T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1141.1 | Surely they would need a brain for it to be dead | IOSG::MARSHALL | Harry Palmer | Mon Jul 09 1990 12:22 | 7 |
| Best alarm up to �50: Moss MS705 (�39.95)
Best alarm up to �100: Moss MS715 (�69.95)
Above that you get all sorts of whizzy bits which are probably more expensive
than they are worth...
Scott
|
1141.2 | | SUBURB::PARKER | | Mon Jul 09 1990 12:22 | 4 |
| Current WhatCar? magazine has an article. Let me know if you want
to look at mine.
Steve 7830 3401
|
1141.3 | An alarm on its own isn't much use | IOSG::MARSHALL | Harry Palmer | Mon Jul 09 1990 13:11 | 26 |
| An alarm, no matter how expensive and with what features, will not stop your
car being nicked. Having just bought an alarm and read all the installation
info, makes me realise that a "professional" thief could break into an alarmed
car and silence the alarm in about 15 seconds. It would then take maybe a
couple of minutes to sort out any "ignition immobilisation", hot wire the car
and drive away.
They are a deterrent only (albeit a useful one). If your car is parked where
people will notice the alarm (eg not the DEC park car park; how many people
would hear an alarm go off there?), a thief will prefer the unalarmed car next
to it. Otherwise it's useless.
I think mechanical means of securing a car (large steel steering locks, gear
lever and handbrake clamps, etc), are the best way to stop your car being driven
away.
Number plates etched on the windows are also good, as the thief then has the
cost of replacing the glass to consider.
On the other hand, if your car is more likely to be "borrowed" by joy-riders
than professional thieves, (as with the Moss and other cars with little
intrinsic value in the market place) an alarm would be a very effective
deterrent. It also stops those people who try to look a little closer than
they really should...
Scott
|
1141.4 | Halfords 0 AtoZ 2 | VANDAL::BOSLEY | | Mon Jul 09 1990 13:19 | 11 |
| I have a Moss MS715. Its very reliable. But as with .4 its only a
deterent from the causual thief. My only problem is that I have had to
order two new remote control units. Cases have split on both of my
orginals - The cost being �26 !!!!!! in total From the manufacture
direct.
Halfords - Brain dead (( YES )) I would see some one in Les Smith.
At least they look have human.. (( A to Z )) are reasonable for
comments. Cheap also..
Stu.
|
1141.5 | poor man's alarm ? | JUMBLY::DUNN | | Mon Jul 09 1990 14:12 | 8 |
|
can I get stickers that say the car is alarmed, even when it isn't ?
Where ?
My wife's car has had amateurs try to force the lock 3 times this year,
and her manager *still* won't pay for an alarm !
Peter
|
1141.6 | Immobilise the car! | IOSG::MITCHELL | Elaine | Mon Jul 09 1990 14:15 | 4 |
|
In my old Elf, if I was parking anywhere 'suspect' - I used to take
the rotor arm out, and take it with me! The door lock and ignition were
so worn, any key would have done!
|
1141.7 | | SUBURB::PARKER | | Mon Jul 09 1990 14:40 | 10 |
| Yes, you can get alarm stickers, dummy keyswitches, et al. Not much
point, IMHO, cos the tea leaves know where to get them too, and
what they look like. You can even get little flashing red lamps
to kid the light fingered fraternity that your non existent alarm
is armed!
Try any motor accessory shop (Halfords, Les Smith) or even B&Q -
I think I saw them in there.
Steve
|
1141.8 | Call in an expert... | CURRNT::PREECE | Hanging on in quiet desperation... | Mon Jul 09 1990 15:19 | 12 |
| While an alarm does not deter the professional thief from driving
your car away, a great deal of auto theft is by amateurs, who are
only after the contents (stereo, of whatever).
Krooklocks and the like a ren't going to stop them
If I'm going to be burgled, I'd much rather be 'done' by
professionals. They tend to be tidier, and do less damage.
Ian
|
1141.9 | Argos | IOSG::MARSHALL | Harry Palmer | Mon Jul 09 1990 15:21 | 1 |
| Argos has a range of "fake" security gadgets.
|
1141.10 | | VOGON::ATWAL | Dreams, they complicate my life | Mon Jul 09 1990 15:41 | 7 |
| saw a prog. tv that had an alarm that you could phone up (once you realise that
the cars been nicked, alarm would warn the
driver (aka thief) that it knows the car's being nicked & that he should stop
the car & run for it before the alarm shuts down the engine & imobilises the car
...art
|
1141.11 | krooked kroolock | COMICS::HWILLIAMS | | Mon Jul 09 1990 16:35 | 7 |
| When I was at college one of my friends used to work vacations at a
garage, and there was a mechanic who was an ex-car thief 'going
straight' but he still liked to have fun... he would go around
nicking peoples' krooklocks!!! he would then lock the car again and
leave all else untouched.
Huw.
|
1141.12 | Imobalise the thief not the car? | PUGH::FRENCHS | G6ZTZ and by | Tue Jul 10 1990 09:36 | 25 |
| A friend of mine came up with a novel method of car protection. The police were
also very interested but pointed out the legal implications. The specs follow.
Bulk head
| / / /
| / / /
+-> | / ^ / <--- Steering column
| / / /
| / / /
|/ / /
| / /
| ^/
|
|
+-- Very sharp pointed stake (wooden)
Underneith the stack was a gunpowder charge. When the alarm was armed, if
the vehicle was stolen thecharge would go off. This waould cause the stake to
shoot up the steering column thereby pinning the thief to the seat.
The first time he tried it (in an old scrap car) the stake shoot through the
roof).
Simon
|
1141.13 | A New Hammer Movie Plot? | IOSG::MARSHALL | Harry Palmer | Tue Jul 10 1990 09:58 | 9 |
| I thought vampires stole glamourous virgins, not cars?
How about a furry crucifix hanging from the rear view mirror?
Or a "Pope Costume" Garfield in the back window?
Any other ideas for making your car vampire proof...?
Scott
|
1141.14 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs & some nuts | Tue Jul 10 1990 11:19 | 14 |
| RE: .12>
A few years ago the MG Car Club put out a warning about the legal
implications of car anti-theft devices.
One of the members had fitted a hidden switch to the electric fuel
pump of his MGB. A budding car thief had got in one night, and
started the car. There was enough fuel in the carbs to get him to
the nearest main road, but the engine died as he was pulling out
into the path of an oncoming lorry.
Not only did the unfortunate owner get his his car wrecked, but he
was prosecuted and held to be responsible for the accident.
Ian.
|
1141.15 | ? | OVAL::KERRELLD | Give me R�sti | Tue Jul 10 1990 12:57 | 11 |
| re.-1
I can't imagine the legal arguments that could be used to blame a person,
who had fitted a fuel cutoff switch, for an accident resulting from a thief
not knowing how to operate the car! Fuel cutoff switchs are not unknown
safety devices to prevent fires after an accident.
Also, how come the carbs had enough fuel for anything other than start for a
few seconds?
