T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
44.1 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Uno Mas Loss Donks | Fri Dec 15 1989 12:53 | 7 |
| This Sunday nights game should be a great one... Both teams play each other
well and this is a must win for the RAIDERS!!!!
It's on ESPN so all you East coast folk's can watch a real team play football!!
Remember to wear your Silver & Black on Sunday!!!!
Monty
|
44.2 | Bo know's Football | SALEM::HERSEY | | Fri Dec 15 1989 14:29 | 9 |
|
You got it Monty, not a bad year for seeing the RAIDERS on TV. I'm
from New England and now work in Delaware. I've been a RAIDERS fan
my whole life. I never wrote in the old conference, figured I'd
get in fresh here. I've seen better than half the games this year
on TV, lucky year. Well you can bet I'll be wearing my Silver &
Black Sunday night, GO RAIDERS!!!!!!!!!!!1
Todd
|
44.3 | Princess ComeonIwannalayya | GENRAL::WADE | Sheblewmynoseandthensheblewmymind! | Fri Dec 15 1989 15:52 | 7 |
| The dark side huh..............
Imagine a Darth Vaderesque voice: Monty, you hoser, I'm your Dad!
:^)
Clay
|
44.4 | Take Off You Hoser | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Dec 15 1989 16:14 | 4 |
| Yea, so like, all the bowling alleys were closed so I spent most
of my time looking for beer
Big Game
|
44.5 | NY GIANTS know football too !!! | WR2FOR::DIAS_MI | | Fri Dec 15 1989 18:21 | 2 |
| All you Raider addicts beware, the NY Giants will stuff y'all for
XMAS eve ham !!! HA... HA...
|
44.6 | ;') | LUDWIG::JAMES | | Fri Dec 15 1989 18:38 | 5 |
| I have had a silver car for years, I just purchased a black one.
Until I saw them parked together in the driveway, it didn't dawn
on me, I must be a closet Raiders fan.
Steve J.
|
44.7 | | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Who,Stones in '89. Zep in '90 | Mon Dec 18 1989 08:38 | 6 |
|
Looks like the Raiders season ended last night..
Where's the Giants game being played next week?
|
44.8 | re: .7 | LEVERS::STROUT | a pound of obscure | Mon Dec 18 1989 08:40 | 2 |
| It's L.A. Radiers at NY GIANTS. Giants are favored by 7 on the
opening line.
|
44.9 | | OURGNG::J_WARDLE | Member: Namath_Jihad | Mon Dec 18 1989 08:47 | 3 |
| Are the Raiders elimnated now?
JoJ
|
44.10 | y | LEVERS::STROUT | a pound of obscure | Mon Dec 18 1989 08:51 | 4 |
| not yet. don't even ask me what has to happen for them to enter,
but i have to think that at 8-7 they atleast have a better chance
than seattle (7-8) who is also still in the race going into the
last game.
|
44.11 | | GENRAL::WADE | Sheblewmynoseandthensheblewmymind! | Mon Dec 18 1989 09:02 | 3 |
| If they win @ the Giants next week, they're in.
Claybone
|
44.13 | | GENRAL::WADE | Sheblewmynoseandthensheblewmymind! | Mon Dec 18 1989 14:51 | 7 |
| Hey, where's Hooter at? I figured he'd be in here complaining
about the Donk refs working their game. IMHO, Bo scored!
Since the sports math note didn't make it over, here's one:
Rory Graves = Gerald Perry
Claybone
|
44.14 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Tue Dec 19 1989 09:39 | 1 |
| The Raiders will be home for the holidays!!!!
|
44.15 | | SALEM::HERSEY | | Tue Dec 19 1989 10:37 | 7 |
|
Raiders in the playoffs? Only if they win Sunday and the Colts and
the Browns lose. So Saturday night the Oilers play the Browns in
the house of dames, this is the only time I'll cheer for the Oilers.
Lets hope theres still something to cheer for on Sunday.
Todd
|
44.16 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Dec 19 1989 13:14 | 9 |
| Seems like those 2 or three players Al needs to turn it
around are a left tackle, a qb and a 16 game season superstar
back. With the annual pre-arrival hype of Bo starting, has he
ever really had a big impact? He has had some big plays but
many players have had big plays too. The 2 or three times I've
seen him this season, he seemed to have been only a cut above average.
Please refresh my memory.
BoB
|
44.17 | The Raiders are mailing in the final game | OURBOX::LAZARUS | Dave Lazarus NYA DSS 321-5183 | Tue Dec 19 1989 15:33 | 4 |
| The Raider's season ended on Sunday in Seattle. They will mail in
the final game in frigid Giants Stadium,losing 26-7. Bo can't wiat
for Spring Training.BTW,if KC's off season acquisiitons put them
over the top,Bo will be gone for even more games next year.
|
44.18 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | It ain't the size its how you use it | Tue Dec 19 1989 16:07 | 5 |
|
I don't think last night's game helped the Raiders any, either.
The Giants now have a lot more to play for.
Bruce
|
44.19 | What a thought!! | 7R7NET::LOGAN | | Wed Dec 20 1989 12:10 | 14 |
|
Raiders in the playoffs???
Now thats a new twist.
They weren't eliminated Sunday night, they've technically
been eliminated since 1984. Maybe they'll be the team of the
'90s.
Too bad Harden isn't enjoying this year with the Broncos. He is the
only Silver&Black member I feel sorry for.
Russ
|
44.20 | Maybe next year | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Wed Dec 20 1989 13:27 | 8 |
| I agree with ya Russ. I still say Harden is better than Henderson.
Of course Henderson hasn't had the experience Harden does, but Harden
puts on a bigger hit...ask Largent.
Bo will call football quits...He can't play both games tooooo long.
Tj
|
44.21 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Dec 20 1989 15:44 | 20 |
|
Harden? Oh brother! He is THE weak link in their defense. He doesn't
fill on running plays and is usually late arriving to the ball on
passing plays. The only reason he is playing is due to the unbelievable
number of injuries the RAIDERS have had at the safety position this
year. Vann McElroy got some playing time last week and played well.
Unfortunately, Eddie Anderson was injured (I don't know his status) so
Harden will probably start again this week.
BTW, Harden and Henderson play different positions. Denver was forced
to play Harden out of position at CB a few times due to lack of talent
at that position and/or injuries but Harden is a safety, Henderson a
CB.
I expect Bo to quit football after next season. He is up for a new
contract with KC and will use football as a bargaining tool. KC will
give him a whole herd of zeros on his new contract.
HOOT
|
44.23 | | POGO::REED | Oklahoma State athletic supporter | Wed Dec 20 1989 16:08 | 4 |
| ANYWAYS, WHO'S THE raiders PLAYING IN THE SUPER BOWL THIS TIME? :*)
COWBOY
|
44.24 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Dec 20 1989 16:12 | 10 |
|
You are right, Steven. The front seven and the good man-to-man job done
by the corners covers up for Harden. It's kind of hard to call McElroy
their best DB since he has been injured most of the year. He is their
best safety but Eddie Anderson would have to be called their best
safety this year. Terry McDaniel is their best corner/cover man.
Barring injury, he is going to be a star.
HOOT
|
44.25 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Noregia 2 Bush Zip, Nada... | Thu Dec 21 1989 07:15 | 5 |
|
I agree with ya Hoot about McDaniel, he is the one player on the team
that I would love to trade for.
mike
|
44.26 | RAIDERS=AFC TEAM OF THE 80's | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Dec 21 1989 09:25 | 6 |
| RAIDERS are gonna kill the Giants, 24-7.
Carlos.
Ok ...Ok, so maybe I am a little overzealous, but they are gonna
win.
|
44.27 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Mcfall=francessa , true sport wizards | Thu Dec 21 1989 09:49 | 3 |
|
keep dreaming
|
44.29 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Dec 21 1989 11:07 | 17 |
|
But Steven, what about those nasty chilly breezes blowing in from the
Pacific?
I'll be rooting for the RAIDERS but, I hate to say it, I doubt if they
can win this one. If they were home or the temp. was above freezing
they can beat the Giants. They have only had one game this year where
they were never in it, @Houston. Hopefully, this won't be the second.
Alot will depend on Saturday night. If Houston beats the Browns, that
could fire up the RAIDERS knowing that a win very well could put them
in the playoffs since Indy will, more than likely, lose in New Orleans.
If Cleveland wins on Sat. I think they will just want to get it over
with and get home, knowing they have no chance at the playoffs.
HOOT
|
44.30 | | 7R7NET::LOGAN | | Thu Dec 21 1989 11:15 | 8 |
|
Maybe next year for the Raiders!!!
But I seriously doubt it!!
Go Broncs!! Take State!!
Russ
|
44.31 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | It's a Jingle out there | Thu Dec 21 1989 11:23 | 7 |
|
I don't think this will be a rout, but the Giants should control
the game. With the weather predicted for gameday, I expect the
Giants to go into their ball control gameplan, much like the Dallas
game.
Bruce
|
44.32 | What a sorry team ! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Dec 21 1989 14:07 | 28 |
| News Flash ..........!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many Raider players seen packing thier bags at Raider Central
today.
After an interview with "Uncle "AL" Davis" in which he
was quoted as saying.... "We have absolutly no chance at the
playoffs this year". "We are the sorryest excues for a Pro ball
club I've seen in all my years in football". "Even if we luck
out and back into the playoffs we'll get our asses handed to us
in the first game". "Thats the reason I've instructed our players
to clean out their lockers of everything except what they'll need
for this weekends disaster and start making plans for the off
season". "Even Hoot Gibson's rabbid backing of this sorry ball club
won't be enough to get us as much as one more victory this season".
After the interview, Uncle "AL" Davis was seen on wall street
selling shares of Raider stock for 25 cents on the dollar. One
would think this might be a sign of things to come for the lowly
Raiders and their fans...
Film At 11:00
Big Game
|
44.33 | | LEVERS::STROUT | a pound of obscure | Thu Dec 21 1989 14:16 | 1 |
| hahahahhahahahhhhahahhhhahahahaaahaah!!!!
|
44.34 | | OURGNG::RIGGEN | | Thu Dec 21 1989 14:30 | 9 |
| Howie Long must be using Brain Bozworths marketing concepts. The Guy
plays 2 games like a man possesed all season and that earns him a
Pro-Bowl berth ???
I agree that if Howie played the whole season like he did vs. Denver
and Seattle he would without a doubt be a Pro-Bowl starter. This guy
has only started 4 games this season.
Jeff
|
44.35 | | EXIT26::CREWS | What we have here is failure to communicate | Thu Dec 21 1989 14:46 | 5 |
| Re. .32 ... a note like this just proves the point that Cactus Jack is
one of the greatest noters ever to enter this conference! His very
astute and critical analysis is beyond question ...
-- JB
|
44.36 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Dec 21 1989 15:26 | 12 |
|
Jeff,
Quick, delete .34 before too many people see it because the only thing
truthful in it is that Long played great against Denver and Seattle.
Where did you come up with the "he only started 4 games" line? That's a
good one! How many games have you seen him play? My guess is 2, Denver
and Seattle. Bill Walsh, "After a couple of off years and injuries
which Long took alot of heat from the media, Howie Long has reinstated
himself as the best defensive lineman in the NFL today."
HOOT
|
44.37 | Raiders, team of the past, not the future | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Thu Dec 21 1989 15:47 | 9 |
| Best defensive lineman??? I'm confused on that!!! I say Millard of
the Vikes is the best!! 18 or 19 sacks!! How many does Howie (I
lucked out for pro bowl this year) have??? 4 or 5 maybe?? He did have
2 good games. Is he the only faider to make it?? Gee Bo didn't make
it though...I guess Bo knows no pro bowl!!
The Jints should do it this weekend.
Tj
|
44.38 | But Long's better than anything the Donkeys have | CNTROL::CHILDS | Noregia 2 Bush Zip, Nada... | Thu Dec 21 1989 15:50 | 6 |
|
Timmy and Hoot, Bill Walsh covers the AFC so he must hype the players
of the girly-mon conference. Millard isn't even the best lineman on his
team, Doleman is.
mike
|
44.39 | | GENRAL::WADE | Give Panama a U.S. Zip Code! | Thu Dec 21 1989 16:02 | 5 |
| Howie is better than any linemen the jints have too. IMHO,
Michael Dean Perry is the best DL this year. That's right
brown(stain) fans! I really said it.
Claybone
|
44.40 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Dec 21 1989 16:21 | 3 |
| Howies washed up............. ;^)
Big Game
|
44.41 | | BSS::RIGGEN | Steamboat 104inches new | Thu Dec 21 1989 16:23 | 18 |
| Hoot,
Denver played the Raiders in the 3rd game this year Howie was
injured before that game so he might have started the season
opener that's 1 game
Howie came back from his injury week 10 as a FULL TIME STARTER.
This means I was completely wrong he Started 6 games before the
Pro-bowl ballot.
Quite a marketing job for Howie..
Don't get me wrong I feel that Howie is playing the best he has in
years but a 6 game mid-season rest doesn't make my pro bowl list.
This stuff is starting to look like the NBA All Star games with Kareem.
Jeff
|
44.42 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Dec 21 1989 17:05 | 15 |
|
You are wrong, Jeff. Howie only missed three games. Off hand, I don't
know how many sacks he has. But he is not their "sack man", Greg
Townsend is. If sacks are the main criteria, why isn't he there? He
lead the AFC last year, 2nd in the league, and is near the top again.
Howie does much more, like collapsing the whole side of the line. I
have seen most of their games this year and Howie has had an
outstanding season. Anyone that claims that he has had only two good
games doesn't have the slightest idea of what they are talking about.
The only games he did not start were @Denver, Seattle, @Jets and KC.
He played most of the KC game and has started every game since. Your
claim that he "came back from his injury week 10 as a FULL TIME
STARTER" is absolutely, irrefutably, inequitably not true.
HOOT
|
44.43 | | BSS::RIGGEN | Steamboat 104inches new | Thu Dec 21 1989 17:36 | 7 |
| Okay Hoot He came back week 10 as a man on a mission (my contract is up
and I need more money than Haynes is paying me now).
If sacks were a measuremnt of Pro-bowl Bruce Smith wouldn't be a
starter.
Jeff
|
44.44 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Dec 21 1989 18:44 | 30 |
| Santa: Well tell me Al, what is it you want for Christmas?
Al: Believe me Santa, what I want you cant give me.
Santa: Ho Ho Ho! Don't be such a grouch little Al. Things
can't be that bad.
Al: Sure! Easy for you to say. Here we are on the verge of
sports greatness througout time and I can't even buy
a winning record let alone a playoff spot.
Santa: Have you thought about a new coach maybe? I could provide that.
Al: No, I've tried that coaching revolving door trick. You
just end up footing the salaries of too many incompitants.
Santa: How about a change of cities? A new location could maybe
start to turn things around?
Al: No. The public is starting to wise up to me on that one.
I've been schemeing so long on that ploy that even I don't
believe it any more.
Santa: How about some draft picks?
Al: Well now your talkin big guy. What can you offer?
Santa: What do you need?
Al: I need 10.
Santa: 10 what?
Al: 10 Billion dollars to buy the first 10 picks in the first
round for the next 10 years. That'll get us back on track.
Santa: I'm not into giving large summs of money.
Al: See you later fat man and don't give me any of that 'happy
new year' stuff either. This new year is shaping up to be any
better than the last 5 or 6. Hey! That's right. It's the tooth
fairy that carries all the cash! You have here number
Santa?
BoB
|
44.45 | re-1 Was that supposed to be humorous? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Merry Christmas Everyone | Fri Dec 22 1989 07:15 | 1 |
|
|
44.46 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Dec 22 1989 09:31 | 6 |
| Re;-.1
I found it so....... I think thats probably a pretty close
description of how Al would sound on Santa's lap.
Big Game
|
44.47 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Dec 22 1989 10:58 | 13 |
|
Beat me to it, Mike.
Wrong again, Jeff. (This is getting to sound like a broken record.
Kind of like Reeves whining every year about why half of his team
wasn't chosen for the Pro Bowl)
Howie is not up for a new contract. He signed a large one before last
year that should be his last. There are three or 4 more years on it.
HOOT
|
44.49 | Go Black. | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | You can't milk a BULL! | Fri Dec 22 1989 11:37 | 19 |
| What the Raiders need is a quality QB. They can play tough defense,
and with just a little threat of a passing game Bo, Marcus and Steve
Smith would probably be near the top in rushing. Everyone in the
league knows that the vaunted Raider passing game now inhales.
With Willie Gault, Swervin' Mervyn Fernandez, and nexted year Tim
Brown, and TE Dave Dyal, the Raiders have a receiving corp that
can match up with any in the league. Now if only they good get the
ball to them... So I think Al is asking Santa for the right trade
to come around. Maybe Frank (3-0 this year) Reich will become available
from Buffalo. Maybe Chris Miller from Atlanta. Everyone has a price.
Maybe Al can find the right circumstances and pull off a biggie.
Also, I think the best thing for the Raiders would be to get back
to Oakland. No more LA beaches or parties. Back to Raider-type,
blue-collar, rough and rowdy Art Shell-era type football. The Raiders
have one of best histories in the NFL so maybe in 2-3 yrs. they
can get back to where they belong.
Raider_Rich
|
44.50 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Dec 22 1989 11:56 | 9 |
|
Minor correction: it's Mike Dyal.
Rats! .48 was set hidden before I got to see it. It's a safe bet that
it was a rude/crude donk fan blowing steam. Could you send it to me?
HOOT
|
44.51 | A kinder and gentler version | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Dec 22 1989 12:26 | 11 |
| Hoot, the Raiders sip lightly They will be home for the
holidays... Merry Christmas
Big Game
P.s. Howies washed up. the only reason he has made it this
long is because his wife cut him off years ago. I heard
him and Dexter Manly were seen outside the whithouse selling
matches.....
|
44.52 | Redskins have some extra QBs | STRATA::JAMES | | Fri Dec 22 1989 14:57 | 8 |
| re Needing a QB.
Doug Williams will probably be on the unprotected list after this
season. Two years ago, the Raiders were offering a second round
pick for him, now they could get him for nothing. I'm sure Jay
would love to have Doug as a teamate again. :")
Steve J.
|
44.53 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Dec 22 1989 15:04 | 4 |
|
Close. Actually the RAIDERS game Williams a tryout when he was out of
football, post-USFL. They didn't pick him up and the Skins did.
Williams is history unless someone wants a back-up.
|
44.54 | they were going to trade | LUDWIG::JAMES | | Fri Dec 22 1989 16:48 | 11 |
| No Hoot,
I have it exactly right. Before the 1987 season it looked like
Williams was going to go to L.A. Joe Gibbs even called him and said,
"It looks like you will be going to L.A." Gibbs called him back
later that day and said, "We can't do it. They only offered a second
round pick, we wanted a first." (these ate as near to the quotes
as I could get from memory.
Every time I watch the tape of SB XXII they mention the above
events.
Steve J.
|
44.55 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Tue Dec 26 1989 09:10 | 3 |
| Maybe next year..HHHHHHAAAAA HHHHHAAAAA!!!!!!
Tj
|
44.56 | | 7R7NET::LOGAN | | Tue Dec 26 1989 10:08 | 5 |
|
BUT I DOUBT IT!!!!!
Russ
|
44.57 | Peace and quite for once! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Tue Dec 26 1989 12:38 | 4 |
| Wheres all the faider faithfuls???? Sure is quite in here. Let me
guess, they must all be on vacation huh??
Tj
|
44.58 | Refs, weather, injuries, holiday blues... | WFOV12::MORRISON | Bo knows humiliation | Tue Dec 26 1989 12:50 | 9 |
|
Tj,
In their defense, all the other notes files seem awfully
quite. Maybe alot of them do have today off. Let's give 'em
until tomorrow. Besides, they need the extra time to come
up with respectable excuses :^>
Bull
|
44.60 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | It's a Jingle out there | Tue Dec 26 1989 13:06 | 6 |
|
The Raiders need to learn to win the easy games on the road if they
are to do anything.
Bruce
|
44.61 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Dec 27 1989 14:10 | 9 |
| The signs were there this season. The AFC West as a whole showed
improvement except for Seattle maybe. The Chiefs, Broncos and
SD showed turnaround. The Raiders did also but firing a coach in
mid-season does little for the current run. Their record next season
could improve but they must keep pace with the rest of the
division to do that. At one time they could take that for granted.
They cant take anything for granted any longer.
BoB
|
44.62 | Go Niners. | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | You can't milk a BULL! | Wed Dec 27 1989 15:34 | 7 |
| I'm shocked. No Donk fans drilling the Raiders into the ground.
To be honest, the Raiders shouldnt have even had the chance at the
playoffs. I, for one, was looking forward to a 7-9 or even a 6-10
record this year. Thats because of Shanahan. Now with a TRUE Raider
at the helm, nexted year looks a lot brighter. Oh well, go 9ers.
Raider_Rich
|
44.63 | | GENRAL::WADE | You can't always get what you want | Wed Dec 27 1989 15:37 | 6 |
| Raider_Rich,
This is the K & G sports note remember? Why beat on a
dead horse, er, team? ;^)
Claybone
|
44.64 | | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | You can't milk a BULL! | Wed Dec 27 1989 15:39 | 3 |
| Good one ClayboneR :-)
Raider_Rich
|
44.65 | Only In Moderation, Of Coursew | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Dec 28 1989 17:05 | 14 |
44.66 | Plunkett,Blanda,Morrall,YA Tittle, Doug Williams | EARRTH::BROOKS | Everybody needs a push .... | Wed Jan 03 1990 10:22 | 10 |
| I think Doug Williams is far from finished as a QB. He can still
throw a strawberry through a locomotive, and if he has decent
protection, look out. He wouldn't be unprotected except that the
Skins pay him $1 million a year, and you don't give that to backups.
as for Jay, he had his chance a has blow it. What is really sad
is that if he had had a better attitude, he'd be the starter in
Washington right now.
Doc
|
44.67 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Wed Jan 03 1990 22:18 | 8 |
| You're nuts !!! Doug "One Game" Williams IS washed up. He was
washed up when they beat (Crushed) the Donks in the stupidbowl,
he just happend to pull a career game out of his A$$ that day.
If that game were played the day before or the day after it
would have bee a different story. Dougie Baby...... You're
OUTTA HERE !!
But Game
|
44.68 | | CAM::WAY | I ain' nothin' but a simple man... | Thu Jan 04 1990 07:59 | 12 |
| Excellent special last night on ESPN about Super Bowl II.
Boy, did that take me back....Lamonica, Banaczak, Starr....
The good ol' days of football.
Best Play: Max McGee breaking past THREE defensive backs put on him
to box him in, on a third and short to catch a 30+ yard
pass!!!!!
Chainsaw
|
44.69 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Thu Jan 04 1990 08:56 | 3 |
| Reports out of Newark, NJ claim that a Continental Airlines Jet bound
for the West Coast had to be delayed for 2 hours while it was cleaned
up after the Raiders had used it.
|
44.70 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 11:34 | 4 |
| I can beleive that, Mac.... the Raiders are obviously a
Bunch of slobs.
Big Game
|
44.71 | | BSS::RIGGEN | Co Sports teams= Bridesmaids | Thu Jan 04 1990 12:00 | 5 |
| It couldn't have been the LA Raiders. I suppose they wern't holding the
stewardess's either ?
It was a bunch of roller derby players dressed in silver and black
outfits.
|
44.72 | | LUNER::BROOKS | Everybody needs an ocassional push... | Thu Jan 04 1990 12:17 | 16 |
| re .67
Boo hoo hoo ... Small Game Hunter, you're jealous that Doug came
through, unlike Mr Ed.
Not only that, but the civilized world is still waiting for Mr Ed
to pull a career game out of his a$$, or between his teeth, or wherever
.....
Finally, it's obvious that you are afraid that Dougie will beocme
the Raiders QB, and kick the Donks a$$ TWICE a year, instead of
in Super Bowls.
And that is a fact.
Dr Midnight
|
44.74 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Jan 04 1990 14:27 | 3 |
|
I have to agree with Steven. If he does start again it will be because
whoever he was backing up got injured.
|
44.75 | Dr M's IQ + Elways # = 7 | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 15:00 | 11 |
| Dear Dr. Mid_Life_Crisis,
J A M I T !!!!!!!!!!!
Doug is a washed up has-been...... take that to the
bank.
Big Game
|
44.76 | Doug ain't dead - yet ! | LUNER::BROOKS | Everybody needs an ocassional push... | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:33 | 7 |
| Hey Small Game Hunter (I've seen the pics of those chipmunks, rabbits,
and housecats that you've mounted in your den), I really burned
you with De Troof didn't I ?
HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA !!!!!!!
DrM
|
44.77 | It's the Kinder and Gentler "Big Game" | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 16:52 | 15 |
| Not at all Dr. Midnight,
I have to agree, Doug did pick a good time to
pull the career game out of his butt. But, he is
washed up, HOOT even says so. You know, I've
been meaning to tell ya that I really enjoy your
notes. So intelligent. And I agree with every
thing you say.
Big Game
Now Don't That Make For Exciting Discussion
I'm gonna throw up.
|
44.78 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Thu Jan 04 1990 17:27 | 10 |
| HOOT and you agree on something Jack?? I think I'm going to lose
it.
Dougie is washed up, and I do hope the faiders pick him up,
because that will be 2 wins/year for the Broncs. Look at what Jay baby
has done for them.
Raiders = New retirement home for has beens!!!
Tj....Who know Raiders suck.
|
44.79 | Watch It !!!! The KG police are everywhere | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Thu Jan 04 1990 20:53 | 14 |
| There you go again, Tim....... (remember when Ronnie said that)
I beleive you have forgotten that this is a Kinder&Gentler(tm)
Conference. One more outburst like that and we'll have you
castrated. This is not the place to suggest the someone elses
favorite team may not be up to you standards, let alone that
it might sip in public. Remember, Tim...... It pays to be
Kinder&Gentler(tm) ;^)
Big Game
Gawd.... even I'm getting sick of this !!
Yea !!, I'm doing it again.... My office is a mess.
|
44.80 | Maybe the Patriots | CNTROL::MAINT | | Thu Jan 04 1990 21:03 | 5 |
| I disagree, I think Williams will be starting, unless he is still
playing for the Redskins. If someone signs him through plan B, it would
only be to start. I think Doug makes about $1,000,000 a year.
Steve J.
|
44.81 | better than some | CNTROL::CHILDS | In Bubby we Trust | Fri Jan 05 1990 06:54 | 6 |
|
Not that I think Doug is great or anything like that but I could see
him stepping in for the following teams and improving their QB
situation: Pats, Cards, Colts, Chiefs, Seahawks, Bears, DOnks....
mike
|
44.82 | What are you?? Nuts | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 08:52 | 12 |
| Mike,
Was That Kinder&Gentler(tm) SLAM(tm) on Elway or do you honestly
beleive that Williams could improve Denvers QB situation. If it
is the last of the two, I know about this real sweet land deal
on the side of Mt St. Helens you might want to get in on. ;^)
IMHO, Doug could only play for 2 of the teams on you list but
in the interest of being a Kinder&Gentler noter I won't name
names...
Big Game
|
44.83 | LA Colesium to be torn down? | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Fri Jan 05 1990 09:55 | 6 |
| Latest news in the "where will the Raiders be next year" front: LA has
reportedly offered to tear down LA Colesium and build the Raiders a new
facility. The Colesium is a registered state and national landmark and
has hosted two Olympic games. The city is reportedly putting together
the biggest incentive program ever offered to a sports franchise in
order to keep the Raiders from moving.
|
44.84 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:00 | 4 |
| It would be just like Uncle Al Davis to cause
something like this to happen.
KG_Big Game
|
44.86 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Jan 05 1990 11:47 | 13 |
|
They will definately be in LA next year. Their contract runs through
next season.
Tim,
For somone claiming to know so much abouut the RAIDERS, like you did,
your real ignorance of them came gleaming through. Claiming they are a
retirement home for has-beens is a bit ridiculous considerint the fact
that they are one of the youngest teams in the league.
HOOT
|
44.87 | I forgot the K&G again | COMET::JACKSONTA | Go D!!!! | Fri Jan 05 1990 14:49 | 10 |
| Ok HOOT, your telling me they don't suck?? If they didn't, then
they would be in the playoffs, right?? If not, then I guess I'm
wrong, so shoot me.
Sorry about that Jack, But since its been awile since I've been
arrested, then I thought I would go for it.
Also HOOT smile, it Friday.
Tj....
|
44.88 | | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Jan 05 1990 14:52 | 6 |
| Tim, Tim, Tim........
You know that there is nothing worse than a reformed JN'er
Turn in your keyboard, you're going to jail..
KGBGH
|
44.89 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Jan 09 1990 14:46 | 8 |
| I feel all of the intrique and suspense of "Will the Raiders move?"
"Where will they move to?" has been played to the hilt. When you cut
through it all it boils down to one question. Who cares? They are
still a mediocre team with some potential. Shit or get off the pot.
[insert smiley here]
BoB
|
44.90 | Just kidding, don't be offended anyone | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Wed Jan 10 1990 07:07 | 13 |
| Who Gives a Flying %^&%^&*%^&
This team will be bad for at least another 3 to 4 years.
The just don't have the Brains in the front office or
at head coach to pull themselves out of the tail spin
any quicker.
Big Game
p.s. Shell out of a job by end of next season, Hoot Gibson
Hired as head giver, I mean head coach. Brings the Parrot
in as Offensive Coordinator. many many ;^) HOOT!!
|
44.91 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Jan 23 1990 13:29 | 12 |
| Well I thought we might bring the Shanahan debate over here.
Remember when Al hired him? All the Raid fans were snickering
about the deal especially the way Al handled it and how
furious Reeves was. As it turns out, Shanahan turned out
to be a Trojan horse. The latest but not last laugh is
Denver's. Perhaps part of Al's agreement would be to allow
Mike a free hand in coaching staff selection and that's reasonable.
That's how Willie got axed but when it comes to player roster
decisions, Davis holds the trump cards. To try and convince
me otherwise would be very difficult indeed.
BoB
|
44.93 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | The Greek,Cosell,P.Bowlen | Tue Jan 23 1990 14:29 | 20 |
| > Remember when Al hired him? All the Raid fans were snickering
> about the deal especially the way Al handled it and how
> furious Reeves was.
Well Bob I was one that was not Snickering..... I took a stance of lets see
what he does with the team that 1st year ie: Nothing. then all the comments
started coming in from the players and most everyone on the team did not like
him. ie: Not RAIDER material... I know that's hard for you to understand, you
have to be a RAIDER fan for about 12years or so to understand it.
Shanny is a good coach, don't get me wrong but not for the RAIDERS, he does'nt
know RAIDER football and never did... That was some of the problems that
Uncle Al had with him.. yeah maybe he ok for the Donk's but not the Siver&Black.
Watch, Shanny will get another head coach job, maybe even the donk's after
they lose the S.B. and Pat B. starts chopping head starting with Collie Boy,
after all 3 times and no ring does spell trouble for a coach. Look at all
the changes just this season with coaches who only had a few years with a team.
Art will bring the RAIDERs back to their winning ways!!!!
Monty
|
44.94 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Tue Jan 23 1990 15:35 | 32 |
|
BoB,
I neither saw RAIDER fans snickering. I did see/hear most donk fans
whining about the "dirty way Davis hired him", which was really
laughable.
Steven,
Your comments about Shanahan firing the whole coaching staff couldn't
be further from the truth. I think you were being facetious, but I'm
not sure. Leggett quit because of Shanahan. Brown is a highly regarded
coach, he was being considered for the head coaching job along with
Shanahan but Davis thought he needed more experience before becoming a
head coach. I can't remember their names right now but the old O-line
coach retired and the only coach fired was the RB coach. Shanahan
brought in new people for those two spots. Brown was there last year.
Shanahan fired him abruptly in the off season, sealing his own fate
unless his people got the team playing top notch physical ball (in the
RAIDER tradition). In reality what he accomplished was allot of
animosity on the team with his juvenile rules and pussy-foot style of
ball which resulted in their poor start and his own inevitable firing.
Rumor Control:
Rumor has it that Andre Ware will come out this year and will be taken
by the RAIDERS either in the supplemental draft or trade up in the
regular draft to get him. Earlier Ware denied any and all reports of
him coming out this year but recently he has said he would have to look
at the situation more closely.
HOOT
|
44.95 | a bigger need especially if he decides to play baseball | CNTROL::CHILDS | Broncos&AmericanStandardafinepair | Tue Jan 23 1990 15:51 | 8 |
|
Hoot, I think the Raiders would be better served to go off and get
a running back. They have a QB in Beurlien, if they can keep him
healthy. he's got a good arm seems to have sense and guts. Jay is
a decent backup if he just gets his head together.....
mike
|
44.97 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Tue Jan 23 1990 17:42 | 16 |
|
Can't say that I disagree with you Mike. It is just a rumor that I
heard. I think their top priorities would be a dominate LB (like
everyone else), safety (McElroy is old and has been injury prone the
last two years, Eddie Anderson is adequate at one spot but they need
someone to take over for McElroy. Harden, Carter and Lee aren't cutting
it), and then RB (I think Bo will quit after next season and Allen is
getting old. Vance Mueller is a good ballplayer but not a game breaking
threat). I'm sure there will be surprises. There usually are.
You win the three year old giant carnival cigar, Steven, for filling in
the blanks. Two that you missed were Art Shell and Terry Robiske, TE
coach/assistant to the head coach.
HOOT
|
44.98 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Can Collie, Win Super Bowl | Fri Feb 02 1990 11:19 | 14 |
| Here's a good one!!!!
Seem's that Majkowski from Green Bay want's to be a RAIDER!!!!
Of course that's every boy's dream growing up!!!!
They would be nut's in G.B. to let him go, He's probley doing it to
raise his $$$$$$$$.....
Of course he would look good in Silver&Black!! ;^)
Monty
|
44.99 | Just Win, Baby! | CAM::WAY | Revenge is a dish best served cold... | Fri Feb 02 1990 11:38 | 0 |
44.101 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon Feb 05 1990 10:07 | 23 |
|
Steven,
I just put in what he said. I also noted that the report said Green Bay
said they would match any offer. What's your problem?
Shanahan cut Millen.
Hilger was drafted out of Oklahoma St., given a chance, didn't pan out,
and was cut. I don't understand what you are getting at there.
Lachey. One out of three ain't bad. At least your doing better than the
donks.
"Half the league wants to be a RAIDER". I'm only going by what the
players say. They want to play for Davis because he treats his people
well.
RAIDERS in desparate need of a QB? Hardly. Beuerlein is entering his
third year. I have no doubt that he will prove you wrong. I think you
have him mixed up with Elway.
HOOT
|
44.102 | Its left to funnin' time | COMET::JACKSONTA | Still AFC Champs, plus 2nd best | Mon Feb 05 1990 16:16 | 7 |
| Every boys dream to be a raider?? Thats funny...Can't stop laughing
Hey Monty, shouldn't you say, It's every boys worst nightmare if he
was a raider?? ;^^^)
Tim
|
44.103 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Feb 16 1990 15:58 | 10 |
|
Pete Rodriguez (sp?) was fired as special teams coach. He took the same
job with the Cards. Steve Ortmayer takes his place.
This was not unexpected. In what was very uncharacteristic of the
RAIDERS over the years, they gave up several long kick returns this
past season. The writing was on the wall.
HOOT
|
44.104 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Feb 16 1990 16:11 | 6 |
| Hoot, one thing I do like about the Raiders organization is that
Al Davis always seems to have a place for those guys who try for
other jobs but not have the other job work out. I'll bet he's glad
to have Ortmayer back. I'll bet Ortmayer's glad to be back.
John
|
44.105 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Feb 16 1990 16:49 | 8 |
|
I agree, John. I think Ortmayer was with them in a front office
capacity this past season, but I'm not sure. Rattle my memory.
Where did he go/what was his job when he left a couple of years
ago?
HOOT
|
44.106 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Feb 16 1990 17:57 | 5 |
| Ortmayer was Special Teams Coach through the 1986 season when he
went to SD and he was with SD for 3 seasons before getting booted
after this season.
John
|
44.107 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Fri Feb 16 1990 19:09 | 3 |
|
Raiders should announce their return to OAkland in the next week
or two.
|
44.108 | LET'S PARTY ! | FRSBEE::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Mon Feb 19 1990 09:38 | 4 |
| re .107
YEEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
44.109 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon Feb 19 1990 12:09 | 2 |
|
Thanks John.
|
44.110 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | A BIG 8^) | Mon Feb 19 1990 12:20 | 15 |
| > <<< Note 44.107 by JULIET::MAY_BR "Wimp football rules!" >>>
> Raiders should announce their return to OAkland in the next week
> or two.
Are you pullin our legs Bruce or is this something being said in the Bay area??
Monty
|
44.111 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Feb 19 1990 12:24 | 8 |
| Dealing with the Raiders' front office is always very confusing
because they give their employees very ambiguous titles. When I
look at their front office list, I'm never really sure who is
responsible for what. And I gots to know when they play here because
I need to know who to send the official final score sheet to.
John
|
44.112 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Tue Feb 20 1990 18:20 | 27 |
|
Davis should commit soon. He wanted to stay in LA, if the Coliseum
Commission would build him a new stadium, since the current one
can not realistically be retrofitted to today's standards (luxuryboxes,
closer to the action, etc). LA agreed to tear down the Coliseum,
and build a new one, to Al's specs. IT seemed that the Sac/Oakland
bargaining had played into Al's hands and he got what he wanted,
a new stadium. However, a bunch of conservationalists got upset
and made a move to have the Coliseum named a state historical site,
making it impossible to get torn down. End of new plan, end of
Al wanting to stay in LA.
Last week Oakland/Alameida officials agreed to give Al the deal
he has asked for. He has two weeks to accept. He was in town last
week working out the details.
Now we've all seen Al get close like this before and nothing has
happened, so who knows if this is for real.
One more item- LA Times took a poll of Southlanders and asked them
what they thought of the Raiders leaving. 82% said they didn't
care. It shouuld be pretty clear to everyone that the Raiders never
made it in LA (I don't know that any football team ever really has)
and that moving was a mistake from the start.
Bruce
|
44.113 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Wed Feb 21 1990 09:44 | 9 |
| Amen Bruce ! The Raiders effectively lost their homefield advantage
when they left Oakland, not to mention their image.
I also tend to feel that LA fans have a definite front-runner streak
in them.
Prediction : If the Raoders return to Oakland, they'll unseat Denver
for the AFC West title. Elway's 1st game in O-A Collesium will
necessitate the use of Depend undergarments on his part ....
|
44.114 | | PWRVAX::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Wed Feb 21 1990 09:56 | 4 |
| >I also tend to feel that LA fans have a definite front-runner streak
>in them.
Spoken like a true Laker fan!
Denny
|
44.115 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Wed Feb 21 1990 10:05 | 9 |
| Sorry Denny - I speak of LA *football* fans ... they sort of tolerated
the Rams like an obligation, and the Raiders were seen as a diversion
from the beach.
We Laker fans are a loyal breed ...
Doc
p.s. What happened to the Septics last night ?
|
44.116 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Skiing,Soccer,Quiche,LimpWrists | Wed Feb 21 1990 10:27 | 9 |
| This is what you said Doc:
I also tend to feel that LA fans have a definite front-runner streak
in them.
Freudian slip?
/Don
|
44.117 | | PWRVAX::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Wed Feb 21 1990 10:56 | 5 |
| Just football eh? How 'bout those 'loyal' Angels fans who were
filing out of the 'Big A' during the 7th inning of a NO-HITTER
a couple years ago!
Just change things around to suit yerself Dock, we understand.
Denny
|
44.118 | Even Ray Charles could see that I wuz talking 'bout football | FRSBEE::BROOKS | DrM : The Conscience Of SPORTS | Wed Feb 21 1990 11:25 | 5 |
| > just change things around to sui yerself ...
You should know, Penny ... :-)
drM
|
44.119 | | 29067::J_HERNANDEZ | AH,AH,EE,EE,TUKI,TUKI | Wed Feb 28 1990 08:27 | 1 |
| L.A. fans didn't like the paRaiders 'cuz they're bums.
|
44.120 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Wed Feb 28 1990 09:06 | 11 |
|
Oakland Coliseum/City Council meet something like Mar 12th to vote
on getting the Raiders. Davis should announce beforehand.
re -1
They are bums only because they didn't win in LA. LA only supports
teams that win.
Bruce
|
44.121 | Sacramento doesn't want 'em | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Wed Feb 28 1990 12:12 | 1 |
| Sacremento is going to let their bid for the Raiders expire.
|
44.122 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | low altitude earth orbit, me? ha-ha | Wed Feb 28 1990 12:23 | 4 |
|
Max Montoya was signed by the Raiders yesterday as plan B free agent..
mike
|
44.123 | Ortmayer? You Can Have Him! | CSC32::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Sheperds | Wed Feb 28 1990 13:39 | 14 |
| Ortmayer was the Chargers Director of Football Operations. That's
essentially a GM. He SUCKED at the job too.
He alone is responsible for the Clay & McCallum for Lachey trade that
burned the Chargers. He alone is responsible for Gary Anderson sitting
out the season. Hell, I blame him somewhat for the Chip Banks fiasco.
He sucked and I'm glad to be rid of him. (And honestly, I'm not sure
he was entirely loyal to the organization anyway. Lachey for Clay &
McCallum.....AWFUL TRADE!)
Live from Charger Central.....
Glenn
|
44.124 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Feb 28 1990 14:41 | 15 |
|
Didn't win in LA? Say what? They won two Super Bowls in LA.
Ortmayer is going back to what he does best, coaching. The Chargers
hired him for a top front office job. He didn't work out there. He is a
good coach. He will handle special teams.
Hopefully Montoya has a couple of Pro Bowl type years left in him. I
imagine he will play left guard with. From all reports I have read, and
not all from the RAIDERS press, last year's rookie right guard, Steve
Wisniewski, is expected to become All-Pro material quickly. He graded
out very high.
HOOT
|
44.125 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Feb 28 1990 14:45 | 8 |
| re .124:
> Didn't win in LA? Say what? They (Raiders) won two Super Bowls in LA.
Weren't they still in Oakland when they beat Philadelphia in 1980?
py
|
44.126 | 2 in Oakland, 1 in LA | SHALOT::HUNT | Send lawyers, guns, and money ... | Wed Feb 28 1990 14:47 | 5 |
| Yes, they were still the Oakland Raiders when they won Super Bowl
XV in New Orleans over the Eagles in January 1981. That was the
weekend that the Iranian hostages came home, for trivia's sake.
Bob Hunt
|
44.127 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Feb 28 1990 14:58 | 3 |
|
You are right. The deal had been struck but they were still in Oakland.
|
44.128 | | COOKIE::MJOHNSTON | Vigilantes for a brighter future | Thu Mar 01 1990 10:02 | 7 |
| � You are right. The deal had been struck but they were still in Oakland.
I thought they were being held hostage in Iran???????
Mike JN
|
44.129 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Mar 01 1990 10:52 | 2 |
|
That's what Raygun wanted everyone to believe.
|
44.130 | | AYNRND::REILLY | I'm a loner, Dotty, a rebel... | Tue Mar 13 1990 06:23 | 4 |
|
"Oakland" once more...
SEAN/BEER=LABATTS
|
44.131 | | CAM::WAY | Fire... | Tue Mar 13 1990 07:20 | 10 |
| Sean --
Where'd the p-name come from? It is SOOOOO familiar. Sounds to me
like Jack Nicholson, but I cain't quite place it....
The OAKLAND Raiders...ah the good ol' days... Now if we could just
get the Cardinals back to St Louis, the Colts back to Baltimore,
and the Dodgers back to Brooklyn, we might be makin' some progress 8^)
'Saw
|
44.133 | | AYNRND::REILLY | I'm a loner, Dotty, a rebel... | Tue Mar 13 1990 10:19 | 6 |
|
� The p-name's from Pee Wee Herman in Pee Wee's Big Adventure
"I love that story..." :^)
SEAN/BEER=LABATTS
|
44.134 | | CAM::WAY | Fire... | Tue Mar 13 1990 11:36 | 1 |
| Well, I was close....Pee Wee Herman. Jack Nicholson...same difference ;^)
|
44.135 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | A BIG 8^) | Tue Mar 13 1990 12:03 | 4 |
| Now that the RAIDERS are moving, I have to go out and buy new T-shirts
again.... That's OK....
|
44.136 | Why not Irwindale? | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Mar 13 1990 12:16 | 6 |
| The Oakland Raiders? I was just starting to get use to calling them
the LA Raiders. This is good news. With the addition of more
wild card teams in the new formatt, they might even make the playoffs.
BoB
|
44.137 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Tue Mar 13 1990 13:47 | 23 |
|
RE: Why not Irwindale?
First of all they really wanted to go back to Oakland and Oakland made
them an offer they couldn't refuse, $602 million for 15 years.
Second, the site where Irwindale proposed to have the stadium built is
on the breeding grounds of some rare bird. It is doubtful that they
could build there.
Third, Irwindale was short on $$$.
Fourth, Irwindale pulled their offer off the table.
As far as, "might even make the playoffs" goes. Won't that be a breath
of fresh air? Denver fans should very much welcome this. It will keep
Denver from having every Super Bowl record set against them, what few
that haven't already been. They have a coach now, to go along with the
talent also.
