
admitted that they have been Chokers with the capital C in recent
playoffs (I'm not blaming the refs and whining about bad luck; it's
been their own undoing). Others have argued that they're just not
that good. All are in full agreement that the final accomplishment
has not been enough; the "dispute" is over why.
glenn
|
9.4105 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jan 12 1996 11:44 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4104 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>
> So you like Indy to win outright? Make the prediction.
I'll take you up on that. I really like this Zack Crocket kid so I'm going
to jump on the Colts band wagon and predict the Colts as AFC Champs.
It will be fun and besides, if the Colts win then I can write more Davey
Crocket verses. It's destiny. Crocket, beating up Indians (Chiefs) thriving in
the East, and headed for his destiny with a team from Texas.
The Colts beat the Chiefs it was a major surprise
Arrow Head stadium has no more dry eyes
Now their off to Pittsburgh where the steal curtain lies
to play the black and gold for the AFC prize.
Zak-ry, Zak-ry Crocket
Runn'en on borrowed time.
George
|
9.4106 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon | Fri Jan 12 1996 12:03 | 5 |
| George, Crockett had one good game against San Diego. He didn't
have a good game against KC, and won't against Pittsburgh.
Harbaugh might, however. I think Indy will lose outright, but will
cover the spread. Same for GB, cover but lose.
|
9.4107 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | My kingdom for K.Greene's locks | Fri Jan 12 1996 12:11 | 29 |
9.4108 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jan 12 1996 12:48 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4106 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R "NW Wildcats Rose Bowl Bandwagon" >>>
> George, Crockett had one good game against San Diego. He didn't
> have a good game against KC, and won't against Pittsburgh.
Well Davey Crockett didn't have that great a career either. He fought part
of a war against the Creek Indians, served a term as a back bencher in
Congress then showed up at the Alamo in time to get himself killed. But
reality is not what's important here. It's the legend which grows from the
songs that are written. By the time I'm finished, he'll be the NFL's MVP.
George
|
9.4109 | Even Crockett, Davy, had to occasionally shoot a moving target | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 12 1996 13:00 | 14 |
|
Notably unmentioned throughout the spread of this "Legend of Zack'ry
Crockett" the week after his big game against the Chargers was the
fact that on those TD runs he was just pretty much motoring straight
ahead, maybe breaking one tackle at the line of scrimmage but
otherwise totally unimpeded by any opposition other than his own
fear of the goalline. Now granted, that says something about the
Colts' O-line, and yes, Crockett deserves some credit for his speed
for a well-built back, but the conclusion here is not to expect it to
happen again. As in ever, not just against the Steelers. I think
we're talking Timmy Smith, 'cept Crockett has a better name.
glenn
|
9.4110 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Fri Jan 12 1996 13:06 | 4 |
| I wonder if he'll put a tail on his helmet and start calling the football
Ol' Betsy.
George
|
9.4111 | There's fluke, and then there's fluke... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 12 1996 13:09 | 20 |
|
> That joke of a team went into Three Rivers last year and won the AFC
> title game against the team that has "the most wins in the AFC in the
> last four years" trophy.
So what. The breakdowns Pittsburgh suffered are well-documented
(from this past Monday's USA Today: "In the AFC title match, the
Steelers outplayed and dominated the Chargers but lost 17-13 when
they failed to come up with the knockout punch and allowed
backbreaking plays"). It's not a strong enough argument against
the Steelers, for the Chargers. What you've said is that last
year the Chargers were legit because they did in fact win the AFC.
Therefore, if the Steelers do so this year they should be regarded
in at least the same esteem (imo much more so though), but instead
you consider them to be a fraud.
Ah, what the hell, let the games be played...
glenn
|
9.4112 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | My kingdom for K.Greene's locks | Fri Jan 12 1996 15:53 | 20 |
|
>> So what. The breakdowns Pittsburgh suffered are well-documented
The Patsies suffered some of the same sort of breakdowns when they
played the Steelers this year in a game that we had many an opport-
unity to win and really should have. We didn't win and it wasn't
because Pittsburgh got lucky. It's as simple as talented well-coached
teams don't make the kind of errors that we did against Pittsburgh or
that Pittsburgh did against SD. If you were good enough to win you
would have. You didn't. Pittsburgh has been lucky this year in that
they faced Buffalo when Buffalo didn't have their best player and now
they face Indy when they don't have Faulk who is arguably their best
player. No matter. Pittsburgh's overrated defense if vulnerable right
up the gut and Marchibroda knows it. The Colts defense led by big
Tony Siragusa isn't going to be pushed around like Buffalo was.
The comparison between the Bucs and the Steelers not getting to the
championship is a valid one. In each case there's been a better
team in front of you. This time for the Steelers it's Indy. Indy
wins a grinding game 14-10.
|
9.4113 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Jan 12 1996 16:17 | 7 |
| > Indy wins a grinding game 14-10.
I suspect you'll be dining on some over-cooked, garbage-
eatin' crow come Monday, Tommy.
billl
|
9.4114 | | CHEFS::7A1_GRN | Keep the blue flag flying | Mon Jan 15 1996 04:21 | 6 |
| 20-16
Any orders for humble pie lads?
CHARLEY
|
9.4115 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jan 15 1996 08:21 | 10 |
| Wow, what a finish. A Colt receiver had the winning hail Mary pass in his lap
and his hands almost on it but seemed to throw his hands away from the ball and
let it hit the ground before grabbing it. It was that close, one contracted arm
muscle and the Colts would be going to the superbowl.
What a game!
No more Davy Crockett songs, Zack's demise had nothing to do with Texas.
George
|
9.4116 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Mon Jan 15 1996 08:27 | 5 |
|
I don't think the missed Hail Mary was the end of the game. Coryatt's
dropped interception sealed this one. He keeps that in his hands, and
the Colts are going to Tempe.
|
9.4117 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jan 15 1996 08:41 | 15 |
| Actually I saw three potential game ending catches dropped. The Colts missed
an interception that could have ended it, then a few minutes later after
scoring the Steelers missed an interception that could have ended it, then the
dropped Hail Mary pass.
In a way it was like that Miami/K.C. Christmas game back in the early 70's
when Steneru for K.C. missed two chances to kick a game winning sudden death
field goal before Yapremmian finally made the kick.
Great finish. Now if only they could figure out how to have Superbowls like
that. Maybe they do need to seed the Superbowl tourney without regard to
Conferences. There would still be the occasional blow out but it would probably
mean more close Superbowls.
George
|
9.4118 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Jan 15 1996 08:46 | 9 |
|
for starters they could start by not worrying about almighty
merchandising buck and call a Dallas game fair and square. I
was absolutely disgusted with the crap they let Dallas get away
with yesterday. I watch golf instead because the outcome was
inevivatable. Dallas fans remind of UConn fans, they get 75% of
all the calls and still whine about the other 25%....
mike
|
9.4119 | | CAM::WAY | A fig-bar of my imagination | Mon Jan 15 1996 09:03 | 4 |
| > inevivatable. Dallas fans remind of UConn fans, they get 75% of
> all the calls and still whine about the other 25%....
That's funny. Dallas fans remind ME of GEORGETOWN fans.....8^)
|
9.4120 | HOW BOUT THEM COWBOYS | STRATA::GARRY | | Mon Jan 15 1996 09:06 | 12 |
| Mike I take it your grapes are tasting awful SOUR this morning. hahaha
You need to take your ANTI Dallas glasses off....both teams were
getting away with murder.
And another thing..stop acting like Magoo and give Barry Switzer his
due...he proved to the whole world he knows his football...the guy
is a genius..since he outcoached in your mind 2 genius's Rhodes and
Holmgren
Tom
|
9.4121 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NCAA Baseball in less 2 weeks | Mon Jan 15 1996 10:32 | 18 |
| > And another thing..stop acting like Magoo and give Barry Switzer his
> due...he proved to the whole world he knows his football...the guy
> is a genius..since he outcoached in your mind 2 genius's Rhodes and
> Holmgren
Dallas has a great collection of players, both on the line and at the
skill positions. They have much more talent than anyone in football.
Interestingly enough, when the NFL listed how much each team spent on
salaries and bonuses this past year, Dallas spent over $60 million,
while the second place team spent $43 million. (Remember, salary cap was
$38 million this year.)
Barry Switzer is not a football genius. Geez, I am smart enough to
tell the Cowboys to run Emmitt Smith behind that huge line. The wonder
is that Dallas can't beat San Fransisco, not that they always beat
everyone else.
|
9.4122 | Switzer > Johnson | LUDWIG::GARRY | | Mon Jan 15 1996 10:55 | 12 |
|
The point I am trying to make to Mike is...when Dallas loses its
Switzers fault,when Dallas wins he has nothing to do with it,what
gives,when they lose why blame the coach ????? They won and beat
supposed superior head coaches....give Barry credit.
Philly and GB have loads of talent too.......hell GB had the MVP
but Barry is gonna get his players another SB ring...give the guy
some credit.
Tom
|
9.4123 | | CAM::WAY | A fig-bar of my imagination | Mon Jan 15 1996 11:14 | 20 |
| > -< Switzer > Johnson >-
I'm no Cowboys fan but I'll tell you right now, this is baloney.
Dallas wins in spite of Switzer, mainly because of the talent that
Jimmy Johnson packed the team with.
Switzer walked into a dream -- a proven, talent-laden team, that knows
how to win. The first year there, he couldn't get them to the Super Bowl.
This year they're going in spite of Switzer.
JMHO, but don't expect us to believe Switzer is better than Johnson.
Not by a long shot.
|
9.4124 | | LUDWIG::GARRY | | Mon Jan 15 1996 11:27 | 7 |
|
Lets not forget last year Dallas was beat up real bad...Emmitt was
30 % and Williams was out with the car accident..yet Switzer still
took Dallas to the NFC championship game last year and almost won,
the guy knows the game of football.
Tom
|
9.4125 | Switzer did it, Seiffort didn't | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Jan 15 1996 11:36 | 12 |
| Switzer seems to make up in motivational technique what he may lack in
terms of Jimmy Johnson efficiency. Keeping that collection of high
priced talent motivated and focused is not easy and you could see
yesterday the Cowboys had a big letdown from the Philly win.
Dallas may have a big overconfidence problem with Pitt and the 17
points (my guess) spread won't make it any easier. Deion and his
antics and the beating his internal people took the last two weeks add
to his problems.
And of course simply winning won't be enough, he has to win big to
satisfy his critics.
|
9.4126 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Mon Jan 15 1996 12:27 | 14 |
| Dallas once again got the advantage of every close call, and some that
weren't very close. The crackback by Williams was a dirty play, even if
it was legal (which is debatable). There were several pass interferance
calls that were bogus. Williams and Newton were constantly (like almost
every play) going to the facemask to keep out the Packers DL. All I can
assume is that there are totally incompetent officials who cannot see a
freaking thing on the interior line play. I'm not sure that the Packers
would have won with a straight up game, but it would have been a hell
of a lot closer.
I really like the fact that after the game, Reggie White said what
needed to be said and blasted the refs big time. The Philadelphia Daily
News has a piece today on his comments, basically saying that there is
a pattern of illegal tactics by the Cowbou OL.
|
9.4127 | GIVE THE MAN HIS DUE | LUDWIG::GARRY | | Mon Jan 15 1996 12:58 | 13 |
|
Lets face it,All ref suc* in all sports....Lets stop crying and
admit the best team in football WON again like they will in 2 weeks.
I believe Michael IRVIN said it best"WE ARE GOING HOME GIVE THE MAN HIS DUE"
He has taken enough Shi* from you guys(The Media).
How about them COWBOY'S
Tom
P.S. How many years to the NFC championship game????
How maNy times in the last 4 years to the BIG SHOW???
|
9.4128 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Mon Jan 15 1996 13:17 | 9 |
| Tom, you sound just like an old Soviet propaganda machine.
No one is denying that the Cowboys have talent. Game 1 against my Giants
proved that, no sweat.
But the Cowboys have gotten just as much home cookin' from the refs this
season as the Bulls do.
|
9.4129 | Would you like some cheese with that whine? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Mon Jan 15 1996 13:28 | 17 |
| >> <<< Note 9.4126 by GRANPA::DFAUST "Bad Things, man..." >>>
>>
>> Dallas once again got the advantage of every close call, and some that
Quit whining. I saw plays in which the Packer's O-line were going to
the face, too, and they didn't get called. The refs were letting 'em
play, and the Cowboys just played better than the Packers.
As for pass interference calls, I only remember 2, and they both looked
legit to me. Hell, one of them was more of a mugging than interference,
and it was declined because Irvin made a great catch.
According to Tom Jackson on ESPN, the hit that took Jurkovic out was
legal. His words, not mine. But I don't suppose that means anything
here.
Jerry
|
9.4130 | It's that time of year: sickened by winner's antics | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl! | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:01 | 10 |
|
Michael Irvin may be the biggest punk in football. He's far more
detestable than Deion. Deion, I can actually get a chuckle from
him. Irvin's gone back to dancing fantastic after the successful
6-yard square-out. Here's hoping that it was something in the
water in Arizona and that the Steeler DBs can do unto Irvin as was
done unto Irvin by Penn State in the 1987 Fiesta Bowl.
glenn
|
9.4131 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:06 | 7 |
| Weird thing about Dieon is that one time during the game he started doing his
dance while he still had a defender between him and the goal. Now that's
confidence. Can't say I've ever seen that one before.
Maybe he was trying to fake the guy out but the defender didn't go for it.
George
|
9.4132 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:32 | 9 |
| >As for pass interference calls, I only remember 2, and they both looked
>legit to me. Hell, one of them was more of a mugging than interference,
>and it was declined because Irvin made a great catch.
Jerry, I hope you're not talking about the call on that last Dallas TD drive
after Favre threw the INT. There's no way Teague interfered with Irvin.
The way I saw it Irvin had his arms around Teague's head (Teague didn't
know where the ball was) as he caught the ball. No way that's defensive
interference.
|
9.4133 | That's the one | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:42 | 22 |
| >>Jerry, I hope you're not talking about the call on that last Dallas TD drive
>>after Favre threw the INT. There's no way Teague interfered with Irvin.
>>The way I saw it Irvin had his arms around Teague's head (Teague didn't
>>know where the ball was) as he caught the ball. No way that's defensive
>>interference.
Yeah, Garb, that's one of them. The way I saw it, Irvin was trying to
catch the ball, and Teague was interfering. By your own admission,
Teague didn't know where the ball was, and he definitely had his
back to the ball. And it sure looked like he was making contact.
No way that's NOT defensive interference.
I'll admit that Irvin has benefitted on some questionable inteference
calls, but that wasn't one of them. If Teague had been turned around
and at least given the impression of going for the ball, I might agree
with you.
Do you consider it incidental contact and a non-foul, or offensive interference?
Just curious.
Jerry
|
9.4134 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:51 | 12 |
| I didn't see the play in question.
Now, with that out of the way, even if it was defensive interference, the
non-call was owed to Teague. Watch Irvin and 90 percent of the time he
pushes off.
Mr "Gotta Dance" pushes off more than any other WR in the league. I've
heard Madden and other CCs comment on it quite often.
Just a_observation,
'Saw
|
9.4135 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NCAA Baseball in less 2 weeks | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:51 | 7 |
| > Yeah, Garb, that's one of them. The way I saw it, Irvin was trying to
> catch the ball, and Teague was interfering. By your own admission,
> Teague didn't know where the ball was, and he definitely had his
> back to the ball. And it sure looked like he was making contact.
Teague was looking right at the ball, as Irvin had his arms wrapped around
his head.
|
9.4136 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:52 | 6 |
| > Teague was looking right at the ball, as Irvin had his arms wrapped around
> his head.
Maybe Irvin wanted to smooch him 8^)
|
9.4137 | right now I'd rather talk about flowers | CNTROL::CHILDS | Washing Machine | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:54 | 9 |
|
change the subject. The Cowboys won. THe Cowboys suck! They ruined
yesterday for me, please stop them from ruining today for me.....
thank you very little
mike
;^)
|
9.4138 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NCAA Baseball in less 2 weeks | Mon Jan 15 1996 14:58 | 12 |
| > <<< Note 9.4137 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Washing Machine" >>>
> -< right now I'd rather talk about flowers >-
>
>
> change the subject. The Cowboys won. THe Cowboys suck! They ruined
> yesterday for me, please stop them from ruining today for me.....
Wasn't there a guy named Richmond Flowers you used to play for the
Cowboys ? Or am I thinking of someone else ?
HTH :^)
|
9.4139 | yes he played for them in early 70's | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Field Service Tool Pusher | Mon Jan 15 1996 15:01 | 2 |
|
|
9.4140 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Mon Jan 15 1996 15:02 | 9 |
| What the heck is the matter with Fox. I watched the entire game and only saw
1/2 of 1 Dallas Cowboy's Cheerleader.
I've got to say I'm really disappointed. When I heard Fox was going to take
over football I thought they'd lift the band but I guess it's not going to
happen. Maybe it's something to do with most of the crew coming over from CBS
and old habits dieing hard.
George
|
9.4141 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Jan 15 1996 15:20 | 3 |
| Flowers was the subject of a tv hbo style docu-drama. His father was a
Tennessee DA during the integration crises and Flowers was a star in
high school not only in football but was a world class hurdler.
|
9.4142 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jan 15 1996 15:53 | 4 |
| >Do you consider it incidental contact and a non-foul, or offensive interference?
>Just curious.
Jerry, given the situation, I expect a non-call at the very least.
|
9.4143 | | CSLALL::BRULE | country in need of a leader | Mon Jan 15 1996 15:57 | 5 |
| Not to mention the non pick call when Novacek blocked the CB on the 3rd
and 9 play and Sanders picked up the first down on Dallas' first TD
drive.
Mike
|
9.4144 | Did someone ask? ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl! | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:02 | 17 |
|
> Flowers was the subject of a tv hbo style docu-drama. His father was a
> Tennessee DA during the integration crises and Flowers was a star in
> high school not only in football but was a world class hurdler.
Pretty good movie, I thought. All true too. Flowers' father was
actually the Alabama DA (wanna bet?) who tried a couple very hot
civil rights movement murder cases, and became a hated man. So
Richmond Jr. basically said, bleep you, 'bama, I'm going to go play
my football for Tennessee and come back to beat you. They did once,
too, in a big upset. Flowers also overcame some kind of crippling
childhood disability that left him unable to walk on his own,
until after rehab (a la Gump, Glenn Cunningham, some others too
I suppose).
glenn
|
9.4145 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:04 | 35 |
| I didn't see where anybody said the Cowboys weren't the better team
yesterday. I have seen all of the Cowboy apologists say that the team
from Dallas doesn't cheat, which is incorrect.
OOn the drive that set up the first TD, an illegal pick was the big
play on the scoring drive. This was (an is) cheating.
All day, on virtually every play, Williams was going to the face of
Reggie White. It was pointed out to the official responsible for making
that call in the first quarter, who still did not call it, even though
it was plainly visible the entire game. That official is either
incompetent or corrupt, and I can't tell which is the case.
I did not say that the crackback block was an illegal play, I said it
was a dirty play. Anyone who has ever played on the OL will tell you
that pplays like that have no place in football. It was the action of a
dirty lowdown punk who shouldn't be playing, if those are the types of
tactics he uses. Williams has, for the last two weeks, been using shots
to the head and facemask as part of his normal blocking schemes. A
fitting punishment might be for Mr. Lloyd and Mr. Greene from
Pittsburgh to stand him up while another steeler comes in from the side
and blow out his knee. From my understanding that would be perfectly
within the rules, as well.
The first pass interference call was bogus, as the Cowboy ran into the
Packer defender who was standing on the field waiting for the receiver
to cut. That also set up a TD, as I recall.
The officiating gave Dallas a huge advantage in momentum and had a
great deal to do with the way Dallas ran the ball, considering the
illegal tactics that Williams and Newton employ. I still think that
Dallas would have won, but it would be nice if they had to play ny NFL
rules, not WWF rules as they used yesterday.
|
9.4146 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:05 | 6 |
| Hey, the established team gets the calls. There's nothing new about that.
Green Bay needs a speedster out of the backfield to give defenses something
to watch for. It's the only glaring weakness I see. Next year they have
to care games they should win (St. Louis, Tampa Bay) and maybe they can
get Dallas up in GB in the playoffs.
|
9.4147 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Field Service Tool Pusher | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:07 | 5 |
|
That Pick bs is a joke. The guy defending Novacheck ran him into the
other guy. The did the same against the 9er's last week. I would guess
the Cowboys saw that and made up a play to defeat the defensive ploy.
|
9.4148 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:09 | 4 |
| How's that go? The defender sets the pattern? I don't think so. Try a
different lie to cover up the cheating of the Dallas Cowboys.
|
9.4149 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Field Service Tool Pusher | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:12 | 3 |
|
Take that lying shit and stuff it.
|
9.4150 | Don't complain about morals in a morality play... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl! | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:13 | 10 |
|
Dallas has always cheated and, quite likely, always will. The
minute things got a bit clean, who enters the scene but Whitewater
Jerry Jones. I thought everyone knew that and that it was just an
accepted part of the game that just must be overcome. Stop whining,
Packers fans. Like it oughta be, it's Steelers-Cowboys III in Super
Bowl XXX, Good versus Evil, with Good wearing black...
glenn
|
9.4151 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:16 | 6 |
| re: .9149
I would if you Cowboy fans would come out of denial about the cheating
Cowboys.... The entire country saw it pointed out to them consistantly
yesterday and you folks cannot take the heat. Tough toenails!
|
9.4152 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NCAA Baseball in less 2 weeks | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:22 | 6 |
| Well, I think the Cowboys won the way NFL games are always
played.
Having said so, that pick was so obviously illegal and deliberately
done by Novocek, only a Cowboy fan could think it was a designed
play by Green Bay. What a ridiculous idea !
|
9.4153 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Field Service Tool Pusher | Mon Jan 15 1996 16:31 | 20 |
|
Heat has nothing to do with being called a liar. You ask any of these
noters if I come across with the type of BS.
Everything you've been whinning about is practiced by every team in the
league.
Having played Tight end I know damn well if a lb gets his hands on you
he can move most any place he wants. The Packers had moved Brent Jones
all over the field or knocked him on his can most every time he came
through their territory. Teams see that type of play and come up with
a method of defeating that method of play.
If you can't come with any better excuse for the Pack not winning than
this kind of nonsense you need some help. The Packer have lost six
straight to the Cowboys. I suppose you'll tell they cheated to win
everyone.
A team with talent and desire will not lose if they make fewer
mistakes than the challenger.
|
9.4154 | Officiating Looked Biased, But Other Factors Bigger | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 15 1996 17:06 | 33 |
| With as rough and physical as the game was, it was kind of odd
that after about half of the game called, the Cowboys had one
penalty for 15 yards.
It might be hard to figure the Cowboys could actually amass a
penalty, but when the punter grabs the returner by the helmet
and thats how he brings him down, I guess you just have to call
it, albeit begrudgingly.
My main complaint is the block on Jurkovic and the pick by
Novacek. The Pack did do a similar pick (location-wise) in SF,
but it was MUCH more subtle. Brooks barely made contact with
the defender. This 'pick' looked like an open field block about
15 yards downfield! It was blatant.
I don't comprehend how an official can miss that unless he decides
to.
Losing Jurkovic played right into the Packers unfortunate abysmal
time of possession problem and (of course) denied them a starting nose
tackle to rotate with other DL's. It was a huge loss as the line
was obviously exhausted. It seemed as though much of Emmit's
success was right around that spot Jurkovic could have helped with
(the interior of the line).
Still, the Packer's mainly lost because they needed an MVP per-
formance from Favre and they got something less than that. His
shaky start destroyed the all-important time of possession stat and
his second INT was just a bonehead decision.
The Cowboys had nothing to do with either of those.
Tony
|
9.4155 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Mon Jan 15 1996 17:27 | 20 |
| re: 4153
No one has said that the officials cost the Packers the game, but you
continue to deny something that was never accused.
The claim that the defender pushed Novace, creating the pick, is
laughable, asinine and false. If that isn't a lie, you are extremely
ignorant of what can happen in that situation.
The fact is that the Cowboys cheated during the game and got caught. I
havnt't seen you admit that the Cowboys cheated, but I have seen
everyone else say that the Cowboys would have won anyway. A little
truth from you would go a long way.
Nobody is whining, they are mearly pointing out facts. You defend your
Cowboys, after they were caught redhanded by Fox's replay cameras, by
saying "everybody does it". Pretty weak..... Overall, a pretty shabby
way to win an NFC championship. Looked a little like a WWF
championship.
|
9.4156 | Dirty rotten cheating sponsored by NFL under The White Hat | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl! | Mon Jan 15 1996 17:36 | 15 |
|
> It might be hard to figure the Cowboys could actually amass a
> penalty, but when the punter grabs the returner by the helmet
> and thats how he brings him down, I guess you just have to call
> it, albeit begrudgingly.
You have to throw it, but it was such a blatant personal foul that
they could have tossed the punter out of the game for it. The
intentional facemask rule is not in the books to an allow an even
trade of 15-yards for the right to break someone's neck. In this
case the cheating wasn't "planned" but was typical of Cowboy
football nonetheless.
glenn
|
9.4157 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Field Service Tool Pusher | Mon Jan 15 1996 17:47 | 17 |
|
Was a defender standing next to Novacek when he ran into the man
coming across the middle with Sanders. So Novachek is suppose to have
run over in front of one man and wait to pick off the other when he
came by. Now that takes some doing. All that was shown is Novachek
running into the defender. It did not show how it got put into that
position.
Like I said I played that position, a pass catching tight
end is much smaller than an inside Lb and can therefore be put into
most any position the lb wants when within the five yard zone. In a
passing situation the tight end is one of the lb's responsibiliy.
>Forget it I'm lying and the Cowboys are the biggest and best cheaters
in the league.
|
9.4158 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Tue Jan 16 1996 08:06 | 9 |
| Just a MINOR nit from your Moderator folks.
Debate all you want, I've got no problem with that, but please, let's try
to keep our tempers, and maintain SOME level of decorum.
Okay?
Thank you,
'Saw
|
9.4159 | Why Can't I Get In American_Football? HELP! | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 16 1996 08:19 | 5 |
| I can't seem to get in the American_Football conference. Wrong
device or something like that. Does anyone know why I can't get
in? What a time to not be able to get in!!
Tony
|
9.4160 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Tue Jan 16 1996 08:42 | 14 |
| re: .4157
At least the last lines of your reply were truthful!! ;*)
Switzer has brought the same outlaw outlook to the Dirty Dallaas
Cowboys that he used during the bad old days at Oklahoma.
I heard some halfwit on the radio yesterday spouting off about how you
didn't have to like Dallas but you had to respect them. I think this is
laughable. I respect programs that get it done the correct way, within
the rules and no dirty play. I don't respect the win at any cost type
of play that Dallas exhibits. The thing that galls the Cowboy fans is
the focus their dirty and illegal plays has gotten. It was exposed for
the entire country to see last Sunday.
|
9.4161 | undaunted | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 08:53 | 22 |
| Chiming in, a little late, but what the hey...
Earlier I predicted a couple of blowouts. Wail, not only was the
Indy-Pittsburgh game not a blowout but it was one of the better games
I've seen lately in terms of having the contest being contested up to the
end.
There were a couple of bad calls at or near the end zone but they sorta
neutralized each other. I guess you could say that the refs let 'em play.
The Green Bay-Dallas game weren't really a blowout, neither, too. The
Pack were in it up until the lasted quarter when it looked like they ran
outta gas. Too bad there were a couple of cheap shots by the Boys cause
they din't need it.
So, without further ado, I declare, by no authority vested in me, that
we're gonna get another one of them yawners. I'm looking for about 40-14
where Pittsburgh scores early and late and it's all the Boys in between.
Of course, I could be totally wrong, ....
TTom
|
9.4162 | Roland was that Dallas game a conspiracy | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 16 1996 09:07 | 3 |
| I was just wondering if there was a conspiracy among nfl officials to
give the nfc title to Dallas. I leave it to our noted expert on
conspiracies, TEFKAR.
|
9.4163 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jan 16 1996 09:14 | 14 |
| I don't think NFL officials are talented enough to give a game to a team.
This is nothing new, remember the AFC Championship game last year where the
final score had little if anything to do with what happened on the field?
Unlike baseball where the instant replay has shown how good officials can be
in football it shows how bad they can be. That's why during the sensible period
they actually used the replay to reverse the most horrendous calls.
Too bad they don't use that system now so the players can determine the
outcome of a game through what they do rather than what the officials think
they did.
George
|
9.4164 | TV likes it | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 09:22 | 12 |
| Certainly, you caint just stop at the NFL.
I don't know who's carrying the supposedly Super Bowl but ya gotta
believe that of the choices they had, it'd be hard to beat Dallas and
Pittsburgh.
Sometime during the Indy game, I can see some deep dark secret in action
central making the call to be sure the Steelers won.
However, it din't look like the Cowboys needed no steenkin fix.
TTom
|
9.4165 | Lamenting The Cowboy Blues | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 16 1996 09:23 | 41 |
| From my perspective, the Cowboys are such an easy team to
dislike. Michael Irvin is positively nauseas. His prancing
is the essence of self-exaltation/love/worship whatever. It
is so pathetic that Sanders is lily white in comparison. (As
an aside, while Brooke's dance wasn't nearly as grotesque, I
would that he dispensed with it altogether.)
The owner wants his face on the screen every moment. The team's
'cap' seems to be several million dollars above the 2nd highest
team (and by the way...here I fault the 49'ers as well), they give
a guy a 35 mil dollar contract. I have my own opinions on the
style of play of the o-line. Switzer has the class of - oh I
don't know. Here's the guy who said, after whipping UCLA one year,
and commenting on how much less bulky the Bruin players were, "I
guess they never heard of steroids over there." After beating the
Eagles, he said, "We kicked their ass." Sure, people might say such
things behind closed doors, but at least not in public! You would
NEVER hear Landry say such a thing.
They are the most talented team in the NFL, but a lot of people
instinctively have a sort of 'ethical' perception.
The ethical quotient of the Cowboys from the top down appears to
be depressingly low. This is honestly why I think people tend
not to like them. They project a morality that is baser than
most other teams and people sense this.
So Cowboy fans say, in effect, "Too bad." Well, yes it is too
bad. I'd rather lose than pay a guy 35 mil. I don't believe
in win at all costs and if the game evolves to the point where
if you play, thats what you gotta do...well, then if I was an
owner, I'd choose not to play the game. I'd sell the team. I'd
walk away from the sport - gladly.
This has me feeling for the better guys. Guys like Aikmen, Smith
(although he can seem a little arrogant too), and others.
They really are your figurative "guys with the black hats."
Tony
|
9.4166 | Replay - Good Riddance, don't want to see it again | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 16 1996 09:24 | 16 |
| The use of replay simply didn't work. It delayed games, was used
virtually all the time instead of just crucial plays and then some
crucial plays which should have been reversed were never reviewed.
Then when reviews were done they still couldn't make decisions about
reversing calls or not saying they needed to be sure before reversing
and then reversing calls which were right in the first place.
Finally the one that did it was the Bills - Giants Superbowl when the
Bills were scrambling against the clock, one or no timeouts left and lo
and behold here comes instant replay and a three minute timeout for the
Bills to plot there next 5 plays. If Norwood makes the kick then it
wasn't the officials nor the players but instant replay which decided
the game.
Hockey has it right but they never figured out how to do it in the NFl
to satisfy real fans.
|
9.4167 | No, it was not. | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Jan 16 1996 09:26 | 21 |
|
Why?
1) From the portion of the game that I saw, Dallas would have won the game
without any zebra help.
2) Many people feel the Cowboys have been getting the calls for years (for as
long as I can remember watching football, which is since about 1970).
Conspiracies typically can't hold together that long without unraveling -
people typically open their mouths, get bribed to talk, or commit sloppy
mistakes. 26 years is a long, long time.
I think I'm a quite believable source for this, given how much I hate them.
I don't think the Cowboys are wearing stars - I think they're pentagrams
covered with paint...
On a semi-unrelated point - someone was complaining about Jett's tackle on
the long Packer punt return. Give it up. The guy was trying to prevent a
touchdown - I'm sure tackling isn't high on the list of things he works on
at practice. I'd feel a little differently about it if it was done by someone
more experienced in such matters.
|
9.4168 | bestest, period | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 09:44 | 14 |
| Back when the Steelers were beating the Cowboys - 70s - Dallas had every
right in the book to complain about the officiating. They had plays to
complain about in about ever game including a couple of questionable
calls deep in the secondary, all of which seemed to go the Burghers way.
Right now, Dallas is the bestest team, period. Shore there a bunch of
arrogant bung holes but man for man they out talent any team out there,
including the Niners. Certainly, no one else has all the offensive
talent, not even close.
Now, where it gets pitiful is to compare the skill positions of the
Steelers to the Cowboys. No wonder we already got a double digit line.
TTom
|
9.4169 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Jan 16 1996 10:03 | 11 |
|
You Steelers fans can pull the horseshoes out of your butts now.
They worked because you were lucky to win that game. Lucky that
Kordell Stewart's bogus td wasn't called back like it should
have been. Lucky that that Pittsburg db blew the play and was
in the wrong place at the right time to make a critical 3rd down
stoppage. Lucky that the Colts went brain dead on that 39 yard
pass play to set up the game winning td. After of the whining about
the tough luck you've had the last few years you made up for it
all in one game. You were lucky.
|
9.4170 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Jan 16 1996 10:06 | 1 |
| Tommy, what are you trying to say?
|
9.4171 | and more | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 10:13 | 16 |
| Wail, Tommy this aint all that good a_example.
> Kordell Stewart's bogus td wasn't called back like it should
Ol' Kordell got major league jobbed when the Colt DB crushed him afore
the ball got to him on the goal line. Not only was the DB early but he
was making no attempt at the ball but was clearly merely trying to unload
on Slash.
As for luck, you left out a minor piece of the puzzle: they was lucky to
play the Colts at the Burgh and not the Chiefs at Arrowhaid.
Nexted time, please try to be a little more thorough when bad mouthing a
team, please?
TTom
|
9.4172 | paranoid ramblings | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Jan 16 1996 10:51 | 18 |
|
Sometimes I think... "There's so much money at stake, there has
to be a subtle conspiracy to sway major games."
That may be too harsh, since I don't think that there is an
an "explicit" plan. There's no person or persons at the bottom
of it all, and no way to prove much of anything specific.
But the way we expect calls to go the "media darlings" or the hometown
team is all part of it. I just can't believe that it is a mere coincidence
that the Steelers and the Cowboys are in the Super Bowl. It's what NBC
and half the country wanted.
I honestly feel like the NFL has become entertainment more than sports.
I half expect my Super Bowl telecast to suddenlt glitch out as
the "Capricorn One"-like movie sattelite hits a snag.
- Sean
|
9.4173 | seen it | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 11:12 | 11 |
| > I honestly feel like the NFL has become entertainment more than sports.
You mean like NBA?
I think this is the natural progression of letting the networks, shoe
companies, etc., run the business side of things. It's about ruined
basketball and football seems to be nexted.
Who cares what happens to baseball...
TTom
|
9.4174 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | I've always been a closet Steeler fan - even though they suck! | Tue Jan 16 1996 11:15 | 4 |
9.4176 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Tue Jan 16 1996 11:23 | 4 |
|
Yes they did Karen. Cowboys whupped 'em 27-10.
Claybone
|
9.4177 | Until they publish these unwritten rules | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 16 1996 11:32 | 21 |
| Well betting on nfl games and especially the playoffs and superbowl is
of such volume that the nfl has to reckon with it and has. The obvious
ways has to do with consistent injury reports and trying to remove that
angle from the big bettors. I'm sure Las Vegas and the commissioners
office have some kind of working relationship (to say the least).
One other area that was a big problem had to do with offensive holding
which could hardly be avoided and finally was virtually allowed with
some loose conditions allowed. So now we have Erik Williams vs Reggie
White. What's a ref to do :-)
Now on the deliberate pick that allowed Deion's catch. How is that
"cheating"? Isn't it only cheating when there are no refs? Where do
you draw the line? We had this with Travis Ford (btw is he playing in
nba? I saw a ford on a box score at guard is that him?) taking foul
shots and getting skewered. I say let the refs call it and the rest
goes unless you have near unanimity that something shouldn't be done
(eg biting).
In fact the use of replay to control violence I'm in favor of but
to fine Novacek for the pick would begin the final ruination of sport.
|
9.4178 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:03 | 13 |
|
>> As for luck, you left out a minor piece of the puzzle: they was lucky to
>> play the Colts at the Burgh and not the Chiefs at Arrowhaid.
Wrong. The Colts shut the Chiefs down cold. We got to see the Colts
alot up here and they're a very good football team. Yes, better than
the Chiefs and they proved it. The Steelers were also lucky that they
faced a Faulk-less Colts. It doesn't matter now, though. The Steelers
are in it and everbody else in the AFc will be watching it at home.
I'd like to see the Steelers make a game of it but I tend to think
that the 14 point spread will be the first 20 point spread for a SB
come game time.
|
9.4179 | think again | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:11 | 6 |
| Uh, not addressing the why and wherefor. Just saying that Pittsburgh was
fortunate to be playing at home.
I'll stand by that.
TTom
|
9.4180 | Superbowl futures? | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:12 | 12 |
| Ttom this movement of the Steelers spread from 11 to 14 and on up
brings up a question I've had before. Is there a secondary market in
Vegas for the chits you get when you make a bet since sports betting is
at a locked in line unlike horse betting where you don't know your odds
until after post time or at payoff time.
So I bet the Cowboys at a mere 11, is there some Guido around I can
sell my chit to when it hits 15 or 17 or 20? If the line went the
other way could I sell it for less somewhere? Will Vegas buy it back.
Sounds like another kind of gambling, more American like the futures
market.
|
9.4181 | good idea | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:14 | 9 |
| Betting futures! I like the idea, billte.
I know some people in the business where they themselves play one line
while giving out another. Anything to add a little edge to the sugar.
FWIW, I don't think this will get past 14 but I could be totally wrong.
If'n it does, we'll know about it soon.
TTom
|
9.4182 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:26 | 9 |
|
>> Uh, not addressing the why and wherefor. Just saying that Pittsburgh
>> was fortunate to be playing at home.
You should have just said that. I don't see the advantage of playing a
very good team at home versus playing a so-so team on the road. The
home field advantage doesn't count for *that* much. It certainly
didn't help KC themselves.
|
9.4183 | sure | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:33 | 14 |
| > You should have just said that.
I did just say that.
"As for luck, you left out a minor piece of the puzzle: they was lucky to
play the Colts at the Burgh and not the Chiefs at Arrowhaid."
Hey, if'n you don't wanna think that home field is a_advantage have it
but both home teams won. Maybe Dallas woulda been willing to play in
Green Bay cause, after all, it don't matter "*that* much" where you play.
Right. Whatever you say...
TTom
|
9.4184 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:50 | 21 |
|
>> I did just say that.
>> "As for luck, you left out a minor piece of the puzzle: they was lucky to
>> play the Colts at the Burgh and not the Chiefs at Arrowhaid."
>> Hey, if'n you don't wanna think that home field is a_advantage have it
>> but both home teams won. Maybe Dallas woulda been willing to play in
>> Green Bay cause, after all, it don't matter "*that* much" where you play.
>> Right. Whatever you say...
You're still confused. What you're essentially saying is not that
Dallas would rather play Green Bay at home than play Green Bay away
but that Dallas would rather play Green Bay at home than a lesser team
away. All I'm saying is that playing at home isn't going to shorten
the gap between playing a Indy and a KC or between playing a Green Bay
and a Philly nearly enough. As we saw Indy played a very good game cert-
ainly well enough to win. KC, on the other hand, played at home *against*
Indy and *LOST*. Home field will only get you so far.
|
9.4185 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:52 | 8 |
| Nice Groaner-like "Spin Doctor" routine, Tommy.
That horeshoe you were refering to is really the
wishbone from the super serving of crow you
devoured.
billl
|
9.4186 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jan 16 1996 12:59 | 16 |
| Regardless of how you feel about the calls, the Steelers are lucky to be
going to the superbowl.
On that last Hail Mary pass they had lost the game. The receiver had the ball
in his lap, out of reach of all the defenders, he had both hands around it and
all he had to do was grab toward his stomach where the ball was sitting and the
Colts would be heading to the superbowl. Instead for some reason he threw his
arms out, the ball rolled on the ground and the Steelers are going to the
superbowl.
If that's not luck from the Steelers point of view I don't know what is. The
colts quite literally had the Superbowl in their lap and let it just roll away.
What a finish. That was one of the most exciting games I've ever seen.
George
|
9.4187 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Jan 16 1996 13:02 | 11 |
9.4188 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | Can the Coach... | Tue Jan 16 1996 13:04 | 17 |
|
Besides Stewart going out of bounds. Does anybody else think that
an illegal motion/procedure penalty should have been called when
Mills caught the ball on the 1 in the 4th quarter? The running back
went in motion/shifted from the slot into the backfield beside
O'Donnell. After the running back was set he lifted his left foot
and started going forward again right before the ball was snapped.
Also when are coaches going to learn how to manage the clock
correctly and play the odds? When Pittsburgh was on the 1 ft line, the
odds are they are going to score a TD. If you let them score the TD on 1st
down, it would have saved the Colts 12 seconds and a timeout. I know
you can cause a fumble, stop them, or a penalty. There is only about a
10% chance of that happening. Save the 12 seconds and the timeout and
try and comeback with a winning TD. As it was they had one last chance.
Ron
|
9.4189 | I AM A REAL FAN | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 13:05 | 0 |
9.4190 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm DTN: 422-7253 | Tue Jan 16 1996 13:21 | 6 |
| >> Back when the Steelers were beating the Cowboys - 70s - Dallas had every
>> right in the book to complain about the officiating. They had plays to
>> complain about in about ever game including a couple of questionable
>> calls deep in the secondary, all of which seemed to go the Burghers way.
Did the complain when Jackie Smith dropped the pass in the endzone?
|
9.4191 | | PTOSS1::SCHRAMME | Eric Schramm DTN: 422-7253 | Tue Jan 16 1996 13:22 | 8 |
| > Pittsburg is just the latest in a long line of med-
> iocre AFC teams to got to and get trounced in the
> SB. Yup, you just scraped by Indy but anyone who
> really thinks that team has a chance against Dallas
> needs to contact me offline. This one will be over
> before the first quarter ends.
This from a guy who predicted great things from the Patriots.
|
9.4192 | no catch, no Hall | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 16 1996 13:27 | 13 |
| > Did the complain when Jackie Smith dropped the pass in the endzone?
No, but ol' Jackie has never been the same. I saw a story where he went
down hill fast after that and he's still convinced that this is the play
that kept him outta the Hall.
The plays I was talking about are the plays involving Drew Pearson for
the Cowboys and Lynn Swann for the Steelers.
Just so Tommy's clear, I'm not saying that they were in on the same play.
The calls were lucky, though...
TTom
|
9.4193 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Jan 16 1996 14:05 | 22 |
|
> Also when are coaches going to learn how to manage the clock
> correctly and play the odds? When Pittsburgh was on the 1 ft line, the
> odds are they are going to score a TD. If you let them score the TD on 1st
> down, it would have saved the Colts 12 seconds and a timeout. I know
> you can cause a fumble, stop them, or a penalty. There is only about a
> 10% chance of that happening. Save the 12 seconds and the timeout and
> try and comeback with a winning TD.
I'm glad someone else feels this way!
I was arguing this with my brother during the game and have called for
this *many* times during a Pats game.
Onliest thing I can think of is that it is somehow not percieved as
"clock management." There seems to be some He Man Football Taboo
about not allowing a TD, even if it's in your team's best interest.
After the catch on the 1/2 yard line, I say, just give them the TD,
and quickly get your offense back on the field.
- Sean
|
9.4194 | Thought Of It Too | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 16 1996 15:35 | 6 |
| I have to admit that I thought the exact same thing. For most
teams, the probability of victory is much greater to allow the
team to score and to need to score a TD with a lot more time
on your hands.
Tony
|
9.4195 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jan 16 1996 15:43 | 23 |
| There is one type of score I've seen teams allow.
When teams are on their own 1 or 2 with their back to the endzone on 4th and
long I've seen the QB take the ball and run through his own endzone for a
safety so that the kicker wouldn't have to punt from inside his own endzone.
Other than that I don't know of any time where anyone gives up points,
especially if it means giving up the lead.
I guess the question is this:
- What percentage of the time does a team on the 1 get into the endzone?
Probably pretty good.
- What percentage of the time does a team take a kickoff then go score
in less than 1:30 (or what ever)
Probably not as good.
If that's so then the odds are with trying to stop the score.
George
|
9.4196 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Tue Jan 16 1996 15:52 | 40 |
|
> I guess the question is this:
>
> - What percentage of the time does a team on the 1 get into the endzone?
>
> Probably pretty good.
>
> - What percentage of the time does a team take a kickoff then go score
> in less than 1:30 (or what ever)
>
> Probably not as good.
>
> If that's so then the odds are with trying to stop the score.
Possibly the right conclusion; definitely the wrong reasons.
Say that a team on the 1 scores a TD 90% of the time, and a FG
8% of the time.
Say that a team receiving a kickoff with 1:30 left scores a TD 25% of the
time.
Say that a team receiving a kickoff with 1:20 left scores a TD 20% of the
time.
Say you're down by 3, your opponent has the ball, 1st and 1, with 1:40
left.
If you try to stop them, you have a 8% chance of a tie, a 2% of a win
with no further scoring, and a 18% chance of both teams scoring.
Assuming ties break 50/50, your chance of winning is 24%.
