T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
74.1 | Buy digital... | STAR::FARNHAM | Stu Farnham, VMS | Wed Sep 17 1986 13:56 | 8 |
|
I've got setback thermostats from Sears that I bought a few years
ago. My only complaint is that they are mechanically controlled,
and as such only operate on one set of setback times (up to 3 high/low
pairs per set). Many of the digital models allow multiple sets of
setback times, so that you can specify different behavior for weekends
than weekdays.
|
74.2 | My Oil Co. Recommended Honywell | KELVIN::RPALMER | Handyman in Training | Wed Sep 17 1986 15:24 | 5 |
| My oil burner service man recommended Honywell set back
thermostats. He said they were well built and and replacement parts
were easy to find. Does anyone know of a place to get a good deal
on Honywell thermostats?
=Ralph=
|
74.3 | Noise, then Money | ZEPPO::EKBERG | John Ekberg, Stow MA | Wed Sep 17 1986 15:55 | 40 |
| I got the same suggestion from my oil co. Honeywell was the best,
and can be had from them (at, they admit, mucho $$) or go to Sears.
Over last winter, I picked up two setbacks for 2 different zones:
1- Since I had a circular thermostat and was not in the mood to
spend a lot, I got a First Alert add-on at Spags for around $29.
It attaches via a collar to the existing thermostat, has 4 time
settings per weekday and 4 for weekends. Works on AA batteries
and about the only concern is that the step motor that turns the
setting wheel is noisy. It has the normal override with a button
on the outside of the unit. Press once to go up, release, press
to go down. If you're trying to change the setting by only a few
degrees, it gets tricky. In short, you get a lot for a little
as long as the noise is isolated from people.
2- Must have gotten a pay raise or something, because towards the
end of the winter found a sale at Sears on the Weekender. This
beauty runs off the circuit (battery to store settings though),
has same amount of settings, differentiates with weekends/weekdays.
Override is via two arrow keys, so easy to override program. Easy
to program too, by the way. Price was about $58 versus a normal
$90+. Put this in the master bedroom and no noise to interrupt
(separate zone).
I've been happy with both given the price and location differences;
of course, we're not talking years of experience here either. Sears
will have sales on this stuff from time to time. There are 2 types
of weekenders at Sears, varying mostly in the display itself.
Both units (Sears/First ALert) have LCD displays, with the Sears
being larger and holding more information.
I was told to stay away from Robershaws, the kind that you can get
at K-Mart, etc. by the oil co. There was one when we bought this
house, and it worked, so can't help there. Someone else might be
able to help on this.
Hope this helps.
John
|
74.4 | Maybe SPAGS | BOVES::FORTMILLER | Ed Fortmiller | Wed Sep 17 1986 17:37 | 2 |
| At one time, SPAGS handled Honeywell. I haven't checked lately
so I don't know if they still carry them.
|
74.5 | Don't buy Sears | DSSDEV::REINIG | August G. Reinig | Wed Sep 17 1986 19:14 | 14 |
| I bought a Sears set back thermostat (on sale of course). It worked
fine. Then my wife and I left for Thanksgiving. We came back to
a cold house. The thermocouple on the furnace blew. Had it replaced
immediately (it was COLD). The furnace came on, heated the house,
and kept on heating. I couldn't shut the thing off, so I had to
turn off the furnace directly. Luckily, I kept the old thermostat
so I replaced it and things were back to the state they were before
I installed the Sears one.
When I returned the thermostat, I got my money back. No one at
Sears was willing to tell me if I had a defective thermostat, or
what. I did follow the installation instructions carefully.
August G. Reinig
|
74.6 | CALL ME CHEAP BUT ... | DSTAR::SMICK | Van Smick | Thu Sep 18 1986 08:28 | 17 |
|
In spite of what was said in a previous reply, I have a Robertshaw
and can honestly say that I would do it again. I bought the "Deluxe"
model at Channel last year and it worked great.
The furnace service man looked at it and said he had the same model
in his house -- which either says Robertshaw is ok or that the furnace
guy is no brighter than us poor slobs!
Anyway, mine allows me to set different settings each day (I only
have two --weekdays and weekends) with a maximum of one setback
per day.
Bottom line: It sure makes it easier to get out of bed on a cold
morning!
|
74.7 | Watch out for Gas Powerpile Systems | GAYNES::FORTMILLER | Ed Fortmiller | Thu Sep 18 1986 10:32 | 9 |
| Some gas furnaces have what is called a powerpile system. If your
furnace has one of these you will need a thermostat that works with
such a system. Some years ago I purchased a Honeywell set back
unit from Spags only to find out when I got home that the instructions
said not to use it on powerpile systems. I had to return it and
purchase one through a heating supply dealer. On a powerpile system
the thermocouple generates the current that goes through the thermostat
rather than a transformer. I have no idea why that should require
a special thermostat but the book says it does.
|
74.8 | Sears Weekender | WISDOM::NIGZUS | | Thu Sep 18 1986 11:14 | 7 |
| My experience has been with an older Honeywell and with new, digital
Sear's Weekenders. The Honeywell tended to make a low level droning
noise all of the time. The Weekenders (reg price $99, sale price
$49) are silent. They are completely digital and run off of the
low line voltage from the furnace. They have battery backup. I
have no complaints at all about them and would buy another for my
third zone when they are on sale again.
|
74.9 | RobertShaw is OK | FSTVAX::HARDEN | | Thu Sep 18 1986 12:45 | 17 |
| .3
I put a RobertShaw in my house 4 years ago and have been quite pleased
with it. Yes it goes tick tick tick but we only notice it when I
first activate it in the Fall. They said the AA battery should last
about three to four months but last heat season I never had to replace
it.
To avoid maximum frustration when buying a thermostat try to find
out whether your current thermostat is a 24 volt or milliamp unit.
I had to make the trip to the store twice because of nievity. My
system turned out to be milliamp.
By the way I can't give an exact dollar amount on the savings generated
by a setback 'stat but I get to eat steak more often now.
-boB
|
74.10 | | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Thu Sep 18 1986 13:48 | 2 |
| I used the Robertshaw deluxe unit and had some problems with it.
It eventually died. I'm back to my trusty (manual) Honeywell.
|
74.11 | Mine never DID work! | WOOF::VISCAROLA | Peter Viscarola | Thu Sep 18 1986 13:52 | 9 |
|
For what it's worth, we recently bought a Sears Weekender for our
new house (gas heat, central air). I installed it carefully, but
couldn't get it to work... As soon as my air conditioning triggered,
it stopped dead. (i.e. it ran for about a second). Never could
figure out what happened... Does anybody have any ideas??
(No, the heat didn't work either! Put my old non set-back Honeywell
back, and no problems...)
|
74.12 | I <heart> my Honeywell | NOVA::PAL | Paul Lemaire | Thu Sep 18 1986 14:08 | 21 |
| I bought my Honeywell unit from Ralph Pill electrical supply in Nashua.
I paid $78 last fall. It is a mechanical unit and comes with enough
trip pins for 3 setbacks. Being mechanical, it does not have a
week-day/week-end feature but this is not a problem for me (wife
and kids home in the daytime). It draws electricity from the control
unit on the burner (no batteries). It is a good-looking device
with an easy-to-read analog clock. The override mechanism is an
easy-to-operate button.
It has 2 separate temperate-setting levers for the warm/cool settings.
As such, it's possible to create a setback of 15 or 20 degrees.
My uncle, who is retired from the home heating business, told me
that anything more than a 10 degree setback is a waste of discomfort.
He says that you will burn as much fuel trying to recover from a
big setback as you would save during the setback (remember, you have
to heat the sheetrock, furniture, etc., not just the air).
Biggest problem with any setback thermostat: coming home late
to a frozen babysitter. If you have children and employ babysitters
you should be conscientious about either defeating the setback
before you go out or leaving instructions for the babysitter.
|
74.13 | | GAYNES::FORTMILLER | Ed Fortmiller | Thu Sep 18 1986 14:52 | 5 |
| The Honeywell set back unit I have contains an ~11 hour timer that
when it reaches 0 the furnace can go on. I like this type for a
variable schedule. Just before leaving I just guess how many hours
and turn the little knob. It does have kind of an annoying tick
while it is counting down.
|
74.14 | Weather Wizard | POP::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Thu Sep 18 1986 18:21 | 29 |
| I bought a Weather Wizard (the same people who make the Magic-Stat);
the kind you see advertised in the JS&A catalog. I bought mine
from Channel's for $89. It's completely digital with battery backup
and runs on a 24 volt system. It's equipped to handle heat & A/C.
The thermostat can be programmed for 8 different settings per day
and can be programmed for 7 days a week. A bit of overkill since
most weekdays are the same. The thermostat has alot of smarts.
For example, if you want it to be 68 degrees by 7am, it senses the
current temperature and "knows" how far in advance to ask for heat,
rather than just turning on at 7am. It also has a "hold" a particular
temperature, thus overriding the program (for the babysitter).
It also has a "hold until" setting so that if you go away for a
week, you can hold 54 degrees until next week on Tuesday when I
get back at 5pm (and I want the temperature to be 68). The thermostat
has a built-in delay cycle to prevent constant switching on and
off, especially for A/C units.
The only draw back is that the temperature increments are every
2 degrees so you might have a 4 degree temperature swing before
it detects that it should go on or off.
The thermostat has worked great and has reduced my oil consumption.
The best part is coming home to a warm house and waking up when
it's warm.
P.S. - you might need an engineering degree to operate this thing.
-al
|
74.15 | Sears Weekender testimonial | NOBUGS::CARIGNAN | Don Carignan | Fri Sep 19 1986 08:58 | 16 |
| Re .11
> For what it's worth, we recently bought a Sears Weekender for our
> new house (gas heat, central air). I installed it carefully, but
> couldn't get it to work... As soon as my air conditioning triggered,
> it stopped dead. (i.e. it ran for about a second). Never could
> figure out what happened... Does anybody have any ideas??
We have the same configuration (Weekender + gas heat/central air) and
haven't had a single problem for the 3.5 years that we've had it. My
sister just installed one in her house (same configuration) and is also
very happy with it. I'd recommend the Weekender (and its on sale now
too!). (BTW, its microprocessor-controlled -- if you mis-wire
it you'll fry it -- no second chance.)
- Don
|
74.16 | Aaaaaaaaaaugh! Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaugh! | JOET::JOET | | Fri Sep 19 1986 11:37 | 21 |
| re: .14
I think that I have the same one that you're talking about. Got it
from Heathkit. It boasts "one-button programming". What they really
mean is that you program it in real-time, so it takes a week to set up.
The ads also don't mention that if you accidentally move the slide
switch from "manual" to "cool" instead of "auto" (something you have to
do to override the program) that you have to reprogram it all over
again.
I paid about $100.00 for it and replaced dozens of batteries
in it even though I put it on a brand-new furnace EXACTLY according
to directions. Switched back to the 'ole Honeywell standard after
two miserable years.
If anyone wants to pick it up at WMO, I'll bring it in with all the
books and such if I haven't used it for target practice. It's free,
but I take no responsibility for the pain and suffering it will
undoubtedly cause you.
-joet
|
74.17 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston 225-4090 (Hudson, MA) | Fri Sep 19 1986 22:02 | 10 |
| Consumer Reports recently reviewed electronic thermostats and found
NONE acceptable. Even the good ones were plagued with bugs and sample
defects. Statistically, you may get a good one, but....
Honeywell makes quite a selection and can be bought (at a wide range
of prices) at electrical & plumbing supply places as well as SPAGS,
and some deparment stores. Watch out for older models - some have
problems with premature battery burnout. One drawback, honeywell used
to require that the battery replacement be done by desoldering the old
one and soldering in the new one.
|
74.18 | Recent Honeywell acquisition | STAR::FARNHAM | Stu Farnham, VMS | Mon Sep 22 1986 09:13 | 28 |
|
I just bought a Honeywell (model #CT300, I think) to replace an
older Sears unit which had died on us.
The box advertised it as a 2 setback, digital model, but, after
deciphering the instructions (no easy task, as they consisted of
incomprehensible examples with no explanation of the principles
of operation) discovered the following:
1. It is a single-program unit. Secondary programs are achieved
by overwriting the main program.
2. It is set in real time. You have to be at home and awake at the
time you want the energy-saving portion of the cycle to begin. You
then program in an offest (in whole hours) from the current time
to the time at which you want normal (i.e., full-temperature) operation
to resume. The problem with that is that it only allows for offsets
of 15 hours. Our cycle (the unit is for our master bedroom, where
we want full heat from about 5:30 to about 7:30 AM) is 2 hours of
full heat, 22 of energy savings. The longest energy saving period
you can get is 15 hours.
On the positive side, it's real easy to override (for, say, weekend
operation). There's a single button which inverts the current phase
without effecting programmed operation.
All in all, though, not an acceptable unit.
|
74.19 | Honywell 'Chronotherm' | LATOUR::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Mon Sep 22 1986 09:26 | 6 |
|
Honywell 'Chronotherm' setback, in use five years with no problems
and much satisfaction. Quite, accurate quartz analog clock, three
sets of tabs for normal/setback, adjustable to half-hour increments,
runs off thermostat voltage with ni-cad battery backup, puch button
override.
|
74.20 | No Real-Time Programming | POP::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Mon Sep 22 1986 10:52 | 11 |
| RE: .16
The Weather Wizard is NOT programmed in real-time. You can set
any program/setback for any day/time at any day/time.
The Magic-Stat is programmed in real-time.
I would recommend that you stay away from any setback thermostat
that is programmed in real-time. They are a real pain in the ***.
-al
|
74.21 | weather wiz | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston 225-4090 (Hudson, MA) | Mon Sep 22 1986 14:49 | 1 |
| ok - where can i get a weather wizard?
|
74.22 | More info; need more feedback on RobertShaw | ALEX::ALEX | Alex Conn | Tue Sep 23 1986 11:59 | 52 |
| Re: .12 See note 23. I was amazed at Honeywell's failure to stand
behind their product that even they admitted was defective at
manufacture.
Re: .*
I am also in the market for setback thermostats. I have looked closely
at the two top Sears units. They are guaranteed for only a year. The
"Sears Best" one has four programs for the weekdays and four for the
weekend. It is very easy to set. Note that four "programs" is really
not much different than two pairs of on/off trippers in the Honeywell
Chronotherm. So in order to have a hot period in the morning followed
by a cooler daytime (e.g. when you're working) followed by a hot period
in the evening and then a cool period at night, you *need* all four
programs. So don't be fooled by the idea that four programs would seem
like more than enough. I rejected the cheaper Sears one (has red marks
around an analog-like display) simply because it has fewer than four
settings on the weekends.
I looked at the RobertShaw currently on sale at Channel for $60. They
have had no returns on it and people are quite happy. It has a *3*
year guarantee that looks to be pretty solid. I believe that it has a
separate program for each day (useful to us, since my wife works part
time). Model T60-1044
(Channel has the Honeywell CT200A on sale for $70. That's the one I had
trouble with.)
I believe the Weather Wizard is the one that the Channel person said
didn't sell well so they are discontinuing. It is, I believe $90 and
there is one left at the Chelmsford store.
Channel has a new thermostat in called the Energeious by Jameson home
products. Model E200 looks to be similar to the top-of-the line Sears
in functionality (4 weekday programs, 4 weekend programs). They have
not had any experience with that company, however. Looks easy to
program. I believe it had a 3 year warranty, but you should check.
$60 not on sale now.
Last week Caldor had the Stanley setbacks on sale. The top fo the
line model was $65 on sale and did not look as good as either the
RobertShaw or the Sears, so I passed it up. 3 year warranty.
I believe that most of the new thermostats are "lap programmable";
that is, you can remove them from the wall and program them accoring
to the time of day (as with the Weather Wizard). Only the Stanley $50
model had the problems with not having a clock.
I'm leaning toward the RobertShaw. I have only heard one negative
comment here. Anyone own the T60-1044?
Alex
|
74.23 | ex | COBRA::DUTHIE | | Tue Sep 23 1986 12:21 | 10 |
| In my last house (which I was renting just through the winter
prior to beginning construction on my new house) there was a table
sitting below the thermostat, so I took a cheap lamp timer and plugged
a 7-watt night lite into it, and set it just below the thermostat.
By playing around with the distance from the thermostat, we could
lower the house temp about 5 degrees when the nite lite was on,
and also had a nite lite all night. If you want to override it,
just turn the nite lite off.
jim d.
|
74.24 | set back tricks | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston 225-4090 (Hudson, MA) | Wed Sep 24 1986 14:46 | 14 |
| And, for about 40 dollars - many companies will sell you a device
which magically duplicates the action of the lamp.
I added an interesting wrinkle to my set-back thermostat (honeywell,
w/pegs) that I thought I might mention: the Honeywell has only
1 set-back temperature. However, during the day, I dont care how cold
it gets - so......Since I invested (from DAK) in a BSR home control
system last fall, I tied one timer into my system to turn the system
OFF during the day. So, I get warm in morning and evening, OFF during
the day, and cooler (set-back temp) during the night. Cut my heating
bills by about 5-10% as apparently the system was running during the
day when the house cooled down to the setback temp.
/j
|
74.25 | battery ? | JON::CALABRIA | John Calabria | Thu Sep 25 1986 14:28 | 6 |
|
I have a Honeywell (w/pegs).
The battery seems to have died, as the clock will not run.
(I did follow the charging instructions in the manual)
Does anyone know the voltage of this battery ?
|
74.26 | Robertshaw feedback | Q::ROSENBAUM | Rich Rosenbaum | Thu Sep 25 1986 15:20 | 13 |
| I installed the Robertshaw fancy model sometime ago. At the same
time I was having problems with the control relay on my burner.
By the time I got everything working, both the original relay AND
the Robertshaw thermostat were fried.
So....I don't really know what caused what. If I ever find the
original sales slip, I might try returning it to Robertshaw under
warrantee, and trying again...
I have no problems with its programmability - it was the most flexible
unit I found.
__Rich
|
74.27 | YES VOTE FOR T60-1044 | DSTAR::SMICK | Van Smick | Fri Sep 26 1986 09:43 | 21 |
| RE: .22
Alex,
I have the model T60-1044 and am very happy with it (See .6). It
does have a separate program for each day with a maximum of two
setbacks per day (up 6am, down 9am, up 5pm down 11pm).
I did have an opportunity to call their service department this
spring. The unit was "eating" batteries. Much to my embarrassment
they correctly diagnosed the problem as operator error -- I turned
off the furnace, which supplies the power for the unit!
But the point is, I called, was passed to a technical expert, who
took the time to listen to my problem, told me what was wrong, and
did not make me feel like a jerk.
RobertShaw gets my vote.
|
74.28 | Robertshaw looks good to me | ALEX::ALEX | Alex Conn | Fri Sep 26 1986 18:30 | 35 |
| I bought the T60-1044 yesterday and played around with it, and decided
to keep it. It looks to be much higher quality than the Sears units
or the Stanley (and the other unit I saw at Channel similar to the
Sears only has a one year warranty).
In particular, the buttons have a positive click rather than sometimes
working (as on the Sears) and partially deforming the case when pushed
(Sears). Additionally, if you are used to the Honeywell Chronotherm,
the Robertshaw programs with a similar concept, except that there are
two setbacks in addition to the normal setting, rather than just one. So
you can set a temperature during the day to cool down to which is warmer
than the temperature you might use during the night. Also, you can
program both different time periods and different setback temperatures
for each day, so if one spouse is home part of the time, you can
compensate. The connector for the unit (connects the programming part
to the wall part so that you can program the thing while sitting down)
looks like it is less likely to fail than other units. Compared to the
Sears, the only thing I could see that it lacks is some LED to tell that
the furnace is ON. I would have to admit, however, that for
non-computer types, the Robertshaw would not be as easy to program as
the Sears Best one. Also, to be fair, the Sears does offer four
different temperatures during the day, although to me that is not nearly
as important as having independent programs per day but with three
temperatures.
Re: .25 replacing the batteries may not fix the problem if you have the
CT200, it could be the clock. Try something like 3-4 Volts to the clock
to see if the clock starts up (when coaxed). If so, the Honeywell
battery replacement ought to do it. (I can't remember the precise
voltage of the Honeywell batteries; that's my best recollection.) If
the clock does work with 3-4 volts but does not work when the new Honeywell
battery is charged, you might try adding a AAA rechargeable cell (Radio
Shack, etc) in series as I did.
