T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
155.1 | guess security folks didn't learn from the Seles incident | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Fri Jan 07 1994 02:09 | 7 |
| Nancy Kerrigan was attacked after a practice session at the US Figure
Skating Championships. She may or may not skate tomorrow afternoon.
Apparently she can appeal to the USOC for a spot on the olympic team
even if she does not compete this weekend.
The Crazy Met
|
155.2 | | SALEM::TIMMONS | A waist is a terrible thing to mind | Fri Jan 07 1994 07:17 | 19 |
| "Good" and bad news regarding this-
"Good" is that she apparently didn't sustain any career-threating
injury.
Bad is thinking of all the time and effort she's put into preparing for
this, the most important skating event in her young life.
I remember when my daughter was hurt early in her senior year, and it
wiped out the remaining season for her. This was the year she wanted
to shine for the scouts and college coaches. While here injury was
freaky, it did happen in the heat of a game. Kerrigan, on the other
hand, was viciously attacked and the only possible connection I can
think of at this time is that it was an attempt to keep her from making
the team so that some other skater would make it. Kinda like the Seles
attack. What a damn shame.
Lee
|
155.3 | what now... | SALEM::STIG | | Fri Jan 07 1994 09:01 | 4 |
| and the guy wasn't even caught. Apparently he ran thru the security
guards and spectators and no one stopped him. What a real shame...
stig
|
155.4 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | NoTeam-NoBud | Fri Jan 07 1994 09:48 | 5 |
| The last two attacks on athletes at a sporting event have happened
at a tennis match and a figure skating practice, both sports that
supposedly have sophisticated fans.
/Don
|
155.5 | | MKFSA::LONG | I know a survivor! | Fri Jan 07 1994 09:52 | 5 |
| /Don, my guess is it's because they don't have Foxboro-Stadium-
Neandrathals working those events. Well, at least not yet.
billl
|
155.6 | | GWEN::ASHE | Detriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. Champs | Fri Jan 07 1994 10:06 | 5 |
| Detriot: it's no place for... never mind...
Seles was attacked by a Graf fan.
Think this guy was into Katerina Witt?
|
155.7 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 07 1994 10:17 | 14 |
| The Seles thing reflected the passion with which many Europeans follow their
sporting heros. I suspect the Kerrigan thing will be the same.
The interesting thang here is the way the scenario will play out:
If she doesn't compete, she can appeal to the US Olympic Comittee
for a spot on the team, based upon the fact that she is deserving,
and that she was injured during the chapeenships. If on the other
hand, she toughs it out and goes out and competes while injured,
she is totally on he rown to make the team.
What would you do?
=Bob=
|
155.8 | | GWEN::ASHE | Detriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. Champs | Fri Jan 07 1994 10:35 | 4 |
| I thought there was a rule for her to appeal she had to have earned a
medal in the last championships (which she didn't do) or some other
criteria she didn't meet. That was last I heard.
|
155.9 | fyi | FRETZ::HEISER | no, I'm very, very shy | Fri Jan 07 1994 11:12 | 1 |
| She is going to try and skate today.
|
155.10 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 07 1994 11:22 | 12 |
| Yabbut,
The swelling has spread to the back of her knee which is not good
according to some doc I heard on the radio. The docs might not let
her perform. I hope the USOC puts her on the team in any event.
What a tragedy. They oughtta let Nancy skate on this guy's face
fer punishment if they catch up with it
MikeL
BTW, the first thang she should due is git her lawyer to take
a nice look at security in Cobo. Ridiculous.
|
155.11 | ver boten | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Fri Jan 07 1994 12:07 | 8 |
| > <<< Note 155.6 by GWEN::ASHE "Detriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. Champs" >>>
>
> Think this guy was into Katerina Witt?
Won't touch this one.
Kevin
|
155.12 | related to the "Strangler"??? | SALEM::STIG | | Fri Jan 07 1994 12:50 | 3 |
| We have a crazy running around..."The Boston Basher"...
stig
|
155.13 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jan 07 1994 12:51 | 12 |
|
>>The Seles thing reflected the passion with which many Europeans
>>follow their sporting heros. I suspect the Kerrigan thing will be
>>the same.
Sheeeeeit, I sure hope Sammy Leilei doesn't get trampled by
a water buffalo!
|
155.14 | a real shame | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Fri Jan 07 1994 13:05 | 5 |
| WCVB just reported that Kerrigna will not compete in the US
Championships.
The Crazy Met
|
155.15 | Medical Decision | WREATH::SCOPA | | Fri Jan 07 1994 15:15 | 19 |
| Nancy Kerrigan's doctors have said that she cannot bend her knee and
that they have drained her knee of fluid. They are fearful that any
activity will cause furthere damage. She will undergo an MRI to
determine if any cartilage damage resulted from the attack.
This is a medical decision which puts the Olympic Selection Committee
on the spot. On the one hand they could put her on the team but the
injury may affect her skating talent to the point that she may not
be a world class figure skater any more.
I think it was the best decision that could be made amidst the
circumstances.
Let's hope she fully recovers...otherwise we'll see some nasty
repercussions.
M
|
155.16 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | Fri Jan 07 1994 15:34 | 8 |
|
>>What a tragedy. They oughtta let Nancy skate on this guy's face
>>fer punishment if they catch up with it
OR, let her do the Mrs. Bobbitt thang to him with a skate while she's
wearing it.
JaKe
|
155.17 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Fri Jan 07 1994 15:48 | 7 |
| I seem to recall that for the 1992 Winter Olympics once of the figure
skating spots was given to someone who could not compete in the US
Championships because of injury. I believe it was one of the 3 spots
for the Men's single.
The Crazy Met
|
155.18 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Fri Jan 07 1994 15:52 | 6 |
| That was the kid from the Cape. Can't remember his name. Because the
US did so poorly in last year's world championships, only 2 skaters for
the men and women will be allowed in this year's Olympics, if it hasn't
been stated already.
Steve
|
155.19 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Fri Jan 07 1994 15:54 | 8 |
|
This will be a tough call for the US Olympic committee. I believe
the rule is, if you won a medal the the previous World Championship.
You can be granted a spot if you can not compete in the Qualifying do
to injury. Does anybody know what Nancy did in the Worlds? I seem to
remember 4th. In the '92 Olympics she won a bronze medal.
Ron
|
155.20 | | DECWET::METZGER | Sleep deprivation is a good thing... | Fri Jan 07 1994 16:34 | 5 |
|
5th place in the worlds...tough break...It sounds like he whanged her with a
tire iron or a pipe from our news reports...
Metz
|
155.21 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!! | Sat Jan 08 1994 19:21 | 8 |
| The US Skating Federation has a rule in its by-laws that it can
consider for selection skaters who did not compete in the national
chamiponships.
Todd Eldredge got the 3rd spot for the 1992 Olympics.
The Crazy Met
|
155.22 | Righr on... | SALEM::STIG | | Mon Jan 10 1994 08:58 | 3 |
| Nancy has been chosen to skate for this years US Olympic team.
stig
|
155.23 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | Dan Reeves mental midget | Mon Jan 10 1994 09:04 | 6 |
|
>> Nancy has been chosen to skate for this years US Olympic team.
for all the right rea$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$on$$$$$$$$$$$
mikey
|
155.24 | | USCTR1::KING | | Mon Jan 10 1994 11:42 | 6 |
| I guess I'm one of the few that thinks she (Nancy) should not have been
placed on the team. She should have earned her way on like everyone
else. The skating committee should have eated to see if NK recovered
and judged her...
REK
|
155.25 | hahahaha.... | SALEM::STIG | | Mon Jan 10 1994 12:17 | 3 |
| eated??? C'mon Rick...what is it lunch time???
stig
|
155.26 | She isn't in yet.... | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Mon Jan 10 1994 13:00 | 8 |
|
As a Bronze medalist in the '92 games and the defending National
champion. Her credentials are good enough to get her on the team. She
will be evaluated by a 5 member Olympic committee panel on Feb. 3rd. If
she is not ready by Feb 3rd, the alternate will go. So she is not an
autmatic entry as of yet
Ron
|
155.27 | | USCTR1::KING | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:31 | 9 |
| You heard (read) it here first....
Today, at 4:00 pm Detriot Police will announce that Tanya Harding's
Husband and her bodyguard will be charged with the attack on Nancy
Kerrigan....
REK
|
155.28 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Whitewater/Whitewash | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:42 | 5 |
| I predict that the ratings for this year's Olympic Women's Figure
Skating will soar through the roof! Man this stuff is better than the
Bobbit trial!
/Don
|
155.29 | Soccer and figure skating, my secret passions... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:44 | 18 |
|
> Today, at 4:00 pm Detriot Police will announce that Tanya Harding's
> Husband and her bodyguard will be charged with the attack on Nancy
> Kerrigan....
You know, when I first heard about this incident, damned if the
thought didn't briefly cross my mind that the attack could have been
calculated by someone close to a competitor and damned if that
person wasn't Harding's boyfriend/husband. Not that I thought
that it was a likelihood or even a possibility, but the guy was
well-known for prior violent criminal activity. I don't follow
this skating stuff much but it was well-publicized around the time
of the last Olympics that this psycho was beating the crap out of
Harding and had restraining orders and whatnot out against him.
Apparently there must have been a "reconciliation"...
glenn
|
155.30 | I know it was one of them... | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:46 | 7 |
| That funny when I first saw this at my In-Laws I said I'll bet money
its another competator that wants her out of the picture, I wonder if
tanya knew of if the bone heid husband was sick of his wife being 2nd
fiddle and set it up on his own. Either way how good will Tanya and
Nancy work as a team ..???
Mab
|
155.31 | Bobbitt, this is starting to look like Stuart case | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 13:57 | 1 |
|
|
155.32 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:14 | 16 |
| > Either way how good will Tanya and
> Nancy work as a team ..???
There's no teamwork involved. Each skater is out for his/her own good.
It's like luge. two or three single lugers get to go, each hoping to
be the best.
If I'm the #1 luger, and I'm in second place to the USA's #3 luger, I'm
still gonna hump my butt down that run as quick as I can.
The only teammwork involved is to look nice marching into the opening
ceremonies....
'Saw
|
155.33 | Next Bud Light Commercial? | MPGS::MCCARTHY | Mike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468 | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:14 | 7 |
| Figure Skating
Rescue 911
Let's watch both!
Mike
|
155.34 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:15 | 16 |
| > Figure Skating
>
> Rescue 911
>
> Let's watch both!
Only if we can have two remote controls, a satellite dish to get the
Spanish soaps for afterwards, and a refrigerator in the living room
stocked with beer.
Oh yeah, the pizza place has to be on the speed dialer too....
'Saw
|
155.35 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Mark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces. | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:30 | 6 |
|
John Goodman is a riot!
Chap[py
|
155.37 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:45 | 7 |
| >
> That went zooming right over your head, 'Saw.
>
I guess it did....
Funny part is, it's still up there....
|
155.39 | | MKFSA::LONG | 7 more months and he's all yours | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:50 | 4 |
| <static>"Ah, Propbutt 5-7-niner, you are cleared to begin your approach
on runway 2-7."<static>
<static>"Duh....huh?"
|
155.40 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 12 1994 14:52 | 3 |
| do the police also claim that Harding knew about this?
The Crazy Met
|
155.42 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Jan 12 1994 15:05 | 15 |
| > 'Saw, he's talking about the Miller Lite commercials where the
> guy(s) want to watch one thing and the girl(s) want to watch another
> so they put a Lite beer on top of the tv and the two events merge.
> I thought Mike's comment was pretty funny but it loses something if
> you have to have it explained to you.
I guess it had to catch you just right. I knew there was something
I'd missed, but I couldn't figure it out....
Duh, I get in now though.....8^)
'Saw
|
155.43 | This was breaking news as of 8:30 AM... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Jan 12 1994 15:17 | 12 |
|
> It's all just idle speculation right now, TCM. Ridiculous idle
> speculation at that.
Not really. I don't think REK made that bulletin up. As of this
morning on the news I heard that the FBI had witnesses who heard or
overheard these two setting this thing up. That doesn't mean the
witness couldn't be lying and that they're guilty but this thing has
advanced beyond the stages of mere wild speculation...
glenn
|
155.44 | vewy interesting | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Jan 12 1994 18:44 | 12 |
| The Portland Oregonian broke the story about the Harding connection.
What's the scoop out in Seattle, boys?
BTW, that "witness" is reportedly a minister! Let's hope for his
sake that he's not a televangelist or he'll have zero credibility.
MikeL
|
155.45 | Wil-da-beast actually... | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 12 1994 19:22 | 11 |
|
didn't hear anything about it here...of course I sit in my little cube isolated
from the world all day also...
What I do know is that Tonya Harding is a beast and I'd really have a tough
time giving her higher marks than Kerrigan even if Nancy was skating from a
wheelchair...Witt vs. Kerrigan is the only matchup that will satisfy the
skating fanatical audience that the networks are trying to please.....
Metz
|
155.46 | | GWEN::ASHE | Detriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. Champs | Wed Jan 12 1994 20:01 | 2 |
| I heard the minister had an unlisted number... wot's wit dat?
|
155.47 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Wed Jan 12 1994 21:56 | 12 |
| <<< Note 155.27 by USCTR1::KING >>>
> You heard (read) it here first....
>
> Today, at 4:00 pm Detriot Police will announce that Tanya Harding's
> Husband and her bodyguard will be charged with the attack on Nancy
> Kerrigan....
Better dust off that crystal ball, REK...it's almost 10:00 an still no
press conference.
Mark.
|
155.48 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 01:37 | 7 |
| Latest twist is that Harding's husband had her bodyguard hire a
profeesional hitman from Arizona (letsee MikeH take credit for this
guy :-) to hurt Kerrigan. No indication that Tonya Harding has any
knowledg of any of this. Bizarre!
The Crazy Met
|
155.49 | unbelievable... | SALEM::STIG | | Thu Jan 13 1994 06:56 | 4 |
| The report with the minister was that he overheard Hardings husband
talking about either killing Nancy or injuring her.
stig
|
155.50 | | USCTR1::KING | | Thu Jan 13 1994 08:35 | 12 |
| Lufy... so I'm a little early than most people... What can I say..
REK
Some more rumors... Tonya will not be charged with anything... She will
compete in Lilhammer...Nancy will absolve Harding of being a part of
the "hit".. Nany will NOT win the gold and people will say the "hit"
is the reason. Harding will finish about 12th and blame the "hit" as
the reason why she could not focus on her skating... There will be 9
movies made from all this mess...
Tonight's Mass cash numbers will be 4 16 26 33 42... :-}
|
155.51 | Skategate part 1 | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Thu Jan 13 1994 08:52 | 7 |
|
Why are the feds involved ? Are they looking to get an indictment under
some federal stature ? Things sure are heating up in 'Skategate'.
Will they give style points for the trial ?
Wondering why he didn't do the job right and use a Koho.....
|
155.52 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Jan 13 1994 08:59 | 33 |
| > Why are the feds involved ? Are they looking to get an indictment under
> some federal stature ? Things sure are heating up in 'Skategate'.
Probably because the alleged "hit man", allegedly is from Arizona, travelled
to Portland to discuss the "hit" with Harding's bodyguard, travelled to
Boston to carry out the hit, missed Kerrigan there, and then travelled to
Detroit. Crossed state lines it becomes a federal matter.
What I heard on the news just recently was this:
Harding's husband talked with the bodyguard about getting
someone to get Kerrigan out of the way. Supposedly at one
point someone suggested killing her but they decided just to
hit her in the leg.
The bodyguard taped the conversation (musta been a Nixon disciple)
and contacted the hit man. He later played the tape for a minister
friend of his. The minister contacted PI Gary Crowe to tell him
what he knew.
(I don't understand why the minister went to the PI and not the
police except that he is friends with Crowe).
Crowe contact the police.
I've heard arrest is imminent and that Harding herself, while
disavowing any knowledge, will be charged....
that was what I heard on the ride in....
'Saw
|
155.53 | | GWEN::ASHE | Detriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. Champs | Thu Jan 13 1994 09:05 | 10 |
| Paramount's already trying to work on something...
What do you think:
Kerrigan - Phoebe Cates? The daughter on Roseanne? Amy Bannerman?
Harding - Torey Spelling? Alyssa Milano? Six from Blossom?
Bodyguard - Jason Alexander? Dennis Franz? Ed O'Neill?
Husband - Luke Perry? David Faustino?
Paul Wylie - Neal Patrick Harris?
Mom - Florence Henderson?
Dad - Bill Kirkenbauer?
|
155.54 | the buttofouco's???? | SALEM::STIG | | Thu Jan 13 1994 09:22 | 7 |
| no matter what happens all the people involved are going to make money.
Thats why this incident happened. It's a shame that criminals may end
up getting a profit out of incidents like this. Broadway can make
anyone famous whether your a criminal or not...
stig
|
155.55 | Addlebrained interview with Crowe last night | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jan 13 1994 09:35 | 17 |
| Quickly,
Crowe was on Andleman last night; I adjudged his purpose as getting
the Reverend's side of the story into the press and media before a
complete gag order is in effect. Crowe stated that the rev. is already
under a gag order.
The Rev. is 24; Andelman failed to ask Crowe what the relationship
was between the Rev. and the bodyguard other than that they knew each
other.
Finally a tape was surreptitiously made of the "hit" meeting, not
necessarily by bodyguard.
Conclusion btw on reverend is that he had knowledge of impending
attack prior.
Andelman in his own inimitable way made a complete hash of
interview and missed all the salient points. This is only one of many
illustrations of how stupid Eddie is; but successful.
|
155.56 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Thu Jan 13 1994 09:43 | 27 |
|
As far as I can see it was a simple assault, a misdemeaner and conspiracy
to commit an assault. Does this require the feds ? I don't want to
sound un-PC or anything but this is getting out of hand. Legally as I see
it (I'm not a lawyer and don't pretend to be one) there are a few
criminal charges and some civil ones pending. (NK will be able to sue
her attackers for lost revenue, i would assume)
So what happens to her attackers ? Probably a 6 month jail sentence and
a fine. BFD. Here we have the FEDS, Detriot PD, and the Oregon PD
working on this made for T.V. movie. The three people involved will
turn against each other so only two will be tried. I figure one will
rat on the other two for immunity. (Bodyguard) The other two will plea
bargain to some lesser charge. Next up are the movie/book/tv rights for
sale, and everyone involved will make some cash. If I were the Judge I
would award all financial gains form these deals to NK, or impose a no
profit rule. (Ya, right)
What a country, commit a minor crime and make millions off it, and get
you local/state/federal police forces in on it so there's your tax
dollars at work. I doubt they had anything better to do anyway, right?
(Police)
Twisted, real effin twisted.
|
155.58 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Jan 13 1994 09:54 | 19 |
| > As far as I can see it was a simple assault, a misdemeaner and conspiracy
> to commit an assault. Does this require the feds ? I don't want to
> sound un-PC or anything but this is getting out of hand. Legally as I see
> it (I'm not a lawyer and don't pretend to be one) there are a few
> criminal charges and some civil ones pending. (NK will be able to sue
> her attackers for lost revenue, i would assume)
I think the point is that it was a conspiracy that crossed state lines,
and that makes it federal. (Kind of like the old days when post offices
could be in general stores -- hit the general store for $10 in an armed
robbery, and it became a federal rap).
But I'm no expert.....I don't even play one on TV....
'Saw
|
155.59 | What does the FBI do, then? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 13 1994 10:17 | 15 |
|
Only simple assault and just a misdemeanor? I don't know about that.
You've supposedly got a tape where someone brings up, in seriousness,
the possibility of *killing* Kerrigan. Whether the conspirators
ultimately decided to go through with that or not, they then hire
someone to execute the plan. I don't equate that with someone taking
a swing at someone else in a spontaneous moment. This story will no
doubt be overexposed to the hilt but this is the kind of thing I'd
expect the FBI to be involved with. For starters, before they got
these leads, they didn't know what kind of a psychopath they were
dealing with. When you're dealing with celebrity stalkers it could
turn out to be someone who eventually takes a crack at the president...
glenn
|
155.60 | | FRETZ::HEISER | it ain't me | Thu Jan 13 1994 10:46 | 5 |
| > profeesional hitman from Arizona (letsee MikeH take credit for this
> guy :-) to hurt Kerrigan. No indication that Tonya Harding has any
probably Mexican Mafia, kind of like the Italian group you have in NYC,
Craze.
|
155.61 | more as I hear it | FRETZ::HEISER | it ain't me | Thu Jan 13 1994 10:48 | 1 |
| I know the AZ FBI folks are involved in the mess.
|
155.62 | Phoebe's shining moment was Fast Times @ Ridgemont High | FRETZ::HEISER | it ain't me | Thu Jan 13 1994 10:50 | 9 |
| > Kerrigan - Phoebe Cates? The daughter on Roseanne? Amy Bannerman?
> Harding - Torey Spelling? Alyssa Milano? Six from Blossom?
> Bodyguard - Jason Alexander? Dennis Franz? Ed O'Neill?
> Husband - Luke Perry? David Faustino?
> Paul Wylie - Neal Patrick Harris?
> Mom - Florence Henderson?
> Dad - Bill Kirkenbauer?
Walt you need to get out more.
|
155.64 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Jan 13 1994 10:57 | 6 |
|
Nah, Bam Bam Bigelow should play the bodyguard and James Olmos the
husband.
|
155.65 | wow imagine that | FRETZ::HEISER | it ain't me | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:18 | 6 |
| > I think you're wrong again, Archie Bunker. The name of the hitman, as
> it's being reported in Boston, is Shane Stant. That doesn't sound like
> Mexican Mafia to me.
Well George Jefferson, I have a novel idea for you: you don't have to
be Mexican to join!
|
155.66 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:24 | 5 |
|
What specific laws have been broken ? If you or I where smacked in an
airport would the feds help out ? The whole thing stinks, and the media
are the typical hungry wolves. I switched on the news and the reporter
was describing that they sent out for pizza. My god, What's next ?
|
155.68 | okay Butthead | FRETZ::HEISER | it ain't me | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:28 | 1 |
| > "Italian group that you have in New York"? Let go of your hangups, Beavis.
|
155.69 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:40 | 14 |
| re: Feds
Feds are in based on a racketerring law passed in the 1930's as well
as the crossing state lines deal.
Laws: assault with a dangerous weapon
conspiracy
That is just a start. The first being a felony.
You may hate all the hype, news reports, etc. but there is a legal
basis for the Feds to be involved.
The Crazy Met
|
155.70 | Separating the media hype from law enforcement issue... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:41 | 22 |
|
> What specific laws have been broken ? If you or I where smacked in an
> airport would the feds help out ? The whole thing stinks, and the media
> are the typical hungry wolves. I switched on the news and the reporter
> was describing that they sent out for pizza. My god, What's next ?
I don't care what the media and then the moviemakers do. They're
idiots, but they're not on the public dole. Do you doubt that a
felony has occurred, when several people plot an interstate
conspiracy to maim a person, and then successfully execute the plan
with an assault with a weapon? It falls short of attempted murder
and conspiracy to commit murder but it's got to be the next level
below, felonious assault and conspiracy and certainly not misdemeanor
assault. I just can't be *that* cynical about government to say that
federal law enforcement shouldn't be involved in bringing such nuts to
justice before they actually kill someone (and yes, I'd feel the same
way if some nut went to such lengths across the country to assault you
in the airport, as implausible as that might be). Otherwise, there's
not much point in having an FBI, except to clean up after the fact...
glenn
|
155.71 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:41 | 4 |
|
> "Italian group that you have in New York"?
Get your facts straight, ain't Italian, it's the Sicilian boys
your trying to name. I guess that makes me involved then...
|
155.72 | Maybe some of these other things were "hits" too | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:47 | 8 |
| The big question now is Was Stephie Graf or someone close to her
involved in the Monica Seles stabbing? Does this incident make the
odds go up that MS was a "hit". I'd say its 50-50.
And, Michael Jordan's father's death is now 30-70 that it was connected
to MJs unsavory non-NBA life.
Because "Crazy" is now commonplace.
|
155.73 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Mark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces. | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:49 | 11 |
|
Back to the Made for TV movie.
Brian Denehey (sp) and Richard Crenna could play the lead FBI men.
Shannon Doherty could be Harding (with a wig?)
Chappy
|
155.74 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:50 | 6 |
| > Because "Crazy" is now commonplace.
hey I resent that :-)
The Crazy Met
|
155.75 | another twist | FRETZ::HEISER | it ain't me | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:50 | 5 |
| > And, Michael Jordan's father's death is now 30-70 that it was connected
> to MJs unsavory non-NBA life.
I hear the 2 accused of killing James Jordan are now claiming he was
already dead when they found him.
|
155.76 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 11:55 | 9 |
| �I switched on the news and the reporter
� was describing that they sent out for pizza. My god, What's next ?
I saw that. Apparently the media listened to REK's report and were
awaiting that 4 pm statement from the Detroit police. They were
gathered around Kerrigan's house to get a reaction to the
newsconference which never occurred. The pizza remark was a thankyou
to the neighbors and the Kerrigan's for helping the news crews get some
dinner.
|
155.77 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:00 | 12 |
| � -< Maybe some of these other things were "hits" too >-
�
� The big question now is Was Stephie Graf or someone close to her
� involved in the Monica Seles stabbing? Does this incident make the
� odds go up that MS was a "hit". I'd say its 50-50.
�
� And, Michael Jordan's father's death is now 30-70 that it was connected
� to MJs unsavory non-NBA life.
You're really reaching here, Bill. I think it has been pretty well
shown that there was no grassy noll in Germany and that MJ's father was
a victim of random violence.
|
155.78 | media stock... | SALEM::STIG | | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:10 | 10 |
| I couln't believe channel five did a news report on Nancy across from
her house. Mike Dowling was out in the snow and said that the Kerruigan
household was waiting in the house and trying to live a normal type of
life away from everyone. Yet,the media continues to hang around the
house. They saw Nancy left the house one time during the day..Sometimes
I wonder who the real "stalkers" are...
what about John Candy as the "bodyguard"...
stig
|
155.79 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Patriot Games? | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:26 | 5 |
| I think one can safely state that the Bobbits, the Branch Davidians
and the Mega(Sissy)Plex have dropped below the Nancy Kerrigan Assault
in the Feeding Frenzy department.
/Don
|
155.81 | | GIAMEM::SCHOTT | | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:37 | 21 |
| Hypothetically, let's say that Tonya Harding's husband and body
guard are indicted for various crimes, but that Harding herself is not.
She would then remain eligible to compete in the Olympic Games as the
reigning U.S. Champion. Imagine if you will the negative crowd
reaction and the the attendant media circus that will follow her every
move for the next month, leading up to the competition in Lillehammer?
I do not believe there is any possible way that she could be focused
enough to compete against the best the world.
The picture is almost as glum for Nancy Kerrigan. First she has
to overcome the injury she suffered in Detroit, and the downtime away
from the practice ice. Then once she recovers enough to resume
training, she has to put up with clowns in the media, camped outside
her home and rifling through her discarded pizza boxes, trying to
determine if she orders double cheese or not. She too will have a very
difficult time trying to regain her competitive edge in time for
Lillehammer. If I her were her I'd immediately assemble her entourage
and disappear to some small town in Europe for the next month!
Russ
|
155.82 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:44 | 4 |
| So now that our figure skating hopes are shot, we can concentrate
on the REAL reason I'm interested in the Winter Olympics,
Bobsledding......
|
155.83 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:45 | 23 |
| �Dan Shaughnessy, who must have some-
� thing big to hang over the sports editor's head, equates the news of
� what happened to Nancy Kerrigan to the death of Reggie Lewis and the
� news Magic Johnson testing HIV+. Get real, Dan.
Well, when you consider that figure skating is the number 1 sport for
the TV audience according to more than one poll, I guess it is as big
a deal as the others.
� typical of this culture of gossip that has developed in this country that
� both stories eclipse such mundane topics as ethnic cleansing in Bosnia, a
� serial child killer in western Mass and upstate New York and a possible pres-
� idential scandal.
I guess I'm watching the wrong shows, but I don't see any eclipsing
going on here. All of these stories are prominent (OK, Bosnia is
slipping since it has been going on so long).
�John Q.
� Public gets whacked in the parking lot of the Wiggly Piggly over his pay-
� check.
But what about Suzy Q? And I thought it was Piggly Wiggly.
|
155.84 | | FRETZ::HEISER | it ain't me | Thu Jan 13 1994 12:55 | 2 |
| It's really Isiah Thomas that hit a female figure-skater and ran away
in Detroit.
|
155.85 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:05 | 24 |
|
Wait until she (NK) goes to the olympics. If I think it's overblown now
when (IF) she medals it will equal a cure for aids in the
sports/media world.
Can't wait.
Give me Luge,Hockey,Bobbsledding, skiing and the xcountry shooting
matches anyday. Figureskating is the last thing to watch.(IMO) So what
we'll get is 90% figureskating, up close and pesonal with how tough it
is, 10% on the rest of the olympics. Only stuffed in between the
reports of NK going to the bathroom and what type anti-persperant she put
on today.
Sad thing is, I would like to hear about the athelete that struggled to
make his/her sport while working and keeping a family together.
Qualifies, competes against the worlds best and comes home. Boring, but
I thought that was what the 'pics where all about, not some warped plot
of a deranged group morons who need to have the s#it beat out of them
and tossed in jail for 5 years or so. The did it because they thought
they could get away with it, even if caught they probably know that
it's a win-win situation.
Sad but we'll here this until mid sumer.
|
155.86 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:11 | 6 |
| 'Saw
Is bobsleeding the sport the US team has achance to medalin for the
first time in decades?? Or is it luge?
The Crazy Met
|
155.87 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:19 | 18 |
| � Sad thing is, I would like to hear about the athelete that struggled to
� make his/her sport while working and keeping a family together.
� Qualifies, competes against the worlds best and comes home.
Don't worry, you'll get plenty of that when they aren't covering figure
skating. Most of it will probably be focused on the athletes coming
from war torn nations.
�Boring, but
� I thought that was what the 'pics where all about, not some warped plot
� of a deranged group morons who need to have the s#it beat out of them
� and tossed in jail for 5 years or so.
I think you're letting this incident get to you a little too much. I
haven't seen anyone defining the Olympics based on this one incident.
You're also showing a little naivete. The day of the self funded
athlete are long gone (if they were ever there -- before corporate
money there was family money).
|
155.88 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:22 | 5 |
| Some of the less glamarous sports - Luge, Bobsledding come to mind - were
given very little funding until the last 8-10 years. In the 1960-1970's
there were likely a lot of self-funded atheletes.
The Crazy Met
|
155.89 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:24 | 5 |
| �In the 1960-1970's
�there were likely a lot of self-funded atheletes.
Yabbut, did that self funding put a cramp in their style or was mommy &
daddy warbucks backing them?
|
155.90 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:28 | 10 |
|
Some of the lesser sports had almost no funding and it was left up to
the athelete to get it through fund raisers and drives. Now we have pro
football players doing bobsled and such. Ptooie. The biggies will
always have the cash, the more obscure sports don't or should I say
didn't.
Maybe I am letting it get to me, but WTF it's everywhere I turn.
|
155.91 | Only Thing Missing are the 2 brothers who killer there parents | MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKS | | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:33 | 25 |
| Ok Bosnia, well after hearing how much we spent on the Iraq war, and
then how much money we gave to Russia Im a little sick of this contry
sending its troops and spend Mucho $$$ On everywere else except here in
america.
The Killer from Western MA, here's a guy who admits guilt, draws a map
and then would have shown them were the body(s) were but a lawyer steps
in and tells him to NO COMMENT, this lawyer should be shot, what about
the poor parents of the kids that dont know for sure...
The President, All politics are crooks and guilty, enough said...
Nancy, An olymipic GOld Medailist Hopefule, from MA is attacked more
then likly from a competator's husband/bodyguard.... Id say its worthy
of the news, I bought the paper today to read about this and only this
and then checked out the sports page..
If the president is a crook, it will be coverd up, with a lawyer
involved the Mass Murderer is INSANE and will plead that way, Bobbit
the guy was an animal, does he deserve to be dismember'd proberbly not
and Bosnia, if we can screw it up spend millions and do little help,
thats what will
happen........................................................................
MaB
|
155.92 | The Kerrigan story is tough to ignore, but in general... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:34 | 17 |
|
Not only is Shaughnessy's column overblown but I think it's insincere.
I think basically he was told he had to write on this very important
topic of compelling interest and probably like most sports guys didn't
want to, so he gave it the old half-hearted "isn't that horrible, how
shocking" treatment. A weak effort...
The Bobbitt coverage is much worse, though, imo. I really thought this
would die very shortly after it got any mention at all. The reason
this case has received any notice is very superficial if you think
about it. I'm kind of surprised that this act or something close to it
hasn't happened many many times before given the general moral
deprivation and violence in this country, and maybe it has but it took
a certain sequence of reporting events to set it off.
glenn
|
155.93 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Thu Jan 13 1994 13:55 | 5 |
|
Would someone please send me mail when this current conversation is
over and we get back to the Winter Olympics. Thank you.
Marc
|
155.94 | Slasher goes Hollywood | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Thu Jan 13 1994 14:24 | 1 |
| The role of the bodyguard is MADE for Don Robichaud...
|
155.95 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 14:29 | 5 |
| re: .94
nah, you need to find a cynic that /er can play.
The Crazy Met
|
155.96 | Insert.... | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Jan 13 1994 14:33 | 7 |
|
>>nah, you need to find a cynic that /er can play.
Er, the "Tommy Brydie Story"??
MikeL
|
155.97 | The plot thickens... | MYMUSE::MASHIA | Every lil' thing gonna be all right | Thu Jan 13 1994 14:44 | 5 |
| Just heard on the radio driving in that Tonya Harding will be
arrested, along with her ex-, bodyguard, and two others - on conspiracy
charges. Apparently she was in it from the gitgo.
Rodney
|
155.98 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 14:57 | 7 |
| so does she now get stripped of the title? does Kwan go instead of her?
If Harding was in on it from the beginning sh is too stupid to go anywhere!
She was basically guaranteed a #1 or #2 finish which meant sh was going to
the Olympics.
The Crazy Met
|
155.99 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:12 | 4 |
| �so does she now get stripped of the title? does Kwan go instead of her?
Considering that the courts are about the only place where folks are
innocent until proven otherwise, I wouldn't be surprised.
|
155.100 | heard on the radion thised morning... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:26 | 3 |
| The "US Olympic Code Of Conduct" prohibits athletes under indicment from being
on the 'lympic team.
|
155.101 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:33 | 17 |
| Bobsledding is the event that we have a chance to medal in.
Due to efforts by Geoff Bodine and a chassis shop in Oxford Ct (why
does the name Chassis Dynamics come to mind) the USA now has an
entire fleet of "Made in the USA" bobsleds.
They're fast, and they're quiet. The Europeans call them "stealth"
because you can't hear them coming -- seriously.
IBM is heavily involved, donating computer equipment, from PS/2 systems
to laptops, which can plug right into the sleds and dowload telemetry
from the runs.
A high tech operation, definitely....
'Saw
|
155.102 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:39 | 5 |
| and if the new bobsleds really work then the governing body will probably
pass some rules to make them illegal - it is not all that far fetched;
just look at the IAAF.
The Crazy Met
|
155.103 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:41 | 4 |
| If the US has a chance to medal, you can bet that CBS will provide heavy
doses of it.
The Crazy Met
|
155.104 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:46 | 2 |
| Is bobsledding really a sport? Afterall, it's the earth's gravity and
the bobsled design engineers that do the work.
|
155.105 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:47 | 6 |
| Mac,
do you want me to forward your question - not this note, but the question
contained in it - to JD??
The Crazy Met
|
155.106 | | MTWAIN::BURROWS | Racers Ready...3,..2,..1,.. | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:50 | 13 |
| 'Saw,
It is interesting that the new bobsleds are quiet. I grew up in upstate
NY not too far from Lake Placid, and I can tell you that the older
sleds made a real racket, something you don't expect at first.
I suspect you have been there to watch them slide? It is one of those
sports which is phenomenal when witnessed in person; much better than
on TV. Of course, in my opinion, no sport is as spectacular "live", while
being as dull on TV, as ski jumping... you gotta see that live to
believe it!
Clark
|
155.107 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:51 | 3 |
| Ain't nobody gonna sled over me this winter...
=Bob=
|
155.108 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:53 | 5 |
| � I suspect you have been there to watch them slide?
Nah, 'Saw is just getting caught up with the NASCAR connection. Are
the guys in the sled going to be allowed to chew tobaccy or will that
effect the track conditions?
|
155.109 | Looks like that Soviet Skater has the Gold | WREATH::SCOPA | | Thu Jan 13 1994 15:53 | 4 |
| So we're looking at a cripple and a convict to go for the gold at
Sledgehammer...erh Lillihammer....what a country.
Maj
|
155.111 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 16:10 | 7 |
| > Are the guys in the sled going to be allowed to chew tobaccy
> or will that effect the track conditions?
as long as they don't spit it out on the track.
The Crazy Met
|
155.112 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Thu Jan 13 1994 16:14 | 6 |
| They'd have a new condition, Brown Ice.
Yuck
JaKe
|
155.113 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Thu Jan 13 1994 16:22 | 16 |
|
NASCAR guys doing the chassis ? all I can say is it's about time a good
ol merican sled was designed. I hope they do well and medal.
I have never seen a Bobsled race live. Sounds like it would be a great
event to see in person. Have to put that on the list of must see before
I croak!
Back to figure skating, maybe it's my inner self that dispises them so
much, they only ruin the ice for the real sport that was made to be
played on ice....hockey.8*)
Will IBM's name be on the sled under the flag ?
|
155.114 | Nothing is too crazy any more | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Jan 13 1994 16:39 | 10 |
| Mac,
My point was that specualtion eg Michael Jordan and dad,Seles.. is
normally dismissed a la the "grassy knoll" response.
But this time the wierdest possible speculation proved correct.
But I guess I am reaching a little.
But if I could get a bet down on either spec. at good odds I'd take
it.
|
155.115 | | GWEN::ASHE | No one here 'cept us chickens... | Thu Jan 13 1994 17:15 | 15 |
| >> <<< Note 155.62 by FRETZ::HEISER "it ain't me" >>>
>> -< Phoebe's shining moment was Fast Times @ Ridgemont High >-
> Kerrigan - Phoebe Cates? The daughter on Roseanne? Amy Bannerman?
> Harding - Torey Spelling? Alyssa Milano? Six from Blossom?
> Bodyguard - Jason Alexander? Dennis Franz? Ed O'Neill?
> Husband - Luke Perry? David Faustino?
> Paul Wylie - Neal Patrick Harris?
> Mom - Florence Henderson?
> Dad - Bill Kirkenbauer?
>> Walt you need to get out more.
I get out a lot, that's why I don't watch enough to know who's current
and who's not. Maybe I should be home more....
|
155.116 | | GWEN::ASHE | No one here 'cept us chickens... | Thu Jan 13 1994 17:22 | 3 |
| Bobsled ain't as manly as the luge. We might medal there too...
Isiah works out in Auburn Hills, not downtown Detriot(tm).
|
155.117 | | CELTIK::JACOB | | Thu Jan 13 1994 18:30 | 18 |
|
>>Bobsledding is the event that we have a chance to medal in.
>>Due to efforts by Geoff Bodine and a chassis shop in Oxford Ct (why
>>does the name Chassis Dynamics come to mind) the USA now has an
>>entire fleet of "Made in the USA" bobsleds.
Hey, being a NASCAR type has been working on these, and we know most
NASCARites are good ol' boys from the south, does this make the sleds:
Billy_Bobsleds??????
Inquiring mindless and all that stuff
JaKe
|
155.118 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Thu Jan 13 1994 18:44 | 4 |
| tori spelling as Tonya harding...nah...more like one of those American
Gladiator chicks...
Metz
|
155.119 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Jan 13 1994 19:58 | 5 |
| latest report is that Tonya Harding is not implicated in the attack on
Kerrigan.
The Crazy Met
|
155.120 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 08:42 | 12 |
| > I suspect you have been there to watch them slide? It is one of those
> sports which is phenomenal when witnessed in person; much better than
> on TV. Of course, in my opinion, no sport is as spectacular "live", while
> being as dull on TV, as ski jumping... you gotta see that live to
> believe it!
No, actually, I saw an excellent report on the team on PRIME sports....
They talked with Bodine and then the fellow from Chassis Dynamics.
Then they showed footage of the new sleds.
'Saw
|
155.121 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 14 1994 08:44 | 6 |
|
For me Bobsledding and Luge are some of the purist forms of racing.
Man & machine vs. the track. Minor errors cost you time and major ones
could cost you serious injury. Love that edge.
|
155.122 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 08:46 | 26 |
| > Nah, 'Saw is just getting caught up with the NASCAR connection. Are
> the guys in the sled going to be allowed to chew tobaccy or will that
> effect the track conditions?
Hey, laugh while you can Monkey Boy....
It's pretty pathetic that it took Bodine having to put out his own money
to get our team decent equipment when supposedly they have a team and
organization that is supposed to take care of all that.
But it's good that we did.
And when you think about it, it's a pretty good correlation, since most
of the strides in chassis devlepment in this country are made by NASCAR, and
that engineering applies pretty well to bobsleds.
Further, none of the drivers I know chew tobacco. The closest one comes
to that is old James Hilton, who chews on his cigars. Besides, Bodine
is a northern boy from Chemung, NY.
And on a coincident note, the son of the barber who cuts my hair used to
race against Bodine out in Stafford....but the kid lost a lot...8^)
'Saw
|
155.123 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 08:48 | 12 |
| > Will IBM's name be on the sled under the flag ?
The sleds I saw had some really bodacious color schemes, the nicest one
having like a stylized eagel head running around to the nose.
If I'm not mistaken, the IBM logo was very small, on the nose of the
sled. The Chassis Dynamics logo is on the side somewhere....
'Saw
|
155.124 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 08:49 | 8 |
| > Bobsled ain't as manly as the luge. We might medal there too...
Girl from CT made the women's luge team.
Both sports are pretty dangerous.....
'Saw
|
155.125 | Bobsled is gonna be great this year.... | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 08:52 | 10 |
| > Hey, being a NASCAR type has been working on these, and we know most
> NASCARites are good ol' boys from the south, does this make the sleds:
Bodine is from Chemung, NY, and Chassis Dynamics is from Oxford CT.
Lots of northern boys are into NASCAR now....
'Saw
|
155.126 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 14 1994 08:52 | 7 |
|
I wonder why the sleds don't have sponsorship logos showing. The skiers
do. Must be an IOC rule or some type of regulation. If it were my sled
I would seek as much sposorship as possable and advertise my sponsors
logos big, bold and bright. What a golden opportunity to get instant
name recognition. (Listening Digital marketing ?)
|
155.127 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 08:53 | 10 |
| One final note....
It was interesting that both Bodine and the fellow from Chassis Dynamics
said that the deadlines for this project were incredible. They said that
when they first got involved, they were not aware of the fact that the
Olympics were going to be staggered, and that their development time would
essentially be cut in half.....
'Saw
|
155.128 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:06 | 6 |
| > name recognition. (Listening Digital marketing ?)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Hahahaha....
|
155.129 | | GIAMEM::SCHOTT | | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:29 | 9 |
| Back to SkateGate for a moment, does anyone have the feeling
that WCVB (Channel 5 - Boston) is a long way out on thin ice and
feeling a bit exposed this morning, by prematurely reporting that an
arrest warrant had been issued on Tonya Harding? Even Peter Jennings,
reporting from Moscow made mention of the report "out of Boston".
The Channel 5 Sports Crew seems to be giving Hard Copy a run for their
money.
Russ
|
155.130 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:31 | 5 |
|
I heard on CNN as I was walking by the tube in PKO that a well
respected Boston station has reported the arrest warrants have been
issued. Well respected ? Double ptooie.
|
155.131 | For Mac | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:31 | 15 |
| TCM -
Bobsledding a sport. Well, after all, it can be
considered HUMAN POWERED, since it is the initial
push that gets them going. It's not like they
have an ignition key, an engine, and need gasoline
to make it go - like in Car Racing or MotorCycle Racing.
It's sort of like Bicycling - the sport is extremely
assisted by mechanical means - so it isn't a "pure"
sport - but at least it requires more than the ability
to wear sponser's logos, sweat, and remembering to
press the gas to go, the brake to stop....
JD
|
155.132 | For JD: LEFT/RIGHT/LEFT/RIGHT/LEFT/RIGHT/LEFT/RIGHT (etc.) | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:34 | 0 |
155.133 | For Bob:Lesee you do some LeftRigths with us... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:41 | 0 |
155.134 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:44 | 3 |
| �Even Peter Jennings,
nit: That was Morton Dean, not Jennings.
|
155.135 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:47 | 9 |
| � I heard on CNN as I was walking by the tube in PKO that a well
� respected Boston station has reported the arrest warrants have been
� issued. Well respected ? Double ptooie.
Well they must be respected by somebody if CNN and ABC (perhaps more, I
was only tuned into ABC this morning) is perpetuating the story. FWIW,
ABC reported that 2 arrests have been made and that more on coming.
ABC did mention that WCVB reports Tonya Harding might be arrested as
well.
|
155.136 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:49 | 7 |
| The DA specifically stated that Harding is not a suspect and not being
charged with anything.
Harding's bodyguard and the driver of the getaway car were arrested in
Portland. 2 other arrests expected today.
The Crazy Met
|
155.137 | Tonya Harding's future is doomed regardless of her status | KALI::MORGAN | | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:59 | 6 |
| I would think that with the possibility of Harding being removed from
the Olympic team should she be arrested, they'll make damn sure they
have a hands down case against her. I just don't see that happening
unless either she or her husband implicate her.
Steve
|
155.138 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:06 | 23 |
|
Warrants do not necessarily have to be issued. The DA *might* have
drawn up a sealed arrest warrant for Tonya. Channel 5 might be going
on some inside sources and the spin is on in Portland. Who knows..
This is getting weirder. The press is camped out in Stoneham, Mass. as
well as all over Portland (Harding's house, her stepfathers, rink,
etc.) and no one has seen Tonya at all for two days.
Yo Mac, I think you might have something.. Bobsled, luge.. what do
these people do, give themselves a push, jump on and go Wheeeeeee!
I cain do that on mah hill...
TH,
I ain't a fan of figure skating at all but I remember an old quote of
Derek Sanderson. He said if hockey players were in half as great a
shape as figure skaters, you'd only need one line, one D and one 10
minute break in a 60 minute game ( I played hockey extensively so ah
know what kind of shape hockey players is in). Now I don't know if
Derek said that while sipping a few at Fathers Too.. 8^)
MikeL
|
155.139 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:26 | 13 |
|
Figure skaters are strong, have great stamina and some serious moves. I
wish I had some. Also mentally tough as well. Besides, I think that the
female skaters have the nicest glutes on the planet, I would like to
see a little more skin from those costumes.....I just hate what the do to
the ice surface.
The Turk respects the talent of the FS as I do. He may have been
streching it abit, but some of what he said was true. They have good
bursts of power and exceptional balance, two musts for any pro NHL'er.
Now if we can just get the Turk in the booth instead of Dick Buttons.
|
155.140 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:27 | 6 |
|
I think you're exactly right, Mike. They procure arrest warrants
ahead of time so that, in case they need it, they don't have to
wake up a judge in the middle o' the night.
Probably not entirely legal but hey, this is the FBI.
dr.a
|
155.142 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 14 1994 11:09 | 25 |
| Oh jeez,
Here we go again with the victim thing again. This maroon is Western
Mass, the guy who allegedly raped and murdered three young girls,
is all of a sudden a victim of his evironment because he ws abused as
a kid. Now po' po' Tonya. Did she get hit with a tire iron?
Now Tonya will be looked upon as a victim of her tough upbringing
and surrounding herself with idiots. And she condones press releases
from her fan club members excoriating her competitors and threatening
press members if they write anything negative about her.
She may not be guilty of anything but let's not paint her as a victim.
Christ, Kerrigan gets whacked and Harding's first words "I'm going
to prove I'm #1." Then when Kerrigan gets named to the team,
"I'm gonna kick her butt." Classy lady. She surrounds herself with
lowlifes and she's a victim. You reap what you sow. She ain't no
victim, regardless of whether she's culpable or not. I don't think
anyone cried "Tonya's a victim, too" after she chased some woman last
year with a baseball bat following a car accident.
Personally, I can't see how she didn't know anything about the
conspiring of those close to her. But in this country you're supposedly
innnocent until proven guilty.. but that doesn't make her a victim.
MikeL
|
155.143 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 14 1994 11:12 | 11 |
|
Agreed 100% Tommy. On the other hand (and this is just hypothetical),
if Harding knew what was up behind the attack-- even after the fact, in
which case she is still not guilty-- and then a couple of nights later went
out and nailed her program and brazenly told the country how good she is,
she's got some of the iciest veins I've ever seen in an athlete. If
that were the case I might not be worried how she holds up under the
pressure of the Olympics...
glenn
|
155.144 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 14 1994 11:43 | 5 |
|
Tonya Harding = Pam Smart, surprised the media hasn't nailed that
angle... yet.
|
155.145 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jan 14 1994 11:48 | 9 |
| >She surrounds herself with
> lowlifes and she's a victim. You reap what you sow.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
She may be completely innocent and until proven otherwise I'll give her
the benefit of the doubt. I hope she skates well in the Olympics.
But she ain't no victim. The above says it all.
Keith
|
155.146 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:02 | 12 |
| Usually the DA will not say anything before arrests are made, warrants
issued, etc. For the DA to come out and say that Harding is not a
suspect is unusual. As far as I'm concerned it was irresponsible of ABC
and then WCVB to say that Harding was a suspect unless they had
irrefutable sources for that.
And yes Harding is also victimized by this whole sordid affair. But
saying that does not mean that Kerrigan is not a victim. The two are
not mutually exclusive.
The Crazy Met
|
155.147 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:02 | 7 |
| > -< Tonya Harding's future is doomed regardless of her status >-
Not really. I think most FSs get their money from endorsements.
Harding would still be able to get some, for THe Club, for instance.
brews
|
155.148 | Ooops... | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:25 | 14 |
|
With regards to the oh_so_fine_Bodine_Design Bob Sled, the first
test run in Lillehammer resulted in a crash on Turn 2, about
6 seconds out of the chute.
The reaction from Geoff Bodine?
"Holy $hit, you mean there's RIGHT turns in this sport?
|
155.149 | HAHAHAHAHAHA brews, levity to break the er, ice! | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 14 1994 12:25 | 1 |
|
|
155.150 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:02 | 12 |
| >
> "Holy $hit, you mean there's RIGHT turns in this sport?
>
Geoff is actually pretty good at right turns. He won the race at
Sonoma on the road course last season, if I remember correctly.
Course, I can't remember the damn name of the race course.....
'Saw
|
155.151 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Patriot Games? | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:05 | 10 |
| � TH,
� I ain't a fan of figure skating at all but I remember an old quote of
� Derek Sanderson. He said if hockey players were in half as great a
� shape as figure skaters, you'd only need one line, one D and one 10
� minute break in a 60 minute game ( I played hockey extensively so ah
I disagree MikeL, I think you would need lots of fill-ins for when
someone breaks their nail and has to spend 10-20 days on injured reserved.
/Don
|
155.153 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:39 | 6 |
| > smiling ice queens, that we've always had, anyday. I've always pre-
> ferred real people to replicants.
"Solyent Green is PEOPLE! It's PEOPLE!"
|
155.154 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:53 | 12 |
| RE: 155.152
Someone told Kent Hrbek he needed to buy a vowel.
Man, you need to buy some commas, or even a period. I
nearly wore out my eyes reading that string. 8-)>
Harding is toast, regardless. She could win the gold, find
the cure for cancer and AIDS, walk on water, and rebuild
a Hemi blindfolded and she'd still be toast.
Scott
|
155.155 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:02 | 5 |
| � RE: 155.152
Au Contre (sp), I re-read the note, and it is perfectly punctuated.
The 'Cadet
|
155.156 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:12 | 6 |
| re: .155
Show off!
The Crazy Met
|
155.157 | Save yo' obfuscations for the Seminoles | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:22 | 18 |
| Poifectly punctuated with hyperbole dat is..
What the hail you talking about? Let's not try to obfuscate
and confuse things here.
Whether I like her or not means squat to the "victim" premise.
I scanned an article in USA Today that brought forth the
"victim" argument in Harding's defense. Bullsugar.
If she's innocent and has had no idea what her compatriots were up
to fine.. but she ain't no victim. That's my only point.
So what if she's busted her butt.. you don't think Kerrigan and
countless others have done the same?
MikeL
|
155.158 | Damaging? You bet... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:32 | 13 |
|
> If she's innocent and has had no idea what her compatriots were up
> to fine.. but she ain't no victim. That's my only point.
I dunno, Mike. Having the likes of Channel 5 telling the world that
you're about to be arrested *if* it isn't true and you are in fact
completely innocent isn't exactly a great career booster. As for the
other stuff about personalities, I don't see any point in taking sides.
Not living up to a phony image is no more commendable than having such
a phony image bestowed upon you.
glenn
|
155.160 | Curiouser and curiouser | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:48 | 10 |
| She is at the point where to salvage anything she needs to make a
public disavowal of her two ex'es (hubbie & bodyguard). She needs a
scriptwriter at this point (Tommy? - you available, Sorenson's busy) to
pull off the victim thing.
But if she makes the plea and sells it the whole thing may work in her
favor as it ironically has for Kerrigan.
In fact, Mac if you really want "grassy knoll" theory how about Nancy
masterminded the whole thing - :-):-) (just broke my rule)
|
155.161 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:51 | 6 |
| >Au Contre (sp), I re-read the note, and it is perfectly punctuated.
fyi -- au contraire
8^)
|
155.162 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Patriot Games? | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:52 | 4 |
| I don't like Harding. Everytime she smiles it looks like her face
is going to break. That alone should warrant an arrest.
/Don
|
155.163 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 14 1994 15:59 | 15 |
| Yabbut glenn,
If damaging she has legal recourse no?? We're talking two different
things here; I'm not referncing any "victim" of the outta-control
fickle tabloid media. Hell if she's innocent, I wish her luck
and if she wins the gold, you'll see the $$$$ come around. The
media will do a complete 360 in a NooYawk minute.
I don't want to hear no Alan Aldaesque/Marjorie Clapprood
weeping for po' Tonya. Ya know like she is a victim of her
upbringing so she ran with the wrong crowd etc. and look what
harm they done her. Boohoo. That's what I find deesgustin'.
MikeL
|
155.164 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Jan 14 1994 16:21 | 29 |
|
Legal recourse? She might, but realistically I doubt it'd come to
anything. Implicating someone in such wrongdoing if it isn't true could
be slander, but I guess you'd have to prove intent. These are factors
external to Harding's control and she could be damaged by them, and
that part is unfair. I see your points about factors within her
control, though. The group of "wackos" who may have destroyed her
life happens to include her husband, which I don't consider to be an
irrelevant point. A person has some responsibility for whom they
associate with, and it doesn't get much closer to home than that.
>> Not living up to a phony image is no more commendable than having such
>> a phony image bestowed upon you.
>
> That's one opinion. But it ain't mine.
If, for whatever reason, you believe that Kerrigan is putting on false
airs to promote this image, then I see your point. I'm talking merely
about being "guilty" of a media image dropped on you simply based on
such things as one's looks, etc. Why rail against something that the
person has no control over? Likewise, on the other side, I don't have
much respect for someone if they're rebelling against conformity by
adopting an equally conformist and superficial "bad boy/girl" image and
behaving disrepectfully just to attract attention (like self-promoting
idiots in other sports like Brian Bosworth, Jim McMahon, Andre Agassi,
etc.). It's all the same to me; phony is phony...
glenn
|
155.165 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Fri Jan 14 1994 16:28 | 10 |
| She's a victim because, win or lose she's doomed, not because of her
upbringing. The damage has been done. The baseball bat story, her
comments after Kerrigan was "removed" from the competition have already
given people an opinion about her. It's an opinion that I don't think
she's capable of changing given her makeup.
Of course, I think it's still quite likely that Harding was in on this whole
thing, but that's beside the point.
Steve
|
155.166 | (8^0* | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jan 14 1994 16:36 | 9 |
| Just heard the TV movie thang on this is going to be haided into
production in a month or so, and Tonya Harding is gonna be played by
Nell Carter
JaKe
|
155.168 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jan 14 1994 17:03 | 23 |
| I read a few things in the paper that may shed some light on the motivation
for the crime. Evidently, from various estimates, the winner of the Gold
medal in figure skating stands to make about $10 million from endorsements,
appearances etc. Then ya have a couple of losers like Harding's ex-husband
and bodyguard drooling over this money. Harding tried to dump her ex a
couple of times and the bodyguard was unemployed until Harding received
a death threat.(it wouldn't surprise me if the bodyguard made the death
threat expecting to get hired). And guess what, after the attack,
Harding would have even more reason to keep a bodyguard and maybe even
give him a raise. I can see those 2 loser's dreaming up some
crazy scheme to insure they get a piece of the 10 mil. But I still can't
see a world class athlete athlete who has busted her butt training since
she was age 4, trying to knock off the competition in any other way than
out skating her.
Colorado has been a training ground for many world class skaters, especially
at the Broadmoor World Arena here in Colorado Springs. I number of people
have called the local radio talk shows and claim they know or have knowledge
about Harding. Evidently, the time she chased someone with a baseball bat
is not an isolated incident. There were stories of her getting into fist
fights with her coaches.
Keith
|
155.169 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jan 14 1994 17:08 | 11 |
| Just in, Nancy Kerrigan's part in the made for TV movie has been cast
now, also, playing her will be
Richard Simmons.
JaKe
|
155.170 | :^) | WREATH::SCOPA | | Fri Jan 14 1994 17:26 | 1 |
| Bring back Peggy Fleming.
|
155.171 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Fri Jan 14 1994 17:36 | 21 |
|
Ya gotta remember the background of most of these skaters compared to
Harding..Most of them come from upper-middle to rich backgrounds....Harding
used to live in a trailer home in her grandparents front yard and used to
collect cans off the side of the road to pay for her skating dresses...
Of course the skating establishment isn't going to like a rough and tumble kid
from across the tracks unless the kid is willing to put on airs in order to fit
in (like the waitress from the last olympics)...Harding wasn't willing to do
that..
However she is responsible for the company she keeps and if her image is
sullied because of her husband and bodyguard ..tough, that's life. I'm sure CBS
had an up close and personal segment discussing her background and what a
marvel is was for her to rise above it...it appears that story will have to go
on hold...
My guess is that she's disgusted by her husbands lack of faith in her and is
hoping he'll exonerate her from the whole mess.....
Metz
|
155.172 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jan 14 1994 17:42 | 10 |
| More on the TV movie casting
to play the bodyguard:
Emmanuel Lewis
JaKe
|
155.173 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 14 1994 19:09 | 16 |
| Metz,
I know that Harding has had a tough background and I do give her credit
for her constant attempts to rise above it. She doesn't fit the
stereotype of the well-off figure skater that the Olympic committee
supposedly fosters. However, Kerrigan comes from no easy background.
Her father has scraped and re-mortgaged to finance her efforts ( in
the past till the endorsements came in). Obviously she came from
a better background than Harding but she wasn't born with a silver
spoon in her mouth.
MikeL
|
155.174 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jan 14 1994 19:24 | 11 |
| Another cast member announced
To play Dick Buttons(even though he wasn't there, ya know, artistic
license) will be
Roseanne Arnold
JaKe
|
155.175 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Fri Jan 14 1994 22:24 | 3 |
| Jake.. your jokes are old and really not funny at all...
REK
|
155.176 | (8^0* | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Jan 14 1994 23:03 | 6 |
| REK DO ME!!!
BTW, you REK are old and not really funny at all.
JaKe
|
155.177 | Rat on, Tommy!! | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Fri Jan 14 1994 23:23 | 2 |
|
|
155.179 | (8^)* | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Sat Jan 15 1994 00:15 | 15 |
|
ANother casting anouncement, cast in the role of the blunt inanimate
cold object used to whack Kerrigan in the knee is
SPROTS own REK....
..how fitting.....
JaKe
|
155.180 | withdraw or you're gone... | SALEM::STIG | | Sat Jan 15 1994 06:45 | 5 |
| i heard on WEEI this morning that if Harding has anything to do with
this the Olympics committee is going to drop her from the team that is
if she doesn't withdraw.
stig
|
155.181 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Sat Jan 15 1994 23:29 | 11 |
| Jake Jake Jake.. Pittsburg.... Enought said.....
Lufy.... Leominster.... Enought said....
Get a life BOYS!!!!!!
REK
PS Lufy, nice reply.. first thing you have put it here in a while...
PSS Jake, don't give up the day job.. Your family would starve if you
trid to make a living as a comic.... :-}
|
155.182 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Sun Jan 16 1994 01:06 | 5 |
| re: JaKe - or as a casting agent. heck JaKe would probably fail
at the casting couch as well.
The Crazy Met
|
155.183 | (8^0* | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Sun Jan 16 1994 10:44 | 5 |
| Thanks fer the votes of confidence...I'll just consider the sources.
JaKe
|
155.184 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Jan 17 1994 08:10 | 4 |
| Too late now, but 60 Minutes had a segment last night about
Tonya Harding. Showed her skating when she was much younger.
Scott
|
155.185 | | GWEN::ASHE | No one here 'cept us chickens... | Mon Jan 17 1994 09:32 | 4 |
| Yeah, talked about how much of a bitch her mom is...
I heard they're casting Amy Fisher as Tonya Harding.
|
155.186 | Fitting | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | ChildsIsWrong-ReevesIsGOD! | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:00 | 4 |
| I was thinking the same thing, Walt.
Spud
|
155.187 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:14 | 16 |
| � If damaging she has legal recourse no??
Ah yes, the American solution -- take it to Judge Wapner. Only problem
is the courts can't give you an Olympic medal. Money can't buy
everything (it didn't get ND a football champeenship this year).
� I don't want to hear no Alan Aldaesque/Marjorie Clapprood
� weeping for po' Tonya. Ya know like she is a victim of her
� upbringing so she ran with the wrong crowd etc. and look what
� harm they done her.
Isn't this whole thing allegedly masterminded by her EX-husband? Seems
she was making a break from that bad crowd. I guess you have to live
with your mistakes for the rest of your life. What letter(s) can we
have Tonya walking around with for the rest of her life? How about SM
for stupid marriage?
|
155.188 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:41 | 6 |
| Well, if Gilooly mastermined this thing, what's Tonya doing
riding around with the fella? The TV shot the other day showed
the two of them driving outa their driveway in a Lincoln, I
believe.
Scott
|
155.189 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:45 | 12 |
|
> Well, if Gilooly mastermined this thing, what's Tonya doing
> riding around with the fella? The TV shot the other day showed
> the two of them driving outa their driveway in a Lincoln, I
> believe.
In spite of Mac's heartfelt defense and the general weeping going on in
here, while not legally married the two have been back together for a
few years now. Same thing as marriage as pertains to this case...
glenn
|
155.190 | theres still hope for her if she wasn't involved | SALEM::STIG | | Tue Jan 18 1994 12:30 | 6 |
| if she knows whats good for her she would leave goolooloo right now!!
Unless, she has something to do with this thing. Thats the only thing I
can think of if shes still with him...and..if she leaves him and shes
not guilty it could possibly save her career...
stig
|
155.191 | The misuse of money may kill her | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 18 1994 16:51 | 5 |
| The news that money from Olympics and other Amateur sources has gone to
pay for the hit has to be seriously damaging to her chances and may
allow finally the Olympic group to deep six her (If for no other reason
than that money is for Tonya's training expenses and misuse may be
grounds for dismissmal).
|
155.192 | re: .191 - not that simple | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 18 1994 16:54 | 10 |
|
US Figure Skating Association can recommend that Harding not be on the team.
Harding can then appeal to the USOC and maybe then to the IOC.
After that she can sue in court. By the time all that is done, the Olympics
may well be over. So if she gets a temporary injunction from a judge she
could very well go.
This is assuming she is not indicted for anything.
