[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

655.0. "Pseudo-etymology" by YIPPEE::LIRON () Tue Apr 18 1989 10:28

    This particular 'topic' is for any derivation which is totally wrong, 
    or at least extremely dubious.
    Please don't enter any real etymology here.

    Salut,  roger    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
655.1Phallus - AsphaltYIPPEE::LIRONTue Apr 18 1989 10:4316
    The city of Gomorrah is famous for sexual depravation, but as
    a difference with Sodom, we ignore the precise nature of the vices
    they practiced there. For more details, see topic 654. 

    One can reasonably assume that it involved some extensive usage
    of the phallic organ.
    We know that Gommorah later became a centre for the production of
    asphalt. I don't want to speculate about the reasons why they chose
    to produce asphalt rather than anything else, but clearly there
    must be some link between the 2 successive specialities of the city.

    At the moment we don't know all the technical details, but the
    existence of such a relation is clearly demonstrated by the obvious
    connection between the words PHALlus and asPHALt.
    
    roger
655.2It's a phallusyINBLUE::HALDANETypos to the TradeTue Apr 18 1989 13:309
        re:             <<< Note 655.1 by YIPPEE::LIRON >>>


	Roger,

	Why do you have to reduce everything to a phallusophical
	discussion?

	Delia
655.3actual pseudoderivationLESCOM::KALLISAnger&#039;s no replacement for reason.Tue Apr 18 1989 17:3116
    Re .1 (Roger):
    
    Error.
    
    >We know that Gommorah later became a centre for the production of
    >asphalt. I don't want to speculate about the reasons why they chose
    >to produce asphalt rather than anything else, but clearly there
    >must be some link between the 2 successive specialities of the city.
     
    Certainly, though "phallus" isn't part of the word.  "Asphalt"
    is phonetically equivalent to "ass fault," meaning an improper
    ultlization of the tokus.  
    
    See how simple these things are? 
    
    Steve Kallis, Jr.
655.4actual neopseudoderivationMARVIN::MACHINTue Apr 18 1989 17:505
    
    I thought the etymological smutticism derived from the pronunciation
    of asphault as 'ass felt'. No bawdiness intended.
    
    Richard.
655.5Ass fault, ass felt, asphaltULYSSE::LIRONTue Apr 18 1989 18:249
    re .3. .4
    
    Now I understand ! 
    
    Thanks, folks. They never teach you the pratical 
    language at school.
    I knew something would come out of all this.
    
     roger    
655.6Pour que tu puisses jouer :-)NEARLY::GOODENOUGHWed Apr 19 1989 12:327
    Moral:  It doesn't pay to be too subtle in a multi-lingual society.
    
    One for Roger:  "Cic�ron! C'est Poincar�!"
    
    If you don't get that one, I give up. :-) :-)
    
    Jeff.
655.7PASTIS::MONAHANhumanity is a trojan horseWed Apr 19 1989 12:4215
    	I think the idea is worth continuing, so...
    
    	As everyone knows, most of the fur articles labeled "rabbit" are
    actually based on pet cats, obtained from professional cat hunters who
    operate at midnight in Suburbia.
    
    	Now this hunting is not an easy job. The best pelts come from the
    most pampered and overfed pets, which are not interested in poisoned
    fish. A shotgun tends to wake up the owners, and even a bow and arrow
    tends to make a nasty hole in the pelt.
    
    	The solution was a Y shaped piece of wood, with elastic between two
    of the prongs. This, and a suitably sized stone, allows the
    cat-a-pelter to stun his victim at some distance without damage to the
    fur or noise. The derivation of the name of his weapon is obvious.
655.8Boston. The *real* story.IJSAPL::ELSENAARFractal of the universeWed Apr 19 1989 14:4027
Boston. An intriguing name, isn't it? Well, let me explain.

It's Dutch. As you all know, the Dutch were very active back in the days that
cities were founded in New England. Only our daily pastime here in Europe
(fighting the English, and losing every now and then ;-)) resulted in
anglicizing some of the names over there. New Amsterdam became New York, and New
England... well... {sigh} that's another story...

