T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
28.1 | Red Sox conference | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | O's in 1990: Miracle on 33rd St. | Fri Dec 15 1989 09:06 | 4 |
| See also HARBOR::RED_SOX (press KP7 to add to your notebook).
py
|
28.2 | I'm not making this up | SALEM::RIEU | We're Taxachusetts...AGAIN | Fri Dec 15 1989 13:10 | 3 |
| According to today's Globe Billy Buck wants to finish his career
with the Sox.
Denny
|
28.3 | He's already finished his career with the Sox | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | TheFew,TheProud,TheBoatrockers | Fri Dec 15 1989 13:16 | 0 |
28.4 | | SASE::SZABO | Samurai Bartender | Fri Dec 15 1989 13:17 | 6 |
| I heard that on the radio this morning. He must've narrowed the gap
between his legs since he left the Sox! :-)
Actually, he's building a house in Middleton, MA right now....
Hawk
|
28.5 | What are they thinking? | MUSKIE::WIERSBECK | Please let it get above 0 again | Fri Dec 22 1989 08:22 | 4 |
| Angels sign Smithson, parade in... any other city!!! :*)
Spud
|
28.6 | | 39131::DHAMEL | I saw Noriega in K-mart | Fri Dec 22 1989 09:01 | 15 |
|
For the out-of-towners, what the brilliant front office did was
to neglect/forget to offer Smithson a contract by the specified
date. Same thing that sent Fisk on his way.
Granted, Smithson is no all star, but it is another uncompensated
loss due to an unforgivable blunder. It's one thing to lose players
to free agency, and another to see them go because of management
stupidity.
Gawd, this love-hate relationship is gonna be the death of me yet.
-Dick
|
28.7 | | CAM::WAY | We are such stuff as dreams are made on | Fri Dec 22 1989 09:40 | 8 |
| Go Red Sox....
That front office has got to be the dumbest in all of sport. I cain't
believe it.
Gee, Mr Gumby, I forgot....
Chainsaw
|
28.8 | | BTOVT::AJA_M | The Pack is Back | Fri Dec 22 1989 09:46 | 2 |
| Re:-1 No way! The Yankee owner and his front office is the dumbest in
all sports.
|
28.9 | Smithson--so what? | EARRTH::ROURKE | | Wed Dec 27 1989 13:53 | 4 |
| Are you people seriously upset because Mike Smithson is gone??????
Let's get real----this equals addition via subtraction!!!!
|
28.10 | | SHANE::PACIELLO | | Wed Dec 27 1989 14:09 | 4 |
| I'd half to agree there. Smithson did little at most for the BOSOX.
He was another arm on an already less than average staff.
-Mike
|
28.11 | He might do OK there, then again... | MUSKIE::WIERSBECK | All is quiet on New Years Day | Thu Dec 28 1989 08:19 | 6 |
| Oh come on guys, who is going to be your punching bag now, Reardon??
:*)
Spud
|
28.12 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | FFL A rules! | Thu Dec 28 1989 08:25 | 12 |
| re the last few:
If Smithson makes the Angels' 24-man roster, I'll be surprised.
Smithson's one asset while with the Sox was his ability to fill a few
different roles (long relief, middle relief, occasional starter). He
had some pretty good performances, but overall wasn't that great.
Red Sox still need a #4 and #5 starter.
py
|
28.13 | Believe it or not, I did hear it. | KAOFS::MCCANN | | Thu Dec 28 1989 10:34 | 7 |
| I heard a rumour up here in Ottawa about a possible blockbuster
trade between the Montreal Expos and the Red Sox. The trade would have
Tim Raines, Tim Wallach and Andres Gallaraga going to the Sox for
Wade Boggs, Mike Greenwell and Ellis Burkes. Has their been any talk of
this down there?
Dennis
|
28.14 | | HEURIS::METZGER | Is it Ski season yet ? | Thu Dec 28 1989 10:38 | 14 |
|
Never happen...
Aint no way the sox would ever trade Boggs,Greenwell and Burkes at the same time
You might as well just swap names if thye were going to do this.
ALso,
Lou Gorman is too Skeered to try a trade that big. The Sox need pitching.
They don't need to swap outfielders and infielders for more outfielders and
infielders.
metz
|
28.15 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Thu Dec 28 1989 12:32 | 2 |
| That trade has been brought up a few times in the Red Sox notesfile.
The consensus basically agreed with Metz.
|
28.16 | | FXNBS::CASO | | Thu Dec 28 1989 12:35 | 5 |
|
THe latest one
LEE SMITH AND SCOTT COOPER TO THE BRAVES FOR MERCKER-SMITH-GANT...
|
28.18 | | SHANE::PACIELLO | | Thu Dec 28 1989 13:06 | 3 |
| Sox wouldn't be stupid enough to give up both Greenwell and Burkes...
-Mike
|
28.19 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Dec 28 1989 13:12 | 3 |
| Yes, they could.
Lee
|
28.20 | | SHANE::PACIELLO | | Thu Dec 28 1989 15:21 | 4 |
| Oh yeah....I keep forgetting about Ruth and Lyle... :-)
-Mike
|
28.21 | | CAM::WAY | And The Wall came tumblin' down... | Tue Jan 02 1990 12:39 | 11 |
| I hear the Red Sox are going to pick up Joe Walton as assistant
GM...lend a whole new meaning to the term "green monster".
Anyway, I can see the Sox dealing Greenwell, but for some reason I
can't see them trading Burkes... At any rate, those three guys would
never go at the same time....even if Gorman was that stupid, and
personally I think the guy has ~4 brain cells, he knows he'd never
make if from Fenway to his car alive after the deal was announced...
JMHO,
Chainsaw
|
28.22 | Has It Really Been That Long ??? | DWOVAX::HUNT | Carolina Bound | Fri Jan 05 1990 09:37 | 25 |
| *** This date in history ***
On this date exactly 70 years ago on 5-Jan-1920, Boston Red Sox owner
Harry Frazee sold the contract of Boston Red Sox pitcher-outfielder
George Herman "Babe" Ruth to the New York Yankees who were owned by
Colonel Jacob Ruppert.
The sales price of the contract was an astronomical and sensational sum
of $125,000.
Ruth had just completed the 1919 season having hit an astonishing
total of 29 home runs for Boston.
The 1920 baseball season would feature a much livlier baseball and the
outlawing of the spitball and other trick pitches such as the
"shineball" and "scuffball". Ruth would smash over 50 home runs in
1920 and would completely and totally revolutionize the game of
baseball for evermore. Ruth became (and still is) one of America's
all-time favorite sports heroes and the Yankees would go on to rule
major league baseball until the mid-1960s.
Oh, and the Boston Red Sox have, of course, never won a World Series
since that fateful day.
Bob Hunt
|
28.23 | Gee, thanks for reminding us Bob. It slipped by me. 8^) | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Giants | Fri Jan 05 1990 09:44 | 2 |
|
|
28.24 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Jan 05 1990 09:48 | 10 |
| re .23
The Baseball Encyclopedia lists the date of the Ruth-to-NY sale as
January 3, 1920.
In addition to the $125,000 purchase price, the deal also included a
$300,000 loan to Frazee.
py
|
28.25 | always on my mind...... | SASE::SZABO | Butt, Iris! | Fri Jan 05 1990 09:50 | 4 |
| Bob, would you happen to know if the Yankee owner, Jacob Ruppert, had
anything to do with Ruppert-Knickerbocker beer?
Hawk
|
28.26 | Couldn't resist | DWOVAX::HUNT | Carolina Bound | Fri Jan 05 1990 09:50 | 8 |
| My pleasure, /Don, my pleasure.
And to all the Sox fans, it's okay. No need to thank me. I'm sure
you'd have done the same thing for me. I'm sure someone out there will
make sure and remind me that the Phils traded Larry Bowa for Ivan
DeJesus and then threw in Ryne Sandberg as an afterthought.
Bob Hunt
|
28.27 | Boston Fans: Just say NO to "No-No Nanette" | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Big Mac | Fri Jan 05 1990 10:30 | 2 |
| Thanks, Bob. And to think I was just getting over that 1986 film clip
of Bill Buckner I saw on a 1980's sports recap on New Year's Eve.
|
28.29 | | CAM::WAY | I've seen the boys of summer in ruin | Fri Jan 05 1990 11:04 | 28 |
| First:
< Note 28.28 by VAXWRK::NEEDLE "Fascist moderator asshole" >
^^^^^^^
Please change this to Rectal Pore, since I find it offensive ;^)
re Sox:
Ah, a black day indeed. Very often, I've wonder what life would
be like in that parallel universe that quantum theory often dictates,
where Ruth was not traded to finance a musical.
Would it be that the Red Sox were able to be the dominant force in
baseball? Would it be that Ruth had even more homeruns because of
the park effect (tm) in Fenway?
Ah, the wonder of it all...
Perhaps even Bill Buckner would have played for the dreaded Yank-mes
and booted the ball in their first WS in 11 years....
Oh well, to dream the impossible dream....
Chainsaw
|
28.30 | Captain Carl | UPWARD::HEISER | Red Sea Beach Club | Fri Mar 30 1990 12:53 | 6 |
| Anyone see Yaz on "Good Morning America" the other day? He was
promoting his new autobiography.
Has anyone bought/read it yet?
Mike
|
28.31 | | SAGE::ROSS | Noting Lambada-style | Mon Apr 09 1990 13:09 | 4 |
| According to the RED_SOX notesfile, Wade Boggs has started 1990 with
2 straight hits and an RBI in his first AB with a man on base.
1990 = The Boggs .400 Watch
|
28.32 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN | Mon Apr 09 1990 13:24 | 5 |
|
Is that a new model by Timex? "The Boggs .400 Watch"
He'll probably come up with an injury and sit out the season.
Its the only way he'll ever hit over .400.
|
28.33 | | SAGE::ROSS | SC for me | Mon Apr 09 1990 13:41 | 4 |
| > Its the only way he'll ever hit over .400.
Maybe we should start a Cory Snyder/Keith Hernandez .200 watch instead?
|
28.34 | Opening day is here finally! | SALEM::DODA | Save me from tomorrow | Mon Apr 09 1990 13:41 | 3 |
| Hmmm, .400 sounds more like Cleveland's winning pct.....
daryll
|
28.35 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN | Mon Apr 09 1990 14:00 | 10 |
|
re: -2
Snyder will hit .200 or better... maybe not much better.
re: -1
Atleast there are living people who have seen the Indians win
a World Series. Without a #4 and #5 starter, you can count the
Sox out of it.
|
28.36 | | CRBOSS::DERRY | Do you know where nowhere is? | Mon Apr 09 1990 14:07 | 6 |
|
> Atleast there are living people who have seen the Indians win
> a World Series. Without a #4 and #5 starter, you can count the
> Sox out of it.
Hey, my gramps is alive. He was about 5 last time the Sox won it all.
|
28.37 | | PFSVAX::JACOB | We don't need no aluminum bats | Mon Apr 09 1990 14:09 | 9 |
| >> Atleast there are living people who have seen the Indians win
>> a World Series.
Yeah, true, but only because of advanced life support systems.
JaKe
|
28.38 | | BAUCIS::SAPP | Get up,Get up,Get busy do it..... | Mon Apr 09 1990 21:18 | 9 |
|
How `Bout the Clevescum Indians!!!Perrenial Paper Champs of the AL!!!
Cleveland has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the division.
A 4/5 starter you say???The Indians need a
1/2/3/4/5...............`Nuff said.
O_J
|
28.39 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Sucker that stole the soul ... | Tue Apr 10 1990 08:27 | 4 |
| Let's start the Joooooooosephineeeee Bell Watch : How many days
before he's sent to the minors ?
Doc
|
28.40 | | UPWARD::HEISER | don't sample me, don't sample me | Tue Apr 10 1990 10:06 | 1 |
| BOSOX ARE IN FIRST! BOSOX ARE IN FIRST! BOSOX ARE IN FIRST!
|
28.41 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Apr 10 1990 10:58 | 3 |
| true, but only 1 game out of last place. :*)
Lee
|
28.42 | 1 for the Yankees - GONG! (-: | CRBOSS::DERRY | Do you know where nowhere is? | Tue Apr 10 1990 10:59 | 1 |
|
|
28.43 | | 7983::RIEU | In search of...Mr Trout! | Tue Apr 10 1990 11:02 | 3 |
| But Karen, the Yanks now have the highest paid player in Baseball.
Ol' Spleenbinder has another 'lock' on the title!
Denny
|
28.44 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | iceMAN | Tue Apr 10 1990 11:16 | 2 |
|
The yankees and indians are both undefeated... until tonight!
|
28.45 | 7 seasons @ 200+ | UPWARD::HEISER | from the trendoid vortex of America | Tue Apr 10 1990 11:59 | 4 |
| Imagine how much Mattingly would have received if he hit like Boggs!
;-)
Mike
|
28.46 | | FTMUDG::DUGGAN | | Tue Apr 10 1990 14:52 | 7 |
| re .31:
"... two straight hits ... in his first at-bat"
NOT BAAAD!
...mike
|
28.47 | They've lost 2 straight now!! | PHILEM::SAPP | Bird,Magic,Jordan and Coleman | Sat Apr 14 1990 10:23 | 7 |
| The Red Sox suck!!!
`Nuff said
O_J
|
28.48 | | CAM::WAY | Tag Steam Tudding stakes dipseline Cikd | Sun Apr 15 1990 12:21 | 5 |
| �
� The Red Sox suck!!!
�
What vocabulary, what rhythmic phrasing, what angst.
|
28.49 | Thank you | BAUCIS::SAPP | Bird,Magic,Jordan and Coleman | Sun Apr 15 1990 18:38 | 1 |
|
|
28.50 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Mon Apr 16 1990 05:14 | 5 |
| O_J,
Please correct your reply. It should read "The Red Sox"[sic].
Lee :*)
|
28.51 | | TRACTR::BACH | Onward through the fog... | Mon Apr 16 1990 14:57 | 3 |
| 18 to nuthin'... WoW
Cub_Fan
|
28.52 | 18-nuthin? | CSC32::P_PAPACEK | | Mon Apr 16 1990 16:06 | 5 |
| re .-1
Forgive the ignorance, 18 to nuthin??? Todays Brewers - Sox score
perhaps.?
|
28.53 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Apr 16 1990 16:40 | 7 |
| 18 runs, 20 hits, 1 error and no homers for the Brewers. 0 runs,
2 hits, 1 error and 5 pitchers (Boddicker, Lamp, Kiecker, Rochford
and Leister) for the Sox.
We had a good time in the bleachers, though.
John
|
28.54 | Great day for a Sox hater | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Apr 17 1990 05:43 | 14 |
| Yeah, the most exciting part of the whole game was listening to
'Saw take on five 12-year-olds in a verbal battle.
The kids were from Medford, had it on their jackets. 'Saw says,
"Where you guys from?" One kid says, "Mefaa". The kid then says,
"Where are you from?" 'Saw, from Hartford, says, "Hafaa." I was
roollling.
Seems like there was always someone returning from a beer run, which
usually took an inning or so. They'd sit down, look at the board,
and say "9 to nuthin? What happened while I was gone?" Then, "13
to nuthin? What happened while I was gone?" This just kept happening.
Lee
|
28.55 | Needed the HelBus yesterday... | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 07:58 | 38 |
| Yeah, those 12 year olds were tough. I figure I gave 'em a good
handicap after all those beers I put down.
Actually, I wanted the blonde that was chaperoning them....
They did get a kick out of my Bart Simpson (who the hell are you)
T-shirt.
It was great meeting all the noters that I haven't met before.
It was great drinking all that beer and partying a little.
What was even better were the folks from MIT behind us. Had a lot
of fun with them. You shoulda heard 'em laugh when I mentioned
Avagadro's Number... (see, us old borderline alky's know a little about
science...)
The game was boring. Joe "Six two and even" Morgan handled his pitching
staff about as well as a junkie without a fix would handle tying his
shoes, and the pitchers he did use pitched like little league.
Near the end of the game everyone was rooting for the Brewers to make
it 20...
Other highlights:
The beer line was fun. Met lots of interesting people, and
had a good time.
The Men's 4x100 swimming relay that took place in the bleachers
Mens' Room was pretty interesting too. This guys with a BC
sweatshirt won hands down over this East German ringer on
steroids...
Great weather, got a little sun, great beer got a little hungover....
Got to do it again sometimes....
Chainsaw (from Harfaa)
|
28.56 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Apr 17 1990 08:29 | 3 |
| Also, one destroyed beachball in a moment of temporary insanity.
John
|
28.57 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Apr 17 1990 08:34 | 13 |
| Yeah, you really bit into that one, John.
For those of you not there, beachballs were all over the place.
For no apparent reason, John Hendry went wild when he managed to
capture one. He actually bit the nozzle right off the damn thing.
The crowd lustily booed him. Then, to make sure his prey was dead,
he ripped it in two.
Jeff Needle looked like Yasar Arrafat when he fashioned a hat out
of one of the pieces.
Lee
|
28.58 | Damn, did that feel good! | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Apr 17 1990 09:07 | 10 |
| What was even better is that the loudest of the Meffa Children's
Contingent was begging me for the ball. I then bit into it (and
I tore the valve completely out of it), then I ripped it in half,
then I spiked the remnants and then gave the kids my best "Don't
f**k with me, I'm crazy" look. That was tough, because I was fighting
to keep from bursting out laughing.
Someone's got to take over for Bob Stanley now that he's gone.
John
|
28.59 | | SALEM::RIEU | In search of...Mr Trout! | Tue Apr 17 1990 09:15 | 2 |
| John es mucho macho!!!
Denny ;^)
|
28.60 | Even *I* was scared.... | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 09:22 | 32 |
| Yes, I will second that statement.
Let me caution you folks, Do NOT, repeat DO NOT, misplace your
apostrophes. John Hendry, our usually calm, steady statistician
can be a wild man.
Hulk Hogan, who was at the game, had this to say:
I looked into those eyes, brother, and all of Hulkamania
trembled. The little Hulkamaniacs from Meffa in front
of him we're wondrin' brother, what caused a look like
that...
Mike Tyson, also at the game:
I saw John Hendry's eyes, when he bit into that beach ball
and I was scared. I didn't have my mouthpiece, and I was
scared that he might hit me and break my teef.
Then Robin gave me some lithium and I was ecstatic. I was
just ecstatic...
The rest of us were quaking in our shoes at the virility, and savageness
of John's eyes...
Beach Balls 0
Hendry 1
(a better game than the Sox....)
Chainsaw
|
28.61 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Apr 17 1990 09:25 | 16 |
| John was mucho pissed. I hate beachballs and waves. I believe
in day baseball.
In fact, I believe in the soul, the c*ck, the p*ssy, the small of a
woman's back, the hanging curveball, high fiber, good scotch, that
the novels of Susan Sontag are self-indulgent overrated crap. I
believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I believe that there
ought to be a constitutional amendment outlawing Astroturf (tm)
and the Designated Hitter. I believe in the sweet spot, soft core
pornography, opening your presents Christmas morning instead of
Christmas Eve, and I believe in long, slow, deep, soft wet kisses
that last three days.
So there.
John
|
28.63 | | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 09:30 | 8 |
| I'm shocked.
First, yesterday I heard the RCASO actuallys resembles a normal person,
and now I'm seeing a John Hendry I've never seen before...
Clearly, John es mas mucho! Clearly!!!
'Saw
|
28.64 | | FRSBEE::BROOKS | The roof is on fire ! ... | Tue Apr 17 1990 09:39 | 5 |
| I tell you, Hendry is a man's man ! HAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!
Boy, I never had so much fun staring down a brat in my life !
Heh heh heh .....
|
28.65 | Where sickness thrives | BUILD::MORGAN | | Tue Apr 17 1990 09:50 | 4 |
| What do you guys expect? The man's originally from Chelsea! Do NOT, I
repeat, DO NOT kcuf with anyone from Chelsea!
Steve
|
28.66 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Fahrvergn�ten! | Tue Apr 17 1990 09:57 | 8 |
| >> John was mucho pissed. I hate beachballs and waves. I believe
>> in day baseball.
You've still got a way to go, John. My bitten beachball count is 6 (and only
once did I think the crowd was going to riot against me). Now if we could just
find some way to bite the wave.
j.
|
28.67 | Good time. Crazy folk. | SASE::SZABO | Always practice safe fahrvergn�gening | Tue Apr 17 1990 10:08 | 10 |
| Absolutely rollward!!!
Mad Dog Hendry was awesome! Ripped that beach ball valve stem like a
true Pit Bull! Them Meffa boys were skeert $hitless! And I believe
that was the moment when A&W finally realized that there was not a
normal soul amongst us...... :-)
Yes, Mr. Needle makes a wonderful Yassir Arafat! :-)
H�wk
|
28.68 | | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 10:13 | 14 |
| � normal soul amongst us...... :-)
Nope, that's a given.
It was really funny. My brother, Alison and I showed up outside the Rat
at 0830. It wasn't supposed to open till 9, but the guy opens the door,
says "You all look like boozers, come on in...". Then he says, "The
bartender isn't here yet, but I'll draw you a couple"...
Too cool.
I know I'm not normal...8^)
'Saw
|
28.69 | | SALEM::RIEU | In search of...Mr Trout! | Tue Apr 17 1990 11:24 | 3 |
| who was the kicker for the Brewers yesterday and why did he miss
all those xtra points?!!
Denny
|
28.70 | | UPWARD::HEISER | i can c clearly now | Tue Apr 17 1990 11:25 | 1 |
| Sox were only 2 touchdowns from making it a game!
|
28.71 | Hey 'Saw, how 'bout that Kevin Romine? Is he great or what? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Tue Apr 17 1990 11:28 | 1 |
|
|
28.72 | MARGO WUZ NO TOO BLAM! | SASE::SZABO | Always practice safe fahrvergn�gening | Tue Apr 17 1990 11:34 | 8 |
| Just so happens, Denny, that I was either in the beer line or
navigating my way through the rough waters in the mens room, so I
missed the failed extra point attempts after the 2 touchdowns. I did,
however, witness the 2 field goals. Kevin Romine was the holder.....
:-)
H�wk (who could use a little nap this afternoon)
|
28.73 | | REFINE::ASHE | You better shop around... | Tue Apr 17 1990 11:45 | 2 |
| ....Way to go, Crash Hendry
|
28.75 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Apr 17 1990 11:54 | 9 |
| Nah. I'm here. I'm still savoring my victory over one of the forces
of evil.
We also have to mention A&W's bright shining moment when she yelled
at the Meffa contingent in front of us, in her best "Mom" voice,
to put down their banner so we could watch the game. Way to go,
Alison.
John
|
28.76 | | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:06 | 25 |
| Romine :== the Biggest Dog-It Player since Dave Winfield...
I couldn't believe the guy. He takes off after the shot into the
corner, and like all of a sudden he pulls up and just jogs.
Either that or my eyes flipped into slow motion....
Crash Hendry...too funny.
The rough waters in the men's room were exhausting. Personally, I
entered the Water Polo competition, the Whitewater Kayaking, and
the Individual Medley. I got a Silver Medal in the Kayaking.
The beer lines were pretty cool, but I kind of liked the Young SS
Security Forces better. Give some guy with a hokey crew cut
a walkie-talkie and he things he's got a wicked testosterone increase
or something.
It's a good thing Hendry didn't REALLY go as wild as he could have,
because I doubt the Hitler Youth could have contained him....
Gawd, I keep seeing Needle with that beach ball on his haid, and
I'm cracking up.
I need a nap too...
Chainsaw
|
28.77 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:12 | 6 |
| In case the rest of you were to drunk to see it, our little
Meffa contingent made ESPN's SportsCenter last night at 7:00.
Charlie Steiner made a comment about Fenway's Bleacher Creatures.
If he only knew how true it was.
/Don
|
28.78 | | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:23 | 12 |
| I think we should have made the Meffaa Kids honorary noters for the
day, or something like that. They were pretty funny, and the
blonde that was with their chaperone certainly was nicer to look
at than Kevin Romine's Plate-Stackable Butt....
Where ya from?
Meffaa, where you from?
Harfaa....
Chainsaw
|
28.79 | | FSHQA2::AWASKOM | | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:24 | 8 |
| I've been den mother to *lots* of groups of crazed sports fanatics.....
That's how I know how to deal with the tribe from Meffa.
And how do you guys know that *I'm* normal???!!??
A&W
|
28.80 | | SASE::SZABO | Chainsaw est mucho ecstatico! | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:26 | 2 |
|
|
28.81 | | SASE::SZABO | Chainsaw est mucho ecstatico! | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:31 | 6 |
| Hey A&W, nobody's accusing you of being normal!
That Mad Dog Hendry sure makes ya wonder about all the quiet types out
there! :-)
H�wk, Bronze Medalist, Individual Medley
|
28.82 | I'm Bart Simpson, who the hell are you? | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:33 | 10 |
| Well, not only did the Meffa Mafia make the news, so did
Mad Dog Hendry biting the Nozzle of that beach ball...
In fact, the guys on Sports Channel's Sprotsworld used a telestrator
to highlight John's technique. Again, they mentioned the crazed look
in his eyes...
Seriously folks, it was something to behold...
Chainsaw
|
28.83 | | SASE::SZABO | Chainsaw est mucho ecstatico! | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:41 | 6 |
| > .....it was something to behold.
Tell me about it. Ah was right nexted to MDHendry, and ah'll tell ya,
even I was skeert! That look, oh that crazed look....... :-)
H�wk
|
28.84 | drunk and stupid is noway to go thru life | HPSRAD::SANTOS | Its hammer time | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:53 | 16 |
|
Hey Doc, using my sunglasses to give those little guys the stare down
was the key. The kid on the end (the one that looked like a little
Charles Barkley) behaved for a whole 2 minutes.
I'm sorry I missed John Hendry act, I think he might have seen that
turtle movie that is out now and he refuses to control is aggression.
Frank Way looks just like one of the guys from the group Alabama.
It was a pleasure to meet some of you guys and gals (Hawk,\Don,John
Hendry,Lee Timmons,A&W,Frank Way). I want to thank my buddy Jeff
Needle for introducing me as Ralph Caso to a few people.
As for myself I have an all-time top 5 hangover today.
Chuck
|
28.85 | I don't know if the parents were thankful or terrified ! | EARRTH::BROOKS | The roof is on fire ! ... | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:55 | 3 |
| Tis true Chuck, thanks for the shades ..... if you think the kid
was intimidated, you shoulda saw the parents ! They thought I was
going to slaughter the whole row !
|
28.86 | | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:55 | 19 |
| Yes, yes, yes...
I'll tell you, in my time I've looked many crazed maniacal lunatics right
in the eye, and stared them down. I've looked into the eyes of the
Hellspawn creatures that inhabit the boonies where I live.
Why once, I even stared down Ol' Scratch hisself, but never...never...
Never have I felt such fear when I looked into MadDogHendry's eyes
while his still foaming mouth clutched and shook that recently deceased
beach ball. It was incredible.
Why, I almost expected him to just cut a swatch of carnage and destruction
right down to the field, and then to battle off a few of the Hitler Youth
SS Security guards while working his way out to the mound...
Scary thought.....
chainsaw
|
28.87 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Apr 17 1990 12:59 | 13 |
| I don't run fast enough to avoid the security troops while on the
way to the mound. Heck, I probably wouldn't have even gotten as
far as Kevin Romine before being tackled and hauled off to the Charles
Street jail.
What I really wanted was that football being tossed around. I believe
it was one of those foam rubber ones. If y'all thought the destruction
of the beachball was crazy, you should have seen me had I got my
hands on that.
And, I was completely sober too.
John
|
28.88 | eyes that would make Mike Singletary proud! | UPWARD::HEISER | Simon Peter's School of Surf | Tue Apr 17 1990 13:05 | 1 |
|
|
28.89 | | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 13:09 | 16 |
| The esteemed Mr Santos waxes too humble folks.
For a Cowboys fan, he's an okay guy.
You see, he entered the Olympics going on in the baffroom. Amazing
waters sports athlete.
He took gold in the 200 meter backstroke, and the 100 meter freestyle.
He captained the Water Polo team to a gold medal, and finished
second in the Grand Prix Jet Ski race...
And he wasn't the only one to have a hangover...
BLAM BLAM BLAM,
Chainsaw
|
28.90 | | FSHQA2::AWASKOM | | Tue Apr 17 1990 13:50 | 11 |
| Gentlemen -
The John Hendry known and beloved of the noters is a man of many,
many talents. Factual reporting is but one of them. So is his
ability to subdue a beach ball.
Please also consider that JHENDRY was the *only* gentleman there
to know both women in attendance, and to arrive with one and leave
with the other :-) .....
A&W
|
28.91 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | The roof is on fire ! ... | Tue Apr 17 1990 13:53 | 5 |
| re .90
Oooooh .......
I tell you, the things John does to impress the women .....
|
28.92 | | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Tue Apr 17 1990 14:00 | 17 |
| � Please also consider that JHENDRY was the *only* gentleman there
� to know both women in attendance, and to arrive with one and leave
� with the other :-) .....
I know who I want for my Tag Team Studding Partner!!!!!
I am impressed. Duly impressed.
It was quite a day, let me tell you. A day that will live in Infamy.
From the first call of "Wade, I've got no underwear on" to the
last vestiges of "Romine you stiff, go back to New Britain" we had
an unbelievable good time.
I daresay we had a better time than the players (well, those from
Boston anyway) and it was a nice day weather wise....
Chainsaw
|
28.93 | Was Al Pacino 'Cruising' there? | SHALOT::MEDVID | Kristos Vos Kres | Wed Apr 18 1990 07:48 | 12 |
| >Amazing waters sports athlete.
>
>He took gold in the 200 meter backstroke, and the 100 meter freestyle.
>He captained the Water Polo team to a gold medal, and finished
>second in the Grand Prix Jet Ski race...
Water sports? Gold, as in shower? Hmmmmmm. Just what kind of
afternoon did you gentlemen have. I was planning on going to Fenway
while on a business trip in May, but if that kind of stuff goes on...
--dan'l
|
28.94 | Baffroom Olympics... | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Wed Apr 18 1990 08:29 | 29 |
| Dan'l --
It was amazing! By about the 3rd inning, or the Red Sox trailing
by 9, I forget which, I went to the bathroom.
At that point in time there was about three to five inches of water
on the floor. There's this old usher in there setting up swimmers'
starting blocks and next thing you know he's yelling "Last call
for Individual Medlay". So, I says to myself, what the heck...
I stripped down to my shorts, grabbed lane 8 and swam. I didn't
do that well, so I got dressed, went back out, grabbed two
beers, and watched some of the game.
Nexted time I went in there, they were starting the White Water
Kayaking Event. I signed up, got this boat, and rowed my a__
off, and lo and behold, I finished SECOND! I got me a Silver medal.
Since I'd told the guys about it after that first swim, nexted thing
I know there all in there. Jeez, Chuck was playin' water polo
(the East German team was tough, but we beat 'em) and Hawk was
doing the backstroke....
By all means, dude, go in May, but get into TRAINING NOW!!!! The
competition is really stiff, and you've got to watch out for the
Eastern Bloc Countries.....
Hope this helps,
'Saw
|
28.95 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Wed Apr 18 1990 08:40 | 7 |
| EARRTH::BROOKS "The roof is on fire ! ..." 3 lines 17-APR-1990 11:55
� -< I don't know if the parents were thankful or terrified ! >-
The sight of you *finally* being able to pick on someone your own
size probably had their parents quite amused, if anything. 8^)
/Don
|
28.96 | And the final tally is in! | CAM::WAY | Will you yield, and this avoid? | Wed Apr 18 1990 08:41 | 5 |
|
Q: How many beers did Chainsaw have at the Patriots' Dayu
Sox game?
A: Avagadro's Number!
|
28.97 | just love the boston soap opera | CNTROL::CHILDS | This guy's a waste of skin | Thu Apr 19 1990 08:45 | 16 |
|
Did anyone else read Callahan reply's to little Mikey Greenwall's
tirade with the press?
forget how it went exactly but Greenteeth (tm) was threating to wring
a few writers neck and this guy recommend that the writer just pretend
to be a low and away slider with the bases loaded and Mike would be
sure to miss......of course his buddy Boggsies back him all the way on
what beast the sportswriters in boston are....
and Clemens will throw out his arm by June. He still doesn't know how
to pitch. He still wants to overpower everybody. He really overpowered
Ventura last night....
;^)....
|
28.98 | | 7983::RIEU | Stanley, won't you please come home! | Thu Apr 19 1990 09:01 | 3 |
| Are the sportswriters Dreamwell (tm) is threatening to strangle, the
same ones he was whining to when he wanted more dough?
Denny
|
28.99 | Inept | SALEM::DODA | Don't have a cow, man | Thu Apr 19 1990 09:09 | 9 |
| Great line in the Red Sox file I think,
"During spring training, Roger Clemens wore #14 to honor Jim
Rice, during the regular season, Mike Greenwell will honor Rice
by playing like him..."
ha ha
daryll
|
28.100 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Apr 19 1990 10:19 | 9 |
| Enough of this negative talk. It's the nattering nabobs of
negativism (NNoN) who are causing the Sox to slide. Not the lack
of pitching, not the lack of a first baseman, not the fact that Mike
Greenwell treats every pitch and every fly ball to the outfield like
a tax audit (to be avoided at all costs), not that thier keystone
combination has the range of a sixpack of Keystone beer. It's the
writers, it's the fans. It's the same old story.
/Don
|
28.101 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Apr 19 1990 11:02 | 14 |
| Slasher, you got it right. Them righters is the real problem with
the Sox.
Right after them Sox beat my Tigers for the 3rd time, one Globe
writer commented on how tame the Tigers are, and how they are sure
to be in the cellar at the end of the season. Another Globe writer in
a different column, same page, was touting the Sox as the greatest
team ever, their having truly stomped that Detroit team. . Pure
bullshit, both of them.
Wonder who was in the booth last Monday? Boy he sure screwed the
Bostons that day. :*)
Lee
|
28.102 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | CyYoung,SandyKoufax,Sportswriters | Thu Apr 19 1990 11:10 | 2 |
|
|
28.103 | | CAM::WAY | Or, guilty in defence, be thus destroyed? | Thu Apr 19 1990 12:31 | 13 |
| �< Note 28.102 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "CyYoung,SandyKoufax,Sportswriters" >
/Don, clearly you don't mean *THE* Sportswriters (� SportsChannel)
do you? Those guys are the closest things to Sports Noters outside
of DEC?
You must mean them weenies in the Bahstahn papahs, eh?
Deen to wonk(tm)
'Saw
|
28.104 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Hercules,Thor,RayBourque | Thu Apr 19 1990 12:59 | 8 |
| No 'Saw, after following baseball for all these years I've come
to the conclusion that any team's sportswriters cain ruin a great
ballplayer's career. Their barbs and criticisms cain do more damage
than any great pitcher could ever dream of doing. Whenever a team
or player goes bad who's to blame? The media. I'll tell ya, the
Sox should sign some of these media guys up as pitchers.
/Don
|
28.105 | | CAM::WAY | Chainsaw, The Great Corruptor | Thu Apr 19 1990 13:26 | 2 |
| Well, then I wanna draft Telendar, because he might not throw a
great barb, but he certainly can get his wit over....
|
28.106 | Wrigly & Comisky last year, Fenway this year; what a job! | SHALOT::MEDVID | Happy Earth Day! | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:06 | 11 |
| Hey, I just found out I'm going to run up to Lotus on Monday, April 30
to deliver some ALL-IN-1 training. Schedule says the Sox are playing
Seattle. True?
Can any of you guys give me hints on how to get two tickets? Should I
rely on scalpers or is there a cheaper way? At Wrigley, they had SRO
seats for $5. Does Fenway?
Thanks in advance.
--dan'l
|
28.107 | | CAM::WAY | Yeah, Ma, it's Cliff..your SON Cliff | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:09 | 11 |
| Dan'l --
Talk to the Hawkstah, but I know you can get bleacher seats for
$6.
Make sure you visit the Men's Room off the bleacher area. That is
the site of the Baffroom Olympics, something you shouldn't miss, and
which will enhance your Fenway experience....
Good luck,
'Saw
|
28.108 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:13 | 6 |
| A Monday night game this early in the season should be no problem
for getting tickets anywhere in the ballpark.
Mariners are also here May 1 and 2.
John
|
28.109 | Dreaming of the Green Monster | SHALOT::MEDVID | Happy Earth Day! | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:17 | 11 |
| 'Saw,
I've already packed my water polo cap. Yeah, I actually have one from
my water polo days. Looks stupid as hell. Of course, I wouldn't say
that to the face of most H20 polo players. They're a mean lot.
John,
Does that mean I can just grab two (tickets that is) at the gate?
--dan'l
|
28.110 | | IAMOK::AHEARN | Rams vs. Bengals in SB XXV | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:27 | 5 |
| Yes. There will be ample tickets available at the gate.
Nelly
|
28.111 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Watcher of the skies | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:50 | 4 |
| Make sure you wear a condom over your haid...Cain't be to safe swimmin'
'round the floors of the Fenway Baffroom.
Mark.
|
28.112 | | SASE::SZABO | Freakin' Lunatics Club Cardholder | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:52 | 5 |
| You can also usually find people selling tickets, especially on that
big bridge over the Mass Pike right next to the ballpark. I got rid of
2 tickets there very easily last monday just before the game.....
H�wk
|
28.113 | | CAM::WAY | Watcher of the thighs | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:52 | 8 |
| Nah, ain't no problem. Just look at me 'n Hawk. We did it...No
problem....
Seriously, there's a lot of chlorine in that water, so you'd better
bring your swimmer's shampoo ....
chainsaw
|
28.114 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Sixers=Atlantic Div Champs | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:54 | 6 |
| I'll be in the greater NE area between May 29 and June 1. Will the Red
Sox be home for any of those dates, and if so, who will they be
playing?
Dennis
|
28.115 | | CAM::WAY | Ma, it's Cliff...your SON Cliff! | Fri Apr 20 1990 13:54 | 6 |
| �
� You can also usually find people selling tickets, especially on that
� big bridge over the Mass Pike right next to the ballpark. I got rid of
� 2 tickets there very easily last monday just before the game.....
Yeah, but Hawk, I saw you...you just tossed them off the bridge...
|
28.116 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Watcher of the skies | Fri Apr 20 1990 14:09 | 15 |
| < Note 28.114 by GRANPA::DFAUST "Sixers=Atlantic Div Champs" >
> I'll be in the greater NE area between May 29 and June 1.
Greater NE area? Sounds like New Hampshire. :^)
> Will the Red Sox be home for any of those dates, and if so, who will
> they be playing?
Sorry, the Sox will be in Texas getting shut out by Ryan et. al.
Mark.
Dennis
|
28.117 | | GRANPA::DFAUST | Sixers=Atlantic Div Champs | Fri Apr 20 1990 14:47 | 9 |
|
re:-1
Actually, Littleton.
But that's still far enough away from Arlington, TX to make going to
the game geographically unattractive.
;*)
Dennis
|
28.118 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Friends of Animals game supper, May 1st | Mon Apr 23 1990 07:42 | 6 |
|
Interesting observation: The Bruins outscored the Red Sox this
pasted weekend, and the Sox played two more games!
-Dick
|
28.119 | The Red Sux... | CAM::WAY | Guest Host on The Nude Talk Show | Mon Apr 23 1990 08:58 | 9 |
| Was that Kutcher or Greenwell who bobbled that single in Saturday's
debacle?
I saw the replay on three newscasts and I sure couldn't tell.
At any rate, I have a feeling I might be opening some beers for Beak
this year...
'Saw
|
28.120 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Honesty is money in the cemetary | Mon Apr 23 1990 09:08 | 3 |
| Neither, it was Romine.
Mark.
|
28.121 | | CAM::WAY | Guest Host on The Nude Talk Show | Mon Apr 23 1990 09:36 | 1 |
| Oh! That STIFF again....
|
28.122 | The media did in the Sox again this weekend... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | SaveOurFatPeople-CelebrateGirthDay | Mon Apr 23 1990 10:52 | 1 |
|
|
28.123 | Go Bruins! | CRBOSS::DERRY | Mikey Greenwell for Pampers. WAAAH! | Mon Apr 23 1990 11:12 | 2 |
| Lamp looked pretty good yesterday. With the exception of Pena, can't
say much for the bats.
|
28.124 | | CAM::WAY | Guest Host on The Nude Talk Show | Mon Apr 23 1990 11:15 | 4 |
| I think the bats were out celebratiing EArth Day, along with
the squirrels, the robins, and the ducks, and the gators...
'Saw
|
28.125 | say it aint so! | SCCAT::BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard WRO3-2 | Thu Apr 26 1990 14:20 | 7 |
| OH NO! You mean to tell me that the Red Flops have actually let Bill
Buckner back on the team? (saw it on TV last night...couldn't believe
my eyes) Little wonder that Boston is the perennial goat of the AL when
they allow the guy who earned them the most infamy to return.This has
to have a negative impact on ticket sales!