The Crazy Met
|
155.193 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:38 | 10 |
| Tcm,
My point was that USOC may not be able to touch her for anything
related to the hit and the FBI/Police felony charges but may be able to
make a move because of the misuse of funds, never even mentioning the
assault.
Sort of like sending Al Capone to sing-sing for Income Tax fraud
when criminal charges were not provable.
I saw something in glob about usoc having hands tied re. the actual
crime.
|
155.194 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:45 | 4 |
| but proving misuse of funds can be really tough especially if she made made
or was given money outside of what the USOC gave her.
The Crazy Met
|
155.195 | the clintons... | SALEM::STIG | | Wed Jan 19 1994 06:47 | 3 |
| wow!!! this sounds like Whitewater...
stig
|
155.196 | Act III, Scene V | KALI::MORGAN | | Wed Jan 19 1994 08:29 | 5 |
| Heard on the radio that Harding has distanced herself from Giloolly.
They're no longer living together, but she still doesn't believe he had
anything to do with it.
Steve
|
155.197 | she dumps goolooloo???maybe??? | SALEM::STIG | | Wed Jan 19 1994 09:01 | 4 |
| yup...she says she wants to concentrate on her skating rather than
goolooloo. This is the best thing that she can do for herself.
stig
|
155.198 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Wed Jan 19 1994 09:14 | 7 |
| On the slide, uh, er, drive in this morning the person inside
the radio 8-)> said that TH talked to the FBI for 10 hours
yesterday.
I wonder if that cut into her training?
Scott
|
155.199 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 10:33 | 3 |
| 10 hours! sheesh! what the heck could take that long.
The Crazy Met
|
155.200 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready,Steady,Go! | Wed Jan 19 1994 11:43 | 8 |
| Hmm... After talking for 10 hours to the police Tonya decides to
break all ties with her ex, again. My guess is if the cops ever pin
anything on her we'll be subjected to another battered spouse defense.
Watching Harding stand there silent while her lawyer answers questions
from the press reminds me of the classic gangster/mouthpiece scenes
from mob trials past.
/Don
|
155.201 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 12:40 | 4 |
| /er lots of folks let their lawyers do the talking in thes highly publicized
cases.
The Crazy Met
|
155.202 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 19 1994 13:45 | 2 |
| Given that what you say can be used against you in a court of law, I
can see why they do.
|
155.203 | TV movies gonna make a mint | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Jan 19 1994 14:05 | 6 |
| Authorities just issued a warrant for Gillooly's arrest.
4 down, 1 to go??
MikeL
|
155.204 | theres always something... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Wed Jan 19 1994 14:41 | 6 |
| you think harding snitched on him....she must of told the story and
nuthing but the story. your right its gonna make a great movie. they'll
all be running to the bank except those who will be running to the
slameroo...
stig
|
155.205 | quite the law, eh? | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:44 | 10 |
| Now I know why they waited until they got all the info before they even talked
to Gilhooley. There is a law in Oregon that says if you bring somebody in for
questioning and he invokes the right to stay silent the only way to get them
to testify is to give them immunity...
So instead they got all the info from everybody else and issued a warrent for
gilleygully to make sure that he couldn't get immunity....
Metz
|
155.206 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:48 | 6 |
| Metz,
That Oregon law is called the 5th amendment. It applies in every part of
the US.
The Crazy Met
|
155.207 | or maybe liter? | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:49 | 4 |
| It used to be the 5th Amendment. Now, since our metric infusion, it's
called the 750ml Amendment.
TTom
|
155.208 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:50 | 3 |
| I think you're confused, TCM. The 5th amendment doesn't guarantee that
what you say can get you off, even if you were a party to the crime.
The 5th amendment says you have the right to keep your mouth shut.
|
155.209 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 15:55 | 9 |
| Mac, from note .205
> There is a law in Oregon that says if you bring somebody in for
> questioning and he invokes the right to stay silent the only way to get them
> to testify is to give them immunity...
All this law says is that you can keep your mouth shut.
Reading comprehension 101 would help, Mac.
|
155.210 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:00 | 9 |
|
No, it's a state law that guarentees immunity if you are required to testify
Perhaps you should take the reading comprehension course TCM.
When I wrote state law I meant state law. When I wrote guarenteed immunity I
meant guarenteed immunity.
Metz
|
155.211 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:02 | 8 |
| Metz, I believe you it is an Oregon law. But ...
When congress wants someone to testify they HAVE to grant them immunity.
That means that a federal law is involved. No state can force a person to
testify if it will incriminate them. I just don't see where the Oregon law
is different than this.
The Crazy Met
|
155.212 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:07 | 5 |
| �All this law says is that you can keep your mouth shut.
�Reading comprehension 101 would help, Mac.
I comprehend fine, TCM. The law goes beyond the 5th amendment when it
promises immunity.
|
155.213 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:10 | 10 |
|
the AP reported it as a quirk in Oregon state law.
"Officials are hesitant to question him because of a twist in Oregon law. Under
state law a person can invoke his right of silence and, if compelled to give
testimony in a grand jury proceeding, or other investigatory proceeding can
receive immunity"
"We don't want to take that chance of him getting immunity,"Bradley said.
|
155.214 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Jan 19 1994 16:10 | 4 |
| Actually all it does is offer a legal way for the state to compel you
to testify.
The Crazy Met
|
155.215 | New levels of ridiculousness are being reached | KALI::MORGAN | | Fri Jan 21 1994 08:39 | 11 |
| You know what pisses me off about this? I was watching the local news
last night and they're interviewing Ted Kennedy. He had spoken to Mrs.
Kerrigan and she, of course, made it known how much she wanted the
perpertrator(s) arrested. So Ted says he made a call to a "high
ranking" FBI official. Next thing you know the Director of the FBI
made a personal call to Mrs. Kerrigan, assuring her they were doing all
they could. Now, is this an absolute joke or what? The girl got
wacked on the leg with a baton! It wasn't a gangland style murder or
anything.
Steve
|
155.216 | interview??? | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:00 | 9 |
| yeah but they were were thinking murder in the plot. it could of been.
these guys are little nutty to even do what they did...
ps. did anyone see the interview with i think (diane saywer) and the
bodyguard last night??? he was telling pretty much everything...
stig
|
155.217 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:11 | 3 |
|
HEad of the FBI ? Give me a F(*&^% break. Old Gin face has to get his
licks in too, when will he go away ?
|
155.218 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:14 | 14 |
| FBI announced that no Federal charges will be filed.
fwiw the bodyguard's statements are not enough to indict Harding. There
has to be independent corroboration for his accusations.
Grand jury met yesterday. DA announced that no indictments would be
handed down until next week.
If Harding is indicted the USOC has some chance of keeping her off the
team. Legally they will have a battle unless she is convicted and that
won't happen before the Olympics.
The Crazy met
|
155.219 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:27 | 2 |
|
I wonder how much this is costing the taxpayer ?
|
155.220 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 09:48 | 11 |
| > FBI announced that no Federal charges will be filed.
This is significant for Harding.
If it's only state charges, most states have laws against requiring
marital partners to testify against one another. (are they really
divorced? that could be significant too).
However, federal charges would recognize no such thing.
'Saw
|
155.221 | | GWEN::ASHE | Thank you Dr. King. | Fri Jan 21 1994 10:34 | 2 |
| Last I heard, they were divorced but living together again.
|
155.222 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Matthew 5:18 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:16 | 3 |
| Walt, she just kicked him out again this week for appearances sake.
Did I mention that the hitman is from Arizona?
|
155.223 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:33 | 6 |
| How come when the swimmer ,Kimball, got SMASHED and KILLED a couple
of people AND charged with V_H he was allowed to compete in the Olympic
trails and Harding (if charged) will not be allowed to compete?
REK
|
155.224 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 11:41 | 12 |
| re: .223
Excellent question! One difference of course is that Kimball was not
participating in the Olympics. Second difference he did not go out of
his way to injure a competitor. That aside he was not convicted and
therefore could particiapate. That is why I would bet that Harding will
probably be at the Olympics. If she is later convicted they could in
theory strip her medals and National championship (making Kwan a Nation
champ at 13!)
The Crazy Met
|
155.225 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:25 | 7 |
| So TCM, Its OK to run down and kill a couple of by-standers while drunk
out of him mind to compete in the Olympic trials but not OK to
"alledgely" hurt a competetor and be in the Olympics....
Does the Olympic Committee over see the trials?
REK
|
155.226 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:28 | 8 |
| REK
I did not say that. First I pointed out the differences. My conclusion
is that without a conviction keeping Harding, just liek stopping
Kimball from competing, is a very very tough call.
The Crazy Met
|
155.227 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:35 | 3 |
| Sorry TCM, I tend to not read all the way through...
REK
|
155.228 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:35 | 9 |
| What frosted me was while watching the end of Law and Order Wednesday
night, Channel 7 cut into the ending to show with a news preview of
Kerrigan getting out of her car. Cut back to the closing credits of
L&O.
I'm almost to the point where I hope she goes medal-less in the
Olympics just to shut the media up.
Mark.
|
155.229 | did they say if nancy was picking her nose??? | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:41 | 6 |
| what kind of pizza was she eating this time???
re a couple back...plus Harding would have some nice law suits in hand
if not indited and getting thrown off the team...
stiggy
|
155.230 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | Ready,Steady,Go! | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:50 | 6 |
| Not surprisingly folks are starting to hate Kerrigan for something
she has absolutely no control over. I figure that by the time the
Olympics start there will be a Tonya Harding cult, similar to the one
that wants to free Pam Smart.
/Don
|
155.231 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 12:53 | 24 |
| To me, all the hype and coverage is almost as annoying as the recent spate
of what I call "weather panic".
You know, when there's a winter storm three days off all the weatherpeople
start getting nervous. They send trailers across the screen that
say
Caution, there is a winter storm which might be big and might
be bad and there's a chance, kinda sorta that it might be headed
this way, and by the way, be sure to stay tuned to this station
for all your storm needs because our Doppler Radar is better than
anyone else's Doppler Radar even though it comes from the same
place, and our Anchorwoman's chest looks better in a tight
sweater than their anchorwoman does, in case you needed to know
this.
I mean, I'm fed up with all of it.
We're not going to medal at all in the Limp-Ics, and then we're gonna
hear about it all the way to 1998.....
sigh,
'Saw
|
155.232 | it really stinks... | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:00 | 28 |
| She seemed pretty bent on what is "owed to her". She was focused on
one thing, how much money she is owed.
"...People work and get a pay check every week, I work hard a expect a
paycheck at the end...".
I hope she alienates all potential advertisers and endorsements with
her classless response to this nastiness, regardless of her guilt to
the action. A no class, skater who clearly sees only herself, not one
word of sorrow (even a fake attempt) to Kerrigan, only herself.
Not only is she one of the most unattractive and disproportioned skater,
she is a whiner. (I think she has a terrible bod, for a figure skater)
A spokesperson from the US Olympic did state that making the team is
a **privilege**, and is not owed to anyone. She also stated that a
person can be denied acceptance on the team is it is felt they do not
represent the nation as per some definition set forth by the
committee...
The body guard is also a fraud, and liar... I do believe that Harding
was an active participant of the "plan". I use her actions, her mood,
and her reactions as a basis for my opinion.
Should make about seven made-fer-tee-vee movies.
_GSH_
|
155.233 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:03 | 23 |
| > I hope she alienates all potential advertisers and endorsements with
> her classless response to this nastiness, regardless of her guilt to
> the action. A no class, skater who clearly sees only herself, not one
> word of sorrow (even a fake attempt) to Kerrigan, only herself.
On Imus this morning they had me rolling. They said that while all
potential advertisers are heading for the hills where she is concerned
she has just garnered a fat contract being a celebrity spokesperson
for The Club....
> The body guard is also a fraud, and liar... I do believe that Harding
> was an active participant of the "plan". I use her actions, her mood,
> and her reactions as a basis for my opinion.
He's living proof that someone, somewhere, was in the barn and wasn't
just feeding the cows....
> Should make about seven made-fer-tee-vee movies.
Yeah....8^)
|
155.234 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:04 | 8 |
| Globe had a blurb that Kerrigan called in to a cable TV talk show (some
local Sports call in show) one night. The anchors were kind of stunned
even after they verified it wasn't a hoax. The delicious part is that
all those media folks were camped outside her home in the freezing cold
while this was taking place.
The Crazy Met
|
155.235 | I mean 'cow' statement, o' course | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:04 | 4 |
| Damn you, 'Saw, I just spit coffee out my nose all over everything with
that darned "caw" statement! ;-)
_GSH_
|
155.236 | | LAGUNA::MAY_BR | JWBobbit&DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShort | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:09 | 7 |
| > she has just garnered a fat contract being a celebrity spokespersonfor
> The Club....
Dammit. That's the second tie I've seen someone steal the line I put
in here about a week ago.
brews
|
155.237 | No money, no compete | PIPE::DODGE | | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:43 | 18 |
| It looks like the U.S. Figure Skating whatever will let Tonya be named
to the Olympic Team. I doubt the US Olympic organization will stop her
either. The reason is the threat of a law suit.
I read an article somewhere about some Men's track star who was denied
a slot on the team for some reason. He sued, and three years later won
a judgement for $75M.
If I were on the board I would let her compete, but not provide any
funding, no expenses, nothing ! I imagine it is very expensive to
train, travel all over, buy meals, etc. If the Olympic committee
and all her sponsors (who could they be ?) cut off the money.....
she is S.O.L.
Either way she is a loser and will never make any endorsement money.
She will fade into the woodwork very fast. Her only possible source
of money is Hollywood.
|
155.238 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 13:54 | 9 |
| 1. Butch Reynlods won a 27M award against the IAAF
2. If Harding is on the Olympic team
A. The charter likely forbids different treatment for one athelete
B. Even if A is not true, treatment like .237 suggest would probably
lead to a law suit.
The Crazy Met
|
155.239 | lawsuit alert | HBAHBA::HAAS | Party when you can, rock til you drop | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:02 | 17 |
| > A. The charter likely forbids different treatment for one athelete
Not true, due mainly to the fack that each sport has its own way of
choosing its team. Some directly compete in a championship, like figure
skating did. Some have elimination trials. Some are appointed.
And each has its own ways of dealing with adding and subtracting team
members.
> 1. Butch Reynlods won a 27M award against the IAAF
This is where the real rub will happen. If'n they kick Harding off the
team afore she's found guilty of anything, then she'll be pretty much set
for life after the lawsuit.
TTom
|
155.240 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:14 | 6 |
| One thing I've heard a couple of folks say on WFAN is that the USOC usually
defers to the US Figure Skating Association when it comes to the skaters,
so they will probably do that in this instance....
'sAw
|
155.241 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:16 | 8 |
| Ttom,
what I meant was once an athelete is on the team (after Jan 31) and the
USOC is completely in charge treating atheletes differently in terms of
expenses, etc. may be against the charter.
The Crazy met
|
155.242 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:16 | 5 |
| � Not only is she one of the most unattractive and disproportioned skater,
� she is a whiner. (I think she has a terrible bod, for a figure skater)
I didn't realize this was part of the judging criteria. Is Burt Parks
one of the US judges this year?
|
155.243 | Fack is... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:22 | 11 |
| |� Not only is she one of the most unattractive and disproportioned skater,
|� she is a whiner. (I think she has a terrible bod, for a figure skater)
|
| I didn't realize this was part of the judging criteria. Is Burt Parks
| one of the US judges this year?
Bulltooties if it's not! One of the main judging criteria is appearance.
Judges call it "grace" or "elegance", but lets face, to win a woman HAS to
be a babe...
=bob=
|
155.244 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:27 | 9 |
| Guaranteed that if she weighs 400 pounds with pus-laden zits oozing all over
her greasy countenance, it don't matter if she can do a quadruple axel
followed by a flying camel, 1� gainer sitz-spin. She won't make the
team.
No doubt about it....
'Saw
|
155.245 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:29 | 6 |
| |Guaranteed that if she weighs 400 pounds with pus-laden zits oozing all over
|her greasy countenance, it don't matter if she can do a quadruple axel
|followed by a flying camel, 1� gainer sitz-spin. She won't make the
|team.
Yabut she could sell for Digital (a la MrT).
|
155.246 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:32 | 17 |
| >|Guaranteed that if she weighs 400 pounds with pus-laden zits oozing all over
>|her greasy countenance, it don't matter if she can do a quadruple axel
>|followed by a flying camel, 1� gainer sitz-spin. She won't make the
>|team.
>
>Yabut she could sell for Digital (a la MrT).
Hahahahaha.... I'm rolling.
Yeah, I've seen a few like that, believe me....
I wonder what MrT would have to say about all this.....
'Saw
|
155.247 | 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:37 | 7 |
| Oh MrT would rally to Tonya..
somehow he'd make the connection to Bob Knight and his beloved
Hoosiers; unatractive, hardworking misunderstand, overachieving etc..
MikeL
|
155.249 | now that's a shocking revelation | FRETZ::HEISER | Matthew 5:18 | Fri Jan 21 1994 14:39 | 1 |
| > Sorry TCM, I tend to not read all the way through...
|
155.250 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:12 | 18 |
|
>|Guaranteed that if she weighs 400 pounds with pus-laden zits oozing all over
>|her greasy countenance, it don't matter if she can do a quadruple axel
>|followed by a flying camel, 1� gainer sitz-spin. She won't make the
>|team.
That's gotta be a candidate for Image of the Year Award.
Can you imagina a 400 pounder in one 'a them flying camels, spinning at
a hunnerd miles an hour, sraying the front 5 rows with oozing puss?
We'd start seeing everybody wearing big ol' plastic bags, kinda
like what they put on when Gallagher goes into his Sledge-O-Matic
routine.
Yuck!
|
155.251 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:33 | 26 |
| RE: .242 Oh-oh, PC police on the move... ;-)
O.K., let me rephrase so's to soothe any sensitive readers.
As an Olympian:
She is a good figure skater. Period. She has been mediocre and she's
been great. She (or Kerrigan) are certainly not "locks" for a gold.
As a spokesperson for BRAND X:
In terms of advertising endorsements, I feel she is a whiner and has
nothing, regardless of her triumphs on the ice, coming to her in terms
of big bucks. I feel she has acted self centered and insensitive to
the whole Kerrigan affair. Now, with her hubby (she said a week ago
the divorce should have never happened) costing her millions, I see
no indignation, no anger, certainly no offer of sympathy and condolence
toward Kerrigan. A classless bimbette who thinks she's entitled to a
check.
AFTER HER PRIME:
As far as her looks figure in, I wouldn't go watch an ugly ice capade
queen. Peggy Flemming, et al, were never homely... Go "figure".
_GSH_
|
155.252 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:45 | 7 |
| > The runner-up in the Kerrigan-less US championships was the 14 year old
> Kwan girl. She's a little pixie. If we're to go by what you and Saw say
> then some of the judges must be pedophiles.
Take a look at Dick Button and tell me that there aren't alot of
weirdos in the world of figure skating.....
|
155.253 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:47 | 23 |
| > That's gotta be a candidate for Image of the Year Award.
>
>Can you imagina a 400 pounder in one 'a them flying camels, spinning at
>a hunnerd miles an hour, sraying the front 5 rows with oozing puss?
>
> We'd start seeing everybody wearing big ol' plastic bags, kinda
>like what they put on when Gallagher goes into his Sledge-O-Matic
>routine.
Oh man, thank god I wasn't eating a cheeseburger when I read this.
This is TOO funny.
On a serious note, my 7th grade math teachers face was so bad that
when he'd smile they'd pop and coat the bottom edge of his glasses.
I lost weight in 7th grade because that class was right before lunch
and I could never eat.
Plus, he was a Browns fan.....
'Saw
|
155.254 | | GWEN::ASHE | Thank you Dr. King. | Fri Jan 21 1994 15:53 | 2 |
| Weirdos: See Boitano, Brian.
|
155.255 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:00 | 6 |
| >
> Weirdos: See Boitano, Brian.
>
Or Scott "Gonna Fly Now" Hamilton....
|
155.257 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 21 1994 16:17 | 23 |
| > The biggest weirdo is that Bowman the Showman. He looked like
> he was on the verge of a nervous breakdown.
Who is Bowman the Showman?
>As for Dick Button,
> what qualifies him as a "weirdo"? That he gets overly excited
> about his favorite sport? Lot of weirdos in here then. Maybe,
> it's that he sounds a tad effeminate? Let go of your hangups,
> Beavis. Figure skating doesn't have the market cornered on
> strange characters. Ask Lance Rentzel. Or "Mad Dog" Ernie Holmes.
I dunno, he's just weird. He's got a weird look in his eyes that
scares me. And now with the beard, I don't know....
I never said figure skating had the market cornered on weirdos,
although I find it a little weird that someone would choose it
over hockey, but there are some weird ones there.....
'Saw
|
155.258 | people who have a favorite solstice? | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 21 1994 17:09 | 3 |
| �Lot of weirdos in here then.
No arguments from me on this one.
|
155.259 | rugby players? :*) | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Jan 21 1994 17:23 | 1 |
|
|
155.260 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Jan 24 1994 08:49 | 5 |
| Report on Imus this morning is that Portland, Ore. authorities say they
have enough to charge Tonya Harding. They are waiting till they get it
air-tight however....
'Saw
|
155.261 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Wed Jan 26 1994 17:54 | 2 |
| Why are they having the Winter Olympics so soon? Shouldn't they be in
1996? Is it not every 4 years anymore?
|
155.262 | | DECWET::METZGER | Super Human? No, Super Sonic.... | Wed Jan 26 1994 17:56 | 7 |
|
they decided to stagger them so that summer and winter wouldn't be in the same
year....so they went 2 years inbetween last winter and this one...
Metz
|
155.263 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Sit down, you're rockin' the boat | Thu Jan 27 1994 08:59 | 4 |
| Right - next summer in '96, next winter after this on is '98.
A radio station in SD wants to change where they are from Harding
County to... well, you can figure out the rest...
|
155.264 | Anyone hear it??? | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Fri Jan 28 1994 07:26 | 4 |
| what did everyone think of tonya's state of the union address
yesterday???
stig
|
155.265 | does anybody take this s*ag seriously? | AD::HEATH | Have pitchers and catchers reported yet? | Fri Jan 28 1994 07:39 | 4 |
|
she is still lying
|
155.266 | Hey - Don't blame me! | SUBPAC::WHITEHAIR | BILL MUST GO! | Fri Jan 28 1994 07:51 | 23 |
|
I really feel sorry for this girl. Here she has worked since being
3 years old to get to this point. Has been beaten by her mother
for not doing good enough. Got mixed up with this bum and now is
being considered guilty before all the facts are in. I really
hopes she goes to the big event and wins the gold over Nance. She
will probably not get many endorcements but at least she will have
had her chance.
Now, Nance on the other hand is this woman who's parents have lots
of money and she is making lots more for what? She hasn't won
anything yet but still get all these endorcements. Go figure.
I guess this case goes right along with all the others that have
gone backwards.....ie: Bobbitt...how can this woman get away with
what she did. Do you think it have given anyone ideas? Then there
is the Jackson deal. You have enough money, do what you want. Now
there are the two boys who kill their parents and say they did it
because they were abused.
The list can go on and on.....
hw
|
155.267 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Mark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces. | Fri Jan 28 1994 07:54 | 9 |
|
Anyone notice Bernie looks like Nancy with short hair?
Chappy
|
155.268 | I don't understand... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:01 | 4 |
| She just made the situation worse. How the heck can her lawyers allow
her to talk like that...
stig
|
155.269 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:22 | 22 |
|
NK's parents did not have alot of money until NK started to ring in
endorsements. She has since started to 'spread the wealth'. In speaking
with some of the pro shop guys at the local rinks where she used to
train, it was stated to me that NK's parents bet the fort on her career
and it is paying off. Remember at the last Olympics ? Who won the gold ?
It wasn't NK, but a Japanese American named Yamaguchi who got squat for
endorsments and most people think that NK won it that year. To bad for
Yamaguchi, but NK had her teeth fixed and now she is cashing in.
Nothing wrong with that, I hope she makes millions. NK is no shoo in
for the gold, as Harding is the better skater before this mess began. I
personally hope that she is innocent (TH) and stomps on NK in the
'pics. (I doubt Tonya is as pure as snow white, but this is a friggin
mess and it will detract from other events that I would like to see)
Besides, Imus had it right when he called NK handsome.
I sure hope the FBI devotes mega manpower to crack this here case. It
would be a shame if TH gets away with it, but if the Feds want you,
they will have you.
|
155.270 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:24 | 14 |
| > <<< Note 155.268 by SALEM::STIG "for all have sinned" >>>
> -< I don't understand... >-
>
> She just made the situation worse. How the heck can her lawyers allow
> her to talk like that...
>
> stig
Apparently she made similar comments to the FBI when she spoke with
them about 9 days ago (several days after the event). It appears that
if she did nothing to plan or cover up the event, and did come forth
with what she knew afterwards (even though delayed), that she has done
nothing illegal. Now whether or not she had nothing to do with it is
something I care not to speculate about.
|
155.271 | This weather sips | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:27 | 17 |
| I knew I shouldn't have started readign Hal's notes again.
Kerrigan comes from a blue collar background, same as Harding. Kerrigan's
parents had their act together enough to support her in her quest for greatness.
Harding overcame her parents (or actually mother) in hers. Don't hold it
against Kerrigan that she came form a positive family background.
From what I could see, both made extraordinay sacrifice to get where they are,
and both have dedicated their lives to it.
I dunno what to believe. Harding seeme straight up when she said that she was
wrong nto to report the incident, but then she planted "friends" to make excuses
for her that she feared abuse if she did. I can't help but get the gut feeling
that she is playing to the sympathies of the People-Magazine/Made-For-TV_Movie
crowd in the hopes of still coming through the thing smelling like a rose.
=Bob=
|
155.272 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:28 | 5 |
|
Besides, if they had some real evidence she would have been cuffed by
now. They are making it airtight so the USFSA doesn't get it's ass
sued. This is getting good. What happeneds if TH is exonerated ?
|
155.273 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:48 | 18 |
| > What happeneds if TH is exonerated ?
If she is not allowed to go to the Olympics and that happens the USOC will
be paying her millions.
Donna DeVerona (sp?) of ABC said that with the due process requirements that
the Skating Federation and the USOC have it would be very difficult to
have a hearing and resolve the issue before the Olympics.
Gilooly spent 11 hours with the DA and FBI yesterday. If they still haven't
cut him a deal then he must not be able to give them enough on Harding; if
that is the case and she really only knew about the plot after the fact
she should be alloed to go to the Olympics.
Kerrigan could really become the media darling by asking the USOC to allow
Harding to compete - imagine the tons of money that would bring.
The Crazy Met
|
155.274 | I no longer have faith in our justice system | FRETZ::HEISER | my kid beat up your honor student | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:52 | 2 |
| There is no justice today. There are only lawyers who are better
salespersons than others. Look at the current Mike Tyson proposal.
|
155.275 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:55 | 21 |
| The sad part is that this has overshadowed almost every other
aspect of the Olympics. The bobsled team has been doing really
well, our hockey team has been working their asses off (down
in Middletown CT, btw) and I'm sure there are some real
competitors out there who have been all but forgotten because
of this.
(And it's not like the Olympics is going to be any great rating
grabber either).
Now, wouldn't it make you all have thigh shuddering pleasure if
it came out that CBS pulled an NBC Dateline, and paid Gilloooooly
et al to do this, in an effort to get a ton of media attention
focused on this?
(What do you think /Don? Is it possible?)
I'd have to get a BIG roll of Bounty if that was the case....
'Saw
|
155.276 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:00 | 9 |
| What is the laste Tyson proposal?
back to the Olympics: Especially if Harding does go and she and Kerrigan
are competing for the Gold in the free skate CBS may very well get the
highest rating for a Winter Olympic ever! One exception may be the tape
of the US win over the Soviets in 1980 - this competition will also
be taped. Imagine the ratings if it was live in the US in prime time!
The Crazy Met
|
155.278 | Rathole 101 | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:19 | 19 |
|
Justice ? Ptooie. Off the subject a little, F*&^ the court system, it's
worthless. Laywers, sure they share some of the blame, but the whole
thing rots. The reason the did this crime is because they felt they
could get away with it and make some cash. Thats the problem, GET AWAY
WITH IT. Not me, I'm not responsable. It was my youth, I was abused, A
little rabbit told me to kill, WTF I had my truck stolen last year and
they caught the little punks from Southie that did it. Some real nice
white trash, that didn't deserve to be locked up, they deserved an old
fashioned beating. I mean they were caught for cripes sake and let go.
No restitution, no nothing, I even testified twice. I pity the fool who
thinks he can cause property damage to me again and gets caught. Faith,
nope, justice, even worse. You want something done, do it yourself.
Sad thing is until restitution is made and jail time served as a result
of your actions, forget it. It's a nice circle jerk that manifests
itself.
|
155.279 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:25 | 3 |
| What I find really scary are the comments to the effect that since
Harding is not considered visually pleasing she must be guilty. One of
the Boston DJs is spewing stuff like this.
|
155.280 | | FRETZ::HEISER | my kid beat up your honor student | Fri Jan 28 1994 10:37 | 12 |
| Re: Tyson
Yeah Don King must need the spending money. He wants Mike out fighting
again.
Re: Tonya
She is a 2-bagger, but I've sensed she was involved from the start.
You just get a gut-feeling about certain things. Sometimes those
gut-feelings betray you, most of the time they don't. I'd be shocked
if she truly wasn't involved. And her statement to the press yesterday
seemed to do more damage than good.
|
155.282 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 28 1994 11:01 | 3 |
| I don't think Tonya's that bad... Certainly better than Hillary.
=Bob=
|
155.283 | Harding's a VERY powerful skater/gymnast. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Fri Jan 28 1994 11:18 | 4 |
| Agreed =Bob=. Compared to Hillary, Tonya looks like Vanna White.
- ACC Chris
|
155.284 | Vanna White -yeccchhhhh!!! | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Jan 28 1994 11:33 | 0 |
155.285 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jan 28 1994 11:58 | 19 |
| > Justice ? Ptooie. Off the subject a little, F*&^ the court system, it's
> worthless. Laywers, sure they share some of the blame, but the whole
> thing rots. The reason the did this crime is because they felt they
> could get away with it and make some cash. Thats the problem, GET AWAY
> WITH IT.
Truer words were never spoken. Recently, I just went through a 2 1/2 year
ordeal of a police investigation and court appearances for a couple of
dirt bags who robbed us. You won't believe the scumbags that are turned
loose by out Legal system(note: I did not say justice system). After it was
all over, the detective told us about a punk he arrested for 26 burglaries
worth about $90,000. After he got a 13 year sentence, the detective
interviewed him and he was devastated. He told the detective that he was
caught 5 times for burglary as a juvenile and was let go every time. He
said he didn't think anything would be done if he was caught.
Yep, the message that the legal system sends out is that crime pays.
Keith
|
155.286 | They'll be rolling in $$ from TV/book/movies etc | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:22 | 5 |
| Bottom line to all this hooey; it's all being set up, she don't
go, she sue.. it's the American way.
MikeL
|
155.287 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Fri Jan 28 1994 12:39 | 6 |
| Hey WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hillary-Babe pust both of those skaters
on thin ice when it comes to a beauty contest!!!!
REK
PS TH mom really helped TH cause lasted night with Connie Chung....
|
155.288 | Hilary = 1lb of spam | KIRKTN::DWALLACE | The Lure 'O the trout | Fri Jan 28 1994 13:01 | 1 |
|
|
155.289 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 28 1994 13:06 | 2 |
|
Besides, I like TH's initials.8*)
|
155.290 | REK's excuse: the dog made me do it :-) | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Fri Jan 28 1994 13:39 | 3 |
| what did TH's mom say to Connie Chung?
The Crazy Met
|
155.291 | SPENT,SPENT,SPENT..... | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Jan 28 1994 14:22 | 5 |
| REK, I'm *really* starting to worry about you....
Have you had your eyes examined recently?
'Saw
|
155.292 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Jan 28 1994 14:28 | 5 |
|
Hillary a babe ? WOuldn't take her to a rock fight. Bleeechhh.
Any chance on team USA medaling in Hockey ?
|
155.293 | | SALEM::DODA | Stand and deliver | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:11 | 9 |
| <<< Note 155.287 by USCTR1::KING "Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones..." >>>
> Hey WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hillary-Babe pust both of those skaters
> on thin ice when it comes to a beauty contest!!!!
Not really, she just appears to be attractive when she parks
her butt between Shalala and Reno.
daryll
|
155.294 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:31 | 7 |
|
I think the USA hockey team has a decent chance at medaling. Would
have been a lot better if two players had not decided to stay with NHL
contracts instead...
Marc
|
155.295 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | prisoners here of our own device | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:56 | 8 |
|
>> Yep, the message that the legal system sends out is that crime pays.
Damned right crime pays, look at what we pay
Congressmen/Senators/politicians!!!
JaKe
|
155.296 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | prisoners here of our own device | Fri Jan 28 1994 15:56 | 9 |
|
>>REK, I'm *really* starting to worry about you....
>>Have you had your eyes examined recently?
Saw, methinks he needs his HEAD examined more than his eyes.....
JaKe
|
155.297 | hohohohoho.... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Sat Jan 29 1994 05:59 | 3 |
| or maybe REK is getting old and seeenile...
stig
|
155.298 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Mon Jan 31 1994 15:50 | 11 |
| It seems Mr. Gilooly is pleading guilty to some
sort of racketeering charge in return for a lighter
sentence. These guys are singin' their li'l heads off, huh?
Also, a desk clerk in Detriot(TM) is claiming that TH
asked for (and received) NK's hotel room number before
the assault.
It's intrusive and tawdry.
It's fun.
dr.a
|
155.299 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Tue Feb 01 1994 15:50 | 4 |
| Gillooly was supposed to have a news conference at 2:30 EST. Any word
on what was said?
The Crazy Met
|
155.300 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 01 1994 15:58 | 13 |
| >Gillooly was supposed to have a news conference at 2:30 EST. Any word
>on what was said?
You gonna eat that?
Oops, wrong joke....
8^)
|
155.301 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Thurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!! | Tue Feb 01 1994 15:59 | 14 |
| Anybody see the tape fo the Austrian skier that was killed over the
weekend????
I just missed it but the paper here ran a few pics from the tape.
Seems she hit a timing device, lost her helmet, broke her neck and died
shortly after being airlifted off the course.
Other skiers were said to be blasting whoever was running the race,
saying they used chemicals on the course to keep the snow form emlting,
and it made the course extremely icy and dangerous. The skier, whose
name escapes me at this time, is survived by a 3 year old child.
JaKe
|
155.302 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | Thurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!! | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:00 | 10 |
|
>Gillooly was supposed to have a news conference at 2:30 EST. Any word
>on what was said?
He plea bargained, got 2 years in the slammer and a $100k fine, and
will testify against Harding. He implicated her when doing his thang
in front of the judge.
JaKe
|
155.303 | mo' input - mo' input | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:05 | 8 |
|
Yabbut doesn't Oregon law have some weird clause that doesn't
allow Gillooly to "implicate" her or some such twist?
deen to wonk (tm)
Kev
|
155.304 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:18 | 10 |
| he may have given enough evidence that the police can now independently
verify.
If .302 has it right, it would appear that
Kwan will be in the Olympics and Bobeck will go as the alternate.
And Harding should be sent away for stooopidity. The odds that she would not
have gotten at least 2nd place at the US Nationals, assuming she didn't
crash and burn, were incredibly small.
The Crazy Met
|
155.305 | I'll take this bastion until another comes along | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:26 | 10 |
| TCM,
Heard on Imus this morning that Nike has kicked in 25k to pay for
her defense
And Nancy K has signed with Reebok for an ad to be aired during
Olympics
Just as Budweiser puts in a lot of money defending young America's
right to swill (oops) drink beer we see other bastion's of freedom
defending Tonya's right to make money for advertisers
And isn't Imus doing a lot of repeats these days
|
155.306 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:27 | 5 |
| � Just as Budweiser puts in a lot of money defending young America's
� right to swill (oops) drink beer
I realize you're an old timer, but do you really consider >21 year olds
to be "Young America"?
|
155.307 | stick a fork in her | FRETZ::HEISER | gimme a dollar or gimme 50 cents | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:30 | 3 |
| His lawyer is fielding questions at the conference. Sounds like they
have lots of evidence, and even have her only 2 possible defenses taken
care of: home along excuse, and the abuse alibi.
|
155.308 | Usually, alas, in that order | AKOCOA::BREEN | A hot-rod Ford and a two dollar bill | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:36 | 11 |
| Mac,
I consider < 35 still prime of life.
And Bud etal know that oceans of their beer are consumed by < 21
35 is generally when the biggest decisions are made such as
What beer to stick with (and perhaps what gal too)
|
155.309 | I still say, let her compete... | KALI::MORGAN | | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:37 | 11 |
| Does anyone else think that the two (Harding and Gillooly) are up to it
again, by giving the cops just enough dirt for them to indict her, thus
opening the door for the USOC to boot her off the team? This would
allow them to sue the collective asses off the USOC ala Butch Reynolds.
Reynolds tested positive for something illegal, yet still won a $27
million lawsuit. She could stand to reap more money via a lawsuit, than
she would if she were to stay on the team.
Then lo and behold, the two would reconcile once again.
Steve
|
155.310 | bunch a idjuts... | DECWET::METZGER | 17 days... | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:42 | 9 |
|
I'm still amazed that this group of people with a collective IQ of about 12
thought that they could get away with this. I guess it's because their
collective IQ is 12 that they thought they could
The oregon law is that they need independent confirmation of anything that
conspirators say trying to implicate each other...
Metz
|
155.311 | The gang that couldn't shoot straight | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Tue Feb 01 1994 16:45 | 13 |
| The 25K that Nike was donating was on the news last night.
re .309: if she is eventually not convicted of anything then the USOC could
be in deep trouble if they kick her off the team. A problem with your
hypothesis is that it would take too much intelligence too cook this plot
up and so far these folks have rivaled Beavis & Butthead in sheer incompetence
and stupidity.
If she is not convicted (which she won't be by the Olympics) the USOC's best
bet is to let her compete and then strip any medals she might win if she
is convicted.
The Crazy Met
|
155.312 | | FRETZ::HEISER | gimme a dollar or gimme 50 cents | Tue Feb 01 1994 17:29 | 9 |
| > Reynolds tested positive for something illegal, yet still won a $27
> million lawsuit. She could stand to reap more money via a lawsuit, than
that's currently in the court of appeals, but he should still get a
major chunk of that $27M.
I can't believe they were dumb enough to attack Kerrigan at the rink.
Obviously, it takes someone with credentials to get down to the tunnel.
They could've hired some junkie to do it and blame it on Detroit crime.
|
155.313 | Reynolds a very different case | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Tue Feb 01 1994 17:36 | 7 |
| Reynolds claimed that the whole process leading to the test was so flawed
that there was no way to figure out if it was his sample that was tested
or someone elses. Most of the places he appealed to, before getting to
the IAAF, agreed with him. After the IAAF refused to let him back he
sued in the courts and they also agreed with him.
The Crazy Met
|
155.314 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Tue Feb 01 1994 18:44 | 6 |
| heerd that Gilooly's part in convicting TH will just be one piece of
the puzzle. Evidently they gots lots more dirt on TH linking her to
masterminding this thang than just ol Jeffy boy's testimony.
JaKe
|
155.315 | NikeNikeNikeNike..HAHAHAHAHA and I'm Ish Kabible | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Feb 01 1994 20:12 | 11 |
| Yup,
I really believed Nike's president when he said that in America
a person is innocent until proven guilty and he felt morally
bound to donate the caish to her defense. Yup.
And everytime someone mentions this mess, someone else will
mention how altruitic and morally superior those Nikeites are.
Yup.
MikeL
|
155.316 | Don't think they'll use this in the WWoS intro | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Tue Feb 01 1994 22:50 | 8 |
| re: the skiing mishap...
Save for perhaps Theisman's knee injury or Herb Score getting domed off
of McDougal's liner back to the mound, the most disturbing video
footage I've ever seen. A real tragedy as she left a 4 year old
daughter.
Mark.
|
155.317 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Wed Feb 02 1994 08:18 | 14 |
| If TH is officially charged with conspiracy and all that other stuff
then would she be allowed to leave the country after she makes bail?
I thought that part of the bail guidelines that you were not allowed to
leave the country....
The Skier that died. As a former Ski instructor, Ski Racer and ski
patrol I feel I can speak a little on this subject. The tape is not
clear enough for officials to see where she hit her head. The woman
downhillers have been complaining for years the the DH courses were
not tough enough or challenging. Infact, the women got the Olympic
downhill moved to the mens course. DH is a dangerous sport and the tape
we all saw shows why..
REK
|
155.318 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 08:39 | 18 |
| > If TH is officially charged with conspiracy and all that other stuff
> then would she be allowed to leave the country after she makes bail?
> I thought that part of the bail guidelines that you were not allowed to
> leave the country....
A lawyer in WFAN yesterday said that is pretty much up to the judge.
She's hardly a flight risk -- as Howie Rose said (was it Howie on with
Susan Waldman yesterday afternoon?) "what's she gonna do, seek asylum
in Lillehammer?"
It's possible that she could be allowed to leave the country and compete.
Lots was made of the fact that the onus is now squarely on the USOC to
make a decision, and in a sense they're damned if they do, damned if they
don't......
'Saw
|
155.319 | Slimball of the year award goes to... | AIMHI::KERR | Livin Life By The Drop | Wed Feb 02 1994 08:45 | 16 |
|
a few back.
I believe Nike is donating to her defense because they are out of
Beaverton, Oregon (next town over from Portland) and that it is at a
rink in Beaverton that TH did most of her early training. I think they
gave the money because of the local affliation, not because they were
trying to appear altruistic. Besides, someone's got to give her some
support, the desire to nail her is so great that I don't believe she
can get a fair shake (and, IMHO, Gilooloo is such a slimball that his
implicating her for a reduced sentence doesn't mean a whole lot).
By the way, I thought Gilooloo's lawyer was way out of line at that
press conference, he was acting like prosecutor, judge, jury, and the
USOC, what ever happened to due-process?
|
155.320 | didn't they have a sort of tournament then? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Feb 02 1994 08:46 | 17 |
|
Yabbut mark my word, this will be mentioned sometime during the
games!
Apparently in some small town about 60 miles from the 'Pic game
site, there really is some lady named Lilly Hammer. According to an
unnammed source (I know who but I won't say who), Lilly is planning on
hosting her own Lilly Hammer Olympics.
That's about it
I remain,
waiting for the Lilliputten games - I'll fit right in. Right Gulliver?
;^)
Kev
|
155.321 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Wed Feb 02 1994 09:26 | 14 |
|
Re the downhill tragedy.
Now that the courses are challenging enough a little twist is added and
that is a greater risk for injury/death. If in fact it was a problem
with the course then it should be dealt with. If not shut up or put up.
Being involved in racing it gives you a different outlook when
something like this happens, and 98% of the time it is due to
driver/racer error.
She knew the risks of the sport and payed the ultimate price, but all
competitors know this once they are on the starting grid.
|
155.322 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Feb 02 1994 09:28 | 8 |
| What Nike says publicly and what my interpretation of their real
intent are opposite polls. Nike did this for business reasons even
though it's only 25K which in itself is fine; don't add the
hypocrital moralistic hooey.
JMHO
MikeL
|
155.323 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 02 1994 10:06 | 6 |
| � By the way, I thought Gilooloo's lawyer was way out of line at that
� press conference, he was acting like prosecutor, judge, jury, and the
� USOC, what ever happened to due-process?
That's pretty much what Good Morning America/WCVB's legal editor said
this morning.
|
155.324 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Wed Feb 02 1994 10:12 | 8 |
| I think the skater was Ulrica Maier, or something close to
that.
One of the newscasts here said it was a Super G race, not
downhill. That seemed incorrect, given the speed she was
traveling down the slope.
Scott
|
155.325 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:44 | 5 |
| From one of the news stations last night: A bigwig in the ABA Defense
Attorney division basically said that as a defense attorney Gilooly's
lawyer should know that what he said was completely unacceptable.
The Crazy Met
|
155.326 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:51 | 15 |
| >From one of the news stations last night: A bigwig in the ABA Defense
>Attorney division basically said that as a defense attorney Gilooly's
>lawyer should know that what he said was completely unacceptable.
He knew full well that what he said was unacceptable, but I'd be
my paycheck that he was simply trying to sway public opinion.
Even if you figure you're of average intelligence, that means that half
the people are dumber than you, so you know that a bunch of people probably
took what he said at face value.....
That's my cut at it.....
'Saw
|
155.327 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Wed Feb 02 1994 11:53 | 3 |
| Sure he was trying to sway public opinion. so what!
The Crazy Met
|
155.328 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 02 1994 12:38 | 9 |
| >Sure he was trying to sway public opinion. so what!
Oh.
NO big deal. I was just responding to the fact that it seems some
folks couldn't get over the fact that a lawyer would do something like
ignore due process etc etc in his comments.
I mean, the guy's a LAWYER -- that should say it all 8^)
|
155.329 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Wed Feb 02 1994 15:55 | 12 |
| RE skier,
I heerd she was only doing 60 when the mishap occured(I cain't imagine
doing 60mph with nothing between me and the earth but a set of
skies)but that the course was not in the world's most skiable
condition, partly because of the chemicals they used on the snow.
The skier's child's father has pledged to sue the organizers of the
event.
JaKe
|
155.330 | Downhills are cool. I've crashed and burned on a few in my day... | DECWET::METZGER | 16 days... | Wed Feb 02 1994 16:25 | 15 |
|
It's common practice to salt a course down if the weather is warm. This makes
the course firmer. It's even done in my recreational racing league toward the
end of the season.
The racer always has the option of not running the race if they feel it's
unsafe. There have been boycotts in the past when a group decides that a course
isn't safe for racing and more often than not the officials relent.
Yes, it's a tragedy. Yes, I feel sorry for her child. However the only reason
they have for a lawsuit is either equipment failure or they are taking issue of
where the timing stand was placed.
Metz
who wanted to go skiing today but was fogged in at home....
|
155.331 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | I'mGoingToDisneyWorld/DisneyLand!! | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:47 | 22 |
| I have the real story in this Tonya Harding mess. First, CBS hired
Shawn Eckhart to mastermind this whole thing. CBS knew it was going to
take a beating in the Winter Olympics and needed to drum up interest for
the February SnoozeFest. Eckhart convinced Gillooly and Harding that since
Tonya was such a beast to Nancy Kerrigan's beauty she would never stand a
chance in a "sport" like figure skating. Once convinced Eckhart was right,
Harding and Gillooly plotted to take out Kerrigan. The irony is that
Kerrigan knew of the impending attack (she played out the victim role
convincingly, although the "why me" shriek was a bit much) and was promised
mucho endorsement dollars if she went along.
Of course CBS really didn't want Kerrigan hurt (or Harding arrested
for that matter) so they needed somebody simple enough to be the willing
pawn. Enter a stupid bodybuilder, the perfect foil. The real club was
actually in the grassy knoll while the one used on Kerrigan was rubber.
Much as CBS had hoped, this story has grabbed considerable national
attention and when Harding is allowed to skate in the Olympics she and
Nancy will be seeded #1 and #2. The rest of the skaters might as well go
see the Norwegian sights (if there are any), because CBS will not be
denied the WWF good versus bad skateoff in their Olympics.
/Don
|
155.332 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:57 | 7 |
| �CBS knew it was going to
�take a beating in the Winter Olympics and needed to drum up interest for
�the February SnoozeFest.
And here's where your whole conspiracy theory falls apart, /Don.
Figure skating always grabs great ratings and has been named as the #1
spectator sport in at least 2 recent national polls.
|
155.333 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 03 1994 12:57 | 7 |
| You forgot the part about the Space Aliens /Don, and about Chuck Connors
and the Marine.
You're slipping.......
'Saw
|
155.334 | re: .332 - you looking for logic in /er's note?? ha! | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Thu Feb 03 1994 13:00 | 14 |
| great chronology of the way this attack was bungled.
Stant flew to Boston. Went to rent a car and discovered he forgot
his credit card. Checked into the hotel at Logan under his own name.
His credit card arrived by mail after 2 days. He then rented a car
and drove out to a motel near Stoneham. Got there, checked in under
his own name and discovered that Kerrigan had already left for Detroit.
Returned the car, went to take Amtrak to Detroit and missed the train.
Eventually got to Detroit by bus. Had trouble getting a rental car
in Detroit because his credit card was over its limit. Checked in to
a motel under his own name. Carried out the attack. Checked out of the
motel, and only on the flight back to Portland used an alias.
The Crazy Met
|
155.335 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Thu Feb 03 1994 13:00 | 5 |
| I heard this morning that Nancy Kerrigan stands to earn about $10 mil
in commercial endorsements as a result of her increased popularity
due to the assault.
Jerry
|
155.336 | | METSNY::francus | Reeves, Slasher & girly-mon football | Thu Feb 03 1994 13:02 | 4 |
| and the millions that are being talked about are whether or not she
wins the Gold medal. A Gold medal multiplies that figure.
The Crazy Met
|
155.337 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 03 1994 13:18 | 1 |
| Wouldn't it be a pissah if they were both in it together?
|
155.338 | | VAXMKT::ROBICHAUD | I'mGoingToDisneyWorld/DisneyLand!! | Thu Feb 03 1994 14:07 | 7 |
| �I heard this morning that Nancy Kerrigan stands to earn about $10 mil
�in commercial endorsements as a result of her increased popularity
�due to the assault.
I'm so surprised.
/Don
|
155.339 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 03 1994 14:14 | 7 |
| �I heard this morning that Nancy Kerrigan stands to earn about $10 mil
�in commercial endorsements as a result of her increased popularity
�due to the assault.
Makes sense. This incident and the media coverage it has received have
pretty much made Nancy Kerrigan a household name. Instant name
recognition means big bucks to sponsors.
|
155.340 | | CAM3::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 03 1994 14:32 | 11 |
| Didja ever notice that Nancy gets this kind of
"doe-dee-doe-dee-doe, dum-dee-dum-dee-dum"
look on her face a lot? Kind of like someone who's clueless?
I just noticed that last night on the news. My guess is that she's not
going to be building any rockets in the near future.....
'Saw
|
155.342 | wierd stuff | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Thu Feb 03 1994 15:10 | 3 |
| Did anyone hear that they may re-open the case of Harding's murdered
brother? Seems he was involved in a hit-and-run accident soon after
Tonya told Gilooloo that he was abusing her.
|
155.343 | soap opera... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Thu Feb 03 1994 21:46 | 1 |
| please!!! will the real hit-man please stand up???
|
155.344 | As The Blade Turns | AIMHI::KERR | Livin Life By The Drop | Fri Feb 04 1994 08:49 | 8 |
| Gawd! What a great soap opera this is. Last night on the news I heard
Kerrigan's mother state that Nancy would really enjoy following
all of this if it wasn't about her. It's fun until you're in the
middle of it (although, as already mentioned, NK will pocket some major
cash for her troubles). I bet Tonya wishes she was watching instead of
participating.
|
155.345 | Rule #1 on why figure skating is not a "sport" | DECWET::METZGER | 14 days... | Fri Feb 04 1994 14:17 | 16 |
|
FBI has confirmed that Harding made the calls to find out where Kerrigan
practiced. Also She was IDed by a hotel worker as the person trying to get
Kerrigan's room number. Plus she has been caught in several lies about her
story.
Did anybody else read SI this week and the little blurb on figure skating
judges. Quite humerous IMO. In the 1988 Olympics the only change from the
initial seedings of the ice dancers was a swap of 14th and 15th place...
Six of the judges were suspended (and later re-instated) for predetermining the
standings.
Why bother having the competition if the outcome is predetermined?
Metz
|
155.346 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Feb 04 1994 14:19 | 9 |
| Fred Imus, Don's brother, said that when Warren Moon came back from
having injured ribs, lots of lineman aimed for his ribs when tackling
him, trying to get him back out of the game.
He said that now that figure skating has that element it could become
a real sport.....8^)
'Saw
|
155.347 | Not that different | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Fri Feb 04 1994 14:26 | 11 |
| I was thinking about this the other day. You go back to when the
Giants were purposely going after MacMahon with intent to injure.
That's true of many situations in football and hockey. Somehow though,
it falls in the context of the game and seems forbidden from outside
law on assault. If someone went up to another person on the street and
whacked them with a hockey stick, they'd get arrested - provided they
were caught and prosecuted. Yet in the sports arena it's deemed ok, at
least there isn't anything done about it in most cases.
Spud
|
155.348 | Full contact figure skating? | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Fri Feb 04 1994 14:44 | 4 |
| Maybe we ought to start a movement to make figure skating a contact
sport. Hell, there's probably even a Miller Lite commercial in this.
Jerry
|
155.349 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Feb 04 1994 14:48 | 42 |
| > I was thinking about this the other day. You go back to when the
> Giants were purposely going after MacMahon with intent to injure.
Well, Spud, let's not single that one out. 8^)
There's a novel written by a DL from the Falcons, and a buddy of mine
in here read it. He was telling me that one of the major premises
of the book is that every hit in football is made with the intent
to cause as much pain and injury as possible.
> That's true of many situations in football and hockey. Somehow though,
> it falls in the context of the game and seems forbidden from outside
> law on assault. If someone went up to another person on the street and
I think it exists in other sports too. You want to let the guy know
you're there.
How often have you been playing ball and had an infielder not fielding
the ball standing in the basepath and how many times have you gone around
him? How many times have you gone over him to send a message?
Pete Rose hitting any catcher at the plate was designed to send a
message -- and perhaps make them flinch the next time.
It is strange that as long as those things are done in the context of The
Game society doesn't frown on it.
I suppose you could make a case that humans are by nature agressive animals
and that our games have replaces the hunter/killer urges that we sometimes
have -- violence in a controlled atmosphere is okay, whereas out on the
street, unchecked, it isn't.....
T'is the stuff that theses are made of.....
'Saw
|
155.350 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 04 1994 15:15 | 8 |
| �It is strange that as long as those things are done in the context of The
�Game society doesn't frown on it.
Try telling that to the NHL, MLB (remember the big outcry of
basebrawl?), the NBA (look at the stiffer fighting penalties.
Not too long ago a Boston mayor (Flynn?) threatened to send cops onto
the ice to arrest NHL goons.
|
155.351 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Feb 04 1994 15:38 | 35 |
| > Try telling that to the NHL, MLB (remember the big outcry of
> basebrawl?), the NBA (look at the stiffer fighting penalties.
And try taking that away from the fans and see how far it gets.
Nobody give a shit about fighting in hoops because the Linda Evans vs
Joan Collins fights in Dynasty were closer to real fighting than the
hissy-fit slapfests those genetic mutants have in hoops.
Baseball had problems because the incidents rose sharply in a short
period of time, plus all those millionaires got to be really nancy-boys
who couldn't take the heat inside.
Hockey should continue to have fighting. Period.
> Not too long ago a Boston mayor (Flynn?) threatened to send cops onto
> the ice to arrest NHL goons.
Yeah, he threatened. And do you know what would have happened had he
carried through with it? They couldn't have poured enough cops into the
Garden quick enough to quell the riot.
There was a very interesting Time Machine episode about a month ago that
dealt with the gladatorial games of Ancient Rome. What was interesting
is that after 2000 years, folks still wanna see blood and gore, but they're
less open about wanting to see it.
Human beings have a natural curiousity about death and stuff like that,
and it can't be totally repressed....
'Saw
|
155.352 | | GENRAL::WADE | | Fri Feb 04 1994 17:36 | 8 |
|
re. Basketball hissy-fit slapfights
I'll betcha Rudy Tomjanovich would argue with that! :*)
He of the caved in face........
Claybone
|
155.353 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Feb 07 1994 08:47 | 9 |
| Claybone,
Who hit Rudy T? I wanna say Kermit Washington. That punch
was no slap (in the face). 'Course, it didn't help that
Rudy T was running toward/past KW when the punch was
thrown. Lots of momentum. It's a wonder KW didn't break
his hand or wrist.
Scott
|
155.354 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Mon Feb 07 1994 08:55 | 1 |
| yup it was Kermit Washington
|
155.355 | | SALEM::DODA | Stand and deliver | Tue Feb 08 1994 10:33 | 6 |
| When did the FBI become a private dick for the USFSA?
Since when does the FBI "share" files on an ongoing
investigation with a private group?
daryll
|
155.356 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Tue Feb 08 1994 12:33 | 5 |
| did the FBI do that? I thought the USFSA folks were going to go to
Portland. When the authorities told 'em that they would not be given
any non-public information they cancelled their trip.
The Crazy Met
|
155.357 | should this be in the Boxing note instead? ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Feb 08 1994 13:51 | 15 |
|
Yabbut no mention that the IOC has put Tonya and Nancy together for
practive times??????
What a bone head move (or was it CBS's decision? Naw, couldn't be).
Do ya think CBS would get any calls from the soap box tee vee crowd
if'n they pre-empted "as the woild turnsn" to show the practice
sessions?
I remain,
absolutely convinced I'll not watch
Kev
|
155.358 | | SALEM::DODA | Stand and deliver | Tue Feb 08 1994 14:04 | 2 |
| According to the press conference they held Saturday, they had
been going over the files the FBI had on the case.
|
155.359 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 08 1994 14:41 | 16 |
| >
> Yabbut no mention that the IOC has put Tonya and Nancy together for
> practive times??????
Jeff Greenfield, on Imus this morning said that Tonya should show up with
a rifle -- then just say she's on the biathalon team. That would be
funny.
From all the news I've been hearing though, the funniest part of this whole
thing is that Kerrigan, who's going to get a massive sympathy vote for her
po' po' knee, is not even favored to win gold. Nor is Harding. These two
ladies could definitely finish in 5th and 6th place, and this would all
be for naught. And would I laugh.
I'd laugh even harder if Kerrigan was in on the whole thing too.....8^)
|
155.360 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Tue Feb 08 1994 14:42 | 7 |
| yabbut, won't Carol be controlling the remote??
ISU (International Skating Union??) has skaters from the same country
practice at the same time. They claim they only want a media circus at
one practice session not at 2. Nonetheless, a bonehead decision.
The Crazy Met
|
155.361 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Tue Feb 08 1994 14:43 | 5 |
| re: .359
yabbut Kerrigan would still get endorsements.
The Crazy Met
|
155.362 | Let it go; everything will be okay shortly... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 08 1994 15:05 | 16 |
|
> yabbut Kerrigan would still get endorsements.
This fact just keeps coming back to bug the hell out of people, huh?
Who cares? So far I've seen a couple of Campbell's soup commercials,
and if the past is any guide after the Olympics we'll see a few
commercials for about three weeks and then Kerrigan and the rest of the
skaters will forever disappear into their niche markets. It doesn't
begin to approach the mainstream hype of athletes from pro hoops/
football/baseball...
This saga sure is receiving a lot of attention from people who claim
they don't care... ;-)
glenn
|
155.364 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 08 1994 15:48 | 13 |
| It could be as bad as the Mary Lou Retton gag-fest we had
back then....
I mean, I think if I saw that Super Charged commercial one
more time, I'd have taken a rifle myself and hunted her down....8^)
This whole thing is pretty funny. I bet Kerrigan was involved, and
after doing some jail time Harding will get a "split" of the
endorsement profits.... Yeah, that's the ticket....
'Saw
|
155.365 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Tue Feb 08 1994 15:49 | 6 |
| re: .362
Glenn, I actually wasn't complaining. Just stating a fact.
Far as I'm concerned if she can rake in the bucks, good for her.
The Crazy Met
|
155.366 | and again tomorrow AM.... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:06 | 16 |
|
Yabbut since I listen to the radion a lot at home, ya just can't
escape from a lot of this.
Anyway, I heard the day before yesterday that NK has been signed by
at least 3 major sponsors. The only $$$ figure I remember was $450K
but I did remember the announcer saying that NK is now the wealthiest
skater ever to compete in the 'pics.
Soo, Craze, it seems she's raking in the $$$. Happy?
I remain,
probably gonna rake in the snow thisted PM :^(
Kev
|
155.367 | Bo Jackson's career didn't merit the hype...life ain't fair... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:20 | 28 |
|
> Obviously, the people that it bugs the hell out of. Nancy Kerrigan was
> just an Olympic bronze medalist before this incident. Now, she stands to
> rake in more dough than any figure skater in history. And for what? Not
> because she's a great skater but because she was lucky (?) enough to be
> the target of a pack of half-wits. Now, we've got a book about Nancy and
> the soup commercials are in heavy rotation and Reebok is pushing her heavy
> although the connection between figure skating and sneakers escapes me.
All of which is the product of those starved for the gossip that the
tabloid media gladly provides, and not any special action which Kerrigan
has undertaken. Far as I can tell, the grave concern over the
attention she'll get and the amount of money she's going to make just
amounts to jealousy, same as with the other professional athletes that
we love to hate, except in this case because we're talking about a
"sport" that appeals more to females that we personally might not be
interested in, it's somehow worse the assault of show commercials by
the hoops players. If people (in general) didn't want to see Kerrigan's
face after the Olympics, they wouldn't get it. The marketers aren't
stupid.
I don't even know if I'll watch any of the Winter Olympics much less
the figure skating (none of it holds much appeal at all), but I don't
have any good reason to want to see Kerrigan fail. I hope she does win
the gold...
glenn
|
155.368 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:22 | 5 |
| > I hope she does win the gold...
I am sure there is a very rational reason for that (.5 :-)
The Crazy Met
|
155.369 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:27 | 10 |
|
> I am sure there is a very rational reason for that (.5 :-)
Sure there is. All things being equal (like the athlete isn't a
complete jerk) most Americans like to see the American athletes do
well. I'm not talking about support with fanatical nationalistic
flag-waving fervor thrown in, just in general...
glenn
|
155.370 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:29 | 8 |
| for the same reason you could also root for Harding to win the goal.
Actually it would be great to see Harding win the gold - of course the
judges would never allow that to happen. She would have to skate much better
than anyone else to even have a chance at the Bronze medal.
The Crazy Met
|
155.371 | You know, those nagging little details, TCM... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:33 | 8 |
|
> for the same reason you could also root for Harding to win the goal.
I would, if (personal opinion alert) I thought that there was even a
remote chance that she is innocent in this affair...
glenn
|
155.372 | Luge (or might have been bobsled)? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Feb 08 1994 16:47 | 12 |
|
Yabbut just to change the subject. Did anybody else happen to see
the tee vee commercial advertising that the OC is looking for kids
9-12 to begin luge training? They even posted some 800 number to
call. I was half occupied with something else and didn't really get it
all.
I remain,
wondering if this begins a new era in USA Olympic involvement
Kev
|
155.373 | (8^)* | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Tue Feb 08 1994 17:01 | 6 |
| Maybe you shoulc call, Kev, put on one of yer baseball caps, a tight
pari of underwear to lift the voice a little, and with yer size, ya
might be able to pass fer a 9-12 year old.
JaKe
|
155.374 | overexposure inc. | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Wed Feb 09 1994 09:00 | 6 |
|
Nancy Kerrigan has signed on to guest host Saturday
Night Live on March 19 (presumably with or without medal).
They should have some fun with the Tonya story, huh?
dr.a
|
155.377 | It's ridiculous, but don't blame Kerrigan (at least not yet) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 09 1994 10:34 | 34 |
|
> No hoops player, save Michael Jordan and Shaq, has ever gotten
> this kind of exposure, and Michael was the best player on the planet and
> Shaq has a freak factor from smashing all those backboards. All Nancy has
> done is take a whack on the leg. By those standards Rodney King should be
> a billionaire.
I believe that 95% of the exposure that you are referring to *thus far*
has been involuntary. That's the distinction I'm making. Kerrigan has
no control over the media horde camped at the bottom of her driveway,
nor the talkshow buzz, nor the around-the-clock news coverage. That
she doesn't "deserve" such attention is quite likely a sentiment
that she agrees with 100%, that she'd just as soon not have at the
moment. I can't blame a seemingly decent, hardworking athlete because
she happened to be the unwitting subject of this bizarre story that
won't go away. I hope it goes away as much as anyone else, but not by
wishing that Kerrigan crashes into the boards at the Olympics or
something like that.
