T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1237.1 | | MARVIN::RUSLING | Hastings Upper Layers | Wed Sep 26 1990 12:41 | 6 |
|
I've no idea why; how about the road being dangerous above those
speeds 'cos the surface has degraded or something to do with
wildlife preservation?
Dave
|
1237.2 | the council says ...... | CHEFS::OSBORNEC | | Wed Sep 26 1990 15:19 | 7 |
|
'cos the council says the road has broken up due to the hot summer.
I live 400yds off it, & it seems to me not significantly different to how
it's been for the past few years.
|
1237.3 | A smooth reply | SAC::JEPSON | Eschew Obfuscation | Thu Sep 27 1990 09:36 | 20 |
|
I rang up the council and enquired 'bout this ...
They claim that it was closed because the surface had melted in the
intense heat, and now that it's cooled-down all the grip has been
smoothed-out. The concern was when it gets damp/wet there will be a
2 mile skid pan!!
They wanted to close the road until Jan '91 when they have scheduled
some major road repairs but the congestion along Bearwood road etc.
meant they had to re-open the road. They have gone `over-the-top' on
speed limit so that no-one can claim they are being negligent if there
is a major accident as a result of the dangerous (their term) road
surface.
I'm informed by them that this speed-limit is enforcable and the boys
in blue may take an interest in it when the weather is poor.
Happy motoring !!!
|
1237.4 | | NEARLY::GOODENOUGH | | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:42 | 6 |
| > I'm informed by them that this speed-limit is enforcable
Well, if you've not seen the signs, then you'd have to ask. But if you
have, and they are in a red circle, then you shouldn't need to :-)
Jeff.
|
1237.5 | And there's another one... | XNOGOV::HELEN | | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:35 | 9 |
| Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmm....
They've done the same on the road from Ascot to the A30 ( the one which
comes out near Virginia Water) for what appears to be a very long
stretch, some of it may be warranted, but some of it seams rather
extreme, before it had no speacil restriction on it.....
Helen.
|
1237.6 | Cavalier days! | CRATE::SAXBY | Time to say something contentious! | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:39 | 7 |
|
Re .5
What a shame, that always used to be one of my favourite stretches of
road late at night and with no other cars on it! :^)
Mark
|
1237.7 | | SIEVAX::CORNE | Store in a horizontal position | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:39 | 8 |
| Have they just sprinkled new chips on the top? They did this to the A34
a few weeks back. Only took a few hours for all the chips to get into
the ditch (or windscreen!) but at least a week to remove the 20 MPH signs.
Why don't they roll them in properly as they did when I was a boy?
(I can guess the answer :-( )
Jc
|
1237.8 | No difference as far as I know | XNOGOV::HELEN | | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:51 | 10 |
| As far as I could tell there was no difference in the road surface -
I haven't driven it for a week or two, but the signs looked pretty
permanent to me when I was there - a few had actually sprung up
just to remind you on the nice bits....
It seams silly to think that you could loose your license if you
were doing over 40mph :-(
Helen.
|
1237.9 | Re .5 and .8 | IOSG::MARSHALL | Why can't a woman be more like a car? | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:38 | 15 |
| The section of A329 in question has steep banks each side which deposit mud on
the road every time it rains. They also help channel water onto the road. The
long dry summer would have caused a large dust build-up on the road, so as soon
as it rains this will get mixed with water and mud making a very slippery
surface. The road is very bendy, and people tend to drive rather fast along it,
so I presume the limit is to try and stop people taking mud-sodden bends rather
wider than they had intended.
But every time I drive down it, cars are still doing 40-50. I must admit I
thought the signs were a mistake when I first saw them...
Scott
PS Helen: do you live in Ascot? Do you commute to Reading? Do you want to
car-share?
|
1237.10 | Thanks | XNOGOV::HELEN | | Thu Sep 27 1990 17:38 | 8 |
| Thanks for the offer Scott,
Unfortunately I come up the A33 from Basingstoke most days, but
I still tend to go back to Egham sometimes to meet up with friends,
hence the use of the A329 and what used to be some fun driving....
Helen.
|
1237.11 | Digression. | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | Adios, amoeba _m_���_m_ | Thu Sep 27 1990 18:48 | 6 |
| � IOSG::MARSHALL "Why can't a woman be more like a car"
Do you mean like a company car - Reliable and changed every 2� years ?
M.C.Pig
|
1237.12 | | VOGON::ATWAL | Dreams, they complicate my life | Thu Sep 27 1990 18:49 | 4 |
| >> Do you mean like a company car - Reliable and changed every 2� years ?
and abused by your mates :-)
|
1237.13 | Digression | IOSG::MARSHALL | Why can't a woman be more like a car? | Fri Sep 28 1990 10:42 | 15 |
| Personal Name Etymology:
There are suggestions in various notesfiles that women find certain inanimate
objects more useful than men, so this is mainly for revenge.
Original phrase, spoken by Rex Harrison in film-whose name-I-can-never-remember:
"Why can't a woman be more like a man"
Personally, I wouldn't fancy a masculine girlfriend, so that idea doesn't
appeal. But I like cars, hence the adaptation. Interpretations range from the
innocent to the very smutty, and most are applicable ;-)
I'll leave the rest of you to compile your own lists of interpretations...