Ken
|
28.126 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Hindenburg, Titanic, Canadiens | Thu Apr 26 1990 14:25 | 7 |
|
Apparently all is forgiven with Billy-Buck. When he was announced
on opening day he received the loudest, longest cheers (not jeers)
of all.
Dickster
|
28.127 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Fahrvergn�ten! | Thu Apr 26 1990 14:34 | 8 |
| At the game on Tuesday, he came out as a pinch-hitter and received a 1/2 minute
standing ovation before being announced. After hitting an RBI bloop single, he
got another standing ovation for about a minute.
I've got to admit I admire his gumption. He deserves to have won the fans
back. I hope he sticks but don't think he has a chance in hell.
j.
|
28.128 | | CAM::WAY | A fool's bolt is soon shot | Thu Apr 26 1990 15:06 | 5 |
| The two preceeding replies are what will happen to you if you
don't JUST SAY NO. [many many 8^)]
Billy Buck was a stiff, is a stiff, and always will be a stiff.
|
28.129 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Fahrvergn�ten! | Thu Apr 26 1990 16:04 | 7 |
| >> Billy Buck was a stiff, is a stiff, and always will be a stiff.
Yeah, but he's OUR stiff.
Anyway, didn't mean to start a rathole. Just wanted to get my opinion in.
j.
|
28.130 | Buckner should play | JURAN::MCKAY | | Thu Apr 26 1990 16:36 | 11 |
| Billy Buck is not a stiff!!!! It's funny how everyone can remember
one boot which cost us but can't remember what a great contribution
he made while a sox player. I'm sure some stat monger out there can
supply some info that backs this up. I think it would be a mistake
to get rid of him and I also would like to see him as the everyday
first baseman. I have the weekend season package and I'd rather
watch Buckner than the combined Quintana, Robidoux. He always could
hit and he always will be able to hit, and he plays adequate defense
so let him play and dump one of the others.
Jimbo
|
28.131 | | CAM::WAY | A fool's bolt is soon shot | Fri Apr 27 1990 08:02 | 7 |
| Yeah, I heard he went to China in the off season, where the surgeons
replaced his ankles with these new bionic things....8^)
Yes, Billy Buck is our stiff, and we all know that everyone needs a
good stiff one from time to time...
'saw
|
28.132 | My great aunt can run faster than Buckna. | JACKAL::DIGGINS | Boy I wish I had Talant! | Fri Apr 27 1990 09:32 | 6 |
|
Speak for yourself, 'SAW!!! 8^)
Steve_who_hopes_yer_talking_about_drinks
|
28.133 | | CAM::WAY | A fool's bolt is soon shot | Fri Apr 27 1990 09:48 | 4 |
| � Steve_who_hopes_yer_talking_about_drinks
Wiffout a doubt!
|
28.134 | As D. Tracy would say:"non compos mentis" | SCCAT::BOUCHARD | Ken Bouchard WRO3-2 | Fri Apr 27 1990 12:58 | 4 |
| They gave Buckner a standing ovation,huh? The Boston fans kinda remind
me of the voters in NH who re-elected a guy in jail.
Ken (who's glad he's not a Bosox fan anymore)
|
28.135 | Get off the ego trip, Buckner, and retire! | 4159::NAZZARO | Hal! Open the pod bay door!! | Fri Apr 27 1990 14:09 | 16 |
| Billy-Buck is perfect for the Sox, the kind of me-first-second-
and-always kinda guy the Sox have always had on their roster.
He'd have fit in perfect with those Yaz-Evans teams of "25 cabs
for 25 players." I'll bet he and Boggs are best buddies, swapping
stories about how many hits they have while not moving runners
along in games.
I hate it when the only reason a player stays in any professional
sport is to satisfy his ego. Buckner just had to prove to himself
that hew could do it, which is fine if you're a marathoner, golfer
or tennis player. But in a team sport, even one like baseball where
individual skills are prized as much as team goals, a player should
put the needs of the team ahead of personal goals. Buckner shows
me no signs of doing that.
NAZZ
|
28.137 | Grand� smiley | WFOV11::MORRISON | Beware the Roulette Wheel of Death | Fri Apr 27 1990 14:27 | 8 |
|
Steven,
I don't think "held down" is the correct term. It was more
along the lines of "couldn't get up 'cause the fans were look-
ing for his wallet"
Bull~
|
28.138 | | CAM::WAY | A fool's bolt is soon shot | Fri Apr 27 1990 14:52 | 7 |
| Well, that Buckner ego cost the Sox a series.
We all know that whoever-the-farg-the-manager was wanted Buck
out. But Buck threw a tantrum, spread his legs and the
rest is history....
'Saw
|
28.139 | Bill Buckner: roadblock to player development | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | Oh+ | Fri Apr 27 1990 14:53 | 19 |
| >Billy Buck is not a stiff!!!! It's funny how everyone can remember
>one boot which cost us but can't remember what a great contribution
>he made while a sox player.
*I* do remember the contributions that Buckner made, and let me assure
you, they were not "great". He was fortunate for a time (such as his
time in Wrigley and Fenway, the 2 best hitting parks) that his stats
looked decent in some categories. He wasn't fooling me though. I
agree with Frank: Stiff, all the way. Overrated stiff.
>I think it would be a mistake
>to get rid of him and I also would like to see him as the everyday
>first baseman.
You must dislike the Sox even more than I do. I'd make great company
at a Yankee game with those season tickets you have. That way we could
both root against the Sox, and for Buckner to get more playing time.
Dan
|
28.140 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Fahrvergn�ten! | Sat Apr 28 1990 18:44 | 3 |
| >>Anyway, didn't mean to start a rathole.
Well, so much for this.
|
28.141 | YAZ ball and baseball cards at auction | 39225::LOMBARDO | He spoke the Incarnation! | Wed May 02 1990 23:14 | 19 |
|
I know of a charity auction this Friday night - May 4th at the Marlboro
Girls Club to benefit New Covenant Christian School in Ashland, Ma.
I am helping to co-ordinate it. Tonight we found out that we are
having Carl 'YAZ' Yastremski autograph and Federal Express
a baseball to us tomorrow. (His daughter is moving to a house
that one of the auction coordinators currently lives in.)
We also have 15 shoeboxes full of baseball cards to be auctioned.
The viewing of the items starts at 6pm and the auction at 7pm.
The Marlboro Girls CLub is on Pleasant street which intersects route
20.
Please contact me, Lisa Lombardo DTN 291-0590 or REJOIC::LOMBARDO for further
details on any of the above. thank you. or at home 508-485-2272 or
508-485-3630
|
28.142 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Fri May 04 1990 12:02 | 5 |
| �He still doesn't know how to pitch.
Well, Mikey, I see you are still holding on to your theories even
though just about everyone who follows baseball disagrees with this
one.
|
28.143 | | LEVERS::STROUT | no hero in your tragedy... | Fri May 04 1990 12:09 | 2 |
| What's the Red Sox record this year anyways? Is there division
shaping up to be a Least?
|
28.144 | What are you gonna do with a quarter? | SALEM::DODA | THEmoonMYbuttWHICHisBIGGER?nextONoprah | Fri May 04 1990 12:14 | 6 |
| About even to this point, 4 teams over .500 in the East.
3 playing over .500 in the west.
Of course, you could always pick up a paper....
daryll
|
28.145 | | LEVERS::STROUT | no hero in your tragedy... | Fri May 04 1990 12:16 | 3 |
| dam papers always gone when i get here. bugs the hell outta me.
besides, i'm not too much of a freakin' baseball lunatic, just
wunnerin' what the sit was. tanks.
|
28.146 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri May 04 1990 17:07 | 7 |
| Announced at 510 EDT tonight - Lee Smith to St Louis for Tom Brunansky,
even up. Gets rid of the log jam at short reliever, improves the
right field situation, probably consigns Evans to the bench for
the rest of his career, does nothing to help the starting pitching.
But it's a start.
John
|
28.147 | | DREAMN::MCDONOUGH | | Fri May 04 1990 21:19 | 7 |
|
I was hoping this trade wasn't going to materialize. I think StL.
got the better of deal. Stats anyone for Brunansky for the last
couple of years?
-Dick
|
28.148 | | SAGE::ROSS | Quarantined | Mon May 07 1990 05:58 | 10 |
| I don't like the Smith for Brunansky deal UNLESS the Red Sox also
make a move to trade Greenwell or Burks for a very good starting
pitcher. Why? Well, what hope do guys like Mickey Pina, Phil
Plantier, Carlos Quintana, etc. have of making it to the majors
as everyday players if the Sox keep all three OF for three or four
more years?
I'd like to see a Burks to the Mets deal for Darling and Magadan.
Or how about Greenwell to the Royals for Seitzer and Montgomery?
|
28.149 | He's already gone | BUILD::MORGAN | | Mon May 07 1990 08:16 | 13 |
| >Why? Well, what hope do guys like Mickey Pina, Phil
>Plantier, Carlos Quintana, etc. have of making it to the majors
>as everyday players if the Sox keep all three OF for three or four
>more years?
Doug, Brunansky will be gone next winter. I'll predict right now, the
Sox won't sign him. Manangement already planted the rumor. He's from
California and has expressed an interest in playing there. Plantier
and/or Pina will be with the big club next year. Much cheaper
salaries.
Steve
|
28.150 | he's a bonehead | CNTROL::CHILDS | The odor of the Fungus never fouler | Mon May 07 1990 11:56 | 9 |
|
that's right Mac, I am. The guy has 3 or 4 pitches but everytime he
gets in trouble or batter gets to him, he throws the heat. I know the
batter knows. In the first few innings he gets by with it but by the
late innings they catch up to him.....
I don't question his physical abitlity just his mental ability...
mike
|
28.151 | Pahk the cah and meet at the Golden Ahches. | SHALOT::MEDVID | the infinite complexities of love | Tue Jun 12 1990 07:18 | 5 |
| A huge "THANK YOU" to John Hendry for helping me aquire tickets to
Sunday's game at Fenway Pahk. The Sox stunk, but I got to see a great game
by Candiotti. The knuckleballer was at his best.
--dan'l
|
28.152 | Did he bite any beachballs for you? | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Jun 12 1990 07:33 | 0 |
28.153 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Jun 12 1990 08:53 | 7 |
| I wasn't there. I got him in contact with someone who had a pair
of extra tickets to sell. And Jeff, with all the beachballs flying
around on Friday night, not one of them came anywhere close to me
and I was sitting in the bleachers. They must have all developed
radar!
John
|
28.154 | | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Tue Jun 12 1990 15:57 | 8 |
| I got my bicuspids into two of the rainbow-colored demons. Nearly cost me my
life. Some ass in the upper deck spent the rest of the game throwing garbage
at my head. Sure made friends with the people around me who also got pummeled.
Of course, they were too busy jumping around after beachballs and waiting for
the wave to care too much. Got 3 cokes spilled on me because these jerks were
going after beachballs.
j.
|
28.155 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:00 | 2 |
|
Yanks spank hapless Sox... he he he
|
28.156 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | SCS...Call Anytime, Anywhere | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:21 | 12 |
| W L GB
Toronto 33 27 -
Hapless Boston 31 26 �
Baltimore 29 29 3
Milwaukee 27 29 4
Less than Hapless Cleveland 26 30 5
Kind of like that movie on Fox "Less than Zero"
/Don
|
28.157 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:23 | 6 |
|
Wasn't Cleveland 7 games behind Boston on sunday morning?
Less than hapless - last world championship 1948
????????????????? - last world championship 1918
|
28.158 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | SCS...Call Anytime, Anywhere | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:26 | 4 |
| So the Indians picked up a whopping two games. Whew, better
call the Fire Department, that team is smoking!
/Don
|
28.159 | Can't ever remember them doin' much | BUILD::MORGAN | | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:28 | 7 |
| In my 33 years of living, I've never once heard of Cleveland having a
respectable baseball team. Yup, I remember McDowell and Collovito, but
have any of you Cleveland fans been around to see them win ANYTHING?
And you have to love the way they just pack that stadium every night.
Steve
|
28.160 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:47 | 13 |
| Steve, I'm older so I remember the 1954 Indians. Truly, a GREAT
team during the regular season, won 111 games, I believe, out of
154.
But, come crunch time, they got wiped, swept, zapped by the Giants.
So, they were a REGULAR team during the Fall Classic.
By the way, the Indians were known for great pitching, rather than
hitting or defense, during the 50's. Early Wynn, Bob Feller, Bob
Lemon, etc. Not that they didn't have hitters, such as Colavity,
Rosen, but their forte was pitching.
Lee
|
28.161 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Wed Jun 13 1990 10:59 | 3 |
| Cleveland fans must live in the past when it concerns ANY sport.
One of their teams doesn't even have a past.
Denny
|
28.162 | Yup, lots of exciting games over the years!!!! | TURKEY::J_HALPIN | | Wed Jun 13 1990 11:06 | 9 |
|
I think the most exciting baseball game to take place in Cleveland
during my lifetime (I'm not as old as Lee :->!!! ) was a promotional night
back arround the early 70's, Nickle-a-Beer night!!! I beleive the riot
squad had to be called in to clear out the stadium!!! I can't remember
who the Indians played or who won however....
JimH
|
28.163 | Can't remember who won though... | ROULET::WHITEHAIR | Don't just sit there.......Do it now! | Wed Jun 13 1990 11:29 | 18 |
|
The Indians played the Texas Rangers.....I was there man......
It was something else.....the streaker.........another streaker.....
A woman who sat just 5 rows down from my Dad and I got up and jumped
the fence, running out onto the field with her purse in hand, went
over to the home plate ump and hit him with her purse, several times.
She was escorted off the field. You should have seen all the trash
that landed on the field.... After the game...there police all
over the place...on horses...billy clubs out!
I wasn't able to drink then but I do know Good Old Dad had his
share of those 5 cent cups. Lots of the guys around us were trying
to catch foul balls with their cups...some over a foot stacked.
It was so funny!
The Chief
|
28.164 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Jun 13 1990 11:32 | 5 |
|
re: -1
Indians v.s. the Rangers, I believe... free entertainment!
|
28.165 | courtesy of Marv Albert.. | SALEM::DODA | Friends don't let friends drive Chevys | Wed Jun 13 1990 11:39 | 7 |
| I remember that. The management boys were real morons on that
one. .05 beer night, what did they expect?
Next it'll be "Hard liquor and handgun" night.
daryll
|
28.166 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Post no p-names | Wed Jun 13 1990 11:47 | 11 |
| < Note 28.165 by SALEM::DODA "Friends don't let friends drive Chevys" >
-< courtesy of Marv Albert.. >-
>Next it'll be "Hard liquor and handgun" night.
>
>daryll
Don't none of you booze-a-holics come messin' around us handgun
owners.
Mark.
|
28.167 | Disco sucks | BUILD::MORGAN | | Wed Jun 13 1990 12:34 | 11 |
| Wasn't there a game a few years back called "Disco something-or-other"?
Anyone who brought a disco album got in for 1/2 price or nothing. I
also think there was a planned concert after the game that ended up
being cancelled because of people chucking albums around like frisbees.
Then there was a bonfire in center field where all the albums were
burned.
I can't recall the city this game was played in, but for some reason I
thought it was Cleveland or Chicago?
Steve
|
28.168 | | FSHQA1::AWASKOM | | Wed Jun 13 1990 12:40 | 4 |
| It was a Bill Veeck special at Comisky in Chicago. (I cain't believe
I know this :-) )
A&W
|
28.169 | Disco bombed at Commiskey | POBOX::ALVES | Dolphin-Free Computing | Wed Jun 13 1990 12:43 | 8 |
|
I believe that disco debacle occurred at Commiskey when Bill Veeck
owned the team in the mid to late 70's.
Again, my memory isn't very clear, but wasn't it a double-header, and
the White Sox had to forfeit the second game?
Brian
|
28.170 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Wed Jun 13 1990 13:12 | 15 |
| It was an anti-disco night at Comiskey. The festivities were held
between games of a doubleheader. A small riot ensued and the Sox
did have to forfeit.
My favorite promotion was seat cushion night at Fenway back in 1982.
It was vs the Indians and the game got out of hand quickly. The
cushions were great for clapping together to celebrate a home run.
They were even better as frisbees scaled onto the field. A bunch
of them ended up in the Sox bullpen, and Bob Stanley lit them on
fire and did an Indian War Dance around the fire. Needless to say,
the Sox have never done that again.
No, I didn't destroy any seat cushions. I kept mine.
John
|
28.171 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Wed Jun 13 1990 13:17 | 3 |
| Just got some tickets for the DECWORLD set-up crew for the 29th vs.
Texas, anyone else gonna be there?
Denny
|
28.172 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | No feathers on me!!! | Wed Jun 13 1990 13:24 | 6 |
| re promotions.
In "The Bronx Zoo" Sparky Lyle talks about Reggie bar day. Where
everyone at the game got a free Reggie Bar. During the game Reggie hit
a homer and the fans covered the field with the bars. Some kids ended
up running onto the field and scooped up a bunch of 'em.
|
28.173 | Disco Demolition | CSC32::P_PAPACEK | | Wed Jun 13 1990 13:55 | 14 |
|
re: Disco night
Perhaps this belongs in White Sox note, but it was called Disco
Demolition. The Disco records were blown up in between games of the
double header. Fans then poured out onto the field tearing up sod,
bases etc. The Sox forfeited due to unplayable conditions.
Steve Dahl now a famous and controversial DJ in Chicago was mc for
the event. One of his early claims to fame, and the subject still
comes up frequently in Chicago. Disco did Suck, so I suppose it
was worth the Sox forfeiting a game.
|
28.174 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | This is gonna be fun | Wed Jun 13 1990 14:44 | 8 |
| I read somewhere recently that to this day they're still finding
slivers of disco records in the Comiskey Park turf.
Getting back to the other Sox they better not look back, something
black and orange might be gaining on them... ;-)
py
|
28.175 | Narrow those tastes Frankie.... | PARVAX::WARDLE | Counting the cars on the NJ Tpk... | Wed Jun 13 1990 15:25 | 3 |
| Frank Way loved Disco...right Frankwa?
JoJ
|
28.176 | Cause I'm a hoochie-coochie man... | CAM::WAY | Terminate with extreme prejudice | Thu Jun 14 1990 08:59 | 26 |
| Not by a long shot.
During the disco era I was in college. As a music major we thought
the whole thing was pretty bogus.
What we were doing at the time was cramming four or five people and
their axes into practice rooms, locking the door, lighting up,
and playing some of the meanist blues this side of the Delta.
Muddy Waters, B.B. King, John Lee Hooker, Howlin' Wolf...that's
what we cut our teeth on. Any tune by Willie Dixon was fair
game... We even had some original tunes, and when this got really
"hazy" we'd just jam for a while.
Learned to play a little harp during this period too, althought I couldn't
come close to some of the dudes we had in these sessions.
"Gypsy Woman tol' my mama, before I was born
Got a boy-child comin', gonna be a son-of-a-gun...."
So, while everyone was doing the hustle, we were tryin' to pay our dues....
Course, rooting for the Sox during that period made it easy to play
the blues! 8^)
|
28.177 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Madonna and ASICS.. A WINNING COMBO | Thu Jun 14 1990 11:42 | 7 |
| thats cool about harp and all, as long as ya didnt play any flutes
frankie
haaaaaaa
dinz
|
28.178 | | CAM::WAY | Terminate with extreme prejudice | Thu Jun 14 1990 12:25 | 10 |
| Nah, we left the flute playing for all those Jethro Tull types....
But man, I'll tell ya, we had some guys who played harp that if you
closed your eyes, you'd have thought it was Little Walter or
James Cotton!
As the late Sammy Davis Jr woulda said "Those cats could really play...
and I really mean that...."
'Saw
|
28.179 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Counting the cars on the NJ Tpk... | Mon Jun 18 1990 14:35 | 3 |
| C'mon Frank, admit it, you were a Disco Boy.
JoJ
|
28.180 | | CAM::WAY | Terminate with extreme prejudice | Mon Jun 18 1990 15:08 | 14 |
| Not by a long shot, JoM!
You have to remember at that time I was heavily into music. It
occupied probably 80% of my day in school, and I got heavily into
many types of music, from medieval stuff right up through the most
far out avant garde stuff you can imagine.
Disco, musically speaking, had about as much substance as tissue
paper, so we just passed it off. We really were into much more
complex stuff, or blues...
Never did like disco, nope.
'Saw
|
28.181 | Guess he does have morals, Mike. (-: | CRBOSS::DERRY | LandOfTheFreeButOnlyIfYouAgree.... | Tue Jun 19 1990 06:03 | 3 |
| Clemens got slapped around last night....
Never got out of the second inning. 7 H, 6 R, 3 ER, 2 BB, 3 SO.
|
28.182 | She's a Brickhouse.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Diggin the lawn 6/20 w/ the TWOS | Tue Jun 19 1990 07:27 | 9 |
|
Must have been Phil Oneil's columun in the sunday Telegram Karen ;^)...
was the mound too high last night? perhaps he was getting squezzed?
Frank, cmon Disco was great. the music stunk but boy the heavy bass beat
used to get the women hot and the clubs were filled with em'' ;^)
mike
|
28.183 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Madonna and ASICS.. A WINNING COMBO | Tue Jun 19 1990 07:29 | 4 |
| mike,
me gots to ask.. 6/20 the lawn.. fill me in?
|
28.184 | | CAM::WAY | Terminate with extreme prejudice | Tue Jun 19 1990 07:45 | 23 |
| Well, Mike, we did make a distinction between what we called
Funk (stuff like Brick House by the Commodores and stuff by
Earth Wind & Fire) and pure Disco (Bee Gees, KC and the Sunshine
Band etc).
Funk was cool, especially if the band had horns. The Phoenix Horn Section
from Earth Wind and Fire was highly ranked by the brass majors I hung out
with, as was the Tower of Power Horn Section. Commodores were a hot
commodity.
"Cause she's a brick house, she's mighty mighty, jus' lettin' it all hang
out!"
As far as the Sox last night, Roger had an off night.
BTW, I heard Rich Gale (pitching coach of the New Britain Sox) talking
about really tall pitchers having an advantage based on angle of
delivery etc. It was quite informative. I guess if the pitcher
is tall enough, his delivery is so angled relative to the batter that
it's almost like trying to hit slow pitch softball.....
'Saw
|
28.185 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | IWishCathyIrelandWouldMoonMe! | Tue Jun 19 1990 07:47 | 1 |
| Funk? Frank go home and listen to Van Halen. You'll be ok.
|
28.186 | | CAM::WAY | Terminate with extreme prejudice | Tue Jun 19 1990 07:52 | 5 |
| Debil Dog -- I do that too! I just happen to have the *most*
eclectic tastes in music in the Western world.
'Saw
|
28.187 | | PARVAX::WARDLE | Counting the cars on the NJ Tpk... | Tue Jun 19 1990 08:00 | 5 |
| Frank, you really have to narrow your musical tastes. Funk is Junk.
Any of you guys see how much Frank sweats? Maybe that explains it.
JoJ
|
28.188 | | CAM::WAY | Terminate with extreme prejudice | Tue Jun 19 1990 08:29 | 9 |
| Like people, every musical genre has something to offer.
Open yourself to the music. Expand your stream of consciousness.
Eat some of Chainsaw's Magic Mushrooms, wait for the White Rabbit,
bring a towel in case you sweat, and let it be.
Chainsaw
|
28.189 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | The killer awoke before dawn... | Tue Jun 19 1990 09:38 | 11 |
|
> I just happen to have the *most*
> eclectic tastes in music in the Western world.
Hey 'Saw, have you been taping all 17 hours of VVagner's "Ring of
the Niebelungelubblelied" thisted week? It's simulcasted in stereo,
too. It's more filling, and it sounds great too. A better cure
for insomnia you won't find anywhere.
Dickster
|
28.190 | | CAM::WAY | Terminate with extreme prejudice | Tue Jun 19 1990 09:52 | 15 |
| Gee, I almost asked in that reply who'd seen Das Rheingold lasted night.
I haven't been taping it, but wished I'd known about it. The stories
that are being portrayed are based in some of the neatest mythology
known to man.
People don't know it, but Richard Wagner also wrote a pornographic
opera cycles called the Ring of the Niebelunglabia(tm), which is
very rarely performed...
It's hard to believe that the lush sounds of Wagner's orchestrations
were considered controversial in the world of late 19th century Romantic
music...
'Saw
|
28.191 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Mo Money, Mo Money, Mo Money | Tue Jun 19 1990 10:17 | 6 |
| 28.190� Gee, I almost asked in that reply who'd seen Das Rheingold lasted night.
Save the effort Frank. I can speak from experience and tell you it's
a lousy beer. Red White & Blue is better.
/Don
|
28.192 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | The killer awoke before dawn... | Tue Jun 19 1990 10:28 | 14 |
|
I switched to the opera lasted night after Rocket Roger was getting
the SLOF(tm) beat out of him. I can't say I could watch the whole
freakin' thing right up until the fat lady sings, but VVagner does
have some stirring overtures. "Die Valkeries(sp?)" always reminds
me of either the Bugs Bunny cartoon where Elmer Fudd sings "Kill
da Wabbit", or that Helicopter scene from the 'Nam movie (Apocolypse
Now (?).
And how come they sing, like, 68 bars of music in German, and the
subtitle on the bottom is only about three words?
Dicksterlungelieb
|
28.193 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Jun 19 1990 10:38 | 4 |
| /Don, now there's a beer, good 'ole Red White and Blue. Is it on
sale yet? Works better than Drano.
Lee
|
28.194 | Scares the **** out of 'em ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Send lawyers, guns, and money ... | Tue Jun 19 1990 10:55 | 7 |
| >> or that Helicopter scene from the 'Nam movie (Apocolypse Now (?).
"(Sniff, sniff) Ahhh, I love the smell of napalm in the morning."
- Robert Duvall as "Colonel Kilgore" in "Apocalypse Now"
Bob Hunt
|
28.195 | | CAM::WAY | Hell To Pay | Tue Jun 19 1990 11:04 | 19 |
| "Smells like victory"
The reason is that the German language has this tendency to make
works up out of small words. Ausgang, which means exit, is really
Out-way, or something like that.
At any rate, German can take up a lot more room than english. (YOu
should see the word for Factory Automation 8^)). Add to that the
fact that a lot of the libretto reads like poetry, and you get
the extra stuff.
I wish I had a good command of the language because then I wouldn't
need the subtitles.
The way Roger was pitching last night you've thought it was Twilight
of the Gods anyway....
'Saw
|
28.196 | Blues before and after | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | Takes 2 jerks 2 make 1 MVanilli. | Tue Jun 19 1990 13:29 | 10 |
| > was the mound too high last night? perhaps he was getting squezzed?
Well two or three starts ago, when he wasn't impressive, but got the
win anyway, he blamed it on the 150 pitches or so he threw 6 days
earlier. This mornings Globe said that the mound in the bullpen was
too low, and the one in the field was too high.
Maybe he's saving the squeeze for next time?
Dan
|
28.197 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Tue Jun 19 1990 13:46 | 5 |
| Dan, you master of misinformation, Roger did not say any of
those things. Pena did. Roger's only comment was that he pitched
poorly.
/Dom
|
28.198 | Misinform *this* | WNDMLL::SCHNEIDER | Takes 2 jerks 2 make 1 MVanilli. | Tue Jun 19 1990 14:07 | 8 |
| >This mornings Globe said that the mound in the bullpen was
>too low, and the one in the field was too high.
Hey /Don, cancha read??? What does the above say? No misinformation
there. BTW, this wasn't quoted from Pena either. It was obviously fed
to the writer. One can only wonder why...
Dan
|
28.199 | Who wants to kick the dirt, next? | BUILD::MORGAN | | Tue Jun 19 1990 15:15 | 10 |
| >Well two or three starts ago, when he wasn't impressive, but got the
^^^^ ^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
>win anyway, he blamed it on the 150 pitches or so he threw 6 days
Dan, either your information or memory is bogus. Not counting last
night, Clemens' ERA in his last 3 starts was 1.96. The game you're
talking about, he gave up two runs. What a shitbum, huh?
Steve
|
28.200 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Wed Jun 20 1990 07:04 | 6 |
| RE: Dan
I'm rubber and you're glue.
Everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
/Don
|
28.201 | | CAM::WAY | Hell to Pay | Wed Jun 20 1990 07:15 | 23 |
| Yes folks, it'll be here soon....
The all new, all improved, all VHS (we got rid of Beta)
/Don Schoolyard Rhymes, Rivalries and Retorts Video.
In this video, /Don examines that time in our lives when our lack
of inhibitions caused us to be quicker on our feet, quicker with
our fists, and quicker with our wits.
/Don expounds in detail upon the art of the retort, covering in
large part that body of knowledge known as schoolboy illogic.
He also calls in his expert partner Dinsdale to show the latest
pugilistic techniques to help you in your own fisticuffs. Never mind
what Tyson's doing, ask /Don the expert...
Call, now, and we'll send you free of charge, the informational booklet,
"Schoolyard Scoring - or How to Make it With Beautiful Women!"
Call 1-800-YOR-MAMA
|
28.202 | Sox Travel Coach | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Jun 20 1990 07:21 | 23 |
| Latest flap from the Red Sox camp has to do with players being upset
with the travel arrangements the team has set up. Seems that the
team got hung up at BWI airport after the Orioles game by Customs.
The Toronto airport closes at 11:00 so they had to fly into Hamilton
and then take a 50 minute bus ride. Team didn't get into their hotel
rooms until 4:30 AM yesterday morning. Clemens and Evans walked
off the plane in Baltimore, spent the night there and flew to Toronto
yesterday afternoon.
Seems travel was one of the complaints Clemens presented to management
two years ago. Tony Pena said the Red Sox travel arrangements are
the worst he's seen. One player claimed that if the Sox don't clean
up their act on travel, Clemens and Brunansky will leave the team
when their contracts expire simply for that reason. Kutcher and
Greenwell were also outspoken about this.
What exactly is wrong with the Sox travel arrangements? My first
reaction was "Here go the whiners and belly-achers again" but when
Pena said this was the worst he's seen, I'm thinking perhaps there's
more here than meets the eye.
Rich
|
28.203 | cheapskate shoestring owners = lousy travel arrangements | CNTROL::CHILDS | Diggin the lawn 6/20 w/ the TWOS | Wed Jun 20 1990 07:23 | 0 |
28.204 | Gotta bitch about something, I guess | SNDCSL::HAUSRATH | Too many projects, not enough time | Wed Jun 20 1990 07:49 | 7 |
|
I don't care how bad the travel arrangments are, when you're making the
kind of money these guys do, I really don't think they should complain.
I didn't think these issues surfaced when a team was winning!
Oh, that's right, it's the Red Sox!
|
28.205 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Wed Jun 20 1990 11:12 | 10 |
| The players really don't have any right to complain on this one.
Yes, they charter. In most cases, it's not a problem. I believe,
however, there is some sort of flight restriction going into Toronto
at night. There is also a time problem in clearing Customs.
The only alternative would have been to stay in Baltimore an extra
night and fly up Tuesday morning. Would have probably taken just
as long at Customs but would have avoided the bus ride.
John
|
28.206 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Jun 20 1990 11:26 | 5 |
| Yes, but why is Pena saying the Sox travel arrangements are the
worst he's seen?
Rich
|
28.207 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Wed Jun 20 1990 11:36 | 3 |
| Maybe Rico Petrocelli got the team banned from some of the
airlines.
/Don
|
28.208 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Wed Jun 20 1990 11:59 | 17 |
| It could be the hotels, there may have been problems with buses
meeting teams at the planes, it could be the baggage handling, it
could be the flight times, it could be any number of things. Some
of these things are in the control of the team, some are not.
In defense of Jack Rogers (Red Sox Travelling Secretary) team travel
is a pain in the neck no matter what level it's on. You are dealing
with a very fussy clientele and you want things to go perfectly,
no matter what.
In defense of the players, when you fly as often as they do and
at such odd hours as they do, little things are very important and
what may seem to be a minor annoyance to us becomes a big annoyance
to them. They work under an awful lot of pressure and it's especially
difficult after a loss. I'm not trying to excuse misbehavior, either.
John
|
28.210 | | CAM::WAY | I got a black cat bone, gotta mojo too... | Wed Jun 20 1990 13:17 | 23 |
28.211 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Wed Jun 20 1990 13:34 | 50 |
| One area where the Red Sox could be criticized is for not sitting
down with the players before the season and saying, "we have a charter
going from Baltimore to Toronto after the game. As you know, flying
into Toronto is a pain in the neck because we have to go through
customs, we have no idea how long it will take, if we complain we'll
get held in Baltimore for 24 hours, we have to fly into Hamilton
because Toronto's airport closes at 11 and that's an extra hour
bus ride." Communicating the source of the problem no matter how
many times the guys may have heard it before at least covers the
team.
Travelling with the Patriots gives me some perspective on the problem.
The team has to arrange for a charter flight from Boston or Providence
to city X. The team has to arrange for buses to bring the team
to the airport and a truck to bring the team's equipment. If it's
a two week trip, then the truck also has to handle the personal
luggage from everyone in the travel party. The team gets a special
menu on the plane. The buses and the equipment truck not only have
to be able to get to the plane at whatever airport the team is flying
out of but they damn well better be waiting at the other end. Hotel
rooms, meeting rooms and meals have to be arranged at the hotel
at whatever city the team is playing in. The personal luggage has
to be there (with any sport, the preliminary arrangements must be
made far in advance and with football, someone goes out in advance
of the team (2-3 days), part of his job is to make sure everything
is OK on that end, have room keys ready, clear the way at the airport
and so forth). Buses have to be ready at the right time to get
the team to the stadium. After the game, they have to get the team
and the gear onto the transportation, get to the airport, onto the
plane and back home. Everyone is tired and wound up at the same
time and pissed off if they lost.
Someone from the airline travels with the team and the hotel and
bus people bend over backwards to make sure this all goes well.
Continental handled the Patriots flight needs last year for the
first time and I was impressed with just how eager they were to
please on the trip I took with the team. The person who is in charge
of the travel is responsible, but a lot of what he's responsible
for is in the hands of someone else and no matter how prepared he
is, no matter how many times he checks, something is going to go
wrong and he is going to get blamed.
In baseball, the players get meal money rather than having big team
meals, and there's always personal luggage to contend with. Baseball
teams tend to fly at more odd hours than football teams and I think
baseball players are much less gentlemanly. I've travelled with
the Patriots on 3 road trips and have never seen them give anyone
a hard time.
John
|
28.212 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Wed Jun 20 1990 16:47 | 2 |
| What's wif all the 'hidden' notes? Is Crunchster back?!!
Denny
|
28.213 | Tsk, tsk, tsk :^> | WFOV11::MORRISON | A Haney physique...Mr Haney | Thu Jun 21 1990 07:46 | 5 |
|
Frank, you naughty boy!! You musta said a no-no.
Bull~
|
28.214 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Thong salesmen are crack dealers | Thu Jun 21 1990 12:33 | 29 |
|
Are these Sox predictable or what? A chance to move into first
place lasted night, and "when the going gets tough, the tough get
going--in reverse."
Pinning their hopes on future Hall-of-Famer Wes Gardner (1-4 record,
ERA left out intentionally to preserve disk space), the loyal Sox
fans went scurrying for the "Fold File" before the evening was through.
Next victim, Jeff Gray, who had turned grey by the time he finished
his embarrassment, went 1 1/3 innings, giving up 3 runs on three
hits.
Then came fireballer Tom Bolton, who turned into "Furballer" Tom
Bolton, and choked most heinously while coughing up 1 inning of
6-hit, 5-run ball.
Does anyone out there know anyone who can throw a ball 60' 6" (in
the air, that is), and looks good in tight baseball pants? I know
where we might be able to get him (or her) a cushy job for $600K
per year.
By the way, I read that Toronto had some kind of broken water main
problem in and around Skydome lasted night. Those baffroom olympics
must have been wicked awesome!
Dickster
|
28.215 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Thu Jun 21 1990 13:26 | 24 |
| Hey Dickster, what's your problem? Wes Gardner's ERA is 6.28. Better
than the +7.** of a certain Yankee starter.
And Jeff Gray is a closer. He retired the first 4 batters he faced.
Bolton is another story, in my opinion, and deserves to be lambasted.
The Sox are not expecting great things from Gardner. But he got
the Sox into the 6th inning only down by 3 runs. Against what many
people feel is the 2nd best team in the American League, this ain't
as bad as you make it seem.
Gray is a 1 inning pitcher. He has said it and Fischer says it.
Perhaps Morgan deserves some heat for leaving him in. To be honest
I expected Lamp to come in.
But I am looking on the bright side. The Sox went to New York,
baltimore and Toronto and were trailing by 1 1/2 games when they
left. They come home with a 5-4 record and are out by 2 games. They
split an away series with the Jays. Nobody said the Sox are the
class of the East. I think they are doing better than many expected.
As are the Tigers.
Rich
|
28.216 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Madonna and ASICS.. A WINNING COMBO | Thu Jun 21 1990 13:54 | 2 |
| brrrrr.. cold in here :)
|
28.217 | Bolton saves the day! Film in the can | AKOV06::DCARR | Jordan Rules! (thx Chuck!) | Thu Jun 21 1990 14:46 | 10 |
| Ya wanna know the funniest? The Barely Heard this morning reported
that Bolton came in and "saved the bullpen".... Now, I'm optomistic,
but even _I_ couldn't write that wiffout gaggin'.
Speaking of baffroom Olympics, I'll be there tomorrow night with about
20 friends (hold yer keyboard, Nazz :-), and I'm sure we'll consume the
minimum required for entry into the 100 yd crawl... but excatly which
baffroom is it, and when are the post times?
ML
|
28.218 | WHAT DO THE SOX SEE IN TOM BOLTON | ROULET::GARRY | Cowboys in 91 | Fri Jun 22 1990 00:00 | 12 |
| Can someone please tell me what Tom Bolton is doing with the Sox,
this guy has great credentials in the minors and has NEVER,I repeat
NEVER shown that he can get a major leaguer out when it counts,how
is he still in the Boston organization after all his piss poor
appearances,I don't care if he strikes out 100 guys in a row at
Pawtucket but everytime they say he's ready he's like kerosene on
a fire.....he's USELESS.He must have knee pads that don't wear out
or something because he's certainly not here with his so called
pitching talent.
Tom
|
28.219 | 8^) | CAM::WAY | Could Mighty Mouse take Superman? | Fri Jun 22 1990 07:55 | 1 |
| HE IS NO TWO BLAM U OUR
|
28.220 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Fri Jun 22 1990 08:00 | 19 |
| First off Bolton is a lefty. Lefties tend to get more attention
and are forgiven more frequently than righties.
Secondly, when Dopson went down for good, Morgan called Pawtucket
and asked them what they had for pitching. He was told that Bolton
was the best they had.
Like you said, a successful AAA pitcher is not necessarily a good
major leaguer (witness Jeff Gray as a closer or Dana Kiecker) but
you have to go with what your minor league manager says sometimes.
Seems as though the best prospects the Sox have are not in Pawtucket
but at New Britain. I would expect a few of the AA Sox to get a
long look see next year at spring training and perhaps 1 will come
north with the big team. One or two others will probably end up
with Pawtucket with guys like Liester getting their walking papers.
Rich
|
28.221 | | MILKWY::SLABOUNTY | Erotic Nightmares | Fri Jun 22 1990 09:19 | 9 |
|
Does anyone know what happened to the RED_SOX conference?
Is it still on HARBOR? I'm getting "File not found".
Thanks for any info.
GTI
|
28.222 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | If you can't be good.....have fun! | Fri Jun 22 1990 09:22 | 1 |
| Try SHPLOG::RED_SOX
|
28.223 | same problem | EARRTH::GROVES | | Fri Jun 22 1990 09:25 | 3 |
| re: -1
Just tried SHPLOG::RED_SOX and got "File Not Found"
|
28.224 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | If you can't be good.....have fun! | Fri Jun 22 1990 09:27 | 2 |
| Sorry, it was working on a couple of days ago when I last checked,
maybe someone else knows something.....
|
28.225 | Info on Sox Conference | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Fri Jun 22 1990 10:09 | 13 |
| <<< ASABET::ASAB11:[NOTES$LIBRARY]BASEBALL.NOTE;2 >>>
-< BASEBALL >-
================================================================================
Note 27.221 The Boston Red Sox note 221 of 225
VAXWRK::NEEDLE "Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!"" 6 lines 21-JUN-1990 10:55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The satellite that houses the RED_SOX notes file went away according to Bill
Jackson (HARBOR::). The file is in the process of moving.
I'll let you know when it's back if Bill lets me know.
j.
|
28.226 | See note 136 in ASABET::BASEBALL for further info. | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Fri Jun 22 1990 13:24 | 0 |
28.227 | Sox sweep O's... | CRBOSS::DERRY | LandOfTheFreeButOnlyIfYouAgree.... | Mon Jun 25 1990 06:05 | 1 |
|
|
28.228 | Sox Sad Slump Continues. Slip To Second In Standings. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Tue Jul 17 1990 09:09 | 1 |
|
|
28.229 | Or did you mean "sipped" | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Gimme a warm woman and a cold beer | Tue Jul 17 1990 09:25 | 7 |
|
> -< Sox Sad Slump Continues. Slip To Second In Standings. >-
Right. And the Hindenburg just "slipped" off its moorings.