If you let them in, you have a 25% chance of both teams scoring. Your
chance of winning is 25%.
I have no idea what the actual numbers are, but the above is a scenario
where letting the other team score is the best possible choice.
Joe
|
9.4197 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Tue Jan 16 1996 16:16 | 11 |
| Well, 24% and 25% are pretty close, well within the margin of error for the
estimates you are using. I like the 90%, that sounds about right for scoring
from the 1 on 1st down but I'm not sure I like the 20% and 25% for teams
scoring a TD with 1:30, 1:40 on the clock.
Even without a time restriction when the defense knows you have to throw I'm
not sure a team scores a touchdown one out of 4 or 5 times they get the ball on
their own 20. Maybe they score something that many times but if they have to
get into the endzone it probably wouldn't be worth the gamble.
George
|
9.4198 | Sure, Pittsburgh finally caught a break-- 'bout damned time! | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl! | Tue Jan 16 1996 16:25 | 26 |
|
Indy needed a TD and not a FG. With the 4-point spread, I think
they're better off trying to stuff that run three times (maybe
four, if the opponent gambles and goes for the TD). It's been done.
Many many times. Each time you make a stop it eats time, but also
increases the pressure on the opponent. It's better to play it
out, I think.
Dumber decisions were the two times that Harbaugh decided to run
on that last drive. He picked up good yardage but it wasn't worth
it given the game situation. A smart QB should run out of downs
before he runs out of time when given 1:30 at the end of the game,
even with only one TO remaining. The near-success of the miraculous
Hail Mary notwithstanding...
The Steelers were unlucky... then lucky... then unlucky... then lucky.
So what. It was an evenly-played game, and someone had to win. If
Indy had won, they'd also have been "lucky" (that's what the damned
thing came down to, luck), but we'd still have a Tommy in here
trying to tell us that no, the Colts demonstrated that they were
clearly the better team; the Steelers' lack of accomplishment
"exactly what their talent would merit". I'm still looking for
a little consistency, year to year, day to day... ;-)
glenn
|
9.4199 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Tue Jan 16 1996 16:44 | 4 |
| For a lttle refresher, Tommie, take a gander at .4113
billl
|
9.4200 | Good ol' baseball and football... who cares about the rest... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pittsburgh goin' to the Super Bowl! | Tue Jan 16 1996 18:30 | 22 |
|
> But the way we expect calls to go the "media darlings" or the hometown
> team is all part of it. I just can't believe that it is a mere coincidence
> that the Steelers and the Cowboys are in the Super Bowl. It's what NBC
> and half the country wanted.
Except the AFC has sent some real "media dogs" to the Super Bowl
over the past decade. Teams that have sent TV ratings reeling,
to plummet only further after the opening kickoff. By these standards
Buffalo would never have made it, for almost every reason imaginable.
Now we finally have Pittsburgh-Dallas III with some sense of history
there. That's a _good_ thing, and high time, but not because someone
fixed it.
The NBA still has clear bragging rights over the NFL as far as the
games being comic farce. And the knock on MLB not even being
worthy of consideration in the equation is a compliment as far as
baseball fans are concerned. The more the game gets stripped down
due to "poverty" the better.
glenn
|
9.4201 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Tue Jan 16 1996 20:18 | 13 |
|
> -< Good ol' baseball and football... who cares about the rest... >-
I only really follow Pro Football and College Basketball. For me,
the biggest factor is the % of a season each game is. In both the
above, every game means something. In baseball, you can lose a sweep
and basically who gives a crap, you can still do well in the standings.
A interminally long sports season means a terminally bored Sean.
The other thing is the effect of coaching. Tell me, does anyone listen
to NBA coaches (asking seriously, it just looks like not)?
- Sean
|
9.4202 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NCAA Baseball in less 2 weeks | Wed Jan 17 1996 08:32 | 24 |
| Sorry, I was out yesterday, so this is old:
> <<< Note 9.4157 by OLD1S::CADZILLA2 "Field Service Tool Pusher" >>>
>
> Was a defender standing next to Novacek when he ran into the man
> coming across the middle with Sanders. So Novachek is suppose to have
> run over in front of one man and wait to pick off the other when he
> came by. Now that takes some doing. All that was shown is Novachek
> running into the defender. It did not show how it got put into that
> position.
>
> Like I said I played that position, a pass catching tight
> end is much smaller than an inside Lb and can therefore be put into
> most any position the lb wants when within the five yard zone. In a
> passing situation the tight end is one of the lb's responsibiliy.
First, the replay did show the entire play from the line of scrimmage.
Novacek was not blocked into the defender covering Sanders. It was
OBVIOUSLY an illegal pick the officials did not call. No question
at all about it. Having seen the replay, ONLY a biased individual
could not see it should have been called.
It didn't make any difference; Favre's play was the difference in this
game.
|
9.4203 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NCAA Baseball in less 2 weeks | Wed Jan 17 1996 08:37 | 10 |
| > <<< Note 9.4165 by LUDWIG::BARBIERI >>>
> -< Lamenting The Cowboy Blues >-
> The owner wants his face on the screen every moment. The team's
> 'cap' seems to be several million dollars above the 2nd highest
> team (and by the way...here I fault the 49'ers as well), they give
Why the 49'ers ? Did you know that with salaries and bonuses combined,
the amount they paid to their players was 24th out of 30 teams this
past year ?
|
9.4204 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Wed Jan 17 1996 08:52 | 14 |
|
> Why the 49'ers ? Did you know that with salaries and bonuses combined,
> the amount they paid to their players was 24th out of 30 teams this
> past year ?
They just beat everybody to the punch. When they were involved,
salaries were just cheaper, and they got the longer term contracts
for less money.
Like the Pats with Drew. Lotsa bucks now, but what will a 7 year
contract for the #1 be in a few years.
- Sean
|
9.4205 | 49'ers/Factoring In The Human Element | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 17 1996 09:02 | 31 |
| re: -1
I thought Policy, while obeying the 'letter' of the law,
conflicted with the 'spirit' of the law. Didn't they
pro-rate contracts up the ying-yang? (is that a word?)
Basically, what that does is the following. The spirit
of the whole salary cap issue is that some teams cannot continue
having these huge payrolls. The letter of the law tries
to meet the spirit of the law and it fails. It does not
foresee all the ways people can still shell out humongous
bucks and yet stay within those guidelines.
I elaborated, but I think they basically pro-rated those
contracts so that a lot of money goes to players after the cap
contract runs out.
On letting people score...
One other factor and that is the human element. We can
use statistics all we want, but what does it mean to a
team's (especially the defense) psyche when it is told
to 'lay down' and let a team just score a TD on you? How
does one incorporate that into the mix?
I wonder if you just have to try to stop them and maintain
a certain mentality with your entire team and your defensive
unit especially.
Tony
|
9.4206 | | SLEEPR::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jan 17 1996 09:13 | 24 |
| What do you bet if teams started letting other teams score then when the full
back or QB saw he was going to be allowed to walk into the endzone he'd just
stand around and let the clock run down anyway.
Of course at 1st there would be confusion, illegal receivers down field, etc
but eventually there would be set plays like the Kneel Down play where the
offense just stood in certain positions waiting for the defense to make a move
before running or throwing into the endzone.
My cats do that. When they fight there's usually this long period where they
just sit there looking at each other. It's this "who ever moves 1st gets
creamed" type of game.
I understand that when helicopters fight it's the same sort of thing. Some
people call helicopter fights "cat fights" rather than "dog fights" for just
that reason. They hover out of each other's range for a long period of time
edging around for position then all of a sudden one makes a quick move at the
other and it's all over one way or the other in a few seconds.
Now that would add something to the game of football. If you think people
complain about the standing around that goes on for instant replay imagine
the noise we'd here over this type of play.
George
|
9.4207 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Wed Jan 17 1996 10:44 | 14 |
| > I understand that when helicopters fight it's the same sort of thing. Some
>people call helicopter fights "cat fights" rather than "dog fights" for just
>that reason. They hover out of each other's range for a long period of time
>edging around for position then all of a sudden one makes a quick move at the
>other and it's all over one way or the other in a few seconds.
It's even more advanced than that now.
With some of the "radar masts" that they have now on the attack choppers,
they can sit "below sight" with the mast popped up, then they pop up,
shoot and go....
'Saw
|
9.4208 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Wed Jan 17 1996 13:18 | 8 |
| re: betting on NFL exhibitions
Anyone who bets on an NFL exhibition is a twit. Betting on an NFL game
would be a different story, but they sadly are no longer games, they
are now exhibitions. Games must have rules and standards of play, which
the NFL no longer has. A person who bets on the NFL probably also bets
on the WWF.
|
9.4209 | to twit or not to twit | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Wed Jan 17 1996 13:26 | 20 |
| > Anyone who bets on an NFL exhibition is a twit.
Uh, just cause you don't like to do that, it don't make one who does a
twit. You might be able to make the case that anyone who bets on anything
is a twit.
There's a slew of reasons why someone might bet on anything, most of
which apply to exhibition games. As long as there's a final number
posted, it qualifies. Hail, some of the preseason games, for example, are
usually pretty easy to play. San Fran never cares if'n it wins a
preseason game. They're getting ready for the Super Bowl. They are also
considered solid favorites so usually they give up some good points.
That looks like a relatively easy bet to me.
FWIW, I don't know of a Vegas line on WWF.
Of course, all of this is theoretical cause it's all about entertainment
anyway.
TTom
|
9.4210 | rest on my couch and I'll tell you all about it | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Jan 17 1996 13:36 | 11 |
| tom's right in terms of exhibitions, randomness is not the problem tho,
I think Dennis is referring to the outcome being fixed. I personnally
am 99% sure that anyone involved in officiating or the nfl tried to
influence the game the cowboys way their ability to control the line of
scrimmage made them the favorites.
But that was factored into the spread. The final edge wasn't the
Cowboy's dirty play itself, the Raiders don't exactly dominate, but the
thought that White put into the teams mind that the Cowboys had an
"edge". Having now an excuse, even if subconscious, the Packers let up
in the end and lost the game and the points.
|
9.4211 | 8^) | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Wed Jan 17 1996 13:55 | 9 |
| I'd like to make one very small Moderator ruling here:
The only individual, living or dead, who can be referred to
in here as "a twit" is Steve Kasper, coach of the Bruins.
Thank you,
'Saw
|
9.4212 | y'all got a freakin p-name on this? | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Wed Jan 17 1996 14:02 | 0 |
9.4213 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Jan 17 1996 14:21 | 5 |
|
Get off Steve Kasper!!
I just did.
|
9.4214 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | NCAA Baseball in 2 Days | Wed Jan 17 1996 14:39 | 11 |
| > <<< Note 9.4209 by HBAHBA::HAAS "slightly related" >>>
> -< to twit or not to twit >-
>
>> Anyone who bets on an NFL exhibition is a twit.
>
>Uh, just cause you don't like to do that, it don't make one who does a
>twit. You might be able to make the case that anyone who bets on anything
>is a twit.
I'll go beyond that. You might be able to make the case that anyone noting in
::SPROTS is ... uh, never mind.
|
9.4215 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Wed Jan 17 1996 16:58 | 8 |
| I'm not saying that the games are fixed, but I am saying that the way
things have worked out the last few weeks, non calls have had
influences on the games that have affected the point spread. Take away
the pick play and there's a real good chance Dallas doesn't cover the 9
1/2 points. The NFL is reaching the level of the NBA, where it is not
longer a game, but an exhibition, where rules have no bearing on the
play that is allowed. IMHO, it makes the stuff unwatchable.
|
9.4216 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Wed Jan 17 1996 17:04 | 6 |
| Well, you've got the same option as here...
just hit <next unseen> otherwise known as
<next channel>.
billl
|
9.4217 | Much better game in 50s and 60s to watch | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Jan 17 1996 17:42 | 25 |
| Well you had the following:
Pick play - Teams have done it for years except it's usually caught
or not so blatant. I'd call it one of those things. Also
it is the danger of straight man to man defenses.
Erik Williams Cut back block. Problem is the use of helmet instead of
body. Clip has been legal with 3 yards since I played
on the playground with my leather helmet.
Use of hands to face. Come on, Reggie stop your
whining, Deacon Jones just threw up.
I personally don't see the officials as being much of a factor in the
nfl. Allowing the holding took them out of a big impact area and most
of the calls are pretty obvious. Instant replay is really more of a
problem than the officials since it show stuff that's always happened
except now you notice it and a bored announcer makes it more important
than it really is.
TAKING the officials out of the game by allowing holding and throwing
50 passes a game since the qb can sit behind the sumos so now there is
virtually no guards and tackles athletic enough to pull out on sweeps -
that has ruined pro football.
|
9.4218 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Thu Jan 18 1996 08:02 | 15 |
| If they would just say holding is allowed and let them do what they
want, I could understand it. To randomly call penalties, mostly on the
underdog, is silly, and that is the current situation.
I don't understand why the NFL doesn't review the tape of the game and
fine and/or suspend Williams for the REPEATED infractions, along with
penalizing the official that was told of the infractions in the 1st
quarter by did nothing about it the entire game. The NFL should have
been alerted to the fact that Williams does this alot by watching the
game films from the previous week, where he consistantly went to the
face of WIlliam Fuller. If the NFL does t hat I'll believe that they're
serious about making the NFL a sport. Until then, they might as well
have Hulk Hogan and Jake the Snake Roberts playing in the Superbowl
Exhibition.
|
9.4219 | 3-4 Killed Sweeps | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Thu Jan 18 1996 08:34 | 17 |
| re: .4217
Actually, the thing that almost drove the sweep extinct was much
more the 3-4 defense. This alignment created too much mobility
at outside LB to make the sweep worth it. There was a nationally
televised Packer game where the Pack swept on a 4-3 a few times
and Madden mentioned this. Makes a lot of sense.
Its kind of neat how the game evolves. I think there is a lot to
the idea that huge offensive lines were an response to the 3-4.
Fine, you want to give us only three DL's and prevent much success
with sweeps? OK, we'll throw some humongous giants at you and
just destroy your line.
Now we're having more 4-3's and I think we'll see more sweeps.
Tony
|
9.4220 | This officiating BS has run its course... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | The Immaculate Deflection | Thu Jan 18 1996 09:16 | 18 |
|
I wasn't happy with the officiating in the Dallas-GB game; in that
one particular game, in the final analysis the net result from the
officiating was one-sided, but in the Pittsburgh-Indy game I'm
convinced that the calls evened out (plus, that was a "clean",
hard-hitting, well-played contest in general).
But, nor do have any doubt that the best two teams are in the
Super Bowl, and no rightfully deserving team was barred entry to
the Super Bowl by the officiating. We're getting carried away
here, as Reggie White also did.
I was talking Dallas-Pittsburgh weeks ago, after Dallas nailed down
homefield advantage, and any doubts were removed when Green Bay
took out San Fran.
glenn
|
9.4221 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Thu Jan 18 1996 10:22 | 6 |
|
C'mon Bill. Back in Deacon's day, the haidslap was legal.
I'd bet money ole Reggie woulda had a field day with Erik
if he were allowed to wallop him every pass play.
Claybone
|
9.4222 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Jan 18 1996 10:32 | 2 |
|
You sure, Claybone? I mean, Reggie's a Christian man... :-)
|
9.4223 | Didn't Think of That | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Thu Jan 18 1996 11:05 | 3 |
| re: .4221
Good point.
|
9.4224 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Jan 18 1996 11:28 | 2 |
9.4225 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Field Service Tool Pusher | Thu Jan 18 1996 14:11 | 5 |
|
Green Bay assistant Gil Haskell condition has been upgraded and he
has been moved from the Baylor Medical neurological intensive care unit
to a private room. His motor functions have returned.
|
9.4226 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Jan 18 1996 14:15 | 8 |
| Yeah, Cadz, but if those dirty Cowboys hadn't tried to tackle Robert
Brooks, he'd be OK now... :-) :-) :-)
That's the best news I've heard all week. I mean, I know you assume a
certain risk with being on the sideline, but that was a hell of a thing
to happen to the guy.
To start a new rathole - it wouldn't have happened on a *grass* field.
|
9.4227 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Field Service Tool Pusher | Thu Jan 18 1996 14:41 | 5 |
|
I can vouch for the Texas Stadium turf being hard. I was on the field
when the Russian Cosmos Soccer team played the Dallas Tornado back in
72, working as a rent a pig for Wackenhut. As I've heard Madden say,
it's just carpet over concrete.
|
9.4228 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Fri Jan 19 1996 07:53 | 25 |
| The rules have evolved, especially lately, to favor the offense.
You wanna read a good book about when REAL MEN played in the Pit, and linemen
would have nightmares about defensive linemen, read _Instant_Replay_.
Two moves that defenders used to be able to do were the forearm shiver, and the
head slap. Both are now illegal.
I have no problem with the redefinition of "holding", as it is written, but
it is rarely called that way. Read the John Madden opus
_One_Knee_Equals_Two_Feet for an interesting anecdote about a rules committee
meeting with Vince Lombardi and Madden himself debating what holding really
is and was.
The biggest killer for a defense is the new Pass Interference interpretation.
Personally, I'd like to see the PI call changed to be like college. Ten yards,
never mind spot of the foul. Not when things are so open to a ref having to
decide what it is.
Look at Michael Irvin, the king of the push-off, and you'll see the opposite
side of the coin. Interferes like hell, hardly ever gets caught.
'Saw
|
9.4229 | re: the Haskell injury | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jan 19 1996 09:51 | 4 |
| > As I've heard Madden say, it's just carpet over concrete.
Has George Young said the artificial turf had nothing to do with this
injury ???
|
9.4230 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Some gave all | Fri Jan 19 1996 09:55 | 6 |
| Did anyone else hear that Joe Green (of Mean Joe fame) was
fired yesterday by J.Johnson?
billl
|
9.4232 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Fri Jan 19 1996 10:36 | 7 |
| >
>Has George Young said the artificial turf had nothing to do with this
>injury ???
>
No, but you know that a____le is thinking it....
|
9.4233 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Fri Jan 19 1996 11:54 | 3 |
|
Sounds like Roland's trying to pave the way for a Conrad Dobler
comeback.
|
9.4234 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Fri Jan 19 1996 12:21 | 2 |
|
You always have me pegged, Tommy...
|
9.4235 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Jan 19 1996 13:28 | 9 |
| >No, but you know that a____le is thinking it....
Yup, damn tootin'.
I like the Giants, but I'm not a diehard fan. I feel for you guys,
especially with Reeves coming back next year. I *used to* respect
George Young, but he hasn't produced a good decision in so long, and
his smart-ass act on WFAN makes you want to reach through the radio
and smack him one.
|
9.4236 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Fri Jan 19 1996 13:34 | 30 |
| >
>I like the Giants, but I'm not a diehard fan. I feel for you guys,
>especially with Reeves coming back next year. I *used to* respect
>George Young, but he hasn't produced a good decision in so long, and
>his smart-ass act on WFAN makes you want to reach through the radio
>and smack him one.
>
Joe, you just hit the nail on the head.
There comes a time in life when your ability to remain a "player" in the
scheme of things passes you by, and it's time to take that trip to the dog
track. Clearly George Young is in that mode.
Here's a tidbit that explains it in a nutshell:
But Young has lost more than 100 pounds and is healthy. He has a
better handle on the cap and free agency (though, his critics say,
not nearly good enough). He enjoys his job. As the Reeves affair
showed, Young remains the top football power in the organization.
And he is also one of the most influential figures in the NFL.
Young decided it was too much to give up for retirement, so he stayed.
It's gonna be a tough couple of years.
'Saw
|
9.4237 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Jan 23 1996 11:59 | 10 |
|
Reason #437 to root for the Steelers
'Brainless' Barry Switzer says that he contacted the Buffalo
coaching staff about the Super Bowl because he wanted to know
"how not to do it."
|
9.4238 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cheatin' Cowboys suck!!! | Tue Jan 23 1996 12:13 | 13 |
|
finally after having missed on several other opportunities Tony Dungy
has nailed down a head coaching job. Congrats to Tony who will be
taking over as the head coach of the Tampa Bay/(city with the most
outrageous offer) Bucaneers.
Tampa looked like it was starting to turn the corner on respectability
last year it'll be interesting to see if Tony can bring them there.
If Dilfer can improve he's got a good chance. Rhett's a good back
and the defense played well last year. Tough to win though when your
offense can't score 20 consistently.
mike
|
9.4239 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Wed Jan 24 1996 08:21 | 10 |
| Nice six year contract too.
Give the guy time to try and do something.
Dungy was one name that I kept hearing come up for a possible job with the
Giants, before George Young had a brain fart and kept the Collie Lover on
for another year.
'Saw
|
9.4240 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Wed Jan 24 1996 08:21 | 7 |
| In other news, Bill Walsh signs on with San Fran as offensive coordinator.
Despite what he's saying, I'm wondering what Seiffert is really feeling?
'Saw
|
9.4241 | desperate measures.... | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Wed Jan 24 1996 09:20 | 4 |
| >In other news, Bill Walsh signs on with San Fran as offensive coordinator.
When your hands are tied up with players' salaries, change the coaching
staff....
|
9.4242 | Not the OC | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Wed Jan 24 1996 22:19 | 10 |
| Bill Walsh was not named offensive coordinator. He is an advisor to
the offensive coordinator and his title is Assistant Head Coach. The
49'ers have another Assistant Head Coach, who is only an advisor to the
defensive coordinator, but I forget his name. In an interview, Walsh
stated that he will NOT be involved in any decision making processes.
I'm not sure how true that will be, or if it is true, how long it will
last. I think Walsh needs to be involved in the decision making
process.
D.J.
|
9.4243 | | CAM::WAY | Dress to the right and cover down | Thu Jan 25 1996 07:41 | 10 |
| Well, you have to forgive me.
When I hear the WFAN 20/20 sports just after the alarm goes off, sometimes I'm
still half out of it, so I just get the general gist of it.
You know those guys in the Coast commercials, who, to quote Chris Berman, are
"stumblin' and bumblin'" in the morning? They're wide awake and ready to go
compared to me when I get out of the rack.
'Sa
|
9.4244 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:01 | 3 |
|
If Dan Dierdorf doesn't do MNF, does he make it into the Hall Of
Fame?
|
9.4245 | Can't figure out this Pro Football HOF business... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:07 | 19 |
|
> If Dan Dierdorf doesn't do MNF, does he make it into the Hall Of
> Fame?
Billte and I were talking about this at lunch yesterday. Probably
not, but in fairness MNF only offsets the disadvantage of playing
for the St Louis Cardinals all those years. More than in any other
sports HOF, championship rings count big with the NFL.
More puzzling to me is the question of how/why two specific players
named Mike Haynes and Mike Webster have to put up with the "wait your
turn" selection process that NFL uses (both will eventually get in).
The only thing that bars both from automatic first-year entry is the
fact that neither is a huge household name. But each is "only" one of
the very best to ever play his position, and to do so for many many
years on top of that.
glenn
|
9.4246 | he were good | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:08 | 15 |
| In all fairness to Dierdorf, he was one of the better offensive lineman
to play the game.
Way back in the days of billte, you barely knew the linemen, especially
on offense. Conrad Dobler got more ink that Dan but mostly cause he had
the image of being crazy and bad in the great tradition of Ray Nietske
and Dick Butkus. Problem was, ol' Conrad weren't that good otherwise. The
mainstay of the line for the Cards was Dierdorf.
I'm sure MNF helped his chances out.
However, just being on the broadcast side of things doesn't necessarily
get you into the hall. Just ask Lynn Swann who got jobbed again.
TTom
|
9.4247 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:13 | 1 |
9.4248 | When Giants (and Lions) ruled the land... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:14 | 10 |
|
> Way back in the days of billte, you barely knew the linemen, especially
> on offense.
Billte insisted that he knew and thought highly of Lou Creekmur, but
still couldn't remember anything particularly distinguishing about
him... ;-)
glenn
|
9.4249 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:27 | 4 |
| > If Dan Dierdorf doesn't do MNF, does he make it into the Hall Of
> Fame?
If anything, I think his MNF stint would work against him... :-)
|
9.4250 | outta the main stream | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:32 | 4 |
| I would think so too, but remember, if'n it were up to us, Dierdorf
wouldn't be on the MNF team. Neither would them other 2 bimbos.
TTom
|
9.4251 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:39 | 12 |
|
I've always argued in favor of Swann over Stallworth. Because of
his injuries (the concussions) Swann didn't get the longterm career
benefit of playing many years in the NFL's Golden Offensive Era,
but there weren't many better for the big plays, in the big games.
Still, Swann doesn't stack up relative to the greats at his position
like Haynes and Webster do. I can't figger it with those two.
Wasn't Haynes even named to the 75-Year team? How then can he not
be in the HOF?
glenn
|
9.4252 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:41 | 3 |
|
Yup, Haynes was a corner on the NFL 75 year team. I think Woodson
may have been the other.
|
9.4253 | Haynes, Webster: good as ever | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:44 | 14 |
| Haynes and Webster are as good at their positions as anyone presently
enshrined in Canton.
Swann had a bad rep, not unlike Cris Carter of the Vikings. He was looked
upon as soft and unwilling to go over the middle and take a hit. The fack
of the matter is that he was a_unbelievable talent. Personally, however,
I liked Stallworth better. The best tribute to Stallworth was that he was
conistently named by his teammates as their MVP. 'Nuff said.
As for golden eras, this are them. About ever record of note for
receivers was broken thised year. Most yards, most catches, most over 100
catches, most over 1000 yards. They beat all them ol' AFL standards.
TTom
|
9.4254 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Jan 30 1996 13:33 | 5 |
| re: Lynn Swann
Pure talent should count for more than it appears to. And numbers count
way too much. Terrance Mathis is a perfect example of a WR being in the
right offense. And injuries should be considered.
|
9.4255 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Cheatin' Cowboys suck!!! | Tue Jan 30 1996 15:21 | 5 |
| with Swann it's the Cowboys factor. He personally torched them bad in
two Superbowl so all the Dallas lovers refuse to vote for him. Kinda
like Albert Belle's antiblock that cost him the MVP this year.....
mike
|
9.4256 | These are great... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Tue Jan 30 1996 15:31 | 10 |
|
> with Swann it's the Cowboys factor. He personally torched them bad in
> two Superbowl so all the Dallas lovers refuse to vote for him. Kinda
> like Albert Belle's antiblock that cost him the MVP this year.....
Keep 'em coming, MikeC! ;-)
glenn
|
9.4257 | Next batter... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Thu Feb 01 1996 15:44 | 8 |
|
Breaking news... ESPN is reporting that the Seattle Seahawks are
headed to Los Angeles. Seahawks are claiming that they've been
violated (many times in recent years, matter of fact-- well,
actually it's that their Kingdome lease has been violated...)
glenn
|
9.4258 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Feb 01 1996 16:03 | 4 |
9.4259 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Feb 02 1996 12:43 | 7 |
| > Dallas papers are already reporting that Emmitt is going home to south
> Florida to play for Jimmy if Jones doesn't pay him more than Peon.
Tough to pay that kind of money to an RB with all the miles this guy has
logged. Will he be another Payton or Allen and defy aging ? Or will
father time soon arrive, as it does with nearly all backs, after they've
gone beyond 5 years ?
|
9.4260 | dinged but still HoF | HBAHBA::HAAS | slightly related | Fri Feb 02 1996 12:45 | 12 |
| At this point in his career, you'd have to say Emmitt is more dinged than
either Payton or Allen. Both had/have a_uncanny way of avoiding the big
hits. Emmitt has taken his share and it shows with his problems with his
wheels such as hamstrings, etc.
However, barring something more serious, Emmitt has at least a couple
more Hall of Fame years in him, not to mention a market appeal.
Besides, if Jimmy Johnson caint sign him, he'll just lower the price of
the tickets.
TTom
|
9.4261 | "What You Sow, So Shall Ye Reap" | LUDWIG::BARBIERI | | Fri Feb 02 1996 13:35 | 13 |
| This shows what an absolute fool Jones was to sign Deion
to that kind of money.
Look at it from Smith's perspective. He knows about the
RB's aging process better than we could. He knows he can't
last forever because of that. He also sees Deion avoid hitting
(as in Bam Morris' run up the left sideline) and sees this
guy with this ridiculous contract who will probably be able
to play well beyond his own years.
This is beautiful!!!
Tony
|
9.4262 | firsted Stiller free agent lost... | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | still a 'Stiller' fan | Tue Feb 06 1996 10:57 | 9 |
| Ron "I hate the air"-heardt was signed by the Jests
along with the Steelers' tight end coach.
Kotite was on Sportcenter lasted night sported a well
polished woodie.
billl
|
9.4263 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Feb 06 1996 11:04 | 1 |
9.4264 | | CAM::WAY | When can their glory fade? | Wed Feb 07 1996 09:08 | 13 |
| The Jets had to do something.
All that talk on WFAN is that the Jets are basically an expansion team.
Basically, that means that their talent is so poor, their coaching is so poor
that they might as well consider themselves an expansion team and draft
accordingly.
What I heard reported was that Galley, the WR coach of the Steelers was the one
who lobbied hard to open up the offense after Pittsburgh's three losses. The
formations, and use of Stewart was his idea, not Earhardt's.
'Saw
|
9.4265 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | still a 'Stiller' fan | Wed Feb 07 1996 09:45 | 12 |
| >What I heard reported was that Galley, the WR coach of
>the Steelers was the one who lobbied hard to open up the
>offense after Pittsburgh's three losses. The formations,
>and use of Stewart was his idea, not Earhardt's.
I had read the same thing. This was what caused the
rift between Earhardt and Cowher. Not only was it
not his idea, but he was dead set against it.
billl
|
9.4266 | I'm anal about this, but to er is human... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Wed Feb 07 1996 13:30 | 7 |
|
Why do we keep spelling Earhardt a la Amelia in here? As has
been pointed out, just as there was no "O" in "J_e Walt_n",
there's no "Air" in Erhardt...
glenn
|
9.4267 | close analysis | HBAHBA::HAAS | Extra low prices and hepatitis too!~ | Wed Feb 07 1996 13:33 | 5 |
| You calling Dale Earnhardt Amelia?
Just you wait until the incendiator hears about this...
TTom
|
9.4268 | | CAM::WAY | There's the devil to pay! | Tue Feb 20 1996 13:34 | 7 |
| Larry Brown of the Cowboys, Super Bowl MVP, is gonna play for the Raiders
nexted season.
Seems the Sowboys didn't have enough money....
'Saw
|
9.4269 | | BSS::JACKSON | Powder Shuffle | Tue Feb 20 1996 13:51 | 3 |
| He signed or just visited? My donkos need a CB.
Tim
|
9.4270 | | CAM::WAY | There's the devil to pay! | Tue Feb 20 1996 13:54 | 4 |
| Report on WFAN was that the Raiders have a press conference scheduled to
announce his signing....
'Saw
|
9.4271 | | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Tue Feb 20 1996 13:56 | 4 |
| > He signed or just visited? My donkos need a CB.
Pray for Aeneas Williams. He's in a different league than Larry "I was
in the right place" Brown.
|
9.4272 | will do | HBAHBA::HAAS | Extra low prices and hepatitis too!~ | Tue Feb 20 1996 14:02 | 0 |
9.4273 | | BSS::JACKSON | Powder Shuffle | Tue Feb 20 1996 17:03 | 4 |
| I would like the Broncos to fly Aeneas(sp?) in, but he might cost too
much if he ended up even being interested in Denver.
Tim
|
9.4274 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Feb 20 1996 17:27 | 2 |
9.4275 | | BSS::JACKSON | Powder Shuffle | Wed Feb 21 1996 09:17 | 9 |
| Mike,
How many "high $$$" players do the cards have?
Swann, Simmons, Hearst....
They still need a qb
Tim
|
9.4276 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Feb 21 1996 10:56 | 8 |
9.4277 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Feb 22 1996 13:05 | 4 |
9.4278 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Thu Feb 22 1996 13:25 | 1 |
| Multi-time Pro Bowl offensive tackle for the Lions.
|
9.4279 | | CAM::WAY | There's the devil to pay! | Thu Feb 29 1996 08:24 | 5 |
| Press conference later today will announce that Neil O'Donnell has signed
a five year deal with the Jets.....
'Saw
|
9.4280 | Neil a Jet | HBAHBA::HAAS | Extra low prices and hepatitis too!~ | Thu Feb 29 1996 10:02 | 5 |
| I heard this on the way to work.
Something about 5 mil signing bonus.
TTom
|
9.4281 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Feb 29 1996 11:22 | 1 |
9.4282 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Feb 29 1996 13:16 | 6 |
| Just got off the horn with the 'burgh. Looks like it's
a done deal.
billl
|
9.4283 | | CAM::WAY | There's the devil to pay! | Thu Feb 29 1996 13:28 | 5 |
| > Just got off the horn with the 'burgh. Looks like it's
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did it hurt?
|
9.4284 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Feb 29 1996 13:59 | 7 |
| >Did it hurt?
Only when I smile.
billl
|
9.4285 | OD sucks | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Thu Feb 29 1996 14:13 | 7 |
|
This gotta make the Jets the most poorly run team in all of pro
sports. I thought Indy took the cake makin Hairbrain a franchise
player.
Jerry
|
9.4286 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Feb 29 1996 14:52 | 9 |
| just to make it official...
HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. (Feb 29, 1996 - 12:27 EST) -- Neil O'Donnell, who
quarterbacked the Pittsburgh Steelers to the Super Bowl, has agreed
to a five-year deal with the New York Jets worth nearly $25 million.
billl
|
9.4287 | I don't believe nothing from Hempstead ;+} | HBAHBA::HAAS | leap jeer | Thu Feb 29 1996 14:58 | 0 |
9.4288 | | BSS::JACKSON | Powder Shuffle | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:23 | 1 |
| Surely this is a joke!
|
9.4289 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Feb 29 1996 16:27 | 5 |
| Don't call me Shirley, and no it's no joke, Roger.
billl
|
9.4290 | Bring on slash!! | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Thu Feb 29 1996 22:38 | 2 |
| O'Donnell is no 5 mil/yr QB. The jests will find that out very early
next season. The poor fools.
|
9.4291 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | The engineer formerly known as Roland | Fri Mar 01 1996 08:54 | 6 |
| You're right about O'Donnell, DJ. But...
>Bring on slash!!
...is foolishness. He's not ready to be an NFL quarterback yet. Hostetler
would be a *great* signing for the Steelers.
|
9.4292 | he's whining whimp... | USCTR1::GARBARINO | | Fri Mar 01 1996 09:59 | 5 |
| >Hostetler would be a *great* signing for the Steelers.
Yeah, but I wanna see the first fight between him and Cower. Hostetler
is one of the biggest babies in the NFL...frequently questioning coaches'
decisions.
|
9.4293 | No "foreign" QB's please | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Fri Mar 01 1996 10:35 | 12 |
| I honestly don't believe that "Slash" will or should start, although
I wouldn't be surprised to see him take a lot more snaps this season
than he took last season. I'm not too thrilled with the idea of
Hostetler. I never thought of him as much of a QB even when he was
playing for WVU. None of the FA quarterback's look that impressive
to me (certainly not worth the money they would have to pay to get
them). I honestly believe that Pittsburgh should go with Jim
Miller with "Slash" coming in a lot more often than he did last
season. It gives the offense the air of unpredictability which I
think they will need without a solid starter at QB.
D. J.
|
9.4294 | one can only hope | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Fri Mar 01 1996 12:01 | 5 |
| ...as long as the Steelers dump Tomscak!
billl
|
9.4295 | Nightmare is an understatement..... | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Fri Mar 01 1996 12:09 | 4 |
| If Tomczak is a Steeler next year, I think I'll be watching more
of the Penguins. That guy IS the worst QB in the league.
D. J.
|
9.4296 | Re-posted with total permission of the No Fun League... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Pride of Steel | Wed Mar 13 1996 17:48 | 269 |
|
What the hell; here's the 1996 schedule of opponents for all teams:
1996 NFL OPPONENTS DETERMINED
The opponents for all 1996 regular season NFL games have
been determined and a complete list of each team's matchups is
detailed below.
The official schedule, with playing dates and times, will be
announced next spring.
The 1996 regular season will begin on NFL Kickoff Weekend,
September 1-2, and conclude on December 23.
Wild Card Playoff Games will be played on Saturday and
Sunday, December 28-29; Divisional Playoff Games on the
weekend of January 4-5, 1997; and the AFC and NFC
Championship Games on Sunday, January 12.
Super Bowl XXXI at the Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans,
Louisiana will be held on Sunday, January 26.
The annual AFC-NFC Pro Bowl Game will be in Honolulu,
Hawaii on Sunday, February 2.
The annual preseason Pro Football Hall of Fame Game in
Canton, Ohio, this year between the Indianapolis Colts (AFC)
and New Orleans Saints (NFC), will be played on Saturday,
July 27.
In 1996, all 30 NFL teams will play eight games within their
division (home and away with four other divisional teams), four
intraconference games (games within their conference out of
the division), and four interconference games (games against
teams in a division of the other conference). For interconference
games, each team in a division will play four of the five teams
in the division of the other conference on a rotating basis.
Interconference games next season will pit the AFC East against
the NFC East, the AFC Central against the NFC West and the
AFC West against the NFC Central.
1996 OPPONENTS
AFC EAST
1. Buffalo
HOME: Indianapolis, Miami, New England, New York Jets,
Cincinnati, Kansas City, Dallas, Washington
AWAY: Indianapolis, Miami, New England, New York Jets,
Pittsburgh, Seattle, New York Giants, Philadelphia
2. Indianapolis
HOME: Buffalo, Miami, New England, New York Jets,
Cleveland, San Diego, Arizona, Philadelphia
AWAY: Buffalo, Miami, New England, New York Jets,
Cincinnati, Kansas City, Dallas, Washington
3. Miami
HOME: Buffalo, Indianapolis, New England, New York Jets,
Pittsburgh, Seattle, Dallas, New York Giants
AWAY: Buffalo, Indianapolis, New England, New York Jets,
Houston, Oakland, Arizona, Philadelphia
4. New England
HOME: Buffalo, Indianapolis, Miami, New York Jets, Denver,
Jacksonville, Arizona, Washington
AWAY: Buffalo, Indianapolis, Miami, New York Jets,
Cleveland, San Diego, Dallas, New York Giants
5. N.Y. Jets
HOME: Buffalo, Indianapolis, Miami, New England, Houston,
Oakland, New York Giants, Philadelphia
AWAY: Buffalo, Indianapolis, Miami, New England, Denver,
Jacksonville, Arizona, Washington
AFC CENTRAL
1. Pittsburgh
HOME: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Jacksonville, Buffalo,
San Diego, St. Louis, San Francisco
AWAY: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Jacksonville, Kansas
City, Miami, Atlanta, Carolina
2. Cincinnati
HOME: Cleveland, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Denver,
Indianapolis, Atlanta, New Orleans
AWAY: Cleveland, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Buffalo,
San Diego, St. Louis, San Francisco
3. Houston
HOME: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Kansas
City, Miami, Carolina, San Francisco
AWAY: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, New
York Jets, Seattle, Atlanta, New Orleans
4. Cleveland
HOME: Cincinnati, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, New
England, Oakland, New Orleans, St. Louis
AWAY: Cincinnati, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh, Denver,
Indianapolis, Carolina, San Francisco
5. Jacksonville
HOME: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Pittsburgh, New York
Jets, Seattle, Atlanta, Carolina
AWAY: Cincinnati, Cleveland, Houston, Pittsburgh, New
England, Oakland, New Orleans, St. Louis
AFC WEST
1. Kansas City
HOME: Denver, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle, Indianapolis,
Pittsburgh, Chicago, Green Bay
AWAY Denver, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle, Buffalo,
Houston, Detroit, Minnesota
2. San Diego
HOME: Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, Seattle, Cincinnati,
New England, Detroit, Tampa Bay
AWAY: Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, Seattle, Indianapolis,
Pittsburgh, Chicago, Green Bay
3. Seattle
HOME: Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego, Buffalo,
Houston, Green Bay, Minnesota
AWAY: Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego,
Jacksonville, Miami, Detroit, Tampa Bay
4. Denver
HOME: Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle, Cleveland,
New York Jets, Chicago, Tampa Bay
AWAY: Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle, Cincinnati,
New England, Green Bay, Minnesota
5. Oakland
HOME: Denver, Kansas City, San Diego, Seattle, Jacksonville,
Miami, Detroit, Minnesota
AWAY: Denver, Kansas City, San Diego, Seattle, Cleveland,
New York Jets, Chicago, Tampa Bay
NFC EAST
1. Dallas
HOME: Arizona, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington,
Atlanta, Green Bay, Indianapolis, New England
AWAY: Arizona, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington,
Chicago, San Francisco, Buffalo, Miami
2. Philadelphia
HOME: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Washington,
Carolina, Detroit, Buffalo, Miami
AWAY: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Washington,
Atlanta, Green Bay, Indianapolis, New York Jets
3. Washington
HOME: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia,
Chicago, San Francisco, Indianapolis, New York Jets
AWAY: Arizona, Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia, St.
Louis, Tampa Bay, Buffalo, New England
4. New York Giants
HOME: Arizona, Dallas, Philadelphia, Washington, Minnesota,
New Orleans, Buffalo, New England
AWAY: Arizona, Dallas, Philadelphia, Washington, Carolina,
Detroit, Miami, New York Jets
5. Arizona
HOME: Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington,
St. Louis, Tampa Bay, Miami, New York Jets
AWAY: Dallas, New York Giants, Philadelphia, Washington,
Minnesota, New Orleans, Indianapolis, New England
NFC CENTRAL
1. Green Bay
HOME: Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota, Tampa Bay,
Philadelphia, San Francisco, Denver, San Diego
AWAY: Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, Dallas, St.
Louis, Kansas City, Seattle
2. Detroit
HOME: Chicago, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, Atlanta,
New York Giants, Kansas City, Seattle
AWAY: Chicago, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay,
Philadelphia, San Francisco, Oakland, San Diego
3. Chicago
HOME: Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, Dallas, St.
Louis, Oakland, San Diego
AWAY: Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay, New
Orleans, Washington, Denver, Kansas City
4. Minnesota
HOME: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Tampa Bay, Arizona,
Carolina, Denver, Kansas City
AWAY: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Tampa Bay, Atlanta,
New York Giants, Seattle, Oakland
5. Tampa Bay
HOME: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, New Orleans,
Washington, Oakland, Seattle
AWAY: Chicago, Detroit, Green Bay, Minnesota, Arizona,
Carolina, Denver, San Diego
NFC WEST
1. San Francisco
HOME: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, St. Louis, Dallas,
Detroit, Cincinnati, Cleveland
AWAY: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, St. Louis, Green Bay,
Washington, Houston, Pittsburgh
2. Atlanta
HOME: Carolina, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco,
Minnesota, Philadelphia, Houston, Pittsburgh
AWAY: Carolina, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco,
Dallas, Detroit, Cincinnati, Jacksonville
3. St. Louis
HOME: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, San Francisco, Green
Bay, Washington, Cincinnati, Jacksonville
AWAY: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, San Francisco,
Arizona, Chicago, Cleveland, Pittsburgh
4. Carolina
HOME: Atlanta, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco, New
York Giants, Tampa Bay, Cleveland, Pittsburgh
AWAY: Atlanta, New Orleans, St. Louis, San Francisco,
Minnesota, Philadelphia, Houston, Jacksonville
5. New Orleans
HOME: Atlanta, Carolina, St. Louis, San Francisco, Arizona,
Chicago, Houston, Jacksonville
AWAY: Atlanta, Carolina, St. Louis, San Francisco, New York
Giants, Tampa Bay, Cincinnati, Cleveland
|
9.4297 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Fri Apr 12 1996 17:26 | 21 |
|
If you ever had any doubts that money and power are no
measure of intelligence and horse sense then consider that
Warren Sapp had his draft stock drop because of *rumors*
that he had tested postive for marijuana while at UMiami
and Lawrence Philips, the woman beater and poster boy for
the "What's Wrong With College Athletics?" folks, is seeing
his stock rise despite being convicted of assaulting a female
student. The message from the NFL powers is obviously the same
as the message from Philips' college coach Tom Osborne - violent
crime is acceptable because hey, it's a violent game but we don't
want none of them hippie pot smokers. In a perfect world, Warren
Sapp's pot smoking would have carried as much stigma as a college
kid smoking pot ought to - none. And in a perfect world Lawrence
Philips would find him self getting used to the smell of gasoline ,
the feeling of oil-stained clothes and the constant ringing of the
bell signalling another customer at the gas station. Instead,
Warren lost a ton of money and Philips will make a ton of money.
Vincent Brown found out the hard way that players are nothing
but commodities and now the coed that Philips assaulted is learn-
ing the same thing.
|
9.4298 | what a dope... | SALEM::DODA | A common disaster | Fri Apr 12 1996 18:06 | 10 |
| In this week's TSN, it's been reported that sources in Dallas
have stated that they had intended on letting Irvin walk (despite
the evidence) thinking that he'd aid in the investigation.
Instead, he came in to the grand jury dressed like Huggy Bear
(the models came in dressed like choir girls and his buddy wore a
business suit), and made a mockery of the proceedings by signing
autographs (Tommy, free), opening the door to the outer lobby to
offer do-nuts to the reporters and calling for a pizza.
daryll
|
9.4299 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Fri Apr 12 1996 20:04 | 5 |
|
Well said Tommy. Can't agree more.
Marc
|
9.4300 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375 | Fri Apr 12 1996 21:14 | 3 |
|
I agree with Tommy 100% on this topic, and the general state of
sports. It's sad.
|
9.4301 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Mon Apr 15 1996 10:01 | 4 |
| I just want to thank Daryll for the "Huggy Bear" reference. Talk about
your campy '70s characters - this really put a smile on my face.