Sure Kerrigan is ultimately going to capitalize on this attention, and
I'll reserve judgment on how tastefully it's done until that time. So
far I haven't seen much that she's been responsible for that's turned
my stomach, and actually think she's behaved pretty graciously, more
graciously than the average athlete besieged by the media pack. To
tell you the truth, I was kind of surprised by the SNL acceptance,
because that'll be an opportunity to poke some fun and be poked at
that doesn't fit with the ice queen image (she certainly doesn't need
to do this). But whereas most people loved Charles Barkley punching
out Barney and having some fun with it, no doubt the cynics will be
appalled that as a celebrity Kerrigan would go on a comedy program and
do the same...
glenn
|
155.378 | Just as overhyped | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Feb 09 1994 10:51 | 4 |
| > in the last Olympics. No one but Dick Button can name a previous third
> place finisher. And now the girl is everywhere. She won't be gone three
Debi Thomas, the U.S. hope in 1988.
|
155.379 | another 10 on TBOS.... | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Wed Feb 09 1994 10:56 | 11 |
|
FWIW, Kerrigan was doing Campell Soup commercials before she was attacked.
Also before she was attacked, I saw an article that figured if she medaled
at the olympics she'd make about 10 million in endorsements, 20 million if
she brought home the gold........
Personally I have nothing against either skater but I'd like to see them
throw Toyna off the team so that little 13 old pixie could get under
Tommy's skin just a bit....
;^)
|
155.380 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 11:40 | 3 |
| I think SNL was March 12.
The Crazy Met
|
155.381 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 09 1994 12:36 | 10 |
| � Yabbut no mention that the IOC has put Tonya and Nancy together for
� practive times??????
�
� What a bone head move (or was it CBS's decision? Naw, couldn't be).
The way I heard it was that practice times are alloted for each team.
That is, the U.S. has a practice time, Sweden has a practice time,
Russia has a practice time, etc. The decision that was made was to
make the U.S. team adhere to this policy and not grant special favors
to Kerrigan.
|
155.382 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 09 1994 12:52 | 12 |
| � Bo Jackson played two professionla sports quite well and could have
� ranked with the best running backs ever if he chose to concentrate on
� that.
I think a hip injury had more to do with that than him playing
baseball.
�He certainly doesn't deserve to be lumped in with also-ran Nancy
� Kerrigan.
Also ran? A bronze medal holder and best skater in the U.S. is an also
ran?
|
155.384 | True competitors yearn for competition. Winning's a byproduct | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Feb 09 1994 14:09 | 11 |
| Times are tough when finishing 3rd in the Olympics rates you_a
"also-ran". Sadly this is a typical America reaction to SPORTS,
where finishing FIRST, winning the GOLD, is all that matters.
Nobody remembers who came in 2nd, nobody cares. It's the winning that's
the thing, not the competing.
Sad.
- ACC Chris
|
155.385 | you can tell who roots for teams that CHOKE! | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 14:12 | 3 |
| coming from a UNC and Smiffy fan that attitude is hardly surprising.
The Crazy Met
|
155.386 | re: .385 I rest my case. | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Feb 09 1994 14:23 | 1 |
|
|
155.387 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 14:29 | 8 |
| hahahahaha .386 is precious.
So you are basically admitting that UNC and Smiffy choke in the big ones and
you need to console yourself with the "competition is the thing."
heh heh
The Crazy Met
|
155.388 | | DECWET::METZGER | 11 days... | Wed Feb 09 1994 14:41 | 18 |
|
Actually I think that Kerrigan was one of the gold medal favorites for this
years olympics. yup, she was lousy in the last world championships but
finishing so poorly supposedly lit a fire under her butt to actually go out and
do some serious practice time. It seems like Nancy used to just slough around
a lot in practice and not work as hard as many of the other skaters. She was
reportedly skating the best she ever had before the incident....and since we
all know that reputation counts as much in the judging world as actual
performance she had a very good shot at winning the gold even before the hype...
What's unfortunate is that this country is so law-suit aware that an obviously
guilty Harding will most likely be allowed to skate in the olympics for fear of
the presiding committees getting sued....
Dorothy Hamill has made over $100 million off her olympic gold medal...Sonya
Henny (sp) made almost $250 million off of hers....
Metz
|
155.389 | I'm sure glad Metz isn't judge/jury/executioner | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 15:26 | 8 |
| re: that an obviously guilty Harding
so I guess we forget about due process and convict people based on
assumptions. You may not agree with the safeguards that are buil in
to the system, but they do exist and until that changes it is not
fair to use a different set of rules with Harding.
The Crazy Met
|
155.390 | Metz nailed it: why is a conviction necessary? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Feb 09 1994 16:23 | 23 |
|
> so I guess we forget about due process and convict people based on
> assumptions. You may not agree with the safeguards that are buil in
> to the system, but they do exist and until that changes it is not
> fair to use a different set of rules with Harding.
In the interests of putting a cap on this rathole I restrained myself,
but initially I was going to say that someone (Metz) finally had
exercised some common sense and reached the correct conclusion of what
all this USOC hand-wringing is really all about. Just from what
Harding has already admitted to (concealed knowledge of this plot by
her associates as the USFSA was deliberating her teammate's fate in the
Olympics-- never mind the piles of circumstantial evidence implicating
her even further, without necessarily having committed a crime), she
should be disqualified. Unfortunately, currently in this country common
sense runs secondary to the fear of what a particular jury on a particular
day might think. Personally, based on the evidence and that Olympic
contract she signed, I think the USOC has every legal right to boot
her, and should have the courage to do so and to fight it out in court,
if necessary.
glenn
|
155.391 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 16:30 | 14 |
| Glenn,
But Metz was not talking about the USOC's right to hold an administrative
hearing and base the decision on something other than criminal actions.
A statement of obvioulsy guilty sure sounded like guilty of a criminal offense.
I could be mis-interpreting that statement, but I don't think so. Metz??
fwiw when the USFSA was deliberating over putting Kerrigan on the Olympic
team Harding claims she had no knowledge of anything wrt to the attack.
The lawsuit threat certainly has an effect, but it is also making the
USOC think twice before making a decision and that is not bad.
The Crazy Met
|
155.392 | Does anybody seriously think she's innocent? | DECWET::METZGER | 9 days... | Wed Feb 09 1994 16:43 | 21 |
|
I think she's obviously guilty as far as the USOC charter is concerned and
should be booted off the team. I'd never deny her due process as far as
criminal charges go. The fact of the matter is that she has publicly admitted
enough to justify booting her off the team but all the governing bodies as too
afraid of law suits to do the right thing and chuck her off the team.
The US figure skating body has already stated that she has done enough to be
booted but scheduled administrative action in 30 days which is after the
Olympics to weasel their way out of taking any action on the matter. As fine an
example of CYA as I've seen (even inside of DEC).
Personally I'm 100% convinced by the FBI evidence, Gilgully's statements,
Harding's own admissions and the blowhard Eckhardts testimony to say she's
guilty of a crime but I'm not on the grand jury. I think that only the most
blinded Harding supporters think she wasn't involved enough to get her booted
off the team....
No wonder the courts are clogged,
Metz
|
155.393 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 16:46 | 6 |
| Metz, actually the USFSA scheduled a hearing and under their by-laws
Harding has 30 days to appear. So their hands were tied by their own
rules. They might have been able to ask for a hearing earlier than they did
but 30 days before Feb 23 would have been tough.
The Crazy Met
|
155.395 | show her what a world of bad sports is like | DECWET::METZGER | 9 days... | Wed Feb 09 1994 16:57 | 12 |
|
In some perverted sort of way I'd like to see Harding go to the games and get
booed to all hell by a crowd that won't even let her hear her music. I'd like
to see her skate off in tears devestated and then maybe she'd understand a
little bit about what sportsmanship is.
Instead of roses maybe the crowd can throw dead fish on the ice...
Metz
|
155.396 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 17:00 | 27 |
|
The USOC may very well decide on 2/15 to not let Harding compete. If they
do so, Harding will likely file an appeal in a US court. US courts are
very quick to grant injunctions. USOC would be bound by a US court's decision.
Come to think of it the USOC could really take the easy way out (brilliant
if I say so myself):
They could vote to remove Harding from the Olympic team, but delay that
removal until Harding exhausted all her appeals. By the time that happened
the Olympics would be over and Harding would have skated. USOC could not
be sued. If Harding wins a medal they could eventually strip it.
re: Harding winning a medal
If she does compete, the odds that she will win a medal are definitely
astronomical. All the other contenders would have to fall flat on their
backsides for that to happen.
> Kwan kid really deserves to go but won't.
She will be in Norway as an alternate. Keep in mind that there were only 2
spots on the team. Kerrigan and Harding were odds-on-favorites to be on
the team. So it would be nice if Kwan got to compete, but "deserves?" I don't
agree.
The Crazy Met
|
155.397 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Wed Feb 09 1994 17:06 | 2 |
| I haven't seen anyone mention it, but the team skating together is an
Olympic tradition that the USOC chairman said would not be broken.
|
155.398 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 17:07 | 5 |
| Nope, the ISU won't allow the tradition to be broken. USOC was more
than happy to accomodate the request that Harding and Kerrigan skate
at different practice sessions.
The Crazy Met
|
155.399 | SI on th and nyfg vs bc | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Feb 09 1994 17:25 | 18 |
| SI (btw I hear this weeks issue has some good basketball writing,
perhaps I'll shell out some cash) echoed my earlier point about
"misuse of money". But only hard evidence which th cannot give a
convincing rebuttal for should be used - nothing in the gildickart
testimonies. I mean, the misuse of $ may be the wire they hang her on
and outweasel nat'l figure skating assn.
Also, in SI (thank god for those dr's waiting rooms) was a recount of
giants vs colts, '58 (took place apparently in jan-59 because of
giant-brown playoff). Boy what memories. I probably was a bigger
giant fan then as I've ever been for any team (save 60s celts,'67 sox).
As I've said in other notes and probably again, the difference was the
drama of the action. If it exists today I sure don't see it except on
some radio play by play. Thank god we didn't have John Maddens and
Dick Enbergs back then.
Billte
|
155.400 | SI question ... | RHETT::KNORR | Carolina Blue | Wed Feb 09 1994 17:38 | 9 |
| re: SI
Does this weeks SI have an article on the Duke vs. UNC rivalry? I
heard that Alexander Woolf was at the Dean Dome the other night as part
of a feature story.
thanks,
Chris
|
155.401 | USOC will back down | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Feb 09 1994 18:00 | 12 |
| The Europeans are very upset that all the Kerrigan sentiment may
persuade the judges to reward her with sympathy points and propel her
past some other deserving skaters including two-time champion Witt of
Germany,a frenchwoman and a japanese skater among others.
My guess is the USOC will buckle under and allow Harding to compete.
The television ratings are too enticing for them to keep her from
competing before being convicted. They are still smarting from losing
big in the Butch Reynolds' decision.
|
155.402 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 19:38 | 6 |
| Witt finished 8th in the European Championships. Not even she expects
to medal in the Olympics. The big losers could be Bonaly of France,
the skater from Japan, and the skater from Ukraine.
The Crazy Met
|
155.403 | but i'm nuetral...really... | SALEM::STIG | for all have sinned | Wed Feb 09 1994 20:57 | 4 |
| I think the only way that tonya will win a medal is to mastermind
another PLOT maybe...
stig
|
155.404 | See ya in court! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Feb 09 1994 22:15 | 9 |
|
Yabbut I just heard on the radion that Tonya's attorneys have filed
a multi-million dollar lawsuit. No further details.
I remain,
yer news brreaker (sometimes)
Kev
|
155.405 | At Witt's end | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Feb 09 1994 22:53 | 4 |
| TCM:
Thanks for the correction. I forgot about the Ukrainian skater.
|
155.406 | As the world spins | MSE1::FRANCUS | Billlls in '94 | Wed Feb 09 1994 23:21 | 8 |
| $20 million law suit by Harding against the USOC. They are asking for
an injunction against any USOC action.
Gilooly is asking for permission to travle to Oslo to testify at the
hearing on 2/15. Judge will probably grant permission.
The Crazy Met
|
155.407 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Thu Feb 10 1994 00:03 | 4 |
| SO it's all a "get rich quick" scheme for Tonya, eh???
JaKe
|
155.408 | is it true?? | SALEM::STIG | Dogman | Thu Feb 10 1994 07:18 | 3 |
| I heard that she is going to pose for playboy also...oh boy...
stig
|
155.409 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Thu Feb 10 1994 09:12 | 11 |
| I wonder who's paying for Gilooly's trip to Norway?
Tonya Harding and Playboy in the same breath (or sentence)
doesn't quite sound right.
I think they ought to let TH skate. If she medals, and is then
convicted, they can take the medal.
I heard $20 million law suit.
Scott
|
155.410 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Thu Feb 10 1994 09:19 | 10 |
| Chris,
I haven't bought the SI yet so I don't know about Duke-NC.
It appears that they are doing a big spread.. ahem on women's
volleyball or surfing as muscular ...ahem women are on the cover this
week.
I'll see you over in big east as I managed to ketch quite a bit of
the bc-conn game last night and Russ is waiting with bb for bb's
comments
|
155.411 | Heard on Imus this morning, but I can never tell what is a put on on that show | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Thu Feb 10 1994 09:35 | 3 |
| Harding was supposed to have gotten $650K for her interview with "Hard Copy".
I'd let them interview me for half that.
|
155.412 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 10 1994 09:39 | 6 |
|
The pre-emptive first strike lawsuit... guilty until proven innocent
until proven guilty...
glenn
|
155.413 | Fire one!! | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Feb 10 1994 10:24 | 10 |
| Just goes to reinforce the old story that when you have a bunch of
lawyers buried up to their necks in sand, you don't have enough
sand.
Well this should be all cleared up by the next Winter Olympics.
MikeL
|
155.414 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Thu Feb 10 1994 12:21 | 3 |
| According to the ACChris School of Conspiracy, Kerrigan and Harding
have been in this together from the start. They're giving kickbacks to
each other from their various stints and endorsements.
|
155.415 | and KJ was the hitman | HBAHBA::HAAS | I Shun You, Version 3 for Windows | Thu Feb 10 1994 13:03 | 0 |
155.416 | What JD really thinks of the soap opera... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Thu Feb 10 1994 15:54 | 14 |
| Did the Internet thang with ol' JD a few times today about running this weekend.
On the subject of the Tonya/Nancy soap opera, he said:
"Tonya roolz"
When both our friend Phil and I pointed out certain, uhh, virtues of Nancy,
JD responded:
"You guys are sick. Tonya is a real woman, not a fake
woman like Chopper Kerrigan. Tonya's a black
leather type gal, Kerrigan's a preppy whale shorts type
gal..."
=Bob=
|
155.417 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 10 1994 15:58 | 8 |
| While not particularly caring for either one of them, I will say that
whenever I see Nancy Kerrigan, I can just hear the wind whistling through
her ears.....
Like Imus says "I guess she didn't have much time to spend in the library"
'SAw
|
155.418 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 10 1994 15:59 | 13 |
| btw, keep an eye out for the Marv Albert video that's being shilled along
with new subscriptions for SI.
In one highlight clip they show two skaters practicing and inadvertantly
bashing into each other.
I laughed so hard when I saw it I almost choked on a piece of my
sandwhich.
Skating as it was meant to be, surely!
'Saw
|
155.419 | My role model | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Thu Feb 10 1994 17:09 | 35 |
| I'm doing a total turnaround on this..
I fully support Tonya's efforts to win da gold. She epitomizes all
that is America.. She represents it all..
Trash talks her opponents, smokes Winston, drinks VO on da rocks,
marries a Tshirt hustler, conspires to commit an assault, admits
to obstruction of justice, manipulates da press to portray her as
the "victim" ( her mom tore off her hangnail when she was 3),
coerces 650K outta 'Inside Edition' for the sympathy vote,
and the coup de grace... the Americain dream.. She SUES!!
My hero! I'm smitten! She's up there with apple pie and the flag..
I hope she runs for political ofc when she returns. How All-
American can you get!! Purty soon she'll replace Mike Eruzione as
America's guest.. companies will be falling all over themselves
for motivational speeches.. She's on the fast track.
All she's left to do is keep it up in Lillehammer.. take a little
Brillo to her rivals' skates before they go on.. foolproof..
And when she returns, she can take that gold medal and pawn it for
a new Chevy truck. What an American icon...
In fact, she impresses me so much, I'm gonna follow her example.,
I always wanted to figure skate for gold for my country (wheee) but a
rink rat told me I was too slow. I've suffereed so much
emotional damage since then, I deserve to be compensated. Let's
see, where's my lawyers' (Cheatam, Fleeecam, and Sioux) number?
How do you spell USOC??
I won't forget you guys when I'm filthy rich.. I deserve to be,
Y'unnerstan'..
MikeL
|
155.420 | I agree Mike | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Digital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's all | Thu Feb 10 1994 18:24 | 9 |
| Mike ya forgot that after te olympics she's gonna bare it all fer Playboy.
She has used thuggery, sympathy and now her body all for MONEY. What a girl.
She runs barefoot to save her Chevy from being towed.
She where's a tee shirt that says "NO COMMENT"
Next thing we will learn is that she not Hillary developed the Health care
plan.
Jeff
|
155.421 | | DECWET::METZGER | 8 days... | Thu Feb 10 1994 18:44 | 7 |
| >Mike ya forgot that after te olympics she's gonna bare it all fer Playboy.
shudder, shudder...
I'm sure Mr T would have some colorful commentary on this layout..
Metz
|
155.422 | a file might work in jail though... | SALEM::STIG | Dogman | Thu Feb 10 1994 23:08 | 6 |
| and.... they'll probably will do a layout of her working on her truck.
Re. MikeL...I'm roaring on the "brillo" thaing...she'd be able to
conceal that easier rather than a file.
stig
|
155.424 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Feb 11 1994 09:12 | 17 |
| Nah Kerrigan's not gonna carry the flag according to the Globe.
One of the women lugers will do it.
Looks like Tonya wants to give Nancy a hug. Wonder if she'll give
her a kidney punch in the clinch.
Po' Tonya is a natural actor, she was soooo sincere and demure on the
Inside Edition edition. Was she as milquetoast with Connie Chung?
Tonya'd be a natural for the Dominatrix in those female prison
movies MrT used to salivate over..
Cain't wait till they both skate. Is it true that Tonya will lead off
with AC/DC's "Dirty Deads Done Dirt Cheap"? If so, Nancy's gotsta
follow with Ian Drury's "Hit Me with Your Rhythm Stick".
MikeL
|
155.425 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Fri Feb 11 1994 09:45 | 4 |
| Nah Nancy 'll start off with Pat Benatar's Hit Me With Your Best Shot.
The Crazy Met
|
155.427 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Feb 11 1994 10:04 | 13 |
| Yea, she soitanly gets mo' press than mah suit pants..
As she said in Detriot and I paraphrase "No one prolly knew who I
was before this, and now everyone will know me." I thinbk she's
handled it purty well, all this free pub. She already had the Campbell
and Reebok contracts negotiated. Lowkey is the key for Kerrigan.
But ah will watch her SNL in March.. just fer sh$t's sake.
I suppose the proposed Harding-Kerrigan "hug" will require mo'
press credentials than the Israeli-PLO agreement summit.
MikeL
|
155.428 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Fri Feb 11 1994 10:58 | 7 |
| > One of the women lugers will do it.
They have an event for fresh water clamming?!
> follow with Ian Drury's "Hit Me with Your Rhythm Stick".
boy does that bring back memories!
|
155.429 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Fri Feb 11 1994 11:04 | 5 |
| Ghandi was too passive and didn't deserve the hype.
> press credentials than the Israeli-PLO agreement summit.
speakin of faux pas agreements.
|
155.430 | Reasons to be cheerful, part 3 | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Fri Feb 11 1994 12:41 | 5 |
| MikeL, it's Ian Dury.
Yer weclome.
Mark.
|
155.431 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 11 1994 13:12 | 6 |
| �While not particularly caring for either one of them, I will say that
�whenever I see Nancy Kerrigan, I can just hear the wind whistling through
�her ears.....
So we should forgo SAT's and IQ tests and just take a look at folks to
determine how intelligent they are?
|
155.433 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 11 1994 13:31 | 9 |
| Well, Jeff, the thuggery hasn't been proven yet.
�She runs barefoot to save her Chevy from being towed.
Wouldn't you?
�She where's a tee shirt that says "NO COMMENT"
I thought that was kind of clever.
|
155.434 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 11 1994 13:38 | 1 |
| Tommy, don't forget, Nancy is a "local".
|
155.435 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 11 1994 13:49 | 5 |
| � speakin of faux pas agreements.
Unless I'm missing something, I think you need to look faux pas up in
your dictionary and get a better understanding of the meaning of the
term.
|
155.436 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Feb 11 1994 13:52 | 10 |
| Yabut Saw has been taking his buddy Imus a little too seriously on this
subject. The I-man was groping for some reasong to put Kerrigan down, and
for some reason decided to focus on her looks and intelligence.
As for her appearance, hey, maybe she's no Cindy Crawford, but I still like
the way she fills up a pair of skating tights. As far as her intelligence,
bear in mind that we only see her (or Tonya) through the media, and have no
clue what she is really like.
=Bob=
|
155.438 | If it ain't sports, and ain't interesting, let's let it go | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Fri Feb 11 1994 14:31 | 15 |
|
> There's this
> fascination with the seamy side of things and with the sordid de-
> tails of people's lives these days that I find to be distasteful.
So why do we continue to flay this rotting carcass of a subject,
again... and again.. and again. We're wasting valuable SPROTS disk
space and bandwidth, not to mention the talents of some of the most
sports-knowledgeable resources in the world. ;-)
But seriously, based on the gossip, name-calling and general tawdriness
going on in here, the media has been tastefully restrained by comparison...
glenn
|
155.439 | now there's a real challenge for a skater | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Fri Feb 11 1994 15:02 | 1 |
| > skater. She's not supposed to be Hillary Clinton's smarter sister. I
|
155.440 | Goodnight, Mac | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Fri Feb 11 1994 15:06 | 1 |
| > Unless I'm missing something,
|
155.441 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 11 1994 15:15 | 1 |
| OK, help me out here, Mike. How do you define faux pas?
|
155.442 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Feb 11 1994 15:21 | 5 |
| from the 'Merican Heritage Dictionary (BTW, the worst dictionary I've ever
used):
faux pas pl. faux pas
A social blunder [Fr.]
|
155.443 | La derriere neuf | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Feb 11 1994 15:24 | 2 |
| I once had faux pas on the back side at Trull but the 15th killed
me.
|
155.444 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! | Fri Feb 11 1994 15:41 | 3 |
| > OK, help me out here, Mike. How do you define faux pas?
"social blunder" per the DEC-issued American Heritage Dictionary.
|
155.445 | Toy's Rule
| OURGNG::RIGGEN | Digital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's all | Fri Feb 11 1994 16:35 | 6 |
| �She runs barefoot to save her Chevy from being towed.
Wouldn't you?
Only to pay the driver to take it away.
|
155.446 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Fri Feb 11 1994 16:45 | 15 |
| > -< Toy's Rule
>-
American steel is better 8^)
>Only to pay the driver to take it away.
I've had excellent luck with my GMC pickup and there's no way I'd
ever buy another Japanese vehicle. I decided today that my
truck definitely paid for itself this winter.....
'Saw
|
155.447 | | GENRAL::WADE | My head's in Mississippi | Fri Feb 11 1994 16:57 | 8 |
|
You got the "Toy" part right Riggo. It's nothin' but a toy.
When you're ready to graduate up to a real main's truck, you
let me know. I might let you drive mine first to see if you
can handle it.
Claybone (owner of a Ford F250 Heavy Duty Supercab 4X4 5 speed wif
a 7.3 l rompin', stompin' diesel!)
|
155.448 | BACK TO THE WINTER OLYMPICS | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Digital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's all | Fri Feb 11 1994 17:07 | 12 |
| Did anybody see the Nowegian ski jumper fall trying to light the torch in
pratice.
Ole Gunnar Fidjestol hored to end his ski-jumping career with the leap of his
life: Flying through the air clutching the Olympic flame at the opening
ceremonies. But Fidjestol tumbled head-first into the snow, suffering a mild
concussion that forced him to turn the torch over to another Norwegian Jumper.
Jeff
Trivia for the Olympics what is AJ kitts real first name ?
|
155.449 | 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Fri Feb 11 1994 17:41 | 17 |
| >>CAPNET::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Product Management" 5 lines 11-FEB-1994 12:41
>> -< Reasons to be cheerful, part 3 >-
Yes me main, another beeyootiful and whacko ballad
by the Haid Blockhaid
>> MikeL, it's Ian Dury.
Ah wot's a dropped "R" among Bostonians..
>> Yer weclome.
^^
Thnak yer
MikeL of the FatFingered Police
|
155.450 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Billlls in '94 | Sat Feb 12 1994 23:14 | 7 |
| Harding and USOC came to an agreement.
USOC will not hold any hearing until after the Olympics. Harding
dropped her lawsuit. Harding will be on the US team.
The Crazy Met
|
155.451 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Billlls in '94 | Sun Feb 13 1994 23:55 | 4 |
| Tommy Moe wins the Gold in Alpine Skiing downhill.
The Crazy Met
|
155.452 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 14 1994 08:18 | 13 |
| Just in case folks want to be surprised when they watch the tape
delayed broadcasts, I'd suggest posting updates behind a form-feed:
Duncan Kennedy was disqualified from luge competition when he crashed
during a run today.
He was unhurt, but is now out of the competition.....
'sAw
|
155.453 | Updates from Feb 13 and early 14th | BRAT::LEARY | Bear Mountain garage sale finalist | Mon Feb 14 1994 09:16 | 10 |
|
I just heard on WEEI that Dan Janssen was eliminated from the 500m
speed skating. Tommy Moe and another US skier are running 3rd and 2nd
respectively in the men's combined Alpine behind the Nord that was
favored heavily. Big boss Koss resets the world record in the 5000m
speed skating he has personally lowered the world record by over 7
seconds in the past 3 years. There were 200,000 people on the waiting
list for tickets to his race. WOW!
ML
|
155.454 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 14 1994 09:16 | 14 |
| In watching the broadcasts for the Olympics, I must say I've been
VERY impressed with the IBM ads. It's easy to see why we're wallowing
where we are in the marketplace when you compare our ads with those
of Big Blue.
Granted, we don't have the fact that we were picked to help plan the
Olympics to boast about like they do, but those are certainly some slick
and catchy ads.
I like the Coca-Cola Polar Bears about the best though...8^)
'SAw
|
155.455 | Dan now 0-4 | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Mon Feb 14 1994 09:31 | 1 |
| Dan Jansen = Buffalo Bills of skating.
|
155.456 | | METSNY::francus | Billlls in '94 | Mon Feb 14 1994 10:29 | 3 |
| US skiers finished 2-3 in the Combined Alpine event.
The Crazy Met
|
155.457 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 14 1994 10:36 | 10 |
| >US skiers finished 2-3 in the Combined Alpine event.
>
>The Crazy Met
You're supposed to use a form-feed..... 8^)
Personally, today I don't care, since I'll be at drill tonight and will
miss the coverage, but there might be some folks who don't want to know
right away.....
|
155.458 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Mon Feb 14 1994 10:55 | 8 |
|
How about we seperate this note into two notes. One is for results
which people can NEXT/UNSEEN, and one for discussions like how many
microseconds you lose for every extra second of air time in the alpine
skiing event.
Marc
|
155.459 | sheesh | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Feb 14 1994 11:04 | 8 |
| HAHAHA, good one Marc. Air time indeed.. Well I guess with the downhill
gold being won by .04 sec. anythang can affect it.
"Well look at Sven Cahoots on thwe upper part of the course, going
through that hairpin turn, his head lifted .000000000011 CM off center
that could mean the difference between gold and plastic..."
MikeL
|
155.460 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 14 1994 11:05 | 16 |
| > How about we seperate this note into two notes. One is for results
> which people can NEXT/UNSEEN, and one for discussions like how many
> microseconds you lose for every extra second of air time in the alpine
> skiing event.
>
> Marc
I think it's Topic 159 -- I just entered it.
This topic is for discussing things like micro-secods and air time and
how they get in those skin tight suits.....
86)
|
155.461 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 14 1994 11:07 | 18 |
| > "Well look at Sven Cahoots on thwe upper part of the course, going
> through that hairpin turn, his head lifted .000000000011 CM off center
> that could mean the difference between gold and plastic..."
You go ahead and laugh you silly Potato-Eater you!
On a serious note, with drugs banned, the advantages are becoming increasingly
more dependent on technology.
I remember seeing a thing during the Summer 'pics in 1992 on usings computer
modeling etc to help marathon runners with their form, to convert all of
their energy from bad form things to positive stuff.
I'll bet the skiers do the same thing.....
'Saw
|
155.462 | Go Aamodt go! | HANNAH::ASHE | Don't ask me, I'm just the adviser | Mon Feb 14 1994 11:41 | 1 |
| Moe cost me 2 points in my Olympic Rotisserie standings....
|
155.464 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Mon Feb 14 1994 15:46 | 41 |
| Friends,
Tired of always losing that golf match to the guy who seems only to shoot in
the low 80s when he's YOUR opponent???
Tired of always losing in straight sets to that one tennis partner??
Tired of always losing to the guy who bowl 200+ games???
Well, if you are, call us:
"The Tonya Harding Center for Opponent Neutralization"
Here at the center, we offer affordable ways to temporarily disable, injure,
maim or even dispose of that annoying opponent who always seems to do just one
better than you. Check our prices:
A simple whack on the knee, $99.95, or better yet, save and get baseball bats
to both of their knees for $149.95.
A kick to the groin(for male opponents only), just $9.95.
Impailment on a sharp object, in a public place, just $799.95.
If you act fast, you get this wonderful souvenir collapsible baton, just like
the one used against Nancy Kerrigan as a free gift, AND it's autographed by
Tonya herself.
And, place your order on a Thursday and receive our special rates, buy one act
of injury at full price, receive the second act at 50% off.
Our operators are standing by right now at 1-900-JUST-WIN.
And as a special gift for the first 50 callers in the next hour, we have for
you the Lorena Bobbitt Home Castration Kit.
Call Now!!
|
155.465 | | HANNAH::ASHE | It's a nice day for - cardigan's... | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:04 | 7 |
| Spoiler based on .465 spoiler
I heard the Russian team came together 2-3 weeks ago. A lot went
to the NHL (imagine at one point they had a line of Mogilny, Bure
and Federov). No Red Army to train together. Russia vs Unified team.
All those things add up...
|
155.466 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:04 | 26 |
| That's funny.
Here's a big surprise. I'm home watching the Russian Fin hockey game on TNT.
If you don't want to know what's happening, don't look past the spoiler
warning.
By the way, TNT coverage is better than CBS coverage, more sports, no stories
about blind mothers, dead sisters, paraplegic aunts, heart breaking road kill
and the rest of the trash that CBS shovels at us between coverage of hockey and
figure skating.
George
The Fins are killing Team Russia 5-0 with 6 min to go in the 3rd period. The
Russians have never been shut out in Olympic competition but it could happen
here.
The announcers claim that the Russian team is no longer what it once was
because of players lost to the NHL and the Fins, who are usually a team of
individuals, are playing like a team.
If this holds up, it will be quite the upset.
George
|
155.467 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:08 | 6 |
|
warning
actually the Fins were favored to win the game
The Crazy Met
|
155.468 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:13 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 155.467 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>
>actually the Fins were favored to win the game
Well, the announcers are saying
That the Fin's 5-0 win was an upset.
George
|
155.469 | Olympic Update from correspondent Dave Barry | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:16 | 77 |
| <<< HYDRA::DISK_NOTES$LIBRARY:[000000]DAVE_BARRY.NOTE;1 >>>
-< Dave Barry - Noted humorist >-
================================================================================
Note 856.0 Norway fine Olympic host, but it's cold No replies
ROCKER::KNOX "Rock'n'Roll Refugee" 71 lines 11-FEB-1994 13:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( Reprinted without permission from the Colorado Springs )
( Gazette & Telegraph, Friday, Feb. 11, 1994 )
Dave Barry, syndicated humor columnist and winner of the Pulitzer
Prize in Commentary in 1988, is covering the Winter Olympics for
10 days from Lillehammer, Norway.
LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- I have located Norway. It turns out to be right
next to, but different from, Sweden. Also, I'm pretty sure that Finland
is around here someplace.
Getting here was not easy. My flight from New York to Oslo sat on the
ground at Kennedy airport for THREE AND A HALF HOURS while the pilot
came up with a series of increasingly lame excuses for the delay: he was
waiting for connecting passengers; the dog ate his flight plan; vandals
had stolen the landing gear, etc. I believe that the pilot was actually
stalling because he didn't know for sure where Norway was. I bet that,
between announcements, he and his flight crew were frantically thumbing
through volume "N" of the World Book Encyclopedia, looking for the
Norway section. ("Here it is!, It's an inert gas!" "No, you idiot!
That's 'nitrogen'!")
But eventually they figured it out, and we took off and found Norway,
which is a darned good thing because the U.S. bobsled team was on our
flight. Most of the team members were large muscular individuals.
You need to be big and strong for this event, becasue at the beginning
of the bobsled run you have to push the sled hard and get it going very
fast, and then, just as the sled starts hurtling down the steep, icy,
treacherous track at speeds upwards of 80 mph, you have to -- in one
smooth, fluid motion -- let go of the sled and fall down.
At least that's what I would do. The team members, however, actually
get INTO the sled, where they are jammed together in a tiny,
uncomfortable space, very similar to the seat I occupied during the
247-hour flight from New York to Oslo, except without the beverage-cart
service.
Speaking of which, I noted that one of the bobsled team members had
several rum drinks. I pointed this out to veteran sportswriter Dave
Kindred.
"It's OK," Kindred said. "He doesn't have to steer."
Anyway, we finally arrived in Norway. It's a Nordic country, defined,
technically, as "a country where they have a funny little diagonal line
going through the letter 'o.'" Not counting reindeer and fish, Norway's
population is very small. I probably met most of the residents right at
the airport, and they all seemed very nice. They also spoke excellent
English, a fact that makes Norway seem quite foreign to me, inasmuch as
I live in Miami.
As for the country itself, if I were to descibe it in one word, that
word would be "cold." There is snow all over the place. I don't wish to
be critical of the Olympics Committee, but in my opinion, when you're
planning a major event such as the Winter Olympics, with people coming
from all over the world, it makes a lot more sense to hold it in a
warmer climate, or during the summer.
But that is water over the dam (or, as they say in Norway, "Vatter
uver da vatterholderbakker.)" We are here now, and we are going to
make the best of it. Besides, there are many exciting stories to cover,
including:
1. Tonya Harding
2. The U.S. speed skaters, and what they think about Tonya Harding
3. Norway's emergence as a modern industrial nation, and whether this
is fair to Tonya Harding.
I plan to cover all these stories and more in the days ahead. Unless
this would require me to go outside.
|
155.470 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:19 | 5 |
| bad editing there. Neon is a "noble" gas, nitrogen is not
:-)
The Crazy Met
|
155.471 | You boobs! ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:21 | 12 |
|
I really wanted to see this game tonight and be surprised, and now you
guys have gone and spoiled it for me. Nice use of the form feeds! How
about being a little more deceptive the next time, by saying that
there's an upset in progress, and that the team being upset used to be
a big Communist country that was once our Cold War enemy, but now it's
a littler Communist country that's not, maybe, sort of, we're not sure,
that's now known as (warning! team being upset by the team that speaks
Finnish as native language behind form feed):
Russia!
|
155.472 | hoist a lager for the luger | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:25 | 8 |
| Dat's OK glenn,
Watch the Beanpot instead and I won't spoil your fun by telling you
that the team from the Yahd you can Pahk your Cah in is gonna
whup those kids who play at a college from the second and third letters
in the alphabet.
MikeL
|
155.473 | | HANNAH::ASHE | It's a nice day for - cardigan's... | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:26 | 1 |
| Wasn't me...
|
155.474 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:27 | 8 |
| fwiw if the game was on TNT then it is a safe bet that CBS was not including
it as part of their coverag tonight, certainly no more than a few minutes.
TNT may not show events that CBS is using during prime time.
MikeL:
what does the Beanpot have to do with the WInter Olympics?
The Crazy Met
|
155.475 | Why it's RDB. both events held in February craze | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:28 | 1 |
|
|
155.477 | | METSNY::francus | Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:41 | 4 |
| kind of bogus anyways. some results are broadcast by the time we drive
to work in the morning. All others on the way home.
The Crazy Met
|
155.478 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:47 | 3 |
| �bad editing there. Neon is a "noble" gas, nitrogen is not
Bad reading there. He wrote "inert", not "noble".
|
155.479 | Tres Miserable | CSC32::GAULKE | | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:51 | 12 |
|
Gotta feel bad for ze french downhill skier yesterday/two days ago.
He was medal contender.
He jumped so hard out of the chute that his right ski came off.
What a way to go.
|
155.480 | | METSNY::francus | Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:54 | 5 |
| awright. nitrogen is not an inert gas. feel better Mac??
:-)
The Crazy Met
|
155.481 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 14 1994 16:59 | 1 |
| Now I know why you're in software...
|
155.482 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Feb 14 1994 17:50 | 57 |
| RE Ladies Figure Skating
One thing I've noticed about the coverage of the Karrigan / Harding story is
that the U.S. sports press seems to think that they have a lock on the gold
metal. Even Harding was quoted as saying "now I can win the Gold" when she
heard she was going.
Actually they both have a realistic shot, but in both cases it's a long shot.
Odds makers in Vagas are giving Karrigan 7-2 and Harding 12-1. At those odds,
I'd take the bet against Karrigan if I were a betting man.
There is a tier of 4 skaters that have the best chance for the gold metal.
They are defending world champion Oksana Baiul from the Ukraine, European
champion Surya Bonaly of France, Nancy Karrigan from the U.S. and a Chinese
skater (I forget her name).
Baiul really scattered the field at the 1993 World Championships to win the
gold metal. She's been a little erratic lately but she is probably the best all
around skater in the competition. The Chinese skater is probably 2nd strongest.
I believe she was 2nd in last year's championship.
Surya Bonaly of France is very strong technically but has had problems with
the artistic part of her program. Karrigan is strong in the artistic portion
but weak technically.
If any one of these skaters skates two clean programs in the short and long
competitions, they would probably win. None of them are strong enough to
overcome mistakes to overtake one of the others who skates cleaner.
Tonya Harding does have a chance, but it's a long shot. For her to win, she
has to land her "knockout punch", the triple axel, skate perfectly, and all of
the others have to make at least a few mistakes. If she skates perfectly and
doesn't do the triple axel, she won't win even if others do make mistakes, she
just isn't strong enough.
All of the women do triple jumps. A triple jump is one in which the skater
skating backwards jumps up, spins around 3 times, and lands on one foot. The
exception is the triple axel in which the skaters skating forward jumps up and
spins around 3 1/2 times landing on one foot. The Axel is the hardest of the
jumps and only a few women have done it including Ito of Japan and Harding.
The last time Harding landed the triple axel in competition was in the 1991
U.S. National championships when she beat both Karrigan and Yamaguchi. Since
then she has either not attempted or missed the jump each time she has been in
a competition. Had she landed it in the 1992 Olympics she would have won a
metal instead of finishing 4th behind Yamaguchi, Ito (of Japan) and Karrigan.
She's tried it a few times lately in practice. One of those famous "mall"
shots where she falls down is a triple axel attempt gone bad. With it she has
a shot, without it, she probably won't even get a metal.
My prediction is that the Chinese girl will win the Gold, Oksana Baiul from
the Ukraine the silver, and Karrigan will finish 3rd to end up with a 2nd bronze
to match the one she got at Albertville in 1992. Harding will stumble, "2 foot"
her triple axel and end up somewhere around 5th.
George
|
155.483 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 15 1994 08:28 | 5 |
| >
> Now I know why you're in software...
>
At least he knows his chemistry.....
|
155.484 | Two that were made for each other | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Feb 15 1994 09:00 | 9 |
| I heard on Imus that their making the Tonya Harding story and calling it
"Spunk"
Perhaps for the Duane Bobbitt story they'll call it
Shrunk
|
155.485 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 15 1994 09:51 | 2 |
| What is it with Jansen? The guy holds the world record yet can't win
an Olympic medal in 3 tries.
|
155.486 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 15 1994 09:58 | 16 |
| >
> What is it with Jansen? The guy holds the world record yet can't win
> an Olympic medal in 3 tries.
>
The Gaspipe Man.....
Some folks just cave under pressure. I mean, who was watching when he
set the worlds record? No one of any consequence. Now that we're all
watching, another choke job....
'Saw
|
155.487 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Tue Feb 15 1994 10:33 | 3 |
|
Everytime I hear Dan Jansen's name I cry because he doesn't win the
gold.
|
155.488 | Yea Jansen' got MamaCassSyndrome | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Feb 15 1994 10:55 | 1 |
|
|
155.489 | I feel sorry for that guy | FRETZ::HEISER | Government is good for you- Janet Nero | Tue Feb 15 1994 11:03 | 1 |
|
|
155.490 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Feb 15 1994 11:28 | 11 |
|
Jansen is suffering from a rare strain of
esophagus constrictus, found primarily in North East New York
and portions of the Mid West.
It is not to be taken lightly.
If contracted one time and not administered to promptly, it will
rapidly grow unchecked.
|
155.492 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 15 1994 11:52 | 6 |
|
If anyone gets to the end of the previous note, please let me know. I
gave up after ~50 returns.
Marc
|
155.493 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Tue Feb 15 1994 11:54 | 5 |
| I got there.
He wrote, "Fall, Tonya, fall"
Scott
|
155.495 | | METSNY::francus | Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse | Tue Feb 15 1994 12:05 | 5 |
| re: hockey
mia culpa. Russia was top-seeded in the tourney.
The Crazy Met
|
155.496 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Tue Feb 15 1994 12:14 | 3 |
| Do what I did... I sent the message back to Heiser....
REK
|
155.498 | | METSNY::francus | Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse | Tue Feb 15 1994 12:26 | 4 |
|
barf!
The Crazy Met
|
155.499 | No more stinking form feeds | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Digital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's all | Tue Feb 15 1994 12:28 | 4 |
| Today results have more Gold for the USA in skiing.
Womens G/S sombody like Rotwieller
|
155.500 | | METSNY::francus | Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse | Tue Feb 15 1994 12:30 | 3 |
| you tell 'em guy. kind of obnoxious, isn't it??
The Crazy Met
|
155.501 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 15 1994 12:38 | 2 |
| Well, if you guys don't want to be considerate of other folks, we could
always just set them hidden.......
|
155.503 | may the schwatrz be with youwwwwwwwwwwwww | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Feb 15 1994 12:52 | 9 |
|
>> barf!
Yabbut wasn't that the name of the guy John Candy played in
Spaceballs?????
|
155.504 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 15 1994 13:25 | 12 |
| >
> If you're going to set anything hidden please do it to those
> anti-gun control notes. At least the replies in this note have
> something to do with sports.
>
Actually, I'm not, because I forgot this isn't the form-feed note, that's
at 159 or whatever.
And don't complain about the hunting note, because we've always had
one and we've been over the hunting/guns as sports rathole zillions
of times.....
|
155.506 | But I couldn't after reading this one | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Tue Feb 15 1994 13:57 | 5 |
|
> Extract it out and edit it. At the end of all those form feeds
> it says, "Fall Tonya fall!" Try and control your laughter.
|
155.507 | Okay, announcing a gun-control subject for goods give-away.... | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 15 1994 14:24 | 26 |
| > I'm not complaining about the hunting note and you know that. Or you
> would if you were paying attention. What I find objectionable is the
> degeneration of the note into a pro/anti-gun control debate. There's
> a lively discussion of that issue over in SOAPBOX if you really care
> to discuss it in-depth and in the proper forum.
I always pay attention. (So don't be a wise-ass... 8^P)
The subject is relevant to anyone who hunts, target shoots or collects guns.
As to going to Soapbox, a lot of us don't note over there, we note here, so
if it's relevent, why move?
Finally, and candidly, I'm surprised you'd object to anything in this topic,
since you've only popped in here like three times in the entire topic.
But, because I'm such a nice guy, I'll give on this one, and we'll try
to get the gun-control debate to a minimum......
'Saw
|
155.508 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Feb 15 1994 15:06 | 15 |
|
... Oh well, since the Olympics note has turned into a gun note ...
Too bad about Dan Jansen and Duncan Kennedy. It appears that Jansen has
failed too many times to call it all bad luck, the pressure must really bother
him.
It appears that his entire family and circle of friends are really high
strung. Every time he loses the reaction is like a whole town died. If they'd
all lighten up, maybe he wouldn't get so wigged out during big matches.
They should have Tommy Moe talk to him for a while before the match. He
seems a lot more mellow.
George
|
155.509 | at this point, it's more psychological than anything else | FRETZ::HEISER | GovernmentIsGoodForYou- Janet Nero | Tue Feb 15 1994 15:08 | 3 |
| > Too bad about Dan Jansen and Duncan Kennedy. It appears that Jansen has
>failed too many times to call it all bad luck, the pressure must really bother
>him.
|
155.510 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Tue Feb 15 1994 15:53 | 6 |
| RE: Psychological and Jansen...
That's what Eric Heiden indicated. He pointed to his noggin
and said that Jansen's only obstacle would be mental.
Scott
|
155.511 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Feb 15 1994 16:14 | 13 |
|
Of course, the next two guys to go around that turn also slipped, the 2nd
went down and slid into the wall.
In '88 he was obviously distracted. In '92, he finished but he got beat. This
time the two guys after him tripped indicating an ice problem.
Maybe it's all mental but maybe he is just "snake bit". Hard to tell.
How old is he? They keep saying it's his last time, will he definitely be
over the hill in '98?
George
|
155.512 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Wed Feb 16 1994 05:54 | 5 |
| Jansen's 28. Actually I only saw one guy after him slip. I agree
with whoever said the whole family is a bundle of nerves, waiting for
something bad to happen. For the past 3 Olympics it has.
Steve
|
155.513 | the Original Chokemeister? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Feb 16 1994 08:04 | 6 |
|
Yabbut nobody's bashing William Jennings Bryant for his 0-3 record!
;^)
|
155.514 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Wed Feb 16 1994 08:39 | 4 |
| How the the Ice skating pair from Germany... SHe took a header into the
ice... FACE FIrst... OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
REK
|
155.515 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Wed Feb 16 1994 10:36 | 10 |
| This media coverage of the Tonya story has gone crazy. I heard on the radio
this morning that they were reporting what she had for lunch upon arriving in
Norway. Guess wht it was.
A CLUB sandwich.
(Ta-boom)
|
155.516 | From an article on the net... | HANNAH::ASHE | We're riding on the freeway of love... | Wed Feb 16 1994 11:55 | 1 |
| Dan Jansen: The Bill Buckner of winter sport...
|
155.517 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Wed Feb 16 1994 12:11 | 6 |
| The WIfe said that yesterday CHannel 4 cut in the regular programming
to show T_H live getting out of the car in Portland....
REK
this morning...
|
155.518 | well at least he won't loose | AD::HEATH | Have pitchers and catchers reported yet? | Wed Feb 16 1994 12:33 | 6 |
|
Just heard that choke artist Jansen has pulled out of the 1500. Guess
he couldn't handle another failure.
|
155.519 | now he's a failure *AND* a quitter | FRETZ::HEISER | GovernmentIsGoodForYou- Janet Nero | Wed Feb 16 1994 12:34 | 1 |
| well I no longer feel sorry for him then.
|
155.520 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I wonder who's watching me now - the IRS? | Wed Feb 16 1994 12:47 | 6 |
| I thought his best events were the 500 and 1000. Maybe he's preparing
for the 1000?
Harding got out of the car this morning in Portland? I thought she
was in Norway already. Did she fly back?
|
155.521 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Wed Feb 16 1994 12:59 | 5 |
| Jansen is, primarily, a sprinter. So, his events are the
500 and the 1000. I think he skates the 1500 more as a form
of training. So, it's no big deal.
Scott
|
155.522 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Wed Feb 16 1994 13:04 | 2 |
|
Jansen is a wuss. Period.
|
155.523 | what a soap | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Wed Feb 16 1994 13:49 | 12 |
| Jansen's bypassing the 1500 to conentrate on the 1000.
Imus said he was bypassing the 1500 cuz he was gonna avoid slipping
3 mo' times (3x500=1500).
This Harding thang is nutso. Gillooly sells a home video of
Tonya doing a strip tease to Mumble Trash TV; Her mom LaVona
sings a song about Tonya on Montel Williams and after fielding
some hostile questions, collapses and is hospitalized.
MikeL
|
155.524 | | SNAX::ERICKSON | 26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough loses | Wed Feb 16 1994 14:20 | 12 |
|
I may have the 5000 confused with the 1500. I thought Jansen
qualified for the 1500. However, some new guy who used to skate on roller
blades. Took up speed skating and won the 1500 in some National event.
Dan figured even though he was schedule for the 500, 1000, and 1500. He
would give this other guy his slot in the 1500. So the new guy could
experience skating in the Olympics.
So I believe Dan had already said he was not competing in the 1500
before the Olympics started. So he isn't being a wuss by not competing in
it. He was already planning on letting someone else take his spot.
Ron
|
155.525 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Wed Feb 16 1994 14:27 | 3 |
|
He is still a wuss. Period.
|
155.526 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 16 1994 14:32 | 6 |
| Why, because he didn't bump anyone as he went through the turns?
Speaking of which, do they still do that speed skating free for all
where instead of heats of 2 skaters they put everyone on the starting
line? I think I remember seeing this in the last winter games. It
might have been just a demonstration sport.
|
155.528 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Pay me $32mil to spew | Wed Feb 16 1994 15:49 | 11 |
| I was watching the local CBS affiliate this morning, and they showed
that there are 4 media personel for every 1 (one) athlete. Can you
beleive this?
What cracked me up, is the weather guy from CBS morning show was over
at the Olympics. What a waist of $$$. Of course those expenses get
back to us the consumer. The charge for advertizing goes up to cover
the expenses of sending this waste of overhead to Norway, which
means product price increases.
Tim
|
155.529 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Wed Feb 16 1994 16:12 | 1 |
| Janson=Buffalo ... 4 in a row
|
155.530 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Wed Feb 16 1994 18:01 | 20 |
| Figure skating's got to be a legitimate sport because Scott Hamil
said it was dangerous. Isn't that one of the defining characteristics?
All kidding aside, the athleticism required by world-class pairs skaters
is awesome. And after watching the little German skater belly
flop on the ice, the bit about it being dangerous is gaining some
credibility, too. Can you imagine what it must be like to be dropped
on the ice from 8 or so feet up? The ladies that skate with a
partner have got to be tough to compete at the olympic level, and
you know that they take some headers during practice.
So, I guess that puts me in the camp that consider figure skating a
sport. And I even enjoy watching it (sometimes). I don't know
what anyone else's criteria are for determing whether or not an
activity is a sport, but I just don't see that figure skating doesn't
qualify.
To each his own.
Jerry
|
155.531 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Thu Feb 17 1994 08:34 | 5 |
| Scott Hamilton
From Bowling Green, Ohio.
Scott
|
155.532 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Feb 17 1994 08:41 | 7 |
|
Rocky Balboa
From Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Terry
|
155.533 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 17 1994 08:50 | 3 |
|
Yo, Adrian!
|
155.534 | I'd rather watch Bravo or clear the toilet bowl | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Feb 17 1994 09:07 | 22 |
|
Yabbut I really screwed up lasted night! I accidentally surf
landed onto CBS and made the mistake of staying there for ~10 minutes.
Can somebody tell me what the hell that little story about the old
folks whose house was over the blasting area for the skating rink had
to do with anything????????
Man, this stinks! If they wanted to show that crap, why not put it on
Peoples Magazine or some other crap show?
Sorry, CBS but with my disguist about the knee-whack coverage and now
this, I'm boycotting. As a matter of fact, I may erase CBS from the
tee vee channel memory!
Blecch!
I remain,
also planning *NOT* to buy Tonya's Playboy issue
Kev
|
155.535 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 17 1994 09:30 | 27 |
| CBS is caught, I think, between a rock and a hard spot.
They're trying to do two things at once and failing miserably. They're
trying to pander to the non-sporting public, who'll watch for the
"spectacle" while providing sports coverage to the people who are watching
for the sports.
I'm disappointed too.
The "fluff" pieces on the athletes, are, in some cases, interesting, as it
is kind of cool to see how other athletes from other countries prepare
etc. But then you run into a time constraint, where you can't show enough
of the competition.
Certain things they show, I'd always enjoy. I love the way Charles Kuralt
can turn a phrase, and do a voice-over footage of snowy mountains or the
Aurora Borealis. If they kept the fluff to his 5 minutes at the end of the
broadcast that would be fine.
But I want to see more of the competition.
I'm going to write CBS a letter and tell them what I think. It might
not make much difference in anything, but it'll make me feel better.....
'Saw
|
155.536 | Maybe if we were an Arctic country... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Thu Feb 17 1994 09:45 | 13 |
|
> But I want to see more of the competition.
I think there's just not even enough competition there to fill 3 hours
a night for three solid weeks. Interesting competition, at least.
Maybe if you're the hardcore Olympics fan and really do want to see
several hours of uncut biathlon competition or free-style skiing it's
possible. I know I still wouldn't watch. I'm not complaining; there
are still other networks in operation during this period, some of them
even televising sports...
glenn
|
155.537 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 17 1994 09:50 | 23 |
| > I think there's just not even enough competition there to fill 3 hours
> a night for three solid weeks. Interesting competition, at least.
> Maybe if you're the hardcore Olympics fan and really do want to see
> several hours of uncut biathlon competition or free-style skiing it's
> possible. I know I still wouldn't watch. I'm not complaining; there
> are still other networks in operation during this period, some of them
> even televising sports...
I wouldn't mind seeing a live hockey game, or some of the x-country skiing.
Not uncut perhaps, but more than what we're seeing.
Hell, I'd even be happy if we didn't always get the insipid "how are you
feeling, now that you've won gold" questions.
I wish I could win a gold in something, because when they asked me that
question, I'd answer, "Why, you a__hole, I'm so f___ing happy I could
just s___ my drawers!"
I mean, come on......
'Saw
|
155.538 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Thu Feb 17 1994 09:51 | 6 |
| Another problem (or maybe another slant on the problem) is that CBS feels
that they need something for the audience of the shows they replace. They're
not replacing tractor-pulls, they are replacing sitcoms and nighttime soaps.
They put the fluff in to appease the "Knotts Landing" crowd.
=Bob=
|
155.539 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 17 1994 09:55 | 30 |
| The problem of fluff in the CBS Olympics coverage is the continuation of
the controversy that started two years ago at Albertville.
After losing money the last couple times around, ABC bid low and lost the
1992 Olympics to CBS. The 1st week of coverage by CBS was pretty bad. Not only
were there production problems but they flooded their coverage with fluff
about the personal lives of the athletes inspired largely by the ratings pulled
by ABC in Calgary in 1988 with their coverage of the death of Dan Jansen's
sister.
The calls poured in complaining about the fluff and at the end of week 1 of
1992 CBS promised more sports coverage. Of courses more popular sports were
scheduled so it was no real problem.
Now the controversy has started up again. The Boston Globe reported a couple
days ago that calls to the Globe, Boston Ch 7 (the CBS affiliate) and to CBS
sports were once again pouring in complaining about the coverage but this time
the producers at CBS answered that they were going use their proven formula
that is aimed at more than a sports audience. They went on to say that it was
their $295 million dollars.
But there is an alternative for U.S. sports fans. TNT has coverage during the
day time that is much more sports oriented. They are not allowed to show any
competition that CBS wants to show later in the evening, but CBS reserves so
little that there is plenty for them to show. TNT can also show anything they
want the day following the CBS coverage.
So if it's driving you nuts, set up your VCRs and tape TNT.
George
|
155.540 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 10:08 | 4 |
|
�But I want to see more of the competition.
But isn't there more to the Olympics than just the competition?
|
155.541 | on the news | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Feb 17 1994 10:28 | 22 |
|
Yabbut here's a highlight of today's news
Thisted morning was the first meeting between Tonya and Nancy.
They met on da ice (practice session, doncha know) and Tonya skated
over to Nancy, put her arm on Nancy's shoulder and whispered
"hey, I got this covered....I have the room numbers of all the
other skaters."
da da Boom!
;^)
|
155.542 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 17 1994 10:41 | 10 |
| |�But I want to see more of the competition.
|
| But isn't there more to the Olympics than just the competition?
|
Sure, but I get tired of seeing fluff pieces on some free-style skier who
sky-dives, even if she is cute.
CBS is trying to please everyone, and we all know that don't work......
|
155.543 | majority | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:03 | 4 |
| Saw,
Maybe they are pleasing the majority by showing more fluff????
|
155.544 | CBS thinks all Americans are only interested in how Americans do...WRONG! | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:09 | 11 |
| > Saw,
> Maybe they are pleasing the majority by showing more fluff????
Maybe Frank but I find it hard to believe that's what the majority
wants when the biggest sports nuts in the country are well reprensented
in here and I haven't heard one person in here say he or she enjoys
the fluff.........
mike
|
155.545 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:14 | 5 |
| � Maybe Frank but I find it hard to believe that's what the majority
� wants when the biggest sports nuts in the country are well reprensented
� in here
Do you really think the majority of CBS viewers are sports nuts?
|
155.546 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:23 | 11 |
| > Do you really think the majority of CBS viewers are sports nuts?
Probably not.
But, CBS cannot ignore the fact that their Sports department is seriously
hurting, and they can't afford to alienate any of their sports viewers.
Bottom line, they're showing a lot of fluff, and even a non-sports-nut
has to see how insipid some of the questions are.....
Are you enjoying the coverage Mac?
|
155.547 | Olympiads from Europe = bad TV | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:24 | 10 |
| RE: CBS Coverage
It really makes you wonder why the networks would ever want to bid
heavily for Olympiads that don't have live prime-time coverage.
The 1996 Summer Games in Hotlanta should be a great TV event because
everything will be live in the Eastern prime time zone.
LA 1984 was the best with the regular evening telecasts going to about
12:30 every night(9:30 LA).
|
155.548 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:29 | 4 |
|
At the last 'pics the same issues were raised, No ?
|
155.549 | | METSNY::francus | Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:31 | 9 |
| CBS is getting phenomenal ratings this week. Imagine what they
will get next week with the Women Figure Skating. As long as they
are getting these ratings they will stick to their formula.
200 reporters and 150 security personnel were on hand for the
practice skating session that Harding and Kerrigan were at. absurd.
Oh yeah there were a few other skaters as well.
The Crazy Met
|
155.550 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:52 | 10 |
| �But, CBS cannot ignore the fact that their Sports department is seriously
�hurting, and they can't afford to alienate any of their sports viewers.
Why not? Do you think that if they do a sports nut oriented Olympics
that folks will still tune into CBS on Sundays in the fall?
�Are you enjoying the coverage Mac?
Haven't watched much. My life doesn't revolve around the winter
olympics.
|
155.551 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 11:55 | 9 |
| �200 reporters and 150 security personnel were on hand for the
�practice skating session that Harding and Kerrigan were at. absurd.
How many countries are participating this year? Are there fewer than
200?
If someone else decided that wanted to be like Gilooly, people would be
wondering why there weren't personal body guards for each skater and
why there wasn't a SWAT team postioned at each entrance to the rink.
|
155.552 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 17 1994 12:21 | 22 |
| |�But, CBS cannot ignore the fact that their Sports department is seriously
|�hurting, and they can't afford to alienate any of their sports viewers.
|
| Why not? Do you think that if they do a sports nut oriented Olympics
| that folks will still tune into CBS on Sundays in the fall?
Nobody will be tuning into CBS on Sundays this fall for anything.
But the fact remains that CBS sports is hurting and they can't afford
to alienate anyone.
The people they attract with the fluff certainly won't be watching
much other CBS sports.....
My life doesn't revolve around the 'pics either, but the coverage I've
seen is mostly fluff, filled with insipid questions that a reasonably
intelligent reporter for a high school paper wouldn't even ask.....
'Saw
|
155.553 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Thu Feb 17 1994 12:26 | 10 |
| <<< Note 155.534 by CSTEAM::FARLEY >>>
> Sorry, CBS but with my disguist about the knee-whack coverage and now
> this, I'm boycotting. As a matter of fact, I may erase CBS from the
> tee vee channel memory!
I'm sure all the CBS folks reading this conference will be disappointed
to hear this.
Mark.
|
155.554 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 17 1994 12:31 | 10 |
| >
> I'm sure all the CBS folks reading this conference will be disappointed
> to hear this.
>
Hey, you never know who knows somebody else. I used to work with a guy
that was pretty good friends with some folks at CBS Sports.....
'Saw
|
155.555 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 12:36 | 16 |
| �But the fact remains that CBS sports is hurting and they can't afford
�to alienate anyone.
�The people they attract with the fluff certainly won't be watching
�much other CBS sports.....
Someone has already pointed out that the ratings are quite good, so
somebody is watching them. They obviously haven't alienated everyone.
As far as alienation goes, they've already alienated one of their
biggest sports audiences -- the football fan. What else do they have
to lose?
What other CBS sports are there? Do you really think a piece about
someone's mom is going to make a college basketball fan stop watching
CBS coverage of college hoops? Or that a golf fan is going to give up
on the network in disgust and pass on next year's Skins game?
|
155.556 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Thu Feb 17 1994 12:37 | 9 |
| These are the first Olympic Games of which I know one of the
participants. Kriste Porter, a metal contender for the women's
free-style ski team, is the daughter of my dentist out of Greenland NH. I
had a chance to meet her a couple of years ago in Portsmouth at a
her father's office.
Porter is currently ranked 2nd in the US and 4th in the world.
Mark.
|
155.557 | | WKRP::LEETCH | U.S. Messaging Practice, Cincinnati | Thu Feb 17 1994 12:39 | 17 |
| Doing my monthly check-in on this file...
�CBS is getting phenomenal ratings this week. Imagine what they
�will get next week with the Women Figure Skating.
I don't think CBS is trying to get the sport-nut viewers (a small audience when
dealing with prime-time viewers).
They are going after people like my wife who usually doesn't give a rats-ass
about sports but has enjoyed watching the Winter Games, probably because the
fluff-to-sports ratio has been high.
Getting people like her to watch is much more important than serious sports
addicts like me who has been known to watch bass fishing on ESPN at 2:00 AM
(while rocking the baby to sleep of course).
Bruce
|
155.558 | | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Thu Feb 17 1994 12:42 | 17 |
|
� Maybe Frank but I find it hard to believe that's what the majority
� wants when the biggest sports nuts in the country are well reprensented
� in here
>>> Do you really think the majority of CBS viewers are sports nuts?
The majority of the ones tuned into the olympics, YES. Sure there
are those who are casual sports viewers who are tuning because it's
the olympics. national pride and all that. The ones that these fluff
pieces are designed to attract. CBS my guess is realize that sports
fans will sit through the crap for a taste of real sports action as
opposed to say watching KNOTS LANDING.......
mike
|
155.559 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:02 | 12 |
| Well I've got bad news and I've got good news. The bad news is that I'm sick.
Yuck, I hate to be sick. The good news is that I'm home and in about 2 minutes
the 1994 Winter Olympics will be coming on TV. Armed with my new understanding
of icing and offsides (thanks to this file) I'll probably get to see 1 complete
hockey game followed by all the competition that we missed yesterday because
CBS was covering moose, sick inlaws, battling skaters, and the rest.
TNT guys, stop complaining about CBS, set up your VCR's and watch it on
TNT. It's all there.
It's enough to make you start liking Ted and Jane,
George
|
155.560 | I want some stuff, not fluff | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:02 | 30 |
| >>> Do you really think the majority of CBS viewers are sports nuts?
Yes!
I know the week started bad for me. I love the Luge, I'd watch it all
day. Sunday night CBS was hyping the luge as part of their coverage. What
did we see? A 15 minute piece on the Duncan Kennedy incident in Germany a
while back. A few shots of practice runs, maybe at Norway, maybe not. Then
a list of standings for the day. I don't think they showed one run in it's
entirety even. Plus the piece on Kennedy was a rehash of a piece that CBS
had aired before the Olympics.