Dickster
|
28.230 | Dickster's Dastardly Diabribes Demean DeadSox | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Tue Jul 17 1990 09:45 | 1 |
|
|
28.231 | Slashers silly snippets sip strained swampwater succulently | 15436::LEFEBVRE | She had one long pair of eyes | Tue Jul 17 1990 11:00 | 2 |
|
|
28.232 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The Morgan Goodwill Games... | Tue Jul 17 1990 11:05 | 3 |
| What did Marty Barrett say?
JD
|
28.233 | Weinie's wise wemarks wot | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | YanksInLast-/DonDrinksFree | Tue Jul 17 1990 11:07 | 1 |
|
|
28.234 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | YanksInLast-/DonDrinksFree | Tue Jul 17 1990 11:17 | 6 |
| RE: JD
Marty was moaning about Morgan's Barrett benching. Incredulously
crying foul and favoritism.
/Don
|
28.235 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Jul 17 1990 12:02 | 14 |
| He said he felt and many other players allegedly agree with him that
the Sox strongest lineup had him at second and Reed at short. He said
also that Reed felt he should be playing second rather than
flip-flopping positions and that if management felt Reed should
flip-flop, Reed should do what's best for the team. Reed said he never
said he wouldn't play shortstop but did say he'd prefer to play only
one position. Reading between the lines of Barrett's quotes, it seemed
like he was unwilling to accept there is a difference between
management and labor.
That sort of sums it up. More current discussion in the Red Sox notes
conference.
John
|
28.236 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | sox fading.. and fast | Wed Jul 18 1990 12:55 | 6 |
| clemens + tired arm= no 20 game season
film a t 11
|
28.237 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Gimme a warm woman and a cold beer | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:10 | 11 |
|
'Bout time we're back on line.
Red Sox haven't won a World Series since 1918, but *NO* team, until
the Sox did it last night, has *ever* hit into two triple plays
in one game.
Way to go Sox!! Congrats!! You make my pants swell with pride!!
Dickster
|
28.238 | | BSS::RIGGEN | Co Sports teams= Bridesmaids | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:15 | 4 |
| Sorry bout the down time (complain to the Customer Svc's group)
Couldn't get my TU81 fixed.
Jeff
|
28.239 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | I get so excitable | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:16 | 10 |
| Dinz,
Why don't ya quit pickin' on poor Roger for 1 minute.
The last few games the Sox were merely emulating the Yanks
but finally, some desperate fan gave them some smelling salts
and woke 'em up. The results were clearly evident in last
nights game..................
Wheel
|
28.240 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | sox fading.. and fast | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:24 | 5 |
| yea right 1-0.. big run support, wheel, be nice to me, i am going
through a crisis, my daughters voice is changing!!!!!!!!
shitttttttttttttttt
|
28.241 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Wanted: Man in velcro pants! | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:30 | 3 |
| Be nice to you?
NEVER!!!!
|
28.242 | ha ha DInz! :-) | SASE::SZABO | The Blues kicked me in the head | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:33 | 1 |
|
|
28.243 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Gimme a warm woman and a cold beer | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:34 | 10 |
|
> Sorry bout the down time (complain to the Customer Svc's group)
No reason to apologize. Youse moderators and technoweenies and
other techno-support guys and gals have my utmost respect and support.
I'm swelling with pride over you too.
Dickster
|
28.244 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Gimme a warm woman and a cold beer | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:39 | 8 |
|
>>< Note 28.241 by WMOIS::JBARROWS "Wanted: Man in velcro pants!" >
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
See Lufay. I think velour pants come with velcro.
Dickster
|
28.245 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Wanted: Man in velcro pants! | Wed Jul 18 1990 13:43 | 5 |
| Nah, velour and velcro don't stick together.......
Thanks for da help!!!
Wheel
|
28.246 | Hey Dinz, you wouldn't want to wager on Roger winning 20? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:01 | 1 |
|
|
28.247 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Wanted: Man in velcro pants! | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:04 | 5 |
| You think he's gonna put his money where his mouth is????
ya know Dinz, ya can't back down from a dare, its not a *manly*
thing to do.....
|
28.248 | put your spokes back on WHEEL | COBRA::DINSMORE | sox fading.. and fast | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:06 | 1 |
|
|
28.249 | | CAM::WAY | and I didn't draw the card I needed | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:24 | 7 |
| Dinz, just remember, the better part of valor is discretion.
And Dickster, you'd better put some ice on that wang, er, thang of
yours to keep the swelling down. Even swelling wif pride can
be dangerous if it swells too much!
'Saw
|
28.250 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Wanted: Man in velcro pants! | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:33 | 2 |
| Yeah, if it swells too much it'll pop and there won't be anything
left!!!!!
|
28.251 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:36 | 4 |
| 5-4-3, 5-4-3 double triple. I wonder if anyone will play those
numbers in some twin-trifecta action tonight?
/Don
|
28.252 | | CAM::WAY | and I didn't draw the card I needed | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:42 | 9 |
| � numbers in some twin-trifecta action tonight?
I could get into a little twin action tonight. Couple of Swedish
twins would be nice... Oh, oh, you said trifecta..... must be
meaning a little Spanish flavor there, eh Slasher?
I'm outta here....
'Saw
|
28.253 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | sox fading.. and fast | Wed Jul 18 1990 14:50 | 3 |
|
tplay the 6-9 quinela frankwa
|
28.254 | Sizzling Sox Surge in Standings | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Thu Jul 19 1990 06:36 | 1 |
|
|
28.255 | awesome hitting machine red sox luck out | COBRA::DINSMORE | the Sex Trigger gene.. | Thu Jul 19 1990 06:47 | 1 |
|
|
28.256 | Record setting Red Sox Roolll! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Thu Jul 19 1990 07:05 | 1 |
|
|
28.257 | | CAM::WAY | For I intend to go in harm's way | Thu Jul 19 1990 08:05 | 1 |
| Yankees mired in Steinbrenner's Scandal...
|
28.258 | Parade pin Poctober | HILLST::BENCH | George Keverian for Ultra-Thick-Fast | Thu Jul 19 1990 08:07 | 7 |
| Battling Bosox bounce back by Bluejays by beating Bi-guys� bigtime behind
Bolton,Boggs...
Yanks - yuck!
� bi-guys :== Twins
|
28.259 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | the Sex Trigger gene.. | Tue Jul 24 1990 06:42 | 13 |
| Knudson missed the extra point last night in the sox game.. it went wide
left... 13-0.. boddicker is coming back to earth after a strong
start, A deal for Scott is close but they want Naering.
Mac,
whats wrong with this team??
dinz
|
28.260 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Too much is never enough | Tue Jul 24 1990 07:04 | 6 |
| What's wrong with the Sox???
THEY GOT YANKEE-ITIS!!!!!!!!!
Wheel
|
28.261 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | the Sex Trigger gene.. | Tue Jul 24 1990 07:16 | 7 |
| THEY WILL BE IN 4TH, WHENS THE SEASONS OVER...
meaning the red_sox
dinz
|
28.262 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Jul 24 1990 08:54 | 6 |
| It's too early to write them off entirely, but if Boddicker doesn't
regain his first half form pretty soon the Sox are toast. This
morning's Globe reports that Mike has a 7.36 ERA since July 7th.
py
|
28.263 | snubbed for a good reason | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:10 | 9 |
|
> It's too early to write them off entirely, but if Boddicker doesn't
> regain his first half form pretty soon the Sox are toast. This
> morning's Globe reports that Mike has a 7.36 ERA since July 7th.
Proves Tony Larussa was right....
mike
|
28.264 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | the Sex Trigger gene.. | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:12 | 2 |
| they cant seem to hit either..... must be the moon in leo...
|
28.265 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Too much is never enough | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:25 | 9 |
| o The Sox are merely losing all the games now at this point of the
season so when they make it to the World Series, they'll win.
o Wait till Dewey gets back....
And Dinz, if its the moon in Leo what is it with the Yanks, the year
in 1990??????? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha (tm)
Wheel
|
28.266 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | the Sex Trigger gene.. | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:36 | 2 |
| set marker 28.265 ha
|
28.267 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Too much is never enough | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:43 | 11 |
| Well if ya think I am a dreamer listen to this comment made by my
mother last night:
'Wouldn't it be nice if the Red Sox, Celtics, Patriots (she's really
joking on this one) and Bruins all won this year?'
Maybe I should have put this in the Sports Joke Topic????
BTW, Sox are gonna take off soon, TRUST ME!
Wheel
|
28.268 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | the Sex Trigger gene.. | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:51 | 6 |
|
ya, they are taking off on that plane that will lead them into 4th
place....
|
28.269 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Too much is never enough | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:58 | 4 |
| okay, okay arguing with you is a moot point, even if da Sox finish
fourth (which they won't) at least it is better than LAST! HA!
Wheel
|
28.270 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | the Sex Trigger gene.. | Tue Jul 24 1990 09:59 | 3 |
|
whos arguing, i just happen to disagree with ya wheel kid..
|
28.271 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Too much is never enough | Tue Jul 24 1990 10:02 | 8 |
| Okay OLD man Dinz!!!!! hahaha
Sox are gonna come alive, I'm tellin' ya now......wait and see!
Saw Dewey lasted night on da news and he's starting to practice.
Better start putting your money away for that case you owe /Don!
Wheel
|
28.272 | Another Clemens victory? | CSC32::P_PAPACEK | | Wed Jul 25 1990 16:08 | 4 |
|
Anybody got a score on this afternoon's game vs the Brewers?
|
28.273 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Wed Jul 25 1990 17:38 | 3 |
| Sox 2 Brewers 0, Clemens complete game, 9 Ks, 1 BB, 3 hits.
John
|
28.274 | Sox REAL Problem | 37141::PSHAFER | Vulture Capitalist | Wed Jul 25 1990 22:57 | 6 |
| Wheel,
The Sox only problem is that they are in the same division as the
Orioles and Blue Jays.
PaulaSue
|
28.275 | I can't believe they're in 1st! | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Thu Jul 26 1990 08:05 | 7 |
| How can a team lose 15 out of 21 games and be tied for 1st place!!??
John
|
28.276 | What a stiff huh? | SALEM::DODA | Gonna be a dad! | Thu Jul 26 1990 08:55 | 7 |
|
Clemens is a bum.
Right Dinz?
daryll
|
28.277 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Jul 26 1990 09:00 | 9 |
| re Daryll, personal name:
You too? Congrats! Alison and I just found out a couple days ago
that we'll be parents for the first time in the spring (probably around
Opening Day next year).
Best of luck,
Paul
|
28.278 | psst! | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Your time is gonna come | Thu Jul 26 1990 09:06 | 4 |
| Somebody want to ask Dinz what Clemens record would be if the Red
Sox had a closer?
Mark.
|
28.279 | Due Jan 25th! | SALEM::DODA | Gonna be a dad! | Thu Jul 26 1990 09:07 | 0 |
28.280 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Your time is gonna come | Thu Jul 26 1990 09:09 | 3 |
| Hey Daryll, how 'bout dat Mike Boddicker!
Mark.
|
28.281 | How about that Chris James? | SALEM::DODA | Gonna be a dad! | Thu Jul 26 1990 09:17 | 3 |
| Still gotta go some to get into Allan Anderson territory...
daryll
|
28.282 | probably 8 or 9 losses by now for Mr. Crybaby | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Thu Jul 26 1990 09:54 | 10 |
|
> Somebody want to ask Dinz what Clemens record would be if the Red
> Sox had a closer?
Mark.
Or what it would be if Dinz had left well enough alone? ;^)
mike
|
28.283 | My sage advice to you potential Dads.... | CAM::WAY | Shot down, in a blaze of glory | Thu Jul 26 1990 10:11 | 30 |
| Hey, all you Dads-to-be...
Congratulations. I guess there weren't any (closed) flies on you!
But, gentlemen, remember. Your part of the deal only took a couple
of minutes. Your lady's part of the deal will take considerably
longer, and will get her more testy than you could ever imagine.
So, on those evenings when you come home and she greets you at the
door with a butcher knife and that Charles Manson look in her
eyes, demanding Ben 'n Jerry's Heathbar Crunch something in Vlasic
Pickles and topped with peanut butter, just go out and get her some.
Keep in mind the little bundle of joy that will be arriving, and
that will make you smile.
Also, pick a good name for the kid. Names like Dewdrop, Leaf, Autumn,
Star, are so dweeby now. If it's a boy, make sure the name is
a manly one. Something like Joe, Mack, Bubba, or Biff is gonna strike
fear in the hearts of the other kids when he gets to be in 3rd grade.
Finally, don't forget to teach your kid about the important things
in life: good nutrition, good beer, good sportsmanship, respect,
love, safe sex, Jack Daniels, and about never, never putting coat
hangers into live electrical outlets.
Hope this has shlepped,
Chainsaw (who hasn't had any, and probably wont' for a while....)
|
28.284 | Knuckles is a good name, too! | 4159::NAZZARO | Underneath the strobe light | Thu Jul 26 1990 12:37 | 10 |
| Saw -
Your manly names were good, but I'm partial to Vito, Nunzio, Guido,
etc, you know, those fine ethnic names that are not an indication
of any particular nationality but project a certain "if you don't
give me your lunch money I'll make you throw up quicker than you
thought humanly possible" kind of image that will hold your child
in good company for his formative years.
NAZZ
|
28.285 | | MSBVLS::REPRO | | Fri Jul 27 1990 07:45 | 3 |
| clemens is a average picture, i have to agree with Dinz
|
28.286 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Your time is gonna come | Fri Jul 27 1990 08:08 | 10 |
| < Note 28.285 by MSBVLS::REPRO >
> clemens is a average picture, i have to agree with Dinz
He might be a_average picture, but he's a superlative 8x10 glossy.
HTH,
Mark.
|
28.287 | Caint fool me Dinswad. | JACKAL::DIGGINS | Me and Elvis went to McDonald's | Fri Jul 27 1990 12:15 | 7 |
|
Dinz u using Ruthies account? You bumski!
Steve_who_knows_better
|
28.288 | No wonder players pack up and move ... | FRSBEE::BROOKS | I could drop Tyson like a bad habit! | Fri Jul 27 1990 19:00 | 8 |
| And after Clemens great performance, what dominated the sports page of
the Hearld ?
You got it, a petulant bashing session by some writer who was p.o.ed
that Roger didn't inform the press that he wouldn't hold forth and kiss
their a** .....
Just another reason to despise the Boston media.
|
28.289 | | REFINE::ASHE | WouldUwalkONyourLIPSthruBUSTEDglass? | Sat Jul 28 1990 11:02 | 1 |
| Who did they give up for Marshall?
|
28.290 | Only in the AL East. | CRBOSS::DERRY | Cooler than a Fridgidaire... | Mon Jul 30 1990 05:52 | 4 |
| Sox go 4-8 on this road trip and find themselves only a game back.
Unreal.
|
28.291 | No one want's it. | JOULE::DIGGINS | Me and Elvis went to McDonald's | Mon Jul 30 1990 07:27 | 8 |
|
I think they picked Marshall up for nada. Not sure tho'.
The Herald is a rag. Is the AL East still the AL least?
Steve
|
28.292 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Mon Jul 30 1990 11:24 | 21 |
|
They gave up two or three minor leaguers for Marshall. Why? He's always
been hurt. They certainly can't take Qunitana out of the lineup at first.
Maybe they can play him in right but they just traded for Brunasky to that
and if they DH him what's Evans going to say? The Soap Opera continue...
Worcester writer Phil Oneil has suggest that trade Clemens now before they
loose him. Makes sense to me. IMO the writers have a right to be pissed
off at Roger. They wait an hour for him and then he sends word down that he
isn't going to talk to them anyways. He could hace told them that in the
first five minutes after the ballgame and all because the week before they
report about him getting elbowed iced after two week before he's complaining
about a heavy arm? The guy is a first class jerk and probably the biggest
crybaby to ever play in Boston and that's saying a lot.....
for the record Boggs is hitting 291 ;^)....
Mac thanks for Gooden comments a while back, he's won 8 straight since
then.... ;^)
mike
|
28.293 | | LUDWIG::GARRY | Cowboys in 91 | Mon Jul 30 1990 11:34 | 7 |
| RE. -1 Clemens
Mike and you'd still love to have him on your beloved Indians.
Tom
|
28.294 | New AL record | CIM::BROWN | | Mon Jul 30 1990 12:08 | 7 |
|
Sox blast Tiger pitching for 18 hits including a new record 12
doubles. Broke the old Tiger record of 11 doubles in a game.
Sox and Tigers split the series 2 - 2.
\pjb
|
28.295 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Mon Jul 30 1990 12:13 | 7 |
|
Tom, you couldn't be more wrong. I'd rather have a team that gets along
than pampered, whinny stars who still loose. Of course I'm not an owner
trying to make bucks. If the Indians or Mets traded for Clemens, I'd root
for other teams....
mike
|
28.296 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Mon Jul 30 1990 12:36 | 10 |
| I thought everyone knew that Roger wasn't talking to the press
anymore. Why did a reporter wait around for an hour?
� Tom, you couldn't be more wrong. I'd rather have a team that gets along
� than pampered, whinny stars who still loose.
With Darryl Strawberry in the outfield, how do you manage to be a Mets'
fan? And as far as "still loose", since Clemens arrived the Sox have 2
division titles and a pennant. Add to that a few All Star team
selections, an MVP, and 2 Cy Youngs.
|
28.297 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Jul 30 1990 12:49 | 3 |
|
Don't trade Clemens... please... I'd rather see the Sox lose him
to free agency for a 1st round draft pick.
|
28.298 | back at ya | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Mon Jul 30 1990 13:45 | 32 |
|
> I thought everyone knew that Roger wasn't talking to the press
> anymore. Why did a reporter wait around for an hour?
week to week thing up here Mac. If he wins and he's in a good mood he talks.
if he looses forget it. if they print something bad about him forget it.
> With Darryl Strawberry in the outfield, how do you manage to be a Mets'
> fan?
Well Darryl has had his mouments they seem to be few and far between now that
Davey is gone. Also I guess the fact that I don't read a lot of NY newspapers
or hear NY sportsnews I may miss the day to day trials and trivulations
of Darryl so I'm able to remain a fan. Here everyday it seems like King Roger
has something else to say, some new ax to grind or some new excuse for his
performance. Also again I'm not the owner if I was I trade Darryl.
> And as far as "still loose", since Clemens arrived the Sox have 2
> division titles and a pennant. Add to that a few All Star team
> selections, an MVP, and 2 Cy Youngs.
Nice indivdual awards there but it seems to me that their two division titles
and pennant were won inspite of Roger and not because of him. His best years
they did squittly. Last year during the pennant race of August he was lost in
a six game loosing streak if I remember correctly. He certainly did well
against the A's last year in the league championship series didn't he?
What's his post season record?
mike
|
28.299 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Mon Jul 30 1990 14:10 | 6 |
| Sox won the pennant in spite of Roger Clemens? What in the world were
all of those sportswriters thinking of when they voted him the MVP that
year?
And to those who still contend that Roger can't pitch in the clutch, I
ask that you look at the Rocket's record after a Sox loss.
|
28.300 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | RubItUp/FlipIt/SlapItDown/OhNoooo! | Mon Jul 30 1990 14:44 | 19 |
| re .297
Gronowski, you're mad because Swindell is sipping gallons of pond-scum
this year ....
re Roger,
The media makes him The King, and last time I looked, all a player is
paid to do is play. Period. Not put up with small-minded, petualnt,
ego-tripping idiots who when *THEY* decide to have a temper tantrum,
trash you over the papers for years.
They ran Steve Carlton into seclusion, George Hendrick as well. I'd
like to see some of these noters take the Boston media's garbage as
well.
Given the long list of Boston players who have had bellicose relations
with writers, I have to believe that the players are not most of the
problem, IMO.
|
28.301 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Jul 30 1990 15:04 | 9 |
|
The Indians have not lost in Swindell's last 9 starts... he's gone
4-0 or 5-0 with a bunch of no decision's and a 2.7? ERA... he
might sip... but he doesn't guzzle like the Astros or any other
teams you might currently be riding on...
Get a life pal... you told me you were going to destroy me in a
rotis league this year... what's your excuse?
|
28.302 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A Zorro snap in the Z formation! | Mon Jul 30 1990 15:22 | 14 |
| Big Mac,
IMO, Clemens winnig the MVP was a joke, and he won it for the noteriety
of 'no one has ever done it before'. And, in the World Series
when they needed him, he sipped, and he did in the champeenship
series. Roger is a great individual, but he'll never be a team
leader or a team player. Because of that, the only way Rogerwill
ever get a champeenship ring is if he goes to a team and is carried
along by real team players.
He's a great pitcher, but IMO, he's one of the most, if not THE
most, overrated player in baseball.
jD
|
28.303 | another brainedwashed Roggerette | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Mon Jul 30 1990 15:36 | 12 |
|
Mac, if the team is 30 games out and Clemems wins after a loosing streak
how in the world does prove he can pitch in the clutch? Now I know the
Soxs haven't been 30 out for a long time but I think you can see my point.
I think JD stated the MVP pretty well as for my own belief, I don't care if
a pitcher goes 30-3 with 340 strikeouts there is no how no way he deserves
to be MVP when he doesn't play everyday or in this case even bat. Even if
an NL pitcher had that kind of record and even hit a few game winners for
himself, I'd have hard time buying it....
mike
|
28.304 | | SALEM::DODA | Capone,Floyd,MassPoliticians | Tue Jul 31 1990 08:20 | 5 |
| Clemens shuts out Chisox. Sox win 3-0 and keep pace with Jays.
Clemens unscored upon in 23 consecutive innings.
daryll
|
28.305 | I guess i got a KOD too... | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Tue Jul 31 1990 08:23 | 4 |
|
Anyone still doubt the power of the KOD? ;^)....
mike
|
28.306 | The workhorse | BUILD::MORGAN | | Tue Jul 31 1990 08:32 | 13 |
| The bum threw another shutout last night, making it 23 consecutive
scoreless innings. I agree with DrM. The Boston press is worse than a
tub full of piranhas.
Mike C. - would you say Ted Williams was a bum too? He was labelled
a head case himself by the Boston media.
Personally, I'd just as soon see Clemens pull a Steve Carlton. I don't
care if he says another word, as long as he gets along with his teammates,
and continues to pitch the way he has for the past five years.
Steve
|
28.307 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Tue Jul 31 1990 08:48 | 27 |
|
> Mike C. - would you say Ted Williams was a bum too? He was labelled
> a head case himself by the Boston media.
Tough for me to say Steve because I wasn't quite old enough to read all
about the on goings of ted Williams during his time. While I agree the
boston press isn't the greatest and loves to attack I still think Clemens
has brought alot of it on himself.
One day he talks then he doesn't and it's always related to his pitching
effort.
The main reasons I consider him a bum are these, if and when he looses he
always has an excuse and has gone as low as to blame his teamates at time.
He blasted managment (sure they deserve it) but they do bend over backwards
for him. He blasts the city but most of all my biggest beef is have you
ever seen this guy do any charity work around here? Anything for the kids
who idolize him?
I just don't happen to believe he is the best pitcher in baseball either
for which I take most of this crap.
Ted Williams may have been a headcase but I don't believe he was wishy washy
with his dealing with the press and atleast he has return something to the
community....
mike
|
28.308 | | TOPDWN::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Tue Jul 31 1990 08:49 | 23 |
|
I don't think that a dominant year by a pitcher is, by itself enough to warrant
consideration for the mvp. However, when a pitcher has a dominant year and leads
his team to the series I think they should get MVP consideration.
Clemens did nothing else but lead the Sox to the series in '86. Especially
when he was coming off major surgery and not expected to do much.
IMHO...I don't care whether Clemens ever talks to the media again. All I want to
see is him on the mound every 5th day and in a Sox uniform for the rest of his
career. IMNSHO he should be the top payed pitcher in baseball and amongst the
top payed players in the game. Granted he didn't have a great series in '86 but
his contributions over his career in a hitters park mark him as one of the
best in the game.
Fortunately the pitching position in baseball is one where you can afford to
have an ego because you rely on yourself more than anybody. I've been the first
to jump on Boggs because of what I deem his selfish hitting style. This I feel
does not benefit the team. However Clemens is payed to go to the mound and
get people out. He does it, he does it well and that is all that matters....
Metz
|
28.309 | It's the media not Roger.. | MPO::GILBERT | Too much month at the end of the money | Tue Jul 31 1990 13:01 | 41 |
|
I took my 11 year old son to the ball game last night. It wasn't
the first time he'ld been but I think it's the first time he really
understood what was going on and appreciated the game. We go to
Pawtucket fairly often and most of you who have been to McCoy know
that it's fairly easy to get autographs and talk to the players.
Well my son couldn't understand why it would be any different at
Fenway (forgive him, I tried to explain about the lunkheads who
play ball here) so after the game I took him to the players gate
and we stood there and watched the players drive out. Some of the
White Sox players weren't taking the bus to the hotel and they walked
out and signed autographs and talked to us for a while(Sammy Sosa
is a real nice guy - Steve Lyons is wierd but he was great with
my son). The rest of this little tale has two parts to it. Both
are exactly what I saw and heard but each shows different sides
of Roger Clemens.
Now all the time we were standing around the gate to the players
lot was open. Jody Reed stood at the gate and talked to folks for
awhile but refused to sign autographs. Not one of the Red Sox players
took the time to stop and sign. There were maybe 15-20 people there
most of them kids. About 45 minutes after the game most of these
people started to filter away. There were now maybe 7 or 8 people
there. All of a sudden one of the clubhouse kids comes through the
lot carrying two enormous suitcases (This kid was about 6 foot tall
and 200 lbs and he was really struggling). He placed them in Roger's
car. The security guards closed the gate. Roger, without any yelling
or screaming from the folks who were left came over, opened the
gate and signed autographs and talked to us for about fifteen minutes.
What I noticed was security guards and clubhouse employees doing
things for Clemens they didn't do for anyone else. I also found
a nice guy who was willing to give a few minutes after a hard days
work to a few kids who waited just to get a glimpse of any player.
One other rather funny point, When Roger finished signing and was
starting back towards his car there was one other car in the lot.
One of the little girls who was standing there asked whose it was.
Roger said " I'm the last player to leave tonight. That's Lou Gorman's
car. He's probably on the phone."
|
28.310 | | GOOBER::ROSS | RALLY time | Tue Jul 31 1990 13:11 | 19 |
| That Roger Clemens.. what an overrated, egotistical, self-centered,
kid-hating, park-effected, late-season-losing, SOB. Where can we
get 4 more like him?
I watched the Sox-Sox game last night on WGN from the 6th inning on
and at the end I said to my wife, "I can't understand where people
get the idea that Roger is not a team player. Same for Boggs, too."
After Jody Reed made a nice play to end a late inning, Clemens waited
for him to give him a handshake. And whenever anybody hits a home
run, Boggs is nearly always the first guy up in the dugout to greet
him.
These guys may have large egos, but they are arguably the best at
what they do. We have no idea what they go through on a day-to-day
basis.
I hope Roger continues to excel and at the same time screw with the
local press. They deserve everything they get.
|
28.311 | Have you shread the Globe today? | GOOBER::ROSS | RALLY time | Tue Jul 31 1990 13:16 | 13 |
| Anyone catch the latest feud between the McDonoughs and the (Mc)Barretts?
Apparently, Will McDonough had been trashing Barrett in the Globe recently,
so Marty happened to bring the subject up with Sean McDonough {the Sox
TV announcer}. A heated exchange took place and was reported in the Herald.
Will's next two columns in the Globe each had strong anti-Barrett "stories."
I think Will's losing it. He came out with a big scoop about Dwight Evans
retiring because his back was so bad and how he didn't want to wait until
the end of the season. Guess who was in the lineup last night? And when
another Globe reporter quoted Evans as saying he had no intention of retiring
{without mentioning McDonough}, Will came back a couple days later with a
story about how surprised Red Sox management was that Dewey wasn't retiring.
|
28.312 | | CAM::WAY | Heave to, and prepare to be boarded! | Tue Jul 31 1990 14:54 | 21 |
| Steve Lyons is definitely one of baseball's characters.
I used to talk with him when he was on the AA New Britain Red Sox.
He *always* took time to talk with anyone and everyone after the game.
He'd answer questions that must have sounded dumb to someone playing ball
for a living, and he always did it with great and style.
He may never make the HoF, but he's given me some memories that will be
passed on to any grandchildren I may have with a smile and a laugh
at the fun part of baseball.
Just as I'll always remember Pudge Fisk for his retort when, because
the Sox were short of third basemen, Pudge went in at third. My
buddy yelled out "So, Pudge, when was the last time you played third?"
Without missing a beat, Pudge yelled back up "Little league"...
I believe it's little things like that which you remember about baseball,
and are truly important parts of our National Pastime....
'Saw
|
28.313 | | SASE::SZABO | Got nothing but hell to pay. | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:17 | 7 |
| re: Steve Lyons
The older kids have affectionately labeled my son "Psycho" recently.
No, he didn't pull down his pants like Lyons, but if you knew this kid,
you'd know why..... :-)
Hawk
|
28.314 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:32 | 8 |
| A regular chip off the old blockhead, hey Hawk?
Heh, heh, heh,
Couldn't resist
Mike JN
PS - No offense intended to blockheads in general, or in particular.
|
28.315 | | SASE::SZABO | Got nothing but hell to pay. | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:44 | 8 |
| Ha! yeah, everyone refers back to me when they see my kid and learns
of his new name..... :-)
BOSTON RED SOX is this note so, what do you fans think of this new kid
just brought up a couple weeks ago. Is he going to stay on as a
regular for many seasons to come?
Hawk
|
28.316 | Tax, Title, Dealer Prep not included.... | CAM::WAY | Nelson Expects | Tue Jul 31 1990 15:49 | 13 |
| Hawk, we're glad to see that you are carrying on the freakin Lunatic
tradition with the fruit of your loins.
This new kid...would that be Naehring or whatever his name is? Haven't
seen enough of him to know. So making a prediction would not be
prudent at this juncture.
This not was not intended to be offensive to freakinlunatics, fruits,
or loins, nor should it be constrewn as a commitment on my part to
predict anything concerns Red Sox players in the future.
'Saw
|
28.317 | And Pete Rose is his favorite player | BUILD::MORGAN | | Wed Aug 01 1990 05:37 | 8 |
| Naehring has the tools to become an everyday major league player.
Sox personnel often compare him to Cal Ripken, IF he pans out.
I've been to two games since he's been called up and saw him hit his
first homer, a shot to left-center. He has power, is enthusiastic,
has a good glove and a strong arm. He came out of nowhere about a
year and a half ago. I think he's about 23.
Steve
|
28.318 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Wed Aug 01 1990 07:44 | 12 |
|
August 1st and the Sox are tied for first, despite going something
like 6-19 in their last 25 games.
The "fat lady", however, is taking voice training and packing her
bags for the dreaded Left Coast engagement Aug. 7 thru 15th.
BTW, has anyone ever seen the proverbial "fat lady" and Roseanne
Barr in the same place? Could it be...? Nahhh....
Dickster
|
28.319 | Roseanne sings, part 2. | SASE::SZABO | Got nothing but hell to pay. | Wed Aug 01 1990 08:13 | 7 |
| Roseanne, my ex-babe, has done a studio version of the Star Spangled
Banner with her husband to be aired on today's Raphael Jesse Sally's
show. She did this in total seriousness and offering it as her public
apology to all offended Americans. Don't know whether she actually
apologizes or not.......
Hawk
|
28.320 | | CAM::WAY | Shrooms, for the ride of your life | Wed Aug 01 1990 08:26 | 17 |
| While Roseanne's singing is not in any way sports related, I will
digress momentarily to say that most of the reaction around here
was that Roseanne is a comedienne, not a singer, and the person
who should be taking most of the heat is the person who arranged
to have her sing in the first place.
Perhaps she could have sung the SPORTS anthem instead:
Oh give me a home, where the junk notes don't roam
And the notes don't get hidden away,
Where never is heard, a disparaging word,
And differences are valued all day
Chainsaw_Scott_Key
|
28.321 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Wed Aug 01 1990 08:34 | 7 |
|
HAHA. Great tune 'Saw.
Now, bailiff, whack his pee-pee if it's not already "set hidden".
Dickster
|
28.322 | Rollward, 'Saw! | SASE::SZABO | Got nothing but hell to pay. | Wed Aug 01 1990 08:36 | 1 |
|
|
28.323 | | GOOBER::ROSS | I need a body bag | Wed Aug 01 1990 08:48 | 6 |
| The Red Sox beat the White Sox last night behind the pitching of
Dana Kiecker, 7-2. Wade Boggs has been effective so far in the
#3 slot, driving in a run for the third straight game.
If the Sox can win the AL East, Joe Morgan deserves Manager of
the Year. That is assuming the White Sox don't take the West.
|
28.324 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Wed Aug 01 1990 09:42 | 13 |
|
Boggs is now hitting like he's on a mission to get those 200 hits
again this year. As a side dish, he's also knocking in some runs
and batting somewhere in the high 300's with men in scoring position.
Tsk. Tsk. How selfish. ;^)
He now needs around 85 more hits in (not sure) 54 games to do it,
but if he avoids all injury, I believe he has the mindset and the
ability to do it. If he can chip away to, say, 20 more hits with
a dozen games to go, I think he'll make it.
Dickster
|
28.325 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 01 1990 09:45 | 3 |
| Dickster, you must be making that up. Wade Boggs, a well known selfish
non clutch hitter, has a higher BA with men on base than he does an
overall BA.
|
28.326 | Time for my Xmas list... | MPO::GILBERT | Too much month at the end of the money | Wed Aug 01 1990 09:53 | 21 |
|
Mighty Lou has done it again. He has put a supposedly healthy
(at least according to himself) Wes Gardner on the DL and signed...
Joe Hesketh...
Former Brave, Former Expo, and hopefully soon to be former Red Sox.
It has to be the curse of Jack Billingham. Lou has to sign every
misfit project discarded by other teams in hopes of finding that
one guy who has a little gas left. Reports are that Mr. Hesketh
will bring his 5.81 ERA in 31 appearances and 5 saves to the Sox
bullpen and "help" Rob Murphy.
Lou, how gullible do you think we are? Better yet, how gullible
do you think the rest of the league is?
Santa, please bring Jean Yawkey to her senses and bring us a real
GM....
|
28.327 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A Zorro snap in the Z formation! | Wed Aug 01 1990 09:56 | 17 |
| Wade Boggs is a one dimensional, egotistical, me first, non team
player. Always has been, always will be. He hits for average,
but does nothing else well. He's perhaps the most overrated hitter
in the history of the game.
Doug, I can't understand how you can like a one dimensional player
like Boggs - I thought you didn't like one dimensional players....
He can't play defense, unless the ball is hit right at him - he
has the range of a legless moose, he moves like a slug with training
wheels, he has less power than Pee Wee Herman, and he never comes
through in the clutch - witnessed by his stellar play in the ALCS.
He's another player who will never wear a champeenship ring, unless
he ends up on another team that can carry his bags.
JD
|
28.328 | skip....skip....skip.....skip...skip.. | JACKAL::DIGGINS | Me and Elvis went to McDonald's | Wed Aug 01 1990 09:58 | 7 |
|
Jd your a piece of work!
Steve
|
28.329 | | GOOBER::ROSS | I need a body bag | Wed Aug 01 1990 10:28 | 43 |
| > Wade Boggs is a one dimensional, egotistical, me first, non team
> player. Always has been, always will be. He hits for average,
> but does nothing else well. He's perhaps the most overrated hitter
> in the history of the game.
You'll have to try harder, JD... I'm not going to bite. You just called
Roger Clemens the most overrated pitcher the other day. You gotta try and
let go of that Boston-based anger.
What does Wade Boggs's or Roger Clemens' personality have to do with their
ability and performance as baseball players?
> Doug, I can't understand how you can like a one dimensional player
> like Boggs - I thought you didn't like one dimensional players....
I don't value them in basketball where deficiencies can be covered up
by other players.
> He can't play defense, unless the ball is hit right at him - he
> has the range of a legless moose, he moves like a slug with training
> wheels, he has less power than Pee Wee Herman, and he never comes
> through in the clutch - witnessed by his stellar play in the ALCS.
JD's version of "Field of Dreams".
"If I say it, it must be true"
Boggs is no worse than the second best leadoff hitter of the 80's and
an above average major league third baseman according to people who know
a little more about the game than you or I. If you can bring yourself
to examine him in that context, you might be able to be more objective.
Power is a non-factor. As a leadoff hitter, look at OBA, Runs.
"Never comes thru in the clutch" is just another baiting phrase. It's
your definition of clutch. And at least he has been a key factor in
getting the team to that situation.
> He's another player who will never wear a champeenship ring, unless
> he ends up on another team that can carry his bags.
Rings, shmings. In evaluating individuals, rings don't mean a thing.
There's plenty of good players without them {Mattingly springs to mind}.
|
28.330 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Savage Amusement | Wed Aug 01 1990 10:30 | 11 |
| Dickster is right!!!!!! Boggs needs a lot more hits! I saw this
watching a game, was it last week??
The announcer said he had about the same # of hits last year around
the same time and mangaged to get 200 in.
I believe they said it would be his 8th continuous year with 200+
hits.....something only a few greats ball players have done!
Wheel
|
28.331 | | OOPS::MACGREGOR | | Wed Aug 01 1990 11:16 | 4 |
| I'm fairly certain that should Boggs get #200 he will be the ONLY
person to do it 8 consecutive times.
The Wizard
|
28.332 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A Zorro snap in the Z formation! | Wed Aug 01 1990 11:38 | 19 |
| Doug,
Bogggs is an average 3rd baseman, at best. He matadors any ball
that causes him to move in a way that he might perspire.
ANd remember, no Boston anger in me - I love the town, love the
Sox.
Boggs and Clemens are overrated, but so are all boston sports folks
- oh wait, I forgot, only other cities overrate their players....
Lets see, the Sox have the 2nd best leadoff hitter of the 80's,
who is the best hitter in baseball in boggs, the best pitcher ever
in Clemens, the MVP man in center, the next Cal Ripkin at short,
etc., yet they caint win the big ones. Hmmm, why is that. Perhaps
you need to look no further than the Ego twins, Boggs and Clemens.
They put themselves first, the team last.
JD
|
28.333 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 01 1990 11:46 | 17 |
| � Bogggs is an average 3rd baseman, at best. He matadors any ball
� that causes him to move in a way that he might perspire.
C'mon JD, you can't really believe that. I guess you must have missed
that defensive display of his in the All Star game.
� They put themselves first, the team last.
Baseball is a team of individuals. There are a few things I'll never
understand about statements like the one above. How is a player who is
doing the best he can at what he does (and is one of the best at what
he does) putting himself above the team? How can a pitcher who has
publically said that he will stick up for his teammates and then
delivered on it be putting himself above the team? Sorry, baseball
doesn't have situations that require setting a key block for a score,
or dishing off and setting a pick for another player to get the winning
basket.
|
28.334 | How bout another viewpoint... | CAM::WAY | Shrooms, for the ride of your life | Wed Aug 01 1990 11:56 | 29 |
| One thing that I can appreciate about Boggs is the fact that he
worked and works very hard on his defensive skills. He has improved
tremendously since he first came up.
Is he a natural defensive 3rd baseman? No. But he worked hard to get
where he is. He could have just tried to get along with his phenomenal
hitting skills, but he felt he needed to be a rounded player to
succeed in the game.
Players are human beings. Ted Williams always got the rap that he
was cold. Others have been rapped for other things. Limelight does
funny things to people -- sometimes it truly changes them, other
times it causes the way people see what are normal human foibles
to change. Thus a person who is typically shy and reserved can
be labelled cold and standoffish.
We should always try to remember to put ourselves in their places
before we make value judgements.
How many times have any of you snapped at a co-worker, whether out
of frustration with a situation at home, a car that doesn't run right,
or Uncle Sam taking so much of your paycheck. Now, imagine the
same situation in major league baseball. You're still a human being,
you're still frustrated, but now you've got a million presshounds telling
the world that you're a prima dona who snaps at your teammates because
you think you're better than they are....
JMHO,
Chainsaw
|
28.335 | | GOOBER::ROSS | I need a body bag | Wed Aug 01 1990 11:59 | 49 |
| > Bogggs is an average 3rd baseman, at best. He matadors any ball
> that causes him to move in a way that he might perspire.
Total fabrication. You can keep saying it a hundred times,
but it looks more foolish each time. Your "analysis" of
Boggs' defensive skills goes 180� against the general, informed
view.
> Boggs and Clemens are overrated, but so are all boston sports folks
> - oh wait, I forgot, only other cities overrate their players....
