T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
164.1 | | BEING::WEISS | | Mon Nov 25 1985 10:32 | 17 |
| Get a probe-type stove thermometer, and install it above the converter. You
can use the magnetic stick on types, but they're not as accurate. When you
start up a fire, let it burn with quite a bit of air until the temperature is
greater than 560 degrees, then you can turn back the stove as far as you want.
The catalyst starts working at that temperature, and once it gets going it will
keep itself hot even if the stove itself is just smouldering.
One other thing - don't burn paper with colored ink on it. The ink often has
heavy metal oxides in it that wreck the converter. Sort of like putting leaded
gas in a car with a converter.
The converter will wear out in 1-3 years, depending on how much wood you use.
You'll be able to tell because the temperature above the converter will go down.
With a new converter, and the stove running at a reasonable temp, it will often
be 1100-1400 degrees F.
Paul
|
164.2 | | JOET::JOET | | Mon Nov 25 1985 10:46 | 6 |
| re: .1
1100-1400 degrees?!? Can regular stove pipe handle that kind of
heat?
-joet
|
164.3 | | BEING::WEISS | | Tue Nov 26 1985 07:58 | 11 |
| I assume if it is well shielded from combustible surfaces that it must be able
to, since they sell the things with no warnings. I have a stove with the
converter built in, and I think the hottest it has gotten to (right over the
converter) is about 1250. It often runs cooler, in the 800-1000 range. But
when the converter is running it is rarely less than 800.
One other thing - get the converter as close as possible to the stove. Think
of how hot you would have to run the stove to get the pipe up to 560 four feet
away.
Paul
|
164.4 | | MUTT::WAGNER | | Tue Nov 26 1985 12:59 | 13 |
| This reminds me. I have one which I will sell. I will get the details and
place it in here. I purchased it a year ago and never used it (we sold the
house with the wood furnace, or was it the furnace with the house ??)
It fits an 8" flue. has the thermometer built in. A well built unit. It was
one of the best units during a rating test (again, I have to dig up the info).
It cost $200 new and I will let it go for $100. It's still in the original
box
If anyone would like additional info send mail to MUTT::WAGNER
Merle
|
164.5 | | ELUDOM::CLARK | | Tue Nov 26 1985 23:28 | 11 |
| Does anyone know what Vermont Castings has to say about adding a catalytic
converter to one of their stoves (we stopped getting their irregular newspaper
some time ago)?
I'm specifically interested in a Defiant.
By the way, the flue thermometer about 3 feet above our Defiant typically
runs 550 - 650 degrees with the damper closed and 1000 degrees or more
with the damper open.
-- Ward
|
164.6 | | JOET::JOET | | Wed Nov 27 1985 08:28 | 11 |
| re: high temps
I have several books on woodburning, but they, and the info that comes with the
stoves, are woefully lacking in details. The flue thermometer I bought has
a grey zone ("low") up to about 300, a white ("normal") up to about 475,
and a red ("danger") above that. I assumed (silly me) that stack temperatures
should fall in the white range. 1000 degrees w/o a catalyst!?!?
At what temperature does the stove get cherry red? :-)
-joet
|
164.7 | | DELNI::HARROW | | Wed Nov 27 1985 09:21 | 17 |
| Speaking of stoves, I'm recently transplanted from Atlanta to NH and now
am the proud owner of a Vermont Castings Intreped (small) wood stove. This
airtight stove has a two position damper: in the OPEN position it allows
the exhaust gases to go straight up the stovepipe, and in the CLOSED position
it recirculates the gases into another combustion chamber (NO catalyst, I
believe) which is heated and gets pre-heated outside air. The intent is
to burn all of the combustables in the exhaust gases and, I assume, get more
heat.
However, when I close the damper, the stove seems to run cooler (via a stick-on
thermometer on the stovetop).
The manual that came with the stove is somewhat confusing, and I don't really
know what to expect. Any ideas?
Jeff
|
164.8 | | BEING::WEISS | | Wed Nov 27 1985 11:08 | 34 |
| re:Vermont Castings
These stoves have what they call "Horizontal Burn", which means when the damper
is closed the air comes in at one side of the bottom, and the smoke goes out the
other side, also at the bottom. The smoke then goes through a zig-zag path up
the back of the stove, where it is supposedly exposed to more heat from the
firebox, and can burn some of the gasses in the smoke. The stove will run much
cooler with the damper closed, because only the wood on the bottom is burning,
and the smoke has to travel such a long, twisted, path that the air flow is
lower. When the damper is open, the flames come right up through all of the
wood, plus the airflow is greater, so the stove temperature is much hotter.
However, when the damper is open, large amounts of heat go right up the flue,
much like a fireplace. Although the stove is cooler with the damper closed,
more heat is extracted from a given quantity of wood, and the stove will burn
much longer.
About two years ago V.C. came out with what they call an 'energy extender.'
It is a sort of box that attaches to the flue opening and hangs down behing
the stove. It has a catalytic converter in it, and as close as I can tell
is a compromise between an integrally designed converter and a normal stovepipe
one. It has a long smoke passage and lots of surface area so you get more
heat out of it than you do from a stovepipe one, but less than you would if
the converter were built right into the stove. Plus I think it is ugly,
which is a real shame because the V.C. stoves look so nice to start with.
I'm not sure if they even make one that would fit the Defiant, I think they
started with just ones that would fit the Vigilant and Resolute.
Another thing that you might try: On a Vigilant, anyway, the opening to the
smoke passages in the back of the stove is about 3-4" square. My father has
one, and he's been thinking of buying a standard 5" diameter converter and
cutting it down to size to fit in that hole. You'd get more heat out of it
that way, since it would be right inside the stove.
Paul
|
164.9 | | CASTOR::PETROVIC | | Wed Nov 27 1985 11:32 | 21 |
| Re: Catalytic dampers/converters and stack temperatures...
I've got an add-on combustor as well as a 'heat extractor' on the set-up
in my house and I've not worried about excessive temperatures. The combustor's
just below the extractor and the final temp. of the flue gasses appears to be
about 40% of the combustor inlet temperature.
The biggest benefit I've seen from having the cumbustor is the reduction of
creosote in the exterior chimney (mine's 6" Oliver-McLeod insulated).
According to the manual that came with the combustor, it's supposed to reduce
the creosote build-up by 90% as well as increase the heat output by some 40%
The heat-extractor (trade name Magic Heat) does even better in that it gets
another 40% or so back from the 'cleaned' flue gasses.
BTW...my stove (stamped sheet metal) starts to get red at about 900 degrees
needless to say, it dosen't stay that way long...I like to keep the temp.
down to conserve on wood. Before I put the combustor on, I'd have to load
at least twice over the course of a night...now it goes all night...
|
164.10 | | CACHE::BRETSCHNEIDE | | Wed Nov 27 1985 12:05 | 24 |
| One of the responses inquired about the temperature at which the stove begins
to glow. For those who are interested, here is a color temperature chart
for steel (reprinted without permission from Machinery's Handbook, 18th Edition.
Degrees C. Degrees F. Color
400 752 Red heat, visible in the dark
474 885 Red heat, visible in the twilight
525 975 Red heat, visible in the daylight
581 1077 Red heat, visible in the sunlight
700 1292 Dark red
800 1472 Dull cherry-red
900 1652 Cherry-red
1000 1832 Bright cherry-red
1100 2012 Orange-red
1200 2192 Orange-yellow
1300 2372 Yellow-white
1400 2552 White welding heat
1500 2732 Brilliant white
1600 2912 Dazzling white (bluish-white)
Hope none of your stoves ever get past the dark red. If they do, you've
got quite a heat source!
BB
|
164.11 | | ELUDOM::CLARK | | Thu Nov 28 1985 14:00 | 23 |
| Back when I was stupid (I'm older, wiser and poorer now), I discovered a
"neat" technique for getting my Defiant up-to-temperature after putting in
a new load of wood: simply set the stove in up-draft mode (damper open)
and leave the door open a crack (1/4 to 1/2 inch). It works great.
HOWEVER, if you don't pay attention to the stove, after not too many minutes
the fire really gets going, getting WAY TOO HOT. A couple of times, I
compounded my lack of attention by leaving the room. The cracking of the
burning creosote in the stove pipe would get me back in the room before the
stove totally destroyed itself, but not soon enough.
On those occasions, I immediately closed down the stove and then made the
best of a bad situation: turn off all the lights and enjoy the beautiful,
glowing red, cast iron front doors on the Defiant.
The end result of this stupidity has been two cracked fire-backs (the first
one replaced by Vermont Castings under warrantee, the second replaced at
my expense) and slightly warped front door (not really a problem after
replacing the gaskets).
Moral: Be smart, but enjoy your stupidity.
-- Ward
|
164.12 | | BOEHM::ROSENBAUM | | Sat Nov 30 1985 01:33 | 4 |
| re .10 (colors of Hot Steel)
What is "red heat?" How does it differ from dark/medium/bright red?
|
164.13 | | CACHE::BRETSCHNEIDE | | Mon Dec 02 1985 12:59 | 11 |
| With respect to the color temperatures I listed in .10, you will have to
talk to a good blacksmith or 'old-time' machinist who has done some small
scale heat treating to get the differences in the shades of red explained.
I'm quite sure it is a very subjective call. Like knowing how much salt
is 'enough' in a recipe when it calls for a 'dash'. I would guess that 'dark
red' is a little brighter than the minimum needed to make the object appear
red without any question in the sunlight. I personally don't have calibrated
eye-balls, but I thought it would make interesting reading to include a color
chart for reference.
BB
|
164.14 | | JOET::JOET | | Mon Dec 09 1985 13:07 | 19 |
| re: .0
A note of warning about the catalytic combustor that prompted this note.
I got it at Spag's for $43.20. Unlike all of the others I've seen, it doesn't
come in a housing. All you get is a 10" cast iron ring into which the catalyst
honeycomb is press-fitted. The whole thing is between 3/8" and 1/2" thick
(much thinner than any other I've seen). Cheapness is the key word, here.
I installed it, and it worked O.K. for a couple of days. After that, the whole
stove didn't seem right for the next week. After I took the pipe apart,
I found that the honeycomb had fallen out of the holder and was obstructing
the flue.
I guess the rule is, "Ya gets what yaz pays for".
Spag's cheerfully took it back, and I think I'll spring for the $80 one after
Christmas. Stay tuned.
-joet
|
164.15 | | TOPCAT::BADGER | | Wed Dec 11 1985 10:29 | 9 |
| I once used one of the gizmoes. The stove came gizmoe ready. Paid my
$150 for it. I donno, mybe just me, but my stove seemed more effecient
without it. And in the end, I took it to the dump.
The thing that puzzles me is one that can be put in the stove pipe. I
remember having to by-pass mine until the flue temp got high, then
flipping a lever to kick it in. Seems like the thing woulddd get clogged
at low temps.
Ed Badger
|
164.16 | | JOET::JOET | | Wed Dec 11 1985 14:07 | 7 |
| re: .16
You do have to bypass until the temp gets high enough for the catalyst to
activate. It's just like a regular damper with a control on it. When it's
vertical, the smoke goes around it, when horizontal, through it.
-joet
|
164.17 | | CASTOR::PETROVIC | | Thu Dec 12 1985 11:16 | 29 |
| re: .0,.15
There's a magazine, WoodHeat 85/86, that has a comparison of
several catalytic damper add-ons and heat extractors. There is a fair
amount of text and a chart with all the models discussed with pricing
information. I think you can get the rag at the stove shop, however,
you may have some luck in finding it at a large newsstand.
BTW...I've been having a bit of a problem with my damper (Catalytic
Damper Corp) and have gotten a procedure for testing the converter.
First, remove the element and carefully wire-brush off any fine ash that
may have accumulated.
Next, play the flame from a propane torch on the element. If things are
working OK, it should glow for a short time when NOT in the presence of
the flame.
Then, turn off the flame and turn on the gas WITHOUT igniting it. Play
the gas on the conveter and it should start to glow and possibly
re-ignite the flame. If all this happens, then your converter is
functioning, if not, see if there's a warranty claim. I've got a new
one coming for $14, pro-rated against the full replacement cost of $70.
Another tip-off as to the converter's activity is that after you've
turned off the gas, it will continue to generate heat until all the
accumulated creosote has been consumed. There probably won't be any
appreciable glow, just a fair amount of heat...
|
164.21 | Wood Stove Thermometers | AIEIO::FARRELL | | Mon Dec 30 1985 16:39 | 8 |
|
I'm looking for a good wood stove thermometer, the type that uses
a probe that is in the pipe vs the type that mounts to the outside
of the pipe via a magnet.
{aieio,thehut}::Farrell
|
164.22 | | SPEEDY::CLARK | | Tue Dec 31 1985 01:05 | 7 |
| I'd recommend that you get a probe thermometer that reads approximately
1500 degrees F at full scale.
We have one that calibrated to 1000 degree and it often does off-scale to
what I expect is 1200-1300 degrees.
-- Ward
|
164.23 | | VAXRT::WELLCOME | | Thu Jan 02 1986 10:37 | 29 |
| Re: .-1:
Why are you running your stove so hot? Cut it back to 600-700 degrees
and you should still be plenty hot enough to avoid creosote buildup
while saving on firewood. Or move the thermometer further up the pipe
(away from the stove). However, everybody seems to have their own way
of running a woodstove, so if you like the results you're getting at
1200 degrees, that's your choice. (Is the calibration off, perhaps?
Try putting it in boiling water and see if it reads 212. 1200 degrees
is HOT!)
But to the question at hand:
You can buy a stainless seeel probe thermometer graduated up to 1000 degrees
from:
Brownell's Inc.
Route 2 Box 1
Montezuma, Iowa
Cost is in the vicinity of $22, plus postage etc. Send them more than
enough (say $30) and they refund the overpayment with a check that
accompanies the order. They sell gunsmithing supplies, and their catalog
is (I think) $3. All sorts of weird and wonderful tools. I used one of
their 1000-degree thermometers in a woodstove stovepipe for several years
and found it very helpful. I'd run it at 500-700 degrees, mostly.
Another source might be the Omega Instrument catalog; there ought to be
some floating around the company someplace, or check for their ads in
some of the engineering magazines.
Steve
|
164.24 | | BEING::WEISS | | Mon Jan 06 1986 09:26 | 8 |
| re:1200 degrees
I suspect that ward has a catalytic converter. We have one, and it runs about
that hot just after the gasses come out of the converter.
If you don't have a converter, and don't intend to get one, 1000 degrees is fine
Paul
|
164.25 | | SPEEDY::CLARK | | Tue Jan 08 1985 02:02 | 18 |
| My stove is a Vermont Castings Defiant (with no catalytic converter). The
thermometer is mounted about 2 feet above he stove. It's another 3-4 feet
to the chimney.
When the stove is running in updraft mode with very dry wood and the air
inlet vent wide open, the reading on the probe thermometer can get above
1000 degrees. In order to get to this temperature, flames need to fill
the stove pipe (up to the chimney). You can also hear the crackling of
the creosote in the stove pipe burning.
When the stove is closed down, the stack temperature read 600-700 degrees.
By the way, checking the thermometer by putting it in boiling water won't
be very accurate -- 212 degrees is at the extreme low end of the range
of the thermometer. I suspect that even if this measurement shows accuracy,
there's no reason to suspect that the high end is accurate.
-- Ward
|
164.26 | | VAXRT::WELLCOME | | Wed Jan 08 1986 14:23 | 5 |
| I went over to Dunn Energy Center in Maynard this noon, and noticed
they have a probe-type thermometer that goes up to 1600+ degrees for
$14.95 or thereabouts.
Steve
|
164.27 | | EXODUS::HARROW | | Mon Feb 03 1986 11:22 | 13 |
| I have a Vermont Castings Intrepid, and am constantly confused by operating
temp. recomendations...
When talking about running the "stove" at an average temp. of 500 degrees,
is that with a stick-on thermometer 2 ft. up the stove pipe, or placed on
the gridle surface of the stove?
I just did a major cleanout of my stove (pulled apart all of the internal
air channels, etc.) and it now seems to run a LOT hotter, but still don't
know where to put the indicator so that I can run it "correctly".
Jeff
|
164.28 | Wood Stoves | TIGEMS::BROUILLETTE | Mike Brouillette | Mon Jun 23 1986 12:58 | 10 |
| I know that it is a little warm outside to be thinking about this
but I am thinking about buying a wood stove. The house I am going
to be putting is a 2 story, slab foundation, 1600 sq ft house.
I really don't know much about stoves so any info would be a boon.
Prices, sizes, and quality issues are some of the info I need.
Thanks in advance,
Mike B.
|
164.29 | See KRYSTL::STOVES | HBO::PENNEY | Bill Penney ICO/M02 DTN 269-2081 | Mon Jun 23 1986 13:45 | 5 |
| Try the Wood Stoves NOTEsfile on KRYSTL::STOVES.
Bill
|
164.30 | Jotul | BOOLE::GUTNICK | | Mon Jun 23 1986 16:27 | 24 |
| I bought a new wood stove last year. I've heated with wood for
years and pretty much knew what kind of stove I wanted.
I found that one can save some money by buying in New Hampshire,
but that's because you save on tax. I ended up buying at my local
wood stove shop, during their pre-winter sale. I had been in there
zillions of times for advice...they were always very nice and in
the end, I felt I owed them the sale. So I ended up buying here
in Mass. and paying the extra money for tax. I bought my stove
from the Wood Stove Shop and Mill in Acton.
I wanted a fireplace effect--hence a stove with glass doors. The
two stoves I considered were a Vermont Castings and a Jotul (I didn't
want a Hearthstone or a Consolidated Dutchwest or anything inbetween).
Friends who had bought Vermont Castings were very sorry. The stove
does not burn clean and it's hard to get a fire going.
The Jotul is very simple to operate. After a year of use, I'm still
real pleased. I got the enamel finish--it's holding up well.
Good luck!
|
164.31 | I *LOVE* my Vermont Castings Stove! | CYGNUS::VHAMBURGER | | Thu Jun 26 1986 14:32 | 20 |
| I am one Vermont Castings owner who is not sorry. I bought mine
about 5 years ago, burn three cords a year in it, and never have
a problem getting a fire going, even from a few sparks in the ashes.
It keeps my 5 bedrm gambrel nice and warm and has burned very clean
since I started drying my wood for 16-20 months. This next winter's
load has been stacked since last spring ('85) and winter of '87
is due to be delivered in July or August.
I think the biggest hassles and disappointments come from:
1. poor draft - chimmney not high enough to get a constant breeze.
2. damp wood - 1 year ain't enough!
3. owners who don't read the manuals....(don't we have a saying
about them within DEC also)
BTW - my model is the Vigilant from V.C. They have really excellent
customer support and rapport. They know what customer service is
all about. Also, as a N.E. co. the replacement parts are easy to
come by if needed.
|
164.32 | vigilant | RINGO::FINGERHUT | | Thu Jun 26 1986 15:38 | 13 |
| A common problem with the vigilant is that if you don't keep the
4 draft holes at the bottom clear, it doesn't get air. This is
why
people have trouble starting fires. The holes are only about 2
inches above the bottom of the stove, so if you have 2 inches of
ash buildup, they'll get plugged. Also, sometimes you'll see a
big white spot on the left hand door of the vigilant. This is from
the same thing. It is caused by the draft hole which is right
inside the door on the left (and runs along the left hand side)
becoming plugged. I used to have trouble starting my vigilant,
but once I started cleaning out the ashes more often, I haven't
had a problem.
|
164.33 | Tempwood | USMRW1::RSCHAVONE | | Thu Jun 26 1986 16:00 | 23 |
|
I have used a Tempwood stove for over 5 yrs as the only source of
heat in my house and have been extremely pleased with it.
It's made of rolled steel as opposed to cast iron. It is a top loading
stove, which I really like, 'cause you don't have to bend down or
over to load it or empty it.
It's made somewhere in Mass (I forget where) and is measurably cheaper
than a Jotul or Vermont Castings.
I have burned seasoned wood and green wood in the stove with no
problem. I cooked on it all the time, and I think that a chile
or spaghetti sauce simmered on a wood stove all day is unbeatable.
I have since moved, and no longer have a wood stove. I hope to
build my next house in about 5 yrs, and will build a hearth for
my Tempwood in that house.
Ray
|
164.34 | Warner stoves? | TIGEMS::BROUILLETTE | Mike Brouillette | Thu Jun 26 1986 17:04 | 2 |
| Has anyone used a Warner stove? Are they any good?
MikeB
|
164.35 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | | Fri Jun 27 1986 09:09 | 6 |
| Another vote for Tempwood as value for the money. It's totally
lacking in aesthetics, but it sure does work! Another advantage
to top-loading: ashes don't go all over the place when you open
it up.
Steve
|
164.36 | TEMPWOOD TOUCHE | MRMFG3::J_FORAN | | Fri Jun 27 1986 09:22 | 5 |
| I have used a TEMPWOOD for 4 yrs now and like it very much,top
loading is great and it burns so well that there's very little ash
left. In fact I'm looking for a used one, at a reasonable price
for my cottage. If you hear of one pls let me know.
|
164.56 | COAL STOVE RECOMMENDATIONS | PNEUMA::SNIDER | LOUIE -- LOUIE | Tue Jul 29 1986 13:35 | 30 |
|
I'm soliciting recommendations for a coal stove.
Three years ago I declared, "I'VE HAD IT AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE
IT ANY MORE!". So I thumbed my nose at NH Public Service who, up
until then, supplied me with very expensive electric current which I
would proceed to expend into resistance heaters in my home.
I purchased a Surdiac coal stove which has done a beautiful job of
heating my entire home. That was one of the best decisions I feel
I've ever made regarding home management.
However, now I'm adding on and I feel that the addition will need
some supplimentary heat. Again, I'm looking to coal but I don't
know what kind of stove to purchase. My primary stove is a
Surdiac 616 (60,000 BTU) model but I will not require a large
model like that for the addition. So, I'm looking for something
that puts out 30-35K BTU. BUT!... an absolute requirement of it
will be real unattended burn time. My large stove will run for
12+ hours if necessary without a shakedown and I will need similar
performance out of the smaller one. Or at least a 10 hour unattended
burn time.
So the question is, do any of you have first-hand experience (or
even a good second-hand recommendation) with a small to medium
size coal stove that will meet my requirement? I would prefer a
convection type (Surdiac, Effel, etc.) but will consider a radiant
type also.
Lou Snider DTN 223-7718
|
164.57 | | BEING::WEISS | Forty-Two | Tue Jul 29 1986 14:42 | 5 |
| Also ask in KRYSTL::STOVES.
How do you get KP7 to work, anyway?
Paul
|
164.58 | This was asked elsewhere... | EUREKA::REG_B | Ninety nine .9 percent TV free | Tue Jul 29 1986 17:27 | 6 |
|
And see my reply in Home_work, I don't know how to make KP 7
work either.
Reg
|
164.59 | SET NOTE/CONFERENCE=xxx | DSSDEV::TANNENBAUM | TPU Developer | Wed Jul 30 1986 21:13 | 6 |
| Re: Making KP7 work
Use the command SET NOTE/CONFERENCE=KRYSTL::STOVES to associate
a conference with a note.
- Barry
|
164.60 | Help w/woodstove problem | AMRETO::KENNEDY | Mat Kennedy | Fri Nov 21 1986 13:00 | 49 |
| I have a Vermont Castings Vigilant that is approx. 3 years old.
It has been used 1 full season and only occasionally since then.
I've just started using it for the first time with the doors open
in a new (1.5 yr old) house. For some reason it smokes with the
doors open. I therefore cannot use it as a fireplace as it was
designed to. The smoke seems to come out steadily along the top
of the opening. It is enough to see in the room after 5 minutes
or so. This did not happen in the last house. Any ideas what the
problem might be?
The stove is on a brick hearth and stands approx. 10-12 inches from the
brick wall behind it. The pipe is the standard size for the stove (8"
if I'm not mistaken). The pipe goes straight up about 18" then turns 90
and goes approx. 12" and into the flue. The only thing different in the
system that I can see is that the builder put a slightly smaller (I
beleive it was 1" smaller) flue coming out of the wall than I had
on the stove. I had to use a small section to convert down slightly
before enterin the wall.
House is 2-story on hill top. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
BTW: Stoves works fine with doors closed.
See Diagrm below:
|
|
/-----\___|
/ |
| |
| __/---|
| | |
| | |
| | |
---------+----+ |
| | |
| Vigilant | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|_____________| |
/ \ |
-----------------------/--------------\-----+
|
164.61 | exit | AMRETO::KENNEDY | Mat Kennedy | Fri Nov 21 1986 13:01 | 1 |
| BTW: should add that chimney is clean.
|
164.62 | | THORBY::MARRA | John 3:3 is right. | Fri Nov 21 1986 15:50 | 8 |
| Perfaps you should ask this in the Wood Stoves Conference?
KRYSTL::STOVES
type KP7 (or select) to install it into your profile..
.dave.
|
164.63 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve | Fri Nov 21 1986 17:57 | 6 |
| Problem is not enough draft. I think you'll need to increase that
reduced-section stovepipe up to the 8" size. What size is the
flue inside the chimney? It ought to be at least 8x8, probably.
If you run with the door closed you're not trying to stuff as much
air up the chimney, so it works.
|
164.64 | | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck, DECnet-VAX | Sun Nov 23 1986 12:26 | 13 |
| Too LARGE a flue inside the chimney can also reduce draft, as can
too small a flue or too many bends. I have a 12x12 flue, and it
takes quite a while for it to warm up after I start a fire; after
that, my draft is much better.
Also, the differential between inside and outside temperature
has a large bearing on the strength of the draft - if you don't
try to run as a fireplace if it's relatively warm outside (above
40�) and/or wait until the fire has been burning long enough
to have warmed the flue well, you might have better luck.
