T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1332.1 | Which one? | N25480::FRIEDRICHS | Keep'm straight n level | Wed Jun 12 1991 09:56 | 3 |
| Is that Reading MA, Reading PA or Reading, England??
|
1332.2 | Sean's node is in the UK | ABACUS::RYDER | perpetually the bewildered beginner | Thu Jun 13 1991 06:49 | 3 |
| Sean should phone David Boddington or one of the other RC'ers in
Reading. He can find several by going through topic #4 with the SEARCH
command.
|
1332.3 | Slope or Flat? | NEWOA::WINSLADE | | Thu Jun 13 1991 12:06 | 9 |
| I take it from the phone directory that you're in Reading UK.
There's a field (actually the old Common) in Basingstoke that we use,
or alternatively there's a range of hills between Basingstoke and
Newbury that we use for slope soaring.
All of these are freely usable, with certain agreed limitations.
What kind of glider are we talking about?
Malcolm
|
1332.4 | UK gliders | REPAIR::MCMURRAN | | Mon Jun 17 1991 07:46 | 11 |
|
Sorry for the ambiguity...Its Sean from the UK (Reading England)
Thanks for the info.I have two RC gliders.Super Phoenix (thermal-9ft)
Scirocco (thermal 8.5ft)
I have managed to find somebody with their own winch line,and trying
to find a farmer in the area to use his field.Apart from the Reading
club,are there any others nearby?
Sean(UK)
|
1332.5 | Fleet club | KERNEL::ANTHONY | | Thu Jun 20 1991 18:41 | 13 |
|
Hi,
I am a member of the FLEET club, we have a glider site
near Farnham. I fly from the Fleet field, which is mainly
power, (some glider), the glider site has a power winch.
Mail me for membership details..
Cheers
Brian
|
1332.6 | The summers past... | SHIPS::HORNBY_T | | Sun Oct 06 1991 17:47 | 7 |
| Sean,
I know its a while back now, so I hope you're all fixed up, but
just in case your still looking. Thames Valley Silent Fliers are based
in Bracknel and Meon Valley soaring Association is based in South
Hants.
If you need any info give me a call. 782-2041.
Regards Trevor
|
1332.7 | Club near Henley,Oxfordshire sought. | REPAIR::TRIMMINGS | | Wed Oct 14 1992 09:07 | 7 |
| Does anyone know of a club near Henley-On-Thames,Oxfordshire.I am a
complete beginner interested in getting in to RC aircraft,and I would
think joining a club would be the best idea befor having a go
myself,right?
Tyrone
|
1332.8 | try BMFA | KERNEL::ANTHONY | | Thu Oct 15 1992 19:09 | 12 |
|
Hi,
I don't know of the clubs in the Henley area, but I suggest you
ring the BMFA and ask them.
Any decent club will be registered with the BMFA (British Model
Flying Association) you can contact them on 0533 440028
My club in Fleet, Hants, is probably a bit too far away...
Brian.
|
1332.9 | | REPAIR::TRIMMINGS | | Fri Oct 16 1992 03:46 | 5 |
| Thanks for the phone number Brian,I'll try it.I was told there was a
club in fleet,but I'm hopeing there's one closer.
Tyrone
|
1332.10 | Putting Ireland on the map... | GALVIA::ECULLEN | It will never fly, Wright ! | Fri Oct 16 1992 06:25 | 18 |
| Well, I might as well put this in here as my club is close to Reading
if you consider the distance to the US of A !
We are in Galway, in the west of Ireland, right on the coast. We have a
number of flying sites around the city that are easy to get to. So if
you are on a trip, pack the plane, and get in touch. We also have some
super gliding sites that are well worth going to. Even if you don't
bring a plane which would probably be very awkward to transport, get in
touch. I like to go out flying when ever the opportunity arises. We can
also get down to some good old Irish hospitality.
Even if any of you are somewhere in Ireland and have a weekend give me
a call - I would probably be able to travel to where you are located or
organise something.
Regards,
Eric.
|
1332.11 | | REPAIR::TRIMMINGS | | Fri Oct 16 1992 07:31 | 18 |
| Thanks for the invite Eric,knowing some of the countryside I've seen on
TV in Irland and what my freind has described to me,there must be some
fantastic places to fly.
I have phoned the BMFA and they are very kindly going to send me a
list of their clubs.