I've never understood what "overrated" means. Are you talking
about the lunatic fringe who wouldn't trade Boggs for Will Clark
and Kevin Mitchell without Matt Williams thrown in? Or are you
speaking of those hometown fans who greatly appreciate the talents
of those players who they see most often? Who cares?
> Lets see, the Sox have the 2nd best leadoff hitter of the 80's,
> who is the best hitter in baseball in boggs, the best pitcher ever
> in Clemens, the MVP man in center, the next Cal Ripkin at short,
> etc., yet they caint win the big ones. Hmmm, why is that. Perhaps
> you need to look no further than the Ego twins, Boggs and Clemens.
> They put themselves first, the team last.
You've finally convinced me, JD. You can quote me, "Clemens
and Boggs suck".
But, since I'm joining your side, let's add some other teams
and players to our hate-list.
New York Yankees had Don Mattingly - "The Best Player in Baseball"
and Dave Righetti - a record setting reliever, for several years
and couldn't even do as well as the Sox. Suck.
Utah Jazz - Karl Malone and John Stockton... They make up a larger
percentage of the team, yet they both bite the big one cause they
suck in the clutch... And we all know about Karl Malone's ego. Suck.
Chicago Cubs - Ryne Sandberg... voted most exciting player in NL
this year by baseball personnel. Last place. Suck.
New York Knicks. Pat Ewing. Suck.
Los Angeles Kings. Wayne Gretzky. Suck.
I've seen the light. Two players {one who can only affect
20% of the outcomes of the games in a season, the other who
score more runs than any other} are the cause.
|
28.336 | Clemens doesn't even rate on the overrated scale as long as Wade plays | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Thank you, Fay | Wed Aug 01 1990 12:16 | 18 |
| >C'mon JD, you can't really believe that. I guess you must have missed
>that defensive display of [Boggs] in the All Star game.
Yes, JD, didn't that stop he made on a grounder (the one where he left
his feet and got his uniform all dirty, even though most major league
3Bs make the play on their feet) in this year's All Star game wipe your
mind clean of a career of being a statue in the field? Well, didn't
it??
He also hit a homer in last year's All Star game, which instantly makes
him one of the games great power hitters in the eyes of some.
By the way, Boggs is keeping his career record of home and away hitting
intact this year. Some will continue to believe that the park has
nothing to do with it.
Dan
|
28.337 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 01 1990 12:18 | 2 |
| Except, Dan, that those defensive plays shown in the All Star game (and
there was more than a grounder), are the rule not the exception.
|
28.338 | I've already waxed eloquent on his hitting ability | TOPDWN::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Wed Aug 01 1990 12:26 | 16 |
|
I'll have to say I agree with neither of the two camps in regards to Boggs
defensive abilities...
He was a well below average 3rd baseman defensively when he came to the bigs.
He ahs improved himself immensely to the point where he is an average 3rd baseman
now. He doesn't butcher balls hit to him like Garry Sheffield but he doesn't
have the great range to be an excellent 3rd baseman.
He is an adequate fielder in a position that most managers rely on for offensive
ability rather than defensive ability. Third base is probably the 7th or 8th
easiest defensive position in the game (arguments between lf and 3rd as easier)
Pitcher the 9th easiest....
Metz
|
28.339 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 01 1990 12:32 | 6 |
| Apparently JD's rememberances of Boggs post-season offensive
performances have caused him to overlook the defensive contributions he
made during those series.
3B 7th or 8th most important position defensively? That's a new one on
me.
|
28.340 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A Zorro snap in the Z formation! | Wed Aug 01 1990 12:38 | 22 |
| Mac,
I always thought team chemistry was an important part of any team
sport. If a team is just a bunch of individuals, it will go no
where - which is where the Sox are going.
Doug,
A simplification. My comment was based towards the boston media/fans
that I heard for the 13 years I lived there - Boston always seems
to have the greatest players to ever breathe, but never goes anywhere.
I'm just giving back criticisms that we, who are from different
parts of the country, have had to hear from Boston fans concerning
other teams and players.
Re Boggs fielding - wow, he makes a good play every eon or so and
he's canonized as a Brooks Robinson. Geez - that's a PERFECT example
of typical BoSox fans' view. Wade is, as I said, average at best
in the field. He has absolutely no range...
JD
|
28.341 | Tied for 1st, but for how long? | BUILD::MORGAN | | Wed Aug 01 1990 12:49 | 21 |
| Sheet, when I first read JD's note I thought it was sarcastic in tone,
but obviously not.
JD, as far as I know, nobody in this note has stated that Roger Clemens
is the "best pitcher ever", or that Tim Naehring is the next Cal
Ripken, or that Ellis Burkes is the AL MVP, as you stated in .332.
Who's doing the exagerating now?
Anyway, back to the subject.
The Sox have been very fortunate to date considering their pitching
rotation. Career minor leaguers are pitching as never expected as has
journeyman, Greg Harris. I don't know if this is complimentary to
Bill Fisher, Tony Pena, the demise of hitting in the A.L., or a
combination of all the above. Whatever the case, they're holding my
interest. Morgan has made his share of mistakes, but managing in Boston
isn't easy. The fans are so obsessed with winning it all, that
everyone's a supposed expert.
Steve
|
28.342 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Savage Amusement | Wed Aug 01 1990 12:50 | 7 |
| JD,
Chemistry in a team is great, unfortunately it is not the only
pre-requisite. If the players are lousy then the chemistry
means nothing!
Wheel
|
28.343 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A Zorro snap in the Z formation! | Wed Aug 01 1990 13:02 | 16 |
| Steve,
Yes, my original note was sarcastic in nature. All the things I
said I've heard one place or the other (The RED SOX conference,
perhaps....).
Anyway, back to the Red Sox - they are in town soon (I think) and
plan to go to as many of the games as I can.
Joe Hesketh is not the answer - unless the change in leagues helps
him a lot. I've seen him 3 times this year, and have seen him pitch
batting practice each time. This guy couldn't stand getting booed
in Montreal - imagine what Fenway will do to him.
JD
|
28.344 | Boys Don't Cry | RONALD::VENDER | | Wed Aug 01 1990 13:17 | 5 |
| I'm going to my first Sox game in about 5 or six years at Fenway
tonight. Does anyone know who's pitching tonight(haven't seen a
newspaper or the news in over a week.
TomR
|
28.345 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Shoulda turned left at Albuquerque | Wed Aug 01 1990 13:35 | 3 |
| Tom Bolton is pitching for Boston.
Mark.
|
28.346 | Hope there are some entertaining drunks tonight | RONALD::VENDER | | Wed Aug 01 1990 14:05 | 2 |
| Thanks Mark.
|
28.347 | Versus the rejuvenated Jack McDowell | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed Aug 01 1990 14:13 | 0 |
28.348 | you're only as good as your last outing | ASABET::CORBETT | Mike Corbett - 223-9889 | Wed Aug 01 1990 14:52 | 8 |
|
> Tom Bolton is pitching for Boston.
or as NESN has been sayin Boston's new left ace, Tom Bolton.
mc
|
28.349 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 01 1990 15:22 | 5 |
| JD, you want to point out where I said that Boggs is a Brooks Robinson,
or even where I said that he is the best 3b in baseball? Maybe you
should just relax. This crusade you are on to compensate for the
alleged overrating of Boston players is going to turn you into a raving
lunatic.
|
28.350 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | A Zorro snap in the Z formation! | Wed Aug 01 1990 16:07 | 18 |
| Mac,
You never said it, it was an embellishment on my part. I still
think Wade is good at one thing only - hitting. And he's damn good
at it, at that there is no question. I still feel he's a me-first
person, more interested in his precious stats then with the team's
record.
He's what I call a true, blue, rotis owner's dream player. Puts
up great stats, keeps the stat hounds happy, helps a rotis player
(rotis being a total stats game - takes the human element completely
out of the game...).
And finally, IMO, Wade's a perfect example of this conference -
because if Wade was on the Yankees or Mets, and not the Red Sox,
he'd forever be labeled an overrated, egotistical head case.
JD
|
28.351 | | TOPDWN::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Wed Aug 01 1990 16:38 | 54 |
|
> 3B 7th or 8th most important position defensively? That's a new one on
> me.
yup...here's my list in order of importance and reasons why...
1 catcher - calls the game, handles the ball every pitch, needs good arm for
throwing out base stealers, has to be quick to field the bunt.
2 ss - Needs great range on ground balls, great throwing arm for throws deep
in the hole, Needs to be able to turn the DP and make tags on
attempted base stealers. takes cutoff throws.
3 centerfield - needs speed to cover much ground, needs to be quick to get a
jump on well hit balls, needs good arm for throws to 2nd,3rd and
home.
4 2nd base - much the same as SS but doesn't need as good an arm. Must turn a
more difficult dp and have decent range. Takes cutoff throws and
cover 2nd on steals.
5 rf - needs excellent throwing arm to make the throw to 3rd, good arm for
throws to 2nd and home. Good speed to catch balls tailing away.
Usually a better much better fielder than lf.
6 1st base - doesn't need great range but must field 10+ throws a game from
infield. Must start off difficult 3-6-3 dp. Must be able to
cover bunt. Must be able to move off the bag and cover position
after holding runner on base. Must be able to decide when
stretch is needed and execute it.
7 or 8 3rd base - doesn't need great range, Most balls are reaction plays. Needs
good reactions and a good throwing arm but only on slow choppers
Has to be able to cover bunt. Doesn't see to many fielding
chances per game. Doesn't get involved in many steal efforts,
doesn't get involved in much cutoff action. (whenever they let
a hot shot get past them announcers always cover up :-) :-)
7 or 8 rf - doesn't need great speed usually, weaker throwing arm needed for
throws to 3rd, Usually the place where most teams hide their
weakest defensive player
9 Pitcher - Out there to pitch and not field. A good fielding pitcher can
help himself by fielding comebackers and bunts well. As well as
backing up the play...
Feel free to discuss....
These are just my opinions..............
Metz
|
28.352 | naw | CNTROL::CHILDS | and so castles made of sand... | Wed Aug 01 1990 20:00 | 6 |
|
Excellent arguments Metz can't say I disagree with your reasoning...
could it have something do with the fact that I catch? :^)
mike
|
28.353 | Here's the play at the plate ... | SHALOT::HUNT | Wyld Stallyns Rules | Wed Aug 01 1990 20:48 | 10 |
| I was a catcher, also. Loved every minute of it.
Another reason why the catcher is the most important defensive position
is that all the other eight players face him. He is the man who calls
the shots. Plus, home plate is where the runs are scored so the last
line of defense is always the most important.
Just my biased opinion ...
Bob Hunt
|
28.354 | It's my favorite posistion | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Wed Aug 01 1990 21:22 | 11 |
|
Yeah Bob and sometimes those shots don't get heard. Tonights' game we had
a guy dead at the plate and the pitcher cut the ball off. I thought I was
supposed to yell cut if I wante it cut? :^)
even still the runner stopped and we had em dead in a pickle except the
pitcher dropped the ball...
oh well we won anyways so it wasn't that costly...
mike
|
28.355 | He should've pulled out of the game after the 1st hit..... | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Aug 02 1990 07:37 | 4 |
| Wade Boggs had 3 hits last night, 2 of which were clearly
selfish........ :-)
Hawk
|
28.357 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Can you breathe thru YOUR ears? | Thu Aug 02 1990 08:06 | 1 |
| That makes about 118 hits for Wade!
|
28.358 | | CAM::WAY | Shrooms, for the ride of your life | Thu Aug 02 1990 08:12 | 25 |
| In my time I've played CF, C, RF and 1B.
I'd say the hardest to play was catcher, but part of that was that
I'm a lefty. At any rate, the calling the shots part of it is tough
too. More than any other fielder, I think, the catcher must play
that "what if" game when players are on base.
CF was hard also, because of the arm. I used to have a good arm.
Can't pitch worth a darn, but could always get the ball within
the catchers reach. Also had good range -- not much speed, but an
excellent jump.
I will go on record however as saying the hardest thing, I think,
in baseball, is throwing a runner out at 3rd, from RF. Just being
heads up enough to know when to try for it, and then doing it, are
very hard.
1B was fun. Always have that old dilemma though -- stretch or short
hop.
I guess I liked CF the best....
Thanks for letting me reminisce...
'Saw
|
28.359 | Boggs Watch: needs 79 hits to reach 200 | BUILD::MORGAN | | Thu Aug 02 1990 08:36 | 1 |
|
|
28.360 | I clearly hope he makes it again.... | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Aug 02 1990 08:39 | 5 |
| > 79 hits to reach 200 (again)
How many of those would be considered selfish hits? :-)
Hawk
|
28.361 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Can you breathe thru YOUR ears? | Thu Aug 02 1990 08:41 | 1 |
| All of them ;^)
|
28.362 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Shoulda turned left at Albuquerque | Thu Aug 02 1990 08:49 | 6 |
| Metz, I'd move RF way up to number 3.
The RF typically sees balls talingin away (from right-handed batters)
and has the longest throws due to his distance from 3b.
Mark.
|
28.363 | Only HoF RF in Fenway... | MPO::GILBERT | Too much month at the end of the money | Thu Aug 02 1990 09:03 | 4 |
|
I agree with Mark. But that might be a Red Sox prejudice. We tend
to hide our weakest defensive player in Left Field.
|
28.364 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Thu Aug 02 1990 09:26 | 7 |
|
But how many chances does a rf see in a game? Not as many as center or
second that's why I agree with Metz. While the ball does tail away most
experienced rf know this and adjust accordingly.
mike
|
28.365 | born to DH... | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Thu Aug 02 1990 09:29 | 5 |
|
Also the centerfielder must back up both the lf and rf in case of the
occasional error, which happen quite frequently in lf at fenway ;^)
mike
|
28.366 | glad so many of you agree...how about you Mac? | TOPDWN::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Thu Aug 02 1990 09:50 | 11 |
|
The reasons I put Rf low was because of the # of chances they handle a ball
in a game, Less range required than CF and not as much thought/decision
making ability required as 2nd.
They do need to have an excellent arm to make the long throw to 3rd but it
doesn't happen that often and a good right fielder can keep a man from taking
3rd of reputation alone....
Metz
|
28.367 | | CAM::WAY | Shrooms, for the ride of your life | Thu Aug 02 1990 09:57 | 9 |
| I disagree. RF, at Fenway anyway, is very tough to play.
That's because if you screw up, there's a toofless bearded mountain
man, and 12 kids from Mefaa ready to tell him he's a waste of skin...
Or is that a ParkDefect(tm)?
'Saw
|
28.368 | | QUASER::JOHNSTON | LegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.! | Thu Aug 02 1990 10:25 | 10 |
| Wade Boggs is god.... and JD knows it. He's just trying to get people
riled up. In fact, JD has a small shrine to Wade hidden behind a secret
sliding panel in his living room.
Wow! Seven years (heading for eight) of over 200 selfish hits per year.
What a greedy little pig!
Mike JN
No offense blah blah pigs, hitters, blah blah wade's mother, blah etc.
|
28.369 | Sam Horn at 3B ???? | COGITO::HILL | | Thu Aug 02 1990 11:53 | 12 |
| I dunno, but I always thought that teams put a big slow lummox at 1st
since it is an easier position than 3rd. 1B does not need an arm or
very good range, however, he needs to be able to work the feet around
the bag and know whether he should stretch or take the short hop. He
also needs to have decent hands, but that goes with any position.
At 3B, he needs to have more range, a better arm, and quicker reflexes.
With a RH pull hitter, it can be downright dangerous. Look at how many
3B have made theswitch to 1B later in their careers. Tony Perez and
George Brett come to mind, but obviously there are a ton of others.
Tom
|
28.370 | Another mystery solved! | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Aug 02 1990 12:01 | 11 |
| Tom, thank you for the "big slow lummox". Ever since that World Series
where the Cardinals got shafted and lost to Kansas City, I've been
seeking the correct terminology to describe Steve Balboni. And "big
slow lummox" is it exactly, to a T!
Actually, you should (tm) balboni as the substitute for "big slow
lummox".......
:-)
Hawk
|
28.371 | Wouldn't recognize Frank Howard today | COGITO::HILL | | Thu Aug 02 1990 12:36 | 11 |
| That one just came to me... The kind of guys I had in mind were Boog
Powell, George Scott, Frank Howard, and definitely Balboni. Funny thing
about Frank Howard is that he's as skinny as a rail these days. I saw
him in spring training before the '89 season (Yankee hitting coach) and
had a chance to talk with him. I remember seeing him with the Washinton
Senators & he and Ted Williams would have batting practice HR contests.
Waht does a ball cost, $2? No wonder the Seantors lost money & had to
move to Texas!
Tom
|
28.372 | | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Aug 02 1990 12:44 | 6 |
| > Boog Powell, George Scott, Frank Howard, Balboni.....
Add Harmon Killebrew. Actually, Balboni shouldn't be included in this
particular group of lummoxes. At least these guys could hit......
Hawk
|
28.373 | I wouldn't rate 1B over 3B | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Thu Aug 02 1990 12:44 | 1 |
|
|
28.374 | Boggs keeps getting gypped out of Gold Gloves. Poor Wade. Poor Boston | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Thank you, Fay | Thu Aug 02 1990 14:02 | 9 |
| >Except, Dan, that those defensive plays shown in the All Star game (and
>there was more than a grounder), are the rule not the exception.
I believe you. Not because you said it, understand. But because the
Tooth Fairy told me so.
If only my eyes would stop showing me reality...
Dan
|
28.375 | Toungue planted firmly in cheek. | JACKAL::DIGGINS | Me and Elvis went to McDonald's | Thu Aug 02 1990 14:47 | 7 |
|
Of course we all know that Don Mattingly is the best player in
baseball, even this season!
Steve
|
28.376 | Unfounded critisism. | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | Little Homer Simpson in all of us | Thu Aug 02 1990 15:00 | 7 |
| That selfish bum Wade Boggs showed his true colors lasted night.
With Quintana on first, Morgan called for a hit and run. What did
Mr. Selfish do?? Promptly laced a ball into RF to move Carlos to 3rd.
Wow. Imagine that.
Rich
|
28.377 | | CAM::WAY | Shrooms, for the ride of your life | Thu Aug 02 1990 15:15 | 1 |
| Gawd, what a heinous display of ergegiously selfish hitting!
|
28.378 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Thu Aug 02 1990 15:19 | 4 |
| � -< Boggs keeps getting gypped out of Gold Gloves. Poor Wade. Poor >-
True. There was the season that he finished 2nd to a declining George
Brett.
|
28.379 | Boggs is no Butch Hobson!!! | GOLF::KINGR | I'll try to keep this reply to only ....... | Thu Aug 02 1990 21:02 | 5 |
| Gold golves is a garbage award... Just like the world chumps of boxing.
Its a popularity contest... Range means nothing... A good firstbaseman
saves a lot of errors for the infield...
REK
|
28.380 | Substance over style | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Thank you, Fay | Fri Aug 03 1990 12:00 | 19 |
| >True. There was the season that he finished 2nd to a declining George
>Brett.
Brett may have been declining, but Boggs never approached Brett with
the glove, and the truth be told, Brett was far from spectacular with
it. He just was the best with it at the position in the post-Nettles,
pre-Gaetti years.
Most of Wade's fielding impressions are courtesy of the Boston press.
He has already peaked and at his best was a slightly better than
average 3B with the glove. Always had a powerful arm though, which is
flashy, but not so important at the hot corner.
Most Boston and Boggs fans allow themselves to be easily fooled by
false impressions (such as the All Star game, and consistent kind
articles). It's a good thing I'm around to straighten you guys out.
Dan
|
28.381 | Boggs is the Best 3B EVER | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Aug 03 1990 13:50 | 7 |
| Anyone got a spare set of hip-boots I can borrow in this note?
Dan, you're so full of it lately, you're tarnishing your image in
here. How one can tarnish bullsh*t I'll never know, but you're
doing it! :*)
Lee
|
28.382 | The Gospel according to Dan | GOOBER::ROSS | I need a body bag | Fri Aug 03 1990 20:17 | 34 |
| > Most of Wade's fielding impressions are courtesy of the Boston press.
> He has already peaked and at his best was a slightly better than
> average 3B with the glove. Always had a powerful arm though, which is
> flashy, but not so important at the hot corner.
Dan's never one to let stats get in the way of an argument.. Here's
a breakdown of fielding stats for Boggs vs. Gaetti from 1984 to
1987. George Brett is included where he played enough games to
make it worth comparing.
Games PO ASS E Edge?
1987 Boggs 147 111 277 14
Gaetti 154 134 261 11 Even
1986 Boggs 149 121 267 19
Gaetti 157 118 334 21 Gaetti..
Brett 124 97 218 16
1985 Boggs 161 134 335 17
Gaetti 160 146 316 18 Even
Brett 155 107 339 15
1984 Boggs 158 141 330 20
Gaetti 162 142 334 20 Even
> Most Boston and Boggs fans allow themselves to be easily fooled by
> false impressions (such as the All Star game, and consistent kind
> articles). It's a good thing I'm around to straighten you guys out.
> Dan
Good thing we Boston fans have an objective, factual, accurate source
to fall back on. While Boggs never was the best 3B, he certainly did
earn his repuation as a better than average 3B.
|
28.383 | | SASE::SZABO | | Mon Aug 06 1990 08:46 | 12 |
| Yeah but, Doug, Fenway is a 3rd baseman's dream park. Didn't you know
that? So stats don't mean squat, right Dan? :-)
And speaking of stats, Wade has selfishly been ripping the hide off the
ball in this home stand. And we all know that, clearly, the one and
only thing in Wade's mind when he steps up at bat is to get yet another
200-hit season. Getting some runners across is purely a_accident and
unintentional...... :-)
Go get 'em, Wade!
Hawk
|
28.384 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Buzzed by the Blue Angels.... | Mon Aug 06 1990 09:50 | 22 |
| Doug,
Of course, stats don't measure things like range - of which Wade
has none, and Gaetti has lots. That's the problems with stats.
Everything can't be measured in pure numbers. Wade's a great hitter
(a singles hitter, and fenway doubles...), and an average fielder
- which is what has been said ad nauseum.
IMO, the measure of Wade is the answer to this question: Would
Wade rather get 200 hits and hit over .300, and not win a champeenship,
or would he rather get 100 hits and bat .250 or so and be on a
W.S. winner?. My guess is the former. He's the type that if he
was hitting .400 with 4 games left, he'd mysteriously pull a hamstring
or strain his mustache, instead of being a man like Ted Williams
was.
You've said you'd take 9 Wade's on your team. That's great - you'd
win your rotis. league hands down. IN REAL baseball, you'd win
nothing but some individual awards....
JD
Wade would rather do the first
|
28.385 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Aug 06 1990 10:19 | 7 |
|
re: -1
9 Boggs on one rotis team does not make a winner... that would
give you average and RPs... but nil in HRs and SBs... now,
talk about 9 Rickey Henderson's or 9 Jose Canseco's and that's
a different story... (even 9 Strawberries...)
|
28.386 | Score : Wade - 1 JD - 0 | GOOBER::ROSS | I need a body bag | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:34 | 25 |
| > <<< Note 28.384 by RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Buzzed by the Blue Angels...." >>>
>
> Doug,
>
> Of course, stats don't measure things like range - of which Wade
> has none, and Gaetti has lots. That's the problems with stats.
> Everything can't be measured in pure numbers.
Geez... if over a four year period, two players have roughly an equal number
of assists, that would normally mean they get to the same number of
groundballs. Thus, it would not be farfetched to say that the players have
comparable range. Can you explain it some other way???? We're not talking
about 10 games you might have seen. We're talking about 600 games and over
1500+ total chances and the numbers come out pretty close.
Just like home runs and slugging percentage are a measure of power,
assists are a measure of range. It's pretty simple. It's objective.
It's the truth. Your biased opinion is just that... and, worse, it's false.
A team of Wade Boggs {batters} would set records for runs scored. They
would be a mediocre rotisserie team, though.
|
28.387 | [Sigh] If only Wade played somewhere else, he'd be a hero! | SASE::SZABO | | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:40 | 4 |
| Doug, for chrissakes, Fenway has a much smaller infield than any other
ballpark in the universe, didn't you know that? :-)
Hawk
|
28.388 | well, if you're gonna be scientific | RGB::DICHIARA | peter | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:45 | 6 |
|
not to stir up too much trouble, but wade's home field is grass and gaeti's
is astroturf. There's a pretty good argument that grass slows down groundballs
significantly enough to increase wade's range, as you measure it by number
of assists.
|
28.389 | long grass also | ASABET::CORBETT | Mike Corbett - 223-9889 | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:47 | 0 |
28.390 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | All the action begins here | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:47 | 12 |
| Re: Saturday's game
I woke up in time to see Jody Reed get ejected from the game.
What did he get ejected for? Yelling at that bozo McKeon (sp)?
What made it all the funnier was when they came back from commerical
break and they showed Reed in the dugout chewing him out. Boy, was Reed
livid! Now if only I could read lips...
|
28.391 | | CAM::WAY | Get Matt Sewell his jersey! | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:48 | 11 |
| AFter ingesting an inordinate amount of SPORTshrooms at the game
Saturday, I was able to see this black hole anomaly halfway between
3rd and Home.
Ground balls hit there rocket away from Wade, forcing him to cover
more ground.
Therefore, Wade is a better 3B.
HTH,
Sweatin_Saw
|
28.392 | | TOPDWN::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:48 | 25 |
|
Assists are strictly a measure of the number of balls that a players was able
to get to. Which is strictly a factor of the number of balls hit to a player.
I'm quite sure that it doesn't take into account the number of balls hit in the
general vacinity of a player.
Imagine this doug...
Player A has 5 bob Stanley type throwers in his starting rotation..He gets
1000 balls hit in his general vacinity. He has the range of the Venus de Milo.
He gets to 500 of these balls and gets 500 assists.
Players B has 5 Nolan Ryan type throwers in his starting rotation. He gets 600
balls hit in his general vacinity. He has the range of Ozzie Smith. He gets to
500 of these balls and gets 500 assists. They are both responsible for the same
number of outs but one obviously has much more range than the other.
Using your numbers they are both equal players....
Yet another example of using statistics to tell 1/2 the story....
Metz
|
28.393 | | GOOBER::ROSS | I need a body bag | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:53 | 13 |
| Well, for a 3B, we're talking about 2 assists per game on the average.
The turf also provides a cleaner hop and fewer short rollers that a
player beats out for hits.
To me, there's three ways to gauge range...
Coming in on a bunt/tapper...
Grabbing balls down the line...
and Grabbing balls to the SS side...
I state {subjectively} that Boggs is above average on the first two and
average on the third. Combine that with a powerful arm and a good ability
to go out to LF foul area for popups, and I still say he's above average.
|
28.394 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Help Jane, stop this crazy thing! | Mon Aug 06 1990 11:53 | 11 |
| re .390:
Reed got ejected for arguing a called third strike.
re .388:
Point well taken on grass slowing a ball down, but one also gets truer
hops on turf...six of one, half dozen of the other....
py
|
28.395 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | All the action begins here | Mon Aug 06 1990 12:05 | 2 |
| Thanks Paul, the announcers didn't know if it was something he said
or some gesture (ha ha) he made to the ref!
|
28.396 | | GOOBER::ROSS | I need a body bag | Mon Aug 06 1990 12:06 | 47 |
| And no team fields a team of Nolan Ryan's or Bob Stanley's. There's
bound to be a true mix of ground outs, fly outs, and strike outs over
a four year period. Twins had Viola and Allan Anderson, two lefties,
who are ground ball pitchers I think. Bert Blyleven was a fly ball
pitcher {some REAL LONG fly balls in Minn}.
Here's the pitching staffs for the Twins/Red Sox during that period:
1984 Twins Red Sox
Viola Hurst
Smithson Ojeda
Butcher Boyd
Filson Nipper
Filson Clemens
Ron Davis Stanley
Clear
1985 Twins Red Sox
Viola Hurst
Smithson Ojeda
Butcher Boyd
Schrom Nipper
Blyleven Clemens
Ron Davis Crawford
1986 Twins Red Sox
Viola Hurst
Smithson Seaver
Heaton Boyd
Portugal Nipper
Blyleven Clemens
Ron Davis Schiraldi
1987 Twins Red Sox
Blyleven Clemens
Viola Hurst
Straker Nipper
Smithson Stanley
Berenguer Sellers
Neikro Gardner
Reardon Schiraldi
I don't think you can make a case for either team being all of one
type....
|
28.397 | please notice the smilies.... | TOPDWN::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Mon Aug 06 1990 12:21 | 22 |
|
Sorry Doug,
You can't just switch back and forth between subjective opinions and statistics.
Either present the stats that say both 3rd baseman had an equal number of
balls hit in their vacinity or admit that you are making a totally subjective
observation that Boggs is equal to Gaetti in your opinion.
You can't have it both ways ya know :-)
Maybe you can invent a "new" statistic that plots all the balls hit in a game
and calculates out the average range of a 3rd baseman and draws a semi eliptical
pattern around them so that you can calculate out who had what number of balls
hit to them and what percentage they actually got to. Possibly # of balls that
the 3rd baseman got to divided by # of balls hit within an average 3rd basemans
range to that player = range index....Or we could just call it the Ross #.
You SABRE types would have a field day with it and you could all be busy for the
next 10 years calculating it for every ball player known to man :-)
Metz
|
28.398 | | GOOBER::ROSS | I need a body bag | Mon Aug 06 1990 12:38 | 30 |
| I noticed the smileys... but I'm not a SABR type... {and I do know
those eggheads :-)}. I look at raw numbers - assists... and conclude that over
four years, if two players have roughly the same number, then they
are probably getting to the same number of groundballs, thus to say
one has far better range than the other lacks credibility.
Others take those numbers and come up with "Yeah, but he plays on
grass" or "yeah, but if he had 16 Nolan Ryans..." I've done no
analysis. I presented the raw stats and then responded to your
comment by showing that the staffs were not all of one type. So
where am I going too far?
Brooks Robinson is considered one of the best fielding 3B ever...
He played on grass... he played on a team with {normally} an
excellent pitching staff... And the numbers show that he got about
10% more assists per game than Boggs and Gaetti... Making one think
that he probably had better range. Is that so hard to figure out?
In 1974, Brooks got 410 assists... I don't think Gaetti or Boggs
ever came close to that. Mike Schmidt did. Again, another great
3B.
I'm just looking quickly at the book, but it looks like Boggs got
about 20% assists than Butch Hobson normally did, and about 25% more
than Carney Lansford while with the Sox. 10% more than Petrocelli
when he played there. About the same as Joe Foy with fewer errors.
You have to go back to the middle 50's and Frank Malzone to find
a Red Sox 3B who got more assists. And I think Malzone was considered
an excellent fielder.
|
28.399 | | RGB::DICHIARA | peter | Mon Aug 06 1990 13:03 | 11 |
|
your point about robinson is well taken. however, if the o's playing
with robinson played against the sox's with wade, i doubt that even you
would say they were comparable infielders.
of course, i'm biased being a boggs-basher, but you have to give wade the
credit for making the ordinary into the sublime. how many times a game do you
have to see him fall spin and dive for a ball 2 feet away from him.
if only he'd hit more homers 8^)))))
|
28.400 | | USRCV1::COLOTTIR | Little Homer Simpson in all of us | Mon Aug 06 1990 13:58 | 8 |
| That fall-spin-hop-up is a standard 3rd baseman move. Nettles was the
best at it. Play 4 ft. from the line. Wait on a ball. Then....DIVE.
I love it. Brooks Robinson hardly ever left his feet according to
some people. He just plain got to the ball and threw the guy out.
Nettles was an above average 3rd bagger, just like Boggs and Gaetti.
Rich
|
28.401 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Mon Aug 06 1990 16:41 | 7 |
| �your point about robinson is well taken. however, if the o's playing
�with robinson played against the sox's with wade, i doubt that even you
�would say they were comparable infielders.
I didn't read anything where Doug said that they were. In fact, I read
that Robinson had better range which was backed up by the higher assist
numbers.
|
28.402 | For the Wade Apoligists Club | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Thank you, Fay | Tue Aug 07 1990 14:44 | 9 |
| >if two players have roughly the same number, then they
>are probably getting to the same number of groundballs, thus to say
>one has far better range than the other lacks credibility.
The statistics you presented are not inconsistent with the statement I
made, which, to paraphrase is that Gaetti is likely the best fielding
third baseman in the league for the last few years.
Dan
|
28.403 | | SASE::SZABO | | Tue Aug 07 1990 14:56 | 6 |
| Dan, I just learned over in 320 that Doug isn't really serious in what
he writes, it's all merely a form of sarcasm. You must learn not to
take Doug seriously, as I have. I'm not miserable anymore and life is
truly wonderful again.
Hawk
|
28.404 | Good start to a 9 game road trip | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 71 to go | Wed Aug 08 1990 05:47 | 10 |
| Sox win 6-3. Brunansky goes deep with a 3 run homer in the sixth
inning, I believe. Pena also hit a solo shot earlier in the game.
Boggs doubled and singled off Langston. I think I read over the
weekend he's only batting .170 against lefties on the road. He's been
on a tear for about a week now. Greenwell had 3 hits.
Bolton went the distance to improve his record to 6-1. Tonight it's
Harris vs. McCaskill.
Steve
|
28.405 | | GOOBER::ROSS | Rocket Science for $100, Alex | Wed Aug 08 1990 07:20 | 2 |
| Boggs drove in a run with a bases loaded single... making him 5 for 6 this
year in bases loaded situations with 11 RBI's.
|
28.406 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Wed Aug 08 1990 07:40 | 4 |
|
Selfish B is just padding his stats, as usual. ;-)
|
28.407 | | GOOBER::ROSS | Wilson-Phillips: Two Dog Night | Wed Aug 08 1990 07:49 | 7 |
| It's easy to see that the biggest reason the Sox are still in first place
is Tony Pena. The difference between him and the droopy-lidded, three-toed
sloth Gedman is enormous. He sets up so low, that the pitchers seem to
be keeping the ball down. He's always looking for the pickoff when guys
get on base. He doesn't worry about the helicopter swing, just hacks away.
|
28.408 | BNolton went 8 1/3 and Murphy got his 7th save. | VAXWRK::NEEDLE | Money talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!" | Wed Aug 08 1990 08:08 | 0 |
28.409 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | yanks..spoilers in sept. | Wed Aug 08 1990 08:10 | 7 |
| i have never seen a catcher that stay in that position for so long
ya think he would get real tired.. must work alot on the legs..
dinz
|
28.410 | And he's invented a new language: Spanglish | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 71 to go | Wed Aug 08 1990 08:19 | 15 |
| I've been fortunate enough to get tickets to a few games this year
7 rows behind the Sox on-deck circle. My son, who's an absolute
baseball freak and just shy of 6 years old, asked me why Pena was
laughing and smiling while taking his cuts. He thought players only
smiled after they'd hit a homer or won a game. I told him the game is
actually fun and enjoyable for Tony Pena, and to appreciate it while
Pena's still around. He's a pleasure to watch.
That, to me anyway, is the way the game was meant to be played.
It's an ongoing joke in the Sox dugout as they watch Pena catch. He
causes problems for the umpires by getting so low, as he's a form of
protection for the ump.
Steve
|
28.411 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | yanks..spoilers in sept. | Wed Aug 08 1990 08:30 | 5 |
| Do ya think Soxfans and players alike will be saying in sept..
no maas.. no maas..
|
28.412 | | CAM::WAY | Get Matt Sewell his jersey! | Wed Aug 08 1990 08:48 | 7 |
| I like what Pena brings to the game. He looks like a little
kid and he has *fun* playing.....
I read somewhere why he gets so low. I think it's a carry over
from one particular pitcher that he'd catch, but I don't remember...
'Saw
|
28.413 | Let me know ok? | SALEM::DODA | Capone,Floyd,MassPoliticians | Wed Aug 08 1990 08:53 | 6 |
| Dinz,
Will the fridge in the camper be big enough to hold all the brews
you're buying? Or should we bring coolers too?
daryll
|
28.414 | does the camper have a toilet? | COBRA::DINSMORE | yanks..spoilers in sept. | Wed Aug 08 1990 08:58 | 6 |
|
bring the coolers.. gonna be one of those weekends.. Thank god
Jimbo mcfall designated driver..
|
28.415 | | SLEDGE::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Wed Aug 08 1990 09:22 | 2 |
| I believe the story is that Pena was forced down into that "crouch"
of his by Kent Tekulve back in Pittsburgh.
|
28.416 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Wed Aug 08 1990 10:19 | 15 |
| > <<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;2 >>>
> -< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
>================================================================================
>Note 28.411 The Boston Red Sox Note 411 of 415
>COBRA::DINSMORE "yanks..spoilers in sept." 5 lines 8-AUG-1990 07:30
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Do ya think Soxfans and players alike will be saying in sept..
> no maas.. no maas..
I think you are probably right, Dins. When the Yankees start playing
contenders and teams with decent pitching, we'll see no Maas.
Bruce
|
28.417 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Aug 08 1990 10:49 | 11 |
| Re .405
I think Boggs is dogging it, only 6 trips with the bases loaded.
Says something about his range, huh?
And, he's only batting .833 in that situation this year, and hasn't
driven in 49% of the runners. What a flop!
:*)
Lee
|
28.418 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | yanks..spoilers in sept. | Wed Aug 08 1990 11:45 | 7 |
| whats this lee, you now a sox fan?? Or just part of the Wade Boggs
fan club? :)
dinz
|
28.419 | anyone heard that? | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Wed Aug 08 1990 14:49 | 7 |
| I have also read somewhere that Sandy Alomar Jr. and Santiago have
molded themselves after Pena, and all are excellent catchers.
John
|
28.420 | | CAM::WAY | Get Matt Sewell his jersey! | Wed Aug 08 1990 14:52 | 8 |
| Personally, I think that Pena was one of the best Red Sox
acquisitions in years. Ol' Gorman musta been doin' the shrooms
I sent him when he made that trade, cause it sure ain't like
the other boners he's pulled....
Go Tony Pena!
'Saw
|
28.421 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Help Jane, stop this crazy thing! | Wed Aug 08 1990 15:13 | 8 |
| re .420:
Pena didn't come to the Sox via trade, he was a free agent signing last
winter. I agree, getting Tony was one of the best moves the Sox have
made in a while.
py
|
28.422 | Thanks Paul...and how many K's did Roger have? 8^) | CAM::WAY | Get Matt Sewell his jersey! | Wed Aug 08 1990 15:16 | 7 |
| You know Paul, after I wrote that note I said to myself "Self, I think
you screwed up".
I think I must have mixed up him and Bruno, at least in how they
got to the team....
'Saw
|
28.423 | | TOPDWN::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Wed Aug 08 1990 15:19 | 8 |
|
It was almost impossible for Gorman to screw up getting Pena via free agency.
Pena basically told everybody that he wanted to play here and after that it
was simply a matter of getting the contract done (although that, in itself might
have been a way for trader Loo to screw it up )
Metz
|
28.424 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Aug 09 1990 05:28 | 8 |
| Hi dINZ. Not a Sox fan, not a member of the Boggs fan club. Just
trying to stir the pot a bit. Actually, I think that Boggs is an
above average 3b. Not the greatest, not among the next level,
but somewhere between that second tier and average.
Lee
|
28.425 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | yanks..spoilers in sept. | Thu Aug 09 1990 06:02 | 12 |
| Hes turned himself into a better average 3rd baseman..
i was lucky enough to wake up early and see replay of game and see
Parish deposit one in the stands..
Toronto wins.. this race gets decided in late september, and i
know those young Yanks will be spoilers either to sox or jays.
dinz
|
28.426 | | SALEM::DODA | Capone,Floyd,MassPoliticians | Thu Aug 09 1990 07:28 | 9 |
| Hey Dinz,
Nice article in the Tribune yesterday about how Sox fans are
getting their revenge for '78, Bucky's canned and now Lou looks
like he's gonna take the pipe out in Cincy....
I've got plenty of coolers....
daryll
|
28.427 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | yanks..spoilers in sept. | Thu Aug 09 1990 07:33 | 4 |
| well i may not be buying any, if the yanks continue winning, and
brewers losing..
|
28.428 | 1-1 road trip so far | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 69 to go | Thu Aug 09 1990 08:07 | 6 |
| The bum's on the mound tonight against Abbott. He'll take his normal
start after throwing a career high (168?) pitches on Saturday. Here's
hoping the Sox score a bunch of runs, 'cause the bullpen can't be relied
upon at present.
Steve
|
28.429 | | GOLF::KINGR | Save the EARTH, we may need it later!!! | Fri Aug 10 1990 00:12 | 13 |
| The Score is 10-2 Sox are leading in the 8th inning.. Bases loaded with
Boggs up to bat!... Will Boggs go for a selfish hit!..
Strike one...
Ball one , check swing..
Ball 2 close but not close enought!!
Boggs swings.... up the middle for a single driving in 2
its now 12-2... must have been a "park-effect hit" Right Dan?
Bluejays lost sox about to take 2 out of 3 from the ANgels and go back
to 2 games ahead of the Bluejays...