This is all assuming you're not running your Vigilant in horizontal
mode with the doors open...
|
164.65 | NOT ENUFF AIR?????? | MENSCH::FALKOWSKI | | Wed Dec 03 1986 12:41 | 11 |
| Here's my $.02. Not only should you follow the other replies to
isolate the problem but also answer for yourself if this new 1 1/2
year old home is the super air tight construction. If it is, you
won't get enuff air from the room with the doors open. As a
quick check, open a window in the room with the stove going and
then open the doors. If no smoke comes out, getting more air into
the room is a solution.
good luck
Don Falkowski
|
164.66 | could be time for a cleaning | NAC::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Wed Dec 03 1986 12:57 | 5 |
| Whenever my stove smoked with the doors open I took it as a sign that it
was time to clean the chimney or at least get the creasote out of the
stovepipe. Worked every time...
-mark
|
164.67 | a similar problem | SQM::RICO | | Mon Dec 08 1986 09:11 | 24 |
| I have a similar problem with my woodstove. Mine is a Shenandoah
heater. It's a larger than usual, non-decorative type stove that
is in the basement. I have a heck of a hard time with smoke when
I try to relight the stove after cleaning.
My chimney is clean and my stovepipes are clean. Once the stove
is going, I have little to no problems, as long as I crack the
door when I open the stove for a few seconds before I open it
entirely.
I usually crumble up 6-8 sheets of newspaper, and then use some
old slats used for old plaster walls for kindling. That stuff
burns like crazy so I would expect no problems. But I get smoke
leaking out of the joints in the stovepipe, out of the door cracks
(yes, the door does shut tight), ARRGGGH!
The chimney is 6" by 6" I believe, cinder block construction.
The stove has an air intake regulator which I always open up
fully when lighting. I put a damper in the pipe which I also
open up fully before lighting.
Help! Electric heat is my other alternative!
Rico
|
164.68 | just a shot... | MYCRFT::PARODI | John H. Parodi | Mon Dec 08 1986 09:19 | 11 |
|
Some draft problems occur because it's hard to get the column of air in
the chimney started. So, you might try this little trick: Go through
your normal routine for starting the fire (newspaper, kindling, small
pieces of cordwood, etc.). Before you light the match, loosely crumple
one extra piece of newspaper and put it as far back into the damper or
flue as possible. Light this and let it burn for ten seconds before you
light the real fire. By lighting this first, you'll start the air
moving and the real firestarting materials catch more quickly.
JP
|
164.69 | Open a window | USMRW1::RSCHAVONE | | Tue Dec 09 1986 08:48 | 19 |
|
In my current house, I have a similar smoke problem, but it's related
to a fireplace, not a wood stove.
For some reason, there is almost always, a draft coming down the
chimney, regardless of whether the damper is opened or closed. When
I tried to light a fire last week, the smoke and flames were blowing
back into the house!!! I opened a window, slightly, near the fireplace
and, voila!, the direction of the draft reversed itself, and went
up the chimney, instead of down. I've tested this a couple of times
since then, and it always works.
So, my suggestion is to slightly open one of the windows near the
stove or fireplace before lighting.
rgds, Ray
|
164.70 | A little fresh air doesn't hurt! | MIZZEN::DEMERS | Chris DeMers Worksystems | Tue Dec 09 1986 16:41 | 12 |
| When my fire goes out I always have to open the door slightly to
start. The cold air in the chimney might as well be a solid mass.
I agree with .8, get the air moving in the right direction. Once
the chimney warms up, you should have no problem.
Don't be tempted to open a window upstairs. Many think that this
will cause the warm air to be drawn upstairs. In fact, the airflow
through the chimney is affected and the draft cound be reversed.
This gets messy!
-Chris
|
164.86 | Braun's in Leominster ? | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Mon Apr 06 1987 12:06 | 3 |
| Try BRAUN'S FIRESIDE EMPORIUM in Leominster (south side) -
534-8464 1177 Central St. (Rte 12); Leominster.
|
164.88 | | MAY11::WARCHOL | | Mon Apr 06 1987 17:33 | 7 |
| Bruce,
Since the oval pipe has the same circumference as the equivalent
round pipe is there anyway that you can "flatten" the round pipe
over a long run until it is oval and then use an oval elbow?
Nick
|
164.89 | | HOW::WHITE | Willie White | Tue Apr 07 1987 12:50 | 7 |
| I've gotten an 'oval to round' elbow from a Vermont Casting's dealer
before. It's meant to connect the oval openning on the back of
the stove with the round stove pipe. Is this what you need? They
also have straight pieces of oval to round pipe (as short a 12").
-willie
|
164.71 | Improve the Draft | FSTTOO::ELSHEIMER | TOM ELSHEIMER DTN 249-4915 | Wed Jul 01 1987 15:32 | 19 |
| This is a little late for the 86/87 heating season, but the 87/88
season is coming up soon. All of the other replies have good
posiblities to correct your problem. There is one the was not given
thought. What the heigh of your chimney above the crown of your
roof. For an 8 inch pipe/tile chimney, you need the top of your
chimney at least 3 feet above the crown of your roof. If the chimney
is less the this you will get the down draft with the doors open
or closed. You may not have noticed it, but most likly you got
smoke from the air intake with the doors closed. Less smoke this
was, harder to see. If your problem has not been corrected, give
this a try and see what the measurement is.
This would go along with not enough air for the stove and woud help
the air problem. Opening a window close to the stove is cheaper
then adding to the chimney. Also, you can get an out side air vent
that connects directly to the stoves air inlet.
Tom Elsheimer
|
164.37 | STACK Stoves | DECWET::FURBUSH | $#@%^&*#^% | Wed Jul 08 1987 15:20 | 4 |
| Has anyone had any experience with the STACK stoves from New Zealand?
They're fairly small and have a very clean style.
|
164.38 | Painting a Stove | DECWET::FURBUSH | So many acronyms, so little time | Fri Aug 07 1987 14:29 | 10 |
| (I have put the following note in STOVES, but I thought I'd reach
a wider group in this note.)
Has anyone had any experience painting their stove? I'm buying
a Lopi convection-type stove and I'm thinking about painting it
white. Since the stove is a convection-type, the paint will be
on the outer shell and not in direct contact with the metal surrounding
the firebox.
Any opinions or warnings?
|
164.39 | Use stove paint, but before it's cold! | VIDEO::PORCHER | Tom, Terminals Firmware/Software | Sun Aug 09 1987 00:00 | 8 |
| Yes, I've painted my ex-woodstove, with black "stove paint". Says
it's good to 1200�. The only problem is that the first time you
fire it up, it smokes like hell. After that, it looks great. Make
sure you paint it in the fall, when you can open all your doors
and windows when you fire it up!
This was painting a Tempwood, which only has a single wall firebox.
--tom
|
164.116 | Sealing sheetrock behind wood stove | BARNUM::SKIEST | | Tue Sep 08 1987 08:12 | 11 |
|
I was wondering if I could get some help on this one?
I have a coal and wood stove in my den in the corner
and I want to tile behind it. I was told to put up some
fire coded sheet rock and, to seal the sheet rock with
some type of sealer.. what should I use or not use any hints?
How would varnish or wood perservative work?
thanks for any help
steve
|
164.117 | use DUROCK | AMULET::FARRINGTON | statistically anomalous | Wed Sep 09 1987 13:02 | 4 |
| We built a floor shield for our stove and used DUROCK as a base
for the tile. I would suggest using the same. It will not burn.
Dwight
|
164.118 | How to clean a woodstove | TSE::LEFEBVRE | Weather's here, wish you were fine | Wed Sep 16 1987 08:30 | 9 |
| Any ideas on the best way to clean a wood stove? I recently had
renovations done to my basement and the stove is pitted with the
sheet rock/drywall dust from sanding. The stove is a Vermont Castings
Vigilant. I must also clean the masonry tiles under the stove as
well.
Any ideas will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Mark.
|
164.119 | cleaning a stove | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Wed Sep 16 1987 09:09 | 7 |
| I would use a wet sponge to clean off all the sheetrock dust then
dry it off well with a towel before any rust forms. When it's
dry spray the whole stove with stove paint. That will make it
look like new. (Remove the two handles, and thermostat from the back
before spraying it). Also remove the top cover which isn't supposed
to be black. That can be cleaned to look like new with muriatic
acid.
|
164.120 | How about masonry tiles? | TSE::LEFEBVRE | Weather's here, wish you were fine | Wed Sep 16 1987 09:28 | 6 |
| Thanks for the tip...
Now, how about the tiles. I am hesitant to use muriatic acid, as
it may break down the mortor base.
Mark.
|
164.121 | An Alternative | MURPHY::WARREN | | Wed Sep 16 1987 12:15 | 11 |
|
RE: The Stove
An option is to clean as stated in .1, then use 'stove polish'
(graphite) instead of paint. The paint tends to give off fumes
for the first few fires (that's my experience with flue pipes &
new paint). Polish also looks good but can be a bit messy on the
hands.
Good Luck!
|
164.122 | Cleaning a coal-stove pipe? | LDP::BUSCH | | Wed Sep 16 1987 12:40 | 16 |
| I've had a small Lange coal stove installed and in use for the past
5 or 6 years and I have never cleaned out the stove pipe. I use
some wood, mostly scraps of 2x4's to start the coal burning but
otherwise, it's strictly "pea" coal. I have assumed that since
there is no creosote to worry about, there won't be any buildup
in the stove pipe, and, so far, I've been lucky. It would be
difficult to clean out. The bottom of the pipe comes out of the
rear of the stove and makes a 90 degree turn. The fitting is
cemented in place. Therefore, I would have to get on the roof and
either get on a ladder to reach the top of the pipe, or disassemble
the upper portions of the insulated pipe to do the cleaning.
What say you? Does a coal stove pipe need cleaning?
Dave
|
164.123 | | JOET::JOET | Deatht�ngue lives! | Wed Sep 16 1987 13:55 | 6 |
| re: cleaning coal stovepipes
Yep. They fill up with fly ash. It won't produce a chimney fire like
creosote, but in excess, can completely clog your flue.
-joet
|
164.124 | Shop-vac? | STEREO::BEAUDET | | Wed Sep 16 1987 14:49 | 7 |
| Try using a shop-vac. I've cleaned out stove pipes without removing
them when I could get a long stick into the pipe to loosen/remove
the deposits from the pipe, then use the shop-vac to suck out the
ash etc. (You may need a long extension on the vac.)
/tb/
|
164.125 | s | NUTMEG::FOX | | Mon Sep 21 1987 22:00 | 7 |
| I have a Vigilant in my chalet and a Defiant at my house. Vermont
Castings sells the paint for touch up and a kit to replace the caskets.
i have done both stoves several times over the past few years and
they come out fine. Also Vermont castings runs specials each year
and will actually tear down the stove into all the pieces and rebuild
for something like $50.00. When you paint it the first fire smells
but its fine after that.
|
164.126 | Sulfur in fly ash cause corrosion | BIGA2Z::DUGDALE | | Fri Sep 25 1987 17:01 | 8 |
| re: .4 cleaning coal stove pipes
This is my third season burning coal and I have already learn the
expensive way that coal stove pipes need cleaning and the earlier
in the season the better. Fly ash from coal contains sulfer and
once the heating season is over, rain combining with the fly ash
forms sulfuric acid. These can cause corrosion of metal parts
including chimney liners, stove pipes, and stoves.
|
164.137 | wood stove water heater | SPMFG1::SILVAK | | Thu Oct 01 1987 20:55 | 7 |
| Hi one and all,
I just want to see if anyone has had any experience with a
gaget that is mounted within the wood stove which heats the water
before it goes into the water heater???
Are there any pro's or con's to the system????
s.f.
|
164.138 | Worked well for me! | TRACTR::DOWNS | | Fri Oct 02 1987 10:01 | 8 |
| I put a system together and it payed for itself in a couple of years.
I made a coil out of soft copper tubing, used a circulating pump
and another HOT water storage tank. The pump turned on when the
water in the coil got about 180 deg. and circulated it between the
extra tank and the stove. Makeup water for the existing electric
hot water tank came out of this preheated storage tank. Worked like
a charm.
|
164.139 | works great | STING::JELENIEWSKI | | Fri Oct 02 1987 14:27 | 37 |
| I made one about 4 years ago that I have been using since then.
It consists of a serpentine loop of threaded iron pipe (solder joints
will melt inside the stove) inside an Atlanta woodstove with a steel
firebox. I picked the Atlanta because it had a large steel firebox
which could stand the lost space due to all the piping being inside
and also it could be drilled to get the input/output pipes through.
It is important to use a proper combination pressure/temperature
relief valve also. I tied the woodstove loop into by baseboard
hot water loop, thereby creating a very efficient system of getting
the heat to the rest of the house without the hot spots and
stratifiation usually associated with stove heat. If the wood stove
is located in the basement the water will thermosiphon through the
system by itself, if it is in the living area, like mine, it must
be pumped via an aux circulator pump. There is a danger with my
system if the power fails during hot fire. The water inside the
stove will turn to steam (very dangerous), therefore the relief
valve. If that happens, the makeup water coming into the system
will cool everything down. (It does work, btw)
This system turned out to be so efficient in extracting heat from
the wood stove that I had trouble keeping the firebox hot enough
to sustain combustion. So I installed a ball-valve to slow the water
down so it would spend more time in the firebox (i.e. At full flow,
my baseboard units dissipated more BTU's than the stove could supply).
A safer, but less efficient way to do the same job is to use copper
tubing and make a serpentine loop placed in contact with OUTside of
the woodstove. Cover it with insulation then sheet metal. With
the soldered joints, even outside the woodstove you should not run
it without water, as this will cause a "meltdown". Its no fun to
rebuild, I know someone who can attest to that.
I have seen a commercial unit called "fireplate" (?)that looks like
it would work pretty well.
|
164.140 | Blast from the past! | SEINE::CJOHNSON | Never hungering; never thirsting. | Fri Oct 02 1987 14:50 | 5 |
| re: .2
4 years ago? It's been longer then that hasn't it? ;)
Charlie
|
164.141 | tempus fugis | STING::JELENIEWSKI | | Mon Oct 05 1987 10:43 | 2 |
| I guess time flies when your (warm)
|
164.354 | Creosote buildup help? | AKOV68::SHAW | | Mon Mar 21 1988 14:49 | 11 |
| Any suggestions to correct this problem would be appreciated.
We're having a problem with creosote buildup between cleanings.
The stove pipe is cleaned every 2-3 months.
The length of 6" diameter pipe is 16 feet uninsulated (inside) and
10 ft. (insulated) through attic and outside.
My question concerns reducing the buildup. We're burning DRY hardwood.
Would a catalytic converter help here? If so where on the pipe should
it be placed? Any suggestions are appreciated!!!
Rick Shaw..
|
164.355 | | AUTHOR::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Mon Mar 21 1988 15:22 | 15 |
| The easiest thing to do is to run your stove a little hotter.
Since you probably don't want more heat, you'll have to maintain
a smaller fire and stoke the stove more frequently, but with
smaller amounts of wood each time, and keep the draft wider open.
A smouldering fire, with the draft cut way down so you get a long
"burn" time, builds up creosote like crazy. I put "burn" in quotes
because with that kind of fire it's not really burning. Make sure
you have some flames going!
When I was burning wood, I found that a stovepipe thermomenter
was a big help; try to keep the stovepipe up around 300+ degrees
at least, better at 400+ degrees, and you won't get much creosote
at all. I ran a woodstove constantly for three or four winters,
and never had a creosote problem as long as I kept the temperature
up and the fire really burning.
|
164.356 | Also check woodburning conf (KRYSTL::STOVES?) | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | DECnet-VAX | Mon Mar 21 1988 22:51 | 16 |
| Another vote for a stack thermometer; I use mine to read my stove
the way you read the instrument panel of a car. (Or so I tell
myself.) I agree with the temperature suggestions in .-1 (I just
checked mine, and it's running at 450). I clean my chimney (around
20 feet of 12"x12" clay flue; real slow chimney!) once in the
fall and once around the first of February. But every chimney
is different.
When monitoring the temperature, watch it when you shut the stove
down for an overnight burn (if you run it this way); don't let
the stack temperature drop below 200-250. Creosote is created
when the smoke condenses, so the hotter the smoke, the less the
condensation. (Also, avoid metal flue caps like the plague -
nothing will condense creosote out of smoke faster than a nice
20 degree wind going across a metal surface. That was my one
chimney fire...)
|
164.357 | Addendum on catalytic converters | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | DECnet-VAX | Mon Mar 21 1988 22:55 | 5 |
| RE catalytic converters; I haven't got one so can't attest to
their effectiveness (my next stove will probably have one, if
only out of respect for my neighbors' health), but they only
work on smoke that's sufficiently hot - I think 350 and up. So
the same suggestions would still apply.
|
164.358 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Mar 22 1988 07:43 | 10 |
| > but they only
> work on smoke that's sufficiently hot - I think 350 and up.
Actually it's 600, but the difference is that once the temperature gets that
high, you can crank the stove way down and it will still stay that high from
the secondary combustion of the gasses. We have one and really like it, but
we don't burn enough wood to worry about creosote - we've heated the house so
far this year with about 2/3 cord of wood.
Paul
|
164.359 | You get some more heat too... | BEING::PETROVIC | Looking for a simpler place & time... | Tue Mar 22 1988 12:49 | 18 |
| re: catalytic converters...
Besides the benefit of reducing creosote buildup, you get back
some energy from the combustion of the creosote. Depending on
where your stove is (living room, family room, cellar) you may
want to consider an add-on coverter unit. The downside to this
is the ugliness of the unit. Usually, it's an 8" section of
heavy wall flue pipe in which is a damper that holds a catalytic
element, generally about 6" in diameter. Just plain ugly, but
effective if you obtain a high quality (read expensive) add-on.
The most efficient are those that are built into (designed into,
really) the stove. Consolidated Duchwest, Vermont Castings, etc
all have stoves that have combustors built in. These are the
most efficient.
Check with the manufacturer of your stove. It may well be that
they build an add-on.
|
164.360 | CRANK UP THE FIRE EACH MORNING! | DELNI::OVIATT | High Bailiff | Tue Mar 22 1988 16:31 | 11 |
| Have you tried just letting the fire roar each morning or whenever?
When we heated with Wood (7+ years in Vermont), we had to begin
each morning stoking up the Stove in the kitchen (later the furnace)
and letting it BURN for 15-30 minutes to make sure the pipes got
HOT and burned out the buildup.
The advantage was whomever got up after the stoker, had a warm house
to enjoy.
By the way, do NOT do this if you cannot stay around to monitor
the stove and dampen it down if things get too hot.
|
164.361 | Spray-on anti-creosote chemical experiences? | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | DECnet-VAX | Tue Mar 22 1988 17:56 | 25 |
| To amend my earlier note, I would advise keeping the stack
temperature at 250� or above, not 200. Even on overnight burns.
(This will depend somewhat on where you take the reading; my
thermometer is very close to the stove, since I just have a short
length of pipe leading into a fireplace.)
Running the stove hot once a day is a time-honored tradition (this
morning I had my stovepipe up to about 650-700 for a while, I
think), but it IS risky. If enough time has passed since I last
cleaned out (or at least examined) the flue, I don't do it. And
you have to monitor it; if I'm at all uncertain, I'll step outside
after I shut the air back down and eyeball the top of the chimney.
(That's how I found the fluecap fire I had years back; it's a
cheery sight, those merry flames at the top of your house.)
Another possibility: there is on the market some chemical that
you can spray on your wood before putting it on a hot fire; when
it rises with the smoke it is supposed to cause the creosote
on the flue to break down and flake off. I've used it sporadically,
but not enough to be sure it works or how well (really should
get two identical chimneys on two stoves and use the stuff in
one in otherwise identical fires...). It's supposed to be safe
for your stove and the environment. Any other experiences with
it?
|
164.142 | Woodstove Installation Questions | BCSE::JAHNS | Dean Jahns ZK03-2X07 DTN 381-0739 | Tue Apr 19 1988 13:38 | 18 |
|
I've just moved into my new house and have yet to hook up my wood
stove. The house has a FHW heating system, fireplace on the main
floor, and a wood stove hookup in the basment about 2 feet from
the boiler flue. My question is how close can the wood stove sit
to the boiler? The basement is poured concrete and unfinished,
so I don't have to worry about combustible floor or wall material.
Do I use some sort of heat shield between the stove and boiler?
Or move the stove further to the side and have a double bend stove
pipe? Or move the stove further from the wall and have a longer
horizontal run ( but only one 90 degree bend)? The stove is the
small CDW Federal with Catalitic, if that makes any difference.
Thanks in advance for your experience!
Dean Jahns
|
164.143 | See conference TERPIN::STOVES | BEING::PETROVIC | Looking for a simpler place & time... | Wed Apr 20 1988 10:02 | 3 |
| You should be asking these questions to the folks in TERPIN::STOVES. In
fact, there is probably all the information you need already in the
conference.
|
164.144 | I already tried that | BCSE::JAHNS | Dean Jahns ZK03-2X07 DTN 381-0739 | Thu Apr 21 1988 10:07 | 7 |
| I follow STOVES and posted this question there over two weeks
ago without one response. I don't think many people are reading
STOVES now that heating season is almost gone. Since there is a
keyword in this conference (heating_wood_coal) and other woodstove
related topics, I figured why not?
-dj-
|
164.145 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Thu Apr 21 1988 10:18 | 8 |
| As I recall (possibly in error), there's a 3' minimum clearance
requirement between a woodstove and a combustible surface. Since
your boiler isn't combustible, 3' clearance ought to be plenty.
If you want it closer, a simple sheetmetal guard between the two
ought to satisfy any requirements.
Your best bet is probably to call your local fire department, since
I expect they are supposed to inspect and approve any woodstove
installations, and see what they say.
|
164.146 | | HPSMEG::LUKOWSKI | I lost my A$$ in the '87 CRASH! | Thu Apr 21 1988 12:29 | 8 |
| Re: .3
In Mass., the building inspector inspects woodstove installations
(or maybe just in Shrewsbury :^) ). I agree, the person that will
ultimately perform the inspection should be consulted for this info
as it can vary from town to town.
-Jim
|
164.147 | building inspector | HARPO::B_HENRY | Bill Henry | Thu Apr 21 1988 13:49 | 7 |
| A chimney (acording to mass law) is part of the structure so the building
inspector has jurisdiction. The fire department can give advice and do an
inspection and in some cases the building inspector wants the FD to do it, but
the fire department does not have jurisdiction . Also you should talk to your
insurance company, there have been cases (so I have heard) of only partial
payment being made because of a fire from an uninspected woodstove.
|
164.148 | it is now installed | BCSE::JAHNS | Dean Jahns ZK03-2X07 DTN 381-0739 | Fri Apr 29 1988 17:59 | 14 |
| Actually, I was more concerned with the effect the heat from the
wood stove wood have on the boiler controls, circulators, etc.
I have now temporarily hooked it up with putting it further into
the room (with a 6 foot horizontal run to the wall flue. This gives
it about a 3 foot diaganol distance to the boiler. The radiant
heat seems to make no difference in the feel of the metal surfaces
of the boiler.
Can a wall built with metal studs and sheet rock, being
non-combustible, be as close to a stove as you want it, without
breaking some code or other?
-dj-
|
164.149 | | DICKNS::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Sat Apr 30 1988 08:46 | 6 |
| The paper covering on the sheetrock might be a problem. For that
application, I don't think sheetrock would be "incombustible".
Even if it met the code, the heat from the stove would almost
certainly damage the paper surface over time.
Howe about metal studs, wonderboard, and tile (or something)?
(Wonderboard is basically cement, isn't it, and totally fireproof?)
|
164.174 | Furnace and wood stove on same flue? | MEMORY::BIRO | Larry Biro | Tue Sep 20 1988 09:53 | 16 |
| This specific issue appears not to have been discussed elsewhere
in this conferenece so I'm entering a new note.
I'm in the process of building a new house and was planning on
having a 3 flue chimney installed (one for an oil fired furnace,
one for our first floor fireplace and one additional flue for
a future cellar wood stove). I was under the impression that
each of these devices would require a seperate flue. However,
our mason suggested that the furnace and the wood stove can
share a single flue if both flue openings are close (12"-18")
and if the shared flue is of sufficient size. What are the
requirements for flue usage and is this a common approach?
Is this regulated strictly by local zoning codes?
Larry Biro
|
164.175 | | MTWAIN::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Sep 20 1988 10:37 | 4 |
| I'm not up on the exact details, but there are situations in
which you can (leaglly) share a flue between some devices.
It would be cheaper, probably. Personally, however, I'd go
with separate flues, if possible, and be done with it.
|
164.176 | | BPOV02::RATTEY | | Tue Sep 20 1988 11:51 | 4 |
|
check with the building inspector or fire marshell, seeing they
will be the ones that will have the final say.
|
164.177 | radius of pipe times pie ? | FRAGLE::STUART | | Tue Sep 20 1988 14:01 | 18 |
|
I have lived in 3 towns in which you are aloud to use 2 sources
in one flue. (So. Hadley, Pepperell, and Ashby Ma. )
There are two rules to follow....
1) the wood/coal input must be X inches BELOW the oil input
check building codes for X
2) the square inch area of the two inputs must not exceed the square
inch area of the flue.
check with your town codes . I have never had a problem using two
inputs in one flue.
Randy
|
164.178 | No standard guidelines | ROBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Tue Sep 20 1988 16:25 | 25 |
| I've had my oil furnace and wood stove sharing one flue for ten years.
The fire chief came out and inspected it; his biggest concern was that
all joints be screwed together and the stove safely spaced away from the
oil lines and the walls.