Dave.
|
1141.16 | Block ignition instead of fuel | HOO78C::DUINHOVEN | Dutch treat | Tue Jul 10 1990 13:11 | 10 |
| I have a Cobra alarm device and will intsall this on the MG B GT
when it is roadworthy again and this device does not shut the
fuel, but interrupts the low tension part of the ignition coil.
The alarm switch has double functionality:
1 - Put on the alarm system (including doppler efect interiorsensor)
2 - Interrupt the low tension part of the ignition.
Works perfectly!
Hans
|
1141.17 | | FORTY2::QUICK | Trust me, I know what I'm doing. | Tue Jul 10 1990 13:21 | 27 |
|
I paid the car radio place down near Zenith to fit a Scorpion
alarm system to my car a couple of years ago (�250)...
It was a remote control on the central locking type, and I foolishly
assumed that meant I could leave the key in the car and just carry
the control unit.
It locked me out of the car while it was on double yellow lines; the
spare keys were in my mother's handbag in Devon, the main key was of
course in the ignition. A traffic warden broke into the car for me
with a piece of plastic packing case strip, it took about 30 seconds.
Not one passer-by even looked up, even though the alarm had been set
off when the door was opened.
I then stupidly decided to test the remote control unit while I was
inside the car, in Sainsbury's car park. It locked the doors, then
refused to unlock them. When I manually unlocked them, the alarm of
course went off, I had to open the bonnet and disable it. Bearing in
mind that this was a crowded car park, the car was a newish Range
Rover, and I was dressed in my Saturday best jeans & t-shirt and was
under the bonnet frantically trying to stop a 120-db alarm screaming
it's head off, it's suprising no-one said anything, but no-one did.
If you ask me, they're a complete waste of money.
Jonathan.
|
1141.18 | Never a Policeman when you want one? :-) | IOSG::MITCHELL | Elaine | Tue Jul 10 1990 13:55 | 13 |
|
I agree with .17 - how often does anyone take any notice of car alarms,
maybe when only a few cars had them, but now, people are so used to
hearing them, and assuming that it's been set off accidently, that
no-one does anything.
Have you ever challenged anyone doing anything 'suspicious'?
We once did, and after a moments surprise, the person trying to break
into a car explained that he'd locked his keys in, and showed us some
ID, he then thanked us for showing concern. Don't know what would have
happened if he was a car thief - probably bluffed it out, and we'd
still have gone away feeling we'd done our good deed for the day.....
|
1141.19 | Are all Fords getting alarms ? | COMICS::SHELLEYR | Roy Shelley UK TSC | Tue Jul 10 1990 14:14 | 12 |
| Talking about car alarms, has anyone seen vtx fleetnews "burglar
alarms" where it mentions "Ford motor co. are now fitting
Burglar alarms as standard on all their vehicles."
Does this really mean what it says? I would of thought there would be a
lot of press about it as they would be the first manufacturer to do
this !
Maybe it just means the leasing companies are getting alarms fitted to
fords that are supplied to DEC.
Roy
|
1141.20 | Liverpool anit-theft device | BAHTAT::HILTON | Two in the box ready to go | Tue Jul 10 1990 14:35 | 17 |
| Did you hear the one about the police in Liverpool?
They had this fantastic way of catching car thieves....
They had a secure car with hardened glass windows etc. It was generally
a decent car, they then parked it where it was bound to be nicked. When
Mr Thief picks the lock, and get's in,then all doors lock and an alarm
is set off in the police station. Mr Plod rolls up and one thief is
sat in his locked car, trapped.
I heard from some friends that it was very successful but had to be
abandoned because it was an infringement of human rights, and humans
should not be trapped like rats!!
I thought it was a great ides!
Greg
|
1141.21 | | SHAPES::BUCKLEYC | Bareback on the Shark | Tue Jul 10 1990 14:46 | 8 |
|
RE -1
I read about this in Auto Express. As far as I can remember the Police
are allowed to leave the car locked. The hoorah was over leaving
it unlocked, as this could be classed as enticement which is a no-no.
Chris
|
1141.22 | | COMICS::WEGG | Some hard boiled eggs & some nuts | Tue Jul 10 1990 15:09 | 18 |
| Re .19> All Ford's now have burglar alarms.
I had a Sierra Saphire as a hire car a few weeks ago, and that had
a crude alarm fitted. Though were no stickers on the car
indicating the fact, and there was nothing in the docs to tell you
how it worked. It was there, all right!
Whilst parked in a busy high street, the damned thing went off
wehn I opened the door to get in. I assumed that it would stop
when I put the key in the ignition, but it didn't. The only way I
could silence it was to get out, lock the car and unlock it again.
BTW, the sound it made was a regular 'hoot' of the horn, not the
usualy electronic wail of most alarms I've heard. The horn would
also beep once whenever you locked the door - a bit inconvenient
in the early hours of the morning.
Ian.
|
1141.23 | F.A. Law ! | EFGV04::MUDAN_J | Yours Grate Fully ? | Tue Jul 10 1990 15:23 | 9 |
|
.14 & .15,
RE: Fuel Cut-Off Switches and Car Conking Out On Thief...
That reminds me, I must fill up the car tonight so that it has enough
fuel for a clean 'Get Away'. One would'nt want the poor bugger to conk
out in front of a lorry. Would one ? ;-}
|
1141.24 | Phone home... | RUTILE::SMITH_A | No-one puts baby in the corner | Tue Jul 10 1990 15:29 | 17 |
| Does anyone know....
... I remember reading an article about the car that tells you it's
been nicked.
Apparently it was a system on offer to prestige-car owners when
they had their cell-phone installed. In effect the car had no outward
signs that it was protected, no flashing lights or horns, just a
phone call to a pager that the owner carried - "Hello, i've just
been nicked" sort of thing. The idea was that the owner then contacts
police, police look for car, arrest anyone found driving it.
Anyone else see this, or know if it got off the ground. Or was it
all a dream ?
AMS
|
1141.25 | Not a dream. | IOSG::MARSHALL | Harry Palmer | Tue Jul 10 1990 16:24 | 15 |
| There are several systems like the one you describe. My fave is the one where
when the car is nicked, it sends out a continuous radio signal.
A number of road-side sensors detect this, and triangulate to get the position
of the car, which is relayed to a control centre. Someone at the centre then
'phones the police, and tells them the car has been nicked, where it is and
where it is going!
There's also the one where after a car is nicked, a voice synthesiser in the
alarm tells the thief to stop and park the car as all fuel, electric, etc
systems will be disabled in one minute...
Why it doesn't disable them before the thief starts it is beyond me...
Scott
|
1141.26 | they deter radio theives... | CUCKOO::SPENCER | | Tue Jul 10 1990 16:25 | 5 |
| Where I park my car outside the flat all four *new* cars were broken into and
their radios removed, mine however had an alarm an wasn't touched - saved me
what it cost already 8*).
Nigel.
|
1141.27 | They sound better with a bit of echo... | IJSAPL::CAMERON | Studying fluid dynamics, from a stein | Wed Jul 11 1990 08:11 | 12 |
| I have an alarm supplied by Nissan, but of indeterminate manufacture.
It's a remote control type, with a howling banshee under the bonnet and
a cut off to the fuel pump if it's not disabled. The fuel cutoff is
particularly effective as the engine won't even start.