Wouldn't bother me as much if CBS wouldn't make statements like:
"We just don't have the time to show all the events.". The skydiving piece
was priceless too. I'm sure glad we got to see that instead of 5 minutes worth
of X-country skiing or the like. Then there was the 15 minute piece on the
mens upcoming event. Joy O' Joy, there's Brian Botano's last performance in
the 88 Olympics in it's entirety. Ooops, don't want to piss our boy Scotty
off, let's show his performance in 84 too. PUUHHHHLLLEEEAAASSSEEEE!
I'd change the channels, but my wife has threatened removal of parts I
don't want removed. I must admit, she likes the fluff, and I don't get it.
re: X-country skiing. I'm nuts, I'd love to watch the entire 30Km
event. But then again, I watch the Boston Marathon from stem to stern too.
At the very least, show the start, a few minutes of the pack at different times
in the race, a crash or two, and the top five finishers. You could do an
interesting piece that wouldn't take more than 10 minute of air time.
Zamboni
|
155.561 | Hey folks the fluff has a reason | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Digital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's all | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:05 | 9 |
| My wife who never will even turn on any sports type show is watching the
Olympics with me every night. She is really getting PO'ed when I surf over
to ESPN to watch hoops when the fluff drivel begins.
The morning coverage isn't great but you have to admit that the Paula Zahn's
and Harry what his name are pretty enthusiastic to get the chance to talk
about something other than the crappy east coast weather and how tough the
commute is into the New York studio.
Jeff
|
155.562 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:07 | 13 |
| �>>> Do you really think the majority of CBS viewers are sports nuts?
�
� Yes!
And what brings you to this conclusion? The fact that networks usually
lose money covering events like this? If there were that many sports
nuts they should be making money hand over fist. That they go after
these events more for the prestige and the chance to promo their
regular lineup?
I see we finally have somebody coming clean to say they watch the race
looking for the crashes. Now if the motor sports and hockey fans would
start coming clean...
|
155.563 | TNT not much better... | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:07 | 7 |
| I watched Monday.
It was a hockey game that I didn't care about, and the rest was exactly
what CBS had shown the night before. I wasn't impressed. Maybe I caught
them on an off day.
t
|
155.564 | | MKFSA::LONG | 6 more months and he's all yours | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:08 | 7 |
| >> It's enough to make you start liking Ted and Jane,
Could care less about Ted, but "I'm_not_fonda" Jane...no way, no how
not a freaking chance!
billl
|
155.565 | Fluff | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:14 | 27 |
| >�>>> Do you really think the majority of CBS viewers are sports nuts?
>�
>� Yes!
>
> And what brings you to this conclusion?
Based strictly on the people I know who say they are watching. All
are complaining about the fluff. My wife, who likes it, will admit that there's
a bit much, and the skating coverage is over covered. Not looking at financials
at all.
>The fact that networks usually
> lose money covering events like this?
If they didn't have so many people over there doing fluff, they
probably wouldn't be need so much. David Letterman said $40k a day for
his mom and her crew. I'm sure that's inflated, but probably not terribly
so. Times that by all the CBS sports crew.
I realize money talks, and the rest walks. Probably their reason
for the fluff. It just seems to be that 2/3rds+ is fluff. I'd be happy
at around 50%, and they'd probably have the same ratings.
Crashes are Cool! Especially in X-country with minor injuries and
great powder shots.
Zamboni
|
155.566 | schlep me! | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:28 | 15 |
|
>> Now if the motor sports and hockey fans would
start coming clean...
yabbut Mac, you implying that -TH, Saw and /don are in need of a
bath and a good deoderant??????
I remain,
seeing the pot calling the kettle again!
;^)
Kev
|
155.567 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 17 1994 13:59 | 6 |
|
YES!!! YES!!! Team U.S.A. v. Canada LIVE coming up in a few minutes.
Thank you Ted.
George
|
155.568 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:10 | 5 |
| > looking for the crashes. Now if the motor sports and hockey fans would
> start coming clean...
Lemme guess, Mac. You play rugby because you like the shorts, right?
|
155.569 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:13 | 6 |
| � Crashes are Cool! Especially in X-country with minor injuries and
�great powder shots.
I can't picture much powder being kicked up by a cross country skiier
crashing. Downhill yes, cross country, no. Maybe I just don't go fast
enough.
|
155.570 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | TonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkank | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:17 | 5 |
| Anybody who watches these idiots frolic in the snows of Norway when
they could be watching Sports Illustrated models frolic in bikinis deserve
what they get!
/Don
|
155.572 | | GIAMEM::SCHOTT | | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:46 | 12 |
| re: .569
World Class X-C Racers often hit speeds in excess of 45 mph on
the downhill portions of the courses they run. While this doesn't
approach the 80 mph that a DH racer achieves, its still remarkable
when one considers the toe only connection of the boot to ski, the skinny
skis, the lack of a helmet, and the fact they may have already skied
47.5 kilometers of a 50k race, and be well into oxygen debt. To put
this in further perspective, the average recreational skier at your local
ski area rarely gets the opportunity to achieve speeds of 25 to 30 mph.
Russ
|
155.573 | | METSNY::francus | Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:47 | 4 |
| hmm, I thought TNT wouldn't show USA-Canada since CBS was showing
chunks of it tonight.
The Crazy Met
|
155.574 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:51 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 155.573 by METSNY::francus "Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse" >>>
>hmm, I thought TNT wouldn't show USA-Canada since CBS was showing
>chunks of it tonight.
They just showed the whole 1st period live. I think part of the CBS
TNT deal has to do with TNT owning hockey, especially before the medal
round. I imagine CBS will have the gold medal game.
TNT is doing a filler piece now, but at least they are talking about
the hockey background of one of the Team Canada players. He also plays
for Maine University.
George
|
155.575 | Details, please | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bruno Kirby: Cop on the Edge | Thu Feb 17 1994 14:52 | 1 |
| So what's the score????????????????????
|
155.576 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 15:06 | 5 |
| �To put
� this in further perspective, the average recreational skier at your local
� ski area rarely gets the opportunity to achieve speeds of 25 to 30 mph.
Like I said, I'm probably not going fast enough.
|
155.577 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 17 1994 15:07 | 4 |
| � So what's the score????????????????????
My esteemed co-moderator has kindly set up a separate Olympic
Scoreboard topic. Please check your local listings for more detail.
|
155.578 | Political correctness roolz!!! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bruno Kirby: Cop on the Edge | Thu Feb 17 1994 15:12 | 5 |
| Thank you kindly for providing me with that information in a timely
and pleasant manner.
NAZZ
|
155.579 | | ZEKE::SAIA | R.I.P. AMA/CCS #235 | Fri Feb 18 1994 09:17 | 14 |
|
How about that Bodine sled ? Gold old USA technology at work developed
with the NASCAR chassis boys. Looks like they have a real screamer.
Fully adjustable chassis, data ack stuff on board, IBM doing all the
computer work. God, I love those IBM marketing guys.
The Europeans are running for cover, and I think they will be really
pissed if these guys medal.
Another feature of racing improving the breed. Go get em, and don't let
that wuss Dan ("the ice sure is slippery") Jansen near it.
Later
|
155.580 | | MKFSA::LONG | I been to Rock-and-Roll-Heaven, Oregon | Fri Feb 18 1994 11:58 | 4 |
| When is the bobsled, both 2 and 4 man, supposed to start?
billl
|
155.581 | | LUDWIG::GARRY | Dallas Cowboys back where they belong #1 | Fri Feb 18 1994 14:50 | 6 |
| What is wrong with the Russian hockey team this year,they got beat
again today,it looks like they may miss the medals round for the
first time.
Tom
|
155.582 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Feb 18 1994 15:20 | 19 |
| RE Bobsleads
The Bobsled schedule is as follows:
Saturday Feb 19, 2 Man Sleds
Sunday Feb 20, 2 Man-finals
Saturday Feb 26, 4 Man Sleds
Sunday Feb 27, 4 Man finals
RE What happened to the Russian Team?
The NHL.
By the way TNT reported that there is a problem with the money paid to the
Russian hockey clubs as compensation for the Russian players playing in the
NHL. It seems that the money is disappearing. Some are saying into Swiss bank
accounts and some are saying that the Russian Mafia is involved.
George
|
155.583 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I'm on a mexican (whoa) radio... | Fri Feb 18 1994 15:30 | 5 |
| There is no Red Army team anymore. If there was, you'd still have a
team with a line like Bure, Federov and Mogilny. The team was put
together a few weeks ago. They have less experience together than
the US team.
|
155.584 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Fri Feb 18 1994 15:43 | 4 |
| > There is no Red Army team anymore. If there was, you'd still have a
must've been someone else posing as them that played the Roadrunners
here this week.
|
155.585 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Feb 18 1994 15:53 | 14 |
| Is it the same all over or what.
What I mean is, the local newscasts all started off yesterday with the
"story" that Nancy K. and Tonya H. skated at the same time on the ice
without any incidents. WTF did they expect, Tonya to show up with a
9mm to finish off Nancy, or Nancy to show up wif a hokey stick, knife
attached to the end, for revenge.
I'm sick of the freakin' "story". The damned newspapers all have these
pictures of the two passing on the ice........Chripes sake, let the
f__king thing go, eh!!
JaKe
|
155.586 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | TonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkank | Fri Feb 18 1994 16:00 | 4 |
| I think the Russians miss Communism. I do too. It's like when
'rasslin turns a bad guy good.
/Don
|
155.587 | | MKFSA::LONG | and you know they got a helluva band! | Fri Feb 18 1994 16:00 | 10 |
|
>> I'm sick of the freakin' "story". The damned newspapers all have these
>> pictures of the two passing on the ice........Chripes sake, let the
>> f__king thing go, eh!!
You mean like Mac letting go of the "Pittsburgh fans unable to get
over Bonds leaving" tripe? Fat chance!!!
billl
|
155.588 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 18 1994 16:15 | 3 |
| Hey billlllllllllllllll, sounds like a great idea for a contest. Let's
predict who we'll hear the last from -- Pittsburghers complaing about
Barry Bonds or the media doing another piece on Kerrigan/Harding.
|
155.589 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | | Fri Feb 18 1994 16:17 | 4 |
| Do all of us, MAC, and yerself too.
JaKe
|
155.590 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I'm on a mexican (whoa) radio... | Fri Feb 18 1994 16:39 | 2 |
| Mike,
I thought that was the Moscow Penguins, the Penguins "farm" team.
|
155.591 | | KALI::MORGAN | | Fri Feb 18 1994 17:24 | 9 |
| So the Russians had a bunch of players go to the NHL. Big Deal. The
Canadiens have a lot of players there as well, as does the US. If I
remember correctly, the breakdown is something like:
Canadiens - 320
US - 90
Russians - 60
Steve
|
155.592 | | HANNAH::ASHE | I melt with you | Fri Feb 18 1994 17:36 | 2 |
| Which is the makings for the NHL's version of Dream Team '98...
|
155.593 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Feb 18 1994 21:18 | 14 |
| The TNT announcers mentioned another reason for the Russians losing players.
It seems that the players on the Russian clubs have to live at their camp 8
months of the year only seeing their families on weekends. Because of this, not
only are they losing their best guys to the NHL, but with the lack of travel
restrictions, guys are leaving to play in the minors and for clubs in other
leagues in North America and Europe.
Anyway, being sick at home I got to see 2 full days of coverage on TNT. What
a difference, lots of luge, the ski jump half of the Nordic combined, the
Russian German hockey game, and no fluff to speak of. They're doing a fine job.
Well, back to CBS, TNT is off until Tuesday,
George
|
155.595 | | HANNAH::ASHE | We're through being cool | Mon Feb 21 1994 11:32 | 2 |
| How about that wink?
|
155.596 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 21 1994 11:50 | 3 |
| Actually, I kind of enjoyed the Bill Geist spoof of Ice Dancing...
That was about all I enjoyed....8^)
|
155.598 | Bolero - wasn't that a dumb Bo Derek movie??? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Mon Feb 21 1994 11:56 | 0 |
155.599 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:03 | 6 |
|
> Hardly the 1st exaduration by a sports announcer,
^^^^^^^^^^^
You ought to (tm) that baby, George.....
|
155.600 | Ski Jumping a sport that requires large "FILBERTS" | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Digital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's all | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:06 | 8 |
| I have to admit that Ski Jumping has to be one of the top sports for men/women
with very large filberts. The camera angles are excellent showing just how
it looks to the competitor and just how close to a controlled fall these
guys are.
The crowd noise was phenominal.
Jeff
|
155.601 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:38 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 155.598 by CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH "Lindsey is four years old!!!!" >>>
> -< Bolero - wasn't that a dumb Bo Derek movie??? >-
No, the movie was "10". The Bolero was the music that Bo put on while
seducing Dudley More.
Torvel and Dean used the same music for their free program in the 1984
Olympics. It was a very artistic and skillful program which revolutionized Ice
dancing and helped them win the Gold metal. They got perfect 6.0's for artistic
impression.
George
|
155.602 | | DYPSS1::ROPER | Take a Sad Song and Make it Better | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:47 | 10 |
| > -< Bolero - wasn't that a dumb Bo Derek movie??? >-
>> No, the movie was "10". The Bolero was the music that Bo put on while
>>seducing Dudley More.
Bo Derek also was in a movie called "Bolero".
- Rope
|
155.603 | Filberts or Buckeyes? | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Mon Feb 21 1994 12:56 | 1 |
|
|
155.604 | Possibly the worst movie ever made - "10" was Oscar material in comparison | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Mon Feb 21 1994 13:04 | 2 |
| Uhh, yes Bo was in a movie called Bolero - I knew that becasue I was one of 73
people in the United States that paid cash money to see it
|
155.605 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Mon Feb 21 1994 14:05 | 5 |
| >> Bo was in the movie called Bolero- in a movie called "10"
..and her husband was in a movie called "The Ten Commandments"
He's old!
|
155.606 | Or "Havlicek stole the ball!!!" | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Feb 21 1994 14:06 | 3 |
| George,
I hope you're not comparing the Moon Landing with the Bobby
Thompson homerun....?
|
155.608 | ITALY vs USA? | AIMHI::SMILLER | | Mon Feb 21 1994 14:19 | 6 |
|
anybody have any updates on todays hockey game between Italy and the
USA???????
s<
|
155.609 | | AIMHI::SMILLER | | Mon Feb 21 1994 14:23 | 5 |
|
Forget it, I found the note !
Steve
|
155.611 | Bobbobobsledders go bobbobbobbing along.. | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Mon Feb 21 1994 14:29 | 22 |
| Coupla bobsled tidbits
Jamaican bobsled team was disqualified for "cheating".. Seems like
one of the Jamaicans was a few pounds too heavy.. :"Now pushing off
for Jamaica is Nate Newton."...
A leetle brouhouha is developing on the relative success, or lack of,
of the American bobsled team and :"da Sled".. Mixed reviews on the
Bodine product. Some complain that the US tried to make the Bodine
project a two-year rush job instead of a four year cycle.. what the
hail do these USOC apologists work for us?? Sheeeoot, the US
underachieves and the product is immature. What about the bobsledders?
In an ironic sideshow, one of the bobsledders (Stimer?) tried to have
his pardner booted off the squad for his lack of committment and
"partying too much". USOC didn't pursue the allegations, reportedly
corroborrated, becuase it was fearful of repercussions ( hello
Tonya? can I retain your barristers?).
USOC is quickly resembling the eunuchs of ancient kingdoms..
MikeL
|
155.612 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Mon Feb 21 1994 14:32 | 3 |
| It would make more sense for them to have a competent driver (like this
year's Gold winner) test out the sled. It's obvious our bobsledders
aren't quite there yet.
|
155.614 | | HANNAH::ASHE | We're through being cool | Mon Feb 21 1994 14:44 | 2 |
| they would have been 25th of 43 if they weren't disqualified...
|
155.615 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Mon Feb 21 1994 15:03 | 30 |
| > A leetle brouhouha is developing on the relative success, or lack of,
> of the American bobsled team and :"da Sled".. Mixed reviews on the
> Bodine product. Some complain that the US tried to make the Bodine
> project a two-year rush job instead of a four year cycle.. what the
> hail do these USOC apologists work for us?? Sheeeoot, the US
> underachieves and the product is immature. What about the bobsledders?
Shimer said the sleds were great, but he's been having an off-year.
The other driver said he didn't like the runners.
Shimer I think was just grousing about his brakeman, because they're
having an off-year and they weren't getting good starts.
As to it being a four year project vs two, I've heard Bodine and the
guy from Chassis Dynamics talk about that a couple of times. When Bodine
first approached whoever it was and got together with the chassis shop
in Oxford, they were not aware that they two-year interrim was going to
be put in place. They thought they had four years to do it.
I think the sleds are in good shape -- we could just use a few new
bobsledders 8^). Seriously, it was nice to see them run on the American
sleds. I think that there is a lot of potential there, and between now
and 1998 maybe we can find some good bobsledders....
'Saw
|
155.616 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Mon Feb 21 1994 15:12 | 4 |
| From what I read it sounds like something on the American sled is
broken. At first the driver thought it might have had something to do
with the brakeman, so he switched brakemen for a run. That didn't do
any good so they started to take a look at the sled.
|
155.617 | Supposed to be an example of ny humor | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Mon Feb 21 1994 17:18 | 6 |
| > with the brakeman, so he switched brakemen for a run
Tcm,
How does that NY line about the honest brakeman go?
He never stole a freight car...
|
155.618 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Mon Feb 21 1994 17:20 | 5 |
| hmm, I honestly don't know.
anyway sound like 1930's humor, before my time :-)
The Crazy Met
|
155.619 | not the challenger... | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Tue Feb 22 1994 01:04 | 3 |
| what!! Nassar screwed up again???
stig
|
155.620 | | MKFSA::LONG | and you know they got a helluva band! | Tue Feb 22 1994 08:24 | 17 |
| Okay, did anyone else happen to see the "crash and burn" the US
Ice Dance team took? I know, it was a weak moment and I happened
to look up from my book while the wife was engrosed in the 'pics.
Anyhow, it would seem that the guy's skate hit a screw which was
lodged in the ice. It happened during a lift move. The woman
was about 5 feet off the ice with her legs in a split. He lost his
balance and dumped her flat on her back with him faling on top of
her. It was not a pretty picture.
They did get up and continue the program, though. Immediatly
afterwards the guy skates over to where they fell and picks up this
screw and shows it to the judge. I figured surely they are going
to let them do their routine over, but no dice.
billl
|
155.621 | was Harding in on this one too??? | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Tue Feb 22 1994 09:20 | 3 |
| in other words they got screwed...
stig
|
155.623 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Tue Feb 22 1994 09:40 | 14 |
| They asked Jared Swallow later if he hit the screw. He said,
"No, it was over there and we were over here. I just caught
an edge."
It was pretty clear on replay there he did catch an edge. I
couldn't see anything on the ice near his feet.
Punsalan was on her feet mighty quickly for having landed on
her back like she did.
She's had a tought 3 weeks, what with her dad being murdered
(probably by her brother).
Scott
|
155.624 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've lost it. Help me find it! | Tue Feb 22 1994 09:55 | 2 |
| The screw is supposed to have come from the roof. The place is falling
apart I tell you....
|
155.625 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Tue Feb 22 1994 11:22 | 12 |
| >They asked Jared Swallow later if he hit the screw. He said,
>"No, it was over there and we were over here. I just caught
> an edge."
Actually, if you caught the entire interview...Jared was quite
sarcastic, saying that he talked to the judges who said he caught an
edge and then the above quote was stated.
However, I agree that he did not touch the screw.
Marc
|
155.626 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 11:28 | 12 |
| well one of the men figure skaters was allowed to redo his progrma when
he showed the judges that a screw on his skates was loose.
WEEI is running a contest on the Kerrigan-Harding matchup. Send in a card
with the places they will each come in. If you win, the prize is:
If Kerrigan beats Harding a free skating lesson
If Harding beats Kerrigan a free martial arts lesson.
talk about poor taste.
The Crazy Met
|
155.627 | Who need politics | STRATA::HUI | | Tue Feb 22 1994 11:50 | 25 |
|
I don't know what you all think, but did Torville and Dean got the shaft or
what? I did not see the silver medal performance but the couple who won the
gold did not do anything spectacular for me. Their moves were nothing compare
to the British couple.
I guest there are some restrictions for number of lifts and assisted lifts.
I guess the judges though the British couple may have broke the rules. But
the couple who won the gold medal did not performed perfectly either. Lets get
the instant reply going to see if they did break the rule first before you
hand out the medals.
It also seesm like there is not any movement in placing for this sport. No
manner how good you skate, you will not recieve the high marks unless you are
the top 3 couples. The US pair stayed in 14th until the fall. A few other
couples stayed in 10 and 4 place throughout the 3 phase of the competition.
I can not beleive they still call this a sport.
Let's get some timers and put up some fences. Then have them complete the
course in a certain amount of time. Maybe that will shake up the standings.
Get the politics out of the sport.
HUEY
|
155.628 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Feb 22 1994 11:54 | 31 |
| Only one more day to go before round one of the Kerrigan/Harding show down.
Reports on Harding's ankle are that it's better and she should be able to
skate.
My guess for the most likely order is as follows
Gold Oksana Baiul - Ukrainian
Silver Lu Chen - China
Bronze Nancy Kerrigan - U.S.A
4th Surya Bonaly France - France
5th Toyna Harding - U.S.A
Lu Chen is a bit of a dark horse but I'm guessing that her time has come.
These skaters are fairly evenly matched so the scores should be close. If
anyone wins both the long and short programs it would be a coincidence. Surya
Bonaly did beat Oksana Baiul in the European championships and Kerrigan skated
well against them in Japan but I believe those were upsets.
Any of these competitors could drop out of contention Wednesday night. They
say that you can't win the gold in a short program but you can lose it because
of the required elements that cost .5 out of 6 for each one missed. On average
with a field like the one above two random skaters would have a bad short
program and plunge down the list.
If Harding hits her triple axel and skates both programs clean, she'll move
up into medal contention. Without her triple axel, at least 2 of that group
would have to really mess up for her to have a shot at a medal. She hasn't
landed the triple axel in competition since the 1991 Nationals and usually
flubs it in practice.
George
|
155.629 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 11:59 | 5 |
| Harding was hitting the triple axels Sunday and Monday. Her only real chance
is to hit the triple axels, skate a clean program and have the others mess
up. If any of the others skates cleanly no way Harding gets the gold,IMNSHO.
The Crazy Met
|
155.630 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:00 | 3 |
| CBS radio will be carrying the skating competition live. WEEI in Boston.
The Crazy Met
|
155.631 | ????????????? | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Hall of Fame #75 | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:05 | 12 |
|
It said in the paper this morning the Us had 4 golds?
Moe 1
Jansen 1
Blair 1
?????????? Who's got the other one??
Chappy
|
155.632 | Other gold | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:09 | 1 |
| Other gold is in women's skiing.
|
155.633 | too many fixes | OUTSRC::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:38 | 2 |
155.634 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:39 | 17 |
| RE<<< Note 155.629 by METSNY::francus "/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan" >>>
>Harding was hitting the triple axels Sunday and Monday. Her only real chance
>is to hit the triple axels, skate a clean program and have the others mess
>up. If any of the others skates cleanly no way Harding gets the gold,IMNSHO.
If she does a triple axle, she'll only do one and it will be in the long
program. If she lands it and skates clean, she'll probably win. Since the
elimination of school figures after '89, no woman who's landed a triple axle in
competition has lost.
Surya Bonaly of France is the only other woman skater who can do a triple
axle, in fact she even has a quadruple toe loop but she lacks the artistic
element of the program. So if Harding lands her triple axle and skates clean
she should win (baring points lost to politics of course).
George
|
155.636 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:52 | 4 |
| George, try auto racing, horse racing, golf, track and field, and skeet
shooting for starters.
Mark.
|
155.637 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:54 | 2 |
| Speaking of ice dancing, when will ballroom dancing be included in the
Summer Games?
|
155.638 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:54 | 15 |
| > Surya Bonaly of France is the only other woman skater who can do a triple
> axle, in fact she even has a quadruple toe loop but she lacks the artistic
> element of the program. So if Harding lands her triple axle and skates clean
> she should win (baring points lost to politics of course).
Tonya also has the knock of being athletic, and yet artisticly impaired.
She will be fortunate to be in the top four after the short program. In that
position, she will have to rely on major mistakes from above as well as
skating clean and hitting the triple axle, in order to get more than a bronze.
If she fails to hit the triple axle in the long program, she has no hope for
a medal.
Surya Bonaly is much more athletic and slightly better on the performance
numbers. My guess: Gold Bonaly, Silver Bayul, Bronze ? [Kerrigan if her
knee holds up.]
|
155.639 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 12:58 | 17 |
| re: figure skating
I meant that the politics will come into play which lessens Harding's chances.
re: judgement
Come on George! Comparing judging in figure skating to an umpire or
referee making a call on a close play does not work. There are few such calls
in any given game and the players decide the game. In figure skating the
judges have soooo much leeway that the whole scoring is too subjective.
My brother was joking that the reason there is a score for artisitic impression
is that the judges can use that as a weapon against or for particular skaters.
Might not be that far off.
The Crazy Met
|
155.642 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 13:03 | 20 |
| re: .638
good point. after the short program the skaters who are 1,2,3 can win the
competition by winning the long program. All other skaters need some
help. That is what makes that placement so important. In 1992 the standings
after the short program was Yamaguchi, Kerrigan, Bonaly(?), Ito. Ito won
the long program, Yamaguchi was second and won the gold. Ito needed someone
else to beat TYamaguchi to get the gold.
In the short program there are 6 (?) jumps/moves they have to do. The artistic
part is much more important in the long program. Harding is very good
technically so she could do fairly well in the short program.
I am sure CBS is hoping for Kerrigan and Harding to both be in the top 3 after
the short program.
Harding skates 8th in the short program, Kerrigan 26th (second to last).
Kerrigan will be skating after all the other contenders which is supposed to
be an advantage. Order is determined by a random draw.
The Crazy Met
|
155.644 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 13:08 | 7 |
| > How about George Brett cranks one out, Billy Martin complains that the bat
> has too much pine tar, the umpire calls him out ...
you're talking about exceptions, not what usually happens. That should tell
you something.
The Crazy Met
|
155.646 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 22 1994 13:12 | 9 |
| George sounds like a candidate for one of Tommy's "you've got a little
too mucy free time on your hands" remarks.
There's a vast difference between a sport where the total scoring is
based on a judges judgement of performance and sports where rules are
occasionally based on a judgement call.
George, some of your examples are weak. Go back to Examples 101 and
come back when they measure up.....8^)
|
155.649 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 22 1994 13:21 | 8 |
| > but not everything. The original comment said that sports where the score
>is determined by a judge should be changed and I've listed sports where the
>score is determined by a judge. Even on an obvious home run, the umpire makes
>the call by waving his hand.
A mere formality.
|
155.650 | I like events with no subjectivity | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Feb 22 1994 13:29 | 13 |
| Reply to .641
There is no judge involved in speed skating, downhill, slalom,
bobsledding, cross country, luge, etc.
It is the fastest person wins...period. Its not based on looks,
or previous competition, or tradition, or anything else that is
real subjective. To me, while figure skating is entertaining and
athletic, and requires lots of training it just seems tainted that
a panel of judges determine who is the winner.
Frank Mendez
|
155.652 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 22 1994 13:50 | 30 |
| � So how about the Jamacan sled that came in 26th but was then dropped to last
�because their sled was over weight, or the speed skater that was disqualified
�because of the two false starts, that was a judgment call.
How were these judgement calls? Did a judge pick up the bobsled and
say "Hey, I think this is too heavy", or did it get put on a scale?
Did the skater cross the line before the start signal? He/she either
did or didn't, it's not a judgement call.
� In alpine and cross country there are judgment calls on going off the track
�or missing a gate.
Where is the judgement? You are either on the course or you aren't.
You either went through a gate or you didn't.
� Conversely, skating is not as objective as people imply, again look at the
�consistency between judges, the count of elements etc.
Kindly explain to us how "artistic impression" is objectively judged.
Yes, there are some objective criteria to the judging -- loosing �
point for falling in the short program for example -- but on the whole
the judging is subjective. It is scoring guidelines and the level of
competition which keeps the scoring tight, not the scoring system
itself.
�why would it be so popular if people didn't think it
�was a sport?
Rock music is immensely popular. Although it is discussed in here, it
isn't considered to be a sport.
|
155.654 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 22 1994 13:56 | 14 |
| > it's over the centerfield fence he isn't going to detract points
> because you didn't swing in a artful, graceful manner. And they
> don't give points for pirouetting around the basepaths.
Man, as great as he was, The Babe would've surely lost points for his
jog around the bases.......
Although Chuck "I was a Porno Star" Connors did a home-run one time where
he did diffeent things between bases.....cartwheels, and stuff.
I'll be he'd have scored high in the George System......
|
155.656 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 22 1994 14:29 | 13 |
| � Torvel and Dean lost because they did too many lifts, it was just as obvious
�to a trained judge as the extra pounds on the Jamacian bob sled.
Somehow I don't think a judge looked at the bobsled and said, "that's
too heavy". Not to mention that weight is not a sole function of
outward appearance.
�triple axle is a knockout punch in ladies singles, with it no one has lost
�since school figures were eliminated.
Well that's not saying much since both the triple axel and the
elimination of the compulsaries are relatively new events (within past
4 years).
|
155.657 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Tue Feb 22 1994 14:34 | 4 |
| Mr Ryan didn't say figure skating wasn't a sport.
He said it was a "bogus sport."
dr.a
|
155.659 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 14:48 | 3 |
| Very surprising that Torvill and Dean broke those rules.
The Crazy Met
|
155.662 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 22 1994 14:56 | 6 |
| And you know it was worse back in the days of the Iron Curtain.
The judges from behind the Iron Curtain always marked low for non-Communist
countries etc...
'Saw
|
155.665 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Feb 22 1994 15:09 | 8 |
| George seems to be claiming that Torvill an Dean's scores were
low because they violated an objective rule: too many lifts.
That was Tract Wilson's explanation last night because she couldn't
see any other reason why the technical scores were so low. However,
the chief of the judges has come out and said that they did NOT
find them to violate any objective criteria.
Rick Rollins
|
155.666 | back to the topic :-) | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 15:14 | 60 |
| Approved: [email protected]
Path: mets86.two.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!decwrl!wupost!looking!bass!bass!clarinews
Comment: Subject mapped from all upper case
From: [email protected] (Reuter/Martin Nesirky)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.olympic,clari.news.interest.animals,clari.news.trouble
Subject: Fifteen Elk Killed by Trains during Lillehammer Games
Keywords: urgent
Copyright: 1994 by Reuters, R
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 2:50:15 PST
Expires: Tue, 1 Mar 94 2:50:15 PST
ACategory: international
Slugword: OLYMPICS-ELK
Priority: regular
ANPA: Wc: 372/0; Id: a0286; Src: reut; Sel: reute; Adate: 02-22-N/A
Lines: 40
Xref: mets86.two.dec.com clari.sports.olympic:1184 clari.news.interest.animals:160
clari.news.trouble:1393
LILLEHAMMER, Norway (Reuter) - Fifteen elk have been hit and
killed by trains in the Olympic region since the Lillehammer
Games began despite elaborate measures to deter the huge animals
from wandering into danger.
Railroad workers even headed off into the snow-filled forest
along one line to frighten eight elk away on Monday after they
were spotted by helicopter getting too close to the track,
Norwegian State Railways (NSB) spokesman Stig Pettersen said
Tuesday.
``With all the snow this winter, the elk are seen near the
line almost every second day,'' he said. ``But this is the first
time I have heard of our people actually going out to them.''
The NSB and local authorities are using a cocktail of
measures -- including the deterrent smell of wolf urine and
enticing food parcels -- to keep the moose-like creatures off
the rails as dozens of trains transport up to 20,000 people to
and from the Games each day.
Pettersen said since the Olympics began on February 12, 15
elk had been struck and killed.
So far, none of the trains has been delayed. On Tuesday, NSB
laid on 16 extra trains to transport Norwegian fans to the men's
4x10km cross-country ski relay race and to the ski jumping, said
Dagfinn Berge, who is coordinating Olympic trains.
``Every train is on schedule,'' he said.
An average adult male elk weighs up to 660 pounds and
measures up to 6.5 feet high -- and that is just to the
shoulders. But it is still no match for an NSB locomotive
carrying hundreds of people through the Norwegian countryside.
Near-record snowfalls have forced elk out of the forests and
on to the tracks where it is easier to walk.
Thirteen elk were killed on the Olympic line in January
alone compared with six throughout 1993.
A helicopter chartered to monitor the elk spotted more than
60 near the tracks on Monday and alerted workers on the ground
to head off one group of eight.
In addition to the helicopter, which has an infra-red device
to ``see'' the animals at night, officials have been putting out
hay and pine needles at cleared areas in the forests and have
distributed artificial wolf urine near the rails to frighten the
elk back into the woods.
|
155.669 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 22 1994 15:27 | 5 |
| � Right away the report of what the judge said is suspect, how would any one
�judge know what all the others were thinking?
Maybe it wasn't what the judge said. Maybe it was what some reporter
said the judge said.
|
155.670 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Tue Feb 22 1994 15:30 | 3 |
155.671 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Feb 22 1994 15:35 | 6 |
| > So yes or no, did he or did he not lift her over his head to end the routine?
>
> George
He did. He's allowed to do that. He is allowed to do up to 5 lifts in one
routine.
|
155.674 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 22 1994 15:43 | 9 |
| � Figure skating does have a clear cut scoring system and there is a score
�board that everyone can see. That's what the skaters are looking up at after
�they skate.
Are you purposely being this dense? The scores aren't posted until
after the performance and they are the result of a bunch of different
factors. What Mike is suggesting is a system similar to that used for
baseball, basketball, football, etc. where points are posted as they
are earned.
|
155.676 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Feb 22 1994 15:55 | 12 |
| >> He did. He's allowed to do that. He is allowed to do up to 5 lifts in one
>> routine.
>
> But not over his head. That's only allowed in pairs.
>
> George
That's not my understanding, and no one mentioned it either last night,
or on the news wire reports. He can throw her over his head, but he
can lift her over his head. (Moreover, I suspect that Christopher Dean,
acknowledged as the world's best choreographer, would be aware of a move
that in and of itself would cause points to be deducted).
|
155.677 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Tue Feb 22 1994 15:59 | 15 |
| I can't believe we're discussing FIGURE Skating in here. Who ever gave
a rat's ass about such a BOGUS "Sport" (Ryan was right).
Too bad Bob Hunt isn't still around. He'd have set the record straight.
Figure skating is a "Cindy Sport". No doubt about it.
Who cares how many lifts or assisted jumps they did. Basically, no matter
how you cut it, or dice it, or more approriately, julienne it, it's still
a bunch of artistic expression judged by 8 judges.
It's like saying Salvatore Dali gets a 5.8 for artistic impression in
his "Persistence of Memory", but Picasso only gets a 5.4 for "Guernica".
Makes about that much sense.....
|
155.679 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:02 | 5 |
| 'Saw you might have something there when you rate those paintings. Maybe
one of the auction houses will pay you to do some research for this. Heck
if someone can give wines a rating on a 100 point scale, why not art.
The Crazy Met
|
155.680 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:15 | 4 |
| 'Saw, they aren't even talking about Figure Skating. They are talking
about Ice Dancing.
Will we seem ballroom dancing in Atlanta in '96?
|
155.683 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:21 | 7 |
| > a routine that they performed in Prague
Actually they changed 70-80% of the routine they
did in Prague because they realized that was not
the kind of stuff the judges were looking for.
The Crazy Met
|
155.684 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:22 | 15 |
|
re 155.660
>>You'd be hard pressed to name another "sport" where the athlete
>>is at the complete mercy of a group of judges who can simply dismiss
>>a particpant because they just weren't their cup of tea.
A rookie in the NBA that "never gets a call."
|
155.686 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:42 | 3 |
| If the Olympic coverage is getting you down, you can always watch
"Spunk", Comedy Central's version of the Tonya Harding story. I think
it's on Wednesday night.
|
155.687 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:45 | 3 |
| Comedy Central - time? channel?
The Crazy Met
|
155.689 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:46 | 5 |
| Channel -- Comedy Central
If you're in Worcester that's 32 on your cable box. I don't recall
what time it's on. Probably around 8 or 9 PM.
|
155.690 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:51 | 3 |
| don't get that channel in Cambridge.
The Crazy Met
|
155.691 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:53 | 1 |
155.692 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 16:54 | 5 |
| > So which is more the "Cindy sport": Soccer or Figure Skating?
no contest, figure skating by a landslide.
The Crazy Met
|
155.695 | leave my wife outta this(she reads at night 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Corporate Telecom Technology Solutions | Tue Feb 22 1994 17:01 | 1 |
|
|
155.696 | You had the "cool guy" part right, though... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Feb 22 1994 17:03 | 10 |
|
>> So which is more the "Cindy sport": Soccer or Figure Skating?
>
> Who's Cindy?
Bob Hunt's wife; you know, the guy who would never trash sports like
figure skating or gymnastics, but often did with exactly this term...
glenn
|
155.698 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 17:19 | 8 |
| > So a Cindy sport is a sport that Bob Hunt's wife likes?
in the narrowest sense yes. the term has come to mean more than that. you
nned to go through the archived notesfiles - Junk note is a good place
to start - and read about Cindy movies, etc. to really understand the
term.
The Crazy Met
|
155.699 | | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Feb 22 1994 17:20 | 15 |
| Figure Skating is not a "cindy" sport but Ice Dancing is.
And the judges are "cindy's" as well.
Did anybody catch the mens competition this weekend. I thought it was
quite interesting that Scott Hamilton pointed out before the skating
started that the judges were real traditional in their judging and that
Elvis and Phillipe would not fare well in the presentation scoring.
Guess what happens? Elvis and Phillipe skate a great techincal program
and then get bounced based on presentation. Those judges are a bunch
of "cindy's"
Frank Mendez
|
155.700 | | METSNY::francus | /er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan | Tue Feb 22 1994 17:21 | 4 |
| I thought Phillipe fell during his program??
The Crazy Met
|
155.701 | filberts | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Feb 22 1994 17:22 | 3 |
| He did but he was the only one with the "filberts " to attempt a triple
jump at the end of his program.
|
155.702 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Feb 22 1994 17:37 | 7 |
| Remember, all the U.S. and Canadian skaters are good friends of Scott
Hamilton. They are something of a tight community that hangs out together at
Ice shows. Also, CBS likes the announcers to get people excited about the U.S.
athletes.
Factor that in to what you hear from Scott Hamilton,
George
|
155.703 | | OUTSRC::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Tue Feb 22 1994 20:12 | 3 |
155.704 | | USCTR1::KING | Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones... | Wed Feb 23 1994 08:10 | 6 |
| I was watching the short track spedd skating relay lasted night I tell
ya.... I never laughed so hard in my life.... What a great sport to
watch... Demolition Derby on skates... Gotta love the "tag" between
the relay teams.....
REK
|
155.705 | | CTHQ::LEARY | HeyNancy! WannaGoOutForACouplaPitchers? | Wed Feb 23 1994 08:44 | 5 |
| Great minds think alike REK!!(hold on a sec, me and REK.. HELP!!)
8^)
MikeL
|
155.706 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Wed Feb 23 1994 08:45 | 13 |
| To add more fuel to the Ice Dancing fire...
CBS interviewed Torville and Dean last night. Tracy Wilson
also talked about Gritchuk and Platov, saying that you cannot
separate for more than 5 seconds at any one time.
First separation = 10 seconds (should be a deduction)
Second separation = 8 seconds (should be a deduction)
All I would ask is that the judges judge all couples fairly.
It appears they didn't.
Scott
|
155.708 | Just one time,one time | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Feb 23 1994 09:01 | 7 |
| Heard today on Imus that Vegas is taking bets on the figure skating
today. Can you imagine a line on something entirely decided by judges?
If this betting trend continues how does one get one of these judging
jobs?
billte
|
155.709 | HTH | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Hall of Fame #75 | Wed Feb 23 1994 09:03 | 6 |
|
Harding 15-1
Nancy 4-1
Chap
|
155.712 | ISFH | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Wed Feb 23 1994 09:51 | 13 |
| >> I'm really sad to see that you are twisting things around so much to try to
>>win your argument. .
>> Ok, no problem, now I know how you argue, more important to save
>>face than to get the facts straight. I'll remember that.
Congrats George, you have solved the riddle. Welcome to SPROTS
tradition... "BrydieSpeak"
My hearfelt kudos..
MikeL
|
155.713 | Chris and Jill, sittin' in a tree... | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Feb 23 1994 09:54 | 10 |
|
Speakin' a Christopher Dean, he's announced his engagement to Colorado
Spring's own Jill Trenerary (former World and Olympic champion in
women's singles). She even went to school where I got my
undergrad, the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs. Saw her
once in the CS airport, really nice (no, I didn't ask for her
autograph while talking to her), and not too bad looking either.
Kevin
|
155.714 | robbin' the cradle ole Chris is | GENRAL::WADE | My head's in Mississippi | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:20 | 4 |
|
Jill won an Olympic gold?
Claybone
|
155.715 | I thin so | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:24 | 15 |
| > <<< Note 155.714 by GENRAL::WADE "My head's in Mississippi" >>>
> -< robbin' the cradle ole Chris is >-
>
>
> Jill won an Olympic gold?
>
> Claybone
Thought so, that's what I remember from the article in the paper. Maybe
George, ::SPROTS esteemed skating analyst, can help us out. BTW, she's
25, he's 35. I'm 35 and he looks a heck of a lot older than I do,
maybe it's my genes!
Kevin
|
155.717 | | GENRAL::WADE | My head's in Mississippi | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:27 | 4 |
|
How soon we forget Kristi Yamaguchi!
Claybone
|
155.718 | Isn't Jill from Canada, and did win last 'pics? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:28 | 0 |
155.719 | Predictions | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:28 | 9 |
| Predictions FWIW
1)Oksana Baiul (Ukr)
2)Cheng Lu (Chi)
3)Nancy Kerrigan
4) Katarina Witt
5) French skater
6) Tonya Harding
|
155.720 | Medalists since 1976 | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:30 | 11 |
| I don't believe she won any medals. The last gold medalist before
Kristi Yamagucci(1992) was Dorothy Hamill(1976). I believe the top US
finishers since then are:
1980-Linda Fratianne (2)
1984-Rosalyn Sumners(2)
1988-Debbie thomas (3)
1992-Nancy Kerrigan (3)
Not positive,memory is starting to go.
|
155.721 | | CAMONE::WAY | Horseshoes and hand-grenades, man | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:31 | 9 |
| > I'm 35 and he looks a heck of a lot older than I do,
> maybe it's my genes!
Kevin,
35 is a very good age.
'Saw
|
155.722 | She is a dish... | KALI::MORGAN | | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:35 | 3 |
| I believe Trenery won the World Championships in '91.
Steve
|
155.723 | | MKFSA::LONG | and you know they got a helluva band! | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:37 | 16 |
| Now correct me if I'm wrong (like I gotta say that), but isn't this
the same ::SPROTS crowd who was totally flabergasted when Ice Skating
was determined to be the #1 'sport' watched on the tube? This
happened way before the 'Kerrigan clubbing'.
As I recall most in this file called it a tainted survey that didn't
represent the actual sports viewer's feeling.
Now we have the Winter Olympics going on and all you SPROTSfans
can find to talk about is ice skating, And the media darling hasn't
even drawn her first completly subjective score.
Guess that survey was right.
billl
|
155.724 | | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:38 | 7 |
| Bob,
Jill Trenery is originally from Minnetonka, MN and later moved to CO
for school and training.
Spud
|
155.725 | Canuck | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:40 | 5 |
| BTW, whatever happened to Elizabeth Manly from Canada? I didn't think
she was too bad. Not a bad skater, either.
Spud
|
155.726 | I still got a crush on Dorothy Hamill.. | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:42 | 1 |
|
|
155.727 | :*) | GENRAL::WADE | My head's in Mississippi | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:52 | 4 |
|
So what? You still got a crush on Lou Holtz!
Claybone
|
155.728 | | GENRAL::WADE | My head's in Mississippi | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:54 | 5 |
|
Hey Mr. Lazarus, not only is your memory starting to go, so are
your notes. What happened to .716?
Claybone
|
155.729 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Feb 23 1994 10:56 | 4 |
| Trenary was 4th in one of the Olympics - 1988(?). She won the worlds one
year - might have been 1991
The Crazy Met
|
155.730 | clang,clang,clang go CBS' cash registers | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:05 | 6 |
| CBS is predicting 100 million viewers for the Olympic coverage tonight.
Imagine what Friday will get if Harding-Kerrigan are in the top 3 after tonight.
Ratings in Boston are always very high when a local team is involved. Will
be fascinating to see how high the Boston ratings for tonight are.
The Crazy Met
|
155.731 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:17 | 26 |
| >When asked by Tracy Wilson what she'd heard from the judges, Torvell
>said that she heard a rumor that they detracted for Dean lifting her over
>his head.
Hmmm, does the word "rumor" mean anything to you. I heard a rumor that
MCI is going to buy us out, does that make it a fact? I watched that with
no sound (thus I can't say how they danced to the music or not, but I
can also say the announcers had no influence on me, I hate announcers)
and watched the event for what it was and not as a "can so and so win a
medal" In other words, I did not care who won, just wanted to see some
good skating.
T&D broke the rules, period. The Russian pair broke the rules, period.
One appears to have been penalized while the other was not. However,
all this aside, I really think that the couple that came in 4th (or maybe
it was 5th) was robbed of a medal. They were the best pair that did not
break the rules and got lower scores anyway.
Until the day comes where it can be judges objectively, it will always
be argued about whom was best. If you think about it, that is probably
the strongest selling point for skating. Each person has their own
point of reference. There is no definative scoring method which means
more of the "non-sports" people will watch them to determine for
themselves instead of just catching the highlights on the news.
Marc
|
155.732 | Why isn't TNT carrying it live? | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:18 | 14 |
| From what I've seen televised so far (which is very little) CBS does a
mostly gab and show a few highlights type of coverage. I get the idea
that they string out the viewer as long as possible (even though the
events have been over for about seven hours) and therefore have decided
not to sit through their back-patting and series of commercials. What
I'm asking is a guess - based on what's happened so far as to when
they'll show the skating highlights tonight? Will it be right away at
7pm or a few minutes here and we'll get back to you in an hour with the
next girl?
Thanks,
Spud
|
155.733 | Glad they showed as much as they did... | KALI::MORGAN | | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:23 | 6 |
| Actually, I was shocked last night at the amount of time devoted to the
Mens 4 x 25K X-country. Granted, it will go down in history as one of
the greatest Olympix events of all time, but to have CBS show that much
action (without any US involvement, no less) was certainly a change.
Steve
|
155.734 | Business not journalistic decision | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:24 | 14 |
| Well if CBS uses the pattern otheres have used they will drag out the figure
skating all the way through the night with the top skaters being shown
between 10 and 11. They'll probably show Blair's race between 9 and 10.
TNT: well CBS paid $295 million for the right to show the games. TNT has
secondary coverage. They can generally show only what CBS will not be
showing in prime time; hockey coverage is an exception - at least to some
degree; TNT can show games live until the medal round - thatis weekend so
CBS has that time anyway. CBS is doing what it can to maximize its ratings.
Ratings this year are up 35-40% from 1992 which was also a 6 hour time
difference from EST. Folks are watching even if they know the results. So
CBS keeps the best (or at least the most notorious/popular/etc.) for last.
The Crazy Met
|
155.735 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:32 | 11 |
| Marc Macgregor said what I was going to say. Torvill and Dean
made a mistake. Gritchuk and Platov made a mistake. One pair
was penalized, the other not. And, before the final skate, there
had hardly been any movement up or down in ranking. After the
final skate, T&D are moved to third (exceptionally good job
of skating) and G&P are moved to first (so so job of skating).
No wonder Gritchuk started crying. She knew they did a so so
job and she expected to get a Bronze at best.
Scott
|
155.736 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | BetterToDieOnYourFeetThanLiveOnYourKnees | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:40 | 11 |
| >Now correct me if I'm wrong (like I gotta say that), but isn't this
>the same ::SPROTS crowd who was totally flabergasted when Ice Skating
>was determined to be the #1 'sport' watched on the tube? This
>happened way before the 'Kerrigan clubbing'.
That survey was flawed Billl, the sampling was from the People's
Republic of Cambridge where figure skating, much like soccer is the
choice of the elite. Had the sampling been taken in Dorchester, ice
hokey, 'rasslin or drive-by-shootings would've ranked #1.
/Don
|
155.737 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:40 | 33 |
| Re Jill Trenary and some history leading up to the Nationals at Detroit.
Jill Trenary was a member of the national team in the late '80s. Her big move
was a triple flip (You need at least one difficult triple to be competitive at
the international level.). She was on the '88 Olympic team and finised out of
the medals (somewhere around 6th).
After just about everyone else went pro, she won the world championship. I
believe it was '89 or '90, then went pro herself.
In '91, Toyna Harding landed her triple axle and won the U.S. championship,
Kristi Yamaguchi came in 2nd and Kerrigan came in 3rd. That year at the world
championships, Harding flubed her triple axle and Yamaguchi beat her but
the 3 U.S. women came in 1, 2, 3 anyway.
In '92 they repeated going 1, 2, 3 in the Nationals and Yamaguchi won the
gold medal at the Olympics but this time Ito from Japan was back and won the
silver. Kerrigan beat Harding out for the bronze and Harding finished 4th
out of the medals. Yamaguchi repeated at the world championships a couple
months later.
Yamaguchi and Ito then both went pro and last year (1993) Kerrigan lead the
U.S. team to the world championships in the Czech republic. I don't think
Harding even made the team. Kerrigan botched her long program and finished 5th
out of the medals which is why the U.S only has 2 skaters at the Olympics this
year. Had she won a medal, we would have had 3.
This year Harding got back into shape and she and Kerrigan went to Detroit
to skate in the nationals to compete for the 2 slots on the U.S. team. Kerrigan
was attacked before the match and didn't skate, Harding won, the USFS named
Kerrigan and Harding to the team and the rest is pretty well known.
George
|
155.738 | | MKFSA::LONG | and you know they got a helluva band! | Wed Feb 23 1994 11:43 | 11 |
|
>> That survey was flawed Billl, the sampling was from the People's
>>Republic of Cambridge where figure skating, much like soccer is the
>>choice of the elite. Had the sampling been taken in Dorchester, ice
>>hokey, 'rasslin or drive-by-shootings would've ranked #1.
So, what are you telling me, /er, that all the SPROTSfans in here
are from Cambridge?
billl
|
155.743 | Barry Olympic Update | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 23 1994 13:31 | 77 |
| From: [email protected] (Dave Barry)
Subject:In Norway, spunky and clinically insane are synonymous
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:08 EST
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- We have had our first semi-tragedy
of the Winter Olympics. What happened was, a Norwegian ski jumper
named "Ole Gunnar Fidjestol" (or, as his friends call him, "Ole
Gunnar Fidjestol") was practicing for his part in the opening
ceremonies, wherein he was going to go off of a ski jump WHILE
HOLDING A FLAMING TORCH. Really. The idea was that he would land
safely and then light the Olympic flame, which serves as a
dramatic and inspirational reminder of what happens when oxygen
combines rapidly with torch fuel.
Unfortunately, during a practice a run, Ole -- perhaps you
have already heard about this -- was whacked in the knee by Tonya
Harding's bodyguard.
No, seriously, he crashed and hurt himself and had to go
to the hospital. Wouldn't you like to have been there when he
explained this accident to his insurance company? ("You did WHAT?
Carrying a WHAT??")
So anyway, Ole couldn't make the Flaming Torch Jump, and
the truly amazing thing is, THEY FOUND SOMEBODY ELSE WHO WAS
WILLING TO DO IT. That is the kind of spunky, by which I mean
clinically insane, people these Norwegians are.
No, really, the Norwegians are great. I do not wish to
generalize, but they are all ruddy-complexioned, helpful,
efficient and unfailingly polite. Also, they all appear to be 22
years old. I don't know what happens to old Norwegians. Perhaps
their reflexes slow down and they get trampled by moose.
There are a lot of moose here, even in the downtown
Lillehammer area. In fact, according to published reports that I
am not making up, the Norwegians spread wolf urine on the railroad
tracks to keep the moose away. This leads to the question: How do
you gather wolf urine? It would take an extremely spunky Norwegian
to do that. I bet that whenever flaming-torch-jumpers gather
together, they say, "Well, we may go off ski jumps holding
torches, but at least we don't collect urine from wolves. Those
guys are NUTS."
Here are some other Norway Facts:
FACT: The king of Norway is named "Harald."
FACT: The Norwegian unit of currency is the "krone"
(plural: "kroner") with one krone being equal to an amount of
money that no two Americans can agree on or figure out even with
the aid of calculators. On the 100-kroner note is a picture of a
woman; according to Sissel Karlsen, a 22-year-old Norwegian who
works in the press center, this woman was "the sister of a very
famous Norwegian writer.',
I asked Sissel how come the sister was on the currency, as
opposed to the famous writer.
"I don't know," she said.
Norway: Land Of Mystery.
FACT: There is a LOT of snow here. According to the
Olympic news agency, there is a record 132 centimeters on the
ground. (To get an idea how much snow this is, just remember this
simple formula: One centimeter equals 17 kroner.) There are large
snowbanks all over the place, especially in the Media Village,
where many members of the press are staying and attempting to walk
back to at night after drinking a local beverage called
"aquavit," which is made from alcohol, enriched uranium and wolf
urine. Nobody knows how many people have fallen into these
snowbanks, but my guess is that come August, when the snowbanks
finally melt, the landscape will be littered with frozen
journalists, who, upon exposure to the sun, will thaw out and
immediately file expense reports. That is the kind of
professionals we are.
In the other news: First lady Hillary Clinton is here to
meet the U.S. Olympic team and show off some lovely vacation homes
constructed by the Whitewater Development Corp. Also, do not quote
me on this, but I have been told by informed sources that the
actual Olympics per se have started. I will have more on this
important story if it involves Tonya Harding.
(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
155.744 | Bobsledding & Luge | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 23 1994 13:32 | 87 |
| From: [email protected] (Dave Barry)
Subject:Fear reigns on the bobsled and luge runs
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:17 EST
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
(EDITOR'S NOTE: Due to technical difficulties, the
following column fails to mention Tonya Harding. We are working on
this and will correct it as soon as possible.)
LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- I will admit that I was scared.
My body was crammed uncomfortably inside the unforgiving,
spartan, cold-metal fuselage of a two-man Olympic bobsled. My
hands were clutching at two handles attached to ropes that were
supposed to steer this fiendish machine, which can reach speeds of
up to 90 mph as it hurtles down the bobsled-and-luge track, a
huge, menacing, surreal, snakelike sculpture of ice and concrete.
"Scared" is not really the word for how I felt. I was
terrified. Only one thing kept me from losing control and
screaming hysterically and peeing in my thermal underwear, and
that was the knowledge that this particular bobsled was not,
technically, hurtling down the bobsled run. It was sitting
motionless on a level surface next to the bobsled-storage shed. So
I was unlikely to crash. But I still didn't like it.
"Hey!" I said. "I'm stuck in here!"
"It's not real comfortable," agreed Greg Sebald, helping
me climb out. Greg is the driver of this bobsled. He's a 30-year-
old patent attorney from Minneapolis, but he's representing Greece
in the Olympics. He can do this because (a) His mother is Greek,
so he has dual citizenship; and (b) "Minneapolis" is a Greek
name (it means, "City with a Greek name").
Greg has been a bobsled driver for only two years. One day
he just decided to do it, so -- I am not making this up -- he
enrolled in bobsled-driving school, where he got a bobsled
license.
(I don't know what happens if you go down the bobsled run
without a license. Perhaps you get pulled over by the Bobsled
Police.)
Then he contacted the Greek Olympic Committee and arranged
to represent Greece, which is not a major world bobsled power.
Greg is driving a rental bobsled.
"We had to give them a damage deposit," he told me.
I asked him if he gets scared, going down the track.
"I'm scared every time," he said. "I'm especially
worried that, one of these days, I'm going to open my eyes."
You have to admire this attitude. I think we should all
root for Greg, and, if we have invented anything, we should hire
him to obtain the patent for us, once the Olympics are over,
assuming he survives.
Actually, I'm sure he'll do fine. The people I worry about
are the ones who compete in the luge event, which consists of
hurtling down the track at 80 miles per hour while lying backwards
on a "sled" that is about the size of a cafeteria tray.
My guide to this event was Dmitry Feld, a stocky, bearded
man who is a coach and public-relations person for the U.S. luge
team. He started luging as a youth in the Soviet Union, coming to
the United States in 1978. He is an extremely outgoing person who
seems to be close personal friends with everybody in the world. It
takes him forever to walk anywhere because people are constantly
stopping him to shake his hand, hug him, etc. Reindeer come out of
the woods to lick him. If alien life forms ever land here, their
first words will be "Yo! Dmitry!"
So anyway, during luge practice one day, Dmitry and I
stood at the bottom of the Olympic run while he explained the
sport to me.
"You steer with leg and shoulder," he was saying. "You
try to be as aerodynamically as possible. Here he comes now.
Look."
I turned toward the track and WHOOOOOOOSH this
thing went past, faster than you could say
"WHOOOOOOOSH," faster than you could see; all that registered
was a blue blur traveling at -- I am good at judging these things
-- the speed of light.
"Lord," I said.
"Yes," agreed Dmitry.
I cannot adequately describe to you how scary the luge
event looks. Let me just say this: At the end of the run, there is
a long section that slants steeply uphill, so the sleds can slow
down. Try to imagine the fastest sled ride that you ever had. The
luge people go five times as fast as that UPHILL.
I suggested to Dmitry that anybody who would do this had
to be a few utensils shy of a place setting. He shook his head.
"We are not crazy people," he said. "We are just crazy
people who wants to win Olympic medal."
Fair enough.
(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
155.745 | And you thought sitting in Foxborough was bad | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 23 1994 13:32 | 77 |
| From: [email protected] (Dave Barry)
Subject:Norway's professional bench-icers did their job
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:24 EST
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- In a moment, I will get to the
various Winter Olympic sporting events and how we in the news
media are not allowing them to be overshadowed by Tonya Harding.
But first, I want to tell you about the official opening ceremony,
which was a spectacular and dramatic event that I will remember at
least until my butt thaws out, which won't happen for a long, long
time. Twenty years from now, when I go in for a physical
examination, the doctor will say, "Mr. Barry, you seem to be
perfectly normal, except for the fact that your butt is minus 12
degrees Fahrenheit at the core."
The problem was that the ceremony was held in a stadium
where the spectators sat for three hours on concrete benches
covered with a thick layer of ice. My guess is that the Norwegians
put the ice there on purpose. They probably had professional
bench-icers working all night, because these people LOVE the cold.
Even when it's really, REALLY cold, so cold that we visiting
journalists are afraid to blink for fear that our eyes will freeze
shut and we will be unable to fill out our expense reports, the
Norwegians are walking around outdoors practically naked, happy as
clams.
Maybe it's their diet. It consists almost entirely of cold
food, mainly salmon, which seems to show up at every meal in
virtually every form, including ice cream, coffee, cigarettes,
etc. You know how in some hotels, the chambermaids leave you a
piece of chocolate? Well, the other day, the maids in the media
village here left -- I am not making this up -- little packets of
SALMON JERKY. This was in case you woke up at 2 a.m. thinking, as
so many people do, "Whoa, I have not consumed any salmon for SIX
HOURS!"
So as you can imagine, after being here for a while, a
person can develop a fearsome case of salmon breath, which is
difficult to get rid of inasmuch as the Norwegians probably use
salmon-flavored toothpaste. Thus, no matter how cold it is,
everybody is happier outdoors.
Everybody was certainly very happy at the opening
ceremony. One highlight, of course, was the arrival, via ski-
jumper, of the Olympic torch, which had spent the past few months
traveling around visiting various historic sites, holding press
conferences, signing endorsement deals, appearing on Letterman,
etc. The torch was impressive, but -- as is so often the case when
you finally see a famous torch in person -- it was not as tall as
I expected. For me, the most dramatic moment in the ceremonies was
when a whole bunch of Norwegians came skiing like lunatics down a
steep hill and, in mid-slope, turned somersaults WHILE CARRYING
FIDDLES. It was amazing. I'd like to see Somersault Fiddle Skiing
become a regular Olympic event. In fact, I think an effort should
be made to involve other instruments; I would pay a lot of money
to see the Piano Ski Jump.
But moving on to the Olympic games themselves: We here in
the U.S. news media are all SICK AND TIRED of the whole Tonya
Harding thing, and we are doing our level best not to let it
overshadow the athletic events. Some of us have even taken the
extreme step of actually talking to athletes other than Nancy
Kerrigan (Yes! There are some!).
"So," we ask these athletes. "What do YOU think of this
Tonya Harding thing?"
Also there has been a major new development on the wolf-
urine front. You may recall that in an earlier column I stated
that, according to reports published in a publication that shall
remain nameless (Sports Illustrated), the Norwegians were putting
wolf urine on the railroad tracks here to repel moose. Well, I
have here a Dallas Morning News report stating that (1) They are
NOT moose, they are elk; and (2) The Norwegians are NOT using wolf
urine to repel them. They are using salmon urine.
No, seriously, they claim they are not using any kind of
urine at all. I will continue to monitor this story and provide
you with updates as warranted. I also plan to look into published
reports here that the cheese slicer was invented by a Norwegian.
Don't thank me: I'm just trying to avoid doing my job.
(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
155.746 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 23 1994 13:33 | 78 |
| From: [email protected] (Dave Barry)
Subject:Journalists wisely stay indoors to cover events at the winter olympics
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:33 EST
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- Picture this: Thousands of
Norwegians are gathered outdoors at the base of a mountain on a
bright but bitterly cold morning. They are waiting for the
downhill skiing event. Many of them are standing on little mats
set in the snow. They have been standing here for hours, in the
cold. Normal people would be dead by now, but these are
Norwegians. They have eaten a hearty breakfast of cold salmon
slices topped with slices of cold salmon, and now they are out in
the frigid air, and they could not be happier.
There is a powerful public-address system, which is
blasting, at high volume, the song "Achy Breaky Heart," by Billy
Ray Cyrus. The Norwegians love this. They are bouncing up and down
on their mats in time to the music.
"Don't break my heart," Billy Ray is singing, "my achy
breaky heart ..." And thousands of bodies bounce joyously up and
down, Norwegians getting down and funky.
Meanwhile, way way waaaaaaay up on the top of the
mountain, crazy people are waiting. They are called "downhill
skiers," although this is not an accurate term, because the
"hill" is not really a hill at all, but what a normal person
would call a "cliff." These people are basically falling from a
tremendous height with skis attached to their feet. In a few
years, this event probably will evolve to the point where the
competitors no longer even bother with skis; they'll just climb to
the top of a 2,000-foot tower, and, one by one, they'll jump off
and see who can form his body into the most aerodynamic shape and
splat into the ground the fastest. This would be an extremely
popular Nordic sport.
But even with skis, the downhill is one of the most
dramatic Winter Olympic events, and many of us journalists are on
hand for the purpose of not looking directly at it. We leave that
to the Norwegians. What we do is watch the event on TV inside the
press building, which, by the way, is heated. That's right: We
journalists ride in buses for an hour to get to this event, and
then we watch it on TV. The reason for this is that, if we go
outside, we can see only the very last part of the run, plus we
could freeze to death with the sounds of Billy Ray Cyrus echoing
in our brains. So we wisely remain inside and stare at the TV,
following the progress of the competitors as they fall down the
cliff. Every now and then, when a competitor gets near the bottom,
we glance out the window, and in the distance we can see the skier
in the form of a colorful little dot hurtling down the side of the
mountain, causing the Norwegians to cheer and jump up and down on
their mats.