I had my insurance man come out; he made note of it, and assured me there
is no problem.
I *know* there's no problem, because it works. The wood stove has black
iron water pipes inside; the hot water is stored in a tank, and drawn
from to heat the house if the temperature is high enough. Otherwise the
furnace comes on.
What I have found (a number of people have come to see my system, with
the intention of copying it) is that regulations vary
from state to state
from county to county
from town to town
...and to see how enforcement of those regulations varies, re-enter that
loop.
There's no common denominator. I did it in Amherst NH.
Art
|
164.179 | There is a Mass code | MTWAIN::GREENMAN | | Wed Sep 21 1988 09:54 | 12 |
| If you go to your town/city hall, they'll have a copy of the
MASS or NH codes. In Mass, there is a formula you can use
for multiple appliances on the same flue. It has to do with
the height of the flue, the BTU output of the appliances,
and the diameter of the connecting pipe.
No matter where you are, you at least need a Class A flue and
the solid flue appliance must enter the flue at or some distance
below the oil/gas appliance. But it (the codes) sure can vary
between states and municipalities.
Charlie
|
164.180 | why must solid fuel appliance be below oil/gas appliance? | MEMORY::BIRO | Larry Biro | Wed Sep 21 1988 12:30 | 9 |
|
> the solid flue appliance must enter the flue at or some distance
> below the oil/gas appliance.
Anyone know the logic behind this requirement? Why does the solid
fuel appliance have to be below the the oil/gas? Is there potential
that incomplete combustion of the oil/gas can ignite?
Larry
|
164.181 | In Bolton MA... | HPSTEK::JORGENSEN | | Wed Sep 21 1988 12:55 | 13 |
|
I did enter a note in this conference concerning this very topic
about July of 1987... Oh well can't find it now. Anyway my
understanding was that the law varies town to town, but I know
that in Bolton the rule is that the combined area of the
two separate flues can not be greater than the area of the
single flue into which they feed. Also, if an oil fired furnace
and a wood stove are on the same flue, the furnace must be vented
above the stove, and must be at least 12" above the stove flue.
I'd also check the WOOD_STOVES notes conference... on CRYSTL::
(?).
/Kevin
|
164.182 | >< | MERLAN::GREEN | I can't see,You're on my foot! | Thu Sep 22 1988 13:26 | 8 |
| Funny..I thought that sharing a flue with a oil/gas burner and a
woodstove was a no-no. What about gas burners with pilot lights
and a wood stove, or do gas burners have elctronic ignitions. Or
a gas burner that turns on without a spark/flame, fills the burner
and flue with gas with a wood stove burning away next door...sounds
funny to me.
~jeff
|
164.183 | why wood/coal below gas/oil | MTWAIN::GREENMAN | | Thu Sep 22 1988 13:46 | 26 |
| The reason the wood/coal stove must be vented at or below (and
apparently this is different in different places) the gas/oil
burner has to do with monoxide. If the wood/coal stove plugs
the flue, due to falling creasote or ash, you'll know it because
the house will fill with smoke -- it is not insidious. If the
gas/oil burner was vented below the wood/coal stove, it would
happily fill the house with monoxide and kill you. The Mass
code (which apparently can be overridden by municipalities)
says 'at or below' for this reason -- I don't remember if there
was a specified amount 'below' but a foot sounds good.
Obviously if you're running a solid fuel appliance you must be
more careful, and should have a clean-out door at the base of
the flue and you should check it. If you're burning wood, you
should be doubly careful as you can generate a flue fire with
a wood stove (NOT with a coal stove).
But, assuming you follow code and screw together ALL flue pipes
(both wood/coal AND gas/oil), watch your distances to flamable
surfaces, and maintain the flue and pipes, it's quite safe and
done all the time. I've been running a coal stove into the same
flue as a gas furnace and later a gas boiler for years with
no problems. (I used to be a prof fireman and am aware of the
myriad ways you can burn a house down.)
Charlie
|
164.184 | | ARGUS::RICHARD | | Thu Sep 22 1988 17:45 | 6 |
| In Fitchburg, Ma., a gas furnace and wood stove cannot go together
on the same flue at all. With an oil furnace, I believe it can,
but I would find out what the Fire department has to say about it
first. I do know that the metal pipes for the exhaust of both
furnace and for the wood stove have to be secured with sheet metal
screws.
|
164.185 | Check with the inspector, I got two on a flue | PALMER::PALMER | half a bubble off plumb | Fri Sep 23 1988 08:38 | 8 |
|
My building inspector allowed me to put a natural gas hot water
heater and an oil fired FHA burner on the same flue. I just had
to vent the gas above the oil. The reasoning was that the gas pilot
light could go off, pouring gas into the flue. If it is vented
below the oil fired burner, the burner could go on and ignite the
gas.
=Ralph=
|
164.186 | OK, IF NOTHING GOES WRONG | HPSMEG::HOLEWA | | Fri Sep 23 1988 13:49 | 10 |
|
Yes, connecting a wood/coal stove to the same flue is ok if
nothing goes wrong with the oil burner. However, what happens
if your oil burner fills up with oil and unburned fumes. I'd
be very concerned about a spark or a chimney fire getting down
to the chamber. Even though the flashpoint of #2 oil is 115F
I still wouldn't take the chance. Spend the extra $$$ and be
safe.
Joe
|
164.150 | coal stove install questions | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Wed Nov 02 1988 17:06 | 30 |
| <<< TERPIN::DUA0:[NOTES$LIBRARY]STOVES.NOTE;1 >>>
-< MOTHER NATURE'S WARMTH >-
================================================================================
Note 338.0 Surdaic installation advice (yet another) No replies
27958::DONNELLY "Take my advice- Don't listen to me" 23 lines 1-NOV-1988 23:27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm in the process of installing a Surdiac coal stove in the basement into
a fireplace and have some questions.
The basic set up is like this: Stove (5" pipe), 5" barametric damper,
length of horizontal pipe, 90 deg. elbow, length of vetical pipe, 45 deg
elbow, new damper plate with 1 ft. pipe cemented in it, another elbow, a
length of pipe to get about 4 ft. up to the 6x10 inch flue tiles.
This sound right?
Does the installation need to be inspected? By who? At what point?
What's a ceramic thimble and should I cement one into the damper plate
instead of a std black pipe?
Does the pipe need to continue up to the fluetiles?
How do I set the barametric damper?
Does anyone have an owners/operators manual for a Surdiac 516?
And lastly, is it ok for the glass to be clamped tightly with a new gasget
or does it need to be loose for expansion?
Any other recomendations welcome,
Craig
Anyone who answers all questions gets a free piece of coal through
interoffice mail.
|
164.151 | connecting stove pipe to flue | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Thu Dec 15 1988 18:09 | 30 |
| I, too, have asked the following in the STOVES conference with no
response. I've also looked at note 1590 in this conference, which
seems related, but I've let the titles of the topics influence my
placement of this note.
Anyway, our stove pipe connects to the flue through what looks like
flue liner -- pinkish-red, roughly rectangular. The pipe is 7 inches
in diameter, while the flue liner is 7 inches square. As we all know,
you can't get a square peg into a round hole, so we have gaps in the
four corners. Currently the gaps are plugged with some sort of
insulating material; I'm not sure whether it's fiberglass or ceramic
wool or rock wool or whatever.
What's the best way to plug these gaps? Do we need to put some
sort of trim ring around the stove pipe, and if so, how do we fasten
the ring to the wall?
Also, how far should the stove pipe extend into the connections.
It's pretty clear that the horizontal flue liner extends all the
way to the flue; I hope it terminates at the wall of the flue and
doesn't extend inside. The stove pipe extends about halfway into
the horizontal liner, giving us a nice black coating on the inner
half of the liner after only two uses. I presume this is normal,
since the vertical chimney lining no doubt gets its own coating,
but I wonder whether we should replace the horizontal pipe with
a longer piece that will go most of the way to the flue.
Thanks,
Gary
|
164.152 | Filling flue gaps | AKOV68::LAVIN | | Wed Dec 28 1988 17:40 | 48 |
|
First the general information ...
If you don't have a detailed understanding of stove installations, you
should read up on the subject to make sure you do it right and do it
legal. You can get a great overview of installations from the
Consolidated Dutch West Catalog with installation planner. Call CDW in
Plymouth MA and have a catalog sent out. Read through the STOVES
notes file for lots of additional helpful information.
Second, the inspection issue ...
You should have your installation inspected to protect your insurance.
Call your town hall to see who does them in your town. I wouldn't think
yours had been before, since the open gaps don't sound like they would
pass inspection. There are a variety of code requirements that you
should meet. Your local inspector should have a handout or advice to
make sure what you do is ok.
Third, some specific hints ...
If this is a stove to fireplace installation, get a kit and/or
parts from a stove shop to install. If it is a stove to chimney
installation read on ...
> What's the best way to plug these gaps?
I had a similar installation. I used masonary cement to fill the large
gaps and furnace cement to seal the pipe to the new cement. Clean
everything first and wet the surfaces to help the cement stick.
> Do we need to put some
>sort of trim ring around the stove pipe, and if so, how do we fasten
>the ring to the wall?
They sell trim rings for stove pipes that will cover the entry of the
pipe into the wall. They slide over the pipe and stay in place with
spring clips. You can get a variety of plain black round or decorative
square trim rings at most wood stove shops. The 7" might be a problem,
6 or 8 is standard.
> Also, how far should the stove pipe extend into the connections.
I read a lot of material on installations and I've never seen a spec
on this. My building inspector didn't seem to care. Running it all the
way in wouldn't be a bad idea.
|
164.153 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | PDS, our next success | Wed Dec 28 1988 20:33 | 30 |
| re: .10
I have the CDW catalog, and I've read through the STOVES notes file. I
also have the book "Wood Heat Safety." The stove has already been
inspected and a permit issued -- makes me wonder about the whole
inspection process, though to be fair, it was probably the former
inspector who issued the permit. The current one seems much more
reliable. I still need to pick up a copy of the permit, though, to
send to the insurance company.
The installation is stove to chimney. The gaps are small enough
that we should be able to get away with just using furnace cement,
though I wonder how hard it will be to undo this when it comes time
to remove the pipe for cleaning (and especially when it comes time
to remove the pipe for installing an oil burner).
We picked up a cheap 7" trim black ring at Spags. It's purpose in life
seems to be just to help seal the openings; a concrete basement wall
hardly needs decoration. The trim ring seems to stay in place quite
well by friction, since the pipe is slightly deformed where it enters
the flue liner.
Since this is going to be replaced anyway, I won't worry about how
far the pipe goes into the connection. I feel better knowing that
it's not critical, and I see no reason to spend money on a longer
pipe.
Thanks for the info,
Gary
|
164.154 | not all stove pipe is the same | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Thu Dec 29 1988 08:42 | 14 |
| something I once wrote in here years ago may be worth repeating...
BEWARE OF SPAGS for stove pipes!!!
A number of years ago I wanted to save some money and bought my triple wall pipe
at SPAGS. when the time came to sell the house, the inspector (for the buyer)
pointed out that not only had the pipe rotted and if I had a chimney fire the
house probably would have went with it, but the pipe was definately NOT legal.
Incorrectly thinking all pipe was the same, I had simply bought what spags was
selling. I think (but can't be certain), that part of the problem was the
gauge of the pipe - it was too thin.
-mark
|
164.189 | Two wood stoves on one flue? | HPSTEK::SKIEST | Hit a motorcyclist GO TO JAIL | Tue Apr 25 1989 07:17 | 9 |
|
I planning on putting my wood/coal stove in my basement
and buying a small wood stove to put in my den to replace
the other. My question.
I have one chimney could I hook both stove into it?
Steve
|
164.190 | no | NETMAN::SEGER | this space intentionally left blank | Tue Apr 25 1989 09:09 | 1 |
| -mark
|
164.191 | | HPSTEK::SKIEST | Hit a motorcyclist GO TO JAIL | Tue Apr 25 1989 09:22 | 3 |
|
why?
|
164.192 | safety and draft | AKOV76::LAVIN | Oh, It's a profit deal | Tue Apr 25 1989 09:36 | 3 |
| I think it's illegal in MA. You can check with your local building
inspector (oh, oh, him again) to make sure. Usually it's one
appliance per flue. Two in one can cause safety and draft problems.
|
164.193 | | REGENT::MERSEREAU | | Tue Apr 25 1989 10:51 | 11 |
|
Re: .3
This is not always illegal in Massachusetts. I know of someone
in Mass. who has his furnace and his wood stove on the same flue,
and the inspector OK'd it. I'd ask the building inspector.
Also you might want to look in the STOVES notes conference. I
bet this has been discussed in there at length.
-tm
|
164.194 | xref | HANNAH::DCL | David Larrick | Tue Apr 25 1989 14:32 | 2 |
| Topic 2638, "Furnace and wood stove on same flue?", may contain
pertinent information.
|
164.195 | | ARGUS::RICHARD | | Tue Apr 25 1989 14:48 | 13 |
| Two wood stoves on the same flue does not appear to be a problem;
it should work O.K. But, a gas furnace and wood stove on the same
flue is a definite no no; also very dangerous. A oil furnace and
a wood stove on the same flue, I don't know about the laws on that,
but I would not since the wood stove would interfere with the
normal draft of the oil furnace, causing improper burn.
Many cities and towns (maybe a state law too) require inspection
of a new wood stove installation. As already mentioned, your local
fire department will help.
|
164.196 | two flues are better than one ?? | FRAGLE::STUART | it was a terrible vaxident | Wed Apr 26 1989 13:36 | 10 |
|
I have had wood stoves on both a gas furnace and an oil furnace.
For gas you connect above the gas flue and for oil connect below.
Of course check local codes and have it inspected !!
The other consideration is flue size, the rule is, the square
inch area of the pipes should not exceed the area of the chimmeny
flue.... in other words, don't overload your flue !
ace
|
164.197 | | HPSTEK::SKIEST | Hit a motorcyclist GO TO JAIL | Thu Apr 27 1989 07:25 | 7 |
|
My question is:
I want to burn COAL in my basement and WOOD in my
my den if need be.
My house is all electric I dont have a furnace.
Steve
|
164.198 | | TRITON::FERREIRA | | Thu Apr 27 1989 11:37 | 12 |
| Can't tell you about the legality check with you "Building Inspector".
A legal installation keeps you protected by your fire insurance.
If legal or you want to do it anyway... I would look into a
barometric damper for the coal stove. Since wood usually burn
much faster you may indeed experience more draft than your coal
stove is designed for thus causing a run away. Which in turn
could turn the coal grate into a pool of liquid cast iron. Not
quite that bad but would likely cause some severe warpage or
cracking rendering it less effecient.
Good Luck
|
164.199 | Oh no, not this insurance business again... | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Mon May 01 1989 10:41 | 14 |
| re .9
This insurance vs inspection code issue was debated in another note at
great length.
I do believe after checking this out with some insurance people
that the commonly held conception in this file that insurance will
not pay if your house burns down because of a code violation is
just not true.
You fire insurance should protect you regardless of inspections
unless there is blatant fraud involved (you violated code knowing
it would cause a loss).
|
164.200 | | VIDEO::FINGERHUT | | Mon May 01 1989 11:28 | 10 |
| > that the commonly held conception in this file that insurance will
> not pay if your house burns down because of a code violation
I think the misconception is propogated by chimney sweeps,
electricians, plumbers, building inspectors, etc.
If your insurance company won't pay for a loss because of a code
violation, you need a new insurance company.
|
164.201 | Yabut... | VINO::GRANSEWICZ | Which way to Tahiti? | Mon May 01 1989 12:59 | 8 |
|
> If your insurance company won't pay for a loss because of a code
> violation, you need a new insurance company.
Yes, and hopefully you will have survived to find a new one...
This is one "code" I'd pay particular attention to. I've seen too
many grisly stories on the nightly news...
|
164.202 | | BOSTON::SWIST | Jim Swist BXO 224-1699 | Tue May 02 1989 13:45 | 3 |
| My only point is that insurance is not a factor in deciding to what
extent you will follow code. Most codes make sense and should
be followed for reasons more important than insurance.
|
164.203 | Not generally a good idea | ATSE::GOODWIN | | Wed May 24 1989 14:55 | 22 |
| From what I've heard the main problem is draft, although there can be
more impoortant problem, depending on what you are mixing.
A chimney or stove pipe is an essential component of any combustion
system such as a furnace, stove, or fireplace. The hot flue or pipe
creates a draft that pulls the exhaust gases out of the combustion
chamber and fresh air in.
If you eliminate the draft, such as by having another flue opening for
air to enter the flue, then at the very least you can get poor stove or
furnace performance, and at worst you can get harmful gasses in your
house. Coal is particularly dangerous because it can produce carbon
monoxide and has wiped out more than one family who used an improperly
vented coal burning appliance.
Wood and oil are safer -- no CO, but gas, in case it somehow gets
loose unlit, can also be a hazard.
I would feel free to put two *wood* stoves on the same flue, provided
each one was either burning or closed up air tight at all times,
although strictly speaking, it's still not a good idea.
|
164.187 | What about combination Wood/oil systems | VIDEO::HARPER | | Thu Aug 24 1989 10:09 | 11 |
| Some of the replys in this subject are out dated. Especially .10
that says you can connect an oil burner and wood fired system into the
same flu in Fitchburg. My father-in-law is a retired contractor from
Fitchburg. He just installed a Newmac wood/oil system in my home and
has installed over 50 of these units all over the state of Mass and
N.H. and the inspector okeyed every one of them. There is only one vent
into the flu that is fed by both the woodburner and oilburner. The
system was purchased in Fitchburg and I don't think the BBB would let
a dealer sell a system that did not meet local codes.
Mark
|
164.188 | | TOKLAS::FELDMAN | Week 7: Final inspection (but still more to do) | Thu Aug 24 1989 11:43 | 18 |
| re: .13
I doubt that .10 is out dated. It''s just that there's a huge
difference between a combination system and two separate systems
connected to the same flue. Just because the combination system is ok
doesn't mean that separate systems are also ok. The combination system
is designed for that purpose (with a price to match), while the
separate systems have no features to protect against the hazards of
hooking the two systems into the same flue.
The BBB neither allows nor disallows businesses from selling anything.
They mediate disputes between business and customers, and that's all.
Since local codes very widely, there's no reason to prevent a Fitchburg
business from selling something that might be against Fitchburg code,
but legal in other municipalities.
Gary
|
164.205 | Poll for wood/coal stove users | MCNALY::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Fri Oct 13 1989 08:24 | 13 |
| 1. Is wood/coal heat your primary/secondary/sole source of heat?
2. What is your backup source of heat (if any) - oil, gas, electric, solar,
forced-hot-air, forced-hot-water, other?
3. How long have you heated with wood/coal?
4. How much wood/coal have you used per heating season?
5. When do you start burning wood/coal? Do you augment begin/end of season
with your backup heat?
6. If wood, how do you get your supply - cut/split your own, buy logs and
cut/split, buy cut-and-split, other?
7. If you personally have heated both with wood and coal, what were/are
your reasons for switching?
[also posted in OLUT::STOVES]
|
164.206 | I (heart shape) my coal stove | FRAGLE::STUART | tee many martoonies | Fri Oct 13 1989 10:15 | 12 |
|
1. coal - primary 1st floor, secondary rest of house
2. oil FHW
3. 7 years
4. 2 - 3 tons
5a. Oct-Nov (depends on weather) 5b. yes
6. ??? forgot the rest of the questions
I did burn wood for a short time, too expensive, too much work.
I own a coal/wood stove, I do burn wood this time of year and in early
spring to take the chill out of the house.
|
164.207 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Oct 13 1989 10:17 | 48 |
| > 1. Is wood/coal heat your primary/secondary/sole source of heat?
Secondary. Primary is solar. The house is passive/active solar with a large
solarium. We've lived in the house for 4 years and still haven't set up the
fans which are supposed to blow the heated air from the solarium through a
water-storage heat sink in the floor joists, but it does pretty well anyway.
> 2. What is your backup source of heat (if any) - oil, gas, electric, solar,
> forced-hot-air, forced-hot-water, other?
Tertiary (used pretty much only if we leave for a few days in the winter) is
electric.
> 3. How long have you heated with wood/coal?
4 years.
> 4. How much wood/coal have you used per heating season?
About 1� cord. I'm hoping, once we get the solar system fully working, to cut
that to a cord or less.
> 5. When do you start burning wood/coal? Do you augment begin/end of season
> with your backup heat?
We haven't started yet this year. Usually around the beginning of November,
but if we have a stretch of cold cloudy weather it can be earlier.
> 6. If wood, how do you get your supply - cut/split your own, buy logs and
> cut/split, buy cut-and-split, other?
We've bought some cut and split. I have about 3 cord in the yard that needs to
be split from some friends maple trees they cut down and didn't want.
> 7. If you personally have heated both with wood and coal, what were/are
> your reasons for switching?
Coal doesn't work well at all for our house. What ideally want to do with coal
is start a fire in November and let it go out in March. Perhaps that's a bit
extreme, but generally you want to keep a coal fire burning. With the solar
heat, we only need heat part of the time. Currently, on a sunny day, we use no
heat during the day, and the house would overheat if a fire was burning, even
if it was banked way down. I burn three logs at the end of the day to keep the
house warm overnight. I'm hoping when the solar is fully installed that the
house will stay warm overnight on its own, and I'll only need to use the stove
when it's cloudy.
Paul
|
164.208 | Less each year | CAMLOT::JANIAK | | Fri Oct 13 1989 10:35 | 101 |
| 1. Is wood/coal heat your primary/secondary/sole source of heat?
We heated a 'older' house in Concord, NH for 6 years almost
exclusively with wood. After moving to a newer home (age 11)
in Merrimack, NH in 1985 we continued to heat with wood for 3 years
then switched to coal for 1 year.
We started with an All-Nighter wood stove in Concord but it just
didn't work out. I traded that in for a Tempwood which we used both
in Concord and Merrimack. Two years ago I purchased a Surdiac coal
stove.
2. What is your backup source of heat (if any) - oil, gas, electric, solar,
forced-hot-air, forced-hot-water, other?
In Concord we had forced hot water (old radiators) heated by oil. The
boiler was a converted coal unit. During out tenure we did have to
replace the burner.
The house in Merrimack was built with baseboard electric heat.
3. How long have you heated with wood/coal?
6 years in Concord, NH. - wood
3 years in Merrimack, NH. - wood
<2 years in Merrimack, NH. - coal
4. How much wood/coal have you used per heating season?
6+ cords wood/year in Concord, NH.
3+ cords wood/year in Merrimack, NH.
? coal / year in Merrimack, NH. At this point I should mention that
the coal stove was NOT a real successful adventure. Coal is
a much more tempermental fuel than wood and I had trouble
keeping the coal stove going.
5. When do you start burning wood/coal? Do you augment begin/end of season
with your backup heat?
Last year I installed a force hot air system heated by propane. I
expect to use the wood stove infrequently this year, mostly to add
heat in the basement when we hit the real cold spell in January.
In the past I would start up the wood stove in October on the cold
nights and usually start in full time after Thanksgiving.
The cold stove would only run well once the real cold set in for
several days at a time. Two years ago I used the wood stove until
the real cold weather came in (December), then fired up the coal stove
for the colder months of January and February.
6. If wood, how do you get your supply - cut/split your own, buy logs and
cut/split, buy cut-and-split, other?
My first year I cut wood from a friends lot north of Concord and
hauled it in a small pickup.
The second year through the eighth year I purchased wood by the log
truck load every other year. That way I was able to season the wood
before burning.
I've split most of the wood by hand (12 lb maul & splitting wedges).
One year I rented a hydraulic splitter with a neighbor but found it
uncomfortable to work with and not that much faster.
7. If you personally have heated both with wood and coal, what were/are
your reasons for switching?
I really didn't like the coal much at all. On the few times the stove
worked well it was beautiful, great soft heat that was extremely even
and comfortable. But I disliked having to fiddle with it so much to
keep it running and relighting was a pain. The coal dust was also
irritating in that it doesn't clean up easily.
Wood is a different story. After several years I just didn't want to
expend that much time and energy. I still cut and split between 1 and
2 cords a year but I got tired of the time required and the pressure of
trying to make sure I had enough to go the whole season. I also looked
at the economics of it and found the savings questionable based on my
needs and changing lifestyle. In Concord we spent most of the winter
around the house with small children. They're no longer toddlers and
our schedules have us out of the house more often now, therefore it's
not as convenient to keep the wood stove stoked.
Last year we installed a propane fueled forced hot air system. The
convenience of a themostatically controlled system that requires
little effort on my part allows me the time and energy for other
projects and activities. I still have the Tempwood and expect to use
it occasionally for extra heat in the basement and for 'atmosphere'.
It's also my backup heat should we lose electricity in the winter.
(The furnace does require electricity for ignition and the blower.)
As for the coal stove I'll probably sell it or trade it for something
like a radial arm saw but just haven't got around to it yet, too many
other projects and activities right now...
-Stan
|
164.209 | wood... | CVG::ESONIS | What now? | Fri Oct 13 1989 12:42 | 46 |
|
1. Is wood/coal heat your primary/secondary/sole source of heat?
- Yes.
2. What is your backup source of heat (if any) - oil, gas, electric, solar,
forced-hot-air, forced-hot-water, other?
-Our backup is oil FHA.
3. How long have you heated with wood/coal?
- 7 years, at 3 different locations.
4. How much wood/coal have you used per heating season?
- between 3 and 4 cords.
5. When do you start burning wood/coal? Do you augment begin/end of season
with your backup heat?
- We start keeping the wood stove going in early to mid November. Prior
to that, the Oil FHA is used for heat (also some passive solar help
from large south facing windows.
6. If wood, how do you get your supply - cut/split your own, buy logs and
cut/split, buy cut-and-split, other?