As for people taking notice of car alarms, well they did when I set mine
by off by mistake on Deck 5 of the Hook - Harwich ferry. The guy in the
next car spilled about half a can of coke he was drinking down his
trousers when the it went off !
Gordon
|
1141.28 | | CHEST::BURRELL | Live long/prosper-live short/enjoy | Wed Jul 11 1990 11:20 | 9 |
|
I always wanted to rig my car upto the mains and then watch somebody
try to nick it!
Unfortunately I was informed by a friend in the Police Force that it
was slightly illegal - Oh well one call always dream!
Paul.
|
1141.29 | Give 'em amps in their pants! | PEKING::HASTONM | Emm | Wed Jul 11 1990 13:12 | 7 |
| I prefer the system I saw on TV where you divert the car battery
into the drivers seat for a few seconds if the alarm isn't disarmed.
The results on TV were *most* effective.
As for the `legality' - I can't see a crimm shopping himself to
report he got a scorched @#$ trying to nick a motor.
M
|
1141.30 | I'll just demonstrate this new alaaaarrmmmm !! | IJSAPL::CAMERON | Studying fluid dynamics, from a stein | Wed Jul 11 1990 13:17 | 5 |
| > The results on TV were *most* effective.
Did they actually get a volunteer for this ?!!
Gordon
|
1141.31 | Must have been a Voltswagen | SIOG::OHEARCAIN | | Tue Jul 17 1990 15:41 | 7 |
|
> 'amps in pants' from car battery.
Thought most car batteries were in the 12V - 14V range. Maybe
Ohm's Law doesn't apply to car interiors ?!
N.
|
1141.32 | need instalation | JUPITR::POWELL | | Thu Aug 02 1990 11:12 | 5 |
| if you do purchase an alarm and need it installed d.a.p. mobile
installations does exelent work and gives a life time garente the #
is (508)852-0921
powell
|
1141.33 | Guarantee? | IOSG::MARSHALL | Harry Palmer | Thu Aug 02 1990 11:58 | 1 |
| Lifetime guarantee against what? That your car will never be stolen? ;-)
|
1141.34 | Fit it somewhere silly | KURMA::DMCGREGOR | | Fri Aug 03 1990 15:20 | 6 |
|
The problem with professionally fitted car alarms is that professional
car thiefs know exactly where professional alarm fitters fit them and
subsequently can do an extremely professional job of removing them.I
know this to my cost!I`ll be alarming my new car myself.
Dougie
|
1141.35 | | NEWOA::BAILEY | pink Cadillac/VMS | Thu Nov 22 1990 19:45 | 24 |
|
My bosses new car is a BMW convertible (I tried to get
him to trade up for the extra comfort and quality of a
Sinclair C5).. and his car has a feature I did not know
about until tonight
To let you know that the cars alarm is armed when the
car is parked it has a BRIGHT red light at the rear of
the car and on the drivers door (about the size of a
new 5p piece).. its quite a bright light.. clearly
visible across the car park on a dark night
Now its certainly a warning to car thieves .. but these
cars any 'feature' that makes a car stand out when
parked surly leaves it open to vandalism "Look its a
posh car.. lets do it over"
Does this BMW feature give you a car that is more theft
proof.. but more liable to vandalism ?
|
1141.36 | You AND Others can see alarm is set | CHEST::RUTTER | Rutter the Nutter | Fri Nov 23 1990 08:54 | 19 |
| I think you will find that many car alarms use some form of indicating
lamp whilst they are armed. In my car (and many others) that lamp is
inside, where it is not obviously noticed.
I have noticed that many cars in London appear to have these lamps
mounted externally, where they are more visible.
In my mind, this would have the important added feature that it
may stop someone from breaking a window to attempt to steal your
stereo, as they will notice that it is alarmed and hopefully leave alone.
Trouble is, it could have the opposite effect in two ways
The thief may recognise the alram type and know how to disarm it,
or they may spot that you have not armed the alarm at some time,
so they may take that opportunity to 'have a go'.
J.R.
|
1141.37 | ADVICE????? | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Fri Sep 13 1991 14:38 | 9 |
|
I'm going to attempt to install a MOSS MS705 this weekend.Can anyone
with past experience give me some advice???????
cheers
ANDY.A.
|
1141.38 | If it's not too late | SUBURB::SCREENER | Robert Screene, UK Finance EUC | Mon Sep 16 1991 16:06 | 81 |
| Andy,
Buy a blade fuse holder, 3 fuses, and 25 cable ties. You might want a
little pin-switch to protect your tailgate (unless it already turns on the
interior light). If you do buy it, you'll need some brown single-core
cable to run from the back of the switch to the alarm. Very thin stuff
will be fine, there's no real current drawn through it, it's just a
switched ground.
Fitting's dead simple only about 5 wires, but do thoroughly read the
small booklet first. It'll only take 15 minutes.
Disconnet the negative terminal from the battery.
Ensure the mounting bracket is really secured solidly to the bodywork
in your engine bay. This will transmit shock better from say a window
or door if it is impacted. Otherwise the shock sensor is very
insensitive. Careful of what's behind where you put any holes.
Put the alarm in a crowded area of the Engine bay, in a position where
it can't be reached or see from below the car. Route the wires
straight up away from reach, use cable ties to keep them together and
neat. Remember all they have to do is cut these and you've wasted all
this time and money.
Pass the 3 or so wires to the interior through existing rubber gromets
if possible. If you need to drill a new hole, keep it small. Don't
forget to pass the wires through the gromet before you push them in the
hole! (I did once). Paint the drilled bulkhead metal with some touch-up
paint to stop it rusting.
Throw away the free switch that is provided for you to switch out the
alarm. Go to a scrapyard or Dealers and buy a fog light switch for
your car and use that in a currently blank switch position.
Take your alarm supply from somewhere around the fusebox, the further
from the battery the better. This will mean the voltage sensing is
tripped more reliably. If you take power from the battery nothing
short of starting the car will triger it!
E.g. My central locking has a supply straight from the battery, I can
unlock the doors without trigering the alarm, but the interior light
does triger it.
Find a similar blade-type fuse holder and buy three of the correct
rated fuses. Fix this fuse holder near where you take the suply
from the fusebox. This keeps things looking neat. Don't go for
an in-line fuse holder, it's tacky.
It's best to gently pull back insulation on the selected supply wire. This
should be one which is permanently live regardless of
ignition/accessory/light switches.
You can probably do this without cutting the wire you're joining to. (you
did disconnect the battery, didn't you!) Twist both, tin and solder
together, wrap a little insulation tape round forming a 'y' shape. Then
put a nylon cable tie round the two wires' insulation/tape to take any
strain. If you're already adept at soldering such joints, sorry for
patronising you.
You can't beat a good soldered connection, avoid scotchlocks unless
you'd have to spend two hours on a particular joint without one.
Again if you need to connect an (orange?) wire to your radiator fan,
don't be tempted to use a scotchlock 'cause it's dirty and out of
reach. It's worth soldering and insulating as above.
Remember to set the sensitivity for the shock sensor (mine's at max,
but I guess that's because its on a very solid bit of inner wing panel).