REK
|
28.430 | Clemens wins # 16. | CRBOSS::DERRY | What's that song? | Fri Aug 10 1990 05:51 | 1 |
|
|
28.431 | Rag arm | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 67 to go | Fri Aug 10 1990 07:51 | 9 |
| Had to put this somewhere. While watching last night's game against
Seattle, I believe I witnessed the weakest throwing arm of any major
league ball player. Luis (?) Polonia. Greenwell flyed to short, short
left field with Ellis Burkes on third. Having never observed Polonia's
throwing arm I was kind of shocked Burkes was tagging. The throw was
up the first base line, but even if it were on the money Burkes would
have beaten it easily.
Steve
|
28.432 | Polonia=="Rubber band" | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Fri Aug 10 1990 09:16 | 7 |
|
That was quite a lame throw by Polonia! Small nit Steve it was
California not Seattle! 8^) Sox are hitting well as a team.
Steve
|
28.433 | Rag Arm Poster Boy | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 67 to go | Fri Aug 10 1990 09:41 | 4 |
| Thanks for pointing that out, Steve. I must have entered a time warp
and got a day ahead of myself.
Steve
|
28.434 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Phase I ended, 100% delivered!!!! | Fri Aug 10 1990 10:14 | 16 |
| re .429
Notes like that crack me up. Imagine if Jim Rice did that, he'd
be railed against as only getting hits when it doesn't matter.
I've taken part in the Clemens and Boggs debates - I don't like
either, but I do acknowledge their talents. CLemens as a damn good
pitcher, Boggs as a damn good hitter. IMO, however, both are the
types that won't lead a team to victory when it matters. Boggs
especially.
I guess it comes from being a Sox and a Mets fan. I know that if
Boggs and Clemens played for the Mets, many of the Sox fans/diety
builders would be saying they were just products of New York hype.
JD
|
28.435 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Fri Aug 10 1990 12:02 | 5 |
| JD's right. I would much rather have Doc Gooden's team oriented
E.R.A of almost 4.xx than Roger's selfish E.R.A. of almost under
2.xx. Congrats JD!
/Don
|
28.436 | 1918 | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Phase I ended, 100% delivered!!!! | Fri Aug 10 1990 12:11 | 12 |
| /Don,
How many World Champeenships have the mighty individualistic Sox
won in the last 25 years???
I'd rather see a champeenship flag flying over center field than
a bunch of individual trophies in someone's living room.
HTH
JD
|
28.437 | JD, go get yourself an iced tea and calm down. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Fri Aug 10 1990 12:36 | 1 |
|
|
28.438 | | SALEM::DODA | Capone,Floyd,MassPoliticians | Fri Aug 10 1990 15:10 | 1 |
| I am not a number, I am a Red Sox player?
|
28.439 | | CAM::WAY | Down on Brickyard Road | Sat Aug 11 1990 11:10 | 9 |
| The Red Sox will eventually put it together and become
a champion. Of this I have no doubt. And, believe it
or not I think it will be in my life time.
And folks, when that day comes, look out, because Freakin'
Lunatic wouldn't come close to describing a buzzin' Chainsaw
that day.....
'Saw
|
28.440 | Sox beat M's 7-2. Go up by 3. | CRBOSS::DERRY | What's that song? | Mon Aug 13 1990 06:32 | 1 |
| Nice to see the shaving cream and coke cups Saturday night...
|
28.441 | | GOLF::KINGR | Save the EARTH, we may need it later!!! | Mon Aug 13 1990 07:04 | 3 |
| I was watching channel 56 last night... The rally stuff was great!!!!
REK
|
28.442 | Maybe Noxema will buy the Red Sox | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | GeorgeForeman-NextHEAVYweightChamp | Mon Aug 13 1990 07:29 | 1 |
|
|
28.443 | point shaving scandal to follow | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Mon Aug 13 1990 09:26 | 4 |
| �Maybe Noxema will buy the Red Sox
And get some kind of cooperative crossover deal going with Victor
Kiam's Patriots...
|
28.444 | basesball *is* a game! | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Mon Aug 13 1990 10:08 | 13 |
| I think that it's great that two teams can have so much *fun* playing
the game. I thought the Arab shieks in the Seattle dugout was pretty
funny too, then they all changed to Zorro masks, but the shaving cream
and the coke cans for ears took the cake. Clemens looked like something
from outer space.
The Red Sox have to be the team leader in practical jokes. A few weeks
back they actually were doing some kind of voodoo or something, setting
up a shrine and sacrificing a rubber chicken. Did anyone catch that
one?
John
|
28.445 | | FSHQA1::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Mon Aug 13 1990 10:41 | 38 |
| There is only one way to figure out fielding by position and by park
effects. Take the number of assists and putouts made at each position,
calculate the average and then figure out how many above and below the
average each position is. Then, do it by ballpark to get rid of the
park effect. It won't be the absolute answer but it will be close.
One of the things I've been doing recently is rereading a lot of the
work done by Bill James and so forth. I'll admit that James has come
up with a lot of meaningless numbers but one thing he doesn't do
(unlike some others, who miss the point) is think a ballplayer can be
evaluated purely on the numbers. There is a human factor there that
can't be quantified. As kind of a protest to what he has done, he has
gotten out of the statistics part of the writing and is now
concentrating on other areas. If you can ignore the numbers part of it
the man is a pretty darn good writer.
I think his most positive contributions have been first, to approach
baseball with an open mind. There are many myths that have been handed
down through the generations that needed someone to look at them
objectively. SABR first, and then James, have done that. (SABR btw is
not just about statistics - it researches history and other important
aspects of the game). The other thing has been to try to come up with
ways of measuring baseball players and how their offensive and
defensive stats contribute to a team's winning because unlike ERA and
winning pct for a pitcher, there's nothing in baseball that measures
these things directly. I know there's a lot of you who'll disagree
with me on this, but I think such a measure is helpful. I will admit
that it's not a be-all, end-all. We argue all the time about how much
Wade Boggs actually contributes to how the Red Sox do, and then when
someone tries to quantify it, the person who comes up with the system
for attempting to do so gets bashed. There's an inconsistency here
someplace.
People who rely on pure numbers miss the point. James admits this.
Don't blame him.
John
|
28.446 | Clemens wins 17th. Shuts out A's 2 zip. | CRBOSS::DERRY | Ain't no connoisseur.... | Wed Aug 15 1990 05:40 | 1 |
|
|
28.447 | Clemens 3rd shutout in 4 games. | CRBOSS::DERRY | no waitress in the sky... | Wed Aug 15 1990 05:44 | 1 |
|
|
28.448 | more on Rog | CRBOSS::DERRY | no waitress in the sky... | Wed Aug 15 1990 05:48 | 6 |
| Got his first ever? win in Oakland. 11k and 1 walk. Lowered his
era to 2.06
Canseco and Ricky didn't play. McGwire got the night off (he sips
against Clemens)
|
28.449 | | GOOBER::ROSS | Yup | Wed Aug 15 1990 07:15 | 19 |
| Clemens was in complete control of the game until the ninth inning. He
then gave up a walk and a hit by Felix Jose. Not having a Dennis Eckersley
to turn to, Clemens had to gut it out. He got Dave Henderson to fly out
to deep center and then after getting behind 3-0 to Terry Steinbach, worked
the count back to 3-2 before dropping down almost sidearm on his last pitch
to get Steinbach to pop out to 2B.
Chris Berman of ESPN had an "exclusive" interview with Roger and some
interesting things came out:
On his refusal to talk to the press: He said he felt like he had been
burned by the Boston media, saying that he had allowed many of them into
his home in the early days and they turned around and blasted him later
on when he complained about the less-than-major-league conditions around
Fenway.
On this year: He was quoted as saying that he and the rest of the team are
trying to win this year for Evans, knowing that he won't get many more
chances to do so.
|
28.450 | 3rd shutout in 5 games Karen, but who's counting? 8^) | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!! | Wed Aug 15 1990 07:16 | 1 |
|
|
28.451 | | GOOBER::ROSS | Yup | Wed Aug 15 1990 07:17 | 3 |
| Anyone think the Sox would be near first place if they had Rice, Stanley,
Smithson, and Price around this year? I think not. The best thing Joe
Morgan did was rid the team of those guys.
|
28.452 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Is Nothing Sacred? | Wed Aug 15 1990 08:21 | 9 |
|
SIGN ROGER NOW!!!! Don't wait till next year!!!
Course, he just might up and leave anyway, even if the Sox offer
him something equilavent to the S & L bailout, and throw in Quincy
Market and Martha's Vineyard to boot.
Dickster
|
28.453 | yea, the sox relievers are just kicking some but | ASABET::CORBETT | Mike Corbett - 223-9889 | Wed Aug 15 1990 08:47 | 19 |
|
Rice probably wouldn't have helped any but with the bulpen the way it
is now would Stanley or Smithson have hurt any? They certainly couldn't have
done much worse then who is/has been in the middle relief.
Take a look -
Lamp 77 ip 4.09 era
Gray 28 5.08
Murphy 48 6.33
Hesketh 4 6.75
irvine 3 9.00
Reed ? ? so bad he was released
I think they would have been better off with Stanley and Smithson
over Gray/Reed/hesketh/Irvine.
mc
|
28.454 | How do you spell R-E-L-I-E-F? N-O-T R-E-D S-O-X! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!! | Wed Aug 15 1990 09:05 | 1 |
|
|
28.455 | | CAM::WAY | Take Five | Wed Aug 15 1990 09:08 | 12 |
| I'm sure I'm exagerating, but I cannot remember a time when the
Red Sox ever had a good bullpen.
I guess you'd have to go back to 1968 time frame...I remember
Sparky Lyle and Lee Stang, but I don't know if they were considered
great relievers (I had only watched baseball for two seasons at that
point)...
Maybe Santa Claus will bring us Sox fans a good bullpen for the next
season......
'Saw
|
28.456 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Wed Aug 15 1990 09:09 | 4 |
|
Stanley had his days Saw....
but Dick Radtz was the man....
|
28.457 | Clemens going for #3! | CRUISE::JBONIN | John Bonin, U.S. Data Warehouse DBA | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:04 | 8 |
| If the season ended today, Clemens would be an *easy* shoe-in for his
3rd Cy Young award.
Go Roger!
John
|
28.458 | the pen: no arms, no rakes | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:17 | 13 |
| RE: the pen
I hardly think Darryl Irvine can be judged on 3 IPs. In fact, I
believe that one of those innings came very early in the year before he
was sent back to Pawtucket - where he should've started the year anyway.
Gray's been up and down. Put a fork in Hesketh. Lamp? (sigh)
Mike Smithson might've been a decent addition to the pen. He did
okay last year, winning some key games and can start or work out of the
pen. However, he probably would've been used as a spot starter and we
never would've found about the new improved Tom Bolton.
|
28.459 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | go tigers! | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:23 | 2 |
| easy shoo in?? naw, dont think so..
|
28.460 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:26 | 1 |
| Dins, why don't you bet someone on it? 8^)
|
28.461 | | GOOBER::ROSS | Yup | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:36 | 27 |
| There's too many starts left to give the award to Clemens yet... It's
a five man race, and each probably has 9 or 10 more starts before the
season ends.
The five candidates are:
Welch, Clemens, Stewart, Stieb, and Chuck Finley where the
last three are on the outer edge.
Finley is about 100-1, unless he finishes up with about 7 more wins,
and leads the league in e.r.a. while the other four finish badly.
Stieb is about 25-1, unless Toronto wins the East and he finishes with 20 wins,
then he'd be about 10-1
Stewart is about 5-1, if he wins more than 20 and Welch and Clemens fade.
Clemens and Welch are even money right now. If Clemens wins 22 or more
and holds onto the e.r.a title, and the Sox win the East, then I'd call
him the favorite... unless Welch wins 25+ and gets his e.r.a under 3.
If Clemens does win, we all know it'll be because of the Boston media
juggernaut that shapes the collective sporting minds of the nation.
Actually, if it's a close race between Welch and Clemens, I wonder if
any of the local writers will have the guts to pick Welch over Clemens.
|
28.462 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Nice sandcastle.... | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:37 | 6 |
| Clemens would probably win it, but shoo=in, to me, means no comp,
by a landslide. I think that if the season ended RIGHT now, as
Mr. bonin said, that Mr. Welch would garner a hell of a lot of votes.
No landslide victories in the Cy Young awards this year.
JD
|
28.463 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Wed Aug 15 1990 10:54 | 1 |
| Hekseth....another Gorman Folly....
|
28.464 | Barely a whisper about this | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Thank you, Fay | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:00 | 8 |
| >Hekseth....another Gorman Folly....
I read over the weekend that Roger McDowell was one of those that
cleared waivers, and in response to that, Gorman said "We are not
interested in McDowell."! If I was a Red Sox fan, I'd take Lou out
back and shoot him.
Dan
|
28.465 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:02 | 5 |
|
What about Eck? Sub 1.00 ERA and blowing out the record for most saves
in a season ought to be worth some consideration.
Bruce
|
28.466 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Nice sandcastle.... | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:28 | 13 |
| Bruce,
The Eck deserve mention, but I think a starter will get it this
year.
Dan - why would the Phillies put McDowell on waivers, and no one
claim him? I know they did it to test the waters, but I caint believe
teams like the BoSox didn't at least go through the motions and
claim him. Geez, the guy is better than anything they have right
now, that for sure. But then again, Pat Clements is better than
anything the have right now.
JD
|
28.467 | 3ip = nadda, your right | ASABET::CORBETT | Mike Corbett - 223-9889 | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:33 | 7 |
|
I wasn't trying to say Irvine is a stiff (though he might be) it's
just with what the sox have had in the pen all year, I don't see how Smithson
or Stanley could do much worse.
mc
|
28.468 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!! | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:34 | 6 |
| John Wyatt had a good year in '67. 8^) Stewart has 16 wins,
possibly 17 after today and his E.R.A in the last three starts is
0.00. I consider him along with Clemens and Welch to be a strong
contender.
/Don
|
28.469 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Here's where the story ends | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:36 | 4 |
| If Boston had a bullpen, Clemens would be 20-3 at this point. Reardon
blew at least 3 games that he inherited from Clemens with the lead.
Mark.
|
28.470 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:38 | 2 |
| If Clemens didn't have to play Oakland (which Welch doesn't) he'd hav e
two less losses.
|
28.471 | just when you thought he'd drop it | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:42 | 9 |
|
yeah and if umps called real strike zones he'd have 5 more losses so take
the supposed victories he lost and balance them against this and you see
he's right about where he belongs in victories but well below what his
era should be....
;^)
mike
|
28.472 | | GOOBER::ROSS | Yakkity, yak...bomb Iraq | Wed Aug 15 1990 11:45 | 8 |
| The reason I left Eckersley off the contenders list is because normally
the only way a reliever gets consideration for Cy Young is if there is
no real dominant starting pitcher.
It should be interesting if Stewart, Welch, and Clemens end up with
nearly identical records. Clemens may pull it out simply because the
West Coasy writers will probably split between Stewart and Welch for
first, with Clemens getting seconds.
|
28.473 | Stew is 6-0 lifetime vs. Rog !!!!! YES YES YES !!! | EARRTH::BROOKS | Dowhatchalike, NoteHowYaLike .... | Wed Aug 15 1990 13:48 | 4 |
| re .470
And if Stewart go to go against Clemens more than twice, he'd have at
least 3 more wins ....
|
28.474 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Aug 15 1990 14:52 | 44 |
| 'Saw,
From some of the things you write I'd guess you and I are about the
same age - hence I am left wondering why you can't remember when the
Sox had a good pen.
As someone pointed out, there was Dick Radatz and that sage, /Don,
recalled the work of Johnny Wyatt (although Wyatt is better known for
getting hit in the head when Bob Tillman tried to throw out a runner at
2nd).
But let us not forget the original Red Sox reliever, Ellis Kinder. Then
there was Mike Fornieles. How about Jim Willoughby and Dick Drago. We
also had a monster of a guy named Bob Veale and then there was the guy
that Zimmer burned up, Bill Campbell. Tom Burgmier was a decent middle
man - probably one of the better the Sox had.
People laugh but, in his prime, Bob Stanley was one of the best middle
men-turned-closer the Sox ever had. I also recall a lefty by the name
of Arnold Early who had a decnt year or two.
The Sox have had their share of good relievers. This years middle
relievers and the lack of a closer make it a glaring weakness.
But, given the past propensity of Sox management to sell the farm for
aging veterans (Juan Marichal, Dick Ellsworth, etc) I give credit to
Gorman for trying to develop (FINALLY!) some homegrown talent while
seeing if there are any bargains to be had for nothing. Remember, Lamp,
Sambito, etc came here and contributed and we paid next to nothing for
them.
However, the Reggie Harris story is one that riles me and is
indicative, perhaps, of why the Mets, Dodgers and Orioles can
continually develop good young pitchers and the Sox get so few. There
is no development in the farm system of the Red Sox. We let a great
talent like Harris rot down there and Oakland, with Dave Duncan, Tony
LaRussa, Dave Stewert and others out there have worked with the guy to
the point where he can pitch in the majors. The Sox? They do the same
thing with John Trautwine and let him sit on the bench.
Rich
|
28.475 | Jim Burton :-) | SALEM::DODA | Holy War! Batman | Wed Aug 15 1990 15:13 | 0 |
28.476 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Wed Aug 15 1990 15:46 | 13 |
| Rich --
I'm 31 (be 32 next month), I started watching the Sox in 1966, but
didn't develop the savvy to be a real fan until probably 68 or so.
Some of the names you mention ring a bell...Drago especially.
I just couldn't come up with a bunch of consistent names over a
period of time. I'd forgetten about Campbell too...
Oh well.....
'Saw
|
28.477 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Nice sandcastle.... | Wed Aug 15 1990 16:11 | 6 |
| Saw,
Ain't no way you are 31. I'm 31 and you are at least 25 years older
than me. That's a fack.
JD
|
28.478 | way to go Murp... | CNTROL::CHILDS | No One Here gets Out Alive | Thu Aug 16 1990 05:52 | 11 |
|
Think Lou's on the phone to McDowell today?
how about those announcers are they prophets of doom or what?
"Well McGuire's the kind of guy you can make look bad all day then
all of sudden bang with 1 swing he kills ya"....
inning number 8 they came out with that gem....
mike
|
28.479 | jmyo | COBRA::DINSMORE | go tigers! | Thu Aug 16 1990 06:33 | 8 |
| mcguire stinks lifetime against clemens, but not murphy..
A lack of bull pen will cost the sox in october
dinz
|
28.480 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!! | Thu Aug 16 1990 06:51 | 13 |
| While Irvine's pitches were swervin',
Rivera made an error.
Then bonehaid Joe the game did blow,
When he brought in Murph the derf.
Because Rob threw up a lob,
That Mark hit out of the park.
But the Sox are still in first,
In the division that is the worst.
/Don
|
28.481 | Toronto win? | CRBOSS::DERRY | no waitress in the sky... | Thu Aug 16 1990 06:58 | 1 |
|
|
28.482 | 5 BLACK.. | COBRA::DINSMORE | go tigers! | Thu Aug 16 1990 07:03 | 5 |
| toronto will win the division... they lost to chicago
KOD FINALLY GETS PUT TO REST!
|
28.483 | | CBROWN::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Aug 16 1990 10:37 | 8 |
| BS, put to death! Look what you've done to the Tigers!!!
We/re having a tough year, but you're making it worse!!
Change that damn P-name, will ya?
Lee
|
28.484 | could have called St. Louis and tried to get Lee in the game. | ASABET::CORBETT | Mike Corbett - 223-9889 | Thu Aug 16 1990 10:59 | 18 |
| >
> Then bonehaid Joe the game did blow,
When he brought in Murph the derf.
I don't know if you were serious don but others have also blamed
morgan for the loss and i don't think its right. He made the right move.
He couldn't leave Irvine in. The kid couldn't find the plate, balked, and
threw a wild pitch. he's also a rookie. No way would I have left him in.
He realy needed a K. Although he went against the percentages I think bringing
Murphy in was almost his only choice. Murphy is a K, pitcher and a has
experience. The only other option (that makes sense to me) was to bring in
Gardner. Seeing Wes hasn't pitched in awhile I can see why he didn't do that.
With the bulpen the way it is his hands were tied and he made the best move he
could.
Mc
|
28.485 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Go Brewers! I'm getting thirsty!! | Thu Aug 16 1990 11:09 | 5 |
| I saw the replay of the game on NESN last night Mike, and I
agree Irvine had to come out. Hell, he almost threw the intentional
ball four past the catcher, but Murphy? I dunno about that one.
/Don
|
28.486 | | CBROWN::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Aug 16 1990 11:09 | 5 |
| Right and wrong, Mike. Wrong, I ain't in St. Louis, but right,
I can throw as well as Murphy. Hell, Murphy's so bad, even my Tigers
would't use him.
Lee
|
28.487 | | CAM::WAY | I wanna be an Airborne Ranger... | Thu Aug 16 1990 12:29 | 7 |
| Morgan had no choice. He simply had to choose which poison
he was going to die by.
Murphy is a stiff. Plain and simple. The guy makes me wanna puke
every time they bring him in....
The Caterer...serving up those homerun meatballs....
|
28.488 | Murphy's Law | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 62 to go | Fri Aug 17 1990 11:32 | 5 |
| How can the guy go downhill so quickly? Is he burnt out from pitching
so often over the years? One stinkin' pitch and Apollo lifts off.
What a shot by McGuire.
Steve
|
28.489 | Is Rocketman on for the weekend?? | CURIE::WENTZELL | I will get by | Fri Aug 17 1990 11:42 | 12 |
| Is Clemons still slated to go on Sunday??
RE: Murphy
I too have been wondering why he has been so hot and [mostly] cold this season.
I try to watch the quality of his pitches, and although I by no means any kind
of expert, he doesn't look all that bad. Yet he still has an ERA in the 6
range (probobly a few 10ths higher after McGwires moon shot) and is still
sliding. Did he show promise last year or was I in another universe (entirely
possible ;^))???????
Scott
|
28.490 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Help Jane, stop this crazy thing! | Fri Aug 17 1990 12:01 | 12 |
| re .488, .489 on Murphy:
It's certainly plausible that after being among the league leaders in
appearances the last few years, Murphy may be just plain burnt out.
Will a winter's rest help? Who knows?
> Is Clemons still slated to go on Sunday??
I hope so, that way my O's will miss him... :-)
py
|
28.491 | 6 on the Richter scale and climbing! | CAM::WAY | 1/2000 @ f2 | Fri Aug 17 1990 12:52 | 9 |
| Regardless of whether he was ever hot, The Caterer(tm) is serving
up cold meatballs these days. With Reardon out, perhaps Gorman
should get a life, get a brain, (get a new job - oh please oh please)
and find someone capable of closing.
They can send the Caterer into the RF bleachers, since we could use
a few more hot dog vendors in that neck of the woods....
'Saw
|
28.492 | Murph - stop selling stud tickets and pitch! | MPO::GILBERT | Is it Soucy,Goggin,Marggraf,or Upson | Fri Aug 17 1990 15:55 | 4 |
|
Those who should know say that Murphy is spending too much time
with his "other" business interests (Horse breeding) and is not
concentrating on the game. Seems sort of logical to me.
|
28.493 | | CAM::WAY | Zuiko 250mm, 1/2000 @f2 | Fri Aug 17 1990 16:30 | 14 |
| > Those who should know say that Murphy is spending too much time
> with his "other" business interests (Horse breeding) and is not
> concentrating on the game. Seems sort of logical to me.
I stand corrected.
Let me rephrase my observations:
Rob "The Caterer" Murphy should be put in the RF bleachers
because he keeps serving up cold horsemeat balls to
opposing hitters.....
Thanks for the help,
Chainsaw
|
28.494 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Tue Aug 21 1990 15:10 | 31 |
| What do we all think Gorman should do? If there were any REAL bona fide
closers on the market at this point, they would have been scoffed up.
If Dave Smith is the best out there right now, I'd rather not risk it.
And that's the real word..RISK. The trading deadline is over so Gorman
cannot engineer a trade. He has to see what clears waivers. And a real
closer would NOT clear waivers.
So, rather than risk some future phenom on a used up closer, he's
risking the race on kids like Gray and Irvine from Pawtucket. I
actually think he's doing the right thing, at this point.
My problem with Gorman is that he waited too long after it was
reasonably certain that Raerdon had serious back problems. He should
have been dealing back in June or around the All Star game. So, given
the fact that he bothced that opportunity, I agree with his agenda now.
No comments on Marshall and Plantier? I was sort of sad to see
Lancelotti sent back down but he just didn't produce given a chance.
The guy is a career minor leaguer and had probably this one last chance
to play out a meaningful year in "The Show".
I would really like to see Plantier used as a pinch hitter alot down
the stretch. I watched him alot at Pawtucket and, although he probably
won't meet the expectations of the Kevin Maas Adoration Society (tm),
the kid has raw power from the left side. In September, enjoy Mo
Vaughn. That guy is something to see. Carlos may well be the bait
we will use for pitching over the winter.
Rich
|
28.495 | Big series coming up with the Jays | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 57 to go | Tue Aug 21 1990 17:38 | 14 |
| As you stated, Rich, there's not much they can do about the relief
pitching at this point. Gorman doesn't have a hair trigger when pulling
the finger on trades, but I'm sure they probably expected Murphy to come
around by the time the trading deadline passed. I know I did.
I'm anxious to see Plantier. From what little I've seen of him, it
looks like he's got a quick bat. How is he in the field? I've heard
someone say he'll make Greenwell look like a Gold Glover.
Marshall was probably gotten as an insurance policy, which I have no
problem with. Dewey's back is uncertain and Brunansky is in a severe
power slump (and may be hightailing it via free agency).
Steve
|
28.496 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Aug 22 1990 07:07 | 22 |
| Steve, I've seen Plantier in Pawtucket and he isn't the second coming
of Paul Blair in the OF. However, I've never been very fond of
Greenwell as a fielder and I think they are about equal.
Methinks Dennis Lamp will be gone after this season. For a guy who was
aquired for next to nothing, he has been a good solid member of the Sox
bullpen for a few years but, alas, has lost it.
Don't be fooled by Hesketh last night. The Orioles must have been tired
from running the bases so much.
If Kiecker doesn't turn it around in his next 2 starts, the Sox should
go to a 4 man rotation for September.
Evans may be gone for the season. With Brunansky, Burks, Greenwell,
Plantier, Marshall and Romine around for OF duty and with Mo Vaughn on
the way up from Pawtucket, he may feel it's time to get that back taken
care of. Look for Kutcher to be brought up before Sept 1. I sure hope
so, anyway.
Rich
|
28.497 | | FRSBEE::BROOKS | A radical thinker on a musical level | Wed Aug 22 1990 07:32 | 5 |
| re .494
Rich "Sir" Lancellotti had what 4 at bats ???
Not much of a 'chance' if you ask me Rich ....
|
28.498 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Free Case of Sammy's for the trip | Wed Aug 22 1990 10:37 | 6 |
| Hey Rich, maybe if Gorman had told Bonehaid Morgan to kiss and
make up with Lee Smith the Sox would be looking real good right
now. Seems like Boston's the only place where Lee was a
*troublemaker*. Makes you wonder.
/Don
|
28.499 | Tigermania three years ago... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Homey, don't do that game | Wed Aug 22 1990 10:49 | 6 |
|
Cmon Don, why lay it at Morgan's feet? How many times was good ole like
adding gas to the fire? After signing Reardon to such an amount when they
already had Lee they had to obstucate something now didn't they...
mike
|
28.500 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Free Case of Sammy's for the trip | Wed Aug 22 1990 11:02 | 4 |
| If Morgan got along with Smith they never would've had to sign
Reardon.
/Don
|
28.501 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Aug 22 1990 12:10 | 29 |
| No question, in hindsight, the Sox made an error with Lee Smith. There
aren't many guys who can get you 30 saves a year and Smith was one of
them. So, is Reardon.
Problem was, both Smith and Reardon let it be known that niether of
them would be satisfied as a set-up guy. So we have to go back and
figure out why the Sox signed Reardon in the first place.
In my opinion, ever since Smith got stuck on the shitter in Toronto,
his days were numbered with the Sox. When Reardon was signed, the Sox
had no intention of keeping Smith. This has nothing to do with Morgan
although he is, for all intents, a bonehead.
The Sox felt that Smith was worth a lot more than hea actually was. He
had faded a bit in the last year or 2 and there were bona fide
questions about his knees, back and heart. Admittedly, he usally got
the job done but damned if he didn't take you on a roller coaster ride.
His typical line score was:
IP R ER H BB SO
Smith (S25) 1 0 0 2 1 2
So, if Reardon had been healthy this year and did as expected, we
wouldn't hear about Smith. But because the unexpected happened and
Reardon came down with a bad back, the Sox are held up for ridicule.
Sorry, but I think I would have done the same deal over again.
Rich
|
28.502 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 22 1990 12:21 | 5 |
| No way, Rich. Smith is younger than Reardan and Reardon has more of
a history of injury than Smith.
Hindsight, nothing. I said they made a mistake the day the signed
Reardon.
|
28.503 | | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Wed Aug 22 1990 12:30 | 11 |
| I respect your view, Mac, but you haven't been away that long to forget
the many instances when Smith begged out of the bullpen claiming his
knees and/or back hurt. I'm not saying Smith was faking but the fact is
that Smith is not a clean bill of health either.
Add to that the fact that Smith was cahstised for arriving to camp
every year out of shape and it wasn't really the dumbest move some make
it out to be.
Rich
|
28.504 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 22 1990 12:54 | 11 |
| I don't know Rich. Although some of his outings have been adventurous,
you don't pile up his kind of stats by begging out of games and
pitching lousy.
I think people have been skeptical of Smith despite the fact that he
came through for the Sox because noone wants to believe that the Sox
actually could get a pitcher of his caliber for Schiraldi and Nipper.
People were saying that there must be something wrong with him for the
Cubs to take the Sox excess baggage. He then pitched poorly in the
Fenway opener, and I think that is what a great deal of Sox fans
remember.
|
28.505 | Sox up 11-2. Don't know what inning... | CRBOSS::DERRY | no waitress in the sky... | Wed Aug 22 1990 13:58 | 1 |
|
|
28.506 | Now 13-2 after 8 | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 22 1990 14:03 | 1 |
|
|
28.507 | think the pen will blow it? | COBRA::DINSMORE | IMTAPMA | Wed Aug 22 1990 14:18 | 1 |
|
|
28.508 | | 15436::LEFEBVRE | Let's tear this damned place up! | Wed Aug 22 1990 14:20 | 3 |
| Dins, how's the view from the cellar?
Mark.
|
28.509 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | IMTAPMA | Wed Aug 22 1990 14:31 | 5 |
| the view could change very soon marcus..
dinz
|
28.510 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Aug 22 1990 14:50 | 1 |
| Why dinz? You jumpin' on the Sox band wagon?
|
28.511 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | IMTAPMA | Wed Aug 22 1990 15:00 | 2 |
| NOPE, yanks wont be in celler much longer
|
28.512 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Free Case of Sammy's for the trip | Thu Aug 23 1990 09:21 | 4 |
| But they'll be there Friday. Put the beer on ice tonight would
you Dinz?
/Don
|
28.513 | Is a 4 game lead enough? | CRBOSS::DERRY | Skankin' to the beat... | Mon Aug 27 1990 05:47 | 3 |
| Sox take 3 of 4 from Jays... Shut them out 2-0, 1-0 and 1-0...
Harris is 11-5. Bolton is 7-2. Do the fans dare get comfortable?
I keep waiting for that wrench...
|
28.514 | Hoping Against Hope | LUNER::BRAKE | A Question of Balance | Mon Aug 27 1990 07:07 | 12 |
| Although this may sound strange after what just happened, the Sox'
pitching, lack of speed and power and shortstop make them iffy even to
win the East. The things they have going for them are a good attitude,
Roger Clemens and the Toronto Blue Jays. I seriously doubt the Tigers,
Orioles or Indians has the horses to make up 10 games in a month. But
the Jays could catch the Sox if just one cylinder misfires at Fenway.
Harris and Gray are pleasant surprises. Kiecker is an anomoly. Of all
the Red Sox teams I've followed, this really is the weakest since 1966.
Rich
|
28.515 | The World Series jinx will be broken this year! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dinz welches again! | Tue Aug 28 1990 14:37 | 1 |
|
|
28.516 | Dinz must have money on the A's... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Bart Gimble,Jerry Hubbard,Happy Kine | Tue Aug 28 1990 15:04 | 5 |
| <<< Note 28.515 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Dinz welches again!" >>>
-< The World Series jinx will be broken this year! >-
|
28.517 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Erect it and he will come | Tue Aug 28 1990 15:07 | 8 |
|
> -< The World Series jinx will be broken this year! >-
Why? Do you *really* think the Cubs have much of a chance at this
point? ;^)
Dickster
|
28.518 | Sox 6 up on Jays. 7 in loss column. | CRBOSS::DERRY | Skankin' to the beat... | Wed Aug 29 1990 07:07 | 1 |
|
|
28.519 | /Nostradamus told it to me in a dream... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dinz welches again! | Wed Aug 29 1990 11:27 | 1 |
|
|
28.520 | My P-name says it all... | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | Red> Sox 1990 W.S. Champs | Thu Aug 30 1990 08:46 | 1 |
|
|
28.521 | Fat chance on WS in Beanburg | FMCSSE::BROWN | BombBombBomb,BombBomb Iraq | Thu Aug 30 1990 08:55 | 6 |
|
Get real you guys! The DRed Skunks(tm) will never get past the A's. In
fact they still have chance to blow it(As per the norm) before the ALCS
even starts.
Cadzilla
|
28.522 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Boston Red Sox, World Champions 1990 | Thu Aug 30 1990 10:12 | 9 |
|
-1
No they won't. The bombing of Iraq and the Sox winning the series
are listed in the Book of Revelation as signaling the end of the
world. At least the Sox fans will go out smiling.
Dickster
|
28.523 | | CAM::WAY | Jimi and Stevie Ray, jammin' on... | Thu Aug 30 1990 10:21 | 9 |
| And behold, the Seventh Seal was opened, and out rode the
Four Horsemen of the Boston Red Sox.
I have more faith in the Sox getting by Oakland this season than
in the past. We'll have to see, but if they do get by Oakland,
I think they could win the series...I really do....
'Saw
|
28.524 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dinz welches again! | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:22 | 4 |
| Dickster, I thought the final two signs were the Red Sox winning
a World Series and Dinsmore actually paying off a bet.
/Don
|
28.525 | | UPWARD::HEISER | from Colorado Springs | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:28 | 4 |
| At least the Sox are actually beating Oakland this year! Aren't they
undefeated against the A's at home?
Mike
|
28.526 | Don't think so Mike. Clemens lost to Stewart at home. | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dinz welches again! | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:29 | 1 |
|
|
28.527 | Sorry, but its wait 'til next year - again! | AKOV06::DCARR | Just call me Carr-nac | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:30 | 26 |
| Fat chance that ANY team will beat Oakland this year, after their
acquiring Baines and McGee... A lineup of
Henderson
McGee
Canseco
Baines
McGwire
Lansford
or thereabouts, is just too strong, with their pitching...
What really pisses me off is
(1) how the !@#$ did Felix Jose ever clear waivers? (If you are Sox
GM, and that name shows up, how many seconds pass before you
claim him? I mean, you KNOW that he's not going to be waived,
but is about to be traded... Unbelievably stupid move by the
incompetent Sox administration
(2) Why can't we ever pull deals like this, Loo?
I was optomistic until hearing about those acquisitions this morning,
now, I wouldn't bet against another sweep.
ML
|
28.528 | Believe it when I see it but it's fun now! | CRBOSS::DERRY | Coming soon to HLO....again | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:38 | 8 |
| Scene: It's a beautiful summer day, in the park. There's a bench with
a bat leaning against it. A guy wearing a Red Sox uniform, is sitting
on the bench. His arm is around his favourite girl.
Guy : "Trust me baby. I'll never break your heart again!"
Girl: "Honey, I believe you.... again."
|
28.529 | | UPWARD::HEISER | from Colorado Springs | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:39 | 8 |
| Late season trades in baseball don't seem to affect team chemistry
as in other sports, but here's hoping it affects Oakland.
What I mean is that other sports (i.e., basketball) seem to benefit
more from team play than in baseball. A single individual can do more
damage in baseball (IMHO).
Mike
|
28.530 | Hope I'm wrong but... | DOCTP::TESSIER | Istanbul or Constantinople | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:40 | 10 |
| ML is right. Expect another ALCS sweep. Three of the four games
will be close with good pitching by both sides. Difference being
that the Sox won't score diddly against Eck, while the A's will
have a field day against the Sox bullpen in the late innings. As
for Clemens, it will be pretty much a repeat of '88. He'll pitch
well into the late innings but will get no support. Probably
lose on a mistake to Canseco or Henderson. Stewart will make
Boggs and company look foolish.
Laker_Ken
|
28.531 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Nostra/DONus | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:49 | 4 |
| Hey Karen, I still got that cartoon in my office, right on top
of the Morgan's Miracle handkerchief. 8^)
/Don
|
28.532 | Roger!Roger! | CRBOSS::DERRY | Coming soon to HLO....again | Thu Aug 30 1990 11:56 | 5 |
| I've got it right next to all my pictures of God. Mikey, I could
copy some of those for ya. Nice article in today's Globe about him,
too. Let me know.
(-:
|
28.533 | | CAM::WAY | Jimi and Stevie Ray, jammin' on... | Thu Aug 30 1990 12:16 | 15 |
| re the cartoon:
Actually, the way the Sox screwed us in 1986, you could have
the guy saying "Really, honey, this time it is just a
cold sore....Trust me!"
re Gorman:
I'm sorry. Maybe I'm a tad bit uninformed, and maybe I don't
have all the dastisticks etc, but I think Lou Gorman is clueless.
I also think the Sox have no chance to ever win with that
guy in there....
'Saw
|
28.534 | | FSHQA2::AWASKOM | | Thu Aug 30 1990 12:17 | 7 |
| I have it on good authority that the end of the world occurs during the
9th inning of the 7th game of the World Series between the Red Sox and
the Cubs.
So it won't be for a while yet.
A&W
|
28.535 | | CAM::WAY | Jimi and Stevie Ray, jammin' on... | Thu Aug 30 1990 12:19 | 7 |
| Yeah, and the box score the next day in Heaven reads
Chic vs Bos ppd Armageddon
'Saw
|
28.536 | | FREE::GOGUEN | Boggs watch: 33 games, 46 hits | Thu Aug 30 1990 15:02 | 12 |
| Amazing, you guys sure know your Revelation (or parts of it). Ever
consider taking it seriously?? :-) And not in relation to the Red
Sox... :-)
RE: McGee / waivers
He's a free agent. Oakland is probably just "renting" him as insurance
against this year's pennant. He can fly in the off-season. They can
afford a Felix Jose and a minor leaguer or two, most teams can't.
That's why they got him (for now).
-- dg
|
28.537 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Pseudo nouveau paraquasi noter | Thu Aug 30 1990 15:23 | 6 |
|
> Ever
>consider taking it seriously?? :-)
Nope.
|
28.538 | Didn't think so........ :-( | FREE::GOGUEN | Boggs watch: 33 games, 46 hits | Thu Aug 30 1990 15:48 | 1 |
|
|
28.539 | Keep that KoD alive! | CRBOSS::DERRY | Coming soon to HLO....again | Fri Aug 31 1990 06:15 | 2 |
| Sox keep rollin' along. Roger wins 20th. Yanks in town tonight...
Who wants to predict a NY sweep, in place of Dinz?
|
28.540 | What a great closer.....almost as good as Murphy | LUDWIG::GARRY | Bring on the A's | Fri Aug 31 1990 07:08 | 5 |
| Doug Jones is God...........he looked awesome the past couple of
appearances.
Tom
|
28.541 | Clemens is a bum! :-) for you of course, Mike | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 44 to go | Fri Aug 31 1990 07:59 | 1 |
|
|
28.542 | this should do it | CNTROL::CHILDS | Will Soxs Choke? Stay tuned.... | Fri Aug 31 1990 08:01 | 5 |
|
Yanks sweep soxs. jays 3 back...yeah Mac no S ;^)
mike
|
28.543 | Rajah! Rajah! Rajah! | GOOBER::ROSS | Me So Corny | Fri Aug 31 1990 08:15 | 2 |
| The Red Sox now are tied with Oakland for the largest lead over
the second place team.
|
28.544 | No W.S. in Beanburg | FMCSSE::BROWN | BombBombBomb,BombBomb Iraq | Fri Aug 31 1990 08:42 | 7 |
|
Yea but the DRed Skunks (tm) are still 7 games behind the A's on the
win list.
A's all the way to WS.
Cadzilla
|
28.545 | Oh well, there allways next year | FMCSSE::BROWN | Round'n Third and Head'n for Home | Wed Sep 05 1990 10:46 | 8 |
|
Can you spell SSSSwwwweeeeeeeepppp? Roger Clemens for the Cy Young,
give me a break. Eck's numbers look much better, Hell Welch has more
wins, and Stewart's thumped him three times this year. Get a clue,
No W.S. in Beanburg this year.