- I split a 10 cord grapple load with my neighbor, and cut and split it
myself.
7. If you personally have heated both with wood and coal, what were/are
your reasons for switching?
- I haven't switched, but I may try coal at some point, mostly because
there's less work and/or expense involved in obtaining fuel.
Why are you taking a survey?
/Ske
|
164.210 | | BEING::PETROVIC | Looking for a simpler place & time... | Fri Oct 13 1989 14:01 | 66 |
| 1. Is wood/coal heat your primary/secondary/sole source of heat?
Secondary, although the primary system rarely comes on during
the heating season.
2. What is your backup source of heat (if any) - oil, gas, electric, solar,
forced-hot-air, forced-hot-water, other?
Oil-fired FHA
3. How long have you heated with wood/coal?
This will be the sixth season.
4. How much wood/coal have you used per heating season?
4-5 cords per year plus 225 gal oil
5. When do you start burning wood/coal? Do you augment begin/end of season
with your backup heat?
Mid- to late October until mid-April, augmented by the oil heat
during times away (vacation, visiting, etc). Oil heat cuts in
occasionally in the dead of winter after the stove burns out. We
try to keep the stove running 24 hours a day to minimize oil
consumption.
6. If wood, how do you get your supply - cut/split your own, buy logs and
cut/split, buy cut-and-split, other?
I purchase cut/split/delivered at the end of the heating season
to allow it to dry before the new season starts. I've found that
about 6 months drying time is sufficient for my needs. I built a
6-cord capacity woodshed which seems to augment the drying
process. BTW, I used to buy 4' splits and cut it down myself at
and realized a considerable saving; $70/cord vs. $85/cord.
However, you may not be able to find a dealer willing to sell in
4' lengths. In fact, mine first quit selling the 4-footers, then
quit the wood business altogether.
7. If you personally have heated both with wood and coal, what were/are
your reasons for switching?
Two reasons. First, the price of oil and the insulation of the
house made it difficult. Wood heat was clearly
cheaper, even after factoring in the cost of the stove and flue.
Second, the previous owner had a family room put on, but
neglected to tap into the existing heating system to warm it
up. The only way to heat that room was to kindle a fire in the
fireplace or direct woodstove heated air up the cellar stairs.
8. Given the choice of wood or coal, which would you choose?
Let's face it, messing around with 4-5 cords of wood per year
has worn out its charm. If given the chance to do it all again,
I'd choose a coal burner and augment it with the primary system,
whatever it is. A consideration for any wood/coal heating system
is the 'dirt' they create. Put a coal stove in the main living
area, you must be willing to live with the fine ash it creates.
Same thing with a wood stove, however, the ash is a little
easier to manage. My stove is in the basement, so it isn't that
much of a problem.
Chris
|
164.211 | just curious | MCNALY::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Fri Oct 13 1989 16:08 | 17 |
| re: .4
> Why are you taking a survey?
> /Ske
Sorry, you can't add a question to *my* survey.
Actually, we're coming up on our first wood-stove heating season and was
curious when others started heating. That led to wanting a little background
("*I* don't fire it up until it reaches 20 below") to "consider the source"
which led to other "just curious" questions.
But, Paul, (re: .2) three logs takes the chill off at night?!? What's normal
room temperature - 37 degrees? My stove absorbs at least that many before it
radiates any to the room. (Could be my novice-hood in evidence.)
|
164.212 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Oct 13 1989 16:20 | 15 |
| >But, Paul, (re: .2) three logs takes the chill off at night?!? What's normal
>room temperature - 37 degrees? My stove absorbs at least that many before it
>radiates any to the room. (Could be my novice-hood in evidence.)
Remember this is on the evenings of SUNNY days. The house is still warm (70�+)
from the solar gain by bedtime. The three logs make it about 65� in the
morning, except during the real cold snaps. The house has R45 roof, R30 walls
and window quilts. With the exception of a bay window area in the kitchen and
master bedroom, the house has very few windows that open directly to the
outside. For example, there are only two small (2'x2') windows on the entire
north side of the house. There is quite a bit of glass area between the house
and solarium, but that only goes down to 40� or so at night, so not as much
heat is lost there.
Paul
|
164.213 | | NRADM::KING | It shouldn't hurt to be a child!!!!!!! | Mon Oct 16 1989 21:18 | 34 |
|
1. Is wood/coal heat your primary/secondary/sole source of heat?
Wood heat all winter, we have F-G-E as a ULT. and have electic heat
2. What is your backup source of heat (if any) - oil, gas, electric, solar,
forced-hot-air, forced-hot-water, other?
See above
3. How long have you heated with wood/coal?
5 years
4. How much wood/coal have you used per heating season?
About 6-7 Cord of wood
5. When do you start burning wood/coal? Do you augment begin/end of season
with your backup heat?
When the temp stays below 40 degrees
6. If wood, how do you get your supply - cut/split your own, buy logs and
cut/split, buy cut-and-split, other?
I buy it from a local person cut and split at 24 inch lengths at $85 per
7. If you personally have heated both with wood and coal, what were/are
your reasons for switching?
Wood only...
Rick
|
164.214 | COAL | FSHQA2::DWILLIAMS | But words are things | Tue Oct 17 1989 10:46 | 53 |
|
This topic has been covered in great depth in the STOVES
file.
1. Is wood/coal heat your primary/secondary/sole source of heat?
Tertiary if there is sun during the day since our home is
passive solar.
2. What is your backup source of heat (if any) - oil, gas, electric, solar,
forced-hot-air, forced-hot-water, other?
Radient electric heat in ceilings (never used).
3. How long have you heated with wood/coal?
This will make winter number nine.
4. How much wood/coal have you used per heating season?
Average of one to two tons, depending of course on the
amount of sunshine, average degree days, etc.
5. When do you start burning wood/coal? Do you augment begin/end of season
with your backup heat?
First fire tends to be sometime in early November.
6. If wood, how do you get your supply - cut/split your own, buy logs and
cut/split, buy cut-and-split, other?
Not applicable.
7. If you personally have heated both with wood and coal, what were/are
your reasons for switching?
We found burning wood takes too much effort (lot of feeding, etc.)
for the size of stove we utilize. Our stove is in our family room
and burning wood made the room too hot. With coal, after learning
how ;-), it is very easy to keep the fire burning at almost any
desired temp (within the stove's range) for more than 12 hours
without any fussing. The heat from a coal stove tends to be
much more even than the heat from a wood stove. (Our coal stove,
which heats our entire home, is the second smallest coal stove
made - with a hopper which holds a maximum of 20 pounds but is
built to hold 15 pounds.)
IMHO, stoves are good for either coal or wood. None of our friends
who have purchase wood stoves with 'coal converters' have been able
to burn coal as comfortably as those with real coal stoves. Friends
with coal stoves have not been very successful burning wood.
[also posted in OLUT::STOVES]
|
164.215 | Augmenting the survey... | STAR::BECK | The question is - 2B or D4? | Tue Oct 17 1989 19:11 | 52 |
| Two important questions for wood-burners have been omitted from the survey:
8. Do you clean your own chimney, or have somebody else to it?
9. How often is your chimney cleaned?
...
1. Is wood/coal heat your primary/secondary/sole source of heat?
[Wood] Secondary upstairs (via hot air rising), primary at the lower level.
2. What is your backup source of heat (if any) - oil, gas, electric, solar,
forced-hot-air, forced-hot-water, other?
Other source is oil-fired hot-water baseboards.
3. How long have you heated with wood/coal?
Oh, around 10 years or so.
4. How much wood/coal have you used per heating season?
About 3-4 cords.
5. When do you start burning wood/coal? Do you augment begin/end of season
with your backup heat?
Depends partly on when I get around to the fall chimney/stove cleaning
exercise, how much wood I've got, and how cold it gets. Sometime around
mid-November to the first of December. I try to put it off...
6. If wood, how do you get your supply - cut/split your own, buy logs and
cut/split, buy cut-and-split, other?
I've done 'em all. Lately, I've been buying it pre-split, and supplementing with
wood from my property which I've felled, cut, and split.
7. If you personally have heated both with wood and coal, what were/are
your reasons for switching?
N/A
8. Do you clean your own chimney, or have somebody else to it?
Clean it myself. Couple of unfriendly cats in a burlap bag lowered down ... well,
actually, I use fiberglass rods and a "brush" which really is a set of steel
plates.
9. How often is your chimney cleaned?
Twice a year - around the first of February, and before the first fire in the
fall.
|
164.216 | what happen to OLUT::STOVES??? | FREMNT::REED | Oklahoma State athletic supporter | Thu Oct 19 1989 21:27 | 4 |
| Has anyone been able to get on OLUT::STOVES?
Charlie
|
164.217 | !YUP! | HPSTEK::SKIEST | WANT TO PLAY YOU GOT TO PAY | Fri Oct 20 1989 07:13 | 8 |
|
re:-1
YUP!
This morning...
Steve
|
164.218 | That ash goes somewhere. | BANZAI::FISHER | Twice a BMB Finisher | Mon Oct 23 1989 00:53 | 5 |
| one thing left out of the survey: How often have you repainted the
ceilings? Have you noticed that the ceiling needs repainting after
a few years? (sometimes only one).
ed
|
164.219 | oh yes, good question! | BCSE::YANKES | | Mon Oct 23 1989 09:46 | 11 |
|
Re: .13
Good question that I'd love to hear answers to. I'd like to
install a fireplace insert, but my wife's main objection (well, besides
having a very hot object around a ten month old baby -- but Becky won't
be 10 months old forever...) is the ash. She thinks that once we start
heating with an insert, the walls will never be clean again. Comments
on this? Thanks.
-craig
|
164.220 | | SALEM::DODA | Walker + Vikings = Superbowl | Mon Oct 23 1989 11:06 | 6 |
| I've been heating with coal for over 2 years now. Our family room
has white walls and a white drop ceiling.
I've noticed no discoloration so far.
daryll
|
164.221 | no problems from my woodstove | IAMOK::ALFORD | I'd rather be fishing | Mon Oct 23 1989 15:40 | 9 |
| re: painting
I've been using a wood stove as a secondary (primary when I'm
home and willing to fool with it...) source of heat for over 4
years, and haven't noticed any particular 'sooting' problems on
the walls or ceilings (all white).
deb
|
164.18 | | BEING::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Fri Dec 22 1989 10:57 | 4 |
| Actually, that would be a good topic for a new note. Feel free to go ahead and
start one.
Paul
|
164.222 | Corn Stove Experiences? | WAGON::HARRIS | Peggy Harris | Thu Apr 05 1990 18:38 | 13 |
| Does anyone have any experience with corn stoves? I've looked
through both this notes file, and through the STOVES conference.
So far, there doesn't seem to be much discussion on them.
Someone I know has a brother who bought one last year, and thinks
that they are great. The advantages of self-feeders, no dry air,
etc sound good. But, the other day I stopped into a stove shop,
and the salesman there wasn't all that sold on corn or pellet
stoves. He said that the hassle of storing the pellets is too
difficult. Since they primarily deal in propane logs, I'm sure
there is some biased.
Anyway, any comments on corn stoves would be appreciated.
|
164.223 | This isn't performance feedback, but some fuel for thought... | NITMOI::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Fri Apr 06 1990 09:17 | 9 |
| I don't understand what you mean when you say an advantage of self feeders is
no dry air? Could you explain?
Other than that, somehow I would feel strange burning food, even if it is only
animal food. If I really wanted to go with pellet sized fuel, I would prefer
wood pellets. And cost? Especially with all the droughts in the corn belt.
Anyone out there know anything about the price fluctuations in corn versus wood?
|
164.224 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Fri Apr 06 1990 10:55 | 1 |
| What's a corn stove?
|
164.225 | One that burns corn as a fuel... | NITMOI::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Fri Apr 06 1990 12:58 | 0 |
164.226 | What do you do with the residual popcorn? | ESCROW::KILGORE | Wild Bill | Fri Apr 06 1990 13:05 | 1 |
|
|
164.227 | eat 'em, it also cuts down on your food bill | BCSE::CRAIG::YANKES | | Fri Apr 06 1990 18:17 | 5 |
|
But seriousely, can we return to the subject at hand? I've seen these
ads and was wondering the same questions about how well they operate.
-c
|
164.228 | What I've learned so far | WAGON::HARRIS | Peggy Harris | Fri Apr 06 1990 19:38 | 53 |
| Well, it looks like, so far, there aren't too many people who have
these things. For those of you who are interested, I'll try to
tell you as much as I have gathered about corn stoves so far...
I've looked at both wood pellet stoves, and corn stoves. They
basically look like a wood/coal stove from the outside. Inside
is a bit different. They have an area where the pellets of wood,
or the kernels of corn burn. Although this area is small, they
are still a good sized unit, since around this area is a venting
system, to insure that the heat is well circulated, and not wasted.
A venting system also works to keep the flow of air going through
the burn area. Ventilation is all done from the outdoors. I think
that there is an inner and outer tube, with the air coming in through
the larger, outside tube, and the warm air returning through the
smaller, inside tube. Although I assume most people would vent this
through their chimney, it is supposed to be safe enough to run through
a clothes-dryer-type vent.
I was told that due to this outside venting system, and the fact
that corn released moisture, the air would not get as dry. I
noticed that the air in the store was pretty nice. Sure beats
what I get with my wood stove!
As far as providing fuel, there is a bin which is above an automatic
feeder. Depending upon the level that you set it at, it will feed
the pellets at some low or high interval. This way, you can keep
the house warm while you are away. Because of the venting systems
and the feeder, I think the fire would go out if there was a loss of
power.
There are several advantages to burning corn. The two that were
most appealing to me were first that it burns MUCH cleaner than
either wood or coal (less pollution). When I looked at the exhaust
on the stove at the store, there was no sign of smoke at all. The
second advantage is the fact that corn grows so quickly and easily.
It can be replenished MUCH faster than both wood or coal. This means
less trees need to be cut down, and less strip mining.
My friend, whose brother has one (in New York), claims that he
spends about the same price per month burning corn, as I spend
on wood.
A place on 101A in Amherst, NH just started selling these last year.
When I first saw the sign, I thought it was some sort of joke. But,
I've been in, and was impressed. I'm just concerned about something
that doesn't have much of a reputation yet. I haven't heard anything
negative, except that storing the corn might be a hassle (they sell
it, or you can buy from any farm supply, like Blue Seal). But then,
buying and stacking wood hasn't been a whole lot of fun, either. The
Corn Stove store had a coupon in one of the papers last week, for $200
off list price. Last time I was there, these ran about $800. So, a
Springtime break of 25% isn't bad.
|
164.229 | Price?? | JUPITR::MENARD | | Mon Apr 09 1990 11:57 | 9 |
| $800??? I looked into these a few months back, and the cost thru the
dealer in NH was $1850 for their smaller model. I'd be interested to
hear which model sells for $800.
Someone asked about the price of corn a few notes back. My local blue
seal dealer sells it for about $11/l00 lbs. From what I heard, the
stove would burn approx. 100/lbs per week.
|
164.230 | How efficient? | AKOV12::ANDREWS | | Mon Apr 09 1990 12:11 | 7 |
| re: .7
$11/week. That's interesting. Do you know how the BTU output
compares to a comparably sized, air-tight box stove burning, say,
seasoned red oak?
Erick
|
164.231 | Price correction | WAGON::HARRIS | Peggy Harris | Thu Apr 12 1990 12:58 | 6 |
| re .7:
YIKES! Sorry about that. I was looking at a wood stove
replacement at the same time, and got the prices mixed up. I
think you are correct... when I looked at them, they were $1800,
not $800. Hope I didn't get your hopes up too high.
|
164.232 | My $.02 | POLAR::MACDONALD | | Mon May 28 1990 13:17 | 31 |
| FWIW, I saw a good demo of a "corn" stove. The principle is relatively
simple, and uses two separate and unrelated air systems.
For combustion, corn is automatically fed into a small burn-pot about
8-9" square, from a hopper filled from the corn source, usually
corn that is purchsed by the bag/bushel. One of the air systems is used
in providing forced air for combustion, and the combustion gases are
vented directly outside via an inner flue; the air feed for this
combustion is drawn from outside via an outer flue which surrounds the
inside one. Sort of a concentric flue arrangement, where cold air is
drawn through the outer flue (and in this way provides for "zero"
clearance to any wall) passed through the burn-pot and out the central
or inside flue. This way also provides for no air to be drawn from
inside the house to support combustion, as happens with most
conventional heating systems, and probably also support the claim of
leaving the moist air in the house.
The second air system uses a blower to circulate the heat generated
from combustion into your living space, as used in some wood or coal
burners.
One glitch is that with "no electricity - no corn burner", and prices are
still high. For those who want to burn corn, you may want to touch
base with local farmers - give them a little more than market price and they
will love you, especially if you don't ask for a receipt. One caution,
most "cattle-corn" is silaged where the whole plant is harvested
including corn/leaves/stock - (wrong stuff)look for those who combine to
get the kernels only.
BTW the waste product of an average burner is a daily chunk of ash that
would fit in an average soup bowl.
|
164.331 | Optimal Location for Heat Source | WAGON::HARRIS | | Fri Sep 14 1990 13:11 | 21 |
| We currently have two wood stoves. One is in the finished basement,
and the other is in the first floor living room. This is our primary
heat, with electric baseboards, for a two-story dormered cape.
Lately, we have been looking into wood pellet stoves, and are about
convinced to replace one of the (old and inefficient) wood stoves
with a pellet burner. Both stoves are on the south side of the house,
and adding something to the north isn't reasonable right now. Still,
the biggest problem is directing the head to the north (cold) side.
The question is this. Which one do we replace? If we replace the
stove in the basement, we've thought of putting vents in the floor,
to try and more evenly heat a larger area. If we replace on the first
floor, we would get more direct heat in the primary living areas.
I'm guessing that once we have the convenience of automatic feeding
with the pellet stove, the remaining wood stove will almost never
get fired up. So, we need to decide where would be the more
efficient location.
Any suggestions?
|
164.332 | | AKOV11::FULTZ | ED FULTZ | Mon Sep 17 1990 13:04 | 12 |
| It would seem to me that if you are not going to use the second stove, then
you would want to replace the living room stove. This would cause the first
floor to be heated along with passing the heat around. The basement stove
will heat the basement first and then pass heat upstairs. To improve the
efficiency of the stove on the first floor, then try putting small fans in
the doorways. This could help circulate the heat. I have heard of homes
with the fans built in above the doorways to aid this. But that would be
more of a major change.
Ed..
|
164.333 | Pipes in the basement ? | ULTRA::SEKURSKI | | Mon Sep 17 1990 13:28 | 17 |
|
Placing the stove in the living area may heat the living space but
what about the water pipes in the basement ?
I've got a 2 year old split with electric baseboard and before
we got a wood stove the temperature in the cellar would drop to
around 32 degrees..... (that's when I bought the stove)
I guess you could pull the insulation off the ceiling in the
basement but the floors would still be pretty cold....
Mike
----
|
164.334 | Open venting for air circulation | WAGON::HARRIS | | Mon Sep 17 1990 17:21 | 16 |
| We put in the order yesterday, for our wood pellet stove. It
won't be delivered for three weeks, so we can still change our
minds on the location. So far, it looks like we've decided to
put it in the living room. If this doesn't work out, we can
always switch it later.
The more we thought about it, the more it seems that a lot of
heat would be wasted getting the basement warm enough to send
sufficient heat up to the rest of the house. If we had venting, or
pulled out the insullation, it may have ended up down there.
Does anyone know the "official" rules on open venting systems?
I understand that the fire marshall isn't too crazy about the
idea of adding open vents between floors and walls, to circulate
the air. But, what about the insurance companies? Is this a
"recommended" limit, or an "official" one?
|
164.204 | Horizontal run for stove piping? | WANDER::BUCK | 3rd Rock from the Sun | Mon Oct 08 1990 15:11 | 15 |
| I have a question that is a bit different than two stoves in one flue. I enter
it here, as it seems as good a place as any.
Can a basement woodstove's stove pipe be run horizontally or at some minimum
pitch for a distance of about 16 feet? What special code, fire, saftey,
precautions are necessary? Special fire/heat proof plaster board? Minimum
clearences? etc.
I'm perfectly willing to take a "No" answer on this one.
thanks,
agb
|
164.239 | cost of stovepipe style chimney | FRAGLE::STUART | I'm in a sandtrap and cant get out | Fri Dec 14 1990 14:21 | 12 |
|
Mr. moderator move this if you know a better place. I checked
all notes with the word chimney but this info was not there.
Has anyone recently put up one of those stovepipe chimneys ?
I see them all around, they're silver pipes, probably
insulated ... I was wondering how much a 25 to 30 foot
one would cost ? How long are they expected to last ?
Any info like $/foot or whatever would be appreciated...
Randy
|
164.240 | About $100 | ODIXIE::RAMSEY | Take this job and Love it! | Wed Dec 19 1990 15:42 | 15 |
| I installed a double wall flue for my furnance about 2 years ago. I
bought 2 8' sections, 2 4' sections, 1 3' section, and a cap for about
$99. It is rated for exterior use but most of mine goes up thru the
center of the house in a utility chase. They only had 2 8' or I would
have bought 3. I bought mine at a wholesaler because I wanted to tie
it into an existing run and the home center did not carry that brand
and the connections were different. The price at the home center was
about the same. This was for 7" or 8" diameter round.
You need to make sure that it sticks up above your roof line. There is
a formula you follow to figure out how much it should extend past your
roof line. It was in the instructions for the cap. If I recall it had
to do with the pitch of the roof. You need to get it up high enough so
that the wind created by the roof does not blow the exhaust back down
the flue.
|
164.241 | Metalbestos chimney pipe | REGENT::BENDEL | | Wed Dec 19 1990 17:00 | 10 |
| What you're probably referring to is Metalbestos (Brand name) chimney
pipe. It is double wall pipe, with an insulation inbetween the walls
(not sure if it's really asbestos or not). It can be installed with
a minimum 2" clearance to combustibles, while the regular double wall
pipe shouldn't be installed closer than 12" (Pretty sure, I don't
positiveley remember the number for this, but I knew when I installed
mine last fall). The Metalbestos is stainless steel, so it is very
expensive. A 3' section lists for $110.00, but some places sell it for
less. The pipes interlock, so they are more secure than ordinary pipe.
Kind of expensive, huh ! Still want one ?
|
164.242 | Can also use stainless liners. | HDLITE::FLEURY | | Wed Dec 19 1990 20:11 | 14 |
| RE: .0
Another option is to use a stainless steel liner within an existing or
new masonary chimney. The piping is somewhat less expensive than the
metalbestos since it is only a single layer of piping. This needs some
insulation though. In my current and last house I used this method and
provided insulation using a mixture of Permalite (brand name) and
portland cement. The cement hardens the Permalite and provides
additional structural support for the liner.
The brand name I used for the liner is Heat-Fab. Send mail if you need
more info about exact cost and distributers.
Dan
|
164.243 | thanks for re-opening this note ! | FRAGLE::STUART | I'm in a sandtrap and cant get out | Thu Dec 20 1990 09:33 | 15 |
|
I want to install a stove in my basement. I'll need about 30' of
pipe to get above the roof line. My other option which I started
and then changed my mind, was to tap into an existing flue, I
know this is discussed in length in other notes so I won't get
into it too much, but, I knocked a hole through the cinder
block and found that it is filled with cement. After further
inspection some of the blocks are filled some aren't, I have
to go almost 3' to get to the lining and there are flat blocks
filling the spaces between the cinder blocks ! Fort Knox or what !!
I'm going to have a mason look at it and give me a price and then
I'll price the pipe from .1 and go with the cheaper/easier one.
Randy
|
164.40 | Which way do I go? | VCSESU::D_SMITH | | Thu Dec 20 1990 13:22 | 22 |
| I've got a few questions that I'm sure someone in note land has experienced.
I also posted this in *::stoves without response.
I would like to optain more heat or a higher efficiency level from my
fireplace. I have no way to control burn rate right now.
Two things come to mind to achieve this. A tube grate/blower combo,
or a wood burner insert.
The other tuff part about this fireplace is it has an arched opening
as apposed to your square or rectangle opening, which makes it very
difficult to find a door/screen cover for it. This fireplace is an
insert with a brick facing, and metal lined flue pipes. It is what
I believe they call a close-contact fireplace.
One benefit is the fresh air inlet for the FHA system is in the same
room (10'x15'), on the upper wall just next to the source of this heat.
If a woodburner was installed, this inlet may help circulate heat
thruout the house, which is a slab ranch by the way.
Any comments or ideas out there?
Much appreciated, Dave'
|
164.41 | you have a zero clearance fireplace | BRANDX::SULLIVAN | none | Thu Dec 20 1990 15:34 | 19 |
| >>This fireplace is an
>>insert with a brick facing, and metal lined flue pipes. It is what
>>I believe they call a close-contact fireplace.
I bet you have a Heat-N-Glow zero clearance unit. They were the only one I
remember seeing with an arch. I saw it at the woodstove shop in Maynard that's
on rte. 20. Sorry, I don't remember the name. If you're looking for a
glass door, and it is the heat-n-glow, they would have it or be able to get it.
Contact Greg Turner at the Woodstove Shop in Littleton (508-486-9500). He
mentioned to me that there are inserts designed for zero clearance units.
However, there probably is not one for your particular design.