HOOT
|
44.138 | Gotta go back one further 'Saw. | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | My lethal weapon is my mind | Tue Mar 13 1990 18:22 | 8 |
| re: .131
>get the Cardinals back to St Louis,
The Cardinals football franchise originated in Chicago,
then moved to St. Louis before moving to Phoenix.
Glen J.
|
44.139 | | CAM::WAY | Take her deep, rig for depth charge | Wed Mar 14 1990 07:42 | 6 |
| Okay, Glenn....
Let's get them Cardinals back to Chicago. And while we're at it
let's put the A's back in Kansas City/Philly (you pick)....
Chainsaw
|
44.140 | | FRSBEE::BROOKS | Real men don't *DO* House Music | Wed Mar 14 1990 08:57 | 7 |
| A's would have to move back to Philly. If they went to KC, they
just be a Yankee feeder team again.
Yup, Bo and Saberhagen in pinstripes ..... :-)
But what we really ought to do is rebulid the Polo Grounds and Ebbetts
Field .....
|
44.141 | Prob'ly no ball this year, let's fantasize then... | CAM::WAY | Level off at 300, rig for silent running | Wed Mar 14 1990 09:21 | 7 |
| � But what we really ought to do is rebulid the Polo Grounds and Ebbetts
� Field .....
I hear ya Dock, loud and clear!!!! 8^)
Chainsaw....
|
44.142 | Maybe we should get rid of the owners | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | My lethal weapon is my mind | Wed Mar 14 1990 10:17 | 20 |
| re: .139
One 'n' please Frank. You might as well call me Gl.....d(
I can't even say it). :-)
No offense intended on my statement. Seemed that you were saying
that it would be nice if things(in this case, teams and stadiums)
could retain their original locale and character, instead of moving
and building mausoleums just for money's sake. I agree with you on
that.
> But what we really ought to do is rebulid the Polo Grounds and Ebbetts
> Field .....
Just recalling the fond memories my father used to have of
both of those places makes me wish that I could have seen them before
they were demolished. Once the Giants and Dodgers left NY and
Brooklyn, he lost his enthusiasm for baseball.
Glen J.
|
44.143 | | CAM::WAY | Level off at 300, rig for silent running | Wed Mar 14 1990 10:37 | 27 |
|
� One 'n' please Frank. You might as well call me Gl.....d(
� I can't even say it). :-)
Sorry 'bout that. Sometimes my fingers go into RCASO mode and I
dont' evnenen NO it. ;^)
� No offense intended on my statement. Seemed that you were saying
� that it would be nice if things(in this case, teams and stadiums)
� could retain their original locale and character, instead of moving
� and building mausoleums just for money's sake. I agree with you on
� that.
None taken.
I tend to take a nostalgic look back at baseball back then. Probably
because I came along a little to late to appreciate the Dodgers in
Brooklyn etc. I've heard so much about it from older releatives that
it seems kinda neat, you know.
To me, the Indy Colts are still the Baltimore Colts, because I was so
used to saying that for so many years.... Guess I'm just a
purist....
Latered,
'Saw
|
44.144 | Bring the Braves back to Boston and ship the Sox to Hartford. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Fun,fun,fun... | Wed Mar 14 1990 12:25 | 1 |
|
|
44.146 | Bring Gilligan's Island back to network prime time! | SASE::SZABO | | Wed Mar 14 1990 13:38 | 1 |
|
|
44.147 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | A BIG 8^) | Wed Mar 14 1990 13:45 | 3 |
| Bring this note back to talking about the RAIDERS!!!!!
|
44.148 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | I cain't be bought...out | Wed Mar 14 1990 13:47 | 4 |
| The Steelers beat the Raiders fair and square in the '72 playoff
game.
/Don
|
44.149 | Here ya go! | 7983::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN! | Wed Mar 14 1990 13:49 | 2 |
| The REF screwed the Pats in the '76 playoff game.
Denny
|
44.150 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | The OAKLAND RAIDERS!!!! | Wed Mar 14 1990 13:54 | 15 |
|
> The Steelers beat the Raiders fair and square in the '72 playoff
> game.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA(tm) yeah right!!!!
re: Denny
The RAIDERS were screwed by Sam Seal in the Pats playoff game....
I will never forgive that clown!!!!!
Monty
|
44.152 | Jim Jupiter was stiffed! :-) | SASE::SZABO | | Wed Mar 14 1990 13:58 | 1 |
|
|
44.153 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | No matter where you go,there you are | Wed Mar 14 1990 14:19 | 4 |
| Jim Lytle fumbled in the 77 playoff game, unfairly giving the Donks
the title!
JD
|
44.154 | Send Clevscum(tm) back to the AAFC ! | LUNER::BROOKS | Real men don't *DO* House Music | Wed Mar 14 1990 14:46 | 1 |
|
|
44.155 | Rob Lytle | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Mar 14 1990 16:23 | 1 |
|
|
44.156 | Marino want to be an Oakland Raider! | SUNRIZ::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Thu Mar 15 1990 09:00 | 8 |
| Marino hands off to Bo, and *another* 90+ yard touchdown for Bo!
Seriously, the Raiders would become instant meat and potatoes!
John
|
44.157 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | The OAKLAND RAIDERS!!!! | Thu Mar 15 1990 09:57 | 7 |
| > -< Marino want to be an Oakland Raider! >-
So does 99% of the NFL!!!!! You never hear of a player saying that he wants
to be a Donk do you!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA(tm)
Monty
|
44.158 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Mar 15 1990 10:10 | 3 |
|
Marino wanted to be traded last year, also. Don't bet on him going
anywhere.
|
44.159 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Mar 15 1990 13:56 | 4 |
| I'd like to see Marino playing for the RAIDERS, I'd also like
to see the RAIDERS get Andre baby seeing as how he's foregoing.
Carlos
|
44.160 | Yet, another 8-8 season | COMET::JACKSONTA | Spring Fever | Mon Mar 26 1990 12:57 | 7 |
| I hear the faiders got another looser of a QB. Booby Habear (sp?)
from the Aints. So now they will have Gay and Booby or is that Jay and
Bobby.
Marino in Black & Silver??? All rumors....
Tim
|
44.161 | re .160: Hebert | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Teenage Mutant Ninja Noter | Mon Mar 26 1990 13:36 | 1 |
|
|
44.163 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Mar 27 1990 11:04 | 11 |
| I don't think Hebert is officially a Raider yet, according to the
local paper Hebert says he has talked with Al Davis and plans on
joining the Raiders practice on May 9th, but Al says the Raiders
are still negotiating and are interested in Hebert and Marino.
Ron Brown, however, is official and he will be a fine addition.
He is a very talented athlete that can play WR,DE,and on special
teams. I think he was the fastest man in the NFL a couple of years
ago, and I'm sure he's still right up there.
Carlos
|
44.164 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Tue Mar 27 1990 12:09 | 10 |
|
Carlos,
Isn't Brown a bit on the small side to play DE? Ha ha! I know, you
meant DB. The RAIDERS plan to make him a DB and kick returner since
I think Bobby Joe Edmunds signed with someone else, forget who, since
he was unprotected. The RAIDERS also lost back-up DE, Mark Mraz, to
Denver. Good pick-up for Denver. He will probably start.
HOOT
|
44.165 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Tue Mar 27 1990 12:47 | 2 |
| The Saints owner has denied reports that Hebert is going to the
Raiders.
|
44.166 | Oops! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Tue Mar 27 1990 13:43 | 6 |
| My mistake, he is a DB, but with his speed maybe they could use
him as a DE and have him zip around the offensive line, especially
against teams that have QBs that like to scramble like old horse
face himself. Then again, with great ideas like that it's no wonder
I work for DEC instead of somewhere in the NFL.
Carlos
|
44.167 | Figure this one out | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Tue Mar 27 1990 15:30 | 11 |
|
Al Davis was meeting with Tom Bradley Sun. and has worked out a deal
where he will talk only with Spectacor (the managers of the LA
Coliseum) and not the LA Coliseum Commission (who he doesn't get
along with). Speculation is that he is using the Oakland deal that
he made to up the ante in LA, and possiblly stay there.
Maybe Hoot an Monty can explain this one.
Bruce
|
44.169 | | 7983::RIEU | In search of...Mr Trout! | Wed Mar 28 1990 06:57 | 3 |
| HE already screwed Irwindale out of $10 million. Why should he stop
now?
Denny
|
44.170 | Al is not one to turn down a $10 million gift | 4159::NAZZARO | Thanks Minutemen, for a GREAT year!! | Wed Mar 28 1990 10:42 | 4 |
| Hey, if Irwindale is STUPID enough to give him a non-refundable
check for $10 million, they DESERVE to be screwed.
NAZZ
|
44.171 | Now to confuse some with the facts. | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Mar 28 1990 10:42 | 18 |
|
He didn't "screw" anyone. Irwindale pulled out.
Since the Colisium Commission was so incompetent, Spectacor took over.
It has absolutely nothing to do with Davis not getting along with the
commission, who screwed him royally in breaching their contract by not
completing the agreed upon renovations. A couple of city council-
critters in Oakland are trying to get enough signatures to put the issue
of bringing the RAIDERS back on the ballot. If they are successful at
getting the required 20,000 signatures, it will be on the Nov. ballot.
Spectacor approached Davis to try and talk him out of going back to
Oakland and to make an offer for them to stay. Why wouldn't he listen?
Spectacor also said that if they don't get the RAIDERS to stay in LA,
they will try to get another NFL team to move there (preferrably) or go
for an expansion team.
HOOT
|
44.172 | Screwed if you pull out - or fi you don't ! HAHAHA ! | EARRTH::BROOKS | No, idiot ! Not Bush ...BROOKS ! | Wed Mar 28 1990 10:57 | 9 |
|
re .171
> He didn't "screw" anyone. Irwindale pulled out.
Substantial penality for early withdrawl, eh Hoot ?
I hope Irwindale didn't pull out too soon ... heh heh heh ....
|
44.174 | | FTMUDG::DUGGAN | | Wed Mar 28 1990 11:09 | 11 |
| re: going after another team:
How about the
LOS ANGELES RAMS! What a concept! They wouldn't even have to change
their name.....
8*)
...mike
|
44.175 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Mar 28 1990 16:39 | 22 |
|
But the Rams moved out of LA. Of course noone whines about them
supposedly "screwing" someone over it. Or the Cards, Jets, Giants,
Colts, Chargers, Chiefs ect.,for that matter.
Come on Steven. Davis didn't seek out the LA people, they came to him
after they found out about the move by some in Oakland to stop the city
from putting up the big bucks to get them back. I doubt the people will
vote it down. Unless Oakland's mayor has Dan Reeves/Pat Bowlen Liars
Syndrome, the city will break even from the money generated by the
RAIDERS being there. He said it isn't intended to be a money making
proposition but a morale boosting rallying point for a down community
since the people there still love the RAIDERS, witness last year's pre-
season game there. Then he said they would not be losing money. I did
not catch the fiscal details. If by chance Oakland does turn them down,
staying in LA would be the contingency plan. Don't expect it to happen.
Doc,
Brutal, simply brutal!
HOOT
|
44.176 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Wed Mar 28 1990 19:42 | 57 |
| <<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 44.171 The "RAIDERS" 171 of 175
GENRAL::GIBSON 18 lines 28-MAR-1990 09:42
-< Now to confuse some with the facts. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Since the Colisium Commission was so incompetent, Spectacor took over.
> It has absolutely nothing to do with Davis not getting along with the
> commission,
EVERYTHING I've read here has said that the problem is that Al
and the C.C. just don't get along. I would say that the Bay Area
media is probably a lot more objective about this than Al or any
of his cronies. I don't understand the incompetent part.
> who screwed him royally in breaching their contract by not
> completing the agreed upon renovations.
screwed royally may be an overstatement. So the seats that are
going to be empty anyway didn't get fixed, big deal.
> A couple of city council-
> critters in Oakland are trying to get enough signatures to put the issue
> of bringing the RAIDERS back on the ballot. If they are successful at
> getting the required 20,000 signatures, it will be on the Nov. ballot.
It's not a couple city council people are trying to get the signatures
(there wasn't even 2 city council votes against the idea), it regular
citizens who are concerned where the money could go.
> Spectacor approached Davis to try and talk him out of going back to
> Oakland and to make an offer for them to stay. Why wouldn't he listen?
How about because he said he was definitely going back to Oakland.
Oh, that's right, were only talking about going back on his word.
I guess he could listen.
> Spectacor also said that if they don't get the RAIDERS to stay in LA,
> they will try to get another NFL team to move there (preferrably) or go
> for an expansion team.
Spectacor has said they doubt they'd get an expansion team.
Coincidentally, Spectacor is the company that SF was using to build
their downtown stadium.
Bruce
|
44.177 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Wed Mar 28 1990 19:58 | 68 |
|
================================================================================
Note 44.175 The "RAIDERS" 175 of 176
GENRAL::GIBSON 22 lines 28-MAR-1990 15:39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> But the Rams moved out of LA. Of course noone whines about them
> supposedly "screwing" someone over it. Or the Cards, Jets, Giants,
> Colts, Chargers, Chiefs ect.,for that matter.
Talk to some Baltimore fans. They do in fact whine about it. And
although the Giants, Rams, Jets (you forgot the Pats) did move out
of the city they are in, they are still within the same metropolitan
area, and a reasonable commute to the games (its actually closer
for many of the fans). Comparing the Raiders move to the Dallas
Texans moving to KC is ludicrous.
> Come on Steven. Davis didn't seek out the LA people, they came to him
> after they found out about the move by some in Oakland to stop the city
> from putting up the big bucks to get them back.
But Davis didn't say "no, I already promised Oakland." either.
> I doubt the people will
> vote it down.
Don't be so sure. Most of the Raider fans are from the East Bay,
and not Oakland. Only the people of Oakland get to vote and the
way the petitioners have fanned the flames with propaganda, the
move is in definite doubt. Don Perata, who is responsible for getting
the Raiders to move back, has said that if the thing gets put on
the ballot, he's sure the Raiders won't be here.
> Unless Oakland's mayor has Dan Reeves/Pat Bowlen Liars
> Syndrome, the city will break even from the money generated by the
> RAIDERS being there.
There is one monstrous if in all those statements: IF every game
is a sell out for the next 15 years. The city has promised to buy
up any unsold seats. And none of that is figured into any of anyone's
calculations (except Al's). If you consider that there has been
some erosion of the fan base in the last 10 years (especially when
you consider that the 9ers are the glamor boys of the Bay Area)
and that, contrary to popular belief, the Raiders didn't always
sell out when they were here, there is a large risk that the city
will be buying up some seats overe the next few years.
> He said it isn't intended to be a money making
> proposition but a morale boosting rallying point for a down community
> since the people there still love the RAIDERS, witness last year's pre-
> season game there. Then he said they would not be losing money.
Essentially what is happening is the city of Oakland is financing
the Raiders to come back, to the benefit of the entire East Bay/
Alameda County. They aren't in any shape to do that.
> I did
> not catch the fiscal details. If by chance Oakland does turn them down,
> staying in LA would be the contingency plan. Don't expect it to happen.
Don't be surprised if it falls apart. Al seems to be showing to
me that the least little opposition to this and he'll be running
back to LA. I think it would teach him a lesson if the people said
'no', but I bet he'll be gone before they even get a chance to vote.
Bruce
|
44.178 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | The California RAIDERS | Thu Mar 29 1990 10:08 | 81 |
| <<< Note 44.176 by JULIET::MAY_BR "Wimp football rules!" >>>
<<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 44.171 The "RAIDERS" 171 of 175
GENRAL::GIBSON 18 lines 28-MAR-1990 09:42
-< Now to confuse some with the facts. >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Since the Colisium Commission was so incompetent, Spectacor took over.
> It has absolutely nothing to do with Davis not getting along with the
> commission,
* EVERYTHING I've read here has said that the problem is that Al
* and the C.C. just don't get along. I would say that the Bay Area
* media is probably a lot more objective about this than Al or any
* of his cronies. I don't understand the incompetent part.
They said that they would do this and that but yet never even drove one nail
in anything to bring up the standards of the Colisium. If it wern't for the
big Olympic games that place would have fallen in on itself a few years ago.
The place is a shambles!!!
> who screwed him royally in breaching their contract by not
> completing the agreed upon renovations.
* screwed royally may be an overstatement. So the seats that are
* going to be empty anyway didn't get fixed, big deal.
The big deal was Delux boxes around the top of the Colisium and whole new
seating in some area's... The RAIDERS/Donk's game last year had a record
crowd for that game.. Something like 90,000+ They usually get about 50,000
for each game... Hell the dam places sit's about 103,000....
> A couple of city council-
> critters in Oakland are trying to get enough signatures to put the issue
> of bringing the RAIDERS back on the ballot. If they are successful at
> getting the required 20,000 signatures, it will be on the Nov. ballot.
* It's not a couple city council people are trying to get the signatures
* (there wasn't even 2 city council votes against the idea), it regular
* citizens who are concerned where the money could go.
This will be the big issue of the RAIDERS coming back to Oakland... Most folks
want the money to go somewhere else... But where do you start to bring back
some replenishment to a place that's been slowly going down hill....
> Spectacor approached Davis to try and talk him out of going back to
> Oakland and to make an offer for them to stay. Why wouldn't he listen?
* How about because he said he was definitely going back to Oakland.
* Oh, that's right, were only talking about going back on his word.
* I guess he could listen.
He's put up the the lies of the C.C. for a long time and I beleave that he
is taking a dim veiw of these Spector people. Wern't they the bad guy's in
the James Bond movies????
> Spectacor also said that if they don't get the RAIDERS to stay in LA,
> they will try to get another NFL team to move there (preferrably) or go
> for an expansion team.
* Spectacor has said they doubt they'd get an expansion team.
* Coincidentally, Spectacor is the company that SF was using to build
* their downtown stadium.
Hell Most of the Donk fans would like to see that team go...;^) Any ties
with this Spector people and the 49er's?????? Makes you wonder....
Monty
|
44.179 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Mar 29 1990 10:29 | 22 |
|
Davis "going back on his word"
Hardly. If Oakland says "No", how do you turn that into Davis going
back on his word? As far as Davis is concerned, it was a done deal.
Oakland is the party that is saying, "well maybe not, now".
RE: incompetence
That is why Spectacor is in and The C.C. is out. C.C was doing a lousy
job and were canned. Of course Davis didn't get along with them. Anyone
would be a bit PO'd at a group that breached a multi-million dollar
contract on them. They were under contract to put in skyboxes (big $$
income), install seats closer to the field (as it is now the fans are
about as far from the field as in any stadium in the country), ect.
Sure I can see how some of you don't like the guy but trying to blame
him for Oakland possibly pulling out at the last minute and ragging on
him because he is looking at other options if Oakland pulls out, is
simply ludicrous.
HOOT
|
44.180 | Spectacor | SHALOT::HUNT | A single ping please, Vasily. | Thu Mar 29 1990 10:31 | 10 |
| By the way, Spectacor is a Philadelphia company owned by the
Snider family, the same Sniders who own the Philadelphia Flyers
hockey team and the Philadelphia Spectrum facility.
Spectacor's business is sports arena planning, construction,
operations, management and maintenance. They have done some
serious worldwide growing in the last few years. They get called
in on just about all new sports construction projects these days.
Bob Hunt
|
44.182 | ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | ABTL=ABTP these days | Thu Mar 29 1990 11:49 | 6 |
|
But Steven isn't Uncle Al's present way the American Way?
did I get lost somewhere?
mike
|
44.183 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Mar 29 1990 12:03 | 8 |
| It amazes me, as to how someone can make such a purely brilliant
comment as : " the Raiders have turned to crap and you *can't* argue
with that. " with the fore knowledge that this team has beaten his
beloved Broncos three of the last four times they've played, and
something like forty to nineteen as a series.
Carlos
|
44.184 | how many days until the season begins??? 8^) | LEVERS::STROUT | Is that Wilt DISGUISED as Jordan?? | Thu Mar 29 1990 12:08 | 0 |
44.186 | | CAM::WAY | Be excellent to each other | Thu Mar 29 1990 13:20 | 23 |
| � Raiders since the move, and then tell me why they haven't turned to
� crap, tell me why they are still such a great team.
Crap, in this instance, is a rather ambiguous term. Are you talking
about a substance containing a high fecal content? Or are you generically
speaking of something less than desirable on the dinner table?
At any rate, for matter of one form (the LA Raiders) to turn into
matter of another form ("crap"), the energies involved would leave
a hole in the earth roughly the size of Los Angeles. This follows,
roughly, the principle of the ancient alchemist trying to turn lead
into gold.
Since Los Angeles is still standing, I'd presume that the Raiders
haven't turned into anything....
Schlep hop opts,
Chainsaw
|
44.187 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Thu Mar 29 1990 13:35 | 63 |
| <<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;1 >>>
-< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 44.178 The "RAIDERS" 178 of 186
COMET::MONTGOMERY "The California RAIDERS" 81 lines 29-MAR-1990 09:08
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The big deal was Delux boxes around the top of the Colisium and whole new
> seating in some area's... The RAIDERS/Donk's game last year had a record
> crowd for that game.. Something like 90,000+ They usually get about 50,000
> for each game... Hell the dam places sit's about 103,000....
My point was, and still is, that even if they built those seats,
no one would buy them LA has just not taken to the Raiders (and
there is no need for you to go in and edit my reply by capitalizing
the team name), They had one big crowd at one game, and still averaged
around 50,000 (or less). Think what the attendance will be this
year, when the people know the team is probably gone. Could that
be why Al is still leaving hints that he might be in LA? To get
people to go to the game under a false pretense that the team won't
leave afterall? Nah, Al wouldn't do anything underhanded, would
he.
> This will be the big issue of the RAIDERS coming back to Oakland... Most folks
> want the money to go somewhere else... But where do you start to bring back
> some replenishment to a place that's been slowly going down hill....
I realize that you are a bit removed from the situation, but youy
shouldn't speak about something you don't know about. Oakland isn't
slowly going downhill. If anything they have turned things around
considerably. The A's have helped contribute to that.
> He's put up the the lies of the C.C. for a long time and I beleave that he
> is taking a dim veiw of these Spector people. Wern't they the bad guy's in
> the James Bond movies????
Al loves the Spectacor people. They are the ones trying to cut
another deal with him. Aside to Bob Hunt-- I think Spectacor was
recently bought by a big conglomerate, McGraw-Hill comes to my mind.
>* Spectacor has said they doubt they'd get an expansion team.
>* Coincidentally, Spectacor is the company that SF was using to build
>* their downtown stadium.
>Hell Most of the Donk fans would like to see that team go...;^) Any ties
>with this Spector people and the 49er's?????? Makes you wonder....
Great, here comes a Raiders fan with another of their great conspiracy
theories. Spectacor was going to build a downtown baseball stadium
for the Giants. It had absolutely nothing to do with the 9ers.
They care very little about what happens. The only Raiders fans
left are a few diehards, the rest have become 9ers fans. With the
way the 49ers look for the next few years, there is no reason to
think that that would change.
Bruce
|
44.188 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Thu Mar 29 1990 13:50 | 48 |
| Note 44.179 The "RAIDERS" 179 of 187
GENRAL::GIBSON 22 lines 29-MAR-1990 09:29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Davis "going back on his word"
> Hardly. If Oakland says "No", how do you turn that into Davis going
> back on his word? As far as Davis is concerned, it was a done deal.
> Oakland is the party that is saying, "well maybe not, now".
Oakland hasn't said no, a few people have passed out petitions.
Oakland (the mayor and his council, the only people who speak for
Oakland now) has said yes, and Davis said yes. About a week later,
Davis was back in LA, talking to the Mayor of LA and Sp[ectacor
about another deal.
> RE: incompetence
> That is why Spectacor is in and The C.C. is out. C.C was doing a lousy
> job and were canned. Of course Davis didn't get along with them. Anyone
> would be a bit PO'd at a group that breached a multi-million dollar
> contract on them. They were under contract to put in skyboxes (big $$
> income), install seats closer to the field (as it is now the fans are
> about as far from the field as in any stadium in the country), ect.
The CC was NOT canned. Spectacor is merely a liason between the
two parties.
> Sure I can see how some of you don't like the guy but trying to blame
> him for Oakland possibly pulling out at the last minute and ragging on
> him because he is looking at other options if Oakland pulls out, is
> simply ludicrous.
I didn't blame him for Oakland possibly pulling out at the last
minute. Where did you get that? Unless you are going to use lesson's
from the Monty School of Advanced Editing, you won't find anything.
My point is that why is he already talking to Spectacor? Nothing
will be decided in Oakland until the end of the year, and he doesn't
even need a stadium for two years after that. All he is doing by
engaging in those talks is getting people in Oakland more upset
about a deal that was marginal at best.
Bruce
|
44.189 | Pick on someone the Broncos can beat ! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Mar 29 1990 14:37 | 9 |
| Steven, you've missed my point. I just think it's strange that
you call my team "crap" when we both know that my team beats your
team the majority of the times that they play. Kinda like a sore
loser or something. I agree with you that they are not as good in L.A.
as they were in Oakland, but they're far from crap. Since they've
been in L.A. they've won the Super Bowl once; How many times have
the Broncos won it since they've been in Denver ?????
Carlos
|
44.191 | | GENRAL::WADE | Is it the shoes! | Thu Mar 29 1990 15:40 | 11 |
| * team he puts on the field is at a lever far below what I have grown
* accustomed to. One of the biggest reasons for that letdown is
* lack of fan support,
Steve,
Exactly, what *lever* are you talking about. You should see
your doctor about that letdown problem....:^) Do you really
need to do that in front of a fan (could be dangerous!).
Claybone
|
44.192 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Mar 29 1990 17:41 | 28 |
|
I don't get your point, Bruce. I say "if Oakland says no", you say
Oakland hasn't said no. Sounds like the same thing to me. When you say
Davis went back to LA and talked to the mayor and Spectacor you failed
to mention this was after the petition started and that they came to
Davis. The rumors are that Davis was going to buy out his contract in
LA for at least 1991, and possibly 1990, with the Oakland money. If he
doesn't know until Nov. whether they will be turned down or not that
doesn't leave him much time. In the mean time his current contract is
running out and these things aren't ironed out very quickly. Oakland is
the stumbling block, not Davis. What's he supposed to do? Sit back and
wait to see if Oakland is going to back out of a done deal, leaving him
one year to iron out a multi-faceted, multi-million dollar contract
with a deadline approaching quickly? That would be a very stupid
business move. Davis and the RAIDERS want to come back to Oakland.
Oakland is hee hawing around, well maybe but then again maybe not. I
don't live in the area but I certainly disagree with your claim that
there are only a few diehards left in the area that care about the
RAIDERS. If that is true, how do you explain last year's pre-season
game selling out in a matter of a couple of hours? A few back you also
claimed they didn't always sell out in Oakland. True. But they also had
a sell out streak of something like 13 years running. (I don't remember
the exact number). Finally, your last extraction of my note did not
have your name in it. Why claim you didn't say something that you
werent being accused of in the first place?
HOOT
|
44.193 | Team owners: always looking for something for nothing | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Mar 29 1990 19:56 | 28 |
|
This whole issue is a great example of what happens when people take
sports so seriously that they feel they must defend the local team or
owner against all reason. For me, nothing could be more deliciously
ironic than for the *people* (not the politicians) of Oakland to tell
the Los Angeles Raiders and Al Davis where to stick it. Don't get me
wrong, I don't have anything against Al Davis personally. I was one of
those "whining" Colts' fans, and I'd be just as happy to see Bob Irsay
or Bill Bidwell fall flat on their faces as Al Davis (so far, it looks
like Bidwell is). It would be nice, just once, to see those
disenfranchised "fans" who we all know don't really have a say anymore
in pro sports, become the screwers, instead of the screwees.
Forget those arguments over the impact that a pro sports team has on
the local economy, especially in a diverse recreational area like the
Bay. A study, reported in Sports Illustrated last week, confirmed what
I've believed all along: that while sports events *are* an economic
boon to businesses in the immediate vicinity of the stadium, if the
sports events aren't available, people will generally spend that money
elsewhere in their leisure time. Add the expenses for extra police,
etc., and it's an overrated economic proposition. In the case of
Oakland, it's doubtful that the popularity of the Raiders can make up
the $60 million investment up front, plus whatever number of $55
tickets Al isn't able to sell.
glenn
|
44.194 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | The California RAIDERS | Fri Mar 30 1990 09:36 | 25 |
|
re: Bruce
I allways put the RAIDERS in big letters... I did not edit your reply to
do that... Maybe you did it and didn't know it... hmmmmm
I was in Oakland about 3.5 years ago and it didn't look like much was being
done about the place... I hope that thing's are starting to take on a rebuilding
for all those folk's.... Even went by the old stadium too.....
Come on Bruce , the way you sound in this note is like you don't want to
see the RAIDERS back in Oakland... Afraid that they could take away from the
49ers??? Masses of people crossing the bridge??? When I went to a 49ers game
about 3.5 years ago there were hundred's of people at the 49ers game with
Oakland RAIDERS jackets on, me included!!!! so I don't think that many people
have converted to the 49ers just some bandwangers, there are still true
RAIDER fans in the Bay area......
Monty
|
44.195 | | LUNER::BROOKS | No, idiot ! Not Bush ...BROOKS ! | Fri Mar 30 1990 09:45 | 23 |
| Monty, the Bay Area is my birthplace. One day, I'd love to go back
and live there. And I believe that the Raiders true home is Oakland.
Not LA, Irwindale, West Toyko, Sacramento, or the Sea Of Tranquility.
But there should be limits as to our emphasis on sports. Any deal
with the Raiders should include renovations to O-A Colliseum. Period.
NO city fail-safe ticket buying, no something-for-nothing gimmicks.
Just a nice, solid package that's fair to both sides.
I'm willing to predict that if the people don't beg Al, then he'll
lower his price tag - considerably.
But I'd hate to see the people of Oakland bankrupt themselves to
get the Raiders back - nothing is worth that.
If the Quake proved anything, it should have gotten our priorties
straight about sports and things that *really* matter.
Have they ? I hope so .....
Let Davis twist in the wind ....
Doc
|
44.196 | If this is plan B, what was plan A ? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Apr 09 1990 14:50 | 8 |
| Does anybody know anything about the following plan b players
that the RAIDERS aquired: Ron Burton, LB, Phoenix ; Joe Campbell,
LB, San Diego; George Streeter, DB, Chicago? I've never seen or
heard of these guys in all my life, are they any good? I have heard
of two of the other players the RAIDERS got ( Ron Brown, and Max
Montoya ) they're both pretty good. Also, any news on what's going
on with Marino and Hebert, it's been to quiet.
Carlos
|
44.197 | good backup | HPSRAD::SANTOS | You can't tough this | Mon Apr 09 1990 15:36 | 7 |
|
Ron Burton, LB Pheonix. Going into his 4rd year in the NFL from NC State.
Played two years for Dallas was cut after Cowboys got two linebackers in
the Herschel trade with Minny last October. Strong against the run, big
hitter, real weak on pass coverage. Not a bad MLB, good on special teams.
chuck
|
44.198 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon Apr 09 1990 16:47 | 7 |
|
RE: Marino and Hebert
Miami is saying Marino will stay, unless they get the farm.
New Orleans is saying they haven't, and don't plan to, talk to anyone
about trading Hebert.
|
44.199 | Alzado | COOKIE::SIMON | | Fri Apr 13 1990 09:31 | 6 |
| read in the paper this morning where Lyle Alzado is allegedly coming
out of retirement to be a "part-time pass rusher" and assistant coach.
Hmmm...maybe Davis will next sign George Blanda as a part-time field
goal kicker, and Ken Stabler as a part-time hand-off-quarterback.
The Raiders might go for job sharing.
|
44.200 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | I'm the NRA | Fri Apr 13 1990 14:19 | 12 |
|
> read in the paper this morning where Lyle Alzado is allegedly coming
> out of retirement to be a "part-time pass rusher" and assistant coach.
You gotta stop readin the Inquirer......
either that or Uncle Al has brain damage to let him play....
After the things he said about John, he really pisses me off!!!
Monty
|
44.201 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon Apr 16 1990 12:21 | 13 |
|
Monty,
I heard it also. That was Alzado talking. There is no way you will see
a 41 year old pass rusher in the NFL that hasn't played since 1985.
Couple that with the fact that he was trying to lose weight for his
acting career, i.e. quit doing steroids, I don't see it happening. I do
agree with you that he is a jerk. Right after he retired he admitted to
doing steroids. Now he claims he didn't, bad publicity ya know. He is a
bad actor and out of the limelight so he pulls this BS to get his name
back into the media.
HOOT
|
44.202 | Alzado: 10 sacks and an Oscar in 1991 | COOKIE::SIMON | | Mon Apr 16 1990 15:58 | 10 |
|
re: .-1
>> doing steroids. Now he claims he didn't, bad publicity ya know. He is a
>> bad actor
He is NOT a bad actor; why, he and E.B. the Energizer Rabbit have such
on-screen charisma that I can see an Emmy next year in the commercial
category for both of them.
|
44.203 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Tue Apr 17 1990 08:16 | 5 |
| I heard on the news this morning that the deal between the Raiders and
the City of Oakland may be dead. I didn't hear anymore, so I don't
know the details.
Glenn
|
44.204 | It's daid! | SALEM::RIEU | In search of...Mr Trout! | Tue Apr 17 1990 08:58 | 4 |
| From what the Globe said Sunday, It will lose at the polls. More
people (50,000) signed the petition to put it on the ballot, than
voted for the mayor in the last election.
Denny
|
44.205 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Wimp football rules! | Tue Apr 17 1990 15:44 | 7 |
|
The Mayor of Oakland has given up on the deal. The Raiders said
if it ever went to a ballot, they would cancel the deal. The
petitioners got 30,000 signatures, enough to put it on the ballot.
The Raiders are said to be looking for a new home.
Bruce
|
44.206 | | FRSBEE::BROOKS | The roof is on fire ! ... | Tue Apr 17 1990 18:47 | 9 |
| Al Davis blew it .... I'm willing to bet that other cities will
finally wake up, smell the coffee, and stop giving into the blackmail.
Hopeful prediction : Davis will take the Raiders back to Oakland,
but for much less.
I'm glad to see that the people have their priorties straight. I
love the *Oakland* Raiders as much as anyone, but hell take care
of the schools (the system is out of money) first ...
|
44.208 | | 7983::RIEU | In search of...Mr Trout! | Wed Apr 18 1990 12:02 | 3 |
| Mebbe the raiders should play all road games. We could just call 'em
'Al's Nomads'.
Denny
|
44.209 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Apr 18 1990 12:18 | 9 |
|
I don't think it will really bother the players, if they don't go to
Oakland, too much. They were planning on playing in LA this year
anyway. They are still under contract to play there. I do agree with
you that the home field advantage will be nil in a cavernous stadium
with noone there. I heard that Davis had already given some concessions
to the original Oakland deal by dismissing Oakland's offer of
guarenteed ticket sales. I wouldn't be surprised if he gives in on
several other issues also to complete the deal.
|
44.210 | RAMS are better | COMET::JACKSONTA | Baseball=overrated, BB & FB= real mans sport | Wed Apr 18 1990 16:56 | 5 |
| Gee, I thought the SB was discustingly funny, but this move deal with
the raiders is worse. AS long as Uncle Al controls the team, then
this bs will continue.
Tj
|
44.211 | Hows Fresno sound? | 29637::SALZER | | Wed Apr 18 1990 18:10 | 5 |
| Let Al eat cake. It's probably starting to taste a lot worse than
that though. Irwindale is starting to sound better and better all
the time. Open up Al, here comes a big old spoon full. Hee-hee!
BoB
|
44.212 | Major yes, Rice no | AUNTB::HAAS | same as talking to you | Tue Apr 24 1990 06:57 | 6 |
| The Raiders took Major Harris on the 12th round. Harris was the last of
the eligible juniors drafted.
FWIW, Tony Rice of Notre Dame was not drafted.
TTom
|
44.213 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Wed Apr 25 1990 11:40 | 6 |
| What's the deal on Harris, as far as what kind of player he is
or can be, I don't know to much about him or any of the other
draftees for that matter.
Carlos
|
44.214 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Gea Johnson, you make everythang... | Wed Apr 25 1990 12:10 | 16 |
| Carlos,
Harris' arm was questioned by scouts after tryouts. Many felt it
wasnt of pro-caliber. Also, he and his agent have actively pursued
playing in the Canadien league, and prior to draft-day, it was rumoured
they were close to signing a deal with the British Columbia team
( i heard that on the Canadien broadcast station before the draft...)
So, that no doubt attributed to him falling through the cracks.
Remember, Bo Jackson slipped to what, the 9th round...
According to USA Today, the Raiders draft graded out to a B. They
didn't pick up OL or DB help that then needed. Put emphasis on
boistering pass rush with speedy outside guys. Loaded up on middle
and late round choices.
JD
|
44.215 | Bo knows draft picks | SHALOT::HUNT | A single ping please, Vasily. | Wed Apr 25 1990 12:20 | 10 |
| Bo Jackson was the very *first* player drafted in the 1985 NFL
draft.
Tampa Bay drafted him and he spent the summer playing AA baseball
in Memphis.
I forget how the Raiders got him. Did they draft him in the 9th
round in 1986 ???
Bob Hunt
|
44.216 | | CAM::WAY | Cumberland Mountain #9 | Wed Apr 25 1990 12:22 | 7 |
| � Harris' arm was questioned by scouts after tryouts.
The arm responded well to questions asked of it by the sports writers.
It did hedge a little of some of the practices of the hand, but
that was to be expected.
The legs were not available for comment...
|
44.217 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Child of the Revolutionary Generation | Wed Apr 25 1990 12:58 | 10 |
| Major Harris not having a strong arm ? HAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!
Typical b.s. propaganda by the 'scouts'. Funny, but The Major's
arm looked damned strong to me when I saw him play .... he could
fire a football something like 60 yards flatfooted. And considering
the job he did this year with a less-than-awesome WVU team, he deserved
better .....
Oh well, if Al Davis and crew are paitent, the Raiders may have
gotten an all time Steal Of The Draft ...
|
44.218 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | A. Bunker, George (Wallace, Brooks) | Wed Apr 25 1990 13:18 | 3 |
|
re: -1 See above.........................^
|
44.219 | | REFINE::ASHE | Miss America, USA, Playmate '90,& me | Wed Apr 25 1990 13:33 | 1 |
| What does .217 have to do with .218 except the author?
|
44.220 | | GOMETS::mccarthy | Mike McCarthy MRO4-2/C17 297-4531 | Wed Apr 25 1990 13:41 | 11 |
| I don't think the Raiders will get the chance at Harris. I don't
think he'll settle for 12th round money when the CFL will probably
pay a lot more.
Too bad. I think in a run and shoot, or an attack that that lets
the QB improvise (similar to Cunningham and the Eagles) Harris
could excel.
I hope he gets the chance someday.
Mike
|
44.221 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Gea Johnson, you make everythang... | Wed Apr 25 1990 13:44 | 22 |
| Doc,
I got it wrong - "Harris' passing accuracy and ability to play
pro-style offense were questioned."
Like it or not, but QB's that come out of wishbone and option type
offenses do not get rated as highly as those who play the pro-set.
It was also felt that the Major could have used the extra year because
a weak QB year turned into a pretty decent one with all the juniors
coming out. Teh CFL move was dumb on his agent's part - shouldn't
have revealed it til after the draft. Why pick a guy high when
you know he's close to signing with Canada - and you retain his
rights for 4 years, but after then....
Like it or not, the NFL scouting combines don't look at college
record - they look at ability - and passing accuracy and pro-set
experience are two important factors for QBs. Look at RB Johnny
Bailey, he lasted til the 9th despite rushing for 6,320 career yards,
Duke's Clarkston Hines who set the NCAA career record for TD catches
lasted li the 9th - both are considered too small, as was LB Ned
Bolcar of Notre Dame.
JD
|
44.222 | Major take the money and run. | HPSRAD::SANTOS | m&m's are to hard to peel | Wed Apr 25 1990 13:53 | 9 |
| Doc, The problem with Harris was not his arm strenght but his passing
ablity. He would pass with a different arm motion everytime (side arm,
over the top, held the ball low). All examples of poor coaching. He also
failed real bad the test offered to college qb to find the open receivers.
Hes a great athlete and every team in the NFL would have given him
the chance to develope if they thought he would sign, he stands to
make more money in the CFL.
Chuck
|
44.223 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Le Lo Elway | Wed Apr 25 1990 14:03 | 6 |
| I think Harris will do well in the CFL and in about 2 years want to come
down and play the real game.... The RAIDERS will have his ass tied up for
what about 4 years or so if he wants to come back down......
Monty
|
44.224 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Child of the Revolutionary Generation | Wed Apr 25 1990 16:38 | 26 |
| JD and Monty,
I don't think the Raiders have Harris' rights for 4 years, do they ?
I thought it was one year tops, then he goes back into the draft,
then becomes a free agent, right ?
re .222
Chuck, take a good look at Bernie Kosar - he's the only QB I've
seen with 3 different arm motions during a single attempt. That
is immaterial.
I must agree with you JD, his agent played it stupid. He gave the GM's the
opening they needed to pass on him, costing Major some serious bucks.
And once again, I thought that Major coming out early was not a
good move - this proves it. It will probably cost him big bucks.
re Johnny Bailey,
I'm really disappointed by that. Which team got him ? I don't care
what anybody says, Bailey is a smaller version of Barry Sanders,
and knows how to make people miss. He can flat out RUN !
Doc
|
44.225 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Gea Johnson, you make everythang... | Wed Apr 25 1990 17:01 | 16 |
| Doc,
According to the report in USA today, the Raiders keep his rights
for 4 years IF he signs with the CFL - if not I believe they have
him for a year - unless he makes the team or they trade him, etc.
If he goes to Canada, and he performs well, it may seem like a
brilliant move - because thanks to Warren Moon and Joe Theismann,
there is a precedent.
A lot of juniors make bad decision. There's a local guy - UWash
- a DB named Burkholter or sumthing - he went out early, and said
he expected to go in the 5th-6th round - he wasn't picked. He put
on a brave face, but he was obviously devastated.
JD
|
44.226 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Apr 25 1990 17:02 | 35 |
|
The BIG difference between Harris and Kosar is that Kosar is accurate
and poised. Harris is extremely erratic and gets rattled very easily.
The RAIDERS hold his rights for 4 years IF he signs with Canada. If he
just sits out a year, ala Bo, he goes back into the draft.
I will be VERY surprised if Harris ever plays in the NFL. He is not an
NFL calibre QB. I saw him play a few times and thought he was
incredibly over-rated/over hyped. He is not that good. He tries to be a
one man show. He gets "happy feet", throws it up for grabs regularly
under pressure, and is very inaccurate. The only real plus I see in him
is that he has excellent "athletic ability".
He wasn't a "bad" pick. It was the last round. It was known that he is
looking toward Canada. If by some miracle he turns into a top quality
QB in Canada, the RAIDERS retain his rights for 4 years. They don't
fork out big bucks for a stiff but could get a good player later. Being
the last round they really didn't miss out on anyone. They can now sign
any player not drafted to a free agent contract. All-in-all, I would
say that he was a good 12th round pick.
I think Bo was taken in the 4th round after he sat out a year.
Carlos,
I never heard of Smith, 1st round, either. From what I have heard since
the draft he was a DE @ Arizona. He only weighed something 255 but
built up to a solid 270 now. He is fast and projected as being able to
switch from DE to OLB, ala Townsend. I was happy to see them get Aaron
Wallace in the 2nd round. I have seen him a couple of times and he is a
bigtime hitter. Most of their other picks, I have never heard of. I
will put in the scouting reports when I get them.
HOOT
|
44.227 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Give me hope Johanna | Wed Apr 25 1990 17:22 | 13 |
|
I think it was probably a great pick. A 12th round pick almost
always does nothing anyway. Now they have a chance to get him groomed
in the CFL for a few years (when he wouldn't be playing in the NFL
anyway, he'd be learning the system). Once that is over, they'll
have an idea of whether to sign him or not. No risk at all to the
Raiders.
I believe he is Raiders property until 1 year after his contract
with the CFL expires, unless he goes back into college. It looks
like a good move, a la the Jackson or Walker signings.
Bruce
|
44.228 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Wed Apr 25 1990 17:29 | 13 |
| I saw Harris play live once this season, and he's the type of player
who looks to run first and pass second. I'm not sure how much of
that is due to happy feet.
It is a good, low-risk move for the Raiders.
So many of these guys have such an over-inflated opinion of themselves.
Whether it's an agent telling them to come out for the money, or
pro scouts not being straight with them about their chances, these
guys end up being hurt. The NFL looks like the bad guys when in
reality the league is in a no-win situation.
John
|
44.229 | Nap a Raider again. | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Fri Apr 27 1990 07:58 | 6 |
| The Raiders have "acquired Napolean McCallum from the Chargers for an
undisclosed future drate choice."
Live from Charger Central....
Glenn
|
44.230 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Le Lo Elway | Fri Apr 27 1990 10:23 | 5 |
| Wonder if they will use him as a fill in till Bo get's home....
Monty
|
44.231 | Will they try to trade Marcus ??? | HPSRAD::SANTOS | m&m's are to hard to peel | Fri Apr 27 1990 10:46 | 4 |
|
Is Nap done with his navy duty???
Chuck
|
44.232 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Fri Apr 27 1990 13:01 | 3 |
| Not yet. I think his committment is up in July.