And, oh, Michael Irvin? He deserves whatever he gets...
|
9.4302 | just wonderin | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Apr 16 1996 13:36 | 2 |
| wasn't that the guy on starsky and hutch???
|
9.4303 | | SALEM::DODA | A common disaster | Tue Apr 16 1996 13:41 | 1 |
| yup.
|
9.4304 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Apr 16 1996 14:26 | 6 |
| Daryll,
I've been laughing all day about that image you conjured up this morning of
"Huggy Bear."
That and Cornholio really made my week....
|
9.4305 | whattabout Mitchell and the Jets? | HBAHBA::HAAS | floor,chair,couch,bed | Wed Apr 24 1996 11:59 | 9 |
| Could someone explain what the Jets just did?
Firsted of all, the put the franchise label on Johnny Mitchell,
malcontent extrodinaire. Then they waive him cause nobody made a serious
offer which is how it works when you "franchise" the guy.
Is this legal? Smart?
TTom
|
9.4306 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Wed Apr 24 1996 12:42 | 8 |
|
The Jets probably were going to release Johnny Mitchell anyways.
So they label him the franchise player, so if somebody else actually
did want him, they would be compensated in the '97 draft with extra
draft picks. So it was a smart move in terms of trying to acquire
something for nothing, only if they didn't intend to keep him anyways.
Ron
|
9.4307 | nothing for something | HBAHBA::HAAS | floor,chair,couch,bed | Wed Apr 24 1996 12:45 | 9 |
| I can see that logic but as it is, they'll get nothing for him when it
might've been possible, without the franchise tag, to get something for
him.
In any case, Mitchell and the Jets are their own worsted enemies. Somehow
I see Mitchell moving over to the Raiders and the Jets staying in the
cellar no matter...
TTom
|
9.4308 | | BSS::JACKSON | Didn't know a shark could choke | Wed Apr 24 1996 15:23 | 7 |
| I haven't seen but one Jets game in 2-3 years now, so I take it
Mitchell was a bust?
I know my beloved Donkies could use a good backup TE for when Sharpe
goes down.
Tim
|
9.4309 | coulda been | HBAHBA::HAAS | floor,chair,couch,bed | Wed Apr 24 1996 15:30 | 11 |
| Mitchell is a_All-Pro talent and a_All-Bum headcase.
Mostly, he seemed to worry about his stats. But then again, playing for
the Jets, ya have to concentrate on something aside winning, I would
guess.
It'll be interesting to see who picks him up. Whoever does, they should
be ready to start him and go to him often or else be able to listen to
the bellyaching. I don't think he'd settle for playing backup, anywhere.
TTom
|
9.4310 | Blades pleads 'No Contest' | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed May 01 1996 10:51 | 14 |
| Seattle Seahawks receiver Brian Blades pleaded no contest Tuesday to a
manslaughter charge stemming from the death of his cousin in a July 5
shooting. Charles Blades died of a gunshot to the head. The former
University of Miami player was charged with shooting his cousin with a
38-caliber semiautomatic handgun at the player's home. "I want to be able
to prevent any more suffering to Charles' family, my family, my
teammates, my friends and our children," Blades said in a statement to
Broward County Judge Susan Lebow. A sentencing hearing was set for May
28. The no contest plea comes after Blades had claimed his innocence for
months, saying the shooting was an accident.
ripped from the net...
TTom
|
9.4311 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Fri May 03 1996 12:01 | 4 |
| Now that an Earthquake has rocked the Skydome was their any structural
damage? Can the Seahawks owner say I told you that this place wasn't
safe for earthquakes? will we call them the LA Seahawks quicker then we
thought?
|
9.4312 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri May 03 1996 12:39 | 2 |
| I'd like to see the look on his face if they found out there was no
structural damage whatsoever...
|
9.4313 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri May 03 1996 13:10 | 5 |
|
If there was no structural damage, he will say it was only a
5.4 on the richter scale and it could have been worse.
Ron
|
9.4314 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 03 1996 15:02 | 2 |
|
Boston does not have a football team.
|
9.4315 | | PHHSS1::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Fri May 03 1996 18:18 | 4 |
| re: -1
Groaner doesn't have a brain
|
9.4316 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Fri May 03 1996 19:19 | 5 |
|
re: -1
Coming from a bonehead like you, I take that as a compliment.
|
9.4317 | | PHHSS1::DFAUST | Bad Things, man... | Sun May 05 1996 09:11 | 4 |
| re: -1
Direct evidence of the charges in .4315
|
9.4318 | I'll take cocaine for 200 Alex | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon May 06 1996 11:24 | 17 |
| I guess that cocaine is now the official drug of the NFL and ex-NFLers.
LT was busted over the weekend for attempting to buy 100 bucks of crack.
He was at some celebrity pro-am golfing event in Myrtle Beach and
apparently had forgotten to bring his stache. LT's main concern seemed to
be the bad publicity.
And the Main Zany of those Zany Cowboys, Michael Irvin not only bought
cocaine afore he got popped but also after, if'n you believe a Dallas TV
report that supposedly videotaped the early purchase thanks a supposed
buddy of Irvin's idenitified as 'Dennis'. Wail, ol' Dennis ratted Irvin
out and they hid a camera in his car as he drove Irvin to the purchase.
Who says the NFL is the No Fun League!~
TTom
|
9.4319 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon May 06 1996 11:54 | 4 |
|
re: -1
Direct evidence of the charges in .4316
|
9.4320 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Better days are coming bye and bye. BS | Mon May 06 1996 11:55 | 5 |
| >I guess that cocaine is now the official drug of the NFL and ex-NFLers.
You're telling us something new? I have a problem with the ethnic
makeup of the busts vs the reality.
|
9.4321 | arrogant | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Mon May 06 1996 13:18 | 5 |
9.4322 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Tue May 07 1996 14:08 | 5 |
| Mike,
.4298
daryll
|
9.4323 | Michael Irvin | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Tue May 14 1996 12:20 | 4 |
| What is your guess...is Michael Irvin done???
Can we put a fork in the Cowboys? (Four defensive starters gone
plus possibly irvin.)
|
9.4324 | | XTATIC::CHILDS | | Tue May 14 1996 12:54 | 5 |
|
no he's not done but it'll be interesting to see if he draws a suspension. As
for the courts I believe he'll buy his way into a drug rehabilitation program.
mike
|
9.4325 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue May 14 1996 13:40 | 2 |
9.4326 | Cowboys will win # 6 next year for sure | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys Champs Again | Tue May 14 1996 14:01 | 5 |
| Go ahead write the Cowboys off........hahaha.....they will be back in
the big one again next year.......they reload.
Tom
|
9.4327 | just kiddin. | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue May 14 1996 14:14 | 3 |
| -1
looks like you slipped up and meant big house not big one!!!!
|
9.4328 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue May 14 1996 16:15 | 2 |
| What is Irvin being charged with, and what would an average-Joe off the
street get for a penalty if convicted.
|
9.4329 | Obe Year | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Tue May 14 1996 16:29 | 2 |
| I just heard that in Texas its one year mandatory jail sentence.
Lets see if justice is served.
|
9.4330 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Tue May 14 1996 16:33 | 9 |
| > I just heard that in Texas its one year mandatory jail sentence.
> Lets see if justice is served.
Tony, if you drug enforcement in Texas, what is more important to you:
1- putting this guy in the slammer for one year;
2- using this guy to reach-out to youths through public-service
work aimed at drug prevention.
|
9.4331 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Tue May 14 1996 16:52 | 5 |
|
He's lucky this isn't 1970, he would get 20 years minimum. 20 years for
possession on one dobie. Now it's a mindeamnor for less than 4 oz's of
weed, not sure about the charge for candy.
|
9.4332 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Tue May 14 1996 17:00 | 19 |
|
>> Tony, if you drug enforcement in Texas, what is more important to you:
>> 1- putting this guy in the slammer for one year;
>> 2- using this guy to reach-out to youths through public-service
>> work aimed at drug prevention.
It shouldn't even be an option. I don't believe in draconian drug laws
but manadatory should mean mandatory whether he's a Dallas Cowboy or
not. A recent Globe series showed that when it comes to manadatory drug
sentences, smallfry get the max and big fish trade assets for reduced
sentences. Just like the OJ trial showed, money buys a better brand
of justice. Irvin has showed no remorse (even feigned) whatsoever and
kids are smart enough to see through the do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do crap.
Letting him off with public service would serve no purpose but to con-
firm what most of us already suspect about the justice system.
|
9.4333 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue May 14 1996 17:01 | 14 |
|
> Tony, if you drug enforcement in Texas, what is more important to you:
>
> 1- putting this guy in the slammer for one year;
>
> 2- using this guy to reach-out to youths through public-service
> work aimed at drug prevention.
I vote for slammer. That's the best "prevention education" there is.
They've got this jerk on videotape clowning around with some 6-year-old
kid while he's negotiating a coke deal, ferchrissakes...
glenn
|
9.4334 | from da radio | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Tue May 14 1996 17:05 | 3 |
| Just heard Brett Farve is going into drug re-hab.
Tim
|
9.4335 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Tue May 14 1996 17:10 | 4 |
|
How about 1 year in jail and 1 year on probation where he's required to
spend every weekend telling kids the difference between being a
superstar football player and a prisoner!
|
9.4336 | RE: .4333 | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Tue May 14 1996 17:19 | 6 |
|
Dead solid perfect...
The best prevention occurs when there are *no* exceptions.
I like Groaner's idea, but it'll never happen.
|
9.4337 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue May 14 1996 18:32 | 8 |
9.4338 | Say It Isn't So!!! | STRATA::BARBIERI | | Tue May 14 1996 19:07 | 5 |
| You got it Tommy!
WHAT'S THIS ABOUT BRETT FAVRE!!!!!
Tony
|
9.4340 | | DOEIT::CHILDS | | Wed May 15 1996 09:22 | 5 |
|
a lethal combination if ever there was one...............and that's the report
I also read.
mike
|
9.4341 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed May 15 1996 10:03 | 13 |
| The report I heard said that Favre said "he thought he had developed a
dependency."
If that's the case, it would seem he's attained the first step of admitting
that he could have a problem. Some folks never do that.
On the other hand, some of those "rules for being an alcoholic" are kind of
silly --- "Do you drink alone".
Of course I drink alone. I live alone. If I want a beer or a nice glass of
scotch when I'm home I'm drinking alone. Does that make me an alcoholic?
Sheesh...8^)
|
9.4342 | Get another dog to defeat this one... ;-) | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed May 15 1996 10:28 | 9 |
|
> Of course I drink alone. I live alone. If I want a beer or a nice glass of
> scotch when I'm home I'm drinking alone. Does that make me an alcoholic?
Hardcore, baby.
glenn
|
9.4343 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed May 15 1996 10:36 | 11 |
| > -< Get another dog to defeat this one... ;-) >-
I have fish. Do they count?
> Hardcore, baby.
Hi, my name's Frank, and I'm a_alcoholic...
|
9.4344 | They always forget to lose the typewriter. | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 15 1996 10:37 | 7 |
| Well, I don't know about being an alcoholic, but if you find yourself doing
lots of things alone and then you feel the urge to write a manifesto, just
be sure to dispose of the typewriter when you are done.
Got your shack in the woods picked out?
George
|
9.4345 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed May 15 1996 10:54 | 18 |
| >
> Well, I don't know about being an alcoholic, but if you find yourself doing
>lots of things alone and then you feel the urge to write a manifesto, just
>be sure to dispose of the typewriter when you are done.
>
> Got your shack in the woods picked out?
>
> George
Gee, I already wrote my manifesto, but thanks for the information -- I forget
to get rid of the typewriter. I'll have to do that tonight.
I don't have a shack, but there's a big old drain pipe near where I live where
I could hole up for a while.
I'd just have to come out to get beer and scotch. 8^)
|
9.4346 | I'm ansy! | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Wed May 15 1996 14:40 | 11 |
| Well I know I'll be an alcoholic starting tonight. 4 days at Blue
Mesa resevoir with just da men! Wife and kids gotsta fend fur
dem-selfs.
Bought 3 cases and a bottle worth of nurishment, and some food too;-)
I just don't want high winds. Alot of suds and waves against da boat
makes for a night in the camper of feeling like your still on the
boat.
Tim
|
9.4347 | | POWDML::GARBARINO | | Wed May 15 1996 14:43 | 16 |
| > It shouldn't even be an option. I don't believe in draconian drug laws
> but manadatory should mean mandatory whether he's a Dallas Cowboy or
> not.
So he does the 1-year mandatory in jail. What reason does he have to
do any public service work ? I mean, if he's "just like everybody else",
he does his time and goes about his business when he's done. Screw
telling the kids that he made a mistake. He doesn't have to....
Too bad, 'cause some of the reports I read talked about how kids were
coming up to him and saying that they believed he was right and the
police were wrong. Seems to be public admittance that he was wrong
and that kids should learn from it would be more valuable than not
doing the same. Whether some of you guys want to accept it or not,
public figures CAN serve different *sentences* and the community
at-large will benefit.
|
9.4348 | POLICE are alllllways wrong... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed May 15 1996 15:43 | 7 |
| What this world needs to understand is that there are ramifications
for choices made. If it means that a person does time for said choice
then so be it. The problem that I *perceive* exists is that there
are very few consequences for our actions. I don't understand why
people think that the main reason for punishment is deterrence.
It seems to me that main objective of punishment is punishment. If
deterrence happens because of punishment then GREAT...
|
9.4349 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Wed May 15 1996 15:55 | 8 |
|
Tim,
A few guy's in the next group over went first of the month. No luck
on lakers, but the Brown's were hitting pretty good. I expect the
salmon may be ready to start hitting also. If you like the salmon take
some white corn along. The locals say they go crazy over white corn.
And there is usually none to be found in the Gunnison stores
|
9.4350 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 15 1996 16:12 | 39 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4348 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>
>I don't understand why
> people think that the main reason for punishment is deterrence.
> It seems to me that main objective of punishment is punishment. If
> deterrence happens because of punishment then GREAT...
There are some who feel that government should do the minimum possible and
since deterrence is needed for the public safety, they should limit themselves
to that. There are others who feel government should run our lives and balance
out the wrongs of the world, which would seem to include the doling out
punishment.
Of course the people who talk most about limiting government seem most
interested in expanding the governments role in the area of punishment where
as the people most interested in big government talk about limiting government
to deterrence so go figure.
From a practical point of view, we've gone from about 350,000 people
incarcerated in jails, prisons, and houses of correction around the nation
in 1980 to over a million today and with truth and sentencing laws now on
the book people are predicting that the number will more than double in the
next 10 years. This means that by 2010 we could have 1% of the population
locked up, another 1% watching over them and most likely as many involved
in the bureaucracy this creates.
When that happens we will have 3% of the nation involved in prisons in
some fashion either as residents or workers which means the prison industry
will involve more people in the United States than there are farmers.
And we haven't even started talking about the boom this creates for lawyers
as more judges, prosecutors, and defense lawyers fight out cases that would
have been plea-barganed were it not for the life sentence staring the
defendant in the face.
What we need is a lot less people in prison, not more. This is the wrong
candidate for the fastest growing industry in the nation.
George
|
9.4351 | if you do the crime, you do the time | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed May 15 1996 16:59 | 4 |
9.4352 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 15 1996 17:39 | 16 |
| Actually there are two ideas floating around that would work really well
together. One of the Republican candidates was pushing for a giant fence along
the boarder and a separate branch of the military to serve as boarder police
for the purpose of keeping out illegal aliens.
Why not kill two birds on one stone. Face the barbered wire at the top of
this fence in both directions, declare the entire nation a prison and we will
have the best of both worlds. No more aliens will get in and every single man,
woman, and child in the United States will be a prisoner.
Hey why not? After all we're all sinners. We could all take responsibility
for our crimes at once and think of the money we'd save if we didn't have to
build any more prisons.
A politicians dream,
George
|
9.4353 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Wed May 15 1996 19:05 | 5 |
| Take your fence and your soapbox to ::SOAPBOX where it belongs.
billl
|
9.4354 | | NQOS01::nqsrv443.nqo.dec.com::may_br | BRUCE MAY | Wed May 15 1996 19:38 | 16 |
| >Of course I drink alone. I live alone. If I want a beer or a nice glass of
I drink alone. When I drink alone I prefer to be by myself....
One of the many great lines from George T. It's right up there with "If you
don't start drinking I'm gonna leave"
RE Irvin: The guy has not seemed one bit repentent. Why the hell would you
even want him near a kid, nevermind talking to them about drugs? The guy
would have skated had he not shown up in court in furs and copping an
attitude.
Lock him up.
Bruce
|
9.4355 | Bon-voyage | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Wed May 15 1996 20:13 | 15 |
| Cadz,
I do take white corn, and use Dick Nites, Needlefish or Arnies with
it. I learned that a few years back when this guy pulled up to the
Ponderosa dock with a medium sized cooler full of Salmon and he told us
what he used, and he had only been out 2hrs.
Sapaniro basin has always been the most productive for salmon and
browns, elk creek area for salmon and 'bows, Iola basin for small
lakers.
Here's to catching that lunker this year!
Tim
|
9.4356 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 15 1996 20:23 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4353 by MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long "Beat em Bucs" >>>
> Take your fence and your soapbox to ::SOAPBOX where it belongs.
But this is a sports related suggestion that solves the problem of criminal
football players.
If the entire nation were declared a prison, and every man woman and child
were declared a prisoner then all institutions by definition would become
prison institutions. That means all NFL teams would become prison teams and all
these criminal football players would be able to play on these prison teams
with no problem.
Thing is you guys lack creativity. There's a simple solution to every
problem.
George
|
9.4357 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Wed May 15 1996 20:36 | 6 |
|
Here is another simple solution: Shoot anyone suspected of doing
drugs. Good idea huh?
Marc
|
9.4358 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed May 15 1996 20:47 | 5 |
|
But in some cases they've already shot up. If you shoot them again it would
be redundant.
George
|
9.4359 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Springtime at last | Thu May 16 1996 10:25 | 5 |
| >Here is another simple solution: Shoot anyone suspected of doing
>drugs. Good idea huh?
That's about 30% of the kids in High School and probably 20% of the
adults in this country
|
9.4360 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 16 1996 11:24 | 7 |
|
Here is another simple solution: Increase police visibility. It has
been shown that in areas where more traffic tickets are issued and
police visibility is high, violent crimes are lower.
If that doesn't work, I suggest monthly hangings at town hall of
all drug dealers - dealer meaning "seller of any amount".
|
9.4361 | Arizona will soon join them | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu May 16 1996 12:33 | 2 |
9.4362 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Thu May 16 1996 12:55 | 6 |
|
I knew this would rapidly degenerate into George Maiewski ragging
on Republicans and Mike Heiser pushing the conservative line with
both of them using half-truths and misinformation to push their
points of view. The discussion was whether or not Irvin should go
to the slammer.
|
9.4363 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove | Thu May 16 1996 13:02 | 19 |
|
>> So he does the 1-year mandatory in jail. What reason does he have to
>> do any public service work ?
Because it's part of his sentence?
>> Screw telling the kids that he made a mistake. He doesn't have to....
"He doesn't have to...." He wouldn't if he didn't have to? I agree.
He doesn't give a damn about telling kids that he made a mistake.
He probably thinks his only mistake was getting caught. At least
that's what his subsequent actions would seem to indicate. I give
kids credit for being able to see through the phony remorse of
guys like Michael Irvin who only speak out about drug abuse as
part of a sentence. "Hi, kids. I'm Michael Irvin and I'm here be-
cause I have to be." Sorry, it doesn't work for me. Send his butt
to jail and the clear message is that it doesn't matter who you
are, if you screw up your butt is going to jail. No exceptions.
|
9.4364 | | AKEEM::GRONOWSKI | | Thu May 16 1996 14:00 | 2 |
|
What's wrong with ragging on Republicans?
|
9.4365 | trolling... | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Fri May 17 1996 13:30 | 8 |
| I hope he does time if/when he's convicted.
That said, too busy to even bother with Meowski's pointless
tirade.
Have a nice day.
daryll
|
9.4366 | No more Big Sombrero | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 11 1996 12:39 | 5 |
| Wail, it turns out them new folks down in Tampa Bay are big fans of
M*A*S*H so they're gonna change the name of the stadium from The Big
Sombrero [which I liked] to Margaret Houlihan's Stadium.
No confirmation yet from Loretta Swit...
|
9.4367 | mostly legal | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jun 17 1996 13:03 | 21 |
| Some Football, mostly legal stuff:
o The wife of former Cowboy punter, Colin Ridgway is a suspect
in his murder. Ridgway was shot in 1993. The guy she supposedly
hired has confessed.
o Michael Irvin has been indicted again: misdemeanor for some
reefer and felony for some coke.
o Brian Blades was convicted of manslaughter despite the fack
that the prosecution demonstrated his side of the story,
accidental shooing. One of the jurors said she wanted to
change her vote so the defense has filed a motion.
o Ol' Larry Phillips found out over the weekend that if'n he's
convicted he'll get to do some time, at least of probation
violation. He could pull as much as a year.
TTom
|
9.4368 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | wannabe figure skater | Mon Jun 17 1996 13:48 | 6 |
|
Too bad for Lawrence Philips that his crime occurred in
California after he left the Cornhuskers. If he'd been in
school and in state when it occured he could have plowed
into a car full of nuns and they'd have been caned for
denting his Mercedes.
|
9.4369 | too funny | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Jun 18 1996 08:37 | 0 |
9.4370 | Giants to release Herschel Walker? | HBAHBA::HAAS | just kidding about that figger skating thing | Tue Jun 18 1996 14:34 | 6 |
| Supposedly the Giants are gonna release Herschel Walker.
Something about too deep at RB. And prolly his 3-year 4.8 mil contract
was ripe for the dumping.
TTom
|
9.4371 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | | Tue Jun 18 1996 14:52 | 11 |
|
Last I heard Herschel was staying on by signing for the
minimum salary. This ultimatum from GY and Co. Supposedly
Herschel took it.
Shark
|
9.4372 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Tue Jun 18 1996 16:14 | 1 |
| Grab a ballcap and a seat Hersh.
|
9.4373 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Jun 19 1996 09:39 | 1 |
| I believe I heard on the news last night that he was released.....
|
9.4374 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Wed Jun 19 1996 10:07 | 13 |
| From: http://web.usatoday.com/sports/st.htm
:
FOOTBALL
:
New York Giants -- Released running back Herschel Walker.
:
George
|
9.4375 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | | Thu Jun 20 1996 10:08 | 14 |
|
Herschel is gone! Not that It"ll matter, this team
rots from the top down. The G-men will sip maybe 4 wins,
Dan I'm bad for football will be caned then canned by the NY media.
Goerge 2 biscuits short of a metric butt ton will continue the
misery. It's gonna be a looooong season at the Meadowlands.
Shark
|
9.4376 | what's wrong with George | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:08 | 11 |
| > Goerge 2 biscuits short of a metric butt ton will continue the
> misery. It's gonna be a looooong season at the Meadowlands.
Shark,
You seen ol' George lately? He's closer to emaciated than fat.
Looks like he open heart surgery, liposection and his lower intestine
removed.
What the hail happened to him?
|
9.4377 | Regardless, cain't be good for you... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:11 | 11 |
|
> Looks like he open heart surgery, liposection and his lower intestine
> removed.
>
> What the hail happened to him?
Prob'ly got aholt of a few cases of that SlimFat stuff that reduced
Ground Chuck Knox to an unrecognizable shell of a main...
glenn
|
9.4378 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:21 | 24 |
| Actually what happened to George YOung is more or less this. His doctor told
him that he had to lose a lot of weight. Period. George starting eating
mostly salads, from what I heard, and lost almost (if not a bit more) 100
pounds.
I heard him tell that to Chris Russo on WFAN.
Actually, his glasses used to be too small to fit on his haid. Now his ears
are too big.
But regardless of George Young and his ineptitude in functioning in today's
NFL, the team is pretty poor IMO, and won't do much this year. Dan Reeves is
hoping for that because he wants out. NYG wouldn't let him go last year
because they'd have to pay him.
I was disappointed with the roster last year, and this year's roster is even
more disappointing.
But you know what -- they're all good citizens. (A Dan Reeves pre-req).
'Saw
|
9.4379 | Giants vs Celtics | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:26 | 4 |
| So Saw, just for comparisons, how do you rate the NY Football Giants with
the Boston Basketball Celtics, right now.
Who's gonna get a ring sooner?
|
9.4380 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Bos-Mil-Atl Braves W.S. Champs | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:33 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4379 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>
>So Saw, just for comparisons, how do you rate the NY Football Giants with
>the Boston Basketball Celtics, right now.
I don't think interleague play gets started until next year but somehow I
think you'll gave to wait a bit longer to see that game.
George
|
9.4381 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:34 | 32 |
| >
>So Saw, just for comparisons, how do you rate the NY Football Giants with
>the Boston Basketball Celtics, right now.
>
>Who's gonna get a ring sooner?
That's a tough call.
I don't follow basketball all that much, but I don't really have a lot of
faith in ML Carr. Comparing Carr to Young, Young was once great and the game
has passed him by. Carr is unproven.
Both teams seems to be mired in mediocrity -- not poor enough to get a really
good draft pick to help jump start the franchise, and not good enough to do
anything more than tease the fans like Mary Jane with the tight sweater used to
do to the boys in high school when she'd go out with them on Friday nights.
Focusing more closely on the Giants, I believe that they have actually
regressed this year. The line was poor last year, and this year, despite the
hype from Giants central, is poorer. The QB is NOT imo, an NFL caliber QB and
I have my doubts whether or not Dave "Duck" Brown ever will be.
The defensive front seven is porous. The secondary's best player last year was
just released.
I think it will be a long season, and despite Danny Boy being able to shine
by playing an easier schedule, I think he's gone at season's end anyway.
'Saw
|
9.4382 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:35 | 18 |
|
>> But regardless of George Young and his ineptitude in functioning in
>> today's NFL,
Nobody has it easy anymore. If you're a great team like the 'Boys
or the 49ers you not only have to fight to keep your stars but
everyone tries to raid you for your backups too. If you're a
pretty good team like the Steelers you only have one or two years
near the top before the same fate befalls you. If you're a wannabe
like the Pats or the Giants you have to hope for a couple of
great drafts which requires not only that you draft well but also
that you stink for a couple of years. You also have to play the free
agent market well. As of late, neither the Pats nor the Giants
have shown the ability to play the free agent market well.
The good news is that the league is watered down and it doesn't
take much to make a contender. Look at last year's Steelers for
evidence.
|
9.4383 | my thought on my favorites | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:39 | 5 |
|
Celtics because the NBA is more water-down than the NFL. This of course is
subject to change if the NFL expands by 3 or 4 teams.........
mike
|
9.4384 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:42 | 29 |
| > Nobody has it easy anymore. If you're a great team like the 'Boys
> or the 49ers you not only have to fight to keep your stars but
> everyone tries to raid you for your backups too. If you're a
> pretty good team like the Steelers you only have one or two years
> near the top before the same fate befalls you. If you're a wannabe
> like the Pats or the Giants you have to hope for a couple of
> great drafts which requires not only that you draft well but also
> that you stink for a couple of years. You also have to play the free
> agent market well. As of late, neither the Pats nor the Giants
> have shown the ability to play the free agent market well.
> The good news is that the league is watered down and it doesn't
> take much to make a contender. Look at last year's Steelers for
> evidence.
I agree.
Maybe it's because I'm a Giants fan and I'm so close to the situation, but
I really do feel as if George Young, at one time one of the BEST no doubt, is
now not capable of functioning in the "new" world of the NFL.
George believes in not favoring one over another, and in spreading the wealth
across the team (more or less). That doesn't work these days.
That the talent is watered down as you say IS a blessing however. Still, I
don't see the Giants contending THIS season.....
'Saw
|
9.4385 | They'll be back... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 20 1996 11:47 | 10 |
|
> The good news is that the league is watered down and it doesn't
> take much to make a contender. Look at last year's Steelers for
> evidence.
Next time the Giants or Pats play the Cowboys in the playoffs as tough
as the Steelers did, give us a ring...
glenn
|
9.4386 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jun 20 1996 12:25 | 15 |
|
>> Next time the Giants or Pats play the Cowboys in the playoffs as tough
>> as the Steelers did, give us a ring...
I'm sure playing the Giants tough in the SB is still a big
consolation for Bills fans after all of these years. That and
$.95 will get you a cup of coffee at our cafeteria. The Steelers
were a decent team but they benefited greatly from the general
mediocrity of the entire league. Still the team that "knows
how to do it" will have to do it this year without Kevin Greene
or last year's starting QB who they wouldn't pay but would pay
his backup a fat incentive filled contract though he's started
all of two (?) games in his entire career. You're right to hold
on to last year because you won't be nearly as close this year.
|
9.4387 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Thu Jun 20 1996 12:30 | 4 |
| > Next time the Giants or Pats play the Cowboys in the playoffs as tough
> as the Steelers did, give us a ring...
It'd be the Steelers first in a while... :-) :-)
|
9.4388 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Thu Jun 20 1996 12:33 | 4 |
|
I see from the 96 schedule that the Pats come to Big "D" in December. I
can imagine the BS that will be flying around in here when that game
comes around.
|
9.4389 | Was not quite the crapshoot you imply... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 20 1996 12:48 | 19 |
|
> I'm sure playing the Giants tough in the SB is still a big
> consolation for Bills fans after all of these years. That and
> $.95 will get you a cup of coffee at our cafeteria.
Don't change the parameters of the discussion. You're good at
that. The issue was "anyone can contend for the Super Bowl".
That might be true in 1996, but the 1995 Steelers are a poor
example to cite, because they did better than that. Sure, use
the 1994 Chargers. And something like that may again occur in
1996. But linking total mediocrities like the Jets, Giants,
Pats, etc. to the 1995 Steelers (or the 1990 Bills for that matter)
is shoddy analysis. The Steelers built their team up, steadily
improving over the past 4-5 years before they broke in, and as
a result were somewhat prepared for the experience. The teams
you list are looking at major turnarounds to even get that far.
glenn
|
9.4390 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jun 20 1996 13:06 | 15 |
|
>> The Steelers built their team up, steadily improving over
>> the past 4-5 years before they broke in, and as a result
>> were somewhat prepared for the experience.
The experience of what? Barely beating the Marshall Faulk-less
Indianapolis Colts? Of losing (they did *lose* you know) to the
Dallas Cowboys? The Steelers benefitted from playing in a mediocre
league and *that* was what the discussion was about. No way a
completely loaded Dallas team that's not led by Barry Switzer
does anything but beat the absolute dog snot out of a Neil O'Donnell
and the Steelers. The Steelers haven't had to suffer from success
but this year they will and it will be someone else from the
AFC who gets to benefit from the current state of the NFL.
|
9.4391 | All depends on your definitions of "doesn't take much", etc. | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 20 1996 13:07 | 24 |
|
> The good news is that the league is watered down and it doesn't
> take much to make a contender. Look at last year's Steelers for
> evidence.
What Vegas thinks of thised year (to win it all):
NFL Super Bowl XXXI (updated May 6)
49ers 3-1
Cowboys 4-1
Packers 8-1
Dolphins 10-1
Steelers 10-1
Patriots 30-1
Giants 50-1
Jets 75-1
glenn
|
9.4392 | There's still a gap... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 20 1996 13:14 | 23 |
|
>> The Steelers built their team up, steadily improving over
>> the past 4-5 years before they broke in, and as a result
>> were somewhat prepared for the experience.
>
> The experience of what? Barely beating the Marshall Faulk-less
> Indianapolis Colts? Of losing (they did *lose* you know) to the
> Dallas Cowboys?
Somewhat (I did say somewhat you know ;-) prepared for the experience
of showing up for a Super Bowl with the intention of giving the viewing
public more than approximately 3.5 game minutes of suspense over the
final outcome.
The Jets, Pats, or Giants will not be duplicating this feat anytime
soon, was my point. Someone else, maybe, but these three teams are
a few, to several, years away. Free agency has brought on mediocrity
(or even more mediocrity) but there _is_ still a rebuilding process,
and you vastly underrate the existence and importance of this process
(supported by Vegas' assessment of the "contenders").
glenn
|
9.4393 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jun 20 1996 13:22 | 6 |
| And the player who brought them that close, Neil O'Donnell, is gone
with the usual nfl rag-tag there replacing him. However, to dream that
Switzer is the reason that it was close and it would have been a walk
otherwise is wrong. The coach to criticize is the overrated Cowher who
put the entire load on O'Donnell's shoulders and then allowed the blame
to fall on those same heroic limbs.
|
9.4394 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jun 20 1996 13:27 | 22 |
|
>> Somewhat (I did say somewhat you know ;-) prepared for the experience
>> of showing up for a Super Bowl with the intention of giving the viewing
>> public more than approximately 3.5 game minutes of suspense over the
>> final outcome.
Thank Barry Switzer for that. The 'Boys come out and blow Gregg
LLoyd completely off the ball three straight plays and Switzer
goes immediately away from it.
>> (supported by Vegas' assessment of the "contenders").
Which seems to be that it's a three way horse race between three
NFC teams and the Dolphins and Steelers benefit from not having to
play any of them in the playoffs otherwise they'd each be much
longer odds. The Lions, btw, are at 12-1 but if they were in the
AFC they'd be shorter odds. These days half the battle is getting
there and if you play in the AFC it's a much easier battle and has
been for a while. I said the Steelers are a pretty good team and they
are. But not much more than that.
|
9.4395 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jun 20 1996 13:39 | 5 |
| I'm surprised that the oddsmakers figure the Giants have a better chance to win
the Super Bowl than the Jets.
Last time I looked, on paper, the Jets have a better team. Course, the Jets
never seem to play "on paper."
|
9.4396 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Jun 20 1996 13:42 | 5 |
9.4397 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jun 20 1996 13:52 | 14 |
| >
> Hey 'Saw (or any Giants fan), I met a guy Sunday night named Tim Watson
> that said he played safety for the Giants last year. Is he any good?
>
> thanks,
> Mike
Never heard of him.
He might have been on the practice squad or whatever they call it...
He's probably better than I am at playing safety....8^)
|
9.4398 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Thu Jun 20 1996 14:06 | 1 |
9.4399 | Pittsburgh will contend again this year | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Fri Jun 21 1996 03:19 | 24 |
| To all of the "Pittsburgh Steeler doubters"......
DEFENSE wins Super Bowls and Pittsburgh has (and has had for the past
3 or 4 years) one of the top 3 defenses in the NFL. Add to that a
mediocre (at best) offense, like last year, and you have a Super Bowl
contender. Even when Pittsburgh won their 4 Super Bowls in the 70's
the offense didn't show up until the 3rd trip (they scored 16, 21, 35
and then 31). Pittsburgh dominated an offense that was supposed to
have blown them out by the end of the first half. Yes, they blew
Greg Lloyd and the rest of the defense off the line on the first series
of downs, and then got stuffed for the rest of the game. If not for
two "gift-wrapped" interceptions, Dallas might have been the team that
was "blown out". It was Pittsburgh's offensive line that was man-
handling the Dallas defense in the 4th quarter, not the other way
around. It's amazing how fans of mediocre teams try to drag good teams
down to the level of their pathetic teams (in their own little dream
world), in order to make themselves feel better.
I wish all fans and their teams good luck this season. Only two teams
can get to the Super Bowl, and I'm betting on my Steelers to get there
again, and win it this time.
D. J.
|
9.4400 | don't get it | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jun 21 1996 10:31 | 8 |
| > DEFENSE wins Super Bowls and Pittsburgh has (and has had for the past
> 3 or 4 years) one of the top 3 defenses in the NFL.
Untrue on the face of it. You say DEFENSE wins Super Bowls and assert
that the Burgh's defense is top rated. Yet we know they din't win the
Super Bowl in any of them years.
TTom
|
9.4401 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Fri Jun 21 1996 10:54 | 20 |
|
>> I wish all fans and their teams good luck this season. Only two teams
>> can get to the Super Bowl, and I'm betting on my Steelers to get there
>> again, and win it this time.
There's as much a chance of the Steelers winning the Super Bowl this
year as there is of Michael Jackson, Jr. being born this year. You
lost your QB and you lost Kevin Greene. You had your one shot against
'Brainless' Barry Switzer and you choked it away. And if you want to
cry about gift interceptions, if Coryatt doesn't drop one the Steelers
watch the SB on tv. You've got a decent defense and a decent offensive
line but your skill position players are decidedly unskilled and Cowher
couldn't win a battle of wits against Darryll and his other brother
Darryll. The AFC Central still figures to be the weakest division in
football so you'll probably get to the playoffs again but the road to
the AFC title goes through Miami these days and the combo of Johnson
and Marino figures to be just a tad tougher then the Faulk-less Colts
that you struggled against last year. The Steelers will be right around
.500 and then get bounced out of the playoffs early.
|
9.4402 | 10-1 is about right, and ain't bad... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Fri Jun 21 1996 11:09 | 24 |
|
> There's as much a chance of the Steelers winning the Super Bowl this
> year as there is of Michael Jackson, Jr. being born this year.
Record it...
> The Steelers will be right around
> .500 and then get bounced out of the playoffs early.
Record it. We heard exactly the same prediction last year, and the
year before.
BTW, the loss of Kevin Greene rates as about a Priority 10 event in
the entire scheme of league free agent movement, and I suspect you know
that Tommy. He'll be missed little, if at all. Not nearly as much as
Rod Woodson was last year.
Exactly how did 'Brainless' Barry attempt to give away last year's
Super Bowl? I must have missed that. (And at what point did
Marshall Faulk gain your undying respect?) There's an excuse for
everything, and most of these are secondary or inconsequential.
glenn
|
9.4403 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Fri Jun 21 1996 11:51 | 5 |
|
That mediocre team you speak of has won three of the last four SB's
and beat the your Steelers doing it. The Almost Football Conference aka
AFC still has a ways to go before they will win another SB. The 9er's
Packers and Cowboys are still the best teams in the league.
|
9.4404 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:04 | 16 |
|
>> Exactly how did 'Brainless' Barry attempt to give away last year's
>> Super Bowl?
The 'Boys come out and blow the Steelers and particularly Gregg
LLoyd right off the ball on three straight plays. That, of course,
was Barry's cue to go to the finesse game.
>> (And at what point did Marshall Faulk gain your undying respect?)
He hasn't. He's the Colts best offensive player. By far. Take any-
body's best offensive player out of the game and it'll make a dif-
ference. That's not an excuse that's a fact.
|
9.4405 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:07 | 11 |
|
> That mediocre team you speak of has won three of the last four SB's
> and beat the your Steelers doing it.
Who is "you"? Ain't no one called the Cowboys mediocre, and in
fact I've used the fact that they are (or at least were) most
decidedly not mediocre to support the contention that the Steelers
are (were) a pretty solid football team...
glenn
|
9.4406 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:11 | 20 |
|
> The 'Boys come out and blow the Steelers and particularly Gregg
> LLoyd right off the ball on three straight plays. That, of course,
> was Barry's cue to go to the finesse game.
Bottom line is that the Steelers _stopped_ (not just slowed down)
Emmitt Smith. You don't hear of that too often, and it has been
conveniently ignored here. And, at the very least, they played
the 'boys even up on both sides of the line of scrimmage. Again,
not something under Barry's gameday control.
> He hasn't. He's the Colts best offensive player. By far. Take any-
> body's best offensive player out of the game and it'll make a dif-
> ference. That's not an excuse that's a fact.
I'll take Harbaugh, practically the AFC MVP, and immense in the
playoffs...
glenn
|
9.4407 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Fri Jun 21 1996 12:15 | 3 |
| re -1
My mistake I misread .4399's line about a mediocre offense.
|
9.4408 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Fri Jun 21 1996 13:31 | 16 |
|
>> Bottom line is that the Steelers _stopped_ (not just slowed down)
>> Emmitt Smith.
The same way the '9ers stopped Alvin Harper the year before.
If Barry was being attacked by a bike gang and he had a loaded
shot gun, he'd start swinging it.
>> I'll take Harbaugh, practically the AFC MVP, and immense in the
>> playoffs...
Harbaugh did have a nice steady season but his picture doesn't
conjure up the word "explosive" any more than Marge Schott's picture
conjures up the words "sex kitten".
|
9.4409 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri Jun 21 1996 13:51 | 5 |
| > The same way the '9ers stopped Alvin Harper the year before.
> If Barry was being attacked by a bike gang and he had a loaded
> shot gun, he'd start swinging it.
This made me laugh more than the Marge comment... :-)
|
9.4410 | When in doubt, blam it all on Switzer | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Fri Jun 21 1996 14:39 | 14 |
|
>> The same way the '9ers stopped Alvin Harper the year before.
>> If Barry was being attacked by a bike gang and he had a loaded
>> shot gun, he'd start swinging it.
>
> This made me laugh more than the Marge comment... :-)
Funny, but if someone posts Emmitt's stats from the game (particularly
those after that first drive), we'd see the fallacy of the statement.
But of course there's bound to be some excuse, that Barry's shotgun
swinging broke Emmitt's rhythm, etc., etc.
glenn
|
9.4411 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:18 | 8 |
|
>> but if someone posts Emmitt's stats from the game (particularly
>> those after that first drive),
When Barry went immediately away from what was working just as I
said. Thanks for reinforcing my point.
|
9.4412 | "What was working" == one play | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Fri Jun 21 1996 15:48 | 18 |
| >> but if someone posts Emmitt's stats from the game (particularly
>> those after that first drive),
>
> When Barry went immediately away from what was working just as I
> said. Thanks for reinforcing my point.
So Barry quickly went away from "running plays which work for Emmitt"
to "running plays which don't work for Emmitt". All after two complete
seasons coaching Emmitt and the 'boys running game and seeing no one
stop it. Very convenient...
Emmitt's numbers, btw, were 18 carries for 49 yards, including one
carry of 23 yards in which Emmitt was The Man, and another 17 carries
for 26 yards on which Barry was calling the wrong plays. Barry's a
moron.
glenn
|
9.4413 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:12 | 1 |
9.4414 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:19 | 4 |
|
>> I'm surprised we haven't seen the "Emmitt was injured" line yet.
I was saving it.
|
9.4415 | ;-) | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jun 21 1996 17:22 | 1 |
9.4416 | Agree | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Sun Jun 23 1996 12:12 | 22 |
| re: .4389
I agree 100%
Yeah, the Steelers lost, but they outplayed the Cowboys at
both sides of the line and almost completely shut down Smith
in the 2nd half.
They also played the other NFC champion, Packers, to a real
close finish in GB on the last regular season game.
Yes, they drop big at QB (unless Stewart can surprise and I
think he's eventually going to) and will probably lose Morris,
but still for a team to beat the Cowboys in the trenches like
they did, its ridiculous to rate them as typifying league
mediocrity.
I usually like Brydie's comments, but I feel his assessment of
the Steelers to be inaccurate.
Tony
|
9.4417 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Mon Jun 24 1996 07:45 | 7 |
|
If Tony's note upset you Tom, let me know. I know where he lives I can fix
things up so the speak.......
;^)
mike
|
9.4418 | More Support for Steelers | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jun 24 1996 09:25 | 35 |
| re: -1
Its over Mike...Tommy never forgave me for my valiant defense of
Wisconsin after they 'routed' UCLA in the '94 Rose Bowl!!!!
And another thing...I think we overhype the reality that good teams
have close games against teams that may be considered not as good.
Anyone can logically show that William and Mary is better than Notre
Dame on the basis that they beat team 'a', team 'a' beat team 'b',
team 'b' beat team 'c' and team 'c' beat Notre Dame.
What a CROCK!!! FORGET THE COLTS!!
Look at UCLA Missouri. Tyus Edney doesn't make that court long shot
and UCLA are severe underachievers. We see this sort of thing all
the time and yes I appreciate that college age athletes ought be more
unpredictable.
The Steelers had a fine team. They had the Pack on the ropes in GB
and their receiver Thigpen dropped a sure winning TD in the endzone
(although they shouldn't have had the 1st down anyway cause O'Donnel's
4th down sneak was a bogus placemant, but I digress).
Green Bay needed that game for the division title and it was in GB
and the Steelers were playing for pride.
So the NFC championship game featured two teams that the Steelers
took to the ropes.
Knocking the '95 Steelers is a complete crock, imo. They do not
correlate to a league of mediocrity though I agree this well
describes the league.
Tony
|
9.4419 | Go Claymores!~ Watta WLAF team!~ | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jun 24 1996 14:53 | 11 |
| I know this aint NFl but the Scottish Claymores, led by Yo Murphy (caint
make this kinda thing up), beat the Frankfurt Galaxy in the WLAF World
Bowl.
Of course, it turns out that this was a lock, cause on this day in 1314,
the forces of Scotland's King Robert the First defeated the English in
the Battle of Bannockburn.
I just wished I'd known afore I went with Frankfurt. ;+}
TTom
|
9.4420 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:00 | 40 |
| >
>I know this aint NFl but the Scottish Claymores, led by Yo Murphy (caint
>make this kinda thing up), beat the Frankfurt Galaxy in the WLAF World
>Bowl.
>
>Of course, it turns out that this was a lock, cause on this day in 1314,
>the forces of Scotland's King Robert the First defeated the English in
>the Battle of Bannockburn.
>
>I just wished I'd known afore I went with Frankfurt. ;+}
>
>TTom
I always called it the "Laugh" League adn was NOT disappointed yesterday.
Frankfurt had a couple of "iffy" calls go agin them in the last couple of
minutes.