Perhaps you are asking yourself why, if we journalists are
just going to watch the event on TV anyway, we bother going all
the way out to the downhill course. Why not just stay back in the
main press center and watch it on TV from there? Or, better yet,
why not just stay home and watch it from the security of the
United States, which is also equipped with television and, as a
bonus, does not have the same basic climate as a tank of liquid
nitrogen? In fact, why not go to a REALLY warm place, such as
Tahiti, and cover the Winter Olympics from there?
The answer is: If we did that, we would not be able to
give you all these insights into the Norwegian culture. Here's one
I had yesterday: They don't just eat salmon here. They also eat
reindeer. I had a sector of reindeer for dinner, and it wasn't
bad. I would say it tasted kind of like salmon.
WOLF-URINE UPDATE: This story just gets more and more
complicated. According to Hugin, the official newspaper of the
Olympic Games, the Norwegians ARE, in fact, using "chemically
produced wolf urine" to keep moose off the train tracks.
BONUS WOLF-URINE FACT: In the French version of the story,
"wolf urine" is translated -- I am not making this up -- as
"pipi de loup."
TONYA HARDING UPDATE: Under an agreement reached with the
U.S. Olympic Committee, Miss Harding will be allowed to compete in
the Men's Bobsled event.
(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
155.747 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Feb 23 1994 13:33 | 82 |
| From: [email protected] (Dave Barry)
Subject:Exposing Tonya, reporters' real interest
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:43 EST
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- In a moment I will be bringing you
an exclusive photograph of Tonya Harding naked with a reindeer,
but first we have this news bulletin concerning:
BOBSLEDDERS ON DOPE
According to the official Olympic news agency, the driver
of the Austrian two-man bobsled team was sent home because he
"tested positive in anti-doping control." This is extremely
alarming news, because it seems to suggest that there might be
bobsled competitors here who are NOT on dope. Let me just state
that I, personally, would not consider going down a bobsled run
unless huge quantities of narcotics were coursing through my
bloodstream. If I were on the bobsled team, I would carry a
syringe in my uniform so I could give myself additional dope
injections on the way down.
I want to stress, however, that I am not putting dangerous
substances of any kind into my body, other than mass quantities of
Norwegian beer, because I want to remain alert now that Tonya
Harding is finally here. We in the American news media are so
happy about this that we want to hurl our hats into the air, but
of course we don't, because our hair would freeze solid and break
off like No. 8 spaghetti.
We are crazy mad in love with this story. We were bored to
death with watching Olympic sporting events such as the Men's 10
Kilometer Alpine Uphill Snow Shoveling. We are not here to cover
winter sports: We are here for Human Interest, by which I mean,
dirt. We also like tragedy. If we had our way, the Olympic
athletes would be selected solely on the basis of having extremely
tragic and/or depraved lives, and they'd never actually engage in
athletic competition. They'd just stand around the media center
and let us do Human Interest stories on how they had managed to
become Olympic biathlon contenders despite being born with four
stomachs, or whatever.
That is why we love the Tonya Harding story so much, and
-- admit it -- so do you. And that is why, as I promised at the
beginning of the column, I am pleased to present the following
EXCLUSIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF TONYA HARDING NAKED WITH A REINDEER.
(Note to Editor: Please insert the exclusive photograph
here. For caption purposes, please note that Miss Harding is the
one on the right.)
I have not yet seen Tonya Harding in person, because for
security reasons she is surrounded at all times by a dense, 400-
foot thick protective layer of journalists. I did, however, see
Nancy Kerrigan. She was sitting with her agent in the audience of
the pairs figure-skating competition. (Yes! There are figure
skaters here besides Nancy and Tonya! I was shocked.) I did not
actually interview Miss Kerrigan, but I would say, just judging
from the back of her head, that she was relaxed but apprehensive,
as well as hopeful, yet striving to remain focused on the task
ahead. Or maybe that was the agent.
Pairs figure skating is a very dramatic event. It consists
of two people: a tiny, relentlessly perky woman wearing a cute
little costume with lots of beads and sequins; and a large, strong
man, who has to wear a costume that matches the woman's, so he
looks like a complete twink out there. You can tell he's really
ticked off about this, because every 30 seconds or so, when
they've built up a good head of steam on the ice, he hauls off and
throws the woman as far as she can, which is pretty darned far,
because most of these women are no heavier than a box of breakfast
cereal. Sometimes the woman falls down when this happens, but she
always jumps right back up and skates perkily back toward the man.
"DON'T DO IT!" you want to shout at her. "HE'S JUST
GOING TO THROW YOU AGAIN!"
And sure enough he does. Finally, he becomes exhausted and
stops; then the judges hold up numbers indicating how far they
estimate the woman traveled, in meters, on the best toss. The
Russians always win this event. There will come a time, within our
lifetimes, when a Russian male skater will throw a Russian female
skater completely out of the rink. This is the four-minute mile of
the sport.
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: We regret that due to the Tonya
Harding situation, there will be no update today on the wolf-urine
story.
(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
155.748 | I'm slipping | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Wed Feb 23 1994 13:53 | 15 |
| >> Mike, we're trying to hold an intelligent conversation about
>> that greatest of all sports, Ice Dancing. There's no reason to
>> be bashing me just because I tend to get rather passionate
>> when discussing the intricasies of La Belle Danse Sur Glace.
>>
I think youowe me an apology.
I apologize because there's no reason to bash you just because you
tend to get rather passionate when discussing the intracacies of
La Belle Danse Sur Glace (Cada Mia Tish.. that's French!) and this is
a very weak example of BrydieSpeak and I will leave you alone until
I see vintage.
MikeL
|
155.750 | See redsox note for plenty of it | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Feb 23 1994 14:48 | 7 |
| >having some guy insist "yeh, they didn't get runs but they should of
>won anyway, heck they had more baserunners." How do you argue with
>something like that
%
This is called redsox talk - we've been doing this for the entire lou
gorman reign, in fact for my entire life which tcm will tell you is a
long time.
|
155.751 | | STRATA::HUI | | Wed Feb 23 1994 15:43 | 22 |
|
Yeah!, How about the Canadian who would have gotten the Bronze in the 1000
meter because they disqualified the British racer for interference but
since he did not finish the race because he fell. They gave it to another
canadian who won the "B" divison race.
Tell me he is not hitting himself in the head.
I think the shorter guy has the advantage in the short track even.
As for the Ice Dancing, I notice Tracy Wilson also shown the gold medal pairs
doing some illegal moves (Separation for more then 5 seconds twice and
supporting the weight of the female skater when she had his knees in his
chest). The rule written in black ane white and the judges are suppose to
deduct .3 for each violation. I did see any 5.1, 5.3, or 5.7 in their
technical scoring.
HUEY
|
155.752 | Go Team Canada | JUNCO::BOLDEN | | Thu Feb 24 1994 06:19 | 19 |
|
I am not surpised the USA hockey team got crushed by the Finns.
The USA has the speed but the forwards and defensemen seemed awfully
small compared to the Finns. They never control the neutral ice
area at all from what I saw. I believe their youth and inexperience
got the best of them. Anyway the Finns looked pretty good themselves.
Oh, I have not watched CBS at all. I will not give them the pleasure
of watching their commercials, fluff pieces, tabloid TV,
sensationalism, picknannie journalism, whatever other s*** and their
5 minutes of sport actions! Not for me, man. And I thank you.
Craig
|
155.753 | Poor, poor job as usual CBS | ANGLIN::WIERSBECK | Golden Gopher hoops! | Thu Feb 24 1994 09:08 | 10 |
| Yeah, just think, it only took CBS over 2 1/2 hours to get to
Kerrigan's routine. I caught the skaters and Bonnie Blair, otherwise I
was catching the Bulls or watching a tape of a '78 World Series game.
Blah, blah, blah, commercial X infinite, blah, blah, blah, highlight
(oops, how'd that get in there?) blah, commercial x infinite...
How they keep viewers, I don't know.
Spud
|
155.754 | CBC feed live | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Feb 24 1994 09:47 | 4 |
| A lot of sports bars with satellite dishes got the CBC feed and
broadcasted the skating live. Mike and the Mad Dog had the same feed
and commented how great it was to just watch
sport,nocommercials,no fluff.
|
155.755 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 24 1994 09:48 | 4 |
| � -< CBC feed live >-
Coming in to work this morning I was thinking that if JD were here, all
we'd be hearing about is the CBC.
|
155.756 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Thu Feb 24 1994 09:49 | 11 |
|
Heard this morning, third-hand,
that 2 skaters (2nd place Baiul and 5th place
Szewczenko) collided in practice this a.m.
Both were skating backwards full tilt.
Baiul cut her leg, Szewczenko had to be carried
off. I was waiting for the Tonya punchline that
never came.
Anybody else hear this?
dr.a
|
155.757 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Feb 24 1994 10:20 | 6 |
| Szewczenko came back on the ice for a very short time.
Baiul needed 5 stitches.
No word on whether they will be able to skate tomorrow night.
The Crazy Met
|
155.758 | Cross Country Skiing | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 24 1994 10:34 | 79 |
| From: [email protected] (Dave Barry)
Subject:Norwegian Super Bowl
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 94 13:15:12 EST
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- I went to see cross country skiing,
an Olympic event that -- talk about your poor planning -- was held
OUTDOORS. This was very unfortunate, because the weather, in
defiance of the known laws of physics, has gotten even colder. You
have to walk very carefully for fear of tripping over body parts
that have fallen off of visiting journalists without their
noticing it. It is so cold that the Norwegians won't tell us the
real temperature; they are using a secret temperature code, called
"centigrade."
It was approximately 740 kilometers below zero when I
arrived at the cross country ski stadium, which was, needless to
say, jammed with thousands of happy Norwegians, bouncing up and
down, ringing cowbells, blowing horns and emitting cheerful puffs
of salmon breath into the frigid air. Some of them had been there
all night. They LOVE cross country skiing. This is a huge event
for them, very much like our Super Bowl, except that at the Super
Bowl, you can actually see the game.
This is not the case with cross country skiing. You do
catch a brief glimpse of the skiers at the start; they take off
one at a time, 30 seconds apart, wearing their aerodynamic Spider
Man outfits, while the crowd roars insanely. But the skiers
immediately ski OUT OF THE STADIUM. Just like that, they're GONE,
possibly to Sweden, and sometimes they don't come back for hours.
It's as if you were at a football game, and on the opening
kickoff, the player who caught the ball sprinted out the stadium
exit, with all the other players running right behind him, and you
spent the rest of the game ringing a cowbell and waiting for them
to come back.
Speaking of freezing to death: I have formulated an
alarming new theory as to why the Norwegians do not seem to notice
the cold: they are eating radioactive reindeer. Really. According
to the Norway Tribune, an English-language newspaper here, there
is still a lot of radioactive material that drifted over after the
Chernobyl nuclear accident, and it is showing up in the reindeer
meat, thus giving a whole new meaning to the famous song lyrics:
"And if you ever saw it,
"You would even say it glows."
And speaking of scary animals, there has been a:
MAJOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE WOLF-URINE STORY
I have now been in contact with TWO high-level Norwegian
State Railways officials in regards to this fast-breaking story,
which is threatening to overshadow even -- Dare I say it? -- Tonya
Harding. According to a maintenance official named Knut Langballe,
the Norwegians are NOT, contrary to published reports, merely
using synthetic wolf urine to repel moose from their railroad
tracks; they are using a synthetic MIXTURE, which simulates wolf
urine, lynx urine and -- get ready -- WOLVERINE urine. I swear I
am not making this up. These people are truly on the cutting edge
of moose-repellent science.
Langballe did not reveal the exact chemical formula, which
is probably a Norwegian state secret. But he did state, for the
record, that "it smells really bad."
I can vouch for this. After I spoke with Langballe, a
photographer and I met in downtown Lillehammer with Arild Vollan,
information director for the state railways, who brought a small
plastic tube of moose repellent with him and let us actually sniff
it. All I can say is this: If we had dropped this stuff on
Baghdad, Saddam Hussein would be a distant memory today.
In addition to the moose repellent, Norwegian State
Railways tracks moose by helicopter and radios their locations to
Moose Command Central. Despite these efforts, more than 300 moose
have been hit by trains so far this winter, often causing
considerable damage to the locomotives.
"Also," stated Langballe, "the moose gets minced."
I don't wish to be an alarmist, but it seems to me that,
sooner or later, one of these locomotives is bound to ram at full
speed into one of these atomic reindeer, and the entire Nordic
region is going to be engulfed in a giant fireball. That's the bad
news. The good news is, we would be warmer.
(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
155.760 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 24 1994 11:15 | 45 |
| With Baiul's health now in question, Kerrigan's chances of winning have
improved dramatically. When Baiul skates her best performance no one can beat
her long program without something like a triple axle but if she's injured that
opens the door to the rest of the field.
The way the scoring works in Figures, if any of Kerrigan, Oksana Baiul, or
Surya Bonaly win the long program, they should the gold medal. Kerrigan or
Baiul would win it outright and Bonaly would win outright if she won and
Kerrigan finished lower than 2nd. If Bonaly and Kerrigan came in 1, 2 then they
would be tied and I believe that the long program is the tie breaker so Bonaly
would win.
Kerrigan is normally strong in the short program and weak in the long. At
last years World Championship she appeared headed for a gold metal after the
short program then fell apart during the long program ending up 5th, but
lately she has been skating the long program better than she's ever skated it
before.
Suray Bonaly is also in great shape right about now and if she lands her quad
and skates clean that might be enough. Without it, her artistic score even
though much improved could still keep her off the top of the podium.
Chen Lu (or Lu Chen, depending on who's doing the reporting) is also in good
shape in 4th place. If she wins the long program she'll only have 3.0 points
which would beat anyone straight out except for Kerrigan or Baiul in 2nd place.
Kerrigan could beat Chen Lu or anyone lower from 2nd, Baiul would lose to Chen
Lu from 2nd in a tie breaker.
The chances of Toyna Harding winning the gold metal are extremely remote.
With 5.0 points, even if she wins the long program everyone else would have to
have 6.0 or more points for Harding to win. That means that Kerrigan would have
to be no better than 6th, Baiul and Bonaly no better than 5th, Chen Lu no
better than 4th, and so on. The chances of all that happening are pretty
remote.
Another major factor is that in the long program there are no mandatory
deductions for missing elements. If a skater misses a jump the only penalties
are that it takes a little off artistic impression and they don't get the
points it would have given them. They can often make those points up with other
jumps.
Unless Baiul makes a dramatic recovery, things look pretty good for a win by
Nancy, but I'll stick with my dark horse prediction of Chen Lu.
George
|
155.762 | Tonya was robbed, Nancy was almost boring | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Thu Feb 24 1994 11:32 | 24 |
| The Ukranian received 3 stitches according to ESPN.
If you are to be fair and impartial, you have to admit that Tonya was
robbed. There's no way her technical program scores deserved to be
that much lower than her artistic program. Her technical program had
some 4.8's and 5.0's in it, while the artistic was dominated by 5.2's
and 5.3's. She should be around 6th or 7th instead of 10th.
Unfortunately, the sympathy votes Kerrigan received were deducted from
Tonya. This points out another serious problem with opinionated
scoring.
Nancy was flawless and seem to play it safe, almost to the point of
being boring. She didn't push it or attempt any unusually challenging
moves to this casual observer.
My favorite of the night was Bonaly of France (currently 3rd). She was
very athletic, energetic, flawless, and pulled off some real tough moves.
Going into the splits on the run like she did at the end of her
performance was incredible. After Elvis (only error-free men's
performer) was robbed in the men's competition for not being
conservative in the judges' eyes, you have to wonder if they're racists
too.
Mike
|
155.765 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Feb 24 1994 11:38 | 19 |
| George, Bonaly can also win it outright no matter what Kerrigan does
Kerrigan .5
Baiul 1.0
Bonalu 1.5
after the short program.
Assume Bonaly wins the long and Kerrigan is second
Bonaly 1.5 + 1 = 2.5
Kerrigan .5 + 2.0 = 2.5
Tie breaker is the long program so Bonaly gets the gold. that is
why being 1,2, or 3 is so critical - those skaters can win the gold by
winning the long program. All other skaters need help.
The Crazy Met
|
155.766 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Thu Feb 24 1994 11:39 | 4 |
| But Harding seemed to get .5-.6 deductions.
The Crazy Met
|
155.767 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Thu Feb 24 1994 11:43 | 4 |
| Re: George & TCM
Exactly! 6 - .6 = 5.4, not the 4.8 or 5.0 which she had at least 2 of
each.
|
155.768 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Thu Feb 24 1994 12:00 | 20 |
| Maybe it's me, but Harding looked anything but smooth out there.
She didn't really hit anything of note. I too thought her marks were
a tad low, but only .2.. A 5.1 or 5.2 woulda been right.
Kerigan looked flawless. I saw nothing "easy" about her program.
Paul Wylie said that Kerrigan's short program had difficuly
step manuevers (whatever that means) and was not easy at all.
Some other skater (Hamilton) mentioned that a lot of jumps
(Bonaly maybe) look much more difficult than they really are.
And both Wylie and Hamilton wondered why the UK judge gave
Kerrigan two 5.6's and gave a 5.9 to the Ukrainian when
she clearly botched a landing..
Ah judging, who knows what lurks in the minds...
MikeL, another who doesn't really understand the scoring system
(only high school scoring).
|
155.769 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 24 1994 12:01 | 19 |
| � I have a new theory. I believe that well over 90% of the people who think
�skating is not a sport don't understand the 1st thing about the sport.
I believe that the "sport" in question was ice dancing, not skating.
Tell me George, is ballroom dancing a sport?
�or explain the scoring
�system.
As evidenced by the discussions in here, I doubt even a qualified judge
could do that.
� This would be the equivalent of someone saying that baseball was not a sport
�then not being able to describe a ground ball, double play, base hit in the
�gap, or how ties are resolved in extra innings.
Have you ever heard anyone call baseball a non-sport? I know of
several who call it boring or confusing (for some of the reasons you
mentioned above), but I can't recall anyone claiming it wasn't a sport.
|
155.771 | btw - good luck nancy and team canada | AKOCOA::BREEN | PC comes to UK,Travis Ford the victim | Thu Feb 24 1994 12:18 | 13 |
| I remarked that las vegas had a line on figure skating - a sprot
entirely decided by judgine and got an answer "So's boxing".
With Whitaker-Chavez still fresh I tried to explain "at least a
knockout can occur".
But ballroom dancing - much more of a "sport" than figure skating and
better athletes.
I had a chart on all this from last spring.
I was going to watch this last night and even saw tonya but with the
long drawn out program I was long gone before nk.
|
155.772 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Feb 24 1994 12:35 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 155.767 by FRETZ::HEISER "shut up 'n' jam!" >>>
> Re: George & TCM
>
> Exactly! 6 - .6 = 5.4, not the 4.8 or 5.0 which she had at least 2 of
> each.
But they weren't starting from 6.0 when they made the mandatory deductions.
She had already lost some points for skating as if she had led weights in her
feet.
If you check her presentation scores which were in the mid 5's, subtract .4
for the two mandatory deductions you end up around 5.0, 5.1 which is about what
she got for her technical scores.
George
|
155.774 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 24 1994 12:40 | 4 |
| �She had already lost some points for skating as if she had led weights in her
�feet.
Why, did those LED's flash out "Gilooly Did It" or something?
|
155.775 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Feb 24 1994 12:46 | 2 |
| If an Olympic event prepares you for a career in Disney on Ice, does it
qualify as a sport?
|
155.776 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Thu Feb 24 1994 15:34 | 7 |
| Actually, I got dragged to Disney's Alladin on Ice
last weekend. They had these Russians launching each other off
springboards, doing flips, and landing in chairs atop poles.
Kinda cool. And, George, I think you're getting your
chain yanked again.
dr.a
|
155.778 | | MKFSA::LONG | and you know they got a helluva band! | Fri Feb 25 1994 13:06 | 8 |
| Ok, George, if it will make you feel beter, I know absolutly
nothing about figure skating. (Feel better, now?)
What is a "double flip"? It apparently is not the same as a
double flip in gymnastics floor exercise.
billl
|
155.779 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Fri Feb 25 1994 13:07 | 19 |
|
George,
>If you check her presentation scores which were in the mid 5's,
>subtract .4 for the two mandatory deductions you end up around 5.0,
>5.1 which is about what she got for her technical scores.
I'm really surprised. For someone who is so knowledgable in this
arena, how could you make a fundamental mistake like this one? There
is no direct correlation between the technical score and the
presentation score, NONE. Either score can be higher and there are
thousands of examples in history to demonstrate this observation. The
formula for Techinal score is NOT Presentation - Mandatory Deductions.
You had me convinced that you knew what you were talking about, but now
you are losing credibility. Care to try that one again?
Marc
|
155.780 | And now for a double toe loop! | AIMHI::KERR | Curse Of The Box People | Fri Feb 25 1994 13:16 | 8 |
| Re: .778
"Double Flip" = Presenting two "strategic" fingers to other drivers on
Rt. 128
:-)
|
155.782 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 25 1994 14:19 | 1 |
| Yah, right George. It's hard to fight logic like that.
|
155.784 | I think Tonya's practicing voodoo | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Fri Feb 25 1994 14:33 | 5 |
| So is the Ukranian Flapper, Osaka Baio, going to skate or is
her wrenched back gonna scratch her?
MikeL
|
155.786 | jump summary | PACKED::COLLIS::JACKSON | DCU fees? NO!!! | Fri Feb 25 1994 14:35 | 57 |
| Impress your friends (and yourself)! Recognize all 6 different
jumps skaters do (not including back flips which are illegal in
competition [and not all that hard to do anyway]):
There are 6 jumps in skating:
loop (left leg free, does not touch ice)
toe loop (left leg used to jump off of)
salchow (right leg used to jump off of, outside edge)
flip (right leg used to jump off of, inside edge)
axle (skater going forward into jump)
lutz (right leg free, does not touch ice)
Explanations assume counter-clockwise spins.
All jumps land on right foot outside edge going backwards.
axle - only jump you start go forward, hence takes an
extra half spin to complete (therefore considered
the most difficult jump) Start on left outer edge.
loop - start on right outer edge going backwards; left leg
swung around to start jump
toe loop - same as loop except left foot planted on ice for
to jump off of. Easiest jump to complete.
flip/salchow - almost the same jump. Skating backwards on
left leg, the right skate is planted to jump off
of. The only difference is the edge of the left
skate before the plant - if it was an inner edge
(skater leaning on the inside of the left skate),
it's a flip; an outer edge and it's a salchow
Flip is considered easier since you are leaning
the same way as the jump will take you.
lutz - start on left outer edge going backwards, right leg
swung around to start jump. Same as loop except uses
opposite legs. This is the second most difficult jump.
In summary:
skating going forward? AXLE
Second jump of a combination? TOE LOOP
Left skate planted for jump? TOE LOOP
Right skate planted for jump? Probably a FLIP, possibly SALCHOW (both
syllables are OU as in OUCH)
Skater jumps without planting a foot? Probably a LOOP (skating on right
foot), possibly a LUTZ (skating on
left foot)
Skater does a triple axle? Must be watching men's competition (or Tonya
of a good day). :-)
|
155.787 | tuff neighborhood | GENRAL::WADE | My head's in Mississippi | Fri Feb 25 1994 14:38 | 6 |
|
Rat on Tommy. Where I went to school, pickup boxing matches
were everywhere. :*)
Claybone
|
155.790 | Hey, maybe in Finlandia, or Sveden... | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Feb 25 1994 14:46 | 52 |
|
>>I've always thought it was a good rule of thumb that if in doubt about
>>whether it's sport or not, ask yourself if kids play it as a pickup game.
In my best 8 yr. old scratch voice:
kid1: Hi guys, what's up?
kid2: ahh, nuthin, just wunderin what to do today..
kid3: yeah, wanna play somethin?
kid1: I know!! Let's do a 30k biathlon relay, that oughtta be fun!!
kid3: Yeah!! I'll go tell my mom!!
kid2: ok, me too. see ya in 5 minutes...
......
Anyway, it might be an old commercial for pizza hut or somethin,
but it starts out with various shots of a basketball court,
close ups of mean faces, then a voice saying:
"Ya gotta have heart" (somebody sweatin)
"Ya gotta have desire" (another guy doin pullups on a
backboard support)
Then it goes on with other shots of the faces, some closeups of
some biceps, then the voice.
"ya gotta have the ball"
the camera pans 6 or 7 guys, saying:
you got the ball?
no, you got the ball?
where's the ball??
etc. etc. etc.
pretty funny..
|
155.793 | never thought I'd stoop this low | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:05 | 2 |
| I can't believe I'm listening to Tonya skating on the radio. Some
interesting drama is going on though.
|
155.794 | ? | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:06 | 7 |
| Well spill this interesting drama..!! We needs a play by play main(in da
form feed note)..
MikeL
|
155.796 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:38 | 5 |
|
I heard Jake tried to do a Bolero but he choked on it.
|
155.797 | -1, Priceless!! I'm choking!! (er careful) | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:42 | 1 |
|
|
155.798 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | DieOnYourFeet>LiveOnYourKnees | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:44 | 11 |
| I'm proud to say I haven't watched one minute of any figure skating
sport the last couple of weeks. I didn't care about skating a few months
ago and I refused to let CNN/CBS and the MilitaryIndustrialComplex
determine what is or isn't "in". Tonight at 8 P.M. I want you to get out
of your living room chairs, I want you to go over to your window, I want
you to open the window, stick your head out and scream "I'm mad as hell,
and I'm not going to take it anymore!". Refuse to watch these pristine
primadonnas smugly glide along the ice. Strike a blow for individualism and
liberty!
/Don
|
155.799 | Very few have sat out CBS | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:49 | 3 |
| I agree with you . I've hardly watched any of the manipu;ation,but
we're in the deep minority.
|
155.800 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:50 | 2 |
| I'm with Slasher. I'm sending the wife upstairs to watch TV while I
watch Brisco County Jr.
|
155.801 | 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:51 | 5 |
| -1,
Now there's a life full of richness...
MikeL
|
155.802 | Thank goodness no more figureskating for foiur years | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bruno Kirby: Cop on the Edge | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:54 | 10 |
| Bad news - Brisco County Jr. is pre-empted tonight!!!!!! :-(
I was planning on watching Brisco myself!!!
Guess I'll have to pop in the tape of the UMass-Temple game from lasted
night and relive the glory all over again!!! I also have the Cal-UCLA
game, which is worth watching for the incredible show by the great
Jason Kidd and the comeback by UCLA.
NAZZ
|
155.803 | Take these skaters and shove it... | MKFSA::LONG | and you know they got a helluva band! | Fri Feb 25 1994 15:56 | 9 |
| I got an even better idear, /er. By 8:00 I'll be at the Legion
chasing away that wintery cottonmouth. Before I go in I'm going
to disconnect the cable so's nobody will be tempted to watch any
of that rubbish. I'll put some good ol' Johnny Paycheck on the
jukebox, and care less which one of them "pristine primadonnas"
whacks/falls/collides!
billl
|
155.805 | 8^) | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:03 | 7 |
| OH OH,
Eveeryone stay clear of the legion tonight,. Serious sport, darting,
is on the agenda.. Keep yer wimmen and children locked up..
MikeL
|
155.807 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I lift, you grab. ... | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:07 | 23 |
|
>> I'll put some good ol' Johnny Paycheck on the
>> jukebox, and care less which one of them "pristine primadonnas"
>> whacks/falls/collides!
Hey billlllllllll,
How many Country Western peoples does it take to change a light bulb???
5...
1 to change the bulb
And 4 to sing about the old one.
Schnortttt Schitttt Schlepppps
JaKe
|
155.808 | One can only hope | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bruno Kirby: Cop on the Edge | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:08 | 7 |
| AAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Say it ain't so!!! Perhaps Harding will be on trial by then, and the
judge won't let her leave the county to skate! And maybe Nancy will go
pro and pass up the worlds.
Nazz
|
155.809 | tick tock tick tock | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:10 | 8 |
| That's OK, NAZZ, patience me main..
Pretty soon it'll be GGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLL time,
and the soccer-ignorant will be saying
AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHH!!
MikeL
|
155.810 | I'll be at Foxboro for Bolivia/South Korea | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | Bruno Kirby: Cop on the Edge | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:13 | 15 |
| No Mike - go got it wrong. Hundreds of millions of soccer fans around
the world will scream in one voice:
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ah cain't wait!
NAZZ
|
155.811 | | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:15 | 7 |
| So sorry NAZZ,
Can I do it over? See I just got this Tonya-like asthma attack and
got cut short.....
MikeL
|
155.812 | Cain't wait for lots of good soccer talk in here! | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | GOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!! | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:21 | 3 |
| That's OK Mike. You still have more than three months to practice!
NAZZ
|
155.814 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:24 | 1 |
| Yeah, soccer players have no sticks.
|
155.815 | Continuing to enlighten soccer illiterates | TNPUBS::NAZZARO | GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!! | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:26 | 3 |
| But almost every soccer player still has all his teeth.
NAZZ
|
155.816 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:27 | 1 |
| you don't need a cup either if you don't have a stick.
|
155.817 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 25 1994 16:31 | 9 |
| � I hate to be the one to break this to you, it really tears me up inside, but
�the various national teams competing in Olympics figure skating this week will
�do the same drill in the World Championship along about mid March.
I can't recall this ever being carried on weeknight primetime before.
And despite all the Kerrigan/Harding hype, I imagine it will still be
relegated to ABC wide world of sports or some other Saturday or Sunday
afternoon broadcast as long as it doesn't interfere with NCAA or NBA
basketball.
|
155.819 | WTF is a Brisco County Jr.? | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Fri Feb 25 1994 17:00 | 0 |
155.821 | | 38346::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Fri Feb 25 1994 17:07 | 2 |
| Hey Tommy, sounds like either You & I or George will be making a trip
to the Crow Cafe in March. Frankly, I like our chances.
|
155.822 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Feb 25 1994 17:20 | 12 |
| Not a chance, the way I look at it
Figure Skating Spoiler
I was close enough with my call for the final standings that and won't be
eating crow for quite a while.
I believe I picked all 3 people on the podium, I just had Chen Lu at the
wrong end.
George
|
155.823 | My view of the elephant. | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Feb 25 1994 17:28 | 12 |
|
Ordinalarily� (this is about figure skating after all) I would
not get involved, but I suspect, as in a Miller commercial,
we'll do both.
I suspect the World Championships will be on Prime Time
during the week, probably on a Thursday.
|
155.824 | Last night's short track speed skating | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Fri Feb 25 1994 17:43 | 26 |
| What do fellow noters think of Kathy Turner's performance in the
short track speed skating? She was
1) accused by the Canadian skater, who was disqualified, for
interfering with her in the semi-finals. This was when
the Canadian skater tried to pass on the inside and resulted
in 3 skaters hitting the ice. The Canadian was DQ'ed and
the race was re-skated.
2) accused of interference by the Chinese skater in the final. This
was when she passed the Chinese skater on the outside. As
she was doing this, she did touch the Chinese skater with
her arm. The Chinese skater claims that she grabbed her
and interfered with her, and was very ungracious in defeat.
Over in Soapbox (yeah, I know. Who cares?), there's quite a discussion
going on about this. One Canadian noter is really PO'ed about it,
and figures that Turner is a dirty skater. Apparently, that opinion
is shared by other non-American people.
So waddya think? Is she a dirty skater, or just aggressive. Did
she interfere, or was it just incidental contact. And does the
Canadian skater have any grounds for her claim that Turner interfered
with her, and not the other way around?
Jerry
|
155.825 | Travis Ford must be real proud of Kathy Turner | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Fri Feb 25 1994 17:46 | 1 |
|
|
155.826 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Fri Feb 25 1994 17:54 | 11 |
|
I didn't see it, but if she didn't use a club it's no big deal!!
|
155.827 | | HANNAH::ASHE | One of the sweethearts at Digital | Fri Feb 25 1994 18:48 | 2 |
| I thought the final wasn't as bad as perhaps the semi's. Hard to say,
CBS didn't give as good a shot of it as they could have.
|
155.831 | talk about biased judging... | CNTROL::CHILDS | I need a Rasberry Lollipop | Sun Feb 27 1994 11:05 | 8 |
|
but George what about the landing, both feet touching after coming out a
double toe loop (I think) that O.B. had? I'll grant you she was artistically
a bit better but Kerrigan won on wednesday and was batter techinically
again last night so I think she deserved first. She should have cried
or been orphan, or a pixie then she'd have beaten Oksana....
mike
|
155.832 | Both skaters were damn good | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Sun Feb 27 1994 14:33 | 23 |
| George,
I do not agree that Baiul was much better han Kerrigan. It was
real close IMO. Baiul did land with both feet on one triple and
also did a double instead of a triple same as Kerrigan.
Both completed 5 triples.. I don't know Kerrigan looked better
but Baiul was also outstanding. Maybe Baiul ashook her tootsies a
little more and the judges bought it as more artistic.
The difference? Baiul landerd her last triple combination right
at the end in front of the judges. Great planning.. she
pulled a cute Sugar Rim.. made the judges all but obverlook
her double-ft mistake. Smart coaching.
How can anyone tell with a tie-breaker??
Let me ask one question. Baiul beats Kerrigan by a tiebreaker
in the long program (.10 per artistic tie-breaker) and wins the
gold by 5-4 on the ordinals. Whatever happened to the short
program results? Do they throw that out? I never heard mention
that this figured into the overall tabulations. What gives?
MikeL
|
155.833 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Sun Feb 27 1994 17:51 | 37 |
| Oksana Baiul was the right choice for the gold medal. You guys are thinking
short program. The 2 footed landings were not that important for 2 reasons.
First, since this was the long program and not the technical program there
were no mandatory deductions for missed jumps. In the long program a 2 footed
landing means you don't get as many points but you don't lose points either.
She made it up with the triple toe loop she tossed in at the end.
Also her footwork was much better than Kerrigan's which counted toward her
technical mark. The whole 1st part of her program was done on point which
almost no skater can do. Remember, jumping is just one aspect of the technical
score, spins and footwork count as well.
Second, in spite of this Kerrigan did in fact win the technical score for the
long program but in the long program the presentation score is the tie breaker
and there Baiul clearly skated a better program.
As for the short program which Kerrigan won, yes it did factor in. Kerrigan
won that and Baiul finished second leaving them with .5 and 1.0 ordinal points
respectively. Since Baiul beat Kerrigan in the long program, she got 1.0 to
Kerrigan's 2.0 (the long program counts twice what the short program counts).
So:
Skater Short Program Long Program Final Score
------ ------------- ------------ -----------
Baiul 1.0 + 1.0 = 2.0
Kerrigan 0.5 + 2.0 = 2.5
Ordinal points are like golf, low score wins so Baiul wins the gold, Kerrigan
the silver.
Had it been Chen Lu who had won the long program with Kerrigan 2nd, then
Kerrigan would have won since Chen Lu finished the short program back in 4th but
being ahead of someone by only one position in the short program doesn't help
that much.
George
|
155.834 | She "Sugar rimmed" it... | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Sun Feb 27 1994 19:45 | 30 |
| OK George thanks for the explanation but it is still too
complicated. It effectively negates the short program (technical).
If botching a landing means nothing as compared to presentation,
then this should not be classified as a true sport rather an
exhibition. I just don't understand all the nuances. Even those
that do must be confused by the ultimate judging and standings.
Tell me why a performer can look so good (ala Elaine Zayak?) in
the US but get judged so low? I still think the judging is too
subjective and political. And this is not a pro-Kerrigan
complaint as I'm sure she has been on the positive end of such
judging..
As far as Bauil getting points for short step maneuvers, aren't
they by definition more technical than artistic? Did not Kerrigan
perform these difficult maneuvers in the short program?
So which is it, are these "technical" or "artistic"?
And as far as Baiul being the clear choice, are you as qualified as
Paul Wylie, various Canadian, American, and British figure skating
n"names" who expresed surprise that Baiul was judged first? Even
the "dean" Dick Button thought it was too close to call, i.e., a
dead heat.
All in all, I jusat don't understand the "objectivity" of the
Judging. And I know I'm not alone. If I chose to read up
on all the criteria, I'd probably be as confused as I am now.
MikeL
|
155.835 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Sun Feb 27 1994 22:20 | 50 |
| Ok, let's dispel this "short program means nothing" question 1st.
The saying is that you can't win the gold medal in the short program but you
can lose it. Tonya Harding lost the gold medal in the short program. Brian
Boitano and Viktor Petrenko lost the gold medal in the short program of the
men's program. The mandatory deductions that add up when you flub the short
program can take you out of the contest.
Nancy Kerrigan and Oksana Baiul came in 1st and 2nd in the short program so
neither lost the gold medal in the short program, they both came out of that
contest in contention for 1st place running neck and neck in the ordinals with
0.5 and 1.0 respectively. That's pretty close when you consider that the numbers
went from 0.5 to about 14.0. They came in 1st and 2nd out of 27 in the short
and they came out 1st and 2nd out of 27 in the long. Because Baiul won the
long, she won the gold medal.
The fact that Kerrigan won her 1st place by a bigger score is not that big a
deal. If the Celtics beat the Hawks by 30 points in game 1 of a series then
lost the 2nd by 1 point in overtime, they'd be tied 1 game each in spite of the
lopsided score in game 1. That doesn't mean that basketball is not a sport.
As for the judging, there is the technical and presentation score. The
technical score is based on how correctly the jumps, spins, and steps are done.
For the most part the correct way to do these is spelled out and you either do
it or you don't. The more difficult ones you do, the more points you get.
Additionally, in the short program there are mandatory elements of these
jumps, spins, and steps dictated by the officials that must be included in the
program and done correctly to avoid mandatory deductions. If you miss one of
these required elements you lose lots of points. That doesn't happen in the
long program. All the moves of the long program are at the discretion of
the competitor. That's why it's sometimes called the "free program". They are
"free" to do what they want.
Presentation is far more subjective but it can still be evaluated. There are
certain things that the judges look for and the athletes and coaches know what
those things are. Is it fuzzy? yes. Does that mean it's not a sport? No. The
judges are consistent enough.
Yes it's complicated, but for those who have been involved all of their
life it's not as bad as it seems. To fans like me who only watch a few days
a year, it all seems fuzzy but I understand what's going on well enough to
see that those involved know what they are doing. To those who are just taking
their 1st look, understandably it all looks like mush.
I agree Ice Dancing is a little borderline but figure skating is objective
enough to be considered a sport. And when you consider it's popularity, I
suspect that it will be considered a sport for some time to come.
George
|
155.836 | Nancy is making $$. What is Baiul gonna make? Nothing... | SALEM::STIG | Big Sister HILLARY is Watching You!! | Mon Feb 28 1994 01:22 | 5 |
| I think the difference could've been the selection of music. Nancy
skated to something that wasn't as complicated as far as footwork.
Baiul had the better music and a more difficult program.
stig
|
155.837 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Feb 28 1994 09:07 | 6 |
| Here's my cut at ANY judged sport.
You spend your whole life training and practicing and then
ask someone else to tell you how you did. Give me a break.
Scott
|
155.838 | | VERBOS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Mon Feb 28 1994 09:23 | 4 |
| re: .781
just imagine what Jimmy Brown would think if he
knew he was gettin' dissed in a figgerskating note
|
155.840 | Four more years - I can wait | LEAF::NAZZARO | GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!! | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:18 | 10 |
| 1) Thank goodness it's finally over.
2) Please, figure skating is not a sport, it's a competition.
3) I always thought that these subjective judges made the younger
skaters wait their turn to earn gold. Always used to be that no matter
how good you skated, you didn't get gold if it wasn't your turn. Was
it Bauil's turn Friday night?
NAZZ
|
155.841 | I'm ashamed to be a "Merkin | VERBOS::ALVEY | Heather be Thy name... | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:25 | 16 |
|
What a couple of whiny sore losers we sent
to the ladies figure skating competition!
Did you read NK's remarks as she awaited
Baiul's arrival on the awards stand?
Told that Oksana was doing her makeup,
NK replied, "Why? She's just gonna cry and mess it
up again."
And her mom's real classy, too.
"No way in holy hell she (Oksana) has more style
than Nancy."
Give me Bonnie Blair and Picabo Street any day.
dr.a
|
155.842 | I'm Glad It's Over | WREATH::SCOPA | | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:31 | 18 |
| I've always wondered why figure skating is called a sport since winners
and losers are determined by subjective ratings done by a bank of
judges.
I also think that no matter how well Kerrigan skated Friday night
Oksana was destined for the gold.
I wasn't too pleased regarding Kerrigan's attitude. She's supposed to
represent her country and she made the US look like a country filled
with soresports.
She probably made two commercials with Disney, one that says, "Hey
Nancy Kerrigan you just won a gold...." and the one we saw "Hey Nancy
Kerrigan......won our hearts...."
Good riddance to Tonya and Nancy....time to move along.
M
|
155.843 | Cab Mickey do a double axel... | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:36 | 8 |
| I liked NK a lot until...
Instead of going to the closing event, she was pictued in both Boston papers
this morning mugging it up with Mickey Mouse in Disney World.
She couldda waited a day...
=Bob=
|
155.844 | If Oksana's in the WCs, I'll watch... it's a_obsession... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:36 | 36 |
|
> I think the difference could've been the selection of music. Nancy
> skated to something that wasn't as complicated as far as footwork.
> Baiul had the better music and a more difficult program.
Nancy skated to Neil Diamond. That's a mandatory 0.2 deduction on
technical merit (the guy cain't sing), and a 0.4 on artistic
impression (the guy cain't sing with feeling). But seriously, both
Kerrigan and Bauil skated like champions. For the first time in my
memory this competition wasn't just a coronation of the pre-ordained
champion, with almost everyone else using their butts to polish the ice
for the gold-medal winner's routine. Even if it isn't a sport, it's
still a competition with enormous pressure on, and both Kerrigan and
Bauil showed that they could teach a few things to the athletes from
the sports we male-chauvinist types love. Maybe they could start
tutoring Thurman Thomas next week...
As for the judging, I think the 5-4 split tells you all you need to
know about whether the decision was the "right" one. George, are you
prepared to make a statement on the qualifications of those four
judges? That they're all Yankee-loving capitalist dogs? It's
inherently obvious from the way these scores were split that politics
were at work. I have no idea who should have won, but please don't
try to tell me that the judging was actually an objective reflection of
the valued elements of figure skating in the respective countries.
With that said, for me Oksana Bauil pulled this event out of a
potential gutter. I thought she was tremendous. I have to disagree
that Kerrigan will go on to make all the money and that Bauil will get
nothing. At the risk of sounding too much like a CBS talking head,
Bauil really did captivate the world's imagination. If Kerrigan can
make $10M, then teach Bauil a few cute English phrases and she'll
make $50M.
glenn
|
155.845 | Media loves those immediate soundbites | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:36 | 15 |
| I believe Kerrigan's comments were made off-hand after she just learned
she got nosed out by Baiul, I think a little frustration is
understandable. She's human fer cryeye, and this was an immediate
reaction, give her some slack. Do you hold the Chinese and Canadian
skaters who lambasted Cathy Turner to the same standards?
Hell these people just worked years for this event so I can understand
if they're not all peachykeen with praise for their opponents.
And Baiul cries more than Tammy Baker. Yea I know you're an orphan, had
a tough life, but save the canned tears for Oprah fer gawd's sake.
What's Mrs Kerrigan supposed to say? My daughter's a lowlife?
MikeL
|
155.846 | It's about time! | LEAF::NAZZARO | GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!! | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:44 | 7 |
| Thank goodness Nancy finally showed a little guts and said what she
felt. I cain't believe any real true-blooded American would have any
problem at all with her finally speaking her mind (a true American
tradition) and not having to sound like everything she said was
scripted.
NAZZ
|
155.847 | Oksana in the WCs, Nancy on SNL... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:50 | 17 |
|
> Thank goodness Nancy finally showed a little guts and said what she
> felt. I cain't believe any real true-blooded American would have any
> problem at all with her finally speaking her mind (a true American
> tradition) and not having to sound like everything she said was
> scripted.
I agree, even though she was mistaken and wrong in what she said (about
the delays in the medal presentation). The girl has been under the
pressure-cooker for almost two months, and by and large her behavior
has been exemplary. She made a few comments, but I thought she was
generally gracious in defeat. It could have been a lot worse, and may
have been worse with many other competitors who we don't get to see or
whose language we don't understand...
glenn
|
155.848 | She was brilliant though | CTHQ::LEARY | Tonya's speed dial number: #* | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:54 | 13 |
| Agreed glenn,
I thought it was a bit humorous when Baiul finished her skate and
was bawling in the arms of her coach/mom. When the coach saw the
cameras, she mouthed something to Oksana who flashed the phoniest
smile this side of Ollie North vs Congress and waved to the camera
while sobbing. This girl's ready for Hollywood.
MikeL
|
155.849 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Mon Feb 28 1994 10:57 | 8 |
| The Olympics are a microcosm of life. We saw classy people who
were also good athletes.
We saw classless people who are good athletes.
In the big scheme of things, the real heroes shown through.
Scott
|
155.851 | | CSOA1::BACH | They who know nothing, doubt nothing... | Mon Feb 28 1994 11:10 | 2 |
| Yikes. All see said was "C'mon, she's just going to cry it off
again..". Not a horrendous paux pas...
|
155.852 | There were some great moments | AIMHI::KERR | Curse Of The Box People | Mon Feb 28 1994 11:37 | 34 |
|
Despite all of the Nancy/Tonya/Oksana sideshows, and the sappy CBS
coverage, I watched most of these Olympics and really enjoyed them.
Some real highlights for me:
Bonnie Blair's two golds
Tommy Moe, Tommy Moe, Tommy Moe (I bet he doesn't golf as well as he
skies).
Diane Roeth Steinrotter(sp), (great skier, funny name)
The ski jumping (especially the Norwegians)
The Italians and Norwegians hammering each other down the stretch after
24 miles in the 4x10 Men's X-country relay.
Koss and Jensen (just superb!)
Kathy Turner (I like her style, even if the officials disn't)
LaBomba Tomba's second run in the Men's Slalom (with the exception of
the second gate, proabably the most perfect slalom run I've ever seen)
and,
even the Ladies Finals on Friday (I thought both Bayul and Kerrigan were
terrific).
But, probably the two most emotional moments (for me anyway) were Katarina
Witt's performance of "Where have all the Flowers Gone" in the Ladies
finals and Torvell and Dean's "Bolero". Those two perfomances really put
all of the media hype and sensationalism in perspective.
Now, it's off to Japan!
Al
|
155.854 | What about this one? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 28 1994 13:23 | 16 |
|
>> It's inherently obvious
>> from the way these scores were split that politics were at work.
> Not necessarily. I've seen lots of these contests and the Eastern judges
> almost always go for the more classic style while the western judges usually
> lean toward the more athletic or elegant style. Can you name other skating
> competitions that you've seen where this was not true?
You've "seen lots of contests" but what is your explanation in
*this* one? To me, Kerrigan seems to skate much more in the classic
style a la Katerina Witt, and Bauil in the more athletic style. So
what is the explanation for the clean voting-bloc split?
glenn
|
155.855 | | HANNAH::ASHE | One of the sweethearts at Digital | Mon Feb 28 1994 13:26 | 1 |
| Jamaican Bobsleds ROOL!!!
|
155.857 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Mon Feb 28 1994 13:45 | 5 |
| Did Nancy participate in the "free skate"? If so, was she more
creative/artistic under this type of environment?
thanks,
Mike
|
155.859 | Highlight of the 'pics was Dave's mom giving Moe da ham | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Mon Feb 28 1994 13:53 | 4 |
| Hey mods, either shut down this faux sport discussion or I start a
rasslin' note.
Mark.
|
155.860 | Short track speed skating | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Mon Feb 28 1994 13:59 | 19 |
| So what'd ya' think about Cathy Turner being DQ'ed in the semi-final
heat of the 1000 meter race? It struck me that the judges were
just looking for a reason to disqualify her to appease those who
had complained earlier.
The other thing that doesn't make sense to me was that the judges
had her up until 3:00 a.m. taking doping samples. She had to
give 3 different samples. Seems kind of strange to me. It's almost
as if they were trying to find something.
I really like the short track racing. It kept me on the edge of my
seat, especially the men's 5k relay. It's sort of a cross between
roller derby and figure skating. The only reason I say figure skating
is that there seems to be a lot of power given to the judges and
their decisions often seem arbitrary and based on something other
than what is happening at the time. Maybe they'll start giving
style points.
Jerry
|
155.861 | If it were that obvious it'd have been 9-0 | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 28 1994 14:03 | 24 |
|
>> You've "seen lots of contests" but what is your explanation in
>> *this* one? To me, Kerrigan seems to skate much more in the classic
>> style a la Katerina Witt, and Bauil in the more athletic style. So
>> what is the explanation for the clean voting-bloc split?
>
> No, Bauil skated in a more classic style. In fact, she lost to Kerrigan on
> the technical mark which is usually associated with the more athletic elements.
Okay, I hear you on the differences in style. I still think that when
you have a 5-4 vote won on a tie-breaker, in a competition that you,
George Maiewski, are able to say that Bauil clearly and objectively
won, that there's a discontinuity in logic there. It appeared to me
that the entire world of skating critics including the judges were
split almost cleanly down the middle. I think you've been about the
only one I've heard claim that there's little or no subjectivity
involved, right down to the competitors involved (and I'm not even one
arguing that this is not a sport, and I don't have a big problem with
subjective judging-- who cares? It's like boxing; where there are
great performances put in by great athletes, the scoring needn't
detract from that...)
glenn
|
155.862 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Long lost recipe | Mon Feb 28 1994 14:10 | 10 |
| Kerrigan = Rich sore 2nd place finish. She thought she had the gold
wrapped up before she even landed in Norway. She didn't
win because of popularity. She lost because the other
skater was better.
Turner = Raiders style of play, aggressive and push the rules to the
limit to see what you can get away with. I didn't see any
other skaters having the incidents that she continually had!
Tim
|
155.863 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Hall of Fame #75 | Mon Feb 28 1994 14:17 | 9 |
|
Kerrigan = Big Teeth like you know who.
US Hockey = Underachievers like the Donks!
Chap
|
155.866 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Long lost recipe | Mon Feb 28 1994 16:14 | 3 |
| Did I forget to put in the word probably?
Tim
|
155.867 | Nothing "clear" about it; individual marks subjectively differed | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Mon Feb 28 1994 18:01 | 28 |
|
> Either you misunderstood what I said or I didn't say it right. I felt that
> Oksana Baiul clearly won the presentation portion of the Long program. I agree
> that Kerrigan won the technical part of the long program.
>
> Because the presentation part is the tie breaker in the long program and
> because of the way the arithmetic with ordinals works, clearly Baiul deserved
> the gold medal.
Obviously the judges didn't screw up the arithmetic with the ordinals,
and them's the rules, so yes, Bauil wins. There's no argument about
that. What I disagree with is this simplistic explanation of an
overall technical/presentation split, with the suggestion that Bauil
won the presentation overall so she wins the tie-breaker. That's not
the way it works; it goes judge-by-judge, and four judges said that
Bauil did not "clearly deserve" the gold medal. That's four people in
disagreement with your strongly-held opinion, and all four of them
world-class figure skating judges. All the judges didn't even have
Bauil winning the presentation. That's where I have the problem with
the claims that the judging is actually objective enough that to say
that one competitor "clearly" won this element and the other "clearly"
won that element. Those claims were *not* borne out in each of the
scores, across the board. No big deal, but that still leaves a high
element of politicism and/or differing priorities, therefore
subjectivity in the judging of the sport...
glenn
|
155.869 | I've heard no better explanation on the merits of the judging | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 10:07 | 29 |
|
>> Those claims were *not* borne out in each of the
>> scores, across the board. No big deal, but that still leaves a high
>> element of politicism and/or differing priorities, therefore
>> subjectivity in the judging of the sport...
> Again no one disagrees with the part of it being subjective but where in this
> argument have you proven that politics is involved?
I haven't proven anything (neither have you) but the national bloc
alignment of the judges was the only split with any kind of an obvious
correlation at all. You voiced some opinions about styles and the
technical/artistic value differences between the separate parts of
the world (saying that it was clear that Kerrigan won technical, and
Bauil won artistic) but it didn't show up in the scores. Guess what?
Technical marks were 3-3-3 (K-B-Tie), and artistic also 3-3-3, with no
consensus from either voting bloc favoring one element over the other.
It don't get more symmetrical than 3-3-3, leaving no room for
hand-waving interpretation whatsoever...
It's evident to me at least that if the skating were very close (as it
was), Kerrigan was going to take the US judge and Bauil the Ukraine and
the rest would fall in place with some general correlation. As it
turned out that general correlation was exact, and that left the
competition to one judge. That's what I (and most informed commentators
I've heard) believe, but you're free to believe whatever you wish.
glenn
|
155.871 | Sorry, George, you really need to bone up on this stuff ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 10:36 | 21 |
|
> No I don't believe that is correct. Using your notation I believe that the
> technical marks were 5-4 (K-B) and the artistic marks were 4-5 (K-B) with
> Kerrigan winning the 4 ordinals from the west and Bauil winning the 4 ordinals
> from the east.
No, you're wrong (imagine that, someone who as opposed to the rest of
us ignorant peons actually knows something about figure skating being
wrong!). There was no such clean split. A judge can vote a tie in one
element and have his/her overall vote decided by the other element.
And that's exactly what happened, in several instances.
> I heard that explanation from CBS and from the Boston Globe. Where did you
> get your 3-3-3 score?
I looked at the marks. A novel concept. It helps to filter out all
the bias and misinformation you can get in this conference, and
requires only basic math skills... ;-)
glenn
|
155.873 | A shocking credibility gap... I'm starting to worry... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:04 | 15 |
|
> In fact, a regular fan over in the skating notes file who has judges for
> friends also said that Kerrigan lost on the tie breaker. So maybe we are all
> wrong and you are right. If so, congradulations, you are the only guy who knows
> that there is no tie breaker and that the medal went to the wrong skater.
George, the presentation tie-breaker that everyone has been referring
to is not the overall presentation marks but the *single* presentation
mark of that *one* judge to decide that *one* ordinal (overall, they
were tied there too, 3-3-3)! That's exactly the way it has been
reported. Are you really telling me you didn't know that? If so,
you've been causing this confusion all along.
glenn
|
155.874 | Change of Pace | WREATH::SCOPA | | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:17 | 5 |
| C'mon guys let's get down to serious business like discussing whether
or not Oksana, not Nancy, should have gotten that lucrative Revlon
contract!
;^)
|
155.876 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:29 | 15 |
|
re .872
>> Interesting point, that noter over in skating said that using
>>presentation for the tie breaker was started after 1988 and that if presentation had
>>been used back then, Brian Orser of Canada would have won the gold medal
>>instead of Brian Boitano from the U.S.
Wow, can you imagine the buzzing coming from ASABET::SPORTS_88.NOTE?
Oh my! Talk about a scorching <KP>ENTER
|
155.877 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:29 | 22 |
|
> Now every listing I've seen results in 5 1st place Ordinals for Baiul and 4
> 1st place ordinals for Kerrigan. If you've seen differently, fine. Baiul got
> the medal which seems to back up the 5-4 score for ordinals in the long program.
> If you feel it ended up 3-3-3, then how do you explain the gold medal going
> to Baiul, a mistake?
I'm finished playing games with you, George. You can re-read the
following two paragraphs and decide for yourself which is correct.
Go back to the scores and look at them for yourself, if necessary...
>> Guess what?
>> Technical marks were 3-3-3 (K-B-Tie), and artistic also 3-3-3, with no
>> consensus from either voting bloc favoring one element over the other.
>> It don't get more symmetrical than 3-3-3, leaving no room for
>> hand-waving interpretation whatsoever...
>
> No I don't believe that is correct. Using your notation I believe that the
> technical marks were 5-4 (K-B) and the artistic marks were 4-5 (K-B) with
> Kerrigan winning the 4 ordinals from the west and Bauil winning the 4 ordinals
> from the east.
|
155.878 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:37 | 6 |
| � I was close enough with my call for the final standings that and won't be
�eating crow for quite a while.
Well for starters, close don't count in here. Secondly, you completely
missed my point. I was talking about your prediction of the World
Championships being a prime time event.
|
155.880 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:39 | 5 |
| � I don't think she is a dirty skater. I don't think there's any such thing as
�a dirty skater. If she didn't get called on them then they were good moves. Bad
�calls perhaps, but in any sport any foul you get away with is a good foul.
Ah yes. Another Sportsnoter showing that good sportsmanship is dead.
|
155.882 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:54 | 20 |
| NOTE: Not actual values:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
#1 T 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.9 5.8
#1 P 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.7 5.8 5.8 5.8
11.6 11.5 11.6 11.5 11.6 11.5 11.6 11.6 11.6
1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2
#1 T 5.8 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.9
#1 P 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.6 5.8 5.9 5.6 5.9 5.8
11.4 11.5 11.7 11.4 11.5 11.8 11.4 11.6 11.7
2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1
Note Technical marks are split 3-3-3
Note Presentation marks are split 3-3-3
Note skater wins ordinals 5-4 (with judge #8 equivalent to the German judge)
This would demonstrate how Glenn could be right, George. (Of course, this
may not be something you can accept.)
|
155.883 | one more vote for IB | AIMHI::CORRIGAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:55 | 4 |
|
re .595
Awesome. It WAS Lillehammer for me!!
|
155.884 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:56 | 9 |
| >� I was close enough with my call for the final standings that and won't be
>�eating crow for quite a while.
>
> Well for starters, close don't count in here. Secondly, you completely
> missed my point. I was talking about your prediction of the World
> Championships being a prime time event.
I was close for the NBA finals too. Like Mac said, it doesn't work in
here.
|
155.885 | We have a winner! | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 11:58 | 8 |
|
> Note Technical marks are split 3-3-3
> Note Presentation marks are split 3-3-3
Thank you, Rich! This scenario is what happened...
glenn
|
155.886 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:03 | 9 |
| � I saw the finals of figure skating last night and I believe Oksana Baiul
�deserved the gold metal. She was spectacular. She did the entire 1st minute of
�her long program on point, her jumps were as good as Kerrigan and she was 10
�times more expressive in her presentation. She should have won by a lot more
�than she did.
If baseball is as subjective as you claim, George, the Red Sox should
have won the 1975 World Series since Fisk was extremely expressive on
his homerun.
|
155.887 | In the tradition of true sprotsters | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:04 | 14 |
| re .881
>> Ok, say it's 5 seconds to go in the final game of the 1994 NBA championship
>>and the Bulls lead the Suns by 1. Barkley gets the ball and goes up to shoot
>>and Pippen slaps him on the writs. The shot misses, no whistle blows, the
>>buzzer goes off, the Bulls 4-peat.
Why not use a real game, lessay the 93 Eastern Conference finals.
Game 7 NY vs Chicago, Bulls by 1, Charles Smith has the ball under
the basket, and gets hacked for 7 seconds by 4 Bulls, with no
whistle.
|
155.888 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:05 | 5 |
| � Ice dancing is in trouble. The IOC has said they are concerned with the lack
�of clearness in the rules and will take a look at weather or not it should be
�retained as an Olympic sport.
Gee, where have we heard this before?
|
155.889 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:12 | 4 |
| > Game 7 NY vs Chicago, Bulls by 1, Charles Smith has the ball under
yeah, that's the rebounding forward that hauled down 0 rebounds in 48
minutes on Sunday.
|
155.890 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:13 | 13 |
| �If the Celtics beat the Hawks by 30 points in game 1 of a series then
�lost the 2nd by 1 point in overtime, they'd be tied 1 game each in spite of the
�lopsided score in game 1. That doesn't mean that basketball is not a sport.
That's because the only place style points are awarded in the NBA is in
the All Star Slam Dunk contest.
� I agree Ice Dancing is a little borderline but figure skating is objective
�enough to be considered a sport. And when you consider it's popularity, I
�suspect that it will be considered a sport for some time to come.
If popularity defines "sport", then the Beatles and Frank Sinatra are
world class athletes.
|
155.891 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:25 | 11 |
| � Yeh, the one with the most votes won. When the Twins beat the Braves in the
�extra inning of game 7 of the World Series no one argued that it was too close
�to declare a champion even though everyone agreed that the teams were probably
�evenly matched. That's the same in any sport. How about hockey where the Gold
�medal was not based on real hockey just a 2 man shooting match. At least in
�skating it was resolved during regular play.
This sums up quite well why Nazz and others haven't been convinced by
your arguments that figure skating is not a sport. How can you
possibly equate a vote with a runner scoring or a puck going into the
net?
|
155.892 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:25 | 16 |
| I can't believe we're wasting all this space on figure skating, when
one of the most exciting hockey matches I've ever seen took place
on Sunday in the Gold Medal Game.
This reminded me of two heavy-weights slugging it out, trading punch for
punch.
I wasn't *thrilled* about the shoot-out format (and I hope the NHL doesn't
adopt it), but even the shoot out was exciting.
By far, the most exciting (and thankfully under-hyped) event of the
weekend....
'Saw
|
155.893 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:26 | 7 |
| > This sums up quite well why Nazz and others haven't been convinced by
> your arguments that figure skating is not a sport. How can you
> possibly equate a vote with a runner scoring or a puck going into the
> net?
In the World According to George, anything is possible.....
|
155.895 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:47 | 6 |
| �I can't believe we're wasting all this space on figure skating, when
�one of the most exciting hockey matches I've ever seen took place
�on Sunday in the Gold Medal Game.
That's because a once honorable and manly sport reduced itself to the
level of soccer to decide its championship.
|
155.898 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:52 | 12 |
| Like I said, I wasn't thrilled with the shoot-out format. As one of the
announcers on WFAN said -- it was the last event, and they could have
played for hours, no one else needed the ice....
But, even still, you can't take away the fact that it was a very exciting
game.
There was this one BRUTAL check by a Canadian on a Swede. It bordered on
a charge, but was without a doubt one of the best hits I've ever seen....
'Saw
|
155.900 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 12:58 | 40 |
| > If you can't win an argument, just change around what the other guy said,
>right Mac? Show me one place where I ever said the way in which a home run
>is hit counts for anything.
He's not changing around what you said. He's simply applying the logic
you've been spouting in here to other things. It's a fairly common
technique.
Or don't you acknowledge techniques which would in any way, shape, form
or fashion lessen your image as an expert on everything?
> Any reason why you are completely ducking the subject of the subjective
>strike zone? I can think of one, it's because it proves how wrong you are
>and how subjective baseball really is.
Everything is subjective. No one ever said baseball wasn't subjective.
Until they develop a computerized/electronic monitor system for the
strike zone, it always will be.
The best umps, while subjective in their strike zone, are consistent
in their strike zone.
The bottom line is that while baseball may have a subjective element,
there are far more objective elements that, when the dust settles and
all is said and done, enable the winner of a baseball game to be
pretty clearly determined.
And before you bring it up, if an unscrupulous umpire were to call
a large strike zone for one team, and a very tiny zone for the opponents,
thus enabling one team to win the game, there are checks and balances
in place to catch that, and ultimately get rid of that ump. Nothing
like that exists in the "sport" of figure skating.....
'Saw
|
155.902 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:10 | 4 |
| � Now what's the argument?
You are using the ordinals. Glenn is using the raw scores which were
used to compute the ordinals.
|
155.903 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:12 | 9 |
| � Any reason why you are completely ducking the subject of the subjective
�strike zone? I can think of one, it's because it proves how wrong you are
�and how subjective baseball really is.
I'm not ducking it. I was using hyperbole to show how ridiculous your
argument is. The strike zone is quite clearly defined in the rule
book. You are confusing this with the way some umpires tend to
interpret that rule. Please show me the sections in the skating rule
book that define the criteria for awarding points in presentation.
|
155.905 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:17 | 22 |
| > So rather than saying baseball is objective and figure skating is subjective
>we have to say there is a fuzzy line and baseball seems to lean one way while
>figure skating leans the other. Or to put it another way, it's a subjective
>call as to what is a sport and what is not, rather than an iron clad right and
>wrong.
We don't have to say anything at all George. Figure skating doesn't
"lean". Figure skating is as far to one side of that line as Rush Limbaugh
is from the center. Baseball is as far to the other side of the line.
> Not so. There is a governing body that controls the judges of figure skating
>and it is quite common for someone to be reprimanded or removed from future
>competition for judging based on them being too political or showing other
>bias.