Glenn
|
44.233 | | UPWARD::HEISER | Mr. Potato Head Groove Thing | Fri Apr 27 1990 14:10 | 2 |
| Will the Raiders go after McMahon? He'd be a natural in the silver &
black!
|
44.234 | McMahon is only as good as his team .... | LUNER::BROOKS | Child of the Revolutionary Generation | Fri Apr 27 1990 14:28 | 2 |
| MacMahon is McOverrated ..... keep him ..... stick with Schroeder,
Berulein or Harris
|
44.235 | Besides,his arn is toast. | JOULE::DIGGINS | Boy I wish I had Talant! | Mon Apr 30 1990 14:18 | 6 |
|
McMahon is a stiff.
Steve
|
44.236 | | FSCORE::PAVEZKA | seton ni segassem cinataS | Tue May 01 1990 08:22 | 5 |
| The Raiders have told Major Harris' agent to suspend talks with BC of
the CFL until `certain things' have happened. They have also said not
to worry about 12th-round money.
pete
|
44.237 | try and try again | COMET::JACKSONTA | Play a mans sport | Fri May 04 1990 18:24 | 1 |
| It don't matter, the faiders still need a "quality" qb.
|
44.238 | <Schedules> | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon May 07 1990 12:30 | 2 |
| Anybody know what the pre and regular season schedule looks like?
|
44.239 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon May 07 1990 12:37 | 23 |
| Regular Season (all times Eastern)
Sun 9/9 Denver 4
Sun 9/16 at Seattle 4
Sun 9/23 Pittsburgh 4
Sun 9/30 Chicago 4
Sun 10/7 at Buffalo 730
Sun 10/14 Seattle 4
Sun 10/21 at San Diego 4
Sun 10/28 Open Date
Sun 11/4 at Kansas City 1
Sun 11/11 Green Bay 4
Mon 11/19 at Miami 9
Sun 11/25 Kansas City 4
Sun 12/2 at Denver 4
Mon 12/10 at Detroit 9
Sun 12/16 Cincinnati 4
Sat 12/22 at Minnesota 4
Sun 12/30 San Diego 4
Don't have the preseason schedule.
John
|
44.240 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon May 07 1990 13:43 | 3 |
| Thanks for the schedule , but whats the deal with the open date?
Carlos
|
44.241 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon May 07 1990 13:56 | 6 |
| > whats the deal with the open date?
17 week season this year. Every team has one open date.
py
|
44.242 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon May 07 1990 14:32 | 8 |
| NFC West teams are off the weekend of Sept 30, NFC East, Oct 7;
AFC East, Oct 14; NFC Central, Oct 21; AFC West, Oct 28; AFC Central,
Nov 11 and 5th place teams from last year, Dec 16. 1990 and 1991
have the 16 games played over 17 weeks and the week off between
the Conference Championships and Super Bowl is eliminated; beginning
in 1992, the season will be played over 18 weeks.
John
|
44.243 | should be interesting | CNTROL::CHILDS | and remember always use your elbows | Wed May 09 1990 07:42 | 13 |
|
announced on Arsenio Hall last night, at 41 years old Lyle Alzado
will be attemping a comeback. Says he's been working with some
Russian doctors and trainers who have rebuilt his muscles with
different exercise.
great answer when Arsenio asked why:
"I've got this burning desire still in my stomach, that I love to
kick ass and I still can do it so I'm going"...or something to that
nature......
mike
|
44.244 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Browns Bite Donks 10/8/90 | Wed May 09 1990 11:50 | 7 |
| > Says he's been working with some
> Russian doctors and trainers who have rebuilt his muscles with
> different exercise.
Read this as a new Roid!!!!
|
44.245 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | and remember always use your elbows | Wed May 09 1990 12:04 | 7 |
|
Naw he was saying how they design the exercises to pull the muscle
away from the bone first and then rebuilt it through arobic style
exercises to repair the liasions and tears. Oh and of course he
quaranteed they win a championship with him back....
mike
|
44.246 | We knew he had it all along | 7983::RIEU | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu May 10 1990 07:33 | 11 |
| <<< Note 44.200 by COMET::MONTGOMERY "I'm the NRA" >>>
>> read in the paper this morning where Lyle Alzado is allegedly coming
>> out of retirement to be a "part-time pass rusher" and assistant coach.
> You gotta stop readin the Inquirer......
> either that or Uncle Al has brain damage to let him play....
>Monty
|
44.247 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri May 11 1990 12:47 | 6 |
| It's been no secret to the Raider faithfull. They have known for quite
some time now even though they won't admit it. The man is loosing it.
Al is going to sign Hulk Hogan next week and appoint him as
Director of Player-Personell. Yes indeed!
BoB
|
44.248 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Buzz Blows Bid for Ohio | Fri May 11 1990 14:53 | 14 |
|
>> It's been no secret to the Raider faithfull. They have known for quite
>> some time now even though they won't admit it. The man is loosing it.
hahahahahahahahahaha (tm)
Uncle Al has made some moves in the past that were a bit strange but in
the end those moves have proven to be right on the money!!!!
Of course some moves made by Blevves (ala sideline tony) have proven there
worth... $$$$$$ flushed....
Monty
|
44.250 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Buzz Blows Bid for Ohio | Fri May 11 1990 15:44 | 18 |
|
>> Uncle Al has made some moves in the past that were a bit strange but
>> in the end those moves have proven to be right on the money!!!!
^
|
|
> Like moving the team to LA? |
|
|
he did make lots of this---------
and one other by taking a chance on a Q.B. from an east coast team that
was traded to S.F.
|
44.251 | Losin' it fer shur | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Mon May 14 1990 09:03 | 7 |
| Here's a little tidbit out of yesterdays Globe:
The hottest rumor circulating around some NFL circles is that the
raiders mistakenly drafted Arizona defensive end Anthony Smith in the
belief it was his teammate, Pats top choice Chris Singleton, rather
than Smith who had had drug problems.
Denny
|
44.252 | Inquiring Minds Want to Know | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Most Heinous, Dude !!! | Mon May 14 1990 10:59 | 1 |
| What kind of drug problem does or did Anthony Smith have???
|
44.253 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Buzz Blows Bid for Ohio | Mon May 14 1990 11:12 | 5 |
| Has anyone heard the talk going on about Williams going to the RAIDERS???
Mnty
|
44.254 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Mon May 14 1990 11:45 | 12 |
| Monty, do you mean Doug Williams? I did read something about that last
week. Maybe he and Schroeder will again compete for a backup spot.
IMHO, if the Raiders don't keep Beurlein in the starters job, they're
stupid.
But I tell you what I DO like....the rise, once again, to prominence of
the AFC West....soon to again be the best division in football.
Raiders improving, Seahawks maybe falling, Broncos the same, Chargers
moving up, and KC looking tough. Go AFC West.
Glenn
|
44.255 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Most Heinous, Dude !!! | Mon May 14 1990 12:00 | 8 |
| If they're gonna go after experienced QB's I think they
would do good to sign McMahon, rather than Williams, although
he's got a big mouth and they're both injury prone, IMO he's
better than Williams. But rather than going after QB's they
should work with what they've got in Beurlein, Schroeder, and
Harris and concentrate on filling other more needed positions.
Carlos
|
44.256 | They blew the 1st rounder | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | I will not instigate revolution. | Mon May 14 1990 12:01 | 10 |
| >The hottest rumor circulating around some NFL circles is that the
>raiders mistakenly drafted Arizona defensive end Anthony Smith in the
>belief it was his teammate, Pats top choice Chris Singleton, rather
>than Smith who had had drug problems.
Probably why most writers who rate how each team did in the draft place
the Raiders dead last. Something like 3 of the 4 ratings I saw had the
Raiders there, and the 4th wasn't too hot a grade either.
Dan
|
44.257 | | IAMOK::AHEARN | Rams vs. Bengals in SB XXV | Mon May 14 1990 12:03 | 8 |
| From what I've heard, they haven't identified the drug that the
Raiders' draft pick is on...but they have determined beyond a shadow of
a doubt that HE SWEATS TOO MUCH!!!!
Schlep hip hpos,
Nelly
|
44.258 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Buzz Blows Bid for Ohio | Mon May 14 1990 13:35 | 23 |
|
> Monty, do you mean Doug Williams? I did read something about that last
> week. Maybe he and Schroeder will again compete for a backup spot.
Yeah , Doug... Afriend told me yesterday that he heard the rumor
> IMHO, if the Raiders don't keep Beurlein in the starters job, they're
> stupid.
I agree 100% Glenn............
> But I tell you what I DO like....the rise, once again, to prominence of
> the AFC West....soon to again be the best division in football.
> Raiders improving, Seahawks maybe falling, Broncos the same, Chargers
> moving up, and KC looking tough. Go AFC West.
Watch out for K.C. in the next few years... The Chargers are turning their
system around and will be a big contender... The donk's are going down the
turlet!!!!!
Monty
|
44.259 | Aw SHADDUP | GENRAL::WADE | Go Broons! | Mon May 14 1990 14:24 | 1 |
|
|
44.260 | Don'k's only spinning | RSST6::RIGGEN | Burley from biking | Mon May 14 1990 14:35 | 6 |
| >>>The donk's are going down the turlet!!!!!
Monty, The Donk's are only swirling at this time. The SEAchicken's
have been flushed.
Jeff
|
44.261 | startin' already!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Play a mans sport | Mon May 14 1990 15:11 | 4 |
| Look for the raiders to finish last in the division this year. Too
much competition for 'em.
Tim
|
44.262 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon May 14 1990 16:10 | 15 |
|
Smith was a a street gang when he was a kid, ala several other NFL
players that became stars (Alzado is the first to come to mind). I
forget the whole story, rather interesting, but I just got their draft
report but haven't had a chance to read it yet. I'll try to remember to
put it in tomorrow.
Dan,
The reports I have read are quite different from your claims. They got
a great pass rusher (in college anyway) in Smith and Aaron Wallace, an
All-American LB that was rated very high by everyone and is a need
position. Certainly not like that stiff Lageman (sp?).
HOOT
|
44.263 | Hey, I'm not a fan. I'm only objective | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | I will not instigate revolution. | Tue May 15 1990 12:41 | 27 |
| >The reports I have read are quite different from your claims. They got
>a great pass rusher (in college anyway) in Smith and Aaron Wallace, an
>All-American LB that was rated very high by everyone and is a need
>position. Certainly not like that stiff Lageman (sp?).
My claims come from well-published local and national publications such
as The National and The Boston Globe, as well as media experts such as
Mike Francessa.
Smith was much worse that "in a street gang as a kid". His drug
problems are very recent. He attended 3 different colleges, which says
a lot about his stability.
Lagaman was rated as the 5th best NFL rookie last year. It was said by
a Raider front office man that he was very disappointed when the Jets
took him, as the Raiders were planning to take him soon. I'm sure if
he had been picked by the Raiders, you wouldn't refer to him as a
stiff.
Wallace appears to be a good pick for the second round, but I read he
needs a lot of seaoning. Don't expect immediate impact.
Unless Smith surprises everyone, he was a bad pick for the Raiders.
That is why nearly every publication had the Raiders at or near the
bottom of draft success.
Dan
|
44.264 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Buzz Blows Bid for Ohio | Tue May 15 1990 12:53 | 17 |
|
> My claims come from well-published local and national publications such
> as The National and The Boston Globe, as well as media experts such as
> Mike Francessa.
Should I laugh now or latter!! ;^)
>Smith was much worse that "in a street gang as a kid". His drug
> problems are very recent. He attended 3 different colleges, which says
> a lot about his stability.
Remember that the RAIDERS have the history of taking guy's like this
and making them into great players and good people....
Monty
|
44.265 | laugh when you want | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | I will not instigate revolution. | Tue May 15 1990 13:13 | 10 |
| >Remember that the RAIDERS have the history of taking guy's like this
>and making them into great players and good people....
There is something to that. But that's a big risk to take on a guy
with a high draft pick. There's a lot of teams who wouldn't have taken
Smith with any pick - they want no part of him. I also think that with
the problems this kid as head, he's not your typical Raider loose
cannon project.
Dan
|
44.266 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Tue May 15 1990 15:16 | 32 |
|
And now for something completely different, a little truth...
Smith did not go to three colleges. He went to Alabama for 3 years and
Arizona 1 year. Your claims that his gang/drug activity was recent is
so far out in left field the Bo Jackson couldn't slam one that far. The
truth of the matter is, he was in a gang in Jr. High. A football coach
saw him and talked him into playing. His gang/drug activities stopped
at that point. Betcha didn't know he plans on being a federal probation
officer after his football career is over. When Art Shell was asked why
they took Smith with their first pick since they have Long, Townsend,
Wise, Davis, Golic and Pickel; Shell replied that they take who they
feel is the best player available regardless of position and that they
like his attitude and work ethic.
Pardon me folks for repeating the rebuff of the MU about Lagaman but
here goes, again. The RAIDERS did not have a 1st round pick. They
made a trade with Dallas who had the 1st pick in the 2nd round to get
the guy they wanted, Steve Wisniewski, not Lagaman. From what I had
read, no other team projected Lagaman higher than a mid round pick,
except the Jets. Claiming he was the 5th best rookie last year is a
total joke. Just because he started for the worst team in the AFC
doesn't make him the 5th best rookie.
Aaron Wallace was considered one of the best pass rushers in college
ball over his career at Texas A&M. These accolades are backed up by the
fact that he broke Jacob Green's school career sack record by 5 sacks,
42 to 37.
HOOT
|
44.267 | | FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOS | | Wed May 16 1990 09:21 | 6 |
| Being from Texas I agree with your assesment of Aaron Wallace, but
he tapered off after the season was over thinking he had it made.
His stock dropped considerably in the eyes of the scouts when he
decided to eat his way out of a top ten pick. His attitude made
many teams turn away from him, but under the Raider system this
guy will become a player.
|
44.268 | Why he's a regular choir boy! Maybe it was Singleton on drugs | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | I will not instigate revolution. | Wed May 16 1990 13:26 | 32 |
| >And now for something completely different, a little truth...
Different for you? Certainly not for me.
>Betcha didn't know he plans on being a federal probation
>officer after his football career is over.
Why I had no idea! He can now marry my sister. I'm sure these future
plans means he's a great football player so why not take him in the
first round when he'll still be there the next day?
>The RAIDERS did not have a 1st round pick. They
>made a trade with Dallas who had the 1st pick in the 2nd round to get
>the guy they wanted
Hoot, maybe you should get in touch with the Raiders front office,
because they are the ones who are telling a different story. I'm just
repeating it for your benefit. Perhaps the two of you can agree on a
new party line, but they might be a little busy trying to find some
fans they can bilk at the moment.
>Claiming he [Lageman] was the 5th best rookie last year is a
>total joke. Just because he started for the worst team in the AFC
>doesn't make him the 5th best rookie.
And a good joke at that because all kinds of people are repeating it,
most of whom know what they are talking about. BTW, a good first round
pick is expected to make an immediate impact. I don't see your logic
in critisizing Jeff for that.
Dan
|
44.269 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Most Heinous, Dude !!! | Thu May 17 1990 09:53 | 4 |
| Major Harris and the British Columbia Lions said Wednesday,
they are close to signing a contract that would bring the former
West Virginia QB to the CFL.
Carlos
|
44.270 | | FSCORE::PAVEZKA | seton ni segassem cinataS | Thu May 17 1990 12:23 | 5 |
| Harris signed a 2 year deal with the Lions for $75K/ year and a $30K
signing bonus. Mark Gastineau is going to try a comeback with the
Lions as well.
pete
|
44.271 | | REFINE::ASHE | I gotta be me... | Thu May 17 1990 12:26 | 2 |
| Gastineau? Oh, wait, BC Lions, had me worried Detroit ain't no
place for wimps!!!
|
44.272 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Junkfergnotener | Fri May 18 1990 07:27 | 7 |
| The Pittsburgh Gladiators of the indoor football debacle have said they
will match any offer made in Canada to Harris and Harris has said he
will play for the Gladiators if they do match offers.
JaKe
|
44.273 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon May 21 1990 11:56 | 5 |
|
Dan,
Just who are these informed sources of yours that you claim named
Lagaman the 5th best rookie last year? I haven't heard that from
anyone except you. Would it possibly be a New York paper?
|
44.274 | | TIPTOP::CSSST6 | | Mon May 21 1990 11:57 | 5 |
| Hoot,
I was one of those sources. Why do you ask?
JoJ
|
44.275 | I'd say they are reasonably informed | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | I will not instigate revolution. | Mon May 21 1990 12:18 | 15 |
| >Just who are these informed sources of yours that you claim named
>Lagaman the 5th best rookie last year? I haven't heard that from
>anyone except you. Would it possibly be a New York paper?
It's within the realm of possibility, but, no, it's not a NY paper.
The two sources that I know are Bobby Beathard, now the GM of the San
Diego Chargers and one of the most respected minds in football, and Hub
Arkish (he just included Lagamen in his top 7 - no rankings after
Sanders) who knows more about pro football than anyone I've ever heard.
He's the editor of Pro Football Weekly.
I know neither of these sources are Al Davis, but they just might know
what they are talking about anyway.
Dan
|
44.276 | Clearly... | CAM::WAY | Go ask Alice, when she's ten feet tall | Mon May 21 1990 12:21 | 0 |
44.277 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Lakers to the Undertakers | Mon May 21 1990 12:26 | 9 |
| >Bobby Beathard
Take what he say's with a grain of salt.... He's been know to come
up with some whoppers in the past...
|
44.278 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | Go get'em, Mike | Mon May 21 1990 13:08 | 9 |
|
Hoot, It was JOJ's Jets Newsletter. Do you doubt the source? 8^)
The Oakland Trib just conducted a poll of the people of Oakland
to find out if they wanted the RAiders back. It came out
overwhelmingly negative. It seems the people are tired of all the
crap about they are back/no they aren't.
Bruce
|
44.279 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon May 21 1990 17:16 | 11 |
|
I'm not surprised about the poll results, Bruce. The old fans got
excited about the return and then get the rug pulled out from under
them.
Ah yes, Bobby Beathard of the "insiders" fame, or should that be shame?
He would come up with some wild trade or other "inside" info every
week. Did any of it ever actually happen? I don't think so.
HOOT
|
44.280 | When in doubt, play Invent a Strawman | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | I will not instigate revolution. | Tue May 22 1990 09:27 | 16 |
| >Ah yes, Bobby Beathard of the "insiders" fame, or should that be shame?
>He would come up with some wild trade or other "inside" info every
>week. Did any of it ever actually happen? I don't think so.
Such as?
I wonder why the Chargers hired him, and why he was pursued by so many
teams to be the head of the organization. I mean, the Hoot and Monty
Raider Defense Team say the guy "tells whoppers" and "comes up with...
wild trades".
Is Beathard really just out of place in the front office of an NFL
team? Or does his post-season evaluation of the NFL rookies carry a
lot of weight?
Dan
|
44.281 | He did fairly well in Washington.... | GENRAL::WADE | Go Broons! | Tue May 22 1990 09:47 | 1 |
|
|
44.282 | Glad he's gone from DC | SHALOT::HUNT | Heartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay Gin | Tue May 22 1990 10:52 | 6 |
| Beathard did more than "fairly well" with the Deadskins. That man
built the Skins into a very tough team.
Joe Gibbs was very lucky to have Beathard acquiring players for him.
Bob Hunt
|
44.283 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue May 22 1990 10:59 | 9 |
| Bobby Beathard has always been one of the most highly respected
scouts/personnel directors/general managers in the NFL. I admire
him not only because he's done a good job, but he did it in a way
where it didn't become his whole life. He has interests outside
the game, he didn't demand that his scouts spend the entire Fall
on the road and he's got a good sense of humor. No reason to bash
him, other than envy.
John
|
44.284 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Bosco puts whee in your Knee... | Tue May 22 1990 11:02 | 5 |
| Beathard is a fantastic gm, personnel director, and judge of talent.
He was a horrible analyst for football. It wasn't his element,
and it was a stupid concept. Glad to see he got back to doing what
he does best.
JD
|
44.285 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | a smile that just melts a man..tyler | Tue May 22 1990 11:15 | 4 |
| plus, hes a runner, which makes him a great guy. :)
dinz
|
44.286 | Just a little Raid bashing. | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri May 25 1990 21:32 | 26 |
| Myth: Once a Raider always a Raider.
Fact: Really? Tell that to Madden or Flores. They can convince
otherwise.
Myth: The Raiders have the ability to take cast offs and misfits
and turn them into winners.
Fact: REally now? When was the last time that happened? Sometime
early in the last decade?
Myth: The Raiders are opportunists.
Fact: The Raiders use to be opportunists. Their recent season records
speak clearly enough.
Myth: The Raiders have a 'Commitment to Excellence'.
Fact: See recent records and playoff showings. That's some committment.
Myth: The Raiders are only a player or 2 from the bowl.
Fact: The Raiders are only a player or 2 from a better than .500
season.
Myth: Al Davis is a football genius.
Fact: Al Davis needs to step up, aside or wherever he can to get out
of the way. His day is past. Personally, I hope he stays.
BoB
|
44.287 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Tue May 29 1990 12:41 | 3 |
| A sportswriter from Pittsburgh was quoted in a recent issue of Austin
paper. He really ripped into the Raiders for bringing back Lyle
Alzado.
|
44.288 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Tue May 29 1990 15:12 | 3 |
|
If .286 was an attempt to get a rise out of someone, I suggest going
back to the drawing board. That was pathetically weak.
|
44.289 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | KI, CC, EM, SS, are hang'in | Tue May 29 1990 16:15 | 1 |
| Sounded kinda true 'tho.
|
44.290 | Ouch | COMET::JACKSONTA | Play a mans sport | Tue May 29 1990 17:57 | 2 |
| ditto that!!
Tj
|
44.291 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Blaqu� Jacqu� Shellaqu� | Wed May 30 1990 16:54 | 24 |
|
> FACT: Once a RAIDER always a RAIDER.
> MYTH: Really? Tell that to Madden or Flores. They can convince
otherwise.
FACT: They're both still RAIDERS at heart, unfortunately
they probably advanced as far as they could within
the RAIDER orginization and moved on to bigger and
better careers.
> FACT: The RAIDERS have the ability to take cast offs and misfits
and turn them into winners.
> MYTH: Really now? When was the last time that happened?
FACT: Sadly, it seems as though they've lost this great ability,
ex: No matter how hard they tried they just couldn't
reshape that loser Shanahan into a winning coach in the
NFL so they sent him back where he came from.
To close to quiting time to continue,maybe later though.
Carlos
|
44.292 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Blowin whin's again, film at 10 | Thu May 31 1990 13:01 | 40 |
| I'll help Carlos....
> Myth: The Raiders are opportunists.
> Fact: The Raiders use to be opportunists. Their recent season records
> speak clearly enough.
They just went thru another coach change, watch for them to be back
on top!!!!
> Myth: The Raiders have a 'Commitment to Excellence'.
> Fact: See recent records and playoff showings. That's some committment.
Who still holds the winning percentage for a pro team in any
sports??? not to be passed soon!!!
That Commitment also has got them 3 rings on their fingers!!!
> Myth: The Raiders are only a player or 2 from the bowl.
> Fact: The Raiders are only a player or 2 from a better than .500
> season.
That not a myth, watch what happens this season....
> Myth: Al Davis is a football genius.
> Fact: Al Davis needs to step up, aside or wherever he can to get out
> of the way. His day is past. Personally, I hope he stays.
He has been voted for induction into the hall of fame and will
make it in the next go around!! They don't let wana-bees into the
hall!! The NFL would not be where it's at today with out this
man!!!!!
Any more trash to spew???
Monty
|
44.293 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu May 31 1990 13:06 | 8 |
| > The Raiders are only a player or 2 from a better than .500
> season.
With the extra wild card added this year, a "just better than .500
season" may be enough to get into the playoffs...
py
|
44.295 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Blowin whin's again, film at 10 | Thu May 31 1990 13:38 | 12 |
| > Yeah, where's my $20.00 you FFF'in welch? You spew your trash,
> Steven
come over to the FCC site some day and i'll have it for you....
just keep your eye on the trees because we shoot donk fan's comin up the
road and then expose them to RAIDER films over here... We really don't test
for EMI/RFI this is the nerve center for re-education for those that favor
orange... ;^)
|
44.296 | | CAM::WAY | It was a stanky thang | Thu May 31 1990 14:04 | 5 |
| You've got to tell them... you've got to tell them...
Solyent Orange is Donk's fans...Solyent Orange is Donk's fans!!
Tell them.....
|
44.298 | Laugh of the day | COMET::JACKSONTA | Play a mans sport | Thu May 31 1990 16:50 | 5 |
| Davis into the HOF? Thats a joke, so this means that he will
probably get in. What did he do that so spectacular besides waisting
tax $$$$????
Tim
|
44.299 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Passes everthing but a gas station | Thu May 31 1990 16:59 | 15 |
| Tim,
Al Davis, despite his detractors, has been one of the most important
figures in the history of professional sports. He was the commissioner
of the AFL, and is widely viewed as one of the people most responsible
for the AFL/NFL merger (though Pete and the boys tried to cover
it up, as much as possible). Davis was instrumental in the growth
of the old AFL, and despite the howls of Broncos fans, and others,
has been the owner of one of the most successful franchises in the
AFL, AFC, and NFL, a franchise that has won 3 super bowls.
While I haven't been too crazy about AL's recent dealings with moving
the team, I can't argue with his contributions to pro football.
JD
|
44.300 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu May 31 1990 17:12 | 13 |
| The Raiders no longer have the all-time winning percentage in pro
sports. That honor belongs to the Boston Celtics. I think the
Canadiens and Yankees are close, the Lakers are close but I don't
have all the data I need to figure them out.
The Raiders through 1989 are 285-171-11 for a percent of .622.
Not including playoffs, the Celtics through this season were 2169-1226
for a percentage of .639. If playoffs are included, they are 2427-1399
for a percentage of .634.
JD, I agree with you about Al Davis.
John
|
44.301 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Jun 01 1990 10:43 | 2 |
| ...so there!!
Denny
|
44.302 | Dean's % much higher. Over .700! | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jun 01 1990 11:27 | 0 |
44.303 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Jun 01 1990 11:57 | 7 |
| The only other teams above .600 are the Canadiens and Lakers, both
around .610. The only other team close is the Yankees, around .575.
Cain't figure the Habs, Lakers and Yanks out exactly, since I don't
have the last 3 years season records, but I don't think it matters
much.
John
|
44.304 | Al's SB % is .750 ! Dean's ??? | FRSBEE::BROOKS | By Any Means Neccessary - Any At All | Fri Jun 01 1990 12:05 | 6 |
| re .302
Al has won 3 Super Bowls and a AFL title. Dean has 1 championship
(barely), and a host of Excellent Losses (tm)
Nuff said !
|
44.305 | Bill Fischer greatest coach ever!? 1.000% in F4's | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jun 01 1990 12:19 | 1 |
|
|
44.306 | I'm out of here!!!! | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Two days till Freedom | Thu Jun 07 1990 09:29 | 34 |
| Well I guess this is as good a place as any!!!
I'm leavin DEC, yes folk's I took the buyout right after I got a call From
Uncle AL to work for the RAIDERS... Special Asst. in charge of Lunatics and
converting Donk's fan's to Americas Team!!! ;^)
I will miss you guy's!! That's about the only thing I'll miss about this
place.... I'll keep in touch every now and then thru some other noters when
football season comes around... If any of you ever get to Colorado you can
find me at the Green Mountain Falls Fire Dept. about 25 miles from CX0...
I have a chance at a job at another Fire Dept. as a full timer and won't find
out for about a month...
So, Remember me when the RAIDERS beat your team and keep those Donk fans
inline!!!
Later Monty
P.S. There's a rumor that another RAIDERS fan is leaving us too!!!
Soory Carlos , you might be the only one left..
One other P.S.--- I want to thank Mr. Hendry for all that he has done with
giving us the fact's and stat's....
Thank's John!!!!!
Monty
|
44.307 | enjoy the hunting | CNTROL::CHILDS | Eat Me, Beat Me, C'mon Mistreat ME | Thu Jun 07 1990 09:37 | 7 |
|
Good luck Monty, I'm going to miss your unobjective analysis this football
season... ;^) I'll try to pick up the slack and keep the donk fans inline...
;^)
mike
|
44.308 | | POGO::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Thu Jun 07 1990 09:42 | 4 |
| Hope the job works out for you, Monty. I'll keep an eye out
along Ute Pass for a car plastered with FAIDER stickers.
Cowboy
|
44.309 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Jun 07 1990 10:04 | 5 |
| You're welcome Monty. Seriously, good luck and we'll miss you.
If you ever have any Raiders questions or any other things that
come up, relay them through Hoot and I'll be happy to answer them.
John
|
44.310 | Good luck! | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Jun 07 1990 10:12 | 4 |
| Hoot(?) may also be leaving? Oh no! This files gonna be in trouble if
that's the case!
H�wk, stayin' put....
|
44.311 | | GENRAL::WADE | Fear the govt. that fears your guns! | Thu Jun 07 1990 10:41 | 11 |
| Well MonteQue,
It's been real.....it's been fun.....AND it's been real fun
bashing with you. Hold on to your burgers n buds! Hopefully
them firepersons can get you converted from the dark side to
a Donk fan. We could use another completely objective fan
like yerself... :^)
Adios..........
Claybone
|
44.312 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Ya gotta aggregate yer SLOF's, man | Thu Jun 07 1990 10:44 | 6 |
|
Best of luck and all that, Monty. Hope the full-time fireman thing
pans out, hoser.
Dickster
|
44.313 | | JULIET::MAY_BR | QUIET!! | Thu Jun 07 1990 10:51 | 6 |
|
Hoot and Monty leaving at the same time? Hmmmmm.
Godd luck.
Bruce
|
44.314 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | He lives in Mojave in a Winnebago | Thu Jun 07 1990 10:57 | 3 |
| Rotsa ruck, Monty, and keep the anti's in line.
Mark.
|
44.315 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Jun 07 1990 10:58 | 3 |
| Good Luck Monty!
Toad's leaving too.
Denny
|
44.317 | C ya, Bye, Adios, Later Dude! Peace, Monty. | CRBOSS::DERRY | | Thu Jun 07 1990 11:00 | 1 |
|
|
44.318 | | TOPDWN::METZGER | Don't have a cow man... | Thu Jun 07 1990 11:07 | 11 |
|
Later MOnty...
I'll miss talking knowlegeable 'merican football with ya...
Too many anti-donks leaving ........
Metz
|
44.319 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Madonna and ASICS.. A WINNING COMBO | Thu Jun 07 1990 11:09 | 4 |
| good luck monty..
dinz
|
44.320 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Two days till Freedom | Thu Jun 07 1990 11:13 | 10 |
| Oh Yeah!!!
Does anyone want to buy an FFL team????
The Colorado Sportsters are up for sale real cheap....
Division D FFL.....
Monty
|
44.321 | | CAM::WAY | Bloomfield Brew Crew | Thu Jun 07 1990 11:22 | 33 |
| Monty --
Best of luck to you. Take good care.
There's not one person in the entire world who has eaten smoke
that doesn't feel at one time or another that they want to do
it full time. I am envious!
A couple of points to remember:
1. When rescuing pretty female victims,
encourage them to let you do mouth-to-mouth
as that will allow you to keep your skills
current.
2. When you're up on the aerial, always try
to spit on the Chief's head...during the
confusion at a fire, he'll never know it
was you, and you'll feel good.
3. Ventilate a lot....it's easy work, and it
looks cool to people watching.
4. There are worse things to do in life than
hump hose.
5. Finally, the bestest tool in the whole world
for ventilation is a CHAINSAW!!!!!
Take care, dude,
'Saw
|
44.322 | | REFINE::ASHE | Never trust a big butt & a smile | Thu Jun 07 1990 11:30 | 5 |
| Later Mont-dude... like have a most excellent adventure chasing
fires, man, say hi to that bodacious Darryl Hannah for me... whoops,
wrong movie, gotta keep that nose clean...
-Walt
|
44.323 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Ya gotta aggregate yer SLOF's, man | Thu Jun 07 1990 11:55 | 3 |
|
And don't forget to clean your nozzle, too.
|
44.324 | And don't smoke too many butts! | BUILD::MORGAN | | Thu Jun 07 1990 12:14 | 4 |
| Hey Monty, CONGRATS! Hope everything works out with the new job. This
is depressing though, when hearing the anti's are bailing out.
Steve
|
44.325 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | L.A. Dodgers '88 WORLD CHAMPIONS | Thu Jun 07 1990 13:13 | 5 |
| Congrats Monty, I just wish you'd have been around when the Rams kick
the paRaiders (tm) out of L.A. and clean up that city once and for all.
the devil dog
|
44.326 | Does Cacti know? | COMET::JACKSONTA | Play a mans sport | Thu Jun 07 1990 14:12 | 5 |
| Its been fun bashing at/with ya Monty. Hope we can get you out to
the field and play some ball again. Good luck, and don't feel to bad
about being a closet donk fan ^^^.
Tim
|
44.327 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Jun 07 1990 14:59 | 12 |
|
Yep, I also got a new transmission (or something like that) and can't
turn down the buyout. I don't have an exact date for the final day yet,
sometime at the end of this month. Can't bitch. It's been a great 13
years. Because of DEC, I have had the opportunity to see some beautiful
country in New England and Colorado. I don't have anything definately
lined up yet, one definate possibility though. I will be around here
for a couple more weeks. Then I hope to take some time to go fishin'
and see if I can get my limit of golfs.
HOOT
|
44.328 | | POGO::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:02 | 4 |
| Good luck out in the real world, HOOT. Too bad you won't be
here for the Donks season. ha
Cowboy
|
44.329 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | He lives in Mojave in a Winnebago | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:15 | 8 |
| Hoot, it was a pleasure to know ya. Best of luck in all your
endeavors. If you mail me your home number, I'll look you up when
I come back out to Colorado (probably in July). Maybe we can do
some fishin'.
Keep your lines tight and your powder dry.
Mark.
|
44.330 | | GENRAL::WADE | Fear the govt. that fears your guns! | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:17 | 6 |
| Transition 2, ::sports 0 :^(
Hate to see you go Hooter.....who's gonna report on the antics
of Gerald Perry now?
Claybone
|
44.331 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A knife,a fork,a bottle & a cork | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:22 | 4 |
| Well, I guess I'm the only Raider fan left, HOOT, MOnty, GOod luck
and I'll take up the slack preaching AL's word to the infidels.
JD
|
44.332 | | CAM::WAY | Bloomfield Brew Crew | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:26 | 13 |
| � Transition 2, ::sports 0 :^(
Quite a soccer-like score there, Claybone...
HOOT, gonna miss ya dude. You and Monty were two of the things that
made this file bearable during football season with all the donking,
and yapping....
If you ever get out this way, don't forget to look the Chainsaw
up. We'll do some manly things, and hoist a few homebrews!
'Saw
|
44.333 | Must be a Donk fan behind this. :-) | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | Wham Bam thank ya ma'am! | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:36 | 10 |
|
Later dayz and good luck HOOT and Monty. Looks like JD, myself,
and the rest of the RAIDER faithful will have to pick up the slack.
Bashing the Donks just won't be the same without you guys.
Glen J.
|
44.334 | They're dropping like flies! | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | Say, who's the barber here? | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:37 | 4 |
| You guys take care. It was a pleasure meeting you. If/when I make it
there again, I'll make sure Cactus Jack rounds you guys up.
Dan
|
44.335 | Et tu, Hoot? | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Ya gotta aggregate yer SLOF's, man | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:41 | 5 |
|
All the best, Hoot. Happy hunting.
Dickster
|
44.337 | | UPWARD::HEISER | child of the blues | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:47 | 5 |
| Hoot, Monty, best of luck to both of you.
PNO has lost half of its population to the $$$.
Mike
|
44.338 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Thu Jun 07 1990 15:49 | 10 |
|
If any of you make it out this way, I'm listed in the Colorado Springs
phone book under David J. Gibson. I plan on sticking around here.
Also, some of you will remember Todd Survil and Herve Church. They are
both taking the buyout. Herve is moving to Portland, Ore. and Todd is
staying here.
HOOT
|
44.339 | | FSHQA2::AWASKOM | | Thu Jun 07 1990 16:02 | 7 |
| Well, damn!
Why is it the buyout always takes the good guys!
Best of luck to both (all?) of you.
A&W
|
44.340 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | WHOA! Death by STEREO! | Thu Jun 07 1990 16:35 | 18 |
| Attention Hoot and the Parrot:
Hey guys.... I was just kiddin' when I said this town wasn't big
enough for the three of us. ( Shheeeesh! )
When the Donks whup the Faiders up side the head (as per usual),
whose corn flakes can I crap in if not yours?
Who else would have the lack of class to try to defend Uncle Al's
(you know, the guy with 666 tatooed on his haid) braindead decisions.
In all seriositicity, I'll miss you guys. Even though we haven't
met yet, stay in contact, through Jack. Are you having a going away at
the Rock or the Dublin House?
Best of Luck, and keep the shiny side up.
Mike JN
|
44.341 | Go get em ! | LUNER::BROOKS | By Any Means Neccessary - Any At All | Thu Jun 07 1990 18:35 | 4 |
| Good luck and best wishes Monty ... I'll help pick up the Raider
Gauntlet .....
BTW, should I tell SPORTS that you are the real Darth Raider ?
|
44.342 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Jun 08 1990 06:49 | 3 |
| Good Luck to you HOOT! We're losing a lot of good people around
here also.
Denny
|
44.343 | An Opinion.... | CAM::WAY | Bloomfield Brew Crew | Fri Jun 08 1990 07:46 | 18 |
| A quick aside not meant to start a rat hole:
I agree wholeheartedly with A&W on the buyout taking
all the good folks.
I've seen more goldbrickers and goof-offs who get shuffled
from project to project, never producing anything, but
still on the payroll. They have it so easy, they'd probably
never take the buyout even if it was offered. Heaven forbid
the company should actually *fire* them for non-productivity!
Yup, all the good ones get away, while the deadwood floats
around clogging up the viaduct.
Thanks for letting me step on the soapbox for a few minutes,
Chainsaw
|
44.344 | | BUILD::MORGAN | | Fri Jun 08 1990 07:56 | 8 |
| See ya Hoot. Never met ya, but I will miss you and the Mont. I'll
look you guys up if I'm ever out there. My wife has quite a bit of
family that live in the Springs. Good luck to ya.
Steve
P.S. - Frank, the buyout seems to be working quite nicely up here in
Maynard.
|
44.345 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | L.A. Dodgers '88 WORLD CHAMPIONS | Fri Jun 08 1990 08:01 | 6 |
| I was gonna start the Hoot and Monty going away party topic but I
didn't figger anyone would show up.
Seriously, if any CS noters wanna go for some brews to wish the dearly
depaarting well, then lets go for it.
|
44.346 | | COMET::MONTGOMERY | Two days till Freedom | Fri Jun 08 1990 10:30 | 19 |
| Saw you slay me (tm)
Those were some great ideas!!! Can't wait to try the one out on the chief!!!
Thank's guy's Will miss the hell out of all of you!! ;^(
Just won't be the same with out login into sports.....
All of you take care!!!
AND REMEMBER THAT THE RAIDERS ARE #1...............
Good luck to all
Monty.....
|
44.347 | | POGO::REED | OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship | Fri Jun 08 1990 10:35 | 4 |
| > AND REMEMBER THAT THE RAIDERS ARE #1...............
Confused to the end, eh Monty?
|
44.348 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Jun 08 1990 12:11 | 10 |
|
'Saw,
People that were rated 1, 4 or 5 were not permitted to go on
transition. I guess the theory was that they didn't want to lose
water walkers or permit managers to dump their dirty laundry, so to
speak, on someone else. They have to deal with their poor performers
instead of just dumping them on someone else.
HOOT
|
44.349 | | CAM::WAY | Bloomfield Brew Crew | Fri Jun 08 1990 12:54 | 9 |
| Thanks HOOT, for the info.
At any rate, it's still too bad we won't have your's and Monty's
unique input in here anymore.
Best of luck, and if I ever get out that way, I'll be sure and
look you up!
'Saw
|
44.350 | byw bye | CNTROL::CHILDS | Eat Me, Beat Me, C'mon Mistreat ME | Fri Jun 08 1990 14:21 | 9 |
|
Good luck Hoot, sorry to see ya go it was fun agreeing with you and
disagreeing with you the last few years. Enjoy your time off and good
luck with the hunt....
on the other stuff perhaps when Digital tighten it's belt again in 91
the 4's and 5's will get the gate without a generous package?
mike
|
44.351 | A sad time for Sports | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Mon Jun 11 1990 06:00 | 21 |
| Geez, this is really depressing. I was out a few days last week,
so I guess I missed giving my farewell to the Parrot.
Hoot, I'm sure you'll be seeing him, so give him my best wishes
please.
As for you, it just won't be the same in here, particularly during
football season. Can you ask Uncle Al to hire-on another Deccie
so we can continue to have inside info? :*)
Really, I'll miss your bullseyes on them Donk fans, especially Jack.
I and other can shoot from afar, but you were able to get right
on him.
Herve, Todd, Monty, Hoot. Wow, this is really hard to believe,
that all of you are leaving in the same timeframe. It's depressing.
So, before I get distracted, I want to wish all of you the very
best in whatever you do and wherever you go.
Lee
|
44.352 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Mon Jun 11 1990 06:40 | 3 |
| According to yesterday's Globe, the raiders are interested in Ken
Sims.
Denny
|
44.353 | It was fun jawing with youse guys. Good luck. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Mon Jun 11 1990 08:47 | 1 |
|
|
44.354 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Mon Jun 11 1990 10:21 | 9 |
|
Will do, Lee. I finally am taking your suggestion from a few years
back. I think I will go into a career of acrobatics. ha ha ha!
RE: Simms
I doubt if he would make the team, unless they traded some people away.
HOOT
|
44.355 | BEWARE THE ENTITY | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Blaqu� Jacqu� Shellaqu� | Mon Jun 11 1990 11:13 | 19 |
|
Although DEC tried to remove these two undaunted RAIDER
fans by offering them the dreaded package .... it's too late..
....infected by radioactive emissions from their CRT's, their
individual spirits have merged into a single 'entity' living
somewhere in virtual memory space .... just waiting and
watching for the Donks to choke against the RAIDERS again only
to emerge in its new form ...... "MOOT".... Arrrghhhhhh!
Seriously though, Hoot you're an inspiration to all, and I'm sure
God will meet your needs. Sorry I missed Monty, I was out last week,
please give him my regards. Not to worry, as you just read the 'entity'
will keep these lost donk fans in place, along with the rest of us
RAIDER faithful. If I'm ever up that way I'll let you buy me a brew,
as it'll probably mean that I took the package too and am looking
for work.
Carlos
|
44.356 | Bye! | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Mon Jun 11 1990 14:01 | 16 |
| Losing Monty & Hoot is like:
(a) A breath of fresh air.
(b) Missing 2 of the Three Stooges.
(c) The final blow for the Raiders contingent.
(d) A paradox for Donk fans....whom now will they scream about.
(e) All of the above.
Best of luck.....it's been fun!
Live from Charger Central.....Glenn
|
44.357 | I think I saw you in ::GRATEFUL | CRBOSS::DERRY | | Tue Jun 12 1990 05:59 | 3 |
| Good luck and enjoy the show... so to speak.
Take care, Hoot!
|
44.358 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Jun 12 1990 06:30 | 4 |
| Oakland mayor Liomel Wilson got hammered in the election lasted week
(17% of the vote). He was a strong supporter of paying the extortion
money to Al Davis.
Denny
|
44.359 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Jun 12 1990 07:19 | 10 |
| In the USA Today , it has the Raiders sending a 4th round pick to
the Rams for Greg Bell.
Is there any news of the Raiders signing Doug Williams?? I know
that they had him in camp a few weeks ago.
Kenn
BTW there are many of us in N.H. that wish we would get offered
the package. Whats the package worth out there??
|
44.360 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Tue Jun 12 1990 16:24 | 16 |
|
Yep, that was me, Karen. Bob was here about a month ago. Played with
Rob Wasserman. Grate show.
Bell for a 4th, huh? That would be a nice insurance policy.
Haven't heard anything concerning Williams. Maybe they could bring him
in to slaughter the donks twice a year. Nah, that's not necessary. The
donks can't beat them anyway.
It's official. My last day is the 25th. Get your licks in while you
still can.
HOOT
|
44.361 | Great time of year to do it!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | Play a mans sport | Tue Jun 12 1990 17:25 | 11 |
| You too HOOT?? Even though I work in the same plant as you and have
never met you, I will miss bashing with/at ya!!
Not to worry, I will still verbally abuse the other Raider
faithfuls, so good luck to ya, and hope you have better luck than I
have had at catchin' that big Mackinaw, Kokanee, or Walleye.
Tim
P.s. Go DONKS!!!!!!
|
44.362 | HOOT, I've got your slack ! | EARRTH::BROOKS | By Any Means Neccessary - Any At All | Tue Jun 12 1990 17:42 | 13 |
| Hoot, who beat Wilson in the mayoral election ? Funny how things
change - he was looking good a while back.
ANyhow, I'm glad that the people of Oakland stood up to Davis, and
showed that they had some sense of priorties.
More importantly, I hope that other cities that are starving for
a NFL team look at Oakland, and learn from it. I see no need to
reward the imcompetence of a Bidwell, Irsay, or Tose by giving them
that kind of extortion money.