You could possible place a woodstove on the hearth and part way into the fire
box. Then you could use the existing flue and air intake and benefit from a
stove's airtight effeciency. You would most likely have to extend your hearth
to get to the minimum required distance (check with your fire department and/or
building inspector). I did this on my downstairs fireplace. It was easy to
extend my hearth because it was used brick and was very easy to match
|
164.244 | Height from surroundings... | SMURF::AMBER | | Fri Dec 21 1990 09:24 | 5 |
| RE .1, I think the rule is the top of the pipe (chimney) must be at
least 2 feet above anything within 10 feet. That's more for fire
protection than maintaining a good draft; in some conditions you need
to be higher.
|
164.245 | metalbestos pipe | ROLL::DOCONNOR | | Wed Jan 02 1991 12:02 | 8 |
| RE. 2 I picked up the Metalbestos brand pipe for $5.00/foot. To install
my wood stove and the pipe needed (2 3ft lengths, 2 2ft lenths and the
sections that goes through the wall (the most expensive peice) cost me
$150.00 dollars, and is garenteed for 15 years.. it was woth it to me.
it was easy to install, and didn't take a lot of time. Your talking
more money to go 30 ft.. Thats what it costed me.
|
164.233 | | LEZAH::QUIRIY | Espresso mornings, lasagna nights | Thu Jan 24 1991 14:11 | 4 |
|
FWIW, they're also selling these at State Lumber in Marlborough.
CQ
|
164.261 | Pseudo woodstoves - gelled alcohol fuel | LEZAH::QUIRIY | Espresso mornings, lasagna nights | Thu Jan 24 1991 14:19 | 12 |
|
Does anyone have any experience with pseudo-wood stoves? I was
browsing through my Sears catalog and saw a couple of different styles
of free standing "stoves" that come complete with pseudo-logs. They
burn something called gelled alcohol ($46.66 for a case of 24 cans...)
The description says these things provide 9000 BTU's per hour.
Are these things purely decorative, a step up from electric logs? Or
can they actually be used to heat a room? A small room? A closet? :-)
I'd get a real wood stove, but I don't think my landlord would go for
it.
Christine
|
164.262 | small or large squeeze. | BTOVT::CACCIA_S | the REAL steve | Thu Jan 24 1991 17:18 | 12 |
|
You can heat two ways with the "gelled alcohol".
1. keep your coffee carrafe warm or
2. HIC>HIC .drink it.
Gelled alcohol is another name for sterno.
|
164.234 | owner operator | TROA01::DHODGSON | | Fri Jan 25 1991 10:49 | 27 |
| I purchased a Dovetech corn stove in Oct 90 and have been using it
since. I would be happy to answer any questions about its operation.
The Canadian price has recently jumped to 2400 $C, I suspect a
marketing ploy with all the unrest in the middle east. My initial
search for an alternate heat source was based on wood, but when I added
the cost of chimney and stove the corn burner was very competetive.
Also, a neighbour who heats entirely with wood says he spends 10 days
cutting, splitting, hauling and piling a seasons worth. I spent 1 hour
getting a wagon load of dry corn from the elevator (150 bu for 400$C)
The note that refers to burning 100 lbs a week is unrealistic if the
stove is to burn 24 hours a day. The minimum idle burns 20 lbs per day
while maximum burn is about 70 lbs per day (1 bu = 56 lbs) I average 10
bu per week. My main heat source is a forced air propane furnace. In
december 89, during a month long cold snap, the price of propane jumped
from 26 cents per liter to 35 cents. A 3 week propane bill of 400$ got
my attention!
I would appreciate information on the current US price of corn stoves
and the BTU size associated. The unit I have is rated at 35000 BTU, but
is under sized for the draughty farm house I'm trying to heat. We still
rely on propane when the outside temperature goes below 0 deg C. I'm
now planning an upgrade or a second unit or more insulation. (the jury
is still out) BTW propane has remained at 35 cents per liter this
season, if it increases again I would like to take advantage of spring
discount sales.
dan
|
164.263 | well, why not? | LEZAH::QUIRIY | Espresso mornings, lasagna nights | Fri Feb 01 1991 17:42 | 5 |
|
Aha. So I guess the consensus is that I could buy one of these and
have a hell of a cheese fondue.
CQ
|
164.264 | Probably not cost effective | FROST::WALZ | Gary Walz | Thu Feb 07 1991 11:58 | 9 |
|
I was intrigued by these a year ago or so. I have a small
"sunroom" (12'x16') that I wanted an occassional heat source
for.
I think the conclusion I came to is that the cost/BTU was
way too high (using Sears' price for the sterno).
-gary
|
164.42 | Woodstove without permit | EPIK::KRISHNA | Boring personal name | Thu Feb 07 1991 16:46 | 17 |
|
Okay, here's a subtle twist in the plot. :-)
We are in the process of buying a home with a woodstove, which is
located in the basement. The stove does not have a permit. I called the
town building inspector about getting a permit, and was told to find a
label on the stove that would detail the conditions that had to be met
before a permit would be granted. I was also told that if the label was
not on the stove, a permit could not be granted. What are the
conditions that this label sets out?
We are considering either asking the owner to obtain a permit for the
stove by closing, or disconnecting the stove and reducing the price of
the home. What should we do?
Thanks for any advice, bc
|
164.43 | Fire Permit is for Insurance Company benefit.. | AHIKER::EARLY | Bob Early T&N EIC /US-EIS | Fri Feb 08 1991 09:24 | 32 |
| re: 210.14 Wood Stoves 14 of 14
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -< Woodstove without permit >-
> We are in the process of buying a home with a woodstove, which is
> located in the basement. The stove does not have a permit. I called the
I can't really say what to do, unless we know what you want to do.
I can tell you this: If you do not have a permit for the Woodstove; it is
your Insurance Company who will determine the "probable" extent of loss
if there is fire due to the woodstove.
Check with your insurance company.
> We are considering either asking the owner to obtain a permit for the
> stove by closing, or disconnecting the stove and reducing the price of
> the home. What should we do?
Make whatever it is that you want to do, as a condition of the sale.
It depends on what is important. I've never heard of having to provide
"the name" of the stove, since the installaitn had to be inspected
by the Fire Marshall. METPAY wants to know about the wood stove, an see
the permit, signed by the Fire Chief. And there is a premium on
the Fire Insurance portion of the Homeowners policy.
This may not apply to you, but when I first began looking at houses, I actually
had a real estate agent tell me that the "Purchase and Sale Agreements" they
used were standard forms which could not be modified. Which, of course, is
a bunch of bunk .. I told them that, and sent them to H*ll.
-Bob
|
164.44 | | SSDEVO::PHERSON | | Fri Feb 08 1991 10:21 | 3 |
| The label on our wood stove specifies the distance that the wood stove must be
located from either combustable or non-combustable wall in a variety of
configurations.
|
164.265 | Wood Pellet Stoves | SUPER::HARRIS | | Thu Aug 22 1991 15:48 | 8 |
| I'm curious how many other people have started using wood
pellet stoves, and where you get your pellets. We bought
one last year, and purchased all of our wood pellets at the
Red House Chimney & Stove Shop in Merrimack, NH (the same
place where we bought the pellet stove).
I'd like to know about alternative places to get pellets,
so I can do some price comparing.
|
164.266 | KP7 or SELECT to add to your notebook | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Thu Aug 22 1991 16:10 | 1 |
| I'd guess the experts flock to PORI::STOVES.
|
164.267 | No other pellet stove users? | SUPER::HARRIS | | Tue Aug 27 1991 13:26 | 4 |
| There doesn't seem to be much activity in the stoves conference,
so I was hoping to find more pellet stove users here. I know
there are a lot of them out there, and was just hoping that the
selection of pellet suppliers would build as well.
|
164.268 | Vermont Castings distributor? | WONDER::BENTO | U know my name, look up the # | Tue Aug 27 1991 13:33 | 4 |
| I just got a Vermont Castings catalog in the mail the other day.
They sell pellet stoves and I think also sold the pellets.
-TB
|
164.72 | Babyproofing woodstove? | CSLALL::TERRIO | | Mon Sep 23 1991 16:19 | 7 |
|
Can anyone offer some suggestions regarding babyproofing our wood
stove? Please don't mention those metal folding gates you can put in
front of them because he knows how to get around it. Any help would
be greatly appreciated.
Rick
|
164.73 | The ONLY way | EMDS::PETERSON | | Mon Sep 23 1991 17:41 | 5 |
|
Don't put a fire in it.
|
164.74 | experience will keep them away.... | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | So many interests, so little time/$$$! | Tue Sep 24 1991 09:36 | 18 |
| This may sound cruel and heartless, but most kids will, one way or
another, get near a woodstove that is hot, even if they have to use
boltcutters and ladders to manage it. They find the inaccessibility very
attractive, until they get burned. I'm not suggesting that you allow
your child to get burned, but that you try and help your child understand
just how hot the stove is and that they will be hurt if they touch it. Both
my kids learned easily that the stove was something to stay away from, and
never had an accident with it. Others may not be so lucky but you will
always be trying to remember to "fix" the stove, and it will be a pain to
do. Experiance is the best teacher, and your kids will learn faster from a
hot stove than all the safeguards you can put around them.
Be sure play areas are 5-6' away from the stove, that it isn't in a
traffic path to-from the TV or other area they frequent, and they should
have no reason to be near it once they realise that it will burn them.
Vic H
|
164.75 | If too old for gates, old enough to learn | KAYAK::GROSSO | Prevent & Prepare or Repent & Repair | Tue Sep 24 1991 10:24 | 4 |
| It's a brave man who'll offer another advice regarding their children, but
I'll second Vic's reply. It worked just fine for my two little ones. You
just hover watchfully until they've learned, to ensure they don't learn by
falling against it (and aren't able to get off, then they will be hurt).
|
164.76 | | VMSSG::NICHOLS | It ain't easy being green | Tue Sep 24 1991 10:41 | 7 |
| Kids will learn from experience, but the experience could be very
painful!
If I were you, I would ask our pediatrician the minimum age when a
woodstove is child-safe.
herb
|
164.77 | | KOALA::DIAMOND | No brag, Just fact. | Tue Sep 24 1991 10:48 | 7 |
|
re Last few
It worked for my cats. I had a cat that use to sleep on the stove
(during the summer 8*)). Now it won't go near the damn thing.
Mike
|
164.78 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome (Maynard) | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:01 | 18 |
| I'll nth the idea that the kid, if mobile enough to defeat a
fence/gate, probably has enough smarts to figure out what
"hot" means if you take about two minutes and show/explain
what a hot woodstove is. My mother was one of 13 kids; she
and all her brothers and sisters and countless hordes of
random childern, cousins, grandchildren, etc. all grew up on
a farm in close proximity to a "Queen Atlantic" kitchen range
as well as stoves in the living room, etc. and didn't have any
problem. This past summer we stayed in a camp in Maine for
about a week that had a woodstove, and my two-year-old had no
trouble learning that the stove was something to keep a distance
from.
As previously pointed out, you *do* have to take reasonable
precautions to be sure the child isn't likely to fall against
the stove by accident.
And all kids are different; you may have one that is just inherently
less cautious than most.
|
164.79 | Sometimes it's OK to let kids get hurt | EVMS::PAULKM::WEISS | Trade freedom for security-lose both | Tue Sep 24 1991 12:22 | 43 |
| You can do your best to make them understand that it's hot and they should stay
away, and some kids will still try to touch it, or forget that they shouldn't
touch it, when you're not standing right next to them. What you can do with the
screens it ensure, as someone else said, that they don't fall into it, which
could put them in a position where they couldn't get away and they could get
really hurt.
My son, despite warnings and previous disciplinary action, touched the hot stove
one day and burned his finger. Of course he pulled his finger off immediately,
and just burned the tip. The burn healed fine, and he learned two things:
stoves really ARE hot, and mom and dad (at least sometimes) know what they are
talking about when they warn him about something. In a way, I was actually
glad when he did it (cruel and heartless though it may sound), because he
learned in a much more lasting way than he ever could from me telling him that
stoves are hot and to be stayed away from, and he did it in a way that caused
no lasting damage.
To allay that feeling that I'm cruel and heartless, note that I've been glad
that I clipped the corner of MY OWN thumb with the tablesaw. It caused no
lasting damage except a scar and a bit of numbness in one small area, and it
brought home to me in a way no literature ever could how dangerous saws are, how
fast accidents happen, and how bad it is to do stupid things without thinking.
Now every time I turn on a power tool I rub that numb place and ask myself: "Is
what I'm about to do dangerous?" More than once the answer has been yes, and
I've figured out a safer way to make the cut I wanted. That little clip on the
thumb may save some of my fingers someday.
The bottom line is, do your best to make sure that your kids aren't REALLY hurt,
and then don't be afraid of their getting hurt just enough to learn. Such
lessons can be a BENEFIT to your children. Who knows when you might go
somewhere where there is a hot stove with no screen, and their experiential
knowledge of the pain of hot stoves might save them from greater injury?
For example, no matter how much we tell him, my son (now almost 6) is
essentially fearless of cars. He knows to look for cars, but he's been known to
"forget" far too often. The day isn't far off when he will be out riding his
bike on busier streets, and I fear for his safety. If I could arrange for him
to have a frightening and even perhaps painful encounter with a car that did no
serious or lasting damage, I'd do it. I'd rather have him get a scrape that
takes a couple weeks to heal and have him really learn of the dangers of cars,
than have him stay oblivious to the danger and really get himself hurt.
Paul
|
164.80 | | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Presto! Wrong hat. | Tue Sep 24 1991 13:51 | 10 |
|
I agree with the last few replies. Although I have no kids, I was one
once, and I still remember learning my lesson! I was fascinated with
fire and we had an incinerator in the basement. I don't remember what
I was doing but one day, I went to lift the door open and burnt the
palm of my hand bad enough to teach me never to touch that darn thing
again. It hurt like hell for quite a while and a big blister formed
there.
CQ
|
164.81 | | PROXY::HOPKINS | Volunteer of the month | Tue Sep 24 1991 16:04 | 4 |
| The woman who used to sit for my kids put up some of that wrought iron
railing around her wood stove. The kids couldn't/wouldn't climb over
it but she and her husband could climb over to feed the stove.
|
164.82 | Some of the messages get through | CARLIN::SULLIVAN | We have met the enemy, and they is us! | Fri Sep 27 1991 14:22 | 31 |
|
I will be echoing others here, but if it helps...
I have a 3.5 year old and one who is 1.5 years. We run the woodstove
all winter. It IS out of the traffic patterns, on a raised hearth, however
there are no other barriers. They play around it all summer, but seem to
know to stay away when it is lit. Unless it is dying out, the heat given off
can become painful before they even reach touching distance. I asked the
store owner where I bought my stove the same question. His answer was
the same and has been borne out by my experience.
I have had similar experiences to some of the others (Paul
especially!). My daughter mildly burnt her hand on an iron despite repeated
warnings about it being hot. She hasn't gone near it, or the stove, since. :-)
Mark
P.S. Paul, I too nicked my finger on a table saw with similar results.
Certainly changed my approach to using my power tools. I do hope
you don't have your son learn to respect cars the way I did.
Kelly, the 3.5 year old daughter, took my truck for a ride down
the driveway two weeks ago (she released the emergency brake and
pulled the stick shift into neutral). The estimate is $1500.00 :-(
She certainly has a greater respect for the power of cars now!
The good/funny part of the story is... As I was dashing toward the
truck, my biggest worry was that she was going to fall out of
the open door. Then I noticed that before initiating all this
destruction, she first put her seatbelt on. At least some
of the messages get through! :-)
|
164.83 | .....no suitable title. | TFH::DONNELLY | Take my advice- Don't listen to me | Sat Sep 28 1991 00:45 | 16 |
| >To allay that feeling that I'm cruel and heartless, note that I've been glad
>that I clipped the corner of MY OWN thumb with the tablesaw. It caused no
>lasting damage except a scar and a bit of numbness in one small area, and it
>brought home to me in a way no literature ever could how dangerous saws are,
>how fast accidents happen, and how bad it is to do stupid things without
>thinking. Now every time I turn on a power tool I rub that numb place and ask
>myself: "Is what I'm about to do dangerous?" More than once the answer has
>been yes, and I've figured out a safer way to make the cut I wanted.
>That
>little clip on the thumb may save some of my fingers someday.
i think you should immediately take those fingers off with the saw. you may
be saving an ARM! :^o
-craig
|
164.84 | Thanks! | CSLALL::TERRIO | | Tue Oct 01 1991 11:47 | 6 |
|
Thanks to everyone who answered. I pretty much saw this weekend what
we can expect to happen. We had a fire in the woodstove on Sunday and
whenever he got to within 2 or 3 feet he would start crying because of
the heat. So hopefully this should keep him away from it.
|
164.269 | Where to buy??? | NAVIER::SSULLIVAN | | Tue Dec 17 1991 10:00 | 13 |
|
Where to get pellets? The STOVE Shop in Salem has large
quantities of pellets, and a nice selection of the Stoves.
I just purchased a small soapstone wood stove(wife thought
it was adorable), I liked the look and feel of the pellet
stoves, real easy to use and not much mess.
The Stove Shop is located at exit 3 on rte93, the intersection
of rte 111 and rte28, actualy it is on rte 28. This is about
1 1/2 miles east of 93.
Scott
|
164.270 | Concord, MA | LEDDEV::DEMBA | | Tue Dec 24 1991 09:45 | 9 |
| <<< Note 4347.4 by NAVIER::SSULLIVAN >>>
-< Where to buy??? >-
I know of someone in Concord, Ma who just bought the machinery to
make them. I don't know if he has set up shop yet, but if anyone
is interested I will give him a call.
Steve
|
164.271 | Cost of a Pellet Stove? | ESCROW::ROBERTS | | Tue Sep 29 1992 10:11 | 5 |
| I just saw a newspaper article about these stoves, and they sound like
just what I want to heat a small workshop. How expensive are they to
buy?
|
164.272 | | SMAUG::FLOWERS | IBM Interconnect Eng. | Tue Sep 29 1992 15:14 | 13 |
| > I just saw a newspaper article about these stoves, and they sound like
> just what I want to heat a small workshop. How expensive are they to
> buy?
I don't have an answer to your question. But there's a "wood stove" store
in Littleton, Ma (just down rt 119 from Little Common and 495). I stopped
in one day to look as gas grills and the friend I was with talked to him
about the pellet stoves. He had about 5 or 6 to show... He was sold on them.
The one thing I do remember was something about they sold the pellets in
one ton quantities and hence took up a decent amount or room to store them.
Dan
|
164.273 | | MR4DEC::BMCWILLIAMS | Improvise if you have to ... | Tue Sep 29 1992 22:39 | 6 |
| Most good-quality, free-standing pellet stoves start around $1,800. Fireplace
inserts run a couple hundred dollars more. Pellets run somewhere around $190
per ton. These puppies are not cheap, but they're much less labor-intensive
than wood "stick" burning stoves, more efficient, and less polluting.
Brian
|
164.274 | How's it compare energy-wise? | VIA::SUNG | Live Free or Live in MA | Tue Sep 29 1992 23:52 | 5 |
| So how many BTUs per unit of wood pellets?
How does that compare with wood, gas, oil, and electric?
-al
|
164.275 | Aren't pellet stoves Electric? | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Wed Sep 30 1992 08:49 | 4 |
| These stoves are intriguing, but I have a question?
Is the pellet feeder electric? If so, doesn't this mean your fire will go out
when the power goes off? Or is it battery operated? Or windup?
|
164.276 | | MR4DEC::BMCWILLIAMS | Improvise if you have to ... | Thu Oct 01 1992 15:12 | 17 |
| I've seen stats that put these stoves at 89% efficiency (that's why
they can get away with a 4" noninsulated flue and produce so little ash). I
think the best stick stoves, e.g. VC Defiant Encore 0028, get around 80%
efficiency max.
I've also seen stats that say one ton of pellets produces the same heating
ability as 1.5 cords of wood, 170 therms of natural gas, and 200 gallons of
propane, and 123 gallons of #6 oil.
The burn time on a pellet stove tends to be much longer than a stick stove.
Some are rated at 15 to 28 hours on a load of pellets (55 pounds).
Every pellet stove I have seen uses electricity to run the augur and fans. They
tend to use 110V and draw anywhere from 150 to 550 watts. So, if the
electricity goes out, your pellet fire will soon burn out.
Brian
|
164.277 | Doesn't sound economical | RAB::SUNG | Live Free or Live in MA | Thu Oct 01 1992 16:25 | 9 |
| If the heating comparison numbers in .11 are correct, then if one
ton of wood pellets ($190) is the same as 123 gallons of fuel oil
[did you mean #2 oil?] that means the oil would have to be $1.544
per gallon for them to be equivalent.
At the current price of oil, the wood pellet stove doesn't sound
very economical.
-al
|
164.45 | naive questions but here they are... | APLVEW::DEBRIAE | It's apple picking season! | Mon Oct 05 1992 16:11 | 25 |
|
This is the first time I've had a woodstove (it came with the
house) and I've been experimenting with it. It seems you can burn
anything in there when you get the coals hot enough. To my surprise
even wet half-rotten logs which were apparently left laying on the
ground for years burned to coals.
So my naive questions are:
1) Why do you have to dry the wood? (only little more efficient?)
2) Do you have to split the wood like for a fireplace or can you
just throw in whole logs and the contained heat will burn it?
3) The only problem with burning slightly 'green' wood is that it
takes longer to burn and some people don't like the hissing
noises, but otherwise it's no big deal, right?
It takes so much effort to split and dry wood, people have to be
doing it for a reason. But I'm surprised how much a wood stove can
burn (compared to the fireplaces I'm used to). It seems to dry the
wood in the contained heat while the rest is burning...
-Erik
|
164.46 | some fast answers to burning questions | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | Life is a Do_It_Yourself project! | Mon Oct 05 1992 17:31 | 36 |
| > So my naive questions are:
> 1) Why do you have to dry the wood? (only little more efficient?)
Dry wood, when burning, creates less creosote than does green wood.
Creosote coats your chimney and can lead to chimney fires and more effort
at cleaning the chimney each year. Left uncleaned, the creosote will nearly
block the flue off in your chimney after some period of time.
> 2) Do you have to split the wood like for a fireplace or can you
> just throw in whole logs and the contained heat will burn it?
Once you get a fire going very hot, you can add logs that are up to
about 5"-6" in diameter. Otherwise, they burn better if split. You can
hardly start a fire with whole, round logs of any size, other than perhaps
twigs.
> 3) The only problem with burning slightly 'green' wood is that it
> takes longer to burn and some people don't like the hissing
> noises, but otherwise it's no big deal, right?
The hissing is water being vaporized and going up the chimney in steam.
You lose _LOTS_ of your heat in a fireplace by having to dry the wood in
the fire before it burns. This also reduces you effective temperature in
the stove so your fire burns cooler, also a problem since you want a hot
fire to keep your flue clean of creosote and you want to get good
combustion in the fire so you have less pollutants in the smoke that comes
out of the chimney.
If you are new to this, try your library for a good book on stoves and
burning, or look for the woodstove notesfile. There used to be an active
one a few years back when more folks were burning wood and less oil/gas.
Vic
|
164.47 | Woodstove Conference PORI::STOVES | MSHRMS::BRIGHTMAN | IPMC4U - PMC 88,89,90,91,92 ... | Tue Oct 06 1992 09:21 | 0 |
164.48 | | VERGA::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome PKO3-1/D30 | Tue Oct 06 1992 10:46 | 15 |
| You want a hot, clean fire. The easiest way to get this is with
split, dry wood. It's almost impossible to achieve with wet,
unsplit logs.
As mentioned, if you have a smouldering, steamy fire you'll get
more creosote in the chimney, which can lead to chimney fires
and burning your house down. Also as mentioned, it takes a *lot*
of energy to evaporate all that water, so you get less heat.
If you're new at this, I'd suggest getting one of those magnetic
thermometers that goes on the stovepipe, and aim to keep the
temperature up around 300+ degrees. You don't want the water
vapor in the smoke to condense inside the chimney. Also take
a look at what's coming out of the chimney when the stove is
burning; except when starting up, you should (ideally) see
little, if any, smoke.
|
164.49 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Tue Oct 06 1992 11:39 | 15 |
| Re: Green Wood
Popular Science had an article on creosote/wood about 10 years ago.
The conclusion was that the amount of cresosote was INDEPENDENT
of dry or green wood. Their reasoning was that the chemical reaction
for burning wood produced enough water to make cresosote from dry
wood.
The main point is temperature of the smoke pipe. Cold, and you
will get cresote from dry wood.
The new wood stoves use converters or new burning designs to eliminate
cresote production.
Marc H.
|
164.50 | Get a Cat... | ESKIMO::CASSIDY | Aspiring conservationist | Wed Oct 07 1992 02:03 | 17 |
|
Speaking about creosote build up, you should check your
chimney before you continue to run the wood stove. On a bright,
sunny day you can hold a mirror inside the clean out at the base.
Angle the mirror so you can check out all four walls of the
chimney lining from top to bottom. If it looks like you have
rocks growing along the inside of the flue, you probably need a
sweep done.
The WOODSTOVES conference is very good. I recommend you
look up notes on catalytic combustors. A properly fired CC will
burn up to 90% of the creosote coming from your stove and will
reduce the air pollution (considerably) as well. They allow you
to run the stove cooler (SAFELY!) and longer. If you heat with
mostly wood, you can recover the cost of a catalytic combustor
in one or two seasons (depending how much you pay for the wood).
Tim
|
164.278 | Wood Stove Permit??? | ASABET::POMEROY | Puppy Power... | Tue Nov 10 1992 12:21 | 14 |
| Hi all,
I am in the process of getting ready to purchase a wood stove. My
question about this is, Do I need to get a permit (in Messedupchusetts)
before I install it or do I install it first then get th permit? Also
who do I contact about the permit? I heard it was the town building
inspector and I heard the Chief of the fire department...My last
question is ..Do I need to submit anything to my insurance company
(which is Metropolitan)??? Thanks in advance for any help you folks
can give me. I just want to make sure I have all my bases covered.