I don't think you have ultrasonics, so remember your protection is
really around the interior light (someone picking the lock doesn't set
off the scock sensor). If your sun-roof/ window is left open, try to
find a way so that the light cannot be turned off or the bulb removed
before the thief opens the door. Running a line to a new, small (7
watt, 12v) bulb in the boot is a nice way around this problem if you
don't already have one.
Bon chanc�!
Robert.
|
1141.39 | Interesting stuff | BRUMMY::63536::BELL | Martin Bell, TCC, Birmingham UK | Tue Sep 17 1991 09:09 | 8 |
| Robert,
my car comes with an alarm as standard, but i found your reply a
fascinating read, thanks for the info!
Cheers,
mb
|
1141.40 | Thanks..... | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Tue Sep 17 1991 11:39 | 10 |
|
Robert,
You've been a great help,thanks very much indeed.
Thanks.
Andy.....
|
1141.41 | CALL FOR THE ALARM DOCTOR!! | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Tue Sep 17 1991 11:53 | 13 |
|
Robert,
I've just of one small problem.My car is a Nova(no that's
not the problem)It's just that connecting the RED Permenant isn't
as easy as it may sound.The fuse box on the Nova is in the interior
facia and it's not easy to get to the back of it,so unless you
can suggest anything else the only other +12v is the battery..
Any ideas??????????
CHEERS
ANDY.
|
1141.42 | some suggestions | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An amateur expert | Tue Sep 17 1991 13:05 | 3 |
| Cigarette lighter, horn, interior light.
Richard
|
1141.43 | WHY ME!!!!! | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Tue Sep 17 1991 14:58 | 15 |
|
Richard
Thanks for the advise,but i have only TWO small problems.
1)My car (Nova 1.2L)Doesn't have a cigarette lighter.
2)The horn only works when the engine is running.
Thanks all the same!!!
Anyone else?
Hopefully!
ANDY.
|
1141.44 | | SBPUS4::MARK | I missed F the FF | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:00 | 1 |
| Hazard Lights ?
|
1141.45 | BBBBBBBrilliant!! | REPAIR::ATKINS | | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:16 | 10 |
|
Thanks that's not a bad idea.But will the alternating voltage of
the warning lights upset the alarm???????
(I'm not meaning to put your suggestion down I'm just curious)
CHeers
ANDY>
|
1141.46 | Radio ? | CHEST::LEECH | IBOS - Morgue division ! | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:18 | 5 |
| I thought GM radios were permanently live, and not connected through
the ignition (or does'nt the Nova have one ? ;^)
Shaun
|
1141.47 | | SBPUS4::MARK | I missed F the FF | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:21 | 9 |
| I wouldn't have thought so. Although, if the alarm was armed, and the Hazards
were on, the neighbours would probably beat you sensless.
As long as you never intend to use both at the same time, I wouldn't have
thought you'd have a problem.
As to -1, my vauxhall appears to have some sort of relay in it so that it is
governed by the ignition normally, but it can be overridden. And if you think
that's weird, you should see the logic behind the electric windows.
|
1141.48 | Still a possibility | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An amateur expert | Tue Sep 17 1991 16:52 | 4 |
| Even if the economy model doesn't have the cigarette lighter, the
wiring for it may well be there. look behind the blanked off hole!.
Richard
|
1141.49 | Hazard switch has spare connector on NOVA | ALBURT::LEWIS | | Wed Sep 18 1991 14:16 | 7 |
| You will find on the Nova that the Hazard Warning switch has a
permanent live spade connector pin that is not used for the hazard
lights. Normally it is used to supply the radio, but if you use a
pigy-back type spade connector you can very easily connect up your
alarm.
Neil
|
1141.50 | | VOGON::ATWAL | I _am_ a hairdresser... | Thu Sep 19 1991 12:38 | 12 |
| does anyone know anywhere around Reading where I could get a _good_ car alarm
fitted?
any recomendations?
any places/makes of alarm to avoid?
thanks,
...art
|
1141.51 | If you want mobile fitting ... | RDGE44::ORCHARD_9 | You can lead me to a drink, but water maker me hoarse | Thu Sep 19 1991 13:44 | 12 |
| Recommended: STOP-A-THIEF (phone number in yellow pages)
Slightly more expensive than some other mobile
fitters, but he turned up at the time he said he
would, and did the job in the time he quoted.
He fitted a GAMMA alarm to my Golf Gti. (GAMMA
are Italian, and have a code of 1 Alpha, plus
3 numbers for the key. Giving you a pretty
unique sequence - unlike some of the cheaper
remote ones on the market.
Tony 'The Wimp' Orchard.
|
1141.52 | | SUBURB::SCREENER | Robert Screene, UK Finance EUC | Thu Sep 19 1991 14:44 | 42 |
| I rate Sextons, of Western Avenue, Woodley.
I have not had any work done by them, but judging from their attitude
and post-sales service it must be good.
They stock Crimeguard Alarms. I was looking round at the 'quality'
makes while at the In-Car'91 exhibition.
The New Crimeguard range looks impressive. These British alarms are
being marketed as having very high quality control.
Another key is that the unit is designed with all features on-board,
you don't need to purchase central locking, electric windows,
ultrasonic modules on-top.
Their top-of the range was around �220+fitting. Having a radio
transmitter key ring, central door locking link, ultrasonic sensors and
an on-board reserve battery. Interior light operation. So that when
you unlock the car, the interior light is turned on for � a minute.
A nice touch is an led which is attached to the door locks which
flashes when armed.
When I posed the question of generic decoders around, the salesman
demonstrated how the system detects an attempted unlock code. The
system goes into a second level security (the led flash speed doubles)
and the exact unlock code must then be transmitted for a full 5
seconds(i.e. you have to hold the buttom longer). This makes
frequency sweeps pointless.
Self fitting is not recommended, as it's a little complex. I explained
to the guy that I have experience of such things and he said I could
just buy the alarm and probably fit it myself. Not too complex, just
difficult!
I would estimate a 2 hour labour charge.
The only thing which I would change in my ideal product would be to
have microwave sensing, not ultrasonics. So you don't have to bypass
the unterior movement protection just because you want to leave the
sunroof open. Also I like scrambled egg!
Robert.
|
1141.53 | Alarmingly technical alarms and stuff.... | BELSMT::FLANAGAN | BLOW your probs away with a TURBO | Fri Sep 20 1991 12:00 | 22 |
| Robert I have a Sonar alarm inc ultrasonics and central locking
connection on my RS Turbo. I know that if the sunroof is left open
(even tilted), or if a window is left even fractionally open that the
ultrasonics pick up movement. How do microwaves overcome this ? I take
it you could leave all the windows and sunroof openwhen utilising
microwave sensors then ?
Also does anyone have a Sonar, and are they good jobs. Mine was 223
quid fitted. I have installed Moss 715s on two of my previous cars as
well as my Mum's and Aunty's (for a healthy profit :-) ). I found that
my Mum's gives the odd false alarm (and I didn't put ultrasonics on
her's). No false alarms from the Sonar though, but then I didn't fit it
:-)
Anyone had any experience of the new Moss jobbies which set up a sort
of force field around the outside of the vehicle and warn people (in a
human voice) that they are encroaching too close to the car, and to
move away or "I" will sound the alarm ???! I believe it also has an LCD
display inside which will record ans tell you if there were any alarm
triggers, and which sensor picked it up - useful if anything is faulty,
think they also have automatic arming, if you forget......