Scott
|
1237.14 | Keep them hidden 'til you have to use them ! | RUTILE::COX | It all comes ... from within ... | Fri Sep 28 1990 10:48 | 9 |
|
re .13
... and I always thought that last word was cagoule ;-)
Wasn't the film 'My fair lady' ?
nik.
|
1237.15 | Can I say this? | CRATE::SAXBY | Time to say something contentious! | Fri Sep 28 1990 10:49 | 9 |
|
My wife is not dissimilar to one of my cars...
Both are unpredictable and lots of fun!
Mark
|
1237.16 | Did her Panhard rod fall off last week too? | IOSG::MARSHALL | Why can't a woman be more like a car? | Fri Sep 28 1990 12:32 | 0 |
1237.17 | Should I be told? | CRATE::SAXBY | Time to say something contentious! | Fri Sep 28 1990 12:41 | 6 |
|
Funny you should say that.
The welder has been spending a lot of time with her recently! :^)
Mark
|
1237.18 | | JANUS::BARKER | Jeremy Barker - T&N/CBN Diag. Eng. - Reading, UK | Tue Oct 02 1990 14:47 | 12 |
| Re: .7
> Have they just sprinkled new chips on the top? They did this to the A34
> a few weeks back. Only took a few hours for all the chips to get into
> the ditch (or windscreen!) but at least a week to remove the 20 MPH signs.
The 20 MPH signs displayed then are solely an advisory speed limit. The
reason for them is twofold - firstly to reduce the number of flying stone
chips and secondly that fast vehicles can severely damage the new surface
before it gets fully bedded in.
jb
|
1237.19 | | SUBURB::PARKER | GISSAJOB | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:02 | 7 |
| Time was when roads were surfaced with tarmac, bedded in with a road
roller. Now they spray the old surface with thin tar, drop a few
chippings on it, leave some 20 MPH signs, and ****** off.
Ah, me. Nostalgia is not what it used to be.
Steve
|
1237.20 | Country ways | SWEEP::PREECE | I say, you chaps...! | Fri Oct 05 1990 11:03 | 18 |
|
A large proportion of the New Forest area is covered by a _blanket_
40mph speed limit.... and it's enforcable, too. It's been in effect since
early this year.
In practice, anywhere North of the A31, between Southampton and Ringwood
and one or two areas extending South are affected.
You get _one_ sign when you enter the restricted area, after
which you may or may not see reminders around and about.
The intention is to cut down on the number of car/animal collisions... and in
those there parts, the animals come big !!! (Deer, cows, horses, pigs..)
It seems to be working, and the local constabulary are enforcing the limit
enthusaistically.... on the principle that handing out tickets is better than
sorting out wrecks.
IanP
|
1237.21 | | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Fri Oct 05 1990 12:56 | 10 |
| I thought the law required reminders of "non standard" speed limits every so
many yards...
if so you'd probably have a valid defense against a speeding conviction (there
was a case in Lancashire a few years ago when a 40 sign was being repainted: the
sign was correct bu it stood on a grey pole, rather than a black and white
banded one, and the speeder got off as "the limit was not legally and accurately
posted")
/. Ian .\
|
1237.22 | The New Forest is littered with 40MPH repeater signs | JANUS::BARKER | Jeremy Barker - T&N/CBN Diag. Eng. - Reading, UK | Mon Oct 08 1990 14:33 | 23 |
| Re: .21
> I thought the law required reminders of "non standard" speed limits every so
> many yards...
That is correct. In the New Forest there are repeater signs, and it is
also painted on the road at certain intervals. (Out of interest, repeater
signs are specifically _not_ allowed in 30 MPH zones where there is street
lighting. Hence the "You are still in a 30 MPH zone" signs I saw earlier
this year near Rochdale.)
> if so you'd probably have a valid defense against a speeding conviction (there
> was a case in Lancashire a few years ago when a 40 sign was being repainted: the
> sign was correct bu it stood on a grey pole, rather than a black and white
> banded one, and the speeder got off as "the limit was not legally and accurately
> posted")
Let's get rid of this business about black and white banded poles. They
have not been required for any roadsigns for at least 20 years - grey has
been the standard colour for the poles since the current style of signage
was introduced in the 1960s.
jb
|
1237.23 | 30 MPH joke. | MACNAS::JDOOLEY | The Bucks of Oranmore | Thu Sep 12 1991 13:00 | 14 |
| This may be a bit late but it seems like a good place to put it.
In Galway our local council recently completed a 2-mile stretch of dual
carriage-way that by-passes a congested stretch of the Eastern approach
road.It was designed for speeds of up to 70 MPH and assisted with
European grants,so it is a very high quality job indeed.
The joke is that the council have put a 30 MPH speed limit on it!!!!
Another joke is that the remaining 4 miles to my home are single lane
and bendy and if you get stuck behind a slow-poke you're stuck there.
It has a general 55mph speed limit.
The joke is that where it is possible to do a decent speed the law
won't allow you and where it is often physically impossible to do 55mph
it is legally permissible!!
BTW NOBODY does less than 45mph on the dual-carriageway so the law is
being treated as a joke.
|