Hell, I wish I could tank my job, and have DEC reward me like that
... :-)
|
44.363 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Wed Jun 20 1990 05:49 | 4 |
| The Raiders got Greg Bell for an undisclosed draft choice. A good
move for the Raiders.
Kenn
|
44.364 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Wed Jun 20 1990 11:00 | 7 |
|
Gotta be happy with that, eh Kenn? The original rumor was a 4th round
pick. Must be one of those "depending on what he does, decides what the
Rams get" kind of deals.
HOOT
|
44.365 | HAPPY AS A PIG IN SH*T!!!!! | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Wed Jun 20 1990 15:01 | 5 |
| To get a back of Bells caliber for an undisclosed draft choice sounds
great to me. The Raiders backfield has been in disaray for the last
year and a half maybe Bell can solidify things.
Kenn
|
44.366 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Jun 22 1990 11:40 | 4 |
| Hoot, since Monday is it for you, Best of luck, buddy. Take care
of yourself, and don't buy anything orange-colored!
Lee
|
44.367 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Fri Jun 22 1990 11:56 | 3 |
| Yeah take care HOOT. It was fun *debating* with you. 8^)
/Don
|
44.368 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | The world is a macrocosm of sports | Fri Jun 22 1990 12:03 | 10 |
|
> Yeah take care HOOT. It was fun *debating* with you. 8^)
Hoot,
To you in Col., I think that this can be said for all us
Mass. debaters.
Dickster
|
44.369 | | REFINE::ASHE | You can touch THIS... | Fri Jun 22 1990 12:09 | 3 |
| good luck Hoot-dude...
-Walt
|
44.370 | Good Luck Hootsie | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Jun 22 1990 12:16 | 1 |
|
|
44.371 | No one quite like ya Hoot. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jun 22 1990 13:24 | 10 |
| You'll be missed Hoot. But remember, ...
TWENTY-ONE! TWENTY-ONE! TWENTY-ONE!
;^)
- ACC Chris
|
44.372 | | PTOECA::DEMO | help, i'f falin and i cand ged upp | Fri Jun 22 1990 13:31 | 8 |
| Hoot:::
donet led ure meet lofe an donet git caut wid ure banana waggin'
reegaurds
mi
|
44.373 | I give a HOOT ... Lotsof luck ! | LUNER::BROOKS | Homie The Clown don't play that ! | Fri Jun 22 1990 14:12 | 1 |
|
|
44.374 | | GENRAL::GIBSON | | Fri Jun 22 1990 15:39 | 12 |
|
Thanks allot folks! I don't know if I will be able to get in here
Monday or not. I'll miss ya!
On the RAIDER front...
Tim Brown appeared to be fully recovered from his blown-out knee in
mini-camp. He was running at full speed with no problems.
HOOT
|
44.375 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Always eat ice cream after HOT Chili | Fri Jun 22 1990 15:53 | 6 |
| I may be too late but Good luck and all the best to ya Hoot!!!!
JaKe
|
44.376 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Fri Jun 22 1990 17:51 | 2 |
| Good Luck to ya again HOOT!!
Denny
|
44.377 | The Return of the Evil Empirer!!!!!! | DVF::FORGET | | Thu Jul 05 1990 13:39 | 9 |
|
I heard that Marcus Allen is still under signned. Rookie Camp
opens on the 15th & 22nd the veterans come in.
Mike
|
44.378 | Alzado fighting for roster spot | DECWET::BAKER | Pete Rose is Innocent | Thu Jul 05 1990 18:07 | 14 |
| I read in the last Sports Illustrated a article regarding Lyle's comeing
back to the Raiders. After the spring drills one of the coachs said that
with the uniforms on you could not tell an age difference of the players
out on the field. Before camp opens the coach said that Lyle was propbably
#8 on the list, with only 7 that will make the team. I really have a feeling
that he will make it to at least the #5 spot by the end of camp. Golic was
making fun of the fact that he no longer feels like a old man (33 years)
around the camp, he just looks around the room seeing all the baby faces then
he sees Lyle and gets to feeling good.
We shall see
Steve
|
44.379 | | OOPS::MACGREGOR | | Fri Jul 06 1990 07:14 | 8 |
| Alzado announced his coming out of retirement during an airing of
Arsenio Hall. (This being about four months ago) He said that the
owner (damn I forget his name) invited him to try out for the team.
He claims that he is in better shape now, but not as strong, than
he was during his previous stay. He also plans, along with Art
Shell, to bring back the tough image of the Raiders.
The Wizard
|
44.380 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | One Nation Under GOD !! | Fri Jul 13 1990 15:14 | 16 |
|
With the RAIDERS' ( -vs- Saints) first pre-season
game only three weeks away I gotta say that I can hardly wait.
It's been a long cold winter and I'm getting weak from a virus
caused by an NFL deficiency. I think the Raiders have a good chance
of taking the division title this year. I anticipate Schroeder
to come forth and re-assert himself as a top notch QB this year,
and I agree with Wiz about the rest of the team getting back their
mental and physical toughness brought back by Shell, Otis, and
Alzado (even if he never plays, just having him around the players
might rub off). Don Heineich's (you know, the inventor of the
Heineich Maneuver) '90' preview has the Raiders coming in around
the middle of the pack. But what does he know anyhow ?
Carlos
|
44.381 | | GENRAL::WADE | Daddy,whyaretheangelsbowlingsoloud? | Fri Jul 13 1990 16:19 | 4 |
| What lineup changes, if any, can we expect to see from
the Raiders this year?
Claybone
|
44.382 | here's one | COOKIE::SIMON | | Fri Jul 13 1990 17:28 | 3 |
| re: .-1
You mean aside from Alzado? 8-)
|
44.383 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Mon Jul 16 1990 09:21 | 1 |
| I read that if the Raiders move back to Oakland, the A's will move out.
|
44.384 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | ink a dinka doo, a dinka doo | Mon Jul 16 1990 09:59 | 5 |
| Whwere will the A's go, or should I say, where will Jose tell them
they are allowed to move to....
JD
|
44.385 | I'm Bart Raider, who the Shell are you? | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Mon Jul 16 1990 11:37 | 21 |
| IMO, the two biggest things that hurt the Raiders last year:
Penalties/mistakes. I'm not referring to the occasional penalty for
overaggressive play that any intense team will get, but more the
"mental lapse" kind of error. Like Golic getting called for jumping
offside three times in one drive vs. New England. Or the guy who tried
to field a punt deep in his own end against the Giants and set the
Raiders in a hole for most of the second half. Or numerous overthrows
of open receivers, or drops. Shell did get this team playing with more
intensity after he took over, but they now need to play with more
discipline and better execution.
Inability to win on the road. The Raiders sole win away from LA last
year was at the Meadowlands vs. the Jets.
How far the Raiders go this year will depend on how much they improve
in the above two areas.
py
|
44.386 | A few positive lineup changes | ICS::VPAPIA | | Tue Jul 17 1990 08:14 | 7 |
|
Tim Brown will be back returning punts, Ron Brown is supposed
to move back to defensive back (where he played in college) also
Max Montoya should be starting in the OL.
Vinny
|
44.387 | Other changes | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | One Nation Under GOD !! | Wed Jul 18 1990 17:01 | 19 |
|
You might also see James FitzPatrick, T,(a 300 lb. plan B'er
from San Diego) on the offensive line, Greg Bell, RB from L.A.,
Elvis Patterson, DB, also from San Diego,
Pro Bowl free safety Vann McElroy will also return, he missed most
of last year with a hamstring injury.
Last year the Raiders finished 19th out of 28 in total offense
(9th in rushing and 25th passing) and 10th in total defense (16th
against the rush and 5th against the pass). The return of Tim Brown
should help their hurting passing game a little but they still need
help at QB. The rushing game should be excellent this year with
the addition of Bell. Likewise the return of McElroy should help
the defensive running game considerably as well as the defensive
passing game, and Ron Brown will be given a look at cornerback,
a position he played at Arizona State. Elvis Patterson may also
help in press coverages.
Carlos
|
44.388 | still will be under .500 | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMjustTHEsameASyouIDOtheBESTiCAN | Wed Jul 18 1990 17:39 | 6 |
| Having T. Brown returning punts will help the Faiders, but all the
rest will not.
Also, I thought McElroy was cut last year???
Tim
|
44.389 | No pass rush is the main problem | ICS::VPAPIA | | Thu Jul 19 1990 07:15 | 8 |
|
Ron Brown,Greg Bell and Max Montoya won't help? I find that hard
to believe. Arron Wallace has signed so he should help at LB and also
getting to the QB which if the Raiders don't do you could be right
about being under .500.
Vinny
|
44.390 | | GENRAL::WADE | Daddy,whyaretheangelsbowlingsoloud? | Thu Jul 19 1990 09:53 | 8 |
| Carlos,
Looks like they made some good acquisitions (except Elvis
"Toast" Patterson). Having McElroy back should help them
out too. They still need somebody to *step up* and play
QB.......
Claybone
|
44.391 | | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Thu Jul 19 1990 13:11 | 14 |
| Tim Brown isn't set in the plans for special teams this year. One
of the reasons Ron Brown was probably signed is to replace Brown
on special teams. Greg Bell and Max Montoya were steals! A big key
is if the Raiders can stay healthy this year. Aaron Wallace should
have a good chance at starting for the Raiders at OLB this year.
The division looks to be tight from top to bottom. I look for San
Diego to surprise a lot of people this year. With the exception
of Denver every team in this division has questions at QB.
Heres hoping that the Raiders kick but all year long!!
Kenn
BTW: Schroeder signed a 1 year 1 million dollar contract yesterday.
|
44.392 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | One Nation Under GOD !! | Fri Jul 20 1990 09:13 | 11 |
| Beuerlein and No. 1 draft pick Anthony Smith are already
holdouts. Beuerlein who started 7 games and made $140,000 last
year is seeking something close to the $1 million Jay Schroeder
signed for this week. Marcus Allen and Greg Townsend are also
considered possible holdouts.
I can't believe Schroeder got $1 mill., although I do think
he has the potential to be a great QB, I would have waited until
he performed like a million dollar player first. As for Beurerlein,
he's dreaming.
Carlos
|
44.393 | | FRSBEE::BROOKS | Drexler,ZinaGarrison,DrM | Fri Jul 20 1990 15:54 | 5 |
| What happened with the Phantom Raider Doug Williams ? Last I heard,
the Raiders asked him to come to a try-out, he was very impresssive
(according to Art Shell), and I've heard nothing since.
I bet Schroeder would *love* that .... :-)
|
44.394 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Mon Jul 23 1990 06:56 | 4 |
| Remember Nonty telling us Uncle Al would have to be brain dead to
have Alzado in camp? Well, guess who's in camp! Someone remind the
parrot of this if you see him.
Denny
|
44.395 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Impeach Jim Florio...NOW! | Mon Jul 23 1990 08:00 | 4 |
| What good would "One Game Doug" Williams do for the Faiders? Face it
Doc, he's not worthy of an NFL starting job.
JoJ
|
44.396 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | One Nation Under GOD !! | Mon Jul 23 1990 08:45 | 5 |
| Seems to me that the Raiders picked up an old washed out QB
not to long ago, that ended up taking them to the Superbowl and
winning it.
Carlos
|
44.397 | Or shall we call him Kenny The Quiche ? | EARRTH::BROOKS | I could drop Tyson like a bad habit! | Mon Jul 23 1990 09:02 | 5 |
| Wardle, if Doug is One Game .... what the hell is K-K-Kenny ?
"No Show" O'Brian ???
HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA !!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
44.398 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | I could drop Tyson like a bad habit! | Mon Jul 23 1990 09:03 | 5 |
| Carlos .... that QB won not one, but TWO SB's for the Raiders ....
And let's not forget how the Raiders picked up a QB who was considered
washed up by the Oilers at the age of 37 ... fella by the name of
Blanda .....
|
44.399 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Impeach Jim Florio...NOW! | Mon Jul 23 1990 10:53 | 16 |
| While it's true that Plunket and Blanda did the job for the Raiders,
it's no reason to assume that One_Game_Doug can do the same.
He had a great SB, but then again, so did Phil Simms. I'd say Simms is
the better of the two based on reasonable consistency over the past few
years. Williams has never proven that he can win consistently....
re: O'Brien
Hey Doc, what does Kenny have to do with this? Why is it that whenever
you can't back up your argument you change the subject?
I'm still waiting for you to tell me the NFL scouts were wrong about
Harris....
JoJ
|
44.400 | Poor 'ol Jay | NSDC::SIMPSON | File Under 'Common Knowledge' | Tue Jul 24 1990 03:14 | 4 |
| Maybe he's been signed up to haunt Schroeder - lightning doesn't strike
twice... does it?!
Steve :-)
|
44.401 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | One Nation Under GOD !! | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:03 | 5 |
| First round draft choice Anthony Smith agreed to terms yesterday
morning and reported to camp in time to practice with the team.
Carlos
|
44.402 | | OOPS::MACGREGOR | | Tue Jul 24 1990 11:44 | 3 |
| What were the terms to which Anthony Smith signed?
The Wizard
|
44.403 | Your outta here | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Jul 25 1990 15:34 | 1 |
| Has Alzado callapsed on the field yet?
|
44.404 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | One Nation Under GOD !! | Fri Jul 27 1990 09:19 | 15 |
| Don,t know about the terms of Smith's contract or Alzado's
status either, but the Raiders and the Saints will be leaving for
London on Sunday, where they will workout daily against each other
and then play on the following weekend. Saints head coach Jim Mora
said he never thinks about Bobby Hebert and doesn't think a game
against the Raiders in London will promote a trade for the disgruntled
quarterback. Hebert has said he has played his last down for the
Saints, and the Raiders have been mentioned regularly as a team
that might be interested in a trade for Hebert. Also read in the
paper that Marcus Allen's status with the team is still in limbo,
meaning that Al Davis still hasn't made up his mind if he wants
Allen back.
Carlos
|
44.405 | Solution | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Fri Jul 27 1990 12:48 | 1 |
| Bobby Hebert for Brian Shaw. Straight up.
|
44.406 | Al Davis | DVF::FORGET | | Mon Jul 30 1990 09:07 | 7 |
|
I read over the weekend that Marcus Allen has been signed.
Mike
|
44.407 | Possible Trade | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Mon Jul 30 1990 10:04 | 9 |
| In the Boston Globe Sunday it reported that Marcus did sign. It
was also reported that The Raiders and the Rams are talking about
a trade that would involve Marcus goin from the Raiders in return
they will get Kevin Greene a dominating pass rushing LB. I think
they were just part of a package deal. I cant see the Raiders going
after Hebert because he doesn't have that strong of an arm, but
who knows.
KENN
|
44.408 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Mon Jul 30 1990 10:24 | 7 |
| The Raiders should have talked to Indiannapolis.
They could have traded Marcus to the Colts for Eric Dickerson, three
starters, and eleven draft choices (those Irsay dudes really know how
to deal, don't they?)
Mike JN
|
44.409 | Another 7-9 season | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:02 | 4 |
| The RAms would be stupid to give up Greene for an old runnin' back.
Marcus had his great days, but now he seems to play hurt every year.
Tim
|
44.410 | | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | Little Homer Simpson in all of us | Wed Aug 01 1990 09:06 | 5 |
| Alzado went down with a knee injury and will require surgery.
Raider_Rich
|
44.411 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | AbortionPolitely=KillingtheUnborn | Wed Aug 01 1990 09:38 | 5 |
| That's bad knews, I was kinda looking forward to seeing that
old timer mop the field with Mr. Ed. Is he expected to return after
he recovers and if so how long will it be.
Carlos
|
44.412 | Nice try Lyle | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Aug 01 1990 13:40 | 7 |
| Sorry to hear about the knee. Alzado would be lucky he could
clean the locker room with mop let alone a field with Elway. It's
probably in his overall best intrest to get the injury now rather
than later when somebody gonna' really screw him up. This entire
comeback is a farce. Meanwhile back to reality......
BoB
|
44.413 | ;') | LUDWIG::JAMES | | Wed Aug 01 1990 18:27 | 3 |
| Is this a career ending injury???
Steve J.
|
44.414 | What a joke | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Thu Aug 02 1990 06:52 | 6 |
| It may not be a career-ending injury, but it's a Raider season-ending
injury. Afterall, he was single-handedly going to bring back the
"Raider Tradition." Now what are they gonna do, ask Jack Tatum to come
back and paralyze somebody?
--dan'l
|
44.415 | Thats a Joke | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Thu Aug 02 1990 09:37 | 6 |
| I really don't think that Tatum was trying to paralyze Stingley.
Although the game was during the preseason and the hit was not really
called for, there have been dirtier hits in the league since Tatum
and Stingley.
Kenn
|
44.416 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | whats your claim to fame.? | Thu Aug 02 1990 09:58 | 5 |
| no offense guys, but is this gonna turn into one of those debates
again on that matter?
dinz
|
44.417 | Tatum epitomized the Raiders and Davis -> Classless | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Thu Aug 02 1990 10:04 | 14 |
| I didn't mean to imply that Tatum's hit was intentional. However,
Tatum was a classless football player (and there have been others). He
didn't even bother to contact Stingly after the incident. Stingly was
very hurt by this. I remember him on Monday night football saying so.
That's an image that will live in me forever. Here's a guy who is
paralyzed and his career is over and his biggest question is not self
pitty as to why this happened to him; the question he asks is why hasn't
the guy who did this to him even bothered to say anything.
Then later on, Tatum writes a book calling himself an assassin. Real
nice rub there.
--dan'l
|
44.418 | Now we get knocked FOR talking sports | SHALOT::MEDVID | muscle and hate | Thu Aug 02 1990 10:14 | 10 |
| RE.416
Sorry. Only being in this conference since February I haven't read all
400+ replies in here yet.
I'll shut up now. I stated my opinions in .417
--dan'l
|
44.419 | diNz + Atlantic City boardwalk = soaring world population :-) | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Aug 02 1990 10:23 | 9 |
| Don't take it personally, Flip. :-) This particular arguement has
gone through probably every version of ::SPORTS since its beginning,
and ol' dINz is a ::SPORTS old-timer, that's why the knock. And you'll
have to excuse ol' diNz cause he needs a memorablelabia(tm) real bad
and cain't wait till the weekend of the 25th..... :-)
Hope this helps.
Hawk
|
44.420 | It IS an ugly rathole/debate without resolution. | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Thu Aug 02 1990 10:35 | 0 |
44.421 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Aug 02 1990 10:50 | 14 |
| Somehow, it can't be the same rathole without Hoot and Monty, who
were the main defenders of Tatum, the cheap-shot artist.
But, I'll let it drop. No need to take cheap-shots at the king
of the cheap-shots.
Also, it would be classless of me to make any further comment about
Tatum's lack of class.
Dinz, you sure are desperate for something to type about, now that
your Yankmees are deadmeat! And George, too. Is Donbo's career
over?
Lee
|
44.422 | no debate just an oppinion | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Thu Aug 02 1990 11:03 | 10 |
| I agree. I wasn't trying to debate, I was stating my oppinion.
Getting back to the present Raiders, they just signed T Bruce Davis,
a former Raider, to a contract. I don't understand why they aren't
showing any interest in Majkowski. If they drafted a quarterback
#1 in the draft it would cost them what Majkowski wants.
Sorry about the previous topic.
Kenn
|
44.423 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | AbortionPolitely=KillingtheUnborn | Thu Aug 02 1990 11:47 | 3 |
| Is Majik available ???
Carlos
|
44.424 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | whats your claim to fame.? | Thu Aug 02 1990 11:54 | 9 |
| gentleman,
i wasnt knocking anyone. just trying to make a point
hawk,
youre right about the boardwalk..
|
44.425 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Aug 02 1990 14:00 | 13 |
| The Raiders have been unsettled at qb since Plunkett left.
That's been a long time now. You can't have a winning team
without a qulaity winning qb. Do you see the parallel here?
Of course Al being the brilliant football mind that he is,
seems to ignore the fact of the matter. He'd rather bring in
a 40+ year old DE and get as much press as he can out of 12th
round qb pick. Grandstanding and talking about that
"old Raider tradition" will do little to improve their position,
at least for this season.
BoB
|
44.426 | mr. ed benched in favor of Kubiak | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Thu Aug 02 1990 14:07 | 10 |
|
Boy the Donk fans are certainly boistorous now that Hoot and Monty aren't
here to keep them in line... ;^)
just remember How many broncos does it take change a flat tire?
one, unless it's a blowout then they all showup....
mike
|
44.427 | He's Available To Some Degree | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Thu Aug 02 1990 14:21 | 11 |
| Carlos,
Green Bay gave Majkowski til' this Saturday
to try and negotiate a deal with another team. Howevr it is believed
that if any team offers Majik a contract then G.B. will then match
the offer and everyone will be happy.
Kenn
Except of course the team that got used a bargaining tool.
|
44.428 | | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | Little Homer Simpson in all of us | Thu Aug 02 1990 14:37 | 9 |
| re. 44.416
> no offense guys...
Unless the Raiders pull a trade for a decent QB, the you cant use the
word "offense" in this note anymore :-)
Raider_Rich
|
44.429 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Aug 02 1990 14:44 | 9 |
| No Mike. We're not getting boisterous but we do need to get
a feel for where the 'new' Raider fans are coming from.
Without Hoot and Monty in here I could count on anything
from a flinch to slam. We will get each other figured out in
time. Opening day has Denver vs LARads. It's a rivalry that goes
way back. Win or loose, neither team could ask for a better
opponent to open with.
BoB
|
44.430 | He's currently in London preparing for N.O. | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | Mo' Better Blues | Thu Aug 02 1990 16:29 | 8 |
|
Former CU all-Big 8 defensive tackle Arthur Walker, a rookie
free agent with the RAIDERS, has been cleared of first degree
sexual assualt charges in Lincoln, NE. Walker's genetic tests did
not match evidence in the case.
glen j.
|
44.431 | RAIDER FAN STUCK IN PATRIOTS LAND | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Fri Aug 03 1990 09:30 | 10 |
| <<44.429 A FEEL FOR WHERE THE 'NEW' RAIDER FANS ARE COMING FROM>>
I AM NEW TO THE NOTES CONF. AND ALTHOUGH I HAVE BEEN READING A LOT OF
NOTES IN THIS SUBJECT, THIS IS MY FIRST REPLY. I AM A DIE-HARD RAIDER
FAN THAT IS STUCK IN NEW ENGLAND PATRIOTS LAND. AS THE SEASON GOES ON
I WILL BE REPLYING IN THIS NOTE MORE OFTEN. I CANNOT ROOT FOR A TEAM
LIKE THE PATRIOTS, AND LIVING IN PATRIOTS TERRITORY I TAKE CONSTANT
ABUSE FROM PATRIOT FANS FOR ROOTING FOR THE GREATEST FOOTBALL TEAM
IN THE WORLD.
LONG LIVE AL DAVIS AND THE SILVER AND BLACK!!!
|
44.432 | Wilkommen | CAM::WAY | Shrooms, for the ride of your life | Fri Aug 03 1990 09:34 | 10 |
| Welcome aboard.
One friendly little hint: Using all upper case is considered shouting
in notes. Unless you've got one of those ancient terminals w/o
lower case, take you caps lock off.
Have fun, with Hoot and Monty gone, the Raiders need all the support
they can get in here...
'Saw (who's a Giants fan)
|
44.433 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Take it as it comes | Fri Aug 03 1990 10:01 | 3 |
| Eddie...........it's about time you finally joined us!
|
44.434 | TGIF | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Fri Aug 03 1990 16:26 | 1 |
| He won't last long after the abuse from us Faider haters...
|
44.435 | LA LA LA BABY!!! | CSC32::LATOUR | | Fri Aug 03 1990 16:38 | 20 |
|
Any word on how lyle a. is doing.......Raiders need all the help they
can get this year to try and stay out of the seller in there division
so old Bro. Al won't feel so Bad about the Bad Choice he made to pay
some shell shocked QB a million bucks to start...Ha ha ha ha.
Drewski
P.S. It's been a while since I've been in notes, and so sorry Hoot and
Monty are gone I hate that they will be missing out on the bashing
you Raider Fans are gona this year. But I must admitt They knew
how to Bust on us Bronco Fans pretty good. To them I say Good
wishes and Good-bye. And to the Raider Fans still here I say
" LET THE GAMES BEGIN SO WE CAN BUST ON YO RAIDER HEAD "
|
44.436 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | AbortionPolitely=KillingtheUnborn | Fri Aug 03 1990 17:21 | 11 |
| Welcome, Eddie
Don't listen to a word these crazy knuckle-heads are saying
about us or the Raiders taking a bashing cause the only one taking
a bashing this year is old horse face himself. Which brings up an
interesting point, have you ever noticed how Bronc fans after a
while start to take on the characteristics of Elway, like walking
around with that stupid Elway grin on their face....Ok Ok calm down
..... I was just trifling with your giblets.
Carlos
|
44.437 | Faider Stew!!!! | CSC32::LATOUR | | Fri Aug 03 1990 17:52 | 11 |
|
Carlos,
Crazy, knuckle-head, Raiders, Bashing, Old Face, Stupid,
Trifling Giblets. Sounds like Faider Stew to me. Mmmmmmmmm Good.
Drewski
|
44.438 | RAIDERS FAN TILL THE END!!! | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Mon Aug 06 1990 09:29 | 9 |
| Hope that all those DONK fans don't choke on that good old "RAIDER
STEW". Especially after the first game of the season when AL and the
boys stuff it down Elway's throat. Of course that is if there is any
room left after the meal of "CHOKE STEW" that the 49ers fed BOY ELWAY
last january.
takin up HOOT and MONTY'S slack with the SILVER and BLACK
EDDIE F.
|
44.439 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Buzzed by the Blue Angels.... | Mon Aug 06 1990 10:16 | 12 |
| re Dan'l,
ON Tatum/Stingley - in John Madden's books, he states how Tatum
wanted to see Stingley, but Stingley's family wouldn't allow it.
Madden, BTW, was the first non-family member to visit Darryl.
The Tatum as unfeeling animal was pertuated by the Boston media,
and picked up in other places, such as Pittsburgh, where Tatum is
often blamed for the hit on Lynn Swann, which was in fact administered
by George Atkinson.
JD
|
44.440 | And I'm a Raiders fan | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 73 to go | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:32 | 11 |
| Thinking of this from Stingley's side of the coin. Picture yourself
as just being paralyzed for life. Tatum wanted to see him while he
was still in the hospital recovering. It's easily understandable to
see how Stingley may not have wanted to talk to the guy who just turned
his life upside down. Maybe he was just not emotionally ready for it at
the time. I believe Tatum went to see him within a week of the
accident. Stingley's beef (and he has publicly stated he has a beef,
so it's not a story perpetuated by the Boston media) may be that Tatum
never attempted to talk to him after the initial rejection.
Steve
|
44.441 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Help Jane, stop this crazy thing! | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:49 | 9 |
| re .439 (JD) on John Madden:
Stingley was on WBZ's "People Are Talking" show a few years back --
Darryl said that Madden was not only the first non-family member to see
him, but that Madden saw him often and still keeps in close touch with
him.
py
|
44.442 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Mon Aug 06 1990 12:05 | 11 |
| Well the first preseason game is over and the Raiders are 0-1. There
were some positives that came out of this game for both teams however.
Some of the plusses for the Raiders; Anthony Smith & Aaron Wallace
(1st & 2nd rnd. picks) were in the Saints backfield often in the
2nd half. Greg Bell was running extremely well. The offensive line
gave both Evans and Schroeder plenty of time. Dennis Price did a
good job of pass coverage. Overall all the Raiders defense played
very well except for Ron Brown and Torin Dorn on pass coverage.
However both Dorn and Brown are both projects at the corner.
Kenn
|
44.444 | C'mon, Johnny, spit out the apple.. | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | Little Homer Simpson in all of us | Mon Aug 06 1990 13:27 | 5 |
| I've been hearing about Raider Stew, but I think we will all be hearing
about horseburgers pretty soon, right Bronco fans :-)
Raider_Rich
|
44.445 | Touche' | CSC32::SALZER | | Mon Aug 06 1990 13:44 | 11 |
| Gets to sounding like a broken record in the various team files
in here. Every time this particular team or that particular team
is about to play Denver, they start harping what their going
to do to Elway. 'We're gonna do this and we're gonna do that to
to him' These are the same people that bash the guy's record
and yet they still have a perfect grasp to his importance to
the team. They also realize they have a far better chance to loose
with him in there. Bring on the Raider's and THEIR million
dollar qb.
BoB
|
44.446 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | AbortionPolitely=KillingtheUnborn | Mon Aug 06 1990 13:48 | 12 |
| Dang! I was sure the Raiders were gonna slaughter the Saints, oh
well I guess like Kenn said, their was some good things coming out
of this game, and its still only pre-season. The defense should
be alot better this year, Wallace and Smith are sure to make an impact.
Plus youv'e gotta hand it to "Toast" for keeping the Raiders in
it until the very last play, which for some strange reason seems
to be one of the Raiders' trademarks. Schroeder on the other hand
still needs some work, and you can't blame it all on Schroeder,
cause there were a couple of dropped passes that were catchable.
All in all though it went well for a preseason opener.
Carlos
|
44.447 | did jack write a book? | SHIRE::FINEUC1 | | Tue Aug 07 1990 01:42 | 14 |
| re .439 and others
Hey JD,
Didn't Tatum write a book?
I'm sure that I read Tatum somewhere quoted as saying that all he wanted to
do was "hurt anyone that came down his side." I thought his feeling was that
as long as he didn't hit dirty it was OK...
Having said that I've seen him try and push quite a few Adam's Apples out the
other side with that forearm of his.
rick ellis
|
44.448 | Raiders need work... | YUPPY::STRAGED | CLEAVAGE is a man's breast friend | Tue Aug 07 1990 03:13 | 14 |
| As a witness to the American Bowl at Wembley last SUnday, I can report
that the Raiders have a lot of work to do if they are going to contend
this year. They looked slow and ineffective against the short pass.
The best show by a QB was Vince Evans (Schroeder and Beulerlein
sipped) until the final 5 minutes when he made two elementary
mistakes...(see my review of the game in topic titled 'American Bowl
'90 - I forget what number it is).
Yeah, I know its only pre-season, but Shell has got a lot of work to
do. Marcus, Bo and Lyle can't win the game on their own.
Your foreign correspondent,
PJ
|
44.449 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | austin goober.smile, enjoy the world. | Tue Aug 07 1990 06:23 | 7 |
| EVANS could strp and be the starter.. if the raiders wanna play
run and gun style football
dinz
|
44.450 | that should say step | COBRA::DINSMORE | austin goober.smile, enjoy the world. | Tue Aug 07 1990 06:24 | 1 |
|
|
44.451 | Too Many Mistakes | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Aug 07 1990 07:36 | 19 |
| Evans makes too many mistakes to be a starter for anyboday. I don't
even like him as a back-up QB. He consistently throw into coverage,
and thats after hanging on to the ball for 5 minutes. Schroeder
is a much better QB than Evans, and I'm sure they'll sign Buerline
before the season starts.
I agree that the Raiders had problems covering the short passes,
but swing passes to backs and dump offs to the TE have killed the
Raiders for years. Maybe Wallace can help in that aspect along with
his pass rush.
The Raiders have excess defensive lineman, when Townsend signs,
and they should deal someone for some help other places, ie.
OL,LB,S.
With the exception of the play at QB, I think alot more positives
than negatives came out of this game.
Kenn
|
44.452 | ? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Tue Aug 07 1990 09:25 | 9 |
| Re. .448
(Schroeder and Beuerlein sipped)
I didn't even see Beuerlein play?
The Raiders play San Fran this Saturday, on CBS, should be a good
game.
Carlos
|
44.453 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Help Jane, stop this crazy thing! | Tue Aug 07 1990 09:31 | 6 |
| re .452:
What is the starting time of Saturday's Raiders-SF game?
py
|
44.454 | Hope this helps | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Tue Aug 07 1990 10:47 | 8 |
|
The time on the schedule I have is set for 9:00, unfortunately it
doesn't specify if thats A.M. or P.M. ( my guess is P.M. ), or
what time zone ?? Although the game is being played in Calif. so
I'm assuming it's Pacific Time.
Carlos
|
44.455 | | OOPS::MACGREGOR | | Tue Aug 07 1990 11:40 | 6 |
| RE: time of game
No way is it 9:00 PM Pacific Time. I'd bet it's 9:00 AM Pacific
Time (12:00 EST). That makes some sense.
The Wizard
|
44.456 | maybe it's 9 PM Eastern time? | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Help Jane, stop this crazy thing! | Tue Aug 07 1990 11:41 | 1 |
|
|
44.457 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Aug 07 1990 13:26 | 5 |
| The preseason schedule that I have says the game starts at 9:00pm
Eastern time.
Kenn
|
44.458 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Got to get some ghetto heaven ... | Wed Aug 08 1990 09:28 | 13 |
| Evans does make some pretty basic mistakes, which will probably keep
him from being a serious contender for teh starting job. On the other
hand, he has the strong arm, is mobile, and makes good decisions on the
run.
FWIW, I think Schroeder should be the #1 man, but he has really
regressed from his level in Washington. Why ? Is his confidence totally
shot ? Or was 85-86 a fluke, and a result of being with the perfect
team ?
Man, that Lachey trade looks worse every day ....
Doc
|
44.459 | | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Wed Aug 08 1990 11:03 | 12 |
| Schroeder looks more and more every day like he was the beneficiary
of playing behind a great offensive line. Although I like Schroeder,
my patience is starting to wear thin. He looks terrible on his short
passes unless it's an out pattern. Buerline doesn't look like the
answer either because he seems to have trouble throwing the bomb
which is a key part of the Raider offense.
With the addition of Montoya from Cincinnati, maybe the line will
be stable enough for Schroeder to stand in the pocket and find his
receivers.
Kenn
|
44.460 | Another QB dispute | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Aug 08 1990 12:00 | 4 |
| Did Montoya even play this weekend? I didn't notice. Your faiders
still need a QB and thats all there is to it. Each QB has his certain
qualities, but not enough all around ones to take them anywhere.
Tj
|
44.461 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Wed Aug 08 1990 13:13 | 11 |
| Montoya played in the 2nd half. Wisnewski was moved to left guard
so Montoya could slide into the right guard slot. If Mike White,
the new QB coach from Illinois, can help Schroeder out with his
mechanics he should be alright, not great but good.
I'm not like most Raider fans in the aspect that I feel that Elway
is in the top 3 QB's in the league. You must give someone credit
when credit is due and Elway has led the Broncos to 3 Super Bowls.
Kenn
|
44.462 | Marino would look great in silver and black! | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Wed Aug 08 1990 14:09 | 4 |
| Is Marino still trying to get out of Miami?
John
|
44.463 | Yipa,yipa,arriva,arriva, andal� | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Wed Aug 08 1990 15:55 | 7 |
|
The NFL's fastest man competition was held last Sunday, and the
RAIDERS have the distinct pleasure of claiming the two fastest men
in the NFL. Ron Brown was blowing everybody away, the only one to
even come close to Brown was Willy Gault in the final round.
Carlos
|
44.464 | How about D. Sanders? | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Thu Aug 09 1990 09:04 | 5 |
| I thought Deion was one of the fastest. At least he is in baseball.
Was he in the competition?
John
|
44.465 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Thu Aug 09 1990 09:54 | 6 |
|
No neon, I don't think he participated, also some guy named Daryl
Green that plays with the Redskins didn't participate (he's won it
like the last 2 or 3 years in a row).
Carlos
|
44.466 | could explain Deion's absence | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Thu Aug 09 1990 09:57 | 1 |
| Any $ involved in this?
|
44.467 | I'll take it. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Thu Aug 09 1990 11:57 | 6 |
|
$25K to the winner.
Steve
|
44.468 | 1-1 | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Mon Aug 13 1990 06:05 | 17 |
| Well it wasn't pretty bu the Raiders beat the 49ers 23-13. Schroeder
looked fairly decent and the defense played real well during the
first half. A must for the Raiders is to get Steve Smith back in
camp. Vince Evans proved once again why he is just a back up by
coming in and throwing an interception immediately. How long does
it take someone to learn how to read a defense. Aaron Wallace once
again played a solid game and looks to be earning himself a starting
spot at OLB.
Along with Smith, they also need to sign Greg Townsend. They need
his pass rush. Does anyone know what the story is with Terry McDaniel?
I have not seen him in either preseason game and have not seen his
name on the holdout list. Getting Buerline into camp would be a
wise decision at this point as well considering that Evans proves
game in and game out that he's a stiff.
Kenn
|
44.469 | | OOPS::MACGREGOR | | Mon Aug 13 1990 07:25 | 16 |
| I saw most of the game and here are some thoughts. The score wasn't
very indicative of what happened. San Fransisco turned the ball
over 4 times in the first half leading to a 20-0 halftime lead for
the Raiders. Schroeder was consistently off the mark. Sometimes
he threw long, sometimes he threw short. Even the TD throw was
off target as the receiver had to stop and let the ball catch up,
luckily he had a huge jump on the defender.
I feel the defense is coming of age finally. They really seemed
into the game, starting small fights, etc. However, they always
seem to have an UP game against a good team.
Not that I partically like Buerline (horrible redition of spelling)
, but I think he is better than Schroeder.
The Wizard
|
44.470 | | CAM::WAY | Take Five | Mon Aug 13 1990 08:18 | 9 |
| What's the story on Vince Evans?
I was watching the telecast and saw him play, then racked my
brain for a day and a half trying to figure out where I might
have heard of him....
Any help would be appreciated...
'Saw
|
44.471 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Aug 13 1990 08:43 | 4 |
| Vince Evans is a former USC QB who has bounced around the NFL and
played for the Bears before Jim McMahon got there.
John
|
44.472 | | CAM::WAY | Take Five | Mon Aug 13 1990 09:25 | 5 |
| Thanks John.
Phew, does that relieve a few brains cells....
'Saw
|
44.473 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Mon Aug 13 1990 10:34 | 3 |
| I thought he played Ben Casey on TV.
Lee
|
44.474 | | CSC32::SALZER | Hand me the pliers. | Mon Aug 13 1990 16:46 | 5 |
| Evans was also the starting qb for the Raiders during the
scab season several years back. He did rather well in those
games and has been in the wings for the Raiders since.
BoB
|
44.475 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Tue Aug 14 1990 14:51 | 12 |
|
Saturday, Aug. 18th the Raiders go against the Cowboys in their
third pre-season game. The Raiders are coming off a convincing win
against the defending Superbowl champs ... in the 49'ers defense,
it was only their first game of the season while the Raiders have
the benefit of an extra game ... and it is still only preseason
football. In support of the Raiders, there defense shut down Montana
(1st quarter) and Young for the rest of the game.
Carlos
|
44.476 | Smith Signs! | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Wed Aug 15 1990 06:54 | 3 |
| The Raiders signed Steve Smith,FB, yesterday.
Kenn
|
44.477 | Hammer time! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:57 | 26 |
|
Did anybody catch Alzado on that new program with Maria Shriver,
called "On the Cutting Edge" or something like that. He looks like
he's in great shape, and he seems like he's got a good attitude
and lots of confidence in himself. Although I think that "neurological
muscle re-educator" or whatever he called himself is a joke, along
with that other knucklehead hypnotist thats replaying tapes of Alzado
back in his greatness, and yelling things at Lyle like "GOTTA GET
THE QUARTERBACK!" and junk like that. I don't know what makes Lyle
think he needs that stuff now, he did'nt need it before, and he
was one of the baddest. Alzado hurt his knee in training camp and
under went arthroscopic, but he hopes to be ready to go for the
first game. Raiders coaches indicated that he had a realistic chance
of making the team. Recently, the former 49'er coach, Walsh was
asked if he thought Alzado had a chance in his comeback attempt,
he felt that this was a farce and unrealistic because of the injury
factor, that is as you get older its easier to get injured, takes
longer to heal, and as a result your always healing from injuries
instead of playing. Makes sense, but then again if Alzado was only
interested in doing things that make sense he would never have
attempted this to begin with. Either way I hope to see him back
for as long as his old bones will carry him, or at least 'til he
bodyslams Elway a few times. 8)
Carlos
|
44.478 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:17 | 7 |
| re -1
Remember that Walsh was never one to keep players around past their
prime. I doubt any player on the Niners while Walsh was there was ever
accused of being over the hill.
Bruce
|
44.479 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:40 | 8 |
| Lyle is still very well liked in Denver.
He was always a good player... lotta fire... take no crap.
He was also very unselfish with his time, money, and energy in work
for the community. He was well respected.
If this is what he wants, I hope he makes good, and doesn't suffer any
injuries that'll nag for the rest of his life.
Mike JN
|
44.481 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:46 | 9 |
|
I saw that show, and it boggles the mind that a guy of that size,
and in obvious great shape, is considered too old or too weak or
too slow for the game.
Does Maria Shriver have a thing for big guys with muscles or what?
Dickster
|
44.482 | Lyle Alzado is a con man | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Thank you, Fay | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:49 | 1 |
|
|
44.483 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Wed Aug 15 1990 12:08 | 11 |
|
RE:481
> Does Maria Shriver have a thing for big guys with muscles or what?
That and bald women.....
Carlos
|
44.484 | | GOOBER::ROSS | MrT - Sports Spy | Wed Aug 15 1990 12:39 | 11 |
| > <<< Note 44.482 by HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER "Thank you, Fay" >>>
> -< Lyle Alzado is a con man >-
You mean it didn't bring a lump to your throat when he talked about
how his father's lack of interest in him drove him to be what he is today?
You mean you didn't believe his "NO WAY!" to the steroids question?
You mean you thought he was serious about wishing he could thrash the cop?
If the NFL didn't exist, Lyle Alzado would be known only as "Prisoner #4545474"
|
44.485 | | CSC32::SALZER | Hand me the pliers. | Wed Aug 15 1990 12:41 | 7 |
| I don't recall Lyle's stats. I do believe that even in his prime
he was not considered big. Speed was good. It was intensity and
drive that carried him. The game has changed considerably since.
He's probably going to end up badly injured if they go ahead with
this plan. Walsh is on the money here.
BoB
|
44.486 | How About A Coach? | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Wed Aug 15 1990 13:10 | 6 |
| If he wants to come back, let him come back as a coach. The Raiders
DL with, Long ,Townsend, Golic, Davis, Pickel, Wise and Smith is
a solid group and there is not enough time for them to play as it
is. They don't need any more bodies at DL.
Kenn
|
44.488 | I guess size really doesn't matter ..... :-) | EARRTH::BROOKS | Dowhatchalike, NoteHowYaLike .... | Wed Aug 15 1990 14:06 | 20 |
|
re .481
> Does Maria Shriver have a thing for big guys with muscles or what?
Probably. Monday, I saw her on the Arsenio Hall show, and Arsenio
asked her the same question. Then Maria made a mistake - she answered
honestly :
Shriver's reply : "Well, yes. Arnold was the smallest I had."
Hmmmmm ........ :-)
Needless to say, Arsenio just let that hang out there, and he and half the
audience just about died before Maria realized what she had said.
Too funny !
Doc
|
44.489 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | go tigers! | Wed Aug 15 1990 14:08 | 3 |
|
brings a whole new meaning to the world needledik [tm]
|
44.490 | Team Leader | DENVER::HITE | | Wed Aug 15 1990 14:12 | 2 |
| Lyle is still well-liked in Denver. He was a charismatic team leader
on the '77 Superbowl Team.
|
44.491 | the score would have been 45-10 instead | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Wed Aug 15 1990 14:17 | 9 |
|
Lyle is still well-liked in Denver. He was a charismatic team leader
on the '77 Superbowl Team.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
oh you mean the team that almost made a game out of it with Morton at the
helm? too bad they didn't have the "Duke" back then....
mike
|
44.493 | Lyle's Cinderella Team | DENVER::HITE | | Wed Aug 15 1990 18:00 | 8 |
| re: -491
There are a lot of jokes at the expense of the Broncos' inability to
win a Superbowl. As a Broncos fan, I can accept that.
But there is nothing that can diminish the excitement we all felt when
the Broncos "Cinderella" Team went to the '77 Superbowl. So your
remarks were inappropriate, in my opinion.
|
44.494 | make that 62-10.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Thu Aug 16 1990 06:04 | 17 |
|
Thanks Steven and your shirt is in my closet waiting to be delievered...
Mr. or Mrs. Hite (hard to tell without you signing out) First off after you've
been in here a while you will realize that I take any and all oppurtunities
I can to knock the Broncos some of us feel it our duty to balance off the
craziness of Broncomania..
Secondly in my best Hoot and Monty caraciture the Broncos should have never
been to the bowl. It was painfully obvious that the camera missed Red Miller
paying off the refs on the oakland fumble near the goalline. A practice
which of course he partook in all year long as Denver got more calls that
year than Magic got airtime when he pulled his hammy in 88.....
;^) <- this means I'm smiling having a good one...
mike
|
44.495 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Nice sandcastle.... | Thu Aug 16 1990 09:38 | 11 |
| Mike,
Anyone with half a brain (which of course, excludes all donkey fans),
knows that Lytle coughed the ball up and the raiders had and were
rumbling down the field. Except the "Clemson" refs (orange, ya know)
whistled the ball dead. Perhaps the worst call in the history of
the playoffs. Raiders would have won game and whipped the Sowboys
in the playoffs, and Tom Landry would rightfully be taking his
ill-gotten genius label and sitting nexted to Reeves and Grant...