Gary.
|
1141.54 | They are counterproductive | OSI::ROBINSON | OSI Upper Layer Architect | Fri Sep 20 1991 12:15 | 16 |
|
re -1
> Anyone had any experience of the new Moss jobbies which set up a sort
> of force field around the outside of the vehicle and warn people (in a
> human voice) that they are encroaching too close to the car, and to
> move away or "I" will sound the alarm ???!
IMHO they are a waste of time. The last ISO SC21 meeting was held in a
'holiday camp' near Arles France. Someone had such an alarm fitted on a Merc.
All it did was encourage people to stand nearby to set the alarm off. Much to
our annoyance, it did not sound the alarm, only threaten to do so.
Anyone who fits such an alarm to their car needs their head examining.
Dave
|
1141.55 | | SUBURB::SCREENER | Robert Screene, UK Finance EUC | Fri Sep 20 1991 17:58 | 7 |
| Ahh,
You have missed the subtle, fiendish plan of these alarm designers.
With a crowd of people round your Merc, who is going to steel it?
Rob. "who's now out for a fortnight"
|
1141.56 | Jackson's info | TASTY::NISBET | Open the pod bay doors, Hal. | Wed Oct 09 1991 17:18 | 10 |
| I was talking to a bloke at Jackson, (where my car is in for a circu.
�260 36000 mile service ouch), and he boasted about how *long* it took
them to fit a car alarm, rather than how quickly. He said that with so
much facia work and electrics affected, they tended to take their time.
Hmmm - I'll see what the quote for a fitting is, and see if the labour
is charged for a loooong time too.
Dougie
|
1141.57 | So you thought you were protected ! | FUTURS::LEECH | Three wheels on my wagon... | Fri May 08 1992 16:24 | 15 |
| I have just read an article in Cars and Car Coversions about car theft,
alarms and the like. They have been researching HOW cars are stolen
with some very disturbing results. There are the infamous 'slim jims'
which come in very professional kits now and in their words (Without
permission) 'The versions wa saw were neatly made with the makers name
on the handle. With the set, you also get a little book explaining
what is necessary to disarm and factory fitted alarm on any model of
car on the UK market' !!!
They go on to explain how detailed the book is, and it makes very
disturbing reading !! With this information apparently so easily
available, its no wonder peoples cars keep disappearing.
Shaun.
|
1141.58 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | I only _work_ in outer space | Fri May 08 1992 17:26 | 17 |
| An attempt was made recently to break into my car (in Manchester).
The passenger door lock has been damaged as well as surrounding
bodywork.
I guess the would be thieves were disturbed as everything else was in
tact and nothing was stolen.
I asked my manager if he thought it wise for the company to fit a VSL
alarm as in the past alarms have been fitted to cars that have had
breakins or been stolen. He mentioned that he had read that car fleet
had advised that alarms are no longer considered a deterent and that
employees should make sure they lock their cars, shut all windows and
park under a street light ! This is considered to be enough.
Has anyone else heard about this ?
Roy
|
1141.59 | CC pays the money, Insurance take the chance. | ROMA::RUSSELL | Which one is the "Any" key? | Fri May 08 1992 21:56 | 10 |
| re .58;
well, since I left my car locked, with all windows closed, under a
street lamp in a B.R, car park, with the removable radio removed and
placed in the boot, and returned to find the car broken into, with the
radio and the wiring neatly removed, at a cost to insurance of approx
�300, I'm not sure I consider it enough...
Peter who hasn't got a VSL alarm, but has lost three radios in
three years.
|
1141.60 | | NSDC::SIMPSON | | Sun May 10 1992 19:45 | 9 |
| RE: .57
Does the article (or any other article) grade car alarms as to their
effectiveness. I am thinking of buying one and would like some pointers -
spending money on something which is easy to disable does not appeal...
Cheers
Steve
|
1141.61 | Sparkrite SR70 for 40 pounds. | RDGE44::ALEUC2 | Barry Gates, 7830-1179 | Mon May 11 1992 12:16 | 9 |
| My car was broken into last night but the thief was scared off by the
alarm which is just a remote-control current-sensing Sparkrite cheapo.
Model no. SR70 I think. What really p!$$e$ me off is the sod slashed
the vynide quarterlight on the soft top when he could have just pushed
his hand through the gap between the window and the roof. Stupid.
I think I'll leave it unlocked with the alarm set in future, but the
point is a cheap alarm does offer some protection.
Barry.
|
1141.62 | | LEECHS::hilton | Beer...now there's a temporary solution | Mon May 11 1992 12:29 | 6 |
| Top Gear last week said if you have a cabriolet, remove everything, put
the alarm on, then leave a window open. That way if they really want to
break in they won't slash the roof! I haven't decided whether they were
joking or not!
Greg
|
1141.63 | | NEWOA::SAXBY | Clever critters;Squirrels! | Mon May 11 1992 12:34 | 12 |
|
I don't think they were.
Someone who shares a house with a colleague here had his Golf's roof
slashed. There didn't seem to be any intent to break in, it was just
vandalism.
Whilst Cabriolet's are fun to own on a sunny day, they're not much fun
when you find the roof slashed on a cold, wet night. Not to mention the
horrifically high insurance (for once, it seems appropriate too!).
Mark
|
1141.64 | not the best idea I've heard | PAKORA::GAITKENHEAD | | Mon May 11 1992 22:40 | 5 |
| Do you really think it would be a good idea to leave a window open !!!
It would be a magnet for every drunk within a 100 yrd radius to come
and throw-up/urinate onto your seats. You'd also have casual
pedestrians using it as a convenient litter bin.
|
1141.65 | A good little runner! | PEKING::ATKINSA | | Tue Mar 02 1993 13:14 | 16 |
|
I've got my new Nova which has a Vauxhall alarm,this detects intrusion
by door pins,and vibration.The thing is that there is a fair delay
between the door opening and the alarm going off,there is no remote to
switch the alarm off so I have to turn the ignition key to click 3 and
then disable the alarm.The thing is a crook in the know would be able
to get in and perhaps disable the alarm without it going off.
Has anyone got any experience of the WASP alarm? This is like a giant
padlock,and i.m thinking of using this in conjunction with the Vaux alarm.
Any ideas?
Andy...Nice..Nova...
p.s. Does anyone know whether the delay on the Vaux alarm can be
adjusted?
|
1141.66 | | MAJORS::ALFORD | lying Shipwrecked and comatose... | Tue Mar 02 1993 16:21 | 12 |
| > then disable the alarm.The thing is a crook in the know would be able
> to get in and perhaps disable the alarm without it going off.
You are not supposed to be able to disarm the alarm without the ignition key at
postion 3, so, unless the thief has the ignition key or a dummy that acts the
same way, the thief will not be able to switch the alarm off.....
I don't know this for certain, because I have the remote control version and my
switch is permanently set to Auto...but that's what the book says.