Cadzilla
|
28.546 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Sep 05 1990 10:57 | 10 |
| Interesting that Stewart has won 3 head-to-head games against Clemens.
But, what does that really mean? Stewart doesn't have to face his
own hitters, nor does Roger face the Sox.
So, does anyone have their records against common opponents?
It may be meaningless, but I'd like to see them.
Lee
|
28.547 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | and the wind it cried Mary.. | Wed Sep 05 1990 11:06 | 7 |
|
I think one of the best comments made by Remy last nights was
"and one of the Oakland batters are hellping Roger out by swing at bad
pitches"....
mike
|
28.548 | | FREE::GOGUEN | Boggs watch: 27 games, 38 hits | Wed Sep 05 1990 11:15 | 11 |
| > So, does anyone have their records against common opponents?
Let's see -- if neither Stewart nor Clemens has faced the Sox/A's
except against each other, then:
Stewart 15-10
Clemens 20- 3
against the rest of the league -- their common opponents......
-- dg
|
28.549 | | FRSBEE::BROOKS | SPORTS' Reverse Racist Rabblerouser | Wed Sep 05 1990 13:24 | 1 |
| Let it rest ... Stewart is near-deity .... SO THERE !
|
28.550 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Tools? What Tools? | Wed Sep 05 1990 13:37 | 12 |
|
The Sox in the AL East are a big fish in a small pond and are the
cock-of-the-walk in their division. (How's that for mixed metaphors?)
They're just doing the ol' 'possum trick by lulling the A's into
complacency so they can ambush 'em in the playoffs. Good strategy,
I'd say. Joe Morgan: Supergenius. Manager of the year! 8^)
Let's go Sox...let's get swept, build up the A's overconfidence
some more, then we'll show 'em what we're made of in the ALCS!
Dickster the Delerious
|
28.551 | How do you figure that Doc? | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Nostra/DONus | Wed Sep 05 1990 14:51 | 0 |
28.552 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Sep 06 1990 05:44 | 7 |
| Good stats, Don, but that doesn't really say what each did against
common opponents. What would be more meaningful to me would be
each guys's record against each of the remaining teams in a given
period of time. Like, Clemens is x-x against Seattle, while Stewart
is x-x.
Lee
|
28.553 | Clemens Hurt | MPO::GILBERT | A Kinder Gentler MAXCIM - D4.3.0 | Thu Sep 06 1990 10:10 | 6 |
|
Armageddon is here now. Clemens has a shoulder problem that could
be a muscle tear. He could be lost for the season. Then again it
could all be part of Morgan's "let's see how confident we can make
the A's" ploy....
|
28.554 | | PNO::HEISER | live your life for a change | Thu Sep 06 1990 10:16 | 4 |
| What were the scores for the last 2 nights?
Thanks,
Mike
|
28.555 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | How much you wanna bet I fit this P-name | Thu Sep 06 1990 10:25 | 7 |
|
> What were the scores for the last 2 nights?
Don't know. They haven't finished adding them up yet.
Dickster
|
28.556 | | FMCSSE::BROWN | Round'n Third and Head'n for Home | Thu Sep 06 1990 11:39 | 4 |
|
Last night was another un-important lose, 10 - zip to the A's.
Cadzilla
|
28.557 | hey Karen, this one's for you! | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Wed Sep 12 1990 13:25 | 4 |
| Down to 3 GONGS !!!
Joe (returning the favor)
|
28.558 | 3 GONGS up looks ahellofalot better than 21 GONGS back. (-: | CRBOSS::DERRY | sometimes we walk alone... | Wed Sep 12 1990 14:59 | 1 |
|
|
28.559 | ...not if you're in the running for the 1st pick in the draft...! | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Sep 12 1990 15:10 | 1 |
|
|
28.560 | | BOSOX::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Thu Sep 13 1990 05:34 | 3 |
| Sox win, Jays lose, lead back up to 4.
Lee
|
28.561 | I still listen for the DJ's not the music | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 13 1990 07:16 | 13 |
| got to share this BCN joke with those who don't get it or don't both to
listen now that they're all hits radio all the time...
one of their usual feature is Sports for Girls (big intro music, dateline
type typing etc) and then the girl comes on and speaks
"I don't get it how can the Red Soxs have a 2 1/2 game lead over the Bluejays?
I don't think it's fair how can they charge full admission for a 1/2 game?"
obviously our women readers are excempt from this joke as they fully
understand the standings and how they work....
mike
|
28.562 | -GONG, -GONG, -GONG, -GONG | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Sep 13 1990 07:22 | 1 |
|
|
28.563 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Thu Sep 13 1990 07:41 | 8 |
| re the last few:
When the Red Sox are in first place, Eddie Anvilhead says that they're
x number of kisses (not gongs) in first. The gongs come into play only
when they're out of first.
py
|
28.564 | I like negative gongs better Paul. 8^) | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Sep 13 1990 08:11 | 1 |
|
|
28.565 | but | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Thu Sep 13 1990 15:52 | 7 |
| > -< 3 GONGS up looks ahellofalot better than 21 GONGS back. (-: >-
but it won't mean nuthin' if they don't win it all....
For me, "it ain't worth the trip if ya come back empty-handed".
Joe
|
28.566 | | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Thu Sep 13 1990 16:01 | 3 |
| Then you've been savin' plenty on mileage lately, huh Joe?
daryll
|
28.567 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | | Thu Sep 13 1990 19:29 | 6 |
| re .565
Joe,
Even if you have the worst record in the league and almost all of
baseball?
|
28.568 | Who was It??? | CSC32::LATOUR | TOUCH THIS !!! | Thu Sep 13 1990 22:21 | 9 |
|
Question for you dedicated Red Sox Fans.
Who was the batter that won the game for the Sox in the Playoff
series against the Angels in 1986?
Drewski
|
28.569 | Not a 'dedicated' fan though | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Fri Sep 14 1990 06:32 | 2 |
| Dave Henderson?
Denny
|
28.570 | Hendu | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: Snaps bat with 27 to go | Fri Sep 14 1990 07:21 | 5 |
| Don Baylor hit one out to put the Sox in a position to win and as Denny
noted, Dave Henderson hit one out with two strikes and two outs in the
ninth. The guy had an incredible playoff/series year in '86.
Steve
|
28.571 | Talk about "CLUTCH" | CURIE::WENTZELL | Only 3 more days! | Fri Sep 14 1990 10:12 | 5 |
| I had a flat tire on I-95 in NH when Hendu hit that dinger, listing to the game
on the radio as I struggled with the spare. I started dancing around on the
side of the road, passing cars honking as they sped by. I'll never forget it.
Scott
|
28.572 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Silence speaks as loud as words | Fri Sep 14 1990 10:33 | 6 |
| Scott,
You best change that p-name; it's tomorrow!
:^)
|
28.573 | | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Fri Sep 14 1990 10:47 | 5 |
| > Even if you have the worst record in the league and almost all of
> baseball?
Not following ya Bruce. What's this got to do with the Sox' possibilities
of winning it all ?
|
28.574 | Being 20+ games back you have to say something like this.... | CRBOSS::DERRY | sometimes we walk alone... | Fri Sep 14 1990 11:09 | 7 |
| >but it won't mean nuthin' if they don't win it all....
>For me, "it ain't worth the trip if ya come back empty-handed".
Yeah, and tell me that if the Yanks finished 2nd and the Sox finished 50 games
out you wouldn't be somewhat satisfied with the season. Uh-huh. I believe
ya.
|
28.575 | Talk about anything but NY these days... | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Fri Sep 14 1990 11:18 | 5 |
| Boy, mention the Yankees and all the NY fans start to ask what
note we're in, what does this have to do with the Sox, etc
etc....
daryll
|
28.576 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Sep 14 1990 11:50 | 1 |
| Still holding at -4 gongs.
|
28.577 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:09 | 4 |
| What's with the Red Sox conference today? I'm unable to access it.
py
|
28.578 | | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:15 | 5 |
|
Looks like SHPLOG's down, HARBOR's up. Do a mod/file=HARBOR::RED_SOX.
glenn
|
28.579 | my mail's still working, how about yours? :-) | SASE::SZABO | | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:19 | 1 |
|
|
28.580 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Rodney Hampton...ROY | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:21 | 6 |
|
toronto by the end of 9 more days will close gap to 2
dinz
|
28.581 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:27 | 6 |
| re .578:
Changing my entry to HARBOR::RED_SOX did the trick, thanks Glenn.
py
|
28.582 | Dinz, send me mail... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Sep 14 1990 12:35 | 1 |
|
|
28.583 | I guess it comes down to, "what are you playing for ?" | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Fri Sep 14 1990 13:00 | 12 |
| >Yeah, and tell me that if the Yanks finished 2nd and the Sox finished 50 games
>out you wouldn't be somewhat satisfied with the season. Uh-huh. I believe
>ya.
Believe it. The most painful Yankees' seasons were '80 and '81, when
they had one of the best teams in baseball and didn't win it all.
What's that old line ?..."that (2nd place) and a quarter will get you
a cup of coffee".
Joe
|
28.584 | | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: Snaps bat with 27 to go | Fri Sep 14 1990 13:50 | 11 |
| How many Yankee fans (or baseball fans for that matter) predicted the
Red Sox would be four games up with 3 weeks to go. This season has been
a total surprise, and anything more will be an added plus. Oakland has
all the horses, so the pressure's on them.
If you really think the season's a total waste when you don't win it all,
I believe you've got a warped sense of what sports is all about. You
ought to know that, being a fan of Syracuse. This isn't meant as a dig
either.
Steve
|
28.585 | The "Yank-me index" is born :-) :-) | AKOV06::DCARR | Just call me Carr-nac | Fri Sep 14 1990 14:29 | 16 |
| Gee, five replies and nobody thanked Dinz for the KOD he layed on the
B-Jays (tm :-)...
And Joe, you're either missing the point or you're being a pain in the
ass :-) The point is, the first criterion of a successfull Sox
season, for many Boston fans (yours truly included), is: did we finish
ahead of the hated Yanks?... just I as KNOW that many Yank-me fans
consider their season a success if they finish ahead of the Sox...
Given that, and the expectations at the beginning of the season, this
has been a WONDERFUL year for Yank-me haters, and, obviously, the worst
nightmare of Yank-me fans/Sox haters... Maybe we can come up with a
"Yank-me" index that rates each season by the number of games ahead of
the Yank-me's the Sox are :-)
ML
|
28.586 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Fri Sep 14 1990 14:32 | 7 |
| For the fans, well, maybe. For the organization, finishing with
anything less than a championship can be a success but being
*SATISFIED* with anything less than a championship is putting the
organization on the road to failure. That's the complaint I, and many
other New Englanders, have with the Red Sox and management.
John
|
28.587 | | CAM::WAY | Batman plays rugby...Robin plays softball | Fri Sep 14 1990 14:40 | 9 |
| > For the fans, well, maybe. For the organization, finishing with
> anything less than a championship can be a success but being
> *SATISFIED* with anything less than a championship is putting the
> organization on the road to failure. That's the complaint I, and many
> other New Englanders, have with the Red Sox and management.
Which is something Whalers fans have been complaining about for years!
'Saw
|
28.588 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iraq nuked;film after Sox hilites | Fri Sep 14 1990 14:44 | 30 |
|
Re: .584
Ya know, Steve, that's a good point. "Has blank ever won the blank?"
does seem to show up a lot in this file. If winning the whole thing
is the only thing, then what is the purpose of a season in the first
place? Why not just have an annual tournament, and only watch when
your team is in the finals? (The potential deciding game at that,
since anything prior would be pointless.)
Winning the whole shootin' match, or the *hope* of winning it all,
is what certainly keeps a lot of Red Sox fans going to games. It's the
thrill of the hunt that gets the heart beating. And just like real
hunting and fishing, it ain't necessarily the piece of meat or fish
on the plate that provides the greatest satisfaction, but what led
up to it.
The greater the odds, the bigger the victory. The Sox have never
been favored to win a series in my lifetime, and they lost accordingly.
But the thrill of the games was still there. Life will go on if/when
they get bounced out of the playoffs in four. Then spring rolls
around, and the heart starts beating again, knowing that the knife
of defeat could stop its pulsating anytime between opening day and
the first week of October. But it's only a game, only a temporary
death, and we revive our hopes that there is a God in heaven, and
that the Sox will win the Series. I'm not sure which one we'll
see first.
Dickster
|
28.589 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Fri Sep 14 1990 14:48 | 10 |
| re .585:
> Gee, five replies and nobody thanked Dinz for the KOD he layed on the
> B-Jays (tm :-)...
Ah hah, so that's why that immortal hurler Jose Mesa was able to
outduel Dave Steib last night... :-)
py
|
28.590 | | CAM::WAY | Batman plays rugby...Robin plays softball | Fri Sep 14 1990 14:50 | 7 |
| Dickster...
It was flowing, man, the shit was just flowin...
Maybe you could give us a reading ;^)
'Saw
|
28.591 | Winning isn't everything. It's (well, you know the rest) | AKOV06::DCARR | Just call me Carr-nac | Fri Sep 14 1990 14:51 | 17 |
| John,
I agree with you 100% - and if you recall, I've bashed the Sox org.
frequently about their lack of desire to make the Oakland-like move of
sacrificing the future for a championship - now! My point was just
that, when the inevitable fold comes, at least WE have the Yank-me's to
look back on...
And Dickster, I know what you're saying, and the thrill of the chase
can keep you going in the present: but, when you look back, if you
haven't won it all, it just CAN'T be a succesfull season - yeah, you
might have some great memories, etc... - but you didn't get the brass
ring! 100 years from now, the winner of the Series will be in the
Almanac. The fact that the Sox struggled against mighty odds to rise
up and get swept by the A's in the playoffs probably won't be!
ML
|
28.592 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | On site, out of mind | Fri Sep 14 1990 15:12 | 13 |
| John H and ML share my sentiment. You can take the phrase we always
here about good Sox teams (Who would have ever thought this team
would be where they are now) and throw it out. Other than the
Yankees, no team was out of it, and I've been more impressed with
Detriot's season than the Sox.
If the Sox hang on and win the East, but not the World Series, we'll
be bombarded by Sox fans and scribes saying "Yeah, but who'd a thunk
we'd go this far, a yuch, a yuch, a yuch." It fits with the Bostonian
mold of "We don't have good talented teams, just overachieving,
hustling, righteous teams..."
JD
|
28.593 | | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: Snaps bat with 27 to go | Fri Sep 14 1990 15:19 | 9 |
| The point is, JD, this is not a good Sox team. Big difference. I was
dissapointed as hell when the Red Sox teams of the late 70s didn't win
squat. I'm not going to jump in front of a bus if the Red Sox don't
with the World Series this year.
I'd much rather watch a team of overachievers (read: Bruins) than a
team of half hearted prima donnas.
Steve
|
28.594 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iraq nuked;film after Sox hilites | Fri Sep 14 1990 15:31 | 5 |
|
>Maybe you could give us a reading ;^)
I can't! I don't have any mail!
|
28.595 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | On site, out of mind | Fri Sep 14 1990 15:42 | 13 |
| Steve,
I don't think this Sox team is as bad as everyone made it out to
be. They were lacking in pitching, and have had a coupl of suprises,
but I fully expected at least 35-37 victories from CLemens and
Boddicker. I knew the run production would be there, it always
is.
As for the Bruins, I don't find them overachievers at all - I find
that a convenient Boston media ploy to ready-make an excuse for
when they bow out in the playoffs.
JD
|
28.596 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iraq nuked;film after Sox hilites | Fri Sep 14 1990 15:42 | 10 |
|
Yeah, it hurts to never have won, but I don't consider the season's
enjoyment a waste either. I've had some nice dinners without dessert,
and (years ago) had some nice evenings out parking without...well,
you know. And I have to agree that we gotta have that world series
and the "you know" sooner or later because there's only so much
frustration a guy can stand. ;^)
Dickster
|
28.597 | great stuff on a Friday afternoon | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Fri Sep 14 1990 15:52 | 30 |
| > The point is, the first criterion of a successfull Sox
> season, for many Boston fans (yours truly included), is: did we finish
> ahead of the hated Yanks?... just I as KNOW that many Yank-me fans
> consider their season a success if they finish ahead of the Sox...
Ah Dave, I see the center of our misunderstanding. A Yanks fan's (at least
one west or southwest of Mass) 1ST CONCERN is whether the team can win
the championship, NOT where we'll finish in relation to the Boston Red Sox.
As an example, I mentioned the heart-breaking '80-81 seasons...in '80
the Yanks came to Fenway in Sept, swept 4 and eliminated Boston from the
division title hunt. But I have to strain to remember this, as the year
is blackened by the failure to win the world championship.
John Hendry, you said it better than I could. Thanks.
And Steve, when it comes to the Yanks, my participation in this sport
may be warped. When you're brought up on a diet of Yankees glory, and
you've experienced championships yourself, "the thrill of the hunt"
is nothing unless you get what you came for. Ask a Celtics fan if
he's satisfied with winning the Atlantic Division, but losing to
the Knicks in the 1ST ROUND. Better yet, ask Larry Bird.
And your reference to my being a Syracuse fan puts us on common ground.
A Boston Globe writer once wrote that Syracuse is the Boston Red Sox
of NCAA basketball.
Joe
|
28.598 | The Year God Became A Phillies Phan, Phinally | SHALOT::HUNT | Wyld Stallyns Rules | Fri Sep 14 1990 16:00 | 8 |
| � As an example, I mentioned the heart-breaking '80-81 seasons...in '80
� the Yanks came to Fenway in Sept, swept 4 and eliminated Boston from
� the division title hunt. But I have to strain to remember this, as the
� year is blackened by the failure to win the world championship.
1980. Heavy sigh.
Bob Hunt
|
28.599 | Yikes! They're really gonna blow this, aren't they? | CRBOSS::DERRY | Walk away and taste the pain... | Mon Sep 17 1990 06:09 | 1 |
|
|
28.600 | Yup. | CSCOA3::KNORR_C | Carolina Blue | Mon Sep 17 1990 07:18 | 1 |
|
|
28.601 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Little roller up along first... | Mon Sep 17 1990 07:45 | 4 |
| This past week shows that this team is toast without Roger Clemens.
py
|
28.602 | Can you say CHOKE! | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Mon Sep 17 1990 07:57 | 9 |
|
GACK....ERP.....GASP....ACK....HMPHHHH...
Just a few sounds from the Red Sox dugout in Chicago.
Steve
|
28.604 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iraq nuked;film after Sox hilites | Mon Sep 17 1990 08:25 | 8 |
|
Sox are sinking faster than a submarine with screen doors.
But as they say, "It ain't over till somebody sticks a fork in the
fat lady."
Dickster
|
28.605 | Still dealing in negative GONGS... | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:22 | 1 |
|
|
28.606 | | SHIRE::FINEUC1 | | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:46 | 9 |
| Whether the Sox or Jays deserve it can be argued at length.
Reckon that the Toronto fans certainly deserve it for breaking the
attendance record (not to take anything away from those fantastic Boston
sports fans of course..;^)).
rick ellis
|
28.607 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Mon Sep 17 1990 10:55 | 4 |
| Yeah but Rick most of those Toronto fans just go to the games
to peek into the hotel rooms.
/Don
|
28.608 | Let's keep it quite till Toronto's magic number is zero | SNDBOX::HAUSRATH | Too many projects, not enough time | Mon Sep 17 1990 11:14 | 5 |
|
Warning to the Anti-sox .. let's not get too optimistic here.. they
might still pull it out and break all our hearts! :^)
/Jeff
|
28.609 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Rodney Hampton...ROY | Mon Sep 17 1990 11:18 | 2 |
| what dinz of death?
|
28.610 | Over acheivers all year long.... | DECWET::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Mon Sep 17 1990 12:25 | 22 |
| Let's be realistic here.
Take a look at the 1990 red Sox and tell me that they have a team that should
realistically be even contending for a division title. Any team that has Joe
heskith and Dana Kieker in the starting rotation and bullpen that lets up
as many runs as the Sox does doesn't deserve to be in a pennant race.
They've been overacheiving all year and it is starting to catch up with them.
Nobody got on the Orioles case last year when they folded in the stretch and
the Jays won the division. Everybody said that the Jays have so much talent
they should walk away with the division. Why is it any different this year?
With a front office that cares more about the bottom line than winning I'm
surprised how well they've done this year with a cast of mostly retreads and
unproven players coupled with a few veterans and 2 legitimate starting pitchers.
I thank the Sox for staying in the race as long as they have this year. Who
knows, if Clemens comes back they might still hang on for the stretch run.
Metz
|
28.611 | She's humming as she squeezes into her control-tops.... | LEDS::OBRIENR | | Mon Sep 17 1990 12:26 | 0 |
28.612 | Metz, remember the '88 Dodgers? | GENRAL::WADE | What you want? <ooh> Baby I got it | Mon Sep 17 1990 13:17 | 4 |
|
They weren't supposed to be able to beat the mighty A's......
Claybone
|
28.613 | jumping off the bandwagon already? | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Sep 17 1990 13:31 | 3 |
|
Where are all the Sox fans that we so vocal a week ago when the Sox
were up by 5.5 games?
|
28.614 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Mon Sep 17 1990 13:35 | 1 |
| STILL DEALING IN NEGATIVE GONGS. VOCAL ENOUGH FOR YA?
|
28.615 | | CAM::WAY | Batman plays rugby...Robin plays softball | Mon Sep 17 1990 13:38 | 9 |
| I think that it will be close, but if the Sox can get Quintana's bat
back in the lineup, they can pull it out.
Wouldn't be like the Sox to pull the old "think I'm gonna fold" routine
on us yet again.
Series coming up with the Yanks -- that should help 8^)
'Saw
|
28.616 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Mon Sep 17 1990 13:43 | 5 |
| Gorman's stubborn refusal to put Vaughn on the 40 man roster
(it *has* to be something with when he can go to arbitration) has
hurt the Sox. Even bonehaid Morgan knows he could only help.
/Don
|
28.617 | The most important player on the team ? | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Mon Sep 17 1990 15:48 | 9 |
| > This past week shows that this team is toast without Roger Clemens.
It may be just coincidental (after all, their offense should shoulder
much of the blame for their current problems), but the Clemens example
shows how important it is to have an ACE. Without Clemens, Harris,
Kiecker and Bolton don't look so good.
Joe
|
28.618 | | GOLF::KINGR | Save the EARTH, we may need it later!!! | Mon Sep 17 1990 20:42 | 12 |
| The Blue Jays traded P M. Guzzo and 2 minors to......
Cleveland for
P Bud Black...
The SOx play the Birds of Baltimore...
after jumping to a 5-0 lead now it is 5-3 Bosox...
REK
|
28.619 | BoSox and SexDome results please | SHIRE::FINEUC1 | | Tue Sep 18 1990 06:15 | 11 |
|
>>The SOx play the Birds of Baltimore...
>> after jumping to a 5-0 lead now it is 5-3 Bosox...
Jeepers, Rick, thanks for the suspense!!
Now that I have been holding my breath for 18 hours, let us have the
results!!
thanks, rick ellis
|
28.620 | | FSHQA2::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Sep 18 1990 07:32 | 4 |
| Sox win 7-3, Jays win 6-4, lead still one game, Collective Angst Grips
Hub.
John
|
28.621 | No bandwagon jumper here... | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 22 to go | Tue Sep 18 1990 07:37 | 4 |
| LIKE /DON SAID, STILL DEALING IN NEGATIVE GONGS. WHEN WAS THE LAST
TIME CLEVELAND WAS IN FIRST WITH 15 GAMES LEFT!
Steve
|
28.622 | GO SOX!!!!!!! | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Tue Sep 18 1990 07:44 | 8 |
|
NEVER MIND THAT! WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME CLEVELAND WAS IN!!!!!
Steve
|
28.623 | GO RED SOX! WHAT A TEAM!! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | RosannePregnant?HowCainYouTell? | Tue Sep 18 1990 09:07 | 0 |
28.624 | | CSC32::J_HERNANDEZ | Wow, Good nyborg man. | Tue Sep 18 1990 09:13 | 10 |
| re Clay.
Yeh, but ther 88 Dodgers had Tommy Lasarda to motivate them and Orel
Hershiser to baffle the A's. The A's clearly were not the best team in
baseball that year. If they were so good, how come L.A.'s subs beat
them in 5? Clearly the Dodgers were better.
Granted the A's would stomp the Sox if the Sox even get to the playoffs.
|
28.625 | sox choke, no film at 11 (buisness as usual!) | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Sep 18 1990 09:54 | 5 |
|
re: .621
Cleveland was in first place last week with 15 games left!
Have clue, huh?
|
28.626 | ? | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Tue Sep 18 1990 10:02 | 4 |
|
re: .625
What league? What Sport? Huh?
|
28.627 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Sep 18 1990 10:08 | 15 |
|
re: .626
I answered the question, this following statement is false.
"LIKE /DON SAID, STILL DEALING IN NEGATIVE GONGS. WHEN WAS THE LAST
TIME CLEVELAND WAS IN FIRST WITH 15 GAMES LEFT!"
My question, when is the last time the Red Sox won a World Series?
Was it before or after the last Indians World Series win in 1948?
Have the donks ever won an NFL champsionship?
|
28.628 | | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 22 to go | Tue Sep 18 1990 10:48 | 7 |
| Grono,
Who gives a rat's ass about 1948? That's history, right! I mean
that's what you always throw at us when we sing the praises of the
Celtics. The fact is the Cleveland Indians are nuttin'!
Steve
|
28.629 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Sep 18 1990 11:53 | 6 |
|
Morg,
... and the sox have been nuttin' since 1918! Right!
Paul
|
28.630 | Oh ya and like Cleveland sports some great teams. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Tue Sep 18 1990 12:03 | 9 |
|
I certainly hope that your not confusing me with a Donkey's fan.
No way. Go sox!
Steve
|
28.631 | Still no GONGS...(yet) :-) | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 20 to go | Wed Sep 19 1990 05:30 | 1 |
|
|
28.632 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | New Sox fans: Welcome into the fold | Wed Sep 19 1990 08:00 | 6 |
|
Now's a good time to buy DEC stock and purchase a seat on the Red Sox
bandwagon. Line forms to the right, Visa and Master Charge accepted.
Dickster
|
28.633 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Little roller up along first... | Wed Sep 19 1990 08:17 | 8 |
| When Jose Mesa (whom I thought was no longer regarded as a prospect)
holds the Sox to just three hits in seven innings, and David Segui (who
had either 2 or 3 HR all season at Rochester) hits a 3-run HR, you
gotta wonder if there's something to this "curse of the Bambino"
stuff...
py
|
28.634 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Sep 19 1990 08:54 | 3 |
|
Silence at last... the GONGing has stopped!
|
28.635 | | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Wed Sep 19 1990 09:46 | 4 |
| Wow, It's as quiet as Municipal Stadium during a pennant race in
here :-).
daryll
|
28.636 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Sep 19 1990 10:09 | 4 |
|
re: .635
Wow... I'm rolling... did you come up with that all by yourself?
|
28.637 | And here's a smiley for ya...:-) | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 20 to go | Wed Sep 19 1990 12:00 | 8 |
| Re: .636
You should be the last one to bust chops about comebacks! I haven't
seen a civilized reply from you in this file for a good nine months.
Not that I'm counting mind you, but it does get a bit ridiculous trying
to reply to some of your notes.
Steve
|
28.638 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Sep 19 1990 13:22 | 4 |
|
re: .637
Try NEXTED UNSEEN instead of REPLY then...
|
28.639 | | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Wed Sep 19 1990 16:06 | 4 |
| > gotta wonder if there's something to this "curse of the Bambino"
Paul, the "proof of the pudding" will be what happens in "The House
That Ruth Built" this weekend.
|
28.640 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Sep 20 1990 06:40 | 9 |
| The "House that George Rebuilt" is more like it. I'm still
trying to figure out the "silence" that Paul is talking about.
Same people in here all year, are still here. And it's still only
one GONG. Tom Chappel pointed out something to me this morning.
If you have the one star edition of the Globe look real close around
the top of page 93. Looks like some printer has a pretty good sense
of humor. 8^)
/Don
|
28.641 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Thu Sep 20 1990 06:43 | 2 |
| Jays last 9 games are on the road.
Denny
|
28.642 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his Lips...Know New Taxes!! | Thu Sep 20 1990 06:44 | 3 |
| A huge crowd of 4.082 in Cleveland the other night. Took some kids
20 minutes to get to a foul ball.
Denny
|
28.643 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Sep 20 1990 07:21 | 4 |
| Not one comment on Pe�a? I think he had every right to do what
he did.
/Don
|
28.644 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Rodney Hampton...ROY | Thu Sep 20 1990 07:31 | 6 |
|
Do ya mean throwing the chairs or the quitters comment, which he
retracted on news last night....
dinz
|
28.645 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Sep 20 1990 07:34 | 6 |
| Dinz, you were there? You know what Pe�a said? How's Baltimore
these days anyway? There's more than one Boston scribe that would've
wanted Tony to say they were quitters whether he said it or not.
But since you were there I guess he really said it...
/Don
|
28.646 | little Mikey's a real tough guy huh Don? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 20 1990 07:36 | 11 |
|
best part of the Pena deal was toughy Mikey Greenwall threw a chair at
Pena's lockers 10 minutes after Pena had left. Just goes to prove there
aren't many real men on the team. If Greenwall had filberts he would have
confronted Tony straight up being the coward that he is.....
While I agree with what Pena did it sure seems like this should have been
done by the bonehead manager who was just a cheerleader in this fiasco....
mike
|
28.647 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Rodney Hampton...ROY | Thu Sep 20 1990 07:36 | 8 |
|
i tell ya /don, you have been defensive all week, must be pressure
of the sox doing the jugalar act that got ya that way.. i was
just throwing a question out, why the attack??
dinz
|
28.648 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Sep 20 1990 07:48 | 11 |
| 'Cuz you're fun to attack Dinz. And what's a "jugalar act"?
Something that involves animals, females and a rubber hose? Mike,
I've never liked Greenwell. He's a Wardlelike (i.e. yuppie) player
who cain't field worth a lick. Defensive? I've been called a
bandwagon jumper, silent in defeat, etc. Now if you really want
to see defensive, somebody ask how the Yankees and Indians are doing.
Go ahead. Make my day.
/Don
P.S. since we're all so sensitive lately 8^)
|
28.649 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Rodney Hampton...ROY | Thu Sep 20 1990 07:56 | 7 |
| i know i m fun to attack, just had to see where your coming from
big guy...
dinz
|
28.650 | For whom the GONG tolls; it tolls for Tollway | MCIS1::DHAMEL | New Sox fans: Welcome into the fold | Thu Sep 20 1990 08:08 | 13 |
|
According to the Glob, some of the regular Sox whiners had a hissy-fit
that Pena called them quitters in a room full of press people, instead
of in private. Greenwell and Evans expressed their displeasure over
the incident.
Funny, but Joe Morgan commented the other day on how the final weeks of
the pennant race was going to be so much "fun". Sounds like your boys are
really yukking it up while losing something like 14 of their last 20
games down the stretch. Hey Joe, are we having fun yet?
Dickster the Depressed
|
28.651 | 99% sure it's the truth | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 20 1990 08:10 | 10 |
|
Don, cmon what do you think he was throwing the chairs around because
he was happy? Sure the sportswriters would love to label them quitters
but in this case i doubt they're obstucating......
mike
ps: oh yeah ;^)
|
28.652 | THE YEAR THAT LOU G. AND JOE M. LOST THE PENNANT | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Thu Sep 20 1990 08:28 | 7 |
| Will someone please explain why Danny Heep whose batting average is
.174 and sinking quicker than the sox themselves, keeps getting called
upon to pinch hit. Does he have something on Joe Morgan or what? Well
at least the Red Sox will have a fresh and well rested MO VAUGHN for
next year when he is needed.
Eddie F.
|
28.653 | | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Thu Sep 20 1990 08:46 | 5 |
| Dinz, I think /Don is coming from Maynard....
HTH
daryll
|
28.654 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Sep 20 1990 08:47 | 6 |
| Mike, I didn't say Pe�a was having fun. What you just said
proves my point. People will hear what they want to hear, so I
give Tony the benefit of the doubt. The Sox failure to make any
moves, with the lone exception of the Anderson deal might cost them.
/Don
|
28.655 | | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Sep 20 1990 08:52 | 9 |
|
I saw Pena admitting calling the team "quitters" in an interview last
night. And after seeing Burks and Greenwell both swing at first-pitch
bad balls in the bottom of the ninth against destruction-prone Gregg
Olson, demonstrating a complete lapse of mental concentration, I had to
agree with him.
glenn
|
28.656 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 20 1990 08:56 | 13 |
|
Don, if isn't calling them quitters, then why were Mikey and Dewey
so upset? Did he forget to invite them to a tupperware demonstration
or something? Face it Don as much as they have tried to deny it they're
still a 25 cabs ballclub....
It will alway be that way with their present upper level management who
only cares about sitting 2+ million a year not winning. With Clemens'
problems why didn't they immediately get someone to come in? BlueJays
can't use Bud Black in the playoffs if I'm not mistaken but they can
sure use him against the Soxs........
mike
|
28.657 | | GENRAL::WADE | What you want? <ooh> Baby I got it | Thu Sep 20 1990 09:10 | 6 |
|
I know exactly what this team needs........Roger Clemens
to come back and hit a few batters! That'll get the team
liking each other again ;-)
Claybone
|
28.658 | | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Thu Sep 20 1990 09:40 | 18 |
| FWIW, IMO Pena's comments were wrong. I'd expect his comments to
come from an immature, younger player. Not from someone who's
been in a pennant race before and understands the pressures of
the situation.
Boston fans, stop over analyzing this thing. If they lose this
thing, the turning point will be getting swept by Oakland at
home (following a winning streak), and Clemens getting injured.
They then went on the road (where they haven't played well all
year), started losing, and Toronto started winning (mostly at
home).
Let's see what happens once Boston comes home (with Clemens pitching)
and Toronto goes on the road. Of course it may be a little late by
then.
Joe
|
28.659 | we're a team hahahahahahaahahahahahaaaaa | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 20 1990 10:01 | 15 |
|
>FWIW, IMO Pena's comments were wrong. I'd expect his comments to
>come from an immature, younger player. Not from someone who's
>been in a pennant race before and understands the pressures of
>the situation.
Sorry Joe, but I can't buy this. Given that Pena knows the pressure and
the situation he should know something about what type of character
is required by the players to go for it all something that's obviously
lacking in the Sox's chemistry. I'll give you that it really wasn't
his place to do it but when the manager sits on his butt instead of
chewing his players out then somebody has to step forward and it
certainly should be a veteran who has been in the situation before.
mike
|
28.660 | "me know baseball..." | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Thu Sep 20 1990 10:12 | 9 |
| > Sorry Joe, but I can't buy this. Given that Pena knows the pressure and
> the situation he should know something about what type of character
> is required by the players to go for it all something that's obviously
> lacking in the Sox's chemistry.
But Mike, was a "chewing out" necessary, or some other type of "leadership"
sign ? Sounds to me like Mr. Pena doesn't have a lot between the ears...
ie: doesn't recognize the makeup of the individuals on the club...who
didn't react positively to his stupid statement.
|
28.661 | | LUNER::BROOKS | I can make it 'mo better .... | Thu Sep 20 1990 10:43 | 11 |
| Funny how everyone was lavishing praise all over Pena for his "positive
clubhouse influence" earlier when the team was winning (along with
usual Rice/Stanley/et al bash job).
Now the Sox are playing down to their actual level, and Pena's action
is now viewed in a different light.
Face it, this harmony thing is B.S. Winning is the bottom line.
Something Jim Bouton said was very true, winning tends to breed harmony
- NOT the other way around (as a rule) ....
|
28.662 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Sep 20 1990 10:50 | 14 |
|
Joe, if Pena is out there playing as hard as possibly can what other
type of leadership is there? The manager lacked the guts what need to be
said so he said it for him. Probably saw it work for Whitey so he felt
it was time to take matters into his own hands.
As the old saying goes the truth hurts and obviously the babies on the
team didn't like hearing the truth.
they blew a 6 game lead in under 3 weeks some type of action had to be
taken. Right or wrong atleast Pena had the guts to do it and personally
I think he was right....
mike
|
28.663 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,Pe�a | Thu Sep 20 1990 10:54 | 2 |
|
|
28.664 | | 12354::J_HALPIN | Acres of Kites!!!! | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:02 | 8 |
|
All I have to say is, "Way to go Tony Pena!!!!". As to Mike Greenwell,
shut you face, stop throwing hissy-fits and demanding apologies!!! If you think
Pena has done you wrong, prove it on on the field....
JimH
|
28.665 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Rodney Hampton...ROY | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:09 | 2 |
| GOOD POINT JIM, EXCEPT, GREENWELL CANT PROVE IT, AT LEAST NOT
DEFENSIVELY
|
28.667 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Homer,Plato,Voltaire,Pe�a | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:15 | 1 |
| Steven, you Devil you...
|
28.669 | Greenwell gives...and takes | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Nuke the New Kids!! | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:31 | 12 |
| Notice how Greenwell backs up his brave chair-throwing retaliation: he
plays one ball last night like it was a live grenade, he hits a
singleton home run with the team down by 3, leading off an inning, and
then soon after congratulating himself for reaching second on a popup
the Orioles turned into a double in the late innings, he inexcusably
goes for third on a grounder to short and is thrown out, costing his
team a subsequent run. That's somewhere around the 10th basic
baserunning blunder that heads-up Greenwell has perpetrated this
season. He tries to be aggressive, but doesn't have the brain to know
when.
Dan
|
28.670 | | UPWARD::HEISER | play that nice, nice music | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:38 | 2 |
| They're just jerkin' their fans around as usual. They've blown bigger
leads in less time!
|
28.671 | Thank the high heavens they're not playing tonight | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 20 to go | Thu Sep 20 1990 11:41 | 24 |
| Although I don't necessarily agree with the statement, who cares if
they're a 25 cabs for 25 players team anyway? This isn't a job where
you're working 8-10 hour days with a team of people such as we noters
do. Gorman and "upper management" felt Lee Smith was a cancer in the
clubhouse, so they sign nice guy from Western Mass., Jeff Reardon. The
same Jeff Reardon that led the league in blown saves last year. Now
they have a nice guy in the clubhouse who's at the end of his career,
and they trade one of the top relief men to St. Louis where he's
throwing bb's. That's bull*.
Greenwell wouldn't know what pitch selection meant if Williams and Boggs
whispered the words in his ear every night. I've never seen anyone
swing at the first pitch as often as this guy does.
Danny Heep at this point in time, is a total waste of space on the
bench. Putting him up there to pinch hit is a total joke. Morgan's got
rocks in his head to even think about it never mind actually doing it,
which he's done the past three games.
As Claybone says, what this team needs is a healthy Roger Clemens,
their most valuable player, and I think a league wide candidate for the
same award.
Steve
|
28.672 | | CAM::WAY | Lookin' for drool next week... | Thu Sep 20 1990 12:29 | 35 |
| Chemistry on sports team is a very funny thing. And like most
situations in life, there is no black and white when it comes
to who's to blame.
While Pena may have had a right to say what he said, he didn't
exercise discretion in when and where he said it. Likewise,
I'm sure Greenwell felt the barb intensely because he knows he's
a lot to do with causing the remark.
In a lot of sports situations, when you're losing, or on a downswing,
the captain is the logical person to focus on in terms of providing
leadership to turn things around. Unfortunately, Morgan is about
as useless as teats on a bull.
And the Boston media just exacerbates the situation. We had a
small incident on the Wanderers a few weeks ago, where a player
yelled at another player in the middle of a game, on the field,
and using an obscenity. This behavior was (and still is) clearly
unacceptable, even though in the heat of combat. It was dealt
with quietly after the game, and an announcement made about it
as the following practice. I can only imagine the same situation
under the magnifying glass of the Boston media and the resulting
report.....
The Sox will either complete their threatened fold, and soon, or they
will hang on to win the AL EAST. However, this division within the
team does not bode well for the team in the playoffs.
Bottom line, the teams needs a manager who can manage, a GM who
doesn't suffer from Terminal Rectal-Cranial Insertion like Gorman,
and perhaps a few more players who know how to hit and field....
'Saw
|
28.673 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Sep 21 1990 05:29 | 15 |
| That Pena's a bum, alright. Imagine anyone upsetting the "harmony"
of the Red Sox. For shame, for shame. Let's not worry about winning
the division title, it's more important that we all appear to like
each other. What the heck, blowing a 6 game lead, and in September,
means nothing as long as we publicly support each other. Or at
least don't appear to be non-supportive of our teammates.
BULL! For whatever his reasons were, he exploded. Good for him.
Give'm hell.
Would some of you prefer that he stew in silence for now, then get
himself on to some other team?