Just to fill you and Brian in,I have been going to get a RC plane for
about ten years!My dad has also been interested and he nearly got hold
of a spitfire the other day so I decided I would definatly get
something.I happened to be talking to a freind who has a glider,and
someone overheard me who had some stuff to sell.To cut a long story
short!I got a Sanwa conquest 6 ch radio with 4 servos,an Irvine 40 mkII
sport motor (6 1/2 cc),a Precedent Hi-boy R/C 4 ch Trainer (half
built),heat sealing tool& heat gun,model craft electric starter,a
flight line power panel (don't know exactly what this is for),all for
50 pounds.Sounded like a bargain to me.
Tyrone
|
1332.12 | I was there! | KERNEL::ANTHONY | | Thu Oct 22 1992 17:11 | 11 |
|
gee Eric, I was there in Galway the first week in October on laser
training. I was going to look you up, but due to the workload
on the course never got round to it.
Still the Guiness was superb, and the seafood at Morins (?) on
the weir even better.
Brian
|
1332.13 | I can recall some good days & nights at Morans ! | GALVIA::ECULLEN | It will never fly, Wright ! | Fri Oct 23 1992 05:45 | 7 |
| Next time .... That's a pity.
Glad you enjoyed the Guinness !
Regards,
Eric.
|
1332.14 | Anyone else heard this? | REPAIR::TRIMMINGS | | Mon Mar 08 1993 05:33 | 5 |
| I heard on BBC radio Oxford this morning that the CAA are trying to ban
R/C aircraft flying.
Tyrone
|
1332.15 | But WHy ?? | BLARRY::Bonnette | Rainbo::BONNETTE | Mon Mar 08 1993 10:18 | 5 |
|
What Is CAA and why would they be opposed to RC aircraft ??
Larry
|
1332.16 | 1/2 an answer. | CSTEAM::HENDERSON | Competition is Fun: Dtn 297-6180, MRO4 | Mon Mar 08 1993 12:56 | 1 |
| CAA = Civil Aviation Authority = to FAA in the USA.
|
1332.17 | why not ask for co-operation | REPAIR::TRIMMINGS | | Tue Mar 09 1993 02:46 | 13 |
| I didn't catch the reason the CAA gave,but a member of a club in
Oxfordshire said that what they proposed would mean limiting the
distance that R/C aircraft were from buildings and the person flying
it,also they would be limited in how high they could fly to 800 feet.
I must confess that the report wasn't up to a usual BBC report and just
as the report came on I started getting interference on my car
radio,that's why I wondered if anyone else knew about the report.
The one good thing I did catch from the report,there is a local MP who
supports the modellers,and he said the CAA should stop waisting money on
this matter and spend some money sorting out the near misses over the
UK.
Tyrone.
|
1332.18 | | SUBURB::MCDONALDA | Shockwave Rider | Tue Mar 09 1993 06:12 | 21 |
| I caught the last few seconds of the report on South Today, a couple of
weeks back. The R/C flyer was saying something like: I don't know what
the CAA are bleating about, this is a 'harmless' hobby and at half a
mile you can hardly see a normal R/C aircraft. Then there was a brief
closing about the local MP getting involved. It would be interesting to
see how the CAA are going to enforce this, if it ever came about.
Afterall, you're not supposed to fly kites above 2000 ft. Go to
Parliament hill on a weekend and see how many times this CAA rule is
broken.
BTW My neighbour is an ATC instructor for the CAA. His colourful
descriptions of the CAA management ranges from 'complete dorks' (that's
on a good day) to the unprintable and biologically impossible. In a
previous life, I took part in a bid to replace the ageing ATC computer,
with a modern fault-tolerant continuous running system which also had
collision detection software. The CAA informed us they did not need and
did not believe in collision detection software as their existing
system was perfectly capable. I think the ATC IBM crashed four times in
the week we recieved this reply.
Angus
|
1332.19 | Flying a Kite? | DV780::BEATTY | | Tue Mar 09 1993 11:35 | 8 |
| On a side note a few years back a 7 year old girl got pulled a few feet
off the ground and went for about a 100 yard ride across a field
holding a kite reel when the kite she was flying along the approach
path to San Jose Airport in California became ensnared by an
approaching light airplane. She was using 1/16" nylon rope. No harm
to child or airplane, the kite did not survive however.
Will
|
1332.20 | You better watch out, you better take care... | BAHTAT::EATON_N | Nigel Eaton | Fri Mar 12 1993 10:11 | 13 |
| A guy at my club mentioned this topic recently. We may have a problem....
The CAA are changing the rules on max height, and distance. One height figure I
heard mentioned was 400 FEET!
I'll report more when I get back to the UK, and can check up on this. Meantime,
please keep your ears to the ground.....
