T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1550.1 | New question | SALEM::DEAN | | Thu Aug 26 1993 10:49 | 5 |
| Well I guess there are no takers on the Tiger II. Lets ask a new
question. I'm looking for a low wing sports model that is easy to
build, won't take forever to build, and is stable in flight. I guess
you would call it an intermediate sports model. Any inputs?
|
1550.2 | try a Super Sportster | DNEAST::MALCOLM_BRUC | | Thu Aug 26 1993 11:11 | 6 |
| I would ook into the Super Sportster .40 I have a SS .20 with an OS .35
it looks nice and flies great. I'm sure you will get alot of different
entries on who likes what. There is a note on S.S. take a look and see.
Bruce.......................................Hey Evil, is the Gremlin
considered a low wing?? 8-)
|
1550.3 | | GAUSS::REITH | Jim 3D::Reith MLO1-2/c37 223-2021 | Thu Aug 26 1993 11:29 | 4 |
| Dennis has one 8^)
The other popular kit which flies like a dream is the Ultra Sport series.
I'm building a US60 right now and it is pretty straight forward building.
|
1550.4 | I SECOND THE ULTRA SPORT! | ELMAGO::RMOUSER | RON MOUSER, ABO/B3,552-2152 | Thu Aug 26 1993 13:07 | 14 |
| I say YES to the Ultra Sport also. There is a note on it also. I have
a 40 and a 60 size, that's how much I like them.
I also have a SIG 4 Star 40 that I am much more daring with (Sunday
afternoon type flying). It is a great quality kit and a good flyer.
I use the Ultra Sports for Pattern practice. They are not quite as
forgiving as the 4 Star, but if you have some low wing experience,
it makes you look like your skills just improved drastically. One
thing though, if you go Ultra Sport, put some real horsepower up front
so you can really use what it can do.
Good luck,
Ron
|
1550.5 | Tiger II Should Be Great | MKOTS3::MARRONE | | Thu Aug 26 1993 20:22 | 13 |
| Although I have no direct knowledge of the Tiger II, I did build its
predecessor, the Sky Tiger as my second trainer (ie, first low wing
trainer). I absolutely loved this airplane. It taught me a great deal
about handling a more docile airplane, and I learned many aerobatic
maneuvers with it. It served me well for two years, and after more
than 300 flights, I sold it to a fellow club member. It was still in
very good shape.
Therefore, if the Tiger II is anything like the original, its got to be
a winner. I'd go for it.
Good luck,
Joe
|
1550.6 | re:.5 | SALEM::DEAN | | Fri Aug 27 1993 10:55 | 2 |
| What size engine did you fly on the Sky Tiger?
|
1550.7 | Used OS46SF | MKOTS3::MARRONE | | Wed Sep 01 1993 13:56 | 9 |
| Re: -.1
I used an OS46SF on the Sky Tiger. Really pulled it along with
authority. My all-up weight was 6 1/2 pounds, so a 40 would have been
anemic. If you can keep the weight down between 5 and 6 pounds, you
could get by with a good 40, say an Enya 40 SS BB, which sells for
around $100.
-Joe
|
1550.8 | Sportair 40 | LEDS::WATT | | Tue Sep 07 1993 13:51 | 10 |
| Another good first low wing plane is the Sportair 40 by Northeast
Aerodynamics. It's easy to build and flys well. I never owned one but
I've flown them and seen many of them fly. I even saw a guy fly the
Advanced Pattern with one up in Maine.
I would also vote for the Super Sportster or the Ultrasport. You can't
beat Great Planes Kits.
Charlie
|
1550.9 | TIGER II OK but....some notes.. | CGOOA::MALONE | Pleasantly Obtuse | Thu Jul 14 1994 16:03 | 27 |
| I'm not even sure if anyone is around to read this...but
I just finished building a TIGER II. Excellent (typical) CG quality.
It will be taking it's initial taxiing and alignment set-ups this
weekend, with plans to fly it later in the week.