But Boston is our invention. The word is derived from the Dutch verb "barsten",
which means: "to burst", "to crack", "to split". There is a Dutch expression
(its use has become quite uncivilized now) saying "we gaan te barsten".
Literally, "we are going to burst", meaning "we will not survive".

This expression was used by the Dutch sailors when they were heading for Boston.
As you all know, there are lots of rocks and cliffs in the water before the
coast of Boston; it was very dangerous at that time to enter Boston's harbor. So
the Dutch spoke out loud what everybody was thinking. The anglophones
misunderstood, and thought they had given the name of "barsten" to that area;
and they started using it as such. "Boston"

By the way: knowing the real derivation of the word, you all now understand why
the Bostonians pronounce the name of their city as they do (something like
"Baaaah-ston"). It's equal to the pronunciation of the word "barsten" in one of
Holland's dialects....

Arie
655.9trainingLESCOM::KALLISAnger&#039;s no replacement for reason.Wed Apr 19 1989 15:1815
    In the earliest days, vehicles on tracks were pulled by horses.
    An inventor who didn't want to see equines pulling multiple cars
    announced his intention of developing a mechanism that would relieve
    them of the toil.
    
    A frontiersman visiting his shop asked him whether he was doing
    his development because he would make a lot of money from it.
    
    The inventor said, no; he was merely trying to make things easier
    for horses.
    
    "That's a loco motive," said the frontiersman, thus dubbing foreverr
    tha thing on a train furrthest from the caboose.
    
    Steve Kallis, Jr. 
655.10NEARLY::GOODENOUGHWed Apr 19 1989 18:448
    Re: .8  Arie, that's brilliant!  ��n pilsje voor jou.
    					^
    					(he wins a beer)
    
    Now I know why a smattering of Dutch helps to understand the
    Bostonians.
    
    Jeff (who can't think of anything at the moment)
655.11what about Boston in England?COMICS::DEMORGANRichard De Morgan, UK CSC/CSWed Apr 19 1989 19:058
    Re .8 - then how was the Boston in Lincolnshire, England named?
    If I recall, it is also a (small) port. The hostess in the TWA
    Ambassador lounge at Logan (Boston, USA) airport once told me that
    a sailor who was supposed to go to Boston, England, turned up at
    Boston, USA.
    
    BTW, there is a district in Lincolnshire called Holland ... they
    grow a lot of tulips there :-)
655.12Boston Spa England follows .....KAOFS::S_BROOKHere today and here again tomorrowWed Apr 19 1989 19:3726
    re .11
    
    That's easy ...

    The resemblance of the names of Boston Mass and Boston Lincs is
    purely co-incidental.
    
    Boston Lincs is a famous fishing port, known also as Boston Spa,
    the home of the British National Lending Library where they have
    just about every book ever printed.
    
    As you can see this town is good for both relaxation in the spas
    and for the availability of reading matter.  So, the fishing boat
    owners never go out on their boats, preferring instead to hire
    skippers as well as crews.  Out on the boats, during fishing seasons,
    all the workers were out in the boats, leaving their Bosses back
    in Town.  So all these fishermen referred to their town as the
    Bosses Town which in very short order was shortened to Bosstown
    and then Boston.
    
    Then to give the place some class, and trying to get tourists to
    visit, like most spa towns, they added Spa to the name.
    
    That is the derivation of Boston Spa, Lincolnshire.
    
    Stuart
655.13dirty wordsDEMOAX::MCKENDRYA Harmless DrudgeThu Apr 20 1989 00:1628
Guys,

 I work at a large customer, on-site, delivering custom software. During
the day I occasionally use a Kermit-like utility to dial out to a DEC
terminal server and log in and check my mail and if it's lunchtime I will
sometimes take the opportunity ro catch up on my recreational Noting.
Sometimes the people I report to here will stop by my cubicle and chat and
glance over my shoulder at what's going on on the Enet. I think that on
balance this is a good thing, given that I am really careful not to expose any
company-confidential stuff; they are really intrigued by the broad range
of information that gets shared so easily, the kind of thing we take for
granted here within DEC that is very foreign to many corporate cultures.