Alex
|
74.29 | setback for electric heat? | SQM::THOMPSEN | | Tue Sep 30 1986 14:13 | 10 |
| Are there setback thermostats available for electric baseboard
heaters? The typical setbacks I've seen are obviously not made for
all the current passing through an electric heater thermostat. Even
though one setback thermostat would only control 1 baseboard heater,
it would be useful for the spring and fall when temp fluctuations
are too great to get the woodstove cranking. Anyone ever seen
one for electric heat? If so, how much do they cost?
Thanks
- Dave
|
74.30 | | OOLA::OUELLETTE | Roland, you've lost your towel! | Tue Sep 30 1986 15:22 | 6 |
| Set backs for 110/220V systems exist, but they are *big* (like
half of a large shoe box). At least that's what I think it was;
maybe it was a timer that turned off the water heater. Talk to
your electrician.
R.
|
74.31 | Line to low voltage converter | LATOUR::TREMBLAY | | Wed Oct 01 1986 09:26 | 13 |
| You can buy a "converter" box at a wholesale heating supplier that
converts 120v thermostat loops to low voltage. The whole assembly
is mounted in a utility box about 4" X 6" and is something that
demands to be installed out of sight, which makes it better for
older line voltage furnace usage where it can be mounted near the
burner. If you have multi-zoned electric heat, this unit is not
for you.
/Glenn
P.S. The unit I last installed was made by Rockwell. I'll try and
find the unit number (buried at home somewhere) and post it here.
|
74.32 | Weather Wizard at R.S. | POP::SUNG | Al Sung (Xway Development) | Mon Oct 06 1986 13:31 | 4 |
| Radio Shack is now selling the Weather Wizard under the Archer
name for $89. I saw it in the 1987 catalog.
-al
|
74.33 | 1-800-421-1130 | KELVIN::RPALMER | Handyman in Training | Tue Oct 07 1986 15:06 | 8 |
|
I also bought the RobertShaw T60-1044. I ran into some questions
replacing my old GE thermostat. The GE answer phone came up empty
but the RobertShaw 800 number was lots of help. They put me in
touch with someone in engineering who quickly answered my question.
I paid $65 fot the unit at Channel in Weymouth.
=Ralph=
|
74.34 | HOW MUCH SHOULD I SET TEMPERATURE BACK | CSMADM::MAY | | Thu Oct 09 1986 12:33 | 15 |
| I am convinced that its a worthwhile investment and from the notes
I have read, it looks like Channel has the best selection. I work
in Westford Mass and live in Ashburnham. Can anyone tell me where
the closest Channel store is?
Also, is setting the thermostat set-back temperature, is there a
point where the amount of energy to bring the house back to a
comfortable temp is more that the energy saved by setting it back
in the first place?? Are there any guidelines on how much and how
long for maximum effeciency?
Thanks
Bruce
|
74.35 | Chelmsford Channel store | TIGEMS::BROUILLETTE | MIKE BROUILLETTE | Thu Oct 09 1986 13:02 | 2 |
| There is one in Chelmsford on Rte 110.
|
74.36 | Honeywell replacement, how much setback ... | CYGNUS::DARRYL | | Thu Oct 09 1986 15:59 | 22 |
| re .25 - the 'Chronotherm battery problem'
I had a Honeywell Chronotherm for a few years. I was pleased with
its operation when it worked, but for some reason it died on roughly
an annual basis. Symptom was dead battery, but when I replaced the
battery, still no workie. So I called the Honeywell Customer Service
number (1-800-something). They said 'Oh, yes. We've had problems
with those clocks. How 'bout we send you a new one, and you return
the old one in the new one's box?' Great idea. I just got used to
replacing it about once each year, and Honeywell didn't seem to
mind.
re .34 - how much to set back
I heard a rule of thumb that said you save about 1-2% of your heat
bill for each degree of set back sustained 8 hours or more. In my
new house I have 3 zones (2 downstairs in main living area, 1 upstairs
with bedrooms). I have mine set so the downstairs can drop as much
as it wants to at night (15-20 degrees some nights), and the upstairs
drops 5 degrees from 9pm. through 5am. (while we're asleep), and
from 8:30am. through 2:30pm (while the kids are at school).
|
74.37 | old chronontherms | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Thu Oct 09 1986 19:02 | 2 |
| re -.1 A few years ago - they did have problems with their clocks on a few
models...which ones? THe ones being sold (cheap) at caldors and zayres
|
74.38 | Johnson Controls | PAXVAX::NAYLOR | Mark E. Naylor | Thu Oct 09 1986 22:44 | 10 |
| I bought a setback thermostat four years ago made by Johnson
Controls - they make HVAC control units. I think it cost
about $75 back then. It has a temp range from 50 to 95,
24 hour time range, 4 time selections to change temp within the
24 hour range (in half hour increments), and 7 rocker switches
(one per day) to enable/disable setback mode. No problems with
it so far.
Mark
|
74.39 | Chronotherm differences | SOFCAD::KNIGHT | Dave Knight | Fri Oct 10 1986 13:37 | 6 |
| You can tell the chronotherms that had problems from the newer models
by looking for a seconds hand on the clock. The ones with seconds
hands are the bad ones. The ones that don't have a seconds hand
are the updated ones. I replaced my old one several years ago with
a newer one (got it from the Honeywell 800 number) and haven't had
problems since.
|
74.40 | SETBACK = 10 degrees or less. | DSTAR::SMICK | Van Smick | Mon Oct 13 1986 14:24 | 26 |
| RE: .34 "HOW MUCH?"
A set back of 10 degrees is the break-even point -- according to most
sources. With a greater set back, you are spending more getting
the temp back up to "normal" than you saved during the "set-back"
period.
AN INTERESTING THOUGHT:
Clearly, this is an over-simplification -- since the calculation
would be different for every heating system and every house.
At the very least, the calculations would have to take into account:
- the operating cost of the heating system per "burn minute"
- the amount of burn time required to increase the house temp by
1 degree (a function of the average outside air temp, the rate at
which the house looses heat, insulation, infiltration barriers, etc)
- The duration of the set-back period
etc, etc, etc.
I know someone who has written a program to do such a calculation.
He does consultation to people who are considering adding insulation,
better windows, etc. I'll ask him if he would like to share it with
us!
|
74.41 | Software for energy calculations | FURILO::BLESSLEY | Life's too short for boring food | Tue Oct 14 1986 13:36 | 18 |
| < Note 397.40 by DSTAR::SMICK "Van Smick" >
-< SETBACK = 10 degrees or less. >-
.
.
.
I know someone who has written a program to do such a calculation.
He does consultation to people who are considering adding insulation,
better windows, etc. I'll ask him if he would like to share it with
us!
The MassSave program is done on a VMS system... they come in with a TI silent
700 terminal, dial-up (took several tries from Hudson, MA's then-all-mechanical
telephone switching system), and wizz-bang print out your report.
That's what we need!
-Scott
|
74.42 | | ALEX::CONN | Alex Conn | Fri Oct 17 1986 14:54 | 48 |
| 1. On the Chronotherm. The info about the 800 number is very
interesting. Honeywell sent *me* a form saying it would cost $39
for a replacement clock.
My model is a CT200A. By the way, I have found that clock is supposed
to run on two standard NiCad cells (about 2.6 volts) but mine (and a
number of the others that have failed) needs a bit more. Three cells
work just fine. The $10 or $12 official Honeywell battery failed (one
cell of it) in about a year. The Radio Shack AAA battery (about $4.50
a pair) is still going strong. I plan to replace the other part of the
Honeywell battery with a 3rd Radio Shack AAA NiCad when it goes out by
using the Dremel again to carve out more room.
As long as the clock continues to work on 3 batteries, I won't try to
get them to replace it. As long as I can use very inexpensive
replacement NiCads, I won't complain.
2. On setback degrees. The MassSave guy warned us against setting back
too far on very cold days with our former steam system. You could
reach a point where the system could not recover enough to reach the
normal comfort setting due to heat loss in the house and the slowness
of steam radiators. With the new FHW oil system, I think the problem
has gone away.
3. On the Robertshaw T60-1044. I talked to their Product Manager
(Chuck Little (1-800-421-1130)) and found out some interesting points:
this little thing is almost too smart! It remembers from the most
recent offset period how long it took to cool one degree and how
long the system took to warm the area one degree. From that it
calculates when to enter and leave an offset period! It readjusts
according to outside temperature since it is always sampling the
most recent heating and cool-down cycles.
The reason I say it may be too smart is that I think they took the
wrong approach for *entering* the offset period. They start cooling
down soon enough so that the temperature will *reach* the offset
temperature at the start of the offset period (with some maximum limit
of, say, an hour). I believe that the start of the offset period
should indicate when the system *starts* cooldown. However, entering
the normal "comfort" range works just fine with this method.
4. Yes, the Sears units are overpriced. Sears Best is $110. On the
best sale it only drops to $60. The Robertshaw unit (which I think is
better) sells normally at Channel for $65 and $60 on sale. Another
unit very similar in function to the Sears (I mentioned it in an
earlier reply) sells normally at Channel for $60.
Alex
|
74.43 | silly question | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Sat Nov 01 1986 17:13 | 4 |
| Question to those with one-button programming (the kind that have to
be set over the course of a week). Why can't you just fiddle with the
set-time knob to make a week go by real fast and program it in one
sitting?/j
|
74.44 | Damn computers! | JOET::JOET | | Sun Nov 02 1986 16:08 | 5 |
| re: .43
There is no such knob or adjustment.
-joet
|
74.45 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Sun Nov 02 1986 16:33 | 1 |
| then how do you set the time (like for daylight savings, etc)?
|
74.46 | | JOET::JOET | | Mon Nov 03 1986 12:21 | 5 |
| re: .45
Like, you don't.
-joet
|
74.47 | nl: | ALEX::CONN | Alex Conn, ZKO | Mon Nov 03 1986 17:21 | 14 |
| Re: .45
Yes, I asked that question about the Stanley units and decided not
to buy one.
I already had experience with one of those intelligent light switches
that is supposed to give a "lived in" look to your house, and learns
from a day's worth of on/off sequences. Each switch to/from day
light savings time reqires a reset of the thing since you can't
access the clock.
Baaaaaaaaah
Alex
|
74.48 | Electronic Thermostats and FHW Heat | HAZEL::THOMAS | | Sat Nov 22 1986 22:26 | 26 |
| A note concerning electronic thermostats and zoned forced hot water (hydronic)
systems. Aparrantly the zone valves intermittently interrupt power to the
thermostat circuit when the system is running. This causes problems for some
electronic thermostats which depend on the 60Hz power for the clock.
The Sears Weekender is one. After buying one I found out I needed a special
relay for $14 to maintain power during interuptions and it was not in stock so
I gave them back the thermostat. It will run on battery backup but does not
keep good time (no quartz clock) and eats the 9V batteries quickly.
I looked at the Robert Shaw T60-1042 (same as T60-1044 but for heat only) at
Somereville Lumber and it says on the box that it is not recommended for zone
type hydronic (FHW) systems so I didn't persue that one any further.
I also tried out a no-name thermostat from K-Mart. Forget it. It's very
difficult to program and has no program overide control. It uses ni-cads for
backup and seemed to work okay but I brought it back because of the lack of
program overide which I consider a serious deficiency.
I wound up with the Jameson Energenius E200. It doesn't mind the power
interruptions or put undue drain on the 9V backup battery. I installed two of
them a month ago and they work great. They are very easy to program and program
modifications take only a few seconds. They are on sale at Rich's 11/28-30 and
are also available at Channel.
- Rich
|
74.49 | Low-tech | ANT::TRANDOLPH | | Thu Dec 11 1986 17:07 | 5 |
| Crusin' through this file and found this note.
I tried the timer/night light trick with my "gas log" heater. Now
I'm getting a 6-8 degree setback while I'm at work. For a total
of $3. Incredible. -Tom R.
|
74.224 | Temp/Setback-does is save $$$? | BPOV09::SJOHNSON | Steve | Mon Dec 22 1986 09:18 | 31 |
|
I'd like to get a definitive answer to a question concerning setting
your thermostat back twice a day, DOES IT SAVE MONEY OR NOT??
This issue was touched on in a previous Home_Work note, but didn't
arrive at a conclusion. I just bought a digital auto-setback
thermostat (i won't say what brand to keep to the point).
I have set for 70 degrees for the comfort zone (weekeday evenings,
2 hours weekday mornings, and weekend daytime) and 60 degrees for
the economy (while sleeping, at work)
The stat kicked on (as programmed) at 5 am to bring the house from
60 to 70 degrees, but when I got up at 6:15, it was only 66 degrees
in the house. Granted, it was a pretty chilly morning, about 15
degrees out. By 7 am, when it was to shut down to go back to 60,
the temp still hadn't reached 70 - I have oil fhw heat.
Point is --> the system ran for two solid hours after
cooling down, trying to heat the house.
I've heard both sides of the story: setting back uses MORE energy
to heat back up. and setting back saves 5-10% for "2 8 hour
setbacks of 10 degrees."
Would someone who has the cold hard facts please come forward?
Thank You
Steve
|
74.225 | Not a thermostat prob. | STAR::FARNHAM | Uninformed Speculation Unlimited | Mon Dec 22 1986 09:46 | 20 |
|
If my heating system ran for 2 hours without bringing the
temperature up 10 degrees, I wouldn't blame the thermostat. I'd
look to the heating system itself. Is the high temperature on your
aquastat set high enough (as discussed elsewhere, the HW temperature
should be set relative to the low outside temp)? Is there air in
the pipes preventing water flow? Are your baseboards blocked, either
by furniture or by dust on the fins? Is your system large enough
for the area to be heated? Are your zone valves/circulator running?
What about insultaion/storm windows/doors?
In other words, your thermostat did its job. There's something else
that's causing the problem.
Also, all the models I've seen suggest a 10 degree setback as being
optimal for this part of the country (central N.E.)
Stu
|
74.226 | trying to save oil | BPOV09::SJOHNSON | Steve | Mon Dec 22 1986 10:16 | 10 |
|
Stu, thanks for the input. I wasn't necessarily blaming the stat
for the slow heating. I do believe that my system needs more work.
Maybe you only get the savings if your system is running efficiently?
(no air in pipes, fins clean, etc.) I have the hi-lo temps for
the boiler at 180/120. Suggestions otherwise?
Steve
|
74.227 | | STAR::FARNHAM | Uninformed Speculation Unlimited | Mon Dec 22 1986 10:51 | 8 |
|
The 180/120 sounds OK to me (in fact, the 180 sounds a bit high,
and so should not cause the slow-heat problem you're complaining
about).
If your system is in poor working order, it will be inefficient
whenever it is working. The thermostat should not be a factor.
|
74.228 | check these...? | AMULET::YELINEK | | Mon Dec 22 1986 11:35 | 53 |
| Steve,
I'm assuming you have a tankless system from the hi/low temp settings
you mentioned. My heating contractor said that 200 deg was sufficient
for my system which is used to heat the house only. My domestic hot
water is heated in a separate oil-fired unit where the hi setting
is ~160-180 deg or somewhere in the vicinity.
A couple of things you might want to consider are:
Air in the system. I understand, from my contractor, that no
corrosion will accumulate in the pipes as long as there is very
little air as its the air that causes the copper to oxidize causing
crud and eventually affecting the heat transfer. This also depends
upon the amount of 'make up' water required by your system.
If you do have the TANKLESS system, depending on how old the
system is, and the quality of the water in your area, perhaps the
problem lies here......My contractor favored the separate oil-fired
unit for a couple of reasons.....
1) he has a tankless in his house and didn't like it as he needed
to clean out the unit after only two years of operation. This
was because of the build up of 'scales' within the tankless (from
the well water) which cut down the heat transfer. His input was
well taken so I opted for the oil-fired unit even though its
cost was greater than the incremental cost of the tankless.
2) Also, with the tankless you are required to maintain boiler
temperature year round, the same for all you guys out there with
the super-duper Boilermates. I personally favor the separate
oil-fired unit over the Boilermate but the boilermate would
be my next choice.
Anyway, the other component you might want to check is the setting
of the 'heat anticipator'. This setting provides for the amount
of hysterisis in the heating cycle. That is, the amount of overshoot
in degrees that the system is told to go to BEYOND the set temp.
on the thermostat. This setting is located behind the cover of your
thermostat and is usually set to the current rating of your primary
control. This is the black cover usually sitting right on top of
the burner. Remove the 2 screws closest to the boiler (1st make
sure the power is killed!!) and swing the control back and the sticker
or nameplate has this number on it. Most data sheets I've seen indicate
a setting of .4 corresponding to .4 amps fron the primary. My
thermostats came pre-set to .38 from the factory. Anyway....set
it a hair greater to extend the cycle. More questions..? this is
the place.
Mark
|
74.229 | more questions | BPOV09::SJOHNSON | Steve | Mon Dec 22 1986 12:34 | 51 |
|
Mark, thanks for the info.
First, no one has said that setback thermostats DON'T save energy,
so, I'll assume that people who say that it takes more energy to
bring the temp back to normal (70) from a low setting than leaving
it at 70 all the time are wrong. (during 24 hour periods only).
Well, you asked for it, so here it is:
1. Bleeding air from system. The first floor has bleeder valves
each room. No problem. The second floor: I have not been
able to locate one single solitary bleeder on the 2nd floor,
I checked every room, both ends of the heating element. There
must be some air in the 2nd floor line, but how do I bleed it?
Do plumbers sometimes put them in weird places, or simply forget
to put them in? The 2nd floor heating pipes make one continuous
loop around the perimeter of the house, going through walls.
Unlike the 1st in which each room picks off from the main piping
just below the floor (cellar ceiling). This is a 65 yr old
house.
This may not explain the slo heat problem on FLR 1 though, as
those have been bled (I'll do it again to make sure). Each
floor is a separate zone, run off separate circulators/stats.
2. I don't know the difference between tankless and with tank(?)
boilers. Does a tankLESS heat the water as it is being pumped
through a pipe from the circulator and them out to the heating
zone with no tank per se? This may be what I have. I have
temp and pressure gauges, adjustments for hi(shutoff) and low
(start-up) water temps. and a third adjustment which I've
never moved for fear of blowing the place up. It is adjustable
from ~10 to ~25 whatever. This may be what you spoke of.
3. Once I've reached a certain set temp, it holds that temp
fantastic, with no real swings. i.e., constantly going from
68-72-68-72-68, when set at 70. So i wouldn't think that would
be the problem.
4. The fins could stand a cleaning for sure, I'll work on that.
I have storms, there are no major drafts, and I don't know
for sure what insulation is in the walls. The cellar ceiling
is not insulated.
See what you can do with this.
Steve
|
74.230 | NO HEAT | WORDS::MCLAUGHLI | | Mon Dec 22 1986 12:40 | 7 |
| STEVE,
ON YOUR PROBLEM OF HEAT, YES THEY DO SAVE MONEY BUT??????
IT SOUNDS LIKE A PROBLEM I HAD. DID YOU CHECK THE ZONE VALVES FOR
PROPER OPERATION. SOUNDS DUMB, BUT I HAD ONE THAT PLUGED AND THE
HEAT WAS NOT GETTING TO THE PROPER PLACE. ALSO YOU SHOULD CHECK
THE AIR BLEEDER ON THE EXPANSION TANK.
|
74.231 | expansion tank? | BPOV09::SJOHNSON | Steve | Mon Dec 22 1986 12:46 | 10 |
| re:.6
I don't have zone valves, at least i don't think so. What do they
look like (sounds even dumber, huh?)
Also, please elaborate on the expansion tank. How does this bugger
function? You say it needs bleeding?
Steve
|
74.232 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | Tony Priborsky | Mon Dec 22 1986 14:40 | 8 |
| re: .0:
Expecting a 10 degree rise in temperature in 1.25 hours is a bit
much, especially with forced hot water. You're right in a certain
respect - the two hours of solid burn time will cost you more.
You're better off with a smaller drop back - 3� to 5�. It's still
enough to save you money, but not so much that it takes two hours
to recover.
|
74.233 | | CLT::BENNISON | Victor Bennison, ZKO2-3/M31, 381-2156 | Mon Dec 22 1986 14:49 | 7 |
| with a FHW system it might take 2 hours to bring the temp up, but
it shouldn't be "solid burn". It should burn for awhile to heat
the water, circulate it for awhile, then heat it some more. Our burner
never goes on for more then a few minutes at a time. After all,
when you turn your thermostat up, the water in the system should
already be pretty hot. In fact, depending on when you turn up the
thermostat, the burner might not even kick in, just the circulators.
|
74.234 | not solid burn time | BPOV09::SJOHNSON | Steve | Mon Dec 22 1986 15:40 | 12 |
| re:.8, .9
Thanks for the input, but I should have been more clear in .0
The system ran for two hours, but it wasn't solid burn time as you
thought I meant. The water was circulating for two hours, burner
kicking on periodically. I guess you're both saying that fhw systems
inherently take more time to heat up, as opposed to forced hot air
which should heat up much quicker.
