T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
7921.1 | | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Tue Feb 11 1997 17:59 | 9 |
| > THE FIRST 3 LINES of all ads WILL include the AUTHORS Name, VMSNode (not
> UNIX node, .....
I think Skip really didn't mean "VMSNode", but meant DECnet
mail address (ie. of the form node::username). Skip may be
surprised to know that this note is being written by a NOTES
client running on a UNIX node, and that the author field of
this node (VAXCPU::michaud) is a valid DECnet mail address,
even though the node is UNIX.
|
7921.2 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Tue Feb 11 1997 18:16 | 6 |
| Well, it's still a problem as many groups are moving away from the
DECnet node mail address nomenclature to Exchange (witness some
of the more recent postings). Skip's group apparently hasn't
yet. I guess I don't understand the big deal about having a DEcnet
style address to contribute to ::CLASSIFIED.
K
|
17.3 | | ASABET::pelkey.ogo.dec.com::pelkey | Professional Hombre | Wed Feb 12 1997 09:06 | 7 |
| Well, usenet news groups classifieds are pretty easy to participate
in, and alot less rules. I have to admit it's a little frustrating
to try and post something here and have it disappear because
you forgot to enter a piece of info...
Hey, I don't mind rules, but this conference seems to have a few
too many.
|
17.4 | WHAT DO WE DO? | STOWOA::FRANCOEUR | | Wed Feb 12 1997 09:17 | 7 |
| What about those of us who reside @OGO. Stowoa is going away on
Friday, February 14th (happy valentines day), what do we use as an
address, if not our Exchange address, when posting an article for sale?
Thanks,
Pat
|
17.5 | not rocket science to post a note | CADSYS::SHEPARD | Overwhelmed by trivialities | Wed Feb 12 1997 09:25 | 18 |
|
I'll tell you what's frustrating. Trying to buy something from a
Usenet newsgroup and
a) They don't list where they are located
b) They don't list a name and nobody at the phone number knows
what you're talking about.
c) They don't leave a valid email address and the message header
holds an invalid address.
All of these things have happened to me. In my experience, having
all the required information is very helpful and makes the whole
process much smoother. If you read the directions before posting a
note, it's not hard. I think the jury is still out on how to solve
the address now that people are moving to inferior mail systems. ;-)
But I'm very happy that the other rules are enforced.
Cheers,
--Dave
|
17.6 | | FABSIX::J_SADIN | Freedom isn't free. | Wed Feb 12 1997 10:19 | 7 |
|
The rules in here were created over the years due to complaints
from the users. As Dave says, posting a note is not rocket science. I'm
sure we can work something out about the email addresses.
jim (mod)
|
17.7 | it's easy, you stop using this forum | NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Wed Feb 12 1997 12:11 | 9 |
| > What about those of us who reside @OGO. Stowoa is going away on
> Friday, February 14th (happy valentines day), what do we use as an
> address, if not our Exchange address, when posting an article for sale?
you start using the Internet classified ad forums. There are hundreds to
choose from.
|
17.8 | not everyone's scheduled to move to PC applications | NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Wed Feb 12 1997 12:14 | 8 |
| > Well, it's still a problem as many groups are moving away from the
> DECnet node mail address nomenclature to Exchange (witness some
> of the more recent postings). Skip's group apparently hasn't
> yet. I guess I don't understand the big deal about having a DEcnet
and, guess what, we're not moving. Nobody's come up with a way to manage
the huge databases we use so we're the last bastion of VMS users and will
be for the foreseeable future.
|
17.9 | | NOTIME::SACKS | Gerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085 | Wed Feb 12 1997 14:34 | 4 |
| From what I gather from reading 2.21-2.23, the problem with using non-DECnet
addresses is that they're sometimes wrong or unreachable. It's quite possible
to list an erroneous or unreachable DECnet address. Why not just make the
rule "if the address is unreachable, the note will be deleted?"
|
17.10 | quite simple, really | NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Wed Feb 12 1997 16:25 | 7 |
| >to list an erroneous or unreachable DECnet address. Why not just make the
>rule "if the address is unreachable, the note will be deleted?"
Because I'm sick and tired of gettingh mail "Why was my note deleted?"
|
17.11 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Wed Feb 12 1997 17:27 | 8 |
| Why would the moderator care of the person with the item for sale
was reachable or not? If I enter a note with a bogus return address
then I won't sell what I want to sell! Its just like putting a
classified ad in the local paper without giving a telephone number.
You just wasted your money. The moderators don't need to be big
brother.
-John
|
17.12 | | WMOIS::GIROUARD_C | | Thu Feb 13 1997 06:00 | 4 |
| -1 Out of courtesy for the person who may be looking
for such an item?
Chip
|
17.13 | Double Standard ???? | BCVAXD::SCERRA | | Thu Feb 13 1997 07:25 | 9 |
| Then there is always the option of well I could not reach them by
mail so I will pick up the phone and call.
Phone numbers are required....
Don
|
17.14 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Thu Feb 13 1997 09:35 | 7 |
| RE: .12
Well, the "courtesy" of not letting me purchase items from people
who don't have DECnet mail addresses is not welcome by me.
