T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
464.2 | Go with it as it is! | MURPHY::ANKER | Anker Berg-Sonne | Mon Feb 08 1988 09:48 | 8 |
| Re:< Note 464.0 by TARKIN::HARTWELL "Dave Hartwell" >
I would not worry about a 1/8 inch on a trainer. For a
pattern ship I would. I have seen amazingly crooked aircraft fly
just fine. Alsom breaking up and regluing is likely to cause
other problems, such as horizontal alignment.
Anker
|
464.3 | AS THE BEATLES SAID, "LET IT BE"..... | MAUDIB::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Mon Feb 08 1988 10:00 | 12 |
| I agree with Anker, completely. Removing the stab will require
dynamite and you'd likely cause yer'self other problems in the bargain.
As Anker says, being off only 1/8" should cause no serious flight
problems whatever [I frankly doubt you'd feel any problem at all]
and this slight a misalignment [probably] can't even be seen.
If you feel you just have to fix it, use Dan's approach: either
add some stock to the lead edge of the side that's too far back or
sand a little off the side that's too far forward, then re-square
the trail edge perpendicular to the fuse centerline.
Adios, Al
|
464.4 | | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Mon Feb 08 1988 10:44 | 9 |
|
One last thought before we abandone a straight plane is to try a
heat gun. YES in most cases heat will liquify(sp) epoxy glue.
Careful heating of the epoxied area with a covering heat gun
might liquify(sp) the epoxy sufficiently to allow you to get the
stab off.
Tom
|
464.5 | Go with the majority and leave it on. | LEDS::WATT | | Mon Feb 08 1988 15:00 | 20 |
| I would go with the majority here and just leave it alone. Try
to get the fin straight if you have not attached it yet. This has
more impact on flight trimming than the stab being a little crooked.
On a high wing trainer, I don't think you'll notice. Next time,
give yourself time to set it up and mark it before glueing. Use
slow epoxy to allow some time for adjustment. Pin it and recheck
the allignment. I ususlly put a weight on the stab to keep it seated
on the saddle. I then check the height on both sides and the distance
from the tips to the fuse centerline before the glue sets up. I
also found an excellent way to measure long distances without the
usual problems of bowing or stretching. I use 30 guage wire wrap
wire tied to a pin on the fuse centerline near the nose. The stuff
is light and strong, so you can pull it tight and use it to guage
the distance to the two stab tips. I use this for getting the wing
straight also. Now I wish I could figure a way to set up large
planes that are too big to fit on my small bench. I don't have
any floors in my house that I trust to be flat enough.
Charlie
|
464.6 | Water Level | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Tue Feb 09 1988 07:07 | 16 |
| Charlie, If you can fit the plane on the bench to support it even
though you can get the entire plane over the bench there is a way
of measuring the stab, and wing realative to the bench. At any local
building contractor you should be able to purchase a water level.
I just happen to have one and have used it a number of times on
my house and on my planes. It's kind of a specialty item but I think
it will come in handy. What it is is a small bucket with a long
length of clear flexable tubing. You add colored water into the
pail and emerse the tube into the liquid to fill the tube. Set the
pail on the bench and with the open end of the tube you mark the
water level and the height above water level to the stab. With this
you can then measure the opposite end of the stab and adjust until
both sides measure the same.
Tom
|
464.7 | EXcellent Idea, Tom | LEDS::WATT | | Tue Feb 09 1988 13:41 | 9 |
| Tom,
I like it!! I have seen this used for construction, but I never
thought about measuring planes with it. I'll make something up
and give it a try. This should be a way to set up large planes
on an uneven surface. (My floors)
THanks,
Charlie
|
464.10 | down-thrust and ballooning | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Mon Mar 28 1988 11:42 | 17 |
|
Dan, Down thrust fights wing lift. Often a ship which needs
considerable down thrust to fly level will balloon when power is
reduced. This is because the thrust downward counteracting the
lift has been deleted and the forward velocity creates the added
lift to ballon the ship. You are seeing this in the wind because
you not only have the engine creating forward velocity but also
the velocity of the wind.