 So this afternoon I checked in to this Conference during a chat with the
woman who is monitoring my project and found myself exposing screen after
screen of lame jokes about phalluses, ass faults, and such pre-adolescent
coprolalia to her bemused inspection. The vagaries of local processor speed
being what they are, nothing short of turning off the terminal would clear
the display.

 Dirty jokes are for kids. Given the staggering rates these people pay for
my professional services, I do not want them to think that I work for a
company staffed by sniggering children.

 If you MUST get your jollies this way, please at least learn to include a
form feed in your text, O.K.? Thanks.

-John
655.14Notesfiles are for Digital Internal Use Only.PSTJTT::TABERIt offends my freakin&#039; dignityThu Apr 20 1989 14:506
Re: .13

Little enough retribution for your violation of company policy.  If you're
at a customer site stay out of the notesfiles.  

					>>>==>PStJTT
655.15Caught in the act eh ?KAOFS::S_BROOKHere today and here again tomorrowThu Apr 20 1989 15:5714
    Re .13
    
    If you chose to read these notes files, that's one thing.  If you
    read them on customers' sites that's another.  And if you read them
    when customers are looking over your shoulder then that is entirely
    your problem.
    
    For example ... If you like watching X movies and your wife catches
    you, is it the movie companies fault for making the movie ?
    
    If you want to read these notes .... read them IN PRIVATE ... if
    you dislike the content don't read this conference.  You can rest
    assured that if people step over the line, our moderators will
    deal appropriately with the matter.
655.16what ARE the rules re customers?COMICS::DEMORGANRichard De Morgan, UK CSC/CSThu Apr 20 1989 16:152
    I was informed by the moderator of one of the NOTESfiles that certain
    customers were officially allowed to use (some of) them.
655.17CourtesyDEMOAX::MCKENDRYA Harmless DrudgeThu Apr 20 1989 20:1425
 O.K., I didn't mean to spoil anyone's fun. Really. But I'm feeling a
little misunderstood myself.
 I'm fully aware of the policy about Internal Use Only and I don't think
I have violated it by reading Notes from a customer site. I don't give
out information. I don't read work-related conferences in the presence of
customers. We could easily argue the point, but I hope nobody wants to
make this an issue of Corporate Notes Policy, because every time the
Policy Police are asked to settle something like this it's bad news
for the Noting community.
 All I'm really asking for is a little common courtesy about off-color
postings. It could, after all, have been my wife or my mother or my kid
looking over my shoulder. And the dirty-movies analogy falls short in that
"Next Unseen" doesn't let me select what's going to show up on the screen;
it's as if all the movies at the local video store came in a black box
labelled "MOVIE".
 The Usenet has a convention whereby postings in questionable taste are
encoded in rot13 (rotate-13-characters) and can be decoded and read by
anyone who wants to do so. A simple form-feed and a sentence to the
effect of "low-grade humor follows<FF>:" is all I'm suggesting. And I
realize all the arguments about no-accounting-for-taste and
don't-tell-me-what-I-can't-say, and I'm not about to make up a list of
no-no words. But most of the people I hang around with have a sense of
when to lower their voices.

-John
655.18EAGLE1::EGGERSSoaring to new heightsThu Apr 20 1989 23:505
    Re: .17
    
    I agree.
    
    twe
655.19KAOFS::S_BROOKHere today and here again tomorrowFri Apr 21 1989 00:1022
    re .17
    
    While I am not disagreeing that maybe smuttiness is potentially
    offensive, one thing I suppose that we must all remember is that
    the acceptability of smutty humour does vary from society to society.
    
    Just watch Benny Hill (the unexpurgated version) You see it normally
    on UK TV, what we see in N. AM. is heavily censored and cut.
    
    My movie analogy is valid.  If you want to watch such movies you
    don't do it if there is a chance of your wife walking in.  If
    you want to read notes files, you don't do it if the customer is
    likely to walk in.  You don't read notes in the office if your boss
    is likely to walk in, do you ?

    What I was trying to say is that you cannot blame the notes if you
    are using them a little carelessly.  On the other hand, a little
    more respect and acceptance of the varying world-wide standards
    of noters would be a good idea by all of us.
    