Steve
|
74.235 | Air makes gurgling noise | NUWAVE::SUNG | Merry Xway | Mon Dec 22 1986 16:31 | 13 |
| If you have air in the upstairs pipes, you usually hear a gurgling
noise. Anyway, fewer and fewer plumbers are installing bleed valves
in a particular zone. In this case, you need to bleed the system
from a faucets near the furnace, located directly above the zone
valves.
OK, so you want to know what a zone valve looks like. They're a
solenoid actuated valve within 1-2 feet of the furnace. Should
be very obvious since the thermostat (red/white) wires are attached
to them. The most common ones have a greenish/turqoise cover on
them and measure 2"x2"x4"
-al
|
74.236 | | ALEX::ALEX | Alex Conn, ZKO | Mon Dec 22 1986 22:07 | 14 |
| 2 hours is a bit long even for FHW. However, if it is cycling on and
off, you are probably saving money as compared to having it on higher
all night.
180 degrees is a bit low, according to the fact sheet packed with our
system. 190 or 200 will heat faster. (You can get by with lower
settings if you have warmer outside temperature, better insulation, or
more radiation area.)
Many modern systems have a float type air vent which is supposed to get
rid of air in the system without having to bleed. It should be located
right next to the pipe that rises from your boiler to your zone valves.
Alex
|
74.237 | ZONE VALVE/BLEEDER | WORDS::MCLAUGHLI | | Wed Dec 24 1986 08:38 | 14 |
| RE:8
NOT ALL FHW SYSTEMS HAVE ELECTRICAL ZONE VALVES, MINE ARE
MECHANICAL. ON MY SYSTEM IF I FOLLOW THE RETURN LINE FROM THE BOILER
YOU WILL CAME TO A JUNCTION WERE THE FEED PIPES COME TOGETHER. AT
THIS POINT IS WHERE MY VALVES ARE LOCATED. I ALSO HAVE DRAINS FOR
THE SYSTEM LOCATED HERE. THE VALVES I HAVE ARE INLINE 1/4 TURN TO
SHUT OFF OR OPEN EACH ZONE. BEING YOU HAVE A SECOND FLOOR THERE
IS A GOOD CHANCE YOU HAVE ELECTRICAL ONES.
THE EXPANSION TANK IS USUALLY LOCATED JUST ABOVE THE BOILER.
SINCE EXPANSION TANKS VARY THE AIR BLEEDER MIGHT BE DIFFERENT BUT
USUALLY THEY ARE ON TOP. THEY HAVE A SMALL CAP LOOKS LIKE A CAR
TUBE CAP. JUST UNSCREW THIS SLOWLY AND YOU CAN HEAR THE AIR.
|
74.238 | sideways fins | BPOV09::SJOHNSON | Steve | Wed Dec 24 1986 09:16 | 15 |
|
In the process of cleaning out the fins on the baseboard heat, I
found out why my bathroom doesn't heat up real good. This is my
first winter in the house.
You'll get a chuckle out of this.
The fins were installed 45 DEGREES OUT OF PHASE, OR SIDEWAYS!
Since heat travels up, and not across, it won't supply much heat
that way. And the system has been there since 1963, according to
the papers I found down cellar. I can't imagine why the previous
owner(s) didn't notice or fix this!
Steve
|
74.239 | One case where setbacks are not suggested | DSSDEV::REINIG | August G. Reinig | Wed Dec 24 1986 12:06 | 8 |
| The only time I've heard people say that you shouldn't turn back the
thermostat is when you use a heat pump. Heat pumps are not good at
heating a place quickly. If required to do so, they may kick in the
auxiliary heat source, usually electric resistance, to do the job. The
cost to reheat the house using the auxiliary heat source is more
than the cost to keep the house warm using the heat pump.
August G. Reinig
|
74.50 | SEARS Relay? Need it? | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Mon Dec 29 1986 11:50 | 10 |
| DO you remember the Make/Part Number of that RELAY that you were
told was need for the Weekender Thermostat with Zone Valves? I went
to SEARS and they had one for 34.95 and it didn't SEEM to be what
I wanted. Was it? Am I just getting the wrong price? What problems
will I have with the Thermostat AS-IS, (Providing that I don't mind
changing the 9-volt batteries every few months)
Any ideas for RELAYS ??
Mark
|
74.240 | Reply to 661.2 | SARLAC::HARTWELL | Dave Hartwell | Mon Dec 29 1986 12:11 | 9 |
| in reference to 661.2::
I believe that you may want to reconsider having the low setting
at 120. I have a high effiecency FHW boiler and it specifically
states that the low setting should not be less than 140 as extended
running at temps below 140 can cause rusting of the cast iron sections.
Dave
|
74.241 | Reply to 6661.9 | SARLAC::HARTWELL | Dave Hartwell | Mon Dec 29 1986 12:26 | 7 |
| With respect to 661.9, what you do want is for the burner to run
as long as possible, with few stops and starts during the time that
the thermostat is calling for heat. To accomplish this, a smaller
nozzle is used on the burner. Hence less oil is burned during run
time, and less heat is produced when it runs. The longer the boiler
can run, the better the overall efficientcy.
|
74.51 | Try the catalog | HAZEL::THOMAS | This space for rent | Mon Dec 29 1986 15:28 | 7 |
| The recommended relay is listed in the Sears catalog. I'll try to
remember to look it up and post the catalog number. Other than changing
batteries and correcting the clock periodically I am not aware of
any other problems using it as is.
- Rich
|
74.242 | hi-lo dilemna | BPOV09::SJOHNSON | Steve | Tue Dec 30 1986 11:24 | 19 |
| re .16
That's interesting, I had it down at 120 because Mass Save recommended
that you set the lower limit of the water temp down at 110 or 120
so that as much heat as possible "will be drawn out of the water"
before it is reheated, for fuel savings. I also think that both the
lower and upper
temp settings are a factor in how quickly your house heats up.
Regarding the hi-lo boiler settings,
Maybe, with FHW, you either can have quick heat up (higher temp
settings) OR econo (lower temp settings) but not both at once.
Why would a low temp cause pipes to rust, I wonder. Maybe some
subtle chemical reaction which is activated at 120F?
|
74.243 | Reply to .18 | SARLAC::HARTWELL | Dave Hartwell | Wed Dec 31 1986 09:06 | 23 |
| It's not the pipes that rust, it's the heat exchanger that rusts.
My guess is that the low water temp allows condensation to form
on the cast iron heat exchanger. Rember that water is a product
of combustion. The higher temp would allow the water to remain in
a vapor state and thus flow up the chimmney, or at least condense
someplace other than on the heat exchanger.
From what I have read (with gas heat) the early high efficentcy
furnaces had lots of problems with the heat exchangers rusting out
very quickly. This was due to the formation of water and an acid
(not sure which acid), which as you can guess raised hell. High
efficientcy furnaces, and boilers waste little heat up the smoke
stack. Most of the heat energy is used to heat your house.
Dave Hartwell
PS: I just looked over my literature last night, it stated that
if a lower than 140 degree temp was used that one should install
a bypass pipe between the hot water outlet to the return just before
the circulator. This would insure that the heat exchanger would
stay hot enough to discourage the formation of water.
|
74.268 | Need Robertshaw's address | VIDEO::KUMAR | | Wed Mar 25 1987 17:12 | 9 |
|
I have a Robertshaw setback thermostat (nicad type) which started
smoking and doesn't work any more.
- Anyone have the manufacturer's address?
- Also, what are the warranty terms? and charges for
out-of warranty repairs?
Thanks.
|
74.269 | address | BARNUM::PHURD | | Thu Mar 26 1987 15:37 | 10 |
|
try:
Robertshaw Controls Co.
Tennessee Div, Dept G
2318 Kingston Pike
Knoxville TN 37916
(615) 546-0550
|
74.53 | If it works, GREAT! | NETCOM::HARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Fri Apr 03 1987 12:56 | 8 |
| I was cautioned in do this as the current rating of the SEARS DIGITAL
setback was on the threshold of the TACO zone valves... Yes it would
work, but it might just shorten the life of the Thermostat.
(thermostat rated upto 1.0A, valve is .9A... very close)
If it works though, great!
Mark
|
74.54 | Weekender II | STEREO::DINATALE | | Mon Sep 21 1987 17:24 | 11 |
| Just bought a Sears Weekender II on sale last week. Installation
went fine until I came up with a blue wire ??? The instructions
said if a B wire was used then the unit couldn't be installed on
the system or somthing to that fact. Just out of curiosity I went
down to the furnace to take a look... The blue wire wasn't connected
to anything!! What a relief, I hate returning things.
Other than waiting for the begining of the weekday/weekend cycle
to start so it can be put on auto. It's been worth the $$.
Richard
|
74.156 | Relay for setback thermostat ?? | AMUSE::QUIMBY | | Mon Feb 22 1988 10:55 | 18 |
| I'm looking at installing a setback thermostat, the Sears electronic
with alternate weekend program.
When you install this with a multi-zone FHW system or gas with
elect. ignition, you need a relay -- this is presumably to isolate
the thermostat electronics from the boiler/furnace control
electronics (?).
Anyway, the system in question is single-zone with domestic hot
water coil (yech, but there it is).
Since the furnace comes roaring on when you draw hot water, I am
assuming that the presence of the domestic coil means control
circuitry like a multi-zone, and that I should use the relay.
Any thoughts ????
dq
|
74.157 | Mine works ok | CENSRD::SCANLAND | Elvis needs boats | Mon Feb 22 1988 15:14 | 13 |
| Sounds exactly like my situation, even the same thermostat.
I installed the thermostat two winters ago. I remember reading
something about the relay in the instructions. "you've got to be
kidding" I thought and installed the thermostat anyway. No mods
whatsoever.
Works fine, no problems.
Chuck
disclaimer: If yours is ruined because you didn't install a protective
relay I'm not responsible.
|
74.158 | Leave it to SEARS! | VLNVAX::SUMNER | Senility has set in | Mon Feb 22 1988 21:28 | 15 |
| I installed a SEARS "weekender" several years ago and had the same
thoughts when I came to the relay part of the directions. I always
had a bear of a time when I would order something from SEARS so
I decided to try the thermostat without the relay. The only problem
that I have encountered is when the furnace is on the power from
the funace to the thermostat is cut off. This causes drain on the
backup 9 volt battery and eventually the clock looses time, perhaps
2 or 3 minutes a week.
p.s. I use the word SEARS in past tense only because of their service.
the last straw was when I ordered a chain-saw and they sent
me baby crib! I wouldn't have minded as much but every idiot
working in the store insisted the crib was mine even though
the order slip said differently!
|
74.159 | Other options ... | TOOK::ARN | | Tue Feb 23 1988 09:26 | 19 |
| I don't know if you have purchased the Sears model yet, but I thought
I would share my experience. The first unit I put in was a Honeywell.
It cost around $70 and just like in the last reply about the Sears
model, every time the furnace comes on, the 24v is cut to the
thermostat and the unit must run off the batteries. This would cause
this unit to loose time and eat batteries. Eventually, only after
a month and one battery later, the unit went crazy and eventually
died. I brought it back and bought the RobertShaw model, on sale
at $39.95. It has been in for three months with no problems. It
must draw less current from the batteries because in all this time
it hasn't lost a minute. I have an OLD (1930's) oil fired boiler
and thought I would need a relay too. Something about being old
and drawing a lot of current I guess. Anyway, I installed it without
one and have had no problems. I tought I would just mention this
because I think it would be a real pain to constantly reset the
clock and put in new batteries with the Sears model.
Tim
|
74.160 | Another, different experience ... you'll just have to give it a try. | TALLIS::KOCH | Kevin Koch LTN1-2/B17 DTN226-6274 | Tue Feb 23 1988 09:59 | 7 |
| I bought the Sears top-of-the-line programmable thermostat. I, too,
pondered over the relay. It works fine without it. I have a 1930's
converted coal furnace, GHW, with a Beckett burner and old fashioned stack
switch. In my particular case, the thermostat is powered whether the
burner is on or off, EXCEPT that the power is interrupted for 38 seconds
after the burner shuts off. The battery has been riding through these 38
second interrupts for a couple of months now.
|
74.161 | criteria for relay | GCANYN::GIGUERE | | Tue Feb 23 1988 12:43 | 12 |
| I purchased a Robert Shaw model for $39.95 at Spag's. I also had
to get a Sears relay for the furnace. The Robert Shaw model is
designed for 22 ACv to 30 ACv signals (ideal 24 ACv). I had to get the
Sears relay because I was only getting a 14 ACv signal from the
furnace.
My advise is to buy the thermostat (I like the RobertShaw) and get
a Voltmeter. If the signal from the furnace is less than recommended
then you will have to buy a relay. Otherwise, you can save the
$30.00.
SRG
|
74.162 | Robert Shaw info: 1-800-421-1130 | ALEX::CONN | Alex Conn, ZKO | Tue Feb 23 1988 15:37 | 0 |
74.163 | | ULTRA::PRIBORSKY | That's the stuff dreams are made of. | Mon Feb 29 1988 09:54 | 31 |
| I have two Sears Weekenders and had to get the relays.
At first, I only had one thermostat and one zone. The thermostat
controlled the circulator pump. I didn't need the relay in this
environment.
Then, I added a second zone, and went to zone valves. This uses one
circulator pump, and the zone valves open or close to control the flow
through the appropriate circuit. In this arrangement, the thermostat
controls the zone valves, and the zone valves (in parallel) control the
circulator pump. In this arrangement, from observation with a
voltmeter and a little speculation, the thermostat opens the zone
valve, which stays open for "a while". While open, the zone valve
needs the 24V to energize the relay, and thus keeps power away from the
thermostat. Eventually, the zone valve relay closes and gives power
back to the thermostat, which, as far as it is concerned, is still
"closed circuit", which opens the zone valve again. This repeats until
the thermostat opens and the zone valve stays open because the
thermostat is. This choppy action results in the thermostat running
from the batteries about 90% of the time while the thermostat calls for
heat. My batteries lasted about a month.
Now, when you put the external relay in the circuit, the thermostat
thinks its load is the relay, and the relay's load is the zone valve.
Since the power interruption is on the load side of the relay, the
thermostat doesn't see it, and your batteries last forever (well,
at least 1.25 years so far.)
If I were doing it again, I'd just go with another circulator pump.
By the time I bought the relays, the savings of the zone valve over
the extra pump was cancelled...
|
74.164 | Three on a match... | USWAV3::FAGERBERG | | Tue Mar 01 1988 16:04 | 8 |
|
In the spirit of one-upsmanship, or plain stupidity, whichever
you prefer, I have three RobertShaw programmables for three seperate
zone valve zones. One is for both air conditioning and heat, the
other two heat only. They would eat batteries like M&M's until
I installed parallel relays. It took three seperate calls to RS
until they solved the problem. I couldn't be happier with the results
or dealing with RobertShaw.
|
74.165 | New Sears transformer/relay | AMUSE::QUIMBY | | Wed Mar 02 1988 13:28 | 13 |
| When I wrote the original question, I had only seen Sears'
complicated relay -- a Honeywell originally intended to plug into
a heating/cooling system, to which you need to add an external
transformer, etc.
They now have a small, integrated transformer/relay unit for $12,
which plugs into a wall outlet and is then wired between the
thermostat and the furnace. This makes it a 5-minute (or less)
job. I put it in -- it *may* not be needed, but will eliminate
the possibility of an oil serviceman saying the screwy electronic
thermostat is interfering with his control system!
dq
|
74.166 | Prices are important | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Wed Mar 02 1988 21:56 | 15 |
| To add to this discussion and comparisons, the prices seem to be
factors when choosing the right way to go:
Thermostat (ie, Sears or RobertShaw or Honeywell) $40-80
'Sears' Relay for isolation and constant AC to Therm $12.95
Zone Valves $35-50
Circulator Pumps $35-50
9volt batteries (8-) $.60-$1.99
I went with the Sears Digital, Sears Relay, 1 circulator pump and
two zone valves... Works two years now, not a minute off timing,
not a day without the proper heat!
Mark
|
74.167 | Another advantage of circulators rather than valves | ALEX::CONN | Alex Conn, ZKO | Wed Mar 09 1988 16:02 | 30 |
| RE: .7 and replies.
It appears that with zone valves, you'd better plan on relays. I went
with circulators because I was told that it was more reliable. If a
circulator pump went out, you'd still get heat in the other zones. Now
that I know that I also saved on relays, I am happier.
By the way, I wish the note somewhere in this file had been written
before we had the FHW system installed. Using all circulator pumps has
an advantage over valves in addition to simple reliability. You can
make the following configuration at pump site (ignoring other valves, etc.):
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| |______ T _________| |______ T _________| |
| ______|X|_________ ______|X|_________ |
| | Valve A | | Valve B | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
(P) Pump A (P) Pump B (P) Pump C
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
With the above configuration, if there is a failure in pump A, you need
simply open valve A and pump B can run both both zones 1 and 2, until
you can fix the pump. Even with two pump failures, A�� D�
�'1� C ��7 | |_ T _ | |_ T _ | |�7 | _ |X|_ _ |X|_ |�7 | | Valve A | | Valve B | |�H ||||||
|
74.55 | Robertshaw fails from household static sparks | DELNI::GOLDSTEIN | Follow flock, become lampchop | Mon Mar 28 1988 13:10 | 17 |
| Another winter passes...
I bought a Robershaw digital last year, with lots of membrane keys
and two setbacks per day. Sure it takes a computer scientist to
program it, I didn't mind. But when I went away on a business trip
last month, and the humidity was low (winter dryness), I discovered
a reason I'll never get another!
Whenever you touch the wall underneath it, where the wire runs behind
the plaster, the spark from your body zaps the memory! It gets
seriously random. For example, the "day" temperature at one time
jumped to 83 degrees (in the EPROM) and the offsets to 49, with
such nice on-times as 49:33 (AM or PM?). This did not make my wife
happy...
The new house will get a mechanical one. Viva analog!
fred
|
74.168 | ISOLATION RELAY DETAILS? | ADVLSI::N_FIELD | | Wed Oct 12 1988 16:23 | 16 |
| RELATIVE TO .9-
1.DO YOU HAVE THE SEARS PART NUMBER FOR THE INTEGRATED
RELAY/TRANSFORMER?
2.WHEN WIRING THE TRANSFORMER IN, HOW MANY WIRES ENDED UP AT THE
THERMOSTAT UNIT? WAS IT TWO ORIGINALLY AND YOU HAD TO ADD MORE IN
THE WALL?
I ASK AS I AM HAVING TROUBLE FIGURING OUT HOW TO ADD THE ISOLATION
RELAY WITHOUT MORE THAN TWO WIRES IN TOTAL GOING TO THE THERMOSTAT.
THANKS,
NORM
|
74.56 | SET-BACK THERMOSTAT FOR HEAT PUMPS | THOTH::BONETTI | Springs around the corner | Fri Oct 14 1988 15:08 | 18 |
| For those of you that have a heat pump as a heating source know
that this type of heating does not allow you to use a set-back
thermostat. A conventional set-back thermostat would prove to
be too costly in controlling the heat pump. A new thermostat
made for heat pumps is now available. Below is the info. They
are expensive but then again they may be worth the cost.
Digistat HP2000
American Stabilis Inc
P.O. Box 1289
Lewiston, ME
I am sure that they are available locally.
Basically the way that this thermostat works is that it ramps the
temperature up from the setback temperature in 0.5 degree increments
starting up to 2 hours before setup time. By doing it this way it
avoids turning on the backup heating source.
|
74.57 | set-backs for all elec. house? | SALEM::DOTY | Big Al, DTN: 261-3223 | Mon Oct 17 1988 14:37 | 9 |
|
I have a total electric house with thermostats in each room
and was looking for a set-back thermostat that will work with
a 220v thermostat but have been unable to find one.
Has anyone had any experience with this. Earlier in this note
it was mentioned but never really answered.