Lee
|
28.674 | Look ma, I can catch the ball with one hand! | BUILD::MORGAN | Boggs Watch: 20 to go | Fri Sep 21 1990 07:59 | 5 |
| Greenwell's a hypocrite for getting pissed at Pena. He can take his
frightening fielding skills and half bald ugly haircut somewhere else
if he's gonna act like a little brat.
Steve
|
28.675 | the saga continues... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Fri Sep 21 1990 08:02 | 8 |
|
and poor little Mikey Greenwall wants an apology but isn't man enough to
ask Pena face to face for it. If I was Tony I'd give it to him. I'd make
it a straight right, right on the nose....
what a wuss.......
mike
|
28.676 | GONG | CRBOSS::DERRY | Looks like I'm going Republican... | Fri Sep 21 1990 10:54 | 6 |
| Anyone got tickets to the Toronto series? I'll be in the bleachers
somewhere, on the 28th, watching God (if he throws on Sunday) hand
the Jays their heads. Go Clemens! Go Sox! What a team! (-:
Greenwell is a drip. Always has been.
|
28.677 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | WellesleyWelcomeWagon | Mon Sep 24 1990 12:31 | 7 |
| First the Sox lose two games to what very well could be the
worse team in baseball, then Bohehaid Morgan says how happy he is
to be one game out of first place. Too much! That's like getting
beat up by a 98 pound weakling then saying how happy you are you
have medical insurance!
/Don
|
28.678 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | WellesleyWelcomeWagon | Mon Sep 24 1990 12:33 | 2 |
| ...oh yeah, and Mike Corbett, wherever you are, Morgan should've
never brought in that *stiff* Murphy on Saturday night. 8^)
|
28.679 | | UPWARD::HEISER | play that nice, nice music | Mon Sep 24 1990 12:42 | 4 |
| I take it that NY won 2 out of 3 and the Jays lost 2 out of 3. How did
Clemens do? When do they meet each other (Boston & Toronto)?
Mike
|
28.680 | | CAM::WAY | Pez...Cherry flavored Pez..definitely | Mon Sep 24 1990 12:47 | 4 |
| Being a Red Sox fan is like dating the ultimate tease.
I think we should change their name to the Boston Blue Jox....
|
28.681 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | WellesleyWelcomeWagon | Mon Sep 24 1990 12:51 | 5 |
| Clemens didn't pitch Mike. Soreness in his shoulder again.
He's tentatively scheduled to go Friday night. But don't bet on
it.
/Don
|
28.682 | we all know how he reacts to pressure situations | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Mon Sep 24 1990 13:05 | 4 |
|
I doubt it Don it's a pressure game.....
mike
|
28.683 | | SASE::SZABO | | Mon Sep 24 1990 13:22 | 10 |
| Here's the scenario......
Clemens, knowing that he's lost his grip on the Sy Yung to Bob Welch,
is saving it for the Jays series, gambling that the Sox will be tied
for 1st or 1 game back at worst. Fresh and well rested, he hopes to
come in blazing and blowing the Jays away with an impressive Sy Yung
performance........
Sy Sperling.
|
28.684 | I buy it | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Mon Sep 24 1990 13:52 | 9 |
|
or as a certained unnamed popular noter in here explained to me this morning
he's just faking the injury to protect his league leading 1.98 ERA. and this
particular noter is a big soxs fan. ;^)
this seems like a reasonable scenerio to me....
mike
|
28.685 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | WellesleyWelcomeWagon | Mon Sep 24 1990 13:55 | 5 |
| Hey Mike...
STUFF IT!
8^)
|
28.686 | you were right on about the Loonies and Shots though ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Mon Sep 24 1990 14:00 | 11 |
|
Hey Don,
Misfits 58 Bubbleheads 36
many smiles to you too ole NotraDONus ;^)
mike
|
28.687 | Mikey, you misquoted me! (-: | CRBOSS::DERRY | Looks like I'm going Republican... | Mon Sep 24 1990 15:57 | 1 |
|
|
28.688 | but that's the rule not the exception in here K ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Tue Sep 25 1990 07:38 | 3 |
|
|
28.689 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Rodney Hampton...ROY | Tue Sep 25 1990 12:54 | 3 |
|
whos knocking the loonies?
|
28.690 | Clemens is back! | CRBOSS::DERRY | Looks like I'm going Republican... | Mon Oct 01 1990 06:12 | 1 |
| Sox take 2 of 3 from Jays. Lead by 1 w/3 left.
|
28.691 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | One game lead, 3 (4?) games left | Mon Oct 01 1990 08:01 | 6 |
|
Gawd, I hate the thought of them facing Carleton Fiske the next three
games.
Dickster
|
28.692 | He's back! | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Mon Oct 01 1990 09:04 | 3 |
| Saturday's game qualify as clutch?
daryll
|
28.693 | WHATEVER IT TAKES TO WIN!!! | WMOIS::E_FASSETT | | Mon Oct 01 1990 09:07 | 4 |
| If the Red Sox are so worried about Fisk hurting them, then the first
time up in the series they should hit him in the knee with the
very first pitch. That way he will not be able to play, and therefore
he would not beat the Red Sox this year.
|
28.694 | Saturday = semi-clutch | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Mon Oct 01 1990 09:36 | 0 |
28.695 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 01 1990 11:40 | 4 |
|
The clutch game will be the one game playoff between the Jays and the
Sox. Clemens will take the loss... bank on it.
|
28.696 | | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Mon Oct 01 1990 12:36 | 9 |
| No playoff game. Won't need it.
Key to the season was game 1 and the Jays choked. George
Bell makes Mike Greenwell look like a Golden Glover.
Gotta go, got more mail from Dinz explaining what kind of a tough
schedule the Giants have had so far....
daryll
|
28.697 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Tue Oct 02 1990 05:39 | 3 |
| Sox win, Jays lose, magic number down to 1.
Lee
|
28.698 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Tue Oct 02 1990 07:00 | 3 |
| True lEe, but starting this weekend the 'magic number' will be
expanded to 9-1-1.
Denny
|
28.699 | At least a tie... | CAM::WAY | Happiness is a loose ruck | Tue Oct 02 1990 07:21 | 6 |
| My paper says the Sox have clinched a tie at least.
Gee, I wonder if for the next ten years we'll be talking about
a Junior f***ing Felix homer that puts us to bed in the playoff game 8^)
'Saw
|
28.700 | Wearing the Red Sox suspenders today | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Personal name has been SET HIDDEN | Tue Oct 02 1990 08:05 | 16 |
|
There ain't gonna be no stinking playoff game. There are two games
left, and all we gotta do is win one of 'em. The J's have been smoked,
so don't look for them to win both their remaining games.
The Sox have the division in hand. WHY WOULD ANYBODY HAVE REASON TO
THINK THEIR GONNA BLOW IT AND BLAM THEM!!!111 THEY WILL KNOCK THE A'S
ON THERE BUTTS!!!
"Red Sox: American League Eastern Division Champions". I like the
sound of that. "Joe Morgan: Super genius" sounds good too.
Champions. But we knew it all along, didn't we?
Dickster
|
28.701 | Boy, wouldn't it be fun if this comes true!!!! | 12354::J_HALPIN | The Delaware: river, bay or ocean??? | Tue Oct 02 1990 09:05 | 9 |
|
I'm going to predict the Sox will clinch the ALeast crown tonite despite
a loss to Chicago. But the Jays will also lose, when former Indian Bud Black
gets shelled by the Orioles!!!! I just knew that the Jays late season
acquisition of Black would be the deciding factor in the division race!!!! :-)
JimH
|
28.702 | | IAMOK::AHEARN | Rams vs. Bengals in SB XXV | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:12 | 20 |
| It came to me like a vision last night while watching the game......
Jody Reed was up with no score yet in the game, and all of a sudden it
dawned on me......the Red Sox are gonna win it ALL this year!!! I
honestly felt that they could have lost last night's game....and the
next game....and STILL win the East....and then go on to beat Oakland
and whoever is left standing in the NL!!! And the reason why they WILL
win it all has been sitting there staring me in the face all season
long........the black stripe on their shirtsleeve!!!
They dedicated this season to Tony C. at the beginning of the
season....and what would be more appropriate and/or storybook than to
break the 'Curse of the Bambino' after 72 years by winning it all
during a season dedicated to an individual as deserving as Tony C?
It's in the cards.....it's in the bank!!!! Boston Red Sox...1990 World
Series Champions!!! And as my T-shirt says..."Tony C. We'll never
forget".
Nelly
|
28.703 | AL East champs | UPWARD::HEISER | ultimate, underlyin', no denyin' motivation | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:18 | 3 |
| Is that 4 out of the last 5 years now?
Mike
|
28.704 | although he's more of a thrower ;^) | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:25 | 11 |
|
Where were all you cocky FAN's the last two weeks? ;^)
Bull, to answer your other question the Rocket is a good pitcher, I've
never denied that. I just don't think he's the best in the game but
certainly in the top ten...
While Boggs and "Wood" Elway aren't even close to the top ten in their
respective fields hence the overrated tie between them...
mike
|
28.705 | 3/5: 1986, 1988, 1990 | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:43 | 1 |
|
|
28.706 | Give the guy some credit. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Tue Oct 02 1990 11:59 | 6 |
|
Boggs is in the top 10 3rd baseman in the Majors, in my opinion.
Can you name 10 better?
Steve
|
28.707 | why bother? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Tue Oct 02 1990 12:02 | 9 |
|
I was refering to top ten everyday players vs. pitchers and while I can
I better not cause I'd hate to upset poor ole Nelly by actually offering
something constructive and ruining his opinion of me.....
mike
|
28.708 | Ha! | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Tue Oct 02 1990 12:04 | 6 |
|
Chicken sh*t!! 8^)
Steve
|
28.709 | I'll take plenty of pictures :-) | AKOV06::DCARR | Office Politics as usual... :-( | Tue Oct 02 1990 12:36 | 10 |
| The "clutch game" is going to be game one, Stewart v. Clemens...
Although I really don't think its going to matter - the A's just have
too many horses...
But, they are hurtin' horses, and the Sox have Tony C. going for them,
and, most important of all, by brother is in Texas for the month and is
certain that the Sox will win the series and have the parade while he
can't be here!
ML
|
28.710 | what? we have a shot? | UPWARD::HEISER | ultimate, underlyin', no denyin' motivation | Tue Oct 02 1990 12:57 | 3 |
| Who in Oakland is hurtin'?
Mike
|
28.711 | no neck problems (they've never had to look back) | AIMHI::DONNELLY | Dare to be diffident | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:10 | 3 |
| Rickey - lots of nagging injuries (ie hip, thigh)
Carney - back (mucho cortisone)
Jose - back, mind
|
28.712 | | BUILD::MORGAN | | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:12 | 13 |
| Re: .710 (Mike)
Canseco's back is not right. He doesn't have many homers over the past
few months. I believe Henderson's thumb is bothering him. Dave
Henderson might not make it back from knee surgery, but could be a
right handed DH. Of course, he's been replaced by Willie McGee so that
loss probably balances out.
The A's didn't have Rickey Henderson when they swept the Sox in the '87
ALCS, which is pretty scary. I certainly wouldn't put any money on the
Sox should they make it, but hey, there's always hope!
Steve
|
28.713 | better than Boggs | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:46 | 7 |
|
ok here's a few in no particular order: Ricky Henderson, Kirby Puckett, Kevin
Mitchell, Alan Trammel, Cal Ripken, George Brett, Willie McGee, Barry Bonds,
Lenny Dykstra, Fred McGriff, Robin Yount, Barry Bonilla, Tony Gynn, Will Clark,
Eddie Murray, Ryne Sandberg, Andre Dawson, Andre Galliarga etc...
mike
|
28.714 | Earth to Mike..Earth to Mike.. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:52 | 7 |
|
I said 3rd baseman!!!! Len Dykstra you can't be serious.
Steve
|
28.715 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Tue Oct 02 1990 14:13 | 14 |
|
and I said I was refering to everyday ballplayers not just 3rd basemen. You
called me out you got your answer. Hell i don't follow baseball well enough
that I could even name 10 third basemen.
Dysktra is a solid outfield, with power and speed at the plate and on the
bases. While this year has been his best he has generally hit around 300
for his career so yes I'm serious. Boggs posess little power and no speed,
he also isn't that solid in the field.
he's better than he was 5 years ago but it would be hard not to be. Just
playing everyday would force a guy to improve...
mike
|
28.716 | Well I meant 3rd baseman! So there! thppptt 8^) | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Tue Oct 02 1990 14:23 | 10 |
|
I guess I misread your note Mike. But If your saying Boggs isn't
one to put up great power number's your right. He *is* solid in
the field in my opinion. When Dyksta (tm) can string together a
few years like the one he's just had then we'll talk. Boggs may
not hit for power but he sure can hit for average and get on base.
Now if someone could hit 35-40 homers behind Boggs..
Steve
|
28.717 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Tue Oct 02 1990 14:54 | 13 |
|
True Steve for Lenny it has been a monster year. Ok let's say their fielding
is equal for argument's sake, Boggs has the higher batting average but I feel
Lenny's extra power output and speed makes up for the difference in BA. Like
I said I believe Lenny is close to a career .300 hitter so he's no slouch for
average either. The you have to consider the fact that I like Lenny and detest
Boggs as wimpy I'd rather walk kind of guy and you can then clearly see where
I'm coming from...
;^)
mike
|
28.718 | Dykstra's only edge is in steals | FREE::GOGUEN | BoSox magic number is 1 | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:53 | 14 |
| Dykstra isn't close to .300 for his career. He's had a career
"half-year" this year, and that's IT.......
Power?? HA.. even in '87, when Boggs hit 24, Lenny only had 10.
G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB CS E AVG
'87: 132 431 86 123 37 3 10 43 40 67 27 7 3 .285
'88: 126 429 57 116 19 3 8 33 30 43 30 8 1 .270
'89: 146 511 66 121 32 4 7 32 60 53 30 12 4 .237
Dykstra this year is approaching Boggs' second worst year, when Wade
hit .325........
-- dg
|
28.719 | Ten Best 3B? And there's no trophy? | AKOV06::DCARR | HOPEFULLY, you can call me Carr-nac | Tue Oct 02 1990 15:59 | 16 |
| I can come close... I can name 7:
Matt Williams, SF; Kelly Gruber, TOR; Tim Wallach, MON; Chris Sabo,
CIN; Howard Johnson, NYM; Gary Sheffield, MLW; Brook Jacoby, CLE...
Go haid, bash away...
And FWIW, talk about a backhanded compliment: "One of the best 10 third
basemen"... might as well say he's one of the 10 best
chicken-eating-skirt-chasing-slow-white-man-selfish ballplayers in
history! WTF!?!?
(BTW, I just had to put that "selfish" line in there - just to keep the
conversation LIVELY :-)
ML
|
28.720 | | FREE::GOGUEN | BoSox magic number is 1 | Tue Oct 02 1990 16:01 | 8 |
| > Matt Williams, SF; Kelly Gruber, TOR; Tim Wallach, MON; Chris Sabo,
> CIN; Howard Johnson, NYM; Gary Sheffield, MLW; Brook Jacoby, CLE...
Well, you got 3, Williams, Gruber, and HoJo.....
Jacoby?? gimme a break....
-- dg
|
28.721 | Sheffield is bad defensively...bad, bad, bad | DECWET::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Tue Oct 02 1990 17:20 | 8 |
| Even though I am, by no means, a defender of Wade Boggs, to say Gary SHeffield
is a better 3rd baseman than Boggs is showing either a lack of knowledge about
the game or a lack of observation of garry Sheffield attempting to play 3rd
base.
He gives new meaning to the phrase "Matador the ball".
Metz
|
28.722 | | GOLF::KINGR | PREPARE to die earth scum!!!!!!!!!!! | Tue Oct 02 1990 19:40 | 4 |
| After 5 Jays 1 Balt 0 black 1 hitter so far
Chicago 1 Boston 1 after 4
REK
|
28.723 | | AYOV28::DHUNTER | | Wed Oct 03 1990 03:31 | 5 |
| Jays 2 O's 1
Sox 2 Chi 3
It's down to the wire - whose pitching?
|
28.724 | Game #162 | BUILD::MORGAN | | Wed Oct 03 1990 06:02 | 20 |
| > It's down to the wire - whose pitching?
W-L ERA
CHI Fernandez 5-4 3.95
BOS Boddicker 16-8 3.42
TOR Stieb 18-6 2.95
BAL McDonald 8-5 2.45
I should have known all along it would come down to this, and maybe
even tomorrow. Should there be a playoff game, in Toronto tomorrow,
it'll be Clemens against probably Stottlemyre. Of course, that'll
severely screw up my plans to go fishing, but why do I have a feeling
that it's going to be so? The Red Sox are the only team to be involved
in the American League's only two playoff games. They've lost both.
Mike, stick to basketball. You don't know what you're talking about
when it comes to balls and bats! :-)
Steve
|
28.725 | but Lenny split time with Mookie.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Wed Oct 03 1990 07:10 | 5 |
|
Well Steve, I do know this the Red Soxs, never ever do anything easy.
As much as I bash them, I do hope for my friends that they pull it out.
mike
|
28.726 | You got that right, Mike. Nuthin's ever easy... | CRBOSS::DERRY | Looks like I'm going Republican... | Wed Oct 03 1990 07:32 | 1 |
|
|
28.727 | Boggs aint clutch either. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Wed Oct 03 1990 07:57 | 12 |
|
Figures. I went to the game last night. It was the most important sox
game I have ever attended and they were the best seats I ever had,
lower box, sec 75, 8 rows from the field. AND THE STIFF MORGAN BRINGS
IN DENIIS LAMP!!!!!!! ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Neddless to say they lost with Lamp giving up the game winning hits.
Oh well what should have I expected anyway!! At least the seats were
free, and the game was exciting. Ugh..
Steve
|
28.728 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Wed Oct 03 1990 08:00 | 6 |
|
re: -1
Yeah... and when Morgan went to the mound to talk to Lamp,
the fans were screaming to leave him in...
|
28.729 | | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Wed Oct 03 1990 08:03 | 3 |
| ...because Murphy was warming up.
daryll
|
28.730 | Oh were you there too? | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Wed Oct 03 1990 08:05 | 9 |
|
Not from where I was sitting! The fans were screaming not to put
in the ultimate stiff....Rob Murphy. You should of heard the
bleacher crew moan when he got up in the pen! Poor guy.
Steve
|
28.731 | ??? | MILPND::VLASAK | Flatliners for Mass...YES on #3 | Wed Oct 03 1990 09:08 | 5 |
|
What's the matter with Reardon?
Bob V.
|
28.732 | | CAM::WAY | Happiness is a loose ruck | Wed Oct 03 1990 09:19 | 28 |
| Rob "The Caterer" Murphy....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I know what's going to happen. It came to me in a dream....
There I was, standing on a grassy knoll, this bright light surrounding
me. (No, there weren't any dead relatives!)
This voice says to me "Choose wisely", and then shows me two things.
The first is Elle MacPherson. The second is the Red Sox in a playoff
game against Toronto.
So, I'm standing there, pondering this really tough decision, and
finally, I figure that even if I choose the Sox, there's no way they'll
ever win the Series.... why do I say that? Because over on the next
hill, another voice is talking to Bill Buckner, saying "choose wisely"
and I hear old Billy Buck talking about the Sox...
So I says to myself, go with Elle.
So I pick Elle, and as we prepare to ride off into the sunset, I
glance back at the Red Sox game just in time to see Junior F***ing Felix
putting the game winner outta the park...
You have my word on it....
Chainsaw
|
28.733 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | See ya in Tampa in January! | Wed Oct 03 1990 09:27 | 12 |
|
From: AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Donald J. Robichaud ML 5-5/E72 Ext 3-7111" 3-OCT-1990 10:27
To: MSBOS::DINSMORE
Subj:
Personally I hope there's a playoff game so Roger can pitch a
9 inning shutout and shut you, Mike, Groaner etc. up for the rest of the year.
/Don
whats this /don???
|
28.734 | | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Wed Oct 03 1990 09:29 | 9 |
| Hasn't Jacoby been relegated to 1B?
Well Mike, with your admission that you don't follow baseball much I can
now understand why you say some of the things you do ;^}.
Your fishing trip would be screwed up by a playoff game?!? Just think
what this does to the Sox rotation should they meet the A's. Boddicker
is pitching tonight and Clemens is pencilled in for the playoff game.
That means that they both might have to pitch on 3 days rest.
|
28.735 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Wed Oct 03 1990 10:03 | 6 |
| Posting mail without my permission eh Dinz? I always knew you
were a lowlife. But I'll stand by what I said. If there is a playoff
game Clemens will pitch the game of his life, and MikeC will call
it a semi-clutch win.
/Don
|
28.736 | they'll win tonight | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Wed Oct 03 1990 10:30 | 4 |
|
No Don I'd give him a clutch win but I doubt he'd get it. ;^)
but I really don't see it happening either....
|
28.737 | | DECXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Wed Oct 03 1990 10:41 | 12 |
| Hmmm, perhaps last night may be the start of something new......
Digger's KOD!!!
Stay home, Digger!
:*)
Lee
|
28.738 | | GOOBER::ROSS | And baby makes four | Wed Oct 03 1990 11:04 | 17 |
| What hurts the Sox most is two things:
Greenwell and Burks swinging at the first pitch late in the game
Quintana's lack of speed getting down the line on DP grounders
I think the Sox should seriously consider switching the batting order
around tonight.
Boggs, Reed, Greenwell, Burks, Brunansky, Evans, Pena, Quintana, Rivera
The White Sox are an interesting team... I think they will drop back some
next year because they've been too good in one run games this year. I like
the ChiSox outfield of Calderon, Johnson, Sosa {if he could hit .280, he'd
put up numbers like Ruben Sierra last year}. Ventura has a fantastic arm
{as we saw on that foul ball throw he made}. Frank Thomas looks like a
sure thing. 1991 will be a readjustment year because everyone will be ready
for them. 1992 might be a title year.
|
28.739 | Gotta take 'em tonight | BUILD::MORGAN | | Wed Oct 03 1990 12:14 | 21 |
| Ya gotta like those ChiSox uniforms.
But on to more important matters. I don't think you'll see any changes
in the batting order tonight, Doug. The manager isn't swift enough to
think that change can sometimes create good things. I'm not saying he
should change the order at this point in the season, but he's pretty
much gone with the same thing since the All-Star break, give or take
throwing Marshall in there on occassion.
Greenwell's biggest flaw at the plate is his lack of patience.
We won't be seeing Clemens until game 3 of the ALCS if there's a
playoff game tomorrow. We might not even see Boddicker in games 1 or 2
should the Sox make it. It'll depend on how long he has to go tonight.
If they can win tonight they'll have two days off to rest Anderson and
Reardon.
Dana Kiecker just might be opening up the ALCS on Saturday night.
Howzat grab ya?
Steve
|
28.740 | | 12354::J_HALPIN | The Delaware: river, bay or ocean??? | Wed Oct 03 1990 12:25 | 10 |
|
Can anybody give me a reasonable explaination on why Gray was pulled
after pitching two perfect innings??? I know he is has been used for short
releif all year but the way he pitched the top of the 10th (Other than that
one pitch to Fisk <shudder>) I would have brought him back to start the 11th,
and pulled him after he gave up his first hit!!!
JimH
|
28.741 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Wed Oct 03 1990 12:53 | 14 |
| ================================================================================
Note 28.740 The Boston Red Sox Note 740 of 740
12354::J_HALPIN "The Delaware: river, bay or ocean" 10 lines 3-OCT-1990 11:25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
� Can anybody give me a reasonable explaination on why Gray was pulled
�JimH
Yes, because Joe "Bonehaid" Morgan is the manager.
/Don
|
28.742 | | 12354::J_HALPIN | The Delaware: river, bay or ocean??? | Wed Oct 03 1990 13:09 | 7 |
|
/Don, That the only answer I could come up with. I was hoping maybe
there was another reason :-(
JimH
|
28.743 | | REFINE::ASHE | Homey don't play that... | Wed Oct 03 1990 13:22 | 2 |
| I wish the BoSox lost tonight on a Minnie Minoso HR.... sigh, thanks
Fay-baby....
|
28.745 | tonight's a must win in more than 1 way... | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Wed Oct 03 1990 13:35 | 16 |
| > We won't be seeing Clemens until game 3 of the ALCS if there's a
> playoff game tomorrow. We might not even see Boddicker in games 1 or 2
Boddicker would have to pitch on 3 days rest to make Game 2 of the ALCS.
If there's a playoff game, and Clemens needs 4 days rest between starts,
Clemens only possible starts in the ALCS would be games 3 and 7.
I thought the Red Sox only chance against Oakland was if Clemens pitched
3 of the 7 games, but that would require that he pitch on 3 days rest
twice. Given his recent shoulder problems, that's probably not likely.
They most likely will need 3 of 4 at home (they're lucky to have the
home field advantage in the AL East this year) to take it.
Joe
|
28.746 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Hit the ice and score the winner! | Wed Oct 03 1990 21:30 | 1 |
| Red Sox clinch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
28.747 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Thu Oct 04 1990 07:01 | 3 |
| Anyone notice we have the same 4 teams in the playoffs that were
there in 1975! And Oakland as defending champeens.
Denny
|
28.748 | | STARVU::MACGREGOR | DECview3D engineer - DTN 287-3318 | Thu Oct 04 1990 07:07 | 6 |
| Boston clinced with a 3-1 victory last night, while Toronto lost
3-2 just five minutes later. It has been announced that Dana Kiecker
will pitch Game 2 of the ALCS, Boddicker Game 3. Greg Harris will
pitch Game 4 if Clemens can't come back after Game 1.
The Wizard
|
28.749 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Oct 04 1990 07:17 | 5 |
| Prediction:
Dinz and Wardle will jump on the Oakland bandwagon.
Nostra/DONus
|
28.750 | Bring on dem A's. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Thu Oct 04 1990 07:52 | 10 |
|
Congrats to the Sox! I knew they'd do it all along!
ya right!
Steve
|
28.751 | I woke up and everything was OK!!! I think? | 12354::J_HALPIN | The Delaware: river, bay or ocean??? | Thu Oct 04 1990 08:00 | 15 |
|
Last night, with 2 outs in the ninth, nobody on, and and 0-2 count all
I could think of was Calvin Schaldi (sp?) pitching to Gary Carter in '86!!! I
jumped up and yelled at the TV, "HEY REARDON, DON'T THROW A MEATBALL DOWN
THE MIDDLE OF THE PLATE!!!". Too late.... hanging curve ball - line drive single
into centerfield, a hit batsman, and a long drive to right field...
arrggghhh... Stephen King is in the stands, He was interviewed on TV before
the game... ohhhhh nnnnoooo!!!!!!....
THANK YOU TOM BRUNANSKY!!!!
JimH :-)
|
28.752 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Hit the ice and score the winner! | Thu Oct 04 1990 08:07 | 2 |
| From the mail I received this morning, Dinz has already
jumped on the Oakland Bandwagon!
|
28.753 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Believe!!! | Thu Oct 04 1990 08:31 | 9 |
|
The Stephen King interview was pretty funny. He was asked if he were
there to write a story about the Sox, and he replied something like
"Hmmmm... No....but all my stories *do* have happy endings...." and
then he grinned into the camera and fluttered his eyebrows in his best
Bugs Bunny 'ain't I a stinkah' impersonation.
Dickster
|
28.754 | Congrats to the Sox | MPO::MCFALL | He was born a pauper to a pawn | Thu Oct 04 1990 08:53 | 5 |
| Congrats to the Sox for winning 88 games. To their credit, they
beat the team they had to beat 10 out of 13 times. They deserve this
pennant simply for that.
Jim M
|
28.755 | 20-20 hindsight in calling the big games for Sox ffans | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Nuke the New Kids!! | Thu Oct 04 1990 09:30 | 9 |
| >If there is a playoff
>game Clemens will pitch the game of his life, and MikeC will call
>it a semi-clutch win.
Yeah, but now that he's pitching game 1 of the Oakland series, if he
loses to Stewart, /Don and the crowd will be saying it wasn't a big
game.
Dan
|
28.756 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Oct 04 1990 09:38 | 3 |
| It will be a *big* game win or lose Mr "Closet Pirates Fan".
/Don
|
28.757 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | | Thu Oct 04 1990 09:53 | 6 |
| re .755
and if he wins wwe'll here you and Mike Childs say it wasn't a clutch
game. Did you know that Don Mattingly has never won a big game?
Bruce
|
28.758 | I'll even eat crow if it makes you happy | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lord she had a way to fool me | Thu Oct 04 1990 09:58 | 5 |
|
No Bruce, you'll here me say it's about time that he finally delievered
and actually pitched up to all the hype....
mike
|
28.759 | It's /Don & gang who waffles on big games. Not me. | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Nuke the New Kids!! | Thu Oct 04 1990 10:12 | 6 |
| >and if he wins wwe'll here you ... say it wasn't a clutch
>game.
On what flawed logic do you base that?
Dan
|
28.760 | Tony Pe�a for Red Sox MVP! | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Oct 04 1990 10:13 | 4 |
| Hey let's give credit where credit's due. All this happened
because Pe�a threw those chairs when he did. Congrats Pe�a!
/Don
|
28.761 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Oct 04 1990 10:23 | 3 |
| � -< It's /Don & gang who waffles on big games. Not me. >-
Prove it Mr. Wallace the Waffle Whiffer.
|
28.762 | Is it a sign that the curse is over? | AUSTIN::MACNEAL | Bo don't know rugby! | Thu Oct 04 1990 10:24 | 7 |
| The St. Louis Cardinals finished in last place in the NL East this
season.
The last time that happened, the Boston Red Sox defeated the Pittsburgh
Pirates in the World Series - the year was 1918.
What the heck, it's as crazy as the Curse of the Bambino
|
28.763 | | WMOIS::JBARROWS | Hit the ice and score the winner! | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:12 | 9 |
| Another eerie thought:
A few weeks back, the announcers said that the last time the Yankees
finished last in the AL East and the Sox were in first, the Sox
took the W.S.!
RE: Curse of the Bambino.....this is the year! Hell, if the Bruins
can get rid of the Montr�al curse, its time the Sox get rid of
theirs.
|
28.765 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Go Oakland | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:36 | 3 |
| Ha.. keep reaching for little scenarios.. back in blah, blah,
blah
|
28.766 | Dropped Last Out??? | CSC32::J_HENSON | It's just the same, only different | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:44 | 18 |
| I've been reading this confernce for a while, but have never wrote into
it. Well, now there's a question that I want answered but no one else
has asked it. So, here goes.
I watched the last inning of last night's game on ESPN. When Brunanski
made the sliding catch for the last out, the ESPN announcer said that
he dropped the ball, but that it was called out anyway. I kept waiting
for a definitive replay, but it never came. And after a few minutes,
everyone seemed to forget it.
Am I the only one who heard this??? Did he drop the ball, or did the
announcer just stick his foot in his mouth? From what I saw, it looked
like a catch to me. However, the tail end of the play was obscured by
the stands.
Comments?
Jerry
|
28.767 | | FSOA::JHENDRY | John Hendry, DTN 292-2170 | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:46 | 6 |
| The initial confusion came because the umpire initially signalled fair
ball instead of calling an out. It was down deep in the right field
corner and Brunansky was on the ground, so it was unclear at first what
had happened.
John
|
28.768 | Air out those Sox.... | TALLIS::STEVENSON | Linda Stevenson | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:50 | 13 |
|
Hi Jerry,
I watched the game on Channel 38 last night and the announcer said that
Brunanski caught the ball, but we couldn't see it because of the
fans...
Sherlock
PS. Who is sitting through a day of misery listening to the Dinz and
how Oakland will CRUSH them.... I'm thinking of making another bet
with him !!!
|
28.769 | | DECWET::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Thu Oct 04 1990 11:55 | 10 |
|
In the Sox conference it was mentioned that he caught the ball but got up and
chased after his hat before the crowd grabbed him/it. It looked from the camera
angle that he was chasing after the ball...
ESPN then compounded the situation by showing the home plate umpire looking
out into right field like he was going to overturn the call.
Metz
|
28.770 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Believe!!! | Thu Oct 04 1990 12:52 | 29 |
|
Getting back to Stephen King, fans will know that he always mentions
the Red Sox somewhere in his horror stories, sorta like Alfred
Hitchcock would make subtle appearances in his own films. Some of
King's less subtle allusions to the Red Sox have been:
"The Dead Zone" - Life in the Red Sox front office.
"Firestarter" - Life in the Red Sox bullpen.
"The Stands" - Self-explanatory
"It" - Allegorical allusion to the sale of Babe Ruth. "It"
keeps coming back to to haunt them.
"Cujo" - Dog goes on mad rampage after getting hit with a
bat; contracts deadly "pennant fever."
"Yawkey's Lot" - Blood-sucking owners prey on unsuspecting fans.
"Carrie" - A telekinetic causes baseballs to mysteriously fly
into net, past catchers, and through first-baseman's
legs.
"Misery" _ Life as a Red Sox fan.
Dickster
|
28.771 | HAHAHAHAHAHAHA� | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Oct 04 1990 13:40 | 1 |
|
|
28.772 | Bruno for guvna... | CURIE::WENTZELL | Pennant Fever sets in.... | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:10 | 12 |
| RE: The Catch
I was sitting on top of the centerfield wall (in section 35). From there is
was OBVIOUS that Bruno CAUGHT the ball. He went into his slide, I held my
breath (actually, I don't think I had taken a breath since Reardon hit the
previous batter), and watched the ball fall into his glove, which he
immediately held up in the air. Then he started fumbling for his hat, which I
think some lucky fan wound up with.
It was amazin'!
Scott
|
28.773 | A fitting end to Dan's nightmare baseball season | GOOBER::ROSS | And baby makes four | Thu Oct 04 1990 14:24 | 5 |
| The greatest thing about last night's win was that during the last
two innings, if I closed my eyes just slightly, I could see Dan
Schneider was closing the door on the White Sox, leading the Boston to the
AL East crown. A shudder of perverse pleasure went thru me....
|
28.774 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Go Oakland | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:12 | 11 |
| doug,
where have ya been? Did ya notice Don Mattinglys batting average
since he came ogg injured list?
dinz
|
28.775 | Yes, Football season started early but... | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Nuke the New Kids!! | Thu Oct 04 1990 15:53 | 10 |
| > -< A fitting end to Dan's nightmare baseball season >-
Umm, but for some reason, the whole thing didn't bother me. I
accepted the Yanks fate a long time ago, I enjoyed the way the Sox
front office has bumbled so many things, and let's not forget how they
turned a 6� game lead into a 1� game deficit, then blamed the media.
They gave me something to look forward to, still pulled it out and now
as a reward for their trouble face the A's.
Dan
|
28.776 | just a question | COBRA::DINSMORE | Go Oakland | Fri Oct 05 1990 08:05 | 3 |
| Whens the last time Clemens won a big playoff game?
dinz
|
28.777 | back problems will cut his power output | GOOBER::ROSS | And baby makes four | Fri Oct 05 1990 08:06 | 12 |
| > <<< Note 28.774 by COBRA::DINSMORE "Go Oakland" >>>
> doug,
> where have ya been? Did ya notice Don Mattinglys batting average
> since he came ogg injured list?
> dinz
I've been at a customer site for the past month with only occasional access
to the net.
Yes, I noticed. I also noticed that Wade Boggs had more HR over the
same period {1}. Don Mattingly - a Punch n' Judy slap hitter. Just
doesn't have the same ring to it as "best player in baseball".
|
28.779 | | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 05 1990 08:16 | 7 |
|
> Whens the last time Clemens won a big playoff game?
1986.
glenn
|
28.780 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Go Oakland | Fri Oct 05 1990 08:55 | 5 |
|
thanks glenn
dinz
|
28.781 | When's the last time NY played a Playoff game? | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:19 | 6 |
| <<< Note 28.776 by COBRA::DINSMORE "Go Oakland" >>>
-< just a question >-
> Whens the last time Clemens won a big playoff game?
Are there any playoff games that aren't BIG?
|
28.782 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Go Oakland | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:20 | 0 |
28.783 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:37 | 8 |
|
> Whens the last time Clemens won a big playoff game?
� Are there any playoff games that aren't BIG?
Yeah Daryll when Roger Clemens wins it.
/Don
|
28.784 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:40 | 2 |
| Anyone know who the Yanks play this weekend?
Denny
|
28.785 | | MPO::ST_ONGE | | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:49 | 5 |
| Re: .784
With themselves ;-)
John
|
28.786 | Boggs Believes, but calls Margo just in case :^) | MPO::MCFALL | He was born a pauper to a pawn | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:55 | 11 |
| > Re: .784
> With themselves ;-)
John, remember, I know where you sit :^)
Dinz, why are you egging on these Sox fans? Most of us Yankee
fans would like to sidle off quietly into the offseason, licking our
wounds, and hoping that Gene Michael and George Bradley don't mortgage
the farm system with questionable trades this offseason :^)
Jim M
|
28.787 | | COBRA::DINSMORE | Go Oakland | Fri Oct 05 1990 09:57 | 9 |
| jim m,
As i told Daryll in mail, its a valid question, guess my so called
reputation in here, follws me again down devils way
dinz
|
28.788 | | SALEM::DODA | No scalping at Sinead O'Connor concerts | Fri Oct 05 1990 10:07 | 7 |
| Never said it wasn't a valid question. It did have a "?" at the
end didn't it?
It's just that I have a hard time believing that you asked it
just out of curiosity....
daryll
|
28.789 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers... Pants for |CENSORED|s | Fri Oct 05 1990 11:01 | 1 |
| Dinz you should've remembered anyway, you were a Sox fan then...
|
28.790 | punching the wall | WAV14::LEARYM | | Fri Oct 05 1990 11:14 | 12 |
| Hope St. Roger's hand is ok after punching the wall in Joe M,organ's
ofc on Tuesday night. Seems that Mr.Articulation was upset that the
players would not get a 30 minute privare celebration(Commish only
allows 15 min.)
Asked if he had reprimanded Clemens,Joe Morgan replied sic, "Didn't
have to,the wall did!"
However,he's still a great pitcher as long as he keeps his mouth shut.
Go Sox
|
28.791 | Break Up The A's | SHALOT::HUNT | Wyld Stallyns Rules | Mon Oct 08 1990 11:02 | 8 |
| Boy, you can hear a pin drop in this note today.
Thud, crash, bang ...
The Sox are overmatched, outmanned, outgunned, and overwhelmed. And
the National League winner is merely next in line.
Bob Hunt
|
28.792 | The fat lady is clearing her throat.. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Mon Oct 08 1990 12:06 | 8 |
|
You said it Bob, the sox have GLARING weaknesses that are really
showing in this series. I thought they would hit better tho'.
They need a good performance out of Boddicker to save face.
Steve
|
28.793 | | PNO::HEISER | ultimate, underlyin', no denyin' motivation | Mon Oct 08 1990 13:17 | 4 |
| The Sox have an advantage with Boddicker facing Moore, but I'm not
convinced that Boston's offense can outproduce Oakland's offense!
Mike
|
28.794 | | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Mon Oct 08 1990 16:09 | 14 |
| > Anyone know who the Yanks play this weekend?
Anyone know if the Sox played this weekend ? I sure as hell didn't see 'em. :^)
Seriously, Game 1 was so big for them. Now they have 5 left (maybe), and
Clemens will appear only once, and Boddicker twice. Meanwhile, the A's
could pitch Stewart twice and Welch once (they would be back-to-back
if the series returns to Boston). If it goes 7, Stewart and Welch will
appear 5 times, Clemens and Boddicker four times. Clemens' arm problems,
and Boddicker having to pitch the last game of the season really hurt
Boston's chances.
Joe
|
28.795 | 72 GONGS..."still gong-ing, and gong-ing" | FDCV07::GARBARINO | | Thu Oct 11 1990 08:49 | 5 |
| I really didn't want to do this, but when I asked myself, "would Boston
fans be as gracious if the Yanks got swept ?", the answer was always "NO".
Joe
|
28.796 | didn't wanna do this either... | SHIRE::FINEUC1 | | Thu Oct 11 1990 10:40 | 10 |
| Well, Joe, I didn't want to do this either, but I recall writing in here that
after giving everything they had to squeak by the Jays, the Red Slobs would
role over and play dead for the As and that the Jays would have given the As a
much better series....
Oh well, the mighty Jays broke the attendance record by a long way (never saw
it mentioned in here by the way - hmmm, interesting) and that will perhaps
be more rememberable. What a sports town TO is!
rick ellis
|
28.797 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Dockers...Pants for |CENSORED|s | Thu Oct 11 1990 10:55 | 7 |
| If the Jays had given the Red Sox a better series a couple of
weekends ago they would've played the A's. I think I've finally
figured out the Doc. After next year the chances of Roger pitching
in *HOUSTON* are pretty good. Doc is just laying the groundwork
early.
/Don
|
28.798 | And the games weren't as tight | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 11 1990 11:03 | 6 |
|
Yeah, and the Jays gave them a *much* better series last year, too.