    Stuart    

655.20Caveat lectorNEARLY::GOODENOUGHFri Apr 21 1989 13:048
    Regardless of whether there is a possibility of customers, wives, kids
    etc., getting sight of this or other notes files, there were probably
    quite a few Digital employees offended by the explicit terminology
    used.  I saw the potential humour in the innocent statement originally
    made, but at least I tried to be subtle about it, leaving readers to
    draw their own inferences.
    
    Jeff.
655.21more sweepings under the carpetMARVIN::MACHINFri Apr 21 1989 14:148
    
    Great. Let's get the mods to be more censorious, and while we're at it,
    let's take a closer look at the literature syllabus in our schools,
    newspapers that 'wives or kids' might read (!!!), and our own perhaps
    patronising, maybe sexist, or even misguided reactions.
    
    Richard.
    
655.22NEARLY::GOODENOUGHFri Apr 21 1989 14:449
    Re: .21  You should re-read my response.  I said nothing about
    externally-imposed censorship.  Read or write what you like, and
    I'll do the same.
    
    My use of 'wives' was merely as one class in a set of classes of reader
    that had already been used by others.  If you read me in context,
    you'll see that its use (by me) was not sexist or patronising.
    
    Jeff.
655.23Let's speak for ourselves and not imaginary peoplePSTJTT::TABERIt offends my freakin&#039; dignityFri Apr 21 1989 15:3415
"Wives and kids" don't buy it.  They're still a violation of the Internal Use
Only unless they are employees.  That employees might be offended is a valid
argument, but I don't think ANYTHING written so far in this file is as strong
as what can be found in TV, movies or on the street.  In fact, my casual verbal
reply to this issue would be much stronger than anything written so far.

I would say rather than defend hypothetical people we each stick to worrying
about ourselves.  If we personally are offended, then it's time to make the
decision to stand and fight or hit the NEXT/UNSEEN key.  Let the imagined take
care of themselves.

Like the case of Salman Rushdie, or Madonna's "Like a Prayer" video, we've
already endowed the note with far more attention that it ever waranted.

					>>>==>PStJTT
655.24Revenons � ces moutonsMARVIN::KNOWLESRunning old protocolFri Apr 21 1989 15:4417
    We all know about the link between -cens- words and burning - `incense'
    is an obvious example (I use the word `link' deliberately, but that's
    another story).
    
    The derivation of `censor' [and back-formations like `censure'] is
    therefore obvious. Someone who objected to - or was _incensed_ by -
    a book, burnt it.  Pope Adrian VII, feared by many a well-read
    cleric, was commonly referred to as Hadrianus Libricensor. There
    are libricensors in Bradford to this day.
    
    More recently, things other than books (plays, films, songs and so on)
    had to be consigned [there's another one: `ignis' meaning fire; see
    what I've got myself into] to the flames; so libricensor became
    plain `censor'.
    
    b
    
655.25shear simplicityLESCOM::KALLISAnger&#039;s no replacement for reason.Fri Apr 21 1989 18:5310
    An oar uses an oarlock as a fulcrum so that it has a point to rotate
    about when propelling a boat.  A two-bladed cutting instrument uses
    a common fulcrum for its back-and-forth strokinglike motion.  Since
    there is no separate bulkhead for each blade, the cutting tool was
    considered as something at a plane _within_ that of oars, and took
    the prefix "cis" (for "within") to name the implement "cis-oars."
    
    The evolution to "scissors" was but a simple step.
    
    Steve Kallis, Jr.
655.26Have I said this before?AYOV27::ISMITHThe fastest way is by Trism!Fri Apr 21 1989 19:185
    The word 'recursion' is a delightful example of self-referential
    evolution.  It derives from an older word, which was (of course)
    'recursion'.
    
    Ian.
655.27Uh-huh. And what's a"rebozo"?DEMOAX::MCKENDRYPride, Integrity, GutsFri Apr 21 1989 23:244
    Richard Nixon had a friend named Robert Abplanalp. More than one
    person has told me that "Abplanalp" means "from the flat Alps."
    