-John
|
17.15 | | DANGER::ARRIGHI | and miles to go before I sleep | Thu Feb 13 1997 11:38 | 5 |
| If no one cares to fix this, it will be a self-correcting problem, once
there are too few people accessing this conference to make it viable.
Tony
|
17.16 | | 12680::MCCUSKER | | Thu Feb 13 1997 13:25 | 18 |
| > If no one cares to fix this, it will be a self-correcting problem, once
> there are too few people accessing this conference to make it viable.
What a shame.
The way I see it two things need to happen:
1. People shouldn't hassel the mods if they can't reach someone who advertised.
I am amazed to think that people do hassel the mods over this. If you
can't reach the person, what the heck is the moderator to do?
2. The mods need to lighten up and allow internet addresses. The reason i
hear that they won't is because people complain that they can't reach
the advertisers. Well if 1 would happen, seems like 2 goes away.
At the least we should be given a reasonable explanation as to why the rule
won't be changed. And hopefully the reason is more than because we said so.
|
17.17 | Exchange Mail | USCTR1::BRITTEN | | Thu Feb 13 1997 14:41 | 3 |
| Are you telling me that people on Exchange mail can't place ads in here
anymore?? By the end of the year all of Digital will be on Exchange
(so I was told!).
|
17.18 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Thu Feb 13 1997 14:51 | 11 |
| Correct. The current rules by the moderators is that you MUST have
a VMSmail address listed in the 1st three lines (along with your
name and phone number). If you don't have those 3, you notes
gets trahsed.
As for "everybody" being on Exchange before the end of the year,
don't believe everything you are told...
-John
|
17.19 | | PCBUOA::KRATZ | | Thu Feb 13 1997 15:37 | 5 |
| re .17, .18
Yes, it appears to be nothing more than an ego problem with Skip,
but he makes the rules, so the next step is to go to Human Resources
and try and get them to work the issue with him.
Kratz
|
17.20 | don't like it here? set up your own! | MAZE::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Thu Feb 13 1997 15:45 | 11 |
| re: .19
Don't be absurd. If you don't (or anyone else doesn't) like the way this
conference is being run, offer to run it yourself (or set up your own).
He's entitled to virtually any rules he wants, to make his life easier, or
for any other reason.
Your approach is the quickest way possible to get this conference shut
down.
Ray
|
17.21 | | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Thu Feb 13 1997 15:57 | 32 |
| > Correct. The current rules by the moderators is that you MUST have
> a VMSmail address listed .....
of course:
USRMC1::"[email protected]"
is a valid VMSmail address that VMSmail users can use (non-VMS
users are usually smart enough to strip the USRMC:: and the
double quotes and use that).
I think the problem Skip is trying to solve are ads that
only list their email address as:
[email protected]
and there are enough VMSmail users out there that don't know
how to convert that to something VMSmail will accept (ie.
either the above, or if the users node has UCX, they
can also use smtp%"[email protected]" to send it
on a more direct route), and hence the problem Skip is seeing.
What I would really wish in some new rules is to require ads
to contain the city and state where the item(s) is/are
located or can be seen/picked up, and an asking price. This
can save both the poster of the ad, and those that respond,
measurable time (and usually on Digital's clock).
Most people who don't put an asking price do so so they can
get more responses, but in reality once the responders find
out the price offline, you're going to end up with the same
number of interested parties willing to pay that price.
|
17.22 | | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Thu Feb 13 1997 16:00 | 6 |
| > He's entitled to virtually any rules he wants, to make his life easier, or
> for any other reason.
Well not quite virtually. See the PP&P for more info (the
relevant sections may even be posted in the rules topic
of this conference).
|
17.23 | username, not user address | NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Thu Feb 13 1997 17:18 | 16 |
| > of course:
>
> USRMC1::"[email protected]"
>
> is a valid VMSmail address that VMSmail users can use (non-VMS
> users are usually smart enough to strip the USRMC:: and the
> double quotes and use that).
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Node::username *NOT* router::address
as for what happens when everyone's on Exchange? This conference gets shut
down.
|
17.24 | | 2155::michaud | Jeff Michaud - ObjectBroker | Thu Feb 13 1997 17:43 | 17 |
| >> of course:
>> USRMC1::"[email protected]"
>> is a valid VMSmail address that VMSmail users can use (non-VMS
>> users are usually smart enough to strip the USRMC:: and the
>> double quotes and use that).
> WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You really have gone off the deep end with this rule then...
Ie. what's wrong with the above?
Does that also mean I can't use VAXCPU::michaud because your
rule states it must refer to a VMS node?
Why not just give moderation of this conference up for adoption
if you no longer enjoy moderating it?
And to think I was defending what I thought the rule said, gee wiz
|
17.25 | | 12680::MCCUSKER | | Thu Feb 13 1997 18:13 | 9 |
| >as for what happens when everyone's on Exchange? This conference gets shut
>down.
Skip, the unfortunate thing is, its not going to get to the point where
everyone is on Exchange. So what is going to happen is a real decent
conference is going to be extremely underutilized, which will then kill it.
And as far as I can see there is no good reason for it.
Please, tell us why?
|