Why, every time I start a new hobby, does someone want to ban it?
Cheers
Nigel
|
1332.21 | CAA a few Facst and Gaps to fill | SHIPS::HORNBY_T | | Thu Mar 18 1993 18:54 | 82 |
| The CAA's proposals are very serious in terms of their impact to the Model
flying community and in particular to Competitive Thermal pilots.
I enclose parts of the statement and appeal published by BARCS in the Jan
93 issue of their news letter..
But first on a personal note... if any of you value the right to
continue as a flying modeller in the UK without these suggested strick
restrictions then please follow the recommendations. Further it
emphasises the point that we should fully support the recognised national
body for our hobby to give them more force and credibility in these
issues. Please join the BMFA or BARCS and make you views known.
Already the first set of proposals issued by the CAA have been
changed but still to an unacceptable level......
Back to the BARCS news letter..
------------------------Extract BARCS SOARER Jan 93----------------
BARCS now need every member to support the campaign against the CAA
proposals to limit the flying of model aircraft. The more people who
act now, the better our chances of achieving a change of attitude from
the CAA.
Background
Because of an airmiss incident in 1990 between a DC10 inbound to
Gatwick airport at 1500 feet and a powered model the CAA issued a set
of proposals in MARCH 1992:
* No model of any description to be flown without permission from
Air Trafic control within class A,D or E airspace (this means
about 12 miles radius from all major airports at ANY height)and
also 3 miles from any other operational airfield.
* Models below 2kg weight may be flown without restriction
outside the above areas
* Models between 2kg and 20kg may be flown outside the above
areas subject to :
o Not higher than 400 feet
o Not further away than 500 metres or visibility
whichever is te lesser.
BARCS responded vigorously to these proposals, agreeing that there
needs to be adequate provision around major airfields in the
interests of aircraft safety, but outside these areas, current CAA
restrictions were sufficient (i.e no restrictions on models up to
7kgs).....
..[back to Trev.. BARCS also through BMFA challenged many other
elements of the full proposal, As I'm sure did other bodies. It also
received press, radio and TV coverage although it never seemed to me
to have produced a balanced view, the uneducated masses being allowed
to draw the conclusion that we hobbists were big boys playing with
big toys which could constantly be putting the general public at
risk.. anyway back to the news letter which contionues with the next
update from the CAA]...
In November 1992, the CAA responded with a second consultative paper
containing...
* Class A,D and E restrictions as before;
* Other than A,D&E airspace only models below 1kg may be flown
without restriction;
* Other than A,D&E airspace, models between 1kg and 5kg must not
fly above 800feet, not further than visibility or 350m, not
within 20m of vehicle,vessel,structure or other person...
[Trev again, this should make the flight line a bit of a problem
particularly for landing and takeoff..]
* Aditionally, between 5Kg and 20kg, must not fly within 30m of
vehicle,..etc or within 350m of two or more houses or
buildings.
* above 20kg the current exemption process will apply
------------------------End of Extracts------------------------
The news letter went on to appeal to its membership towrite to
there MP providing them (us) with a framework and the names of all of
the country wide MP's.
I hope this has filled in a few gaps for you
Trevor.
|
1332.22 | Thanks (I Think ! 8^) ) | BAHTAT::EATON_N | Nigel Eaton | Fri Mar 26 1993 10:56 | 17 |
| Thanks Trevor!
Now I'm REALLY scared. I'll write to my MP (who's about as much use as a
chocolate fireguard), and see what happens. I'll also fire one off the the PM
(I have no comments here).
I know that my club is involved in discussions with BMFA, and I'll be keeping an
ear on these.
You're right, of course, about supporting national bodies. This seems to be
something the guys in the States are rather better at than us (or do I mis-read
the situation?).
Cheers
Nigel
|
1332.23 | CAA meets the Modellers | SHIPS::HORNBY_T | | Fri Apr 30 1993 14:13 | 16 |
| Nigel,
I don't have the full details but as a result of all these letters
to MP's two positive things have happened: there is now to be a 3rd
consultitive document and last month there was actually a meeting between
the CAA and members of the modelling community including BMFA, BARCS,
the Scotish model flying association and the LMFA (Large model assosciation)
Some (but not very much) headway has been made. We actually managed to
get a CAA rep to one of our BARCS contests.. The Sussex open on the
18th April, unfortunately the conditions were not good and we were not
able to provide a realistic view of the hobby.. however..
We now have to wait for the CAA's next paper which I believe is due in
September.
Regards Trevor
|