JD
|
44.496 | | 8852::BROWN | | Thu Aug 16 1990 10:24 | 13 |
|
re JD
Seeing how Tom Landry happens to have won the third most games
in league history has nothing to do with his genius label I suppose.
Why can't you guys that got stomped on all those year's accept that
the man knew the game better than most of all the other so called
coaches put together. 20 straight years of Playoffs, and 5 NFC championships
IMBO place the man in a class of only a few.
Jerry Jones go eat Jimmy Johnson' shorts
CADZILLA
|
44.497 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 10:33 | 14 |
| The *only* saving grace that Tom Landry has is the fact that
he once played for the Giants..... 8^) 8^) 8^)
Also, while Landry ranks up there, he couldn't even begin to think
about carrying Lombardi's jock.
Lombardi, IMHO, was the greatest coach the NFL has ever seen. Not
only did he breed success on the football field, but most of his
players have turned into huge successes in their personal lives.
It was truly unfortunate that Lombardi was taken from us before
we had a chance to see the ultimate pinaccle of his abilities
achieved...
'Saw
|
44.498 | | 8852::BROWN | | Thu Aug 16 1990 10:58 | 17 |
|
re Saw
What you may not remember is that Lombardi and Landry coached
the Giants at the same time. Both left in 1960, and both went on the
build winning programs. During the mid 60's both had turned those
programs around and found great pleasure in playing one another
in the Championship series. The Ice Bowl is just one case of the
two pitting two great teams against each other. I agree Lombardi
died much to early to achieve his rightful place in NFL history.
Cadzilla
OBTW that jock carrying non-sense does not go off any better than it
did when Larry Holmes spit it out the first time.
|
44.499 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Thu Aug 16 1990 11:10 | 8 |
|
The Raiders have sold less than 20,000 season tickets so far this
year. Even with a good walk-up crowd the Coliseum is going to look
empty. If the Raiders get off to a slow start, things will look very
bad. Looks like Al screwed himself by trying to work all these deals
with different cities.
Bruce
|
44.500 | 3rd? | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Thu Aug 16 1990 11:42 | 7 |
| re: .496
Third? I thought Shula and Landry were see-sawing the lead a couple of
years back. Did someone pass Landry? Chuck Noll maybe?
John
|
44.501 | Lugging the Jock a SPORTS tradition.... | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:16 | 24 |
| re Cadzilla:
Granted. I have a lot of respect for Landry, but I liked
Lombardi better...
re the Jock Carrying stuff:
[Aside: why oh why do I always have to explain everything to
the cherries?]
The "carrying the jock" comment is a SPORTS tradition. Just
as is trademarking a neat expression.
To debate people's relative greatness, and not have a least
one jock carrying comment is, well, unSPORTSmanlike.
Breathe deep the redolent aroma of OURGNG::SPORTS. Learn
the traditions. Never questions them. These my son are
the commandments of SPORTS 8^)
later,
'Saw
|
44.503 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:28 | 10 |
|
Stevie_boy,
Easier Goer could easily handle the jock on Man o' War. They all weigh
within 5-10 pound of each other, and if one is especially light they
just put extra weight in the saddle, anyway. I mean., it not like
you'd have to worry about Billy Shoemaker porking out and getting up to
125 pounds or anything.
Bruce
|
44.504 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:36 | 12 |
| The answer to winning coaches will be posted tomorrow however, I
believe Shula is now number 2 after George Halas and Landry is still
number 3. Landry was head coach of the Cowboys from 1960 - 1988 but
the 'Boys didn't win a game during his first season, I believe they
went 0-11-1. Shula took over as coach of the Colts in 1963 when Weeb
Ewbank went to the Jets. Landry had been a head coach only two years
longer than Shula and in one of those years went winless, so they've
probably coached roughly an equal number of games. It won't be Noll
because he's been a head coach roughly 10 years less than the other two
and Pittsburgh has had some awful seasons under him, too.
John
|
44.505 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:37 | 13 |
|
> [Aside: why oh why do I always have to explain everything to
> the cherries?]
We know the job is the pits, but it's also in your job description
on page 6. [see Fruits; cherries, explanations]. It's right after
the section on [Fungus; halugeonic, distribution]. RTFM, willya.
It's also your job because you're so good at it.
Dickster
|
44.506 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:44 | 1 |
| Dickster....I've been properly chastised... but I'm still rolling...
|
44.507 | Carry this jock, jack | 8852::BROWN | | Thu Aug 16 1990 13:13 | 12 |
|
re: 'Saw
So as you say it's tradition. You couldn't carry the jock of an
Airborne Ranger.
Cadzilla
former Redstone Ranger
|
44.508 | That's the spirit, Cadz | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Thu Aug 16 1990 13:23 | 2 |
|
|
44.509 | | FSHQA1::AWASKOM | | Thu Aug 16 1990 13:40 | 7 |
| Dick -
*Now* I know why I've had so much trouble with the Sprots Manual.
It's in reverse alphabetical order :-) :-)
A&W
|
44.510 | Ooo-rah! | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 13:44 | 15 |
| re Airborne Rangers:
Yeah, you're right. But actually I wouldn't try.
My family's tradition lies either in the Marine Corps (Semper
Fi), or on the High Seas.
Actually, if I ever had to go in (and I'm getting kind of old
so it would have to be something pretty drastic to get them
to call the old guys like me) I'd try my damndest to follow
in my father's footsteps and get into subs...
My uncle was the Leatherneck...
'Saw (Who's always ready even though he's getting older by the minute)
|
44.511 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Nice sandcastle.... | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:11 | 7 |
| Yo Cadz,
I was defending the honour of the Raiders, and berating the Donks.
A time-honored tradition in here. And Landry was 2-3 in Super
Bowls. Lombardi was 2-0.
JD
|
44.512 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:12 | 6 |
|
That's right, A&W, I had a helluva time finding the SPROTS manual
in the library, too. ;^)
Dickster
|
44.513 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:19 | 7 |
|
What a coincidence, 'Saw. My old man was into subs, too. Had a
little shop and he sold a lot of pizza's, too. And my mother, the
soprano, spent a lot of time on the high C's also.
Dickster
|
44.514 | Silver and Black plz come back | 8852::BROWN | | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:27 | 21 |
|
JD
You can dump on them donks all you want. I'll be glad to get in
line when it comes to bashin mr ed and them gawd awful donkey's. Even
though Dan'l Reeves looks like my brother and caries my mothers ( I
hope we're not related) family name.
As far as the Raiders are concerned. I'll be glad when Al can find
another George Blanda/Daryl Lamonica combo to run that bunch. The
Silver and Black have been lacking a signal caller for some time now.
Not since the Snake moved to the Earler's have they had a chance in the
AFC west.
Bring back Big Ben ,the Mad Stork, Otis Sistrunk and Freddie
"Sticky Hands" Billitnecough Sp.
Cadzilla
|
44.516 | Bronco will win West this year boys | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:33 | 7 |
| Didn't Plunkett take the faiders to the bowl & win it?? Grant it, he
was no great, but he got the job done once in a blue one.
The chargers will be better than the la/oakland/sacremento faiders
this year.
Tim
|
44.517 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Nice sandcastle.... | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:34 | 13 |
| Alright Cadz,
See HOOT and Monty, the two RAIDER fans who kept the Donks in check,
took the buyout. So, its up to fairminded, upstanding, outstanding,
patriotic, good-looking souls like you, Mike Childs, and myself,
to try and fill the rather large shoes of HOOT and the Parrot.
We're just the guys to do it, too!
Art Shell announced that Schroeder is the starting QB, since Buerlein
is still holding out.
JD
|
44.518 | | CAM::WAY | 1/2000 @ f2 | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:37 | 21 |
| Hey Cadz, you mention some great football names there.
The Snake...a lefty, and the name described him well.
Bilitnikof...they said he wasn't fast enough, but his quickness
and moves made him one of the all time leading receivers...
Blanda...every man over 40 felt like he was reborn in light of
the accomplishments of Blanda on Sunday afternoons...
Boy, do those names take me back....
And hey, wasn't Ben Davidson one of the scariest things you've
ever seen when he'd be all decked out in the black uniform....
Yowza!
'Saw
PS Dickster...we call them Grinders down here... does that mean your
father worked in a machine shop?
|
44.519 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Greatest dog & pony show on earth | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:50 | 6 |
|
Sheesh...'Grinders'....Hoagies....Heroes.... gimme a summarine sanwich
and a tonic for lunch any day.
Dickster
|
44.520 | Oh not again 9er's 99 donks 2 | 8852::BROWN | | Thu Aug 16 1990 14:59 | 17 |
|
re:516
Lets hope not, can't take another year of listing to how they got
blown out in the Stupid Bowl again. This whole state sits around
and mope's for about three months after each of these contest's
of the have's vs the have not's.
Of course mr ed is trying to learn the touch pass this year, probably
get him touched for a few more Int's.
But I do have to admit it is fun watching them dump on the Clowns from
clevescum. Yap! Yap! Yap!
Cadzilla
|
44.521 | Plunkett was QB in '81 and '84. | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | The Fire Next Time | Thu Aug 16 1990 17:58 | 19 |
|
The Bro..er Donks winning the West this year? What a joke.
Against Sheattle(tm) and the Dolts, they looked like they'll be the
same lucky bunch that they were last year. They made no significant
moves via draft, while the rest of the division, except the Shehawks,
will catch up them. Not that they have that far to go.
I'm not even worried about the Donkeys this year as far as the
AFC West is concerned. The first game of the season will be in
Oakland. Al just doesn't want to let the cat out of the bag. The
Donks will probably get beat up on the way inside the staduim, then
get steamrolled on the field. If you think Dennis Smith was burned
by Jerry Rice, wait till you see what Brown and Gault will do to him.
Like they used to say back in the '60s, speed kills. The RAIDER D
will hit Elway into the turf so hard, he'll end up in Tokyo again.
The real comp in the division will come from KC.
glen j.
|
44.522 | c'mon Glennster | UPWARD::HEISER | boycott hell! | Thu Aug 16 1990 19:50 | 5 |
| Re: -1
Broncs are playing in Oakland this year?
Mike
|
44.523 | AID-ERS...... | CSC32::LATOUR | | Thu Aug 16 1990 20:00 | 9 |
|
Hey, Glen with all the talk about the Aid-ers moving are you sure
Art will know which stadium to take his team. Ha Ha Ha ha ha ha...
And Beat Goes on,etc.....................
Drewski
|
44.524 | | CSC32::GL_JOHNSON | The Fire Next Time | Thu Aug 16 1990 21:22 | 7 |
| re: Mike H.
Sept. 8 Donks @RAIDERS.
Trust me. It will be at the Alameda-County Coliseum.
glen j.
|
44.525 | | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Burley from biking | Thu Aug 16 1990 22:35 | 10 |
| Offense in the AFC west is owned by DENVER.
Defense will be owned by S.D
The Bronco's will win the west
San Diego 2nd
Faiders 3rd they will lead the league in points scored.
KC will finish 4th and lead the lead in a single back offense.
Seattle will wish that they could play Dallas 4-5 times.
Jeff
|
44.526 | | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Aug 17 1990 07:13 | 2 |
| The Raiders released Mike Haynes yesterday.
|
44.527 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Aug 17 1990 07:41 | 46 |
| For all you Raider fans, Fred Biletnikoff is their receivers coach.
All time winning coaches:
George Halas 325
Don Shula 286
Tom Landry 270
Curly Lambeau 229 (Early Packer teams)
Chuck Noll 193
Paul Brown 170
Bud Grant 168
Chuck Knox 163
Steve Owen 153 (Long time Giants coach)
Hank Stram 136
Weeb Ewbank 134
Sid Gillman 123
George Allen 118
Don Coryell 114
John Madden 112
Buddy Parker 107 (coached Lions to 3 titles in fifties)
Vince Lombardi 105
Bill Walsh 102
The only active coach with 90 wins is Joe Gibbs. A decent season will
put him over the 100 mark. Reeves is in the low eighties and Mike
Ditka has 79.
Shula is 60 and if he coaches for 5-6 more years should pass Halas as
the all-time leader. Noll is 58. He should get to 200 this year, has
an excellent chance of catching Lambeau and has a very slim shot at
catching Landry. Knox will probably max out at about 200. Shula fits
the profile perfectly for being an all-time leader because he started
when he was relatively young (33) and stepped into a great situation
right away. Noll started when he was 38 and had two dreadful years
when he started out. Landry became a head coach at 36 (he's 66 now)
and also had a couple of bad years starting out. George Halas owned
the team and was Bears coach 3-4 different times. I don't see any
other active coach getting 200 wins, either.
In terms of winning percentage, Lombardi is first with .740 and he only
coached for 10 years. Madden is second at .733, George Allen is 3rd
with .681 and Shula and Halas are both in the mid-600s. Noll and
Landry are both roughly the same in the .580 range.
John
|
44.528 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Aug 17 1990 07:44 | 14 |
| Some other notes:
Shula, Noll and Walsh all worked for Paul Brown. None of Lombardi's
assistants or former players were ever notable successes as head
coaches.
Lombardi became a head coach at 45 which makes his success even more
remarkable. That must have been some Giants staff with him as
offensive coordinator and Landry as defensive coordinator. Lombardi
was a true New Yorker because he played at Fordham, coached high school
ball in Northern New Jersey and was an assistant at Army under Earl
Blaik before joining the Giants.
John
|
44.529 | Miami will be back on top in the east! | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Fri Aug 17 1990 07:52 | 9 |
| re: .527
Ok, I remember the see-saw battle was for the most wins of an "active"
coach. Anyone think Shula will take the record in 4-5 years?
I think so.
John
|
44.530 | | CAM::WAY | 1/2000 @ f2 | Fri Aug 17 1990 08:45 | 9 |
| RE Lombardi:
I'd highly recommend reading Lombardi's "Run to Daylight".
An amazing book about his coaching technique etc.
Again, a tragic loss. If he'd coached for a few more years
he'd undoubtedly be much much closer to the top of that list.
'Saw
|
44.531 | stubborn sob | SHIRE::FINEUC1 | | Fri Aug 17 1990 09:16 | 19 |
| >>RE Lombardi:
Frank,
Somehow, I think we've been through this before, but FWIW Jerry Kramer also
edited a book about Lombardi published after his death called "Winning is
the Only Thing".
If you're into mushy old anecdotes as I am as well as a single source which
spans his entire career, this is a dandy. Some of the stuff he pulled off
when he was younger was amazing!!
Here's one I recall:
Once when he was doubling as basketball coach at St. Cecilia or St. Mary's
the other team threw a zone at them. Determined not to lose but at a loss as
to what to do, Vince had his two guards pass the ball back and forth for the
WHOLE LAST TWO QUARTERS! Final score 3-2 for you-know-who!
rick ellis
|
44.532 | And the lightbulb went off ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Wyld Stallyns Rules | Fri Aug 17 1990 09:21 | 9 |
| � Once when he was doubling as basketball coach at St. Cecilia or St.
� Mary's the other team threw a zone at them. Determined not to lose but
� at a loss as to what to do, Vince had his two guards pass the ball back
� and forth for the WHOLE LAST TWO QUARTERS! Final score 3-2 for
� you-know-who!
Betcha Dean Smith was in the stands watching ...
Bob Hunt
|
44.533 | | CX3COM::J_COTANCH | MenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlack | Fri Aug 17 1990 11:15 | 49 |
|
> The Bro..er Donks winning the West this year? What a joke.
> Against Sheattle(tm) and the Dolts, they looked like they'll be the
> same lucky bunch that they were last year. They made no significant
> moves via draft, while the rest of the division, except the Shehawks,
> will catch up them. Not that they have that far to go.
>
> I'm not even worried about the Donkeys this year as far as the
> AFC West is concerned. The first game of the season will be in
> Oakland. Al just doesn't want to let the cat out of the bag. The
> Donks will probably get beat up on the way inside the staduim, then
> get steamrolled on the field. If you think Dennis Smith was burned
> by Jerry Rice, wait till you see what Brown and Gault will do to him.
>
It's obvious a few points need to be made here:
--Denver's offense has been using the ball control offense with great efficiency
in their first 2 games, and it will only get better. Bobby Humphrey has been
having an excellent camp and promises to be better than last year. Denver has
an excellent group of receivers, and don't forget about Mr. 3rd down, Steve
Sewell.
--With Fletcher and Mecklenberg as outside 'backers, opposing QB's (Schroeder
in particular) will be running for their lives. Fletcher is one of the
league's most under-rated linebackers. They have one of the best safety
tandems in the league in Smith & Atwater, and if either goes down,
Montgomery is ready to step in and start.
--Brown and Gault shouldn't scare anyone. Gault may beat you deep, but he
doesn't have the hands. Brown has been over-rated since his days at Notre
Shame. Marcus has definitely lost a step, and Bo was doggin' it for the last
couple of games last year. Will it be the incumbent Schroeder, incumbent
Buerlein, or incumbent Evans at QB?
--Faider fans and everyone else can joke all day about the Broncos' Super
Bowl blowouts, but the fact of the matter is Denver is one of the league's
most solid teams and among the favorites to win the AFC title...again. This
team was not beaten soundly until the Super Bowl last year, and that blowout
only gave Denver more incentive for this year. Everyone expects them to
bury their heads in the sand, but it's just not going to happen. Sorry guys.
Doesn't matter if it's Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, Irwindale, or anywhere
else, the Raiders will get their clocks cleaned on opening day.
Can't wait for September 9th!!
Joe
|
44.535 | "REAL FOOTBALL PLAYERS WEAR SILVER AND BLACK" | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Fri Aug 17 1990 11:59 | 22 |
| >Faider fans and everyone else can joke all day about the DONKS' Super
>BLOWOUTS,but the fact of the matter is Denver is one of the league's
>most solid teams and among the favorites to win the AFC title...again.
>This team was not beaten soundly until the Super Bowl last year, and
>that BLOWOUT only gave Denver more incentive or this year. Everyone
>expects them to bury their heads in the sand, but it's just not going
>to happen.Sorry guys .
>Doesn't matter if it's Los Angeles, Oakland, Sacramento, Irwindale, or
>anywhere else, the Raiders will get their clocks cleaned on opening
>day.
The fact remains that the DONKS did get blown out of the Super Bowl
AGAIN!!! But take heart DONK FANS, even the RAIDERS lost their first
Super Bowl before winning their next three SUPER BOWLS!!! As far as
being solid, well JELLO is considered a solid,(see JOHN ELWAY for true
meaning of JELLO). The DONKS should actually bury their heads in the
sand after last years Super Bowl. So be it Los Angeles, Oakland,
Sacramento, Irwindale, or any SANDLOT FIELD OR ALLEY, the Donks are
going to find out THAT REAL FOOTBALL PLAYERS WEAR SILVER AND BLACK!!!
The beginning of the end for the DONKS and their fans- September 9th!!!
|
44.536 | Lets Get Serious | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Aug 17 1990 11:59 | 21 |
| I agree with you about Gault having no hands, BUT Tim Brown is
over-rated?? I really don't think so. In his rookie year he was
by far the best KR in football! As for his receiving abilities he
caught just about everything that has been thrown to him. If you
want to talk about over-rated look no further than your own team
and find the name RICKEY NATIEL. He always gets the press clippings
saying how great he's gonna be and then he turns in yet another
stiff performance.
I'm not gonna rip the Broncos just becuase I don't like them. I
also feel that Fletcher, Mecklenberg, Atwater, Humphries and Elway
are great players, however I don't feel that Denver has a superior
team compared to the Raiders.
McDaniel & Washington make a very good corner tandem. Aaron Wallace
looks like he's gonna step right in at OLB. Their DL is great.
Wisnewski anchors an OL that is improving, and Bell, Marcus, Smith
and Bo make the best back field in football next to Houston.
Kenn
|
44.537 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Nice sandcastle.... | Fri Aug 17 1990 12:06 | 15 |
| Kenn,
You have to understand that Joe is a Miami disco-dancer/prancer
I don't go to classes Hurrican fan, so automatically anyone who
went to Notre Dame is overrated. ND has had its share of overrated
players, just as Miami has. Talent is talent, and it makes no
difference where it came from, ND, Miami, OSU, Long Beach state.
Tim Brown is a talent.
The Donks have the most overrated players in football, now that
's a fack. It starts with Elway and goes through Hecklerburger,
Humphries, the 3 amigas and their coach.
SMASH THE PUMPKIN (tm)
JD
|
44.538 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Help Jane, stop this crazy thing! | Fri Aug 17 1990 12:13 | 9 |
| Which Brown (Ron or Tim) is going to be returning kicks for the Raiders
this year?
I'll agree 100% with whoever it was that said Steve Smith is an
underrated back...in last year's game vs. the Patriots, New England
didn't do a bad job of containing Bo but Smith had a field day.
py
|
44.539 | | CSC32::SALZER | Hand me the pliers. | Fri Aug 17 1990 12:25 | 11 |
| 1990 final standings AFC West standings.
Denver 11-5
KC 9-7
LA 8-8
SD 8-8
Seattle 7-9
Raiders may end up in 4th if San Diego can trun it around this year.
BoB
|
44.540 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Aug 17 1990 14:41 | 11 |
| Tim Brown will never return another kick for the Raiders again after
last year. Although Ron Brown seems like the logical choice, the
Raiders have been using Stefon Adams and Jamie Holland in the
pre-season.I really don't think Ron Brown has a chance to make the
team as a DB so he better volunteer to return kicks.
Isn't it too bad that such Raider greats like Haynes, Hayes &
Christensen Had to be cut instead of leaving football willingly.
However we can thank Shanahan for cutting Millen.
Kenn
|
44.541 | Too bad about Haynes. | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Fri Aug 17 1990 15:02 | 26 |
|
RE: .539
> 1990 final standings AFC West standings.
>
> Denver 11-5
> KC 9-7
> LA 8-8
> SD 8-8
> Seattle 7-9
Sorry Charlie, but I'm afraid theres a flaw in your system.
It was more like this:
Denver 11-5
KC 8-7-1
LA 8-8
Seattle 7-9
SD 6-10
Carlos
|
44.542 | | CX3COM::J_COTANCH | MenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlack | Fri Aug 17 1990 15:28 | 3 |
| I think that was a prediction for this year.
Joe
|
44.543 | | RSST6::RIGGEN | Burley from biking | Fri Aug 17 1990 16:03 | 16 |
|
< Sorry Charlie, but I'm afraid theres a flaw in your system.
< It was more like this:
<
< Denver 11-5
< KC 8-7-1
< LA 8-8
< Seattle 7-9
< SD 6-10
<
<
< Carlos
Just another typical Raider Fan Living on his teams past glory (8-8)
Jeff
|
44.544 | Don't mean a thing if you ain't got that ring! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Sat Aug 18 1990 09:06 | 16 |
|
Woops, sorry BoB, didn't realize .539 was a prediction for this
year. I thought you were showing last years standings and saying
if SD could turn it around the Raiders might end up in 4th.
re: Jeff
> Just another typical Raider Fan living on his teams past glory
> (8-8)
Just another typical Donk crybaby, whose team unlike the: Raiders,
Bears, 49'ers, Steelers, Cowboys, etc...etc....have no past glory
(or much of a future for that matter) to live upon. (55-10)
Carlos
|
44.545 | | CSC32::SALZER | Hand me the pliers. | Sat Aug 18 1990 14:18 | 18 |
| The Raiders are a strange organization indeed. Seems anytime that
people sit and talk about great teams present and past, you hear
about the Packers, the Steelers and 49'ers. If the Raider's name
comes up at all, it is basically a footnote type of comment.
A while back the big hype from the fans was "The Raiders are the
winningest team in pro sports." They tried to play that aspect
into some type of greatness at least in their own minds.
As it turns out the Raiders have been mired in mediocrity for quite
some time now and even they no longer take comfort from blurting
that type of stuff.
On the bright side though, with the added wild-card slots, they have
a shot at making the playoffs. Wouldn't that be nice for a change?
Super Bowl performances aside, there is still little doubt who the
dominant team is in the AFC West.
BoB
|
44.546 | DREAM ON DUDES | WLDWST::LSUSTAITA | | Mon Aug 20 1990 05:03 | 11 |
| hay dudes im a raider fan and i think it will look like this
LA RAIDERS 12-4
DENVER 10-6
KC CHIEFS 8-8
SEATTLE 7-9
SAN DIAGO 6-10
WE'LL I CAN DREAM CAN'T I!
BUT IT WILL BE BETWEEN K.C CHIEFS AND THE RAIDERS
COUNT ON IT!
|
44.547 | nexted | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Mon Aug 20 1990 08:02 | 1 |
| Ralph _who_?!?
|
44.548 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Aug 20 1990 08:49 | 13 |
| The Raiders are a very different organization to understand because the
jobs titles for their front-office personnel are very different from
those around the league. Instead of Public Relations people, Business
Managers, College Personnel folks and so on, they call their people
"Senior Executive" and "Senior Administrator", which makes it difficult
for someone from the outside to figure out who's responsible for what.
They also tend to have a smaller front office than most other teams in
the league.
They are also the team that lists more lawyers in the organization
than any other team.
John
|
44.549 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Mon Aug 20 1990 09:46 | 12 |
|
The Raiders barely won the Cowboys (16-14)this weekend. Strange
how they can play so well against the best and so poorly against
the worst. The Raiders go against the Bears Friday night at 8:00
P.M. E.S.T., NBC will be telecasting the game.
re: .545
Take of them orange and blue sun glasses, and face reality bOb.
The Raiders winning history testifies to their greatness, whether
you choose to see it or not!
Carlos
|
44.550 | just curious | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Mon Aug 20 1990 11:53 | 1 |
| Carlos, How long you been a faider fan???
|
44.551 | Re: 550 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Mon Aug 20 1990 12:04 | 5 |
|
Tim, since '76, I was 12 years old then, and thats around the time
I became interested in football, girls, and other manly type stuff.
Carlos
|
44.552 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Mon Aug 20 1990 13:09 | 12 |
|
The Raiders might be moving back to Oakland in time for the
start of the NFL season, according to a broadcast report.
ESPN, citing unidentified sources, reported Sunday night that
Raiders owner Al Davis is scrambling to work out final details,
including a buyout of the team's lease at the Los Angeles Coliseum.
ESPN also reported that the NFL has been prepared for months
for a quick switch back to Oakland.
Davis could not be reached for comment by The Associated Press.
In other news, the Raiders signed defensive end Greg Townsend.
Carlos
|
44.553 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Mon Aug 20 1990 13:16 | 10 |
| re .552
Anyone notice the Raiders shirts & hats, etc? The stuff they're
selling this year have no city mentioned...just says the Raiders.
This ESPN report is partially based on the fact that Dan's favorite
band--New Kids-- has cancelled a concerted scheduled for the same day
as a Raiders home game. I don't know how much truth is in this.
Bruce
|
44.554 | Old rumour | COGITO::HILL | | Mon Aug 20 1990 13:18 | 11 |
| This rumour has been around for at least a year. Would they move
immediately? What about the people who have already paid for tickets in
LA? If they are moving next year, I don't think the LA fans would be
happy about supporting a team in it's lame duck year.
Besides, I thought that the Oaklland deal fell through, since those
idiots on the city council wanted to waste money on stupid thgings like
schools and trash collection instead of wisely investing it by handing
it over to Al Davis.
Tom
|
44.555 | Sounds like a fair and equitable deal | EARRTH::BROOKS | A radical thinker on a musical level | Mon Aug 20 1990 13:22 | 6 |
| It did Tom, but apparantly, Al realized that sanity again reigned over
the city, so he and the city of Oakland worked out a much more
realistic package that could bring the Raiders back, without
bankrupting the city.
DOc
|
44.556 | "OFF TO RAIDER LAND-AT LEAST FOR NOW" | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Tue Aug 21 1990 09:38 | 11 |
| I am going for a visit to Los Angeles tomorrow. I hope to find out how
the people of L.A feel about the RAIDERS and the latest rumors.
Unfortunately the RAIDERS are going to be playing in Chicago this
weekend, and the RAIDERS have closed practices so I will not be able to
see them while I am there. But when i return in 9 days I will update
this file about what the press and the newspapers in L.A. think about
all this.
|
44.557 | | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Wed Aug 22 1990 06:58 | 6 |
| The Raiders are trying to trade Van McElroy, who is holding out. There
are three teams that are interested, the Seahawks showing the most
interest. It is believed that the Raiders want a 2nd round pick
for him.
Kenn
|
44.558 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Aug 22 1990 08:40 | 3 |
| A 2nd rounder?? He's a good hitter, but his coverage is lacking IMO.
Tim
|
44.559 | Hate to see him go! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Wed Aug 22 1990 15:58 | 12 |
|
McElroy missed most of last year with a hamstring injury, but Eddie
Anderson proved to be an excellent replacement with a team high
five interceptions, including two for touchdowns. Anderson runs
well, can accelerate to the ball and arrives with a bang. The Raiders
will do well to get a second round for McElroy, and who ever gets
McElroy will do well too, as Vann is more than just a good hitter.
He is excellent at keying run and pass, and is aggressive in run
support. He also has quickness in coverage and gets a good jump
on the airborne football.
Carlos
|
44.560 | Oakland Raiders | DVF::FORGET | | Fri Aug 24 1990 10:07 | 8 |
|
Well troops it Raider Football tonite against the Chicago Bears.
Their's been a lot of rumors lately about our Club moving back to
Oakland. I hope Greg Townsend plays.....Even though it's preseason
i'm looking forward for the game. I'm a Mike Dikita (sp) Fan too.
I like his style....
|
44.562 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Fri Aug 24 1990 10:33 | 4 |
| Steven, it's on NBC ~/~
Glenn
|
44.563 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Fri Aug 24 1990 10:56 | 9 |
|
Steven, the game will be played in Chicago, and as Glenn pointed
out, NBC will be telecasting it at 8:00 EST. If the Raiders can
contain Anderson, get their own running game going, and Shroeder
executes well...then the Raiders should win. Also, the Bears have
scored 40 points and allowed 15 in their pre-season games, which
is still pretty good.
Carlos
|
44.564 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Fri Aug 24 1990 14:12 | 17 |
| DONKS ROOL!!!
Brain damaged Faider fans face another year of having nothing to bray
about except their FORMER greatness, and their envy of the CONTINUING
success of the Denver Broncos.
Faiders and Semenhawks will battle it out for the bottom slot in the
AFC West.
Kansas has a legitimate chance to challenge the Broncos.
Chargers in third place.
You heard it hear first!
Mike JN
PS - PUMPKINS IN YO FACE, DEWDS!!!
|
44.565 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Aug 24 1990 14:34 | 6 |
| Kansas City has a great running game, and a solid defense but their
QB's SU*K. I really can't see them putting up a lot of points this
year. I still think that if Tolliver plays well S.D. will be tough
this year. What a mistake they made letting Gary Anderson get away.
Kenn
|
44.566 | Oakland again! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Fri Aug 24 1990 15:02 | 20 |
|
>Kansas City has a great running game,
Only if Okoye stays healthy, otherwise they're nothing special.
>and a solid defense
agreed
>but their QB's SU*K.
so do their receivers.
As far as S.D. is concerned, I think they have a realistic chance
of making the playoffs especially with that parity junk. Matter
of fact, I think all of the AFC West with the exception of Seattle,
will be fighting 'til the last week to get into the playoffs. Don't
expect Denver to have it in the bag this year.
Carlos
|
44.567 | America's team = BEARS!!!!! | ELMAGO::RBARELA | | Fri Aug 24 1990 16:01 | 7 |
| San Diego with the signing of Junior Seau has the (IMO) best front
seven in that divison.
Bears will win tonight!
|
44.568 | Ahmad, the NFL's slowest man | CSC32::SALZER | Hand me the pliers. | Sat Aug 25 1990 14:54 | 10 |
| I caught some of friday night's action. Alzado looked surprisingly
ok, and ok is far better than I felt he would do. Ahmad Rashad has
got to be the worst. I blew my beans and weinies on about the
umpteenth mentioning of 'this is only a pre-season game' or
was it the 583rd mention of 'Raider tradition', or maybe it was
'you really have to make that catch' repeated over and over and
over and........... Hey Ahmad! Get a real job! Soemthing your good
at would be nice. PHewwwww.
BoB
|
44.569 | DEFENSE | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Aug 28 1990 09:11 | 30 |
| Once again the defense looked superb. Aaron Wallace really looks
like he is gonna be a force (3 sacks against the Bears). With the
return of Greg Townsend and the play of Wallace the Raiders should
have a dominating pass rush. One thing that I found to be weird
is that Bill Pickel is playing DE and Howie Long is playing DT.
Schroeder looked horrible again. However there is no excuse for
the ball that Gault dropped. With the return of Steve Smith, no
matter who the Raiders pair up with him in the backfield, they
should have a solid backfield. The OL is playing great altough the
loss of Bruce Wilkerson will hurt.
Anybody have any info. on what's going on with Terry McDaniel. Gary
Lewis has been a pleasent surprise in his place. It should be difficult
to cut some of the young players that they have today.
Kenn
|
44.570 | Alzado Retires | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Wed Aug 29 1990 07:45 | 5 |
| Lyle Alzado retired yesterday. This came about when the Raiders
told him that he was not gonna make the team. For anyone that is
interested, there is a column on the Raiders in the USA Today.
Kenn
|
44.571 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Wed Aug 29 1990 09:20 | 12 |
| I didn't see the article, but I did hear Alzado say that he felt he
could still perform, and produce at the NFL level for at least 3 or 4
more years. (I saw him in the Bears game.. thought he looked good).
He said that Al Davis agreed with that assessment, but felt that the
Raider Organization would be better served by grooming someone younger.
( Ya think that's true? Uncle Al never strick me as particularly
subtle, or concerned with anyone's feelings; but I gotta think that if
Lyle was cuttin it, Al'd be the first to play him. )
Mike JN
|
44.573 | hope it was swearvin | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Soxs Choke? Stay tuned.... | Wed Aug 29 1990 11:53 | 7 |
|
Who scored the other td for the raiders last week. I know Butterfingers
redeem himself and caught one, who got the other?
Steve and JN, Glenn has your shirts...
mike
|
44.574 | Steve Smith | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Wed Aug 29 1990 13:28 | 5 |
| Steve Smith had a 5 yard run in the 2nd half. Fernandez only had
a couple of receptions (I believe 3) for minimal yardage, (under
20 yards).
Kenn
|
44.575 | | CSC32::SALZER | Kuwatis Interuptis. | Wed Aug 29 1990 14:40 | 6 |
| Damn! I was hoping they would keep Alzado so that he would fill
the spot of someone more capable and qualified. Also we could
watch him sit on his helmet and remember those good 'ol
Raider traditions.
BoB
|
44.576 | Say la v | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Aug 29 1990 14:44 | 6 |
| Retired?? The local media had him down as being cut. It don't
matter, 'cause he is better off not playing and getting hurt, hell the
guy is a dinasour ;^^. Don't act either Lyle, stick with your ESPN
show or broadcasting which anybody can do.
Tim
|
44.577 | | CAM::WAY | Jimi and Stevie Ray, jammin' on... | Wed Aug 29 1990 14:52 | 9 |
| Well, actually, I was kind of hoping that Lyle would make good.
He was kind of an inspiration for us old guys trying out new sports.
I thought he looked pretty good against the Bears, but I guess not...
Oh well...
'Saw
|
44.578 | | CSC32::SALZER | Kuwatis Interuptis. | Thu Aug 30 1990 14:04 | 9 |
| By the way, does anyone know where the Raiders are playing this
season. Or maybe better asked, does anybody care?
Ops! There I go again. I promised myself I would try to be more
understanding and a kinder more gentler anti-Raider type. It's
hard to raise that knee jerk reaction from the 'new' Raider
faithful. I'll try to work on that.
BoB
|
44.579 | Smith out for the year | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Aug 31 1990 07:36 | 5 |
| Anthony Smith, the Raiders #1 pick this year, is out for the season.
An OL fell on his knee during practice and it will require surgeory.
It's too bad because Smith Looked to be quite a pass rusher.
Kenn
|
44.580 | Ouch! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | WeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans | Fri Aug 31 1990 11:34 | 7 |
|
To bad about Smitty, he'll be missed this year, although I really
have'nt heard as much about his impact on the team, as I have about
Wallace. That must've hurt.....considering that all the starting
OL weigh in at 275lbs. or better.
Carlos
|
44.581 | Beuelein Signs=Evans Cut | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Sep 04 1990 07:22 | 18 |
| The Raiders finished out the Preseason on a storng note beating
San Diego 34-7. Schroeder had decent #'s, although I did not see
the game. Napoleon McCallum must have made the team with his
performance, 14 carries for 80+ yards. Greg Bell had a 27 yard TD
run as well. The defense played well again limiting S.D. to approx.
17 min. in possesion time. The offensive line only allowed 1 sack.
In transaction made this weekend, Steve Beuerlein was signed to
a 1 year $400k contract. OL john Gesek was traded to Dallas for
an undisclosed draft choice. Players cut were; QB's-Vince Evans
& Jeff Francis, LB's-Rickey Hunley, Darin Jordan & Ron Burton, FB
Kerry Porter, TE Trey Junkin, Special Teams Captain Stefon Adams,
OL Bruce Davis, And DB's Elvis Patterson & Derrick Crudup.
IT's too bad about Porter, he looked good. However with the logjam
the Raiders have at RB ther was noway he would make the team.
Kenn
|
44.582 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Sep 04 1990 10:34 | 1 |
| Beurlien signed for 400k?? Wasn't he asking for a million?
|
44.583 | | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Sep 04 1990 11:25 | 6 |
| Beuerlein did sign for $400k. He was asking for more than a million,
then he lowered his demand, to $1million for 1 year, the same as
Schroeder got. However as has been the case this year, all of Ralph
Cindrichs' clients have over priced their value!
Kenn
|
44.584 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Sep 04 1990 16:25 | 1 |
| Does Cindrich handle Ron Holmes as well??
|
44.585 | I love fine literature. | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Tue Sep 04 1990 16:29 | 13 |
|
The first game of the season ought to be a dandy,
and Jay Schroeder is gonna melt the Bronc defense like candy.
The Raiders defense is looking bold,
and that ain't good news 'cause John Elway is getting old.
Dan Reeves is a sleaze,
and him, will Art Shell appease.
Carlos
|
44.586 | GOOD LUCK TO THE RAIDERS!!! | WLDWST::LSUSTAITA | | Wed Sep 05 1990 06:20 | 9 |
| Raiders dudes lets hope for a totally flowless season
man we need this year to show that we are still here
The Silver and Black are back!!!
The Raiders Team of all decades!!!!!!!!!
Thats a fact jack!!!!!
*********point of no return*****
|
44.587 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Waiting for my Kuwaiti Vacation | Wed Sep 05 1990 07:48 | 11 |
| Da Pa-Raiders are a team dat sips thru a straw
Their ineptitude leaves all true fans in awe.
but pa_Raider faithful see thru black colored glasses
As their hapless team gets kicked on their Assas.
Da faithful always talk of a notable past feat
'tho now their a team dat even Denver cain beat.
NOw they signed a big bum named Jay.
IMO the Raides have truly faided away.
Den 28 Pa-Raiders 10
|
44.588 | | OOPS::MACGREGOR | | Wed Sep 05 1990 08:33 | 9 |
| The Raiders should have a good season. I will say that their offense
will sputter all year, but that it will improve as the season goes
along. The defense will be better than average, which will result
in a wild card spot, but an early exit.
I'd LOVE to see them will it all, but I don't even see them winning
the division.
The Wizard
|
44.589 | Roses are red, violets are blue, Elway hasn't got a clue! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Wed Sep 05 1990 09:33 | 11 |
|
re. .587
The form of your prose is truly beautiful and inspiring
but the context, I am afraid to say, is totally unacceptable.
In other Raider news Mike Alexander, WR, and Bruce Wilkerson, OT,
were placed on injured reserve, and Vince Evans, QB, and Elvis "Toast"
Patterson, CB, were recalled from waivers.
Carlos
|
44.590 | Melt Broncs def? Dream on!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Sep 05 1990 17:33 | 1 |
| Toast recalled?? How dumb can Shell be?
|
44.591 | Wishin more than knowin | CSC32::SALZER | | Wed Sep 05 1990 22:48 | 3 |
| Donks by a dozen.
BoB
|
44.592 | Raiders By 3 | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Thu Sep 06 1990 07:54 | 5 |
| I like the Raiders by 3. The games are always close. The Raider
defense is playing great and their running game looks good. It will
be nice to see the Bronc's starting out 0-1.
Kenn
|
44.593 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Thu Sep 06 1990 10:54 | 5 |
|
The Raiders placed Dennis Price, cornerback, on IR and recalled
Ron Burton, linebacker off waivers.
Carlos
|
44.594 | ^^ELWAY WON'T LAST THE GAME^^ | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Thu Sep 06 1990 15:11 | 5 |
| THE RAIDERS 24
THE DONKS 7
Start of a great year for the Raiders, and the start of a long,long
year for the vastly overrated donks.
|
44.595 | should be one of the better Week 1 matchups | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Go Rochester Red Wings! | Thu Sep 06 1990 15:30 | 5 |
| I'll agree with whoever said Raiders by a FG, only because the game is
at the Coliseum.
py
|
44.596 | No sweat. | NEXUS::GL_JOHNSON | I survived GMIII & NY subways | Thu Sep 06 1990 16:11 | 16 |
|
RAIDERS 27
Donks 23
As per usual with these teams, there shall be lots of fights,
flags from the zebras, and all sorts of other shenanigans.
RAIDER/Den. games usually do not result in blowouts, and this
should be no exception. It's also extra special since they're meeting
in the first game of the season. The last time that occurred, in 1986,
Denver, with the help of the Pile-It-High refs :-), eeked out with a
38-36 win.
Just sit back and enjoy.
glen j.
|
44.597 | Hmmm? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Thu Sep 06 1990 16:31 | 4 |
| Just read that the Coluseium is willing to drop a 58 million dollar
breach of contract lawsuit against the Raiders if they stay in L.A..
Carlos
|
44.598 | This Games For You!!! | CSC32::LATOUR | TOUCH THIS !!! | Thu Sep 06 1990 18:07 | 16 |
|
Even without a defensive line the Broncos will beat the Raiders.
something like this::
Bronkoids 23 3 field goals and 2 touchdowns
Raiders 16 3 field goals and 1 touchdown
Should be a good game.....More important for the Raiders to win
to establish they can play with the Champions......
Drewski
|
44.599 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | It was the blister.. honest | Fri Sep 07 1990 06:39 | 4 |
| ok denver fans send me mail on this one, raiders by at least 10..
dinz
|
44.600 | kiss of Death!!!!! By Dinz | GOLF::KINGR | Save the EARTH, we may need it later!!! | Fri Sep 07 1990 07:14 | 3 |
| DInz just gave the Donks a victory!!!
REK
|
44.601 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Fri Sep 07 1990 09:14 | 11 |
|
>Should be a good game...More important for the Raiders to win to
>establish that they can play with champions.
That's already been established, last Dec. 3rd, L.A.-16 Donks-13.
Besides I can't consider anybody who got creamed 55-10 in the S.B.
a 'champion'. This game should be equally important for both teams,
if they have the goal of winning the division title and making the
play-offs this year.
Carlos
|
44.603 | He's a wuss when you call his bluff, eh Steven? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | 16YearsLater-He'sStillACrook | Fri Sep 07 1990 09:23 | 1 |
|
|
44.604 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Sep 07 1990 12:53 | 4 |
| They'll be lucky to score 10, let alone win by 10. Sounds like
happy hour hit a little early for the Dinz today.
BoB
|
44.605 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Sep 07 1990 13:32 | 3 |
| Steven, the Dinz sure can dance, huh? :*)
Lee
|
44.606 | One Question??? | CSC32::LATOUR | TOUCH THIS !!! | Fri Sep 07 1990 15:21 | 11 |
|
Carlos,
Who are the Defending AFC CHAMPS????? Ha ha ha....
I rest my case!!!!
Drewski
|
44.607 | Raiders 3-1 Broncs 0-4, Now that's funny! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Fri Sep 07 1990 15:54 | 15 |
|
Division championships, conference championships, high school state
championships, they're all nice, but TRUE champions win the Super-Bowl.
You see Droopski(tm), when you look at the big picture, or in other
words, when people consider the history of football teams like the
Raiders, 49'ers, Cowboys, Dolphins and the Steelers, they bestow
respect, honor and pride upon them. But on the other hand, other
teams, that need not be mentioned, are often refered to with sentiments
of ridicule and often times find themselves the butt of the joke. And
until such teams can win the big one, they will more than likely
always be remembered as the one's who choked rather than as champs.
(JMHO).
Carlos
|
44.609 | Back for a quickie !! | QUASER::HUNTER | Jack's Diner, No Brains, No Service | Fri Sep 07 1990 16:08 | 7 |
| Let me say this about that...
The Donks can't loose this game.... No way, No how !!
Bet the house, Donks by 20 and you can take that to the
bank, Dinzy !!
Big Game
|
44.610 | Let's Try It Again | CSC32::LATOUR | TOUCH THIS !!! | Fri Sep 07 1990 16:14 | 9 |
|
Sounds like your taking this Personal Carlos.
Just answer the Question...WHO ARE THE DEFENDING AFC CHAMPS???