Al
|
74.58 | no high voltage setback thermostats | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Mon Oct 17 1988 18:49 | 26 |
| I believe no one makes a high voltage (110/220) set back thermostat. There
are a couple of reasons that make them unfeasable. For one, there is one
in every room. This isn't because the builders wanted you to have many
zones for your extreme comfort and convenience; it's because the
thermostats are a dime a dozen and there is no central heating plant to
control. At any rate, you'd have to buy too many. People wouldn't buy
them for that reason and also because one would have to run around the
house to set them all or modify the settings. Another is that high voltage
doesn't lend itself to being easily contoled with new fancy digital
controls, relays would have to be used which complicates the many you have
to buy etc.
Here's the invention that needs to be invented. A central microprocessed
unit which sends radio frequency signals to indiviually controlled remote
high voltage thrermostats similar to todays type. All the technology
exists already but it hasn't been packaged up nicely (and simply) enough to
make a product. I bet it would sell for big bucks. Anybody, want to go in
on this together? You make it a reality and market it, then send me the
money. We'll be partners!
btw, i'm sure this won't work with radiant ceiling heat which is
agonizingly slow to respond to large temperature differences.
Craig
|
74.59 | | BINKLY::WINSTON | Jeff Winston (Hudson, MA) | Mon Oct 17 1988 22:12 | 3 |
| they do make electronic thermostats that fit over the hi-voltage ones
with little motorized levers that adjust the thermostat. no kidding.
now, if someone could figure out a central control system for these...
|
74.60 | First Alert or X-10 | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Tue Oct 18 1988 09:54 | 12 |
| The motorized lever devices Jeff mentions are made by First Alert.
There are models for round thermostats too.
An alternative is a a device made to be used with the X-10 home
power control system - it consists of a small unit that sits under
your thermostat and, during the setback period, a small heating
element warms the air under the thermostat, fooling it into
thinking it is warmer. These can be controlled from a central
console. X-10 devices (and there are lots of them) are discussed
in the ATSE::X-10 conference. (Press KP7 to add it to your notebook.)
Steve
|
74.61 | Here's a way | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue Oct 18 1988 10:13 | 13 |
| A simpler solution might be to replace the 220V electric thermostat
with a low voltage relay/transformer. These are pretty commonly
available since not all installations want to run hefty cable to
a thermostat and then to the heaters. The relay mounts in the
baseboard and conventional low-voltage wiring runs to the thermostat.
If you buy this as a "low voltage electric heating thermostat" you
might have to take a package containing the thermostat itself, which
you will then throw away because you want to use a setback thermostat.
An even cheaper approach would be to buy a 16V AC relay or contactor
rated at sufficient current @220V for your application plus a cheap
16V doorbell transformer.
|
74.62 | | BPOV02::S_JOHNSON | Buy guns, not butter | Fri Oct 21 1988 17:21 | 12 |
|
I bought my parents a Sears Weekender II to use on their FHA/oil system,
and I couldn't get it to work, i.e., it wouldn't even make the furnace turn on
at all. All there were were two wires hooked to the old Honeywell thermostat.
I know the unit works, because I tried it on my FHW/oil system.
Does the Weekender need additional hardware to make it work with a FHA system???
Thanks,
Steve
|
74.63 | More info please | DELNI::MHARRIS | Mark Jay Harris, Term Srvr Mktg Mgr | Mon Oct 24 1988 12:58 | 6 |
| What DOES it do? Does the display turn on? Does the On/Off light
come on at a given temp?
More info please...\
Mark
|
74.64 | Check the Voltage at the wires to the Thermostat | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Mon Oct 24 1988 13:45 | 8 |
|
Test the voltage across the wires at the thermostat. Maybe it's
different from the voltage that the Weekender is designed for.
Most thermostats take 24 Volts (plus or minus about 3 Volts),
but some take 12V or something else.
-tm
|
74.65 | | BPOV06::S_JOHNSON | Buy guns, not butter | Mon Oct 24 1988 16:53 | 14 |
| re .63, .64
All the displays come on, everything works great, except that the furnace
won't kick on.
I spoke to the resident heating expert here in our plant and he recommended
to check the voltage present at the 2 wires, as .64 mentioned, and see if its
within spec of the Weekender.
I won't going home to Mom and Dad's till Xmas, so I'll report back in 2 months!
Thanks
Steve
|
74.66 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Ad Astra | Mon Oct 24 1988 20:30 | 12 |
| I have the Weekender II thermostat (this is the "Sears Best" model,
right?) on my FHA furnace/AC and it works just great. The instructions
do warn that some furnaces will need a separate relay that Sears sells.
This will be if the power to the thermostat is disconnected while the
furnace is running.
If this doesn't pan out, perhaps you have it wired incorrectly. Did
you follow the instructions carefully and label each wire as you
removed it from the old thermostat? (I didn't, but guessed lucky when
installing the new one!)
Steve
|
74.244 | Why a setback saves money. | WOODRO::BERKNER | Tom Berkner 264-7942 MK01 | Mon Nov 14 1988 10:59 | 25 |
| Yes, temperature setback does save fuel and money.
As an example, if you have a wall which has an insulation value
of R20 (3 1/2" fiberglass + insulating sheeting + sheetrock + siding
+ air layers) it has a u value of .05 BTU/hour/sq.ft./deg F. u = 1 / R.
If the outside temp is 20 deg and inside is 70, the differential
is 50. 50 x .05 = 2.5 BTU/hour/sq.ft. If your room is 10x10 with
8' walls and two walls exposed to outside (a corner room) you have
160 sq ft of wall. 2.5 + 160 = 400 BTU/hour. (one cubic foot of
natural gas is around 1000 BTUs)
If the inside temp is reduced to 60 degrees, the equation becomes
40 deg x 160 sq.ft. x .05 BTU/hour/sq.ft/deg = 320 BTU/hour.
From this you can see that there is a direct (and proportional)
relationship between heat loss and inside to outside temperature
differential.
Granted this is a trivial example since I didn't include ceilings,
floors, infiltration and fenestration; but the result would remain
the same. The smaller the temperature differential, the less heat
transfer (heat loss) takes place.
|
74.169 | Help with buzzing switches on thermo install! | NATASH::WEIGL | | Mon Dec 05 1988 21:40 | 32 |
| I just bought a variant of the Robert Shaw mentioned earlier in
this note, and tried to install it on a 2-wire heat-only, zoned
by circulator pumps system. The unit has two 1.5V AA batteries
inside. Everything I can see around the funace looks like 24V,
including the documentation.
So, I installed it w/o a relay. The result was that when I
turned back on the circuits by the furnace, I get a loud
hum/rattle out of the switchboxes which control that zone.
Clearly something is not right. I tried switching the wires just
to see if I'd gotten them reversed, but same thing.
Is this a symptom of needing a relay? I want to install others
(I bought 3) for the system, but now am not sure what's required
to do it. I checked the voltage across the terminal wires, and
get 24V when the system is not running, and that drops down to
3-4V when it IS running.
Now what's weird about this is that I already have a Stanley
hooked up to one of the zones, and it works just fine. Same
electrical characteristics as the "old" thermostats mentioned
above. According to the instructions with the Stanley (w/ 9V
battery), I "should" need an isolation relay IF I see the
above-mentioned voltage drop. To the best of my abilities, I
cannot see anything which looks lika transformer or relay
anywhere in the circuit!
So, what gives here? Why don't the new Robertshaws work?
Thanks for any insights!!
|
74.245 | There are some fundamental laws of physics | PRGMUM::FRIDAY | Patience averts the severe decree | Thu Dec 15 1988 10:49 | 33 |
| It usually saves money to set back the thermostat at night.
Although the characteristics of the heating system are important,
the primary consideration has to do with laws of physics. Here
the fact is that the greater the difference in temperature
between two bodies, the faster heat flows between them. In the
case of a house, the two bodies are the house and the outside air.
The greater the difference in temperature the faster heat flows
from the house to the outside. Lowering the temperature of the
house at night reduces the heat flow.
That the system has to work for an extended time in the morning
to bring the temperature back up is a distraction. If you were
to not set back the temperature you'd find that overall the
system worked longer to maintain the constant temperature.
With forced hot water there are two forces involved with respect
to the temperature of the water that circulates.
The hotter the water the more quickly your house will warm up.
In this case the two bodies are the circulating water and the
air in your home. On the other hand, the hotter the water
is in the circulator, the harder it is for the burner to
maintain the temperature of the water. In this case, the
two bodies are the oil burner flame and the water being
heated; here, what happens is that the heat that the water cannot
absorb literally goes up your chimney.
Our heating system attempts to maintain the temperature at 160
degrees for heating purposes. I set it back myself from something
like 200 degrees.
Rich
|
74.246 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Thu Dec 15 1988 11:52 | 15 |
| I don't remember my thermodynamics exactly, but heat loss is proportional to
either the third or fourth power of the temperature differential. That means
that if it's 20� out, and you keep the house at 60� overnight instead of 70�,
your heat loss will be cut to at least ((60-20)**3/(70-20)**3)=50%, and, if
it's the fourth power instead of the third, then the heat loss is only 40% at
the lower temperature. Of course things like air infiltration will alter this,
but the fact remains that the energy necessary to maintain a lower temperature
is much less. Also remember that your furnace won't run at all for several
hours while the house drops to to the lower temperature. In addition, most
furnaces run at their highest efficiencies when then run continuously, as they
do to heat the house in the morning. The only reason I wouldn't set the temp
way back at night is if the furnace were so undersized that it had trouble
heating the house up again in the morning.
Paul
|
74.247 | Heat Transfer equations | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Thu Dec 15 1988 12:50 | 36 |
|
Paul, I don't recall any of that third or fourth power stuff.
My Momentum, Heat and Mass transfer book gives the equation for
steady-state heat conduction in 1 direction
q = -kA dt/dx (Fourier's equation) = rate of heat conduction
in x direction
k = thermal conductivity of the wass at a given temperature
and pressure
A = cross-sectional area normal to heat flox
dt/dx = temperature gradient in x direction
A quick look at the thermal conductivity of a couple of common
insulators shows that the thermal conductivity does not very
significantly at the temperature differences a homeowner is
concerned with:
Insulator k at 100 deg. F K at 200 deg. F
--------- --------------- ---------------
laminated asbestous felt .045 .050
(20 lam/in)
rock wool .030 .034
diatomaceous earth brick .054 .056
I don't have a lot of figures available, but you get the idea.
The equation for radiation and convection is similar:
q = h A (t1 - t2), where h is the heat transfer coefficient.
|
74.248 | Don't let furnace idle on cold night | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Thu Dec 15 1988 15:50 | 6 |
| There's a problem with leaving the furnace off for a few hours
while the house cools to the night time temperature. If you have
heating pipes that run along outside walls, the water in those
pipes can freeze while the house temp. drops.
--David (speaking from experience)
|
74.249 | Thermo equations must be in degrees K, not F or C. | TALLIS::KOCH | Kevin Koch LTN1-2/B17 DTN226-6274 | Fri Dec 16 1988 09:48 | 13 |
| >I don't remember my thermodynamics exactly, but heat loss is proportional to
>either the third or fourth power of the temperature differential. That means
>that if it's 20� out, and you keep the house at 60� overnight instead of 70�,
>your heat loss will be cut to at least ((60-20)**3/(70-20)**3)=50%, and, if
>it's the fourth power instead of the third, then the heat loss is only 40% at
>the lower temperature. Of course things like air infiltration will alter this,
>but the fact remains that the energy necessary to maintain a lower temperature
>is much less.
The idea here is correct. This is true for one form of heat
transfer, but I forget which -- radiation or conduction. Also, the
temperatures must be figured in Kelvin, not Fahrenheit. That makes this
form of heat loss about 7% less for a 60F/70F spread.
|
74.250 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Fri Dec 16 1988 20:55 | 14 |
| re: .25
If all you're worried about is the difference in temperature, which
I think you are, I can't see why the units matter. K, C, or F, the
difference is the same. In the case of K and C, the difference
is exactly the same number; in the case of F, it's a different number
but the rest of the equation will then have "English" instead of
metric/ISO units to compensate; you'll come out with btu instead
of calories (or joules, or whatever the hell the ISO equivalent
of a btu is), but it should represent the same amount of heat loss.
Note: if all thermodynamics equations had to be in Klevin, no
engineering thermodynamics class would ever graduate! Engineers,
a contrary lot, work in Fareheit and btus all the time. Units
don't matter, as long as everything is consistent.
|
74.251 | How about a program? | CLIMB::LEIGH | Allen Leigh | Mon Dec 19 1988 07:46 | 23 |
| It seems that all of the previous replies agree that turning down the thermostat
at night will reduce the heat loss during the night. This savings is
reduced, of course, by the extra heat required in the morning to bring the
temp of the air (and walls and furniture, etc.) back up. Except for a general
comment in .21 that there is still a net savings, I didn't notice any other
comments about the extra heat required in the morning.
My wife is home during the day, and she has found that on cold mornings it takes
a couple of hours for the house to be warmed up and that during that time she
has a difficult time getting much done. Thus, my concern is getting an
estimate on the energy savings during the night and an estimate of the extra
energy required in the morning to restore the temp, so I can decide if the
discomfort experienced by my wife is worth the savings, i.e. how much would I
have to pay in energy costs to provide her a greater comfort level in the
morning.
Anyone willing to write a simple program that would allow the user to enter
room dimensions, amount of insulation, temperatures, etc., and then would
calculate the *net* heat savings/loss in reducing the thermostat at night?
Here is your chance, someone, for instant world-wide fame within the DEC
community :-)
Allen
|
74.252 | Auto-setback thermostats or insomnia... | LEVEL::REITH | | Mon Dec 19 1988 09:42 | 6 |
| If you have/get automatic setback thermostats you can have the heat
start back on a couple of hours before your wife gets up in the
morning. You'll still get some of the overnight savings and less (since
the house hasn't cooled as much) of the warmup costs. I get up an hour
before the rest of my family to go to work and as I leave I kick on the
downstairs heat so the edge is off the chill when they get up.
|
74.253 | Tough calculation! | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Mon Dec 19 1988 09:59 | 13 |
| RE: .27
> so I can decide if the discomfort experienced by my wife is
> worth the savings,
Allen! I hope you're not lowering the temperature too low.
I'd hate to be the one to show her the calculation on the
cost-benefit of her discomfort!
If it were my decision, I'd cut down somewhere else in the interest
of better marital relations. 8-)
Phil
|
74.254 | | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Mon Dec 19 1988 10:42 | 30 |
|
RE: all
OK, everybody, we have some people claiming they seem to know the
equation for heat loss. I've looked up what I could find in my
tranfer operations book by Bennet and Meyers, and put it in .23.
How 'bout some of you going back to your books, and finding them
instead of guessing in your heads. It sure would be nice to
discuss some known, documented equations, instead of your opinion
on what the equation might be. Let's act like engineers!
RE: .25
You are correct in saying that when dealing with only differences
in temperature, absolute temperature scales (such as Kelvin)
need not be use.
RE: .27
> It seems that all of the previous replies agree that turning down
> the thermostat at night will reduce the heat loss during the
> night. This savings is reduced, of course, by the extra heat
> required in the morning to bring the temp of the air (and walls
> and furniture, etc.) back up.
Simple???? We can't even agree on the correct equations for
simple conductive heat loss. You wanna guess how many other
things are involved when you apply it to a real situation?
|
74.255 | Is it worth it?? | HPSCAD::KNEWTON | This Space For Rent | Mon Dec 19 1988 11:08 | 12 |
| My husband spoke to the guy from our oil co. about putting in a
set-back thermostat. We have the old steam radiators. He said
we wouldn't save any money by using it with the steam radiators.
Is anyone currently using a set-back thermostat with the steam
radiators and oil heat? Have you saved money with it?
Could someone please explain why the oil guy told my husband this.
My husband tried to explain it but somehow it just didn't make any
sense.
Kathy
|
74.256 | Now , if I was in the oil business ... | NEBR::HARRISON | Knee High By The 4th of July | Mon Dec 19 1988 11:38 | 16 |
| re .31
Kathy,
Your oil guy told your husband this because your oil guy sells oil.
I have steam by oil and use a setback all the time. With similar
lifestyle between the year before I put the thermostat in and
the year when I put it in, I used approx 40% less oil.
Your mileage WILL vary ...
-Bob
|
74.257 | | CLIMB::LEIGH | Allen Leigh | Mon Dec 19 1988 11:50 | 18 |
| Re .29
> Allen! I hope you're not lowering the temperature too low.
> I'd hate to be the one to show her the calculation on the
> cost-benefit of her discomfort!
>
> If it were my decision, I'd cut down somewhere else in the interest
> of better marital relations. 8-)
Hi Phil,
Yes, I agree! I've been lowering the temp about 10-12 degrees and wasn't
aware until she made a recent comment about it taking 2-3 hours to get the
house warm after a cold night. I left the temp up during the cold spell we
just had, and it was much nicer.
Allen
|
74.67 | Robertshaw | IAMOK::DELUCO | Jim DeLuco, Corp VTX Prog | Mon Dec 19 1988 13:03 | 5 |
| On a recommendation, I just bought a Robertshaw, Model T1-1044 (I
think) and installed it this weekend. The best I've seen yet for the
price ($30. at Somerville Lumber). All solid state electronic, four
week day settings, four Saturday settings, four Sunday settings, four
over-ride settings, 2 AA battery backup, easy to use.
|
74.258 | Set-back thermostat and steam heat | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Mon Dec 19 1988 14:30 | 14 |
|
RE: .31
Kathy, I have oil/steam heat, and I use a set-back thermometer.
However, I do not let it get too cold in the house, because I
don't want my pipes to freeze, and I don't want it to take too
long to heat up in the morning. As for whether I'm saving money
by using it ... well, I really can't tell for sure. This is only
one of the many changes I've made to help save energy and make
my system more efficient, so it's really hard for me to tell.
--Th�r�se
|
74.259 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Mon Dec 19 1988 15:53 | 0 |
74.260 | Pipe freezing should not be a factor ... | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue Dec 20 1988 09:57 | 12 |
| re: several, wrt pipes freezing.
Having to keep your heat higher than you'd like because of pipes
freezings is indicative of another problem - get your pipe freezing
problem fixed!! Even if you never have a disaster, you are throwing
money down the drain running heat (or hot water) pipes through an
uninsulated area. Power or other failures can strike your heating
system, and burst pipes in walls can be a bigger mess than you've
ever dreamed of. Happened to a neighbor once who conceded that
he'd have been better off if the house burned down!
|
74.261 | Pipes can freeze even when insulated | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Tue Dec 20 1988 10:22 | 17 |
|
RE: 661.36 by BOSTON::SWIST
< Pipe freezing should not be a factor ... >
Jim, obviously it does not pay to run pipes through an uninsulated
area. However, even well insulated areas can freeze with no heat
source around. Insulation just slows it down. Especially in a
crawl space which is above the frost line. Especially when
temperatures go below zero (sometimes well below zero). Sure, if
I designed the house, I would not put a bathroom above a crawl
space, but it's there now, and I'm not a millionare.
As for a power failure/heating system break down ...
There is a simple way to prevent pipes from freezing -- drain
the system (or the areas which are most likely to freeze).
|
74.68 | Broken Honeywell | TUNER::FISHER | | Tue Dec 20 1988 10:29 | 9 |
| I have a honeywell set-back thermostat with a clock that is losing
time, the thermostat is about 4 years old and I was wonderering
if the maybe the clock wore out. Also, is it repairable. I also
have one of the sears digital thermostats which I would buy another
to replace the honeywell with if it cannot be fixed. thanks
Saul
|
74.69 | battery? | NSSG::ALFORD | another fine mess.... | Tue Dec 20 1988 13:51 | 7 |
| I'm no expert...but I suspect your battery is gone in the
Honeywell thermostat.. I think they are the nicad type, and
if I'm not mistaken they are 'hardwired' to the device...not
an easy chore to change! You may do better (read it may be
easier and cheaper) to just replace it!
|
74.70 | Call Honeywell and order a new nicad pack - easy | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Tue Dec 20 1988 18:16 | 13 |
| My setback thermostat is a Honeywell, too, and after several years, one
cell of the double-cell nicad inside it went, so the clock was not
always running (worked sometimes and not other times). You can get a
replacement nicad from Honeywell by calling the 800 number in the
booklet that came with the thermostat (they will try to give you a list
of local stores that might have the thing, but don't bother - I spent
two whole evenings visiting all the places they suggested and none of
them actually carry the nicad pack). It was real easy to replace. If
you don't mind kludging a bit, you probably could buy a pair of little
nicads from Radio Shack (or similar), tape them together, attach wires
to the ends, and put them in instead - I didn't bother with that, since
I wanted to be sure that the box would close over it neatly. Works
fine now!
|
74.71 | ITS BEEN DONE THIS WAY | USADEC::CHERNICK | | Wed Dec 21 1988 10:04 | 2 |
| THE way its done is to use a 24V set back thermometer and use a
220V relay. I am getting a quote one one now.
|
74.262 | It's not the heat, it's the hhumidity... | AMUSE::QUIMBY | | Wed Dec 21 1988 10:21 | 15 |
| Re: .35 (impact of setback thermal changes on house and furnishings)
It's hard for me to accept the idea that a shift of 10 degrees
causes significant additional stress to the things in your household.