The kit does have some pitfalls however. It's real important to lay
out your radio installation during construction. Theres not much room
under the cockpit, and I had to do a lot of last minute reworking to
get everything to fit. In particular, the aileron servo sits overtop
the rudder/elevator/throttle servo...I'm using futaba s148 servos, and
everything colided real good. After much repositioning, trimming and
cutting, I got everything to fit, although I'm not happy with some of
my throws. I'll see how the test flight goes..if I need more throw on
the ailerons, I.m gonna have some problems. Also the CG can be a bit
tricky as they show the battery pack located under the tank. If you do
this, provide yourself an access hatch during construction. I ended up
placing the batter pack just behing the tank, resting in the spot
between my wing leading edge, and the receiver. My CG just works, but
not at the ultimate safe position. Since this is considered a second
level trainer, I think the ideal location for the CG would be as far
forward as possible...again I'll see what the test flight does.
Regards
Rod (it's certainly a good lookin plane, can't wait to point it at the
clouds.)
|
1550.10 | Servo placement is critical | CSC32::HAGERTY | Veni, Vedi, $Cmkrnli, Rebooti | Thu Jul 14 1994 16:09 | 7 |
| I agree with your assessment of the servo placement - I had to move
heaven and earth to get mine to fit. I also found the leading edge
sheeting to be a bit tenuous; It crushes much to easily. Given the
change to do it again, I would reinforce it in some way or use heftier
balsa.
Flies great, though.
|
1550.11 | Yep, its a tight squeeze, but flys great. | MKOTS3::MARRONE | | Thu Jul 14 1994 18:20 | 18 |
| If this is like the original SkyTiger, then I know how tight it is to
pack everything in. I used Airtronics 102 servos and was able to have
both an aileron AND flap servos mounted at the center of the wing, and
got it to fit...just. The Rx and battery were crunched into the most
forward portion of the compartment, and when the wing was bolted on,
they were _very_ tightly packed.
However, as you have said, this is a nice plane and it flies very well.
I put about 300 flights on mine before selling it, and sometimes wish I
still had it.
BTW, it looks cool on skiis for winter flying.
I think you'll love it once the building is done and it takes to the
air.
Regards,
Joe
|
1550.12 | Trimmed and Tested! | CGOOA::MALONE | Pleasantly Obtuse | Tue Aug 02 1994 13:48 | 29 |
| Finally!
Got the bugs out, made it's maiden l lfight yesterday. I don't
know what I was thinking saying I may have problems if I need more
aileron throw....this thing rolls unbelievably fast...I will be using
my dual-rates from now on. Take off and landing pattern went well, with
the occasional unintentional roll when I overcorrected...However no
major mishaps. UGH...LEE landing though. The flying field has two
resident Hawks that wait until your either not looking or landing
dead-stick...then they will pounce on you or your plane. Knowing this
and hearing them overhead made my landing a little hairy. I had just
gone deadstick(Problably due to overheat atmos. temp. very hot) lined
up on the runway, heard the hawk swooping within 6 inches of the top of
my head....distracted momentarily...too low to make the main runway...
...stretch the glide...nose in slightly to pick up speed...plane falls
into shrubbery....Just minor dents on leading edge...the balsa here has
been ACC'd, but it still is quite soft....I would recommend to anyone
building this kit to upgrade the balsa on the leading edge...anyway the
plane got a thourough checkout, no major damage, and I will be headin
out in the next day or two to do some real shake-down flights!
General synopsis.....Do not make this your first trainer...It
actually is a little on the hot side, with very little built in
recovery (ie dihedral etc.). On the other hand with a well tuned .40,
the sucker really screams and rolls are beautiful.
Regards
Rod
|
1550.13 | New Tiger 60 | SALEM::DEAN | | Mon Aug 15 1994 13:47 | 5 |
| Has anyone seen the new Tiger 60 form CG? Wonder if all they did was
increase the size of the wings?
Dennis
|