Yep, and for all those years that the Communist Bloc country judges would
"objectively" decide that a communist block double lutz was better than
a western double lutz, that governing body was a veritable gelding.....
'Saw
|
155.906 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:18 | 6 |
| � Any reason why you are completely ducking the subject of the subjective
�strike zone?
OK, you don't like my HR example. How's this: I don't see any
pitchers being awarded extra strikes or balls because an umpire likes
or dislikes the way he releases the ball.
|
155.907 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:20 | 8 |
| � Then there's no argument. My original point was that the raw scores produced
�ordinals for each judge, those were combined to come up with an over all
�ordinal and that ordinals pointed to a winner.
I thought your original point was that the Ukranian skater was clearly
a winner. Glenn was showing that it wasn't as clear as you say. That
it actually was an extremely close contest which only looked as clear
cut to you was because of the way the ordinals are computed.
|
155.911 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:38 | 17 |
| � There is a theoretical strike zone and umpires use judgment as to weather
�the ball was in that zone or not. And as replays prove, they are often wrong.
Meteorology has nothing to do with it. The replays don't prove much
since they usually are not coming from the same vantage point the
umpire has. The only consistent discrepancy in the enforcement of the
strike zone is in the height. It has been argued that this is a ploy
to keep fans interested in the game (make the pitchers pitch to a
hitter's sweet spot so the ball goes into play more often).
� My argument is not ridiculous no matter how hyperbolic you get. What good is
�a definition if there is no human being alive that can call it correctly?
There is no reason that the strikezone as defined in the rulebook
cannot be called correctly (Rickey Henderson's crouch can lead to
difficulty, but that's another story). Again, please show me in the
skating rule book the scale for performance section of the grade.
|
155.912 | Did Kerrigan "win" the technical (no), and Baiul artistic? (no) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:38 | 24 |
|
> Glenn then started haranguing me about how clearly I was wrong because (and
> as far as I can see he pretty much repeated what I said with emphasis on the
> raw scores).
Quite simply, is the following statement (yours) incorrect, or isn't it?
> No I don't believe that is correct. Using your notation I believe that the
> technical marks were 5-4 (K-B) and the artistic marks were 4-5 (K-B)
I thought I was making a legitimate point that there was no real
consistency in any of the judging, between the elements or otherwise.
It was an innocent enough observation; I wasn't looking for an argument
on the scoring because I know how that worked. Now if you just don't
want to deal with that lack of consistency (a perfect 3-3-3 scoring
split in each element), that's fine, but it does nothing for your
claims that there really is some well-understood method to the scoring
based on what the judges were seeing. There could not have been a more
divided opinion of what went on on the ice, except if you look at the
collective opinion of each political camp. That's the only correlation
from the scoring that I can see.
glenn
|
155.913 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:44 | 33 |
| > Then there's no argument. My original point was that the raw scores produced
> ordinals for each judge, those were combined to come up with an over all
> ordinal and that ordinals pointed to a winner. Because the German judge who
> was the swing vote had a split vote, a tie breaker was used to determine that
> ordinal and thus the championship.
>
> I then went on to say that under this system it was clear who won.
>
> Glenn then started haranguing me about how clearly I was wrong because (and
> as far as I can see he pretty much repeated what I said with emphasis on the
> raw scores).
>
> Now what's the beef?
>
> George
George, the "argument" or "the beef" wasn't in how the winner was determined,
but in your assertion in .833:
> Second, in spite of this Kerrigan did in fact win the technical score for the
>long program but in the long program the presentation score is the tie breaker
>and there Baiul clearly skated a better program.
Glenn demonstrated how three judges marked Kerrigan higher in presentation
than they did Baiul; three judges marked Baiul higher in presentation than
Kerrigan; and three judges marked them even. Since only 1/3 of the judges
marked Baiul as having a better presentation, Glenn used the actual values
to demonstrate that it was by no means clear (i.e., it certainly wasn't
clear to 66 2/3% of the olympic judges). People didn't agree with your
statement that Baiul "clearly skated a better program," and there seems to
be some valid evidence that the judges weren't persuaded, either. Three
judges and George seemed to think so; 6 judges didn't seem to think she was
any better.
|
155.915 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:55 | 13 |
| > Just about every judge seems to agree it was a dead heat with Kerrigan having
>the edge technically and Baiul having the edge in presentation. Since
>presentation (on a judge by judge basis) is the tie breaker, Baiul gets the
>gold medal.
>
> That's the gist of what I was saying, do you disagree with that?
>
> George
If you are trying to say that every judge considered it about a dead heat,
I agree. If you are trying to say every judge considered Kerrigan to have
an edge technically, and Baiul to have an edge artisitcally, I'd say you
are way off, and Glenn's information PROVES it.
|
155.916 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 13:57 | 10 |
| �this was a very close contest.
So which was it George, a very close contest or a clear victory for
Baiul (sp?)?
� Just about every judge seems to agree it was a dead heat with Kerrigan having
�the edge technically and Baiul having the edge in presentation.
But as has been pointed out, there was no edge. It was 3-3-3 across
the board.
|
155.919 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:06 | 12 |
| > I believe that if you take a look at the context from the notes around that
>statement you will see that people were expressing opinions at that point. In
>keeping with that thread, I entered my opinion that that Baiul clearly skated a
>better artistic program than Kerrigan.
> George
I don't pretend to be an expert, either. I am expressing my opinion that
Baiul didn't skate a better artistic program. That's my opinion. I also
state as fact that 2/3 of the judges didn't think that Baiul didn't skate
a better artistic program. At least in comparison to Olympic judges, your
view was in the minority.
|
155.920 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:12 | 23 |
| > It was a very close contest.
Agreed.
> Most people seem to agree that Kerrigan was a little better technically
> and that Baiul was a little better artistically.
Disagree. I think you are completely wrong here.
> I believe those edges were enough so that it was clear.
Fine, you have a right to your opinion. I have a right to dispute it,
and I have a right to dispute your assertion that most people agree with
you, until you have data to support the assertion. You have presented no
such data. I personally believe that most people did not think that, and
there was NO CLEAR DIFFERENCE between the two skaters. I believe that most
reasonable people think it was a POLITICAL decision, though I also have no
data to back this up.
> If some of the judges disagree with me fine, I'm entitled to my opinion.
You sure are. Note that 2/3 of the judges disagreed with you, not just
a small minority.
|
155.922 | Thank you... that's all I wanted to know... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:15 | 17 |
|
> I don't pretend to be an expert, but I believe that she did skate a better
> artistic program and that Kerrigan got a sympathy vote from some of the western
> judges (i.e. a bad call) on presentation.
Finally! The crux of the matter. This is personal opinion, I can
respect that, and I might even agree with it. I just wanted to
establish that there was a contradiction between anything about the
judging of this competition being "clear" at the same time the
marks were so close and so scattered between the elements. And you've
given a possible explanation: impartiality from the Western judges.
That's also something you'd be hard-pressed to prove exists in
baseball, etc., at least to such an extent (the final result of the
competition-- picking the winner-- as determined by those four judges).
glenn
|
155.923 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:16 | 7 |
| I think they are all sports. I can agree with you in that.
It's a completely separate issue.
In my mind, it's much easier to be an outstanding rugby player
or basketball player as compared to being an outstanding figure
skater.
|
155.925 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:28 | 19 |
| > I believe that if you take a look at the context from the notes around that
> I don't pretend to be an expert,
> I base my opinion on the fact that
> The discussion of how the score was calculated followed. That's a separate
>discussion.
Has anyone seen George and ACC Chris together at the same time?
All we need now is a "Me and Nancy", and the picture is complete......
'Saw
|
155.926 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:29 | 13 |
| > One more thing about the scoring, the way you guys have added it up shows
>that the votes were 3-3-3 in terms of who won but that's not the way it's
>calculated. They don't count how many marks you win from each judge, they total
>the marks from each judge and when you do that it comes out 5-4 4-5 with the
>German being the tie breaker.
Everyone in here agrees with you on that. We all acknowledge that the
scoring was correct, and that Baiul won according to the rules. No one is
claiming that the voting gave Kerrigan three firsts, Baiul three first place
votes, and three were even. Everyone agrees that Kerrigan got 4 first place
ordinals, and Baiul got 5, all legal and correct. However, so far as the
PRESENTATION marks are concerened, then three voted Kerrigan better, three
voted Baiul better, and three voted them even.
|
155.928 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:35 | 25 |
| � I've said that all along
Then why have so many people missed what you've been saying "all
along"?
�it is clear as to who won, you just crank the numbers through the formula.
Don't tell me. You had Chen on your rotisserie team, right?
�because the strike zone is so subjective.
The strike zone is not subjective. It is clearly defined. It is the
distance between the armpits and the knees in height, and the
dimensions and location of homeplate in width. It has nothing to do
with how the umpire feels the pitcher threw the ball. Yes, some
umpires do interpret these dimensions (at least the height dimension) a
bit beyond the way they are written. This is why so many baseball
fans, players, and coaches criticize the strikezone. They are not
criticzing how it is defined (it's very clearly spelled out in the rule
book), but the way the umpires are enforcing it.
Now please tell me how artistic impression is defined. If there are
distinct objective, quantifiable criteria and the argument is about how
the judges are applying this criteria, then you have a very good case
in comparing this to baseball.
|
155.931 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:38 | 7 |
| � So are opinions not allowed?
Opinions are allowed, no question about that. You should be prepared
to back them up, though. Or at the very least do what Mike Childs does
and admit right up front that is your own personal, biased opinion.
It's opinions that are disguised as facts that draw the most heat
around here.
|
155.932 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:39 | 31 |
|
> What about all the talk of umpires squeezing the strike zone on Clemens after
> his fight with the umpire during the A.L.C.S? Regardless if they squeezed him
> or not, it was an issue and it was hard to say with any certainty if he was
> squeezed or not because the strike zone is so subjective.
That's what I meant by "at least not to such an extent". Nobody throws
up a card that says "Clemens wins" or "Clemens loses" (and, yes, that
is in effect what they do in figure skating-- you better believe that
each of those judges remembers the combined score and the tie-breaker
he gave to each top skater). If you have such finality combined with
impartiality there's opportunity for major injustice to the competitors
(happens all the time in boxing). You've made much of the call on the
Jackie Robinson steal of home, for example, but that one actually goes
in baseball's favor, because Brooklyn still lost the game. There was
no such finality to the decision, and there rarely is in baseball.
> One more thing about the scoring, the way you guys have added it up shows
> that the votes were 3-3-3 in terms of who won but that's not the way it's
> calculated. They don't count how many marks you win from each judge, they total
> the marks from each judge and when you do that it comes out 5-4 4-5 with the
> German being the tie breaker.
Please let's not backtrack. I think everyone in this discussion
understands the scoring system (and always did). The 3-3-3 was only
used to demonstrate the judges' thinking on each of the elements, and
has no bearing on the overall scoring decision.
glenn
|
155.935 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:44 | 15 |
| No opinions allowed as how the scoring works and how the winner
is determined, no.
Sure, your opinion is just as valid as Glenn's, Mac's, etc.,
as far as whether one skater was better than another. (Of course,
I view my own with just a little more relative weight.) In addition,
it makes not one iota of difference what any of us think in so far
as concrete results of the contest, only in how we think about it
(and what it may or may not reflect on the rest of our world today).
Moreover, we can think that the majority of people agree with us,
but that may or may not be the case. When we make assertions that
"such-and-such is true," as contrasted to "I believe that such-and-such
is true," we risk having people who have opposing opinions defend their
opinions and pointing out where our assertions are no more than just
personal beliefs.
|
155.937 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:48 | 17 |
| <<< Note 155.934 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
>
> Regardless of your impossible to implement strike zone effectively it is
>as subjective as judging figure skating presentation.
>
> George
>
Perhaps the reason people don't agree is that most everyone in this
conference knows how the strike zone is defined. People don't know
how "presentation" scores are defined. If anyone can provide the information
that would demonstrate that there are strict rules by which presentation
marks should be given, then there might be a more general agreement.
Somehow, however, I doubt that this exists in the same way that a strike
zone is defined.
|
155.938 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:48 | 5 |
|
opinions are like rat-holes. Everybody goes down one.
|
155.939 | Carry on with the good fight for figure skating, George ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:51 | 15 |
|
>> That's what I meant by "at least not to such an extent". Nobody throws
>> up a card that says "Clemens wins" or "Clemens loses".
>
> Here we definitely disagree. If a pitcher is being squeezed his chances of
> winning go down dramatically. Holding up his arm to say "ball 4" to a pitch
> that nipped the outside corner has just as much of an impact as a judge
> punching the button to say 5.6 for artistic impression.
So that one call on one pitch on one batter of a minimum of 27 batters
that a pitcher must face in a game has "just as much" (equal) impact
to a full one-half of a skater's total score? Please...
glenn
|
155.940 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 01 1994 14:52 | 17 |
| >> That's what I meant by "at least not to such an extent". Nobody throws
>> up a card that says "Clemens wins" or "Clemens loses".
>
> Here we definitely disagree. If a pitcher is being squeezed his chances of
>winning go down dramatically. Holding up his arm to say "ball 4" to a pitch
>that nipped the outside corner has just as much of an impact as a judge
>punching the button to say 5.6 for artistic impression.
>
> George
Not sure I would agree here. His chances of holding the score down would
dramatically decrease, but -- assuming impartiality on the part of the
umpire -- so would the chances of the other side holding the score down.
The pitcher may be just as likely to win in a high scoring game. In fact,
if he his team is much better offensively, his chances of winning may go
UP if the strike zone is squeezed.
|
155.941 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:02 | 6 |
| � So what? There's a definition but no human alive has eyes good enough to
�call it according to those rules.
Just because it isn't being called according to those rules, doesn't
mean it can't be. In fact, at various times through history it has
been called according to the rules.
|
155.943 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:24 | 5 |
| when did they put in the shoot-out for Hockey? what a stooooopid idea. Here
they take a real sport and change the rules to what soccer - a classic
sissy sport - uses.
The Crazy Met
|
155.944 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:26 | 16 |
|
Like everyone else in here, I have been deeply saddened by
the departure from DEC of several friends that I met through
the years here in this notesfile. With each one that left,
this notesfile was somehow lessened and I felt it incumbent
upon each of us to pick up the slack and to carry on in mem-
ory of our comrades long since departed. Yes, we have seen
sad sad days here in in SPORTS but we have always kept our
heads held high - bloodied but unbowed and all that rot. But
the saddest of those days does not even begin to compare with
the deep sense of grief I feel when I see a prolonged discussion
on something so lame-assed as ladies figure skating, whose status
as even a sport is seriously questioned. Some of the legendary fig-
ures of SPORTSnotes past would turn over in their electronic graves
if they could see what a pansy outfit this has turned into. I
feel so ashamed.
|
155.945 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:27 | 13 |
| >when did they put in the shoot-out for Hockey? what a stooooopid idea. Here
>they take a real sport and change the rules to what soccer - a classic
>sissy sport - uses.
Well, not being an expert, I couldn't tell you exactly when, but I know
it was in effect in 1992.
It does suck.
I hope the NHL doesn't adopt it.....
'Saw
|
155.946 | Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair..... | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:33 | 27 |
| > as even a sport is seriously questioned. Some of the legendary fig-
> ures of SPORTSnotes past would turn over in their electronic graves
> if they could see what a pansy outfit this has turned into. I
> feel so ashamed.
Couldn't agree with you more, Tommy.
I think that SPORTS has seen it's G�tterdammerung.....
It's as if they said:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.
And we said:
Yabbut, we don't care if you sleep, we'd rather listen
to bullhooey about ordinals.....
Sports has become like Ozymandias.....8^(
|
155.947 | :-) | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:36 | 3 |
| Hey 'Saw when did you get interested in the mystical stuff of Revelations??
The Crazy Met
|
155.948 | Like The Eveready Battery | WREATH::SCOPA | | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:38 | 8 |
| "And that makes out number three and the __________are the 1994
World Series Champions. We now return you to the 1994 Winter
Olympics note which has recently past the 10,000th reply and
the argument continues...
.....but first a word from Nancy Kerrigan and Revlon."
;^)
|
155.950 | LDUC alert | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:44 | 2 |
|
The Crazy Met
|
155.951 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:45 | 41 |
| > And I feel deeply saddened with I see someone use the Junior Highschool
>tactic of trashing a sport that you don't understand simply because it's not
>regularly followed by the elitists sports bar crowd.
George, ask yourself if that's really why we're trashing it?
> I remember having a big argument in the TV notes file superbowl note, many of
Gee, George, it sounds like you're always having arguments.
> I went through the same process I went through here of trying to explain what
>was going on, even to the extent of writing a 100+ line note explaining the
>rules. Still guys were convinced that it was not a sport.
Maybe that should tell you something.
> Grow a little. Consider the fact that maybe someone elses sport might have
>some redeeming value, especially if it's over 100 years old.
Never said it didn't.
And hey, George, you grow a little. Consider the fact that Crusaders are
basically annihilated in here, for nothing more than the subjective fact
that we consider it a sport. As much of a sport as ladies figure skating
at any rate....
> And if you can't stand the variety of sports, why not try a more specific
>notes file or learn to hit next-unseen.
Hey, no one's asking you to like it, and we're sure as hell not gonna change
it, so why not try a more specific notes file, or learn to hit next-unseen.....
'Saw
|
155.952 | But you're right, I do feel ashamed... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:45 | 9 |
|
> Some of the legendary fig-
> ures of SPORTSnotes past would turn over in their electronic graves
> if they could see what a pansy outfit this has turned into. I
> feel so ashamed.
Defender of Torville and Dean, join us in prostrating thineself on thine
sword!
|
155.953 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:51 | 18 |
| >
>Hey 'Saw when did you get interested in the mystical stuff of Revelations??
>
>The Crazy Met
Huh?
Nothing I said could be farther from Revelation....
I mentioned nordic myth, "In Flanders Fields" and "Ozymandias".....
The only thing I know from Revelation is the Four Horseman of the Notre Dame
Backfield.....8^)
'Saw
|
155.954 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:54 | 8 |
|
Hey Brydie, quityer bitchin' about this here sports tavern.
It ain't like we don't water the ferns or nuthin'....
|
155.955 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 01 1994 15:56 | 16 |
|
re .952
Hahaha! I watched the Olympics and I thought T&D won and
I'm ashamed that I even cared. But this danged note is on
the verge of breaking 1,000 replies thanks largely to the
neverending discussion about what George did or didn't say
and what he does or doesn't know . Given his track record,
I don't know why you people bother arguing with him. Unless,
it's to see him perform the rare 'triple Maiewski' where he
says something, then denies he said when it's proven wrong
and then says you're nitpicking or getting personal when
you prove he did actually say it. A move few would attempt
yet George has made it a trademark in his short time here.
No offense, George but you really are all over the place
with your logic.
|
155.956 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:00 | 10 |
| 'Saw
re: George and arguments:
you should read ::baseball if you want to see some more arguments - oh about
once a week.
fwiw: not a judgement, just plain old facks.
The Crazy Met
|
155.958 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:11 | 12 |
|
>> What a bunch of whinners.
There's no 'h' in winners.
>> Anyone want to take me up on my offer? If figure skating is in the 1996
>> Olympics, I'm right it's a sport. If not, you guys are right it's not a
>> sport.
Yeah, I'll take you up. The 1996 Olympics will be the summer games. The
winter games don't take place until 1998. Wrong again, dude.
|
155.959 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:13 | 11 |
|
re .954
>> Hey Brydie, quityer bitchin' about this here sports tavern.
Hey Gaulke, the name is Tommy. If you're going to call me Brydie
put a Mister in front of it.
|
155.960 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:16 | 8 |
|
>>If you're going to call me Brydie put a Mister in front of it.
^^^^^^
Hey, that's how you water ferns.
|
155.961 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:17 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 155.958 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> Yeah, I'll take you up. The 1996 Olympics will be the summer games. The
> winter games don't take place until 1998. Wrong again, dude.
Ha, hide behind a typo, grip about spelling.
Figure skating will be in the next winter Olympics. The IOC will keep it
and we use that to determine if it's a sport, put up or shut up.
George
|
155.962 | Clearly a sprot... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:27 | 6 |
|
> Yeah, I'll take you up. The 1996 Olympics will be the summer games. The
> winter games don't take place until 1998. Wrong again, dude.
Maybe that's just figure sinking, a k a synchro swimming...
|
155.963 | | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:35 | 3 |
| > Maybe that's just figure sinking, a k a synchro swimming...
maybe they should adopt countersynchro swimming(tm)
|
155.964 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:42 | 1 |
| And 'Saw leaps in with .946 to further prove Tommy's point.
|
155.965 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:45 | 6 |
| � I remember having a big argument in the TV notes file superbowl note, many of
�who's followers live in Australia, because they felt that American Football was
�overly complex and that it was obviously a sissy's sport since they had to stop
�play every few seconds. Obviously it wasn't a real sport like rugby.
Obviously an enlightened crowd.
|
155.966 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I lift, you grab. ... | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:48 | 7 |
|
>>Obviously an enlightened crowd.
Nah, they had just spent most of their day licking toads.
JaKe
|
155.967 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 01 1994 16:49 | 7 |
| � <<< Note 155.950 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>
� -< LDUC alert >-
�
�
�The Crazy Met
No flies on you.
|
155.968 | Wake when it's over Darling | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Tue Mar 01 1994 17:02 | 10 |
| ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Someone wake me when it's over. And I thought the skating itself
was a real snoozer.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Zamboni
|
155.969 | | WKRP::LEETCH | U.S. Messaging Practice, Cincinnati | Tue Mar 01 1994 17:07 | 14 |
| Somewhere in the last 100 entries or so I had this image...
I think they ought to let figure skaters protest to the judges the same way
baseball players protest to umps....
Imagine Nancy Kerrigan in the German judge's face with flecks of spit flying
out, hollering and screaming "you're #@&$#&$ nuts ump, there was no way I two
footed the &?$?@ triple axel, get yer !%&@??@ eyes checked" and finishing it up
with a Billy-Martin-style kicking of ice-dust on the judge and Lou-Piniella-
style heaving of her flowers out on the ice.
:)
Bruce
|
155.970 | In the Olympics, money > sport | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Tue Mar 01 1994 19:04 | 7 |
| George, of course the IOC will have figure skating in the 1998 Winter
Olympics. It is the highest rated even they have; thats where lots of
their TV dollars come from. Doesn't matter if it is a sport, it will be
there because it rakes in the BIG bucks.
The Crazy Met
|
155.971 | | CTHQ::LEARY | It'sBeenALongTimeComing... | Tue Mar 01 1994 21:30 | 11 |
| Why do they still call it synchronized swimming during the individual
competition?
And I think they should have ice fishing at the next Winter Olympics..
First yahoo to down a 12pak of Scmidt's and land a small-mouthed
bass wifout swallowing his chaw wins the gold... US team should be made
up of Minnesotans and one Maniac.
MikeL
|
155.972 | A Real Judged-sport | MTWAIN::BURROWS | Racers Ready...3,..2,..1,.. | Wed Mar 02 1994 09:20 | 12 |
| re: .951
Notes a sport in itself...I think you've got something there.
I give George a 5.6 in Technical for tenacity in explaining the
technicalities. I give him a 3.2 for Artistic Impression for taking
the bait and explaining them over (and over and over...).
Speaking of bait, for .971, I give Leary a 5.9 on the laugh scale.
Clark
|
155.973 | Intensive Care Unit | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Mar 02 1994 09:48 | 8 |
|
Heard on Paul Harvey coming in, Sun Valley Idaho, home of Picabo Street
is naming part of their hospital after her. Yep, that's right,
Picabo ICU
Kevin
|
155.974 | | CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH | Lindsey is four years old!!!! | Wed Mar 02 1994 10:30 | 3 |
| re: .937
Damn I wish I had come up with that...
|
155.975 | No wonder we're going down the shitter | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Wed Mar 02 1994 12:29 | 11 |
| After surfin through the last 400 replies in here, it astounds me that
during these difficult times at Digital where every last penny matters,
people can find the time to read, internalize and respond to notes for
the duration of the workday.
Don't lay on the "I note between compiles" or "I'm on break", etc. Some
of the ardent respondents to this note have replies every 4-5 minutes.
What is wrong with this picture?
Mark.
|
155.976 | | HANNAH::ASHE | One of the sweethearts at Digital | Wed Mar 02 1994 13:31 | 5 |
| Why go through 400 replies when a next unseen would suffice? That's
what I do...
A LOT more wrong with this place than what you describe...
|
155.977 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aces and Eights | Wed Mar 02 1994 14:32 | 12 |
| > Don't lay on the "I note between compiles" or "I'm on break", etc. Some
> of the ardent respondents to this note have replies every 4-5 minutes.
Yeah, well, maybe the stuff that I build takes a long time to build....
That and windows technology makes it possible.
But, in Walt's reply, he's right -- there's a lot more wrong than
folks in notes.
'Saw
|
155.978 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 02 1994 14:41 | 2 |
| Like program managers of low profit margin products flittin' off to the
west coast to attend "business meetings".
|
155.979 | another angle | FRETZ::HEISER | shut up 'n' jam! | Wed Mar 02 1994 14:52 | 2 |
| And in addition to the past few replies, it takes just as long to
analyze timestamps on 400 replies as it does to reply every 5 minutes.
|
155.980 | He's got a point; apply it if/where necessary (I will) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 02 1994 15:04 | 4 |
|
C'mon, guys, constructive criticism duly noted, no need to get
personal; let's break it up and move on...
|
155.981 | Olympic Wrapup | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 02 1994 15:50 | 82 |
| From: [email protected] (Dave Barry)
Subject:Farewell to the Winter Olympics
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 14:18:35 EST
Message-ID:<[email protected]>
LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- This is my last column from Norway.
I'm going back to the United States so I can thaw myself out and,
as a public health service, set fire to my long underwear. Also,
I'm hoping to turn on the TV and actually see some Winter Olympic
sports; this is almost impossible to do when you're in Norway,
what with all the mandatory Tonya Harding press events.
I really enjoyed what I saw of the Olympics. My only
criticism is that there are too many sports that American TV
viewers cannot relate to, such as speedskating, which goes on
forever (Today's Events: Men's 600 meters; men's 601 meters; men's
601.1 meters; men's...). They should replace these events, as well
as cross-country skiing, with winter sports that Americans enjoy
and are good at, such as basketball.
Also, I think the bobsled and luge events could be spiced
up a little. The problem now is that they're too predictable: In
the bobsled event, for example, the competitors ALWAYS ride in
bobsleds, so you, the observer, always know exactly what you're
going to see, namely, a bobsled whizzing past. It would be far
more entertaining if the competitors were judged on the creativity
of their vehicles.
ANNOUNCER: "And here come the Americans ... they'll need
a great run here to beat the Austrians, who came down in an Amana
freezer .... OK, here they come, and they're riding ... MY GOD,
THE ENTIRE TEAM IS RIDING ON A STANDARD COMMODE! DO YOU BELIEVE IN
MIRACLES?"
But these are minor quibbles. The Winter Olympics were
great, and the Norwegians were helpful and cheerful to the point
where I began to suspect that somebody was slipping industrial
quantities of Prozac into their reindeer meat. I think we should
give them all of our atomic weapons and ask them to take over the
United States and run it. This would give us two major advantages:
(1) Our country would become a LOT more civilized, and (2) We
would have a king named "Harald."
This is not to say that Norway is a perfect country. It
has its flaws. It's cold a lot, and I was SHOCKED to discover
this -- there are some Norwegians, possibly as many as six, who do
not speak flawless English. So just in case you ever go to Norway
in the winter, I have prepared, with the help of Norwegian Sissel
Karlsen, this list of
EMERGENCY NORWEGIAN PHRASES
"Jeg forstaar deg ikke. Orevoksen rain har frosset." ("I
do not understand you. My earwax has frozen.")
"Politimann, en elg har spist [hatt] [frakk]
[reisekamerten] min." ("Officer, a moose has eaten my [hat] [coat]
[traveling companion].)
Noen's taer hat fait av!" ("Look! Somebody's toes
have fallen off!")
"Hei! Det er MINE taer!" ("Hey! Those are MY toes!")
Really, you should go over there. The Norwegians really
seem to like Americans. One of my fondest memories of Norway is of
a late night at the bar in the main Olympics press center; Mitch
Albom, a fine sports columnist and musician, was playing the
piano, and we were singing old rock songs -- "Wonderful World,"
"Memphis," "Dream," songs like that. There was hardly anybody
around besides the Norwegians, mostly volunteers, who staffed the
press center, and they LOVED us. We were probably the number-one
musical act in the entire press center at that hour. At one point
we did a dramatic version of "My Girl," holding bananas for
microphones and attempting some actual synchronized dance steps,
and the crowd went WILD, at least for Norwegians.
Finally, at about 2:30 a.m., we decided to close with one
last song, "Land of 1,000 Dances." We sang a verse, then, as we
reached the chorus, we turned to the crowd.
"Come on, Norwegians!" we said. "Everybody join in!"
And they did. We sang together, Americans and Norwegians,
our voices filling the press center with words that came from our
hearts:
Na, na na na na, na na na na, na na na, na na na ...
Call me sentimental if you want, but to me, that's what
the Olympics are all about.
(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
|
155.982 | | NWD002::JOLMAMA | President Clinton and her husband. | Mon Mar 07 1994 16:20 | 7 |
| It's March and the Sonics are still the top team in the NBA.
The primary area of concern must be Rick Pierce's bad foot- looks
like he may be out for the rest of the year.
Right now, the look like a three way race to see who'll play either
the Knicks of Atlanta. The 3 being Salt Lake, San Antone & Seattle.
|
155.983 | is the NBA in the Winter Olympics now? | FRETZ::HEISER | the rock cries out! | Mon Mar 07 1994 16:58 | 1 |
|
|
155.984 | Nancy on Dateline last night | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Mar 09 1994 09:19 | 5 |
| Did anyone catch Nancy Kerrigan's interview with Jane Pauley last
night. She can cry as well as Tonya can.
The other day at the parade she said "Mickey Mouse is the finest mouse
I have ever met"
|
155.985 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 09:24 | 21 |
| >
> Did anyone catch Nancy Kerrigan's interview with Jane Pauley last
> night. She can cry as well as Tonya can.
>
> The other day at the parade she said "Mickey Mouse is the finest mouse
> I have ever met"
Man, I'm beginning to think this girl is dumber than a stump.
I heard it on Imus this morning, and I agree with what Don said:
"You wanted this girl, so suck it up, cause that's the
way it is"
If I had all that money she's gonna be getting, I'd let 'em film me
taking a dump if they wanted to......
'Saw
|
155.986 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Mar 09 1994 09:25 | 7 |
|
>> The other day at the parade she said "Mickey Mouse is the finest mouse
>> I have ever met"
I guess 'Saw was right all along. This girl is as smart as a
lampshade.
|
155.987 | | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 09 1994 09:29 | 15 |
|
I don't understand the Mickey Mouse comment. It sounds like a
tongue-in-cheek acknowledgement of the previous blunder. I don't get
it; what's the joke here?
> I heard it on Imus this morning, and I agree with what Don said:
>
> "You wanted this girl, so suck it up, cause that's the
> way it is"
Wow, that's really shocking, Don Imus, leading practitioner of insult
humor in the USA, rationalizing his own existence... ;-)
glenn
|
155.988 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 09:30 | 6 |
| > I guess 'Saw was right all along. This girl is as smart as a
> lampshade.
Hey, I like that comparison. Can I use that in the future?
|
155.989 | | ELMAGO::BENBACA | I've got Three Knees! :-) | Wed Mar 09 1994 10:31 | 3 |
| >> This Girl is as smart as a lampshade
Yabbut some of em are bright
|
155.990 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 10:41 | 4 |
| > <<< Note 155.989 by ELMAGO::BENBACA "I've got Three Knees! :-)" >>>
GREAT p-name.....
|
155.991 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 09 1994 10:46 | 11 |
| Mentally Kerrigan has proven that she has what it takes to be a good skater.
It's hard to understand why all that much else matters to so many people.
She skated the best pair of performances of her life and kept the string of
U.S. Olympic medals in her event alive, a string that goes back to '68. I'm not
sure that the U.S. has a streak like that in any other Winter Olympic event.
It seems that her relationship with The Mouse is her business and her
intelligence in other matters should be somewhat irrelevant.
George
|
155.992 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:00 | 12 |
| >It's hard to understand why all that much else matters to so many people.
Just keep trying, George. Maybe it'll hit you....
> It seems that her relationship with The Mouse is her business and her
>intelligence in other matters should be somewhat irrelevant.
We never said it was relevant......
'Saw
|
155.993 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:03 | 9 |
| �Man, I'm beginning to think this girl is dumber than a stump.
Beginning to think? You made it abundantly clear at least a couple of
weeks ago what you think.
�If I had all that money she's gonna be getting, I'd let 'em film me
�taking a dump if they wanted to......
I'm glad to see integrity and pride aren't dead.
|
155.994 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:04 | 4 |
| > I heard it on Imus this morning, and I agree with what Don said:
Isn't this the same show you heard someone claim that she knew Nancy
and Nancy (a two time Olympic medalist) wasn't a good skater?
|
155.995 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:06 | 39 |
| >
> Beginning to think? You made it abundantly clear at least a couple of
> weeks ago what you think.
>
No, I said she was an airhead, who practiced so much she didn't have time
to spend in the library.
Now, dumber than a stump is a little farther along the scale....
|�If I had all that money she's gonna be getting, I'd let 'em film me
|�taking a dump if they wanted to......
|
| I'm glad to see integrity and pride aren't dead.
I could see the commercial now:
It's show me, just settling down on the bowl.
The narration would be in my voice and would start
"There's a voice {GRUNT}, and it's in my
head {GRUNT}, and it's telling me I should
{GRUNT} eat more bran.
Kellogs All-Bran.....
or something like that....
Now all I have to do is find me an Olympic sport where I can get
a medal and then an endorsement!
'Saw
|
155.996 | Nope -- gotta read what I write... | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:08 | 18 |
| |> I heard it on Imus this morning, and I agree with what Don said:
|
| Isn't this the same show you heard someone claim that she knew Nancy
| and Nancy (a two time Olympic medalist) wasn't a good skater?
No.
I caught that person twice at two different times. She called into the
Russ Salsberg show, the a couple of days after Nancy was whacked in the
knee -- same day that the Jets coach got canned, because they interrupted
this person's call with the news about Coslett.
Then, a few weeks ago, coming home from drill I caught her again, talking
to Bill Doherty (I think that's his name) on the late show.....
'Saw
|
155.997 | Unless of course it was a_anonymous source... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:14 | 9 |
|
Whoever it was, you've got to admit that it took a certain amount of
chutzpah to go on the radio and claim that you're close enough to
the USFSA to know that a near-miss figure skating gold medalist is
really not that good. I know that raises the level of credibility for
me...
glenn
|
155.998 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:16 | 10 |
| RE <<< Note 155.992 by CAMONE::WAY "Fire at will!....(Will who?)" >>>
>>It's hard to understand why all that much else matters to so many people.
>
>Just keep trying, George. Maybe it'll hit you....
Ok, whack away. We got the medal, the streak is alive, why does all this mouse
stuff matter so much?
George
|
155.999 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:18 | 4 |
|
NOTES> modify entry sports/file=coffee_talk
|
155.1000 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:19 | 19 |
| >
> Whoever it was, you've got to admit that it took a certain amount of
> chutzpah to go on the radio and claim that you're close enough to
> the USFSA to know that a near-miss figure skating gold medalist is
> really not that good. I know that raises the level of credibility for
> me...
>
Hey, I just reported what I heard.
I don't really care if she's good or not, quite frankly, but what we're
seeing in a sense is another Mary Lou Retton deal -- except that Mary Lou
knew enough not to dis the hand that was feeding her.
And Kerrigan is as sharp as a marble.....
'Saw
|
155.1001 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:19 | 14 |
| RE <<< Note 155.997 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
> Whoever it was, you've got to admit that it took a certain amount of
> chutzpah to go on the radio and claim that you're close enough to
> the USFSA to know that a near-miss figure skating gold medalist is
> really not that good. I know that raises the level of credibility for
> me...
I agree. It sounds like what you would expect from a radio sports call in
program. The line on Kerrigan all year was that she was one of a group that was
capable of winning but that Bauil was the favorite. That Olympic event played
out just about the way the people in the field thought it would.
George
|
155.1002 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:20 | 6 |
| > Ok, whack away. We got the medal, the streak is alive, why does all this mouse
>stuff matter so much?
Probably because this is SPORTS.
'Saw
|
155.1003 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:25 | 5 |
| �I don't really care if she's good or not, quite frankly, but what we're
�seeing in a sense is another Mary Lou Retton deal
Oh, OK. You're sick of seeing her and are a bit envious. If you had
come out up front and said this we wouldn't be having this discussion.
|
155.1004 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:26 | 25 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1002 by CAMONE::WAY "Fire at will!....(Will who?)" >>>
>> Ok, whack away. We got the medal, the streak is alive, why does all this mouse
>>stuff matter so much?
>
>Probably because this is SPORTS.
It's not just sports. This is a major news story that dominated the national
news since the attack, even pushing Whitewater and the war in Bosnia off the
cover of Time and Newsweek. And only about 1/4 to 1/3 of the coverage was
on the sporting event.
Something about this story has captured the attention of the nation and I
doubt it's figure skating. People get whacked every day, people skate every
day, only a fraction of the Olympic athletes showed up at closing ceremonies
and lots of athletes sign contracts and mouth off but few get the attention
that this story is getting.
I really don't understand, what makes this such a big deal? I've been
interested in the sport since '68 but lots more than skating fans are following
this story.
Why do they care what Nancy says to the Mouse?
George
|
155.1005 | Uh, gee, who's perpetuating this? | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:35 | 18 |
|
> I don't really care if she's good or not, quite frankly, but what we're
> seeing in a sense is another Mary Lou Retton deal -- except that Mary Lou
> knew enough not to dis the hand that was feeding her.
What I think we're seeing is deadbeat gossip media types like Imus and
the like flailing a dead horse that would have been well on its way to
extinction otherwise. Like I predicted, we're not seeing Kerrigan on
every other commercial break and if it weren't for these startling
revelations that she somehow feels the need to respond to, she'd
already be onto her niche market. People *are* sick of it. Imus'
self-sustaining she's-been-paid-to-have-me-beat-her-up-over-how-sick-we-
all-are-of-seeing-her-beat-up schtick is just self-righteous baloney.
See it for what it is: as long as your man Imus can get laughs,
interest and ratings out of it, he'll ride this pony into eternity...
glenn
|
155.1006 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:43 | 4 |
|
Blatant homerism at it's ugliest. A semi-star in a semi-sport with
terminal foot-in-mouth disease and the local vocals are tripping all
over themselves defending the hag. What a laugh.
|
155.1007 | Oh, I guess *this* is legitimate comic usage... ;-) | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:50 | 12 |
|
> Blatant homerism at it's ugliest. A semi-star in a semi-sport with
> terminal foot-in-mouth disease and the local vocals are tripping all
> over themselves defending the hag. What a laugh.
Should I try the "difference between free speech and rude jokes" speech
(which I agreed with, btw) applied to your treatment of such
superficialities of how Kerrigan sounds, or even worse, what she looks
like?
glenn
|
155.1008 | | SWAM1::OHL_TA | Ouch! Ice burns to the face! | Wed Mar 09 1994 11:53 | 3 |
| I want to know what the mouse has to say about all this.
|
155.1009 | Sprot opinion #901 on Nancy etal | AKOCOA::BREEN | | Wed Mar 09 1994 12:06 | 20 |
| Nancy Kerrigan is obviously a very intelligent and witty person as
typified by the "finest Mouse" remark. To say she is not "nice" is
to say she doesn't suffer fools well and if the press happens to be
sensitive about that then it is their problem and we have seen how they
have responded (exhibit A mr Fitzgerald of the Herald).
As to the skating so much for detente or "end of communism" or
whatever. Four Eastern Block Nyets, Four NATO Ouis and a tie(breaker).
Will someone tell me what is new?
As for Disney Characters, NK is the epitome of the latest Beauties and
Princesses: a bit of a wise-ass, not necessarily likable (brings out
the beast in some of us). I also liked her "cry again" remark.
Interesting from radio call-in that so many of the anti-nk crew were women
who were plain and simply just jealous. IMUS btw has eschewed for the
most part NKvsTHvsSB... mainly because he doesn't have the time.
(and "Bruno",'Saw, is just another of his stable of characters including the
Cardinal of NY.)
|
155.1010 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Wed Mar 09 1994 12:35 | 10 |
| > Should I try the "difference between free speech and rude jokes" speech
> (which I agreed with, btw) applied to your treatment of such
> superficialities of how Kerrigan sounds, or even worse, what she looks
> like?
You're right, Glenn. We all know that superficialities have nothing to
do with how figure skating is judged or who does and doesn't reap the
endorsements. Okey dokey. I bet poor Nancy cries for days every time an
acme safe lands on Wile E. Coyote.
|
155.1011 | I think you knew what I was referring to... | NAC::G_WAUGAMAN | | Wed Mar 09 1994 12:37 | 10 |
|
> You're right, Glenn. We all know that superficialities have nothing to
> do with how figure skating is judged or who does and doesn't reap the
> endorsements.
I didn't realize that having no lips and buck teeth bought you anything
here... ;-)
glenn
|
155.1012 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 09 1994 12:37 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1008 by SWAM1::OHL_TA "Ouch! Ice burns to the face!" >>>
> I want to know what the mouse has to say about all this.
The Mouse (read "Disney") has spoken. The Mouse says that they don't expect
her to be perfect (read "We already signed the contract").
They've been playing spin doctor and together with her agent are responsible
for most of the damage control statements (i.e. "I didn't want to brag",
"Oksana is my friend", etc.).
Anyway, she won the medal and kept the streak alive. As far as I can see,
she's done her job, time to go make a living doing Ice Shows.
I still can't understand why this is such a big story.
George
|
155.1013 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 13:04 | 15 |
| >
> I still can't understand why this is such a big story.
>
Ah, Grasshopper....
When you understand why SPORTS is SPORTS and Sports isn't, then will
englightenment shine upon you all the days of your noting life....
Master 'Saw
PS I wish Hawk was still here for this......
|
155.1014 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 09 1994 13:18 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1013 by CAMONE::WAY "Fire at will!....(Will who?)" >>>
>When you understand why SPORTS is SPORTS and Sports isn't, then will
>englightenment shine upon you all the days of your noting life....
I guess you were in the head when I wrote earlier that I'm talking about
the way the story has been picked up by the national press, not the SPORTS
notes file.
Let me try again to try to pick up the spot hit and run readers,
I still can't understand why this is such a big story WITH THE NATIONAL
PRESS, NOT THE FRIGG'EN SPORTS NOTES FILE!!!
George
|
155.1015 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 13:29 | 34 |
| >
> I guess you were in the head when I wrote earlier that I'm talking about
>the way the story has been picked up by the national press, not the SPORTS
>notes file.
>
Yeah, I was filmin' my bran commercial 8^)
> Let me try again to try to pick up the spot hit and run readers,
>
> I still can't understand why this is such a big story WITH THE NATIONAL
>PRESS, NOT THE FRIGG'EN SPORTS NOTES FILE!!!
Best guess? It sells copy.
You or I, probably for different reasons, couldn't give two little turds
about this story, but I guess for most of the rest of the country, who've
never been weaned from Ellison's "Glass Teat", they get a vicarious turn
on from this stuff. From the beginning with The Attack, through the
current interest, I think that's it.
Now, the other thing too, coupled in with that is that most folks who
believed in the Ice Princess were severely dissappointed when they
saw behind the curtain (Pay No Attention to that Skater Behind the Curtain)
and saw someone who was human.....
I think that's got a lot to do with it....
'Saw
|
155.1016 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 09 1994 13:54 | 5 |
| �You or I, probably for different reasons, couldn't give two little turds
�about this story,
If you don't care about this story, why all the comments from you about
the talk show call-ins and Nancy's IQ?
|
155.1017 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Breastfed on falsies | Wed Mar 09 1994 14:00 | 5 |
| Are any more of our nation's prominent figure skaters scheduled to
cry on a major network in the immediate future? I need to know
so I can set the VCR. Thanks in advance.
/Don
|
155.1018 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Wed Mar 09 1994 14:04 | 11 |
| >
> If you don't care about this story, why all the comments from you about
> the talk show call-ins and Nancy's IQ?
>
Maybe I have an ulterior motive, or a hidden agenda?
But, I do find it horribly amusing, in a self-abusive kind of way,
that Nancy is dumber 'n a stump.....8^)
|
155.1019 | yeah it's called the Monterey Whine Festival | FRETZ::HEISER | most corrupt White House ever | Wed Mar 09 1994 14:05 | 1 |
|
|
155.1020 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Mar 10 1994 09:15 | 7 |
|
Figure skater Nancy Kerrigan announced that she would be
donating the money from her SNL appearance to a fund she
created to aid children with learning disabilities in her
Stoneham, Massachusetts neighborhood. It was later explained
to a red-faced Kerrigan that those 'Slow Children' street
signs meant something completely different.
|
155.1021 | | CTHQ::LEARY | It'sBeenALongTimeComing... | Thu Mar 10 1994 09:28 | 5 |
| Tommy Brydie gets the third Mike Heiser Insensitivity Award.
Film at 11.
MikeL
|
155.1022 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Thu Mar 10 1994 09:39 | 14 |
| > Tommy Brydie gets the third Mike Heiser Insensitivity Award.
> Film at 11.
>
> MikeL
Well, I for one have waited a long time to pass coffee through my nose
reading sports. I haven't done that since MrT left.
So, Tommy did it to me, and he wins my Coffee_In_The_Sinuses Award....
'Saw
|
155.1023 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Mar 10 1994 10:27 | 10 |
|
In other Kerrigan news. Nancy Kerrigan was spotted yesterday in
Boston's Faneuil Hall marketplace. Several tourists and locals
were pleasantly suprised to see Kerrigan holding a prolonged con-
versation with a lifesized bronze statue of Red Auerbach which is
posed sitting on one of the benches with his trademark cigar. "He
seems nice but he's not very talkative. We talked for 20 minutes
and he didn't say a word. I guess he's a Tonya fan" said an ob-
viously disappointed Kerrigan.
|
155.1024 | | CTHQ::LEARY | It'sBeenALongTimeComing... | Thu Mar 10 1994 10:36 | 4 |
| You forgot the part when she said the experience was very exciting.
MikeL
|
155.1025 | all these awards and I didn't even get one yet | FRETZ::HEISER | impeach the President and her husband | Thu Mar 10 1994 11:19 | 1 |
| Tommy, you're killin' me.
|
155.1026 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Thu Mar 10 1994 11:50 | 8 |
|
In still other Kerrigan news. Mattel has announced that
a new Nancy doll is in the works. The new doll, which is
expected to be in stores by June, cries "Why me?", says
"Give me some money" and also "That Barbie is a slut". A
Mattel spokesman says that they expect the doll to be a big
seller.
|
155.1027 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Thu Mar 10 1994 11:56 | 19 |
| > In still other Kerrigan news. Mattel has announced that
> a new Nancy doll is in the works. The new doll, which is
> expected to be in stores by June, cries "Why me?", says
> "Give me some money" and also "That Barbie is a slut". A
> Mattel spokesman says that they expect the doll to be a big
> seller.
Will it wet if you feed it Campell's Soup?
Will it comes with its own little pair of Reeboks?
Enquiring and all that....
'Saw
|
155.1028 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | It rains toads... | Thu Mar 10 1994 15:40 | 7 |
|
>>Will it comes with its own little pair of Reeboks?
No, but it WILL breath heavy for a while.
JaKe
|
155.1029 | | SWAM1::OHL_TA | Ouch! Ice burns to the face! | Thu Mar 10 1994 17:03 | 4 |
| I wonder who will be making the Tanya doll. It can have the "G.I Joe"
action arm. Just lock it back and push the release button. WHAM!!
|
155.1030 | Nancy on SNL | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Fri Mar 11 1994 09:58 | 6 |
| So what will Nancy do on SNL tomorrow night? I heard on the news that
cast members have said that she is real sweet and shy and that she is
not comfortable doing the skits. She will play Snow White in one of
them.
|
155.1031 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Fri Mar 11 1994 10:05 | 13 |
| >
> So what will Nancy do on SNL tomorrow night? I heard on the news that
> cast members have said that she is real sweet and shy and that she is
> not comfortable doing the skits. She will play Snow White in one of
> them.
>
Well, from the spot I saw last night we already know she can't sing....
I might watch it though, just to see Aretha.....
|
155.1032 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Fri Mar 11 1994 10:13 | 3 |
| the opening monologue will be painful
The Crazy Met
|
155.1033 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Mar 11 1994 11:22 | 10 |
| SNL has a formula for working with hosts that have no talent. They minimize
the number of skits they have to do, they arrange the skits to minimize their
lines, and they bring someone else out immediately to help with the opening
monologue.
About all she'll have to do on her own is say: "Ladies and Gentlemen, Arithia
Franklen" a couple times and she'll do fine. How can you lose when you get to
introduce one of the greatest singers that ever lived?
George
|
155.1034 | So what's the big deal? | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Fri Mar 11 1994 12:37 | 2 |
|
|
155.1035 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Mar 11 1994 12:43 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1034 by CAPNET::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Product Management" >>>
-< So what's the big deal? >-
Beats me, did someone say there was a big deal?
If so, what got dealt?
George
|
155.1036 | | FRETZ::HEISER | impeach the President and her husband | Fri Mar 11 1994 12:51 | 6 |
| > About all she'll have to do on her own is say: "Ladies and Gentlemen, Arithia
>Franklen" a couple times and she'll do fine. How can you lose when you get to
>introduce one of the greatest singers that ever lived?
George, admittedly she's one of the greatest, but at least pay her some
R-E-S-P-E-C-T and spell her name right. It's Urethra.
|
155.1037 | | CAMONE::WAY | Fire at will!....(Will who?) | Fri Mar 11 1994 12:54 | 5 |
| > R-E-S-P-E-C-T and spell her name right. It's Urethra.
Not to be confused with her twin sisters Vulva and Uvula....
|
155.1038 | or the Labia twins | FRETZ::HEISER | impeach the President and her husband | Fri Mar 11 1994 12:58 | 1 |
|
|
155.1039 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | It rains toads... | Fri Mar 11 1994 15:35 | 8 |
| Or the Lee sisters,
Ug and Home
JaKe
|
155.1040 | | MKFSA::LONG | That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! | Fri Mar 11 1994 15:49 | 6 |
| Did you mention the Witt trips...
Half, Dim and Nit
|
155.1041 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | It rains toads... | Fri Mar 11 1994 17:12 | 7 |
| And then there's the Off Bros.
You cain figger it out..
JaKe
|
155.1042 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Mar 14 1994 16:17 | 8 |
| It appears that the World Championship Figure Skating will be on in prime
time after all. According to the Globe, CBS is handing the Tonya problem off to
NBC which is planning 4 hours of prime time coverage of the World Figure
Skating Championship which takes place next week in Japan.
It will not necessarily be same day or next day coverage.
George
|
155.1043 | | QUASER::JACKSONTA | Long lost recipe | Mon Mar 14 1994 22:25 | 4 |
| Did I miss the note of Kerrigan on SNL? I didn't see it, just
curious of opinions/reactions of her "performance"...
Tim
|
155.1044 | | CSOA1::ROPER | | Mon Mar 14 1994 22:31 | 4 |
| Tim, she struggled when she had to string more than 2 words together!
She obviously was out of her element.
- Rope
|
155.1045 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 15 1994 09:44 | 11 |
| They did their usual weak host formula of planning the skits so that she was
always surrounded by regulars and never had much to say. She fumbled somewhat
with the lines that she had but the skits were pretty good so it ended up being
one of the better programs. She almost always appeared with Phil Hartman who
is outstanding at handling nervous hosts.
The part where she skated pairs with Chris Farley was a riot.
Aretha Franklen was great. Her best song was the last one, Chain of Fools.
George
|
155.1046 | The WBC do what they do | CTHQ::LEARY | It'sBeenALongTimeComing... | Tue Mar 15 1994 09:44 | 8 |
| Jeez I don't think she was that bad Rope. Hail she's had limited
access to public appearances where she's had to perform (speak)
at length but she showed me she had the bottle. She musta been
nervous but handled it OK. However Mssr Brydie will liken her
performance to that of well-known thespian Leon Spinks.
MikeL
|
155.1047 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 15 1994 09:49 | 9 |
| The latest word on Tonya Harding is that she's been offered $2 million by a
Japanese businessman to become a wrestler. He says she has the perfect build
for the sport and feels she would do well. He'd like her to wrestle when she is
in Japan for the World Figure Skating championships next week.
It wasn't clear if professional wrestling in Japan is a real sport like
college wrestling or just a side show as wrestling is in the United States.
George
|
155.1048 | Passable | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Tue Mar 15 1994 09:51 | 4 |
| What I saw wasn't bad. As noted previously,SNL did a good job of
covering her weaknesses and giving her no chance to mess up.
I liked the trio they had playing Harding,Giloolly and Sean Eckert.
|
155.1049 | ex | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 15 1994 10:51 | 6 |
|
>> It wasn't clear if professional wrestling in Japan is a real
>> sport like college wrestling or just a side show as wrestling
>> is in the United States.
I hope you're kidding.
|
155.1050 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 15 1994 11:14 | 24 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1049 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> >> It wasn't clear if professional wrestling in Japan is a real
> >> sport like college wrestling or just a side show as wrestling
> >> is in the United States.
>
> I hope you're kidding.
Ok now let me guess. Are you griping about the fact that I called college
wrestling a real sport, professional wrestling a side show, or the fact that
I don't know how to categorize Japanese wrestling?
Could be the 1st, college wrestling is not a real sport. After all since it's
not college basketball it's not pure with the pearls in the safe and what not.
Then again, maybe you're a big Hulk Hogan fan and don't like me dissing your
favorite past time.
Or could be that the Japanese Sumo diving ad has you convinced that Japanese
wrestling is not a sport.
I give up, which one is it?
George
|
155.1051 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 11:25 | 6 |
| It's very easy to figure out, George. If a professional "sport" is
willing to offer big bucks to someone who has never performed that
"sport" in their lives, surely the question of is it sport or is it
entertainment masquerading as sport is answered.
Kind of like when Gastineau and Chamberlain were enticed to boxing...
|
155.1052 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 15 1994 11:31 | 11 |
|
>> Ok now let me guess. Are you griping about the fact that I called
>> college wrestling a real sport, professional wrestling a side show,
>> or the fact that I don't know how to categorize Japanese wrestling?
I ain't "griping", George. Just a little surprised that you'd actually
think that someone would pay Tonya 2 million samolians to wrestle under
strict amateur rules. How many people besides yourself would pay money
for that? Zero, that's how many. Obviously, they must have the equiv-
alent of a ladies WWF over there. Jeesh.
|
155.1053 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 15 1994 11:31 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1051 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
> It's very easy to figure out, George. If a professional "sport" is
> willing to offer big bucks to someone who has never performed that
> "sport" in their lives, surely the question of is it sport or is it
> entertainment masquerading as sport is answered.
>
> Kind of like when Gastineau and Chamberlain were enticed to boxing...
... Or like Michael Jordan being offered money to play baseball for the White
Sox (i.e. Baseball is not a sport).
Ok, I understand. It's not college basketball so it's not a sport.
George
|
155.1054 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Tue Mar 15 1994 11:45 | 2 |
| Boy, I hope OSHA doesn't get a hold of this. There are so many
non-sequiturs flying around here, they could put someone's eye out!
|
155.1055 | | WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_M | Give me LIBERTY or give me.... | Tue Mar 15 1994 11:55 | 3 |
|
Is Curling a sport?
|
155.1056 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:02 | 3 |
| � Ok, I understand. It's not college basketball so it's not a sport.
As usual, you don't understand.
|
155.1057 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Breaking The Law | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:08 | 4 |
| Hey, are youze guys insinuating that pro 'rasslin ain't on the
up and up?
/Don
|
155.1058 | | FRETZ::HEISER | impeach the President and her husband | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:10 | 3 |
| > Is Curling a sport?
If it would put the Zamboni out of business, it isn't a sport.
|
155.1059 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:11 | 14 |
| I have to agree with George in this one.
Saying that Japanese wrestling can't be a sport because
someone is willing to pay $$$ Tonya Harding to wrestle is EXACTLY
the same as saying baseball isn't a sport because Michael Jordan,
who hasn't played since high school, is being given a chance to
play in spring training (and apparently will be playing at the
higher minor league level). Or, similarly, because Milwaukee
drafted Charlie Ward last year.
Also, since the Dallas Cowboys alledgedly approached Ben Johnson about
becoming a wide receiver after his drug-enhanced Olympics, perhaps
we ought to rethink whether football ought to be considered a real
sport.
|
155.1060 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:25 | 13 |
| I don't think that you can rule something out as a sport just because someone
runs a money making gimmick. If you did, then replacing the NFL Championship
game with the Hyper Bowl ... excuse me ... Super Bowl would rule out NFL
football as a sport. Then there are all the things they do at baseball games
like hat day, glove day, bankers day, underwear day and what ever else they
run.
With dwindling TV money, there's a lot of pressure on various sports these
days to do what ever is necessary to raise money. I think we'll see a lot
more hype in all sorts of sports before we see less so yes it's a reasonable
question to ask whether Japanese wrestling is a sport or a side show.
George
|
155.1061 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:28 | 14 |
| You're kidding, right Rick?
The Jordan case is close, but he has at least played baseball before
and has a chance of at least making a minor league team based on his
athletic ability (minor league salaries are significantly less than
what Harding is reportedly being offered). Charlie Ward is in the
starting lineup of his college basketball team -- is it really that far
a reach to think he might play basketball? The Cowboys offered Ben
Johnson a tryout. Did they cut him a check for $1 mil and order a
uniform for him? I think not. There is also precedent for track stars
having tools applicable to some of the specialty positions in football.
Are you going to tell me that Harding's figure skating career has
prepared her for a stint at professional wrestling?
|
155.1062 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:44 | 9 |
|
I thought it was intuitively obvious that Harding was being offered
a contract for professional WWF-style ladies wrasslin'. They showed
a clip of it this AM on ESPN and I guess they expect Tonya to be the
'90s equivalent of the Fabulous Moola over in Japan. It's beyond me
that anyone could really expect Tonya to strap on head gear and get
on a real wrestling mat and wrestle legit. As if someone would pay to
see that. Jeesh.
|
155.1063 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 15 1994 12:44 | 16 |
| Jordan hasn't played baseball since highschool and he will probably be making
over $50,000. How many people can you name outside of entertainment and politics
who make that much money on something for which they have showed no talent.
Also, how many other guys with his level of talent in highschool baseball who
haven't played for 10 years get the chance he got with that much attention by a
major league coaching staff. Wasn't Heinrick himself watching over his batting
practice.
I believe that Jordan was signed to create excitement and to keep him happy
in case he decides to go back to basketball. It's all hype pure and simple but
that doesn't mean baseball is not a sport, that's just the reality of running
sports as a business in this day and age. They do what they feel they have to
do.
George
|
155.1067 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:06 | 16 |
| � Jordan hasn't played baseball since highschool and he will probably be making
�over $50,000. How many people can you name outside of entertainment and politics
�who make that much money on something for which they have showed no talent.
But we're not talking about someone with no talent and $50K is a drop
in the bucket in terms of professional baseball.
�Wasn't Heinrick himself watching over his batting
�practice.
I don't know who this Heinrick guy is, but I wouldn't be surprised if
Walt Hrniak was watching over his batting practice, afterall, he is the
White Sox batting coach and he is paid to watch over everyone who takes
BP.
|
155.1068 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:06 | 11 |
|
> Ok so then based on that are you saying that baseball is obviously
> not a sport because they signed Jordan? If not, then what possible
> reason could they have for signing him that is baseball related?
George, you're lost again or you're changing subjects. I'm saying it
is/was obvious to every, apparently except you, that Tonya is/was being
offered a contract to WWF-style wrestle. I didn't say anything about
Jordan, baseball or Jordan playing baseball. That Jordan thing is covered
in note 7.
|
155.1069 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:07 | 5 |
| � Well if you saw a clip that I didn't see that shows it to be a pro-wrestling
�side show then of course it's going to be obvious to you. It would be obvious
�to anyone with that information.
It was obvious to me and I didn't even see the clip.
|
155.1070 | No sport | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:22 | 7 |
| > > Is Curling a sport?
>
> If it would put the Zamboni out of business, it isn't a sport.
then it ain't a sport sez me!
flying zamboni
|
155.1071 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:27 | 12 |
| > <<< Note 155.1067 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
>
>� Jordan hasn't played baseball since highschool and he will probably be making
>�over $50,000. How many people can you name outside of entertainment and politics
>�who make that much money on something for which they have showed no talent.
>
> But we're not talking about someone with no talent and $50K is a drop
> in the bucket in terms of professional baseball.
Yes, we are talking about someone with NO talent. ZERO, NONE.
Well over half the guys on my high school baseball team would have
done better than Jordan, given the same opportunity.
|
155.1073 | | TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGH | Whitewater<<<Contra (Bush knew) | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:36 | 14 |
| Uhhh, just for some clarification:
My wife's cousin wrestled in HS in Conneticut, where the assistant coach on
the team was Bob Backlund (former WWF champ). I went to a meet one day, and
spoke to Backlund. I asked him if he still wrestled, and he told me he goes
to Japan once a year, where they "really wrestle, none of the WWF garbage". (Of
course he since went back to the WWF garbage for the WWF dollars.)
This, however, is the firsted I've heard of the Tonya Harding as a wrestler
thang.
hth
=Bob=
|
155.1074 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:38 | 15 |
| >over $50,000. How many people can you name outside of entertainment and politics
>who make that much money on something for which they have showed no talent.
Uh, the Digital management teams?
> Also, how many other guys with his level of talent in highschool baseball who
>haven't played for 10 years get the chance he got with that much attention by a
>major league coaching staff. Wasn't Heinrick himself watching over his batting
>practice.
The Natural....
|
155.1075 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:40 | 26 |
| � I'm not changing subjects. The question is, if a top athlete of a major
�sport is offered tons of money to play in another sport for which they have
�no proven talent does that mean that the new sport is a side show and that
�there is no competition involved?
Maybe that is the question in the mind of George Maiewksi, but the
question here in CAM3::SPORTS was, if Tonya Harding is offered a ton of
money to wrestle in Japan could it possibly be for a legitimate
wrestling event?
� There is no baseball related reason why Jordan is playing for the Red Sox
Wow, Michael Jordan has been traded to Boston!!!
�Mac's thin attempt to attack my spelling does not advance your argument (talk
�about changing the subject).
It wasn't an attack at your spelling. It was an attack at your
credibility. Continue reading what I wrote -- it was along the lines
of: of course the White Sox hitting coach is watching over Jordan,
that is what he is paid to do.
�just that there is hype involved in all sports.
Once again, George is arguing with himself. I don't think anyone in
here has stated that hype is not involved in all sports.
|
155.1076 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Tue Mar 15 1994 13:41 | 3 |
| George might not be lost or changing subjects, but he is guilty of wide
ranging generalizations based upon a single case.
|
155.1079 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 14:20 | 20 |
| > Maybe that is the question in the mind of George Maiewksi, but the
> question here in CAM3::SPORTS was, if Tonya Harding is offered a ton of
> money to wrestle in Japan could it possibly be for a legitimate
> wrestling event?
Nope, wrong again Mac. I started this thread and my original statement was:
>HELIX::MAIEWSKI Note 155.1047
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> It wasn't clear if professional wrestling in Japan is a real sport like
>college wrestling or just a side show as wrestling is in the United States.
IMO, my paraphrase of the question is alot closer to what you said in
.1047 than what you claimed the question was in .1074 (or thereabouts):
� I'm not changing subjects. The question is, if a top athlete of a major
�sport is offered tons of money to play in another sport for which they have
�no proven talent does that mean that the new sport is a side show and that
�there is no competition involved?
|
155.1080 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 14:23 | 7 |
| � And the reason you say you know that is because of the money involved. I
�say that it is possible that they really are competing and that the money alone
�does not mean that it is scripted and hence not a sport.