Thanks,
Kevin
|
164.279 | permit needed | ISLNDS::CARLBERG | | Tue Nov 10 1992 13:37 | 4 |
| Yes you do need a permit in Mass.(of course they charge) The building
inspector will also tell you what you need for behind and under the
stove and any other requirements. I believe the fire cheif will have to
inspect you chimmney.
|
164.280 | ALso needs a UL label | AWECIM::MCMAHON | Code so clean you can eat off it! | Tue Nov 10 1992 14:29 | 9 |
| Yup, and the stove must have a UL label attached to the stove. When we
moved in last September, there was already a woodstove there but Homer
Owner didn't install the pipes correctly and it hadn't been inspected.
We called the building inspector and he wouldn't even look at it
because the stove didn't have a UL label physically attached to the
stove, even though the owner's manual had the UL label. The stove was
made in 1977 and it wasn't required that the UL seal be affixed back in
those days and of course the manufacturer isn't in business anymore so
we couldn't get one.
|
164.281 | Thanks All!! | ASABET::POMEROY | Puppy Power... | Wed Nov 11 1992 07:04 | 12 |
| I already have the brick laid on the floor and the chimney is just
about set. All I have to do is finish up on it where the previous
owner left off. He extended the back wall about 3-4 inches so it was
neccessary for him to put up another layer of brick from floor to
ceiling. He did a half-arsed job of it. The stove I am getting is
about 5-6 years old...Hopefully it will have the UL label on it..Boy
I hate this state, they tax you to death, charge you for everything
under the sun and then vote themselves in raises??? Where do I get a
job like that. Thanks for all the input. I wil do some calling today
to get the ball-of-wax rolling.
Kevin
|
164.282 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 11 1992 07:48 | 6 |
| RE: .3
You have just seen the tip of the icebreg of rules and regulations
in the people's republic of taxachusetts.
Marc H.
|
164.283 | Stop whining... | RANGER::PESENTI | Only messages can be dragged | Thu Nov 12 1992 09:45 | 19 |
| Pardon my soapbox, but more to blame than the bureaucrats are the moron do it
yourselfers who consistently get things wrong, then expect the rest of the
world to pay for their stupidity (we pay the fire dept, we pay the insurance,
etc.)
If you could have seen the woodstove (without permit) the prior owner of my
house tried to sell me. I had to extend the hearth to use a stove that was
about 1/4 the size of the one he had. The ash lip under the front door of his
stove hung OVER the rug!!!
I won't even get into the details about the finish work on the master bedroom,
the plumbing and the wiring he did. None of it would pass a permit. Most of
it looked fine when we bought the house, but now, 8 years later, it's all
starting to show.
So, if you are going to complain, complain about the PROBLEM, not the solution.
If you think the solution is imperfect, or ineffective, spend all your spare
time getting involved in your local politics. And hire a qualified tradesman
to make all your home improvements! Or... MOVE.
|
164.284 | Get The Book | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Nov 12 1992 10:53 | 9 |
| RE: .5
Massachusetts State Bookstore offers a publication outlining all the
rules and regulations you have to do for the Woodstove installation.
I don't have the number, but they are located in the basement of the
State House.
Marc H.
|
164.285 | Any recommendations/referrals for installers? | LANDO::PATTON | | Thu Nov 12 1992 13:32 | 11 |
| I'll be putting in two wood stoves (in fireplaces).
Can anyone recommend a shop, chimney person, or woodstove installer
who is willing to install __USED__ stoves?
I've been given the reference of "The Chimney Doctor" but cannot
locate them. Other places I've called will only install their
own new stoves, not used ones.
Any suggestions? They shouldn't be major installs...
Thanks. jill patton
|
164.286 | | TNPUBS::MACKONIS | We are a compromise of nature! | Thu Nov 12 1992 15:54 | 7 |
| Jill,
Several of the Chimney Sweeps that I have used over the years buy/sell used
stoves and also do installlations. I am in NH, so my recommendations might
not come down your way.
dana
|
164.19 | Some information on after-market catalytic convertor usage | HDLITE::NEWMAN | Chuck Newman, 297-5499, MRO4-1/H16, Pole J13 | Wed Nov 25 1992 10:22 | 15 |
| FWIW, I just talked to Nancy Fish at Corning (800/637-1644) who deals with
catalytic convertors. I was specifically interested in an after-market unit.
She said that they need to operate with the pipe in a vertical orientation, and
therefore work best on units whose exhaust comes out the top.
For rear exhaust units, she said that the elbow needed to get the pipe vertical
will cause enough of a temperature loss that the catalytic convertor won't work
well. Of course, you can really fire up the wood stove to get the catalytic
convertor hot enough, but that introduces more inefficiencies than you gain.
Also, I was planning on using it on a wood furnace, and she said the cycling on
a furnace isn't good -- what is really needed is constant operation.
-- Chuck Newman
|
164.287 | does permit need to be renewed annually? | CALS::HEALEY | DTN 297-2426 | Mon Nov 30 1992 11:55 | 10 |
|
My husband and I recently purchased a house with two woodstoves in
it. I don't know if there was a permit. Do we need to get one
ourselves even if the previous owners had one? Does a permit last
one year or must it be renewed every year.
I didn't even know about getting a permit until I saw this note!
We've been living there since April!
Karen
|
164.288 | METPAY does have a form | MILPND::STUART | | Mon Nov 30 1992 12:02 | 11 |
|
To answer the question about METPAY .... They do have a form that
you fill out on the brand, type, size etc.. of the stove and you
have the inspector sign it and give a copy to METPAY. Not every
Rep will know what you're talking about, one had to call the main
office to see if the form existed. The only reason I pushed him
to find out was because I had gotten the form before and wanted
to cover my butt.
Randy
|
164.289 | Guess I've Been Lucky | MSBCS::BLUNDELL | | Mon Nov 30 1992 12:07 | 16 |
|
I bought my home three years ago and it came complete with woodstove
and without UL sticker, hearth under entire stove area, or permit.
I never filled out a form with METPAY or had it inspected by a
building inspector -- (the fire chief did inspect the house for
smoke detectors and couldn't have missed the stove if he were
breathing/awake) and METPAY has paid me for two losses related
to the woodstove (one where the flashing lifted and water
leaked all down the chimney on carpets, etc. and one chimney
fire caused by a dead squirrel in a clean chimney rather than
an un-cleaned chimney)
Sounds from this topic however, that I've simply been lucky . . .
Sigh . . .
|
164.290 | building inpector can probably help you | SENIOR::HAMBURGER | Life is a Do_It_Yourself project! | Mon Nov 30 1992 16:48 | 13 |
|
Woodstove permits are a one shot deal....the inspection is looking for
(and don't quote me on details, it has been a few years) both the type of
stove and proper installation of it, including 2' minimum distance to
combustible surfaces on the sides, 18" in front, and maybe 2' above the
stove.
If you are unsure about the installation, check with your local
building inspector for any info he might have or can point you to. I recall
a sheet that our town handed out that gave you all the details necessary to
get a permit signed off.
Vic
|
164.155 | Anyone ever done this???? | LANDO::CLEMENCE | | Wed Dec 02 1992 12:46 | 30 |
|
I got a question that relates to installations. I'm considering,
mainly due to cost and verification of it working, of installing a woodstove
boiler located outside of my house. I'm planning to use it to suppliment pool
water heating when we get several cloudy days. I have also resolved the pipes
freezing issue, it will use an antifreeze mixture in the pipes.
A rough drawing of what I'm thinking:
^
/ \ o
/ \ o
/ \ |
| | <- House _| <- Chimney
| |..................| |<- Woodstove boiler
------- <-- 10-20 ft --> --
I am curious if anyone has ever done this before?
Can anyone think of a legal reason why I can't do this?
I do plan to talk to the local Building Inspector too.
Thanks
Bill
|
164.156 | Works quite well too. | WFOV12::KOEHLER | Personal_Name | Wed Dec 02 1992 14:08 | 6 |
| Bill,
My brother heats his home down in N.C. with a wood fired boiler that is
outside by his garage. It not a closed system, it used water..but he
doesn't have a real bad freezing problem.
Jim
|
164.291 | Wood Stove Vent Hood | GNPIKE::MIKELIS | Construction means Destruction | Tue Jan 05 1993 17:18 | 23 |
| I am looking to have a wood stove vent hood built for my wood stove
to direct the heat through the floor to the room above. Roughly it will
be about 2'x3'x 2' and attached to the ceiling. It will look something like:
-+-------+-
| |
| |<---- square shaped
| |
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
| |
+-------------+
My question is what gauge sheet metal should i use and what price can i
expect to pay. Does anyone have any recommendations for sheet metal
fabricators in the Central Ma. area? There are about 40 listed in the
phone book.
Thanks.
/james
|
164.292 | I used J&R Sheet Metal | HDLITE::NEWMAN | Chuck Newman, 297-5499, MRO4-1/H16, Pole J13 | Tue Jan 05 1993 17:30 | 8 |
| I used J&R Sheet Metal last month when I had my wood furnace hooked up to my
existing gas FHA system. The price seemed pretty good, as did the finished
quality. Marc Hildebrandt (sp?) said he also used them for some work, and I
believe he too had a favorable experience.
The are out of Worcester, I believe.
-- Chuck Newman
|
164.293 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Jan 06 1993 08:14 | 5 |
| RE: .1
Correct! Use J&R
Marc Hildebrant
|
164.294 | | GNPIKE::MIKELIS | Construction means Destruction | Wed Jan 06 1993 08:56 | 5 |
| Thanks, i'll give them a shot.
BTW, what is the guage of standard heat duct? I am thinking 18 or 22 ga.
/james
|
164.127 | Easy way to clean the glass ??? | 40101::DODIER | Food for thought makes me hungry | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:36 | 6 |
| Does anyone have any tips on cleaning the glass on air-tight wood
stoves that have a glass panel in the door ? While I'm at it, if
someone knows of an easy way to clean the glass on a the lid of a gas
grill I'd appreciate that as well.
Ray
|
164.128 | | 6602::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:39 | 6 |
| �While I'm at it, if
� someone knows of an easy way to clean the glass on a the lid of a gas
� grill I'd appreciate that as well.
I don't know if it works, but I've seen a cleaner for just that
application advertised.
|
164.129 | | 3149::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Tue Sep 07 1993 14:57 | 2 |
| Oven cleaner
|
164.130 | | 6308::FLEECE::RITCHIE | Elaine Kokernak Ritchie | Tue Sep 07 1993 15:09 | 2 |
| My husband uses lacquer thinner, his favorite all-around cleaning solution.
It doesn't get it looking like new, but at least you can see through it...
|
164.131 | Use water on the woodstove doors | 32370::SWONGER | Rdb Software Quality Engineering | Tue Sep 07 1993 16:38 | 8 |
| My woodstove isntructions say *NOT* to use anything other than water
to clean the windows.
In fact, I've found that warm water and a sponge work remarkably
well on my wood stove doors. Just takes a little patience and elbow
grease, but it's not an all-day back breaker by any means.
Roy
|
164.132 | Like it was paint... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Wed Sep 08 1993 04:07 | 4 |
|
I used a razor blade to clean the glass on my gas grill.
Tim
|
164.133 | For my Russo fireview, | MPGS::MASSICOTTE | | Wed Sep 08 1993 08:23 | 9 |
|
Last year I picked up a spray can of stuff for that purpose
at the stove shop in Auburn, Ma. and it works excellent.
If I think of it tonite I'll look at it and post it tomorrow.
Believe it has a red or orange and black label.
Fred
|
164.134 | | TLE::PIC9::allen | Christopher Allen, DEC COBOL, ZKO 381-0864 | Wed Sep 08 1993 10:10 | 4 |
| While the stove is still warm, use a piece of damp newspaper to pick up some of
the ashes and use this to scour the glass.
-Chris
|
164.135 | Not as bad as it looked | VICKI::DODIER | Food for thought makes me hungry | Wed Sep 08 1993 10:30 | 7 |
| Well, I was sitting there in my living room looking at it last
night and figured I try some regular old Windex. I guess the stuff
wasn't as baked on as it looked because it came right off using the
Windex and paper towels. I suspect that I won't be as lucky with my gas
grill though.
Ray
|
164.295 | need opinions on pellet stoves | CALS::MUDGETT | | Thu Sep 09 1993 11:00 | 11 |
| We're planning to buy a small pellet stove, to replace a Godin
coal stove. By small I mean small in BTU output and in footprint
- need to keep the depth of the stove under 25" if back
venting and the less depth the better. We're considering the
Jamestown Baby Bear, Whitfield Renaissance and Quest.
Opinions on stoves and dealers are welcome. We live in Bolton,
dealers in Mass or southern NH are those we've been visiting.
Thanks
|
164.296 | 2cworth | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Thu Sep 09 1993 12:42 | 14 |
|
Let me ask you this..... Is it just size your worried about?
Some +'s. Its clean, meaning you dont have coal dust and related
items and stuff.
Its self loading. Just fill the hopper and go.
Some -'s The fuel is $$$$. and I venture to say it wont put out
like your coal unit will..
But I take it this wont be used for heating the house and not on
all the time, so for you, it might work out good.
JD
|
164.297 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Thu Sep 09 1993 13:26 | 8 |
|
Silly John, the stove should put out at least as much as its rated
for. Of course, size for size, it may put out less than coal, but I
don't know that. I do know that pellet stoves are getting raves from
everyone who gets the chance to use them. The price of the pellets is
coming down, but it still is more than coal or wood.
Kenny
|
164.298 | | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Thu Sep 09 1993 13:33 | 6 |
| Have you considered a corn stove, which is quite similar and possibly more
economical? (Or, possibly not.)
I ask only because they usually seem to be under consideration simultaneously.
-Jack
|
164.299 | PORI::STOVES | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Fri Sep 10 1993 01:35 | 4 |
| You might try asking/lookng around PORI::STOVES.
Tim
|
164.136 | razor blades | SALEM::LAYTON | | Fri Sep 10 1993 11:52 | 2 |
| ...ditto the razor blade on the gas grill. Takes about 5 minutes for a
big window.
|
164.300 | some more background..... | CALS::MUDGETT | | Fri Sep 10 1993 16:49 | 19 |
| thanks for the pointer to pori::stoves.
I was looking for opinions on particular makes of stoves - who has
used the different models and can offer advice. This stove will act
as a supplemental heater for 2 rooms that are at the outer reaches
of our forced hot-air oil heating system. (Very old house with
add-ons). The coal stove is messy and inconvenient, especially since we
don't run it all day when we're at work - the coal burns out into
chunks that have to be lifted out the top, ash has to be removed, then
re-light the fire etc etc. A real pain. It also sometimes
overpowers the room when it is really cranked. Coal dust is also
real dirty. Cost of fuel is really not the primary factor, although
I imagine it will still be far cheaper than cranking up the oil
furnace enough to warm up those rooms.
The size restrictions are based on the location of the chimney put in
by the former owner, proximity of walls, and how much traffic flow
is needed near that spot.
|
164.301 | other tack... | JURAN::GARDNER | justme....jacqui | Fri Sep 10 1993 17:19 | 9 |
|
What about a gas log stove? Jotel makes good ones. You could
hook up to a natural gas tank if you don't have piped in gas.
They are easy on and easy off. They also don't create a mess.
Heat well and give a realistic appearance of a fire place with
the lights out for those romantic times.
justme....jacqui
|
164.302 | tried anthracite? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Mon Sep 13 1993 11:56 | 9 |
|
I used to have an antique style Godin stove with a fairly small firebox
and burned anthracite or coked coal. It's very clean - virtually
dustless and burns extremely hot (low soot/ash too). With the air
intake shut it would stay lit for 24 hrs. Is this kind of fuel
available to you?
Colin
|
164.303 | where is "stoves" notes file? | CALS::MUDGETT | | Tue Sep 14 1993 13:31 | 5 |
| I've tried to get into pori::stoves and krystl::stoves for two
weeks...they have either disappeared or been down for a long time. Does
anyone know?
Chris
|
164.304 | Maybe next week... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Thu Sep 16 1993 02:46 | 7 |
|
PORI::STOVES is not currently reachable. It `was' reachable
three weeeks ago (Really it was). I never saw any notes about
it moving or anything. Maybe the moderator is on vacation.
Tim
|
164.305 | more for consideration | SPHERE::DUNTON | Frankly my dear..... | Fri Sep 17 1993 11:02 | 12 |
|
Something else to consider with a pellet stove (whether it's a +
or a - will vary with area).
If your electricity goes out, about 20 minutes (or so) later the
fire goes out - we lost power for 3 days during hurricane Bob.
Agreed, hurricanes and the such don't happen that often, and we
were probably not the norm with the electric out for 3 days...
but it does happen. With electric out... we had heat from wood
stove only; not the warmest it's been in the house, but 55 - 60
degrees kept the pipes from freezing.
|
164.306 | You mean we have to plug in the stove too??? | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Fri Sep 17 1993 11:57 | 8 |
| Are pellet stoves electric? Or is it just that there are parts that
need to be electric, like a hopper feeder or a blower? I've been
thinking about these stoves for basement heating, and the case
where electricity goes out. I already lose my water (well pump) and
heat. If a pellet stove isn't going to work either, that's something
I need to know.
PeterT
|
164.307 | no rose colored glasses here | SPHERE::DUNTON | Frankly my dear..... | Fri Sep 17 1993 12:12 | 18 |
|
the stove itself isn't electric, but the blower is.
However, the stove needs air to burn and the air is
fed in by the blower. No electricity, no blower,
and in about 20 minutes after blower stops, no air
for fire, hence fire goes out.
I suggest you ask your dealer to explain it in detail
if needed.
In the limited knowledge I have, I see pellet stoves
as a BMW (big money waste). They cost more than a
comparable wood stove, they cost more to operate (pellets
are some $100/ton, where a ton *might* last about 3
months plus the extra $10 or so per month for electric).
The wood stove is a little more work and maybe not
quite as clean, but probably cheaper in the long run.
|
164.308 | What do they cost? | QPC1::HERCHEK | | Fri Sep 17 1993 13:18 | 4 |
| Where's the best place to look/buy a pelet stove? What is the price
range for such a stove?
Thanks
|
164.309 | | SALEM::DIFRUSCIA | | Sun Sep 19 1993 07:37 | 7 |
| re:1
I don't know where you are located but, in Salem N.H., off of
Rte. 28. there is a place called the Stove Shop they have them
there.
|
164.310 | It's hard to split corn... | STRATA::CASSIDY | | Mon Sep 20 1993 03:23 | 16 |
| The hoppers that you store the pellets in use an electric
auger to feed the pellets into the stove. You increase the
speed of the auger to increase the tempearture of the stove.
I guess corn stoves are very similar except you burn corn
kernals instead of wood pellets. You could probably get dried
corn fairly cheap (if you live near any farms).
A friend of a friend has a corn stove. When it's running,
the house smells like pop corn. It burns clean and doesn't
require expensive flue pipes. I think they can be vented out
a wall instead having to go of up through a roof. The savings
on flue pipe should cover the added cost of the stove (which
I don't think is higher than a good wood stove).
One concern with corn over wood pellets would be storing
the corn where rodents can not get to it.
Tim
|
164.311 | woodstove vs pelletstove | AMCMKO::HAZARIKA | | Tue Oct 19 1993 13:38 | 20 |
| Just replaced a woodstove insert with a Whitefield pellet stove insert
and its great. There are better ones out there but I wasn't willing to
pay the price.
Things to consider:
- 1 ton of pellet cost $185 = 1 1/2 cords of wood cost $210
- $135 if you buy in spring | ??
- 85% efficient | 75% efficient
- takes one 40lb bag at a time | need to feed in logs
- pick up pellets when you need | got to buy and stack cords at a time.
them
- easy to startup | ??
- 1 bag of pellets produces | ??
1/2 cup of ash
- blower motors cost $60 each | no moving parts nothing to break
to replace. Labor extra.
Kem
|
164.312 | May apply to pellet as well | VICKI::DODIER | Cars suck, then they die | Tue Oct 19 1993 14:28 | 10 |
| Not sure if this is an issue on pellet stoves, but it apparently is
on corn stoves. If you lose power, there are at least some corn stoves
that do not continue to work.
I forget exactly what it is that needs electricity to run (either
blower or auto-feeder) but they will burn out shortly after losing
power. Since the pellet stove has a blower it might be something to
look into.
Ray
|
164.313 | Pellet/Stove shop. | AMCMKO::HAZARIKA | | Wed Oct 27 1993 09:09 | 5 |
| Yes, pellet stoves don't work without power. One other factor, the heat
output and hours of burning are likely to vary with different brands of
pellets. Try a bag of each kind to find the right one.
Try Dave Yakuboff, All Basics, Merrimack, NH. (603) 424-0420.
|
164.336 | Lighting a coal fire | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Wed Nov 03 1993 08:42 | 12 |
| I don't know what happened to PORI::STOVES, but it has been out
of commission lateley, 'Network Object unknown at remote node'.
I just recently bought a Harmon Mark I coal stove, and haven't
even lit it up yet (it's been installed for 3 days now). Does
anyone know a surefire way to get a coal fire started and kept
going? I've heard that if your coal fire isn't burning right, it
can be dangerous with the carbon monoxide getting out into your
home.
Thanks,
John
|
164.337 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Wed Nov 03 1993 12:33 | 7 |
|
That's crap. If your coal stove isn't *installed* right you can get
co into the house. But coal requires a good draft to burn. If the draft
is poor or if a door is left open, you'll lose draft and it will go
out.
Kenny
|
164.338 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Nov 03 1993 14:25 | 4 |
| A friend who has a coal stove swears by charcoal briquettes to
get it going.
|
164.339 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 03 1993 16:42 | 24 |
| My first attempt at starting a coal fire was a failure.
Later on, I spent one heating season without the fire going out
(except when I went away on wanted it to go out). My record for
continuous coal fire was learned the hard way, over a couple of
years.
Main points:
1. To start, get a good wood fire going in the stove, and start adding
coal pieces to the fire. Don't put a lot in all at once, but
keep adding them as they start to burn.
Keep a real good draft until the coal is "cooking".
2. The key is to manage the ash content during the day. You just
need to get a feel for your stove.
3. At night, shake down the fire....add a fair amount of new coal.
Turn down the draft and go to bed.
4. First thing in the morning....add coal, then increase the draft.
*After* the coal is well lite, shake it down. If you shake it first,
there will not be enough heat to start the fresh coal.
If I had access to a good supply of wood, I wouldn't have a coal stove.
However, for a homeowner who doesn't have free wood handy, the coal
stove is the cheapest.
Marc H.
|
164.340 | Use Hardwood to Start a Coal Fire | N6331A::STLAURENT | | Thu Nov 04 1993 13:00 | 33 |
| .3 is got it covered petty well, I'll go into a little more detail of
the actual getting it started.
First you need hardwood kindling (no pine). Hardwood burns hotter and
longer both important to the easy start of a coal fire. Clean out every
from the firebox. Cover the grate with a wide piece or two of wood. This
will help keep the coals around for the 15 minutes or so it take to get the
coal fire roaring. Place in 3 or 4 half pages of crumbled up newspaper.
Cover with loosely packed kindling (1/4" diameter),use dull hatchet
and gloves. Have ready a pile of 3/4" diameter kindling. Now open the
damper all the way and open the clean out door. If you can feel the
draft lite the fire, if not lite a piece of paper and hold it up near
where the stove pipe leaves the back of the stove. This will fill the
flue with warm air and increase your draft, then lite the fire below.
Wait for the first snap of the wood fire, then start adding loosely some
larger kindling. Continue to fill the firebox. Once everything is
burning about 2 minutes. Then start with a few shovel fulls of coal, spread
out over the fire. Wait five minutes and then add more wood and more
coal. Wait five more minutes than add more coal, the loosely packed wood
running at full throttle goes quick. Once the coal you just added warms up
a bit (about two minutes) you can start regulating the burn with the
dampers on the flue and clean out door.
Coal fires are a pain to lite and why you'd like to find the stove
cold. Stick close to the stove while we're getting the coal started. A
couple minutes can mean the difference in starting over. Talk to a
woodworking friend or a local saw mill for waste hardwood. Just be sure
its dry.
Happy heating!
/Jim
|
164.341 | | SALEM::DODA | Dr. Slick says open wide, your wallet | Fri Nov 05 1993 11:04 | 8 |
| I use chunks of those "starter" logs. They catch easily and burn
long enough to allow the coal to catch.
Fat wood works well also.
It's a learned art.
daryll
|
164.342 | smoking problem now | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Wed Nov 10 1993 09:57 | 32 |
| Well, my attempt to start my Harmon Mark I coal stove failed, I am having
a problem lighting and getting draft (my wife thinks a bird built a
nest in the top of the metal chimney) because the room fills up with
smoke. The stove fills up with smoke and seeps out the primary air
intake ( a draft control knob on the bottom attached to the ash door).
It also seep out of the glass on the door ( this stove has what is
called wind-wash, and serves as the secondary air intake). I started
some kindling when it started smoking out the entire room. I ran
outside, and no smoke appeared to be coming out of the metal chimney,
which is why my wife thinks there is a bird's nest in there. I think
there is a draft but going down instead of up. This stove has the
outlet coming out the back, and the smoke has to rise to the front-top,
then back across the stove to the back outlet. I lit a match and put
it up towards the fron top, and it didn't get sucked up, it actually
blew out. How do I reverse the draft, or get it going in the right
direction?
I will have to get up on the roof and remove the metal cap just to
make sure there are no bird nests ( I would think that if there WAS
a nest, I wouldn't get any air coming down into the stove, right?).
I am going to buy some small metal screen to attach to the top of the
chimney to make sure no birds do get in there when I'm done.