Q: Do you have to run any down elevator when the engine is running?
Q: What is the incedence reading of the wing?
Q: what in the incedence reading of the horizontal stab?
Tom
|
464.11 | setting down-thrust | MAUDIB::CASEYA | THE DESERT RAT (I-RC-AV8) | Mon Mar 28 1988 12:02 | 26 |
| Dan,
Au contraire, just the opposite. On flat-bottomed and/or high lift
winged ships, downthrust is used to _prevent_ rapid climb (ballooning)
under power. If yer' experiencing ballooning under power, my guess
is that you need _more_ downthrust, not less! This is especially
true on very light and/or lightly wing loaded birds.
Ballooning into the wind is common to virtually any/all aircraft
since airspeed is higher upwind than it is downwind, even though
_ground_ speed is lower. Therefore lift is higher when flying upwind.
This effect is _not_ related to, but is aggravated by, [lack of
adequate] downthrust.
What you need to do is keep adding downthrust [or reducing positive
wing incidence, or both] `til, on a calm day, no pitch change is
observed between power on, power off conditions. At this point,
ballooning in the wind can/should be dealt with using elevator trim
or by holding _slight_ down-stick when flying upwind.
:
| | 00 Adios, Al
|_|_| ( >o
| Z__(O_\_ (The Desert Rat)
|
464.12 | wing incidence set-up | SPKALI::THOMAS | | Mon Mar 28 1988 13:56 | 14 |
|
Dan, tell me how your measuring the wing incedence? if memory serves
me the Pilgram has a flat bottomed wing platform. here is my
suggestion.
Set the wing incedence up ( by experimenting) so that the ship needs
no up elevator when the engine is switched off and the plane is
in essence a glider. Once this is accomplished then adjust the engine
down thrush down until at full power no up or down elevator is required
for the ship to fly on the level. Done this way there should be
no need for an elevator trim change between engine on and engine
off.
Tom
|
464.8 | Alignment question | CHEFS::CONWAY | | Fri Jan 19 1990 04:02 | 17 |
| I am building my first Aerobatic model ( a WOT-4 ) having already
flown an Aileron trainer from the start.
Having fitted the fin/tailplane and rechecked the (uncovered) fuselage,
I have discovered a twist in the front end, forward of the wing seat.
In other words viewed from the front the wing and tailplane are
parallel, the fin at 90 degrees but the datum on the front bulkhead is
slightly skewed. If the datum is vertical then the difference in
hieght at the tailplane tips is about 1/2"
Hope all that makes sense.
My question is does this matter ? If it does, should I make any
( and what ) allowance in the remainder of the building or the
trimming.
Thanks in advance
|
464.9 | IMHO -- FWIW ( in my humble opinion for what | LASHAM::WARWICK_B | | Fri Jan 19 1990 05:43 | 32 |
|
Mr Conway ( is that Richard? ),
There are a lot of experts around this notesfile who, I am sure,
can give better advice than I but I am prone for some reason to
this sort of problem myself -- I wish I understood why!
From your description, your flying surfaces are all in alignment
with each other -- this is the most important thing.
I can't remember how wide the horiz stab is but 1/2" difference
tip to tip in relation to the firewall datum does not sound like
much to worry about.
Being something of a perfectionist I would normally cut the fuse
apart and re-glue -- of course this may not be too easy at the front
of the fuse -- I usually make the mistake at the rear -- the type
of glue used may also make a difference to how easy this is.
So my opinion is it will be OK but I would try to correct it if
practically possible.
I wait with bated breath to see if I get shot down by the more
knowledgeable of our colleagues.
Good luck
Brian
P.S. will you be able to make the meeting at Hampshire House on
the 31st?
|