No, George. Noone said money was THE reason. The amount of money, the
personality involved, and the reputation that professional wrestling
has earned led us to that conclusion.
|
155.1081 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 14:27 | 16 |
| � Ok, so do you agree with me when I say that you can not tell whether pro
�wrestling in japan is or is not a sport based on the one offer given to Harding
�or do you agree with Mac and Brydie that the offer alone means that pro
�wrestling in Japan is not a sport?
�
� My comment about Jordan was only to demonstrate that one incident does not
�make it obvious as to whether or not something is a sport or a scripted side
�show.
Michael Jordan has played organized baseball. There has been no
mention of Tonya Harding ever having wrestled (in the U.S. high schools
& colleges, wrestling is traditionally a male sport). Basketball
players have played professional baseball. I haven't heard of a female
figure skater crossing over into wrestling. The athleticism of
basketball does have counterparts in baseball. The athleticism of
figure skating could translate to WWF.
|
155.1082 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Tue Mar 15 1994 14:33 | 15 |
| > Rewinding to a checkpoint and going forward again ...
>
> Ok, so do you agree with me when I say that you can not tell whether pro
>wrestling in japan is or is not a sport based on the one offer given to Harding
>or do you agree with Mac and Brydie that the offer alone means that pro
>wrestling in Japan is not a sport?
Uh, does it really matter?
> They are the ones making the generalization from the small amount of evidence,
>not me.
Keep that stuff up George, and we're gonna start calling you the
Teflon Noter.....
|
155.1084 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Tue Mar 15 1994 14:47 | 6 |
| > The personality involved, Tonya Harding, has consistently been one of the top
>10 athletes in her sport for most of the past 5 years. She's won two U.S.
>Championships including the one in '91 where she beat the next year's Olympic
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So is this like repetitive behavior here for her, or what?
|
155.1086 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 15 1994 15:06 | 11 |
|
> No, George. Noone said money was THE reason. The amount of money, the
> personality involved, and the reputation that professional wrestling
> has earned led us to that conclusion.
Of course, the video of masked and unmasked women in skimpy superhero
garb could be interpreted either way.
We're not talking about sumo wrestling here, George. That Tonya Harding
weighs about 130 pounds and there are women much much larger than that
would have been a clue for most folks.
|
155.1088 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Tue Mar 15 1994 15:12 | 23 |
| > If you don't give a rip, just hit "next unseen".
>
> I think it's down there
> \
> \
> \
> \|
> -
>
> George
Hey, NitMeister, I don't need you to tell me where next unseen is.
Anyone who's on the ball and heard the report doesn't have to be
a rocket scientist to figure that they're not gonna pay Tonya $2mill to
participate in a legit wrestling organization.
Further, whether he's right or not, Tommy's arguments are much more
consistant, and much better constructed....
'Saw
|
155.1090 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 15:24 | 14 |
| � The personality involved, Tonya Harding, has consistently been one of the top
�10 athletes in her sport for most of the past 5 years. She's won two U.S.
�Championships including the one in '91 where she beat the next year's Olympic
�gold medalist and she won a silver metal at the World championship in '91.
And exactly what can this do for her in wrestling? Perhaps it will
help her jump over her opponent, up onto the ropes, pirouette, and come
crashing down with a triple axel?
� So how does being one of the top athletes in a sport and the reputation of
�Sumo wrestling make it seem more like a scripted side show?
I know people have spoken harshly of Tonya's size and weight, but
somehow I still don't think she's in the Sumo class.
|
155.1091 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 15 1994 15:39 | 13 |
|
>> Also, even a video showing skimpy superhero garb does not necessarily
>> mean that the outcome of the events is scripted and rehearsed as it is
>> with U.S. pro wrestling so they still could be actually competing which
>> would make it a sport.
There are lots of legitimate sports where the women where skimpy super-
hero-type outfits, call themseleves things like the Dragon Queen and
spit at the crowd.
Loosen your tie and take a deep breath, George. I don't think you're
getting enough oxygen to your brain.
|
155.1093 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 15 1994 15:49 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1091 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> There are lots of legitimate sports where the women where skimpy super-
> hero-type outfits, call themseleves things like the Dragon Queen and
> spit at the crowd.
Pro Wrestling in the United States is not a sport. There is no competition.
The performers decide ahead of time not only who will win but what they will
do, what they will say, and how they will say it. They then hold rehearsals, not
practice and they go put on a performance, not a competition.
It is not at all clear whether or not Japanese wrestling is in that category
or not. Regardless of what they wear and how they behave, they may or may not
compete, we don't know. If they do, then regardless of how much hype, and
regardless of how distasteful you may find it to be, it is a sport, not a
performance.
George
|
155.1095 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 15:53 | 5 |
| �The performers decide ahead of time not only who will win but what they will
�do, what they will say, and how they will say it. They then hold rehearsals, not
�practice and they go put on a performance, not a competition.
Sounds alot like ice dancing and figure skating, eh?
|
155.1096 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 15:55 | 2 |
| OK, enlighten me George. Just exactly what was your point in bringing
up Tonya's skating career and sumo wrestling?
|
155.1097 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 15 1994 16:04 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1095 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
>�The performers decide ahead of time not only who will win but what they will
>�do, what they will say, and how they will say it. They then hold rehearsals, not
>�practice and they go put on a performance, not a competition.
>
> Sounds alot like ice dancing and figure skating, eh?
No, it sounds nothing like ice dancing or figure skating since those sports
are judged not on what you planed to do but on how well you do it. In wrestling
if you are suppose to pin your opponent and fail to do it, he just waits while
you give it a 2nd shot. The result is scripted, it's a preformance much like
the sword fight in Hamlet, not a competition.
Duck hunting is another example of something that it not a sport. Pitting
a man with a shot gun against an unarmed duck is hardly sport. There's no
chance of the duck winning and dragging the hunter into the swamp for supper.
Bear hunting with a bow and arrow sound more like sport, there's a more or
less even chance that the hunter eats the bear or that the bear eats the
hunter.
George
|
155.1098 | LDUC at it's finest | MKFSA::LONG | That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! | Tue Mar 15 1994 16:05 | 8 |
| Ah, the sight of continuous "Did not!" "Did too!" notes....
SPROTS the way it was meant to be. Fun times in the ol' Tavern
again.
billl
|
155.1100 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 15 1994 16:14 | 14 |
| � I talked about Hardings skating as evidence that the "personality involved"
�was a serious athlete and that just having her involved was not evidence
�that this was not a sport.
�
� I talked about Sumo Wrestling to show that the reputation of wrestling in
�Japan is not the same as it is in the United States and that mentioning
�Japanese professional wrestling does not automatically imply that it is
�not a sport.
And putting this into the context of the question "Is professional
women's wrestling in Japan a legitimate sport" (which I admit I did,
and since you accused me of taking you out of context, I guess that's
not what you were trying to do), I had to ask how a figure skater
translates into a legitimate professional wrestler.
|
155.1101 | Sports Entertainment | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Mar 15 1994 17:12 | 14 |
| Every now and then I listen to a 24 hour sports radio program. They
talked about the offer to Harding for wrestling in Japan. The
offer was 2 million and the japanese businessman was quoted as
saying that "Tonya would be the bad girl of wrestling for a
couple of years but that she could develop into being a heroine".
The fact that somebody would have to be a "goodguy" or "badguy"
indicates to me that it is sports entertainment NOT a Sport.
Frank Mendez
P.S. I have been known to watch the wwf periodically and it is called
sports entertainment.
|
155.1102 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Tue Mar 15 1994 17:15 | 9 |
| Football has the bad guys - Dallas Cowboys - and the good guys - everyone
else - but is still considered a sport.
Basketball has the bad guys - Boston Celtics - and the good guys - everyone
else - but is still considered a sport.
HtH :-)
The Crazy Met
|
155.1103 | Now that's a real sport! | AIMHI::KERR | No Wonder it Doesn't Work, It's Broke | Wed Mar 16 1994 08:41 | 6 |
|
Hey, can we get this discussion back to the really important stuff. Just
how skimpy are those costumes, anyway?
Al :-)
|
155.1104 | izzit a sport? Entertainment? Competition???? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Mar 16 1994 09:51 | 46 |
|
Yabbut thisted entire LDUC really really has me confused now and
Ah need some clarification.
Background:
At home I have what I think is a athlete but it runs on a weird cycle.
See at Tzero, it turns on and begins to absorb whatever is around. Then, while
the absorbtion is still in process, usually there's also a_expulsion, anywhere
from T15 to T60. Then, usually around T120 everything shuts down and enters
a "refresh" mode.
I understand that during the daytime, the "refresh" mode frequently
lasts around 2.5 - 3 hours but I have personally observed that the refresh
mode changes after sundown to (if'n yer lucky) maybe 90 minutes. Fortunately
the athlete realizes the importance of a well developed respiratory system
so at the end of the refresh cycle, practice begins and one of the most
favorite exercises is the technique of opening up the airway to it's maximum
diameter, inhaling the maximum volume of air and expelling it as quickly as
possible while simultanously making audible sounds to confirm that the
exercise is being properly performed.
Please Clarify:
Almost at random times during the Tzero-T120 cycle, one of the coaches
enters a violent competitive situation with the athlete. First, the skimpy
costume is partially removed and a "tug-of-war/leg-rassling" fight starts.
Sorta like legs and thighs vs. a hand. Of course, there's the regular
"rubdown" that boxers get and the application of ointment. Unfortunately,
neither of the participants are getting financially rewarded.
Is the above to be considered entertainment, a sport, or true
competition????????
Feel free to make further inquiries if you need more information. I'd hate
for people to jump to conclusions or make false assumptions. ;^)
I remain,
one of the coaches
Kev
|
155.1105 | | BSS::NEUZIL | Just call me Fred | Wed Mar 16 1994 10:05 | 7 |
|
Kev,
What the hail are you talking about?
Kevin
|
155.1106 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 16 1994 10:24 | 5 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1104 by CSTEAM::FARLEY >>>
Do you have a brother Chris living at home?
George
|
155.1107 | | TNPUBS::ALVEY | Bono, you ARE mainstream... | Wed Mar 16 1994 10:59 | 3 |
| On this date in 1991, the U.S. became the first nation
ever to sweep the World Figgerskating Champs as
K.Yamaguchi, T.Harding, and N.Kerrigan finished 1-2-3.
|
155.1108 | Some judges prefer one loud boom, others prefer a songh | CNTROL::CHILDS | G. Maiewski - Rookie of the Year | Wed Mar 16 1994 11:10 | 8 |
|
Kev, given the enjoyment of the expulsion part of the exercise I would
say this is entertainment (although usually confined to one's onself).
Of course I suspose at work in ajoining stalls we could turn it into a
sport but the judging would probably be purely subjective just like
figure skating..........
mike
|
155.1109 | Bud Lite could combine Diaper Changing and a exercise program? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Mar 16 1994 11:25 | 21 |
|
Yabbut Mike,
There are elements of all three and that's why I need help.
1) True, the outcome is predetermined (since the coach outweights
the athlete_in_development and will not surrender.
Therefore it could be classified entertainment (like WWF and
figgerskating).
2) but.....to the a_i_t, who doesn't either know about the
predestination, it's pure competition!
3) and, since there is physical combat to determine who will be
victorious - eventually - it could be a sport!
I remain,
you should see the pile of discarded "skimpy costumes" she has tossed!
Kev
|
155.1110 | hth? | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Mar 16 1994 11:29 | 19 |
|
re: "what the hail are you talking about?"
Kevin,
Think about it....... If ya need a hint, I'll give ya one.
I think about 18-24 months ago, you were having 3 times the coaching/
wrestling/enjoyment.....
;^)
I ain't complaining about this winter sports activity though because,
as RCASO would say, " I AM TO BLAM!!!!!!!!"
I remain,
and BLAM I did, too!
Kev
|
155.1111 | Turds, man, it's about turds.......... | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Wed Mar 16 1994 11:39 | 28 |
| > 1) True, the outcome is predetermined (since the coach outweights
> the athlete_in_development and will not surrender.
> Therefore it could be classified entertainment (like WWF and
> figgerskating).
Well, not all utterly hopeless situations are entertainment, unless you're
looking at a broad, Germanic sense of angst, self-sacrifice for the
greater glory of all, and the utmost in valor.
The outcome of the Charge of the Light Brigade was probalby pre-determined
to, but there's not a military buff around who doesn't see it in a
different way.
In that context, the athlete_in_develpment could probably fulfill all
of the requirements of a CMH candidate: intrepidity and gallantry
at risk of life above and beyond the call of duty, and the call of
duty is what it's all about.
Then again, I'm sure in a sense, it's a microcosm of life -- the oppressed
and overpowered athlete_in_development making one small, perhaps stinky,
statement of protestation in the face of superior strength......
Valhalla I am coming,
'Saw
|
155.1112 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 16 1994 12:02 | 2 |
| Kev, et.al, it you insist on keeping this discussion alive, please take
it to 27 where it belongs (or maybe try the PARENTING conference).
|
155.1113 | he probably got a complex & needs to "lord" over the litle guy | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Mar 16 1994 12:48 | 20 |
|
Yabbut Mtm,
I tried man, I really, really tried to post it in 27 but just as I
was ready to <control z> it...ah...a big guy, no actually 4 of them
actually, carrying big clubs, attacked me and threatend to do a Homer
Simpson (eat these shorts, maan) if I didn't put it in 155!!!! I tried
to fight them off but was afraid they'd mash my mug into a pile of
Digger_the_Goat_Dawg's freshest land mines....did I mention that they
had clubs before????? I meant guns...really BIG guns too.....all 11
of them had guns so I had no choice!
;^)
I remain,
wondering howcome *I* get picked on, look at the last 50 and decide
:^(
Kev
|
155.1114 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Wed Mar 16 1994 12:53 | 11 |
| I've seen the Japanese wrestling programs on TV when traveling to Hong
Kong and Taiwan on the Star Network. Hear me now and believe me later,
it is *very* much like the WWF, only worse.
George, why did you delete all those notes? Reminds me of the
disappearing acts you used to pull on Soapbox.
Finally, duck huntin *is* a sport, but pls take that argument to the
hunting note.
Mark.
|
155.1115 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Mar 16 1994 13:01 | 8 |
|
Yabbut now we're on a roll.....
Are there compulsories in Japanese wrestling?
??????
|
155.1116 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 16 1994 13:37 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1114 by CAPNET::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Product Management" >>>
> George, why did you delete all those notes? Reminds me of the
> disappearing acts you used to pull on Soapbox.
So I clean up after myself. Last week you were complaining that I was
eating up too much disk space and this week you are complaining because
I give it back. Make up your mind.
> Finally, duck huntin *is* a sport, but pls take that argument to the
> hunting note.
If it belongs in a different note then why are you arguing it here?
Ok, off to the hunting note,
George
|
155.1117 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Wed Mar 16 1994 17:17 | 7 |
| > So I clean up after myself. Last week you were complaining that I was
>eating up too much disk space and this week you are complaining because
>I give it back. Make up your mind.
>
Sounds like a MrT disappearing act, actually......
|
155.1118 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | ComingSoon-TheTonyaHardingStory | Thu Mar 17 1994 08:38 | 3 |
| Yeah but 'Saw, we *missed* MrT's notes.
/Don
|
155.1119 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Thu Mar 17 1994 09:10 | 8 |
| > Yeah but 'Saw, we *missed* MrT's notes.
>
> /Don
>
True, and Jeff did go back and pull them all out from the archives.
No way in hell I'd do that with George's.....
|
155.1120 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Mar 17 1994 10:27 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1119 by CAMONE::WAY "Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks" >>>
>True, and Jeff did go back and pull them all out from the archives.
>No way in hell I'd do that with George's.....
Actually that was a pretty stupid discussion on both sides. I went through
and weeded out a lot of junk and I'd suggest others do that as well. I'm not
the only one who was not contributing to anyone's collectibles with that
discussion.
George
|
155.1121 | | CAMONE::WAY | Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks | Thu Mar 17 1994 10:33 | 10 |
| > Actually that was a pretty stupid discussion on both sides. I went through
>and weeded out a lot of junk and I'd suggest others do that as well. I'm not
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Guess you haven't spent much time around these parts.....
But, we'll take it under advisement.....
|
155.1122 | Anybody watch the World Figure Skating Championships. | OURGNG::RIGGEN | Atlanta Braves, Buffalo Bills, UNC Tar Heels | Mon Mar 28 1994 13:10 | 4 |
| Didn't think that without a good smack on the knee anybody would watch
just plain old figure skating.
Jeff
|
155.1123 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Shoveling that sunshine | Mon Mar 28 1994 13:17 | 3 |
| Kerrigan, Bauil, Bonaly, Elvis, Petrenko, and a host of others will be
skating here in June. My wife wanted to see them but only nosebleed
seats are left at $30/each.
|
155.1124 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Mon Mar 28 1994 13:19 | 5 |
|
C'mon Mike. It'll be 110 here in June. Think of the AC money you
could save.
brews
|
155.1125 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Shoveling that sunshine | Mon Mar 28 1994 13:19 | 1 |
| Already taken care of since we'll be gone the whole month of July.
|
155.1126 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Mar 28 1994 18:53 | 28 |
| RE<<< Note 155.1122 by OURGNG::RIGGEN "Atlanta Braves, Buffalo Bills, UNC Tar Heels" >>>
> -< Anybody watch the World Figure Skating Championships. >-
I saw the men skate on Friday, the pairs short program on Saturday afternoon
and the pairs final Sunday night. I missed the Saturday night show but from
what I heard Surya Bonaly France wasn't too happy with her 2nd place finish
and protested on the medal stand. The woman from Japan came in 1st place and
over in the skating notes file they seem to be saying that it was the correct
call.
Michele Kwan did ok. She came in 8th which was good enough to get the U.S.
two positions for next year. She's a pretty hot prospect for being in medal
contention in the '96-'98 time frame.
The woman in the Canadian pairs overcame a lot of pain from a broken rib
and they came in 2nd. A Russian couple won the gold medal. The U.S. pairs
also had injury problems as well as equipment problems and managed 6th or
7th which is good for 2 positions on next year's team.
Elvis Stoko (sp?) from Canada won the men's title and the guy from France
who does the God Father stuff came in 2nd. Elvis managed to land a quad triple
combination and skated a clean performance that would have defeated anyone.
Most of the big names from the Olympics didn't show up due to either injury,
retirement, or felony convictions.
George
|
155.1127 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Mon Mar 28 1994 22:02 | 9 |
| Michele Kwan did okay???
She looked like she was ready to pass peach stones and fell on her
kiester halfway through her routine.
Granted, she's just a youngster, but to say she did "alright" is a bit
much.
Mark.
|
155.1128 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 00:20 | 27 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1127 by CAPNET::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Product Management" >>>
> Michele Kwan did okay???
> She looked like she was ready to pass peach stones and fell on her
> kiester halfway through her routine.
> Granted, she's just a youngster, but to say she did "alright" is a bit
> much.
In skating, making the Nationals is considered really good. Making the
national team is considered very good. A top 10 finish at a major international
event like the Olympics or World Championships is outstanding.
In the Skating notes file someone said that she did two triple lutzes and a
triple flip. That's a pretty aggressive program. Remember, in the long program
skaters are rated on what they do, not what they fail to do as they are if they
miss mandatory elements in the short program.
By finishing in the top 10 she also earned the U.S. a 2nd spot on next year's
national team. Only by winning a medal could she have won the 3rd spot which
would have been pretty amazing for a 13 year old kid. Granted Oksana Bauil did
it last year but that's pretty unusual.
Considering her age, the fact that she was an alternate, and the fact that it
was her 1st time in international competition at the senior level she did
really well by just about any standard,
George
|
155.1129 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Tue Mar 29 1994 09:59 | 5 |
| Stoyko did the quad OK, but didn't finish the triple. My
wife and I happened to watch it last night. Just slightly
short on the triple.
Scott
|
155.1130 | Break the rules and still win? | STRATA::HUI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 11:49 | 16 |
| I am still confuse how the Russian won the ice dancing considering they fell in
the long program. It was right in front of the judges and it was clearly a
mistake.
I would have to give the gold to the Fins.
I also don't understand how they can break the rules that is clearly written
and still not be disqualify in this sport. Why even have the rules if it is
going to be broken anyway. Is just is not fair to the competitors who stick by
the rules.
I think this will be the last ice dancing I will ever watch. I am boycotting
this what so call sport.
Dave
|
155.1131 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 12:40 | 29 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1130 by STRATA::HUI >>>
> -< Break the rules and still win? >-
>I am still confuse how the Russian won the ice dancing considering they fell in
>the long program. It was right in front of the judges and it was clearly a
>mistake.
I didn't see it but in general a fall does not mean you can't win. Skaters
in ice dancing are judged on several things including synchronization, deep
edges, how well they follow the form of the dance, and several other things.
It's like asking how can a player on a baseball team commit an error and
they still win the ball game? Well they win because errors, like falls in
skating, are only one aspect. Other things count as well.
>I also don't understand how they can break the rules that is clearly written
>and still not be disqualify in this sport. Why even have the rules if it is
>going to be broken anyway. Is just is not fair to the competitors who stick by
>the rules.
Does a baseball player get disqualified if he breaks a rule? For example,
if a pitcher breaks the rules and fakes a pitch home then throws to 1st do
they disqualify his team and declare the other team the winner or do they just
call a balk and give the runner 2nd base?
In Ice dancing if you break a rule there is either a mandatory deduction or
you don't get points for the move depending on when you do it.
George
|
155.1132 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 29 1994 12:49 | 11 |
|
The real answer is that the standings in (non-sport) Ice Dancing
are predetermined and can only be changed by a papal decree. There
is no such thing as an upset, no such thing as a surprise finish.
The analogy to baseball doesn't wash because the results in base-
ball are tangible meaning an actual running score is kept. You could
suffer from an error but it is dependent upon the situation. In (non-
sport) Ice Dancing, how much you suffer from an error is completely
dependent upon the judges and the capricious manner with which
they apply the rules. The less prestige that you have, the more
you will be marked down.
|
155.1133 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 13:50 | 22 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1132 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> The real answer is that the standings in (non-sport) Ice Dancing
> are predetermined and can only be changed by a papal decree. There
> is no such thing as an upset, no such thing as a surprise finish.
You keep saying this but each time you do you just prove how little you know
about ice dancing which is why you have so little credibility when you discuss
this topic.
Answer this one, why did Torvell and Dean lose the gold medal in the Olympics
to the Russians after beating them in the European Championship just a month
earlier? Their reputation was the same, the only change during the month
between the two events was to their program including some lifts that the
judges didn't seem to like.
If your theory is true and the order is predetermined, then the order of the
European skaters should have been the same in both events regardless of what
they did on the ice but it was not. They went from 1st to 3rd. How could that
have possibly happened?
George
|
155.1134 | | CAMONE::WAY | Valor | Tue Mar 29 1994 14:08 | 5 |
| >judges didn't seem to like.
This is the crux of the matter in a nutshell....
|
155.1135 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 14:16 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1134 by CAMONE::WAY "Valor" >>>
>judges didn't seem to like.
This is the crux of the matter in a nutshell....
Right, just like saying "Umpires don't seem to like..." when calling
balls and strikes.
Now how long will Byrds and Way duck the question which obviously they
can't answer, if the judging is predetermined why did Torvell and Dean beat
the Russians in the European Championships in January then lose to them in
the Olympics a month later?
Duck and weave, duck and weave, toss up insults as a smoke screen ...
George
|
155.1136 | | CAMONE::WAY | Valor | Tue Mar 29 1994 14:37 | 21 |
| > Now how long will Byrds and Way duck the question which obviously they
>can't answer, if the judging is predetermined why did Torvell and Dean beat
>the Russians in the European Championships in January then lose to them in
>the Olympics a month later?
Why do we have to answer any of your questions, George? It's not like
we're measuring ourselves on our knowledge of anything or our debating
ability.
Ice Dancing is about as much of a sport as Maypole Dancing..... That's
all I need to know. As to the judging, it's laughable due to all the
agendas that each judge has....
You'd be closer in your analogy of judges to refs, if you went with something
like pass interference in football. Balls and strikes either are or they
aren't on or off the plate. The zone is high or low dependent on positioning.
At least with the PI call, the ref must call based on his judgement of
intent and all that crap.
'Saw
|
155.1137 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 14:51 | 25 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1136 by CAMONE::WAY "Valor" >>>
>Why do we have to answer any of your questions, George? It's not like
>we're measuring ourselves on our knowledge of anything or our debating
>ability.
I disagree. If you look at the attacks on ice dancing and on the people who
argue that it is a sport it is obvious that there is a very aggressive debate
going on. Byrdie manages to plop a slam against figure skating into just about
everything he and I discuss regardless of the topic.
Anyway, if you don't have an answer you don't have one. And it's no big
mystery why. The premise that ice dancing is predetermined and that performance
on the ice doesn't matter is just plane wrong.
You can go on banging your fist on your keyboard insisting that it is not
a sport but you can't answer a simple question, if ice dancing is predetermined
then why did Torvell and Dean beat the Russians in the European Championship
then lose to them a month later with a program that was loaded with illegal
lifts?
It's obvious, they lost the Olympics on the Ice and the judging was basically
correct.
George
|
155.1138 | | CAMONE::WAY | Valor | Tue Mar 29 1994 14:59 | 19 |
| > I disagree. If you look at the attacks on ice dancing and on the people who
>argue that it is a sport it is obvious that there is a very aggressive debate
>going on. Byrdie manages to plop a slam against figure skating into just about
>everything he and I discuss regardless of the topic.
Well, Georgie Boy, if you wanna measure yourself on something as silly
as ice dancing, and debating about it, hey, more power to ya, bud.
|
155.1139 | | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Tue Mar 29 1994 15:12 | 1 |
| I think we've plumbed the depths of this rathole before.
|
155.1140 | plumbing, while messy, in no sport | HBAHBA::HAAS | The karma ran over my dogma | Tue Mar 29 1994 15:13 | 0 |
155.1141 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 29 1994 15:26 | 8 |
|
I'll answer your question, Meow-ski. If anything your little
example provesd what I've been saying all along. Torville and
Dean *supposedly* commit this violation (no one has actually come
out and said that's why they got rooked) and yet still manage to
take a medal. Meanwhile, the Finns skate a fine program but can't
crack the medals. Why? The results are determined before the
event ever begins.
|
155.1142 | At least they're out of the bc note | AKOCOA::BREEN | Till Time Shall be no More | Tue Mar 29 1994 15:27 | 1 |
|
|
155.1143 | Double standard? | CTHQ::LEARY | It'sBeenALongTimeComing... | Tue Mar 29 1994 15:50 | 5 |
| So is Kerrigan still the whiny sore loser or has Bonaly "won" that
medal?
MikeL
|
155.1144 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:00 | 24 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1141 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
No, you ducked my question again. Here it is:
- In the European Championship in January Torvell and Dean beat the Russians.
- In the Olympics in February the Russians beat Torvell and Dean.
They were the same people, the only thing that changed was the program and
what they did on the ice.
If you are correct and this is all predetermined, then the results would
have been the same because they were the same skaters.
But you are wrong, the same skaters came in with a different order with
respect to each other based on what they did on the ice. Where the Fins
finished has nothing to do with this.
If you are right and the order is predetermined, why did the order of
the top skaters change in one month when the only thing that changed was
their program and how they performed on the ice.
Keep ducking and weaving, see if you can wiggle out of this one.
George
|
155.1145 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:03 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1143 by CTHQ::LEARY "It'sBeenALongTimeComing..." >>>
> So is Kerrigan still the whiny sore loser or has Bonaly "won" that
> medal?
Kerrigan is now the millionaire that works for the mouse. Bonaly has taken
over as the whiny sore loser.
Although Bonaly did issue an apology which seems to have muted the criticism
somewhat.
George
|
155.1146 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:11 | 10 |
|
> <<< Note 155.1136 by CAMONE::WAY "Valor" >>>
> Ice Dancing is about as much of a sport as Maypole Dancing.
Dammit Frank, yer messing things up for me. See, I been inviting
wimmens over to dance around my pole, and if'n they hear it ain't a
real sport, that'll be the end of it.
brews
|
155.1147 | | FRETZ::HEISER | Shoveling that sunshine | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:16 | 4 |
| George, did they have the same exact judges both times in your scenario?
Brews, you're crackin me up. BTW - how's life in your new Ivory Tower?
I get to do time their once in a while too now.
|
155.1148 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:27 | 10 |
|
>> They were the same people, the only thing that changed was the program and
>> what they did on the ice.
Not exactly a minor nit is it, My-eye-ski? By your own estimate T&D skated
"a program that was loaded with illegal lifts" and yet still manage to
pull down a medal and make a race of it. And you still can't see a caste
system in this non-sport? This baby was in the bag for the Russians from
the get-go. The discrepancy from the Euro champs to the Olympics can eas-
ily be explained by different judging orgs.
|
155.1149 | | SOLANA::MAY_BR | TFO has been TFSO'd | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:38 | 8 |
| > BTW - how's life in your new Ivory Tower? I get to do time their
> once in a while too now.
Much nicer than what we were in, TYVM. Was thinking of inviting Gin
over for a May pole dance, but she ain't here anymore. Well, we are
closer to May pole dance parlors, anyway.
brews
|
155.1150 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:46 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1148 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
No, you are still ducking the question. The illegal lifts resulted in
deductions that moved them down past the Russians but were not enough to move
them down past anyone else, just as an error in baseball can result in a runner
advancing but might not be enough to win or lose a game.
As for the different judges, try again. You said that the event was
predetermined and only a papal decree could result in a change. That suggests
one group making a decision and instructing the judges on how to judge rather
than individual judges deciding based on what they see.
Make up your mind, is this whole thing staged, prearranged, and predetermined
or is it a contest with a winner picked based on how they perform at the
competition?
If it's fixed, how were they able to keep this from the IOC without a single
challenge for the decades that the event has been going on and on what basis
were Torvell and Dean switched with the Russians between the two events?
George
|
155.1151 | the only one left! :^( | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:47 | 10 |
|
Yabbut Brews,
Since Gin's unavailable, remember Karen? I hear she does a mean,
mean maypole dance, especially after the 3rd drink!
I remain,
Hawk_in_Kev's_Account!
|
155.1152 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 29 1994 16:54 | 10 |
|
The analyst for CBS and T&D both said that the judges marked T&D
harder than anyone else because they were pros. The lifts were just
the excuse they needed. Tonya Harding had Nancy Kerrigan whacked
because she felt the judges preferred Nancy over herself and she
would never be able to beat Nancy because of it. So you see, by
the admissions of skaters and skating insiders, the standings are
predetermined with only the slightest adjustments for actual per-
formance. Sort of like the Westchester Dog Show and about as much
a sport.
|
155.1153 | | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Tue Mar 29 1994 17:02 | 5 |
| > Much nicer than what we were in, TYVM. Was thinking of inviting Gin
I'm afraid to ask what that means without you getting Jaked(tm). I was
there last Friday and was impressed. All you need now is valet
parking and a miniature golf course or driving range.
|
155.1154 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 17:10 | 27 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1152 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> The analyst for CBS and T&D both said that the judges marked T&D
> harder than anyone else because they were pros.
So if the order is predetermined and can only be changed by "papal decree",
why did the order between Torvell and Dean and the Russians change between the
European Championship in January and the Olympics in February?
Was there a papal decree?
Did the judges decide to flip the positions to make it look good?
Do they take turns?
Did the Russians pay off the judges between the European championship and
the Olympics?
And if they are fixing this event and for all these years all those judges
have been conspiring to predetermine a champion why has no one ever come
forward to report this? How is it possible that the IOC has been keep
completely unaware that this event is fixed?
And if the IOC is that bad at uncovering a fix, how do you know that athletes
in other events are not taking bribes to throw other Olympic events?
George
|
155.1155 | | MSBCS::BRYDIE | I need somebody to shove! | Tue Mar 29 1994 17:37 | 7 |
|
You're wasting your time and CAM's disk space, George. Skaters
and analysts have already stated that the judges have their minds
made up before hand. If you want to believe otherwise and that
professional women's wrestling in Japan is for real, go ahead.
I've seen the evidence and as an open-minded observer, I know
the results are pre-determined in both non-sports.
|
155.1156 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 17:45 | 13 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1155 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
Fine, just answer these questions and I'll go away.
If this is all predetermined and the Judges have made up their minds and
know in advance who is better and who should win, why don't the same skaters
win from event to event?
In particular, why did the judges pick Torvell and Dean over the Russians in
January then change their mind and put the Russians ahead of Torvell and Dean
in February?
George
|
155.1157 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Tue Mar 29 1994 17:54 | 6 |
| � If this is all predetermined and the Judges have made up their minds and
�know in advance who is better and who should win, why don't the same skaters
�win from event to event?
They may not win from event to event, but the top 10 finishers don't
change significantly, do they.
|
155.1158 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 18:05 | 21 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1157 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
> They may not win from event to event, but the top 10 finishers don't
> change significantly, do they.
That doesn't happen in tennis either, are you saying that tennis is fixed
and not a sport?
Anyway, the charge made is very serious. He's basically saying that the
judges get together before each event and decide on a fix which varies slightly
from event to event.
Considering that some of the contests have been so close, the only way that
they could predetermine a winner and still make it look that close would be to
actually decide what score each judge was going to give to each contestant.
That's one whopping conspiracy that's been going on for decades. I'm just
wondering how they got away with it for so long? If it's true then the IOC
has really had the wool pulled over their eyes for quite some time.
George
|
155.1159 | how I see it | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Mar 29 1994 18:26 | 34 |
|
Tennis is not applicaable in this discussion. Tennis players
truly play their sport head to head, which is NOT the case
in ice dancing. Judges in Tennis are used to make out of bounds
calls and the such. The judges in tennis do not contribute a
"rating" on the players performance.
My interpretation of "fixing" is that the current leaders
in ice dancing cannot be challenged by anybody new to the sport.
The champions may finish different in the standings, but it
always is the same names. This is what MAC alluded to in
the previous note.
Let me explain, and then you can explain to me.
In an ice dancing competition, the early participants do
not collect the marks, or scores, that they are capable of
receiving. The reasoning is that "we have to save the high
scores for the later skaters". Is this not correct?
If so, then the order of finishing is pre-determined, i.e. all
that a veteran has to do is basically show up, and not make too
many mistakes, and they will be assured of a higher score than
a skater that went early in the competition and skated flawlesly.
If this is not so, then please explain.
In my opinion, this pre-determines the order of the finishers.
It may not be the the actual 1-2-3 determination, but it does ensure
that the 'veterans' names appear in the 1-2-3 finish.
|
155.1160 | | AKOCOA::BREEN | Till Time Shall be no More | Tue Mar 29 1994 18:34 | 6 |
| I think this was Kerrigan's premise and cause of her ill concealed
anger. She felt she had paid her dues, had done the program without
flaws and it was her turn.
Of course the charades of one Tanya H. had her steaming and perhaps the
took it out on the Ukrainian ingenue
|
155.1161 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 18:43 | 43 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1159 by CSC32::GAULKE >>>
> Tennis is not applicaable in this discussion. Tennis players
> truly play their sport head to head, which is NOT the case
> in ice dancing.
No it does apply. Mac seemed to be suggesting that the fact that the results
were similar is evidence in itself that the event is fixed. I pointed to
tennis as an example of another sport where the results are similar from
event to event but most people feel it is not fixed.
> In an ice dancing competition, the early participants do
> not collect the marks, or scores, that they are capable of
> receiving. The reasoning is that "we have to save the high
> scores for the later skaters". Is this not correct?
Not really. The scores given are relative scores, not absolute scores. If I
were a judge and knew that better skaters were coming I might give someone who
was pretty good a 5.5. Then if someone skated better I might give that person a
5.7. If they skated worse, a 5.3.
If it were the last skater and they did a really good job, then I'd give them
the highest mark. It really wouldn't matter all that much if it were a 5.9 or a
6.0 since the ordinal would come out the same in either case.
> If so, then the order of finishing is pre-determined, i.e. all
> that a veteran has to do is basically show up, and not make too
> many mistakes, and they will be assured of a higher score than
> a skater that went early in the competition and skated flawlesly.
Not so. If the earlier skater had been given a 5.6 and the older skater came
and did worse they would get a lower score. The "make room" expression means
that they would restrain themselves from giving the earlier skater a 6.0 so
that if the older skater did better they could give them a higher score but it
does not guarantee that the older skater would get that high score if they
didn't skate well.
An example is Katerian Witt who skated last in the Olympic long program. They
gave Baiul and Kerrigan scores in the high 5's which "made room" for Witt in
case she skated the performance of her life but she didn't manage it and she
was marked down ending up around 7th place.
George
|
155.1162 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Mar 29 1994 18:48 | 15 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1160 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Till Time Shall be no More" >>>
> I think this was Kerrigan's premise and cause of her ill concealed
> anger. She felt she had paid her dues, had done the program without
> flaws and it was her turn.
No, Kerrigan said that the reason she was upset with the judging was that
she skated a clean program and Baiul two footed the landing on a couple jumps.
She felt that she had earned the gold medal with her performance.
In fact, that did win her the technical mark but two footing a landing doesn't
detract as much from the presentation mark which was won by Baiul. Since the
presentation mark was the tie breaker, Baiul won the gold medal.
George
|
155.1163 | My two cents on skating. | BSS::MENDEZ | | Tue Mar 29 1994 19:13 | 10 |
| The part that has me bothered George is the presentation marks.
It was plainly stated during the olympics and other skating events
that most of the judges prefer the traditional program. For example
the more soft orchestra type music as opposed to contemporary music.
The presentation of one type of music CANNOT be accurately judged
against another entirely different type of music. Hence to ME
presentation scores are at best biased leaning to bogus.
Frank Mendez
|
155.1164 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Tue Mar 29 1994 19:19 | 67 |
|
re: tennis
No, it is not applicable. Tennis is a head to head sport.
Ice Dancing is not. The reason that tennis is not suspected to
have a pre-determined order of finish is because, in tennis,
as well as 99% of other sports, they compete against each other.
In ice-dancing, the competitors do NOT compete against each other.
>> Not really. The scores given are relative scores, not absolute scores. If I
>>were a judge and knew that better skaters were coming I might give someone who>
>>was pretty good a 5.5. Then if someone skated better I might give that person a
>>5.7. If they skated worse, a 5.3.
So, if an early competitor skates flawlessy, a perfect performance, you
would only give them a 5.5. (to save room). And what do you base
the "better skaters coming along" reasoning? You base it on
previous performances. Why are previous performances involved?
Isn't the CURRENT performance the one that counts?
What you're saying here is that you can't apply the scoring evenly
across all competitors, because there are veteran skaters that COULD be
better than the early performers, and you have to "save room". Is this
simply because ties are not allowed?
>> If it were the last skater and they did a really good job, then I'd give them
>> the highest mark.
Since the first skater was flawless but only received a 5.6 (or whatever)
how it is fair that the last skater could receive a higher score for only
being "really good". Again, this weighs the results in favor of the later
skaters. This is a pre-determined order of finish.
> If so, then the order of finishing is pre-determined, i.e. all
> that a veteran has to do is basically show up, and not make too
> many mistakes, and they will be assured of a higher score than
> a skater that went early in the competition and skated flawlesly.
>> The "make room" expression means that they would restrain themselves from
>>giving the earlier skater a 6.0 so
>>that if the older skater did better they could give them a higher score but it
>>does not guarantee that the older skater would get that high score if they
>>didn't skate well.
No it does not guarantee a higher score if the veteran skater does not
skate well. But it does guarantee a higher score if the veteran skater
"goes through the motions" and does not, well, does not fall.
> An example is Katerian Witt who skated last in the Olympic long program. They
>gave Baiul and Kerrigan scores in the high 5's which "made room" for Witt in
>case she skated the performance of her life but she didn't manage it and she
>was marked down ending up around 7th place.
This is a perfect example of my viewpoint. They had to "leave room". To
me, this means that the performers did not receive the scores they were
capable of receiving, because they had to 'leave room'.
How is this system fair?
As I said earlier, this system weighs the scoring in favor of the later
skaters in the competition. The result? It prevents competitors from being
judged on their current performance. This is a pre-determined
order of finish.
|
155.1165 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Mar 30 1994 10:02 | 7 |
| If the results weren't pre-determined to an extremely high degree,
why did the same skaters end up in the same positions in the 4-15
range for both technical short programs and the long program ?
Also, as mentioned, the judges were slightly different. It wouldn't
surprise me to know that any judges who judged both the European
championships and the Olympics voted exactly the same way.
|
155.1167 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Jim Halpin | Wed Mar 30 1994 10:15 | 21 |
|
> Considering that some of the contests have been so close, the only way that
>they could predetermine a winner and still make it look that close would be to
>actually decide what score each judge was going to give to each contestant.
No George, they wouldn't! All they would have to do is decide
who they wanted to win. Then each individual judge would just make sure
that skater received the first ordinal score he/she hands out.
As you yourself pointed out in a later note, the scores themselves
are relative, not absolute. This makes it amazing easy for the judges
to predetermine who wins, without having to assign actual scores ahead
of time!
Right???
JimH
|
155.1168 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 30 1994 10:23 | 6 |
| � No it does apply. Mac seemed to be suggesting that the fact that the results
�were similar is evidence in itself that the event is fixed. I pointed to
�tennis as an example of another sport where the results are similar from
�event to event but most people feel it is not fixed.
Sorry, George, but Steve understood exactly what I was saying.
|
155.1169 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 30 1994 10:27 | 5 |
| � In fact, that did win her the technical mark but two footing a landing doesn't
�detract as much from the presentation mark which was won by Baiul. Since the
�presentation mark was the tie breaker, Baiul won the gold medal.
And how many other sports value style over skill?
|
155.1170 | rassling????? ;^) | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Wed Mar 30 1994 10:30 | 1 |
|
|
155.1172 | | GENRAL::WADE | So, what's on your alleged mind? | Wed Mar 30 1994 11:10 | 4 |
|
Gymnastics?
Claybone
|
155.1173 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 11:15 | 17 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1165 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
> If the results weren't pre-determined to an extremely high degree,
> why did the same skaters end up in the same positions in the 4-15
> range for both technical short programs and the long program ?
... for the same reason that unseeded tennis players almost never beat
the top tennis players. There is a minimum amount of luck involved in both
tennis and skating so the better players almost always beat the lesser
players.
In golf, there is lots of luck involved "the rub of the green" and the
difference between the top players is not as great so it is far more common
to see different players win each week. It's just the nature of how much
luck is involved in the sport.
George
|
155.1174 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 11:34 | 50 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1164 by CSC32::GAULKE >>>
> [Witt] is a perfect example of my viewpoint. They had to "leave room". To
>me, this means that the performers did not receive the scores they were
>capable of receiving, because they had to 'leave room'.
>
> How is this system fair?
It's fair because the only thing that matters is how the skaters are marked
relative to each other. If there are 3 skaters in an event (A, B, and C) and
you believe that C skated best, B next best, and A worst it wouldn't matter if
you marked them 4.8, 4.5, 4.2 respectively, or 5.8, 3.5, 1.2 respectively, they
would come in the same order and receive the same ordinals.
>Isn't the CURRENT performance the one that counts?
Yes but only the ORDER of that performance is important, the absolute score
is not important. I'm not an expert on this but here is the way I've heard that
it works.
Regardless if judges are doing Novice 7 year olds from Manchester N.H or a
world class event in Paris the method is the same. Each individual judge
watches the practice sessions and develops a standard to be used to judge that
particular set of skaters during the performance. They decide ahead of time
what type of performance would be perfect, outstanding, very good, average, not
so good, or poor (i.e. 6s, 5s, 4s, 3s, 2s, or 1s).
On the night of the performance they watch each skater and grade what they
see during that performance according to that predetermined standard with the
presentation being subjective and the technical portion being more objective.
It is the standard that is predetermined, not the score of an individual
skater.
Obviously what would earn a skater a 5.7 at the Novice 7 year old skateoff in
Manchester would not earn a 5.7 in a world class event but that doesn't matter.
The only reason for the marks is to order the skaters so that an ordinal score
can be calculated.
So if they know that a better skater is coming along and rate the skaters
(AND THAT FINAL SKATER) from 5.0 to 5.7 instead of 5.3 to 6.0 it doesn't
matter. As long as they put them in the same order they will end up with
the same ordinal values and the results will come out the same.
Again, the scores are relative scores not absolute scores. It's not a
question of whether a skater deserves a 5.7 or a 6.0 it's a matter of whether
or not they are ahead or behind the other skaters. That's why the entire field
is graded lower to make room for a better skater at the end. If that skater
messes up they will also be graded lower and the order will be maintained.
George
|
155.1175 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Wed Mar 30 1994 11:40 | 13 |
| Since when has practice counted for anything?? That is like saying that
an umpire watches a pitcher warmup and then decide how to call balls
and strikes that night? Its like an umpire watching batting practice and
deciding that if the ball can't be swatted out of the park the pitch
will be called a ball.
It means that if one competitor has a worse practice than the other one
then they need to do less to get a better score.
Try again.
The Crazy Met
|
155.1176 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Wed Mar 30 1994 11:42 | 19 |
| > <<< Note 155.1173 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
>
>RE <<< Note 155.1165 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
>
>> If the results weren't pre-determined to an extremely high degree,
>> why did the same skaters end up in the same positions in the 4-15
>> range for both technical short programs and the long program ?
>
> ... for the same reason that unseeded tennis players almost never beat
>the top tennis players. There is a minimum amount of luck involved in both
>tennis and skating so the better players almost always beat the lesser
>players.
How can that explain a person falling and still getting EXACTLY the same
position that they get for both of the other two rounds ?
Also, do you deny that most commentators state that they believe there is
a pre-determined mind set by the judges ?
|
155.1178 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 30 1994 12:15 | 3 |
| � Gymnastics?
Some have argued that gymnastics is in the same class as skating.
|
155.1179 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 30 1994 12:17 | 6 |
| � In golf, there is lots of luck involved "the rub of the green" and the
�difference between the top players is not as great so it is far more common
�to see different players win each week.
Part of the skill set required for golf is ability to read the
environment (wind, green bias, etc.). Good golfers don't rely on luck.
|
155.1180 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 12:32 | 12 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1175 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>
>Since when has practice counted for anything?? That is like saying that
>an umpire watches a pitcher warmup and then decide how to call balls
>and strikes that night?
>It means that if one competitor has a worse practice than the other one
>then they need to do less to get a better score.
Met, you are half reading again. Read the rest of my note where I explain
what you obviously missed.
George
|
155.1181 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 12:42 | 34 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1176 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
> How can that explain a person falling and still getting EXACTLY the same
> position that they get for both of the other two rounds ?
For the 1,000,000th time, falling in a major program does not detract all
that much from the score. In the long program it's more what you do rather than
what you fail to do.
If you fall doing a mandatory element in an early round, you lose lots of
points. If you fall in a long program you lose almost nothing because there are
no mandatory elements in the final program.
> Also, do you deny that most commentators state that they believe there is
> a pre-determined mind set by the judges ?
I have no idea. There are literally tens of thousands of people around the
world skating competitively. As with all sports, we only hear the most
controversal sound bites from the top fraction of a percent of the skaters.
If someone like Kerrigan stood in front of the camera 1000 times and said she
felt the judging was fair then one time when she was pissed off blurted out
that it was unfair, the media would play that sound bite to death and most
sports fans would believe that "skaters believe judging is unfair".
The fact that thousands of people dedicate their lives to this sport, the top
athletes get interviewed hundreds of times each, and there are only a handful
of negative comments - most often spoken by skaters who have just lost - would
indicate to me that in general skaters are not all that unhappy with the
judging of events.
Remember, guys like Dan Shaunausy live off people who believe sound bites.
George
|
155.1182 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 12:47 | 20 |
| Re <<< Note 155.1177 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
-< ex >-
> The *HUGE* difference, of course, is that in tennis there is real
> and actual point by point scoring whereas in figure skating it is
> up to the whim of the judges.
You keep saying this over and over but you can't seem to back it up.
Your claim that the outcome of skating events is predetermined still makes
no sense. You now say that you don't believe in a conspiracy so tell me how
do the judges manage to make the contests look so close and still predetermine
the winner?
If there had been one "slip up" by one judge in the Kerrigan/Baiul contest
their "predetermined plan" to give Baiul the gold medal would have been down
the drain. If there is no conspiracy, how do they make predetermined winner
come out on top in the close ones?
George
|
155.1184 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 30 1994 13:14 | 9 |
| � The fact that thousands of people dedicate their lives to this sport, the top
�athletes get interviewed hundreds of times each, and there are only a handful
�of negative comments - most often spoken by skaters who have just lost - would
�indicate to me that in general skaters are not all that unhappy with the
�judging of events.
It says to me that they are smart enough to keep their mouths shut and
work within the system rather than shoot their mouths off and be
penalized for it by a poor score further down the road.
|
155.1185 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Mar 30 1994 13:38 | 98 |
|
>> ... for the same reason that unseeded tennis players almost never beat
>>the top tennis players. There is a minimum amount of luck involved in both
>>tennis and skating so the better players almost always beat the lesser
>>players.
Minimum amount of luck involved in skating? It would seem to me
that ice dancing is judged 30% on skill, and 70% on presentation.
When folks fall, miss jumps, do illegal lifts, and still score higher
than earlier skaters that HAVE SKATED BETTER, that says that presentation
has a much, much higher weight than skill.
Anyway, what is presentation?
It's totally subjective criteria. Being such, it's pure luck if the
Czech judge likes or dislikes your costume, or the beat to the music.
There's no skill involved when the criteria is subjective in nature.
>> On the night of the performance they watch each skater and grade what they
>>see during that performance according to that predetermined standard with the
>>presentation being subjective and the technical portion being more objective.
WHAT!?!?! Scores, or standards, are based on what happens in practice?
This is an eye opener.
And, the technical portion being "more objective"? Don't you think
that technical portions should be completely objective?
>>It is the standard that is predetermined, not the score of an individual
>>skater.
If you're basing a standard on what goes on in practice, then you are
basing your scoring on what goes on in practice. You are pre-determining
the scoring, before the competition even begins!!
Let's get to some basic steps...
Skaters A, B and C are sheduled to skate in an evening.
Skater A goes first and skates a perfect program. Hits all the jumps,
DOESN'T FALL. Beeyootifullll!!
But, since it's the first skater, they only get a 5.5. Have to 'leave room'.
NOW, STOP! Skater A only received a 5.5. BUT, if she skated later
in the evening, she would score a 6.0, because she's the last skater.
Same performance, opposite ends of the scoring spectrum. This is fair?
Right off the bat, skater C is spotted half a point.
Back to skating..
Skater B splits his pants on a triple lutz, is out of the competition.
Now we have skater C, who does the program, and falls once, or does
an illegal lift, or whatever. But, because of this standard that was
based on a practice(!!!) session, skater C could, and 99% of the time does,
scores a higher mark.
So, because of this practice-based standard, and the 'leave-room'
requirement, skater C wins even though A was better in this performance!!
And why did skater C receive a higher score? Because the performance
was already weighted in favor of C. As soon as skater A hits the ice,
they know they can do no better than a 5.5, or 5.6.
Any time you have a competitor that can give an inferior performance
but receive a higher score for that inferior performance, based
on what they've done in practice and previous performances, you have scoring
that is pre-determined.
>> Again, the scores are relative scores not absolute scores. It's not a
>>question of whether a skater deserves a 5.7 or a 6.0 it's a matter of whether
>>or not they are ahead or behind the other skaters.
>>That's why the entire field
>>is graded lower to make room for a better skater at the end. If that skater
>>messes up they will also be graded lower and the order will be maintained.
There's that term again. Relative. Relative to practice, relative
to previous performances. This is weighting the scoring, this
is weighting the standard. And all this happens before the
competition even starts.
This is pre-determining the order of finish. As has been shown, skater A
has little or no chance to beat skater C, simply because we have
this 'make-room' junk, based on past performances. If we have scores, or
standards that are based on past performances, we are pre-determining
the order of finish.
George, for my own information, can you name just ONE other sport
that scores the current competition with a weight on what has happened
in practice? I certainly can't think of any.
|
155.1186 | | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Mar 30 1994 13:38 | 3 |
| BBBBBBBUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!
Where's that bloody next unseen button? Ah.
|
155.1187 | Skip with n u | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Mar 30 1994 13:45 | 1 |
| Key in n u.That's what I do on all the Winter Olympics notes.
|
155.1188 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:07 | 11 |
| <<< Note 155.1183 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
So let me get this straight. Now you are claiming that no judge in the
history of figure skating has ever considered anything that goes on during a
performance? And what, the people who run these events can't see this or are
unable to just once come up with someone who will consider what is going on
during the contest?
That's almost as much of a stretch as the giant conspiracy theory.
George
|
155.1189 | It is the scoring that is mal-oderous | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:14 | 8 |
| George
I thought Steven summed up the competition pretty well. What is
your response? By the way I do think that the competitors are
great athletes. It is the scoring that is extremely suspect.
Frank Mendez
|
155.1190 | | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:16 | 5 |
| > their finale. While Y number may have sufficient for the Euro's,
> the Russian pair had added a couple of more X's and T&D never stood
> a chance. Simple, no?
Sure is. The Commie judges outnumbered the West.
|
155.1191 | | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:19 | 2 |
| I think the Warren Commission should judge figure skating in the next
Olympics.
|
155.1192 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:30 | 9 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1189 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>
> I thought Steven summed up the competition pretty well. What is
> your response? By the way I do think that the competitors are
> great athletes. It is the scoring that is extremely suspect.
Who's Steven? I didn't see that name. Can you point to a note?
George
|
155.1193 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:44 | 58 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1185 by CSC32::GAULKE >>>
> If you're basing a standard on what goes on in practice, then you are
>basing your scoring on what goes on in practice. You are pre-determining
>the scoring, before the competition even begins!!
No, because the important thing in the scoring is the order not the absolute
score. The standard for the group is predetermined but the order in which the
skaters are judged against that standard depends entirely on how they skate
during the performance.
> NOW, STOP! [Skater C skates better than Skater A but] Skater A only
>received a 5.5. BUT, if she skated later
>in the evening, she would score a 6.0, because she's the last skater.
>Same performance, opposite ends of the scoring spectrum. This is fair?
No, you still don't understand. Say Skater C skates better than skater A.
If skater C goes 1st they might give her a 5.8 to "make room" for skater A
but if skater A doesn't skate as well she will get less than 5.8 like 5.7.
Had they gone in the opposite order and Skater A had received the 5.7 first
then Skater C did better yes, Skater C might get a 6.0 instead of a 5.8 but so
what? A 6.0 doesn't beat 5.7 any more than 5.8 does. The Ordinals for those
two skaters will still be the same. In either case, Skater C will receive a
better ordinal than Skater A based on the fact that she skated better than
Skater A.
> Now we have skater C, who does the program, and falls once, or does
>an illegal lift, or whatever. But, because of this standard that was
>based on a practice(!!!) session, skater C could, and 99% of the time does,
>scores a higher mark.
No, the standard is only the measure by which they are all judged. If skater
C did worse during the performance than she did during practice her mark would
be lower based on the performance only.
For example, Brian Batino skated very well during practice and helped to
establish a high standard by which they were all judged but he flubed the short
program and was marked down based on how he did during the performance.
> Any time you have a competitor that can give an inferior performance
>but receive a higher score for that inferior performance, based
>on what they've done in practice and previous performances, you have scoring
>that is pre-determined.
This never happens. Again, the practice is only used to develop the one
standard by which all skaters are judged. It is not used to develop a standard
for each skater. The skaters performance during the competition is measured
against the one standard that they all helped to create during practice and
previous events.
I suspect that the misunderstanding about this is where a lot of these claims
are coming from saying "skaters say the scores are predetermined". What they
are saying is that the standard by which they are all judged is predetermined
and that their practice sessions helped to create that standard. How they score
depends only on how they skate during the event.
George
|
155.1194 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:45 | 1 |
| George, Frank is referring to notes by Mr. (Steven) Gaulke.
|
155.1195 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 14:47 | 8 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1194 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
> George, Frank is referring to notes by Mr. (Steven) Gaulke.
Ok Mac, I guess I got the right one.
Thanks,
George
|
155.1196 | | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:01 | 21 |
|
I understand perfectly George.
We have a practice. We set a standard.
If I am the first skater in a competition, and I skate above that
standard, I am guaranteed to
GET A LOWER SCORE
than if I was a veteran and performed the SAME ROUTINE in the
end of the competition.
If I am the first skater in a competition, and perform a perfect
program, skate above the pre-determined standard, or score,
a 'veteran' skater can come in, perform the EXACT SAME
performance, have a spill, but still score higher than me.
|
155.1197 | I smell a fish in ice skating | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:06 | 11 |
| George,
If they can determine the order before the final competition and
if they can determine the standard before the actual competition,
How can this be determined as a competition. I always thought
that practice was for working out kinks in your performance. Are
you telling me that perhaps a practice will have a say in your
score. And by the way if the order is more important than the score
than why give scores at all?
Frank
|
155.1198 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:08 | 8 |
| ... but do you understand that it doesn't matter what the actual number is
because the skaters will be placed in the proper order regardless of when they
skate?
If you skated best and 2nd place who skated later was 5.6, why would you care
that you only got a 5.8 instead of a 6.0? You would still get the #1 ordinal.
George
|
155.1199 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:14 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1197 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>
> If they can determine the order before the final competition and
> if they can determine the standard before the actual competition,
The DON'T determine the finishing order before the competition!!!! The
only "order" that is determined before the competition is the order in which
they skate (i.e. who skates 1st, who skates 2nd, etc.).
Before the competition they determine the strength of the field by which each
skater will be measured and the order in which they will skate.
As they skate, they rate the skaters with numbers like 3.8 and 5.7 to show
how each skater did relative to the average ability of this particular field.
When the competition is over, they add up the scores and compare the skaters
scores to each other to determine "ordinals", i.e. the order in which they
finished.
George
|
155.1200 | I don't know what else to say. | CSC32::GAULKE | | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:31 | 8 |
|
As the finely honed points of the magnificent bull elks' antlers
perforated his spleen, lungs, and lower colon, Lenny the Drifter
wished he had stayed working the street in Times Square, instead
of going up to the Rockies where this dumb animal had figured
out that three-card monte was a con, and gored him.
|
155.1202 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:44 | 21 |
| The thing you seem to be hung up on is that you see a problem between a
better skater beating someone 5.8 to 5.6 instead of 6.0 to 5.8 Is that
correct?
I'm just curious, do you see that this scoring problem you are talking about
has nothing to do with the order in which they finish? In C, the following
boolean expressions are both TRUE
(6.0 > 5.8)
(5.8 > 5.6)
what difference does it make which one you use, you get the same result?
Remember, the marks like 3.8 and 5.7 are not determined on how the skaters
skate against each other, they are determined on how they each skate against
the average strength of the field.
It's sort of like golf where a score is based on how you do against the
course, not how you do against the other golfer.
George
|
155.1203 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:49 | 23 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1201 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
> I like that, Steve. And I agree with both you and Frank Mendez
> on this one. But you'll catch hell getting George to change his
> mind as I'm sure you've already noticed.
Yeah, you probably will.
I still believe that the problem here is that you guys just don't understand
the algorithm. You are assuming it works one way when it really works another.
If your assumptions were correct I'd agree also but they are not. It just
doesn't work the way you think it does.
Biggest mistake you guys are making is that you just don't understand that
the scores are given based on how the skater's performance during the
competition compares to the average strength of the field and that the order is
kept correct regardless of the absolute number given to the skater.
Someone tell me, why do you care that someone wins 5.8 to 5.6 instead of 6.0
to 5.8? It's still the same guy wearing the gold medal.
George
|
155.1206 | Thankful for n u | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Wed Mar 30 1994 16:58 | 2 |
| The way this LDUC is going the number of post olympic notes will
outnumber the olympic ones... and I don't think I've read any of them!
|
155.1207 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Wed Mar 30 1994 17:00 | 11 |
| � It's sort of like golf where a score is based on how you do against the
�course, not how you do against the other golfer.
I take it you know as much about golf as you do about hockey. Whether
or not you win a golf tournament depends on how well you did against
the other golfers, not how well you did against the course. What
matters in the end is how many strokes it took you to put the ball into
18 different holes. Yes, they figure out how far above or below par
you are, but the bottom line is if you are further below par than
anyone else (i.e. you've hit the ball fewer times than anyone else),
you win.
|
155.1208 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I've got to crack this ice and fly | Wed Mar 30 1994 17:07 | 7 |
| MAC,
Golf is man .vs. course fer the mosted part, unless yer talking full
contact golf.
JaKe
|
155.1209 | Does anyone recall.... | AKOCOA::BREEN | Till Time Shall be no More | Wed Mar 30 1994 17:19 | 19 |
| Although it wasn't necessarily figure skating does anyone recall the
event where one of the judges mis-identified one of the premier
contestants, mixing her up with the pack, and scoring her simply on her
merits which in this case were low (or possibly were on a par with the
premier contestants but couldn't be scored that way because the top
scores were all allotted).
And the Toronto '92 world series star, Sprague is married to the
American synchronized swimmer who won a gold medal on a judging mishap
but probably not what I just described.
As I recall, although the judge (above p1) scored the skater as she saw
it there was an uproar to have the low score modified to reflect a
"premier" skater.
Incidents like this and the east bloc-west bloc results (not to mention
that the sports like this are simply boring) have lost me.
btw Is the Miss America pageant a sport?
|
155.1210 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I've got to crack this ice and fly | Wed Mar 30 1994 17:24 | 11 |
|
>> It's sort of like golf where a score is based on how you do against the
>>course, not how you do against the other golfer.
Skating ain't nuthin like golf. In golf yer scoring is absolute, you
miss the putt, ya adds another stroke to yer score. In skating, it's
more a freaking popularity contest wif the judges and how much pee-pee
smooching ya do.
JaKe
|
155.1211 | Help I've been sucked in and cant get out | BSS::MENDEZ | | Wed Mar 30 1994 17:25 | 8 |
| George
The biggest problem I have right now...Is that I have been sucked into
a LDUC on something that may not even be a sport. The judging is
subjective and therefore questionable in MY eyes.
Frank
|
155.1212 | | MSE1::FRANCUS | Mets in '94 | Wed Mar 30 1994 17:32 | 11 |
| Back in the late 80's when Boitano was dominating the US figure skating
circuit an up and coming competitor was asked the following:
if he skated a perfect routine did he have a chance to beat Boitano if
Boitano faltered?
The skater smiled, thought a minute, and said no.
That sums it up.
The Crazy Met
|
155.1213 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I've got to crack this ice and fly | Wed Mar 30 1994 17:48 | 8 |
|
>>That sums it up.
We all wish is were that easy, TCM, but there's one in here who will
insist that it's not twue, it's not twue!!!
JaKe
|
155.1214 | Name a single great upset in Figure Skating | OURGNG::RIGGEN | How to parlay 1K into 100K by Hillary R. | Wed Mar 30 1994 18:21 | 6 |
| In football = NY Jets
Baseball = 69 Mets
Golf = John Daly
Tennis = Mike Chang
Figure Skating = There has not been an upset.
|
155.1215 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 09:33 | 10 |
| > -< Name a single great upset in Figure Skating >-
Uh, George when Tommy and I get him cranked?
>Figure Skating = There has not been an upset.
Gotta be a sport to have an upset.
|
155.1216 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Mar 31 1994 10:53 | 24 |
| Back a month or so I made the statement that I have never seen a case where
someone who understood the basic fundamentals of figure skating and understood
the scoring has said it was not a sport.
Every single person claiming that it is not a sport can't tell a Lutz from a
toe loop and struggles to understand how ordinals are computed which is the
baseball equivalent of not knowing a single from a fielders choice or
understanding how baserunners get turned into runs.
Anyway, if anyone decides to discuss this again, just ask a question or type
something in that indicates you have a legitimate criticism based on some
knowledge of what is actually going on and I'll be happy to discuss it again.
By the way, someone said that college basketball was much more popular than
skating. Turns out not in the Boston area. The TV ratings for last week showed
the two B.C. games getting the highest sports ratings but the Figure Skating
ratings were tucked right in after the two Arkansas games and before all the
other games, this despite the fact that no American skaters were in contention
for medals.