Drewski
|
44.611 | E | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Fri Sep 07 1990 17:53 | 11 |
| Over and over again, you Bronco fans say us Raider fans live in
the past, however, last year is this past so lets worry about this
year. As I said before this will be a close game, but given the
home field advantage I like the Raiders by 3. Denver has a very
good team. I feel that the Raiders also have the necleous of a very
good team. Hopefully it will be a hard fought game and the zebra's
wont play a intricate part in the outcome of this contest. Just
remember one thing, You can't bite on the first deek by a Raider
receiver or HE'S GONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Kenn
|
44.612 | former NOTY and Donks #1 fan back in town!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | CNTROL::CHILDS | and the wind it cried Mary.. | Fri Sep 07 1990 19:45 | 7 |
| Cacti you son of gun took you long enough to rear that head of yours..
Just remember buddy you owe me a chance to get even on a personal name bet
pal....
can't wait to hassle and be hassled by you....
mike
|
44.613 | THE SILVER AND BLACK ARE BACK | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Mon Sep 10 1990 08:26 | 8 |
| Hey all you RAIDER fans out there, I hope you all made lots of money
like I did on the Raiders this week. Although the offense for the
Raiders did not look great, the defense sure came through. But as Al
Davis always says-" JUST WIN BABY WIN". I hope that all the DONK fans
out there thank MRS. Elway for that great pass to Jerry Robinson.
Eddie F.
|
44.614 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | It was the blister.. honest | Mon Sep 10 1990 08:28 | 4 |
| ok, i was off by 2 points in my raider prediction
dinz
|
44.615 | find a QB quick | FMCSSE::BROWN | Round'n Third and Head'n for Home | Mon Sep 10 1990 08:34 | 6 |
|
The Silver and Black may be back but the offense stayed in El Segundo.
What a crummy game, No offense on either side. Al needs to find QB
soon.
Cadzilla
|
44.616 | LA 14, Denver 9 | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bring Back Gerry! | Mon Sep 10 1990 09:13 | 12 |
| RE .6RE .615
Totally agree that it was a crummy game. If the Raiders don't get
something going on offense, they will have a tough time against pitiful
Seattle next week. Both teams were inept on offense and had their
share of dropped passes. The key was the Raiders got the points off the
turnovers, and that was the difference. If someone had told me that
the Bronco defense would shut out the Raider offense, I would have said
Denver would win easy. The bottom line is the Raiders got the win, but
there's still 15 weeks of football left. But let's face it, we didn't
either team's real offense yesterday.
Joe
|
44.617 | Raiders 1-0 Donks 0-1 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Mon Sep 10 1990 09:50 | 17 |
|
Ain't taking it personal. Just enjoy bashing the Broncs, who by
the way, got bashed by the Raiders. The Raiders have extended their
series lead between the Broncos now to 40-18-2. Tell you who is
taking personal though, that knucklehead Gaulke, he took it so personal
that instead of bashing the Raiders he he took a poke at me because
of my race, ex: "Thanks for the input Pedro." , shame on you Gaulke,
such bigotry is against company policy and it doesn't show a tremendous
amount of depth for you either.
>Al needs to find a QB soon.
I think the receivers are to blame for this weekend, not Schroeder.
They missed some key plays that would have gotten the Raiders excellent
field position and even more importantly kept the drives alive.
Carlos
|
44.619 | Close again | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Mon Sep 10 1990 10:31 | 10 |
| Tension, Some people thrive on it, and some people die from it.
Congrats to the Faider D. They looked good as did the Bronc D. I do
totally agree on the drop pass situation for both teams. ITs
unacceptable. Look for Denver to come out strong against the Cheifs,
who by the way played a good game yesterday.
Seattle will give the LA/OAK team a run next week.
Tim
|
44.620 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Mon Sep 10 1990 10:39 | 7 |
| Calling Cactus Jack, calling Cactus Jack, come in, Cactus Jack.
Where are you now living, Jack? Since you be the house on the Donks,
are you sharing a stall with them? It's the least they could do
for ya. :*)
Lee
|
44.621 | A Fresh Start | ROYALT::FORGET | | Mon Sep 10 1990 13:21 | 10 |
|
A win is a win. Raiders started the season off on a good note.
The defensive came threw. I have a question for my fellow Raider
Fans. What ever happened to Lester Hayes????? It was also nice to
see Kenny"the Snake"Stabler on TNT last Night.....
Mike
|
44.622 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Mon Sep 10 1990 13:52 | 2 |
|
I think Lester was cut last year. He was a good one huh?
|
44.623 | I believe that Lester's a velcro salesman now. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Nostra/DONus | Mon Sep 10 1990 13:54 | 1 |
|
|
44.624 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Mon Sep 10 1990 14:37 | 9 |
|
Anybody notice the similarity between the Falcons uniforms and the
Raiders? I think Jerry Glanville is a Raider wanna-be, first when
he was coaching the Oilers, the Oilers called themselves the 'Bad Boys'
of the NFL, but everybody knows who the real 'Bad Boys' are. And
now that he's with the Falcons he's even dressing them up like Raiders.
Carlos
|
44.625 | | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Mon Sep 10 1990 15:13 | 14 |
| Lester Hayes had a foot injury and he felt that the team did not
treat him properly for it. He complained publicly about his treatment
and the Raiders cut him, 3 years ago. It's too bad becuse Hayes
was one of the best corners ever to play the game.
I noticed that Terry McDaniel played yesterday, where was he hidding
all preseason??? The defense of the Raiders continued its great
play and the offense once again left some questions for us Raider
fans. Why is Willie Gault getting the ball and not Brown and
Fernandez?? If the Seahags play anywhere near the way they played
against the Bears, then the Raiders will hand them their heads.
Kenn
|
44.626 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Bring Back Gerry! | Mon Sep 10 1990 16:16 | 13 |
| >> play and the offense once again left some questions for us Raider
>> fans. Why is Willie Gault getting the ball and not Brown and
>> Fernandez?? If the Seahags play anywhere near the way they played
>> against the Bears, then the Raiders will hand them their heads.
Brown probably wasn't getting the ball becuase they might have lost
confidence in him after he fumbled a punt and dropped a pass when the
ball was right to him.
Agree that the Seaweeds played bad against Chicago, but the Raiders will
definitely have to pick it up a notch on offense if they expect to win.
Joe
|
44.627 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Griffey's to the left, Griffey's to the right. | Mon Sep 10 1990 16:25 | 8 |
| Why do the Raiders have to pick it up a notch? The Seahawks are pitiful.
Believe me. Even the locals are saying a 4-12 season will be a
good season.....
They have no running game, a questionable offensive line, and the
defensive secondary is virtually non-existant.
JD
|
44.628 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Waiting for my Kuwaiti Vacation | Tue Sep 11 1990 07:57 | 12 |
| >>They have no running game, a questionable offensive line, and the
>>defensive secondary is virtually non-existant.
dat is precisely why da pa-Raiders (tm) need to pick it up a notch.
Sheesh. If they cain't move against da HeeHaws (tm) then they are in
some real serious trouble offensively. 194 yds against da Donkeys is
noth'in to be proud of. Da hawks will crush da hapless pa-Raiders (tm).
p.s. Da CAAYOBI (tm) club was loving Mr. Ed's td pass. Pure poetry
dudes!!!
|
44.629 | hope to see many more like it | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bubby's just another Momma's boy\ | Tue Sep 11 1990 08:17 | 7 |
|
Yeah ESPN on their monday qb show replayed ED's TD as the easy TD of
the weekend.....
;^)
mike
|
44.630 | Hot Or Cold? | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Sep 11 1990 11:48 | 12 |
| Denvers defense is better than Seattles! About the only thing you
have to watch out for when you play Seattle is a hot Dave Kreig
at QB. I like J.L. Williams at RB but the run and shoot has got
to go.
About the Tim Brown thing, if the Raiders have lost confidence in
him, then why did they give up a #1 for Willie Gault?? Gault has
been dropping passes his whole career. The guy can fly but he drops
to many balls. Tim Brown should not be returning punts anyway, thats
how he got hurt last year.
Kenn
|
44.631 | Raiders by 10 or more! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Tue Sep 11 1990 13:22 | 11 |
| re last few
It was only the first game of the season, and you have to expect
them to be a little bit rusty still, Gault and Brown should both have
a great game against the Seahawks as well as the rest of the Raider
offense, which missed last weeks game. The Seahawks have in the
past, always played the Raiders very tough, but I don't think that
this will be the case this weekend.
Carlos
|
44.632 | Rampant Homerism | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Tue Sep 11 1990 13:43 | 8 |
| � 44.631 ELMAGO::CGRIEGO
-< Raiders by 10 or more! >-
�The Seahawks have in the past, always played the Raiders very tough, but
�I don't think that this will be the case this weekend.
Based on what, I wonder.
|
44.633 | | CAM::WAY | Never drew first when I drew first blood | Tue Sep 11 1990 14:08 | 9 |
| >> Based on what, I wonder.
Probably the fact that the Seahawks sip through the proverbial straw,
and seem to have less of a team this year than last. Last year,
they inhaled very discreetly, but they were better than this year.
Probably based on that.....
'Saw
|
44.634 | Did I say 10? Make it 11. | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Tue Sep 11 1990 16:13 | 11 |
| Precisely, as Mr. 'Saw stated. They were mediocre last year(7-9) and
have worsened, while the Raiders were also mediocre(8-8) but have
improved. For the last 2 years it has been Seahawk victories late in
the season that have ended any possible Raider playoff hopes. They
also swept the Raiders last season 24-20 (wk.4), and 23-17 (wk.15)
in close games. Thus, leading me to my conclusion that, although
they have always played each other tough in the past, now, due
to the decline of Seattle and the improvement of the Raiders, it
will not be as close of a game as we are accustomed to.
Carlos
|
44.635 | | DECWET::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Tue Sep 11 1990 17:41 | 12 |
| Frank Wa...
that was far too kind and too gentle....
The Seahawks will be contending with the Cowboys and the Patriots for the title
"Worst team in the NFL" this year....
They are bad, Bad, BAd, BAD
Metz
|
44.636 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Wed Sep 12 1990 06:58 | 3 |
| The raiders have signed a 20-year lease to stay in LA. This
obviously means they'll be out of there within 5.
Denny
|
44.637 | Then again, who cares??? | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Sep 12 1990 11:53 | 3 |
| Denny, I give it 3 years. The Uncle will want out by then.
Tim
|
44.638 | Can't have a short memory with this guy | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:02 | 6 |
|
Al only committed that he would stay in LA. Al only said he would stay
in LA. Al only promised he would stay in LA. It's not like he really
has to. He hasn't signed anything yet.
|
44.640 | Don't BLAM Al, BLAM the city of Oakland ... :-( | FRSBEE::BROOKS | I can make it 'mo better .... | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:22 | 14 |
| From what I saw on ESPN , we shouldn't jump on Al Davis. Once again,
the City Of Oakland blew it.
Apparantly, nothing could be done in Oakland until some
geo-something-or-other studies were done, and a report filed. (I assume
to fully repair and strengthen the O-AC against future quakes.)
This was not done, as a result, nothing else could be done. When
Oakland fumbled the ball, LA picked it up and ran.
moreover, the LA Collesuim(sp) will be renovated at no charge to the
taxpayers (uh huh ...)
Doc
|
44.641 | | CX3COM::J_COTANCH | MenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlack | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:26 | 6 |
| One reason the city of Oakland may be apprehensive in bringing back
the Raiders is that the A's reportedly would be very upset if the
Raiders came back to the Oakland Coliseum. The A's obviously are
the primary tenant of the Coliseum right now.
Joe
|
44.642 | | SASE::SZABO | | Wed Sep 12 1990 12:28 | 3 |
|
dinz, send 'Saw and Walt femail.
|
44.644 | home sweet home ?? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Luke 6:46 | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:03 | 7 |
| The football team still could be lost to L.A., however, if the
Coluseum's private managers are unable to come up with an enviromental
impact report allowing a $145-million renovation of the Coluseum,
along with private financing to pay for it. The renovation must
be completed within two years.
Carlos
|
44.645 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Hang on tight and don't let go | Thu Sep 13 1990 11:49 | 3 |
| I heard this morning on the radio that schools in L.A. are banning
the wearing of Raiders clothing due to the fact that gang members
wear the Raiders coats to identify themselves!
|
44.646 | | CAM::WAY | Batman plays rugby...Robin plays softball | Thu Sep 13 1990 13:03 | 2 |
| Gee, I always thought black and silver were neutral...kind of like
Switzerland....
|
44.647 | RAIDERS RULE | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Fri Sep 14 1990 13:45 | 5 |
| Raiders- 24
Seahags- 10
The fans may be loud at the dome but the only thing loud by games end
will be the booing the fans give the Seahags.
|
44.648 | GO RAIDERS | WLDWST::LSUSTAITA | | Mon Sep 17 1990 01:16 | 7 |
| THE RAIDERS won 17-13 with a 44yard catch from schrader to fernandez
and a bell 3yard rush,it was a pretty sight raiders defence
still looked very good the offence is starting to show a
little more angals i hope i spelled that right? we'll
we got the steelers next week im hoping for a 21-14 win for
THE LOS ANGELES RAIDERS
THE ULTIMATE RAIDER FAN
|
44.649 | 2-0, that's two and zippo, deuce and zilch, twain an.... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Sep 17 1990 09:14 | 6 |
|
You've gotta love it! The Raiders are off to a great start, 2-0,
and perhaps more importantly, 2-0 within the division. Now if only
K.C. can stuff the Broncs tonight, we'll be sitting real pretty.
Carlos
|
44.651 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Mon Sep 17 1990 09:52 | 10 |
|
I agree that the Seahawks got the short end with the Fernandez
catch, glad to see the Raiders got a play off before further review
could take place. But I think it was a good call on the apparent
Williams T.D., the ref was right on top of the play, so there was
no need for a replay. The Seahawks also had a couple of calls go
their way, ex: the generous spot, giving the Seahawks a first on
the final drive that could have changed the outcome. Gotta hand
it to Krieg, he's one tough sucker, countless times he knew that
he was gonna get drilled but got the passes off anyway.
|
44.652 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Just Do It, Spartans | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:09 | 5 |
| Yes, the Seahawks got ripped bad on those 2 calls. So, the Faiders are
outgained by the mighty Seahawks and need a TD with less than 2 minutes
left to pull it out. I'm impressed.
Joe
|
44.653 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Wow, Good nyborg man. | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:55 | 5 |
| >> <<< Note 44.652 by BSS::JCOTANCH "Just Do It, Spartans" >>>
What Spartans?
The Roiders D looked pretty good but the O needs to get better.
|
44.654 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Tue Sep 18 1990 08:37 | 4 |
| Howie Long will miss a minimum of 6 weeks with a broken third toe on
his right foot, and a dislocated second toe.
Glenn
|
44.655 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Little roller up along first... | Tue Sep 18 1990 08:40 | 6 |
| addendum to .654:
Steve Beuerlein was reactivated to take Long's spot on the roster.
py
|
44.656 | Fingers I can see, but toes? | SASE::SZABO | | Tue Sep 18 1990 09:11 | 5 |
| How does one break and especially, dislocate one of the smaller toes?
Did someone apply the DDG (Denver Death Grip) (tm) to Howie's foot,
pulling off his shoe and then jamming his foot turfward?
Hawk
|
44.657 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Sep 18 1990 11:52 | 6 |
| Unwitting dupe of a diabolic practical joke, Howie had both toes firmly
inserted into his nostrils when he was viciously slapped by a Seahawk
cheerleader.
HTH
Mike JN
|
44.658 | Steelers should prevail | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Sep 18 1990 16:36 | 1 |
| He was kicking the bench;^^
|
44.659 | Raiders by > 7 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Wed Sep 19 1990 11:32 | 10 |
|
Raiders are gonna melt the Steelers, look for Gault to burn Woodson
at least once, and hopefully Tim Brown will hold on to a couple,
but Mervyn will be the star again this week. Schroeder must be accurate
and keep from being picked off. Greg Bell should also have a good day.
The Raiders defense (even without Howie) will be the dominating factor!
Bubby's dead meat.
Carlos
|
44.660 | Steelers by 2/USA Today -- line Raiders +5 | OASS::QUINN_R | Steeler's on the Rise | Wed Sep 19 1990 13:04 | 11 |
|
The Raider O will resemble week 1's O primarily because of the Steeler
Defense(2 pass, 2 rush, total in the AFC). Pittsburgs O by the law of
averages have to score a td or two. With Charlie Browns cousin
Schroeder(sp) throwing the ball there's sure to be a int. or two or
three. It's kind of his history although he's only thrown one this
year.
To bad about Howie may have to plan to runn right over his replacement.
Roy L.
|
44.661 | -the "Silver & Black" is back.... | WLDWST::RILUSTRE | | Wed Sep 19 1990 19:02 | 7 |
|
How about last Sunday's and tthe other Sunday's game? The Raiders
looks good in both ends(offensively and defensively). I'm not much of a
Raiders's fan since they transfered to L.A. but I still follow their
games through the season-in every season.
-bob-
|
44.662 | | COMET::EDWARDS | Broncos...one week at a time | Thu Sep 20 1990 09:27 | 6 |
|
While I will admit that the raiders looked good on defense, they were
despicable on offense. If it wasn't for Al Davis handing $1,000 bill to
the replay officials, the raiders would be 1-1 at the best.
Ed^2
|
44.663 | ED ALWAYS LOOKING THRU SILVER AND BLACK GLASSES | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Thu Sep 20 1990 09:36 | 10 |
| RE-44.662 If it wasn't for Al Davis handing $1,000 bill to the replay
officials, the raiders would be 1-1 at the best
But the fact of the matter is that the Raiders are 2-0 and right now
they are the BEST in the west. Al Davis always says just win baby win!
So be it by a bad call or whatever the Raiders are getting the job
done.
Los Angeles Raiders- 21 Pittsburg Stealers- 7
|
44.664 | just made my day | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 20 1990 10:06 | 17 |
|
>While I will admit that the raiders looked good on defense, they were
>despicable on offense. If it wasn't for Al Davis handing $1,000 bill to
>the replay officials, the raiders would be 1-1 at the best.
hahhahahaaaaa and Denver not a call in their life, right? hahahaaaa
of course Smellway going 14-38 with 2 interceptions nad no TD's has
nothing to do with the Raiders' fine record?
Smash the Pumpkin!!!! (tm)
mike
|
44.665 | I don't care for either team, but go Stellers | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Thu Sep 20 1990 10:38 | 1 |
| Mike is the true closet donk fan since Monty and HOOT left ;^^
|
44.666 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 20 1990 13:26 | 7 |
| I don't understand it. The Raiders offense is shut out in the opener
and they win. They basically squeek by the Hawks and make it 2-0.
Now they are alledgedly the best in the west. Their following says
'just win'. Yet this same following accuses the Broncos of 'luck'
when they 'just win baby'. How does that work?
BoB
|
44.667 | BoB, you devil you... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | ThomasABecket,JoanOfArc,TonyPe�a | Thu Sep 20 1990 13:57 | 1 |
|
|
44.669 | Ooooouchie.... | CSC32::LATOUR | TOUCH THIS !!! | Thu Sep 20 1990 22:13 | 10 |
|
re-.666
Did'n someone once say dat tha Truth Hurts...Oooooouch Bob.
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.670 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Read Matthew chp. 24 | Fri Sep 21 1990 09:57 | 29 |
| >I don't understand it. The Raiders offense is shut out in the opener
>and they win.
I liked the way that you neglected to mention that the Donk offense
was also 'shut out', but more than shut out, they were embarassed
by the Raider defense which scored two TD's against the Donks.
>Now they are alledgedly the best in the west.
They are not 'alledged' but in fact are proven to be the class of
the west at this point. Although a sound case can be made about
their inferior competition. :-) :-)
>Their following says 'just win'.
So does their leader. ('Big Al')
>Yet this same following accuses the Broncos of 'luck' when they
>'just win baby'. How does that work?
Good question. And the answer is easy; when the Raiders just squeak
by, they planned it that way, while on the other hand, when the
Donks squeak by, it's because they just happened to luck out. Or
another way of putting it, the "Raiders rule" and the "Donks orally
vacuum immense quantities" (t.m.). :-)
Hope this helps.
Carlos
|
44.671 | Just Lose, Baby! | BSS::JCOTANCH | Just Do It, Spartans | Fri Sep 21 1990 10:14 | 19 |
|
> I liked the way that you neglected to mention that the Donk offense
> was also 'shut out', but more than shut out, they were embarassed
> by the Raider defense which scored two TD's against the Donks.
The performance of the Bronco offense doesn't have anything to do with the
fact that you were calling the Faiders 'awesome.'
> when the Raiders just squeak
> by, they planned it that way, while on the other hand, when the
> Donks squeak by, it's because they just happened to luck out.
Typical Faider fan looking through those silver and black tinted glasses again.
> Hope this helps.
It doesn't help one bit.
Joe
|
44.672 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Read Matthew chp. 24 | Fri Sep 21 1990 10:44 | 11 |
| > The performance of the Bronco offense doesn't have anything to
> do with the fact that you were calling the Faiders 'awesome'.
Unless of course, you consider that the 'awesome Raiders' defense
forced the Donks offensive performance to be so poor.
> It doesn't help one bit.
It was rhetorical.
Carlos
|
44.673 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | Just Do It, Spartans | Fri Sep 21 1990 11:43 | 16 |
|
> Unless of course, you consider that the 'awesome Raiders' defense
> forced the Donks offensive performance to be so poor.
When Elway overthrows a screen pass right into the hands of a Faider
linebacker without being pressured, it doesn't have anything to do with
an awesome defense.
When Vance fumbles the ball trying to reach for a first down, it doesn't
have anything to do with an awesome defense.
When Kay drops a sure catch in the end zone without the defender breaking
up the play, it doesn't have anything to do with an awesome defense.
Hope THIS helps. (Just a rhetorical comment) :^)
Joe
|
44.674 | Raiders 3-0 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Read Matthew chp. 24 | Fri Sep 21 1990 12:05 | 9 |
| Talk about looking through team colored glasses! When Mr. Magoo
overthrew that screen pass it was because he was about to get his
clock cleaned in the endzone, so instead he tried to dump it off
but it backfired and instead of swallowing two points he choked
on seven. And when 'the Vance' fumbled it was a direct result of
being hit by a truck. (Can't remember if it was Anderson or McDaniel
that put the hit on 'the Vance'.)
Carlos
|
44.675 | a modest proposal | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Fri Sep 21 1990 12:57 | 6 |
| Hey, if anyone ever decides to write an objective, non-inflammatory reply
either to this topic or the Cleveland Browns topic, please flag it in
some way so as to attract the attention of readers who might be looking
for objectivity or even (gasp) facts.
Until such time, my NEXT UNSEEN key is going to be seeing double duty.
|
44.676 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Sep 21 1990 13:34 | 13 |
| Objective? Non-inflammatory? That's asking a lot when it comes to
a good old fashined Donk-Faid pissin' contest. Like I said, I'm trying
to become a kinder anti-Raider fan. So here goes. Sorry to hear
about Howie getting injured. If the guy could have a broken toe or
twisted ankle all year it wouldn't break my heart though. (Sorry
that was a slip). When do you think Jay Schroeder will peak?
The way I see it sometime next March. Too bad about the Oakland
deal falling through. Nothing I wanted better than a shot at
whomping the Raiders back in Oakland. (There I go again. Sorry).
It's a long road but I'll keep working on this.
BoB
|
44.677 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Read Matthew chp. 24 | Sat Sep 22 1990 07:35 | 11 |
| >When do you think Jay Schroeder will peak?
You mean he can get better??? (just kidding, I think Jay's a good
QB) Read in the paper this morning that Hebert is closer than ever
to wearing silver and black, as a possible Dallas Cowboy back-up QB
Steve Walsh trade to New Orleans is under negotiation. The deal
which would send Walsh to New Orleans for a package of draft choices,
may be close to completion. But it appears to hinge on a trade of
Hebert to the Raiders for a first round pick.
Carlos
|
44.678 | LOOKING FOR A QB??? | CSC32::LATOUR | TOUCH THIS !!! | Sat Sep 22 1990 14:57 | 11 |
|
Looks like Bro.Al is trying to come to his senses about a QB but
soory to say he'll be stupid to give #1 for heebert. I guess Bro. Al
See's what we all see :
Raiders = NO QB = NO CONFERENCE TITLE = NO PLAYOFFS = NO FANS = GOOD
LAUGHS = MORE LAUGHS HA ha ha...........
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.679 | 3-0 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Read Matthew chp. 24 | Mon Sep 24 1990 09:38 | 12 |
|
The Raider defense kept the Steelers from yet another game without
an offensive touchdown, while the Raider offense scored two touchdowns
2:31 appart in the fourth quarter to give the Raiders a 20-3 victory.
Next weekend the Raiders face the Bears in L.A., and both teams
are still undefeated. re. -1 Keep on laughing Drewski, but the Raiders
are 3-0 without a QB and the Donks are struggling with their over
rated QB, Mr. Magoo, as they lucked out again, against the Seahawks at
home. I wonder how much Reeves paid Norm Johnson to miss BOTH of
those game winning field goals.
Carlos
|
44.680 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Tue Sep 25 1990 14:10 | 5 |
|
The Raiders activated Vann McElroy, safety, and placed seventh round
draft pick Garry Lewis, cornerback, on injured reserve.
Carlos
|
44.681 | Bears by 6 | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Sep 25 1990 17:56 | 4 |
| Should be a defensive struggle come sunday. The Bears D is better
IMO. Both offenses are shaky.
Tim
|
44.682 | Raiders +7 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Wed Sep 26 1990 10:34 | 9 |
| The Bears offense just got a little shakier. Read in this mornings
paper that RB Mark Green (stretched cartilage, left knee) will be
out for two weeks; WR Wendell Davis (two sore hamstrings) is doubtful
for Sunday; RB Neil Anderson (bruised ribs and possible torn cartilage
around the ribs) will play wearing a flak jacket; and K Kevin Butlers
hip pointer is affecting his kicking. The Raiders should have a
field day.
Carlos
|
44.683 | | ACTING::MACGREGOR | | Wed Sep 26 1990 14:42 | 9 |
| Forget everything you know. This SHOULD be a defensive battle,
it won't, it SHOULD be low scoring, it won't, it SHOULD be two teams
running each other into the group, it won't.
It will be a fairly high scoring game where the defenses are average
at best and both QB's throw for 250 yds. However, the Raiders will
be victorious 30-27.
The Wizard
|
44.684 | GOT TO KEEP LAUGH'N!!! | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Wed Sep 26 1990 17:55 | 12 |
|
Carlos So you Admitt your Beloved Raiders DO NOT HAVE A QB! Ha ha ha :-)
I'm glad to see you take some sort of objective veiw of your
Beloved Raiders Sometimes in these notes it seems like people are so
stuck on there team being winners they can't see there teams weakness
or at least won't admitt it. That's one for......:-)
P.S. By the way that's " THE DREWSKI " :-)
|
44.685 | If you thought that was funny.....! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:09 | 32 |
|
In yesterdays USA Today they had the AFC team-by-team statistics,
and within those stats. they have QB ratings based on: Att, Cmp,
Cmp%, Yds, Avg/a, TD's, TD%, Int, Int%, and Lg. Here's how the AFC
QB's rated up to week 3:
NAME RATE
------------------ -------------
1st Grogan 98.6
2nd DeBerg 93.3
3rd Kelly 89.1
******* 4th SCHROEDER 88.7 *******
5th Boomer 81.9
******* 6th ELWAY 81.2 *******
7th O'Brien 78.4
8th Moon 77.9
9th Tolliver 67.9
10th Krieg 66.9
11th Marino 65.4
12th Kosar 58.4
13th Brister 53.8
14th George 43.9
So you see Drewski, even though the Raiders weakest point is
their QB, he is still better than most, including Mr. Magoo. Hope
my continued objective opinion has given you a few more laughs cause
I know when I see these stats. and think of all the misled Donk
fans out there, it's enough to keep me rolling. 8-)
Carlos
|
44.686 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:20 | 4 |
| The rating system you site isn't USA Today's, it's the offical NFL
rating system.
John
|
44.687 | biting the hand that feeds him | GENRAL::WADE | Bye bye Ms. American Pie | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:42 | 6 |
| Carlos,
You shouldn't be bad mouthing Elway like that. He gave
the Raiders their first victory.
Claybone
|
44.688 | Don't read too much into stats | BSS::JCOTANCH | TheGreatAmericanDream: ND goes 0-11 | Thu Sep 27 1990 10:50 | 7 |
| Carlos, this system rates passers, not quarterbacks. Therefore, it
doesn't take into account such very important qualities such as
rushing, ability to scramble, ability to throw on the run, leadership,
etc. You would have to agree that Grogan isn't even one of the top 7
or 8 best QB's in the AFC, let alone the best.
Joe
|
44.689 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Jump back!!! What's that sound? | Thu Sep 27 1990 11:55 | 3 |
| Carlos has the makings of a Hoot or a Monty. Twisted Dastistics and
biases he chooses to cite as da FACKS (tm). Carlos, pat yerself on the
back, u is Hall of Fame bound.
|
44.690 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Thu Sep 27 1990 12:02 | 4 |
|
Yeah, ......but day iz da facks, bruvah!
Cahlos
|
44.691 | GOT TO KEEP LAUGH'N...... | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Thu Sep 27 1990 13:59 | 10 |
|
Carlos, I can't stop laugh'n at you dude...Ha ha ha
Your telling me based on those dats that Roeder-head is
better than Boomer and Elway and Moon and Marino and Kosar?
I'm laugh'n so hard I'm about to break a Rib....Ha ha ha
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.692 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:19 | 9 |
|
Well I don't know about Marino, Moon, and Boomer, but I think he's
just as good as Kosar and Magoo, in his own right. He may not be
able to scrammble as well as Magoo, but then again Magoo can't launch
it like Schroeder can either. Sure, sure, I know Magoo has a strong
arm, but there is no one better than Schroeder with the bomb. Which
is perfect for the Raiders style of play.
Carlos
|
44.693 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | TheGreatAmericanDream: ND goes 0-11 | Thu Sep 27 1990 14:40 | 6 |
| So *maybe* Schroeder can throw the ball longer than Elway (standing
still) but that doesn't make him a better QB than Elway. Or even
close, for that matter. Also, I'm not very high on Kosar, but if I had
a choice between Schroeder and Bernie, I'd take Bernie in a second.
Joe
|
44.694 | Elway's a bum | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 27 1990 15:00 | 7 |
|
And if I had a choice between Jay and "the duke" I'd take Jay. ELWAY'S
way to prone to interceptions besides being a big crybaby. Jay maybe
full of himself but he doen't cry when things don't go his way he takes it
like a man...
mike
|
44.695 | " ELWAY = RIGHT WAY " | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Thu Sep 27 1990 15:15 | 23 |
|
Okay Carlos now I see where you're coming from, the stats have
nothing to do with Elway vs Roeder-head. Because if you base it
on stats then Elway is better then Mario,Moon,Kosar. When you
Said the phrase " I think " opened my understanding that you just
don't like Elway cause there's no way Roeder-head is better or even
as good as Elway. Put Elway and Roeder-Head on the Trade wire and see
which one of them would the Raiders like to have. Look if you don't like
Elway Just says you don't like him But to try and us stats to say he's
not one of the best QB in the NFL is........(Well I Guess Your Opinion).
I know Bro.Al would pick Elway because Elway Follows his Motto
" just win Baby " even if it don't look good " just win baby "
P.S. Bro. AL did try and get Elway from the Colts when he first came
out of College offered a lot for him but the Colts gave he to
Denver for 1st and some cash I think.
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.697 | The shame of it | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 27 1990 15:34 | 19 |
|
> OH YEAH, WHO WON "THE NFL QUARTERBACK CHALLENGE" THAT WAS
> ON TV LASTED SUNDAY (BUT WAS TAPED OVER THE SUMMER) WHEN I
> TURNED IT ON IT WAS WARREN MOON TRYING TO HIT A GOLF CART THAT
I saw part of that while flicking through the channels, and it has
to be the most ridicalus TV trashsport event ever held. At one point
where they were throwing at these big receiver targets with a
couple of mean defenders thrown in for effect, Bill Walsh, in all
seriousness, was saying stuff like: "Did you see that! Moon had a
hard time reading that man. That's the same problem he has with
defenses in the NFL. Just not quick enough on the read..."
It's a long, hard fall from head coach of the best football team in the
free world to network sports prostitute, I guess. What an
embarrassment...
glenn
|
44.698 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:36 | 18 |
|
I agree Glenn, that QB challenge was a joke. Although all of the
QB's were exposed to the same circumstances, the circumstances
weren't very realistic. There is a big difference in throwing to
a golf cart that is going ten mph (or whatever it is golf carts do
nowadays) and a WR such as Gault flying down the field getting faster
as he goes. Same goes for the 20' by 20' billboards they had moving
across the field (at different distances) with a basketball sized
bullseye in the middle, I think Moon is the only one to even hit any
of these, and it wasn't anywhere near to the bullseye. The distance
test was won by Schroeder (throwing 76yds), with little effort, and
it consisted of the QB's starting in the endzone and running up to the
goal line and launching it downfield as far as they could. It was
surprising, but alot of the older QB's did real well on these tests.
All in all though it was bunk, and not a very good indicator.
Carlos
|
44.699 | A matter of opinion, not stats | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Thu Sep 27 1990 16:46 | 15 |
| re-mike, Shroeder (sp?) not a cry baby?? Did you forget what got
him traded from the REdskins in the 1st place? Let me refresh your
memory (and mine).
Gibbs benched Jay for Doug Williams, so Jay cried and cried until
Gibbs & co. considered trading him, even after williams got hurt,
if I remember it. Jay just kept saying he could start for about any
team in the NFL, but he!!, he couldn't even beat Buerlin out of a job
in Faiderville until Buerlin's holdout this year. Actually, I'm
suprised Shell hasn't tried Steve yet, 'cause Jay isn't really playing
that great, regarless of the 3-0 record. The LA/OAK defense is whats
been the dominating factor in the victories (IMO).
Tim
|
44.700 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Sep 27 1990 20:40 | 10 |
| That list of qb rankings is not worth the paper it's printed on.
It never has been but the topic surfaces anually as food for debate.
OK Carlos. Let's put it another way. If you had your choice of
Schroeder or any number of the other names to choose as your qb,
how many would be ahead of Jay? I would hope the list would be
medium to long. Now if I had to select for starters ahead of Elway,
you could count them on 2 fingers, maybe. Believe me, Shroeder is not
one of them.
BoB
|
44.701 | Johnny intys | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Fri Sep 28 1990 07:20 | 13 |
|
Seems to me all Jay was doing was telling everybody he was better than Doug
and he should be the starter. Not the same as I don't want to play for you
so if you don't trade me I'll go play baseball like ole Johnny boy. And Jay
was a decent a baseball player as well. Besides I've never seen Jay spike a
ball or cry after a bad play....
Well Bob you may have only two fingers but try these for size
Montana, Marino, Eiasion, Cunningham, Simms, Testerverdi,Rypien
Moon just to name a few.....
mike
|
44.703 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Fri Sep 28 1990 09:41 | 18 |
|
When Schroeder demands to be played or traded he's a whiner, but
when Magoo's doing the crying it's a shrewd business agreement.
Go figure...
>If you had your choice of Schroeder or any number of the other
>names to choose as your qb, how many would be ahead of Jay? I would
>hope the list would be medium to long.
It would probably be medium, but I guarantee Elway wouldn't be on
it. It would probably look something similar to the list Mike asked
you to count on both of your fingers. On the other hand if Elway was
my QB and I was asked to make a list of QB's that I'd rather have,
it too would be medium, but Schroeder would more than likely be on
this list. 8-)
Carlos
|
44.704 | Wassop with Dyal ? | PLANIT::KUMAR | Ashish | Fri Sep 28 1990 09:48 | 13 |
|
Dudes,
Sorry to butt in like this, but like, can i get a quick update on Raider
tight end Mike Dyal, he is my fantasy football starting tight end, and
he was put on injury reserve a couple of days before week 3.
Is he still on ir, what's the injury, when can we expect him back,
any info would be appreciated,
later,
Ashman.
|
44.707 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Fri Sep 28 1990 10:35 | 8 |
| I think Steven's right about IR being six weeks. Look for Howie,
Bo, and Dyal to rejoin the Raiders right around the 'bye' time (wk.8).
'Though I think Bo will probably start a week or two sooner. The
Raiders are off to a great start, and with the return of these three
knuckleheads, they should be even tougher down the stretch.
Carlos
|
44.708 | Where's HOOT ? | KAOFS::R_OBAS | | Fri Sep 28 1990 11:42 | 5 |
|
I thought this is the place to ask.
ric
|
44.709 | | CAM::WAY | Happiness is a loose ruck | Fri Sep 28 1990 11:57 | 14 |
| > I thought this is the place to ask.
>
> ric
Ric --
I don't see any smilies, so I'm assuming you're serious. HOOT and
Monty both took the severance package several months ago...
Somehow it ain't quite the same.....8^(
'Saw
|
44.710 | I did'nt know ! | KAOFS::R_OBAS | | Fri Sep 28 1990 12:07 | 7 |
| Saw,
I was serious, I did'nt know. You're right it's different. At this
time of Football season, there's always BIG argument between Hoot and
Steven (well Carlos is filling up the gap, not as good as Hoot but....)
ric
|
44.711 | HOME SWEET HOME | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Fri Sep 28 1990 12:08 | 4 |
| The Raiders streak in the coliseum cintinues sunday.
Los Angeles Raiders- 24
Chicago Bores- 17
|
44.712 | Another Friday of fun;^ | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Fri Sep 28 1990 12:36 | 14 |
| Get tougher at week 8?? The faiders are peaking right now, and by
the time week 8 roles around, they will have at least 2-3 loses and
going more downhill from there.
Everyone is P&M (tm) about the QBs, so what about Buerlin? He held
out of camp. At least Elway has had more class than that.....
Also, What week last year did Shell take over? Someone told me he
is undefeated as a head coach, and I don't think thats right. I could
of sworn that Shanahan was canned week 4, and Shell took the helm at
week 7 or 8.
Tim
|
44.714 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Fri Sep 28 1990 12:49 | 22 |
| Well... everyone's entitled to an opinion (except Mike Childs, who is
biased ;'D)
When it comes to QB's, who you would place in front of who depends a
lot on which team(s) you're a fan of.
Something worth noticing:
Bronco bashers `wouldn't have Elway on the list.' That's okay.
But...With the exception of the Forty-Niners, most fans would probably
place another QB in place of the individual who is their current QB.
As a Bronco fan, and realizing that whatever QB I opted for would be
dealing with the same supporting group that Elway has now, I cannot
think of a single QB I would rather have in his place. That's right.
Including Montana. But.... I'd let him be Elway's backup instead of
Kubiak.
And no, Schroeder wouldn't be on the list if I had to pick the QB's I'd
like to see as Elway's backup (Kubiak WOULD be on the list).
Mike JN
|
44.716 | | FMCSSE::BROWN | Whiskey River's don't run Dry | Fri Sep 28 1990 13:35 | 16 |
| re carlos and qb's
IMHO. BEING NEITHER A RAIDER OR A BRONCO FAN. Your idea that Jay S.
is better that Mr. Ed is a pure lack of knowledge of the game. Elway
has some talent, Jay has none. The only reason I can find for Al Davis
signing him is out of desperation. Being able to throw the ball a mile
don't mean zip, if you can't read a defense or find the guy that open.
It would be my guess that the kid from ND will be replacing Jay-boy
in the near future and the raiders will be in a better position whne he
does.
Bring George Blanda back Please!!
Cadzilla
|
44.717 | not a fit | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Fri Sep 28 1990 13:47 | 3 |
| Hasn't Hebert been in for a look with the Raiders once before (outta
college maybe)? Seems to me that The Ragin' Cajun is more a short-pass
guy. That just ain't the Raiders game.
|
44.718 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Fri Sep 28 1990 14:09 | 22 |
|
Well Cadzilla, your'e certainly entitled to your opinion. But to
say that Elway has some talent and Jay has none, IMHO is not only
a lack of football knowledge, but not very good common sense either.
If he didn't have any talent there is no way on God's green earth
that he could be a QB in the pros, much less a starter. This debate
can go on all season long, and I'll never be able to convince a
Donk fan (even with the support of stats) that Schroeder is better than
Elway, or likewise will they convince me of the opposite. I know
Jay is not the best QB around, but the point I was trying to make
with the stats and all, is that neither is Elway. (Drewski and the
gang are constantly blamming Schroeder (kinda like I do to Elway)and
I thought it would be fun to show them that statistically, there
hero is rated worse than Schroeder)Matter of fact, I think he's highly
over rated simply because of his ability to scrammble. Personally I
think he developed this ability as a result of being so scared to
get hit that instead he decided to do the manly thing and run for
his life.
Carlos
|
44.719 | see a Donk fan, pull his chain | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Fri Sep 28 1990 14:23 | 9 |
|
Elway a wuss he's been know to cry on the sidelines after losses. Terry
Bradshaw was right on the money about the overrated slingshot artist
who couldn't read a defense with a primer! I do like his touch passes
though, they always seem to end up in the opposition's hands....
and that's my opinion JN!!! ;^) hahahaaaa
mike
|
44.720 | No donk fans here | FMCSSE::BROWN | Whiskey River's don't run Dry | Fri Sep 28 1990 14:28 | 12 |
|
Well carlos
My reference to talent had to do with the other Qb's within the NFL.
He's big, He's got a stong arm, but He counld'nt read a Good defense if
Big Al's life depended on it. He's the starter because the kid from ND
was a holdout. Also do not, I repeat do not call me a Donkco fan. Just
because I consider Mr. Ed to be better that Jay-boy does not make me
bleed orange.
Cadzilla 8^)
|
44.721 | By the way Shell's record is: 10-5 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Fri Sep 28 1990 14:47 | 20 |
| >but he couldn't read a Good defense if Big Al's life depended on
>it.
Well, they don't come much better than Chicago's, so I guess we'll
just have to wait and see how he does against them.
>He's the starter because the kid from ND was a holdout.
He didn't hold out last year, and I believe Schroeder was the starter
than too. However it didn't last too long.
> ,I repeat do not call me a Donkco fan.
Sorry if my reply was confusing I can see how you'd be insulted, but
I didn't specifically call you one nor did I mean to imply that. It
was pretty clear by your reply that you supported neither.
Carlos
|
44.722 | We'll wait and see, okay!! | FMCSSE::BROWN | Whiskey River's don't run Dry | Fri Sep 28 1990 14:56 | 9 |
|
okay Carlos
I'll lay off of Jay-Boy. If he can get 300 yd's against Bear's, he
has some talent, otherwise I'll still consider him a no talent stiff
holding the Raiders down.
Cadzilla
|
44.723 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Fri Sep 28 1990 15:20 | 6 |
| If he gets 300 yds against the Bears, which right now are #2 against
the pass and limited Krieg to only 74 yds, he better have more than
some talent. I think even the Montanas and Marinos of the world
would have a hard time filling that order.
Carlos
|
44.724 | Youz guyz | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Fri Sep 28 1990 15:26 | 4 |
| Does this mean that you guys aren't going to meet in the parking lot
after work??;;;;;^^^^^^
Tj
|
44.725 | You tell me | FMCSSE::BROWN | Whiskey River's don't run Dry | Fri Sep 28 1990 15:41 | 7 |
|
No comments from the cheap seats please!! I don't hear any of you Donk
fan in here sticking up for Mr.ED. What gives? Is Jay-boy truly better
than John (Who could eat corn through a picket fence) Elway?
Cadzilla 8^)
|
44.726 | HOLD ON THERE!!! | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Sep 28 1990 16:58 | 17 |
|
>What gives? I'm begining to think Roeder-Head(tm) is Truly better
than ELway?
There is only 1 QB in the leauge That's better than Elway (IMO)
and I think you know who that is without a Doubt.
I'm getting tired of this Roeder-Head vs Elway I think we all know
the truth of the matter but Just one more Thing, Who get's paid ($)
the most Elway or Roeder-Head. I think that has something to do with
how good you are also.
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.727 | Hoot and Monty we need ya they're out of control | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Fri Sep 28 1990 17:19 | 22 |
|
> There is only 1 QB in the leauge That's better than Elway (IMO)
> and I think you know who that is without a Doubt.
I've already named 5 or 6 you want more?
> I'm getting tired of this Roeder-Head vs Elway I think we all know
> the truth of the matter but Just one more Thing, Who get's paid ($)
> the most Elway or Roeder-Head. I think that has something to do with
> how good you are also.
Well you can fool some of the people some of the times and some of
of the people all of the time. Denver fans are the later where the
Duke is concerned. The guy had a career year and signed a big contract
right after that. Hey if Bowlan wants to waste his money it ain't my
concern.................
many smiles
mike
|
44.728 | | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Sep 28 1990 17:39 | 2 |
|
|
44.729 | 4-0 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Mon Oct 01 1990 09:11 | 10 |
| The Bears ain't nothin! Raider defense shut the Bears down, and
I think that they've scored more TD's then they've allowed. The
running game also had a good day against the Bears #2 defense, running
for 156 yds. Schroeder got the job done by getting 170 yds on 8
receptions. Can't say enough about the defense though, they sacked
the Harbaugh 6 times for 66 yds. Better watch out Kelly, the Raiders
are coming.
Carlos
|
44.730 | THE SILVER AND BLACK IS BACK !!!! | EARRTH::BROOKS | Two snaps, a twist, and a kiss! | Mon Oct 01 1990 10:00 | 4 |
| Schroeder is near-deity !!!!!!!!!!!