The first was an "illegal" defense call. For a millisecond I thought I was
watching basketball, but then realized I was watching the Laugh League when
Ernie Stautner, the coach of the Galaxy, called the refs over, asked repeatedly
what the call was, and then when the ref said "I don't know, it was called
from the press box" I almost peed myself.
Nexted to the last play of the game, the Galaxy were 4th and something.
Pelleur was under center, missed the snap, and the RB picked it up and ran with
it for a first down. It was called back and downed -- seems the refs called it
a fumble and invoked the Raider Rule about advancing fumbles.
The color guy seemed to disagree that it was indeed a fumble, but I don't know
what else you'd rule a blown snap....
There were some babes in the stands also....
'Saw
|
9.4421 | a laugh and a joke | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jun 24 1996 15:03 | 9 |
| That ruling about the fumble was a joke. How can you fumble something
that you never had possession of. To say the snap was equivalent to a
fumble is ludicrous.
>There were some babes in the stands also....
And those guys in skirts kilt me...
TTom
|
9.4422 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Jun 24 1996 17:42 | 10 |
|
>>There were some babes in the stands also....
>
> And those guys in skirts kilt me...
Well, there you go, it's worthy SPROT indeed...
glenn
|
9.4423 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jun 25 1996 09:21 | 1 |
| If iss no' Scot'ish it's crap!
|
9.4424 | get the picture | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Tue Jun 25 1996 10:43 | 11 |
| Nae Frank, Nae as in
If there's nae wind it's nae golf
" " nae beanballs it's nae baseball
" " nae whining it's nae nba basketball
" " nae fighting it's nae nhl hockey
" " nae gambling it's nae nfl football
|
9.4425 | if there's nae wind it's nae budweiser | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jun 25 1996 11:03 | 0 |
9.4426 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jun 25 1996 11:55 | 13 |
| Yes, I'm fully aware of that.
However, the line I was posting was a sorta famous Mike Meyers line from SNL,
and he definitely did nae use nae...
About the best line he ever used (with the best Scottish accent too, laddie)
was
Woon moor drink and I'll be choonderin' lak a snooo-blower.
8^)
|
9.4427 | just catchin' up | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Tue Jun 25 1996 18:47 | 23 |
| I really need to access this file more when I'm on vaca.
The damn near 1000 unread notes is taking WAY too much
time to wade though.
Stepping gingerly around the feces that Tommy has left a
trail of in here is quite a feat. My how time changes
one's memory! If'n you promise to appoligize for your
unkind words about a real class NFL coach, Bill Cowher,
I could be persuaded to provide you with a copy of a
tape of SBXXX.
Me thinks that after reviewing the tape, making sure to
FF past the commercials and the halftime show, you will
be singing a different tune in regards to the 1995-96
Steelers.
I am of the opinion that Neil O'D, along with his foolish
SBXXX interceptions, will be missed in the 1996-97 Steelers
as much as Barry "I could star in any backfield" Foster was
missed last season.
billl
|
9.4428 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 26 1996 12:46 | 3 |
| So you scapegoat O'Donnell and leave Cowher, who blew the SuperBowl
unscathed. You Steeler fans amaze me, you think Lambert and Ham are
still playing.
|
9.4429 | ;^) | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Wed Jun 26 1996 13:22 | 5 |
| Being someone who thinks Grogan > Bradshaw your further
opinions on the NFL are pretty much placed in perspective.
billl
|
9.4430 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 26 1996 14:46 | 7 |
| 70s Steelers with Grogan instead of Bradshaw, now there would have been
a scary team, none of those close games, all 50-10 routs like Grogan
used to serve up.
I may be playing golf with Kevin Mannix in a few weeks I'm going to try
for an opinion on this. I can't remember if Mannix was a Grogan fan or
not.
|
9.4431 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Wed Jun 26 1996 15:02 | 3 |
| Bill,
Are you going to start that Grogan > Bradshaw BS again?
|
9.4432 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Jun 26 1996 15:09 | 3 |
9.4433 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 26 1996 15:24 | 13 |
| "I didn't start it" from Sprots Handbook, ed. G.Maiewski
"I didn't say that" Ibid
"You're out of contect" Ibid
I just said Rauf was the most talented guard offensively I'd ever seen
next to Jordan. Salary dumping isn't something I have to explain to
Mike Heiser and neither is getting a guy out of Denver for a more
liberal climate.
On Rauf I'll acknowledge that he didn't get it done last year although
he was injured and there were many factors.
|
9.4434 | teams keep guys like that no matter what the cap is | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Jun 26 1996 15:30 | 4 |
9.4435 | Gutsy, heroic... stupid... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Jun 26 1996 16:02 | 30 |
|
> So you scapegoat O'Donnell and leave Cowher, who blew the SuperBowl
> unscathed. You Steeler fans amaze me, you think Lambert and Ham
> are still playing.
Cowher did not "blow" the Super Bowl, unless we are to believe that
the Steelers' inspired second-half effort (including the brilliant
onside kick call against the sleepy Dallas special team), a
combination of tough defense, strong running game, and yes, a
temporary stretch of good passing by Neil O'Donnell, was entirely
coordinated without Cowher's knowledge.
O'Donnell's piss-poor reads on the fatal plays speak for themselves
(see 32.2155 for a refresher). As is well established, the turnover
differential is one of if not the most important stats in football,
and O'Donnell assumes a major responsibility in this department.
Cowher assumes some responsibility for calling the plays in the first
place, but distinguishing between uniform jerseys remains the job of
the onfield QB.
I think we're onto something here... Steve Grogan was also most famous
(and you can run this one by Kevin Mannix billte) for his dunderheaded
tosses into coverage at crunch time. Hence, the career stat of more
INTs than TDs, in an offensive era. Hence, the "great" individual
efforts more often than not ending up in frustrating losses
nonetheless.
glenn
|
9.4436 | Cowher gutless not O'Donnell | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:08 | 7 |
| I thought I heard earlier how well Pittsburgh handled the Dallas
defensive line. Would Cowher allow his line to maintain that
domination by running the ball? No, he didn't have the guts. So
instead he forced O'Donnell to put it in the air continuously and then
when the inevitable interception occurred left all the blame on
O'Donnell's shoulders and the Smerlas' and Breens and Granvilles only
to defend him.
|
9.4437 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Loose with rhythmic syncopations | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:24 | 4 |
|
I thought you guys knew that JJ had paidoff both Cowher and O'Donnell
the night after they had beaten the Colts. Cowher was just making sure
that O'D could keep his end of the bargin.
|
9.4438 | Run the ball? "The Drive" never even got started... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:29 | 23 |
|
> I thought I heard earlier how well Pittsburgh handled the Dallas
> defensive line. Would Cowher allow his line to maintain that
> domination by running the ball?
More accurately, a balanced offense behind an O-line that was
handling Dallas' D can work, and was working...
> So instead he forced O'Donnell to put it in the air continuously
Practically at gunpoint, even. No, O'Donnell was not putting it
up continuously; Bam Morris had good rushing yardage in the second
half. The final INT was only the second play of the possession
(and yes, the second pass-- but that's a lame excuse for what
happened from any QB worth his salt, on that type of play, but
Groganesque nonetheless).
Some of us are still trying to figure out why Larry Brown's assignment
had him covering that unmanned grassy knoll, and why O'Donnell felt
compelled to lob it in there anyway...
glenn
|
9.4439 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Jun 26 1996 17:36 | 16 |
| > More accurately, a balanced offense behind an O-line that was
> handling Dallas' D can work, and was working...
So why did he stop? He did stop. I know why, it takes a lot of guts
to go with the run because that would be Cowher's decision alone. To
pass on first down putting the pressure on the qb leads to that gray
area.
"Forced". Yeh, like as in O'Donnell runs what he's told to do.
In the famous eastern division clinching game in December of '86 when
Grogan came off the bench to beat Miami at Miami Steve used a mix of
pass and run even though behind. There I wouldn't doubt that Grogan
did probably have some input to the play-calling having the ability to
do it.
|
9.4440 | Well... | CSC32::J_HENSON | Don't get even, get ahead! | Wed Jun 26 1996 18:21 | 8 |
| >> <<< Note 9.4437 by OLD1S::CADZILLA2 "Loose with rhythmic syncopations" >>>
>>
>>
>> I thought you guys knew that JJ had paidoff both Cowher and O'Donnell
>> the night after they had beaten the Colts. Cowher was just making sure
>> that O'D could keep his end of the bargin.
Did it count against the salary cap?
|
9.4441 | Since when is it gutless to go for the "W"? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 27 1996 09:51 | 19 |
|
> So why did he stop? He did stop. I know why, it takes a lot of guts
> to go with the run because that would be Cowher's decision alone. To
> pass on first down putting the pressure on the qb leads to that gray
> area.
Cowher went to the pass for all of two plays, and he's somehow
"gutless". The first play was a wide open pass that would have
went for 20 yards to midfield but the receiver dropped the ball.
Poor play calling? So it's 2nd-and-10, late in the game, and
Cowher does the shocking thing and passes (where if O'D has any
biggame QB presence, the play produces a TD). I understand that
maybe the Bill Parcells thing to do is to slam the ball into the
line a couple times on 2nd-and-10 and punt, so that you can get
the ball back for last possession with 0:45 left, but I can't
call the alternative "gutless".
glenn
|
9.4442 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Jun 27 1996 12:25 | 6 |
| > the Smerlas' and Breens and Granvilles only to defend him.
Now that's some questionable company you hang with there billte.
billl
|
9.4443 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jun 27 1996 12:30 | 3 |
|
If Jimmy Johnson was on that Dallas sideline the game would
have been over after the first quarter.
|
9.4444 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jun 27 1996 16:06 | 7 |
| Glenn,
"Gutless" is your terminology. First down run for four keeps the
Dallas defense honest and they can't pull the stunts that mixed up the
receivers.
I will admit that a Steve Grogan or possibly even a Bradshaw would
have reacted correctly and thrown the homerun.
|
9.4445 | Two months until the much-awaited O'D-bashing season begins | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Thu Jun 27 1996 16:13 | 18 |
|
> "Gutless" is your terminology. First down run for four keeps the
> Dallas defense honest and they can't pull the stunts that mixed up the
> receivers.
For O'D, yes. I think O'Donnell, while this great percentage passer
in the regular season, gets glassy-eyed and weak-kneed in the big
game. I've seen it too many times, like with that ball he threw
in the AFC Championship Game right into Coryatt's stomach. The
great, or even very good ones, don't do that. O'Donnell lacks that
certain intestinal fortitude that even Grogan possessed in much
greater quantity.
Like Billll, I think that the Steelers will miss O'D in the regular
season, especially at first, but over the long haul, not much at all.
glenn
|
9.4446 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Jun 27 1996 17:32 | 9 |
| I agree, O'Donnell's no Grogan.
I am just not completely convinced that these passes are entirely his
fault or team/coaching mess ups. Watching O'Donnell during the second
half I thought he was completely intense and into it. From some of the
dropped balls I couldn't say that for his receivers. In fact O'Donnell
made several pin point passes into heavy traffic.
Perhaps now that he's a Jet someone will get his side of the story.
|
9.4447 | Miami says bye-bye to Green | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Jul 10 1996 14:43 | 9 |
| Miami has terminated the contract of TE Eric Green.
Several issues were at dispute but mainly the Dolphins claimed he was fat
and outta shape and Green and his agent claim he's still recovering from
injuries.
Look for this one to at least go to arbitration if not the courts.
TTom
|
9.4448 | Committment to Mediocrity | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Wed Jul 10 1996 15:04 | 20 |
| In their commitment to Total Mediocrity, the Falcons have signed June
Jones up for another three year stint.
What does this mean?
Three more years of -
Chuck and Duck ('nuff said)
Making the playoffs as a wild card is the pinnacle of the franchises
season.
An exciting horizontal passing game.
Tight End? Only on the cheerleaders!
Looking north up I-85 and seeing a franchise that does have a clue.
Losing close games due to the lack of a clock eating offensive scheme.
Any room left on the Painters bandwagon, TTom?
UMDan
|
9.4449 | come on up | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Jul 10 1996 15:06 | 9 |
| > Any room left on the Painters bandwagon, TTom?
Come on up, UMDan. The morer the merrier.
What's Jeff George's status? Has he re-signed, etc.?
And I heard that Andre Rison is available...
TTom
|
9.4450 | Make room on the wagon! | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Atlanta, Home of the WS Champs | Wed Jul 10 1996 15:37 | 13 |
| Still no movement on the George front. The paper says that after
Monday "franchise" and "transition" players can only negotiate with
their current team if they have not signed elsewhere (redundancy meter
alert?). They may sign him for the amount required by the
"designation" (don't remember if it is "franchise" or "transition") and
see what happens. Without him the chuck and duck doesn't hold up.
Rison was cut loose, but his $5M signing bonus still counts against the
Ravens cap for this year and (I think) next's. With his talent
he'll be with someone before too long.
UMDan
|
9.4451 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Wed Jul 10 1996 15:49 | 16 |
|
> Miami has terminated the contract of TE Eric Green.
>
> Several issues were at dispute but mainly the Dolphins claimed he was fat
> and outta shape and Green and his agent claim he's still recovering from
> injuries.
Another player that the Stillers just "can't do without" bites the
dust, forthwith. Good thing that the Stillers have proved without
a doubt that they don't know what they're doing in the free agent
era (have lost all but one of 20+ eligible FAs since the system was
originated-- all but Carnell Lake-- which may be the key to longterm
viability).
glenn
|
9.4452 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Wed Jul 10 1996 16:25 | 18 |
|
>> Good thing that the Stillers have proved without a doubt that
>> they don't know what they're doing in the free agent era
I don't know about 'without a doubt' (and yes, I can spot
sarcasm when I see it). Eric was a headache that any smart
coach would be happy to see go. I think Bettis will help
the Steelers be the kind of smashmouth team that can be
a contender even without an experienced QB. The real test
of how good the Steelers front office is will come when other
teams come raiding in earnest. When your offensive line and
your defense have as much talent as the Steelers do, you can't
pay everybody what somebody else will and depth suffers. Ask
the guys who beat the Steelers for it all last year, the Cowboys,
who went from completely loaded and head s and shoulders above
everybody else to having to actually scrap for the title. The
Steelers front office hasn't even gotten to the hard part yet.
|
9.4453 | extra salsa not allowed | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Wed Jul 10 1996 17:33 | 6 |
| Nice spin there, Tommy. Me thinks you should
be dining on some "crow nachos".
billl
|
9.4454 | training camps preview | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jul 11 1996 10:57 | 736 |
| [www.usatoday.com]
_________________________________________________________________
1996 TRAINING CAMP PREVIEW
AFC
BALTIMORE
Camp: Western Maryland College, Westminster, July 15.
1995 finish: 5-11, 4th in Central.
New faces: For Baltimore fans, they're almost all new. But coach Ted
Marchibroda, who once coached Baltimore Colts, is familiar. He's back
after being forced out of Indianapolis. First Ravens draft pick,
UCLA's Jonathan Ogden, will start at LG. Second No. 1 pick, MLB Ray
Lewis, also figures to start. WR Floyd Turner comes from Indy to fill
sudden need.
Departed: WR Andre Rison ($17 million, $5 M bonus) cut in salary cap
move along with aging MLB Pepper Johnson. WR Keenan McCardell, S Dana
Hall, S Louis Riddick and FB Tommy Vardell moved as free agents.
Outlook: Then-Browns fell apart last year, but many parts from 11-5
squad in '94 return. However, much hinges on play of QB Vinny
Testaverde.
_________________________________________________________________
BUFFALO
Camp: Fredonia (N.Y.) State University, July 18.
1995 finish: 10-6, 1st in East, lost AFC divisional playoff.
New faces: Ex-Detroit LB Chris Spielman signed for run-stuffing role.
Ex-Saint WR Quinn Early and No. 1 pick Eric Moulds add speed to
21st-ranked passing game. No. 2 DE Gabe Northern can learn pass-rush
tricks from Bruce Smith.
Departed: Longtime cog, LB Cornelius Bennett, fled to Atlanta. WR Bill
Brooks, who filled in superbly for injured Andre Reed in '95, signed
with Washington.
Outlook: Should make run for division crown, with nucleus players in
Smith, QB Jim Kelly, RB Thurman Thomas and LB Bryce Paup. Much depends
on Kelly, who fought through shoulder, knee and assorted other bruises
last season. Getting SS Henry Jones back to Pro Bowl form after knee
surgery is key for secondary stung by injuries.
_________________________________________________________________
CINCINNATI
Camp: Wilmington (Ohio) College, July 15, 19.
1995 finish: 7-9, 2nd in Central.
New faces: No. 1 pick, OT Willie Anderson. Secondary overhauled with
three new starters via free agency: CBs Ashley Ambrose from
Indianapolis and Jimmy Spencer from New Orleans and ex-San Diego SS Bo
Orlando. Despite established TE in Tony McGee, No. 2 pick Marco
Battaglia will get work in 2-TE sets.
Departed: FS Darryl Williams took free agency flight to Seattle.
Outlook: With QB Jeff Blake leading AFC with 28 TD passes in '95,
Bengals hope to supplement passing prowess with running of last year's
No. 1 overall pick, RB Ki-Jana Carter, whose rookie season was wiped
out with preseason knee surgery. Defense ranked dead-last in NFL in
'95, needs dominant pass-rusher.
_________________________________________________________________
DENVER
Camp: Northern Colorado University, Greeley, July 19.
1995 finish: 8-8, 4th in West.
New faces: Ex-49ers pass-rushing DE Alfred Williams. LB John Mobley,
the No. 1 pick. Ex-Eagles LB Bill Romanowski can help stuff run, and
ex-49ers CB Toi Cook adds secondary depth. Ex-Giants WR Mike Sherrard
shoulp help.
Departed: RB-KR Glyn Milburn was traded to Detroit, DE Shane Dronett
left for Atlanta and WR Mike Pritchard got released.
Outlook: Broncos need defense to keep out of shootout games. The unit
allowed at least 27 points in five games in '95, while the offense led
AFC. Elway, 36, still formidable. RB Terrell Davis, Denver's first
1,000-yard rusher in five years, is key for balance.
_________________________________________________________________
HOUSTON
Camp: Trinity University, San Antonio, July 19.
1995 finish: 7-9, 3rd in Central.
New faces: Backfield added power-RB Eddie George with No. 1 pick and
San Diego's former ace receiving-RB, Ronnie Harmon. Ex-Chiefs WR
Willie Davis brings speed. Ex-Seattle S Rafael Robinson adds depth. FB
Frank Wycheck.
Departed: DT Glenn Montgomery dealt to Seattle in draft-day
manuevering, and defense also lost standout LB Eddie Robinson. FB Todd
McNair had 60 catches in '95 but didn't fit into plans.
Outlook: With move to Nashville imminent for 1998, not much expected
in support department. But lame-duck franchise could still intrigue
locals with second-year QB Steve McNair prepping to unseat veteran
Chris Chandler. Rebuilding continues on DL, where No. 2 DT Bryant Mix
could start as rookie. Solid defense much better with MLB Al Smith and
FS Marcus Roberston return from injuries.
_________________________________________________________________
INDIANAPOLIS
Camp: Anderson (Ind.) University, rookies reported July 5; vets, July
15.
1995 finish: 9-7, 2nd in East, lost AFC championship game.
New faces: Free agent arrivals in OT Troy Auzenne and Gs Jay
Leeuwenburg and Doug Widell. G Tony Mandarich tries to revive career
after three-year layoff. No. 1 pick Marvin Harrison is polished WR.
Departed: Marchibroda forced out. Defensive coordinator Vince Tobin
got chance to be head coach in Arizona. OT Will Wolford left as free
agent, and C Kirk Lowdermilk mulls retirement. CB Ashley Ambrose left
for Cincinnati.
Outlook: Colts, with new coach Lindy Infante and defensive boss Jim
Johnson, aim to prove that last year's emergence in playoffs wasn't
fluke. Faulk has recovered from knee problem, but Colts still want to
expand passing game.
_________________________________________________________________
JACKSONVILLE
Camp site: Jacksonville (Fla.) Municipal Stadium, July 18.
1995 finish: 4-12, 5th in Central.
New faces: OT Leon Searcy and No. 2 pick, C Michael Cheever, were
added to promising young line. FB Natrone Means, claimed after cut by
San Diego. Keenan McCardell is another WR target. Jags nabbed Kevin
Hardy, top LB in draft, ex-Houston playmaking LB Eddie Robinson and
solid ex-Green Bay NT John Jurkovic. No. 2 DE Tony Brackens could have
impact.
Departed: QB Steve Beuerlein, S Darren Carrington and G Eugene Chung.
Outlook: Jaguars fared better than most expansion teams in first year.
But like most teams starting from scratch, personnel shuffling
resumes. Getting 28th-ranked offense to develop some consistency
relies on big year from Means.
_________________________________________________________________
KANSAS CITY
Camp: University of Wisconsin-River Falls, July 25.
1995 finish: 13-3, 1st in West, lost in divisional playoff.
New faces: Chiefs drafted DBs Jerome Woods and Reggie Tongue with
first two picks. Fast WR Joe Horn enters as ex-CFL standout, and
Philadelphia-ex Reggie Johnson added to bolster TE spot.
Departed: WR Willie Davis and DE Darren Mickel fled as free agents. K
Lin Elliott, who missed three FGs in playoff loss.
Outlook: Mission is to regroup after upset loss in playoffs.
Exceptional run defense remains intact, with S Mark Collins' decision
not to retire an added bonus. But QB Steve Bono is man on hot seat
after miserable '95 finish. With several nucleus players (RB Marcus
Allen, DE Neil Smith and OT John Alt) in 30s, Chiefs' window for Super
Bowl berth is diminishing.
_________________________________________________________________
MIAMI
Camp site: Nova University, Davie, Fla., July 15, 18.
1995 finish: 9-7, 3rd in East, lost wild-card playoff.
New faces: After two-year hiatus, Jimmy Johnson is back.
Ex-Philadelphia WR Fred Barnett was biggest free-agent signee. Drafted
DE Daryl Gardener in first round and RB Karim Abdul-Jabbar in third.
Other pickups: ex-Minnesota LB Jack Del Rio, ex-Philadelphia DE Daniel
Stubbs, ex-Packer WR-KR Charles Jordan.
Departed: Coach Don Shula. Key defensive starters MLB Bryan Cox, CB
Troy Vincent and DE Marco Coleman took free-agency route, as did WR
Irving Fryar. Defensive coordinator Tom Olivadotti fired. TE Eric
Green cut.
Outlook: It's left to Johnson and his motivational skills to bring out
best in Dolphins. But rebuilding defense and solidifying running game
are other priorities.
_________________________________________________________________
NEW ENGLAND
Camp site: Bryant College, Smithfield, R.I., July 19.
1995 finish: 6-10, 4th in East.
New faces: Patriots used No. 1 pick on big-play WR Terry Glenn and
signed ex-Charger Shawn Jefferson to upgrade receiving corps.
Free-agent signee Willie Clay and No. 2 pick Lawyer Milloy projected
as S starters. CB Michael McGruder could help, too. DTs Pio
Sagapolutele and Mark Wheeler to beef up front. OT Larry Tharpe, P-QB
Tom Tupa provide depth. Signed ex-Browns coach Bill Belichick as
defensive coordinator.
Departed: Traded disappointing OT Pat Harlow to Raiders.
Outlook: Is this coach Parcells' last hurrah? Speculation persists
after Parcells clipped a year from contract. Getting QB Drew Bledsoe
back on track after nightmarish ''sophomore'' season (13-16 TD-INT
ratio, just 51% completion rate, shoulder injury) is key. Also,
28th-ranked defense switches to 4-3.
_________________________________________________________________
NEW YORK JETS
Camp: Hofstra University, Hempstead, N.Y., July 13, 19.
1995 finish: 3-13, 5th in East.
New faces: Overhaul of offense is prodded by two key members from
Pittsburgh's Super Bowl XXX squad - QB Neil O'Donnell and coordinator
Ron Erhardt. Used draft's No. 1 pick on Southern California WR
Keyshawn Johnson. Other new targets: ex-Chicago Bear Jeff Graham and
Nevada's Alex Van Dyke, second-round pick. Ex-Giants OT Jumbo Elliott
and journeyman OT Harry Boatswain. QB Frank Reich is No. 2 arm.
Departed: QB Boomer Esiason now in Arizona and C Cal Dixon in Miami.
Outlook: Coach Rich Kotite tries again, backed by big money invested
in offense. Although scat-RB Adrian Murrell was retained (4 years, $6
million deal), consistent power RB is sorely needed for unit that
scored just two rushing TDs in '95. Johnson provides big-play
potential , but it remains to be proven how effective O'Donnell can be
without stellar support.
_________________________________________________________________
OAKLAND
Camp site: Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, Napa, Calif., July
12, 17.
1995 finish: 8-8, 5th in West.
New faces: Ex-Dallas defenders T Russell Maryland and CB Larry Brown.
Drafted TE Rickey Dudley. OL adds bodies with three ex-No. 1 tackles
seeking revivals - Pat Harlow, Lincoln Kennedy and Charles McRae. Ss
Darren Carrington and Lorenzo Lynch add depth.
Departed: G Greg Skrepenak moved to Carolina. S Patrick Bates
unretired for trade to Atlanta.
Outlook: Talented squad started 8-2, then collapsed in '95. Internal
bickering and QB Jeff Hostetler's shoulder injury were contributing
factors. Offense needs to make more strides in coach Mike White's
short passing game and get another big year from RB Harvey Williams.
_________________________________________________________________
PITTSBURGH
Camp: St. Vincent College, Latrobe, Pa., July 15, 18.
1995 finish: 11-5, 1st in Central, lost Super Bowl XXX to Dallas.
New faces: Power RB Jerome Bettis tries to rebound after draft-day
trade from St. Louis. Steelers' power scheme should suit him well.
Physical OL adds ex-Indianapolis OT Will Wolford, who switches to G;
ex-Vikings OT Bernard Dafney; and No. 1 OT Jamaine Stephens. Much is
expected quickly from ex-Penn State FB Jon Wittman, No. 3 pick.
Departed: QB Neil O'Donnell and fired offensive coordinator Ron
Erhart. OLB Kevin Greene opted for Carolina Panthers as free agent.
Leon Searcy moved to Jacksonville Jaguars. FB John L. Williams wasn't
re-signed and drug-convicted RB Bam Morris was cut.
Outlook: Despite losses, talented team will remain in title hunt.
Battle at quarterback between Jim Miller and Kordell Stewart looms,
but given inexperience, position could be unsettled well into season.
New coordinator Chan Gailey, promoted from receivers coach, lends
optimism for smooth transition. Losing Greene expected. Now Steelers
hope replacement Jason Gildon is as good as they think.
_________________________________________________________________
SAN DIEGO
Camp: University of California-San Diego, LaJolla, July 11, 13.
1995 finish: 9-7, 2nd in West, lost wild-card playoff.
New faces: Defense that got pushed around in playoff loss netted DE
Marco Coleman from Miami, LB Kurt Gouveia from Philadelphia and
ex-Atlanta S Kevin Ross. Top pick, second-round WR Bryan Still, adds
speed to receiver corps.
Departed: GM Bobby Beathard and coach Bobby Ross, perturbed by eroding
work ethic and spirit among some key players, cleaned house. RB
Natrone Means was cut, and no effort was made to prevent free-agent
moves by DE Leslie O'Neal and RB Ronnie Harmon. WRs Mark Seay and
Shawn Jefferson and TE Duane Young also expendable. RB Rodney Culver
died in ValuJet crash.
Outlook: To return to Super Bowl form, Chargers need huge
contributions from young players such as second-year RBs Aaron Hayden
and Terrell Fletcher. QB Stan Humphries has plenty of speed with wide
receivers, but group's reliability is unproven. LB Junior Seau remains
centerpiece of defense, which needs DE Chris Mims and DT Reuben Davis
to rebound from off-years.
_________________________________________________________________
SEATTLE
Camp site: Seahawks Headquarters, Kirkland, Wash., July 16, 21.
1995 finish: 8-8, 3rd in West.
New faces: Draft-day deal to land DT Glenn Montgomery from Houston
underlines disappointment in ex-No. 1 pick Sam Adams. Ex-Bengals S
Darryl Williams lured to cut down on excessive big plays allowed. No.
1 pick, G Pete Kendall, starts ASAP. Seahawks spent No. 2 pick on
speedy Fred Thomas. WR Mike Pritchard was late signee.
Departed: FS Eugene Robinson, OT Ray Roberts and LB Duane Bickett.
Outlook: They're still in the Pacific Northwest, after owner Ken
Behring's offseason attempt to move to the Los Angeles area was
thwarted by the NFL, and Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen got option to
buy team. Seahawks will again rely on RB Chris Warren to power rushing
game ranked third in '95. To be legitimate contender, QB Rick Mirer
needs to reverse regression evident with 20 INTs in '95. And defense
that posted third-fewest sacks in '95 must develop pass rush.
_________________________________________________________________
NFC
ARIZONA
Camp: Northern Arizona Univ., Flagstaff, July 18.
1995 finish: 4-12, 5th in East.
New faces: Coach Vince Tobin, who replaces Buddy Ryan. Boomer Esiason
replaces Dave Krieg at QB. In free-agent T Lomas Brown, signed from
Detroit, Cardinals get anchor on left side. Top pick Simeon Rice could
start at DE. No. 2 pick Leeland McElroy puts oomph in return game. No.
3 pick TE Johnny McWilliams should help.
Departed: Ryan, who led the team to 10 wins in two seasons. Krieg.
Free-agent C Ed Cunningham. T Larry Tharpe to New England as a free
agent. S Lorenzo Lynch was released.
Outlook: Cardinals need to show sense of a team concept, get defense
organized (last vs. the run in '95) and develop a fan base. They'll
struggle with payroll in aftermath of some of Ryan's signings, but the
Cardinals are not without talent.
_________________________________________________________________
ATLANTA
Camp: Falcons headquarters, Suwanee, Ga., July 19.
1995 finish: 9-7, 2nd in West. Lost in first round of playoffs.
New faces: Acquisition of LB Cornelius Bennett, DE Dan Owens, LB James
Williams and S Patrick Bates indicate a trend toward improving NFL's
worst pass defense (and second-worst overall defense). Falcons need
more pass rush (30 sacks) and better coverage in a pass-oriented
division.
Departed: DE Chris Doleman and team-high 91/2 sacks. S Kevin Ross'
disagreements with coaching staff led to his release. Falcons traded S
Roger Harper (Dallas), T Lincoln Kennedy (Oakland).
Outlook: Falcons' last five games were decided by total of 14 points
(three losses). Better defense will help. They need to get squared
away at QB, where Jeff George is unsigned, and find a way to get that
Red Gun offense to control time of possession and help the defense.
_________________________________________________________________
CAROLINA
Camp: Wofford College, Spartanburg, S.C., July 18.
1995 finish: 7-9, 4th in West.
New faces: Free-agent pickups CB Eric Davis, TE Wesley Walls, OT Greg
Skrepenak and LBs Kevin Greene and Duane Bickett. Used No. 1 pick on
much-needed RB, Tim Biakabutuka. New backup QB is Steve Beuerlein.
Departed: TE Pete Metzelaars, OT Derrick Graham, RB Derrick Moore,
backup QB Frank Reich, CB Rod Smith.
Outlook: Panthers surprised with 7-9 mark in inaugural season. Defense
might have to carry the Panthers again, at least in early going.
_________________________________________________________________
CHICAGO
Camp: Univ. of Wisconsin-Platteville, July 15.
1995 finish: 9-7, 3rd in Central.
New faces: Fiery MLB Bryan Cox signed as a free agent. C Ed Cunningham
might wind up a starter after major defections along OL. Top pick Walt
Harris is expected to beat out Jeremy Lincoln and start at CB.
Departed: C-G Jay Leeuwenberg and backup OT Troy Auzenne signed with
Colts and OT Scott Adams with Tampa Bay. WR Jeff Graham (82 catches,
1,301 yards) signed with New York Jets. Backup QB Steve Walsh now in
St. Louis.
Outlook: Had 9-7 record the last three years but absent from the
playoffs in '95, the Bears want to break out in a division defined by
the passing game by playing better defense (ranked 27th in NFL in '95)
and running football. Second-year RB Rashaan Salaam has a lot to learn
before Bears dominate on ground. OL in flux and DL has plenty to
prove. DE Alonzo Spellman and Cox must justify the big dollars.
_________________________________________________________________
DALLAS
Camp: St. Edward's Univ., Austin, Texas, July 18.
1995 finish: 12-4, won Super Bowl.
New faces: Capped-out Cowboys for most part stayed away from
free-agent bidding. Brought in LBs Broderick Thomas (Minnesota) and
Fred Strickland (Green Bay) to replace vanished starters. Traded down
in draft, so highest pick is DE Kavika Pittman, a No. 2 from McNeese
State. Third-round WR Stepfret Williams could surprise.
Departed: LBs Robert Jones and Dixon Edwards, DT Russell Maryland, CBs
Larry Brown and Robert Bailey, backup OL Ron Stone. Also lost trainer
Kevin O'Neill to Miami and defensive assistant coach Jim Eddy to
Detroit.
Outlook: Pressure of seeking a fourth Super Bowl win in five years
enormous, even for a team comfortable in the spotlight. Success still
hangs on The Triplets - troubled WR Michael Irvin, RB Emmitt Smith and
QB Troy Aikman. A star corps and solid role players carried the club
the last few years. Now there are questions on both fronts.
_________________________________________________________________
DETROIT
Camp: Pontiac, Mich., July 15, 18.
1995 finish: 10-6, 2nd in Central. Lost in first round of playoffs.
New faces: Michael Brooks (New York Giants) moves in at MLB. Ray
Roberts (Seattle) steps in at OLT. First-round draft picks LB Reggie
Brown and G Jeff Hartings could start as rookies. Rich Camarillo is
the new punter. Cagey veteran TE Pete Metzelaars adds bulk.
Departed: Longtime LOT Lomas Brown left for Arizona. FS Willie Clay (8
INTs) went to New England. LB Chris Spielman went to Buffalo, while LB
Mike Johnson was released. Defense also lost key backups in LB Tracy
Hayworth and DE Dan Owens, both to Atlanta.
Outlook: Lions need to build on last year's close (excluding blowout
playoff loss to Eagles) when they won seven in a row and outscored
opponents 132-34 in final four. They're best positioned to challenge
Green Bay in NFC Central.
_________________________________________________________________
GREEN BAY
Camp: St. Norbert College, West DePere, Wis., July 15-18.
1995 finish: 11-5, 1st in Central. NFC runner-up.
New faces: DT Santana Dotson (Tampa Bay) adds depth. LB Ron Cox fits
the mold. No. 2 pick Derrick Mayes can help at WR right away. No. 4
choice Chris Darkins adds speed at RB.
Departed: Key loss is backup Ty Detmer. With Brett Favre coming back,
depth is most important. Lost LB Fred Strickland and DT John Jurkovic
to free agency, WRs Charles Jordan and Mark Ingram from the offense.
TE Keith Jackson close to contract deal.
Outlook: So much hinges on Favre, 1995 MVP, staying clean and healthy.
He has thrown 71 TD passes last two seasons. Running game lacks
outside speed and cannot take a game over, which puts pressure on the
defense.
_________________________________________________________________
MINNESOTA
Camp: Mankato (Minn.) State Univ., July 21.
1995 finish: 8-8, 4th in Central.
New faces: Avoided high-priced talent, with exception of LB Dixon
Edwards. CB Rod Smith figures in nickel or dime package. No. 1 pick
Duane Clemons played DE at Cal but gets a shot at rush linebacker. No.
2 pick James Manley fills a need at NT. RB Moe Williams, picked No. 3,
joins crowded backfield.
Departed: DE Roy Barker, who teased with potential but had only three
sacks last year. Cut LBs Broderick Thomas and Jack Del Rio. Defensive
coordinator Tony Dungy to Tampa Bay as coach.
Outlook: Vikings lost four games by a TD or less and saw four games go
to OT. They have to find out if oft-injured Robert Smith can be their
every-down RB and help dominate games with ball control. Defense must
continue to make big plays.
_________________________________________________________________
NEW ORLEANS
Camp: Univ. of Wisconsin-La Crosse, July 13, 15.
1995 finish: 7-9, 5th in West.
New faces: Saints signed free agents S Greg Jackson and CB Mark
McMillian, who join ex-Eagles teammate Eric Allen. Added DEs Darren
Mickell and pass-rushing Fred Stokes. Made CB Alex Molden top pick.
Jim Haslett replaces Monte Kiffin as defensive coordinator.
Departed: WR Quinn Early (Buffalo), TE Wesley Walls (Carolina), OT
Richard Cooper (Philadelphia). That's three offensive starters. CB
Jimmy Spencer to Cincinnati.
Outlook: Saints lost first five games last year, four by a combined 12
points. Saints finished 28th in rushing last year. Better defense and
running game always were Mora's ticket.
_________________________________________________________________
N.Y. GIANTS
Camp: SUNY-Albany, Albany, N.Y., July 18.
1995 finish: 5-11, 4th in East.
New faces: Giants won bidding war for ex-Dallas OL Ron Stone (five
years, $10 millin). Solid draft produced potential pass rusher in
first round in Cedric Jones, big WR in Amani Toomer (No. 2) and
hulking OLT in Roman Oben (No. 3). Danny Kanell, picked No. 4, looks
like the No. 3 QB but could unseat Tommy Maddox.
Departed: WR Mike Sherrard, starting OTs (Jumbo Elliott and Doug
Riesenberg) and ill-used LB Michael Brooks. Cut S Vencie Glenn and RB
Herschel Walker. Giants spent money retaining core veterans (QB Dave
Brown, DLs Mike Strahan and Stacy Dillard, RB Rodney Hampton, CB
Phillippi Sparks).
Outlook: Hampton can't carry this team anymore. The Giants need speedy
Thomas Lewis, their No. 1 pick in '94, to be productive. Brown needs
to play in real time. Only two teams had fewer than the Giants' 29
sacks last year, so a big-time rush means a lot.
_________________________________________________________________
PHILADELPHIA
Camp: Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa., July 17, 19.
1995 finish: 10-6, 2nd in East. Lost in divisional playoff.
New faces: QB Ty Detmer, knowledgeable in West Coast offense, should
challenge starter Rodney Peete. OTs Richard Cooper (ex-New Orleans)
and Steve Wallace (ex-49ers) help a line in transition. WR Irving
Fryar steps in for Fred Barnett, who replaces him in Miami; could team
with Mark Seay (ex-Charger) in rebuilt WR corps. CB Troy Vincent
(ex-Miami) helps.
Departed: Eagles released WR Calvin Williams, let Barnett go as a free
agent, have not re-signed OG Guy McIntyre. Defense lost LBs Kurt
Gouveia to San Diego, Bill Romanowski to Denver, CB Mark McMillian and
S Greg Jackson to New Orleans, DE Daniel Stubbs to Miami, backup LB
Derrick Oden to Miami. OL took hits with departure of OT Antone Davis
(Atlanta) and backup Harry Boatswain to Jets.
Outlook: Second-year coach Ray Rhodes seemed to will his team to
victory in '95. Eagles were one of two teams in '95 with winning
record while being outscored (San Diego was other) and can't expect
similar success with that ratio. Seven of 10 wins came in division
games, a key to reaching playoffs.
_________________________________________________________________
ST. LOUIS
Camp: Western Illinois Univ., Macomb, July 14, 18.
1995 finish: 7-9, 3rd in West.
New faces: RB Lawrence Phillips, Rams' top pick, a gamble. DE Leslie
O'Neal adds sack power. LB Robert Jones has good range. QB Steve
Walsh, so effective for Chicago in '94, replaces Chris Miller. No. 1
pick Eddie Kennison might return kicks and add balance to WR corps. CB
Maurice Hurst (neck surgery) could start.
Departed: DE Sean Gilbert traded to Washington. Miller cut after
failing physical (concussions). RB Jerome Bettis dealt to Pittsburgh.
DE Fred Stokes to New Orleans. LB Shane Conlan still unsigned.
Outlook: Second-year coach Rich Brooks got club off to fast start
(4-0) but couldn't prevent a weak finish (0-3). Rams seek first
winning season since 1989 in a division with other improving clubs.
Phillips looks like the make-or-break guy.
_________________________________________________________________
SAN FRANCISCO
Camp site: Sierra College, Rocklin, Calif., July 17, 20.
1995 finish: 11-5, 1st in West. Lost in divisional playoff.
New faces: DE Chris Doleman (ex-Atlanta) fills need for outside
rusher. CB Eric Carter, a standout in Canada, should help replace Eric
Davis. OG Ray Brown adds size and muscle. RBs Johnny Johnson and Tommy
Vardell add backbone in ground game. Ex-coach Bill Walsh returns in
administrative capacity to oversee offense.
Departed: Pro Bowl C Bart Oates retired, as did DE Rickey Jackson. DE
Alfred Williams signed with Denver. Davis signed with Carolina. DE
Dennis Brown, OT Steve Wallace both cut.
Outlook: 49ers reacted with horror after playoff loss to Green Bay.
Offense can put up big numbers but now respects the concept of the
ground game. When they won Super Bowl two years ago, starting CBs were
Davis and Deion Sanders. Now? Marquez Pope and probably Tyronne
Drakeford.
_________________________________________________________________
TAMPA BAY
Camp: Univ. of Tampa, July 21.
1995 finish: 7-9, 5th in Central.
New faces: Tony Dungy gets overdue shot as coach. First three draft
choices (DE Regan Upshaw, DT Marcus Jones, FB Mike Alstott) could all
start. Bucs weren't very active in chasing other teams' free agents,
concentrated on re-signing their own, especially MLB Hardy Nickerson.
Departed: OL Charles McRae, a busted No. 1, to Oakland. DTs Santana
Dotson (Green Bay) and Mark Wheeler (New England). Ex-coach Sam Wyche
to NBC. S Curtis Buckley to San Francisco.
Outlook: Dungy's defenses create turnovers and make big plays. If RB
Errict Rhett reaches contract accord, Bucs could combine better
defense with pounding ground game and take pressure off QB Trent
Dilfer. Ready to contend? Not yet. But don't bet against Dungy's
understated style and motivational skills.
_________________________________________________________________
WASHINGTON
Camp site: Frostburg (Md.) State Univ., July 17.
1995 finish: 6-10, 3rd in East.
New faces: DT Sean Gilbert (trade with St. Louis for No. 1 pick) puts
muscle and mass into middle of line. Bob Dahl (ex-Cleveland) starts at
RG. Bill Brooks (ex-Buffalo) can be an effective third WR. RB Stephen
Davis, a No. 4 pick, could get a long look if Terry Allen's contract
impasse stretches.
Departed: OT Jim Lachey (shoulder) failed a physical at minicamp and
retired. G Ray Brown signed with San Francisco. Reserve OL Vernice
Smith signed with Jets. DT Tim Johnson probably won't return.
Outlook: Both lines look big and powerful, but OL needs time to shape
up with Tre Johnson moving to LG and Cory Raymer battling John Gesek
at C. Coach Norv Turner needs a QB to win the job decisively. Core of
veterans (CB Darrell Green, RB Brian Mitchell, LB Ken Harvey) hunger.
|
9.4455 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jul 11 1996 11:41 | 16 |
|
re .4453
You boys have to actually win something before I have
to eat any crow. The Steelers have done a much better
job than the vast majority of AFC clubs but that hasn't
translated into any new SB rings. As it is, the
Steelers won't get back to the SB this year. No way. In
fact, they'll have their hands full trying to win the lowly
AFC Central. If the Steelers win the SB this year, I'll
show up at the first get together at the OPP afterwards
wearing a prom dress and sing 'Kumbaya'.
|
9.4456 | YUCK! | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Jul 11 1996 11:47 | 8 |
| >If the Steelers win the SB this year, I'll show up at the first get
>together at the OPP afterwards wearing a prom dress and sing 'Kumbaya'.
This looks to be my first year of rooting _against_ the
Steelers. Especially if this is their reward.
billl
|
9.4457 | a real stretch | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jul 11 1996 11:53 | 9 |
| Wow, a real stretch there, Tommy. The simple arithmetic odds are 29-1
against this proposition.
Considering that they've lost about ever one of their backfield and some
of their lines and defense, I'd say that getting to the SB should merit
some performance in drag. Getting to the AFC championship game oughta be
worth some lipstick and rouge.
TTom
|
9.4458 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jul 11 1996 12:15 | 6 |
|
The Vegas odds are 10-1 and they are one of the co-favorites
in the AFC (the Dolphins being the other). Yup, the Steelers
suffered losses, O'Donnell being the only real big one, but
losing him won't hurt all that much. They still play very good
smashmouth football in a weak division.
|
9.4459 | could be interesting | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jul 11 1996 12:53 | 15 |
| re: favored for AFC
The whole conference is definitely up in the air. With the current
structure of free agency, it's impossible to keep a team intact.
Pittsburgh is not the onliest team to lose key players which partially
explains how anyone could possibly list 'em as a favorite. I can see
Miami if for no other reason than Jimmy Johnson.
One up and comer that may be fun to watch is the second year Jaguars.
They've added Natone Means to add some punch to one of the worse
offensives and have strengthene their already good D with drafts and free
agency.