(I know, I know, they did win *one* game.)
glenn
|
28.799 | J's vs A's = Sox vs A's | CURIE::WENTZELL | Looks like rain... | Thu Oct 11 1990 11:43 | 16 |
| How anyone can say the Jays would have given the As a better series is beyond
me. Obviously the Jays couldn't even do what it took to get there. They lost 2
of 3 to the Sox then 2 of 3 to the Os down the stretch. The Sox vs. Jays would
be a good series (could go either way), the As vs. American League East is a
blowout IMO.
I'll be interested to see how well the NL Champ does against the As pitching,
especially given the fact that they haven't faced each other during the season.
And I'd be willing to bet LaRussa and company are just loving the scouting
opportunity they are being given by a long(er) NLCS.
Well, time to utter that familiar phrase that should be a New England sports
trademark - "Just wait 'till next year!"
Scott
|
28.800 | the serious baseball talk doesn't take place here | DECWIN::JARETH::YANKOWSKAS | | Thu Oct 11 1990 11:57 | 9 |
| re .796:
> Oh well, the mighty Jays broke the attendance record by a long way
> (never saw it mentioned in here by the way - hmmm, interesting)
Rick, see topic 163 in ASABET::BASEBALL.
py
|
28.801 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 11 1990 15:09 | 4 |
|
Have the Sox ever won a playoff game that Clemens started?
Does anyone know what the team record is in playoff (ALCS and WS)
games started by Roger Clemens?
|
28.802 | does anybody CARE?????????????? | PFSVAX::JACOB | Cain Tudj Dis | Thu Oct 11 1990 22:00 | 5 |
|
JaKe
|
28.803 | | WMOIS::RIEU_D | Read his lips...Know new taxes! | Fri Oct 12 1990 07:29 | 4 |
| Since diviaional play started in 1969, EVERY TEAM BUT ONE has
finished ahead of all teams in it's div. The ONLY exception is:
The Indians have NEVER finished ahead of the Red Sox.
Denny
|
28.804 | | SHIRE::FINEUC1 | | Fri Oct 12 1990 07:58 | 18 |
| >> <<< Note 28.800 by DECWIN::JARETH::YANKOWSKAS >>>
>> -< the serious baseball talk doesn't take place here >-
Thanks py,
I noticed that the serious baseball talk does not take place here, in fact no
serious talk takes place here whatsoever, which is why I do my noting here. ;^)
Anyway, I can't imagine why I put that note in as I usually can't stand it
when people say so-and-so would have given a better game/series to so-and-so.
Fack is, /Don had it right a few notes ago: Jays had they're /chance during
the big confrontation in Fenway a few weeks ago, and they blew it.
'nuff said
have fun, rick ellis
|
28.805 | A couple more | COGITO::HILL | | Fri Oct 12 1990 10:57 | 4 |
| re .803
The Texas Rangers and Seattle Mariners are the only other Major league
teams that have never won a divisional title. Everyone else (both
leagues) has won at least once.
|
28.806 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Sat Oct 13 1990 09:20 | 6 |
|
.803
Thank you for answering my question. Roger Clemens can NOT win the big
game. PERIOD!
|
28.807 | | SALEM::DODA | Fryar & Dykes : Twin Geeks | Mon Oct 15 1990 08:46 | 13 |
| <<< Note 28.806 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
.803
> Thank you for answering my question. Roger Clemens can NOT win the big
> game. PERIOD!
Clemens was the winner of Game 7 in the 1986 ALCS.
Hope this helps.
daryll
|
28.808 | You've got to at least try, to fail... | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 15 1990 08:54 | 19 |
|
> Thank you for answering my question. Roger Clemens can NOT win the big
> game. PERIOD!
He won a couple of big ones this year, most notably the game against
Toronto that for all intents sealed the division title (which is all
the Sox were realistically going to win this year with this team). I
was there and it was quite a thrill to see it. Even the national media
thought it was quite a heroic effort.
Unfortunately, if you're a Cleveland Indians fan born after 1960, you
haven't seen your team in a big game in your *lifetime* (Indians have
not even finished within 10 games of the leader since 1959). I can't
imagine what that might feel like, and wouldn't want to know either.
But at least none of the players can be accused of not coming through
in the big ones, so I guess they're not chokers...
glenn
|
28.809 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Mon Oct 15 1990 11:55 | 5 |
|
Bottom line, regardless of how you try to pan off Clemens inability
to win the big game on the Indians, Clemens is not a big game pitcher.
Sure, he'll get you to the playoffs, but then its good night... as
he becomes subpar W/L wise in games he starts...
|
28.810 | I think Greenwall is to BLAM (tm) | CNTROL::CHILDS | one nine hundred YT Guilt | Mon Oct 15 1990 12:38 | 5 |
|
and he's now 7-1 lifetime against Stewart. Think he has nightmares of Big
Dave?
mike
|
28.811 | Play with numbers all you want, on a *team* the man will win | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 15 1990 12:44 | 18 |
|
> Sure, he'll get you to the playoffs, but then its good night... as
> he becomes subpar W/L wise in games he starts...
^^^^^^
Subpar as compared to what? The Red Sox are .000 in playoff games
against the A's with and without Clemens. You can't go lower than
that.
Even still, I will admit that Clemens has not excelled in postseason
play. He's been hot and cold. As a matter of fact, his record is very
similar to another Texan's, Nolan Ryan.
I still say that if someone (it may not even be the Red Sox) puts half
a team around the guy in the 90's, he'll carry them to the division
title and then with some support (no one wins alone) all the way.
glenn
|
28.812 | can't win the big one tag is bull | MFGMEM::MIOLA | Phantom | Mon Oct 15 1990 14:08 | 16 |
|
This Clemens can't win in the playoffs is a joke.
WHAT IS HIS ERA?
He lost the 1'st game 1-0 on a run that he didn't allow.......
boy he stinks.
This last game he did give up 3 runs, but two came in on a double from
a cold pitcher.
To the best of my knowledge, Roger has been very effective, its always
been the bats and relievers that have been the trouble.
Lou
|
28.813 | Your basic dishonest ::SPORTS treachery... | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 15 1990 14:36 | 16 |
|
> To the best of my knowledge, Roger has been very effective, its always
> been the bats and relievers that have been the trouble.
Hence Mr. Gronowski's shady wording of the question: What is *his
team's* record in postseason games Clemens has started (because Clemens
himself has been neither good or bad, just around average overall)?
Missing in the answer is the fact that once each in the '86 ALCS
(Schiraldi), '86 World Series (Schiraldi again), '88 ALCS (Lee Smith),
and '90 ALCS (Larry Andersen/et al) Clemens has pitched very fine
games in which the bullpen blew the game. Most champions have had good
bullpens to sew these kind of games up, but since Clemens doesn't and
hasn't been able to pitch nine innings in each, he's a choker.
glenn
|
28.814 | | RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO | The 24 Hour Church of Elvis | Mon Oct 15 1990 15:08 | 8 |
| Glenn,
I thought Clemens' ERA was 4.10 in post season - considerbly higher
than his regular season ERA. He's pitched well, but hasn't been
the post season performer of say, Dave Stewert, who's ERA has dropped
in the post season.
JD
|
28.815 | | CAM::WAY | Beaten like a redheaded stepchild... | Mon Oct 15 1990 15:19 | 20 |
| Personally, I've always felt that putting the total burden on the
pitcher in *any* game is kind of going overboard.
I've seen pitchers who didn't have their stuff who were covered by
superb fielding (excepting numerous meatballs which are put outta the
park), and I've seen pitchers who were doing really well get killed
by errors in the field.
Baseball is a team sport. Yes, the pitcher handles the ball more
than anyone else, but even if he shuts out his opponents (throws
a perfect game) and his team produces no offense, you can still
end up out of the money.
People are bashing Roger because, unfortunately, he gives us some
reason to bash him. But don't forget that there are 8 other guys
out there who help give up runs, and who don't produce at the
plate....
JMHO,
'Saw
|
28.816 | The Sox or anyone else could use more like him | DELNI::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Oct 15 1990 15:30 | 16 |
|
> He's pitched well, but hasn't been
> the post season performer of say, Dave Stewert, who's ERA has dropped
> in the post season.
Agreed. I said he's only been average (two poor games in '86 did the
ERA in), but he's pitched some very good games that have been lost to
history. My only point is that he has not been this "big-game choker"
many have made him out to be.
I'm generally not prone to absolutes. I think Stewart has proven he is
the better pitcher year-in, year-out, but that should not detract from
Clemens, not the least reason being the respective teams they play for.
glenn
|
28.817 | mgmt is the problem... clem the scapegoat.... | CSCMA::TIBERIO | | Mon Oct 15 1990 16:28 | 14 |
| roger clemins is a GREAT pitcher....having said that i've exorcised
all the demons of rcaso past....
I'm so mad, let's try stream of consciousness stuff..
he was pissed because mgmt didn't support the team.... goal
incongruence...management wants to maximize $, players want to win...
why didn't they bring up mo? arbitration two yrs down the road.
gutless wonders, gorman, yawkey and harrington.... they don't deserve
to run a club. ... if i were clem i'd be pissed. they put too much
pressure on him by not getting another starter at the beg. of the
year... cheap prix... morgan can't manage for squat.... got i hate
sox mgmt. .... now let me tell you how i really feel....
|
28.818 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Tue Oct 16 1990 11:36 | 5 |
|
re: .810
Must be a typo mike... Clemens in NOT 7-1 lifetime v.s. Stewart!
|
28.819 | definate typo, probably due to braincramp | CNTROL::CHILDS | one nine hundred YT Guilt | Tue Oct 16 1990 15:03 | 1 |
|
|
28.820 | | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in 1991 | Wed Oct 24 1990 15:07 | 5 |
| It was just reported in the Red Sox notes conference that the Sox have
decided not to renew the contract of Dwight Evans.
py
|
28.821 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Ban orange pumpkin garbage bags | Wed Oct 24 1990 15:15 | 9 |
|
I don't believe that after 18(?) years with the club that they're just
going to unceremoniously dump him a la Jim Rice. Did they offer him
the chance to retire? Did he refuse a trade? I just don't get it.
Something tells me there's going to be a lot more to this story, and
it's probably ugly.
Dickster
|
28.822 | sad to say, but losers never change | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:06 | 1 |
|
|
28.823 | He may not have a ring, but Dwight Evans is a winner..... | SASE::SZABO | | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:18 | 1 |
|
|
28.824 | | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:29 | 9 |
| > -< He may not have a ring, but Dwight Evans is a winner..... >-
sorry for the misunderstanding. I was referring to the Red Sox
organization. Some front offices have 'loser' stamped on their
foreheads and it carries down to the field.
A good house cleaning would be good for the Sox and Patriots.
Mike
|
28.825 | I knew that! | SASE::SZABO | | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:34 | 1 |
|
|
28.826 | | DECWET::METZGER | Head Northwest young man.... | Wed Oct 24 1990 16:52 | 24 |
|
Although Evans has been a good player for 18 years I can't find fault with
the management for not picking up his contract for next season. IMHO he should
either retire this off-season or he should have waited until after his back
surgery before he made demands on management if he wanted to stay a Sock.
He's damaged goods and he isn't a spring chicken. From what I've hear he
asked Sox management to make a decision now...I'm sure they would have invited
him to camp next season if he didn't pressure them to make a decision now.
If he can't hack it physically then he shouldn't be playing. The sox management
has a lot bigger problems to worry about then Dewey Evans. (this of couse
assumes that they care about making the franchise a winner and not just a
business that makes money....I haven't seen evidence to prove that they are
interested in doing anything other than making money)
If Evans wants to play next season he can either go to another team or ask them
to let him show up at camp and try and prove he deserves to be retained.
Ain't nothing like a player that refuse to let go after he can't physically
do the job any longer....
Metz
|
28.827 | | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Wed Oct 24 1990 17:03 | 4 |
| Like so many other BoSox players before him, he'll go somewhere else
and become better than he was!
Mike
|
28.828 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | TexasChainsawSquareDanceMassacre | Thu Oct 25 1990 07:13 | 4 |
| When asked if he would play for the Indians Evans said he didn't
think so because he "wanted to play for a contender".
/Don
|
28.829 | The right thing.. | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Thu Oct 25 1990 07:31 | 11 |
|
I think this was a good move for the Sox. It's too bad it had to
happen like this, but I feel it was the right move. Face it, Evans
is 39 and is oft-injured. He would not relegate himself to a
non-starting role, not without alot of grief anyway, and his
supposed second-guessing of Morgan does not help the team in the
least bit. Let's get some fresh horses out there and give them a
chance.
Steve
|
28.830 | | ROCK::GRONOWSKI | the dream is always the same... | Thu Oct 25 1990 07:59 | 5 |
|
When asked if he thought he'd have a better chance winning a
World Championship for another team Evans said "Heck, they haven't
won in Boston since 1918... how could my chances get any worse."
|
28.831 | Evans only man to homer off Olson in 1989 | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Orioles in 1991 | Thu Oct 25 1990 08:08 | 5 |
| I'm sure Gregg Olson isn't sorry to hear the latest news out of
Boston... :-)
py
|
28.832 | My comments in RED_SOX: this *was* a positive move (unusual) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 25 1990 08:20 | 26 |
|
The Red Sox made the right decision for perhaps the wrong reasons. I
was actually somewhat surprised they did pull the trigger, not because
I felt that Evans had enough left to warrant a return, but because he
has been such a fan favorite. Given that this time the thing
apparently was handled professionally to the satisfaction of both
sides, I'm encouraged by the move and look forward to seeing some fresh
talent.
I feel privileged to have witnessed perhaps Evans' last great moments
in Fenway Park (where he did seem to come up with an inordinate number
of clutch plays) as a Red Sox, where he dismantled the Orioles in
Baltimore's Lost Weekend back in late June, even though I was rooting
for the other side. I saved the Sunday Globe from the day after he hit
the *two* come-from-behind home runs, figuring it would be the highlight
of the season. Maybe it was.
I don't feel that Evans merits Hall-of-Fame induction, though. He just
wasn't a consistently great enough offensive performer in what is
firstly an offensive position, even though he was one of the great
rightfielders of all time. I'll go out on a limb and say that I'd vote
for him in a minute over Jim Rice, though, even though Rice's peaks
were higher.
glenn
|
28.833 | | CAM::WAY | Beaten like a redheaded stepchild... | Thu Oct 25 1990 09:03 | 11 |
| I will never forget my first game at Fenway Park.
I was in the right field seats, behind the foul pair in fair territory.
The first pitch of the game was hit LONG to right field.
Evans ran back, back, back, and made a little leap at the wall, arm
extended up, where the ball just kind of died in his glove.
It was, for me, one of the thrills of a lifetime.....
'Saw
|
28.834 | Good riddence to the last of the contry club Bosox | WORDY::NAZZARO | Eight lbs of stupid in a 5 lb bag | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:06 | 18 |
| Dwight Evans was the last of the crybaby whiners from the under-
achieving Red Sox teams of the 70s and early 80s, the man for
whom the phrase "25 cabs for 25 players" was coined. Evans was
always a backstabbing complainer of average talent who was blessed
to play in Fenway for 18 years. He never won a batting title,
never won an RBI title, his only HR title was a tie in the strike
season, he never hit higher than .305 and only hit over .300 once,
he never had a 200 hit season.
In sum, he was an average offensive player on perennially contending
teams. He was an excellent defensive player in the least difficult
position on the field. He had little speed, and was a below average
baserunner.
The Sox would have had to pay 1.6M for his services in 1991. The
decision to get him go was a no-brainer.
NAZZ
|
28.835 | All of the great outfielders played center and right | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:10 | 6 |
|
Right field the least difficult position on the field? Try left field,
followed by first base.
glenn
|
28.836 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:16 | 3 |
| re .834
So how do you REALLY feel about Evans Nazz ????
|
28.837 | | ICODSP::LEFEBVRE | Wondering where the lions are | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:29 | 6 |
| Nazz, although I agree with you concerning Evans' career, you're way
off base with your assertion that right field is the easiest position
in the field. Left field, first base, and arguably, second base are
all easier.
Mark.
|
28.838 | someone had to pounce on this | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Dyslexic worshipper of Santa | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:34 | 6 |
|
Hey, 'Saw, who was the foul pair you sat behind? Did they have B.O.?
Bad breath? Yankee fans??
Just curious.
|
28.839 | | CAM::WAY | Beaten like a redheaded stepchild... | Thu Oct 25 1990 10:57 | 14 |
| One had hair all over his back, and the other kept yelling about
someone sweating ;^)
re RF:
As someone who has played all three OF positions, I would put forth
the premise that the hardest play in baseball to make is to
cut down the runner going from 1st to 3rd, making the throw from
deep right field.
I would never rank RF as the easiest position to play....
'Saw
|
28.840 | | ICODSP::LEFEBVRE | Wondering where the lions are | Thu Oct 25 1990 11:55 | 4 |
| Slasher was the one wearing the fur coat. I was the one accusing
Chainsaw of sweating.
Mark.
|
28.841 | Sad, but true | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:01 | 6 |
|
Only in Boston would a player of Evans' stature be criticized on the
event of his retirement.
glenn
|
28.842 | | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:12 | 7 |
| > teams. He was an excellent defensive player in the least difficult
> position on the field. He had little speed, and was a below average
I always thought right field was one of the most difficult. They have
to make the longest throws in most parks.
Mike
|
28.843 | Couldn't have been the NAZZ we know...... | SASE::SZABO | | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:15 | 5 |
| Clearly, that was MrT(irade) who broke into NAZZ's account and trashed
Dwight Evans' career. NAZZ is a homeboy if I've ever seen one. I
mean, look at how much he adores Larry! :-)
Hawk
|
28.844 | Right fielders handle the fewest chances of any position | WORDY::NAZZARO | Eight lbs of stupid in a 5 lb bag | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:16 | 15 |
| Just what is Evans' stature? Why this sudden adolation? His only
redeeming quality is that he played 18 years for the same team.
As far as right field beign the easiest position to play, in most
parks left field would be easier, but not in Fenway. And I can't
believe someone actually said second base is easier to play than
right field!! You don't see many right fielders having to turn a
double play!!! Or for that matter, execute pickoffs, position
themselves properly for sutoff throws, cover the bag on steal attempts,
and numerous other functions all the infielders must do every game
while all three outfielders stand around and watch. Please, any
infield position is much more difficult to play than any outfield
position. And I stand by what I said about Evans.
NAZZ
|
28.845 | | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:17 | 5 |
| Sometimes people that have never played organized baseball think right
field is easy because, in pickup games, that's where they put all the
stiffs ;-)
Mike
|
28.846 | Immense smiley goes here | WORDY::NAZZARO | Eight lbs of stupid in a 5 lb bag | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:22 | 3 |
| You know from personal experience, Mike?
NAZZ
|
28.847 | Brooks Robinson has nothing on me! | PNO::HEISER | Ibanez: the axe built to blast! | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:29 | 6 |
| > You know from personal experience, Mike?
That wasn't directed at you Nazz, but since you asked, I play third
base. Never played outfield in my life.
Mike
|
28.849 | Couldn't tell from Gorman's doublespeak | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Voted for whatsisname... | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:43 | 14 |
| >The Red Sox made the right decision for perhaps the wrong reasons.
You didn't elaborate on the wrong reasons, Glenn. I see three sides to
this, and their all very likely.
* Evans production has declined and the Red Sox don't think he'll help
them, especially considering his health.
* He's one of the current "bad apples" that Morgan is looking to purge
in his quest to make the team docile and stupid in his own image.
* $1.6M can be replaced by $100K rookie.
Dan
|
28.850 | Wish they'd apply the same criteria to Joe Morgan | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:46 | 6 |
|
The first was my "right" reason, the second and third the "wrong"
reasons I suspect played a part in the Sox' decision.
glenn
|
28.851 | ok KW? | CNTROL::CHILDS | Lou Duffy's looking for change, spare change | Thu Oct 25 1990 13:07 | 6 |
|
but in the red soxs front office's minds #3 is the correct and most logical
answer. Besides they can waste the 1.6 mil on Bruno cause he managed to hit
a few timely HR's........
mike
|
28.852 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Thu Oct 25 1990 13:32 | 15 |
| The Evans moves was the right one - in his prime, he was a hell of a
player, and Nazz's criticisms aside, I can't see how anyone can dispute
the fact that he was one of the outstanding defensive outfielders of
his time. His own peers said as much.
Yes, he should have been turned loose, I can only guess that he wants
to play in the majors one more season, but the Sox can not afford to
carry a 4th or 5th OF making $1.6M; it's that simple.
As far as backbiting Morgan, I'm in no position to say one way or the
other. Clearly, that can not be tolerated. But I wonder how much Evans
is in the minority ? It is obvious that the man can not handle a
pitching staff, and I believe that the defection of Boddicker and Bruno
(who needs to go elsewhere - the Toronto series aside, he was a bust)
will speak volumes. Or at least a few pages ..... :-)
|
28.853 | Is too cheap | HOTSHT::SCHNEIDER | Voted for whatsisname... | Thu Oct 25 1990 14:11 | 10 |
| >but the Sox can not afford to
>carry a 4th or 5th OF making $1.6M; it's that simple.
Hey Doc, this is a team that is making money hand over fist (MLB cable
contract, local cable, gate, concessions, etc.) and that gouges its
fans every chance it gets. What exactly do you mean "can't afford"?
It's certainly not the same usage as when I say, I can't afford that
new Acura sports car!
Dan
|
28.854 | Talk about selective memory... | SALEM::DODA | Horseshoes, handgrenades, A's Dynasty? | Fri Oct 26 1990 10:32 | 10 |
| Sox have announced that they'd offer Evans an instructional
position once he makes a decision on what he'll do next year.
Amazing that the same people that make Rice out to be a demi-god
come in here and trash Evans.
At least when Dewey got the news he didn't go out like a whining
crybaby....
daryll
|
28.855 | | EARRTH::BROOKS | Straight - no chaser ... | Fri Oct 26 1990 12:58 | 6 |
| Sorry darryl, but I don't remember anyone making Rice out to be a
demi-god, usually it was the opposite.
As far as 'whining' goes, I can't blam (tm) Rice for being bitter. This
town treated him like s**t .... 'Dewey' was the demi-god around here
...
|
28.856 | Journalistic integrity? What's that??? | WORDY::NAZZARO | Eight lbs of stupid in a 5 lb bag | Fri Oct 26 1990 14:26 | 36 |
| Did anyone else barf on Peter Gammons' article in the Globe this
morning? His pathetic salnt on the truth disgusts me. For 15
years all we've heard from him and his ilk is that the Sox ran
a country club, that the inmates ran the asylum, the "25 cabs for
25 players", and Evans was always fingered as one of the ringleaders
of that bunch. Gammons acknowledges as much in one paragraph of
the article. the rest of the piece is spent feeling sorry for
Dewey, and trashing management for letting him go, and bemoaning
the fact that players no longer want to play in Boston.
What a load of crap!!! Who is supposed to be running t he team,
Morgan and Gorman or the players? Argue with Gorman's moves or
lack of moves, question Morgan's strategy and his use of the bullpen,
but please Gammons, don't pull a 180 on us and try to make us feel
sorry for poor Dewey and the rest of those primadonnas. The bullpen
trying to show up Morgan at the end of the year was the ultimate lack
of class. Dewey trying to enlist Yaz as his personal hitting
instructor was another sharp move.
The ultimate responsibilty for running this team does not rest with
Dwight Evans, Marty Barrett, Rob Murphy, or any of the other overpaid
adolescents. The Red Sox are a business, and a profitable one. The
fallout of that fact is the basis for another discussion, but on a
business level, releasing a 39 year old DH who can't bend over and
was a disruption in the clubhouse was a no-brainer. Especially when
you want to give some PT to Mo Vaughn and/or Phil Plantier. Do you
think the Sox would have any chance of signing Brunansky if Dewey
was still here?
Gammons just makes me so mad. He twists any situation to fit his
particular whim of the day. You can't have it both ways Peter. Either
Dewey is a clubhouse lawyer who is in the twilight of a good career, or
he's a man wronged by a callous front office. You can't tell us both
stories and expect us to believe each of them.
NAZZ
|
28.857 | | MPO::GILBERT | No on 3 Yes on 5 Keep Mass. Alive | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:08 | 8 |
|
I have to agree with Nazz regarding right field in Fenway Park.
Left field is like playing ping pong on two sides. Center isn't
alot better. All Dewey ever had to worry about was a certain corner
in foul territory and staying out of the stands. His strong arm
gave him the advantage in the 1st to 3rd situation but there are
others who could have done as well.
|
28.858 | What if ??? | SHALOT::HUNT | No. 1 Ranked Virginia Cavaliers | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:12 | 14 |
| � ... the basis for another discussion, but on a business level,
� releasing a 39 year old DH who can't bend over and was a disruption in
� the clubhouse was a no-brainer.
Which brings up a whole 'nother rathole. Would Dewey have even been
around *this* long if there were no Designated Hitter ??? Would he
have had a more honorable farewell from Beantown and baseball just a
few years ago when his *total* game slipped if he wasn't able to stick
around too long and be a DH through this year ???
It hurts to cut the long-time vets and the DH just prolongs the agony
past the point of usefulness.
Bob Hunt
|
28.859 | Fire Morgan. Keep Dewie! | DOCTP::TESSIER | Dial a cliche | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:16 | 9 |
| How ironic that on the day the Sox announce that they don't have
room for Evans on next year's team, the Elias Sports Bureau, whose
rankings of players is used by major league baseball to determine
a player's free agency rating (A,B,C), releases this year's
rankings by position and has Dwight Evans tied with Dave Parker
as the best DH in the league, and 42-year-old Carlton Fisk as the
best catcher in either league.
Laker_Ken
|
28.860 | My 2 Cents | USCTR2::RBLOUNT | You Need A Mr MacAfee Speech! | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:19 | 20 |
|
Re: .856
Yeah, I read that too Nazz and wondered what the hell was going on. I
expected to read how the Sox were continuing with their purge of "bad
apples". Instead, it was a very pro Evans, anti-Morgan, anti-management
article. Even so, I think Gammons makes some good points in the
article. Like who do the Sox have to replace Dewie's bat? HR
production, already low, will drop even further. An additional point
was the Sox' lack of class in dealing with other loyal players in the
past. Also, he points out managements lack of leadership in dealing
with the players(exhibit A: Clemens). There must be something to the
gist of what Gammons wrote because the Sox free agents have been real
quick to leave when the opportunity arises.
I think the problem of "clubhouse chemistry" continues.
JMHO
Reb
|
28.861 | 1990 was the first year Evans couldn't cut it | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:22 | 17 |
|
> Which brings up a whole 'nother rathole. Would Dewey have even been
> around *this* long if there were no Designated Hitter ???
Evans was playing a decent right field as late as 1989. No DH would
have cost him a few games, to be sure, but the current move would have
come only at most one year before it did.
Nazz, I read the Gammons article and came away not feeling that it
vindicated Evans at Sox' management expense, but rather that the story
really had very little to do with Evans at all. It was a basic slam on
management, most of which I happen to agree with. In any case, we will
soon see how accurate Gammons is with his assessment of what players
think of the Boston Red Sox when the free agent season ends.
glenn
|
28.862 | Sox' pitching staff just took a BIG hit | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Wed Nov 21 1990 11:52 | 6 |
| Just read in both the Red Sox and Baseball notes conferences that the
Kansas City Royals have signed Mike Boddicker....I don't know what the
contract details are.
py
|
28.863 | | CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Nov 21 1990 12:05 | 7 |
| > Just read in both the Red Sox and Baseball notes conferences that the
> Kansas City Royals have signed Mike Boddicker....I don't know what the
> contract details are.
Three years, 9 million dollars ...
|
28.864 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Take thee thy turkey and stuff it | Wed Nov 21 1990 13:17 | 29 |
|
(sigh) Doesn't anyone want to play in Boston anymore? Bye-bye
Bodlicker.
But the good news is, I saw a blurb in the Woostah papah today that
45-year old Jim Palmer is actually considering a comeback. He was
quoted as saying his arm felt better right now than it was when he left
the game, and that he's been throwing three times a week. Now there's
a guy the Red Sox could go after. ;^0
Funny thing is, with some of the signings we've seen lately, he could
be offered more money than he ever made before in his career.
Does he get de-enshrined at the Hall of Fame if he plays again, and
will he have to go through the waiting period for election all over
again?
Will this mean I can audition as the new spokesman for Haynes
underwear? Which reminds me of something I heard on the radio
yesterday:
"Do you have holes in your underwear?"
"Why, no."
"Then how do you get your legs in em?" HAHAHAHAHAH
Dickster, waiting for the holiday weekend to begin.
|
28.865 | | CAM::WAY | Wiggle it, just a little bit | Mon Nov 26 1990 07:09 | 9 |
| I've said it before, I'll say it again:
Until the Red Sox get a *good* GM, and until the organization
is willing to pay competitive money to the players, this
team will never win the Big Enchilada. They may flirt with
the top in spite of themselves (cf. 1988, 1990), but they'll
never make it...
'saw
|
28.866 | Championships are not the goal, $$$$$ is. | BUILD::MORGAN | | Mon Nov 26 1990 10:56 | 11 |
| The problem with the Red Sox isn't paying the big bucks. They have one
of the highest payrolls in MLB. It's who they pay the big bucks to.
They give Barrett, Gedman, et al the millions they don't deserve.
That's where they're stupid.
The problem is with the team's management. Jean Yawkey and Haywood
Sullivan haven't spoken to each other in years (nice way to run a
business, huh?). Yawkey pulls rank on Sullivan, and they pack 2.5
million fans in a year. She ain't gonna change nothing.
Steve
|
28.867 | Hope she chokes on a turkey bone | COGITO::HILL | | Mon Nov 26 1990 11:52 | 3 |
| Lets just hope the ol' hag kicks the bucket soon. 'Course us Sox fans
have been wainting for that to happen for years, but only then will
anything change
|
28.868 | | CAM::WAY | Wiggle it, just a little bit | Mon Nov 26 1990 14:20 | 17 |
| Well, a similar situation existed with the New York Giants a few
years back. The Maras had a falling out, and the team had
wallowed in really poor straits.
Rozelle stepped in, and the upshot was that George Young was made
GM and within a few years he (and Parcells and the coaching staff)
has turned the club around, with a Super Bowl win under their belts,
and a perennial contender.
Steve, you make a good point about the money going to the wrong people.
I'm just frustrated because I really don't see any plan to build this
team into a champion. They let the good guys slip away, and what
they have really sucks....
Oh well, no one ever said being a Red Sux fan was easy 8^)
'Saw
|
28.869 | Anyone else hear this? | SALEM::DODA | Milli Vanilli=2 fat bald guys? Could be... | Tue Nov 27 1990 14:28 | 7 |
| Was in Maryland for Thanksgiving and my brother-in-law told
me that the Balt. papers have been talking up a Dave Johnson/Bob
Milacki for Mike Greenwell trade.
First I'd heard of it....
daryll
|
28.870 | hi neighbor | STAR::YANKOWSKAS | Paul Yankowskas | Tue Nov 27 1990 14:47 | 16 |
| re daryll:
I've heard Greenwell to Baltimore rumors off and on since the season
ended, but nothing concrete. One source (forget who) supposedly quoted
Gorman as saying that he wouldn't give up Greenwell for anything short of
Ben MacDonald (yeah right, get a clue Lou).
I think the trade you mention makes sense both ways. The Sox
definitely need starting pitching with Boddicker gone, and the O's need
an RBI man (and have enough pitching in the upper minors to sustain the
loss of Johnson and Milacki).
(btw, moving day is Dec. 8th)
py
|
28.871 | It's getting out of hand | CELTIK::JACOB | We all become forefathers, by and by | Thu Dec 06 1990 10:50 | 12 |
| I'm not trying to bash the Sox or anything, but this intrigued me.
I heard on the radio the other day that the Red Sox signed some free
agent pitcher for something like $7mil over three years. Now the
kicker is that the guy was something like 8-18 last year and missed the
two previous seasons with elbow problems. Just what is this guy
supposed to have that makes him worth over 2 mil a year?????
Beats me!!!!
JaKe
|
28.872 | | AXIS::ROBICHAUD | Docker...Pant for |CENSORED| | Thu Dec 06 1990 11:10 | 16 |
| ================================================================================
Note 28.871 The Boston Red Sox Note 871 of 871
CELTIK::JACOB "We all become forefathers, by and by" 12 lines 6-DEC-1990 10:50
-< It's getting out of hand >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
� Just what is this guy supposed to have that makes him worth over 2 mil a
� year?????
� Beats me!!!!
� JaKe
A left arm that has a little bit of life left in it. Lou finally
found that lefhander to replace Bruce Hurst.
/Don
|
28.873 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iraqis roasting when we open fire | Thu Dec 06 1990 11:53 | 17 |
|
And when is Wes Gardner (the stiff) eligible for free agency? Why
should he stay with Boston and get pounded when he can go somewhere
else and get pounded for kazillions of dollars?
(AP)Boston
The Red Sox today signed free agent pitcher Morton Dingleberry, a free
agent 42 year old left hander. "Dingles" made one career appearance
with the Washington Senators, throwing four pitches, one of them for a
strike. Said Lou Gorman, "We feel that this is the one guy we need to
bolster this staff. His one strike and four ball record is somewhat
deceiving, because I was told that at least two of those balls were
really really close to the plate. By today's market standards, we feel
that the four-year $10 million price was worth it."
Dickster
|
28.874 | Dingles, a lock for the Cy Young! | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Thu Dec 06 1990 11:59 | 6 |
|
Dickster, I'm rooooling! HA HA!!! Dingles is GOD!
Steve
|
28.875 | | MPP6::MACNEAL | Life's 2 short 2 drink cheap beer | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:10 | 1 |
| Lookit the money guys like Bud Black and Zane Smith are getting.
|
28.876 | | MPP6::CHILDS | U can be happy, if U have mind too | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:18 | 10 |
|
They also offered Welch 11 million for 3 years. I guess they figure they're
going to loose Roger to be throwing this kind of money around instead of
offering it to him...
I loved the reasoning in the paper yesterday on the Young deal. Well all
of our hitters fear him, he throws hard, he did have 3 shutouts last year,
he'll be better on a contending club etc...hahahahaaaaa
mike
|
28.877 | EX | SASE::SZABO | The Beer Hunter | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:25 | 2 |
| DONGLES IS NO TOO BLAM! SY YUNG HAD WON STRIEK TWO! %^}
|
28.878 | | MPP6::MACNEAL | Life's 2 short 2 drink cheap beer | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:30 | 12 |
| � They also offered Welch 11 million for 3 years. I guess they figure they're
� going to loose Roger to be throwing this kind of money around instead of
� offering it to him...
Or it may be a way of making sure Roger sticks around. Clemens has
stated that he wants to pitch for a winner. The Sox lost Hurst and now
Boddicker. Everyone knows the Sox won't be very competitive with
Clemens, Young, and the rest. Aquiring Welch would show Clemens and
the fans that the Sox are finally committed to winning. Ya, ya, I
know, but it might not be as far fetched as it sounds. Someone in
another conference suggested that this might be the Gene Autry syndrome
- management wants to win one before heading for the final roundup.
|
28.879 | MAc did you really say that? | MPP6::CHILDS | U can be happy, if U have mind too | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:37 | 13 |
| > Everyone knows the Sox won't be very competitive with
> Clemens, Young, and the rest.
^^^^^^^
Wow bad mouthing the King by the faithful? Must be the writers getting to
you guys...hahaha just kidding
but your point is well taken and makes sense but I have the feeling that
Roger wants to go home to Texas more than play on a winner. I also think
that he'd really go to Timbuktoo if they offered 2 million more a year
than anyone else...
mike
|
28.880 | | MCIS1::DHAMEL | Iraqis roasting when we open fire | Thu Dec 06 1990 12:47 | 15 |
|
And I'm sure the Red Sox organization can afford it, too. Frankly, I
feel that Welch will sign for more than that and for a longer term, but
I'm sure his being in the rotation with Clemens must be some kind of
incentive too.
The next step is to then make Roger the highest paid pitcher in
baseball. Money doesn't always buy championships, but it's nice to see
management get with the times and play the money game with the big
boys. Cripes, get us a world championship and the Sox will make more
money than they ever made before, just on "Red Sox World Champions"
paraphenalia and memorablelabia.
Dickster
|
28.881 | | CAM::WAY | Your house'll smell like Hurl Whiff | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:02 | 27 |
| � money than they ever made before, just on "Red Sox World Champions"
� paraphenalia and memorablelabia.
Yeah, cause if we ever did win it, who knows how long it'd be before
we won it again!
But, you know, I'm getting pissed off.
I see people like this Young fellow making all that money. Now,
I'm a software engineer, see. And the way I see it, I'm not the
Roger Clemens or Bruce Hurst of Software Engineers, but I am a
pretty solid software engineer, I mean, I'm a better engineer that
a Young engineer for sure.
So, if these pitchers can go out and make megabucks when they
stink, I think that DEC should start paying us engineers and other
types what we're worth too. I mean, I'd settle for $2 million over
3 years. Hell, by today's prices that's cheap. Imagine what
a Roger Clemens software engineer would cost them...
And I'm not a haid case either!
Guess I'm working REAL cheap...8^)
'Saw
|
28.882 | why it would take 3 engineers to do my job... | MPP6::CHILDS | U can be happy, if U have mind too | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:08 | 11 |
|
Saw if they paid you engineers what you're really worth we wouldn't need
a layoff. Um excuse me transitional packages.
you want to talk underpaid but over worked you're talking Technicians...
Techs = God....
many many smilies
mike
|
28.883 | | CAM::WAY | Your house'll smell like Hurl Whiff | Thu Dec 06 1990 13:15 | 19 |
| � Saw if they paid you engineers what you're really worth we wouldn't need
� a layoff. Um excuse me transitional packages.
�
� you want to talk underpaid but over worked you're talking Technicians...
�
� Techs = God....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, good one Mikey.
But, hey, we're all grunts. And everyone knows that the grunts know
how it should be done. BUT, do the "officers" ever listen to the
grunts? As John Belushi would say "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO".
OH well....
8^)
'Saw_an_overworked_unlistened_to_engineer...
|
28.884 | | UPWARD::HEISER | send an enemy a smoke alarm for Xmas! | Thu Dec 06 1990 14:09 | 6 |
| RE: Mike & 'Saw
If you follow DIGITAL at all, you'll know that many are telling the
"officers" how it should be done. Let's hope they're listening!
Mike
|
28.885 | Right on brother..8^) | KEPNUT::DIGGINS | | Thu Dec 06 1990 14:49 | 7 |
|
Mike, I couldn't agree with you more. Right on dude.
Tech power.
Steve
|
28.886 | Help | CELTIK::JACOB | We all become forefathers, by and by | Thu Dec 06 1990 15:19 | 7 |
| Somewhere back a few someone mentioned Zane Smith. Did he sign with
somebody and if so, who and for how much????
Thanks
JaKe
|
28.887 | | MPP6::MACNEAL | Life's 2 short 2 drink cheap beer | Thu Dec 06 1990 15:21 | 4 |
| Oops, I can see how I could be misconstrued, Mike.
What I meant is that with the supporting cast Clemens has now, even he
won't be enough to carry the Sox to a champsheenship.
|
28.888 | | MPP6::MACNEAL | Life's 2 short 2 drink cheap beer | Thu Dec 06 1990 15:24 | 2 |
| Jake, I don't think Zane has been signed by anyone yet, but he's being
wooed by a few teams.
|
28.889 | | DASXPS::TIMMONS | I'm a Pepere! | Fri Dec 07 1990 05:29 | 9 |
| Dewey Evans signed with the Orioles for 1 year at $1M. Not bad for
someone his age, huh?
Lee
P.S. Hawk-Since I'm still a "kid" at 50, you can guess what that makes
you! :*)
Lee
|
28.890 | Stayed with the Pirates. | PSBUIN::MURRAY | SRV | Fri Dec 07 1990 08:02 | 6 |
|
Zane Smith stayed in Pittsburg and signed a 4 year deal. Anyone
have any figures on the buckage ($$$) he got..
Thanks,
Dave.
|
28.891 | Zane Smith | CELTIK::JACOB | We all become forefathers, by and by | Fri Dec 07 1990 08:54 | 4 |
| Zane Smith got 10.5 Million for 4 years from the Bucs.
JaKe
|
28.892 | baseball is on the brink of a BIG decline | SACT41::ROSS | Blow me a kiss | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:53 | 9 |
| For what the Sox paid for Danny Darwin, Matt Young, and Jack Clark,
couldn't they have gotten Gary Gaetti and Vince Coleman? Maybe Gaetti
is determined to stay in Minnesota, but the Sox certainly could have
made a tempting offer.
Paying big buck, longterm contracts to guys like Darwin, Clark, and
Young is asinine. I hope they finish last.
|
28.893 | | ASABET::J_REID | Bart Simpson for Governor | Thu Dec 20 1990 13:59 | 3 |
|
I didn't know Gaetti and Coleman could pitch...8')
|