GO RAIDERS !!!!!
|
44.731 | Still 12 weeks left | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Mon Oct 01 1990 11:19 | 9 |
| re-1
Are you jumpin' on the ole' bandwagon again??
The have only played 4 games, and was able to dominate 1 of them,
which was yesterday. I was suprised at the Bear D, but not the Bears
O.
Tim
|
44.732 | 708-303-9944 x2740 | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Mon Oct 01 1990 11:28 | 7 |
| Neal Anderson: 6 carries. 26 yards. No receptions.
I called the Chicago Bears Line on Friday to see if Neal was playing
but there was no mention of his condition. There was supposed to be an
updated report before Sunday but I didn't call back.
Anyone have more news on Anderson's health?
|
44.734 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Two snaps, a twist, and a kiss! | Mon Oct 01 1990 11:36 | 4 |
| Hardly .... look at where I picked the Raiders - t be right there for
the AFC West title. I probably won't get behind them again until they
return to Oakland (my hometown), but it's good to know that Art Shell
has managed to bring a little of Oakland to LA.
|
44.735 | re. Anderson | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Mon Oct 01 1990 11:38 | 7 |
| Don't know how well he was doing before the game, but I know he's
hating life today, 'cause he took a shot to the ribs/back at the
start of the second half yesterday and was real slow getting up.
Don't think he played much after that.
Carlos
|
44.736 | | UPWARD::HEISER | ultimate, underlyin', no denyin' motivation | Mon Oct 01 1990 12:17 | 7 |
| I watched about 1 quarter of this game yesterday. Schroeder(sp?) looks
very much improved. Mike White has done a lot for Jay's game!
This just might be the missing link they needed. Everyone knows that
the QB spot was their only weak link.
Mike
|
44.737 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:11 | 11 |
| Here's one Raider fan who believes that Elway is much better than
Schroeder. However, over the last couple of games, Schroeder has
done everything the Raiders want him to do. 8-15 for 176 yds. are
very good #'s if thats what the offense is asking of you. With the
running game that the Raiders have,Bo's almost ready, thier passing
attack opens up deep. Schroeder averaged 22yds. a completion against
the Bears. Either way the RAIDERS are 4-0. Bring on the Bills.
Kenn
BTW-Aarron Wallace looks great!!!!
|
44.738 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Tue Oct 02 1990 12:19 | 11 |
| Kenn, how much did Drewski and the gang pay you for -1. :-)
>Much better??????
No way, I could see if you thought he was a little better, but not
'much better', sorry Kenn. Another point in the Schroeder-Elway
controversy. As Mike just pointed out, Schroeder's being helped
by Mike White and is improving weekly, while Elway seems to have lost
a step or two over the years, and is on the decline.
Carlos
|
44.739 | 'nuff said?? | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:37 | 1 |
| Lets see who makes it to the Hall 'o Fame....
|
44.740 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Wed Oct 03 1990 09:25 | 7 |
| Oh noooo! Not the Elway and the H.o.F. thing again....
|
|
\|/
.....or should it be (dream)
Carlos
|
44.741 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Oct 03 1990 11:37 | 2 |
| Yeh, that is an old one from last year, but Carlos , you still
couldn't answer it ;^
|
44.742 | huh? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Wed Oct 03 1990 12:10 | 4 |
| Sorry Tim, but I'm not to sure about what it is that you want me
to answer, re.739, sounds more like a statement than a question.
Carlos
|
44.743 | OTOTW | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Wed Oct 03 1990 17:17 | 11 |
|
Well, It looks like the Raiders are ON TOP OF THE WORLD right now.
4 wins no loses and it looks like Roeder-Head is starting to improve.
Not bad for having played 3 of the 4 games at Home.
P.S How is it the Raiders Open and Close the Season at Home???
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.744 | Sorry | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Thu Oct 04 1990 06:39 | 10 |
| Carlos,
I feel that Elway is much better because he led a Denver
team that is not that spectacular to 3 Super Bowls. When your defense
allows the points that thiers did in the SB's, there is not much
any single player could do about it. Although I have always been
a Schroeder fan, I don't believe that he has played to his abilities.
If the Raiders had Elway they would be almost unstoppable. It's
just my oppinion.
Kenn
|
44.745 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Oct 04 1990 08:08 | 22 |
| re: Why the Raiders open and close on at home? Why not?
Besides the Raiders, the Falcons, Patriots, Bengals, Skins, Bears and
Saints do to.
Opening and closing on the road are the Colts, Rams, Jets, Steelers,
Chargers, Eagles and Niners.
Opening at home and closing on the road are the Bills, Packers, Chiefs,
Browns, Cowboys, Lions and Giants.
Opening on the road and closing at home are the Broncos, Oilers,
Dolphins, Vikings, Cardinals, Seahawks and Bucs.
There are 7 teams in each category.
No grand conspiracy here. The NFL does try to balance out the schedule
with a couple of exceptions due to weather. For example, Phoenix
opened with 3 straight road games and closes with 3 straight home
games.
John
|
44.746 | They should be unstopable soon | NEST::PAPIA | | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:49 | 7 |
|
I think when the Raiders get Bo they will be unstopable!!!
The defense is going to have to respect Bo, so with the speed
they have at WR they will be real hard to stop.
Vinny
|
44.747 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in 1991 | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:52 | 7 |
| re .746:
With the KC Royals season now over, how soon is Bo expected to be in the
Raiders' lineup?
py
|
44.748 | | STARVU::MACGREGOR | DECview3D engineer - DTN 287-3318 | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:53 | 3 |
| Bo's return is due in 10 days or so. Week 6.
The Wizard
|
44.749 | Bo's gonna know Superbowls ! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Thu Oct 04 1990 13:18 | 7 |
| If the Raiders keep playing at their present level, or better due
to the return of Bo, Howie and Dyal, they could very possibly have
Superbowl victories in three decades. Giving new meaning to the
term threepeat.
Carlos
|
44.751 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Oct 04 1990 13:56 | 4 |
| Wrong note Steven. All discussions about the bet Dan and I
allegedly made are to be conducted in the PittsburgH Pirate note.
/Don
|
44.753 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:21 | 2 |
| Public Drunkeness? You mean you can be arrested for that?
8^)
|
44.754 | oh, man... | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:53 | 8 |
| RE: Three Super Bowls in three decades.
I see Carlos has been taking night courses at the Hal Whitehair
Institute for Pathetic Rationalization.
Granted just winning 3 Super Bowls is a nifty achievement but
comparing winning one every 10 years to winning 3 in a row is pushing
it a shade; wouldn't you say?
|
44.755 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | Four down and No O J_e | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:07 | 8 |
| >> I see Carlos has been taking night courses at the Hal Whitehair
>> Institute for Pathetic Rationalization.
Better (tm) that before somebody beats you to it.
JaKe
|
44.756 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Oct 04 1990 20:21 | 5 |
| It's that time aghain Raider fans. Bo returns. Other than an
occasional respectable game and crowd pleasing run here and there,
I ask this simple question. So what?
BoB
|
44.757 | Bo Is Awesome! | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Oct 05 1990 08:35 | 9 |
| Bo ran for over 900 yards last year in 10 games. He averaged over
5 yards a carry as well. How come people try to belittle everything
that Bo does. If he played 16 games a year he would be the best
back in football!!!!!!!!!!!! I can't name a back that has the
combination of speed an power that Bo has.
I like the Raiders by 1 this weekend, 21-20.
Kenn
|
44.758 | Thats what!!! | NEST::PAPIA | | Fri Oct 05 1990 08:53 | 7 |
|
1989 Att. Yds. Avg. Lng. Tds
Jackson,Bo 173 950 5.5 t92 4
10 games 5th in the AFC in rushing.
|
44.760 | Buffalo by 8 | CAM::MAZUR | It ain't the meat, it's the lotion. | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:18 | 9 |
| You may ask why are the Raiders getting three points against the
Bills ?
Because they'll need every one (and more).
Buffalo by 8 !
-Paul Mazur
Buffalo fan !
|
44.761 | HE plays the Blues too :^) | NEST::PAPIA | | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:19 | 7 |
|
W-L is a team effort, stats aside Bo is a walking
highlight film, the guy is unreal to watch, football
or baseball.
Vinny
|
44.762 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Two snaps, a twist, and a kiss! | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:56 | 2 |
| Go do some work Paul ... the Bills are wusses and the Silver and Black
are back !!!!!
|
44.763 | They're good but not good enough on Sunday | CAM::MAZUR | It ain't the meat, it's the lotion. | Fri Oct 05 1990 10:27 | 15 |
| > Go do some work Paul ... the Bills are wusses and the Silver and Black
> are back !!!!!
Oh, I agree that they're back. They'll probably win the division
this year but they won't win the game Sunday night. Raiders and
Bills defenses are both pretty good. That just leaves offense as
the deciding factor. But Buffalo has an advantage here. They have
an offense AND a defnese that can score. Witness the Donks game.
Pardon me for re-ascerting myself Se�or Midnight, but the Bills
by 8. I will be expecting an apology first thing Monday morning
for that 'wuss' remark.
PM
|
44.764 | Go bills...just for sunday nite of course | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Fri Oct 05 1990 11:16 | 8 |
| The faider defense can score also, just look at the faider bronco
game there. The d scored 2 td's and won the game from that, 'cause
their offense sucked. And of course the broncos were just trying to
find a way to lose the game, not win, just the same as they did in
Buffalo and almost did in the KC and seachickens games. Oh, thats
another subject.
Tim
|
44.765 | PICK OF THE WEEK | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Fri Oct 05 1990 14:47 | 6 |
| Give me a break. Buffalo a good offense and a good defense. The Raiders
defense will dominate the Bills offense. also the Raiders offense has
been getting better the last few weeks.
Los Angeles Raiders- 24
Buffalo Bills- 10
|
44.766 | WOW ! Great game !! | CAM::MAZUR | It ain't the meat, it's the lotion. | Sun Oct 07 1990 22:08 | 10 |
| >...That just leaves offense as the deciding factor. But Buffalo
>has an advantage here. They have a defense that can score...
>...Let me re-ascert myself, Buffalo by 8...
Oh geez!!! My apology. I erred. Buffalo by 14. Please accept
my apology. At least I was right about the Bills defense.
Seriously, the game was incredible. Too bad Kelso but racked up.
Till we meet in January (AFC Championship game, perhaps ?).
|
44.767 | So much for being Undefeated! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Mon Oct 08 1990 08:45 | 8 |
| Congrats to Bill fans, that was unbelievable. It was almost like
watching the Donks-Bill game all over again. Now I know how the Donk
fans must've felt getting robbed like that. The Raiders offense
and defense dominated throughout the game right up until the last
quarter, then the dam broke. Oh well, next up is the Seahawks, which
should be a close game; They always play the Raiders tough.
Carlos
|
44.768 | I'm all smiles!!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Mon Oct 08 1990 09:12 | 1 |
|
|
44.769 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | DahlingItsBettaDownWhereItsWetta | Mon Oct 08 1990 09:59 | 3 |
| Actually teams need to find a way to let the Bills keep the ball in the
4th quarter. That way they won't score so much.
|
44.770 | Deja Vu? | BSS::JCOTANCH | Stanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!! | Mon Oct 08 1990 12:04 | 8 |
| Amazingly similar 4th quarter to last week's Bronco game. A TD by the
special teams, a TD by the defense, and a fumble by the Faiders leading
to a Bills' score. All after it seemed like the game was about over
with the Faider boys up by 10 and about 10 minutes left in the game.
The Bills scored 24 points in 6:03. Yes Faider fans, you now know how
us Bronco fans felt last week.
Joe
|
44.772 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Oct 09 1990 11:34 | 1 |
| Steven, LUV that personal name!!!!
|
44.773 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Oct 09 1990 11:54 | 12 |
| I thought there was good reasons why the Raiders lost. 1)no pass
rush; 2)throwing too much; 3)poor special teams play. Schroeder
looked great through out most of the game. Marcus was extremely
effective early, and the D held thier own. All game the announcers
said that Kelly felt he could hit Lofton deep, sure enough he did.
It was a tough loss for the Raiders. Hopefully they will be able
to slow down Derrick Fenner this weekend against Seattle.
Kenn
BTW- It's too bad what happened to Denver last night isn't it???
HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!HA!
|
44.774 | Marcus To The 49ers???? | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Wed Oct 10 1990 09:27 | 9 |
| In todays National Sports Page, reports state that the 49ers are
talking to the Raiders about aquiring Marcus Allen. The 49ers offered
thier 1st round pick next year, while the Raiders are asking for
a starting player. My guess would be Ronnie Lott. It also states
that the Raiders would like to wait til' Monday to make any deal.
I would like to think that the Raiders would be intersred in obtain-
ing an OL or a LB in a trade.
Kenn
|
44.775 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Wed Oct 10 1990 09:34 | 2 |
| The trading deadline is nexted Tuesday I think.
Denny
|
44.776 | #1 -n- #2 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Thu Oct 11 1990 13:46 | 14 |
| According to yesterdays USA Today, Jay Schroeder is the AFC's best
rated QB. .....I know, I know.. stats don't mean a thing, but last
years stats for Jay were sad, and so was he....but not this year,
his stats have improved greatly and so has he. The biggest change
seems to be his self confidence, he also has more patience. (although
this might be because the O-line has also improved and is giving him
more time.) The biggest problem Jay has now is not Jay's problem,
but the receivers', they seem to me, to be dropping a lot of passes that
are well thrown, and should be caught. Unfortunately, this goes
against Jay as an incomplete pass. Another impressive stat, is the
Raiders defense, rated #2 in the AFC. They say that defense wins games,
so the Raiders ought to win a lot more this season, with this defense.
Carlos
|
44.777 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Oct 12 1990 07:14 | 3 |
| To show how much the 'top rated Qb' stat means:
Steve Grogan had the honor after the 1st 3 weeks.
Denny
|
44.778 | any news? | BSS::MENDEZ | | Fri Oct 12 1990 16:34 | 6 |
| Has anybody heard anymore information on whether Marcus Allen will be
traded to the 49ers?
Frank 9er Mendez
|
44.779 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Oct 12 1990 16:52 | 8 |
| The Allen trade was still just rumor as of yesterday afternoon.
Raiders want a starter or 1st round pick. Meanwhile they
get a bargain for a back who's better days are behind him.
They also eliminate Marcus from the turmoil picture that Bo's
return will bring.
Sounds like Al too. He's seen his best days as well.
BoB
|
44.780 | | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Sat Oct 13 1990 10:39 | 12 |
| The Raiders asked for Charles Haley in return for Allen. Everybody
seems to feel that the Raiders are asking for too much when they
want a starter for Allen in a trade. Hershall Walker is worth 3
#1's, 3-players, and a couple of other draft picks and Marcus is
only worth 1 #1 from a championship team??????? Walker is 28 and
Allen is 30.NO, I don't think that Walker was worth what the Vikings
paid for him, however I do believe that Marcus is worth more than
the 25th-28th pick in the draft.
I like the Raiders this week 17-14.
Kenn
|
44.781 | RAIDERS 24-SEAHAWKS 17. | WLDWST::LSUSTAITA | | Mon Oct 15 1990 01:28 | 8 |
| Go RAIDERS on a roll 5-1, SAN DIAGO IS NEXT.
RAIDERS 24
CHARGERS 10
SILVER AND BLACK ARE BACK!
later dudes......
|
44.782 | Where's Bo? | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Mon Oct 15 1990 08:38 | 8 |
| Did Bo Jackson make his comeback this week?
John
|
44.783 | .833 pct. | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Mon Oct 15 1990 10:45 | 7 |
| Not yet. Bo should make his debut this weekend against the Chargers.
The Raiders are 3-0 within the division, but should have a tough
game against San Diego. Raiders will win it though, 'cause the defense
is playing good and so is the offense. The Chargers play great one
week and sad the next. Raiders by +10.
Carlos
|
44.784 | | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Mon Oct 15 1990 14:00 | 20 |
| With the Broncos playing as poorly as they are I've noticed a
significant decline in replies in this conference. Credit must be
given to the Raiders for thier outstanding play. Schroeder is playing
better and better each week, and what more can be said about the
offensive line. Everyone wanted to write Max Montoya off when the
Raiders signed him saying he is over the hill. Now all he's doing
is proving everyone wrong. Allowing 10 sacks in 6 games is great,
and if I'm not mistaken, they allowed six in the game against the
Bears.
As much as I ripped Willie Gault he is sure making me put my foot
in my mouth. The guy is playing great. Is there any news on when
Gary Lewis is coming back??? Lets just hope that they continue palying
as well as they have, and hope that K.C. drops off a little.
Kenn
Raiders 24
Chargers 21
|
44.785 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | Vom Hochland German Shepherds | Mon Oct 15 1990 16:05 | 5 |
| Kenn, it appears as if you're expecting a pretty good game this week
when the Raiders travel down to San Diego. A 24-21 victory for the
Raiders sounds like a pretty close game. I hope it is.
Live from Charger Central.....Glenn
|
44.786 | | REFINE::ASHE | Homey don't play that... | Mon Oct 15 1990 16:25 | 1 |
| How long is Mike Dyal out?
|
44.787 | Lets hope Glenn. | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Mon Oct 15 1990 18:03 | 4 |
| As long as the Charger o-line protects Billy-Joe, then it will be
close IMO.
Tim
|
44.788 | Marcus taught Bo everything he knows. | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | In God we trust | Tue Oct 16 1990 09:31 | 10 |
| re. Dyal, He got hurt around the first or second game and was placed
on IR, which typically lasts six weeks, so he'll probably return
around the 8th week along with Howie. In other Raiders news, Dennis
Price cornerback was traded to the Jets for Alex Gordon linebacker.
Glad to see they didn't trade Marcus Allen, he's one of those rare
talents that can run, block, catch, and pass. Plus, I love it when
the Raiders are on the goal line and Marcus goes flying over the
top for the TD.
Carlos
|
44.789 | Trade Looks Good For The Raiders | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Oct 16 1990 11:40 | 15 |
| It's hard to believe that the Jets already gave up on Gordon. He
was so highly thought of coming out of college. I think that it
is a good move for the silver and black. There is talk that Greg
Bell my be put on the IR to make room for Bo. Bell sprained his
ankle last week.
Carlos, I agree that its better that they don't trade Marcus at
this point. The team is playing to well to start dealing key
contributors away.
Glenn, I do believe that this will be a close game. S.D. has under-
achieved all year. Maybe last week was thier coming out party. All
of the AFC West divisional games seem to be close.
Kenn
|
44.790 | Trade | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Wed Oct 17 1990 06:14 | 4 |
| The Raiders traded Vann McElroy to the Seahawks for an undisclosed
draft pick.
Kenn
|
44.791 | | REFINE::ASHE | Homey don't play that... | Wed Oct 17 1990 11:11 | 1 |
| Did Bell go on the IR?
|
44.792 | Sorry, Walt | MPO::MCFALL | He was born a pauper to a pawn | Wed Oct 17 1990 11:46 | 7 |
| > Did Bell go on the IR?
Officially, not yet. Rumor is that he will be put on it to make
room for Bo, but it may not happen until Friday or Saturday.
Jim M
|
44.793 | thanks... | REFINE::ASHE | Homey don't play that... | Wed Oct 17 1990 11:56 | 4 |
| That's pretty inconsiderate, considering my supplemental draft is
tonight and only guys on IR are allowed...
-Walt
|
44.794 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | I came, I saw, I freaked out | Wed Oct 17 1990 16:42 | 1 |
| I Bo gonna start? An inquiring ffl owner wants to know.
|
44.795 | That's a definite maybe.... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Oct 18 1990 08:59 | 6 |
| Bo will probably play, but don't know if he'll be starting. Howie
Long might also play this Sunday. He went out around week 2 with
a broken toe and was expected to miss about six games.
Carlos
|
44.796 | Wheres Bruce Wilkerson? | NEST::PAPIA | | Thu Oct 18 1990 09:02 | 8 |
|
If they traded McElroy then that should be an open spot
for Bo. When Gordon,Long and Dyal come off IR then someone
will have to go. Whats the story with Wilkerson? is he out
for the year?
Vinny
|
44.797 | | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Thu Oct 18 1990 09:49 | 4 |
| Wilkerson is supposed to see action this week against the Chargers.
Kenn
|
44.798 | 6-1 | 17135::CGRIEGO | | Mon Oct 22 1990 09:23 | 8 |
|
Marcus Allen caught three passes for 50-yds and rushed eight times
for 45-yds to help send the Raiders past the Chargers, 24-9. Bo
Jackson in his return from baseball, rushed for 53-yds and two
touchdowns. And Jay Schroeder hit Willie Gault for an 8-yd touchdown.
The Raiders defense held San Diego to three field goals.
Carlos
|
44.799 | Bo Knows TD's! | 26748::KHARRIS | | Mon Oct 22 1990 11:53 | 10 |
| The Schroeder critics keep eating crow. His numbers are consistent
week in and week out. I don't like the idea of a week off before
K.C. though. When things are going good you don't need to break
it up. Bo comes in and does his usual run around the corner that
noone seems to be able to stop. The offensive line is playing great.
Aarron Wallace had a sack as well as Scott Davis. the young kids
are playing well. Having K.C. fall 2 games behind is a big plus,
thank you Seattle.
Kenn
|
44.800 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Oct 23 1990 15:11 | 4 |
| Well, we finally found something Bo don't know.
Bo don't know english.
BoB
|
44.801 | Bo has a real problem speaking. | ELWOOD::DLANE | Build it and he will come | Tue Oct 23 1990 15:22 | 7 |
|
Actually, Bo Jackson has a real speech impediment. His commercials
take many many takes to get them right.
dana
|
44.802 | It used to be worse.... | SHARRA::J_PARSONS | George Stark: Not A Very Nice Guy | Tue Oct 23 1990 15:38 | 3 |
| I can certainly attest to Bo's speech impediment, since I was in a sophomore
psychology class with him at Auburn around 1982. Actually, he speaks much better
now than he did then.
|
44.803 | Raiderology 101 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Wed Oct 24 1990 13:53 | 43 |
| My predictions for the Raiders for the remainder of the season:
at KC The Chiefs are playing tough, and I figure
that the Raiders are gonna split with them
this year. Each winning at home.
Green Bay Unlike most AFC teams, the Raiders don't
have a problem with NFC teams, as they
they are equally as big and tough on the
lines and like to run the ball. Raiders
will win this by at least 7.
at Miami (Mon.) Talk about '70's flashbacks, better break
out the bell-bottoms for this one. Raiders
have the best Monday Night record around,
but both teams are playing great this year.
Flip a coin.
KC again See above.
at Denver The Donks are hurting so far....but......
...with Magoo who knows. The Raiders should
win theoretically. But again flip a coin.
at Detroit (Mon.) Bo Jackson and Marcus Allen should have
a field day against the Lions struggling
defense. Raiders by +10.
Cincinnati Last year the Raiders creamed the Bengals
28-7. Should be interesting to see how
well Max Montoya does against his old
team mates. The Bengals defense is the
worst in the AFC so far....Raiders by +7.
at Minnesota Raiders by 3.
San Diego Upset city....Chargers by 3.
Raiders end up around 11-5, and win the AFC West, and go on to win
the Superbowl in a blowout over none other than SF.
Carlos
|
44.804 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | I love Kraf dinner!! | Wed Oct 24 1990 14:48 | 9 |
| >>Raiders end up around 11-5, and win the AFC West, and go on to win
>>the Superbowl in a blowout over none other than SF.
Carlos,
I'll send you my address and a check for whatever them drugs u is on
are worth. %^)
The Ratters (tm) will be gone by the first round of the playoffs.
|
44.805 | | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Wed Oct 24 1990 15:52 | 5 |
| I agree with Carlos! Nobody else is rising above the ashes in the AFC.
Besides, the Raiders are the only team in the AFC that can beat the
49ers in non-exhibition play.
Mike
|
44.806 | not sure, but | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:06 | 1 |
| Joe and his EGO didn't play in that exihibit game did they?
|
44.807 | Raiders Are For Real! | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:23 | 14 |
| There looks to be only one team in the AFC that the Raiders should
be concerned with at this point, and that is Buffalo. They have
a great D and thier offense is capable of putting up some big points.
I don't know if Miami is for real yet. An earlier note pointed out
the play of Lionel Washington and I must agree that he is very
underrated. The Raiders stole him from St. Louis for i believe was
a 3rd round pick. I would like to see the Raiders get another safety
to go along with Eddie Anderson. Haqrden is alright but there is
room for improvement.
Home field will be a key in the playoffs, I don't think that they
want to go play in Buffalo that late in the year. Lets go RAIDERS!!
Kenn
|
44.808 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | I love Kraf dinner!! | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:28 | 2 |
| As much as I hate the Ratters (tm), it is kinda refreshing to see an
AFC team be dominant. 1 question. How long 'til the bubble bursts.
|
44.809 | Bo's gonna know Superbowls !! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:06 | 11 |
| >There looks to be only one team in the AFC that the Raiders should
>be concerned with at this point, and that is Buffalo.
I disagree. Houston, KC, Miami, and Buffalo are all playing well.
And Piitsburgh looks like they may wake up in time to get into the
playoffs as well. Of these I think that Houston, KC, or Miami will
be contending with the Raiders for the AFC Championship. And of
these only The Raiders, Oilers, and Chiefs can compete with the
NFC Champ.
Carlos
|
44.810 | pining for the way it used to be... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lou Duffy's looking for change, spare change | Thu Oct 25 1990 13:11 | 8 |
|
I don't know about that Carlos, Pittsburg just gave the 49 ers all they could
handle defensively. If it wasn't for a blackout and a costly fumble they're
right there in the last two minutes of the game with a chance to win it.
Really wouldn't it be great to see a Pitt/Raiders AFC championship game???
mike
|
44.811 | Dolphins improved, but still inconsistent | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in 1991 | Thu Oct 25 1990 13:14 | 8 |
| re the notes on Miami:
It'll depend on which Dolphin team shows up; the one that handled
Buffalo with no problem, or the one that just squeaked by a struggling
New England team.
py
|
44.812 | We'll Find Out | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Thu Oct 25 1990 14:14 | 15 |
| I don't feel that Miami has a consistent enough ground game to last
in the playoffs. No ball control usually spells problems. I like
Pittsburghs' D but I'm not to crazy about thier offense. Hoge and
Worely will have to get it going again to be a force come playoff
time. Kansas City has a tough D but they don't have any wide receivers
to speak of. They have one of the leagues most dangerous backs in
Okoye, but I feel that they lack team speed on offense. I feel Buffalo
has a good D, Speed on offense, and a good running game. If they
play consistently I definatley feel that they will be the Raiders
toughesty opponent. Thats my own oppinion though. The jury is still
out on Houston and the run and shoot. Can you last in the playoffs
without a ground game???? I don't think so. I feel that Cincinnati
poses more of a threat than Houston.
Kenn
|
44.813 | Houston never will win the Central, eh Doc! | SNDBOX::HAUSRATH | Too many projects, not enough time | Thu Oct 25 1990 15:27 | 8 |
|
I agree with Kenn, even though Houston buried Cincy in their first
meeting they should still be considered favorites to take the Central
and advance to the championship game. All depends which team shows up
come playoff time. After all they've got a LOT of home games coming
stretch time (last place schedule helps too!).
/Jeff
|
44.814 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Thu Oct 25 1990 16:47 | 17 |
| >The jury is still out on Houston and the run and shoot. Can you
>last in the playoffs without a ground game?? I don't think so.
>I feel that Cincinnati poses more of a threat than Houston.
Au contraire mon fraire, Houston has proven that the run and shoot
works. They have the best offense in the NFL right now. The biggest
difference between Cinci and the Oilers is not the offense (they
both have great offenses) but, the defense, Cinci don't have one.
As far as the ease of Cinci's schedule goes, three of their last
five are on the road against Pitts, Raiders, and Houston and the
other two home games are against San Fran. and Cleavland, not an
easy schedule by any stretch. I agree with you about Miami's ground
game, they started out real good but now they ain't nothing, it's
been their defense thats been winning them for Miami lately.
Carlos
|
44.815 | Watched too much "Back to the Beach" last night.... | DECWET::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Thu Oct 25 1990 16:52 | 22 |
|
Most totally true dude. While Detroit proved that the Run and Shoot is a
viable offense for the NFL (despite the protestations of Bill "super genius"
Walsh) Houston has taken it a step further due to their most excellent QB and
a bodacious set of wide receivers. If Houston had a RB of Barry Sanders quality
( like they are a dime a dozen right ) they would be almost totally unstoppable.
Even with the RB's they have now they are cranking up an offensive machine that
Jerry "glad he's gone" Glanville could only have wet dreams about.
However detroit has also proven that you still need a second half of a team
called a defense to win consistantly. Cinci will second this fact. The
Oilers are going to go through the Jests like a hot knife through frozen
Yogurt and the Psuh-for-Youth will ride Givins and Hill to another FFL B
victory...
I take back what I said about Warren Moon earlier this year. He has adjusted
well to the R & S. I just hope the pounding doesn't take too much time off
of his career. He isn't getting crushed as much as Peete et al because the
Oilers leave their RB's in to block more than Detroit..
Metz
|
44.816 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Thu Oct 25 1990 17:19 | 21 |
| Thanks for that lasted paragraph Metz, you reminded me of something I
neglected to mention in the Oiler note :
The RB's, White in particular , were AWESOME blocking against the
Bengals two weeks ago. Countless times I saw Francis coming in on the
blitz, only to be picked up flawlessly by White, giving Moon that extra
half-second.
The Oiler's ground game is still somewhat disappointing, but improving.
Thank God Moon is a super-mobile QB (2nd on the team in rushing, and
averaging 4.8 yrds a carry) ....
As for the Lions - Barry Sanders is a great RB, but the fack of the
matter is that he is only an adquate blocker at best. Part of the
problem is that he's 5'9", and while very string for his size, some
LB's have been known to jump over him on a blitz. Another factor is the
fact that he takes enough hits running, and you know that has to take
something out of you.
Now if you want to talk about the ultimate run and shoot back, let's
talk about Walter Payton - he'd be illegal in it .....
|
44.817 | | BOSOX::KHARRIS | | Fri Oct 26 1990 07:46 | 5 |
| I feel that Marcus Allen would be the prototype R&S back as well.
I hate to be redundent but I can't see the R & S being that effective
in cold weather. We'll wait and see though.
Kenn
|
44.818 | my man Neal... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Never, hear surf music again... | Fri Oct 26 1990 07:48 | 13 |
|
I don't know Doc, I think Neal Anderson would be even more illegal than
Payton in a R&S. If you remember last year, Detroit really didn't crank
up the running game with Sanders until the last half of the season when
defense were to concerned with the pass. I think we'll see the same thing
in Houston. Teams are going to be so geared to stopping their passing
attack the run will just be there. Especially when you consider Houston's
OL, they should be able to run...
and as the owner of Moon in the WAFFLE, I couldn't be happier. Especially
considering 6 other QB's went before he did....
mike
|
44.819 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Oct 26 1990 07:57 | 10 |
| <<< Note 44.814 by ELMAGO::CGRIEGO "Trust Jesus " >>>
> As far as the ease of Cinci's schedule goes, three of their last
> five are on the road against Pitts, Raiders, and Houston and the
> other two home games are against San Fran. and Cleavland, not an
> easy schedule by any stretch.
The first Cincinnati-Houston game was shifted to Houston, I thought,
because of the Reds' post-season experience. If so, then the next
one will be played in Cincinnati.
|
44.820 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Fri Oct 26 1990 10:06 | 18 |
| re .819
Correct.
re .818
Mike, Anderson may be a better pure runner than Payton - certainly
faster, but that can be said of many backs. I think that Payton's
blocking and recieving skills would make him extremely lethal in the
run and shoot. Anderson isn't 1-D, but he doesn't pancake linebackers
the way I've seen Payton do it .... and yes, Marcus Allen is another
back who would roll up some great numbers in a run and shoot.
OJ Simpson ? I might lose something in blocking, but giving the Juice a
broken field on every play to operate in ? It ain't fair ....
BTW, I don't worry about the run and shoot on a cold day, it's the
*windy* days that worry any passing game, believe me ....
|
44.821 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Never, hear surf music again... | Fri Oct 26 1990 10:27 | 8 |
|
Yeah Doc, maybe he doesn't pancake people with his blocking but he doesn't
have too, to be effective and he's a very effective blocker. Receiving I'd
say they're equal. Of the backs around the league now, I think that Cleveland
Gary would really put up some super numbers with it and it would probably
rescue/save Eric Metcalf's career...
mike
|
44.822 | ? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Fri Oct 26 1990 10:59 | 10 |
| >He isn't getting crushed as much as Peete et al.......
Why aren't the Lions utilizing Heisman Trophy winner Andre Ware?
If he's their QB of the future it would seem like a good idea to
get him in there and let him get some experience against NFL caliber
defenses. The sooner he's in the middle of things, the faster he
will come up to speed. I was hoping that the Raiders would've picked
up Ware at the beggining of the season.
Carlos
|
44.824 | Smash the pumpkin (tm) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Never, hear surf music again... | Fri Oct 26 1990 11:23 | 13 |
|
> Besides, they play real defense in the NFL.
Correct amundo Steven and 8 years later Big Bad John still doesn't know how
to read one....
;^)
|
44.826 | I see steven is a big simpsons fan also ???? | DECWET::METZGER | Quoth the raven,"Eat my shorts" | Fri Oct 26 1990 12:09 | 11 |
|
They brought Ware in for a few series 2 weeks ago. I think It'll take him
some time to get used to Detroit's R & S offense and get in sync with the
recievers they have there....
Either that he or he hopelessly overrated as a QB :-)
It will be sink or swim time for him next year....
Metz
|
44.827 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Fri Oct 26 1990 12:56 | 21 |
| re .824
Good shot !
The run and shoot takes a long time to master - and the Lions are in no
hurry to rush him. There are a lot more defenses in the NFL to master
than in college.
re Mike,
Glanville, to his credit, wanted Metcalf in the draft, but the Oilers
went for defense. Oh well .....
But he would be tough in that offense, not that strong between the
tackles, or blocking, but he'd be greased lighting ...
Idea : Why doesn't some team bring back Don Coryell as an O.C. ??? He
can't coach defense to save his life (San Fran should give the Chargers
some SB rings (remember Dean, Keltcher, and Johnson ?)), but the man
could bulid an offense, and with the exception of James Brooks, knew
how to get the most out of his talent.
|
44.828 | Just Win Baby!!!!!!! | ROYALT::FORGET | | Tue Oct 30 1990 13:57 | 8 |
|
Are Boys the Raiders will be taking on the Chiefs this Sunday.
It should be an exciting games. The Raiders will be on top.....
Mike
|
44.829 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Thu Nov 01 1990 11:50 | 1 |
| The girls in black are going' down to the scalpers!!!!!!!
|
44.830 | Raid, Pillage, and Plunder! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Fri Nov 02 1990 13:56 | 12 |
| The only ones goin down (for the fifth time) are those Donk sissys! :-)
Raiders 7-1
KC 4-4
Seattle 4-4
Donks 3-5
SD 3-6
Carlos
|
44.831 | Raiders still lead the division, though | MPO::MCFALL | She's myyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy baby | Mon Nov 05 1990 08:57 | 17 |
| > Raiders 7-1 X
> KC 4-4 X
> Seattle 4-4 X
> Donks 3-5 C
> SD 3-6 X
Carlos, one out of 5 ain't bad :^)
Raiders 6-2
Chiefs 5-3
Chargers 4-5
Broncos 3-5
Seahawks 3-5
Better luck next week,
Jim M
|
44.832 | good game sunday morn, had good ending to | 8269::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Mon Nov 05 1990 15:53 | 1 |
| I guess Bo knows fumbles ;^^
|
44.833 | Oh well...we're still #1 ! | 17135::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Tue Nov 06 1990 10:01 | 15 |
| Congrats to Chief fans. I figured the Raiders would have a hard
time in K.C. (see .803). After watching the game I gotta say that
the Raider Defense is the baddest, holding the Chiefs to 32 total
yds in the first half, and holding them to 3 field goals, 2 of which
were a direct result of an offensive fumble (ala Bo), and a blocked
punt (ala Lewis?) which turned the ball over to K.C. with excellent
field position in the first half. The third also resulted from a turn
over late in the game. The Raiders were just about to score again
when they turned the ball over, and KC took it back far enough to score
the last field goal. The weather was a definite factor for both
teams on Sunday; It was cold and rainy. I think if the Raiders would
have run the ball a little more than they did they could have won
it.(JMHO) Raiders will win the Pack by 7.
Carlos
|
44.834 | Its in LA, right? | 8269::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Nov 06 1990 14:12 | 5 |
| re-1 Should be a good game against the Pack. If the Pack can get
any kind of running game going, then the boys from LA will lose, and if
they don't then ????
Tim
|
44.835 | | 17135::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Tue Nov 06 1990 15:14 | 14 |
| Tim, It will be played in L.A.. As far as the Packs running game
goes, is Brent Fullwood still their leading rusher? Also, I don't
think that the Raiders Defense will have to terribly of a tough
time containing any running game that the Pack has as they are not
the greatest rushing team around. My point is that if they can stop
K.C.'s Okoye, Chicago's Anderson, S.D.'s Butts (no punn intended), Denver's
Humphrey, Seattle's Fenner, and Buffalo's Thomas, which are among
the best in the league, then G.B.'s running attack should be pretty
much kept in check. The key as I see it will be for the Raiders
to keep the pressure on Majik. Schroeder and the receiving corps should
have a good day against G.B. as well as Bo, Marcus, and Smith.
Carlos
|
44.836 | | 6214::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Nov 06 1990 15:58 | 2 |
|
Fullwood is on the Browns now.
|
44.837 | | 17135::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Wed Nov 07 1990 09:43 | 3 |
| No wonder they're doing so good. :-)
Carlos
|
44.838 | | 17135::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Wed Nov 07 1990 09:47 | 4 |
| But seriuosly folks, Who's carrying the ball for the Pack ? Woodside?
Fontenot? or maybe the rookies Thompson or Jackson maybe?????
Carlos
|
44.839 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Mon Nov 12 1990 11:27 | 12 |
| Well...the Raiders got stomped by the Packers...and it was ugly.
The offense was terrible, the defense was OK. The Raiders got their
'bye' on the eighth week and decided to take an extra two weeks
off. Somebody switched this years model of Schroeder for last years.
He has stats that would make Elway proud.....Cmp-Att-Int 11-23-3 139-yds.
The running game wasn't around. Howie Long did good against Mandarich.
I hope the Raiders can snap back to pre-bye form in time for the
Sardines next Monday. Oh well ....at least the Donks and the Chiefs
lost. Raiders are still #1 in the west!
Carlos
|
44.840 | Howie is tough. | BSS::MENDEZ | | Mon Nov 12 1990 15:55 | 4 |
| I thought that Townsend was lined up against Mandarich. I did
see however that Lond had his way with some lineman named Keith
Euker. I saw one play where Howie just took one hand and flattened
Euker.
|
44.841 | Keep your heads low, mine is.... | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Nov 13 1990 12:03 | 5 |
| The faiders are starting to do just that;^ The second half of the
season slide that I predicted. I was off by 1-2 losses, but after the
fish beat 'em next Monday, then KC and LA will be tied for #1 in west.
Tim
|
44.842 | | BSS::G_MCINTOSH | ULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CS | Tue Nov 13 1990 12:10 | 10 |
| > but after the fish beat 'em next Monday, then KC and LA
> will be tied for #1 in west.
>
> Tim
Tim, won't KC lose to SD? That would mean....
Raid 6-4
SD 6-5
KC 5-5
etc...
|
44.843 | A little salt for your wounds? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Tue Nov 13 1990 13:44 | 17 |
| Two things are for certain, next week the Raiders will still be
on top of the division (maybe in a tie??????, but doubtful) and
the Donks will still be dead last after getting thrashed by the
Bears. :-)
Raiders #1
KC
SD } ?
Seattle
Denver dead last...
Carlos
|
44.844 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Tue Nov 13 1990 22:34 | 6 |
| I thought the return of Bo was all they needed to fire up
the presses for Bowl tickets. What gives?
BoB
Who_still_sees_Denver_at_Denver_on_Raider_schedule.
|
44.845 | Maybe Bo's gotta go ?? | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Wed Nov 14 1990 08:59 | 7 |
| I've been kinda wondering about Bo too. Maybe he's not such a great
deal after all. The Raiders are something like 13-16 when Bo starts.
I didn't see the SD game but, against KC and GB he wasn't very
impressive. Matter of fact I think the Raiders running game was
doing alot better with Allen and Bell. IMO.
Carlos
|
44.846 | Gone fishin ! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Thu Nov 15 1990 17:06 | 19 |
|
0\ /0
\ _______ /
\| | |/
| ----- |
|| * ^ ||
|| ` ||
|| = || /
/ ----- \ / |
/ | \ / |
| / |
--------------- / ^
| | / ( )
/ / \ /\ \ / /_\
/ / \ / \ \ /
| | \ \______ /__
\________|___|
|
44.847 | | SUPVAX::KERMIT | halp, i'f falin an aye kant geddup | Thu Nov 15 1990 19:52 | 4 |
| re.846
Tha onlee fiche tha raderz wil cach is pokket troudt.
|
44.848 | BIG GAME! | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Nov 16 1990 07:42 | 8 |
| This is the biggest game of the year so far the Raiders. The loss to GB
should not have happened. It's time that the running game gets going.
This should be a close game right down to the wire. I think that the
Raiders will win, 24-21. With Clayton out Miami doesn't have the
receiving threats it usually has, and hopefully Tony Paige is banged
up. The team must run for Schroeder to be effective. LETS GO RAIDERS!!!
Kenn
|
44.849 | Fish have #1 D!!!! | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Fri Nov 16 1990 11:40 | 6 |
| The difference will be at QB, and we all know who is better....
I'm trying to cut out the salt please;^
Tim
|
44.850 | I doubt it..... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Fri Nov 16 1990 12:10 | 14 |
| Speaking of salt, the Sardines #1 'D' can be taken with a grain of
salt, considering they've played the Patriots twice, the Jets twice,
Phoenix, Indy, and Pittsburgh (before the offense woke up). They've
really only played two tough teams, one of them they blew away and
the other they got blown away. However, in their defense, I guess
it should be noted that the Jets have a decent offense, and the
Cards have a good running game. The Dolphins are calling their 'D'
the 'Make Believe Defense' because after you play them they make
you believe. While this name is very cute and whimsical, I'm afraid
I'll have to be like the apostle Thomas, and wait 'til I see it
before I believe.
Carlos
|
44.851 | And the plot thickens..... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Mon Nov 19 1990 15:08 | 7 |
| With a loss tonight the Raiders would find themselves in a tie
for first with KC, but a win will give them a one game lead and
a good chance of extending it to two after next week. The Dolphins
also need a win tonight to keep up with the Bills. Looking forward
to a good game!
Carlos
|
44.852 | Raiders Win a Big One...Need Next week to Cruise | KIDVAX::MBROOKS | | Tue Nov 20 1990 09:13 | 5 |
| Was a great game, all the Raiders have to do now is beat KC this week
and they all but own the Division Title.....I hope that Houston can
beat Buffalo this week and that will put the raiders Closer to taken
the 2nd division title and they wont have to play an extra game
against a wild card team....
|
44.853 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Nov 20 1990 15:02 | 7 |
| In the place of Monty, The refs gave it to 'em with the ball
spotting and non-call for a late hit and anything else that I forgot;^
It was a good game though. The Faider D-line came through with
pressure.
Tim
|
44.854 | | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Tue Nov 20 1990 15:11 | 12 |
| It was nice to finally be able to watch a game on TV. I live in New
Hampshire and the only time we see the Raiders is when they're on
Sunday or Monday night. The game was entertaining to watch, However,
I don't understand why Miami didn't run the no huddle offense all game.
The only time they really moved the ball was when Marino was in the
shotgun and they had a 4 wide receiver set. Townsend, Davis, and
Washington played extremely well on "D". While the "O"Line, Bo, and
Marcus did an outstanding job. I only wish that we would be able to get
next weeks game also.
Kenn
|
44.855 | | STARVU::MACGREGOR | Three time GutterBall champion!! | Tue Nov 20 1990 15:33 | 17 |
| Only got to see the first half, but what a half. The Raiders moved
the ball with relative ease until the 10 yard line, then it was
very difficult. They were inside the 20 3 times in the first half
and came away with only 10 points. Credit the Miami line for coming
through when it counted.
2 minutes and change left in the first half and it is Raiders 140
or so yard to Miamis' 3 yards. Then comes Marino and his deadly
2 minute drill to pull them within 3 at 10-7.
Really enjoyed seeing Allen, Jackson, and Smith rack up the yards
against the "#1 defense" HAHAHA who has Miami played so far. Shroeder
(spelling?) did well in the first half, going something like 5 for
7 with one of the two missed balls a drop by Gault. Good game.
First Raider game I've been able to see this year.
The Wizard
|
44.856 | The way Hoot and Monty see the game | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Burley from biking | Tue Nov 20 1990 16:51 | 6 |
| The game was a farce. The Raiders employed the Shell "death grip" all night.
They got caught a couple of times. I couldn't beleive that Miami call in
the 3rd quarter for tripping Howie Long that clumsy ox fell down after grabbing the
the OT's Jersey.