If I was to just use those fire starter briquettes under some coal,
do you think that would start it ok. It says do do that on the package
and not use kindling, but now I'm hesitant about that before getting
any drafting problems taken care of.
Also, I don't have a damper installed in the pipe, do I need one?
Without one, I would get maximum draft anyway, right?
Thanks, John
|
164.343 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:28 | 14 |
| RE: .6
Two things:
1. Forget the damper on the smoke pipe! They never work and they are
not safe.
2. It sounds like you may have an easy fix. Every coal stove I've seen
has a two position handle. One position is "high draft" and the
other is normal, or low draft. You start the stove on high draft
position. Are you using the normal or low draft position to start
the stove? If so, thats not right.
Marc H.
|
164.344 | When you know your chimney is ok.... | DEMING::TADRY | Ray Tadry 225-5691 | Wed Nov 10 1993 11:40 | 24 |
| Not sure if you said you got a manual with your stove. It should
have the starting instruction, if not, see if you can get one. I
have a coal stove in my finished basement so I have over 30 feet
of chimney and a terrible down draft problem when my stove isn't
being used. How I get my draft started is by taking a sheet of
newspaper and roll it into a tube. I light one end and stick it
into the flue pipe inside the stove. I will get a small amount of
smoke until the air in the pipe get hot then the draft reverses
quickly. I'll have more newspaper and kindling loaded in the stove
ready to go and once the stove is drafting I'll light it, close the
top door and keep the lower ash door open until the kindling is
burning well. I would not attempt to start any kindling until I had
a good draft going otherwise I'd smoke the place out. Other folks
will just ball up a piece of newspaper and stick it in the flue and
light it, it works too. I like to rolled technique since I can push
it up in the pipe a bit, it seems to get the draft working faster.
I don't use a key damper on my stove pipe but I do use a barometric
damper which keeps an even draft across the coals. Once you get a
draft going you'd be surprised how it increases as it gets colder or
when the wind kicks up. It will help you have a better burn and a
steadier output. Coals a pain to get used to but once you do you'll
love it.
Ray
|
164.345 | The primary air intake was opened all the way | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Wed Nov 10 1993 12:46 | 38 |
| Thanks for the quick replies!
re: .6
Why aren't they safe? The Stove Place in Worcester, MA says it is a
state law to have both a barometric damper and a key damper in the
stove pipe. Maybe it was just to get a sale. If they don't work well,
then I won't put one in. Won't I get full draft without one?
This stove has a large turnable knob on the ash door which covers
a couple of holes in the door. Opening up all the way counterclockwise
gives full draft, and turning all the way clockwise turns down the
draft for the primary air intake. I even did what the manual said and
opened the ash door a little to maximize draft, but smoke came pouring
out of that too!
re: .7
I have heard of the newspaper trick from a few people, I'll give it a
try. The problem is that the outlet comes out the back of the stove,
and the smoke has to go through the front-top of the stove, and back
across the top to get to the stovepipe. I'm not much good at drawing
but the following diagram gives an idea of how the smoke has to go
to get to the stovepipe.
---------------\--
| <-- \
| ---------- \
--- | ^
PIPE | | Smoke flow
--- |
| --------------
/ \
Thanks for the advice!
John
|
164.346 | pipe level? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Wed Nov 10 1993 13:20 | 6 |
|
Is the "horizontal" part of the flue pipe set at a slight upward angle,
or at least level? A shot in the dark, but this was one of the
problems with my Godin stove, of similar design.
C
|
164.347 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 10 1993 13:49 | 16 |
| RE: .9
"damper "
I haven't seen that in the state laws that I have.
The air/draft should only be controlled by the fresh air intake.
If a damper in the smoke pipe is used to help control the draft, you
stand a very good chance of having CO and smoke enter the living space.
A fixed damper is not useful on the smokepipe. A barometric damper
can be useful under limited conditions, though.
The above comments are based on hard found experiences.
Marc H.
|
164.348 | Need a draft for the control to work.... | DEMING::TADRY | Ray Tadry 225-5691 | Wed Nov 10 1993 13:56 | 8 |
| If you have a barometric damper on the pipe then you could stick
the lighted paper in there to get the stack air moving. Based on
your picture that might be the easiest way. Until you can get the
draft issue understood I would not attempt to start any fires
in the stove, you'll just get the same effect of smoking up your
room.
Ray
|
164.349 | | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Wed Nov 10 1993 14:17 | 17 |
| re: .10
There is an elbow coming right out of the stove horizontally, actually
at a slight upward turn, but definitely not a downward turn.
re: .12
I don't have a barometric damper on the pipe, and am sort of confused
now whether I should get one or not. .10 leads me to believe CO
could get into the room via the damper. I don't think I want to chance
that.
I'll try sticking a newspaper up into the top-front of the stove and
see if that causes a draft to go up the chimney.
Thanks,
John
|
164.350 | | MROA::MACKEY | | Wed Nov 10 1993 15:17 | 5 |
| I also thought that barometric dampers were a must on coal stoves.
I don't know if it is code or not but everybody I speak to says if
you have coal, use a barometric damper. It may be just to keep the
temp level, or if you get a sucking draft from winds to level that
off. Not sure..
|
164.351 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Wed Nov 10 1993 15:48 | 11 |
| RE: .14
Coal and wood are sensitive to the draft, but, coal seems to be
harder to control, and could benifit from a more constant
draft. The barometric damper could help if the wind is real strong
and the chimney location is such that the draft will increase with the
wind.
The damper isn't needed always.....
Marc H.
|
164.352 | I'd put one on.... | DEMING::TADRY | Ray Tadry 225-5691 | Wed Nov 10 1993 15:57 | 10 |
| To get good coal stove performance you'll need a barometric damper.
Since the air inlets on the stove do not meter the amount of air
supplied. As the pressure inside the chimney changes (more negative)
your will pull more air into the stove increasing the the heat output.
As long as your chimney is drafting as it should, you should not get
CO in your house. My barometric damper is always open slightly and
when the winds start it will sometimes open a good 1-2 inches.
So its drawing the excess air from the room, not through the stove.
Ray
|
164.353 | Heat the Stovepipe | SALEM::GAGER | Swap Read Error-You loose your mind | Thu Nov 11 1993 10:25 | 10 |
| RE: Starting a Draft
A trick that I used was to stick a hair dryer/heat gun into
the barometric damper to heat the pipe up and also open up a
window in the vicinity. When the pipe was hot I'd take out the
heat gun and cover the barometric damper with tin foil, while
starting kindling with the ash-pan door open. This worked for
me every time and mine always had a negative draft before
starting.
FWIW-Jeff
|
164.91 | do I fit the framus into the duckhinge? | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:00 | 14 |
| Question about stove pipes. We're getting a wood stove delivered today.
We have the chimney parts which we'll be venting into the same flue
as the oil burner (I've checked the two appliances into 1 flue note
already, and we have the town permit to fill out which says this is
OK to do, so that's not the question.) Basically the straight stove
pipe pieces are a rolled sheet which is open and looks like it should
fit together to make a circular pipe. Does this just sort of snap
together with a little pushing and forcing and then stay like that,
or do I need to fasten it in some way. I would have asked this question
when picking it up, but my wife picked them up and I didn't get to ask
at the store.
Thanks,
PeterT
|
164.92 | | LEZAH::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:36 | 3 |
| Yes - it should just snap together. Pretty easy to do, not
a big deal.
|
164.93 | | HDLITE::CHALTAS | Basketball is a peaceful planet! | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:33 | 2 |
| It snaps together -- but joints *between* sections should be
fastened.
|
164.94 | that eases my mind.... | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Dec 01 1993 12:57 | 6 |
| Thanks, that's what I figured. I knew the sections need to be fastened
together. My town's codes also indicate a damper is needed, which I
did ask about while looking at them earlier. Apparently just drill
and install.
PeterT
|
164.95 | a couple o' things | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Thu Dec 02 1993 08:22 | 23 |
| >
>together. My town's codes also indicate a damper is needed, which I
>did ask about while looking at them earlier. Apparently just drill
>and install.
>
A couple o' things on dampers........
Yes it is "just drill and install" BUT......... drill the holes slightly
undersized and make damned sure they're dead centered in the pipe and aligned
along the same crosssectional plane. You don't want the damper to foul. A
tape measure around the pipe will do both quite well - just 'dent' the pipe
with a sharp blow to a philips screwdriver set at the drill site prior to
drilling to prevent the drill bit from 'walking' (a block of wood stuffed
inside the pipe for denting and drilling will prevent gross disfiguration of
the pipe....)
Install the damper relatively close to the firebox so that the amount of
stove pipe holding 'stagnant' exhaust gasses/smoke is negligible - less seams
to leak these gasses/smoke out of and less pipe to condense creosote etc.
into.
- jw
|
164.96 | | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Thu Dec 02 1993 10:18 | 7 |
| Thanks for the hints.
PeterT
My wife has also suggested she might have someone 'more professional' come
and do this while I'm away at DECUS. I told her I wouldn't be all that
offended ;-)
|
164.97 | | MROA::MACKEY | | Thu Dec 02 1993 15:00 | 3 |
| Stupid question, But I am also installing an additional coal stove
and the BI told me I need to install a damper along with the barometric
one. Why would I need a Damper????
|
164.98 | Have screwdriver will travel..... | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Thu Dec 02 1993 16:02 | 13 |
| Re: .11
>
>My wife has also suggested she might have someone 'more professional' come
>and do this while I'm away at DECUS. I told her I wouldn't be all that
>offended ;-)
>
Hire someone to build-n-install your stove pipe!?! Is the stove in its
permanent position? Is the thimble already in the flue? If "yes" then
HIRE ME!!!!!!!!!!!! I could use the easy money!!!!!! 1/2 ;-)
- jw
|
164.99 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Dec 03 1993 09:34 | 8 |
| RE: .12
Good question....I see no reason for a damper in the smoke pipe, as
long as you are using an air tight stive with intake controls.
In addition, a stove pipe damper is very dangerous.
Marc H.
|
164.100 | Dampers and thimbles. | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Fri Dec 03 1993 10:27 | 38 |
| re: Damper is dangerous.
Heck, I'd imagine it would get damn hot, and could possibly block smoke
you want escaping, but the damper I have, unlike my fireplace which
basically blocks the flue, has a number of holes in it which would just
restrict the air flow, but not block it entirely. Is there something
I'm missing here? Normally I wouldn't see a need for one, but it
is listed as required in the town permit.
As for the stove pipe installation. The stove is in it's penultimate
place. Currently sitting on the concrete floor of the basement, but
we eventually want to build a hearth and put it on top of that.
This is probably next spring/summer project. I've got enough to do to
finish up the basement first. The house was built with this arrangment
in mind, (or maybe they all are), as it has two separate flues, one
for the fireplace and one for the oil furnace with a lower opening into
that flue for the woodstove. The opening is about 7-8 inches square,
an is of masonry chimney liner material surrounded by cinderclocks that
form the base of the fireplace. The lower opening for the woodstove is
the same. Currently the oil furnace just vents into the opening with
an 8" pipe shoved in and sealed with some mortar (looks mortar like at
least). I was planning on doing something similar with the stove
pipe, but I was wondering if a thimble would be more efficient?
And how I would attach it to an opening that looks something like
=========
== ==
== ==
== ==
=========
where the == are the cinder blocks.
Also, if I use the stove parts I have, the pipe is a bit too long for
the distance needed. I have 2 two foot parts, and 2 elbows. Do they
make a smaller straight part, or do I need to cut the one I have?
Alternatively, I could move the stove over, till the existing parts,
fit, but that is aestheically less pleasing.
Thanks,
PeterT
|
164.101 | Was it The Stove Place that told you that? | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Fri Dec 03 1993 11:24 | 13 |
| RE: .12
Don't tell me, this was The Stove Place that said you need both the
barometric damper and an internal flue damper. This place also tried
to tell me it was a state law to have both. I got my permit with
neither from the town of Auburn, Ma, no questions asked when they
inspected my installation. I think they just want to make a sale.
Good luck, my first experience with a brand new coal stove and
installation was this year.
John (who has beaten the downdraft problem, but can't get the coal
to stop going out after being unattended to after a few hours)
|
164.102 | | MROA::MACKEY | | Fri Dec 03 1993 14:13 | 5 |
| Nope it was the Boylston Ma. building inspector. I have the sheet
in my pocket and it is from the Ma. state building code commission,
and it say's in the installation clearances section.
" If a damper is not included in the stove construction, it must
be installed in the connector pipe."
|
164.103 | cover it well | SMURF::WALTERS | | Fri Dec 03 1993 15:16 | 17 |
|
> John (who has beaten the downdraft problem, but can't get the coal
> to stop going out after being unattended to after a few hours)
This is another black art - literally. My sister still even COOKS
on an Aga coal range. The fire never goes out for the 6 winter months.
The trick is to have a plentiful supply of small coal and `bank' the
fire - cover it with small coal & coal dust until you can't see an
ember. it will stay hot & burn internally for up to 8 hours this way.
Shut down the air and draft as much as you can and leave it. whan you
return just poke a few airholes and open the airflow, max the draft.
it may need a bit of fatwood, but it'll be back in a few mins.
Colin
|
164.104 | Right | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Fri Dec 03 1993 15:32 | 6 |
| RE: .17
That's my point. Modern stoves all have dampers......input air
controls, so you don't need or want a damper on the smoke pipe.
Marc H.
|
164.105 | Where can I find a manual damper for 4" ductwork? | HDLITE::NEWMAN | Chuck Newman, 297-5499, MRO4-1/H16, Pole J13 | Fri Dec 03 1993 18:14 | 8 |
| Related question --
I just hooked up some 4" ductwork to feed my wood furnace from outside, but I've
been unable to find a manual damper for the 4" ductwork. Any ideas for places
in the Westborough-Marlborough area? I didn't see any at H.Q. or Somerville
Lumber.
-- Chuck Newman
|
164.106 | pipe length and thimbles... | BUSY::JWHITTEMORE | Carp Perdiem | Mon Dec 06 1993 08:04 | 35 |
| Re: 974.15
>
>an 8" pipe shoved in and sealed with some mortar (looks mortar like at
>least). I was planning on doing something similar with the stove
>pipe, but I was wondering if a thimble would be more efficient?
>And how I would attach it to an opening that looks something like
>
IF you can fit the 8" thimble into the block opening you'll have a
nicer look AND a better set-up. Make sure the thimble is just past flush
with the INSIDE of your flue (no more than 1/2 inch). The exposed portion of
the thimble can extend out from the chimney into the room from just past flush
to several inches.... Fill the parameter voids (round peg in a square
hole...) with mortar and pieces of cinder block. You will then be able to
insert your stove pipe well into the thimble, chink with firebox "caulking"
(4get the name - comes in a caulking tube and is fire/heat resistant - black)
this way you can easily remove your stove pipe for cleaning every couple o'
years.
>
>the distance needed. I have 2 two foot parts, and 2 elbows. Do they
>make a smaller straight part, or do I need to cut the one I have?
>Alternatively, I could move the stove over, till the existing parts,
>fit, but that is aestheically less pleasing.
>
Prior to fixing the seam of the section of stove pipe cut it to length
using a pair of tin snips. You know the seam that runs the length of the
section of pipe - the one you have to force together to make a tube out of a
sheet. If you've already mated the seam you can use a hack saw but I find
it's easier to disconnect the seam and tin snip the cut. You'll get a very
ragged and SHARP edge that should be taken down with a grinding wheel or
rasp/file.
- jw
|
164.107 | I'll try that! | USDEV::JBONIN | Technical Surgeon, AYS | Mon Dec 06 1993 09:07 | 17 |
| re:.18
That's probably my problem, I get a nice bed of coals going, but then
only put in a couple of small shovel amounts on top of that. For some
reason, I fear that loading a bunch of coal on top of this would only
smother the coals already burning, or not get the new coals burning.
Is it ok at this point to put a bit of wood on top of the new coals
to help catch it, or will the red hot coals underneath get the new
coal on top burning.
Please explain "banking" the coals. If I remember correctly from my
coal book, you bank the coals away from the burning coals, but how do
they get burning?
Thanks,
John
|
164.108 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Mon Dec 06 1993 10:27 | 10 |
| RE: .22
Shovel on the coal. The coal burns from the bottom......more on top is
fine.
Only problem is when the fresh coal is first on, some methane gas is
produced, that can ......rarely....get trapped and sometimes light
with a small poof.
Marc H.
|
164.109 | banking = piling it closer... | GNPIKE::SMITH | Peter H. Smith,297-6345,TSEG/DECfbe | Mon Dec 06 1993 11:21 | 3 |
| I know nothing about coal, but I always thought "banking" was putting
the fuel and embers close together and against a vertical surface. In
the fireplaces, that's pushing everything to the back...
|
164.110 | at least when I was a lad... | SMURF::WALTERS | | Mon Dec 06 1993 11:24 | 9 |
|
Marc's right - you can just shovel it on.
"Banking" is the way coal fires are kept in overnight. Make a small
pyramid sloping towards the fireback & cover with small coal, ash
etc to stop air getting at the heart of the fire. It looks as if the
fire is dead, but it comes back very quickly once you poke it to allow
air in.
|
164.111 | re:20 Blast Gate is What Your Looking For | CNTROL::STLAURENT | | Mon Dec 06 1993 13:05 | 6 |
| re:20
What your looking for is called a blast gate. You can get them from a
Heating Ventation Air Conditioning(HVAC) Supplier or a Woodworking Supply
House. The later carries them for use in dust collection systems.
/Jim
|
164.112 | small gaps in seams... | SMURF::PETERT | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Jan 05 1994 18:12 | 32 |
| Ok, using some hints based in this file I've got the stovepipe
hooked up to the stove, 3 sheetmetal screws in the joins between
stovepipe parts, pipe shoved into the flue and cemented with
furnace cement. Looks pretty good. But, the installation
directions were somewhat vague about joining the stove to the
stovepipe. Right now it is just shoved into the opening about
an inch or two deep, but not fastened. Sheetmetal screws might
be possible, but drilling installing through the stove (lip
for want of a better word) seems a bit more involved than
through the stovepipe itself, due to the thickness/hardness
of the lip. In the installation instructions, it suggested
using furnace cement for one type of pipe (the double, or
triple walled one I think) but not for the type I'm using.
Is there a way to fasten this? Should I be fastening this?
It seems like furnace cement may be the way to go, but
I'm not totally sure. One thing that concerns me a bit, is that
though the pipe fits in fairly securely, there is a small gap
in the back in which I can see the light from the flames,
but which I have not noticed any smoke drifting out in test
burns. I did manage to set off the smoke detector, but
I think that was due to not having the door fully closed and
having to deal with my daughter which caused me to be away from
the stove while firing up and not noticing the smoke (the
door was closed, but not latched shut) After playing, familiarizing
myself with it a bit more, I think I've got it down now, but I
still am wondering about that gap. Seal it, or is it something
fairly normal?
PeterT
|
164.113 | | JUPITR::HILDEBRANT | I'm the NRA | Thu Jan 06 1994 16:12 | 6 |
| Re: .27
Small gaps are O.K., since the draft will not allow smoke to escape.
What you want, is the pipes to be secure...i.e. held in good.
Marc H.
|
164.114 | | SOLVIT::CHACE | My favorite season is getting nearer! | Thu Jan 06 1994 16:18 | 13 |
|
Peter - Where's the gap? You won't get smoke from it whenever the draft
is working properly, and if it isn't, you'll get smoke from other
places too. But on a woodburning stove, ANY space that can allow
unheated air to enter the flue is bad. Because 1. It decreases the flue
gas temp which will increase your creosote deposits and 2. Takes draft
away from what would otherwise be going through the stove.
I think you should seal up that gap if possible. You also *should*
screw the pipe to the stove the same as between the sections. (if it
ever were to fall out while the stove was going well - you'd have BIG
problems!)
Kenny
|
164.115 | | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Thu Jan 06 1994 17:58 | 17 |
| The gap is where the stove pipe section fits into the stove, right where the
seam in the stove pipe sits. It appears (and I'm not 100 percent sure about
this) that the ring on the stove itself is welded at that point too,
and the two being slightly out of round has made a small gap. Not noticable
when I sat it in place, but with a fire going, it was easy to see the
light through it. I was fairly sure no air was getting out as the
draft is pretty good, but I can understand the point about air getting
in and lowering the stovepipe/flue temperature. I'll work on it some more,
maybe tomorrow if it snows a lot and I can't make it in. Starting up
the wood stove will at least make it nice and cozy downstairs where my
computer and modem sit ;-)
Yeah, I guess I should screw the pipe in place. I just have to find the right
drill bit, which is floating somewhere around the house. Unorganized, who me??
;-)
Thanks,
PeterT
|
164.235 | Moisture problem with corn in N.E.? | KELVIN::MCKINLEY | | Thu Jun 09 1994 12:43 | 17 |
|
Does anyone have updated info on corn stoves? Does anyone have one?
My brother is looking into them and was told by one wood stove dealer
that corn stoves are tough to use in the northeast because the corn is
too moist. The dealer was not trying to sell him another stove since
my brother did not live in the area, so the info may carry some
credibility.
He will be living near the coast in Mass, so the air will be damp, but
does this really affect the corn (feed stock) to the extent that the
corn stove is not practical?
Thanks for any info,
---Phil
(also posted to STOVES)
|
164.236 | | ABACUS::DRY | | Tue Jun 21 1994 11:49 | 10 |
| I have a buddy who lives in Dudley, Mass area. He bought a corn stove
a year ago, and is not happy with it. Does not seem to pump out the
heat he expected, and has already had to have gaskets replaced. I
favor the pellet stoves.
He did say that it is a different feel to the heat, however, stove does
not put out enough heat on the first floor of his house.
Randy
|
164.237 | Only one drawback | VICKI::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Thu Jun 30 1994 14:33 | 11 |
| I have a friend that is pleased with his corn stove. It evidently
pumps out adequate heat for his needs. I would think that if you're
storing the corn locally over the non-heating season that humidity
might be a factor, but my friend buys it a few bags at a time as he
needs it and has had no such problems.
About his only complaint is that it will not work if you lose
power. Something about a blower and/or the feed system that requires
power and the stove requires it to run.
Ray
|
164.238 | | KELVIN::MCKINLEY | | Fri Jul 01 1994 10:36 | 4 |
| Thanks to .14 and .15 for the info, I'll pass it along. See note 308 in
STOVES also if anyone wants some more info.
---Phil
|
164.51 | Need chimney/stove services... | MICROW::SEVIGNY | I know what I'm doing... in theory. | Fri Jul 15 1994 14:12 | 17 |
|
Does anyone have a recommendation for someone in the Littleton, MA area
who could perform a small installation for me? I need to move a
woodstove from one room into a living room and vent it using an
existing fireplace. I'll need someone to handle the damper work, and
doing the necessary fireproofing of the floor.
I looked in the phone book under "chimney services" and only saw one ad
that seemed to do the work. I called them and made an appointment, but
when they found out what town I'm in, they claimed they didn't travel
that far. (But they waste their money to advertize in the town's phone
directory! Go figure...)
Thanks.
Marc
|
164.52 | Check your local stove store for recommendation | HYLNDR::MCFARLAND | | Fri Jul 15 1994 16:04 | 8 |
| Why not check with the woodstove store on RTE 119 right at the junction
of 495 and find out who does installations for them.
Can't remember their name possible Littleton Woodstove Store.
Judie
|
164.53 | fireplace and woodstove on 1 flue? | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Fri Jul 15 1994 18:00 | 14 |
| Could a chimney be I designed with two flues, one for gas burner and one
for both a 1st floor fireplace and a wood stove in the basement?
I realize that this might be a stretch as a blockage could cause
woodstove smoke to go into the house via the fireplace. I could built
it with three flues but I'd like to avoid the additional cost of a bigger
chimney with three flues and have the option of connecting a woodstove in
the basement at some time in the future.
Thanks,
Bill
|
164.54 | Well, I wouldn't (FWIW) | HYDRA::BECK | Paul Beck | Sat Jul 16 1994 00:20 | 10 |
| I'm not a "code" expert, but my memory tells me it's seen it said
somewhere that "two on a flue" violates building codes in general.
It also strikes me as a bad idea irrespective of code. The damper in
the fireplace is unlikely to be really airtight, so you'd get
exhaust gases from the woodstove leeching into the room with the
fireplace on those poor draft days (even worse if you forget to
close the damper).
Flues are a major safety issue, and I'd think major safety issues
are the wrong place to try to save a dime.
|
164.55 | Doesn't sound likely | QUARRY::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Mon Jul 18 1994 11:28 | 12 |
| Wood stoves can't share the same flue with a working fireplace. It's against
code here in Massachusetts, and, I suspect, elsewhere. Here in MA it is
possible to put a wood stove into the same flue with an oil burner (entry
into the flue has to be at least 6 inches below the oil burner entry).
It may be possible to do the same with a gas burner, but something in the
back of my mind is whispering that that particular setup is not kosher.
Check before you start anything. Woodstoves can be put into a
fireplace, but in that case, they are taking up the volume of the fireplace,
and you effectively turn your fireplace into a woodstove holder.
PeterT
|
164.314 | WOOD STOVE VALUE? | PCOJCT::FARRELL | | Tue Sep 13 1994 17:10 | 8 |
| Recently I had occasion to remove a wood burning stove from my house. I
plan on putting it in the paper to sell but have no idea what to ask.
It's cast iron with front and side doors, in very good condition.
Any info would be most appreciated.
Thanks,
|
164.315 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Tue Sep 13 1994 17:49 | 4 |
| The PORI::STOVES conference might be a good place to ask. It would help if
you knew the brand, model, size and age.
Steve
|
164.157 | Questions | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Sep 20 1994 10:13 | 34 |
| After looking in ::STOVES and still not finding what I was looking
for, I figured I'd ask here.