    -John
655.28a digression...WELMTS::HILLNo problem outlasts TNTTue Apr 25 1989 16:2827
    Re 13
    
    At the risk of causing further offense by having to nearly use the
    problem words, it seems to me you are in part a victim of the
    difference between 'proper' English and 'American' English.
    
    Thus, on the east side of the Atlantic an ass is a quadruped, hairy,
    mammal, not too dissimilar to a donkey.
    
    This in turn gives rise to the Limerick, which I found in a collection
    made by Isaac Asimov, (yes really), and is probably quoted elsewhere but
    which I'll paraphrase anyway...
                                               
	    There was a young girl from Madras,        
	    Who had the most beautiful ass,            
		It is not as you think,                    
	        Soft, ...., ...., and pink,                
	    But was grey, had long ears, and ate grass. 

    Meanwhile on the east side of the Atlantic the offensive (?) word is made
    by re-arranging the following letters:
                    
    		AERS
    
    Does this diminish your dilemma?
    
    Nick
655.29row row row your boat, gently down the streamLAMHRA::WHORLOW1:25000 - a magic numberWed Apr 26 1989 07:5316
    G'day,
    
    re .25
    
    In naval parlance, the oarlock may be referred to as
    
    'thole-pins', 'rowlock' (pronounced rollock) or simply 'crutch'
    
    depending on shape, action and style of boat.
    
    I wonder what cutting instrument might be derived from each of these
    ;-)  ??
    
    
    derek
    
655.30stating the obvious...IJSAPL::ELSENAARFractal of the universeThu Apr 27 1989 17:296
Another logical derivation.

"Diet" is a contraction of "die-eat", of course.

Arie
655.31Girl -to- GrabCOOKIE::DEVINEBob Devine, CXNThu Apr 27 1989 19:0321
    Once upon a time, there was a village where the wise-man would
    teach his craft to his son.  After a while, an enormous store
    of knowledge was accumulated.  Information about how to interpret
    the stars, to see when to plant, and to understand the old
    legends where all held by the current wise-man.
    
    In the course of the generations of wise men, a great one emerged.
    His name was Richard, or as everyone simply called him, Dick.
    There was only one dissappoint though -- he had no son to teach.
    He though long and hard on the matter and finally resolved that
    his son would be a book.  Not just any book, no, his son/book would
    be the ultimate compendium of all lore, teachings, and knowledge.
    Years of effort went into the production of "Harry" as the book
    was affectionately called.
    
    Though Dick's life was long and fruitful, eventually came the day
    of his death.  "Who shall we ask," called the villages, "now that
    our wise man is dead?"  Silence.  Finally a small voice suggested
    the answer: "We could look it up in the Dick's son Harry..."
    
    (dictionary     groan!)
655.32Apologies in advance...AYOV27::ISMITHThe fastest way is by Trism!Thu Apr 27 1989 19:3621
    Way back in the early days of motoring cars tended to be for the
    rich, the poor just making do with Shanks' pony (or not even that
    if Shanks happened to be using it).  The rich, as the term suggests,
    liked to buy expensive opulent luxurious extravagant cars, the better
    to impress the neighbours with.
    
    In the UK, Mr Rolls and Mr Royce had this market cornered.  Their
    cars couldn't be beaten for quality, style and image.  Herbert Austin,
    although a maker of smaller and less expensive vehicles, had always
    harboured a dream of building a car to see off the Rolls Royces.
    It was going to be the smoothest, the most expensive, the most
    powerful, in fact the absolute epitome of automotive engineering
    at the time.  He had decided that the car would have to be completely
    gold plated, with commemorative gold chains and medallions for the
    owners to wear whilst driving it.  Just so as not to keep anybody
    guessing, the price of the car would be displayed on the roof in
    flashing lights.  The name of the car? It was to be...
    
    
    
    The Austin Tatious.
655.33Eighture lunch?DDIF::CANTORThis is not all rock and roll, dude.Sat Apr 29 1989 00:405
Tenure, that employment condition that teachers enjoy after a sufficient
time on the job, comes from a corruption of the amount of time required:
ten years.   (Well, that's how long it was where I went to school.)

Dave C.