TTom
|
9.4460 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jul 11 1996 13:51 | 29 |
|
Pre-preseason predicitions:
AFC East: Miami
AFC Central: Cincinnati
AFC West: Oakland
Wildcards: Pittsburgh, New England
On the come: Jets
MVP: Dan Marino
Defensive Player Of The Year: Hugh Douglas, NYJ
Offensive Rookie Of The Year: Jonathan Ogden, Ravens
Defensive Rookie Of The Year: Darryl Gardener, Miami
AFC Champ: Miami
NFC East: Cowboys
NFC Central: Detroit
NFC West: San Fran
Wildcards: GB, TB
On the come: Jacksonville
MVP: Herman Moore, Detroit
Defensive Player Of The Year: Eric Swann, Arizona
Offensive Rookie Of The Year: Tim Biakabutuka, Carolina
Defensive Rookie Of The Year: Cedric Jones, NYG
NFC Champ: Detroit
Super Bowl Champ: Miami
|
9.4461 | nice picks | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jul 11 1996 14:11 | 9 |
| Miami to beat Detroit to win it all? Is this crow bait? :-]
One minor nit into a_otherwise fine effort or prognositicting:
> Offensive Rookie Of The Year: Tim Biakabutuka, Carolina
That be his adopted name. He's gone back to the original Tshimanga.
TTom
|
9.4462 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Thu Jul 11 1996 15:09 | 15 |
|
>> Miami to beat Detroit to win it all? Is this crow bait? :-]
I couldn't very well pick Miami vs. Dallas like I'm sure
90% of the pundits will. Or Aikman, Young or Favre for
NFC MVP.
>> He's gone back to the original Tshimanga.
He can call himself Ishmael but no matter, he's fine back
without the excess baggage of Lawrence Philips. Another guy
that I think will be a fine pro is OT Pete Kendall from Boston
College.
|
9.4463 | need some help on D | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Jul 11 1996 15:18 | 13 |
| I withca Tommy.
Detroit aint a half bad option. I don't see Miami getting there unless
there's some miraculous transition on the defensive of things. The Fish
lost Bryan Cox, which may help with the head case but he's a helluva LB,
Marco Coleman, another LB and CB Troy Vincent.
It looks like Del Rio is pencilled in for the middle. BTW, lasted year as
a commentator, Johnson said that he was sorry when Del Rio left the
Cowboys cause he woulda been his starter at MLB, presumably instead of
Ken Norton.
TTom
|
9.4464 | even JJ can't make diamonds outa horse dung | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Jul 11 1996 16:43 | 7 |
| > I can see Miami if for no other reason than Jimmy Johnson.
Didn't we hear the same about the Pats and Parcells
in his "rookie" year?
billl
|
9.4465 | | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Thu Jul 11 1996 21:11 | 23 |
| The top 4/conference before preseason. After preseason, I will
make other predictions since preseason injuries usually takes out
good players which will effect teams.
AFC:
Miami, KC, Pitt, Buff (ick)....My bronco's will be close, but still
need defense, as does the fish, but
their offense will be # 1-3.
NFC:
Dallas, GB, SF, Phil.
SB: NFC just do to track record.
I think/hope the AFC will win one in next 2 years since FA is
balancing the conferences little by little.
Tim
|
9.4466 | Let's just get it over with now | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Fri Jul 12 1996 00:02 | 17 |
| Tommy Brydie, I'm not going to argue with you this season about the
Pittsburgh Steelers. Instead we are going to make the first 3 p-name
bets of the NFL season right now.
1st: Pittsburgh will win the AFC Central
2nd: Pittsburgh will win the AFC Championship game
3rd: Pittsburgh will win the Super Bowl (especially if they get to
play Detroit.)
P-names will last for 2 weeks with a minimum of 10 entries per week.
I know you will accept these 3 wages since you will lose a lot of
"face" and credibility in here if you don't.
D.J.
|
9.4467 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | It's Baseball And You're An American | Fri Jul 12 1996 09:45 | 3 |
| >> He's gone back to the original Tshimanga.
We'll see how long this lasts come endorsement time...
|
9.4468 | not fer sure | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jul 12 1996 10:53 | 8 |
| A foreign/ethnic/doesn't-sound-merkin name ain't the barrier it used to
be. I think ever one should thank Kareem for being on forefront for that.
And Ahmad Rashad is doing pretty good after growing up as Bobby Moore.
And even close there's that Ki-Jana guy in Chicago.
TTom
|
9.4469 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Fri Jul 12 1996 10:58 | 6 |
| <<< Note 9.4468 by HBAHBA::HAAS "more madness, less horror" >>>
-< not fer sure >-
>And even close there's that Ki-Jana guy in Chicago.
Cincy.
|
9.4470 | there and another | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jul 12 1996 11:01 | 3 |
| There too :-]
... and Rashann Salaam is in Chicago, yet.
|
9.4471 | some signings | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jul 12 1996 14:29 | 16 |
| Meanwhile in the NFL a couple of transcations of note.
Herschel Walker has signed on with the Cowboys. He's gonna be a 3rd down
specialist who may play special teams. Rumor is that his job will be to
watch after Michael Irvin if'n Irvin gets out.
Keith Jackson re-signed with Green Bay for a couple of years.
And Big Bad John Elway says that he may retire in a couple of years and
not play the full 5 that he recently re-upped for. Of course, there's the
remote prospect that the Donk might win something.
The 49ers signed identical twin brothers Sean and Sam Manual to identical
contracts. Word is that they'll wear identical numbers.
TTom
|
9.4472 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Fri Jul 12 1996 14:32 | 1 |
9.4473 | maybe | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Jul 12 1996 14:36 | 17 |
| ... not yet.
He stayed outta jail but he has to do some community time and he's in
effect on probation for 6 years. I wonder what the odds are on whether or
not he can keep it together that long.
In a_interview, he made it out like Cowher was out to get him and just
waiting for something like cocaine distribution for a reason.
In any case, if'n Bam can toe the line, the charges will be dropped.
Maybe somebody will field a team with all these guys like Larry Phillips,
Eric Green, Barry Foster, etc.
Y'all sure Albert Belle aint a football players?
TTom
|
9.4474 | where he'll stop nobody knows | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Fri Jul 12 1996 19:14 | 5 |
| Hershel is back in Dallas. The full circle for his nfl career is
complete. The funny thing is, Emmitt was one of the #1 picks that the
vikes gave for Hershel.
Tim
|
9.4475 | NFL Schedule | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jul 15 1996 09:26 | 3 |
| Is there a posting of the NFL schedule anywhere???
Tony
|
9.4476 | such as it is | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jul 15 1996 11:33 | 363 |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------
1996 NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE SCHEDULE
(ALL TIMES LOCAL)
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 1 (FIRST WEEKEND)
NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
1. ARIZONA AT INDIANAPOLIS 12:00
2. ATLANTA AT CAROLINA 1:00
3. CINCINNATI AT ST LOUIS 12:00
4. DETROIT AT MINNESOTA 12:00
5. GREEN BAY AT TAMPA BAY 4:00
6. KANSAS CITY AT HOUSTON 12:00
7. NEW ENGLAND AT MIAMI 4:00
8. NEW ORLEANS AT SAN FRANCISCO 1:00
9. NEW YORK JETS AT DENVER 2:00
10. OAKLAND AT BALTIMORE 1:00
11. PHILADELPHIA AT WASHINGTON 1:00
12. PITTSBURGH AT JACKSONVILLE 1:00
13. SEATTLE AT SAN DIEGO 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 1
14. BUFFALO AT NEW YORK GIANTS 8:00
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 2
15. DALLAS AT CHICAGO 8:00
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 8 (SECOND WEEKEND)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
16. BALTIMORE AT PITTSBURGH 1:00
17. CAROLINA AT NEW ORLEANS 12:00
18. CHICAGO AT WASHINGTON 1:00
19. CINCINNATI AT SAN DIEGO 1:00
20. DENVER AT SEATTLE 1:00
21. HOUSTON AT JACKSONVILLE 1:00
22. INDIANAPOLIS AT NEW YORK JETS 1:00
23. MINNESOTA AT ATLANTA 1:00
24. NEW ENGLAND AT BUFFALO 1:00
25. NEW YORK GIANTS AT DALLAS 3:00
26. OAKLAND AT KANSAS CITY 12:00
27. ST LOUIS AT SAN FRANCISCO 1:00
28. TAMPA BAY AT DETROIT 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 8
29. MIAMI AT ARIZONA 5:00
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9
30. PHILADELPHIA AT GREEN BAY 8:00
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 15 (THIRD WEEKEND)
(OPEN DATES: ATLANTA, CAROLINA, ST LOUIS , SAN FRANCISCO)
NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
31. ARIZONA AT NEW ENGLAND 1:00
32. BALTIMORE AT HOUSTON 12:00
33. DETROIT AT PHILADELPHIA 1:00
34. INDIANAPOLIS AT DALLAS 3:00
35. JACKSONVILLE AT OAKLAND 1:00
36. KANSAS CITY AT SEATTLE 1:00
37. MINNESOTA AT CHICAGO 12:00
38. NEW ORLEANS AT CINCINNATI 1:00
39. NEW YORK JETS AT MIAMI 1:00
40. SAN DIEGO AT GREEN BAY 12:00
41. WASHINGTON AT NEW YORK GIANTS 4:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 15
42. TAMPA BAY AT DENVER 6:00
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 16
43. BUFFALO AT PITTSBURGH 9:00
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 22 (FOURTH WEEKEND)
(OPEN DATES: BALTIMORE, CINCINNATI, HOUSTON, PITTSBURGH)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
44. ARIZONA AT NEW ORLEANS 12:00
45. CHICAGO AT DETROIT 4:00
46. DALLAS AT BUFFALO 4:00
47. DENVER AT KANSAS CITY 12:00
48. GREEN BAY AT MINNESOTA 12:00
49. JACKSONVILLE AT NEW ENGLAND 4:00
50. NEW YORK GIANTS AT NEW YORK JETS 1:00
51. SAN DIEGO AT OAKLAND 1:00
52. SAN FRANCISCO AT CAROLINA 1:00
53. SEATTLE AT TAMPA BAY 1:00
54. WASHINGTON AT ST LOUIS 12:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 22
55. PHILADELPHIA AT ATLANTA 8:00
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23
56. MIAMI AT INDIANAPOLIS 8:00
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 29 (FIFTH WEEKEND)
(OPEN DATES: BUFFALO, INDIANAPOLIS, MIAMI, NEW ENGLAND)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
57. ATLANTA AT SAN FRANCISCO 1:00
58. CAROLINA AT JACKSONVILLE 1:00
59. DENVER AT CINCINNATI 1:00
60. DETROIT AT TAMPA BAY 1:00
61. GREEN BAY AT SEATTLE 1:00
62. HOUSTON AT PITTSBURGH 1:00
63. KANSAS CITY AT SAN DIEGO 1:00
64. MINNESOTA AT NEW YORK GIANTS 1:00
65. NEW ORLEANS AT BALTIMORE 1:00
66. OAKLAND AT CHICAGO 12:00
67. ST LOUIS AT ARIZONA 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, SEPTEMBER 29
68. NEW YORK JETS AT WASHINGTON 8:00
MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 30
69. DALLAS AT PHILADELPHIA 9:00
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 6 (SIXTH WEEKEND)
(OPEN DATES: ARIZONA, DALLAS, NY GIANTS, PHILADELPHIA, TAMPA BAY,
WASHINGTON)
NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
70. ATLANTA AT DETROIT 1:00
71. CAROLINA AT MINNESOTA 12:00
72. GREEN BAY AT CHICAGO 12:00
73. INDIANAPOLIS AT BUFFALO 4:00
74. JACKSONVILLE AT NEW ORLEANS 3:00
75. NEW ENGLAND AT BALTIMORE 1:00
76. OAKLAND AT NEW YORK JETS 1:00
77. SAN DIEGO AT DENVER 2:00
78. SAN FRANCISCO AT ST LOUIS 3:00
79. SEATTLE AT MIAMI 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, OCTOBER 6
80. HOUSTON AT CINCINNATI 8:00
MONDAY, OCTOBER 7
81. PITTSBURGH AT KANSAS CITY 8:00
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 13 (SEVENTH WEEKEND)
(OPEN DATES: DENVER, KANSAS CITY, SAN DIEGO, SEATTLE)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
82. ARIZONA AT DALLAS 12:00
83. CHICAGO AT NEW ORLEANS 12:00
84. CINCINNATI AT PITTSBURGH 1:00
85. DETROIT AT OAKLAND 1:00
86. HOUSTON AT ATLANTA 1:00
87. MIAMI AT BUFFALO 1:00
88. MINNESOTA AT TAMPA BAY 1:00
89. NEW YORK JETS AT JACKSONVILLE 1:00
90. PHILADELPHIA AT NEW YORK GIANTS 4:00
91. ST LOUIS AT CAROLINA 1:00
92. WASHINGTON AT NEW ENGLAND 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, OCTOBER 13
93. BALTIMORE AT INDIANAPOLIS 7:00
MONDAY, OCTOBER 14
94. SAN FRANCISCO AT GREEN BAY 8:00
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17 (EIGHTH WEEKEND)
(OPEN DATES: CHICAGO, DETROIT, GREEN BAY, MINNESOTA)
NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
95. SEATTLE AT KANSAS CITY 7:00
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 20
96. ATLANTA AT DALLAS 12:00
97. BALTIMORE AT DENVER 2:00
98. BUFFALO AT NEW YORK JETS 4:00
99. CINCINNATI AT SAN FRANCISCO 1:00
100. JACKSONVILLE AT ST LOUIS 3:00
101. MIAMI AT PHILADELPHIA 1:00
102. NEW ENGLAND AT INDIANAPOLIS 12:00
103. NEW ORLEANS AT CAROLINA 1:00
104. NEW YORK GIANTS AT WASHINGTON 1:00
105. PITTSBURGH AT HOUSTON 3:00
106. TAMPA BAY AT ARIZONA 1:00
MONDAY, OCTOBER 21
107. OAKLAND AT SAN DIEGO 6:00
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 27 (NINTH WEEKEND)
(OPEN DATES: NEW ORLEANS, OAKLAND)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
108. CAROLINA AT PHILADELPHIA 1:00
109. DALLAS AT MIAMI 4:00
110. INDIANAPOLIS AT WASHINGTON 1:00
111. JACKSONVILLE AT CINCINNATI 1:00
112. KANSAS CITY AT DENVER 2:00
113. NEW YORK GIANTS AT DETROIT 1:00
114. NEW YORK JETS AT ARIZONA 2:00
115. PITTSBURGH AT ATLANTA 1:00
116. ST LOUIS AT BALTIMORE 1:00
117. SAN DIEGO AT SEATTLE 1:00
118. SAN FRANCISCO AT HOUSTON 12:00
119. TAMPA BAY AT GREEN BAY 12:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, OCTOBER 27
120. BUFFALO AT NEW ENGLAND 8:00
MONDAY, OCTOBER 28
121. CHICAGO AT MINNESOTA 8:00
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 3 (TENTH WEEKEND)
(OPEN DATES: JACKSONVILLE, NY JETS)
NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
122. ARIZONA AT NEW YORK GIANTS 1:00
123. CAROLINA AT ATLANTA 1:00
124. CINCINNATI AT BALTIMORE 1:00
125. DETROIT AT GREEN BAY 12:00
126. HOUSTON AT SEATTLE 1:00
127. KANSAS CITY AT MINNESOTA 12:00
128. MIAMI AT NEW ENGLAND 4:00
129. PHILADELPHIA AT DALLAS 12:00
130. ST LOUIS AT PITTSBURGH 1:00
131. SAN DIEGO AT INDIANAPOLIS 1:00
132. TAMPA BAY AT CHICAGO 12:00
133. WASHINGTON AT BUFFALO 4:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, NOVEMBER 3
134. SAN FRANCISCO AT NEW ORLEANS 7:00
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 4
135. DENVER AT OAKLAND 6:00
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 10 (ELEVENTH WEEKEND)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
136. ARIZONA AT WASHINGTON 1:00
137. ATLANTA AT ST LOUIS 12:00
138. BALTIMORE AT JACKSONVILLE 4:00
139. BUFFALO AT PHILADELPHIA 1:00
140. CHICAGO AT DENVER 2:00
141. DALLAS AT SAN FRANCISCO 1:00
142. GREEN BAY AT KANSAS CITY 12:00
143. HOUSTON AT NEW ORLEANS 12:00
144. INDIANAPOLIS AT MIAMI 1:00
145. MINNESOTA AT SEATTLE 1:00
146. NEW ENGLAND AT NEW YORK JETS 1:00
147. OAKLAND AT TAMPA BAY 1:00
148. PITTSBURGH AT CINCINNATI 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, NOVEMBER 10
149. NEW YORK GIANTS AT CAROLINA 8:00
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 11
150. DETROIT AT SAN DIEGO 6:00
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 17 (TWELFTH WEEKEND)
NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
151. BALTIMORE AT SAN FRANCISCO 1:00
152. CAROLINA AT ST LOUIS 12:00
153. CHICAGO AT KANSAS CITY 12:00
154. CINCINNATI AT BUFFALO 1:00
155. DENVER AT NEW ENGLAND 1:00
156. JACKSONVILLE AT PITTSBURGH 1:00
157. MIAMI AT HOUSTON 3:00
158. NEW ORLEANS AT ATLANTA 1:00
159. NEW YORK GIANTS AT ARIZONA 2:00
160. NEW YORK JETS AT INDIANAPOLIS 1:00
161. SEATTLE AT DETROIT 1:00
162. TAMPA BAY AT SAN DIEGO 1:00
163. WASHINGTON AT PHILADELPHIA 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, NOVEMBER 17
164. MINNESOTA AT OAKLAND 5:00
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 18
165. GREEN BAY AT DALLAS 8:00
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 24 (THIRTEENTH WEEKEND)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
166. ATLANTA AT CINCINNATI 1:00
167. CAROLINA AT HOUSTON 12:00
168. DALLAS AT NEW YORK GIANTS 4:00
169. DENVER AT MINNESOTA 12:00
170. DETROIT AT CHICAGO 12:00
171. INDIANAPOLIS AT NEW ENGLAND 1:00
172. JACKSONVILLE AT BALTIMORE 1:00
173. NEW ORLEANS AT TAMPA BAY 1:00
174. NEW YORK JETS AT BUFFALO 1:00
175. OAKLAND AT SEATTLE 1:00
176. PHILADELPHIA AT ARIZONA 2:00
177. SAN DIEGO AT KANSAS CITY 12:00
178. SAN FRANCISCO AT WASHINGTON 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, NOVEMBER 24
179. GREEN BAY AT ST LOUIS 7:00
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25
180. PITTSBURGH AT MIAMI 9:00
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 28 (FOURTEENTH WEEKEND)
NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
181. KANSAS CITY AT DETROIT 12:30
182. WASHINGTON AT DALLAS 3:00
SUNDAY, DECEMBER 1
183. ARIZONA AT MINNESOTA 12:00
184. BUFFALO AT INDIANAPOLIS 1:00
185. CHICAGO AT GREEN BAY 12:00
186. CINCINNATI AT JACKSONVILLE 1:00
187. HOUSTON AT NEW YORK JETS 4:00
188. MIAMI AT OAKLAND 1:00
189. NEW YORK GIANTS AT PHILADELPHIA 1:00
190. PITTSBURGH AT BALTIMORE 1:00
191. ST LOUIS AT NEW ORLEANS 3:00
192. SEATTLE AT DENVER 2:00
193. TAMPA BAY AT CAROLINA 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, DECEMBER 1
194. NEW ENGLAND AT SAN DIEGO 5:00
MONDAY, DECEMBER 2
195. SAN FRANCISCO AT ATLANTA 9:00
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 5 (FIFTEENTH WEEKEND)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
196. PHILADELPHIA AT INDIANAPOLIS 8:00
SUNDAY, DECEMBER 8
197. ATLANTA AT NEW ORLEANS 12:00
198. BALTIMORE AT CINCINNATI 1:00
199. BUFFALO AT SEATTLE 1:00
200. CAROLINA AT SAN FRANCISCO 1:00
201. DALLAS AT ARIZONA 2:00
202. DENVER AT GREEN BAY 12:00
203. JACKSONVILLE AT HOUSTON 12:00
204. NEW YORK GIANTS AT MIAMI 1:00
205. NEW YORK JETS AT NEW ENGLAND 4:00
206. ST LOUIS AT CHICAGO 12:00
207. SAN DIEGO AT PITTSBURGH 1:00
208. WASHINGTON AT TAMPA BAY 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, DECEMBER 8
209. MINNESOTA AT DETROIT 8:00
MONDAY, DECEMBER 9
210. KANSAS CITY AT OAKLAND 6:00
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 14 (SIXTEENTH WEEKEND)
NBC-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
211. PHILADELPHIA AT NEW YORK JETS 12:30
212. SAN DIEGO AT CHICAGO 3:00
SUNDAY, DECEMBER 15
213. BALTIMORE AT CAROLINA 1:00
214. CINCINNATI AT HOUSTON 12:00
215. GREEN BAY AT DETROIT 1:00
216. INDIANAPOLIS AT KANSAS CITY 12:00
217. NEW ENGLAND AT DALLAS 12:00
218. NEW ORLEANS AT NEW YORK GIANTS 1:00
219. OAKLAND AT DENVER 2:00
220. ST LOUIS AT ATLANTA 1:00
221. SAN FRANCISCO AT PITTSBURGH 1:00
222. TAMPA BAY AT MINNESOTA 12:00
223. WASHINGTON AT ARIZONA 2:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, DECEMBER 15
224. SEATTLE AT JACKSONVILLE 8:00
MONDAY, DECEMBER 16
225. BUFFALO AT MIAMI 9:00
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 21 (SEVENTEENTH WEEKEND)
FOX-TV NATIONAL WEEKEND
226. NEW ENGLAND AT NEW YORK GIANTS 12:30
227. NEW ORLEANS AT ST LOUIS 3:00
SUNDAY, DECEMBER 22
228. ARIZONA AT PHILADELPHIA 1:00
229. ATLANTA AT JACKSONVILLE 1:00
230. CHICAGO AT TAMPA BAY 1:00
231. DALLAS AT WASHINGTON 4:00
232. HOUSTON AT BALTIMORE 1:00
233. INDIANAPOLIS AT CINCINNATI 1:00
234. KANSAS CITY AT BUFFALO 1:00
235. MIAMI AT NEW YORK JETS 1:00
236. MINNESOTA AT GREEN BAY 12:00
237. PITTSBURGH AT CAROLINA 1:00
238. SEATTLE AT OAKLAND 1:00
SUNDAY NIGHT, DECEMBER 22
239. DENVER AT SAN DIEGO 5:00
MONDAY, DECEMBER 23
240. DETROIT AT SAN FRANCISCO 6:00
POSTSEASON
Saturday, Dec. 28 AFC and NFC Wild Card Playoffs (ABC)
Sunday, Dec. 29 AFC and NFC Wild Card Playoffs (NBC and
FOX)
Saturday, Jan. 4 AFC and NFC Divisional Playoffs (NBC and
FOX)
Sunday, Jan. 5 AFC and NFC Divisional Playoffs (NBC and
FOX)
Sunday, Jan. 12 AFC and NFC Championship Games (NBC and
FOX)
Sunday, Jan. 26 Super Bowl XXXI at the Superdome in (FOX)
New Orleans
Sunday, Feb. 2 AFC-NFC Pro Bowl at Honolulu, Hawaii (ABC)
|
9.4477 | Steinberg making some bucks, too | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Mon Jul 15 1996 16:11 | 12 |
| re: all this talk about the NBA free agents...
Wail, it's free agent season in the NFL too and lest we think that Falk
is a point off the curve in terms of controlling a bunch of money, Lee
Steinberg, the premier NFL agent who manages, among others, Painters' QB
Kerry Collins, has already close deals in excess of 137 million. His cut,
a nifty 5+ mil and the count and amount continue to go up.
This all comes to a_end tomorrow when the Free Agency sweepstakes is
over.
TTom
|
9.4478 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Jul 16 1996 08:15 | 8 |
|
Irvin cops a plea suprise suprise....Now he can go back to the White House for
a month party his ass off and get clean before october when he takes the field.
The NFL has to give him the minimun 4 weeks off or loose all credibility with
fans and players a like. Missing 4 games ought to cost him first round status
in a few FFL leagues.
mike
|
9.4479 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Tue Jul 16 1996 09:00 | 6 |
| he's never been a first rounder, at least not in an eight team league.
Just another Cowboy FFL stiff like Troy boy.
Emitt is THE FFL GOD
Jimbo
|
9.4480 | one of my favs | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jul 16 1996 09:26 | 11 |
| Curb your tongue, knave.
I got Irvin in FFL_C and he's a main among receivers. Lasted year his TDs
dropped but I'd put him agin most of 'em over any period of time.
Emmitt and Rice are both already in the FFLHoF.
FWIW, my other wide out is footloose and fancy free Andre "I'd rather
make nothin than a lousy million" Rison.
TTom
|
9.4481 | | TPSYS::BROOKS | | Tue Jul 16 1996 11:48 | 9 |
| This was kind of a Joke from the get go, the drugs were found in the
room but not on Michael so I had a feeling he would get off clean. The
plea bargin was to end it quickly if it went to trial he may have
got an even smaller sentence...
Now on the NFL rules, he did not fail a drug test and was not arrested
with drugs on his possesion, does his plea bargin of pleading No
Contest to a lesser charge carry an automatic 4 game suspension for
1st offenders ?
|
9.4482 | | SALEM::DODA | A little too smart for a big dumb town | Tue Jul 16 1996 11:55 | 8 |
| Right. He pleaded it out to avoid a trial where he could have
been found guilty and done some serious time.
Tell you what, you get caught in a motel room with a couple
hookers and some blow and tell the cops it's not yours and you're
completely innocent. You really think you'd walk?
daryll
|
9.4483 | happens | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jul 16 1996 12:06 | 10 |
| If'n you're a firsted offender and not a celebrity and someone else
claims the stuff is theirs, there is a good chance that you could walk.
Once the stuff is claimed, there's only minor stuff they can get you on
anyway.
Laws vary from state to state but in NC most likely you'd walk, either
free or cheap.
TTom
|
9.4484 | | TPSYS::BROOKS | | Tue Jul 16 1996 12:53 | 22 |
| A good friend of mine got busted in a sting attempting to buy Coke
and got probation (1st offense). And I know several other that were
pulled over for speeding and then got charged with possesion of a
class D (I beleive thats what they call coke) and both got just
probation (1st offense).
I would guess that 99% of all offenders busted for there 1st offense
on JUST POSSESION CHARGES (Not a large enough bust to tack on Dealing)
get probation/fine and go home. Read the police beat for the local
towns and you see a string of arrests for possesion do you think they
all go to jail ? I dont condone drug usage but I do know a handful
of people that smoke grass and/or do coke and even though I think there
foolish I don't consider them HardCore criminals that should be locked
up....
Now what they should do is simple change the law and say OK if you
arrested for possesion you simple go to jail until you give us the
name and testify against the person you got it from.. So as you
work you way up the ladder someone either keeps rolling over on the
next step up or spends there life in Jail :-)
MaB
|
9.4485 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Jul 16 1996 13:03 | 4 |
| What they should do is legalize the stuff. Why is ok to put alcohol in your
system but not pot or heroin for that matter? Sure would save the taxpayers
a hell of lot money. Less court cases, decrease the need to build more jails,
the need to hire more cops etc etc wow..........
|
9.4486 | Or maybe that is a social issue | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Tue Jul 16 1996 13:06 | 9 |
|
> What they should do is legalize the stuff. Why is ok to put alcohol in your
> system but not pot or heroin for that matter?
I don't care about the social issues; I just wanted Michael Irvin
out of my system...
glenn
|
9.4487 | Legalizing it would be the easy way out | TPSYS::BROOKS | | Tue Jul 16 1996 13:13 | 13 |
| -2, Ive tossed around the idea in my head and said similiar things
but If you look at the death's caused/related to alcohol would you
really want to increase that by having 3 to 5 times more people
behind the wheel of a car with no control....
Ya legalizing drugs would possible cut down on drug related crimes
/deaths but they would increase on the other end...
But hey the kids today don't need these drugs when they can just
Inhale glade.???????. I wonder who the first moroon was to inhale
air freshner
mab
|
9.4488 | my view | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Jul 16 1996 13:19 | 15 |
| And don't fergit PAM, MairB.
Put me down as one favoring legalization. I think they oughta make
alcohol, reefer and tobacco all the same.
You oughta haveto sign heroin, cocaine and the like but otherwise they
should be legal.
All this stuff about more deaths, more accidents, etc. may be true but
right now, they're dropping like flies anyway and us innocents have lost
several significant consitututional rights becuase of it.
End of Soapbox.
TTom
|
9.4489 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Tue Jul 16 1996 13:24 | 14 |
|
I think you over estimate the increase there MAir. First off anybody who
abuse drugs more than likely also abuse alcohol unless they have some medical
condition that won't allow them to drink so no increase there. Second most
stone cold junkies uses their car only to go cop then head home, fix themselves
up and then nod off in their homes if they have one. Third anyone who is a
social drug user is probably smart enough to use a designate driver much like
good social drinker do..........
and even if all that wasn't true wouldn't the decrease in drug-related crime
deaths somewhat balance the scales?
mike
|
9.4490 | I know that I'd be fired and Killed by my wife | BSS::RIGGEN | | Tue Jul 16 1996 13:26 | 12 |
| First BAM Morris gets caught with a personal use of 6 lbs of marijuana.
Pittsburgh did right by telling him to find a job elsewhere. Paul
Tagliblue(sp) then only gives the guy a 4 game sentence, Even Steve
Howe gotta tougher sentence.
Now Mike Irvin Cops a plea and is expected to get the same slap on the
wrist, without a single word from the Cowboys ??
The guy shouldn't be allowed to spend an extra month training he should
be asked to play NT against the Raiders for training camp.
Jeff
|
9.4491 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Are you a Turtle? | Tue Jul 16 1996 14:01 | 14 |
|
Jeff,
What can the Cowboys say? The league imposed the weak suspension
not the Cowboys. I'm suprised he did not get some community service
time. He'll have to live with all of the bad press and what the fans
will say and do for who knows how long. We still have the case were
the man with money gets off with little if any jail time.
Some say the coke is God's way of telling you that you make too much
money. If we bar every player that does some blow during the off season
the NFL would not be worth watching. I do not condone the use, but it's
going to happen in todays world.
|
9.4492 | 2 sides to this coin | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Jul 16 1996 14:06 | 4 |
9.4493 | whatever happened to improvement? | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Jul 16 1996 14:09 | 4 |
9.4494 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Tue Jul 16 1996 14:18 | 7 |
|
>> Maybe they should make alcohol illegal too.
They did. They called it Prohibition and it was the
single largest factor in the rise of organized crime
in this country.
|
9.4495 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jul 16 1996 14:37 | 19 |
| I don't often jump into these debates, but the way I see it, bottom line,
people are responsible for their actions.
We don't all agree with the laws that are legislated in this land. Some folks
don't agree with the illegality of drugs, some folks don't agree with the
current crop of firearm laws, other folks are peeved at the income tax laws
etc.
However you look at it, it's the hand we're dealt, and our actions are supposed
to conform to the laws. If they don't, you get into trouble, and some sort of
penalty is obstensibly imposed.
Unfortunately today, there is rather large tendency to blame one's personal
screwups on someone else. If you spill hot coffee on your lap because you were
too dumb to secure it before driving off, blame McDonald's. If you get into
trouble, blame it on the system that created you.
I don't know where it will all end, but I guarantee you, it sure is interesting
to watch.....
|
9.4496 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Tue Jul 16 1996 16:58 | 3 |
9.4497 | A Different Tune | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jul 16 1996 17:45 | 11 |
| re: -2
I don't think Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Paul Revere,
Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, and others beat to that drum!
We should be sovereign citizens of the united states of America
not Citizens (subjects) of the Unites States (Federal govt.)
Yah...it is interesting all right!!!!
Tony
|
9.4498 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Jul 17 1996 08:25 | 5 |
| All those who expect to see Michael Irvin on the side of the road picking
trash please raise your hand. Nice tough talk there Judge but if you were
really serious you could have enforced your own punishment..........
mike
|
9.4499 | | TPSYS::BROOKS | | Wed Jul 17 1996 09:05 | 7 |
| The paper says he got 800hrs of cummunity service, plus a 10K fine.
I bet if you compared this charge to all the other 1st time offenders
he got as much or more community service hrs and a bigger fine...
Don't judge him on how much $ he has but by the law...
MaB
|
9.4500 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Jul 17 1996 09:42 | 21 |
| > We should be sovereign citizens of the united states of America
> not Citizens (subjects) of the Unites States (Federal govt.)
That's nice in theory.
I just read a recent article on this in the op-ed page of my local paper.
The upshot, with which I happen to agree, is that in order to form a nation, we
give up some measure of our theortically unlimited personal freedoms to enjoy
that nationhood.
Otherwise, we would be, in essence, a bunch of armed tribes constantly
defending ourselves.
I'm personally not in favor of a huge amount of federal government (guess that
puts me more in line with some of the founding fathers) but I don't mind giving
up a few rights "in order to form a more perfect union."
'Saw
|
9.4501 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Jul 17 1996 14:59 | 12 |
9.4502 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Jul 17 1996 15:16 | 3 |
| Good points, Mike.
The times they are a-changin'.....8^)
|
9.4503 | a theme | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Jul 17 1996 15:24 | 3 |
| >The times they are a-changin'.....8^)
And it'll prolly continue long past we're all gone.
|
9.4504 | | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Set the drag just right! | Wed Jul 17 1996 17:37 | 8 |
| Irvin got 800 hrs? Thats more than I thought he would, but I'm with
ya Mike, he won't be poking trash, or picking it up alongside the road
either;-)
He praised his wife for being there for him. She could have dumped
him and took him for lots o'$$$'s, but didn't, yet...
Tim
|
9.4505 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Donnie Baseball Yankee HOFer!!! | Wed Jul 17 1996 17:44 | 10 |
|
I heard the first part of his 800 hours was to indeed pick up trash
on the highway. The court decides your service not your agent. I also
heard alot of the time will be spent with the DARE program and other
kid related activities.
Chap
|
9.4506 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Are you a Turtle? | Wed Jul 17 1996 17:53 | 6 |
|
With any luck he'll do something worthwhile for the community. Many
times someone will get into this type of mess and come out a better
person. If that happens maybe he can relay his mistake to those in need
and make a positive experience for everyone. I do not know if Irvin's
the type. To much of a showboat, that needs better direction.
|
9.4507 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | watchman on the wall | Wed Jul 17 1996 18:28 | 3 |
9.4508 | waiting for an answer | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Wed Jul 17 1996 22:14 | 4 |
| Hey Tommy, are you ignoring my "p-name challenge" in note .4466 or
didn't you see it yet??
D.J.
|
9.4509 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove. | Fri Jul 19 1996 10:22 | 4 |
|
I ain't ignoring your challenge. In the interests of fairness
I'll even give you 2:1 odds on the AFC title game and the SB.
|
9.4510 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | Are you a Turtle? | Fri Jul 26 1996 13:56 | 31 |
|
Five players/coaches will be inducted to the NFL HoF tommorow.
Lou Creekmur
1950-59 Detroit Lions. A second round draft choice from William and Mary.
Played Guard on offense and on short yardage defense. All NFL Guard in
51 & 52 Tackle in 53, 54, 56, 57
Charlie Joiner
Houston 69-72, Cincinnatti 72-75, San Diego 76-86 18 seasons. A fourth
round pick in 69 by the Oilers. Had 750 catches for 12,146 yards and 65
TD's. He played more seasons at receiver than anyone in NFL history.
Mel Renfro
Cornerback and Safety a second round pick of the Cowboys in 64. Played
14 years with the Cowboys. All-NFL 65,69 All-Pro 71,72 All-NFC 70,71,73
52 interception for 626 yards and 3 td's
Dan Dierdorf
Tackle second round pick for the Cardinals in 71. Played 13 season
All-Pro 75->78, 80 Our favorite MNF announcer!!
Joe Gibbs
Coach Washington Redskins 12 seasons 81-92 NFL Coy 82,83,91
124-60 regular season 16-50-0 postseason 3 WB wins(Miami,Denver,Buffalo)
1 defeat( Raiders last NFC loss in SB)
|
9.4511 | The Depressing State of the Packers Offensive Line | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Aug 13 1996 14:13 | 32 |
| Any Green Bay Packer fans out there who can give me a player by
player assessment of their offensive line?
Worst case scenario is that the team is dead before the season
even started.
Starters:
LT - Ruettgers - knee sore, not responding, may never play again.
LG - Aaron Taylor. Blew out his knee in playoffs against Falcons.
Similar injury two years ago took a full year.
RG - Harry Galbreath. Jumped to another team.
Others -
Some guard moved to starting left tackle I heard suspected of drug
abuse and may be out for the year.
Rookie center (2nd string) broke ankle against Steelers. Out for
the year.
I thought I heard the Pack already had four injured offensive
tackles.
This is very unsettling. I honestly thought the Pack had a shot
at the whole thing this year. Now, it appears their offensive
line will be total patchwork and I don't think any such offensive
line can win a SB.
Anyway, if anyone has any news on the Packers offensive line, I'd
really appreciate it.
Tony
|
9.4513 | Who's He??? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Aug 13 1996 16:46 | 6 |
| Mike,
Who is Eric Hill? The names sounds familar, but I don't know
him. What position?
Tony
|
9.4514 | In related news, a good day for my hometown Ford City PA | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Hardball, good ol' country | Mon Aug 19 1996 14:57 | 15 |
|
Gus Frerotte wins Redskins starting QB job from Shuler
Monday, August 19 1:05pm ET
In Gus they trust.
Gus Frerotte, who gets paid far less and was selected six rounds behind
Heath Shuler in the 1994 draft, today was named the starting
quarterback for the Washington Redskins.
The anticipated announcement was made by Washington head coach Norv
Turner at a morning news conference at Redskin Park. The Redskins host
the Philadelphia Eagles in their season opener on September 1st.
|
9.4515 | Did Miami trade Kirby | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys Champs Again | Mon Aug 19 1996 16:23 | 5 |
| Can anyone confirm for me that Miami traded Terry Kirby this weekend
to SF ????
Thanks,
Tom
|
9.4516 | what they said | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Aug 21 1996 13:53 | 8 |
| Tom,
According to the transctions of USA Today:
Miami Dolphins -- Traded running back Terry Kirby to the San Francisco
49ers for a conditional 1997 draft pick.
TTom
|
9.4517 | NFL roster cuts | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Aug 21 1996 13:53 | 185 |
|
NFL roster cuts
_________________________________________________________________
AFC
Baltimore: RB Ricky Powers; DT Chad Eaton.
_________________________________________________________________
Buffalo: QB Mike Maxwell; WRs Demeris Johnson and Damon Thomas; S Greg
Evans; TE Mike Titley; LBs Marc Lillibridge and Robert Deshote; DE
Harry Van Hofwegen; NT Tim Colston; G Matt Meservey; OL Dave Hack and
Mike Sheldon; LB Dan Brandenburg.
_________________________________________________________________
Cincinnati: DTs Keith Rucker and Todd Kelly; WRs Thomas Bailey and
Tyree Davis; LB Shawn Banks; TE Demetrius Davis; QB Damon Huard.
_________________________________________________________________
Denver: OT Leslie Ratliffe; QB T.J. Rubley; WRs Sanjay Beach and Larry
Wallace; FB Derrick Clark; CBs Toi Cook and Jamal Ellis; DE Larry
Jackson and Ricky Sutton; G Alai Kalaniuvalu; RB Mike Pringle; DL
Lance Teichelman; WR David Gamble; P Brian Gragert; C Keith Kartz; LBs
Arnold Ale and Ken Brown; DL Ken Talanoa; placed running back L.T.
Levine on the physically unable to perform list.
_________________________________________________________________
Jacksonville: WR Chris Doering and Tony Kimbrough; LB Mark Williams;
DT Ray Hall; QB Steve Taneyhill; RB Chris Parker; TE Craig Thompson;
OTs Jason Dukes and Patrick Walsh; DE Cornell Thomas; LBs Ed Brady,
Cedric Thornton and Mark Williams; and CBs Tommy Johnson and Kelly
Wiltshire. Also, placed LB Santo Stephens on injured reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
Kansas City: QB Bucky Richardson; K Roman Anderson; C Ben Lynch; DEs
Jason Simmons and Troy Wilson; DT Robert Davis; FB Derrick Ned; LBs
Alan Young, Nate Dingle and Don Davis; RBs Terry Richardson and Siran
Stacy; S John Anderson, Brandon Sanders and Charles Swann; TE Willy
Tate; WR Breyon Bradford, Michael Dritlein, Dietrich Jells and Sean
LaChapelle.
_________________________________________________________________
Miami: CBs Kirk Pointer and Dorian Brew; QB Dan McGwire; OGs Kevin
Brothen (knee) and Bert Weidner (ankle); OT Ethan Albright; WRs Kirby
Dar Dar, A.C. Tellison and Sir Mawn Wilson; S Walter Smith; DT Lamar
Mills; LB LaCurtis Jones; FB Lee McClinton; TE Dewayne Dotson; DT Ed
Hawthorne; placed defensive end Jeff Cross on the physically unable to
perform list; placed guards Kevin Brothen and Bert Weidner on injured
reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
New England: K Matt Bahr; OL John Elmore; TE Chris Griffin; DE Bryon
Thompson; WR Kevin Lee; DE Rich McKenzie; placed linebacker Bobby
Abrahms on injured reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
New York: KP Pat O'Neill; WRs Alan Allen, Elbert Ellis, Wayne Morris
and Darrick Owens; SS Brian Clarke and Chris Hayes; CB Melvin
Crawford; RBs Lou D'Agostino and Terrell Willis; LB Johnny Frost; OT
Melvin Hayes; DE Hugh Hunter; DT Eric Johnson; QB John Paci and Gs Tim
Simpson and Vernice Smith. Also, DE Brent Williams was removed from
the physically unable to perform list.
_________________________________________________________________
Oakland: WRs Philip Bobo and Kenyan Branscomb; QB Todd Studer; S Lamar
Lyons; CB John Morton; LB Scott Radecic; DE Malcolm Showell. Also,
placed on injured reserve G Rich Stephens (broken leg); LB Keith
Franklin (back); WR A.C. Caswell (foot/ankle); RB Kendall Bussey
(knee).
_________________________________________________________________
Pittsburgh: QB Spence Fischer; RBs LaMonte Coleman, Jermaine Johnson
and Jon Vaughn; WRs Chris George, Chris Jones, Jay Kearney and Damon
Mays; TEs Tracy Greene and A.J. Ofodile; OL Greg Black and Emerson
Martin; DL Lorenzo Green and Taase Faumui; DBs Barron Miles and
Cornell Parker; P Shayne Edge; P Rohn Stark and PK Joe Wood. Also,
signed OL Jim Sweeney; placed OL Lewis Tyre and DB Alvoid Mays on
reserved/left camp list; placed LB Patrick Scott on reserve/injured
list.
_________________________________________________________________
San Diego: T Jason Bartlett; G Ben Cavil; LB James Gillyard; QB Robert
Higgins; DT Steve Hoffmann; WR Dwight McKinzie; WR Ray Peterson; SS
Shawn Gayle.
_________________________________________________________________
Seattle: QB Jon Kitna; WR Grayson Shillingford, Manley Woods and WR
Larry Thompson; OT Mike Keim; SS Tony Covington; LB Willie Brown and
Henry Newby; DE Johnie Church; CB Sean Crocker; RB Jimmy Gary; DT
Kelvin Ingram; SS C.J. Richardson. Also, WR Eddie Goines was placed on
injured reserve and is out for season.
_________________________________________________________________
NFC
Arizona: RB Garrison Hearst; WR Fred Brock; QB Mark Butterfield; OL
Joe Carolo; DTs Clyde Simmons, Tommy Jeter and Alton Jones; CB Cedric
Davis; S Tony Jones; WR Kevin Knox; K Atle Larsen; G Ryan Leahy; RB
Clarence Matthews; OT Brandon Moore; P Scott Player; LB Nick Smith and
FB Willie Wright. DE Blaine Berger on injured reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
Atlanta: RB Lincoln Coleman; S George Teague; WRs Demetrius Allen,
Tryone Johnson and Derrell Mitchell, QBs Jim Ballard and Dan White; DE
Gary Bandy; G James Christiansen; T Robert Couch; DE Tommy Fagan; DTs
Jim Hanna and Mike Schlegel; P Greg Ivy; CBs Eric Jack and Akili
Johnson.
_________________________________________________________________
Carolina: WRs Ray Crittenden and Marcus Wall; LBs Jamal Fountaine,
John Walters and Phil Yeboah-Kodie; C Paul Greeley; G Sean Love; Ts
William Knight and Andrew Peterson; DBs Michael Senters and Butler
By'Not'e; S Johnnie Williams; FB Scott Greene; DT Jeff Zgonina; DE
Jeremy Nunley; TE Paul Burke; P Aaron Kanner; K David Lauder. Also,
placed RB Tony Smith on injured reserve and QB Jim Kubiak on military
reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
Chicago: CBs Jeremy Lincoln and Kenny Gales;; LBs Myron Baker and
Ahmani Johnson; P Kent Sullivan; TE Andre President; RB Brandon
Bennett; WRs Fabien Bownes, Don Blair and Shaston Coleman; FB Ed
Hobbs; S Jeff Horton and Clarence Sutton; G Seth Littleton and OT
Derrick Turner. Also, placed CB Dwayne Joseph on injured reserve and
out for season.
_________________________________________________________________
Dallas: TE Rickey Brady, DBs Barry Dillard, Charles Franks and Buster
Owens; FB Ryan Wood, LBs Errick Herrin and Kerry Mock; C Kevin Dogins;
and DL Mike Harrison, Gabriel Oladipo and Haywood Simmons.