Summertime temperature swings are greater (unless you constantly
run whole-house air conditioning).
But I believe the greatest source of stress on furniture and pianos
is caused by humidity cycling over the year -- humidity varies from
nearly 100% at times in the summer to something like 20-40% during
the winter, depending on the charcteristics of the house.
dq
|
74.263 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Dec 21 1988 14:23 | 21 |
| RE: << Note 661.38 by AMUSE::QUIMBY >>>
>
> But I believe the greatest source of stress on furniture and pianos
> is caused by humidity cycling ...
In the summer the humidity is almost always high enough that there
is no significant drying out of pianos and other furniture.
In the winter this is not so. The swing of 10 degrees or so in
temperature can cause a significant change in relative humidity.
Much more significant than similar and even large temperature
swings in the summer.
But your correct in any case; the best thing to do is to keep your
whole house heating/cooling system running year round. (O.K. If
you really want to you can cut it off for a few weeks each spring
and fall.)
My opinion remains that set back thermostats address a symptom and
not the real problem. In a properly sited, properly insulated home
they aren't worth the bother.
|
74.264 | It's nice to have the system automated | CALVA::WOLINSKI | uCoder sans Frontieres | Wed Dec 21 1988 15:03 | 12 |
|
I bought my set back thermostat for the convenience more
than energy savings. I like to sleep in a cold room and my
wife was always complaining the that the house was too cold
when she got up in the morning. So instead of me getting out
of bed at 5:30am to turn the heat the thermostat does it for
me. I have a very tight house so I'm probably saving zilch
but the convenience of having my heating/cooling system
automated was worth the cost.
-mike
|
74.265 | | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Thu Dec 22 1988 09:10 | 13 |
| re: affect on wood
It's the lack of humidity in centrally heated buildings that causes
musical instruments (and other wood things) problems. Temperature
swings are not relevant (except to tuning, as noted).
There are several documented cases of old organs from Bach's time
(ca 1700, whose mechanisms are all wood) working fine to the present
because they are in unheated churches in Northern Germany (climate
similar to New England). Similar/identical instruments in the same
climate have all but been destroyed in other churches who installed
central heat.
z
|
74.266 | My best heat cost saver. | ARGUS::RICHARD | | Thu Dec 22 1988 09:47 | 16 |
| After reading all these replies, I've finally got to put in my .02.
When we converted from oil to natural gas (It's a forced hot water
system), Fitchburg Gas, who did the conversion, gave us a "set back"
thermostat. We believe that it does save a little because the furnace
isn't running as often during the night; although it has to make
up for it in the morning. My house is well insulated and was always
cheap to heat. Our biggest savings however is by letting the sunlight
come through our big windows which are on the south side during
the day. We have a full view storm door that is also on the south
side. The entrance has a ceramic floor. When we open the door
to let the sunlight hit the tiles, they get very warm. Even on
very cold days, they warm up from a strong sun. Sometimes we even
have to run a ceiling fan to circulate all this free heat. Now
if I could save all this heat for at night.
|
74.267 | | POOL::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-02/Y05 -- dtn 381-2684 | Tue Dec 27 1988 09:10 | 8 |
| > <<< Note 661.41 by BOSTON::SWIST "Jim Swist BXO 224-1699" >>>
>
> There are several documented cases of old organs from Bach's time
> (ca 1700, whose mechanisms are all wood) working fine to the present
I suspect that "many" is more accurate than "several". I'm also
reasonably certain that this results from the type and quality of
wood used.
|
74.179 | PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT FOR ELECTRIC HEAT | NEXUS::R_IVERS | | Fri Dec 30 1988 15:46 | 16 |
| HELP!!!!!
I HAVE ELECTRIC BASEBOARD HEATERS IN MY HOME--THEY ARE CONTROLLED
BY THERMOSTATS IN EACH ROOM--SO EACH THERMOSTAT CONTROLS A SEPERATE
ROOM OR ZONE. I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO TURN THESE DIFFERENT ZONES
ON OR OFF AT PRE PROGRAMMED TIMES VIA A PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTAT--
SO FAR I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO FIND ANYTHING ON THE MARKET THAT WILL
ALLOW ME TO DO THIS. I HAVE USED PROGRAMMABLE THERMOSTATS IN THE
PAST ON CENTRAL HEAT AND AIR SYSTEMS BUT THEY WERE CONTROLLED BY
A 12 VOLT SYSTEM--THESE BASE BOARDS ARE 220V AC. DOES ANYONE KNOW
OF SUCH A DEVICE OR AM I GOING TO HAVE TO BUILD BY OWN.
THANKS FOR ANY HELP!!!
RIVERS
|
74.180 | I tink you're out a luck | FREDW::MATTHES | half a bubble off plumb | Tue Jan 03 1989 08:52 | 5 |
| I think you're SOL. You are attempting to control a ditributed heating
system the same as a centralized one. I think they are too different
to do that.
[please don't shout all the time with uppercase - me ears are hurting]
|
74.181 | Also looking for 220 volt programmable thermostat. | MISFIT::DEEP | Sometimes squeaky wheels get replaced! | Tue Jan 03 1989 10:20 | 12 |
|
Let me rephrase .0's question, since I'm looking for the same type of
device...
Does anyone know of a manufacturer that sells programmable thermostats
for 220 volt systems?
Also, re: .1, I don't think the original request was for centralized control,
as much as for SOME control. Even if it meant buying a few of the devices,
one for each zone, it would be better than nothing.
Bob
|
74.182 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Tue Jan 03 1989 11:18 | 24 |
| Surely this question has come up before. There must be answers
elsewhere.
I know of two solutions, both hacks: First Alert markets a programmable
thermostat controller that operates by manipulating the control
on your existing thermostat. It comes in two flavors, one for
thermostats that are controlled by a lever, and another for thermostats
that are controlled by a knob. I don't know whether they can fit
all existing thermostats, so you might have to replace your existing
ones, as well.
X-10, the people who make all the nifty devices for remote control
of electrical equipment (lights, etc.) make a small heater that
you mount underneath your existing thermostat, and plug into a standard
X-10 appliance module. Using your existing X-10 timer or computer
controller, you turn the heater on and off as desired. The heater
fools your thermostat into thinking that the desired temperature
has been reached; really you're trading off the massive heat and
electric consumption of your baseboard heater for the small amount
of heat and consumption of the X-10 heater.
Or you can do what we're planning on doing: putting in oil heat.
Gary
|
74.183 | I think I can help | BAGELS::MONDOU | | Tue Jan 03 1989 11:21 | 9 |
| I believe I have a catalog at home that has the thermostats
you are looking for. I'll look tonight and contact you tomorrow.
Electric baseboard heat can be set up for two types of thermostats.
One arrangement is to use a standard thermostat to control a
relay supplying the 220 VAC. The other type uses a thermostat
that directly controls the line voltage,ie, no relay.
Do you know which type you have ? If you have a relay, then
any regular programmable thermostat should work.
|
74.184 | X-10 pointer | SAACT0::SAKOVICH_A | Keep RIGHT except to PASS! | Tue Jan 03 1989 16:41 | 9 |
| RE: .3
For more info on the X-10 controllers...
RSTS32::X-10
(�SELECT� or �KP-7� to add conference)
Aaron
|
74.170 | solution - bad product | CONFG5::WEIGL | | Tue Jan 03 1989 17:18 | 9 |
|
In case anyone's interested, the following was the problem:
The thermostats are bsically incompatible with the heating system. Not
just MY system, but nearly all systems in the Northeast. I took them
back to the store where I got them, and was told that they've gotten
ALL of them returned by customers. Same problems. No fix available.
The sad part is that they're STILL selling the things....
|
74.185 | it does exist... | NEXUS::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Wed Jan 04 1989 04:09 | 9 |
| Berko makes a whole house control system that will give program
ability to zone (electric) heat systems. It does this by using
the controls in the room and load shedding(disabling) the heater
during programed heat down periods. Check American electric on
west moreno they used to sell them. BTW-this system will probably
require a rework of your present heat wireing layout.
-j
|
74.186 | This May Help | BAGELS::MONDOU | | Wed Jan 04 1989 09:02 | 10 |
| The Cadet Manuf. Company makes several models of setback thermostats
for electric heating. I have their catalog at work. Send me mail
and I'll send you a copy of the page with model numbers and
descriptions. The catalog does not list prices.
Cadet Manufacturing Company
2500 W. Fourth Plain
P.O. Box 1675
Vancouver, Washington 98668
206-693-2505
|
74.171 | Which Thermostat, Which Store? | LDP::BURKHART | Diaper Repair Man | Wed Jan 04 1989 09:59 | 31 |
|
RE -.1 Which Thermostat are we talking about?
I bought what at the time seemed like a real good deal on a
RobertShaw at Channel, $19.99 on sale. I didn't catch the part
about certain applications until I got it home but gave it a try
anyways. But no go.
My symptoms seem a little different from what everyone else
described. I have a gas fired FHW system with a pilot ignition
and 2 24v Taco zone valves. These things say they draw .9 amps.
The thermostat says it will handle up to 1.0 amps. I'm not sure
what the rest of the heating plant's electronics draw. Well after
I got the thermostat hooked up (easy 2 wire connection) I turned
on the override and the zone valve clicked on the furnace fired up
and the pump started pumping, all OK for about 45 seconds. Then
the system shut down. I figured it couldn't have warmed up from
70 to 80 in 45 seconds. I let it sit for a while and about 5
minutes later the system came on again. But once again for only
45 seconds. This continued until I disconnected the RobertShaw
thermostat and put the old one back in.
I never got around to returning it figuring it was just a
problem with compatibility with my system. An figured I'd give it
to some friend or relative for a present. I just hope it's not as
you say a defective unit. I still have my receipt all but 2
months old.
Any thoughts?
...Dave Who_wants_a_warm_bathroom_in_the_morning
|
74.172 | Robert Shaw will fix if defective | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Wed Jan 04 1989 10:21 | 8 |
|
My Robert Shaw thermostat is guaranteed for 3 years, so if it's
defective you can get it fixed/replaced. In fact I may use it
myself, since I have found a minor bug in the thermostat, but
I'm going to wait until summer.
-tm
|
74.72 | Workaround for Robertshaw on zoned hydroponic system. | WOODRO::EARLY | Bob Early CSS/NSG | Tue Jan 17 1989 12:41 | 13 |
| Quick Comment:
I called Robertshaw regarding the T60-1042 Setback Thermostat. It
won't work on a Zoned Hydroponic system because the "zones" typically
use a single 24v transformer.
If the T60-1042 is used on its own dedicated 24v transformer; it
would then work ok.
I haven't worked out the details yet on "How To".
Bob
|
74.73 | One method of using two Robertshaw Thermostats.. | MAMIE::EARLY | Bob Early CSS/NSG | Tue Jan 24 1989 13:27 | 21 |
| re: .72
Ok, I called Robertshaw on their "tol free" support line, and this is
what I learned. NO, the T60-1042/1044 CANNOT be used on zoned
hydroponic systems. BECAUSE there is a prblem with putting TWO
electronic setbacks on the SAME power source.
Person A at Robertshaw said that if a separate 24VAC source is used
for each thermostat, then it is possble to use this type.
Person B (on a second call) told me that the switch (for the control
line) is rated at 1.5 amperes.
The TACO zone controllers require 0.9 amps (900 milliAMps) at 24VAC to
control the solenoid.
Based on this information, each 24v xformer would need to be 24VA
rating (output).
Bob
|
74.173 | Problems getting the heat to come on. | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Tue Apr 04 1989 14:14 | 37 |
| I've got a real baffling problem with my setback themometer and
gas heater.
We used to have the standard Honeywell thermostat running our 1974
circa gas heater. Everything was fine. Heating bill was high.
We replaced the thermostat with (in order) 2 Robert Shaws, 1 *noisey*
mechanical Honeywell and finally a Jameson set back thermostat. The
problem I am experiencing I perceived to be in the new thermostats,
but I am coming around to think differently. Here are the symptoms:
The set-back will work fine for a week to a month. No problems. Heat
comes on a designated heating windows etc. Then, out of the blue
one day, the heat will not come on when the thermostat tells the heater
to go to work.
I've found that I can go to the heater where there is an electrical switch
mounted in the wall (light switch type) that turns off the flow of
electricity to the heating unit. Everything looks normal....pilot is
lit, etc. I flip the switch up and down about three times (on and off)
and then on the fourth time, I leave it off for a couple seconds.
Then I flip it on and wait. After about 10 seconds I hear the whoosh
of increased gas flowing and igniting and everything is fine for the
rest of that programmed heat period.
Sometimes this problem occurs more frequently. For example, right now
I currently have to go through this every time the heat is supposed
to come on. I don't think it is the thermostat's fault, but I could
be wrong. In all honesty, I have no idea what the problem is except that
the power surge seems to solve it.
Any ideas?
Many thanks in advance.
/brett
|
74.174 | | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Tue Apr 04 1989 15:33 | 11 |
|
Re: .17
Brett, I tend to agree with you. I doubt it's the thermostats.
If you want to be sure, you could try putting your old one back.
It sounds like it might be the controler on your burner, but
that's only a guess. Next time it happens try pushing the reset
button on your burner and see what happens.
-tm
|
74.175 | | HAZEL::THOMAS | Rich Thomas | Tue Apr 04 1989 16:22 | 4 |
| Are you sure you have a 24VAC thermostat circuit. Many gas systems
use millivolt circuits that won't work well if at all with electronic
thermostats. Another way to check is to put a jumper wire across
the 2 thermostat wires. If the system comes on, it's the thermostat.
|
74.176 | Still not sure | DECWET::HELSEL | A thousand points of lightwt threads | Tue Apr 04 1989 17:56 | 24 |
| It has a transformer on the system that I assumed was 24 V.
The transformer is definately fed by a 120 circuit from
the breaker box. I will check to make sure that the transformer
is 24 V.
I had a standard thermostat on it until I bought the set back
type. It always worked fine with the normal type. If I put a
normal thermostat on, it will work fine. If I touch the wires
together (there are only two), I am fairly certain that it will
come on. (will check)
The only time the heat does not come on is at the beginning of the
programmed heat period. Once it come on at the beginning of the
period, it will always come on when the temperature drops down
to the bottom of the anomalie.
Again, sometimes it works for a month or more without a glitch.
I am really confused.
Why does flipping the switch that controls the electricity to
the unit make it come on???
/brett
|
74.177 | See Also SET BACK THERMOMETERS | AHIKER::EARLY | Bob Early CSS/NSG Dtn 264-6252 | Mon Jun 05 1989 13:13 | 50 |
| re:Note 1995.17 Relay for setback thermostat ?? 17 of 20
> We used to have the standard Honeywell thermostat running our 1974
> circa gas heater. Everything was fine. Heating bill was high.
Was this the "standard" mercury bulb type ?
> We replaced the thermostat with (in order) 2 Robert Shaws, 1 *noisey*
> mechanical Honeywell and finally a Jameson set back thermostat. The
> problem I am experiencing I perceived to be in the new thermostats,
> but I am coming around to think differently. Here are the symptoms:
One thermostat or two ?
If TWO setbacks are used, each one (Robert Shaws) needs to have
its own 24VAC Bell Transformer source supply.
(There'd another note on SETBACK Thermostats where i explained this
already.)
> The set-back will work fine for a week to a month. No problems. Heat
> comes on a designated heating windows etc. Then, out of the blue
> one day, the heat will not come on when the thermostat tells the heater
> to go to work.
I had a similar problem to this. Turned out to be the relay driving
the furnace motor was defective. Another time it was a defectve
FHW pump relay (contacts).
> I've found that I can go to the heater where there is an electrical switch
> mounted in the wall (light switch type) that turns off the flow of
> electricity to the heating unit. Everything looks normal....pilot is
> lit, etc. I flip the switch up and down about three times (on and off)
> and then on the fourth time, I leave it off for a couple seconds.
Then I flip it on and wait. After about 10 seconds I hear the whoosh
of increased gas flowing and igniting and everything is fine for the
rest of that programmed heat period.
Sometimes this problem occurs more frequently. For example, right now
I currently have to go through this every time the heat is supposed
to come on. I don't think it is the thermostat's fault, but I could
be wrong. In all honesty, I have no idea what the problem is except that
the power surge seems to solve it.
Any ideas?
Many thanks in advance.
/brett
|
74.189 | Programmable thermostat search | DEBUG::GALLO | No time for JIVE from 9 to 5! | Thu Aug 17 1989 01:07 | 23 |
| Just paging thru the latest copy of DAMARK catalog (Sept '89),
I found a programmable thermostat on page 33 by a company
called "Water Resources International, Inc."
This unit looks pretty nice, with automatic heat/ac switch-over,
and a feature called "Automatic Duty Cycler", shown in the
picture, but not explained.
Is anyone familiar with this company? If so, is the Auto Duty
Cycler something like a pulsed gas feature? The price is $29
with a suggested retail of $79.
Maybe if I can find out where this company is located, I can give
them a call with some questions.
We presently have a Hunter programmable thermostat, but it is 6
years old, and it can be "accidentally" programmed to a 3 digit
setting (as a result of "key bounce") such as 667 degrees, if
the 6 key "bounces". The furnace tries to reach 667 degrees! (scary)
Any other current/state-of-the-art models to consider???
Thanks for the help... Paul Gallo
|
74.190 | Robertshaw gets my vote... | HPSTEK::BELANGER | Help me Mr. Wizard!!!! | Thu Aug 17 1989 08:47 | 7 |
|
I like the Robertshaw brand, good quality, Spag's sells them for around
$50.-, there are different models (with/without AC capability). A
little involved to program (as bad as a VCR), but good brand (I've
had mine a few years, and no problems).
Fred
|
74.191 | Second | IAMOK::DELUCO | Jim DeLuco, Corp VTX Program | Thu Aug 17 1989 14:08 | 5 |
| I agree re Robertshaw. I picked up a 7-day programmable with separate
settings (4 per day) for weekdays, Saturdays and Sundays, plus three
over-ride settings for $29.00 at Somerville Lumber about a year ago.
It works great. There are other notes here that discuss programmable
thermostats. I suggest you do a dir/title="thermostat".
|
74.192 | Use Keyword Listing !!! | OASS::B_RAMSEY | only in a Jeep... | Thu Aug 17 1989 20:11 | 3 |
| Or better yet look at note 1111.54. This is the listing of all
notes with the keyword HEATING-THERMOSTATS. No waiting for a search
thru 33,500+ notes for a listing.
|
74.194 | Need HUNTER Thermostat Documentation | KYOA::YATES | | Tue Oct 10 1989 17:51 | 22 |
|
First off - Please forgive me if theres a place this should go that
I dont know about
I just bought a nice 60 year old center hall colonial.
It has a HUNTER programable thermastat. Ive been programming
computers for about 10 years and I cant figure out how to program
the thing.
Does anyone have a manual for a hunter programmable termastat?
( I know - When all else fails read the manual)
Could I get photo copy?
any help would be appriecieted
thanks
tom
|
74.195 | | TUNER::BURROUGHS | | Thu Oct 12 1989 18:43 | 9 |
| I have three hunter thermastats in my home. I have 4 zones but
these things get expensive. There are several models but the all
work about the same. The access door has the basic info to program
it...some of the other stuff maybe in the manual only.....BTW you
can pick up the Hunters at Builders Sq. in Nashua. I'll look for
my manual tonight when I get home. Assuming I find it I'll send
you a copy through inter-office mail.
|
74.193 | looking for best price close to home...... | SASE::SZABO | Hey Stymie, where ya goin'? | Fri Oct 20 1989 15:59 | 3 |
| Anybody recall seeing programmable thermostats at BJ's?
John
|
74.74 | Stanley setback thermostats? | SASE::SZABO | Hey Stymie, where ya goin'? | Mon Oct 23 1989 10:31 | 14 |
| Can anyone comment on Stanley setback programmables?
Caldor's has Stanley thermostats on sale this week at 50% off.