So yeah if no Americans are in contention and a local school makes the sweet
sixteen sure but with equal local interest the claim is false.
George
|
155.1217 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 11:00 | 18 |
| > Back a month or so I made the statement that I have never seen a case where
>someone who understood the basic fundamentals of figure skating and understood
>the scoring has said it was not a sport.
Try listening to the FAN.
Back during the Olympic coverage they had someone one (forget his name,
but it wasn't a caller in, it was a guest) who understood skating and
still figured it wasn't a sport. Competition, perhaps, an art form yes,
physically demanding, yes, but not a sport....
Why, if figure skating is sport, with its judged scoring system, and
criteria for all those lutzes and toe loops, and things you love so much,
then so is my job, because I get scored the same way.... Just have one
judge called a manager.....
'Saw
|
155.1218 | LDUC= ???? | DELNI::CRITZ | Scott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3 | Thu Mar 31 1994 11:01 | 5 |
| A brief pause...
What does the acronym LDUC mean?
Scott
|
155.1219 | just an idea... | MKFSA::LONG | That's my story and I'm stickin' to it! | Thu Mar 31 1994 11:03 | 7 |
| Hey, I've got a novel idea. Why doesn't someone start a figure
skating notes file, WHOCARES::FIGURE_SKATING, then the rest of
us don't have to wear out out NEXT UNSEEN key and, George, you
might find someone who shares your interests.
billl
|
155.1223 | keep on keeping on | HBAHBA::HAAS | The karma ran over my dogma | Thu Mar 31 1994 11:30 | 10 |
| George,
Don't take any crap about ratholes, endless and/or pointless discussions,
or heated debates over semi-non-issues. It is the privilege - nay, right
- of ::SPROTSters everywhere to engage in these sort of things.
And whatever you do, don't make the mistake I did which was to accept the
other side of the argument. You won't believe the crap you'll get.
TTom
|
155.1224 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Mar 31 1994 11:40 | 10 |
| Ok, will do.
So Tommy, did you ask either of those little old ladies out? Sounds to me
like a match made in NCAA heaven.
By the way, skating comes to baseball. The Red Sox have announced that Olympic
silver medalist and the Mouse's best friend Nancy Kerrigan will be throwing out
the 1st ball at Fenway Park.
George
|
155.1225 | now that's just gross! | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Thu Mar 31 1994 12:23 | 1 |
|
|
155.1226 | For George... | BSS::MENDEZ | | Thu Mar 31 1994 12:41 | 12 |
| You know George you really got me ticked. You have the audacity to
question MY knowledge of figure skating because I do not agree with
you. I am kind of proud to not be in your circle of acquaintances
that agree with you concerning skating. You have not fully understood
my beef with figure skating. I have not stated that figure skating
was not a sport. I have questioned its integrity due to the rather
LARGE amount of subjectivity in its scoring. If you have a problem
with that...well I am sorry. But remember this is SPROTS and you
my friend need to lighten up.
Frank Mendez
|
155.1227 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:34 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1226 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>
> You know George you really got me ticked. You have the audacity to
> question MY knowledge of figure skating because I do not agree with
> you. ... I have not stated that figure skating
> was not a sport.
Well if you are not one of the ones saying it's not a sport then you are not
one of the ones that I'm talking about so it's not clear why you are ticked.
George
|
155.1228 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:37 | 6 |
| Well, George, being a sports fan is enough qualification for me to
discuss whether or not a particular activity is a sport.
BTW, using your requirements of being a figure skating expert, I think
you should give up the baseball and golf analogies to remain
consistent.
|
155.1229 | | CSC32::M_MACGREGOR | | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:46 | 32 |
|
George,
Be careful who you attack in here. I think there are some legimit (sp)
complaints about how the scoring is done. Nobody disagrees that there
isn't a subjective part of this scoring, even you have said so. People
are disagreeing about whether the scoring is weighted towards the top
competors, much as the boxing belief that a champion can not lose a
close fight even if he should. Whether or not this is true is up for
debate, but I think it seems to be true, even if it is not done
intentionally. I happen to belief in this weighting principle and
accept it for what it is used/intended. What you are suggesting is
that because I believe in this I am not knowledgable about the sport
(please correct me if I read your response incorrectly) I can tell the
difference between the jumps, I know how the scoring works and I
believe that skating is a sport (n. 1. An active pastime, recreation
2. A specific diversion, USUALLY involving physical exercise and having
a set form and body of rules) I also suspect that there are many other
mostly read only noters that feel the same way.
As for everyone involved in this "discussion", it never fails to amaze
me how when someone says A, the next person says "how dare you say B"
It would appear that, in general, the school systems did not teach
reading comprehension. Or using great leaps of logic (if a horse has 4
legs and a table has four legs, then a horse must be a table) to prove
points to support your arguments.
I think both "sides" have made very good points and have ignored what
the other has said, I suppose this should not surprise me anymore.
Marc
|
155.1230 | Enough already | OPTION::LAZARUS | David Lazarus @KYO,323-4353 | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:52 | 4 |
| .1229 was very well said and should be the final word on this LDUC.
To save the readers of this conference time,the CAM disk space and
network bandwith,I suggest the moderators set this note to nowrite and
ask that this be taken offline.
|
155.1231 | THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN WRITE-LOCKED! | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:54 | 1 |
|
|
155.1232 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:56 | 7 |
|
MikeH,
If you can write-lock this topic that would be a real neat trick.
The Crazy Met
|
155.1233 | ;-) | FRETZ::HEISER | another day in DECrestaurant | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:58 | 1 |
| Well that trick has worked before in other conferences.
|
155.1234 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 14:59 | 13 |
| Sorry, Dave, no can do. The discussion is sports related. This
confernece was set up to discuss sports. I can't speak for Frank, but
I won't censor a sports related topic unless it doesn't meet conference
and company policy. I think there is a big difference between a
controversial topic (which this is, judging of events like skating,
diving, gymnastics, etc. has always evoked controversy) and a rathole.
Having said that I will point out that some of the replies have come
dangerously close to the line (and may have even crossed the line)
regarding personal attacks. In my mind it's OK to attack an opposing
viewpoint (try to do it intelligently, though) but it's not OK to
attack the noter holding that viewpoint. It can be a fine line, but we
should all be a little more aware that it exists.
|
155.1236 | happy trials, to you... | CSC32::GAULKE | | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:03 | 13 |
|
Well, ahma gettin' on my horse ann ahma goin' home
Hey, this here table ain't ah movin'!!
|
155.1237 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:04 | 13 |
| �I said that:
�
� - In golf you can repair a ball mark but not a spike mark
� - In baseball balls and strikes are based on where the umpire thinks the
� strike zone is, not where it actually is.
�
� Which one of those is wrong?
I don't recall you making the first statement. Your golf statements
were along the lines of winners are lucky and golfers are scored
against the course and not against each other.
As to the baseball comment, yet it is wrong. Pick up a rule book.
|
155.1238 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:08 | 8 |
| I don't have a problem with the discussion. Mac hit all the relevant points,
and we're not hurting for disk space on the SPORTS disk on CAM any more,
so it's fine with me.
Besides, I enjoy seeing George get so cranked up about stuff....8^)
'Saw
|
155.1239 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:09 | 9 |
| Oh yeah, to me, it's kind of like that scene in "Bull Durham" where Crash
and the umpire get going at it, and Crash calls the ump the one name
that will guarantee him to get tossed (hint: _C_aesar _S_alad).....
So, like in here, you can say just about anything you want, as long as you
don't use that one word, otherwise you get tossed.....
'Saw
|
155.1240 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:15 | 44 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1229 by CSC32::M_MACGREGOR >>>
>Nobody disagrees that there
> isn't a subjective part of this scoring, even you have said so. People
> are disagreeing about whether the scoring is weighted towards the top
> competors, much as the boxing belief that a champion can not lose a
> close fight even if he should.
Well that's not the debate I've been involved it. The claim I've been arguing
against is that skating is fixed and that the judges are in no way influenced
by what they see on the ice.
>Whether or not this is true is up for
> debate, but I think it seems to be true, even if it is not done
> intentionally.
In the 1993 World Championship Oksana Baiul received the highest marks and
won the gold medal. At the time she was 13 years old and had never skated at
the world level before. If what you say is true, it would have taken her a
few losses to "pay her dues".
Conversely, a number of pros went back to the Olympics. I pointed out Katerian
Witt who was a pro who skated last and was "left room" at the top but contrary
to what people claimed they did not give her 6.0's. In fact they gave her lower
marks and she came in somewhere around 7th in spite of being a pro who had paid
her dues and skated last.
>What you are suggesting is
> that because I believe in this I am not knowledgeable about the sport
> (please correct me if I read your response incorrectly)
No that's wrong. It has been my observation that the people who say skating
is not a sport generally don't understand the basic fundamentals. I never
said there was a casual link, this is purely a correlation. Also I didn't make
this claim about people who talk about the subjectiveness of the scoring,
only about the people I've seen who claim that it is not a sport.
> I think both "sides" have made very good points and have ignored what
> the other has said, I suppose this should not surprise me anymore.
Here we agree. I guess I'm still at the surprise stage. Hopefully I'll get
over it.
George
|
155.1242 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:19 | 15 |
| � Well that's not the debate I've been involved it. The claim I've been arguing
�against is that skating is fixed and that the judges are in no way influenced
�by what they see on the ice.
Once again you've made up your own debate by twisting what others have
said.
� Conversely, a number of pros went back to the Olympics. I pointed out Katerian
�Witt who was a pro who skated last and was "left room" at the top but contrary
�to what people claimed they did not give her 6.0's. In fact they gave her lower
�marks and she came in somewhere around 7th in spite of being a pro who had paid
�her dues and skated last.
You're ignoring the backlash of professionalism creeping into a
traditionally amatuer arena.
|
155.1243 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:21 | 7 |
| � So let me get this straight. If a pitcher throws the ball two inches outside
�the real strike zone, the batter doesn't swing, and the umpire calls it a
�strike, it does NOT end up being a strike?
What you have described is a bad call. Trying to relate this
discussion, as you have have in the past, to a judge making a call on
presentation is ridiculous.
|
155.1245 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | FigureSkating,Iditarod,Pro'Rasslin | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:25 | 2 |
|
|
155.1247 | unfair....unfair....unfair..... | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:27 | 18 |
|
>> "..otherwise you get tossed....."
YABBUT HEY!!!!!!!!!!
I thought that was one of the words we're not allowed to use here????
What gives????? A double standard for the mods???????
<insert major grin here>
I remain,
eagle eyed as usual
Kev
|
155.1248 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:31 | 8 |
| You are doing it again, George. I didn't say you twisted the balls and
strikes argument. I said you twisted the argument about the
predetermination of results. And based on your last reply, you still
have it twisted. Nonone has said that the on the ice performances are
not looked at by the judges. What has been said is there are many
preconceived notions as to proper order of finish along with alot of
subjectivity which makes many people (skaters, commentators, diehard
fans, casual fans) question the legitimacy of the judging.
|
155.1249 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:36 | 9 |
|
Yabbut, IMO, MtM just unleashed the babbit-bulldog and it
got George!
I remain,
hearing the "ouch" wayyyyyy over here
Kev
|
155.1250 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:45 | 8 |
| This is actually getting boring, when you come right down to it.
He bites on EVERY single piece of bait you throw out, and bites hard.
I mean, even fish lay off sometimes........
'Saw
|
155.1251 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:50 | 6 |
| yabbut, fish don't get a second chance.
HtH
The Crazy Met
|
155.1252 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:55 | 4 |
| >yabbut, fish don't get a second chance.
They always do on those ESPN fishing shows..... 8^)
|
155.1253 | lots | HBAHBA::HAAS | The karma ran over my dogma | Thu Mar 31 1994 15:56 | 6 |
| Hail, the way I feesh, they get a bunch of chances.
But get me underwater with a spear and they'd better watch out. Of
course, that's a subjective judgement.
TTom
|
155.1255 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 16:04 | 1 |
| @BROKEN_RECORD.COM
|
155.1257 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 16:07 | 19 |
| � No, Tommy has said many times in many places "figure skating is not a sport
�because the results are predetermined".
�
� "Predetermined" means "decided in advance". It leaves no room for any
�interpretation during the event what-so-ever. I believe he went on to say that
�"only by a papal decree" would the order be changed.
Thanks for proving my point, George. You have extrapolated Tommy's
comments far beyond their original meaning.
�I've seen many events where the favorite
�didn't win because they screwed up and I've listed many examples. I've also
�listed examples of where new skaters have beaten old ones.
So what. Exceptions can be found to every rule. A case in point --
your argument that a single elimination tournament is inferior to a
best of X playoff because the best team doesn't always win. Many would
say the Minnesota Twins weren't the best team in baseball in 1987 and
point to their regular season record as proof.
|
155.1259 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 16:21 | 11 |
| > So how am I different from the guys with whom I am debating with regard
>to this?
Well, first off, you think you're debating. Most of the guys are just
coming back at you to get you going again. SPORTS has been that way
for years.
Second, you fall for it every time. Every single time. I mean, even
ACC Chris learned not to take the bait every time....
It's pretty simple really......
|
155.1260 | first Chris, and then Dean? | HBAHBA::HAAS | The karma ran over my dogma | Thu Mar 31 1994 16:24 | 8 |
| >Second, you fall for it every time. Every single time. I mean, even
>ACC Chris learned not to take the bait every time....
Hey, this aint fair. You're not allowed to say anything remotely
complimentary to another noter when they're not here to defend
themselves.
TTom
|
155.1262 | In the Sin Bin.... | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 16:34 | 15 |
| |>Second, you fall for it every time. Every single time. I mean, even
|>ACC Chris learned not to take the bait every time....
|
|Hey, this aint fair. You're not allowed to say anything remotely
|complimentary to another noter when they're not here to defend
|themselves.
I know TTom, but after the most excellent tournament loss and his
failure to appear, I couldn't resist.....
I'll take my two minutes for unSPORTSmanlike conduct.....
'Saw
|
155.1265 | | CAMONE::WAY | It looks good in threes.... | Thu Mar 31 1994 16:54 | 5 |
| > So how is that different?
Prime example right here.
|
155.1267 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:01 | 6 |
| �Overall, however, it is impossible for an upset at the
� Olympic level because the judges have their little agendas and the
� results can be predicted with near pinpoint accuracy.
Tommy, wasn't it George who pointed out that the order of finish in
this Olympics went pretty much according to predictions?
|
155.1269 | | PATE::MACNEAL | ruck `n' roll | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:11 | 2 |
| Actually George, you seem to be the only one having a problem
understanding what Tommy is saying.
|
155.1270 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:12 | 8 |
| re: .1268
what a riot! lucky I didn't have coffee in my hand when I read it. You
should try doing standup comedy. This is probably the first time
Tommy has ever been accused of not saying what is on his mind.
The Crazy Met
|
155.1271 | | PTOVAX::JACOB | I've got to crack this ice and fly | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:15 | 8 |
|
>> So how is that different?
We're laughing our asses off at yer ludicrous statements while you've
probably got a full blown ulcer over this by now.
JaKe
|
155.1272 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Mar 31 1994 17:28 | 18 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1269 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
> Actually George, you seem to be the only one having a problem
> understanding what Tommy is saying.
No, I understand what he's saying. The trick is trying to decipher what he
means when he says it.
Am I correct in assuming that when he says that the scores are predetermined
and that it doesn't matter what happens on the ice he really means the judges
are biased and boost up the score of someone they like at the expense of
someone they don't like?
If so then there is a difference. In the former case there is no way to beat
a favorite. In the last case you can beat the favorite but it is more
difficult.
George
|
155.1273 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Mar 31 1994 18:20 | 6 |
| > Am I correct in assuming that when he says that the scores are predetermined
>and that it doesn't matter what happens on the ice he really means the judges
>are biased and boost up the score of someone they like at the expense of
>someone they don't like?
That's what it seems like to me, and I'd have to say I agree.
|
155.1274 | | CSTEAM::FARLEY | | Fri Apr 08 1994 13:21 | 15 |
|
Yabbut I know yer all just dying to hear abou this!
I believe it's nexted week that the U.S. Winter Olympic Team gets
to go to DC, da White House, and a formal dinner.
The USOC specifically *did not* invite Tonya!!!!! They mumbled
someting about her presence "being disruptive"......
I remain,
stewing this over ;^)
Kev
|
155.1275 | | DZIGN::ROBICHAUD | Richardson > Dean | Fri Apr 08 1994 13:26 | 3 |
| Will Nancy Kerrigan be attending or is this too corny for her?
/Don
|
155.1276 | fixed | HBAHBA::HAAS | The karma ran over my dogma | Fri Apr 08 1994 13:57 | 3 |
| Will the reporters have already made up their minds about this?
TTom
|
155.1277 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Apr 08 1994 14:17 | 4 |
|
I think it's all predetermined by the White House press core.
George
|
155.1278 | | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Fri Apr 08 1994 14:58 | 5 |
| >> <<< Note 155.1275 by DZIGN::ROBICHAUD "Richardson > Dean" >>>
>>
>> Will Nancy Kerrigan be attending or is this too corny for her?
Besides, when you've seen one Mickey Mouse outfit, you've seen 'em all.
|
155.1279 | One good lawsuit deserves another. | AIMHI::KERR | Caught In The Crossfire | Fri Apr 08 1994 15:36 | 5 |
|
And, of course, Tonya and her lawyers will be filling a lawsuit
to overturn the USOC's decision.
|
155.1280 | conspiracy | HBAHBA::HAAS | The karma ran over my dogma | Fri Apr 08 1994 15:40 | 1 |
| Somehow, I get the feeling that Whitewater's involved in all this...
|
155.1281 | | CAPNET::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Product Management | Mon Apr 11 1994 00:19 | 10 |
| <<< Note 155.1277 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
> I think it's all predetermined by the White House press core.
>
> George
The White House press core what?
Mark.
|
155.1282 | | CAMONE::WAY | The Old Man and the PC | Mon Apr 11 1994 09:14 | 3 |
| > The White House press core what?
Apples?
|
155.1283 | The Nancy and Tonya story | CSC32::J_HENSON | Who elected Hillary? | Mon Apr 11 1994 11:34 | 6 |
| And did you see that there's already a TV movie being advertised? I think
it's NBC that's doing it, but wouldn't swear to it. It's supposed to
air next month (I think). I know that Oregon has a Son of Sam law,
but I'll bet that Tonya's getting some sort of cut on this.
Jerry
|
155.1284 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Apr 11 1994 11:55 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1283 by CSC32::J_HENSON "Who elected Hillary?" >>>
> -< The Nancy and Tonya story >-
>I know that Oregon has a Son of Sam law,
>but I'll bet that Tonya's getting some sort of cut on this.
Even if they do have a Son of Sam Law she should still be able to sell her
story. The crime she plead to was some sort of obstruction of justice charge
for lying to the FBI during the investigation. That happened during a 3 day
period between the time she returned from Nationals after the attack and the
time she admitted not telling the truth.
She has not been convicted of any crime covering the period leading up to the
nationals, which includes the attack, or the time after she admitted lying
which includes the Olympics.
So as I understand Son of Sam laws, all she would be prohibited from making
money on would be the part of her story covering those three days.
George
|
155.1285 | | METSNY::francus | Mets in '94 | Mon Apr 11 1994 12:19 | 6 |
| Well the Oregon las is under challenge and even the Attorney General of
Oregon expects the law to be ruled unconstitutional so it really
doesn't matter much.
The Crazy Met
|
155.1286 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Home of the driveby noter... | Thu May 05 1994 17:11 | 41 |
| Subject: Punk Band Invites Harding to Join
Copyright: 1994 by Reuters, R
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 4 May 94 18:40:02 PDT
Expires: Wed, 11 May 94 18:40:02 PDT
ACategory: international
Slugword: CANADA-HARDING
Priority: regular
ANPA: Wc: 256/0; Id: a2268; Src: reut; Sel: reute; Adate: 05-04-N/A
Lines: 29
VANCOUVER (Reuter) - Disgraced American figure skater Tonya
Harding got a shot at a new career as a singer Wednesday when
she was invited to join a punk rock band.
The White Trash Debutantes, which includes a 78-year-old
grandmother and three male cross dressers, said it was
negoatiating with Harding's lawyers on the offer.
``We promised her that we were serious (and) that there was
no mockery being made of her,'' lead singer Ginger Coyote said
in a statement released by the group's publicity agency.
``She is now looking at her career options and the White
Trash Debutantes is one of them.''
The fringe band said it has already written a song for the
skater titled ``Don't Mess with Tonya Harding.''
Lawyers for Harding were not available to comment on the
offer. Harding was forced to end her skating career after she
pleaded guilty in March to covering up the plot to attack rival
Nancy Kerrigan.
Harding is reportedly planning to appear this month on a
television talk show and in March received a $2 million Japanese
offer to become a professional wrestler.
The San Francisco-based Debutantes announced the Harding
offer in Vancouver where they will be performing May 14 as part
of an alternative music festival.
The group said they hoped Harding could join them for the
concert.
Harding was sentenced to three years' probation and legal
sources said it was unlikely she would be allowed to travel to
Canada. Canadian law denies entry to people who have been
convicted of crimes.
|
155.1287 | good, in a way | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Thu May 05 1994 17:36 | 11 |
| > The White Trash Debutantes, which includes a 78-year-old
grandmother and three male cross dressers, said it was
negoatiating with Harding's lawyers on the offer.
I caught these, uh, people the other night on Talk Soup. They coulda been
in the movie Liquid Sky.
This description really doesn't do them justice. The music sucks but they
have a hail of a presentation and stage presence.
TTom
|
155.1288 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Home of the driveby noter... | Thu May 05 1994 17:55 | 2 |
| I miss Talk Soup... sigh..
|
155.1289 | it's still on | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Thu May 05 1994 17:59 | 0 |
155.1290 | | HANNAH::ASHE | Home of the driveby noter... | Thu May 05 1994 18:00 | 3 |
| I lost it when I moved from Burlington to Natick... don't get E!
any more...
|
155.1291 | culture is such a_illusive thang... | HBAHBA::HAAS | Maybe too much Goody's Powder | Thu May 05 1994 18:01 | 0 |
155.1292 | too funny | FRETZ::HEISER | no D in Phoenix | Mon May 09 1994 15:07 | 1 |
| So how do you think Tonya will fare as a punk rocker?
|
155.1293 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 15:28 | 64 |
| <<< Note 204.26 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
If you don't mind, this probably belongs here rather than cluttering up the
year end note.
> What has the IOC done, with regards to "sports", other than
> organize the games every 4 years??? Most of the IOC's history
> generates anything but respect from me. Especially the discriminatory
> rules arround "amateurism" and "professionalism".
Actually I believe that it is the national Olympic committees or it's the
committee for each sport that make the rules on pros and amatures. As far as I
know there has never been a standard rule on this across nations or sports from
the IOC.
For example, in basketball pros can play. In other events, only amatures can
play. Back in the Iron Curtain days in the old eastern block nations,
professionals played. In Western states only amatures could play.
> The rules do a great job of weeding out the poorer performers, but
> when it comes down to selecting a "winner", it is basically a matter of
> opinion on the part of the judges (most of the time...).
More subjective yes, but no sport is truly objective. Runner on 2nd, a shot
into left field. Here comes the runner, here comes the throw. The ball bounces,
the runners slides.
Is the runner safe if he beats the throw or is he safe if in the opinion of
the umpire he beats the throw? Is baseball a sport?
> In other words George, anybody who doesn't agree with you is
> ignorant. Correct???? An interesting debating style, but irrelevant to
> the discussion......
No, I'm not saying that at all. All I'm asking is if there is anyone who
both understands the basic fundamentals of skating who also believes it is
not a sport.
Last time we had this debate I asked if there was anyone who could tell the
difference between a Lutz and a tow loop without looking it up who felt that
figure skating was not a sport. I got no takers. That's about as basic as you
can get.
Imagine of someone who couldn't tell you the difference between a lateral and
a forward pass told you that football was not a sport. It would be the same
as hearing someone who couldn't tell a sit spin from a flying camel telling
you that figure skating was not a sport.
> Explain to me why the judging results so often has followed along
> the lines of the politcal orientation of the judge's home countries,
> i.e. Eastern Blocks judges vs Western judges.
Actually they are not. If you'll notice the judges are usually within a few
points. If it truly were not a sport you'd see someone like Kerrigan getting
5.7's from the west and 3.5's from the east. Instead what you normally see is
skaters getting all scores within about a 0.4 range.
> I like this one. Explain to me why the IOC, whom you so greatly
> respect, consider the Equestrian Events an Olympic "sport"????
You'll notice that it's the riders, not the horses, who get up on the podium
during the medal ceremony.
George
|
155.1294 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:15 | 66 |
|
> Actually I believe that it is the national Olympic committees or it's the
>committee for each sport that make the rules on pros and amatures. As far as I
>know there has never been a standard rule on this across nations or sports from
>the IOC.
That is indeed the current situation George. But not the way it was
oringinally, nor indeed until 1980 or so...
The IOC insisted on amatuer atheletes.
Again, I'll ask the question. What has the IOC done to deserve any
respect? It is only relevant, because you use that as part of your
justification of F.S. as a "sport".
> More subjective yes, but no sport is truly objective. Runner on 2nd, a shot
>into left field. Here comes the runner, here comes the throw. The ball bounces,
>the runners slides.
>
> Is the runner safe if he beats the throw or is he safe if in the opinion of
>the umpire he beats the throw? Is baseball a sport?
Yup, I fully agree there isn't 100% objectivity in any competition.
I guess I see a major difference between an umpire deciding if the ball
od the baserunner got to the bag first, versus an umpire deciding on a
baserunner's "artistic" merits in executing a hookslide. The ump may
(and do) make mistakes in their decisions. But nothing comes down to
how any umpires "feels" about how the baserunner performed.
> Last time we had this debate I asked if there was anyone who could tell the
>difference between a Lutz and a tow loop without looking it up who felt that
>figure skating was not a sport. I got no takers. That's about as basic as you
>can get.
I'll concede that I cannot sit here in my office an describe the
differences between these two moves (BTW, is it a "tow loop" or a
"toe loop"?).
But my objections to Figure Skating has nothing to do with it as an
athletic endeavour, or my personal ability to describe the technical
aspects of any particular figure skating maneuver. It has to do with
how a winner in a competition is determined.
The bottom line is: At the end of any particular Figure Skating
competition do I always feel like the person on performed best on the
ice that particular day won? The answer all to often is no.
Do I think Figure Skaters are athletes? Yes definitely. Both in their
physical conditioning and the level of skill it takes to perform at
the world class level.
Do I enjoy watching Figure Skating? Yes... Even on my summer vaction
in the Adirondacks, we spent a day at the Olympic Skating Venues
watching the practice sessions and went to the weekly the Saturday Night
performance.
Do I consider it a sport? No!
JimH
|
155.1295 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:38 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 204.27 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>
>I've never been able to recognize figure skating as a sport... if you lined
>up a panel of judges at the ballet, you'd have the same thing. Both take a
>great deal of athleticism, but there just isn't any intrinsic competition --
>it's all contrived.
If it were as subjective or "contrived" as people say, why did all of the
favorites, Viktor Petrenko, Brian Boitano, Kurt Browning and Katterina Witt,
whom the judges had all rewarded with medals previously, get shut out of the
medals in last winter's Olympics?
People who believe in figure skating as a sport point to the mandatory
deductions due to required elements that they failed or left out of their short
program and/or lack of content in their long program. What theory do those
who do not believe in figure skating as a sport advance as the reason those
previous stars got shut out in Lillihamer?
George
|
155.1296 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:41 | 9 |
|
nit: Witt was not considered a favorite for a medal.
Notice also that all the atheletes you mentioned had turned pro and then
come back with amateur status (whatever the heck that is!). I would not at
all be surprised if the judges were biased against those who came back
after turning pro.
The Crazy Met
|
155.1297 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Tue Jan 03 1995 16:59 | 37 |
|
> If it were as subjective or "contrived" as people say
I have yet to see anybody use the word "contrived" up until
your note. Subjective != contrived
> People who believe in figure skating as a sport point to the mandatory
>deductions due to required elements that they failed or left out of their short
>program and/or lack of content in their long program. What theory do those
>who do not believe in figure skating as a sport advance as the reason those
>previous stars got shut out in Lillihamer?
I don't recall any of the skaters you mentioned as being considered
favorites going into the 94 Olympics. And as somebody pointed out,
there were many hints floating about the judges being biased against
professional skaters. I remember Torvill and Deane being especially
disappointed in how their performance was scored by the judges. (And
there was the controversey about their over the back flip, that was
ruled a lift)
And as I pointed out (or tried to) in an earlier note, the Figure
Skating scoring systems does a good job of eliminating skaters who have
poor performances. As you point out there are mandatory deductions for
failing to hit elements. Where the system falls completely apart is
when two skaters both turn in excellent technical performances. The
winner is such a case is often based on artistic merits.
Figure Skateing is as much a "sport" as the Miss America pagent.
JimH
|
155.1298 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 17:00 | 63 |
| <<< Note 155.1294 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> The IOC insisted on amatuer atheletes.
As I recall there was a guy who was the head of the U.S. National Olympic
committee named something like Avery Brundage who was the one most responsible
of the United States being limited to amatures up until the 1980 time frame.
He and others like him believed very strongly (rightly or not) in amatuer
sports and fought against any attempt to have pros qualified for the U.S.
Olympic team. And since the U.S. amatures did fairly well, no one seemed to
mind.
Then in the 80's, Brundage left and the Russian pros started beating the U.S.
college kids at basketball and things started to change.
In any case, the IOC may have frowned on pros from the west but they never
had to disallow our pros because we never sent them.
> Again, I'll ask the question. What has the IOC done to deserve any
> respect? It is only relevant, because you use that as part of your
> justification of F.S. as a "sport".
The Olympics is the greatest sporting event in the world. Every time it's
on, winter or summer, I stayed glued to my seat for the entire 2 weeks. Now
that may be happening in spite of the organization responsible for running
the Olympics but I doubt it. Their results earn them my respect.
>The ump may
> (and do) make mistakes in their decisions. But nothing comes down to
> how any umpires "feels" about how the baserunner performed.
Yes it's subjective but that doesn't mean that it's contrived or without
any guidelines or form. The skaters all know what the judges are looking
for and they all add those elements into their programs and practice them
to death.
If it were as non-structred as you claim, no one would have any idea what
to do in their program.
By the way, during one of the NFL games this weekend, I forget which one, the
announcers were saying that one of the coaches went over all of the referees
during a player meeting to make his team aware of the idiosyncrasies of each
ref and what they would likely be looking for during the game.
Now if football is so objective, why would he waste his time with an exercise
of that sort?
> I'll concede that I cannot sit here in my office an describe the
> differences between these two moves (BTW, is it a "tow loop" or a
> "toe loop"?).
Fine, you win the spell'en bee. But if you don't understand the basic
fundamentals, then how do you know that the contestants don't understand the
basic structure of what is to be presented and what the judges are looking for?
And as I'm sure you know, presentation is only half the mark. In the
technical part of the score they are actually counting things like jumps,
spins, and foot work. The reason Brian Boitano didn't win a metal during
the last Olympics was because he missed a mandatory triple axel during the
short program, not because some judge felt like giving him a bad score.
George
|
155.1299 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Tue Jan 03 1995 17:08 | 4 |
| Actually I believe that Boitano was considered a favorite for a medal,
but not to the same degree as in 1992.
The Crazy Met
|
155.1300 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 17:11 | 23 |
| <<< Note 204.29 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>
>I mean, there rarely is a dispute in basketball whether or not the ball went
>through the hoop, but in skating when one judge gives a 8.2 and another a 9.4
>it really makes me wonder what the hail I'm watching.
Well if you are seeing scores like 8.2 and 9.4 I wonder what you are watching
as well since they use a system that goes from 0.0 to 6.0.
Once again if someone came up to you and said football is not a sport
because they give the team 9 points for a touchdown would you figure the guy
knew what he was talking about? Everyone who claims figure skating is not a
sport has the same lack of knowledge to even the simplest and most basic
fundamentals of the event.
You can't possibly know how those scores are calculated if you don't know
the fundamentals of the sport. The athletes do know where those numbers come
from and they spend 6 hours a day practicing their butts off so that they
can do the things that earn them those points.
If it were without structure, why would they spend all that time practicing?
George
|
155.1301 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 17:14 | 11 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1296 by METSNY::francus "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>
>Notice also that all the atheletes you mentioned had turned pro and then
>come back with amateur status (whatever the heck that is!). I would not at
>all be surprised if the judges were biased against those who came back
>after turning pro.
Viktor Petrenko did not turn pro between winning the Olympic gold medal
in 1992 and getting beat in the Olympics in 1994.
George
|
155.1302 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Tue Jan 03 1995 17:22 | 39 |
| RE<<< Note 155.1297 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> > If it were as subjective or "contrived" as people say
>
> I have yet to see anybody use the word "contrived" up until
> your note. Subjective != contrived
See 204.27 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG
> I don't recall any of the skaters you mentioned as being considered
> favorites going into the 94 Olympics. And as somebody pointed out,
> there were many hints floating about the judges being biased against
> professional skaters.
Viktor Petrenko was a favorite who had not turned pro.
But in any case, anyone who watched the events could clearly see the mistakes
that the others made during the short program that lead to their mandatory
deductions. Unless, of course, you don't understand what you are watching.
Think about what you guy are saying.
- The short program in the men's program has a triple axel as a required
element.
- Each required element missed results in a 0.5 mandatory deduction.
- Brian Boitano missed the triple axel in his short program and landed
on his butt.
- Brian Boitano's score from all the judges was about 0.5 below what
was expected
THEREFOR
Brian Boitano was given a low score because he was a pro that returned
to the Olympics.
George
|
155.1303 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Tue Jan 03 1995 17:39 | 90 |
|
> As I recall there was a guy who was the head of the U.S. National Olympic
>committee named something like Avery Brundage who was the one most responsible
>of the United States being limited to amatures up until the 1980 time frame.
Avery Brundage was the Head (president, whatever) of the IOC!!!!!!
And yes you are correct, he is the person mostly responsible to
clutching fiercely to the amatuer only rules for so long....
> The Olympics is the greatest sporting event in the world. Every time it's
>on, winter or summer, I stayed glued to my seat for the entire 2 weeks. Now
>that may be happening in spite of the organization responsible for running
>the Olympics but I doubt it. Their results earn them my respect.
So that makes them great at Large Event logistics, Marketing, and
T.V. contract negotiating. It doesn't make them experts are deciding
what is or isn't a sport.
> Yes it's subjective but that doesn't mean that it's contrived or without
>any guidelines or form. The skaters all know what the judges are looking
>for and they all add those elements into their programs and practice them
>to death.
Again, I NEVER said I thought the judging results were 'contrived',
just subjective. Yes there is structure and there are guidelines. And
it is very clear what the judges are looking for in terms of technical
elements, and what will be deducted for mistakes and omissions.
> If it were as non-structred as you claim, no one would have any idea what
>to do in their program.
Where did I say it was 'unstructured'? I seem to be completely
missing my point.
I've already concede that no sport is 100% objective. A football
referee has to make 'judgement' calls, just like the baseball ump. But
the tend to be of the 'was his foot inbounds?' type call. Not "He only
gets 5.8 points for that TD, because he wasn't graceful as he crossed the
goal line" type of 'judgement'. BTW, I think the NFL blew it big time
with its handling of instant replay. Rather than fixing the problems
with the system, they tooka major step backwards, and got rid of it.
Football players rarely (note: not never...) walk off the field and
blame their loss on an official. Even if there was a controversial
decsion late in a game, typically the reaction is we never should have
been a position to have a bad call effect the game.
But at the end of Figure Skating (or Boxing, Gymnastics, or any
other judged competition) competitions there are frequently questions the final
scores by the participants and their coaches.
Take the Baiul/Kerrigan fiasco. No matter who had won the Gold in
that competition, there was going to be questions about why one was
better than the other. Several judges had the two skaters tied overall,
but Baiul got the higher ordinal from those judges (or from more of
them) based on higher artistic marks.
I understand those are the rules of the competition. The Skaters
have to live with it, and that's fine. But in my mind, it is that
completely subjectivedecsion making process, where skater A and skater
B have turned in essentially equal technical performances, but skater B
wins because she 'pleased' me more, that separates judged competitions
from 'true' sports.
JimH
>>(BTW, is it a "tow loop" or a "toe loop"?).
>Fine, you win the spell'en bee
Oops, sorry George, that wasn't meant to be a jab at you. I really
didn't know....
|
155.1304 | | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Tue Jan 03 1995 17:42 | 21 |
|
> Well if you are seeing scores like 8.2 and 9.4 I wonder what you are watching
>as well since they use a system that goes from 0.0 to 6.0.
Ok, my example was bad for skating, maybe good for gymnastics? It doesn't
matter. My point is, how can a number of supposed expert judges come up with
large variations in scoring if it isn't subjective to some degree? And, yes,
a basketball official makes subjective decisions too, but they are a small
piece of the game, not the *whole* thing. Thousands play basketball every day
with no officials! Is it possible for 2 figure skaters to do the same? I don't
know. You are right -- I don't know much about the fundamentals of figure
skating. Yet, I know even less about cricket and jai alai, but somehow know
that they are sports.
Re: Contrived. That was the word I used to describe the competition, NOT
the scoring. Figure skating appears (to me) to be an art form that was
contrived to be a competition. Anything can be made into a competition, but
a sport has competition as its heart and soul. Why do figure skaters wear
make-up and pretty clothes? What does that have to do with sport?
Greg
|
155.1305 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 09:42 | 34 |
| <<< Note 155.1303 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> Avery Brundage was the Head (president, whatever) of the IOC!!!!!!
Well at one time he was a U.S. official but the point still remains, it
was officials from the U.S. that pushed the amateur status, no one forced it
on us and now it seems to be getting phased out.
> Again, I NEVER said I thought the judging results were 'contrived',
> just subjective.
So why does that alone mean that figure skating is not a sport?
Sports to me involves a lot more than the final score. It involves planning,
preparation, training, communication between player and coach, there is a
physical aspect, a mental aspect, and there is the competition itself as
athletes go out and try to put forth their best.
Officiating involves more than the final score as well it involves conducting
the event in an orderly fashion, keeping conditions fair for the competitors,
calling fouls, and seeing that the score is recorded in a fair and impartial
manor. And yes sports involves the method in which the score is calculated
which in figure skating involves both a subjective and an objective component
and the determination as to who won.
When you look at that list the only difference between figure skating and any
other sport is that one part of the calculation of the score is subjective
according to methods that are well understood by the coaches, competitors and
judges. And because of that alone figure skating is not a sport?
Well maybe not to you but it is to me and so far it is to everyone else with
whom I've spoken who understands the basic fundamentals of the sport.
George
|
155.1306 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 09:55 | 26 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1304 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>
>Ok, my example was bad for skating, maybe good for gymnastics? It doesn't
>matter. My point is, how can a number of supposed expert judges come up with
>large variations in scoring if it isn't subjective to some degree?
No one is saying that the score is not subjective but the the point is that
they don't have large variations. The scores are almost always within a rather
small range for any given competitor.
In a typical competition scores for figure skaters will vary from the 2.8
range to up around 5.9 but if you'll notice the individual judges that score
any one competitor are almost always within a 0.5 range of each other and most
scores are usually within a 0.2 to 0.3 range of each other. That's hardly a
large variation when the difference between the top and bottom skaters can be
as much as 3.0 and sometimes more.
>Thousands play basketball every day
>with no officials! Is it possible for 2 figure skaters to do the same?
Millions of people skate for sport every day without a judge in sight. As I
said in my previous note, there is lot more to a sport than just figuring out
who won and who lost. At that level it's more the exercise and fun of playing
the game that counts.
George
|
155.1307 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 10:05 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 204.33 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
Pardon me for moving your note but it probably belongs here.
> That has almost never been the case. Wasn't this the first Olympics
> (as well as the last) that professionals had been allowed to regain amateur
> status to skate in the Olympics ? Where was the world's best female
> figure skater ? Not at the Olympics, I can assure you.
Even so, with Olympic figure skating the top 6 competitors in the final round
are probably 6 of the top 12 athletes in the sport in terms of capability and
probably the top 6 in terms of preparation. Pro figure skaters tend to let
themselves go.
By contrast, if you take the final game of the final four you are hardly
talking about 2 of the best 4 teams in basketball. There are probably 25+ teams
in the NBA that could blow the NCAA champion away by a good 20 points every
time they played.
George
|
155.1308 | | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Wed Jan 04 1995 10:10 | 23 |
|
> Millions of people skate for sport every day without a judge in sight.
I would say: 'Millions of people skate for fun and recreation every day...'
___________________
>As I
>said in my previous note, there is lot more to a sport than just figuring out
>who won and who lost. At that level it's more the exercise and fun of playing
>the game that counts.
^^^^
I would argue that 'the game' at least implies, if not requires, competition.
The 'competition' of figure skating is comparing two artists outstanding
athletic abilities and ability to perform under pressure. But 'skating' is not
inherently a game, it is contrived to be a game for the sake of drawing
audiences at the Olympics and other events.
I'm done. ;)
All in fun,
Greg
|
155.1309 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 10:28 | 20 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1308 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>
>But 'skating' is not
>inherently a game, it is contrived to be a game for the sake of drawing
>audiences at the Olympics and other events.
There are thousands of people in the united states and 10's of thousands
around the world who skate in competitions throughout the year. With the
exception of the top 10-20 skaters, these competitions have nothing to do with
drawing in audiences, they are skating simply to try to do the best that they
can at at a sport they like.
Yes some of those skaters have the slim chance of making the top as a goal
but the majority just skate for the sport, even in competition.
And no one would ever accuse those individuals who dedicate themselves to
competitive roller skating of doing it for the sake of drawing audiences
because they don't.
George
|
155.1310 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Wed Jan 04 1995 11:27 | 47 |
|
>> Avery Brundage was the Head (president, whatever) of the IOC!!!!!!
>
> Well at one time he was a U.S. official but the point still remains, it
>was officials from the U.S. that pushed the amateur status, no one forced it
>on us and now it seems to be getting phased out.
Not true. It was the IOC that forced the only amatuer rule for years
at the Olympic games. It has only been since the about 1980 that the
IOC has left the decsion to the individual sports' ruling bodies
> When you look at that list the only difference between figure skating and any
>other sport is that one part of the calculation of the score is subjective
>according to methods that are well understood by the coaches, competitors and
>judges. And because of that alone figure skating is not a sport?
Yes, that is exactly my point of view. The same goes for Gymnastics,
High Diving, Rythmic Dancing, Synchronized Swimming....
> Well maybe not to you but it is to me and so far it is to everyone else with
>whom I've spoken who understands the basic fundamentals of the sport.
This isn't true not matter how many times you repeat. I understand
the basic fundamentals of the sport, despite the fact I can't describe
what a 'Lutz' is right now. When watching a Figure Skating performance,
which I have been doing for years, I can tell when a particular move
has been done well or not.
We've talked a lot about the technical aspects of Figure Skating:
required elements, mandatory deductions, etc...
You seem to be completely avoiding the issue of the completely
subjective category of "Artistic Impression", which in many
competitions separates the medal winners.
Do you care to comment on that George? Or will you just keep on
repeating the "...everybody who understands the fundamentals of the
sport (sic) agrees with me" chant???
JimH
|
155.1311 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 12:59 | 33 |
| RE<<< Note 155.1310 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> You seem to be completely avoiding the issue of the completely
> subjective category of "Artistic Impression", which in many
> competitions separates the medal winners.
I haven't avoided it at all.
Artistic Impression is a subjective evaluation made by the judges. It is made
according to subjective standards that all the coaches and skaters understand,
plan for, practice, and work hard to execute.
It includes such things as depth of edges, body position, synchronization
of moves to music and other things that are not all that difficult to
understand.
Look, it's this simple. Assuming that I am graphing the top and bottom half
of a skater, which one of these skaters is holding better form?
\ |
A \ B \
Assuming a skater is going around a corner, which one has the deeper edge?
\ |
A \ B |
My subjective evaluation is that A has better form and a deeper edge so A
gets a better score for artistic impression.
To a judge who is skilled at evaluating skaters it's about that simple.
George
|
155.1312 | | MKFSA::LONG | Steelers...strivin' fer 5! | Wed Jan 04 1995 13:15 | 1 |
| Thank goodness for the NEXT UNSEEN key!
|
155.1313 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Wed Jan 04 1995 13:24 | 37 |
|
> Artistic Impression is a subjective evaluation made by the judges. It is made
>according to subjective standards ...
"subjective standard"????
From my dictionary...
subjective - preceeding from or taking place within an individual's
mind.
standard - An acknowledged measure of comparison for quantitative
or qualitive value; criterion; norm;
In other words, each individual judges decides in his/her mind what the
standard is for excellence in "artistic impression".
> ....that all the coaches and skaters understand,
> plan for, practice, and work hard to execute.
So you are saying that all the coaches and skaters are mind
readers!!!! Because that's the only way they know how to please the
judges when it comes to scoring the artistic marks.
And you claim everybody knows exactly what they have to do a head
of time in order to win the competetion? Baloney, all they know is what
they can't do, technically, in order not be eliminated via mandatory
deductions. When it comes down to "who wins", it is often a matter of
opinion on the part of the judges.
JimH
|
155.1314 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 13:32 | 25 |
| RE<<< Note 155.1313 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> So you are saying that all the coaches and skaters are mind
> readers!!!! Because that's the only way they know how to please the
> judges when it comes to scoring the artistic marks.
No I didn't say that at all. I said that artistic impression is based on
things like deep edges, body form, synchronization of moves to music, etc.
There's no mind reading involved. You either land your jump on rhythm or
you do not. You either keep your leg straight or you bend it.
It is a subjective evaluation of how you do those things but that does
not mean it is based on mind reading.
RE Subjective evaluations
Ever take essay tests that were marked subjectively?
Would you say those were not real tests because they were subjective?
Do you feel that it is not real education when one kids gets an 87 and
another gets a 92 for their response to a question on the motives that lead the
Pilgrims to immigrate to the new world?
George
|
155.1315 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Wed Jan 04 1995 13:36 | 13 |
|
>Ever take essay tests that were marked subjectively?
>
>Would you say those were not real tests because they were subjective?
No, I just wouldn't try to pass it off as "Sport"
JimH
|
155.1316 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 13:47 | 14 |
| Here we go I just looked up "sport" in my standard DEC issue American
Heritage Dictionary.
SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
athletics or hunting. 4. Light mockery. 4. One known for the manner of his
acceptance of rules or a difficult situation. 5. One who lives a gay,
extravagant life 6. Amorous dalliance; lovemaking. v. 1 To play; frolic.
2. To joke or trifle. 3 To display or show off adj. Of, relating to, or
appropriate for sports [from Middle English "sporten", to amuse, divert]
Ok, where in there does it say that if an activity has a subjective scoring
system it is not a sport?
George
|
155.1317 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Wed Jan 04 1995 14:13 | 5 |
|
You claim hunting is not a sport and then post that? That's
rich George!
Claybone
|
155.1318 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 14:31 | 30 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1317 by GENRAL::WADE "Ah'm Yo Huckleberry..." >>>
> You claim hunting is not a sport and then post that? That's
> rich George!
Hey, I'm honest. I found some information and I posted it regardless if
contradicted a minor point in my skating argument or not.
So ok, I'm willing to admit I'm wrong and hunting is a sport. Now I'm
ready for the long line of crow eaters to line up and admit that skating is
a sport.
Here it is right in definitions 1 and 2:
SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
athletics or hunting. ...
Figure skating is an active pastime, it's a diversion, and it involves
athletics. Hey, it even involves hunting, remember how the thug that wacked
Kerrigan stalked her around the Country for 3 weeks?
And NO-where in there does it say that something is not a sport if the
scoring system is subjective. In fact, there doesn't have to be a scoring
system at all for it to be a sport.
But hey, I'm willing to accept alternate definitions. Anyone got another
dictionary to back up the point that if an activity has subjective scoring
it is not a sport?
George
|
155.1319 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Wed Jan 04 1995 15:06 | 19 |
|
Good one, George! I read that defintition of "sport" several days
ago, and chose to ignore it! :-)
Just about anything we do fits that definition of "sport",
including Noting, Tiddlewinks, Chess, and even Nose-picking!!
So yes, by that definition, I'm willing admit Figure Skating is a
sport....
JimH
Excuse me now, while I go particpate in the active pastime, oops sport
of Navel Contemplation... :-)
|
155.1320 | Webster drops the ball... | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Wed Jan 04 1995 15:46 | 12 |
|
Re: Eating crow
I'll take it when I deserve it, but this time I'll just refer you to
note 204.27 where I ducked the dictionary definition at the very start
of this LDUC.
BTW, I'm still wondering why figure skaters wear make-up and fancy clothes.
While it is prevelant in many art forms, I can't think of a single sport
where make-up and ruffles are standard equipment.
Greg
|
155.1321 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Wed Jan 04 1995 15:53 | 9 |
| >BTW, I'm still wondering why figure skaters wear make-up and fancy clothes.
>While it is prevelant in many art forms, I can't think of a single sport
>where make-up and ruffles are standard equipment.
Football and baseball. Ever see the anti-glare makeup that ball
players wear? Most uniforms are designed less for functionality and
more for show.
Mark (not a skating fan, but you're wrong on this one)
|
155.1322 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 16:00 | 16 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1320 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>
>I'll take it when I deserve it, but this time I'll just refer you to
>note 204.27 where I ducked the dictionary definition at the very start
>of this LDUC.
Ok, so what you are saying is that if you ignore any and all existing
definitions of the word SPORT including it's word origin from middle
English then it means what ever you want it to mean.
Seems the Cheshire Cat made that point to Alice at one time. Perhaps we
could say that the "Figure Skating is not a Sport" claim is a Cheshire
argument.
-_-
George
|
155.1323 | | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Wed Jan 04 1995 16:32 | 18 |
| > Football and baseball. Ever see the anti-glare makeup that ball
> players wear? Most uniforms are designed less for functionality and
> more for show.
>
> Mark (not a skating fan, but you're wrong on this one)
Bull sh!t on both counts.
The anti-glare make-up has a functional purpose. Mascara, eyeliner and
blush don't help the figure skater skate any better. It's different.
Uniforms are first functional, then showy. Although I'll admit that the
NFL was on the leading edge of the trendy shoulder pad fashion thing.
Next the Yankees will be wearing cotton poofy shirts...
And lastly, by the dictionary, my Dad's favorite sport is landscaping his
back yard. Is that the definition of 'sport' most people use? C'mon.
|
155.1324 | | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625 | Wed Jan 04 1995 16:43 | 10 |
|
RE: previous replies
So you can put this one to rest........
CANDLEPIN BOWLING is indeed a sport, based on the prior.
Thanks....case closed!!
RTG
|
155.1325 | Wierd sport, fersure | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Testudo is still grounded! | Wed Jan 04 1995 16:54 | 7 |
| What, candlepin bowlers wear makeup, costumes, and are judged on
"artistic merit"?
Guess I need to read my Sprots Illustrated a little closer when the Top
10 Candlepin Bowler rankings come out.:-)
UMDan
|
155.1326 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 17:05 | 24 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1323 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>
>Uniforms are first functional, then showy. Although I'll admit that the
>NFL was on the leading edge of the trendy shoulder pad fashion thing.
>Next the Yankees will be wearing cotton poofy shirts...
If uniforms were just functional guys would play in sweat pants and colored
tee shirts. What's the point of pin stripes? Nothing, they are as cosmetic as
eye liner. What was the point of Charlie Finley's ... what was the point of
Charlie Finley? Fluorescent green uniforms and yellow shoes? What's that?
>And lastly, by the dictionary, my Dad's favorite sport is landscaping his
>back yard. Is that the definition of 'sport' most people use? C'mon.
The definition that applies to the sports in this file is the one in #2 below
that talks about athletics or hunting.
SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
athletics or hunting. ...
That would clearly include NCAA basketball and figure skating but would not
include your dad's landscaping hobby.
George
|
155.1327 | The World Gardening Championships, live on ESPN!!!! :-) | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Wed Jan 04 1995 17:14 | 18 |
|
>So you can put this one to rest........
>
>CANDLEPIN BOWLING is indeed a sport, based on the prior.
>
>Thanks....case closed!!
There was never any doubt!!! :-)
JimH
P.S. Gardening/Landscaping isn't a "specific diversion"? Sure it
is!!!!
|
155.1328 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Wed Jan 04 1995 17:32 | 21 |
| RE<<< Note 155.1327 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> P.S. Gardening/Landscaping isn't a "specific diversion"? Sure it
> is!!!!
Read more carefully:
SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
athletics or hunting. ...
Notice it says "as athletics or hunting" in that definition.
If you take ALL of definition 2, not just a few words clipped out of context,
it clearly includes things like NCAA basketball, duck hunting, and figure
skating but not landscaping.
At any rate, I'm still waiting for anyone to come up with a formal definition
from anywhere that shows sports excluding events when scoring is subjective.
George
|
155.1329 | OH KING HAL! | SPIKED::SWEENEY | Tom Sweeney in OGO | Wed Jan 04 1995 17:49 | 10 |
| Save us!
Is SKATING a sport or not? Maybe if you make a ruling,
your subjects will stop all this mindless bickering.
Please help us Hal! My next unseen finger is sprained,
and I'm afraid of what finger I'll have to us for the next
skating note!
zamboni
|
155.1330 | | METSNY::francus | There is no joy in Mudville | Wed Jan 04 1995 17:53 | 6 |
| re: .1329
I've never seen a discussion sink to such depths that Hal had to be called on
to arbitrate. A sad sad day in ::sprots.
The Crazy Met
|
155.1331 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Wed Jan 04 1995 18:08 | 17 |
|
>SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
>athletics or hunting. ...
>
>Notice it says "as athletics or hunting" in that definition.
Oh come on George, you mean to tell me that you don't recognize the
phrase "as athletics or hunting" to mean "here are a couple of examples
of specific diversions". It's not meant to be a complete list. Let's
not get completely silly about this.... (oops, too late isn't it!!!)
JimH
|
155.1332 | I'll be rollin the little ball tonight | MSBCS::GALVIN | R.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625 | Thu Jan 05 1995 08:39 | 13 |
|
> Guess I need to read my Sprots Illustrated a little closer when the Top
> 10 Candlepin Bowler rankings come out.:-)
> UMDan
Dan, Believe it or not, there was one story in Sprots Illustrated last
year related to candlepin bowling. It wasn't a top 10, but it was a
tribute to Stacia Czernicki, arguably the best candlepin bowler of all
time (may she R.I.P.)
RTG
|
155.1333 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jan 05 1995 09:24 | 19 |
| RE<<< Note 155.1331 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> Oh come on George, you mean to tell me that you don't recognize the
> phrase "as athletics or hunting" to mean "here are a couple of examples
> of specific diversions". It's not meant to be a complete list. Let's
> not get completely silly about this.... (oops, too late isn't it!!!)
Yes they are examples but as with most dictionary definitions they are
meant to give you a flavor of what they mean by "specific". They are saying
that the 2nd definition of the word "sport" refers to a particular class of
diversions including things like athletics and hunting as apposed to the
1st definition that can mean any diversion (i.e. landscaping).
In any case, the reason I'm arguing this is that people are always saying
that figure skating is not a sport because one aspect of the scoring is
subjective. My point is that there doesn't seem to be any formal definition
of the word "sport" that backs up this point.
George
|
155.1334 | One of our more pointless LDUCs | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Thu Jan 05 1995 09:45 | 32 |
| Arguing over definitions almost always generates more heat than light,
and this thread is no exception.
From .1294:
> The bottom line is: At the end of any particular Figure Skating
> competition do I always feel like the person on performed best on the
> ice that particular day won? The answer all to often is no.
Regrettably, those of us who watch figure skating all too often have
the same experience. I was a part of what I gather is an American
minority that thought Oksana Baiul deserved to win the gold, but I
was uneasy that almost all of the Eastern judges agreed with me and
almost all of the Western judges did not.
In passing, I remark that the citation from JimH's .1294 applies
equally well to boxing, be it amateur or professional.
I agree with JimH that deciding a competition by the opinion of judges
is unsatisfactory. I even agree a bit with Greg that there is an
element of contrivance in putting together a competition between
practitioners of figure skating, gymnastics, or rock-and-roll dancing.
But the bottom line for me is, do I enjoy watching it? If I do, I'm
not going to split hairs to decided if it's a sport or not. I'm just
going to watch.
I have to say I couldn't suppress a chuckle when they announced
individual synchronized swimming as an Olympic sport. With what
is the individual synchronized???
Steve
|
155.1335 | | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Thu Jan 05 1995 11:43 | 11 |
| <<< Note 155.1322 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
> Ok, so what you are saying is that if you ignore any and all existing
>definitions of the word SPORT including it's word origin from middle
>English then it means what ever you want it to mean.
Which is *precisely* that same thing you did when Clay called you to
the carpet on "hunting" being included in the dictionary definition of
"sport".
Mark.
|
155.1336 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:26 | 19 |
| RE <<< Note 155.1335 by PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing" >>>
> Which is *precisely* that same thing you did when Clay called you to
> the carpet on "hunting" being included in the dictionary definition of
> "sport".
Right, now keep doing your homework Mark and see what happened next.
First I entered that definition even though it negated a point I had made
earlier about hunting.
Second, I was man enough to admit that I was wrong and that hunting clearly
is a sport.
Now I'm still waiting for someone to have the stones to say "I was wrong,
figure skating is clearly a sport" without embellishing it with a lot of face
saving nonsense.
George
|
155.1337 | | GENRAL::WADE | Ah'm Yo Huckleberry... | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:29 | 5 |
|
But George, if they admitted that, we would be deprived of
your *thought provoking* notes. ;^)
Claybone
|
155.1338 | And the many thought provoking replies | MUNDIS::SSHERMAN | Steve Sherman @MFR | Thu Jan 05 1995 13:40 | 1 |
|
|
155.1339 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:35 | 36 |
|
> Now I'm still waiting for someone to have the stones to say "I was wrong,
>figure skating is clearly a sport" without embellishing it with a lot of face
>saving nonsense.
George, you simply found a 'definition' of "sport" that was so
all-encompassing that it included Figure Skating. Then you changed your
fundemental concept of what is a sport (i.e. hunting wasn't a sport
earlier this week, today hunting is a sport. What changed other than
you looked up 'sport' in your dictionary).
What we are coming down to is, defining what is a "sport" is an
individual subjective opinion. About as easy to a grasp on as how much
does a Figure Skater need to arch her back in order to aesthetically
please a judge.
I've already admitted that figure skating met the criteria of being
a "specific diversion", or an "active pastime". But neither you nor I
had that concept of sport in mind earlier this week.
My idea of true "sport" is an atheltic competition in which the
winner is determined through objective criteria - runs scored, pins
down, stokes, time elapsed, distance thrown, etc...
Yours apparently includes contests in which subjective criteria is
also allowed: Figure Skating, Gymnastics, Rythmic Dancing, etc...
I can live with that, even though I disagree...
JimH
|
155.1340 | | TORREY::MAY_BR | Clinton happens | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:40 | 7 |
| Figure skating is as much a sport as synchronized swimming. Can we
just leave it at that and cease this discussion.
brews
|
155.1341 | Re: .1339 & .1340 | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:47 | 2 |
|
What they said.
|
155.1342 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Thu Jan 05 1995 14:49 | 26 |
| RE<<< Note 155.1339 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
> I've already admitted that figure skating met the criteria of being
> a "specific diversion", or an "active pastime". But neither you nor I
> had that concept of sport in mind earlier this week.
Here's where we disagree. Let me ask you this question. What do you see
as the difference between definitions 1 and 2?
SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
athletics or hunting.
You seem to be saying that by "specific diversion" they mean any diversion.
If that's true, then how is definition 2 any different from definition 1?
I believe that definition 1 means using the word sport in it's original
middle English sense of any diversion and in definition 2 they are using
"athletics" and "hunting" to point out the more modern definition of the
word "sport" which is a reference to either the activity of outdoors type
sportsmen such as hunters and fishermen or athletic types of sport.
If definition 2 is not pointing toward the modern definition that you speak
of, why is it there at all? What purpose is definition 2 if it's nothing more
than a repeat of definition 1?
George
|
155.1343 | | MIMS::ROLLINS_R | | Thu Jan 05 1995 17:38 | 22 |
| ><<< Note 155.1339 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
>
>
> My idea of true "sport" is an atheltic competition in which the
> winner is determined through objective criteria - runs scored, pins
> down, stokes, time elapsed, distance thrown, etc...
>
> JimH
Just curious, does your idea of a true sport then include American
Gladiators and professional wrestling ? How about hunting and fishing ?
Would fishing be a sport only if in a tournament, or would me going out
fishing on my own count ? Would deep sea fishing (presumable more
"athletic" than smelting, for example) be more of a sport than other
types of fishing ? How will Newt and the Republicans deal with these
issues ?
Sorry, getting carries away there, but I am curious about the answer
to this first question.
Rick Rollins
|
155.1344 | | TOOK::HALPIN | Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995! | Fri Jan 06 1995 09:52 | 14 |
|
> Just curious, does your idea of a true sport then include American
> Gladiators and professional wrestling ?
No. I already stated that earlier this week. Staged performances,
such as these, in the guise of a sporting event. It is pure
theatre/entertainment. These things aren't even a true competition.
JimH
|
155.1345 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jan 06 1995 10:37 | 12 |
| The word competition is not part of the definition of the word sport.
Perhaps that's the reason for the phrase "competitive sports" to
differentiate sports like basketball and skating where they keep score to
sports like jogging and fishing where they do not.
Anyway, someone earlier asked about skaters and makeup and suggested that no
other sport is into cosmetics. I guess that makes me wonder about Denis Rodman.
I understand he recently went from green hair to orange hair. Does that mean
that basketball is not a sport?
George
|
155.1346 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jan 06 1995 13:06 | 11 |
| RE Note 206.21 FXTROT::ALLEMANG
>Never mind... it had nothing to do with the great figure skating debate of
>'95. I like KW... her (art) form is beautiful to behold. Nice thumbs too.
Ok so you made a mistake and put it there rather than here. No problem
So if athletes don't have a number, then it's not a sport? Are you saying
that tennis and golf are not sports?
George
|
155.1347 | Good morning? | PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE | PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing | Fri Jan 06 1995 13:12 | 4 |
| George, the loud whooshing is the sound of Allemang's note going over
your head.
Mark.
|
155.1348 | | FXTROT::ALLEMANG | | Fri Jan 06 1995 13:13 | 5 |
|
George,
What part of 'it had nothing to do with the great figure skating debate of
'95' don't you understand?!?!?
|
155.1349 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Fri Jan 06 1995 13:24 | 5 |
| Let's just say I'm skeptical.
My cynicism alert went off.
George
|
155.1350 | 2002 Winter Games | KAOT01::M_MORIN | A dead mean with the most toys is still a dead man. | Fri Jun 16 1995 16:06 | 5 |
| Anyone have any idea who won the right to host the 2002 Winter Games?
The two main contenders were supposed to be Quebec City and Salt Lake City.
/Mario
|
155.1351 | Utah | ODIXIE::ZOGRAN | Reasonable summer rates | Fri Jun 16 1995 16:29 | 4 |
| Salt Lake City won, after trying for 29 years to land them.
UMDan
|
155.1352 | | PEAKS::WOESTEHOFF | | Fri Jun 16 1995 16:29 | 3 |
| Salt Lake City was just awarded the winter Olympics.
Keith
|
155.1353 | | HELIX::MAIEWSKI | | Mon Jun 19 1995 15:01 | 10 |
| Salt Lake City got 54 out of 89 votes to win the 2002 Olympics on the 1st
ballot. Normally it takes 3 or 4 ballots for someone to get the 45 needed so
they won by a comfortable margin.
Most likely they would have won the '98 Olympics but a number of the people
voting didn't like the idea of giving the U.S. another Olympics just 2 years
after Atlanta. Nagomo Japan beat out Salt Lake City for 1998 by just a few
votes.
George
|