It's not a bad alarm, except that I wish I could turn the "squeak" off !!
|
1141.67 | Alarms on Lease Cars(moved by mod.RS) | WOTVAX::BANKSM | Out to Lunch | Fri Mar 12 1993 14:34 | 33 |
| Has anyone had any experience of persuading Fleet to pay for an alarm
on their lease car ? Apparently the current rules say that it has to be
charged back to your cost centre, and I'm told we are very poor :-(
Sorry to bring up the topic of stolen cars again, (wait until it
happens to you !) but as a relatively new starter whose car has been
off the road longer than on it due to a recent theft -> joy-ride ->
police chase (!) -> escape -> recovery -> draughty-drive-to-garage ->
hire-car-for-two-weeks scenario, obviously ** I ** know that the garage
costs (~ �500) plus the car hire (~ �200) in ** MY ** case costs more
than putting an alarm on, and I accept that:
(cost-of-alarm) * (total-carfleet) < (total-loss-to-Digital)
surely this policy needs to be more flexible for
more-likely-to-be-stolen cars ? The one I just got back had already
been stolen from it's former driver and it's a fair chance it will go
again. (Incidentally, it went off my drive, not from some dark alley or
car park, and it's dead nice where I live (or at least, that's what the
Estate Agent told me)). (OK, I suppose someone will put in a note about
it not mattering where you live these days re car theft !).
Even taking the fuse / rotor-arm / petrol-tank out etc. still means
lotsa damage while they get in before they work out they can't start
it.
(Incidentally, the Police look at you in a really pained way when you
tell them you have a boy-racer-mobile without an alarm (like "why not
stick a sign on it saying �please steal me�"). Also it's dead
embarrasing with your mates when your turbo-nutter-b.....d XR999 is
replaced by a Fiesta 1.1L). I also fancied the idea of an inflatable
Rottweiller / tremble-operated-growling-tape for the back seat.
|
1141.68 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Mar 12 1993 14:47 | 13 |
| �charged back to your cost centre, and I'm told we are very poor :-(
Your cost centre will be poorer still if it continues to have to pay
to costs of your stolen car.
Normally your manager should recognise that it will cost more in the
long run if no alarm is fitted.
If you can't get any luck there. You should consider paying for one
yourself if you don't want the hassle.
Roy (I've been down this route myself. I'm still with an alarm-less
Fiesta turbo).
|
1141.69 | | WOTVAX::EBYGUM::WATTERSONP | another day another bill | Fri Mar 12 1993 15:00 | 9 |
|
re .67
I presume you're at Kelvin Close if you're noting from WOTVAX ? If so
I'd just recommened you speak to your manager about car alarms and
remind him of the number of cars stolen/broken into at the car parks
here at K1 and K2 - another Astra went last week.
Paul
|
1141.70 | I've never seen a farmer on a bike! (and they plead poverty too) | WELCLU::YOUNG | Policemen aren't nasty people | Fri Mar 12 1993 15:29 | 11 |
|
As stated In -.2 in a between the lines way (as I understand it) there is
no cost to car fleet in a stolen/damaged car it's all covered by
insurance dept/cross-charged to your cost centre so there is no benefit
to car fleet in you having an alarm on your car, the major advantage is
to you in inconvinience and your cost centre.
Re: your cost centre being very poor at the moment all good managers
tell people that all the time....take it with a pinch of salt 8*)
Richard (young)
|
1141.71 | | VANGA::KERRELL | but that's not my real job | Fri Mar 12 1993 16:24 | 6 |
| Why do CC managers let people order these crudy cars with no alarms in the first
place?
I thought all half-decent motors had alarms nowadays.
Dave.
|
1141.72 | Do you really want this car? | ARRODS::BARROND | Snoopy Vs the Red_Barron | Fri Mar 12 1993 17:33 | 18 |
| If an individual wants a XR9I, Fiasco Turble, Golf VR6,Cossie, or whatever
souped up gofaster set of wheels that would be the attraction of every joy
rider.
What is so wrong with idea that Digital mandating them to sponser/fund an alarm
and the cost was automatically included into the money they pay. I think we are
talking in the region of �80/year. If the car is the "what you really, really
oh so painfully I must have this vehicle" sort of desire. �80/yr is a snip.
Otherwise take the 1.6LS cooking version, save at least �80 and the extra
cost of the lease.
Dave
|
1141.73 | Not stolen for 5 days now !! | WOTVAX::BANKSM | Out to Lunch | Mon Mar 15 1993 10:45 | 10 |
| Certainly when (if) I get to order a new car, I will specify an alarm
and stump up the extra dosh if necc. Unfortunately I am in the "Second
Hand" market 'cos I'm new. I have also been led to believe that it is
"policy" at Warrington to order cars with alarms as standard...
un4tunately my take-over TNB came from BBP.
Incidentally, I did go buy a very nice red flashing LED for 96p on
Saturday and am happily drilling holes all over the dashboard trying to
find somewhere where the crooks can see it when the car is parked, but
doesn't give me an epileptic fit whilst I'm driving.
|
1141.74 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Mar 15 1993 11:27 | 15 |
| re .72
The insurance for performance cars is higher and this extra cost is
passed on to us in the driver cost. We are already paying extra for the
privilege of driving a car of our choice.
Part of the attraction of having a company car is that whilst it is our
responsibility to ensure it is securely locked and nothing left on
display, it should not be up to us to pay extra to further protect
a car that is not our property.
Sure if you don't want the hassle and if you carry personal belongings
around worth more than �100 then its worth paying extra yourself.
Roy
|
1141.75 | I'm confused? | HEWIE::RUSSELL | So, who did vote for the Tories? | Mon Mar 15 1993 11:40 | 9 |
| My last two cars both "lost" a couple of radios, so this must have cost
�600 or so for each of them. When I suggested to my boss that she pay for
an alarm to reduce this on my new car, she said no, as her cost centre
doesn't pay for this kind of theft, but she would have to pay for the alarm.
Is she wrong? Does the cost of this come back to Insurance, or individual
cost centres?
Peter.
|
1141.76 | | PEKING::SMITHRW | The Great Pyramid of Bloke | Mon Mar 15 1993 12:17 | 7 |
| re: back a couple
The red flashing LED won't give you a fit whilst driving if you rig it
with a concealed OFF switch....8*)
Richard
|
1141.77 | | ARRODS::BARROND | Snoopy Vs the Red_Barron | Mon Mar 15 1993 12:25 | 27 |
| Roy,
Re:.74
>>Part of the attraction of having a company car is that whilst it is our
>>responsibility to ensure it is securely locked and nothing left on
>>display, it should not be up to us to pay extra to further protect
>>a car that is not our property.
Your argument is fine by me. If you wish to take the risk and the car gets
stolen, Digital supplies you with a alternate vehicle.
Will you mind having a standard group C car. Serria 1.6lx or whatever and
having to continue paying out a lot of money for your (stolen) choice? If
the car is recovered and repaired it might not "feel" right again. If it is
deemed "lost" how long before you get a new car?