In the sale paper, two models were mentioned. One was just a simple
2 temp changes/day while the other had no description other than
"Deluxe" model. The first one is on sale for roughly $24, while
the deluxe is $34.
I'm curious about the deluxe. (I'd assume it has 4 temp changes/day
with independent 4 temp settings for the weekend. Yes, no, maybe?)
Thanks,
John
|
74.75 | stanley = real-time programming? | BUFFER::CHOW | | Mon Oct 23 1989 13:21 | 22 |
| re: .74
> Can anyone comment on Stanley setback programmables?
I bought a Stanley (can't recall the model #) a few years ago and
didn't like it for a number of reasons, the most significant being
the "real-time" programming requirement. If you can do it right
the first time, getting up at 4 a.m. to set the program and have
a warm house by 5 a.m., it's not so bad but when you screw it up
(as I did a few times) and have to do it several times before you
do it correctly, it can get old. Then there's having to adjust
your schedule to allow you to get home an hour earlier than usual
to program it again. Perhaps they've changed this feature by now
but if they haven't, I'd recommend staying away.
I bought a Robertshaw (model t60-1042 I believe...for heating only..
no cooling) at Spags last week for around $35.00 and unlike the
Stanley, I can program an entire week's cycle at one time. So far
it seems to be working fine and if given the choice (especially with
the price being about equal), I'd go with the Robertshaw.
Milton
|
74.76 | Hate rainchecks! | SASE::SZABO | Hey Stymie, where ya goin'? | Mon Oct 23 1989 13:49 | 14 |
| Well, I went to the Methuen, MA Caldor at lunch only to find at
least 2 dozen of the cheaper thermostats (Model 300) and zip of
the deluxe (Model 600) type. I briefly scanned the Model 300 box
and saw what BUFFER::CHOW was talking about. It seemed to imply
the fact it had to be set at real time, but I find it hard to believe.
Heck, even the cheap timers people use to turn on/off living room
lights don't need to be set at real time!
I wonder though, if Caldor actually had any Model 600 thermostats
at all at the start of the sale (yesterday).......
Still very curious about that Model 600......
John
|
74.178 | | HANNAH::BOUCHER | Hugs are free and easy to give! | Tue Oct 24 1989 11:21 | 14 |
| If anyone is interested - Somerville Lumber has an Emmerson set back
for A/C and heat, with weekday and weekend programs on sale for $39.95
+ tax.
We originally had a Honeywell (cost us approx $60 4 years ago) which
gave out plus we lost some of the pegs. So, we've been looking around
for a new one, that didn't have pegs! The Emmersons that we found at
local True Values were from $97-$107.
When I saw the add for Somerville, I checked it out. We bought the
thermostat and installed it last night. It was really easy to install
and program.
joyce
|
74.77 | Honneywell Offers Line Current Set-Back Thermostat | ASPEN2::BOIKO | Is this Heaven..No, it's Iowa.. | Wed Nov 08 1989 12:22 | 19 |
| Well it's almost that time again - time for another heating season to
start. However this heating season I figured that a set back thermostat might
be just the thing my townhouse needs to cut those heating bills down just a
little. After reading through quite a few of the notes in this conference, they
all seemed to indicate that if (and I do) you had all-electric baseboard heat,
there are no set back thermostats which could run on line current.
This is NOT true. Honneywell makes a line current thermostat which
should work great for anyone out there with electric baseboard heat. The unit
came out about 1-1/2 years ago, and should do the trick. There are two models,
one for 2 wire homes and one for 4 wire homes. The model number (from memory)
is something like 948s-1017 (this is a 2 wire unit). Anyway all you have to do
is give an electricial supply company a call that sells Honneywell - and they
should be able to get it for you....
If your stuck will electric heat (Condo/Townhouse) this might be the
way to go.
-mike-
|
74.78 | Problem: Uses too many batteries (Robertshaw T60-1044) | AHIKER::EARLY | Bob Early CSS/NSG Dtn 264-6252 | Tue Jan 02 1990 12:21 | 28 |
| > re: 397.73 Set-back Thermostats 73 of 77
> the T60-1042/1044
Problem: Going through 9v "backup" Alkaline batteries about 1 per month
I called Robertshaw support line, and asked them about the Thermostat
"eating" backup batteries.
What they told me was that I could expect the batteries to last "about" 24
hours in normal service.
They then asked me whether or not the main power was ever turned off.
Well, in my area, we lose power "about" one to two hours per month, a few
minutes here and there. Their response was that if my power is that
unreliable, then in their opinion I should use a mechanical thermostat,
because the power is "off" too much.
I had a heck of a time trying to have them understand that 1- 2 hours per
month does not equal 24 hours per month, but to no avail.
In my estimation, it seems that the power supply (AC to DC conversion
circuit got fried), and it "runs" off battery power for the timekeeping
functions.
-Bob
|
74.79 | Does the boiler/furnace have an automatic shutoff? | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Tue Jan 02 1990 13:19 | 10 |
|
When my steam boiler runs low on water it shuts off the AC to
the burner and the thermostat. If you have any kind of automatic
shutoff device on your boiler that could be the problem. I assume
that your thermostat runs OK without the batteries when the power
is on, right?
-tm
|
74.80 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Jan 02 1990 14:27 | 10 |
| There are some kinds of furnaces/boilers that cut the power to the thermostat
when it is on. Often a hydronic system with zone valves will do this (though
the one I just had installed apparently doesn't). Also, I believe that
so-called millivolt systems won't supply enough power to run the thermostat
so that you use the batteries all the time.
Sears sells for about $14 a transformer-relay that can be used to provide
24VAC to the thermostat at all times, for such situations.
Steve
|
74.81 | | CTD024::TAVARES | Stay Low, Keep Moving | Tue Jan 02 1990 16:18 | 7 |
| I've had a similar problem with my thermostat, I can't offhand
remember the brand name. It turned out to be that the order in
which you install the battery and hook up the voltage from the
heater was critical, get it backwards and the stupid thing thinks
the battery is the heater and vice versa. The manual does not
give this warning, it only says to follow each step carefully.
Took several batteries to figure this one out.
|
74.82 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jan 03 1990 10:29 | 7 |
| I've been very happy with the Sears "Weekender" thermostat, which is actually
manufacturered by White-Rodgers. I had one in my old house and just installed
two in my new home. They've changed it a bit and lowered the regular price,
but it retains all the features of the earlier model. Very flexible and
reliable.
Steve
|
74.83 | weekender changed a bit. | CTD026::HOE | Sammy, Dad's home! | Wed Jan 03 1990 10:38 | 10 |
| Steve,
I was looking at the Sears thermostat. It now has a seperate
memory for cooling. You can program the thermostat for heating
and cooling so when the warm season comes, you just switch the
control to "cool".
It now runs on three AA batteries instead of the old 9 volt.
Cal
|
74.84 | Forgot how to set overshoot on Sears programmable. | TALLIS::KOCH | Kevin Koch LTN1-2/H09 DTN226-6274 | Wed Jan 03 1990 11:03 | 4 |
| I've misplaced the manual for my Sears thermostat, and forgotten how
to set the amount of time it keeps the burner running after the setpoint
has been reached. Can somebody tell me? It has something to do with
holding TIME-FWD and TIME-BACK at the same time, maybe?
|
74.85 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jan 03 1990 11:04 | 16 |
| Re: .83
Exactly. It used to be that you had to change the program when you switched
modes. I don't care for the change that moves the mode and fan controls from
slide switches to the membrane buttons, but that's not a big deal.
Another change which I wish hadn't been made is that in the new model, when
you use the up and down buttons to temporarily alter the temperature from
what the program says, it resets to the program setting after two hours.
In the earlier model, it would switch at the next program change. Of course,
in "hold" mode it keeps the temperature steady.
I like the programmable anticipator and the built-in compressor protection
circuit. It's just a nice, easy to use thermostat.
Steve
|
74.86 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jan 03 1990 11:08 | 12 |
| Re: .84
Yes, that's the one thing that's not obvious. You press and hold the
TIME FWD and TIME BACK buttons simultaneously. The anticipator setting will
be displayed, and as you hold the buttons, it will advance through the settings.
The defaults are HEAT 5 and COOL 11. They recommend a setting of HEAT 15
for FHW systems, which seems to work well. I haven't found it necessary
to change the settings on the FHA system. The higher the number, the longer
the system will run. I recall it also said that a cooling setting lower
than 10 is not recommended.
Steve
|
74.187 | Thermostat Catalog - 1 More Time | BAGELS::MONDOU | | Mon Mar 12 1990 09:22 | 9 |
| re .7
Someone recently contacted me by mail looking for some info
from the Cadet catalog I mentioned in the previous reply.
I could not locate the catalog at that time, but since have found
it. So, if that individual reads this and wants to try again, I
am holding the catalog for you.
Ernie Mondou
Mighty::Mondou
|
74.188 | a better solution | JUPITR::CHERNICK | | Tue Apr 17 1990 14:17 | 7 |
| Honeywell makes a programable line voltage setback thermostat. I used
one this winter and was very satisfied. Just got 2 more. I got them thru
McNally Supply in Worcester. They have to be ordered. 1-2 week
delivery. They cost about $70. I think the model no is 487. The one
I got was for a 4 wire installation. I installed it myself. It took
about 5 minutes to replace the old one. It's very attractive to boot!!
|
74.196 | Thermostat Battery?? | CNTROL::AMOS | | Mon Oct 22 1990 09:30 | 7 |
| I have a Minivector thermostat made by Chatham Brass Co. The problem is
the battery for the timer is drained. Where can I get a replacement
battery or get it recharged?? It is a Sanyo Cadnica N-100AA 1.2V 100ma
Help??
Dave
|
74.197 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Oct 22 1990 10:35 | 8 |
| Sounds like a standard AA Ni-Cad battery. Try Radio Shack.
I presume that the thermostat recharges the battery under normal
conditions (I once had a RobertShaw that did this). But after a
few years, the NiCad loses its ability to keep a charge and has to
be replaced.
Steve
|
74.198 | | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | Hemorrhoid from Hell | Mon Oct 22 1990 16:15 | 9 |
|
But I think you'd want to try and match up the current rating
as closely as possible to the 100mA that the batteries are
rated at.
Looking at the RS catalog, they only list 600mA batteries.
GTI
|
74.199 | | CSS::YEE | | Tue Oct 23 1990 00:05 | 12 |
| Check some of the local hardware stores, I have seen the replacement
Nicads for the Honeywell set back thermostats hanging in the same
racks. It seems that the batteries don't last much beyond 2-3 years.
The batteries for the Honeywell unit has wire leads that you can
splice in to the Honeywell (and Robert Shaw) units. I don't
remember the voltage rating.
1.2 VDC and 100 ma sounds like a AAA rechargeable. Typically the
AA's are 1.2 VDC and 500 ma.
Ed
|
74.200 | | CNTROL::AMOS | | Tue Oct 23 1990 08:42 | 7 |
| I tried Radio Shack - but no luck.
I also tried Sommerville Lumber to no avail - Someone told me to try
Newtonville Camera, so I will give that a bid.
Keep those suggestions rolling in.
Dave
|
74.201 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Oct 23 1990 11:32 | 6 |
| When you say "no luck", are you trying to find an identical (that is,
Sanyo brand and model number) battery? You won't find it. I would
use a standard AA Ni-cad cell, such as Radio Shack sells under their
own brand name.
Steve
|
74.202 | You do it electronics? | ROBOTS::BARKSDALE | | Wed Oct 24 1990 08:46 | 4 |
| If you are in the Newtonville area try You do it electronics, they are
usually high in $ but at least you will get what you need. Bring the
battery with you the people there will cross reference it for you.
|
74.203 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Oct 24 1990 10:37 | 3 |
| You-do-it is actually in Needham. According to their ad in the yellow pages,
they're off 128 ("take exit 19A, turn left at Gulf station"). (617) 449-1005.
No, I've never dealt with them.
|
74.204 | not di$count priced | STAR::SIMAKAUSKAS | | Wed Oct 24 1990 14:09 | 6 |
| You-do-it is in Needham at the Newton Falls(?) line. Very visable
from RT128 (1 exit south of Rt 9). Open 9 to 9 last time I was there.
And ss an earlier note stated, there's a good chance they'll have
the part you're looking for, but not at a discount price.
- John
|
74.205 | I finally ordered one from Honeywell | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Wed Oct 24 1990 14:47 | 13 |
| Not to put a stop to your search for the battery locally, but I never
did find one that fit my setback thermostat; I eventually ended up
calling up Honeywell and ordering it from them (it solders into the
thermostat; I didn't take the Honeywell shrink covering off to see what
kind of batteries are actually in it), after wasting several evenings
trying various central and eastern Mass. places. I did NOT think of
trying U-Do-It (which we usually call You-Blew-It because they often
don't have in stock stuff that they do have in their catalog, causing a
wild-goose chase). Honeywell mailed me one in less than a week. The
setback thermometer has been in place for about ten years, and that is
only the second battery pack, so they seem to last for quite a while.
/Charlotte
|
74.206 | staffed by clerks, not electronics people, far as i can tell | CLOSET::DUM::T_PARMENTER | Guns no one can see | Thu Oct 25 1990 09:48 | 5 |
| You-blew-it has lots and lots of stuff in stock, but I have never gotten any
advice, help, or customer assistance from them. The average Rat Shack
employee is more helpful. If you know exactly what you need, You-blew-it
*may* be able to supply it, but if you don't know exactly what you need,
neither do they.
|
74.87 | Set-Back for Heat Pump? | MVDS02::LOCKRIDGE | Artificial Insanity | Tue Nov 06 1990 13:12 | 10 |
| This seem to be the right place to ask this -
Does anyone know of a Set-back thermostat for a HEAT PUMP? Every
set-back thermostat I've seen says it cannot be used with a heat pump.
A friend of mine just bought a condo that has a heat pump with aux heat
and would like to put a set-back on it. Is one made?
Thanks!
-Bob
|
74.88 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Nov 06 1990 15:00 | 4 |
| Set-back thermostats are usually a bad idea for heat pumps, as large
swings in the set temperature can cause you to use the resistance element.
Steve
|
74.207 | SR Batteries | GENRAL::BALDRIDGE | It's downhill from here | Tue Nov 06 1990 17:34 | 7 |
| Those of us that are into radio control, cars, planes, helicopters etc
have come in contact with a company called SR Batteries, Box 287,
Bellport, NY 11713, phone 516-286-0079. They specialize in Ni-Cads of
all sorts. Give them a call and I'll bet they cal help you out.
Chuck
|
74.89 | | VMSDEV::HAMMOND | Charlie Hammond -- ZKO3-04/S23 -- dtn 381-2684 | Wed Nov 07 1990 12:43 | 18 |
| The following information is/was posted elswhere in this or some
other notes file. I copied it on 18-oct-1988, but edited out the
info on note number and conference.
A new setback thermostat made for heat pumps is now
available. Below is the info. They are expensive but
then again they may be worth the cost.
Digistat HP2000
American Stabilis Inc
P.O. Box 1289
Lewiston, ME
Starting up to 2 hours before setup time this thermostat
ramps the temperature up from the setback temperature in
0.5 degree increments This way it avoids turning on the
backup heating source.
|
74.90 | Thanks! | MVDS02::LOCKRIDGE | Artificial Insanity | Thu Nov 08 1990 11:55 | 3 |
| Thanks for the information!
-Bob
|
74.91 | Emerson thermostat/old steam system questions | KOALA::RYAN | I get mail, therefore I am | Fri Nov 30 1990 21:41 | 32 |
| We have an ancient steam boiler and old thermostat (no labels we
can find to identify the brand). We bought an Emerson EQT-170
1F70-353 setback (mechanical) thermostat. Our system was clearly
not on the main list of systems the thermostat could not be
used on (millivolt, heat pump, etc.). My father-in-law (a
carpenter) was going to install it, but when he checked the
voltage on the existing system he got 29 volts. So, first
set of questions - is a five-volt difference enough to worry
about? It was enough to stop him... Does this mean we have
some unique type of system, or a 24-volt system operating at
less-than-optimum?
Anyway, I took a look myself today. The instructions include this
note:
Your old thermostat may have terminals marked B[...] If B is used
(wire connected to it) this thermostat cannot be used. [...]
Exception: on Honeywell Series "10" thermostats, with R, B, and W
terminals only, combine R & B leads together and proceed as if
it were a single wire.
What I found included two terminals on the left with wires connected
to them, with labelling indicating they were for the clock. There
were also B and W terminals with wires connected, and a R label
near a couple of holes in the plate but no terminals. There was
also a fifth wire not connected to anything. So, my other set
of questions - assuming the voltage difference isn't a problem,
is this thermostat compatible with the system? Since there's no
"R" lead to combine with the B, can I just use the B? Or should
that unconnected wire be used?
Thanks, Mike
|
74.92 | | COOKIE::HOE | Dad, what's Christmas? | Sat Dec 01 1990 12:20 | 9 |
| Mike,
The 29 volts is open circuit voltage so 29 volts when loaded will
probably read in the range of 23-25 volts. Most of the set-back
thermostats have voltage regulators that ensures correct
operating voltages at the electronics. Mechanical devices are not
subject to the voltage sensitivity.
cal
|
74.93 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Originality = Undetected Plagiarism | Sat Dec 01 1990 23:12 | 73 |
| > What I found included two terminals on the left with wires connected
> to them, with labelling indicating they were for the clock. There
> were also B and W terminals with wires connected, and a R label
> near a couple of holes in the plate but no terminals. There was
> also a fifth wire not connected to anything. So, my other set
> of questions - assuming the voltage difference isn't a problem,
> is this thermostat compatible with the system? Since there's no
> "R" lead to combine with the B, can I just use the B? Or should
> that unconnected wire be used?
B is used on Heat pump systems for teh heating changeover valve
or on some conventional systems with a Damper control. What
the thermostat probably does with this is by the reverse use of
the anticipator, close the damper a short while after the
burner turns off. Joining R & B would close the flue damper
as soon as the thermostat stops requesting heat and teh burner
shuts off, not allowing any remaining gasses to go up the flue.
So, I cannot really see that this is a good idea, even if the
thermostat allows you to do it. Presumably, the current rating
to drive the burner relay and the damper control would be too
high, which is why most thermostats say not to use B.
So, presumably, on this existing thermostat, they are using B
in place of R, and my reaction would be to use R & W. Check
that your furnace does not have an electrically controlled flue
damper. If it does, then presumably R & B were effectively
joined at teh furnace and called B.
After a little under a year of using a set back thermostat made
for Canadian Tire, when I came to use it this year, I found that
when the stat called for heat, the furnace fan would come on and
not the burner, so I went back to my trusty manual round stat.
Ha Ha! The anticipator was up the creek on that and, even if
you turned the temperature requested up some 15 degrees, the
anticipator would turn the burner off before the furnace reached
the fan on limit setting of 130 degrees!
For the set back stat, this was the second one of the same model
installed. They use alkaline batteries, and the first one would
apply about10V ac to the batteries. Ever seen an alkaline battery
leak?
Anyway, I looked at a similar model, made by Hunter, to discover that
the innards were identical to the Canadian Tire model (these are all
relatively cheap compared to the top names). The neat thing about
these stats was that they actually monitored the heat on time, and
you could display the time the burner ran for today and yesterday.
It turns out that, particularly in the case of furnaces with
high voltage ignition (most oil) or electrostatic ignition, you
could get spikes induced on the thermostat lines which would
fry the uProc. Apparently to operate the heating safely, you need
another 24V transforrmer and an isolation relay.
So, after messing around with these cheapies, I spent some bigger
$ and bought a Honeywell CT4000A. It offers 4 programmable time
periods per day, labelled on the stat as Morning, Day, Evening and
Night (Easy for the wife to understand :-)). One program for
weekdays, one for Sat and one for Sun. And then the same thing
for cooling programs. This stat runs off 3 AA cells and has internal
relays buffering the stat from the furnace circuits. No more
fried uProcs for me!
It also offers deg F or C and 12 or 24 hr clocks.
A similar stat is the CT2400E which they claim can be used for heat
pumps without aux heat.
Stuart.
|
74.94 | Dead Weekender II | MOOV01::S_JOHNSON | that does not compute, Will Robinson | Mon Dec 03 1990 08:52 | 11 |
| I have a dead Sears Weekender II. It worked well for 4 seasons. Anybody
ever try troubleshooting one? Of course, you'd need a schematic. I'm wondering
if it's worth it, since I can buy a new one for $45-50.
Are these things meant to be disposable, and not repairable?