_________________________________________________________________
Green Bay: OT Joe Staysniak; DB Reggie Holt; placed offensive tackle
Ken Ruettgers on the reserve/physically unable to perform list; placed
running back James Bostic on injured reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
Minnesota: K Lin Elliott; LB Tuineau Alipate; RB Bobby Phillips; S
Shelly Hammonds; LB Earl Mackey; WR Moses Ware; DT Jose White; WR Tony
Bland and Cedric Tillman; G Orlando Bobo; OT Matt Reem and CBs Michael
Robinson and Jamie Coleman.
_________________________________________________________________
New York: QB Tommy Maddox; WRs Gary Harrell and Kevin Alexander; DTs
Stacey Dillard and Todd Yeaman; P Daron Alcorn; OT Ken Dammann; G
Chris Kennedy; C Jason Stinson; LB Jeff Rodgers; S Mark Washington; FB
Geof Grenier; CB Tim Sensley; placed defensive lineman Ramon Okili on
injured reserve with a wrist injury.
_________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia: TE Tony Johnson; DE Sebastian Barrie; FB Chris
Buckhalter; LBs Joe Cummings and Steve White; CBs Frederick Ford,
Jerome Henderson and Tristan Moss; Ts Steve Wallace and Chris
Oltmanns; WRs Khevin Pratt, Phillip Riley and Cedric Zachery; OL Joe
Rudolph.
_________________________________________________________________
St. Louis: OL Lance Zeno, John Earle and Keith Loneker; DBs Demetrice
Martin and John Reece; LBs Ashley Sheppard and Ed Stewart; RB Marcus
Holliday; DL Andre Davis and Antonio Armstrong.
_________________________________________________________________
San Francisco: QB Gino Torretta; RB Johnny Johnson; DEs Oliver
Barnett, Herb Coleman and James Guarnera; CBs Eric Carter and Anthony
Prior; LB Tom Cavallo; WRs Chris Thomas and Mark Harris; S Mike Salmon
and Pat McGuirk; RBs Brian O'Neal, Stephen Pitts and Reynard
Rutherford; DT Albert Reese; T Andrew Moore; TE Luther Morris; placed
tight end Adrian Cooper and fullback William Floyd on the
reserve/physically unable to perform list;
_________________________________________________________________
Tampa Bay: LB Keith Goganious; P Robbie Colley; WRs Terrence Davis and
Jermaine Holmes; DE Emil Ekiyor; RB Leonard Green; CBs George Harris
and Reggie Rusk; QB Kelly Holcomb; TE Brian Jones; OTs Darryl Moore
and Peter Pierson, FB Robert Staten and DT Ben Williams. Also, placed
S John Booty, WR Horace Copeland and DE Keith Powe on injured reserve.
They will miss the entire 1996 season; CB Jerry Wilson.
_________________________________________________________________
Washington: Veteran C John Gesek and Christopher Sedoris; RB Reggie
Brooks; RB Larry Jones; WR Tydus Winans; DT Leonard Renfro; LB Jeremy
Asher; WR Alfonzo Browning; DT Ervin Collier; CB Ramon George; QB Mark
Hartsell; CB Allen Johnson; LB Jim Kitts; T Marc Lamb; DE Don
Reynolds; TE Ca'Dell Seagraves; WR Charlie Simmons; T Matt Storm; T
Keith Wagner; WR Michael Watkins.
|
9.4518 | | STRATA::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys Champs Again | Wed Aug 21 1996 16:01 | 1 |
| thanks........
|
9.4519 | Looking for SI Pro Football Edition to Borrow | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Aug 28 1996 09:22 | 7 |
| Does anyone have the SI pro football edition? I hear they had
an article on the Packers that I'd love to have a chance to
read. Anyone in the Hudson facility have it that can lend it?
Kevin, MikeC, Jimbo???
Tony
|
9.4520 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Wed Aug 28 1996 11:20 | 5 |
| I haven't gotten it in the mail yet, but there is
an "Why Everyone Should Root for the Packers" article
on the web - http://pathfinder.com - follow the SI links.
Mike
|
9.4521 | up and coming | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Aug 28 1996 11:23 | 14 |
| It seems like a lot of people are jumping on the Packer bandwagon.
This isn't directed to the fans in SPROTS as much as toward the sprots
talk shows and the like.
Green Bay seems to have become somewhat of the media darling. Maybe it
has something to do with a lot of people wanting someone aside from San
Fran or Dallas to win it.
In any case, you hear a lot of predictions of them in the SuperBowl
beating a variety of hopefuls from the AFC like Miami, New England,
and Kansas City.
TTom
|
9.4522 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Wed Aug 28 1996 12:19 | 4 |
| Ttom, you should see the excitement around here because of the
exhibition season and several rookies looking good. Some Goldberg guy,
though has the Pats at the bottom of this nfl predictions, one up from
the Jets.
|
9.4523 | homer? | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Aug 28 1996 12:52 | 8 |
| re: Goldberg
Aint that the guy on ESPN who's almost a homer for the Fins?
All I can say is good luck to all, including myself, cause I'm gonna need
it the firsted couple of weeks.
TTom
|
9.4524 | Have It | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Aug 28 1996 16:38 | 7 |
| re: .4520
Mike,
Got it! Thanks! (great article)
Tony
|
9.4525 | Time for a real mans sport!!! | MFGFIN::JACKSON | Onlysayingwhatsonmymind | Fri Aug 30 1996 01:55 | 35 |
| Well I guess it prediction time for the playoff race and SB, even
though I won't be here went its all over;-(
AFC: NFC:
east: Bills east: cowgirls
Colts (wildcard) Eagles (wildcard)
central: sqeelers central: Packers
Lions (wildcard)
west: Chiefs west: 49'rs
Broncos (wildcard) Falcons (wildcard)
Chargers (wildcard)
AFC chump: Bills (ouch) NFC chump: Packers
SB champ: Packers
The AFC will play well again in the SB, but will still come up
just short. Next year the AFC will triumph in the SB, and it will be
my mighty Broncos! (stop laughing) They are 1 excellent CB and DL
away if they keep the nuclius that they have now.
The recent dominant teams won't have the depth that they used to do
to FA. Thats evident this year, and will be more so next year.
LET THE GAMES BEGIN!
Tim
|
9.4526 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Aug 30 1996 08:06 | 15 |
|
AFC NFC
Colts Cowboys
Steelers Packers
Seattle Niners
Patsies Lions
Cinncy Falcons
KC Bears
Steelers slap Niners in bowl
|
9.4527 | | SUBPAC::SKALSKI | A reclined state of mind | Fri Aug 30 1996 10:00 | 8 |
|
To whom do we send the KOH picks for thised week?
Shark
|
9.4528 | | SHARE::DERRY | Color me impressed... | Fri Aug 30 1996 10:21 | 1 |
9.4529 | take no chances | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Aug 30 1996 10:33 | 18 |
| hey I aint never seen a prediction I aint liked:
AFC-East Bills
AFC-Central Steelhaids
AFC-West Kansas City
AFC-WCs New England, Miami, Seattle
NFC-East Cowboys
NFC-Central Packers
NFC-West Niners
NFC-WCs Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta
AFC-Champs Chiefs
NFC-Champs Boys
SB-Champs Boys (again)
TTom
|
9.4530 | Don't have really strong feelings about any of these picks | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Zydeco! | Fri Aug 30 1996 12:26 | 22 |
| As always, off the top of my haid:
AFC East - New England/Buffalo
AFC Central - Houston
AFC West - San Diego
Wildcards - NE/Buf; Indy; Pittsburgh
NFC East - Dallas
NFC Central - Tampa Bay
NFC West - San Francisco
Wildcards - Atlanta, Green Bay, Minnesota
AFC Champ - Buffalo
NFC Champ - San Francisco
SB Champs - San Francisco
NAZZ
|
9.4531 | As I said, who has a real clue | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Fri Aug 30 1996 12:30 | 8 |
| Pats Dallas
Houston G.Bay
KC SF
Seattle Detroit
Miami Atlanta
Jets Carolina
|
9.4532 | Pack is Back | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Fri Aug 30 1996 12:51 | 14 |
| AFC-East Bills
AFC-Central Steelers
AFC-West Oakland
AFC-WCs New England, Miami
NFC-East Philadelphia
NFC-Central Packers
NFC-West Niners
NFC-WCs Dallas, Detroit
AFC-Champs Steelers
NFC-Champs Packers
SB-Champs Packers
|
9.4533 | I'll get in this one! | SMARTT::SALMON | | Fri Aug 30 1996 13:23 | 16 |
| AFC East Indy
Central Steelers
West Denver
WCs New England, Chieffs
NFC East Dallas
Central Packers
West 49'ers
WCs Detroit, Bears
AFC Champs Denver
NFC Champs 49'ers
SB-Champs 49'ers
|
9.4534 | Replay of Superbowl 1 would be cool | MUTEX::LIU | | Fri Aug 30 1996 16:03 | 21 |
|
NFC East: Dallas
NFC Central: Green Bay
NFC West: San Francisco
NFC Wildcards: Chicago, Philadelphia, Carolina
NFC Champ: Green Bay
AFC East: Buffalo
AFC Central: Pittsburgh
AFC West: Kansas City
AFC Wildcards: New England, Denver, Cincinnati
AFC Champ: Kansas City
Super Bowl Champ: Green Bay
S.F. goes down on injuries
G.B., K.C. home field advantage
Dallas can't hack Lambeau field in January
Parcells goes to TV booth after season
|
9.4535 | PITTSBURGH 31 GREEN BAY 17 | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Fri Aug 30 1996 22:47 | 32 |
|
AFC CENTRAL: PITTSBURGH
AFC EAST: NEW ENGLAND
AFC WEST: SEATTLE
AFC WILDCARDS: CINCINATTI, MIAMI, & KANSAS CITY
*AFC CHAMPION*: PITTSBURGH
NFC CENTRAL: GREEN BAY
NFC EAST: DALLAS
NFC WEST: SAN FRANCISCO
NFC WILDCARDS: DETROIT, PHILADELPHIA, ATLANTA
*NFC CHAMPION*: GREEN BAY
***SUPER BOWL CHAMPION***
* ------------------- *
* *
* PITTSBURGH STEELERS *
* *
*************************
D.J.
|
9.4536 | Pack the Pick and Pick the Pack | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Sun Sep 01 1996 11:15 | 43 |
| NFC
East: Cowboys
Central: Packers
West: 49'ers
Lions
Redskins
Falcons
Redskins over Falcons
Cowboys over Lions
49'ers over Cowboys (9'ers are now spent)
Packers over Redskins
Packers over 49'ers IN LAMBEAU FIELD
AFC
East: Bills
Central: Steelers
West: Chiefs
Patriots
Bengals
Broncos
Patriots over Bengals
Steelers over Broncos
Chiefs over Steelers
Patriots over Bills
Chiefs over Patriots
SUPER BOWL
PACKERS OVER CHIEFS (IN LAMBEAU FIELD!!!!!)
All right, in New Orleans or wherever.
|
9.4537 | Hmmmmm | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Sep 03 1996 09:54 | 1 |
| Redskins were a weird hunch!
|
9.4538 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Dan Reeves - one bad stud | Tue Sep 03 1996 10:39 | 6 |
| I noticed that more than one team has taken to the Jerry Jones style of
outfitting their teams. Raiders got the swoosh the Giants got whatever
that Rebook thing is supposed to be. Raiders I can understand cause Al's
always been a renegade but the Jints? Must be the Tesch influence......
mc
|
9.4539 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Sep 03 1996 10:52 | 10 |
| >
>I noticed that more than one team has taken to the Jerry Jones style of
>outfitting their teams. Raiders got the swoosh the Giants got whatever
>that Rebook thing is supposed to be. Raiders I can understand cause Al's
>always been a renegade but the Jints? Must be the Tesch influence......
Isn't that the manufacturer of the uniforms? Or does Apex still make the
Giants unis?
Or am I totally misunderstanding what you're talking about?
|
9.4540 | | TAYTER::BROOKS | | Thu Sep 05 1996 08:34 | 4 |
| Anyone have a copy of this weeks injury report ? Or can someone point
me in the direction of where I can pull one from on the WEB ? Thanks
in advance...
|
9.4541 | not yet | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Sep 05 1996 10:42 | 9 |
| MaB,
The IR doesn't come out til late tonight. It'll be on the USA Today web
or paper or the Sportcenter web tomorrow morning.
When there's a Thursday night game, those teams release there IR
Wedndesday night.
TTom
|
9.4542 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Thu Sep 05 1996 11:03 | 7 |
| Check out the NFL site - www.nfl.com.
Looks like they have a report for week 2.
http://www.nfl.com/news/injury/index.html
Mike
|
9.4543 | Only an Italian can tell this joke | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Zydeco! | Thu Sep 05 1996 11:11 | 9 |
| My brother told me this joke he heard on WEEI:
How do you pronounce Bledsoe in Italian??????
Testaverde!
NAZZ
|
9.4544 | good pointer | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Sep 05 1996 11:12 | 8 |
| Thanks for the pointer, Mike.
FWIW, this is the Wednesday report. IRs are updated Wednesday and Friday
according to this page. Some of these have already changed. For instance,
Emmitt Smith is listed at Doubtful while the team has upgraded him to
Questionable.
TTom
|
9.4545 | NFL power ratings | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Sep 06 1996 15:51 | 52 |
|
The mighty fall hard: Cowboys drop to No. 13
By Herman Matthews
Scripps Howard News Service
_________________________________________________________________
The Dallas Cowboys toppled from No. 1 to No. 13 in the Scripps Howard
pro football computer power ratings on the heels of their 22-6 pasting
Monday night in Chicago.
The Green Bay Packers, who used four touchdown passes from '95 NFL MVP
Brett Favre to rout the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 34-3 in their season
open, have taken over the top spot.
Here are the power rankings after Week 1. To determine the projected
margin for Week 2 games, compare the ratings of the rival teams and
allow four points for typical home-field advantage.
Green Bay 60.6
San Francisco 58.3
Chicago 58.2
San Diego 55.8
Kansas City 54.9
Carolina 54.2
Denver 53.5
Philadelphia 53.0
Jacksonville 53.0
Miami 52.5
Minnesota 51.8
Houston 51.4
Dallas 51.4
Buffalo 51.3
Indianapolis 50.9
St. Louis 50.6
Detroit 49.7
Pittsburgh 49.0
Baltimore 48.3
Washington 48.2
Oakland 47.3
Seattle 45.8
Cincinnati 45.6
Arizona 45.3
New Orleans 45.1
N.Y. Giants 44.6
Atlanta 44.5
Tampa Bay 43.3
New England 42.6
N.Y. Jets 38.7
Herman Matthews is chairman of the math and natural sciences
department at Lincoln Memorial University in Harrogate, Tenn.
|
9.4546 | ;^) | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Fri Sep 06 1996 17:11 | 8 |
| > N.Y. Jets 38.7
Wow, that's pretty hard to believe for a team who has as
qb a stud who single-handedly took the Steelers to SBXXX.
(only to be forced by the head coach to through ints.)
billl
|
9.4547 | Complete text of Grogan at the Helm avail. c author | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Fri Sep 06 1996 17:39 | 26 |
| Never has one game played in the nfl been considered so definitive to a
season as this year. O'Donnell needs to be rated after 5-7 games not
after 1.
Now many would still rate Cowher ahead of Raymond Berry but on December
23rd, 1986 when the Patriots fell behind at the Orange Bowl,with not
only the conference but their wildcard hopes pinned on the final game,
In a bar in Cinninatti a smile graced Boomer's lip.
"Playoffs here we come, K.C." he had the brass to quip.
Berry didn't panic like Cowher. He ran the ball despite his misgivings
of the line.
All depended upon the line, that much detested crew:
Holloway, Wooten, Fairchild, Brock and Haley too.
Berry allowed Grogan to bide his time unlike Cowher's force feeding pass,
pass, pass to O'Donnell.
And when the Dolphin Defense drew in to shut the door,
Steve caught Thompson napping and Stanley had the score.
Berry's problem was that even having the steely, ageless veteran Grogan
he put Eason back in for the playoff game just like Cowher pushing
O'Donnell into free agency to cover his ineptitude in the SuperBowl.
|
9.4548 | | TAYTER::BROOKS | | Mon Sep 09 1996 12:27 | 4 |
| Im not sure how that rating is created and why but in terms of betting
the bottom 10 teams on that list all lost (Not sure if the all covered
there spreads but they lost there games).
|
9.4549 | Go Pack! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Sep 10 1996 13:41 | 4 |
| Packers looked awfully solid last night.
They have a chance for all the marbles!
Tony
|
9.4550 | | TAYTER::BROOKS | | Tue Sep 10 1996 13:58 | 7 |
| Seen the Best NFL commercial in a long time...
Basically has 2 Clevelander's sitting in Cleveland Stadium bragging
about the 2 great 50yrd line tickets they got for the Browns Game :-)
Commercials ends with one saying to the other... Must be a 4 oclock
game ..
|
9.4551 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Sep 10 1996 14:07 | 8 |
| Went to bed when it was 37-7 last night. Final score was 39-13.
Obviously the Pack registered a safety, but how'd Philly get their 6?
TD no conversion, or two FGs?
'Saw
|
9.4552 | safety | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Tue Sep 10 1996 14:08 | 7 |
| Sack by Santana Dotson for the safety and 2 points. Saw that on
Sportcenter.
Have no clue about the other scoring. I was unconscious long afore this
one ended.
TTom
|
9.4553 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Violently apathetic | Tue Sep 10 1996 15:59 | 10 |
|
Early on it looked like it might be game when Philly
held Green Bay to a fg after a tough turnover. But things
started to snow ball on Philly and before you know it
they were down 20-0 and I was shutting off the tv and
cracking open a book. Yeah, Green Bay looked good but
not invincible. Favre was off early and as was mentioned
Philly shut 'em down early. Cut out the turnovers and it
might have been a game though Peete looked fairly ineffect-
ual. Looks like a wide open field for the title this year.
|
9.4554 | Comments | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Sep 10 1996 16:23 | 12 |
| Philly scored a TD with ~10 seconds left. They went for 2.
The Pack ran the ball extremely well in the 2nd half. Several
runs of 5 yards or more. Bennett and Henderson looked good
rushing.
Announcers were saying it easily could have been low 50's
had it not been for a couple drops and a botched snap from
the 3 yard line for a FG. (GB was just running the ball, not
trying to strike the endzone.)
Tony
|
9.4555 | sagarin ratings | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Sep 11 1996 13:12 | 107 |
| Jeff Sagarin's power ratings
_________________________________________________________________
Through games of Monday, Sept. 9
HOME ADVANTAGE= 2.15 RATING W L T SCHEDULE
1 San Francisco 49ers = 30.77 2 0 0 14.52
2 Dallas Cowboys = 29.71 1 1 0 20.22
3 Green Bay Packers = 28.38 2 0 0 17.49
4 Kansas City Chiefs = 25.46 2 0 0 19.38
5 Miami Dolphins = 23.92 2 0 0 15.06
6 San Diego Chargers = 23.26 2 0 0 12.97
7 Minnesota Vikings = 23.21 2 0 0 19.46
8 Pittsburgh Steelers = 22.96 1 1 0 16.02
9 Denver Broncos = 22.52 2 0 0 13.77
10 Detroit Lions = 22.36 1 1 0 18.45
11 Chicago Bears = 22.33 1 1 0 23.96
12 Buffalo Bills = 22.29 2 0 0 17.01
13 Philadelphia Eagles = 21.29 1 1 0 25.44
14 Indianapolis Colts = 20.08 2 0 0 12.82
15 Oakland Raiders = 19.72 0 2 0 23.99
16 Houston Oilers = 19.05 1 1 0 19.63
17 Carolina Panthers = 18.96 2 0 0 17.27
18 Baltimore Ravens = 18.23 1 1 0 21.34
19 Washington Redskins = 18.21 1 1 0 19.66
20 New York Giants = 18.11 0 2 0 26.00
21 New Orleans Saints = 17.99 0 2 0 24.87
22 Atlanta Falcons = 16.55 0 2 0 21.09
23 Seattle Seahawks = 16.08 0 2 0 22.89
24 New England Patriots = 15.92 0 2 0 25.25
25 St. Louis Rams = 15.35 1 1 0 22.46
26 Arizona Cardinals = 14.19 0 2 0 22.00
27 Cincinnati Bengals = 14.15 0 2 0 21.45
28 Jacksonville Jaguars = 13.81 1 1 0 18.86
29 Tampa Bay Buccaneers = 13.68 0 2 0 25.37
30 New York Jets = 11.45 0 2 0 21.30
Divisional rankings
DIVISION RATING TEAMS
1 (NFC CENTRAL) = 21.99 5
2 (AFC WEST) = 21.41 5
3 (NFC EAST) = 20.30 5
4 (NFC WEST) = 19.93 5
5 (AFC EAST) = 18.73 5
6 (AFC CENTRAL) = 17.64 5
Rankings by division
NFC East
Rating: 20.30
HOME ADVANTAGE= 2.15 RATING W L T SCHEDULE
2 Dallas Cowboys = 29.71 1 1 0 20.22
13 Philadelphia Eagles = 21.29 1 1 0 25.44
19 Washington Redskins = 18.21 1 1 0 19.66
20 New York Giants = 18.11 0 2 0 26.00
26 Arizona Cardinals = 14.19 0 2 0 22.00
NFC Central
Rating: 21.99
HOME ADVANTAGE= 2.15 RATING W L T SCHEDULE
3 Green Bay Packers = 28.38 2 0 0 17.49
7 Minnesota Vikings = 23.21 2 0 0 19.46
10 Detroit Lions = 22.36 1 1 0 18.45
11 Chicago Bears = 22.33 1 1 0 23.96
29 Tampa Bay Buccaneers = 13.68 0 2 0 25.37
NFC West
Rating: 19.93
HOME ADVANTAGE= 2.15 RATING W L T SCHEDULE
1 San Francisco 49ers = 30.77 2 0 0 14.52
17 Carolina Panthers = 18.96 2 0 0 17.27
21 New Orleans Saints = 17.99 0 2 0 24.87
22 Atlanta Falcons = 16.55 0 2 0 21.09
25 St. Louis Rams = 15.35 1 1 0 22.46
AFC East
Rating: 18.73
HOME ADVANTAGE= 2.15 RATING W L T SCHEDULE
5 Miami Dolphins = 23.92 2 0 0 15.06
12 Buffalo Bills = 22.29 2 0 0 17.01
14 Indianapolis Colts = 20.08 2 0 0 12.82
24 New England Patriots = 15.92 0 2 0 25.25
30 New York Jets = 11.45 0 2 0 21.30
AFC Central
Rating: 17.64
HOME ADVANTAGE= 2.15 RATING W L T SCHEDULE
8 Pittsburgh Steelers = 22.96 1 1 0 16.02
16 Houston Oilers = 19.05 1 1 0 19.63
18 Baltimore Ravens = 18.23 1 1 0 21.34
27 Cincinnati Bengals = 14.15 0 2 0 21.45
28 Jacksonville Jaguars = 13.81 1 1 0 18.86
AFC West
Rating: 21.41
HOME ADVANTAGE= 2.15 RATING W L T SCHEDULE
4 Kansas City Chiefs = 25.46 2 0 0 19.38
6 San Diego Chargers = 23.26 2 0 0 12.97
9 Denver Broncos = 22.52 2 0 0 13.77
15 Oakland Raiders = 19.72 0 2 0 23.99
23 Seattle Seahawks = 16.08 0 2 0 22.89
|
9.4556 | and if'n you din't like those, ... | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Wed Sep 11 1996 13:48 | 51 |
| ESPNET SportsZone | NFL
The Zone's NFL power rankings
ESPNET SportsZone power rankings are calculated using several factors,
including points scored and allowed, yardage gained and allowed,
turnovers, points scored per 100 yards gained, and winning percentage.
An average team is rated at 100 points. The difference between any two
power rankings corresponds to the expected point difference if the two
teams were to play. The power value is based on all games played this
season.
Data compiled by Matt Lombardi at MicroBrothers Software. Lombardi
will also be providing power rankings for college football and the
NBA.
For more information, see the MicroBrothers Software web site at
www.microbro.com.
Rank Team Power
1. Green Bay Packers 113.25
2. San Francisco 49ers 112.68
3. Miami Dolphins 110.90
4. Denver Broncos 110.05
5. San Diego Chargers 109.80
6. Buffalo Bills 107.88
7. Indianapolis Colts 107.28
8. Carolina Panthers 106.65
9. Kansas City Chiefs 106.53
10. Minnesota Vikings 106.38
11. Dallas Cowboys 104.80
12. Houston Oilers 104.15
13. Chicago Bears 103.93
14. Jacksonville Jaguars 103.05
15. Detroit Lions 102.98
16. Pittsburgh Steelers 102.78
17. Washington Redskins 101.03
18. Baltimore Ravens 100.73
19. Philadelphia Eagles 98.97
20. St. Louis Rams 98.38
21. New Orleans Saints 97.05
22. Oakland Raiders 95.85
23. New England Patriots 95.83
24. Atlanta Falcons 95.38
25. Cincinnati Bengals 95.22
26. Arizona Cardinals 94.25
27. Seattle Seahawks 93.68
28. New York Jets 93.68
29. New York Giants 93.10
30. Tampa Bay Buccaneers 92.08
|
9.4557 | | NQOS01::nqsrv240.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Wed Sep 11 1996 18:15 | 5 |
| Damn, I keep hopin to see my two favorites, the Giants and Cards at the bottom
of one of these lists so I'll get to see a game that means something when they
meet here in Tempe.
brews
|
9.4558 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Sep 12 1996 08:57 | 2 |
| Cards ain't going to be at the bottom of ANY list now that they have that
SUPERSTAR Kent Graham at the helm.....heheheheheheheheh
|
9.4559 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Thu Sep 12 1996 09:47 | 4 |
|
Graham > Brown..........
;^(
|
9.4560 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Sep 12 1996 09:52 | 8 |
| >
>
> Graham > Brown..........
>
>;^(
Oh, no doubt. *BUT* Graham still sucks. 8^)
|
9.4561 | | TRIBE::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Thu Sep 12 1996 10:19 | 9 |
|
> Graham > Brown..........
Saw this; only thought was "Otto Graham better than Jim Brown?
Hmmm..."
I miss football.
Joe
|
9.4562 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Thu Sep 12 1996 11:39 | 6 |
| |Cards ain't going to be at the bottom of ANY list now that they have that
|SUPERSTAR Kent Graham at the helm.....heheheheheheheheh
the sad fact is he has outplayed Boomer thus far.
Mike (who got to meet Kent's family on Sunday night)
|
9.4563 | | NQOS01::nqsrv142.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Thu Sep 12 1996 13:33 | 3 |
| Yeah, but he's yet to play against any 1st team defense.
boC
|
9.4564 | must be true | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Thu Sep 12 1996 16:04 | 16 |
| Team denies report that Colts are headed to Cleveland
INDIANAPOLIS - A broadcast report that the Indianapolis Colts might be
considering a move to Cleveland was strongly denied Wednesday by Jim
Irsay, the son of owner Robert Irsay and the team's senior executive.
''It's not true. We're 2-0. We're trying to create something special
here in Indianapolis. It's just unnecessary,'' he said of the ESPN
report that said there was a possibility the Colts would move to
Cleveland and allow the Baltimore Ravens to reclaim the nickname
''Colts.'' Irsay said he had no idea where the report originated.
''We're working hard to get season tickets up. We have a great team
here, and I'm very happy to be in Indianapolis,'' he stressed. Season
ticket sales have dropped significantly since 1984, when the franchise
arrived from Baltimore. Indianapolis drew 481,305 fans to its eight
home games that year and have never matched the figure.
|
9.4565 | Alignment | MUTEX::LIU | Faan-Hoan | Thu Sep 12 1996 17:21 | 12 |
|
What would be the effect of moving Indianapolis, not geographically but
divisionally, to the AFC Central (let 'em keep the horseshoe) and switching
Baltimore to the AFC East? Geographic alignment would be better.
And why is it called the NFC West if San Fran is the only team west of the
Mississippi? (vs. Atlanta, New Orleans, Carolina, St. Louis)
-fhl
P.S. I don't like the Raven name or logo, but I can hear sound bites:
Raven Mad, Raven Lunatic, Ravenous, etc.
|
9.4566 | Peering into the future .... | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Two months to Maui - Go UMass! | Thu Sep 12 1996 17:35 | 4 |
| Great denial by young Irsay. I can see those moving vans circling the
Hoosier dome about midnight on March 24, 1997.
NAZZ
|
9.4567 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Thu Sep 12 1996 17:50 | 2 |
|
they're not using vans this time, the stuff is going to be airlifted.
|
9.4568 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Sep 13 1996 09:46 | 9 |
9.4569 | maybe | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Sep 13 1996 10:42 | 23 |
9.4570 | everything else is artificial | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Sep 13 1996 10:54 | 8 |
9.4571 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:02 | 9 |
9.4572 | Painters pay well | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:03 | 7 |
9.4573 | Probably not the Bucs in Cleveland | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Two months to Maui - Go UMass! | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:25 | 4 |
9.4574 | | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | Central Division Champs=Indians | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:32 | 3 |
9.4575 | NFL Conference history from 1960 on.... | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:33 | 187 |
9.4576 | switcherooney | HBAHBA::HAAS | more madness, less horror | Fri Sep 13 1996 11:47 | 14 |
9.4577 | | NQOS01::nqsrv220.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Fri Sep 13 1996 13:13 | 11 |
9.4578 | I say he doesn't make it to the end-of-season | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 13 1996 14:00 | 13 |
9.4579 | | 16.67.96.117::dfaust | Dennis Faust | Fri Sep 13 1996 14:03 | 7 |
9.4580 | Your team's gone, Hal... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 13 1996 14:03 | 9 |
9.4581 | Who'd A Thought? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Sep 23 1996 09:34 | 6 |
9.4582 | and tip their hand? | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Mon Sep 23 1996 09:58 | 0 |
9.4583 | Jeff george | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Post-Olympics blues | Mon Sep 23 1996 17:59 | 18 |
9.4584 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Mon Sep 23 1996 18:09 | 9 |
9.4585 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D Tools Support | Mon Sep 23 1996 18:53 | 2 |
9.4586 | | SALEM::DODA | Searching for the next distraction | Tue Sep 24 1996 10:38 | 7 |
9.4587 | What of Jones??? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Sep 24 1996 11:22 | 9 |
9.4588 | Take June Jones, please! | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Post-Olympics blues | Tue Sep 24 1996 14:36 | 13 |
9.4589 | parity? | MUTEX::LIU | Faan-Hoan | Tue Sep 24 1996 16:08 | 6 |
9.4590 | GO PACK!!! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Sep 24 1996 18:46 | 5 |
9.4591 | Seriously | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Sep 24 1996 18:47 | 7 |
9.4592 | | tun-4.imc.das.dec.com::dfaust | Dennis Faust | Tue Sep 24 1996 19:45 | 17 |
9.4593 | like I haven't had enough already | SMART2::CHILDS | | Wed Sep 25 1996 08:30 | 9 |
9.4594 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Sep 25 1996 10:24 | 18 |
9.4595 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 26 1996 09:36 | 20 |
9.4596 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Sep 26 1996 11:45 | 13 |
9.4597 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Thu Sep 26 1996 13:05 | 14 |
9.4598 | and on it goes... | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Thu Sep 26 1996 17:08 | 13 |
9.4599 | I think I know the answer | BSS::MENDEZ | | Fri Sep 27 1996 11:28 | 3 |
9.4600 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Sep 27 1996 11:28 | 1 |
9.4601 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Sep 27 1996 11:28 | 12 |
9.4602 | Les Steckle | SALEM::DODA | Out of my mind, back in 5 minutes | Fri Sep 27 1996 11:39 | 0 |
9.4603 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | | Fri Sep 27 1996 13:02 | 7 |
9.4604 | should read collie boy | BSS::MENDEZ | | Fri Sep 27 1996 13:07 | 2 |
9.4605 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Smoke on the Water | Fri Sep 27 1996 13:13 | 1 |
9.4606 | One level up in Dante's Inferno.... | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Sep 27 1996 13:26 | 14 |
9.4607 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Fri Sep 27 1996 15:40 | 15 |
9.4608 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 27 1996 15:47 | 13 |
9.4609 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Fri Sep 27 1996 15:46 | 1 |
9.4610 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 27 1996 15:56 | 8 |
9.4611 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Sep 27 1996 16:07 | 10 |
9.4612 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Fri Sep 27 1996 16:33 | 1 |
9.4613 | | MKOTS3::tcc122.mko.dec.com::long | Beat em Bucs | Fri Sep 27 1996 16:40 | 7 |
9.4614 | | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Sep 30 1996 07:43 | 3 |
9.4615 | GO PACK!!! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Sep 30 1996 09:31 | 3 |
9.4616 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Sep 30 1996 09:41 | 10 |
9.4617 | 'Course Moon choked, as usual-- we'll give him a bit part | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Sep 30 1996 09:56 | 9 |
9.4618 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Sep 30 1996 10:37 | 17 |
9.4619 | Falcons trade? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Bravos all the way! | Tue Oct 01 1996 12:58 | 8 |
9.4620 | | SALEM::DODA | Out of my mind, back in 5 minutes | Tue Oct 01 1996 13:08 | 6 |
9.4621 | Sheesh... | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Bravos all the way! | Tue Oct 01 1996 14:25 | 7 |
9.4622 | maybe..maybe not | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:46 | 7 |
9.4623 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D Tools Support | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:53 | 4 |
9.4624 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Tue Oct 01 1996 15:57 | 6 |
9.4625 | | SALEM::DODA | Out of my mind, back in 5 minutes | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:11 | 2 |
9.4626 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Tastes like chicken | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:14 | 2 |
9.4627 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Tue Oct 01 1996 16:35 | 4 |
9.4628 | George says no | HBAHBA::HAAS | Not A Sane Chap Anywhere 'Round | Wed Oct 09 1996 12:27 | 14 |
9.4629 | Good riddance, take June with you! | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Bravos all the way! | Wed Oct 09 1996 13:46 | 15 |
9.4630 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Oct 09 1996 13:52 | 1 |
9.4631 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Oct 09 1996 14:02 | 12 |
9.4632 | | NQOS01::nqsrv107.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | | Wed Oct 09 1996 14:50 | 8 |
9.4633 | | SALEM::DODA | Frustrated Incorporated | Mon Oct 21 1996 12:05 | 5 |
9.4634 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Bravos all the way! | Mon Oct 21 1996 12:28 | 3 |
9.4635 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Oct 21 1996 12:40 | 6 |
9.4636 | George Waived | HBAHBA::HAAS | Not A Sane Chap Anywhere 'Round | Wed Oct 23 1996 15:06 | 10 |
9.4637 | Sell the team, please! | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Bravos all the way! | Wed Oct 23 1996 15:39 | 16 |
9.4638 | more | HBAHBA::HAAS | Not A Sane Chap Anywhere 'Round | Wed Oct 23 1996 15:52 | 5 |
9.4639 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Wed Oct 23 1996 15:55 | 2 |
9.4640 | I'll bet no team bites | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Wed Oct 23 1996 17:05 | 7 |
9.4641 | Possible Explanation | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Oct 23 1996 17:48 | 2 |
9.4642 | possible | HBAHBA::HAAS | Not A Sane Chap Anywhere 'Round | Wed Oct 23 1996 17:56 | 13 |
9.4643 | | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Bravos all the way! | Wed Oct 23 1996 18:16 | 6 |
9.4644 | | AWECIM::RUSSO | claimin! | Wed Oct 23 1996 19:00 | 27 |
9.4645 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | maranatha! | Wed Oct 23 1996 19:41 | 2 |
9.4646 | Raiders sip, Chappy... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Burn Tempe to the Ground | Tue Nov 05 1996 10:20 | 12 |
9.4647 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Nov 05 1996 11:41 | 15 |
9.4648 | | BSS::BRUNO | It's finally over! | Tue Nov 05 1996 13:36 | 5 |
9.4649 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Tue Nov 05 1996 15:03 | 4 |
9.4650 | colorado native = non bronco fan | CSC32::J_HILL | | Tue Nov 05 1996 15:03 | 4 |
9.4651 | | BSS::BRUNO | It's finally over! | Tue Nov 05 1996 15:42 | 6 |
9.4652 | nyuk, nyuk | BRAT::taydhcp-23-144-238.tay.dec.com::LongW | taxation without representation | Tue Nov 05 1996 16:17 | 6 |
9.4653 | Can't lose with this strategy! | BSS::BRUNO | It's finally over! | Tue Nov 05 1996 20:38 | 7 |
9.4654 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Nov 06 1996 09:04 | 13 |
9.4655 | | BSS::BRUNO | It's finally over! | Wed Nov 06 1996 09:14 | 2 |
9.4656 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Tastes like chicken. | Wed Nov 06 1996 09:28 | 5 |
9.4657 | | BSS::BRUNO | It's finally over! | Wed Nov 06 1996 11:33 | 4 |
9.4658 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Tue Nov 12 1996 09:05 | 7 |
9.4659 | | SALEM::DODA | Visibly shaken, not stirred | Tue Nov 12 1996 09:20 | 1 |
9.4660 | | ILBBAK::SILVESTRI | Penuts Gang turns 10 in 1997! | Tue Nov 12 1996 09:32 | 1 |
9.4661 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Tue Nov 12 1996 11:33 | 3 |
9.4662 | | SALEM::DODA | Visibly shaken, not stirred | Tue Nov 12 1996 11:43 | 1 |
9.4663 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Nov 21 1996 11:48 | 6 |
9.4664 | | BRAT::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::LongW | taxation without representation | Thu Nov 21 1996 13:14 | 7 |
9.4665 | wishin | HBAHBA::HAAS | but the reply came from Anchorage | Fri Nov 22 1996 09:22 | 2 |
9.4666 | Forbes rates QB: BBJ #1 | HBAHBA::HAAS | but the reply came from Anchorage | Fri Nov 22 1996 13:18 | 114 |
9.4667 | | BRAT::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::LongW | taxation without representation | Fri Nov 22 1996 13:29 | 5 |
9.4668 | another look at the contenders | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 02 1996 12:11 | 30 |
9.4669 | reverse KOD alert! ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | | Mon Dec 02 1996 13:07 | 0 |
9.4670 | Mort Report: Lett, Bettis, etc. | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 02 1996 14:53 | 172 |
9.4671 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Mon Dec 02 1996 15:16 | 5 |
9.4672 | weird | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 02 1996 15:24 | 8 |
9.4673 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Mon Dec 02 1996 15:30 | 7 |
9.4674 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Mon Dec 02 1996 15:35 | 8 |
9.4675 | what he said | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Tue Dec 03 1996 10:13 | 10 |
9.4676 | power rating | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Fri Dec 06 1996 11:13 | 58 |
9.4677 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 09 1996 12:08 | 51 |
9.4678 | Sounds Good To Me | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Dec 10 1996 09:35 | 10 |
9.4679 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Dec 10 1996 09:40 | 5 |
9.4680 | contenders | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Tue Dec 10 1996 11:01 | 61 |
9.4681 | tiebreakers | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Tue Dec 10 1996 11:04 | 170 |
9.4682 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Dec 10 1996 16:28 | 4 |
9.4683 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Dec 10 1996 19:22 | 9 |
9.4684 | nfl power rankings | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 11 1996 10:17 | 51 |
9.4685 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Dec 11 1996 12:22 | 3 |
9.4686 | And the beat goes on!! | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Wed Dec 11 1996 15:22 | 11 |
9.4687 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Wed Dec 11 1996 16:00 | 2 |
9.4688 | :*) | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Wed Dec 11 1996 16:02 | 4 |
9.4689 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Dec 11 1996 16:22 | 3 |
9.4690 | and that Holtz talk is over... | SALEM::DODA | Retired Gnip Gnop Champion | Wed Dec 11 1996 16:43 | 4 |
9.4691 | I'm not editting | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Dec 12 1996 15:54 | 103 |
9.4692 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Dec 12 1996 16:07 | 6 |
9.4693 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Thu Dec 12 1996 16:16 | 6 |
9.4694 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Just cover, baby! | Thu Dec 12 1996 16:36 | 6 |
9.4695 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Dec 12 1996 16:42 | 55 |
9.4696 | Number of Pro Bowlers per team | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Dec 12 1996 16:49 | 38 |
9.4697 | RE: .4691 | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Dec 13 1996 08:38 | 4 |
9.4698 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 16 1996 09:02 | 98 |
9.4699 | | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Mon Dec 16 1996 09:54 | 9 |
9.4700 | GO PATS!~ | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 16 1996 10:16 | 13 |
9.4701 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Mon Dec 16 1996 10:18 | 3 |
9.4702 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Mon Dec 16 1996 10:24 | 8 |
9.4703 | | 2975::WAUGAMAN | | Mon Dec 16 1996 11:04 | 15 |
9.4704 | could happen, possibly | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 16 1996 11:23 | 8 |
9.4705 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 17 1996 00:57 | 10 |
9.4706 | wassup? | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Tue Dec 17 1996 08:28 | 13 |
9.4707 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Dec 17 1996 08:46 | 12 |
9.4708 | Huh? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Dec 17 1996 08:51 | 9 |
9.4709 | Good Front offices helped | CSLALL::BRULE | Scooter Macgruder rules | Tue Dec 17 1996 09:00 | 7 |
9.4710 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 17 1996 09:18 | 18 |
9.4711 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 17 1996 09:28 | 19 |
9.4712 | all that and more | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Tue Dec 17 1996 09:57 | 19 |
9.4713 | | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Tue Dec 17 1996 10:11 | 9 |
9.4714 | salary cap effect | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Tue Dec 17 1996 10:20 | 24 |
9.4715 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Dec 17 1996 11:04 | 13 |
9.4716 | They'll play to win, like men | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 17 1996 11:12 | 8 |
9.4717 | | CHEFS::7A1_GRN | The long sobs of Autumn violins | Tue Dec 17 1996 11:32 | 6 |
9.4718 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 17 1996 14:45 | 5 |
9.4719 | Yes, this means I've given up on this season... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 17 1996 15:35 | 10 |
9.4720 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Just cover, baby! | Tue Dec 17 1996 16:29 | 4 |
9.4721 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Dec 17 1996 16:34 | 11 |
9.4722 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Dec 18 1996 09:59 | 9 |
9.4723 | | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Wed Dec 18 1996 10:13 | 7 |
9.4724 | another Boomer fan | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 18 1996 10:17 | 9 |
9.4725 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Dec 18 1996 10:30 | 10 |
9.4726 | they sip | SALEM::DODA | Retired Gnip Gnop Champion | Wed Dec 18 1996 10:36 | 7 |
9.4727 | | CSLALL::BRULE | Scooter Macgruder rules | Wed Dec 18 1996 10:54 | 3 |
9.4728 | great ads | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 18 1996 10:58 | 8 |
9.4729 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:15 | 9 |
9.4730 | Berman once was God, not no more | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:15 | 13 |
9.4731 | another bit o' luck | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:18 | 6 |
9.4732 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:20 | 7 |
9.4733 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:38 | 3 |
9.4734 | despondent | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:43 | 7 |
9.4735 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:44 | 7 |
9.4736 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:45 | 20 |
9.4737 | but how 'bout Ronnie Lott? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 18 1996 11:52 | 8 |
9.4738 | And yes them Sportscenter commercials are great.. | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Wed Dec 18 1996 12:04 | 5 |
9.4739 | not too bad, but ... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 18 1996 12:08 | 9 |
9.4740 | Poor Job With Pats | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Dec 18 1996 12:35 | 11 |
9.4741 | Power rankings | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 18 1996 12:39 | 49 |
9.4742 | I'd take Glanville in a second over him. | SALEM::DODA | Retired Gnip Gnop Champion | Wed Dec 18 1996 12:49 | 3 |
9.4743 | him too | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Wed Dec 18 1996 12:53 | 7 |
9.4744 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Dec 18 1996 14:16 | 6 |
9.4745 | "Man! Did you see that snot fly?" | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 18 1996 14:18 | 9 |
9.4746 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Dec 18 1996 14:23 | 13 |
9.4747 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Thu Dec 19 1996 11:18 | 5 |
9.4748 | speaking of... | SALEM::DODA | I'm BATMAN! | Thu Dec 19 1996 14:42 | 1 |
9.4749 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Thu Dec 19 1996 15:19 | 8 |
9.4750 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Dec 20 1996 08:54 | 7 |
9.4751 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Fri Dec 20 1996 09:12 | 2 |
9.4752 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | | Fri Dec 20 1996 09:41 | 3 |
9.4753 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Fri Dec 20 1996 10:50 | 13 |
9.4754 | New York New York what a wonderful town | CSLALL::BRULE | Scooter Macgruder rules | Fri Dec 20 1996 12:56 | 4 |
9.4755 | WGAF? | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | No directions needed | Fri Dec 20 1996 13:54 | 8 |
9.4756 | | NQOS01::nqsrv130.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Pee Wee Herman's bodydouble | Fri Dec 20 1996 16:40 | 5 |
9.4757 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Dec 23 1996 09:01 | 9 |
9.4758 | Morty not welcomed in Kansas City | CSLALL::BRULE | Scooter Macgruder rules | Mon Dec 23 1996 09:14 | 4 |
9.4759 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Dec 23 1996 09:50 | 11 |
9.4760 | | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Mon Dec 23 1996 10:01 | 6 |
9.4761 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Mon Dec 23 1996 11:04 | 4 |
9.4762 | only 1 favorite | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Tue Dec 24 1996 09:45 | 2 |
9.4763 | Even a blind squirrel finds a nut | IMINMK::SILVESTRI | Penuts Gang turns 10 in 1997! | Tue Dec 24 1996 10:27 | 12 |
9.4764 | Hope You're Right | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Dec 24 1996 13:56 | 7 |
9.4765 | why not | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Thu Dec 26 1996 11:21 | 24 |
9.4766 | | ALFSS2::ROLLINS_R | | Sun Dec 29 1996 00:01 | 13 |
9.4767 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Mon Dec 30 1996 09:11 | 6 |
9.4768 | ho hum | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 30 1996 09:33 | 20 |
9.4769 | Sagarin's opinion | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Mon Dec 30 1996 15:37 | 36 |
9.4770 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Dec 30 1996 15:57 | 3 |
9.4771 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Tue Dec 31 1996 08:14 | 4 |
9.4772 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Tue Dec 31 1996 08:17 | 0 |
9.4773 | RE: .4772 | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Tue Dec 31 1996 08:52 | 2 |
9.4774 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Dec 31 1996 09:08 | 5 |
9.4775 | what no smiley???? | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Tue Dec 31 1996 09:34 | 5 |
9.4776 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Chad Brown da main! | Tue Dec 31 1996 09:37 | 13 |
9.4777 | sorry | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Tue Dec 31 1996 10:40 | 20 |
9.4778 | | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Tue Dec 31 1996 11:06 | 9 |
9.4779 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Tue Dec 31 1996 11:18 | 2 |
9.4780 | playin golf with the Bills.... | PECAD8::CHILDS | Reeves in 97 | Tue Dec 31 1996 11:22 | 3 |
9.4781 | forecasts | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Fri Jan 03 1997 12:34 | 20 |
9.4782 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Chad Brown da main! | Fri Jan 03 1997 13:08 | 10 |
9.4783 | | MKOTS3::taydhcp-23-144-12.tay.dec.com::Long | taxation without representation | Fri Jan 03 1997 13:21 | 7 |
9.4784 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Chad Brown da main! | Fri Jan 03 1997 13:26 | 11 |
9.4785 | | BRAT::FORTIN_C | Where's the Spirit, Where's the Guts | Fri Jan 03 1997 13:30 | 7 |
9.4786 | keep it soft | HBAHBA::HAAS | Thank ya just a whole lot. | Fri Jan 03 1997 13:40 | 8 |
9.4787 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Jan 03 1997 16:49 | 10 |
9.4788 | GO PACK!!! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Sun Jan 05 1997 11:41 | 12 |
9.4789 | | ROCK::HUBER | From Seneca to Cuyahoga Falls | Mon Jan 06 1997 08:32 | 8 |
9.4790 | Anybody but the Patriots! | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 06 1997 08:48 | 10 |
9.4791 | still in recovery | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:17 | 18 |
9.4792 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:19 | 16 |
9.4794 | | DELNI::FORGET | | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:23 | 10 |
9.4795 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:31 | 11 |
9.4796 | Great games this past weekend | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | No directions needed | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:31 | 14 |
9.4797 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:34 | 6 |
9.4798 | Pack Stuff | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:37 | 33 |
9.4799 | | SALEM::DODA | How could we know that promises end? | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:44 | 4 |
9.4800 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:47 | 14 |
9.4801 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:52 | 4 |
9.4802 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:53 | 11 |
9.4803 | Ouch | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'D is Gawd | Mon Jan 06 1997 09:58 | 25 |
9.4804 | Clemson refs lose out | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | No directions needed | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:08 | 13 |
9.4805 | Don't go abbreviatin' on me! | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:10 | 5 |
9.4806 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:14 | 22 |
9.4807 | unbelievable | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:21 | 15 |
9.4808 | A team in decline | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Mon Jan 06 1997 10:41 | 10 |
9.4809 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Mon Jan 06 1997 11:06 | 10 |
9.4810 | looked like a fix, smelt like a fix, ... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Mon Jan 06 1997 11:09 | 14 |
9.4811 | That's coaching and execution | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'D is Gawd | Mon Jan 06 1997 11:15 | 17 |
9.4812 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:20 | 7 |
9.4813 | Jax will be jacked gotta come out with the same fire | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:38 | 15 |
9.4814 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:58 | 8 |
9.4815 | Cowher blew it again | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 06 1997 16:41 | 15 |
9.4816 | I'm sure he just forgot.... | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Mon Jan 06 1997 16:50 | 6 |
9.4817 | ???? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 06 1997 16:57 | 5 |
9.4818 | That reporter got lucky | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 06 1997 17:36 | 9 |
9.4819 | For The Record | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 07 1997 09:08 | 52 |
9.4820 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Tue Jan 07 1997 10:16 | 13 |
9.4821 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Tue Jan 07 1997 10:34 | 13 |
9.4822 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Kazaam's my man | Tue Jan 07 1997 11:19 | 13 |
9.4823 | Agree | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 07 1997 11:45 | 10 |
9.4824 | not as good | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Tue Jan 07 1997 12:47 | 6 |
9.4825 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jan 07 1997 12:55 | 8 |
9.4826 | the more they expand the lower the level | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Tue Jan 07 1997 14:26 | 13 |
9.4827 | sign me up | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Tue Jan 07 1997 14:31 | 7 |
9.4828 | Early Draft | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Tue Jan 07 1997 14:38 | 18 |
9.4829 | | EVMS::MDNITE::RIVERS | No comment | Tue Jan 07 1997 14:53 | 8 |
9.4830 | Playoff rosters | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Tue Jan 07 1997 14:58 | 276 |
9.4831 | Cowher simply blew it | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 07 1997 19:09 | 14 |
9.4832 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 08 1997 08:26 | 4 |
9.4833 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Wed Jan 08 1997 08:28 | 6 |
9.4834 | must be just waking from his nap | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Wed Jan 08 1997 08:37 | 6 |
9.4835 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 09:17 | 17 |
9.4836 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:11 | 22 |
9.4837 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:31 | 13 |
9.4838 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:56 | 7 |
9.4839 | coulda been | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Wed Jan 08 1997 10:56 | 1 |
9.4840 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:26 | 11 |
9.4841 | My eyes are open-- get your prescription fixed, wouldya? | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 11:49 | 13 |
9.4842 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 08 1997 13:59 | 13 |
9.4843 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 14:07 | 20 |
9.4844 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 08 1997 14:15 | 10 |
9.4845 | You're killing me billte... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | Steelers are punks-- O'Donnell is Gawd | Wed Jan 08 1997 14:26 | 22 |
9.4846 | billte == comic extrordinaire | MKOTS3::LONG | Bradshaw better commentator than QB | Wed Jan 08 1997 14:55 | 9 |
9.4847 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 08 1997 15:24 | 26 |
9.4848 | Objectivity from a Steeler fan | FABSIX::D_HORTERT | | Thu Jan 09 1997 21:42 | 11 |
9.4849 | KIND OF OBJECTIVE | FABSIX::R_LUCHT | "Ten Feet Tall and Bulletproof" | Fri Jan 10 1997 00:59 | 3 |
9.4850 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Fri Jan 10 1997 10:29 | 8 |
9.4851 | I wish you were here, the weather is beautiful | HBAHBA::HAAS | Expansion Boy | Fri Jan 10 1997 14:14 | 9 |
9.4852 | FYI - DEC and Jaguar connection | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Fri Jan 10 1997 16:46 | 28 |
9.4853 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 13 1997 15:57 | 29 |
9.4854 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Mon Jan 13 1997 16:46 | 8 |
9.4855 | Seems Contradictory | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Mon Jan 13 1997 16:58 | 10 |
9.4856 | | RTL::ROSE | Steve Rose | Mon Jan 13 1997 17:07 | 13 |
9.4857 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 13 1997 17:40 | 12 |
9.4858 | bah! | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Mon Jan 13 1997 20:00 | 18 |
9.4859 | Not Quite... | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 14 1997 07:49 | 13 |
9.4860 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Tue Jan 14 1997 10:36 | 4 |
9.4861 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Tue Jan 14 1997 10:41 | 1 |
9.4862 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Tue Jan 14 1997 10:54 | 2 |
9.4863 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Tue Jan 14 1997 11:31 | 3 |
9.4864 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Tue Jan 14 1997 15:02 | 3 |
9.4865 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Jan 15 1997 09:45 | 7 |
9.4866 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Mon Jan 20 1997 14:04 | 3 |
9.4867 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 20 1997 14:50 | 9 |
9.4868 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 20 1997 15:14 | 6 |
9.4869 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Mon Jan 20 1997 15:23 | 3 |
9.4870 | | SALEM::DODA | One World within.... | Mon Jan 20 1997 15:31 | 9 |
9.4871 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Mon Jan 20 1997 15:44 | 4 |
9.4872 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 20 1997 15:47 | 33 |
9.4873 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Mon Jan 20 1997 15:48 | 6 |
9.4874 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Mon Jan 20 1997 16:59 | 2 |
9.4875 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 20 1997 17:12 | 3 |
9.4876 | | WONDER::REILLY | Sean Reilly, Alpha Servers, DTN 223-4375 | Tue Jan 21 1997 08:44 | 13 |
9.4877 | the guy can't stay calm in a broadcast booth... | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Tue Jan 21 1997 08:49 | 5 |
9.4878 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jan 21 1997 09:02 | 1 |
9.4879 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jan 21 1997 09:02 | 3 |
9.4880 | | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 21 1997 09:52 | 9 |
9.4881 | was unemployed all of 3 days - should do well there too | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Tue Jan 21 1997 10:40 | 1 |
9.4882 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jan 21 1997 11:11 | 17 |
9.4883 | Scorecard please | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 21 1997 12:13 | 6 |
9.4884 | I'll have to learn to spell it | AD::HEATH | The albatross and whales they are my brother | Tue Jan 21 1997 12:16 | 4 |
9.4885 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Tue Jan 21 1997 12:21 | 3 |
9.4886 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | R.I.O.T. | Tue Jan 21 1997 12:48 | 2 |
9.4887 | | MYLIFE::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy SHR3-1/P32 237-2468 | Tue Jan 21 1997 13:27 | 14 |
9.4888 | Oops sorry for the missing w | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 21 1997 13:34 | 2 |
9.4889 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jan 21 1997 14:01 | 12 |
9.4890 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Jan 21 1997 14:04 | 2 |
9.4891 | | NQOS01::nqsrv345.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Pee Wee Herman's bodydouble | Wed Jan 22 1997 10:20 | 1 |
9.4892 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:37 | 44 |
|
Time passes with all the cruelty of a woman toying with your affections, and
the inexorable swiftness of a storm-driven tide wiping clean all that stands
before it on the shore. Then, like accountants with our hands caught in the
till, we stutter and stammering trying to atone for the months and years that
have slipped through our fingers like water.