Also managers that take the (limited) view that "I'll have to pay for the alarm
but I don't have to if you have 10 write offs or have the car stolen 15 times"
are looking at the problem too personally. Digital have to pay for the alarm
cost AND insurance repair costs (except in total loss arrangements, can't
remember what the Digital excess is but it is very high �3k? It is REAL $$
that leave the company coffers.
I think a bit more give and take from both parties is called for on this
point.
Regards
|
1141.78 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Mon Mar 15 1993 12:58 | 19 |
| I guess the point that the Red Barron is trying to make is that if we
have super-duper cars that are popular with tea-leafs, then as well as
the additional insurance cost, we should also have to pay the extra for
an alarm if one isn't fitted.
I still disagree on principle. It _is_ the cost centre that has to pay
for accident repairs and any other costs associated with thefts.
It is up to your manager if he decides that fitting an alarm would save
his cost centre money or not.
Your point about a low spec hire car replacement is well taken. As I
said in my previous reply, if you don't want this hassle pay the extra
for an alarm yourself.
Lets face it though, most popular performance cars on the scheme these
days come with an alarm as standard anyway.
Roy
|
1141.79 | So much for the LED | WOTVAX::BANKSM | Out to Lunch | Wed Mar 17 1993 09:26 | 10 |
| Well it lasted nearly a week; at least this time, it got broken into in
K1 car park at Warrington, so I don't feel too guilty. Fortunately
someone had showed me how to immobilise it (won't say how here as it's
the only advantage I have over the crooks !) but it looks like it'll be
off the road for at least another week for new glass, locks etc.
Can I just point out to anyone who saw me sat in the Police Car outside
K1 reception last night that I was filling in the report, not being
taken away. (It's not true what they say about me, and even if it was,
they can't prove anything...)
|
1141.80 | | WARHED::GILLILAND | | Thu Mar 18 1993 18:49 | 3 |
| What exactly is this car that is so desirable to unsavoury types?
Phil Gill.
|
1141.81 | Gone but not Forgotten | WOTVAX::BANKSM | Out to Lunch | Fri Mar 19 1993 16:42 | 5 |
| � What exactly is this car that is so desirable to unsavoury types? �
A black Ford Fiesta RS Turbo. At time of writing, it's back at BCM
having new glass and locks; in fact I "haven't" had it longer than I
"have" had it. (the car I mean (oo-er, sounds a bit rude)).
|
1141.82 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri Mar 19 1993 17:00 | 4 |
| Thats a coincidence. I also have a (non-alarmed) black Fiesta RS turbo
and the only time I've had it broken into was when I was in Warrington.
Roy
|
1141.83 | | SUBURB::ALLYS | | Fri Mar 19 1993 17:37 | 10 |
| Roy,
If it makes you feel any better before I gave my RS up, mine was stolen from
Reading. I wonder if the alarm does make that much difference, my current car
( a takeover car) was stolen and recovered ( before I had it); that has an
alarm.
Shaz
|
1141.84 | Here, have mine. | CURRNT::CARSON | | Sun Mar 21 1993 15:36 | 1 |
| I live in Warrington and have Spare RS Fiesta if you'd like it :-)
|
1141.85 | Scorpion Contact ? | CURRNT::PARTRIDGE | | Tue Mar 23 1993 11:04 | 10 |
| Does anyone know where I can get a new remote unit
for a Scorpion alarm system ?
Mine has become very temperamental.
It can be rather inconvenient to set the alarm on your
car and then find you can't disable it !?!
Thanks,
Jeremy.
|
1141.86 | | ESBS01::RUTTER | Rut The Mutt | Tue Mar 23 1993 11:51 | 5 |
| � Mine has become very temperamental.
Have you checked/replaced the battery in it ?
J.R.
|
1141.87 | The Whole Story | CURRNT::PARTRIDGE | | Tue Mar 23 1993 12:01 | 10 |
| Yes I did try a new battery, but it seems the microswitch
inside the unit is not working.
So Mark (Sparky) Watkins managed to bypass the switch by
shorting out contacts on the circuit board with a Yale key.
Ingenius or what!
But I agree it would be a good idea to keep a spare battery
(or unit) handy.
|
1141.88 | | KERNEL::MCGOWAN | | Tue Mar 23 1993 13:45 | 8 |
| I've been thinking that a dashboard LED indication of an armed alarm
is probably a bad thing as it warns a potential thief that they have to
disarm something before they break in (most alarms are fairly easy to
disarm if you know what to do). If you want the alarm to go off, don't
tell anyone it's there in the first place.
Comments ?
Pete
|
1141.89 | | PEKING::TAFF::Wob | Robert Screene, UK Finance EUC | Wed Mar 24 1993 18:53 | 14 |
| I'd rather have the deterrent effect of the light.
I've had my car broken into and THEN the alarm went off. Scared off the
thief. Still left my door in a mess.
My vote goes to a big "IMMOBOLISER/generic Alarm" sticker, nice flashing
LED. Link it to the parking light circuit, then it won't operate when the
engine is running.
Rob.
|
1141.90 | Crime prevention ? - baah | SHIPS::SHADBOLT_S | | Fri May 07 1993 13:11 | 6 |
| Of course, the trouble with car alarms (house alarms too) is that they
don't prevent theft. It just means that someone elses car gets stolen
instead ! That's the trouble with the government "Crime Prevention"
schemes - window bolts aren't going to prevent crime.
Steve.
|
1141.91 | | KERNEL::SHELLEYR | | Fri May 07 1993 13:41 | 14 |
| �It just means that someone elses car gets stolen
So if my car gets nicked from outside my house nad doesn't have an
alarm then its my neighbours faults because he has an alarm fitted to
his car !
The whole idea of making your own car more secure is so
that the thief moves on. The Crime Prevention schemes
are making people more aware. This is a good thing.
What you appear to be saying is forget about alarms and security,
you'll never stop theft so why bother even locking your car.
Royston
|
1141.92 | Misuse of terms | SHIPS::SHADBOLT_S | | Fri May 07 1993 17:58 | 17 |
| >>So if my car gets nicked from outside my house nad doesn't have an
>>alarm then its my neighbours faults because he has an alarm fitted to
>>his car !
That's exactly right. There is no escaping the fact that the more cars
that becom alarmed, the more at risk are those cars that don't have
alarms. Unfortunately it ends up with the people who can't afford such
luxury suffering the most.
I'm not saying don't bother to lock your car - obviously everyone wants
to take as much care of their property as they can. My point is that we
get misled by the term "crime prevention". Car alarms deter thieves
from stealing a particular car - they don't reform their character.
Steve (who has an alarmed car after two others were stolen from near
his house).
|
1141.93 | Heap City Special | PEKING::SMITHRW | The Great Pyramid of Bloke | Mon May 10 1993 09:42 | 7 |
|
If my car thought it was going to be stolen, it wouldn't be alarmed.
It would be flattered.
Richard
|
1141.94 | Comments? | CLADA::JFOY | | Wed May 12 1993 12:27 | 5 |
| A friend of mine was passing some guys working on the phone lines. The alarm
of her car and the 2 cars in front immediately switched on (as they were
driving!). It wasn't Apr 1st. Can anyone shed some light on this?
jf
|
1141.95 | Jamming all bands! | TIMMII::RDAVIES | An expert Amateur | Thu May 13 1993 11:47 | 4 |
| Has it Radio remote control?. I've often notice radio break-over onto
the FM radio when I'm near BT vans.