Jeff (parrot)
|
44.857 | Raider Beat Miami no ?'s asked | KIDVAX::MBROOKS | | Wed Nov 21 1990 09:12 | 8 |
| The Raiders just Outright Outplayed the Dolphins, the 1st half score
should have been 17-0, the Skins are lucky that they wernt embaressad
The Raiders proved there a team to deal with, looking forward to see
were they land in the playoffs. 3rd place division is only as good
as 1st Wildcard spot....Will be intresting to see who takes 2nd place
division championship !!!
Mike
|
44.858 | "BIG GAME" | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Nov 23 1990 06:39 | 11 |
| Another big game for the Raiders. They must get the running game going
early as they did against Miami. They shut down KC's Offense in KC,
hopefully they can do it again. Gault, Fernandez and Brown must hold on
to the ball. If they can win this one it will put them up 2 games in
the division. I like the Raiders by 3.
Raiders 13
Chiefs 10
Kenn
|
44.859 | Raiders Dropp an Important Close one | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Mon Nov 26 1990 07:30 | 6 |
| Raiders lost by 3 in one of the most important games to date, not
only is KC now tied with the Raiders but they are 2-0 in head to
head, which puts them very strongly in control. Next Week KC gets
to play New England (1-10) and LA plays Denver (3-8). LA needs
this win badly just to stay even.....Will have to look ahead at
both there schedules, I hope LA has some easy games ahead of them.
|
44.860 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Mon Nov 26 1990 10:39 | 19 |
| That was one of those heart breaker games that you hate to see them
lose if your a fan. It was a good game though, and I take my hat
off to K.C. fans. I think that the key for the Chiefs was the turnovers
including a blocked field goal early in the game that would have kept
the score even, and three fumbles on key drives. Schroeder has not
been very impressive this second half of the season.....I wonder how
bad his injury is? Also if Jay is out for a while and Evans gets hurt
who replaces him ? Here's a look at the Raiders and Chiefs schedule
for the remainder of the season:
L.A. K.C.
---------------------------- ---------------------------
at Denver 3-8 at New England 1-10
at Detroit (Mon.) 4-7 Denver 3-8
Cincinnati 6-5 Houston 5-5
at Minnesota (Sat.) 5-6 at San Diego 5-7
San Diego 5-7 at Chicago (Sat.) 9-2
Carlos
|
44.861 | Raiders Rule | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Tue Nov 27 1990 12:08 | 12 |
| Looks like Schroeder sprained a ligament in his left knee, and might
not be playing this weekend against the Broncs. Evans is very athletic,
but he's not that great of a QB, he likes to run alot, and has thrown
quite a bit of inty's throughout his career. So it looks like Elway
will have some competition......:-)
These inter-divisional rivalry's are usually pretty close, and I'm
sure the Broncs would just love playing spoiler, but don't count
on it.
Raiders by +7.
King Carlos,
(Official K.o.t.H.)
|
44.862 | Wax that Woodie Art baby | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Burley from biking | Tue Nov 27 1990 12:38 | 11 |
| I expect Uncle Al and his cronie Art (Turtle wax) Shell to activate
Steve Burlein. The team has no faith in Evans and will come into Mile-Hi
and humbled in the first half by the Donkeys...
The Second Half I expect the Raiders to come alive and squeak by. Only cause
Denver only plays half a game.
Jeff
|
44.863 | Don't choke the chode | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Nov 28 1990 14:17 | 9 |
| It also looks like the faiders have an easier schedule than KC does,
going by records. KC should win the division IMO.
Look for donks to give faiders more than they can handle this
weekend. LA will go to Buerlin if things go bad for Evans. If Denvers
lines control the game, then the donks will win it. They are starving
for a W now a days.
Tim
|
44.864 | BIG LICKS THIS WEEKEND!! | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Wed Nov 28 1990 15:07 | 8 |
|
Look for the Broncos to beat the Faiders and look for the Faiders to
lose 3 of the last five games of this season.
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.865 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Wed Nov 28 1990 15:18 | 23 |
| > It also looks like the faiders have an easier schedule than KC does,
> going by records. KC should win the division IMO.
If you go by records, LA's opponents are currently 23-33 and KC's
opponents are currently 23-32. KC's next game is at NE, which should
be a win, then they have 2 at home with Denver and Houston. I expect
the Chiefs to win their next 3, then the last 2 are on the road, so 4
wins in their last 5 games isn't out of the question. If that happens,
the Faids need to win all their remaining games to take the division,
which won't happen. Looking at the Faids' schedule, I don't think
they'll win more than 2 of their remaining games anyway.
> Look for donks to give faiders more than they can handle this
> weekend. LA will go to Buerlin if things go bad for Evans. If Denvers
> lines control the game, then the donks will win it. They are starving
> for a W now a days.
Denver will win this weekend. Just because the Broncos
only have 3 wins doesn't mean the Faiders will come in and get the easy
W.
Joe
|
44.866 | IMNSHFSW opinion | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | SILVER AND BLACK ARE BACK | Thu Nov 29 1990 08:06 | 3 |
| , The Raiders will dominate both sides of the lines of scrimmage and
will kill the mules. Raiders win 4 outta 5 and finish 11-5. 2 games
ahead of the squaws.
|
44.867 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Nov 29 1990 09:03 | 20 |
| Geez, I didn't realize there were still so many Donk fans around,
I was sure that by now they'd all jumped off the bandwagon...:-)
The Raiders are gonna kill the Donks this weekend, look for Elway
to fake an injury around the third quarter and bow out of the game.
Also look for Marcus and Bo to have a good day.
It's hard enough for the Donks to beat the Raiders when they're
on top of the world much less now that they sip miserably.
Read in the paper this week that Mecklenburg (sp?) said the team
was expecting a tough game against the Raiders, and that there is
no surprise to the Raiders game plan," they just try to out physical
you." Well you got that right Karl, the Raiders are gonna run right
over you! Bet you can feel them knees gettin weaker by the moment...
His majesty,
Carlos
|
44.868 | Give 'em, take 'em, whatever | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | $80,000 + a Chevy Blazer | Thu Nov 29 1990 13:02 | 5 |
| What's the spread on this game? I think the Broncos will win it
easily, both because of the history of this rivalry and that Schroeder
and the rest of the Raiders have been coming down to earth.
Dan
|
44.869 | Go Donks! | CSC32::SALZER | | Thu Nov 29 1990 13:06 | 12 |
| Last week's KC game was the biggest game the Raids have played in
many many years and what do they do? Howie Long looked rediculous.
Al looked like he just got licked in the face by a cow. Art looked
like he was going to go back to the drawing board. Marcus looked
good and Bo didn't look like anything. The Raiders are a team
in trouble. Look for Denver to salvage a season on sunday probably
by 3 points or less. A Raider loss here will have them seriously
questioning their playoff hopes all together.
BoB
|
44.870 | looking for the under | HBAHBA::HAAS | Big Smile at the Drivethrough | Thu Nov 29 1990 13:11 | 5 |
| re: spread.
Raiders still favored, Dan, by 2 but this is dropping.
TTom
|
44.871 | | DECWET::METZGER | It is happening again... | Thu Nov 29 1990 14:17 | 15 |
|
What the heck was with the raiders defensive line last week? I was listening
to the game on the radio and on the final drive Either Howie or another Raider
went offsides on every first down of the drive giving the Chiefs 1st and 5
on every series of downs....
The announcers were having a blast with it....
1st and 10 on the 40....Deberg steps up...and HOWIE jumps offside for the
5th time this game!!!!
Was somebody snapping him on the butt with a rubber band or what?
Metz
|
44.872 | GO BRONCOS!!!! | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Thu Nov 29 1990 14:47 | 10 |
|
Faiders will have there hands full come sunday.
close game But look for the Broncos to put the Mr.maggo tag
on Bro.AL head..
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.873 | Re. .871 | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | | Thu Nov 29 1990 15:00 | 10 |
| Howie was being drawn off sides by DeBergs snap count, where DeBerg
goes something like : "hut hut HUT! hut" and gives a nod of his
head on the audible with the emphasis. DeBerg is a master of drawing
defenders off sides with this tactic. Howie, on the other hand has
always had a very quick start off the snap, so he was one of the
ones that was continually being drawn off, along with Golic.
His Kinglyness,
Carlos
|
44.874 | I'm not accusing them of being rocket scientists.... | DECWET::METZGER | It is happening again... | Thu Nov 29 1990 16:24 | 15 |
|
Weel then Howie must have the brain the size of a pea to not figure it out by
the 2nd or 3rd time but 5 or 6 offsides????
C'mon....Are futbal pleyures tat stoopid ?
Metz
btw- I was watching some college game this weekend and the best they could do
for student athlete of the game was some senior with a 2.2 in business....I
guess college big time student athletes are really a thing of the past...
At least they should be able to dig up some guy with a 3.0 or better....
|
44.875 | Still a Raider at heart... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Official King of the Hill '90 | Fri Nov 30 1990 09:05 | 8 |
| It seems that after the S.F.- Tampa game Nov. 18th ex-Raider linebacker
Matt Millen, was approached by an unidentified Tampa OL rookie, "Mr
Millen, Mr Millen," the rookie said "it was great to play against you
today. I can tell my kids someday that I blocked you."
"You didn't block me, kid," growled Millen.
His kinglyness,
Carlos
|
44.876 | So you say | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Fri Nov 30 1990 11:17 | 11 |
| Hey Carlos, You talk about bandwagon donk fans, but what about you?
I don't recall seeing you in this file last year when the faiders
sucked;^
I was in here last year after finding this file, and I'm here now
during the Broncos worst season in ? years....
Donks by 4..
Tim
|
44.877 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Official King of the Hill '90 | Fri Nov 30 1990 13:38 | 16 |
| Tim, I ain't no BW jumper either. Been a Raider fan since I became
interested in football back when I was 12 yrs old, which was 1976,
they coincidentally won the SuperBowl that year, which had nothing
to do with me. I started at DEC about three years ago, and didn't
find out about Notes 'til last year sometime, I was pretty much
read only in the archived NFL Notes file and started replying in
the American_football file around the time that it started up. Did'nt
find out about the Sports file 'til around the end of last season
(see .26). By the way, the Raiders were 8-8 last year, and IMHO
that does not suck, however, 3-8 does. Another interesting thing
that you might be happy to know about, is that, during the '80's
the Donks won a grand total of four more games than the Raiders,
and perhaps even more importantly, the Raiders were 2-0 in SuperBowl
performances compared to the powerful Donks 0-3 (?) performances.
Carlos
|
44.878 | | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Fri Nov 30 1990 17:56 | 6 |
| Ok!!! Put me in my place;^^^
Are you sure on that win stat? Seems the faiders last 5 years were
either 8-8 or worse.
Tj
|
44.879 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Nov 30 1990 21:21 | 8 |
| Don't break the guys bubble. Raider fans can always tell you
how great their team is. It just that the rest of the NFL
just never has and may never really appreciate the greatness
that they would have you believe. Denver may be bad this season
but don't think the Raiders are anything more than a cut above
mediocre. Maybe.
BoB
|
44.880 | Furth...hiccup...further support..... | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Sat Dec 01 1990 08:49 | 34 |
| >Seems the faiders last 5 years were either 8-8 or worse.
Close Tim, your statement would be true if you woulda said the last
4 years, and the two sub .500 yrs within that span, interestingly
enough, were directly attributable to a product from Denver, namely,
Shanahan. Here's a break down of Raiders -vs- Donks in the '80's:
Raiders Broncos
------- -------
Yr. Record Record
-------------------------------------
'89 8-8 11-5
'88 7-9 8-8
'87 5-10 10-4-1
'86 8-8 11-5
'85 12-4 11-5
'84 11-5 13-3
'83 12-4 9-7
'82 8-1 2-7
'81 7-9 10-6
'80 11-5 8-8
---------------------------------
Ttl. 89-63 93-58-1
The only team in the AFC that was better than these two was, Miami,
there record for the '80's is 94-57-1. The best in the league was
S.F., and there record was an amazing 105-46-1.
His Kinglyness,
Carlos
P.S. Often statistics are used as a drunken man uses lampposts
- for support rather than illumination.
|
44.881 | No doubt about it, the Donks are the best 3-9 team around | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Mon Dec 03 1990 09:09 | 20 |
| Hats off to you Donk fans, that was another typical, down to the
last play, type of game between these two teams. Raiders held on
to win it 23-20. With this win the Raiders sweep the Donks,...and
have won the last 5 out of 6,.....and lead the series 41-18-2 !
No wonder you Donk fans hate the Raiders. Bo Jackson was great,
breaking loose for 2 TD's, an 11, and a 62 yarder, rushing 13 times
for 117 yds. Schroeder silenced his critics, completing 16 out of
23 for 145 yds., although I think he could have had an even better
day against a poor passing defense. The Raiders needed this win to
keep pace with the Chiefs atop the West at 8-4. For the remainder
of the season, and because of this win, I think the Raiders now
have the upper hand on the Chiefs, especially if the Donks play
spoiler next week.
Go Raiders!!!!
Go Donks!!!! (ouch....that hurt)
His Royal-ty-ness,
Carlos
|
44.882 | THERE GOES THE SEASON!!! | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Thu Dec 06 1990 14:55 | 15 |
|
I must say it was a good a game too bad the Broncos didn't win. I
think where they lost the game was the interception by Elway that
hurt. But they still showed that do have the talent to win it's
just that they can't seem to get any pressure on the QB. I think
that's whats so frustrating about there games along with the hand
slapping so called tackles. The Draft Looks good to me.
GO BRONCOS.......GET DEFENSIVE LINEMEN/LINEBACKERS IN THE DRAFT...
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.883 | Un-biased forecast! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Fri Dec 07 1990 12:11 | 12 |
| How I see the remainder of the season:
Raiders @Detroit (Mon) Raiders are gonna win by more
than 10. Raiders-27 Lions-16.
Cinci @Raiders Raiders by 7. 21-14.
Raiders @Minn. (Sat) Brrrr... Flip a coin..
SD @Raiders Raiders by 4. 20-16.
Carlos
|
44.884 | Could Be Trouble!!!!! | DECXPS::KHARRIS | | Fri Dec 07 1990 12:19 | 9 |
| The Raiders could have problems with Detroit if the Lions use Sanders
the way that Houston used Lorenzo White against Buffalo. Over the last
couple of years the Raiders have been very vulnerable to the draw play
out of a passing formation. I can't see them faring any better against
Sanders if they don't prepare for him.
Kenn
|
44.885 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Greenpiece,WhatALeprechaunGets | Fri Dec 07 1990 13:10 | 1 |
| Sanders will score at least 2 tds.
|
44.886 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Fri Dec 07 1990 13:39 | 6 |
| Well if he does score at least 2 tds, I believe that will be twice
as many tds as the Raiders have allowed all season against the rush.
( I'm assuming you meant he would score them rushing instead of
receiving.)
Carlos
|
44.887 | | CSC32::SALZER | | Fri Dec 07 1990 13:42 | 17 |
| I went to the game sunday. It was great watching the hitting and
shoving and fighting. The Raiders were soundly boo'd on entrance
or exit. Many cops were standing down by their ramp area along with
a collection of Raider fans. I agree with Drewski. Elway's interception
which was the only trunover by both teams was the key. Carlos said
Shroeder looked good. I would have looked good too standing in the
backfield all day patiently waiting. Half of Shroeders pass yards
came on a 1/2 doz little out patterns to Gault. Henderson got
burned on those all day. But to Jay's credit he read Henderson's
inability to effectively cover and took advantage time and time again.
Denver lead in all stats except for the 1 turnover and of course the
one that counts, final score. This was just another of the many this
season that just seeemed to slip away. It's kind of a twisted
world at times but I have this feeling Raider fans are pulling
for Denver this weekend.
BoB
|
44.888 | TOUGH GAMES.... | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Dec 07 1990 14:48 | 10 |
|
re-1
I think all of the Faider fans are pulling for Denver this week and
I think they could get there wish but I also think them Lions will
eat them up on monday night.
" THE DREWSKI "
|
44.889 | go donks | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Fri Dec 07 1990 15:06 | 4 |
| I don't know that Denver will fair well in KC. They always have
problems.
Tim
|
44.890 | GO BRONCOS | CSC32::LATOUR | DO WHAT YOU SAY | Fri Dec 07 1990 16:42 | 12 |
|
re-1
Good point Tim, They do seem to have problems in KC so maybe I'm wrong
and KC will win, Boy won't that be a shocker and that poor old guy
will be stuck up there in Denver on the Board.
"THE DREWSKI "
|
44.891 | RAIDERS FAITHFULS ARE ALIVE!!!\ | WLDWST::LSUSTAITA | | Sun Dec 09 1990 02:39 | 19 |
| WE'LL the RAIDERS have a good chance to go 3-1 in their last four
games minnesota has been winning and as for the bengals the
RAIDERS have had their # for a while i hope the RAIDERS can pull it
off this season its been an up and down battle against them selves
basicly JAY SCHRAEDER THE RAIDERS will be in the playoffs...
always keeping are hopes up
SILVER&BLACK ATTACK ARE BACK!!!!!!!
LA RAIDERS 28
DETRIOT 10
JUST WIN BABY!!!!
|
44.892 | Will LA win by more than 3, im not convinvced | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Mon Dec 10 1990 07:43 | 9 |
| Well No help from Denver yesturday, they beat denver and even covered
the 8pt spread....Its up to LA now, they should have no problems
beating Detroit (should have no problem) but will they be able to
cover the 3pt spread. After last weeks 3pt win over denver they scare
me on these close games. Im hoping for a LA blowout....Have to wait
and see.....Wildcard rece is getting scary LA needs this win to give
them a lock on the playoffs and keep them in position for the Division.
Mike
|
44.893 | Lions might pose problem if QB is protected. | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Mon Dec 10 1990 17:03 | 13 |
| re-1 As well you should not be convinced. LA is in the 2nd half
season slide that I predicted, and I see it continuing (sp?). I think
the raiders will win 1-2 games. The should definitely lose to Minni,
and I think cinci stands a real good chance of beating them with the no
huddle offense.
LA always seems to sub alot of people on defense, and I think cincy
will take advantage of it (I hope).
No I'm not jumpin' any wagons, I just like to se the Faiders lose.
Tim
|
44.894 | No huddle being employed less and less ... | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Dec 11 1990 08:23 | 9 |
| > LA always seems to sub alot of people on defense, and I think cincy
> will take advantage of it (I hope).
Was listening to a Cris Collinsworth (he does a sports talk show on a
Cincinnati radio station) last night and he said Boomer had a groin
pull from Sunday's game and could barely move on Monday. He is not
expected to be 100% ready to go against the Raiders. Moreover, the
Bengals have really tried to become a running team since about week 5
of the season, and are averaging around 25-28 passes per game since then.
|
44.895 | | COMET::DUNKERS | | Tue Dec 11 1990 08:37 | 9 |
| With the faiders coming to the Metrodome, they will definitely lose
to Minnesota. Schroeder will be eating heavy amounts of turf when
the Purple People Eaters get ahold of him.
Easy win for the Vikes!
Minn-28
L.A.-09
Purple Blooded
|
44.896 | LA Beats Detroit bring on Cinncy.... | KIDVAX::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 11 1990 08:52 | 12 |
| Im praying big that LA can romp over Cinncy next week, they did a good
job against Detroit last night, even after detroit rolled up the pts in
the 1st qtr. If LA can beat cinncy this week it not only puts them in
the playoffs but that combines with the buffalo loss on saturday to the
giants will put them 1 game behind buffalo for home field....If buffalo
loses this week then has to play miami the following week they could
lose the remainder of the season.... If the raiders and buffalo both
finished with the same record who gets home field (have they played
head to head this year) This also putts Houston and Pittsburg in
control in the central, houston will have a tough game against KC but
pitt should be able to take NO.....Great weekend for playoff effects..
|
44.897 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Dec 11 1990 08:57 | 8 |
| re .896:
Buffalo beat the Raiders earlier this year, so they'd get the edge in a
tie-breaker. Note however that the Bills last three games are against
the Giants, Dolphins, and Redskins.
py
|
44.898 | Carlos is quiet???? | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Tue Dec 11 1990 11:47 | 11 |
| I think your forgetting KC. Remember that KC beat the Faiders 2x
this year, so thus if a tie breaker is needed, then LA loses. I tried
to watch last nights game, but was "preoccupied". I did see the Lions
get 2-3 Td's early, then LA getting 2, but missed everything after
that, with the exception of that 10 minute review of the
fumble,run,penalty, and????...
Who is Boomers back up? I don't recall ever seeing anyone play QB
for Cinncy, except for Boom.
Tim
|
44.899 | last I remeber it was Turk Shornert (sp) | MPP6::CHILDS | Got 2 shots, anywhere & anytime | Tue Dec 11 1990 11:52 | 0 |
44.900 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Tue Dec 11 1990 12:01 | 14 |
| >Carlos is quiet???
I was saving myself for marri...ehh...I mean .900.
Great game last night, unbelievable first quarter.
Barry Sanders is for real!
Raiders are gonna win the West, count on it!
I believe Norman's (a.k.a. Boomer's) backup is Southpaw Erik Wilhelm.
His noble-ty-ness,
Carlos
|
44.901 | | DECWET::METZGER | It is happening again... | Tue Dec 11 1990 12:58 | 22 |
|
Yup Erik Wilhelm...a total Boomer clone right down to being a southpaw and blond.
Of course he doesn't rake in the advertisement $$$$ that Boomer does....
Those of you extolling the fact that the lions have a decent defense....
They are currently ranked last in the league....
The R&S put up enough points last night, The Lion defense let them down....Of
course the officials bogus call on the fumble that was kept in bounds had a
little something to do with it.
They spend 8 minutes replaying where to spot a fumble recovery (a few yards
either way) and then they don't bother to look at the conclusive replay on
a fumble recovery....
Ugh,
Metz
|
44.902 | Lion out of bounds on the fumble was too close to call | KIDVAX::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 12 1990 07:57 | 17 |
| Didnt the Ref on the field call the man out of bounds, the reply I
saw, which I believe was the closes view to where the call actually
came from it looked like the player was touching (His hand towel was
clearly on the ground) So the reg saw a part of his body touching the
ground, remember the ref is watching this at full speed....The reply
has to have conclusive evidence to overturn a call and he did not...No
view showed without a doubt that he was not out of bounds.....I think
the only thing that was touching out of bounds was his hand towel ????
maybe theyll stop wearing them on the side....OH well good game anyway,
even if detroit got that call I think the raiders would have won....
There a much better team then detroit and if it wasnt for the explosive
1st qtr that detroit had the game would have been a cake walk for the
raiders....The best team won, hopefully KC will drop one next week and
LA will win and keep this race interesting...LA loses in a tie and its
getting down to the wire.
Mike
|
44.903 | | REFINE::ASHE | Waiting... 4 u 2 justify my video... | Wed Dec 12 1990 09:45 | 5 |
| No way. ABC even said had the booth seen the same view they had they
would have reversed it, but didn't because of the 8 minute fiasco
before that on 4th down. The towel touches after he makes contact with
the ball. It was a blown call, showing the inconsistancy of the
instant replay booth...z
|
44.904 | Good Game Good Call, Best call ref could have made | KIDVAX::MBROOKS | | Wed Dec 12 1990 10:30 | 18 |
| Yes when he first made contact with the fumble his towel was not
touching the ground, I have the game on tape and stoped and slow
mode the play several times and before the ball left his hand his
towel was most definatley touching the ground, I dont beleive that
this is part of his body and counts as being out of bounds, maybe
it does Im not sure. But the towel was most definatly touching the
gound before the ball left his hand, this is what the ref saw and
called.....I guess my question now is does the towel count as part
of him if so he was out of bounds, if the towel does not count then
the ball left his hands .0000001 seconds before he touched ground.
It was a good call from the angle it came from and I doubt very much
it could have been overturned......(maybe by a anti Raider or a blind
detroit fan, or even a KC fan but no one else)......Ill proberbly go
home now and watch it a few more times to make sure, if you have it
taped you may want to slow-mo throw that play and see when the towel
hits the ground and when the ball LEAVES his hand !!!
Mike
|
44.905 | | SASE::SZABO | The Beer Hunter | Wed Dec 12 1990 10:48 | 8 |
| I thought the "argument" on that call was concerning the direction the
ball went after it was slapped away from the sideline, no? Didn't the
3 Stooges in the booth say that the ball would've had to be slapped in
the backward direction, not forward?
Of course, this was after several ales anyway..... :-)
Hawk
|
44.906 | | REFINE::ASHE | Waiting... 4 u 2 justify my video... | Wed Dec 12 1990 11:51 | 3 |
| Right, but it *was* slapped backwards. (not the 4th down play Hawk,
this was a Raider fumble)... towards the end zone the Lions were
defending...
|
44.907 | Told ya it was the ales! | SASE::SZABO | The Beer Hunter | Wed Dec 12 1990 12:42 | 6 |
| In the immortal words of Emily Latella:
"Oh. Nevermind!"
Hawk
|
44.908 | | REFINE::ASHE | Waiting... 4 u 2 justify my video... | Wed Dec 12 1990 12:55 | 9 |
| The official NFL stance was that the play was whistled dead and
shouldn't have been reviewed. According to the NFL replay official
in Detroit, "I had 3 views on TV, it was inconclusive... after the play
went on, TV came back with another shot (where was he?) If I had had
that shot I would have overruled that play on the field..."
Take it up with the official Mike...
-Walt
|
44.909 | Why instant replay is a farce | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | $80,000 + a Chevy Blazer | Wed Dec 12 1990 12:55 | 22 |
| I've seen this out of bounds play 3 times in the past 5 weekends or so.
FIrst was the Jets-Dolphins game, Dolphins fumbled, Jets recover, but
the refs say it went out of bounds. TV replay clearly shows it never
went out, and after about 5 minutes, the refs are ready to give the
ball to the Jets. They see Shula fuming on the sideline, take two more
minutes then re-reverse the call claiming the old inadvertant whistle.
About a week later, the Giants recovered such a fumble, but the replay
seemed to show that the recovering Giant, Pepper Johnson I think, was
half laying out of bounds as he reeled it in. Not much discussion and
the ball was given to the Giants.
Then this past Monday, the ball should have been ruled a fumble, but
the Raiders hang on to the ball despite a conclusive replay.
3 times this play occured, never once called right, but the Dolphins.
Giants and Raiders all benefit.
It's who you know.
Dan
|
44.910 | | DECWET::METZGER | It is happening again... | Wed Dec 12 1990 13:20 | 24 |
|
Not to mention that the inadvertant whistle is a big cop out. The technology
exists today to have a visual mark appear on the video tape the exact moment
a whistle is blown on the field. Why won't the NFL use it. They say cost...
The entire system would cost 500k...BFD to a league that is raking in money hand
over fist. I say it is because they are too wimpy to institute the instant
replay the way it should be.
1) NO ex-nfl official in the replay booth. Use somebody specifically trained for
this job who doesn't worry about making his buddies on the field look bad.
2) Use the visual whistle on the tape...
3) Give each coach 3 appeals per game. Let the coaches decide when they want to
use the replay. If they want more than 3 make them forfeit timeouts for them.
IE. make it an appeal play, If the coach wins he keeps his 3 appeal, if he
loses then he is down to 2 appeals left.
My $.02,
Metz
|
44.911 | | MPP6::MACNEAL | Life's 2 short 2 drink cheap beer | Wed Dec 12 1990 13:38 | 4 |
| �Not to mention that the inadvertant whistle is a big cop out.
I don't think so. Everyone on the field stops when a whistle is blown.
Who can say what would have happened if the whistle didn't blow.
|
44.912 | JMHO | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Wed Dec 12 1990 13:50 | 5 |
| I think every team has both benefited and been hurt by the instant
replay, so in the grand scheme of things, it all balances out.
His king-ly-ness
Carlos
|
44.913 | And it aggravates the hell out of the fans, too... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 12 1990 14:05 | 35 |
|
> Not to mention that the inadvertant whistle is a big cop out. The technology
> exists today to have a visual mark appear on the video tape the exact moment
> a whistle is blown on the field. Why won't the NFL use it. They say cost...
The problem is that the play is *really* dead when in the official's
mind he says it is. The whistle may come later. Linking the whistle
to the video is more electronic gimmickry which would take even more
on-field judgement from the official and cause even more problems, in
my opinion. For instance, what if the whistle drops from the
officials' mouth on a play when forward progress is stopped, he delays
getting it back in and there's a subsequent fumble? The whistle is
nothing more than the physical realization of what is going on in the
official's head, and should not be an irrefutable, locked-in substitute
for that...
In any case, most of these whistles are not "inadvertent" anyway.
They're a direct response to what the official thought he saw, even if
delayed. The video marker wouldn't fix the problem of the blown fumble
call. I say scrap the replay and rely on the official's judgement or
pass a rule that says that whenever the ball is loose the play is live,
whether the whistle has blown or not. The whistle would stop any
advancement of the loose ball once recovered, but at least it would not
affect the more important question of possession. Does this make sense
or is the whistle really so sacred that it can't be pre-empted
temporarily? I don't think I've ever seen a fumble play where the
whistle stopped anyone from crashing into that pig-pile, to tell you
the truth...
I still don't understand why they even bother to review fumble calls
after the play has been ruled dead on the field. It accomplishes
nothing but letting us know whether the original call was blown or not.
glenn
|
44.914 | Merry Xmas....No bashing here..... | DECWET::METZGER | It is happening again... | Wed Dec 12 1990 15:26 | 35 |
|
Let take an example where they showed the whistle marking on the video tape...
A couple of years ago (might have even been last year) Denver playing the
Browns. John-boy throws a pass to his back behind the line of scrimmage,
The back drops the ball and the cleveland defender falls on the ball and
then picks it up and goes into the end zone.
The refs say incomplete pass, then they review it and decide it actually was
a lateral. Then they say Denver still gets the ball because the whistle had
blown the ball dead when it hit the ground.
Then CBS shows the video tape with the visual whistle signal on it (the
first time I saw it was this year) They show that the whistle wasn't actually
blown until the cleveland player had picked up the ball and was getting up to
start his stroll into the end zone.
The official might have thought the play was over in his head but he didn't
communicate it to the players on the field. The ball was technically still live
when the cleveland player picked it up. It should have been cleveland ball
where it was recovered.
A lot of times the officials use the excuse (the play was blown dead) even
though you can listen to the replay and hear the whistle well after the point
where the official says the play was dead. IMO the play isn't over until the
official communicates it to the players (whistle is blown).
In soccer you're always taught to play the whistle, If the ball goes out of
bounds don't pick it up, keep playing until the official signals the play is
over or you can get penalized.
I think that the whistle should be the signal that the play is dead not some
abstract idea in an officials mind.
Metz
|
44.915 | Go Broncos | COMET::JACKSONTA | IMtheSAMEasYOUiJUSTdoTHEbestIcan | Wed Dec 12 1990 15:58 | 8 |
| Jeeze, I thought that the Donks file was bad for this BS. I beleive
one of the 3 ABC boys said that they wouldn't be suprised to see the
replay go away next year and I wouldn't either.
I agree that it needs "bettered" and that it also has benefitted all
teams.
Tim
|
44.916 | What's the rule now (John H?)? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Dec 12 1990 18:01 | 28 |
|
> I think that the whistle should be the signal that the play is dead
> not some abstract idea in an officials mind.
I hear you, Metz, but I don't think you can make a rule based on
something as arbitrary as how long it takes the official to blow the
whistle. Instead of a black-and-white call of the player being down
or not, you've now got fans looking on holding their breath hoping
that the ref took his time blowing the damn thing in making his call.
Get an identical play in the same game that goes the other way because
an official whistled quickly, and you've got more complaints than you
had before...
I believe the inevitable result of such a rule would be that the
officials wouldn't blow the whistle even on obvious downs, then
would try to backtrack with the use of instant replay. That
indecisiveness is an insidious side-effect that instant replay has
already produced.
I'm not even sure of the current rule so maybe John H. can help. Under
the rules, can a replay official even overturn a down call on the field
if he doesn't hear the whistle on the tape or something? I've never
seen it done, and yet everyone, especially sportscasters, always
assumes that the officials are copping out. Are they given any choice
at all in the matter?
glenn
|
44.917 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Dec 13 1990 07:26 | 13 |
| The technology exists to mark a spot on the replay tape when the
whistle was blown, but the NFL Officials have fought it.
To my knowledge, the Replay Official is a former on-field official in
either the college or NFL ranks. A Replay Offical works with the same
officiating crew all year and attends all the night before and pre
game meetings with the on-field crew.
Finally, a replay official is not allowed to overturn a call if an
on-field official claims the whistle had blown the play dead. I don't
think it will be a reversible call until the proper technology is used.
John
|
44.918 | exit | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 13 1990 09:06 | 13 |
| Why not use robots to play the game and then there wont be injuries.
The Instant reply can go but inadvertant wistles will have to stay.
If I heard the wistle blow and then saw the ball bouncing on the gound
or some guy running it in for a TD I wouldnt chase him if I heard the
wistle blow the call dead.........Theres good and bad points to
every argument to and for Reply but bad news guys were not going to
decide. And lastly you can never take the opionins of the guys up in
the booth there more Bias then the coaches....
Im sure if you review the whole game you could find a call that went
in Detroit favor and the 2 would equal out. Every so often I do watch
a game that seems to be one sided but not that often....
Mike
|
44.919 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Dec 13 1990 09:14 | 12 |
|
> Finally, a replay official is not allowed to overturn a call if an
> on-field official claims the whistle had blown the play dead. I don't
> think it will be a reversible call until the proper technology is used.
So then strictly by the rules the possibility *does* exist that an
official can make a down call on the field, hold the whistle, and
have it overturned by instant replay? If so, seems like a hole in
the rules, but...
glenn
|
44.920 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Greenpiece,WhatALeprechaunGets | Thu Dec 13 1990 10:22 | 2 |
| re .918, better yet have the robots automatically stop when the whistle
is blown.
|
44.921 | Raiders/Houston/Pittsburg All Win (Would love it) | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Thu Dec 13 1990 10:39 | 11 |
| Maybe we can just use Post Hypnotic Suggestions in all players to stop
when they here the Whistle.....
Can anyone direct me out of the Instant Reply/Officails note and to
the raiders notes file....
Raiders 21 Cinny 20 Houston 27 KC 24 in OT...
This would make a perfect Weekend Pittsburg is the only AFC Central
with a less then good team Pittsburg 24 New Orleans 10
Mike
|
44.922 | Dear Raiders, please help. | SHALOT::MEDVID | November spawned a monster | Thu Dec 13 1990 11:31 | 6 |
| Pittsburgh has been suspect at defensing the run lately and they have
yet to face a back the size of Heyward. Walsh is getting better every
game. I think it will be close, but I also would not be surprised if
the AFC central is still a dead heat after this weekend also.
--dan'l
|
44.923 | | SONG::ASHE | Waiting... 4 u 2 justify my video... | Thu Dec 13 1990 15:42 | 9 |
| Maybe you can, but think of what happens if Detroit gets the call.
They have the ball with another minute or so on the clock.
They have a timeout.
They have it 30 yards farther down field.
They have down by 4 instead of 7.
If you can think of a call they got with that much of an impact,
let me know...
|
44.924 | What if...What if.. | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Fri Dec 14 1990 07:52 | 19 |
| If were going to do what if'sss then on the first play when detroit
gets the ball they throw an interception and raiders run it back for
a td and now there up by 11......
Any Bad call can have a major impact, It can put you from a run play
to a force pass play, stop you from getting a 1st down, anytime you
stop a team from making the 1st down youve taking away there chance to
score. I didnt watch the entire game, I taped it and fast forward thru
alot but Im sure there was at least one questionable call either for
detroit or against LA that gave det a 1st down or took one away from
LA. Anything can happen, look at minnasota there still in the playoff
hunt after being 1-6 or something like that...
Even if you look at this one situation, Detroit is still forced to
score a TD being down by 4....and if they did LA would only need a
Field Goal to tie it...
Bottom line the best team won....
Mike
|
44.925 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Fri Dec 14 1990 11:38 | 14 |
| re. 921
>Pittsburgh is the only AFC central with a less then good team
Hey Mike, are you forgetting about the Browns? I gotta say that
I like your win/lose predictions (except for the Saint/Steeler game),
but don't agree on the scores (except the Oiler/Chief game). I think
it'll be more like:
Raiders - 27 Oilers/Chiefs, Saints - 24
Bengals - 14 same as yours Steelers - 17
Carlos
|
44.926 | RAIDERS SILVER&BLACK ATTACK! | GSMOKE::LSUSTAITA | | Mon Dec 17 1990 01:13 | 8 |
| the RAIDERS are back they beat the CINCINATI KITTENS,
and they beat them pretty easy.RAIDERS CLINCH A PLAYOFF BIRTH
since 1985.
LOS ANGELES RAIDERS 24
CINNCINATI BENGALS 7 F
SILVER&BLACK ARE BACK!!!!!!!
THE ULTIMATE RAIDERS FAN!!!
|
44.927 | Cinncy's Defense Knows Diddly about BO !!! | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Mon Dec 17 1990 07:56 | 7 |
| Raiders still have to win next 2 weeks to guarentee the division and
a buy in the 1st round of the playoffs....They cant tie KC, kc plays
SD and the bears, Raiders have Minn next week (hope they crush them
this would knock Minn out of the playoffs and give dallas a better
pick this draft.).....BO knows cinncys Defense, BO owns Cinncy's Def.
Mike
|
44.928 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Mon Dec 17 1990 09:08 | 10 |
| >Raiders still have to win next 2 weeks to guarantee the division
>and a bye in the 1st round of the playoffs...
or, the Raiders win one and the Chiefs lose one. The main thing
is that the Raiders are in the playoffs!!!! As somebody else pointed
out, they have'nt been to the playoffs since '85, which was also
the last time that they one the Super Bowl.(?)
His noble-ty-ness,
Carlos
|
44.929 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Greenpiece,WhatALeprechaunGets | Mon Dec 17 1990 09:49 | 9 |
| No Carlos, You sovern-knowingless,
The Bears won in '85, The Patsies beat the pa-Raiders in the divisional
playoffs.
The Raiders won in 83.
u was schlepped
|
44.930 | Bo's gonna know the SuperBowl! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Mon Dec 17 1990 10:52 | 36 |
| re -1 oops! oh well, good thing I put in the little (?) dis-claimer.
I do however, know for sure that the last two times an AFC
team won the SB it was the Raiders. :-)
Here is my personal playoff predictions:
AFC East
Miami 13-3
Buffalo 12-4 (wild card)
Central
Houston 10-6 Pitts. will also be 9-7, but
will not make the playoffs
due to tie-breaker decision
going to KC and Seattle.
West
Raiders 12-4
Seattle 9-7 (wild card)
KC 9-7 (wild card)
NFC East
Giants 13-3
Wash. 11-5 (wild card)
Phil. 10-6 (wild card)
Dallas 8-8 (wild card)
Central
Chicago 12-4
West
San Fran 13-3
His Kinglyness,
Carlos
|
44.931 | Where Are You Now???? | CBROWN::KHARRIS | | Mon Dec 17 1990 10:57 | 9 |
| One thing that I don't hear any more is all of the people ripping
Bo anymore. Everyone said it wouldn't work with Marcus and Bo splitting
time in the Backfield and they're wrong. Bo can break it loose at
anytime during the game. He's rushed for over 100 yds. the last three
games and he's looked spectacular doing it. Marcus is very unselfish as
well as being a top running back.
Kenn
|
44.932 | Just Win Baby!!!!! | ROYALT::FORGET | Raiders Fan | Mon Dec 17 1990 14:15 | 13 |
|
Kenn
I agree with you 100%. The splitting of Bo & Marcus
is great. It helps out each other. Their a double threat.
When Bo's resting, Marcus the multi talented back and Bo the
power runner. Bo looked awesome. The defense played another
good game. The Raiders should win the Division. UP Next the
Purple People Eaters (The Vikings), who lost to Tampa Bay.
Mike
|
44.933 | KC will take division | COMET::JACKSONTA | You forgot the Violin again!! | Mon Dec 17 1990 16:25 | 5 |
| From what I have seen of Bo, he gets 75%-80% of his yards on 1 run.
He had a 90 yarder yesterday, which I thought was very impressive, but
other than that run(s), what else did he do? He does break them open.
Tim
|
44.934 | Raiders will win big this week and may clinch it | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 08:27 | 12 |
| A 70-80 yrd run will put points on the board 99% of the time........
Id love to see him have one run like this each game, even if he only
avergaes 2-3 yrds on the rest of his carries it opens up the recievers
when the defense is bo struck... I still like marcus allen and wish
he didnt have to split his time with another top RB, Marcus should be
getting 1000yrds each year with his talant and if he played on any
other team he would..Of course by splitting the time it also lesson the
chances of injury so who knows....The Raiders should beat Minnasota big
this weekend, which could clinch the division for LA and will knock
Minn out of the playoff picture completly.
Hows this for a Dream Superbowl La raiders VS Dallas Cowboys..
|
44.935 | HA HA | COMET::DUNKERS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 08:32 | 7 |
| Re.-1
Faiders will not win over Minnesota big......not even in their wildest
dreams. They will be lucky to ecape the Metrodome with a 10 point loss.
Not a chance......
Purple Blooded
|
44.936 | | BSS::JCOTANCH | CU: Back-to-Back Big 8 Champs | Tue Dec 18 1990 08:45 | 12 |
| > The Raiders should beat Minnasota big
> this weekend, which could clinch the division for LA and will knock
> Minn out of the playoff picture completly.
The only way a Faider win would clinch the division would be if the
Chiefs choke again this weekend. The Faiders will come back to earth
this week anyway, as the Vikes will win easily.
Minnesota 34
Russians 10
Joe
|
44.937 | Raiders need it more.... | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 08:17 | 4 |
| The raiders cant afford a loss and the Vikings have a small pipe dream
chance of making the playoffs....Besides the vikings have to lose there
last 2 so Dallas will have better draft picks :-)...
|
44.938 | Raiders = AFC West Champions! | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Tue Dec 18 1990 09:53 | 20 |
| >.....,as the Vikes will win easily.
Yeah right, like they easily won the powerful Buccaneers. Haaaaha.
Should be a good game though. Both teams have big physical type
players on defense, but the Raiders IMHO, are better against the
run than the Vikes, which should be the Raiders avenue on offense.
Look for Bo to run over Joey Browner at least once. Herschel will
be kept in check, even if Burns decides to utilize him a little more
than his usual 8 or so carries/per game. :-) Tim Brown has awakened
on offense which should help free up Gault and Fernandez for some
big gains. That is if Schroeder doesn't Sybil out on us again. :-)
Raiders - 24
Vikes - 17
His kinglyness,
Carlos
|
44.939 | Bo who? | COMET::DUNKERS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 10:23 | 11 |
| RE-1
I hope the Faiders are as cocky and over-confident as you because the
Vikes lost to the Buc's, because come Saturday the men in purple are
gonna wipe the turf up with Schroeder, Bo(tsk), and the rest of those
clowns. In order for Bo-Bo to get near Browner, he's gotta get past
the front four...and that won't happen. It'll be an entertaining game
alright..but if your really lookin' for a win...well, enough said.
Vikes..in a laugher!
|
44.940 | Herschal VS BO Could be close by add allen and look out | VLNVAX::MBROOKS | | Tue Dec 18 1990 12:13 | 5 |
| I think LA will mix it up a little more this week. BO will break lose
outside and they may even use alot more dump passes towards the
outside. BO and Marcus will catch a few more this week than usall and
Minn wont know how to handle it...This game will be over at halftime..
|
44.941 | | ELMAGO::CGRIEGO | Trust Jesus | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:35 | 7 |
| Greg Townsend DE will finally make it to the Pro-Bowl in Feb.
Townsend will be the only starter from the Raiders, but will be
joined by three other teammates, that will be alternates, including:
Bo Jackson RB, Steve Wisniewski G, and Don Mosebar C.
His nobilityness,
Carlos
|
44.942 | | SACT41::ROSS | o.o | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:39 | 2 |
| Bo Jackson - MLB All Star and NFL Pro Bowler. The greatest athlete of
the 20th century.
|
44.943 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Order your Don King Chia Pet now | Thu Dec 20 1990 14:08 | 7 |
|
> MLB All Star and NFL Pro Bowler.
I didn't know he was a professional bowler, too.
Dickstah
|
44.944 | 1 Down, 1 To Go!!! | DASXPS::KHARRIS | | Thu Dec 27 1990 10:24 | 13 |
| Raiders beat the Vikings 28-24, with Schroeder having a big day. Big
game this week against SD. John Friesz will replace Toliver at QB for
SD. Bo is expected to sit out this game to rest a slightly sprained
ankle. Win the game and win the division!!!! Aaron Wallace was all over
the place against the Vikes. I don't understand his lack of playing
time. The man is an awesome pass rusher. I like the Raiders this week
Raiders 31
Chargers 13
Kenn
|
44.945 | SOS please help out for rotiserrie league help | MPP6::CHILDS | I could use a dramatic sting here | Thu Dec 27 1990 11:42 | 4 |
|
Kenn, where did ya read about Toliver riding the pine?
mike
|
44.946 | | SALEM::DODA | Worthy's X-mas list: Ho, Ho, Ho | Thu Dec 27 1990 11:54 | 6 |
| Mike,
FWIW, SD benched BJ during last weeks game because he was stinkin
the joint up....
daryll
|
44.947 | Maybe I'll start Warren anyways...for ins | MPP6::CHILDS | I could use a dramatic sting here | Thu Dec 27 1990 12:33 | 5 |
|
Thanks Daryll I guess I should have know. oh well maybe Friez will stink
and they'll go back to BJ.
mike
|