I was eight years old. My life was no more complicated than it had ever been,
and no more simple than it ever would get. All I had to worry about was the
occasional homework assignment from school, practicing for the music lessons I
had just started taking, playing ball with my brother and the neighborhood
kids, and watching ball on TV.
I rememeber distinctly kneeling in church, St. Paul's Roman Catholic in the
center of Glastonbury, that January morning, praying to the God I worshipped
with that innocent faith a child has. "Please, God," I prayed, "Let the
Packers win."
I seriously doubt it was my prayer that helped them, because the Lombardi sweep
worked with or without Divine intervention, but it worked that day, along with
a second string wide receiver who'd worked a little too hard partying the night
before, a get-it-done quarterback who'd played for the Bear, a hard-nosed
middle linebacker, and the man who was the architect of their glory, the great
Vince Lombardi.
It wasn't even called the Super Bowl then, and it wasn't sold out. It was
simply the NFL-AFL Championship Game, and Vince Lombardi's Packers beat up on
the Kansas City Chiefs. My first and foremost memories are the game are not
the adult memories, voiced-over by the late John Facenda, but those of a child,
rooting hard for his favorites, and feeling so glad they won.
It felt strange then, to watch last night's game. For the first time in almost
thirty years, the Packers were playing for the Super Bowl championship. The
players names were all different, and there scarcely a two-bar facemask to be
seen in the building. But the Packers carried with them the legacy of those
years under the man I feel was, arguably, the best coach in NFL history, a
legacy just as powerful now as the Lombardi sweep was back then.
So where, I wondered, have all the years gone? It seemed like only yesterday
when it was Bart Starr, Max McGee, Jerry Kramer, and Ray Nitschke, and Lombardi
prowled the sidelines. Am I really that old? Has the time gone that quickly?
Yes, I'm afraid it has.....
|
9.4893 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:44 | 11 |
| When I was down at the cape a couple years ago I ran into an older guy who
was running a B&B. Him and another guy from Jersey were talking about how in
their city the villages were known by the name of their Church. He said that
when he went to Highschool, Vince Lombardi was the football coach and the
chemistry teacher.
He went on to say that although no big talent player ever played on his
highschool team and hardly anyone went on to play in college, Lombardi's
highschool teams almost never lost. He was the greatest at every level.
George
|
9.4894 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:47 | 1 |
| CHOKE
|
9.4895 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Mon Jan 27 1997 09:50 | 24 |
| >their city the villages were known by the name of their Church. He said that
>when he went to Highschool, Vince Lombardi was the football coach and the
>chemistry teacher.
One of Parcell's coaches was a student and player for Lombardi.
I think that Lombardi did so much more than coach. He molded his players into
successful people. If you've ever read _Run_To_Daylight_, the tenets and
precepts that come through regarding football, are equally applicable to life
in general.
My favorite is:
The glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time you
fall.
> He went on to say that although no big talent player ever played on his
>highschool team and hardly anyone went on to play in college, Lombardi's
>highschool teams almost never lost. He was the greatest at every level.
Yeah, that's Lombardi....8^)
|
9.4896 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | | Mon Jan 27 1997 10:22 | 2 |
|
TWO WORDS ---> CHOCK!
|
9.4897 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Mon Jan 27 1997 11:18 | 8 |
|
Congratulations to the Packers, they played a good, mistake free game. The
Patriots gave a good account of themselves, but made too many mistakes
to win against a NFC team.
Will the afc ever win another SB?
|
9.4898 | an outsiders view | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Mon Jan 27 1997 23:38 | 32 |
| I know I've said it before (so I'm not getting that old),
but I'll never understand if I live to be a hundred why
in the region known as New England sports fans old and
young become ardent supporters of teams they have no
regional connection to. I can see 'Saw being a Giants
fan given the area where he grew up being kinda midway
between New Yuck City and Beantown. But I know of no
kid who grew up in Western PA who would ever admit to
praying for a team that wasn't from that area. I don't
care if the Steelers were signed up for tee times, which
when I was growing up the were, or not. You might have
a passing fancy for some other team, but you NEVER, and I
do mean NEVER, would call yourself a fan of some other
team. Most folks from other areas of the country seem
to follow suit.
In these days of mega-marketing kids will wear the logo
of their current superstar, or the team that just won the
championship no matter where they live. But that's not
who I'm talking about. I'm refering to the Baby Boomers
who grew up thinking PF Flyers were without a doubt some
miracle of modern science that really did improve your
leaping ability. Those sports fans were true blue to the
hometown team no matter how bad they sucked. That is,
except in New England.
Folks have tried to tell be about the Babe Ruth Jinx, but
to me it just doesn't sink in. Something tells me it
never will.
billl
|
9.4899 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Tue Jan 28 1997 08:29 | 4 |
|
What was the diatribe in .4898 based on, Wile E.? For a second I
thought it had "MKOTS3::BREEN" in the header...
|
9.4900 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Tue Jan 28 1997 08:48 | 7 |
|
It's called freedom of choice Bill. In New England we have so much more than
just Sports, that we become more rounded in our choices..............
;^)
skippy
|
9.4901 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Jan 28 1997 08:52 | 17 |
| Well I guess the question on the other side of the coin is, why SHOULD you
be limited to a team in your geographical area?
If teams were made up of players who were from your area and if coaches came
from your area then sure. For the most part it works that way in highschool,
the kids on the team are the same kids in your class. But pro sports are
different. Always have been. Players come from anywhere, coaches come from
anywhere, the GM comes from anywhere, some times even the owners are not local.
If you see a team that has players you like better or a team philosophy you
like better why not be a fan? Conversely, if you are turned off by the players
or the philosophy of the local team why should you be restricted?
It's a free country (or at least we like to think it is), why have rules
saying what team you can and what team you can't support?
George
|
9.4902 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:15 | 10 |
|
billl,
If I was to guess, I'd probably say that the different behavior is a
result of TV. Before the ESPNs and game of the weeks... all people had
were 4 minutes on the news and a newspaper that never covered, beyond
the AP story, any other teams than a local one.
Marc
|
9.4903 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:16 | 9 |
|
Most of the people wearing gear of other teams
are frontrunners. You never see anybody with a
Tamp Bay Bucs or New Orleans Saints jersey up here.
Mainly, it's the Cowboys, 9ers or the occasional
Steelers or Dolphins. Nowadays alot of them are trying
to pass themselves off as Pats fans but give them
two or three bad seasons and they'll move on to
a new team.
|
9.4904 | This could be good... | EDWIN::WAUGAMAN | | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:21 | 8 |
|
> What was the diatribe in .4898 based on, Wile E.? For a second I
> thought it had "MKOTS3::BREEN" in the header...
Breen was a NY Giants fan... expect a diatribe in response...
glenn
|
9.4905 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:45 | 28 |
| The first team I ever rooted for was the Green Bay Packers. Probably because
we saw them on TV a lot when I was young, along with the Giants. Being a kid,
I knew nothing of some of the bitter games between the two, so I rooted for
both. It made sense to me that one was in the Western Division, the other in
the Eastern Division.
I had two favorite Giants -- Homer Jones and Tucker Fredrickson. I had a mess
of favorite Packers (and as a hint of my great respect later in life for
behemoth offensive linemen, one of them was Gerry Kramer).
I think if you live in a locality, you automatically root for that team. But
with football, because of television and the old AFL-NFL split, you have some
different allegiances.
As a kid, I was an NFL bigot. The sissy teams in the AFL sucked. And yep, my
nose hurt just as bad as the other NFL bigot's noses the day Joe Willie came to
town. Kind of woke me up.
In Connecticut, you have a lot of folks who have split allegiance between NY
and Boston, but if you look at mine, the football allegiance to NY is based on
TV -- I never watched the Boston Patriots. The rest of my alliances are pretty
much Boston based.... Tried the Whalers for a while (that "local" thing) but
came back to where I belonged eventually....
'Saw
|
9.4906 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:50 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4904 by EDWIN::WAUGAMAN >>>
> Breen was a NY Giants fan... expect a diatribe in response...
Back in Bill's day the Giants were New England's home team. For that matter
back when I was a kid the AFL was just starting up and not many people outside
of Boston gave it much thought. Most of Western Mass where I grew up were
Giants fans.
Those were the Y.A. Tittle days when Frank Gifford was strictly a flanker
back. I bet Bill goes back to the Charlie Conley days when Gifford ran the
ball.
Not sure of the spellen's but names that come to mind were Andi Robistelli,
Jim Katkavage, Dick Mozuleski, Jim Lutzkatof, Jimmy Patton, Sam Huff, Y.A.
Tittle, Phil King, Frank Gifford, Dale Shofner ... quite a team.
Good point a few back about the influence of TV.
George
|
9.4907 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jan 28 1997 09:53 | 8 |
| George, you did massacre the spellings, but you hit a lot of the Giants
favorites. Most of them were gone just before I started really watching them.
Andy Robustelli ran a travel agency in southern CT last I knew, but he's
probably retired now.
'Saw
|
9.4908 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:27 | 4 |
| | -< an outsiders view >-
Bill, what's even more incomprehensible are all the youngsters today
who root for a player rather than a team.
|
9.4909 | need more info | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:37 | 5 |
| > who root for a player rather than a team.
Ya mean like KJ and not the Suns :=]
TTom
|
9.4910 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:39 | 1 |
| Could be any player TTom.
|
9.4911 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:41 | 14 |
| I agree with Billl 100%. As a 50s Giants fan (there were no Patriots)
I couldn't understand the few, the hopeless, the deficient who rooted
for the Cleveland Browns. Personally that 56-63 Giants team was my
favorite team of all time except for the one 1967 Redsox team.
In 1964 Allie Sherman cleaned out all the old stars, traded Huff,
Tittle and Gifford lost it over night, Grier gone etc and I made a
clean switch to the Patriots who had Harry Crump and Art Graham and
other locals (Bellino).
George had it pretty well wrapped up except for the zeal that Giants
fans had for those immortal teams. Five tough nfl championship losses
from 1958-63 but preceded by some tremendous victories, mainly over Jim
and Paul Brown and the hated, detested Cleveland Browns.
|
9.4912 | | NQOS01::nqsrv307.nqo.dec.com::Workbench | Inside Intel | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:44 | 8 |
| I thinky Marc-y Mac 8^) got it right a few back about TV. In the 60's it
was the Giants on TV all the time, and they became popular in NE. Now
it's the Cowboys&Niners on TV all the time.
And, if you think you got lots of fans from different teams there, ya
oughta come out here.
Brews
|
9.4913 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Tue Jan 28 1997 10:48 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4908 by PHXSS1::HEISER "Maranatha!" >>>
> Bill, what's even more incomprehensible are all the youngsters today
> who root for a player rather than a team.
Well that's not particularly a young man's issue either. Unless of course
you consider those of us hovering around 50 as young. I remember back in
the early 60's there were a lot of Willie Mays fans that didn't know much or
care much about the rest of the S.F. Giants. And I'll bet that back in the 20's
and 30's there were a lot of Babe Ruth fans that were not necessarily New
York Yankee fans.
As for the 19th Century, keep in mind the poem is "Casey at the Bat", not
"Sad day for Mudville".
George
|
9.4914 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:27 | 6 |
|
For me its following the teams my Father and Grandfather followed
plus the local NE teams. Since I'm from New York, it was always the
Giants in Football and the Mets in baseball.
Ron
|
9.4915 | Nope, No sir. I don't like it a bit. | SUBSYS::BAILLIE | UltraSCSI, myth or fact | Tue Jan 28 1997 11:53 | 6 |
| re: <<< Note 9.4905 by CAM::WAY "and keep me steadfast" >>>
'Saw
What no Henry Long or Spider Lockhart!!!
jb , who use to love the Dallas/NYG matchups of that era
|
9.4916 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Tue Jan 28 1997 12:33 | 11 |
| > What no Henry Long or Spider Lockhart!!!
Spider I remember. I was trying to list guys who left just before I started
watching.
Spider was always a favorite, and he died much too young.
Late 50s, early 60s the Giants had a powerful defense, that actually received
some recognition, which annoyed the offensive stars. They had Landry and
Lombardi as assistant coaches -- what a tandem, eh?
|
9.4917 | AMERICA'S TEAM | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Tue Jan 28 1997 12:42 | 4 |
| Well, I had yesterday off and am really busy right now, but
just to let you know, I am a VERY happy camper!!!
Tony
|
9.4918 | | MKOTS3::LONG | Taxation without representation | Wed Jan 29 1997 00:11 | 13 |
| re .4911:
> I agree with Billl 100%.
Now I know I was way off base.
George, no one said it was "against the rules". I was only
trying to verbalize what to most other areas of the country
is an "unwritten law". Now that in no way means some
legislator wrote a bill. It's more an accepted way of life.
billl
|
9.4919 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Wed Jan 29 1997 08:50 | 15 |
| So fine, it's a tradition. Like any tradition it's followed some places and
not followed others.
I believe the tradition started because prior to TV the home team was the
one fans were able to follow week after week. Also the tradition gets a boost
from highschool, semi-pro and amateur where you actually know the players.
But other than momentum I see no reason why the tradition should be followed.
Times have "ah-changed" again and now Cable, ESPN, and superstations make it
much easier to follow teams in other locations. If supporting the geographically
local team is what floats your boat then fine. However if you choose to by pass
that particular tradition and support someone else then why not? After all
it's only entertainment.
George
|
9.4920 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 29 1997 13:05 | 5 |
|
If it's cool to follow teams from other parts of the country
then why are you so worried about the patsies moving if you
don't actually go to games? You could always just follow them
on tv like you've been doing since they started winning.
|
9.4921 | Marvin + Nancy = Ralph | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 29 1997 13:44 | 14 |
| Tommy, hold on there. He's already attended several Redsox games in
the last few years not to speak of an attendance at the Fleet Center
for a Marvin Hammlisch at the piano, pretty maids a skating
extravaganza. And if the Patriots go indoors in Boston where he can
take the T he vowed to make a game or two. So what's a problem? Not
enough sports events.
My wife loves figure skating and I swear I'm going to take her to one
of those events if the pepcid research people can find something that
would handle Ralph.
Trivia for real sports fans. What on the dial when surfing the tv
makes you flip faster than FS ? No, line dancing is only .0002
millisecs.
|
9.4922 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Wed Jan 29 1997 13:46 | 6 |
|
When did I ever say I was worried about the Pats leaving?
In fact I do cheer for remote teams such as the Braves.
George
|
9.4923 | boink-ka boink-ka boink ... | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Wed Jan 29 1997 13:48 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4921 by MKOTS3::BREEN "Sans Doute" >>>
> Trivia for real sports fans. What on the dial when surfing the tv
> makes you flip faster than FS ? No, line dancing is only .0002
> millisecs.
College Basketball.
George
|
9.4924 | criminal | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Wed Jan 29 1997 13:59 | 11 |
| > College Basketball.
My current pet peave is the TV listings which intermingle Men's college
hoops with women's. You scan the list and right after Georgia Southern
playing UT-Chattanooga, you see something like Wake vs Duke only to
discover that it aint Tim Duncan going up against Greg Newton but the
distaffs.
They oughta be listed under some other heading, at least.
TTom
|
9.4925 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:06 | 2 |
|
Syncronized Swimming.........
|
9.4926 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:06 | 9 |
|
>> When did I ever say I was worried about the Pats leaving?
It was pretty much the basis of your whole let's build beggin'
Bob a stdium spiel. That and the misguided notion that there's
an economic benefit from an NFL stdium to anyone but the owner.
I quote, "I want an NFL franchise in town and I'm willing to pay
my fair share to see that happen." According to what you're saying
now your "fair share" is your cable bill.
|
9.4927 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:07 | 6 |
|
> Trivia for real sports fans. What on the dial when surfing the tv
> makes you flip faster than FS ? No, line dancing is only .0002
> millisecs.
Feminine hygiene commercials but I guess that's the same thing.
|
9.4928 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:09 | 14 |
| Quicker than FS?
For me that would be any of the following:
o That Scottish boob with the non-stick cookware infomercial.
o Any Richard Simmons infomercial
o Tony "I'm John Elway's Twin Dental Brother" Robbins
|
9.4929 | some that bother | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:12 | 21 |
| While nothing really comes close to the instantaneous flipping that
figger skating causes, there are some sprots that are close.
I really have a hard time with any kinda tennis. Put 'em on skates and
ice and you might have something.
MLB is a time honored sprot to avoid like the plague. I see no such easy
solution here.
After seeing _Kingpin_ I find myself watching a little bowling just to
see if'n the guys hand stays with the ball and lumbers down the lane with
it.
Women's hoops does nothing for me. I much prefer the shoe commercial
where all of 'em where high heels. I find myself fantasizing that they're
in prison and wearing nothing else. That'd make it something worth
watching.
And of course, if'n I never see another soccer match it'd be too soon.
TTom
|
9.4930 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:14 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4926 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> It was pretty much the basis of your whole let's build beggin'
> Bob a stdium spiel. That and the misguided notion that there's
> an economic benefit from an NFL stdium to anyone but the owner.
> I quote, "I want an NFL franchise in town and I'm willing to pay
> my fair share to see that happen." According to what you're saying
> now your "fair share" is your cable bill.
This is an entirely different argument than the one that we are having here.
Even if I personally support having a local team that does not mean I fell that
people should be bound by tradition to only cheer for local teams.
I would still like to see a new Stadium for the Patriots and I would still
like to see them stay in the Greater Boston area but I have no problem with
someone who wants to live in one part of the country and cheer for a team
that is located somewhere else.
Really, I don't see any connection between the two issues.
George
|
9.4931 | my tree of woe is the dough | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:19 | 11 |
| Or the dandruff commercial with the "break a leg". That was voted
the worst commercial back about '92 and it's still airing, every day on
a host of channels.
I do like them Dukes of Hazzard except when they do the cousins
instead of Luke Duke etal. And if Waylon is croon'n that's sure to be
a good'n.
And speak'n of flipp'n thru the guide, I missed Conan the Barbarian
last Saturday. He'd just lit up his ex and it was CdaB not CdaD with
Wilt. CdaB is just about the best movie ever filmed.
|
9.4932 | another vote for Conan | HBAHBA::HAAS | Dorsey Levens Roolz!~ | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:28 | 5 |
| > CdaB is just about the best movie ever filmed.
It gets a top rating from this noter as well.
TTom
|
9.4933 | | PHXSS1::HEISER | Maranatha! | Wed Jan 29 1997 14:31 | 4 |
| Re: bowling
Anything where higher consumption of alcoholic beverages improve your
score is not a sport.
|
9.4934 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 29 1997 15:22 | 13 |
|
>> I would still like to see a new Stadium for the Patriots and
>> I would still like to see them stay in the Greater Boston area
>> but I have no problem with someone who wants to live in one part
>> of the country and cheer for a team that is located somewhere else.
I can understand why you wouldn't care who a given person cheers
for regadless of where they live. What I don't get is how you
square that with wanting to build a stadium for to keep a team
that you won't go see anyways. That doesn't make any sense to me.
Why not just call his bluff because if they move you can do what
you're doing anyways and watch 'em on tv when they're goin good.
|
9.4935 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Wed Jan 29 1997 15:40 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4934 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> I can understand why you wouldn't care who a given person cheers
> for regadless of where they live. What I don't get is how you
> square that with wanting to build a stadium for to keep a team
> that you won't go see anyways.
While I defend the right to cheer for teams not in town and while I even do
it on occasion, there is still an advantage to having teams in town.
Local teams create a lot of excitement. If you have a local team the papers
cater to fans who do restrict themselves to local clubs and print more
information about the team and the sports in general. More people take
interest and there is more discussion.
In sort, it's fun to have a team in town, whether you are cheering for them
or not. Also, if they made it a dome instead of an open stadium then it might
make some sense to go to a winter game and they might even draw a Superbowl
or two. That would also be fun.
George
|
9.4936 | Final score from the Dell: 2-2 | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass is back - watch out NCAA! | Wed Jan 29 1997 15:40 | 14 |
| I stayed up and watched most of the Newcastle - Southampton match on
ESPN2 the other night TTom - it was tremendous football. Les Ferdinand
scooped up a loose ball in the area and rammed it home for an early
Newcastle lead, then ALan Shearer sent Rob Lee away with a gorgeous
through ball, and Lee made no mistake, putting Newcastle up 2-nil with
only seven minutes remaining. But the weak Newcastle defense failed to
clear a ball and left keeper Shaka Hislop defenseless in the 88th
minute, bringing Southampton to 2-1. Then, two minutes into injury
time, Matthew LeTissier send the capacity crowd home happy with a rifle
shot from 22 yards out that he tucked just inside the near corner,
giving Southampton a point and spoiling Kenny Dalgleish's first game
as Newcastle's new manager.
NAZZ
|
9.4937 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 29 1997 16:24 | 19 |
|
>> If you have a local team the papers cater to fans who do restrict
>> themselves to local clubs and print more information about the team
>> and the sports in general.
How many of these Patriots articles do you read? I'm guessing not
many if at all.
>> Also, if they made it a dome instead of an open stadium then it might
>> make some sense to go to a winter game
You could always go in September, October or November.
>> and they might even draw a Superbowl or two.
If the Patsies build a dome, they'll get the complimentary *one*
SB like Detroit did. Boston is no party town especially in January.
The corprate mucky-mucks and assorted highrollers that shell out the
big bucks at the SB don't want to be here in January.
|
9.4938 | You sure we haven't had Dallas in town already? | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 29 1997 16:34 | 5 |
| Tommy your forgetting the big ice pageants: ice capades,ice follies,
Disney on ice, Hamlisch on ice, legends of ice...
The Cowboys would surely want to visit the Museums around town. Come
to think of it we are missing a few paintings...
|
9.4939 | | OLD1S::CADZILLA2 | PM&D PSE Tools Support | Wed Jan 29 1997 16:41 | 3 |
|
Has there been a shortage of Toot in beantown?
|
9.4940 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Wed Jan 29 1997 16:53 | 15 |
|
The 'boys don't want to come Boston either. The infamous red
light district known as the Combat Zone is essentially gone.
The Naked I may still be there but the place is seedier than
the Burppee catalog and Princess Cheyenne if she's still working
has got to be pushing 60 and the sight of her may be enough to
put you off of women and booze. Fans of dance have to travel to
the hinterlands of the suburbs to see true arteests at work. And
for my money, a great red light district is more a delimeter of
a great city than a domed football stadium is. Last I checked Paris
didn't have a domed stadium but did have the dancing girlies down
at the Crazy Horse Saloon. So if I have a vote let's spend our
tax money on some first class nudie bars and let the Indianpolises
of the world have the domed stadiums.
|
9.4941 | | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Wed Jan 29 1997 16:56 | 12 |
| There's been no shortage of criticism of Parcells for his assumed
departure. By this time Tagliabue may have ruled but no one gives his
staying much of a chance. But if Tag ruled a high draft choice then
Hess may want to just wait a year.
Now does Parcells say, "Okay, for a lousy 1.2 mil I'll show up
Sundays". So Kraft says, take 800k and screw. So Bill joins Howey and
cro-magnon man and Ronnie and friends and prepares to coach the Jets in
1998.
Meanwhile who coaches the two teams in the meantime? Wayne Fontes and
Rich Kotite?
|
9.4942 | Can't Compare to the Frozen Tundra!! | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Wed Jan 29 1997 17:37 | 9 |
| Speaking of stadiums, I just have to reiterate what I have heard
Madden say more than a couple times.
"If there ever was a shrine for the NFL, it would be right here
in LAMBEAU FIELD."
The Pack is BY FAR the coolest team to root for!!!
Tony
|
9.4943 | one of God's gifts to Men | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Thu Jan 30 1997 08:45 | 2 |
| Geez Tommy don't be dissin' Princess Chey, she don't look a day over 45.
Cosmetic Surgey is wonderful thing.........
|
9.4944 | gotta love it.... | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Thu Jan 30 1997 08:59 | 11 |
| > last Saturday. He'd just lit up his ex and it was CdaB not CdaD with
> Wilt. CdaB is just about the best movie ever filmed.
"Conan, what is best in life?"
"To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the
lamentations of their women"
- Conan the Barbarian
|
9.4945 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 30 1997 09:08 | 27 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4937 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> How many of these Patriots articles do you read? I'm guessing not
> many if at all.
>
> You could always go in September, October or November.
>
> If the Patsies build a dome, they'll get the complimentary *one*
> SB like Detroit did. Boston is no party town especially in January.
> The corprate mucky-mucks and assorted highrollers that shell out the
> big bucks at the SB don't want to be here in January.
None of which has anything to do with the discussion at hand which is why
anyone would be a fan of a team that is not in town.
Obviously if you like a team that's not in town you would probably be happier
if they lived closer but that may not be enough to make you stop being a fan.
For example, after the baseball Giants moved to San Francisco they still had a
lot of fans in Western Mass, some who like the team because they liked Willie
Mays and some who had gone to Springfield Giants AA games and knew the other
players on the team.
Now I'm sure they would have been happier if the Giants had come back to the
region and would have supported a stadium in the New York, Boston area but they
still liked the team anyway even though they were out in S.F.
George
|
9.4946 | beware of gift bearing geeks | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Thu Jan 30 1997 09:34 | 15 |
| Tony,
Careful about cozeying up to ol' Madden.
The onliest reason he's saying anything about the Pack is that his main
squeeze, the Cowboys, done got beat by the Painters, who he similarly
dissed. All Madden could get up for was Lambeau Field, Vince Lombardi and
the history of the team. He's still wishing it were Dallas winning the
big show.
But there are a lot of people who genuinely like them Pack. Bill Polian,
for example, is fixin to come calling for one of my main main on that
bandwagon, downtown Gilbert Brown. The Painters luv Gilbert Brown.
TTom
|
9.4947 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 10:28 | 21 |
|
>> None of which has anything to do with the discussion at
>> hand which is why anyone would be a fan of a team that is
>> not in town.
This *is* the "discussion at hand".
>> Obviously if you like a team that's not in town you would
>> probably be happier if they lived closer but that may not
>> be enough to make you stop being a fan.
I'd be happier if they lived closer so that I could actually
go to games. But seeing as how you don't go to Pats games and
you believe it's ok to be fans of remote teams. Why would you
care where they're located? You don't really follow them in the
paper and even if you did there's always the internet. And if you
really believe that the Braves are as much a Boston team as the
Red Sox as you stated before then why would the Pats should they
move be any less so when their departure would be more recent?
Looking for a little consistency here.
|
9.4948 | tommy's hit on something here | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | UMass is back - watch out NCAA! | Thu Jan 30 1997 10:48 | 9 |
| Re. 9.4940 - The first note I've read that has its priorities intact
when it comes to what a first-class city really needs. I say take that
open space in South Boston and drop our own version of the French
Quarter of New Orleans in there. Bourbon Street north, as it were.
That would do wonders for tourism, and bring people back into the city
from the suburbs. Would have to pass an ordinance allowing the selling
of alcoholic beverages in paper cups, though.
NAZZ
|
9.4949 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 30 1997 11:02 | 35 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4947 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> I'd be happier if they lived closer so that I could actually
> go to games. But seeing as how you don't go to Pats games and
> you believe it's ok to be fans of remote teams. Why would you
> care where they're located?
First of all, your question only applies to me so regardless of the answer
it has little to do with whether other people should be allowed to support
teams out of town.
But since you asked, I do support teams out of town however I would prefer
that they were near by and that their games were easy to attend. However that's
only one part of being a fan. While I would rather be able to attend Braves
games in person (which I did when I went to Atlanta Decus in '91) and I would
be happy if they came back to town (which they are in August) that does not
stop me from being a fan.
>You don't really follow them in the
> paper and even if you did there's always the internet.
I do read about them in the paper if it shows up before I leave in the
morning which is at best a 50-50 proposition.
>And if you
> really believe that the Braves are as much a Boston team as the
> Red Sox as you stated before then why would the Pats should they
> move be any less so when their departure would be more recent?
> Looking for a little consistency here.
When did I ever say the Pats would be less a Boston team if they left? In
fact they did leave Boston just like the Braves but I didn't stop following
them just because they became the Providence Pats.
George
|
9.4950 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 11:49 | 13 |
|
>> But since you asked, I do support teams out of town however I
>> would prefer that they were near by and that their games were
>> easy to attend.
That's why I ask the question that you seem unwilling to answer
which is, if you don't go to Pats games why do you care where
they're located to the point where you're even willing to spend
good money to keep them? I can understand why a season ticketholder
or even someone like myself who attends games when he can would
want to keep them (though I won't give Kraft a dime more than
the price of a ticket) but I don't get why folks who don't go
to games want to throw money at Kraft.
|
9.4951 | Nothing like a $7 Bud | LEXSS1::MURPHY | | Thu Jan 30 1997 12:05 | 8 |
| re: Princess Cheyenne
Through a strange twist, I happen to know Cheyenne's whereabouts and
real name. Last place she worked was the Foxy Lady in Providence (she
may still be there). She married a Boston cop and live in the suburbs
with a kid.
Dan
|
9.4952 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Thu Jan 30 1997 12:44 | 6 |
|
yeah I saw here there about a year and half ago that's why I know she's not
a day over 45. Plus all that experience is a plus when perform a fine art like
dancing........
mc
|
9.4953 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 30 1997 12:57 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4950 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> That's why I ask the question that you seem unwilling to answer
> which is, if you don't go to Pats games why do you care where
> they're located to the point where you're even willing to spend
> good money to keep them?
I've answered this several times. If they were in a dome down town which I
could get to by the T I'd go. I also said that I like having them around
because of the excitement created by having a local team.
And just to head you off before you take us around the loop again, no that
doesn't mean I don't believe you can support a team outside of town. It's just
more fun if your team is near by where you can go to the games.
George
|
9.4954 | | LEXSS1::MURPHY | | Thu Jan 30 1997 13:58 | 5 |
| You can get to Foxboro Stadium via the T...
Oops, there goes that excuse.
Dan
|
9.4955 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:09 | 13 |
|
But there's still the thing about the dome.
Also, commuting by Purple Line from Brighton involves 2 hours just coming
and going from home to South Station, never mind the train ride.
Bus to Kenmore, Greenline to Park, Red Line to South Station, Train to
Foxboro then freeze your BE-hind on a metal bench.
I'd rather take a shuttle from South Station to the Fan Pier area then
watch from a real seat under a dome at 68 degrees.
George
|
9.4956 | just say no do domes | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:19 | 13 |
| > But there's still the thing about the dome.
Domes are great for basketball, baseball, figger skating and UFC bouts.
They oughta be outlawed for the manly sport of football. No dome and no
steenkin astroturf or other variants.
BTW, what you describe, George, sounds a whole lot like the Georgia Dome.
You get on MARTA and head on over right into it. And it has the added
feature that almost no one shows so a fan can walk right up and buy
hisself a ticket.
TTom
|
9.4957 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:28 | 8 |
| I agree games under a dome are not as much fun to watch as games in an
open stadium on grass, but it gets too dam cold in New England to sit outside
during a football game once winter roles around.
Baseball, yes. Play it on grass but football on the carpet is no worse
than football on a frozen field while sitting in a frozen grandstand.
George
|
9.4958 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:30 | 9 |
|
It's only a 30-40 minute ride to Foxboro from town if you
really wanted to see a game. My guess is that George wouldn't
go to a game even if they were downtown because of his previously
stated fear of "drunken rowdies" which might be exacerbated
if they moved in-town. I tend to think the real reason he wants
a football team in the region is simply to be able to vicariously
share in the excitement that people who really support the team
feel.
|
9.4959 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:35 | 5 |
|
>> but it gets too dam cold in New England to sit outside
>> during a football game once winter roles around.
You don't go in September or October either.
|
9.4960 | bring on the cold | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:36 | 12 |
| > Baseball, yes. Play it on grass but football on the carpet is no worse
>than football on a frozen field while sitting in a frozen grandstand.
The same can be said of baseball when put this way.
For a minute, I thought that you might be getting ready to say that
football on carpet is no worse than on grass to which I vehemently
disagree.
As for the cold, I like it. Just drink some anti-freeze afore you go.
TTom
|
9.4961 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:45 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4958 by MSBCS::BIRDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> It's only a 30-40 minute ride to Foxboro from town if you
> really wanted to see a game.
That's a traffic jam I'd rather pass up.
> You don't go in September or October either.
If I have free time in September I go to Fenway and in October I'm watching
baseball playoffs. I like football but I like it next best after baseball. So
that leaves November and December. Figure one November home game you would have
to sit in pouring rain and by December it's pretty cold so that leaves maybe
one shot at a decent day to go to a game per year.
A Dome down town would give you a choice of 7-8 games and if they have larger
seating capacity you might even be able to buy a ticket.
George
|
9.4962 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 14:56 | 11 |
|
>> That's a traffic jam I'd rather pass up.
The comfort of your own automobile will be preferrable to the
cattle cars that you'd have to ride to a dome.
>> If I have free time in September I go to Fenway and in October
>> I'm watching baseball playoffs.
In 30 years the Sox have never had an away game on a Sunday.
Okey dokey. How much for that bridge you're selling?
|
9.4963 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 30 1997 15:23 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4962 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> In 30 years the Sox have never had an away game on a Sunday.
> Okey dokey. How much for that bridge you're selling?
Turns out you can watch the Red Sox away games. They are on this new fangle
invention called the Tele-Vision or some such thing. If'en I were you I'd go
out and get me one of them things. And even if the Sox are not playing there
are usually other interesting baseball games involving various pennant races
during September.
As for football I start watching as soon as the World Series ends. At that
point in time if I go I'd rather watch it in a Dome down town than in a cold
stadium out in the burbs. My preference. To which I have a right, I might add.
George
|
9.4964 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Thu Jan 30 1997 15:26 | 1 |
| Hey with a Domed stadium we could host the next Jackson 5 reunion tour...
|
9.4965 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 15:57 | 10 |
|
>> Turns out you can watch the Red Sox away games.
And I'm sure you've never missed even one. Sure.
And you're the type of pseudo-fan lobbying for a
downtown dome because once the Sox have finished
flopping for the 80th year in a row, you might
want to take in a football game. *Might* but
probably not.
|
9.4966 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:02 | 11 |
| Gripe, gripe, gripe, complain, complain, complain.
Hey, this is entertainment. Everyone's entitled to express an opinion as
to what they would like to see.
I'd rather have down town football in a dome. You'd rather have burb football
in a cow pasture. Everyone's got their preference.
Geez, you'd think we were talking about something important here.
George
|
9.4967 | | BIGQ::MCKAY | | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:11 | 6 |
| I don;t really care if they build a dome or an open air stadium, but
to put it in Boston is a mistake. Put it on the outskirts near
some major highways. Where they just put the Solomon pond mall would
have been great.
Jimbo
|
9.4968 | | CSC32::MACGREGOR | Colorado: the TRUE mid-west | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:50 | 19 |
|
>It's only a 30-40 minute ride to Foxboro from town
Just here for a hit and run 8^)
Let's see, it took me 45 minutes to go from Northeastern University
(one of the Green Lines) to near the end of the Red Line (where one of
the best bowling lanes was located).
Are you trying to say that you can get from the Museum of science (on
the Green Line) cross over to the Orange line using either the Red or
Blue lines while waiting for trains, get over to South Station so you
can catch a commuter train that runs once every two hours to catch a
game in Foxboro in 30-40 minutes?
Maybe we should legalize whatever you are smoking.