I currently have a fireplace that has the 12"x12" O.D. square liner
tiles and was considering putting a woodstove in. Does anyone know off
hand if anyone makes an adapter to a flue liner of that size to go to a
6-7" round pipe typically found on a woodstove ?
Also, what I'd like to do (and not sure if it can be done) is to
place a woodstove *in* the fireplace. Is this possible ? I have an
insert now and, although it's nice for ambiance and maybe a small
place (I have a 2500 sq. ft house), it does little to nothing to heat
my place.
What I was hoping to do is basically something like so -
|12"tile|
=========================
| | ||
| | ||
| | ||
+-----------------------+ ||
| | ||
| STOVE | ||
| | ||
| | ||
+_______________________+ ||
|| || ||
=====================================
|
| <-- Brick front with slight hearth
| overhang
Posible ?......Ray
|
164.158 | | 2398::BECK | Paul Beck | Tue Sep 20 1994 11:07 | 12 |
| Vermont Castings (and probably others) sells an adapter that runs a
flexible steel pipe (oval dimensions) through an open damper (with a
pair of metal fittings to "fill in" the damper opening around the
pipe) and up into an existing (larger) flue. You could use something
like this if your existing flue is in good condition and otherwise
provides adequate draft.
IF you need a smaller chimney the whole way up because 12x12 is too
large for good draft, you can also get flexible (or rigid) lining to
slide down inside the existing flue. The woodstove shop on Rte 119
just down the road from LKG is a good source of information (there
are undoubtedly others in NH as well).
|
164.159 | Larger opening = less draft ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Sep 20 1994 15:58 | 7 |
| Does a larger opening equate to a poorer draft ? The fireplace
insert that's currently in there seemed to work OK in regards to being
able to build a decent fire. When you open the door to put more wood in
you can *really* see a good draft, but I assume this is normal due to the
rising hot air.
Ray
|
164.160 | things to do when you're home alone... | 19472::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Tue Sep 20 1994 17:01 | 15 |
| Yes, larger does mean poorer draft. That was the problem with my fireplace
originally, and it used to pour smoke into the living room until the
fire really got going (which it hardly ever did, as it caused too much
smoke in the house.) Then the night my daughter was born, being all alone
in the house after many hours in the hospital, I taped, or otherwise
attached some aluminum foil across the top half of the fireplace and
had the first really nice fire I'd had in the house. We've since had
a custom built fireplace door installed, and that really helps out
with improving the draft. Our fireplace has a nice arch in it, but the
larger opening with the curved top made the draft too slow. The tin
foil test was basically covering the arch, making it a smaller rectangular
opening.
PeterT
|
164.161 | Partial "technical" explanation (full 'o' holes, probably) | 2398::BECK | Paul Beck | Tue Sep 20 1994 21:40 | 20 |
| A large flue translates to a much larger volume of air occupying the
chimney. When this air is cold (no fire yet), it takes a lot more to
push it out of the way to accommodate the hot air that wants to rise
through the same space. It also means that the smoke rises more
slowly (same amount of smoke + larger volume = lower speed) giving
it more opportunity to cool on the way up (and condense as
creosote). Low smokey fires and large diameter flues are great for
setting up chimney fires.
I'm sure there's more to it than that, else .-1's story of the foil
wouldn't make sense (by blocking off part of the flue at the top of
the fireplace, he'd increase the velocity of the smoke through that
opening, but it would slow down again as soon as it got into the
large flue, right?), but having inserted an 8" flex liner into my
12x12" flue I wound up with a much stronger draft than before
(sometimes it seems a bit too strong, but the strong draft coupled
with a catalytic stove gives me almost nothing to do come chimney
cleaning time: I used to get a grocery bag full of creosote each
year with the 12x12 flue and my old Defiant; now with the 8" flue
and catalytic Defiant Encore I get about a cup of creosote a year).
|
164.162 | Still considering options | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Sep 21 1994 11:21 | 34 |
| re:18
Are you talking about the flue opening or the fireplace opening ?
Just to make sure we're in sync, I was asking about the flue opening.
I pulled the insert out the other night and was amazed at how
large the damper is going to have to be. When you install the insert
it says to remove the damper completely. Unfortunately, the previous
owner never saved it.
The opening for the fireplace is massive compared to the insert.
It has a plate metal backing and partially covers the sides. It looks
something like this from a top view -
---------
/ \
/ \
It looks as though you could easily get 2-3 times as much wood going
in the fireplace than in the insert. The actual opening is 27"H x 36.5"W
by 30"D. I suspect that may be one of the inefficencies of the fireplace.
If I opted to burn in the fireplace, a glass door would be a must.
I did experience a down draft when first lighting a fire. The insert
directions said to ignite some newspaper to get the draft going. I
suspect the same requirement would exist for the fireplace.
I'm still thinking that I may be better off with the fireplace.
With the fireplace, I can close down the damper to prevent so much heat
from going up the flue *and* heat the surrounding brick. This seems as
though it would be better in a power outage too, as the insert requires
the fans to get any significant heat out of it.
Ray
|
164.163 | Ah, you didn't specify previously | 19472::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Sep 21 1994 12:42 | 9 |
| Ah... I was talking about the fireplace opening, rather than the flue
opening. I think some of the same principles apply, though it seems
to me that there is some law of diminishing returns, ie, having a 1
inch square flue opening might make for a powerful draft, but it
is unlikely to handle a large smokey fire. There's probably some sort
of formula for converting flue diameter/length of flue into optimal
fireplace/woodstove insert size, but I don't have it handy.
PeterT
|
164.164 | | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Wed Sep 21 1994 13:56 | 23 |
|
I think Paul's analysis is pretty much correct. But to understand why
closing off the top half of the fireplace opening keeps smoke out of
the room, try this thought experiment.
Turn the system upside down and imagine the fireplace opening is a
funnel into which you pour water. The fireplace opening is like having
a large gap in the side of the funnel -- if the bottom of the funnel
can't handle the flow of water, some water will pour out of the gap.
Similarly, if the flue can't take all the smoke, some will pour out the
top half of the fireplace opening.
Covering the top half of the fireplace opening is like patching the gap
in the side of the funnel. This keeps the more buoyant hot air and
smoke inside, where it can work to push out the column of cold air in
the flue.
But to avoid the problem completely, try placing one sheet of newspaper
up inside the flue. Then set up the paper, kindling, and wood for the
fire. Light the newspaper in the flue. The draft will become evident
almost immediately -- then light the fire.
JP
|
164.316 | should have professional look | NAPIER::HEALEY | M&ES, MRO4, 297-2426 | Wed Sep 28 1994 09:15 | 12 |
|
You really shou8ld have a professional look at the stove. Last
year, our chimney sweep looked at our wood stove (he also sold
wood stoves) and pointed out a crack near the back. He told me
that the stove would last a while longer with the crack but we
were to keep an eye on it. It the crack gets larger, we can
replace the back of the stove for a couple hundred dollars. If
we wait too long, we'll have to replace the whole wood stove
which will cost much more than a couple hundred!
Karen
|
164.317 | a fix | ELWOOD::DYMON | | Wed Sep 28 1994 09:47 | 6 |
|
Have you thought of welding it for a fix. might be less
expensive seeing from you note, you can remove the back...
JD
|
164.165 | Update to .20 | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Fri Oct 21 1994 12:18 | 19 |
| Although this should probably go into an insert note, I'll put it
here kind of as a status/afterthought to .20. I've had about 6 fires in
the fireplace since pulling out the insert and installing the firescreen.
I'm at least equalling the output of the insert and I still don't even
have the damper yet.
I did wind up putting a small boxer fan in one of the vent openings
to suck the heat out from around the space between the inner and outer
area within the fireplace. This made a big difference and I'm looking
to get another fan for the other side.
A friend was baffled at first as to why the insert wasn't pumping
out more heat. After looking at what I had, I essentially had an insert
within an insert. Probably not the most efficient way to go and I
suspect it was a signicant part of the problem. The insert was not able
to pass any heat to the surrounding brick since it had another insert
barrier to pass through first.
Ray
|
164.166 | STOVES Conference needs home. | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Mon Oct 24 1994 10:59 | 10 |
|
Just as an FYI:
The much-referenced PORI::STOVES conference has been moved to
a read-only conference on FIEVAL::STOVES until someone volunteers
to offer it a home.
(I have nothing to do with it... just want to see it open up again)
- Mac
|
164.167 | VERY good | NECSC::DWORSACK | | Mon Oct 24 1994 12:27 | 4 |
| >STOVES Conference needs home.
I've been waiting to see this.
Someone please accept this offer !!!
|
164.168 | | 7169::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Oct 25 1994 23:28 | 3 |
| Actually, I took that offer a few weeks ago and STOVES is now at HUMANE::STOVES.
j.
|
164.169 | Did I miss the announcement, or was it a secret deal? ;-) | 19472::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Oct 26 1994 10:21 | 3 |
| No wonder I haven't been able to find the sucker!
PeterT
|
164.170 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Oct 26 1994 10:56 | 4 |
| Did you look in EASYNET_CONFERENCES? That's where conference moves get
announced. I see the announcement there - made two weeks ago.
Steve
|
164.171 | | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:32 | 9 |
|
I searched EASYNET_CONFERENCES the first time and discovered
that it had been given a temporary read-only home of FIEVAL...
So of course, I've been watching the FIEVAL::STOVES conference
for the announcement of STOVES final home. Of course, the copy
still sits on FIEVAL:: with no mention of its move to HUMANE.
- Mac
|
164.172 | Why shouldn't I be behind here, I'm behind everywhere else ;-) | 19472::petert | rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty | Wed Oct 26 1994 15:48 | 9 |
| > Did you look in EASYNET_CONFERENCES? That's where conference moves get
> announced. I see the announcement there - made two weeks ago.
What? A conference to announce other conferences? Sigh....
uh, the answer is no ;-)
PeterT
|
164.173 | | 7169::needle | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed Oct 26 1994 16:34 | 7 |
| Since the conference now sits on a system owned by the person who maintains
EASYNOTES.LIS, I'm sure it will be in there soon :-). When I last popped
by his office, he was in the middle of updating.
For now, I'll get a pointer placed on FIEVEL.
j.
|
164.20 | glass storms/steel doors? | AKOCOA::MCCONNELL | | Mon Jun 19 1995 17:43 | 18 |
| I just had my house vinyl sided and had front and back steel doors
installed, along with full-view storms. After the storms were
installed, I was advised not to use the glass insert, as the heat
would build up and "fry" the four coats of paint on the steel doors.
Had I know this, I would have used a more structured door, like a
cross buck, because using the screen only in these storms (one of
which will get a lot of use) will only wear out the bottom half of
the screen quickly.
Have any of you had any bad experiences with using the glass in a
full-view door over a steel entry door that's painted? Have you
been able to use your glass storm where the sun shines on it most
of the afternoon, without a problem?
Thanks for your usual good advice
|
164.318 | Pellet Stove? | 25151::MPERKINS | MICHAEL PERKINS | Thu Aug 31 1995 21:05 | 4 |
| Does anyone have info on pellet stoves? Pros & cons? Where's a good
place to buy one?
|
164.319 | humane::stoves | HDLITE::NEWMAN | Chuck Newman, 508/467-5499 (DTN 297), MRO1-2/K5 | Thu Aug 31 1995 23:56 | 1 |
| Look in the humane::stoves notes file.
|
164.320 | Guess .0 also missed this existing topic in this conference ... | NETRIX::michaud | Jeff Michaud, That Group | Fri Sep 01 1995 00:14 | 1 |
| 4347 SUPER::HARRIS 22-AUG-1991 12 Wood Pellet Stoves
|
164.321 | good/bad | ICS::CATORIO | | Tue Sep 05 1995 16:13 | 13 |
| My parents use to have one, BUT:
1. When the power goes out, no heat because the fan is still run by
electric source.
2. Can not cook on like old stoves, has a casting around and this
doesn't get hot enough to cook on.
3. Pellets cose about 5.00 - 8.00 a bag and goes only a few days on
each bag.
send mail if you need more info, helped install and de-install
ics::catorio
|
164.322 | Got one. Love it. | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Wed Sep 06 1995 08:29 | 42 |
| See HUMANE::STOVES
I run one and love it.
> 1. When the power goes out, no heat because the fan is still run by
electric source.
There are units available that have battery backup capability. But
nontheless, they are not a good primary heat source in an area
where there are a LOT of power outages.
> 3. Pellets cose about 5.00 - 8.00 a bag and goes only a few days on
each bag.
I don't know where your parents buy pellets but they're getting
royally screwed. Premium pellets (EUREKA) sell for about $3.75
a bag during peak usage season (when they're most expensive) at
most reputable places... but can be found for $4.25 at less
reputable places. I have yet to see a bag go over that.
Prices are even cheaper if bought before October... cheaper yet
if bought mid-summer.
After scoping out most sources in what seemed like nearly all of
New England, I feel the best place for stoves and fuel is "The Stove
Shop" in Salem NH. Despite living within a mile of a stove dealer
and fuel supplier in Littleton (who I avoid like the plague). After
experimenting with numerous brands of pellets... I always return to
EUREKA brand.
Also keep in mind, when gasping at the prices of pellet stoves verses
traditional wood stoves, that most pellet stoves these days are direct
venting and require no chimney (if you don't have a chimney you have to
add a cost of $30-35 an uninstalled foot for metalbestos to the price
of your traditional woodstove).
Feel free to drop me any questions. I'll probably be heading north this
weekend to pick up a pallet of pellets. ;-)
- Mac
|
164.323 | It's Wonderful! | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm a M.D. = Music Director | Tue Sep 12 1995 14:13 | 14 |
| I recently purchased one and I love it. I cranked it up for the first
time last night and couldn't believe the amount of heat it puts out.
This is going to be a great winter - no more stacking wood, bugs,
cleaning bark off the floor, and hearing "Hon, can you bring in some more
wood!".
Home Depot starting selling the Englander Pellet Stove (and pellets)
this year. In fact, the store in Nashua has a demo set up outside
operating. The stoves are priced around $1500 and the pellets are
about $190 a ton (a ton equals 2 cords of wood).
Chip
|
164.324 | | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Tue Sep 12 1995 16:38 | 7 |
|
Has Home Depot gotten into the pellet-selling business as well?
If so, what brand pellets do they sell?
- Mac
|
164.325 | Feed Your Stove... | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm a M.D. = Music Director | Tue Sep 12 1995 16:46 | 4 |
| Re> Has Home Depot gotten into the pellet-selling business as well?
Yup, They plan to stock the pellets all year. The brand is "Stove
Chow".
|
164.326 | | LEFTY::CWILLIAMS | CD or not CD, that's the question | Tue Sep 12 1995 16:47 | 1 |
| Purina, no doubt.
|
164.327 | Bummer, Stove Chow. | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Wed Sep 13 1995 09:29 | 24 |
|
Actually, Stove Chow is a very well known brand.
Stove Chow, although a "Premium" pellet has had some serious quality
problems. It produces a tremendous amount of fly ash when compared with
(my favorite) Eureka and was one of the few brands I tested that
produced clinkers.
Last year two dealers (at least one of which was very reputable and
carried Stove Chow as well as others) told me of having customers
complain of finding nuts and bolts in their Stove Chow.
I don't know what THIS year's prices are, but $190 per ton of Stove
Chow is not a particularly good price... especially at this time of
year.
Anyway, my suggestion to new pellet stove buyers is always:
Buy 5 bags or so of various fuel brands before making a bulk
purchase, there's a BIG difference between brands even if they are
all rated "Premium".
- Mac
|
164.328 | Does it hurt? | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm a M.D. = Music Director | Thu Sep 14 1995 09:49 | 1 |
| Thanks for the advise for us new owners. However, what are clinkers?
|
164.329 | Unburned junk. | REFINE::MCDONALD | shh! | Thu Sep 14 1995 10:27 | 10 |
|
Clinkers are unburned "chunks" or residue left behind. Sometimes
it's due to sand or other unbrunable material getting into the
pellet making process. You're like;y to get them once in a while, but
if you get them frequently you should be concerned about material
being in the mix that can harm your auger. Way back in the beginning
low-quality pellets caused havoc with augers and initially gave pellet
stoves a bad name.
- Mac
|
164.330 | Cheaper | JOKUR::MCCONNEY | I'm a M.D. = Music Director | Tue Oct 10 1995 16:17 | 1 |
| Home Depot lowered their price for a ton of (Stove Chow) pellets to $170.
|
164.246 | Chimney fires with this style chimney? | VMSNET::M_MACIOLEK | Four54 Camaro/Only way to fly | Tue Nov 14 1995 14:51 | 16 |
| I have this style chimney, and since it's getting cold the news
is running a lot of "fire avoidance" deals....
a typical chimney fire is caused by a buildup of pitch, right?
And the fire burns through the masonry and catches the rest of the
house of fire and you have problems...
but I have a steel pipe... is a chimney fire rare in this style of
chimney, and *if* I were unluckey enough to have a chimney fire,
how destructive would it be? Would I even know there was a fire
somewhere in the chimney? (assuming my house isn't burning down at
this point).
I know, I've been meaning to have the chimney cleaned for a while
but I figured I'd ask this question in here.
MadMike
|
164.247 | | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Tue Nov 14 1995 15:02 | 11 |
| I don't believe the type of flue has much to do with the frequency
of chimney fires. If you burn a "dirty" fire, you'll get creosote
buildup in any type of flue.
As for danger...if by steel pipe you mean a single-wall stovepipe,
then it's probably more dangerous than a masonary chimney because
the outside will get toasty-red hot if you have a chimney fire.
If you're talking about an insulated metal chimney, then it's
probably a toss-up. It's as safe (or as dangerous) as a
well-constructed masonary chimney. My guess.
|
164.248 | re .7 | DFSAXP::JP | Telling tales of Parrotheads and Parties | Tue Nov 14 1995 15:25 | 6 |
| >> Would I even know there was a fire somewhere in the chimney?
We had a minor chimney fire in a fireplace chimney once, and it sounded like a
747 was flying thru our livingroom. Fortunately, we were able to close the
damper, which put it out. To be safe, we had the entire thing inspected before
lighting another fire.
|
164.249 | One good point about steel | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Tue Nov 14 1995 15:43 | 11 |
| Apparently, one of the dangers of a chimney fire in a masonary
chimney with the typical clay tiles (liner) is that the tiles can crack
and allow carbon monoxide to escape into the house. I suspect that
steel chimney doesn't have the same problem.
I know of no way, short of removing bricks to inspect the tiles, to
see if they did get cracked as a result of a fire. It is possible to
replace the clay tiles with a steel liner, but the cost to do this is
about the say as replacing the tiles.
Ray
|
164.250 | | DFSAXP::JP | Telling tales of Parrotheads and Parties | Wed Nov 15 1995 07:58 | 2 |
| When they inspected our chimney, it was done with a mirror on a pole. Granted,
the chimney was very short.
|
164.251 | Lesson learned the hard way | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Nov 15 1995 09:38 | 18 |
| re:11
I'm not sure how visible cracks would be on the inside of the
tiles. I would think that creosote would tend to fill them in/disguise
them a bit. It's much easier to see the cracks from the outside, but of
course, more difficult to get at.
I wound up switching from a chimney for my furnace to a power vent on
a house I had just bought. We had a chimney sweep in prior to the start
of the heating season. When he saw the tiles (the outside was exposed in
the basement) he freaked.
The tile cracks did not look that bad from the outside, and were
probably not even visable from the inside. He, and others we had in for
tile replacement estimates, said that the likely cause for the cracks was
a chimney fire.
Ray
|
164.252 | Re: .13; your note probably cost DEC $100,000 in lost productivity :-) | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Wed Nov 15 1995 14:15 | 0 |
164.253 | Burn'n down the house | BSS::BROPHY | | Wed Nov 15 1995 14:38 | 12 |
| What causes a lot of the build up is what you use to light the fire.
We had a fire once and it ended up burnin a good portion of the house.
As suggested it is good to have it inspected and cleaned every year.
I also suggest you clean it about half way throght the winter if you
use it a lot. Most hardware stores sell brushes that attach to poles,
or you could weight it down and use a rope. You should also get a long
brush and brush the damper off. If you do do it yourself seal the front
off and stick a vac hose in to cut the dust.
By the way newspaper is the worst thing to start a fire with.
Gary
|
164.254 | | VMSNET::M_MACIOLEK | Four54 Camaro/Only way to fly | Wed Nov 15 1995 15:45 | 3 |
| re: Newspaper is bad to start a fire
What do you recommend to start a fire?
|
164.255 | What does newspaper do ? | FOUNDR::DODIER | Single Income, Clan'o Kids | Wed Nov 15 1995 15:51 | 11 |
| re:13
Missed it. Must'a been a real flamer though ;-)
re:15
I use newspaper all the time. Never heard it was bad. Could you
please elaborate on why it's bad ? Sounds like I may need to change my
burning habits :-(
Ray
|
164.256 | | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Thu Nov 16 1995 08:59 | 19 |
|
It's been a few years since I burned wood as my main heat source, so
this info may be somewhat out of date. MadMike asked about the
destructiveness of a chimney fire in a "steel pipe" chimney, and Steve
Wellcome pointed out that there is plain old steel stovepipe and the
double-wall stainless insulated stuff.
When I first installed a the double-wall stuff (about 15 years ago), it
cost about $1/inch of pipe. I'm not sure about the following, but I
have read that this insulation can be destroyed in a very hot chimney
fire, which would require replacing this expensive chimney pipe. Anyone
have any more info on this?
Hmmm, newspaper has to be the single most common firestarting material
in the western world. Exactly what is supposed to be "bad" about using
it? It _is_ known that burning colored newspaper can destroy the
catalyst in one of those stovepipe-heat-extractor devices.
JP
|
164.257 | | EVMS::MORONEY | Operation Foot Bullet | Thu Nov 16 1995 13:39 | 15 |
| They sell "stuff" that causes creosote to break down or at least not build
up. Either it, or something I do, works well.
I have a non airtight fireplace insert, and after not cleaning the chimney
for quite some time, I decided I was pushing my luck and got up on my
roof and looked down the chimney to see how bad the creosote was. To my
suprise the flue was nearly spotless, almost as if it had never been used. It
was cleaner than the flue for my oil furnace.
I always use newspaper for starting a fire. I also used the crystals that
supposedly prevent creosote buildup fairly regularly. I even burn small
amounts of pine (well aged, and never more than a piece at a time with other
wood) which is supposed to be terrible as far as creosote goes.
-Mike
|
164.258 | Let the fire burn! | HELIX::WELLCOME | Steve Wellcome MRO1-1/KL31 Pole HJ33 | Thu Nov 16 1995 15:21 | 15 |
| re: .19
One key to your lack of creosote: "non airtight fireplace insert..."
the significant word being "non."
As long as you burn with sufficient (or excess) air, you'll do pretty
well. Severe creosote buildup occurs when people stuff a load of
wood into an airtight stove and cut the draft way down in an effort
to get a long burn time out of it. When I was burning wood, I hardly
ever had noticable smoke coming out the chimney, because I gave the
fire enough air so it would really burn, and I had minimal buildup
in the chimney.
I don't think newspaper (within reason) is a problem. The only
problem I've heard of is colored ink residues damaging catalytic
inserts.
|
164.259 | worked for me | SEND::PARODI | John H. Parodi DTN 381-1640 | Thu Nov 16 1995 15:33 | 19 |
|
Steve is exactly right about air starvation being the primary cause of
creosote buildup. But I did things a bit differently when I was
burning wood for heat.
The holy grail of woodstove owners is an all-night burn that keeps the
house comfy. A bonus is to have some coals remaining in the morning so
that you can jump out of bed, rake the coals forward to the stove vent,
add some wood, open the damper and vent, and jump back in bed until the
fire is roaring and the place is warm.
So my approach was to turn the stove 'way down at night to achieve
this. But I made sure that at least once per day, for at least
20 minutes, the stove was wide-open and roaring. I was basically
shooting for a small chimney fire every day, rather than a large and
uncontrollable chimney fire at some random time. I would clean the
chimney once a year but the creosote buildup was always minimal.
JP
|
164.260 | | NPSS::WADE | Network Systems Support | Tue Dec 05 1995 12:26 | 13 |
|
My chimney fire experience leads me to believe that it is the burning
ambers shooting out of the pipe and landing on the roof that cause the
problem and PANIC.
In my previous house I had a woodstove that I had to stop feeding so
that it would go out and I could scoop out the ash. I'd fill it at night
for a slow burn and in the morning I'd throw a few pieces onto the hot
coals. I practiced the planned burns as mentioned in .21 but I tried
to plan these while there was snow on the roof.
Bill
|
164.335 | Floor vent size(s)? | LUDWIG::LAWLOR | | Tue Jan 02 1996 09:38 | 12 |
|
Hi, I have a coal stove in my basement (semifinished). Currently we leave
the basement door open for the heat to rise. I want to put a vent in
floor above the stove and a return at the other end of the the house.
Is there a minimum size requirement for both? Or will just having
something help?
Thanks
Tom
|
164.222 | | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:35 | 13 |
164.261 | | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:39 | 16 |
164.310 | | CSLALL::NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Tue Jan 30 1996 12:41 | 10 |
164.362 | Pellet stove installation inspection | STAR::SCHEN | | Mon Dec 02 1996 16:36 | 12 |
164.363 | | MROA::MACKEY | | Tue Dec 03 1996 09:24 | 2 |
164.364 | | BRAT::TOMAS | | Wed Dec 04 1996 12:05 | 5 |
164.365 | | VAXCPU::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Wed Dec 04 1996 14:42 | 5 |
164.366 | Thanks... | STAR::SCHEN | | Thu Dec 05 1996 09:22 | 7
|