Would Sears charge me more than the cost of a new unit to repair it?
Steve
|
74.95 | Was considering one like that... | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Mon Dec 03 1990 14:39 | 6 |
| .93:
Is the Honeywell model you mentioned roughly squarish, something like
5 to 6 inches on a side, and very inobtrusive in appearance?
Dick
|
74.96 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Originality = Undetected Plagiarism | Mon Dec 03 1990 14:43 | 8 |
| It is still rectangular, but less so than say the Sears ones ... it
has rounded over ends and a swing out door which hinges on the left.
It's got a "softer" appearance than some.
You say "was considering" ... something make you change your mind
(apart from price ???) ?
Stuart
|
74.97 | The local decorator doesn't seem to have strong opinions here | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Mon Dec 03 1990 14:51 | 14 |
| It was indeed the price.
A Honeywell, of unremembered model, featuring 3 setbacks/day and
"decorator styling", costs $89.95 at Spag's (where else? ;-) --
a Robertshaw with 2 setbacks costs $44.95, if I remember the prices
correctly.
The amusing thing was that they carry the Robertshaw T-1044 (heating &
cooling) for $45, and the T-1042 (heating only), for the amazingly
lower price of $42! I suspect that the difference is that the heating-
only simply uses a single-throw controlling switch, and may omit a
couple of other components.
Dick
|
74.98 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Originality = Undetected Plagiarism | Tue Dec 04 1990 09:35 | 16 |
| Well, I didn't mind the price too much after running the cheapo's
back twice and there being very little on the market inbetween the
cheapies and the expensive ones. Not to mention the fact that while I
could have had others for aroudn $100, the additional transformer and
isolation relay would have set me back about an extra $40. Sears
Weekender up here was around $100 and the Weekender II was $149 ...
they wanted isolation relays too ... There are a few private
brands for around $75-100, needing an isolation relay, so the $139
Honeyuwell made somwe sense.
There was also the matter of my heating contractor putting a disclaimer
on faulty non-name brand thermostats which cause furnace problems.
Stuart
|
74.99 | Price spread seems somewhat less up there | LYCEUM::CURTIS | Dick "Aristotle" Curtis | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:34 | 6 |
| Had there not been some satisfied Robertshaw users commenting here,
I would have ponied up the additional bucks for the Honeywell. (And
if mine proves less satisfactory than theirs, I doubt that I'd want
to risk another go-round...)
Dick
|
74.100 | Weekender II question | ICS::COREY | | Mon Dec 17 1990 11:17 | 6 |
| I have a Sears Weekender II I just installed. It works fine except for
the fan control switch. It works fine in "AUTO" but the fan does not
come on when you switch it to "ON" (constant run). There were only two
wires for me to connect, red and white. Any ideas?
Thanks
|
74.101 | Two wires == No Fan Control | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Originality = Undetected Plagiarism | Mon Dec 17 1990 15:35 | 23 |
| With only two wires, the fan control switch on the thermostat cannot
possibly work.
I would imagine the only fan control on your furnace is provided by
the limit switch on the furnace (which will usually have a fan control
lever poking out of it, or some other way to get manual fan control).
To wire for full fan control, what you would need is a 24 V
transformer (or confirmation that the load on the burner control
transformer is low enough to give you manual fan control), a 24 V
fan control relay in a case. The fan control relay will be wired in
parallel with the limit switch, and the relay coil will be driven
Switched by the therrmostat. Note that the fan motor 110 V cannot be
switched directly by the thermaostat.
So, to put it simply, if you want remote fan control at the thermostat,
unless you know what you are doing, you would be well advised to call
in a heating contractor. Beware that incorrectly connecting wiring
to the fan limit switch (which also contains the furnace over-
temperature cut-out could accidentally disable a furnace safety
feature.
Stuart
|
74.102 | Missing stop pins in 'stat? | STAR::DZIEDZIC | | Tue Dec 18 1990 07:34 | 18 |
| If you only have two wires coming to your thermostat, you
probably have a heating-only system, as opposed to a combined
heating/cooling system. (Then again, perhaps you have a heat
pump of some flavor?)
Most of the Sears setback thermostats I've seen will work
with either a heating-only or a combined system. The 'stat
usually has two switches, one labeled AUTO/OFF/ON for the
fan control, and another to select the system (HEAT/COOL).
In the last Sears 'stat I installed on a heating-only system,
the instructions said to place little stop pins (supplied) in
certain holes of the backing plate which would block movement
of the fan switch into the "AUTO" position and the selection
switch into the "COOL" position.
As .-1 said, you need more than two wires to control the temp
and the fan.
|
74.103 | Thanks and anticipator question | ICS::COREY | | Tue Dec 18 1990 15:26 | 17 |
| Thanks for the replies. I only have two wires and heat only (FHA Gas).
I can live without the constant-run fan, the system and thermostat work
fine in the "HEAT" and "AUTO" settings. There was nothing in the
manual mentioning that the fan "ON" setting would not work on heat only
two wire systems, so I thought I'd ask about it here.
Another question though on the anticipator feature. It doesn't seem to
make a whole lot of difference what this is set to as far as how long
or short the furnace runs. The manual is real vague on this too. What
I'd like to do is set it so that the cycle -between- runs is a little
longer. Right now the thermostat is keeping the temperture dead-on,
but the short cycles between when the furnace goes off, and then back
on again is a little annoying. I could live with a 2� variation in
temperature if it meant a little longer time between on cycles.
Thanks
|
74.104 | | CLOSUS::HOE | Daddy, what's transision? | Tue Dec 18 1990 16:45 | 7 |
| Anticipator is the duration between the thermostat turn-off the
flame and when the fan stops. If the anticipator is set too
short, the furnace-fan will shut off and come on again. The
preset will work fine in the Weekender (as in the one that I
have).
calvin
|
74.105 | Anticipator not same as Swing or Hysteresis | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Originality = Undetected Plagiarism | Wed Dec 19 1990 11:18 | 42 |
| Almost, Cal ...
The anticipator in the thermostat allows the thermostat to turn off
the burner before the air has reached the actual requested temperature,
because there will still be some usable heat for distribution because
of the thermal mass of the furnace and the ducts.
If the anticipator is set for too much anticipation, the temperature
will not reach the requested temperature, and will thus tend to short
cycle. If the anticipator is set for too little anticipation you will
tend to overshoot the requested temperature and the burner will tend
to run for longer periods, and then off for longer periods.
The fan on/off controls are set by the fan limit switches on the
furnace itself (usually a small box near the top of the actual
furnace). What this switch will do is turn the fan on when the
temperature in the furnace reaches a pre-set temperature (usually
about 150 F) and turns it off when the temperature in the furnace
falls below the lower limit (usually around 120 F). These only
determine how long the fan is on. The temperatures above are what
are called the high range, and tend to waste a lot of heat up the
chimney, and put a lot into the basement.
Modern practice is to set the limit switches at about 120 for on, and
90 for off. THis extracts far more usable heat from the furnace,
although towars the end of a run the air from the registers may tend to
feel a little cool. The reason for not turning the fan on until about
120 is two fold ... one to avoidblowing too much cold air, and also
to ensure that the stack temperature increases quickly to ensure a
good draught and thus safe and efficient burner operation.
.-2
The setting that you are thinking you are adjusting when you talked
about the anticipator, is actually called swing or hysteresis. On
most thermostats this is not adjustable. This is the temperature
that you allow the temperature to fall before turning on the burner
and is generally about 1 to 2 degres F. Larger swings will tend to
make the burner run for longer periods, but can be uncomfortable.
Too small a swing will cause short cycling as well.
Stuart
|
74.106 | WEII in thermal runaway won't shut off | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Mon Sep 30 1991 22:06 | 23 |
| I'm having a problem with my Sears Weekender II.
The problem is when heat is called for the display on the thermostat
goes out and the heat stays on until I manually shut it off by
switching the switch to off. After a few seconds in the off position
I can turn it back on and the display returns showing the current temp
but the programmed temp is not displayed until I press either of the
temp up/down buttons.
The obvious problem/danger here is the fact that it keeps supplying
heat until the heater melts down, house burns down or I stop it.
(the first time this happened was in the middle of the night I woke up
chokeing it was so hot in the house 90 dgrees and climbing!)
I have replaced the BBU with no change in symptoms.
Per the owners manual it says if the display goes blank the unit is
loseing voltage from the limit? If so what is the limit and would the
problem be the limit or transformer for the furnace/limit?
The furnace is a signature 75,000btu FHA roughly 13 years old.
ADVthanksANCE, gort
|
74.107 | Sounds like... | XK120::SHURSKY | How's my noting? Call 1-800-BUM-NOTE! | Tue Oct 01 1991 09:03 | 4 |
| My electronics knowledge is limited but voltage loss usually implies bad
connections in my mind. Try cleaning all available connections.
Stan
|
74.108 | Take it back!! | WRKSYS::SCHWARTZ | | Tue Oct 01 1991 12:12 | 4 |
|
rep.106
Why worry about it?? Take it back to Sears. They will replace it
with a brandy new one that works.
|
74.109 | | GIAMEM::S_JOHNSON | | Tue Oct 01 1991 13:17 | 2 |
| Does sears have a lifetime warranty on their programmable thermostats, like
craftsmam tools?
|
74.110 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Oct 01 1991 14:16 | 19 |
| Re: .109
No, they don't. I believe the warranty is for one year.
The thermostat is clearly losing power. Some control systems don't
provide 24V to the thermostat while the furnace is running; for these, you
need a control relay. Sears sells these for about $15; they look like a
plug-in transformer, you run wires from the thermostat to the relay, and
another set to the control box. The relay does the switching and makes
sure the thermostat is fed 24V continuously.
I have this particular thermostat, and it has worked well for me for two
years. It does have the peculiar attribute that when it is calling for
heat, the "on" LED will cycle on and off, but this doesn't seem to affect
it otherwise. I do have zone valves, which can cause some thermostats
problems.
Steve
|
74.111 | Battery low | TROOA::DEBOER | | Tue Oct 01 1991 17:16 | 2 |
| Have you checked the batteries or tried a new set?
|
74.112 | Oh yeah the transformer reads 24.9vac | CSC32::GORTMAKER | Whatsa Gort? | Tue Oct 01 1991 17:58 | 20 |
| I haven't checked the connections yet but will try to do that asap.
The thermostat is well out of the warranty period I purchased it 7
years ago though I imagine that if I really wanted to push it they
would replace it. It has worked fine for the whole time it has been in
use up to the end of the last heating season.
Replacement of the battery diden't change anything(FWIW-the one I
replaced was 7 years old) I thought I might have drawn duds when I
bought the replacement but a 2nd new battery failed to effect a fix.
Other than the fact I have to manually turn the heat off the rest of
the system seems to function normal the burner cycles on/off, the
blower blows and the thermostat keeps proper time.
Somehow I'm inclined to believe the problem is not the thermostat
rather the thermostat is being effected by a failure elsewhere in the
system.
Thanks for the replies, -j
|
74.113 | Doesn't hurt to ask.. | WRKSYS::SCHWARTZ | | Wed Oct 02 1991 09:15 | 8 |
|
.109 is probably correct. I would take it to them and try. I
exchanged mine w/o a receipt and the new one has been working w/o
a failure for about 3 years now.
I just purchased two more of the to use in our addition. I think that
they keep the temp. very well regulated and I didn't want to have to
remember how to program more than one kind.:-)
|
74.208 | Auto set back thermostat CHEAP! | FSOA::BERICSON | MRO1-1/L87 DTN 297-3200 | Fri Dec 27 1991 12:26 | 19 |
| A colleague suggested that I post this... It Works!
Problem: Auto set back thermostats are expensive and I couldn't find
one that works on my 110 volt system.
I live alone in a large victorian house... empty from 7:00 am to 6:00
pm. I don't like to be cold. (I'm also cheap)
Solution: Put a night light under thermostat on an extension cord to a timer
Set it to go on at 8:00 am off at 5:00 pm on at 11:00 pm and off at
4:00am. Results: the house is warm when I am up and about and colder
otherwise (the thermostat thinks the house is warm when my 4v light is
on) the savings Tremendous! Heck even the lack of the frig going on as
often pays for this quickly..
This is a money saver... not to mention the environ.
Bob
|
74.209 | | FSDB45::FEINSMITH | Politically Incorrect And Proud Of It | Fri Dec 27 1991 13:18 | 5 |
| Actually, this is the way that the early Heathkit programmable
(mechanical) setback worked. It had a small bulb in the thermostat
housing that "fooled" the unit.
Eric
|
74.210 | The gov't uses that trick too! | SPNDZY::HICKS | Congress - a hole in the moral ozone | Fri Dec 27 1991 14:41 | 3 |
| That's the trick we used in government buildings after good old Jimmy
Carter had all the thermostats locked at 78 degrees in the summer.
Kept the offices nice and cool!
|
74.211 | | KAHALA::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Fri Dec 27 1991 15:20 | 4 |
| How would it work in the summer? I can see in the winter, the heat just wouldn't
come on and the outside cold would cool the house. But in the summer?
Ed..
|
74.212 | It would make the heat stay off longer too 8^) | ZENDIA::REITH | Jim Reith DTN 226-6102 - LTN2-1/F02 | Fri Dec 27 1991 15:55 | 2 |
| it would make the AC stay on longer by warming the thermostat above the
ambient temperature
|
74.213 | | HPSRAD::RIEU | Read his Lips...Know new taxes | Mon Dec 30 1991 12:08 | 5 |
| re:.0
What's so expensive about a set-back thermostat? I got mine at Sears
for $50-$60. I don't think that's too bad. It even has a different
program for weekends.
Denny
|
74.114 | Sears Weekender: Instructions wanted. | SOLVIT::FRASER | Rollover: 1000 Points When Lit! | Wed Jan 29 1992 16:10 | 16 |
| Hi - I have inherited a couple of Sears Weekenders with the
heating system in the house we bought, but the seller left no
manuals for anything. The Weekenders are the type where you
hold the Time Forward and Time Back pads to change anticipator
settings (can't remember which model this is) and they have the
rectangular quartz digital display with the heat up/down
buttons on the right side of the display and the fold down
panel concealing the controls.
Question - would anyone please care to photocopy/let me borrow
the manual/instructions for the thermostats?
Thanks in advance!
Andy Fraser
MKO1-2/D04
|
74.115 | | 6602::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 29 1992 16:49 | 2 |
| Andy if you can't get them here, call Sears. They'd probably be
willing to send you a copy.
|
74.116 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Jan 30 1992 13:29 | 3 |
| I've got two, I'll send Andy one.
Steve
|
74.117 | | VLAB::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Jan 30 1992 15:00 | 3 |
| Sears will 'sell' you a copy. Haven't yet had them offer to give me
one free of charge for anything.
Denny
|
74.118 | Appreciation! | SOLVIT::FRASER | Rollover: 1000 Points When Lit! | Fri Jan 31 1992 16:35 | 7 |
| Thanks for the replies folks, including the very helpfull Email
from Chris.
Steve - that's very kind of you - much appreciated!
Andy
|
74.119 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sat Feb 01 1992 13:50 | 4 |
| For future reference, the Sears part number for the Weekender
thermostat owners manual is 37-4477A.
Steve
|
74.120 | Novice questions. | VAXWRK::SWARD | Common sense is not that common | Tue Dec 01 1992 16:44 | 21 |
|
I have read the whole string of replies here but still have a few
questions about these foreign heating devices... (I'm Swedish)
I just moved (I'm renting) into a place that has a Gas furnace and
radiators that is heated by steam. They make sounds...
Anyway, the place has one of these little round thermostats on the wall
(one) and I would like to replace it with a gismo (I like those!)
preferable the fancy programmable one. Now, what do I have to do to
minimize my trips to the HW store? I know I have two wires going into
the gas furnace but that's all I know. It seems to me that the ones
that fits on the existing thermostat is the easiest to install but
there was almost no mentioning of those in this string. Do they come
with the 4/day/weekend programming?
Another question is, how do you get the old one off the wall? I didn't
see any obvious screws?
Peter
|
74.121 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Dec 01 1992 20:56 | 7 |
| Pry off the surrounding bezel ring; the screws will be underneath.
Almost any of the setback thermostats will work. Be sure to read all
the instructions before disconnecting any wires! Remove one at a
time, note which terminal it went to on the old thermostat and mark
it with a piece of tape.
Steve
|
74.122 | check ignition | SMURF::WALTERS | | Wed Dec 02 1992 08:48 | 10 |
|
The other thing you might need is a small spirit level to level
up the replacement thermostat. Check the furnace to see what type
of ignition it has. Some of the setback thermometers are not
recommended for spark-ignition - the Robertshaw model for example.
Regards,
Colin
|
74.123 | very easy, instructions in replacement thermostat | TUXEDO::MOLSON | | Wed Dec 02 1992 12:03 | 12 |
| Once upon a time, I was also renting an apartment with one of those
round thermostats and paying way too much for heat. I went to the
hardware store, with the brand of the thermostat and the furnace. One
of the salespeople showed me what there was to pick from, given the
thermostat I was replacing.
THe instructions in the setback thermostat included every detail of how
to get the old one off, and keep track of the wires (after shutting off
the fuse). It also told you really really basic things like how to tell
that you shut off the right breaker. This was an extremely easy
project.
|
74.124 | | KAOFS::S_BROOK | | Thu Dec 03 1992 14:47 | 12 |
| re Spark Ignition ...
Yes, this has the habit of doing in electronic programmable stats.
I have a Honeywell programmable stat that will work with spark
ignition. It has small isolation relays that actually do the
controlling.
I blew up 2 regular programmable stats until I discovered the problem.
The spark ignition transmits too many "spikes" on the 24V tyhermostat
wires than the electronics in the stat can handle.
Stuart
|
74.125 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Dec 03 1992 19:48 | 6 |
| Sears sells an inexpensive ($15) transformer/relay which can be
used to control troublesome furnaces from programmable thermostats.
The transformer supplies 24V to the thermostat and switches the
relay as the thermostat wants.
Steve
|
74.214 | ? A thermo-stat that will phone me ? | DKAS::HOPKINS | | Sat Jan 08 1994 20:58 | 7 |
| Hi!
Has anyone heard where I can purchase an intelligent thermo-stat
which will generate a phone-call to me if the house goes below
50 degress ?
Thanks
Pete
|
74.215 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Sat Jan 08 1994 21:23 | 6 |
| I've heard of such a thing - not a thermostat, but a separate device
that will call preset numbers under certain conditions, one of them
being low temperature, and play a recorded message. I haven't seen
it advertised in a while, though. Not much help, I realize...
Steve
|
74.216 | Security Systems | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Mon Jan 10 1994 09:18 | 5 |
|
There are home security systems that will contact you for various
reasons including water in the basement and temperature drop.
- mac
|
74.217 | at one time | DAVE::MITTON | Token rings happen | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:28 | 7 |
| Radio Shack had such a device for a while, then discontinued it.
It could autodial under pre-programmed temp conditions (high,low)
and give you a voice synth. message.
Another vendor may have picked up the design.
Dave.
|
74.218 | Easy solution | JVAX::JOHNSON | | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:46 | 4 |
| All you need is an autodialer and a thermostat.
If you want to alarm for high temperatures, use a thermostat
for heating and cooling. That provides a contact closure on temperature rise
as well (you need two thermostats for to get both).
|
74.219 | Northern Hydraulics for Mailorder | AKOCOA::SELIG | | Mon Jan 10 1994 16:22 | 6 |
| Northern Hydrualics, a mail order catalogue company has both autodial
freeze sensors......I believe they were in the $50 range. If I can
remember, I'll bring their catalogue in tomorrow to post the part
number and NH's 800-number.
Jonathan
|
74.220 | I have one! | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Mon Jan 10 1994 16:33 | 13 |
|
I HAVE that unit from Radio Shack. It is perfect for keeping track of
a vacation house when you aren't there. It will call you (and up to
three MORE people) if the temp goes too high, too low, if the power
goes out, or if there is a break in (If you connect it to door switches
or such). All of the parameters are easily set and you can even call it
up and IT will answer the phone after some number of rings (Also
setable) and TELL you the current conditions.
It works great. Its made by DuoPhone and I have seen THOSE
units for sale in other places. Its too bad Radio Shack stop selling
these units. It was the best $100 dollars I ever spent.
Kenny
|
74.221 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Jan 10 1994 20:39 | 4 |
| DuoPhone is Radio Shack's brand name for its telephone products.
The unit was made for Tandy by someone else.