Marc
|
9.4969 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Thu Jan 30 1997 16:59 | 4 |
|
It's a 30-40 minute drive from Boston to Foxboro. George,
who I was talking to, knew what I meant. You, who I wasn't,
didn't.
|
9.4970 | Or a loaf, a jug and Patty | MKOTS3::BREEN | Sans Doute | Thu Jan 30 1997 17:13 | 8 |
| From Kenmore you could take the greenline to Baystate station and pick
up the train there. Or drive to Dedham, about 20 minutes on a Sunday
morning via J-way,vfw pkway. If you drive just follow washington st.
to the very end in So.Walpole and you're just about there.
Pack the pate de foie gras, the mussels and that Chateau de ?, your
Hamlisch records and have a little picnic prior to the game then slip
over to the Lafayette House after for more of the same.
|
9.4971 | | SALEM::LEVESQUE_T | Oh, yeah! The boy can PLAY! | Thu Jan 30 1997 22:18 | 11 |
| I don't like fake grass for any sport. So if they build any stadium, I
hope it's real grass. For baseball, one of those retractable flip tops
would be nice. I don't know why Toronto put in fake when they had the
opportunity to put in real grass.
An article in SI several years ago made the point that maintenance
costs for either were virtually equal. The article did go on to say
that many more, and more serious injuries occured on carpeted surfaces.
This more for football, of course. Blown knees, turf toes, etc.
Ted
|
9.4972 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Jan 31 1997 09:59 | 12 |
| > An article in SI several years ago made the point that maintenance
> costs for either were virtually equal. The article did go on to say
> that many more, and more serious injuries occured on carpeted surfaces.
> This more for football, of course. Blown knees, turf toes, etc.
Ted,
I'll have to put you in touch with that turf expert, George Young. George
claims that fake turf causes no more injuries than real turf. He's adamant
about that.
Then again, he's adamant that Dave Brown is an NFL caliber QB.....
|
9.4973 | keeping the faith | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:03 | 5 |
| >Then again, he's adamant that Dave Brown is an NFL caliber QB.....
So adamant he hires hisself a coach who swears by ol' Dave, too.
TTom
|
9.4974 | | CAM::WAY | and keep me steadfast | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:05 | 7 |
| | -< keeping the faith >-
|
|>Then again, he's adamant that Dave Brown is an NFL caliber QB.....
|
|So adamant he hires hisself a coach who swears by ol' Dave, too.
Oh yeah, you got dat right.
|
9.4975 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:52 | 5 |
|
It's a little ironic that Georgie wants to put the stadium
in Southie which might be the NIMBY capital of the world when
not all that long ago he himself was moaning about the impact
that BC football games had on his neighborhood.
|
9.4976 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:58 | 2 |
|
excuse my igonarance NIMBY????????????
|
9.4977 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Fri Jan 31 1997 10:58 | 22 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4975 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> It's a little ironic that Georgie wants to put the stadium
> in Southie which might be the NIMBY capital of the world when
> not all that long ago he himself was moaning about the impact
> that BC football games had on his neighborhood.
So Tommy, are you ready to admit yet that you essentially stuck your foot
in your mouth trying to make some sort of linkage between this debate and
the one which was going on? You know, the one having to do with whether or
not people should be prevented by tradition from rooting for teams not in
their geographical area.
It was in the middle of that debate that you started whining and crying
about how I shouldn't be allowed an opinion as to where the Patriots new
Stadium should go. Are you going to try again to make a connection between
those two arguments or have you completely tossed in that towel?
And if not, then just why did you bring all this up again?
George
|
9.4978 | | IMBETR::DUPREZ | A great face for radio... | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:05 | 5 |
| .excuse my igonarance
Again? :-)
NIMBY == Not In My Back Yard
|
9.4979 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:06 | 11 |
| >> So Tommy, are you ready to admit yet that you essentially
>> stuck your foot in your mouth trying to make some sort of
>> linkage between this debate and the one which was going on?
>> You know, the one having to do with whether or not people
>> should be prevented by tradition from rooting for teams not in
>> their geographical area.
If you'll go back and check you'll see that I have no problem
with folks cheering for a team not in their geographical area.
None at all. Being a Florida State football fan myself. Now
grab a towel and wipe that yoke off your puss.
|
9.4980 | | PECAD8::CHILDS | Steelers get a pants-down spanking | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:13 | 1 |
| thanks Roland.......
|
9.4981 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:27 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4979 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> If you'll go back and check you'll see that I have no problem
> with folks cheering for a team not in their geographical area.
> None at all. Being a Florida State football fan myself. Now
> grab a towel and wipe that yoke off your puss.
You did argue at one point that there was some sort of relationship between
me cheering for teams that had left town and me wanting a stadium down town.
I answered that by saying that while I do cheer for teams out of town I'd
prefer they were local. Then you seemed to back off that argument.
Now are you ready to agree that me cheering for teams like the Braves who
left the Boston area has nothing to do with me preferring to see my favorite
teams down town or do you still believe you have some sort of argument there?
George
|
9.4982 | NIMBY = Not In My Back Yard | RTOMS::SHERMANS | The former MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:40 | 9 |
| Well, you guys did quite a job this week, trying to turn the NFL topic into
the Junk Note. Tommy's .4940, about the relative merits of nudie bars and
domed stadiums on the cultural priority list, is already a leading candidate
for Note of the Year.
But this ongoing debate between George and Tommy is utterly pointless, as I
think George (at least) would agree.
Steve
|
9.4983 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:47 | 11 |
| >> I answered that by saying that while I do cheer for
>> teams out of town I'd prefer they were local.
So you could attend games. But you don't attend games now.
You then came up with severeal excuses none of which seemed
very valid. My only point is that you are the type of person
we have voting for the in town dome. Someone with the most
passing of interests in the Pats/Football who can't be bothered
to travel 30-40 minutes to see a game but might attend a game
if the stadsium were brought to you. For my money, no, you
should not have a vote.
|
9.4984 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | | Fri Jan 31 1997 11:49 | 8 |
|
Read in the paper yesterday that the Red Sox, were looking at the
same exact site as the Patriots for a new baseball stadium. I wouldn't
be surprised if they already have a back room deal with the Red Sox.
Where they give the Red Sox the site, in return the Sox give the city.
The land that Fenway Park is currently on.
Ron
|
9.4985 | | SALEM::DODA | Apparently a true story.... | Fri Jan 31 1997 12:04 | 6 |
| Except that Mumbles says he wants the Sox to build where Fenway
currently stands. No word from the genius on where they'd play
during construction.
Quite a mayor you got there.
|
9.4986 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Fri Jan 31 1997 12:22 | 5 |
|
I like it when Menino gets fiery (or passes for fiery from
him) about not building the stadium in South Boston as if
he's standing up for a principle (which he isn't) and not
cowing to political pressure (which he is).
|
9.4987 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Fri Jan 31 1997 12:40 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 9.4983 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "Bang! Bang! Bang!" >>>
> My only point is that you are the type of person
> we have voting for the in town dome. Someone with the most
> passing of interests in the Pats/Football who can't be bothered
> to travel 30-40 minutes to see a game but might attend a game
> if the stadsium were brought to you. For my money, no, you
> should not have a vote.
... and you made this "only point" in a debate about whether or not people
should be bound by tradition to support teams in their geographical area.
Logic has no place ...
George
|
9.4988 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | Bang! Bang! Bang! | Fri Jan 31 1997 12:53 | 5 |
| >> ... and you made this "only point" in a debate about whether or
>> not people should be bound by tradition to support teams in their
>> geographical area.
There was no debate.
|
9.4989 | | CLUSTA::MAIEWSKI | Braves, 1914 1957 1995 WS Champs | Fri Jan 31 1997 12:55 | 4 |
|
Fine, we all agree.
George
|
9.4990 | there is some news | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Fri Jan 31 1997 13:27 | 8 |
| Meanwhile, Jim Kelly just announced his retirement.
And Joe Bugel is the new head main at the Raiders.
And the Pro Bowl is Sunday with the new guys, Capers and Coughlin,
at the helm.
TTom
|
9.4991 | Pro Bowl rosters | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Fri Jan 31 1997 13:52 | 88 |
|
1997 Pro Bowl rosters
__________________________________________________________________________
(c) 1997 Copyright Nando.net
(c) 1997 Associated Press
(Jan 30, 1997 - 20:12 EST) -- The rosters for the 1997 NFL Pro Bowl,
to be played Sunday, Feb. 2 at Aloha Stadium in Honolulu (x-starter,
y-first-time Pro Bowl selection, z-injured, will not play; r-injury
replacement):
NFC
Offense
Wide Receivers: x-Jerry Rice, San Francisco; x-Herman Moore, Detroit;
y-Isaac Bruce, St. Louis; Cris Carter, Minnesota.
Tackles: x-Erik Williams, Dallas; x-William Roaf, New Orleans; Lomas
Brown, Arizona.
Guards: x-Larry Allen, Dallas; x-Randall McDaniel, Minnesota; Nate
Newton, Dallas.
Centers: x-Kevin Glover, Detroit; z-Ray Donaldson, Dallas; r-Frank
Winters, Green Bay.
Tight Ends: xy-Wesley Walls, Carolina; Keith Jackson, Green Bay.
Quarterbacks: x-Brett Favre, Green Bay; z-Troy Aikman, Dallas; r-Gus
Frerotte, Washington; z-Steve Young, San Francisco; r-Kerry Collins,
Carolina.
Running Backs: x-Barry Sanders, Detroit; xy-Terry Allen, Washington;
Ricky Watters, Philadelphia.
Fullback: Larry Centers, Arizona.
Defense
Ends: x-Reggie White, Green Bay; xy-Tony Tolbert, Dallas; William
Fuller, Philadelphia.
Interior Linemen: x-John Randle, Minnesota; xy-Bryant Young, San
Francisco; Eric Swann, Arizona.
Outside Linebackers: x-Kevin Greene, Carolina; xy-Lamar Lathon,
Carolina; Ken Harvey, Washington.
Inside Linebackers: x-Sam Mills, Carolina; Hardy Nickerson, Tampa Bay.
Cornerbacks: xz-Deion Sanders, Dallas; x-Aeneas Williams, Arizona;
Eric Davis, Carolina; Darrell Green, Washington.
Safeties: x-LeRoy Butler, Green Bay; x-Merton Hanks, San Francisco;
Darren Woodson, Dallas.
Specialists
Punter: y-Matt Turk, Washington.
Placekicker: y-John Kasay, Carolina.
Kick Return Specialist: y-Michael Bates, Carolina.
Special Teamer: y-Jim Schwantz, Dallas.
_________________________________________________________________
AFC
Offense
Wide Receivers: x-Carl Pickens, Cincinnati; xy-Tony Martin, San Diego;
Tim Brown, Oakland; y-Keenan McCardell, Jacksonville.
Tackles: xz-Gary Zimmerman, Denver; x-Bruce Armstrong, New England;
Richmond Webb, Miami; Tony Boselli, Jacksonville.
Guards: x-Bruce Matthews, Houston; x-Will Shields, Kansas City;
y-Ruben Brown, Buffalo.
Centers: x-Dermontti Dawson, Pittsburgh; Mark Stepnoski, Houston.
Tight Ends: x-Shannon Sharpe, Denver; Ben Coates, New England.
Quarterbacks: xz-John Elway, Denver; Drew Bledsoe, New England; r-Mark
Brunell, Jacksonville; y-Vinny Testaverde, Baltimore.
Running Backs: xy-Terrell Davis, Denver; x-Jerome Bettis, Pittsburgh;
Curtis Martin, New England.
Fullback: Kimble Anders, Kansas City.
Defense
Ends: x-Bruce Smith, Buffalo; xy-Alfred Williams; Denver; y-Michael
Sinclair, Seattle.
Interior Linemen: x-Cortez Kennedy, Seattle; x-Chester McGlockton,
Oakland; Michael Dean Perry, Denver.
Outside Linebackers: x-Derrick Thomas, Kansas City; xy-Chad Brown,
Pittsburgh; Bryce Paup, Buffalo.
Inside Linebackers: x-Junior Seau, San Diego; y-Levon Kirkland,
Pittsburgh.
Cornerbacks: xz-Dale Carter, Kansas City; xy-Ashley Ambrose,
Cincinnati; Rod Woodson, Pittsburgh; Terry McDaniel, Oakland.
Safeties: x-Carnell Lake, Pittsburgh; xz-Steve Atwater, Denver; Blaine
Bishop, Houston; Eric Turner, Baltimore.
Specialists
Punter: y-Chris Gardocki, Indianapolis.
Placekicker: y-Cary Blanchard, Indianapolis.
Kick Return Specialist: David Meggett, New England.
Special Teamer: y-John Henry Mills, Houston.
|
9.4992 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | NEW YORK YANKEES WORLD CHAMPS | Fri Jan 31 1997 14:11 | 3 |
|
Steve Wisniewski was Robbed!!!!
|
9.4993 | Gilbert Brown | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Sun Feb 02 1997 10:43 | 6 |
| TTom,
You can't have him!! Actually, I have read that the Pack
considers him to be perhaps their #1 priority.
Tony
|
9.4994 | or dream | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 10:25 | 6 |
| It goes without saying that the Pack will do whatever it can to keep ol'
Gilbert. Caint blame 'em a bit.
But I can wish, hope, etc....
TTom
|
9.4995 | AFC Free Agents | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:53 | 430 |
|
AFC free agents NFC free agents
Updated Jan. 30
The following lists were taken from SportsTicker. Official NFL
free-agent designations will be released by the NFL on Feb. 15.
_________________________________________________________________
Baltimore Ravens
Unrestricted free agents (12)
Randy Baldwin, RB
Jeff Blackshear, OL
Mike Caldwell, LB
Mike Croel, LB
Carwell Gardner, RB
Keith Goganious, LB
Eric Green, TE
Stevon Moore, S
Anthony Pleasant, DE
Ed Sutter, LB
Floyd Turner, WR
Jerrol Williams, LB
Exclusive rights free agents (10)
Vashone Adams, S
Donny Brady, CB
Dorian Brew, CB
Sedric Clark, DE
Dexter Daniels, LB
Corey Dowden, CB
Elliott Fortune, DT
Sale Isaia, DT
Quentin Neujahr, OL
Scott Otis, QB
Restricted free agents (2)
Frank Hartley, TE
Rick Lyle, DE
Transition free agents (1)
Steve Everitt, C
_________________________________________________________________
Buffalo Bills
Unrestricted free agents (4)
Russell Copeland, WR
Jim Kelly, QB
Chris Mohr, P
Steve Tasker, WR
Restricted free agents (7)
Rob Coons, TE
Lonnie Johnson, TE
Corbin Lacina, OL
Corey Louchiey, OL
Marlo Perry, LB
Sam Rogers, LB
David White, LB
Exclusive rights free agents (2)
Jerry Ostroski, OL
Tim Tindale, RB
_________________________________________________________________
Cincinnati Bengals
Unrestricted free agents (7)
Scott Brumfield, OL
Andre Collins, LB
Garrison Hearst, RB
Rod Jones, CB
Kevin Sargent, OL
Brett Wallerstedt, LB
Leonard Wheeler, S
Restricted free agents (5)
Jeff Cothran, RB
Darnay Scott, WR
Ramondo Stallings, DE
Kimo Von Oelhoffen, DT
Bracey Walker, S
Exclusive rights free agents (1)
Anthony Brown, OL
_________________________________________________________________
Denver Broncos
Unrestricted free agents (12)
Aaron Craver, RB
Tim Hauck, S
Rondell Jones, S
Mike Lodish, DT
Reggie McElroy, OL
Bill Musgrave, QB
Reggie Rivers, RB
Jeff Robinson, DE
Tom Rouen, P
T.J. Rubley, QB
Ralph Tamm, OL
Gary Zimmerman, OL
Transition free agents (1)
Shannon Sharpe, TE
Restricted free agents (3)
Allen Aldridge, LB
Keith Burns, LB
Maa Tanuvasa, DT
Exclusive rights free agents (4)
Dwayne Carswell, TE
Byron Chamberlain, OL
David Diaz-Infante, OL
Ernest Jones, DE
_________________________________________________________________
Houston Oilers
Unrestricted free agents (6)
Michael Barrow, LB
Blaine Bishop, S
Cris Dishman, CB
Brad Hopkins, OL
Steve Jackson, CB
John Mills, LB
Restricted free agents (3)
Malcolm Floyd, WR
Roderick Lewis, TE
Barron Wortham, LB
Exclusive rights free agents (7)
Lee Cole, CB
Josh Evans, DT
Lemanski Hall, LB
Melvin Hayes, OL
Lenoy Jones, LB
James McKeehan, TE
James Roberson, DE
_________________________________________________________________
Indianapolis Colts
Unrestricted free agents (6)
Ray Buchanan, CB
Eugene Daniel, CB
Richard Dent, DE
Kirk Lowdermilk, OL
Tony Siragusa, DT
Vince Workman, RB
Restricted free agents (6)
Aaron Bailey, WR
Brad Banta, TE
Jason Mathews, OL
Brian Stablein, WR
Damon Watts, CB
Bernard Whittington, DT
Exclusive rights free agents (6)
Clif Groce, RB
Paul Justin, QB
Steve Morrison, LB
Marcus Pollard, TE
Kipp Vickers, OL
Phil Yeboah-Kodie, OL
_________________________________________________________________
Jacksonville Jaguars
Unrestricted free agents (5)
Derek Brown, TE
Ben Coleman, OL
Paul Frase, DE
Ernie Logan, DE
Dave Thomas, CB
Restricted free agents (5)
Richard Griffith, TE
Ty Hallock, TE
Greg Huntington, OL
Willie Jackson, WR
Randy Jordan, RB
Exclusive rights free agents (13)
Brant Boyer, LB
Bucky Brooks, WR
Andre Davis, DT
Travis Davis, S
Nate Dingle, LB
Chris Griffin, TE
Mike Hollis, TE
Jeff Kopp, LB
Curtis Marsh, CB
Tom McManus, LB
Darren Studstill, S
Rick Tylski, OL
Jose White, LB
_________________________________________________________________
Kansas City Chiefs
Unrestricted free agents (7)
Louie Aguiar, P
Keith Cash, TE
Ricky Siglar, OL
Neil Smith, DE
Derrick Thomas, LB
Keith Traylor, DT
William White, S
Restricted free agents (3)
Donnell Bennett, RB
Lake Dawson, WR
Chris Penn, WR
Exclusive rights free agents (3)
Steve Matthews, QB
Tony Richardson, RB
J.J. Smith, RB
_________________________________________________________________
Miami Dolphins
Unrestricted free agents (10)
Randal Hill, WR
Dwight Hollier, LB
Tim Jacobs, CB
Bernie Kosar, QB
Louis Oliver, S
Bernie Parmalee, RB
Michael Stewart, S
Danny Stubbs, DE
Lamar Thomas, WR
Frank Wainwright, TE
Restricted free agents (2)
Brett Carolan, TE
Irving Spikes, RB
Exclusive rights free agents (1)
O.J. Brigance, LB
_________________________________________________________________
New England Patriots
Unrestricted free agents (13)
Troy Brown, WR
Todd Collins, LB
Mike Gisler, OL
Jerome Henderson, CB
Michael Jones, DE
Vernon Lewis, CB
Terry Ray, S
Ricky Reynolds, CB
David Richards, OL
William Roberts, OL
Dwayne Sabb, LB
Chris Slade, LB
Otis Smith, CB
Restricted free agents (5)
John Burke, TE
Ferric Collons, DE
Max Lane, OL
Marty Moore, LB
Larry Whigham, S
Option Free Agents (2)
Derrick Cullors, RB
Josh Heinrich, DE
Exclusive rights free agents (5)
Chad Eaton, DT
Hason Graham, WR
Rupert Grant, RB
Ray Lucas, CB
Lovett Purnell, TE
_________________________________________________________________
New York Jets
Unrestricted free agents (7)
David Alexander, OL
Harry Boatswain, OL
Matt Brock, DT
Mike Chalenski, DE
Mark Gunn, DE
Ron Moore, RB
Webster Slaughter, WR
Restricted free agents (3)
Aubrey Beavers, LB
Lou Benfatti, DT
Eric Zomalt, S
Exclusive rights free agents (9)
Henry Bailey, WR
Lance Brown, CB
Chad Cascadden, LB
Lou D'Agostino, DE
Tyrone Davis, WR
Bobby Hamilton, DE
Eddie Mason, LB
John Paci, QB
Don Silvestri, P
_________________________________________________________________
Oakland Raiders
Unrestricted free agents (7)
Paul Butcher, LB
Darren Carrington, S
Andrew Glover, TE
Kevin Gogan, OL
Michael Jones, LB
Richard Stephens, OL
Dan Turk, OL
Transition free agents (1)
Terry McDaniel, CB
Restricted free agents (1)
James Folston, LB
Exclusive rights free agents (3)
Cole Ford, K
Carl Kidd, CB
Kenny Shedd, WR
_________________________________________________________________
Pittsburgh Steelers
Unrestricted free agents (11)
Chad Brown, LB
Deon Figures, CB
Andre Hastings, WR
Jonathan Hayes, TE
Kevin Henry, DE
Bill Johnson, DE
Ernie Mills, WR
Ray Seals, DE
Mike Tomczak, QB
Willie Williams, CB
Rod Woodson, CB
Restricted free agents (4)
Myron Bell, S
Randy Fuller, CB
Jason Gildon, LB
Eric Ravotti, LB
Exclusive rights free agents (2)
Kirk Botkin, TE
Corey Holliday, WR
_________________________________________________________________
San Diego Chargers
Unrestricted free agents (11)
Lewis Bush, LB
Reuben Davis, DT
Darrien Gordon, CB
Dwayne Gordon, LB
Dwayne Harper, CB
Raylee Johnson, DE
Tony Martin, WR
Deems May, TE
Walter Reeves, TE
Leonard Russell, RB
Harry Swayne, OL
Restricted free agents (6)
Willie Clark, CB
Andre Coleman, WR
Isaac Davis, OL
Greg Engel, OL
Shannon Mitchell, TE
Vaughn Parker, OL
Exclusive rights free agents (12)
Arnold Ale, LB
Tony Berti, OL
Kevin Bouie, RB
Joe Cummings, LB
Vernon Edwards, DE
Omar Ellison, WR
Maurice Harrell, TE
David Hendrix, S
Mark Montreuil, CB
Troy Sinkiewicz, OL
Craig Whelihan, QB
Glen Young, LB
_________________________________________________________________
Seattle Seahawks
Unrestricted free agents (11)
Robert Blackmon, S
Ed Cunningham, OL
Stan Gelbaugh, QB
Carlton Gray, CB
Michael McCrary, DE
Glenn Montgomery, DT
Joe Nash, DT
Mike Pritchard, WR
Tyronne Stowe, LB
Ronnie Williams, TE
Terry Wooden, LB
Restricted free agents (3)
Kevin Mawae, OL
Lamar Smith, RB
Gino Torretta, QB
Exclusive rights free agents (9)
Mike Barber, OL
Frank Beede, OL
Coleman Bell, TE
Eddie Goines, WR
Oscar Gray, RB
Dou Innocent, RB
James Logan, RB
Todd Peterson, P
Patrick Riley, DE
|
9.4996 | NFC Free Agents | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:53 | 540 |
|
NFC free agents
Updated Jan. 30
The following lists were taken from SportsTicker. Official NFL
free-agent designations will be released by the NFL on Feb. 15.
_________________________________________________________________
Arizona Cardinals
Unrestricted free agents (15)
Michael Bankston, DE
Ronnie Bradford, CB
Kevin Butler, K
Wendell Carter, TE
Larry Centers, RB
Matt Darby, S
Mike Devlin, OL
Ernest Dye, OL
Anthony Edwards, WR
David Johnson, CB
Devon McDonald, LB
Rob Selby, OL
Joe Staysniak, OL
Bernard Wilson, DT
Joe Wolf, OL
Restricted free agents (5)
Marcus Dowdell, WR
LeShon Johnson, RB
J.J. McCleskey, CB
Brad Ottis, DT
Kendrick Redmon, OL
Exclusive rights free agents (9)
Tommy Bennett, S
Blaine Berger, DT
Ryan Christopherson, RB
Jerry Drake, DE
Kwamie Lassiter, S
Chad May, QB
Ronald McKinnon, LB
Johnny McWilliams, TE
Lance Scott, OL
_________________________________________________________________
Atlanta Falcons
Unrestricted free agents (22)
Lester Archambeau, DE
J.J. Birden, WR
David Brandon, LB
Brad Edwards, S
Moe Gardner, DT
Ron George, LB
Bobby Hebert, QB
Todd Kelly, DE
Harper LeBel, TE
Mitch Lyons, TE
W. Matthews, LB
Eric Metcalf, WR
Browning Nagle, QB
Nate Odomes, CB
Jeff Pahukoa, OL
Louis Riddick, S
Elbert Shelley, CB
Billy Joe Tolliver, QB
Darnell Walker, CB
Gene Williams, OL
Mike Zandofsky, OL
Jeff Zgonina, DT
Restricted free agents (3)
Bert Emanuel, WR
Lenny McGill, CB
Anthony Phillips, CB
Exclusive rights free agents (5)
Sean Boyd, S
Tyrone Brown, WR
Scott Fields, LB
Nate Miller, OL
Freddie Scott, WR
_________________________________________________________________
Carolina Panthers
Unrestricted free agents (19)
Carlton Bailey, LB
Myron Baker, LB
Duane Bickett, LB
Mark Carrier, WR
Bob Christian, RB
Matt Elliott, OL
Willie Green, WR
Howard Griffith, RB
Rocket Ismail, WR
Anthony Johnson, RB
Greg Kragen, DT
Steve Lofton, CB
Les Miller, DT
Sam Mills, LB
Mark Rodenhauser, OL
Rod Smith, CB
Rohn Stark, P
Dwight Stone, WR
Mark Thomas, DE
Vested free agent (1)
Chad Cota, S
Restricted free agents (2)
Ed Philion, DT
Walter Rasby, TE
Option Free Agents (2)
Toi Cook, CB
Brian Wiggins, WR
Exclusive rights free agents (8)
Jay Barker, QB
Matt Campbell, OL
Scott Greene, RB
Brandon Hayes, OL
Dino Philyaw, RB
Damon Pieri, S
Andre Royal, LB
Syii Tucker, TE
_________________________________________________________________
Chicago Bears
Unrestricted free agents (11)
Joe Cain, LB
Kerry Cash, TE
Albert Fontenot, DE
Jerry Fontenot, OL
Chris Gedney, TE
Keith Jennings, TE
Erik Kramer, QB
Dave Krieg, QB
Kevin Miniefield, CB
Vinson Smith, LB
Ryan Wetnight, TE
Transition free agents (1)
Donnell Woolford, CB
Restricted free agents (7)
Greg Briggs, S
Todd Burger, OL
Tony Carter, RB
Jim Flanigan, DT
Raymont Harris, RB
Shane Matthews, QB
Marcus Spears, OL
Exclusive rights free agents (8)
Clifton Abraham, CB
Mark Butterfield, QB
Rob Davis, DT
Dana Howard, LB
Dwayne Joseph, CB
Anthony Marshall, S
Bobby Neely, TE
Carl Reeves, DE
_________________________________________________________________
Dallas Cowboys
Unrestricted free agents (17)
Tyji Armstrong, TE
William Bates, S
Ray Childress, DT
Derrick Frazier, CB
Jason Garrett, QB
John Jett, P
Daryl Johnston, RB
Derek Kennard, OL
Brock Marion, S
Kelvin Martin, WR
Johnny Mitchell, TE
Godfrey Myles, LB
Darrin Smith, LB
George Teague, S
Broderick Thomas, DE
Herschel Walker, RB
Kevin Williams, WR
Restricted free agents (3)
Chris Boniol, K
Hurvin McCormack, DT
Jim Schwantz, LB
Exclusive rights free agents (4)
Billy Davis, WR
Wendell Davis, CB
Tony Hutson, OL
Dominique Ross, RB
_________________________________________________________________
Detroit Lions
Unrestricted free agents (14)
Bennie Blades, S
Shane Dronett, DT
Greg Jeffries, CB
Thomas Johnson, LB
Scott Kowalkowski, LB
Don Majkowski, QB
Aubrey Matthews, WR
Ryan McNeil, CB
Pete Metzelaars, TE
Scott Mitchell, QB
Zefross Moss, OL
Brett Perriman, WR
Robert Porcher, DE
Mark Royals, P
Restricted free agents (7)
Thomas Beer, LB
Shane Bonham, DT
Jocelyn Borgella, CB
Eric Lynch, RB
Van Malone, S
Tony Semple, OL
Mike Wells, DT
Exclusive rights free agents (10)
Chris Harrison, OL
Johnny Johnson, QB
Jeff Jones, OL
Miles Macik, WR
Derek Price, TE
Ronald Rice, S
Ron Rivers, RB
Eric Stocz, TE
Keith Washington, DE
Richard Woodley, CB
_________________________________________________________________
Green Bay Packers
Unrestricted free agents (11)
Don Beebe, WR
Gilbert Brown, DT
Rob Carpenter, WR
Jeff Dellenbach, OL
Desmond Howard, WR
Chris Jacke, K
Dwight Jones, DE
Doug Pederson, QB
Mike Prior, S
Wayne Simmons, LB
Frank Winters, OL
Option Free Agents (2)
Eric Matthews, WR
Bill Schroeder, WR
Restricted free agents (6)
Gary Brown, OL
Lamont Hollinquest, LB
Calvin Jones, RB
Dorsey Levens, RB
Terry Mickens, WR
Gabe Wilkins, DE
Exclusive rights free agents (2)
Matthew Dorsett, CB
Robert Kuberski, DT
_________________________________________________________________
Minnesota Vikings
Unrestricted free agents (18)
Jeff Brady, LB
Richard Brown, LB
Scott Dill, OL
Charles Evans, RB
David Frisch, TE
John Gerak, OL
Robert Goff, DE
Scottie Graham, RB
Martin Harrison, DE
Leroy Hoard, RB
Qadry Ismail, WR
Alfred Jackson, CB
Amp Lee, RB
Randall McDaniel, OL
Robert Smith, RB
Ariel Solomon, OL
Darryl Talley, LB
Sean Vanhorse, CB
Restricted free agents (6)
David Dixon, OL
Dave Garnett, LB
Robert Griffith, S
David Palmer, WR
Anthony Prior, CB
Fernando Smith, DE
Exclusive rights free agents (8)
Pete Bercich, LB
Mitch Berger, P
Greg DeLong, TE
Ben Hanks, LB
Chris Johnson, CB
Scott Sisson, K
James Stewart, RB
Jay Walker, QB
_________________________________________________________________
New Orleans Saints
Unrestricted free agents (9)
Derek Brown, RB
Paul Green, TE
Richard Harvey, LB
Tyrone Hughes, CB
Greg Jackson, S
Ed King, OL
Sean Lumpkin, S
Lorenzo Neal, RB
Klaus Wilmsmeyer, P
Restricted free agents (9)
Mario Bates, RB
Doug Brien, K
Ernest Dixon, LB
Brian Jones, LB
Craig Novitsky, OL
Doug Nussmeier, QB
Steve Rhem, WR
Austin Robbins, DT
Winfred Tubbs, LB
Exclusive rights free agents (6)
Israel Byrd, CB
Don Davis, LB
Michael Davis, RB
Lee Deramus, WR
Tony Johnson, TE
William Strong, CB
_________________________________________________________________
New York Giants
Unrestricted free agents (9)
Willie Beamon, CB
Scott Davis, OL
Lawrence Dawsey, WR
Maurice Douglass, S
Keith Hamilton, DT
Arthur Marshall, WR
Coleman Rudolph, DE
Adam Schreiber, OL
Lance Smith, OL
Restricted free agents (8)
Omar Douglas, WR
Gary Downs, RB
Keith Elias, RB
Brian Kozlowski, TE
Jerry Reynolds, OL
Jason Sehorn, CB
Stan White, QB
Tito Wooten, S
Exclusive rights free agents (8)
Kevin Alexander, WR
Jamal Duff, DE
Percy Ellsworth, S
Darnell Gilliard, DT
Bernard Holsey, DE
Ramon Okoli, DT
Brian Saxton, TE
Robert Walker, RB
_________________________________________________________________
Philadelphia Eagles
Unrestricted free agents (15)
Deral Boykin, S
Darion Conner, LB
William Fuller, DE
Lester Holmes, OL
Mark Ingram, WR
Jimmie Johnson, TE
Joseph Kelly, LB
Guy McIntyre, OL
Raleigh McKenzie, OL
Mark Rypien, QB
Mark Seay, WR
Johnny Thomas, CB
Adam Walker, RB
Ed West, TE
Calvin Williams, WR
Restricted free agents (6)
Terry Crews, DE
Ronnie Dixon, DT
James Fuller, S
Charlie Garner, RB
Joe Panos, OL
Marc Woodard, LB
Exclusive rights free agents (6)
Michael Samson, DT
Freddie Solomon, WR
Hollis Thomas, DT
Morris Unutoa, OL
Derrick Witherspoon, RB
Sylvester Wright, DE
_________________________________________________________________
St. Louis Rams
Unrestricted free agents (11)
Chuck Belin, OL
Torin Dorn, S
Cedric Figaro, LB
Leo Goeas, OL
Antonio Goss, LB
Harold Green, RB
James Harris, DE
Thomas Homco, LB
Chip Lohmiller, K
Greg Robinson, RB
Steve Walsh, QB
Restricted free agents (2)
Keith Crawford, CB
Keith Lyle, S
Exclusive rights free agents (8)
Paschall Davis, LB
Mike Gruttadauria, OL
Carlos Huerta, K
Jon Kirksey, DT
Herman O'Berry, CB
Troy Ridgley, DT
Jermaine Ross, WR
Billy Williams, WR
_________________________________________________________________
San Francisco 49ers
Unrestricted free agents (10)
Dennis Brown, DE
Chris Dalman, OL
Derrick Deese, OL
Elvis Grbac, QB
Steve Israel, CB
Rod Milstead, OL
Frank Pollack, OL
Nate Singleton, WR
Frankie Smith, CB
Steve Wallace, OL
Restricted free agents (6)
Tyronne Drakeford, CB
Anthony Lynn, RB
Kevin Mitchell, LB
Tony Peterson, LB
Ted Popson, TE
Jeff Wilkins, K
Exclusive rights free agents (6)
Daved Benefield, LB
Jeff Brohm, QB
Junior Bryant, DT
Mike Caldwell, WR
Tim Hanshaw, OL
Mike Salmon, S
_________________________________________________________________
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Unrestricted free agents (9)
Ian Beckles, OL
Demetrius Dubose, LB
Paul Gruber, OL
Courtney Hawkins, WR
Tyrone Legette, CB
Lonnie Marts, LB
Martin Mayhew, CB
Dave Moore, RB
Casey Weldon, QB
Restricted free agents (1)
Jim Pyne, OL
Exclusive rights free agents (2)
Tony Bouie, S
Jerry Ellison, RB
_________________________________________________________________
Washington Redskins
Unrestricted free agents (13)
Terry Allen, RB
Flipper Anderson, WR
Darryl Ashmore, OL
William Brooks, WR
Darrick Brownlow, LB
Sean Gilbert, DT
Darrell Green, CB
James Jenkins, TE
Trevor Matich, OL
Keith Taylor, S
Jeff Uhlenhake, OL
Matt Vanderbeek, LB
Stanley Woods, DE
Transition free agents (1)
Tom Carter, CB
Restricted free agents (7)
Romeo Bandison, DT
William Bell, RB
Gus Frerotte, QB
William Gaines, DT
Trent Green, QB
Darryl Morrison, S
Joe Patton, OL
Exclusive rights free agents (9)
Patrise Alexander, LB
Tomur Barnes, CB
Troy Barnett, DE
Scott Blanton, K
Alcides Catanho, LB
Ryan Kuehl, DT
Shar Pourdanesh, OL
Matt Reem, OL
Matt Turk, P
|
9.4997 | cap going up 700K | HBAHBA::HAAS | Come on down, Gilbert Brown | Wed Feb 12 1997 13:44 | 18 |
|
League reportedly to raise salary cap $700,000
The NFL salary cap will increase $700,000 to $41.4 million per team
when official figures are released by the league on Wednesday. An
unidentified source close to the NFL said that the amount for 1997 has
been computed. The increase is small but larger than the $200,000 per
team reported last week. The salary cap is the amount each NFL team is
permitted to spend on salaries and pro-rated bonuses for the entire
season. Most NFL player contracts are not guaranteed but signing
bonuses are included in the amount that counts against the cap. The
NFL has a hard cap, which means teams cannot go over the amount to
re-sign its own players or circumvent it with any sort of exceptions,
such as those in the salary cap used by the NBA. The initial report of
$200,000 was less than the minimum salary for free agents with five
years experience ($275,000). With an increase of $700,000, teams would
be able to sign two five-year free agents.
|
9.4998 | 97 NFL Schedule | HBAHBA::HAAS | angel trumpets and devil trombones | Fri Mar 28 1997 13:08 | 339 |
|
Complete 1997 NFL schedule (All times ET)
Week 1
Sunday, Aug. 31
Arizona at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Dallas at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Miami, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
Oakland at Houston, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
San Diego at New England, 1 p.m.
Jacksonville at Baltimore, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at Denver, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Jets at Seattle, 4 p.m.
San Francisco at Tampa Bay, 4 p.m.
Washington at Carolina, 8 p.m.
Monday, Sept. 1
Chicago at Green Bay, 9 p.m.
Week 2
Sunday, Sept. 7
Buffalo at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
Carolina at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
Houston at Miami, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Chicago, 1 p.m.
New England at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
San Diego at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Washington at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Denver at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Green Bay at Philadelphia, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Jacksonville, 4 p.m.
Dallas at Arizona, 8 p.m.
Monday, Sept. 8
Kansas City at Oakland, 9 p.m.
Week 3
Sunday, Sept. 14
Arizona at Washington, 1 p.m.
Baltimore at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
Buffalo at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Miami at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Oakland at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Carolina at San Diego, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
St. Louis at Denver, 4 p.m.
Seattle at Indianapolis, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Jets at New England, 8 p.m.
Monday, Sept. 15
Philadelphia at Dallas, 9 p.m.
(Open dates: Cincinnati, Houston, Jacksonville, Pittsburgh)
Week 4
Sunday, Sept. 21
Baltimore at Houston, 1 p.m.
Chicago at New England, 1 p.m.
Detroit at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at Carolina, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Oakland at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Cincinnati at Denver, 4 p.m.
Indianapolis at Buffalo, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at St. Louis, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Miami at Tampa Bay, 8 p.m.
Monday, Sept. 22
Pittsburgh at Jacksonville, 9 p.m.
(Open dates: Arizona, Dallas, Philadelphia, Washington)
Week 5
Sunday, Sept. 28
Arizona at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Denver at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Houston at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Jacksonville at Washington, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
Baltimore at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Chicago at Dallas, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Jets at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
St. Louis at Oakland, 4 p.m.
Seattle at Kansas City, 4 p.m.
Philadelphia at Minnesota, 8 p.m.
Monday, Sept. 29
San Francisco at Carolina, 9 p.m.
(Open dates: Buffalo, Indiananapolis, Miami, New England)
Week 6
Sunday, Oct. 5
Cincinnati at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Dallas at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at Miami, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Washington at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Houston at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Minnesota at Arizona, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Jets at Indianapolis, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Oakland, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at Chicago, 8 p.m.
Monday, Oct. 6
New England at Denver, 9 p.m.
(Open dates: Atlanta, Carolina, St. Louis, San Francisco)
Week 7
Sunday, Oct. 12
Atlanta at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Buffalo at New England, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Houston, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Miami at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Carolina at Minnesota, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Arizona, 4 p.m.
St. Louis at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Indianapolis at Pittsburgh, 8 p.m.
Monday, Oct. 13
Dallas at Washington, 9 p.m.
(Open dates: Baltimore, Denver, Kansas City, Oakland, San Diego, Seattle)
Week 8
Thursday, Oct. 16
San Diego at Kansas City, 8 p.m.
Sunday, Oct. 19
Arizona at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Carolina at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Jacksonville at Dallas, 1 p.m.
New England at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Seattle at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
Washington at Houston, 1 p.m.
Denver at Oakland, 4 p.m.
Miami at Baltimore, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Detroit, 4 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
Monday, Oct. 20
Buffalo at Indianapolis, 9 p.m.
(Open dates: Chicago, Green Bay, Minnesota, Tampa Bay)
Week 9
Sunday, Oct. 26
Baltimore at Washington, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
Dallas at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Denver at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Chicago at Miami, 4 p.m.
Houston at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Indianapolis at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Jacksonville at Pittsburgh, 4 p.m.
Oakland at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Atlanta at Carolina, 8 p.m.
Monday, Oct. 27
Green Bay at New England, 9 p.m.
(Open dates: Detroit, N.Y. Jets)
Week 10
Sunday, Nov. 2
Baltimore at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
Miami at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
New England at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Oakland at Carolina, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
San Diego at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Washington at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Dallas at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Jacksonville at Houston, 4 p.m.
Philadelphia at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Seattle at Denver, 4 p.m.
Detroit at Green Bay, 8 p.m.
Monday, Nov. 3
Pittsburgh at Kanasas City, 9 p.m.
(Open dates: New Orleans, N.Y. Giants)
Week 11
Sunday, Nov. 9
Arizona at Dallas, 1 p.m.
Chicago at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Washington, 1 p.m.
Kansas City at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
N.Y. Jets at Miami, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Carolina at Denver, 4 p.m.
New England at Buffalo, 4 p.m.
New Orleans at Oakland, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Houston, 4 p.m.
Seattle at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Baltimore at Pittsburgh, 8 p.m.
Monday, Nov. 10
San Francisco at Philadelphia, 9 p.m.
Week 12
Sunday, Nov. 16
Arizona at N.Y. Giants, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at St. Louis, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Denver at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Houston at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at Detroit, 1 p.m.
New England at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
Seattle at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Washington at Dallas, 1 p.m.
Carolina at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Jets at Chicago, 4 p.m.
Oakland at San Diego, 8 p.m.
Monday, Nov. 17
Buffalo at Miami, 9 p.m.
Week 13
Sunday, Nov. 23
Arizona at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
Buffalo at Houston, 1 p.m.
Dallas at Green Bay, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Detroit, 1 p.m.
Miami at New England, 1 p.m.
Minnesota at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Carolina at St. Louis, 4 p.m.
Jacksonville at Cincinnati, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at Seattle, 4 p.m.
San Diego at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Washington, 8 p.m.
Monday, Nov. 24
Oakland at Denver, 9 p.m.
Week 14
Thursday, Nov. 27
Chicago at Detroit, 12:30 p.m.
Houston at Dallas, 4 p.m.
Sunday, Nov. 30
Baltimore at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
Cincinnati at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at New England, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at Carolina, 1 p.m.
N.Y. Jets at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at Washington, 1 p.m.
San Francisco at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Seattle, 4 p.m.
Miami at Oakland, 4 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Tampa Bay at N.Y. Giants, 4 p.m.
Denver at San Diego, 8 p.m.
Monday, Dec. 1
Green Bay at Minnesota, 9 p.m.
Week 15
Thursday, Dec. 4
Houston at Cincinnati, 8 p.m.
Sunday, Dec. 7
Buffalo at Chicago, 1 p.m.
Denver at Pittsburgh, 1 p.m.
Green Bay at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
New England at Jacksonville, 1 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Philadelphia, 1 p.m.
Oakland at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
St. Louis at New Orleans, 1 p.m.
Seattle at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Indianapolis at N.Y. Jets, 4 p.m.
Minnesota at San Francisco, 4 p.m.
Washington at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Detroit at Miami, 8 p.m.
Monday, Dec. 8
Carolina at Dallas, 9 p.m.
Week 16
Saturday, Dec. 13
Washington at N.Y. Giants, 12:30 p.m.
Pittsburgh at New England, 4 p.m.
Sunday, Dec. 14
Dallas at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Detroit at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
Houston at Baltimore, 1 p.m.
Jacksonville at Buffalo, 1 p.m.
Miami at Indianapolis, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Atlanta, 1 p.m.
Tampa Bay at N.Y. Jets, 1 p.m.
Arizona at New Orleans, 4 p.m.
Green Bay at Carolina, 4 p.m.
Kansas City at San Diego, 4 p.m.
Seattle at Oakland, 4 p.m.
Chicago at St. Louis, 8 p.m.
Monday, Dec. 15
Denver at San Francisco, 9 p.m.
Week 17
Saturday, Dec. 20
Buffalo at Green Bay, 12:30 p.m.
St. Louis at Carolina, 4 p.m.
Sunday, Dec. 21
Baltimore at Cincinnati, 1 p.m.
Chicago at Tampa Bay, 1 p.m.
Indianapolis at Minnesota, 1 p.m.
New Orleans at Kansas City, 1 p.m.
N.Y. Giants at Dallas, 1 p.m.
Philadelphia at Washington, 1 p.m.
Pittsburgh at Houston, 1 p.m.
Atlanta at Arizona, 4 p.m.
Jacksonville at Oakland, 4 p.m.
N.Y. Jets at Detroit, 4 p.m.
San Diego at Denver, 4 p.m.
San Francisco at Seattle, 8 p.m.
Monday, Dec. 22
New England at Miami, 9 p.m.
Postseason
Saturday, Sunday, Dec. 27-28
Wild-card games
Saturday, Sunday, Jan. 3-4
Divisional playoffs
Sunday, Jan. 11
AFC and NFC championships
Sunday, Jan. 25
Super Bowl XXXII, Jack Murphy Stadium, San Diego
Sunday, Feb. 1
AFC-NFC Pro Bowl, Honolulu
|