Richard
|
1141.96 | | SUBURB::FRENCHS | Semper in excernere | Thu May 13 1993 12:34 | 25 |
| re:
� Has it Radio remote control?. I've often notice radio break-over onto
� the FM radio when I'm near BT vans.
Have you. I would report it to the DTI as this could be a breach of licensing
conditions, interference to broadcast.
It doesn't surprise me though BT use 85.137 - 85.200 Mhz, very close to the
88 - 108 Mhz broadcast band. It could just be that the front end of your
receiver is either too sensitive or not selective enough. Although I would
expect more interference in the first harmonic ie. 170.270 - 170.400 Mhz.
Radio car alarms are around 418 Mhz. This is between the 4th and 5th harmonic,
there shouldn't be any RF transmitted at this frequency.
The complete Telecom frequency list is:
71.512 - 72.787 WATER BOARDS/TELECOM/LOCAL AUTHORITIES
76.962 - 77.500 CUSTOMS/TELECOM
85.012 - 86.287 WATER BOARDS/TELECOM/LOCAL AUTHORITIES/COMMUNITY REPEATERS
85.137 - 85.200 BRITISH TELECOM
450.000 - 451.000 TELECOM FIXED LINKS
464.000 - 465.000 TELECOM FIXED LINKS
|
1141.97 | | PAPERS::CORNE | John Corne - Product & Technology group | Thu May 13 1993 13:35 | 3 |
| Shouldn't a remote control BT van be in the "seen in passing" note :-)
Jc
|
1141.98 | How safe are these alarms if this kinda thing happens? | CLADA::JFOY | | Fri May 14 1993 15:38 | 5 |
| It is a pihrana remote alarm. Doesn't say much for 'security' when this
kind of thing happens. Surely they use something more sophisticated
than a simple FM signal...?
jf
|
1141.99 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Thu Mar 17 1994 11:51 | 17 |
| Heres a tip for folks with VSL alarms fitted to lease cars from Oct
'93.
These are the type with the red (on/off) and grey (panic) buttons on
the remote key fob.
You may have noticed that if you press the test (panic) button just
after priming alarm that only the indicators flash and the alarm does
not actually sound. This is in fact a 'feature'. When you do this it
disables the interior sensers allowing you to leave a window open or
sunroof open but leaves all door switches active.
Of course you may know this already but I didn't find out until a VSL
engineer mentioned it to me when I had an additional door switch
fitted to the hatchback.
Royston
|
1141.100 | RTFM | VANGA::KERRELL | The first word in DECUS is Digital | Thu Mar 17 1994 12:35 | 5 |
| re.99:
It's in the documentation you get with the alarm.
Dave.
|
1141.101 | | COMICS::PARRY | Trevor Parry | Thu Mar 17 1994 12:42 | 6 |
| RE: .100
I didn't get any documentation on my VSL alarm when I took the car
over. I'm still finding new features with it.
tp
|
1141.102 | Documentation? What documentation? | CMOTEC::POWELL | Nostalgia isn't what it used to be, is it? | Thu Mar 17 1994 13:18 | 5 |
|
I don't remember any documentation coming with any of my VSL Alarms, not
even with the VSL (Diesel) Engine Immobiliser on my Xantia.
Malcolm.
|
1141.103 | Documentation? Whassat then? | WELSWS::HEDLEY | Lager Lout | Thu Mar 17 1994 13:18 | 5 |
| I didn't get any documentation for the VSL when I got my car, just a couple
of warning stickers. Took me ages to figure out what that mysterious keyhole
in an obscure part of the dash did!
Chris.
|
1141.104 | Pardon me for breathing | COMICS::SHELLEY | Bugs B Gone | Thu Mar 17 1994 13:21 | 9 |
| re .100
Dave, your one liner suggested to me that because it was 'in the ****ing
manual' it was not worth mentioning.
This notesfile is for sharing information whether its documented or
not.
Royston
|
1141.105 | | VANGA::KERRELL | The first word in DECUS is Digital | Thu Mar 17 1994 13:36 | 8 |
| re.104:
How was I to know that the VSL manual was a secret that nobody could have
guessed existed unless presented with one?
Now you know it exists, you can go ask Fleet where your copy is!
Dave.
|
1141.128 | HELP!!! | IRNBRU::61549::Spike | Do you munch stump? | Mon Jan 06 1997 12:14 | 11 |
1141.129 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Wed Feb 26 1997 09:18 | 11 |
| I've had VSL alarms on 3 of my lease cars and never had a false alarm.
Last night my car alarm went off around midnight for absolutely no
apparent reason. It wasn't raining, th ewind had died down, all the
windows were shut, there was no sign of break-in (the cars was parked
on a gravel drive and we have a very alert dog).
Has anyone had probs with false alarms with their VSL alarms at all ?
I'll see if it happens again before I get it checked over.
Royston
|
1141.130 | | MARVIN::MILLS | | Wed Feb 26 1997 09:38 | 14 |
| > Has anyone had probs with false alarms with their VSL alarms at all ?
> I'll see if it happens again before I get it checked over.
There was a fault on the early Frontera Estate cars concerning car
alarms. Water used to seep through the rear light fittings when
it rained and used to run along the wires to a circuit junction box.
This would spark and force the car alarm to trigger.
The fix on the later models was not to prevent water from seeping
through the light fittings, but to tie a loop in the wire
before the junction box so that the water would drip
off the wire!
Grant.
|
1141.131 | Watch the traffic when your hazards come on at 80MPH! | COMICS::CORNEJ | What's an Architect? | Wed Feb 26 1997 09:58 | 11 |
| My Peugeot 405 alarm was destroyed by water (I drove through a deep
flood and being diesel I didn't worry :-)
A few weeks later I had lots of problems with the alarm doing things
that Hadleys said it couldn't - at one stage they even replaced the
computer inside the alarm. Turned out to be water in the door swtches
making an intermittent contact that looked as if the doors were opening
hundreds of times a second!
Jc
|
1141.132 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Wed Feb 26 1997 10:11 | 6 |
| Ahhhhh! You may well have hit the nail on the head.
That evening I (accidentally of course :) ) went storming through
a flooded road. I guess it could well have been the water.
Royston
|
1141.133 | | OSEC::GRAHAM | Graham Smith, Solution Support Group | Wed Feb 26 1997 12:45 | 7 |
| If the alarm goes off again tonight, whatever you do, don't switch the
alarm off.
Am I correct in remembering a note in here about a car that was stolen
on the third night ?
Graham
|
1141.134 | | COMICS::SHELLEY | Don't get mad, get even. | Wed Feb 26 1997 13:26 | 7 |
| Thanks for the advice. The alarm never went off this morning in the
car park so I think its ok now.
I'll keep the MP5 with M203 grenade launcher on standby tonight in case
theres any action.
Royston
|
1141.135 | Interference | CHEFS::BULLOWSN | Rewrite the future | Wed Feb 26 1997 14:00 | 3 |
| Was it the night they were testing Channel 5.
Cheers Nick
|