Steve
|
74.222 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Tue Jan 11 1994 11:46 | 6 |
|
Ah, sorry! The correct name is NUtone. They are the folks who have been
making house electric/electronic stuff forever. Lighting stores carry
their stuff.
Kenny
|
74.223 | Try Global | KELVIN::MCKINLEY | | Wed Feb 23 1994 09:58 | 6 |
| I saw a product to do this in the new catalog from Global Computer
Supply. I don't have the catalog here, but it's usually not too hard
to track down one of them. The device was expensive, $280, but did all
that you want and more.
---Phil
|
74.126 | Programmablke Thermostats-Comparative Info.?? | POWDML::SELIG | | Mon Dec 12 1994 09:31 | 18 |
| Has anybody done research evaluating the current models of programmable
thermostats. I was at Home Depot yesterday and saw:
Honeywell - $54 - $83
Robert Shaw - $32 - $54
Hunter $23 - $54
I'm basically looking for something compatible with a two wire FHW
gas fired heating system, to replace the round manual Honeywell 'stats
that are >20 years old. The primary finctionality I need is:
- 4 or more set back during weekdays
- 2 or more setbacks weekends
- vacation overide
Any input on acuracy, reliability, price value would be appreciated.
JBS
|
74.127 | Some input | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Gotta love log homes | Mon Dec 12 1994 10:49 | 12 |
| I don't have any of these (we have a cheapo no-name brand).
My brother bought a Hunter this summer for his gas FHA and AC system. It was
less expensive than the others ($27?) and he has not had any problems with it.
My mom has a Robertshaw, I think the 1000 model, around $30 at Spag's. She has
it on an old FHA system, has had it a year, and has not had any problems at
all with it.
Hope this helps.
Elaine
|
74.128 | Robertshaw is OK. | SMURF::WALTERS | | Mon Dec 12 1994 11:00 | 10 |
|
I've had the basic $35 Robertshaw for about 5 years now with no
problems. It has all the features you mention and performs fine.
Batteries last about 18 mos.
One thing to watch out for is that not all of these are compatible
with spark-ignition systems and only work with pilot-light ignitions.
Colin
|
74.129 | static | NOVA::MICHON | | Mon Dec 12 1994 11:16 | 6 |
| We went through 2 hunters in our place before I put
back the regular thermostat. During the winter
there would be so much static electricty from walking on the
rug that touch the hunter cuased some major static discharges
when I touched it. I actually blew out 2 units from the
shocks. Pretty cool if it wasnt such a pain.
|
74.130 | | NOVA::SWONGER | Oracle Rdb SQE | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:16 | 4 |
| FYI, Consumer Reports rated thermostats at some point during the
past year. Probably worth a trip to the library to check it out.
Roy
|
74.131 | Hunter Set-n-Save II's are ok | SOLVIT::COLLINS | | Mon Dec 12 1994 13:32 | 25 |
| We have Hunter Seat-n-Save II thermostats. We installed them 2 years
ago and think they do save money over the manual Honeywell thermostats.
I haven't had a battery die yet so batteries last atleast 24 months.
My one gripe about the Hunter is that it will maintain the set point
temperature only to within 3 degrees. This is a fairly wide
temperature variation. For example, if you set the temp to 66, it'll go
to 63 before cycling the furnace and warm the room to 69 before
shutting off. The higher end Hunters are accurate to 1 degree. Of
course they cost motre and have more features but I didn't want to
spend that much on thermostats.(we have 4 zones)
The 1995 Consumers Reports annual buying guide has a short listing
of setback thermostats. I think the full listing and report is in some
94 issue. I believe a Robertshaw($90) was rated #1. Our Hunters cost
about $35 this time of the year. You'll be paying for the number of
setbacks and the temperature accuracy. The programming is very simple
and I like having the time displayed on the thermostat. There is an
"up" and "Down" button for manually increasing or decreasing the temp.
and the "new" temp only lasts till theend of thecurrent programming
cycyle. If I raise the temp to 70 at say 8PM, it'll automatically go back
to it's setback temp at the end of the current cycle. For us, that would
be 63 at 11:30PM. I think most setback thermostats have this feature.
|
74.132 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Mon Dec 12 1994 20:36 | 14 |
|
We have the Robert Shaw's, but my situation is a bit different than
most in here. I live in Arizona, and get a special rate to not use
electricity from 9am to 9pm. What I try to do is cool my house to
about 68 by 9am, and my AC won't go on until 2 or 3 pm, when it's set
to 82.
The thermostats were about $65 each. I have two heat pumps, so they
were a bit more, and I figure I saved myself just on the cost of
foregetting to reset the thermostats once before going to work. They
did seem to save about 30-40 a month in the summer, just by being able
to pre-cool.
Bruce
|
74.133 | sounds like heaven | SMURF::WALTERS | | Tue Dec 13 1994 09:47 | 7 |
|
> about 68 by 9am, and my AC won't go on until 2 or 3 pm, when it's set
> to 82.
Do I really want to hear this on a freezing new England Morning? :-)
|
74.134 | Looking for a free round manual Honeywell. | HDLITE::NEWMAN | Chuck Newman, 508/467-5499 (DTN 297), MRO1-2/K5 | Thu Dec 15 1994 00:15 | 9 |
| � I'm basically looking for something compatible with a two wire FHW
� gas fired heating system, to replace the round manual Honeywell 'stats
� that are >20 years old. The primary finctionality I need is:
Let me know if you're planning on pitching your old round manual Honeywell. I'd
like to replace the manual control on my wood furnace (but not so much that I'd
be willing to spend any money on it.
-- Chuck Newman
|
74.135 | | SCHOOL::BENZ | I'm an idiot, and I vote | Thu Dec 15 1994 13:56 | 13 |
| I also installed Hunter Set-n-Save II thermostats, and we also see the
wide temp variation. And I would prefer to have 4 set points for
weekends, at least for the bedroom. But, they do the job.
General gripe - on both this and an electronic timer for our porch
light, I feel that the versions we had in our old condo were better -
those older generation units had slightly better user interfaces, and
the subtle differences are annoying.
You probably ought to consider each zone separately - I've got 5 zones,
and only installed them on 2.
\chuck
|
74.136 | | NODEX::PINCK::GREEN | Long Live the Duck!!! | Fri Dec 16 1994 18:18 | 10 |
|
We have had a Hunter set and save?? for 2 years also. Ours
goes on when it is 1 degree low and off when it is 2 degrees
high...
Set at 68, on at 67, off at 70.
My Father's works the same way.
Amy
|
74.137 | Hunter works fine | SNAX::SMITH | I FEEL THE NEED | Mon Dec 19 1994 08:09 | 4 |
| I have the Hunter set and save II. Heating system is forced hot water
fired by gas. Simple 2 wire hookup. Works just fine. I notice about a
1 degree low/2 degree high difference from the set point. Don't
consider it a problem. Thermostat placement has alot to do with it.
|
74.138 | HoneyWell Magic Stat is their 1st Choice | VSSTEG::CHENG | | Mon Dec 19 1994 09:02 | 6 |
| According to Consumer Report, the HoneyWell is more accurate. It has a
temp swing of 1 degree. The Hunter has a temp swing of up to 5 degree.
All others has temp swing of 2 to 4 degree. The HoneyWell Magic Stat
was their No.1 choice. I bought one at Home Depot yesterday for $58 and
installed it in less than 10 minute. Setting it up is quick easy. I
wish it has 4 programs instead of 2 for the weekend.
|
74.139 | static => get a humidifier | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, UC1 | Wed Dec 21 1994 00:37 | 13 |
| > We went through 2 hunters in our place before I put
> back the regular thermostat. During the winter
> there would be so much static electricty from walking on the
> rug that touch the hunter cuased some major static discharges
> when I touched it. I actually blew out 2 units from the
> shocks. Pretty cool if it wasnt such a pain.
Hmm, interesting. When I first got my hunter set&save II
i never blew the unit, but the static electricity did
cause the unit to reset (and hence forget all my programming).
After I started using a humidifier in the winter time however
I haven't had a problem since (and the more humid air makes
it feel warmer than dry winter air).
|
74.140 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, UC1 | Wed Dec 21 1994 00:48 | 23 |
| > My one gripe about the Hunter is that it will maintain the set point
> temperature only to within 3 degrees. This is a fairly wide
> temperature variation. For example, if you set the temp to 66, it'll go
> to 63 before cycling the furnace and warm the room to 69 before
> shutting off.
Wow, that's a 6 degree range! Like the previous noters, I
have a Hunter Set & Save II that has a range of 2.0 degrees.
Ie. if set for 66, it will kick on when it reads 65, and off
when it reads 68.
That may sound like a 3 degree range, but remember that when
the room is cooling down and the unit first reads 65, the actual
temp is probably more like 65.9. And the same when heating and
it reaches 68, the temp is probably like 68.0 (of course however
even after the heat turns off, it warms up slightly more as
the rest of the heat radiates from pipes/fins).
What I really like about the Set & Save II is the usage monitor.
It keeps track of the "on time" for the current day, previous day,
and since it was last cleared. Tuesday for example I know that
the themostat called for heat 3 hours and 41 minutes in that 24 hour
period.
|
74.141 | the variation may be settable inside | WRKSYS::RICHARDSON | | Wed Dec 21 1994 10:03 | 21 |
| My setback thermostat had such a wide temperature range that it made
things pretty umcomfortable - I would believe that it had a 6 degree
variation. We found ourselves putting on and taking off sweaters as
the thing cycled the furnace. I guess this was some designer's idea of
how to make the furnace run more efficiently - it is gas-fired forced
hot air anyhow. We took the thermostat apart and found that it had an
uncalibrated control for the temperture range before it cycled the
furnace on or off. We tweaked that a couple of times and life became a
good deal more comfortable. I have a very old, very simple setback
thermostat, made by Honeywell. It has NiCad batteries to keep its
clock running (we've had to replace the battery, which is an oddball
one available only from Honeywell but not expensive, twice over the
yars), and little pegs you plug into pins on the clock face to control
whether the furnace is in warm mode or no-one's-awake-anyhow mode.
There is an override button on the bottom you can push to switch the
current mode. I leave it set for 60 degrees at night and 68-70 degrees
when it is in "warm" mode, which is from 7-8:30 in the morning and from
5:30-10:30 at night. The furnace very seldom comes on at all when the
night time setting is in use - the house is very heavily insulated.
/Charlotte
|
74.142 | Programable thermo's for heat pumps..?? | TEAM01::TURCOTTE | Oh King eh? very nice... | Wed Jun 14 1995 14:50 | 23 |
|
Went to Builders Square today looking for a programable thermo for
my house, I have FHA, with a heat pump. The Square only had
Honeywell "Magic-Stat" type programable thermo's, and *none* were
compatiable with heat pumps.
I went to HQ, they have Hunter "Set-n-Save" type, only one model was
compatable with heat pumps (the $98 unit) but they have not had them
in stock for over 7 months.
Basically I've got two questions:
What is the big deal with using a programable (set back) thermo
with a heat pump?
Why are they so hard to find?
And why....Okay 3 questions, I have 3 questions...
And why are they so expensive...?
Steve T.
|
74.143 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jun 14 1995 15:53 | 10 |
| Heat pumps have more control signals. Also, with heat pumps, the best setback
approach is to increase the setpoint slowly, rather than jump as a normal
setback thermostat will do. Otherwise the heat pump will decide that you
need the resistive heating element on which will cause you to use MORE
energy than you would have without the setback at all!
I've often seen it suggested that setback thermostats are rarely a win for
heat pumps due to their slow temperature recovery.
Steve
|
74.144 | | NETCAD::FERGUSON | | Fri Jun 16 1995 13:45 | 3 |
| You'll probably find lots more choices in September.
These are considered a "seasonal" item - at least
that's what I was told at Home Depot.
|
74.145 | Thanks...some other questions tho'... | TEAM01::TURCOTTE | Oh King eh? very nice... | Fri Jun 16 1995 14:47 | 26 |
|
>>I've often seen it suggested that setback thermostats are rarely a win for
>>heat pumps due to their slow temperature recovery.
I guess that this suggests thats its better, in a heat pump application,
to maintain a constant temp, rather than allow the temps to rise
during the day when no one is home, and cool the house prior to
someone actually being home?
I've noticed on weekends that the A/C will cycle on and off to maintain
the requested temp quite frequently, and I don't really want that to
happen all day while no one is home. Since there are some programmable
thermo's that allow use with heat pumps, I assume that the problem of
gradually changing the temp (increase/decrease) has been addressed by
the maker?
On my current system, the only way I can make the resistive element
kick in is to move the selector to the "aux heat" position, which kicks
in the resistive element, am I correct to assume there is no method of
auxiliery cooling? In other words no resistive or auxilery element for
cooling?
The need for more advanced controls explains the added expense to the
heat pump approved units, but not the lack of availability.
Steve T.
|
74.146 | What I'd do | CADSYS::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie, 225-4199 | Fri Jun 16 1995 15:38 | 5 |
| You may have better luck if you go to any electrical supply house, rather than a
homeowners lumber house like BS, HQ or HD. You may also get higher quality and
more knowledgeable salespeople.
Elaine
|
74.147 | | NOVA::FISHER | now |a|n|a|l|o|g| | Fri Jun 16 1995 16:14 | 3 |
| and perhaps even better prices!
ed
|
74.148 | but the questions remain.... | TEAM01::TURCOTTE | Oh King eh? very nice... | Mon Jun 19 1995 16:47 | 19 |
|
Thanks, I have looked at electrical supply houses, and prices are not
substanially better, but the units are avialable.
I'm still trying to decide if this the way to go, in a heat pump
application, any Heat Pump users out there with "set back/programable"
thermostats?
I'm still unclear how this type of thermostat will affect the air-
conditioning. I don't believe there is a seperate "resistive" element
for cooling, so programable thermo's should not be a problem with
the A/C, only during heating, correct? And if the thermo is designed
with the heat pump in mind, then it will raise the temp more
gradually, correct?
Right now I'm leaning towards getting one, but would like to hear some
opionions prior...Thanks again
Steve T.
|
74.149 | Are batteries a pain in the ... | SHARE::TSS | | Tue Sep 05 1995 12:12 | 20 |
|
Hi,
I did a dir of this topic and read lot's (not all) of the replys.
Like a lot of the replies I'm replacing an older round honeywell
mecury switch thermo. with a digital programmable unit.
The one issue that I'm wrestling with is the batteries.
- What happens when they die (If for some reason I
don't have a replacement handy, - do I pull the
thing off the wall in order to switch my heat on?)
- How often are people finding they need to be
replaced (the batteries).
Thanks.
|
74.150 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Sep 05 1995 12:47 | 8 |
| The unit I have (The White-Rodgers sold as Sears "Weekender") has a fail-safe
mode where it will revert to a preset program if the batteries fail. The
manual controls work regardless - the primary power comes from the furnace,
not the batteries (which serve as a backup of the program and clock in case
of power failure.) I would expect most other units to be similar in this
regard.
Steve
|
74.151 | batteries | PCBUOA::TARDIFF | Dave Tardiff | Tue Sep 05 1995 12:51 | 9 |
|
Thermostats typically get their power from the
system itself - they use battery power to run the electronics
and clock, and as long as they're LCD display types, this won't
be much of a load. I use an older mechanical-clock honeywell that
has a nicad in it, and it works fine as long as it's not turned off
for very long times, like an entire summer. My Sears electronic
unit has a low-battery light that'll warn you if it's getting low,
but mine's been running for years without trouble.
|
74.152 | | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, That Group | Tue Sep 05 1995 13:35 | 13 |
| > - What happens when they die (If for some reason I
> don't have a replacement handy, - do I pull the
> thing off the wall in order to switch my heat on?)
My Hunter programmable uses two batteries. Supposedly I'll
get a low-battery indication and you can change one battery
at a time as to not lose the programming info.
> - How often are people finding they need to be
> replaced (the batteries).
I've had mine for about 3 years and have yet had to change
the batteries.
|
74.153 | Get a good Tstat | HPS126::WILSON | | Tue Sep 05 1995 14:17 | 64 |
| re .145
A good programable thermostat for a heat pump system can't help but pay
for itself. Both by making sure that emergency heat comes on when it
should, and by permitting setback without resistance heat comming on
during recovery.
We have had our heat pump now for one heating and cooling season, and
are now ready to finalize the control system.
Our heat source is a drilled well (1100 feet, ouch!), and the heat pump
is a five ton unit, we can either dump the water to a leaching pit, or
return the water to the well. In addition to the heat pump we have a
water coil in the return air duct where raw 55 degree well water can
cool the air to about sixty degrees. For cooling this brings the total
to about seven and and a half tons of cooling. For emergency backup
there is 20 KW of resistance heat.
The programable Tstat can be programmed for four periods a day, seven
days a week. I would not want any fewer periods for heating. For
cooling I use the programability very little. We found that we could
set back to 64 at 10PM, increase to 66 at 6 AM, 68 at 11 AM, and 72 at
4PM, at not use any resistance heat. Using this schedule also worked
for the well as we could dump all the water in the leaching pit,
providing the warmest water for the heat pump, about 54 degrees during
the coldest part of the winter.
Attempting to recover more than about four degrees at a time would
cause the resitance heat to come on, and for the well pump to run about
twice as long.
We actually had more experimentation for cooling as we could cool with
just by pumping water and air, use the refridgeration, or both. The
well was a consideration as we knew we could remove 6 GPM 24 hours a
day seven days a week, but with both the water coil and refridgeration
we needed 20 GPM. The solution was to adjust the dumping to the leach
pit to about 8 GPM and return 12 GPM to the well when both were on.
The EERs were about 22 for water and air, 12 for both, and about 9 for
just the heat pump. At the start of the cooling system, I tried using
just the water and air, and this worked OK if it was left on all the
time. But running 1.5 KW 24 hours a day adds up too.
By the end of the season our method of operation was turn the
system off when we were out of the house, and run both with the
compressor set to turn off at 76 when we were there and wanted cooling.
Shortly after the system is turned on, about 10 minutes, the dew point
drops dramatically so that 76 is comfortable.
We needed the thermostat to turn on emergency heat a couple of times
during the winter as one of the water valves was plugged by sand, and
a safety on the compressor would trip. The algorithym used is if the
actual temperature is more than four degrees lower than the set point
or if the temperature is more than two degrees lower and has been for
thirty minutes then the resistance heat comes on.
In summary a good thermostat will allow a heat pump system to use set
backs, and turn on the emergency heat when the compressor fails or more
capacity is needed. The last place to save any money on a heat pump
system is the thermostat. Also the thermostat has a four minute time
that will not permit the compressor to restart after it has shut off.
|
74.154 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Sep 06 1995 09:42 | 26 |
| > <<< Note 397.150 by QUARK::LIONEL "Free advice is worth every cent" >>>
>
>the primary power comes from the furnace,
>not the batteries (which serve as a backup of the program and clock in case
>of power failure.)
Actually, the batteries power the thermostat while heat is pumping.
In a simple two wire system (heat only, no separate fan or A/C),
the two wires feed a high impedance 24 volt level to the thermostat.
When heat is called for in the room, the two wires are shorted together.
(This is exactly what happens in a simple bimetal, mercury activated
passive thermostat.)
The shorting signals the heating system to provide heat, but it also shorts
out the 24 volts, leaving no system power to run the thermostat.
(The "high impedance" aspect of the 24 volts is to current-limit the effect
of shorting the wires at the thermostat.)
So the batteries take over, holding the clock settings and the program.
I have had occasions when my batteries have been weak and didn't fail UNTIL
the heat turned on.
Steve is right - when batteries fail, the thermostats (that I have seen)
do go into a fail safe mode - normally 70 degrees, with no clock or
setback ability - just like a simple passive thermostat.
- tom]
|
74.155 | | EVMS::MORONEY | DANGER Do Not Walk on Ceiling | Wed Sep 06 1995 11:20 | 20 |
| re .154:
>>the primary power comes from the furnace,
>>not the batteries (which serve as a backup of the program and clock in case
>>of power failure.)
>Actually, the batteries power the thermostat while heat is pumping.
Not necessarily. My setback thermostat gets power from the furnace
even when calling for heat. It has a step-up transformer in series
with the furnace contacts which supply it with power when heat is on.
The result is the circuit as seen by the furnace is not a simple on-off
switch, there is a 1-2 volt voltage drop when calling for heat from the
transformer winding, but this doesn't affect anything unless the supply
voltage was marginal to begin with.
It works fine with the battery totally removed, other than instant programming
loss if the power goes out for more than a microsecond.
-Mike
|